blob_id stringlengths 40 40 | directory_id stringlengths 40 40 | path stringlengths 7 139 | content_id stringlengths 40 40 | detected_licenses listlengths 0 16 | license_type stringclasses 2
values | repo_name stringlengths 7 55 | snapshot_id stringlengths 40 40 | revision_id stringlengths 40 40 | branch_name stringclasses 6
values | visit_date int64 1,471B 1,694B | revision_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | committer_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | github_id float64 1.33M 604M ⌀ | star_events_count int64 0 43.5k | fork_events_count int64 0 1.5k | gha_license_id stringclasses 6
values | gha_event_created_at int64 1,402B 1,695B ⌀ | gha_created_at int64 1,359B 1,637B ⌀ | gha_language stringclasses 19
values | src_encoding stringclasses 2
values | language stringclasses 1
value | is_vendor bool 1
class | is_generated bool 1
class | length_bytes int64 3 6.4M | extension stringclasses 4
values | content stringlengths 3 6.12M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
eea99c450a2e1ea2aec2d3ef37c2d29bfbc09553 | 432d948a4d3d242fdfb44b81c9e1b1baacd58617 | /src/topology/uniform_space/basic.lean | ded0478c3148b4e5365d385ffebba473071be28b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | JLimperg/aesop3 | 306cc6570c556568897ed2e508c8869667252e8a | a4a116f650cc7403428e72bd2e2c4cda300fe03f | refs/heads/master | 1,682,884,916,368 | 1,620,320,033,000 | 1,620,320,033,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 67,485 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import order.filter.lift
import topology.separation
/-!
# Uniform spaces
Uniform spaces are a generalization of metric spaces and topological groups. Many concepts directly
generalize to uniform spaces, e.g.
* uniform continuity (in this file)
* completeness (in `cauchy.lean`)
* extension of uniform continuous functions to complete spaces (in `uniform_embedding.lean`)
* totally bounded sets (in `cauchy.lean`)
* totally bounded complete sets are compact (in `cauchy.lean`)
A uniform structure on a type `X` is a filter `𝓤 X` on `X × X` satisfying some conditions
which makes it reasonable to say that `∀ᶠ (p : X × X) in 𝓤 X, ...` means
"for all p.1 and p.2 in X close enough, ...". Elements of this filter are called entourages
of `X`. The two main examples are:
* If `X` is a metric space, `V ∈ 𝓤 X ↔ ∃ ε > 0, { p | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } ⊆ V`
* If `G` is an additive topological group, `V ∈ 𝓤 G ↔ ∃ U ∈ 𝓝 (0 : G), {p | p.2 - p.1 ∈ U} ⊆ V`
Those examples are generalizations in two different directions of the elementary example where
`X = ℝ` and `V ∈ 𝓤 ℝ ↔ ∃ ε > 0, { p | |p.2 - p.1| < ε } ⊆ V` which features both the topological
group structure on `ℝ` and its metric space structure.
Each uniform structure on `X` induces a topology on `X` characterized by
> `nhds_eq_comap_uniformity : ∀ {x : X}, 𝓝 x = comap (prod.mk x) (𝓤 X)`
where `prod.mk x : X → X × X := (λ y, (x, y))` is the partial evaluation of the product
constructor.
The dictionary with metric spaces includes:
* an upper bound for `dist x y` translates into `(x, y) ∈ V` for some `V ∈ 𝓤 X`
* a ball `ball x r` roughly corresponds to `uniform_space.ball x V := {y | (x, y) ∈ V}`
for some `V ∈ 𝓤 X`, but the later is more general (it includes in
particular both open and closed balls for suitable `V`).
In particular we have:
`is_open_iff_ball_subset {s : set X} : is_open s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ V ∈ 𝓤 X, ball x V ⊆ s`
The triangle inequality is abstracted to a statement involving the composition of relations in `X`.
First note that the triangle inequality in a metric space is equivalent to
`∀ (x y z : X) (r r' : ℝ), dist x y ≤ r → dist y z ≤ r' → dist x z ≤ r + r'`.
Then, for any `V` and `W` with type `set (X × X)`, the composition `V ○ W : set (X × X)` is
defined as `{ p : X × X | ∃ z, (p.1, z) ∈ V ∧ (z, p.2) ∈ W }`.
In the metric space case, if `V = { p | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ r }` and `W = { p | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ r' }`
then the triangle inequality, as reformulated above, says `V ○ W` is contained in
`{p | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ r + r'}` which is the entourage associated to the radius `r + r'`.
In general we have `mem_ball_comp (h : y ∈ ball x V) (h' : z ∈ ball y W) : z ∈ ball x (V ○ W)`.
Note that this discussion does not depend on any axiom imposed on the uniformity filter,
it is simply captured by the definition of composition.
The uniform space axioms ask the filter `𝓤 X` to satisfy the following:
* every `V ∈ 𝓤 X` contains the diagonal `id_rel = { p | p.1 = p.2 }`. This abstracts the fact
that `dist x x ≤ r` for every non-negative radius `r` in the metric space case and also that
`x - x` belongs to every neighborhood of zero in the topological group case.
* `V ∈ 𝓤 X → prod.swap '' V ∈ 𝓤 X`. This is tightly related the fact that `dist x y = dist y x`
in a metric space, and to continuity of negation in the topological group case.
* `∀ V ∈ 𝓤 X, ∃ W ∈ 𝓤 X, W ○ W ⊆ V`. In the metric space case, it corresponds
to cutting the radius of a ball in half and applying the triangle inequality.
In the topological group case, it comes from continuity of addition at `(0, 0)`.
These three axioms are stated more abstractly in the definition below, in terms of
operations on filters, without directly manipulating entourages.
## Main definitions
* `uniform_space X` is a uniform space structure on a type `X`
* `uniform_continuous f` is a predicate saying a function `f : α → β` between uniform spaces
is uniformly continuous : `∀ r ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ (x : α × α) in 𝓤 α, (f x.1, f x.2) ∈ r`
In this file we also define a complete lattice structure on the type `uniform_space X`
of uniform structures on `X`, as well as the pullback (`uniform_space.comap`) of uniform structures
coming from the pullback of filters.
Like distance functions, uniform structures cannot be pushed forward in general.
## Notations
Localized in `uniformity`, we have the notation `𝓤 X` for the uniformity on a uniform space `X`,
and `○` for composition of relations, seen as terms with type `set (X × X)`.
## Implementation notes
There is already a theory of relations in `data/rel.lean` where the main definition is
`def rel (α β : Type*) := α → β → Prop`.
The relations used in the current file involve only one type, but this is not the reason why
we don't reuse `data/rel.lean`. We use `set (α × α)`
instead of `rel α α` because we really need sets to use the filter library, and elements
of filters on `α × α` have type `set (α × α)`.
The structure `uniform_space X` bundles a uniform structure on `X`, a topology on `X` and
an assumption saying those are compatible. This may not seem mathematically reasonable at first,
but is in fact an instance of the forgetful inheritance pattern. See Note [forgetful inheritance]
below.
## References
The formalization uses the books:
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
* [I. M. James, *Topologies and Uniformities*][james1999]
But it makes a more systematic use of the filter library.
-/
open set filter classical
open_locale classical topological_space filter
set_option eqn_compiler.zeta true
universes u
/-!
### Relations, seen as `set (α × α)`
-/
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
/-- The identity relation, or the graph of the identity function -/
def id_rel {α : Type*} := {p : α × α | p.1 = p.2}
@[simp] theorem mem_id_rel {a b : α} : (a, b) ∈ @id_rel α ↔ a = b := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem id_rel_subset {s : set (α × α)} : id_rel ⊆ s ↔ ∀ a, (a, a) ∈ s :=
by simp [subset_def]; exact forall_congr (λ a, by simp)
/-- The composition of relations -/
def comp_rel {α : Type u} (r₁ r₂ : set (α×α)) := {p : α × α | ∃z:α, (p.1, z) ∈ r₁ ∧ (z, p.2) ∈ r₂}
localized "infix ` ○ `:55 := comp_rel" in uniformity
@[simp] theorem mem_comp_rel {r₁ r₂ : set (α×α)}
{x y : α} : (x, y) ∈ r₁ ○ r₂ ↔ ∃ z, (x, z) ∈ r₁ ∧ (z, y) ∈ r₂ := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem swap_id_rel : prod.swap '' id_rel = @id_rel α :=
set.ext $ assume ⟨a, b⟩, by simp [image_swap_eq_preimage_swap]; exact eq_comm
theorem monotone_comp_rel [preorder β] {f g : β → set (α×α)}
(hf : monotone f) (hg : monotone g) : monotone (λx, (f x) ○ (g x)) :=
assume a b h p ⟨z, h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨z, hf h h₁, hg h h₂⟩
@[mono]
lemma comp_rel_mono {f g h k: set (α×α)} (h₁ : f ⊆ h) (h₂ : g ⊆ k) : f ○ g ⊆ h ○ k :=
λ ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨z, h, h'⟩, ⟨z, h₁ h, h₂ h'⟩
lemma prod_mk_mem_comp_rel {a b c : α} {s t : set (α×α)} (h₁ : (a, c) ∈ s) (h₂ : (c, b) ∈ t) :
(a, b) ∈ s ○ t :=
⟨c, h₁, h₂⟩
@[simp] lemma id_comp_rel {r : set (α×α)} : id_rel ○ r = r :=
set.ext $ assume ⟨a, b⟩, by simp
lemma comp_rel_assoc {r s t : set (α×α)} :
(r ○ s) ○ t = r ○ (s ○ t) :=
by ext p; cases p; simp only [mem_comp_rel]; tauto
lemma subset_comp_self {α : Type*} {s : set (α × α)} (h : id_rel ⊆ s) : s ⊆ s ○ s :=
λ ⟨x, y⟩ xy_in, ⟨x, h (by rw mem_id_rel), xy_in⟩
/-- The relation is invariant under swapping factors. -/
def symmetric_rel (V : set (α × α)) : Prop := prod.swap ⁻¹' V = V
/-- The maximal symmetric relation contained in a given relation. -/
def symmetrize_rel (V : set (α × α)) : set (α × α) := V ∩ prod.swap ⁻¹' V
lemma symmetric_symmetrize_rel (V : set (α × α)) : symmetric_rel (symmetrize_rel V) :=
by simp [symmetric_rel, symmetrize_rel, preimage_inter, inter_comm, ← preimage_comp]
lemma symmetrize_rel_subset_self (V : set (α × α)) : symmetrize_rel V ⊆ V :=
sep_subset _ _
@[mono]
lemma symmetrize_mono {V W: set (α × α)} (h : V ⊆ W) : symmetrize_rel V ⊆ symmetrize_rel W :=
inter_subset_inter h $ preimage_mono h
lemma symmetric_rel_inter {U V : set (α × α)} (hU : symmetric_rel U) (hV : symmetric_rel V) :
symmetric_rel (U ∩ V) :=
begin
unfold symmetric_rel at *,
rw [preimage_inter, hU, hV],
end
/-- This core description of a uniform space is outside of the type class hierarchy. It is useful
for constructions of uniform spaces, when the topology is derived from the uniform space. -/
structure uniform_space.core (α : Type u) :=
(uniformity : filter (α × α))
(refl : 𝓟 id_rel ≤ uniformity)
(symm : tendsto prod.swap uniformity uniformity)
(comp : uniformity.lift' (λs, s ○ s) ≤ uniformity)
/-- An alternative constructor for `uniform_space.core`. This version unfolds various
`filter`-related definitions. -/
def uniform_space.core.mk' {α : Type u} (U : filter (α × α))
(refl : ∀ (r ∈ U) x, (x, x) ∈ r)
(symm : ∀ r ∈ U, prod.swap ⁻¹' r ∈ U)
(comp : ∀ r ∈ U, ∃ t ∈ U, t ○ t ⊆ r) : uniform_space.core α :=
⟨U, λ r ru, id_rel_subset.2 (refl _ ru), symm,
begin
intros r ru,
rw [mem_lift'_sets],
exact comp _ ru,
apply monotone_comp_rel; exact monotone_id,
end⟩
/-- A uniform space generates a topological space -/
def uniform_space.core.to_topological_space {α : Type u} (u : uniform_space.core α) :
topological_space α :=
{ is_open := λs, ∀x∈s, { p : α × α | p.1 = x → p.2 ∈ s } ∈ u.uniformity,
is_open_univ := by simp; intro; exact univ_mem_sets,
is_open_inter :=
assume s t hs ht x ⟨xs, xt⟩, by filter_upwards [hs x xs, ht x xt]; simp {contextual := tt},
is_open_sUnion :=
assume s hs x ⟨t, ts, xt⟩, by filter_upwards [hs t ts x xt] assume p ph h, ⟨t, ts, ph h⟩ }
lemma uniform_space.core_eq :
∀{u₁ u₂ : uniform_space.core α}, u₁.uniformity = u₂.uniformity → u₁ = u₂
| ⟨u₁, _, _, _⟩ ⟨u₂, _, _, _⟩ h := by { congr, exact h }
-- the topological structure is embedded in the uniform structure
-- to avoid instance diamond issues. See Note [forgetful inheritance].
/-- A uniform space is a generalization of the "uniform" topological aspects of a
metric space. It consists of a filter on `α × α` called the "uniformity", which
satisfies properties analogous to the reflexivity, symmetry, and triangle properties
of a metric.
A metric space has a natural uniformity, and a uniform space has a natural topology.
A topological group also has a natural uniformity, even when it is not metrizable. -/
class uniform_space (α : Type u) extends topological_space α, uniform_space.core α :=
(is_open_uniformity : ∀s, is_open s ↔ (∀x∈s, { p : α × α | p.1 = x → p.2 ∈ s } ∈ uniformity))
/-- Alternative constructor for `uniform_space α` when a topology is already given. -/
@[pattern] def uniform_space.mk' {α} (t : topological_space α)
(c : uniform_space.core α)
(is_open_uniformity : ∀s:set α, t.is_open s ↔
(∀x∈s, { p : α × α | p.1 = x → p.2 ∈ s } ∈ c.uniformity)) :
uniform_space α := ⟨c, is_open_uniformity⟩
/-- Construct a `uniform_space` from a `uniform_space.core`. -/
def uniform_space.of_core {α : Type u} (u : uniform_space.core α) : uniform_space α :=
{ to_core := u,
to_topological_space := u.to_topological_space,
is_open_uniformity := assume a, iff.rfl }
/-- Construct a `uniform_space` from a `u : uniform_space.core` and a `topological_space` structure
that is equal to `u.to_topological_space`. -/
def uniform_space.of_core_eq {α : Type u} (u : uniform_space.core α) (t : topological_space α)
(h : t = u.to_topological_space) : uniform_space α :=
{ to_core := u,
to_topological_space := t,
is_open_uniformity := assume a, h.symm ▸ iff.rfl }
lemma uniform_space.to_core_to_topological_space (u : uniform_space α) :
u.to_core.to_topological_space = u.to_topological_space :=
topological_space_eq $ funext $ assume s,
by rw [uniform_space.core.to_topological_space, uniform_space.is_open_uniformity]
@[ext]
lemma uniform_space_eq : ∀{u₁ u₂ : uniform_space α}, u₁.uniformity = u₂.uniformity → u₁ = u₂
| (uniform_space.mk' t₁ u₁ o₁) (uniform_space.mk' t₂ u₂ o₂) h :=
have u₁ = u₂, from uniform_space.core_eq h,
have t₁ = t₂, from topological_space_eq $ funext $ assume s, by rw [o₁, o₂]; simp [this],
by simp [*]
lemma uniform_space.of_core_eq_to_core
(u : uniform_space α) (t : topological_space α) (h : t = u.to_core.to_topological_space) :
uniform_space.of_core_eq u.to_core t h = u :=
uniform_space_eq rfl
section uniform_space
variables [uniform_space α]
/-- The uniformity is a filter on α × α (inferred from an ambient uniform space
structure on α). -/
def uniformity (α : Type u) [uniform_space α] : filter (α × α) :=
(@uniform_space.to_core α _).uniformity
localized "notation `𝓤` := uniformity" in uniformity
lemma is_open_uniformity {s : set α} :
is_open s ↔ (∀x∈s, { p : α × α | p.1 = x → p.2 ∈ s } ∈ 𝓤 α) :=
uniform_space.is_open_uniformity s
lemma refl_le_uniformity : 𝓟 id_rel ≤ 𝓤 α :=
(@uniform_space.to_core α _).refl
lemma refl_mem_uniformity {x : α} {s : set (α × α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
(x, x) ∈ s :=
refl_le_uniformity h rfl
lemma symm_le_uniformity : map (@prod.swap α α) (𝓤 _) ≤ (𝓤 _) :=
(@uniform_space.to_core α _).symm
lemma comp_le_uniformity : (𝓤 α).lift' (λs:set (α×α), s ○ s) ≤ 𝓤 α :=
(@uniform_space.to_core α _).comp
lemma tendsto_swap_uniformity : tendsto (@prod.swap α α) (𝓤 α) (𝓤 α) :=
symm_le_uniformity
lemma comp_mem_uniformity_sets {s : set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, t ○ t ⊆ s :=
have s ∈ (𝓤 α).lift' (λt:set (α×α), t ○ t),
from comp_le_uniformity hs,
(mem_lift'_sets $ monotone_comp_rel monotone_id monotone_id).mp this
/-- Relation `λ f g, tendsto (λ x, (f x, g x)) l (𝓤 α)` is transitive. -/
lemma filter.tendsto.uniformity_trans {l : filter β} {f₁ f₂ f₃ : β → α}
(h₁₂ : tendsto (λ x, (f₁ x, f₂ x)) l (𝓤 α)) (h₂₃ : tendsto (λ x, (f₂ x, f₃ x)) l (𝓤 α)) :
tendsto (λ x, (f₁ x, f₃ x)) l (𝓤 α) :=
begin
refine le_trans (le_lift' $ λ s hs, mem_map.2 _) comp_le_uniformity,
filter_upwards [h₁₂ hs, h₂₃ hs],
exact λ x hx₁₂ hx₂₃, ⟨_, hx₁₂, hx₂₃⟩
end
/-- Relation `λ f g, tendsto (λ x, (f x, g x)) l (𝓤 α)` is symmetric -/
lemma filter.tendsto.uniformity_symm {l : filter β} {f : β → α × α}
(h : tendsto f l (𝓤 α)) :
tendsto (λ x, ((f x).2, (f x).1)) l (𝓤 α) :=
tendsto_swap_uniformity.comp h
/-- Relation `λ f g, tendsto (λ x, (f x, g x)) l (𝓤 α)` is reflexive. -/
lemma tendsto_diag_uniformity (f : β → α) (l : filter β) :
tendsto (λ x, (f x, f x)) l (𝓤 α) :=
assume s hs, mem_map.2 $ univ_mem_sets' $ λ x, refl_mem_uniformity hs
lemma tendsto_const_uniformity {a : α} {f : filter β} : tendsto (λ _, (a, a)) f (𝓤 α) :=
tendsto_diag_uniformity (λ _, a) f
lemma symm_of_uniformity {s : set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, (∀a b, (a, b) ∈ t → (b, a) ∈ t) ∧ t ⊆ s :=
have preimage prod.swap s ∈ 𝓤 α, from symm_le_uniformity hs,
⟨s ∩ preimage prod.swap s, inter_mem_sets hs this, λ a b ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨h₂, h₁⟩, inter_subset_left _ _⟩
lemma comp_symm_of_uniformity {s : set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, (∀{a b}, (a, b) ∈ t → (b, a) ∈ t) ∧ t ○ t ⊆ s :=
let ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs in
let ⟨t', ht', ht'₁, ht'₂⟩ := symm_of_uniformity ht₁ in
⟨t', ht', ht'₁, subset.trans (monotone_comp_rel monotone_id monotone_id ht'₂) ht₂⟩
lemma uniformity_le_symm : 𝓤 α ≤ (@prod.swap α α) <$> 𝓤 α :=
by rw [map_swap_eq_comap_swap];
from map_le_iff_le_comap.1 tendsto_swap_uniformity
lemma uniformity_eq_symm : 𝓤 α = (@prod.swap α α) <$> 𝓤 α :=
le_antisymm uniformity_le_symm symm_le_uniformity
lemma symmetrize_mem_uniformity {V : set (α × α)} (h : V ∈ 𝓤 α) : symmetrize_rel V ∈ 𝓤 α :=
begin
apply (𝓤 α).inter_sets h,
rw [← image_swap_eq_preimage_swap, uniformity_eq_symm],
exact image_mem_map h,
end
theorem uniformity_lift_le_swap {g : set (α×α) → filter β} {f : filter β} (hg : monotone g)
(h : (𝓤 α).lift (λs, g (preimage prod.swap s)) ≤ f) : (𝓤 α).lift g ≤ f :=
calc (𝓤 α).lift g ≤ (filter.map (@prod.swap α α) $ 𝓤 α).lift g :
lift_mono uniformity_le_symm (le_refl _)
... ≤ _ :
by rw [map_lift_eq2 hg, image_swap_eq_preimage_swap]; exact h
lemma uniformity_lift_le_comp {f : set (α×α) → filter β} (h : monotone f) :
(𝓤 α).lift (λs, f (s ○ s)) ≤ (𝓤 α).lift f :=
calc (𝓤 α).lift (λs, f (s ○ s)) =
((𝓤 α).lift' (λs:set (α×α), s ○ s)).lift f :
begin
rw [lift_lift'_assoc],
exact monotone_comp_rel monotone_id monotone_id,
exact h
end
... ≤ (𝓤 α).lift f : lift_mono comp_le_uniformity (le_refl _)
lemma comp_le_uniformity3 :
(𝓤 α).lift' (λs:set (α×α), s ○ (s ○ s)) ≤ (𝓤 α) :=
calc (𝓤 α).lift' (λd, d ○ (d ○ d)) =
(𝓤 α).lift (λs, (𝓤 α).lift' (λt:set(α×α), s ○ (t ○ t))) :
begin
rw [lift_lift'_same_eq_lift'],
exact (assume x, monotone_comp_rel monotone_const $ monotone_comp_rel monotone_id monotone_id),
exact (assume x, monotone_comp_rel monotone_id monotone_const),
end
... ≤ (𝓤 α).lift (λs, (𝓤 α).lift' (λt:set(α×α), s ○ t)) :
lift_mono' $ assume s hs, @uniformity_lift_le_comp α _ _ (𝓟 ∘ (○) s) $
monotone_principal.comp (monotone_comp_rel monotone_const monotone_id)
... = (𝓤 α).lift' (λs:set(α×α), s ○ s) :
lift_lift'_same_eq_lift'
(assume s, monotone_comp_rel monotone_const monotone_id)
(assume s, monotone_comp_rel monotone_id monotone_const)
... ≤ (𝓤 α) : comp_le_uniformity
lemma comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets {s : set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, symmetric_rel t ∧ t ○ t ⊆ s :=
begin
obtain ⟨w, w_in, w_sub⟩ : ∃ w ∈ 𝓤 α, w ○ w ⊆ s := comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs,
use [symmetrize_rel w, symmetrize_mem_uniformity w_in, symmetric_symmetrize_rel w],
have : symmetrize_rel w ⊆ w := symmetrize_rel_subset_self w,
calc symmetrize_rel w ○ symmetrize_rel w ⊆ w ○ w : by mono
... ⊆ s : w_sub,
end
lemma subset_comp_self_of_mem_uniformity {s : set (α × α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : s ⊆ s ○ s :=
subset_comp_self (refl_le_uniformity h)
lemma comp_comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets {s : set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, symmetric_rel t ∧ t ○ t ○ t ⊆ s :=
begin
rcases comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets hs with ⟨w, w_in, w_symm, w_sub⟩,
rcases comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets w_in with ⟨t, t_in, t_symm, t_sub⟩,
use [t, t_in, t_symm],
have : t ⊆ t ○ t := subset_comp_self_of_mem_uniformity t_in,
calc
t ○ t ○ t ⊆ w ○ t : by mono
... ⊆ w ○ (t ○ t) : by mono
... ⊆ w ○ w : by mono
... ⊆ s : w_sub,
end
/-!
### Balls in uniform spaces
-/
/-- The ball around `(x : β)` with respect to `(V : set (β × β))`. Intended to be
used for `V ∈ 𝓤 β`, but this is not needed for the definition. Recovers the
notions of metric space ball when `V = {p | dist p.1 p.2 < r }`. -/
def uniform_space.ball (x : β) (V : set (β × β)) : set β := (prod.mk x) ⁻¹' V
open uniform_space (ball)
lemma uniform_space.mem_ball_self (x : α) {V : set (α × α)} (hV : V ∈ 𝓤 α) :
x ∈ ball x V :=
refl_mem_uniformity hV
/-- The triangle inequality for `uniform_space.ball` -/
lemma mem_ball_comp {V W : set (β × β)} {x y z} (h : y ∈ ball x V) (h' : z ∈ ball y W) :
z ∈ ball x (V ○ W) :=
prod_mk_mem_comp_rel h h'
lemma ball_subset_of_comp_subset {V W : set (β × β)} {x y} (h : x ∈ ball y W) (h' : W ○ W ⊆ V) :
ball x W ⊆ ball y V :=
λ z z_in, h' (mem_ball_comp h z_in)
lemma ball_mono {V W : set (β × β)} (h : V ⊆ W) (x : β) : ball x V ⊆ ball x W :=
by tauto
lemma mem_ball_symmetry {V : set (β × β)} (hV : symmetric_rel V) {x y} :
x ∈ ball y V ↔ y ∈ ball x V :=
show (x, y) ∈ prod.swap ⁻¹' V ↔ (x, y) ∈ V, by { unfold symmetric_rel at hV, rw hV }
lemma ball_eq_of_symmetry {V : set (β × β)} (hV : symmetric_rel V) {x} :
ball x V = {y | (y, x) ∈ V} :=
by { ext y, rw mem_ball_symmetry hV, exact iff.rfl }
lemma mem_comp_of_mem_ball {V W : set (β × β)} {x y z : β} (hV : symmetric_rel V)
(hx : x ∈ ball z V) (hy : y ∈ ball z W) : (x, y) ∈ V ○ W :=
begin
rw mem_ball_symmetry hV at hx,
exact ⟨z, hx, hy⟩
end
lemma uniform_space.is_open_ball (x : α) {V : set (α × α)} (hV : is_open V) :
is_open (ball x V) :=
hV.preimage $ continuous_const.prod_mk continuous_id
lemma mem_comp_comp {V W M : set (β × β)} (hW' : symmetric_rel W) {p : β × β} :
p ∈ V ○ M ○ W ↔ ((ball p.1 V).prod (ball p.2 W) ∩ M).nonempty :=
begin
cases p with x y,
split,
{ rintros ⟨z, ⟨w, hpw, hwz⟩, hzy⟩,
exact ⟨(w, z), ⟨hpw, by rwa mem_ball_symmetry hW'⟩, hwz⟩, },
{ rintro ⟨⟨w, z⟩, ⟨w_in, z_in⟩, hwz⟩,
rwa mem_ball_symmetry hW' at z_in,
use [z, w] ; tauto },
end
/-!
### Neighborhoods in uniform spaces
-/
lemma mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_right {x : α} {s : set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ {p : α × α | p.1 = x → p.2 ∈ s} ∈ 𝓤 α :=
⟨ begin
simp only [mem_nhds_sets_iff, is_open_uniformity, and_imp, exists_imp_distrib],
exact assume t ts ht xt, by filter_upwards [ht x xt] assume ⟨x', y⟩ h eq, ts $ h eq
end,
assume hs,
mem_nhds_sets_iff.mpr ⟨{x | {p : α × α | p.1 = x → p.2 ∈ s} ∈ 𝓤 α},
assume x' hx', refl_mem_uniformity hx' rfl,
is_open_uniformity.mpr $ assume x' hx',
let ⟨t, ht, tr⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets hx' in
by filter_upwards [ht] assume ⟨a, b⟩ hp' (hax' : a = x'),
by filter_upwards [ht] assume ⟨a, b'⟩ hp'' (hab : a = b),
have hp : (x', b) ∈ t, from hax' ▸ hp',
have (b, b') ∈ t, from hab ▸ hp'',
have (x', b') ∈ t ○ t, from ⟨b, hp, this⟩,
show b' ∈ s,
from tr this rfl,
hs⟩⟩
lemma mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_left {x : α} {s : set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ {p : α × α | p.2 = x → p.1 ∈ s} ∈ 𝓤 α :=
by { rw [uniformity_eq_symm, mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_right], refl }
lemma nhds_eq_comap_uniformity_aux {α : Type u} {x : α} {s : set α} {F : filter (α × α)} :
{p : α × α | p.fst = x → p.snd ∈ s} ∈ F ↔ s ∈ comap (prod.mk x) F :=
by rw mem_comap_sets ; from iff.intro
(assume hs, ⟨_, hs, assume x hx, hx rfl⟩)
(assume ⟨t, h, ht⟩, F.sets_of_superset h $
assume ⟨p₁, p₂⟩ hp (h : p₁ = x), ht $ by simp [h.symm, hp])
lemma nhds_eq_comap_uniformity {x : α} : 𝓝 x = (𝓤 α).comap (prod.mk x) :=
by { ext s, rw [mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_right], exact nhds_eq_comap_uniformity_aux }
lemma is_open_iff_ball_subset {s : set α} : is_open s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ V ∈ 𝓤 α, ball x V ⊆ s :=
begin
simp_rw [is_open_iff_mem_nhds, nhds_eq_comap_uniformity],
exact iff.rfl,
end
lemma nhds_basis_uniformity' {p : β → Prop} {s : β → set (α × α)} (h : (𝓤 α).has_basis p s)
{x : α} :
(𝓝 x).has_basis p (λ i, ball x (s i)) :=
by { rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity], exact h.comap (prod.mk x) }
lemma nhds_basis_uniformity {p : β → Prop} {s : β → set (α × α)} (h : (𝓤 α).has_basis p s) {x : α} :
(𝓝 x).has_basis p (λ i, {y | (y, x) ∈ s i}) :=
begin
replace h := h.comap prod.swap,
rw [← map_swap_eq_comap_swap, ← uniformity_eq_symm] at h,
exact nhds_basis_uniformity' h
end
lemma uniform_space.mem_nhds_iff {x : α} {s : set α} : s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ V ∈ 𝓤 α, ball x V ⊆ s :=
begin
rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, mem_comap_sets],
exact iff.rfl,
end
lemma uniform_space.ball_mem_nhds (x : α) ⦃V : set (α × α)⦄ (V_in : V ∈ 𝓤 α) : ball x V ∈ 𝓝 x :=
begin
rw uniform_space.mem_nhds_iff,
exact ⟨V, V_in, subset.refl _⟩
end
lemma uniform_space.mem_nhds_iff_symm {x : α} {s : set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ V ∈ 𝓤 α, symmetric_rel V ∧ ball x V ⊆ s :=
begin
rw uniform_space.mem_nhds_iff,
split,
{ rintros ⟨V, V_in, V_sub⟩,
use [symmetrize_rel V, symmetrize_mem_uniformity V_in, symmetric_symmetrize_rel V],
exact subset.trans (ball_mono (symmetrize_rel_subset_self V) x) V_sub },
{ rintros ⟨V, V_in, V_symm, V_sub⟩,
exact ⟨V, V_in, V_sub⟩ }
end
lemma uniform_space.has_basis_nhds (x : α) :
has_basis (𝓝 x) (λ s : set (α × α), s ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ symmetric_rel s) (λ s, ball x s) :=
⟨λ t, by simp [uniform_space.mem_nhds_iff_symm, and_assoc]⟩
open uniform_space
lemma uniform_space.has_basis_nhds_prod (x y : α) :
has_basis (𝓝 (x, y)) (λ s, s ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ symmetric_rel s) $ λ s, (ball x s).prod (ball y s) :=
begin
rw nhds_prod_eq,
apply (has_basis_nhds x).prod' (has_basis_nhds y),
rintro U V ⟨U_in, U_symm⟩ ⟨V_in, V_symm⟩,
exact ⟨U ∩ V, ⟨(𝓤 α).inter_sets U_in V_in, symmetric_rel_inter U_symm V_symm⟩,
ball_mono (inter_subset_left U V) x, ball_mono (inter_subset_right U V) y⟩,
end
lemma nhds_eq_uniformity {x : α} : 𝓝 x = (𝓤 α).lift' (ball x) :=
(nhds_basis_uniformity' (𝓤 α).basis_sets).eq_binfi
lemma mem_nhds_left (x : α) {s : set (α×α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
{y : α | (x, y) ∈ s} ∈ 𝓝 x :=
ball_mem_nhds x h
lemma mem_nhds_right (y : α) {s : set (α×α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
{x : α | (x, y) ∈ s} ∈ 𝓝 y :=
mem_nhds_left _ (symm_le_uniformity h)
lemma tendsto_right_nhds_uniformity {a : α} : tendsto (λa', (a', a)) (𝓝 a) (𝓤 α) :=
assume s, mem_nhds_right a
lemma tendsto_left_nhds_uniformity {a : α} : tendsto (λa', (a, a')) (𝓝 a) (𝓤 α) :=
assume s, mem_nhds_left a
lemma lift_nhds_left {x : α} {g : set α → filter β} (hg : monotone g) :
(𝓝 x).lift g = (𝓤 α).lift (λs:set (α×α), g {y | (x, y) ∈ s}) :=
eq.trans
begin
rw [nhds_eq_uniformity],
exact (filter.lift_assoc $ monotone_principal.comp $ monotone_preimage.comp monotone_preimage )
end
(congr_arg _ $ funext $ assume s, filter.lift_principal hg)
lemma lift_nhds_right {x : α} {g : set α → filter β} (hg : monotone g) :
(𝓝 x).lift g = (𝓤 α).lift (λs:set (α×α), g {y | (y, x) ∈ s}) :=
calc (𝓝 x).lift g = (𝓤 α).lift (λs:set (α×α), g {y | (x, y) ∈ s}) : lift_nhds_left hg
... = ((@prod.swap α α) <$> (𝓤 α)).lift (λs:set (α×α), g {y | (x, y) ∈ s}) :
by rw [←uniformity_eq_symm]
... = (𝓤 α).lift (λs:set (α×α), g {y | (x, y) ∈ image prod.swap s}) :
map_lift_eq2 $ hg.comp monotone_preimage
... = _ : by simp [image_swap_eq_preimage_swap]
lemma nhds_nhds_eq_uniformity_uniformity_prod {a b : α} :
𝓝 a ×ᶠ 𝓝 b =
(𝓤 α).lift (λs:set (α×α), (𝓤 α).lift' (λt:set (α×α),
set.prod {y : α | (y, a) ∈ s} {y : α | (b, y) ∈ t})) :=
begin
rw [prod_def],
show (𝓝 a).lift (λs:set α, (𝓝 b).lift (λt:set α, 𝓟 (set.prod s t))) = _,
rw [lift_nhds_right],
apply congr_arg, funext s,
rw [lift_nhds_left],
refl,
exact monotone_principal.comp (monotone_prod monotone_const monotone_id),
exact (monotone_lift' monotone_const $ monotone_lam $
assume x, monotone_prod monotone_id monotone_const)
end
lemma nhds_eq_uniformity_prod {a b : α} :
𝓝 (a, b) =
(𝓤 α).lift' (λs:set (α×α), set.prod {y : α | (y, a) ∈ s} {y : α | (b, y) ∈ s}) :=
begin
rw [nhds_prod_eq, nhds_nhds_eq_uniformity_uniformity_prod, lift_lift'_same_eq_lift'],
{ intro s, exact monotone_prod monotone_const monotone_preimage },
{ intro t, exact monotone_prod monotone_preimage monotone_const }
end
lemma nhdset_of_mem_uniformity {d : set (α×α)} (s : set (α×α)) (hd : d ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃(t : set (α×α)), is_open t ∧ s ⊆ t ∧ t ⊆ {p | ∃x y, (p.1, x) ∈ d ∧ (x, y) ∈ s ∧ (y, p.2) ∈ d} :=
let cl_d := {p:α×α | ∃x y, (p.1, x) ∈ d ∧ (x, y) ∈ s ∧ (y, p.2) ∈ d} in
have ∀p ∈ s, ∃t ⊆ cl_d, is_open t ∧ p ∈ t, from
assume ⟨x, y⟩ hp, mem_nhds_sets_iff.mp $
show cl_d ∈ 𝓝 (x, y),
begin
rw [nhds_eq_uniformity_prod, mem_lift'_sets],
exact ⟨d, hd, assume ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨ha, hb⟩, ⟨x, y, ha, hp, hb⟩⟩,
exact monotone_prod monotone_preimage monotone_preimage
end,
have ∃t:(Π(p:α×α) (h:p ∈ s), set (α×α)),
∀p, ∀h:p ∈ s, t p h ⊆ cl_d ∧ is_open (t p h) ∧ p ∈ t p h,
by simp [classical.skolem] at this; simp; assumption,
match this with
| ⟨t, ht⟩ :=
⟨(⋃ p:α×α, ⋃ h : p ∈ s, t p h : set (α×α)),
is_open_Union $ assume (p:α×α), is_open_Union $ assume hp, (ht p hp).right.left,
assume ⟨a, b⟩ hp, begin simp; exact ⟨a, b, hp, (ht (a,b) hp).right.right⟩ end,
Union_subset $ assume p, Union_subset $ assume hp, (ht p hp).left⟩
end
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
lemma nhds_le_uniformity (x : α) : 𝓝 (x, x) ≤ 𝓤 α :=
begin
intros V V_in,
rcases comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets V_in with ⟨w, w_in, w_symm, w_sub⟩,
have : (ball x w).prod (ball x w) ∈ 𝓝 (x, x),
{ rw nhds_prod_eq,
exact prod_mem_prod (ball_mem_nhds x w_in) (ball_mem_nhds x w_in) },
apply mem_sets_of_superset this,
rintros ⟨u, v⟩ ⟨u_in, v_in⟩,
exact w_sub (mem_comp_of_mem_ball w_symm u_in v_in)
end
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
lemma supr_nhds_le_uniformity : (⨆ x : α, 𝓝 (x, x)) ≤ 𝓤 α :=
supr_le nhds_le_uniformity
/-!
### Closure and interior in uniform spaces
-/
lemma closure_eq_uniformity (s : set $ α × α) :
closure s = ⋂ V ∈ {V | V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ symmetric_rel V}, V ○ s ○ V :=
begin
ext ⟨x, y⟩,
simp_rw [mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis (uniform_space.has_basis_nhds_prod x y),
mem_Inter, mem_set_of_eq],
apply forall_congr,
intro V,
apply forall_congr,
rintros ⟨V_in, V_symm⟩,
simp_rw [mem_comp_comp V_symm, inter_comm, exists_prop],
exact iff.rfl,
end
lemma uniformity_has_basis_closed : has_basis (𝓤 α) (λ V : set (α × α), V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ is_closed V) id :=
begin
refine filter.has_basis_self.2 (λ t h, _),
rcases comp_comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets h with ⟨w, w_in, w_symm, r⟩,
refine ⟨closure w, mem_sets_of_superset w_in subset_closure, is_closed_closure, _⟩,
refine subset.trans _ r,
rw closure_eq_uniformity,
apply Inter_subset_of_subset,
apply Inter_subset,
exact ⟨w_in, w_symm⟩
end
/-- Closed entourages form a basis of the uniformity filter. -/
lemma uniformity_has_basis_closure : has_basis (𝓤 α) (λ V : set (α × α), V ∈ 𝓤 α) closure :=
⟨begin
intro t,
rw uniformity_has_basis_closed.mem_iff,
split,
{ rintros ⟨r, ⟨r_in, r_closed⟩, r_sub⟩,
use [r, r_in],
convert r_sub,
rw r_closed.closure_eq,
refl },
{ rintros ⟨r, r_in, r_sub⟩,
exact ⟨closure r, ⟨mem_sets_of_superset r_in subset_closure, is_closed_closure⟩, r_sub⟩ }
end⟩
lemma closure_eq_inter_uniformity {t : set (α×α)} :
closure t = (⋂ d ∈ 𝓤 α, d ○ (t ○ d)) :=
set.ext $ assume ⟨a, b⟩,
calc (a, b) ∈ closure t ↔ (𝓝 (a, b) ⊓ 𝓟 t ≠ ⊥) : mem_closure_iff_nhds_ne_bot
... ↔ (((@prod.swap α α) <$> 𝓤 α).lift'
(λ (s : set (α × α)), set.prod {x : α | (x, a) ∈ s} {y : α | (b, y) ∈ s}) ⊓ 𝓟 t ≠ ⊥) :
by rw [←uniformity_eq_symm, nhds_eq_uniformity_prod]
... ↔ ((map (@prod.swap α α) (𝓤 α)).lift'
(λ (s : set (α × α)), set.prod {x : α | (x, a) ∈ s} {y : α | (b, y) ∈ s}) ⊓ 𝓟 t ≠ ⊥) :
by refl
... ↔ ((𝓤 α).lift'
(λ (s : set (α × α)), set.prod {y : α | (a, y) ∈ s} {x : α | (x, b) ∈ s}) ⊓ 𝓟 t ≠ ⊥) :
begin
rw [map_lift'_eq2],
simp [image_swap_eq_preimage_swap, function.comp],
exact monotone_prod monotone_preimage monotone_preimage
end
... ↔ (∀s ∈ 𝓤 α, (set.prod {y : α | (a, y) ∈ s} {x : α | (x, b) ∈ s} ∩ t).nonempty) :
begin
rw [lift'_inf_principal_eq, ← ne_bot_iff, lift'_ne_bot_iff],
exact monotone_inter (monotone_prod monotone_preimage monotone_preimage) monotone_const
end
... ↔ (∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, (a, b) ∈ s ○ (t ○ s)) :
forall_congr $ assume s, forall_congr $ assume hs,
⟨assume ⟨⟨x, y⟩, ⟨⟨hx, hy⟩, hxyt⟩⟩, ⟨x, hx, y, hxyt, hy⟩,
assume ⟨x, hx, y, hxyt, hy⟩, ⟨⟨x, y⟩, ⟨⟨hx, hy⟩, hxyt⟩⟩⟩
... ↔ _ : by simp
lemma uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure : 𝓤 α = (𝓤 α).lift' closure :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume s, le_infi $ assume hs, by simp; filter_upwards [hs] subset_closure)
(calc (𝓤 α).lift' closure ≤ (𝓤 α).lift' (λd, d ○ (d ○ d)) :
lift'_mono' (by intros s hs; rw [closure_eq_inter_uniformity]; exact bInter_subset_of_mem hs)
... ≤ (𝓤 α) : comp_le_uniformity3)
lemma uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior : 𝓤 α = (𝓤 α).lift' interior :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume d, le_infi $ assume hd,
let ⟨s, hs, hs_comp⟩ := (mem_lift'_sets $
monotone_comp_rel monotone_id $ monotone_comp_rel monotone_id monotone_id).mp
(comp_le_uniformity3 hd) in
let ⟨t, ht, hst, ht_comp⟩ := nhdset_of_mem_uniformity s hs in
have s ⊆ interior d, from
calc s ⊆ t : hst
... ⊆ interior d : (subset_interior_iff_subset_of_open ht).mpr $
λ x (hx : x ∈ t), let ⟨x, y, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := ht_comp hx in hs_comp ⟨x, h₁, y, h₂, h₃⟩,
have interior d ∈ 𝓤 α, by filter_upwards [hs] this,
by simp [this])
(assume s hs, ((𝓤 α).lift' interior).sets_of_superset (mem_lift' hs) interior_subset)
lemma interior_mem_uniformity {s : set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
interior s ∈ 𝓤 α :=
by rw [uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior]; exact mem_lift' hs
lemma mem_uniformity_is_closed {s : set (α×α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃t ∈ 𝓤 α, is_closed t ∧ t ⊆ s :=
let ⟨t, ⟨ht_mem, htc⟩, hts⟩ := uniformity_has_basis_closed.mem_iff.1 h in
⟨t, ht_mem, htc, hts⟩
/-- The uniform neighborhoods of all points of a dense set cover the whole space. -/
lemma dense.bUnion_uniformity_ball {s : set α} {U : set (α × α)} (hs : dense s) (hU : U ∈ 𝓤 α) :
(⋃ x ∈ s, ball x U) = univ :=
begin
refine bUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 (λ y, _),
rcases hs.inter_nhds_nonempty (mem_nhds_right y hU) with ⟨x, hxs, hxy : (x, y) ∈ U⟩,
exact ⟨x, hxs, hxy⟩
end
/-!
### Uniformity bases
-/
/-- Open elements of `𝓤 α` form a basis of `𝓤 α`. -/
lemma uniformity_has_basis_open : has_basis (𝓤 α) (λ V : set (α × α), V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ is_open V) id :=
has_basis_self.2 $ λ s hs,
⟨interior s, interior_mem_uniformity hs, is_open_interior, interior_subset⟩
lemma filter.has_basis.mem_uniformity_iff {p : β → Prop} {s : β → set (α×α)}
(h : (𝓤 α).has_basis p s) {t : set (α × α)} :
t ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ ∃ i (hi : p i), ∀ a b, (a, b) ∈ s i → (a, b) ∈ t :=
h.mem_iff.trans $ by simp only [prod.forall, subset_def]
/-- Symmetric entourages form a basis of `𝓤 α` -/
lemma uniform_space.has_basis_symmetric :
(𝓤 α).has_basis (λ s : set (α × α), s ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ symmetric_rel s) id :=
has_basis_self.2 $ λ t t_in, ⟨symmetrize_rel t, symmetrize_mem_uniformity t_in,
symmetric_symmetrize_rel t, symmetrize_rel_subset_self t⟩
/-- Open elements `s : set (α × α)` of `𝓤 α` such that `(x, y) ∈ s ↔ (y, x) ∈ s` form a basis
of `𝓤 α`. -/
lemma uniformity_has_basis_open_symmetric :
has_basis (𝓤 α) (λ V : set (α × α), V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ is_open V ∧ symmetric_rel V) id :=
begin
simp only [← and_assoc],
refine uniformity_has_basis_open.restrict (λ s hs, ⟨symmetrize_rel s, _⟩),
exact ⟨⟨symmetrize_mem_uniformity hs.1, is_open_inter hs.2 (hs.2.preimage continuous_swap)⟩,
symmetric_symmetrize_rel s, symmetrize_rel_subset_self s⟩
end
lemma uniform_space.has_seq_basis (h : is_countably_generated $ 𝓤 α) :
∃ V : ℕ → set (α × α), has_antimono_basis (𝓤 α) (λ _, true) V ∧ ∀ n, symmetric_rel (V n) :=
let ⟨U, hsym, hbasis⟩ := h.exists_antimono_subbasis uniform_space.has_basis_symmetric
in ⟨U, hbasis, λ n, (hsym n).2⟩
/-! ### Uniform continuity -/
/-- A function `f : α → β` is *uniformly continuous* if `(f x, f y)` tends to the diagonal
as `(x, y)` tends to the diagonal. In other words, if `x` is sufficiently close to `y`, then
`f x` is close to `f y` no matter where `x` and `y` are located in `α`. -/
def uniform_continuous [uniform_space β] (f : α → β) :=
tendsto (λx:α×α, (f x.1, f x.2)) (𝓤 α) (𝓤 β)
/-- A function `f : α → β` is *uniformly continuous* on `s : set α` if `(f x, f y)` tends to
the diagonal as `(x, y)` tends to the diagonal while remaining in `s.prod s`.
In other words, if `x` is sufficiently close to `y`, then `f x` is close to
`f y` no matter where `x` and `y` are located in `s`.-/
def uniform_continuous_on [uniform_space β] (f : α → β) (s : set α) : Prop :=
tendsto (λ x : α × α, (f x.1, f x.2)) (𝓤 α ⊓ principal (s.prod s)) (𝓤 β)
theorem uniform_continuous_def [uniform_space β] {f : α → β} :
uniform_continuous f ↔ ∀ r ∈ 𝓤 β, { x : α × α | (f x.1, f x.2) ∈ r} ∈ 𝓤 α :=
iff.rfl
theorem uniform_continuous_iff_eventually [uniform_space β] {f : α → β} :
uniform_continuous f ↔ ∀ r ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ (x : α × α) in 𝓤 α, (f x.1, f x.2) ∈ r :=
iff.rfl
lemma uniform_continuous_of_const [uniform_space β] {c : α → β} (h : ∀a b, c a = c b) :
uniform_continuous c :=
have (λ (x : α × α), (c (x.fst), c (x.snd))) ⁻¹' id_rel = univ, from
eq_univ_iff_forall.2 $ assume ⟨a, b⟩, h a b,
le_trans (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ by simp [comap_principal, this, univ_mem_sets]) refl_le_uniformity
lemma uniform_continuous_id : uniform_continuous (@id α) :=
by simp [uniform_continuous]; exact tendsto_id
lemma uniform_continuous_const [uniform_space β] {b : β} : uniform_continuous (λa:α, b) :=
uniform_continuous_of_const $ λ _ _, rfl
lemma uniform_continuous.comp [uniform_space β] [uniform_space γ] {g : β → γ} {f : α → β}
(hg : uniform_continuous g) (hf : uniform_continuous f) : uniform_continuous (g ∘ f) :=
hg.comp hf
lemma filter.has_basis.uniform_continuous_iff [uniform_space β] {p : γ → Prop} {s : γ → set (α×α)}
(ha : (𝓤 α).has_basis p s) {q : δ → Prop} {t : δ → set (β×β)} (hb : (𝓤 β).has_basis q t)
{f : α → β} :
uniform_continuous f ↔ ∀ i (hi : q i), ∃ j (hj : p j), ∀ x y, (x, y) ∈ s j → (f x, f y) ∈ t i :=
(ha.tendsto_iff hb).trans $ by simp only [prod.forall]
lemma filter.has_basis.uniform_continuous_on_iff [uniform_space β] {p : γ → Prop}
{s : γ → set (α×α)} (ha : (𝓤 α).has_basis p s) {q : δ → Prop} {t : δ → set (β×β)}
(hb : (𝓤 β).has_basis q t) {f : α → β} {S : set α} :
uniform_continuous_on f S ↔
∀ i (hi : q i), ∃ j (hj : p j), ∀ x y ∈ S, (x, y) ∈ s j → (f x, f y) ∈ t i :=
((ha.inf_principal (S.prod S)).tendsto_iff hb).trans $ by finish [prod.forall]
end uniform_space
open_locale uniformity
section constructions
instance : partial_order (uniform_space α) :=
{ le := λt s, t.uniformity ≤ s.uniformity,
le_antisymm := assume t s h₁ h₂, uniform_space_eq $ le_antisymm h₁ h₂,
le_refl := assume t, le_refl _,
le_trans := assume a b c h₁ h₂, le_trans h₁ h₂ }
instance : has_Inf (uniform_space α) :=
⟨assume s, uniform_space.of_core {
uniformity := (⨅u∈s, @uniformity α u),
refl := le_infi $ assume u, le_infi $ assume hu, u.refl,
symm := le_infi $ assume u, le_infi $ assume hu,
le_trans (map_mono $ infi_le_of_le _ $ infi_le _ hu) u.symm,
comp := le_infi $ assume u, le_infi $ assume hu,
le_trans (lift'_mono (infi_le_of_le _ $ infi_le _ hu) $ le_refl _) u.comp }⟩
private lemma Inf_le {tt : set (uniform_space α)} {t : uniform_space α} (h : t ∈ tt) :
Inf tt ≤ t :=
show (⨅u∈tt, @uniformity α u) ≤ t.uniformity,
from infi_le_of_le t $ infi_le _ h
private lemma le_Inf {tt : set (uniform_space α)} {t : uniform_space α} (h : ∀t'∈tt, t ≤ t') :
t ≤ Inf tt :=
show t.uniformity ≤ (⨅u∈tt, @uniformity α u),
from le_infi $ assume t', le_infi $ assume ht', h t' ht'
instance : has_top (uniform_space α) :=
⟨uniform_space.of_core { uniformity := ⊤, refl := le_top, symm := le_top, comp := le_top }⟩
instance : has_bot (uniform_space α) :=
⟨{ to_topological_space := ⊥,
uniformity := 𝓟 id_rel,
refl := le_refl _,
symm := by simp [tendsto]; apply subset.refl,
comp :=
begin
rw [lift'_principal], {simp},
exact monotone_comp_rel monotone_id monotone_id
end,
is_open_uniformity :=
assume s, by simp [is_open_fold, subset_def, id_rel] {contextual := tt } } ⟩
instance : complete_lattice (uniform_space α) :=
{ sup := λa b, Inf {x | a ≤ x ∧ b ≤ x},
le_sup_left := λ a b, le_Inf (λ _ ⟨h, _⟩, h),
le_sup_right := λ a b, le_Inf (λ _ ⟨_, h⟩, h),
sup_le := λ a b c h₁ h₂, Inf_le ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
inf := λ a b, Inf {a, b},
le_inf := λ a b c h₁ h₂, le_Inf (λ u h,
by { cases h, exact h.symm ▸ h₁, exact (mem_singleton_iff.1 h).symm ▸ h₂ }),
inf_le_left := λ a b, Inf_le (by simp),
inf_le_right := λ a b, Inf_le (by simp),
top := ⊤,
le_top := λ a, show a.uniformity ≤ ⊤, from le_top,
bot := ⊥,
bot_le := λ u, u.refl,
Sup := λ tt, Inf {t | ∀ t' ∈ tt, t' ≤ t},
le_Sup := λ s u h, le_Inf (λ u' h', h' u h),
Sup_le := λ s u h, Inf_le h,
Inf := Inf,
le_Inf := λ s a hs, le_Inf hs,
Inf_le := λ s a ha, Inf_le ha,
..uniform_space.partial_order }
lemma infi_uniformity {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → uniform_space α} :
(infi u).uniformity = (⨅i, (u i).uniformity) :=
show (⨅a (h : ∃i:ι, u i = a), a.uniformity) = _, from
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume i, infi_le_of_le (u i) $ infi_le _ ⟨i, rfl⟩)
(le_infi $ assume a, le_infi $ assume ⟨i, (ha : u i = a)⟩, ha ▸ infi_le _ _)
lemma inf_uniformity {u v : uniform_space α} :
(u ⊓ v).uniformity = u.uniformity ⊓ v.uniformity :=
have (u ⊓ v) = (⨅i (h : i = u ∨ i = v), i), by simp [infi_or, infi_inf_eq],
calc (u ⊓ v).uniformity = ((⨅i (h : i = u ∨ i = v), i) : uniform_space α).uniformity : by rw [this]
... = _ : by simp [infi_uniformity, infi_or, infi_inf_eq]
instance inhabited_uniform_space : inhabited (uniform_space α) := ⟨⊥⟩
instance inhabited_uniform_space_core : inhabited (uniform_space.core α) :=
⟨@uniform_space.to_core _ (default _)⟩
/-- Given `f : α → β` and a uniformity `u` on `β`, the inverse image of `u` under `f`
is the inverse image in the filter sense of the induced function `α × α → β × β`. -/
def uniform_space.comap (f : α → β) (u : uniform_space β) : uniform_space α :=
{ uniformity := u.uniformity.comap (λp:α×α, (f p.1, f p.2)),
to_topological_space := u.to_topological_space.induced f,
refl := le_trans (by simp; exact assume ⟨a, b⟩ (h : a = b), h ▸ rfl) (comap_mono u.refl),
symm := by simp [tendsto_comap_iff, prod.swap, (∘)];
exact tendsto_swap_uniformity.comp tendsto_comap,
comp := le_trans
begin
rw [comap_lift'_eq, comap_lift'_eq2],
exact (lift'_mono' $ assume s hs ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨x, h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨f x, h₁, h₂⟩),
repeat { exact monotone_comp_rel monotone_id monotone_id }
end
(comap_mono u.comp),
is_open_uniformity := λ s, begin
change (@is_open α (u.to_topological_space.induced f) s ↔ _),
simp [is_open_iff_nhds, nhds_induced, mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_right, filter.comap, and_comm],
refine ball_congr (λ x hx, ⟨_, _⟩),
{ rintro ⟨t, hts, ht⟩, refine ⟨_, ht, _⟩,
rintro ⟨x₁, x₂⟩ h rfl, exact hts (h rfl) },
{ rintro ⟨t, ht, hts⟩,
exact ⟨{y | (f x, y) ∈ t}, λ y hy, @hts (x, y) hy rfl,
mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_right.1 $ mem_nhds_left _ ht⟩ }
end }
lemma uniformity_comap [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β] {f : α → β}
(h : ‹uniform_space α› = uniform_space.comap f ‹uniform_space β›) :
𝓤 α = comap (prod.map f f) (𝓤 β) :=
by { rw h, refl }
lemma uniform_space_comap_id {α : Type*} : uniform_space.comap (id : α → α) = id :=
by ext u ; dsimp [uniform_space.comap] ; rw [prod.id_prod, filter.comap_id]
lemma uniform_space.comap_comap {α β γ} [uγ : uniform_space γ] {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} :
uniform_space.comap (g ∘ f) uγ = uniform_space.comap f (uniform_space.comap g uγ) :=
by ext ; dsimp [uniform_space.comap] ; rw filter.comap_comap
lemma uniform_continuous_iff {α β} [uα : uniform_space α] [uβ : uniform_space β] {f : α → β} :
uniform_continuous f ↔ uα ≤ uβ.comap f :=
filter.map_le_iff_le_comap
lemma uniform_continuous_comap {f : α → β} [u : uniform_space β] :
@uniform_continuous α β (uniform_space.comap f u) u f :=
tendsto_comap
theorem to_topological_space_comap {f : α → β} {u : uniform_space β} :
@uniform_space.to_topological_space _ (uniform_space.comap f u) =
topological_space.induced f (@uniform_space.to_topological_space β u) := rfl
lemma uniform_continuous_comap' {f : γ → β} {g : α → γ} [v : uniform_space β] [u : uniform_space α]
(h : uniform_continuous (f ∘ g)) : @uniform_continuous α γ u (uniform_space.comap f v) g :=
tendsto_comap_iff.2 h
lemma to_nhds_mono {u₁ u₂ : uniform_space α} (h : u₁ ≤ u₂) (a : α) :
@nhds _ (@uniform_space.to_topological_space _ u₁) a ≤
@nhds _ (@uniform_space.to_topological_space _ u₂) a :=
by rw [@nhds_eq_uniformity α u₁ a, @nhds_eq_uniformity α u₂ a]; exact (lift'_mono h le_rfl)
lemma to_topological_space_mono {u₁ u₂ : uniform_space α} (h : u₁ ≤ u₂) :
@uniform_space.to_topological_space _ u₁ ≤ @uniform_space.to_topological_space _ u₂ :=
le_of_nhds_le_nhds $ to_nhds_mono h
lemma uniform_continuous.continuous [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β] {f : α → β}
(hf : uniform_continuous f) : continuous f :=
continuous_iff_le_induced.mpr $ to_topological_space_mono $ uniform_continuous_iff.1 hf
lemma to_topological_space_bot : @uniform_space.to_topological_space α ⊥ = ⊥ := rfl
lemma to_topological_space_top : @uniform_space.to_topological_space α ⊤ = ⊤ :=
top_unique $ assume s hs, s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim
(assume : s = ∅, this.symm ▸ @is_open_empty _ ⊤)
(assume ⟨x, hx⟩,
have s = univ, from top_unique $ assume y hy, hs x hx (x, y) rfl,
this.symm ▸ @is_open_univ _ ⊤)
lemma to_topological_space_infi {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → uniform_space α} :
(infi u).to_topological_space = ⨅i, (u i).to_topological_space :=
begin
by_cases h : nonempty ι,
{ resetI,
refine (eq_of_nhds_eq_nhds $ assume a, _),
rw [nhds_infi, nhds_eq_uniformity],
change (infi u).uniformity.lift' (preimage $ prod.mk a) = _,
rw [infi_uniformity, lift'_infi],
{ simp only [nhds_eq_uniformity], refl },
{ exact assume a b, rfl } },
{ rw [infi_of_empty h, infi_of_empty h, to_topological_space_top] }
end
lemma to_topological_space_Inf {s : set (uniform_space α)} :
(Inf s).to_topological_space = (⨅i∈s, @uniform_space.to_topological_space α i) :=
begin
rw [Inf_eq_infi],
simp only [← to_topological_space_infi],
end
lemma to_topological_space_inf {u v : uniform_space α} :
(u ⊓ v).to_topological_space = u.to_topological_space ⊓ v.to_topological_space :=
by rw [to_topological_space_Inf, infi_pair]
instance : uniform_space empty := ⊥
instance : uniform_space unit := ⊥
instance : uniform_space bool := ⊥
instance : uniform_space ℕ := ⊥
instance : uniform_space ℤ := ⊥
instance {p : α → Prop} [t : uniform_space α] : uniform_space (subtype p) :=
uniform_space.comap subtype.val t
lemma uniformity_subtype {p : α → Prop} [t : uniform_space α] :
𝓤 (subtype p) = comap (λq:subtype p × subtype p, (q.1.1, q.2.1)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
lemma uniform_continuous_subtype_val {p : α → Prop} [uniform_space α] :
uniform_continuous (subtype.val : {a : α // p a} → α) :=
uniform_continuous_comap
lemma uniform_continuous_subtype_mk {p : α → Prop} [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β]
{f : β → α} (hf : uniform_continuous f) (h : ∀x, p (f x)) :
uniform_continuous (λx, ⟨f x, h x⟩ : β → subtype p) :=
uniform_continuous_comap' hf
lemma uniform_continuous_on_iff_restrict [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β] {f : α → β}
{s : set α} :
uniform_continuous_on f s ↔ uniform_continuous (s.restrict f) :=
begin
unfold uniform_continuous_on set.restrict uniform_continuous tendsto,
rw [show (λ x : s × s, (f x.1, f x.2)) = prod.map f f ∘ coe, by ext x; cases x; refl,
uniformity_comap rfl,
show prod.map subtype.val subtype.val = (coe : s × s → α × α), by ext x; cases x; refl],
conv in (map _ (comap _ _)) { rw ← filter.map_map },
rw subtype_coe_map_comap_prod, refl,
end
lemma tendsto_of_uniform_continuous_subtype
[uniform_space α] [uniform_space β] {f : α → β} {s : set α} {a : α}
(hf : uniform_continuous (λx:s, f x.val)) (ha : s ∈ 𝓝 a) :
tendsto f (𝓝 a) (𝓝 (f a)) :=
by rw [(@map_nhds_subtype_coe_eq α _ s a (mem_of_nhds ha) ha).symm]; exact
tendsto_map' (continuous_iff_continuous_at.mp hf.continuous _)
lemma uniform_continuous_on.continuous_on [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β] {f : α → β}
{s : set α} (h : uniform_continuous_on f s) : continuous_on f s :=
begin
rw uniform_continuous_on_iff_restrict at h,
rw continuous_on_iff_continuous_restrict,
exact h.continuous
end
section prod
/- a similar product space is possible on the function space (uniformity of pointwise convergence),
but we want to have the uniformity of uniform convergence on function spaces -/
instance [u₁ : uniform_space α] [u₂ : uniform_space β] : uniform_space (α × β) :=
uniform_space.of_core_eq
(u₁.comap prod.fst ⊓ u₂.comap prod.snd).to_core
prod.topological_space
(calc prod.topological_space = (u₁.comap prod.fst ⊓ u₂.comap prod.snd).to_topological_space :
by rw [to_topological_space_inf, to_topological_space_comap, to_topological_space_comap]; refl
... = _ : by rw [uniform_space.to_core_to_topological_space])
theorem uniformity_prod [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β] : 𝓤 (α × β) =
(𝓤 α).comap (λp:(α × β) × α × β, (p.1.1, p.2.1)) ⊓
(𝓤 β).comap (λp:(α × β) × α × β, (p.1.2, p.2.2)) :=
inf_uniformity
lemma uniformity_prod_eq_prod [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β] :
𝓤 (α×β) =
map (λp:(α×α)×(β×β), ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) (𝓤 α ×ᶠ 𝓤 β) :=
have map (λp:(α×α)×(β×β), ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) =
comap (λp:(α×β)×(α×β), ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))),
from funext $ assume f, map_eq_comap_of_inverse
(funext $ assume ⟨⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩⟩, rfl) (funext $ assume ⟨⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩⟩, rfl),
by rw [this, uniformity_prod, filter.prod, comap_inf, comap_comap, comap_comap]
lemma mem_map_sets_iff' {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {f : filter α} {m : α → β} {t : set β} :
t ∈ (map m f).sets ↔ (∃s∈f, m '' s ⊆ t) :=
mem_map_sets_iff
lemma mem_uniformity_of_uniform_continuous_invariant [uniform_space α] {s:set (α×α)} {f : α → α → α}
(hf : uniform_continuous (λp:α×α, f p.1 p.2)) (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃u∈𝓤 α, ∀a b c, (a, b) ∈ u → (f a c, f b c) ∈ s :=
begin
rw [uniform_continuous, uniformity_prod_eq_prod, tendsto_map'_iff, (∘)] at hf,
rcases mem_map_sets_iff'.1 (hf hs) with ⟨t, ht, hts⟩, clear hf,
rcases mem_prod_iff.1 ht with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, huvt⟩, clear ht,
refine ⟨u, hu, assume a b c hab, hts $ (mem_image _ _ _).2 ⟨⟨⟨a, b⟩, ⟨c, c⟩⟩, huvt ⟨_, _⟩, _⟩⟩,
exact hab,
exact refl_mem_uniformity hv,
refl
end
lemma mem_uniform_prod [t₁ : uniform_space α] [t₂ : uniform_space β] {a : set (α × α)}
{b : set (β × β)} (ha : a ∈ 𝓤 α) (hb : b ∈ 𝓤 β) :
{p:(α×β)×(α×β) | (p.1.1, p.2.1) ∈ a ∧ (p.1.2, p.2.2) ∈ b } ∈ (@uniformity (α × β) _) :=
by rw [uniformity_prod]; exact inter_mem_inf_sets (preimage_mem_comap ha) (preimage_mem_comap hb)
lemma tendsto_prod_uniformity_fst [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β] :
tendsto (λp:(α×β)×(α×β), (p.1.1, p.2.1)) (𝓤 (α × β)) (𝓤 α) :=
le_trans (map_mono (@inf_le_left (uniform_space (α×β)) _ _ _)) map_comap_le
lemma tendsto_prod_uniformity_snd [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β] :
tendsto (λp:(α×β)×(α×β), (p.1.2, p.2.2)) (𝓤 (α × β)) (𝓤 β) :=
le_trans (map_mono (@inf_le_right (uniform_space (α×β)) _ _ _)) map_comap_le
lemma uniform_continuous_fst [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β] :
uniform_continuous (λp:α×β, p.1) :=
tendsto_prod_uniformity_fst
lemma uniform_continuous_snd [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β] :
uniform_continuous (λp:α×β, p.2) :=
tendsto_prod_uniformity_snd
variables [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β] [uniform_space γ]
lemma uniform_continuous.prod_mk
{f₁ : α → β} {f₂ : α → γ} (h₁ : uniform_continuous f₁) (h₂ : uniform_continuous f₂) :
uniform_continuous (λa, (f₁ a, f₂ a)) :=
by rw [uniform_continuous, uniformity_prod]; exact
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₁, tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₂⟩
lemma uniform_continuous.prod_mk_left {f : α × β → γ} (h : uniform_continuous f) (b) :
uniform_continuous (λ a, f (a,b)) :=
h.comp (uniform_continuous_id.prod_mk uniform_continuous_const)
lemma uniform_continuous.prod_mk_right {f : α × β → γ} (h : uniform_continuous f) (a) :
uniform_continuous (λ b, f (a,b)) :=
h.comp (uniform_continuous_const.prod_mk uniform_continuous_id)
lemma uniform_continuous.prod_map [uniform_space δ] {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ}
(hf : uniform_continuous f) (hg : uniform_continuous g) :
uniform_continuous (prod.map f g) :=
(hf.comp uniform_continuous_fst).prod_mk (hg.comp uniform_continuous_snd)
lemma to_topological_space_prod {α} {β} [u : uniform_space α] [v : uniform_space β] :
@uniform_space.to_topological_space (α × β) prod.uniform_space =
@prod.topological_space α β u.to_topological_space v.to_topological_space := rfl
end prod
section
open uniform_space function
variables {δ' : Type*} [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β] [uniform_space γ] [uniform_space δ]
[uniform_space δ']
local notation f `∘₂` g := function.bicompr f g
/-- Uniform continuity for functions of two variables. -/
def uniform_continuous₂ (f : α → β → γ) := uniform_continuous (uncurry f)
lemma uniform_continuous₂_def (f : α → β → γ) :
uniform_continuous₂ f ↔ uniform_continuous (uncurry f) := iff.rfl
lemma uniform_continuous₂.uniform_continuous {f : α → β → γ} (h : uniform_continuous₂ f) :
uniform_continuous (uncurry f) := h
lemma uniform_continuous₂_curry (f : α × β → γ) :
uniform_continuous₂ (function.curry f) ↔ uniform_continuous f :=
by rw [uniform_continuous₂, uncurry_curry]
lemma uniform_continuous₂.comp {f : α → β → γ} {g : γ → δ}
(hg : uniform_continuous g) (hf : uniform_continuous₂ f) :
uniform_continuous₂ (g ∘₂ f) :=
hg.comp hf
lemma uniform_continuous₂.bicompl {f : α → β → γ} {ga : δ → α} {gb : δ' → β}
(hf : uniform_continuous₂ f) (hga : uniform_continuous ga) (hgb : uniform_continuous gb) :
uniform_continuous₂ (bicompl f ga gb) :=
hf.uniform_continuous.comp (hga.prod_map hgb)
end
lemma to_topological_space_subtype [u : uniform_space α] {p : α → Prop} :
@uniform_space.to_topological_space (subtype p) subtype.uniform_space =
@subtype.topological_space α p u.to_topological_space := rfl
section sum
variables [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β]
open sum
/-- Uniformity on a disjoint union. Entourages of the diagonal in the union are obtained
by taking independently an entourage of the diagonal in the first part, and an entourage of
the diagonal in the second part. -/
def uniform_space.core.sum : uniform_space.core (α ⊕ β) :=
uniform_space.core.mk'
(map (λ p : α × α, (inl p.1, inl p.2)) (𝓤 α) ⊔ map (λ p : β × β, (inr p.1, inr p.2)) (𝓤 β))
(λ r ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ x, by cases x; [apply refl_mem_uniformity H₁, apply refl_mem_uniformity H₂])
(λ r ⟨H₁, H₂⟩, ⟨symm_le_uniformity H₁, symm_le_uniformity H₂⟩)
(λ r ⟨Hrα, Hrβ⟩, begin
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets Hrα with ⟨tα, htα, Htα⟩,
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets Hrβ with ⟨tβ, htβ, Htβ⟩,
refine ⟨_,
⟨mem_map_sets_iff.2 ⟨tα, htα, subset_union_left _ _⟩,
mem_map_sets_iff.2 ⟨tβ, htβ, subset_union_right _ _⟩⟩, _⟩,
rintros ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨z, ⟨⟨a, b⟩, hab, ⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨a, b⟩, hab, ⟨⟩⟩,
⟨⟨_, c⟩, hbc, ⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨_, c⟩, hbc, ⟨⟩⟩⟩,
{ have A : (a, c) ∈ tα ○ tα := ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩,
exact Htα A },
{ have A : (a, c) ∈ tβ ○ tβ := ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩,
exact Htβ A }
end)
/-- The union of an entourage of the diagonal in each set of a disjoint union is again an entourage
of the diagonal. -/
lemma union_mem_uniformity_sum
{a : set (α × α)} (ha : a ∈ 𝓤 α) {b : set (β × β)} (hb : b ∈ 𝓤 β) :
((λ p : (α × α), (inl p.1, inl p.2)) '' a ∪ (λ p : (β × β), (inr p.1, inr p.2)) '' b) ∈
(@uniform_space.core.sum α β _ _).uniformity :=
⟨mem_map_sets_iff.2 ⟨_, ha, subset_union_left _ _⟩,
mem_map_sets_iff.2 ⟨_, hb, subset_union_right _ _⟩⟩
/- To prove that the topology defined by the uniform structure on the disjoint union coincides with
the disjoint union topology, we need two lemmas saying that open sets can be characterized by
the uniform structure -/
lemma uniformity_sum_of_open_aux {s : set (α ⊕ β)} (hs : is_open s) {x : α ⊕ β} (xs : x ∈ s) :
{ p : ((α ⊕ β) × (α ⊕ β)) | p.1 = x → p.2 ∈ s } ∈ (@uniform_space.core.sum α β _ _).uniformity :=
begin
cases x,
{ refine mem_sets_of_superset
(union_mem_uniformity_sum (mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_right.1 (mem_nhds_sets hs.1 xs))
univ_mem_sets)
(union_subset _ _);
rintro _ ⟨⟨_, b⟩, h, ⟨⟩⟩ ⟨⟩,
exact h rfl },
{ refine mem_sets_of_superset
(union_mem_uniformity_sum univ_mem_sets (mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_right.1
(mem_nhds_sets hs.2 xs)))
(union_subset _ _);
rintro _ ⟨⟨a, _⟩, h, ⟨⟩⟩ ⟨⟩,
exact h rfl },
end
lemma open_of_uniformity_sum_aux {s : set (α ⊕ β)}
(hs : ∀x ∈ s, { p : ((α ⊕ β) × (α ⊕ β)) | p.1 = x → p.2 ∈ s } ∈
(@uniform_space.core.sum α β _ _).uniformity) :
is_open s :=
begin
split,
{ refine (@is_open_iff_mem_nhds α _ _).2 (λ a ha, mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_right.2 _),
rcases mem_map_sets_iff.1 (hs _ ha).1 with ⟨t, ht, st⟩,
refine mem_sets_of_superset ht _,
rintro p pt rfl, exact st ⟨_, pt, rfl⟩ rfl },
{ refine (@is_open_iff_mem_nhds β _ _).2 (λ b hb, mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_right.2 _),
rcases mem_map_sets_iff.1 (hs _ hb).2 with ⟨t, ht, st⟩,
refine mem_sets_of_superset ht _,
rintro p pt rfl, exact st ⟨_, pt, rfl⟩ rfl }
end
/- We can now define the uniform structure on the disjoint union -/
instance sum.uniform_space : uniform_space (α ⊕ β) :=
{ to_core := uniform_space.core.sum,
is_open_uniformity := λ s, ⟨uniformity_sum_of_open_aux, open_of_uniformity_sum_aux⟩ }
lemma sum.uniformity : 𝓤 (α ⊕ β) =
map (λ p : α × α, (inl p.1, inl p.2)) (𝓤 α) ⊔
map (λ p : β × β, (inr p.1, inr p.2)) (𝓤 β) := rfl
end sum
end constructions
-- For a version of the Lebesgue number lemma assuming only a sequentially compact space,
-- see topology/sequences.lean
/-- Let `c : ι → set α` be an open cover of a compact set `s`. Then there exists an entourage
`n` such that for each `x ∈ s` its `n`-neighborhood is contained in some `c i`. -/
lemma lebesgue_number_lemma {α : Type u} [uniform_space α] {s : set α} {ι} {c : ι → set α}
(hs : is_compact s) (hc₁ : ∀ i, is_open (c i)) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃ i, c i) :
∃ n ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ i, {y | (x, y) ∈ n} ⊆ c i :=
begin
let u := λ n, {x | ∃ i (m ∈ 𝓤 α), {y | (x, y) ∈ m ○ n} ⊆ c i},
have hu₁ : ∀ n ∈ 𝓤 α, is_open (u n),
{ refine λ n hn, is_open_uniformity.2 _,
rintro x ⟨i, m, hm, h⟩,
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets hm with ⟨m', hm', mm'⟩,
apply (𝓤 α).sets_of_superset hm',
rintros ⟨x, y⟩ hp rfl,
refine ⟨i, m', hm', λ z hz, h (monotone_comp_rel monotone_id monotone_const mm' _)⟩,
dsimp at hz ⊢, rw comp_rel_assoc,
exact ⟨y, hp, hz⟩ },
have hu₂ : s ⊆ ⋃ n ∈ 𝓤 α, u n,
{ intros x hx,
rcases mem_Union.1 (hc₂ hx) with ⟨i, h⟩,
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets (is_open_uniformity.1 (hc₁ i) x h) with ⟨m', hm', mm'⟩,
exact mem_bUnion hm' ⟨i, _, hm', λ y hy, mm' hy rfl⟩ },
rcases hs.elim_finite_subcover_image hu₁ hu₂ with ⟨b, bu, b_fin, b_cover⟩,
refine ⟨_, (bInter_mem_sets b_fin).2 bu, λ x hx, _⟩,
rcases mem_bUnion_iff.1 (b_cover hx) with ⟨n, bn, i, m, hm, h⟩,
refine ⟨i, λ y hy, h _⟩,
exact prod_mk_mem_comp_rel (refl_mem_uniformity hm) (bInter_subset_of_mem bn hy)
end
/-- Let `c : set (set α)` be an open cover of a compact set `s`. Then there exists an entourage
`n` such that for each `x ∈ s` its `n`-neighborhood is contained in some `t ∈ c`. -/
lemma lebesgue_number_lemma_sUnion {α : Type u} [uniform_space α] {s : set α} {c : set (set α)}
(hs : is_compact s) (hc₁ : ∀ t ∈ c, is_open t) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃₀ c) :
∃ n ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ c, ∀ y, (x, y) ∈ n → y ∈ t :=
by rw sUnion_eq_Union at hc₂;
simpa using lebesgue_number_lemma hs (by simpa) hc₂
/-!
### Expressing continuity properties in uniform spaces
We reformulate the various continuity properties of functions taking values in a uniform space
in terms of the uniformity in the target. Since the same lemmas (essentially with the same names)
also exist for metric spaces and emetric spaces (reformulating things in terms of the distance or
the edistance in the target), we put them in a namespace `uniform` here.
In the metric and emetric space setting, there are also similar lemmas where one assumes that
both the source and the target are metric spaces, reformulating things in terms of the distance
on both sides. These lemmas are generally written without primes, and the versions where only
the target is a metric space is primed. We follow the same convention here, thus giving lemmas
with primes.
-/
namespace uniform
variables [uniform_space α]
theorem tendsto_nhds_right {f : filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} :
tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ tendsto (λ x, (a, u x)) f (𝓤 α) :=
⟨λ H, tendsto_left_nhds_uniformity.comp H,
λ H s hs, by simpa [mem_of_nhds hs] using H (mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_right.1 hs)⟩
theorem tendsto_nhds_left {f : filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} :
tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ tendsto (λ x, (u x, a)) f (𝓤 α) :=
⟨λ H, tendsto_right_nhds_uniformity.comp H,
λ H s hs, by simpa [mem_of_nhds hs] using H (mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_left.1 hs)⟩
theorem continuous_at_iff'_right [topological_space β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
continuous_at f b ↔ tendsto (λ x, (f b, f x)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) :=
by rw [continuous_at, tendsto_nhds_right]
theorem continuous_at_iff'_left [topological_space β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
continuous_at f b ↔ tendsto (λ x, (f x, f b)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) :=
by rw [continuous_at, tendsto_nhds_left]
theorem continuous_at_iff_prod [topological_space β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
continuous_at f b ↔ tendsto (λ x : β × β, (f x.1, f x.2)) (𝓝 (b, b)) (𝓤 α) :=
⟨λ H, le_trans (H.prod_map' H) (nhds_le_uniformity _),
λ H, continuous_at_iff'_left.2 $ H.comp $ tendsto_id.prod_mk_nhds tendsto_const_nhds⟩
theorem continuous_within_at_iff'_right [topological_space β] {f : β → α} {b : β} {s : set β} :
continuous_within_at f s b ↔ tendsto (λ x, (f b, f x)) (𝓝[s] b) (𝓤 α) :=
by rw [continuous_within_at, tendsto_nhds_right]
theorem continuous_within_at_iff'_left [topological_space β] {f : β → α} {b : β} {s : set β} :
continuous_within_at f s b ↔ tendsto (λ x, (f x, f b)) (𝓝[s] b) (𝓤 α) :=
by rw [continuous_within_at, tendsto_nhds_left]
theorem continuous_on_iff'_right [topological_space β] {f : β → α} {s : set β} :
continuous_on f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, tendsto (λ x, (f b, f x)) (𝓝[s] b) (𝓤 α) :=
by simp [continuous_on, continuous_within_at_iff'_right]
theorem continuous_on_iff'_left [topological_space β] {f : β → α} {s : set β} :
continuous_on f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, tendsto (λ x, (f x, f b)) (𝓝[s] b) (𝓤 α) :=
by simp [continuous_on, continuous_within_at_iff'_left]
theorem continuous_iff'_right [topological_space β] {f : β → α} :
continuous f ↔ ∀ b, tendsto (λ x, (f b, f x)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.trans $ forall_congr $ λ b, tendsto_nhds_right
theorem continuous_iff'_left [topological_space β] {f : β → α} :
continuous f ↔ ∀ b, tendsto (λ x, (f x, f b)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.trans $ forall_congr $ λ b, tendsto_nhds_left
end uniform
lemma filter.tendsto.congr_uniformity {α β} [uniform_space β] {f g : α → β} {l : filter α} {b : β}
(hf : tendsto f l (𝓝 b)) (hg : tendsto (λ x, (f x, g x)) l (𝓤 β)) :
tendsto g l (𝓝 b) :=
uniform.tendsto_nhds_right.2 $ (uniform.tendsto_nhds_right.1 hf).uniformity_trans hg
lemma uniform.tendsto_congr {α β} [uniform_space β] {f g : α → β} {l : filter α} {b : β}
(hfg : tendsto (λ x, (f x, g x)) l (𝓤 β)) :
tendsto f l (𝓝 b) ↔ tendsto g l (𝓝 b) :=
⟨λ h, h.congr_uniformity hfg, λ h, h.congr_uniformity hfg.uniformity_symm⟩
|
0121c41b80f230b2d6521159f3adf2e5b0465226 | 83c8119e3298c0bfc53fc195c41a6afb63d01513 | /library/init/meta/tactic.lean | 1d24029195c0774bc9942f4f98852331128c9ed3 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | anfelor/lean | 584b91c4e87a6d95f7630c2a93fb082a87319ed0 | 31cfc2b6bf7d674f3d0f73848b842c9c9869c9f1 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,067,141,310 | 1,585,992,232,000 | 1,585,992,232,000 | 251,683,543 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,585,676,570,000 | 1,585,676,569,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 62,657 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import init.function init.data.option.basic init.util
import init.category.combinators init.category.monad init.category.alternative init.category.monad_fail
import init.data.nat.div init.meta.exceptional init.meta.format init.meta.environment
import init.meta.pexpr init.data.repr init.data.string.basic init.meta.interaction_monad
meta constant tactic_state : Type
universes u v
namespace tactic_state
meta constant env : tactic_state → environment
/-- Format the given tactic state. If `target_lhs_only` is true and the target
is of the form `lhs ~ rhs`, where `~` is a simplification relation,
then only the `lhs` is displayed.
Remark: the parameter `target_lhs_only` is a temporary hack used to implement
the `conv` monad. It will be removed in the future. -/
meta constant to_format (s : tactic_state) (target_lhs_only : bool := ff) : format
/-- Format expression with respect to the main goal in the tactic state.
If the tactic state does not contain any goals, then format expression
using an empty local context. -/
meta constant format_expr : tactic_state → expr → format
meta constant get_options : tactic_state → options
meta constant set_options : tactic_state → options → tactic_state
end tactic_state
meta instance : has_to_format tactic_state :=
⟨tactic_state.to_format⟩
meta instance : has_to_string tactic_state :=
⟨λ s, (to_fmt s).to_string s.get_options⟩
/-- `tactic` is the monad for building tactics.
You use this to:
- View and modify the local goals and hypotheses in the prover's state.
- Invoke type checking and elaboration of terms.
- View and modify the environment.
- Build new tactics out of existing ones such as `simp` and `rewrite`.
-/
@[reducible] meta def tactic := interaction_monad tactic_state
@[reducible] meta def tactic_result := interaction_monad.result tactic_state
namespace tactic
export interaction_monad (hiding failed fail)
/-- Cause the tactic to fail with no error message. -/
meta def failed {α : Type} : tactic α := interaction_monad.failed
meta def fail {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [has_to_format β] (msg : β) : tactic α :=
interaction_monad.fail msg
end tactic
namespace tactic_result
export interaction_monad.result
end tactic_result
open tactic
open tactic_result
infixl ` >>=[tactic] `:2 := interaction_monad_bind
infixl ` >>[tactic] `:2 := interaction_monad_seq
meta instance : alternative tactic :=
{ failure := @interaction_monad.failed _,
orelse := @interaction_monad_orelse _,
..interaction_monad.monad }
meta def {u₁ u₂} tactic.up {α : Type u₂} (t : tactic α) : tactic (ulift.{u₁} α) :=
λ s, match t s with
| success a s' := success (ulift.up a) s'
| exception t ref s := exception t ref s
end
meta def {u₁ u₂} tactic.down {α : Type u₂} (t : tactic (ulift.{u₁} α)) : tactic α :=
λ s, match t s with
| success (ulift.up a) s' := success a s'
| exception t ref s := exception t ref s
end
namespace interactive
/-- Typeclass for custom interaction monads, which provides
the information required to convert an interactive-mode
construction to a `tactic` which can actually be executed.
Given a `[monad m]`, `execute_with` explains how to turn a `begin ... end`
block, or a `by ...` statement into a `tactic α` which can actually be
executed. The `inhabited` first argument facilitates the passing of an
optional configuration parameter `config`, using the syntax:
```
begin [custom_monad] with config,
...
end
```
-/
meta class executor (m : Type → Type u) [monad m] :=
(config_type : Type)
[inhabited : inhabited config_type]
(execute_with : config_type → m unit → tactic unit)
attribute [inline] executor.execute_with
@[inline]
meta def executor.execute_explicit (m : Type → Type u)
[monad m] [e : executor m] : m unit → tactic unit :=
executor.execute_with e.inhabited.default
@[inline]
meta def executor.execute_with_explicit (m : Type → Type u)
[monad m] [executor m] : executor.config_type m → m unit → tactic unit :=
executor.execute_with
/-- Default `executor` instance for `tactic`s themselves -/
meta instance : executor tactic :=
{ config_type := unit,
inhabited := ⟨()⟩,
execute_with := λ _, id }
end interactive
namespace tactic
variables {α : Type u}
meta def try_core (t : tactic α) : tactic (option α) :=
λ s, result.cases_on (t s)
(λ a, success (some a))
(λ e ref s', success none s)
/-- Does nothing. -/
meta def skip : tactic unit :=
success ()
meta def try (t : tactic α) : tactic unit :=
try_core t >>[tactic] skip
meta def try_lst : list (tactic unit) → tactic unit
| [] := failed
| (tac :: tacs) := λ s,
match tac s with
| result.success _ s' := try (try_lst tacs) s'
| result.exception e p s' :=
match try_lst tacs s' with
| result.exception _ _ _ := result.exception e p s'
| r := r
end
end
meta def fail_if_success {α : Type u} (t : tactic α) : tactic unit :=
λ s, result.cases_on (t s)
(λ a s, mk_exception "fail_if_success combinator failed, given tactic succeeded" none s)
(λ e ref s', success () s)
meta def success_if_fail {α : Type u} (t : tactic α) : tactic unit :=
λ s, match t s with
| (interaction_monad.result.exception _ _ s') := success () s
| (interaction_monad.result.success a s) :=
mk_exception "success_if_fail combinator failed, given tactic succeeded" none s
end
open nat
/-- (iterate_at_most n t): repeat the given tactic at most n times or until t fails -/
meta def iterate_at_most : nat → tactic unit → tactic unit
| 0 t := skip
| (succ n) t := (do t, iterate_at_most n t) <|> skip
/-- (iterate_exactly n t) : execute t n times -/
meta def iterate_exactly : nat → tactic unit → tactic unit
| 0 t := skip
| (succ n) t := do t, iterate_exactly n t
/-- Repeat the given tactic forever. -/
meta def iterate : tactic unit → tactic unit :=
iterate_at_most 100000
meta def returnopt (e : option α) : tactic α :=
λ s, match e with
| (some a) := success a s
| none := mk_exception "failed" none s
end
meta instance opt_to_tac : has_coe (option α) (tactic α) :=
⟨returnopt⟩
/-- Decorate t's exceptions with msg. -/
meta def decorate_ex (msg : format) (t : tactic α) : tactic α :=
λ s, result.cases_on (t s)
success
(λ opt_thunk,
match opt_thunk with
| some e := exception (some (λ u, msg ++ format.nest 2 (format.line ++ e u)))
| none := exception none
end)
/-- Set the tactic_state. -/
@[inline] meta def write (s' : tactic_state) : tactic unit :=
λ s, success () s'
/-- Get the tactic_state. -/
@[inline] meta def read : tactic tactic_state :=
λ s, success s s
meta def get_options : tactic options :=
do s ← read, return s.get_options
meta def set_options (o : options) : tactic unit :=
do s ← read, write (s.set_options o)
meta def save_options {α : Type} (t : tactic α) : tactic α :=
do o ← get_options,
a ← t,
set_options o,
return a
meta def returnex {α : Type} (e : exceptional α) : tactic α :=
λ s, match e with
| exceptional.success a := success a s
| exceptional.exception ._ f :=
match get_options s with
| success opt _ := exception (some (λ u, f opt)) none s
| exception _ _ _ := exception (some (λ u, f options.mk)) none s
end
end
meta instance ex_to_tac {α : Type} : has_coe (exceptional α) (tactic α) :=
⟨returnex⟩
end tactic
meta def tactic_format_expr (e : expr) : tactic format :=
do s ← tactic.read, return (tactic_state.format_expr s e)
meta class has_to_tactic_format (α : Type u) :=
(to_tactic_format : α → tactic format)
meta instance : has_to_tactic_format expr :=
⟨tactic_format_expr⟩
meta def tactic.pp {α : Type u} [has_to_tactic_format α] : α → tactic format :=
has_to_tactic_format.to_tactic_format
open tactic format
meta instance {α : Type u} [has_to_tactic_format α] : has_to_tactic_format (list α) :=
⟨λ l, to_fmt <$> l.mmap pp⟩
meta instance (α : Type u) (β : Type v) [has_to_tactic_format α] [has_to_tactic_format β] :
has_to_tactic_format (α × β) :=
⟨λ ⟨a, b⟩, to_fmt <$> (prod.mk <$> pp a <*> pp b)⟩
meta def option_to_tactic_format {α : Type u} [has_to_tactic_format α] : option α → tactic format
| (some a) := do fa ← pp a, return (to_fmt "(some " ++ fa ++ ")")
| none := return "none"
meta instance {α : Type u} [has_to_tactic_format α] : has_to_tactic_format (option α) :=
⟨option_to_tactic_format⟩
meta instance {α} (a : α) : has_to_tactic_format (reflected a) :=
⟨λ h, pp h.to_expr⟩
@[priority 10] meta instance has_to_format_to_has_to_tactic_format (α : Type) [has_to_format α] : has_to_tactic_format α :=
⟨(λ x, return x) ∘ to_fmt⟩
namespace tactic
open tactic_state
meta def get_env : tactic environment :=
do s ← read,
return $ env s
meta def get_decl (n : name) : tactic declaration :=
do s ← read,
(env s).get n
meta def trace {α : Type u} [has_to_tactic_format α] (a : α) : tactic unit :=
do fmt ← pp a,
return $ _root_.trace_fmt fmt (λ u, ())
meta def trace_call_stack : tactic unit :=
assume state, _root_.trace_call_stack (success () state)
meta def timetac {α : Type u} (desc : string) (t : thunk (tactic α)) : tactic α :=
λ s, timeit desc (t () s)
meta def trace_state : tactic unit :=
do s ← read,
trace $ to_fmt s
/-- A parameter representing how aggressively definitions should be unfolded when trying to decide if two terms match, unify or are definitionally equal.
By default, theorem declarations are never unfolded.
- `all` will unfold everything, including macros and theorems. Except projection macros.
- `semireducible` will unfold everything except theorems and definitions tagged as irreducible.
- `instances` will unfold all class instance definitions and definitions tagged with reducible.
- `reducible` will only unfold definitions tagged with the `reducible` attribute.
- `none` will never unfold anything.
[NOTE] You are not allowed to tag a definition with more than one of `reducible`, `irreducible`, `semireducible` attributes.
[NOTE] there is a config flag `m_unfold_lemmas`that will make it unfold theorems.
-/
inductive transparency
| all | semireducible | instances | reducible | none
export transparency (reducible semireducible)
/-- (eval_expr α e) evaluates 'e' IF 'e' has type 'α'. -/
meta constant eval_expr (α : Type u) [reflected α] : expr → tactic α
/-- Return the partial term/proof constructed so far. Note that the resultant expression
may contain variables that are not declarate in the current main goal. -/
meta constant result : tactic expr
/-- Display the partial term/proof constructed so far. This tactic is *not* equivalent to
`do { r ← result, s ← read, return (format_expr s r) }` because this one will format the result with respect
to the current goal, and trace_result will do it with respect to the initial goal. -/
meta constant format_result : tactic format
/-- Return target type of the main goal. Fail if tactic_state does not have any goal left. -/
meta constant target : tactic expr
meta constant intro_core : name → tactic expr
meta constant intron : nat → tactic unit
/-- Clear the given local constant. The tactic fails if the given expression is not a local constant. -/
meta constant clear : expr → tactic unit
/-- `revert_lst : list expr → tactic nat` is the reverse of `intron`. It takes a local constant `c` and puts it back as bound by a `pi` or `elet` of the main target.
If there are other local constants that depend on `c`, these are also reverted. Because of this, the `nat` that is returned is the actual number of reverted local constants.
Example: with `x : ℕ, h : P(x) ⊢ T(x)`, `revert_lst [x]` returns `2` and produces the state ` ⊢ Π x, P(x) → T(x)`.
-/
meta constant revert_lst : list expr → tactic nat
/-- Return `e` in weak head normal form with respect to the given transparency setting.
If `unfold_ginductive` is `tt`, then nested and/or mutually recursive inductive datatype constructors
and types are unfolded. Recall that nested and mutually recursive inductive datatype declarations
are compiled into primitive datatypes accepted by the Kernel. -/
meta constant whnf (e : expr) (md := semireducible) (unfold_ginductive := tt) : tactic expr
/-- (head) eta expand the given expression. `f : α → β` head-eta-expands to `λ a, f a`. If `f` isn't a function then it just returns `f`. -/
meta constant head_eta_expand : expr → tactic expr
/-- (head) beta reduction. `(λ x, B) c` reduces to `B[x/c]`. -/
meta constant head_beta : expr → tactic expr
/-- (head) zeta reduction. Reduction of let bindings at the head of the expression. `let x : a := b in c` reduces to `c[x/b]`. -/
meta constant head_zeta : expr → tactic expr
/-- Zeta reduction. Reduction of let bindings. `let x : a := b in c` reduces to `c[x/b]`. -/
meta constant zeta : expr → tactic expr
/-- (head) eta reduction. `(λ x, f x)` reduces to `f`. -/
meta constant head_eta : expr → tactic expr
/-- Succeeds if `t` and `s` can be unified using the given transparency setting. -/
meta constant unify (t s : expr) (md := semireducible) (approx := ff) : tactic unit
/-- Similar to `unify`, but it treats metavariables as constants. -/
meta constant is_def_eq (t s : expr) (md := semireducible) (approx := ff) : tactic unit
/-- Infer the type of the given expression.
Remark: transparency does not affect type inference -/
meta constant infer_type : expr → tactic expr
/-- Get the `local_const` expr for the given `name`. -/
meta constant get_local : name → tactic expr
/-- Resolve a name using the current local context, environment, aliases, etc. -/
meta constant resolve_name : name → tactic pexpr
/-- Return the hypothesis in the main goal. Fail if tactic_state does not have any goal left. -/
meta constant local_context : tactic (list expr)
/-- Get a fresh name that is guaranteed to not be in use in the local context.
If `n` is provided and `n` is not in use, then `n` is returned.
Otherwise a number `i` is appended to give `"n_i"`.
-/
meta constant get_unused_name (n : name := `_x) (i : option nat := none) : tactic name
/-- Helper tactic for creating simple applications where some arguments are inferred using
type inference.
Example, given
```
rel.{l_1 l_2} : Pi (α : Type.{l_1}) (β : α -> Type.{l_2}), (Pi x : α, β x) -> (Pi x : α, β x) -> , Prop
nat : Type
real : Type
vec.{l} : Pi (α : Type l) (n : nat), Type.{l1}
f g : Pi (n : nat), vec real n
```
then
```
mk_app_core semireducible "rel" [f, g]
```
returns the application
```
rel.{1 2} nat (fun n : nat, vec real n) f g
```
The unification constraints due to type inference are solved using the transparency `md`.
-/
meta constant mk_app (fn : name) (args : list expr) (md := semireducible) : tactic expr
/-- Similar to `mk_app`, but allows to specify which arguments are explicit/implicit.
Example, given `(a b : nat)` then
```
mk_mapp "ite" [some (a > b), none, none, some a, some b]
```
returns the application
```
@ite.{1} (a > b) (nat.decidable_gt a b) nat a b
```
-/
meta constant mk_mapp (fn : name) (args : list (option expr)) (md := semireducible) : tactic expr
/-- (mk_congr_arg h₁ h₂) is a more efficient version of (mk_app `congr_arg [h₁, h₂]) -/
meta constant mk_congr_arg : expr → expr → tactic expr
/-- (mk_congr_fun h₁ h₂) is a more efficient version of (mk_app `congr_fun [h₁, h₂]) -/
meta constant mk_congr_fun : expr → expr → tactic expr
/-- (mk_congr h₁ h₂) is a more efficient version of (mk_app `congr [h₁, h₂]) -/
meta constant mk_congr : expr → expr → tactic expr
/-- (mk_eq_refl h) is a more efficient version of (mk_app `eq.refl [h]) -/
meta constant mk_eq_refl : expr → tactic expr
/-- (mk_eq_symm h) is a more efficient version of (mk_app `eq.symm [h]) -/
meta constant mk_eq_symm : expr → tactic expr
/-- (mk_eq_trans h₁ h₂) is a more efficient version of (mk_app `eq.trans [h₁, h₂]) -/
meta constant mk_eq_trans : expr → expr → tactic expr
/-- (mk_eq_mp h₁ h₂) is a more efficient version of (mk_app `eq.mp [h₁, h₂]) -/
meta constant mk_eq_mp : expr → expr → tactic expr
/-- (mk_eq_mpr h₁ h₂) is a more efficient version of (mk_app `eq.mpr [h₁, h₂]) -/
meta constant mk_eq_mpr : expr → expr → tactic expr
/- Given a local constant t, if t has type (lhs = rhs) apply substitution.
Otherwise, try to find a local constant that has type of the form (t = t') or (t' = t).
The tactic fails if the given expression is not a local constant. -/
meta constant subst_core : expr → tactic unit
/-- Close the current goal using `e`. Fail is the type of `e` is not definitionally equal to
the target type. -/
meta constant exact (e : expr) (md := semireducible) : tactic unit
/-- Elaborate the given quoted expression with respect to the current main goal.
Note that this means that any implicit arguments for the given `pexpr` will be applied with fresh metavariables.
If `allow_mvars` is tt, then metavariables are tolerated and become new goals if `subgoals` is tt. -/
meta constant to_expr (q : pexpr) (allow_mvars := tt) (subgoals := tt) : tactic expr
/-- Return true if the given expression is a type class. -/
meta constant is_class : expr → tactic bool
/-- Try to create an instance of the given type class. -/
meta constant mk_instance : expr → tactic expr
/-- Change the target of the main goal.
The input expression must be definitionally equal to the current target.
If `check` is `ff`, then the tactic does not check whether `e`
is definitionally equal to the current target. If it is not,
then the error will only be detected by the kernel type checker. -/
meta constant change (e : expr) (check : bool := tt): tactic unit
/-- `assert_core H T`, adds a new goal for T, and change target to `T -> target`. -/
meta constant assert_core : name → expr → tactic unit
/-- `assertv_core H T P`, change target to (T -> target) if P has type T. -/
meta constant assertv_core : name → expr → expr → tactic unit
/-- `define_core H T`, adds a new goal for T, and change target to `let H : T := ?M in target` in the current goal. -/
meta constant define_core : name → expr → tactic unit
/-- `definev_core H T P`, change target to `let H : T := P in target` if P has type T. -/
meta constant definev_core : name → expr → expr → tactic unit
/-- Rotate goals to the left. That is, `rotate_left 1` takes the main goal and puts it to the back of the subgoal list. -/
meta constant rotate_left : nat → tactic unit
/-- Gets a list of metavariables, one for each goal. -/
meta constant get_goals : tactic (list expr)
/-- Replace the current list of goals with the given one. Each expr in the list should be a metavariable. Any assigned metavariables will be ignored.-/
meta constant set_goals : list expr → tactic unit
/-- How to order the new goals made from an `apply` tactic.
Supposing we were applying `e : ∀ (a:α) (p : P(a)), Q`
- `non_dep_first` would produce goals `⊢ P(?m)`, `⊢ α`. It puts the P goal at the front because none of the arguments after `p` in `e` depend on `p`. It doesn't matter what the result `Q` depends on.
- `non_dep_only` would produce goal `⊢ P(?m)`.
- `all` would produce goals `⊢ α`, `⊢ P(?m)`.
-/
inductive new_goals
| non_dep_first | non_dep_only | all
/-- Configuration options for the `apply` tactic.
- `md` sets how aggressively definitions are unfolded.
- `new_goals` is the strategy for ordering new goals.
- `instances` if `tt`, then `apply` tries to synthesize unresolved `[...]` arguments using type class resolution.
- `auto_param` if `tt`, then `apply` tries to synthesize unresolved `(h : p . tac_id)` arguments using tactic `tac_id`.
- `opt_param` if `tt`, then `apply` tries to synthesize unresolved `(a : t := v)` arguments by setting them to `v`.
- `unify` if `tt`, then `apply` is free to assign existing metavariables in the goal when solving unification constraints.
For example, in the goal `|- ?x < succ 0`, the tactic `apply succ_lt_succ` succeeds with the default configuration,
but `apply_with succ_lt_succ {unify := ff}` doesn't since it would require Lean to assign `?x` to `succ ?y` where
`?y` is a fresh metavariable.
-/
structure apply_cfg :=
(md := semireducible)
(approx := tt)
(new_goals := new_goals.non_dep_first)
(instances := tt)
(auto_param := tt)
(opt_param := tt)
(unify := tt)
/-- Apply the expression `e` to the main goal, the unification is performed using the transparency mode in `cfg`.
Supposing `e : Π (a₁:α₁) ... (aₙ:αₙ), P(a₁,...,aₙ)` and the target is `Q`, `apply` will attempt to unify `Q` with `P(?a₁,...?aₙ)`.
All of the metavariables that are not assigned are added as new metavariables.
If `cfg.approx` is `tt`, then fallback to first-order unification, and approximate context during unification.
`cfg.new_goals` specifies which unassigned metavariables become new goals, and their order.
If `cfg.instances` is `tt`, then use type class resolution to instantiate unassigned meta-variables.
The fields `cfg.auto_param` and `cfg.opt_param` are ignored by this tactic (See `tactic.apply`).
It returns a list of all introduced meta variables and the parameter name associated with them, even the assigned ones. -/
meta constant apply_core (e : expr) (cfg : apply_cfg := {}) : tactic (list (name × expr))
/- Create a fresh meta universe variable. -/
meta constant mk_meta_univ : tactic level
/- Create a fresh meta-variable with the given type.
The scope of the new meta-variable is the local context of the main goal. -/
meta constant mk_meta_var : expr → tactic expr
/-- Return the value assigned to the given universe meta-variable.
Fail if argument is not an universe meta-variable or if it is not assigned. -/
meta constant get_univ_assignment : level → tactic level
/-- Return the value assigned to the given meta-variable.
Fail if argument is not a meta-variable or if it is not assigned. -/
meta constant get_assignment : expr → tactic expr
/-- Return true if the given meta-variable is assigned.
Fail if argument is not a meta-variable. -/
meta constant is_assigned : expr → tactic bool
/-- Make a name that is guaranteed to be unique. Eg `_fresh.1001.4667`. These will be different for each run of the tactic. -/
meta constant mk_fresh_name : tactic name
/-- Induction on `h` using recursor `rec`, names for the new hypotheses
are retrieved from `ns`. If `ns` does not have sufficient names, then use the internal binder names
in the recursor.
It returns for each new goal the name of the constructor (if `rec_name` is a builtin recursor),
a list of new hypotheses, and a list of substitutions for hypotheses
depending on `h`. The substitutions map internal names to their replacement terms. If the
replacement is again a hypothesis the user name stays the same. The internal names are only valid
in the original goal, not in the type context of the new goal.
Remark: if `rec_name` is not a builtin recursor, we use parameter names of `rec_name` instead of
constructor names.
If `rec` is none, then the type of `h` is inferred, if it is of the form `C ...`, tactic uses `C.rec` -/
meta constant induction (h : expr) (ns : list name := []) (rec : option name := none) (md := semireducible) : tactic (list (name × list expr × list (name × expr)))
/-- Apply `cases_on` recursor, names for the new hypotheses are retrieved from `ns`.
`h` must be a local constant. It returns for each new goal the name of the constructor, a list of new hypotheses, and a list of
substitutions for hypotheses depending on `h`. The number of new goals may be smaller than the
number of constructors. Some goals may be discarded when the indices to not match.
See `induction` for information on the list of substitutions.
The `cases` tactic is implemented using this one, and it relaxes the restriction of `h`. -/
meta constant cases_core (h : expr) (ns : list name := []) (md := semireducible) : tactic (list (name × list expr × list (name × expr)))
/-- Similar to cases tactic, but does not revert/intro/clear hypotheses. -/
meta constant destruct (e : expr) (md := semireducible) : tactic unit
/-- Generalizes the target with respect to `e`. -/
meta constant generalize (e : expr) (n : name := `_x) (md := semireducible) : tactic unit
/-- instantiate assigned metavariables in the given expression -/
meta constant instantiate_mvars : expr → tactic expr
/-- Add the given declaration to the environment -/
meta constant add_decl : declaration → tactic unit
/--
Changes the environment to the `new_env`.
The new environment does not need to be a descendant of the old one.
Use with care.
-/
meta constant set_env_core : environment → tactic unit
/-- Changes the environment to the `new_env`. `new_env` needs to be a descendant from the current environment. -/
meta constant set_env : environment → tactic unit
/-- `doc_string env d k` returns the doc string for `d` (if available) -/
meta constant doc_string : name → tactic string
/-- Set the docstring for the given declaration. -/
meta constant add_doc_string : name → string → tactic unit
/--
Create an auxiliary definition with name `c` where `type` and `value` may contain local constants and
meta-variables. This function collects all dependencies (universe parameters, universe metavariables,
local constants (aka hypotheses) and metavariables).
It updates the environment in the tactic_state, and returns an expression of the form
(c.{l_1 ... l_n} a_1 ... a_m)
where l_i's and a_j's are the collected dependencies.
-/
meta constant add_aux_decl (c : name) (type : expr) (val : expr) (is_lemma : bool) : tactic expr
/-- Returns a list of all top-level (`/-! ... -/`) docstrings in the active module and imported ones.
The returned object is a list of modules, indexed by `(some filename)` for imported modules
and `none` for the active one, where each module in the list is paired with a list
of `(position_in_file, docstring)` pairs. -/
meta constant olean_doc_strings : tactic (list (option string × (list (pos × string))))
/-- Returns a list of docstrings in the active module. An entry in the list can be either:
- a top-level (`/-! ... -/`) docstring, represented as `(none, docstring)`
- a declaration-specific (`/-- ... -/`) docstring, represented as `(some decl_name, docstring)` -/
meta def module_doc_strings : tactic (list (option name × string)) :=
do
/- Obtain a list of top-level docs in current module. -/
mod_docs ← olean_doc_strings,
let mod_docs: list (list (option name × string)) :=
mod_docs.filter_map (λ d,
if d.1.is_none
then some (d.2.map
(λ pos_doc, ⟨none, pos_doc.2⟩))
else none),
let mod_docs := mod_docs.join,
/- Obtain list of declarations in current module. -/
e ← get_env,
let decls := environment.fold e ([]: list name)
(λ d acc, let n := d.to_name in
if (environment.decl_olean e n).is_none
then n::acc else acc),
/- Map declarations to those which have docstrings. -/
decls ← decls.mfoldl (λa n,
(doc_string n >>=
λ doc, pure $ (some n, doc) :: a)
<|> pure a) [],
pure (mod_docs ++ decls)
/-- Set attribute `attr_name` for constant `c_name` with the given priority.
If the priority is none, then use default -/
meta constant set_basic_attribute (attr_name : name) (c_name : name) (persistent := ff) (prio : option nat := none) : tactic unit
/-- `unset_attribute attr_name c_name` -/
meta constant unset_attribute : name → name → tactic unit
/-- `has_attribute attr_name c_name` succeeds if the declaration `decl_name`
has the attribute `attr_name`. The result is the priority and whether or not
the attribute is persistent. -/
meta constant has_attribute : name → name → tactic (bool × nat)
/-- `copy_attribute attr_name c_name p d_name` copy attribute `attr_name` from
`src` to `tgt` if it is defined for `src`; make it persistent if `p` is `tt`;
if `p` is `none`, the copied attribute is made persistent iff it is persistent on `src` -/
meta def copy_attribute (attr_name : name) (src : name) (tgt : name) (p : option bool := none) : tactic unit :=
try $ do
(p', prio) ← has_attribute attr_name src,
let p := p.get_or_else p',
set_basic_attribute attr_name tgt p (some prio)
/-- Name of the declaration currently being elaborated. -/
meta constant decl_name : tactic name
/-- `save_type_info e ref` save (typeof e) at position associated with ref -/
meta constant save_type_info {elab : bool} : expr → expr elab → tactic unit
meta constant save_info_thunk : pos → (unit → format) → tactic unit
/-- Return list of currently open namespaces -/
meta constant open_namespaces : tactic (list name)
/-- Return tt iff `t` "occurs" in `e`. The occurrence checking is performed using
keyed matching with the given transparency setting.
We say `t` occurs in `e` by keyed matching iff there is a subterm `s`
s.t. `t` and `s` have the same head, and `is_def_eq t s md`
The main idea is to minimize the number of `is_def_eq` checks
performed. -/
meta constant kdepends_on (e t : expr) (md := reducible) : tactic bool
/-- Abstracts all occurrences of the term `t` in `e` using keyed matching.
If `unify` is `ff`, then matching is used instead of unification.
That is, metavariables occurring in `e` are not assigned. -/
meta constant kabstract (e t : expr) (md := reducible) (unify := tt) : tactic expr
/-- Blocks the execution of the current thread for at least `msecs` milliseconds.
This tactic is used mainly for debugging purposes. -/
meta constant sleep (msecs : nat) : tactic unit
/-- Type check `e` with respect to the current goal.
Fails if `e` is not type correct. -/
meta constant type_check (e : expr) (md := semireducible) : tactic unit
open list nat
/-- A `tag` is a list of `names`. These are attached to goals to help tactics track them.-/
def tag : Type := list name
/-- Enable/disable goal tagging. -/
meta constant enable_tags (b : bool) : tactic unit
/-- Return tt iff goal tagging is enabled. -/
meta constant tags_enabled : tactic bool
/-- Tag goal `g` with tag `t`. It does nothing if goal tagging is disabled.
Remark: `set_goal g []` removes the tag -/
meta constant set_tag (g : expr) (t : tag) : tactic unit
/-- Return tag associated with `g`. Return `[]` if there is no tag. -/
meta constant get_tag (g : expr) : tactic tag
/-- By default, Lean only considers local instances in the header of declarations.
This has two main benefits.
1- Results produced by the type class resolution procedure can be easily cached.
2- The set of local instances does not have to be recomputed.
This approach has the following disadvantages:
1- Frozen local instances cannot be reverted.
2- Local instances defined inside of a declaration are not considered during type
class resolution.
This tactic resets the set of local instances. After executing this tactic,
the set of local instances will be recomputed and the cache will be frequently
reset. Note that, the cache is still used when executing a single tactic that
may generate many type class resolution problems (e.g., `simp`). -/
meta constant unfreeze_local_instances : tactic unit
/- Return the list of frozen local instances. Return `none` if local instances were not frozen. -/
meta constant frozen_local_instances : tactic (option (list expr))
meta def induction' (h : expr) (ns : list name := []) (rec : option name := none) (md := semireducible) : tactic unit :=
induction h ns rec md >> return ()
/-- Remark: set_goals will erase any solved goal -/
meta def cleanup : tactic unit :=
get_goals >>= set_goals
/-- Auxiliary definition used to implement begin ... end blocks -/
meta def step {α : Type u} (t : tactic α) : tactic unit :=
t >>[tactic] cleanup
meta def istep {α : Type u} (line0 col0 : ℕ) (line col : ℕ) (t : tactic α) : tactic unit :=
λ s, (@scope_trace _ line col (λ _, step t s)).clamp_pos line0 line col
meta def is_prop (e : expr) : tactic bool :=
do t ← infer_type e,
return (t = `(Prop))
/-- Return true iff n is the name of declaration that is a proposition. -/
meta def is_prop_decl (n : name) : tactic bool :=
do env ← get_env,
d ← env.get n,
t ← return $ d.type,
is_prop t
meta def is_proof (e : expr) : tactic bool :=
infer_type e >>= is_prop
meta def whnf_no_delta (e : expr) : tactic expr :=
whnf e transparency.none
/-- Return `e` in weak head normal form with respect to the given transparency setting,
or `e` head is a generalized constructor or inductive datatype. -/
meta def whnf_ginductive (e : expr) (md := semireducible) : tactic expr :=
whnf e md ff
meta def whnf_target : tactic unit :=
target >>= whnf >>= change
/-- Change the target of the main goal.
The input expression must be definitionally equal to the current target.
The tactic does not check whether `e`
is definitionally equal to the current target. The error will only be detected by the kernel type checker. -/
meta def unsafe_change (e : expr) : tactic unit :=
change e ff
/-- Pi or elet introduction.
Given the tactic state `⊢ Π x : α, Y`, ``intro `hello`` will produce the state `hello : α ⊢ Y[x/hello]`.
Returns the new local constant. Similarly for `elet` expressions.
If the target is not a Pi or elet it will try to put it in WHNF.
-/
meta def intro (n : name) : tactic expr :=
do t ← target,
if expr.is_pi t ∨ expr.is_let t then intro_core n
else whnf_target >> intro_core n
/-- Like `intro` except the name is derived from the bound name in the Π. -/
meta def intro1 : tactic expr :=
intro `_
/-- Repeatedly apply `intro1` and return the list of new local constants in order of introduction.-/
meta def intros : tactic (list expr) :=
do t ← target,
match t with
| expr.pi _ _ _ _ := do H ← intro1, Hs ← intros, return (H :: Hs)
| expr.elet _ _ _ _ := do H ← intro1, Hs ← intros, return (H :: Hs)
| _ := return []
end
/-- Same as `intros`, except with the given names for the new hypotheses. Use the name ```_``` to instead use the binder's name.-/
meta def intro_lst : list name → tactic (list expr)
| [] := return []
| (n::ns) := do H ← intro n, Hs ← intro_lst ns, return (H :: Hs)
/-- Introduces new hypotheses with forward dependencies. -/
meta def intros_dep : tactic (list expr) :=
do t ← target,
let proc (b : expr) :=
if b.has_var_idx 0 then
do h ← intro1, hs ← intros_dep, return (h::hs)
else
-- body doesn't depend on new hypothesis
return [],
match t with
| expr.pi _ _ _ b := proc b
| expr.elet _ _ _ b := proc b
| _ := return []
end
meta def introv : list name → tactic (list expr)
| [] := intros_dep
| (n::ns) := do hs ← intros_dep, h ← intro n, hs' ← introv ns, return (hs ++ h :: hs')
/-- Returns n fully qualified if it refers to a constant, or else fails. -/
meta def resolve_constant (n : name) : tactic name :=
do (expr.const n _) ← resolve_name n,
pure n
meta def to_expr_strict (q : pexpr) : tactic expr :=
to_expr q
/--
Example: with `x : ℕ, h : P(x) ⊢ T(x)`, `revert x` returns `2` and produces the state ` ⊢ Π x, P(x) → T(x)`.
-/
meta def revert (l : expr) : tactic nat :=
revert_lst [l]
/- Revert "all" hypotheses. Actually, the tactic only reverts
hypotheses occurring after the last frozen local instance.
Recall that frozen local instances cannot be reverted.
We can use `unfreeze_local_instances` to workaround this limitation. -/
meta def revert_all : tactic nat :=
do lctx ← local_context,
lis ← frozen_local_instances,
match lis with
| none := revert_lst lctx
| some [] := revert_lst lctx
/- `hi` is the last local instance. We shoul truncate `lctx` at `hi`. -/
| some (hi::his) := revert_lst $ lctx.foldl (λ r h, if h.local_uniq_name = hi.local_uniq_name then [] else h :: r) []
end
meta def clear_lst : list name → tactic unit
| [] := skip
| (n::ns) := do H ← get_local n, clear H, clear_lst ns
meta def match_not (e : expr) : tactic expr :=
match (expr.is_not e) with
| (some a) := return a
| none := fail "expression is not a negation"
end
meta def match_and (e : expr) : tactic (expr × expr) :=
match (expr.is_and e) with
| (some (α, β)) := return (α, β)
| none := fail "expression is not a conjunction"
end
meta def match_or (e : expr) : tactic (expr × expr) :=
match (expr.is_or e) with
| (some (α, β)) := return (α, β)
| none := fail "expression is not a disjunction"
end
meta def match_iff (e : expr) : tactic (expr × expr) :=
match (expr.is_iff e) with
| (some (lhs, rhs)) := return (lhs, rhs)
| none := fail "expression is not an iff"
end
meta def match_eq (e : expr) : tactic (expr × expr) :=
match (expr.is_eq e) with
| (some (lhs, rhs)) := return (lhs, rhs)
| none := fail "expression is not an equality"
end
meta def match_ne (e : expr) : tactic (expr × expr) :=
match (expr.is_ne e) with
| (some (lhs, rhs)) := return (lhs, rhs)
| none := fail "expression is not a disequality"
end
meta def match_heq (e : expr) : tactic (expr × expr × expr × expr) :=
do match (expr.is_heq e) with
| (some (α, lhs, β, rhs)) := return (α, lhs, β, rhs)
| none := fail "expression is not a heterogeneous equality"
end
meta def match_refl_app (e : expr) : tactic (name × expr × expr) :=
do env ← get_env,
match (environment.is_refl_app env e) with
| (some (R, lhs, rhs)) := return (R, lhs, rhs)
| none := fail "expression is not an application of a reflexive relation"
end
meta def match_app_of (e : expr) (n : name) : tactic (list expr) :=
guard (expr.is_app_of e n) >> return e.get_app_args
meta def get_local_type (n : name) : tactic expr :=
get_local n >>= infer_type
meta def trace_result : tactic unit :=
format_result >>= trace
meta def rexact (e : expr) : tactic unit :=
exact e reducible
meta def any_hyp_aux {α : Type} (f : expr → tactic α) : list expr → tactic α
| [] := failed
| (h :: hs) := f h <|> any_hyp_aux hs
meta def any_hyp {α : Type} (f : expr → tactic α) : tactic α :=
local_context >>= any_hyp_aux f
/-- `find_same_type t es` tries to find in es an expression with type definitionally equal to t -/
meta def find_same_type : expr → list expr → tactic expr
| e [] := failed
| e (H :: Hs) :=
do t ← infer_type H,
(unify e t >> return H) <|> find_same_type e Hs
meta def find_assumption (e : expr) : tactic expr :=
do ctx ← local_context, find_same_type e ctx
meta def assumption : tactic unit :=
do { ctx ← local_context,
t ← target,
H ← find_same_type t ctx,
exact H }
<|> fail "assumption tactic failed"
meta def save_info (p : pos) : tactic unit :=
do s ← read,
tactic.save_info_thunk p (λ _, tactic_state.to_format s)
notation `‹` p `›` := (by assumption : p)
/-- Swap first two goals, do nothing if tactic state does not have at least two goals. -/
meta def swap : tactic unit :=
do gs ← get_goals,
match gs with
| (g₁ :: g₂ :: rs) := set_goals (g₂ :: g₁ :: rs)
| e := skip
end
/-- `assert h t`, adds a new goal for t, and the hypothesis `h : t` in the current goal. -/
meta def assert (h : name) (t : expr) : tactic expr :=
do assert_core h t, swap, e ← intro h, swap, return e
/-- `assertv h t v`, adds the hypothesis `h : t` in the current goal if v has type t. -/
meta def assertv (h : name) (t : expr) (v : expr) : tactic expr :=
assertv_core h t v >> intro h
/-- `define h t`, adds a new goal for t, and the hypothesis `h : t := ?M` in the current goal. -/
meta def define (h : name) (t : expr) : tactic expr :=
do define_core h t, swap, e ← intro h, swap, return e
/-- `definev h t v`, adds the hypothesis (h : t := v) in the current goal if v has type t. -/
meta def definev (h : name) (t : expr) (v : expr) : tactic expr :=
definev_core h t v >> intro h
/-- Add `h : t := pr` to the current goal -/
meta def pose (h : name) (t : option expr := none) (pr : expr) : tactic expr :=
let dv := λt, definev h t pr in
option.cases_on t (infer_type pr >>= dv) dv
/-- Add `h : t` to the current goal, given a proof `pr : t` -/
meta def note (h : name) (t : option expr := none) (pr : expr) : tactic expr :=
let dv := λt, assertv h t pr in
option.cases_on t (infer_type pr >>= dv) dv
/-- Return the number of goals that need to be solved -/
meta def num_goals : tactic nat :=
do gs ← get_goals,
return (length gs)
/-- Rotate the goals to the right by `n`. That is, take the goal at the back and push it to the front `n` times.
[NOTE] We have to provide the instance argument `[has_mod nat]` because
mod for nat was not defined yet -/
meta def rotate_right (n : nat) [has_mod nat] : tactic unit :=
do ng ← num_goals,
if ng = 0 then skip
else rotate_left (ng - n % ng)
/-- Rotate the goals to the left by `n`. That is, put the main goal to the back `n` times. -/
meta def rotate : nat → tactic unit :=
rotate_left
private meta def repeat_aux (t : tactic unit) : list expr → list expr → tactic unit
| [] r := set_goals r.reverse
| (g::gs) r := do
ok ← try_core (set_goals [g] >> t),
match ok with
| none := repeat_aux gs (g::r)
| _ := do
gs' ← get_goals,
repeat_aux (gs' ++ gs) r
end
/-- This tactic is applied to each goal. If the application succeeds,
the tactic is applied recursively to all the generated subgoals until it eventually fails.
The recursion stops in a subgoal when the tactic has failed to make progress.
The tactic `repeat` never fails. -/
meta def repeat (t : tactic unit) : tactic unit :=
do gs ← get_goals, repeat_aux t gs []
/-- `first [t_1, ..., t_n]` applies the first tactic that doesn't fail.
The tactic fails if all t_i's fail. -/
meta def first {α : Type u} : list (tactic α) → tactic α
| [] := fail "first tactic failed, no more alternatives"
| (t::ts) := t <|> first ts
/-- Applies the given tactic to the main goal and fails if it is not solved. -/
meta def solve1 (tac : tactic unit) : tactic unit :=
do gs ← get_goals,
match gs with
| [] := fail "solve1 tactic failed, there isn't any goal left to focus"
| (g::rs) :=
do set_goals [g],
tac,
gs' ← get_goals,
match gs' with
| [] := set_goals rs
| gs := fail "solve1 tactic failed, focused goal has not been solved"
end
end
/-- `solve [t_1, ... t_n]` applies the first tactic that solves the main goal. -/
meta def solve (ts : list (tactic unit)) : tactic unit :=
first $ map solve1 ts
private meta def focus_aux : list (tactic unit) → list expr → list expr → tactic unit
| [] [] rs := set_goals rs
| (t::ts) [] rs := fail "focus tactic failed, insufficient number of goals"
| tts (g::gs) rs :=
mcond (is_assigned g) (focus_aux tts gs rs) $
do set_goals [g],
t::ts ← pure tts | fail "focus tactic failed, insufficient number of tactics",
t,
rs' ← get_goals,
focus_aux ts gs (rs ++ rs')
/-- `focus [t_1, ..., t_n]` applies t_i to the i-th goal. Fails if the number of goals is not n. -/
meta def focus (ts : list (tactic unit)) : tactic unit :=
do gs ← get_goals, focus_aux ts gs []
meta def focus1 {α} (tac : tactic α) : tactic α :=
do g::gs ← get_goals,
match gs with
| [] := tac
| _ := do
set_goals [g],
a ← tac,
gs' ← get_goals,
set_goals (gs' ++ gs),
return a
end
private meta def all_goals_core (tac : tactic unit) : list expr → list expr → tactic unit
| [] ac := set_goals ac
| (g :: gs) ac :=
mcond (is_assigned g) (all_goals_core gs ac) $
do set_goals [g],
tac,
new_gs ← get_goals,
all_goals_core gs (ac ++ new_gs)
/-- Apply the given tactic to all goals. -/
meta def all_goals (tac : tactic unit) : tactic unit :=
do gs ← get_goals,
all_goals_core tac gs []
private meta def any_goals_core (tac : tactic unit) : list expr → list expr → bool → tactic unit
| [] ac progress := guard progress >> set_goals ac
| (g :: gs) ac progress :=
mcond (is_assigned g) (any_goals_core gs ac progress) $
do set_goals [g],
succeeded ← try_core tac,
new_gs ← get_goals,
any_goals_core gs (ac ++ new_gs) (succeeded.is_some || progress)
/-- Apply the given tactic to any goal where it succeeds. The tactic succeeds only if
tac succeeds for at least one goal. -/
meta def any_goals (tac : tactic unit) : tactic unit :=
do gs ← get_goals,
any_goals_core tac gs [] ff
/-- LCF-style AND_THEN tactic. It applies tac1, and if succeed applies tac2 to each subgoal produced by tac1 -/
meta def seq (tac1 : tactic unit) (tac2 : tactic unit) : tactic unit :=
do g::gs ← get_goals,
set_goals [g],
tac1, all_goals tac2,
gs' ← get_goals,
set_goals (gs' ++ gs)
meta def seq_focus (tac1 : tactic unit) (tacs2 : list (tactic unit)) : tactic unit :=
do g::gs ← get_goals,
set_goals [g],
tac1, focus tacs2,
gs' ← get_goals,
set_goals (gs' ++ gs)
meta instance andthen_seq : has_andthen (tactic unit) (tactic unit) (tactic unit) :=
⟨seq⟩
meta instance andthen_seq_focus : has_andthen (tactic unit) (list (tactic unit)) (tactic unit) :=
⟨seq_focus⟩
meta constant is_trace_enabled_for : name → bool
/-- Execute tac only if option trace.n is set to true. -/
meta def when_tracing (n : name) (tac : tactic unit) : tactic unit :=
when (is_trace_enabled_for n = tt) tac
/-- Fail if there are no remaining goals. -/
meta def fail_if_no_goals : tactic unit :=
do n ← num_goals,
when (n = 0) (fail "tactic failed, there are no goals to be solved")
/-- Fail if there are unsolved goals. -/
meta def done : tactic unit :=
do n ← num_goals,
when (n ≠ 0) (fail "done tactic failed, there are unsolved goals")
meta def apply_opt_param : tactic unit :=
do `(opt_param %%t %%v) ← target,
exact v
meta def apply_auto_param : tactic unit :=
do `(auto_param %%type %%tac_name_expr) ← target,
change type,
tac_name ← eval_expr name tac_name_expr,
tac ← eval_expr (tactic unit) (expr.const tac_name []),
tac
meta def has_opt_auto_param (ms : list expr) : tactic bool :=
ms.mfoldl
(λ r m, do type ← infer_type m,
return $ r || type.is_napp_of `opt_param 2 || type.is_napp_of `auto_param 2)
ff
meta def try_apply_opt_auto_param (cfg : apply_cfg) (ms : list expr) : tactic unit :=
when (cfg.auto_param || cfg.opt_param) $
mwhen (has_opt_auto_param ms) $ do
gs ← get_goals,
ms.mmap' (λ m, mwhen (bnot <$> is_assigned m) $
set_goals [m] >>
when cfg.opt_param (try apply_opt_param) >>
when cfg.auto_param (try apply_auto_param)),
set_goals gs
meta def has_opt_auto_param_for_apply (ms : list (name × expr)) : tactic bool :=
ms.mfoldl
(λ r m, do type ← infer_type m.2,
return $ r || type.is_napp_of `opt_param 2 || type.is_napp_of `auto_param 2)
ff
meta def try_apply_opt_auto_param_for_apply (cfg : apply_cfg) (ms : list (name × expr)) : tactic unit :=
mwhen (has_opt_auto_param_for_apply ms) $ do
gs ← get_goals,
ms.mmap' (λ m, mwhen (bnot <$> (is_assigned m.2)) $
set_goals [m.2] >>
when cfg.opt_param (try apply_opt_param) >>
when cfg.auto_param (try apply_auto_param)),
set_goals gs
meta def apply (e : expr) (cfg : apply_cfg := {}) : tactic (list (name × expr)) :=
do r ← apply_core e cfg,
try_apply_opt_auto_param_for_apply cfg r,
return r
/-- Same as `apply` but __all__ arguments that weren't inferred are added to goal list. -/
meta def fapply (e : expr) : tactic (list (name × expr)) :=
apply e {new_goals := new_goals.all}
/-- Same as `apply` but only goals that don't depend on other goals are added to goal list. -/
meta def eapply (e : expr) : tactic (list (name × expr)) :=
apply e {new_goals := new_goals.non_dep_only}
/-- Try to solve the main goal using type class resolution. -/
meta def apply_instance : tactic unit :=
do tgt ← target >>= instantiate_mvars,
b ← is_class tgt,
if b then mk_instance tgt >>= exact
else fail "apply_instance tactic fail, target is not a type class"
/-- Create a list of universe meta-variables of the given size. -/
meta def mk_num_meta_univs : nat → tactic (list level)
| 0 := return []
| (succ n) := do
l ← mk_meta_univ,
ls ← mk_num_meta_univs n,
return (l::ls)
/-- Return `expr.const c [l_1, ..., l_n]` where l_i's are fresh universe meta-variables. -/
meta def mk_const (c : name) : tactic expr :=
do env ← get_env,
decl ← env.get c,
let num := decl.univ_params.length,
ls ← mk_num_meta_univs num,
return (expr.const c ls)
/-- Apply the constant `c` -/
meta def applyc (c : name) (cfg : apply_cfg := {}) : tactic unit :=
do c ← mk_const c, apply c cfg, skip
meta def eapplyc (c : name) : tactic unit :=
do c ← mk_const c, eapply c, skip
meta def save_const_type_info (n : name) {elab : bool} (ref : expr elab) : tactic unit :=
try (do c ← mk_const n, save_type_info c ref)
/-- Create a fresh universe `?u`, a metavariable `?T : Type.{?u}`,
and return metavariable `?M : ?T`.
This action can be used to create a meta-variable when
we don't know its type at creation time -/
meta def mk_mvar : tactic expr :=
do u ← mk_meta_univ,
t ← mk_meta_var (expr.sort u),
mk_meta_var t
/-- Makes a sorry macro with a meta-variable as its type. -/
meta def mk_sorry : tactic expr := do
u ← mk_meta_univ,
t ← mk_meta_var (expr.sort u),
return $ expr.mk_sorry t
/-- Closes the main goal using sorry. -/
meta def admit : tactic unit :=
target >>= exact ∘ expr.mk_sorry
meta def mk_local' (pp_name : name) (bi : binder_info) (type : expr) : tactic expr := do
uniq_name ← mk_fresh_name,
return $ expr.local_const uniq_name pp_name bi type
meta def mk_local_def (pp_name : name) (type : expr) : tactic expr :=
mk_local' pp_name binder_info.default type
meta def mk_local_pis : expr → tactic (list expr × expr)
| (expr.pi n bi d b) := do
p ← mk_local' n bi d,
(ps, r) ← mk_local_pis (expr.instantiate_var b p),
return ((p :: ps), r)
| e := return ([], e)
private meta def get_pi_arity_aux : expr → tactic nat
| (expr.pi n bi d b) :=
do m ← mk_fresh_name,
let l := expr.local_const m n bi d,
new_b ← whnf (expr.instantiate_var b l),
r ← get_pi_arity_aux new_b,
return (r + 1)
| e := return 0
/-- Compute the arity of the given (Pi-)type -/
meta def get_pi_arity (type : expr) : tactic nat :=
whnf type >>= get_pi_arity_aux
/-- Compute the arity of the given function -/
meta def get_arity (fn : expr) : tactic nat :=
infer_type fn >>= get_pi_arity
meta def triv : tactic unit := mk_const `trivial >>= exact
notation `dec_trivial` := of_as_true (by tactic.triv)
meta def by_contradiction (H : option name := none) : tactic expr :=
do tgt : expr ← target,
(match_not tgt >> return ())
<|>
(mk_mapp `decidable.by_contradiction [some tgt, none] >>= eapply >> skip)
<|>
fail "tactic by_contradiction failed, target is not a negation nor a decidable proposition (remark: when 'local attribute [instance] classical.prop_decidable' is used, all propositions are decidable)",
match H with
| some n := intro n
| none := intro1
end
private meta def generalizes_aux (md : transparency) : list expr → tactic unit
| [] := skip
| (e::es) := generalize e `x md >> generalizes_aux es
meta def generalizes (es : list expr) (md := semireducible) : tactic unit :=
generalizes_aux md es
private meta def kdependencies_core (e : expr) (md : transparency) : list expr → list expr → tactic (list expr)
| [] r := return r
| (h::hs) r :=
do type ← infer_type h,
d ← kdepends_on type e md,
if d then kdependencies_core hs (h::r)
else kdependencies_core hs r
/-- Return all hypotheses that depends on `e`
The dependency test is performed using `kdepends_on` with the given transparency setting. -/
meta def kdependencies (e : expr) (md := reducible) : tactic (list expr) :=
do ctx ← local_context, kdependencies_core e md ctx []
/-- Revert all hypotheses that depend on `e` -/
meta def revert_kdependencies (e : expr) (md := reducible) : tactic nat :=
kdependencies e md >>= revert_lst
meta def revert_kdeps (e : expr) (md := reducible) :=
revert_kdependencies e md
/-- Similar to `cases_core`, but `e` doesn't need to be a hypothesis.
Remark, it reverts dependencies using `revert_kdeps`.
Two different transparency modes are used `md` and `dmd`.
The mode `md` is used with `cases_core` and `dmd` with `generalize` and `revert_kdeps`.
It returns the constructor names associated with each new goal. -/
meta def cases (e : expr) (ids : list name := []) (md := semireducible) (dmd := semireducible) : tactic (list name) :=
if e.is_local_constant then
do r ← cases_core e ids md, return $ r.map (λ t, t.1)
else do
n ← revert_kdependencies e dmd,
x ← get_unused_name,
(tactic.generalize e x dmd)
<|>
(do t ← infer_type e,
tactic.assertv x t e,
get_local x >>= tactic.revert,
return ()),
h ← tactic.intro1,
focus1 (do r ← cases_core h ids md, all_goals (intron n), return $ r.map (λ t, t.1))
/-- The same as `exact` except you can add proof holes. -/
meta def refine (e : pexpr) : tactic unit :=
do tgt : expr ← target,
to_expr ``(%%e : %%tgt) tt >>= exact
meta def by_cases (e : expr) (h : name) : tactic unit :=
do dec_e ← (mk_app `decidable [e] <|> fail "by_cases tactic failed, type is not a proposition"),
inst ← (mk_instance dec_e <|> fail "by_cases tactic failed, type of given expression is not decidable"),
t ← target,
tm ← mk_mapp `dite [some e, some inst, some t],
seq (apply tm >> skip) (intro h >> skip)
meta def funext_core : list name → bool → tactic unit
| [] tt := return ()
| ids only_ids := try $
do some (lhs, rhs) ← expr.is_eq <$> (target >>= whnf),
applyc `funext,
id ← if ids.empty ∨ ids.head = `_ then do
(expr.lam n _ _ _) ← whnf lhs
| pure `_,
return n
else return ids.head,
intro id,
funext_core ids.tail only_ids
meta def funext : tactic unit :=
funext_core [] ff
meta def funext_lst (ids : list name) : tactic unit :=
funext_core ids tt
private meta def get_undeclared_const (env : environment) (base : name) : ℕ → name | i :=
let n := base <.> ("_aux_" ++ repr i) in
if ¬env.contains n then n
else get_undeclared_const (i+1)
meta def new_aux_decl_name : tactic name := do
env ← get_env, n ← decl_name,
return $ get_undeclared_const env n 1
private meta def mk_aux_decl_name : option name → tactic name
| none := new_aux_decl_name
| (some suffix) := do p ← decl_name, return $ p ++ suffix
meta def abstract (tac : tactic unit) (suffix : option name := none) (zeta_reduce := tt) : tactic unit :=
do fail_if_no_goals,
gs ← get_goals,
type ← if zeta_reduce then target >>= zeta else target,
is_lemma ← is_prop type,
m ← mk_meta_var type,
set_goals [m],
tac,
n ← num_goals,
when (n ≠ 0) (fail "abstract tactic failed, there are unsolved goals"),
set_goals gs,
val ← instantiate_mvars m,
val ← if zeta_reduce then zeta val else return val,
c ← mk_aux_decl_name suffix,
e ← add_aux_decl c type val is_lemma,
exact e
/-- `solve_aux type tac` synthesize an element of 'type' using tactic 'tac' -/
meta def solve_aux {α : Type} (type : expr) (tac : tactic α) : tactic (α × expr) :=
do m ← mk_meta_var type,
gs ← get_goals,
set_goals [m],
a ← tac,
set_goals gs,
return (a, m)
/-- Return tt iff 'd' is a declaration in one of the current open namespaces -/
meta def in_open_namespaces (d : name) : tactic bool :=
do ns ← open_namespaces,
env ← get_env,
return $ ns.any (λ n, n.is_prefix_of d) && env.contains d
/-- Execute tac for 'max' "heartbeats". The heartbeat is approx. the maximum number of
memory allocations (in thousands) performed by 'tac'. This is a deterministic way of interrupting
long running tactics. -/
meta def try_for {α} (max : nat) (tac : tactic α) : tactic α :=
λ s,
match _root_.try_for max (tac s) with
| some r := r
| none := mk_exception "try_for tactic failed, timeout" none s
end
meta def updateex_env (f : environment → exceptional environment) : tactic unit :=
do env ← get_env,
env ← returnex $ f env,
set_env env
/- Add a new inductive datatype to the environment
name, universe parameters, number of parameters, type, constructors (name and type), is_meta -/
meta def add_inductive (n : name) (ls : list name) (p : nat) (ty : expr) (is : list (name × expr))
(is_meta : bool := ff) : tactic unit :=
updateex_env $ λe, e.add_inductive n ls p ty is is_meta
meta def add_meta_definition (n : name) (lvls : list name) (type value : expr) : tactic unit :=
add_decl (declaration.defn n lvls type value reducibility_hints.abbrev ff)
/-- add declaration `d` as a protected declaration -/
meta def add_protected_decl (d : declaration) : tactic unit :=
updateex_env $ λ e, e.add_protected d
/-- check if `n` is the name of a protected declaration -/
meta def is_protected_decl (n : name) : tactic bool :=
do env ← get_env,
return $ env.is_protected n
/-- `add_defn_equations` adds a definition specified by a list of equations.
The arguments:
* `lp`: list of universe parameters
* `params`: list of parameters (binders before the colon);
* `fn`: a local constant giving the name and type of the declaration
(with `params` in the local context);
* `eqns`: a list of equations, each of which is a list of patterns
(constructors applied to new local constants) and the branch
expression;
* `is_meta`: is the definition meta?
`add_defn_equations` can be used as:
do my_add ← mk_local_def `my_add `(ℕ → ℕ),
a ← mk_local_def `a ℕ,
b ← mk_local_def `b ℕ,
add_defn_equations [a] my_add
[ ([``(nat.zero)], a),
([``(nat.succ %%b)], my_add b) ])
ff -- non-meta
to create the following definition:
def my_add (a : ℕ) : ℕ → ℕ
| nat.zero := a
| (nat.succ b) := my_add b
-/
meta def add_defn_equations (lp : list name) (params : list expr) (fn : expr)
(eqns : list (list pexpr × expr)) (is_meta : bool) : tactic unit :=
do opt ← get_options,
updateex_env $ λ e, e.add_defn_eqns opt lp params fn eqns is_meta
meta def rename (curr : name) (new : name) : tactic unit :=
do h ← get_local curr,
n ← revert h,
intro new,
intron (n - 1)
/--
"Replace" hypothesis `h : type` with `h : new_type` where `eq_pr` is a proof
that (type = new_type). The tactic actually creates a new hypothesis
with the same user facing name, and (tries to) clear `h`.
The `clear` step fails if `h` has forward dependencies. In this case, the old `h`
will remain in the local context. The tactic returns the new hypothesis. -/
meta def replace_hyp (h : expr) (new_type : expr) (eq_pr : expr) : tactic expr :=
do h_type ← infer_type h,
new_h ← assert h.local_pp_name new_type,
mk_eq_mp eq_pr h >>= exact,
try $ clear h,
return new_h
meta def main_goal : tactic expr :=
do g::gs ← get_goals, return g
/- Goal tagging support -/
meta def with_enable_tags {α : Type} (t : tactic α) (b := tt) : tactic α :=
do old ← tags_enabled,
enable_tags b,
r ← t,
enable_tags old,
return r
meta def get_main_tag : tactic tag :=
main_goal >>= get_tag
meta def set_main_tag (t : tag) : tactic unit :=
do g ← main_goal, set_tag g t
meta def subst (h : expr) : tactic unit :=
(do guard h.is_local_constant,
some (α, lhs, β, rhs) ← expr.is_heq <$> infer_type h,
is_def_eq α β,
new_h_type ← mk_app `eq [lhs, rhs],
new_h_pr ← mk_app `eq_of_heq [h],
new_h ← assertv h.local_pp_name new_h_type new_h_pr,
try (clear h),
subst_core new_h)
<|> subst_core h
end tactic
notation [parsing_only] `command`:max := tactic unit
open tactic
namespace list
meta def for_each {α} : list α → (α → tactic unit) → tactic unit
| [] fn := skip
| (e::es) fn := do fn e, for_each es fn
meta def any_of {α β} : list α → (α → tactic β) → tactic β
| [] fn := failed
| (e::es) fn := do opt_b ← try_core (fn e),
match opt_b with
| some b := return b
| none := any_of es fn
end
end list
/- Install monad laws tactic and use it to prove some instances. -/
/-- Try to prove with `iff.refl`.-/
meta def order_laws_tac := whnf_target >> intros >> to_expr ``(iff.refl _) >>= exact
meta def monad_from_pure_bind {m : Type u → Type v}
(pure : Π {α : Type u}, α → m α)
(bind : Π {α β : Type u}, m α → (α → m β) → m β) : monad m :=
{pure := @pure, bind := @bind}
meta instance : monad task :=
{map := @task.map, bind := @task.bind, pure := @task.pure}
namespace tactic
meta def mk_id_proof (prop : expr) (pr : expr) : expr :=
expr.app (expr.app (expr.const ``id [level.zero]) prop) pr
meta def mk_id_eq (lhs : expr) (rhs : expr) (pr : expr) : tactic expr :=
do prop ← mk_app `eq [lhs, rhs],
return $ mk_id_proof prop pr
meta def replace_target (new_target : expr) (pr : expr) : tactic unit :=
do t ← target,
assert `htarget new_target, swap,
ht ← get_local `htarget,
locked_pr ← mk_id_eq t new_target pr,
mk_eq_mpr locked_pr ht >>= exact
end tactic
|
fad5646d53bd5ac4df6ae47ba546d50c9ff10f46 | 5ae26df177f810c5006841e9c73dc56e01b978d7 | /test/rcases.lean | 65cd7f7782e4ee5e5169945a5f1a3164b4085b02 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ChrisHughes24/mathlib | 98322577c460bc6b1fe5c21f42ce33ad1c3e5558 | a2a867e827c2a6702beb9efc2b9282bd801d5f9a | refs/heads/master | 1,583,848,251,477 | 1,565,164,247,000 | 1,565,164,247,000 | 129,409,993 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,565,164,817,000 | 1,523,628,059,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,867 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon
-/
import tactic.rcases
universe u
variables {α β γ : Type u}
example (x : α × β × γ) : true :=
begin
rcases x with ⟨a, b, c⟩,
{ guard_hyp a := α,
guard_hyp b := β,
guard_hyp c := γ,
trivial }
end
example (x : α × β × γ) : true :=
begin
rcases x with ⟨a, ⟨b, c⟩⟩,
{ guard_hyp a := α,
guard_hyp b := β,
guard_hyp c := γ,
trivial }
end
example (x : (α × β) × γ) : true :=
begin
rcases x with ⟨⟨a, b⟩, c⟩,
{ guard_hyp a := α,
guard_hyp b := β,
guard_hyp c := γ,
trivial }
end
example : inhabited α × option β ⊕ γ → true :=
begin
rintro (⟨⟨a⟩, _ | b⟩ | c),
{ guard_hyp a := α, trivial },
{ guard_hyp a := α, guard_hyp b := β, trivial },
{ guard_hyp c := γ, trivial }
end
example (x y : ℕ) (h : x = y) : true :=
begin
rcases x with _|⟨⟩|z,
{ guard_hyp h := nat.zero = y, trivial },
{ guard_hyp h := nat.succ nat.zero = y, trivial },
{ guard_hyp z := ℕ,
guard_hyp h := z.succ.succ = y, trivial },
end
-- from equiv.sum_empty
example (s : α ⊕ empty) : true :=
begin
rcases s with _ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩,
{ guard_hyp s := α, trivial }
end
example : true :=
begin
obtain ⟨n, h, f⟩ : ∃ n : ℕ, n = n ∧ true,
{ existsi 0, simp },
guard_hyp n := ℕ,
guard_hyp h := n = n,
guard_hyp f := true,
trivial
end
example : true :=
begin
obtain : ∃ n : ℕ, n = n ∧ true,
{ existsi 0, simp },
trivial
end
example : true :=
begin
obtain h | ⟨⟨⟩⟩ : true ∨ false,
{ left, trivial },
guard_hyp h := true,
trivial
end
example : true :=
begin
obtain h | ⟨⟨⟩⟩ : true ∨ false := or.inl trivial,
guard_hyp h := true,
trivial
end
|
bd6901cc1eb9d105f0bd1da28351ed7242a8215a | a9d0fb7b0e4f802bd3857b803e6c5c23d87fef91 | /hott/algebra/category/constructions/functor.hlean | 866e72be7a4f9ef2bdfb1c10416db352092168e4 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean-osx | 4a954262c780e404c1369d6c06516161d07fcb40 | 3670278342d2f4faa49d95b46d86642d7875b47c | refs/heads/master | 1,611,410,334,552 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 12,043,103 | 5 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 16,094 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Jakob von Raumer
Functor precategory and category
-/
import ..nat_trans ..category .opposite
open eq category is_trunc nat_trans iso is_equiv category.hom
namespace functor
definition precategory_functor [instance] [constructor] (D C : Precategory)
: precategory (functor C D) :=
precategory.mk (λa b, nat_trans a b)
(λ a b c g f, nat_trans.compose g f)
(λ a, nat_trans.id)
(λ a b c d h g f, !nat_trans.assoc)
(λ a b f, !nat_trans.id_left)
(λ a b f, !nat_trans.id_right)
definition Precategory_functor [reducible] [constructor] (D C : Precategory) : Precategory :=
precategory.Mk (precategory_functor D C)
infixr ` ^c `:80 := Precategory_functor
section
/- we prove that if a natural transformation is pointwise an iso, then it is an iso -/
variables {C D : Precategory} {F G : C ⇒ D} (η : F ⟹ G) [iso : Π(a : C), is_iso (η a)]
include iso
definition nat_trans_inverse [constructor] : G ⟹ F :=
nat_trans.mk
(λc, (η c)⁻¹)
(λc d f,
abstract begin
apply comp_inverse_eq_of_eq_comp,
transitivity (natural_map η d)⁻¹ ∘ to_fun_hom G f ∘ natural_map η c,
{apply eq_inverse_comp_of_comp_eq, symmetry, apply naturality},
{apply assoc}
end end)
definition nat_trans_left_inverse : nat_trans_inverse η ∘n η = 1 :=
begin
fapply (apd011 nat_trans.mk),
apply eq_of_homotopy, intro c, apply left_inverse,
apply eq_of_homotopy, intros, apply eq_of_homotopy, intros, apply eq_of_homotopy, intros,
apply is_set.elim
end
definition nat_trans_right_inverse : η ∘n nat_trans_inverse η = 1 :=
begin
fapply (apd011 nat_trans.mk),
apply eq_of_homotopy, intro c, apply right_inverse,
apply eq_of_homotopy, intros, apply eq_of_homotopy, intros, apply eq_of_homotopy, intros,
apply is_set.elim
end
definition is_natural_iso [constructor] : is_iso η :=
is_iso.mk _ (nat_trans_left_inverse η) (nat_trans_right_inverse η)
variable (iso)
definition natural_iso.mk [constructor] : F ≅ G :=
iso.mk _ (is_natural_iso η)
omit iso
variables (F G)
definition is_natural_inverse (η : Πc, F c ≅ G c)
(nat : Π⦃a b : C⦄ (f : hom a b), G f ∘ to_hom (η a) = to_hom (η b) ∘ F f)
{a b : C} (f : hom a b) : F f ∘ to_inv (η a) = to_inv (η b) ∘ G f :=
let η' : F ⟹ G := nat_trans.mk (λc, to_hom (η c)) @nat in
naturality (nat_trans_inverse η') f
definition is_natural_inverse' (η₁ : Πc, F c ≅ G c) (η₂ : F ⟹ G) (p : η₁ ~ η₂)
{a b : C} (f : hom a b) : F f ∘ to_inv (η₁ a) = to_inv (η₁ b) ∘ G f :=
is_natural_inverse F G η₁ abstract λa b g, (p a)⁻¹ ▸ (p b)⁻¹ ▸ naturality η₂ g end f
variables {F G}
definition natural_iso.MK [constructor]
(η : Πc, F c ⟶ G c) (p : Π(c c' : C) (f : c ⟶ c'), G f ∘ η c = η c' ∘ F f)
(θ : Πc, G c ⟶ F c) (r : Πc, θ c ∘ η c = id) (q : Πc, η c ∘ θ c = id) : F ≅ G :=
iso.mk (nat_trans.mk η p) (@(is_natural_iso _) (λc, is_iso.mk (θ c) (r c) (q c)))
end
section
/- and conversely, if a natural transformation is an iso, it is componentwise an iso -/
variables {A B C D : Precategory} {F G : C ⇒ D} (η : hom F G) [isoη : is_iso η] (c : C)
include isoη
definition componentwise_is_iso [constructor] : is_iso (η c) :=
@is_iso.mk _ _ _ _ _ (natural_map η⁻¹ c) (ap010 natural_map ( left_inverse η) c)
(ap010 natural_map (right_inverse η) c)
local attribute componentwise_is_iso [instance]
variable {isoη}
definition natural_map_inverse : natural_map η⁻¹ c = (η c)⁻¹ := idp
variable [isoη]
definition naturality_iso {c c' : C} (f : c ⟶ c') : G f = η c' ∘ F f ∘ (η c)⁻¹ :=
calc
G f = (G f ∘ η c) ∘ (η c)⁻¹ : by rewrite comp_inverse_cancel_right
... = (η c' ∘ F f) ∘ (η c)⁻¹ : by rewrite naturality
... = η c' ∘ F f ∘ (η c)⁻¹ : by rewrite assoc
definition naturality_iso' {c c' : C} (f : c ⟶ c') : (η c')⁻¹ ∘ G f ∘ η c = F f :=
calc
(η c')⁻¹ ∘ G f ∘ η c = (η c')⁻¹ ∘ η c' ∘ F f : by rewrite naturality
... = F f : by rewrite inverse_comp_cancel_left
omit isoη
definition componentwise_iso (η : F ≅ G) (c : C) : F c ≅ G c :=
iso.mk (natural_map (to_hom η) c)
(@componentwise_is_iso _ _ _ _ (to_hom η) (struct η) c)
definition componentwise_iso_id (c : C) : componentwise_iso (iso.refl F) c = iso.refl (F c) :=
iso_eq (idpath (ID (F c)))
definition componentwise_iso_iso_of_eq (p : F = G) (c : C)
: componentwise_iso (iso_of_eq p) c = iso_of_eq (ap010 to_fun_ob p c) :=
eq.rec_on p !componentwise_iso_id
theorem naturality_iso_id {F : C ⇒ C} (η : F ≅ 1) (c : C)
: componentwise_iso η (F c) = F (componentwise_iso η c) :=
comp.cancel_left (to_hom (componentwise_iso η c))
((naturality (to_hom η)) (to_hom (componentwise_iso η c)))
definition natural_map_hom_of_eq (p : F = G) (c : C)
: natural_map (hom_of_eq p) c = hom_of_eq (ap010 to_fun_ob p c) :=
eq.rec_on p idp
definition natural_map_inv_of_eq (p : F = G) (c : C)
: natural_map (inv_of_eq p) c = hom_of_eq (ap010 to_fun_ob p c)⁻¹ :=
eq.rec_on p idp
definition hom_of_eq_compose_right {H : B ⇒ C} (p : F = G)
: hom_of_eq (ap (λx, x ∘f H) p) = hom_of_eq p ∘nf H :=
eq.rec_on p idp
definition inv_of_eq_compose_right {H : B ⇒ C} (p : F = G)
: inv_of_eq (ap (λx, x ∘f H) p) = inv_of_eq p ∘nf H :=
eq.rec_on p idp
definition hom_of_eq_compose_left {H : D ⇒ C} (p : F = G)
: hom_of_eq (ap (λx, H ∘f x) p) = H ∘fn hom_of_eq p :=
by induction p; exact !fn_id⁻¹
definition inv_of_eq_compose_left {H : D ⇒ C} (p : F = G)
: inv_of_eq (ap (λx, H ∘f x) p) = H ∘fn inv_of_eq p :=
by induction p; exact !fn_id⁻¹
definition assoc_natural [constructor] (H : C ⇒ D) (G : B ⇒ C) (F : A ⇒ B)
: H ∘f (G ∘f F) ⟹ (H ∘f G) ∘f F :=
change_natural_map (hom_of_eq !functor.assoc)
(λa, id)
(λa, !natural_map_hom_of_eq ⬝ ap hom_of_eq !ap010_assoc)
definition assoc_natural_rev [constructor] (H : C ⇒ D) (G : B ⇒ C) (F : A ⇒ B)
: (H ∘f G) ∘f F ⟹ H ∘f (G ∘f F) :=
change_natural_map (inv_of_eq !functor.assoc)
(λa, id)
(λa, !natural_map_inv_of_eq ⬝ ap (λx, hom_of_eq x⁻¹) !ap010_assoc)
definition id_left_natural [constructor] (F : C ⇒ D) : functor.id ∘f F ⟹ F :=
change_natural_map
(hom_of_eq !functor.id_left)
(λc, id)
(λc, by induction F; exact !natural_map_hom_of_eq ⬝ ap hom_of_eq !ap010_functor_mk_eq_constant)
definition id_left_natural_rev [constructor] (F : C ⇒ D) : F ⟹ functor.id ∘f F :=
change_natural_map
(inv_of_eq !functor.id_left)
(λc, id)
(λc, by induction F; exact !natural_map_inv_of_eq ⬝
ap (λx, hom_of_eq x⁻¹) !ap010_functor_mk_eq_constant)
definition id_right_natural [constructor] (F : C ⇒ D) : F ∘f functor.id ⟹ F :=
change_natural_map
(hom_of_eq !functor.id_right)
(λc, id)
(λc, by induction F; exact !natural_map_hom_of_eq ⬝ ap hom_of_eq !ap010_functor_mk_eq_constant)
definition id_right_natural_rev [constructor] (F : C ⇒ D) : F ⟹ F ∘f functor.id :=
change_natural_map
(inv_of_eq !functor.id_right)
(λc, id)
(λc, by induction F; exact !natural_map_inv_of_eq ⬝
ap (λx, hom_of_eq x⁻¹) !ap010_functor_mk_eq_constant)
end
section
variables {C D E : Precategory} {G G' : D ⇒ E} {F F' : C ⇒ D} {J : D ⇒ D}
definition is_iso_nf_compose [constructor] (G : D ⇒ E) (η : F ⟹ F') [H : is_iso η]
: is_iso (G ∘fn η) :=
is_iso.mk
(G ∘fn @inverse (C ⇒ D) _ _ _ η _)
abstract !fn_n_distrib⁻¹ ⬝ ap (λx, G ∘fn x) (@left_inverse (C ⇒ D) _ _ _ η _) ⬝ !fn_id end
abstract !fn_n_distrib⁻¹ ⬝ ap (λx, G ∘fn x) (@right_inverse (C ⇒ D) _ _ _ η _) ⬝ !fn_id end
definition is_iso_fn_compose [constructor] (η : G ⟹ G') (F : C ⇒ D) [H : is_iso η]
: is_iso (η ∘nf F) :=
is_iso.mk
(@inverse (D ⇒ E) _ _ _ η _ ∘nf F)
abstract !n_nf_distrib⁻¹ ⬝ ap (λx, x ∘nf F) (@left_inverse (D ⇒ E) _ _ _ η _) ⬝ !id_nf end
abstract !n_nf_distrib⁻¹ ⬝ ap (λx, x ∘nf F) (@right_inverse (D ⇒ E) _ _ _ η _) ⬝ !id_nf end
definition functor_iso_compose [constructor] (G : D ⇒ E) (η : F ≅ F') : G ∘f F ≅ G ∘f F' :=
iso.mk _ (is_iso_nf_compose G (to_hom η))
definition iso_functor_compose [constructor] (η : G ≅ G') (F : C ⇒ D) : G ∘f F ≅ G' ∘f F :=
iso.mk _ (is_iso_fn_compose (to_hom η) F)
infixr ` ∘fi ` :62 := functor_iso_compose
infixr ` ∘if ` :62 := iso_functor_compose
/- TODO: also needs n_nf_distrib and id_nf for these compositions
definition nidf_compose [constructor] (η : J ⟹ 1) (F : C ⇒ D) [H : is_iso η]
: is_iso (η ∘n1f F) :=
is_iso.mk
(@inverse (D ⇒ D) _ _ _ η _ ∘1nf F)
abstract _ end
_
definition idnf_compose [constructor] (η : 1 ⟹ J) (F : C ⇒ D) [H : is_iso η]
: is_iso (η ∘1nf F) :=
is_iso.mk _
_
_
definition fnid_compose [constructor] (F : D ⇒ E) (η : J ⟹ 1) [H : is_iso η]
: is_iso (F ∘fn1 η) :=
is_iso.mk _
_
_
definition fidn_compose [constructor] (F : D ⇒ E) (η : 1 ⟹ J) [H : is_iso η]
: is_iso (F ∘f1n η) :=
is_iso.mk _
_
_
-/
end
namespace functor
variables {C : Precategory} {D : Category} {F G : D ^c C}
definition eq_of_iso_ob (η : F ≅ G) (c : C) : F c = G c :=
by apply eq_of_iso; apply componentwise_iso; exact η
local attribute functor.to_fun_hom [reducible]
definition eq_of_iso (η : F ≅ G) : F = G :=
begin
fapply functor_eq,
{exact (eq_of_iso_ob η)},
{intro c c' f,
esimp [eq_of_iso_ob, inv_of_eq, hom_of_eq, eq_of_iso],
rewrite [*right_inv iso_of_eq],
symmetry, apply @naturality_iso _ _ _ _ _ (iso.struct _)
}
end
definition iso_of_eq_eq_of_iso (η : F ≅ G) : iso_of_eq (eq_of_iso η) = η :=
begin
apply iso_eq,
apply nat_trans_eq,
intro c,
rewrite natural_map_hom_of_eq, esimp [eq_of_iso],
rewrite ap010_functor_eq, esimp [hom_of_eq,eq_of_iso_ob],
rewrite (right_inv iso_of_eq),
end
definition eq_of_iso_iso_of_eq (p : F = G) : eq_of_iso (iso_of_eq p) = p :=
begin
apply functor_eq2,
intro c,
esimp [eq_of_iso],
rewrite ap010_functor_eq,
esimp [eq_of_iso_ob],
rewrite componentwise_iso_iso_of_eq,
rewrite (left_inv iso_of_eq)
end
definition is_univalent (D : Category) (C : Precategory) : is_univalent (D ^c C) :=
λF G, adjointify _ eq_of_iso
iso_of_eq_eq_of_iso
eq_of_iso_iso_of_eq
end functor
definition category_functor [instance] [constructor] (D : Category) (C : Precategory)
: category (D ^c C) :=
category.mk (D ^c C) (functor.is_univalent D C)
definition Category_functor [constructor] (D : Category) (C : Precategory) : Category :=
category.Mk (D ^c C) !category_functor
--this definition is only useful if the exponent is a category,
-- and the elaborator has trouble with inserting the coercion
definition Category_functor' [constructor] (D C : Category) : Category :=
Category_functor D C
namespace ops
infixr ` ^c2 `:35 := Category_functor
end ops
namespace functor
variables {C : Precategory} {D : Category} {F G : D ^c C}
definition eq_of_pointwise_iso (η : F ⟹ G) (iso : Π(a : C), is_iso (η a)) : F = G :=
eq_of_iso (natural_iso.mk η iso)
definition iso_of_eq_eq_of_pointwise_iso (η : F ⟹ G) (iso : Π(c : C), is_iso (η c))
: iso_of_eq (eq_of_pointwise_iso η iso) = natural_iso.mk η iso :=
!iso_of_eq_eq_of_iso
definition hom_of_eq_eq_of_pointwise_iso (η : F ⟹ G) (iso : Π(c : C), is_iso (η c))
: hom_of_eq (eq_of_pointwise_iso η iso) = η :=
!hom_of_eq_eq_of_iso
definition inv_of_eq_eq_of_pointwise_iso (η : F ⟹ G) (iso : Π(c : C), is_iso (η c))
: inv_of_eq (eq_of_pointwise_iso η iso) = nat_trans_inverse η :=
!inv_of_eq_eq_of_iso
end functor
/-
functors involving only the functor category
(see ..functor.curry for some other functors involving also products)
-/
variables {C D I : Precategory}
definition constant2_functor [constructor] (F : I ⇒ D ^c C) (c : C) : I ⇒ D :=
functor.mk (λi, to_fun_ob (F i) c)
(λi j f, natural_map (F f) c)
abstract (λi, ap010 natural_map !respect_id c ⬝ proof idp qed) end
abstract (λi j k g f, ap010 natural_map !respect_comp c) end
definition constant2_functor_natural [constructor] (F : I ⇒ D ^c C) {c d : C} (f : c ⟶ d)
: constant2_functor F c ⟹ constant2_functor F d :=
nat_trans.mk (λi, to_fun_hom (F i) f)
(λi j k, (naturality (F k) f)⁻¹)
definition functor_flip [constructor] (F : I ⇒ D ^c C) : C ⇒ D ^c I :=
functor.mk (constant2_functor F)
@(constant2_functor_natural F)
abstract begin intros, apply nat_trans_eq, intro i, esimp, apply respect_id end end
abstract begin intros, apply nat_trans_eq, intro i, esimp, apply respect_comp end end
definition eval_functor [constructor] (C D : Precategory) (d : D) : C ^c D ⇒ C :=
begin
fapply functor.mk: esimp,
{ intro F, exact F d},
{ intro G F η, exact η d},
{ intro F, reflexivity},
{ intro H G F η θ, reflexivity},
end
definition precomposition_functor [constructor] {C D} (E) (F : C ⇒ D)
: E ^c D ⇒ E ^c C :=
begin
fapply functor.mk: esimp,
{ intro G, exact G ∘f F},
{ intro G H η, exact η ∘nf F},
{ intro G, reflexivity},
{ intro G H I η θ, reflexivity},
end
definition postcomposition_functor [constructor] {C D} (E) (F : C ⇒ D)
: C ^c E ⇒ D ^c E :=
begin
fapply functor.mk: esimp,
{ intro G, exact F ∘f G},
{ intro G H η, exact F ∘fn η},
{ intro G, apply fn_id},
{ intro G H I η θ, apply fn_n_distrib},
end
definition constant_diagram [constructor] (C D) : C ⇒ C ^c D :=
begin
fapply functor.mk: esimp,
{ intro c, exact constant_functor D c},
{ intro c d f, exact constant_nat_trans D f},
{ intro c, fapply nat_trans_eq, reflexivity},
{ intro c d e g f, fapply nat_trans_eq, reflexivity},
end
definition opposite_functor_opposite_left [constructor] (C D : Precategory)
: (C ^c D)ᵒᵖ ⇒ Cᵒᵖ ^c Dᵒᵖ :=
begin
fapply functor.mk: esimp,
{ exact opposite_functor},
{ intro F G, exact opposite_nat_trans},
{ intro F, apply nat_trans_eq, reflexivity},
{ intro u v w g f, apply nat_trans_eq, reflexivity}
end
definition opposite_functor_opposite_right [constructor] (C D : Precategory)
: Cᵒᵖ ^c Dᵒᵖ ⇒ (C ^c D)ᵒᵖ :=
begin
fapply functor.mk: esimp,
{ exact opposite_functor_rev},
{ apply @opposite_rev_nat_trans},
{ intro F, apply nat_trans_eq, intro d, reflexivity},
{ intro F G H η θ, apply nat_trans_eq, intro d, reflexivity}
end
definition constant_diagram_opposite [constructor] (C D)
: (constant_diagram C D)ᵒᵖᶠ = opposite_functor_opposite_right C D ∘f constant_diagram Cᵒᵖ Dᵒᵖ :=
begin
fapply functor_eq,
{ reflexivity},
{ intro c c' f, esimp at *, refine !nat_trans.id_right ⬝ !nat_trans.id_left ⬝ _,
apply nat_trans_eq, intro d, reflexivity}
end
end functor
|
951d4841d6c925e0e2e571a562ba54bb9eefd9e7 | 6094e25ea0b7699e642463b48e51b2ead6ddc23f | /library/data/finset/comb.lean | 14f22cbabb9da34eef6276f6c0c57685410a2823 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | gbaz/lean | a7835c4e3006fbbb079e8f8ffe18aacc45adebfb | a501c308be3acaa50a2c0610ce2e0d71becf8032 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,198,791,433 | 1,451,339,111,000 | 1,451,339,111,000 | 48,713,797 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,451,338,939,000 | 1,451,338,939,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 18,908 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad
Combinators for finite sets.
-/
import data.finset.basic logic.identities
open list quot subtype decidable perm function
namespace finset
/- image (corresponds to map on list) -/
section image
variables {A B : Type}
variable [h : decidable_eq B]
include h
definition image (f : A → B) (s : finset A) : finset B :=
quot.lift_on s
(λ l, to_finset (list.map f (elt_of l)))
(λ l₁ l₂ p, quot.sound (perm_erase_dup_of_perm (perm_map _ p)))
notation [priority finset.prio] f `'[`:max a `]` := image f a
theorem image_empty (f : A → B) : image f ∅ = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem mem_image_of_mem (f : A → B) {s : finset A} {a : A} : a ∈ s → f a ∈ image f s :=
quot.induction_on s (take l, assume H : a ∈ elt_of l, mem_to_finset (mem_map f H))
theorem mem_image {f : A → B} {s : finset A} {a : A} {b : B}
(H1 : a ∈ s) (H2 : f a = b) :
b ∈ image f s :=
eq.subst H2 (mem_image_of_mem f H1)
theorem exists_of_mem_image {f : A → B} {s : finset A} {b : B} :
b ∈ image f s → ∃a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b :=
quot.induction_on s
(take l, assume H : b ∈ erase_dup (list.map f (elt_of l)),
exists_of_mem_map (mem_of_mem_erase_dup H))
theorem mem_image_iff (f : A → B) {s : finset A} {y : B} : y ∈ image f s ↔ ∃x, x ∈ s ∧ f x = y :=
iff.intro exists_of_mem_image
(assume H,
obtain x (H₁ : x ∈ s) (H₂ : f x = y), from H,
mem_image H₁ H₂)
theorem mem_image_eq (f : A → B) {s : finset A} {y : B} : y ∈ image f s = ∃x, x ∈ s ∧ f x = y :=
propext (mem_image_iff f)
theorem mem_image_of_mem_image_of_subset {f : A → B} {s t : finset A} {y : B}
(H1 : y ∈ image f s) (H2 : s ⊆ t) : y ∈ image f t :=
obtain x (H3: x ∈ s) (H4 : f x = y), from exists_of_mem_image H1,
have H5 : x ∈ t, from mem_of_subset_of_mem H2 H3,
show y ∈ image f t, from mem_image H5 H4
theorem image_insert [h' : decidable_eq A] (f : A → B) (s : finset A) (a : A) :
image f (insert a s) = insert (f a) (image f s) :=
ext (take y, iff.intro
(assume H : y ∈ image f (insert a s),
obtain x (H1l : x ∈ insert a s) (H1r :f x = y), from exists_of_mem_image H,
have x = a ∨ x ∈ s, from eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert H1l,
or.elim this
(suppose x = a,
have f a = y, from eq.subst this H1r,
show y ∈ insert (f a) (image f s), from eq.subst this !mem_insert)
(suppose x ∈ s,
have f x ∈ image f s, from mem_image_of_mem f this,
show y ∈ insert (f a) (image f s), from eq.subst H1r (mem_insert_of_mem _ this)))
(suppose y ∈ insert (f a) (image f s),
have y = f a ∨ y ∈ image f s, from eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert this,
or.elim this
(suppose y = f a,
have f a ∈ image f (insert a s), from mem_image_of_mem f !mem_insert,
show y ∈ image f (insert a s), from eq.subst (eq.symm `y = f a`) this)
(suppose y ∈ image f s,
show y ∈ image f (insert a s), from mem_image_of_mem_image_of_subset this !subset_insert)))
lemma image_compose {C : Type} [deceqC : decidable_eq C] {f : B → C} {g : A → B} {s : finset A} :
image (f∘g) s = image f (image g s) :=
ext (take z, iff.intro
(suppose z ∈ image (f∘g) s,
obtain x (Hx : x ∈ s) (Hgfx : f (g x) = z), from exists_of_mem_image this,
by rewrite -Hgfx; apply mem_image_of_mem _ (mem_image_of_mem _ Hx))
(suppose z ∈ image f (image g s),
obtain y (Hy : y ∈ image g s) (Hfy : f y = z), from exists_of_mem_image this,
obtain x (Hx : x ∈ s) (Hgx : g x = y), from exists_of_mem_image Hy,
mem_image Hx (by esimp; rewrite [Hgx, Hfy])))
lemma image_subset {a b : finset A} (f : A → B) (H : a ⊆ b) : f '[a] ⊆ f '[b] :=
subset_of_forall
(take y, assume Hy : y ∈ f '[a],
obtain x (Hx₁ : x ∈ a) (Hx₂ : f x = y), from exists_of_mem_image Hy,
mem_image (mem_of_subset_of_mem H Hx₁) Hx₂)
theorem image_union [h' : decidable_eq A] (f : A → B) (s t : finset A) :
image f (s ∪ t) = image f s ∪ image f t :=
ext (take y, iff.intro
(assume H : y ∈ image f (s ∪ t),
obtain x [(xst : x ∈ s ∪ t) (fxy : f x = y)], from exists_of_mem_image H,
or.elim (mem_or_mem_of_mem_union xst)
(assume xs, mem_union_l (mem_image xs fxy))
(assume xt, mem_union_r (mem_image xt fxy)))
(assume H : y ∈ image f s ∪ image f t,
or.elim (mem_or_mem_of_mem_union H)
(assume yifs : y ∈ image f s,
obtain x [(xs : x ∈ s) (fxy : f x = y)], from exists_of_mem_image yifs,
mem_image (mem_union_l xs) fxy)
(assume yift : y ∈ image f t,
obtain x [(xt : x ∈ t) (fxy : f x = y)], from exists_of_mem_image yift,
mem_image (mem_union_r xt) fxy)))
end image
/- separation and set-builder notation -/
section sep
variables {A : Type} [deceq : decidable_eq A]
include deceq
variables (p : A → Prop) [decp : decidable_pred p] (s : finset A) {x : A}
include decp
definition sep : finset A :=
quot.lift_on s
(λl, to_finset_of_nodup
(list.filter p (subtype.elt_of l))
(list.nodup_filter p (subtype.has_property l)))
(λ l₁ l₂ u, quot.sound (perm.perm_filter u))
notation [priority finset.prio] `{` binder ` ∈ ` s ` | ` r:(scoped:1 p, sep p s) `}` := r
theorem sep_empty : sep p ∅ = ∅ := rfl
variables {p s}
theorem of_mem_sep : x ∈ sep p s → p x :=
quot.induction_on s (take l, list.of_mem_filter)
theorem mem_of_mem_sep : x ∈ sep p s → x ∈ s :=
quot.induction_on s (take l, list.mem_of_mem_filter)
theorem mem_sep_of_mem {x : A} : x ∈ s → p x → x ∈ sep p s :=
quot.induction_on s (take l, list.mem_filter_of_mem)
variables (p s)
theorem mem_sep_iff : x ∈ sep p s ↔ x ∈ s ∧ p x :=
iff.intro
(assume H, and.intro (mem_of_mem_sep H) (of_mem_sep H))
(assume H, mem_sep_of_mem (and.left H) (and.right H))
theorem mem_sep_eq : x ∈ sep p s = (x ∈ s ∧ p x) :=
propext !mem_sep_iff
variable t : finset A
theorem mem_sep_union_iff : x ∈ sep p (s ∪ t) ↔ x ∈ sep p s ∨ x ∈ sep p t :=
by rewrite [*mem_sep_iff, mem_union_iff, and.right_distrib]
end sep
section
variables {A : Type} [deceqA : decidable_eq A]
include deceqA
theorem eq_sep_of_subset {s t : finset A} (ssubt : s ⊆ t) : s = {x ∈ t | x ∈ s} :=
ext (take x, iff.intro
(suppose x ∈ s, mem_sep_of_mem (mem_of_subset_of_mem ssubt this) this)
(suppose x ∈ {x ∈ t | x ∈ s}, of_mem_sep this))
theorem mem_singleton_eq' (x a : A) : x ∈ '{a} = (x = a) :=
by rewrite [mem_insert_eq, mem_empty_eq, or_false]
end
/- set difference -/
section diff
variables {A : Type} [deceq : decidable_eq A]
include deceq
definition diff (s t : finset A) : finset A := {x ∈ s | x ∉ t}
infix [priority finset.prio] ` \ `:70 := diff
theorem mem_of_mem_diff {s t : finset A} {x : A} (H : x ∈ s \ t) : x ∈ s :=
mem_of_mem_sep H
theorem not_mem_of_mem_diff {s t : finset A} {x : A} (H : x ∈ s \ t) : x ∉ t :=
of_mem_sep H
theorem mem_diff {s t : finset A} {x : A} (H1 : x ∈ s) (H2 : x ∉ t) : x ∈ s \ t :=
mem_sep_of_mem H1 H2
theorem mem_diff_iff (s t : finset A) (x : A) : x ∈ s \ t ↔ x ∈ s ∧ x ∉ t :=
iff.intro
(assume H, and.intro (mem_of_mem_diff H) (not_mem_of_mem_diff H))
(assume H, mem_diff (and.left H) (and.right H))
theorem mem_diff_eq (s t : finset A) (x : A) : x ∈ s \ t = (x ∈ s ∧ x ∉ t) :=
propext !mem_diff_iff
theorem union_diff_cancel {s t : finset A} (H : s ⊆ t) : s ∪ (t \ s) = t :=
ext (take x, iff.intro
(suppose x ∈ s ∪ (t \ s),
or.elim (mem_or_mem_of_mem_union this)
(suppose x ∈ s, mem_of_subset_of_mem H this)
(suppose x ∈ t \ s, mem_of_mem_diff this))
(suppose x ∈ t,
decidable.by_cases
(suppose x ∈ s, mem_union_left _ this)
(suppose x ∉ s, mem_union_right _ (mem_diff `x ∈ t` this))))
theorem diff_union_cancel {s t : finset A} (H : s ⊆ t) : (t \ s) ∪ s = t :=
eq.subst !union.comm (!union_diff_cancel H)
end diff
/- set complement -/
section complement
variables {A : Type} [deceqA : decidable_eq A] [h : fintype A]
include deceqA h
definition complement (s : finset A) : finset A := univ \ s
prefix [priority finset.prio] - := complement
theorem mem_complement {s : finset A} {x : A} (H : x ∉ s) : x ∈ -s :=
mem_diff !mem_univ H
theorem not_mem_of_mem_complement {s : finset A} {x : A} (H : x ∈ -s) : x ∉ s :=
not_mem_of_mem_diff H
theorem mem_complement_iff (s : finset A) (x : A) : x ∈ -s ↔ x ∉ s :=
iff.intro not_mem_of_mem_complement mem_complement
section
open classical
theorem union_eq_comp_comp_inter_comp (s t : finset A) : s ∪ t = -(-s ∩ -t) :=
ext (take x, by rewrite [mem_union_iff, mem_complement_iff, mem_inter_iff, *mem_complement_iff,
or_iff_not_and_not])
theorem inter_eq_comp_comp_union_comp (s t : finset A) : s ∩ t = -(-s ∪ -t) :=
ext (take x, by rewrite [mem_inter_iff, mem_complement_iff, mem_union_iff, *mem_complement_iff,
and_iff_not_or_not])
end
end complement
/- all -/
section all
variables {A : Type}
definition all (s : finset A) (p : A → Prop) : Prop :=
quot.lift_on s
(λ l, all (elt_of l) p)
(λ l₁ l₂ p, foldr_eq_of_perm (λ a₁ a₂ q, propext !and.left_comm) p true)
theorem all_empty (p : A → Prop) : all ∅ p = true :=
rfl
theorem of_mem_of_all {p : A → Prop} {a : A} {s : finset A} : a ∈ s → all s p → p a :=
quot.induction_on s (λ l i h, list.of_mem_of_all i h)
theorem forall_of_all {p : A → Prop} {s : finset A} (H : all s p) : ∀{a}, a ∈ s → p a :=
λ a H', of_mem_of_all H' H
theorem all_of_forall {p : A → Prop} {s : finset A} : (∀a, a ∈ s → p a) → all s p :=
quot.induction_on s (λ l H, list.all_of_forall H)
theorem all_iff_forall (p : A → Prop) (s : finset A) : all s p ↔ (∀a, a ∈ s → p a) :=
iff.intro forall_of_all all_of_forall
definition decidable_all [instance] (p : A → Prop) [h : decidable_pred p] (s : finset A) :
decidable (all s p) :=
quot.rec_on_subsingleton s (λ l, list.decidable_all p (elt_of l))
theorem all_implies {p q : A → Prop} {s : finset A} : all s p → (∀ x, p x → q x) → all s q :=
quot.induction_on s (λ l h₁ h₂, list.all_implies h₁ h₂)
variable [h : decidable_eq A]
include h
theorem all_union {p : A → Prop} {s₁ s₂ : finset A} : all s₁ p → all s₂ p → all (s₁ ∪ s₂) p :=
quot.induction_on₂ s₁ s₂ (λ l₁ l₂ a₁ a₂, all_union a₁ a₂)
theorem all_of_all_union_left {p : A → Prop} {s₁ s₂ : finset A} : all (s₁ ∪ s₂) p → all s₁ p :=
quot.induction_on₂ s₁ s₂ (λ l₁ l₂ a, list.all_of_all_union_left a)
theorem all_of_all_union_right {p : A → Prop} {s₁ s₂ : finset A} : all (s₁ ∪ s₂) p → all s₂ p :=
quot.induction_on₂ s₁ s₂ (λ l₁ l₂ a, list.all_of_all_union_right a)
theorem all_insert_of_all {p : A → Prop} {a : A} {s : finset A} : p a → all s p → all (insert a s) p :=
quot.induction_on s (λ l h₁ h₂, list.all_insert_of_all h₁ h₂)
theorem all_erase_of_all {p : A → Prop} (a : A) {s : finset A}: all s p → all (erase a s) p :=
quot.induction_on s (λ l h, list.all_erase_of_all a h)
theorem all_inter_of_all_left {p : A → Prop} {s₁ : finset A} (s₂ : finset A) : all s₁ p → all (s₁ ∩ s₂) p :=
quot.induction_on₂ s₁ s₂ (λ l₁ l₂ h, list.all_inter_of_all_left _ h)
theorem all_inter_of_all_right {p : A → Prop} {s₁ : finset A} (s₂ : finset A) : all s₂ p → all (s₁ ∩ s₂) p :=
quot.induction_on₂ s₁ s₂ (λ l₁ l₂ h, list.all_inter_of_all_right _ h)
theorem subset_iff_all (s t : finset A) : s ⊆ t ↔ all s (λ x, x ∈ t) :=
iff.intro
(suppose s ⊆ t, all_of_forall (take x, suppose x ∈ s, mem_of_subset_of_mem `s ⊆ t` `x ∈ s`))
(suppose all s (λ x, x ∈ t), subset_of_forall (take x, suppose x ∈ s, of_mem_of_all `x ∈ s` `all s (λ x, x ∈ t)`))
definition decidable_subset [instance] (s t : finset A) : decidable (s ⊆ t) :=
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff _ (iff.symm !subset_iff_all)
end all
/- any -/
section any
variables {A : Type}
definition any (s : finset A) (p : A → Prop) : Prop :=
quot.lift_on s
(λ l, any (elt_of l) p)
(λ l₁ l₂ p, foldr_eq_of_perm (λ a₁ a₂ q, propext !or.left_comm) p false)
theorem any_empty (p : A → Prop) : any ∅ p = false := rfl
theorem exists_of_any {p : A → Prop} {s : finset A} : any s p → ∃a, a ∈ s ∧ p a :=
quot.induction_on s (λ l H, list.exists_of_any H)
theorem any_of_mem {p : A → Prop} {s : finset A} {a : A} : a ∈ s → p a → any s p :=
quot.induction_on s (λ l H1 H2, list.any_of_mem H1 H2)
theorem any_of_exists {p : A → Prop} {s : finset A} (H : ∃a, a ∈ s ∧ p a) : any s p :=
obtain a H₁ H₂, from H,
any_of_mem H₁ H₂
theorem any_iff_exists (p : A → Prop) (s : finset A) : any s p ↔ (∃a, a ∈ s ∧ p a) :=
iff.intro exists_of_any any_of_exists
theorem any_of_insert [h : decidable_eq A] {p : A → Prop} (s : finset A) {a : A} (H : p a) :
any (insert a s) p :=
any_of_mem (mem_insert a s) H
theorem any_of_insert_right [h : decidable_eq A] {p : A → Prop} {s : finset A} (a : A) (H : any s p) :
any (insert a s) p :=
obtain b (H₁ : b ∈ s) (H₂ : p b), from exists_of_any H,
any_of_mem (mem_insert_of_mem a H₁) H₂
definition decidable_any [instance] (p : A → Prop) [h : decidable_pred p] (s : finset A) :
decidable (any s p) :=
quot.rec_on_subsingleton s (λ l, list.decidable_any p (elt_of l))
end any
section product
variables {A B : Type}
definition product (s₁ : finset A) (s₂ : finset B) : finset (A × B) :=
quot.lift_on₂ s₁ s₂
(λ l₁ l₂,
to_finset_of_nodup (product (elt_of l₁) (elt_of l₂))
(nodup_product (has_property l₁) (has_property l₂)))
(λ v₁ v₂ w₁ w₂ p₁ p₂, begin apply @quot.sound, apply perm_product p₁ p₂ end)
infix [priority finset.prio] * := product
theorem empty_product (s : finset B) : @empty A * s = ∅ :=
quot.induction_on s (λ l, rfl)
theorem mem_product {a : A} {b : B} {s₁ : finset A} {s₂ : finset B}
: a ∈ s₁ → b ∈ s₂ → (a, b) ∈ s₁ * s₂ :=
quot.induction_on₂ s₁ s₂ (λ l₁ l₂ i₁ i₂, list.mem_product i₁ i₂)
theorem mem_of_mem_product_left {a : A} {b : B} {s₁ : finset A} {s₂ : finset B}
: (a, b) ∈ s₁ * s₂ → a ∈ s₁ :=
quot.induction_on₂ s₁ s₂ (λ l₁ l₂ i, list.mem_of_mem_product_left i)
theorem mem_of_mem_product_right {a : A} {b : B} {s₁ : finset A} {s₂ : finset B}
: (a, b) ∈ s₁ * s₂ → b ∈ s₂ :=
quot.induction_on₂ s₁ s₂ (λ l₁ l₂ i, list.mem_of_mem_product_right i)
theorem product_empty (s : finset A) : s * @empty B = ∅ :=
ext (λ p,
match p with
| (a, b) := iff.intro
(λ i, absurd (mem_of_mem_product_right i) !not_mem_empty)
(λ i, absurd i !not_mem_empty)
end)
end product
/- powerset -/
section powerset
variables {A : Type} [deceqA : decidable_eq A]
include deceqA
section list_powerset
open list
definition list_powerset : list A → finset (finset A)
| [] := '{∅}
| (a :: l) := list_powerset l ∪ image (insert a) (list_powerset l)
end list_powerset
private theorem image_insert_comm (a b : A) (s : finset (finset A)) :
image (insert a) (image (insert b) s) = image (insert b) (image (insert a) s) :=
have aux' : ∀ a b : A, ∀ x : finset A,
x ∈ image (insert a) (image (insert b) s) →
x ∈ image (insert b) (image (insert a) s), from
begin
intros [a, b, x, H],
cases (exists_of_mem_image H) with [y, Hy],
cases Hy with [Hy1, Hy2],
cases (exists_of_mem_image Hy1) with [z, Hz],
cases Hz with [Hz1, Hz2],
substvars,
rewrite insert.comm,
repeat (apply mem_image_of_mem),
assumption
end,
ext (take x, iff.intro (aux' a b x) (aux' b a x))
theorem list_powerset_eq_list_powerset_of_perm {l₁ l₂ : list A} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) :
list_powerset l₁ = list_powerset l₂ :=
perm.induction_on p
rfl
(λ x l₁ l₂ p ih, by rewrite [↑list_powerset, ih])
(λ x y l, by rewrite [↑list_powerset, ↑list_powerset, *image_union, image_insert_comm,
*union.assoc, union.left_comm (finset.image (finset.insert x) _)])
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂, eq.trans r₁ r₂)
definition powerset (s : finset A) : finset (finset A) :=
quot.lift_on s
(λ l, list_powerset (elt_of l))
(λ l₁ l₂ p, list_powerset_eq_list_powerset_of_perm p)
prefix [priority finset.prio] `𝒫`:100 := powerset
theorem powerset_empty : 𝒫 (∅ : finset A) = '{∅} := rfl
theorem powerset_insert {a : A} {s : finset A} : a ∉ s → 𝒫 (insert a s) = 𝒫 s ∪ image (insert a) (𝒫 s) :=
quot.induction_on s
(λ l,
assume H : a ∉ quot.mk l,
calc
𝒫 (insert a (quot.mk l))
= list_powerset (list.insert a (elt_of l)) : rfl
... = list_powerset (#list a :: elt_of l) : by rewrite [list.insert_eq_of_not_mem H]
... = 𝒫 (quot.mk l) ∪ image (insert a) (𝒫 (quot.mk l)) : rfl)
theorem mem_powerset_iff_subset (s : finset A) : ∀ x, x ∈ 𝒫 s ↔ x ⊆ s :=
begin
induction s with a s nains ih,
intro x,
rewrite powerset_empty,
show x ∈ '{∅} ↔ x ⊆ ∅, by rewrite [mem_singleton_eq', subset_empty_iff],
intro x,
rewrite [powerset_insert nains, mem_union_iff, ih, mem_image_iff],
exact
(iff.intro
(assume H,
or.elim H
(suppose x ⊆ s, subset.trans this !subset_insert)
(suppose ∃ y, y ∈ 𝒫 s ∧ insert a y = x,
obtain y [yps iay], from this,
show x ⊆ insert a s,
begin
rewrite [-iay],
apply insert_subset_insert,
rewrite -ih,
apply yps
end))
(assume H : x ⊆ insert a s,
assert H' : erase a x ⊆ s, from erase_subset_of_subset_insert H,
decidable.by_cases
(suppose a ∈ x,
or.inr (exists.intro (erase a x)
(and.intro
(show erase a x ∈ 𝒫 s, by rewrite ih; apply H')
(show insert a (erase a x) = x, from insert_erase this))))
(suppose a ∉ x, or.inl
(show x ⊆ s, by rewrite [(erase_eq_of_not_mem this) at H']; apply H'))))
end
theorem subset_of_mem_powerset {s t : finset A} (H : s ∈ 𝒫 t) : s ⊆ t :=
iff.mp (mem_powerset_iff_subset t s) H
theorem mem_powerset_of_subset {s t : finset A} (H : s ⊆ t) : s ∈ 𝒫 t :=
iff.mpr (mem_powerset_iff_subset t s) H
theorem empty_mem_powerset (s : finset A) : ∅ ∈ 𝒫 s :=
mem_powerset_of_subset (empty_subset s)
end powerset
end finset
|
1f65df8f2ce1bde54cf5c8e457c06287f8971031 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/linear_algebra/matrix/charpoly/finite_field.lean | 429b18e1a6f644b74e198ae6deb4083a5fc1de74 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,347 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark
-/
import linear_algebra.matrix.charpoly.coeff
import field_theory.finite.basic
import data.matrix.char_p
/-!
# Results on characteristic polynomials and traces over finite fields.
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
-/
noncomputable theory
open polynomial matrix
open_locale polynomial
variables {n : Type*} [decidable_eq n] [fintype n]
@[simp] lemma finite_field.matrix.charpoly_pow_card {K : Type*} [field K] [fintype K]
(M : matrix n n K) : (M ^ (fintype.card K)).charpoly = M.charpoly :=
begin
casesI (is_empty_or_nonempty n).symm,
{ cases char_p.exists K with p hp, letI := hp,
rcases finite_field.card K p with ⟨⟨k, kpos⟩, ⟨hp, hk⟩⟩,
haveI : fact p.prime := ⟨hp⟩,
dsimp at hk, rw hk at *,
apply (frobenius_inj K[X] p).iterate k,
repeat { rw iterate_frobenius, rw ← hk },
rw ← finite_field.expand_card,
unfold charpoly, rw [alg_hom.map_det, ← coe_det_monoid_hom,
← (det_monoid_hom : matrix n n K[X] →* K[X]).map_pow],
apply congr_arg det,
refine mat_poly_equiv.injective _,
rw [alg_equiv.map_pow, mat_poly_equiv_charmatrix, hk, sub_pow_char_pow_of_commute, ← C_pow],
{ exact (id (mat_poly_equiv_eq_X_pow_sub_C (p ^ k) M) : _) },
{ exact (C M).commute_X } },
{ exact congr_arg _ (subsingleton.elim _ _), },
end
@[simp] lemma zmod.charpoly_pow_card {p : ℕ} [fact p.prime] (M : matrix n n (zmod p)) :
(M ^ p).charpoly = M.charpoly :=
by { have h := finite_field.matrix.charpoly_pow_card M, rwa zmod.card at h, }
lemma finite_field.trace_pow_card {K : Type*} [field K] [fintype K]
(M : matrix n n K) : trace (M ^ (fintype.card K)) = trace M ^ (fintype.card K) :=
begin
casesI is_empty_or_nonempty n,
{ simp [zero_pow fintype.card_pos, matrix.trace], },
rw [matrix.trace_eq_neg_charpoly_coeff, matrix.trace_eq_neg_charpoly_coeff,
finite_field.matrix.charpoly_pow_card, finite_field.pow_card]
end
lemma zmod.trace_pow_card {p : ℕ} [fact p.prime] (M : matrix n n (zmod p)) :
trace (M ^ p) = (trace M)^p :=
by { have h := finite_field.trace_pow_card M, rwa zmod.card at h, }
|
80ad05fbfd64bd90f73fea46f04a338b7ecdda42 | 2a70b774d16dbdf5a533432ee0ebab6838df0948 | /_target/deps/mathlib/src/category_theory/products/basic.lean | ebc352011d5c8d01009ec2c571860edf4f38a24b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | hjvromen/lewis | 40b035973df7c77ebf927afab7878c76d05ff758 | 105b675f73630f028ad5d890897a51b3c1146fb0 | refs/heads/master | 1,677,944,636,343 | 1,676,555,301,000 | 1,676,555,301,000 | 327,553,599 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,750 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Stephen Morgan, Scott Morrison
-/
import category_theory.eq_to_hom
namespace category_theory
universes v₁ v₂ v₃ v₄ u₁ u₂ u₃ u₄ -- declare the `v`'s first; see `category_theory.category` for an explanation
section
variables (C : Type u₁) [category.{v₁} C] (D : Type u₂) [category.{v₂} D]
/--
`prod C D` gives the cartesian product of two categories.
See https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/001K.
-/
instance prod : category.{max v₁ v₂} (C × D) :=
{ hom := λ X Y, ((X.1) ⟶ (Y.1)) × ((X.2) ⟶ (Y.2)),
id := λ X, ⟨ 𝟙 (X.1), 𝟙 (X.2) ⟩,
comp := λ _ _ _ f g, (f.1 ≫ g.1, f.2 ≫ g.2) }
-- rfl lemmas for category.prod
@[simp] lemma prod_id (X : C) (Y : D) : 𝟙 (X, Y) = (𝟙 X, 𝟙 Y) := rfl
@[simp] lemma prod_comp {P Q R : C} {S T U : D} (f : (P, S) ⟶ (Q, T)) (g : (Q, T) ⟶ (R, U)) :
f ≫ g = (f.1 ≫ g.1, f.2 ≫ g.2) := rfl
@[simp] lemma prod_id_fst (X : prod C D) : prod.fst (𝟙 X) = 𝟙 X.fst := rfl
@[simp] lemma prod_id_snd (X : prod C D) : prod.snd (𝟙 X) = 𝟙 X.snd := rfl
@[simp] lemma prod_comp_fst {X Y Z : prod C D} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(f ≫ g).1 = f.1 ≫ g.1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma prod_comp_snd {X Y Z : prod C D} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(f ≫ g).2 = f.2 ≫ g.2 := rfl
end
section
variables (C : Type u₁) [category.{v₁} C] (D : Type u₁) [category.{v₁} D]
/--
`prod.category.uniform C D` is an additional instance specialised so both factors have the same
universe levels. This helps typeclass resolution.
-/
instance uniform_prod : category (C × D) := category_theory.prod C D
end
-- Next we define the natural functors into and out of product categories. For now this doesn't
-- address the universal properties.
namespace prod
/-- `sectl C Z` is the functor `C ⥤ C × D` given by `X ↦ (X, Z)`. -/
@[simps] def sectl
(C : Type u₁) [category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₂} [category.{v₂} D] (Z : D) : C ⥤ C × D :=
{ obj := λ X, (X, Z),
map := λ X Y f, (f, 𝟙 Z) }
/-- `sectr Z D` is the functor `D ⥤ C × D` given by `Y ↦ (Z, Y)` . -/
@[simps] def sectr
{C : Type u₁} [category.{v₁} C] (Z : C) (D : Type u₂) [category.{v₂} D] : D ⥤ C × D :=
{ obj := λ X, (Z, X),
map := λ X Y f, (𝟙 Z, f) }
variables (C : Type u₁) [category.{v₁} C] (D : Type u₂) [category.{v₂} D]
/-- `fst` is the functor `(X, Y) ↦ X`. -/
@[simps] def fst : C × D ⥤ C :=
{ obj := λ X, X.1,
map := λ X Y f, f.1 }
/-- `snd` is the functor `(X, Y) ↦ Y`. -/
@[simps] def snd : C × D ⥤ D :=
{ obj := λ X, X.2,
map := λ X Y f, f.2 }
/-- The functor swapping the factors of a cartesian product of categories, `C × D ⥤ D × C`. -/
@[simps] def swap : C × D ⥤ D × C :=
{ obj := λ X, (X.2, X.1),
map := λ _ _ f, (f.2, f.1) }
/--
Swapping the factors of a cartesion product of categories twice is naturally isomorphic
to the identity functor.
-/
@[simps] def symmetry : swap C D ⋙ swap D C ≅ 𝟭 (C × D) :=
{ hom := { app := λ X, 𝟙 X },
inv := { app := λ X, 𝟙 X } }
/--
The equivalence, given by swapping factors, between `C × D` and `D × C`.
-/
@[simps]
def braiding : C × D ≌ D × C :=
equivalence.mk (swap C D) (swap D C)
(nat_iso.of_components (λ X, eq_to_iso (by simp)) (by tidy))
(nat_iso.of_components (λ X, eq_to_iso (by simp)) (by tidy))
instance swap_is_equivalence : is_equivalence (swap C D) :=
(by apply_instance : is_equivalence (braiding C D).functor)
end prod
section
variables (C : Type u₁) [category.{v₁} C] (D : Type u₂) [category.{v₂} D]
/--
The "evaluation at `X`" functor, such that
`(evaluation.obj X).obj F = F.obj X`,
which is functorial in both `X` and `F`.
-/
@[simps] def evaluation : C ⥤ (C ⥤ D) ⥤ D :=
{ obj := λ X,
{ obj := λ F, F.obj X,
map := λ F G α, α.app X, },
map := λ X Y f,
{ app := λ F, F.map f,
naturality' := λ F G α, eq.symm (α.naturality f) } }
/--
The "evaluation of `F` at `X`" functor,
as a functor `C × (C ⥤ D) ⥤ D`.
-/
@[simps] def evaluation_uncurried : C × (C ⥤ D) ⥤ D :=
{ obj := λ p, p.2.obj p.1,
map := λ x y f, (x.2.map f.1) ≫ (f.2.app y.1),
map_comp' := λ X Y Z f g,
begin
cases g, cases f, cases Z, cases Y, cases X,
simp only [prod_comp, nat_trans.comp_app, functor.map_comp, category.assoc],
rw [←nat_trans.comp_app, nat_trans.naturality, nat_trans.comp_app,
category.assoc, nat_trans.naturality],
end }
end
variables {A : Type u₁} [category.{v₁} A]
{B : Type u₂} [category.{v₂} B]
{C : Type u₃} [category.{v₃} C]
{D : Type u₄} [category.{v₄} D]
namespace functor
/-- The cartesian product of two functors. -/
@[simps] def prod (F : A ⥤ B) (G : C ⥤ D) : A × C ⥤ B × D :=
{ obj := λ X, (F.obj X.1, G.obj X.2),
map := λ _ _ f, (F.map f.1, G.map f.2) }
/- Because of limitations in Lean 3's handling of notations, we do not setup a notation `F × G`.
You can use `F.prod G` as a "poor man's infix", or just write `functor.prod F G`. -/
end functor
namespace nat_trans
/-- The cartesian product of two natural transformations. -/
@[simps] def prod {F G : A ⥤ B} {H I : C ⥤ D} (α : F ⟶ G) (β : H ⟶ I) :
F.prod H ⟶ G.prod I :=
{ app := λ X, (α.app X.1, β.app X.2),
naturality' := λ X Y f,
begin
cases X, cases Y,
simp only [functor.prod_map, prod.mk.inj_iff, prod_comp],
split; rw naturality
end }
/- Again, it is inadvisable in Lean 3 to setup a notation `α × β`;
use instead `α.prod β` or `nat_trans.prod α β`. -/
end nat_trans
end category_theory
|
caa291221cb0fff2e6e282cd9d6e0bbae7985b6f | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/number_theory/basic.lean | 90457329569749b5992946e3a8b514b7bd7c3bc3 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 526 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.algebra.geom_sum
import Mathlib.ring_theory.ideal.basic
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes u_1
namespace Mathlib
theorem dvd_sub_pow_of_dvd_sub {R : Type u_1} [comm_ring R] {p : ℕ} {a : R} {b : R} (h : ↑p ∣ a - b) (k : ℕ) : ↑p ^ (k + 1) ∣ a ^ p ^ k - b ^ p ^ k := sorry
|
b883ec210dfed16bfa75320dc01d20762f5e98f7 | b7f22e51856f4989b970961f794f1c435f9b8f78 | /tests/lean/run/elab_bug1.lean | 0afe714e73a0e7a6019c6cabca5526790df7a40f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean | cb8aa01055ffe2af0fb99a16b4cda8463b882cd1 | 38607e3eb57f57f77c0ac114ad169e9e4262e24f | refs/heads/master | 1,611,187,284,081 | 1,450,766,737,000 | 1,476,122,547,000 | 11,513,992 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,401,763,102,000 | 1,374,182,235,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,669 | lean | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
--- Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
--- Author: Jeremy Avigad
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
import logic
open eq
open function
namespace congruence
-- TODO: move this somewhere else
definition reflexive {T : Type} (R : T → T → Prop) : Prop := ∀x, R x x
-- Congruence classes for unary and binary functions
-- -------------------------------------------------
inductive congruence [class] {T1 : Type} {T2 : Type} (R1 : T1 → T1 → Prop) (R2 : T2 → T2 → Prop)
(f : T1 → T2) : Prop :=
mk : (∀x y : T1, R1 x y → R2 (f x) (f y)) → congruence R1 R2 f
-- to trigger class inference
theorem congr_app {T1 : Type} {T2 : Type} (R1 : T1 → T1 → Prop) (R2 : T2 → T2 → Prop)
(f : T1 → T2) {C : congruence R1 R2 f} {x y : T1} : R1 x y → R2 (f x) (f y) :=
congruence.rec id C x y
-- General tools to build instances
-- --------------------------------
theorem congr_trivial [instance] {T : Type} (R : T → T → Prop) : congruence R R id :=
congruence.mk (take x y H, H)
theorem congr_const {T2 : Type} (R2 : T2 → T2 → Prop) (H : reflexive R2) :
∀(T1 : Type) (R1 : T1 → T1 → Prop) (c : T2), congruence R1 R2 (const T1 c) :=
take T1 R1 c, congruence.mk (take x y H1, H c)
-- congruences for logic
theorem congr_const_iff [instance] (T1 : Type) (R1 : T1 → T1 → Prop) (c : Prop) :
congruence R1 iff (const T1 c) := congr_const iff iff.refl T1 R1 c
theorem congr_or [instance] (T : Type) (R : T → T → Prop) (f1 f2 : T → Prop)
[H1 : congruence R iff f1] [H2 : congruence R iff f2] :
congruence R iff (λx, f1 x ∨ f2 x) := sorry
theorem congr_implies [instance] (T : Type) (R : T → T → Prop) (f1 f2 : T → Prop)
[H1 : congruence R iff f1] [H2 : congruence R iff f2] :
congruence R iff (λx, f1 x → f2 x) := sorry
theorem congr_iff [instance] (T : Type) (R : T → T → Prop) (f1 f2 : T → Prop)
[H1 : congruence R iff f1] [H2 : congruence R iff f2] :
congruence R iff (λx, f1 x ↔ f2 x) := sorry
theorem congr_not [instance] (T : Type) (R : T → T → Prop) (f : T → Prop)
[H : congruence R iff f] :
congruence R iff (λx, ¬ f x) := sorry
theorem subst_iff {T : Type} {R : T → T → Prop} {P : T → Prop} [C : congruence R iff P]
{a b : T} (H : R a b) (H1 : P a) : P b :=
-- iff_mp_left (congruence.rec id C a b H) H1
iff.elim_left (@congr_app _ _ R iff P C a b H) H1
end congruence
|
3527b103000496c4130dd151ac544f92a5b05eb9 | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /src/data/real/ennreal.lean | d733c10d3bff9e61905bdefcc9d20a78681f5556 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 62,462 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import data.real.nnreal
import data.set.intervals
/-!
# Extended non-negative reals
We define `ennreal = ℝ≥0∞ := with_no ℝ≥0` to be the type of extended nonnegative real numbers,
i.e., the interval `[0, +∞]`. This type is used as the codomain of a `measure_theory.measure`,
and of the extended distance `edist` in a `emetric_space`.
In this file we define some algebraic operations and a linear order on `ℝ≥0∞`
and prove basic properties of these operations, order, and conversions to/from `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0`, and `ℕ`.
## Main definitions
* `ℝ≥0∞`: the extended nonnegative real numbers `[0, ∞]`; defined as `with_top ℝ≥0`; it is
equipped with the following structures:
- coercion from `ℝ≥0` defined in the natural way;
- the natural structure of a complete dense linear order: `↑p ≤ ↑q ↔ p ≤ q` and `∀ a, a ≤ ∞`;
- `a + b` is defined so that `↑p + ↑q = ↑(p + q)` for `(p q : ℝ≥0)` and `a + ∞ = ∞ + a = ∞`;
- `a * b` is defined so that `↑p * ↑q = ↑(p * q)` for `(p q : ℝ≥0)`, `0 * ∞ = ∞ * 0 = 0`, and `a *
∞ = ∞ * a = ∞` for `a ≠ 0`;
- `a - b` is defined as the minimal `d` such that `a ≤ d + b`; this way we have
`↑p - ↑q = ↑(p - q)`, `∞ - ↑p = ∞`, `↑p - ∞ = ∞ - ∞ = 0`; note that there is no negation, only
subtraction;
- `a⁻¹` is defined as `Inf {b | 1 ≤ a * b}`. This way we have `(↑p)⁻¹ = ↑(p⁻¹)` for
`p : ℝ≥0`, `p ≠ 0`, `0⁻¹ = ∞`, and `∞⁻¹ = 0`.
- `a / b` is defined as `a * b⁻¹`.
The addition and multiplication defined this way together with `0 = ↑0` and `1 = ↑1` turn
`ℝ≥0∞` into a canonically ordered commutative semiring of characteristic zero.
* Coercions to/from other types:
- coercion `ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞` is defined as `has_coe`, so one can use `(p : ℝ≥0)` in a context that
expects `a : ℝ≥0∞`, and Lean will apply `coe` automatically;
- `ennreal.to_nnreal` sends `↑p` to `p` and `∞` to `0`;
- `ennreal.to_real := coe ∘ ennreal.to_nnreal` sends `↑p`, `p : ℝ≥0` to `(↑p : ℝ)` and `∞` to `0`;
- `ennreal.of_real := coe ∘ real.to_nnreal` sends `x : ℝ` to `↑⟨max x 0, _⟩`
- `ennreal.ne_top_equiv_nnreal` is an equivalence between `{a : ℝ≥0∞ // a ≠ 0}` and `ℝ≥0`.
## Implementation notes
We define a `can_lift ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0` instance, so one of the ways to prove theorems about an `ℝ≥0∞`
number `a` is to consider the cases `a = ∞` and `a ≠ ∞`, and use the tactic `lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha`
in the second case. This instance is even more useful if one already has `ha : a ≠ ∞` in the
context, or if we have `(f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : ∀ x, f x ≠ ∞)`.
## Notations
* `ℝ≥0∞`: the type of the extended nonnegative real numbers;
* `ℝ≥0`: the type of nonnegative real numbers `[0, ∞)`; defined in `data.real.nnreal`;
* `∞`: a localized notation in `ℝ≥0∞` for `⊤ : ℝ≥0∞`.
-/
noncomputable theory
open classical set
open_locale classical big_operators nnreal
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
/-- The extended nonnegative real numbers. This is usually denoted [0, ∞],
and is relevant as the codomain of a measure. -/
@[derive canonically_ordered_comm_semiring, derive complete_linear_order, derive densely_ordered,
derive nontrivial]
def ennreal := with_top ℝ≥0
localized "notation `ℝ≥0∞` := ennreal" in ennreal
localized "notation `∞` := (⊤ : ennreal)" in ennreal
instance : linear_ordered_add_comm_monoid ℝ≥0∞ :=
{ .. ennreal.canonically_ordered_comm_semiring,
.. ennreal.complete_linear_order }
namespace ennreal
variables {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0}
instance : inhabited ℝ≥0∞ := ⟨0⟩
instance : has_coe ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0∞ := ⟨ option.some ⟩
instance : can_lift ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0 :=
{ coe := coe,
cond := λ r, r ≠ ∞,
prf := λ x hx, ⟨option.get $ option.ne_none_iff_is_some.1 hx, option.some_get _⟩ }
@[simp] lemma none_eq_top : (none : ℝ≥0∞) = ∞ := rfl
@[simp] lemma some_eq_coe (a : ℝ≥0) : (some a : ℝ≥0∞) = (↑a : ℝ≥0∞) := rfl
/-- `to_nnreal x` returns `x` if it is real, otherwise 0. -/
protected def to_nnreal : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0
| (some r) := r
| none := 0
/-- `to_real x` returns `x` if it is real, `0` otherwise. -/
protected def to_real (a : ℝ≥0∞) : real := coe (a.to_nnreal)
/-- `of_real x` returns `x` if it is nonnegative, `0` otherwise. -/
protected def of_real (r : real) : ℝ≥0∞ := coe (real.to_nnreal r)
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma to_nnreal_coe : (r : ℝ≥0∞).to_nnreal = r := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_to_nnreal : ∀{a:ℝ≥0∞}, a ≠ ∞ → ↑(a.to_nnreal) = a
| (some r) h := rfl
| none h := (h rfl).elim
@[simp] lemma of_real_to_real {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a ≠ ∞) : ennreal.of_real (a.to_real) = a :=
by simp [ennreal.to_real, ennreal.of_real, h]
@[simp] lemma to_real_of_real {r : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ r) : ennreal.to_real (ennreal.of_real r) = r :=
by simp [ennreal.to_real, ennreal.of_real, real.coe_to_nnreal _ h]
lemma to_real_of_real' {r : ℝ} : ennreal.to_real (ennreal.of_real r) = max r 0 := rfl
lemma coe_to_nnreal_le_self : ∀{a:ℝ≥0∞}, ↑(a.to_nnreal) ≤ a
| (some r) := by rw [some_eq_coe, to_nnreal_coe]; exact le_refl _
| none := le_top
lemma coe_nnreal_eq (r : ℝ≥0) : (r : ℝ≥0∞) = ennreal.of_real r :=
by { rw [ennreal.of_real, real.to_nnreal], cases r with r h, congr, dsimp, rw max_eq_left h }
lemma of_real_eq_coe_nnreal {x : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) :
ennreal.of_real x = @coe ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0∞ _ (⟨x, h⟩ : ℝ≥0) :=
by { rw [coe_nnreal_eq], refl }
@[simp] lemma of_real_coe_nnreal : ennreal.of_real p = p := (coe_nnreal_eq p).symm
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ≥0) = (0 : ℝ≥0∞) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_one : ↑(1 : ℝ≥0) = (1 : ℝ≥0∞) := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_real_nonneg {a : ℝ≥0∞} : 0 ≤ a.to_real := by simp [ennreal.to_real]
@[simp] lemma top_to_nnreal : ∞.to_nnreal = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma top_to_real : ∞.to_real = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma one_to_real : (1 : ℝ≥0∞).to_real = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma one_to_nnreal : (1 : ℝ≥0∞).to_nnreal = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_to_real (r : ℝ≥0) : (r : ℝ≥0∞).to_real = r := rfl
@[simp] lemma zero_to_nnreal : (0 : ℝ≥0∞).to_nnreal = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma zero_to_real : (0 : ℝ≥0∞).to_real = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma of_real_zero : ennreal.of_real (0 : ℝ) = 0 :=
by simp [ennreal.of_real]; refl
@[simp] lemma of_real_one : ennreal.of_real (1 : ℝ) = (1 : ℝ≥0∞) :=
by simp [ennreal.of_real]
lemma of_real_to_real_le {a : ℝ≥0∞} : ennreal.of_real (a.to_real) ≤ a :=
if ha : a = ∞ then ha.symm ▸ le_top else le_of_eq (of_real_to_real ha)
lemma forall_ennreal {p : ℝ≥0∞ → Prop} : (∀a, p a) ↔ (∀r:ℝ≥0, p r) ∧ p ∞ :=
⟨assume h, ⟨assume r, h _, h _⟩,
assume ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ a, match a with some r := h₁ _ | none := h₂ end⟩
lemma forall_ne_top {p : ℝ≥0∞ → Prop} : (∀ a ≠ ∞, p a) ↔ ∀ r : ℝ≥0, p r :=
option.ball_ne_none
lemma exists_ne_top {p : ℝ≥0∞ → Prop} : (∃ a ≠ ∞, p a) ↔ ∃ r : ℝ≥0, p r :=
option.bex_ne_none
lemma to_nnreal_eq_zero_iff (x : ℝ≥0∞) : x.to_nnreal = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∨ x = ∞ :=
⟨begin
cases x,
{ simp [none_eq_top] },
{ have A : some (0:ℝ≥0) = (0:ℝ≥0∞) := rfl,
simp [ennreal.to_nnreal, A] {contextual := tt} }
end,
by intro h; cases h; simp [h]⟩
lemma to_real_eq_zero_iff (x : ℝ≥0∞) : x.to_real = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∨ x = ∞ :=
by simp [ennreal.to_real, to_nnreal_eq_zero_iff]
@[simp] lemma coe_ne_top : (r : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ ∞ := with_top.coe_ne_top
@[simp] lemma top_ne_coe : ∞ ≠ (r : ℝ≥0∞) := with_top.top_ne_coe
@[simp] lemma of_real_ne_top {r : ℝ} : ennreal.of_real r ≠ ∞ := by simp [ennreal.of_real]
@[simp] lemma of_real_lt_top {r : ℝ} : ennreal.of_real r < ∞ := lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 of_real_ne_top
@[simp] lemma top_ne_of_real {r : ℝ} : ∞ ≠ ennreal.of_real r := by simp [ennreal.of_real]
@[simp] lemma zero_ne_top : 0 ≠ ∞ := coe_ne_top
@[simp] lemma top_ne_zero : ∞ ≠ 0 := top_ne_coe
@[simp] lemma one_ne_top : 1 ≠ ∞ := coe_ne_top
@[simp] lemma top_ne_one : ∞ ≠ 1 := top_ne_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_eq_coe : (↑r : ℝ≥0∞) = ↑q ↔ r = q := with_top.coe_eq_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_le_coe : (↑r : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ ↑q ↔ r ≤ q := with_top.coe_le_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_lt_coe : (↑r : ℝ≥0∞) < ↑q ↔ r < q := with_top.coe_lt_coe
lemma coe_mono : monotone (coe : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) := λ _ _, coe_le_coe.2
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_eq_zero : (↑r : ℝ≥0∞) = 0 ↔ r = 0 := coe_eq_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma zero_eq_coe : 0 = (↑r : ℝ≥0∞) ↔ 0 = r := coe_eq_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_eq_one : (↑r : ℝ≥0∞) = 1 ↔ r = 1 := coe_eq_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma one_eq_coe : 1 = (↑r : ℝ≥0∞) ↔ 1 = r := coe_eq_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_nonneg : 0 ≤ (↑r : ℝ≥0∞) ↔ 0 ≤ r := coe_le_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_pos : 0 < (↑r : ℝ≥0∞) ↔ 0 < r := coe_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_add : ↑(r + p) = (r + p : ℝ≥0∞) := with_top.coe_add
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mul : ↑(r * p) = (r * p : ℝ≥0∞) := with_top.coe_mul
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_bit0 : (↑(bit0 r) : ℝ≥0∞) = bit0 r := coe_add
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_bit1 : (↑(bit1 r) : ℝ≥0∞) = bit1 r := by simp [bit1]
lemma coe_two : ((2:ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞) = 2 := by norm_cast
protected lemma zero_lt_one : 0 < (1 : ℝ≥0∞) :=
canonically_ordered_semiring.zero_lt_one
@[simp] lemma one_lt_two : (1 : ℝ≥0∞) < 2 :=
coe_one ▸ coe_two ▸ by exact_mod_cast (@one_lt_two ℕ _ _)
@[simp] lemma zero_lt_two : (0:ℝ≥0∞) < 2 := lt_trans ennreal.zero_lt_one one_lt_two
lemma two_ne_zero : (2:ℝ≥0∞) ≠ 0 := (ne_of_lt zero_lt_two).symm
lemma two_ne_top : (2:ℝ≥0∞) ≠ ∞ := coe_two ▸ coe_ne_top
/-- The set of numbers in `ℝ≥0∞` that are not equal to `∞` is equivalent to `ℝ≥0`. -/
def ne_top_equiv_nnreal : {a | a ≠ ∞} ≃ ℝ≥0 :=
{ to_fun := λ x, ennreal.to_nnreal x,
inv_fun := λ x, ⟨x, coe_ne_top⟩,
left_inv := λ ⟨x, hx⟩, subtype.eq $ coe_to_nnreal hx,
right_inv := λ x, to_nnreal_coe }
lemma cinfi_ne_top [has_Inf α] (f : ℝ≥0∞ → α) : (⨅ x : {x // x ≠ ∞}, f x) = ⨅ x : ℝ≥0, f x :=
eq.symm $ infi_congr _ ne_top_equiv_nnreal.symm.surjective $ λ x, rfl
lemma infi_ne_top [complete_lattice α] (f : ℝ≥0∞ → α) : (⨅ x ≠ ∞, f x) = ⨅ x : ℝ≥0, f x :=
by rw [infi_subtype', cinfi_ne_top]
lemma csupr_ne_top [has_Sup α] (f : ℝ≥0∞ → α) : (⨆ x : {x // x ≠ ∞}, f x) = ⨆ x : ℝ≥0, f x :=
@cinfi_ne_top (order_dual α) _ _
lemma supr_ne_top [complete_lattice α] (f : ℝ≥0∞ → α) : (⨆ x ≠ ∞, f x) = ⨆ x : ℝ≥0, f x :=
@infi_ne_top (order_dual α) _ _
lemma infi_ennreal {α : Type*} [complete_lattice α] {f : ℝ≥0∞ → α} :
(⨅ n, f n) = (⨅ n : ℝ≥0, f n) ⊓ f ∞ :=
le_antisymm
(le_inf (le_infi $ assume i, infi_le _ _) (infi_le _ _))
(le_infi $ forall_ennreal.2 ⟨λ r, inf_le_of_left_le $ infi_le _ _, inf_le_right⟩)
lemma supr_ennreal {α : Type*} [complete_lattice α] {f : ℝ≥0∞ → α} :
(⨆ n, f n) = (⨆ n : ℝ≥0, f n) ⊔ f ∞ :=
@infi_ennreal (order_dual α) _ _
@[simp] lemma add_top : a + ∞ = ∞ := with_top.add_top
@[simp] lemma top_add : ∞ + a = ∞ := with_top.top_add
/-- Coercion `ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞` as a `ring_hom`. -/
def of_nnreal_hom : ℝ≥0 →+* ℝ≥0∞ :=
⟨coe, coe_one, λ _ _, coe_mul, coe_zero, λ _ _, coe_add⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_of_nnreal_hom : ⇑of_nnreal_hom = coe := rfl
section actions
/-- A `mul_action` over `ℝ≥0∞` restricts to a `mul_action` over `ℝ≥0`. -/
instance {M : Type*} [mul_action ℝ≥0∞ M] : mul_action ℝ≥0 M :=
mul_action.comp_hom M of_nnreal_hom.to_monoid_hom
lemma smul_def {M : Type*} [mul_action ℝ≥0∞ M] (c : ℝ≥0) (x : M) :
c • x = (c : ℝ≥0∞) • x := rfl
instance {M N : Type*} [mul_action ℝ≥0∞ M] [mul_action ℝ≥0∞ N] [has_scalar M N]
[is_scalar_tower ℝ≥0∞ M N] : is_scalar_tower ℝ≥0 M N :=
{ smul_assoc := λ r, (smul_assoc (r : ℝ≥0∞) : _)}
instance smul_comm_class_left {M N : Type*} [mul_action ℝ≥0∞ N] [has_scalar M N]
[smul_comm_class ℝ≥0∞ M N] : smul_comm_class ℝ≥0 M N :=
{ smul_comm := λ r, (smul_comm (r : ℝ≥0∞) : _)}
instance smul_comm_class_right {M N : Type*} [mul_action ℝ≥0∞ N] [has_scalar M N]
[smul_comm_class M ℝ≥0∞ N] : smul_comm_class M ℝ≥0 N :=
{ smul_comm := λ m r, (smul_comm m (r : ℝ≥0∞) : _)}
/-- A `distrib_mul_action` over `ℝ≥0∞` restricts to a `distrib_mul_action` over `ℝ≥0`. -/
instance {M : Type*} [add_monoid M] [distrib_mul_action ℝ≥0∞ M] : distrib_mul_action ℝ≥0 M :=
distrib_mul_action.comp_hom M of_nnreal_hom.to_monoid_hom
/-- A `module` over `ℝ≥0∞` restricts to a `module` over `ℝ≥0`. -/
instance {M : Type*} [add_comm_monoid M] [module ℝ≥0∞ M] : module ℝ≥0 M :=
module.comp_hom M of_nnreal_hom
/-- An `algebra` over `ℝ≥0∞` restricts to an `algebra` over `ℝ≥0`. -/
instance {A : Type*} [semiring A] [algebra ℝ≥0∞ A] : algebra ℝ≥0 A :=
{ smul := (•),
commutes' := λ r x, by simp [algebra.commutes],
smul_def' := λ r x, by simp [←algebra.smul_def (r : ℝ≥0∞) x, smul_def],
to_ring_hom := ((algebra_map ℝ≥0∞ A).comp (of_nnreal_hom : ℝ≥0 →+* ℝ≥0∞)) }
-- verify that the above produces instances we might care about
example : algebra ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0∞ := by apply_instance
example : distrib_mul_action (units ℝ≥0) ℝ≥0∞ := by apply_instance
end actions
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_indicator {α} (s : set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) (a : α) :
((s.indicator f a : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞) = s.indicator (λ x, f x) a :=
(of_nnreal_hom : ℝ≥0 →+ ℝ≥0∞).map_indicator _ _ _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_pow (n : ℕ) : (↑(r^n) : ℝ≥0∞) = r^n :=
of_nnreal_hom.map_pow r n
@[simp] lemma add_eq_top : a + b = ∞ ↔ a = ∞ ∨ b = ∞ := with_top.add_eq_top
@[simp] lemma add_lt_top : a + b < ∞ ↔ a < ∞ ∧ b < ∞ := with_top.add_lt_top
lemma to_nnreal_add {r₁ r₂ : ℝ≥0∞} (h₁ : r₁ < ∞) (h₂ : r₂ < ∞) :
(r₁ + r₂).to_nnreal = r₁.to_nnreal + r₂.to_nnreal :=
begin
rw [← coe_eq_coe, coe_add, coe_to_nnreal, coe_to_nnreal, coe_to_nnreal];
apply @ne_top_of_lt ℝ≥0∞ _ _ ∞,
exact h₂,
exact h₁,
exact add_lt_top.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
end
/- rw has trouble with the generic lt_top_iff_ne_top and bot_lt_iff_ne_bot
(contrary to erw). This is solved with the next lemmas -/
protected lemma lt_top_iff_ne_top : a < ∞ ↔ a ≠ ∞ := lt_top_iff_ne_top
protected lemma bot_lt_iff_ne_bot : 0 < a ↔ a ≠ 0 := bot_lt_iff_ne_bot
lemma not_lt_top {x : ℝ≥0∞} : ¬ x < ∞ ↔ x = ∞ := by rw [lt_top_iff_ne_top, not_not]
lemma add_ne_top : a + b ≠ ∞ ↔ a ≠ ∞ ∧ b ≠ ∞ :=
by simpa only [lt_top_iff_ne_top] using add_lt_top
lemma mul_top : a * ∞ = (if a = 0 then 0 else ∞) :=
begin split_ifs, { simp [h] }, { exact with_top.mul_top h } end
lemma top_mul : ∞ * a = (if a = 0 then 0 else ∞) :=
begin split_ifs, { simp [h] }, { exact with_top.top_mul h } end
@[simp] lemma top_mul_top : ∞ * ∞ = ∞ := with_top.top_mul_top
lemma top_pow {n:ℕ} (h : 0 < n) : ∞^n = ∞ :=
nat.le_induction (pow_one _) (λ m hm hm', by rw [pow_succ, hm', top_mul_top])
_ (nat.succ_le_of_lt h)
lemma mul_eq_top : a * b = ∞ ↔ (a ≠ 0 ∧ b = ∞) ∨ (a = ∞ ∧ b ≠ 0) :=
with_top.mul_eq_top_iff
lemma mul_lt_top : a < ∞ → b < ∞ → a * b < ∞ :=
with_top.mul_lt_top
lemma mul_ne_top : a ≠ ∞ → b ≠ ∞ → a * b ≠ ∞ :=
by simpa only [lt_top_iff_ne_top] using mul_lt_top
lemma ne_top_of_mul_ne_top_left (h : a * b ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ 0) : a ≠ ∞ :=
by { simp [mul_eq_top, hb, not_or_distrib] at h ⊢, exact h.2 }
lemma ne_top_of_mul_ne_top_right (h : a * b ≠ ∞) (ha : a ≠ 0) : b ≠ ∞ :=
ne_top_of_mul_ne_top_left (by rwa [mul_comm]) ha
lemma lt_top_of_mul_lt_top_left (h : a * b < ∞) (hb : b ≠ 0) : a < ∞ :=
by { rw [ennreal.lt_top_iff_ne_top] at h ⊢, exact ne_top_of_mul_ne_top_left h hb }
lemma lt_top_of_mul_lt_top_right (h : a * b < ∞) (ha : a ≠ 0) : b < ∞ :=
lt_top_of_mul_lt_top_left (by rwa [mul_comm]) ha
lemma mul_lt_top_iff {a b : ℝ≥0∞} : a * b < ∞ ↔ (a < ∞ ∧ b < ∞) ∨ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
begin
split,
{ intro h, rw [← or_assoc, or_iff_not_imp_right, or_iff_not_imp_right], intros hb ha,
exact ⟨lt_top_of_mul_lt_top_left h hb, lt_top_of_mul_lt_top_right h ha⟩ },
{ rintro (⟨ha, hb⟩|rfl|rfl); [exact mul_lt_top ha hb, simp, simp] }
end
lemma mul_self_lt_top_iff {a : ℝ≥0∞} : a * a < ⊤ ↔ a < ⊤ :=
by { rw [ennreal.mul_lt_top_iff, and_self, or_self, or_iff_left_iff_imp], rintro rfl, norm_num }
@[simp] lemma mul_pos : 0 < a * b ↔ 0 < a ∧ 0 < b :=
by simp only [pos_iff_ne_zero, ne.def, mul_eq_zero, not_or_distrib]
lemma pow_eq_top : ∀ n:ℕ, a^n=∞ → a=∞
| 0 := by simp
| (n+1) := λ o, by { rw pow_succ at o,
exact (mul_eq_top.1 o).elim (λ h, pow_eq_top n h.2) and.left }
lemma pow_ne_top (h : a ≠ ∞) {n:ℕ} : a^n ≠ ∞ :=
mt (pow_eq_top n) h
lemma pow_lt_top : a < ∞ → ∀ n:ℕ, a^n < ∞ :=
by simpa only [lt_top_iff_ne_top] using pow_ne_top
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_finset_sum {s : finset α} {f : α → ℝ≥0} :
↑(∑ a in s, f a) = (∑ a in s, f a : ℝ≥0∞) :=
of_nnreal_hom.map_sum f s
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_finset_prod {s : finset α} {f : α → ℝ≥0} :
↑(∏ a in s, f a) = ((∏ a in s, f a) : ℝ≥0∞) :=
of_nnreal_hom.map_prod f s
section order
@[simp] lemma bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : ℝ≥0∞) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_lt_top : coe r < ∞ := with_top.coe_lt_top r
@[simp] lemma not_top_le_coe : ¬ ∞ ≤ ↑r := with_top.not_top_le_coe r
lemma zero_lt_coe_iff : 0 < (↑p : ℝ≥0∞) ↔ 0 < p := coe_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma one_le_coe_iff : (1:ℝ≥0∞) ≤ ↑r ↔ 1 ≤ r := coe_le_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_le_one_iff : ↑r ≤ (1:ℝ≥0∞) ↔ r ≤ 1 := coe_le_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_lt_one_iff : (↑p : ℝ≥0∞) < 1 ↔ p < 1 := coe_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma one_lt_coe_iff : 1 < (↑p : ℝ≥0∞) ↔ 1 < p := coe_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_nat (n : ℕ) : ((n : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞) = n := with_top.coe_nat n
@[simp] lemma of_real_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : ennreal.of_real n = n := by simp [ennreal.of_real]
@[simp] lemma nat_ne_top (n : ℕ) : (n : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ ∞ := with_top.nat_ne_top n
@[simp] lemma top_ne_nat (n : ℕ) : ∞ ≠ n := with_top.top_ne_nat n
@[simp] lemma one_lt_top : 1 < ∞ := coe_lt_top
lemma le_coe_iff : a ≤ ↑r ↔ (∃p:ℝ≥0, a = p ∧ p ≤ r) := with_top.le_coe_iff
lemma coe_le_iff : ↑r ≤ a ↔ (∀p:ℝ≥0, a = p → r ≤ p) := with_top.coe_le_iff
lemma lt_iff_exists_coe : a < b ↔ (∃p:ℝ≥0, a = p ∧ ↑p < b) := with_top.lt_iff_exists_coe
lemma to_real_le_coe_of_le_coe {a : ℝ≥0∞} {b : ℝ≥0} (h : a ≤ b) : a.to_real ≤ b :=
show ↑a.to_nnreal ≤ ↑b,
begin
have : ↑a.to_nnreal = a := ennreal.coe_to_nnreal (lt_of_le_of_lt h coe_lt_top).ne,
rw ← this at h,
exact_mod_cast h
end
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_finset_sup {s : finset α} {f : α → ℝ≥0} :
↑(s.sup f) = s.sup (λ x, (f x : ℝ≥0∞)) :=
finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp_of_is_total _ coe_mono rfl
lemma pow_le_pow {n m : ℕ} (ha : 1 ≤ a) (h : n ≤ m) : a ^ n ≤ a ^ m :=
begin
cases a,
{ cases m,
{ rw eq_bot_iff.mpr h,
exact le_refl _ },
{ rw [none_eq_top, top_pow (nat.succ_pos m)],
exact le_top } },
{ rw [some_eq_coe, ← coe_pow, ← coe_pow, coe_le_coe],
exact pow_le_pow (by simpa using ha) h }
end
@[simp] lemma max_eq_zero_iff : max a b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
by simp only [nonpos_iff_eq_zero.symm, max_le_iff]
@[simp] lemma max_zero_left : max 0 a = a := max_eq_right (zero_le a)
@[simp] lemma max_zero_right : max a 0 = a := max_eq_left (zero_le a)
-- TODO: why this is not a `rfl`? There is some hidden diamond here.
@[simp] lemma sup_eq_max : a ⊔ b = max a b :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ c, sup_le_iff.trans max_le_iff.symm
protected lemma pow_pos : 0 < a → ∀ n : ℕ, 0 < a^n :=
canonically_ordered_semiring.pow_pos
protected lemma pow_ne_zero : a ≠ 0 → ∀ n : ℕ, a^n ≠ 0 :=
by simpa only [pos_iff_ne_zero] using ennreal.pow_pos
@[simp] lemma not_lt_zero : ¬ a < 0 := by simp
lemma add_lt_add_iff_left : a < ∞ → (a + c < a + b ↔ c < b) :=
with_top.add_lt_add_iff_left
lemma add_lt_add_iff_right : a < ∞ → (c + a < b + a ↔ c < b) :=
with_top.add_lt_add_iff_right
lemma lt_add_right (ha : a < ∞) (hb : 0 < b) : a < a + b :=
by rwa [← add_lt_add_iff_left ha, add_zero] at hb
lemma le_of_forall_pos_le_add : ∀{a b : ℝ≥0∞}, (∀ε:ℝ≥0, 0 < ε → b < ∞ → a ≤ b + ε) → a ≤ b
| a none h := le_top
| none (some a) h :=
have ∞ ≤ ↑a + ↑(1:ℝ≥0), from h 1 zero_lt_one coe_lt_top,
by rw [← coe_add] at this; exact (not_top_le_coe this).elim
| (some a) (some b) h :=
by simp only [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, coe_add.symm, coe_le_coe, coe_lt_top, true_implies_iff]
at *; exact nnreal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add h
lemma lt_iff_exists_rat_btwn :
a < b ↔ (∃q:ℚ, 0 ≤ q ∧ a < real.to_nnreal q ∧ (real.to_nnreal q:ℝ≥0∞) < b) :=
⟨λ h,
begin
rcases lt_iff_exists_coe.1 h with ⟨p, rfl, _⟩,
rcases exists_between h with ⟨c, pc, cb⟩,
rcases lt_iff_exists_coe.1 cb with ⟨r, rfl, _⟩,
rcases (nnreal.lt_iff_exists_rat_btwn _ _).1 (coe_lt_coe.1 pc) with ⟨q, hq0, pq, qr⟩,
exact ⟨q, hq0, coe_lt_coe.2 pq, lt_trans (coe_lt_coe.2 qr) cb⟩
end,
λ ⟨q, q0, qa, qb⟩, lt_trans qa qb⟩
lemma lt_iff_exists_real_btwn :
a < b ↔ (∃r:ℝ, 0 ≤ r ∧ a < ennreal.of_real r ∧ (ennreal.of_real r:ℝ≥0∞) < b) :=
⟨λ h, let ⟨q, q0, aq, qb⟩ := ennreal.lt_iff_exists_rat_btwn.1 h in
⟨q, rat.cast_nonneg.2 q0, aq, qb⟩,
λ ⟨q, q0, qa, qb⟩, lt_trans qa qb⟩
lemma lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn :
a < b ↔ (∃r:ℝ≥0, a < r ∧ (r : ℝ≥0∞) < b) :=
with_top.lt_iff_exists_coe_btwn
lemma lt_iff_exists_add_pos_lt : a < b ↔ (∃ r : ℝ≥0, 0 < r ∧ a + r < b) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ hab, _, λ ⟨r, rpos, hr⟩, lt_of_le_of_lt (le_self_add) hr⟩,
cases a, { simpa using hab },
rcases lt_iff_exists_real_btwn.1 hab with ⟨c, c_nonneg, ac, cb⟩,
let d : ℝ≥0 := ⟨c, c_nonneg⟩,
have ad : a < d,
{ rw of_real_eq_coe_nnreal c_nonneg at ac,
exact coe_lt_coe.1 ac },
refine ⟨d-a, nnreal.sub_pos.2 ad, _⟩,
rw [some_eq_coe, ← coe_add],
convert cb,
have : real.to_nnreal c = d,
by { rw [← nnreal.coe_eq, real.coe_to_nnreal _ c_nonneg], refl },
rw [add_comm, this],
exact nnreal.sub_add_cancel_of_le (le_of_lt ad)
end
lemma coe_nat_lt_coe {n : ℕ} : (n : ℝ≥0∞) < r ↔ ↑n < r := ennreal.coe_nat n ▸ coe_lt_coe
lemma coe_lt_coe_nat {n : ℕ} : (r : ℝ≥0∞) < n ↔ r < n := ennreal.coe_nat n ▸ coe_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_nat_lt_coe_nat {m n : ℕ} : (m : ℝ≥0∞) < n ↔ m < n :=
ennreal.coe_nat n ▸ coe_nat_lt_coe.trans nat.cast_lt
lemma coe_nat_ne_top {n : ℕ} : (n : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ ∞ := ennreal.coe_nat n ▸ coe_ne_top
lemma coe_nat_mono : strict_mono (coe : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) := λ _ _, coe_nat_lt_coe_nat.2
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_nat_le_coe_nat {m n : ℕ} : (m : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n :=
coe_nat_mono.le_iff_le
instance : char_zero ℝ≥0∞ := ⟨coe_nat_mono.injective⟩
protected lemma exists_nat_gt {r : ℝ≥0∞} (h : r ≠ ∞) : ∃n:ℕ, r < n :=
begin
lift r to ℝ≥0 using h,
rcases exists_nat_gt r with ⟨n, hn⟩,
exact ⟨n, coe_lt_coe_nat.2 hn⟩,
end
lemma add_lt_add (ac : a < c) (bd : b < d) : a + b < c + d :=
begin
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ne_top_of_lt ac,
lift b to ℝ≥0 using ne_top_of_lt bd,
cases c, { simp }, cases d, { simp },
simp only [← coe_add, some_eq_coe, coe_lt_coe] at *,
exact add_lt_add ac bd
end
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_min : ((min r p:ℝ≥0):ℝ≥0∞) = min r p :=
coe_mono.map_min
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_max : ((max r p:ℝ≥0):ℝ≥0∞) = max r p :=
coe_mono.map_max
lemma le_of_top_imp_top_of_to_nnreal_le {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a = ⊤ → b = ⊤)
(h_nnreal : a ≠ ⊤ → b ≠ ⊤ → a.to_nnreal ≤ b.to_nnreal) :
a ≤ b :=
begin
by_cases ha : a = ⊤,
{ rw h ha,
exact le_top, },
by_cases hb : b = ⊤,
{ rw hb,
exact le_top, },
rw [←coe_to_nnreal hb, ←coe_to_nnreal ha, coe_le_coe],
exact h_nnreal ha hb,
end
end order
section complete_lattice
lemma coe_Sup {s : set ℝ≥0} : bdd_above s → (↑(Sup s) : ℝ≥0∞) = (⨆a∈s, ↑a) := with_top.coe_Sup
lemma coe_Inf {s : set ℝ≥0} : s.nonempty → (↑(Inf s) : ℝ≥0∞) = (⨅a∈s, ↑a) := with_top.coe_Inf
@[simp] lemma top_mem_upper_bounds {s : set ℝ≥0∞} : ∞ ∈ upper_bounds s :=
assume x hx, le_top
lemma coe_mem_upper_bounds {s : set ℝ≥0} :
↑r ∈ upper_bounds ((coe : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) '' s) ↔ r ∈ upper_bounds s :=
by simp [upper_bounds, ball_image_iff, -mem_image, *] {contextual := tt}
end complete_lattice
section mul
@[mono] lemma mul_le_mul : a ≤ b → c ≤ d → a * c ≤ b * d :=
canonically_ordered_semiring.mul_le_mul
@[mono] lemma mul_lt_mul (ac : a < c) (bd : b < d) : a * b < c * d :=
begin
rcases lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 ac with ⟨a', aa', a'c⟩,
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ne_top_of_lt aa',
rcases lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 bd with ⟨b', bb', b'd⟩,
lift b to ℝ≥0 using ne_top_of_lt bb',
norm_cast at *,
calc ↑(a * b) < ↑(a' * b') :
coe_lt_coe.2 (mul_lt_mul' aa'.le bb' (zero_le _) ((zero_le a).trans_lt aa'))
... = ↑a' * ↑b' : coe_mul
... ≤ c * d : mul_le_mul a'c.le b'd.le
end
lemma mul_left_mono : monotone ((*) a) := λ b c, mul_le_mul (le_refl a)
lemma mul_right_mono : monotone (λ x, x * a) := λ b c h, mul_le_mul h (le_refl a)
lemma max_mul : max a b * c = max (a * c) (b * c) :=
mul_right_mono.map_max
lemma mul_max : a * max b c = max (a * b) (a * c) :=
mul_left_mono.map_max
lemma mul_eq_mul_left : a ≠ 0 → a ≠ ∞ → (a * b = a * c ↔ b = c) :=
begin
cases a; cases b; cases c;
simp [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, mul_top, top_mul, -coe_mul, coe_mul.symm,
nnreal.mul_eq_mul_left] {contextual := tt},
end
lemma mul_eq_mul_right : c ≠ 0 → c ≠ ∞ → (a * c = b * c ↔ a = b) :=
mul_comm c a ▸ mul_comm c b ▸ mul_eq_mul_left
lemma mul_le_mul_left : a ≠ 0 → a ≠ ∞ → (a * b ≤ a * c ↔ b ≤ c) :=
begin
cases a; cases b; cases c;
simp [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, mul_top, top_mul, -coe_mul, coe_mul.symm] {contextual := tt},
assume h, exact mul_le_mul_left (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h)
end
lemma mul_le_mul_right : c ≠ 0 → c ≠ ∞ → (a * c ≤ b * c ↔ a ≤ b) :=
mul_comm c a ▸ mul_comm c b ▸ mul_le_mul_left
lemma mul_lt_mul_left : a ≠ 0 → a ≠ ∞ → (a * b < a * c ↔ b < c) :=
λ h0 ht, by simp only [mul_le_mul_left h0 ht, lt_iff_le_not_le]
lemma mul_lt_mul_right : c ≠ 0 → c ≠ ∞ → (a * c < b * c ↔ a < b) :=
mul_comm c a ▸ mul_comm c b ▸ mul_lt_mul_left
end mul
section sub
instance : has_sub ℝ≥0∞ := ⟨λa b, Inf {d | a ≤ d + b}⟩
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_sub : ↑(p - r) = (↑p:ℝ≥0∞) - r :=
le_antisymm
(le_Inf $ assume b (hb : ↑p ≤ b + r), coe_le_iff.2 $
by rintros d rfl; rwa [← coe_add, coe_le_coe, ← nnreal.sub_le_iff_le_add] at hb)
(Inf_le $ show (↑p : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ ↑(p - r) + ↑r,
by rw [← coe_add, coe_le_coe, ← nnreal.sub_le_iff_le_add])
@[simp] lemma top_sub_coe : ∞ - ↑r = ∞ :=
top_unique $ le_Inf $ by simp [add_eq_top]
@[simp] lemma sub_eq_zero_of_le (h : a ≤ b) : a - b = 0 :=
le_antisymm (Inf_le $ le_add_left h) (zero_le _)
@[simp] lemma sub_self : a - a = 0 := sub_eq_zero_of_le $ le_refl _
@[simp] lemma zero_sub : 0 - a = 0 :=
le_antisymm (Inf_le $ zero_le $ 0 + a) (zero_le _)
@[simp] lemma sub_infty : a - ∞ = 0 :=
le_antisymm (Inf_le $ by simp) (zero_le _)
lemma sub_le_sub (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : d ≤ c) : a - c ≤ b - d :=
Inf_le_Inf $ assume e (h : b ≤ e + d),
calc a ≤ b : h₁
... ≤ e + d : h
... ≤ e + c : add_le_add (le_refl _) h₂
@[simp] lemma add_sub_self : ∀{a b : ℝ≥0∞}, b < ∞ → (a + b) - b = a
| a none := by simp [none_eq_top]
| none (some b) := by simp [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe]
| (some a) (some b) :=
by simp [some_eq_coe]; rw [← coe_add, ← coe_sub, coe_eq_coe, nnreal.add_sub_cancel]
@[simp] lemma add_sub_self' (h : a < ∞) : (a + b) - a = b :=
by rw [add_comm, add_sub_self h]
lemma add_right_inj (h : a < ∞) : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c :=
⟨λ e, by simpa [h] using congr_arg (λ x, x - a) e, congr_arg _⟩
lemma add_left_inj (h : a < ∞) : b + a = c + a ↔ b = c :=
by rw [add_comm, add_comm c, add_right_inj h]
@[simp] lemma sub_add_cancel_of_le : ∀{a b : ℝ≥0∞}, b ≤ a → (a - b) + b = a :=
begin
simp [forall_ennreal, le_coe_iff, -add_comm] {contextual := tt},
rintros r p x rfl h,
rw [← coe_sub, ← coe_add, nnreal.sub_add_cancel_of_le h]
end
@[simp] lemma add_sub_cancel_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : b + (a - b) = a :=
by rwa [add_comm, sub_add_cancel_of_le]
lemma sub_add_self_eq_max : (a - b) + b = max a b :=
match le_total a b with
| or.inl h := by simp [h, max_eq_right]
| or.inr h := by simp [h, max_eq_left]
end
lemma le_sub_add_self : a ≤ (a - b) + b :=
by { rw sub_add_self_eq_max, exact le_max_left a b }
@[simp] protected lemma sub_le_iff_le_add : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c + b :=
iff.intro
(assume h : a - b ≤ c,
calc a ≤ (a - b) + b : le_sub_add_self
... ≤ c + b : add_le_add_right h _)
(assume h : a ≤ c + b, Inf_le h)
protected lemma sub_le_iff_le_add' : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b + c :=
add_comm c b ▸ ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add
lemma sub_eq_of_add_eq : b ≠ ∞ → a + b = c → c - b = a :=
λ hb hc, hc ▸ add_sub_self (lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 hb)
protected lemma sub_le_of_sub_le (h : a - b ≤ c) : a - c ≤ b :=
ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add.2 $ by { rw add_comm, exact ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add.1 h }
protected lemma sub_lt_self : a ≠ ∞ → a ≠ 0 → 0 < b → a - b < a :=
match a, b with
| none, _ := by { have := none_eq_top, assume h, contradiction }
| (some a), none := by {intros, simp only [none_eq_top, sub_infty, pos_iff_ne_zero], assumption}
| (some a), (some b) :=
begin
simp only [some_eq_coe, coe_sub.symm, coe_pos, coe_eq_zero, coe_lt_coe, ne.def],
assume h₁ h₂, apply nnreal.sub_lt_self, exact pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h₂
end
end
@[simp] lemma sub_eq_zero_iff_le : a - b = 0 ↔ a ≤ b :=
by simpa [-ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add] using @ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add a b 0
@[simp] lemma zero_lt_sub_iff_lt : 0 < a - b ↔ b < a :=
by simpa [ennreal.bot_lt_iff_ne_bot, -sub_eq_zero_iff_le]
using not_iff_not.2 (@sub_eq_zero_iff_le a b)
lemma lt_sub_iff_add_lt : a < b - c ↔ a + c < b :=
begin
cases a, { simp },
cases c, { simp },
cases b, { simp only [true_iff, coe_lt_top, some_eq_coe, top_sub_coe, none_eq_top, ← coe_add] },
simp only [some_eq_coe],
rw [← coe_add, ← coe_sub, coe_lt_coe, coe_lt_coe, nnreal.lt_sub_iff_add_lt],
end
lemma sub_le_self (a b : ℝ≥0∞) : a - b ≤ a :=
ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add.2 $ le_self_add
@[simp] lemma sub_zero : a - 0 = a :=
eq.trans (add_zero (a - 0)).symm $ by simp
/-- A version of triangle inequality for difference as a "distance". -/
lemma sub_le_sub_add_sub : a - c ≤ a - b + (b - c) :=
ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add.2 $
calc a ≤ a - b + b : le_sub_add_self
... ≤ a - b + ((b - c) + c) : add_le_add_left le_sub_add_self _
... = a - b + (b - c) + c : (add_assoc _ _ _).symm
lemma sub_sub_cancel (h : a < ∞) (h2 : b ≤ a) : a - (a - b) = b :=
by rw [← add_left_inj (lt_of_le_of_lt (sub_le_self _ _) h),
sub_add_cancel_of_le (sub_le_self _ _), add_sub_cancel_of_le h2]
lemma sub_right_inj {a b c : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a < ∞) (hb : b ≤ a) (hc : c ≤ a) :
a - b = a - c ↔ b = c :=
iff.intro
begin
assume h, have : a - (a - b) = a - (a - c), rw h,
rw [sub_sub_cancel ha hb, sub_sub_cancel ha hc] at this, exact this
end
(λ h, by rw h)
lemma sub_mul (h : 0 < b → b < a → c ≠ ∞) : (a - b) * c = a * c - b * c :=
begin
cases le_or_lt a b with hab hab,
{ simp [hab, mul_right_mono hab] },
symmetry,
cases eq_or_lt_of_le (zero_le b) with hb hb,
{ subst b, simp },
apply sub_eq_of_add_eq,
{ exact mul_ne_top (ne_top_of_lt hab) (h hb hab) },
rw [← add_mul, sub_add_cancel_of_le (le_of_lt hab)]
end
lemma mul_sub (h : 0 < c → c < b → a ≠ ∞) :
a * (b - c) = a * b - a * c :=
by { simp only [mul_comm a], exact sub_mul h }
lemma sub_mul_ge : a * c - b * c ≤ (a - b) * c :=
begin
-- with `0 < b → b < a → c ≠ ∞` Lean names the first variable `a`
by_cases h : ∀ (hb : 0 < b), b < a → c ≠ ∞,
{ rw [sub_mul h],
exact le_refl _ },
{ push_neg at h,
rcases h with ⟨hb, hba, hc⟩,
subst c,
simp only [mul_top, if_neg (ne_of_gt hb), if_neg (ne_of_gt $ lt_trans hb hba), sub_self,
zero_le] }
end
end sub
section sum
open finset
/-- A product of finite numbers is still finite -/
lemma prod_lt_top {s : finset α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀a∈s, f a < ∞) : (∏ a in s, f a) < ∞ :=
with_top.prod_lt_top h
/-- A sum of finite numbers is still finite -/
lemma sum_lt_top {s : finset α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} :
(∀a∈s, f a < ∞) → ∑ a in s, f a < ∞ :=
with_top.sum_lt_top
/-- A sum of finite numbers is still finite -/
lemma sum_lt_top_iff {s : finset α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} :
∑ a in s, f a < ∞ ↔ (∀a∈s, f a < ∞) :=
with_top.sum_lt_top_iff
/-- A sum of numbers is infinite iff one of them is infinite -/
lemma sum_eq_top_iff {s : finset α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} :
(∑ x in s, f x) = ∞ ↔ (∃a∈s, f a = ∞) :=
with_top.sum_eq_top_iff
/-- seeing `ℝ≥0∞` as `ℝ≥0` does not change their sum, unless one of the `ℝ≥0∞` is
infinity -/
lemma to_nnreal_sum {s : finset α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀a∈s, f a < ∞) :
ennreal.to_nnreal (∑ a in s, f a) = ∑ a in s, ennreal.to_nnreal (f a) :=
begin
rw [← coe_eq_coe, coe_to_nnreal, coe_finset_sum, sum_congr],
{ refl },
{ intros x hx, exact (coe_to_nnreal (hf x hx).ne).symm },
{ exact (sum_lt_top hf).ne }
end
/-- seeing `ℝ≥0∞` as `real` does not change their sum, unless one of the `ℝ≥0∞` is infinity -/
lemma to_real_sum {s : finset α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀a∈s, f a < ∞) :
ennreal.to_real (∑ a in s, f a) = ∑ a in s, ennreal.to_real (f a) :=
by { rw [ennreal.to_real, to_nnreal_sum hf, nnreal.coe_sum], refl }
lemma of_real_sum_of_nonneg {s : finset α} {f : α → ℝ} (hf : ∀ i, i ∈ s → 0 ≤ f i) :
ennreal.of_real (∑ i in s, f i) = ∑ i in s, ennreal.of_real (f i) :=
begin
simp_rw [ennreal.of_real, ←coe_finset_sum, coe_eq_coe],
exact real.to_nnreal_sum_of_nonneg hf,
end
end sum
section interval
variables {x y z : ℝ≥0∞} {ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ≥0∞} {s : set ℝ≥0∞}
protected lemma Ico_eq_Iio : (Ico 0 y) = (Iio y) :=
ext $ assume a, iff.intro
(assume ⟨_, hx⟩, hx)
(assume hx, ⟨zero_le _, hx⟩)
lemma mem_Iio_self_add : x ≠ ∞ → 0 < ε → x ∈ Iio (x + ε) :=
assume xt ε0, lt_add_right (by rwa lt_top_iff_ne_top) ε0
lemma not_mem_Ioo_self_sub : x = 0 → x ∉ Ioo (x - ε) y :=
assume x0, by simp [x0]
lemma mem_Ioo_self_sub_add : x ≠ ∞ → x ≠ 0 → 0 < ε₁ → 0 < ε₂ → x ∈ Ioo (x - ε₁) (x + ε₂) :=
assume xt x0 ε0 ε0',
⟨ennreal.sub_lt_self xt x0 ε0, lt_add_right (by rwa [lt_top_iff_ne_top]) ε0'⟩
end interval
section bit
@[simp] lemma bit0_inj : bit0 a = bit0 b ↔ a = b :=
⟨λh, begin
rcases (lt_trichotomy a b) with h₁| h₂| h₃,
{ exact (absurd h (ne_of_lt (add_lt_add h₁ h₁))) },
{ exact h₂ },
{ exact (absurd h.symm (ne_of_lt (add_lt_add h₃ h₃))) }
end,
λh, congr_arg _ h⟩
@[simp] lemma bit0_eq_zero_iff : bit0 a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
by simpa only [bit0_zero] using @bit0_inj a 0
@[simp] lemma bit0_eq_top_iff : bit0 a = ∞ ↔ a = ∞ :=
by rw [bit0, add_eq_top, or_self]
@[simp] lemma bit1_inj : bit1 a = bit1 b ↔ a = b :=
⟨λh, begin
unfold bit1 at h,
rwa [add_left_inj, bit0_inj] at h,
simp [lt_top_iff_ne_top]
end,
λh, congr_arg _ h⟩
@[simp] lemma bit1_ne_zero : bit1 a ≠ 0 :=
by unfold bit1; simp
@[simp] lemma bit1_eq_one_iff : bit1 a = 1 ↔ a = 0 :=
by simpa only [bit1_zero] using @bit1_inj a 0
@[simp] lemma bit1_eq_top_iff : bit1 a = ∞ ↔ a = ∞ :=
by unfold bit1; rw add_eq_top; simp
end bit
section inv
instance : has_inv ℝ≥0∞ := ⟨λa, Inf {b | 1 ≤ a * b}⟩
instance : div_inv_monoid ℝ≥0∞ :=
{ inv := has_inv.inv,
.. (infer_instance : monoid ℝ≥0∞) }
@[simp] lemma inv_zero : (0 : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ = ∞ :=
show Inf {b : ℝ≥0∞ | 1 ≤ 0 * b} = ∞, by simp; refl
@[simp] lemma inv_top : ∞⁻¹ = 0 :=
bot_unique $ le_of_forall_le_of_dense $ λ a (h : a > 0), Inf_le $ by simp [*, ne_of_gt h, top_mul]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_inv (hr : r ≠ 0) : (↑r⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) = (↑r)⁻¹ :=
le_antisymm
(le_Inf $ assume b (hb : 1 ≤ ↑r * b), coe_le_iff.2 $
by rintros b rfl; rwa [← coe_mul, ← coe_one, coe_le_coe, ← nnreal.inv_le hr] at hb)
(Inf_le $ by simp; rw [← coe_mul, mul_inv_cancel hr]; exact le_refl 1)
lemma coe_inv_le : (↑r⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ (↑r)⁻¹ :=
if hr : r = 0 then by simp only [hr, inv_zero, coe_zero, le_top]
else by simp only [coe_inv hr, le_refl]
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_inv_two : ((2⁻¹:ℝ≥0):ℝ≥0∞) = 2⁻¹ :=
by rw [coe_inv (ne_of_gt _root_.zero_lt_two), coe_two]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_div (hr : r ≠ 0) : (↑(p / r) : ℝ≥0∞) = p / r :=
by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, coe_mul, coe_inv hr]
@[simp] lemma inv_one : (1:ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ = 1 :=
by simpa only [coe_inv one_ne_zero, coe_one] using coe_eq_coe.2 inv_one
@[simp] lemma div_one {a : ℝ≥0∞} : a / 1 = a :=
by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_one, mul_one]
protected lemma inv_pow {n : ℕ} : (a^n)⁻¹ = (a⁻¹)^n :=
begin
by_cases a = 0; cases a; cases n; simp [*, none_eq_top, some_eq_coe,
zero_pow, top_pow, nat.zero_lt_succ] at *,
rw [← coe_inv h, ← coe_pow, ← coe_inv (pow_ne_zero _ h), ← inv_pow', coe_pow]
end
@[simp] lemma inv_inv : (a⁻¹)⁻¹ = a :=
by by_cases a = 0; cases a; simp [*, none_eq_top, some_eq_coe,
-coe_inv, (coe_inv _).symm] at *
lemma inv_involutive : function.involutive (λ a:ℝ≥0∞, a⁻¹) :=
λ a, ennreal.inv_inv
lemma inv_bijective : function.bijective (λ a:ℝ≥0∞, a⁻¹) :=
ennreal.inv_involutive.bijective
@[simp] lemma inv_eq_inv : a⁻¹ = b⁻¹ ↔ a = b := inv_bijective.1.eq_iff
@[simp] lemma inv_eq_top : a⁻¹ = ∞ ↔ a = 0 :=
inv_zero ▸ inv_eq_inv
lemma inv_ne_top : a⁻¹ ≠ ∞ ↔ a ≠ 0 := by simp
@[simp] lemma inv_lt_top {x : ℝ≥0∞} : x⁻¹ < ∞ ↔ 0 < x :=
by { simp only [lt_top_iff_ne_top, inv_ne_top, pos_iff_ne_zero] }
lemma div_lt_top {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (h1 : x < ∞) (h2 : 0 < y) : x / y < ∞ :=
mul_lt_top h1 (inv_lt_top.mpr h2)
@[simp] lemma inv_eq_zero : a⁻¹ = 0 ↔ a = ∞ :=
inv_top ▸ inv_eq_inv
lemma inv_ne_zero : a⁻¹ ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ ∞ := by simp
@[simp] lemma inv_pos : 0 < a⁻¹ ↔ a ≠ ∞ :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans inv_ne_zero
@[simp] lemma inv_lt_inv : a⁻¹ < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a :=
begin
cases a; cases b; simp only [some_eq_coe, none_eq_top, inv_top],
{ simp only [lt_irrefl] },
{ exact inv_pos.trans lt_top_iff_ne_top.symm },
{ simp only [not_lt_zero, not_top_lt] },
{ cases eq_or_lt_of_le (zero_le a) with ha ha;
cases eq_or_lt_of_le (zero_le b) with hb hb,
{ subst a, subst b, simp },
{ subst a, simp },
{ subst b, simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, lt_top_iff_ne_top, inv_ne_top] },
{ rw [← coe_inv (ne_of_gt ha), ← coe_inv (ne_of_gt hb), coe_lt_coe, coe_lt_coe],
simp only [nnreal.coe_lt_coe.symm] at *,
exact inv_lt_inv ha hb } }
end
lemma inv_lt_iff_inv_lt : a⁻¹ < b ↔ b⁻¹ < a :=
by simpa only [inv_inv] using @inv_lt_inv a b⁻¹
lemma lt_inv_iff_lt_inv : a < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a⁻¹ :=
by simpa only [inv_inv] using @inv_lt_inv a⁻¹ b
@[simp, priority 1100] -- higher than le_inv_iff_mul_le
lemma inv_le_inv : a⁻¹ ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a :=
by simp only [le_iff_lt_or_eq, inv_lt_inv, inv_eq_inv, eq_comm]
lemma inv_le_iff_inv_le : a⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ b⁻¹ ≤ a :=
by simpa only [inv_inv] using @inv_le_inv a b⁻¹
lemma le_inv_iff_le_inv : a ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a⁻¹ :=
by simpa only [inv_inv] using @inv_le_inv a⁻¹ b
@[simp] lemma inv_le_one : a⁻¹ ≤ 1 ↔ 1 ≤ a :=
inv_le_iff_inv_le.trans $ by rw inv_one
lemma one_le_inv : 1 ≤ a⁻¹ ↔ a ≤ 1 :=
le_inv_iff_le_inv.trans $ by rw inv_one
@[simp] lemma inv_lt_one : a⁻¹ < 1 ↔ 1 < a :=
inv_lt_iff_inv_lt.trans $ by rw [inv_one]
lemma pow_le_pow_of_le_one {n m : ℕ} (ha : a ≤ 1) (h : n ≤ m) : a ^ m ≤ a ^ n :=
begin
rw [← @inv_inv a, ← ennreal.inv_pow, ← @ennreal.inv_pow a⁻¹, inv_le_inv],
exact pow_le_pow (one_le_inv.2 ha) h
end
@[simp] lemma div_top : a / ∞ = 0 := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_top, mul_zero]
@[simp] lemma top_div_coe : ∞ / p = ∞ := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv, top_mul]
lemma top_div_of_ne_top (h : a ≠ ∞) : ∞ / a = ∞ :=
by { lift a to ℝ≥0 using h, exact top_div_coe }
lemma top_div_of_lt_top (h : a < ∞) : ∞ / a = ∞ :=
top_div_of_ne_top h.ne
lemma top_div : ∞ / a = if a = ∞ then 0 else ∞ :=
by by_cases a = ∞; simp [top_div_of_ne_top, *]
@[simp] lemma zero_div : 0 / a = 0 := zero_mul a⁻¹
lemma div_eq_top : a / b = ∞ ↔ (a ≠ 0 ∧ b = 0) ∨ (a = ∞ ∧ b ≠ ∞) :=
by simp [div_eq_mul_inv, ennreal.mul_eq_top]
lemma le_div_iff_mul_le (h0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ 0) (ht : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ ∞) :
a ≤ c / b ↔ a * b ≤ c :=
begin
cases b,
{ simp at ht,
split,
{ assume ha, simp at ha, simp [ha] },
{ contrapose,
assume ha,
simp at ha,
have : a * ∞ = ∞, by simp [ennreal.mul_eq_top, ha],
simp [this, ht] } },
by_cases hb : b ≠ 0,
{ have : (b : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ 0, by simp [hb],
rw [← ennreal.mul_le_mul_left this coe_ne_top],
suffices : ↑b * a ≤ (↑b * ↑b⁻¹) * c ↔ a * ↑b ≤ c,
{ simpa [some_eq_coe, div_eq_mul_inv, hb, mul_left_comm, mul_comm, mul_assoc] },
rw [← coe_mul, mul_inv_cancel hb, coe_one, one_mul, mul_comm] },
{ simp at hb,
simp [hb] at h0,
have : c / 0 = ∞, by simp [div_eq_top, h0],
simp [hb, this] }
end
lemma div_le_iff_le_mul (hb0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ ∞) (hbt : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ 0) : a / b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c * b :=
begin
suffices : a * b⁻¹ ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c / b⁻¹, by simpa [div_eq_mul_inv],
refine (le_div_iff_mul_le _ _).symm; simpa
end
lemma div_le_of_le_mul (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / c ≤ b :=
begin
by_cases h0 : c = 0,
{ have : a = 0, by simpa [h0] using h, simp [*] },
by_cases hinf : c = ∞, by simp [hinf],
exact (div_le_iff_le_mul (or.inl h0) (or.inl hinf)).2 h
end
protected lemma div_lt_iff (h0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ 0) (ht : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ ∞) :
c / b < a ↔ c < a * b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le $ le_div_iff_mul_le h0 ht
lemma mul_lt_of_lt_div (h : a < b / c) : a * c < b :=
by { contrapose! h, exact ennreal.div_le_of_le_mul h }
lemma inv_le_iff_le_mul : (b = ∞ → a ≠ 0) → (a = ∞ → b ≠ 0) → (a⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ 1 ≤ a * b) :=
begin
cases a; cases b; simp [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, mul_top, top_mul] {contextual := tt},
by_cases a = 0; simp [*, -coe_mul, coe_mul.symm, -coe_inv, (coe_inv _).symm, nnreal.inv_le]
end
@[simp] lemma le_inv_iff_mul_le : a ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ a * b ≤ 1 :=
begin
cases b, { by_cases a = 0; simp [*, none_eq_top, mul_top] },
by_cases b = 0; simp [*, some_eq_coe, le_div_iff_mul_le],
suffices : a ≤ 1 / b ↔ a * b ≤ 1, { simpa [div_eq_mul_inv, h] },
exact le_div_iff_mul_le (or.inl (mt coe_eq_coe.1 h)) (or.inl coe_ne_top)
end
lemma mul_inv_cancel (h0 : a ≠ 0) (ht : a ≠ ∞) : a * a⁻¹ = 1 :=
begin
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ht,
norm_cast at *,
exact mul_inv_cancel h0
end
lemma inv_mul_cancel (h0 : a ≠ 0) (ht : a ≠ ∞) : a⁻¹ * a = 1 :=
mul_comm a a⁻¹ ▸ mul_inv_cancel h0 ht
lemma mul_le_iff_le_inv {a b r : ℝ≥0∞} (hr₀ : r ≠ 0) (hr₁ : r ≠ ∞) : (r * a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ r⁻¹ * b) :=
by rw [← @ennreal.mul_le_mul_left _ a _ hr₀ hr₁, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel hr₀ hr₁, one_mul]
lemma le_of_forall_nnreal_lt {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ r : ℝ≥0, ↑r < x → ↑r ≤ y) : x ≤ y :=
begin
refine le_of_forall_ge_of_dense (λ r hr, _),
lift r to ℝ≥0 using ne_top_of_lt hr,
exact h r hr
end
lemma eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le {x : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ r : ℝ≥0, ↑r ≤ x) : x = ∞ :=
top_unique $ le_of_forall_nnreal_lt $ λ r hr, h r
lemma div_add_div_same {a b c : ℝ≥0∞} : a / c + b / c = (a + b) / c :=
eq.symm $ right_distrib a b (c⁻¹)
lemma div_self (h0 : a ≠ 0) (hI : a ≠ ∞) : a / a = 1 :=
mul_inv_cancel h0 hI
lemma mul_div_cancel (h0 : a ≠ 0) (hI : a ≠ ∞) : (b / a) * a = b :=
by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel h0 hI, mul_one]
lemma mul_div_cancel' (h0 : a ≠ 0) (hI : a ≠ ∞) : a * (b / a) = b :=
by rw [mul_comm, mul_div_cancel h0 hI]
lemma mul_div_le : a * (b / a) ≤ b :=
begin
by_cases h0 : a = 0, { simp [h0] },
by_cases hI : a = ∞, { simp [hI] },
rw mul_div_cancel' h0 hI, exact le_refl b
end
lemma inv_two_add_inv_two : (2:ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ + 2⁻¹ = 1 :=
by rw [← two_mul, ← div_eq_mul_inv, div_self two_ne_zero two_ne_top]
lemma add_halves (a : ℝ≥0∞) : a / 2 + a / 2 = a :=
by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_add, inv_two_add_inv_two, mul_one]
@[simp] lemma div_zero_iff : a / b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = ∞ :=
by simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
@[simp] lemma div_pos_iff : 0 < a / b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ ∞ :=
by simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, not_or_distrib]
lemma half_pos {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : 0 < a) : 0 < a / 2 :=
by simp [ne_of_gt h]
lemma one_half_lt_one : (2⁻¹:ℝ≥0∞) < 1 := inv_lt_one.2 $ one_lt_two
lemma half_lt_self {a : ℝ≥0∞} (hz : a ≠ 0) (ht : a ≠ ∞) : a / 2 < a :=
begin
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ht,
have h : (2 : ℝ≥0∞) = ((2 : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞), from rfl,
have h' : (2 : ℝ≥0) ≠ 0, from _root_.two_ne_zero',
rw [h, ← coe_div h', coe_lt_coe], -- `norm_cast` fails to apply `coe_div`
norm_cast at hz,
exact nnreal.half_lt_self hz
end
lemma sub_half (h : a ≠ ∞) : a - a / 2 = a / 2 :=
begin
lift a to ℝ≥0 using h,
exact sub_eq_of_add_eq (mul_ne_top coe_ne_top $ by simp) (add_halves a)
end
@[simp] lemma one_sub_inv_two : (1:ℝ≥0∞) - 2⁻¹ = 2⁻¹ :=
by simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, one_mul] using sub_half one_ne_top
lemma exists_inv_nat_lt {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a ≠ 0) :
∃n:ℕ, (n:ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ < a :=
@inv_inv a ▸ by simp only [inv_lt_inv, ennreal.exists_nat_gt (inv_ne_top.2 h)]
lemma exists_nat_pos_mul_gt (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ ∞) :
∃ n > 0, b < (n : ℕ) * a :=
begin
have : b / a ≠ ∞, from mul_ne_top hb (inv_ne_top.2 ha),
refine (ennreal.exists_nat_gt this).imp (λ n hn, _),
have : 0 < (n : ℝ≥0∞), from (zero_le _).trans_lt hn,
refine ⟨coe_nat_lt_coe_nat.1 this, _⟩,
rwa [← ennreal.div_lt_iff (or.inl ha) (or.inr hb)]
end
lemma exists_nat_mul_gt (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ ∞) :
∃ n : ℕ, b < n * a :=
(exists_nat_pos_mul_gt ha hb).imp $ λ n, Exists.snd
lemma exists_nat_pos_inv_mul_lt (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
∃ n > 0, ((n : ℕ) : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ * a < b :=
begin
rcases exists_nat_pos_mul_gt hb ha with ⟨n, npos, hn⟩,
have : (n : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ 0 := nat.cast_ne_zero.2 npos.lt.ne',
use [n, npos],
rwa [← one_mul b, ← inv_mul_cancel this coe_nat_ne_top,
mul_assoc, mul_lt_mul_left (inv_ne_zero.2 coe_nat_ne_top) (inv_ne_top.2 this)]
end
lemma exists_nnreal_pos_mul_lt (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
∃ n > 0, ↑(n : ℝ≥0) * a < b :=
begin
rcases exists_nat_pos_inv_mul_lt ha hb with ⟨n, npos : 0 < n, hn⟩,
use (n : ℝ≥0)⁻¹,
simp [*, npos.ne', zero_lt_one]
end
lemma exists_inv_two_pow_lt (ha : a ≠ 0) :
∃ n : ℕ, 2⁻¹ ^ n < a :=
begin
rcases exists_inv_nat_lt ha with ⟨n, hn⟩,
simp only [← ennreal.inv_pow],
refine ⟨n, lt_trans (inv_lt_inv.2 _) hn⟩,
norm_cast,
exact n.lt_two_pow
end
end inv
section real
lemma to_real_add (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : (a+b).to_real = a.to_real + b.to_real :=
begin
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha,
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb,
refl
end
lemma to_real_add_le : (a+b).to_real ≤ a.to_real + b.to_real :=
if ha : a = ∞ then by simp only [ha, top_add, top_to_real, zero_add, to_real_nonneg]
else if hb : b = ∞ then by simp only [hb, add_top, top_to_real, add_zero, to_real_nonneg]
else le_of_eq (to_real_add ha hb)
lemma of_real_add {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
ennreal.of_real (p + q) = ennreal.of_real p + ennreal.of_real q :=
by rw [ennreal.of_real, ennreal.of_real, ennreal.of_real, ← coe_add,
coe_eq_coe, real.to_nnreal_add hp hq]
lemma of_real_add_le {p q : ℝ} : ennreal.of_real (p + q) ≤ ennreal.of_real p + ennreal.of_real q :=
coe_le_coe.2 real.to_nnreal_add_le
@[simp] lemma to_real_le_to_real (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.to_real ≤ b.to_real ↔ a ≤ b :=
begin
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha,
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb,
norm_cast
end
lemma to_real_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a ≤ b) : a.to_real ≤ b.to_real :=
(to_real_le_to_real (h.trans_lt (lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 hb)).ne hb).2 h
@[simp] lemma to_real_lt_to_real (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.to_real < b.to_real ↔ a < b :=
begin
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha,
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb,
norm_cast
end
lemma to_real_strict_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a < b) : a.to_real < b.to_real :=
(to_real_lt_to_real (h.trans (lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 hb)).ne hb).2 h
lemma to_real_max (hr : a ≠ ∞) (hp : b ≠ ∞) :
ennreal.to_real (max a b) = max (ennreal.to_real a) (ennreal.to_real b) :=
(le_total a b).elim
(λ h, by simp only [h, (ennreal.to_real_le_to_real hr hp).2 h, max_eq_right])
(λ h, by simp only [h, (ennreal.to_real_le_to_real hp hr).2 h, max_eq_left])
lemma to_nnreal_pos_iff : 0 < a.to_nnreal ↔ (0 < a ∧ a ≠ ∞) :=
begin
cases a,
{ simp [none_eq_top] },
{ simp [some_eq_coe] }
end
lemma to_real_pos_iff : 0 < a.to_real ↔ (0 < a ∧ a ≠ ∞):=
(nnreal.coe_pos).trans to_nnreal_pos_iff
lemma of_real_le_of_real {p q : ℝ} (h : p ≤ q) : ennreal.of_real p ≤ ennreal.of_real q :=
by simp [ennreal.of_real, real.to_nnreal_le_to_nnreal h]
lemma of_real_le_of_le_to_real {a : ℝ} {b : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a ≤ ennreal.to_real b) :
ennreal.of_real a ≤ b :=
(of_real_le_of_real h).trans of_real_to_real_le
@[simp] lemma of_real_le_of_real_iff {p q : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ q) :
ennreal.of_real p ≤ ennreal.of_real q ↔ p ≤ q :=
by rw [ennreal.of_real, ennreal.of_real, coe_le_coe, real.to_nnreal_le_to_nnreal_iff h]
@[simp] lemma of_real_lt_of_real_iff {p q : ℝ} (h : 0 < q) :
ennreal.of_real p < ennreal.of_real q ↔ p < q :=
by rw [ennreal.of_real, ennreal.of_real, coe_lt_coe, real.to_nnreal_lt_to_nnreal_iff h]
lemma of_real_lt_of_real_iff_of_nonneg {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) :
ennreal.of_real p < ennreal.of_real q ↔ p < q :=
by rw [ennreal.of_real, ennreal.of_real, coe_lt_coe, real.to_nnreal_lt_to_nnreal_iff_of_nonneg hp]
@[simp] lemma of_real_pos {p : ℝ} : 0 < ennreal.of_real p ↔ 0 < p :=
by simp [ennreal.of_real]
@[simp] lemma of_real_eq_zero {p : ℝ} : ennreal.of_real p = 0 ↔ p ≤ 0 :=
by simp [ennreal.of_real]
lemma of_real_le_iff_le_to_real {a : ℝ} {b : ℝ≥0∞} (hb : b ≠ ∞) :
ennreal.of_real a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ ennreal.to_real b :=
begin
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb,
simpa [ennreal.of_real, ennreal.to_real] using real.to_nnreal_le_iff_le_coe
end
lemma of_real_lt_iff_lt_to_real {a : ℝ} {b : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : b ≠ ∞) :
ennreal.of_real a < b ↔ a < ennreal.to_real b :=
begin
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb,
simpa [ennreal.of_real, ennreal.to_real] using real.to_nnreal_lt_iff_lt_coe ha
end
lemma le_of_real_iff_to_real_le {a : ℝ≥0∞} {b : ℝ} (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
a ≤ ennreal.of_real b ↔ ennreal.to_real a ≤ b :=
begin
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha,
simpa [ennreal.of_real, ennreal.to_real] using real.le_to_nnreal_iff_coe_le hb
end
lemma to_real_le_of_le_of_real {a : ℝ≥0∞} {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 ≤ b) (h : a ≤ ennreal.of_real b) :
ennreal.to_real a ≤ b :=
have ha : a ≠ ∞, from ne_top_of_le_ne_top of_real_ne_top h,
(le_of_real_iff_to_real_le ha hb).1 h
lemma lt_of_real_iff_to_real_lt {a : ℝ≥0∞} {b : ℝ} (ha : a ≠ ∞) :
a < ennreal.of_real b ↔ ennreal.to_real a < b :=
begin
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha,
simpa [ennreal.of_real, ennreal.to_real] using real.lt_to_nnreal_iff_coe_lt
end
lemma of_real_mul {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) :
ennreal.of_real (p * q) = (ennreal.of_real p) * (ennreal.of_real q) :=
by { simp only [ennreal.of_real, coe_mul.symm, coe_eq_coe], exact real.to_nnreal_mul hp }
lemma of_real_inv_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) :
(ennreal.of_real x)⁻¹ = ennreal.of_real x⁻¹ :=
by rw [ennreal.of_real, ennreal.of_real, ←@coe_inv (real.to_nnreal x) (by simp [hx]), coe_eq_coe,
real.to_nnreal_inv.symm]
lemma of_real_div_of_pos {x y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) :
ennreal.of_real (x / y) = ennreal.of_real x / ennreal.of_real y :=
by rw [div_eq_inv_mul, div_eq_mul_inv, of_real_mul (inv_nonneg.2 hy.le), of_real_inv_of_pos hy,
mul_comm]
lemma to_real_of_real_mul (c : ℝ) (a : ℝ≥0∞) (h : 0 ≤ c) :
ennreal.to_real ((ennreal.of_real c) * a) = c * ennreal.to_real a :=
begin
cases a,
{ simp only [none_eq_top, ennreal.to_real, top_to_nnreal, nnreal.coe_zero, mul_zero, mul_top],
by_cases h' : c ≤ 0,
{ rw [if_pos], { simp }, { convert of_real_zero, exact le_antisymm h' h } },
{ rw [if_neg], refl, rw [of_real_eq_zero], assumption } },
{ simp only [ennreal.to_real, ennreal.to_nnreal],
simp only [some_eq_coe, ennreal.of_real, coe_mul.symm, to_nnreal_coe, nnreal.coe_mul],
congr, apply real.coe_to_nnreal, exact h }
end
@[simp] lemma to_nnreal_mul_top (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ennreal.to_nnreal (a * ∞) = 0 :=
begin
by_cases h : a = 0,
{ rw [h, zero_mul, zero_to_nnreal] },
{ rw [mul_top, if_neg h, top_to_nnreal] }
end
@[simp] lemma to_nnreal_top_mul (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ennreal.to_nnreal (∞ * a) = 0 :=
by rw [mul_comm, to_nnreal_mul_top]
@[simp] lemma to_real_mul_top (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ennreal.to_real (a * ∞) = 0 :=
by rw [ennreal.to_real, to_nnreal_mul_top, nnreal.coe_zero]
@[simp] lemma to_real_top_mul (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ennreal.to_real (∞ * a) = 0 :=
by { rw mul_comm, exact to_real_mul_top _ }
lemma to_real_eq_to_real (ha : a < ∞) (hb : b < ∞) :
ennreal.to_real a = ennreal.to_real b ↔ a = b :=
begin
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha.ne,
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb.ne,
simp only [coe_eq_coe, nnreal.coe_eq, coe_to_real],
end
/-- `ennreal.to_nnreal` as a `monoid_hom`. -/
def to_nnreal_hom : ℝ≥0∞ →* ℝ≥0 :=
{ to_fun := ennreal.to_nnreal,
map_one' := to_nnreal_coe,
map_mul' := by rintro (_|x) (_|y); simp only [← coe_mul, none_eq_top, some_eq_coe,
to_nnreal_top_mul, to_nnreal_mul_top, top_to_nnreal, mul_zero, zero_mul, to_nnreal_coe] }
lemma to_nnreal_mul {a b : ℝ≥0∞}: (a * b).to_nnreal = a.to_nnreal * b.to_nnreal :=
to_nnreal_hom.map_mul a b
lemma to_nnreal_pow (a : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) : (a ^ n).to_nnreal = a.to_nnreal ^ n :=
to_nnreal_hom.map_pow a n
lemma to_nnreal_prod {ι : Type*} {s : finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} :
(∏ i in s, f i).to_nnreal = ∏ i in s, (f i).to_nnreal :=
to_nnreal_hom.map_prod _ _
/-- `ennreal.to_real` as a `monoid_hom`. -/
def to_real_hom : ℝ≥0∞ →* ℝ :=
(nnreal.to_real_hom : ℝ≥0 →* ℝ).comp to_nnreal_hom
lemma to_real_mul : (a * b).to_real = a.to_real * b.to_real :=
to_real_hom.map_mul a b
lemma to_real_pow (a : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) : (a ^ n).to_real = a.to_real ^ n :=
to_real_hom.map_pow a n
lemma to_real_prod {ι : Type*} {s : finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} :
(∏ i in s, f i).to_real = ∏ i in s, (f i).to_real :=
to_real_hom.map_prod _ _
lemma of_real_prod_of_nonneg {s : finset α} {f : α → ℝ} (hf : ∀ i, i ∈ s → 0 ≤ f i) :
ennreal.of_real (∏ i in s, f i) = ∏ i in s, ennreal.of_real (f i) :=
begin
simp_rw [ennreal.of_real, ←coe_finset_prod, coe_eq_coe],
exact real.to_nnreal_prod_of_nonneg hf,
end
@[simp] lemma to_nnreal_bit0 {x : ℝ≥0∞} : (bit0 x).to_nnreal = bit0 (x.to_nnreal) :=
begin
by_cases hx_top : x = ∞,
{ simp [hx_top, bit0_eq_top_iff.mpr rfl], },
exact to_nnreal_add (lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr hx_top) (lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr hx_top),
end
@[simp] lemma to_nnreal_bit1 {x : ℝ≥0∞} (hx_top : x ≠ ∞) :
(bit1 x).to_nnreal = bit1 (x.to_nnreal) :=
by simp [bit1, bit1, to_nnreal_add
(lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr (by rwa [ne.def, bit0_eq_top_iff])) ennreal.one_lt_top]
@[simp] lemma to_real_bit0 {x : ℝ≥0∞} : (bit0 x).to_real = bit0 (x.to_real) :=
by simp [ennreal.to_real]
@[simp] lemma to_real_bit1 {x : ℝ≥0∞} (hx_top : x ≠ ∞) :
(bit1 x).to_real = bit1 (x.to_real) :=
by simp [ennreal.to_real, hx_top]
@[simp] lemma of_real_bit0 {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
ennreal.of_real (bit0 r) = bit0 (ennreal.of_real r) :=
of_real_add hr hr
@[simp] lemma of_real_bit1 {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
ennreal.of_real (bit1 r) = bit1 (ennreal.of_real r) :=
(of_real_add (by simp [hr]) zero_le_one).trans (by simp [real.to_nnreal_one, bit1, hr])
end real
section infi
variables {ι : Sort*} {f g : ι → ℝ≥0∞}
lemma infi_add : infi f + a = ⨅i, f i + a :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume i, add_le_add (infi_le _ _) $ le_refl _)
(ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add.1 $ le_infi $ assume i, ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add.2 $ infi_le _ _)
lemma supr_sub : (⨆i, f i) - a = (⨆i, f i - a) :=
le_antisymm
(ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add.2 $ supr_le $ assume i, ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add.1 $ le_supr _ i)
(supr_le $ assume i, ennreal.sub_le_sub (le_supr _ _) (le_refl a))
lemma sub_infi : a - (⨅i, f i) = (⨆i, a - f i) :=
begin
refine (eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ c, _),
rw [ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add, add_comm, infi_add],
simp [ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm],
end
lemma Inf_add {s : set ℝ≥0∞} : Inf s + a = ⨅b∈s, b + a :=
by simp [Inf_eq_infi, infi_add]
lemma add_infi {a : ℝ≥0∞} : a + infi f = ⨅b, a + f b :=
by rw [add_comm, infi_add]; simp [add_comm]
lemma infi_add_infi (h : ∀i j, ∃k, f k + g k ≤ f i + g j) : infi f + infi g = (⨅a, f a + g a) :=
suffices (⨅a, f a + g a) ≤ infi f + infi g,
from le_antisymm (le_infi $ assume a, add_le_add (infi_le _ _) (infi_le _ _)) this,
calc (⨅a, f a + g a) ≤ (⨅ a a', f a + g a') :
le_infi $ assume a, le_infi $ assume a',
let ⟨k, h⟩ := h a a' in infi_le_of_le k h
... ≤ infi f + infi g :
by simp [add_infi, infi_add, -add_comm, -le_infi_iff]; exact le_refl _
lemma infi_sum {f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : finset α} [nonempty ι]
(h : ∀(t : finset α) (i j : ι), ∃k, ∀a∈t, f k a ≤ f i a ∧ f k a ≤ f j a) :
(⨅i, ∑ a in s, f i a) = ∑ a in s, ⨅i, f i a :=
finset.induction_on s (by simp) $ assume a s ha ih,
have ∀ (i j : ι), ∃ (k : ι), f k a + ∑ b in s, f k b ≤ f i a + ∑ b in s, f j b,
from assume i j,
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := h (insert a s) i j in
⟨k, add_le_add (hk a (finset.mem_insert_self _ _)).left $ finset.sum_le_sum $
assume a ha, (hk _ $ finset.mem_insert_of_mem ha).right⟩,
by simp [ha, ih.symm, infi_add_infi this]
lemma infi_mul {ι} [nonempty ι] {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {x : ℝ≥0∞} (h : x ≠ ∞) :
infi f * x = ⨅i, f i * x :=
begin
by_cases h2 : x = 0, simp only [h2, mul_zero, infi_const],
refine le_antisymm
(le_infi $ λ i, mul_right_mono $ infi_le _ _)
((div_le_iff_le_mul (or.inl h2) $ or.inl h).mp $ le_infi $
λ i, (div_le_iff_le_mul (or.inl h2) $ or.inl h).mpr $ infi_le _ _)
end
lemma mul_infi {ι} [nonempty ι] {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {x : ℝ≥0∞} (h : x ≠ ∞) :
x * infi f = ⨅i, x * f i :=
by { rw [mul_comm, infi_mul h], simp only [mul_comm], assumption }
/-! `supr_mul`, `mul_supr` and variants are in `topology.instances.ennreal`. -/
end infi
section supr
@[simp] lemma supr_eq_zero {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} : (⨆ i, f i) = 0 ↔ ∀ i, f i = 0 :=
supr_eq_bot
@[simp] lemma supr_zero_eq_zero {ι : Sort*} : (⨆ i : ι, (0 : ℝ≥0∞)) = 0 :=
by simp
lemma sup_eq_zero {a b : ℝ≥0∞} : a ⊔ b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 := sup_eq_bot_iff
lemma supr_coe_nat : (⨆n:ℕ, (n : ℝ≥0∞)) = ∞ :=
(supr_eq_top _).2 $ assume b hb, ennreal.exists_nat_gt (lt_top_iff_ne_top.1 hb)
end supr
/-- `le_of_add_le_add_left` is normally applicable to `ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid`,
but it holds in `ℝ≥0∞` with the additional assumption that `a < ∞`. -/
lemma le_of_add_le_add_left {a b c : ℝ≥0∞} : a < ∞ →
a + b ≤ a + c → b ≤ c :=
by cases a; cases b; cases c; simp [← ennreal.coe_add, ennreal.coe_le_coe]
/-- `le_of_add_le_add_right` is normally applicable to `ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid`,
but it holds in `ℝ≥0∞` with the additional assumption that `a < ∞`. -/
lemma le_of_add_le_add_right {a b c : ℝ≥0∞} : a < ∞ →
b + a ≤ c + a → b ≤ c :=
by simpa only [add_comm _ a] using le_of_add_le_add_left
end ennreal
|
22b45b8dd4ed52cd067b170bbe4454fa2e0f580b | ec5e5a9dbe7f60fa5784d15211d8bf24ada0825c | /src/LLVMOutput.lean | 5fca24462a5814d08282c4c7838d1bf45e2ee172 | [] | no_license | pnwamk/lean-llvm | fcd9a828e52e80eb197f7d9032b3846f2e09ef74 | ebc3bca9a57a6aef29529d46394f560398fb5c9c | refs/heads/master | 1,668,418,078,706 | 1,593,548,643,000 | 1,593,548,643,000 | 258,617,753 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,587,760,298,000 | 1,587,760,298,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,789 | lean | import Init.Data.Array
import Init.Data.Int
import Init.Data.RBMap
import Init.System.IO
import LeanLLVM.AST
import LeanLLVM.PP
import LeanLLVM.DataLayout
import LeanLLVM.LLVMCodes
import LeanLLVM.LLVMFFI
namespace LLVM
namespace Output
@[reducible]
def SymMap := RBMap Symbol FFI.Value (λx y => decide (x < y))
@[reducible]
def BlockMap := RBMap BlockLabel FFI.Value (λx y => decide (x.label < y.label))
@[reducible]
def ValueMap := RBMap Ident FFI.Value (λx y => decide (x < y))
@[reducible]
def TypeMap := RBMap String FFI.Type_ (λx y => decide (x < y))
structure ValueContext :=
(symbolMap : SymMap)
(blockMap : BlockMap)
(valueMap : ValueMap)
(typeMap : TypeMap)
def ValueContext.init : ValueContext :=
{ symbolMap := RBMap.empty,
blockMap := RBMap.empty,
valueMap := RBMap.empty,
typeMap := RBMap.empty
}
end Output
@[reducible]
def Output (a:Type) := IO.Ref Output.ValueContext → IO a.
namespace Output
instance monad : Monad Output :=
{ bind := λa b mx mf r => mx r >>= λx => mf x r
, pure := λa x r => pure x
}
instance monadExcept : MonadExcept IO.Error Output :=
{ throw := λa err r => throw err,
catch := λa m handle r => catch (m r) (λerr => handle err r),
}
instance mIO : MonadIO Output :=
{ monadLift := λa m r => m
}
def run {a:Type} (m:Output a) : IO (Output.ValueContext × a) := do
r <- IO.mkRef Output.ValueContext.init;
a <- m r;
vc <- r.get;
pure (vc, a)
def alterSymbolMap (f:SymMap → SymMap) : Output Unit := λr =>
r.modify (λvc => { vc with symbolMap := f vc.symbolMap })
def lookupAlias (nm:String) : Output (Option FFI.Type_) := λr => do
vc <- r.get;
pure (vc.typeMap.find? nm)
/-
def createFunction (m:Module) (nm:symbol) : Output LLVMFunction :=
do f <- newFunction m nm.symbol;
alterSymbolMap (λsm => sm.insert
-/
end Output
def outputFloatType : FloatType → Code.TypeID
| FloatType.half => Code.TypeID.half
| FloatType.float => Code.TypeID.float
| FloatType.double => Code.TypeID.double
| FloatType.fp128 => Code.TypeID.fp128
| FloatType.x86FP80 => Code.TypeID.x86FP80
| FloatType.ppcFP128 => Code.TypeID.ppcFP128
def outputPrimType (ctx:FFI.Context) : PrimType → IO FFI.Type_
| PrimType.label => FFI.newPrimitiveType ctx Code.TypeID.label
| PrimType.token => FFI.newPrimitiveType ctx Code.TypeID.token
| PrimType.void => FFI.newPrimitiveType ctx Code.TypeID.void
| PrimType.floatType ft => FFI.newPrimitiveType ctx (outputFloatType ft)
| PrimType.x86mmx => FFI.newPrimitiveType ctx Code.TypeID.x86mmx
| PrimType.metadata => FFI.newPrimitiveType ctx Code.TypeID.metadata
| PrimType.integer n => FFI.newIntegerType ctx n
partial def outputType (ctx:FFI.Context) : LLVMType → Output FFI.Type_
| LLVMType.prim pt => monadLift (outputPrimType ctx pt)
| LLVMType.alias nm => do
x <- Output.lookupAlias nm;
match x with
| some tp => pure tp
| none => throw (IO.userError ("Unknown type alias: " ++ nm))
| LLVMType.array n t => do
t' <- outputType t;
monadLift $ FFI.newArrayType n t'
| LLVMType.vector n t => do
t' <- outputType t;
monadLift $ FFI.newVectorType n t'
| LLVMType.ptr t => do
t' <- outputType t;
monadLift $ FFI.newPointerType t'
| LLVMType.funType ret args varargs => do
ret' <- outputType ret;
args' <- Array.mapM outputType args;
monadLift $ FFI.newFunctionType ret' args' varargs
| LLVMType.struct packed tps => do
tps' <- tps.mapM outputType;
monadLift $ FFI.newLiteralStructType packed tps'
def setupTypeAlias (ctx:FFI.Context) (nm:String) : Output FFI.Type_ := λr => do
vc <- r.get;
tp <- FFI.newOpaqueStructType ctx nm;
let vc' := { vc with typeMap := vc.typeMap.insert nm tp };
r.set vc';
pure tp
def finalizeTypeAlias (ctx:FFI.Context) (ty:FFI.Type_) : TypeDeclBody → Output Unit
| TypeDeclBody.opaque => pure ()
| TypeDeclBody.defn (LLVMType.struct packed tps) => do
tps' <- tps.mapM (outputType ctx);
monadLift (FFI.setStructTypeBody ty packed tps');
pure ()
| TypeDeclBody.defn _ =>
throw (IO.userError "type alias defintion must be a struct body")
-- Process type aliases in two phases. First, allocate named, opaque struct
-- types for each alias and record them in the value context. Next, process
-- the bodies of type aliases and set the body of the non-opaque named struct types.
--
-- This two-phase approach ensures that recursive struct groups are properly handled.
def outputTypeAliases (ctx:FFI.Context) (tds:Array TypeDecl) : Output Unit := do
fs <- tds.mapM (λtd =>
setupTypeAlias ctx td.name >>= λty => pure (finalizeTypeAlias ctx ty td.decl));
Array.iterateM fs () (λ_ action _ => action)
def outputDeclare (ctx:FFI.Context) (m:FFI.Module) (d:Declare) : Output Unit := do
funtp <- outputType ctx (LLVMType.funType d.retType d.args d.varArgs);
f <- monadLift (FFI.newFunction m funtp d.name.symbol);
Output.alterSymbolMap (λsm => sm.insert d.name (FFI.functionToValue f))
def outputDefine (ctx:FFI.Context) (m:FFI.Module) (d:Define) : Output Unit := do
let argTypes := d.args.map (λa => a.type);
funtp <- outputType ctx (LLVMType.funType d.retType argTypes d.varArgs);
f <- monadLift (FFI.newFunction m funtp d.name.symbol);
Output.alterSymbolMap (λsm => sm.insert d.name (FFI.functionToValue f));
-- TODO!!!
pure ()
def outputModule (ctx:FFI.Context) (m:Module) : Output FFI.Module := do
outputTypeAliases ctx m.types;
let modnm := match m.sourceName with
| some nm => nm
| none => "";
ffimod <- monadLift (FFI.newModule ctx modnm);
Array.iterateM m.declares () (λ_ decl _ => outputDeclare ctx ffimod decl);
Array.iterateM m.defines () (λ_ defn _ => outputDefine ctx ffimod defn);
pure ffimod
end LLVM
|
458e01fe00cde993b2eaf59c9f86d80423eae811 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/topology/algebra/floor_ring_auto.lean | ec5fe3b7a2cd855f67a3a043d1521b485af40f40 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,734 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker
Basic topological facts (limits and continuity) about `floor`,
`ceil` and `fract` in a `floor_ring`.
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.topology.algebra.ordered
import Mathlib.algebra.floor
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes u_1 u_2 u_3
namespace Mathlib
theorem tendsto_floor_at_top {α : Type u_1} [linear_ordered_ring α] [floor_ring α] :
filter.tendsto floor filter.at_top filter.at_top :=
sorry
theorem tendsto_floor_at_bot {α : Type u_1} [linear_ordered_ring α] [floor_ring α] :
filter.tendsto floor filter.at_bot filter.at_bot :=
monotone.tendsto_at_bot_at_bot (fun (a b : α) (hab : a ≤ b) => floor_mono hab)
fun (b : ℤ) =>
Exists.intro (↑b)
(eq.mpr (id (Eq._oldrec (Eq.refl (floor ↑b ≤ b)) (floor_coe b))) (le_refl b))
theorem tendsto_ceil_at_top {α : Type u_1} [linear_ordered_ring α] [floor_ring α] :
filter.tendsto ceil filter.at_top filter.at_top :=
filter.tendsto.comp filter.tendsto_neg_at_bot_at_top
(filter.tendsto.comp tendsto_floor_at_bot filter.tendsto_neg_at_top_at_bot)
theorem tendsto_ceil_at_bot {α : Type u_1} [linear_ordered_ring α] [floor_ring α] :
filter.tendsto ceil filter.at_bot filter.at_bot :=
filter.tendsto.comp filter.tendsto_neg_at_top_at_bot
(filter.tendsto.comp tendsto_floor_at_top filter.tendsto_neg_at_bot_at_top)
theorem continuous_on_floor {α : Type u_1} [linear_ordered_ring α] [floor_ring α]
[topological_space α] (n : ℤ) :
continuous_on (fun (x : α) => ↑(floor x)) (set.Ico (↑n) (↑n + 1)) :=
iff.mpr (continuous_on_congr (floor_eq_on_Ico' n)) continuous_on_const
theorem continuous_on_ceil {α : Type u_1} [linear_ordered_ring α] [floor_ring α]
[topological_space α] (n : ℤ) :
continuous_on (fun (x : α) => ↑(ceil x)) (set.Ioc (↑n - 1) ↑n) :=
iff.mpr (continuous_on_congr (ceil_eq_on_Ioc' n)) continuous_on_const
theorem tendsto_floor_right' {α : Type u_1} [linear_ordered_ring α] [floor_ring α]
[topological_space α] [order_closed_topology α] (n : ℤ) :
filter.tendsto (fun (x : α) => ↑(floor x)) (nhds_within (↑n) (set.Ici ↑n)) (nhds ↑n) :=
sorry
theorem tendsto_ceil_left' {α : Type u_1} [linear_ordered_ring α] [floor_ring α]
[topological_space α] [order_closed_topology α] (n : ℤ) :
filter.tendsto (fun (x : α) => ↑(ceil x)) (nhds_within (↑n) (set.Iic ↑n)) (nhds ↑n) :=
sorry
theorem tendsto_floor_right {α : Type u_1} [linear_ordered_ring α] [floor_ring α]
[topological_space α] [order_closed_topology α] (n : ℤ) :
filter.tendsto (fun (x : α) => ↑(floor x)) (nhds_within (↑n) (set.Ici ↑n))
(nhds_within (↑n) (set.Ici ↑n)) :=
sorry
theorem tendsto_ceil_left {α : Type u_1} [linear_ordered_ring α] [floor_ring α]
[topological_space α] [order_closed_topology α] (n : ℤ) :
filter.tendsto (fun (x : α) => ↑(ceil x)) (nhds_within (↑n) (set.Iic ↑n))
(nhds_within (↑n) (set.Iic ↑n)) :=
sorry
theorem tendsto_floor_left {α : Type u_1} [linear_ordered_ring α] [floor_ring α]
[topological_space α] [order_closed_topology α] (n : ℤ) :
filter.tendsto (fun (x : α) => ↑(floor x)) (nhds_within (↑n) (set.Iio ↑n))
(nhds_within (↑n - 1) (set.Iic (↑n - 1))) :=
sorry
theorem tendsto_ceil_right {α : Type u_1} [linear_ordered_ring α] [floor_ring α]
[topological_space α] [order_closed_topology α] (n : ℤ) :
filter.tendsto (fun (x : α) => ↑(ceil x)) (nhds_within (↑n) (set.Ioi ↑n))
(nhds_within (↑n + 1) (set.Ici (↑n + 1))) :=
sorry
theorem tendsto_floor_left' {α : Type u_1} [linear_ordered_ring α] [floor_ring α]
[topological_space α] [order_closed_topology α] (n : ℤ) :
filter.tendsto (fun (x : α) => ↑(floor x)) (nhds_within (↑n) (set.Iio ↑n)) (nhds (↑n - 1)) :=
sorry
theorem tendsto_ceil_right' {α : Type u_1} [linear_ordered_ring α] [floor_ring α]
[topological_space α] [order_closed_topology α] (n : ℤ) :
filter.tendsto (fun (x : α) => ↑(ceil x)) (nhds_within (↑n) (set.Ioi ↑n)) (nhds (↑n + 1)) :=
sorry
theorem continuous_on_fract {α : Type u_1} [linear_ordered_ring α] [floor_ring α]
[topological_space α] [topological_add_group α] (n : ℤ) :
continuous_on fract (set.Ico (↑n) (↑n + 1)) :=
continuous_on.sub continuous_on_id (continuous_on_floor n)
theorem tendsto_fract_left' {α : Type u_1} [linear_ordered_ring α] [floor_ring α]
[topological_space α] [order_closed_topology α] [topological_add_group α] (n : ℤ) :
filter.tendsto fract (nhds_within (↑n) (set.Iio ↑n)) (nhds 1) :=
sorry
theorem tendsto_fract_left {α : Type u_1} [linear_ordered_ring α] [floor_ring α]
[topological_space α] [order_closed_topology α] [topological_add_group α] (n : ℤ) :
filter.tendsto fract (nhds_within (↑n) (set.Iio ↑n)) (nhds_within 1 (set.Iio 1)) :=
tendsto_nhds_within_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within fract (tendsto_fract_left' n)
(filter.eventually_of_forall fract_lt_one)
theorem tendsto_fract_right' {α : Type u_1} [linear_ordered_ring α] [floor_ring α]
[topological_space α] [order_closed_topology α] [topological_add_group α] (n : ℤ) :
filter.tendsto fract (nhds_within (↑n) (set.Ici ↑n)) (nhds 0) :=
sorry
theorem tendsto_fract_right {α : Type u_1} [linear_ordered_ring α] [floor_ring α]
[topological_space α] [order_closed_topology α] [topological_add_group α] (n : ℤ) :
filter.tendsto fract (nhds_within (↑n) (set.Ici ↑n)) (nhds_within 0 (set.Ici 0)) :=
tendsto_nhds_within_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within fract (tendsto_fract_right' n)
(filter.eventually_of_forall fract_nonneg)
theorem continuous_on.comp_fract' {α : Type u_1} [linear_ordered_ring α] [floor_ring α]
[topological_space α] {β : Type u_2} {γ : Type u_3} [order_topology α] [topological_add_group α]
[topological_space β] [topological_space γ] {f : β → α → γ}
(h : continuous_on (function.uncurry f) (set.prod set.univ (set.Icc 0 1)))
(hf : ∀ (s : β), f s 0 = f s 1) :
continuous fun (st : β × α) => f (prod.fst st) (fract (prod.snd st)) :=
sorry
theorem continuous_on.comp_fract {α : Type u_1} [linear_ordered_ring α] [floor_ring α]
[topological_space α] {β : Type u_2} [order_topology α] [topological_add_group α]
[topological_space β] {f : α → β} (h : continuous_on f (set.Icc 0 1)) (hf : f 0 = f 1) :
continuous (f ∘ fract) :=
sorry
end Mathlib |
f01caca4d6ec3aee0675b27cd9ba6ccd64930ee2 | 302c785c90d40ad3d6be43d33bc6a558354cc2cf | /src/analysis/special_functions/pow.lean | 83b13ad9b09af920ec8bc8751dd85dbeb2abcab0 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ilitzroth/mathlib | ea647e67f1fdfd19a0f7bdc5504e8acec6180011 | 5254ef14e3465f6504306132fe3ba9cec9ffff16 | refs/heads/master | 1,680,086,661,182 | 1,617,715,647,000 | 1,617,715,647,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 69,661 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne
-/
import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric
import analysis.calculus.extend_deriv
/-!
# Power function on `ℂ`, `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0`, and `ℝ≥0∞`
We construct the power functions `x ^ y` where
* `x` and `y` are complex numbers,
* or `x` and `y` are real numbers,
* or `x` is a nonnegative real number and `y` is a real number;
* or `x` is a number from `[0, +∞]` (a.k.a. `ℝ≥0∞`) and `y` is a real number.
We also prove basic properties of these functions.
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical real topological_space nnreal ennreal filter
open filter
namespace complex
/-- The complex power function `x^y`, given by `x^y = exp(y log x)` (where `log` is the principal
determination of the logarithm), unless `x = 0` where one sets `0^0 = 1` and `0^y = 0` for
`y ≠ 0`. -/
noncomputable def cpow (x y : ℂ) : ℂ :=
if x = 0
then if y = 0
then 1
else 0
else exp (log x * y)
noncomputable instance : has_pow ℂ ℂ := ⟨cpow⟩
@[simp] lemma cpow_eq_pow (x y : ℂ) : cpow x y = x ^ y := rfl
lemma cpow_def (x y : ℂ) : x ^ y =
if x = 0
then if y = 0
then 1
else 0
else exp (log x * y) := rfl
lemma cpow_def_of_ne_zero {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℂ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) := if_neg hx
@[simp] lemma cpow_zero (x : ℂ) : x ^ (0 : ℂ) = 1 := by simp [cpow_def]
@[simp] lemma cpow_eq_zero_iff (x y : ℂ) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 :=
by { simp only [cpow_def], split_ifs; simp [*, exp_ne_zero] }
@[simp] lemma zero_cpow {x : ℂ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℂ) ^ x = 0 :=
by simp [cpow_def, *]
@[simp] lemma cpow_one (x : ℂ) : x ^ (1 : ℂ) = x :=
if hx : x = 0 then by simp [hx, cpow_def]
else by rw [cpow_def, if_neg (one_ne_zero : (1 : ℂ) ≠ 0), if_neg hx, mul_one, exp_log hx]
@[simp] lemma one_cpow (x : ℂ) : (1 : ℂ) ^ x = 1 :=
by rw cpow_def; split_ifs; simp [one_ne_zero, *] at *
lemma cpow_add {x : ℂ} (y z : ℂ) (hx : x ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
by simp [cpow_def]; split_ifs; simp [*, exp_add, mul_add] at *
lemma cpow_mul {x y : ℂ} (z : ℂ) (h₁ : -π < (log x * y).im) (h₂ : (log x * y).im ≤ π) :
x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z :=
begin
simp only [cpow_def],
split_ifs;
simp [*, exp_ne_zero, log_exp h₁ h₂, mul_assoc] at *
end
lemma cpow_neg (x y : ℂ) : x ^ -y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
by simp [cpow_def]; split_ifs; simp [exp_neg]
lemma cpow_sub {x : ℂ} (y z : ℂ) (hx : x ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, cpow_add _ _ hx, cpow_neg, div_eq_mul_inv]
lemma cpow_neg_one (x : ℂ) : x ^ (-1 : ℂ) = x⁻¹ :=
by simpa using cpow_neg x 1
@[simp] lemma cpow_nat_cast (x : ℂ) : ∀ (n : ℕ), x ^ (n : ℂ) = x ^ n
| 0 := by simp
| (n + 1) := if hx : x = 0 then by simp only [hx, pow_succ,
complex.zero_cpow (nat.cast_ne_zero.2 (nat.succ_ne_zero _)), zero_mul]
else by simp [cpow_add, hx, pow_add, cpow_nat_cast n]
@[simp] lemma cpow_int_cast (x : ℂ) : ∀ (n : ℤ), x ^ (n : ℂ) = x ^ n
| (n : ℕ) := by simp; refl
| -[1+ n] := by rw fpow_neg_succ_of_nat;
simp only [int.neg_succ_of_nat_coe, int.cast_neg, complex.cpow_neg, inv_eq_one_div,
int.cast_coe_nat, cpow_nat_cast]
lemma cpow_nat_inv_pow (x : ℂ) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) : (x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℂ)) ^ n = x :=
begin
suffices : im (log x * n⁻¹) ∈ set.Ioc (-π) π,
{ rw [← cpow_nat_cast, ← cpow_mul _ this.1 this.2, inv_mul_cancel, cpow_one],
exact_mod_cast hn.ne' },
rw [mul_comm, ← of_real_nat_cast, ← of_real_inv, of_real_mul_im, ← div_eq_inv_mul],
have hn' : 0 < (n : ℝ), by assumption_mod_cast,
have hn1 : 1 ≤ (n : ℝ), by exact_mod_cast (nat.succ_le_iff.2 hn),
split,
{ rw lt_div_iff hn',
calc -π * n ≤ -π * 1 : mul_le_mul_of_nonpos_left hn1 (neg_nonpos.2 real.pi_pos.le)
... = -π : mul_one _
... < im (log x) : neg_pi_lt_log_im _ },
{ rw div_le_iff hn',
calc im (log x) ≤ π : log_im_le_pi _
... = π * 1 : (mul_one π).symm
... ≤ π * n : mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hn1 real.pi_pos.le }
end
lemma has_strict_fderiv_at_cpow {p : ℂ × ℂ} (hp : 0 < p.1.re ∨ p.1.im ≠ 0) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ x : ℂ × ℂ, x.1 ^ x.2)
((p.2 * p.1 ^ (p.2 - 1)) • continuous_linear_map.fst ℂ ℂ ℂ +
(p.1 ^ p.2 * log p.1) • continuous_linear_map.snd ℂ ℂ ℂ) p :=
begin
have A : p.1 ≠ 0, by { intro h, simpa [h, lt_irrefl] using hp },
have : (λ x : ℂ × ℂ, x.1 ^ x.2) =ᶠ[𝓝 p] (λ x, exp (log x.1 * x.2)),
from ((is_open_ne.preimage continuous_fst).eventually_mem A).mono
(λ p hp, cpow_def_of_ne_zero hp _),
rw [cpow_sub _ _ A, cpow_one, mul_div_comm, mul_smul, mul_smul, ← smul_add],
refine has_strict_fderiv_at.congr_of_eventually_eq _ this.symm,
simpa only [cpow_def_of_ne_zero A, div_eq_mul_inv, smul_smul, add_comm]
using ((has_strict_fderiv_at_fst.clog hp).mul has_strict_fderiv_at_snd).cexp
end
lemma has_strict_deriv_at_const_cpow {x y : ℂ} (h : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0) :
has_strict_deriv_at (λ y, x ^ y) (x ^ y * log x) y :=
begin
rcases em (x = 0) with rfl|hx,
{ replace h := h.neg_resolve_left rfl,
rw [log_zero, mul_zero],
refine (has_strict_deriv_at_const _ 0).congr_of_eventually_eq _,
exact (is_open_ne.eventually_mem h).mono (λ y hy, (zero_cpow hy).symm) },
{ simpa only [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hx, mul_one]
using ((has_strict_deriv_at_id y).const_mul (log x)).cexp }
end
lemma has_fderiv_at_cpow {p : ℂ × ℂ} (hp : 0 < p.1.re ∨ p.1.im ≠ 0) :
has_fderiv_at (λ x : ℂ × ℂ, x.1 ^ x.2)
((p.2 * p.1 ^ (p.2 - 1)) • continuous_linear_map.fst ℂ ℂ ℂ +
(p.1 ^ p.2 * log p.1) • continuous_linear_map.snd ℂ ℂ ℂ) p :=
(has_strict_fderiv_at_cpow hp).has_fderiv_at
instance : has_measurable_pow ℂ ℂ :=
⟨measurable.ite (measurable_fst (measurable_set_singleton 0))
(measurable.ite (measurable_snd (measurable_set_singleton 0)) measurable_one measurable_zero)
(measurable_fst.clog.mul measurable_snd).cexp⟩
end complex
section lim
open complex
variables {α : Type*}
lemma filter.tendsto.cpow {l : filter α} {f g : α → ℂ} {a b : ℂ} (hf : tendsto f l (𝓝 a))
(hg : tendsto g l (𝓝 b)) (ha : 0 < a.re ∨ a.im ≠ 0) :
tendsto (λ x, f x ^ g x) l (𝓝 (a ^ b)) :=
(@has_fderiv_at_cpow (a, b) ha).continuous_at.tendsto.comp (hf.prod_mk_nhds hg)
lemma filter.tendsto.const_cpow {l : filter α} {f : α → ℂ} {a b : ℂ} (hf : tendsto f l (𝓝 b))
(h : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ 0) :
tendsto (λ x, a ^ f x) l (𝓝 (a ^ b)) :=
(has_strict_deriv_at_const_cpow h).continuous_at.tendsto.comp hf
variables [topological_space α] {f g : α → ℂ} {s : set α} {a : α}
lemma continuous_within_at.cpow (hf : continuous_within_at f s a) (hg : continuous_within_at g s a)
(h0 : 0 < (f a).re ∨ (f a).im ≠ 0) :
continuous_within_at (λ x, f x ^ g x) s a :=
hf.cpow hg h0
lemma continuous_within_at.const_cpow {b : ℂ} (hf : continuous_within_at f s a)
(h : b ≠ 0 ∨ f a ≠ 0) :
continuous_within_at (λ x, b ^ f x) s a :=
hf.const_cpow h
lemma continuous_at.cpow (hf : continuous_at f a) (hg : continuous_at g a)
(h0 : 0 < (f a).re ∨ (f a).im ≠ 0) :
continuous_at (λ x, f x ^ g x) a :=
hf.cpow hg h0
lemma continuous_at.const_cpow {b : ℂ} (hf : continuous_at f a) (h : b ≠ 0 ∨ f a ≠ 0) :
continuous_at (λ x, b ^ f x) a :=
hf.const_cpow h
lemma continuous_on.cpow (hf : continuous_on f s) (hg : continuous_on g s)
(h0 : ∀ a ∈ s, 0 < (f a).re ∨ (f a).im ≠ 0) :
continuous_on (λ x, f x ^ g x) s :=
λ a ha, (hf a ha).cpow (hg a ha) (h0 a ha)
lemma continuous_on.const_cpow {b : ℂ} (hf : continuous_on f s) (h : b ≠ 0 ∨ ∀ a ∈ s, f a ≠ 0) :
continuous_on (λ x, b ^ f x) s :=
λ a ha, (hf a ha).const_cpow (h.imp id $ λ h, h a ha)
lemma continuous.cpow (hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g)
(h0 : ∀ a, 0 < (f a).re ∨ (f a).im ≠ 0) :
continuous (λ x, f x ^ g x) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ λ a, (hf.continuous_at.cpow hg.continuous_at (h0 a))
lemma continuous.const_cpow {b : ℂ} (hf : continuous f) (h : b ≠ 0 ∨ ∀ a, f a ≠ 0) :
continuous (λ x, b ^ f x) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ λ a, (hf.continuous_at.const_cpow $ h.imp id $ λ h, h a)
end lim
section fderiv
open complex
variables {E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space ℂ E] {f g : E → ℂ} {f' g' : E →L[ℂ] ℂ}
{x : E} {s : set E} {c : ℂ}
lemma has_strict_fderiv_at.cpow (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x)
(hg : has_strict_fderiv_at g g' x) (h0 : 0 < (f x).re ∨ (f x).im ≠ 0) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ x, f x ^ g x)
((g x * f x ^ (g x - 1)) • f' + (f x ^ g x * log (f x)) • g') x :=
by convert (@has_strict_fderiv_at_cpow ((λ x, (f x, g x)) x) h0).comp x (hf.prod hg)
lemma has_strict_fderiv_at.const_cpow (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ x, c ^ f x) ((c ^ f x * log c) • f') x :=
(has_strict_deriv_at_const_cpow h0).comp_has_strict_fderiv_at x hf
lemma has_fderiv_at.cpow (hf : has_fderiv_at f f' x) (hg : has_fderiv_at g g' x)
(h0 : 0 < (f x).re ∨ (f x).im ≠ 0) :
has_fderiv_at (λ x, f x ^ g x)
((g x * f x ^ (g x - 1)) • f' + (f x ^ g x * log (f x)) • g') x :=
by convert (@complex.has_fderiv_at_cpow ((λ x, (f x, g x)) x) h0).comp x (hf.prod hg)
lemma has_fderiv_at.const_cpow (hf : has_fderiv_at f f' x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
has_fderiv_at (λ x, c ^ f x) ((c ^ f x * log c) • f') x :=
(has_strict_deriv_at_const_cpow h0).has_deriv_at.comp_has_fderiv_at x hf
lemma has_fderiv_within_at.cpow (hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x)
(hg : has_fderiv_within_at g g' s x) (h0 : 0 < (f x).re ∨ (f x).im ≠ 0) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ x, f x ^ g x)
((g x * f x ^ (g x - 1)) • f' + (f x ^ g x * log (f x)) • g') s x :=
by convert (@complex.has_fderiv_at_cpow ((λ x, (f x, g x)) x) h0).comp_has_fderiv_within_at x
(hf.prod hg)
lemma has_fderiv_within_at.const_cpow (hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ x, c ^ f x) ((c ^ f x * log c) • f') s x :=
(has_strict_deriv_at_const_cpow h0).has_deriv_at.comp_has_fderiv_within_at x hf
lemma differentiable_at.cpow (hf : differentiable_at ℂ f x) (hg : differentiable_at ℂ g x)
(h0 : 0 < (f x).re ∨ (f x).im ≠ 0) :
differentiable_at ℂ (λ x, f x ^ g x) x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_at.cpow hg.has_fderiv_at h0).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_at.const_cpow (hf : differentiable_at ℂ f x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
differentiable_at ℂ (λ x, c ^ f x) x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_at.const_cpow h0).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_within_at.cpow (hf : differentiable_within_at ℂ f s x)
(hg : differentiable_within_at ℂ g s x) (h0 : 0 < (f x).re ∨ (f x).im ≠ 0) :
differentiable_within_at ℂ (λ x, f x ^ g x) s x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_within_at.cpow hg.has_fderiv_within_at h0).differentiable_within_at
lemma differentiable_within_at.const_cpow (hf : differentiable_within_at ℂ f s x)
(h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
differentiable_within_at ℂ (λ x, c ^ f x) s x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_within_at.const_cpow h0).differentiable_within_at
end fderiv
section deriv
open complex
variables {f g : ℂ → ℂ} {s : set ℂ} {f' g' x c : ℂ}
/-- A private lemma that rewrites the output of lemmas like `has_fderiv_at.cpow` to the form
expected by lemmas like `has_deriv_at.cpow`. -/
private lemma aux :
((g x * f x ^ (g x - 1)) • (1 : ℂ →L[ℂ] ℂ).smul_right f' +
(f x ^ g x * log (f x)) • (1 : ℂ →L[ℂ] ℂ).smul_right g') 1 =
g x * f x ^ (g x - 1) * f' + f x ^ g x * log (f x) * g' :=
by simp only [algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, one_mul, continuous_linear_map.one_apply,
continuous_linear_map.smul_right_apply, continuous_linear_map.add_apply, pi.smul_apply,
continuous_linear_map.coe_smul']
lemma has_strict_deriv_at.cpow (hf : has_strict_deriv_at f f' x) (hg : has_strict_deriv_at g g' x)
(h0 : 0 < (f x).re ∨ (f x).im ≠ 0) :
has_strict_deriv_at (λ x, f x ^ g x)
(g x * f x ^ (g x - 1) * f' + f x ^ g x * log (f x) * g') x :=
by simpa only [aux] using (hf.cpow hg h0).has_strict_deriv_at
lemma has_strict_deriv_at.const_cpow (hf : has_strict_deriv_at f f' x) (h : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
has_strict_deriv_at (λ x, c ^ f x) (c ^ f x * log c * f') x :=
(has_strict_deriv_at_const_cpow h).comp x hf
lemma complex.has_strict_deriv_at_cpow_const (h : 0 < x.re ∨ x.im ≠ 0) :
has_strict_deriv_at (λ z : ℂ, z ^ c) (c * x ^ (c - 1)) x :=
by simpa only [mul_zero, add_zero, mul_one]
using (has_strict_deriv_at_id x).cpow (has_strict_deriv_at_const x c) h
lemma has_strict_deriv_at.cpow_const (hf : has_strict_deriv_at f f' x)
(h0 : 0 < (f x).re ∨ (f x).im ≠ 0) :
has_strict_deriv_at (λ x, f x ^ c) (c * f x ^ (c - 1) * f') x :=
(complex.has_strict_deriv_at_cpow_const h0).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_at.cpow (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) (hg : has_deriv_at g g' x)
(h0 : 0 < (f x).re ∨ (f x).im ≠ 0) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, f x ^ g x) (g x * f x ^ (g x - 1) * f' + f x ^ g x * log (f x) * g') x :=
by simpa only [aux] using (hf.has_fderiv_at.cpow hg h0).has_deriv_at
lemma has_deriv_at.const_cpow (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, c ^ f x) (c ^ f x * log c * f') x :=
(has_strict_deriv_at_const_cpow h0).has_deriv_at.comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_at.cpow_const (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) (h0 : 0 < (f x).re ∨ (f x).im ≠ 0) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, f x ^ c) (c * f x ^ (c - 1) * f') x :=
(complex.has_strict_deriv_at_cpow_const h0).has_deriv_at.comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_within_at.cpow (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x)
(hg : has_deriv_within_at g g' s x) (h0 : 0 < (f x).re ∨ (f x).im ≠ 0) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, f x ^ g x)
(g x * f x ^ (g x - 1) * f' + f x ^ g x * log (f x) * g') s x :=
by simpa only [aux] using (hf.has_fderiv_within_at.cpow hg h0).has_deriv_within_at
lemma has_deriv_within_at.const_cpow (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, c ^ f x) (c ^ f x * log c * f') s x :=
(has_strict_deriv_at_const_cpow h0).has_deriv_at.comp_has_deriv_within_at x hf
lemma has_deriv_within_at.cpow_const (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x)
(h0 : 0 < (f x).re ∨ (f x).im ≠ 0) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, f x ^ c) (c * f x ^ (c - 1) * f') s x :=
(complex.has_strict_deriv_at_cpow_const h0).has_deriv_at.comp_has_deriv_within_at x hf
end deriv
namespace real
/-- The real power function `x^y`, defined as the real part of the complex power function.
For `x > 0`, it is equal to `exp(y log x)`. For `x = 0`, one sets `0^0=1` and `0^y=0` for `y ≠ 0`.
For `x < 0`, the definition is somewhat arbitary as it depends on the choice of a complex
determination of the logarithm. With our conventions, it is equal to `exp (y log x) cos (πy)`. -/
noncomputable def rpow (x y : ℝ) := ((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re
noncomputable instance : has_pow ℝ ℝ := ⟨rpow⟩
@[simp] lemma rpow_eq_pow (x y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y := rfl
lemma rpow_def (x y : ℝ) : x ^ y = ((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re := rfl
lemma rpow_def_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y =
if x = 0
then if y = 0
then 1
else 0
else exp (log x * y) :=
by simp only [rpow_def, complex.cpow_def];
split_ifs;
simp [*, (complex.of_real_log hx).symm, -complex.of_real_mul, -is_R_or_C.of_real_mul,
(complex.of_real_mul _ _).symm, complex.exp_of_real_re] at *
lemma rpow_def_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) :=
by rw [rpow_def_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hx), if_neg (ne_of_gt hx)]
lemma exp_mul (x y : ℝ) : exp (x * y) = (exp x) ^ y :=
by rw [rpow_def_of_pos (exp_pos _), log_exp]
lemma rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 :=
by { simp only [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx], split_ifs; simp [*, exp_ne_zero] }
open_locale real
lemma rpow_def_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) * cos (y * π) :=
begin
rw [rpow_def, complex.cpow_def, if_neg],
have : complex.log x * y = ↑(log(-x) * y) + ↑(y * π) * complex.I,
{ simp only [complex.log, abs_of_neg hx, complex.arg_of_real_of_neg hx,
complex.abs_of_real, complex.of_real_mul], ring },
{ rw [this, complex.exp_add_mul_I, ← complex.of_real_exp, ← complex.of_real_cos,
← complex.of_real_sin, mul_add, ← complex.of_real_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← complex.of_real_mul,
complex.add_re, complex.of_real_re, complex.mul_re, complex.I_re, complex.of_real_im,
real.log_neg_eq_log],
ring },
{ rw complex.of_real_eq_zero, exact ne_of_lt hx }
end
lemma rpow_def_of_nonpos {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y =
if x = 0
then if y = 0
then 1
else 0
else exp (log x * y) * cos (y * π) :=
by split_ifs; simp [rpow_def, *]; exact rpow_def_of_neg (lt_of_le_of_ne hx h) _
lemma rpow_pos_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : 0 < x ^ y :=
by rw rpow_def_of_pos hx; apply exp_pos
@[simp] lemma rpow_zero (x : ℝ) : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 := by simp [rpow_def]
@[simp] lemma zero_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℝ) ^ x = 0 :=
by simp [rpow_def, *]
@[simp] lemma rpow_one (x : ℝ) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x := by simp [rpow_def]
@[simp] lemma one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ) ^ x = 1 := by simp [rpow_def]
lemma zero_rpow_le_one (x : ℝ) : (0 : ℝ) ^ x ≤ 1 :=
by { by_cases h : x = 0; simp [h, zero_le_one] }
lemma zero_rpow_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ (0 : ℝ) ^ x :=
by { by_cases h : x = 0; simp [h, zero_le_one] }
lemma rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : 0 ≤ x ^ y :=
by rw [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx];
split_ifs; simp only [zero_le_one, le_refl, le_of_lt (exp_pos _)]
lemma abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow (x y : ℝ) : abs (x ^ y) ≤ abs (x) ^ y :=
begin
rcases lt_trichotomy 0 x with (hx|rfl|hx),
{ rw [abs_of_pos hx, abs_of_pos (rpow_pos_of_pos hx _)] },
{ rw [abs_zero, abs_of_nonneg (rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg le_rfl _)] },
{ rw [abs_of_neg hx, rpow_def_of_neg hx, rpow_def_of_pos (neg_pos.2 hx), log_neg_eq_log,
abs_mul, abs_of_pos (exp_pos _)],
exact mul_le_of_le_one_right (exp_pos _).le (abs_cos_le_one _) }
end
lemma abs_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x) : abs (x ^ y) = (abs x) ^ y :=
begin
have h_rpow_nonneg : 0 ≤ x ^ y, from real.rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg hx_nonneg _,
rw [abs_eq_self.mpr hx_nonneg, abs_eq_self.mpr h_rpow_nonneg],
end
lemma norm_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x) : ∥x ^ y∥ = ∥x∥ ^ y :=
by { simp_rw real.norm_eq_abs, exact abs_rpow_of_nonneg hx_nonneg, }
end real
namespace complex
lemma of_real_cpow {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : ((x ^ y : ℝ) : ℂ) = (x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ) :=
by simp [real.rpow_def_of_nonneg hx, complex.cpow_def]; split_ifs; simp [complex.of_real_log hx]
@[simp] lemma abs_cpow_real (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) : abs (x ^ (y : ℂ)) = x.abs ^ y :=
begin
rw [real.rpow_def_of_nonneg (abs_nonneg _), complex.cpow_def],
split_ifs;
simp [*, abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt (real.exp_pos _)), complex.log, complex.exp_add,
add_mul, mul_right_comm _ I, exp_mul_I, abs_cos_add_sin_mul_I,
(complex.of_real_mul _ _).symm, -complex.of_real_mul, -is_R_or_C.of_real_mul] at *
end
@[simp] lemma abs_cpow_inv_nat (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : abs (x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℂ)) = x.abs ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ) :=
by rw ← abs_cpow_real; simp [-abs_cpow_real]
end complex
namespace real
variables {x y z : ℝ}
lemma rpow_add {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
by simp only [rpow_def_of_pos hx, mul_add, exp_add]
lemma rpow_add' {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) {y z : ℝ} (h : y + z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
begin
rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 hx with H|pos,
{ simp only [← H, h, rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg, true_and, zero_rpow, eq_self_iff_true, ne.def,
not_false_iff, zero_eq_mul],
by_contradiction F,
push_neg at F,
apply h,
simp [F] },
{ exact rpow_add pos _ _ }
end
/-- For `0 ≤ x`, the only problematic case in the equality `x ^ y * x ^ z = x ^ (y + z)` is for
`x = 0` and `y + z = 0`, where the right hand side is `1` while the left hand side can vanish.
The inequality is always true, though, and given in this lemma. -/
lemma le_rpow_add {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ y * x ^ z ≤ x ^ (y + z) :=
begin
rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 hx with H|pos,
{ by_cases h : y + z = 0,
{ simp only [H.symm, h, rpow_zero],
calc (0 : ℝ) ^ y * 0 ^ z ≤ 1 * 1 :
mul_le_mul (zero_rpow_le_one y) (zero_rpow_le_one z) (zero_rpow_nonneg z) zero_le_one
... = 1 : by simp },
{ simp [rpow_add', ← H, h] } },
{ simp [rpow_add pos] }
end
lemma rpow_mul {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z :=
by rw [← complex.of_real_inj, complex.of_real_cpow (rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg hx _),
complex.of_real_cpow hx, complex.of_real_mul, complex.cpow_mul, complex.of_real_cpow hx];
simp only [(complex.of_real_mul _ _).symm, (complex.of_real_log hx).symm,
complex.of_real_im, neg_lt_zero, pi_pos, le_of_lt pi_pos]
lemma rpow_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : x ^ -y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
by simp only [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]; split_ifs; simp [*, exp_neg] at *
lemma rpow_sub {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
by simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, rpow_add hx, rpow_neg (le_of_lt hx), div_eq_mul_inv]
lemma rpow_sub' {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) {y z : ℝ} (h : y - z ≠ 0) :
x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
by { simp only [sub_eq_add_neg] at h ⊢, simp only [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_neg hx, div_eq_mul_inv] }
@[simp] lemma rpow_nat_cast (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n :=
by simp only [rpow_def, (complex.of_real_pow _ _).symm, complex.cpow_nat_cast,
complex.of_real_nat_cast, complex.of_real_re]
@[simp] lemma rpow_int_cast (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n :=
by simp only [rpow_def, (complex.of_real_fpow _ _).symm, complex.cpow_int_cast,
complex.of_real_int_cast, complex.of_real_re]
lemma rpow_neg_one (x : ℝ) : x ^ (-1 : ℝ) = x⁻¹ :=
begin
suffices H : x ^ ((-1 : ℤ) : ℝ) = x⁻¹, by exact_mod_cast H,
simp only [rpow_int_cast, fpow_one, fpow_neg],
end
lemma mul_rpow {x y z : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) (h₁ : 0 ≤ y) : (x*y)^z = x^z * y^z :=
begin
iterate 3 { rw real.rpow_def_of_nonneg }, split_ifs; simp * at *,
{ have hx : 0 < x,
{ cases lt_or_eq_of_le h with h₂ h₂, { exact h₂ },
exfalso, apply h_2, exact eq.symm h₂ },
have hy : 0 < y,
{ cases lt_or_eq_of_le h₁ with h₂ h₂, { exact h₂ },
exfalso, apply h_3, exact eq.symm h₂ },
rw [log_mul (ne_of_gt hx) (ne_of_gt hy), add_mul, exp_add]},
{ exact h₁ },
{ exact h },
{ exact mul_nonneg h h₁ },
end
lemma inv_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : (x⁻¹)^y = (x^y)⁻¹ :=
begin
by_cases hy0 : y = 0, { simp [*] },
by_cases hx0 : x = 0, { simp [*] },
simp only [real.rpow_def_of_nonneg hx, real.rpow_def_of_nonneg (inv_nonneg.2 hx), if_false,
hx0, mt inv_eq_zero.1 hx0, log_inv, ← neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, exp_neg]
end
lemma div_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (z : ℝ) : (x / y) ^ z = x^z / y^z :=
by simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_rpow hx (inv_nonneg.2 hy), inv_rpow hy]
lemma log_rpow {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : log (x^y) = y * (log x) :=
begin
apply exp_injective,
rw [exp_log (rpow_pos_of_pos hx y), ← exp_log hx, mul_comm, rpow_def_of_pos (exp_pos (log x)) y],
end
lemma rpow_lt_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hxy : x < y) (hz : 0 < z) : x^z < y^z :=
begin
rw le_iff_eq_or_lt at hx, cases hx,
{ rw [← hx, zero_rpow (ne_of_gt hz)], exact rpow_pos_of_pos (by rwa ← hx at hxy) _ },
rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx, rpow_def_of_pos (lt_trans hx hxy), exp_lt_exp],
exact mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right (log_lt_log hx hxy) hz
end
lemma rpow_le_rpow {x y z: ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : 0 ≤ z) : x^z ≤ y^z :=
begin
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h₁ with rfl|h₁', { refl },
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h₂ with rfl|h₂', { simp },
exact le_of_lt (rpow_lt_rpow h h₁' h₂')
end
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ x < y :=
⟨lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le $ λ h, rpow_le_rpow hy h (le_of_lt hz), λ h, rpow_lt_rpow hx h hz⟩
lemma rpow_le_rpow_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ x ≤ y :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 $ rpow_lt_rpow_iff hy hx hz
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt (hx : 1 < x) (hyz : y < z) : x^y < x^z :=
begin
repeat {rw [rpow_def_of_pos (lt_trans zero_lt_one hx)]},
rw exp_lt_exp, exact mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left hyz (log_pos hx),
end
lemma rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hyz : y ≤ z) : x^y ≤ x^z :=
begin
repeat {rw [rpow_def_of_pos (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hx)]},
rw exp_le_exp, exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hyz (log_nonneg hx),
end
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x < 1) (hyz : z < y) :
x^y < x^z :=
begin
repeat {rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx0]},
rw exp_lt_exp, exact mul_lt_mul_of_neg_left hyz (log_neg hx0 hx1),
end
lemma rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x ≤ 1) (hyz : z ≤ y) :
x^y ≤ x^z :=
begin
repeat {rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx0]},
rw exp_le_exp, exact mul_le_mul_of_nonpos_left hyz (log_nonpos (le_of_lt hx0) hx1),
end
lemma rpow_lt_one {x z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 ≤ x) (hx2 : x < 1) (hz : 0 < z) : x^z < 1 :=
by { rw ← one_rpow z, exact rpow_lt_rpow hx1 hx2 hz }
lemma rpow_le_one {x z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 ≤ x) (hx2 : x ≤ 1) (hz : 0 ≤ z) : x^z ≤ 1 :=
by { rw ← one_rpow z, exact rpow_le_rpow hx1 hx2 hz }
lemma rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg {x z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : z < 0) : x^z < 1 :=
by { convert rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt hx hz, exact (rpow_zero x).symm }
lemma rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos {x z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hz : z ≤ 0) : x^z ≤ 1 :=
by { convert rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le hx hz, exact (rpow_zero x).symm }
lemma one_lt_rpow {x z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : 0 < z) : 1 < x^z :=
by { rw ← one_rpow z, exact rpow_lt_rpow zero_le_one hx hz }
lemma one_le_rpow {x z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hz : 0 ≤ z) : 1 ≤ x^z :=
by { rw ← one_rpow z, exact rpow_le_rpow zero_le_one hx hz }
lemma one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x < 1) (hz : z < 0) :
1 < x^z :=
by { convert rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt hx1 hx2 hz, exact (rpow_zero x).symm }
lemma one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x ≤ 1) (hz : z ≤ 0) :
1 ≤ x^z :=
by { convert rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge hx1 hx2 hz, exact (rpow_zero x).symm }
lemma rpow_lt_one_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : x ^ y < 1 ↔ 1 < x ∧ y < 0 ∨ x < 1 ∧ 0 < y :=
by rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx, exp_lt_one_iff, mul_neg_iff, log_pos_iff hx, log_neg_iff hx]
lemma rpow_lt_one_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) : x ^ y < 1 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 ∨ 1 < x ∧ y < 0 ∨ x < 1 ∧ 0 < y :=
begin
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl|hx),
{ rcases em (y = 0) with (rfl|hy); simp [*, lt_irrefl, zero_lt_one] },
{ simp [rpow_lt_one_iff_of_pos hx, hx.ne.symm] }
end
lemma one_lt_rpow_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : 1 < x ^ y ↔ 1 < x ∧ 0 < y ∨ x < 1 ∧ y < 0 :=
by rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx, one_lt_exp_iff, mul_pos_iff, log_pos_iff hx, log_neg_iff hx]
lemma one_lt_rpow_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) : 1 < x ^ y ↔ 1 < x ∧ 0 < y ∨ 0 < x ∧ x < 1 ∧ y < 0 :=
begin
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl|hx),
{ rcases em (y = 0) with (rfl|hy); simp [*, lt_irrefl, (@zero_lt_one ℝ _ _).not_lt] },
{ simp [one_lt_rpow_iff_of_pos hx, hx] }
end
lemma rpow_le_one_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : x ^ y ≤ 1 ↔ 1 ≤ x ∧ y ≤ 0 ∨ x ≤ 1 ∧ 0 ≤ y :=
by rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx, exp_le_one_iff, mul_nonpos_iff, log_nonneg_iff hx, log_nonpos_iff hx]
lemma pow_nat_rpow_nat_inv {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
(x ^ n) ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ) = x :=
have hn0 : (n : ℝ) ≠ 0, by simpa [pos_iff_ne_zero] using hn,
by rw [← rpow_nat_cast, ← rpow_mul hx, mul_inv_cancel hn0, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_nat_inv_pow_nat {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
(x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ)) ^ n = x :=
have hn0 : (n : ℝ) ≠ 0, by simpa [pos_iff_ne_zero] using hn,
by rw [← rpow_nat_cast, ← rpow_mul hx, inv_mul_cancel hn0, rpow_one]
section prove_rpow_is_continuous
lemma continuous_rpow_aux1 : continuous (λp : {p:ℝ×ℝ // 0 < p.1}, p.val.1 ^ p.val.2) :=
suffices h : continuous (λ p : {p:ℝ×ℝ // 0 < p.1 }, exp (log p.val.1 * p.val.2)),
by { convert h, ext p, rw rpow_def_of_pos p.2 },
continuous_exp.comp $
(show continuous ((λp:{p:ℝ//0 < p}, log (p.val)) ∘ (λp:{p:ℝ×ℝ//0<p.fst}, ⟨p.val.1, p.2⟩)), from
continuous_log'.comp $ continuous_subtype_mk _ $ continuous_fst.comp continuous_subtype_val).mul
(continuous_snd.comp $ continuous_subtype_val.comp continuous_id)
lemma continuous_rpow_aux2 : continuous (λ p : {p:ℝ×ℝ // p.1 < 0}, p.val.1 ^ p.val.2) :=
suffices h : continuous (λp:{p:ℝ×ℝ // p.1 < 0}, exp (log (-p.val.1) * p.val.2) * cos (p.val.2 * π)),
by { convert h, ext p, rw [rpow_def_of_neg p.2, log_neg_eq_log] },
(continuous_exp.comp $
(show continuous $ (λp:{p:ℝ//0<p},
log (p.val))∘(λp:{p:ℝ×ℝ//p.1<0}, ⟨-p.val.1, neg_pos_of_neg p.2⟩),
from continuous_log'.comp $ continuous_subtype_mk _ $ continuous_neg.comp $
continuous_fst.comp continuous_subtype_val).mul
(continuous_snd.comp $ continuous_subtype_val.comp continuous_id)).mul
(continuous_cos.comp $
(continuous_snd.comp $ continuous_subtype_val.comp continuous_id).mul continuous_const)
lemma continuous_at_rpow_of_ne_zero (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) :
continuous_at (λp:ℝ×ℝ, p.1^p.2) (x, y) :=
begin
cases lt_trichotomy 0 x,
exact continuous_within_at.continuous_at
(continuous_on_iff_continuous_restrict.2 continuous_rpow_aux1 _ h)
(mem_nhds_sets (by { convert (is_open_lt' (0:ℝ)).prod is_open_univ, ext, finish }) h),
cases h,
{ exact absurd h.symm hx },
exact continuous_within_at.continuous_at
(continuous_on_iff_continuous_restrict.2 continuous_rpow_aux2 _ h)
(mem_nhds_sets (by { convert (is_open_gt' (0:ℝ)).prod is_open_univ, ext, finish }) h)
end
lemma continuous_rpow_aux3 : continuous (λ p : {p:ℝ×ℝ // 0 < p.2}, p.val.1 ^ p.val.2) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ λ ⟨(x₀, y₀), hy₀⟩,
begin
by_cases hx₀ : x₀ = 0,
{ simp only [continuous_at, hx₀, zero_rpow (ne_of_gt hy₀), metric.tendsto_nhds_nhds],
assume ε ε0,
rcases exists_pos_rat_lt (half_pos hy₀) with ⟨q, q_pos, q_lt⟩,
let q := (q:ℝ), replace q_pos : 0 < q := rat.cast_pos.2 q_pos,
let δ := min (min q (ε ^ (1 / q))) (1/2),
have δ0 : 0 < δ := lt_min (lt_min q_pos (rpow_pos_of_pos ε0 _)) (by norm_num),
have : δ ≤ q := le_trans (min_le_left _ _) (min_le_left _ _),
have : δ ≤ ε ^ (1 / q) := le_trans (min_le_left _ _) (min_le_right _ _),
have : δ < 1 := lt_of_le_of_lt (min_le_right _ _) (by norm_num),
use δ, use δ0, rintros ⟨⟨x, y⟩, hy⟩,
simp only [subtype.dist_eq, real.dist_eq, prod.dist_eq, sub_zero, subtype.coe_mk],
assume h, rw max_lt_iff at h, cases h with xδ yy₀,
have qy : q < y, calc q < y₀ / 2 : q_lt
... = y₀ - y₀ / 2 : (sub_half _).symm
... ≤ y₀ - δ : by linarith
... < y : sub_lt_of_abs_sub_lt_left yy₀,
calc abs(x^y) ≤ abs(x)^y : abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow _ _
... < δ ^ y : rpow_lt_rpow (abs_nonneg _) xδ hy
... < δ ^ q : by { refine rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt _ _ _, repeat {linarith} }
... ≤ (ε ^ (1 / q)) ^ q : by { refine rpow_le_rpow _ _ _, repeat {linarith} }
... = ε : by { rw [← rpow_mul, div_mul_cancel, rpow_one], exact ne_of_gt q_pos, linarith }},
{ exact (continuous_within_at_iff_continuous_at_restrict (λp:ℝ×ℝ, p.1^p.2) _).1
(continuous_at_rpow_of_ne_zero hx₀ _).continuous_within_at }
end
lemma continuous_at_rpow_of_pos (hy : 0 < y) (x : ℝ) :
continuous_at (λp:ℝ×ℝ, p.1^p.2) (x, y) :=
continuous_within_at.continuous_at
(continuous_on_iff_continuous_restrict.2 continuous_rpow_aux3 _ hy)
(mem_nhds_sets (by { convert is_open_univ.prod (is_open_lt' (0:ℝ)), ext, finish }) hy)
lemma continuous_at_rpow {x y : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0 ∨ 0 < y) :
continuous_at (λp:ℝ×ℝ, p.1^p.2) (x, y) :=
by { cases h, exact continuous_at_rpow_of_ne_zero h _, exact continuous_at_rpow_of_pos h x }
variables {α : Type*} [topological_space α] {f g : α → ℝ}
/--
`real.rpow` is continuous at all points except for the lower half of the y-axis.
In other words, the function `λp:ℝ×ℝ, p.1^p.2` is continuous at `(x, y)` if `x ≠ 0` or `y > 0`.
Multiple forms of the claim is provided in the current section.
-/
lemma continuous_rpow (h : ∀a, f a ≠ 0 ∨ 0 < g a) (hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g):
continuous (λa:α, (f a) ^ (g a)) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ λ a,
begin
show continuous_at ((λp:ℝ×ℝ, p.1^p.2) ∘ (λa, (f a, g a))) a,
refine continuous_at.comp _ (continuous_iff_continuous_at.1 (hf.prod_mk hg) _),
{ replace h := h a, cases h,
{ exact continuous_at_rpow_of_ne_zero h _ },
{ exact continuous_at_rpow_of_pos h _ }},
end
lemma continuous_rpow_of_ne_zero (h : ∀a, f a ≠ 0) (hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g):
continuous (λa:α, (f a) ^ (g a)) := continuous_rpow (λa, or.inl $ h a) hf hg
lemma continuous_rpow_of_pos (h : ∀a, 0 < g a) (hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g):
continuous (λa:α, (f a) ^ (g a)) := continuous_rpow (λa, or.inr $ h a) hf hg
end prove_rpow_is_continuous
section prove_rpow_is_differentiable
lemma has_deriv_at_rpow_of_pos {x : ℝ} (h : 0 < x) (p : ℝ) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, x^p) (p * x^(p-1)) x :=
begin
have : has_deriv_at (λ x, exp (log x * p)) (p * x^(p-1)) x,
{ convert (has_deriv_at_exp _).comp x ((has_deriv_at_log (ne_of_gt h)).mul_const p) using 1,
field_simp [rpow_def_of_pos h, mul_sub, exp_sub, exp_log h, ne_of_gt h],
ring },
apply this.congr_of_eventually_eq,
have : set.Ioi (0 : ℝ) ∈ 𝓝 x := mem_nhds_sets is_open_Ioi h,
exact filter.eventually_of_mem this (λ y hy, rpow_def_of_pos hy _)
end
lemma has_deriv_at_rpow_of_neg {x : ℝ} (h : x < 0) (p : ℝ) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, x^p) (p * x^(p-1)) x :=
begin
have : has_deriv_at (λ x, exp (log x * p) * cos (p * π)) (p * x^(p-1)) x,
{ convert ((has_deriv_at_exp _).comp x ((has_deriv_at_log (ne_of_lt h)).mul_const p)).mul_const _
using 1,
field_simp [rpow_def_of_neg h, mul_sub, exp_sub, sub_mul, cos_sub, exp_log_of_neg h,
ne_of_lt h],
ring },
apply this.congr_of_eventually_eq,
have : set.Iio (0 : ℝ) ∈ 𝓝 x := mem_nhds_sets is_open_Iio h,
exact filter.eventually_of_mem this (λ y hy, rpow_def_of_neg hy _)
end
lemma has_deriv_at_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) (p : ℝ) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, x^p) (p * x^(p-1)) x :=
begin
rcases lt_trichotomy x 0 with H|H|H,
{ exact has_deriv_at_rpow_of_neg H p },
{ exact (h H).elim },
{ exact has_deriv_at_rpow_of_pos H p },
end
lemma has_deriv_at_rpow_zero_of_one_le {p : ℝ} (h : 1 ≤ p) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, x^p) (p * (0 : ℝ)^(p-1)) 0 :=
begin
apply has_deriv_at_of_has_deriv_at_of_ne (λ x hx, has_deriv_at_rpow hx p),
{ exact (continuous_rpow_of_pos (λ _, (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one h))
continuous_id continuous_const).continuous_at },
{ rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 h with rfl|h,
{ simp [continuous_const.continuous_at] },
{ exact (continuous_const.mul (continuous_rpow_of_pos (λ _, sub_pos_of_lt h)
continuous_id continuous_const)).continuous_at } }
end
lemma has_deriv_at_rpow_of_one_le (x : ℝ) {p : ℝ} (h : 1 ≤ p) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, x^p) (p * x^(p-1)) x :=
begin
by_cases hx : x = 0,
{ rw hx, exact has_deriv_at_rpow_zero_of_one_le h },
{ exact has_deriv_at_rpow hx p }
end
end prove_rpow_is_differentiable
section sqrt
lemma sqrt_eq_rpow : sqrt = λx:ℝ, x ^ (1/(2:ℝ)) :=
begin
funext, by_cases h : 0 ≤ x,
{ rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg, mul_self_sqrt h, ← pow_two, ← rpow_nat_cast, ← rpow_mul h],
norm_num, exact sqrt_nonneg _, exact rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg h _ },
{ replace h : x < 0 := lt_of_not_ge h,
have : 1 / (2:ℝ) * π = π / (2:ℝ), ring,
rw [sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos (le_of_lt h), rpow_def_of_neg h, this, cos_pi_div_two, mul_zero] }
end
end sqrt
instance : has_measurable_pow ℝ ℝ :=
⟨complex.measurable_re.comp $ ((complex.measurable_of_real.comp measurable_fst).pow
(complex.measurable_of_real.comp measurable_snd))⟩
end real
section differentiability
open real
variables {f : ℝ → ℝ} {x f' : ℝ} {s : set ℝ} (p : ℝ)
/- Differentiability statements for the power of a function, when the function does not vanish
and the exponent is arbitrary-/
lemma has_deriv_within_at.rpow (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ y, (f y)^p) (f' * p * (f x)^(p-1)) s x :=
begin
convert (has_deriv_at_rpow hx p).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hf using 1,
ring
end
lemma has_deriv_at.rpow (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
has_deriv_at (λ y, (f y)^p) (f' * p * (f x)^(p-1)) x :=
begin
rw ← has_deriv_within_at_univ at *,
exact hf.rpow p hx
end
lemma differentiable_within_at.rpow (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
differentiable_within_at ℝ (λx, (f x)^p) s x :=
(hf.has_deriv_within_at.rpow p hx).differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.rpow (hf : differentiable_at ℝ f x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
differentiable_at ℝ (λx, (f x)^p) x :=
(hf.has_deriv_at.rpow p hx).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.rpow (hf : differentiable_on ℝ f s) (hx : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0) :
differentiable_on ℝ (λx, (f x)^p) s :=
λx h, (hf x h).rpow p (hx x h)
@[simp] lemma differentiable.rpow (hf : differentiable ℝ f) (hx : ∀ x, f x ≠ 0) :
differentiable ℝ (λx, (f x)^p) :=
λx, (hf x).rpow p (hx x)
lemma deriv_within_rpow (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x) (hx : f x ≠ 0)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℝ s x) :
deriv_within (λx, (f x)^p) s x = (deriv_within f s x) * p * (f x)^(p-1) :=
(hf.has_deriv_within_at.rpow p hx).deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_rpow (hf : differentiable_at ℝ f x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
deriv (λx, (f x)^p) x = (deriv f x) * p * (f x)^(p-1) :=
(hf.has_deriv_at.rpow p hx).deriv
/- Differentiability statements for the power of a function, when the function may vanish
but the exponent is at least one. -/
variable {p}
lemma has_deriv_within_at.rpow_of_one_le (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (hp : 1 ≤ p) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ y, (f y)^p) (f' * p * (f x)^(p-1)) s x :=
begin
convert (has_deriv_at_rpow_of_one_le (f x) hp).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hf using 1,
ring
end
lemma has_deriv_at.rpow_of_one_le (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) (hp : 1 ≤ p) :
has_deriv_at (λ y, (f y)^p) (f' * p * (f x)^(p-1)) x :=
begin
rw ← has_deriv_within_at_univ at *,
exact hf.rpow_of_one_le hp
end
lemma differentiable_within_at.rpow_of_one_le (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x) (hp : 1 ≤ p) :
differentiable_within_at ℝ (λx, (f x)^p) s x :=
(hf.has_deriv_within_at.rpow_of_one_le hp).differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.rpow_of_one_le (hf : differentiable_at ℝ f x) (hp : 1 ≤ p) :
differentiable_at ℝ (λx, (f x)^p) x :=
(hf.has_deriv_at.rpow_of_one_le hp).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.rpow_of_one_le (hf : differentiable_on ℝ f s) (hp : 1 ≤ p) :
differentiable_on ℝ (λx, (f x)^p) s :=
λx h, (hf x h).rpow_of_one_le hp
@[simp] lemma differentiable.rpow_of_one_le (hf : differentiable ℝ f) (hp : 1 ≤ p) :
differentiable ℝ (λx, (f x)^p) :=
λx, (hf x).rpow_of_one_le hp
lemma deriv_within_rpow_of_one_le (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x) (hp : 1 ≤ p)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℝ s x) :
deriv_within (λx, (f x)^p) s x = (deriv_within f s x) * p * (f x)^(p-1) :=
(hf.has_deriv_within_at.rpow_of_one_le hp).deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_rpow_of_one_le (hf : differentiable_at ℝ f x) (hp : 1 ≤ p) :
deriv (λx, (f x)^p) x = (deriv f x) * p * (f x)^(p-1) :=
(hf.has_deriv_at.rpow_of_one_le hp).deriv
end differentiability
section limits
open real filter
/-- The function `x ^ y` tends to `+∞` at `+∞` for any positive real `y`. -/
lemma tendsto_rpow_at_top {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : tendsto (λ x : ℝ, x ^ y) at_top at_top :=
begin
rw tendsto_at_top_at_top,
intro b,
use (max b 0) ^ (1/y),
intros x hx,
exact le_of_max_le_left
(by { convert rpow_le_rpow (rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg (le_max_right b 0) (1/y)) hx (le_of_lt hy),
rw [← rpow_mul (le_max_right b 0), (eq_div_iff (ne_of_gt hy)).mp rfl, rpow_one] }),
end
/-- The function `x ^ (-y)` tends to `0` at `+∞` for any positive real `y`. -/
lemma tendsto_rpow_neg_at_top {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : tendsto (λ x : ℝ, x ^ (-y)) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto.congr' (eventually_eq_of_mem (Ioi_mem_at_top 0) (λ x hx, (rpow_neg (le_of_lt hx) y).symm))
(tendsto_rpow_at_top hy).inv_tendsto_at_top
/-- The function `x ^ (a / (b * x + c))` tends to `1` at `+∞`, for any real numbers `a`, `b`, and
`c` such that `b` is nonzero. -/
lemma tendsto_rpow_div_mul_add (a b c : ℝ) (hb : 0 ≠ b) :
tendsto (λ x, x ^ (a / (b*x+c))) at_top (𝓝 1) :=
begin
refine tendsto.congr' _ ((tendsto_exp_nhds_0_nhds_1.comp
(by simpa only [mul_zero, pow_one] using ((@tendsto_const_nhds _ _ _ a _).mul
(tendsto_div_pow_mul_exp_add_at_top b c 1 hb (by norm_num))))).comp (tendsto_log_at_top)),
apply eventually_eq_of_mem (Ioi_mem_at_top (0:ℝ)),
intros x hx,
simp only [set.mem_Ioi, function.comp_app] at hx ⊢,
rw [exp_log hx, ← exp_log (rpow_pos_of_pos hx (a / (b * x + c))), log_rpow hx (a / (b * x + c))],
field_simp,
end
/-- The function `x ^ (1 / x)` tends to `1` at `+∞`. -/
lemma tendsto_rpow_div : tendsto (λ x, x ^ ((1:ℝ) / x)) at_top (𝓝 1) :=
by { convert tendsto_rpow_div_mul_add (1:ℝ) _ (0:ℝ) zero_ne_one, ring_nf }
/-- The function `x ^ (-1 / x)` tends to `1` at `+∞`. -/
lemma tendsto_rpow_neg_div : tendsto (λ x, x ^ (-(1:ℝ) / x)) at_top (𝓝 1) :=
by { convert tendsto_rpow_div_mul_add (-(1:ℝ)) _ (0:ℝ) zero_ne_one, ring_nf }
end limits
namespace nnreal
/-- The nonnegative real power function `x^y`, defined for `x : ℝ≥0` and `y : ℝ ` as the
restriction of the real power function. For `x > 0`, it is equal to `exp (y log x)`. For `x = 0`,
one sets `0 ^ 0 = 1` and `0 ^ y = 0` for `y ≠ 0`. -/
noncomputable def rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 :=
⟨(x : ℝ) ^ y, real.rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg x.2 y⟩
noncomputable instance : has_pow ℝ≥0 ℝ := ⟨rpow⟩
@[simp] lemma rpow_eq_pow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : ((x ^ y : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (x : ℝ) ^ y := rfl
@[simp] lemma rpow_zero (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 :=
nnreal.eq $ real.rpow_zero _
@[simp] lemma rpow_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ≥0} {y : ℝ} : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 :=
begin
rw [← nnreal.coe_eq, coe_rpow, ← nnreal.coe_eq_zero],
exact real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg x.2
end
@[simp] lemma zero_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℝ≥0) ^ x = 0 :=
nnreal.eq $ real.zero_rpow h
@[simp] lemma rpow_one (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x :=
nnreal.eq $ real.rpow_one _
@[simp] lemma one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ≥0) ^ x = 1 :=
nnreal.eq $ real.one_rpow _
lemma rpow_add {x : ℝ≥0} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
nnreal.eq $ real.rpow_add (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hx) _ _
lemma rpow_add' (x : ℝ≥0) {y z : ℝ} (h : y + z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
nnreal.eq $ real.rpow_add' x.2 h
lemma rpow_mul (x : ℝ≥0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z :=
nnreal.eq $ real.rpow_mul x.2 y z
lemma rpow_neg (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ -y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
nnreal.eq $ real.rpow_neg x.2 _
lemma rpow_neg_one (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (-1 : ℝ) = x ⁻¹ :=
by simp [rpow_neg]
lemma rpow_sub {x : ℝ≥0} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
nnreal.eq $ real.rpow_sub (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hx) y z
lemma rpow_sub' (x : ℝ≥0) {y z : ℝ} (h : y - z ≠ 0) :
x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
nnreal.eq $ real.rpow_sub' x.2 h
lemma inv_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : (x⁻¹) ^ y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
nnreal.eq $ real.inv_rpow x.2 y
lemma div_rpow (x y : ℝ≥0) (z : ℝ) : (x / y) ^ z = x ^ z / y ^ z :=
nnreal.eq $ real.div_rpow x.2 y.2 z
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma rpow_nat_cast (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n :=
nnreal.eq $ by simpa only [coe_rpow, coe_pow] using real.rpow_nat_cast x n
lemma mul_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} : (x*y)^z = x^z * y^z :=
nnreal.eq $ real.mul_rpow x.2 y.2
lemma rpow_le_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z: ℝ} (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : 0 ≤ z) : x^z ≤ y^z :=
real.rpow_le_rpow x.2 h₁ h₂
lemma rpow_lt_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z: ℝ} (h₁ : x < y) (h₂ : 0 < z) : x^z < y^z :=
real.rpow_lt_rpow x.2 h₁ h₂
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ x < y :=
real.rpow_lt_rpow_iff x.2 y.2 hz
lemma rpow_le_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ x ≤ y :=
real.rpow_le_rpow_iff x.2 y.2 hz
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hyz : y < z) : x^y < x^z :=
real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt hx hyz
lemma rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hyz : y ≤ z) : x^y ≤ x^z :=
real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le hx hyz
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x < 1) (hyz : z < y) :
x^y < x^z :=
real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt hx0 hx1 hyz
lemma rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x ≤ 1) (hyz : z ≤ y) :
x^y ≤ x^z :=
real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge hx0 hx1 hyz
lemma rpow_lt_one {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hx1 : x < 1) (hz : 0 < z) : x^z < 1 :=
real.rpow_lt_one hx hx1 hz
lemma rpow_le_one {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx2 : x ≤ 1) (hz : 0 ≤ z) : x^z ≤ 1 :=
real.rpow_le_one x.2 hx2 hz
lemma rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : z < 0) : x^z < 1 :=
real.rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg hx hz
lemma rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hz : z ≤ 0) : x^z ≤ 1 :=
real.rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos hx hz
lemma one_lt_rpow {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : 0 < z) : 1 < x^z :=
real.one_lt_rpow hx hz
lemma one_le_rpow {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (h : 1 ≤ x) (h₁ : 0 ≤ z) : 1 ≤ x^z :=
real.one_le_rpow h h₁
lemma one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x < 1)
(hz : z < 0) : 1 < x^z :=
real.one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg hx1 hx2 hz
lemma one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x ≤ 1)
(hz : z ≤ 0) : 1 ≤ x^z :=
real.one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos hx1 hx2 hz
lemma pow_nat_rpow_nat_inv (x : ℝ≥0) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
(x ^ n) ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ) = x :=
by { rw [← nnreal.coe_eq, coe_rpow, nnreal.coe_pow], exact real.pow_nat_rpow_nat_inv x.2 hn }
lemma rpow_nat_inv_pow_nat (x : ℝ≥0) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
(x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ)) ^ n = x :=
by { rw [← nnreal.coe_eq, nnreal.coe_pow, coe_rpow], exact real.rpow_nat_inv_pow_nat x.2 hn }
lemma continuous_at_rpow {x : ℝ≥0} {y : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0 ∨ 0 < y) :
continuous_at (λp:ℝ≥0×ℝ, p.1^p.2) (x, y) :=
begin
have : (λp:ℝ≥0×ℝ, p.1^p.2) = nnreal.of_real ∘ (λp:ℝ×ℝ, p.1^p.2) ∘ (λp:ℝ≥0 × ℝ, (p.1.1, p.2)),
{ ext p,
rw [coe_rpow, nnreal.coe_of_real _ (real.rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg p.1.2 _)],
refl },
rw this,
refine nnreal.continuous_of_real.continuous_at.comp (continuous_at.comp _ _),
{ apply real.continuous_at_rpow,
simp at h,
rw ← (nnreal.coe_eq_zero x) at h,
exact h },
{ exact ((continuous_subtype_val.comp continuous_fst).prod_mk continuous_snd).continuous_at }
end
lemma of_real_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) :
nnreal.of_real (x ^ y) = (nnreal.of_real x) ^ y :=
begin
nth_rewrite 0 ← nnreal.coe_of_real x hx,
rw [←nnreal.coe_rpow, nnreal.of_real_coe],
end
instance : has_measurable_pow ℝ≥0 ℝ :=
⟨(measurable_fst.nnreal_coe.pow measurable_snd).subtype_mk⟩
end nnreal
open filter
lemma filter.tendsto.nnrpow {α : Type*} {f : filter α} {u : α → ℝ≥0} {v : α → ℝ} {x : ℝ≥0} {y : ℝ}
(hx : tendsto u f (𝓝 x)) (hy : tendsto v f (𝓝 y)) (h : x ≠ 0 ∨ 0 < y) :
tendsto (λ a, (u a) ^ (v a)) f (𝓝 (x ^ y)) :=
tendsto.comp (nnreal.continuous_at_rpow h) (hx.prod_mk_nhds hy)
namespace nnreal
lemma continuous_at_rpow_const {x : ℝ≥0} {y : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0 ∨ 0 ≤ y) :
continuous_at (λ z, z^y) x :=
h.elim (λ h, tendsto_id.nnrpow tendsto_const_nhds (or.inl h)) $
λ h, h.eq_or_lt.elim
(λ h, h ▸ by simp only [rpow_zero, continuous_at_const])
(λ h, tendsto_id.nnrpow tendsto_const_nhds (or.inr h))
lemma continuous_rpow_const {y : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ y) :
continuous (λ x : ℝ≥0, x^y) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ λ x, continuous_at_rpow_const (or.inr h)
end nnreal
namespace ennreal
/-- The real power function `x^y` on extended nonnegative reals, defined for `x : ℝ≥0∞` and
`y : ℝ` as the restriction of the real power function if `0 < x < ⊤`, and with the natural values
for `0` and `⊤` (i.e., `0 ^ x = 0` for `x > 0`, `1` for `x = 0` and `⊤` for `x < 0`, and
`⊤ ^ x = 1 / 0 ^ x`). -/
noncomputable def rpow : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ → ℝ≥0∞
| (some x) y := if x = 0 ∧ y < 0 then ⊤ else (x ^ y : ℝ≥0)
| none y := if 0 < y then ⊤ else if y = 0 then 1 else 0
noncomputable instance : has_pow ℝ≥0∞ ℝ := ⟨rpow⟩
@[simp] lemma rpow_eq_pow (x : ℝ≥0∞) (y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y := rfl
@[simp] lemma rpow_zero {x : ℝ≥0∞} : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 :=
by cases x; { dsimp only [(^), rpow], simp [lt_irrefl] }
lemma top_rpow_def (y : ℝ) : (⊤ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = if 0 < y then ⊤ else if y = 0 then 1 else 0 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma top_rpow_of_pos {y : ℝ} (h : 0 < y) : (⊤ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = ⊤ :=
by simp [top_rpow_def, h]
@[simp] lemma top_rpow_of_neg {y : ℝ} (h : y < 0) : (⊤ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = 0 :=
by simp [top_rpow_def, asymm h, ne_of_lt h]
@[simp] lemma zero_rpow_of_pos {y : ℝ} (h : 0 < y) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = 0 :=
begin
rw [← ennreal.coe_zero, ← ennreal.some_eq_coe],
dsimp only [(^), rpow],
simp [h, asymm h, ne_of_gt h],
end
@[simp] lemma zero_rpow_of_neg {y : ℝ} (h : y < 0) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = ⊤ :=
begin
rw [← ennreal.coe_zero, ← ennreal.some_eq_coe],
dsimp only [(^), rpow],
simp [h, ne_of_gt h],
end
lemma zero_rpow_def (y : ℝ) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = if 0 < y then 0 else if y = 0 then 1 else ⊤ :=
begin
rcases lt_trichotomy 0 y with H|rfl|H,
{ simp [H, ne_of_gt, zero_rpow_of_pos, lt_irrefl] },
{ simp [lt_irrefl] },
{ simp [H, asymm H, ne_of_lt, zero_rpow_of_neg] }
end
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_rpow_of_ne_zero {x : ℝ≥0} (h : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) :
(x : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = (x ^ y : ℝ≥0) :=
begin
rw [← ennreal.some_eq_coe],
dsimp only [(^), rpow],
simp [h]
end
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_rpow_of_nonneg (x : ℝ≥0) {y : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ y) :
(x : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = (x ^ y : ℝ≥0) :=
begin
by_cases hx : x = 0,
{ rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 h with H|H,
{ simp [hx, H.symm] },
{ simp [hx, zero_rpow_of_pos H, nnreal.zero_rpow (ne_of_gt H)] } },
{ exact coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hx _ }
end
lemma coe_rpow_def (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) :
(x : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = if x = 0 ∧ y < 0 then ⊤ else (x ^ y : ℝ≥0) := rfl
@[simp] lemma rpow_one (x : ℝ≥0∞) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x :=
by cases x; dsimp only [(^), rpow]; simp [zero_lt_one, not_lt_of_le zero_le_one]
@[simp] lemma one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ x = 1 :=
by { rw [← coe_one, coe_rpow_of_ne_zero one_ne_zero], simp }
@[simp] lemma rpow_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} :
x ^ y = 0 ↔ (x = 0 ∧ 0 < y) ∨ (x = ⊤ ∧ y < 0) :=
begin
cases x,
{ rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with H|H|H;
simp [H, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt] },
{ by_cases h : x = 0,
{ rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with H|H|H;
simp [h, H, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt] },
{ simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h, h] } }
end
@[simp] lemma rpow_eq_top_iff {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} :
x ^ y = ⊤ ↔ (x = 0 ∧ y < 0) ∨ (x = ⊤ ∧ 0 < y) :=
begin
cases x,
{ rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with H|H|H;
simp [H, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt] },
{ by_cases h : x = 0,
{ rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with H|H|H;
simp [h, H, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt] },
{ simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h, h] } }
end
lemma rpow_eq_top_iff_of_pos {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : x ^ y = ⊤ ↔ x = ⊤ :=
by simp [rpow_eq_top_iff, hy, asymm hy]
lemma rpow_eq_top_of_nonneg (x : ℝ≥0∞) {y : ℝ} (hy0 : 0 ≤ y) : x ^ y = ⊤ → x = ⊤ :=
begin
rw ennreal.rpow_eq_top_iff,
intro h,
cases h,
{ exfalso, rw lt_iff_not_ge at h, exact h.right hy0, },
{ exact h.left, },
end
lemma rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy0 : 0 ≤ y) (h : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ y ≠ ⊤ :=
mt (ennreal.rpow_eq_top_of_nonneg x hy0) h
lemma rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy0 : 0 ≤ y) (h : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ y < ⊤ :=
ennreal.lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr (ennreal.rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg hy0 h)
lemma rpow_add {x : ℝ≥0∞} (y z : ℝ) (hx : x ≠ 0) (h'x : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
begin
cases x, { exact (h'x rfl).elim },
have : x ≠ 0 := λ h, by simpa [h] using hx,
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero this, nnreal.rpow_add this]
end
lemma rpow_neg (x : ℝ≥0∞) (y : ℝ) : x ^ -y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
begin
cases x,
{ rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with H|H|H;
simp [top_rpow_of_pos, top_rpow_of_neg, H, neg_pos.mpr] },
{ by_cases h : x = 0,
{ rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with H|H|H;
simp [h, zero_rpow_of_pos, zero_rpow_of_neg, H, neg_pos.mpr] },
{ have A : x ^ y ≠ 0, by simp [h],
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h, ← coe_inv A, nnreal.rpow_neg] } }
end
lemma rpow_sub {x : ℝ≥0∞} (y z : ℝ) (hx : x ≠ 0) (h'x : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, rpow_add _ _ hx h'x, rpow_neg, div_eq_mul_inv]
lemma rpow_neg_one (x : ℝ≥0∞) : x ^ (-1 : ℝ) = x ⁻¹ :=
by simp [rpow_neg]
lemma rpow_mul (x : ℝ≥0∞) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z :=
begin
cases x,
{ rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with Hy|Hy|Hy;
rcases lt_trichotomy z 0 with Hz|Hz|Hz;
simp [Hy, Hz, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos,
mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg, mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos, mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg] },
{ by_cases h : x = 0,
{ rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with Hy|Hy|Hy;
rcases lt_trichotomy z 0 with Hz|Hz|Hz;
simp [h, Hy, Hz, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos,
mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg, mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos, mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg] },
{ have : x ^ y ≠ 0, by simp [h],
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h, coe_rpow_of_ne_zero this, nnreal.rpow_mul] } }
end
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma rpow_nat_cast (x : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n :=
begin
cases x,
{ cases n;
simp [top_rpow_of_pos (nat.cast_add_one_pos _), top_pow (nat.succ_pos _)] },
{ simp [coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (nat.cast_nonneg n)] }
end
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_mul_rpow (x y : ℝ≥0) (z : ℝ) :
((x : ℝ≥0∞) * y) ^ z = x^z * y^z :=
begin
rcases lt_trichotomy z 0 with H|H|H,
{ by_cases hx : x = 0; by_cases hy : y = 0,
{ simp [hx, hy, zero_rpow_of_neg, H] },
{ have : (y : ℝ≥0∞) ^ z ≠ 0, by simp [rpow_eq_zero_iff, hy],
simp [hx, hy, zero_rpow_of_neg, H, with_top.top_mul this] },
{ have : (x : ℝ≥0∞) ^ z ≠ 0, by simp [rpow_eq_zero_iff, hx],
simp [hx, hy, zero_rpow_of_neg H, with_top.mul_top this] },
{ rw [← coe_mul, coe_rpow_of_ne_zero, nnreal.mul_rpow, coe_mul,
coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hx, coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hy],
simp [hx, hy] } },
{ simp [H] },
{ by_cases hx : x = 0; by_cases hy : y = 0,
{ simp [hx, hy, zero_rpow_of_pos, H] },
{ have : (y : ℝ≥0∞) ^ z ≠ 0, by simp [rpow_eq_zero_iff, hy],
simp [hx, hy, zero_rpow_of_pos H, with_top.top_mul this] },
{ have : (x : ℝ≥0∞) ^ z ≠ 0, by simp [rpow_eq_zero_iff, hx],
simp [hx, hy, zero_rpow_of_pos H, with_top.mul_top this] },
{ rw [← coe_mul, coe_rpow_of_ne_zero, nnreal.mul_rpow, coe_mul,
coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hx, coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hy],
simp [hx, hy] } },
end
lemma mul_rpow_of_ne_top {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) (hy : y ≠ ⊤) (z : ℝ) :
(x * y) ^ z = x^z * y^z :=
begin
lift x to ℝ≥0 using hx,
lift y to ℝ≥0 using hy,
exact coe_mul_rpow x y z
end
lemma mul_rpow_of_ne_zero {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (z : ℝ) :
(x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z :=
begin
rcases lt_trichotomy z 0 with H|H|H,
{ cases x; cases y,
{ simp [hx, hy, top_rpow_of_neg, H] },
{ have : y ≠ 0, by simpa using hy,
simp [hx, hy, top_rpow_of_neg, H, rpow_eq_zero_iff, this] },
{ have : x ≠ 0, by simpa using hx,
simp [hx, hy, top_rpow_of_neg, H, rpow_eq_zero_iff, this] },
{ have hx' : x ≠ 0, by simpa using hx,
have hy' : y ≠ 0, by simpa using hy,
simp only [some_eq_coe],
rw [← coe_mul, coe_rpow_of_ne_zero, nnreal.mul_rpow, coe_mul,
coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hx', coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hy'],
simp [hx', hy'] } },
{ simp [H] },
{ cases x; cases y,
{ simp [hx, hy, top_rpow_of_pos, H] },
{ have : y ≠ 0, by simpa using hy,
simp [hx, hy, top_rpow_of_pos, H, rpow_eq_zero_iff, this] },
{ have : x ≠ 0, by simpa using hx,
simp [hx, hy, top_rpow_of_pos, H, rpow_eq_zero_iff, this] },
{ have hx' : x ≠ 0, by simpa using hx,
have hy' : y ≠ 0, by simpa using hy,
simp only [some_eq_coe],
rw [← coe_mul, coe_rpow_of_ne_zero, nnreal.mul_rpow, coe_mul,
coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hx', coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hy'],
simp [hx', hy'] } }
end
lemma mul_rpow_of_nonneg (x y : ℝ≥0∞) {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
(x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z :=
begin
rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 hz with H|H, { simp [← H] },
by_cases h : x = 0 ∨ y = 0,
{ cases h; simp [h, zero_rpow_of_pos H] },
push_neg at h,
exact mul_rpow_of_ne_zero h.1 h.2 z
end
lemma inv_rpow_of_pos {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : (x⁻¹) ^ y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
begin
by_cases h0 : x = 0,
{ rw [h0, zero_rpow_of_pos hy, inv_zero, top_rpow_of_pos hy], },
by_cases h_top : x = ⊤,
{ rw [h_top, top_rpow_of_pos hy, inv_top, zero_rpow_of_pos hy], },
rw ←coe_to_nnreal h_top,
have h : x.to_nnreal ≠ 0,
{ rw [ne.def, to_nnreal_eq_zero_iff],
simp [h0, h_top], },
rw [←coe_inv h, coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (le_of_lt hy), coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (le_of_lt hy), ←coe_inv],
{ rw coe_eq_coe,
exact nnreal.inv_rpow x.to_nnreal y, },
{ simp [h], },
end
lemma div_rpow_of_nonneg (x y : ℝ≥0∞) {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
(x / y) ^ z = x ^ z / y ^ z :=
begin
by_cases h0 : z = 0,
{ simp [h0], },
rw ←ne.def at h0,
have hz_pos : 0 < z, from lt_of_le_of_ne hz h0.symm,
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_rpow_of_nonneg x y⁻¹ hz, inv_rpow_of_pos hz_pos, ←div_eq_mul_inv],
end
lemma rpow_le_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : 0 ≤ z) : x^z ≤ y^z :=
begin
rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 h₂ with H|H, { simp [← H, le_refl] },
cases y, { simp [top_rpow_of_pos H] },
cases x, { exact (not_top_le_coe h₁).elim },
simp at h₁,
simp [coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ h₂, nnreal.rpow_le_rpow h₁ h₂]
end
lemma rpow_lt_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (h₁ : x < y) (h₂ : 0 < z) : x^z < y^z :=
begin
cases x, { exact (not_top_lt h₁).elim },
cases y, { simp [top_rpow_of_pos h₂, coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (le_of_lt h₂)] },
simp at h₁,
simp [coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (le_of_lt h₂), nnreal.rpow_lt_rpow h₁ h₂]
end
lemma rpow_le_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ x ≤ y :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, λ h, rpow_le_rpow h (le_of_lt hz)⟩,
rw [←rpow_one x, ←rpow_one y, ←@_root_.mul_inv_cancel _ _ z (ne_of_lt hz).symm, rpow_mul,
rpow_mul, ←one_div],
exact rpow_le_rpow h (by simp [le_of_lt hz]),
end
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ x < y :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h_lt, _, λ h, rpow_lt_rpow h hz⟩,
rw [←rpow_one x, ←rpow_one y, ←@_root_.mul_inv_cancel _ _ z (ne_of_lt hz).symm, rpow_mul,
rpow_mul],
exact rpow_lt_rpow h_lt (by simp [hz]),
end
lemma le_rpow_one_div_iff {x y : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ≤ y ^ (1 / z) ↔ x ^ z ≤ y :=
begin
nth_rewrite 0 ←rpow_one x,
nth_rewrite 0 ←@_root_.mul_inv_cancel _ _ z (ne_of_lt hz).symm,
rw [rpow_mul, ←one_div, @rpow_le_rpow_iff _ _ (1/z) (by simp [hz])],
end
lemma lt_rpow_one_div_iff {x y : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x < y ^ (1 / z) ↔ x ^ z < y :=
begin
nth_rewrite 0 ←rpow_one x,
nth_rewrite 0 ←@_root_.mul_inv_cancel _ _ z (ne_of_lt hz).symm,
rw [rpow_mul, ←one_div, @rpow_lt_rpow_iff _ _ (1/z) (by simp [hz])],
end
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hx' : x ≠ ⊤) (hyz : y < z) :
x^y < x^z :=
begin
lift x to ℝ≥0 using hx',
rw [one_lt_coe_iff] at hx,
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (ne_of_gt (lt_trans zero_lt_one hx)),
nnreal.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt hx hyz]
end
lemma rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hyz : y ≤ z) : x^y ≤ x^z :=
begin
cases x,
{ rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with Hy|Hy|Hy;
rcases lt_trichotomy z 0 with Hz|Hz|Hz;
simp [Hy, Hz, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos, le_refl];
linarith },
{ simp only [one_le_coe_iff, some_eq_coe] at hx,
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (ne_of_gt (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hx)),
nnreal.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le hx hyz] }
end
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y z : ℝ} (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x < 1) (hyz : z < y) :
x^y < x^z :=
begin
lift x to ℝ≥0 using ne_of_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le hx1 le_top),
simp at hx0 hx1,
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (ne_of_gt hx0), nnreal.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt hx0 hx1 hyz]
end
lemma rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y z : ℝ} (hx1 : x ≤ 1) (hyz : z ≤ y) :
x^y ≤ x^z :=
begin
lift x to ℝ≥0 using ne_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt hx1 coe_lt_top),
by_cases h : x = 0,
{ rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with Hy|Hy|Hy;
rcases lt_trichotomy z 0 with Hz|Hz|Hz;
simp [Hy, Hz, h, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, le_refl];
linarith },
{ simp at hx1,
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h,
nnreal.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge (bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr h) hx1 hyz] }
end
lemma rpow_le_self_of_le_one {x : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 1) (h_one_le : 1 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ x :=
begin
nth_rewrite 1 ←ennreal.rpow_one x,
exact ennreal.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge hx h_one_le,
end
lemma le_rpow_self_of_one_le {x : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (h_one_le : 1 ≤ z) : x ≤ x ^ z :=
begin
nth_rewrite 0 ←ennreal.rpow_one x,
exact ennreal.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le hx h_one_le,
end
lemma rpow_pos_of_nonneg {p : ℝ} {x : ℝ≥0∞} (hx_pos : 0 < x) (hp_nonneg : 0 ≤ p) : 0 < x^p :=
begin
by_cases hp_zero : p = 0,
{ simp [hp_zero, ennreal.zero_lt_one], },
{ rw ←ne.def at hp_zero,
have hp_pos := lt_of_le_of_ne hp_nonneg hp_zero.symm,
rw ←zero_rpow_of_pos hp_pos, exact rpow_lt_rpow hx_pos hp_pos, },
end
lemma rpow_pos {p : ℝ} {x : ℝ≥0∞} (hx_pos : 0 < x) (hx_ne_top : x ≠ ⊤) : 0 < x^p :=
begin
cases lt_or_le 0 p with hp_pos hp_nonpos,
{ exact rpow_pos_of_nonneg hx_pos (le_of_lt hp_pos), },
{ rw [←neg_neg p, rpow_neg, inv_pos],
exact rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg (by simp [hp_nonpos]) hx_ne_top, },
end
lemma rpow_lt_one {x : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hx : x < 1) (hz : 0 < z) : x^z < 1 :=
begin
lift x to ℝ≥0 using ne_of_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le hx le_top),
simp only [coe_lt_one_iff] at hx,
simp [coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (le_of_lt hz), nnreal.rpow_lt_one (zero_le x) hx hz],
end
lemma rpow_le_one {x : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 1) (hz : 0 ≤ z) : x^z ≤ 1 :=
begin
lift x to ℝ≥0 using ne_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt hx coe_lt_top),
simp only [coe_le_one_iff] at hx,
simp [coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ hz, nnreal.rpow_le_one hx hz],
end
lemma rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg {x : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : z < 0) : x^z < 1 :=
begin
cases x,
{ simp [top_rpow_of_neg hz, ennreal.zero_lt_one] },
{ simp only [some_eq_coe, one_lt_coe_iff] at hx,
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (ne_of_gt (lt_trans zero_lt_one hx)),
nnreal.rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg hx hz] },
end
lemma rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_neg {x : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hz : z < 0) : x^z ≤ 1 :=
begin
cases x,
{ simp [top_rpow_of_neg hz, ennreal.zero_lt_one] },
{ simp only [one_le_coe_iff, some_eq_coe] at hx,
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (ne_of_gt (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hx)),
nnreal.rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos hx (le_of_lt hz)] },
end
lemma one_lt_rpow {x : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : 0 < z) : 1 < x^z :=
begin
cases x,
{ simp [top_rpow_of_pos hz] },
{ simp only [some_eq_coe, one_lt_coe_iff] at hx,
simp [coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (le_of_lt hz), nnreal.one_lt_rpow hx hz] }
end
lemma one_le_rpow {x : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hz : 0 < z) : 1 ≤ x^z :=
begin
cases x,
{ simp [top_rpow_of_pos hz] },
{ simp only [one_le_coe_iff, some_eq_coe] at hx,
simp [coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (le_of_lt hz), nnreal.one_le_rpow hx (le_of_lt hz)] },
end
lemma one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg {x : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x < 1)
(hz : z < 0) : 1 < x^z :=
begin
lift x to ℝ≥0 using ne_of_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le hx2 le_top),
simp only [coe_lt_one_iff, coe_pos] at ⊢ hx1 hx2,
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (ne_of_gt hx1), nnreal.one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg hx1 hx2 hz],
end
lemma one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_neg {x : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x ≤ 1)
(hz : z < 0) : 1 ≤ x^z :=
begin
lift x to ℝ≥0 using ne_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt hx2 coe_lt_top),
simp only [coe_le_one_iff, coe_pos] at ⊢ hx1 hx2,
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (ne_of_gt hx1),
nnreal.one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos hx1 hx2 (le_of_lt hz)],
end
lemma to_nnreal_rpow (x : ℝ≥0∞) (z : ℝ) : (x.to_nnreal) ^ z = (x ^ z).to_nnreal :=
begin
rcases lt_trichotomy z 0 with H|H|H,
{ cases x, { simp [H, ne_of_lt] },
by_cases hx : x = 0,
{ simp [hx, H, ne_of_lt] },
{ simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hx] } },
{ simp [H] },
{ cases x, { simp [H, ne_of_gt] },
simp [coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (le_of_lt H)] }
end
lemma to_real_rpow (x : ℝ≥0∞) (z : ℝ) : (x.to_real) ^ z = (x ^ z).to_real :=
by rw [ennreal.to_real, ennreal.to_real, ←nnreal.coe_rpow, ennreal.to_nnreal_rpow]
lemma of_real_rpow_of_pos {x p : ℝ} (hx_pos : 0 < x) :
ennreal.of_real x ^ p = ennreal.of_real (x ^ p) :=
begin
simp_rw ennreal.of_real,
rw [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero, coe_eq_coe, nnreal.of_real_rpow_of_nonneg hx_pos.le],
simp [hx_pos],
end
lemma of_real_rpow_of_nonneg {x p : ℝ} (hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x) (hp_nonneg : 0 ≤ p) :
ennreal.of_real x ^ p = ennreal.of_real (x ^ p) :=
begin
by_cases hp0 : p = 0,
{ simp [hp0], },
by_cases hx0 : x = 0,
{ rw ← ne.def at hp0,
have hp_pos : 0 < p := lt_of_le_of_ne hp_nonneg hp0.symm,
simp [hx0, hp_pos, hp_pos.ne.symm], },
rw ← ne.def at hx0,
exact of_real_rpow_of_pos (hx_nonneg.lt_of_ne hx0.symm),
end
lemma rpow_left_injective {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
function.injective (λ y : ℝ≥0∞, y^x) :=
begin
intros y z hyz,
dsimp only at hyz,
rw [←rpow_one y, ←rpow_one z, ←_root_.mul_inv_cancel hx, rpow_mul, rpow_mul, hyz],
end
lemma rpow_left_surjective {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
function.surjective (λ y : ℝ≥0∞, y^x) :=
λ y, ⟨y ^ x⁻¹, by simp_rw [←rpow_mul, _root_.inv_mul_cancel hx, rpow_one]⟩
lemma rpow_left_bijective {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
function.bijective (λ y : ℝ≥0∞, y^x) :=
⟨rpow_left_injective hx, rpow_left_surjective hx⟩
lemma rpow_left_monotone_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : monotone (λ y : ℝ≥0∞, y^x) :=
λ y z hyz, rpow_le_rpow hyz hx
lemma rpow_left_strict_mono_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : strict_mono (λ y : ℝ≥0∞, y^x) :=
λ y z hyz, rpow_lt_rpow hyz hx
instance : has_measurable_pow ℝ≥0∞ ℝ :=
begin
refine ⟨ennreal.measurable_of_measurable_nnreal_prod _ _⟩,
{ simp_rw ennreal.coe_rpow_def,
refine measurable.ite _ measurable_const
(measurable_fst.pow measurable_snd).ennreal_coe,
exact measurable_set.inter (measurable_fst (measurable_set_singleton 0))
(measurable_snd measurable_set_Iio), },
{ simp_rw ennreal.top_rpow_def,
refine measurable.ite measurable_set_Ioi measurable_const _,
exact measurable.ite (measurable_set_singleton 0) measurable_const measurable_const, },
end
end ennreal
|
ea283ddc80a6e4de8cf8ce691c57fe2b4b1c0b52 | 2eab05920d6eeb06665e1a6df77b3157354316ad | /src/algebra/group/ulift.lean | 1e790e3fd147d2c8148a5ccf1b7d89eef055c4e4 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ayush1801/mathlib | 78949b9f789f488148142221606bf15c02b960d2 | ce164e28f262acbb3de6281b3b03660a9f744e3c | refs/heads/master | 1,692,886,907,941 | 1,635,270,866,000 | 1,635,270,866,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,098 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import data.equiv.mul_add
import tactic.pi_instances
/-!
# `ulift` instances for groups and monoids
This file defines instances for group, monoid, semigroup and related structures on `ulift` types.
(Recall `ulift α` is just a "copy" of a type `α` in a higher universe.)
We use `tactic.pi_instance_derive_field`, even though it wasn't intended for this purpose,
which seems to work fine.
We also provide `ulift.mul_equiv : ulift R ≃* R` (and its additive analogue).
-/
universes u v
variables {α : Type u} {x y : ulift.{v} α}
namespace ulift
@[to_additive] instance has_one [has_one α] : has_one (ulift α) := ⟨⟨1⟩⟩
@[simp, to_additive] lemma one_down [has_one α] : (1 : ulift α).down = 1 := rfl
@[to_additive] instance has_mul [has_mul α] : has_mul (ulift α) := ⟨λ f g, ⟨f.down * g.down⟩⟩
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mul_down [has_mul α] : (x * y).down = x.down * y.down := rfl
@[to_additive] instance has_div [has_div α] : has_div (ulift α) := ⟨λ f g, ⟨f.down / g.down⟩⟩
@[simp, to_additive] lemma div_down [has_div α] : (x / y).down = x.down / y.down := rfl
@[to_additive] instance has_inv [has_inv α] : has_inv (ulift α) := ⟨λ f, ⟨f.down⁻¹⟩⟩
@[simp, to_additive] lemma inv_down [has_inv α] : x⁻¹.down = (x.down)⁻¹ := rfl
/--
The multiplicative equivalence between `ulift α` and `α`.
-/
@[to_additive "The additive equivalence between `ulift α` and `α`."]
def mul_equiv [has_mul α] : ulift α ≃* α :=
{ to_fun := ulift.down,
inv_fun := ulift.up,
map_mul' := λ x y, rfl,
left_inv := by tidy,
right_inv := by tidy, }
@[to_additive]
instance semigroup [semigroup α] : semigroup (ulift α) :=
by refine_struct { mul := (*), .. }; tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
@[to_additive]
instance comm_semigroup [comm_semigroup α] : comm_semigroup (ulift α) :=
by refine_struct { mul := (*), .. }; tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
@[to_additive]
instance mul_one_class [mul_one_class α] : mul_one_class (ulift α) :=
by refine_struct { mul := (*), one := (1 : ulift α), .. }; tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
instance monoid [monoid α] : monoid (ulift α) :=
by refine_struct { one := (1 : ulift α), mul := (*), npow := λ n f, ⟨npow n f.down⟩ };
tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
instance add_monoid [add_monoid α] : add_monoid (ulift α) :=
by refine_struct { zero := (0 : ulift α), add := (+), nsmul := λ n f, ⟨nsmul n f.down⟩ };
tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
attribute [to_additive] ulift.monoid
@[to_additive]
instance comm_monoid [comm_monoid α] : comm_monoid (ulift α) :=
by refine_struct { one := (1 : ulift α), mul := (*), npow := λ n f, ⟨npow n f.down⟩ };
tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
@[to_additive]
instance group [group α] : group (ulift α) :=
by refine_struct { one := (1 : ulift α), mul := (*), inv := has_inv.inv, div := has_div.div,
npow := λ n f, ⟨npow n f.down⟩, gpow := λ n f, ⟨gpow n f.down⟩ }; tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
@[to_additive]
instance comm_group [comm_group α] : comm_group (ulift α) :=
by refine_struct { one := (1 : ulift α), mul := (*), inv := has_inv.inv, div := has_div.div,
npow := λ n f, ⟨npow n f.down⟩, gpow := λ n f, ⟨gpow n f.down⟩ }; tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
@[to_additive add_left_cancel_semigroup]
instance left_cancel_semigroup [left_cancel_semigroup α] :
left_cancel_semigroup (ulift α) :=
begin
refine_struct { mul := (*) }; tactic.pi_instance_derive_field,
have := congr_arg ulift.down ‹_›,
assumption,
end
@[to_additive add_right_cancel_semigroup]
instance right_cancel_semigroup [right_cancel_semigroup α] :
right_cancel_semigroup (ulift α) :=
begin
refine_struct { mul := (*) }; tactic.pi_instance_derive_field,
have := congr_arg ulift.down ‹_›,
assumption,
end
-- TODO we don't do `ordered_cancel_comm_monoid` or `ordered_comm_group`
-- We'd need to add instances for `ulift` in `order.basic`.
end ulift
|
3f6279e73f3eec1e740063f10fce6623169224d9 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/number_theory/dioph.lean | 303868f07b3099700cede045788770e649571981 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 25,510 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.number_theory.pell
import Mathlib.data.pfun
import Mathlib.data.fin2
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes u u_1 u_2 u_3
namespace Mathlib
namespace int
theorem eq_nat_abs_iff_mul (x : ℤ) (n : ℕ) : nat_abs x = n ↔ (x - ↑n) * (x + ↑n) = 0 := sorry
end int
/-- Alternate definition of `vector` based on `fin2`. -/
def vector3 (α : Type u) (n : ℕ) :=
fin2 n → α
namespace vector3
/-- The empty vector -/
def nil {α : Type u_1} : vector3 α 0 :=
sorry
/-- The vector cons operation -/
def cons {α : Type u_1} {n : ℕ} (a : α) (v : vector3 α n) : vector3 α (Nat.succ n) :=
fun (i : fin2 (Nat.succ n)) => fin2.cases' a v i
infixr:67 " :: " => Mathlib.vector3.cons
/- We do not want to make the following notation global, because then these expressions will be
overloaded, and only the expected type will be able to disambiguate the meaning. Worse: Lean will
try to insert a coercion from `vector3 α _` to `list α`, if a list is expected. -/
@[simp] theorem cons_fz {α : Type u_1} {n : ℕ} (a : α) (v : vector3 α n) : cons a v fin2.fz = a :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem cons_fs {α : Type u_1} {n : ℕ} (a : α) (v : vector3 α n) (i : fin2 n) : cons a v (fin2.fs i) = v i :=
rfl
/-- Get the `i`th element of a vector -/
def nth {α : Type u_1} {n : ℕ} (i : fin2 n) (v : vector3 α n) : α :=
v i
/-- Construct a vector from a function on `fin2`. -/
def of_fn {α : Type u_1} {n : ℕ} (f : fin2 n → α) : vector3 α n :=
f
/-- Get the head of a nonempty vector. -/
def head {α : Type u_1} {n : ℕ} (v : vector3 α (Nat.succ n)) : α :=
v fin2.fz
/-- Get the tail of a nonempty vector. -/
def tail {α : Type u_1} {n : ℕ} (v : vector3 α (Nat.succ n)) : vector3 α n :=
fun (i : fin2 n) => v (fin2.fs i)
theorem eq_nil {α : Type u_1} (v : vector3 α 0) : v = nil := sorry
theorem cons_head_tail {α : Type u_1} {n : ℕ} (v : vector3 α (Nat.succ n)) : head v :: tail v = v :=
funext fun (i : fin2 (Nat.succ n)) => fin2.cases' rfl (fun (_x : fin2 n) => rfl) i
def nil_elim {α : Type u_1} {C : vector3 α 0 → Sort u} (H : C nil) (v : vector3 α 0) : C v :=
eq.mpr sorry H
def cons_elim {α : Type u_1} {n : ℕ} {C : vector3 α (Nat.succ n) → Sort u} (H : (a : α) → (t : vector3 α n) → C (a :: t)) (v : vector3 α (Nat.succ n)) : C v :=
eq.mpr sorry (H (head v) (tail v))
@[simp] theorem cons_elim_cons {α : Type u_1} {n : ℕ} {C : vector3 α (Nat.succ n) → Sort u_2} {H : (a : α) → (t : vector3 α n) → C (a :: t)} {a : α} {t : vector3 α n} : cons_elim H (a :: t) = H a t :=
rfl
protected def rec_on {α : Type u_1} {C : {n : ℕ} → vector3 α n → Sort u} {n : ℕ} (v : vector3 α n) (H0 : C nil) (Hs : {n : ℕ} → (a : α) → (w : vector3 α n) → C w → C (a :: w)) : C v :=
nat.rec_on n (fun (v : vector3 α 0) => nil_elim H0 v)
(fun (n : ℕ) (IH : (_a : vector3 α n) → C _a) (v : vector3 α (Nat.succ n)) =>
cons_elim (fun (a : α) (t : vector3 α n) => Hs a t (IH t)) v)
v
@[simp] theorem rec_on_nil {α : Type u_1} {C : {n : ℕ} → vector3 α n → Sort u_2} {H0 : C nil} {Hs : {n : ℕ} → (a : α) → (w : vector3 α n) → C w → C (a :: w)} : vector3.rec_on nil H0 Hs = H0 :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem rec_on_cons {α : Type u_1} {C : {n : ℕ} → vector3 α n → Sort u_2} {H0 : C nil} {Hs : {n : ℕ} → (a : α) → (w : vector3 α n) → C w → C (a :: w)} {n : ℕ} {a : α} {v : vector3 α n} : vector3.rec_on (a :: v) H0 Hs = Hs a v (vector3.rec_on v H0 Hs) :=
rfl
/-- Append two vectors -/
def append {α : Type u_1} {m : ℕ} (v : vector3 α m) {n : ℕ} (w : vector3 α n) : vector3 α (n + m) :=
nat.rec_on m (fun (_x : vector3 α 0) => w)
(fun (m : ℕ) (IH : vector3 α m → vector3 α (n + m)) (v : vector3 α (Nat.succ m)) =>
cons_elim (fun (a : α) (t : vector3 α m) => fin2.cases' a (IH t)) v)
v
@[simp] theorem append_nil {α : Type u_1} {n : ℕ} (w : vector3 α n) : append nil w = w :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem append_cons {α : Type u_1} (a : α) {m : ℕ} (v : vector3 α m) {n : ℕ} (w : vector3 α n) : append (a :: v) w = a :: append v w :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem append_left {α : Type u_1} {m : ℕ} (i : fin2 m) (v : vector3 α m) {n : ℕ} (w : vector3 α n) : append v w (fin2.left n i) = v i := sorry
@[simp] theorem append_add {α : Type u_1} {m : ℕ} (v : vector3 α m) {n : ℕ} (w : vector3 α n) (i : fin2 n) : append v w (fin2.add i m) = w i := sorry
/-- Insert `a` into `v` at index `i`. -/
def insert {α : Type u_1} (a : α) {n : ℕ} (v : vector3 α n) (i : fin2 (Nat.succ n)) : vector3 α (Nat.succ n) :=
fun (j : fin2 (Nat.succ n)) => cons a v (fin2.insert_perm i j)
@[simp] theorem insert_fz {α : Type u_1} (a : α) {n : ℕ} (v : vector3 α n) : insert a v fin2.fz = a :: v := sorry
@[simp] theorem insert_fs {α : Type u_1} (a : α) {n : ℕ} (b : α) (v : vector3 α n) (i : fin2 (Nat.succ n)) : insert a (b :: v) (fin2.fs i) = b :: insert a v i := sorry
theorem append_insert {α : Type u_1} (a : α) {k : ℕ} (t : vector3 α k) {n : ℕ} (v : vector3 α n) (i : fin2 (Nat.succ n)) (e : Nat.succ n + k = Nat.succ (n + k)) : insert a (append t v) (eq.rec_on e (fin2.add i k)) = eq.rec_on e (append t (insert a v i)) := sorry
end vector3
/-- "Curried" exists, i.e. ∃ x1 ... xn, f [x1, ..., xn] -/
def vector_ex {α : Type u_1} (k : ℕ) : (vector3 α k → Prop) → Prop :=
sorry
/-- "Curried" forall, i.e. ∀ x1 ... xn, f [x1, ..., xn] -/
def vector_all {α : Type u_1} (k : ℕ) : (vector3 α k → Prop) → Prop :=
sorry
theorem exists_vector_zero {α : Type u_1} (f : vector3 α 0 → Prop) : Exists f ↔ f vector3.nil := sorry
theorem exists_vector_succ {α : Type u_1} {n : ℕ} (f : vector3 α (Nat.succ n) → Prop) : Exists f ↔ ∃ (x : α), ∃ (v : vector3 α n), f (x :: v) := sorry
theorem vector_ex_iff_exists {α : Type u_1} {n : ℕ} (f : vector3 α n → Prop) : vector_ex n f ↔ Exists f := sorry
theorem vector_all_iff_forall {α : Type u_1} {n : ℕ} (f : vector3 α n → Prop) : vector_all n f ↔ ∀ (v : vector3 α n), f v := sorry
/-- `vector_allp p v` is equivalent to `∀ i, p (v i)`, but unfolds directly to a conjunction,
i.e. `vector_allp p [0, 1, 2] = p 0 ∧ p 1 ∧ p 2`. -/
def vector_allp {α : Type u_1} (p : α → Prop) {n : ℕ} (v : vector3 α n) :=
vector3.rec_on v True
fun (n : ℕ) (a : α) (v : vector3 α n) (IH : Prop) =>
vector3.rec_on v (p a) fun (n : ℕ) (b : α) (v' : vector3 α n) (_x : Prop) => p a ∧ IH
@[simp] theorem vector_allp_nil {α : Type u_1} (p : α → Prop) : vector_allp p vector3.nil = True :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem vector_allp_singleton {α : Type u_1} (p : α → Prop) (x : α) : vector_allp p (x :: vector3.nil) = p x :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem vector_allp_cons {α : Type u_1} (p : α → Prop) {n : ℕ} (x : α) (v : vector3 α n) : vector_allp p (x :: v) ↔ p x ∧ vector_allp p v :=
vector3.rec_on v (iff.symm (and_true (vector_allp p (x :: vector3.nil))))
fun (n : ℕ) (a : α) (v : vector3 α n) (IH : vector_allp p (x :: v) ↔ p x ∧ vector_allp p v) => iff.rfl
theorem vector_allp_iff_forall {α : Type u_1} (p : α → Prop) {n : ℕ} (v : vector3 α n) : vector_allp p v ↔ ∀ (i : fin2 n), p (v i) := sorry
theorem vector_allp.imp {α : Type u_1} {p : α → Prop} {q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ (x : α), p x → q x) {n : ℕ} {v : vector3 α n} (al : vector_allp p v) : vector_allp q v :=
iff.mpr (vector_allp_iff_forall q v) fun (i : fin2 n) => h (v i) (iff.mp (vector_allp_iff_forall p v) al i)
/-- `list_all p l` is equivalent to `∀ a ∈ l, p a`, but unfolds directly to a conjunction,
i.e. `list_all p [0, 1, 2] = p 0 ∧ p 1 ∧ p 2`. -/
@[simp] def list_all {α : Type u_1} (p : α → Prop) : List α → Prop :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem list_all_cons {α : Type u_1} (p : α → Prop) (x : α) (l : List α) : list_all p (x :: l) ↔ p x ∧ list_all p l :=
list.cases_on l (idRhs (list_all p [x] ↔ list_all p [x] ∧ True) (iff.symm (and_true (list_all p [x]))))
fun (l_hd : α) (l_tl : List α) => idRhs (list_all p (x :: l_hd :: l_tl) ↔ list_all p (x :: l_hd :: l_tl)) iff.rfl
theorem list_all_iff_forall {α : Type u_1} (p : α → Prop) (l : List α) : list_all p l ↔ ∀ (x : α), x ∈ l → p x := sorry
theorem list_all.imp {α : Type u_1} {p : α → Prop} {q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ (x : α), p x → q x) {l : List α} : list_all p l → list_all q l := sorry
@[simp] theorem list_all_map {α : Type u_1} {β : Type u_2} {p : β → Prop} (f : α → β) {l : List α} : list_all p (list.map f l) ↔ list_all (p ∘ f) l := sorry
theorem list_all_congr {α : Type u_1} {p : α → Prop} {q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ (x : α), p x ↔ q x) {l : List α} : list_all p l ↔ list_all q l :=
{ mp := list_all.imp fun (x : α) => iff.mp (h x), mpr := list_all.imp fun (x : α) => iff.mpr (h x) }
protected instance decidable_list_all {α : Type u_1} (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : List α) : Decidable (list_all p l) :=
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (list.decidable_ball (fun (x : α) => p x) l) sorry
/- poly -/
/-- A predicate asserting that a function is a multivariate integer polynomial.
(We are being a bit lazy here by allowing many representations for multiplication,
rather than only allowing monomials and addition, but the definition is equivalent
and this is easier to use.) -/
inductive is_poly {α : Sort u_1} : ((α → ℕ) → ℤ) → Prop
where
| proj : ∀ (i : α), is_poly fun (x : α → ℕ) => ↑(x i)
| const : ∀ (n : ℤ), is_poly fun (x : α → ℕ) => n
| sub : ∀ {f g : (α → ℕ) → ℤ}, is_poly f → is_poly g → is_poly fun (x : α → ℕ) => f x - g x
| mul : ∀ {f g : (α → ℕ) → ℤ}, is_poly f → is_poly g → is_poly fun (x : α → ℕ) => f x * g x
/-- The type of multivariate integer polynomials -/
def poly (α : Type u) :=
Subtype fun (f : (α → ℕ) → ℤ) => is_poly f
namespace poly
protected instance has_coe_to_fun {α : Type u} : has_coe_to_fun (poly α) :=
has_coe_to_fun.mk (fun (f : poly α) => (α → ℕ) → ℤ) fun (f : poly α) => subtype.val f
/-- The underlying function of a `poly` is a polynomial -/
theorem isp {α : Type u} (f : poly α) : is_poly ⇑f :=
subtype.property f
/-- Extensionality for `poly α` -/
theorem ext {α : Type u} {f : poly α} {g : poly α} (e : ∀ (x : α → ℕ), coe_fn f x = coe_fn g x) : f = g :=
subtype.eq (funext e)
/-- Construct a `poly` given an extensionally equivalent `poly`. -/
def subst {α : Type u} (f : poly α) (g : (α → ℕ) → ℤ) (e : ∀ (x : α → ℕ), coe_fn f x = g x) : poly α :=
{ val := g, property := sorry }
@[simp] theorem subst_eval {α : Type u} (f : poly α) (g : (α → ℕ) → ℤ) (e : ∀ (x : α → ℕ), coe_fn f x = g x) (x : α → ℕ) : coe_fn (subst f g e) x = g x :=
rfl
/-- The `i`th projection function, `x_i`. -/
def proj {α : Type u} (i : α) : poly α :=
{ val := fun (x : α → ℕ) => ↑(x i), property := is_poly.proj i }
@[simp] theorem proj_eval {α : Type u} (i : α) (x : α → ℕ) : coe_fn (proj i) x = ↑(x i) :=
rfl
/-- The constant function with value `n : ℤ`. -/
def const {α : Type u} (n : ℤ) : poly α :=
{ val := fun (x : α → ℕ) => n, property := is_poly.const n }
@[simp] theorem const_eval {α : Type u} (n : ℤ) (x : α → ℕ) : coe_fn (const n) x = n :=
rfl
/-- The zero polynomial -/
def zero {α : Type u} : poly α :=
const 0
protected instance has_zero {α : Type u} : HasZero (poly α) :=
{ zero := zero }
@[simp] theorem zero_eval {α : Type u} (x : α → ℕ) : coe_fn 0 x = 0 :=
rfl
/-- The zero polynomial -/
def one {α : Type u} : poly α :=
const 1
protected instance has_one {α : Type u} : HasOne (poly α) :=
{ one := one }
@[simp] theorem one_eval {α : Type u} (x : α → ℕ) : coe_fn 1 x = 1 :=
rfl
/-- Subtraction of polynomials -/
def sub {α : Type u} : poly α → poly α → poly α :=
sorry
protected instance has_sub {α : Type u} : Sub (poly α) :=
{ sub := sub }
@[simp] theorem sub_eval {α : Type u} (f : poly α) (g : poly α) (x : α → ℕ) : coe_fn (f - g) x = coe_fn f x - coe_fn g x := sorry
/-- Negation of a polynomial -/
def neg {α : Type u} (f : poly α) : poly α :=
0 - f
protected instance has_neg {α : Type u} : Neg (poly α) :=
{ neg := neg }
@[simp] theorem neg_eval {α : Type u} (f : poly α) (x : α → ℕ) : coe_fn (-f) x = -coe_fn f x := sorry
/-- Addition of polynomials -/
def add {α : Type u} : poly α → poly α → poly α :=
sorry
protected instance has_add {α : Type u} : Add (poly α) :=
{ add := add }
@[simp] theorem add_eval {α : Type u} (f : poly α) (g : poly α) (x : α → ℕ) : coe_fn (f + g) x = coe_fn f x + coe_fn g x := sorry
/-- Multiplication of polynomials -/
def mul {α : Type u} : poly α → poly α → poly α :=
sorry
protected instance has_mul {α : Type u} : Mul (poly α) :=
{ mul := mul }
@[simp] theorem mul_eval {α : Type u} (f : poly α) (g : poly α) (x : α → ℕ) : coe_fn (f * g) x = coe_fn f x * coe_fn g x := sorry
protected instance comm_ring {α : Type u} : comm_ring (poly α) :=
comm_ring.mk Add.add sorry 0 sorry sorry Neg.neg Sub.sub sorry sorry Mul.mul sorry 1 sorry sorry sorry sorry sorry
theorem induction {α : Type u} {C : poly α → Prop} (H1 : ∀ (i : α), C (proj i)) (H2 : ∀ (n : ℤ), C (const n)) (H3 : ∀ (f g : poly α), C f → C g → C (f - g)) (H4 : ∀ (f g : poly α), C f → C g → C (f * g)) (f : poly α) : C f := sorry
/-- The sum of squares of a list of polynomials. This is relevant for
Diophantine equations, because it means that a list of equations
can be encoded as a single equation: `x = 0 ∧ y = 0 ∧ z = 0` is
equivalent to `x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 0`. -/
def sumsq {α : Type u} : List (poly α) → poly α :=
sorry
theorem sumsq_nonneg {α : Type u} (x : α → ℕ) (l : List (poly α)) : 0 ≤ coe_fn (sumsq l) x := sorry
theorem sumsq_eq_zero {α : Type u} (x : α → ℕ) (l : List (poly α)) : coe_fn (sumsq l) x = 0 ↔ list_all (fun (a : poly α) => coe_fn a x = 0) l := sorry
/-- Map the index set of variables, replacing `x_i` with `x_(f i)`. -/
def remap {α : Type u_1} {β : Type u_2} (f : α → β) (g : poly α) : poly β :=
{ val := fun (v : β → ℕ) => coe_fn g (v ∘ f), property := sorry }
@[simp] theorem remap_eval {α : Type u_1} {β : Type u_2} (f : α → β) (g : poly α) (v : β → ℕ) : coe_fn (remap f g) v = coe_fn g (v ∘ f) :=
rfl
end poly
namespace sum
/-- combine two functions into a function on the disjoint union -/
def join {α : Type u_1} {β : Type u_2} {γ : Sort u_3} (f : α → γ) (g : β → γ) : α ⊕ β → γ :=
sum.rec f g
end sum
namespace option
/-- Functions from `option` can be combined similarly to `vector.cons` -/
def cons {α : Type u_1} {β : Sort u_2} (a : β) (v : α → β) : Option α → β :=
Option.rec a v
infixr:67 " :: " => Mathlib.option.cons
@[simp] theorem cons_head_tail {α : Type u_1} {β : Sort u_2} (v : Option α → β) : v none :: v ∘ some = v := sorry
end option
/- dioph -/
/-- A set `S ⊆ ℕ^α` is diophantine if there exists a polynomial on
`α ⊕ β` such that `v ∈ S` iff there exists `t : ℕ^β` with `p (v, t) = 0`. -/
def dioph {α : Type u} (S : set (α → ℕ)) :=
Exists fun {β : Type u} => ∃ (p : poly (α ⊕ β)), ∀ (v : α → ℕ), S v ↔ ∃ (t : β → ℕ), coe_fn p (sum.join v t) = 0
namespace dioph
theorem ext {α : Type u} {S : set (α → ℕ)} {S' : set (α → ℕ)} (d : dioph S) (H : ∀ (v : α → ℕ), S v ↔ S' v) : dioph S' :=
Eq._oldrec d ((fun (this : S = S') => this) (set.ext H))
theorem of_no_dummies {α : Type u} (S : set (α → ℕ)) (p : poly α) (h : ∀ (v : α → ℕ), S v ↔ coe_fn p v = 0) : dioph S := sorry
theorem inject_dummies_lem {α : Type u} {β : Type u} {γ : Type u} (f : β → γ) (g : γ → Option β) (inv : ∀ (x : β), g (f x) = some x) (p : poly (α ⊕ β)) (v : α → ℕ) : (∃ (t : β → ℕ), coe_fn p (sum.join v t) = 0) ↔
∃ (t : γ → ℕ), coe_fn (poly.remap (sum.join sum.inl (sum.inr ∘ f)) p) (sum.join v t) = 0 := sorry
theorem inject_dummies {α : Type u} {β : Type u} {γ : Type u} {S : set (α → ℕ)} (f : β → γ) (g : γ → Option β) (inv : ∀ (x : β), g (f x) = some x) (p : poly (α ⊕ β)) (h : ∀ (v : α → ℕ), S v ↔ ∃ (t : β → ℕ), coe_fn p (sum.join v t) = 0) : ∃ (q : poly (α ⊕ γ)), ∀ (v : α → ℕ), S v ↔ ∃ (t : γ → ℕ), coe_fn q (sum.join v t) = 0 :=
Exists.intro (poly.remap (sum.join sum.inl (sum.inr ∘ f)) p)
fun (v : α → ℕ) => iff.trans (h v) (inject_dummies_lem f g inv p v)
theorem reindex_dioph {α : Type u} {β : Type u} {S : set (α → ℕ)} (d : dioph S) (f : α → β) : dioph fun (v : β → ℕ) => S (v ∘ f) := sorry
theorem dioph_list_all {α : Type u} (l : List (set (α → ℕ))) (d : list_all dioph l) : dioph fun (v : α → ℕ) => list_all (fun (S : set (α → ℕ)) => S v) l := sorry
theorem and_dioph {α : Type u} {S : set (α → ℕ)} {S' : set (α → ℕ)} (d : dioph S) (d' : dioph S') : dioph fun (v : α → ℕ) => S v ∧ S' v :=
dioph_list_all [S, S'] { left := d, right := d' }
theorem or_dioph {α : Type u} {S : set (α → ℕ)} {S' : set (α → ℕ)} (d : dioph S) (d' : dioph S') : dioph fun (v : α → ℕ) => S v ∨ S' v := sorry
/-- A partial function is Diophantine if its graph is Diophantine. -/
def dioph_pfun {α : Type u} (f : (α → ℕ) →. ℕ) :=
dioph fun (v : Option α → ℕ) => pfun.graph f (v ∘ some, v none)
/-- A function is Diophantine if its graph is Diophantine. -/
def dioph_fn {α : Type u} (f : (α → ℕ) → ℕ) :=
dioph fun (v : Option α → ℕ) => f (v ∘ some) = v none
theorem reindex_dioph_fn {α : Type u} {β : Type u} {f : (α → ℕ) → ℕ} (d : dioph_fn f) (g : α → β) : dioph_fn fun (v : β → ℕ) => f (v ∘ g) :=
reindex_dioph d (Functor.map g)
theorem ex_dioph {α : Type u} {β : Type u} {S : set (α ⊕ β → ℕ)} : dioph S → dioph fun (v : α → ℕ) => ∃ (x : β → ℕ), S (sum.join v x) := sorry
theorem ex1_dioph {α : Type u} {S : set (Option α → ℕ)} : dioph S → dioph fun (v : α → ℕ) => ∃ (x : ℕ), S (x :: v) := sorry
theorem dom_dioph {α : Type u} {f : (α → ℕ) →. ℕ} (d : dioph_pfun f) : dioph (pfun.dom f) :=
cast (congr_arg dioph (set.ext fun (v : α → ℕ) => iff.symm (pfun.dom_iff_graph f v))) (ex1_dioph d)
theorem dioph_fn_iff_pfun {α : Type u} (f : (α → ℕ) → ℕ) : dioph_fn f = dioph_pfun ↑f :=
congr_arg dioph (set.ext fun (v : Option α → ℕ) => iff.symm pfun.lift_graph)
theorem abs_poly_dioph {α : Type u} (p : poly α) : dioph_fn fun (v : α → ℕ) => int.nat_abs (coe_fn p v) :=
of_no_dummies (fun (v : Option α → ℕ) => (fun (v : α → ℕ) => int.nat_abs (coe_fn p v)) (v ∘ some) = v none)
((poly.remap some p - poly.proj none) * (poly.remap some p + poly.proj none))
fun (v : Option α → ℕ) => int.eq_nat_abs_iff_mul (coe_fn p (v ∘ some)) (v none)
theorem proj_dioph {α : Type u} (i : α) : dioph_fn fun (v : α → ℕ) => v i :=
abs_poly_dioph (poly.proj i)
theorem dioph_pfun_comp1 {α : Type u} {S : set (Option α → ℕ)} (d : dioph S) {f : (α → ℕ) →. ℕ} (df : dioph_pfun f) : dioph fun (v : α → ℕ) => ∃ (h : pfun.dom f v), S (pfun.fn f v h :: v) := sorry
theorem dioph_fn_comp1 {α : Type u} {S : set (Option α → ℕ)} (d : dioph S) {f : (α → ℕ) → ℕ} (df : dioph_fn f) : dioph fun (v : α → ℕ) => S (f v :: v) := sorry
theorem dioph_fn_vec_comp1 {n : ℕ} {S : set (vector3 ℕ (Nat.succ n))} (d : dioph S) {f : vector3 ℕ n → ℕ} (df : dioph_fn f) : dioph fun (v : vector3 ℕ n) => S (f v :: v) := sorry
theorem vec_ex1_dioph (n : ℕ) {S : set (vector3 ℕ (Nat.succ n))} (d : dioph S) : dioph fun (v : vector3 ℕ n) => ∃ (x : ℕ), S (x :: v) := sorry
theorem dioph_fn_vec {n : ℕ} (f : vector3 ℕ n → ℕ) : dioph_fn f ↔ dioph fun (v : vector3 ℕ (Nat.succ n)) => f (v ∘ fin2.fs) = v fin2.fz :=
{ mp := fun (h : dioph_fn f) => reindex_dioph h (fin2.fz :: fin2.fs),
mpr :=
fun (h : dioph fun (v : vector3 ℕ (Nat.succ n)) => f (v ∘ fin2.fs) = v fin2.fz) => reindex_dioph h (none :: some) }
theorem dioph_pfun_vec {n : ℕ} (f : vector3 ℕ n →. ℕ) : dioph_pfun f ↔ dioph fun (v : vector3 ℕ (Nat.succ n)) => pfun.graph f (v ∘ fin2.fs, v fin2.fz) := sorry
theorem dioph_fn_compn {α : Type} {n : ℕ} {S : set (α ⊕ fin2 n → ℕ)} (d : dioph S) {f : vector3 ((α → ℕ) → ℕ) n} (df : vector_allp dioph_fn f) : dioph fun (v : α → ℕ) => S (sum.join v fun (i : fin2 n) => f i v) := sorry
theorem dioph_comp {α : Type} {n : ℕ} {S : set (vector3 ℕ n)} (d : dioph S) (f : vector3 ((α → ℕ) → ℕ) n) (df : vector_allp dioph_fn f) : dioph fun (v : α → ℕ) => S fun (i : fin2 n) => f i v :=
dioph_fn_compn (reindex_dioph d sum.inr) df
theorem dioph_fn_comp {α : Type} {n : ℕ} {f : vector3 ℕ n → ℕ} (df : dioph_fn f) (g : vector3 ((α → ℕ) → ℕ) n) (dg : vector_allp dioph_fn g) : dioph_fn fun (v : α → ℕ) => f fun (i : fin2 n) => g i v := sorry
theorem proj_dioph_of_nat {n : ℕ} (m : ℕ) [fin2.is_lt m n] : dioph_fn fun (v : vector3 ℕ n) => v (fin2.of_nat' m) :=
proj_dioph (fin2.of_nat' m)
theorem const_dioph {α : Type} (n : ℕ) : dioph_fn (function.const (α → ℕ) n) :=
abs_poly_dioph (poly.const ↑n)
theorem dioph_comp2 {α : Type} {f : (α → ℕ) → ℕ} {g : (α → ℕ) → ℕ} (df : dioph_fn f) (dg : dioph_fn g) {S : ℕ → ℕ → Prop} (d : dioph fun (v : vector3 ℕ (bit0 1)) => S (v (fin2.of_nat' 0)) (v (fin2.of_nat' 1))) : dioph fun (v : α → ℕ) => S (f v) (g v) :=
dioph_comp d (f :: g :: vector3.nil) { left := df, right := dg }
theorem dioph_fn_comp2 {α : Type} {f : (α → ℕ) → ℕ} {g : (α → ℕ) → ℕ} (df : dioph_fn f) (dg : dioph_fn g) {h : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ} (d : dioph_fn fun (v : vector3 ℕ (bit0 1)) => h (v (fin2.of_nat' 0)) (v (fin2.of_nat' 1))) : dioph_fn fun (v : α → ℕ) => h (f v) (g v) :=
dioph_fn_comp d (f :: g :: vector3.nil) { left := df, right := dg }
theorem eq_dioph {α : Type} {f : (α → ℕ) → ℕ} {g : (α → ℕ) → ℕ} (df : dioph_fn f) (dg : dioph_fn g) : dioph fun (v : α → ℕ) => f v = g v := sorry
theorem add_dioph {α : Type} {f : (α → ℕ) → ℕ} {g : (α → ℕ) → ℕ} (df : dioph_fn f) (dg : dioph_fn g) : dioph_fn fun (v : α → ℕ) => f v + g v :=
dioph_fn_comp2 df dg (abs_poly_dioph (poly.proj (fin2.of_nat' 0) + poly.proj (fin2.of_nat' 1)))
theorem mul_dioph {α : Type} {f : (α → ℕ) → ℕ} {g : (α → ℕ) → ℕ} (df : dioph_fn f) (dg : dioph_fn g) : dioph_fn fun (v : α → ℕ) => f v * g v :=
dioph_fn_comp2 df dg (abs_poly_dioph (poly.proj (fin2.of_nat' 0) * poly.proj (fin2.of_nat' 1)))
theorem le_dioph {α : Type} {f : (α → ℕ) → ℕ} {g : (α → ℕ) → ℕ} (df : dioph_fn f) (dg : dioph_fn g) : dioph fun (v : α → ℕ) => f v ≤ g v := sorry
theorem lt_dioph {α : Type} {f : (α → ℕ) → ℕ} {g : (α → ℕ) → ℕ} (df : dioph_fn f) (dg : dioph_fn g) : dioph fun (v : α → ℕ) => f v < g v :=
le_dioph (add_dioph df (const_dioph 1)) dg
theorem ne_dioph {α : Type} {f : (α → ℕ) → ℕ} {g : (α → ℕ) → ℕ} (df : dioph_fn f) (dg : dioph_fn g) : dioph fun (v : α → ℕ) => f v ≠ g v :=
ext (or_dioph (lt_dioph df dg) (lt_dioph dg df)) fun (v : α → ℕ) => iff.symm ne_iff_lt_or_gt
theorem sub_dioph {α : Type} {f : (α → ℕ) → ℕ} {g : (α → ℕ) → ℕ} (df : dioph_fn f) (dg : dioph_fn g) : dioph_fn fun (v : α → ℕ) => f v - g v := sorry
theorem dvd_dioph {α : Type} {f : (α → ℕ) → ℕ} {g : (α → ℕ) → ℕ} (df : dioph_fn f) (dg : dioph_fn g) : dioph fun (v : α → ℕ) => f v ∣ g v := sorry
theorem mod_dioph {α : Type} {f : (α → ℕ) → ℕ} {g : (α → ℕ) → ℕ} (df : dioph_fn f) (dg : dioph_fn g) : dioph_fn fun (v : α → ℕ) => f v % g v := sorry
theorem modeq_dioph {α : Type} {f : (α → ℕ) → ℕ} {g : (α → ℕ) → ℕ} (df : dioph_fn f) (dg : dioph_fn g) {h : (α → ℕ) → ℕ} (dh : dioph_fn h) : dioph fun (v : α → ℕ) => nat.modeq (h v) (f v) (g v) :=
eq_dioph (mod_dioph df dh) (mod_dioph dg dh)
theorem div_dioph {α : Type} {f : (α → ℕ) → ℕ} {g : (α → ℕ) → ℕ} (df : dioph_fn f) (dg : dioph_fn g) : dioph_fn fun (v : α → ℕ) => f v / g v := sorry
theorem pell_dioph : dioph
fun (v : vector3 ℕ (bit0 (bit0 1))) =>
∃ (h : 1 < v (fin2.of_nat' 0)),
pell.xn h (v (fin2.of_nat' 1)) = v (fin2.of_nat' (bit0 1)) ∧
pell.yn h (v (fin2.of_nat' 1)) = v (fin2.of_nat' (bit1 1)) := sorry
theorem xn_dioph : dioph_pfun
fun (v : vector3 ℕ (bit0 1)) =>
roption.mk (1 < v (fin2.of_nat' 0)) fun (h : 1 < v (fin2.of_nat' 0)) => pell.xn h (v (fin2.of_nat' 1)) := sorry
theorem pow_dioph {α : Type} {f : (α → ℕ) → ℕ} {g : (α → ℕ) → ℕ} (df : dioph_fn f) (dg : dioph_fn g) : dioph_fn fun (v : α → ℕ) => f v ^ g v := sorry
|
fe7dbc23f5e2ef1fcd318babcf2cc7a3cf50c8ce | 30b012bb72d640ec30c8fdd4c45fdfa67beb012c | /algebra/pi_instances.lean | be69235c017fd746a17e5e90c410ee0c9eda8a84 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kckennylau/mathlib | 21fb810b701b10d6606d9002a4004f7672262e83 | 47b3477e20ffb5a06588dd3abb01fe0fe3205646 | refs/heads/master | 1,634,976,409,281 | 1,542,042,832,000 | 1,542,319,733,000 | 109,560,458 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,542,369,208,000 | 1,509,867,494,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 15,016 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon, Patrick Massot
Pi instances for algebraic structures.
-/
import order.basic
import algebra.module algebra.group
import data.finset
import tactic.pi_instances
namespace pi
universes u v
variable {I : Type u} -- The indexing type
variable {f : I → Type v} -- The family of types already equiped with instances
variables (x y : Π i, f i) (i : I)
instance has_zero [∀ i, has_zero $ f i] : has_zero (Π i : I, f i) := ⟨λ i, 0⟩
@[simp] lemma zero_apply [∀ i, has_zero $ f i] : (0 : Π i, f i) i = 0 := rfl
instance has_one [∀ i, has_one $ f i] : has_one (Π i : I, f i) := ⟨λ i, 1⟩
@[simp] lemma one_apply [∀ i, has_one $ f i] : (1 : Π i, f i) i = 1 := rfl
attribute [to_additive pi.has_zero] pi.has_one
attribute [to_additive pi.zero_apply] pi.one_apply
instance has_add [∀ i, has_add $ f i] : has_add (Π i : I, f i) := ⟨λ x y, λ i, x i + y i⟩
@[simp] lemma add_apply [∀ i, has_add $ f i] : (x + y) i = x i + y i := rfl
instance has_mul [∀ i, has_mul $ f i] : has_mul (Π i : I, f i) := ⟨λ x y, λ i, x i * y i⟩
@[simp] lemma mul_apply [∀ i, has_mul $ f i] : (x * y) i = x i * y i := rfl
attribute [to_additive pi.has_add] pi.has_mul
attribute [to_additive pi.add_apply] pi.mul_apply
instance has_inv [∀ i, has_inv $ f i] : has_inv (Π i : I, f i) := ⟨λ x, λ i, (x i)⁻¹⟩
@[simp] lemma inv_apply [∀ i, has_inv $ f i] : x⁻¹ i = (x i)⁻¹ := rfl
instance has_neg [∀ i, has_neg $ f i] : has_neg (Π i : I, f i) := ⟨λ x, λ i, -(x i)⟩
@[simp] lemma neg_apply [∀ i, has_neg $ f i] : (-x) i = -x i := rfl
attribute [to_additive pi.has_neg] pi.has_inv
attribute [to_additive pi.neg_apply] pi.inv_apply
instance has_scalar {α : Type*} [∀ i, has_scalar α $ f i] : has_scalar α (Π i : I, f i) := ⟨λ s x, λ i, s • (x i)⟩
@[simp] lemma smul_apply {α : Type*} [∀ i, has_scalar α $ f i] (s : α) : (s • x) i = s • x i := rfl
instance semigroup [∀ i, semigroup $ f i] : semigroup (Π i : I, f i) := by pi_instance
instance comm_semigroup [∀ i, comm_semigroup $ f i] : comm_semigroup (Π i : I, f i) := by pi_instance
instance monoid [∀ i, monoid $ f i] : monoid (Π i : I, f i) := by pi_instance
instance comm_monoid [∀ i, comm_monoid $ f i] : comm_monoid (Π i : I, f i) := by pi_instance
instance group [∀ i, group $ f i] : group (Π i : I, f i) := by pi_instance
instance comm_group [∀ i, comm_group $ f i] : comm_group (Π i : I, f i) := by pi_instance
instance add_semigroup [∀ i, add_semigroup $ f i] : add_semigroup (Π i : I, f i) := by pi_instance
instance add_comm_semigroup [∀ i, add_comm_semigroup $ f i] : add_comm_semigroup (Π i : I, f i) := by pi_instance
instance add_monoid [∀ i, add_monoid $ f i] : add_monoid (Π i : I, f i) := by pi_instance
instance add_comm_monoid [∀ i, add_comm_monoid $ f i] : add_comm_monoid (Π i : I, f i) := by pi_instance
instance add_group [∀ i, add_group $ f i] : add_group (Π i : I, f i) := by pi_instance
instance add_comm_group [∀ i, add_comm_group $ f i] : add_comm_group (Π i : I, f i) := by pi_instance
instance ring [∀ i, ring $ f i] : ring (Π i : I, f i) := by pi_instance
instance comm_ring [∀ i, comm_ring $ f i] : comm_ring (Π i : I, f i) := by pi_instance
instance semimodule (α) {r : semiring α} [∀ i, add_comm_monoid $ f i] [∀ i, semimodule α $ f i] : semimodule α (Π i : I, f i) := by pi_instance
instance module (α) {r : ring α} [∀ i, add_comm_group $ f i] [∀ i, module α $ f i] : module α (Π i : I, f i) := {..pi.semimodule α}
instance vector_space (α) {r : discrete_field α} [∀ i, add_comm_group $ f i] [∀ i, vector_space α $ f i] : vector_space α (Π i : I, f i) := {..pi.module α}
instance left_cancel_semigroup [∀ i, left_cancel_semigroup $ f i] : left_cancel_semigroup (Π i : I, f i) :=
by pi_instance
instance add_left_cancel_semigroup [∀ i, add_left_cancel_semigroup $ f i] : add_left_cancel_semigroup (Π i : I, f i) :=
by pi_instance
instance right_cancel_semigroup [∀ i, right_cancel_semigroup $ f i] : right_cancel_semigroup (Π i : I, f i) :=
by pi_instance
instance add_right_cancel_semigroup [∀ i, add_right_cancel_semigroup $ f i] : add_right_cancel_semigroup (Π i : I, f i) :=
by pi_instance
instance ordered_cancel_comm_monoid [∀ i, ordered_cancel_comm_monoid $ f i] : ordered_cancel_comm_monoid (Π i : I, f i) :=
by pi_instance
attribute [to_additive pi.add_semigroup] pi.semigroup
attribute [to_additive pi.add_comm_semigroup] pi.comm_semigroup
attribute [to_additive pi.add_monoid] pi.monoid
attribute [to_additive pi.add_comm_monoid] pi.comm_monoid
attribute [to_additive pi.add_group] pi.group
attribute [to_additive pi.add_comm_group] pi.comm_group
attribute [to_additive pi.add_left_cancel_semigroup] pi.left_cancel_semigroup
attribute [to_additive pi.add_right_cancel_semigroup] pi.right_cancel_semigroup
@[to_additive pi.list_sum_apply]
lemma list_prod_apply {α : Type*} {β} [monoid β] (a : α) :
∀ (l : list (α → β)), l.prod a = (l.map (λf:α → β, f a)).prod
| [] := rfl
| (f :: l) := by simp [mul_apply f l.prod a, list_prod_apply l]
@[to_additive pi.multiset_sum_apply]
lemma multiset_prod_apply {α : Type*} {β} [comm_monoid β] (a : α) (s : multiset (α → β)) :
s.prod a = (s.map (λf:α → β, f a)).prod :=
quotient.induction_on s $ assume l, begin simp [list_prod_apply a l] end
@[to_additive pi.finset_sum_apply]
lemma finset_prod_apply {α : Type*} {β γ} [comm_monoid β] (a : α) (s : finset γ) (g : γ → α → β) :
s.prod g a = s.prod (λc, g c a) :=
show (s.val.map g).prod a = (s.val.map (λc, g c a)).prod,
by rw [multiset_prod_apply, multiset.map_map]
end pi
namespace prod
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*} {p q : α × β}
instance [has_add α] [has_add β] : has_add (α × β) :=
⟨λp q, (p.1 + q.1, p.2 + q.2)⟩
@[to_additive prod.has_add]
instance [has_mul α] [has_mul β] : has_mul (α × β) :=
⟨λp q, (p.1 * q.1, p.2 * q.2)⟩
@[simp, to_additive prod.fst_add]
lemma fst_mul [has_mul α] [has_mul β] : (p * q).1 = p.1 * q.1 := rfl
@[simp, to_additive prod.snd_add]
lemma snd_mul [has_mul α] [has_mul β] : (p * q).2 = p.2 * q.2 := rfl
@[simp, to_additive prod.mk_add_mk]
lemma mk_mul_mk [has_mul α] [has_mul β] (a₁ a₂ : α) (b₁ b₂ : β) :
(a₁, b₁) * (a₂, b₂) = (a₁ * a₂, b₁ * b₂) := rfl
instance [has_zero α] [has_zero β] : has_zero (α × β) := ⟨(0, 0)⟩
@[to_additive prod.has_zero]
instance [has_one α] [has_one β] : has_one (α × β) := ⟨(1, 1)⟩
@[simp, to_additive prod.fst_zero]
lemma fst_one [has_one α] [has_one β] : (1 : α × β).1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp, to_additive prod.snd_zero]
lemma snd_one [has_one α] [has_one β] : (1 : α × β).2 = 1 := rfl
@[to_additive prod.zero_eq_mk]
lemma one_eq_mk [has_one α] [has_one β] : (1 : α × β) = (1, 1) := rfl
instance [has_neg α] [has_neg β] : has_neg (α × β) := ⟨λp, (- p.1, - p.2)⟩
@[to_additive prod.has_neg]
instance [has_inv α] [has_inv β] : has_inv (α × β) := ⟨λp, (p.1⁻¹, p.2⁻¹)⟩
@[simp, to_additive prod.fst_neg]
lemma fst_inv [has_inv α] [has_inv β] : (p⁻¹).1 = (p.1)⁻¹ := rfl
@[simp, to_additive prod.snd_neg]
lemma snd_inv [has_inv α] [has_inv β] : (p⁻¹).2 = (p.2)⁻¹ := rfl
@[to_additive prod.neg_mk]
lemma inv_mk [has_inv α] [has_inv β] (a : α) (b : β) : (a, b)⁻¹ = (a⁻¹, b⁻¹) := rfl
instance [add_semigroup α] [add_semigroup β] : add_semigroup (α × β) :=
{ add_assoc := assume a b c, mk.inj_iff.mpr ⟨add_assoc _ _ _, add_assoc _ _ _⟩,
.. prod.has_add }
@[to_additive prod.add_semigroup]
instance [semigroup α] [semigroup β] : semigroup (α × β) :=
{ mul_assoc := assume a b c, mk.inj_iff.mpr ⟨mul_assoc _ _ _, mul_assoc _ _ _⟩,
.. prod.has_mul }
instance [add_monoid α] [add_monoid β] : add_monoid (α × β) :=
{ zero_add := assume a, prod.rec_on a $ λa b, mk.inj_iff.mpr ⟨zero_add _, zero_add _⟩,
add_zero := assume a, prod.rec_on a $ λa b, mk.inj_iff.mpr ⟨add_zero _, add_zero _⟩,
.. prod.add_semigroup, .. prod.has_zero }
@[to_additive prod.add_monoid]
instance [monoid α] [monoid β] : monoid (α × β) :=
{ one_mul := assume a, prod.rec_on a $ λa b, mk.inj_iff.mpr ⟨one_mul _, one_mul _⟩,
mul_one := assume a, prod.rec_on a $ λa b, mk.inj_iff.mpr ⟨mul_one _, mul_one _⟩,
.. prod.semigroup, .. prod.has_one }
instance [add_group α] [add_group β] : add_group (α × β) :=
{ add_left_neg := assume a, mk.inj_iff.mpr ⟨add_left_neg _, add_left_neg _⟩,
.. prod.add_monoid, .. prod.has_neg }
@[to_additive prod.add_group]
instance [group α] [group β] : group (α × β) :=
{ mul_left_inv := assume a, mk.inj_iff.mpr ⟨mul_left_inv _, mul_left_inv _⟩,
.. prod.monoid, .. prod.has_inv }
instance [add_comm_semigroup α] [add_comm_semigroup β] : add_comm_semigroup (α × β) :=
{ add_comm := assume a b, mk.inj_iff.mpr ⟨add_comm _ _, add_comm _ _⟩,
.. prod.add_semigroup }
@[to_additive prod.add_comm_semigroup]
instance [comm_semigroup α] [comm_semigroup β] : comm_semigroup (α × β) :=
{ mul_comm := assume a b, mk.inj_iff.mpr ⟨mul_comm _ _, mul_comm _ _⟩,
.. prod.semigroup }
instance [add_comm_monoid α] [add_comm_monoid β] : add_comm_monoid (α × β) :=
{ .. prod.add_comm_semigroup, .. prod.add_monoid }
@[to_additive prod.add_comm_monoid]
instance [comm_monoid α] [comm_monoid β] : comm_monoid (α × β) :=
{ .. prod.comm_semigroup, .. prod.monoid }
instance [add_comm_group α] [add_comm_group β] : add_comm_group (α × β) :=
{ .. prod.add_comm_semigroup, .. prod.add_group }
@[to_additive prod.add_comm_group]
instance [comm_group α] [comm_group β] : comm_group (α × β) :=
{ .. prod.comm_semigroup, .. prod.group }
@[to_additive prod.fst_sum]
lemma fst_prod [comm_monoid α] [comm_monoid β] {t : finset γ} {f : γ → α × β} :
(t.prod f).1 = t.prod (λc, (f c).1) :=
(finset.prod_hom prod.fst (show (1:α×β).1 = 1, from rfl) $ assume x y, rfl).symm
@[to_additive prod.snd_sum]
lemma snd_prod [comm_monoid α] [comm_monoid β] {t : finset γ} {f : γ → α × β} :
(t.prod f).2 = t.prod (λc, (f c).2) :=
(finset.prod_hom prod.snd (show (1:α×β).2 = 1, from rfl) $ assume x y, rfl).symm
instance [semiring α] [semiring β] : semiring (α × β) :=
{ zero_mul := λ a, mk.inj_iff.mpr ⟨zero_mul _, zero_mul _⟩,
mul_zero := λ a, mk.inj_iff.mpr ⟨mul_zero _, mul_zero _⟩,
left_distrib := λ a b c, mk.inj_iff.mpr ⟨left_distrib _ _ _, left_distrib _ _ _⟩,
right_distrib := λ a b c, mk.inj_iff.mpr ⟨right_distrib _ _ _, right_distrib _ _ _⟩,
..prod.add_comm_monoid, ..prod.monoid }
instance [ring α] [ring β] : ring (α × β) :=
{ ..prod.add_comm_group, ..prod.semiring }
instance [comm_ring α] [comm_ring β] : comm_ring (α × β) :=
{ ..prod.ring, ..prod.comm_monoid }
instance [nonzero_comm_ring α] [comm_ring β] : nonzero_comm_ring (α × β) :=
{ zero_ne_one := mt (congr_arg prod.fst) zero_ne_one,
..prod.comm_ring }
/-- Left injection function for the inner product
From a vector space (and also group and module) perspective the product is the same as the sum of
two vector spaces. `inl` and `inr` provide the corresponding injection functions.
-/
def inl [has_zero β] (a : α) : α × β := (a, 0)
/-- Right injection function for the inner product -/
def inr [has_zero α] (b : β) : α × β := (0, b)
lemma injective_inl [has_zero β] : function.injective (inl : α → α × β) :=
assume x y h, (prod.mk.inj_iff.mp h).1
lemma injective_inr [has_zero α] : function.injective (inr : β → α × β) :=
assume x y h, (prod.mk.inj_iff.mp h).2
@[simp] lemma inl_eq_inl [has_zero β] {a₁ a₂ : α} : (inl a₁ : α × β) = inl a₂ ↔ a₁ = a₂ :=
iff.intro (assume h, injective_inl h) (assume h, h ▸ rfl)
@[simp] lemma inr_eq_inr [has_zero α] {b₁ b₂ : β} : (inr b₁ : α × β) = inr b₂ ↔ b₁ = b₂ :=
iff.intro (assume h, injective_inr h) (assume h, h ▸ rfl)
@[simp] lemma inl_eq_inr [has_zero α] [has_zero β] {a : α} {b : β} :
inl a = inr b ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
by constructor; simp [inl, inr] {contextual := tt}
@[simp] lemma inr_eq_inl [has_zero α] [has_zero β] {a : α} {b : β} :
inr b = inl a ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
by constructor; simp [inl, inr] {contextual := tt}
@[simp] lemma fst_inl [has_zero β] (a : α) : (inl a : α × β).1 = a := rfl
@[simp] lemma snd_inl [has_zero β] (a : α) : (inl a : α × β).2 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma fst_inr [has_zero α] (b : β) : (inr b : α × β).1 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma snd_inr [has_zero α] (b : β) : (inr b : α × β).2 = b := rfl
instance [has_scalar α β] [has_scalar α γ] : has_scalar α (β × γ) := ⟨λa p, (a • p.1, a • p.2)⟩
@[simp] theorem smul_fst [has_scalar α β] [has_scalar α γ]
(a : α) (x : β × γ) : (a • x).1 = a • x.1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem smul_snd [has_scalar α β] [has_scalar α γ]
(a : α) (x : β × γ) : (a • x).2 = a • x.2 := rfl
@[simp] theorem smul_mk [has_scalar α β] [has_scalar α γ]
(a : α) (b : β) (c : γ) : a • (b, c) = (a • b, a • c) := rfl
instance {r : semiring α} [add_comm_monoid β] [add_comm_monoid γ]
[semimodule α β] [semimodule α γ] : semimodule α (β × γ) :=
{ smul_add := assume a p₁ p₂, mk.inj_iff.mpr ⟨smul_add _ _ _, smul_add _ _ _⟩,
add_smul := assume a p₁ p₂, mk.inj_iff.mpr ⟨add_smul _ _ _, add_smul _ _ _⟩,
mul_smul := assume a₁ a₂ p, mk.inj_iff.mpr ⟨mul_smul _ _ _, mul_smul _ _ _⟩,
one_smul := assume ⟨b, c⟩, mk.inj_iff.mpr ⟨one_smul _, one_smul _⟩,
zero_smul := assume ⟨b, c⟩, mk.inj_iff.mpr ⟨zero_smul _, zero_smul _⟩,
smul_zero := assume a, mk.inj_iff.mpr ⟨smul_zero _, smul_zero _⟩,
.. prod.has_scalar }
instance {r : ring α} [add_comm_group β] [add_comm_group γ]
[module α β] [module α γ] : module α (β × γ) := {}
instance {r : discrete_field α} [add_comm_group β] [add_comm_group γ]
[vector_space α β] [vector_space α γ] : vector_space α (β × γ) := {}
end prod
namespace finset
@[to_additive finset.prod_mk_sum]
lemma prod_mk_prod {α β γ : Type*} [comm_monoid α] [comm_monoid β] (s : finset γ)
(f : γ → α) (g : γ → β) : (s.prod f, s.prod g) = s.prod (λ x, (f x, g x)) :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq γ; exact
finset.induction_on s rfl (by simp [prod.ext_iff] {contextual := tt})
end finset
|
056c778b6d3920611196eb245ecab706d1f11ac8 | 9be442d9ec2fcf442516ed6e9e1660aa9071b7bd | /src/Lean/Meta/Basic.lean | c08f136ca8fe7a259e54fbdec09a2f520e6e66d8 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | EdAyers/lean4 | 57ac632d6b0789cb91fab2170e8c9e40441221bd | 37ba0df5841bde51dbc2329da81ac23d4f6a4de4 | refs/heads/master | 1,676,463,245,298 | 1,660,619,433,000 | 1,660,619,433,000 | 183,433,437 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,657,612,672,000 | 1,556,196,574,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 73,186 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Data.LOption
import Lean.Environment
import Lean.Class
import Lean.ReducibilityAttrs
import Lean.Util.Trace
import Lean.Util.RecDepth
import Lean.Util.PPExt
import Lean.Util.ReplaceExpr
import Lean.Util.OccursCheck
import Lean.Util.MonadBacktrack
import Lean.Compiler.InlineAttrs
import Lean.Meta.TransparencyMode
import Lean.Meta.DiscrTreeTypes
import Lean.Eval
import Lean.CoreM
/-!
This module provides four (mutually dependent) goodies that are needed for building the elaborator and tactic frameworks.
1- Weak head normal form computation with support for metavariables and transparency modes.
2- Definitionally equality checking with support for metavariables (aka unification modulo definitional equality).
3- Type inference.
4- Type class resolution.
They are packed into the MetaM monad.
-/
namespace Lean.Meta
builtin_initialize isDefEqStuckExceptionId : InternalExceptionId ← registerInternalExceptionId `isDefEqStuck
/--
Configuration flags for the `MetaM` monad.
Many of them are used to control the `isDefEq` function that checks whether two terms are definitionally equal or not.
Recall that when `isDefEq` is trying to check whether
`?m@C a₁ ... aₙ` and `t` are definitionally equal (`?m@C a₁ ... aₙ =?= t`), where
`?m@C` as a shorthand for `C |- ?m : t` where `t` is the type of `?m`.
We solve it using the assignment `?m := fun a₁ ... aₙ => t` if
1) `a₁ ... aₙ` are pairwise distinct free variables that are *not* let-variables.
2) `a₁ ... aₙ` are not in `C`
3) `t` only contains free variables in `C` and/or `{a₁, ..., aₙ}`
4) For every metavariable `?m'@C'` occurring in `t`, `C'` is a subprefix of `C`
5) `?m` does not occur in `t`
-/
structure Config where
/--
If `foApprox` is set to true, and some `aᵢ` is not a free variable,
then we use first-order unification
```
?m a_1 ... a_i a_{i+1} ... a_{i+k} =?= f b_1 ... b_k
```
reduces to
```
?m a_1 ... a_i =?= f
a_{i+1} =?= b_1
...
a_{i+k} =?= b_k
```
-/
foApprox : Bool := false
/--
When `ctxApprox` is set to true, we relax condition 4, by creating an
auxiliary metavariable `?n'` with a smaller context than `?m'`.
-/
ctxApprox : Bool := false
/--
When `quasiPatternApprox` is set to true, we ignore condition 2.
-/
quasiPatternApprox : Bool := false
/-- When `constApprox` is set to true,
we solve `?m t =?= c` using
`?m := fun _ => c`
when `?m t` is not a higher-order pattern and `c` is not an application as -/
constApprox : Bool := false
/--
When the following flag is set,
`isDefEq` throws the exeption `Exeption.isDefEqStuck`
whenever it encounters a constraint `?m ... =?= t` where
`?m` is read only.
This feature is useful for type class resolution where
we may want to notify the caller that the TC problem may be solveable
later after it assigns `?m`. -/
isDefEqStuckEx : Bool := false
/--
Controls which definitions and theorems can be unfolded by `isDefEq` and `whnf`.
-/
transparency : TransparencyMode := TransparencyMode.default
/-- If zetaNonDep == false, then non dependent let-decls are not zeta expanded. -/
zetaNonDep : Bool := true
/-- When `trackZeta == true`, we store zetaFVarIds all free variables that have been zeta-expanded. -/
trackZeta : Bool := false
/-- Enable/disable the unification hints feature. -/
unificationHints : Bool := true
/-- Enables proof irrelevance at `isDefEq` -/
proofIrrelevance : Bool := true
/-- By default synthetic opaque metavariables are not assigned by `isDefEq`. Motivation: we want to make
sure typing constraints resolved during elaboration should not "fill" holes that are supposed to be filled using tactics.
However, this restriction is too restrictive for tactics such as `exact t`. When elaborating `t`, we dot not fill
named holes when solving typing constraints or TC resolution. But, we ignore the restriction when we try to unify
the type of `t` with the goal target type. We claim this is not a hack and is defensible behavior because
this last unification step is not really part of the term elaboration. -/
assignSyntheticOpaque : Bool := false
/-- When `ignoreLevelDepth` is `false`, only universe level metavariables with depth == metavariable context depth
can be assigned.
We used to have `ignoreLevelDepth == false` always, but this setting produced counterintuitive behavior in a few
cases. Recall that universe levels are often ignored by users, they may not even be aware they exist.
We still use this restriction for regular metavariables. See discussion at the beginning of `MetavarContext.lean`.
We claim it is reasonable to ignore this restriction for universe metavariables because their values are often
contrained by the terms is instances and simp theorems.
TODO: we should delete this configuration option and the method `isReadOnlyLevelMVar` after we have more tests.
-/
ignoreLevelMVarDepth : Bool := true
/-- Enable/Disable support for offset constraints such as `?x + 1 =?= e` -/
offsetCnstrs : Bool := true
/-- Eta for structures configuration mode. -/
etaStruct : EtaStructMode := .all
/--
Function parameter information cache.
-/
structure ParamInfo where
/-- The binder annotation for the parameter. -/
binderInfo : BinderInfo := BinderInfo.default
/-- `hasFwdDeps` is true if there is another parameter whose type depends on this one. -/
hasFwdDeps : Bool := false
/-- `backDeps` contains the backwards dependencies. That is, the (0-indexed) position of previous parameters that this one depends on. -/
backDeps : Array Nat := #[]
/-- `isProp` is true if the parameter is always a proposition. -/
isProp : Bool := false
/--
`isDecInst` is true if the parameter's type is of the form `Decidable ...`.
This information affects the generation of congruence theorems.
-/
isDecInst : Bool := false
/--
`higherOrderOutParam` is true if this parameter is a higher-order output parameter
of local instance.
Example:
```
getElem :
{cont : Type u_1} → {idx : Type u_2} → {elem : Type u_3} →
{dom : cont → idx → Prop} → [self : GetElem cont idx elem dom] →
(xs : cont) → (i : idx) → dom xs i → elem
```
This flag is true for the parameter `dom` because it is output parameter of
`[self : GetElem cont idx elem dom]`
-/
higherOrderOutParam : Bool := false
/--
`dependsOnHigherOrderOutParam` is true if the type of this parameter depends on
the higher-order output parameter of a previous local instance.
Example:
```
getElem :
{cont : Type u_1} → {idx : Type u_2} → {elem : Type u_3} →
{dom : cont → idx → Prop} → [self : GetElem cont idx elem dom] →
(xs : cont) → (i : idx) → dom xs i → elem
```
This flag is true for the parameter with type `dom xs i` since `dom` is an output parameter
of the instance `[self : GetElem cont idx elem dom]`
-/
dependsOnHigherOrderOutParam : Bool := false
deriving Inhabited
def ParamInfo.isImplicit (p : ParamInfo) : Bool :=
p.binderInfo == BinderInfo.implicit
def ParamInfo.isInstImplicit (p : ParamInfo) : Bool :=
p.binderInfo == BinderInfo.instImplicit
def ParamInfo.isStrictImplicit (p : ParamInfo) : Bool :=
p.binderInfo == BinderInfo.strictImplicit
def ParamInfo.isExplicit (p : ParamInfo) : Bool :=
p.binderInfo == BinderInfo.default || p.binderInfo == BinderInfo.auxDecl
/--
Function information cache. See `ParamInfo`.
-/
structure FunInfo where
/-- Parameter information cache. -/
paramInfo : Array ParamInfo := #[]
/--
`resultDeps` contains the function result type backwards dependencies.
That is, the (0-indexed) position of parameters that the result type depends on.
-/
resultDeps : Array Nat := #[]
/--
Key for the function information cache.
-/
structure InfoCacheKey where
/-- The transparency mode used to compute the `FunInfo`. -/
transparency : TransparencyMode
/-- The function being cached information about. It is quite often an `Expr.const`. -/
expr : Expr
/--
`nargs? = some n` if the cached information was computed assuming the function has arity `n`.
If `nargs? = none`, then the cache information consumed the arrow type as much as possible
unsing the current transparency setting.
X-/
nargs? : Option Nat
deriving Inhabited, BEq
namespace InfoCacheKey
instance : Hashable InfoCacheKey :=
⟨fun ⟨transparency, expr, nargs⟩ => mixHash (hash transparency) <| mixHash (hash expr) (hash nargs)⟩
end InfoCacheKey
open Std (PersistentArray PersistentHashMap)
abbrev SynthInstanceCache := PersistentHashMap Expr (Option Expr)
abbrev InferTypeCache := PersistentExprStructMap Expr
abbrev FunInfoCache := PersistentHashMap InfoCacheKey FunInfo
abbrev WhnfCache := PersistentExprStructMap Expr
/--
A mapping `(s, t) ↦ isDefEq s t`.
TODO: consider more efficient representations (e.g., a proper set) and caching policies (e.g., imperfect cache).
We should also investigate the impact on memory consumption. -/
abbrev DefEqCache := PersistentHashMap (Expr × Expr) Bool
/--
Cache datastructures for type inference, type class resolution, whnf, and definitional equality.
-/
structure Cache where
inferType : InferTypeCache := {}
funInfo : FunInfoCache := {}
synthInstance : SynthInstanceCache := {}
whnfDefault : WhnfCache := {} -- cache for closed terms and `TransparencyMode.default`
whnfAll : WhnfCache := {} -- cache for closed terms and `TransparencyMode.all`
defEq : DefEqCache := {}
deriving Inhabited
/--
"Context" for a postponed universe constraint.
`lhs` and `rhs` are the surrounding `isDefEq` call when the postponed constraint was created.
-/
structure DefEqContext where
lhs : Expr
rhs : Expr
lctx : LocalContext
localInstances : LocalInstances
/--
Auxiliary structure for representing postponed universe constraints.
Remark: the fields `ref` and `rootDefEq?` are used for error message generation only.
Remark: we may consider improving the error message generation in the future.
-/
structure PostponedEntry where
/-- We save the `ref` at entry creation time. This is used for reporting errors back to the user. -/
ref : Syntax
lhs : Level
rhs : Level
/-- Context for the surrounding `isDefEq` call when entry was created. -/
ctx? : Option DefEqContext
deriving Inhabited
/--
`MetaM` monad state.
-/
structure State where
mctx : MetavarContext := {}
cache : Cache := {}
/-- When `trackZeta == true`, then any let-decl free variable that is zeta expansion performed by `MetaM` is stored in `zetaFVarIds`. -/
zetaFVarIds : FVarIdSet := {}
/-- Array of postponed universe level constraints -/
postponed : PersistentArray PostponedEntry := {}
deriving Inhabited
/--
Backtrackable state for the `MetaM` monad.
-/
structure SavedState where
core : Core.State
meta : State
deriving Inhabited
/--
Contextual information for the `MetaM` monad.
-/
structure Context where
config : Config := {}
/-- Local context -/
lctx : LocalContext := {}
/-- Local instances in `lctx`. -/
localInstances : LocalInstances := #[]
/-- Not `none` when inside of an `isDefEq` test. See `PostponedEntry`. -/
defEqCtx? : Option DefEqContext := none
/--
Track the number of nested `synthPending` invocations. Nested invocations can happen
when the type class resolution invokes `synthPending`.
Remark: in the current implementation, `synthPending` fails if `synthPendingDepth > 0`.
We will add a configuration option if necessary. -/
synthPendingDepth : Nat := 0
/--
A predicate to control whether a constant can be unfolded or not at `whnf`.
Note that we do not cache results at `whnf` when `canUnfold?` is not `none`. -/
canUnfold? : Option (Config → ConstantInfo → CoreM Bool) := none
abbrev MetaM := ReaderT Context $ StateRefT State CoreM
-- Make the compiler generate specialized `pure`/`bind` so we do not have to optimize through the
-- whole monad stack at every use site. May eventually be covered by `deriving`.
instance : Monad MetaM := let i := inferInstanceAs (Monad MetaM); { pure := i.pure, bind := i.bind }
instance : Inhabited (MetaM α) where
default := fun _ _ => default
instance : MonadLCtx MetaM where
getLCtx := return (← read).lctx
instance : MonadMCtx MetaM where
getMCtx := return (← get).mctx
modifyMCtx f := modify fun s => { s with mctx := f s.mctx }
instance : MonadEnv MetaM where
getEnv := return (← getThe Core.State).env
modifyEnv f := do modifyThe Core.State fun s => { s with env := f s.env, cache := {} }; modify fun s => { s with cache := {} }
instance : AddMessageContext MetaM where
addMessageContext := addMessageContextFull
protected def saveState : MetaM SavedState :=
return { core := (← getThe Core.State), meta := (← get) }
/-- Restore backtrackable parts of the state. -/
def SavedState.restore (b : SavedState) : MetaM Unit := do
Core.restore b.core
modify fun s => { s with mctx := b.meta.mctx, zetaFVarIds := b.meta.zetaFVarIds, postponed := b.meta.postponed }
instance : MonadBacktrack SavedState MetaM where
saveState := Meta.saveState
restoreState s := s.restore
@[inline] def MetaM.run (x : MetaM α) (ctx : Context := {}) (s : State := {}) : CoreM (α × State) :=
x ctx |>.run s
@[inline] def MetaM.run' (x : MetaM α) (ctx : Context := {}) (s : State := {}) : CoreM α :=
Prod.fst <$> x.run ctx s
@[inline] def MetaM.toIO (x : MetaM α) (ctxCore : Core.Context) (sCore : Core.State) (ctx : Context := {}) (s : State := {}) : IO (α × Core.State × State) := do
let ((a, s), sCore) ← (x.run ctx s).toIO ctxCore sCore
pure (a, sCore, s)
instance [MetaEval α] : MetaEval (MetaM α) :=
⟨fun env opts x _ => MetaEval.eval env opts x.run' true⟩
protected def throwIsDefEqStuck : MetaM α :=
throw <| Exception.internal isDefEqStuckExceptionId
builtin_initialize
registerTraceClass `Meta
registerTraceClass `Meta.debug
export Core (instantiateTypeLevelParams instantiateValueLevelParams)
@[inline] def liftMetaM [MonadLiftT MetaM m] (x : MetaM α) : m α :=
liftM x
@[inline] def mapMetaM [MonadControlT MetaM m] [Monad m] (f : forall {α}, MetaM α → MetaM α) {α} (x : m α) : m α :=
controlAt MetaM fun runInBase => f <| runInBase x
@[inline] def map1MetaM [MonadControlT MetaM m] [Monad m] (f : forall {α}, (β → MetaM α) → MetaM α) {α} (k : β → m α) : m α :=
controlAt MetaM fun runInBase => f fun b => runInBase <| k b
@[inline] def map2MetaM [MonadControlT MetaM m] [Monad m] (f : forall {α}, (β → γ → MetaM α) → MetaM α) {α} (k : β → γ → m α) : m α :=
controlAt MetaM fun runInBase => f fun b c => runInBase <| k b c
section Methods
variable [MonadControlT MetaM n] [Monad n]
@[inline] def modifyCache (f : Cache → Cache) : MetaM Unit :=
modify fun ⟨mctx, cache, zetaFVarIds, postponed⟩ => ⟨mctx, f cache, zetaFVarIds, postponed⟩
@[inline] def modifyInferTypeCache (f : InferTypeCache → InferTypeCache) : MetaM Unit :=
modifyCache fun ⟨ic, c1, c2, c3, c4, c5⟩ => ⟨f ic, c1, c2, c3, c4, c5⟩
@[inline] def modifyDefEqCache (f : DefEqCache → DefEqCache) : MetaM Unit :=
modifyCache fun ⟨c1, c2, c3, c4, c5, defeq⟩ => ⟨c1, c2, c3, c4, c5, f defeq⟩
def getLocalInstances : MetaM LocalInstances :=
return (← read).localInstances
def getConfig : MetaM Config :=
return (← read).config
def resetZetaFVarIds : MetaM Unit :=
modify fun s => { s with zetaFVarIds := {} }
def getZetaFVarIds : MetaM FVarIdSet :=
return (← get).zetaFVarIds
/-- Return the array of postponed universe level constraints. -/
def getPostponed : MetaM (PersistentArray PostponedEntry) :=
return (← get).postponed
/-- Set the array of postponed universe level constraints. -/
def setPostponed (postponed : PersistentArray PostponedEntry) : MetaM Unit :=
modify fun s => { s with postponed := postponed }
/-- Modify the array of postponed universe level constraints. -/
@[inline] def modifyPostponed (f : PersistentArray PostponedEntry → PersistentArray PostponedEntry) : MetaM Unit :=
modify fun s => { s with postponed := f s.postponed }
/--
`useEtaStruct inductName` return `true` if we eta for structures is enabled for
for the inductive datatype `inductName`.
Recall we have three different settings: `.none` (never use it), `.all` (always use it), `.notClasses`
(enabled only for structure-like inductive types that are not classes).
The parameter `inductName` affects the result only if the current setting is `.notClasses`.
-/
def useEtaStruct (inductName : Name) : MetaM Bool := do
match (← getConfig).etaStruct with
| .none => return false
| .all => return true
| .notClasses => return !isClass (← getEnv) inductName
/-! WARNING: The following 4 constants are a hack for simulating forward declarations.
They are defined later using the `export` attribute. This is hackish because we
have to hard-code the true arity of these definitions here, and make sure the C names match.
We have used another hack based on `IO.Ref`s in the past, it was safer but less efficient. -/
/-- Reduces an expression to its Weak Head Normal Form.
This is when the topmost expression has been fully reduced,
but may contain subexpressions which have not been reduced. -/
@[extern 6 "lean_whnf"] opaque whnf : Expr → MetaM Expr
/-- Returns the inferred type of the given expression, or fails if it is not type-correct. -/
@[extern 6 "lean_infer_type"] opaque inferType : Expr → MetaM Expr
@[extern 7 "lean_is_expr_def_eq"] opaque isExprDefEqAux : Expr → Expr → MetaM Bool
@[extern 7 "lean_is_level_def_eq"] opaque isLevelDefEqAux : Level → Level → MetaM Bool
@[extern 6 "lean_synth_pending"] protected opaque synthPending : MVarId → MetaM Bool
def whnfForall (e : Expr) : MetaM Expr := do
let e' ← whnf e
if e'.isForall then pure e' else pure e
-- withIncRecDepth for a monad `n` such that `[MonadControlT MetaM n]`
protected def withIncRecDepth (x : n α) : n α :=
mapMetaM (withIncRecDepth (m := MetaM)) x
private def mkFreshExprMVarAtCore
(mvarId : MVarId) (lctx : LocalContext) (localInsts : LocalInstances) (type : Expr) (kind : MetavarKind) (userName : Name) (numScopeArgs : Nat) : MetaM Expr := do
modifyMCtx fun mctx => mctx.addExprMVarDecl mvarId userName lctx localInsts type kind numScopeArgs;
return mkMVar mvarId
def mkFreshExprMVarAt
(lctx : LocalContext) (localInsts : LocalInstances) (type : Expr)
(kind : MetavarKind := MetavarKind.natural) (userName : Name := Name.anonymous) (numScopeArgs : Nat := 0)
: MetaM Expr := do
mkFreshExprMVarAtCore (← mkFreshMVarId) lctx localInsts type kind userName numScopeArgs
def mkFreshLevelMVar : MetaM Level := do
let mvarId ← mkFreshLMVarId
modifyMCtx fun mctx => mctx.addLevelMVarDecl mvarId;
return mkLevelMVar mvarId
private def mkFreshExprMVarCore (type : Expr) (kind : MetavarKind) (userName : Name) : MetaM Expr := do
mkFreshExprMVarAt (← getLCtx) (← getLocalInstances) type kind userName
private def mkFreshExprMVarImpl (type? : Option Expr) (kind : MetavarKind) (userName : Name) : MetaM Expr :=
match type? with
| some type => mkFreshExprMVarCore type kind userName
| none => do
let u ← mkFreshLevelMVar
let type ← mkFreshExprMVarCore (mkSort u) MetavarKind.natural Name.anonymous
mkFreshExprMVarCore type kind userName
def mkFreshExprMVar (type? : Option Expr) (kind := MetavarKind.natural) (userName := Name.anonymous) : MetaM Expr :=
mkFreshExprMVarImpl type? kind userName
def mkFreshTypeMVar (kind := MetavarKind.natural) (userName := Name.anonymous) : MetaM Expr := do
let u ← mkFreshLevelMVar
mkFreshExprMVar (mkSort u) kind userName
/-- Low-level version of `MkFreshExprMVar` which allows users to create/reserve a `mvarId` using `mkFreshId`, and then later create
the metavar using this method. -/
private def mkFreshExprMVarWithIdCore (mvarId : MVarId) (type : Expr)
(kind : MetavarKind := MetavarKind.natural) (userName : Name := Name.anonymous) (numScopeArgs : Nat := 0)
: MetaM Expr := do
mkFreshExprMVarAtCore mvarId (← getLCtx) (← getLocalInstances) type kind userName numScopeArgs
def mkFreshExprMVarWithId (mvarId : MVarId) (type? : Option Expr := none) (kind : MetavarKind := MetavarKind.natural) (userName := Name.anonymous) : MetaM Expr :=
match type? with
| some type => mkFreshExprMVarWithIdCore mvarId type kind userName
| none => do
let u ← mkFreshLevelMVar
let type ← mkFreshExprMVar (mkSort u)
mkFreshExprMVarWithIdCore mvarId type kind userName
def mkFreshLevelMVars (num : Nat) : MetaM (List Level) :=
num.foldM (init := []) fun _ us =>
return (← mkFreshLevelMVar)::us
def mkFreshLevelMVarsFor (info : ConstantInfo) : MetaM (List Level) :=
mkFreshLevelMVars info.numLevelParams
/--
Create a constant with the given name and new universe metavariables.
Example: ``mkConstWithFreshMVarLevels `Monad`` returns `@Monad.{?u, ?v}`
-/
def mkConstWithFreshMVarLevels (declName : Name) : MetaM Expr := do
let info ← getConstInfo declName
return mkConst declName (← mkFreshLevelMVarsFor info)
/-- Return current transparency setting/mode. -/
def getTransparency : MetaM TransparencyMode :=
return (← getConfig).transparency
def shouldReduceAll : MetaM Bool :=
return (← getTransparency) == TransparencyMode.all
def shouldReduceReducibleOnly : MetaM Bool :=
return (← getTransparency) == TransparencyMode.reducible
/--
Return `some mvarDecl` where `mvarDecl` is `mvarId` declaration in the current metavariable context.
Return `none` if `mvarId` has no declaration in the current metavariable context.
-/
def _root_.Lean.MVarId.findDecl? (mvarId : MVarId) : MetaM (Option MetavarDecl) :=
return (← getMCtx).findDecl? mvarId
@[deprecated MVarId.findDecl?]
def findMVarDecl? (mvarId : MVarId) : MetaM (Option MetavarDecl) :=
mvarId.findDecl?
/--
Return `mvarId` declaration in the current metavariable context.
Throw an exception if `mvarId` is not declarated in the current metavariable context.
-/
def _root_.Lean.MVarId.getDecl (mvarId : MVarId) : MetaM MetavarDecl := do
match (← mvarId.findDecl?) with
| some d => pure d
| none => throwError "unknown metavariable '?{mvarId.name}'"
@[deprecated MVarId.getDecl]
def getMVarDecl (mvarId : MVarId) : MetaM MetavarDecl := do
mvarId.getDecl
/--
Return `mvarId` kind. Throw an exception if `mvarId` is not declarated in the current metavariable context.
-/
def _root_.Lean.MVarId.getKind (mvarId : MVarId) : MetaM MetavarKind :=
return (← mvarId.getDecl).kind
@[deprecated MVarId.getKind]
def getMVarDeclKind (mvarId : MVarId) : MetaM MetavarKind :=
mvarId.getKind
/-- Reture `true` if `e` is a synthetic (or synthetic opaque) metavariable -/
def isSyntheticMVar (e : Expr) : MetaM Bool := do
if e.isMVar then
return (← e.mvarId!.getKind) matches .synthetic | .syntheticOpaque
else
return false
/--
Set `mvarId` kind in the current metavariable context.
-/
def _root_.Lean.MVarId.setKind (mvarId : MVarId) (kind : MetavarKind) : MetaM Unit :=
modifyMCtx fun mctx => mctx.setMVarKind mvarId kind
@[deprecated MVarId.setKind]
def setMVarKind (mvarId : MVarId) (kind : MetavarKind) : MetaM Unit :=
mvarId.setKind kind
/-- Update the type of the given metavariable. This function assumes the new type is
definitionally equal to the current one -/
def _root_.Lean.MVarId.setType (mvarId : MVarId) (type : Expr) : MetaM Unit := do
modifyMCtx fun mctx => mctx.setMVarType mvarId type
@[deprecated MVarId.setType]
def setMVarType (mvarId : MVarId) (type : Expr) : MetaM Unit := do
mvarId.setType type
/--
Return true if the given metavariable is "read-only".
That is, its `depth` is different from the current metavariable context depth.
-/
def _root_.Lean.MVarId.isReadOnly (mvarId : MVarId) : MetaM Bool := do
return (← mvarId.getDecl).depth != (← getMCtx).depth
@[deprecated MVarId.isReadOnly]
def isReadOnlyExprMVar (mvarId : MVarId) : MetaM Bool := do
mvarId.isReadOnly
/--
Return true if `mvarId.isReadOnly` return true or if `mvarId` is a synthetic opaque metavariable.
Recall `isDefEq` will not assign a value to `mvarId` if `mvarId.isReadOnlyOrSyntheticOpaque`.
-/
def _root_.Lean.MVarId.isReadOnlyOrSyntheticOpaque (mvarId : MVarId) : MetaM Bool := do
let mvarDecl ← mvarId.getDecl
match mvarDecl.kind with
| MetavarKind.syntheticOpaque => return !(← getConfig).assignSyntheticOpaque
| _ => return mvarDecl.depth != (← getMCtx).depth
@[deprecated MVarId.isReadOnlyOrSyntheticOpaque]
def isReadOnlyOrSyntheticOpaqueExprMVar (mvarId : MVarId) : MetaM Bool := do
mvarId.isReadOnlyOrSyntheticOpaque
/--
Return the level of the given universe level metavariable.
-/
def _root_.Lean.LMVarId.getLevel (mvarId : LMVarId) : MetaM Nat := do
match (← getMCtx).findLevelDepth? mvarId with
| some depth => return depth
| _ => throwError "unknown universe metavariable '?{mvarId.name}'"
@[deprecated LMVarId.getLevel]
def getLevelMVarDepth (mvarId : LMVarId) : MetaM Nat :=
mvarId.getLevel
/--
Return true if the given universe metavariable is "read-only".
That is, its `depth` is different from the current metavariable context depth.
-/
def _root_.Lean.LMVarId.isReadOnly (mvarId : LMVarId) : MetaM Bool := do
if (← getConfig).ignoreLevelMVarDepth then
return false
else
return (← mvarId.getLevel) != (← getMCtx).depth
@[deprecated LMVarId.isReadOnly]
def isReadOnlyLevelMVar (mvarId : LMVarId) : MetaM Bool := do
mvarId.isReadOnly
/--
Set the user-facing name for the given metavariable.
-/
def _root_.Lean.MVarId.setUserName (mvarId : MVarId) (newUserName : Name) : MetaM Unit :=
modifyMCtx fun mctx => mctx.setMVarUserName mvarId newUserName
@[deprecated MVarId.setUserName]
def setMVarUserName (mvarId : MVarId) (userNameNew : Name) : MetaM Unit :=
mvarId.setUserName userNameNew
/--
Throw an exception saying `fvarId` is not declared in the current local context.
-/
def _root_.Lean.FVarId.throwUnknown (fvarId : FVarId) : CoreM α :=
throwError "unknown free variable '{mkFVar fvarId}'"
@[deprecated FVarId.throwUnknown]
def throwUnknownFVar (fvarId : FVarId) : MetaM α :=
fvarId.throwUnknown
/--
Return `some decl` if `fvarId` is declared in the current local context.
-/
def _root_.Lean.FVarId.findDecl? (fvarId : FVarId) : MetaM (Option LocalDecl) :=
return (← getLCtx).find? fvarId
@[deprecated FVarId.findDecl?]
def findLocalDecl? (fvarId : FVarId) : MetaM (Option LocalDecl) :=
fvarId.findDecl?
/--
Return the local declaration for the given free variable.
Throw an exception if local declaration is not in the current local context.
-/
def _root_.Lean.FVarId.getDecl (fvarId : FVarId) : MetaM LocalDecl := do
match (← getLCtx).find? fvarId with
| some d => return d
| none => fvarId.throwUnknown
@[deprecated FVarId.getDecl]
def getLocalDecl (fvarId : FVarId) : MetaM LocalDecl := do
fvarId.getDecl
/-- Return the type of the given free variable. -/
def _root_.Lean.FVarId.getType (fvarId : FVarId) : MetaM Expr :=
return (← fvarId.getDecl).type
/-- Return the binder information for the given free variable. -/
def _root_.Lean.FVarId.getBinderInfo (fvarId : FVarId) : MetaM BinderInfo :=
return (← fvarId.getDecl).binderInfo
/-- Return `some value` if the given free variable is a let-declaration, and `none` otherwise. -/
def _root_.Lean.FVarId.getValue? (fvarId : FVarId) : MetaM (Option Expr) :=
return (← fvarId.getDecl).value?
/-- Return the user-facing name for the given free variable. -/
def _root_.Lean.FVarId.getUserName (fvarId : FVarId) : MetaM Name :=
return (← fvarId.getDecl).userName
/-- Return `true` is the free variable is a let-variable. -/
def _root_.Lean.FVarId.isLetVar (fvarId : FVarId) : MetaM Bool :=
return (← fvarId.getDecl).isLet
/-- Get the local declaration associated to the given `Expr` in the current local
context. Fails if the given expression is not a fvar or if no such declaration exists. -/
def getFVarLocalDecl (fvar : Expr) : MetaM LocalDecl :=
fvar.fvarId!.getDecl
/--
Given a user-facing name for a free variable, return its declaration in the current local context.
Throw an exception if free variable is not declared.
-/
def getLocalDeclFromUserName (userName : Name) : MetaM LocalDecl := do
match (← getLCtx).findFromUserName? userName with
| some d => pure d
| none => throwError "unknown local declaration '{userName}'"
/--
Lift a `MkBindingM` monadic action `x` to `MetaM`.
-/
@[inline] def liftMkBindingM (x : MetavarContext.MkBindingM α) : MetaM α := do
match x { lctx := (← getLCtx), mainModule := (← getEnv).mainModule } { mctx := (← getMCtx), ngen := (← getNGen), nextMacroScope := (← getThe Core.State).nextMacroScope } with
| .ok e sNew => do
setMCtx sNew.mctx
modifyThe Core.State fun s => { s with ngen := sNew.ngen, nextMacroScope := sNew.nextMacroScope }
pure e
| .error (.revertFailure ..) sNew => do
setMCtx sNew.mctx
modifyThe Core.State fun s => { s with ngen := sNew.ngen, nextMacroScope := sNew.nextMacroScope }
throwError "failed to create binder due to failure when reverting variable dependencies"
/--
Similar to `abstracM` but consider only the first `min n xs.size` entries in `xs`
It is also similar to `Expr.abstractRange`, but handles metavariables correctly.
It uses `elimMVarDeps` to ensure `e` and the type of the free variables `xs` do not
contain a metavariable `?m` s.t. local context of `?m` contains a free variable in `xs`.
-/
def _root_.Lean.Expr.abstractRangeM (e : Expr) (n : Nat) (xs : Array Expr) : MetaM Expr :=
liftMkBindingM <| MetavarContext.abstractRange e n xs
@[deprecated Expr.abstractRangeM]
def abstractRange (e : Expr) (n : Nat) (xs : Array Expr) : MetaM Expr :=
e.abstractRangeM n xs
/--
Replace free (or meta) variables `xs` with loose bound variables.
Similar to `Expr.abstract`, but handles metavariables correctly.
-/
def _root_.Lean.Expr.abstractM (e : Expr) (xs : Array Expr) : MetaM Expr :=
e.abstractRangeM xs.size xs
@[deprecated Expr.abstractM]
def abstract (e : Expr) (xs : Array Expr) : MetaM Expr :=
e.abstractM xs
/--
Collect forward dependencies for the free variables in `toRevert`.
Recall that when reverting free variables `xs`, we must also revert their forward dependencies.
-/
def collectForwardDeps (toRevert : Array Expr) (preserveOrder : Bool) : MetaM (Array Expr) := do
liftMkBindingM <| MetavarContext.collectForwardDeps toRevert preserveOrder
/-- Takes an array `xs` of free variables or metavariables and a term `e` that may contain those variables, and abstracts and binds them as universal quantifiers.
- if `usedOnly = true` then only variables that the expression body depends on will appear.
- if `usedLetOnly = true` same as `usedOnly` except for let-bound variables. (That is, local constants which have been assigned a value.)
-/
def mkForallFVars (xs : Array Expr) (e : Expr) (usedOnly : Bool := false) (usedLetOnly : Bool := true) (binderInfoForMVars := BinderInfo.implicit) : MetaM Expr :=
if xs.isEmpty then return e else liftMkBindingM <| MetavarContext.mkForall xs e usedOnly usedLetOnly binderInfoForMVars
/-- Takes an array `xs` of free variables and metavariables and a
body term `e` and creates `fun ..xs => e`, suitably
abstracting `e` and the types in `xs`. -/
def mkLambdaFVars (xs : Array Expr) (e : Expr) (usedOnly : Bool := false) (usedLetOnly : Bool := true) (binderInfoForMVars := BinderInfo.implicit) : MetaM Expr :=
if xs.isEmpty then return e else liftMkBindingM <| MetavarContext.mkLambda xs e usedOnly usedLetOnly binderInfoForMVars
def mkLetFVars (xs : Array Expr) (e : Expr) (usedLetOnly := true) (binderInfoForMVars := BinderInfo.implicit) : MetaM Expr :=
mkLambdaFVars xs e (usedLetOnly := usedLetOnly) (binderInfoForMVars := binderInfoForMVars)
/-- `fun _ : Unit => a` -/
def mkFunUnit (a : Expr) : MetaM Expr :=
return Lean.mkLambda (← mkFreshUserName `x) BinderInfo.default (mkConst ``Unit) a
def elimMVarDeps (xs : Array Expr) (e : Expr) (preserveOrder : Bool := false) : MetaM Expr :=
if xs.isEmpty then pure e else liftMkBindingM <| MetavarContext.elimMVarDeps xs e preserveOrder
/-- `withConfig f x` executes `x` using the updated configuration object obtained by applying `f`. -/
@[inline] def withConfig (f : Config → Config) : n α → n α :=
mapMetaM <| withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with config := f ctx.config })
@[inline] def withTrackingZeta (x : n α) : n α :=
withConfig (fun cfg => { cfg with trackZeta := true }) x
@[inline] def withoutProofIrrelevance (x : n α) : n α :=
withConfig (fun cfg => { cfg with proofIrrelevance := false }) x
@[inline] def withTransparency (mode : TransparencyMode) : n α → n α :=
mapMetaM <| withConfig (fun config => { config with transparency := mode })
/-- `withDefault x` excutes `x` using the default transparency setting. -/
@[inline] def withDefault (x : n α) : n α :=
withTransparency TransparencyMode.default x
/-- `withReducible x` excutes `x` using the reducible transparency setting. In this setting only definitions tagged as `[reducible]` are unfolded. -/
@[inline] def withReducible (x : n α) : n α :=
withTransparency TransparencyMode.reducible x
/--
`withReducibleAndInstances x` excutes `x` using the `.instances` transparency setting. In this setting only definitions tagged as `[reducible]`
or type class instances are unfolded.
-/
@[inline] def withReducibleAndInstances (x : n α) : n α :=
withTransparency TransparencyMode.instances x
/--
Execute `x` ensuring the transparency setting is at least `mode`.
Recall that `.all > .default > .instances > .reducible`.
-/
@[inline] def withAtLeastTransparency (mode : TransparencyMode) (x : n α) : n α :=
withConfig
(fun config =>
let oldMode := config.transparency
let mode := if oldMode.lt mode then mode else oldMode
{ config with transparency := mode })
x
/-- Execute `x` allowing `isDefEq` to assign synthetic opaque metavariables. -/
@[inline] def withAssignableSyntheticOpaque (x : n α) : n α :=
withConfig (fun config => { config with assignSyntheticOpaque := true }) x
/-- Save cache, execute `x`, restore cache -/
@[inline] private def savingCacheImpl (x : MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
let savedCache := (← get).cache
try x finally modify fun s => { s with cache := savedCache }
@[inline] def savingCache : n α → n α :=
mapMetaM savingCacheImpl
def getTheoremInfo (info : ConstantInfo) : MetaM (Option ConstantInfo) := do
if (← shouldReduceAll) then
return some info
else
return none
private def getDefInfoTemp (info : ConstantInfo) : MetaM (Option ConstantInfo) := do
match (← getTransparency) with
| TransparencyMode.all => return some info
| TransparencyMode.default => return some info
| _ =>
if (← isReducible info.name) then
return some info
else
return none
/-- Remark: we later define `getConst?` at `GetConst.lean` after we define `Instances.lean`.
This method is only used to implement `isClassQuickConst?`.
It is very similar to `getConst?`, but it returns none when `TransparencyMode.instances` and
`constName` is an instance. This difference should be irrelevant for `isClassQuickConst?`. -/
private def getConstTemp? (constName : Name) : MetaM (Option ConstantInfo) := do
match (← getEnv).find? constName with
| some (info@(ConstantInfo.thmInfo _)) => getTheoremInfo info
| some (info@(ConstantInfo.defnInfo _)) => getDefInfoTemp info
| some info => pure (some info)
| none => throwUnknownConstant constName
private def isClassQuickConst? (constName : Name) : MetaM (LOption Name) := do
if isClass (← getEnv) constName then
return .some constName
else
match (← getConstTemp? constName) with
| some (.defnInfo ..) => return .undef -- We may be able to unfold the definition
| _ => return .none
private partial def isClassQuick? : Expr → MetaM (LOption Name)
| .bvar .. => return .none
| .lit .. => return .none
| .fvar .. => return .none
| .sort .. => return .none
| .lam .. => return .none
| .letE .. => return .undef
| .proj .. => return .undef
| .forallE _ _ b _ => isClassQuick? b
| .mdata _ e => isClassQuick? e
| .const n _ => isClassQuickConst? n
| .mvar mvarId => do
match (← getExprMVarAssignment? mvarId) with
| some val => isClassQuick? val
| none => return .none
| .app f _ =>
match f.getAppFn with
| .const n .. => isClassQuickConst? n
| .lam .. => return .undef
| _ => return .none
def saveAndResetSynthInstanceCache : MetaM SynthInstanceCache := do
let savedSythInstance := (← get).cache.synthInstance
modifyCache fun c => { c with synthInstance := {} }
return savedSythInstance
def restoreSynthInstanceCache (cache : SynthInstanceCache) : MetaM Unit :=
modifyCache fun c => { c with synthInstance := cache }
@[inline] private def resettingSynthInstanceCacheImpl (x : MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
let savedSythInstance ← saveAndResetSynthInstanceCache
try x finally restoreSynthInstanceCache savedSythInstance
/-- Reset `synthInstance` cache, execute `x`, and restore cache -/
@[inline] def resettingSynthInstanceCache : n α → n α :=
mapMetaM resettingSynthInstanceCacheImpl
@[inline] def resettingSynthInstanceCacheWhen (b : Bool) (x : n α) : n α :=
if b then resettingSynthInstanceCache x else x
private def withNewLocalInstanceImp (className : Name) (fvar : Expr) (k : MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
let localDecl ← getFVarLocalDecl fvar
/- Recall that we use `auxDecl` binderInfo when compiling recursive declarations. -/
match localDecl.binderInfo with
| .auxDecl => k
| _ =>
resettingSynthInstanceCache <|
withReader
(fun ctx => { ctx with localInstances := ctx.localInstances.push { className := className, fvar := fvar } })
k
/-- Add entry `{ className := className, fvar := fvar }` to localInstances,
and then execute continuation `k`.
It resets the type class cache using `resettingSynthInstanceCache`. -/
def withNewLocalInstance (className : Name) (fvar : Expr) : n α → n α :=
mapMetaM <| withNewLocalInstanceImp className fvar
private def fvarsSizeLtMaxFVars (fvars : Array Expr) (maxFVars? : Option Nat) : Bool :=
match maxFVars? with
| some maxFVars => fvars.size < maxFVars
| none => true
mutual
/--
`withNewLocalInstances isClassExpensive fvars j k` updates the vector or local instances
using free variables `fvars[j] ... fvars.back`, and execute `k`.
- `isClassExpensive` is defined later.
- The type class chache is reset whenever a new local instance is found.
- `isClassExpensive` uses `whnf` which depends (indirectly) on the set of local instances.
Thus, each new local instance requires a new `resettingSynthInstanceCache`. -/
private partial def withNewLocalInstancesImp
(fvars : Array Expr) (i : Nat) (k : MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
if h : i < fvars.size then
let fvar := fvars.get ⟨i, h⟩
let decl ← getFVarLocalDecl fvar
match (← isClassQuick? decl.type) with
| .none => withNewLocalInstancesImp fvars (i+1) k
| .undef =>
match (← isClassExpensive? decl.type) with
| none => withNewLocalInstancesImp fvars (i+1) k
| some c => withNewLocalInstance c fvar <| withNewLocalInstancesImp fvars (i+1) k
| .some c => withNewLocalInstance c fvar <| withNewLocalInstancesImp fvars (i+1) k
else
k
/--
`forallTelescopeAuxAux lctx fvars j type`
Remarks:
- `lctx` is the `MetaM` local context extended with declarations for `fvars`.
- `type` is the type we are computing the telescope for. It contains only
dangling bound variables in the range `[j, fvars.size)`
- if `reducing? == true` and `type` is not `forallE`, we use `whnf`.
- when `type` is not a `forallE` nor it can't be reduced to one, we
excute the continuation `k`.
Here is an example that demonstrates the `reducing?`.
Suppose we have
```
abbrev StateM s a := s -> Prod a s
```
Now, assume we are trying to build the telescope for
```
forall (x : Nat), StateM Int Bool
```
if `reducing == true`, the function executes `k #[(x : Nat) (s : Int)] Bool`.
if `reducing == false`, the function executes `k #[(x : Nat)] (StateM Int Bool)`
if `maxFVars?` is `some max`, then we interrupt the telescope construction
when `fvars.size == max`
-/
private partial def forallTelescopeReducingAuxAux
(reducing : Bool) (maxFVars? : Option Nat)
(type : Expr)
(k : Array Expr → Expr → MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
let rec process (lctx : LocalContext) (fvars : Array Expr) (j : Nat) (type : Expr) : MetaM α := do
match type with
| .forallE n d b bi =>
if fvarsSizeLtMaxFVars fvars maxFVars? then
let d := d.instantiateRevRange j fvars.size fvars
let fvarId ← mkFreshFVarId
let lctx := lctx.mkLocalDecl fvarId n d bi
let fvar := mkFVar fvarId
let fvars := fvars.push fvar
process lctx fvars j b
else
let type := type.instantiateRevRange j fvars.size fvars;
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with lctx := lctx }) do
withNewLocalInstancesImp fvars j do
k fvars type
| _ =>
let type := type.instantiateRevRange j fvars.size fvars;
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with lctx := lctx }) do
withNewLocalInstancesImp fvars j do
if reducing && fvarsSizeLtMaxFVars fvars maxFVars? then
let newType ← whnf type
if newType.isForall then
process lctx fvars fvars.size newType
else
k fvars type
else
k fvars type
process (← getLCtx) #[] 0 type
private partial def forallTelescopeReducingAux (type : Expr) (maxFVars? : Option Nat) (k : Array Expr → Expr → MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
match maxFVars? with
| some 0 => k #[] type
| _ => do
let newType ← whnf type
if newType.isForall then
forallTelescopeReducingAuxAux true maxFVars? newType k
else
k #[] type
private partial def isClassExpensive? (type : Expr) : MetaM (Option Name) :=
withReducible do -- when testing whether a type is a type class, we only unfold reducible constants.
forallTelescopeReducingAux type none fun _ type => do
let env ← getEnv
match type.getAppFn with
| .const c _ => do
if isClass env c then
return some c
else
-- make sure abbreviations are unfolded
match (← whnf type).getAppFn with
| .const c _ => return if isClass env c then some c else none
| _ => return none
| _ => return none
private partial def isClassImp? (type : Expr) : MetaM (Option Name) := do
match (← isClassQuick? type) with
| .none => return none
| .some c => return (some c)
| .undef => isClassExpensive? type
end
/--
`isClass? type` return `some ClsName` if `type` is an instance of the class `ClsName`.
Example:
```
#eval do
let x ← mkAppM ``Inhabited #[mkConst ``Nat]
IO.println (← isClass? x)
-- (some Inhabited)
```
-/
def isClass? (type : Expr) : MetaM (Option Name) :=
try isClassImp? type catch _ => return none
private def withNewLocalInstancesImpAux (fvars : Array Expr) (j : Nat) : n α → n α :=
mapMetaM <| withNewLocalInstancesImp fvars j
partial def withNewLocalInstances (fvars : Array Expr) (j : Nat) : n α → n α :=
mapMetaM <| withNewLocalInstancesImpAux fvars j
@[inline] private def forallTelescopeImp (type : Expr) (k : Array Expr → Expr → MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
forallTelescopeReducingAuxAux (reducing := false) (maxFVars? := none) type k
/--
Given `type` of the form `forall xs, A`, execute `k xs A`.
This combinator will declare local declarations, create free variables for them,
execute `k` with updated local context, and make sure the cache is restored after executing `k`. -/
def forallTelescope (type : Expr) (k : Array Expr → Expr → n α) : n α :=
map2MetaM (fun k => forallTelescopeImp type k) k
private def forallTelescopeReducingImp (type : Expr) (k : Array Expr → Expr → MetaM α) : MetaM α :=
forallTelescopeReducingAux type (maxFVars? := none) k
/--
Similar to `forallTelescope`, but given `type` of the form `forall xs, A`,
it reduces `A` and continues bulding the telescope if it is a `forall`. -/
def forallTelescopeReducing (type : Expr) (k : Array Expr → Expr → n α) : n α :=
map2MetaM (fun k => forallTelescopeReducingImp type k) k
private def forallBoundedTelescopeImp (type : Expr) (maxFVars? : Option Nat) (k : Array Expr → Expr → MetaM α) : MetaM α :=
forallTelescopeReducingAux type maxFVars? k
/--
Similar to `forallTelescopeReducing`, stops constructing the telescope when
it reaches size `maxFVars`. -/
def forallBoundedTelescope (type : Expr) (maxFVars? : Option Nat) (k : Array Expr → Expr → n α) : n α :=
map2MetaM (fun k => forallBoundedTelescopeImp type maxFVars? k) k
private partial def lambdaTelescopeImp (e : Expr) (consumeLet : Bool) (k : Array Expr → Expr → MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
process consumeLet (← getLCtx) #[] 0 e
where
process (consumeLet : Bool) (lctx : LocalContext) (fvars : Array Expr) (j : Nat) (e : Expr) : MetaM α := do
match consumeLet, e with
| _, .lam n d b bi =>
let d := d.instantiateRevRange j fvars.size fvars
let fvarId ← mkFreshFVarId
let lctx := lctx.mkLocalDecl fvarId n d bi
let fvar := mkFVar fvarId
process consumeLet lctx (fvars.push fvar) j b
| true, .letE n t v b _ => do
let t := t.instantiateRevRange j fvars.size fvars
let v := v.instantiateRevRange j fvars.size fvars
let fvarId ← mkFreshFVarId
let lctx := lctx.mkLetDecl fvarId n t v
let fvar := mkFVar fvarId
process true lctx (fvars.push fvar) j b
| _, e =>
let e := e.instantiateRevRange j fvars.size fvars
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with lctx := lctx }) do
withNewLocalInstancesImp fvars j do
k fvars e
/-- Similar to `lambdaTelescope` but for lambda and let expressions. -/
def lambdaLetTelescope (e : Expr) (k : Array Expr → Expr → n α) : n α :=
map2MetaM (fun k => lambdaTelescopeImp e true k) k
/--
Given `e` of the form `fun ..xs => A`, execute `k xs A`.
This combinator will declare local declarations, create free variables for them,
execute `k` with updated local context, and make sure the cache is restored after executing `k`. -/
def lambdaTelescope (e : Expr) (k : Array Expr → Expr → n α) : n α :=
map2MetaM (fun k => lambdaTelescopeImp e false k) k
/-- Return the parameter names for the given global declaration. -/
def getParamNames (declName : Name) : MetaM (Array Name) := do
forallTelescopeReducing (← getConstInfo declName).type fun xs _ => do
xs.mapM fun x => do
let localDecl ← x.fvarId!.getDecl
return localDecl.userName
-- `kind` specifies the metavariable kind for metavariables not corresponding to instance implicit `[ ... ]` arguments.
private partial def forallMetaTelescopeReducingAux
(e : Expr) (reducing : Bool) (maxMVars? : Option Nat) (kind : MetavarKind) : MetaM (Array Expr × Array BinderInfo × Expr) :=
process #[] #[] 0 e
where
process (mvars : Array Expr) (bis : Array BinderInfo) (j : Nat) (type : Expr) : MetaM (Array Expr × Array BinderInfo × Expr) := do
if maxMVars?.isEqSome mvars.size then
let type := type.instantiateRevRange j mvars.size mvars;
return (mvars, bis, type)
else
match type with
| .forallE n d b bi =>
let d := d.instantiateRevRange j mvars.size mvars
let k := if bi.isInstImplicit then MetavarKind.synthetic else kind
let mvar ← mkFreshExprMVar d k n
let mvars := mvars.push mvar
let bis := bis.push bi
process mvars bis j b
| _ =>
let type := type.instantiateRevRange j mvars.size mvars;
if reducing then do
let newType ← whnf type;
if newType.isForall then
process mvars bis mvars.size newType
else
return (mvars, bis, type)
else
return (mvars, bis, type)
/-- Given `e` of the form `forall ..xs, A`, this combinator will create a new
metavariable for each `x` in `xs` and instantiate `A` with these.
Returns a product containing
- the new metavariables
- the binder info for the `xs`
- the instantiated `A`
-/
def forallMetaTelescope (e : Expr) (kind := MetavarKind.natural) : MetaM (Array Expr × Array BinderInfo × Expr) :=
forallMetaTelescopeReducingAux e (reducing := false) (maxMVars? := none) kind
/-- Similar to `forallMetaTelescope`, but if `e = forall ..xs, A`
it will reduce `A` to construct further mvars. -/
def forallMetaTelescopeReducing (e : Expr) (maxMVars? : Option Nat := none) (kind := MetavarKind.natural) : MetaM (Array Expr × Array BinderInfo × Expr) :=
forallMetaTelescopeReducingAux e (reducing := true) maxMVars? kind
/-- Similar to `forallMetaTelescopeReducing`, stops
constructing the telescope when it reaches size `maxMVars`. -/
def forallMetaBoundedTelescope (e : Expr) (maxMVars : Nat) (kind : MetavarKind := MetavarKind.natural) : MetaM (Array Expr × Array BinderInfo × Expr) :=
forallMetaTelescopeReducingAux e (reducing := true) (maxMVars? := some maxMVars) (kind := kind)
/-- Similar to `forallMetaTelescopeReducingAux` but for lambda expressions. -/
partial def lambdaMetaTelescope (e : Expr) (maxMVars? : Option Nat := none) : MetaM (Array Expr × Array BinderInfo × Expr) :=
process #[] #[] 0 e
where
process (mvars : Array Expr) (bis : Array BinderInfo) (j : Nat) (type : Expr) : MetaM (Array Expr × Array BinderInfo × Expr) := do
let finalize : Unit → MetaM (Array Expr × Array BinderInfo × Expr) := fun _ => do
let type := type.instantiateRevRange j mvars.size mvars
return (mvars, bis, type)
if maxMVars?.isEqSome mvars.size then
finalize ()
else
match type with
| .lam _ d b bi =>
let d := d.instantiateRevRange j mvars.size mvars
let mvar ← mkFreshExprMVar d
let mvars := mvars.push mvar
let bis := bis.push bi
process mvars bis j b
| _ => finalize ()
private def withNewFVar (fvar fvarType : Expr) (k : Expr → MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
match (← isClass? fvarType) with
| none => k fvar
| some c => withNewLocalInstance c fvar <| k fvar
private def withLocalDeclImp (n : Name) (bi : BinderInfo) (type : Expr) (k : Expr → MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
let fvarId ← mkFreshFVarId
let ctx ← read
let lctx := ctx.lctx.mkLocalDecl fvarId n type bi
let fvar := mkFVar fvarId
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with lctx := lctx }) do
withNewFVar fvar type k
/-- Create a free variable `x` with name, binderInfo and type, add it to the context and run in `k`.
Then revert the context. -/
def withLocalDecl (name : Name) (bi : BinderInfo) (type : Expr) (k : Expr → n α) : n α :=
map1MetaM (fun k => withLocalDeclImp name bi type k) k
def withLocalDeclD (name : Name) (type : Expr) (k : Expr → n α) : n α :=
withLocalDecl name BinderInfo.default type k
/-- Append an array of free variables `xs` to the local context and execute `k xs`.
declInfos takes the form of an array consisting of:
- the name of the variable
- the binder info of the variable
- a type constructor for the variable, where the array consists of all of the free variables
defined prior to this one. This is needed because the type of the variable may depend on prior variables.
-/
partial def withLocalDecls
[Inhabited α]
(declInfos : Array (Name × BinderInfo × (Array Expr → n Expr)))
(k : (xs : Array Expr) → n α)
: n α :=
loop #[]
where
loop [Inhabited α] (acc : Array Expr) : n α := do
if acc.size < declInfos.size then
let (name, bi, typeCtor) := declInfos[acc.size]!
withLocalDecl name bi (←typeCtor acc) fun x => loop (acc.push x)
else
k acc
def withLocalDeclsD [Inhabited α] (declInfos : Array (Name × (Array Expr → n Expr))) (k : (xs : Array Expr) → n α) : n α :=
withLocalDecls
(declInfos.map (fun (name, typeCtor) => (name, BinderInfo.default, typeCtor))) k
private def withNewBinderInfosImp (bs : Array (FVarId × BinderInfo)) (k : MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
let lctx := bs.foldl (init := (← getLCtx)) fun lctx (fvarId, bi) =>
lctx.setBinderInfo fvarId bi
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with lctx := lctx }) k
def withNewBinderInfos (bs : Array (FVarId × BinderInfo)) (k : n α) : n α :=
mapMetaM (fun k => withNewBinderInfosImp bs k) k
/--
Execute `k` using a local context where any `x` in `xs` that is tagged as
instance implicit is treated as a regular implicit. -/
def withInstImplicitAsImplict (xs : Array Expr) (k : MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
let newBinderInfos ← xs.filterMapM fun x => do
let bi ← x.fvarId!.getBinderInfo
if bi == .instImplicit then
return some (x.fvarId!, .implicit)
else
return none
withNewBinderInfos newBinderInfos k
private def withLetDeclImp (n : Name) (type : Expr) (val : Expr) (k : Expr → MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
let fvarId ← mkFreshFVarId
let ctx ← read
let lctx := ctx.lctx.mkLetDecl fvarId n type val
let fvar := mkFVar fvarId
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with lctx := lctx }) do
withNewFVar fvar type k
/--
Add the local declaration `<name> : <type> := <val>` to the local context and execute `k x`, where `x` is a new
free variable corresponding to the `let`-declaration. After executing `k x`, the local context is restored.
-/
def withLetDecl (name : Name) (type : Expr) (val : Expr) (k : Expr → n α) : n α :=
map1MetaM (fun k => withLetDeclImp name type val k) k
def withLocalInstancesImp (decls : List LocalDecl) (k : MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
let localInsts := (← read).localInstances
let size := localInsts.size
let localInstsNew ← decls.foldlM (init := localInsts) fun localInstsNew decl => do
match (← isClass? decl.type) with
| none => return localInstsNew
| some className => return localInstsNew.push { className, fvar := decl.toExpr }
if localInstsNew.size == size then
k
else
resettingSynthInstanceCache <| withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with localInstances := localInstsNew }) k
/-- Register any local instance in `decls` -/
def withLocalInstances (decls : List LocalDecl) : n α → n α :=
mapMetaM <| withLocalInstancesImp decls
private def withExistingLocalDeclsImp (decls : List LocalDecl) (k : MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
let ctx ← read
let lctx := decls.foldl (fun (lctx : LocalContext) decl => lctx.addDecl decl) ctx.lctx
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with lctx := lctx }) do
withLocalInstancesImp decls k
/--
`withExistingLocalDecls decls k`, adds the given local declarations to the local context,
and then executes `k`. This method assumes declarations in `decls` have valid `FVarId`s.
After executing `k`, the local context is restored.
Remark: this method is used, for example, to implement the `match`-compiler.
Each `match`-alternative commes with a local declarations (corresponding to pattern variables),
and we use `withExistingLocalDecls` to add them to the local context before we process
them.
-/
def withExistingLocalDecls (decls : List LocalDecl) : n α → n α :=
mapMetaM <| withExistingLocalDeclsImp decls
private def withNewMCtxDepthImp (x : MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
let saved ← get
modify fun s => { s with mctx := s.mctx.incDepth, postponed := {} }
try
x
finally
modify fun s => { s with mctx := saved.mctx, postponed := saved.postponed }
/--
Save cache and `MetavarContext`, bump the `MetavarContext` depth, execute `x`,
and restore saved data.
Metavariable context depths are used to control which metavariables may be assigned in `isDefEq`.
See the docstring of `isDefEq` for more information.
-/
def withNewMCtxDepth : n α → n α :=
mapMetaM withNewMCtxDepthImp
private def withLocalContextImp (lctx : LocalContext) (localInsts : LocalInstances) (x : MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
let localInstsCurr ← getLocalInstances
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with lctx := lctx, localInstances := localInsts }) do
if localInsts == localInstsCurr then
x
else
resettingSynthInstanceCache x
/--
`withLCtx lctx localInsts k` replaces the local context and local instances, and then executes `k`.
The local context and instances are restored after executing `k`.
This method assumes that the local instances in `localInsts` are in the local context `lctx`.
-/
def withLCtx (lctx : LocalContext) (localInsts : LocalInstances) : n α → n α :=
mapMetaM <| withLocalContextImp lctx localInsts
private def withMVarContextImp (mvarId : MVarId) (x : MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
let mvarDecl ← mvarId.getDecl
withLocalContextImp mvarDecl.lctx mvarDecl.localInstances x
/--
Execute `x` using the given metavariable `LocalContext` and `LocalInstances`.
The type class resolution cache is flushed when executing `x` if its `LocalInstances` are
different from the current ones. -/
def _root_.Lean.MVarId.withContext (mvarId : MVarId) : n α → n α :=
mapMetaM <| withMVarContextImp mvarId
@[deprecated MVarId.withContext]
def withMVarContext (mvarId : MVarId) : n α → n α :=
mvarId.withContext
private def withMCtxImp (mctx : MetavarContext) (x : MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
let mctx' ← getMCtx
setMCtx mctx
try x finally setMCtx mctx'
/--
`withMCtx mctx k` replaces the metavariable context and then executes `k`.
The metavariable context is restored after executing `k`.
This method is used to implement the type class resolution procedure. -/
def withMCtx (mctx : MetavarContext) : n α → n α :=
mapMetaM <| withMCtxImp mctx
@[inline] private def approxDefEqImp (x : MetaM α) : MetaM α :=
withConfig (fun config => { config with foApprox := true, ctxApprox := true, quasiPatternApprox := true}) x
/-- Execute `x` using approximate unification: `foApprox`, `ctxApprox` and `quasiPatternApprox`. -/
@[inline] def approxDefEq : n α → n α :=
mapMetaM approxDefEqImp
@[inline] private def fullApproxDefEqImp (x : MetaM α) : MetaM α :=
withConfig (fun config => { config with foApprox := true, ctxApprox := true, quasiPatternApprox := true, constApprox := true }) x
/--
Similar to `approxDefEq`, but uses all available approximations.
We don't use `constApprox` by default at `approxDefEq` because it often produces undesirable solution for monadic code.
For example, suppose we have `pure (x > 0)` which has type `?m Prop`. We also have the goal `[Pure ?m]`.
Now, assume the expected type is `IO Bool`. Then, the unification constraint `?m Prop =?= IO Bool` could be solved
as `?m := fun _ => IO Bool` using `constApprox`, but this spurious solution would generate a failure when we try to
solve `[Pure (fun _ => IO Bool)]` -/
@[inline] def fullApproxDefEq : n α → n α :=
mapMetaM fullApproxDefEqImp
/-- Instantiate assigned universe metavariables in `u`, and then normalize it. -/
def normalizeLevel (u : Level) : MetaM Level := do
let u ← instantiateLevelMVars u
pure u.normalize
/-- `whnf` with reducible transparency.-/
def whnfR (e : Expr) : MetaM Expr :=
withTransparency TransparencyMode.reducible <| whnf e
/-- `whnf` with default transparency.-/
def whnfD (e : Expr) : MetaM Expr :=
withTransparency TransparencyMode.default <| whnf e
/-- `whnf` with instances transparency.-/
def whnfI (e : Expr) : MetaM Expr :=
withTransparency TransparencyMode.instances <| whnf e
/--
Mark declaration `declName` with the attribute `[inline]`.
This method does not check whether the given declaration is a definition.
Recall that this attribute can only be set in the same module where `declName` has been declared.
-/
def setInlineAttribute (declName : Name) (kind := Compiler.InlineAttributeKind.inline): MetaM Unit := do
let env ← getEnv
match Compiler.setInlineAttribute env declName kind with
| .ok env => setEnv env
| .error msg => throwError msg
private partial def instantiateForallAux (ps : Array Expr) (i : Nat) (e : Expr) : MetaM Expr := do
if h : i < ps.size then
let p := ps.get ⟨i, h⟩
match (← whnf e) with
| .forallE _ _ b _ => instantiateForallAux ps (i+1) (b.instantiate1 p)
| _ => throwError "invalid instantiateForall, too many parameters"
else
return e
/-- Given `e` of the form `forall (a_1 : A_1) ... (a_n : A_n), B[a_1, ..., a_n]` and `p_1 : A_1, ... p_n : A_n`, return `B[p_1, ..., p_n]`. -/
def instantiateForall (e : Expr) (ps : Array Expr) : MetaM Expr :=
instantiateForallAux ps 0 e
private partial def instantiateLambdaAux (ps : Array Expr) (i : Nat) (e : Expr) : MetaM Expr := do
if h : i < ps.size then
let p := ps.get ⟨i, h⟩
match (← whnf e) with
| .lam _ _ b _ => instantiateLambdaAux ps (i+1) (b.instantiate1 p)
| _ => throwError "invalid instantiateLambda, too many parameters"
else
return e
/-- Given `e` of the form `fun (a_1 : A_1) ... (a_n : A_n) => t[a_1, ..., a_n]` and `p_1 : A_1, ... p_n : A_n`, return `t[p_1, ..., p_n]`.
It uses `whnf` to reduce `e` if it is not a lambda -/
def instantiateLambda (e : Expr) (ps : Array Expr) : MetaM Expr :=
instantiateLambdaAux ps 0 e
/-- Pretty-print the given expression. -/
def ppExpr (e : Expr) : MetaM Format := do
let ctxCore ← readThe Core.Context
Lean.ppExpr { env := (← getEnv), mctx := (← getMCtx), lctx := (← getLCtx), opts := (← getOptions), currNamespace := ctxCore.currNamespace, openDecls := ctxCore.openDecls } e
@[inline] protected def orElse (x : MetaM α) (y : Unit → MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
let s ← saveState
try x catch _ => s.restore; y ()
instance : OrElse (MetaM α) := ⟨Meta.orElse⟩
instance : Alternative MetaM where
failure := fun {_} => throwError "failed"
orElse := Meta.orElse
@[inline] private def orelseMergeErrorsImp (x y : MetaM α)
(mergeRef : Syntax → Syntax → Syntax := fun r₁ _ => r₁)
(mergeMsg : MessageData → MessageData → MessageData := fun m₁ m₂ => m₁ ++ Format.line ++ m₂) : MetaM α := do
let env ← getEnv
let mctx ← getMCtx
try
x
catch ex =>
setEnv env
setMCtx mctx
match ex with
| Exception.error ref₁ m₁ =>
try
y
catch
| Exception.error ref₂ m₂ => throw <| Exception.error (mergeRef ref₁ ref₂) (mergeMsg m₁ m₂)
| ex => throw ex
| ex => throw ex
/--
Similar to `orelse`, but merge errors. Note that internal errors are not caught.
The default `mergeRef` uses the `ref` (position information) for the first message.
The default `mergeMsg` combines error messages using `Format.line ++ Format.line` as a separator. -/
@[inline] def orelseMergeErrors [MonadControlT MetaM m] [Monad m] (x y : m α)
(mergeRef : Syntax → Syntax → Syntax := fun r₁ _ => r₁)
(mergeMsg : MessageData → MessageData → MessageData := fun m₁ m₂ => m₁ ++ Format.line ++ Format.line ++ m₂) : m α := do
controlAt MetaM fun runInBase => orelseMergeErrorsImp (runInBase x) (runInBase y) mergeRef mergeMsg
/-- Execute `x`, and apply `f` to the produced error message -/
def mapErrorImp (x : MetaM α) (f : MessageData → MessageData) : MetaM α := do
try
x
catch
| Exception.error ref msg => throw <| Exception.error ref <| f msg
| ex => throw ex
@[inline] def mapError [MonadControlT MetaM m] [Monad m] (x : m α) (f : MessageData → MessageData) : m α :=
controlAt MetaM fun runInBase => mapErrorImp (runInBase x) f
/--
Sort free variables using an order `x < y` iff `x` was defined before `y`.
If a free variable is not in the local context, we use their id. -/
def sortFVarIds (fvarIds : Array FVarId) : MetaM (Array FVarId) := do
let lctx ← getLCtx
return fvarIds.qsort fun fvarId₁ fvarId₂ =>
match lctx.find? fvarId₁, lctx.find? fvarId₂ with
| some d₁, some d₂ => d₁.index < d₂.index
| some _, none => false
| none, some _ => true
| none, none => Name.quickLt fvarId₁.name fvarId₂.name
end Methods
/-- Return `true` if `declName` is an inductive predicate. That is, `inductive` type in `Prop`. -/
def isInductivePredicate (declName : Name) : MetaM Bool := do
match (← getEnv).find? declName with
| some (.inductInfo { type := type, ..}) =>
forallTelescopeReducing type fun _ type => do
match (← whnfD type) with
| .sort u .. => return u == levelZero
| _ => return false
| _ => return false
def isListLevelDefEqAux : List Level → List Level → MetaM Bool
| [], [] => return true
| u::us, v::vs => isLevelDefEqAux u v <&&> isListLevelDefEqAux us vs
| _, _ => return false
def getNumPostponed : MetaM Nat := do
return (← getPostponed).size
def getResetPostponed : MetaM (PersistentArray PostponedEntry) := do
let ps ← getPostponed
setPostponed {}
return ps
/-- Annotate any constant and sort in `e` that satisfies `p` with `pp.universes true` -/
private def exposeRelevantUniverses (e : Expr) (p : Level → Bool) : Expr :=
e.replace fun
| .const _ us => if us.any p then some (e.setPPUniverses true) else none
| .sort u => if p u then some (e.setPPUniverses true) else none
| _ => none
private def mkLeveErrorMessageCore (header : String) (entry : PostponedEntry) : MetaM MessageData := do
match entry.ctx? with
| none =>
return m!"{header}{indentD m!"{entry.lhs} =?= {entry.rhs}"}"
| some ctx =>
withLCtx ctx.lctx ctx.localInstances do
let s := entry.lhs.collectMVars entry.rhs.collectMVars
/- `p u` is true if it contains a universe metavariable in `s` -/
let p (u : Level) := u.any fun | .mvar m => s.contains m | _ => false
let lhs := exposeRelevantUniverses (← instantiateMVars ctx.lhs) p
let rhs := exposeRelevantUniverses (← instantiateMVars ctx.rhs) p
try
addMessageContext m!"{header}{indentD m!"{entry.lhs} =?= {entry.rhs}"}\nwhile trying to unify{indentD m!"{lhs} : {← inferType lhs}"}\nwith{indentD m!"{rhs} : {← inferType rhs}"}"
catch _ =>
addMessageContext m!"{header}{indentD m!"{entry.lhs} =?= {entry.rhs}"}\nwhile trying to unify{indentD lhs}\nwith{indentD rhs}"
def mkLevelStuckErrorMessage (entry : PostponedEntry) : MetaM MessageData := do
mkLeveErrorMessageCore "stuck at solving universe constraint" entry
def mkLevelErrorMessage (entry : PostponedEntry) : MetaM MessageData := do
mkLeveErrorMessageCore "failed to solve universe constraint" entry
private def processPostponedStep (exceptionOnFailure : Bool) : MetaM Bool := do
let ps ← getResetPostponed
for p in ps do
unless (← withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with defEqCtx? := p.ctx? }) <| isLevelDefEqAux p.lhs p.rhs) do
if exceptionOnFailure then
withRef p.ref do
throwError (← mkLevelErrorMessage p)
else
return false
return true
partial def processPostponed (mayPostpone : Bool := true) (exceptionOnFailure := false) : MetaM Bool := do
if (← getNumPostponed) == 0 then
return true
else
let numPostponedBegin ← getNumPostponed
withTraceNode `Meta.isLevelDefEq.postponed
(fun _ => return m!"processing #{numPostponedBegin} postponed is-def-eq level constraints") do
let rec loop : MetaM Bool := do
let numPostponed ← getNumPostponed
if numPostponed == 0 then
return true
else
if !(← processPostponedStep exceptionOnFailure) then
return false
else
let numPostponed' ← getNumPostponed
if numPostponed' == 0 then
return true
else if numPostponed' < numPostponed then
loop
else
trace[Meta.isLevelDefEq.postponed] "no progress solving pending is-def-eq level constraints"
return mayPostpone
loop
/--
`checkpointDefEq x` executes `x` and process all postponed universe level constraints produced by `x`.
We keep the modifications only if `processPostponed` return true and `x` returned `true`.
If `mayPostpone == false`, all new postponed universe level constraints must be solved before returning.
We currently try to postpone universe constraints as much as possible, even when by postponing them we
are not sure whether `x` really succeeded or not.
-/
@[specialize] def checkpointDefEq (x : MetaM Bool) (mayPostpone : Bool := true) : MetaM Bool := do
let s ← saveState
/-
It is not safe to use the `isDefEq` cache between different `isDefEq` calls.
Reason: different configuration settings, and result depends on the state of the `MetavarContext`
We have tried in the past to track when the result was independent of the `MetavarContext` state
but it was not effective. It is more important to cache aggressively inside of a single `isDefEq`
call because some of the heuristics create many similar subproblems.
See issue #1102 for an example that triggers an exponential blowup if we don't use this more
aggresive form of caching.
-/
modifyDefEqCache fun _ => {}
let postponed ← getResetPostponed
try
if (← x) then
if (← processPostponed mayPostpone) then
let newPostponed ← getPostponed
setPostponed (postponed ++ newPostponed)
return true
else
s.restore
return false
else
s.restore
return false
catch ex =>
s.restore
throw ex
/--
Determines whether two universe level expressions are definitionally equal to each other.
-/
def isLevelDefEq (u v : Level) : MetaM Bool :=
checkpointDefEq (mayPostpone := true) <| Meta.isLevelDefEqAux u v
/-- See `isDefEq`. -/
def isExprDefEq (t s : Expr) : MetaM Bool :=
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with defEqCtx? := some { lhs := t, rhs := s, lctx := ctx.lctx, localInstances := ctx.localInstances } }) do
checkpointDefEq (mayPostpone := true) <| Meta.isExprDefEqAux t s
/--
Determines whether two expressions are definitionally equal to each other.
To control how metavariables are assigned and unified, metavariables and their context have a "depth".
Given a metavariable `?m` and a `MetavarContext` `mctx`, `?m` is not assigned if `?m.depth != mctx.depth`.
The combinator `withNewMCtxDepth x` will bump the depth while executing `x`.
So, `withNewMCtxDepth (isDefEq a b)` is `isDefEq` without any mvar assignment happening
whereas `isDefEq a b` will assign any metavariables of the current depth in `a` and `b` to unify them.
For matching (where only mvars in `b` should be assigned), we create the term inside the `withNewMCtxDepth`.
For an example, see [Lean.Meta.Simp.tryTheoremWithExtraArgs?](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/blob/master/src/Lean/Meta/Tactic/Simp/Rewrite.lean#L100-L106)
-/
abbrev isDefEq (t s : Expr) : MetaM Bool :=
isExprDefEq t s
def isExprDefEqGuarded (a b : Expr) : MetaM Bool := do
try isExprDefEq a b catch _ => return false
/-- Similar to `isDefEq`, but returns `false` if an exception has been thrown. -/
abbrev isDefEqGuarded (t s : Expr) : MetaM Bool :=
isExprDefEqGuarded t s
def isDefEqNoConstantApprox (t s : Expr) : MetaM Bool :=
approxDefEq <| isDefEq t s
/--
Eta expand the given expression.
Example:
```
etaExpand (mkConst ``Nat.add)
```
produces `fun x y => Nat.add x y`
-/
def etaExpand (e : Expr) : MetaM Expr :=
withDefault do forallTelescopeReducing (← inferType e) fun xs _ => mkLambdaFVars xs (mkAppN e xs)
end Meta
builtin_initialize
registerTraceClass `Meta.isLevelDefEq.postponed
export Meta (MetaM)
end Lean
|
2658a3f4495f5b3c9473ec428bb265ffd190e1da | e0f9ba56b7fedc16ef8697f6caeef5898b435143 | /src/data/list/basic.lean | c1f1c5adea7c13a55291696b3f6727d596b321ac | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | anrddh/mathlib | 6a374da53c7e3a35cb0298b0cd67824efef362b4 | a4266a01d2dcb10de19369307c986d038c7bb6a6 | refs/heads/master | 1,656,710,827,909 | 1,589,560,456,000 | 1,589,560,456,000 | 264,271,800 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,589,568,062,000 | 1,589,568,061,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 154,184 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import algebra.group
import data.nat.basic
/-!
# Basic properties of lists
-/
open function nat
namespace list
universes u v w x
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type x}
attribute [inline] list.head
instance : is_left_id (list α) has_append.append [] :=
⟨ nil_append ⟩
instance : is_right_id (list α) has_append.append [] :=
⟨ append_nil ⟩
instance : is_associative (list α) has_append.append :=
⟨ append_assoc ⟩
theorem cons_ne_nil (a : α) (l : list α) : a::l ≠ [].
theorem head_eq_of_cons_eq {h₁ h₂ : α} {t₁ t₂ : list α} :
(h₁::t₁) = (h₂::t₂) → h₁ = h₂ :=
assume Peq, list.no_confusion Peq (assume Pheq Pteq, Pheq)
theorem tail_eq_of_cons_eq {h₁ h₂ : α} {t₁ t₂ : list α} :
(h₁::t₁) = (h₂::t₂) → t₁ = t₂ :=
assume Peq, list.no_confusion Peq (assume Pheq Pteq, Pteq)
theorem cons_inj {a : α} : injective (cons a) :=
assume l₁ l₂, assume Pe, tail_eq_of_cons_eq Pe
theorem cons_inj' (a : α) {l l' : list α} : a::l = a::l' ↔ l = l' :=
⟨λ e, cons_inj e, congr_arg _⟩
/-! ### mem -/
theorem mem_singleton_self (a : α) : a ∈ [a] := mem_cons_self _ _
theorem eq_of_mem_singleton {a b : α} : a ∈ [b] → a = b :=
assume : a ∈ [b], or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
(assume : a = b, this)
(assume : a ∈ [], absurd this (not_mem_nil a))
@[simp] theorem mem_singleton {a b : α} : a ∈ [b] ↔ a = b :=
⟨eq_of_mem_singleton, or.inl⟩
theorem mem_of_mem_cons_of_mem {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ b::l → b ∈ l → a ∈ l :=
assume ainbl binl, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons ainbl)
(assume : a = b, begin subst a, exact binl end)
(assume : a ∈ l, this)
theorem eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem {a b : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ b :: l) : a = b ∨ (a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l) :=
classical.by_cases or.inl $ assume : a ≠ b, h.elim or.inl $ assume h, or.inr ⟨this, h⟩
theorem not_mem_append {a : α} {s t : list α} (h₁ : a ∉ s) (h₂ : a ∉ t) : a ∉ s ++ t :=
mt mem_append.1 $ not_or_distrib.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
theorem ne_nil_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : l ≠ [] :=
by intro e; rw e at h; cases h
theorem mem_split {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : ∃ s t : list α, l = s ++ a :: t :=
begin
induction l with b l ih, {cases h}, rcases h with rfl | h,
{ exact ⟨[], l, rfl⟩ },
{ rcases ih h with ⟨s, t, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨b::s, t, rfl⟩ }
end
theorem mem_of_ne_of_mem {a y : α} {l : list α} (h₁ : a ≠ y) (h₂ : a ∈ y :: l) : a ∈ l :=
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h₂) (λe, absurd e h₁) (λr, r)
theorem ne_of_not_mem_cons {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∉ b::l → a ≠ b :=
assume nin aeqb, absurd (or.inl aeqb) nin
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_cons {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∉ b::l → a ∉ l :=
assume nin nainl, absurd (or.inr nainl) nin
theorem not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem {a y : α} {l : list α} : a ≠ y → a ∉ l → a ∉ y::l :=
assume p1 p2, not.intro (assume Pain, absurd (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons Pain) (not_or p1 p2))
theorem ne_and_not_mem_of_not_mem_cons {a y : α} {l : list α} : a ∉ y::l → a ≠ y ∧ a ∉ l :=
assume p, and.intro (ne_of_not_mem_cons p) (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons p)
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : α → β) {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : f a ∈ map f l :=
begin
induction l with b l' ih,
{cases h},
{rcases h with rfl | h,
{exact or.inl rfl},
{exact or.inr (ih h)}}
end
theorem exists_of_mem_map {f : α → β} {b : β} {l : list α} (h : b ∈ map f l) : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ f a = b :=
begin
induction l with c l' ih,
{cases h},
{cases (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h) with h h,
{exact ⟨c, mem_cons_self _ _, h.symm⟩},
{rcases ih h with ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩,
exact ⟨a, mem_cons_of_mem _ ha₁, ha₂⟩ }}
end
@[simp] theorem mem_map {f : α → β} {b : β} {l : list α} : b ∈ map f l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ f a = b :=
⟨exists_of_mem_map, λ ⟨a, la, h⟩, by rw [← h]; exact mem_map_of_mem f la⟩
theorem mem_map_of_inj {f : α → β} (H : injective f) {a : α} {l : list α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨λ m, let ⟨a', m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m in H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem _⟩
lemma forall_mem_map_iff {f : α → β} {l : list α} {P : β → Prop} :
(∀ i ∈ l.map f, P i) ↔ ∀ j ∈ l, P (f j) :=
begin
split,
{ assume H j hj,
exact H (f j) (mem_map_of_mem f hj) },
{ assume H i hi,
rcases mem_map.1 hi with ⟨j, hj, ji⟩,
rw ← ji,
exact H j hj }
end
@[simp] lemma map_eq_nil {f : α → β} {l : list α} : list.map f l = [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨by cases l; simp only [forall_prop_of_true, map, forall_prop_of_false, not_false_iff],
λ h, h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_join {a : α} : ∀ {L : list (list α)}, a ∈ join L ↔ ∃ l, l ∈ L ∧ a ∈ l
| [] := ⟨false.elim, λ⟨_, h, _⟩, false.elim h⟩
| (c :: L) := by simp only [join, mem_append, @mem_join L, mem_cons_iff, or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib, exists_eq_left]
theorem exists_of_mem_join {a : α} {L : list (list α)} : a ∈ join L → ∃ l, l ∈ L ∧ a ∈ l :=
mem_join.1
theorem mem_join_of_mem {a : α} {L : list (list α)} {l} (lL : l ∈ L) (al : a ∈ l) : a ∈ join L :=
mem_join.2 ⟨l, lL, al⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_bind {b : β} {l : list α} {f : α → list β} : b ∈ list.bind l f ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, b ∈ f a :=
iff.trans mem_join
⟨λ ⟨l', h1, h2⟩, let ⟨a, al, fa⟩ := exists_of_mem_map h1 in ⟨a, al, fa.symm ▸ h2⟩,
λ ⟨a, al, bfa⟩, ⟨f a, mem_map_of_mem _ al, bfa⟩⟩
theorem exists_of_mem_bind {b : β} {l : list α} {f : α → list β} : b ∈ list.bind l f → ∃ a ∈ l, b ∈ f a :=
mem_bind.1
theorem mem_bind_of_mem {b : β} {l : list α} {f : α → list β} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (h : b ∈ f a) : b ∈ list.bind l f :=
mem_bind.2 ⟨a, al, h⟩
lemma bind_map {g : α → list β} {f : β → γ} :
∀(l : list α), list.map f (l.bind g) = l.bind (λa, (g a).map f)
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by simp only [cons_bind, map_append, bind_map l]
/-! ### length -/
theorem length_eq_zero {l : list α} : length l = 0 ↔ l = [] :=
⟨eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero, λ h, h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
theorem length_pos_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l : list α}, a ∈ l → 0 < length l
| (b::l) _ := zero_lt_succ _
theorem exists_mem_of_length_pos : ∀ {l : list α}, 0 < length l → ∃ a, a ∈ l
| (b::l) _ := ⟨b, mem_cons_self _ _⟩
theorem length_pos_iff_exists_mem {l : list α} : 0 < length l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ l :=
⟨exists_mem_of_length_pos, λ ⟨a, h⟩, length_pos_of_mem h⟩
theorem ne_nil_of_length_pos {l : list α} : 0 < length l → l ≠ [] :=
λ h1 h2, lt_irrefl 0 ((length_eq_zero.2 h2).subst h1)
theorem length_pos_of_ne_nil {l : list α} : l ≠ [] → 0 < length l :=
λ h, pos_iff_ne_zero.2 $ λ h0, h $ length_eq_zero.1 h0
theorem length_pos_iff_ne_nil {l : list α} : 0 < length l ↔ l ≠ [] :=
⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩
theorem length_eq_one {l : list α} : length l = 1 ↔ ∃ a, l = [a] :=
⟨match l with [a], _ := ⟨a, rfl⟩ end, λ ⟨a, e⟩, e.symm ▸ rfl⟩
lemma exists_of_length_succ {n} :
∀ l : list α, l.length = n + 1 → ∃ h t, l = h :: t
| [] H := absurd H.symm $ succ_ne_zero n
| (h :: t) H := ⟨h, t, rfl⟩
lemma injective_length_iff : injective (list.length : list α → ℕ) ↔ subsingleton α :=
begin
split,
{ intro h, refine ⟨λ x y, _⟩, suffices : [x] = [y], { simpa using this }, apply h, refl },
{ intros hα l1 l2 hl, induction l1 generalizing l2; cases l2,
{ refl }, { cases hl }, { cases hl },
congr, exactI subsingleton.elim _ _, apply l1_ih, simpa using hl }
end
lemma injective_length [subsingleton α] : injective (length : list α → ℕ) :=
injective_length_iff.mpr $ by apply_instance
/-! ### set-theoretic notation of lists -/
lemma empty_eq : (∅ : list α) = [] := by refl
lemma singleton_eq [decidable_eq α] (x : α) : ({x} : list α) = [x] := by refl
lemma insert_neg [decidable_eq α] {x : α} {l : list α} (h : x ∉ l) :
has_insert.insert x l = x :: l :=
if_neg h
lemma insert_pos [decidable_eq α] {x : α} {l : list α} (h : x ∈ l) :
has_insert.insert x l = l :=
if_pos h
lemma doubleton_eq [decidable_eq α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : list α) = [y, x] :=
by { rw [insert_neg, singleton_eq], show y ∉ [x], rw [mem_singleton], exact h.symm }
/-! ### bounded quantifiers over lists -/
theorem forall_mem_nil (p : α → Prop) : ∀ x ∈ @nil α, p x.
@[simp] theorem forall_mem_cons' {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α} :
(∀ (x : α), x = a ∨ x ∈ l → p x) ↔ p a ∧ ∀ x ∈ l, p x :=
by simp only [or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, forall_eq]
theorem forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α} :
(∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∧ ∀ x ∈ l, p x :=
by simp only [mem_cons_iff, forall_mem_cons']
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
∀ x ∈ l, p x :=
(forall_mem_cons.1 h).2
theorem forall_mem_singleton {p : α → Prop} {a : α} : (∀ x ∈ [a], p x) ↔ p a :=
by simp only [mem_singleton, forall_eq]
theorem forall_mem_append {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
(∀ x ∈ l₁ ++ l₂, p x) ↔ (∀ x ∈ l₁, p x) ∧ (∀ x ∈ l₂, p x) :=
by simp only [mem_append, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
theorem not_exists_mem_nil (p : α → Prop) : ¬ ∃ x ∈ @nil α, p x.
theorem exists_mem_cons_of {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (l : list α) (h : p a) :
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
bex.intro a (mem_cons_self _ _) h
theorem exists_mem_cons_of_exists {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α} (h : ∃ x ∈ l, p x) :
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
bex.elim h (λ x xl px, bex.intro x (mem_cons_of_mem _ xl) px)
theorem or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α} (h : ∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
bex.elim h (λ x xal px,
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xal)
(assume : x = a, begin rw ←this, left, exact px end)
(assume : x ∈ l, or.inr (bex.intro x this px)))
theorem exists_mem_cons_iff (p : α → Prop) (a : α) (l : list α) :
(∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
iff.intro or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons
(assume h, or.elim h (exists_mem_cons_of l) exists_mem_cons_of_exists)
/-! ### list subset -/
theorem subset_def {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ ⊆ l₂ ↔ ∀ ⦃a : α⦄, a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ := iff.rfl
theorem subset_append_of_subset_left (l l₁ l₂ : list α) : l ⊆ l₁ → l ⊆ l₁++l₂ :=
λ s, subset.trans s $ subset_append_left _ _
theorem subset_append_of_subset_right (l l₁ l₂ : list α) : l ⊆ l₂ → l ⊆ l₁++l₂ :=
λ s, subset.trans s $ subset_append_right _ _
@[simp] theorem cons_subset {a : α} {l m : list α} :
a::l ⊆ m ↔ a ∈ m ∧ l ⊆ m :=
by simp only [subset_def, mem_cons_iff, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, forall_eq]
theorem cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : list α}
(ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) : a::l ⊆ m :=
cons_subset.2 ⟨ainm, lsubm⟩
theorem append_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
λ a h, (mem_append.1 h).elim (@l₁subl _) (@l₂subl _)
@[simp] theorem append_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ l : list α} :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l ↔ l₁ ⊆ l ∧ l₂ ⊆ l :=
begin
split,
{ intro h, simp only [subset_def] at *, split; intros; simp* },
{ rintro ⟨h1, h2⟩, apply append_subset_of_subset_of_subset h1 h2 }
end
theorem eq_nil_of_subset_nil : ∀ {l : list α}, l ⊆ [] → l = []
| [] s := rfl
| (a::l) s := false.elim $ s $ mem_cons_self a l
theorem eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem {l : list α} : l = [] ↔ ∀ a, a ∉ l :=
show l = [] ↔ l ⊆ [], from ⟨λ e, e ▸ subset.refl _, eq_nil_of_subset_nil⟩
theorem map_subset {l₁ l₂ : list α} (f : α → β) (H : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ :=
λ x, by simp only [mem_map, not_and, exists_imp_distrib, and_imp]; exact λ a h e, ⟨a, H h, e⟩
theorem map_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} (f : α → β) (h : injective f) : map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
begin
refine ⟨_, map_subset f⟩, intros h2 x hx,
rcases mem_map.1 (h2 (mem_map_of_mem f hx)) with ⟨x', hx', hxx'⟩,
cases h hxx', exact hx'
end
/-! ### append -/
lemma append_eq_has_append {L₁ L₂ : list α} : list.append L₁ L₂ = L₁ ++ L₂ := rfl
theorem append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_left (s t : list α) : s ≠ [] → s ++ t ≠ [] :=
by induction s; intros; contradiction
theorem append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right (s t : list α) : t ≠ [] → s ++ t ≠ [] :=
by induction s; intros; contradiction
@[simp] lemma append_eq_nil {p q : list α} : (p ++ q) = [] ↔ p = [] ∧ q = [] :=
by cases p; simp only [nil_append, cons_append, eq_self_iff_true, true_and, false_and]
@[simp] lemma nil_eq_append_iff {a b : list α} : [] = a ++ b ↔ a = [] ∧ b = [] :=
by rw [eq_comm, append_eq_nil]
lemma append_eq_cons_iff {a b c : list α} {x : α} :
a ++ b = x :: c ↔ (a = [] ∧ b = x :: c) ∨ (∃a', a = x :: a' ∧ c = a' ++ b) :=
by cases a; simp only [and_assoc, @eq_comm _ c, nil_append, cons_append, eq_self_iff_true,
true_and, false_and, exists_false, false_or, or_false, exists_and_distrib_left, exists_eq_left']
lemma cons_eq_append_iff {a b c : list α} {x : α} :
(x :: c : list α) = a ++ b ↔ (a = [] ∧ b = x :: c) ∨ (∃a', a = x :: a' ∧ c = a' ++ b) :=
by rw [eq_comm, append_eq_cons_iff]
lemma append_eq_append_iff {a b c d : list α} :
a ++ b = c ++ d ↔ (∃a', c = a ++ a' ∧ b = a' ++ d) ∨ (∃c', a = c ++ c' ∧ d = c' ++ b) :=
begin
induction a generalizing c,
case nil { rw nil_append, split,
{ rintro rfl, left, exact ⟨_, rfl, rfl⟩ },
{ rintro (⟨a', rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨a', H, rfl⟩), {refl}, {rw [← append_assoc, ← H], refl} } },
case cons : a as ih {
cases c,
{ simp only [cons_append, nil_append, false_and, exists_false, false_or, exists_eq_left'], exact eq_comm },
{ simp only [cons_append, @eq_comm _ a, ih, and_assoc, and_or_distrib_left, exists_and_distrib_left] } }
end
@[simp] theorem split_at_eq_take_drop : ∀ (n : ℕ) (l : list α), split_at n l = (take n l, drop n l)
| 0 a := rfl
| (succ n) [] := rfl
| (succ n) (x :: xs) := by simp only [split_at, split_at_eq_take_drop n xs, take, drop]
@[simp] theorem take_append_drop : ∀ (n : ℕ) (l : list α), take n l ++ drop n l = l
| 0 a := rfl
| (succ n) [] := rfl
| (succ n) (x :: xs) := congr_arg (cons x) $ take_append_drop n xs
-- TODO(Leo): cleanup proof after arith dec proc
theorem append_inj : ∀ {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α}, s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂ → length s₁ = length s₂ → s₁ = s₂ ∧ t₁ = t₂
| [] [] t₁ t₂ h hl := ⟨rfl, h⟩
| (a::s₁) [] t₁ t₂ h hl := list.no_confusion $ eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero hl
| [] (b::s₂) t₁ t₂ h hl := list.no_confusion $ eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero hl.symm
| (a::s₁) (b::s₂) t₁ t₂ h hl := list.no_confusion h $ λab hap,
let ⟨e1, e2⟩ := @append_inj s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ hap (succ.inj hl) in
by rw [ab, e1, e2]; exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
theorem append_inj_right {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂) (hl : length s₁ = length s₂) : t₁ = t₂ :=
(append_inj h hl).right
theorem append_inj_left {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂) (hl : length s₁ = length s₂) : s₁ = s₂ :=
(append_inj h hl).left
theorem append_inj' {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂) (hl : length t₁ = length t₂) : s₁ = s₂ ∧ t₁ = t₂ :=
append_inj h $ @nat.add_right_cancel _ (length t₁) _ $
let hap := congr_arg length h in by simp only [length_append] at hap; rwa [← hl] at hap
theorem append_inj_right' {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂) (hl : length t₁ = length t₂) : t₁ = t₂ :=
(append_inj' h hl).right
theorem append_inj_left' {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂) (hl : length t₁ = length t₂) : s₁ = s₂ :=
(append_inj' h hl).left
theorem append_left_cancel {s t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s ++ t₁ = s ++ t₂) : t₁ = t₂ :=
append_inj_right h rfl
theorem append_right_cancel {s₁ s₂ t : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t = s₂ ++ t) : s₁ = s₂ :=
append_inj_left' h rfl
theorem append_right_inj {t₁ t₂ : list α} (s) : s ++ t₁ = s ++ t₂ ↔ t₁ = t₂ :=
⟨append_left_cancel, congr_arg _⟩
theorem append_left_inj {s₁ s₂ : list α} (t) : s₁ ++ t = s₂ ++ t ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
⟨append_right_cancel, congr_arg _⟩
theorem map_eq_append_split {f : α → β} {l : list α} {s₁ s₂ : list β}
(h : map f l = s₁ ++ s₂) : ∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ map f l₁ = s₁ ∧ map f l₂ = s₂ :=
begin
have := h, rw [← take_append_drop (length s₁) l] at this ⊢,
rw map_append at this,
refine ⟨_, _, rfl, append_inj this _⟩,
rw [length_map, length_take, min_eq_left],
rw [← length_map f l, h, length_append],
apply nat.le_add_right
end
/-! ### repeat -/
@[simp] theorem repeat_succ (a : α) (n) : repeat a (n + 1) = a :: repeat a n := rfl
theorem eq_of_mem_repeat {a b : α} : ∀ {n}, b ∈ repeat a n → b = a
| (n+1) h := or.elim h id $ @eq_of_mem_repeat _
theorem eq_repeat_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l : list α}, (∀ b ∈ l, b = a) → l = repeat a l.length
| [] H := rfl
| (b::l) H := by cases forall_mem_cons.1 H with H₁ H₂;
unfold length repeat; congr; [exact H₁, exact eq_repeat_of_mem H₂]
theorem eq_repeat' {a : α} {l : list α} : l = repeat a l.length ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a :=
⟨λ h, h.symm ▸ λ b, eq_of_mem_repeat, eq_repeat_of_mem⟩
theorem eq_repeat {a : α} {n} {l : list α} : l = repeat a n ↔ length l = n ∧ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a :=
⟨λ h, h.symm ▸ ⟨length_repeat _ _, λ b, eq_of_mem_repeat⟩,
λ ⟨e, al⟩, e ▸ eq_repeat_of_mem al⟩
theorem repeat_add (a : α) (m n) : repeat a (m + n) = repeat a m ++ repeat a n :=
by induction m; simp only [*, zero_add, succ_add, repeat]; split; refl
theorem repeat_subset_singleton (a : α) (n) : repeat a n ⊆ [a] :=
λ b h, mem_singleton.2 (eq_of_mem_repeat h)
@[simp] theorem map_const (l : list α) (b : β) : map (function.const α b) l = repeat b l.length :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, map]]; split; refl
theorem eq_of_mem_map_const {b₁ b₂ : β} {l : list α} (h : b₁ ∈ map (function.const α b₂) l) : b₁ = b₂ :=
by rw map_const at h; exact eq_of_mem_repeat h
@[simp] theorem map_repeat (f : α → β) (a : α) (n) : map f (repeat a n) = repeat (f a) n :=
by induction n; [refl, simp only [*, repeat, map]]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem tail_repeat (a : α) (n) : tail (repeat a n) = repeat a n.pred :=
by cases n; refl
@[simp] theorem join_repeat_nil (n : ℕ) : join (repeat [] n) = @nil α :=
by induction n; [refl, simp only [*, repeat, join, append_nil]]
/-! ### pure -/
@[simp] theorem mem_pure {α} (x y : α) :
x ∈ (pure y : list α) ↔ x = y := by simp! [pure,list.ret]
/-! ### bind -/
@[simp] theorem bind_eq_bind {α β} (f : α → list β) (l : list α) :
l >>= f = l.bind f := rfl
@[simp] theorem bind_append (f : α → list β) (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).bind f = l₁.bind f ++ l₂.bind f :=
append_bind _ _ _
/-! ### concat -/
theorem concat_nil (a : α) : concat [] a = [a] := rfl
theorem concat_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) : concat (a :: l) b = a :: concat l b := rfl
@[simp] theorem concat_eq_append (a : α) (l : list α) : concat l a = l ++ [a] :=
by induction l; simp only [*, concat]; split; refl
theorem concat_ne_nil (a : α) (l : list α) : concat l a ≠ [] :=
by simp
theorem concat_append (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : list α) : concat l₁ a ++ l₂ = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ :=
by simp
theorem length_concat (a : α) (l : list α) : length (concat l a) = succ (length l) :=
by simp only [concat_eq_append, length_append, length]
theorem append_concat (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ++ concat l₂ a = concat (l₁ ++ l₂) a :=
by simp
/-! ### reverse -/
@[simp] theorem reverse_nil : reverse (@nil α) = [] := rfl
local attribute [simp] reverse_core
@[simp] theorem reverse_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : reverse (a::l) = reverse l ++ [a] :=
have aux : ∀ l₁ l₂, reverse_core l₁ l₂ ++ [a] = reverse_core l₁ (l₂ ++ [a]),
by intro l₁; induction l₁; intros; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_core, cons_append]],
(aux l nil).symm
theorem reverse_core_eq (l₁ l₂ : list α) : reverse_core l₁ l₂ = reverse l₁ ++ l₂ :=
by induction l₁ generalizing l₂; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_core, reverse_cons, append_assoc]]; refl
theorem reverse_cons' (a : α) (l : list α) : reverse (a::l) = concat (reverse l) a :=
by simp only [reverse_cons, concat_eq_append]
@[simp] theorem reverse_singleton (a : α) : reverse [a] = [a] := rfl
@[simp] theorem reverse_append (s t : list α) : reverse (s ++ t) = (reverse t) ++ (reverse s) :=
by induction s; [rw [nil_append, reverse_nil, append_nil],
simp only [*, cons_append, reverse_cons, append_assoc]]
@[simp] theorem reverse_reverse (l : list α) : reverse (reverse l) = l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_cons, reverse_append]]; refl
theorem reverse_injective : injective (@reverse α) :=
injective_of_left_inverse reverse_reverse
@[simp] theorem reverse_inj {l₁ l₂ : list α} : reverse l₁ = reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ = l₂ :=
reverse_injective.eq_iff
@[simp] theorem reverse_eq_nil {l : list α} : reverse l = [] ↔ l = [] :=
@reverse_inj _ l []
theorem concat_eq_reverse_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : concat l a = reverse (a :: reverse l) :=
by simp only [concat_eq_append, reverse_cons, reverse_reverse]
@[simp] theorem length_reverse (l : list α) : length (reverse l) = length l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_cons, length_append, length]]
@[simp] theorem map_reverse (f : α → β) (l : list α) : map f (reverse l) = reverse (map f l) :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, map, reverse_cons, map_append]]
theorem map_reverse_core (f : α → β) (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
map f (reverse_core l₁ l₂) = reverse_core (map f l₁) (map f l₂) :=
by simp only [reverse_core_eq, map_append, map_reverse]
@[simp] theorem mem_reverse {a : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ reverse l ↔ a ∈ l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_cons, mem_append, mem_singleton, mem_cons_iff, not_mem_nil, false_or, or_false, or_comm]]
@[simp] theorem reverse_repeat (a : α) (n) : reverse (repeat a n) = repeat a n :=
eq_repeat.2 ⟨by simp only [length_reverse, length_repeat], λ b h, eq_of_mem_repeat (mem_reverse.1 h)⟩
/-- Induction principle from the right for lists: if a property holds for the empty list, and
for `l ++ [a]` if it holds for `l`, then it holds for all lists. The principle is given for
a `Sort`-valued predicate, i.e., it can also be used to construct data. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] def reverse_rec_on {C : list α → Sort*}
(l : list α) (H0 : C [])
(H1 : ∀ (l : list α) (a : α), C l → C (l ++ [a])) : C l :=
begin
rw ← reverse_reverse l,
induction reverse l,
{ exact H0 },
{ rw reverse_cons, exact H1 _ _ ih }
end
/-! ### is_nil -/
lemma is_nil_iff_eq_nil {l : list α} : l.is_nil ↔ l = [] :=
list.cases_on l (by simp [is_nil]) (by simp [is_nil])
/-! ### last -/
@[simp] theorem last_cons {a : α} {l : list α} :
∀ (h₁ : a :: l ≠ nil) (h₂ : l ≠ nil), last (a :: l) h₁ = last l h₂ :=
by {induction l; intros, contradiction, reflexivity}
@[simp] theorem last_append {a : α} (l : list α) (h : l ++ [a] ≠ []) : last (l ++ [a]) h = a :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [cons_append, last_cons _ (λ H, cons_ne_nil _ _ (append_eq_nil.1 H).2), *]]
theorem last_concat {a : α} (l : list α) (h : concat l a ≠ []) : last (concat l a) h = a :=
by simp only [concat_eq_append, last_append]
@[simp] theorem last_singleton (a : α) (h : [a] ≠ []) : last [a] h = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem last_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (l : list α) (h : a₁::a₂::l ≠ []) :
last (a₁::a₂::l) h = last (a₂::l) (cons_ne_nil a₂ l) := rfl
theorem last_congr {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h₁ : l₁ ≠ []) (h₂ : l₂ ≠ []) (h₃ : l₁ = l₂) :
last l₁ h₁ = last l₂ h₂ :=
by subst l₁
theorem last_mem : ∀ {l : list α} (h : l ≠ []), last l h ∈ l
| [] h := absurd rfl h
| [a] h := or.inl rfl
| (a::b::l) h := or.inr $ by { rw [last_cons_cons], exact last_mem (cons_ne_nil b l) }
/-! ### last' -/
@[simp] theorem last'_is_none :
∀ {l : list α}, (last' l).is_none ↔ l = []
| [] := by simp
| [a] := by simp
| (a::b::l) := by simp [@last'_is_none (b::l)]
@[simp] theorem last'_is_some : ∀ {l : list α}, l.last'.is_some ↔ l ≠ []
| [] := by simp
| [a] := by simp
| (a::b::l) := by simp [@last'_is_some (b::l)]
theorem mem_last'_eq_last : ∀ {l : list α} {x : α}, x ∈ l.last' → ∃ h, x = last l h
| [] x hx := false.elim $ by simpa using hx
| [a] x hx := have a = x, by simpa using hx, this ▸ ⟨cons_ne_nil a [], rfl⟩
| (a::b::l) x hx :=
begin
rw last' at hx,
rcases mem_last'_eq_last hx with ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
use cons_ne_nil _ _,
rwa [last_cons]
end
theorem mem_of_mem_last' {l : list α} {a : α} (ha : a ∈ l.last') : a ∈ l :=
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := mem_last'_eq_last ha in h₂.symm ▸ last_mem _
theorem init_append_last' : ∀ {l : list α} (a ∈ l.last'), init l ++ [a] = l
| [] a ha := (option.not_mem_none a ha).elim
| [a] _ rfl := rfl
| (a :: b :: l) c hc := by { rw [last'] at hc, rw [init, cons_append, init_append_last' _ hc] }
theorem ilast_eq_last' [inhabited α] : ∀ l : list α, l.ilast = l.last'.iget
| [] := by simp [ilast, arbitrary]
| [a] := rfl
| [a, b] := rfl
| [a, b, c] := rfl
| (a :: b :: c :: l) := by simp [ilast, ilast_eq_last' (c :: l)]
@[simp] theorem last'_append_cons : ∀ (l₁ : list α) (a : α) (l₂ : list α),
last' (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) = last' (a :: l₂)
| [] a l₂ := rfl
| [b] a l₂ := rfl
| (b::c::l₁) a l₂ := by rw [cons_append, cons_append, last', ← cons_append, last'_append_cons]
theorem last'_append_of_ne_nil (l₁ : list α) : ∀ {l₂ : list α} (hl₂ : l₂ ≠ []),
last' (l₁ ++ l₂) = last' l₂
| [] hl₂ := by contradiction
| (b::l₂) _ := last'_append_cons l₁ b l₂
/-! ### head(') and tail -/
theorem head_eq_head' [inhabited α] (l : list α) : head l = (head' l).iget :=
by cases l; refl
theorem mem_of_mem_head' {x : α} : ∀ {l : list α}, x ∈ l.head' → x ∈ l
| [] h := (option.not_mem_none _ h).elim
| (a::l) h := by { simp only [head', option.mem_def] at h, exact h ▸ or.inl rfl }
@[simp] theorem head_cons [inhabited α] (a : α) (l : list α) : head (a::l) = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem tail_nil : tail (@nil α) = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem tail_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : tail (a::l) = l := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_append [inhabited α] (t : list α) {s : list α} (h : s ≠ []) : head (s ++ t) = head s :=
by {induction s, contradiction, refl}
theorem cons_head'_tail : ∀ {l : list α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ head' l), a :: tail l = l
| [] a h := by contradiction
| (b::l) a h := by { simp at h, simp [h] }
theorem head_mem_head' [inhabited α] : ∀ {l : list α} (h : l ≠ []), head l ∈ head' l
| [] h := by contradiction
| (a::l) h := rfl
theorem cons_head_tail [inhabited α] {l : list α} (h : l ≠ []) : (head l)::(tail l) = l :=
cons_head'_tail (head_mem_head' h)
@[simp] theorem head'_map (f : α → β) (l) : head' (map f l) = (head' l).map f := by cases l; refl
/-! ### sublists -/
@[simp] theorem nil_sublist : Π (l : list α), [] <+ l
| [] := sublist.slnil
| (a :: l) := sublist.cons _ _ a (nil_sublist l)
@[refl, simp] theorem sublist.refl : Π (l : list α), l <+ l
| [] := sublist.slnil
| (a :: l) := sublist.cons2 _ _ a (sublist.refl l)
@[trans] theorem sublist.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α} (h₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ <+ l₃) : l₁ <+ l₃ :=
sublist.rec_on h₂ (λ_ s, s)
(λl₂ l₃ a h₂ IH l₁ h₁, sublist.cons _ _ _ (IH l₁ h₁))
(λl₂ l₃ a h₂ IH l₁ h₁, @sublist.cases_on _ (λl₁ l₂', l₂' = a :: l₂ → l₁ <+ a :: l₃) _ _ h₁
(λ_, nil_sublist _)
(λl₁ l₂' a' h₁' e, match a', l₂', e, h₁' with ._, ._, rfl, h₁ := sublist.cons _ _ _ (IH _ h₁) end)
(λl₁ l₂' a' h₁' e, match a', l₂', e, h₁' with ._, ._, rfl, h₁ := sublist.cons2 _ _ _ (IH _ h₁) end) rfl)
l₁ h₁
@[simp] theorem sublist_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : l <+ a::l :=
sublist.cons _ _ _ (sublist.refl l)
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : a::l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
sublist.trans (sublist_cons a l₁)
theorem cons_sublist_cons {l₁ l₂ : list α} (a : α) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : a::l₁ <+ a::l₂ :=
sublist.cons2 _ _ _ s
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_left : Π (l₁ l₂ : list α), l₁ <+ l₁++l₂
| [] l₂ := nil_sublist _
| (a::l₁) l₂ := cons_sublist_cons _ (sublist_append_left l₁ l₂)
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_right : Π (l₁ l₂ : list α), l₂ <+ l₁++l₂
| [] l₂ := sublist.refl _
| (a::l₁) l₂ := sublist.cons _ _ _ (sublist_append_right l₁ l₂)
theorem sublist_cons_of_sublist (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ <+ a::l₂ :=
sublist.cons _ _ _
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_left {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l <+ l₁) : l <+ l₁++l₂ :=
s.trans $ sublist_append_left _ _
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_right {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l <+ l₂) : l <+ l₁++l₂ :=
s.trans $ sublist_append_right _ _
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons {l₁ l₂ : list α} : ∀ {a : α}, a::l₁ <+ a::l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂
| ._ (sublist.cons ._ ._ a s) := sublist_of_cons_sublist s
| ._ (sublist.cons2 ._ ._ a s) := s
theorem cons_sublist_cons_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a::l₁ <+ a::l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons, cons_sublist_cons _⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} : ∀ l, l++l₁ <+ l++l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂
| [] := iff.rfl
| (a::l) := cons_sublist_cons_iff.trans (append_sublist_append_left l)
theorem sublist.append_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) (l) : l₁++l <+ l₂++l :=
begin
induction h with _ _ a _ ih _ _ a _ ih,
{ refl },
{ apply sublist_cons_of_sublist a ih },
{ apply cons_sublist_cons a ih }
end
theorem sublist_or_mem_of_sublist {l l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} (h : l <+ l₁ ++ a::l₂) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ ∨ a ∈ l :=
begin
induction l₁ with b l₁ IH generalizing l,
{ cases h, { left, exact ‹l <+ l₂› }, { right, apply mem_cons_self } },
{ cases h with _ _ _ h _ _ _ h,
{ exact or.imp_left (sublist_cons_of_sublist _) (IH h) },
{ exact (IH h).imp (cons_sublist_cons _) (mem_cons_of_mem _) } }
end
theorem sublist.reverse {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse :=
begin
induction h with _ _ _ _ ih _ _ a _ ih, {refl},
{ rw reverse_cons, exact sublist_append_of_sublist_left ih },
{ rw [reverse_cons, reverse_cons], exact ih.append_right [a] }
end
@[simp] theorem reverse_sublist_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨λ h, l₁.reverse_reverse ▸ l₂.reverse_reverse ▸ h.reverse, sublist.reverse⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} (l) : l₁++l <+ l₂++l ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨λ h, by simpa only [reverse_append, append_sublist_append_left, reverse_sublist_iff] using h.reverse,
λ h, h.append_right l⟩
theorem sublist.append {l₁ l₂ r₁ r₂ : list α}
(hl : l₁ <+ l₂) (hr : r₁ <+ r₂) : l₁ ++ r₁ <+ l₂ ++ r₂ :=
(hl.append_right _).trans ((append_sublist_append_left _).2 hr)
theorem sublist.subset : Π {l₁ l₂ : list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂
| ._ ._ sublist.slnil b h := h
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons l₁ l₂ a s) b h := mem_cons_of_mem _ (sublist.subset s h)
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons2 l₁ l₂ a s) b h :=
match eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h with
| or.inl h := h ▸ mem_cons_self _ _
| or.inr h := mem_cons_of_mem _ (sublist.subset s h)
end
theorem singleton_sublist {a : α} {l} : [a] <+ l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨λ h, h.subset (mem_singleton_self _), λ h,
let ⟨s, t, e⟩ := mem_split h in e.symm ▸
(cons_sublist_cons _ (nil_sublist _)).trans (sublist_append_right _ _)⟩
theorem eq_nil_of_sublist_nil {l : list α} (s : l <+ []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_subset_nil $ s.subset
theorem repeat_sublist_repeat (a : α) {m n} : repeat a m <+ repeat a n ↔ m ≤ n :=
⟨λ h, by simpa only [length_repeat] using length_le_of_sublist h,
λ h, by induction h; [refl, simp only [*, repeat_succ, sublist.cons]] ⟩
theorem eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂
| ._ ._ sublist.slnil h := rfl
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons l₁ l₂ a s) h :=
absurd (length_le_of_sublist s) $ not_le_of_gt $ by rw h; apply lt_succ_self
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons2 l₁ l₂ a s) h :=
by rw [length, length] at h; injection h with h; rw eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq s h
theorem eq_of_sublist_of_length_le {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) (h : length l₂ ≤ length l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq s (le_antisymm (length_le_of_sublist s) h)
theorem sublist.antisymm {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (s₂ : l₂ <+ l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_le s₁ (length_le_of_sublist s₂)
instance decidable_sublist [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <+ l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true $ nil_sublist _
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ λh, list.no_confusion $ eq_nil_of_sublist_nil h
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) :=
if h : a = b then
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (decidable_sublist l₁ l₂) $
by rw [← h]; exact ⟨cons_sublist_cons _, sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons⟩
else decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (decidable_sublist (a::l₁) l₂)
⟨sublist_cons_of_sublist _, λs, match a, l₁, s, h with
| a, l₁, sublist.cons ._ ._ ._ s', h := s'
| ._, ._, sublist.cons2 t ._ ._ s', h := absurd rfl h
end⟩
/-! ### index_of -/
section index_of
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem index_of_nil (a : α) : index_of a [] = 0 := rfl
theorem index_of_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) : index_of a (b::l) = if a = b then 0 else succ (index_of a l) := rfl
theorem index_of_cons_eq {a b : α} (l : list α) : a = b → index_of a (b::l) = 0 :=
assume e, if_pos e
@[simp] theorem index_of_cons_self (a : α) (l : list α) : index_of a (a::l) = 0 :=
index_of_cons_eq _ rfl
@[simp, priority 990]
theorem index_of_cons_ne {a b : α} (l : list α) : a ≠ b → index_of a (b::l) = succ (index_of a l) :=
assume n, if_neg n
theorem index_of_eq_length {a : α} {l : list α} : index_of a l = length l ↔ a ∉ l :=
begin
induction l with b l ih,
{ exact iff_of_true rfl (not_mem_nil _) },
simp only [length, mem_cons_iff, index_of_cons], split_ifs,
{ exact iff_of_false (by rintro ⟨⟩) (λ H, H $ or.inl h) },
{ simp only [h, false_or], rw ← ih, exact succ_inj' }
end
@[simp, priority 980]
theorem index_of_of_not_mem {l : list α} {a : α} : a ∉ l → index_of a l = length l :=
index_of_eq_length.2
theorem index_of_le_length {a : α} {l : list α} : index_of a l ≤ length l :=
begin
induction l with b l ih, {refl},
simp only [length, index_of_cons],
by_cases h : a = b, {rw if_pos h, exact nat.zero_le _},
rw if_neg h, exact succ_le_succ ih
end
theorem index_of_lt_length {a} {l : list α} : index_of a l < length l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨λh, by_contradiction $ λ al, ne_of_lt h $ index_of_eq_length.2 al,
λal, lt_of_le_of_ne index_of_le_length $ λ h, index_of_eq_length.1 h al⟩
end index_of
/-! ### nth element -/
theorem nth_le_of_mem : ∀ {a} {l : list α}, a ∈ l → ∃ n h, nth_le l n h = a
| a (_ :: l) (or.inl rfl) := ⟨0, succ_pos _, rfl⟩
| a (b :: l) (or.inr m) :=
let ⟨n, h, e⟩ := nth_le_of_mem m in ⟨n+1, succ_lt_succ h, e⟩
theorem nth_le_nth : ∀ {l : list α} {n} h, nth l n = some (nth_le l n h)
| (a :: l) 0 h := rfl
| (a :: l) (n+1) h := @nth_le_nth l n _
theorem nth_len_le : ∀ {l : list α} {n}, length l ≤ n → nth l n = none
| [] n h := rfl
| (a :: l) (n+1) h := nth_len_le (le_of_succ_le_succ h)
theorem nth_eq_some {l : list α} {n a} : nth l n = some a ↔ ∃ h, nth_le l n h = a :=
⟨λ e,
have h : n < length l, from lt_of_not_ge $ λ hn,
by rw nth_len_le hn at e; contradiction,
⟨h, by rw nth_le_nth h at e;
injection e with e; apply nth_le_mem⟩,
λ ⟨h, e⟩, e ▸ nth_le_nth _⟩
theorem nth_of_mem {a} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : ∃ n, nth l n = some a :=
let ⟨n, h, e⟩ := nth_le_of_mem h in ⟨n, by rw [nth_le_nth, e]⟩
theorem nth_le_mem : ∀ (l : list α) n h, nth_le l n h ∈ l
| (a :: l) 0 h := mem_cons_self _ _
| (a :: l) (n+1) h := mem_cons_of_mem _ (nth_le_mem l _ _)
theorem nth_mem {l : list α} {n a} (e : nth l n = some a) : a ∈ l :=
let ⟨h, e⟩ := nth_eq_some.1 e in e ▸ nth_le_mem _ _ _
theorem mem_iff_nth_le {a} {l : list α} : a ∈ l ↔ ∃ n h, nth_le l n h = a :=
⟨nth_le_of_mem, λ ⟨n, h, e⟩, e ▸ nth_le_mem _ _ _⟩
theorem mem_iff_nth {a} {l : list α} : a ∈ l ↔ ∃ n, nth l n = some a :=
mem_iff_nth_le.trans $ exists_congr $ λ n, nth_eq_some.symm
@[simp] theorem nth_map (f : α → β) : ∀ l n, nth (map f l) n = (nth l n).map f
| [] n := rfl
| (a :: l) 0 := rfl
| (a :: l) (n+1) := nth_map l n
theorem nth_le_map (f : α → β) {l n} (H1 H2) : nth_le (map f l) n H1 = f (nth_le l n H2) :=
option.some.inj $ by rw [← nth_le_nth, nth_map, nth_le_nth]; refl
/-- A version of `nth_le_map` that can be used for rewriting. -/
theorem nth_le_map_rev (f : α → β) {l n} (H) :
f (nth_le l n H) = nth_le (map f l) n ((length_map f l).symm ▸ H) :=
(nth_le_map f _ _).symm
@[simp] theorem nth_le_map' (f : α → β) {l n} (H) :
nth_le (map f l) n H = f (nth_le l n (length_map f l ▸ H)) :=
nth_le_map f _ _
/-- If one has `nth_le L i hi` in a formula and `h : L = L'`, one can not `rw h` in the formula as
`hi` gives `i < L.length` and not `i < L'.length`. The lemma `nth_le_of_eq` can be used to make
such a rewrite, with `rw (nth_le_of_eq h)`. -/
lemma nth_le_of_eq {L L' : list α} (h : L = L') {i : ℕ} (hi : i < L.length) :
nth_le L i hi = nth_le L' i (h ▸ hi) :=
by { congr, exact h}
@[simp] lemma nth_le_singleton (a : α) {n : ℕ} (hn : n < 1) :
nth_le [a] n hn = a :=
have hn0 : n = 0 := le_zero_iff.1 (le_of_lt_succ hn),
by subst hn0; refl
lemma nth_le_zero [inhabited α] {L : list α} (h : 0 < L.length) :
L.nth_le 0 h = L.head :=
by { cases L, cases h, simp, }
lemma nth_le_append : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ} (hn₁) (hn₂),
(l₁ ++ l₂).nth_le n hn₁ = l₁.nth_le n hn₂
| [] _ n hn₁ hn₂ := (not_lt_zero _ hn₂).elim
| (a::l) _ 0 hn₁ hn₂ := rfl
| (a::l) _ (n+1) hn₁ hn₂ := by simp only [nth_le, cons_append];
exact nth_le_append _ _
lemma nth_le_append_right_aux {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ}
(h₁ : l₁.length ≤ n) (h₂ : n < (l₁ ++ l₂).length) : n - l₁.length < l₂.length :=
begin
rw list.length_append at h₂,
convert (nat.sub_lt_sub_right_iff h₁).mpr h₂,
simp,
end
lemma nth_le_append_right : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ} (h₁ : l₁.length ≤ n) (h₂),
(l₁ ++ l₂).nth_le n h₂ = l₂.nth_le (n - l₁.length) (nth_le_append_right_aux h₁ h₂)
| [] _ n h₁ h₂ := rfl
| (a :: l) _ (n+1) h₁ h₂ :=
begin
dsimp,
conv { to_rhs, congr, skip, rw [←nat.sub_sub, nat.sub.right_comm, nat.add_sub_cancel], },
rw nth_le_append_right (nat.lt_succ_iff.mp h₁),
end
@[simp] lemma nth_le_repeat (a : α) {n m : ℕ} (h : m < (list.repeat a n).length) :
(list.repeat a n).nth_le m h = a :=
eq_of_mem_repeat (nth_le_mem _ _ _)
lemma nth_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n < l₁.length) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).nth n = l₁.nth n :=
have hn' : n < (l₁ ++ l₂).length := lt_of_lt_of_le hn
(by rw length_append; exact le_add_right _ _),
by rw [nth_le_nth hn, nth_le_nth hn', nth_le_append]
lemma last_eq_nth_le : ∀ (l : list α) (h : l ≠ []),
last l h = l.nth_le (l.length - 1) (sub_lt (length_pos_of_ne_nil h) one_pos)
| [] h := rfl
| [a] h := by rw [last_singleton, nth_le_singleton]
| (a :: b :: l) h := by { rw [last_cons, last_eq_nth_le (b :: l)],
refl, exact cons_ne_nil b l }
@[simp] lemma nth_concat_length : ∀ (l : list α) (a : α), (l ++ [a]).nth l.length = some a
| [] a := rfl
| (b::l) a := by rw [cons_append, length_cons, nth, nth_concat_length]
@[ext]
theorem ext : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, (∀n, nth l₁ n = nth l₂ n) → l₁ = l₂
| [] [] h := rfl
| (a::l₁) [] h := by have h0 := h 0; contradiction
| [] (a'::l₂) h := by have h0 := h 0; contradiction
| (a::l₁) (a'::l₂) h := by have h0 : some a = some a' := h 0; injection h0 with aa;
simp only [aa, ext (λn, h (n+1))]; split; refl
theorem ext_le {l₁ l₂ : list α} (hl : length l₁ = length l₂) (h : ∀n h₁ h₂, nth_le l₁ n h₁ = nth_le l₂ n h₂) : l₁ = l₂ :=
ext $ λn, if h₁ : n < length l₁
then by rw [nth_le_nth, nth_le_nth, h n h₁ (by rwa [← hl])]
else let h₁ := le_of_not_gt h₁ in by { rw [nth_len_le h₁, nth_len_le], rwa [←hl], }
@[simp] theorem index_of_nth_le [decidable_eq α] {a : α} : ∀ {l : list α} h, nth_le l (index_of a l) h = a
| (b::l) h := by by_cases h' : a = b; simp only [h', if_pos, if_false, index_of_cons, nth_le, @index_of_nth_le l]
@[simp] theorem index_of_nth [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : nth l (index_of a l) = some a :=
by rw [nth_le_nth, index_of_nth_le (index_of_lt_length.2 h)]
theorem nth_le_reverse_aux1 : ∀ (l r : list α) (i h1 h2), nth_le (reverse_core l r) (i + length l) h1 = nth_le r i h2
| [] r i := λh1 h2, rfl
| (a :: l) r i := by rw (show i + length (a :: l) = i + 1 + length l, from add_right_comm i (length l) 1); exact
λh1 h2, nth_le_reverse_aux1 l (a :: r) (i+1) h1 (succ_lt_succ h2)
lemma index_of_inj [decidable_eq α] {l : list α} {x y : α}
(hx : x ∈ l) (hy : y ∈ l) : index_of x l = index_of y l ↔ x = y :=
⟨λ h, have nth_le l (index_of x l) (index_of_lt_length.2 hx) =
nth_le l (index_of y l) (index_of_lt_length.2 hy),
by simp only [h],
by simpa only [index_of_nth_le],
λ h, by subst h⟩
theorem nth_le_reverse_aux2 : ∀ (l r : list α) (i : nat) (h1) (h2),
nth_le (reverse_core l r) (length l - 1 - i) h1 = nth_le l i h2
| [] r i h1 h2 := absurd h2 (not_lt_zero _)
| (a :: l) r 0 h1 h2 := begin
have aux := nth_le_reverse_aux1 l (a :: r) 0,
rw zero_add at aux,
exact aux _ (zero_lt_succ _)
end
| (a :: l) r (i+1) h1 h2 := begin
have aux := nth_le_reverse_aux2 l (a :: r) i,
have heq := calc length (a :: l) - 1 - (i + 1)
= length l - (1 + i) : by rw add_comm; refl
... = length l - 1 - i : by rw nat.sub_sub,
rw [← heq] at aux,
apply aux
end
@[simp] theorem nth_le_reverse (l : list α) (i : nat) (h1 h2) :
nth_le (reverse l) (length l - 1 - i) h1 = nth_le l i h2 :=
nth_le_reverse_aux2 _ _ _ _ _
lemma eq_cons_of_length_one {l : list α} (h : l.length = 1) :
l = [l.nth_le 0 (h.symm ▸ zero_lt_one)] :=
begin
refine ext_le (by convert h) (λ n h₁ h₂, _),
simp only [nth_le_singleton],
congr,
exact eq_bot_iff.mpr (nat.lt_succ_iff.mp h₂)
end
lemma modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail {f g : list α → list α} (m : ℕ) :
∀n (l:list α), (l.modify_nth_tail f n).modify_nth_tail g (m + n) =
l.modify_nth_tail (λl, (f l).modify_nth_tail g m) n
| 0 l := rfl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := congr_arg (list.cons a) (modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail n l)
lemma modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_le
{f g : list α → list α} (m n : ℕ) (l : list α) (h : n ≤ m) :
(l.modify_nth_tail f n).modify_nth_tail g m =
l.modify_nth_tail (λl, (f l).modify_nth_tail g (m - n)) n :=
begin
rcases le_iff_exists_add.1 h with ⟨m, rfl⟩,
rw [nat.add_sub_cancel_left, add_comm, modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail]
end
lemma modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_same {f g : list α → list α} (n : ℕ) (l:list α) :
(l.modify_nth_tail f n).modify_nth_tail g n = l.modify_nth_tail (g ∘ f) n :=
by rw [modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_le n n l (le_refl n), nat.sub_self]; refl
lemma modify_nth_tail_id :
∀n (l:list α), l.modify_nth_tail id n = l
| 0 l := rfl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := congr_arg (list.cons a) (modify_nth_tail_id n l)
theorem remove_nth_eq_nth_tail : ∀ n (l : list α), remove_nth l n = modify_nth_tail tail n l
| 0 l := by cases l; refl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := congr_arg (cons _) (remove_nth_eq_nth_tail _ _)
theorem update_nth_eq_modify_nth (a : α) : ∀ n (l : list α),
update_nth l n a = modify_nth (λ _, a) n l
| 0 l := by cases l; refl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (b::l) := congr_arg (cons _) (update_nth_eq_modify_nth _ _)
theorem modify_nth_eq_update_nth (f : α → α) : ∀ n (l : list α),
modify_nth f n l = ((λ a, update_nth l n (f a)) <$> nth l n).get_or_else l
| 0 l := by cases l; refl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (b::l) := (congr_arg (cons b)
(modify_nth_eq_update_nth n l)).trans $ by cases nth l n; refl
theorem nth_modify_nth (f : α → α) : ∀ n (l : list α) m,
nth (modify_nth f n l) m = (λ a, if n = m then f a else a) <$> nth l m
| n l 0 := by cases l; cases n; refl
| n [] (m+1) := by cases n; refl
| 0 (a::l) (m+1) := by cases nth l m; refl
| (n+1) (a::l) (m+1) := (nth_modify_nth n l m).trans $
by cases nth l m with b; by_cases n = m;
simp only [h, if_pos, if_true, if_false, option.map_none, option.map_some, mt succ_inj, not_false_iff]
theorem modify_nth_tail_length (f : list α → list α) (H : ∀ l, length (f l) = length l) :
∀ n l, length (modify_nth_tail f n l) = length l
| 0 l := H _
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := @congr_arg _ _ _ _ (+1) (modify_nth_tail_length _ _)
@[simp] theorem modify_nth_length (f : α → α) :
∀ n l, length (modify_nth f n l) = length l :=
modify_nth_tail_length _ (λ l, by cases l; refl)
@[simp] theorem update_nth_length (l : list α) (n) (a : α) :
length (update_nth l n a) = length l :=
by simp only [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, modify_nth_length]
@[simp] theorem nth_modify_nth_eq (f : α → α) (n) (l : list α) :
nth (modify_nth f n l) n = f <$> nth l n :=
by simp only [nth_modify_nth, if_pos]
@[simp] theorem nth_modify_nth_ne (f : α → α) {m n} (l : list α) (h : m ≠ n) :
nth (modify_nth f m l) n = nth l n :=
by simp only [nth_modify_nth, if_neg h, id_map']
theorem nth_update_nth_eq (a : α) (n) (l : list α) :
nth (update_nth l n a) n = (λ _, a) <$> nth l n :=
by simp only [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, nth_modify_nth_eq]
theorem nth_update_nth_of_lt (a : α) {n} {l : list α} (h : n < length l) :
nth (update_nth l n a) n = some a :=
by rw [nth_update_nth_eq, nth_le_nth h]; refl
theorem nth_update_nth_ne (a : α) {m n} (l : list α) (h : m ≠ n) :
nth (update_nth l m a) n = nth l n :=
by simp only [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, nth_modify_nth_ne _ _ h]
@[simp] lemma nth_le_update_nth_eq (l : list α) (i : ℕ) (a : α)
(h : i < (l.update_nth i a).length) : (l.update_nth i a).nth_le i h = a :=
by rw [← option.some_inj, ← nth_le_nth, nth_update_nth_eq, nth_le_nth]; simp * at *
@[simp] lemma nth_le_update_nth_of_ne {l : list α} {i j : ℕ} (h : i ≠ j) (a : α)
(hj : j < (l.update_nth i a).length) :
(l.update_nth i a).nth_le j hj = l.nth_le j (by simpa using hj) :=
by rw [← option.some_inj, ← list.nth_le_nth, list.nth_update_nth_ne _ _ h, list.nth_le_nth]
lemma mem_or_eq_of_mem_update_nth : ∀ {l : list α} {n : ℕ} {a b : α}
(h : a ∈ l.update_nth n b), a ∈ l ∨ a = b
| [] n a b h := false.elim h
| (c::l) 0 a b h := ((mem_cons_iff _ _ _).1 h).elim
or.inr (or.inl ∘ mem_cons_of_mem _)
| (c::l) (n+1) a b h := ((mem_cons_iff _ _ _).1 h).elim
(λ h, h ▸ or.inl (mem_cons_self _ _))
(λ h, (mem_or_eq_of_mem_update_nth h).elim
(or.inl ∘ mem_cons_of_mem _) or.inr)
section insert_nth
variable {a : α}
@[simp] lemma insert_nth_nil (a : α) : insert_nth 0 a [] = [a] := rfl
lemma length_insert_nth : ∀n as, n ≤ length as → length (insert_nth n a as) = length as + 1
| 0 as h := rfl
| (n+1) [] h := (nat.not_succ_le_zero _ h).elim
| (n+1) (a'::as) h := congr_arg nat.succ $ length_insert_nth n as (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h)
lemma remove_nth_insert_nth (n:ℕ) (l : list α) : (l.insert_nth n a).remove_nth n = l :=
by rw [remove_nth_eq_nth_tail, insert_nth, modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_same];
from modify_nth_tail_id _ _
lemma insert_nth_remove_nth_of_ge : ∀n m as, n < length as → m ≥ n →
insert_nth m a (as.remove_nth n) = (as.insert_nth (m + 1) a).remove_nth n
| 0 0 [] has _ := (lt_irrefl _ has).elim
| 0 0 (a::as) has hmn := by simp [remove_nth, insert_nth]
| 0 (m+1) (a::as) has hmn := rfl
| (n+1) (m+1) (a::as) has hmn :=
congr_arg (cons a) $
insert_nth_remove_nth_of_ge n m as (nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ has) (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ hmn)
lemma insert_nth_remove_nth_of_le : ∀n m as, n < length as → m ≤ n →
insert_nth m a (as.remove_nth n) = (as.insert_nth m a).remove_nth (n + 1)
| n 0 (a :: as) has hmn := rfl
| (n + 1) (m + 1) (a :: as) has hmn :=
congr_arg (cons a) $
insert_nth_remove_nth_of_le n m as (nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ has) (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ hmn)
lemma insert_nth_comm (a b : α) :
∀(i j : ℕ) (l : list α) (h : i ≤ j) (hj : j ≤ length l),
(l.insert_nth i a).insert_nth (j + 1) b = (l.insert_nth j b).insert_nth i a
| 0 j l := by simp [insert_nth]
| (i + 1) 0 l := assume h, (nat.not_lt_zero _ h).elim
| (i + 1) (j+1) [] := by simp
| (i + 1) (j+1) (c::l) :=
assume h₀ h₁,
by simp [insert_nth]; exact insert_nth_comm i j l (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h₀) (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h₁)
lemma mem_insert_nth {a b : α} : ∀ {n : ℕ} {l : list α} (hi : n ≤ l.length),
a ∈ l.insert_nth n b ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ l
| 0 as h := iff.rfl
| (n+1) [] h := (nat.not_succ_le_zero _ h).elim
| (n+1) (a'::as) h := begin
dsimp [list.insert_nth],
erw [list.mem_cons_iff, mem_insert_nth (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h), list.mem_cons_iff,
← or.assoc, or_comm (a = a'), or.assoc]
end
end insert_nth
/-! ### map -/
@[simp] lemma map_nil (f : α → β) : map f [] = [] := rfl
lemma map_congr {f g : α → β} : ∀ {l : list α}, (∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) → map f l = map g l
| [] _ := rfl
| (a::l) h := let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := forall_mem_cons.1 h in
by rw [map, map, h₁, map_congr h₂]
lemma map_eq_map_iff {f g : α → β} {l : list α} : map f l = map g l ↔ (∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) :=
begin
refine ⟨_, map_congr⟩, intros h x hx,
rw [mem_iff_nth_le] at hx, rcases hx with ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩,
rw [nth_le_map_rev f, nth_le_map_rev g], congr, exact h
end
theorem map_concat (f : α → β) (a : α) (l : list α) : map f (concat l a) = concat (map f l) (f a) :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, concat_eq_append, cons_append, map, map_append]]; split; refl
theorem map_id' {f : α → α} (h : ∀ x, f x = x) (l : list α) : map f l = l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, map]]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem foldl_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → γ → α) (a : α) (l : list β) :
foldl f a (map g l) = foldl (λx y, f x (g y)) a l :=
by revert a; induction l; intros; [refl, simp only [*, map, foldl]]
@[simp] theorem foldr_map (g : β → γ) (f : γ → α → α) (a : α) (l : list β) :
foldr f a (map g l) = foldr (f ∘ g) a l :=
by revert a; induction l; intros; [refl, simp only [*, map, foldr]]
theorem foldl_hom (l : list γ) (f : α → β) (op : α → γ → α) (op' : β → γ → β) (a : α)
(h : ∀a x, f (op a x) = op' (f a) x) : foldl op' (f a) l = f (foldl op a l) :=
eq.symm $ by { revert a, induction l; intros; [refl, simp only [*, foldl]] }
theorem foldr_hom (l : list γ) (f : α → β) (op : γ → α → α) (op' : γ → β → β) (a : α)
(h : ∀x a, f (op x a) = op' x (f a)) : foldr op' (f a) l = f (foldr op a l) :=
by { revert a, induction l; intros; [refl, simp only [*, foldr]] }
theorem eq_nil_of_map_eq_nil {f : α → β} {l : list α} (h : map f l = nil) : l = nil :=
eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero $ by rw [← length_map f l, h]; refl
@[simp] theorem map_join (f : α → β) (L : list (list α)) :
map f (join L) = join (map (map f) L) :=
by induction L; [refl, simp only [*, join, map, map_append]]
theorem bind_ret_eq_map (f : α → β) (l : list α) :
l.bind (list.ret ∘ f) = map f l :=
by unfold list.bind; induction l; simp only [map, join, list.ret, cons_append, nil_append, *]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (l : list α) : f <$> l = map f l := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_tail (f : α → β) (l) : map f (tail l) = tail (map f l) :=
by cases l; refl
@[simp] theorem injective_map_iff {f : α → β} : injective (map f) ↔ injective f :=
begin
split; intros h x y hxy,
{ suffices : [x] = [y], { simpa using this }, apply h, simp [hxy] },
{ induction y generalizing x, simpa using hxy,
cases x, simpa using hxy, simp at hxy, simp [y_ih hxy.2, h hxy.1] }
end
/-! ### map₂ -/
theorem nil_map₂ (f : α → β → γ) (l : list β) : map₂ f [] l = [] :=
by cases l; refl
theorem map₂_nil (f : α → β → γ) (l : list α) : map₂ f l [] = [] :=
by cases l; refl
/-! ### take, drop -/
@[simp] theorem take_zero (l : list α) : take 0 l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem take_nil : ∀ n, take n [] = ([] : list α)
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := rfl
theorem take_cons (n) (a : α) (l : list α) : take (succ n) (a::l) = a :: take n l := rfl
@[simp] theorem take_length : ∀ (l : list α), take (length l) l = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := begin change a :: (take (length l) l) = a :: l, rw take_length end
theorem take_all_of_le : ∀ {n} {l : list α}, length l ≤ n → take n l = l
| 0 [] h := rfl
| 0 (a::l) h := absurd h (not_le_of_gt (zero_lt_succ _))
| (n+1) [] h := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) h :=
begin
change a :: take n l = a :: l,
rw [take_all_of_le (le_of_succ_le_succ h)]
end
@[simp] theorem take_left : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, take (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁
| [] l₂ := rfl
| (a::l₁) l₂ := congr_arg (cons a) (take_left l₁ l₂)
theorem take_left' {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n} (h : length l₁ = n) :
take n (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ :=
by rw ← h; apply take_left
theorem take_take : ∀ (n m) (l : list α), take n (take m l) = take (min n m) l
| n 0 l := by rw [min_zero, take_zero, take_nil]
| 0 m l := by rw [zero_min, take_zero, take_zero]
| (succ n) (succ m) nil := by simp only [take_nil]
| (succ n) (succ m) (a::l) := by simp only [take, min_succ_succ, take_take n m l]; split; refl
theorem take_repeat (a : α) : ∀ (n m : ℕ), take n (repeat a m) = repeat a (min n m)
| n 0 := by simp
| 0 m := by simp
| (succ n) (succ m) := by simp [min_succ_succ, take_repeat]
lemma map_take {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ), (L.take i).map f = (L.map f).take i
| [] i := by simp
| L 0 := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) := by { dsimp, rw [map_take], }
lemma take_append_of_le_length : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ},
n ≤ l₁.length → (l₁ ++ l₂).take n = l₁.take n
| l₁ l₂ 0 hn := by simp
| [] l₂ (n+1) hn := absurd hn dec_trivial
| (a::l₁) l₂ (n+1) hn :=
by rw [list.take, list.cons_append, list.take, take_append_of_le_length (le_of_succ_le_succ hn)]
/-- Taking the first `l₁.length + i` elements in `l₁ ++ l₂` is the same as appending the first
`i` elements of `l₂` to `l₁`. -/
lemma take_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} (i : ℕ) :
take (l₁.length + i) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ ++ (take i l₂) :=
begin
induction l₁, { simp },
have : length l₁_tl + 1 + i = (length l₁_tl + i).succ,
by { rw nat.succ_eq_add_one, exact succ_add _ _ },
simp only [cons_append, length, this, take_cons, l₁_ih, eq_self_iff_true, and_self]
end
/-- The `i`-th element of a list coincides with the `i`-th element of any of its prefixes of
length `> i`. Version designed to rewrite from the big list to the small list. -/
lemma nth_le_take (L : list α) {i j : ℕ} (hi : i < L.length) (hj : i < j) :
nth_le L i hi = nth_le (L.take j) i (by { rw length_take, exact lt_min hj hi }) :=
by { rw nth_le_of_eq (take_append_drop j L).symm hi, exact nth_le_append _ _ }
/-- The `i`-th element of a list coincides with the `i`-th element of any of its prefixes of
length `> i`. Version designed to rewrite from the small list to the big list. -/
lemma nth_le_take' (L : list α) {i j : ℕ} (hi : i < (L.take j).length) :
nth_le (L.take j) i hi = nth_le L i (lt_of_lt_of_le hi (by simp [le_refl])) :=
by { simp at hi, rw nth_le_take L _ hi.1 }
@[simp] theorem drop_nil : ∀ n, drop n [] = ([] : list α)
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := rfl
@[simp] theorem drop_one : ∀ l : list α, drop 1 l = tail l
| [] := rfl
| (a :: l) := rfl
theorem drop_add : ∀ m n (l : list α), drop (m + n) l = drop m (drop n l)
| m 0 l := rfl
| m (n+1) [] := (drop_nil _).symm
| m (n+1) (a::l) := drop_add m n _
@[simp] theorem drop_left : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, drop (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₂
| [] l₂ := rfl
| (a::l₁) l₂ := drop_left l₁ l₂
theorem drop_left' {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n} (h : length l₁ = n) :
drop n (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₂ :=
by rw ← h; apply drop_left
theorem drop_eq_nth_le_cons : ∀ {n} {l : list α} h,
drop n l = nth_le l n h :: drop (n+1) l
| 0 (a::l) h := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) h := @drop_eq_nth_le_cons n _ _
@[simp] lemma drop_length (l : list α) : l.drop l.length = [] :=
calc l.drop l.length = (l ++ []).drop l.length : by simp
... = [] : drop_left _ _
lemma drop_append_of_le_length : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ}, n ≤ l₁.length →
(l₁ ++ l₂).drop n = l₁.drop n ++ l₂
| l₁ l₂ 0 hn := by simp
| [] l₂ (n+1) hn := absurd hn dec_trivial
| (a::l₁) l₂ (n+1) hn :=
by rw [drop, cons_append, drop, drop_append_of_le_length (le_of_succ_le_succ hn)]
/-- Dropping the elements up to `l₁.length + i` in `l₁ + l₂` is the same as dropping the elements
up to `i` in `l₂`. -/
lemma drop_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} (i : ℕ) :
drop (l₁.length + i) (l₁ ++ l₂) = drop i l₂ :=
begin
induction l₁, { simp },
have : length l₁_tl + 1 + i = (length l₁_tl + i).succ,
by { rw nat.succ_eq_add_one, exact succ_add _ _ },
simp only [cons_append, length, this, drop, l₁_ih]
end
/-- The `i + j`-th element of a list coincides with the `j`-th element of the list obtained by
dropping the first `i` elements. Version designed to rewrite from the big list to the small list. -/
lemma nth_le_drop (L : list α) {i j : ℕ} (h : i + j < L.length) :
nth_le L (i + j) h = nth_le (L.drop i) j
begin
have A : i < L.length := lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.le.intro rfl) h,
rw (take_append_drop i L).symm at h,
simpa only [le_of_lt A, min_eq_left, add_lt_add_iff_left, length_take, length_append] using h
end :=
begin
have A : length (take i L) = i, by simp [le_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.le.intro rfl) h)],
rw [nth_le_of_eq (take_append_drop i L).symm h, nth_le_append_right];
simp [A]
end
/-- The `i + j`-th element of a list coincides with the `j`-th element of the list obtained by
dropping the first `i` elements. Version designed to rewrite from the small list to the big list. -/
lemma nth_le_drop' (L : list α) {i j : ℕ} (h : j < (L.drop i).length) :
nth_le (L.drop i) j h = nth_le L (i + j) (nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub_left ((length_drop i L) ▸ h)) :=
by rw nth_le_drop
@[simp] theorem drop_drop (n : ℕ) : ∀ (m) (l : list α), drop n (drop m l) = drop (n + m) l
| m [] := by simp
| 0 l := by simp
| (m+1) (a::l) :=
calc drop n (drop (m + 1) (a :: l)) = drop n (drop m l) : rfl
... = drop (n + m) l : drop_drop m l
... = drop (n + (m + 1)) (a :: l) : rfl
theorem drop_take : ∀ (m : ℕ) (n : ℕ) (l : list α),
drop m (take (m + n) l) = take n (drop m l)
| 0 n _ := by simp
| (m+1) n nil := by simp
| (m+1) n (_::l) :=
have h: m + 1 + n = (m+n) + 1, by ac_refl,
by simpa [take_cons, h] using drop_take m n l
lemma map_drop {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ), (L.drop i).map f = (L.map f).drop i
| [] i := by simp
| L 0 := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) := by { dsimp, rw [map_drop], }
theorem modify_nth_tail_eq_take_drop (f : list α → list α) (H : f [] = []) :
∀ n l, modify_nth_tail f n l = take n l ++ f (drop n l)
| 0 l := rfl
| (n+1) [] := H.symm
| (n+1) (b::l) := congr_arg (cons b) (modify_nth_tail_eq_take_drop n l)
theorem modify_nth_eq_take_drop (f : α → α) :
∀ n l, modify_nth f n l = take n l ++ modify_head f (drop n l) :=
modify_nth_tail_eq_take_drop _ rfl
theorem modify_nth_eq_take_cons_drop (f : α → α) {n l} (h) :
modify_nth f n l = take n l ++ f (nth_le l n h) :: drop (n+1) l :=
by rw [modify_nth_eq_take_drop, drop_eq_nth_le_cons h]; refl
theorem update_nth_eq_take_cons_drop (a : α) {n l} (h : n < length l) :
update_nth l n a = take n l ++ a :: drop (n+1) l :=
by rw [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, modify_nth_eq_take_cons_drop _ h]
@[simp] lemma update_nth_eq_nil (l : list α) (n : ℕ) (a : α) : l.update_nth n a = [] ↔ l = [] :=
by cases l; cases n; simp only [update_nth]
section take'
variable [inhabited α]
@[simp] theorem take'_length : ∀ n l, length (@take' α _ n l) = n
| 0 l := rfl
| (n+1) l := congr_arg succ (take'_length _ _)
@[simp] theorem take'_nil : ∀ n, take' n (@nil α) = repeat (default _) n
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := congr_arg (cons _) (take'_nil _)
theorem take'_eq_take : ∀ {n} {l : list α},
n ≤ length l → take' n l = take n l
| 0 l h := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) h := congr_arg (cons _) $
take'_eq_take $ le_of_succ_le_succ h
@[simp] theorem take'_left (l₁ l₂ : list α) : take' (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ :=
(take'_eq_take (by simp only [length_append, nat.le_add_right])).trans (take_left _ _)
theorem take'_left' {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n} (h : length l₁ = n) :
take' n (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ :=
by rw ← h; apply take'_left
end take'
/-! ### foldl, foldr -/
lemma foldl_ext (f g : α → β → α) (a : α)
{l : list β} (H : ∀ a : α, ∀ b ∈ l, f a b = g a b) :
foldl f a l = foldl g a l :=
begin
induction l with hd tl ih generalizing a, {refl},
unfold foldl,
rw [ih (λ a b bin, H a b $ mem_cons_of_mem _ bin), H a hd (mem_cons_self _ _)]
end
lemma foldr_ext (f g : α → β → β) (b : β)
{l : list α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ b : β, f a b = g a b) :
foldr f b l = foldr g b l :=
begin
induction l with hd tl ih, {refl},
simp only [mem_cons_iff, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, forall_eq] at H,
simp only [foldr, ih H.2, H.1]
end
@[simp] theorem foldl_nil (f : α → β → α) (a : α) : foldl f a [] = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldl_cons (f : α → β → α) (a : α) (b : β) (l : list β) :
foldl f a (b::l) = foldl f (f a b) l := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldr_nil (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : foldr f b [] = b := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldr_cons (f : α → β → β) (b : β) (a : α) (l : list α) :
foldr f b (a::l) = f a (foldr f b l) := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldl_append (f : α → β → α) :
∀ (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : list β), foldl f a (l₁++l₂) = foldl f (foldl f a l₁) l₂
| a [] l₂ := rfl
| a (b::l₁) l₂ := by simp only [cons_append, foldl_cons, foldl_append (f a b) l₁ l₂]
@[simp] theorem foldr_append (f : α → β → β) :
∀ (b : β) (l₁ l₂ : list α), foldr f b (l₁++l₂) = foldr f (foldr f b l₂) l₁
| b [] l₂ := rfl
| b (a::l₁) l₂ := by simp only [cons_append, foldr_cons, foldr_append b l₁ l₂]
@[simp] theorem foldl_join (f : α → β → α) :
∀ (a : α) (L : list (list β)), foldl f a (join L) = foldl (foldl f) a L
| a [] := rfl
| a (l::L) := by simp only [join, foldl_append, foldl_cons, foldl_join (foldl f a l) L]
@[simp] theorem foldr_join (f : α → β → β) :
∀ (b : β) (L : list (list α)), foldr f b (join L) = foldr (λ l b, foldr f b l) b L
| a [] := rfl
| a (l::L) := by simp only [join, foldr_append, foldr_join a L, foldr_cons]
theorem foldl_reverse (f : α → β → α) (a : α) (l : list β) : foldl f a (reverse l) = foldr (λx y, f y x) a l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_cons, foldl_append, foldl_cons, foldl_nil, foldr]]
theorem foldr_reverse (f : α → β → β) (a : β) (l : list α) : foldr f a (reverse l) = foldl (λx y, f y x) a l :=
let t := foldl_reverse (λx y, f y x) a (reverse l) in
by rw reverse_reverse l at t; rwa t
@[simp] theorem foldr_eta : ∀ (l : list α), foldr cons [] l = l
| [] := rfl
| (x::l) := by simp only [foldr_cons, foldr_eta l]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem reverse_foldl {l : list α} : reverse (foldl (λ t h, h :: t) [] l) = l :=
by rw ←foldr_reverse; simp
/- scanl -/
lemma length_scanl {β : Type*} {f : α → β → α} :
∀ a l, length (scanl f a l) = l.length + 1
| a [] := rfl
| a (x :: l) := by erw [length_cons, length_cons, length_scanl]
/- scanr -/
@[simp] theorem scanr_nil (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : scanr f b [] = [b] := rfl
@[simp] theorem scanr_aux_cons (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : ∀ (a : α) (l : list α),
scanr_aux f b (a::l) = (foldr f b (a::l), scanr f b l)
| a [] := rfl
| a (x::l) := let t := scanr_aux_cons x l in
by simp only [scanr, scanr_aux, t, foldr_cons]
@[simp] theorem scanr_cons (f : α → β → β) (b : β) (a : α) (l : list α) :
scanr f b (a::l) = foldr f b (a::l) :: scanr f b l :=
by simp only [scanr, scanr_aux_cons, foldr_cons]; split; refl
section foldl_eq_foldr
-- foldl and foldr coincide when f is commutative and associative
variables {f : α → α → α} (hcomm : commutative f) (hassoc : associative f)
include hassoc
theorem foldl1_eq_foldr1 : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (l++[b]) = foldr f b (a::l)
| a b nil := rfl
| a b (c :: l) := by simp only [cons_append, foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl1_eq_foldr1 _ _ l]; rw hassoc
include hcomm
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b::l) = f b (foldl f a l)
| a b nil := hcomm a b
| a b (c::l) := by simp only [foldl_cons];
rw [← foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc, right_comm _ hcomm hassoc]; refl
theorem foldl_eq_foldr : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr f a l
| a nil := rfl
| a (b :: l) :=
by simp only [foldr_cons, foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc hcomm hassoc]; rw (foldl_eq_foldr a l)
end foldl_eq_foldr
section foldl_eq_foldlr'
variables {f : α → β → α}
variables hf : ∀ a b c, f (f a b) c = f (f a c) b
include hf
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm' : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b::l) = f (foldl f a l) b
| a b [] := rfl
| a b (c :: l) := by rw [foldl,foldl,foldl,← foldl_eq_of_comm',foldl,hf]
theorem foldl_eq_foldr' : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr (flip f) a l
| a [] := rfl
| a (b :: l) := by rw [foldl_eq_of_comm' hf,foldr,foldl_eq_foldr']; refl
end foldl_eq_foldlr'
section foldl_eq_foldlr'
variables {f : α → β → β}
variables hf : ∀ a b c, f a (f b c) = f b (f a c)
include hf
theorem foldr_eq_of_comm' : ∀ a b l, foldr f a (b::l) = foldr f (f b a) l
| a b [] := rfl
| a b (c :: l) := by rw [foldr,foldr,foldr,hf,← foldr_eq_of_comm']; refl
end foldl_eq_foldlr'
section
variables {op : α → α → α} [ha : is_associative α op] [hc : is_commutative α op]
local notation a * b := op a b
local notation l <*> a := foldl op a l
include ha
lemma foldl_assoc : ∀ {l : list α} {a₁ a₂}, l <*> (a₁ * a₂) = a₁ * (l <*> a₂)
| [] a₁ a₂ := rfl
| (a :: l) a₁ a₂ :=
calc a::l <*> (a₁ * a₂) = l <*> (a₁ * (a₂ * a)) : by simp only [foldl_cons, ha.assoc]
... = a₁ * (a::l <*> a₂) : by rw [foldl_assoc, foldl_cons]
lemma foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc : ∀{l : list α} {a₁ a₂}, (l <*> a₁) * a₂ = a₁ * l.foldr (*) a₂
| [] a₁ a₂ := rfl
| (a :: l) a₁ a₂ := by simp only [foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl_assoc, ha.assoc]; rw [foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc]
include hc
lemma foldl_assoc_comm_cons {l : list α} {a₁ a₂} : (a₁ :: l) <*> a₂ = a₁ * (l <*> a₂) :=
by rw [foldl_cons, hc.comm, foldl_assoc]
end
/-! ### mfoldl, mfoldr -/
section mfoldl_mfoldr
variables {m : Type v → Type w} [monad m]
@[simp] theorem mfoldl_nil (f : β → α → m β) {b} : mfoldl f b [] = pure b := rfl
@[simp] theorem mfoldr_nil (f : α → β → m β) {b} : mfoldr f b [] = pure b := rfl
@[simp] theorem mfoldl_cons {f : β → α → m β} {b a l} :
mfoldl f b (a :: l) = f b a >>= λ b', mfoldl f b' l := rfl
@[simp] theorem mfoldr_cons {f : α → β → m β} {b a l} :
mfoldr f b (a :: l) = mfoldr f b l >>= f a := rfl
variables [is_lawful_monad m]
@[simp] theorem mfoldl_append {f : β → α → m β} : ∀ {b l₁ l₂},
mfoldl f b (l₁ ++ l₂) = mfoldl f b l₁ >>= λ x, mfoldl f x l₂
| _ [] _ := by simp only [nil_append, mfoldl_nil, pure_bind]
| _ (_::_) _ := by simp only [cons_append, mfoldl_cons, mfoldl_append, bind_assoc]
@[simp] theorem mfoldr_append {f : α → β → m β} : ∀ {b l₁ l₂},
mfoldr f b (l₁ ++ l₂) = mfoldr f b l₂ >>= λ x, mfoldr f x l₁
| _ [] _ := by simp only [nil_append, mfoldr_nil, bind_pure]
| _ (_::_) _ := by simp only [mfoldr_cons, cons_append, mfoldr_append, bind_assoc]
end mfoldl_mfoldr
/-! ### prod and sum -/
-- list.sum was already defined in defs.lean, but we couldn't tag it with `to_additive` yet.
attribute [to_additive] list.prod
section monoid
variables [monoid α] {l l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α}
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_nil : ([] : list α).prod = 1 := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_singleton : [a].prod = a := one_mul a
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_cons : (a::l).prod = a * l.prod :=
calc (a::l).prod = foldl (*) (a * 1) l : by simp only [list.prod, foldl_cons, one_mul, mul_one]
... = _ : foldl_assoc
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_append : (l₁ ++ l₂).prod = l₁.prod * l₂.prod :=
calc (l₁ ++ l₂).prod = foldl (*) (foldl (*) 1 l₁ * 1) l₂ : by simp [list.prod]
... = l₁.prod * l₂.prod : foldl_assoc
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_join {l : list (list α)} : l.join.prod = (l.map list.prod).prod :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, list.join, map, prod_append, prod_cons]]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_foldr : l.prod = foldr (*) 1 l :=
list.rec_on l rfl $ λ a l ihl, by rw [prod_cons, foldr_cons, ihl]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_hom_rel {α β γ : Type*} [monoid β] [monoid γ] (l : list α) {r : β → γ → Prop}
{f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (h₁ : r 1 1) (h₂ : ∀⦃a b c⦄, r b c → r (f a * b) (g a * c)) :
r (l.map f).prod (l.map g).prod :=
list.rec_on l h₁ (λ a l hl, by simp only [map_cons, prod_cons, h₂ hl])
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_hom [monoid β] (l : list α) (f : α → β) [is_monoid_hom f] :
(l.map f).prod = f l.prod :=
by { simp only [prod, foldl_map, (is_monoid_hom.map_one f).symm],
exact l.foldl_hom _ _ _ 1 (is_monoid_hom.map_mul f) }
-- `to_additive` chokes on the next few lemmas, so we do them by hand below
@[simp]
lemma prod_take_mul_prod_drop :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ), (L.take i).prod * (L.drop i).prod = L.prod
| [] i := by simp
| L 0 := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) := by { dsimp, rw [prod_cons, prod_cons, mul_assoc, prod_take_mul_prod_drop], }
@[simp]
lemma prod_take_succ :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ) (p), (L.take (i + 1)).prod = (L.take i).prod * L.nth_le i p
| [] i p := by cases p
| (h :: t) 0 _ := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) _ := by { dsimp, rw [prod_cons, prod_cons, prod_take_succ, mul_assoc], }
/-- A list with product not one must have positive length. -/
lemma length_pos_of_prod_ne_one (L : list α) (h : L.prod ≠ 1) : 0 < L.length :=
by { cases L, { simp at h, cases h, }, { simp, }, }
end monoid
@[simp]
lemma sum_take_add_sum_drop [add_monoid α] :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ), (L.take i).sum + (L.drop i).sum = L.sum
| [] i := by simp
| L 0 := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) := by { dsimp, rw [sum_cons, sum_cons, add_assoc, sum_take_add_sum_drop], }
@[simp]
lemma sum_take_succ [add_monoid α] :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ) (p), (L.take (i + 1)).sum = (L.take i).sum + L.nth_le i p
| [] i p := by cases p
| (h :: t) 0 _ := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) _ := by { dsimp, rw [sum_cons, sum_cons, sum_take_succ, add_assoc], }
lemma eq_of_sum_take_eq [add_left_cancel_monoid α] {L L' : list α} (h : L.length = L'.length)
(h' : ∀ i ≤ L.length, (L.take i).sum = (L'.take i).sum) : L = L' :=
begin
apply ext_le h (λ i h₁ h₂, _),
have : (L.take (i + 1)).sum = (L'.take (i + 1)).sum := h' _ (nat.succ_le_of_lt h₁),
rw [sum_take_succ L i h₁, sum_take_succ L' i h₂, h' i (le_of_lt h₁)] at this,
exact add_left_cancel this
end
lemma monotone_sum_take [canonically_ordered_add_monoid α] (L : list α) :
monotone (λ i, (L.take i).sum) :=
begin
apply monotone_of_monotone_nat (λ n, _),
by_cases h : n < L.length,
{ rw sum_take_succ _ _ h,
exact le_add_right (le_refl _) },
{ push_neg at h,
simp [take_all_of_le h, take_all_of_le (le_trans h (nat.le_succ _))] }
end
/-- A list with sum not zero must have positive length. -/
lemma length_pos_of_sum_ne_zero [add_monoid α] (L : list α) (h : L.sum ≠ 0) : 0 < L.length :=
by { cases L, { simp at h, cases h, }, { simp, }, }
/-- If all elements in a list are bounded below by `1`, then the length of the list is bounded
by the sum of the elements. -/
lemma length_le_sum_of_one_le (L : list ℕ) (h : ∀ i ∈ L, 1 ≤ i) : L.length ≤ L.sum :=
begin
induction L with j L IH h, { simp },
rw [sum_cons, length, add_comm],
exact add_le_add (h _ (set.mem_insert _ _)) (IH (λ i hi, h i (set.mem_union_right _ hi)))
end
-- Now we tie those lemmas back to their multiplicative versions.
attribute [to_additive] prod_take_mul_prod_drop prod_take_succ length_pos_of_prod_ne_one
/-- A list with positive sum must have positive length. -/
-- This is an easy consequence of `length_pos_of_sum_ne_zero`, but often useful in applications.
lemma length_pos_of_sum_pos [ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid α] (L : list α) (h : 0 < L.sum) :
0 < L.length :=
length_pos_of_sum_ne_zero L (ne_of_gt h)
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_erase [decidable_eq α] [comm_monoid α] {a} :
Π {l : list α}, a ∈ l → a * (l.erase a).prod = l.prod
| (b::l) h :=
begin
rcases eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem h with rfl | ⟨ne, h⟩,
{ simp only [list.erase, if_pos, prod_cons] },
{ simp only [list.erase, if_neg (mt eq.symm ne), prod_cons, prod_erase h, mul_left_comm a b] }
end
lemma dvd_prod [comm_semiring α] {a} {l : list α} (ha : a ∈ l) : a ∣ l.prod :=
let ⟨s, t, h⟩ := mem_split ha in
by rw [h, prod_append, prod_cons, mul_left_comm]; exact dvd_mul_right _ _
@[simp] theorem sum_const_nat (m n : ℕ) : sum (list.repeat m n) = m * n :=
by induction n; [refl, simp only [*, repeat_succ, sum_cons, nat.mul_succ, add_comm]]
theorem dvd_sum [comm_semiring α] {a} {l : list α} (h : ∀ x ∈ l, a ∣ x) : a ∣ l.sum :=
begin
induction l with x l ih,
{ exact dvd_zero _ },
{ rw [list.sum_cons],
exact dvd_add (h _ (mem_cons_self _ _)) (ih (λ x hx, h x (mem_cons_of_mem _ hx))) }
end
@[simp] theorem length_join (L : list (list α)) : length (join L) = sum (map length L) :=
by induction L; [refl, simp only [*, join, map, sum_cons, length_append]]
@[simp] theorem length_bind (l : list α) (f : α → list β) : length (list.bind l f) = sum (map (length ∘ f) l) :=
by rw [list.bind, length_join, map_map]
lemma exists_lt_of_sum_lt [decidable_linear_ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid β] {l : list α}
(f g : α → β) (h : (l.map f).sum < (l.map g).sum) : ∃ x ∈ l, f x < g x :=
begin
induction l with x l,
{ exfalso, exact lt_irrefl _ h },
{ by_cases h' : f x < g x, exact ⟨x, mem_cons_self _ _, h'⟩,
rcases l_ih _ with ⟨y, h1y, h2y⟩, refine ⟨y, mem_cons_of_mem x h1y, h2y⟩, simp at h,
exact lt_of_add_lt_add_left' (lt_of_lt_of_le h $ add_le_add_right (le_of_not_gt h') _) }
end
lemma exists_le_of_sum_le [decidable_linear_ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid β] {l : list α}
(hl : l ≠ []) (f g : α → β) (h : (l.map f).sum ≤ (l.map g).sum) : ∃ x ∈ l, f x ≤ g x :=
begin
cases l with x l,
{ contradiction },
{ by_cases h' : f x ≤ g x, exact ⟨x, mem_cons_self _ _, h'⟩,
rcases exists_lt_of_sum_lt f g _ with ⟨y, h1y, h2y⟩,
exact ⟨y, mem_cons_of_mem x h1y, le_of_lt h2y⟩, simp at h,
exact lt_of_add_lt_add_left' (lt_of_le_of_lt h $ add_lt_add_right (lt_of_not_ge h') _) }
end
-- Several lemmas about sum/head/tail for `list ℕ`.
-- These are hard to generalize well, as they rely on the fact that `default ℕ = 0`.
-- We'd like to state this as `L.head * L.tail.prod = L.prod`,
-- but because `L.head` relies on an inhabited instances and
-- returns a garbage value for the empty list, this is not possible.
-- Instead we write the statement in terms of `(L.nth 0).get_or_else 1`,
-- and below, restate the lemma just for `ℕ`.
@[to_additive]
lemma head_mul_tail_prod' [monoid α] (L : list α) : (L.nth 0).get_or_else 1 * L.tail.prod = L.prod :=
by { cases L, { simp, refl, }, { simp, }, }
lemma head_add_tail_sum (L : list ℕ) : L.head + L.tail.sum = L.sum :=
by { cases L, { simp, refl, }, { simp, }, }
lemma head_le_sum (L : list ℕ) : L.head ≤ L.sum :=
nat.le.intro (head_add_tail_sum L)
lemma tail_sum (L : list ℕ) : L.tail.sum = L.sum - L.head :=
by rw [← head_add_tail_sum L, add_comm, nat.add_sub_cancel]
/-! ### join -/
attribute [simp] join
theorem join_eq_nil : ∀ {L : list (list α)}, join L = [] ↔ ∀ l ∈ L, l = []
| [] := iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _)
| (l::L) := by simp only [join, append_eq_nil, join_eq_nil, forall_mem_cons]
@[simp] theorem join_append (L₁ L₂ : list (list α)) : join (L₁ ++ L₂) = join L₁ ++ join L₂ :=
by induction L₁; [refl, simp only [*, join, cons_append, append_assoc]]
lemma join_join (l : list (list (list α))) : l.join.join = (l.map join).join :=
by { induction l, simp, simp [l_ih] }
/-- In a join, taking the first elements up to an index which is the sum of the lengths of the
first `i` sublists, is the same as taking the join of the first `i` sublists. -/
lemma take_sum_join (L : list (list α)) (i : ℕ) :
L.join.take ((L.map length).take i).sum = (L.take i).join :=
begin
induction L generalizing i, { simp },
cases i, { simp },
simp [take_append, L_ih]
end
/-- In a join, dropping all the elements up to an index which is the sum of the lengths of the
first `i` sublists, is the same as taking the join after dropping the first `i` sublists. -/
lemma drop_sum_join (L : list (list α)) (i : ℕ) :
L.join.drop ((L.map length).take i).sum = (L.drop i).join :=
begin
induction L generalizing i, { simp },
cases i, { simp },
simp [drop_append, L_ih],
end
/-- Taking only the first `i+1` elements in a list, and then dropping the first `i` ones, one is
left with a list of length `1` made of the `i`-th element of the original list. -/
lemma drop_take_succ_eq_cons_nth_le (L : list α) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < L.length) :
(L.take (i+1)).drop i = [nth_le L i hi] :=
begin
induction L generalizing i,
{ simp only [length] at hi, exact (nat.not_succ_le_zero i hi).elim },
cases i, { simp },
have : i < L_tl.length,
{ simp at hi,
exact nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ hi },
simp [L_ih this],
refl
end
/-- In a join of sublists, taking the slice between the indices `A` and `B - 1` gives back the
original sublist of index `i` if `A` is the sum of the lenghts of sublists of index `< i`, and
`B` is the sum of the lengths of sublists of index `≤ i`. -/
lemma drop_take_succ_join_eq_nth_le (L : list (list α)) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < L.length) :
(L.join.take ((L.map length).take (i+1)).sum).drop ((L.map length).take i).sum = nth_le L i hi :=
begin
have : (L.map length).take i = ((L.take (i+1)).map length).take i, by simp [map_take, take_take],
simp [take_sum_join, this, drop_sum_join, drop_take_succ_eq_cons_nth_le _ hi]
end
/-- Auxiliary lemma to control elements in a join. -/
lemma sum_take_map_length_lt1 (L : list (list α)) {i j : ℕ}
(hi : i < L.length) (hj : j < (nth_le L i hi).length) :
((L.map length).take i).sum + j < ((L.map length).take (i+1)).sum :=
by simp [hi, sum_take_succ, hj]
/-- Auxiliary lemma to control elements in a join. -/
lemma sum_take_map_length_lt2 (L : list (list α)) {i j : ℕ}
(hi : i < L.length) (hj : j < (nth_le L i hi).length) :
((L.map length).take i).sum + j < L.join.length :=
begin
convert lt_of_lt_of_le (sum_take_map_length_lt1 L hi hj) (monotone_sum_take _ hi),
have : L.length = (L.map length).length, by simp,
simp [this, -length_map]
end
/-- The `n`-th element in a join of sublists is the `j`-th element of the `i`th sublist,
where `n` can be obtained in terms of `i` and `j` by adding the lengths of all the sublists
of index `< i`, and adding `j`. -/
lemma nth_le_join (L : list (list α)) {i j : ℕ}
(hi : i < L.length) (hj : j < (nth_le L i hi).length) :
nth_le L.join (((L.map length).take i).sum + j) (sum_take_map_length_lt2 L hi hj) =
nth_le (nth_le L i hi) j hj :=
by rw [nth_le_take L.join (sum_take_map_length_lt2 L hi hj) (sum_take_map_length_lt1 L hi hj),
nth_le_drop, nth_le_of_eq (drop_take_succ_join_eq_nth_le L hi)]
/-- Two lists of sublists are equal iff their joins coincide, as well as the lengths of the
sublists. -/
theorem eq_iff_join_eq (L L' : list (list α)) :
L = L' ↔ L.join = L'.join ∧ map length L = map length L' :=
begin
refine ⟨λ H, by simp [H], _⟩,
rintros ⟨join_eq, length_eq⟩,
apply ext_le,
{ have : length (map length L) = length (map length L'), by rw length_eq,
simpa using this },
{ assume n h₁ h₂,
rw [← drop_take_succ_join_eq_nth_le, ← drop_take_succ_join_eq_nth_le, join_eq, length_eq] }
end
/-! ### lexicographic ordering -/
/-- Given a strict order `<` on `α`, the lexicographic strict order on `list α`, for which
`[a0, ..., an] < [b0, ..., b_k]` if `a0 < b0` or `a0 = b0` and `[a1, ..., an] < [b1, ..., bk]`.
The definition is given for any relation `r`, not only strict orders. -/
inductive lex (r : α → α → Prop) : list α → list α → Prop
| nil {a l} : lex [] (a :: l)
| cons {a l₁ l₂} (h : lex l₁ l₂) : lex (a :: l₁) (a :: l₂)
| rel {a₁ l₁ a₂ l₂} (h : r a₁ a₂) : lex (a₁ :: l₁) (a₂ :: l₂)
namespace lex
theorem cons_iff {r : α → α → Prop} [is_irrefl α r] {a l₁ l₂} :
lex r (a :: l₁) (a :: l₂) ↔ lex r l₁ l₂ :=
⟨λ h, by cases h with _ _ _ _ _ h _ _ _ _ h;
[exact h, exact (irrefl_of r a h).elim], lex.cons⟩
@[simp] theorem not_nil_right (r : α → α → Prop) (l : list α) : ¬ lex r l [].
instance is_order_connected (r : α → α → Prop)
[is_order_connected α r] [is_trichotomous α r] :
is_order_connected (list α) (lex r) :=
⟨λ l₁, match l₁ with
| _, [], c::l₃, nil := or.inr nil
| _, [], c::l₃, rel _ := or.inr nil
| _, [], c::l₃, cons _ := or.inr nil
| _, b::l₂, c::l₃, nil := or.inl nil
| a::l₁, b::l₂, c::l₃, rel h :=
(is_order_connected.conn _ b _ h).imp rel rel
| a::l₁, b::l₂, _::l₃, cons h := begin
rcases trichotomous_of r a b with ab | rfl | ab,
{ exact or.inl (rel ab) },
{ exact (_match _ l₂ _ h).imp cons cons },
{ exact or.inr (rel ab) }
end
end⟩
instance is_trichotomous (r : α → α → Prop) [is_trichotomous α r] :
is_trichotomous (list α) (lex r) :=
⟨λ l₁, match l₁ with
| [], [] := or.inr (or.inl rfl)
| [], b::l₂ := or.inl nil
| a::l₁, [] := or.inr (or.inr nil)
| a::l₁, b::l₂ := begin
rcases trichotomous_of r a b with ab | rfl | ab,
{ exact or.inl (rel ab) },
{ exact (_match l₁ l₂).imp cons
(or.imp (congr_arg _) cons) },
{ exact or.inr (or.inr (rel ab)) }
end
end⟩
instance is_asymm (r : α → α → Prop)
[is_asymm α r] : is_asymm (list α) (lex r) :=
⟨λ l₁, match l₁ with
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.rel h₁, lex.rel h₂ := asymm h₁ h₂
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.rel h₁, lex.cons h₂ := asymm h₁ h₁
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.cons h₁, lex.rel h₂ := asymm h₂ h₂
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.cons h₁, lex.cons h₂ :=
by exact _match _ _ h₁ h₂
end⟩
instance is_strict_total_order (r : α → α → Prop)
[is_strict_total_order' α r] : is_strict_total_order' (list α) (lex r) :=
{..is_strict_weak_order_of_is_order_connected}
instance decidable_rel [decidable_eq α] (r : α → α → Prop)
[decidable_rel r] : decidable_rel (lex r)
| l₁ [] := is_false $ λ h, by cases h
| [] (b::l₂) := is_true lex.nil
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) := begin
haveI := decidable_rel l₁ l₂,
refine decidable_of_iff (r a b ∨ a = b ∧ lex r l₁ l₂) ⟨λ h, _, λ h, _⟩,
{ rcases h with h | ⟨rfl, h⟩,
{ exact lex.rel h },
{ exact lex.cons h } },
{ rcases h with _|⟨_,_,_,h⟩|⟨_,_,_,_,h⟩,
{ exact or.inr ⟨rfl, h⟩ },
{ exact or.inl h } }
end
theorem append_right (r : α → α → Prop) :
∀ {s₁ s₂} t, lex r s₁ s₂ → lex r s₁ (s₂ ++ t)
| _ _ t nil := nil
| _ _ t (cons h) := cons (append_right _ h)
| _ _ t (rel r) := rel r
theorem append_left (R : α → α → Prop) {t₁ t₂} (h : lex R t₁ t₂) :
∀ s, lex R (s ++ t₁) (s ++ t₂)
| [] := h
| (a::l) := cons (append_left l)
theorem imp {r s : α → α → Prop} (H : ∀ a b, r a b → s a b) :
∀ l₁ l₂, lex r l₁ l₂ → lex s l₁ l₂
| _ _ nil := nil
| _ _ (cons h) := cons (imp _ _ h)
| _ _ (rel r) := rel (H _ _ r)
theorem to_ne : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, lex (≠) l₁ l₂ → l₁ ≠ l₂
| _ _ (cons h) e := to_ne h (list.cons.inj e).2
| _ _ (rel r) e := r (list.cons.inj e).1
theorem ne_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} (H : length l₁ ≤ length l₂) :
lex (≠) l₁ l₂ ↔ l₁ ≠ l₂ :=
⟨to_ne, λ h, begin
induction l₁ with a l₁ IH generalizing l₂; cases l₂ with b l₂,
{ contradiction },
{ apply nil },
{ exact (not_lt_of_ge H).elim (succ_pos _) },
{ cases classical.em (a = b) with ab ab,
{ subst b, apply cons,
exact IH (le_of_succ_le_succ H) (mt (congr_arg _) h) },
{ exact rel ab } }
end⟩
end lex
--Note: this overrides an instance in core lean
instance has_lt' [has_lt α] : has_lt (list α) := ⟨lex (<)⟩
theorem nil_lt_cons [has_lt α] (a : α) (l : list α) : [] < a :: l :=
lex.nil
instance [linear_order α] : linear_order (list α) :=
linear_order_of_STO' (lex (<))
--Note: this overrides an instance in core lean
instance has_le' [linear_order α] : has_le (list α) :=
preorder.to_has_le _
instance [decidable_linear_order α] : decidable_linear_order (list α) :=
decidable_linear_order_of_STO' (lex (<))
/-! ### all & any -/
@[simp] theorem all_nil (p : α → bool) : all [] p = tt := rfl
@[simp] theorem all_cons (p : α → bool) (a : α) (l : list α) : all (a::l) p = (p a && all l p) := rfl
theorem all_iff_forall {p : α → bool} {l : list α} : all l p ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
begin
induction l with a l ih,
{ exact iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _) },
simp only [all_cons, band_coe_iff, ih, forall_mem_cons]
end
theorem all_iff_forall_prop {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{l : list α} : all l (λ a, p a) ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
by simp only [all_iff_forall, bool.of_to_bool_iff]
@[simp] theorem any_nil (p : α → bool) : any [] p = ff := rfl
@[simp] theorem any_cons (p : α → bool) (a : α) (l : list α) : any (a::l) p = (p a || any l p) := rfl
theorem any_iff_exists {p : α → bool} {l : list α} : any l p ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, p a :=
begin
induction l with a l ih,
{ exact iff_of_false bool.not_ff (not_exists_mem_nil _) },
simp only [any_cons, bor_coe_iff, ih, exists_mem_cons_iff]
end
theorem any_iff_exists_prop {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{l : list α} : any l (λ a, p a) ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, p a :=
by simp [any_iff_exists]
theorem any_of_mem {p : α → bool} {a : α} {l : list α} (h₁ : a ∈ l) (h₂ : p a) : any l p :=
any_iff_exists.2 ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩
@[priority 500] instance decidable_forall_mem {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
decidable (∀ x ∈ l, p x) :=
decidable_of_iff _ all_iff_forall_prop
instance decidable_exists_mem {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
decidable (∃ x ∈ l, p x) :=
decidable_of_iff _ any_iff_exists_prop
/-! ### map for partial functions -/
/-- Partial map. If `f : Π a, p a → β` is a partial function defined on
`a : α` satisfying `p`, then `pmap f l h` is essentially the same as `map f l`
but is defined only when all members of `l` satisfy `p`, using the proof
to apply `f`. -/
@[simp] def pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β) : Π l : list α, (∀ a ∈ l, p a) → list β
| [] H := []
| (a::l) H := f a (forall_mem_cons.1 H).1 :: pmap l (forall_mem_cons.1 H).2
/-- "Attach" the proof that the elements of `l` are in `l` to produce a new list
with the same elements but in the type `{x // x ∈ l}`. -/
def attach (l : list α) : list {x // x ∈ l} := pmap subtype.mk l (λ a, id)
theorem pmap_eq_map (p : α → Prop) (f : α → β) (l : list α) (H) :
@pmap _ _ p (λ a _, f a) l H = map f l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, pmap, map]]; split; refl
theorem pmap_congr {p q : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β} {g : Π a, q a → β}
(l : list α) {H₁ H₂} (h : ∀ a h₁ h₂, f a h₁ = g a h₂) :
pmap f l H₁ = pmap g l H₂ :=
by induction l with _ _ ih; [refl, rw [pmap, pmap, h, ih]]
theorem map_pmap {p : α → Prop} (g : β → γ) (f : Π a, p a → β)
(l H) : map g (pmap f l H) = pmap (λ a h, g (f a h)) l H :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, pmap, map]]; split; refl
theorem pmap_eq_map_attach {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β)
(l H) : pmap f l H = l.attach.map (λ x, f x.1 (H _ x.2)) :=
by rw [attach, map_pmap]; exact pmap_congr l (λ a h₁ h₂, rfl)
theorem attach_map_val (l : list α) : l.attach.map subtype.val = l :=
by rw [attach, map_pmap]; exact (pmap_eq_map _ _ _ _).trans (map_id l)
@[simp] theorem mem_attach (l : list α) : ∀ x, x ∈ l.attach | ⟨a, h⟩ :=
by have := mem_map.1 (by rw [attach_map_val]; exact h);
{ rcases this with ⟨⟨_, _⟩, m, rfl⟩, exact m }
@[simp] theorem mem_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β}
{l H b} : b ∈ pmap f l H ↔ ∃ a (h : a ∈ l), f a (H a h) = b :=
by simp only [pmap_eq_map_attach, mem_map, mem_attach, true_and, subtype.exists]
@[simp] theorem length_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β}
{l H} : length (pmap f l H) = length l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, pmap, length]]
@[simp] lemma length_attach (L : list α) : L.attach.length = L.length := length_pmap
/-! ### find -/
section find
variables {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] {l : list α} {a : α}
@[simp] theorem find_nil (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : find p [] = none :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem find_cons_of_pos (l) (h : p a) : find p (a::l) = some a :=
if_pos h
@[simp] theorem find_cons_of_neg (l) (h : ¬ p a) : find p (a::l) = find p l :=
if_neg h
@[simp] theorem find_eq_none : find p l = none ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, ¬ p x :=
begin
induction l with a l IH,
{ exact iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _) },
rw forall_mem_cons, by_cases h : p a,
{ simp only [find_cons_of_pos _ h, h, not_true, false_and] },
{ rwa [find_cons_of_neg _ h, iff_true_intro h, true_and] }
end
theorem find_some (H : find p l = some a) : p a :=
begin
induction l with b l IH, {contradiction},
by_cases h : p b,
{ rw find_cons_of_pos _ h at H, cases H, exact h },
{ rw find_cons_of_neg _ h at H, exact IH H }
end
@[simp] theorem find_mem (H : find p l = some a) : a ∈ l :=
begin
induction l with b l IH, {contradiction},
by_cases h : p b,
{ rw find_cons_of_pos _ h at H, cases H, apply mem_cons_self },
{ rw find_cons_of_neg _ h at H, exact mem_cons_of_mem _ (IH H) }
end
end find
/-! ### lookmap -/
section lookmap
variables (f : α → option α)
@[simp] theorem lookmap_nil : [].lookmap f = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem lookmap_cons_none {a : α} (l : list α) (h : f a = none) :
(a :: l).lookmap f = a :: l.lookmap f :=
by simp [lookmap, h]
@[simp] theorem lookmap_cons_some {a b : α} (l : list α) (h : f a = some b) :
(a :: l).lookmap f = b :: l :=
by simp [lookmap, h]
theorem lookmap_some : ∀ l : list α, l.lookmap some = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := rfl
theorem lookmap_none : ∀ l : list α, l.lookmap (λ _, none) = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := congr_arg (cons a) (lookmap_none l)
theorem lookmap_congr {f g : α → option α} :
∀ {l : list α}, (∀ a ∈ l, f a = g a) → l.lookmap f = l.lookmap g
| [] H := rfl
| (a::l) H := begin
cases forall_mem_cons.1 H with H₁ H₂,
cases h : g a with b,
{ simp [h, H₁.trans h, lookmap_congr H₂] },
{ simp [lookmap_cons_some _ _ h, lookmap_cons_some _ _ (H₁.trans h)] }
end
theorem lookmap_of_forall_not {l : list α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, f a = none) : l.lookmap f = l :=
(lookmap_congr H).trans (lookmap_none l)
theorem lookmap_map_eq (g : α → β) (h : ∀ a (b ∈ f a), g a = g b) :
∀ l : list α, map g (l.lookmap f) = map g l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := begin
cases h' : f a with b,
{ simp [h', lookmap_map_eq] },
{ simp [lookmap_cons_some _ _ h', h _ _ h'] }
end
theorem lookmap_id' (h : ∀ a (b ∈ f a), a = b) (l : list α) : l.lookmap f = l :=
by rw [← map_id (l.lookmap f), lookmap_map_eq, map_id]; exact h
theorem length_lookmap (l : list α) : length (l.lookmap f) = length l :=
by rw [← length_map, lookmap_map_eq _ (λ _, ()), length_map]; simp
end lookmap
/-! ### filter_map -/
@[simp] theorem filter_map_nil (f : α → option β) : filter_map f [] = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem filter_map_cons_none {f : α → option β} (a : α) (l : list α) (h : f a = none) :
filter_map f (a :: l) = filter_map f l :=
by simp only [filter_map, h]
@[simp] theorem filter_map_cons_some (f : α → option β)
(a : α) (l : list α) {b : β} (h : f a = some b) :
filter_map f (a :: l) = b :: filter_map f l :=
by simp only [filter_map, h]; split; refl
theorem filter_map_eq_map (f : α → β) : filter_map (some ∘ f) = map f :=
begin
funext l,
induction l with a l IH, {refl},
simp only [filter_map_cons_some (some ∘ f) _ _ rfl, IH, map_cons], split; refl
end
theorem filter_map_eq_filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] :
filter_map (option.guard p) = filter p :=
begin
funext l,
induction l with a l IH, {refl},
by_cases pa : p a,
{ simp only [filter_map, option.guard, IH, if_pos pa, filter_cons_of_pos _ pa], split; refl },
{ simp only [filter_map, option.guard, IH, if_neg pa, filter_cons_of_neg _ pa] }
end
theorem filter_map_filter_map (f : α → option β) (g : β → option γ) (l : list α) :
filter_map g (filter_map f l) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).bind g) l :=
begin
induction l with a l IH, {refl},
cases h : f a with b,
{ rw [filter_map_cons_none _ _ h, filter_map_cons_none, IH],
simp only [h, option.none_bind'] },
rw filter_map_cons_some _ _ _ h,
cases h' : g b with c;
[ rw [filter_map_cons_none _ _ h', filter_map_cons_none, IH],
rw [filter_map_cons_some _ _ _ h', filter_map_cons_some, IH] ];
simp only [h, h', option.some_bind']
end
theorem map_filter_map (f : α → option β) (g : β → γ) (l : list α) :
map g (filter_map f l) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).map g) l :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_map, filter_map_filter_map]; refl
theorem filter_map_map (f : α → β) (g : β → option γ) (l : list α) :
filter_map g (map f l) = filter_map (g ∘ f) l :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_map, filter_map_filter_map]; refl
theorem filter_filter_map (f : α → option β) (p : β → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
filter p (filter_map f l) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).filter p) l :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_filter, filter_map_filter_map]; refl
theorem filter_map_filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (f : α → option β) (l : list α) :
filter_map f (filter p l) = filter_map (λ x, if p x then f x else none) l :=
begin
rw [← filter_map_eq_filter, filter_map_filter_map], congr,
funext x,
show (option.guard p x).bind f = ite (p x) (f x) none,
by_cases h : p x,
{ simp only [option.guard, if_pos h, option.some_bind'] },
{ simp only [option.guard, if_neg h, option.none_bind'] }
end
@[simp] theorem filter_map_some (l : list α) : filter_map some l = l :=
by rw filter_map_eq_map; apply map_id
@[simp] theorem mem_filter_map (f : α → option β) (l : list α) {b : β} :
b ∈ filter_map f l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ f a = some b :=
begin
induction l with a l IH,
{ split, { intro H, cases H }, { rintro ⟨_, H, _⟩, cases H } },
cases h : f a with b',
{ have : f a ≠ some b, {rw h, intro, contradiction},
simp only [filter_map_cons_none _ _ h, IH, mem_cons_iff,
or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib, exists_eq_left, this, false_or] },
{ have : f a = some b ↔ b = b',
{ split; intro t, {rw t at h; injection h}, {exact t.symm ▸ h} },
simp only [filter_map_cons_some _ _ _ h, IH, mem_cons_iff,
or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib, this, exists_eq_left] }
end
theorem map_filter_map_of_inv (f : α → option β) (g : β → α)
(H : ∀ x : α, (f x).map g = some x) (l : list α) :
map g (filter_map f l) = l :=
by simp only [map_filter_map, H, filter_map_some]
theorem sublist.filter_map (f : α → option β) {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(s : l₁ <+ l₂) : filter_map f l₁ <+ filter_map f l₂ :=
by induction s with l₁ l₂ a s IH l₁ l₂ a s IH;
simp only [filter_map]; cases f a with b;
simp only [filter_map, IH, sublist.cons, sublist.cons2]
theorem sublist.map (f : α → β) {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(s : l₁ <+ l₂) : map f l₁ <+ map f l₂ :=
filter_map_eq_map f ▸ s.filter_map _
/-! ### filter -/
section filter
variables {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
lemma filter_congr {p q : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] [decidable_pred q]
: ∀ {l : list α}, (∀ x ∈ l, p x ↔ q x) → filter p l = filter q l
| [] _ := rfl
| (a::l) h := by rw forall_mem_cons at h; by_cases pa : p a;
[simp only [filter_cons_of_pos _ pa, filter_cons_of_pos _ (h.1.1 pa), filter_congr h.2],
simp only [filter_cons_of_neg _ pa, filter_cons_of_neg _ (mt h.1.2 pa), filter_congr h.2]]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem filter_subset (l : list α) : filter p l ⊆ l :=
(filter_sublist l).subset
theorem of_mem_filter {a : α} : ∀ {l}, a ∈ filter p l → p a
| (b::l) ain :=
if pb : p b then
have a ∈ b :: filter p l, by simpa only [filter_cons_of_pos _ pb] using ain,
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
(assume : a = b, begin rw [← this] at pb, exact pb end)
(assume : a ∈ filter p l, of_mem_filter this)
else
begin simp only [filter_cons_of_neg _ pb] at ain, exact (of_mem_filter ain) end
theorem mem_of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : a ∈ l :=
filter_subset l h
theorem mem_filter_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l}, a ∈ l → p a → a ∈ filter p l
| (_::l) (or.inl rfl) pa := by rw filter_cons_of_pos _ pa; apply mem_cons_self
| (b::l) (or.inr ain) pa := if pb : p b
then by rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ pb]; apply mem_cons_of_mem; apply mem_filter_of_mem ain pa
else by rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ pb]; apply mem_filter_of_mem ain pa
@[simp] theorem mem_filter {a : α} {l} : a ∈ filter p l ↔ a ∈ l ∧ p a :=
⟨λ h, ⟨mem_of_mem_filter h, of_mem_filter h⟩, λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, mem_filter_of_mem h₁ h₂⟩
theorem filter_eq_self {l} : filter p l = l ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
begin
induction l with a l ih,
{ exact iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _) },
rw forall_mem_cons, by_cases p a,
{ rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ h, cons_inj', ih, and_iff_right h] },
{ rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ h],
refine iff_of_false _ (mt and.left h), intro e,
have := filter_sublist l, rw e at this,
exact not_lt_of_ge (length_le_of_sublist this) (lt_succ_self _) }
end
theorem filter_eq_nil {l} : filter p l = [] ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, ¬p a :=
by simp only [eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_filter, not_and]
theorem filter_sublist_filter {l₁ l₂} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : filter p l₁ <+ filter p l₂ :=
filter_map_eq_filter p ▸ s.filter_map _
theorem filter_of_map (f : β → α) (l) : filter p (map f l) = map f (filter (p ∘ f) l) :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_map, filter_filter_map, filter_map_filter]; refl
@[simp] theorem filter_filter {q} [decidable_pred q] : ∀ l,
filter p (filter q l) = filter (λ a, p a ∧ q a) l
| [] := rfl
| (a :: l) := by by_cases hp : p a; by_cases hq : q a; simp only [hp, hq, filter, if_true, if_false,
true_and, false_and, filter_filter l, eq_self_iff_true]
@[simp] lemma filter_true {h : decidable_pred (λ a : α, true)} (l : list α) : @filter α (λ _, true) h l = l :=
by convert filter_eq_self.2 (λ _ _, trivial)
@[simp] lemma filter_false {h : decidable_pred (λ a : α, false)} (l : list α) : @filter α (λ _, false) h l = [] :=
by convert filter_eq_nil.2 (λ _ _, id)
@[simp] theorem span_eq_take_drop (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] :
∀ (l : list α), span p l = (take_while p l, drop_while p l)
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) :=
if pa : p a then by simp only [span, if_pos pa, span_eq_take_drop l, take_while, drop_while]
else by simp only [span, take_while, drop_while, if_neg pa]
@[simp] theorem take_while_append_drop (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] :
∀ (l : list α), take_while p l ++ drop_while p l = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := if pa : p a then by rw [take_while, drop_while, if_pos pa, if_pos pa, cons_append,
take_while_append_drop l]
else by rw [take_while, drop_while, if_neg pa, if_neg pa, nil_append]
@[simp] theorem countp_nil (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : countp p [] = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem countp_cons_of_pos {a : α} (l) (pa : p a) : countp p (a::l) = countp p l + 1 :=
if_pos pa
@[simp] theorem countp_cons_of_neg {a : α} (l) (pa : ¬ p a) : countp p (a::l) = countp p l :=
if_neg pa
theorem countp_eq_length_filter (l) : countp p l = length (filter p l) :=
by induction l with x l ih; [refl, by_cases (p x)];
[simp only [filter_cons_of_pos _ h, countp, ih, if_pos h],
simp only [countp_cons_of_neg _ h, ih, filter_cons_of_neg _ h]]; refl
local attribute [simp] countp_eq_length_filter
@[simp] theorem countp_append (l₁ l₂) : countp p (l₁ ++ l₂) = countp p l₁ + countp p l₂ :=
by simp only [countp_eq_length_filter, filter_append, length_append]
theorem countp_pos {l} : 0 < countp p l ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, p a :=
by simp only [countp_eq_length_filter, length_pos_iff_exists_mem, mem_filter, exists_prop]
theorem countp_le_of_sublist {l₁ l₂} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : countp p l₁ ≤ countp p l₂ :=
by simpa only [countp_eq_length_filter] using length_le_of_sublist (filter_sublist_filter s)
@[simp] theorem countp_filter {q} [decidable_pred q] (l : list α) :
countp p (filter q l) = countp (λ a, p a ∧ q a) l :=
by simp only [countp_eq_length_filter, filter_filter]
end filter
/-! ### count -/
section count
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem count_nil (a : α) : count a [] = 0 := rfl
theorem count_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) :
count a (b :: l) = if a = b then succ (count a l) else count a l := rfl
theorem count_cons' (a b : α) (l : list α) :
count a (b :: l) = count a l + (if a = b then 1 else 0) :=
begin rw count_cons, split_ifs; refl end
@[simp] theorem count_cons_self (a : α) (l : list α) : count a (a::l) = succ (count a l) :=
if_pos rfl
@[simp, priority 990]
theorem count_cons_of_ne {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) (l : list α) : count a (b::l) = count a l :=
if_neg h
theorem count_tail : Π (l : list α) (a : α) (h : 0 < l.length),
l.tail.count a = l.count a - ite (a = list.nth_le l 0 h) 1 0
| (_ :: _) a h := by { rw [count_cons], split_ifs; simp }
theorem count_le_of_sublist (a : α) {l₁ l₂} : l₁ <+ l₂ → count a l₁ ≤ count a l₂ :=
countp_le_of_sublist
theorem count_le_count_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) : count a l ≤ count a (b :: l) :=
count_le_of_sublist _ (sublist_cons _ _)
theorem count_singleton (a : α) : count a [a] = 1 := if_pos rfl
@[simp] theorem count_append (a : α) : ∀ l₁ l₂, count a (l₁ ++ l₂) = count a l₁ + count a l₂ :=
countp_append
theorem count_concat (a : α) (l : list α) : count a (concat l a) = succ (count a l) :=
by simp [-add_comm]
theorem count_pos {a : α} {l : list α} : 0 < count a l ↔ a ∈ l :=
by simp only [count, countp_pos, exists_prop, exists_eq_right']
@[simp, priority 980]
theorem count_eq_zero_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) : count a l = 0 :=
by_contradiction $ λ h', h $ count_pos.1 (nat.pos_of_ne_zero h')
theorem not_mem_of_count_eq_zero {a : α} {l : list α} (h : count a l = 0) : a ∉ l :=
λ h', ne_of_gt (count_pos.2 h') h
@[simp] theorem count_repeat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : count a (repeat a n) = n :=
by rw [count, countp_eq_length_filter, filter_eq_self.2, length_repeat];
exact λ b m, (eq_of_mem_repeat m).symm
theorem le_count_iff_repeat_sublist {a : α} {l : list α} {n : ℕ} : n ≤ count a l ↔ repeat a n <+ l :=
⟨λ h, ((repeat_sublist_repeat a).2 h).trans $
have filter (eq a) l = repeat a (count a l), from eq_repeat.2
⟨by simp only [count, countp_eq_length_filter], λ b m, (of_mem_filter m).symm⟩,
by rw ← this; apply filter_sublist,
λ h, by simpa only [count_repeat] using count_le_of_sublist a h⟩
@[simp] theorem count_filter {p} [decidable_pred p]
{a} {l : list α} (h : p a) : count a (filter p l) = count a l :=
by simp only [count, countp_filter]; congr; exact
set.ext (λ b, and_iff_left_of_imp (λ e, e ▸ h))
end count
/-! ### prefix, suffix, infix -/
@[simp] theorem prefix_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ <+: l₁ ++ l₂ := ⟨l₂, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem suffix_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₂ <:+ l₁ ++ l₂ := ⟨l₁, rfl⟩
theorem infix_append (l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α) : l₂ <:+: l₁ ++ l₂ ++ l₃ := ⟨l₁, l₃, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem infix_append' (l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α) : l₂ <:+: l₁ ++ (l₂ ++ l₃) :=
by rw ← list.append_assoc; apply infix_append
theorem nil_prefix (l : list α) : [] <+: l := ⟨l, rfl⟩
theorem nil_suffix (l : list α) : [] <:+ l := ⟨l, append_nil _⟩
@[refl] theorem prefix_refl (l : list α) : l <+: l := ⟨[], append_nil _⟩
@[refl] theorem suffix_refl (l : list α) : l <:+ l := ⟨[], rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem suffix_cons (a : α) : ∀ l, l <:+ a :: l := suffix_append [a]
theorem prefix_concat (a : α) (l) : l <+: concat l a := by simp
theorem infix_of_prefix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ → l₁ <:+: l₂ :=
λ⟨t, h⟩, ⟨[], t, h⟩
theorem infix_of_suffix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₁ <:+: l₂ :=
λ⟨t, h⟩, ⟨t, [], by simp only [h, append_nil]⟩
@[refl] theorem infix_refl (l : list α) : l <:+: l := infix_of_prefix $ prefix_refl l
theorem nil_infix (l : list α) : [] <:+: l := infix_of_prefix $ nil_prefix l
theorem infix_cons {L₁ L₂ : list α} {x : α} : L₁ <:+: L₂ → L₁ <:+: x :: L₂ :=
λ⟨LP, LS, H⟩, ⟨x :: LP, LS, H ▸ rfl⟩
@[trans] theorem is_prefix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}, l₁ <+: l₂ → l₂ <+: l₃ → l₁ <+: l₃
| l ._ ._ ⟨r₁, rfl⟩ ⟨r₂, rfl⟩ := ⟨r₁ ++ r₂, (append_assoc _ _ _).symm⟩
@[trans] theorem is_suffix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}, l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₂ <:+ l₃ → l₁ <:+ l₃
| l ._ ._ ⟨l₁, rfl⟩ ⟨l₂, rfl⟩ := ⟨l₂ ++ l₁, append_assoc _ _ _⟩
@[trans] theorem is_infix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}, l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₂ <:+: l₃ → l₁ <:+: l₃
| l ._ ._ ⟨l₁, r₁, rfl⟩ ⟨l₂, r₂, rfl⟩ := ⟨l₂ ++ l₁, r₁ ++ r₂, by simp only [append_assoc]⟩
theorem sublist_of_infix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
λ⟨s, t, h⟩, by rw [← h]; exact (sublist_append_right _ _).trans (sublist_append_left _ _)
theorem sublist_of_prefix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
sublist_of_infix ∘ infix_of_prefix
theorem sublist_of_suffix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
sublist_of_infix ∘ infix_of_suffix
theorem reverse_suffix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : reverse l₁ <:+ reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
⟨λ ⟨r, e⟩, ⟨reverse r,
by rw [← reverse_reverse l₁, ← reverse_append, e, reverse_reverse]⟩,
λ ⟨r, e⟩, ⟨reverse r, by rw [← reverse_append, e]⟩⟩
theorem reverse_prefix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : reverse l₁ <+: reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ <:+ l₂ :=
by rw ← reverse_suffix; simp only [reverse_reverse]
theorem length_le_of_infix {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <:+: l₂) : length l₁ ≤ length l₂ :=
length_le_of_sublist $ sublist_of_infix s
theorem eq_nil_of_infix_nil {l : list α} (s : l <:+: []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_sublist_nil $ sublist_of_infix s
theorem eq_nil_of_prefix_nil {l : list α} (s : l <+: []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_infix_nil $ infix_of_prefix s
theorem eq_nil_of_suffix_nil {l : list α} (s : l <:+ []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_infix_nil $ infix_of_suffix s
theorem infix_iff_prefix_suffix (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ <:+: l₂ ↔ ∃ t, l₁ <+: t ∧ t <:+ l₂ :=
⟨λ⟨s, t, e⟩, ⟨l₁ ++ t, ⟨_, rfl⟩, by rw [← e, append_assoc]; exact ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩,
λ⟨._, ⟨t, rfl⟩, ⟨s, e⟩⟩, ⟨s, t, by rw append_assoc; exact e⟩⟩
theorem eq_of_infix_of_length_eq {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <:+: l₂) : length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq $ sublist_of_infix s
theorem eq_of_prefix_of_length_eq {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <+: l₂) : length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq $ sublist_of_prefix s
theorem eq_of_suffix_of_length_eq {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <:+ l₂) : length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq $ sublist_of_suffix s
theorem prefix_of_prefix_length_le : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α},
l₁ <+: l₃ → l₂ <+: l₃ → length l₁ ≤ length l₂ → l₁ <+: l₂
| [] l₂ l₃ h₁ h₂ _ := nil_prefix _
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) _ ⟨r₁, rfl⟩ ⟨r₂, e⟩ ll := begin
injection e with _ e', subst b,
rcases prefix_of_prefix_length_le ⟨_, rfl⟩ ⟨_, e'⟩
(le_of_succ_le_succ ll) with ⟨r₃, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨r₃, rfl⟩
end
theorem prefix_or_prefix_of_prefix {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}
(h₁ : l₁ <+: l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <+: l₃) : l₁ <+: l₂ ∨ l₂ <+: l₁ :=
(le_total (length l₁) (length l₂)).imp
(prefix_of_prefix_length_le h₁ h₂)
(prefix_of_prefix_length_le h₂ h₁)
theorem suffix_of_suffix_length_le {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}
(h₁ : l₁ <:+ l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <:+ l₃) (ll : length l₁ ≤ length l₂) : l₁ <:+ l₂ :=
reverse_prefix.1 $ prefix_of_prefix_length_le
(reverse_prefix.2 h₁) (reverse_prefix.2 h₂) (by simp [ll])
theorem suffix_or_suffix_of_suffix {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}
(h₁ : l₁ <:+ l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <:+ l₃) : l₁ <:+ l₂ ∨ l₂ <:+ l₁ :=
(prefix_or_prefix_of_prefix (reverse_prefix.2 h₁) (reverse_prefix.2 h₂)).imp
reverse_prefix.1 reverse_prefix.1
theorem infix_of_mem_join : ∀ {L : list (list α)} {l}, l ∈ L → l <:+: join L
| (_ :: L) l (or.inl rfl) := infix_append [] _ _
| (l' :: L) l (or.inr h) :=
is_infix.trans (infix_of_mem_join h) $ infix_of_suffix $ suffix_append _ _
theorem prefix_append_right_inj {l₁ l₂ : list α} (l) : l ++ l₁ <+: l ++ l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
exists_congr $ λ r, by rw [append_assoc, append_right_inj]
theorem prefix_cons_inj {l₁ l₂ : list α} (a) : a :: l₁ <+: a :: l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
prefix_append_right_inj [a]
theorem take_prefix (n) (l : list α) : take n l <+: l := ⟨_, take_append_drop _ _⟩
theorem drop_suffix (n) (l : list α) : drop n l <:+ l := ⟨_, take_append_drop _ _⟩
theorem prefix_iff_eq_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ ↔ l₁ ++ drop (length l₁) l₂ = l₂ :=
⟨by rintros ⟨r, rfl⟩; rw drop_left, λ e, ⟨_, e⟩⟩
theorem suffix_iff_eq_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+ l₂ ↔ take (length l₂ - length l₁) l₂ ++ l₁ = l₂ :=
⟨by rintros ⟨r, rfl⟩; simp only [length_append, nat.add_sub_cancel, take_left], λ e, ⟨_, e⟩⟩
theorem prefix_iff_eq_take {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ ↔ l₁ = take (length l₁) l₂ :=
⟨λ h, append_right_cancel $
(prefix_iff_eq_append.1 h).trans (take_append_drop _ _).symm,
λ e, e.symm ▸ take_prefix _ _⟩
theorem suffix_iff_eq_drop {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+ l₂ ↔ l₁ = drop (length l₂ - length l₁) l₂ :=
⟨λ h, append_left_cancel $
(suffix_iff_eq_append.1 h).trans (take_append_drop _ _).symm,
λ e, e.symm ▸ drop_suffix _ _⟩
instance decidable_prefix [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <+: l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true ⟨l₂, rfl⟩
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ λ ⟨t, te⟩, list.no_confusion te
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) :=
if h : a = b then
@decidable_of_iff _ _ (by rw [← h, prefix_cons_inj])
(decidable_prefix l₁ l₂)
else
is_false $ λ ⟨t, te⟩, h $ by injection te
-- Alternatively, use mem_tails
instance decidable_suffix [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <:+ l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true ⟨l₂, append_nil _⟩
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ mt (length_le_of_sublist ∘ sublist_of_suffix) dec_trivial
| l₁ l₂ := let len1 := length l₁, len2 := length l₂ in
if hl : len1 ≤ len2 then
decidable_of_iff' (l₁ = drop (len2-len1) l₂) suffix_iff_eq_drop
else is_false $ λ h, hl $ length_le_of_sublist $ sublist_of_suffix h
@[simp] theorem mem_inits : ∀ (s t : list α), s ∈ inits t ↔ s <+: t
| s [] := suffices s = nil ↔ s <+: nil, by simpa only [inits, mem_singleton],
⟨λh, h.symm ▸ prefix_refl [], eq_nil_of_prefix_nil⟩
| s (a::t) :=
suffices (s = nil ∨ ∃ l ∈ inits t, a :: l = s) ↔ s <+: a :: t, by simpa,
⟨λo, match s, o with
| ._, or.inl rfl := ⟨_, rfl⟩
| s, or.inr ⟨r, hr, hs⟩ := let ⟨s, ht⟩ := (mem_inits _ _).1 hr in
by rw [← hs, ← ht]; exact ⟨s, rfl⟩
end, λmi, match s, mi with
| [], ⟨._, rfl⟩ := or.inl rfl
| (b::s), ⟨r, hr⟩ := list.no_confusion hr $ λba (st : s++r = t), or.inr $
by rw ba; exact ⟨_, (mem_inits _ _).2 ⟨_, st⟩, rfl⟩
end⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_tails : ∀ (s t : list α), s ∈ tails t ↔ s <:+ t
| s [] := by simp only [tails, mem_singleton]; exact ⟨λh, by rw h; exact suffix_refl [], eq_nil_of_suffix_nil⟩
| s (a::t) := by simp only [tails, mem_cons_iff, mem_tails s t]; exact show s = a :: t ∨ s <:+ t ↔ s <:+ a :: t, from
⟨λo, match s, t, o with
| ._, t, or.inl rfl := suffix_refl _
| s, ._, or.inr ⟨l, rfl⟩ := ⟨a::l, rfl⟩
end, λe, match s, t, e with
| ._, t, ⟨[], rfl⟩ := or.inl rfl
| s, t, ⟨b::l, he⟩ := list.no_confusion he (λab lt, or.inr ⟨l, lt⟩)
end⟩
instance decidable_infix [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <:+: l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true ⟨[], l₂, rfl⟩
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ λ⟨s, t, te⟩, absurd te $ append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_left _ _ $
append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right _ _ $ λh, list.no_confusion h
| l₁ l₂ := decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (list.decidable_bex (λt, l₁ <+: t) (tails l₂)) $
by refine (exists_congr (λt, _)).trans (infix_iff_prefix_suffix _ _).symm;
exact ⟨λ⟨h1, h2⟩, ⟨h2, (mem_tails _ _).1 h1⟩, λ⟨h2, h1⟩, ⟨(mem_tails _ _).2 h1, h2⟩⟩
/-! ### sublists -/
@[simp] theorem sublists'_nil : sublists' (@nil α) = [[]] := rfl
@[simp, priority 1100] theorem sublists'_singleton (a : α) : sublists' [a] = [[], [a]] := rfl
theorem map_sublists'_aux (g : list β → list γ) (l : list α) (f r) :
map g (sublists'_aux l f r) = sublists'_aux l (g ∘ f) (map g r) :=
by induction l generalizing f r; [refl, simp only [*, sublists'_aux]]
theorem sublists'_aux_append (r' : list (list β)) (l : list α) (f r) :
sublists'_aux l f (r ++ r') = sublists'_aux l f r ++ r' :=
by induction l generalizing f r; [refl, simp only [*, sublists'_aux]]
theorem sublists'_aux_eq_sublists' (l f r) :
@sublists'_aux α β l f r = map f (sublists' l) ++ r :=
by rw [sublists', map_sublists'_aux, ← sublists'_aux_append]; refl
@[simp] theorem sublists'_cons (a : α) (l : list α) :
sublists' (a :: l) = sublists' l ++ map (cons a) (sublists' l) :=
by rw [sublists', sublists'_aux]; simp only [sublists'_aux_eq_sublists', map_id, append_nil]; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_sublists' {s t : list α} : s ∈ sublists' t ↔ s <+ t :=
begin
induction t with a t IH generalizing s,
{ simp only [sublists'_nil, mem_singleton],
exact ⟨λ h, by rw h, eq_nil_of_sublist_nil⟩ },
simp only [sublists'_cons, mem_append, IH, mem_map],
split; intro h, rcases h with h | ⟨s, h, rfl⟩,
{ exact sublist_cons_of_sublist _ h },
{ exact cons_sublist_cons _ h },
{ cases h with _ _ _ h s _ _ h,
{ exact or.inl h },
{ exact or.inr ⟨s, h, rfl⟩ } }
end
@[simp] theorem length_sublists' : ∀ l : list α, length (sublists' l) = 2 ^ length l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by simp only [sublists'_cons, length_append, length_sublists' l, length_map,
length, pow_succ, mul_succ, mul_zero, zero_add]
@[simp] theorem sublists_nil : sublists (@nil α) = [[]] := rfl
@[simp] theorem sublists_singleton (a : α) : sublists [a] = [[], [a]] := rfl
theorem sublists_aux₁_eq_sublists_aux : ∀ l (f : list α → list β),
sublists_aux₁ l f = sublists_aux l (λ ys r, f ys ++ r)
| [] f := rfl
| (a::l) f := by rw [sublists_aux₁, sublists_aux]; simp only [*, append_assoc]
theorem sublists_aux_cons_eq_sublists_aux₁ (l : list α) :
sublists_aux l cons = sublists_aux₁ l (λ x, [x]) :=
by rw [sublists_aux₁_eq_sublists_aux]; refl
theorem sublists_aux_eq_foldr.aux {a : α} {l : list α}
(IH₁ : ∀ (f : list α → list β → list β), sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons))
(IH₂ : ∀ (f : list α → list (list α) → list (list α)),
sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons))
(f : list α → list β → list β) : sublists_aux (a::l) f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux (a::l) cons) :=
begin
simp only [sublists_aux, foldr_cons], rw [IH₂, IH₁], congr' 1,
induction sublists_aux l cons with _ _ ih, {refl},
simp only [ih, foldr_cons]
end
theorem sublists_aux_eq_foldr (l : list α) : ∀ (f : list α → list β → list β),
sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons) :=
suffices _ ∧ ∀ f : list α → list (list α) → list (list α),
sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons),
from this.1,
begin
induction l with a l IH, {split; intro; refl},
exact ⟨sublists_aux_eq_foldr.aux IH.1 IH.2,
sublists_aux_eq_foldr.aux IH.2 IH.2⟩
end
theorem sublists_aux_cons_cons (l : list α) (a : α) :
sublists_aux (a::l) cons = [a] :: foldr (λys r, ys :: (a :: ys) :: r) [] (sublists_aux l cons) :=
by rw [← sublists_aux_eq_foldr]; refl
theorem sublists_aux₁_append : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α) (f : list α → list β),
sublists_aux₁ (l₁ ++ l₂) f = sublists_aux₁ l₁ f ++
sublists_aux₁ l₂ (λ x, f x ++ sublists_aux₁ l₁ (f ∘ (++ x)))
| [] l₂ f := by simp only [sublists_aux₁, nil_append, append_nil]
| (a::l₁) l₂ f := by simp only [sublists_aux₁, cons_append, sublists_aux₁_append l₁, append_assoc]; refl
theorem sublists_aux₁_concat (l : list α) (a : α) (f : list α → list β) :
sublists_aux₁ (l ++ [a]) f = sublists_aux₁ l f ++
f [a] ++ sublists_aux₁ l (λ x, f (x ++ [a])) :=
by simp only [sublists_aux₁_append, sublists_aux₁, append_assoc, append_nil]
theorem sublists_aux₁_bind : ∀ (l : list α)
(f : list α → list β) (g : β → list γ),
(sublists_aux₁ l f).bind g = sublists_aux₁ l (λ x, (f x).bind g)
| [] f g := rfl
| (a::l) f g := by simp only [sublists_aux₁, bind_append, sublists_aux₁_bind l]
theorem sublists_aux_cons_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
sublists_aux (l₁ ++ l₂) cons = sublists_aux l₁ cons ++
(do x ← sublists_aux l₂ cons, (++ x) <$> sublists l₁) :=
begin
simp only [sublists, sublists_aux_cons_eq_sublists_aux₁, sublists_aux₁_append, bind_eq_bind, sublists_aux₁_bind],
congr, funext x, apply congr_arg _,
rw [← bind_ret_eq_map, sublists_aux₁_bind], exact (append_nil _).symm
end
theorem sublists_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
sublists (l₁ ++ l₂) = (do x ← sublists l₂, (++ x) <$> sublists l₁) :=
by simp only [map, sublists, sublists_aux_cons_append, map_eq_map, bind_eq_bind,
cons_bind, map_id', append_nil, cons_append, map_id' (λ _, rfl)]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem sublists_concat (l : list α) (a : α) :
sublists (l ++ [a]) = sublists l ++ map (λ x, x ++ [a]) (sublists l) :=
by rw [sublists_append, sublists_singleton, bind_eq_bind, cons_bind, cons_bind, nil_bind,
map_eq_map, map_eq_map, map_id' (append_nil), append_nil]
theorem sublists_reverse (l : list α) : sublists (reverse l) = map reverse (sublists' l) :=
by induction l with hd tl ih; [refl,
simp only [reverse_cons, sublists_append, sublists'_cons, map_append, ih, sublists_singleton,
map_eq_map, bind_eq_bind, map_map, cons_bind, append_nil, nil_bind, (∘)]]
theorem sublists_eq_sublists' (l : list α) : sublists l = map reverse (sublists' (reverse l)) :=
by rw [← sublists_reverse, reverse_reverse]
theorem sublists'_reverse (l : list α) : sublists' (reverse l) = map reverse (sublists l) :=
by simp only [sublists_eq_sublists', map_map, map_id' (reverse_reverse)]
theorem sublists'_eq_sublists (l : list α) : sublists' l = map reverse (sublists (reverse l)) :=
by rw [← sublists'_reverse, reverse_reverse]
theorem sublists_aux_ne_nil : ∀ (l : list α), [] ∉ sublists_aux l cons
| [] := id
| (a::l) := begin
rw [sublists_aux_cons_cons],
refine not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem (cons_ne_nil _ _).symm _,
have := sublists_aux_ne_nil l, revert this,
induction sublists_aux l cons; intro, {rwa foldr},
simp only [foldr, mem_cons_iff, false_or, not_or_distrib],
exact ⟨ne_of_not_mem_cons this, ih (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons this)⟩
end
@[simp] theorem mem_sublists {s t : list α} : s ∈ sublists t ↔ s <+ t :=
by rw [← reverse_sublist_iff, ← mem_sublists',
sublists'_reverse, mem_map_of_inj reverse_injective]
@[simp] theorem length_sublists (l : list α) : length (sublists l) = 2 ^ length l :=
by simp only [sublists_eq_sublists', length_map, length_sublists', length_reverse]
theorem map_ret_sublist_sublists (l : list α) : map list.ret l <+ sublists l :=
reverse_rec_on l (nil_sublist _) $
λ l a IH, by simp only [map, map_append, sublists_concat]; exact
((append_sublist_append_left _).2 $ singleton_sublist.2 $
mem_map.2 ⟨[], mem_sublists.2 (nil_sublist _), by refl⟩).trans
((append_sublist_append_right _).2 IH)
/-! ### sublists_len -/
/-- Auxiliary function to construct the list of all sublists of a given length. Given an
integer `n`, a list `l`, a function `f` and an auxiliary list `L`, it returns the list made of
of `f` applied to all sublists of `l` of length `n`, concatenated with `L`. -/
def sublists_len_aux {α β : Type*} : ℕ → list α → (list α → β) → list β → list β
| 0 l f r := f [] :: r
| (n+1) [] f r := r
| (n+1) (a::l) f r := sublists_len_aux (n + 1) l f
(sublists_len_aux n l (f ∘ list.cons a) r)
/-- The list of all sublists of a list `l` that are of length `n`. For instance, for
`l = [0, 1, 2, 3]` and `n = 2`, one gets
`[[2, 3], [1, 3], [1, 2], [0, 3], [0, 2], [0, 1]]`. -/
def sublists_len {α : Type*} (n : ℕ) (l : list α) : list (list α) :=
sublists_len_aux n l id []
lemma sublists_len_aux_append {α β γ : Type*} :
∀ (n : ℕ) (l : list α) (f : list α → β) (g : β → γ) (r : list β) (s : list γ),
sublists_len_aux n l (g ∘ f) (r.map g ++ s) =
(sublists_len_aux n l f r).map g ++ s
| 0 l f g r s := rfl
| (n+1) [] f g r s := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) f g r s := begin
unfold sublists_len_aux,
rw [show ((g ∘ f) ∘ list.cons a) = (g ∘ f ∘ list.cons a), by refl,
sublists_len_aux_append, sublists_len_aux_append]
end
lemma sublists_len_aux_eq {α β : Type*} (l : list α) (n) (f : list α → β) (r) :
sublists_len_aux n l f r = (sublists_len n l).map f ++ r :=
by rw [sublists_len, ← sublists_len_aux_append]; refl
lemma sublists_len_aux_zero {α : Type*} (l : list α) (f : list α → β) (r) :
sublists_len_aux 0 l f r = f [] :: r := by cases l; refl
@[simp] lemma sublists_len_zero {α : Type*} (l : list α) :
sublists_len 0 l = [[]] := sublists_len_aux_zero _ _ _
@[simp] lemma sublists_len_succ_nil {α : Type*} (n) :
sublists_len (n+1) (@nil α) = [] := rfl
@[simp] lemma sublists_len_succ_cons {α : Type*} (n) (a : α) (l) :
sublists_len (n + 1) (a::l) =
sublists_len (n + 1) l ++ (sublists_len n l).map (cons a) :=
by rw [sublists_len, sublists_len_aux, sublists_len_aux_eq,
sublists_len_aux_eq, map_id, append_nil]; refl
@[simp] lemma length_sublists_len {α : Type*} : ∀ n (l : list α),
length (sublists_len n l) = nat.choose (length l) n
| 0 l := by simp
| (n+1) [] := by simp
| (n+1) (a::l) := by simp [-add_comm, nat.choose, *]; apply add_comm
lemma sublists_len_sublist_sublists' {α : Type*} : ∀ n (l : list α),
sublists_len n l <+ sublists' l
| 0 l := singleton_sublist.2 (mem_sublists'.2 (nil_sublist _))
| (n+1) [] := nil_sublist _
| (n+1) (a::l) := begin
rw [sublists_len_succ_cons, sublists'_cons],
exact (sublists_len_sublist_sublists' _ _).append
((sublists_len_sublist_sublists' _ _).map _)
end
lemma sublists_len_sublist_of_sublist
{α : Type*} (n) {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : sublists_len n l₁ <+ sublists_len n l₂ :=
begin
induction n with n IHn generalizing l₁ l₂, {simp},
induction h with l₁ l₂ a s IH l₁ l₂ a s IH, {refl},
{ refine IH.trans _,
rw sublists_len_succ_cons,
apply sublist_append_left },
{ simp [sublists_len_succ_cons],
exact IH.append ((IHn s).map _) }
end
lemma length_of_sublists_len {α : Type*} : ∀ {n} {l l' : list α},
l' ∈ sublists_len n l → length l' = n
| 0 l l' (or.inl rfl) := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) l' h := begin
rw [sublists_len_succ_cons, mem_append, mem_map] at h,
rcases h with h | ⟨l', h, rfl⟩,
{ exact length_of_sublists_len h },
{ exact congr_arg (+1) (length_of_sublists_len h) },
end
lemma mem_sublists_len_self {α : Type*} {l l' : list α}
(h : l' <+ l) : l' ∈ sublists_len (length l') l :=
begin
induction h with l₁ l₂ a s IH l₁ l₂ a s IH,
{ exact or.inl rfl },
{ cases l₁ with b l₁,
{ exact or.inl rfl },
{ rw [length, sublists_len_succ_cons],
exact mem_append_left _ IH } },
{ rw [length, sublists_len_succ_cons],
exact mem_append_right _ (mem_map.2 ⟨_, IH, rfl⟩) }
end
@[simp] lemma mem_sublists_len {α : Type*} {n} {l l' : list α} :
l' ∈ sublists_len n l ↔ l' <+ l ∧ length l' = n :=
⟨λ h, ⟨mem_sublists'.1
((sublists_len_sublist_sublists' _ _).subset h),
length_of_sublists_len h⟩,
λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₂ ▸ mem_sublists_len_self h₁⟩
/-! ### permutations -/
section permutations
@[simp] theorem permutations_aux_nil (is : list α) : permutations_aux [] is = [] :=
by rw [permutations_aux, permutations_aux.rec]
@[simp] theorem permutations_aux_cons (t : α) (ts is : list α) :
permutations_aux (t :: ts) is = foldr (λy r, (permutations_aux2 t ts r y id).2)
(permutations_aux ts (t::is)) (permutations is) :=
by rw [permutations_aux, permutations_aux.rec]; refl
end permutations
/-! ### insert -/
section insert
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem insert_nil (a : α) : insert a nil = [a] := rfl
theorem insert.def (a : α) (l : list α) : insert a l = if a ∈ l then l else a :: l := rfl
@[simp, priority 980]
theorem insert_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : insert a l = l :=
by simp only [insert.def, if_pos h]
@[simp, priority 970]
theorem insert_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) : insert a l = a :: l :=
by simp only [insert.def, if_neg h]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_insert_iff {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ insert b l ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ l :=
begin
by_cases h' : b ∈ l,
{ simp only [insert_of_mem h'],
apply (or_iff_right_of_imp _).symm,
exact λ e, e.symm ▸ h' },
simp only [insert_of_not_mem h', mem_cons_iff]
end
@[simp] theorem suffix_insert (a : α) (l : list α) : l <:+ insert a l :=
by by_cases a ∈ l; [simp only [insert_of_mem h], simp only [insert_of_not_mem h, suffix_cons]]
@[simp] theorem mem_insert_self (a : α) (l : list α) : a ∈ insert a l :=
mem_insert_iff.2 (or.inl rfl)
theorem mem_insert_of_mem {a b : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : a ∈ insert b l :=
mem_insert_iff.2 (or.inr h)
theorem eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert {a b : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ insert b l) : a = b ∨ a ∈ l :=
mem_insert_iff.1 h
@[simp] theorem length_insert_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
length (insert a l) = length l :=
by rw insert_of_mem h
@[simp] theorem length_insert_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) :
length (insert a l) = length l + 1 :=
by rw insert_of_not_mem h; refl
end insert
/-! ### erasep -/
section erasep
variables {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
@[simp] theorem erasep_nil : [].erasep p = [] := rfl
theorem erasep_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : (a :: l).erasep p = if p a then l else a :: l.erasep p := rfl
@[simp] theorem erasep_cons_of_pos {a : α} {l : list α} (h : p a) : (a :: l).erasep p = l :=
by simp [erasep_cons, h]
@[simp] theorem erasep_cons_of_neg {a : α} {l : list α} (h : ¬ p a) : (a::l).erasep p = a :: l.erasep p :=
by simp [erasep_cons, h]
theorem erasep_of_forall_not {l : list α}
(h : ∀ a ∈ l, ¬ p a) : l.erasep p = l :=
by induction l with _ _ ih; [refl,
simp [h _ (or.inl rfl), ih (forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons h)]]
theorem exists_of_erasep {l : list α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬ p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.erasep p = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
begin
induction l with b l IH, {cases al},
by_cases pb : p b,
{ exact ⟨b, [], l, forall_mem_nil _, pb, by simp [pb]⟩ },
{ rcases al with rfl | al, {exact pb.elim pa},
rcases IH al with ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩,
exact ⟨c, b::l₁, l₂, forall_mem_cons.2 ⟨pb, h₁⟩,
h₂, by rw h₃; refl, by simp [pb, h₄]⟩ }
end
theorem exists_or_eq_self_of_erasep (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
l.erasep p = l ∨ ∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬ p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.erasep p = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
begin
by_cases h : ∃ a ∈ l, p a,
{ rcases h with ⟨a, ha, pa⟩,
exact or.inr (exists_of_erasep ha pa) },
{ simp at h, exact or.inl (erasep_of_forall_not h) }
end
@[simp] theorem length_erasep_of_mem {l : list α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
length (l.erasep p) = pred (length l) :=
by rcases exists_of_erasep al pa with ⟨_, l₁, l₂, _, _, e₁, e₂⟩;
rw e₂; simp [-add_comm, e₁]; refl
theorem erasep_append_left {a : α} (pa : p a) :
∀ {l₁ : list α} (l₂), a ∈ l₁ → (l₁++l₂).erasep p = l₁.erasep p ++ l₂
| (x::xs) l₂ h := begin
by_cases h' : p x; simp [h'],
rw erasep_append_left l₂ (mem_of_ne_of_mem (mt _ h') h),
rintro rfl, exact pa
end
theorem erasep_append_right : ∀ {l₁ : list α} (l₂), (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬ p b) → (l₁++l₂).erasep p = l₁ ++ l₂.erasep p
| [] l₂ h := rfl
| (x::xs) l₂ h := by simp [(forall_mem_cons.1 h).1,
erasep_append_right _ (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2]
theorem erasep_sublist (l : list α) : l.erasep p <+ l :=
by rcases exists_or_eq_self_of_erasep p l with h | ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩;
[rw h, {rw [h₄, h₃], simp}]
theorem erasep_subset (l : list α) : l.erasep p ⊆ l :=
(erasep_sublist l).subset
theorem sublist.erasep {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁.erasep p <+ l₂.erasep p :=
begin
induction s,
case list.sublist.slnil { refl },
case list.sublist.cons : l₁ l₂ a s IH {
by_cases h : p a; simp [h],
exacts [IH.trans (erasep_sublist _), IH.cons _ _ _] },
case list.sublist.cons2 : l₁ l₂ a s IH {
by_cases h : p a; simp [h],
exacts [s, IH.cons2 _ _ _] }
end
theorem mem_of_mem_erasep {a : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ l.erasep p → a ∈ l :=
@erasep_subset _ _ _ _ _
@[simp] theorem mem_erasep_of_neg {a : α} {l : list α} (pa : ¬ p a) : a ∈ l.erasep p ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨mem_of_mem_erasep, λ al, begin
rcases exists_or_eq_self_of_erasep p l with h | ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩,
{ rwa h },
{ rw h₄, rw h₃ at al,
have : a ≠ c, {rintro rfl, exact pa.elim h₂},
simpa [this] using al }
end⟩
theorem erasep_map (f : β → α) :
∀ (l : list β), (map f l).erasep p = map f (l.erasep (p ∘ f))
| [] := rfl
| (b::l) := by by_cases p (f b); simp [h, erasep_map l]
@[simp] theorem extractp_eq_find_erasep :
∀ l : list α, extractp p l = (find p l, erasep p l)
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by by_cases pa : p a; simp [extractp, pa, extractp_eq_find_erasep l]
end erasep
/-! ### erase -/
section erase
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem erase_nil (a : α) : [].erase a = [] := rfl
theorem erase_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) : (b :: l).erase a = if b = a then l else b :: l.erase a := rfl
@[simp] theorem erase_cons_head (a : α) (l : list α) : (a :: l).erase a = l :=
by simp only [erase_cons, if_pos rfl]
@[simp] theorem erase_cons_tail {a b : α} (l : list α) (h : b ≠ a) : (b::l).erase a = b :: l.erase a :=
by simp only [erase_cons, if_neg h]; split; refl
theorem erase_eq_erasep (a : α) (l : list α) : l.erase a = l.erasep (eq a) :=
by { induction l with b l, {refl},
by_cases a = b; [simp [h], simp [h, ne.symm h, *]] }
@[simp, priority 980]
theorem erase_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) : l.erase a = l :=
by rw [erase_eq_erasep, erasep_of_forall_not]; rintro b h' rfl; exact h h'
theorem exists_erase_eq {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
∃ l₁ l₂, a ∉ l₁ ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.erase a = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
by rcases exists_of_erasep h rfl with ⟨_, l₁, l₂, h₁, rfl, h₂, h₃⟩;
rw erase_eq_erasep; exact ⟨l₁, l₂, λ h, h₁ _ h rfl, h₂, h₃⟩
@[simp] theorem length_erase_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : length (l.erase a) = pred (length l) :=
by rw erase_eq_erasep; exact length_erasep_of_mem h rfl
theorem erase_append_left {a : α} {l₁ : list α} (l₂) (h : a ∈ l₁) :
(l₁++l₂).erase a = l₁.erase a ++ l₂ :=
by simp [erase_eq_erasep]; exact erasep_append_left (by refl) l₂ h
theorem erase_append_right {a : α} {l₁ : list α} (l₂) (h : a ∉ l₁) :
(l₁++l₂).erase a = l₁ ++ l₂.erase a :=
by rw [erase_eq_erasep, erase_eq_erasep, erasep_append_right];
rintro b h' rfl; exact h h'
theorem erase_sublist (a : α) (l : list α) : l.erase a <+ l :=
by rw erase_eq_erasep; apply erasep_sublist
theorem erase_subset (a : α) (l : list α) : l.erase a ⊆ l :=
(erase_sublist a l).subset
theorem sublist.erase (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁.erase a <+ l₂.erase a :=
by simp [erase_eq_erasep]; exact sublist.erasep h
theorem mem_of_mem_erase {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ l.erase b → a ∈ l :=
@erase_subset _ _ _ _ _
@[simp] theorem mem_erase_of_ne {a b : α} {l : list α} (ab : a ≠ b) : a ∈ l.erase b ↔ a ∈ l :=
by rw erase_eq_erasep; exact mem_erasep_of_neg ab.symm
theorem erase_comm (a b : α) (l : list α) : (l.erase a).erase b = (l.erase b).erase a :=
if ab : a = b then by rw ab else
if ha : a ∈ l then
if hb : b ∈ l then match l, l.erase a, exists_erase_eq ha, hb with
| ._, ._, ⟨l₁, l₂, ha', rfl, rfl⟩, hb :=
if h₁ : b ∈ l₁ then
by rw [erase_append_left _ h₁, erase_append_left _ h₁,
erase_append_right _ (mt mem_of_mem_erase ha'), erase_cons_head]
else
by rw [erase_append_right _ h₁, erase_append_right _ h₁, erase_append_right _ ha',
erase_cons_tail _ ab, erase_cons_head]
end
else by simp only [erase_of_not_mem hb, erase_of_not_mem (mt mem_of_mem_erase hb)]
else by simp only [erase_of_not_mem ha, erase_of_not_mem (mt mem_of_mem_erase ha)]
theorem map_erase [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} (finj : injective f) {a : α}
(l : list α) : map f (l.erase a) = (map f l).erase (f a) :=
by rw [erase_eq_erasep, erase_eq_erasep, erasep_map]; congr;
ext b; simp [finj.eq_iff]
theorem map_foldl_erase [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} (finj : injective f) {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
map f (foldl list.erase l₁ l₂) = foldl (λ l a, l.erase (f a)) (map f l₁) l₂ :=
by induction l₂ generalizing l₁; [refl,
simp only [foldl_cons, map_erase finj, *]]
@[simp] theorem count_erase_self (a : α) : ∀ (s : list α), count a (list.erase s a) = pred (count a s)
| [] := by simp
| (h :: t) :=
begin
rw erase_cons,
by_cases p : h = a,
{ rw [if_pos p, count_cons', if_pos p.symm], simp },
{ rw [if_neg p, count_cons', count_cons', if_neg (λ x : a = h, p x.symm), count_erase_self],
simp, }
end
@[simp] theorem count_erase_of_ne {a b : α} (ab : a ≠ b) : ∀ (s : list α), count a (list.erase s b) = count a s
| [] := by simp
| (x :: xs) :=
begin
rw erase_cons,
split_ifs with h,
{ rw [count_cons', h, if_neg ab], simp },
{ rw [count_cons', count_cons', count_erase_of_ne] }
end
end erase
/-! ### diff -/
section diff
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem diff_nil (l : list α) : l.diff [] = l := rfl
@[simp] theorem diff_cons (l₁ l₂ : list α) (a : α) : l₁.diff (a::l₂) = (l₁.erase a).diff l₂ :=
if h : a ∈ l₁ then by simp only [list.diff, if_pos h]
else by simp only [list.diff, if_neg h, erase_of_not_mem h]
@[simp] theorem nil_diff (l : list α) : [].diff l = [] :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, diff_cons, erase_of_not_mem (not_mem_nil _)]]
theorem diff_eq_foldl : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), l₁.diff l₂ = foldl list.erase l₁ l₂
| l₁ [] := rfl
| l₁ (a::l₂) := (diff_cons l₁ l₂ a).trans (diff_eq_foldl _ _)
@[simp] theorem diff_append (l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α) : l₁.diff (l₂ ++ l₃) = (l₁.diff l₂).diff l₃ :=
by simp only [diff_eq_foldl, foldl_append]
@[simp] theorem map_diff [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} (finj : injective f) {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
map f (l₁.diff l₂) = (map f l₁).diff (map f l₂) :=
by simp only [diff_eq_foldl, foldl_map, map_foldl_erase finj]
theorem diff_sublist : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, l₁.diff l₂ <+ l₁
| l₁ [] := sublist.refl _
| l₁ (a::l₂) := calc l₁.diff (a :: l₂) = (l₁.erase a).diff l₂ : diff_cons _ _ _
... <+ l₁.erase a : diff_sublist _ _
... <+ l₁ : list.erase_sublist _ _
theorem diff_subset (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁.diff l₂ ⊆ l₁ :=
(diff_sublist _ _).subset
theorem mem_diff_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, a ∈ l₁ → a ∉ l₂ → a ∈ l₁.diff l₂
| l₁ [] h₁ h₂ := h₁
| l₁ (b::l₂) h₁ h₂ := by rw diff_cons; exact
mem_diff_of_mem ((mem_erase_of_ne (ne_of_not_mem_cons h₂)).2 h₁) (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons h₂)
theorem sublist.diff_right : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃: list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁.diff l₃ <+ l₂.diff l₃
| l₁ l₂ [] h := h
| l₁ l₂ (a::l₃) h := by simp only
[diff_cons, (h.erase _).diff_right]
theorem erase_diff_erase_sublist_of_sublist {a : α} : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α},
l₁ <+ l₂ → (l₂.erase a).diff (l₁.erase a) <+ l₂.diff l₁
| [] l₂ h := erase_sublist _ _
| (b::l₁) l₂ h := if heq : b = a then by simp only [heq, erase_cons_head, diff_cons]
else by simpa only [erase_cons_head, erase_cons_tail _ heq, diff_cons, erase_comm a b l₂]
using erase_diff_erase_sublist_of_sublist (h.erase b)
end diff
/-! ### enum -/
theorem length_enum_from : ∀ n (l : list α), length (enum_from n l) = length l
| n [] := rfl
| n (a::l) := congr_arg nat.succ (length_enum_from _ _)
theorem length_enum : ∀ (l : list α), length (enum l) = length l := length_enum_from _
@[simp] theorem enum_from_nth : ∀ n (l : list α) m,
nth (enum_from n l) m = (λ a, (n + m, a)) <$> nth l m
| n [] m := rfl
| n (a :: l) 0 := rfl
| n (a :: l) (m+1) := (enum_from_nth (n+1) l m).trans $
by rw [add_right_comm]; refl
@[simp] theorem enum_nth : ∀ (l : list α) n,
nth (enum l) n = (λ a, (n, a)) <$> nth l n :=
by simp only [enum, enum_from_nth, zero_add]; intros; refl
@[simp] theorem enum_from_map_snd : ∀ n (l : list α),
map prod.snd (enum_from n l) = l
| n [] := rfl
| n (a :: l) := congr_arg (cons _) (enum_from_map_snd _ _)
@[simp] theorem enum_map_snd : ∀ (l : list α),
map prod.snd (enum l) = l := enum_from_map_snd _
theorem mem_enum_from {x : α} {i : ℕ} :
∀ {j : ℕ} (xs : list α), (i, x) ∈ xs.enum_from j → j ≤ i ∧ i < j + xs.length ∧ x ∈ xs
| j [] := by simp [enum_from]
| j (y :: ys) :=
suffices i = j ∧ x = y ∨ (i, x) ∈ enum_from (j + 1) ys →
j ≤ i ∧ i < j + (length ys + 1) ∧ (x = y ∨ x ∈ ys),
by simpa [enum_from, mem_enum_from ys],
begin
rintro (h|h),
{ refine ⟨le_of_eq h.1.symm,h.1 ▸ _,or.inl h.2⟩,
apply nat.lt_add_of_pos_right; simp },
{ obtain ⟨hji, hijlen, hmem⟩ := mem_enum_from _ h,
refine ⟨_, _, _⟩,
{ exact le_trans (nat.le_succ _) hji },
{ convert hijlen using 1, ac_refl },
{ simp [hmem] } }
end
/-! ### product -/
@[simp] theorem nil_product (l : list β) : product (@nil α) l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem product_cons (a : α) (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β)
: product (a::l₁) l₂ = map (λ b, (a, b)) l₂ ++ product l₁ l₂ := rfl
@[simp] theorem product_nil : ∀ (l : list α), product l (@nil β) = []
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by rw [product_cons, product_nil]; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_product {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : list β} {a : α} {b : β} :
(a, b) ∈ product l₁ l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ b ∈ l₂ :=
by simp only [product, mem_bind, mem_map, prod.ext_iff, exists_prop,
and.left_comm, exists_and_distrib_left, exists_eq_left, exists_eq_right]
theorem length_product (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β) :
length (product l₁ l₂) = length l₁ * length l₂ :=
by induction l₁ with x l₁ IH; [exact (zero_mul _).symm,
simp only [length, product_cons, length_append, IH,
right_distrib, one_mul, length_map, add_comm]]
/-! ### sigma -/
section
variable {σ : α → Type*}
@[simp] theorem nil_sigma (l : Π a, list (σ a)) : (@nil α).sigma l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem sigma_cons (a : α) (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : Π a, list (σ a))
: (a::l₁).sigma l₂ = map (sigma.mk a) (l₂ a) ++ l₁.sigma l₂ := rfl
@[simp] theorem sigma_nil : ∀ (l : list α), l.sigma (λ a, @nil (σ a)) = []
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by rw [sigma_cons, sigma_nil]; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_sigma {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : Π a, list (σ a)} {a : α} {b : σ a} :
sigma.mk a b ∈ l₁.sigma l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ b ∈ l₂ a :=
by simp only [list.sigma, mem_bind, mem_map, exists_prop, exists_and_distrib_left,
and.left_comm, exists_eq_left, heq_iff_eq, exists_eq_right]
theorem length_sigma (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : Π a, list (σ a)) :
length (l₁.sigma l₂) = (l₁.map (λ a, length (l₂ a))).sum :=
by induction l₁ with x l₁ IH; [refl,
simp only [map, sigma_cons, length_append, length_map, IH, sum_cons]]
end
/-! ### disjoint -/
section disjoint
theorem disjoint.symm {l₁ l₂ : list α} (d : disjoint l₁ l₂) : disjoint l₂ l₁
| a i₂ i₁ := d i₁ i₂
theorem disjoint_comm {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ disjoint l₂ l₁ :=
⟨disjoint.symm, disjoint.symm⟩
theorem disjoint_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ {a}, a ∈ l₁ → a ∉ l₂ := iff.rfl
theorem disjoint_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ {a}, a ∈ l₂ → a ∉ l₁ :=
disjoint_comm
theorem disjoint_iff_ne {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ a ∈ l₁, ∀ b ∈ l₂, a ≠ b :=
by simp only [disjoint_left, imp_not_comm, forall_eq']
theorem disjoint_of_subset_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (ss : l₁ ⊆ l) (d : disjoint l l₂) : disjoint l₁ l₂
| x m₁ := d (ss m₁)
theorem disjoint_of_subset_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (ss : l₂ ⊆ l) (d : disjoint l₁ l) : disjoint l₁ l₂
| x m m₁ := d m (ss m₁)
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_left {a : α} {l₁ l₂} : disjoint (a::l₁) l₂ → disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_of_subset_left (list.subset_cons _ _)
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_right {a : α} {l₁ l₂} : disjoint l₁ (a::l₂) → disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_of_subset_right (list.subset_cons _ _)
@[simp] theorem disjoint_nil_left (l : list α) : disjoint [] l
| a := (not_mem_nil a).elim
@[simp] theorem disjoint_nil_right (l : list α) : disjoint l [] :=
by rw disjoint_comm; exact disjoint_nil_left _
@[simp, priority 1100] theorem singleton_disjoint {l : list α} {a : α} : disjoint [a] l ↔ a ∉ l :=
by simp only [disjoint, mem_singleton, forall_eq]; refl
@[simp, priority 1100] theorem disjoint_singleton {l : list α} {a : α} : disjoint l [a] ↔ a ∉ l :=
by rw disjoint_comm; simp only [singleton_disjoint]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_append_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} :
disjoint (l₁++l₂) l ↔ disjoint l₁ l ∧ disjoint l₂ l :=
by simp only [disjoint, mem_append, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_append_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} :
disjoint l (l₁++l₂) ↔ disjoint l l₁ ∧ disjoint l l₂ :=
disjoint_comm.trans $ by simp only [disjoint_comm, disjoint_append_left]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_cons_left {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
disjoint (a::l₁) l₂ ↔ a ∉ l₂ ∧ disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
(@disjoint_append_left _ [a] l₁ l₂).trans $ by simp only [singleton_disjoint]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_cons_right {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
disjoint l₁ (a::l₂) ↔ a ∉ l₁ ∧ disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_comm.trans $ by simp only [disjoint_comm, disjoint_cons_left]
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint (l₁++l₂) l) : disjoint l₁ l :=
(disjoint_append_left.1 d).1
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint (l₁++l₂) l) : disjoint l₂ l :=
(disjoint_append_left.1 d).2
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_right_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint l (l₁++l₂)) : disjoint l l₁ :=
(disjoint_append_right.1 d).1
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_right_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint l (l₁++l₂)) : disjoint l l₂ :=
(disjoint_append_right.1 d).2
end disjoint
/-! ### union -/
section union
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem nil_union (l : list α) : [] ∪ l = l := rfl
@[simp] theorem cons_union (l₁ l₂ : list α) (a : α) : a :: l₁ ∪ l₂ = insert a (l₁ ∪ l₂) := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_union {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∨ a ∈ l₂ :=
by induction l₁; simp only [nil_union, not_mem_nil, false_or, cons_union, mem_insert_iff, mem_cons_iff, or_assoc, *]
theorem mem_union_left {a : α} {l₁ : list α} (h : a ∈ l₁) (l₂ : list α) : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
mem_union.2 (or.inl h)
theorem mem_union_right {a : α} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α} (h : a ∈ l₂) : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
mem_union.2 (or.inr h)
theorem sublist_suffix_of_union : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, ∃ t, t <+ l₁ ∧ t ++ l₂ = l₁ ∪ l₂
| [] l₂ := ⟨[], by refl, rfl⟩
| (a::l₁) l₂ := let ⟨t, s, e⟩ := sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂ in
if h : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂
then ⟨t, sublist_cons_of_sublist _ s, by simp only [e, cons_union, insert_of_mem h]⟩
else ⟨a::t, cons_sublist_cons _ s, by simp only [cons_append, cons_union, e, insert_of_not_mem h]; split; refl⟩
theorem suffix_union_right (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₂ <:+ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
(sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂).imp (λ a, and.right)
theorem union_sublist_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ∪ l₂ <+ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
let ⟨t, s, e⟩ := sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂ in
e ▸ (append_sublist_append_right _).2 s
theorem forall_mem_union {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
(∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) ↔ (∀ x ∈ l₁, p x) ∧ (∀ x ∈ l₂, p x) :=
by simp only [mem_union, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_union_left {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) : ∀ x ∈ l₁, p x :=
(forall_mem_union.1 h).1
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_union_right {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) : ∀ x ∈ l₂, p x :=
(forall_mem_union.1 h).2
end union
/-! ### inter -/
section inter
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem inter_nil (l : list α) : [] ∩ l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem inter_cons_of_mem {a : α} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α} (h : a ∈ l₂) :
(a::l₁) ∩ l₂ = a :: (l₁ ∩ l₂) :=
if_pos h
@[simp] theorem inter_cons_of_not_mem {a : α} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α} (h : a ∉ l₂) :
(a::l₁) ∩ l₂ = l₁ ∩ l₂ :=
if_neg h
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → a ∈ l₁ :=
mem_of_mem_filter
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → a ∈ l₂ :=
of_mem_filter
theorem mem_inter_of_mem_of_mem {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ → a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ :=
mem_filter_of_mem
@[simp] theorem mem_inter {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ a ∈ l₂ :=
mem_filter
theorem inter_subset_left (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ∩ l₂ ⊆ l₁ :=
filter_subset _
theorem inter_subset_right (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ∩ l₂ ⊆ l₂ :=
λ a, mem_of_mem_inter_right
theorem subset_inter {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (h₁ : l ⊆ l₁) (h₂ : l ⊆ l₂) : l ⊆ l₁ ∩ l₂ :=
λ a h, mem_inter.2 ⟨h₁ h, h₂ h⟩
theorem inter_eq_nil_iff_disjoint {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ ∩ l₂ = [] ↔ disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
by simp only [eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_inter, not_and]; refl
theorem forall_mem_inter_of_forall_left {p : α → Prop} {l₁ : list α} (h : ∀ x ∈ l₁, p x)
(l₂ : list α) :
∀ x, x ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → p x :=
ball.imp_left (λ x, mem_of_mem_inter_left) h
theorem forall_mem_inter_of_forall_right {p : α → Prop} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l₂, p x) :
∀ x, x ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → p x :=
ball.imp_left (λ x, mem_of_mem_inter_right) h
end inter
section choose
variables (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : list α)
lemma choose_spec (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_x p l hp).property
lemma choose_mem (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l := (choose_spec _ _ _).1
lemma choose_property (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) := (choose_spec _ _ _).2
end choose
-- A jumble of lost lemmas:
theorem ilast'_mem : ∀ a l, @ilast' α a l ∈ a :: l
| a [] := or.inl rfl
| a (b::l) := or.inr (ilast'_mem b l)
@[simp] lemma nth_le_attach (L : list α) (i) (H : i < L.attach.length) :
(L.attach.nth_le i H).1 = L.nth_le i (length_attach L ▸ H) :=
calc (L.attach.nth_le i H).1
= (L.attach.map subtype.val).nth_le i (by simpa using H) : by rw nth_le_map'
... = L.nth_le i _ : by congr; apply attach_map_val
end list
@[to_additive]
theorem monoid_hom.map_list_prod {α β : Type*} [monoid α] [monoid β] (f : α →* β) (l : list α) :
f l.prod = (l.map f).prod :=
(l.prod_hom f).symm
namespace list
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_map_hom {α β γ : Type*} [monoid β] [monoid γ] (L : list α) (f : α → β) (g : β →* γ) :
(L.map (g ∘ f)).prod = g ((L.map f).prod) :=
by {rw g.map_list_prod, exact congr_arg _ (map_map _ _ _).symm}
theorem sum_map_mul_left {α : Type*} [semiring α] {β : Type*} (L : list β)
(f : β → α) (r : α) :
(L.map (λ b, r * f b)).sum = r * (L.map f).sum :=
sum_map_hom L f $ add_monoid_hom.mul_left r
theorem sum_map_mul_right {α : Type*} [semiring α] {β : Type*} (L : list β)
(f : β → α) (r : α) :
(L.map (λ b, f b * r)).sum = (L.map f).sum * r :=
sum_map_hom L f $ add_monoid_hom.mul_right r
end list
|
03895f76548765badb77eca8ea812a68657792ae | 55c7fc2bf55d496ace18cd6f3376e12bb14c8cc5 | /test/lint.lean | 298ca38530bedad72a00efa37622188e8553d474 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dupuisf/mathlib | 62de4ec6544bf3b79086afd27b6529acfaf2c1bb | 8582b06b0a5d06c33ee07d0bdf7c646cae22cf36 | refs/heads/master | 1,669,494,854,016 | 1,595,692,409,000 | 1,595,692,409,000 | 272,046,630 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,592,066,143,000 | 1,592,066,142,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,325 | lean | import tactic.lint
import algebra.ring.basic
def foo1 (n m : ℕ) : ℕ := n + 1
def foo2 (n m : ℕ) : m = m := by refl
lemma foo3 (n m : ℕ) : ℕ := n - m
lemma foo.foo (n m : ℕ) : n ≥ n := le_refl n
instance bar.bar : has_add ℕ := by apply_instance -- we don't check the name of instances
lemma foo.bar (ε > 0) : ε = ε := rfl -- >/≥ is allowed in binders (and in fact, in all hypotheses)
-- section
-- local attribute [instance, priority 1001] classical.prop_decidable
-- lemma foo4 : (if 3 = 3 then 1 else 2) = 1 := if_pos (by refl)
-- end
open tactic
meta def fold_over_with_cond {α} (l : list declaration) (tac : declaration → tactic (option α)) :
tactic (list (declaration × α)) :=
l.mmap_filter $ λ d, option.map (λ x, (d, x)) <$> tac d
run_cmd do
let t := name × list ℕ,
e ← get_env,
let l := e.filter (λ d, e.in_current_file' d.to_name ∧ ¬ d.is_auto_or_internal e),
l2 ← fold_over_with_cond l (return ∘ check_unused_arguments),
guard $ l2.length = 4,
let l2 : list t := l2.map $ λ x, ⟨x.1.to_name, x.2⟩,
guard $ (⟨`foo1, [2]⟩ : t) ∈ l2,
guard $ (⟨`foo2, [1]⟩ : t) ∈ l2,
guard $ (⟨`foo.foo, [2]⟩ : t) ∈ l2,
guard $ (⟨`foo.bar, [2]⟩ : t) ∈ l2,
l2 ← fold_over_with_cond l linter.def_lemma.test,
guard $ l2.length = 2,
let l2 : list (name × _) := l2.map $ λ x, ⟨x.1.to_name, x.2⟩,
guard $ ∃(x ∈ l2), (x : name × _).1 = `foo2,
guard $ ∃(x ∈ l2), (x : name × _).1 = `foo3,
l3 ← fold_over_with_cond l linter.dup_namespace.test,
guard $ l3.length = 1,
guard $ ∃(x ∈ l3), (x : declaration × _).1.to_name = `foo.foo,
l4 ← fold_over_with_cond l linter.ge_or_gt.test,
guard $ l4.length = 1,
guard $ ∃(x ∈ l4), (x : declaration × _).1.to_name = `foo.foo,
-- guard $ ∃(x ∈ l4), (x : declaration × _).1.to_name = `foo4,
(_, s) ← lint ff,
guard $ "/- (slow tests skipped) -/\n".is_suffix_of s.to_string,
(_, s2) ← lint tt,
guard $ s.to_string ≠ s2.to_string,
skip
/- check customizability and nolint -/
meta def dummy_check (d : declaration) : tactic (option string) :=
return $ if d.to_name.last = "foo" then some "gotcha!" else none
meta def linter.dummy_linter : linter :=
{ test := dummy_check,
auto_decls := ff,
no_errors_found := "found nothing",
errors_found := "found something" }
@[nolint dummy_linter]
def bar.foo : (if 3 = 3 then 1 else 2) = 1 := if_pos (by refl)
run_cmd do
(_, s) ← lint tt tt [`linter.dummy_linter] tt,
guard $ "/- found something: -/\n#print foo.foo /- gotcha! -/\n".is_suffix_of s.to_string
def incorrect_type_class_argument_test {α : Type} (x : α) [x = x] [decidable_eq α] [group α] :
unit := ()
run_cmd do
d ← get_decl `incorrect_type_class_argument_test,
x ← linter.incorrect_type_class_argument.test d,
guard $ x = some "These are not classes. argument 3: [_inst_1 : x = x]"
section
def impossible_instance_test {α β : Type} [add_group α] : has_add α := infer_instance
local attribute [instance] impossible_instance_test
run_cmd do
d ← get_decl `impossible_instance_test,
x ← linter.impossible_instance.test d,
guard $ x = some "Impossible to infer argument 2: {β : Type}"
def dangerous_instance_test {α β γ : Type} [ring α] [add_comm_group β] [has_coe α β]
[has_inv γ] : has_add β := infer_instance
local attribute [instance] dangerous_instance_test
run_cmd do
d ← get_decl `dangerous_instance_test,
x ← linter.dangerous_instance.test d,
guard $ x = some "The following arguments become metavariables. argument 1: {α : Type}, argument 3: {γ : Type}"
end
section
def foo_has_mul {α} [has_mul α] : has_mul α := infer_instance
local attribute [instance, priority 1] foo_has_mul
run_cmd do
d ← get_decl `has_mul,
some s ← fails_quickly 20 d,
guard $ s = "type-class inference timed out"
local attribute [instance, priority 10000] foo_has_mul
run_cmd do
d ← get_decl `has_mul,
some s ← fails_quickly 3000 d,
guard $ "maximum class-instance resolution depth has been reached".is_prefix_of s
end
/- test of `apply_to_fresh_variables` -/
run_cmd do
e ← mk_const `id,
e2 ← apply_to_fresh_variables e,
type_check e2,
`(@id %%α %%a) ← instantiate_mvars e2,
expr.sort (level.succ $ level.mvar u) ← infer_type α,
skip
|
07757cfe30d4f9e37a411464dfa22b5205618a14 | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/category_theory/preadditive/default.lean | e7e601d26845e83c37067be615cc6942ac308cd7 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 13,328 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel, Jakob von Raumer
-/
import algebra.big_operators.basic
import algebra.hom.group
import algebra.module.basic
import category_theory.endomorphism
import category_theory.limits.shapes.kernels
/-!
# Preadditive categories
A preadditive category is a category in which `X ⟶ Y` is an abelian group in such a way that
composition of morphisms is linear in both variables.
This file contains a definition of preadditive category that directly encodes the definition given
above. The definition could also be phrased as follows: A preadditive category is a category
enriched over the category of Abelian groups. Once the general framework to state this in Lean is
available, the contents of this file should become obsolete.
## Main results
* Definition of preadditive categories and basic properties
* In a preadditive category, `f : Q ⟶ R` is mono if and only if `g ≫ f = 0 → g = 0` for all
composable `g`.
* A preadditive category with kernels has equalizers.
## Implementation notes
The simp normal form for negation and composition is to push negations as far as possible to
the outside. For example, `f ≫ (-g)` and `(-f) ≫ g` both become `-(f ≫ g)`, and `(-f) ≫ (-g)`
is simplified to `f ≫ g`.
## References
* [F. Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra 2*][borceux-vol2]
## Tags
additive, preadditive, Hom group, Ab-category, Ab-enriched
-/
universes v u
open category_theory.limits
open_locale big_operators
namespace category_theory
variables (C : Type u) [category.{v} C]
/-- A category is called preadditive if `P ⟶ Q` is an abelian group such that composition is
linear in both variables. -/
class preadditive :=
(hom_group : Π P Q : C, add_comm_group (P ⟶ Q) . tactic.apply_instance)
(add_comp' : ∀ (P Q R : C) (f f' : P ⟶ Q) (g : Q ⟶ R),
(f + f') ≫ g = f ≫ g + f' ≫ g . obviously)
(comp_add' : ∀ (P Q R : C) (f : P ⟶ Q) (g g' : Q ⟶ R),
f ≫ (g + g') = f ≫ g + f ≫ g' . obviously)
attribute [instance] preadditive.hom_group
restate_axiom preadditive.add_comp'
restate_axiom preadditive.comp_add'
attribute [simp,reassoc] preadditive.add_comp
attribute [reassoc] preadditive.comp_add -- (the linter doesn't like `simp` on this lemma)
attribute [simp] preadditive.comp_add
end category_theory
open category_theory
namespace category_theory
namespace preadditive
section preadditive
open add_monoid_hom
variables {C : Type u} [category.{v} C] [preadditive C]
section induced_category
universes u'
variables {C} {D : Type u'} (F : D → C)
instance induced_category.category : preadditive.{v} (induced_category C F) :=
{ hom_group := λ P Q, @preadditive.hom_group C _ _ (F P) (F Q),
add_comp' := λ P Q R f f' g, add_comp' _ _ _ _ _ _,
comp_add' := λ P Q R f g g', comp_add' _ _ _ _ _ _, }
end induced_category
instance (X : C) : add_comm_group (End X) := by { dsimp [End], apply_instance, }
instance (X : C) : ring (End X) :=
{ left_distrib := λ f g h, preadditive.add_comp X X X g h f,
right_distrib := λ f g h, preadditive.comp_add X X X h f g,
..(infer_instance : add_comm_group (End X)),
..(infer_instance : monoid (End X)) }
/-- Composition by a fixed left argument as a group homomorphism -/
def left_comp {P Q : C} (R : C) (f : P ⟶ Q) : (Q ⟶ R) →+ (P ⟶ R) :=
mk' (λ g, f ≫ g) $ λ g g', by simp
/-- Composition by a fixed right argument as a group homomorphism -/
def right_comp (P : C) {Q R : C} (g : Q ⟶ R) : (P ⟶ Q) →+ (P ⟶ R) :=
mk' (λ f, f ≫ g) $ λ f f', by simp
variables {P Q R : C} (f f' : P ⟶ Q) (g g' : Q ⟶ R)
/-- Composition as a bilinear group homomorphism -/
def comp_hom : (P ⟶ Q) →+ (Q ⟶ R) →+ (P ⟶ R) :=
add_monoid_hom.mk' (λ f, left_comp _ f) $
λ f₁ f₂, add_monoid_hom.ext $ λ g, (right_comp _ g).map_add f₁ f₂
@[simp, reassoc] lemma sub_comp :
(f - f') ≫ g = f ≫ g - f' ≫ g :=
map_sub (right_comp P g) f f'
-- The redundant simp lemma linter says that simp can prove the reassoc version of this lemma.
@[reassoc, simp] lemma comp_sub :
f ≫ (g - g') = f ≫ g - f ≫ g' :=
map_sub (left_comp R f) g g'
@[simp, reassoc] lemma neg_comp : (-f) ≫ g = -(f ≫ g) :=
map_neg (right_comp P g) f
/- The redundant simp lemma linter says that simp can prove the reassoc version of this lemma. -/
@[reassoc, simp] lemma comp_neg : f ≫ (-g) = -(f ≫ g) :=
map_neg (left_comp R f) g
@[reassoc] lemma neg_comp_neg : (-f) ≫ (-g) = f ≫ g :=
by simp
lemma nsmul_comp (n : ℕ) : (n • f) ≫ g = n • (f ≫ g) :=
map_nsmul (right_comp P g) n f
lemma comp_nsmul (n : ℕ) : f ≫ (n • g) = n • (f ≫ g) :=
map_nsmul (left_comp R f) n g
lemma zsmul_comp (n : ℤ) : (n • f) ≫ g = n • (f ≫ g) :=
map_zsmul (right_comp P g) n f
lemma comp_zsmul (n : ℤ) : f ≫ (n • g) = n • (f ≫ g) :=
map_zsmul (left_comp R f) n g
@[reassoc] lemma comp_sum {P Q R : C} {J : Type*} (s : finset J) (f : P ⟶ Q) (g : J → (Q ⟶ R)) :
f ≫ ∑ j in s, g j = ∑ j in s, f ≫ g j :=
map_sum (left_comp R f) _ _
@[reassoc] lemma sum_comp {P Q R : C} {J : Type*} (s : finset J) (f : J → (P ⟶ Q)) (g : Q ⟶ R) :
(∑ j in s, f j) ≫ g = ∑ j in s, f j ≫ g :=
map_sum (right_comp P g) _ _
instance {P Q : C} {f : P ⟶ Q} [epi f] : epi (-f) :=
⟨λ R g g' H, by rwa [neg_comp, neg_comp, ←comp_neg, ←comp_neg, cancel_epi, neg_inj] at H⟩
instance {P Q : C} {f : P ⟶ Q} [mono f] : mono (-f) :=
⟨λ R g g' H, by rwa [comp_neg, comp_neg, ←neg_comp, ←neg_comp, cancel_mono, neg_inj] at H⟩
@[priority 100]
instance preadditive_has_zero_morphisms : has_zero_morphisms C :=
{ has_zero := infer_instance,
comp_zero' := λ P Q f R, show left_comp R f 0 = 0, from map_zero _,
zero_comp' := λ P Q R f, show right_comp P f 0 = 0, from map_zero _ }
instance module_End_right {X Y : C} : module (End Y) (X ⟶ Y) :=
{ smul_add := λ r f g, add_comp _ _ _ _ _ _,
smul_zero := λ r, zero_comp,
add_smul := λ r s f, comp_add _ _ _ _ _ _,
zero_smul := λ r, comp_zero }
lemma mono_of_cancel_zero {Q R : C} (f : Q ⟶ R) (h : ∀ {P : C} (g : P ⟶ Q), g ≫ f = 0 → g = 0) :
mono f :=
⟨λ P g g' hg, sub_eq_zero.1 $ h _ $ (map_sub (right_comp P f) g g').trans $ sub_eq_zero.2 hg⟩
lemma mono_iff_cancel_zero {Q R : C} (f : Q ⟶ R) :
mono f ↔ ∀ (P : C) (g : P ⟶ Q), g ≫ f = 0 → g = 0 :=
⟨λ m P g, by exactI zero_of_comp_mono _, mono_of_cancel_zero f⟩
lemma mono_of_kernel_zero {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} [has_limit (parallel_pair f 0)]
(w : kernel.ι f = 0) : mono f :=
mono_of_cancel_zero f (λ P g h, by rw [←kernel.lift_ι f g h, w, limits.comp_zero])
lemma epi_of_cancel_zero {P Q : C} (f : P ⟶ Q) (h : ∀ {R : C} (g : Q ⟶ R), f ≫ g = 0 → g = 0) :
epi f :=
⟨λ R g g' hg, sub_eq_zero.1 $ h _ $ (map_sub (left_comp R f) g g').trans $ sub_eq_zero.2 hg⟩
lemma epi_iff_cancel_zero {P Q : C} (f : P ⟶ Q) :
epi f ↔ ∀ (R : C) (g : Q ⟶ R), f ≫ g = 0 → g = 0 :=
⟨λ e R g, by exactI zero_of_epi_comp _, epi_of_cancel_zero f⟩
lemma epi_of_cokernel_zero {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} [has_colimit (parallel_pair f 0 )]
(w : cokernel.π f = 0) : epi f :=
epi_of_cancel_zero f (λ P g h, by rw [←cokernel.π_desc f g h, w, limits.zero_comp])
namespace is_iso
@[simp] lemma comp_left_eq_zero [is_iso f] :
f ≫ g = 0 ↔ g = 0 :=
by rw [← is_iso.eq_inv_comp, limits.comp_zero]
@[simp] lemma comp_right_eq_zero [is_iso g] :
f ≫ g = 0 ↔ f = 0 :=
by rw [← is_iso.eq_comp_inv, limits.zero_comp]
end is_iso
open_locale zero_object
variables [has_zero_object C]
lemma mono_of_kernel_iso_zero {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} [has_limit (parallel_pair f 0)]
(w : kernel f ≅ 0) : mono f :=
mono_of_kernel_zero (zero_of_source_iso_zero _ w)
lemma epi_of_cokernel_iso_zero {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} [has_colimit (parallel_pair f 0)]
(w : cokernel f ≅ 0) : epi f :=
epi_of_cokernel_zero (zero_of_target_iso_zero _ w)
end preadditive
section equalizers
variables {C : Type u} [category.{v} C] [preadditive C]
section
variables {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Y}
/-- Map a kernel cone on the difference of two morphisms to the equalizer fork. -/
def fork_of_kernel_fork (c : kernel_fork (f - g)) : fork f g :=
fork.of_ι c.ι $ by rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← comp_sub, c.condition]
/-- Map any equalizer fork to a cone on the difference of the two morphisms. -/
def kernel_fork_of_fork (c : fork f g) : kernel_fork (f - g) :=
fork.of_ι c.ι $ by rw [comp_sub, comp_zero, sub_eq_zero, c.condition]
@[simp] lemma kernel_fork_of_fork_ι (c : fork f g) : (kernel_fork_of_fork c).ι = c.ι := rfl
@[simp] lemma kernel_fork_of_fork_of_ι {P : C} (ι : P ⟶ X) (w : ι ≫ f = ι ≫ g) :
(kernel_fork_of_fork (fork.of_ι ι w)) = kernel_fork.of_ι ι (by simp [w]) := rfl
/-- A kernel of `f - g` is an equalizer of `f` and `g`. -/
def is_limit_fork_of_kernel_fork {c : kernel_fork (f - g)} (i : is_limit c) :
is_limit (fork_of_kernel_fork c) :=
fork.is_limit.mk' _ $ λ s,
⟨i.lift (kernel_fork_of_fork s), i.fac _ _,
λ m h, by apply fork.is_limit.hom_ext i; tidy⟩
@[simp]
lemma is_limit_fork_of_kernel_fork_lift {c : kernel_fork (f - g)} (i : is_limit c) (s : fork f g) :
(is_limit_fork_of_kernel_fork i).lift s = i.lift (kernel_fork_of_fork s) := rfl
/-- An equalizer of `f` and `g` is a kernel of `f - g`. -/
def is_limit_kernel_fork_of_fork {c : fork f g} (i : is_limit c) :
is_limit (kernel_fork_of_fork c) :=
fork.is_limit.mk' _ $ λ s,
⟨i.lift (fork_of_kernel_fork s), i.fac _ _,
λ m h, by apply fork.is_limit.hom_ext i; tidy⟩
variables (f g)
/-- A preadditive category has an equalizer for `f` and `g` if it has a kernel for `f - g`. -/
lemma has_equalizer_of_has_kernel [has_kernel (f - g)] : has_equalizer f g :=
has_limit.mk { cone := fork_of_kernel_fork _,
is_limit := is_limit_fork_of_kernel_fork (equalizer_is_equalizer (f - g) 0) }
/-- A preadditive category has a kernel for `f - g` if it has an equalizer for `f` and `g`. -/
lemma has_kernel_of_has_equalizer [has_equalizer f g] : has_kernel (f - g) :=
has_limit.mk { cone := kernel_fork_of_fork (equalizer.fork f g),
is_limit := is_limit_kernel_fork_of_fork (limit.is_limit (parallel_pair f g)) }
variables {f g}
/-- Map a cokernel cocone on the difference of two morphisms to the coequalizer cofork. -/
def cofork_of_cokernel_cofork (c : cokernel_cofork (f - g)) : cofork f g :=
cofork.of_π c.π $ by rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← sub_comp, c.condition]
/-- Map any coequalizer cofork to a cocone on the difference of the two morphisms. -/
def cokernel_cofork_of_cofork (c : cofork f g) : cokernel_cofork (f - g) :=
cofork.of_π c.π $ by rw [sub_comp, zero_comp, sub_eq_zero, c.condition]
@[simp] lemma cokernel_cofork_of_cofork_π (c : cofork f g) :
(cokernel_cofork_of_cofork c).π = c.π := rfl
@[simp] lemma cokernel_cofork_of_cofork_of_π {P : C} (π : Y ⟶ P) (w : f ≫ π = g ≫ π) :
(cokernel_cofork_of_cofork (cofork.of_π π w)) = cokernel_cofork.of_π π (by simp [w]) := rfl
/-- A cokernel of `f - g` is a coequalizer of `f` and `g`. -/
def is_colimit_cofork_of_cokernel_cofork {c : cokernel_cofork (f - g)} (i : is_colimit c) :
is_colimit (cofork_of_cokernel_cofork c) :=
cofork.is_colimit.mk' _ $ λ s,
⟨i.desc (cokernel_cofork_of_cofork s), i.fac _ _,
λ m h, by apply cofork.is_colimit.hom_ext i; tidy⟩
@[simp]
lemma is_colimit_cofork_of_cokernel_cofork_desc {c : cokernel_cofork (f - g)}
(i : is_colimit c) (s : cofork f g) :
(is_colimit_cofork_of_cokernel_cofork i).desc s = i.desc (cokernel_cofork_of_cofork s) := rfl
/-- A coequalizer of `f` and `g` is a cokernel of `f - g`. -/
def is_colimit_cokernel_cofork_of_cofork {c : cofork f g} (i : is_colimit c) :
is_colimit (cokernel_cofork_of_cofork c) :=
cofork.is_colimit.mk' _ $ λ s,
⟨i.desc (cofork_of_cokernel_cofork s), i.fac _ _,
λ m h, by apply cofork.is_colimit.hom_ext i; tidy⟩
variables (f g)
/-- A preadditive category has a coequalizer for `f` and `g` if it has a cokernel for `f - g`. -/
lemma has_coequalizer_of_has_cokernel [has_cokernel (f - g)] : has_coequalizer f g :=
has_colimit.mk { cocone := cofork_of_cokernel_cofork _,
is_colimit := is_colimit_cofork_of_cokernel_cofork (coequalizer_is_coequalizer (f - g) 0) }
/-- A preadditive category has a cokernel for `f - g` if it has a coequalizer for `f` and `g`. -/
lemma has_cokernel_of_has_coequalizer [has_coequalizer f g] : has_cokernel (f - g) :=
has_colimit.mk { cocone := cokernel_cofork_of_cofork (coequalizer.cofork f g),
is_colimit := is_colimit_cokernel_cofork_of_cofork (colimit.is_colimit (parallel_pair f g)) }
end
/-- If a preadditive category has all kernels, then it also has all equalizers. -/
lemma has_equalizers_of_has_kernels [has_kernels C] : has_equalizers C :=
@has_equalizers_of_has_limit_parallel_pair _ _ (λ _ _ f g, has_equalizer_of_has_kernel f g)
/-- If a preadditive category has all cokernels, then it also has all coequalizers. -/
lemma has_coequalizers_of_has_cokernels [has_cokernels C] : has_coequalizers C :=
@has_coequalizers_of_has_colimit_parallel_pair _ _ (λ _ _ f g, has_coequalizer_of_has_cokernel f g)
end equalizers
end preadditive
end category_theory
|
159badc638a7b0014d0ad83063b78f8449f8283a | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/measure_theory/decomposition/lebesgue.lean | b6c8c243b82d2c915014354464d75f019efb4221 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 63,440 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import measure_theory.measure.complex
import measure_theory.measure.sub
import measure_theory.decomposition.jordan
import measure_theory.measure.with_density_vector_measure
import measure_theory.function.ae_eq_of_integral
/-!
# Lebesgue decomposition
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
This file proves the Lebesgue decomposition theorem. The Lebesgue decomposition theorem states that,
given two σ-finite measures `μ` and `ν`, there exists a σ-finite measure `ξ` and a measurable
function `f` such that `μ = ξ + fν` and `ξ` is mutually singular with respect to `ν`.
The Lebesgue decomposition provides the Radon-Nikodym theorem readily.
## Main definitions
* `measure_theory.measure.have_lebesgue_decomposition` : A pair of measures `μ` and `ν` is said
to `have_lebesgue_decomposition` if there exist a measure `ξ` and a measurable function `f`,
such that `ξ` is mutually singular with respect to `ν` and `μ = ξ + ν.with_density f`
* `measure_theory.measure.singular_part` : If a pair of measures `have_lebesgue_decomposition`,
then `singular_part` chooses the measure from `have_lebesgue_decomposition`, otherwise it
returns the zero measure.
* `measure_theory.measure.rn_deriv`: If a pair of measures
`have_lebesgue_decomposition`, then `rn_deriv` chooses the measurable function from
`have_lebesgue_decomposition`, otherwise it returns the zero function.
* `measure_theory.signed_measure.have_lebesgue_decomposition` : A signed measure `s` and a
measure `μ` is said to `have_lebesgue_decomposition` if both the positive part and negative
part of `s` `have_lebesgue_decomposition` with respect to `μ`.
* `measure_theory.signed_measure.singular_part` : The singular part between a signed measure `s`
and a measure `μ` is simply the singular part of the positive part of `s` with respect to `μ`
minus the singular part of the negative part of `s` with respect to `μ`.
* `measure_theory.signed_measure.rn_deriv` : The Radon-Nikodym derivative of a signed
measure `s` with respect to a measure `μ` is the Radon-Nikodym derivative of the positive part of
`s` with respect to `μ` minus the Radon-Nikodym derivative of the negative part of `s` with
respect to `μ`.
## Main results
* `measure_theory.measure.have_lebesgue_decomposition_of_sigma_finite` :
the Lebesgue decomposition theorem.
* `measure_theory.measure.eq_singular_part` : Given measures `μ` and `ν`, if `s` is a measure
mutually singular to `ν` and `f` is a measurable function such that `μ = s + fν`, then
`s = μ.singular_part ν`.
* `measure_theory.measure.eq_rn_deriv` : Given measures `μ` and `ν`, if `s` is a
measure mutually singular to `ν` and `f` is a measurable function such that `μ = s + fν`,
then `f = μ.rn_deriv ν`.
* `measure_theory.signed_measure.singular_part_add_with_density_rn_deriv_eq` :
the Lebesgue decomposition theorem between a signed measure and a σ-finite positive measure.
# Tags
Lebesgue decomposition theorem
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical measure_theory nnreal ennreal
open set
variables {α β : Type*} {m : measurable_space α} {μ ν : measure_theory.measure α}
include m
namespace measure_theory
namespace measure
/-- A pair of measures `μ` and `ν` is said to `have_lebesgue_decomposition` if there exists a
measure `ξ` and a measurable function `f`, such that `ξ` is mutually singular with respect to
`ν` and `μ = ξ + ν.with_density f`. -/
class have_lebesgue_decomposition (μ ν : measure α) : Prop :=
(lebesgue_decomposition :
∃ (p : measure α × (α → ℝ≥0∞)), measurable p.2 ∧ p.1 ⟂ₘ ν ∧ μ = p.1 + ν.with_density p.2)
/-- If a pair of measures `have_lebesgue_decomposition`, then `singular_part` chooses the
measure from `have_lebesgue_decomposition`, otherwise it returns the zero measure. For sigma-finite
measures, `μ = μ.singular_part ν + ν.with_density (μ.rn_deriv ν)`. -/
@[irreducible]
def singular_part (μ ν : measure α) : measure α :=
if h : have_lebesgue_decomposition μ ν then (classical.some h.lebesgue_decomposition).1 else 0
/-- If a pair of measures `have_lebesgue_decomposition`, then `rn_deriv` chooses the
measurable function from `have_lebesgue_decomposition`, otherwise it returns the zero function.
For sigma-finite measures, `μ = μ.singular_part ν + ν.with_density (μ.rn_deriv ν)`.-/
@[irreducible]
def rn_deriv (μ ν : measure α) : α → ℝ≥0∞ :=
if h : have_lebesgue_decomposition μ ν then (classical.some h.lebesgue_decomposition).2 else 0
lemma have_lebesgue_decomposition_spec (μ ν : measure α)
[h : have_lebesgue_decomposition μ ν] :
measurable (μ.rn_deriv ν) ∧ (μ.singular_part ν) ⟂ₘ ν ∧
μ = (μ.singular_part ν) + ν.with_density (μ.rn_deriv ν) :=
begin
rw [singular_part, rn_deriv, dif_pos h, dif_pos h],
exact classical.some_spec h.lebesgue_decomposition,
end
lemma have_lebesgue_decomposition_add (μ ν : measure α)
[have_lebesgue_decomposition μ ν] :
μ = (μ.singular_part ν) + ν.with_density (μ.rn_deriv ν) :=
(have_lebesgue_decomposition_spec μ ν).2.2
instance have_lebesgue_decomposition_smul
(μ ν : measure α) [have_lebesgue_decomposition μ ν] (r : ℝ≥0) :
(r • μ).have_lebesgue_decomposition ν :=
{ lebesgue_decomposition :=
begin
obtain ⟨hmeas, hsing, hadd⟩ := have_lebesgue_decomposition_spec μ ν,
refine ⟨⟨r • μ.singular_part ν, r • μ.rn_deriv ν⟩, _, hsing.smul _, _⟩,
{ change measurable ((r : ℝ≥0∞) • _), -- cannot remove this line
exact hmeas.const_smul _ },
{ change _ = (r : ℝ≥0∞) • _ + ν.with_density ((r : ℝ≥0∞) • _),
rw [with_density_smul _ hmeas, ← smul_add, ← hadd],
refl }
end }
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_rn_deriv (μ ν : measure α) :
measurable $ μ.rn_deriv ν :=
begin
by_cases h : have_lebesgue_decomposition μ ν,
{ exactI (have_lebesgue_decomposition_spec μ ν).1 },
{ rw [rn_deriv, dif_neg h],
exact measurable_zero }
end
lemma mutually_singular_singular_part (μ ν : measure α) :
μ.singular_part ν ⟂ₘ ν :=
begin
by_cases h : have_lebesgue_decomposition μ ν,
{ exactI (have_lebesgue_decomposition_spec μ ν).2.1 },
{ rw [singular_part, dif_neg h],
exact mutually_singular.zero_left }
end
lemma singular_part_le (μ ν : measure α) : μ.singular_part ν ≤ μ :=
begin
by_cases hl : have_lebesgue_decomposition μ ν,
{ casesI (have_lebesgue_decomposition_spec μ ν).2 with _ h,
conv_rhs { rw h },
exact measure.le_add_right le_rfl },
{ rw [singular_part, dif_neg hl],
exact measure.zero_le μ }
end
lemma with_density_rn_deriv_le (μ ν : measure α) :
ν.with_density (μ.rn_deriv ν) ≤ μ :=
begin
by_cases hl : have_lebesgue_decomposition μ ν,
{ casesI (have_lebesgue_decomposition_spec μ ν).2 with _ h,
conv_rhs { rw h },
exact measure.le_add_left le_rfl },
{ rw [rn_deriv, dif_neg hl, with_density_zero],
exact measure.zero_le μ }
end
instance [is_finite_measure μ] : is_finite_measure (μ.singular_part ν) :=
is_finite_measure_of_le μ $ singular_part_le μ ν
instance [sigma_finite μ] : sigma_finite (μ.singular_part ν) :=
sigma_finite_of_le μ $ singular_part_le μ ν
instance [topological_space α] [is_locally_finite_measure μ] :
is_locally_finite_measure (μ.singular_part ν) :=
is_locally_finite_measure_of_le $ singular_part_le μ ν
instance [is_finite_measure μ] : is_finite_measure (ν.with_density $ μ.rn_deriv ν) :=
is_finite_measure_of_le μ $ with_density_rn_deriv_le μ ν
instance [sigma_finite μ] : sigma_finite (ν.with_density $ μ.rn_deriv ν) :=
sigma_finite_of_le μ $ with_density_rn_deriv_le μ ν
instance [topological_space α] [is_locally_finite_measure μ] :
is_locally_finite_measure (ν.with_density $ μ.rn_deriv ν) :=
is_locally_finite_measure_of_le $ with_density_rn_deriv_le μ ν
lemma lintegral_rn_deriv_lt_top_of_measure_ne_top
{μ : measure α} (ν : measure α) {s : set α} (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ x in s, μ.rn_deriv ν x ∂ν < ∞ :=
begin
by_cases hl : have_lebesgue_decomposition μ ν,
{ haveI := hl,
obtain ⟨-, -, hadd⟩ := have_lebesgue_decomposition_spec μ ν,
suffices : ∫⁻ x in to_measurable μ s, μ.rn_deriv ν x ∂ν < ∞,
from lt_of_le_of_lt (lintegral_mono_set (subset_to_measurable _ _)) this,
rw [← with_density_apply _ (measurable_set_to_measurable _ _)],
refine lt_of_le_of_lt
(le_add_left le_rfl : _ ≤ μ.singular_part ν (to_measurable μ s) +
ν.with_density (μ.rn_deriv ν) (to_measurable μ s)) _,
rw [← measure.add_apply, ← hadd, measure_to_measurable],
exact hs.lt_top },
{ erw [measure.rn_deriv, dif_neg hl, lintegral_zero],
exact with_top.zero_lt_top },
end
lemma lintegral_rn_deriv_lt_top
(μ ν : measure α) [is_finite_measure μ] :
∫⁻ x, μ.rn_deriv ν x ∂ν < ∞ :=
begin
rw [← set_lintegral_univ],
exact lintegral_rn_deriv_lt_top_of_measure_ne_top _ (measure_lt_top _ _).ne,
end
/-- The Radon-Nikodym derivative of a sigma-finite measure `μ` with respect to another
measure `ν` is `ν`-almost everywhere finite. -/
theorem rn_deriv_lt_top (μ ν : measure α) [sigma_finite μ] :
∀ᵐ x ∂ν, μ.rn_deriv ν x < ∞ :=
begin
suffices : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ x ∂ν, x ∈ spanning_sets μ n → μ.rn_deriv ν x < ∞,
{ filter_upwards [ae_all_iff.2 this] with _ hx using hx _ (mem_spanning_sets_index _ _), },
assume n,
rw ← ae_restrict_iff' (measurable_spanning_sets _ _),
apply ae_lt_top (measurable_rn_deriv _ _),
refine (lintegral_rn_deriv_lt_top_of_measure_ne_top _ _).ne,
exact (measure_spanning_sets_lt_top _ _).ne
end
/-- Given measures `μ` and `ν`, if `s` is a measure mutually singular to `ν` and `f` is a
measurable function such that `μ = s + fν`, then `s = μ.singular_part μ`.
This theorem provides the uniqueness of the `singular_part` in the Lebesgue decomposition theorem,
while `measure_theory.measure.eq_rn_deriv` provides the uniqueness of the
`rn_deriv`. -/
theorem eq_singular_part {s : measure α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : measurable f)
(hs : s ⟂ₘ ν) (hadd : μ = s + ν.with_density f) :
s = μ.singular_part ν :=
begin
haveI : have_lebesgue_decomposition μ ν := ⟨⟨⟨s, f⟩, hf, hs, hadd⟩⟩,
obtain ⟨hmeas, hsing, hadd'⟩ := have_lebesgue_decomposition_spec μ ν,
obtain ⟨⟨S, hS₁, hS₂, hS₃⟩, ⟨T, hT₁, hT₂, hT₃⟩⟩ := ⟨hs, hsing⟩,
rw hadd' at hadd,
have hνinter : ν (S ∩ T)ᶜ = 0,
{ rw compl_inter,
refine nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 (le_trans (measure_union_le _ _) _),
rw [hT₃, hS₃, add_zero],
exact le_rfl },
have heq : s.restrict (S ∩ T)ᶜ = (μ.singular_part ν).restrict (S ∩ T)ᶜ,
{ ext1 A hA,
have hf : ν.with_density f (A ∩ (S ∩ T)ᶜ) = 0,
{ refine with_density_absolutely_continuous ν _ _,
rw ← nonpos_iff_eq_zero,
exact hνinter ▸ measure_mono (inter_subset_right _ _) },
have hrn : ν.with_density (μ.rn_deriv ν) (A ∩ (S ∩ T)ᶜ) = 0,
{ refine with_density_absolutely_continuous ν _ _,
rw ← nonpos_iff_eq_zero,
exact hνinter ▸ measure_mono (inter_subset_right _ _) },
rw [restrict_apply hA, restrict_apply hA, ← add_zero (s (A ∩ (S ∩ T)ᶜ)), ← hf,
← add_apply, ← hadd, add_apply, hrn, add_zero] },
have heq' : ∀ A : set α, measurable_set A → s A = s.restrict (S ∩ T)ᶜ A,
{ intros A hA,
have hsinter : s (A ∩ (S ∩ T)) = 0,
{ rw ← nonpos_iff_eq_zero,
exact hS₂ ▸ measure_mono ((inter_subset_right _ _).trans (inter_subset_left _ _)) },
rw [restrict_apply hA, ← diff_eq, ae_disjoint.measure_diff_left hsinter] },
ext1 A hA,
have hμinter : μ.singular_part ν (A ∩ (S ∩ T)) = 0,
{ rw ← nonpos_iff_eq_zero,
exact hT₂ ▸ measure_mono ((inter_subset_right _ _).trans (inter_subset_right _ _)) },
rw [heq' A hA, heq, restrict_apply hA, ← diff_eq, ae_disjoint.measure_diff_left hμinter]
end
lemma singular_part_zero (ν : measure α) : (0 : measure α).singular_part ν = 0 :=
begin
refine (eq_singular_part measurable_zero mutually_singular.zero_left _).symm,
rw [zero_add, with_density_zero],
end
lemma singular_part_smul (μ ν : measure α) (r : ℝ≥0) :
(r • μ).singular_part ν = r • (μ.singular_part ν) :=
begin
by_cases hr : r = 0,
{ rw [hr, zero_smul, zero_smul, singular_part_zero] },
by_cases hl : have_lebesgue_decomposition μ ν,
{ haveI := hl,
refine (eq_singular_part ((measurable_rn_deriv μ ν).const_smul (r : ℝ≥0∞))
(mutually_singular.smul r (have_lebesgue_decomposition_spec _ _).2.1) _).symm,
rw [with_density_smul _ (measurable_rn_deriv _ _), ← smul_add,
← have_lebesgue_decomposition_add μ ν, ennreal.smul_def] },
{ rw [singular_part, singular_part, dif_neg hl, dif_neg, smul_zero],
refine λ hl', hl _,
rw ← inv_smul_smul₀ hr μ,
exact @measure.have_lebesgue_decomposition_smul _ _ _ _ hl' _ }
end
lemma singular_part_add (μ₁ μ₂ ν : measure α)
[have_lebesgue_decomposition μ₁ ν] [have_lebesgue_decomposition μ₂ ν] :
(μ₁ + μ₂).singular_part ν = μ₁.singular_part ν + μ₂.singular_part ν :=
begin
refine (eq_singular_part
((measurable_rn_deriv μ₁ ν).add (measurable_rn_deriv μ₂ ν))
((have_lebesgue_decomposition_spec _ _).2.1.add_left (have_lebesgue_decomposition_spec _ _).2.1)
_).symm,
erw with_density_add_left (measurable_rn_deriv μ₁ ν),
conv_rhs { rw [add_assoc, add_comm (μ₂.singular_part ν), ← add_assoc, ← add_assoc] },
rw [← have_lebesgue_decomposition_add μ₁ ν, add_assoc,
add_comm (ν.with_density (μ₂.rn_deriv ν)),
← have_lebesgue_decomposition_add μ₂ ν]
end
lemma singular_part_with_density (ν : measure α) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : measurable f) :
(ν.with_density f).singular_part ν = 0 :=
begin
have : ν.with_density f = 0 + ν.with_density f, by rw zero_add,
exact (eq_singular_part hf mutually_singular.zero_left this).symm,
end
/-- Given measures `μ` and `ν`, if `s` is a measure mutually singular to `ν` and `f` is a
measurable function such that `μ = s + fν`, then `f = μ.rn_deriv ν`.
This theorem provides the uniqueness of the `rn_deriv` in the Lebesgue decomposition
theorem, while `measure_theory.measure.eq_singular_part` provides the uniqueness of the
`singular_part`. Here, the uniqueness is given in terms of the measures, while the uniqueness in
terms of the functions is given in `eq_rn_deriv`. -/
theorem eq_with_density_rn_deriv {s : measure α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : measurable f)
(hs : s ⟂ₘ ν) (hadd : μ = s + ν.with_density f) :
ν.with_density f = ν.with_density (μ.rn_deriv ν) :=
begin
haveI : have_lebesgue_decomposition μ ν := ⟨⟨⟨s, f⟩, hf, hs, hadd⟩⟩,
obtain ⟨hmeas, hsing, hadd'⟩ := have_lebesgue_decomposition_spec μ ν,
obtain ⟨⟨S, hS₁, hS₂, hS₃⟩, ⟨T, hT₁, hT₂, hT₃⟩⟩ := ⟨hs, hsing⟩,
rw hadd' at hadd,
have hνinter : ν (S ∩ T)ᶜ = 0,
{ rw compl_inter,
refine nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 (le_trans (measure_union_le _ _) _),
rw [hT₃, hS₃, add_zero],
exact le_rfl },
have heq : (ν.with_density f).restrict (S ∩ T) =
(ν.with_density (μ.rn_deriv ν)).restrict (S ∩ T),
{ ext1 A hA,
have hs : s (A ∩ (S ∩ T)) = 0,
{ rw ← nonpos_iff_eq_zero,
exact hS₂ ▸ measure_mono ((inter_subset_right _ _).trans (inter_subset_left _ _)) },
have hsing : μ.singular_part ν (A ∩ (S ∩ T)) = 0,
{ rw ← nonpos_iff_eq_zero,
exact hT₂ ▸ measure_mono
((inter_subset_right _ _).trans (inter_subset_right _ _)) },
rw [restrict_apply hA, restrict_apply hA, ← add_zero (ν.with_density f (A ∩ (S ∩ T))),
← hs, ← add_apply, add_comm, ← hadd, add_apply, hsing, zero_add] },
have heq' : ∀ A : set α, measurable_set A →
ν.with_density f A = (ν.with_density f).restrict (S ∩ T) A,
{ intros A hA,
have hνfinter : ν.with_density f (A ∩ (S ∩ T)ᶜ) = 0,
{ rw ← nonpos_iff_eq_zero,
exact with_density_absolutely_continuous ν f hνinter ▸
measure_mono (inter_subset_right _ _) },
rw [restrict_apply hA, ← add_zero (ν.with_density f (A ∩ (S ∩ T))), ← hνfinter,
← diff_eq, measure_inter_add_diff _ (hS₁.inter hT₁)] },
ext1 A hA,
have hνrn : ν.with_density (μ.rn_deriv ν) (A ∩ (S ∩ T)ᶜ) = 0,
{ rw ← nonpos_iff_eq_zero,
exact with_density_absolutely_continuous ν (μ.rn_deriv ν) hνinter ▸
measure_mono (inter_subset_right _ _) },
rw [heq' A hA, heq, ← add_zero ((ν.with_density (μ.rn_deriv ν)).restrict (S ∩ T) A),
← hνrn, restrict_apply hA, ← diff_eq, measure_inter_add_diff _ (hS₁.inter hT₁)]
end
/-- Given measures `μ` and `ν`, if `s` is a measure mutually singular to `ν` and `f` is a
measurable function such that `μ = s + fν`, then `f = μ.rn_deriv ν`.
This theorem provides the uniqueness of the `rn_deriv` in the Lebesgue decomposition
theorem, while `measure_theory.measure.eq_singular_part` provides the uniqueness of the
`singular_part`. Here, the uniqueness is given in terms of the functions, while the uniqueness in
terms of the functions is given in `eq_with_density_rn_deriv`. -/
theorem eq_rn_deriv [sigma_finite ν] {s : measure α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : measurable f)
(hs : s ⟂ₘ ν) (hadd : μ = s + ν.with_density f) :
f =ᵐ[ν] μ.rn_deriv ν :=
begin
refine ae_eq_of_forall_set_lintegral_eq_of_sigma_finite hf (measurable_rn_deriv μ ν) _,
assume a ha h'a,
calc ∫⁻ (x : α) in a, f x ∂ν = ν.with_density f a : (with_density_apply f ha).symm
... = ν.with_density (μ.rn_deriv ν) a : by rw eq_with_density_rn_deriv hf hs hadd
... = ∫⁻ (x : α) in a, μ.rn_deriv ν x ∂ν : with_density_apply _ ha
end
/-- The Radon-Nikodym derivative of `f ν` with respect to `ν` is `f`. -/
theorem rn_deriv_with_density (ν : measure α) [sigma_finite ν] {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : measurable f) :
(ν.with_density f).rn_deriv ν =ᵐ[ν] f :=
begin
have : ν.with_density f = 0 + ν.with_density f, by rw zero_add,
exact (eq_rn_deriv hf mutually_singular.zero_left this).symm,
end
/-- The Radon-Nikodym derivative of the restriction of a measure to a measurable set is the
indicator function of this set. -/
theorem rn_deriv_restrict (ν : measure α) [sigma_finite ν] {s : set α} (hs : measurable_set s) :
(ν.restrict s).rn_deriv ν =ᵐ[ν] s.indicator 1 :=
begin
rw ← with_density_indicator_one hs,
exact rn_deriv_with_density _ (measurable_one.indicator hs)
end
open vector_measure signed_measure
/-- If two finite measures `μ` and `ν` are not mutually singular, there exists some `ε > 0` and
a measurable set `E`, such that `ν(E) > 0` and `E` is positive with respect to `μ - εν`.
This lemma is useful for the Lebesgue decomposition theorem. -/
lemma exists_positive_of_not_mutually_singular
(μ ν : measure α) [is_finite_measure μ] [is_finite_measure ν] (h : ¬ μ ⟂ₘ ν) :
∃ ε : ℝ≥0, 0 < ε ∧ ∃ E : set α, measurable_set E ∧ 0 < ν E ∧
0 ≤[E] μ.to_signed_measure - (ε • ν).to_signed_measure :=
begin
-- for all `n : ℕ`, obtain the Hahn decomposition for `μ - (1 / n) ν`
have : ∀ n : ℕ, ∃ i : set α, measurable_set i ∧
0 ≤[i] (μ.to_signed_measure - ((1 / (n + 1) : ℝ≥0) • ν).to_signed_measure) ∧
(μ.to_signed_measure - ((1 / (n + 1) : ℝ≥0) • ν).to_signed_measure) ≤[iᶜ] 0,
{ intro, exact exists_compl_positive_negative _ },
choose f hf₁ hf₂ hf₃ using this,
-- set `A` to be the intersection of all the negative parts of obtained Hahn decompositions
-- and we show that `μ A = 0`
set A := ⋂ n, (f n)ᶜ with hA₁,
have hAmeas : measurable_set A,
{ exact measurable_set.Inter (λ n, (hf₁ n).compl) },
have hA₂ : ∀ n : ℕ, (μ.to_signed_measure - ((1 / (n + 1) : ℝ≥0) • ν).to_signed_measure) ≤[A] 0,
{ intro n, exact restrict_le_restrict_subset _ _ (hf₁ n).compl (hf₃ n) (Inter_subset _ _) },
have hA₃ : ∀ n : ℕ, μ A ≤ (1 / (n + 1) : ℝ≥0) * ν A,
{ intro n,
have := nonpos_of_restrict_le_zero _ (hA₂ n),
rwa [to_signed_measure_sub_apply hAmeas, sub_nonpos, ennreal.to_real_le_to_real] at this,
exacts [ne_of_lt (measure_lt_top _ _), ne_of_lt (measure_lt_top _ _)] },
have hμ : μ A = 0,
{ lift μ A to ℝ≥0 using ne_of_lt (measure_lt_top _ _) with μA,
lift ν A to ℝ≥0 using ne_of_lt (measure_lt_top _ _) with νA,
rw ennreal.coe_eq_zero,
by_cases hb : 0 < νA,
{ suffices : ∀ b, 0 < b → μA ≤ b,
{ by_contra,
have h' := this (μA / 2) (half_pos (zero_lt_iff.2 h)),
rw ← @not_not (μA ≤ μA / 2) at h',
exact h' (not_le.2 (nnreal.half_lt_self h)) },
intros c hc,
have : ∃ n : ℕ, 1 / (n + 1 : ℝ) < c * νA⁻¹, refine exists_nat_one_div_lt _,
{ refine mul_pos hc _,
rw _root_.inv_pos, exact hb },
rcases this with ⟨n, hn⟩,
have hb₁ : (0 : ℝ) < νA⁻¹, { rw _root_.inv_pos, exact hb },
have h' : 1 / (↑n + 1) * νA < c,
{ rw [← nnreal.coe_lt_coe, ← mul_lt_mul_right hb₁, nnreal.coe_mul, mul_assoc,
← nnreal.coe_inv, ← nnreal.coe_mul, _root_.mul_inv_cancel, ← nnreal.coe_mul,
mul_one, nnreal.coe_inv],
{ exact hn },
{ exact ne.symm (ne_of_lt hb) } },
refine le_trans _ (le_of_lt h'),
rw [← ennreal.coe_le_coe, ennreal.coe_mul],
exact hA₃ n },
{ rw [not_lt, le_zero_iff] at hb,
specialize hA₃ 0,
simp [hb, le_zero_iff] at hA₃,
assumption } },
-- since `μ` and `ν` are not mutually singular, `μ A = 0` implies `ν Aᶜ > 0`
rw mutually_singular at h, push_neg at h,
have := h _ hAmeas hμ,
simp_rw [hA₁, compl_Inter, compl_compl] at this,
-- as `Aᶜ = ⋃ n, f n`, `ν Aᶜ > 0` implies there exists some `n` such that `ν (f n) > 0`
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_measure_pos_of_not_measure_Union_null this,
-- thus, choosing `f n` as the set `E` suffices
exact ⟨1 / (n + 1), by simp, f n, hf₁ n, hn, hf₂ n⟩,
end
namespace lebesgue_decomposition
/-- Given two measures `μ` and `ν`, `measurable_le μ ν` is the set of measurable
functions `f`, such that, for all measurable sets `A`, `∫⁻ x in A, f x ∂μ ≤ ν A`.
This is useful for the Lebesgue decomposition theorem. -/
def measurable_le (μ ν : measure α) : set (α → ℝ≥0∞) :=
{ f | measurable f ∧ ∀ (A : set α) (hA : measurable_set A), ∫⁻ x in A, f x ∂μ ≤ ν A }
lemma zero_mem_measurable_le : (0 : α → ℝ≥0∞) ∈ measurable_le μ ν :=
⟨measurable_zero, λ A hA, by simp⟩
lemma sup_mem_measurable_le {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : f ∈ measurable_le μ ν) (hg : g ∈ measurable_le μ ν) :
(λ a, f a ⊔ g a) ∈ measurable_le μ ν :=
begin
simp_rw ennreal.sup_eq_max,
refine ⟨measurable.max hf.1 hg.1, λ A hA, _⟩,
have h₁ := hA.inter (measurable_set_le hf.1 hg.1),
have h₂ := hA.inter (measurable_set_lt hg.1 hf.1),
rw [set_lintegral_max hf.1 hg.1],
refine (add_le_add (hg.2 _ h₁) (hf.2 _ h₂)).trans_eq _,
{ simp only [← not_le, ← compl_set_of, ← diff_eq],
exact measure_inter_add_diff _ (measurable_set_le hf.1 hg.1) }
end
lemma supr_succ_eq_sup {α} (f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞) (m : ℕ) (a : α) :
(⨆ (k : ℕ) (hk : k ≤ m + 1), f k a) = f m.succ a ⊔ ⨆ (k : ℕ) (hk : k ≤ m), f k a :=
begin
ext x,
simp only [option.mem_def, ennreal.some_eq_coe],
split; intro h; rw ← h, symmetry,
all_goals
{ set c := (⨆ (k : ℕ) (hk : k ≤ m + 1), f k a) with hc,
set d := (f m.succ a ⊔ ⨆ (k : ℕ) (hk : k ≤ m), f k a) with hd,
rw [@le_antisymm_iff ℝ≥0∞, hc, hd], -- Specifying the type is weirdly necessary
refine ⟨_, _⟩,
{ refine supr₂_le (λ n hn, _),
rcases nat.of_le_succ hn with (h | h),
{ exact le_sup_of_le_right (le_supr₂ n h) },
{ exact h ▸ le_sup_left } },
{ refine sup_le _ (bsupr_mono $ λ n hn, hn.trans m.le_succ),
convert @le_supr₂ _ _ (λ i, i ≤ m + 1) _ _ m.succ le_rfl,
refl } }
end
lemma supr_mem_measurable_le
(f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : ∀ n, f n ∈ measurable_le μ ν) (n : ℕ) :
(λ x, ⨆ k (hk : k ≤ n), f k x) ∈ measurable_le μ ν :=
begin
induction n with m hm,
{ refine ⟨_, _⟩,
{ simp [(hf 0).1] },
{ intros A hA, simp [(hf 0).2 A hA] } },
{ have : (λ (a : α), ⨆ (k : ℕ) (hk : k ≤ m + 1), f k a) =
(λ a, f m.succ a ⊔ ⨆ (k : ℕ) (hk : k ≤ m), f k a),
{ exact funext (λ _, supr_succ_eq_sup _ _ _) },
refine ⟨measurable_supr (λ n, measurable.supr_Prop _ (hf n).1), λ A hA, _⟩,
rw this, exact (sup_mem_measurable_le (hf m.succ) hm).2 A hA }
end
lemma supr_mem_measurable_le'
(f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : ∀ n, f n ∈ measurable_le μ ν) (n : ℕ) :
(⨆ k (hk : k ≤ n), f k) ∈ measurable_le μ ν :=
begin
convert supr_mem_measurable_le f hf n,
ext, simp
end
section supr_lemmas --TODO: these statements should be moved elsewhere
omit m
lemma supr_monotone {α : Type*} (f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
monotone (λ n x, ⨆ k (hk : k ≤ n), f k x) :=
λ n m hnm x, bsupr_mono $ λ i, ge_trans hnm
lemma supr_monotone' {α : Type*} (f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞) (x : α) :
monotone (λ n, ⨆ k (hk : k ≤ n), f k x) :=
λ n m hnm, supr_monotone f hnm x
lemma supr_le_le {α : Type*} (f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞) (n k : ℕ) (hk : k ≤ n) :
f k ≤ λ x, ⨆ k (hk : k ≤ n), f k x :=
λ x, le_supr₂ k hk
end supr_lemmas
/-- `measurable_le_eval μ ν` is the set of `∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ` for all `f ∈ measurable_le μ ν`. -/
def measurable_le_eval (μ ν : measure α) : set ℝ≥0∞ :=
(λ f : α → ℝ≥0∞, ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) '' measurable_le μ ν
end lebesgue_decomposition
open lebesgue_decomposition
/-- Any pair of finite measures `μ` and `ν`, `have_lebesgue_decomposition`. That is to say,
there exist a measure `ξ` and a measurable function `f`, such that `ξ` is mutually singular
with respect to `ν` and `μ = ξ + ν.with_density f`.
This is not an instance since this is also shown for the more general σ-finite measures with
`measure_theory.measure.have_lebesgue_decomposition_of_sigma_finite`. -/
theorem have_lebesgue_decomposition_of_finite_measure [is_finite_measure μ] [is_finite_measure ν] :
have_lebesgue_decomposition μ ν :=
⟨begin
have h := @exists_seq_tendsto_Sup _ _ _ _ _ (measurable_le_eval ν μ)
⟨0, 0, zero_mem_measurable_le, by simp⟩ (order_top.bdd_above _),
choose g hmono hg₂ f hf₁ hf₂ using h,
-- we set `ξ` to be the supremum of an increasing sequence of functions obtained from above
set ξ := ⨆ n k (hk : k ≤ n), f k with hξ,
-- we see that `ξ` has the largest integral among all functions in `measurable_le`
have hξ₁ : Sup (measurable_le_eval ν μ) = ∫⁻ a, ξ a ∂ν,
{ have := @lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone _ _ ν
(λ n, ⨆ k (hk : k ≤ n), f k) (⨆ n k (hk : k ≤ n), f k) _ _ _,
{ refine tendsto_nhds_unique _ this,
refine tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le hg₂ tendsto_const_nhds _ _,
{ intro n, rw ← hf₂ n,
apply lintegral_mono,
simp only [supr_apply, supr_le_le f n n le_rfl] },
{ intro n,
exact le_Sup ⟨⨆ (k : ℕ) (hk : k ≤ n), f k, supr_mem_measurable_le' _ hf₁ _, rfl⟩ } },
{ intro n,
refine measurable.ae_measurable _,
convert (supr_mem_measurable_le _ hf₁ n).1,
ext, simp },
{ refine filter.eventually_of_forall (λ a, _),
simp [supr_monotone' f _] },
{ refine filter.eventually_of_forall (λ a, _),
simp [tendsto_at_top_supr (supr_monotone' f a)] } },
have hξm : measurable ξ,
{ convert measurable_supr (λ n, (supr_mem_measurable_le _ hf₁ n).1),
ext, simp [hξ] },
-- `ξ` is the `f` in the theorem statement and we set `μ₁` to be `μ - ν.with_density ξ`
-- since we need `μ₁ + ν.with_density ξ = μ`
set μ₁ := μ - ν.with_density ξ with hμ₁,
have hle : ν.with_density ξ ≤ μ,
{ intros B hB,
rw [hξ, with_density_apply _ hB],
simp_rw [supr_apply],
rw lintegral_supr (λ i, (supr_mem_measurable_le _ hf₁ i).1) (supr_monotone _),
exact supr_le (λ i, (supr_mem_measurable_le _ hf₁ i).2 B hB) },
haveI : is_finite_measure (ν.with_density ξ),
{ refine is_finite_measure_with_density _,
have hle' := hle univ measurable_set.univ,
rw [with_density_apply _ measurable_set.univ, measure.restrict_univ] at hle',
exact ne_top_of_le_ne_top (measure_ne_top _ _) hle' },
refine ⟨⟨μ₁, ξ⟩, hξm, _, _⟩,
{ by_contra,
-- if they are not mutually singular, then from `exists_positive_of_not_mutually_singular`,
-- there exists some `ε > 0` and a measurable set `E`, such that `μ(E) > 0` and `E` is
-- positive with respect to `ν - εμ`
obtain ⟨ε, hε₁, E, hE₁, hE₂, hE₃⟩ := exists_positive_of_not_mutually_singular μ₁ ν h,
simp_rw hμ₁ at hE₃,
have hξle : ∀ A, measurable_set A → ∫⁻ a in A, ξ a ∂ν ≤ μ A,
{ intros A hA, rw hξ,
simp_rw [supr_apply],
rw lintegral_supr (λ n, (supr_mem_measurable_le _ hf₁ n).1) (supr_monotone _),
exact supr_le (λ n, (supr_mem_measurable_le _ hf₁ n).2 A hA) },
-- since `E` is positive, we have `∫⁻ a in A ∩ E, ε + ξ a ∂ν ≤ μ (A ∩ E)` for all `A`
have hε₂ : ∀ A : set α, measurable_set A → ∫⁻ a in A ∩ E, ε + ξ a ∂ν ≤ μ (A ∩ E),
{ intros A hA,
have := subset_le_of_restrict_le_restrict _ _ hE₁ hE₃ (inter_subset_right A E),
rwa [zero_apply, to_signed_measure_sub_apply (hA.inter hE₁),
measure.sub_apply (hA.inter hE₁) hle,
ennreal.to_real_sub_of_le _ (ne_of_lt (measure_lt_top _ _)), sub_nonneg,
le_sub_iff_add_le, ← ennreal.to_real_add, ennreal.to_real_le_to_real,
measure.coe_smul, pi.smul_apply, with_density_apply _ (hA.inter hE₁),
show ε • ν (A ∩ E) = (ε : ℝ≥0∞) * ν (A ∩ E), by refl,
← set_lintegral_const, ← lintegral_add_left measurable_const] at this,
{ rw [ne.def, ennreal.add_eq_top, not_or_distrib],
exact ⟨ne_of_lt (measure_lt_top _ _), ne_of_lt (measure_lt_top _ _)⟩ },
{ exact ne_of_lt (measure_lt_top _ _) },
{ exact ne_of_lt (measure_lt_top _ _) },
{ exact ne_of_lt (measure_lt_top _ _) },
{ rw with_density_apply _ (hA.inter hE₁),
exact hξle (A ∩ E) (hA.inter hE₁) },
{ apply_instance } },
-- from this, we can show `ξ + ε * E.indicator` is a function in `measurable_le` with
-- integral greater than `ξ`
have hξε : ξ + E.indicator (λ _, ε) ∈ measurable_le ν μ,
{ refine ⟨measurable.add hξm (measurable.indicator measurable_const hE₁), λ A hA, _⟩,
have : ∫⁻ a in A, (ξ + E.indicator (λ _, ε)) a ∂ν =
∫⁻ a in A ∩ E, ε + ξ a ∂ν + ∫⁻ a in A \ E, ξ a ∂ν,
{ simp only [lintegral_add_left measurable_const, lintegral_add_left hξm,
set_lintegral_const, add_assoc, lintegral_inter_add_diff _ _ hE₁, pi.add_apply,
lintegral_indicator _ hE₁, restrict_apply hE₁],
rw [inter_comm, add_comm] },
rw [this, ← measure_inter_add_diff A hE₁],
exact add_le_add (hε₂ A hA) (hξle (A \ E) (hA.diff hE₁)) },
have : ∫⁻ a, ξ a + E.indicator (λ _, ε) a ∂ν ≤ Sup (measurable_le_eval ν μ) :=
le_Sup ⟨ξ + E.indicator (λ _, ε), hξε, rfl⟩,
-- but this contradicts the maximality of `∫⁻ x, ξ x ∂ν`
refine not_lt.2 this _,
rw [hξ₁, lintegral_add_left hξm, lintegral_indicator _ hE₁, set_lintegral_const],
refine ennreal.lt_add_right _ (ennreal.mul_pos_iff.2 ⟨ennreal.coe_pos.2 hε₁, hE₂⟩).ne',
have := measure_ne_top (ν.with_density ξ) univ,
rwa [with_density_apply _ measurable_set.univ, measure.restrict_univ] at this },
-- since `ν.with_density ξ ≤ μ`, it is clear that `μ = μ₁ + ν.with_density ξ`
{ rw hμ₁, ext1 A hA,
rw [measure.coe_add, pi.add_apply, measure.sub_apply hA hle,
add_comm, add_tsub_cancel_of_le (hle A hA)] },
end⟩
local attribute [instance] have_lebesgue_decomposition_of_finite_measure
instance {S : μ.finite_spanning_sets_in {s : set α | measurable_set s}} (n : ℕ) :
is_finite_measure (μ.restrict $ S.set n) :=
⟨by { rw [restrict_apply measurable_set.univ, univ_inter], exact S.finite _ }⟩
/-- **The Lebesgue decomposition theorem**: Any pair of σ-finite measures `μ` and `ν`
`have_lebesgue_decomposition`. That is to say, there exist a measure `ξ` and a measurable function
`f`, such that `ξ` is mutually singular with respect to `ν` and `μ = ξ + ν.with_density f` -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance have_lebesgue_decomposition_of_sigma_finite
(μ ν : measure α) [sigma_finite μ] [sigma_finite ν] :
have_lebesgue_decomposition μ ν :=
⟨begin
-- Since `μ` and `ν` are both σ-finite, there exists a sequence of pairwise disjoint spanning
-- sets which are finite with respect to both `μ` and `ν`
obtain ⟨S, T, h₁, h₂⟩ := exists_eq_disjoint_finite_spanning_sets_in μ ν,
have h₃ : pairwise (disjoint on T.set) := h₁ ▸ h₂,
-- We define `μn` and `νn` as sequences of measures such that `μn n = μ ∩ S n` and
-- `νn n = ν ∩ S n` where `S` is the aforementioned finite spanning set sequence.
-- Since `S` is spanning, it is clear that `sum μn = μ` and `sum νn = ν`
set μn : ℕ → measure α := λ n, μ.restrict (S.set n) with hμn,
have hμ : μ = sum μn,
{ rw [hμn, ← restrict_Union h₂ S.set_mem, S.spanning, restrict_univ] },
set νn : ℕ → measure α := λ n, ν.restrict (T.set n) with hνn,
have hν : ν = sum νn,
{ rw [hνn, ← restrict_Union h₃ T.set_mem, T.spanning, restrict_univ] },
-- As `S` is finite with respect to both `μ` and `ν`, it is clear that `μn n` and `νn n` are
-- finite measures for all `n : ℕ`. Thus, we may apply the finite Lebesgue decomposition theorem
-- to `μn n` and `νn n`. We define `ξ` as the sum of the singular part of the Lebesgue
-- decompositions of `μn n` and `νn n`, and `f` as the sum of the Radon-Nikodym derviatives of
-- `μn n` and `νn n` restricted on `S n`
set ξ := sum (λ n, singular_part (μn n) (νn n)) with hξ,
set f := ∑' n, (S.set n).indicator (rn_deriv (μn n) (νn n)) with hf,
-- I claim `ξ` and `f` form a Lebesgue decomposition of `μ` and `ν`
refine ⟨⟨ξ, f⟩, _, _, _⟩,
{ exact measurable.ennreal_tsum' (λ n, measurable.indicator
(measurable_rn_deriv (μn n) (νn n)) (S.set_mem n)) },
-- We show that `ξ` is mutually singular with respect to `ν`
{ choose A hA₁ hA₂ hA₃ using λ n, mutually_singular_singular_part (μn n) (νn n),
simp only [hξ],
-- We use the set `B := ⋃ j, (S.set j) ∩ A j` where `A n` is the set provided as
-- `singular_part (μn n) (νn n) ⟂ₘ νn n`
refine ⟨⋃ j, (S.set j) ∩ A j,
measurable_set.Union (λ n, (S.set_mem n).inter (hA₁ n)), _, _⟩,
-- `ξ B = 0` since `ξ B = ∑ i j, singular_part (μn j) (νn j) (S.set i ∩ A i)`
-- `= ∑ i, singular_part (μn i) (νn i) (S.set i ∩ A i)`
-- `≤ ∑ i, singular_part (μn i) (νn i) (A i) = 0`
-- where the second equality follows as `singular_part (μn j) (νn j) (S.set i ∩ A i)` vanishes
-- for all `i ≠ j`
{ rw [measure_Union],
{ have : ∀ i, (sum (λ n, (μn n).singular_part (νn n))) (S.set i ∩ A i) =
(μn i).singular_part (νn i) (S.set i ∩ A i),
{ intro i, rw [sum_apply _ ((S.set_mem i).inter (hA₁ i)), tsum_eq_single i],
{ intros j hij,
rw [hμn, ← nonpos_iff_eq_zero],
refine le_trans ((singular_part_le _ _) _ ((S.set_mem i).inter (hA₁ i))) (le_of_eq _),
rw [restrict_apply ((S.set_mem i).inter (hA₁ i)), inter_comm, ← inter_assoc],
have : disjoint (S.set j) (S.set i) := h₂ hij,
rw disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty at this,
rw [this, empty_inter, measure_empty] },
{ apply_instance } },
simp_rw [this, tsum_eq_zero_iff ennreal.summable],
intro n, exact measure_mono_null (inter_subset_right _ _) (hA₂ n) },
{ exact h₂.mono (λ i j, disjoint.mono inf_le_left inf_le_left) },
{ exact λ n, (S.set_mem n).inter (hA₁ n) } },
-- We will now show `ν Bᶜ = 0`. This follows since `Bᶜ = ⋃ n, S.set n ∩ (A n)ᶜ` and thus,
-- `ν Bᶜ = ∑ i, ν (S.set i ∩ (A i)ᶜ) = ∑ i, (νn i) (A i)ᶜ = 0`
{ have hcompl : is_compl (⋃ n, (S.set n ∩ A n)) (⋃ n, S.set n ∩ (A n)ᶜ),
{ split,
{ rw disjoint_iff_inf_le,
rintro x ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩, rw mem_Union at hx₁ hx₂,
obtain ⟨⟨i, hi₁, hi₂⟩, ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩⟩ := ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩,
have : i = j,
{ by_contra hij, exact (h₂ hij).le_bot ⟨hi₁, hj₁⟩ },
exact hj₂ (this ▸ hi₂) },
{ rw codisjoint_iff_le_sup,
intros x hx,
simp only [mem_Union, sup_eq_union, mem_inter_iff,
mem_union, mem_compl_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left],
intro h, push_neg at h,
rw [top_eq_univ, ← S.spanning, mem_Union] at hx,
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := hx,
exact ⟨i, hi, h i hi⟩ } },
rw [hcompl.compl_eq, measure_Union, tsum_eq_zero_iff ennreal.summable],
{ intro n, rw [inter_comm, ← restrict_apply (hA₁ n).compl, ← hA₃ n, hνn, h₁] },
{ exact h₂.mono (λ i j, disjoint.mono inf_le_left inf_le_left) },
{ exact λ n, (S.set_mem n).inter (hA₁ n).compl } } },
-- Finally, it remains to show `μ = ξ + ν.with_density f`. Since `μ = sum μn`, and
-- `ξ + ν.with_density f = ∑ n, singular_part (μn n) (νn n)`
-- `+ ν.with_density (rn_deriv (μn n) (νn n)) ∩ (S.set n)`,
-- it suffices to show that the individual summands are equal. This follows by the
-- Lebesgue decomposition properties on the individual `μn n` and `νn n`
{ simp only [hξ, hf, hμ],
rw [with_density_tsum _, sum_add_sum],
{ refine sum_congr (λ n, _),
conv_lhs { rw have_lebesgue_decomposition_add (μn n) (νn n) },
suffices heq : (νn n).with_density ((μn n).rn_deriv (νn n)) =
ν.with_density ((S.set n).indicator ((μn n).rn_deriv (νn n))),
{ rw heq },
rw [hν, with_density_indicator (S.set_mem n), restrict_sum _ (S.set_mem n)],
suffices hsumeq : sum (λ (i : ℕ), (νn i).restrict (S.set n)) = νn n,
{ rw hsumeq },
ext1 s hs,
rw [sum_apply _ hs, tsum_eq_single n, hνn, h₁,
restrict_restrict (T.set_mem n), inter_self],
{ intros m hm,
rw [hνn, h₁, restrict_restrict (T.set_mem n), (h₃ hm.symm).inter_eq, restrict_empty,
coe_zero, pi.zero_apply] },
{ apply_instance } },
{ exact λ n, measurable.indicator (measurable_rn_deriv _ _) (S.set_mem n) } },
end⟩
end measure
namespace signed_measure
open measure
/-- A signed measure `s` is said to `have_lebesgue_decomposition` with respect to a measure `μ`
if the positive part and the negative part of `s` both `have_lebesgue_decomposition` with
respect to `μ`. -/
class have_lebesgue_decomposition (s : signed_measure α) (μ : measure α) : Prop :=
(pos_part : s.to_jordan_decomposition.pos_part.have_lebesgue_decomposition μ)
(neg_part : s.to_jordan_decomposition.neg_part.have_lebesgue_decomposition μ)
attribute [instance] have_lebesgue_decomposition.pos_part
attribute [instance] have_lebesgue_decomposition.neg_part
lemma not_have_lebesgue_decomposition_iff (s : signed_measure α)
(μ : measure α) :
¬ s.have_lebesgue_decomposition μ ↔
¬ s.to_jordan_decomposition.pos_part.have_lebesgue_decomposition μ ∨
¬ s.to_jordan_decomposition.neg_part.have_lebesgue_decomposition μ :=
⟨λ h, not_or_of_imp (λ hp hn, h ⟨hp, hn⟩), λ h hl, (not_and_distrib.2 h) ⟨hl.1, hl.2⟩⟩
-- `infer_instance` directly does not work
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance have_lebesgue_decomposition_of_sigma_finite
(s : signed_measure α) (μ : measure α) [sigma_finite μ] :
s.have_lebesgue_decomposition μ :=
{ pos_part := infer_instance,
neg_part := infer_instance }
instance have_lebesgue_decomposition_neg
(s : signed_measure α) (μ : measure α) [s.have_lebesgue_decomposition μ] :
(-s).have_lebesgue_decomposition μ :=
{ pos_part :=
by { rw [to_jordan_decomposition_neg, jordan_decomposition.neg_pos_part],
apply_instance },
neg_part :=
by { rw [to_jordan_decomposition_neg, jordan_decomposition.neg_neg_part],
apply_instance } }
instance have_lebesgue_decomposition_smul
(s : signed_measure α) (μ : measure α) [s.have_lebesgue_decomposition μ] (r : ℝ≥0) :
(r • s).have_lebesgue_decomposition μ :=
{ pos_part :=
by { rw [to_jordan_decomposition_smul, jordan_decomposition.smul_pos_part],
apply_instance },
neg_part :=
by { rw [to_jordan_decomposition_smul, jordan_decomposition.smul_neg_part],
apply_instance } }
instance have_lebesgue_decomposition_smul_real
(s : signed_measure α) (μ : measure α) [s.have_lebesgue_decomposition μ] (r : ℝ) :
(r • s).have_lebesgue_decomposition μ :=
begin
by_cases hr : 0 ≤ r,
{ lift r to ℝ≥0 using hr,
exact s.have_lebesgue_decomposition_smul μ _ },
{ rw not_le at hr,
refine
{ pos_part :=
by { rw [to_jordan_decomposition_smul_real,
jordan_decomposition.real_smul_pos_part_neg _ _ hr],
apply_instance },
neg_part :=
by { rw [to_jordan_decomposition_smul_real,
jordan_decomposition.real_smul_neg_part_neg _ _ hr],
apply_instance } } }
end
/-- Given a signed measure `s` and a measure `μ`, `s.singular_part μ` is the signed measure
such that `s.singular_part μ + μ.with_densityᵥ (s.rn_deriv μ) = s` and
`s.singular_part μ` is mutually singular with respect to `μ`. -/
def singular_part (s : signed_measure α) (μ : measure α) : signed_measure α :=
(s.to_jordan_decomposition.pos_part.singular_part μ).to_signed_measure -
(s.to_jordan_decomposition.neg_part.singular_part μ).to_signed_measure
section
lemma singular_part_mutually_singular (s : signed_measure α) (μ : measure α) :
s.to_jordan_decomposition.pos_part.singular_part μ ⟂ₘ
s.to_jordan_decomposition.neg_part.singular_part μ :=
begin
by_cases hl : s.have_lebesgue_decomposition μ,
{ haveI := hl,
obtain ⟨i, hi, hpos, hneg⟩ := s.to_jordan_decomposition.mutually_singular,
rw s.to_jordan_decomposition.pos_part.have_lebesgue_decomposition_add μ at hpos,
rw s.to_jordan_decomposition.neg_part.have_lebesgue_decomposition_add μ at hneg,
rw [add_apply, add_eq_zero_iff] at hpos hneg,
exact ⟨i, hi, hpos.1, hneg.1⟩ },
{ rw not_have_lebesgue_decomposition_iff at hl,
cases hl with hp hn,
{ rw [measure.singular_part, dif_neg hp],
exact mutually_singular.zero_left },
{ rw [measure.singular_part, measure.singular_part, dif_neg hn],
exact mutually_singular.zero_right } }
end
lemma singular_part_total_variation (s : signed_measure α) (μ : measure α) :
(s.singular_part μ).total_variation =
s.to_jordan_decomposition.pos_part.singular_part μ +
s.to_jordan_decomposition.neg_part.singular_part μ :=
begin
have : (s.singular_part μ).to_jordan_decomposition =
⟨s.to_jordan_decomposition.pos_part.singular_part μ,
s.to_jordan_decomposition.neg_part.singular_part μ, singular_part_mutually_singular s μ⟩,
{ refine jordan_decomposition.to_signed_measure_injective _,
rw to_signed_measure_to_jordan_decomposition,
refl },
{ rw [total_variation, this] },
end
lemma mutually_singular_singular_part (s : signed_measure α) (μ : measure α) :
singular_part s μ ⟂ᵥ μ.to_ennreal_vector_measure :=
begin
rw [mutually_singular_ennreal_iff, singular_part_total_variation],
change _ ⟂ₘ vector_measure.equiv_measure.to_fun (vector_measure.equiv_measure.inv_fun μ),
rw vector_measure.equiv_measure.right_inv μ,
exact (mutually_singular_singular_part _ _).add_left (mutually_singular_singular_part _ _)
end
end
/-- The Radon-Nikodym derivative between a signed measure and a positive measure.
`rn_deriv s μ` satisfies `μ.with_densityᵥ (s.rn_deriv μ) = s`
if and only if `s` is absolutely continuous with respect to `μ` and this fact is known as
`measure_theory.signed_measure.absolutely_continuous_iff_with_density_rn_deriv_eq`
and can be found in `measure_theory.decomposition.radon_nikodym`. -/
def rn_deriv (s : signed_measure α) (μ : measure α) : α → ℝ := λ x,
(s.to_jordan_decomposition.pos_part.rn_deriv μ x).to_real -
(s.to_jordan_decomposition.neg_part.rn_deriv μ x).to_real
variables {s t : signed_measure α}
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_rn_deriv (s : signed_measure α) (μ : measure α) :
measurable (rn_deriv s μ) :=
begin
rw [rn_deriv],
measurability,
end
lemma integrable_rn_deriv (s : signed_measure α) (μ : measure α) :
integrable (rn_deriv s μ) μ :=
begin
refine integrable.sub _ _;
{ split,
{ apply measurable.ae_strongly_measurable, measurability },
exact has_finite_integral_to_real_of_lintegral_ne_top
(lintegral_rn_deriv_lt_top _ μ).ne }
end
variables (s μ)
/-- **The Lebesgue Decomposition theorem between a signed measure and a measure**:
Given a signed measure `s` and a σ-finite measure `μ`, there exist a signed measure `t` and a
measurable and integrable function `f`, such that `t` is mutually singular with respect to `μ`
and `s = t + μ.with_densityᵥ f`. In this case `t = s.singular_part μ` and
`f = s.rn_deriv μ`. -/
theorem singular_part_add_with_density_rn_deriv_eq
[s.have_lebesgue_decomposition μ] :
s.singular_part μ + μ.with_densityᵥ (s.rn_deriv μ) = s :=
begin
conv_rhs { rw [← to_signed_measure_to_jordan_decomposition s,
jordan_decomposition.to_signed_measure] },
rw [singular_part, rn_deriv, with_densityᵥ_sub'
(integrable_to_real_of_lintegral_ne_top _ _) (integrable_to_real_of_lintegral_ne_top _ _),
with_densityᵥ_to_real, with_densityᵥ_to_real, sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg,
add_comm (s.to_jordan_decomposition.pos_part.singular_part μ).to_signed_measure, ← add_assoc,
add_assoc (-(s.to_jordan_decomposition.neg_part.singular_part μ).to_signed_measure),
← to_signed_measure_add, add_comm, ← add_assoc, ← neg_add, ← to_signed_measure_add,
add_comm, ← sub_eq_add_neg],
convert rfl, -- `convert rfl` much faster than `congr`
{ exact (s.to_jordan_decomposition.pos_part.have_lebesgue_decomposition_add μ) },
{ rw add_comm,
exact (s.to_jordan_decomposition.neg_part.have_lebesgue_decomposition_add μ) },
all_goals { exact (lintegral_rn_deriv_lt_top _ _).ne <|> measurability }
end
variables {s μ}
lemma jordan_decomposition_add_with_density_mutually_singular
{f : α → ℝ} (hf : measurable f) (htμ : t ⟂ᵥ μ.to_ennreal_vector_measure) :
t.to_jordan_decomposition.pos_part + μ.with_density (λ (x : α), ennreal.of_real (f x)) ⟂ₘ
t.to_jordan_decomposition.neg_part + μ.with_density (λ (x : α), ennreal.of_real (-f x)) :=
begin
rw [mutually_singular_ennreal_iff, total_variation_mutually_singular_iff] at htμ,
change _ ⟂ₘ vector_measure.equiv_measure.to_fun (vector_measure.equiv_measure.inv_fun μ) ∧
_ ⟂ₘ vector_measure.equiv_measure.to_fun (vector_measure.equiv_measure.inv_fun μ) at htμ,
rw [vector_measure.equiv_measure.right_inv] at htμ,
exact ((jordan_decomposition.mutually_singular _).add_right
(htμ.1.mono_ac (refl _) (with_density_absolutely_continuous _ _))).add_left
((htμ.2.symm.mono_ac (with_density_absolutely_continuous _ _) (refl _)).add_right
(with_density_of_real_mutually_singular hf))
end
lemma to_jordan_decomposition_eq_of_eq_add_with_density
{f : α → ℝ} (hf : measurable f) (hfi : integrable f μ)
(htμ : t ⟂ᵥ μ.to_ennreal_vector_measure) (hadd : s = t + μ.with_densityᵥ f) :
s.to_jordan_decomposition = @jordan_decomposition.mk α _
(t.to_jordan_decomposition.pos_part + μ.with_density (λ x, ennreal.of_real (f x)))
(t.to_jordan_decomposition.neg_part + μ.with_density (λ x, ennreal.of_real (- f x)))
(by { haveI := is_finite_measure_with_density_of_real hfi.2, apply_instance })
(by { haveI := is_finite_measure_with_density_of_real hfi.neg.2, apply_instance })
(jordan_decomposition_add_with_density_mutually_singular hf htμ) :=
begin
haveI := is_finite_measure_with_density_of_real hfi.2,
haveI := is_finite_measure_with_density_of_real hfi.neg.2,
refine to_jordan_decomposition_eq _,
simp_rw [jordan_decomposition.to_signed_measure, hadd],
ext i hi,
rw [vector_measure.sub_apply, to_signed_measure_apply_measurable hi,
to_signed_measure_apply_measurable hi, add_apply, add_apply,
ennreal.to_real_add, ennreal.to_real_add, add_sub_add_comm,
← to_signed_measure_apply_measurable hi, ← to_signed_measure_apply_measurable hi,
← vector_measure.sub_apply, ← jordan_decomposition.to_signed_measure,
to_signed_measure_to_jordan_decomposition, vector_measure.add_apply,
← to_signed_measure_apply_measurable hi, ← to_signed_measure_apply_measurable hi,
with_densityᵥ_eq_with_density_pos_part_sub_with_density_neg_part hfi,
vector_measure.sub_apply];
exact (measure_lt_top _ _).ne
end
private lemma have_lebesgue_decomposition_mk' (μ : measure α)
{f : α → ℝ} (hf : measurable f) (hfi : integrable f μ)
(htμ : t ⟂ᵥ μ.to_ennreal_vector_measure) (hadd : s = t + μ.with_densityᵥ f) :
s.have_lebesgue_decomposition μ :=
begin
have htμ' := htμ,
rw mutually_singular_ennreal_iff at htμ,
change _ ⟂ₘ vector_measure.equiv_measure.to_fun (vector_measure.equiv_measure.inv_fun μ) at htμ,
rw [vector_measure.equiv_measure.right_inv, total_variation_mutually_singular_iff] at htμ,
refine
{ pos_part :=
by { use ⟨t.to_jordan_decomposition.pos_part, λ x, ennreal.of_real (f x)⟩,
refine ⟨hf.ennreal_of_real, htμ.1, _⟩,
rw to_jordan_decomposition_eq_of_eq_add_with_density hf hfi htμ' hadd },
neg_part :=
by { use ⟨t.to_jordan_decomposition.neg_part, λ x, ennreal.of_real (-f x)⟩,
refine ⟨hf.neg.ennreal_of_real, htμ.2, _⟩,
rw to_jordan_decomposition_eq_of_eq_add_with_density hf hfi htμ' hadd } }
end
lemma have_lebesgue_decomposition_mk (μ : measure α) {f : α → ℝ} (hf : measurable f)
(htμ : t ⟂ᵥ μ.to_ennreal_vector_measure) (hadd : s = t + μ.with_densityᵥ f) :
s.have_lebesgue_decomposition μ :=
begin
by_cases hfi : integrable f μ,
{ exact have_lebesgue_decomposition_mk' μ hf hfi htμ hadd },
{ rw [with_densityᵥ, dif_neg hfi, add_zero] at hadd,
refine have_lebesgue_decomposition_mk' μ measurable_zero (integrable_zero _ _ μ) htμ _,
rwa [with_densityᵥ_zero, add_zero] }
end
private theorem eq_singular_part'
(t : signed_measure α) {f : α → ℝ} (hf : measurable f) (hfi : integrable f μ)
(htμ : t ⟂ᵥ μ.to_ennreal_vector_measure) (hadd : s = t + μ.with_densityᵥ f) :
t = s.singular_part μ :=
begin
have htμ' := htμ,
rw [mutually_singular_ennreal_iff, total_variation_mutually_singular_iff] at htμ,
change _ ⟂ₘ vector_measure.equiv_measure.to_fun (vector_measure.equiv_measure.inv_fun μ) ∧
_ ⟂ₘ vector_measure.equiv_measure.to_fun (vector_measure.equiv_measure.inv_fun μ) at htμ,
rw [vector_measure.equiv_measure.right_inv] at htμ,
{ rw [singular_part, ← t.to_signed_measure_to_jordan_decomposition,
jordan_decomposition.to_signed_measure],
congr,
{ have hfpos : measurable (λ x, ennreal.of_real (f x)), { measurability },
refine eq_singular_part hfpos htμ.1 _,
rw to_jordan_decomposition_eq_of_eq_add_with_density hf hfi htμ' hadd },
{ have hfneg : measurable (λ x, ennreal.of_real (-f x)), { measurability },
refine eq_singular_part hfneg htμ.2 _,
rw to_jordan_decomposition_eq_of_eq_add_with_density hf hfi htμ' hadd } },
end
/-- Given a measure `μ`, signed measures `s` and `t`, and a function `f` such that `t` is
mutually singular with respect to `μ` and `s = t + μ.with_densityᵥ f`, we have
`t = singular_part s μ`, i.e. `t` is the singular part of the Lebesgue decomposition between
`s` and `μ`. -/
theorem eq_singular_part (t : signed_measure α) (f : α → ℝ)
(htμ : t ⟂ᵥ μ.to_ennreal_vector_measure) (hadd : s = t + μ.with_densityᵥ f) :
t = s.singular_part μ :=
begin
by_cases hfi : integrable f μ,
{ refine eq_singular_part' t hfi.1.measurable_mk (hfi.congr hfi.1.ae_eq_mk) htμ _,
convert hadd using 2,
exact with_densityᵥ_eq.congr_ae hfi.1.ae_eq_mk.symm },
{ rw [with_densityᵥ, dif_neg hfi, add_zero] at hadd,
refine eq_singular_part' t measurable_zero (integrable_zero _ _ μ) htμ _,
rwa [with_densityᵥ_zero, add_zero] }
end
lemma singular_part_zero (μ : measure α) : (0 : signed_measure α).singular_part μ = 0 :=
begin
refine (eq_singular_part 0 0
vector_measure.mutually_singular.zero_left _).symm,
rw [zero_add, with_densityᵥ_zero],
end
lemma singular_part_neg (s : signed_measure α) (μ : measure α) :
(-s).singular_part μ = - s.singular_part μ :=
begin
have h₁ : ((-s).to_jordan_decomposition.pos_part.singular_part μ).to_signed_measure =
(s.to_jordan_decomposition.neg_part.singular_part μ).to_signed_measure,
{ refine to_signed_measure_congr _,
rw [to_jordan_decomposition_neg, jordan_decomposition.neg_pos_part] },
have h₂ : ((-s).to_jordan_decomposition.neg_part.singular_part μ).to_signed_measure =
(s.to_jordan_decomposition.pos_part.singular_part μ).to_signed_measure,
{ refine to_signed_measure_congr _,
rw [to_jordan_decomposition_neg, jordan_decomposition.neg_neg_part] },
rw [singular_part, singular_part, neg_sub, h₁, h₂],
end
lemma singular_part_smul_nnreal (s : signed_measure α) (μ : measure α) (r : ℝ≥0) :
(r • s).singular_part μ = r • s.singular_part μ :=
begin
rw [singular_part, singular_part, smul_sub, ← to_signed_measure_smul, ← to_signed_measure_smul],
conv_lhs { congr, congr,
rw [to_jordan_decomposition_smul, jordan_decomposition.smul_pos_part,
singular_part_smul], skip, congr,
rw [to_jordan_decomposition_smul, jordan_decomposition.smul_neg_part,
singular_part_smul] }
end
lemma singular_part_smul (s : signed_measure α) (μ : measure α) (r : ℝ) :
(r • s).singular_part μ = r • s.singular_part μ :=
begin
by_cases hr : 0 ≤ r,
{ lift r to ℝ≥0 using hr,
exact singular_part_smul_nnreal s μ r },
{ rw [singular_part, singular_part],
conv_lhs { congr, congr,
rw [to_jordan_decomposition_smul_real,
jordan_decomposition.real_smul_pos_part_neg _ _ (not_le.1 hr), singular_part_smul],
skip, congr,
rw [to_jordan_decomposition_smul_real,
jordan_decomposition.real_smul_neg_part_neg _ _ (not_le.1 hr), singular_part_smul] },
rw [to_signed_measure_smul, to_signed_measure_smul, ← neg_sub, ← smul_sub],
change -(((-r).to_nnreal : ℝ) • _) = _,
rw [← neg_smul, real.coe_to_nnreal _ (le_of_lt (neg_pos.mpr (not_le.1 hr))), neg_neg] }
end
lemma singular_part_add (s t : signed_measure α) (μ : measure α)
[s.have_lebesgue_decomposition μ] [t.have_lebesgue_decomposition μ] :
(s + t).singular_part μ = s.singular_part μ + t.singular_part μ :=
begin
refine (eq_singular_part _ (s.rn_deriv μ + t.rn_deriv μ)
((mutually_singular_singular_part s μ).add_left (mutually_singular_singular_part t μ)) _).symm,
erw [with_densityᵥ_add (integrable_rn_deriv s μ) (integrable_rn_deriv t μ)],
rw [add_assoc, add_comm (t.singular_part μ), add_assoc, add_comm _ (t.singular_part μ),
singular_part_add_with_density_rn_deriv_eq, ← add_assoc,
singular_part_add_with_density_rn_deriv_eq],
end
lemma singular_part_sub (s t : signed_measure α) (μ : measure α)
[s.have_lebesgue_decomposition μ] [t.have_lebesgue_decomposition μ] :
(s - t).singular_part μ = s.singular_part μ - t.singular_part μ :=
by { rw [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, singular_part_add, singular_part_neg] }
/-- Given a measure `μ`, signed measures `s` and `t`, and a function `f` such that `t` is
mutually singular with respect to `μ` and `s = t + μ.with_densityᵥ f`, we have
`f = rn_deriv s μ`, i.e. `f` is the Radon-Nikodym derivative of `s` and `μ`. -/
theorem eq_rn_deriv (t : signed_measure α) (f : α → ℝ) (hfi : integrable f μ)
(htμ : t ⟂ᵥ μ.to_ennreal_vector_measure) (hadd : s = t + μ.with_densityᵥ f) :
f =ᵐ[μ] s.rn_deriv μ :=
begin
set f' := hfi.1.mk f,
have hadd' : s = t + μ.with_densityᵥ f',
{ convert hadd using 2,
exact with_densityᵥ_eq.congr_ae hfi.1.ae_eq_mk.symm },
haveI := have_lebesgue_decomposition_mk μ hfi.1.measurable_mk htμ hadd',
refine (integrable.ae_eq_of_with_densityᵥ_eq (integrable_rn_deriv _ _) hfi _).symm,
rw [← add_right_inj t, ← hadd, eq_singular_part _ f htμ hadd,
singular_part_add_with_density_rn_deriv_eq],
end
lemma rn_deriv_neg (s : signed_measure α) (μ : measure α) [s.have_lebesgue_decomposition μ] :
(-s).rn_deriv μ =ᵐ[μ] - s.rn_deriv μ :=
begin
refine integrable.ae_eq_of_with_densityᵥ_eq
(integrable_rn_deriv _ _) (integrable_rn_deriv _ _).neg _,
rw [with_densityᵥ_neg, ← add_right_inj ((-s).singular_part μ),
singular_part_add_with_density_rn_deriv_eq, singular_part_neg, ← neg_add,
singular_part_add_with_density_rn_deriv_eq]
end
lemma rn_deriv_smul (s : signed_measure α) (μ : measure α) [s.have_lebesgue_decomposition μ]
(r : ℝ) :
(r • s).rn_deriv μ =ᵐ[μ] r • s.rn_deriv μ :=
begin
refine integrable.ae_eq_of_with_densityᵥ_eq
(integrable_rn_deriv _ _) ((integrable_rn_deriv _ _).smul r) _,
change _ = μ.with_densityᵥ ((r : ℝ) • s.rn_deriv μ),
rw [with_densityᵥ_smul (rn_deriv s μ) (r : ℝ),
← add_right_inj ((r • s).singular_part μ),
singular_part_add_with_density_rn_deriv_eq, singular_part_smul],
change _ = _ + r • _,
rw [← smul_add, singular_part_add_with_density_rn_deriv_eq],
end
lemma rn_deriv_add (s t : signed_measure α) (μ : measure α)
[s.have_lebesgue_decomposition μ] [t.have_lebesgue_decomposition μ]
[(s + t).have_lebesgue_decomposition μ] :
(s + t).rn_deriv μ =ᵐ[μ] s.rn_deriv μ + t.rn_deriv μ :=
begin
refine integrable.ae_eq_of_with_densityᵥ_eq
(integrable_rn_deriv _ _)
((integrable_rn_deriv _ _).add (integrable_rn_deriv _ _)) _,
rw [← add_right_inj ((s + t).singular_part μ),
singular_part_add_with_density_rn_deriv_eq,
with_densityᵥ_add (integrable_rn_deriv _ _) (integrable_rn_deriv _ _),
singular_part_add, add_assoc, add_comm (t.singular_part μ), add_assoc,
add_comm _ (t.singular_part μ), singular_part_add_with_density_rn_deriv_eq,
← add_assoc, singular_part_add_with_density_rn_deriv_eq],
end
lemma rn_deriv_sub (s t : signed_measure α) (μ : measure α)
[s.have_lebesgue_decomposition μ] [t.have_lebesgue_decomposition μ]
[hst : (s - t).have_lebesgue_decomposition μ] :
(s - t).rn_deriv μ =ᵐ[μ] s.rn_deriv μ - t.rn_deriv μ :=
begin
rw sub_eq_add_neg at hst,
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg],
exactI ae_eq_trans (rn_deriv_add _ _ _)
(filter.eventually_eq.add (ae_eq_refl _) (rn_deriv_neg _ _)),
end
end signed_measure
namespace complex_measure
/-- A complex measure is said to `have_lebesgue_decomposition` with respect to a positive measure
if both its real and imaginary part `have_lebesgue_decomposition` with respect to that measure. -/
class have_lebesgue_decomposition (c : complex_measure α) (μ : measure α) : Prop :=
(re_part : c.re.have_lebesgue_decomposition μ)
(im_part : c.im.have_lebesgue_decomposition μ)
attribute [instance] have_lebesgue_decomposition.re_part
attribute [instance] have_lebesgue_decomposition.im_part
/-- The singular part between a complex measure `c` and a positive measure `μ` is the complex
measure satisfying `c.singular_part μ + μ.with_densityᵥ (c.rn_deriv μ) = c`. This property is given
by `measure_theory.complex_measure.singular_part_add_with_density_rn_deriv_eq`. -/
def singular_part (c : complex_measure α) (μ : measure α) : complex_measure α :=
(c.re.singular_part μ).to_complex_measure (c.im.singular_part μ)
/-- The Radon-Nikodym derivative between a complex measure and a positive measure. -/
def rn_deriv (c : complex_measure α) (μ : measure α) : α → ℂ :=
λ x, ⟨c.re.rn_deriv μ x, c.im.rn_deriv μ x⟩
variable {c : complex_measure α}
lemma integrable_rn_deriv (c : complex_measure α) (μ : measure α) :
integrable (c.rn_deriv μ) μ :=
begin
rw [← mem_ℒp_one_iff_integrable, ← mem_ℒp_re_im_iff],
exact ⟨mem_ℒp_one_iff_integrable.2 (signed_measure.integrable_rn_deriv _ _),
mem_ℒp_one_iff_integrable.2 (signed_measure.integrable_rn_deriv _ _)⟩
end
theorem singular_part_add_with_density_rn_deriv_eq [c.have_lebesgue_decomposition μ] :
c.singular_part μ + μ.with_densityᵥ (c.rn_deriv μ) = c :=
begin
conv_rhs { rw [← c.to_complex_measure_to_signed_measure] },
ext i hi : 1,
rw [vector_measure.add_apply, signed_measure.to_complex_measure_apply],
ext,
{ rw [complex.add_re, with_densityᵥ_apply (c.integrable_rn_deriv μ) hi,
←is_R_or_C.re_eq_complex_re, ←integral_re (c.integrable_rn_deriv μ).integrable_on,
is_R_or_C.re_eq_complex_re, ← with_densityᵥ_apply _ hi],
{ change (c.re.singular_part μ + μ.with_densityᵥ (c.re.rn_deriv μ)) i = _,
rw c.re.singular_part_add_with_density_rn_deriv_eq μ },
{ exact (signed_measure.integrable_rn_deriv _ _) } },
{ rw [complex.add_im, with_densityᵥ_apply (c.integrable_rn_deriv μ) hi,
←is_R_or_C.im_eq_complex_im, ←integral_im (c.integrable_rn_deriv μ).integrable_on,
is_R_or_C.im_eq_complex_im, ← with_densityᵥ_apply _ hi],
{ change (c.im.singular_part μ + μ.with_densityᵥ (c.im.rn_deriv μ)) i = _,
rw c.im.singular_part_add_with_density_rn_deriv_eq μ },
{ exact (signed_measure.integrable_rn_deriv _ _) } },
end
end complex_measure
end measure_theory
|
b49814c87a6d7cdddf00f067928cddf4f05ed49e | 618003631150032a5676f229d13a079ac875ff77 | /src/category_theory/monoidal/of_has_finite_products.lean | a9b349549d152268f1cd94eeb53bdc1432b3ebac | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | awainverse/mathlib | 939b68c8486df66cfda64d327ad3d9165248c777 | ea76bd8f3ca0a8bf0a166a06a475b10663dec44a | refs/heads/master | 1,659,592,962,036 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 268,436,019 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,590,990,500,000 | 1,590,990,500,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,490 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Simon Hudon
-/
import category_theory.monoidal.category
import category_theory.limits.shapes.binary_products
import category_theory.limits.types
/-!
# The natural monoidal structure on any category with finite (co)products.
A category with a monoidal structure provided in this way is sometimes called a (co)cartesian category,
although this is also sometimes used to mean a finitely complete category.
(See <https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/cartesian+category>.)
As this works with either products or coproducts,
and sometimes we want to think of a different monoidal structure entirely,
we don't set up either construct as an instance.
## Implementation
For the sake of nicer definitional properties,
we rely on `has_terminal` and `has_binary_products` instead of `has_finite_products`,
so that if a particular category provides customised instances of these
we pick those up instead.
-/
universes v u
namespace category_theory
open category_theory.limits
variables (C : Type u) [category.{v} C]
section
local attribute [tidy] tactic.case_bash
/-- A category with a terminal object and binary products has a natural monoidal structure. -/
def monoidal_of_has_finite_products [has_terminal.{v} C] [has_binary_products.{v} C] : monoidal_category C :=
{ tensor_unit := ⊤_ C,
tensor_obj := λ X Y, X ⨯ Y,
tensor_hom := λ _ _ _ _ f g, limits.prod.map f g,
associator := prod.associator,
left_unitor := prod.left_unitor,
right_unitor := prod.right_unitor,
pentagon' := prod.pentagon,
triangle' := prod.triangle,
associator_naturality' := @prod.associator_naturality _ _ _, }
end
namespace monoidal_of_has_finite_products
variables [has_terminal.{v} C] [has_binary_products.{v} C]
local attribute [instance] monoidal_of_has_finite_products
@[simp]
lemma left_unitor_hom (X : C) : (λ_ X).hom = limits.prod.snd := rfl
@[simp]
lemma left_unitor_inv (X : C) : (λ_ X).inv = prod.lift (terminal.from X) (𝟙 _) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma right_unitor_hom (X : C) : (ρ_ X).hom = limits.prod.fst := rfl
@[simp]
lemma right_unitor_inv (X : C) : (ρ_ X).inv = prod.lift (𝟙 _) (terminal.from X) := rfl
-- We don't mark this as a simp lemma, even though in many particular
-- categories the right hand side will simplify significantly further.
-- For now, we'll plan to create specialised simp lemmas in each particular category.
lemma associator_hom (X Y Z : C) :
(α_ X Y Z).hom =
prod.lift
(limits.prod.fst ≫ limits.prod.fst)
(prod.lift (limits.prod.fst ≫ limits.prod.snd) limits.prod.snd) := rfl
end monoidal_of_has_finite_products
section
local attribute [tidy] tactic.case_bash
/-- A category with an initial object and binary coproducts has a natural monoidal structure. -/
def monoidal_of_has_finite_coproducts [has_initial.{v} C] [has_binary_coproducts.{v} C] : monoidal_category C :=
{ tensor_unit := ⊥_ C,
tensor_obj := λ X Y, X ⨿ Y,
tensor_hom := λ _ _ _ _ f g, limits.coprod.map f g,
associator := coprod.associator,
left_unitor := coprod.left_unitor,
right_unitor := coprod.right_unitor,
pentagon' := coprod.pentagon,
triangle' := coprod.triangle,
associator_naturality' := @coprod.associator_naturality _ _ _, }
end
namespace monoidal_of_has_finite_coproducts
variables [has_initial.{v} C] [has_binary_coproducts.{v} C]
local attribute [instance] monoidal_of_has_finite_coproducts
@[simp]
lemma left_unitor_hom (X : C) : (λ_ X).hom = coprod.desc (initial.to X) (𝟙 _) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma right_unitor_hom (X : C) : (ρ_ X).hom = coprod.desc (𝟙 _) (initial.to X) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma left_unitor_inv (X : C) : (λ_ X).inv = limits.coprod.inr := rfl
@[simp]
lemma right_unitor_inv (X : C) : (ρ_ X).inv = limits.coprod.inl := rfl
-- We don't mark this as a simp lemma, even though in many particular
-- categories the right hand side will simplify significantly further.
-- For now, we'll plan to create specialised simp lemmas in each particular category.
lemma associator_hom (X Y Z : C) :
(α_ X Y Z).hom =
coprod.desc
(coprod.desc coprod.inl (coprod.inl ≫ coprod.inr))
(coprod.inr ≫ coprod.inr) := rfl
end monoidal_of_has_finite_coproducts
end category_theory
-- TODO in fact, a category with finite products is braided, and symmetric,
-- and we should say that here, once braided categories arrive in mathlib.
|
85218c5767456eaafb71f80cf654704a5427a088 | 57c233acf9386e610d99ed20ef139c5f97504ba3 | /src/order/complete_lattice.lean | 8c07ab547779d3989a233ad36d2598da4806d67c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | robertylewis/mathlib | 3d16e3e6daf5ddde182473e03a1b601d2810952c | 1d13f5b932f5e40a8308e3840f96fc882fae01f0 | refs/heads/master | 1,651,379,945,369 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 98,875,504 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,644,253,514,000 | 1,501,495,700,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 56,566 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import data.bool.set
import data.nat.basic
import order.bounds
/-!
# Theory of complete lattices
## Main definitions
* `Sup` and `Inf` are the supremum and the infimum of a set;
* `supr (f : ι → α)` and `infi (f : ι → α)` are indexed supremum and infimum of a function,
defined as `Sup` and `Inf` of the range of this function;
* `class complete_lattice`: a bounded lattice such that `Sup s` is always the least upper boundary
of `s` and `Inf s` is always the greatest lower boundary of `s`;
* `class complete_linear_order`: a linear ordered complete lattice.
## Naming conventions
We use `Sup`/`Inf`/`supr`/`infi` for the corresponding functions in the statement. Sometimes we
also use `bsupr`/`binfi` for "bounded" supremum or infimum, i.e. one of `⨆ i ∈ s, f i`,
`⨆ i (hi : p i), f i`, or more generally `⨆ i (hi : p i), f i hi`.
## Notation
* `⨆ i, f i` : `supr f`, the supremum of the range of `f`;
* `⨅ i, f i` : `infi f`, the infimum of the range of `f`.
-/
set_option old_structure_cmd true
open set function
variables {α β β₂ : Type*} {ι ι₂ : Sort*}
/-- class for the `Sup` operator -/
class has_Sup (α : Type*) := (Sup : set α → α)
/-- class for the `Inf` operator -/
class has_Inf (α : Type*) := (Inf : set α → α)
export has_Sup (Sup) has_Inf (Inf)
/-- Supremum of a set -/
add_decl_doc has_Sup.Sup
/-- Infimum of a set -/
add_decl_doc has_Inf.Inf
/-- Indexed supremum -/
def supr [has_Sup α] {ι} (s : ι → α) : α := Sup (range s)
/-- Indexed infimum -/
def infi [has_Inf α] {ι} (s : ι → α) : α := Inf (range s)
@[priority 50] instance has_Inf_to_nonempty (α) [has_Inf α] : nonempty α := ⟨Inf ∅⟩
@[priority 50] instance has_Sup_to_nonempty (α) [has_Sup α] : nonempty α := ⟨Sup ∅⟩
notation `⨆` binders `, ` r:(scoped f, supr f) := r
notation `⨅` binders `, ` r:(scoped f, infi f) := r
instance (α) [has_Inf α] : has_Sup (order_dual α) := ⟨(Inf : set α → α)⟩
instance (α) [has_Sup α] : has_Inf (order_dual α) := ⟨(Sup : set α → α)⟩
/--
Note that we rarely use `complete_semilattice_Sup`
(in fact, any such object is always a `complete_lattice`, so it's usually best to start there).
Nevertheless it is sometimes a useful intermediate step in constructions.
-/
@[ancestor partial_order has_Sup]
class complete_semilattice_Sup (α : Type*) extends partial_order α, has_Sup α :=
(le_Sup : ∀s, ∀a∈s, a ≤ Sup s)
(Sup_le : ∀s a, (∀b∈s, b ≤ a) → Sup s ≤ a)
section
variables [complete_semilattice_Sup α] {s t : set α} {a b : α}
@[ematch] theorem le_Sup : a ∈ s → a ≤ Sup s := complete_semilattice_Sup.le_Sup s a
theorem Sup_le : (∀b∈s, b ≤ a) → Sup s ≤ a := complete_semilattice_Sup.Sup_le s a
lemma is_lub_Sup (s : set α) : is_lub s (Sup s) := ⟨assume x, le_Sup, assume x, Sup_le⟩
lemma is_lub.Sup_eq (h : is_lub s a) : Sup s = a := (is_lub_Sup s).unique h
theorem le_Sup_of_le (hb : b ∈ s) (h : a ≤ b) : a ≤ Sup s :=
le_trans h (le_Sup hb)
theorem Sup_le_Sup (h : s ⊆ t) : Sup s ≤ Sup t :=
(is_lub_Sup s).mono (is_lub_Sup t) h
@[simp] theorem Sup_le_iff : Sup s ≤ a ↔ (∀b ∈ s, b ≤ a) :=
is_lub_le_iff (is_lub_Sup s)
lemma le_Sup_iff : a ≤ Sup s ↔ (∀ b ∈ upper_bounds s, a ≤ b) :=
⟨λ h b hb, le_trans h (Sup_le hb), λ hb, hb _ (λ x, le_Sup)⟩
theorem Sup_le_Sup_of_forall_exists_le (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, x ≤ y) : Sup s ≤ Sup t :=
le_Sup_iff.2 $ λ b hb, Sup_le $ λ a ha, let ⟨c, hct, hac⟩ := h a ha in hac.trans (hb hct)
-- We will generalize this to conditionally complete lattices in `cSup_singleton`.
theorem Sup_singleton {a : α} : Sup {a} = a :=
is_lub_singleton.Sup_eq
end
/--
Note that we rarely use `complete_semilattice_Inf`
(in fact, any such object is always a `complete_lattice`, so it's usually best to start there).
Nevertheless it is sometimes a useful intermediate step in constructions.
-/
@[ancestor partial_order has_Inf]
class complete_semilattice_Inf (α : Type*) extends partial_order α, has_Inf α :=
(Inf_le : ∀s, ∀a∈s, Inf s ≤ a)
(le_Inf : ∀s a, (∀b∈s, a ≤ b) → a ≤ Inf s)
section
variables [complete_semilattice_Inf α] {s t : set α} {a b : α}
@[ematch] theorem Inf_le : a ∈ s → Inf s ≤ a := complete_semilattice_Inf.Inf_le s a
theorem le_Inf : (∀b∈s, a ≤ b) → a ≤ Inf s := complete_semilattice_Inf.le_Inf s a
lemma is_glb_Inf (s : set α) : is_glb s (Inf s) := ⟨assume a, Inf_le, assume a, le_Inf⟩
lemma is_glb.Inf_eq (h : is_glb s a) : Inf s = a := (is_glb_Inf s).unique h
theorem Inf_le_of_le (hb : b ∈ s) (h : b ≤ a) : Inf s ≤ a :=
le_trans (Inf_le hb) h
theorem Inf_le_Inf (h : s ⊆ t) : Inf t ≤ Inf s :=
(is_glb_Inf s).mono (is_glb_Inf t) h
@[simp] theorem le_Inf_iff : a ≤ Inf s ↔ (∀b ∈ s, a ≤ b) :=
le_is_glb_iff (is_glb_Inf s)
lemma Inf_le_iff :
Inf s ≤ a ↔ (∀ b, (∀ x ∈ s, b ≤ x) → b ≤ a) :=
⟨λ h b hb, le_trans (le_Inf hb) h, λ hb, hb _ (λ x, Inf_le)⟩
theorem Inf_le_Inf_of_forall_exists_le (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, y ≤ x) : Inf t ≤ Inf s :=
le_of_forall_le begin
simp only [le_Inf_iff],
introv h₀ h₁,
rcases h _ h₁ with ⟨y,hy,hy'⟩,
solve_by_elim [le_trans _ hy']
end
-- We will generalize this to conditionally complete lattices in `cInf_singleton`.
theorem Inf_singleton {a : α} : Inf {a} = a :=
is_glb_singleton.Inf_eq
end
/-- A complete lattice is a bounded lattice which
has suprema and infima for every subset. -/
@[protect_proj, ancestor lattice complete_semilattice_Sup complete_semilattice_Inf has_top has_bot]
class complete_lattice (α : Type*) extends
lattice α, complete_semilattice_Sup α, complete_semilattice_Inf α, has_top α, has_bot α :=
(le_top : ∀ x : α, x ≤ ⊤)
(bot_le : ∀ x : α, ⊥ ≤ x)
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance complete_lattice.to_bounded_order [h : complete_lattice α] : bounded_order α :=
{ ..h }
/-- Create a `complete_lattice` from a `partial_order` and `Inf` function
that returns the greatest lower bound of a set. Usually this constructor provides
poor definitional equalities. If other fields are known explicitly, they should be
provided; for example, if `inf` is known explicitly, construct the `complete_lattice`
instance as
```
instance : complete_lattice my_T :=
{ inf := better_inf,
le_inf := ...,
inf_le_right := ...,
inf_le_left := ...
-- don't care to fix sup, Sup, bot, top
..complete_lattice_of_Inf my_T _ }
```
-/
def complete_lattice_of_Inf (α : Type*) [H1 : partial_order α]
[H2 : has_Inf α] (is_glb_Inf : ∀ s : set α, is_glb s (Inf s)) :
complete_lattice α :=
{ bot := Inf univ,
bot_le := λ x, (is_glb_Inf univ).1 trivial,
top := Inf ∅,
le_top := λ a, (is_glb_Inf ∅).2 $ by simp,
sup := λ a b, Inf {x | a ≤ x ∧ b ≤ x},
inf := λ a b, Inf {a, b},
le_inf := λ a b c hab hac, by { apply (is_glb_Inf _).2, simp [*] },
inf_le_right := λ a b, (is_glb_Inf _).1 $ mem_insert_of_mem _ $ mem_singleton _,
inf_le_left := λ a b, (is_glb_Inf _).1 $ mem_insert _ _,
sup_le := λ a b c hac hbc, (is_glb_Inf _).1 $ by simp [*],
le_sup_left := λ a b, (is_glb_Inf _).2 $ λ x, and.left,
le_sup_right := λ a b, (is_glb_Inf _).2 $ λ x, and.right,
le_Inf := λ s a ha, (is_glb_Inf s).2 ha,
Inf_le := λ s a ha, (is_glb_Inf s).1 ha,
Sup := λ s, Inf (upper_bounds s),
le_Sup := λ s a ha, (is_glb_Inf (upper_bounds s)).2 $ λ b hb, hb ha,
Sup_le := λ s a ha, (is_glb_Inf (upper_bounds s)).1 ha,
.. H1, .. H2 }
/--
Any `complete_semilattice_Inf` is in fact a `complete_lattice`.
Note that this construction has bad definitional properties:
see the doc-string on `complete_lattice_of_Inf`.
-/
def complete_lattice_of_complete_semilattice_Inf (α : Type*) [complete_semilattice_Inf α] :
complete_lattice α :=
complete_lattice_of_Inf α (λ s, is_glb_Inf s)
/-- Create a `complete_lattice` from a `partial_order` and `Sup` function
that returns the least upper bound of a set. Usually this constructor provides
poor definitional equalities. If other fields are known explicitly, they should be
provided; for example, if `inf` is known explicitly, construct the `complete_lattice`
instance as
```
instance : complete_lattice my_T :=
{ inf := better_inf,
le_inf := ...,
inf_le_right := ...,
inf_le_left := ...
-- don't care to fix sup, Inf, bot, top
..complete_lattice_of_Sup my_T _ }
```
-/
def complete_lattice_of_Sup (α : Type*) [H1 : partial_order α]
[H2 : has_Sup α] (is_lub_Sup : ∀ s : set α, is_lub s (Sup s)) :
complete_lattice α :=
{ top := Sup univ,
le_top := λ x, (is_lub_Sup univ).1 trivial,
bot := Sup ∅,
bot_le := λ x, (is_lub_Sup ∅).2 $ by simp,
sup := λ a b, Sup {a, b},
sup_le := λ a b c hac hbc, (is_lub_Sup _).2 (by simp [*]),
le_sup_left := λ a b, (is_lub_Sup _).1 $ mem_insert _ _,
le_sup_right := λ a b, (is_lub_Sup _).1 $ mem_insert_of_mem _ $ mem_singleton _,
inf := λ a b, Sup {x | x ≤ a ∧ x ≤ b},
le_inf := λ a b c hab hac, (is_lub_Sup _).1 $ by simp [*],
inf_le_left := λ a b, (is_lub_Sup _).2 (λ x, and.left),
inf_le_right := λ a b, (is_lub_Sup _).2 (λ x, and.right),
Inf := λ s, Sup (lower_bounds s),
Sup_le := λ s a ha, (is_lub_Sup s).2 ha,
le_Sup := λ s a ha, (is_lub_Sup s).1 ha,
Inf_le := λ s a ha, (is_lub_Sup (lower_bounds s)).2 (λ b hb, hb ha),
le_Inf := λ s a ha, (is_lub_Sup (lower_bounds s)).1 ha,
.. H1, .. H2 }
/--
Any `complete_semilattice_Sup` is in fact a `complete_lattice`.
Note that this construction has bad definitional properties:
see the doc-string on `complete_lattice_of_Sup`.
-/
def complete_lattice_of_complete_semilattice_Sup (α : Type*) [complete_semilattice_Sup α] :
complete_lattice α :=
complete_lattice_of_Sup α (λ s, is_lub_Sup s)
/-- A complete linear order is a linear order whose lattice structure is complete. -/
class complete_linear_order (α : Type*) extends complete_lattice α,
linear_order α renaming max → sup min → inf
namespace order_dual
variable (α)
instance [complete_lattice α] : complete_lattice (order_dual α) :=
{ le_Sup := @complete_lattice.Inf_le α _,
Sup_le := @complete_lattice.le_Inf α _,
Inf_le := @complete_lattice.le_Sup α _,
le_Inf := @complete_lattice.Sup_le α _,
.. order_dual.lattice α, ..order_dual.has_Sup α, ..order_dual.has_Inf α,
.. order_dual.bounded_order α }
instance [complete_linear_order α] : complete_linear_order (order_dual α) :=
{ .. order_dual.complete_lattice α, .. order_dual.linear_order α }
end order_dual
section
variables [complete_lattice α] {s t : set α} {a b : α}
theorem Inf_le_Sup (hs : s.nonempty) : Inf s ≤ Sup s :=
is_glb_le_is_lub (is_glb_Inf s) (is_lub_Sup s) hs
theorem Sup_union {s t : set α} : Sup (s ∪ t) = Sup s ⊔ Sup t :=
((is_lub_Sup s).union (is_lub_Sup t)).Sup_eq
theorem Sup_inter_le {s t : set α} : Sup (s ∩ t) ≤ Sup s ⊓ Sup t :=
Sup_le $ λ b hb, le_inf (le_Sup hb.1) (le_Sup hb.2)
/-
Sup_le (assume a ⟨a_s, a_t⟩, le_inf (le_Sup a_s) (le_Sup a_t))
-/
theorem Inf_union {s t : set α} : Inf (s ∪ t) = Inf s ⊓ Inf t :=
((is_glb_Inf s).union (is_glb_Inf t)).Inf_eq
theorem le_Inf_inter {s t : set α} : Inf s ⊔ Inf t ≤ Inf (s ∩ t) :=
@Sup_inter_le (order_dual α) _ _ _
@[simp] theorem Sup_empty : Sup ∅ = (⊥ : α) :=
(@is_lub_empty α _ _).Sup_eq
@[simp] theorem Inf_empty : Inf ∅ = (⊤ : α) :=
(@is_glb_empty α _ _).Inf_eq
@[simp] theorem Sup_univ : Sup univ = (⊤ : α) :=
(@is_lub_univ α _ _).Sup_eq
@[simp] theorem Inf_univ : Inf univ = (⊥ : α) :=
(@is_glb_univ α _ _).Inf_eq
-- TODO(Jeremy): get this automatically
@[simp] theorem Sup_insert {a : α} {s : set α} : Sup (insert a s) = a ⊔ Sup s :=
((is_lub_Sup s).insert a).Sup_eq
@[simp] theorem Inf_insert {a : α} {s : set α} : Inf (insert a s) = a ⊓ Inf s :=
((is_glb_Inf s).insert a).Inf_eq
theorem Sup_le_Sup_of_subset_insert_bot (h : s ⊆ insert ⊥ t) : Sup s ≤ Sup t :=
le_trans (Sup_le_Sup h) (le_of_eq (trans Sup_insert bot_sup_eq))
theorem Inf_le_Inf_of_subset_insert_top (h : s ⊆ insert ⊤ t) : Inf t ≤ Inf s :=
le_trans (le_of_eq (trans top_inf_eq.symm Inf_insert.symm)) (Inf_le_Inf h)
theorem Sup_pair {a b : α} : Sup {a, b} = a ⊔ b :=
(@is_lub_pair α _ a b).Sup_eq
theorem Inf_pair {a b : α} : Inf {a, b} = a ⊓ b :=
(@is_glb_pair α _ a b).Inf_eq
@[simp] theorem Inf_eq_top : Inf s = ⊤ ↔ (∀a∈s, a = ⊤) :=
iff.intro
(assume h a ha, top_unique $ h ▸ Inf_le ha)
(assume h, top_unique $ le_Inf $ assume a ha, top_le_iff.2 $ h a ha)
lemma eq_singleton_top_of_Inf_eq_top_of_nonempty {s : set α}
(h_inf : Inf s = ⊤) (hne : s.nonempty) : s = {⊤} :=
by { rw set.eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem, rw Inf_eq_top at h_inf, exact ⟨hne, h_inf⟩, }
@[simp] theorem Sup_eq_bot : Sup s = ⊥ ↔ (∀a∈s, a = ⊥) :=
@Inf_eq_top (order_dual α) _ _
lemma eq_singleton_bot_of_Sup_eq_bot_of_nonempty {s : set α}
(h_sup : Sup s = ⊥) (hne : s.nonempty) : s = {⊥} :=
by { rw set.eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem, rw Sup_eq_bot at h_sup, exact ⟨hne, h_sup⟩, }
/--Introduction rule to prove that `b` is the supremum of `s`: it suffices to check that `b`
is larger than all elements of `s`, and that this is not the case of any `w < b`.
See `cSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt` for a version in conditionally complete
lattices. -/
theorem Sup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt (_ : ∀a∈s, a ≤ b)
(H : ∀w, w < b → (∃a∈s, w < a)) : Sup s = b :=
have h : (Sup s < b) ∨ (Sup s = b) := lt_or_eq_of_le (Sup_le ‹∀a∈s, a ≤ b›),
have ¬(Sup s < b) :=
assume: Sup s < b,
let ⟨a, _, _⟩ := (H (Sup s) ‹Sup s < b›) in /- a ∈ s, Sup s < a-/
have Sup s < Sup s := lt_of_lt_of_le ‹Sup s < a› (le_Sup ‹a ∈ s›),
show false, from lt_irrefl _ this,
show Sup s = b, from or.resolve_left h this
/--Introduction rule to prove that `b` is the infimum of `s`: it suffices to check that `b`
is smaller than all elements of `s`, and that this is not the case of any `w > b`.
See `cInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt` for a version in conditionally complete
lattices. -/
theorem Inf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt (_ : ∀a∈s, b ≤ a)
(H : ∀w, b < w → (∃a∈s, a < w)) : Inf s = b :=
@Sup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt (order_dual α) _ _ ‹_› ‹_› ‹_›
end
section complete_linear_order
variables [complete_linear_order α] {s t : set α} {a b : α}
lemma Inf_lt_iff : Inf s < b ↔ (∃a∈s, a < b) :=
is_glb_lt_iff (is_glb_Inf s)
lemma lt_Sup_iff : b < Sup s ↔ (∃a∈s, b < a) :=
lt_is_lub_iff (is_lub_Sup s)
lemma Sup_eq_top : Sup s = ⊤ ↔ (∀b<⊤, ∃a∈s, b < a) :=
iff.intro
(assume (h : Sup s = ⊤) b hb, by rwa [←h, lt_Sup_iff] at hb)
(assume h, top_unique $ le_of_not_gt $ assume h',
let ⟨a, ha, h⟩ := h _ h' in
lt_irrefl a $ lt_of_le_of_lt (le_Sup ha) h)
lemma Inf_eq_bot : Inf s = ⊥ ↔ (∀b>⊥, ∃a∈s, a < b) :=
@Sup_eq_top (order_dual α) _ _
lemma lt_supr_iff {f : ι → α} : a < supr f ↔ (∃i, a < f i) :=
lt_Sup_iff.trans exists_range_iff
lemma infi_lt_iff {f : ι → α} : infi f < a ↔ (∃i, f i < a) :=
Inf_lt_iff.trans exists_range_iff
end complete_linear_order
/-
### supr & infi
-/
section
variables [complete_lattice α] {s t : ι → α} {a b : α}
-- TODO: this declaration gives error when starting smt state
--@[ematch]
theorem le_supr (s : ι → α) (i : ι) : s i ≤ supr s :=
le_Sup ⟨i, rfl⟩
@[ematch] theorem le_supr' (s : ι → α) (i : ι) : (: s i ≤ supr s :) :=
le_Sup ⟨i, rfl⟩
/- TODO: this version would be more powerful, but, alas, the pattern matcher
doesn't accept it.
@[ematch] theorem le_supr' (s : ι → α) (i : ι) : (: s i :) ≤ (: supr s :) :=
le_Sup ⟨i, rfl⟩
-/
lemma is_lub_supr : is_lub (range s) (⨆j, s j) := is_lub_Sup _
lemma is_lub.supr_eq (h : is_lub (range s) a) : (⨆j, s j) = a := h.Sup_eq
lemma is_glb_infi : is_glb (range s) (⨅j, s j) := is_glb_Inf _
lemma is_glb.infi_eq (h : is_glb (range s) a) : (⨅j, s j) = a := h.Inf_eq
theorem le_supr_of_le (i : ι) (h : a ≤ s i) : a ≤ supr s :=
le_trans h (le_supr _ i)
theorem le_bsupr {p : ι → Prop} {f : Π i (h : p i), α} (i : ι) (hi : p i) :
f i hi ≤ ⨆ i hi, f i hi :=
le_supr_of_le i $ le_supr (f i) hi
theorem le_bsupr_of_le {p : ι → Prop} {f : Π i (h : p i), α} (i : ι) (hi : p i) (h : a ≤ f i hi) :
a ≤ ⨆ i hi, f i hi :=
le_trans h (le_bsupr i hi)
theorem supr_le (h : ∀i, s i ≤ a) : supr s ≤ a :=
Sup_le $ assume b ⟨i, eq⟩, eq ▸ h i
theorem bsupr_le {p : ι → Prop} {f : Π i (h : p i), α} (h : ∀ i hi, f i hi ≤ a) :
(⨆ i (hi : p i), f i hi) ≤ a :=
supr_le $ λ i, supr_le $ h i
theorem bsupr_le_supr (p : ι → Prop) (f : ι → α) : (⨆ i (H : p i), f i) ≤ ⨆ i, f i :=
bsupr_le (λ i hi, le_supr f i)
theorem supr_le_supr (h : ∀i, s i ≤ t i) : supr s ≤ supr t :=
supr_le $ assume i, le_supr_of_le i (h i)
theorem supr_le_supr2 {t : ι₂ → α} (h : ∀i, ∃j, s i ≤ t j) : supr s ≤ supr t :=
supr_le $ assume j, exists.elim (h j) le_supr_of_le
theorem bsupr_le_bsupr {p : ι → Prop} {f g : Π i (hi : p i), α} (h : ∀ i hi, f i hi ≤ g i hi) :
(⨆ i hi, f i hi) ≤ ⨆ i hi, g i hi :=
bsupr_le $ λ i hi, le_trans (h i hi) (le_bsupr i hi)
theorem supr_le_supr_const (h : ι → ι₂) : (⨆ i:ι, a) ≤ (⨆ j:ι₂, a) :=
supr_le $ le_supr _ ∘ h
theorem bsupr_le_bsupr' {p q : ι → Prop} (hpq : ∀ i, p i → q i) {f : ι → α} :
(⨆ i (hpi : p i), f i) ≤ ⨆ i (hqi : q i), f i :=
supr_le_supr $ λ i, supr_le_supr_const (hpq i)
@[simp] theorem supr_le_iff : supr s ≤ a ↔ (∀i, s i ≤ a) :=
(is_lub_le_iff is_lub_supr).trans forall_range_iff
theorem supr_lt_iff : supr s < a ↔ ∃ b < a, ∀ i, s i ≤ b :=
⟨λ h, ⟨supr s, h, λ i, le_supr s i⟩, λ ⟨b, hba, hsb⟩, (supr_le hsb).trans_lt hba⟩
theorem Sup_eq_supr {s : set α} : Sup s = (⨆a ∈ s, a) :=
le_antisymm
(Sup_le $ assume b h, le_supr_of_le b $ le_supr _ h)
(supr_le $ assume b, supr_le $ assume h, le_Sup h)
lemma Sup_eq_supr' {α} [has_Sup α] (s : set α) : Sup s = ⨆ x : s, (x : α) :=
by rw [supr, subtype.range_coe]
lemma Sup_sUnion {s : set (set α)} :
Sup (⋃₀ s) = ⨆ (t ∈ s), Sup t :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ apply Sup_le (λ b hb, _),
rcases hb with ⟨t, ts, bt⟩,
apply le_trans _ (le_supr _ t),
exact le_trans (le_Sup bt) (le_supr _ ts), },
{ apply supr_le (λ t, _),
exact supr_le (λ ts, Sup_le_Sup (λ x xt, ⟨t, ts, xt⟩)) }
end
lemma le_supr_iff : (a ≤ supr s) ↔ (∀ b, (∀ i, s i ≤ b) → a ≤ b) :=
⟨λ h b hb, le_trans h (supr_le hb), λ h, h _ $ λ i, le_supr s i⟩
lemma monotone.le_map_supr [complete_lattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : monotone f) :
(⨆ i, f (s i)) ≤ f (supr s) :=
supr_le $ λ i, hf $ le_supr _ _
lemma monotone.le_map_supr2 [complete_lattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : monotone f)
{ι' : ι → Sort*} (s : Π i, ι' i → α) :
(⨆ i (h : ι' i), f (s i h)) ≤ f (⨆ i (h : ι' i), s i h) :=
calc (⨆ i h, f (s i h)) ≤ (⨆ i, f (⨆ h, s i h)) :
supr_le_supr $ λ i, hf.le_map_supr
... ≤ f (⨆ i (h : ι' i), s i h) : hf.le_map_supr
lemma monotone.le_map_Sup [complete_lattice β] {s : set α} {f : α → β} (hf : monotone f) :
(⨆a∈s, f a) ≤ f (Sup s) :=
by rw [Sup_eq_supr]; exact hf.le_map_supr2 _
lemma order_iso.map_supr [complete_lattice β] (f : α ≃o β) (x : ι → α) :
f (⨆ i, x i) = ⨆ i, f (x i) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ f.surjective.forall.2 $ λ x,
by simp only [f.le_iff_le, supr_le_iff]
lemma order_iso.map_Sup [complete_lattice β] (f : α ≃o β) (s : set α) :
f (Sup s) = ⨆ a ∈ s, f a :=
by simp only [Sup_eq_supr, order_iso.map_supr]
lemma supr_comp_le {ι' : Sort*} (f : ι' → α) (g : ι → ι') :
(⨆ x, f (g x)) ≤ ⨆ y, f y :=
supr_le_supr2 $ λ x, ⟨_, le_rfl⟩
lemma monotone.supr_comp_eq [preorder β] {f : β → α} (hf : monotone f)
{s : ι → β} (hs : ∀ x, ∃ i, x ≤ s i) :
(⨆ x, f (s x)) = ⨆ y, f y :=
le_antisymm (supr_comp_le _ _) (supr_le_supr2 $ λ x, (hs x).imp $ λ i hi, hf hi)
lemma function.surjective.supr_comp {α : Type*} [has_Sup α] {f : ι → ι₂}
(hf : surjective f) (g : ι₂ → α) :
(⨆ x, g (f x)) = ⨆ y, g y :=
by simp only [supr, hf.range_comp]
lemma supr_congr {α : Type*} [has_Sup α] {f : ι → α} {g : ι₂ → α} (h : ι → ι₂)
(h1 : surjective h) (h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : (⨆ x, f x) = ⨆ y, g y :=
by { convert h1.supr_comp g, exact (funext h2).symm }
-- TODO: finish doesn't do well here.
@[congr] theorem supr_congr_Prop {α : Type*} [has_Sup α] {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → α} {f₂ : q → α}
(pq : p ↔ q) (f : ∀x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : supr f₁ = supr f₂ :=
begin
have := propext pq, subst this,
congr' with x,
apply f
end
theorem infi_le (s : ι → α) (i : ι) : infi s ≤ s i :=
Inf_le ⟨i, rfl⟩
@[ematch] theorem infi_le' (s : ι → α) (i : ι) : (: infi s ≤ s i :) :=
Inf_le ⟨i, rfl⟩
theorem infi_le_of_le (i : ι) (h : s i ≤ a) : infi s ≤ a :=
le_trans (infi_le _ i) h
theorem binfi_le {p : ι → Prop} {f : Π i (hi : p i), α} (i : ι) (hi : p i) :
(⨅ i hi, f i hi) ≤ f i hi :=
infi_le_of_le i $ infi_le (f i) hi
theorem binfi_le_of_le {p : ι → Prop} {f : Π i (hi : p i), α} (i : ι) (hi : p i) (h : f i hi ≤ a) :
(⨅ i hi, f i hi) ≤ a :=
le_trans (binfi_le i hi) h
theorem le_infi (h : ∀i, a ≤ s i) : a ≤ infi s :=
le_Inf $ assume b ⟨i, eq⟩, eq ▸ h i
theorem le_binfi {p : ι → Prop} {f : Π i (h : p i), α} (h : ∀ i hi, a ≤ f i hi) :
a ≤ ⨅ i hi, f i hi :=
le_infi $ λ i, le_infi $ h i
theorem infi_le_binfi (p : ι → Prop) (f : ι → α) : (⨅ i, f i) ≤ ⨅ i (H : p i), f i :=
le_binfi (λ i hi, infi_le f i)
theorem infi_le_infi (h : ∀i, s i ≤ t i) : infi s ≤ infi t :=
le_infi $ assume i, infi_le_of_le i (h i)
theorem infi_le_infi2 {t : ι₂ → α} (h : ∀j, ∃i, s i ≤ t j) : infi s ≤ infi t :=
le_infi $ assume j, exists.elim (h j) infi_le_of_le
theorem binfi_le_binfi {p : ι → Prop} {f g : Π i (h : p i), α} (h : ∀ i hi, f i hi ≤ g i hi) :
(⨅ i hi, f i hi) ≤ ⨅ i hi, g i hi :=
le_binfi $ λ i hi, le_trans (binfi_le i hi) (h i hi)
theorem infi_le_infi_const (h : ι₂ → ι) : (⨅ i:ι, a) ≤ (⨅ j:ι₂, a) :=
le_infi $ infi_le _ ∘ h
@[simp] theorem le_infi_iff : a ≤ infi s ↔ (∀i, a ≤ s i) :=
⟨assume : a ≤ infi s, assume i, le_trans this (infi_le _ _), le_infi⟩
theorem Inf_eq_infi {s : set α} : Inf s = (⨅a ∈ s, a) :=
@Sup_eq_supr (order_dual α) _ _
theorem Inf_eq_infi' {α} [has_Inf α] (s : set α) : Inf s = ⨅ a : s, a :=
@Sup_eq_supr' (order_dual α) _ _
lemma monotone.map_infi_le [complete_lattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : monotone f) :
f (infi s) ≤ (⨅ i, f (s i)) :=
le_infi $ λ i, hf $ infi_le _ _
lemma monotone.map_infi2_le [complete_lattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : monotone f)
{ι' : ι → Sort*} (s : Π i, ι' i → α) :
f (⨅ i (h : ι' i), s i h) ≤ (⨅ i (h : ι' i), f (s i h)) :=
@monotone.le_map_supr2 (order_dual α) (order_dual β) _ _ _ f hf.dual _ _
lemma monotone.map_Inf_le [complete_lattice β] {s : set α} {f : α → β} (hf : monotone f) :
f (Inf s) ≤ ⨅ a∈s, f a :=
by rw [Inf_eq_infi]; exact hf.map_infi2_le _
lemma order_iso.map_infi [complete_lattice β] (f : α ≃o β) (x : ι → α) :
f (⨅ i, x i) = ⨅ i, f (x i) :=
order_iso.map_supr f.dual _
lemma order_iso.map_Inf [complete_lattice β] (f : α ≃o β) (s : set α) :
f (Inf s) = ⨅ a ∈ s, f a :=
order_iso.map_Sup f.dual _
lemma le_infi_comp {ι' : Sort*} (f : ι' → α) (g : ι → ι') :
(⨅ y, f y) ≤ ⨅ x, f (g x) :=
infi_le_infi2 $ λ x, ⟨_, le_rfl⟩
lemma monotone.infi_comp_eq [preorder β] {f : β → α} (hf : monotone f)
{s : ι → β} (hs : ∀ x, ∃ i, s i ≤ x) :
(⨅ x, f (s x)) = ⨅ y, f y :=
le_antisymm (infi_le_infi2 $ λ x, (hs x).imp $ λ i hi, hf hi) (le_infi_comp _ _)
lemma function.surjective.infi_comp {α : Type*} [has_Inf α] {f : ι → ι₂}
(hf : surjective f) (g : ι₂ → α) :
(⨅ x, g (f x)) = ⨅ y, g y :=
@function.surjective.supr_comp _ _ (order_dual α) _ f hf g
lemma infi_congr {α : Type*} [has_Inf α] {f : ι → α} {g : ι₂ → α} (h : ι → ι₂)
(h1 : surjective h) (h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : (⨅ x, f x) = ⨅ y, g y :=
@supr_congr _ _ (order_dual α) _ _ _ h h1 h2
@[congr] theorem infi_congr_Prop {α : Type*} [has_Inf α] {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → α} {f₂ : q → α}
(pq : p ↔ q) (f : ∀x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : infi f₁ = infi f₂ :=
@supr_congr_Prop (order_dual α) _ p q f₁ f₂ pq f
lemma supr_const_le {x : α} : (⨆ (h : ι), x) ≤ x :=
supr_le (λ _, le_rfl)
lemma le_infi_const {x : α} : x ≤ (⨅ (h : ι), x) :=
le_infi (λ _, le_rfl)
-- We will generalize this to conditionally complete lattices in `cinfi_const`.
theorem infi_const [nonempty ι] {a : α} : (⨅ b:ι, a) = a :=
by rw [infi, range_const, Inf_singleton]
-- We will generalize this to conditionally complete lattices in `csupr_const`.
theorem supr_const [nonempty ι] {a : α} : (⨆ b:ι, a) = a :=
@infi_const (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
@[simp] lemma infi_top : (⨅i:ι, ⊤ : α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique $ le_infi $ assume i, le_rfl
@[simp] lemma supr_bot : (⨆i:ι, ⊥ : α) = ⊥ :=
@infi_top (order_dual α) _ _
@[simp] lemma infi_eq_top : infi s = ⊤ ↔ (∀i, s i = ⊤) :=
Inf_eq_top.trans forall_range_iff
@[simp] lemma supr_eq_bot : supr s = ⊥ ↔ (∀i, s i = ⊥) :=
Sup_eq_bot.trans forall_range_iff
@[simp] lemma infi_pos {p : Prop} {f : p → α} (hp : p) : (⨅ h : p, f h) = f hp :=
le_antisymm (infi_le _ _) (le_infi $ assume h, le_rfl)
@[simp] lemma infi_neg {p : Prop} {f : p → α} (hp : ¬ p) : (⨅ h : p, f h) = ⊤ :=
le_antisymm le_top $ le_infi $ assume h, (hp h).elim
@[simp] lemma supr_pos {p : Prop} {f : p → α} (hp : p) : (⨆ h : p, f h) = f hp :=
le_antisymm (supr_le $ assume h, le_rfl) (le_supr _ _)
@[simp] lemma supr_neg {p : Prop} {f : p → α} (hp : ¬ p) : (⨆ h : p, f h) = ⊥ :=
le_antisymm (supr_le $ assume h, (hp h).elim) bot_le
/--Introduction rule to prove that `b` is the supremum of `f`: it suffices to check that `b`
is larger than `f i` for all `i`, and that this is not the case of any `w<b`.
See `csupr_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt` for a version in conditionally complete
lattices. -/
theorem supr_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt {f : ι → α} (h₁ : ∀ i, f i ≤ b)
(h₂ : ∀ w, w < b → (∃ i, w < f i)) : (⨆ (i : ι), f i) = b :=
Sup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt (forall_range_iff.mpr h₁)
(λ w hw, exists_range_iff.mpr $ h₂ w hw)
/--Introduction rule to prove that `b` is the infimum of `f`: it suffices to check that `b`
is smaller than `f i` for all `i`, and that this is not the case of any `w>b`.
See `cinfi_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt` for a version in conditionally complete
lattices. -/
theorem infi_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt {f : ι → α} (h₁ : ∀ i, b ≤ f i)
(h₂ : ∀ w, b < w → (∃ i, f i < w)) : (⨅ (i : ι), f i) = b :=
@supr_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt (order_dual α) _ _ _ ‹_› ‹_› ‹_›
lemma supr_eq_dif {p : Prop} [decidable p] (a : p → α) :
(⨆h:p, a h) = (if h : p then a h else ⊥) :=
by by_cases p; simp [h]
lemma supr_eq_if {p : Prop} [decidable p] (a : α) :
(⨆h:p, a) = (if p then a else ⊥) :=
supr_eq_dif (λ _, a)
lemma infi_eq_dif {p : Prop} [decidable p] (a : p → α) :
(⨅h:p, a h) = (if h : p then a h else ⊤) :=
@supr_eq_dif (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
lemma infi_eq_if {p : Prop} [decidable p] (a : α) :
(⨅h:p, a) = (if p then a else ⊤) :=
infi_eq_dif (λ _, a)
-- TODO: should this be @[simp]?
theorem infi_comm {f : ι → ι₂ → α} : (⨅i, ⨅j, f i j) = (⨅j, ⨅i, f i j) :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume i, le_infi $ assume j, infi_le_of_le j $ infi_le _ i)
(le_infi $ assume j, le_infi $ assume i, infi_le_of_le i $ infi_le _ j)
/- TODO: this is strange. In the proof below, we get exactly the desired
among the equalities, but close does not get it.
begin
apply @le_antisymm,
simp, intros,
begin [smt]
ematch, ematch, ematch, trace_state, have := le_refl (f i_1 i),
trace_state, close
end
end
-/
-- TODO: should this be @[simp]?
theorem supr_comm {f : ι → ι₂ → α} : (⨆i, ⨆j, f i j) = (⨆j, ⨆i, f i j) :=
@infi_comm (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
@[simp] theorem infi_infi_eq_left {b : β} {f : Πx:β, x = b → α} :
(⨅x, ⨅h:x = b, f x h) = f b rfl :=
le_antisymm
(infi_le_of_le b $ infi_le _ rfl)
(le_infi $ assume b', le_infi $ assume eq, match b', eq with ._, rfl := le_rfl end)
@[simp] theorem infi_infi_eq_right {b : β} {f : Πx:β, b = x → α} :
(⨅x, ⨅h:b = x, f x h) = f b rfl :=
le_antisymm
(infi_le_of_le b $ infi_le _ rfl)
(le_infi $ assume b', le_infi $ assume eq, match b', eq with ._, rfl := le_rfl end)
@[simp] theorem supr_supr_eq_left {b : β} {f : Πx:β, x = b → α} :
(⨆x, ⨆h : x = b, f x h) = f b rfl :=
@infi_infi_eq_left (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
@[simp] theorem supr_supr_eq_right {b : β} {f : Πx:β, b = x → α} :
(⨆x, ⨆h : b = x, f x h) = f b rfl :=
@infi_infi_eq_right (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
attribute [ematch] le_refl
theorem infi_subtype {p : ι → Prop} {f : subtype p → α} : (⨅ x, f x) = (⨅ i (h:p i), f ⟨i, h⟩) :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume i, le_infi $ assume : p i, infi_le _ _)
(le_infi $ assume ⟨i, h⟩, infi_le_of_le i $ infi_le _ _)
lemma infi_subtype' {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α} :
(⨅ i (h : p i), f i h) = (⨅ x : subtype p, f x x.property) :=
(@infi_subtype _ _ _ p (λ x, f x.val x.property)).symm
lemma infi_subtype'' {ι} (s : set ι) (f : ι → α) :
(⨅ i : s, f i) = ⨅ (t : ι) (H : t ∈ s), f t :=
infi_subtype
theorem infi_inf_eq {f g : ι → α} : (⨅ x, f x ⊓ g x) = (⨅ x, f x) ⊓ (⨅ x, g x) :=
le_antisymm
(le_inf
(le_infi $ assume i, infi_le_of_le i inf_le_left)
(le_infi $ assume i, infi_le_of_le i inf_le_right))
(le_infi $ assume i, le_inf
(inf_le_of_left_le $ infi_le _ _)
(inf_le_of_right_le $ infi_le _ _))
/- TODO: here is another example where more flexible pattern matching
might help.
begin
apply @le_antisymm,
safe, pose h := f a ⊓ g a, begin [smt] ematch, ematch end
end
-/
lemma infi_inf [h : nonempty ι] {f : ι → α} {a : α} : (⨅x, f x) ⊓ a = (⨅ x, f x ⊓ a) :=
by rw [infi_inf_eq, infi_const]
lemma inf_infi [nonempty ι] {f : ι → α} {a : α} : a ⊓ (⨅x, f x) = (⨅ x, a ⊓ f x) :=
by rw [inf_comm, infi_inf]; simp [inf_comm]
lemma binfi_inf {p : ι → Prop} {f : Π i (hi : p i), α} {a : α} (h : ∃ i, p i) :
(⨅i (h : p i), f i h) ⊓ a = (⨅ i (h : p i), f i h ⊓ a) :=
by haveI : nonempty {i // p i} := (let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h in ⟨⟨i, hi⟩⟩);
rw [infi_subtype', infi_subtype', infi_inf]
lemma inf_binfi {p : ι → Prop} {f : Π i (hi : p i), α} {a : α} (h : ∃ i, p i) :
a ⊓ (⨅i (h : p i), f i h) = (⨅ i (h : p i), a ⊓ f i h) :=
by simpa only [inf_comm] using binfi_inf h
theorem supr_sup_eq {f g : ι → α} : (⨆ x, f x ⊔ g x) = (⨆ x, f x) ⊔ (⨆ x, g x) :=
@infi_inf_eq (order_dual α) ι _ _ _
lemma supr_sup [h : nonempty ι] {f : ι → α} {a : α} : (⨆ x, f x) ⊔ a = (⨆ x, f x ⊔ a) :=
@infi_inf (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _
lemma sup_supr [nonempty ι] {f : ι → α} {a : α} : a ⊔ (⨆ x, f x) = (⨆ x, a ⊔ f x) :=
@inf_infi (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _
/-! ### `supr` and `infi` under `Prop` -/
@[simp] theorem infi_false {s : false → α} : infi s = ⊤ :=
le_antisymm le_top (le_infi $ assume i, false.elim i)
@[simp] theorem supr_false {s : false → α} : supr s = ⊥ :=
le_antisymm (supr_le $ assume i, false.elim i) bot_le
theorem infi_true {s : true → α} : infi s = s trivial :=
infi_pos trivial
theorem supr_true {s : true → α} : supr s = s trivial :=
supr_pos trivial
@[simp] theorem infi_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → α} :
(⨅ x, f x) = (⨅ i, ⨅ h:p i, f ⟨i, h⟩) :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume i, le_infi $ assume : p i, infi_le _ _)
(le_infi $ assume ⟨i, h⟩, infi_le_of_le i $ infi_le _ _)
@[simp] theorem supr_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → α} :
(⨆ x, f x) = (⨆ i, ⨆ h:p i, f ⟨i, h⟩) :=
@infi_exists (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
theorem infi_and {p q : Prop} {s : p ∧ q → α} : infi s = (⨅ h₁ h₂, s ⟨h₁, h₂⟩) :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume i, le_infi $ assume j, infi_le _ _)
(le_infi $ assume ⟨i, h⟩, infi_le_of_le i $ infi_le _ _)
/-- The symmetric case of `infi_and`, useful for rewriting into a infimum over a conjunction -/
lemma infi_and' {p q : Prop} {s : p → q → α} :
(⨅ (h₁ : p) (h₂ : q), s h₁ h₂) = ⨅ (h : p ∧ q), s h.1 h.2 :=
by { symmetry, exact infi_and }
theorem supr_and {p q : Prop} {s : p ∧ q → α} : supr s = (⨆ h₁ h₂, s ⟨h₁, h₂⟩) :=
@infi_and (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
/-- The symmetric case of `supr_and`, useful for rewriting into a supremum over a conjunction -/
lemma supr_and' {p q : Prop} {s : p → q → α} :
(⨆ (h₁ : p) (h₂ : q), s h₁ h₂) = ⨆ (h : p ∧ q), s h.1 h.2 :=
by { symmetry, exact supr_and }
theorem infi_or {p q : Prop} {s : p ∨ q → α} :
infi s = (⨅ h : p, s (or.inl h)) ⊓ (⨅ h : q, s (or.inr h)) :=
le_antisymm
(le_inf
(infi_le_infi2 $ assume j, ⟨_, le_rfl⟩)
(infi_le_infi2 $ assume j, ⟨_, le_rfl⟩))
(le_infi $ assume i, match i with
| or.inl i := inf_le_of_left_le $ infi_le _ _
| or.inr j := inf_le_of_right_le $ infi_le _ _
end)
theorem supr_or {p q : Prop} {s : p ∨ q → α} :
(⨆ x, s x) = (⨆ i, s (or.inl i)) ⊔ (⨆ j, s (or.inr j)) :=
@infi_or (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
section
variables (p : ι → Prop) [decidable_pred p]
lemma supr_dite (f : Π i, p i → α) (g : Π i, ¬p i → α) :
(⨆ i, if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⨆ i (h : p i), f i h) ⊔ (⨆ i (h : ¬ p i), g i h) :=
begin
rw ←supr_sup_eq,
congr' 1 with i,
split_ifs with h;
simp [h],
end
lemma supr_ite (f g : ι → α) :
(⨆ i, if p i then f i else g i) = (⨆ i (h : p i), f i) ⊔ (⨆ i (h : ¬ p i), g i) :=
supr_dite _ _ _
lemma infi_dite (f : Π i, p i → α) (g : Π i, ¬p i → α) :
(⨅ i, if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⨅ i (h : p i), f i h) ⊓ (⨅ i (h : ¬ p i), g i h) :=
supr_dite p (show Π i, p i → order_dual α, from f) g
lemma infi_ite (f g : ι → α) :
(⨅ i, if p i then f i else g i) = (⨅ i (h : p i), f i) ⊓ (⨅ i (h : ¬ p i), g i) :=
infi_dite _ _ _
end
lemma Sup_range {α : Type*} [has_Sup α] {f : ι → α} : Sup (range f) = supr f := rfl
lemma Inf_range {α : Type*} [has_Inf α] {f : ι → α} : Inf (range f) = infi f := rfl
lemma supr_range' {α} [has_Sup α] (g : β → α) (f : ι → β) :
(⨆ b : range f, g b) = ⨆ i, g (f i) :=
by rw [supr, supr, ← image_eq_range, ← range_comp]
lemma infi_range' {α} [has_Inf α] (g : β → α) (f : ι → β) :
(⨅ b : range f, g b) = ⨅ i, g (f i) :=
@supr_range' _ _ (order_dual α) _ _ _
lemma infi_range {g : β → α} {f : ι → β} : (⨅b∈range f, g b) = (⨅i, g (f i)) :=
by rw [← infi_subtype'', infi_range']
lemma supr_range {g : β → α} {f : ι → β} : (⨆b∈range f, g b) = (⨆i, g (f i)) :=
@infi_range (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _
theorem Inf_image' {α} [has_Inf α] {s : set β} {f : β → α} :
Inf (f '' s) = (⨅ a : s, f a) :=
by rw [infi, image_eq_range]
theorem Sup_image' {α} [has_Sup α] {s : set β} {f : β → α} :
Sup (f '' s) = (⨆ a : s, f a) :=
@Inf_image' _ (order_dual α) _ _ _
theorem Inf_image {s : set β} {f : β → α} : Inf (f '' s) = (⨅ a ∈ s, f a) :=
by rw [← infi_subtype'', Inf_image']
theorem Sup_image {s : set β} {f : β → α} : Sup (f '' s) = (⨆ a ∈ s, f a) :=
@Inf_image (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
/-
### supr and infi under set constructions
-/
theorem infi_emptyset {f : β → α} : (⨅ x ∈ (∅ : set β), f x) = ⊤ :=
by simp
theorem supr_emptyset {f : β → α} : (⨆ x ∈ (∅ : set β), f x) = ⊥ :=
by simp
theorem infi_univ {f : β → α} : (⨅ x ∈ (univ : set β), f x) = (⨅ x, f x) :=
by simp
theorem supr_univ {f : β → α} : (⨆ x ∈ (univ : set β), f x) = (⨆ x, f x) :=
by simp
theorem infi_union {f : β → α} {s t : set β} : (⨅ x ∈ s ∪ t, f x) = (⨅x∈s, f x) ⊓ (⨅x∈t, f x) :=
by simp only [← infi_inf_eq, infi_or]
lemma infi_split (f : β → α) (p : β → Prop) :
(⨅ i, f i) = (⨅ i (h : p i), f i) ⊓ (⨅ i (h : ¬ p i), f i) :=
by simpa [classical.em] using @infi_union _ _ _ f {i | p i} {i | ¬ p i}
lemma infi_split_single (f : β → α) (i₀ : β) :
(⨅ i, f i) = f i₀ ⊓ (⨅ i (h : i ≠ i₀), f i) :=
by convert infi_split _ _; simp
theorem infi_le_infi_of_subset {f : β → α} {s t : set β} (h : s ⊆ t) :
(⨅ x ∈ t, f x) ≤ (⨅ x ∈ s, f x) :=
by rw [(union_eq_self_of_subset_left h).symm, infi_union]; exact inf_le_left
theorem supr_union {f : β → α} {s t : set β} : (⨆ x ∈ s ∪ t, f x) = (⨆x∈s, f x) ⊔ (⨆x∈t, f x) :=
@infi_union (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _
lemma supr_split (f : β → α) (p : β → Prop) :
(⨆ i, f i) = (⨆ i (h : p i), f i) ⊔ (⨆ i (h : ¬ p i), f i) :=
@infi_split (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
lemma supr_split_single (f : β → α) (i₀ : β) :
(⨆ i, f i) = f i₀ ⊔ (⨆ i (h : i ≠ i₀), f i) :=
@infi_split_single (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
theorem supr_le_supr_of_subset {f : β → α} {s t : set β} (h : s ⊆ t) :
(⨆ x ∈ s, f x) ≤ (⨆ x ∈ t, f x) :=
@infi_le_infi_of_subset (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _ h
theorem infi_insert {f : β → α} {s : set β} {b : β} :
(⨅ x ∈ insert b s, f x) = f b ⊓ (⨅x∈s, f x) :=
eq.trans infi_union $ congr_arg (λx:α, x ⊓ (⨅x∈s, f x)) infi_infi_eq_left
theorem supr_insert {f : β → α} {s : set β} {b : β} :
(⨆ x ∈ insert b s, f x) = f b ⊔ (⨆x∈s, f x) :=
eq.trans supr_union $ congr_arg (λx:α, x ⊔ (⨆x∈s, f x)) supr_supr_eq_left
theorem infi_singleton {f : β → α} {b : β} : (⨅ x ∈ (singleton b : set β), f x) = f b :=
by simp
theorem infi_pair {f : β → α} {a b : β} : (⨅ x ∈ ({a, b} : set β), f x) = f a ⊓ f b :=
by rw [infi_insert, infi_singleton]
theorem supr_singleton {f : β → α} {b : β} : (⨆ x ∈ (singleton b : set β), f x) = f b :=
@infi_singleton (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
theorem supr_pair {f : β → α} {a b : β} : (⨆ x ∈ ({a, b} : set β), f x) = f a ⊔ f b :=
by rw [supr_insert, supr_singleton]
lemma infi_image {γ} {f : β → γ} {g : γ → α} {t : set β} :
(⨅ c ∈ f '' t, g c) = (⨅ b ∈ t, g (f b)) :=
by rw [← Inf_image, ← Inf_image, ← image_comp]
lemma supr_image {γ} {f : β → γ} {g : γ → α} {t : set β} :
(⨆ c ∈ f '' t, g c) = (⨆ b ∈ t, g (f b)) :=
@infi_image (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _ _
theorem supr_extend_bot {e : ι → β} (he : injective e) (f : ι → α) :
(⨆ j, extend e f ⊥ j) = ⨆ i, f i :=
begin
rw supr_split _ (λ j, ∃ i, e i = j),
simp [extend_apply he, extend_apply', @supr_comm _ β ι] { contextual := tt }
end
/-!
### `supr` and `infi` under `Type`
-/
theorem supr_of_empty' {α ι} [has_Sup α] [is_empty ι] (f : ι → α) :
supr f = Sup (∅ : set α) :=
congr_arg Sup (range_eq_empty f)
theorem supr_of_empty [is_empty ι] (f : ι → α) : supr f = ⊥ :=
(supr_of_empty' f).trans Sup_empty
theorem infi_of_empty' {α ι} [has_Inf α] [is_empty ι] (f : ι → α) :
infi f = Inf (∅ : set α) :=
congr_arg Inf (range_eq_empty f)
theorem infi_of_empty [is_empty ι] (f : ι → α) : infi f = ⊤ :=
@supr_of_empty (order_dual α) _ _ _ f
lemma supr_bool_eq {f : bool → α} : (⨆b:bool, f b) = f tt ⊔ f ff :=
by rw [supr, bool.range_eq, Sup_pair, sup_comm]
lemma infi_bool_eq {f : bool → α} : (⨅b:bool, f b) = f tt ⊓ f ff :=
@supr_bool_eq (order_dual α) _ _
lemma sup_eq_supr (x y : α) : x ⊔ y = ⨆ b : bool, cond b x y :=
by rw [supr_bool_eq, bool.cond_tt, bool.cond_ff]
lemma inf_eq_infi (x y : α) : x ⊓ y = ⨅ b : bool, cond b x y :=
@sup_eq_supr (order_dual α) _ _ _
lemma is_glb_binfi {s : set β} {f : β → α} : is_glb (f '' s) (⨅ x ∈ s, f x) :=
by simpa only [range_comp, subtype.range_coe, infi_subtype'] using @is_glb_infi α s _ (f ∘ coe)
theorem supr_subtype {p : ι → Prop} {f : subtype p → α} : (⨆ x, f x) = (⨆ i (h:p i), f ⟨i, h⟩) :=
@infi_subtype (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
lemma supr_subtype' {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α} :
(⨆ i (h : p i), f i h) = (⨆ x : subtype p, f x x.property) :=
(@supr_subtype _ _ _ p (λ x, f x.val x.property)).symm
lemma supr_subtype'' {ι} (s : set ι) (f : ι → α) :
(⨆ i : s, f i) = ⨆ (t : ι) (H : t ∈ s), f t :=
supr_subtype
lemma is_lub_bsupr {s : set β} {f : β → α} : is_lub (f '' s) (⨆ x ∈ s, f x) :=
by simpa only [range_comp, subtype.range_coe, supr_subtype'] using @is_lub_supr α s _ (f ∘ coe)
theorem infi_sigma {p : β → Type*} {f : sigma p → α} : (⨅ x, f x) = (⨅ i (h:p i), f ⟨i, h⟩) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff $ λ c, by simp only [le_infi_iff, sigma.forall]
theorem supr_sigma {p : β → Type*} {f : sigma p → α} : (⨆ x, f x) = (⨆ i (h:p i), f ⟨i, h⟩) :=
@infi_sigma (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
theorem infi_prod {γ : Type*} {f : β × γ → α} : (⨅ x, f x) = (⨅ i j, f (i, j)) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff $ λ c, by simp only [le_infi_iff, prod.forall]
theorem supr_prod {γ : Type*} {f : β × γ → α} : (⨆ x, f x) = (⨆ i j, f (i, j)) :=
@infi_prod (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
theorem infi_sum {γ : Type*} {f : β ⊕ γ → α} :
(⨅ x, f x) = (⨅ i, f (sum.inl i)) ⊓ (⨅ j, f (sum.inr j)) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff $ λ c, by simp only [le_inf_iff, le_infi_iff, sum.forall]
theorem supr_sum {γ : Type*} {f : β ⊕ γ → α} :
(⨆ x, f x) = (⨆ i, f (sum.inl i)) ⊔ (⨆ j, f (sum.inr j)) :=
@infi_sum (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
theorem supr_option (f : option β → α) :
(⨆ o, f o) = f none ⊔ ⨆ b, f (option.some b) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ c, by simp only [supr_le_iff, sup_le_iff, option.forall]
theorem infi_option (f : option β → α) :
(⨅ o, f o) = f none ⊓ ⨅ b, f (option.some b) :=
@supr_option (order_dual α) _ _ _
/-- A version of `supr_option` useful for rewriting right-to-left. -/
lemma supr_option_elim (a : α) (f : β → α) : (⨆ o : option β, o.elim a f) = a ⊔ ⨆ b, f b :=
by simp [supr_option]
/-- A version of `infi_option` useful for rewriting right-to-left. -/
lemma infi_option_elim (a : α) (f : β → α) : (⨅ o : option β, o.elim a f) = a ⊓ ⨅ b, f b :=
@supr_option_elim (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
/-- When taking the supremum of `f : ι → α`, the elements of `ι` on which `f` gives `⊥` can be
dropped, without changing the result. -/
lemma supr_ne_bot_subtype (f : ι → α) : (⨆ i : {i // f i ≠ ⊥}, f i) = ⨆ i, f i :=
begin
by_cases htriv : ∀ i, f i = ⊥,
{ simp only [htriv, supr_bot] },
refine le_antisymm (supr_comp_le f _) (supr_le_supr2 _),
intros i,
by_cases hi : f i = ⊥,
{ rw hi,
obtain ⟨i₀, hi₀⟩ := not_forall.mp htriv,
exact ⟨⟨i₀, hi₀⟩, bot_le⟩ },
{ exact ⟨⟨i, hi⟩, rfl.le⟩ },
end
/-- When taking the infimum of `f : ι → α`, the elements of `ι` on which `f` gives `⊤` can be
dropped, without changing the result. -/
lemma infi_ne_top_subtype (f : ι → α) : (⨅ i : {i // f i ≠ ⊤}, f i) = ⨅ i, f i :=
@supr_ne_bot_subtype (order_dual α) ι _ f
/-!
### `supr` and `infi` under `ℕ`
-/
lemma supr_ge_eq_supr_nat_add {u : ℕ → α} (n : ℕ) : (⨆ i ≥ n, u i) = ⨆ i, u (i + n) :=
begin
apply le_antisymm;
simp only [supr_le_iff],
{ exact λ i hi, le_Sup ⟨i - n, by { dsimp only, rw tsub_add_cancel_of_le hi }⟩ },
{ exact λ i, le_Sup ⟨i + n, supr_pos (nat.le_add_left _ _)⟩ }
end
lemma infi_ge_eq_infi_nat_add {u : ℕ → α} (n : ℕ) : (⨅ i ≥ n, u i) = ⨅ i, u (i + n) :=
@supr_ge_eq_supr_nat_add (order_dual α) _ _ _
lemma monotone.supr_nat_add {f : ℕ → α} (hf : monotone f) (k : ℕ) :
(⨆ n, f (n + k)) = ⨆ n, f n :=
le_antisymm (supr_le (λ i, le_rfl.trans (le_supr _ (i + k))))
(supr_le_supr (λ i, hf (nat.le_add_right i k)))
@[simp] lemma supr_infi_ge_nat_add (f : ℕ → α) (k : ℕ) :
(⨆ n, ⨅ i ≥ n, f (i + k)) = ⨆ n, ⨅ i ≥ n, f i :=
begin
have hf : monotone (λ n, ⨅ i ≥ n, f i),
from λ n m hnm, le_infi (λ i, (infi_le _ i).trans (le_infi (λ h, infi_le _ (hnm.trans h)))),
rw ←monotone.supr_nat_add hf k,
{ simp_rw [infi_ge_eq_infi_nat_add, ←nat.add_assoc], },
end
lemma sup_supr_nat_succ (u : ℕ → α) : u 0 ⊔ (⨆ i, u (i + 1)) = ⨆ i, u i :=
begin
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff (λ c, _),
simp only [sup_le_iff, supr_le_iff],
refine ⟨λ h, _, λ h, ⟨h _, λ i, h _⟩⟩,
rintro (_|i),
exacts [h.1, h.2 i]
end
lemma inf_infi_nat_succ (u : ℕ → α) : u 0 ⊓ (⨅ i, u (i + 1)) = ⨅ i, u i :=
@sup_supr_nat_succ (order_dual α) _ u
end
section complete_linear_order
variables [complete_linear_order α]
lemma supr_eq_top (f : ι → α) : supr f = ⊤ ↔ (∀b<⊤, ∃i, b < f i) :=
by simp only [← Sup_range, Sup_eq_top, set.exists_range_iff]
lemma infi_eq_bot (f : ι → α) : infi f = ⊥ ↔ (∀b>⊥, ∃i, f i < b) :=
by simp only [← Inf_range, Inf_eq_bot, set.exists_range_iff]
end complete_linear_order
/-!
### Instances
-/
instance Prop.complete_lattice : complete_lattice Prop :=
{ Sup := λs, ∃a∈s, a,
le_Sup := assume s a h p, ⟨a, h, p⟩,
Sup_le := assume s a h ⟨b, h', p⟩, h b h' p,
Inf := λs, ∀a:Prop, a∈s → a,
Inf_le := assume s a h p, p a h,
le_Inf := assume s a h p b hb, h b hb p,
.. Prop.bounded_order,
.. Prop.distrib_lattice }
@[simp] lemma Inf_Prop_eq {s : set Prop} : Inf s = (∀p ∈ s, p) := rfl
@[simp] lemma Sup_Prop_eq {s : set Prop} : Sup s = (∃p ∈ s, p) := rfl
@[simp] lemma infi_Prop_eq {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} : (⨅i, p i) = (∀i, p i) :=
le_antisymm (assume h i, h _ ⟨i, rfl⟩ ) (assume h p ⟨i, eq⟩, eq ▸ h i)
@[simp] lemma supr_Prop_eq {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} : (⨆i, p i) = (∃i, p i) :=
le_antisymm (λ ⟨q, ⟨i, (eq : p i = q)⟩, hq⟩, ⟨i, eq.symm ▸ hq⟩) (λ ⟨i, hi⟩, ⟨p i, ⟨i, rfl⟩, hi⟩)
instance pi.has_Sup {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} [Π i, has_Sup (β i)] : has_Sup (Π i, β i) :=
⟨λ s i, ⨆ f : s, (f : Π i, β i) i⟩
instance pi.has_Inf {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} [Π i, has_Inf (β i)] : has_Inf (Π i, β i) :=
⟨λ s i, ⨅ f : s, (f : Π i, β i) i⟩
instance pi.complete_lattice {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} [∀ i, complete_lattice (β i)] :
complete_lattice (Π i, β i) :=
{ Sup := Sup,
Inf := Inf,
le_Sup := λ s f hf i, le_supr (λ f : s, (f : Π i, β i) i) ⟨f, hf⟩,
Inf_le := λ s f hf i, infi_le (λ f : s, (f : Π i, β i) i) ⟨f, hf⟩,
Sup_le := λ s f hf i, supr_le $ λ g, hf g g.2 i,
le_Inf := λ s f hf i, le_infi $ λ g, hf g g.2 i,
.. pi.bounded_order,
.. pi.lattice }
lemma Inf_apply {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} [Π i, has_Inf (β i)]
{s : set (Πa, β a)} {a : α} :
(Inf s) a = (⨅ f : s, (f : Πa, β a) a) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma infi_apply {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} {ι : Sort*} [Π i, has_Inf (β i)]
{f : ι → Πa, β a} {a : α} :
(⨅i, f i) a = (⨅i, f i a) :=
by rw [infi, Inf_apply, infi, infi, ← image_eq_range (λ f : Π i, β i, f a) (range f), ← range_comp]
lemma Sup_apply {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} [Π i, has_Sup (β i)] {s : set (Πa, β a)} {a : α} :
(Sup s) a = (⨆f:s, (f : Πa, β a) a) :=
rfl
lemma unary_relation_Sup_iff {α : Type*} (s : set (α → Prop)) {a : α} :
Sup s a ↔ ∃ (r : α → Prop), r ∈ s ∧ r a :=
by { change (∃ _, _) ↔ _, simp [-eq_iff_iff] }
lemma binary_relation_Sup_iff {α β : Type*} (s : set (α → β → Prop)) {a : α} {b : β} :
Sup s a b ↔ ∃ (r : α → β → Prop), r ∈ s ∧ r a b :=
by { change (∃ _, _) ↔ _, simp [-eq_iff_iff] }
@[simp] lemma supr_apply {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} {ι : Sort*} [Π i, has_Sup (β i)]
{f : ι → Πa, β a} {a : α} :
(⨆i, f i) a = (⨆i, f i a) :=
@infi_apply α (λ i, order_dual (β i)) _ _ f a
section complete_lattice
variables [preorder α] [complete_lattice β]
theorem monotone_Sup_of_monotone {s : set (α → β)} (m_s : ∀f∈s, monotone f) : monotone (Sup s) :=
assume x y h, supr_le $ λ f, le_supr_of_le f $ m_s f f.2 h
theorem monotone_Inf_of_monotone {s : set (α → β)} (m_s : ∀f∈s, monotone f) : monotone (Inf s) :=
assume x y h, le_infi $ λ f, infi_le_of_le f $ m_s f f.2 h
end complete_lattice
namespace prod
variables (α β)
instance [has_Inf α] [has_Inf β] : has_Inf (α × β) :=
⟨λs, (Inf (prod.fst '' s), Inf (prod.snd '' s))⟩
instance [has_Sup α] [has_Sup β] : has_Sup (α × β) :=
⟨λs, (Sup (prod.fst '' s), Sup (prod.snd '' s))⟩
instance [complete_lattice α] [complete_lattice β] : complete_lattice (α × β) :=
{ le_Sup := assume s p hab, ⟨le_Sup $ mem_image_of_mem _ hab, le_Sup $ mem_image_of_mem _ hab⟩,
Sup_le := assume s p h,
⟨ Sup_le $ ball_image_of_ball $ assume p hp, (h p hp).1,
Sup_le $ ball_image_of_ball $ assume p hp, (h p hp).2⟩,
Inf_le := assume s p hab, ⟨Inf_le $ mem_image_of_mem _ hab, Inf_le $ mem_image_of_mem _ hab⟩,
le_Inf := assume s p h,
⟨ le_Inf $ ball_image_of_ball $ assume p hp, (h p hp).1,
le_Inf $ ball_image_of_ball $ assume p hp, (h p hp).2⟩,
.. prod.lattice α β,
.. prod.bounded_order α β,
.. prod.has_Sup α β,
.. prod.has_Inf α β }
end prod
section complete_lattice
variables [complete_lattice α] {a : α} {s : set α}
/-- This is a weaker version of `sup_Inf_eq` -/
lemma sup_Inf_le_infi_sup :
a ⊔ Inf s ≤ (⨅ b ∈ s, a ⊔ b) :=
le_infi $ assume i, le_infi $ assume h, sup_le_sup_left (Inf_le h) _
/-- This is a weaker version of `Inf_sup_eq` -/
lemma Inf_sup_le_infi_sup :
Inf s ⊔ a ≤ (⨅ b ∈ s, b ⊔ a) :=
le_infi $ assume i, le_infi $ assume h, sup_le_sup_right (Inf_le h) _
/-- This is a weaker version of `inf_Sup_eq` -/
lemma supr_inf_le_inf_Sup :
(⨆ b ∈ s, a ⊓ b) ≤ a ⊓ Sup s :=
supr_le $ assume i, supr_le $ assume h, inf_le_inf_left _ (le_Sup h)
/-- This is a weaker version of `Sup_inf_eq` -/
lemma supr_inf_le_Sup_inf :
(⨆ b ∈ s, b ⊓ a) ≤ Sup s ⊓ a :=
supr_le $ assume i, supr_le $ assume h, inf_le_inf_right _ (le_Sup h)
lemma disjoint_Sup_left {a : set α} {b : α} (d : disjoint (Sup a) b) {i} (hi : i ∈ a) :
disjoint i b :=
(supr_le_iff.mp (supr_le_iff.mp (supr_inf_le_Sup_inf.trans (d : _)) i : _) hi : _)
lemma disjoint_Sup_right {a : set α} {b : α} (d : disjoint b (Sup a)) {i} (hi : i ∈ a) :
disjoint b i :=
(supr_le_iff.mp (supr_le_iff.mp (supr_inf_le_inf_Sup.trans (d : _)) i : _) hi : _)
end complete_lattice
namespace complete_lattice
variables [complete_lattice α]
/-- An independent set of elements in a complete lattice is one in which every element is disjoint
from the `Sup` of the rest. -/
def set_independent (s : set α) : Prop := ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → disjoint a (Sup (s \ {a}))
variables {s : set α} (hs : set_independent s)
@[simp]
lemma set_independent_empty : set_independent (∅ : set α) :=
λ x hx, (set.not_mem_empty x hx).elim
theorem set_independent.mono {t : set α} (hst : t ⊆ s) :
set_independent t :=
λ a ha, (hs (hst ha)).mono_right (Sup_le_Sup (diff_subset_diff_left hst))
/-- If the elements of a set are independent, then any pair within that set is disjoint. -/
lemma set_independent.disjoint {x y : α} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) (h : x ≠ y) : disjoint x y :=
disjoint_Sup_right (hs hx) ((mem_diff y).mpr ⟨hy, by simp [h.symm]⟩)
include hs
/-- If the elements of a set are independent, then any element is disjoint from the `Sup` of some
subset of the rest. -/
lemma set_independent.disjoint_Sup {x : α} {y : set α} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ⊆ s) (hxy : x ∉ y) :
disjoint x (Sup y) :=
begin
have := (hs.mono $ insert_subset.mpr ⟨hx, hy⟩) (mem_insert x _),
rw [insert_diff_of_mem _ (mem_singleton _), diff_singleton_eq_self hxy] at this,
exact this,
end
omit hs
/-- An independent indexed family of elements in a complete lattice is one in which every element
is disjoint from the `supr` of the rest.
Example: an indexed family of non-zero elements in a
vector space is linearly independent iff the indexed family of subspaces they generate is
independent in this sense.
Example: an indexed family of submodules of a module is independent in this sense if
and only the natural map from the direct sum of the submodules to the module is injective. -/
def independent {ι : Sort*} {α : Type*} [complete_lattice α] (t : ι → α) : Prop :=
∀ i : ι, disjoint (t i) (⨆ (j ≠ i), t j)
lemma set_independent_iff {α : Type*} [complete_lattice α] (s : set α) :
set_independent s ↔ independent (coe : s → α) :=
begin
simp_rw [independent, set_independent, set_coe.forall, Sup_eq_supr],
refine forall₂_congr (λ a ha, _),
congr' 2,
convert supr_subtype.symm,
simp [supr_and],
end
variables {t : ι → α} (ht : independent t)
theorem independent_def : independent t ↔ ∀ i : ι, disjoint (t i) (⨆ (j ≠ i), t j) :=
iff.rfl
theorem independent_def' {ι : Type*} {t : ι → α} :
independent t ↔ ∀ i, disjoint (t i) (Sup (t '' {j | j ≠ i})) :=
by {simp_rw Sup_image, refl}
theorem independent_def'' {ι : Type*} {t : ι → α} :
independent t ↔ ∀ i, disjoint (t i) (Sup {a | ∃ j ≠ i, t j = a}) :=
by {rw independent_def', tidy}
@[simp]
lemma independent_empty (t : empty → α) : independent t.
@[simp]
lemma independent_pempty (t : pempty → α) : independent t.
/-- If the elements of a set are independent, then any pair within that set is disjoint. -/
lemma independent.disjoint {x y : ι} (h : x ≠ y) : disjoint (t x) (t y) :=
disjoint_Sup_right (ht x) ⟨y, by simp [h.symm]⟩
lemma independent.mono {ι : Type*} {α : Type*} [complete_lattice α]
{s t : ι → α} (hs : independent s) (hst : t ≤ s) :
independent t :=
λ i, (hs i).mono (hst i) (supr_le_supr $ λ j, supr_le_supr $ λ _, hst j)
/-- Composing an independent indexed family with an injective function on the index results in
another indepedendent indexed family. -/
lemma independent.comp {ι ι' : Sort*} {α : Type*} [complete_lattice α]
{s : ι → α} (hs : independent s) (f : ι' → ι) (hf : function.injective f) :
independent (s ∘ f) :=
λ i, (hs (f i)).mono_right begin
refine (supr_le_supr $ λ i, _).trans (supr_comp_le _ f),
exact supr_le_supr_const hf.ne,
end
/-- Composing an indepedent indexed family with an order isomorphism on the elements results in
another indepedendent indexed family. -/
lemma independent.map_order_iso {ι : Sort*} {α β : Type*}
[complete_lattice α] [complete_lattice β] (f : α ≃o β) {a : ι → α} (ha : independent a) :
independent (f ∘ a) :=
λ i, ((ha i).map_order_iso f).mono_right (f.monotone.le_map_supr2 _)
@[simp] lemma independent_map_order_iso_iff {ι : Sort*} {α β : Type*}
[complete_lattice α] [complete_lattice β] (f : α ≃o β) {a : ι → α} :
independent (f ∘ a) ↔ independent a :=
⟨ λ h, have hf : f.symm ∘ f ∘ a = a := congr_arg (∘ a) f.left_inv.comp_eq_id,
hf ▸ h.map_order_iso f.symm,
λ h, h.map_order_iso f⟩
/-- If the elements of a set are independent, then any element is disjoint from the `supr` of some
subset of the rest. -/
lemma independent.disjoint_bsupr {ι : Type*} {α : Type*} [complete_lattice α]
{t : ι → α} (ht : independent t) {x : ι} {y : set ι} (hx : x ∉ y) :
disjoint (t x) (⨆ i ∈ y, t i) :=
disjoint.mono_right (bsupr_le_bsupr' $ λ i hi, (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hi hx : _)) (ht x)
end complete_lattice
|
0a5610f00f6545c9d0ee72a471ef789f4c9642b5 | 55c7fc2bf55d496ace18cd6f3376e12bb14c8cc5 | /src/analysis/normed_space/indicator_function.lean | eda49b24d8215566391e7b982a5791a7d65910a1 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dupuisf/mathlib | 62de4ec6544bf3b79086afd27b6529acfaf2c1bb | 8582b06b0a5d06c33ee07d0bdf7c646cae22cf36 | refs/heads/master | 1,669,494,854,016 | 1,595,692,409,000 | 1,595,692,409,000 | 272,046,630 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,592,066,143,000 | 1,592,066,142,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,166 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import data.indicator_function
import analysis.normed_space.basic
/-!
# Indicator function and norm
This file contains a few simple lemmas about `set.indicator` and `norm`.
## Tags
indicator, norm
-/
variables {α E : Type*} [normed_group E] {s t : set α} (f : α → E) (a : α)
open set
lemma norm_indicator_eq_indicator_norm :
∥indicator s f a∥ = indicator s (λa, ∥f a∥) a :=
flip congr_fun a (indicator_comp_of_zero norm_zero).symm
lemma norm_indicator_le_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) (f : α → E) (a : α) :
∥indicator s f a∥ ≤ ∥indicator t f a∥ :=
begin
simp only [norm_indicator_eq_indicator_norm],
exact indicator_le_indicator_of_subset ‹_› (λ _, norm_nonneg _) _
end
lemma indicator_norm_le_norm_self : indicator s (λa, ∥f a∥) a ≤ ∥f a∥ :=
indicator_le_self' (λ _ _, norm_nonneg _) a
lemma norm_indicator_le_norm_self : ∥indicator s f a∥ ≤ ∥f a∥ :=
by { rw norm_indicator_eq_indicator_norm, apply indicator_norm_le_norm_self }
|
5fb1b5a05a7d3b7d2653c560223661431a4f15e7 | fe84e287c662151bb313504482b218a503b972f3 | /src/commutative_algebra/localization.lean | c9caba1e30f9835f93922fcaf8ff729c470740d0 | [] | no_license | NeilStrickland/lean_lib | 91e163f514b829c42fe75636407138b5c75cba83 | 6a9563de93748ace509d9db4302db6cd77d8f92c | refs/heads/master | 1,653,408,198,261 | 1,652,996,419,000 | 1,652,996,419,000 | 181,006,067 | 4 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 15,079 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Neil Strickland. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Neil Strickland
This is about localization of commutative rings and semirings.
The most common approach is to start with a commutative ring
`A` and a subset `S` that contains `1` and is closed under
multiplication. We then define a set `A[S⁻¹]` of equivalence
classes of fractions `a/s` (with `a ∈ A` and `s ∈ S`), and
introduce a ring structure on `A[S⁻¹]`, and prove various
things about it. In particular, we prove a universal property.
In this file, we deviate in various ways from the above approach.
Firstly, we work with semirings rather than rings. This wider
generality has some applications in stable homotopy theory, for
example: given a finite group `G` it is useful to be able to
work with the Burnside semiring of isomorphism classes of finite
`G`-sets, or the representation semiring of isomorphism classes
of finite-dimensional representation, rather than immediately
passing to the group completion.
Secondly, it is technically convenient to take `S` to be a
commutative monoid equipped with a homomorphism `i` from
`S` to the multiplicative monoid of `A`, without insisting
that `i` is just the inclusion of a submonoid, or even that
`i` is injective. For example, when forming `A[a⁻¹]` for a
single element `a`, we take `S = ℕ` and `i n = aⁿ`. This
does not cause any real issues. Triples `(A,S,i)` of this
type play a central role in the theory of log geometry, so
we have chosen to call them "prelog semirings". We have
bundled the ingredients together as a structure; it is not
clear whether this is the best approach.
Next, to stay as long as possible in the constructive/
effectively computable world, it is useful to introduce as
much structure as possible on the set `A × S` of unreduced
fractions, before passing to equivalence classes. All semiring
operations can be defined in this context, and most axioms are
satisfied, and the remaining axioms fail in a well-controlled
way.
One thing that is currently missing is as follows. Suppose
we have `S` and `i` as before, and a semiring homomorphism
`f : A → B`. Suppose that the homomorphism `f ∘ i` lands in
invertible elements of `B`, or more constructively, that
we have a given homomorphism `j : S → units B` lifting
`f ∘ i`. (There are some wrinkles here about the fact that
unique existence statements do not give computable witnesses,
which is why we need to qualify the above statement.) We
then get an induced map `A[S⁻¹] → B`. We would like to have
a simple criterion for when this map is an isomorphism, or
equivalently when `B` also has the universal property that
characterises `A[S⁻¹]`. It is not yet clear what is the best
way to formulate this. Ideally, the resulting maps out of
`B` should be effectively computable in some natural cases.
-/
import algebra.ring group_theory.submonoid ring_theory.ideal.basic linear_algebra.basic
import tactic.ring tactic.abel
namespace localization_alt
universes u v w x
structure prelog_semiring :=
(A : Type u)
(S : Type v)
(A_comm_semiring : comm_semiring A)
(S_comm_monoid : comm_monoid S)
(i : S →* A)
namespace prelog_semiring
open prelog_semiring
instance to_comm_semiring (P : prelog_semiring) : comm_semiring P.A :=
P.A_comm_semiring
instance to_comm_monoid_S (P : prelog_semiring) : comm_monoid P.S :=
P.S_comm_monoid
instance to_comm_monoid_A (P : prelog_semiring) : comm_monoid P.A :=
@comm_semiring.to_comm_monoid P.A P.A_comm_semiring
instance to_monoid_S (P : prelog_semiring) : monoid P.S :=
@comm_monoid.to_monoid P.S (@prelog_semiring.to_comm_monoid_S P)
instance to_monoid_A (P : prelog_semiring) : monoid P.A :=
@comm_monoid.to_monoid P.A (@prelog_semiring.to_comm_monoid_A P)
structure preloc (P : prelog_semiring) :=
(numer : P.A) (denom : P.S)
namespace preloc
open preloc
variable {P : prelog_semiring}
notation a `/₀` s := preloc.mk a s
@[ext]
lemma ext : ∀ (a₁ a₂ : P.A) (s₁ s₂ : P.S), a₁ = a₂ → s₁ = s₂ →
(a₁ /₀ s₁) = (a₂ /₀ s₂) :=
by { intros; congr; assumption }
lemma ext' : ∀ {x₁ x₂ : preloc P},
x₁ = x₂ ↔ (x₁.numer = x₂.numer) ∧ (x₁.denom = x₂.denom)
| ⟨_,_⟩ ⟨_,_⟩ := by { simp }
instance : comm_monoid (preloc P) := begin
let one : (preloc P) := (1 /₀ 1),
let mul : (preloc P) → (preloc P) → (preloc P) :=
λ x y, ((x.numer * y.numer) /₀ (x.denom * y.denom)),
let one_mul : ∀ (x : preloc P), mul one x = x :=
begin
intro x,cases x with a s,
exact congr (congr_arg preloc.mk (one_mul a)) (one_mul s),
end,
let mul_one : ∀ (x : preloc P), mul x one = x :=
begin
intro x,cases x with a s,
exact congr (congr_arg preloc.mk (mul_one a)) (mul_one s),
end,
let mul_comm : ∀ x y, mul x y = mul y x :=
begin
intros x y,cases x with a s,cases y with b t,
exact @congr P.S (preloc P) _ _ _ _
(congr_arg (@preloc.mk P) (mul_comm a b)) (mul_comm s t),
end,
let mul_assoc : ∀ x y z, mul (mul x y) z = mul x (mul y z) :=
begin
intros x y z,cases x with a s, cases y with b t, cases z with c u,
exact @congr P.S (preloc P) _ _ _ _
(congr_arg (@preloc.mk P) (mul_assoc a b c)) (mul_assoc s t u),
end,
exact {
one := one, mul := mul,
mul_one := mul_one, one_mul := one_mul,
mul_comm := mul_comm, mul_assoc := mul_assoc
}
end
instance : add_comm_monoid (preloc P) := begin
let zero : (preloc P) := (0 /₀ 1),
let add : (preloc P) → (preloc P) → (preloc P) :=
λ x y, ((x.numer * (P.i y.denom) + (P.i x.denom) * y.numer) /₀
(x.denom * y.denom)),
let zero_add : ∀ (x : preloc P), add zero x = x :=
begin
intro x,cases x with a s,
let h0 := (congr_fun (congr_arg P.A_comm_semiring.mul P.i.map_one) a),
let h1 := congr (congr_arg P.A_comm_semiring.add (zero_mul (P.i s))) h0,
let h2 := h1.trans ((zero_add (1 * a)).trans (one_mul a)),
exact congr (congr_arg preloc.mk h2) (one_mul s),
end,
let add_zero : ∀ (x : preloc P), add x zero = x :=
begin
intro x,cases x with a s,
dsimp[zero,add],
let h0 := (congr_arg ((*) a) P.i.map_one).trans (mul_one a),
let h1 := (congr (congr_arg (+) h0) (mul_zero (P.i s))).trans (add_zero a),
exact congr (congr_arg preloc.mk h1) (mul_one s),
end,
let add_comm : ∀ x y, add x y = add y x :=
begin
intros x y,cases x with a s,cases y with b t,
dsimp[add],
rw[mul_comm s t,mul_comm a (P.i t),mul_comm (P.i s) b,add_comm],
end,
let add_assoc : ∀ x y z, add (add x y) z = add x (add y z) :=
begin
intros x y z,cases x with a s, cases y with b t, cases z with c u,
dsimp[add],
rw[P.i.map_mul,P.i.map_mul,add_mul,mul_add],
rw[add_assoc,mul_assoc s t u,mul_assoc a (P.i t) (P.i u),
mul_assoc (P.i s) b (P.i u),mul_assoc (P.i s) (P.i t) c],
end,
exact {
zero := zero, add := add,
add_zero := add_zero, zero_add := zero_add,
add_comm := add_comm, add_assoc := add_assoc
},
end
lemma numer_def (a : P.A) (s : P.S) : (a /₀ s).numer = a := rfl
lemma denom_def (a : P.A) (s : P.S) : (a /₀ s).denom = s := rfl
lemma numer_zero : @preloc.numer P 0 = 0 := rfl
lemma denom_zero : @preloc.denom P 0 = 1 := rfl
lemma numer_one : @preloc.numer P 1 = 1 := rfl
lemma denom_one : @preloc.denom P 1 = 1 := rfl
lemma one_def : (1 : preloc P) = (1 /₀ 1) := rfl
lemma mul_def (x y : preloc P) :
x * y = ((x.numer * y.numer) /₀ (x.denom * y.denom)) := rfl
lemma mul_def' (a b : P.A) (s t : P.S) :
(a /₀ s) * (b /₀ t) = ((a * b) /₀ (s * t)) := rfl
lemma zero_def : (0 : preloc P) = (0 /₀ 1) := rfl
lemma add_def (x y : preloc P) :
x + y = (((x.numer * (P.i y.denom) + (P.i x.denom) * y.numer):P.A) /₀
(x.denom * y.denom)) := rfl
lemma add_def' (a b : P.A) (s t : P.S) :
(a /₀ s) + (b /₀ t) = (((a * (P.i t) + (P.i s) * b)) /₀ (s * t)) := rfl
def η₀ (a : P.A) : preloc P := a /₀ 1
lemma numer_eta (a : P.A) : (η₀ a).numer = a := rfl
lemma denom_eta (a : P.A) : (η₀ a).denom = 1 := rfl
lemma eta_map_zero : @η₀ P 0 = 0 := rfl
lemma eta_map_one : @η₀ P 1 = 1 := rfl
lemma eta_map_mul (a b : P.A) : η₀ (a * b) = (η₀ a) * (η₀ b) :=
begin
ext,
rw[numer_eta,numer_eta],
rw[denom_eta,denom_eta,mul_one]
end
lemma eta_map_add (a b : P.A) : η₀ (a + b) = (η₀ a) + (η₀ b) :=
begin
ext,
rw[numer_eta,numer_eta,denom_eta,denom_eta,
P.i.map_one,mul_one,one_mul],
rw[denom_eta,denom_eta,mul_one],
end
structure R (x x' : preloc P) :=
(s : P.S)
(e : P.i (s * x'.denom) * x.numer = P.i (s * x.denom) * x'.numer)
def R_refl (x : preloc P) : R x x :=
{s := 1, e := rfl}
def R_symm {x x' : preloc P} (m : R x x') : R x' x :=
{s := m.s, e := m.e.symm}
def R_trans {x x' x'' : preloc P} (m : R x x') (n : R x' x'') : R x x'' :=
begin
rcases x with ⟨a,u⟩, rcases x' with ⟨a',u'⟩, rcases x'' with ⟨a'',u''⟩,
let ss := m.s * n.s * u',
let ee := calc
P.i (ss * u'') * a = P.i (n.s * u'') * (P.i (m.s * u') * a)
: by {repeat {rw[P.i.map_mul]}, ring,}
... = P.i (n.s * u'') * (P.i (m.s * u) * a') : by rw[m.e]
... = P.i (m.s * u) * (P.i (n.s * u'') * a') : by ring
... = P.i (m.s * u) * (P.i (n.s * u') * a'') : by rw[n.e]
... = P.i (ss * u) * a''
: by {repeat {rw[P.i.map_mul]}, ring,},
exact { s := ss, e := ee }
end
def R_zero : (R 0 0) := R_refl (0 : preloc P)
def R_one : (R 1 1) := R_refl (1 : preloc P)
def R_add {x y x' y' : preloc P} (m : R x x') (n : R y y') :
R (x + y) (x' + y') :=
begin
rcases x with ⟨a,u⟩, rcases x' with ⟨a',u'⟩,
rcases y with ⟨b,v⟩, rcases y' with ⟨b',v'⟩,
let ss := m.s * n.s,
let ee := calc
(P.i (ss * (u' * v'))) * (a * (P.i v) + (P.i u) * b)
= P.i (n.s * v * v') * (P.i (m.s * u') * a) +
P.i (m.s * u * u') * (P.i (n.s * v') * b)
: by {repeat {rw[P.i.map_mul]}, ring,}
... = P.i (n.s * v * v') * (P.i (m.s * u) * a') +
P.i (m.s * u * u') * (P.i (n.s * v) * b')
: by rw[m.e,n.e]
... = (P.i (ss * (u * v))) * (a' * (P.i v') + (P.i u') * b')
: by {repeat {rw[P.i.map_mul]}, ring,},
exact { s := ss, e := ee },
end
def R_mul {x y x' y' : preloc P} (m : R x x') (n : R y y') :
R (x * y) (x' * y') :=
begin
rcases x with ⟨a,u⟩, rcases x' with ⟨a',u'⟩,
rcases y with ⟨b,v⟩, rcases y' with ⟨b',v'⟩,
let ss := m.s * n.s,
let ee := calc
(P.i (ss * (u' * v'))) * (a * b)
= (P.i (m.s * u') * a) * (P.i (n.s * v') * b)
: by {repeat {rw[P.i.map_mul]}, ring,}
... = (P.i (m.s * u) * a') * (P.i (n.s * v) * b')
: by rw[m.e,n.e]
... = (P.i (ss * (u * v))) * (a' * b')
: by {repeat {rw[P.i.map_mul]}, ring,},
exact { s := ss, e := ee },
end
def R_zero_mul : ∀ (x : preloc P), R (0 * x) 0
| ⟨a,u⟩ := {s := 1,e := begin
show (P.i (1 * 1)) * (0 * a) = (P.i (1 * (1 * u))) * 0,
rw[_root_.zero_mul,_root_.mul_zero,_root_.mul_zero],
end}
def R_mul_zero : ∀ (x : preloc P), R (x * 0) 0
| ⟨a,u⟩ := {s := 1,e := begin
show (P.i (1 * 1)) * (a * 0) = (P.i (1 * (u * 1))) * 0,
repeat {rw[_root_.mul_zero]},
end}
def R_mul_add (x y z : preloc P) : R (x * (y + z)) (x * y + x * z) :=
begin
rcases x with ⟨a,u⟩, rcases y with ⟨b,v⟩, rcases z with ⟨c,w⟩,
have e : (P.i (1 * ((u * v) * (u * w)))) *
(a * (b * (P.i w) + (P.i v) * c)) =
(P.i (1 * (u * (v *w)))) *
((a * b) * P.i (u * w) + P.i (u * v) * (a * c)) :=
by {repeat {rw[P.i.map_mul]}, ring,},
exact {s := 1, e := e},
end
def R_add_mul (x y z : preloc P) : R ((x + y) * z) (x * z + y * z) :=
begin
rcases x with ⟨a,u⟩, rcases y with ⟨b,v⟩, rcases z with ⟨c,w⟩,
have e : (P.i (1 * ((u * w) * (v * w)))) *
((a * (P.i v) + (P.i u) * b) * c) =
(P.i (1 * (u * v *w))) *
((a * c) * P.i (v * w) + P.i (u * w) * (b * c)) :=
by {repeat {rw[P.i.map_mul]}, ring,},
exact {s := 1, e := e},
end
variable (P)
instance loc_equiv : setoid (preloc P) := {
r := λ x x', nonempty (R x x'),
iseqv := ⟨λ x,⟨R_refl x⟩,
λ x x',by {rintro ⟨m⟩,exact ⟨R_symm m⟩},
λ x x' x'',by {rintros ⟨m⟩ ⟨n⟩, exact ⟨R_trans m n⟩}⟩
}
lemma r_add {x y x' y' : preloc P} : ∀ (m : x ≈ x') (n : y ≈ y'),
(x + y) ≈ (x' + y')
| ⟨m⟩ ⟨n⟩ := ⟨R_add m n⟩
lemma r_mul {x y x' y' : preloc P} : ∀ (m : x ≈ x') (n : y ≈ y'),
(x * y) ≈ (x' * y')
| ⟨m⟩ ⟨n⟩ := ⟨R_mul m n⟩
end preloc
def loc (P : prelog_semiring) := quotient (preloc.loc_equiv P)
namespace loc
variable {P : prelog_semiring}
def mk0 : (preloc P) → (loc P) := quotient.mk
def mk (a : P.A) (s : P.S) : loc P := mk0 (a /₀ s)
notation a `/₁` s := loc.mk a s
instance : comm_semiring (loc P) := {
zero := mk0 0,
one := mk0 1,
add := quotient.lift₂
(λ x y, mk0 (x + y))
(λ x y x' y' m n, quotient.sound (@preloc.r_add P x y x' y' m n)),
mul := quotient.lift₂
(λ x y, mk0 (x * y))
(λ x y x' y' m n, quotient.sound (@preloc.r_mul P x y x' y' m n)),
zero_add := λ x,by {rcases x,exact congr_arg mk0 (zero_add x),},
add_zero := λ x,by {rcases x,exact congr_arg mk0 (add_zero x),},
one_mul := λ x,by {rcases x,exact congr_arg mk0 (one_mul x),},
mul_one := λ x,by {rcases x,exact congr_arg mk0 (mul_one x),},
zero_mul := λ x,by {rcases x,exact quotient.sound ⟨preloc.R_zero_mul x⟩,},
mul_zero := λ x,by {rcases x,exact quotient.sound ⟨preloc.R_mul_zero x⟩,},
add_comm := λ x y,by {rcases x, rcases y, exact congr_arg mk0 (add_comm x y)},
mul_comm := λ x y,by {rcases x, rcases y, exact congr_arg mk0 (mul_comm x y)},
add_assoc := λ x y z,by {rcases x,rcases y,rcases z,
exact congr_arg mk0 (add_assoc x y z)},
mul_assoc := λ x y z,by {rcases x,rcases y,rcases z,
exact congr_arg mk0 (mul_assoc x y z)},
left_distrib := λ x y z,by {rcases x,rcases y,rcases z,
exact quotient.sound ⟨@preloc.R_mul_add P x y z⟩,
},
right_distrib := λ x y z,by {rcases x,rcases y,rcases z,
exact quotient.sound ⟨@preloc.R_add_mul P x y z⟩,
},
}
def η {P : prelog_semiring} : P.A →+* (loc P) := {
to_fun := λ a, a /₁ 1,
map_zero' := rfl,
map_one' := rfl,
map_add' := λ a b,congr_arg mk0 (preloc.eta_map_add a b),
map_mul' := λ a b, begin
have := preloc.eta_map_mul a b,
have := congr_arg mk0 this,
exact this
end
}
def ζ (s : P.S) : units (loc P) := begin
let val : loc P := ((P.i s) /₁ 1),
let inv : loc P := (1 /₁ s),
let val_inv : val * inv = 1 := begin
show mk0 (((P.i s) * 1) /₀ (1 * s)) = mk0 (1 /₀ 1),
let h : (((P.i s) * 1) /₀ (1 * s)) ≈ (1 /₀ 1) :=
⟨{ s := 1 , e := by {simp[P.i.map_one],}}⟩ ,
exact quotient.sound h,
end,
let inv_val := (mul_comm inv val).trans val_inv,
exact { val := val, inv := inv, val_inv := val_inv, inv_val := inv_val },
end
end loc
end prelog_semiring
end localization_alt
|
eb985dd6b93def1a305cf171da02fff537dbadb6 | 130c49f47783503e462c16b2eff31933442be6ff | /stage0/src/Lean/Elab/Tactic/Basic.lean | 2b0ff5806cbad24dc25cfbb3dfe2a88461f26cb4 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Hazel-Brown/lean4 | 8aa5860e282435ffc30dcdfccd34006c59d1d39c | 79e6732fc6bbf5af831b76f310f9c488d44e7a16 | refs/heads/master | 1,689,218,208,951 | 1,629,736,869,000 | 1,629,736,896,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,554 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Sebastian Ullrich
-/
import Lean.Util.CollectMVars
import Lean.Parser.Command
import Lean.Meta.PPGoal
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Assumption
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Contradiction
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Intro
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Clear
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Revert
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Subst
import Lean.Elab.Util
import Lean.Elab.Term
import Lean.Elab.Binders
namespace Lean.Elab
open Meta
/- Assign `mvarId := sorry` -/
def admitGoal (mvarId : MVarId) : MetaM Unit :=
withMVarContext mvarId do
let mvarType ← inferType (mkMVar mvarId)
assignExprMVar mvarId (← mkSorry mvarType (synthetic := true))
def goalsToMessageData (goals : List MVarId) : MessageData :=
MessageData.joinSep (goals.map $ MessageData.ofGoal) m!"\n\n"
def Term.reportUnsolvedGoals (goals : List MVarId) : TermElabM Unit :=
withPPInaccessibleNames do
logError <| MessageData.tagged `Tactic.unsolvedGoals <| m!"unsolved goals\n{goalsToMessageData goals}"
goals.forM fun mvarId => admitGoal mvarId
namespace Tactic
structure Context where
main : MVarId
-- declaration name of the executing elaborator, used by `mkTacticInfo` to persist it in the info tree
elaborator : Name
structure State where
goals : List MVarId
deriving Inhabited
structure SavedState where
term : Term.SavedState
tactic : State
abbrev TacticM := ReaderT Context $ StateRefT State TermElabM
abbrev Tactic := Syntax → TacticM Unit
-- Make the compiler generate specialized `pure`/`bind` so we do not have to optimize through the
-- whole monad stack at every use site. May eventually be covered by `deriving`.
instance : Monad TacticM := let i := inferInstanceAs (Monad TacticM); { pure := i.pure, bind := i.bind }
def getGoals : TacticM (List MVarId) :=
return (← get).goals
def setGoals (mvarIds : List MVarId) : TacticM Unit :=
modify fun s => { s with goals := mvarIds }
def pruneSolvedGoals : TacticM Unit := do
let gs ← getGoals
let gs ← gs.filterM fun g => not <$> isExprMVarAssigned g
setGoals gs
def getUnsolvedGoals : TacticM (List MVarId) := do
pruneSolvedGoals
getGoals
@[inline] private def TacticM.runCore (x : TacticM α) (ctx : Context) (s : State) : TermElabM (α × State) :=
x ctx |>.run s
@[inline] private def TacticM.runCore' (x : TacticM α) (ctx : Context) (s : State) : TermElabM α :=
Prod.fst <$> x.runCore ctx s
def run (mvarId : MVarId) (x : TacticM Unit) : TermElabM (List MVarId) :=
withMVarContext mvarId do
let savedSyntheticMVars := (← get).syntheticMVars
modify fun s => { s with syntheticMVars := [] }
let aux : TacticM (List MVarId) :=
/- Important: the following `try` does not backtrack the state.
This is intentional because we don't want to backtrack the error messages when we catch the "abort internal exception"
We must define `run` here because we define `MonadExcept` instance for `TacticM` -/
try
x; getUnsolvedGoals
catch ex =>
if isAbortTacticException ex then
getUnsolvedGoals
else
throw ex
try
aux.runCore' { main := mvarId, elaborator := Name.anonymous } { goals := [mvarId] }
finally
modify fun s => { s with syntheticMVars := savedSyntheticMVars }
protected def saveState : TacticM SavedState :=
return { term := (← Term.saveState), tactic := (← get) }
def SavedState.restore (b : SavedState) : TacticM Unit := do
b.term.restore
set b.tactic
protected def getCurrMacroScope : TacticM MacroScope := do pure (← readThe Term.Context).currMacroScope
protected def getMainModule : TacticM Name := do pure (← getEnv).mainModule
unsafe def mkTacticAttribute : IO (KeyedDeclsAttribute Tactic) :=
mkElabAttribute Tactic `Lean.Elab.Tactic.tacticElabAttribute `builtinTactic `tactic `Lean.Parser.Tactic `Lean.Elab.Tactic.Tactic "tactic"
@[builtinInit mkTacticAttribute] constant tacticElabAttribute : KeyedDeclsAttribute Tactic
def mkTacticInfo (mctxBefore : MetavarContext) (goalsBefore : List MVarId) (stx : Syntax) : TacticM Info :=
return Info.ofTacticInfo {
elaborator := (← read).elaborator
mctxBefore := mctxBefore
goalsBefore := goalsBefore
stx := stx
mctxAfter := (← getMCtx)
goalsAfter := (← getUnsolvedGoals)
}
def mkInitialTacticInfo (stx : Syntax) : TacticM (TacticM Info) := do
let mctxBefore ← getMCtx
let goalsBefore ← getUnsolvedGoals
return mkTacticInfo mctxBefore goalsBefore stx
@[inline] def withTacticInfoContext (stx : Syntax) (x : TacticM α) : TacticM α := do
withInfoContext x (← mkInitialTacticInfo stx)
/-
Important: we must define `evalTacticUsing` and `expandTacticMacroFns` before we define
the instance `MonadExcept` for `TacticM` since it backtracks the state including error messages,
and this is bad when rethrowing the exception at the `catch` block in these methods.
We marked these places with a `(*)` in these methods.
-/
private def evalTacticUsing (s : SavedState) (stx : Syntax) (tactics : List (KeyedDeclsAttribute.AttributeEntry Tactic)) : TacticM Unit := do
let rec loop
| [] => throwErrorAt stx "unexpected syntax {indentD stx}"
| evalFn::evalFns => do
try
withReader ({ · with elaborator := evalFn.decl }) <| withTacticInfoContext stx <| evalFn.value stx
catch
| ex@(Exception.error _ _) =>
match evalFns with
| [] => throw ex -- (*)
| evalFns => s.restore; loop evalFns
| ex@(Exception.internal id _) =>
if id == unsupportedSyntaxExceptionId then
s.restore; loop evalFns
else
throw ex
loop tactics
mutual
partial def expandTacticMacroFns (stx : Syntax) (macros : List (KeyedDeclsAttribute.AttributeEntry Macro)) : TacticM Unit :=
let rec loop
| [] => throwErrorAt stx "tactic '{stx.getKind}' has not been implemented"
| m::ms => do
let scp ← getCurrMacroScope
try
withReader ({ · with elaborator := m.decl }) do
withTacticInfoContext stx do
let stx' ← adaptMacro m.value stx
evalTactic stx'
catch ex =>
if ms.isEmpty then throw ex -- (*)
loop ms
loop macros
partial def expandTacticMacro (stx : Syntax) : TacticM Unit := do
expandTacticMacroFns stx (macroAttribute.getEntries (← getEnv) stx.getKind)
partial def evalTacticAux (stx : Syntax) : TacticM Unit :=
withRef stx $ withIncRecDepth $ withFreshMacroScope $ match stx with
| Syntax.node k args =>
if k == nullKind then
-- Macro writers create a sequence of tactics `t₁ ... tₙ` using `mkNullNode #[t₁, ..., tₙ]`
stx.getArgs.forM evalTactic
else do
trace[Elab.step] "{stx}"
let s ← Tactic.saveState
match tacticElabAttribute.getEntries (← getEnv) stx.getKind with
| [] => expandTacticMacro stx
| evalFns => evalTacticUsing s stx evalFns
| _ => throwError m!"unexpected tactic{indentD stx}"
partial def evalTactic (stx : Syntax) : TacticM Unit :=
evalTacticAux stx
end
def throwNoGoalsToBeSolved : TacticM α :=
throwError "no goals to be solved"
def done : TacticM Unit := do
let gs ← getUnsolvedGoals
unless gs.isEmpty do
Term.reportUnsolvedGoals gs
throwAbortTactic
def focus (x : TacticM α) : TacticM α := do
let mvarId :: mvarIds ← getUnsolvedGoals | throwNoGoalsToBeSolved
setGoals [mvarId]
let a ← x
let mvarIds' ← getUnsolvedGoals
setGoals (mvarIds' ++ mvarIds)
pure a
def focusAndDone (tactic : TacticM α) : TacticM α :=
focus do
let a ← tactic
done
pure a
/- Close the main goal using the given tactic. If it fails, log the error and `admit` -/
def closeUsingOrAdmit (tac : TacticM Unit) : TacticM Unit := do
/- Important: we must define `closeUsingOrAdmit` before we define
the instance `MonadExcept` for `TacticM` since it backtracks the state including error messages. -/
let mvarId :: mvarIds ← getUnsolvedGoals | throwNoGoalsToBeSolved
try
focusAndDone tac
catch ex =>
logException ex
admitGoal mvarId
setGoals mvarIds
instance : MonadBacktrack SavedState TacticM where
saveState := Tactic.saveState
restoreState b := b.restore
@[inline] protected def tryCatch {α} (x : TacticM α) (h : Exception → TacticM α) : TacticM α := do
let b ← saveState
try x catch ex => b.restore; h ex
instance : MonadExcept Exception TacticM where
throw := throw
tryCatch := Tactic.tryCatch
@[inline] protected def orElse {α} (x y : TacticM α) : TacticM α := do
try x catch _ => y
instance {α} : OrElse (TacticM α) where
orElse := Tactic.orElse
/-
Save the current tactic state for a token `stx`.
This method is a no-op if `stx` has no position information.
We use this method to save the tactic state at punctuation such as `;`
-/
def saveTacticInfoForToken (stx : Syntax) : TacticM Unit := do
unless stx.getPos?.isNone do
withTacticInfoContext stx (pure ())
/- Elaborate `x` with `stx` on the macro stack -/
@[inline]
def withMacroExpansion {α} (beforeStx afterStx : Syntax) (x : TacticM α) : TacticM α :=
withMacroExpansionInfo beforeStx afterStx do
withTheReader Term.Context (fun ctx => { ctx with macroStack := { before := beforeStx, after := afterStx } :: ctx.macroStack }) x
/-- Adapt a syntax transformation to a regular tactic evaluator. -/
def adaptExpander (exp : Syntax → TacticM Syntax) : Tactic := fun stx => do
let stx' ← exp stx
withMacroExpansion stx stx' $ evalTactic stx'
def appendGoals (mvarIds : List MVarId) : TacticM Unit :=
modify fun s => { s with goals := s.goals ++ mvarIds }
def replaceMainGoal (mvarIds : List MVarId) : TacticM Unit := do
let (mvarId :: mvarIds') ← getGoals | throwNoGoalsToBeSolved
modify fun s => { s with goals := mvarIds ++ mvarIds' }
/-- Return the first goal. -/
def getMainGoal : TacticM MVarId := do
loop (← getGoals)
where
loop : List MVarId → TacticM MVarId
| [] => throwNoGoalsToBeSolved
| mvarId :: mvarIds => do
if (← isExprMVarAssigned mvarId) then
loop mvarIds
else
setGoals (mvarId :: mvarIds)
return mvarId
/-- Return the main goal metavariable declaration. -/
def getMainDecl : TacticM MetavarDecl := do
getMVarDecl (← getMainGoal)
/-- Return the main goal tag. -/
def getMainTag : TacticM Name :=
return (← getMainDecl).userName
/-- Return expected type for the main goal. -/
def getMainTarget : TacticM Expr := do
instantiateMVars (← getMainDecl).type
/-- Execute `x` using the main goal local context and instances -/
def withMainContext (x : TacticM α) : TacticM α := do
withMVarContext (← getMainGoal) x
/-- Evaluate `tac` at `mvarId`, and return the list of resulting subgoals. -/
def evalTacticAt (tac : Syntax) (mvarId : MVarId) : TacticM (List MVarId) := do
let gs ← getGoals
try
setGoals [mvarId]
evalTactic tac
pruneSolvedGoals
getGoals
finally
setGoals gs
def ensureHasNoMVars (e : Expr) : TacticM Unit := do
let e ← instantiateMVars e
let pendingMVars ← getMVars e
discard <| Term.logUnassignedUsingErrorInfos pendingMVars
if e.hasExprMVar then
throwError "tactic failed, resulting expression contains metavariables{indentExpr e}"
/-- Close main goal using the given expression. If `checkUnassigned == true`, then `val` must not contain unassinged metavariables. -/
def closeMainGoal (val : Expr) (checkUnassigned := true): TacticM Unit := do
if checkUnassigned then
ensureHasNoMVars val
assignExprMVar (← getMainGoal) val
replaceMainGoal []
@[inline] def liftMetaMAtMain (x : MVarId → MetaM α) : TacticM α := do
withMainContext do x (← getMainGoal)
@[inline] def liftMetaTacticAux (tac : MVarId → MetaM (α × List MVarId)) : TacticM α := do
withMainContext do
let (a, mvarIds) ← tac (← getMainGoal)
replaceMainGoal mvarIds
pure a
@[inline] def liftMetaTactic (tactic : MVarId → MetaM (List MVarId)) : TacticM Unit :=
liftMetaTacticAux fun mvarId => do
let gs ← tactic mvarId
pure ((), gs)
@[inline] def liftMetaTactic1 (tactic : MVarId → MetaM (Option MVarId)) : TacticM Unit :=
withMainContext do
if let some mvarId ← tactic (← getMainGoal) then
replaceMainGoal [mvarId]
else
replaceMainGoal []
def tryTactic? (tactic : TacticM α) : TacticM (Option α) := do
try
pure (some (← tactic))
catch _ =>
pure none
def tryTactic (tactic : TacticM α) : TacticM Bool := do
try
discard tactic
pure true
catch _ =>
pure false
/--
Use `parentTag` to tag untagged goals at `newGoals`.
If there are multiple new untagged goals, they are named using `<parentTag>.<newSuffix>_<idx>` where `idx > 0`.
If there is only one new untagged goal, then we just use `parentTag` -/
def tagUntaggedGoals (parentTag : Name) (newSuffix : Name) (newGoals : List MVarId) : TacticM Unit := do
let mctx ← getMCtx
let mut numAnonymous := 0
for g in newGoals do
if mctx.isAnonymousMVar g then
numAnonymous := numAnonymous + 1
modifyMCtx fun mctx => do
let mut mctx := mctx
let mut idx := 1
for g in newGoals do
if mctx.isAnonymousMVar g then
if numAnonymous == 1 then
mctx := mctx.renameMVar g parentTag
else
mctx := mctx.renameMVar g (parentTag ++ newSuffix.appendIndexAfter idx)
idx := idx + 1
pure mctx
/- Recall that `ident' := ident <|> Term.hole` -/
def getNameOfIdent' (id : Syntax) : Name :=
if id.isIdent then id.getId else `_
def getFVarId (id : Syntax) : TacticM FVarId := withRef id do
let fvar? ← Term.isLocalIdent? id;
match fvar? with
| some fvar => pure fvar.fvarId!
| none => throwError "unknown variable '{id.getId}'"
def getFVarIds (ids : Array Syntax) : TacticM (Array FVarId) := do
withMainContext do ids.mapM getFVarId
/--
Use position of `=> $body` for error messages.
If there is a line break before `body`, the message will be displayed on `=>` only,
but the "full range" for the info view will still include `body`. -/
def withCaseRef [Monad m] [MonadRef m] (arrow body : Syntax) (x : m α) : m α :=
withRef (mkNullNode #[arrow, body]) x
builtin_initialize registerTraceClass `Elab.tactic
end Lean.Elab.Tactic
|
bb7bcaa100a5c7226a85b7c6f07e57b8ffdbb013 | 618003631150032a5676f229d13a079ac875ff77 | /src/data/real/pi.lean | d053659b3fc6ea9c2372f0f3e0ae6d1b81e52ea1 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | awainverse/mathlib | 939b68c8486df66cfda64d327ad3d9165248c777 | ea76bd8f3ca0a8bf0a166a06a475b10663dec44a | refs/heads/master | 1,659,592,962,036 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 268,436,019 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,590,990,500,000 | 1,590,990,500,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,559 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric
namespace real
variable (x : ℝ)
/-- the series `sqrt_two_add_series x n` is `sqrt(2 + sqrt(2 + ... ))` with `n` square roots,
starting with `x`. We define it here because `cos (pi / 2 ^ (n+1)) = sqrt_two_add_series 0 n / 2`
-/
@[simp] noncomputable def sqrt_two_add_series (x : ℝ) : ℕ → ℝ
| 0 := x
| (n+1) := sqrt (2 + sqrt_two_add_series n)
lemma sqrt_two_add_series_zero : sqrt_two_add_series x 0 = x := by simp
lemma sqrt_two_add_series_one : sqrt_two_add_series 0 1 = sqrt 2 := by simp
lemma sqrt_two_add_series_two : sqrt_two_add_series 0 2 = sqrt (2 + sqrt 2) := by simp
lemma sqrt_two_add_series_zero_nonneg : ∀(n : ℕ), sqrt_two_add_series 0 n ≥ 0
| 0 := le_refl 0
| (n+1) := sqrt_nonneg _
lemma sqrt_two_add_series_nonneg {x : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) : ∀(n : ℕ), sqrt_two_add_series x n ≥ 0
| 0 := h
| (n+1) := sqrt_nonneg _
lemma sqrt_two_add_series_lt_two : ∀(n : ℕ), sqrt_two_add_series 0 n < 2
| 0 := by norm_num
| (n+1) :=
begin
refine lt_of_lt_of_le _ (le_of_eq $ sqrt_sqr $ le_of_lt two_pos),
rw [sqrt_two_add_series, sqrt_lt],
apply add_lt_of_lt_sub_left,
apply lt_of_lt_of_le (sqrt_two_add_series_lt_two n),
norm_num, apply add_nonneg, norm_num, apply sqrt_two_add_series_zero_nonneg, norm_num
end
lemma sqrt_two_add_series_succ (x : ℝ) :
∀(n : ℕ), sqrt_two_add_series x (n+1) = sqrt_two_add_series (sqrt (2 + x)) n
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := by rw [sqrt_two_add_series, sqrt_two_add_series_succ, sqrt_two_add_series]
lemma sqrt_two_add_series_monotone_left {x y : ℝ} (h : x ≤ y) :
∀(n : ℕ), sqrt_two_add_series x n ≤ sqrt_two_add_series y n
| 0 := h
| (n+1) :=
begin
rw [sqrt_two_add_series, sqrt_two_add_series],
apply sqrt_le_sqrt, apply add_le_add_left, apply sqrt_two_add_series_monotone_left
end
@[simp] lemma cos_pi_over_two_pow : ∀(n : ℕ), cos (pi / 2 ^ (n+1)) = sqrt_two_add_series 0 n / 2
| 0 := by simp
| (n+1) :=
begin
symmetry, rw [div_eq_iff_mul_eq], symmetry,
rw [sqrt_two_add_series, sqrt_eq_iff_sqr_eq, mul_pow, cos_square, ←mul_div_assoc,
nat.add_succ, pow_succ, mul_div_mul_left, cos_pi_over_two_pow, add_mul],
congr, norm_num,
rw [mul_comm, pow_two, mul_assoc, ←mul_div_assoc, mul_div_cancel_left, ←mul_div_assoc,
mul_div_cancel_left],
norm_num, norm_num, norm_num,
apply add_nonneg, norm_num, apply sqrt_two_add_series_zero_nonneg, norm_num,
apply le_of_lt, apply cos_pos_of_neg_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two,
{ transitivity (0 : ℝ), rw neg_lt_zero, apply pi_div_two_pos,
apply div_pos pi_pos, apply pow_pos, norm_num },
apply div_lt_div' (le_refl pi) _ pi_pos _,
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (le_of_eq (pow_one _).symm) _,
apply pow_lt_pow, norm_num, apply nat.succ_lt_succ, apply nat.succ_pos, all_goals {norm_num}
end
lemma sin_square_pi_over_two_pow (n : ℕ) :
sin (pi / 2 ^ (n+1)) ^ 2 = 1 - (sqrt_two_add_series 0 n / 2) ^ 2 :=
by rw [sin_square, cos_pi_over_two_pow]
lemma sin_square_pi_over_two_pow_succ (n : ℕ) :
sin (pi / 2 ^ (n+2)) ^ 2 = 1 / 2 - sqrt_two_add_series 0 n / 4 :=
begin
rw [sin_square_pi_over_two_pow, sqrt_two_add_series, div_pow, sqr_sqrt, add_div, ←sub_sub],
congr, norm_num, norm_num, apply add_nonneg, norm_num, apply sqrt_two_add_series_zero_nonneg,
end
@[simp] lemma sin_pi_over_two_pow_succ (n : ℕ) :
sin (pi / 2 ^ (n+2)) = sqrt (2 - sqrt_two_add_series 0 n) / 2 :=
begin
symmetry, rw [div_eq_iff_mul_eq], symmetry,
rw [sqrt_eq_iff_sqr_eq, mul_pow, sin_square_pi_over_two_pow_succ, sub_mul],
{ congr, norm_num, rw [mul_comm], convert mul_div_cancel' _ _, norm_num, norm_num },
{ rw [sub_nonneg], apply le_of_lt, apply sqrt_two_add_series_lt_two },
apply le_of_lt, apply mul_pos, apply sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi,
{ apply div_pos pi_pos, apply pow_pos, norm_num },
refine lt_of_lt_of_le _ (le_of_eq (div_one _)), rw [div_lt_div_left],
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (le_of_eq (pow_zero 2).symm) _,
apply pow_lt_pow, norm_num, apply nat.succ_pos, apply pi_pos,
apply pow_pos, all_goals {norm_num}
end
lemma cos_pi_div_four : cos (pi / 4) = sqrt 2 / 2 :=
by { transitivity cos (pi / 2 ^ 2), congr, norm_num, simp }
lemma sin_pi_div_four : sin (pi / 4) = sqrt 2 / 2 :=
by { transitivity sin (pi / 2 ^ 2), congr, norm_num, simp }
lemma cos_pi_div_eight : cos (pi / 8) = sqrt (2 + sqrt 2) / 2 :=
by { transitivity cos (pi / 2 ^ 3), congr, norm_num, simp }
lemma sin_pi_div_eight : sin (pi / 8) = sqrt (2 - sqrt 2) / 2 :=
by { transitivity sin (pi / 2 ^ 3), congr, norm_num, simp }
lemma cos_pi_div_sixteen : cos (pi / 16) = sqrt (2 + sqrt (2 + sqrt 2)) / 2 :=
by { transitivity cos (pi / 2 ^ 4), congr, norm_num, simp }
lemma sin_pi_div_sixteen : sin (pi / 16) = sqrt (2 - sqrt (2 + sqrt 2)) / 2 :=
by { transitivity sin (pi / 2 ^ 4), congr, norm_num, simp }
lemma cos_pi_div_thirty_two : cos (pi / 32) = sqrt (2 + sqrt (2 + sqrt (2 + sqrt 2))) / 2 :=
by { transitivity cos (pi / 2 ^ 5), congr, norm_num, simp }
lemma sin_pi_div_thirty_two : sin (pi / 32) = sqrt (2 - sqrt (2 + sqrt (2 + sqrt 2))) / 2 :=
by { transitivity sin (pi / 2 ^ 5), congr, norm_num, simp }
lemma pi_gt_sqrt_two_add_series (n : ℕ) : pi > 2 ^ (n+1) * sqrt (2 - sqrt_two_add_series 0 n) :=
begin
have : pi > sqrt (2 - sqrt_two_add_series 0 n) / 2 * 2 ^ (n+2),
{ apply mul_lt_of_lt_div, apply pow_pos, norm_num,
rw [←sin_pi_over_two_pow_succ], apply sin_lt, apply div_pos pi_pos, apply pow_pos, norm_num },
apply lt_of_le_of_lt (le_of_eq _) this,
rw [pow_succ _ (n+1), ←mul_assoc, div_mul_cancel, mul_comm], norm_num
end
lemma pi_lt_sqrt_two_add_series (n : ℕ) :
pi < 2 ^ (n+1) * sqrt (2 - sqrt_two_add_series 0 n) + 1 / 4 ^ n :=
begin
have : pi < (sqrt (2 - sqrt_two_add_series 0 n) / 2 + 1 / (2 ^ n) ^ 3 / 4) * 2 ^ (n+2),
{ rw [←div_lt_iff, ←sin_pi_over_two_pow_succ],
refine lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_add_of_sub_right_lt (sin_gt_sub_cube _ _)) _,
{ apply div_pos pi_pos, apply pow_pos, norm_num },
{ apply div_le_of_le_mul, apply pow_pos, norm_num, refine le_trans pi_le_four _,
simp only [show ((4 : ℝ) = 2 ^ 2), by norm_num, mul_one],
apply pow_le_pow, norm_num, apply le_add_of_nonneg_left, apply nat.zero_le },
apply add_le_add_left, rw div_le_div_right,
apply le_div_of_mul_le, apply pow_pos, apply pow_pos, norm_num,
rw [←mul_pow],
refine le_trans _ (le_of_eq (one_pow 3)), apply pow_le_pow_of_le_left,
{ apply le_of_lt, apply mul_pos, apply div_pos pi_pos, apply pow_pos, norm_num, apply pow_pos,
norm_num },
apply mul_le_of_le_div, apply pow_pos, norm_num,
refine le_trans ((div_le_div_right _).mpr pi_le_four) _, apply pow_pos, norm_num,
rw [pow_succ, pow_succ, ←mul_assoc, ←div_div_eq_div_mul],
convert le_refl _, norm_num, norm_num,
apply pow_pos, norm_num },
apply lt_of_lt_of_le this (le_of_eq _), rw [add_mul], congr' 1,
{ rw [pow_succ _ (n+1), ←mul_assoc, div_mul_cancel, mul_comm], norm_num },
rw [pow_succ, ←pow_mul, mul_comm n 2, pow_mul, show (2 : ℝ) ^ 2 = 4, by norm_num, pow_succ,
pow_succ, ←mul_assoc (2 : ℝ), show (2 : ℝ) * 2 = 4, by norm_num, ←mul_assoc, div_mul_cancel,
mul_comm ((2 : ℝ) ^ n), ←div_div_eq_div_mul, div_mul_cancel],
apply pow_ne_zero, norm_num, norm_num
end
/-- From an upper bound on `sqrt_two_add_series 0 n = 2 cos (pi / 2 ^ (n+1))` of the form
`sqrt_two_add_series 0 n ≤ 2 - (a / 2 ^ (n + 1)) ^ 2)`, one can deduce the lower bound `a < pi`
thanks to basic trigonometric inequalities as expressed in `pi_gt_sqrt_two_add_series`. -/
theorem pi_lower_bound_start (n : ℕ) {a}
(h : sqrt_two_add_series ((0:ℕ) / (1:ℕ)) n ≤ 2 - (a / 2 ^ (n + 1)) ^ 2) : a < pi :=
begin
refine lt_of_le_of_lt _ (pi_gt_sqrt_two_add_series n), rw [mul_comm],
refine le_mul_of_div_le (pow_pos (by norm_num) _) (le_sqrt_of_sqr_le _),
rwa [le_sub, show (0:ℝ) = (0:ℕ)/(1:ℕ), by rw [nat.cast_zero, zero_div]],
end
lemma sqrt_two_add_series_step_up (c d : ℕ) {a b n : ℕ} {z : ℝ}
(hz : sqrt_two_add_series (c/d) n ≤ z) (hb : 0 < b) (hd : 0 < d)
(h : (2 * b + a) * d ^ 2 ≤ c ^ 2 * b) : sqrt_two_add_series (a/b) (n+1) ≤ z :=
begin
refine le_trans _ hz, rw sqrt_two_add_series_succ, apply sqrt_two_add_series_monotone_left,
have hb' : 0 < (b:ℝ) := nat.cast_pos.2 hb,
have hd' : 0 < (d:ℝ) := nat.cast_pos.2 hd,
rw [sqrt_le_left (div_nonneg (nat.cast_nonneg _) hd'), div_pow,
add_div_eq_mul_add_div _ _ (ne_of_gt hb'), div_le_div_iff hb' (pow_pos hd' _)],
exact_mod_cast h
end
/-- Create a proof of `a < pi` for a fixed rational number `a`, given a witness, which is a
sequence of rational numbers `sqrt 2 < r 1 < r 2 < ... < r n < 2` satisfying the property that
`sqrt (2 + r i) ≤ r(i+1)`, where `r 0 = 0` and `sqrt (2 - r n) ≥ a/2^(n+1)`. -/
meta def pi_lower_bound (l : list ℚ) : tactic unit :=
do let n := l.length,
tactic.apply `(@pi_lower_bound_start %%(reflect n)),
l.mmap' (λ r, do
let a := r.num.to_nat, let b := r.denom,
(() <$ tactic.apply `(@sqrt_two_add_series_step_up %%(reflect a) %%(reflect b)));
[tactic.skip, `[norm_num1], `[norm_num1], `[norm_num1]]),
`[simp only [sqrt_two_add_series, nat.cast_bit0, nat.cast_bit1, nat.cast_one, nat.cast_zero]],
`[norm_num1]
/-- From a lower bound on `sqrt_two_add_series 0 n = 2 cos (pi / 2 ^ (n+1))` of the form
`2 - ((a - 1 / 4 ^ n) / 2 ^ (n + 1)) ^ 2 ≤ sqrt_two_add_series 0 n`, one can deduce the upper bound
`pi < a` thanks to basic trigonometric formulas as expressed in `pi_lt_sqrt_two_add_series`. -/
theorem pi_upper_bound_start (n : ℕ) {a}
(h : 2 - ((a - 1 / 4 ^ n) / 2 ^ (n + 1)) ^ 2 ≤ sqrt_two_add_series ((0:ℕ) / (1:ℕ)) n)
(h₂ : 1 / 4 ^ n ≤ a) : pi < a :=
begin
refine lt_of_lt_of_le (pi_lt_sqrt_two_add_series n) _,
rw [← le_sub_iff_add_le, ← le_div_iff', sqrt_le_left, sub_le],
{ rwa [nat.cast_zero, zero_div] at h },
{ exact div_nonneg (sub_nonneg.2 h₂) (pow_pos two_pos _) },
{ exact pow_pos two_pos _ }
end
lemma sqrt_two_add_series_step_down (a b : ℕ) {c d n : ℕ} {z : ℝ}
(hz : z ≤ sqrt_two_add_series (a/b) n) (hb : 0 < b) (hd : 0 < d)
(h : a ^ 2 * d ≤ (2 * d + c) * b ^ 2) : z ≤ sqrt_two_add_series (c/d) (n+1) :=
begin
apply le_trans hz, rw sqrt_two_add_series_succ, apply sqrt_two_add_series_monotone_left,
apply le_sqrt_of_sqr_le,
have hb' : 0 < (b:ℝ) := nat.cast_pos.2 hb,
have hd' : 0 < (d:ℝ) := nat.cast_pos.2 hd,
rw [div_pow, add_div_eq_mul_add_div _ _ (ne_of_gt hd'), div_le_div_iff (pow_pos hb' _) hd'],
exact_mod_cast h
end
/-- Create a proof of `pi < a` for a fixed rational number `a`, given a witness, which is a
sequence of rational numbers `sqrt 2 < r 1 < r 2 < ... < r n < 2` satisfying the property that
`sqrt (2 + r i) ≥ r(i+1)`, where `r 0 = 0` and `sqrt (2 - r n) ≥ (a - 1/4^n) / 2^(n+1)`. -/
meta def pi_upper_bound (l : list ℚ) : tactic unit :=
do let n := l.length,
(() <$ tactic.apply `(@pi_upper_bound_start %%(reflect n))); [pure (), `[norm_num1]],
l.mmap' (λ r, do
let a := r.num.to_nat, let b := r.denom,
(() <$ tactic.apply `(@sqrt_two_add_series_step_down %%(reflect a) %%(reflect b)));
[pure (), `[norm_num1], `[norm_num1], `[norm_num1]]),
`[simp only [sqrt_two_add_series, nat.cast_bit0, nat.cast_bit1, nat.cast_one, nat.cast_zero]],
`[norm_num]
lemma pi_gt_three : 3 < pi := by pi_lower_bound [23/16]
lemma pi_gt_314 : 3.14 < pi := by pi_lower_bound [99/70, 874/473, 1940/989, 1447/727]
lemma pi_lt_315 : pi < 3.15 := by pi_upper_bound [140/99, 279/151, 51/26, 412/207]
lemma pi_gt_31415 : 3.1415 < pi := by pi_lower_bound [
11482/8119, 5401/2923, 2348/1197, 11367/5711, 25705/12868, 23235/11621]
lemma pi_lt_31416 : pi < 3.1416 := by pi_upper_bound [
4756/3363, 101211/54775, 505534/257719, 83289/41846,
411278/205887, 438142/219137, 451504/225769, 265603/132804, 849938/424971]
lemma pi_gt_3141592 : 3.141592 < pi := by pi_lower_bound [
11482/8119, 7792/4217, 54055/27557, 949247/476920, 3310126/1657059,
2635492/1318143, 1580265/790192, 1221775/610899, 3612247/1806132, 849943/424972]
lemma pi_lt_3141593 : pi < 3.141593 := by pi_upper_bound [
27720/19601, 56935/30813, 49359/25163, 258754/130003, 113599/56868, 1101994/551163,
8671537/4336095, 3877807/1938940, 52483813/26242030, 56946167/28473117, 23798415/11899211]
end real
|
9e43b14a0c1e9f3f2dee4820513949f6098d9ad1 | df561f413cfe0a88b1056655515399c546ff32a5 | /8-inequality-world/l5.lean | db45687e1f7a743ea2d4a80769df0bfabc335702 | [] | no_license | nicholaspun/natural-number-game-solutions | 31d5158415c6f582694680044c5c6469032c2a06 | 1e2aed86d2e76a3f4a275c6d99e795ad30cf6df0 | refs/heads/main | 1,675,123,625,012 | 1,607,633,548,000 | 1,607,633,548,000 | 318,933,860 | 3 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 177 | lean | theorem le_trans (a b c : mynat) (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ≤ c :=
begin
cases hab with d hd,
cases hbc with e he,
use (d + e),
rw he,
rw hd,
rw add_assoc,
refl,
end |
cdcd02a1b25593adcd95c711188a836f42d6e2b0 | 1446f520c1db37e157b631385707cc28a17a595e | /stage0/src/Init/Data/Option/Basic.lean | b1c2f156e102cb79460038ad9876352535badea9 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | bdbabiak/lean4 | cab06b8a2606d99a168dd279efdd404edb4e825a | 3f4d0d78b2ce3ef541cb643bbe21496bd6b057ac | refs/heads/master | 1,615,045,275,530 | 1,583,793,696,000 | 1,583,793,696,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,135 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Core
import Init.Control.Monad
import Init.Control.Alternative
import Init.Coe
open Decidable
universes u v
namespace Option
def toMonad {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] [Alternative m] {A} : Option A → m A
| none => failure
| some a => pure a
@[macroInline] def getD {α : Type u} : Option α → α → α
| some x, _ => x
| none, e => e
@[inline] def toBool {α : Type u} : Option α → Bool
| some _ => true
| none => false
@[inline] def isSome {α : Type u} : Option α → Bool
| some _ => true
| none => false
@[inline] def isNone {α : Type u} : Option α → Bool
| some _ => false
| none => true
@[inline] protected def bind {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : Option α → (α → Option β) → Option β
| none, b => none
| some a, b => b a
@[inline] protected def map {α β} (f : α → β) (o : Option α) : Option β :=
Option.bind o (some ∘ f)
theorem mapId {α} : (Option.map id : Option α → Option α) = id :=
funext (fun o => match o with | none => rfl | some x => rfl)
instance : Monad Option :=
{pure := @some, bind := @Option.bind, map := @Option.map}
@[inline] protected def filter {α} (p : α → Bool) : Option α → Option α
| some a => if p a then some a else none
| none => none
@[macroInline] protected def orelse {α : Type u} : Option α → Option α → Option α
| some a, _ => some a
| none, b => b
/- Remark: when using the polymorphic notation `a <|> b` is not a `[macroInline]`.
Thus, `a <|> b` will make `Option.orelse` to behave like it was marked as `[inline]`. -/
instance : Alternative Option :=
{ failure := @none,
orelse := @Option.orelse,
..Option.Monad }
@[inline] protected def lt {α : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) : Option α → Option α → Prop
| none, some x => True
| some x, some y => r x y
| _, _ => False
instance decidableRelLt {α : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) [s : DecidableRel r] : DecidableRel (Option.lt r)
| none, some y => isTrue trivial
| some x, some y => s x y
| some x, none => isFalse notFalse
| none, none => isFalse notFalse
end Option
instance (α : Type u) : Inhabited (Option α) :=
⟨none⟩
instance {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] : DecidableEq (Option α) :=
fun a b => match a, b with
| none, none => isTrue rfl
| none, (some v₂) => isFalse (fun h => Option.noConfusion h)
| (some v₁), none => isFalse (fun h => Option.noConfusion h)
| (some v₁), (some v₂) =>
match decEq v₁ v₂ with
| (isTrue e) => isTrue (congrArg (@some α) e)
| (isFalse n) => isFalse (fun h => Option.noConfusion h (fun e => absurd e n))
instance {α : Type u} [HasBeq α] : HasBeq (Option α) :=
⟨fun a b => match a, b with
| none, none => true
| none, (some v₂) => false
| (some v₁), none => false
| (some v₁), (some v₂) => v₁ == v₂⟩
instance {α : Type u} [HasLess α] : HasLess (Option α) := ⟨Option.lt HasLess.Less⟩
|
2eecbccfadd7e974dc5d1c05a0a0cfe31f91cee3 | cabd1ea95170493667c024ef2045eb86d981b133 | /src/super/prover.lean | dd3e1c09723803f77a248531e1a08301bba43cfc | [] | no_license | semorrison/super | 31db4b5aa5ef4c2313dc5803b8c79a95f809815b | 0c6c03ba9c7470f801eb4d055294f424ff090308 | refs/heads/master | 1,630,272,140,541 | 1,511,054,739,000 | 1,511,054,756,000 | 114,317,807 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,513,304,776,000 | 1,513,304,775,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,649 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Gabriel Ebner. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Gabriel Ebner
-/
import .clause .prover_state
import .misc_preprocessing
import .selection
import .trim
-- default inferences
-- 0
import .clausifier
-- 10
import .demod
import .inhabited
import .datatypes
-- 20
import .subsumption
-- 30
import .splitting
-- 40
import .factoring
import .resolution
import .superposition
import .equality
import .simp
import .defs
open monad tactic expr
declare_trace super
namespace super
meta def trace_clauses : prover unit :=
do state ← state_t.read, trace state
meta def run_prover_loop
(literal_selection : selection_strategy)
(clause_selection : clause_selection_strategy)
(preprocessing_rules : list (prover unit))
(inference_rules : list inference)
: ℕ → prover (option expr) | i := do
sequence' preprocessing_rules,
new ← take_newly_derived, new.mmap' register_as_passive,
when (is_trace_enabled_for `super) $ new.mmap' $ λn,
tactic.trace { n with c := { (n.c) with proof := const (mk_simple_name "derived") [] } },
needs_sat_run ← flip monad.lift state_t.read (λst, st.needs_sat_run),
if needs_sat_run then do
res ← do_sat_run,
match res with
| some proof := return (some proof)
| none := do
model ← flip monad.lift state_t.read (λst, st.current_model),
when (is_trace_enabled_for `super) (do
pp_model ← pp (model.to_list.map (λlit, if lit.2 = tt then lit.1 else `(not %%lit.1))),
trace $ to_fmt "sat model: " ++ pp_model),
run_prover_loop i
end
else do
passive ← get_passive,
if passive.size = 0 then return none else do
given_name ← clause_selection i,
given ← option.to_monad (passive.find given_name),
-- trace_clauses,
remove_passive given_name,
given ← literal_selection given,
when (is_trace_enabled_for `super) (do
fmt ← pp given, trace (to_fmt "given: " ++ fmt)),
add_active given,
seq_inferences inference_rules given,
run_prover_loop (i+1)
meta def default_preprocessing : list (prover unit) :=
[
clausify_pre,
clause_normalize_pre,
factor_dup_lits_pre,
remove_duplicates_pre,
refl_r_pre,
diff_constr_eq_l_pre,
tautology_removal_pre,
subsumption_interreduction_pre,
forward_subsumption_pre,
return ()
]
end super
open super
meta def super (sos_lemmas : list expr) : tactic unit := with_trim $ do
as_refutation, local_false ← target,
clauses ← clauses_of_context,
sos_clauses ← sos_lemmas.mmap (clause.of_proof local_false),
initial_state ← prover_state.initial local_false (clauses ++ sos_clauses),
inf_names ← attribute.get_instances `super.inf,
infs ← inf_names.mmap $ λn, eval_expr inf_decl (const n []),
infs ← return $ list.map inf_decl.inf $ list.sort_on inf_decl.prio infs,
res ← run_prover_loop selection21 (age_weight_clause_selection 3 4)
default_preprocessing infs
0 initial_state,
match res with
| (some empty_clause, st) := apply empty_clause
| (none, saturation) := do sat_fmt ← pp saturation,
fail $ to_fmt "saturation:" ++ format.line ++ sat_fmt
end
namespace tactic.interactive
open lean.parser
open interactive
open interactive.types
meta def with_lemmas (ls : parse $ many ident) : tactic unit := ls.mmap' $ λl, do
p ← mk_const l,
t ← infer_type p,
n ← get_unused_name p.get_app_fn.const_name none,
tactic.assertv n t p
meta def super (extra_clause_names : parse $ many ident)
(extra_lemma_names : parse with_ident_list) : tactic unit := do
with_lemmas extra_clause_names,
extra_lemmas ← extra_lemma_names.mmap mk_const,
_root_.super extra_lemmas
end tactic.interactive
|
3d70bf67fbcf125c323ac2a219d80443fd32e01c | 9dc8cecdf3c4634764a18254e94d43da07142918 | /src/measure_theory/integral/mean_inequalities.lean | ea58ec559bf9cccb61311cdf8e5bc31b7edeedb5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcommelin/mathlib | d8456447c36c176e14d96d9e76f39841f69d2d9b | ee8279351a2e434c2852345c51b728d22af5a156 | refs/heads/master | 1,664,782,136,488 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 132,563,656 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,663,599,929,000 | 1,525,760,539,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 19,528 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import measure_theory.integral.lebesgue
import analysis.mean_inequalities
import analysis.mean_inequalities_pow
import measure_theory.function.special_functions
/-!
# Mean value inequalities for integrals
In this file we prove several inequalities on integrals, notably the Hölder inequality and
the Minkowski inequality. The versions for finite sums are in `analysis.mean_inequalities`.
## Main results
Hölder's inequality for the Lebesgue integral of `ℝ≥0∞` and `ℝ≥0` functions: we prove
`∫ (f * g) ∂μ ≤ (∫ f^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) * (∫ g^q ∂μ) ^ (1/q)` for `p`, `q` conjugate real exponents
and `α→(e)nnreal` functions in two cases,
* `ennreal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq` : ℝ≥0∞ functions,
* `nnreal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq` : ℝ≥0 functions.
Minkowski's inequality for the Lebesgue integral of measurable functions with `ℝ≥0∞` values:
we prove `(∫ (f + g)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) ≤ (∫ f^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) + (∫ g^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p)` for `1 ≤ p`.
-/
section lintegral
/-!
### Hölder's inequality for the Lebesgue integral of ℝ≥0∞ and nnreal functions
We prove `∫ (f * g) ∂μ ≤ (∫ f^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) * (∫ g^q ∂μ) ^ (1/q)` for `p`, `q`
conjugate real exponents and `α→(e)nnreal` functions in several cases, the first two being useful
only to prove the more general results:
* `ennreal.lintegral_mul_le_one_of_lintegral_rpow_eq_one` : ℝ≥0∞ functions for which the
integrals on the right are equal to 1,
* `ennreal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq_of_ne_zero_of_ne_top` : ℝ≥0∞ functions for which the
integrals on the right are neither ⊤ nor 0,
* `ennreal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq` : ℝ≥0∞ functions,
* `nnreal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq` : nnreal functions.
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical big_operators nnreal ennreal
open measure_theory
variables {α : Type*} [measurable_space α] {μ : measure α}
namespace ennreal
lemma lintegral_mul_le_one_of_lintegral_rpow_eq_one {p q : ℝ} (hpq : p.is_conjugate_exponent q)
{f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) (hf_norm : ∫⁻ a, (f a)^p ∂μ = 1)
(hg_norm : ∫⁻ a, (g a)^q ∂μ = 1) :
∫⁻ a, (f * g) a ∂μ ≤ 1 :=
begin
calc ∫⁻ (a : α), ((f * g) a) ∂μ
≤ ∫⁻ (a : α), ((f a)^p / ennreal.of_real p + (g a)^q / ennreal.of_real q) ∂μ :
lintegral_mono (λ a, young_inequality (f a) (g a) hpq)
... = 1 :
begin
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv],
rw lintegral_add_left',
{ rw [lintegral_mul_const'' _ (hf.pow_const p), lintegral_mul_const', hf_norm, hg_norm,
← div_eq_mul_inv, ← div_eq_mul_inv, hpq.inv_add_inv_conj_ennreal],
simp [hpq.symm.pos], },
{ exact (hf.pow_const _).mul_const _, },
end
end
/-- Function multiplied by the inverse of its p-seminorm `(∫⁻ f^p ∂μ) ^ 1/p`-/
def fun_mul_inv_snorm (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (p : ℝ) (μ : measure α) : α → ℝ≥0∞ :=
λ a, (f a) * ((∫⁻ c, (f c) ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p))⁻¹
lemma fun_eq_fun_mul_inv_snorm_mul_snorm {p : ℝ} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞)
(hf_nonzero : ∫⁻ a, (f a) ^ p ∂μ ≠ 0) (hf_top : ∫⁻ a, (f a) ^ p ∂μ ≠ ⊤) {a : α} :
f a = (fun_mul_inv_snorm f p μ a) * (∫⁻ c, (f c)^p ∂μ)^(1/p) :=
by simp [fun_mul_inv_snorm, mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel, hf_nonzero, hf_top]
lemma fun_mul_inv_snorm_rpow {p : ℝ} (hp0 : 0 < p) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a : α} :
(fun_mul_inv_snorm f p μ a) ^ p = (f a)^p * (∫⁻ c, (f c) ^ p ∂μ)⁻¹ :=
begin
rw [fun_mul_inv_snorm, mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ (le_of_lt hp0)],
suffices h_inv_rpow : ((∫⁻ (c : α), f c ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p))⁻¹ ^ p = (∫⁻ (c : α), f c ^ p ∂μ)⁻¹,
by rw h_inv_rpow,
rw [inv_rpow, ← rpow_mul, one_div_mul_cancel hp0.ne', rpow_one]
end
lemma lintegral_rpow_fun_mul_inv_snorm_eq_one {p : ℝ} (hp0_lt : 0 < p) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf_nonzero : ∫⁻ a, (f a)^p ∂μ ≠ 0) (hf_top : ∫⁻ a, (f a)^p ∂μ ≠ ⊤) :
∫⁻ c, (fun_mul_inv_snorm f p μ c)^p ∂μ = 1 :=
begin
simp_rw fun_mul_inv_snorm_rpow hp0_lt,
rw [lintegral_mul_const', mul_inv_cancel hf_nonzero hf_top],
rwa inv_ne_top
end
/-- Hölder's inequality in case of finite non-zero integrals -/
lemma lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq_of_ne_zero_of_ne_top {p q : ℝ} (hpq : p.is_conjugate_exponent q)
{f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ae_measurable f μ)
(hf_nontop : ∫⁻ a, (f a)^p ∂μ ≠ ⊤) (hg_nontop : ∫⁻ a, (g a)^q ∂μ ≠ ⊤)
(hf_nonzero : ∫⁻ a, (f a)^p ∂μ ≠ 0) (hg_nonzero : ∫⁻ a, (g a)^q ∂μ ≠ 0) :
∫⁻ a, (f * g) a ∂μ ≤ (∫⁻ a, (f a)^p ∂μ)^(1/p) * (∫⁻ a, (g a)^q ∂μ)^(1/q) :=
begin
let npf := (∫⁻ (c : α), (f c) ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1/p),
let nqg := (∫⁻ (c : α), (g c) ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1/q),
calc ∫⁻ (a : α), (f * g) a ∂μ
= ∫⁻ (a : α), ((fun_mul_inv_snorm f p μ * fun_mul_inv_snorm g q μ) a)
* (npf * nqg) ∂μ :
begin
refine lintegral_congr (λ a, _),
rw [pi.mul_apply, fun_eq_fun_mul_inv_snorm_mul_snorm f hf_nonzero hf_nontop,
fun_eq_fun_mul_inv_snorm_mul_snorm g hg_nonzero hg_nontop, pi.mul_apply],
ring,
end
... ≤ npf * nqg :
begin
rw lintegral_mul_const' (npf * nqg) _ (by simp [hf_nontop, hg_nontop, hf_nonzero, hg_nonzero]),
nth_rewrite 1 ←one_mul (npf * nqg),
refine mul_le_mul _ (le_refl (npf * nqg)),
have hf1 := lintegral_rpow_fun_mul_inv_snorm_eq_one hpq.pos hf_nonzero hf_nontop,
have hg1 := lintegral_rpow_fun_mul_inv_snorm_eq_one hpq.symm.pos hg_nonzero hg_nontop,
exact lintegral_mul_le_one_of_lintegral_rpow_eq_one hpq (hf.mul_const _) hf1 hg1,
end
end
lemma ae_eq_zero_of_lintegral_rpow_eq_zero {p : ℝ} (hp0 : 0 ≤ p) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ae_measurable f μ) (hf_zero : ∫⁻ a, (f a)^p ∂μ = 0) :
f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
begin
rw lintegral_eq_zero_iff' (hf.pow_const p) at hf_zero,
refine filter.eventually.mp hf_zero (filter.eventually_of_forall (λ x, _)),
dsimp only,
rw [pi.zero_apply, ← not_imp_not],
exact λ hx, (rpow_pos_of_nonneg (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hx) hp0).ne'
end
lemma lintegral_mul_eq_zero_of_lintegral_rpow_eq_zero {p : ℝ} (hp0 : 0 ≤ p)
{f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) (hf_zero : ∫⁻ a, (f a)^p ∂μ = 0) :
∫⁻ a, (f * g) a ∂μ = 0 :=
begin
rw ←@lintegral_zero_fun α _ μ,
refine lintegral_congr_ae _,
suffices h_mul_zero : f * g =ᵐ[μ] 0 * g , by rwa zero_mul at h_mul_zero,
have hf_eq_zero : f =ᵐ[μ] 0, from ae_eq_zero_of_lintegral_rpow_eq_zero hp0 hf hf_zero,
exact hf_eq_zero.mul (ae_eq_refl g),
end
lemma lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq_of_ne_zero_of_eq_top {p q : ℝ} (hp0_lt : 0 < p) (hq0 : 0 ≤ q)
{f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf_top : ∫⁻ a, (f a)^p ∂μ = ⊤) (hg_nonzero : ∫⁻ a, (g a)^q ∂μ ≠ 0) :
∫⁻ a, (f * g) a ∂μ ≤ (∫⁻ a, (f a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) * (∫⁻ a, (g a)^q ∂μ) ^ (1/q) :=
begin
refine le_trans le_top (le_of_eq _),
have hp0_inv_lt : 0 < 1/p, by simp [hp0_lt],
rw [hf_top, ennreal.top_rpow_of_pos hp0_inv_lt],
simp [hq0, hg_nonzero],
end
/-- Hölder's inequality for functions `α → ℝ≥0∞`. The integral of the product of two functions
is bounded by the product of their `ℒp` and `ℒq` seminorms when `p` and `q` are conjugate
exponents. -/
theorem lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq (μ : measure α) {p q : ℝ} (hpq : p.is_conjugate_exponent q)
{f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) (hg : ae_measurable g μ) :
∫⁻ a, (f * g) a ∂μ ≤ (∫⁻ a, (f a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) * (∫⁻ a, (g a)^q ∂μ) ^ (1/q) :=
begin
by_cases hf_zero : ∫⁻ a, (f a) ^ p ∂μ = 0,
{ refine eq.trans_le _ (zero_le _),
exact lintegral_mul_eq_zero_of_lintegral_rpow_eq_zero hpq.nonneg hf hf_zero, },
by_cases hg_zero : ∫⁻ a, (g a) ^ q ∂μ = 0,
{ refine eq.trans_le _ (zero_le _),
rw mul_comm,
exact lintegral_mul_eq_zero_of_lintegral_rpow_eq_zero hpq.symm.nonneg hg hg_zero, },
by_cases hf_top : ∫⁻ a, (f a) ^ p ∂μ = ⊤,
{ exact lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq_of_ne_zero_of_eq_top hpq.pos hpq.symm.nonneg hf_top hg_zero, },
by_cases hg_top : ∫⁻ a, (g a) ^ q ∂μ = ⊤,
{ rw [mul_comm, mul_comm ((∫⁻ (a : α), (f a) ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p))],
exact lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq_of_ne_zero_of_eq_top hpq.symm.pos hpq.nonneg hg_top hf_zero, },
-- non-⊤ non-zero case
exact ennreal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq_of_ne_zero_of_ne_top hpq hf hf_top hg_top hf_zero hg_zero
end
lemma lintegral_rpow_add_lt_top_of_lintegral_rpow_lt_top {p : ℝ}
{f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) (hf_top : ∫⁻ a, (f a) ^ p ∂μ < ⊤)
(hg_top : ∫⁻ a, (g a) ^ p ∂μ < ⊤) (hp1 : 1 ≤ p) :
∫⁻ a, ((f + g) a) ^ p ∂μ < ⊤ :=
begin
have hp0_lt : 0 < p, from lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hp1,
have hp0 : 0 ≤ p, from le_of_lt hp0_lt,
calc ∫⁻ (a : α), (f a + g a) ^ p ∂μ
≤ ∫⁻ a, ((2:ℝ≥0∞)^(p-1) * (f a) ^ p + (2:ℝ≥0∞)^(p-1) * (g a) ^ p) ∂ μ :
begin
refine lintegral_mono (λ a, _),
dsimp only,
have h_zero_lt_half_rpow : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) < (1 / 2) ^ p,
{ rw [←ennreal.zero_rpow_of_pos hp0_lt],
exact ennreal.rpow_lt_rpow (by simp [zero_lt_one]) hp0_lt, },
have h_rw : (1 / 2) ^ p * (2:ℝ≥0∞) ^ (p - 1) = 1 / 2,
{ rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ennreal.rpow_add _ _ ennreal.two_ne_zero ennreal.coe_ne_top,
←mul_assoc, ←ennreal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ hp0, one_div,
ennreal.inv_mul_cancel ennreal.two_ne_zero ennreal.coe_ne_top, ennreal.one_rpow,
one_mul, ennreal.rpow_neg_one], },
rw ←ennreal.mul_le_mul_left (ne_of_lt h_zero_lt_half_rpow).symm _,
{ rw [mul_add, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, h_rw, ←ennreal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ hp0, mul_add],
refine ennreal.rpow_arith_mean_le_arith_mean2_rpow (1/2 : ℝ≥0∞) (1/2 : ℝ≥0∞)
(f a) (g a) _ hp1,
rw [ennreal.div_add_div_same, one_add_one_eq_two,
ennreal.div_self ennreal.two_ne_zero ennreal.coe_ne_top], },
{ rw ← lt_top_iff_ne_top,
refine ennreal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg hp0 _,
rw [one_div, ennreal.inv_ne_top],
exact ennreal.two_ne_zero, },
end
... < ⊤ :
begin
have h_two : (2 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (p - 1) ≠ ⊤,
from ennreal.rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg (by simp [hp1]) ennreal.coe_ne_top,
rw [lintegral_add_left', lintegral_const_mul'' _ (hf.pow_const p),
lintegral_const_mul' _ _ h_two, ennreal.add_lt_top],
{ exact ⟨ennreal.mul_lt_top h_two hf_top.ne, ennreal.mul_lt_top h_two hg_top.ne⟩ },
{ exact (hf.pow_const p).const_mul _ }
end
end
lemma lintegral_Lp_mul_le_Lq_mul_Lr {α} [measurable_space α] {p q r : ℝ} (hp0_lt : 0 < p)
(hpq : p < q) (hpqr : 1/p = 1/q + 1/r) (μ : measure α) {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ae_measurable f μ) (hg : ae_measurable g μ) :
(∫⁻ a, ((f * g) a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) ≤ (∫⁻ a, (f a)^q ∂μ) ^ (1/q) * (∫⁻ a, (g a)^r ∂μ) ^ (1/r) :=
begin
have hp0_ne : p ≠ 0, from (ne_of_lt hp0_lt).symm,
have hp0 : 0 ≤ p, from le_of_lt hp0_lt,
have hq0_lt : 0 < q, from lt_of_le_of_lt hp0 hpq,
have hq0_ne : q ≠ 0, from (ne_of_lt hq0_lt).symm,
have h_one_div_r : 1/r = 1/p - 1/q, by simp [hpqr],
have hr0_ne : r ≠ 0,
{ have hr_inv_pos : 0 < 1/r,
by rwa [h_one_div_r, sub_pos, one_div_lt_one_div hq0_lt hp0_lt],
rw [one_div, _root_.inv_pos] at hr_inv_pos,
exact (ne_of_lt hr_inv_pos).symm, },
let p2 := q/p,
let q2 := p2.conjugate_exponent,
have hp2q2 : p2.is_conjugate_exponent q2,
from real.is_conjugate_exponent_conjugate_exponent (by simp [lt_div_iff, hpq, hp0_lt]),
calc (∫⁻ (a : α), ((f * g) a) ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p)
= (∫⁻ (a : α), (f a)^p * (g a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) :
by simp_rw [pi.mul_apply, ennreal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ hp0]
... ≤ ((∫⁻ a, (f a)^(p * p2) ∂ μ)^(1/p2) * (∫⁻ a, (g a)^(p * q2) ∂ μ)^(1/q2)) ^ (1/p) :
begin
refine ennreal.rpow_le_rpow _ (by simp [hp0]),
simp_rw ennreal.rpow_mul,
exact ennreal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq μ hp2q2 (hf.pow_const _) (hg.pow_const _)
end
... = (∫⁻ (a : α), (f a) ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1 / q) * (∫⁻ (a : α), (g a) ^ r ∂μ) ^ (1 / r) :
begin
rw [@ennreal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ (1/p) (by simp [hp0]), ←ennreal.rpow_mul,
←ennreal.rpow_mul],
have hpp2 : p * p2 = q,
{ symmetry, rw [mul_comm, ←div_eq_iff hp0_ne], },
have hpq2 : p * q2 = r,
{ rw [← inv_inv r, ← one_div, ← one_div, h_one_div_r],
field_simp [q2, real.conjugate_exponent, p2, hp0_ne, hq0_ne] },
simp_rw [div_mul_div_comm, mul_one, mul_comm p2, mul_comm q2, hpp2, hpq2],
end
end
lemma lintegral_mul_rpow_le_lintegral_rpow_mul_lintegral_rpow {p q : ℝ}
(hpq : p.is_conjugate_exponent q) {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ae_measurable f μ) (hg : ae_measurable g μ) (hf_top : ∫⁻ a, (f a) ^ p ∂μ ≠ ⊤) :
∫⁻ a, (f a) * (g a) ^ (p - 1) ∂μ ≤ (∫⁻ a, (f a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) * (∫⁻ a, (g a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/q) :=
begin
refine le_trans (ennreal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq μ hpq hf (hg.pow_const _)) _,
by_cases hf_zero_rpow : (∫⁻ (a : α), (f a) ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) = 0,
{ rw [hf_zero_rpow, zero_mul],
exact zero_le _, },
have hf_top_rpow : (∫⁻ (a : α), (f a) ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) ≠ ⊤,
{ by_contra h,
refine hf_top _,
have hp_not_neg : ¬ p < 0, by simp [hpq.nonneg],
simpa [hpq.pos, hp_not_neg] using h, },
refine (ennreal.mul_le_mul_left hf_zero_rpow hf_top_rpow).mpr (le_of_eq _),
congr,
ext1 a,
rw [←ennreal.rpow_mul, hpq.sub_one_mul_conj],
end
lemma lintegral_rpow_add_le_add_snorm_mul_lintegral_rpow_add {p q : ℝ}
(hpq : p.is_conjugate_exponent q) {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ae_measurable f μ)
(hf_top : ∫⁻ a, (f a) ^ p ∂μ ≠ ⊤) (hg : ae_measurable g μ) (hg_top : ∫⁻ a, (g a) ^ p ∂μ ≠ ⊤) :
∫⁻ a, ((f + g) a)^p ∂ μ
≤ ((∫⁻ a, (f a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) + (∫⁻ a, (g a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p))
* (∫⁻ a, (f a + g a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/q) :=
begin
calc ∫⁻ a, ((f+g) a) ^ p ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, ((f + g) a) * ((f + g) a) ^ (p - 1) ∂μ :
begin
refine lintegral_mono (λ a, _),
dsimp only,
by_cases h_zero : (f + g) a = 0,
{ rw [h_zero, ennreal.zero_rpow_of_pos hpq.pos],
exact zero_le _, },
by_cases h_top : (f + g) a = ⊤,
{ rw [h_top, ennreal.top_rpow_of_pos hpq.sub_one_pos, ennreal.top_mul_top],
exact le_top, },
refine le_of_eq _,
nth_rewrite 1 ←ennreal.rpow_one ((f + g) a),
rw [←ennreal.rpow_add _ _ h_zero h_top, add_sub_cancel'_right],
end
... = ∫⁻ (a : α), f a * (f + g) a ^ (p - 1) ∂μ + ∫⁻ (a : α), g a * (f + g) a ^ (p - 1) ∂μ :
begin
have h_add_m : ae_measurable (λ (a : α), ((f + g) a) ^ (p-1)) μ,
from (hf.add hg).pow_const _,
have h_add_apply : ∫⁻ (a : α), (f + g) a * (f + g) a ^ (p - 1) ∂μ
= ∫⁻ (a : α), (f a + g a) * (f + g) a ^ (p - 1) ∂μ,
from rfl,
simp_rw [h_add_apply, add_mul],
rw lintegral_add_left' (hf.mul h_add_m),
end
... ≤ ((∫⁻ a, (f a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) + (∫⁻ a, (g a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p))
* (∫⁻ a, (f a + g a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/q) :
begin
rw add_mul,
exact add_le_add
(lintegral_mul_rpow_le_lintegral_rpow_mul_lintegral_rpow hpq hf (hf.add hg) hf_top)
(lintegral_mul_rpow_le_lintegral_rpow_mul_lintegral_rpow hpq hg (hf.add hg) hg_top),
end
end
private lemma lintegral_Lp_add_le_aux {p q : ℝ}
(hpq : p.is_conjugate_exponent q) {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ae_measurable f μ)
(hf_top : ∫⁻ a, (f a) ^ p ∂μ ≠ ⊤) (hg : ae_measurable g μ) (hg_top : ∫⁻ a, (g a) ^ p ∂μ ≠ ⊤)
(h_add_zero : ∫⁻ a, ((f+g) a) ^ p ∂ μ ≠ 0) (h_add_top : ∫⁻ a, ((f+g) a) ^ p ∂ μ ≠ ⊤) :
(∫⁻ a, ((f + g) a)^p ∂ μ) ^ (1/p) ≤ (∫⁻ a, (f a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) + (∫⁻ a, (g a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) :=
begin
have hp_not_nonpos : ¬ p ≤ 0, by simp [hpq.pos],
have htop_rpow : (∫⁻ a, ((f+g) a) ^ p ∂μ)^(1/p) ≠ ⊤,
{ by_contra h,
exact h_add_top (@ennreal.rpow_eq_top_of_nonneg _ (1/p) (by simp [hpq.nonneg]) h), },
have h0_rpow : (∫⁻ a, ((f+g) a) ^ p ∂ μ) ^ (1/p) ≠ 0,
by simp [h_add_zero, h_add_top, hpq.nonneg, hp_not_nonpos, -pi.add_apply],
suffices h : 1 ≤ (∫⁻ (a : α), ((f+g) a)^p ∂μ) ^ -(1/p)
* ((∫⁻ (a : α), (f a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) + (∫⁻ (a : α), (g a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p)),
by rwa [←mul_le_mul_left h0_rpow htop_rpow, ←mul_assoc, ←rpow_add _ _ h_add_zero h_add_top,
←sub_eq_add_neg, _root_.sub_self, rpow_zero, one_mul, mul_one] at h,
have h : ∫⁻ (a : α), ((f+g) a)^p ∂μ
≤ ((∫⁻ (a : α), (f a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) + (∫⁻ (a : α), (g a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p))
* (∫⁻ (a : α), ((f+g) a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/q),
from lintegral_rpow_add_le_add_snorm_mul_lintegral_rpow_add hpq hf hf_top hg hg_top,
have h_one_div_q : 1/q = 1 - 1/p, by { nth_rewrite 1 ←hpq.inv_add_inv_conj, ring, },
simp_rw [h_one_div_q, sub_eq_add_neg 1 (1/p), ennreal.rpow_add _ _ h_add_zero h_add_top,
rpow_one] at h,
nth_rewrite 1 mul_comm at h,
nth_rewrite 0 ←one_mul (∫⁻ (a : α), ((f+g) a) ^ p ∂μ) at h,
rwa [←mul_assoc, ennreal.mul_le_mul_right h_add_zero h_add_top, mul_comm] at h,
end
/-- Minkowski's inequality for functions `α → ℝ≥0∞`: the `ℒp` seminorm of the sum of two
functions is bounded by the sum of their `ℒp` seminorms. -/
theorem lintegral_Lp_add_le {p : ℝ} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ae_measurable f μ) (hg : ae_measurable g μ) (hp1 : 1 ≤ p) :
(∫⁻ a, ((f + g) a)^p ∂ μ) ^ (1/p) ≤ (∫⁻ a, (f a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) + (∫⁻ a, (g a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) :=
begin
have hp_pos : 0 < p, from lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hp1,
by_cases hf_top : ∫⁻ a, (f a) ^ p ∂μ = ⊤,
{ simp [hf_top, hp_pos], },
by_cases hg_top : ∫⁻ a, (g a) ^ p ∂μ = ⊤,
{ simp [hg_top, hp_pos], },
by_cases h1 : p = 1,
{ refine le_of_eq _,
simp_rw [h1, one_div_one, ennreal.rpow_one],
exact lintegral_add_left' hf _, },
have hp1_lt : 1 < p, by { refine lt_of_le_of_ne hp1 _, symmetry, exact h1, },
have hpq := real.is_conjugate_exponent_conjugate_exponent hp1_lt,
by_cases h0 : ∫⁻ a, ((f+g) a) ^ p ∂ μ = 0,
{ rw [h0, @ennreal.zero_rpow_of_pos (1/p) (by simp [lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hp1])],
exact zero_le _, },
have htop : ∫⁻ a, ((f+g) a) ^ p ∂ μ ≠ ⊤,
{ rw ← ne.def at hf_top hg_top,
rw ← lt_top_iff_ne_top at hf_top hg_top ⊢,
exact lintegral_rpow_add_lt_top_of_lintegral_rpow_lt_top hf hf_top hg_top hp1, },
exact lintegral_Lp_add_le_aux hpq hf hf_top hg hg_top h0 htop,
end
end ennreal
/-- Hölder's inequality for functions `α → ℝ≥0`. The integral of the product of two functions
is bounded by the product of their `ℒp` and `ℒq` seminorms when `p` and `q` are conjugate
exponents. -/
theorem nnreal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq {p q : ℝ} (hpq : p.is_conjugate_exponent q)
{f g : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) (hg : ae_measurable g μ) :
∫⁻ a, (f * g) a ∂μ ≤ (∫⁻ a, (f a)^p ∂μ)^(1/p) * (∫⁻ a, (g a)^q ∂μ)^(1/q) :=
begin
simp_rw [pi.mul_apply, ennreal.coe_mul],
exact ennreal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq μ hpq hf.coe_nnreal_ennreal hg.coe_nnreal_ennreal,
end
end lintegral
|
8b531b8cd7112ac0d875886e4be94b2e4ec52525 | 097294e9b80f0d9893ac160b9c7219aa135b51b9 | /instructor/propositional_logic/hw8.lean | a46b72f59106e3967d472e7538cce2865364027e | [] | no_license | AbigailCastro17/CS2102-Discrete-Math | cf296251be9418ce90206f5e66bde9163e21abf9 | d741e4d2d6a9b2e0c8380e51706218b8f608cee4 | refs/heads/main | 1,682,891,087,358 | 1,621,401,341,000 | 1,621,401,341,000 | 368,749,959 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 242 | lean | /-
In this homework you first reconceptualize
our implementation of propositional logic as
a language of Boolean arithmetic. Then you
apply what you've learned to extend it with
relational expressions that evaluate to truth
values.
-/
|
3e8e21ff18baeed2eb50c8bafdd05294d14e29eb | 80cc5bf14c8ea85ff340d1d747a127dcadeb966f | /src/data/bool.lean | 632b51c7276039f9616ee1eebfc70e49aac967cc | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | lacker/mathlib | f2439c743c4f8eb413ec589430c82d0f73b2d539 | ddf7563ac69d42cfa4a1bfe41db1fed521bd795f | refs/heads/master | 1,671,948,326,773 | 1,601,479,268,000 | 1,601,479,268,000 | 298,686,743 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,601,070,794,000 | 1,601,070,794,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,482 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad
-/
/-!
# booleans
This file proves various trivial lemmas about booleans and their
relation to decidable propositions.
## Notations
This file introduces the notation `!b` for `bnot b`, the boolean "not".
## Tags
bool, boolean, De Morgan
-/
prefix `!`:90 := bnot
namespace bool
@[simp] theorem coe_sort_tt : coe_sort.{1 1} tt = true := eq_true_intro rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_sort_ff : coe_sort.{1 1} ff = false := eq_false_intro ff_ne_tt
@[simp] theorem to_bool_true {h} : @to_bool true h = tt :=
show _ = to_bool true, by congr
@[simp] theorem to_bool_false {h} : @to_bool false h = ff :=
show _ = to_bool false, by congr
@[simp] theorem to_bool_coe (b:bool) {h} : @to_bool b h = b :=
(show _ = to_bool b, by congr).trans (by cases b; refl)
theorem coe_to_bool (p : Prop) [decidable p] : to_bool p ↔ p := to_bool_iff _
@[simp] lemma of_to_bool_iff {p : Prop} [decidable p] : to_bool p ↔ p :=
⟨of_to_bool_true, _root_.to_bool_true⟩
@[simp] lemma tt_eq_to_bool_iff {p : Prop} [decidable p] : tt = to_bool p ↔ p :=
eq_comm.trans of_to_bool_iff
@[simp] lemma ff_eq_to_bool_iff {p : Prop} [decidable p] : ff = to_bool p ↔ ¬ p :=
eq_comm.trans (to_bool_ff_iff _)
@[simp] theorem to_bool_not (p : Prop) [decidable p] : to_bool (¬ p) = bnot (to_bool p) :=
by by_cases p; simp *
@[simp] theorem to_bool_and (p q : Prop) [decidable p] [decidable q] :
to_bool (p ∧ q) = p && q :=
by by_cases p; by_cases q; simp *
@[simp] theorem to_bool_or (p q : Prop) [decidable p] [decidable q] :
to_bool (p ∨ q) = p || q :=
by by_cases p; by_cases q; simp *
@[simp] theorem to_bool_eq {p q : Prop} [decidable p] [decidable q] :
to_bool p = to_bool q ↔ (p ↔ q) :=
⟨λ h, (coe_to_bool p).symm.trans $ by simp [h], to_bool_congr⟩
lemma not_ff : ¬ ff := by simp
@[simp] theorem default_bool : default bool = ff := rfl
theorem dichotomy (b : bool) : b = ff ∨ b = tt :=
by cases b; simp
@[simp] theorem forall_bool {p : bool → Prop} : (∀ b, p b) ↔ p ff ∧ p tt :=
⟨λ h, by simp [h], λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ b, by cases b; assumption⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_bool {p : bool → Prop} : (∃ b, p b) ↔ p ff ∨ p tt :=
⟨λ ⟨b, h⟩, by cases b; [exact or.inl h, exact or.inr h],
λ h, by cases h; exact ⟨_, h⟩⟩
/-- If `p b` is decidable for all `b : bool`, then `∀ b, p b` is decidable -/
instance decidable_forall_bool {p : bool → Prop} [∀ b, decidable (p b)] : decidable (∀ b, p b) :=
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff and.decidable forall_bool.symm
/-- If `p b` is decidable for all `b : bool`, then `∃ b, p b` is decidable -/
instance decidable_exists_bool {p : bool → Prop} [∀ b, decidable (p b)] : decidable (∃ b, p b) :=
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff or.decidable exists_bool.symm
@[simp] theorem cond_ff {α} (t e : α) : cond ff t e = e := rfl
@[simp] theorem cond_tt {α} (t e : α) : cond tt t e = t := rfl
@[simp] theorem cond_to_bool {α} (p : Prop) [decidable p] (t e : α) :
cond (to_bool p) t e = if p then t else e :=
by by_cases p; simp *
theorem coe_bool_iff : ∀ {a b : bool}, (a ↔ b) ↔ a = b := dec_trivial
theorem eq_tt_of_ne_ff : ∀ {a : bool}, a ≠ ff → a = tt := dec_trivial
theorem eq_ff_of_ne_tt : ∀ {a : bool}, a ≠ tt → a = ff := dec_trivial
theorem bor_comm : ∀ a b, a || b = b || a := dec_trivial
@[simp] theorem bor_assoc : ∀ a b c, (a || b) || c = a || (b || c) := dec_trivial
theorem bor_left_comm : ∀ a b c, a || (b || c) = b || (a || c) := dec_trivial
theorem bor_inl {a b : bool} (H : a) : a || b :=
by simp [H]
theorem bor_inr {a b : bool} (H : b) : a || b :=
by simp [H]
theorem band_comm : ∀ a b, a && b = b && a := dec_trivial
@[simp] theorem band_assoc : ∀ a b c, (a && b) && c = a && (b && c) := dec_trivial
theorem band_left_comm : ∀ a b c, a && (b && c) = b && (a && c) := dec_trivial
theorem band_elim_left : ∀ {a b : bool}, a && b → a := dec_trivial
theorem band_intro : ∀ {a b : bool}, a → b → a && b := dec_trivial
theorem band_elim_right : ∀ {a b : bool}, a && b → b := dec_trivial
@[simp] theorem bnot_false : bnot ff = tt := rfl
@[simp] theorem bnot_true : bnot tt = ff := rfl
theorem eq_tt_of_bnot_eq_ff : ∀ {a : bool}, bnot a = ff → a = tt := dec_trivial
theorem eq_ff_of_bnot_eq_tt : ∀ {a : bool}, bnot a = tt → a = ff := dec_trivial
theorem bxor_comm : ∀ a b, bxor a b = bxor b a := dec_trivial
@[simp] theorem bxor_assoc : ∀ a b c, bxor (bxor a b) c = bxor a (bxor b c) := dec_trivial
theorem bxor_left_comm : ∀ a b c, bxor a (bxor b c) = bxor b (bxor a c) := dec_trivial
@[simp] theorem bxor_bnot_left : ∀ a, bxor (!a) a = tt := dec_trivial
@[simp] theorem bxor_bnot_right : ∀ a, bxor a (!a) = tt := dec_trivial
@[simp] theorem bxor_bnot_bnot : ∀ a b, bxor (!a) (!b) = bxor a b := dec_trivial
@[simp] theorem bxor_ff_left : ∀ a, bxor ff a = a := dec_trivial
@[simp] theorem bxor_ff_right : ∀ a, bxor a ff = a := dec_trivial
lemma bxor_iff_ne : ∀ {x y : bool}, bxor x y = tt ↔ x ≠ y := dec_trivial
/-! ### De Morgan's laws for booleans-/
@[simp] lemma bnot_band : ∀ (a b : bool), !(a && b) = !a || !b := dec_trivial
@[simp] lemma bnot_bor : ∀ (a b : bool), !(a || b) = !a && !b := dec_trivial
lemma bnot_inj : ∀ {a b : bool}, !a = !b → a = b := dec_trivial
end bool
instance : decidable_linear_order bool :=
begin
constructor,
show bool → bool → Prop,
{ exact λ a b, a = ff ∨ b = tt },
all_goals {apply_instance <|> exact dec_trivial}
end
namespace bool
/-- convert a `bool` to a `ℕ`, `false -> 0`, `true -> 1` -/
def to_nat (b : bool) : ℕ :=
cond b 1 0
/-- convert a `ℕ` to a `bool`, `0 -> false`, everything else -> `true` -/
def of_nat (n : ℕ) : bool :=
to_bool (n ≠ 0)
lemma of_nat_le_of_nat {n m : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : of_nat n ≤ of_nat m :=
begin
simp [of_nat];
cases nat.decidable_eq n 0;
cases nat.decidable_eq m 0;
simp only [to_bool],
{ subst m, have h := le_antisymm h (nat.zero_le _),
contradiction },
{ left, refl }
end
lemma to_nat_le_to_nat {b₀ b₁ : bool} (h : b₀ ≤ b₁) : to_nat b₀ ≤ to_nat b₁ :=
by cases h; subst h; [cases b₁, cases b₀]; simp [to_nat,nat.zero_le]
lemma of_nat_to_nat (b : bool) : of_nat (to_nat b) = b :=
by cases b; simp only [of_nat,to_nat]; exact dec_trivial
end bool
|
daed9d839f07a3318717ad12fbaacbd79ab2b781 | ae1e94c332e17c7dc7051ce976d5a9eebe7ab8a5 | /tests/lean/zipper.lean | 5e1f081aa88f3b56fb27a77e792c56af1d66137b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dupuisf/lean4 | d082d13b01243e1de29ae680eefb476961221eef | 6a39c65bd28eb0e28c3870188f348c8914502718 | refs/heads/master | 1,676,948,755,391 | 1,610,665,114,000 | 1,610,665,114,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,405 | lean | structure ListZipper (α : Type) :=
(xs : List α) (bs : List α)
-- set_option trace.compiler.ir.rc true
variables {α : Type}
namespace ListZipper
def goForward : ListZipper α → ListZipper α
| ⟨[], bs⟩ => ⟨[], bs⟩
| ⟨x::xs, bs⟩ => ⟨xs, x::bs⟩
def goBackward : ListZipper α → ListZipper α
| ⟨xs, []⟩ => ⟨xs, []⟩
| ⟨xs, b::bs⟩ => ⟨b::xs, bs⟩
def insert : ListZipper α → α → ListZipper α
| ⟨xs, bs⟩, x => ⟨xs, x::bs⟩
def erase : ListZipper α → ListZipper α
| ⟨[], bs⟩ => ⟨[], bs⟩
| ⟨x::xs, bs⟩ => ⟨xs, bs⟩
def curr [Inhabited α] : ListZipper α → α
| ⟨[], bs⟩ => arbitrary
| ⟨x::xs, bs⟩ => x
def currOpt : ListZipper α → Option α
| ⟨[], bs⟩ => none
| ⟨x::xs, bs⟩ => some x
def toList : ListZipper α → List α
| ⟨xs, bs⟩ => bs.reverse ++ xs
def atEnd (z : ListZipper α) : Bool :=
z.xs.isEmpty
end ListZipper
def List.toListZipper (xs : List α) : ListZipper α :=
⟨xs, []⟩
partial def testAux : ListZipper Nat → ListZipper Nat
| z =>
if z.atEnd then
z
else if z.curr % 2 == 0 then
testAux (z.goForward.insert 0)
else if z.curr > 20 then
testAux z.erase
else
testAux z.goForward -- testAux z.goForward
def test (xs : List Nat) : List Nat :=
(testAux xs.toListZipper).toList
#eval (IO.println (test [10, 11, 13, 20, 22, 40, 41, 11]) : IO Unit)
|
20074c1db556392e5333af5402c3fea1cde7bbd8 | 9dc8cecdf3c4634764a18254e94d43da07142918 | /src/data/nat/modeq.lean | 53ee3cded32c970d9eb12dae9367d1f6c152ce4d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcommelin/mathlib | d8456447c36c176e14d96d9e76f39841f69d2d9b | ee8279351a2e434c2852345c51b728d22af5a156 | refs/heads/master | 1,664,782,136,488 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 132,563,656 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,663,599,929,000 | 1,525,760,539,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 20,874 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.int.gcd
import data.list.rotate
import tactic.abel
/-!
# Congruences modulo a natural number
This file defines the equivalence relation `a ≡ b [MOD n]` on the natural numbers,
and proves basic properties about it such as the Chinese Remainder Theorem
`modeq_and_modeq_iff_modeq_mul`.
## Notations
`a ≡ b [MOD n]` is notation for `nat.modeq n a b`, which is defined to mean `a % n = b % n`.
## Tags
modeq, congruence, mod, MOD, modulo
-/
namespace nat
/-- Modular equality. `n.modeq a b`, or `a ≡ b [MOD n]`, means that `a - b` is a multiple of `n`. -/
@[derive decidable]
def modeq (n a b : ℕ) := a % n = b % n
notation a ` ≡ `:50 b ` [MOD `:50 n `]`:0 := modeq n a b
variables {m n a b c d : ℕ}
namespace modeq
@[refl] protected theorem refl (a : ℕ) : a ≡ a [MOD n] := @rfl _ _
protected theorem rfl : a ≡ a [MOD n] := modeq.refl _
instance : is_refl _ (modeq n) := ⟨modeq.refl⟩
@[symm] protected theorem symm : a ≡ b [MOD n] → b ≡ a [MOD n] := eq.symm
@[trans] protected theorem trans : a ≡ b [MOD n] → b ≡ c [MOD n] → a ≡ c [MOD n] := eq.trans
protected theorem comm : a ≡ b [MOD n] ↔ b ≡ a [MOD n] := ⟨modeq.symm, modeq.symm⟩
end modeq
theorem modeq_zero_iff_dvd : a ≡ 0 [MOD n] ↔ n ∣ a :=
by rw [modeq, zero_mod, dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero]
lemma _root_.has_dvd.dvd.modeq_zero_nat (h : n ∣ a) : a ≡ 0 [MOD n] := modeq_zero_iff_dvd.2 h
lemma _root_.has_dvd.dvd.zero_modeq_nat (h : n ∣ a) : 0 ≡ a [MOD n] := h.modeq_zero_nat.symm
theorem modeq_iff_dvd : a ≡ b [MOD n] ↔ (n:ℤ) ∣ b - a :=
by rw [modeq, eq_comm, ← int.coe_nat_inj', int.coe_nat_mod, int.coe_nat_mod,
int.mod_eq_mod_iff_mod_sub_eq_zero, int.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero]
protected theorem modeq.dvd : a ≡ b [MOD n] → (n:ℤ) ∣ b - a := modeq_iff_dvd.1
theorem modeq_of_dvd : (n:ℤ) ∣ b - a → a ≡ b [MOD n] := modeq_iff_dvd.2
/-- A variant of `modeq_iff_dvd` with `nat` divisibility -/
theorem modeq_iff_dvd' (h : a ≤ b) : a ≡ b [MOD n] ↔ n ∣ b - a :=
by rw [modeq_iff_dvd, ←int.coe_nat_dvd, int.coe_nat_sub h]
theorem mod_modeq (a n) : a % n ≡ a [MOD n] := mod_mod _ _
namespace modeq
protected theorem modeq_of_dvd (d : m ∣ n) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : a ≡ b [MOD m] :=
modeq_of_dvd ((int.coe_nat_dvd.2 d).trans h.dvd)
protected theorem mul_left' (c : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : c * a ≡ c * b [MOD (c * n)] :=
by unfold modeq at *; rw [mul_mod_mul_left, mul_mod_mul_left, h]
protected theorem mul_left (c : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : c * a ≡ c * b [MOD n] :=
(h.mul_left' _ ).modeq_of_dvd (dvd_mul_left _ _)
protected theorem mul_right' (c : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : a * c ≡ b * c [MOD (n * c)] :=
by rw [mul_comm a, mul_comm b, mul_comm n]; exact h.mul_left' c
protected theorem mul_right (c : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : a * c ≡ b * c [MOD n] :=
by rw [mul_comm a, mul_comm b]; exact h.mul_left c
protected theorem mul (h₁ : a ≡ b [MOD n]) (h₂ : c ≡ d [MOD n]) : a * c ≡ b * d [MOD n] :=
(h₂.mul_left _ ).trans (h₁.mul_right _)
protected theorem pow (m : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : a ^ m ≡ b ^ m [MOD n] :=
begin
induction m with d hd, {refl},
rw [pow_succ, pow_succ],
exact h.mul hd,
end
protected theorem add (h₁ : a ≡ b [MOD n]) (h₂ : c ≡ d [MOD n]) : a + c ≡ b + d [MOD n] :=
begin
rw [modeq_iff_dvd, int.coe_nat_add, int.coe_nat_add, add_sub_add_comm],
exact dvd_add h₁.dvd h₂.dvd,
end
protected theorem add_left (c : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : c + a ≡ c + b [MOD n] :=
modeq.rfl.add h
protected theorem add_right (c : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : a + c ≡ b + c [MOD n] :=
h.add modeq.rfl
protected theorem add_left_cancel (h₁ : a ≡ b [MOD n]) (h₂ : a + c ≡ b + d [MOD n]) :
c ≡ d [MOD n] :=
begin
simp only [modeq_iff_dvd, int.coe_nat_add] at *,
rw add_sub_add_comm at h₂,
convert _root_.dvd_sub h₂ h₁ using 1,
rw add_sub_cancel',
end
protected theorem add_left_cancel' (c : ℕ) (h : c + a ≡ c + b [MOD n]) : a ≡ b [MOD n] :=
modeq.rfl.add_left_cancel h
protected theorem add_right_cancel (h₁ : c ≡ d [MOD n]) (h₂ : a + c ≡ b + d [MOD n]) :
a ≡ b [MOD n] :=
by { rw [add_comm a, add_comm b] at h₂, exact h₁.add_left_cancel h₂ }
protected theorem add_right_cancel' (c : ℕ) (h : a + c ≡ b + c [MOD n]) : a ≡ b [MOD n] :=
modeq.rfl.add_right_cancel h
protected theorem mul_left_cancel' {a b c m : ℕ} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
c * a ≡ c * b [MOD c * m] → a ≡ b [MOD m] :=
by simp [modeq_iff_dvd, ←mul_sub, mul_dvd_mul_iff_left (by simp [hc] : (c : ℤ) ≠ 0)]
protected theorem mul_left_cancel_iff' {a b c m : ℕ} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
c * a ≡ c * b [MOD c * m] ↔ a ≡ b [MOD m] :=
⟨modeq.mul_left_cancel' hc, modeq.mul_left' _⟩
protected theorem mul_right_cancel' {a b c m : ℕ} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
a * c ≡ b * c [MOD m * c] → a ≡ b [MOD m] :=
by simp [modeq_iff_dvd, ←sub_mul, mul_dvd_mul_iff_right (by simp [hc] : (c : ℤ) ≠ 0)]
protected theorem mul_right_cancel_iff' {a b c m : ℕ} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
a * c ≡ b * c [MOD m * c] ↔ a ≡ b [MOD m] :=
⟨modeq.mul_right_cancel' hc, modeq.mul_right' _⟩
theorem of_modeq_mul_left (m : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD m * n]) : a ≡ b [MOD n] :=
by { rw [modeq_iff_dvd] at *, exact (dvd_mul_left (n : ℤ) (m : ℤ)).trans h }
theorem of_modeq_mul_right (m : ℕ) : a ≡ b [MOD n * m] → a ≡ b [MOD n] :=
mul_comm m n ▸ of_modeq_mul_left _
end modeq
theorem modeq_one : a ≡ b [MOD 1] := modeq_of_dvd (one_dvd _)
lemma modeq_sub (h : b ≤ a) : a ≡ b [MOD a - b] :=
(modeq_of_dvd $ by rw [int.coe_nat_sub h]).symm
@[simp] lemma modeq_zero_iff {a b : ℕ} : a ≡ b [MOD 0] ↔ a = b :=
by rw [nat.modeq, nat.mod_zero, nat.mod_zero]
@[simp] lemma add_modeq_left {a n : ℕ} : n + a ≡ a [MOD n] :=
by rw [nat.modeq, nat.add_mod_left]
@[simp] lemma add_modeq_right {a n : ℕ} : a + n ≡ a [MOD n] :=
by rw [nat.modeq, nat.add_mod_right]
namespace modeq
lemma le_of_lt_add (h1 : a ≡ b [MOD m]) (h2 : a < b + m) : a ≤ b :=
(le_total a b).elim id (λ h3, nat.le_of_sub_eq_zero
(eq_zero_of_dvd_of_lt ((modeq_iff_dvd' h3).mp h1.symm) ((tsub_lt_iff_left h3).mpr h2)))
lemma add_le_of_lt (h1 : a ≡ b [MOD m]) (h2 : a < b) : a + m ≤ b :=
le_of_lt_add (add_modeq_right.trans h1) (add_lt_add_right h2 m)
lemma dvd_iff_of_modeq_of_dvd {a b d m : ℕ} (h : a ≡ b [MOD m]) (hdm : d ∣ m) :
d ∣ a ↔ d ∣ b :=
begin
simp only [←modeq_zero_iff_dvd],
replace h := h.modeq_of_dvd hdm,
exact ⟨h.symm.trans, h.trans⟩,
end
lemma gcd_eq_of_modeq {a b m : ℕ} (h : a ≡ b [MOD m]) : gcd a m = gcd b m :=
begin
have h1 := gcd_dvd_right a m,
have h2 := gcd_dvd_right b m,
exact dvd_antisymm
(dvd_gcd ((dvd_iff_of_modeq_of_dvd h h1).mp (gcd_dvd_left a m)) h1)
(dvd_gcd ((dvd_iff_of_modeq_of_dvd h h2).mpr (gcd_dvd_left b m)) h2),
end
lemma eq_of_modeq_of_abs_lt {a b m : ℕ} (h : a ≡ b [MOD m]) (h2 : | (b:ℤ) - a | < m) : a = b :=
begin
apply int.coe_nat_inj,
rw [eq_comm, ←sub_eq_zero],
exact int.eq_zero_of_abs_lt_dvd (modeq_iff_dvd.mp h) h2,
end
/-- To cancel a common factor `c` from a `modeq` we must divide the modulus `m` by `gcd m c` -/
lemma modeq_cancel_left_div_gcd {a b c m : ℕ} (hm : 0 < m) (h : c * a ≡ c * b [MOD m]) :
a ≡ b [MOD m / gcd m c] :=
begin
let d := gcd m c,
have hmd := gcd_dvd_left m c,
have hcd := gcd_dvd_right m c,
rw modeq_iff_dvd,
refine int.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right_of_gcd_one _ _,
show (m/d : ℤ) ∣ (c/d) * (b - a),
{ rw [mul_comm, ←int.mul_div_assoc (b - a) (int.coe_nat_dvd.mpr hcd), mul_comm],
apply int.div_dvd_div (int.coe_nat_dvd.mpr hmd),
rw mul_sub,
exact modeq_iff_dvd.mp h },
show int.gcd (m/d) (c/d) = 1,
{ simp only [←int.coe_nat_div, int.coe_nat_gcd (m / d) (c / d), gcd_div hmd hcd,
nat.div_self (gcd_pos_of_pos_left c hm)] },
end
lemma modeq_cancel_right_div_gcd {a b c m : ℕ} (hm : 0 < m) (h : a * c ≡ b * c [MOD m]) :
a ≡ b [MOD m / gcd m c] :=
by { apply modeq_cancel_left_div_gcd hm, simpa [mul_comm] using h }
lemma modeq_cancel_left_div_gcd' {a b c d m : ℕ} (hm : 0 < m) (hcd : c ≡ d [MOD m])
(h : c * a ≡ d * b [MOD m]) :
a ≡ b [MOD m / gcd m c] :=
modeq_cancel_left_div_gcd hm (h.trans (modeq.mul_right b hcd).symm)
lemma modeq_cancel_right_div_gcd' {a b c d m : ℕ} (hm : 0 < m) (hcd : c ≡ d [MOD m])
(h : a * c ≡ b * d [MOD m]) :
a ≡ b [MOD m / gcd m c] :=
by { apply modeq_cancel_left_div_gcd' hm hcd, simpa [mul_comm] using h }
/-- A common factor that's coprime with the modulus can be cancelled from a `modeq` -/
lemma modeq_cancel_left_of_coprime {a b c m : ℕ} (hmc : gcd m c = 1) (h : c * a ≡ c * b [MOD m]) :
a ≡ b [MOD m] :=
begin
rcases m.eq_zero_or_pos with rfl | hm,
{ simp only [gcd_zero_left] at hmc,
simp only [gcd_zero_left, hmc, one_mul, modeq_zero_iff] at h,
subst h },
simpa [hmc] using modeq_cancel_left_div_gcd hm h
end
/-- A common factor that's coprime with the modulus can be cancelled from a `modeq` -/
lemma modeq_cancel_right_of_coprime {a b c m : ℕ} (hmc : gcd m c = 1) (h : a * c ≡ b * c [MOD m]) :
a ≡ b [MOD m] :=
by { apply modeq_cancel_left_of_coprime hmc, simpa [mul_comm] using h }
end modeq
local attribute [semireducible] int.nonneg
/-- The natural number less than `lcm n m` congruent to `a` mod `n` and `b` mod `m` -/
def chinese_remainder' (h : a ≡ b [MOD gcd n m]) : {k // k ≡ a [MOD n] ∧ k ≡ b [MOD m]} :=
if hn : n = 0 then ⟨a, begin rw [hn, gcd_zero_left] at h, split, refl, exact h end⟩ else
if hm : m = 0 then ⟨b, begin rw [hm, gcd_zero_right] at h, split, exact h.symm, refl end⟩ else
⟨let (c, d) := xgcd n m in int.to_nat (((n * c * b + m * d * a) / gcd n m) % lcm n m), begin
rw xgcd_val,
dsimp [chinese_remainder'._match_1],
rw [modeq_iff_dvd, modeq_iff_dvd,
int.to_nat_of_nonneg (int.mod_nonneg _ (int.coe_nat_ne_zero.2 (lcm_ne_zero hn hm)))],
have hnonzero : (gcd n m : ℤ) ≠ 0 := begin
norm_cast,
rw [nat.gcd_eq_zero_iff, not_and],
exact λ _, hm,
end,
have hcoedvd : ∀ t, (gcd n m : ℤ) ∣ t * (b - a) := λ t, h.dvd.mul_left _,
have := gcd_eq_gcd_ab n m,
split; rw [int.mod_def, ← sub_add]; refine dvd_add _ (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left _ _); try {norm_cast},
{ rw ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add' at this,
rw [← this, sub_mul, ← add_sub_assoc, add_comm, add_sub_assoc, ← mul_sub,
int.add_div_of_dvd_left, int.mul_div_cancel_left _ hnonzero,
int.mul_div_assoc _ h.dvd, ← sub_sub, sub_self, zero_sub, dvd_neg, mul_assoc],
exact dvd_mul_right _ _,
norm_cast, exact dvd_mul_right _ _, },
{ exact dvd_lcm_left n m, },
{ rw ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add at this,
rw [← this, sub_mul, sub_add, ← mul_sub, int.sub_div_of_dvd, int.mul_div_cancel_left _ hnonzero,
int.mul_div_assoc _ h.dvd, ← sub_add, sub_self, zero_add, mul_assoc],
exact dvd_mul_right _ _,
exact hcoedvd _ },
{ exact dvd_lcm_right n m, },
end⟩
/-- The natural number less than `n*m` congruent to `a` mod `n` and `b` mod `m` -/
def chinese_remainder (co : coprime n m) (a b : ℕ) : {k // k ≡ a [MOD n] ∧ k ≡ b [MOD m]} :=
chinese_remainder' (by convert modeq_one)
lemma chinese_remainder'_lt_lcm (h : a ≡ b [MOD gcd n m]) (hn : n ≠ 0) (hm : m ≠ 0) :
↑(chinese_remainder' h) < lcm n m :=
begin
dsimp only [chinese_remainder'],
rw [dif_neg hn, dif_neg hm, subtype.coe_mk, xgcd_val, ←int.to_nat_coe_nat (lcm n m)],
have lcm_pos := int.coe_nat_pos.mpr (nat.pos_of_ne_zero (lcm_ne_zero hn hm)),
exact (int.to_nat_lt_to_nat lcm_pos).mpr (int.mod_lt_of_pos _ lcm_pos),
end
lemma chinese_remainder_lt_mul (co : coprime n m) (a b : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) (hm : m ≠ 0) :
↑(chinese_remainder co a b) < n * m :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (chinese_remainder'_lt_lcm _ hn hm) (le_of_eq co.lcm_eq_mul)
lemma modeq_and_modeq_iff_modeq_mul {a b m n : ℕ} (hmn : coprime m n) :
a ≡ b [MOD m] ∧ a ≡ b [MOD n] ↔ (a ≡ b [MOD m * n]) :=
⟨λ h, begin
rw [nat.modeq_iff_dvd, nat.modeq_iff_dvd, ← int.dvd_nat_abs,
int.coe_nat_dvd, ← int.dvd_nat_abs, int.coe_nat_dvd] at h,
rw [nat.modeq_iff_dvd, ← int.dvd_nat_abs, int.coe_nat_dvd],
exact hmn.mul_dvd_of_dvd_of_dvd h.1 h.2
end,
λ h, ⟨h.of_modeq_mul_right _, h.of_modeq_mul_left _⟩⟩
lemma coprime_of_mul_modeq_one (b : ℕ) {a n : ℕ} (h : a * b ≡ 1 [MOD n]) : coprime a n :=
nat.coprime_of_dvd' (λ k kp ⟨ka, hka⟩ ⟨kb, hkb⟩, int.coe_nat_dvd.1 begin
rw [hka, hkb, modeq_iff_dvd] at h,
cases h with z hz,
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hz,
rw [hz, int.coe_nat_mul, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, int.coe_nat_mul, ← mul_add],
exact dvd_mul_right _ _,
end)
@[simp] lemma mod_mul_right_mod (a b c : ℕ) : a % (b * c) % b = a % b :=
(mod_modeq _ _).of_modeq_mul_right _
@[simp] lemma mod_mul_left_mod (a b c : ℕ) : a % (b * c) % c = a % c :=
(mod_modeq _ _).of_modeq_mul_left _
lemma div_mod_eq_mod_mul_div (a b c : ℕ) : a / b % c = a % (b * c) / b :=
if hb0 : b = 0 then by simp [hb0]
else by rw [← @add_right_cancel_iff _ _ (c * (a / b / c)), mod_add_div, nat.div_div_eq_div_mul,
← nat.mul_right_inj (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hb0),← @add_left_cancel_iff _ _ (a % b), mod_add_div,
mul_add, ← @add_left_cancel_iff _ _ (a % (b * c) % b), add_left_comm,
← add_assoc (a % (b * c) % b), mod_add_div, ← mul_assoc, mod_add_div, mod_mul_right_mod]
lemma add_mod_add_ite (a b c : ℕ) :
(a + b) % c + (if c ≤ a % c + b % c then c else 0) = a % c + b % c :=
have (a + b) % c = (a % c + b % c) % c,
from ((mod_modeq _ _).add $ mod_modeq _ _).symm,
if hc0 : c = 0 then by simp [hc0]
else
begin
rw this,
split_ifs,
{ have h2 : (a % c + b % c) / c < 2,
from nat.div_lt_of_lt_mul (by rw mul_two;
exact add_lt_add (nat.mod_lt _ (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hc0))
(nat.mod_lt _ (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hc0))),
have h0 : 0 < (a % c + b % c) / c, from nat.div_pos h (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hc0),
rw [← @add_right_cancel_iff _ _ (c * ((a % c + b % c) / c)), add_comm _ c, add_assoc,
mod_add_div, le_antisymm (le_of_lt_succ h2) h0, mul_one, add_comm] },
{ rw [nat.mod_eq_of_lt (lt_of_not_ge h), add_zero] }
end
lemma add_mod_of_add_mod_lt {a b c : ℕ} (hc : a % c + b % c < c) :
(a + b) % c = a % c + b % c :=
by rw [← add_mod_add_ite, if_neg (not_le_of_lt hc), add_zero]
lemma add_mod_add_of_le_add_mod {a b c : ℕ} (hc : c ≤ a % c + b % c) :
(a + b) % c + c = a % c + b % c :=
by rw [← add_mod_add_ite, if_pos hc]
lemma add_div {a b c : ℕ} (hc0 : 0 < c) : (a + b) / c = a / c + b / c +
if c ≤ a % c + b % c then 1 else 0 :=
begin
rw [← nat.mul_right_inj hc0, ← @add_left_cancel_iff _ _ ((a + b) % c + a % c + b % c)],
suffices : (a + b) % c + c * ((a + b) / c) + a % c + b % c =
a % c + c * (a / c) + (b % c + c * (b / c)) + c * (if c ≤ a % c + b % c then 1 else 0) +
(a + b) % c,
{ simpa only [mul_add, add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc] },
rw [mod_add_div, mod_add_div, mod_add_div, mul_ite, add_assoc, add_assoc],
conv_lhs { rw ← add_mod_add_ite },
simp, ac_refl
end
lemma add_div_eq_of_add_mod_lt {a b c : ℕ} (hc : a % c + b % c < c) :
(a + b) / c = a / c + b / c :=
if hc0 : c = 0 then by simp [hc0]
else by rw [add_div (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hc0), if_neg (not_le_of_lt hc), add_zero]
protected lemma add_div_of_dvd_right {a b c : ℕ} (hca : c ∣ a) :
(a + b) / c = a / c + b / c :=
if h : c = 0 then by simp [h] else add_div_eq_of_add_mod_lt begin
rw [nat.mod_eq_zero_of_dvd hca, zero_add],
exact nat.mod_lt _ (pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr h),
end
protected lemma add_div_of_dvd_left {a b c : ℕ} (hca : c ∣ b) :
(a + b) / c = a / c + b / c :=
by rwa [add_comm, nat.add_div_of_dvd_right, add_comm]
lemma add_div_eq_of_le_mod_add_mod {a b c : ℕ} (hc : c ≤ a % c + b % c) (hc0 : 0 < c) :
(a + b) / c = a / c + b / c + 1 :=
by rw [add_div hc0, if_pos hc]
lemma add_div_le_add_div (a b c : ℕ) : a / c + b / c ≤ (a + b) / c :=
if hc0 : c = 0 then by simp [hc0]
else by rw [nat.add_div (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hc0)]; exact nat.le_add_right _ _
lemma le_mod_add_mod_of_dvd_add_of_not_dvd {a b c : ℕ} (h : c ∣ a + b) (ha : ¬ c ∣ a) :
c ≤ a % c + b % c :=
by_contradiction $ λ hc,
have (a + b) % c = a % c + b % c, from add_mod_of_add_mod_lt (lt_of_not_ge hc),
by simp [dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero, *] at *
lemma odd_mul_odd {n m : ℕ} : n % 2 = 1 → m % 2 = 1 → (n * m) % 2 = 1 :=
by simpa [nat.modeq] using @modeq.mul 2 n 1 m 1
lemma odd_mul_odd_div_two {m n : ℕ} (hm1 : m % 2 = 1) (hn1 : n % 2 = 1) :
(m * n) / 2 = m * (n / 2) + m / 2 :=
have hm0 : 0 < m := nat.pos_of_ne_zero (λ h, by simp * at *),
have hn0 : 0 < n := nat.pos_of_ne_zero (λ h, by simp * at *),
(nat.mul_right_inj zero_lt_two).1 $
by rw [mul_add, two_mul_odd_div_two hm1, mul_left_comm, two_mul_odd_div_two hn1,
two_mul_odd_div_two (nat.odd_mul_odd hm1 hn1), mul_tsub, mul_one,
← add_tsub_assoc_of_le (succ_le_of_lt hm0),
tsub_add_cancel_of_le (le_mul_of_one_le_right (nat.zero_le _) hn0)]
lemma odd_of_mod_four_eq_one {n : ℕ} : n % 4 = 1 → n % 2 = 1 :=
by simpa [modeq, show 2 * 2 = 4, by norm_num] using @modeq.of_modeq_mul_left 2 n 1 2
lemma odd_of_mod_four_eq_three {n : ℕ} : n % 4 = 3 → n % 2 = 1 :=
by simpa [modeq, show 2 * 2 = 4, by norm_num, show 3 % 4 = 3, by norm_num]
using @modeq.of_modeq_mul_left 2 n 3 2
/-- A natural number is odd iff it has residue `1` or `3` mod `4`-/
lemma odd_mod_four_iff {n : ℕ} : n % 2 = 1 ↔ n % 4 = 1 ∨ n % 4 = 3 :=
have help : ∀ (m : ℕ), m < 4 → m % 2 = 1 → m = 1 ∨ m = 3 := dec_trivial,
⟨λ hn, help (n % 4) (mod_lt n (by norm_num)) $ (mod_mod_of_dvd n (by norm_num : 2 ∣ 4)).trans hn,
λ h, or.dcases_on h odd_of_mod_four_eq_one odd_of_mod_four_eq_three⟩
end nat
namespace list
variable {α : Type*}
lemma nth_rotate : ∀ {l : list α} {n m : ℕ} (hml : m < l.length),
(l.rotate n).nth m = l.nth ((m + n) % l.length)
| [] n m hml := (nat.not_lt_zero _ hml).elim
| l 0 m hml := by simp [nat.mod_eq_of_lt hml]
| (a::l) (n+1) m hml :=
have h₃ : m < list.length (l ++ [a]), by simpa using hml,
(lt_or_eq_of_le (nat.le_of_lt_succ $ nat.mod_lt (m + n)
(lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.zero_le _) hml))).elim
(λ hml',
have h₁ : (m + (n + 1)) % ((a :: l : list α).length) =
(m + n) % ((a :: l : list α).length) + 1,
from calc (m + (n + 1)) % (l.length + 1) =
((m + n) % (l.length + 1) + 1) % (l.length + 1) :
add_assoc m n 1 ▸ nat.modeq.add_right 1 (nat.mod_mod _ _).symm
... = (m + n) % (l.length + 1) + 1 : nat.mod_eq_of_lt (nat.succ_lt_succ hml'),
have h₂ : (m + n) % (l ++ [a]).length < l.length, by simpa [nat.add_one] using hml',
by rw [list.rotate_cons_succ, nth_rotate h₃, list.nth_append h₂, h₁, list.nth]; simp)
(λ hml',
have h₁ : (m + (n + 1)) % (l.length + 1) = 0,
from calc (m + (n + 1)) % (l.length + 1) = (l.length + 1) % (l.length + 1) :
add_assoc m n 1 ▸ nat.modeq.add_right 1
(hml'.trans (nat.mod_eq_of_lt (nat.lt_succ_self _)).symm)
... = 0 : by simp,
by rw [list.length, list.rotate_cons_succ, nth_rotate h₃, list.length_append,
list.length_cons, list.length, zero_add, hml', h₁, list.nth_concat_length]; refl)
lemma rotate_eq_self_iff_eq_repeat [hα : nonempty α] : ∀ {l : list α},
(∀ n, l.rotate n = l) ↔ ∃ a, l = list.repeat a l.length
| [] := ⟨λ h, nonempty.elim hα (λ a, ⟨a, by simp⟩), by simp⟩
| (a::l) :=
⟨λ h, ⟨a, list.ext_le (by simp) $ λ n hn h₁,
begin
rw [← option.some_inj, ← list.nth_le_nth],
conv {to_lhs, rw ← h ((list.length (a :: l)) - n)},
rw [nth_rotate hn, add_tsub_cancel_of_le (le_of_lt hn),
nat.mod_self, nth_le_repeat], refl
end⟩,
λ ⟨a, ha⟩ n, ha.symm ▸ list.ext_le (by simp)
(λ m hm h,
have hm' : (m + n) % (list.repeat a (list.length (a :: l))).length < list.length (a :: l),
by rw list.length_repeat; exact nat.mod_lt _ (nat.succ_pos _),
by rw [nth_le_repeat, ← option.some_inj, ← list.nth_le_nth, nth_rotate h, list.nth_le_nth,
nth_le_repeat]; simp * at *)⟩
lemma rotate_repeat (a : α) (n : ℕ) (k : ℕ) :
(list.repeat a n).rotate k = list.repeat a n :=
let h : nonempty α := ⟨a⟩ in by exactI rotate_eq_self_iff_eq_repeat.mpr ⟨a, by rw length_repeat⟩ k
lemma rotate_one_eq_self_iff_eq_repeat [nonempty α] {l : list α} :
l.rotate 1 = l ↔ ∃ a : α, l = list.repeat a l.length :=
⟨λ h, rotate_eq_self_iff_eq_repeat.mp (λ n, nat.rec l.rotate_zero
(λ n hn, by rwa [nat.succ_eq_add_one, ←l.rotate_rotate, hn]) n),
λ h, rotate_eq_self_iff_eq_repeat.mpr h 1⟩
end list
|
78b4e6a4c05859ecfc9fbc5abfbd022c6b2fe87f | 35677d2df3f081738fa6b08138e03ee36bc33cad | /src/tactic/omega/nat/form.lean | 930a3b6d216eb85c55f92e9d6f488c5a4debebbf | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | gebner/mathlib | eab0150cc4f79ec45d2016a8c21750244a2e7ff0 | cc6a6edc397c55118df62831e23bfbd6e6c6b4ab | refs/heads/master | 1,625,574,853,976 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 99,101,412 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,586,716,389,000 | 1,501,667,958,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,770 | lean | /- Copyright (c) 2019 Seul Baek. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Seul Baek
Linear natural number arithmetic preformulas in pre-normalized preform. -/
import tactic.omega.nat.preterm
namespace omega
namespace nat
/-- Intermediate shadow syntax for LNA formulas that includes unreified exprs -/
meta inductive exprform
| eq : exprterm → exprterm → exprform
| le : exprterm → exprterm → exprform
| not : exprform → exprform
| or : exprform → exprform → exprform
| and : exprform → exprform → exprform
/-- Intermediate shadow syntax for LNA formulas that includes non-canonical terms -/
@[derive has_reflect, derive inhabited]
inductive preform
| eq : preterm → preterm → preform
| le : preterm → preterm → preform
| not : preform → preform
| or : preform → preform → preform
| and : preform → preform → preform
localized "notation x ` =* ` y := omega.nat.preform.eq x y" in omega.nat
localized "notation x ` ≤* ` y := omega.nat.preform.le x y" in omega.nat
localized "notation `¬* ` p := omega.nat.preform.not p" in omega.nat
localized "notation p ` ∨* ` q := omega.nat.preform.or p q" in omega.nat
localized "notation p ` ∧* ` q := omega.nat.preform.and p q" in omega.nat
namespace preform
/-- Evaluate a preform into prop using the valuation `v`. -/
@[simp] def holds (v : nat → nat) : preform → Prop
| (t =* s) := t.val v = s.val v
| (t ≤* s) := t.val v ≤ s.val v
| (¬* p) := ¬ p.holds
| (p ∨* q) := p.holds ∨ q.holds
| (p ∧* q) := p.holds ∧ q.holds
end preform
/-- `univ_close p n` := `p` closed by prepending `n` universal quantifiers -/
@[simp] def univ_close (p : preform) : (nat → nat) → nat → Prop
| v 0 := p.holds v
| v (k+1) := ∀ i : nat, univ_close (update_zero i v) k
namespace preform
/-- Argument is free of negations -/
def neg_free : preform → Prop
| (t =* s) := true
| (t ≤* s) := true
| (p ∨* q) := neg_free p ∧ neg_free q
| (p ∧* q) := neg_free p ∧ neg_free q
| _ := false
/-- Return expr of proof that argument is free of subtractions -/
def sub_free : preform → Prop
| (t =* s) := t.sub_free ∧ s.sub_free
| (t ≤* s) := t.sub_free ∧ s.sub_free
| (¬* p) := p.sub_free
| (p ∨* q) := p.sub_free ∧ q.sub_free
| (p ∧* q) := p.sub_free ∧ q.sub_free
/-- Fresh de Brujin index not used by any variable in argument -/
def fresh_index : preform → nat
| (t =* s) := max t.fresh_index s.fresh_index
| (t ≤* s) := max t.fresh_index s.fresh_index
| (¬* p) := p.fresh_index
| (p ∨* q) := max p.fresh_index q.fresh_index
| (p ∧* q) := max p.fresh_index q.fresh_index
lemma holds_constant {v w : nat → nat} :
∀ p : preform,
( (∀ x < p.fresh_index, v x = w x) →
(p.holds v ↔ p.holds w) )
| (t =* s) h1 :=
begin
simp only [holds],
apply pred_mono_2;
apply preterm.val_constant;
intros x h2; apply h1 _ (lt_of_lt_of_le h2 _),
apply le_max_left, apply le_max_right
end
| (t ≤* s) h1 :=
begin
simp only [holds],
apply pred_mono_2;
apply preterm.val_constant;
intros x h2; apply h1 _ (lt_of_lt_of_le h2 _),
apply le_max_left, apply le_max_right
end
| (¬* p) h1 :=
begin
apply not_iff_not_of_iff,
apply holds_constant p h1
end
| (p ∨* q) h1 :=
begin
simp only [holds],
apply pred_mono_2';
apply holds_constant;
intros x h2; apply h1 _ (lt_of_lt_of_le h2 _),
apply le_max_left, apply le_max_right
end
| (p ∧* q) h1 :=
begin
simp only [holds],
apply pred_mono_2';
apply holds_constant;
intros x h2; apply h1 _ (lt_of_lt_of_le h2 _),
apply le_max_left, apply le_max_right
end
/-- All valuations satisfy argument -/
def valid (p : preform) : Prop :=
∀ v, holds v p
/-- There exists some valuation that satisfies argument -/
def sat (p : preform) : Prop :=
∃ v, holds v p
/-- `implies p q` := under any valuation, `q` holds if `p` holds -/
def implies (p q : preform) : Prop :=
∀ v, (holds v p → holds v q)
/-- `equiv p q` := under any valuation, `p` holds iff `q` holds -/
def equiv (p q : preform) : Prop :=
∀ v, (holds v p ↔ holds v q)
lemma sat_of_implies_of_sat {p q : preform} :
implies p q → sat p → sat q :=
begin intros h1 h2, apply exists_imp_exists h1 h2 end
lemma sat_or {p q : preform} :
sat (p ∨* q) ↔ sat p ∨ sat q :=
begin
constructor; intro h1,
{ cases h1 with v h1, cases h1 with h1 h1;
[left,right]; refine ⟨v,_⟩; assumption },
{ cases h1 with h1 h1; cases h1 with v h1;
refine ⟨v,_⟩; [left,right]; assumption }
end
/-- There does not exist any valuation that satisfies argument -/
def unsat (p : preform) : Prop := ¬ sat p
def repr : preform → string
| (t =* s) := "(" ++ t.repr ++ " = " ++ s.repr ++ ")"
| (t ≤* s) := "(" ++ t.repr ++ " ≤ " ++ s.repr ++ ")"
| (¬* p) := "¬" ++ p.repr
| (p ∨* q) := "(" ++ p.repr ++ " ∨ " ++ q.repr ++ ")"
| (p ∧* q) := "(" ++ p.repr ++ " ∧ " ++ q.repr ++ ")"
instance has_repr : has_repr preform := ⟨repr⟩
meta instance has_to_format : has_to_format preform := ⟨λ x, x.repr⟩
end preform
lemma univ_close_of_valid {p : preform} :
∀ {m : nat} {v : nat → nat}, p.valid → univ_close p v m
| 0 v h1 := h1 _
| (m+1) v h1 := λ i, univ_close_of_valid h1
lemma valid_of_unsat_not {p : preform} : (¬*p).unsat → p.valid :=
begin
simp only [preform.sat, preform.unsat, preform.valid, preform.holds],
rw classical.not_exists_not, intro h, assumption
end
/-- Tactic for setting up proof by induction over preforms. -/
meta def preform.induce (t : tactic unit := tactic.skip) : tactic unit :=
`[ intro p, induction p with t s t s p ih p q ihp ihq p q ihp ihq; t ]
end nat
end omega
|
26a682b5b058ada81d0d31a90f988e1ecf58fb1f | 9be442d9ec2fcf442516ed6e9e1660aa9071b7bd | /tests/lean/run/lcnf1.lean | dc87a411fe13f78615daff5fa1d0c5bc35ad7371 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | EdAyers/lean4 | 57ac632d6b0789cb91fab2170e8c9e40441221bd | 37ba0df5841bde51dbc2329da81ac23d4f6a4de4 | refs/heads/master | 1,676,463,245,298 | 1,660,619,433,000 | 1,660,619,433,000 | 183,433,437 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,657,612,672,000 | 1,556,196,574,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,720 | lean | import Lean
open Lean
#eval Compiler.compile #[``List.map]
#eval Compiler.compile #[``Lean.Elab.Term.synthesizeInstMVarCore]
#eval Compiler.compile #[``Eq.ndrec]
def g1 (x : Nat) (h : Nat = Int) : Int :=
(h ▸ x) + 1
#eval Compiler.compile #[``g1]
def f (h : False) (x : Nat) : Nat :=
(h.rec : Nat → Nat) x
#eval Compiler.compile #[``f]
def g (as : Array (Nat → Nat)) (h : i < as.size ∧ q) : Nat :=
h.casesOn (fun _ _ => as[i]) i
#eval Compiler.compile #[``g]
def f2 {r : Nat → Nat → Prop} (q : Quot r) : Nat :=
(q.lift (·+·) sorry : Nat → Nat) 2
#eval Compiler.compile #[``f2]
inductive Vec (α : Type u) : Nat → Type u
| nil : Vec α 0
| cons : α → Vec α n → Vec α (n+1)
def Vec.zip : Vec α n → Vec β n → Vec (α × β) n
| .cons a as, .cons b bs => .cons (a, b) (zip as bs)
| .nil, .nil => .nil
def Vec.head : Vec α (n+1) → α
| .cons a _ => a
#eval Compiler.compile #[``Lean.Elab.Term.reportStuckSyntheticMVar]
#eval Compiler.compile #[``Lean.Elab.Term.synthesizeSyntheticMVars]
set_option profiler true
set_option trace.Compiler.step true
#eval Compiler.compile #[``Lean.Meta.isExprDefEqAuxImpl]
def foo (a b : Nat) :=
let d := match a with
| .zero => b
| .succ c => c
let e := match b with
| .zero => a
| .succ f => f
Nat.add d e
#eval Compiler.compile #[``foo]
#eval Compiler.compile #[``Vec.zip]
structure Foo where
α : Sort u
x : α
def foo1 := Foo.mk Type Nat
#eval Compiler.compile #[``foo1]
def Tuple (α : Type u) : Nat → Type u
| 0 => PUnit
| 1 => α
| n+2 => α × Tuple α (n+1)
def mkConstTuple (a : α) : (n : Nat) → Tuple α n
| 0 => ⟨⟩
| 1 => a
| n+2 => (a, mkConstTuple a (n+1))
def Tuple.map (f : α → β) (xs : Tuple α n) : Tuple β n :=
match n with
| 0 => ⟨⟩
| 1 => f xs
| _+2 => match xs with
| (a, xs) => (f a, Tuple.map f xs)
def Tuple.example (a b : Nat) :=
Tuple.map (n := 2) (· + 1) (a, b)
#eval Compiler.compile #[``mkConstTuple]
#eval Compiler.compile #[``Tuple.map]
#eval Compiler.compile #[``Tuple.example]
def gebner1 (x : UInt64) : UInt64 := assert! x > 0; x - 1
-- set_option pp.letVarTypes true in
#eval Compiler.compile #[``gebner1]
def gebner2 (x : UInt64) := x &&& ((1 : UInt64) <<< 5 : UInt64)
-- set_option pp.letVarTypes true in
#eval Compiler.compile #[``gebner2]
#eval Compiler.compile #[``Lean.Meta.instMonadMetaM]
#eval Compiler.compile #[``Lean.Core.instMonadCoreM]
#eval Compiler.compile #[``instMonadEIO]
-- set_option pp.explicit true in
#eval Compiler.compile #[``EStateM.instMonadEStateM]
#eval do
let some decl ← Compiler.getStage1Decl? ``List.length | throwError "not found"
IO.println (← decl.toString)
|
d775ecd71de7edcc009d2158cb8333b1ab717483 | 57c233acf9386e610d99ed20ef139c5f97504ba3 | /src/topology/algebra/infinite_sum.lean | 7af2ba7247d4c6a78b15a1b871fa4537b5063b41 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | robertylewis/mathlib | 3d16e3e6daf5ddde182473e03a1b601d2810952c | 1d13f5b932f5e40a8308e3840f96fc882fae01f0 | refs/heads/master | 1,651,379,945,369 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 98,875,504 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,644,253,514,000 | 1,501,495,700,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 61,033 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import algebra.big_operators.intervals
import algebra.big_operators.nat_antidiagonal
import data.equiv.encodable.lattice
import topology.algebra.mul_action
import topology.algebra.ordered.monotone_convergence
import topology.instances.real
/-!
# Infinite sum over a topological monoid
This sum is known as unconditionally convergent, as it sums to the same value under all possible
permutations. For Euclidean spaces (finite dimensional Banach spaces) this is equivalent to absolute
convergence.
Note: There are summable sequences which are not unconditionally convergent! The other way holds
generally, see `has_sum.tendsto_sum_nat`.
## References
* Bourbaki: General Topology (1995), Chapter 3 §5 (Infinite sums in commutative groups)
-/
noncomputable theory
open finset filter function classical
open_locale topological_space classical big_operators nnreal
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*}
section has_sum
variables [add_comm_monoid α] [topological_space α]
/-- Infinite sum on a topological monoid
The `at_top` filter on `finset β` is the limit of all finite sets towards the entire type. So we sum
up bigger and bigger sets. This sum operation is invariant under reordering. In particular,
the function `ℕ → ℝ` sending `n` to `(-1)^n / (n+1)` does not have a
sum for this definition, but a series which is absolutely convergent will have the correct sum.
This is based on Mario Carneiro's
[infinite sum `df-tsms` in Metamath](http://us.metamath.org/mpeuni/df-tsms.html).
For the definition or many statements, `α` does not need to be a topological monoid. We only add
this assumption later, for the lemmas where it is relevant.
-/
def has_sum (f : β → α) (a : α) : Prop := tendsto (λs:finset β, ∑ b in s, f b) at_top (𝓝 a)
/-- `summable f` means that `f` has some (infinite) sum. Use `tsum` to get the value. -/
def summable (f : β → α) : Prop := ∃a, has_sum f a
/-- `∑' i, f i` is the sum of `f` it exists, or 0 otherwise -/
@[irreducible] def tsum {β} (f : β → α) := if h : summable f then classical.some h else 0
-- see Note [operator precedence of big operators]
notation `∑'` binders `, ` r:(scoped:67 f, tsum f) := r
variables {f g : β → α} {a b : α} {s : finset β}
lemma summable.has_sum (ha : summable f) : has_sum f (∑'b, f b) :=
by simp [ha, tsum]; exact some_spec ha
lemma has_sum.summable (h : has_sum f a) : summable f := ⟨a, h⟩
/-- Constant zero function has sum `0` -/
lemma has_sum_zero : has_sum (λb, 0 : β → α) 0 :=
by simp [has_sum, tendsto_const_nhds]
lemma has_sum_empty [is_empty β] : has_sum f 0 :=
by convert has_sum_zero
lemma summable_zero : summable (λb, 0 : β → α) := has_sum_zero.summable
lemma summable_empty [is_empty β] : summable f := has_sum_empty.summable
lemma tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable (h : ¬ summable f) : ∑'b, f b = 0 :=
by simp [tsum, h]
lemma summable_congr (hfg : ∀b, f b = g b) :
summable f ↔ summable g :=
iff_of_eq (congr_arg summable $ funext hfg)
lemma summable.congr (hf : summable f) (hfg : ∀b, f b = g b) :
summable g :=
(summable_congr hfg).mp hf
lemma has_sum.has_sum_of_sum_eq {g : γ → α}
(h_eq : ∀u:finset γ, ∃v:finset β, ∀v', v ⊆ v' → ∃u', u ⊆ u' ∧ ∑ x in u', g x = ∑ b in v', f b)
(hf : has_sum g a) :
has_sum f a :=
le_trans (map_at_top_finset_sum_le_of_sum_eq h_eq) hf
lemma has_sum_iff_has_sum {g : γ → α}
(h₁ : ∀u:finset γ, ∃v:finset β, ∀v', v ⊆ v' → ∃u', u ⊆ u' ∧ ∑ x in u', g x = ∑ b in v', f b)
(h₂ : ∀v:finset β, ∃u:finset γ, ∀u', u ⊆ u' → ∃v', v ⊆ v' ∧ ∑ b in v', f b = ∑ x in u', g x) :
has_sum f a ↔ has_sum g a :=
⟨has_sum.has_sum_of_sum_eq h₂, has_sum.has_sum_of_sum_eq h₁⟩
lemma function.injective.has_sum_iff {g : γ → β} (hg : injective g)
(hf : ∀ x ∉ set.range g, f x = 0) :
has_sum (f ∘ g) a ↔ has_sum f a :=
by simp only [has_sum, tendsto, hg.map_at_top_finset_sum_eq hf]
lemma function.injective.summable_iff {g : γ → β} (hg : injective g)
(hf : ∀ x ∉ set.range g, f x = 0) :
summable (f ∘ g) ↔ summable f :=
exists_congr $ λ _, hg.has_sum_iff hf
lemma has_sum_subtype_iff_of_support_subset {s : set β} (hf : support f ⊆ s) :
has_sum (f ∘ coe : s → α) a ↔ has_sum f a :=
subtype.coe_injective.has_sum_iff $ by simpa using support_subset_iff'.1 hf
lemma has_sum_subtype_iff_indicator {s : set β} :
has_sum (f ∘ coe : s → α) a ↔ has_sum (s.indicator f) a :=
by rw [← set.indicator_range_comp, subtype.range_coe,
has_sum_subtype_iff_of_support_subset set.support_indicator_subset]
@[simp] lemma has_sum_subtype_support : has_sum (f ∘ coe : support f → α) a ↔ has_sum f a :=
has_sum_subtype_iff_of_support_subset $ set.subset.refl _
lemma has_sum_fintype [fintype β] (f : β → α) : has_sum f (∑ b, f b) :=
order_top.tendsto_at_top_nhds _
protected lemma finset.has_sum (s : finset β) (f : β → α) :
has_sum (f ∘ coe : (↑s : set β) → α) (∑ b in s, f b) :=
by { rw ← sum_attach, exact has_sum_fintype _ }
protected lemma finset.summable (s : finset β) (f : β → α) :
summable (f ∘ coe : (↑s : set β) → α) :=
(s.has_sum f).summable
protected lemma set.finite.summable {s : set β} (hs : s.finite) (f : β → α) :
summable (f ∘ coe : s → α) :=
by convert hs.to_finset.summable f; simp only [hs.coe_to_finset]
/-- If a function `f` vanishes outside of a finite set `s`, then it `has_sum` `∑ b in s, f b`. -/
lemma has_sum_sum_of_ne_finset_zero (hf : ∀b∉s, f b = 0) : has_sum f (∑ b in s, f b) :=
(has_sum_subtype_iff_of_support_subset $ support_subset_iff'.2 hf).1 $ s.has_sum f
lemma summable_of_ne_finset_zero (hf : ∀b∉s, f b = 0) : summable f :=
(has_sum_sum_of_ne_finset_zero hf).summable
lemma has_sum_single {f : β → α} (b : β) (hf : ∀b' ≠ b, f b' = 0) :
has_sum f (f b) :=
suffices has_sum f (∑ b' in {b}, f b'),
by simpa using this,
has_sum_sum_of_ne_finset_zero $ by simpa [hf]
lemma has_sum_ite_eq (b : β) [decidable_pred (= b)] (a : α) :
has_sum (λb', if b' = b then a else 0) a :=
begin
convert has_sum_single b _,
{ exact (if_pos rfl).symm },
assume b' hb',
exact if_neg hb'
end
lemma equiv.has_sum_iff (e : γ ≃ β) :
has_sum (f ∘ e) a ↔ has_sum f a :=
e.injective.has_sum_iff $ by simp
lemma function.injective.has_sum_range_iff {g : γ → β} (hg : injective g) :
has_sum (λ x : set.range g, f x) a ↔ has_sum (f ∘ g) a :=
(equiv.of_injective g hg).has_sum_iff.symm
lemma equiv.summable_iff (e : γ ≃ β) :
summable (f ∘ e) ↔ summable f :=
exists_congr $ λ a, e.has_sum_iff
lemma summable.prod_symm {f : β × γ → α} (hf : summable f) : summable (λ p : γ × β, f p.swap) :=
(equiv.prod_comm γ β).summable_iff.2 hf
lemma equiv.has_sum_iff_of_support {g : γ → α} (e : support f ≃ support g)
(he : ∀ x : support f, g (e x) = f x) :
has_sum f a ↔ has_sum g a :=
have (g ∘ coe) ∘ e = f ∘ coe, from funext he,
by rw [← has_sum_subtype_support, ← this, e.has_sum_iff, has_sum_subtype_support]
lemma has_sum_iff_has_sum_of_ne_zero_bij {g : γ → α} (i : support g → β)
(hi : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, i x = i y → (x : γ) = y)
(hf : support f ⊆ set.range i) (hfg : ∀ x, f (i x) = g x) :
has_sum f a ↔ has_sum g a :=
iff.symm $ equiv.has_sum_iff_of_support
(equiv.of_bijective (λ x, ⟨i x, λ hx, x.coe_prop $ hfg x ▸ hx⟩)
⟨λ x y h, subtype.ext $ hi $ subtype.ext_iff.1 h,
λ y, (hf y.coe_prop).imp $ λ x hx, subtype.ext hx⟩)
hfg
lemma equiv.summable_iff_of_support {g : γ → α} (e : support f ≃ support g)
(he : ∀ x : support f, g (e x) = f x) :
summable f ↔ summable g :=
exists_congr $ λ _, e.has_sum_iff_of_support he
protected lemma has_sum.map [add_comm_monoid γ] [topological_space γ] (hf : has_sum f a)
(g : α →+ γ) (hg : continuous g) :
has_sum (g ∘ f) (g a) :=
have g ∘ (λs:finset β, ∑ b in s, f b) = (λs:finset β, ∑ b in s, g (f b)),
from funext $ g.map_sum _,
show tendsto (λs:finset β, ∑ b in s, g (f b)) at_top (𝓝 (g a)),
from this ▸ (hg.tendsto a).comp hf
protected lemma summable.map [add_comm_monoid γ] [topological_space γ] (hf : summable f)
(g : α →+ γ) (hg : continuous g) :
summable (g ∘ f) :=
(hf.has_sum.map g hg).summable
/-- If `f : ℕ → α` has sum `a`, then the partial sums `∑_{i=0}^{n-1} f i` converge to `a`. -/
lemma has_sum.tendsto_sum_nat {f : ℕ → α} (h : has_sum f a) :
tendsto (λn:ℕ, ∑ i in range n, f i) at_top (𝓝 a) :=
h.comp tendsto_finset_range
lemma has_sum.unique {a₁ a₂ : α} [t2_space α] : has_sum f a₁ → has_sum f a₂ → a₁ = a₂ :=
tendsto_nhds_unique
lemma summable.has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat [t2_space α] {f : ℕ → α} {a : α} (hf : summable f) :
has_sum f a ↔ tendsto (λn:ℕ, ∑ i in range n, f i) at_top (𝓝 a) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, h.tendsto_sum_nat, λ h, _⟩,
rw tendsto_nhds_unique h hf.has_sum.tendsto_sum_nat,
exact hf.has_sum
end
lemma equiv.summable_iff_of_has_sum_iff {α' : Type*} [add_comm_monoid α']
[topological_space α'] (e : α' ≃ α) {f : β → α} {g : γ → α'}
(he : ∀ {a}, has_sum f (e a) ↔ has_sum g a) :
summable f ↔ summable g :=
⟨λ ⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨e.symm a, he.1 $ by rwa [e.apply_symm_apply]⟩, λ ⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨e a, he.2 ha⟩⟩
variable [has_continuous_add α]
lemma has_sum.add (hf : has_sum f a) (hg : has_sum g b) : has_sum (λb, f b + g b) (a + b) :=
by simp only [has_sum, sum_add_distrib]; exact hf.add hg
lemma summable.add (hf : summable f) (hg : summable g) : summable (λb, f b + g b) :=
(hf.has_sum.add hg.has_sum).summable
lemma has_sum_sum {f : γ → β → α} {a : γ → α} {s : finset γ} :
(∀i∈s, has_sum (f i) (a i)) → has_sum (λb, ∑ i in s, f i b) (∑ i in s, a i) :=
finset.induction_on s (by simp only [has_sum_zero, sum_empty, forall_true_iff])
(by simp only [has_sum.add, sum_insert, mem_insert, forall_eq_or_imp,
forall_2_true_iff, not_false_iff, forall_true_iff] {contextual := tt})
lemma summable_sum {f : γ → β → α} {s : finset γ} (hf : ∀i∈s, summable (f i)) :
summable (λb, ∑ i in s, f i b) :=
(has_sum_sum $ assume i hi, (hf i hi).has_sum).summable
lemma has_sum.add_disjoint {s t : set β} (hs : disjoint s t)
(ha : has_sum (f ∘ coe : s → α) a) (hb : has_sum (f ∘ coe : t → α) b) :
has_sum (f ∘ coe : s ∪ t → α) (a + b) :=
begin
rw has_sum_subtype_iff_indicator at *,
rw set.indicator_union_of_disjoint hs,
exact ha.add hb
end
lemma has_sum.add_is_compl {s t : set β} (hs : is_compl s t)
(ha : has_sum (f ∘ coe : s → α) a) (hb : has_sum (f ∘ coe : t → α) b) :
has_sum f (a + b) :=
by simpa [← hs.compl_eq]
using (has_sum_subtype_iff_indicator.1 ha).add (has_sum_subtype_iff_indicator.1 hb)
lemma has_sum.add_compl {s : set β} (ha : has_sum (f ∘ coe : s → α) a)
(hb : has_sum (f ∘ coe : sᶜ → α) b) :
has_sum f (a + b) :=
ha.add_is_compl is_compl_compl hb
lemma summable.add_compl {s : set β} (hs : summable (f ∘ coe : s → α))
(hsc : summable (f ∘ coe : sᶜ → α)) :
summable f :=
(hs.has_sum.add_compl hsc.has_sum).summable
lemma has_sum.compl_add {s : set β} (ha : has_sum (f ∘ coe : sᶜ → α) a)
(hb : has_sum (f ∘ coe : s → α) b) :
has_sum f (a + b) :=
ha.add_is_compl is_compl_compl.symm hb
lemma has_sum.even_add_odd {f : ℕ → α} (he : has_sum (λ k, f (2 * k)) a)
(ho : has_sum (λ k, f (2 * k + 1)) b) :
has_sum f (a + b) :=
begin
have := mul_right_injective₀ (@two_ne_zero ℕ _ _),
replace he := this.has_sum_range_iff.2 he,
replace ho := ((add_left_injective 1).comp this).has_sum_range_iff.2 ho,
refine he.add_is_compl _ ho,
simpa [(∘)] using nat.is_compl_even_odd
end
lemma summable.compl_add {s : set β} (hs : summable (f ∘ coe : sᶜ → α))
(hsc : summable (f ∘ coe : s → α)) :
summable f :=
(hs.has_sum.compl_add hsc.has_sum).summable
lemma summable.even_add_odd {f : ℕ → α} (he : summable (λ k, f (2 * k)))
(ho : summable (λ k, f (2 * k + 1))) :
summable f :=
(he.has_sum.even_add_odd ho.has_sum).summable
lemma has_sum.sigma [regular_space α] {γ : β → Type*} {f : (Σ b:β, γ b) → α} {g : β → α} {a : α}
(ha : has_sum f a) (hf : ∀b, has_sum (λc, f ⟨b, c⟩) (g b)) : has_sum g a :=
begin
refine (at_top_basis.tendsto_iff (closed_nhds_basis a)).mpr _,
rintros s ⟨hs, hsc⟩,
rcases mem_at_top_sets.mp (ha hs) with ⟨u, hu⟩,
use [u.image sigma.fst, trivial],
intros bs hbs,
simp only [set.mem_preimage, ge_iff_le, finset.le_iff_subset] at hu,
have : tendsto (λ t : finset (Σ b, γ b), ∑ p in t.filter (λ p, p.1 ∈ bs), f p)
at_top (𝓝 $ ∑ b in bs, g b),
{ simp only [← sigma_preimage_mk, sum_sigma],
refine tendsto_finset_sum _ (λ b hb, _),
change tendsto (λ t, (λ t, ∑ s in t, f ⟨b, s⟩) (preimage t (sigma.mk b) _)) at_top (𝓝 (g b)),
exact tendsto.comp (hf b) (tendsto_finset_preimage_at_top_at_top _) },
refine hsc.mem_of_tendsto this (eventually_at_top.2 ⟨u, λ t ht, hu _ (λ x hx, _)⟩),
exact mem_filter.2 ⟨ht hx, hbs $ mem_image_of_mem _ hx⟩
end
/-- If a series `f` on `β × γ` has sum `a` and for each `b` the restriction of `f` to `{b} × γ`
has sum `g b`, then the series `g` has sum `a`. -/
lemma has_sum.prod_fiberwise [regular_space α] {f : β × γ → α} {g : β → α} {a : α}
(ha : has_sum f a) (hf : ∀b, has_sum (λc, f (b, c)) (g b)) :
has_sum g a :=
has_sum.sigma ((equiv.sigma_equiv_prod β γ).has_sum_iff.2 ha) hf
lemma summable.sigma' [regular_space α] {γ : β → Type*} {f : (Σb:β, γ b) → α}
(ha : summable f) (hf : ∀b, summable (λc, f ⟨b, c⟩)) :
summable (λb, ∑'c, f ⟨b, c⟩) :=
(ha.has_sum.sigma (assume b, (hf b).has_sum)).summable
lemma has_sum.sigma_of_has_sum [regular_space α] {γ : β → Type*} {f : (Σ b:β, γ b) → α} {g : β → α}
{a : α} (ha : has_sum g a) (hf : ∀b, has_sum (λc, f ⟨b, c⟩) (g b)) (hf' : summable f) :
has_sum f a :=
by simpa [(hf'.has_sum.sigma hf).unique ha] using hf'.has_sum
end has_sum
section tsum
variables [add_comm_monoid α] [topological_space α]
lemma tsum_congr_subtype (f : β → α) {s t : set β} (h : s = t) :
∑' (x : s), f x = ∑' (x : t), f x :=
by rw h
variables [t2_space α] {f g : β → α} {a a₁ a₂ : α}
lemma has_sum.tsum_eq (ha : has_sum f a) : ∑'b, f b = a :=
(summable.has_sum ⟨a, ha⟩).unique ha
lemma summable.has_sum_iff (h : summable f) : has_sum f a ↔ ∑'b, f b = a :=
iff.intro has_sum.tsum_eq (assume eq, eq ▸ h.has_sum)
@[simp] lemma tsum_zero : ∑'b:β, (0:α) = 0 := has_sum_zero.tsum_eq
@[simp] lemma tsum_empty [is_empty β] : ∑'b, f b = 0 := has_sum_empty.tsum_eq
lemma tsum_eq_sum {f : β → α} {s : finset β} (hf : ∀b∉s, f b = 0) :
∑' b, f b = ∑ b in s, f b :=
(has_sum_sum_of_ne_finset_zero hf).tsum_eq
lemma tsum_congr {α β : Type*} [add_comm_monoid α] [topological_space α]
{f g : β → α} (hfg : ∀ b, f b = g b) : ∑' b, f b = ∑' b, g b :=
congr_arg tsum (funext hfg)
lemma tsum_fintype [fintype β] (f : β → α) : ∑'b, f b = ∑ b, f b :=
(has_sum_fintype f).tsum_eq
lemma tsum_bool (f : bool → α) : ∑' i : bool, f i = f false + f true :=
by { rw [tsum_fintype, finset.sum_eq_add]; simp }
@[simp] lemma finset.tsum_subtype (s : finset β) (f : β → α) :
∑' x : {x // x ∈ s}, f x = ∑ x in s, f x :=
(s.has_sum f).tsum_eq
@[simp] lemma finset.tsum_subtype' (s : finset β) (f : β → α) :
∑' x : (s : set β), f x = ∑ x in s, f x :=
s.tsum_subtype f
lemma tsum_eq_single {f : β → α} (b : β) (hf : ∀b' ≠ b, f b' = 0) :
∑'b, f b = f b :=
(has_sum_single b hf).tsum_eq
@[simp] lemma tsum_ite_eq (b : β) [decidable_pred (= b)] (a : α) :
∑' b', (if b' = b then a else 0) = a :=
(has_sum_ite_eq b a).tsum_eq
lemma tsum_dite_right (P : Prop) [decidable P] (x : β → ¬ P → α) :
∑' (b : β), (if h : P then (0 : α) else x b h) = if h : P then (0 : α) else ∑' (b : β), x b h :=
by by_cases hP : P; simp [hP]
lemma tsum_dite_left (P : Prop) [decidable P] (x : β → P → α) :
∑' (b : β), (if h : P then x b h else 0) = if h : P then (∑' (b : β), x b h) else 0 :=
by by_cases hP : P; simp [hP]
lemma equiv.tsum_eq_tsum_of_has_sum_iff_has_sum {α' : Type*} [add_comm_monoid α']
[topological_space α'] (e : α' ≃ α) (h0 : e 0 = 0) {f : β → α} {g : γ → α'}
(h : ∀ {a}, has_sum f (e a) ↔ has_sum g a) :
∑' b, f b = e (∑' c, g c) :=
by_cases
(assume : summable g, (h.mpr this.has_sum).tsum_eq)
(assume hg : ¬ summable g,
have hf : ¬ summable f, from mt (e.summable_iff_of_has_sum_iff @h).1 hg,
by simp [tsum, hf, hg, h0])
lemma tsum_eq_tsum_of_has_sum_iff_has_sum {f : β → α} {g : γ → α}
(h : ∀{a}, has_sum f a ↔ has_sum g a) :
∑'b, f b = ∑'c, g c :=
(equiv.refl α).tsum_eq_tsum_of_has_sum_iff_has_sum rfl @h
lemma equiv.tsum_eq (j : γ ≃ β) (f : β → α) : ∑'c, f (j c) = ∑'b, f b :=
tsum_eq_tsum_of_has_sum_iff_has_sum $ λ a, j.has_sum_iff
lemma equiv.tsum_eq_tsum_of_support {f : β → α} {g : γ → α} (e : support f ≃ support g)
(he : ∀ x, g (e x) = f x) :
(∑' x, f x) = ∑' y, g y :=
tsum_eq_tsum_of_has_sum_iff_has_sum $ λ _, e.has_sum_iff_of_support he
lemma tsum_eq_tsum_of_ne_zero_bij {g : γ → α} (i : support g → β)
(hi : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, i x = i y → (x : γ) = y)
(hf : support f ⊆ set.range i) (hfg : ∀ x, f (i x) = g x) :
∑' x, f x = ∑' y, g y :=
tsum_eq_tsum_of_has_sum_iff_has_sum $ λ _, has_sum_iff_has_sum_of_ne_zero_bij i hi hf hfg
lemma tsum_subtype (s : set β) (f : β → α) :
∑' x:s, f x = ∑' x, s.indicator f x :=
tsum_eq_tsum_of_has_sum_iff_has_sum $ λ _, has_sum_subtype_iff_indicator
section has_continuous_add
variable [has_continuous_add α]
lemma tsum_add (hf : summable f) (hg : summable g) : ∑'b, (f b + g b) = (∑'b, f b) + (∑'b, g b) :=
(hf.has_sum.add hg.has_sum).tsum_eq
lemma tsum_sum {f : γ → β → α} {s : finset γ} (hf : ∀i∈s, summable (f i)) :
∑'b, ∑ i in s, f i b = ∑ i in s, ∑'b, f i b :=
(has_sum_sum $ assume i hi, (hf i hi).has_sum).tsum_eq
lemma tsum_sigma' [regular_space α] {γ : β → Type*} {f : (Σb:β, γ b) → α}
(h₁ : ∀b, summable (λc, f ⟨b, c⟩)) (h₂ : summable f) : ∑'p, f p = ∑'b c, f ⟨b, c⟩ :=
(h₂.has_sum.sigma (assume b, (h₁ b).has_sum)).tsum_eq.symm
lemma tsum_prod' [regular_space α] {f : β × γ → α} (h : summable f)
(h₁ : ∀b, summable (λc, f (b, c))) :
∑'p, f p = ∑'b c, f (b, c) :=
(h.has_sum.prod_fiberwise (assume b, (h₁ b).has_sum)).tsum_eq.symm
lemma tsum_comm' [regular_space α] {f : β → γ → α} (h : summable (function.uncurry f))
(h₁ : ∀b, summable (f b)) (h₂ : ∀ c, summable (λ b, f b c)) :
∑' c b, f b c = ∑' b c, f b c :=
begin
erw [← tsum_prod' h h₁, ← tsum_prod' h.prod_symm h₂, ← (equiv.prod_comm β γ).tsum_eq],
refl,
assumption
end
end has_continuous_add
section encodable
open encodable
variable [encodable γ]
/-- You can compute a sum over an encodably type by summing over the natural numbers and
taking a supremum. This is useful for outer measures. -/
theorem tsum_supr_decode₂ [complete_lattice β] (m : β → α) (m0 : m ⊥ = 0)
(s : γ → β) : ∑' i : ℕ, m (⨆ b ∈ decode₂ γ i, s b) = ∑' b : γ, m (s b) :=
begin
have H : ∀ n, m (⨆ b ∈ decode₂ γ n, s b) ≠ 0 → (decode₂ γ n).is_some,
{ intros n h,
cases decode₂ γ n with b,
{ refine (h $ by simp [m0]).elim },
{ exact rfl } },
symmetry, refine tsum_eq_tsum_of_ne_zero_bij (λ a, option.get (H a.1 a.2)) _ _ _,
{ rintros ⟨m, hm⟩ ⟨n, hn⟩ e,
have := mem_decode₂.1 (option.get_mem (H n hn)),
rwa [← e, mem_decode₂.1 (option.get_mem (H m hm))] at this },
{ intros b h,
refine ⟨⟨encode b, _⟩, _⟩,
{ simp only [mem_support, encodek₂] at h ⊢, convert h, simp [set.ext_iff, encodek₂] },
{ exact option.get_of_mem _ (encodek₂ _) } },
{ rintros ⟨n, h⟩, dsimp only [subtype.coe_mk],
transitivity, swap,
rw [show decode₂ γ n = _, from option.get_mem (H n h)],
congr, simp [ext_iff, -option.some_get] }
end
/-- `tsum_supr_decode₂` specialized to the complete lattice of sets. -/
theorem tsum_Union_decode₂ (m : set β → α) (m0 : m ∅ = 0)
(s : γ → set β) : ∑' i, m (⋃ b ∈ decode₂ γ i, s b) = ∑' b, m (s b) :=
tsum_supr_decode₂ m m0 s
/-! Some properties about measure-like functions.
These could also be functions defined on complete sublattices of sets, with the property
that they are countably sub-additive.
`R` will probably be instantiated with `(≤)` in all applications.
-/
/-- If a function is countably sub-additive then it is sub-additive on encodable types -/
theorem rel_supr_tsum [complete_lattice β] (m : β → α) (m0 : m ⊥ = 0)
(R : α → α → Prop) (m_supr : ∀(s : ℕ → β), R (m (⨆ i, s i)) ∑' i, m (s i))
(s : γ → β) : R (m (⨆ b : γ, s b)) ∑' b : γ, m (s b) :=
by { rw [← supr_decode₂, ← tsum_supr_decode₂ _ m0 s], exact m_supr _ }
/-- If a function is countably sub-additive then it is sub-additive on finite sets -/
theorem rel_supr_sum [complete_lattice β] (m : β → α) (m0 : m ⊥ = 0)
(R : α → α → Prop) (m_supr : ∀(s : ℕ → β), R (m (⨆ i, s i)) (∑' i, m (s i)))
(s : δ → β) (t : finset δ) :
R (m (⨆ d ∈ t, s d)) (∑ d in t, m (s d)) :=
by { cases t.nonempty_encodable, rw [supr_subtype'], convert rel_supr_tsum m m0 R m_supr _,
rw [← finset.tsum_subtype], assumption }
/-- If a function is countably sub-additive then it is binary sub-additive -/
theorem rel_sup_add [complete_lattice β] (m : β → α) (m0 : m ⊥ = 0)
(R : α → α → Prop) (m_supr : ∀(s : ℕ → β), R (m (⨆ i, s i)) (∑' i, m (s i)))
(s₁ s₂ : β) : R (m (s₁ ⊔ s₂)) (m s₁ + m s₂) :=
begin
convert rel_supr_tsum m m0 R m_supr (λ b, cond b s₁ s₂),
{ simp only [supr_bool_eq, cond] },
{ rw [tsum_fintype, fintype.sum_bool, cond, cond] }
end
end encodable
variables [has_continuous_add α]
lemma tsum_add_tsum_compl {s : set β} (hs : summable (f ∘ coe : s → α))
(hsc : summable (f ∘ coe : sᶜ → α)) :
(∑' x : s, f x) + (∑' x : sᶜ, f x) = ∑' x, f x :=
(hs.has_sum.add_compl hsc.has_sum).tsum_eq.symm
lemma tsum_union_disjoint {s t : set β} (hd : disjoint s t)
(hs : summable (f ∘ coe : s → α)) (ht : summable (f ∘ coe : t → α)) :
(∑' x : s ∪ t, f x) = (∑' x : s, f x) + (∑' x : t, f x) :=
(hs.has_sum.add_disjoint hd ht.has_sum).tsum_eq
lemma tsum_even_add_odd {f : ℕ → α} (he : summable (λ k, f (2 * k)))
(ho : summable (λ k, f (2 * k + 1))) :
(∑' k, f (2 * k)) + (∑' k, f (2 * k + 1)) = ∑' k, f k :=
(he.has_sum.even_add_odd ho.has_sum).tsum_eq.symm
end tsum
section prod
variables [add_comm_monoid α] [topological_space α] [add_comm_monoid γ] [topological_space γ]
lemma has_sum.prod_mk {f : β → α} {g : β → γ} {a : α} {b : γ}
(hf : has_sum f a) (hg : has_sum g b) :
has_sum (λ x, (⟨f x, g x⟩ : α × γ)) ⟨a, b⟩ :=
by simp [has_sum, ← prod_mk_sum, filter.tendsto.prod_mk_nhds hf hg]
end prod
section pi
variables {ι : Type*} {π : α → Type*} [∀ x, add_comm_monoid (π x)] [∀ x, topological_space (π x)]
lemma pi.has_sum {f : ι → ∀ x, π x} {g : ∀ x, π x} :
has_sum f g ↔ ∀ x, has_sum (λ i, f i x) (g x) :=
by simp only [has_sum, tendsto_pi_nhds, sum_apply]
lemma pi.summable {f : ι → ∀ x, π x} : summable f ↔ ∀ x, summable (λ i, f i x) :=
by simp only [summable, pi.has_sum, skolem]
lemma tsum_apply [∀ x, t2_space (π x)] {f : ι → ∀ x, π x}{x : α} (hf : summable f) :
(∑' i, f i) x = ∑' i, f i x :=
(pi.has_sum.mp hf.has_sum x).tsum_eq.symm
end pi
section topological_group
variables [add_comm_group α] [topological_space α] [topological_add_group α]
variables {f g : β → α} {a a₁ a₂ : α}
-- `by simpa using` speeds up elaboration. Why?
lemma has_sum.neg (h : has_sum f a) : has_sum (λb, - f b) (- a) :=
by simpa only using h.map (-add_monoid_hom.id α) continuous_neg
lemma summable.neg (hf : summable f) : summable (λb, - f b) :=
hf.has_sum.neg.summable
lemma summable.of_neg (hf : summable (λb, - f b)) : summable f :=
by simpa only [neg_neg] using hf.neg
lemma summable_neg_iff : summable (λ b, - f b) ↔ summable f :=
⟨summable.of_neg, summable.neg⟩
lemma has_sum.sub (hf : has_sum f a₁) (hg : has_sum g a₂) : has_sum (λb, f b - g b) (a₁ - a₂) :=
by { simp only [sub_eq_add_neg], exact hf.add hg.neg }
lemma summable.sub (hf : summable f) (hg : summable g) : summable (λb, f b - g b) :=
(hf.has_sum.sub hg.has_sum).summable
lemma summable.trans_sub (hg : summable g) (hfg : summable (λb, f b - g b)) :
summable f :=
by simpa only [sub_add_cancel] using hfg.add hg
lemma summable_iff_of_summable_sub (hfg : summable (λb, f b - g b)) :
summable f ↔ summable g :=
⟨λ hf, hf.trans_sub $ by simpa only [neg_sub] using hfg.neg, λ hg, hg.trans_sub hfg⟩
lemma has_sum.update (hf : has_sum f a₁) (b : β) [decidable_eq β] (a : α) :
has_sum (update f b a) (a - f b + a₁) :=
begin
convert ((has_sum_ite_eq b _).add hf),
ext b',
by_cases h : b' = b,
{ rw [h, update_same],
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, if_true, sub_add_cancel] },
simp only [h, update_noteq, if_false, ne.def, zero_add, not_false_iff],
end
lemma summable.update (hf : summable f) (b : β) [decidable_eq β] (a : α) :
summable (update f b a) :=
(hf.has_sum.update b a).summable
lemma has_sum.has_sum_compl_iff {s : set β} (hf : has_sum (f ∘ coe : s → α) a₁) :
has_sum (f ∘ coe : sᶜ → α) a₂ ↔ has_sum f (a₁ + a₂) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, hf.add_compl h, λ h, _⟩,
rw [has_sum_subtype_iff_indicator] at hf ⊢,
rw [set.indicator_compl],
simpa only [add_sub_cancel'] using h.sub hf
end
lemma has_sum.has_sum_iff_compl {s : set β} (hf : has_sum (f ∘ coe : s → α) a₁) :
has_sum f a₂ ↔ has_sum (f ∘ coe : sᶜ → α) (a₂ - a₁) :=
iff.symm $ hf.has_sum_compl_iff.trans $ by rw [add_sub_cancel'_right]
lemma summable.summable_compl_iff {s : set β} (hf : summable (f ∘ coe : s → α)) :
summable (f ∘ coe : sᶜ → α) ↔ summable f :=
⟨λ ⟨a, ha⟩, (hf.has_sum.has_sum_compl_iff.1 ha).summable,
λ ⟨a, ha⟩, (hf.has_sum.has_sum_iff_compl.1 ha).summable⟩
protected lemma finset.has_sum_compl_iff (s : finset β) :
has_sum (λ x : {x // x ∉ s}, f x) a ↔ has_sum f (a + ∑ i in s, f i) :=
(s.has_sum f).has_sum_compl_iff.trans $ by rw [add_comm]
protected lemma finset.has_sum_iff_compl (s : finset β) :
has_sum f a ↔ has_sum (λ x : {x // x ∉ s}, f x) (a - ∑ i in s, f i) :=
(s.has_sum f).has_sum_iff_compl
protected lemma finset.summable_compl_iff (s : finset β) :
summable (λ x : {x // x ∉ s}, f x) ↔ summable f :=
(s.summable f).summable_compl_iff
lemma set.finite.summable_compl_iff {s : set β} (hs : s.finite) :
summable (f ∘ coe : sᶜ → α) ↔ summable f :=
(hs.summable f).summable_compl_iff
lemma has_sum_ite_eq_extract [decidable_eq β] (hf : has_sum f a) (b : β) :
has_sum (λ n, ite (n = b) 0 (f n)) (a - f b) :=
begin
convert hf.update b 0 using 1,
{ ext n, rw function.update_apply, },
{ rw [sub_add_eq_add_sub, zero_add], },
end
section tsum
variables [t2_space α]
lemma tsum_neg (hf : summable f) : ∑'b, - f b = - ∑'b, f b :=
hf.has_sum.neg.tsum_eq
lemma tsum_sub (hf : summable f) (hg : summable g) : ∑'b, (f b - g b) = ∑'b, f b - ∑'b, g b :=
(hf.has_sum.sub hg.has_sum).tsum_eq
lemma sum_add_tsum_compl {s : finset β} (hf : summable f) :
(∑ x in s, f x) + (∑' x : (↑s : set β)ᶜ, f x) = ∑' x, f x :=
((s.has_sum f).add_compl (s.summable_compl_iff.2 hf).has_sum).tsum_eq.symm
/-- Let `f : β → α` be a sequence with summable series and let `b ∈ β` be an index.
Lemma `tsum_ite_eq_extract` writes `Σ f n` as the sum of `f b` plus the series of the
remaining terms. -/
lemma tsum_ite_eq_extract [decidable_eq β] (hf : summable f) (b : β) :
∑' n, f n = f b + ∑' n, ite (n = b) 0 (f n) :=
begin
rw (has_sum_ite_eq_extract hf.has_sum b).tsum_eq,
exact (add_sub_cancel'_right _ _).symm,
end
end tsum
/-!
### Sums on subtypes
If `s` is a finset of `α`, we show that the summability of `f` in the whole space and on the subtype
`univ - s` are equivalent, and relate their sums. For a function defined on `ℕ`, we deduce the
formula `(∑ i in range k, f i) + (∑' i, f (i + k)) = (∑' i, f i)`, in `sum_add_tsum_nat_add`.
-/
section subtype
lemma has_sum_nat_add_iff {f : ℕ → α} (k : ℕ) {a : α} :
has_sum (λ n, f (n + k)) a ↔ has_sum f (a + ∑ i in range k, f i) :=
begin
refine iff.trans _ ((range k).has_sum_compl_iff),
rw [← (not_mem_range_equiv k).symm.has_sum_iff],
refl
end
lemma summable_nat_add_iff {f : ℕ → α} (k : ℕ) : summable (λ n, f (n + k)) ↔ summable f :=
iff.symm $ (equiv.add_right (∑ i in range k, f i)).summable_iff_of_has_sum_iff $
λ a, (has_sum_nat_add_iff k).symm
lemma has_sum_nat_add_iff' {f : ℕ → α} (k : ℕ) {a : α} :
has_sum (λ n, f (n + k)) (a - ∑ i in range k, f i) ↔ has_sum f a :=
by simp [has_sum_nat_add_iff]
lemma sum_add_tsum_nat_add [t2_space α] {f : ℕ → α} (k : ℕ) (h : summable f) :
(∑ i in range k, f i) + (∑' i, f (i + k)) = ∑' i, f i :=
by simpa only [add_comm] using
((has_sum_nat_add_iff k).1 ((summable_nat_add_iff k).2 h).has_sum).unique h.has_sum
lemma tsum_eq_zero_add [t2_space α] {f : ℕ → α} (hf : summable f) :
∑'b, f b = f 0 + ∑'b, f (b + 1) :=
by simpa only [sum_range_one] using (sum_add_tsum_nat_add 1 hf).symm
/-- For `f : ℕ → α`, then `∑' k, f (k + i)` tends to zero. This does not require a summability
assumption on `f`, as otherwise all sums are zero. -/
lemma tendsto_sum_nat_add [t2_space α] (f : ℕ → α) : tendsto (λ i, ∑' k, f (k + i)) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
begin
by_cases hf : summable f,
{ have h₀ : (λ i, (∑' i, f i) - ∑ j in range i, f j) = λ i, ∑' (k : ℕ), f (k + i),
{ ext1 i,
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add, add_comm, sum_add_tsum_nat_add i hf] },
have h₁ : tendsto (λ i : ℕ, ∑' i, f i) at_top (𝓝 (∑' i, f i)) := tendsto_const_nhds,
simpa only [h₀, sub_self] using tendsto.sub h₁ hf.has_sum.tendsto_sum_nat },
{ convert tendsto_const_nhds,
ext1 i,
rw ← summable_nat_add_iff i at hf,
{ exact tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable hf },
{ apply_instance } }
end
end subtype
end topological_group
section topological_ring
variables [semiring α] [topological_space α] [topological_ring α]
variables {f g : β → α} {a a₁ a₂ : α}
lemma has_sum.mul_left (a₂) (h : has_sum f a₁) : has_sum (λb, a₂ * f b) (a₂ * a₁) :=
by simpa only using h.map (add_monoid_hom.mul_left a₂) (continuous_const.mul continuous_id)
lemma has_sum.mul_right (a₂) (hf : has_sum f a₁) : has_sum (λb, f b * a₂) (a₁ * a₂) :=
by simpa only using hf.map (add_monoid_hom.mul_right a₂) (continuous_id.mul continuous_const)
lemma summable.mul_left (a) (hf : summable f) : summable (λb, a * f b) :=
(hf.has_sum.mul_left _).summable
lemma summable.mul_right (a) (hf : summable f) : summable (λb, f b * a) :=
(hf.has_sum.mul_right _).summable
section tsum
variables [t2_space α]
lemma summable.tsum_mul_left (a) (hf : summable f) : ∑'b, a * f b = a * ∑'b, f b :=
(hf.has_sum.mul_left _).tsum_eq
lemma summable.tsum_mul_right (a) (hf : summable f) : (∑'b, f b * a) = (∑'b, f b) * a :=
(hf.has_sum.mul_right _).tsum_eq
end tsum
end topological_ring
section const_smul
variables {R : Type*}
[monoid R] [topological_space R]
[topological_space α] [add_comm_monoid α]
[distrib_mul_action R α] [has_continuous_smul R α]
{f : β → α}
lemma has_sum.const_smul {a : α} {r : R} (hf : has_sum f a) : has_sum (λ z, r • f z) (r • a) :=
hf.map (distrib_mul_action.to_add_monoid_hom α r) (continuous_const.smul continuous_id)
lemma summable.const_smul {r : R} (hf : summable f) : summable (λ z, r • f z) :=
hf.has_sum.const_smul.summable
lemma tsum_const_smul [t2_space α] {r : R} (hf : summable f) : ∑' z, r • f z = r • ∑' z, f z :=
hf.has_sum.const_smul.tsum_eq
end const_smul
section smul_const
variables {R : Type*}
[semiring R] [topological_space R]
[topological_space α] [add_comm_monoid α]
[module R α] [has_continuous_smul R α]
{f : β → R}
lemma has_sum.smul_const {a : α} {r : R} (hf : has_sum f r) : has_sum (λ z, f z • a) (r • a) :=
hf.map ((smul_add_hom R α).flip a) (continuous_id.smul continuous_const)
lemma summable.smul_const {a : α} (hf : summable f) : summable (λ z, f z • a) :=
hf.has_sum.smul_const.summable
lemma tsum_smul_const [t2_space α] {a : α} (hf : summable f) : ∑' z, f z • a = (∑' z, f z) • a :=
hf.has_sum.smul_const.tsum_eq
end smul_const
section division_ring
variables [division_ring α] [topological_space α] [topological_ring α]
{f g : β → α} {a a₁ a₂ : α}
lemma has_sum.div_const (h : has_sum f a) (b : α) : has_sum (λ x, f x / b) (a / b) :=
by simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, h.mul_right b⁻¹]
lemma summable.div_const (h : summable f) (b : α) : summable (λ x, f x / b) :=
(h.has_sum.div_const b).summable
lemma has_sum_mul_left_iff (h : a₂ ≠ 0) : has_sum f a₁ ↔ has_sum (λb, a₂ * f b) (a₂ * a₁) :=
⟨has_sum.mul_left _, λ H, by simpa only [inv_mul_cancel_left₀ h] using H.mul_left a₂⁻¹⟩
lemma has_sum_mul_right_iff (h : a₂ ≠ 0) : has_sum f a₁ ↔ has_sum (λb, f b * a₂) (a₁ * a₂) :=
⟨has_sum.mul_right _, λ H, by simpa only [mul_inv_cancel_right₀ h] using H.mul_right a₂⁻¹⟩
lemma summable_mul_left_iff (h : a ≠ 0) : summable f ↔ summable (λb, a * f b) :=
⟨λ H, H.mul_left _, λ H, by simpa only [inv_mul_cancel_left₀ h] using H.mul_left a⁻¹⟩
lemma summable_mul_right_iff (h : a ≠ 0) : summable f ↔ summable (λb, f b * a) :=
⟨λ H, H.mul_right _, λ H, by simpa only [mul_inv_cancel_right₀ h] using H.mul_right a⁻¹⟩
lemma tsum_mul_left [t2_space α] : (∑' x, a * f x) = a * ∑' x, f x :=
if hf : summable f then hf.tsum_mul_left a
else if ha : a = 0 then by simp [ha]
else by rw [tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable hf,
tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable (mt (summable_mul_left_iff ha).2 hf), mul_zero]
lemma tsum_mul_right [t2_space α] : (∑' x, f x * a) = (∑' x, f x) * a :=
if hf : summable f then hf.tsum_mul_right a
else if ha : a = 0 then by simp [ha]
else by rw [tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable hf,
tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable (mt (summable_mul_right_iff ha).2 hf), zero_mul]
end division_ring
section order_topology
variables [ordered_add_comm_monoid α] [topological_space α] [order_closed_topology α]
variables {f g : β → α} {a a₁ a₂ : α}
lemma has_sum_le (h : ∀b, f b ≤ g b) (hf : has_sum f a₁) (hg : has_sum g a₂) : a₁ ≤ a₂ :=
le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto' hf hg $ assume s, sum_le_sum $ assume b _, h b
@[mono] lemma has_sum_mono (hf : has_sum f a₁) (hg : has_sum g a₂) (h : f ≤ g) : a₁ ≤ a₂ :=
has_sum_le h hf hg
lemma has_sum_le_of_sum_le (hf : has_sum f a) (h : ∀ s : finset β, ∑ b in s, f b ≤ a₂) :
a ≤ a₂ :=
le_of_tendsto' hf h
lemma le_has_sum_of_le_sum (hf : has_sum f a) (h : ∀ s : finset β, a₂ ≤ ∑ b in s, f b) :
a₂ ≤ a :=
ge_of_tendsto' hf h
lemma has_sum_le_inj {g : γ → α} (i : β → γ) (hi : injective i) (hs : ∀c∉set.range i, 0 ≤ g c)
(h : ∀b, f b ≤ g (i b)) (hf : has_sum f a₁) (hg : has_sum g a₂) : a₁ ≤ a₂ :=
have has_sum (λc, (partial_inv i c).cases_on' 0 f) a₁,
begin
refine (has_sum_iff_has_sum_of_ne_zero_bij (i ∘ coe) _ _ _).2 hf,
{ exact assume c₁ c₂ eq, hi eq },
{ intros c hc,
rw [mem_support] at hc,
cases eq : partial_inv i c with b; rw eq at hc,
{ contradiction },
{ rw [partial_inv_of_injective hi] at eq,
exact ⟨⟨b, hc⟩, eq⟩ } },
{ assume c, simp [partial_inv_left hi, option.cases_on'] }
end,
begin
refine has_sum_le (assume c, _) this hg,
by_cases c ∈ set.range i,
{ rcases h with ⟨b, rfl⟩,
rw [partial_inv_left hi, option.cases_on'],
exact h _ },
{ have : partial_inv i c = none := dif_neg h,
rw [this, option.cases_on'],
exact hs _ h }
end
lemma tsum_le_tsum_of_inj {g : γ → α} (i : β → γ) (hi : injective i) (hs : ∀c∉set.range i, 0 ≤ g c)
(h : ∀b, f b ≤ g (i b)) (hf : summable f) (hg : summable g) : tsum f ≤ tsum g :=
has_sum_le_inj i hi hs h hf.has_sum hg.has_sum
lemma sum_le_has_sum (s : finset β) (hs : ∀ b∉s, 0 ≤ f b) (hf : has_sum f a) :
∑ b in s, f b ≤ a :=
ge_of_tendsto hf (eventually_at_top.2 ⟨s, λ t hst,
sum_le_sum_of_subset_of_nonneg hst $ λ b hbt hbs, hs b hbs⟩)
lemma is_lub_has_sum (h : ∀ b, 0 ≤ f b) (hf : has_sum f a) :
is_lub (set.range (λ s : finset β, ∑ b in s, f b)) a :=
is_lub_of_tendsto_at_top (finset.sum_mono_set_of_nonneg h) hf
lemma le_has_sum (hf : has_sum f a) (b : β) (hb : ∀ b' ≠ b, 0 ≤ f b') : f b ≤ a :=
calc f b = ∑ b in {b}, f b : finset.sum_singleton.symm
... ≤ a : sum_le_has_sum _ (by { convert hb, simp }) hf
lemma sum_le_tsum {f : β → α} (s : finset β) (hs : ∀ b∉s, 0 ≤ f b) (hf : summable f) :
∑ b in s, f b ≤ ∑' b, f b :=
sum_le_has_sum s hs hf.has_sum
lemma le_tsum (hf : summable f) (b : β) (hb : ∀ b' ≠ b, 0 ≤ f b') : f b ≤ ∑' b, f b :=
le_has_sum (summable.has_sum hf) b hb
lemma tsum_le_tsum (h : ∀b, f b ≤ g b) (hf : summable f) (hg : summable g) : ∑'b, f b ≤ ∑'b, g b :=
has_sum_le h hf.has_sum hg.has_sum
@[mono] lemma tsum_mono (hf : summable f) (hg : summable g) (h : f ≤ g) :
∑' n, f n ≤ ∑' n, g n :=
tsum_le_tsum h hf hg
lemma tsum_le_of_sum_le (hf : summable f) (h : ∀ s : finset β, ∑ b in s, f b ≤ a₂) :
∑' b, f b ≤ a₂ :=
has_sum_le_of_sum_le hf.has_sum h
lemma tsum_le_of_sum_le' (ha₂ : 0 ≤ a₂) (h : ∀ s : finset β, ∑ b in s, f b ≤ a₂) :
∑' b, f b ≤ a₂ :=
begin
by_cases hf : summable f,
{ exact tsum_le_of_sum_le hf h },
{ rw tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable hf,
exact ha₂ }
end
lemma has_sum.nonneg (h : ∀ b, 0 ≤ g b) (ha : has_sum g a) : 0 ≤ a :=
has_sum_le h has_sum_zero ha
lemma has_sum.nonpos (h : ∀ b, g b ≤ 0) (ha : has_sum g a) : a ≤ 0 :=
has_sum_le h ha has_sum_zero
lemma tsum_nonneg (h : ∀ b, 0 ≤ g b) : 0 ≤ ∑'b, g b :=
begin
by_cases hg : summable g,
{ exact hg.has_sum.nonneg h },
{ simp [tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable hg] }
end
lemma tsum_nonpos (h : ∀ b, f b ≤ 0) : ∑'b, f b ≤ 0 :=
begin
by_cases hf : summable f,
{ exact hf.has_sum.nonpos h },
{ simp [tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable hf] }
end
end order_topology
section ordered_topological_group
variables [ordered_add_comm_group α] [topological_space α] [topological_add_group α]
[order_closed_topology α] {f g : β → α} {a₁ a₂ : α}
lemma has_sum_lt {i : β} (h : ∀ (b : β), f b ≤ g b) (hi : f i < g i)
(hf : has_sum f a₁) (hg : has_sum g a₂) :
a₁ < a₂ :=
have update f i 0 ≤ update g i 0 := update_le_update_iff.mpr ⟨rfl.le, λ i _, h i⟩,
have 0 - f i + a₁ ≤ 0 - g i + a₂ := has_sum_le this (hf.update i 0) (hg.update i 0),
by simpa only [zero_sub, add_neg_cancel_left] using add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le hi this
@[mono] lemma has_sum_strict_mono (hf : has_sum f a₁) (hg : has_sum g a₂) (h : f < g) : a₁ < a₂ :=
let ⟨hle, i, hi⟩ := pi.lt_def.mp h in has_sum_lt hle hi hf hg
lemma tsum_lt_tsum {i : β} (h : ∀ (b : β), f b ≤ g b) (hi : f i < g i)
(hf : summable f) (hg : summable g) :
∑' n, f n < ∑' n, g n :=
has_sum_lt h hi hf.has_sum hg.has_sum
@[mono] lemma tsum_strict_mono (hf : summable f) (hg : summable g) (h : f < g) :
∑' n, f n < ∑' n, g n :=
let ⟨hle, i, hi⟩ := pi.lt_def.mp h in tsum_lt_tsum hle hi hf hg
lemma tsum_pos (hsum : summable g) (hg : ∀ b, 0 ≤ g b) (i : β) (hi : 0 < g i) :
0 < ∑' b, g b :=
by { rw ← tsum_zero, exact tsum_lt_tsum hg hi summable_zero hsum }
lemma has_sum_zero_iff_of_nonneg (hf : ∀ i, 0 ≤ f i) : has_sum f 0 ↔ f = 0 :=
begin
split,
{ intros hf',
ext i,
by_contra hi',
have hi : 0 < f i := lt_of_le_of_ne (hf i) (ne.symm hi'),
simpa using has_sum_lt hf hi has_sum_zero hf' },
{ rintros rfl,
exact has_sum_zero },
end
end ordered_topological_group
section canonically_ordered
variables [canonically_ordered_add_monoid α] [topological_space α] [order_closed_topology α]
variables {f : β → α} {a : α}
lemma le_has_sum' (hf : has_sum f a) (b : β) : f b ≤ a :=
le_has_sum hf b $ λ _ _, zero_le _
lemma le_tsum' (hf : summable f) (b : β) : f b ≤ ∑' b, f b :=
le_tsum hf b $ λ _ _, zero_le _
lemma has_sum_zero_iff : has_sum f 0 ↔ ∀ x, f x = 0 :=
begin
refine ⟨_, λ h, _⟩,
{ contrapose!,
exact λ ⟨x, hx⟩ h, irrefl _ (lt_of_lt_of_le (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hx) (le_has_sum' h x)) },
{ convert has_sum_zero,
exact funext h }
end
lemma tsum_eq_zero_iff (hf : summable f) : ∑' i, f i = 0 ↔ ∀ x, f x = 0 :=
by rw [←has_sum_zero_iff, hf.has_sum_iff]
lemma tsum_ne_zero_iff (hf : summable f) : ∑' i, f i ≠ 0 ↔ ∃ x, f x ≠ 0 :=
by rw [ne.def, tsum_eq_zero_iff hf, not_forall]
lemma is_lub_has_sum' (hf : has_sum f a) : is_lub (set.range (λ s : finset β, ∑ b in s, f b)) a :=
is_lub_of_tendsto_at_top (finset.sum_mono_set f) hf
end canonically_ordered
section uniform_group
variables [add_comm_group α] [uniform_space α]
lemma summable_iff_cauchy_seq_finset [complete_space α] {f : β → α} :
summable f ↔ cauchy_seq (λ (s : finset β), ∑ b in s, f b) :=
cauchy_map_iff_exists_tendsto.symm
variables [uniform_add_group α] {f g : β → α} {a a₁ a₂ : α}
lemma cauchy_seq_finset_iff_vanishing :
cauchy_seq (λ (s : finset β), ∑ b in s, f b)
↔ ∀ e ∈ 𝓝 (0:α), (∃s:finset β, ∀t, disjoint t s → ∑ b in t, f b ∈ e) :=
begin
simp only [cauchy_seq, cauchy_map_iff, and_iff_right at_top_ne_bot,
prod_at_top_at_top_eq, uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero α, tendsto_comap_iff, (∘)],
rw [tendsto_at_top'],
split,
{ assume h e he,
rcases h e he with ⟨⟨s₁, s₂⟩, h⟩,
use [s₁ ∪ s₂],
assume t ht,
specialize h (s₁ ∪ s₂, (s₁ ∪ s₂) ∪ t) ⟨le_sup_left, le_sup_of_le_left le_sup_right⟩,
simpa only [finset.sum_union ht.symm, add_sub_cancel'] using h },
{ assume h e he,
rcases exists_nhds_half_neg he with ⟨d, hd, hde⟩,
rcases h d hd with ⟨s, h⟩,
use [(s, s)],
rintros ⟨t₁, t₂⟩ ⟨ht₁, ht₂⟩,
have : ∑ b in t₂, f b - ∑ b in t₁, f b = ∑ b in t₂ \ s, f b - ∑ b in t₁ \ s, f b,
{ simp only [(finset.sum_sdiff ht₁).symm, (finset.sum_sdiff ht₂).symm,
add_sub_add_right_eq_sub] },
simp only [this],
exact hde _ (h _ finset.sdiff_disjoint) _ (h _ finset.sdiff_disjoint) }
end
local attribute [instance] topological_add_group.regular_space
/-- The sum over the complement of a finset tends to `0` when the finset grows to cover the whole
space. This does not need a summability assumption, as otherwise all sums are zero. -/
lemma tendsto_tsum_compl_at_top_zero [t1_space α] (f : β → α) :
tendsto (λ (s : finset β), ∑' b : {x // x ∉ s}, f b) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
begin
by_cases H : summable f,
{ assume e he,
rcases nhds_is_closed he with ⟨o, ho, oe, o_closed⟩,
simp only [le_eq_subset, set.mem_preimage, mem_at_top_sets, filter.mem_map, ge_iff_le],
obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ : ∃ (s : finset β), ∀ (t : finset β), disjoint t s → ∑ (b : β) in t, f b ∈ o :=
cauchy_seq_finset_iff_vanishing.1 (tendsto.cauchy_seq H.has_sum) o ho,
refine ⟨s, λ a sa, oe _⟩,
have A : summable (λ b : {x // x ∉ a}, f b) := a.summable_compl_iff.2 H,
apply is_closed.mem_of_tendsto o_closed A.has_sum (eventually_of_forall (λ b, _)),
have : disjoint (finset.image (λ (i : {x // x ∉ a}), (i : β)) b) s,
{ apply disjoint_left.2 (λ i hi his, _),
rcases mem_image.1 hi with ⟨i', hi', rfl⟩,
exact i'.2 (sa his), },
convert hs _ this using 1,
rw sum_image,
assume i hi j hj hij,
exact subtype.ext hij },
{ convert tendsto_const_nhds,
ext s,
apply tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable,
rwa finset.summable_compl_iff }
end
variable [complete_space α]
lemma summable_iff_vanishing :
summable f ↔ ∀ e ∈ 𝓝 (0:α), (∃s:finset β, ∀t, disjoint t s → ∑ b in t, f b ∈ e) :=
by rw [summable_iff_cauchy_seq_finset, cauchy_seq_finset_iff_vanishing]
/- TODO: generalize to monoid with a uniform continuous subtraction operator: `(a + b) - b = a` -/
lemma summable.summable_of_eq_zero_or_self (hf : summable f) (h : ∀b, g b = 0 ∨ g b = f b) :
summable g :=
summable_iff_vanishing.2 $
assume e he,
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := summable_iff_vanishing.1 hf e he in
⟨s, assume t ht,
have eq : ∑ b in t.filter (λb, g b = f b), f b = ∑ b in t, g b :=
calc ∑ b in t.filter (λb, g b = f b), f b = ∑ b in t.filter (λb, g b = f b), g b :
finset.sum_congr rfl (assume b hb, (finset.mem_filter.1 hb).2.symm)
... = ∑ b in t, g b :
begin
refine finset.sum_subset (finset.filter_subset _ _) _,
assume b hbt hb,
simp only [(∉), finset.mem_filter, and_iff_right hbt] at hb,
exact (h b).resolve_right hb
end,
eq ▸ hs _ $ finset.disjoint_of_subset_left (finset.filter_subset _ _) ht⟩
protected lemma summable.indicator (hf : summable f) (s : set β) :
summable (s.indicator f) :=
hf.summable_of_eq_zero_or_self $ set.indicator_eq_zero_or_self _ _
lemma summable.comp_injective {i : γ → β} (hf : summable f) (hi : injective i) :
summable (f ∘ i) :=
begin
simpa only [set.indicator_range_comp]
using (hi.summable_iff _).2 (hf.indicator (set.range i)),
exact λ x hx, set.indicator_of_not_mem hx _
end
lemma summable.subtype (hf : summable f) (s : set β) : summable (f ∘ coe : s → α) :=
hf.comp_injective subtype.coe_injective
lemma summable_subtype_and_compl {s : set β} :
summable (λ x : s, f x) ∧ summable (λ x : sᶜ, f x) ↔ summable f :=
⟨and_imp.2 summable.add_compl, λ h, ⟨h.subtype s, h.subtype sᶜ⟩⟩
lemma summable.sigma_factor {γ : β → Type*} {f : (Σb:β, γ b) → α}
(ha : summable f) (b : β) : summable (λc, f ⟨b, c⟩) :=
ha.comp_injective sigma_mk_injective
lemma summable.sigma [t1_space α] {γ : β → Type*} {f : (Σb:β, γ b) → α}
(ha : summable f) : summable (λb, ∑'c, f ⟨b, c⟩) :=
ha.sigma' (λ b, ha.sigma_factor b)
lemma summable.prod_factor {f : β × γ → α} (h : summable f) (b : β) :
summable (λ c, f (b, c)) :=
h.comp_injective $ λ c₁ c₂ h, (prod.ext_iff.1 h).2
lemma tsum_sigma [t1_space α] {γ : β → Type*} {f : (Σb:β, γ b) → α}
(ha : summable f) : ∑'p, f p = ∑'b c, f ⟨b, c⟩ :=
tsum_sigma' (λ b, ha.sigma_factor b) ha
lemma tsum_prod [t1_space α] {f : β × γ → α} (h : summable f) :
∑'p, f p = ∑'b c, f ⟨b, c⟩ :=
tsum_prod' h h.prod_factor
lemma tsum_comm [t1_space α] {f : β → γ → α} (h : summable (function.uncurry f)) :
∑' c b, f b c = ∑' b c, f b c :=
tsum_comm' h h.prod_factor h.prod_symm.prod_factor
end uniform_group
section topological_group
variables {G : Type*} [topological_space G] [add_comm_group G] [topological_add_group G]
{f : α → G}
lemma summable.vanishing (hf : summable f) ⦃e : set G⦄ (he : e ∈ 𝓝 (0 : G)) :
∃ s : finset α, ∀ t, disjoint t s → ∑ k in t, f k ∈ e :=
begin
letI : uniform_space G := topological_add_group.to_uniform_space G,
letI : uniform_add_group G := topological_add_group_is_uniform,
rcases hf with ⟨y, hy⟩,
exact cauchy_seq_finset_iff_vanishing.1 hy.cauchy_seq e he
end
/-- Series divergence test: if `f` is a convergent series, then `f x` tends to zero along
`cofinite`. -/
lemma summable.tendsto_cofinite_zero (hf : summable f) : tendsto f cofinite (𝓝 0) :=
begin
intros e he,
rw [filter.mem_map],
rcases hf.vanishing he with ⟨s, hs⟩,
refine s.eventually_cofinite_nmem.mono (λ x hx, _),
by simpa using hs {x} (disjoint_singleton_left.2 hx)
end
lemma summable.tendsto_at_top_zero {f : ℕ → G} (hf : summable f) : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 0) :=
by { rw ←nat.cofinite_eq_at_top, exact hf.tendsto_cofinite_zero }
lemma summable.tendsto_top_of_pos {α : Type*}
[linear_ordered_field α] [topological_space α] [order_topology α] {f : ℕ → α}
(hf : summable f⁻¹) (hf' : ∀ n, 0 < f n) : tendsto f at_top at_top :=
begin
rw [show f = f⁻¹⁻¹, by { ext, simp }],
apply filter.tendsto.inv_tendsto_zero,
apply tendsto_nhds_within_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within _
(summable.tendsto_at_top_zero hf),
rw eventually_iff_exists_mem,
refine ⟨set.Ioi 0, Ioi_mem_at_top _, λ _ _, _⟩,
rw [set.mem_Ioi, inv_eq_one_div, one_div, pi.inv_apply, _root_.inv_pos],
exact hf' _,
end
end topological_group
section linear_order
/-! For infinite sums taking values in a linearly ordered monoid, the existence of a least upper
bound for the finite sums is a criterion for summability.
This criterion is useful when applied in a linearly ordered monoid which is also a complete or
conditionally complete linear order, such as `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0`, `ℝ≥0∞`, because it is then easy to check
the existence of a least upper bound.
-/
lemma has_sum_of_is_lub_of_nonneg [linear_ordered_add_comm_monoid β] [topological_space β]
[order_topology β] {f : α → β} (b : β) (h : ∀ b, 0 ≤ f b)
(hf : is_lub (set.range (λ s, ∑ a in s, f a)) b) :
has_sum f b :=
tendsto_at_top_is_lub (finset.sum_mono_set_of_nonneg h) hf
lemma has_sum_of_is_lub [canonically_linear_ordered_add_monoid β] [topological_space β]
[order_topology β] {f : α → β} (b : β) (hf : is_lub (set.range (λ s, ∑ a in s, f a)) b) :
has_sum f b :=
tendsto_at_top_is_lub (finset.sum_mono_set f) hf
lemma summable_abs_iff [linear_ordered_add_comm_group β] [uniform_space β]
[uniform_add_group β] [complete_space β] {f : α → β} :
summable (λ x, |f x|) ↔ summable f :=
have h1 : ∀ x : {x | 0 ≤ f x}, |f x| = f x := λ x, abs_of_nonneg x.2,
have h2 : ∀ x : {x | 0 ≤ f x}ᶜ, |f x| = -f x := λ x, abs_of_neg (not_le.1 x.2),
calc summable (λ x, |f x|) ↔
summable (λ x : {x | 0 ≤ f x}, |f x|) ∧ summable (λ x : {x | 0 ≤ f x}ᶜ, |f x|) :
summable_subtype_and_compl.symm
... ↔ summable (λ x : {x | 0 ≤ f x}, f x) ∧ summable (λ x : {x | 0 ≤ f x}ᶜ, -f x) :
by simp only [h1, h2]
... ↔ _ : by simp only [summable_neg_iff, summable_subtype_and_compl]
alias summable_abs_iff ↔ summable.of_abs summable.abs
lemma finite_of_summable_const [linear_ordered_add_comm_group β] [archimedean β]
[topological_space β] [order_closed_topology β] {b : β} (hb : 0 < b)
(hf : summable (λ a : α, b)) :
set.finite (set.univ : set α) :=
begin
have H : ∀ s : finset α, s.card • b ≤ ∑' a : α, b,
{ intros s,
simpa using sum_le_has_sum s (λ a ha, hb.le) hf.has_sum },
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := archimedean.arch (∑' a : α, b) hb,
have : ∀ s : finset α, s.card ≤ n,
{ intros s,
simpa [nsmul_le_nsmul_iff hb] using (H s).trans hn },
haveI : fintype α := fintype_of_finset_card_le n this,
exact set.finite_univ
end
end linear_order
section cauchy_seq
open filter
/-- If the extended distance between consecutive points of a sequence is estimated
by a summable series of `nnreal`s, then the original sequence is a Cauchy sequence. -/
lemma cauchy_seq_of_edist_le_of_summable [pseudo_emetric_space α] {f : ℕ → α} (d : ℕ → ℝ≥0)
(hf : ∀ n, edist (f n) (f n.succ) ≤ d n) (hd : summable d) : cauchy_seq f :=
begin
refine emetric.cauchy_seq_iff_nnreal.2 (λ ε εpos, _),
-- Actually we need partial sums of `d` to be a Cauchy sequence
replace hd : cauchy_seq (λ (n : ℕ), ∑ x in range n, d x) :=
let ⟨_, H⟩ := hd in H.tendsto_sum_nat.cauchy_seq,
-- Now we take the same `N` as in one of the definitions of a Cauchy sequence
refine (metric.cauchy_seq_iff'.1 hd ε (nnreal.coe_pos.2 εpos)).imp (λ N hN n hn, _),
have hsum := hN n hn,
-- We simplify the known inequality
rw [dist_nndist, nnreal.nndist_eq, ← sum_range_add_sum_Ico _ hn, add_tsub_cancel_left] at hsum,
norm_cast at hsum,
replace hsum := lt_of_le_of_lt (le_max_left _ _) hsum,
rw edist_comm,
-- Then use `hf` to simplify the goal to the same form
apply lt_of_le_of_lt (edist_le_Ico_sum_of_edist_le hn (λ k _ _, hf k)),
assumption_mod_cast
end
/-- If the distance between consecutive points of a sequence is estimated by a summable series,
then the original sequence is a Cauchy sequence. -/
lemma cauchy_seq_of_dist_le_of_summable [pseudo_metric_space α] {f : ℕ → α} (d : ℕ → ℝ)
(hf : ∀ n, dist (f n) (f n.succ) ≤ d n) (hd : summable d) : cauchy_seq f :=
begin
refine metric.cauchy_seq_iff'.2 (λε εpos, _),
replace hd : cauchy_seq (λ (n : ℕ), ∑ x in range n, d x) :=
let ⟨_, H⟩ := hd in H.tendsto_sum_nat.cauchy_seq,
refine (metric.cauchy_seq_iff'.1 hd ε εpos).imp (λ N hN n hn, _),
have hsum := hN n hn,
rw [real.dist_eq, ← sum_Ico_eq_sub _ hn] at hsum,
calc dist (f n) (f N) = dist (f N) (f n) : dist_comm _ _
... ≤ ∑ x in Ico N n, d x : dist_le_Ico_sum_of_dist_le hn (λ k _ _, hf k)
... ≤ |∑ x in Ico N n, d x| : le_abs_self _
... < ε : hsum
end
lemma cauchy_seq_of_summable_dist [pseudo_metric_space α] {f : ℕ → α}
(h : summable (λn, dist (f n) (f n.succ))) : cauchy_seq f :=
cauchy_seq_of_dist_le_of_summable _ (λ _, le_rfl) h
lemma dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto [pseudo_metric_space α] {f : ℕ → α} (d : ℕ → ℝ)
(hf : ∀ n, dist (f n) (f n.succ) ≤ d n) (hd : summable d) {a : α} (ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a))
(n : ℕ) :
dist (f n) a ≤ ∑' m, d (n + m) :=
begin
refine le_of_tendsto (tendsto_const_nhds.dist ha)
(eventually_at_top.2 ⟨n, λ m hnm, _⟩),
refine le_trans (dist_le_Ico_sum_of_dist_le hnm (λ k _ _, hf k)) _,
rw [sum_Ico_eq_sum_range],
refine sum_le_tsum (range _) (λ _ _, le_trans dist_nonneg (hf _)) _,
exact hd.comp_injective (add_right_injective n)
end
lemma dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto₀ [pseudo_metric_space α] {f : ℕ → α} (d : ℕ → ℝ)
(hf : ∀ n, dist (f n) (f n.succ) ≤ d n) (hd : summable d) {a : α} (ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a)) :
dist (f 0) a ≤ tsum d :=
by simpa only [zero_add] using dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto d hf hd ha 0
lemma dist_le_tsum_dist_of_tendsto [pseudo_metric_space α] {f : ℕ → α}
(h : summable (λn, dist (f n) (f n.succ))) {a : α} (ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a)) (n) :
dist (f n) a ≤ ∑' m, dist (f (n+m)) (f (n+m).succ) :=
show dist (f n) a ≤ ∑' m, (λx, dist (f x) (f x.succ)) (n + m), from
dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto (λ n, dist (f n) (f n.succ)) (λ _, le_rfl) h ha n
lemma dist_le_tsum_dist_of_tendsto₀ [pseudo_metric_space α] {f : ℕ → α}
(h : summable (λn, dist (f n) (f n.succ))) {a : α} (ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a)) :
dist (f 0) a ≤ ∑' n, dist (f n) (f n.succ) :=
by simpa only [zero_add] using dist_le_tsum_dist_of_tendsto h ha 0
end cauchy_seq
/-! ## Multipliying two infinite sums
In this section, we prove various results about `(∑' x : β, f x) * (∑' y : γ, g y)`. Note that we
always assume that the family `λ x : β × γ, f x.1 * g x.2` is summable, since there is no way to
deduce this from the summmabilities of `f` and `g` in general, but if you are working in a normed
space, you may want to use the analogous lemmas in `analysis/normed_space/basic`
(e.g `tsum_mul_tsum_of_summable_norm`).
We first establish results about arbitrary index types, `β` and `γ`, and then we specialize to
`β = γ = ℕ` to prove the Cauchy product formula (see `tsum_mul_tsum_eq_tsum_sum_antidiagonal`).
### Arbitrary index types
-/
section tsum_mul_tsum
variables [topological_space α] [regular_space α] [semiring α] [topological_ring α]
{f : β → α} {g : γ → α} {s t u : α}
lemma has_sum.mul_eq (hf : has_sum f s) (hg : has_sum g t)
(hfg : has_sum (λ (x : β × γ), f x.1 * g x.2) u) :
s * t = u :=
have key₁ : has_sum (λ b, f b * t) (s * t),
from hf.mul_right t,
have this : ∀ b : β, has_sum (λ c : γ, f b * g c) (f b * t),
from λ b, hg.mul_left (f b),
have key₂ : has_sum (λ b, f b * t) u,
from has_sum.prod_fiberwise hfg this,
key₁.unique key₂
lemma has_sum.mul (hf : has_sum f s) (hg : has_sum g t)
(hfg : summable (λ (x : β × γ), f x.1 * g x.2)) :
has_sum (λ (x : β × γ), f x.1 * g x.2) (s * t) :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := hfg in
(hf.mul_eq hg hu).symm ▸ hu
/-- Product of two infinites sums indexed by arbitrary types.
See also `tsum_mul_tsum_of_summable_norm` if `f` and `g` are abolutely summable. -/
lemma tsum_mul_tsum (hf : summable f) (hg : summable g)
(hfg : summable (λ (x : β × γ), f x.1 * g x.2)) :
(∑' x, f x) * (∑' y, g y) = (∑' z : β × γ, f z.1 * g z.2) :=
hf.has_sum.mul_eq hg.has_sum hfg.has_sum
end tsum_mul_tsum
section cauchy_product
/-! ### `ℕ`-indexed families (Cauchy product)
We prove two versions of the Cauchy product formula. The first one is
`tsum_mul_tsum_eq_tsum_sum_range`, where the `n`-th term is a sum over `finset.range (n+1)`
involving `nat` substraction.
In order to avoid `nat` substraction, we also provide `tsum_mul_tsum_eq_tsum_sum_antidiagonal`,
where the `n`-th term is a sum over all pairs `(k, l)` such that `k+l=n`, which corresponds to the
`finset` `finset.nat.antidiagonal n` -/
variables {f : ℕ → α} {g : ℕ → α}
open finset
variables [topological_space α] [semiring α]
/- The family `(k, l) : ℕ × ℕ ↦ f k * g l` is summable if and only if the family
`(n, k, l) : Σ (n : ℕ), nat.antidiagonal n ↦ f k * g l` is summable. -/
lemma summable_mul_prod_iff_summable_mul_sigma_antidiagonal {f g : ℕ → α} :
summable (λ x : ℕ × ℕ, f x.1 * g x.2) ↔
summable (λ x : (Σ (n : ℕ), nat.antidiagonal n), f (x.2 : ℕ × ℕ).1 * g (x.2 : ℕ × ℕ).2) :=
nat.sigma_antidiagonal_equiv_prod.summable_iff.symm
variables [regular_space α] [topological_ring α]
lemma summable_sum_mul_antidiagonal_of_summable_mul {f g : ℕ → α}
(h : summable (λ x : ℕ × ℕ, f x.1 * g x.2)) :
summable (λ n, ∑ kl in nat.antidiagonal n, f kl.1 * g kl.2) :=
begin
rw summable_mul_prod_iff_summable_mul_sigma_antidiagonal at h,
conv {congr, funext, rw [← finset.sum_finset_coe, ← tsum_fintype]},
exact h.sigma' (λ n, (has_sum_fintype _).summable),
end
/-- The Cauchy product formula for the product of two infinites sums indexed by `ℕ`,
expressed by summing on `finset.nat.antidiagonal`.
See also `tsum_mul_tsum_eq_tsum_sum_antidiagonal_of_summable_norm`
if `f` and `g` are absolutely summable. -/
lemma tsum_mul_tsum_eq_tsum_sum_antidiagonal (hf : summable f) (hg : summable g)
(hfg : summable (λ (x : ℕ × ℕ), f x.1 * g x.2)) :
(∑' n, f n) * (∑' n, g n) = (∑' n, ∑ kl in nat.antidiagonal n, f kl.1 * g kl.2) :=
begin
conv_rhs {congr, funext, rw [← finset.sum_finset_coe, ← tsum_fintype]},
rw [tsum_mul_tsum hf hg hfg, ← nat.sigma_antidiagonal_equiv_prod.tsum_eq (_ : ℕ × ℕ → α)],
exact tsum_sigma' (λ n, (has_sum_fintype _).summable)
(summable_mul_prod_iff_summable_mul_sigma_antidiagonal.mp hfg)
end
lemma summable_sum_mul_range_of_summable_mul {f g : ℕ → α}
(h : summable (λ x : ℕ × ℕ, f x.1 * g x.2)) :
summable (λ n, ∑ k in range (n+1), f k * g (n - k)) :=
begin
simp_rw ← nat.sum_antidiagonal_eq_sum_range_succ (λ k l, f k * g l),
exact summable_sum_mul_antidiagonal_of_summable_mul h
end
/-- The Cauchy product formula for the product of two infinites sums indexed by `ℕ`,
expressed by summing on `finset.range`.
See also `tsum_mul_tsum_eq_tsum_sum_range_of_summable_norm`
if `f` and `g` are absolutely summable. -/
lemma tsum_mul_tsum_eq_tsum_sum_range (hf : summable f) (hg : summable g)
(hfg : summable (λ (x : ℕ × ℕ), f x.1 * g x.2)) :
(∑' n, f n) * (∑' n, g n) = (∑' n, ∑ k in range (n+1), f k * g (n - k)) :=
begin
simp_rw ← nat.sum_antidiagonal_eq_sum_range_succ (λ k l, f k * g l),
exact tsum_mul_tsum_eq_tsum_sum_antidiagonal hf hg hfg
end
end cauchy_product
|
afa00f818cb949e4e0cf1446bbf518a68c0a013f | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /archive/imo/imo2005_q4.lean | ac90ef53f0bccddf599648f2d2106895e1b08d02 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,607 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth
-/
import field_theory.finite.basic
/-!
# IMO 2005 Q4
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
Problem: Determine all positive integers relatively prime to all the terms of the infinite sequence
`a n = 2 ^ n + 3 ^ n + 6 ^ n - 1`, for `n ≥ 1`.
This is quite an easy problem, in which the key point is a modular arithmetic calculation with
the sequence `a n` relative to an arbitrary prime.
-/
namespace imo2005_q4
/-- The sequence considered in the problem, `2 ^ n + 3 ^ n + 6 ^ n - 1`. -/
def a (n : ℕ) : ℤ := 2 ^ n + 3 ^ n + 6 ^ n - 1
/-- Key lemma (a modular arithmetic calculation): Given a prime `p` other than `2` or `3`, the
`p - 2`th term of the sequence has `p` as a factor. -/
lemma find_specified_factor {p : ℕ} (hp : nat.prime p) (hp' : is_coprime (6:ℤ) p) :
↑p ∣ a (p - 2) :=
begin
rw [← int.modeq_zero_iff_dvd],
-- Since `p` and `6` are coprime, `6` has an inverse mod `p`
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ : ∃ (b : ℤ), 6 * b ≡ 1 [ZMOD p],
{ refine int.mod_coprime _,
exact nat.is_coprime_iff_coprime.mp hp' },
-- Also since `p` is coprime to `6`, it's coprime to `2` and `3`
have hp₂ : is_coprime (2:ℤ) p := (id hp' : is_coprime (3 * 2 : ℤ) p).of_mul_left_right,
have hp₃ : is_coprime (3:ℤ) p := (id hp' : is_coprime (2 * 3 : ℤ) p).of_mul_left_right,
-- Slightly painful nat-subtraction calculation
have hp_sub_one : p - 1 = (p - 2) + 1,
{ have : 1 ≤ p - 1 := le_tsub_of_add_le_right hp.two_le,
conv_lhs { rw ← nat.sub_add_cancel this },
refl },
-- Main calculation: `6 * a (p - 2)` is a multiple of `p`
have H : (6:ℤ) * a (p - 2) ≡ 0 [ZMOD p],
calc (6:ℤ) * a (p - 2)
= 3 * 2 ^ (p - 1) + 2 * 3 ^ (p - 1) + 6 ^ (p - 1) - 6 :
by { simp only [a, mul_add, mul_sub, hp_sub_one, pow_succ], ring, }
... ≡ 3 * 1 + 2 * 1 + 1 - 6 [ZMOD p] : -- At this step we use Fermat's little theorem
by { apply_rules [int.modeq.sub_right, int.modeq.add, int.modeq.mul_left,
int.modeq.pow_card_sub_one_eq_one hp] }
... = 0 : by norm_num,
-- Since `6` has an inverse mod `p`, `a (p - 2)` itself is a multiple of `p`
calc (a (p - 2) : ℤ) = 1 * a (p - 2) : by ring
... ≡ (6 * b) * a (p - 2) [ZMOD p] : int.modeq.mul_right _ hb.symm
... = b * (6 * a (p - 2)) : by ring
... ≡ b * 0 [ZMOD p] : int.modeq.mul_left _ H
... = 0 : by ring,
end
end imo2005_q4
open imo2005_q4
/-- Main statement: The only positive integer coprime to all terms of the sequence `a` is `1`. -/
theorem imo2005_q4 {k : ℕ} (hk : 0 < k) : (∀ n : ℕ, 1 ≤ n → is_coprime (a n) k) ↔ k = 1 :=
begin
split, rotate,
{ -- The property is clearly true for `k = 1`
rintros rfl n hn,
exact is_coprime_one_right },
intros h,
-- Conversely, suppose `k` is a number with the property, and let `p` be `k.min_fac` (by
-- definition this is the minimal prime factor of `k` if `k ≠ 1`, and otherwise `1`.
let p := k.min_fac,
-- Testing the special property of `k` for `48`, the second term of the sequence, we see that `p`
-- is coprime to `6`.
have hp₆ : is_coprime (6:ℤ) p,
{ refine is_coprime.of_coprime_of_dvd_right _ (int.coe_nat_dvd.mpr k.min_fac_dvd),
exact (id (h 2 one_le_two) : is_coprime (8 * 6 : ℤ) k).of_mul_left_right, },
-- In particular `p` is coprime to `2` (we record the `nat.coprime` version since that's what's
-- needed later).
have hp₂ : nat.coprime 2 p,
{ rw ← nat.is_coprime_iff_coprime,
exact (id hp₆ : is_coprime (3 * 2 : ℤ) p).of_mul_left_right },
-- Suppose for the sake of contradiction that `k ≠ 1`. Then `p` is genuinely a prime factor of
-- `k`.
by_contra hk',
have hp : nat.prime p := nat.min_fac_prime hk',
-- So `3 ≤ p`
have hp₃ : 3 ≤ p,
{ have : 2 ≠ p := by rwa nat.coprime_primes nat.prime_two hp at hp₂,
apply nat.lt_of_le_and_ne hp.two_le this, },
-- Testing the special property of `k` for the `p - 2`th term of the sequence, we see that `p` is
-- coprime to `a (p - 2)`.
have : is_coprime ↑p (a (p - 2)),
{ refine ((h (p - 2) _).of_coprime_of_dvd_right (int.coe_nat_dvd.mpr k.min_fac_dvd)).symm,
exact le_tsub_of_add_le_right hp₃ },
rw (nat.prime_iff_prime_int.mp hp).coprime_iff_not_dvd at this,
-- But also, by our previous lemma, `p` divides `a (p - 2)`.
have : ↑p ∣ a (p - 2) := find_specified_factor hp hp₆,
-- Contradiction!
contradiction,
end
|
4f1295b953de64c884c3fbaee97c6ab75d14acb9 | 48eee836fdb5c613d9a20741c17db44c8e12e61c | /src/universal/product.lean | 24d66f33d750e8cb1bea70b4a581c163b773f2d3 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | fgdorais/lean-universal | 06430443a4abe51e303e602684c2977d1f5c0834 | 9259b0f7fb3aa83a9e0a7a3eaa44c262e42cc9b1 | refs/heads/master | 1,592,479,744,136 | 1,589,473,399,000 | 1,589,473,399,000 | 196,287,552 | 1 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,098 | lean | -- Copyright © 2019 François G. Dorais. All rights reserved.
-- Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
import .basic
import .homomorphism
import .identity
namespace universal
variables {τ : Type} {σ : Type*} (sig : signature τ σ)
namespace algebra
section pi
variables {sig} {ι : Type*} (alg : ι → algebra sig)
definition pi : algebra sig :=
{ sort := λ t, Π j, (alg j).sort t
, func := λ f xs j, (alg j).func f (λ i, xs i j)
}
@[simp] theorem pi_func (f) (xs) (j) : (pi alg).func f xs j = (alg j).func f (λ i, xs i j) := rfl
definition pi_proj (j) : homomorphism (pi alg) (alg j) :=
{ map := λ _ x, x j
, func := λ _ _, rfl
}
theorem pi_eval {dom} : ∀ {cod} (t : term sig dom cod) (xs) (j),
(pi alg).eval t xs j = (alg j).eval t (λ i, xs i j)
| _ (term.proj _) _ _ := rfl
| _ (term.func f ts) xs j :=
have (λ i, (pi alg).eval (ts i) xs j) = (λ i, (alg j).eval (ts i) (λ i, xs i j)),
from funext $ λ i, pi_eval (ts i) xs j,
calc _
= (alg j).func f (λ i, (pi alg).eval (ts i) xs j) : rfl ...
= (alg j).func f (λ i, (alg j).eval (ts i) (λ i, xs i j)) : by rw this ...
= (alg j).eval (term.func f ts) (λ i, xs i j) : by reflexivity
theorem pi_satisfies (e : identity sig) : (∀ i, (alg i).satisfies e) → (pi alg).satisfies e :=
begin
intros H val,
funext,
rw pi_eval,
rw pi_eval,
apply H,
end
section universal_property
variables {alg} {alg₀ : algebra sig} (h : Π j, homomorphism alg₀ (alg j))
definition pi_hom : homomorphism alg₀ (pi alg) :=
{ map := λ t x j, (h j).map t x
, func := λ _ _, funext $ λ j, by simp [(h j).func]
}
@[simp] theorem pi_hom_proj (j) : (pi_proj alg j).comp (pi_hom h) = h j := homomorphism.ext $ λ _ _, rfl
theorem pi_univ (h₀ : homomorphism alg₀ (pi alg)) :
(∀ j, (pi_proj alg j).comp h₀ = h j) → h₀ = pi_hom h :=
λ H, homomorphism.ext $ λ t x, funext $ λ j,
begin
transitivity ((pi_proj alg j).comp h₀).map t x,
reflexivity,
rw H,
reflexivity,
end
end universal_property
end pi
section prod
variables {sig} (alg₁ : algebra sig) (alg₂ : algebra sig)
definition prod : algebra sig :=
{ sort := λ t, alg₁.sort t × alg₂.sort t
, func := λ f xs, (alg₁.func f (λ i, (xs i).fst), alg₂.func f (λ i, (xs i).snd))
}
@[simp] theorem prod_func (f) (xs) : (prod alg₁ alg₂).func f xs = (alg₁.func f (λ i, (xs i).fst), alg₂.func f (λ i, (xs i).snd)) := rfl
definition prod_fst : homomorphism (prod alg₁ alg₂) alg₁ :=
{ map := λ _, prod.fst
, func := λ _ _, rfl
}
definition prod_snd : homomorphism (prod alg₁ alg₂) alg₂ :=
{ map := λ _, prod.snd
, func := λ _ _, rfl
}
theorem prod_eval {dom} : ∀ {cod} (t : term sig dom cod) (xs),
(prod alg₁ alg₂).eval t xs = (alg₁.eval t (λ i, (xs i).fst), alg₂.eval t (λ i, (xs i).snd))
| _ (term.proj _) _ := prod.eq rfl rfl
| _ (term.func f ts) xs :=
have (λ i, (prod alg₁ alg₂).eval (ts i) xs) = (λ i,
(alg₁.eval (ts i) (λ i, (xs i).fst),
alg₂.eval (ts i) (λ i, (xs i).snd))),
from funext $ λ i, prod_eval (ts i) xs,
calc (prod alg₁ alg₂).eval (term.func f ts) xs
= (prod alg₁ alg₂).func f (λ i, (prod alg₁ alg₂).eval (ts i) xs) : rfl ...
= (prod alg₁ alg₂).func f (λ i, (alg₁.eval (ts i) (λ i, (xs i).fst), alg₂.eval (ts i) (λ i, (xs i).snd))) : by rw this ...
= (alg₁.eval (term.func f ts) (λ i, (xs i).fst), alg₂.eval (term.func f ts) (λ i, (xs i).snd)) : by reflexivity
theorem prod_eval_fst {dom} {cod} (t : term sig dom cod) (xs) :
((prod alg₁ alg₂).eval t xs).fst = alg₁.eval t (λ i, (xs i).fst) := by rw prod_eval
theorem prod_eval_snd {dom} {cod} (t : term sig dom cod) (xs) :
((prod alg₁ alg₂).eval t xs).snd = alg₂.eval t (λ i, (xs i).snd) := by rw prod_eval
theorem prod_satisfies (e : identity sig) : alg₁.satisfies e → alg₂.satisfies e → (prod alg₁ alg₂).satisfies e :=
begin
intros H₁ H₂ val,
rw prod_eval,
rw prod_eval,
apply prod.eq,
apply H₁,
apply H₂,
end
section universal_property
variables {alg₁ alg₂} {alg : algebra sig} (h₁ : homomorphism alg alg₁) (h₂ : homomorphism alg alg₂)
include h₁ h₂
definition prod_hom : homomorphism alg (prod alg₁ alg₂) :=
{ map := λ t x, (h₁.map t x, h₂.map t x)
, func := λ f xs, prod.eq (by simp [h₁.func f]) (by simp [h₂.func f])
}
@[simp] theorem prod_hom_fst : (prod_fst alg₁ alg₂).comp (prod_hom h₁ h₂) = h₁ := homomorphism.ext $ λ _ _, rfl
@[simp] theorem prod_hom_snd : (prod_snd alg₁ alg₂).comp (prod_hom h₁ h₂) = h₂ := homomorphism.ext $ λ _ _, rfl
theorem prod_univ (h : homomorphism alg (prod alg₁ alg₂)) :
(prod_fst alg₁ alg₂).comp h = h₁ → (prod_snd alg₁ alg₂).comp h = h₂ → h = prod_hom h₁ h₂ :=
λ H₁ H₂, homomorphism.ext $ λ t x, prod.eq
(begin
transitivity ((prod_fst alg₁ alg₂).comp h).map t x,
reflexivity,
rw H₁,
reflexivity,
end)
(begin
transitivity ((prod_snd alg₁ alg₂).comp h).map t x,
reflexivity,
rw H₂,
reflexivity,
end)
end universal_property
end prod
end algebra
end universal
|
a2d66d557ee92156347a4f4c89abbde46d2ad3ee | 37da0369b6c03e380e057bf680d81e6c9fdf9219 | /hott/init/equiv.hlean | 48f936cf849d80cdf2fac5f72dbb4d5f262e492e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kodyvajjha/lean2 | 72b120d95c3a1d77f54433fa90c9810e14a931a4 | 227fcad22ab2bc27bb7471be7911075d101ba3f9 | refs/heads/master | 1,627,157,512,295 | 1,501,855,676,000 | 1,504,809,427,000 | 109,317,326 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,509,839,253,000 | 1,509,655,713,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 19,108 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Jeremy Avigad, Jakob von Raumer, Floris van Doorn
Ported from Coq HoTT
-/
prelude
import .path .function
open eq function lift
/- Equivalences -/
-- This is our definition of equivalence. In the HoTT-book it's called
-- ihae (half-adjoint equivalence).
structure is_equiv [class] {A B : Type} (f : A → B) :=
mk' ::
(inv : B → A)
(right_inv : Πb, f (inv b) = b)
(left_inv : Πa, inv (f a) = a)
(adj : Πx, right_inv (f x) = ap f (left_inv x))
attribute is_equiv.inv [reducible]
-- A more bundled version of equivalence
structure equiv (A B : Type) :=
(to_fun : A → B)
(to_is_equiv : is_equiv to_fun)
namespace is_equiv
/- Some instances and closure properties of equivalences -/
postfix ⁻¹ := inv
/- a second notation for the inverse, which is not overloaded -/
postfix [parsing_only] `⁻¹ᶠ`:std.prec.max_plus := inv
section
variables {A B C : Type} (g : B → C) (f : A → B) {f' : A → B}
-- The variant of mk' where f is explicit.
protected definition mk [constructor] := @is_equiv.mk' A B f
-- The identity function is an equivalence.
definition is_equiv_id [instance] [constructor] (A : Type) : (is_equiv (id : A → A)) :=
is_equiv.mk id id (λa, idp) (λa, idp) (λa, idp)
-- The composition of two equivalences is, again, an equivalence.
definition is_equiv_compose [constructor] [Hf : is_equiv f] [Hg : is_equiv g]
: is_equiv (g ∘ f) :=
is_equiv.mk (g ∘ f) (f⁻¹ ∘ g⁻¹)
abstract (λc, ap g (right_inv f (g⁻¹ c)) ⬝ right_inv g c) end
abstract (λa, ap (inv f) (left_inv g (f a)) ⬝ left_inv f a) end
abstract (λa, (whisker_left _ (adj g (f a))) ⬝
(ap_con g _ _)⁻¹ ⬝
ap02 g ((ap_con_eq_con (right_inv f) (left_inv g (f a)))⁻¹ ⬝
(ap_compose f (inv f) _ ◾ adj f a) ⬝
(ap_con f _ _)⁻¹
) ⬝
(ap_compose g f _)⁻¹) end
-- Any function equal to an equivalence is an equivlance as well.
variable {f}
definition is_equiv_eq_closed [Hf : is_equiv f] (Heq : f = f') : is_equiv f' :=
eq.rec_on Heq Hf
end
section
parameters {A B : Type} (f : A → B) (g : B → A)
(ret : Πb, f (g b) = b) (sec : Πa, g (f a) = a)
definition adjointify_left_inv' [unfold_full] (a : A) : g (f a) = a :=
ap g (ap f (inverse (sec a))) ⬝ ap g (ret (f a)) ⬝ sec a
theorem adjointify_adj' (a : A) : ret (f a) = ap f (adjointify_left_inv' a) :=
let fgretrfa := ap f (ap g (ret (f a))) in
let fgfinvsect := ap f (ap g (ap f (sec a)⁻¹)) in
let fgfa := f (g (f a)) in
let retrfa := ret (f a) in
have eq1 : ap f (sec a) = _,
from calc ap f (sec a)
= idp ⬝ ap f (sec a) : by rewrite idp_con
... = (ret (f a) ⬝ (ret (f a))⁻¹) ⬝ ap f (sec a) : by rewrite con.right_inv
... = ((ret fgfa)⁻¹ ⬝ ap (f ∘ g) (ret (f a))) ⬝ ap f (sec a) : by rewrite con_ap_eq_con
... = ((ret fgfa)⁻¹ ⬝ fgretrfa) ⬝ ap f (sec a) : by rewrite ap_compose
... = (ret fgfa)⁻¹ ⬝ (fgretrfa ⬝ ap f (sec a)) : by rewrite con.assoc,
have eq2 : ap f (sec a) ⬝ idp = (ret fgfa)⁻¹ ⬝ (fgretrfa ⬝ ap f (sec a)),
from !con_idp ⬝ eq1,
have eq3 : idp = _,
from calc idp
= (ap f (sec a))⁻¹ ⬝ ((ret fgfa)⁻¹ ⬝ (fgretrfa ⬝ ap f (sec a))) : eq_inv_con_of_con_eq eq2
... = ((ap f (sec a))⁻¹ ⬝ (ret fgfa)⁻¹) ⬝ (fgretrfa ⬝ ap f (sec a)) : by rewrite con.assoc'
... = (ap f (sec a)⁻¹ ⬝ (ret fgfa)⁻¹) ⬝ (fgretrfa ⬝ ap f (sec a)) : by rewrite ap_inv
... = ((ap f (sec a)⁻¹ ⬝ (ret fgfa)⁻¹) ⬝ fgretrfa) ⬝ ap f (sec a) : by rewrite con.assoc'
... = ((retrfa⁻¹ ⬝ ap (f ∘ g) (ap f (sec a)⁻¹)) ⬝ fgretrfa) ⬝ ap f (sec a) : by rewrite con_ap_eq_con
... = ((retrfa⁻¹ ⬝ fgfinvsect) ⬝ fgretrfa) ⬝ ap f (sec a) : by rewrite ap_compose
... = (retrfa⁻¹ ⬝ (fgfinvsect ⬝ fgretrfa)) ⬝ ap f (sec a) : by rewrite con.assoc'
... = retrfa⁻¹ ⬝ ap f (ap g (ap f (sec a)⁻¹) ⬝ ap g (ret (f a))) ⬝ ap f (sec a) : by rewrite ap_con
... = retrfa⁻¹ ⬝ (ap f (ap g (ap f (sec a)⁻¹) ⬝ ap g (ret (f a))) ⬝ ap f (sec a)) : by rewrite con.assoc'
... = retrfa⁻¹ ⬝ ap f ((ap g (ap f (sec a)⁻¹) ⬝ ap g (ret (f a))) ⬝ sec a) : by rewrite -ap_con,
show ret (f a) = ap f ((ap g (ap f (sec a)⁻¹) ⬝ ap g (ret (f a))) ⬝ sec a),
from eq_of_idp_eq_inv_con eq3
definition adjointify [constructor] : is_equiv f :=
is_equiv.mk f g ret adjointify_left_inv' adjointify_adj'
end
-- Any function pointwise equal to an equivalence is an equivalence as well.
definition homotopy_closed [constructor] {A B : Type} (f : A → B) {f' : A → B} [Hf : is_equiv f]
(Hty : f ~ f') : is_equiv f' :=
adjointify f'
(inv f)
(λ b, (Hty (inv f b))⁻¹ ⬝ right_inv f b)
(λ a, (ap (inv f) (Hty a))⁻¹ ⬝ left_inv f a)
definition inv_homotopy_closed [constructor] {A B : Type} {f : A → B} {f' : B → A}
[Hf : is_equiv f] (Hty : f⁻¹ ~ f') : is_equiv f :=
adjointify f
f'
(λ b, ap f !Hty⁻¹ ⬝ right_inv f b)
(λ a, !Hty⁻¹ ⬝ left_inv f a)
definition inv_homotopy_inv {A B : Type} {f g : A → B} [is_equiv f] [is_equiv g] (p : f ~ g)
: f⁻¹ ~ g⁻¹ :=
λb, (left_inv g (f⁻¹ b))⁻¹ ⬝ ap g⁻¹ ((p (f⁻¹ b))⁻¹ ⬝ right_inv f b)
definition is_equiv_up [instance] [constructor] (A : Type)
: is_equiv (up : A → lift A) :=
adjointify up down (λa, by induction a;reflexivity) (λa, idp)
section
variables {A B C : Type} (f : A → B) {f' : A → B} [Hf : is_equiv f] (g : B → C)
include Hf
-- The function equiv_rect says that given an equivalence f : A → B,
-- and a hypothesis from B, one may always assume that the hypothesis
-- is in the image of e.
-- In fibrational terms, if we have a fibration over B which has a section
-- once pulled back along an equivalence f : A → B, then it has a section
-- over all of B.
definition is_equiv_rect (P : B → Type) (g : Πa, P (f a)) (b : B) : P b :=
right_inv f b ▸ g (f⁻¹ b)
definition is_equiv_rect' (P : A → B → Type) (g : Πb, P (f⁻¹ b) b) (a : A) : P a (f a) :=
left_inv f a ▸ g (f a)
definition is_equiv_rect_comp (P : B → Type)
(df : Π (x : A), P (f x)) (x : A) : is_equiv_rect f P df (f x) = df x :=
calc
is_equiv_rect f P df (f x)
= right_inv f (f x) ▸ df (f⁻¹ (f x)) : by esimp
... = ap f (left_inv f x) ▸ df (f⁻¹ (f x)) : by rewrite -adj
... = left_inv f x ▸ df (f⁻¹ (f x)) : by rewrite -tr_compose
... = df x : by rewrite (apdt df (left_inv f x))
theorem adj_inv (b : B) : left_inv f (f⁻¹ b) = ap f⁻¹ (right_inv f b) :=
is_equiv_rect f _
(λa, eq.cancel_right (left_inv f (id a))
(whisker_left _ !ap_id⁻¹ ⬝ (ap_con_eq_con_ap (left_inv f) (left_inv f a))⁻¹) ⬝
!ap_compose ⬝ ap02 f⁻¹ (adj f a)⁻¹)
b
--The inverse of an equivalence is, again, an equivalence.
definition is_equiv_inv [instance] [constructor] [priority 500] : is_equiv f⁻¹ :=
is_equiv.mk f⁻¹ f (left_inv f) (right_inv f) (adj_inv f)
-- The 2-out-of-3 properties
definition cancel_right (g : B → C) [Hgf : is_equiv (g ∘ f)] : (is_equiv g) :=
have Hfinv : is_equiv f⁻¹, from is_equiv_inv f,
@homotopy_closed _ _ _ _ (is_equiv_compose (g ∘ f) f⁻¹) (λb, ap g (@right_inv _ _ f _ b))
definition cancel_left (g : C → A) [Hgf : is_equiv (f ∘ g)] : (is_equiv g) :=
have Hfinv : is_equiv f⁻¹, from is_equiv_inv f,
@homotopy_closed _ _ _ _ (is_equiv_compose f⁻¹ (f ∘ g)) (λa, left_inv f (g a))
definition eq_of_fn_eq_fn' [unfold 4] {x y : A} (q : f x = f y) : x = y :=
(left_inv f x)⁻¹ ⬝ ap f⁻¹ q ⬝ left_inv f y
definition ap_eq_of_fn_eq_fn' {x y : A} (q : f x = f y) : ap f (eq_of_fn_eq_fn' f q) = q :=
!ap_con ⬝ whisker_right _ !ap_con
⬝ ((!ap_inv ⬝ inverse2 (adj f _)⁻¹)
◾ (inverse (ap_compose f f⁻¹ _))
◾ (adj f _)⁻¹)
⬝ con_ap_con_eq_con_con (right_inv f) _ _
⬝ whisker_right _ !con.left_inv
⬝ !idp_con
definition eq_of_fn_eq_fn'_ap {x y : A} (q : x = y) : eq_of_fn_eq_fn' f (ap f q) = q :=
by induction q; apply con.left_inv
definition is_equiv_ap [instance] [constructor] (x y : A) : is_equiv (ap f : x = y → f x = f y) :=
adjointify
(ap f)
(eq_of_fn_eq_fn' f)
(ap_eq_of_fn_eq_fn' f)
(eq_of_fn_eq_fn'_ap f)
end
section
variables {A B C : Type} {f : A → B} [Hf : is_equiv f]
include Hf
section rewrite_rules
variables {a : A} {b : B}
definition eq_of_eq_inv (p : a = f⁻¹ b) : f a = b :=
ap f p ⬝ right_inv f b
definition eq_of_inv_eq (p : f⁻¹ b = a) : b = f a :=
(eq_of_eq_inv p⁻¹)⁻¹
definition inv_eq_of_eq (p : b = f a) : f⁻¹ b = a :=
ap f⁻¹ p ⬝ left_inv f a
definition eq_inv_of_eq (p : f a = b) : a = f⁻¹ b :=
(inv_eq_of_eq p⁻¹)⁻¹
end rewrite_rules
variable (f)
section pre_compose
variables (α : A → C) (β : B → C)
definition homotopy_of_homotopy_inv_pre (p : β ~ α ∘ f⁻¹) : β ∘ f ~ α :=
λ a, p (f a) ⬝ ap α (left_inv f a)
definition homotopy_of_inv_homotopy_pre (p : α ∘ f⁻¹ ~ β) : α ~ β ∘ f :=
λ a, (ap α (left_inv f a))⁻¹ ⬝ p (f a)
definition inv_homotopy_of_homotopy_pre (p : α ~ β ∘ f) : α ∘ f⁻¹ ~ β :=
λ b, p (f⁻¹ b) ⬝ ap β (right_inv f b)
definition homotopy_inv_of_homotopy_pre (p : β ∘ f ~ α) : β ~ α ∘ f⁻¹ :=
λ b, (ap β (right_inv f b))⁻¹ ⬝ p (f⁻¹ b)
end pre_compose
section post_compose
variables (α : C → A) (β : C → B)
definition homotopy_of_homotopy_inv_post (p : α ~ f⁻¹ ∘ β) : f ∘ α ~ β :=
λ c, ap f (p c) ⬝ (right_inv f (β c))
definition homotopy_of_inv_homotopy_post (p : f⁻¹ ∘ β ~ α) : β ~ f ∘ α :=
λ c, (right_inv f (β c))⁻¹ ⬝ ap f (p c)
definition inv_homotopy_of_homotopy_post (p : β ~ f ∘ α) : f⁻¹ ∘ β ~ α :=
λ c, ap f⁻¹ (p c) ⬝ (left_inv f (α c))
definition homotopy_inv_of_homotopy_post (p : f ∘ α ~ β) : α ~ f⁻¹ ∘ β :=
λ c, (left_inv f (α c))⁻¹ ⬝ ap f⁻¹ (p c)
end post_compose
end
--Transporting is an equivalence
definition is_equiv_tr [constructor] {A : Type} (P : A → Type) {x y : A}
(p : x = y) : (is_equiv (transport P p)) :=
is_equiv.mk _ (transport P p⁻¹) (tr_inv_tr p) (inv_tr_tr p) (tr_inv_tr_lemma p)
-- a version where the transport is a cast. Note: A and B live in the same universe here.
definition is_equiv_cast [constructor] {A B : Type} (H : A = B) : is_equiv (cast H) :=
is_equiv_tr (λX, X) H
section
variables {A : Type} {B C : A → Type} (f : Π{a}, B a → C a) [H : Πa, is_equiv (@f a)]
{g : A → A} {g' : A → A} (h : Π{a}, B (g' a) → B (g a)) (h' : Π{a}, C (g' a) → C (g a))
include H
definition inv_commute' (p : Π⦃a : A⦄ (b : B (g' a)), f (h b) = h' (f b)) {a : A}
(c : C (g' a)) : f⁻¹ (h' c) = h (f⁻¹ c) :=
eq_of_fn_eq_fn' f (right_inv f (h' c) ⬝ ap h' (right_inv f c)⁻¹ ⬝ (p (f⁻¹ c))⁻¹)
definition fun_commute_of_inv_commute' (p : Π⦃a : A⦄ (c : C (g' a)), f⁻¹ (h' c) = h (f⁻¹ c))
{a : A} (b : B (g' a)) : f (h b) = h' (f b) :=
eq_of_fn_eq_fn' f⁻¹ (left_inv f (h b) ⬝ ap h (left_inv f b)⁻¹ ⬝ (p (f b))⁻¹)
definition ap_inv_commute' (p : Π⦃a : A⦄ (b : B (g' a)), f (h b) = h' (f b)) {a : A}
(c : C (g' a)) : ap f (inv_commute' @f @h @h' p c)
= right_inv f (h' c) ⬝ ap h' (right_inv f c)⁻¹ ⬝ (p (f⁻¹ c))⁻¹ :=
!ap_eq_of_fn_eq_fn'
-- inv_commute'_fn is in types.equiv
end
-- This is inv_commute' for A ≡ unit
definition inv_commute1' {B C : Type} (f : B → C) [is_equiv f] (h : B → B) (h' : C → C)
(p : Π(b : B), f (h b) = h' (f b)) (c : C) : f⁻¹ (h' c) = h (f⁻¹ c) :=
eq_of_fn_eq_fn' f (right_inv f (h' c) ⬝ ap h' (right_inv f c)⁻¹ ⬝ (p (f⁻¹ c))⁻¹)
end is_equiv
open is_equiv
namespace eq
local attribute is_equiv_tr [instance]
definition tr_inv_fn {A : Type} {B : A → Type} {a a' : A} (p : a = a') :
transport B p⁻¹ = (transport B p)⁻¹ := idp
definition tr_inv {A : Type} {B : A → Type} {a a' : A} (p : a = a') (b : B a') :
p⁻¹ ▸ b = (transport B p)⁻¹ b := idp
definition cast_inv_fn {A B : Type} (p : A = B) : cast p⁻¹ = (cast p)⁻¹ := idp
definition cast_inv {A B : Type} (p : A = B) (b : B) : cast p⁻¹ b = (cast p)⁻¹ b := idp
end eq
infix ` ≃ `:25 := equiv
attribute equiv.to_is_equiv [instance]
namespace equiv
attribute to_fun [coercion]
section
variables {A B C : Type}
protected definition MK [reducible] [constructor] (f : A → B) (g : B → A)
(right_inv : Πb, f (g b) = b) (left_inv : Πa, g (f a) = a) : A ≃ B :=
equiv.mk f (adjointify f g right_inv left_inv)
definition to_inv [reducible] [unfold 3] (f : A ≃ B) : B → A := f⁻¹
definition to_right_inv [reducible] [unfold 3] (f : A ≃ B) (b : B) : f (f⁻¹ b) = b :=
right_inv f b
definition to_left_inv [reducible] [unfold 3] (f : A ≃ B) (a : A) : f⁻¹ (f a) = a :=
left_inv f a
protected definition rfl [refl] [constructor] : A ≃ A :=
equiv.mk id !is_equiv_id
protected definition refl [constructor] [reducible] (A : Type) : A ≃ A :=
@equiv.rfl A
protected definition symm [symm] [constructor] (f : A ≃ B) : B ≃ A :=
equiv.mk f⁻¹ !is_equiv_inv
protected definition trans [trans] [constructor] (f : A ≃ B) (g : B ≃ C) : A ≃ C :=
equiv.mk (g ∘ f) !is_equiv_compose
infixl ` ⬝e `:75 := equiv.trans
postfix `⁻¹ᵉ`:(max + 1) := equiv.symm
-- notation for inverse which is not overloaded
abbreviation erfl [constructor] := @equiv.rfl
definition to_inv_trans [reducible] [unfold_full] (f : A ≃ B) (g : B ≃ C)
: to_inv (f ⬝e g) = to_fun (g⁻¹ᵉ ⬝e f⁻¹ᵉ) :=
idp
definition equiv_change_fun [constructor] (f : A ≃ B) {f' : A → B} (Heq : f ~ f') : A ≃ B :=
equiv.mk f' (is_equiv.homotopy_closed f Heq)
definition equiv_change_inv [constructor] (f : A ≃ B) {f' : B → A} (Heq : f⁻¹ ~ f')
: A ≃ B :=
equiv.mk f (inv_homotopy_closed Heq)
--rename: eq_equiv_fn_eq_fn_of_is_equiv
definition eq_equiv_fn_eq [constructor] (f : A → B) [H : is_equiv f] (a b : A) : (a = b) ≃ (f a = f b) :=
equiv.mk (ap f) !is_equiv_ap
--rename: eq_equiv_fn_eq_fn
definition eq_equiv_fn_eq_of_equiv [constructor] (f : A ≃ B) (a b : A) : (a = b) ≃ (f a = f b) :=
equiv.mk (ap f) !is_equiv_ap
definition equiv_ap [constructor] (P : A → Type) {a b : A} (p : a = b) : P a ≃ P b :=
equiv.mk (transport P p) !is_equiv_tr
definition equiv_of_eq [constructor] {A B : Type} (p : A = B) : A ≃ B :=
equiv.mk (cast p) !is_equiv_tr
definition equiv_of_eq_refl [reducible] [unfold_full] (A : Type)
: equiv_of_eq (refl A) = equiv.refl A :=
idp
definition eq_of_fn_eq_fn [unfold 3] (f : A ≃ B) {x y : A} (q : f x = f y) : x = y :=
(left_inv f x)⁻¹ ⬝ ap f⁻¹ q ⬝ left_inv f y
definition eq_of_fn_eq_fn_inv [unfold 3] (f : A ≃ B) {x y : B} (q : f⁻¹ x = f⁻¹ y) : x = y :=
(right_inv f x)⁻¹ ⬝ ap f q ⬝ right_inv f y
definition ap_eq_of_fn_eq_fn (f : A ≃ B) {x y : A} (q : f x = f y) : ap f (eq_of_fn_eq_fn' f q) = q :=
ap_eq_of_fn_eq_fn' f q
definition eq_of_fn_eq_fn_ap (f : A ≃ B) {x y : A} (q : x = y) : eq_of_fn_eq_fn' f (ap f q) = q :=
eq_of_fn_eq_fn'_ap f q
definition to_inv_homotopy_inv {f g : A ≃ B} (p : f ~ g) : f⁻¹ᵉ ~ g⁻¹ᵉ :=
inv_homotopy_inv p
--we need this theorem for the funext_of_ua proof
theorem inv_eq {A B : Type} (eqf eqg : A ≃ B) (p : eqf = eqg) : (to_fun eqf)⁻¹ = (to_fun eqg)⁻¹ :=
eq.rec_on p idp
definition equiv_of_equiv_of_eq [trans] {A B C : Type} (p : A = B) (q : B ≃ C) : A ≃ C :=
equiv_of_eq p ⬝e q
definition equiv_of_eq_of_equiv [trans] {A B C : Type} (p : A ≃ B) (q : B = C) : A ≃ C :=
p ⬝e equiv_of_eq q
definition equiv_lift [constructor] (A : Type) : A ≃ lift A := equiv.mk up _
definition equiv_rect (f : A ≃ B) (P : B → Type) (g : Πa, P (f a)) (b : B) : P b :=
right_inv f b ▸ g (f⁻¹ b)
definition equiv_rect' (f : A ≃ B) (P : A → B → Type) (g : Πb, P (f⁻¹ b) b) (a : A) : P a (f a) :=
left_inv f a ▸ g (f a)
definition equiv_rect_comp (f : A ≃ B) (P : B → Type)
(df : Π (x : A), P (f x)) (x : A) : equiv_rect f P df (f x) = df x :=
calc
equiv_rect f P df (f x)
= right_inv f (f x) ▸ df (f⁻¹ (f x)) : by esimp
... = ap f (left_inv f x) ▸ df (f⁻¹ (f x)) : by rewrite -adj
... = left_inv f x ▸ df (f⁻¹ (f x)) : by rewrite -tr_compose
... = df x : by rewrite (apdt df (left_inv f x))
end
section
variables {A B : Type} (f : A ≃ B) {a : A} {b : B}
definition to_eq_of_eq_inv (p : a = f⁻¹ b) : f a = b :=
ap f p ⬝ right_inv f b
definition to_eq_of_inv_eq (p : f⁻¹ b = a) : b = f a :=
(eq_of_eq_inv p⁻¹)⁻¹
definition to_inv_eq_of_eq (p : b = f a) : f⁻¹ b = a :=
ap f⁻¹ p ⬝ left_inv f a
definition to_eq_inv_of_eq (p : f a = b) : a = f⁻¹ b :=
(inv_eq_of_eq p⁻¹)⁻¹
end
section
variables {A : Type} {B C : A → Type} (f : Π{a}, B a ≃ C a)
{g : A → A} {g' : A → A} (h : Π{a}, B (g' a) → B (g a)) (h' : Π{a}, C (g' a) → C (g a))
definition inv_commute (p : Π⦃a : A⦄ (b : B (g' a)), f (h b) = h' (f b)) {a : A}
(c : C (g' a)) : f⁻¹ (h' c) = h (f⁻¹ c) :=
inv_commute' @f @h @h' p c
definition fun_commute_of_inv_commute (p : Π⦃a : A⦄ (c : C (g' a)), f⁻¹ (h' c) = h (f⁻¹ c))
{a : A} (b : B (g' a)) : f (h b) = h' (f b) :=
fun_commute_of_inv_commute' @f @h @h' p b
definition inv_commute1 {B C : Type} (f : B ≃ C) (h : B → B) (h' : C → C)
(p : Π(b : B), f (h b) = h' (f b)) (c : C) : f⁻¹ (h' c) = h (f⁻¹ c) :=
inv_commute1' (to_fun f) h h' p c
end
infixl ` ⬝pe `:75 := equiv_of_equiv_of_eq
infixl ` ⬝ep `:75 := equiv_of_eq_of_equiv
end equiv
open equiv
namespace is_equiv
definition is_equiv_of_equiv_of_homotopy [constructor] {A B : Type} (f : A ≃ B)
{f' : A → B} (Hty : f ~ f') : is_equiv f' :=
@(homotopy_closed f) f' _ Hty
end is_equiv
export [unfold] equiv
export [unfold] is_equiv
|
e5d43dce1301ea0352994338e7cd71fb7d44ef40 | 4fa161becb8ce7378a709f5992a594764699e268 | /src/data/nat/sqrt.lean | cfd161773b815bcd6c702796670afae107e2fec2 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | laughinggas/mathlib | e4aa4565ae34e46e834434284cb26bd9d67bc373 | 86dcd5cda7a5017c8b3c8876c89a510a19d49aad | refs/heads/master | 1,669,496,232,688 | 1,592,831,995,000 | 1,592,831,995,000 | 274,155,979 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,592,835,190,000 | 1,592,835,189,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,010 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
An efficient binary implementation of a (sqrt n) function that
returns s s.t.
s*s ≤ n ≤ s*s + s + s
-/
import data.nat.cast
import init_.data.int.order
namespace nat
theorem sqrt_aux_dec {b} (h : b ≠ 0) : shiftr b 2 < b :=
begin
simp [shiftr_eq_div_pow],
apply (nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul' (dec_trivial : 0 < 4)).2,
have := nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left
(dec_trivial : 1 < 4) (nat.pos_of_ne_zero h),
rwa mul_one at this
end
def sqrt_aux : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ → ℕ
| b r n := if b0 : b = 0 then r else
let b' := shiftr b 2 in
have b' < b, from sqrt_aux_dec b0,
match (n - (r + b : ℕ) : ℤ) with
| (n' : ℕ) := sqrt_aux b' (div2 r + b) n'
| _ := sqrt_aux b' (div2 r) n
end
/-- `sqrt n` is the square root of a natural number `n`. If `n` is not a
perfect square, it returns the largest `k:ℕ` such that `k*k ≤ n`. -/
def sqrt (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
match size n with
| 0 := 0
| succ s := sqrt_aux (shiftl 1 (bit0 (div2 s))) 0 n
end
theorem sqrt_aux_0 (r n) : sqrt_aux 0 r n = r :=
by rw sqrt_aux; simp
local attribute [simp] sqrt_aux_0
theorem sqrt_aux_1 {r n b} (h : b ≠ 0) {n'} (h₂ : r + b + n' = n) :
sqrt_aux b r n = sqrt_aux (shiftr b 2) (div2 r + b) n' :=
by rw sqrt_aux; simp only [h, h₂.symm, int.coe_nat_add, if_false];
rw [add_comm _ (n':ℤ), add_sub_cancel, sqrt_aux._match_1]
theorem sqrt_aux_2 {r n b} (h : b ≠ 0) (h₂ : n < r + b) :
sqrt_aux b r n = sqrt_aux (shiftr b 2) (div2 r) n :=
begin
rw sqrt_aux; simp only [h, h₂, if_false],
cases int.eq_neg_succ_of_lt_zero
(sub_lt_zero.2 (int.coe_nat_lt_coe_nat_of_lt h₂)) with k e,
rw [e, sqrt_aux._match_1]
end
private def is_sqrt (n q : ℕ) : Prop := q*q ≤ n ∧ n < (q+1)*(q+1)
private lemma sqrt_aux_is_sqrt_lemma (m r n : ℕ)
(h₁ : r*r ≤ n)
(m') (hm : shiftr (2^m * 2^m) 2 = m')
(H1 : n < (r + 2^m) * (r + 2^m) →
is_sqrt n (sqrt_aux m' (r * 2^m) (n - r * r)))
(H2 : (r + 2^m) * (r + 2^m) ≤ n →
is_sqrt n (sqrt_aux m' ((r + 2^m) * 2^m) (n - (r + 2^m) * (r + 2^m)))) :
is_sqrt n (sqrt_aux (2^m * 2^m) ((2*r)*2^m) (n - r*r)) :=
begin
have b0 :=
have b0:_, from ne_of_gt (@pos_pow_of_pos 2 m dec_trivial),
nat.mul_ne_zero b0 b0,
have lb : n - r * r < 2 * r * 2^m + 2^m * 2^m ↔
n < (r+2^m)*(r+2^m), {
rw [nat.sub_lt_right_iff_lt_add h₁],
simp [left_distrib, right_distrib, two_mul, mul_comm, mul_assoc,
add_comm, add_assoc, add_left_comm] },
have re : div2 (2 * r * 2^m) = r * 2^m, {
rw [div2_val, mul_assoc,
nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ (dec_trivial:2>0)] },
cases lt_or_ge n ((r+2^m)*(r+2^m)) with hl hl,
{ rw [sqrt_aux_2 b0 (lb.2 hl), hm, re], apply H1 hl },
{ cases le.dest hl with n' e,
rw [@sqrt_aux_1 (2 * r * 2^m) (n-r*r) (2^m * 2^m) b0 (n - (r + 2^m) * (r + 2^m)),
hm, re, ← right_distrib],
{ apply H2 hl },
apply eq.symm, apply nat.sub_eq_of_eq_add,
rw [← add_assoc, (_ : r*r + _ = _)],
exact (nat.add_sub_cancel' hl).symm,
simp [left_distrib, right_distrib, two_mul, mul_comm, mul_assoc, add_assoc] },
end
private lemma sqrt_aux_is_sqrt (n) : ∀ m r,
r*r ≤ n → n < (r + 2^(m+1)) * (r + 2^(m+1)) →
is_sqrt n (sqrt_aux (2^m * 2^m) (2*r*2^m) (n - r*r))
| 0 r h₁ h₂ := by apply sqrt_aux_is_sqrt_lemma 0 r n h₁ 0 rfl;
intros; simp; [exact ⟨h₁, a⟩, exact ⟨a, h₂⟩]
| (m+1) r h₁ h₂ := begin
apply sqrt_aux_is_sqrt_lemma
(m+1) r n h₁ (2^m * 2^m)
(by simp [shiftr, nat.pow_succ, div2_val, mul_comm, mul_left_comm];
repeat {rw @nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ 2 dec_trivial});
intros,
{ have := sqrt_aux_is_sqrt m r h₁ a,
simpa [nat.pow_succ, mul_comm, mul_assoc] },
{ rw [nat.pow_succ, mul_two, ← add_assoc] at h₂,
have := sqrt_aux_is_sqrt m (r + 2^(m+1)) a h₂,
rwa show (r + 2^(m + 1)) * 2^(m+1) = 2 * (r + 2^(m + 1)) * 2^m,
by simp [nat.pow_succ, mul_comm, mul_left_comm] }
end
private lemma sqrt_is_sqrt (n : ℕ) : is_sqrt n (sqrt n) :=
begin
generalize e : size n = s, cases s with s; simp [e, sqrt],
{ rw [size_eq_zero.1 e, is_sqrt], exact dec_trivial },
{ have := sqrt_aux_is_sqrt n (div2 s) 0 (zero_le _),
simp [show 2^div2 s * 2^div2 s = shiftl 1 (bit0 (div2 s)), by {
generalize: div2 s = x,
change bit0 x with x+x,
rw [one_shiftl, pow_add] }] at this,
apply this,
rw [← pow_add, ← mul_two], apply size_le.1,
rw e, apply (@div_lt_iff_lt_mul _ _ 2 dec_trivial).1,
rw [div2_val], apply lt_succ_self }
end
theorem sqrt_le (n : ℕ) : sqrt n * sqrt n ≤ n :=
(sqrt_is_sqrt n).left
theorem lt_succ_sqrt (n : ℕ) : n < succ (sqrt n) * succ (sqrt n) :=
(sqrt_is_sqrt n).right
theorem sqrt_le_add (n : ℕ) : n ≤ sqrt n * sqrt n + sqrt n + sqrt n :=
by rw ← succ_mul; exact le_of_lt_succ (lt_succ_sqrt n)
theorem le_sqrt {m n : ℕ} : m ≤ sqrt n ↔ m*m ≤ n :=
⟨λ h, le_trans (mul_self_le_mul_self h) (sqrt_le n),
λ h, le_of_lt_succ $ mul_self_lt_mul_self_iff.2 $
lt_of_le_of_lt h (lt_succ_sqrt n)⟩
theorem sqrt_lt {m n : ℕ} : sqrt m < n ↔ m < n*n :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le le_sqrt
theorem sqrt_le_self (n : ℕ) : sqrt n ≤ n :=
le_trans (le_mul_self _) (sqrt_le n)
theorem sqrt_le_sqrt {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : sqrt m ≤ sqrt n :=
le_sqrt.2 (le_trans (sqrt_le _) h)
theorem sqrt_eq_zero {n : ℕ} : sqrt n = 0 ↔ n = 0 :=
⟨λ h, eq_zero_of_le_zero $ le_of_lt_succ $ (@sqrt_lt n 1).1 $
by rw [h]; exact dec_trivial,
λ e, e.symm ▸ rfl⟩
theorem eq_sqrt {n q} : q = sqrt n ↔ q*q ≤ n ∧ n < (q+1)*(q+1) :=
⟨λ e, e.symm ▸ sqrt_is_sqrt n,
λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, le_antisymm (le_sqrt.2 h₁) (le_of_lt_succ $ sqrt_lt.2 h₂)⟩
theorem le_three_of_sqrt_eq_one {n : ℕ} (h : sqrt n = 1) : n ≤ 3 :=
le_of_lt_succ $ (@sqrt_lt n 2).1 $
by rw [h]; exact dec_trivial
theorem sqrt_lt_self {n : ℕ} (h : 1 < n) : sqrt n < n :=
sqrt_lt.2 $ by
have := nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h (lt_of_succ_lt h);
rwa [mul_one] at this
theorem sqrt_pos {n : ℕ} : 0 < sqrt n ↔ 0 < n := le_sqrt
theorem sqrt_add_eq (n : ℕ) {a : ℕ} (h : a ≤ n + n) : sqrt (n*n + a) = n :=
le_antisymm
(le_of_lt_succ $ sqrt_lt.2 $ by rw [succ_mul, mul_succ, add_succ, add_assoc];
exact lt_succ_of_le (nat.add_le_add_left h _))
(le_sqrt.2 $ nat.le_add_right _ _)
theorem sqrt_eq (n : ℕ) : sqrt (n*n) = n :=
sqrt_add_eq n (zero_le _)
theorem sqrt_succ_le_succ_sqrt (n : ℕ) : sqrt n.succ ≤ n.sqrt.succ :=
le_of_lt_succ $ sqrt_lt.2 $ lt_succ_of_le $ succ_le_succ $
le_trans (sqrt_le_add n) $ add_le_add_right
(by refine add_le_add
(mul_le_mul_right _ _) _; exact le_add_right _ 2) _
theorem exists_mul_self (x : ℕ) :
(∃ n, n * n = x) ↔ sqrt x * sqrt x = x :=
⟨λ ⟨n, hn⟩, by rw [← hn, sqrt_eq], λ h, ⟨sqrt x, h⟩⟩
end nat
|
abc2e992c56753b42def81d8c0e33acafc5555af | 57c233acf9386e610d99ed20ef139c5f97504ba3 | /src/topology/algebra/filter_basis.lean | 9112cdc01372e2cc3721e227ce91aec1853d9de9 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | robertylewis/mathlib | 3d16e3e6daf5ddde182473e03a1b601d2810952c | 1d13f5b932f5e40a8308e3840f96fc882fae01f0 | refs/heads/master | 1,651,379,945,369 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 98,875,504 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,644,253,514,000 | 1,501,495,700,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 15,934 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot
-/
import order.filter.bases
import topology.algebra.module.basic
/-!
# Group and ring filter bases
A `group_filter_basis` is a `filter_basis` on a group with some properties relating
the basis to the group structure. The main theorem is that a `group_filter_basis`
on a group gives a topology on the group which makes it into a topological group
with neighborhoods of the neutral element generated by the given basis.
## Main definitions and results
Given a group `G` and a ring `R`:
* `group_filter_basis G`: the type of filter bases that will become neighborhood of `1`
for a topology on `G` compatible with the group structure
* `group_filter_basis.topology`: the associated topology
* `group_filter_basis.is_topological_group`: the compatibility between the above topology
and the group structure
* `ring_filter_basis R`: the type of filter bases that will become neighborhood of `0`
for a topology on `R` compatible with the ring structure
* `ring_filter_basis.topology`: the associated topology
* `ring_filter_basis.is_topological_ring`: the compatibility between the above topology
and the ring structure
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
-/
open filter set topological_space function
open_locale topological_space filter pointwise
universe u
/-- A `group_filter_basis` on a group is a `filter_basis` satisfying some additional axioms.
Example : if `G` is a topological group then the neighbourhoods of the identity are a
`group_filter_basis`. Conversely given a `group_filter_basis` one can define a topology
compatible with the group structure on `G`. -/
class group_filter_basis (G : Type u) [group G] extends filter_basis G :=
(one' : ∀ {U}, U ∈ sets → (1 : G) ∈ U)
(mul' : ∀ {U}, U ∈ sets → ∃ V ∈ sets, V * V ⊆ U)
(inv' : ∀ {U}, U ∈ sets → ∃ V ∈ sets, V ⊆ (λ x, x⁻¹) ⁻¹' U)
(conj' : ∀ x₀, ∀ {U}, U ∈ sets → ∃ V ∈ sets, V ⊆ (λ x, x₀*x*x₀⁻¹) ⁻¹' U)
/-- A `add_group_filter_basis` on an additive group is a `filter_basis` satisfying some additional
axioms. Example : if `G` is a topological group then the neighbourhoods of the identity are a
`add_group_filter_basis`. Conversely given a `add_group_filter_basis` one can define a topology
compatible with the group structure on `G`. -/
class add_group_filter_basis (A : Type u) [add_group A] extends filter_basis A :=
(zero' : ∀ {U}, U ∈ sets → (0 : A) ∈ U)
(add' : ∀ {U}, U ∈ sets → ∃ V ∈ sets, V + V ⊆ U)
(neg' : ∀ {U}, U ∈ sets → ∃ V ∈ sets, V ⊆ (λ x, -x) ⁻¹' U)
(conj' : ∀ x₀, ∀ {U}, U ∈ sets → ∃ V ∈ sets, V ⊆ (λ x, x₀+x+-x₀) ⁻¹' U)
attribute [to_additive] group_filter_basis
attribute [to_additive] group_filter_basis.one'
attribute [to_additive] group_filter_basis.mul'
attribute [to_additive] group_filter_basis.inv'
attribute [to_additive] group_filter_basis.conj'
attribute [to_additive] group_filter_basis.to_filter_basis
/-- `group_filter_basis` constructor in the commutative group case. -/
@[to_additive "`add_group_filter_basis` constructor in the commutative group case."]
def group_filter_basis_of_comm {G : Type*} [comm_group G]
(sets : set (set G))
(nonempty : sets.nonempty)
(inter_sets : ∀ (x y), x ∈ sets → y ∈ sets → ∃ z ∈ sets, z ⊆ x ∩ y)
(one : ∀ U ∈ sets, (1 : G) ∈ U)
(mul : ∀ U ∈ sets, ∃ V ∈ sets, V * V ⊆ U)
(inv : ∀ U ∈ sets, ∃ V ∈ sets, V ⊆ (λ x, x⁻¹) ⁻¹' U) : group_filter_basis G :=
{ sets := sets,
nonempty := nonempty,
inter_sets := inter_sets,
one' := one,
mul' := mul,
inv' := inv,
conj' := λ x U U_in, ⟨U, U_in, by simp⟩ }
namespace group_filter_basis
variables {G : Type u} [group G] {B : group_filter_basis G}
@[to_additive]
instance : has_mem (set G) (group_filter_basis G) :=
⟨λ s f, s ∈ f.sets⟩
@[to_additive] lemma one {U : set G} : U ∈ B → (1 : G) ∈ U := group_filter_basis.one'
@[to_additive] lemma mul {U : set G} : U ∈ B → ∃ V ∈ B, V*V ⊆ U := group_filter_basis.mul'
@[to_additive] lemma inv {U : set G} : U ∈ B → ∃ V ∈ B, V ⊆ (λ x, x⁻¹) ⁻¹' U :=
group_filter_basis.inv'
@[to_additive]
lemma conj : ∀ x₀, ∀ {U}, U ∈ B → ∃ V ∈ B, V ⊆ (λ x, x₀*x*x₀⁻¹) ⁻¹' U :=
group_filter_basis.conj'
/-- The trivial group filter basis consists of `{1}` only. The associated topology
is discrete. -/
@[to_additive "The trivial additive group filter basis consists of `{0}` only. The associated
topology is discrete."]
instance : inhabited (group_filter_basis G) :=
⟨begin
refine { sets := {{1}}, nonempty := singleton_nonempty _, .. },
all_goals { simp only [exists_prop, mem_singleton_iff] },
{ rintros - - rfl rfl,
use {1},
simp },
{ simp },
{ rintro - rfl,
use {1},
simp },
{ rintro - rfl,
use {1},
simp },
{ rintro x₀ - rfl,
use {1},
simp }
end⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_subset_self (B : group_filter_basis G) {U : set G} (h : U ∈ B) : U ⊆ U * U :=
λ x x_in, ⟨1, x, one h, x_in, one_mul x⟩
/-- The neighborhood function of a `group_filter_basis` -/
@[to_additive "The neighborhood function of a `add_group_filter_basis`"]
def N (B : group_filter_basis G) : G → filter G :=
λ x, map (λ y, x*y) B.to_filter_basis.filter
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma N_one (B : group_filter_basis G) : B.N 1 = B.to_filter_basis.filter :=
by simp only [N, one_mul, map_id']
@[to_additive]
protected lemma has_basis (B : group_filter_basis G) (x : G) :
has_basis (B.N x) (λ V : set G, V ∈ B) (λ V, (λ y, x*y) '' V) :=
has_basis.map (λ y, x * y) to_filter_basis.has_basis
/-- The topological space structure coming from a group filter basis. -/
@[to_additive "The topological space structure coming from an additive group filter basis."]
def topology (B : group_filter_basis G) : topological_space G :=
topological_space.mk_of_nhds B.N
@[to_additive]
lemma nhds_eq (B : group_filter_basis G) {x₀ : G} :
@nhds G (B.topology) x₀ = B.N x₀ :=
begin
rw [topological_space.nhds_mk_of_nhds],
{ intros x U U_in,
rw (B.has_basis x).mem_iff at U_in,
rcases U_in with ⟨V, V_in, H⟩,
simpa [mem_pure] using H (mem_image_of_mem _ (group_filter_basis.one V_in)), },
{ intros x U U_in,
rw (B.has_basis x).mem_iff at U_in,
rcases U_in with ⟨V, V_in, H⟩,
rcases group_filter_basis.mul V_in with ⟨W, W_in, hW⟩,
use [(λ y, x*y) '' W, image_mem_map (filter_basis.mem_filter_of_mem _ W_in)],
split,
{ rw image_subset_iff at H ⊢,
exact ((B.prod_subset_self W_in).trans hW).trans H },
{ rintros y ⟨t, tW, rfl⟩,
rw (B.has_basis _).mem_iff,
use [W, W_in],
apply subset.trans _ H, clear H,
rintros z ⟨w, wW, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨t*w, hW (mul_mem_mul tW wW), by simp [mul_assoc]⟩ } }
end
@[to_additive]
lemma nhds_one_eq (B : group_filter_basis G) :
@nhds G (B.topology) (1 : G) = B.to_filter_basis.filter :=
by { rw B.nhds_eq, simp only [N, one_mul], exact map_id }
@[to_additive]
lemma nhds_has_basis (B : group_filter_basis G) (x₀ : G) :
has_basis (@nhds G B.topology x₀) (λ V : set G, V ∈ B) (λ V, (λ y, x₀ * y) '' V) :=
by { rw B.nhds_eq, apply B.has_basis }
@[to_additive]
lemma nhds_one_has_basis (B : group_filter_basis G) :
has_basis (@nhds G B.topology 1) (λ V : set G, V ∈ B) id :=
by { rw B.nhds_one_eq, exact B.to_filter_basis.has_basis }
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_nhds_one (B : group_filter_basis G) {U : set G} (hU : U ∈ B) : U ∈ @nhds G B.topology 1 :=
begin
rw B.nhds_one_has_basis.mem_iff,
exact ⟨U, hU, rfl.subset⟩
end
/-- If a group is endowed with a topological structure coming from
a group filter basis then it's a topological group. -/
@[to_additive, priority 100]
instance is_topological_group (B : group_filter_basis G) :
@topological_group G B.topology _ :=
begin
letI := B.topology,
have basis := B.nhds_one_has_basis,
have basis' := basis.prod basis,
refine topological_group.of_nhds_one _ _ _ _,
{ rw basis'.tendsto_iff basis,
suffices : ∀ U ∈ B, ∃ V W, (V ∈ B ∧ W ∈ B) ∧ ∀ a b, a ∈ V → b ∈ W → a * b ∈ U, by simpa,
intros U U_in,
rcases mul U_in with ⟨V, V_in, hV⟩,
use [V, V, V_in, V_in],
intros a b a_in b_in,
exact hV ⟨a, b, a_in, b_in, rfl⟩ },
{ rw basis.tendsto_iff basis,
intros U U_in,
simpa using inv U_in },
{ intro x₀,
rw [nhds_eq, nhds_one_eq],
refl },
{ intro x₀,
rw basis.tendsto_iff basis,
intros U U_in,
exact conj x₀ U_in }
end
end group_filter_basis
/-- A `ring_filter_basis` on a ring is a `filter_basis` satisfying some additional axioms.
Example : if `R` is a topological ring then the neighbourhoods of the identity are a
`ring_filter_basis`. Conversely given a `ring_filter_basis` on a ring `R`, one can define a
topology on `R` which is compatible with the ring structure. -/
class ring_filter_basis (R : Type u) [ring R] extends add_group_filter_basis R :=
(mul' : ∀ {U}, U ∈ sets → ∃ V ∈ sets, V * V ⊆ U)
(mul_left' : ∀ (x₀ : R) {U}, U ∈ sets → ∃ V ∈ sets, V ⊆ (λ x, x₀*x) ⁻¹' U)
(mul_right' : ∀ (x₀ : R) {U}, U ∈ sets → ∃ V ∈ sets, V ⊆ (λ x, x*x₀) ⁻¹' U)
namespace ring_filter_basis
variables {R : Type u} [ring R] (B : ring_filter_basis R)
instance : has_mem (set R) (ring_filter_basis R) :=
⟨λ s B, s ∈ B.sets⟩
lemma mul {U : set R} (hU : U ∈ B) : ∃ V ∈ B, V * V ⊆ U :=
mul' hU
lemma mul_left (x₀ : R) {U : set R} (hU : U ∈ B) :
∃ V ∈ B, V ⊆ (λ x, x₀*x) ⁻¹' U :=
mul_left' x₀ hU
lemma mul_right (x₀ : R) {U : set R} (hU : U ∈ B) :
∃ V ∈ B, V ⊆ (λ x, x*x₀) ⁻¹' U :=
mul_right' x₀ hU
/-- The topology associated to a ring filter basis.
It has the given basis as a basis of neighborhoods of zero. -/
def topology : topological_space R := B.to_add_group_filter_basis.topology
/-- If a ring is endowed with a topological structure coming from
a ring filter basis then it's a topological ring. -/
@[priority 100]
instance is_topological_ring {R : Type u} [ring R] (B : ring_filter_basis R) :
@topological_ring R B.topology _ :=
begin
let B' := B.to_add_group_filter_basis,
letI := B'.topology,
have basis := B'.nhds_zero_has_basis,
have basis' := basis.prod basis,
haveI := B'.is_topological_add_group,
apply topological_ring.of_add_group_of_nhds_zero,
{ rw basis'.tendsto_iff basis,
suffices : ∀ U ∈ B', ∃ V W, (V ∈ B' ∧ W ∈ B') ∧ ∀ a b, a ∈ V → b ∈ W → a * b ∈ U, by simpa,
intros U U_in,
rcases B.mul U_in with ⟨V, V_in, hV⟩,
use [V, V, V_in, V_in],
intros a b a_in b_in,
exact hV ⟨a, b, a_in, b_in, rfl⟩ },
{ intro x₀,
rw basis.tendsto_iff basis,
intros U,
simpa using B.mul_left x₀ },
{ intro x₀,
rw basis.tendsto_iff basis,
intros U,
simpa using B.mul_right x₀ },
end
end ring_filter_basis
/-- A `module_filter_basis` on a module is a `filter_basis` satisfying some additional axioms.
Example : if `M` is a topological module then the neighbourhoods of zero are a
`module_filter_basis`. Conversely given a `module_filter_basis` one can define a topology
compatible with the module structure on `M`. -/
structure module_filter_basis (R M : Type*) [comm_ring R] [topological_space R]
[add_comm_group M] [module R M] extends add_group_filter_basis M :=
(smul' : ∀ {U}, U ∈ sets → ∃ (V ∈ 𝓝 (0 : R)) (W ∈ sets), V • W ⊆ U)
(smul_left' : ∀ (x₀ : R) {U}, U ∈ sets → ∃ V ∈ sets, V ⊆ (λ x, x₀ • x) ⁻¹' U)
(smul_right' : ∀ (m₀ : M) {U}, U ∈ sets → ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 (0 : R), x • m₀ ∈ U)
namespace module_filter_basis
variables {R M : Type*} [comm_ring R] [topological_space R]
[add_comm_group M] [module R M] (B : module_filter_basis R M)
instance group_filter_basis.has_mem : has_mem (set M) (module_filter_basis R M) :=
⟨λ s B, s ∈ B.sets⟩
lemma smul {U : set M} (hU : U ∈ B) : ∃ (V ∈ 𝓝 (0 : R)) (W ∈ B), V • W ⊆ U :=
B.smul' hU
lemma smul_left (x₀ : R) {U : set M} (hU : U ∈ B) : ∃ V ∈ B, V ⊆ (λ x, x₀ • x) ⁻¹' U :=
B.smul_left' x₀ hU
lemma smul_right (m₀ : M) {U : set M} (hU : U ∈ B) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 (0 : R), x • m₀ ∈ U :=
B.smul_right' m₀ hU
/-- If `R` is discrete then the trivial additive group filter basis on any `R`-module is a
module filter basis. -/
instance [discrete_topology R] : inhabited (module_filter_basis R M) :=
⟨{ smul' := begin
rintro U (h : U ∈ {{(0 : M)}}),
rw mem_singleton_iff at h,
use [univ, univ_mem, {0}, rfl],
rintros a ⟨x, m, -, hm, rfl⟩,
simp [mem_singleton_iff.1 hm, h]
end,
smul_left' := begin
rintro x₀ U (h : U ∈ {{(0 : M)}}),
rw mem_singleton_iff at h,
use [{0}, rfl],
simp [h]
end,
smul_right' := begin
rintro m₀ U (h : U ∈ {{(0 : M)}}),
rw mem_singleton_iff at h,
simp [h, nhds_discrete]
end,
..show add_group_filter_basis M, from default }⟩
/-- The topology associated to a module filter basis on a module over a topological ring.
It has the given basis as a basis of neighborhoods of zero. -/
def topology : topological_space M := B.to_add_group_filter_basis.topology
/-- The topology associated to a module filter basis on a module over a topological ring.
It has the given basis as a basis of neighborhoods of zero. This version gets the ring
topology by unification instead of type class inference. -/
def topology' {R M : Type*} [comm_ring R] {tR : topological_space R}
[add_comm_group M] [module R M] (B : module_filter_basis R M) : topological_space M :=
B.to_add_group_filter_basis.topology
/-- If a module is endowed with a topological structure coming from
a module filter basis then it's a topological module. -/
@[priority 100]
instance has_continuous_smul [topological_ring R] :
@has_continuous_smul R M _ _ B.topology :=
begin
let B' := B.to_add_group_filter_basis,
letI := B'.topology,
have basis := B'.nhds_zero_has_basis,
haveI := B'.is_topological_add_group,
apply has_continuous_smul.of_nhds_zero,
{ rw basis.tendsto_right_iff,
intros U U_in,
rcases B.smul U_in with ⟨V, V_in, W, W_in, H⟩,
apply mem_of_superset (prod_mem_prod V_in $ B'.mem_nhds_zero W_in),
rintros ⟨v, w⟩ ⟨v_in : v ∈ V, w_in : w ∈ W⟩,
exact H (set.mem_smul_of_mem v_in w_in) },
{ intro m₀,
rw basis.tendsto_right_iff,
intros U U_in,
exact B.smul_right m₀ U_in },
{ intro x₀,
rw basis.tendsto_right_iff,
intros U U_in,
rcases B.smul_left x₀ U_in with ⟨V, V_in, hV⟩,
exact mem_of_superset (B'.mem_nhds_zero V_in) hV },
end
/-- Build a module filter basis from compatible ring and additive group filter bases. -/
def of_bases {R M : Type*} [comm_ring R]
[add_comm_group M] [module R M] (BR : ring_filter_basis R) (BM : add_group_filter_basis M)
(smul : ∀ {U}, U ∈ BM → ∃ (V ∈ BR) (W ∈ BM), V • W ⊆ U)
(smul_left : ∀ (x₀ : R) {U}, U ∈ BM → ∃ V ∈ BM, V ⊆ (λ x, x₀ • x) ⁻¹' U)
(smul_right : ∀ (m₀ : M) {U}, U ∈ BM → ∃ V ∈ BR, V ⊆ (λ x, x • m₀) ⁻¹' U) :
@module_filter_basis R M _ BR.topology _ _ :=
{ smul' := begin
intros U U_in,
rcases smul U_in with ⟨V, V_in, W, W_in, H⟩,
exact ⟨V, BR.to_add_group_filter_basis.mem_nhds_zero V_in, W, W_in, H⟩
end,
smul_left' := smul_left,
smul_right' := begin
intros m₀ U U_in,
rcases smul_right m₀ U_in with ⟨V, V_in, H⟩,
exact mem_of_superset (BR.to_add_group_filter_basis.mem_nhds_zero V_in) H
end,
..BM }
end module_filter_basis
|
4febb45df3c90922a96e5cdacd0e55cf2648c8d3 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /src/Lean/Compiler/LCNF/ToExpr.lean | 9abc4fb15d07f8f1992de3bd50bcab240e09cb23 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,928 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Compiler.LCNF.Basic
namespace Lean.Compiler.LCNF
namespace ToExpr
private abbrev LevelMap := FVarIdMap Nat
private def _root_.Lean.FVarId.toExpr (offset : Nat) (m : LevelMap) (fvarId : FVarId) : Expr :=
match m.find? fvarId with
| some level => .bvar (offset - level - 1)
| none => .fvar fvarId
private def _root_.Lean.Expr.abstract' (offset : Nat) (m : LevelMap) (e : Expr) : Expr :=
go offset e
where
go (o : Nat) (e : Expr) : Expr :=
match e with
| .fvar fvarId => fvarId.toExpr o m
| .lit .. | .const .. | .sort .. | .mvar .. | .bvar .. => e
| .app f a => .app (go o f) (go o a)
| .mdata k b => .mdata k (go o b)
| .proj s i b => .proj s i (go o b)
| .forallE n d b bi => .forallE n (go o d) (go (o+1) b) bi
| .lam n d b bi => .lam n (go o d) (go (o+1) b) bi
| .letE n t v b nd => .letE n (go o t) (go o v) (go (o+1) b) nd
abbrev ToExprM := ReaderT Nat $ StateM LevelMap
abbrev mkLambdaM (params : Array Param) (e : Expr) : ToExprM Expr :=
return go (← read) (← get) params.size e
where
go (offset : Nat) (m : LevelMap) (i : Nat) (e : Expr) : Expr :=
if i > 0 then
let param := params[i-1]!
let domain := param.type.abstract' (offset - 1) m
go (offset - 1) m (i - 1) (.lam param.binderName domain e .default)
else
e
private abbrev _root_.Lean.FVarId.toExprM (fvarId : FVarId) : ToExprM Expr :=
return fvarId.toExpr (← read) (← get)
abbrev abstractM (e : Expr) : ToExprM Expr :=
return e.abstract' (← read) (← get)
@[inline] def withFVar (fvarId : FVarId) (k : ToExprM α) : ToExprM α := do
let offset ← read
modify fun s => s.insert fvarId offset
withReader (·+1) k
@[inline] partial def withParams (params : Array Param) (k : ToExprM α) : ToExprM α :=
go 0
where
@[specialize] go (i : Nat) : ToExprM α := do
if h : i < params.size then
withFVar params[i].fvarId (go (i+1))
else
k
@[inline] def run (x : ToExprM α) (offset : Nat := 0) (levelMap : LevelMap := {}) : α :=
x |>.run offset |>.run' levelMap
@[inline] def run' (x : ToExprM α) (xs : Array FVarId) : α :=
let map := xs.foldl (init := {}) fun map x => map.insert x map.size
run x xs.size map
end ToExpr
open ToExpr
private def Arg.toExprM (arg : Arg) : ToExprM Expr :=
return arg.toExpr.abstract' (← read) (← get)
mutual
partial def FunDeclCore.toExprM (decl : FunDecl) : ToExprM Expr :=
withParams decl.params do mkLambdaM decl.params (← decl.value.toExprM)
partial def Code.toExprM (code : Code) : ToExprM Expr := do
match code with
| .let decl k =>
let type ← abstractM decl.type
let value ← abstractM decl.value.toExpr
let body ← withFVar decl.fvarId k.toExprM
return .letE decl.binderName type value body true
| .fun decl k | .jp decl k =>
let type ← abstractM decl.type
let value ← decl.toExprM
let body ← withFVar decl.fvarId k.toExprM
return .letE decl.binderName type value body true
| .return fvarId => fvarId.toExprM
| .jmp fvarId args => return mkAppN (← fvarId.toExprM) (← args.mapM Arg.toExprM)
| .unreach type => return mkApp (mkConst ``lcUnreachable) (← abstractM type)
| .cases c =>
let alts ← c.alts.mapM fun
| .alt _ params k => withParams params do mkLambdaM params (← k.toExprM)
| .default k => k.toExprM
return mkAppN (mkConst `cases) (#[← c.discr.toExprM] ++ alts)
end
def Code.toExpr (code : Code) (xs : Array FVarId := #[]) : Expr :=
run' code.toExprM xs
def FunDeclCore.toExpr (decl : FunDecl) (xs : Array FVarId := #[]) : Expr :=
run' decl.toExprM xs
def Decl.toExpr (decl : Decl) : Expr :=
run do withParams decl.params do mkLambdaM decl.params (← decl.value.toExprM)
end Lean.Compiler.LCNF
|
f23d5427d48d4d6a63e8488fab3e7d2940186082 | 724b37749f589c3ad15e106a1a0610240659c140 | /fingerTree.lean | e4dd06223e2deae1c52563ba7b1ec4495369fa94 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vtec234/lean4-bits | 3865b6f11edbcdf82ea3a0a89d6ac8046fc41ef9 | 0d9340285b208553e0e0b31acfb2c9097ff4546a | refs/heads/master | 1,688,039,348,308 | 1,627,783,881,000 | 1,627,784,253,000 | 391,503,122 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,767 | lean | /-! https://www.cs.tufts.edu/~nr/cs257/archive/koen-claessen/finger-trees.pdf -/
/-! Idea: normal list. -/
namespace Finger₀
inductive Seq α where
| nil : Seq α
| cons : α → Seq α → Seq α
deriving Inhabited
variable [Inhabited α]
def Seq.head : Seq α → α
| cons a as => a
| nil => panic! "no last"
def Seq.last : Seq α → α
| cons a nil => a
| cons a as => last as -- linear time :(
| nil => panic! "no last"
end Finger₀
/-! Idea: constant-time head/last via a symmetric representation. -/
namespace Finger₁
inductive Seq α where
| nil : Seq α
| unit : α → Seq α
| more : α → Seq α → α → Seq α
deriving Inhabited
variable [Inhabited α]
def Seq.head : Seq α → α
| unit h => h
| more h .. => h
| nil => panic! "no head"
def Seq.last : Seq α → α
| unit l => l
| more _ _ l => l
| nil => panic! "no last"
def Seq.cons (h : α) : Seq α → Seq α
| unit l => more h nil l
| more a as l => more h (cons a as) l -- now cons is linear
| nil => unit h
def Seq.snoc : Seq α → α → Seq α
| unit h, l => more h nil l
| more h as a, l => more h (snoc as a) l
| nil, l => unit l
def Seq.tail : Seq α → Seq α
| unit _ => nil
| more _ as l => more as.head as.tail l
| nil => panic! "no tail"
end Finger₁
/-! Idea: logarithmic complexity by recursively doubling the amount of values per node. -/
namespace Finger₂
inductive Seq : Type u → Type (u + 1) where
| nil : Seq α
| unit : α → Seq α
| more : α → Seq (α × α) → α → Seq α
instance : Inhabited (Seq α) := ⟨Seq.nil⟩
def Seq.cons (h : α) : Seq α → Seq α
| nil => unit h
| unit l => more h nil l
| more a as l => more h sorry l -- now we can't represent sequences of odd length
end Finger₂
/-! Idea: represent odd lengths with one/two elements in head/last positions. -/
namespace Finger₃
inductive Some α where
| one : α → Some α
| two : α → α → Some α
inductive Seq : Type u → Type (u + 1) where
| nil : Seq α
| unit : α → Seq α
| more : Some α → Seq (α × α) → Some α → Seq α
instance : Inhabited (Seq α) := ⟨Seq.nil⟩
variable [Inhabited α]
open Some
def Seq.head : Seq α → α
| unit h => h
| more (one h) .. => h
| more (two h _) .. => h
| nil => panic! "no head"
def Seq.last : Seq α → α
| unit l => l
| more _ _ (one l) => l
| more _ _ (two _ l) => l
| nil => panic! "no last"
def Seq.cons {α : Type u} (h : α) : Seq α → Seq α
| nil => unit h
| unit l => more (one h) nil (one l)
| more (one a) as l => more (two h a) as l
| more (two a a') as l => more (one h) (cons (a, a') as) l
partial def Seq.tail {α : Type u} [Inhabited α] : Seq α → Seq α
| unit _ => nil
| more (one _) as l => moreSnoc as l
| more (two _ h) as l => more (one h) as l
| nil => panic! "no tail"
where
moreSnoc : Seq (α × α) → Some α → Seq α
| nil, (one a) => unit a
| nil, (two h l) => more (one h) nil (one l)
| as, ls =>
let (h, a) := as.head
more (two h a) as.tail ls
-- now we can't implement append sub-linearly because we'd need to destruct
-- all pairs in `more _ as _` when odd-length sequences appear in certain places
end Finger₃
/-! Idea: also allow the log-recursion base to be odd or even. -/
namespace Finger₄
inductive Some α where
| one (a : α)
| two (a b : α)
deriving Inhabited
inductive Tuple α where
| pair (a b : α)
| triple (a b c : α)
deriving Inhabited
inductive Seq : Type u → Type (u + 1) where
| nil : Seq α
| unit : α → Seq α
| more : Some α → Seq (Tuple α) → Some α → Seq α
instance : Inhabited (Seq α) := ⟨Seq.nil⟩
variable [Inhabited α]
open Some Tuple
def Seq.head : Seq α → α
| unit h => h
| more (one h) .. => h
| more (two h _) .. => h
| nil => panic! "no head"
def Seq.last : Seq α → α
| unit l => l
| more _ _ (one l) => l
| more _ _ (two _ l) => l
| nil => panic! "no last"
def Seq.cons {α : Type u} (h : α) : Seq α → Seq α
| nil => unit h
| unit l => more (one h) nil (one l)
| more (one a) as l => more (two h a) as l
| more (two a a') as l => more (one h) (cons (pair a a') as) l
def Seq.snoc {α : Type u} (s : Seq α) (l : α) : Seq α :=
match s with
| nil => unit l
| unit h => more (one h) nil (one l)
| more hs as (one a) => more hs as (two a l)
| more hs as (two a' a) => more hs (snoc as (pair a' a)) (one l)
partial def Seq.tail {α : Type u} [Inhabited α] : Seq α → Seq α
| unit _ => nil
| more (one _) as l => moreSnoc as l
| more (two _ h) as l => more (one h) as l
| nil => panic! "no tail"
where
moreSnoc : Seq (Tuple α) → Some α → Seq α
| nil, (one a) => unit a
| nil, (two h l) => more (one h) nil (one l)
| as, ls => match as.head with
| pair h a => more (two h a) as.tail ls
| triple h a b => more (one h) (map1 chop as) ls
map1 {α : Type u} (f : α → α) : Seq α → Seq α
| nil => nil
| unit h => unit (f h)
| more (one h) as ls => more (one $ f h) as ls
| more (two h a) as ls => more (two (f h) a) as ls
chop : Tuple α → Tuple α
| triple a b c => pair b c
| pair a b => unreachable!
def Some.toList : Some α → List α
| one a => [a]
| two a b => [a, b]
private def toTuples : List α → List (Tuple α)
| [] => []
| [a, b] => [pair a b]
| [a, b, c] => [triple a b c]
| [a, b, c, d] => [pair a b, pair c d]
| [a, b, c, d, e] => [triple a b c, pair d e]
| [a, b, c, d, e, f] => [triple a b c, triple d e f]
| _ => unreachable!
private def Seq.glue {α : Type u} : Seq α → List α → Seq α → Seq α
| nil, as, s₂ => as.foldr Seq.cons s₂
| s₁, as, nil => as.foldl Seq.snoc s₁
| unit h, as, s₂ => (h :: as).foldr Seq.cons s₂
| s₁, as, unit l => (as ++ [l]).foldl Seq.snoc s₁
| more hs₁ s₁ ls₁, as, more hs₂ s₂ ls₂ =>
more hs₁ (glue s₁ (toTuples (ls₁.toList ++ as ++ hs₂.toList)) s₂) ls₂
def append : Seq α → Seq α → Seq α
| as, bs => Seq.glue as [] bs
end Finger₄
/-! Idea: add a *third* possible head/last length so that there are cases
in which neither cons nor tail needs to recurse, resulting in amortized
constant-time complexity. -/
namespace Finger₅
inductive Some α where
| one (a : α)
| two (a b : α)
| three (a b c : α)
deriving Inhabited
inductive Tuple α where
| pair (a b : α)
| triple (a b c : α)
deriving Inhabited
inductive Seq : Type u → Type (u + 1) where
| nil : Seq α
| unit : α → Seq α
| more : Some α → Seq (Tuple α) → Some α → Seq α
instance : Inhabited (Seq α) := ⟨Seq.nil⟩
variable [Inhabited α]
open Some Tuple
def Seq.head : Seq α → α
| unit h => h
| more (one h) .. => h
| more (two h ..) .. => h
| more (three h ..) .. => h
| nil => panic! "no head"
def Seq.last : Seq α → α
| unit l => l
| more _ _ (one l) => l
| more _ _ (two _ l) => l
| more _ _ (three _ _ l) => l
| nil => panic! "no last"
def Seq.cons {α : Type u} (h : α) : Seq α → Seq α
| nil => unit h
| unit l => more (one h) nil (one l)
| more (one a) as l => more (two h a) as l
| more (two a b) as l => more (three h a b) as l
| more (three a b c) as l => more (two h a) (cons (pair b c) as) l
def Seq.snoc {α : Type u} (s : Seq α) (l : α) : Seq α :=
match s with
| nil => unit l
| unit h => more (one h) nil (one l)
| more hs as (one a) => more hs as (two a l)
| more hs as (two a b) => more hs as (three a b l)
| more hs as (three a b c) => more hs (snoc as (pair a b)) (two c l)
partial def Seq.tail {α : Type u} [Inhabited α] : Seq α → Seq α
| unit _ => nil
| more (one _) as l => moreSnoc as l
| more (two _ h) as l => more (one h) as l
| more (three _ h a) as l => more (two h a) as l
| nil => panic! "no tail"
where
moreSnoc : Seq (Tuple α) → Some α → Seq α
| nil, (one a) => unit a
| nil, (two h l) => more (one h) nil (one l)
| nil, (three h a l) => more (one h) nil (two a l)
| as, ls => match as.head with
| pair h a => more (two h a) as.tail ls
| triple h a b => more (one h) (map1 chop as) ls
map1 {α : Type u} (f : α → α) : Seq α → Seq α
| nil => nil
| unit h => unit (f h)
| more (one h) as ls => more (one $ f h) as ls
| more (two h a) as ls => more (two (f h) a) as ls
| more (three h a b) as ls => more (three (f h) a b) as ls
chop : Tuple α → Tuple α
| triple a b c => pair b c
| pair a b => unreachable!
def Some.toList : Some α → List α
| one a => [a]
| two a b => [a, b]
| three a b c => [a, b, c]
-- TODO(WN): unrolled but unclear if needed
-- TODO(WN): subtype proofs of in.length ∈ [2,9] and out.length ∈ [1,3]
private def toTuples : List α → List (Tuple α)
| [] => []
| [a, b] => [pair a b]
| [a, b, c] => [triple a b c]
| [a, b, c, d] => [pair a b, pair c d]
| [a, b, c, d, e] => [triple a b c, pair d e]
| [a, b, c, d, e, f] => [triple a b c, triple d e f]
| [a, b, c, d, e, f, g] => [triple a b c, pair d e, pair f g]
| [a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h] => [triple a b c, triple d e f, pair g h]
| [a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i] => [triple a b c, triple d e f, triple g h i]
| _ => unreachable!
private def Seq.glue {α : Type u} : Seq α → List α → Seq α → Seq α
| nil, as, s₂ => as.foldr Seq.cons s₂
| s₁, as, nil => as.foldl Seq.snoc s₁
| unit h, as, s₂ => (h :: as).foldr Seq.cons s₂
| s₁, as, unit l => (as ++ [l]).foldl Seq.snoc s₁
| more hs₁ s₁ ls₁, as, more hs₂ s₂ ls₂ =>
more hs₁ (glue s₁ (toTuples (ls₁.toList ++ as ++ hs₂.toList)) s₂) ls₂
instance : Append (Seq α) :=
⟨fun as bs => Seq.glue as [] bs⟩
end Finger₅
|
37c0d34572583296d94ababfa103b3fe4885300f | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /src/tactic/equiv_rw.lean | 0617d9d45f1c31706c154c5eb1dcbf1f9a29b14a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,096 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import tactic.simp_result
import tactic.clear
import control.equiv_functor.instances
/-!
# The `equiv_rw` tactic transports goals or hypotheses along equivalences.
The basic syntax is `equiv_rw e`, where `e : α ≃ β` is an equivalence.
This will try to replace occurrences of `α` in the goal with `β`, for example
transforming
* `⊢ α` to `⊢ β`,
* `⊢ option α` to `⊢ option β`
* `⊢ {a // P}` to `{b // P (⇑(equiv.symm e) b)}`
The tactic can also be used to rewrite hypotheses, using the syntax `equiv_rw e at h`.
## Implementation details
The main internal function is `equiv_rw_type e t`,
which attempts to turn an expression `e : α ≃ β` into a new equivalence with left hand side `t`.
As an example, with `t = option α`, it will generate `functor.map_equiv option e`.
This is achieved by generating a new synthetic goal `%%t ≃ _`,
and calling `solve_by_elim` with an appropriate set of congruence lemmas.
To avoid having to specify the relevant congruence lemmas by hand,
we mostly rely on `equiv_functor.map_equiv` and `bifunctor.map_equiv`
along with some structural congruence lemmas such as
* `equiv.arrow_congr'`,
* `equiv.subtype_equiv_of_subtype'`,
* `equiv.sigma_congr_left'`, and
* `equiv.Pi_congr_left'`.
The main `equiv_rw` function, when operating on the goal, simply generates a new equivalence `e'`
with left hand side matching the target, and calls `apply e'.inv_fun`.
When operating on a hypothesis `x : α`, we introduce a new fact `h : x = e.symm (e x)`, revert this,
and then attempt to `generalize`, replacing all occurrences of `e x` with a new constant `y`, before
`intro`ing and `subst`ing `h`, and renaming `y` back to `x`.
## Future improvements
In a future PR I anticipate that `derive equiv_functor` should work on many examples,
(internally using `transport`, which is in turn based on `equiv_rw`)
and we can incrementally bootstrap the strength of `equiv_rw`.
An ambitious project might be to add `equiv_rw!`,
a tactic which, when failing to find appropriate `equiv_functor` instances,
attempts to `derive` them on the spot.
For now `equiv_rw` is entirely based on `equiv`,
but the framework can readily be generalised to also work with other types of equivalences,
for example specific notations such as ring equivalence (`≃+*`),
or general categorical isomorphisms (`≅`).
This will allow us to transport across more general types of equivalences,
but this will wait for another subsequent PR.
-/
namespace tactic
/-- A list of lemmas used for constructing congruence equivalences. -/
-- Although this looks 'hard-coded', in fact the lemma `equiv_functor.map_equiv`
-- allows us to extend `equiv_rw` simply by constructing new instance so `equiv_functor`.
-- TODO: We should also use `category_theory.functorial` and `category_theory.hygienic` instances.
-- (example goal: we could rewrite along an isomorphism of rings (either as `R ≅ S` or `R ≃+* S`)
-- and turn an `x : mv_polynomial σ R` into an `x : mv_polynomial σ S`.).
meta def equiv_congr_lemmas : list (tactic expr) :=
[ `equiv.of_iff,
-- TODO decide what to do with this; it's an equiv_bifunctor?
`equiv.equiv_congr,
-- The function arrow is technically a bifunctor `Typeᵒᵖ → Type → Type`,
-- but the pattern matcher will never see this.
`equiv.arrow_congr',
-- Allow rewriting in subtypes:
`equiv.subtype_equiv_of_subtype',
-- Allow rewriting in the first component of a sigma-type:
`equiv.sigma_congr_left',
-- Allow rewriting ∀s:
-- (You might think that repeated application of `equiv.forall_congr'
-- would handle the higher arity cases, but unfortunately unification is not clever enough.)
`equiv.forall₃_congr',
`equiv.forall₂_congr',
`equiv.forall_congr',
-- Allow rewriting in argument of Pi types:
`equiv.Pi_congr_left',
-- Handles `sum` and `prod`, and many others:
`bifunctor.map_equiv,
-- Handles `list`, `option`, `unique`, and many others:
`equiv_functor.map_equiv,
-- We have to filter results to ensure we don't cheat and use exclusively
-- `equiv.refl` and `iff.refl`!
`equiv.refl,
`iff.refl
].map (λ n, mk_const n)
declare_trace equiv_rw_type
/--
Configuration structure for `equiv_rw`.
* `max_depth` bounds the search depth for equivalences to rewrite along.
The default value is 10.
(e.g., if you're rewriting along `e : α ≃ β`, and `max_depth := 2`,
you can rewrite `option (option α))` but not `option (option (option α))`.
-/
meta structure equiv_rw_cfg :=
(max_depth : ℕ := 10)
/--
Implementation of `equiv_rw_type`, using `solve_by_elim`.
Expects a goal of the form `t ≃ _`,
and tries to solve it using `eq : α ≃ β` and congruence lemmas.
-/
meta def equiv_rw_type_core (eq : expr) (cfg : equiv_rw_cfg) : tactic unit :=
do
/-
We now call `solve_by_elim` to try to generate the requested equivalence.
There are a few subtleties!
* We make sure that `eq` is the first lemma, so it is applied whenever possible.
* In `equiv_congr_lemmas`, we put `equiv.refl` last so it is only used when it is not possible
to descend further.
* Since some congruence lemmas generate subgoals with `∀` statements,
we use the `pre_apply` subtactic of `solve_by_elim` to preprocess each new goal with `intros`.
-/
solve_by_elim
{ use_symmetry := false,
use_exfalso := false,
lemma_thunks := some (pure eq :: equiv_congr_lemmas),
ctx_thunk := pure [],
max_depth := cfg.max_depth,
-- Subgoals may contain function types,
-- and we want to continue trying to construct equivalences after the binders.
pre_apply := tactic.intros >> skip,
backtrack_all_goals := tt,
-- If solve_by_elim gets stuck, make sure it isn't because there's a later `≃` or `↔` goal
-- that we should still attempt.
discharger :=
`[success_if_fail { match_target _ ≃ _ }] >> `[success_if_fail { match_target _ ↔ _ }] >>
(`[show _ ≃ _] <|> `[show _ ↔ _]) <|>
trace_if_enabled `equiv_rw_type "Failed, no congruence lemma applied!" >> failed,
-- We use the `accept` tactic in `solve_by_elim` to provide tracing.
accept := λ goals, lock_tactic_state (do
when_tracing `equiv_rw_type (do
goals.mmap pp >>= λ goals, trace format!"So far, we've built: {goals}"),
done <|>
when_tracing `equiv_rw_type (do
gs ← get_goals,
gs ← gs.mmap (λ g, infer_type g >>= pp),
trace format!"Attempting to adapt to {gs}")) }
/--
`equiv_rw_type e t` rewrites the type `t` using the equivalence `e : α ≃ β`,
returning a new equivalence `t ≃ t'`.
-/
meta def equiv_rw_type (eqv : expr) (ty : expr) (cfg : equiv_rw_cfg) : tactic expr :=
do
when_tracing `equiv_rw_type (do
ty_pp ← pp ty,
eqv_pp ← pp eqv,
eqv_ty_pp ← infer_type eqv >>= pp,
trace format!"Attempting to rewrite the type `{ty_pp}` using `{eqv_pp} : {eqv_ty_pp}`."),
`(_ ≃ _) ← infer_type eqv | fail format!"{eqv} must be an `equiv`",
-- We prepare a synthetic goal of type `(%%ty ≃ _)`, for some placeholder right hand side.
equiv_ty ← to_expr ``(%%ty ≃ _),
-- Now call `equiv_rw_type_core`.
new_eqv ← prod.snd <$> (solve_aux equiv_ty $ equiv_rw_type_core eqv cfg),
-- Check that we actually used the equivalence `eq`
-- (`equiv_rw_type_core` will always find `equiv.refl`,
-- but hopefully only after all other possibilities)
new_eqv ← instantiate_mvars new_eqv,
-- We previously had `guard (eqv.occurs new_eqv)` here, but `kdepends_on` is more reliable.
kdepends_on new_eqv eqv >>= guardb <|> (do
eqv_pp ← pp eqv,
ty_pp ← pp ty,
fail format!"Could not construct an equivalence from {eqv_pp} of the form: {ty_pp} ≃ _"),
-- Finally we simplify the resulting equivalence,
-- to compress away some `map_equiv equiv.refl` subexpressions.
prod.fst <$> new_eqv.simp {fail_if_unchanged := ff}
mk_simp_attribute equiv_rw_simp "The simpset `equiv_rw_simp` is used by the tactic `equiv_rw` to
simplify applications of equivalences and their inverses."
attribute [equiv_rw_simp] equiv.symm_symm equiv.apply_symm_apply equiv.symm_apply_apply
/--
Attempt to replace the hypothesis with name `x`
by transporting it along the equivalence in `e : α ≃ β`.
-/
meta def equiv_rw_hyp (x : name) (e : expr) (cfg : equiv_rw_cfg := {}) : tactic unit :=
-- We call `dsimp_result` to perform the beta redex introduced by `revert`
dsimp_result (do
x' ← get_local x,
x_ty ← infer_type x',
-- Adapt `e` to an equivalence with left-hand-side `x_ty`.
e ← equiv_rw_type e x_ty cfg,
eq ← to_expr ``(%%x' = equiv.symm %%e (equiv.to_fun %%e %%x')),
prf ← to_expr ``((equiv.symm_apply_apply %%e %%x').symm),
h ← note_anon eq prf,
-- Revert the new hypothesis, so it is also part of the goal.
revert h,
ex ← to_expr ``(equiv.to_fun %%e %%x'),
-- Now call `generalize`,
-- attempting to replace all occurrences of `e x`,
-- calling it for now `j : β`, with `k : x = e.symm j`.
generalize ex (by apply_opt_param) transparency.none,
-- Reintroduce `x` (now of type `b`), and the hypothesis `h`.
intro x,
h ← intro1,
-- Finally, if we're working on properties, substitute along `h`, then do some cleanup,
-- and if we're working on data, just throw out the old `x`.
b ← target >>= is_prop,
if b then do
subst h,
`[try { simp only with equiv_rw_simp }]
else
-- We may need to unfreeze `x` before we can `clear` it.
unfreezing_hyp x' (clear' tt [x']) <|> fail
format!"equiv_rw expected to be able to clear the original hypothesis {x}, but couldn't.",
skip)
{fail_if_unchanged := ff} tt -- call `dsimp_result` with `no_defaults := tt`.
/-- Rewrite the goal using an equiv `e`. -/
meta def equiv_rw_target (e : expr) (cfg : equiv_rw_cfg := {}) : tactic unit :=
do
t ← target,
e ← equiv_rw_type e t cfg,
s ← to_expr ``(equiv.inv_fun %%e),
tactic.eapply s,
skip
end tactic
namespace tactic.interactive
open lean.parser
open interactive interactive.types
open tactic
local postfix `?`:9001 := optional
/--
`equiv_rw e at h`, where `h : α` is a hypothesis, and `e : α ≃ β`,
will attempt to transport `h` along `e`, producing a new hypothesis `h : β`,
with all occurrences of `h` in other hypotheses and the goal replaced with `e.symm h`.
`equiv_rw e` will attempt to transport the goal along an equivalence `e : α ≃ β`.
In its minimal form it replaces the goal `⊢ α` with `⊢ β` by calling `apply e.inv_fun`.
`equiv_rw` will also try rewriting under (equiv_)functors, so can turn
a hypothesis `h : list α` into `h : list β` or
a goal `⊢ unique α` into `⊢ unique β`.
The maximum search depth for rewriting in subexpressions is controlled by
`equiv_rw e {max_depth := n}`.
-/
meta def equiv_rw (e : parse texpr) (loc : parse $ (tk "at" *> ident)?) (cfg : equiv_rw_cfg := {}) :
itactic :=
do e ← to_expr e,
match loc with
| (some hyp) := equiv_rw_hyp hyp e cfg
| none := equiv_rw_target e cfg
end
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "equiv_rw",
category := doc_category.tactic,
decl_names := [`tactic.interactive.equiv_rw],
tags := ["rewriting", "equiv", "transport"] }
/--
Solve a goal of the form `t ≃ _`,
by constructing an equivalence from `e : α ≃ β`.
This is the same equivalence that `equiv_rw` would use to rewrite a term of type `t`.
A typical usage might be:
```
have e' : option α ≃ option β := by equiv_rw_type e
```
-/
meta def equiv_rw_type (e : parse texpr) (cfg : equiv_rw_cfg := {}) : itactic :=
do
`(%%t ≃ _) ← target | fail "`equiv_rw_type` solves goals of the form `t ≃ _`.",
e ← to_expr e,
tactic.equiv_rw_type e t cfg >>= tactic.exact
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "equiv_rw_type",
category := doc_category.tactic,
decl_names := [`tactic.interactive.equiv_rw_type],
tags := ["rewriting", "equiv", "transport"] }
end tactic.interactive
|
1dd93c954d940ddbe85bc917769098c396695879 | cf39355caa609c0f33405126beee2739aa3cb77e | /tests/lean/elab8.lean | f53fed16db68d71d3ba2871d4c896544e0b105b8 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/lean | 12b87f69d92e614daea8bcc9d4de9a9ace089d0e | cce7990ea86a78bdb383e38ed7f9b5ba93c60ce0 | refs/heads/master | 1,687,508,156,644 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 169,960,991 | 457 | 107 | Apache-2.0 | 1,686,744,372,000 | 1,549,790,268,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 276 | lean | set_option pp.notation false
set_option pp.implicit true
set_option pp.numerals false
set_option pp.binder_types true
variables (A : Type*) [has_add A] [has_one A] [has_lt A] (a : A)
#check a + 1
#check λ (H : a > 1), a + 1
#check λ (H₁ : a > 1) (H₂ : a < 5), a + 1
|
88e4ea126fbdaee60c4c13ff5592ba34b461b022 | dd4e652c749fea9ac77e404005cb3470e5f75469 | /src/eigenvectors/complex_adjoint.lean | 3be374cac8d0417eaa878c467592843b0b5e0334 | [] | no_license | skbaek/cvx | e32822ad5943541539966a37dee162b0a5495f55 | c50c790c9116f9fac8dfe742903a62bdd7292c15 | refs/heads/master | 1,623,803,010,339 | 1,618,058,958,000 | 1,618,058,958,000 | 176,293,135 | 3 | 2 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,352 | lean | import eigenvectors.hermitian_form
-- import missing_mathlib.linear_algebra.basic
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical
variables {R : Type*} {M : Type*} [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
variables {I : R ≃+* Rᵒᵖ} {H : hermitian_form R M I}
namespace linear_map
def has_adjoint (F G : M →ₗ[R] M) (H : hermitian_form R M I) : Prop :=
∀ x y, H (F x) y = H x (G y)
lemma has_adjoint_def {F G : M →ₗ[R] M} (hG : F.has_adjoint G H) :
∀ x y, H (F x) y = H x (G y) := hG
lemma has_adjoint_symm {F G : M →ₗ[R] M} :
F.has_adjoint G H ↔ G.has_adjoint F H :=
begin
unfold has_adjoint,
split,
repeat
{ intros h x y,
rw [←H.comm y _, ←H.comm _ x, h y x], }
end
lemma has_adjoint_unique_left {F F' G : M →ₗ[R] M}
(hF : has_adjoint F G) (hF' : has_adjoint F' G) : F = F' :=
begin
ext,
rw ←sub_eq_zero,
apply inner_product_space.definite,
simp only [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right],
simp [has_adjoint_def hF, has_adjoint_def hF']
end
lemma has_adjoint_unique_right {F G G' : V →ₗ[ℝ] V}
(hG : has_adjoint F G) (hG' : has_adjoint F G') : G = G' :=
begin
rw has_adjoint_symm at *,
apply has_adjoint_unique_left hG hG'
end
lemma has_adjoint_zero : has_adjoint (0 : V →ₗ[ℝ] V) 0 :=
by simp [has_adjoint, linear_map.zero_apply, inner_zero_left, inner_zero_right]
lemma has_adjoint_id : has_adjoint (id : V →ₗ[ℝ] V) id :=
by simp [has_adjoint, linear_map.id_apply]
lemma has_adjoint_smul {F G : V →ₗ[ℝ] V} (c : ℝ) :
has_adjoint F G → has_adjoint (c • F) (c • G) :=
by simp [has_adjoint, inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right] {contextual := tt}
lemma has_adjoint_neg {F G : V →ₗ[ℝ] V} :
has_adjoint F G → has_adjoint (- F) (- G) :=
begin
rw ← neg_one_smul _ F,
rw ← neg_one_smul _ G,
apply has_adjoint_smul (-1),
end
lemma has_adjoint_add {F G F' G' : V →ₗ[ℝ] V} :
has_adjoint F G → has_adjoint F' G' → has_adjoint (F + F') (G + G') :=
by simp [has_adjoint, inner_add_left, inner_add_right] {contextual := tt}
lemma has_adjoint_sub {F G F' G' : V →ₗ[ℝ] V} :
has_adjoint F G → has_adjoint F' G' → has_adjoint (F - F') (G - G') :=
by simp [has_adjoint, inner_add_left, inner_add_right] {contextual := tt}
def adjoint (F : V →ₗ[ℝ] V) : V →ₗ[ℝ] V :=
if h : ∃ G, has_adjoint F G then classical.some h else 0
lemma adjoint_of_has_adjoint {F G : V →ₗ[ℝ] V} (hF : has_adjoint F G) :
F.adjoint = G :=
begin
apply has_adjoint_unique_right _ hF,
rw [adjoint, dif_pos],
apply classical.some_spec ⟨G, hF⟩,
end
lemma has_adjoint_adjoint {F : V →ₗ[ℝ] V} (h : ∃ G, has_adjoint F G) :
has_adjoint F (adjoint F) :=
begin
rcases h with ⟨w, hw⟩,
rw adjoint_of_has_adjoint hw,
apply hw,
end
lemma inner_adjoint {F : V →ₗ[ℝ] V} (h : ∃ G, has_adjoint F G) :
∀ x y, inner (F x) y = inner x (F.adjoint y) :=
has_adjoint_def (has_adjoint_adjoint h)
lemma adjoint_adjoint {F : V →ₗ[ℝ] V} (h : ∃ G, has_adjoint F G) :
F.adjoint.adjoint = F :=
begin
rw adjoint_of_has_adjoint,
rw has_adjoint_symm,
apply has_adjoint_adjoint h,
end
lemma adjoint_zero : (0 : V →ₗ[ℝ] V).adjoint = 0 :=
adjoint_of_has_adjoint has_adjoint_zero
lemma adjoint_id : (id : V →ₗ[ℝ] V).adjoint = id :=
adjoint_of_has_adjoint has_adjoint_id
lemma adjoint_smul (c : ℝ) (F : V →ₗ[ℝ] V) (h : ∃ G, has_adjoint F G) :
(c • F).adjoint = c • F.adjoint :=
adjoint_of_has_adjoint (has_adjoint_smul c (has_adjoint_adjoint h))
lemma adjoint_neg (F : V →ₗ[ℝ] V) (h : ∃ G, has_adjoint F G) :
(- F).adjoint = - F.adjoint :=
adjoint_of_has_adjoint (has_adjoint_neg (has_adjoint_adjoint h))
lemma adjoint_add (F G : V →ₗ[ℝ] V)
(hF : ∃ F', has_adjoint F F') (hG : ∃ G', has_adjoint G G'):
(F + G).adjoint = F.adjoint + G.adjoint :=
adjoint_of_has_adjoint (has_adjoint_add (has_adjoint_adjoint hF) (has_adjoint_adjoint hG))
lemma adjoint_sub (F G : V →ₗ[ℝ] V)
(hF : ∃ F', has_adjoint F F') (hG : ∃ G', has_adjoint G G'):
(F - G).adjoint = F.adjoint - G.adjoint :=
adjoint_of_has_adjoint (has_adjoint_sub (has_adjoint_adjoint hF) (has_adjoint_adjoint hG))
def normal (F : V →ₗ[ℝ] V) : Prop :=
∃ G, has_adjoint F G ∧ F.comp G = G.comp F
lemma has_adjoint_of_normal {F : V →ₗ[ℝ] V} (h : normal F) :
∃ G, has_adjoint F G :=
begin
unfold normal at h,
rcases h with ⟨w, hw⟩,
use w,
apply hw.left,
end
lemma adjoint_comm_of_normal {F : V →ₗ[ℝ] V} (h : normal F) :
F.comp F.adjoint = F.adjoint.comp F :=
begin
unfold normal at h,
rcases h with ⟨w, hw⟩,
rw adjoint_of_has_adjoint hw.left,
apply hw.right,
end
lemma normal_adjoint_of_normal {F : V →ₗ[ℝ] V} (h : normal F) :
normal F.adjoint :=
begin
use F,
split,
{ rw has_adjoint_symm,
apply has_adjoint_adjoint (has_adjoint_of_normal h) },
{ rw adjoint_comm_of_normal h },
end
lemma normal_of_has_adjoint_self {F : V →ₗ[ℝ] V} (h : has_adjoint F F) :
normal F :=
⟨F, ⟨h, rfl⟩⟩
lemma normal_zero : normal (0 : V →ₗ[ℝ] V) :=
normal_of_has_adjoint_self has_adjoint_zero
lemma normal_id : normal (id : V →ₗ[ℝ] V) :=
normal_of_has_adjoint_self has_adjoint_id
lemma normal_smul_of_normal {F : V →ₗ[ℝ] V} (c : ℝ) (h : normal F) :
normal (c • F) :=
begin
rcases h with ⟨G, hG_adjoint, hG_comm⟩,
refine ⟨c • G, ⟨has_adjoint_smul c hG_adjoint, _⟩⟩,
simp only [comp_smul, smul_comp, hG_comm]
end
lemma normal_neg_of_normal {F : V →ₗ[ℝ] V} (h : normal F) :
normal (- F) :=
begin
rw ← neg_one_smul _ F,
apply normal_smul_of_normal (-1) h,
end
lemma normal_sub_algebra_map_of_normal
{F G : V →ₗ[ℝ] V} (c : ℝ) (hF : normal F) :
normal (F - algebra_map _ c) :=
begin
rcases hF with ⟨G, hG_adjoint, hG_comm⟩,
refine ⟨G - algebra_map _ c, ⟨has_adjoint_sub hG_adjoint (has_adjoint_smul c has_adjoint_id), _⟩⟩,
simp only [comp_eq_mul] at *,
simp [add_mul, mul_add, hG_comm, algebra.commutes]
end
lemma inner_adjoint_eq_inner_of_normal {F : V →ₗ[ℝ] V} (h : normal F) :
∀ x, inner (F.adjoint x) (F.adjoint x) = inner (F x) (F x) :=
begin
intros x,
rw inner_adjoint (has_adjoint_of_normal h),
rw ←comp_apply,
rw ←inner_adjoint (has_adjoint_of_normal h),
rw ←comp_apply,
rw adjoint_comm_of_normal h,
apply inner_comm
end
lemma ker_adjoint_of_normal {F : V →ₗ[ℝ] V} (h : normal F) :
F.adjoint.ker = F.ker :=
begin
ext,
rw [mem_ker, ←inner_self_eq_zero, inner_adjoint_eq_inner_of_normal h,
mem_ker, ←inner_self_eq_zero],
end
lemma ker_pow_eq_ker_of_normal
{F : V →ₗ[ℝ] V} (k : ℕ) (hn : normal F) :
(F ^ k.succ).ker = F.ker :=
begin
induction k with k ih,
{ refl },
{ ext,
split,
{ assume h : x ∈ ker (F ^ k.succ.succ),
have h0 : F.adjoint ((F ^ k.succ) x) = 0,
{ rw [mem_ker, pow_succ, mul_app, ←mem_ker,
←ker_adjoint_of_normal hn, mem_ker] at h,
exact h },
show x ∈ ker F,
by rw [←ih, mem_ker, ←inner_self_eq_zero, pow_succ, mul_app,
inner_adjoint (has_adjoint_of_normal hn), ←mul_app F,
←pow_succ, h0, inner_zero_right] },
{ intro h,
rw [mem_ker] at *,
rw [pow_succ', mul_app, h, map_zero] } }
end
end linear_map |
5ff32e0faeb6432a374539f13550908902a4261d | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/structure.lean | 2d47702d931628e35cd2b431e7b644ad730b5728 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,262 | lean | import Lean
open Lean
structure S1 :=
(x y : Nat)
structure S2 extends S1 :=
(z : Nat)
structure S3 :=
(w : Nat)
structure S4 extends S2, S3 :=
(s : Nat)
def check (b : Bool) : CoreM Unit :=
unless b do throwError "check failed"
class S5 :=
(x y : Nat)
inductive D
| mk (x y z : Nat) : D
def tst : CoreM Unit :=
do let env ← getEnv
IO.println (getStructureFields env `Lean.Environment)
check $ getStructureFields env `S4 == #[`toS2, `toS3, `s]
check $ getStructureFields env `S1 == #[`x, `y]
check $ isSubobjectField? env `S4 `toS2 == some `S2
check $ getParentStructures env `S4 == #[`S2, `S3]
check $ findField? env `S4 `x == some `S1
check $ findField? env `S4 `x1 == none
check $ isStructure env `S1
check $ isStructure env `S2
check $ isStructure env `S3
check $ isStructure env `S4
check $ isStructure env `S5
check $ !isStructure env `Nat
check $ !isStructure env `D
IO.println (getStructureFieldsFlattened env `S4)
IO.println (getStructureFields env `D)
IO.println (getPathToBaseStructure? env `S1 `S4)
IO.println (getParentStructures env `S4)
IO.println (getAllParentStructures env `S4)
check $ getPathToBaseStructure? env `S1 `S4 == some [`S4.toS2, `S2.toS1]
pure ()
#eval tst
|
e60c40eb14d14e9bc5849f6a45ced3101d5bff81 | bb31430994044506fa42fd667e2d556327e18dfe | /src/measure_theory/covering/besicovitch.lean | 186470555d8a252c408f468be879ce5cf9c8f696 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | sgouezel/mathlib | 0cb4e5335a2ba189fa7af96d83a377f83270e503 | 00638177efd1b2534fc5269363ebf42a7871df9a | refs/heads/master | 1,674,527,483,042 | 1,673,665,568,000 | 1,673,665,568,000 | 119,598,202 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,517,348,647,000 | 1,517,348,646,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 60,361 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import measure_theory.covering.differentiation
import measure_theory.covering.vitali_family
import measure_theory.integral.lebesgue
import measure_theory.measure.regular
import set_theory.ordinal.arithmetic
import topology.metric_space.basic
/-!
# Besicovitch covering theorems
The topological Besicovitch covering theorem ensures that, in a nice metric space, there exists a
number `N` such that, from any family of balls with bounded radii, one can extract `N` families,
each made of disjoint balls, covering together all the centers of the initial family.
By "nice metric space", we mean a technical property stated as follows: there exists no satellite
configuration of `N + 1` points (with a given parameter `τ > 1`). Such a configuration is a family
of `N + 1` balls, where the first `N` balls all intersect the last one, but none of them contains
the center of another one and their radii are controlled. This property is for instance
satisfied by finite-dimensional real vector spaces.
In this file, we prove the topological Besicovitch covering theorem,
in `besicovitch.exist_disjoint_covering_families`.
The measurable Besicovitch theorem ensures that, in the same class of metric spaces, if at every
point one considers a class of balls of arbitrarily small radii, called admissible balls, then
one can cover almost all the space by a family of disjoint admissible balls.
It is deduced from the topological Besicovitch theorem, and proved
in `besicovitch.exists_disjoint_closed_ball_covering_ae`.
This implies that balls of small radius form a Vitali family in such spaces. Therefore, theorems
on differentiation of measures hold as a consequence of general results. We restate them in this
context to make them more easily usable.
## Main definitions and results
* `satellite_config α N τ` is the type of all satellite configurations of `N + 1` points
in the metric space `α`, with parameter `τ`.
* `has_besicovitch_covering` is a class recording that there exist `N` and `τ > 1` such that
there is no satellite configuration of `N + 1` points with parameter `τ`.
* `exist_disjoint_covering_families` is the topological Besicovitch covering theorem: from any
family of balls one can extract finitely many disjoint subfamilies covering the same set.
* `exists_disjoint_closed_ball_covering` is the measurable Besicovitch covering theorem: from any
family of balls with arbitrarily small radii at every point, one can extract countably many
disjoint balls covering almost all the space. While the value of `N` is relevant for the precise
statement of the topological Besicovitch theorem, it becomes irrelevant for the measurable one.
Therefore, this statement is expressed using the `Prop`-valued
typeclass `has_besicovitch_covering`.
We also restate the following specialized versions of general theorems on differentiation of
measures:
* `besicovitch.ae_tendsto_rn_deriv` ensures that `ρ (closed_ball x r) / μ (closed_ball x r)` tends
almost surely to the Radon-Nikodym derivative of `ρ` with respect to `μ` at `x`.
* `besicovitch.ae_tendsto_measure_inter_div` states that almost every point in an arbitrary set `s`
is a Lebesgue density point, i.e., `μ (s ∩ closed_ball x r) / μ (closed_ball x r)` tends to `1` as
`r` tends to `0`. A stronger version for measurable sets is given in
`besicovitch.ae_tendsto_measure_inter_div_of_measurable_set`.
## Implementation
#### Sketch of proof of the topological Besicovitch theorem:
We choose balls in a greedy way. First choose a ball with maximal radius (or rather, since there
is no guarantee the maximal radius is realized, a ball with radius within a factor `τ` of the
supremum). Then, remove all balls whose center is covered by the first ball, and choose among the
remaining ones a ball with radius close to maximum. Go on forever until there is no available
center (this is a transfinite induction in general).
Then define inductively a coloring of the balls. A ball will be of color `i` if it intersects
already chosen balls of color `0`, ..., `i - 1`, but none of color `i`. In this way, balls of the
same color form a disjoint family, and the space is covered by the families of the different colors.
The nontrivial part is to show that at most `N` colors are used. If one needs `N + 1` colors,
consider the first time this happens. Then the corresponding ball intersects `N` balls of the
different colors. Moreover, the inductive construction ensures that the radii of all the balls are
controlled: they form a satellite configuration with `N + 1` balls (essentially by definition of
satellite configurations). Since we assume that there are no such configurations, this is a
contradiction.
#### Sketch of proof of the measurable Besicovitch theorem:
From the topological Besicovitch theorem, one can find a disjoint countable family of balls
covering a proportion `> 1 / (N + 1)` of the space. Taking a large enough finite subset of these
balls, one gets the same property for finitely many balls. Their union is closed. Therefore, any
point in the complement has around it an admissible ball not intersecting these finitely many balls.
Applying again the topological Besicovitch theorem, one extracts from these a disjoint countable
subfamily covering a proportion `> 1 / (N + 1)` of the remaining points, and then even a disjoint
finite subfamily. Then one goes on again and again, covering at each step a positive proportion of
the remaining points, while remaining disjoint from the already chosen balls. The union of all these
balls is the desired almost everywhere covering.
-/
noncomputable theory
universe u
open metric set filter fin measure_theory topological_space
open_locale topological_space classical big_operators ennreal measure_theory nnreal
/-!
### Satellite configurations
-/
/-- A satellite configuration is a configuration of `N+1` points that shows up in the inductive
construction for the Besicovitch covering theorem. It depends on some parameter `τ ≥ 1`.
This is a family of balls (indexed by `i : fin N.succ`, with center `c i` and radius `r i`) such
that the last ball intersects all the other balls (condition `inter`),
and given any two balls there is an order between them, ensuring that the first ball does not
contain the center of the other one, and the radius of the second ball can not be larger than
the radius of the first ball (up to a factor `τ`). This order corresponds to the order of choice
in the inductive construction: otherwise, the second ball would have been chosen before.
This is the condition `h`.
Finally, the last ball is chosen after all the other ones, meaning that `h` can be strengthened
by keeping only one side of the alternative in `hlast`.
-/
structure besicovitch.satellite_config (α : Type*) [metric_space α] (N : ℕ) (τ : ℝ) :=
(c : fin N.succ → α)
(r : fin N.succ → ℝ)
(rpos : ∀ i, 0 < r i)
(h : ∀ i j, i ≠ j → (r i ≤ dist (c i) (c j) ∧ r j ≤ τ * r i) ∨
(r j ≤ dist (c j) (c i) ∧ r i ≤ τ * r j))
(hlast : ∀ i < last N, r i ≤ dist (c i) (c (last N)) ∧ r (last N) ≤ τ * r i)
(inter : ∀ i < last N, dist (c i) (c (last N)) ≤ r i + r (last N))
/-- A metric space has the Besicovitch covering property if there exist `N` and `τ > 1` such that
there are no satellite configuration of parameter `τ` with `N+1` points. This is the condition that
guarantees that the measurable Besicovitch covering theorem holds. It is satified by
finite-dimensional real vector spaces. -/
class has_besicovitch_covering (α : Type*) [metric_space α] : Prop :=
(no_satellite_config [] : ∃ (N : ℕ) (τ : ℝ), 1 < τ ∧ is_empty (besicovitch.satellite_config α N τ))
/-- There is always a satellite configuration with a single point. -/
instance {α : Type*} {τ : ℝ} [inhabited α] [metric_space α] :
inhabited (besicovitch.satellite_config α 0 τ) :=
⟨{ c := default,
r := λ i, 1,
rpos := λ i, zero_lt_one,
h := λ i j hij, (hij (subsingleton.elim i j)).elim,
hlast := λ i hi, by { rw subsingleton.elim i (last 0) at hi, exact (lt_irrefl _ hi).elim },
inter := λ i hi, by { rw subsingleton.elim i (last 0) at hi, exact (lt_irrefl _ hi).elim } }⟩
namespace besicovitch
namespace satellite_config
variables {α : Type*} [metric_space α] {N : ℕ} {τ : ℝ} (a : satellite_config α N τ)
lemma inter' (i : fin N.succ) : dist (a.c i) (a.c (last N)) ≤ a.r i + a.r (last N) :=
begin
rcases lt_or_le i (last N) with H|H,
{ exact a.inter i H },
{ have I : i = last N := top_le_iff.1 H,
have := (a.rpos (last N)).le,
simp only [I, add_nonneg this this, dist_self] }
end
lemma hlast' (i : fin N.succ) (h : 1 ≤ τ) : a.r (last N) ≤ τ * a.r i :=
begin
rcases lt_or_le i (last N) with H|H,
{ exact (a.hlast i H).2 },
{ have : i = last N := top_le_iff.1 H,
rw this,
exact le_mul_of_one_le_left (a.rpos _).le h }
end
end satellite_config
/-! ### Extracting disjoint subfamilies from a ball covering -/
/-- A ball package is a family of balls in a metric space with positive bounded radii. -/
structure ball_package (β : Type*) (α : Type*) :=
(c : β → α)
(r : β → ℝ)
(rpos : ∀ b, 0 < r b)
(r_bound : ℝ)
(r_le : ∀ b, r b ≤ r_bound)
/-- The ball package made of unit balls. -/
def unit_ball_package (α : Type*) : ball_package α α :=
{ c := id,
r := λ _, 1,
rpos := λ _, zero_lt_one,
r_bound := 1,
r_le := λ _, le_rfl }
instance (α : Type*) : inhabited (ball_package α α) :=
⟨unit_ball_package α⟩
/-- A Besicovitch tau-package is a family of balls in a metric space with positive bounded radii,
together with enough data to proceed with the Besicovitch greedy algorithm. We register this in
a single structure to make sure that all our constructions in this algorithm only depend on
one variable. -/
structure tau_package (β : Type*) (α : Type*) extends ball_package β α :=
(τ : ℝ)
(one_lt_tau : 1 < τ)
instance (α : Type*) : inhabited (tau_package α α) :=
⟨{ τ := 2,
one_lt_tau := one_lt_two,
.. unit_ball_package α }⟩
variables {α : Type*} [metric_space α] {β : Type u}
namespace tau_package
variables [nonempty β] (p : tau_package β α)
include p
/-- Choose inductively large balls with centers that are not contained in the union of already
chosen balls. This is a transfinite induction. -/
noncomputable def index : ordinal.{u} → β
| i :=
-- `Z` is the set of points that are covered by already constructed balls
let Z := ⋃ (j : {j // j < i}), ball (p.c (index j)) (p.r (index j)),
-- `R` is the supremum of the radii of balls with centers not in `Z`
R := supr (λ b : {b : β // p.c b ∉ Z}, p.r b) in
-- return an index `b` for which the center `c b` is not in `Z`, and the radius is at
-- least `R / τ`, if such an index exists (and garbage otherwise).
classical.epsilon (λ b : β, p.c b ∉ Z ∧ R ≤ p.τ * p.r b)
using_well_founded {dec_tac := `[exact j.2]}
/-- The set of points that are covered by the union of balls selected at steps `< i`. -/
def Union_up_to (i : ordinal.{u}) : set α :=
⋃ (j : {j // j < i}), ball (p.c (p.index j)) (p.r (p.index j))
lemma monotone_Union_up_to : monotone p.Union_up_to :=
begin
assume i j hij,
simp only [Union_up_to],
exact Union_mono' (λ r, ⟨⟨r, r.2.trans_le hij⟩, subset.rfl⟩),
end
/-- Supremum of the radii of balls whose centers are not yet covered at step `i`. -/
def R (i : ordinal.{u}) : ℝ :=
supr (λ b : {b : β // p.c b ∉ p.Union_up_to i}, p.r b)
/-- Group the balls into disjoint families, by assigning to a ball the smallest color for which
it does not intersect any already chosen ball of this color. -/
noncomputable def color : ordinal.{u} → ℕ
| i := let A : set ℕ := ⋃ (j : {j // j < i})
(hj : (closed_ball (p.c (p.index j)) (p.r (p.index j))
∩ closed_ball (p.c (p.index i)) (p.r (p.index i))).nonempty), {color j} in
Inf (univ \ A)
using_well_founded {dec_tac := `[exact j.2]}
/-- `p.last_step` is the first ordinal where the construction stops making sense, i.e., `f` returns
garbage since there is no point left to be chosen. We will only use ordinals before this step. -/
def last_step : ordinal.{u} :=
Inf {i | ¬ ∃ (b : β), p.c b ∉ p.Union_up_to i ∧ p.R i ≤ p.τ * p.r b}
lemma last_step_nonempty :
{i | ¬ ∃ (b : β), p.c b ∉ p.Union_up_to i ∧ p.R i ≤ p.τ * p.r b}.nonempty :=
begin
by_contra,
suffices H : function.injective p.index, from not_injective_of_ordinal p.index H,
assume x y hxy,
wlog x_le_y : x ≤ y := le_total x y using [x y, y x],
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le x_le_y with rfl|H, { refl },
simp only [nonempty_def, not_exists, exists_prop, not_and, not_lt, not_le, mem_set_of_eq,
not_forall] at h,
specialize h y,
have A : p.c (p.index y) ∉ p.Union_up_to y,
{ have : p.index y = classical.epsilon (λ b : β, p.c b ∉ p.Union_up_to y ∧ p.R y ≤ p.τ * p.r b),
by { rw [tau_package.index], refl },
rw this,
exact (classical.epsilon_spec h).1 },
simp only [Union_up_to, not_exists, exists_prop, mem_Union, mem_closed_ball, not_and, not_le,
subtype.exists, subtype.coe_mk] at A,
specialize A x H,
simp [hxy] at A,
exact (lt_irrefl _ ((p.rpos (p.index y)).trans_le A)).elim
end
/-- Every point is covered by chosen balls, before `p.last_step`. -/
lemma mem_Union_up_to_last_step (x : β) : p.c x ∈ p.Union_up_to p.last_step :=
begin
have A : ∀ (z : β), p.c z ∈ p.Union_up_to p.last_step ∨ p.τ * p.r z < p.R p.last_step,
{ have : p.last_step ∈ {i | ¬ ∃ (b : β), p.c b ∉ p.Union_up_to i ∧ p.R i ≤ p.τ * p.r b} :=
Inf_mem p.last_step_nonempty,
simpa only [not_exists, mem_set_of_eq, not_and_distrib, not_le, not_not_mem] },
by_contra,
rcases A x with H|H, { exact h H },
have Rpos : 0 < p.R p.last_step,
{ apply lt_trans (mul_pos (_root_.zero_lt_one.trans p.one_lt_tau) (p.rpos _)) H },
have B : p.τ⁻¹ * p.R p.last_step < p.R p.last_step,
{ conv_rhs { rw ← one_mul (p.R p.last_step) },
exact mul_lt_mul (inv_lt_one p.one_lt_tau) le_rfl Rpos zero_le_one },
obtain ⟨y, hy1, hy2⟩ : ∃ (y : β),
p.c y ∉ p.Union_up_to p.last_step ∧ (p.τ)⁻¹ * p.R p.last_step < p.r y,
{ simpa only [exists_prop, mem_range, exists_exists_and_eq_and, subtype.exists, subtype.coe_mk]
using exists_lt_of_lt_cSup _ B,
rw [← image_univ, nonempty_image_iff],
exact ⟨⟨_, h⟩, mem_univ _⟩ },
rcases A y with Hy|Hy,
{ exact hy1 Hy },
{ rw ← div_eq_inv_mul at hy2,
have := (div_le_iff' (_root_.zero_lt_one.trans p.one_lt_tau)).1 hy2.le,
exact lt_irrefl _ (Hy.trans_le this) }
end
/-- If there are no configurations of satellites with `N+1` points, one never uses more than `N`
distinct families in the Besicovitch inductive construction. -/
lemma color_lt {i : ordinal.{u}} (hi : i < p.last_step)
{N : ℕ} (hN : is_empty (satellite_config α N p.τ)) :
p.color i < N :=
begin
/- By contradiction, consider the first ordinal `i` for which one would have `p.color i = N`.
Choose for each `k < N` a ball with color `k` that intersects the ball at color `i`
(there is such a ball, otherwise one would have used the color `k` and not `N`).
Then this family of `N+1` balls forms a satellite configuration, which is forbidden by
the assumption `hN`. -/
induction i using ordinal.induction with i IH,
let A : set ℕ := ⋃ (j : {j // j < i})
(hj : (closed_ball (p.c (p.index j)) (p.r (p.index j))
∩ closed_ball (p.c (p.index i)) (p.r (p.index i))).nonempty), {p.color j},
have color_i : p.color i = Inf (univ \ A), by rw [color],
rw color_i,
have N_mem : N ∈ univ \ A,
{ simp only [not_exists, true_and, exists_prop, mem_Union, mem_singleton_iff, mem_closed_ball,
not_and, mem_univ, mem_diff, subtype.exists, subtype.coe_mk],
assume j ji hj,
exact (IH j ji (ji.trans hi)).ne' },
suffices : Inf (univ \ A) ≠ N,
{ rcases (cInf_le (order_bot.bdd_below (univ \ A)) N_mem).lt_or_eq with H|H,
{ exact H },
{ exact (this H).elim } },
assume Inf_eq_N,
have : ∀ k, k < N → ∃ j, j < i
∧ (closed_ball (p.c (p.index j)) (p.r (p.index j))
∩ closed_ball (p.c (p.index i)) (p.r (p.index i))).nonempty
∧ k = p.color j,
{ assume k hk,
rw ← Inf_eq_N at hk,
have : k ∈ A,
by simpa only [true_and, mem_univ, not_not, mem_diff] using nat.not_mem_of_lt_Inf hk,
simp at this,
simpa only [exists_prop, mem_Union, mem_singleton_iff, mem_closed_ball, subtype.exists,
subtype.coe_mk] },
choose! g hg using this,
-- Choose for each `k < N` an ordinal `G k < i` giving a ball of color `k` intersecting
-- the last ball.
let G : ℕ → ordinal := λ n, if n = N then i else g n,
have color_G : ∀ n, n ≤ N → p.color (G n) = n,
{ assume n hn,
unfreezingI { rcases hn.eq_or_lt with rfl|H },
{ simp only [G], simp only [color_i, Inf_eq_N, if_true, eq_self_iff_true] },
{ simp only [G], simp only [H.ne, (hg n H).right.right.symm, if_false] } },
have G_lt_last : ∀ n, n ≤ N → G n < p.last_step,
{ assume n hn,
unfreezingI { rcases hn.eq_or_lt with rfl|H },
{ simp only [G], simp only [hi, if_true, eq_self_iff_true], },
{ simp only [G], simp only [H.ne, (hg n H).left.trans hi, if_false] } },
have fGn : ∀ n, n ≤ N →
p.c (p.index (G n)) ∉ p.Union_up_to (G n) ∧ p.R (G n) ≤ p.τ * p.r (p.index (G n)),
{ assume n hn,
have: p.index (G n) = classical.epsilon
(λ t, p.c t ∉ p.Union_up_to (G n) ∧ p.R (G n) ≤ p.τ * p.r t), by { rw index, refl },
rw this,
have : ∃ t, p.c t ∉ p.Union_up_to (G n) ∧ p.R (G n) ≤ p.τ * p.r t,
by simpa only [not_exists, exists_prop, not_and, not_lt, not_le, mem_set_of_eq,
not_forall] using not_mem_of_lt_cInf (G_lt_last n hn) (order_bot.bdd_below _),
exact classical.epsilon_spec this },
-- the balls with indices `G k` satisfy the characteristic property of satellite configurations.
have Gab : ∀ (a b : fin (nat.succ N)), G a < G b →
p.r (p.index (G a)) ≤ dist (p.c (p.index (G a))) (p.c (p.index (G b)))
∧ p.r (p.index (G b)) ≤ p.τ * p.r (p.index (G a)),
{ assume a b G_lt,
have ha : (a : ℕ) ≤ N := nat.lt_succ_iff.1 a.2,
have hb : (b : ℕ) ≤ N := nat.lt_succ_iff.1 b.2,
split,
{ have := (fGn b hb).1,
simp only [Union_up_to, not_exists, exists_prop, mem_Union, mem_closed_ball, not_and,
not_le, subtype.exists, subtype.coe_mk] at this,
simpa only [dist_comm, mem_ball, not_lt] using this (G a) G_lt },
{ apply le_trans _ (fGn a ha).2,
have B : p.c (p.index (G b)) ∉ p.Union_up_to (G a),
{ assume H, exact (fGn b hb).1 (p.monotone_Union_up_to G_lt.le H) },
let b' : {t // p.c t ∉ p.Union_up_to (G a)} := ⟨p.index (G b), B⟩,
apply @le_csupr _ _ _ (λ t : {t // p.c t ∉ p.Union_up_to (G a)}, p.r t) _ b',
refine ⟨p.r_bound, λ t ht, _⟩,
simp only [exists_prop, mem_range, subtype.exists, subtype.coe_mk] at ht,
rcases ht with ⟨u, hu⟩,
rw ← hu.2,
exact p.r_le _ } },
-- therefore, one may use them to construct a satellite configuration with `N+1` points
let sc : satellite_config α N p.τ :=
{ c := λ k, p.c (p.index (G k)),
r := λ k, p.r (p.index (G k)),
rpos := λ k, p.rpos (p.index (G k)),
h := begin
assume a b a_ne_b,
wlog G_le : G a ≤ G b := le_total (G a) (G b) using [a b, b a] tactic.skip,
{ have G_lt : G a < G b,
{ rcases G_le.lt_or_eq with H|H, { exact H },
have A : (a : ℕ) ≠ b := fin.coe_injective.ne a_ne_b,
rw [← color_G a (nat.lt_succ_iff.1 a.2), ← color_G b (nat.lt_succ_iff.1 b.2), H] at A,
exact (A rfl).elim },
exact or.inl (Gab a b G_lt) },
{ assume a_ne_b,
rw or_comm,
exact this a_ne_b.symm }
end,
hlast := begin
assume a ha,
have I : (a : ℕ) < N := ha,
have : G a < G (fin.last N), by { dsimp [G], simp [I.ne, (hg a I).1] },
exact Gab _ _ this,
end,
inter := begin
assume a ha,
have I : (a : ℕ) < N := ha,
have J : G (fin.last N) = i, by { dsimp [G], simp only [if_true, eq_self_iff_true], },
have K : G a = g a, { dsimp [G], simp [I.ne, (hg a I).1] },
convert dist_le_add_of_nonempty_closed_ball_inter_closed_ball (hg _ I).2.1,
end },
-- this is a contradiction
exact (hN.false : _) sc
end
end tau_package
open tau_package
/-- The topological Besicovitch covering theorem: there exist finitely many families of disjoint
balls covering all the centers in a package. More specifically, one can use `N` families if there
are no satellite configurations with `N+1` points. -/
theorem exist_disjoint_covering_families {N : ℕ} {τ : ℝ}
(hτ : 1 < τ) (hN : is_empty (satellite_config α N τ)) (q : ball_package β α) :
∃ s : fin N → set β,
(∀ (i : fin N), (s i).pairwise_disjoint (λ j, closed_ball (q.c j) (q.r j))) ∧
(range q.c ⊆ ⋃ (i : fin N), ⋃ (j ∈ s i), ball (q.c j) (q.r j)) :=
begin
-- first exclude the trivial case where `β` is empty (we need non-emptiness for the transfinite
-- induction, to be able to choose garbage when there is no point left).
casesI is_empty_or_nonempty β,
{ refine ⟨λ i, ∅, λ i, pairwise_disjoint_empty, _⟩,
rw [← image_univ, eq_empty_of_is_empty (univ : set β)],
simp },
-- Now, assume `β` is nonempty.
let p : tau_package β α := { τ := τ, one_lt_tau := hτ, .. q },
-- we use for `s i` the balls of color `i`.
let s := λ (i : fin N),
⋃ (k : ordinal.{u}) (hk : k < p.last_step) (h'k : p.color k = i), ({p.index k} : set β),
refine ⟨s, λ i, _, _⟩,
{ -- show that balls of the same color are disjoint
assume x hx y hy x_ne_y,
obtain ⟨jx, jx_lt, jxi, rfl⟩ :
∃ (jx : ordinal), jx < p.last_step ∧ p.color jx = i ∧ x = p.index jx,
by simpa only [exists_prop, mem_Union, mem_singleton_iff] using hx,
obtain ⟨jy, jy_lt, jyi, rfl⟩ :
∃ (jy : ordinal), jy < p.last_step ∧ p.color jy = i ∧ y = p.index jy,
by simpa only [exists_prop, mem_Union, mem_singleton_iff] using hy,
wlog jxy : jx ≤ jy := le_total jx jy using [jx jy, jy jx] tactic.skip,
swap,
{ assume h1 h2 h3 h4 h5 h6 h7,
rw [function.on_fun, disjoint.comm],
exact this h4 h5 h6 h1 h2 h3 h7.symm },
replace jxy : jx < jy,
by { rcases lt_or_eq_of_le jxy with H|rfl, { exact H }, { exact (x_ne_y rfl).elim } },
let A : set ℕ := ⋃ (j : {j // j < jy})
(hj : (closed_ball (p.c (p.index j)) (p.r (p.index j))
∩ closed_ball (p.c (p.index jy)) (p.r (p.index jy))).nonempty), {p.color j},
have color_j : p.color jy = Inf (univ \ A), by rw [tau_package.color],
have : p.color jy ∈ univ \ A,
{ rw color_j,
apply Inf_mem,
refine ⟨N, _⟩,
simp only [not_exists, true_and, exists_prop, mem_Union, mem_singleton_iff, not_and, mem_univ,
mem_diff, subtype.exists, subtype.coe_mk],
assume k hk H,
exact (p.color_lt (hk.trans jy_lt) hN).ne' },
simp only [not_exists, true_and, exists_prop, mem_Union, mem_singleton_iff, not_and, mem_univ,
mem_diff, subtype.exists, subtype.coe_mk] at this,
specialize this jx jxy,
contrapose! this,
simpa only [jxi, jyi, and_true, eq_self_iff_true, ← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter] },
{ -- show that the balls of color at most `N` cover every center.
refine range_subset_iff.2 (λ b, _),
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ :
∃ (a : ordinal), a < p.last_step ∧ dist (p.c b) (p.c (p.index a)) < p.r (p.index a),
by simpa only [Union_up_to, exists_prop, mem_Union, mem_ball, subtype.exists, subtype.coe_mk]
using p.mem_Union_up_to_last_step b,
simp only [exists_prop, mem_Union, mem_ball, mem_singleton_iff, bUnion_and', exists_eq_left,
Union_exists, exists_and_distrib_left],
exact ⟨⟨p.color a, p.color_lt ha.1 hN⟩, a, rfl, ha⟩ }
end
/-!
### The measurable Besicovitch covering theorem
-/
open_locale nnreal
variables [second_countable_topology α] [measurable_space α] [opens_measurable_space α]
/-- Consider, for each `x` in a set `s`, a radius `r x ∈ (0, 1]`. Then one can find finitely
many disjoint balls of the form `closed_ball x (r x)` covering a proportion `1/(N+1)` of `s`, if
there are no satellite configurations with `N+1` points.
-/
lemma exist_finset_disjoint_balls_large_measure
(μ : measure α) [is_finite_measure μ] {N : ℕ} {τ : ℝ}
(hτ : 1 < τ) (hN : is_empty (satellite_config α N τ)) (s : set α)
(r : α → ℝ) (rpos : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 < r x) (rle : ∀ x ∈ s, r x ≤ 1) :
∃ (t : finset α), (↑t ⊆ s) ∧ μ (s \ (⋃ (x ∈ t), closed_ball x (r x))) ≤ N/(N+1) * μ s
∧ (t : set α).pairwise_disjoint (λ x, closed_ball x (r x)) :=
begin
-- exclude the trivial case where `μ s = 0`.
rcases le_or_lt (μ s) 0 with hμs|hμs,
{ have : μ s = 0 := le_bot_iff.1 hμs,
refine ⟨∅, by simp only [finset.coe_empty, empty_subset], _, _⟩,
{ simp only [this, diff_empty, Union_false, Union_empty, nonpos_iff_eq_zero, mul_zero] },
{ simp only [finset.coe_empty, pairwise_disjoint_empty], } },
casesI is_empty_or_nonempty α,
{ simp only [eq_empty_of_is_empty s, measure_empty] at hμs,
exact (lt_irrefl _ hμs).elim },
have Npos : N ≠ 0,
{ unfreezingI { rintros rfl },
inhabit α,
exact (not_is_empty_of_nonempty _) hN },
-- introduce a measurable superset `o` with the same measure, for measure computations
obtain ⟨o, so, omeas, μo⟩ : ∃ (o : set α), s ⊆ o ∧ measurable_set o ∧ μ o = μ s :=
exists_measurable_superset μ s,
/- We will apply the topological Besicovitch theorem, giving `N` disjoint subfamilies of balls
covering `s`. Among these, one of them covers a proportion at least `1/N` of `s`. A large
enough finite subfamily will then cover a proportion at least `1/(N+1)`. -/
let a : ball_package s α :=
{ c := λ x, x,
r := λ x, r x,
rpos := λ x, rpos x x.2,
r_bound := 1,
r_le := λ x, rle x x.2 },
rcases exist_disjoint_covering_families hτ hN a with ⟨u, hu, hu'⟩,
have u_count : ∀ i, (u i).countable,
{ assume i,
refine (hu i).countable_of_nonempty_interior (λ j hj, _),
have : (ball (j : α) (r j)).nonempty := nonempty_ball.2 (a.rpos _),
exact this.mono ball_subset_interior_closed_ball },
let v : fin N → set α := λ i, ⋃ (x : s) (hx : x ∈ u i), closed_ball x (r x),
have : ∀ i, measurable_set (v i) :=
λ i, measurable_set.bUnion (u_count i) (λ b hb, measurable_set_closed_ball),
have A : s = ⋃ (i : fin N), s ∩ v i,
{ refine subset.antisymm _ (Union_subset (λ i, inter_subset_left _ _)),
assume x hx,
obtain ⟨i, y, hxy, h'⟩ : ∃ (i : fin N) (i_1 : ↥s) (i : i_1 ∈ u i), x ∈ ball ↑i_1 (r ↑i_1),
{ have : x ∈ range a.c, by simpa only [subtype.range_coe_subtype, set_of_mem_eq],
simpa only [mem_Union] using hu' this },
refine mem_Union.2 ⟨i, ⟨hx, _⟩⟩,
simp only [v, exists_prop, mem_Union, set_coe.exists, exists_and_distrib_right, subtype.coe_mk],
exact ⟨y, ⟨y.2, by simpa only [subtype.coe_eta]⟩, ball_subset_closed_ball h'⟩ },
have S : ∑ (i : fin N), μ s / N ≤ ∑ i, μ (s ∩ v i) := calc
∑ (i : fin N), μ s / N = μ s : begin
simp only [finset.card_fin, finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul],
rw ennreal.mul_div_cancel',
{ simp only [Npos, ne.def, nat.cast_eq_zero, not_false_iff] },
{ exact (ennreal.nat_ne_top _) }
end
... ≤ ∑ i, μ (s ∩ v i) : by { conv_lhs { rw A }, apply measure_Union_fintype_le },
-- choose an index `i` of a subfamily covering at least a proportion `1/N` of `s`.
obtain ⟨i, -, hi⟩ : ∃ (i : fin N) (hi : i ∈ finset.univ), μ s / N ≤ μ (s ∩ v i),
{ apply ennreal.exists_le_of_sum_le _ S,
exact ⟨⟨0, bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.2 Npos⟩, finset.mem_univ _⟩ },
replace hi : μ s / (N + 1) < μ (s ∩ v i),
{ apply lt_of_lt_of_le _ hi,
apply (ennreal.mul_lt_mul_left hμs.ne' (measure_lt_top μ s).ne).2,
rw ennreal.inv_lt_inv,
conv_lhs {rw ← add_zero (N : ℝ≥0∞) },
exact ennreal.add_lt_add_left (ennreal.nat_ne_top N) ennreal.zero_lt_one },
have B : μ (o ∩ v i) = ∑' (x : u i), μ (o ∩ closed_ball x (r x)),
{ have : o ∩ v i = ⋃ (x : s) (hx : x ∈ u i), o ∩ closed_ball x (r x), by simp only [inter_Union],
rw [this, measure_bUnion (u_count i)],
{ refl },
{ exact (hu i).mono (λ k, inter_subset_right _ _) },
{ exact λ b hb, omeas.inter measurable_set_closed_ball } },
-- A large enough finite subfamily of `u i` will also cover a proportion `> 1/(N+1)` of `s`.
-- Since `s` might not be measurable, we express this in terms of the measurable superset `o`.
obtain ⟨w, hw⟩ : ∃ (w : finset (u i)),
μ s / (N + 1) < ∑ (x : u i) in w, μ (o ∩ closed_ball (x : α) (r (x : α))),
{ have C : has_sum (λ (x : u i), μ (o ∩ closed_ball x (r x))) (μ (o ∩ v i)),
by { rw B, exact ennreal.summable.has_sum },
have : μ s / (N+1) < μ (o ∩ v i) :=
hi.trans_le (measure_mono (inter_subset_inter_left _ so)),
exact ((tendsto_order.1 C).1 _ this).exists },
-- Bring back the finset `w i` of `↑(u i)` to a finset of `α`, and check that it works by design.
refine ⟨finset.image (λ (x : u i), x) w, _, _, _⟩,
-- show that the finset is included in `s`.
{ simp only [image_subset_iff, coe_coe, finset.coe_image],
assume y hy,
simp only [subtype.coe_prop, mem_preimage] },
-- show that it covers a large enough proportion of `s`. For measure computations, we do not
-- use `s` (which might not be measurable), but its measurable superset `o`. Since their measures
-- are the same, this does not spoil the estimates
{ suffices H : μ (o \ ⋃ x ∈ w, closed_ball ↑x (r ↑x)) ≤ N/(N+1) * μ s,
{ rw [finset.set_bUnion_finset_image],
exact le_trans (measure_mono (diff_subset_diff so (subset.refl _))) H },
rw [← diff_inter_self_eq_diff,
measure_diff_le_iff_le_add _ (inter_subset_right _ _) ((measure_lt_top μ _).ne)], swap,
{ apply measurable_set.inter _ omeas,
haveI : encodable (u i) := (u_count i).to_encodable,
exact measurable_set.Union
(λ b, measurable_set.Union (λ hb, measurable_set_closed_ball)) },
calc
μ o = 1/(N+1) * μ s + N/(N+1) * μ s :
by { rw [μo, ← add_mul, ennreal.div_add_div_same, add_comm, ennreal.div_self, one_mul]; simp }
... ≤ μ ((⋃ (x ∈ w), closed_ball ↑x (r ↑x)) ∩ o) + N/(N+1) * μ s : begin
refine add_le_add _ le_rfl,
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, one_mul, mul_comm, ← div_eq_mul_inv],
apply hw.le.trans (le_of_eq _),
rw [← finset.set_bUnion_coe, inter_comm _ o, inter_Union₂, finset.set_bUnion_coe,
measure_bUnion_finset],
{ have : (w : set (u i)).pairwise_disjoint (λ (b : u i), closed_ball (b : α) (r (b : α))),
by { assume k hk l hl hkl, exact hu i k.2 l.2 (subtype.coe_injective.ne hkl) },
exact this.mono (λ k, inter_subset_right _ _) },
{ assume b hb,
apply omeas.inter measurable_set_closed_ball }
end },
-- show that the balls are disjoint
{ assume k hk l hl hkl,
obtain ⟨k', k'w, rfl⟩ : ∃ (k' : u i), k' ∈ w ∧ ↑↑k' = k,
by simpa only [mem_image, finset.mem_coe, coe_coe, finset.coe_image] using hk,
obtain ⟨l', l'w, rfl⟩ : ∃ (l' : u i), l' ∈ w ∧ ↑↑l' = l,
by simpa only [mem_image, finset.mem_coe, coe_coe, finset.coe_image] using hl,
have k'nel' : (k' : s) ≠ l',
by { assume h, rw h at hkl, exact hkl rfl },
exact hu i k'.2 l'.2 k'nel' }
end
variable [has_besicovitch_covering α]
/-- The measurable Besicovitch covering theorem. Assume that, for any `x` in a set `s`,
one is given a set of admissible closed balls centered at `x`, with arbitrarily small radii.
Then there exists a disjoint covering of almost all `s` by admissible closed balls centered at some
points of `s`.
This version requires that the underlying measure is finite, and that the space has the Besicovitch
covering property (which is satisfied for instance by normed real vector spaces). It expresses the
conclusion in a slightly awkward form (with a subset of `α × ℝ`) coming from the proof technique.
For a version assuming that the measure is sigma-finite,
see `exists_disjoint_closed_ball_covering_ae_aux`.
For a version giving the conclusion in a nicer form, see `exists_disjoint_closed_ball_covering_ae`.
-/
theorem exists_disjoint_closed_ball_covering_ae_of_finite_measure_aux
(μ : measure α) [is_finite_measure μ]
(f : α → set ℝ) (s : set α) (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).nonempty) :
∃ (t : set (α × ℝ)), t.countable
∧ (∀ (p : α × ℝ), p ∈ t → p.1 ∈ s) ∧ (∀ (p : α × ℝ), p ∈ t → p.2 ∈ f p.1)
∧ μ (s \ (⋃ (p : α × ℝ) (hp : p ∈ t), closed_ball p.1 p.2)) = 0
∧ t.pairwise_disjoint (λ p, closed_ball p.1 p.2) :=
begin
rcases has_besicovitch_covering.no_satellite_config α with ⟨N, τ, hτ, hN⟩,
/- Introduce a property `P` on finsets saying that we have a nice disjoint covering of a
subset of `s` by admissible balls. -/
let P : finset (α × ℝ) → Prop := λ t,
(t : set (α × ℝ)).pairwise_disjoint (λ p, closed_ball p.1 p.2) ∧
(∀ (p : α × ℝ), p ∈ t → p.1 ∈ s) ∧ (∀ (p : α × ℝ), p ∈ t → p.2 ∈ f p.1),
/- Given a finite good covering of a subset `s`, one can find a larger finite good covering,
covering additionally a proportion at least `1/(N+1)` of leftover points. This follows from
`exist_finset_disjoint_balls_large_measure` applied to balls not intersecting the initial
covering. -/
have : ∀ (t : finset (α × ℝ)), P t → ∃ (u : finset (α × ℝ)), t ⊆ u ∧ P u ∧
μ (s \ (⋃ (p : α × ℝ) (hp : p ∈ u), closed_ball p.1 p.2)) ≤
N/(N+1) * μ (s \ (⋃ (p : α × ℝ) (hp : p ∈ t), closed_ball p.1 p.2)),
{ assume t ht,
set B := ⋃ (p : α × ℝ) (hp : p ∈ t), closed_ball p.1 p.2 with hB,
have B_closed : is_closed B :=
is_closed_bUnion (finset.finite_to_set _) (λ i hi, is_closed_ball),
set s' := s \ B with hs',
have : ∀ x ∈ s', ∃ r ∈ f x ∩ Ioo 0 1, disjoint B (closed_ball x r),
{ assume x hx,
have xs : x ∈ s := ((mem_diff x).1 hx).1,
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty B with hB|hB,
{ have : (0 : ℝ) < 1 := zero_lt_one,
rcases hf x xs 1 zero_lt_one with ⟨r, hr, h'r⟩,
exact ⟨r, ⟨hr, h'r⟩, by simp only [hB, empty_disjoint]⟩ },
{ let R := inf_dist x B,
have : 0 < min R 1 :=
lt_min ((B_closed.not_mem_iff_inf_dist_pos hB).1 ((mem_diff x).1 hx).2) zero_lt_one,
rcases hf x xs _ this with ⟨r, hr, h'r⟩,
refine ⟨r, ⟨hr, ⟨h'r.1, h'r.2.trans_le (min_le_right _ _)⟩⟩, _⟩,
rw disjoint.comm,
exact disjoint_closed_ball_of_lt_inf_dist (h'r.2.trans_le (min_le_left _ _)) } },
choose! r hr using this,
obtain ⟨v, vs', hμv, hv⟩ : ∃ (v : finset α), ↑v ⊆ s'
∧ μ (s' \ ⋃ (x ∈ v), closed_ball x (r x)) ≤ N/(N+1) * μ s'
∧ (v : set α).pairwise_disjoint (λ (x : α), closed_ball x (r x)),
{ have rI : ∀ x ∈ s', r x ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1 := λ x hx, (hr x hx).1.2,
exact exist_finset_disjoint_balls_large_measure μ hτ hN s' r (λ x hx, (rI x hx).1)
(λ x hx, (rI x hx).2.le) },
refine ⟨t ∪ (finset.image (λ x, (x, r x)) v), finset.subset_union_left _ _, ⟨_, _, _⟩, _⟩,
{ simp only [finset.coe_union, pairwise_disjoint_union, ht.1, true_and, finset.coe_image],
split,
{ assume p hp q hq hpq,
rcases (mem_image _ _ _).1 hp with ⟨p', p'v, rfl⟩,
rcases (mem_image _ _ _).1 hq with ⟨q', q'v, rfl⟩,
refine hv p'v q'v (λ hp'q', _),
rw [hp'q'] at hpq,
exact hpq rfl },
{ assume p hp q hq hpq,
rcases (mem_image _ _ _).1 hq with ⟨q', q'v, rfl⟩,
apply disjoint_of_subset_left _ (hr q' (vs' q'v)).2,
rw [hB, ← finset.set_bUnion_coe],
exact subset_bUnion_of_mem hp } },
{ assume p hp,
rcases finset.mem_union.1 hp with h'p|h'p,
{ exact ht.2.1 p h'p },
{ rcases finset.mem_image.1 h'p with ⟨p', p'v, rfl⟩,
exact ((mem_diff _).1 (vs' (finset.mem_coe.2 p'v))).1 } },
{ assume p hp,
rcases finset.mem_union.1 hp with h'p|h'p,
{ exact ht.2.2 p h'p },
{ rcases finset.mem_image.1 h'p with ⟨p', p'v, rfl⟩,
exact (hr p' (vs' p'v)).1.1 } },
{ convert hμv using 2,
rw [finset.set_bUnion_union, ← diff_diff, finset.set_bUnion_finset_image] } },
/- Define `F` associating to a finite good covering the above enlarged good covering, covering
a proportion `1/(N+1)` of leftover points. Iterating `F`, one will get larger and larger good
coverings, missing in the end only a measure-zero set. -/
choose! F hF using this,
let u := λ n, F^[n] ∅,
have u_succ : ∀ (n : ℕ), u n.succ = F (u n) :=
λ n, by simp only [u, function.comp_app, function.iterate_succ'],
have Pu : ∀ n, P (u n),
{ assume n,
induction n with n IH,
{ simp only [u, P, prod.forall, id.def, function.iterate_zero],
simp only [finset.not_mem_empty, is_empty.forall_iff, finset.coe_empty, forall_2_true_iff,
and_self, pairwise_disjoint_empty] },
{ rw u_succ,
exact (hF (u n) IH).2.1 } },
refine ⟨⋃ n, u n, countable_Union (λ n, (u n).countable_to_set), _, _, _, _⟩,
{ assume p hp,
rcases mem_Union.1 hp with ⟨n, hn⟩,
exact (Pu n).2.1 p (finset.mem_coe.1 hn) },
{ assume p hp,
rcases mem_Union.1 hp with ⟨n, hn⟩,
exact (Pu n).2.2 p (finset.mem_coe.1 hn) },
{ have A : ∀ n, μ (s \ ⋃ (p : α × ℝ) (hp : p ∈ ⋃ (n : ℕ), (u n : set (α × ℝ))),
closed_ball p.fst p.snd)
≤ μ (s \ ⋃ (p : α × ℝ) (hp : p ∈ u n), closed_ball p.fst p.snd),
{ assume n,
apply measure_mono,
apply diff_subset_diff (subset.refl _),
exact bUnion_subset_bUnion_left (subset_Union (λ i, (u i : set (α × ℝ))) n) },
have B : ∀ n, μ (s \ ⋃ (p : α × ℝ) (hp : p ∈ u n), closed_ball p.fst p.snd)
≤ (N/(N+1))^n * μ s,
{ assume n,
induction n with n IH,
{ simp only [le_refl, diff_empty, one_mul, Union_false, Union_empty, pow_zero] },
calc
μ (s \ ⋃ (p : α × ℝ) (hp : p ∈ u n.succ), closed_ball p.fst p.snd)
≤ (N/(N+1)) * μ (s \ ⋃ (p : α × ℝ) (hp : p ∈ u n), closed_ball p.fst p.snd) :
by { rw u_succ, exact (hF (u n) (Pu n)).2.2 }
... ≤ (N/(N+1))^n.succ * μ s :
by { rw [pow_succ, mul_assoc], exact ennreal.mul_le_mul le_rfl IH } },
have C : tendsto (λ (n : ℕ), ((N : ℝ≥0∞)/(N+1))^n * μ s) at_top (𝓝 (0 * μ s)),
{ apply ennreal.tendsto.mul_const _ (or.inr (measure_lt_top μ s).ne),
apply ennreal.tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_lt_1,
rw [ennreal.div_lt_iff, one_mul],
{ conv_lhs {rw ← add_zero (N : ℝ≥0∞) },
exact ennreal.add_lt_add_left (ennreal.nat_ne_top N) ennreal.zero_lt_one },
{ simp only [true_or, add_eq_zero_iff, ne.def, not_false_iff, one_ne_zero, and_false] },
{ simp only [ennreal.nat_ne_top, ne.def, not_false_iff, or_true] } },
rw zero_mul at C,
apply le_bot_iff.1,
exact le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto' tendsto_const_nhds C (λ n, (A n).trans (B n)) },
{ refine (pairwise_disjoint_Union _).2 (λ n, (Pu n).1),
apply (monotone_nat_of_le_succ (λ n, _)).directed_le,
rw u_succ,
exact (hF (u n) (Pu n)).1 }
end
/-- The measurable Besicovitch covering theorem. Assume that, for any `x` in a set `s`,
one is given a set of admissible closed balls centered at `x`, with arbitrarily small radii.
Then there exists a disjoint covering of almost all `s` by admissible closed balls centered at some
points of `s`.
This version requires that the underlying measure is sigma-finite, and that the space has the
Besicovitch covering property (which is satisfied for instance by normed real vector spaces).
It expresses the conclusion in a slightly awkward form (with a subset of `α × ℝ`) coming from the
proof technique.
For a version giving the conclusion in a nicer form, see `exists_disjoint_closed_ball_covering_ae`.
-/
theorem exists_disjoint_closed_ball_covering_ae_aux (μ : measure α) [sigma_finite μ]
(f : α → set ℝ) (s : set α) (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).nonempty) :
∃ (t : set (α × ℝ)), t.countable
∧ (∀ (p : α × ℝ), p ∈ t → p.1 ∈ s) ∧ (∀ (p : α × ℝ), p ∈ t → p.2 ∈ f p.1)
∧ μ (s \ (⋃ (p : α × ℝ) (hp : p ∈ t), closed_ball p.1 p.2)) = 0
∧ t.pairwise_disjoint (λ p, closed_ball p.1 p.2) :=
begin
/- This is deduced from the finite measure case, by using a finite measure with respect to which
the initial sigma-finite measure is absolutely continuous. -/
unfreezingI { rcases exists_absolutely_continuous_is_finite_measure μ with ⟨ν, hν, hμν⟩ },
rcases exists_disjoint_closed_ball_covering_ae_of_finite_measure_aux ν f s hf
with ⟨t, t_count, ts, tr, tν, tdisj⟩,
exact ⟨t, t_count, ts, tr, hμν tν, tdisj⟩,
end
/-- The measurable Besicovitch covering theorem. Assume that, for any `x` in a set `s`,
one is given a set of admissible closed balls centered at `x`, with arbitrarily small radii.
Then there exists a disjoint covering of almost all `s` by admissible closed balls centered at some
points of `s`. We can even require that the radius at `x` is bounded by a given function `R x`.
(Take `R = 1` if you don't need this additional feature).
This version requires that the underlying measure is sigma-finite, and that the space has the
Besicovitch covering property (which is satisfied for instance by normed real vector spaces).
-/
theorem exists_disjoint_closed_ball_covering_ae (μ : measure α) [sigma_finite μ]
(f : α → set ℝ) (s : set α) (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).nonempty)
(R : α → ℝ) (hR : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 < R x):
∃ (t : set α) (r : α → ℝ), t.countable ∧ t ⊆ s ∧ (∀ x ∈ t, r x ∈ f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x))
∧ μ (s \ (⋃ (x ∈ t), closed_ball x (r x))) = 0
∧ t.pairwise_disjoint (λ x, closed_ball x (r x)) :=
begin
let g := λ x, f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x),
have hg : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (g x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).nonempty,
{ assume x hx δ δpos,
rcases hf x hx (min δ (R x)) (lt_min δpos (hR x hx)) with ⟨r, hr⟩,
exact ⟨r, ⟨⟨hr.1, hr.2.1, hr.2.2.trans_le (min_le_right _ _)⟩,
⟨hr.2.1, hr.2.2.trans_le (min_le_left _ _)⟩⟩⟩ },
rcases exists_disjoint_closed_ball_covering_ae_aux μ g s hg
with ⟨v, v_count, vs, vg, μv, v_disj⟩,
let t := prod.fst '' v,
have : ∀ x ∈ t, ∃ (r : ℝ), (x, r) ∈ v,
{ assume x hx,
rcases (mem_image _ _ _).1 hx with ⟨⟨p, q⟩, hp, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨q, hp⟩ },
choose! r hr using this,
have im_t : (λ x, (x, r x)) '' t = v,
{ have I : ∀ (p : α × ℝ), p ∈ v → 0 ≤ p.2 :=
λ p hp, (vg p hp).2.1.le,
apply subset.antisymm,
{ simp only [image_subset_iff],
rintros ⟨x, p⟩ hxp,
simp only [mem_preimage],
exact hr _ (mem_image_of_mem _ hxp) },
{ rintros ⟨x, p⟩ hxp,
have hxrx : (x, r x) ∈ v := hr _ (mem_image_of_mem _ hxp),
have : p = r x,
{ by_contra,
have A : (x, p) ≠ (x, r x),
by simpa only [true_and, prod.mk.inj_iff, eq_self_iff_true, ne.def] using h,
have H := v_disj hxp hxrx A,
contrapose H,
rw not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter,
refine ⟨x, by simp [I _ hxp, I _ hxrx]⟩ },
rw this,
apply mem_image_of_mem,
exact mem_image_of_mem _ hxp } },
refine ⟨t, r, v_count.image _, _, _, _, _⟩,
{ assume x hx,
rcases (mem_image _ _ _).1 hx with ⟨⟨p, q⟩, hp, rfl⟩,
exact vs _ hp },
{ assume x hx,
rcases (mem_image _ _ _).1 hx with ⟨⟨p, q⟩, hp, rfl⟩,
exact vg _ (hr _ hx) },
{ have : (⋃ (x : α) (H : x ∈ t), closed_ball x (r x)) =
(⋃ (p : α × ℝ) (H : p ∈ (λ x, (x, r x)) '' t), closed_ball p.1 p.2),
by conv_rhs { rw bUnion_image },
rw [this, im_t],
exact μv },
{ have A : inj_on (λ x : α, (x, r x)) t,
by simp only [inj_on, prod.mk.inj_iff, implies_true_iff, eq_self_iff_true] {contextual := tt},
rwa [← im_t, A.pairwise_disjoint_image] at v_disj }
end
/-- In a space with the Besicovitch property, any set `s` can be covered with balls whose measures
add up to at most `μ s + ε`, for any positive `ε`. This works even if one restricts the set of
allowed radii around a point `x` to a set `f x` which accumulates at `0`. -/
theorem exists_closed_ball_covering_tsum_measure_le
(μ : measure α) [sigma_finite μ] [measure.outer_regular μ]
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) (f : α → set ℝ) (s : set α)
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).nonempty) :
∃ (t : set α) (r : α → ℝ), t.countable ∧ t ⊆ s ∧ (∀ x ∈ t, r x ∈ f x)
∧ s ⊆ (⋃ (x ∈ t), closed_ball x (r x))
∧ ∑' (x : t), μ (closed_ball x (r x)) ≤ μ s + ε :=
begin
/- For the proof, first cover almost all `s` with disjoint balls thanks to the usual Besicovitch
theorem. Taking the balls included in a well-chosen open neighborhood `u` of `s`, one may
ensure that their measures add at most to `μ s + ε / 2`. Let `s'` be the remaining set, of measure
`0`. Applying the other version of Besicovitch, one may cover it with at most `N` disjoint
subfamilies. Making sure that they are all included in a neighborhood `v` of `s'` of measure at
most `ε / (2 N)`, the sum of their measures is at most `ε / 2`, completing the proof. -/
obtain ⟨u, su, u_open, μu⟩ : ∃ U ⊇ s, is_open U ∧ μ U ≤ μ s + ε / 2 :=
set.exists_is_open_le_add _ _ (by simpa only [or_false, ne.def, ennreal.div_zero_iff,
ennreal.one_ne_top, ennreal.bit0_eq_top_iff] using hε),
have : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ R > 0, ball x R ⊆ u :=
λ x hx, metric.mem_nhds_iff.1 (u_open.mem_nhds (su hx)),
choose! R hR using this,
obtain ⟨t0, r0, t0_count, t0s, hr0, μt0, t0_disj⟩ :
∃ (t0 : set α) (r0 : α → ℝ), t0.countable ∧ t0 ⊆ s ∧ (∀ x ∈ t0, r0 x ∈ f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x))
∧ μ (s \ (⋃ (x ∈ t0), closed_ball x (r0 x))) = 0
∧ t0.pairwise_disjoint (λ x, closed_ball x (r0 x)) :=
exists_disjoint_closed_ball_covering_ae μ f s hf R (λ x hx, (hR x hx).1),
-- we have constructed an almost everywhere covering of `s` by disjoint balls. Let `s'` be the
-- remaining set.
let s' := s \ (⋃ (x ∈ t0), closed_ball x (r0 x)),
have s's : s' ⊆ s := diff_subset _ _,
obtain ⟨N, τ, hτ, H⟩ : ∃ N τ, 1 < τ ∧ is_empty (besicovitch.satellite_config α N τ) :=
has_besicovitch_covering.no_satellite_config α,
obtain ⟨v, s'v, v_open, μv⟩ : ∃ v ⊇ s', is_open v ∧ μ v ≤ μ s' + (ε / 2) / N :=
set.exists_is_open_le_add _ _
(by simp only [hε, ennreal.nat_ne_top, with_top.mul_eq_top_iff, ne.def, ennreal.div_zero_iff,
ennreal.one_ne_top, not_false_iff, and_false, false_and, or_self, ennreal.bit0_eq_top_iff]),
have : ∀ x ∈ s', ∃ r1 ∈ (f x ∩ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1), closed_ball x r1 ⊆ v,
{ assume x hx,
rcases metric.mem_nhds_iff.1 (v_open.mem_nhds (s'v hx)) with ⟨r, rpos, hr⟩,
rcases hf x (s's hx) (min r 1) (lt_min rpos zero_lt_one) with ⟨R', hR'⟩,
exact ⟨R', ⟨hR'.1, hR'.2.1, hR'.2.2.trans_le (min_le_right _ _)⟩,
subset.trans (closed_ball_subset_ball (hR'.2.2.trans_le (min_le_left _ _))) hr⟩, },
choose! r1 hr1 using this,
let q : ball_package s' α :=
{ c := λ x, x,
r := λ x, r1 x,
rpos := λ x, (hr1 x.1 x.2).1.2.1,
r_bound := 1,
r_le := λ x, (hr1 x.1 x.2).1.2.2.le },
-- by Besicovitch, we cover `s'` with at most `N` families of disjoint balls, all included in
-- a suitable neighborhood `v` of `s'`.
obtain ⟨S, S_disj, hS⟩ : ∃ S : fin N → set s',
(∀ (i : fin N), (S i).pairwise_disjoint (λ j, closed_ball (q.c j) (q.r j))) ∧
(range q.c ⊆ ⋃ (i : fin N), ⋃ (j ∈ S i), ball (q.c j) (q.r j)) :=
exist_disjoint_covering_families hτ H q,
have S_count : ∀ i, (S i).countable,
{ assume i,
apply (S_disj i).countable_of_nonempty_interior (λ j hj, _),
have : (ball (j : α) (r1 j)).nonempty := nonempty_ball.2 (q.rpos _),
exact this.mono ball_subset_interior_closed_ball },
let r := λ x, if x ∈ s' then r1 x else r0 x,
have r_t0 : ∀ x ∈ t0, r x = r0 x,
{ assume x hx,
have : ¬ (x ∈ s'),
{ simp only [not_exists, exists_prop, mem_Union, mem_closed_ball, not_and, not_lt,
not_le, mem_diff, not_forall],
assume h'x,
refine ⟨x, hx, _⟩,
rw dist_self,
exact (hr0 x hx).2.1.le },
simp only [r, if_neg this] },
-- the desired covering set is given by the union of the families constructed in the first and
-- second steps.
refine ⟨t0 ∪ (⋃ (i : fin N), (coe : s' → α) '' (S i)), r, _, _, _, _, _⟩,
-- it remains to check that they have the desired properties
{ exact t0_count.union (countable_Union (λ i, (S_count i).image _)) },
{ simp only [t0s, true_and, union_subset_iff, image_subset_iff, Union_subset_iff],
assume i x hx,
exact s's x.2 },
{ assume x hx,
cases hx,
{ rw r_t0 x hx,
exact (hr0 _ hx).1 },
{ have h'x : x ∈ s',
{ simp only [mem_Union, mem_image] at hx,
rcases hx with ⟨i, y, ySi, rfl⟩,
exact y.2 },
simp only [r, if_pos h'x, (hr1 x h'x).1.1] } },
{ assume x hx,
by_cases h'x : x ∈ s',
{ obtain ⟨i, y, ySi, xy⟩ : ∃ (i : fin N) (y : ↥s') (ySi : y ∈ S i), x ∈ ball (y : α) (r1 y),
{ have A : x ∈ range q.c, by simpa only [not_exists, exists_prop, mem_Union, mem_closed_ball,
not_and, not_le, mem_set_of_eq, subtype.range_coe_subtype, mem_diff] using h'x,
simpa only [mem_Union, mem_image] using hS A },
refine mem_Union₂.2 ⟨y, or.inr _, _⟩,
{ simp only [mem_Union, mem_image],
exact ⟨i, y, ySi, rfl⟩ },
{ have : (y : α) ∈ s' := y.2,
simp only [r, if_pos this],
exact ball_subset_closed_ball xy } },
{ obtain ⟨y, yt0, hxy⟩ : ∃ (y : α), y ∈ t0 ∧ x ∈ closed_ball y (r0 y),
by simpa [hx, -mem_closed_ball] using h'x,
refine mem_Union₂.2 ⟨y, or.inl yt0, _⟩,
rwa r_t0 _ yt0 } },
-- the only nontrivial property is the measure control, which we check now
{ -- the sets in the first step have measure at most `μ s + ε / 2`
have A : ∑' (x : t0), μ (closed_ball x (r x)) ≤ μ s + ε / 2 := calc
∑' (x : t0), μ (closed_ball x (r x))
= ∑' (x : t0), μ (closed_ball x (r0 x)) :
by { congr' 1, ext x, rw r_t0 x x.2 }
... = μ (⋃ (x : t0), closed_ball x (r0 x)) :
begin
haveI : encodable t0 := t0_count.to_encodable,
rw measure_Union,
{ exact (pairwise_subtype_iff_pairwise_set _ _).2 t0_disj },
{ exact λ i, measurable_set_closed_ball }
end
... ≤ μ u :
begin
apply measure_mono,
simp only [set_coe.forall, subtype.coe_mk, Union_subset_iff],
assume x hx,
apply subset.trans (closed_ball_subset_ball (hr0 x hx).2.2) (hR x (t0s hx)).2,
end
... ≤ μ s + ε / 2 : μu,
-- each subfamily in the second step has measure at most `ε / (2 N)`.
have B : ∀ (i : fin N),
∑' (x : (coe : s' → α) '' (S i)), μ (closed_ball x (r x)) ≤ (ε / 2) / N := λ i, calc
∑' (x : (coe : s' → α) '' (S i)), μ (closed_ball x (r x)) =
∑' (x : S i), μ (closed_ball x (r x)) :
begin
have : inj_on (coe : s' → α) (S i) := subtype.coe_injective.inj_on _,
let F : S i ≃ (coe : s' → α) '' (S i) := this.bij_on_image.equiv _,
exact (F.tsum_eq (λ x, μ (closed_ball x (r x)))).symm,
end
... = ∑' (x : S i), μ (closed_ball x (r1 x)) :
by { congr' 1, ext x, have : (x : α) ∈ s' := x.1.2, simp only [r, if_pos this] }
... = μ (⋃ (x : S i), closed_ball x (r1 x)) :
begin
haveI : encodable (S i) := (S_count i).to_encodable,
rw measure_Union,
{ exact (pairwise_subtype_iff_pairwise_set _ _).2 (S_disj i) },
{ exact λ i, measurable_set_closed_ball }
end
... ≤ μ v :
begin
apply measure_mono,
simp only [set_coe.forall, subtype.coe_mk, Union_subset_iff],
assume x xs' xSi,
exact (hr1 x xs').2,
end
... ≤ (ε / 2) / N : by { have : μ s' = 0 := μt0, rwa [this, zero_add] at μv },
-- add up all these to prove the desired estimate
calc ∑' (x : (t0 ∪ ⋃ (i : fin N), (coe : s' → α) '' S i)), μ (closed_ball x (r x))
≤ ∑' (x : t0), μ (closed_ball x (r x))
+ ∑' (x : ⋃ (i : fin N), (coe : s' → α) '' S i), μ (closed_ball x (r x)) :
ennreal.tsum_union_le (λ x, μ (closed_ball x (r x))) _ _
... ≤ ∑' (x : t0), μ (closed_ball x (r x))
+ ∑ (i : fin N), ∑' (x : (coe : s' → α) '' S i), μ (closed_ball x (r x)) :
add_le_add le_rfl (ennreal.tsum_Union_le (λ x, μ (closed_ball x (r x))) _)
... ≤ (μ s + ε / 2) + ∑ (i : fin N), (ε / 2) / N :
begin
refine add_le_add A _,
refine finset.sum_le_sum _,
assume i hi,
exact B i
end
... ≤ (μ s + ε / 2) + ε / 2 :
begin
refine add_le_add le_rfl _,
simp only [finset.card_fin, finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul, ennreal.mul_div_le],
end
... = μ s + ε : by rw [add_assoc, ennreal.add_halves] }
end
/-! ### Consequences on differentiation of measures -/
/-- In a space with the Besicovitch covering property, the set of closed balls with positive radius
forms a Vitali family. This is essentially a restatement of the measurable Besicovitch theorem. -/
protected def vitali_family (μ : measure α) [sigma_finite μ] :
vitali_family μ :=
{ sets_at := λ x, (λ (r : ℝ), closed_ball x r) '' (Ioi (0 : ℝ)),
measurable_set' := begin
assume x y hy,
obtain ⟨r, rpos, rfl⟩ : ∃ (r : ℝ), 0 < r ∧ closed_ball x r = y,
by simpa only [mem_image, mem_Ioi] using hy,
exact is_closed_ball.measurable_set
end,
nonempty_interior := begin
assume x y hy,
obtain ⟨r, rpos, rfl⟩ : ∃ (r : ℝ), 0 < r ∧ closed_ball x r = y,
by simpa only [mem_image, mem_Ioi] using hy,
simp only [nonempty.mono ball_subset_interior_closed_ball, rpos, nonempty_ball],
end,
nontrivial := λ x ε εpos, ⟨closed_ball x ε, mem_image_of_mem _ εpos, subset.refl _⟩,
covering := begin
assume s f fsubset ffine,
let g : α → set ℝ := λ x, {r | 0 < r ∧ closed_ball x r ∈ f x},
have A : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (g x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).nonempty,
{ assume x xs δ δpos,
obtain ⟨t, tf, ht⟩ : ∃ (t : set α) (H : t ∈ f x), t ⊆ closed_ball x (δ/2) :=
ffine x xs (δ/2) (half_pos δpos),
obtain ⟨r, rpos, rfl⟩ : ∃ (r : ℝ), 0 < r ∧ closed_ball x r = t,
by simpa using fsubset x xs tf,
rcases le_total r (δ/2) with H|H,
{ exact ⟨r, ⟨rpos, tf⟩, ⟨rpos, H.trans_lt (half_lt_self δpos)⟩⟩ },
{ have : closed_ball x r = closed_ball x (δ/2) :=
subset.antisymm ht (closed_ball_subset_closed_ball H),
rw this at tf,
refine ⟨δ/2, ⟨half_pos δpos, tf⟩, ⟨half_pos δpos, half_lt_self δpos⟩⟩ } },
obtain ⟨t, r, t_count, ts, tg, μt, tdisj⟩ : ∃ (t : set α) (r : α → ℝ), t.countable
∧ t ⊆ s ∧ (∀ x ∈ t, r x ∈ g x ∩ Ioo 0 1)
∧ μ (s \ (⋃ (x ∈ t), closed_ball x (r x))) = 0
∧ t.pairwise_disjoint (λ x, closed_ball x (r x)) :=
exists_disjoint_closed_ball_covering_ae μ g s A (λ _, 1) (λ _ _, zero_lt_one),
let F : α → α × set α := λ x, (x, closed_ball x (r x)),
refine ⟨F '' t, _, _, _, _⟩,
{ rintros - ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩, exact ts hx },
{ rintros p ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ q ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ hxy,
exact tdisj hx hy (ne_of_apply_ne F hxy) },
{ rintros - ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩, exact (tg x hx).1.2 },
{ rwa bUnion_image }
end }
/-- The main feature of the Besicovitch Vitali family is that its filter at a point `x` corresponds
to convergence along closed balls. We record one of the two implications here, which will enable us
to deduce specific statements on differentiation of measures in this context from the general
versions. -/
lemma tendsto_filter_at (μ : measure α) [sigma_finite μ] (x : α) :
tendsto (λ r, closed_ball x r) (𝓝[>] 0) ((besicovitch.vitali_family μ).filter_at x) :=
begin
assume s hs,
simp only [mem_map],
obtain ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩ : ∃ (ε : ℝ) (H : ε > 0), ∀ (a : set α),
a ∈ (besicovitch.vitali_family μ).sets_at x → a ⊆ closed_ball x ε → a ∈ s :=
(vitali_family.mem_filter_at_iff _).1 hs,
have : Ioc (0 : ℝ) ε ∈ 𝓝[>] (0 : ℝ) := Ioc_mem_nhds_within_Ioi ⟨le_rfl, εpos⟩,
filter_upwards [this] with _ hr,
apply hε,
{ exact mem_image_of_mem _ hr.1 },
{ exact closed_ball_subset_closed_ball hr.2 }
end
variables [metric_space β] [measurable_space β] [borel_space β] [second_countable_topology β]
[has_besicovitch_covering β]
/-- In a space with the Besicovitch covering property, the ratio of the measure of balls converges
almost surely to to the Radon-Nikodym derivative. -/
lemma ae_tendsto_rn_deriv
(ρ μ : measure β) [is_locally_finite_measure μ] [is_locally_finite_measure ρ] :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, tendsto (λ r, ρ (closed_ball x r) / μ (closed_ball x r))
(𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 (ρ.rn_deriv μ x)) :=
begin
filter_upwards [vitali_family.ae_tendsto_rn_deriv (besicovitch.vitali_family μ) ρ] with x hx,
exact hx.comp (tendsto_filter_at μ x)
end
/-- Given a measurable set `s`, then `μ (s ∩ closed_ball x r) / μ (closed_ball x r)` converges when
`r` tends to `0`, for almost every `x`. The limit is `1` for `x ∈ s` and `0` for `x ∉ s`.
This shows that almost every point of `s` is a Lebesgue density point for `s`.
A version for non-measurable sets holds, but it only gives the first conclusion,
see `ae_tendsto_measure_inter_div`. -/
lemma ae_tendsto_measure_inter_div_of_measurable_set
(μ : measure β) [is_locally_finite_measure μ] {s : set β} (hs : measurable_set s) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, tendsto (λ r, μ (s ∩ closed_ball x r) / μ (closed_ball x r))
(𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 (s.indicator 1 x)) :=
begin
filter_upwards [vitali_family.ae_tendsto_measure_inter_div_of_measurable_set
(besicovitch.vitali_family μ) hs],
assume x hx,
exact hx.comp (tendsto_filter_at μ x)
end
/-- Given an arbitrary set `s`, then `μ (s ∩ closed_ball x r) / μ (closed_ball x r)` converges
to `1` when `r` tends to `0`, for almost every `x` in `s`.
This shows that almost every point of `s` is a Lebesgue density point for `s`.
A stronger version holds for measurable sets, see `ae_tendsto_measure_inter_div_of_measurable_set`.
See also `is_doubling_measure.ae_tendsto_measure_inter_div`. -/
lemma ae_tendsto_measure_inter_div (μ : measure β) [is_locally_finite_measure μ] (s : set β) :
∀ᵐ x ∂(μ.restrict s), tendsto (λ r, μ (s ∩ (closed_ball x r)) / μ (closed_ball x r))
(𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 1) :=
by filter_upwards [vitali_family.ae_tendsto_measure_inter_div (besicovitch.vitali_family μ)]
with x hx using hx.comp (tendsto_filter_at μ x)
end besicovitch
|
b8085d380065ded14e618227ebec94cf83cdaa8e | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/algebra/order/field/power.lean | aa69291ff6968abac370dc38036b3bb31e2b7349 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,692 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Robert Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Lewis, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import algebra.parity
import algebra.char_zero.lemmas
import algebra.group_with_zero.power
import algebra.order.field.basic
/-!
# Lemmas about powers in ordered fields.
-/
variables {α : Type*}
open function
section linear_ordered_semifield
variables [linear_ordered_semifield α] {a b c d e : α} {m n : ℤ}
/-! ### Integer powers -/
lemma zpow_le_of_le (ha : 1 ≤ a) (h : m ≤ n) : a ^ m ≤ a ^ n :=
begin
have ha₀ : 0 < a, from one_pos.trans_le ha,
lift n - m to ℕ using sub_nonneg.2 h with k hk,
calc a ^ m = a ^ m * 1 : (mul_one _).symm
... ≤ a ^ m * a ^ k : mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (one_le_pow_of_one_le ha _) (zpow_nonneg ha₀.le _)
... = a ^ n : by rw [← zpow_coe_nat, ← zpow_add₀ ha₀.ne', hk, add_sub_cancel'_right]
end
lemma zpow_le_one_of_nonpos (ha : 1 ≤ a) (hn : n ≤ 0) : a ^ n ≤ 1 :=
(zpow_le_of_le ha hn).trans_eq $ zpow_zero _
lemma one_le_zpow_of_nonneg (ha : 1 ≤ a) (hn : 0 ≤ n) : 1 ≤ a ^ n :=
(zpow_zero _).symm.trans_le $ zpow_le_of_le ha hn
protected lemma nat.zpow_pos_of_pos {a : ℕ} (h : 0 < a) (n : ℤ) : 0 < (a : α)^n :=
by { apply zpow_pos_of_pos, exact_mod_cast h }
lemma nat.zpow_ne_zero_of_pos {a : ℕ} (h : 0 < a) (n : ℤ) : (a : α)^n ≠ 0 :=
(nat.zpow_pos_of_pos h n).ne'
lemma one_lt_zpow (ha : 1 < a) : ∀ n : ℤ, 0 < n → 1 < a ^ n
| (n : ℕ) h := (zpow_coe_nat _ _).symm.subst (one_lt_pow ha $ int.coe_nat_ne_zero.mp h.ne')
| -[1+ n] h := ((int.neg_succ_not_pos _).mp h).elim
lemma zpow_strict_mono (hx : 1 < a) : strict_mono ((^) a : ℤ → α) :=
strict_mono_int_of_lt_succ $ λ n,
have xpos : 0 < a, from zero_lt_one.trans hx,
calc a ^ n < a ^ n * a : lt_mul_of_one_lt_right (zpow_pos_of_pos xpos _) hx
... = a ^ (n + 1) : (zpow_add_one₀ xpos.ne' _).symm
lemma zpow_strict_anti (h₀ : 0 < a) (h₁ : a < 1) : strict_anti ((^) a : ℤ → α) :=
strict_anti_int_of_succ_lt $ λ n,
calc a ^ (n + 1) = a ^ n * a : zpow_add_one₀ h₀.ne' _
... < a ^ n * 1 : (mul_lt_mul_left $ zpow_pos_of_pos h₀ _).2 h₁
... = a ^ n : mul_one _
@[simp] lemma zpow_lt_iff_lt (hx : 1 < a) : a ^ m < a ^ n ↔ m < n := (zpow_strict_mono hx).lt_iff_lt
@[simp] lemma zpow_le_iff_le (hx : 1 < a) : a ^ m ≤ a ^ n ↔ m ≤ n := (zpow_strict_mono hx).le_iff_le
@[simp] lemma div_pow_le (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 1 ≤ b) (k : ℕ) : a/b^k ≤ a :=
div_le_self ha $ one_le_pow_of_one_le hb _
lemma zpow_injective (h₀ : 0 < a) (h₁ : a ≠ 1) : injective ((^) a : ℤ → α) :=
begin
rcases h₁.lt_or_lt with H|H,
{ exact (zpow_strict_anti h₀ H).injective },
{ exact (zpow_strict_mono H).injective }
end
@[simp] lemma zpow_inj (h₀ : 0 < a) (h₁ : a ≠ 1) : a ^ m = a ^ n ↔ m = n :=
(zpow_injective h₀ h₁).eq_iff
lemma zpow_le_max_of_min_le {x : α} (hx : 1 ≤ x) {a b c : ℤ} (h : min a b ≤ c) :
x ^ -c ≤ max (x ^ -a) (x ^ -b) :=
begin
have : antitone (λ n : ℤ, x ^ -n) := λ m n h, zpow_le_of_le hx (neg_le_neg h),
exact (this h).trans_eq this.map_min,
end
lemma zpow_le_max_iff_min_le {x : α} (hx : 1 < x) {a b c : ℤ} :
x ^ -c ≤ max (x ^ -a) (x ^ -b) ↔ min a b ≤ c :=
by simp_rw [le_max_iff, min_le_iff, zpow_le_iff_le hx, neg_le_neg_iff]
end linear_ordered_semifield
section linear_ordered_field
variables [linear_ordered_field α] {a b c d : α} {n : ℤ}
/-! ### Lemmas about powers to numerals. -/
lemma zpow_bit0_nonneg (a : α) (n : ℤ) : 0 ≤ a ^ bit0 n :=
(mul_self_nonneg _).trans_eq $ (zpow_bit0 _ _).symm
lemma zpow_two_nonneg (a : α) : 0 ≤ a ^ (2 : ℤ) := zpow_bit0_nonneg _ _
lemma zpow_bit0_pos (h : a ≠ 0) (n : ℤ) : 0 < a ^ bit0 n :=
(zpow_bit0_nonneg a n).lt_of_ne (zpow_ne_zero _ h).symm
lemma zpow_two_pos_of_ne_zero (h : a ≠ 0) : 0 < a ^ (2 : ℤ) := zpow_bit0_pos h _
@[simp] lemma zpow_bit0_pos_iff (hn : n ≠ 0) : 0 < a ^ bit0 n ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
⟨by { rintro h rfl, refine (zero_zpow _ _).not_gt h, rwa bit0_ne_zero }, λ h, zpow_bit0_pos h _⟩
@[simp] lemma zpow_bit1_neg_iff : a ^ bit1 n < 0 ↔ a < 0 :=
⟨λ h, not_le.1 $ λ h', not_le.2 h $ zpow_nonneg h' _,
λ h, by rw [bit1, zpow_add_one₀ h.ne]; exact mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg (zpow_bit0_pos h.ne _) h⟩
@[simp] lemma zpow_bit1_nonneg_iff : 0 ≤ a ^ bit1 n ↔ 0 ≤ a :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 zpow_bit1_neg_iff
@[simp] lemma zpow_bit1_nonpos_iff : a ^ bit1 n ≤ 0 ↔ a ≤ 0 :=
by rw [le_iff_lt_or_eq, le_iff_lt_or_eq, zpow_bit1_neg_iff, zpow_eq_zero_iff (int.bit1_ne_zero n)]
@[simp] lemma zpow_bit1_pos_iff : 0 < a ^ bit1 n ↔ 0 < a :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le zpow_bit1_nonpos_iff
protected lemma even.zpow_nonneg (hn : even n) (a : α) : 0 ≤ a ^ n :=
by obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := hn; exact zpow_bit0_nonneg _ _
lemma even.zpow_pos_iff (hn : even n) (h : n ≠ 0) : 0 < a ^ n ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
by obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := hn; exact zpow_bit0_pos_iff (by rintro rfl; simpa using h)
lemma odd.zpow_neg_iff (hn : odd n) : a ^ n < 0 ↔ a < 0 :=
by cases hn with k hk; simpa only [hk, two_mul] using zpow_bit1_neg_iff
protected lemma odd.zpow_nonneg_iff (hn : odd n) : 0 ≤ a ^ n ↔ 0 ≤ a :=
by cases hn with k hk; simpa only [hk, two_mul] using zpow_bit1_nonneg_iff
lemma odd.zpow_nonpos_iff (hn : odd n) : a ^ n ≤ 0 ↔ a ≤ 0 :=
by cases hn with k hk; simpa only [hk, two_mul] using zpow_bit1_nonpos_iff
lemma odd.zpow_pos_iff (hn : odd n) : 0 < a ^ n ↔ 0 < a :=
by cases hn with k hk; simpa only [hk, two_mul] using zpow_bit1_pos_iff
alias even.zpow_pos_iff ↔ _ even.zpow_pos
alias odd.zpow_neg_iff ↔ _ odd.zpow_neg
alias odd.zpow_nonpos_iff ↔ _ odd.zpow_nonpos
lemma even.zpow_abs {p : ℤ} (hp : even p) (a : α) : |a| ^ p = a ^ p :=
by cases abs_choice a with h h; simp only [h, hp.neg_zpow _]
@[simp] lemma zpow_bit0_abs (a : α) (p : ℤ) : |a| ^ bit0 p = a ^ bit0 p := (even_bit0 _).zpow_abs _
/-! ### Miscellaneous lemmmas -/
/-- Bernoulli's inequality reformulated to estimate `(n : α)`. -/
lemma nat.cast_le_pow_sub_div_sub (H : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) : (n : α) ≤ (a ^ n - 1) / (a - 1) :=
(le_div_iff (sub_pos.2 H)).2 $ le_sub_left_of_add_le $
one_add_mul_sub_le_pow ((neg_le_self zero_le_one).trans H.le) _
/-- For any `a > 1` and a natural `n` we have `n ≤ a ^ n / (a - 1)`. See also
`nat.cast_le_pow_sub_div_sub` for a stronger inequality with `a ^ n - 1` in the numerator. -/
theorem nat.cast_le_pow_div_sub (H : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) : (n : α) ≤ a ^ n / (a - 1) :=
(n.cast_le_pow_sub_div_sub H).trans $ div_le_div_of_le (sub_nonneg.2 H.le)
(sub_le_self _ zero_le_one)
end linear_ordered_field
|
71defb9ad58abc3e51cc5d12b0568989a73a33ab | 53f7fd7840fe4979de24f9611c89f2ee1b4fc5dc | /src/backtrack.lean | 0cb182c83ffc425f51b21bf1330796737559ddcc | [] | no_license | cipher1024/search-trees | 6d1925283c6ce47d84bdf41ca40d8317ff2e64d7 | 0e0ea0ee59f0b0499ebad1ef6f34f09ec9666cde | refs/heads/master | 1,673,300,158,759 | 1,603,984,112,000 | 1,603,984,112,000 | 308,132,998 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 989 | lean |
import control.monad.cont
open tactic
namespace tactic
-- this should probably be PR-ed
meta def bt_tac (α : Type) :=
∀ r, cont_t r tactic α
meta instance : monad bt_tac :=
{ pure := λ α x r, pure x,
bind := λ α β x f r, x r >>= λ a, f a r }
meta instance bt_tac.alternative : alternative bt_tac :=
{ failure := λ α r _, failure,
orelse := λ α x y r f, x _ f <|> y _ f }
meta def run_bt {α} (x : bt_tac α) : tactic α :=
x _ pure
meta def bt_lift {α} (x : tactic α) : bt_tac α :=
λ r f, x >>= f
meta def var : bt_tac expr :=
bt_lift mk_mvar
meta def hyp (p : pexpr) : bt_tac expr := do
p ← bt_lift $ to_expr p,
ls ← bt_lift local_context,
ls.mfirst $ λ h, bt_lift $ do
t ← infer_type h,
h <$ unify t p
meta def hyp_with (p : pexpr) : bt_tac (expr × expr) := do
p ← bt_lift $ to_expr p,
ls ← bt_lift local_context,
ls.mfirst $ λ h, bt_lift $ do
t ← infer_type h,
e ← kabstract t p,
guard $ e.has_var,
pure (h, e)
end tactic
|
0d7fcbd9e20676aa3a2530ed655c81f3c6384b39 | 43390109ab88557e6090f3245c47479c123ee500 | /src/M1F/problem_bank/0201/S0201.lean | e23ab6a4c0a60f2645c7492a9a3b761ea4b01b52 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Ja1941/xena-UROP-2018 | 41f0956519f94d56b8bf6834a8d39473f4923200 | b111fb87f343cf79eca3b886f99ee15c1dd9884b | refs/heads/master | 1,662,355,955,139 | 1,590,577,325,000 | 1,590,577,325,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 19,037 | lean | import xenalib.M1Fstuff algebra.group_power xenalib.square_root
-- automatic coercions to reals
section M1F_Sheet02
-- #check arbitrary
-- #print arbitrary
-- #check default
-- #print default
-- ask about this
/-
example : arbitrary = default :=
begin
unfold eq,
end
-/
-- set_option pp.all true
def countable_union_from_zero {α : Type} (X : nat → set α ) := { t : α | exists i, t ∈ X i}
def countable_union_from_one {α : Type} (X : nat → set α ) := { t : α | exists i, i > 0 ∧ t ∈ X i}
def Q1a_sets : ℕ → set ℝ := λ n x, ↑n ≤ x ∧ x < (n+1)
-- #check Q1a_sets
/-
def Q1a_sets2 : ℕ → set ℝ := λ n, { x | ↑ n ≤ x ∧ x < (n+1)}
example : Q1a_sets = Q1a_sets2 :=
begin
apply funext,
intro n,
unfold Q1a_sets,
unfold Q1a_sets2,
apply funext,
intro x,unfold set_of,
end
-/
-- set_option pp.all true
theorem Q1a : countable_union_from_zero Q1a_sets = { x | 0 ≤ x} :=
begin
unfold countable_union_from_zero,
unfold Q1a_sets,
apply funext,
intro x,
unfold set_of,
have H : ∃ (n : ℤ), ↑n ≤ x ∧ x < ↑n + 1,
exact M1F.floor_real_exists x,
apply propext,
split,
intro H2,
cases H2 with i H3,
have H4 : ↑i ≤ x,
exact H3.left,
have H5 : (0:ℤ) ≤ ↑i,
exact int.coe_zero_le i,
apply le_trans _ H4,
simp [H5],
intro H2,
cases H with n H3,
have H4 : ((0:ℤ):ℝ) < (n:real) +(1:real),
exact lt_of_le_of_lt H2 H3.right,
have H5 : ((0:ℤ):ℝ) < (n:ℝ) + ((1:ℤ):ℝ),
rw [int.cast_one], exact H4,
clear H4,
-- rw [←int.cast_add] at H4,
-- have H5 : (0:ℤ) < n + of_rat(1),
-- exact H4,
-- rw [of_rat_add,of_rat_lt] at H5,
-- clear H4,
rw [←int.cast_add,int.cast_lt] at H5,
rw [int.lt_iff_add_one_le] at H5,
simp at H5,
have H : ∃ (n_1 : ℕ), n = ↑n_1,
exact int.eq_coe_of_zero_le H5,
cases H with i H4,
clear H5 H2,
existsi i,
split,
exact calc (i:ℝ) = ((i:ℤ):ℝ) : by simp
... = (n:ℝ) : int.cast_inj.mpr (eq.symm H4)
... ≤ x : H3.left,
suffices H : (↑n : ℝ) = (↑i : ℝ),
rw [←H],exact H3.right,
rw [H4],
refl,
end
/-
def Q1b_sets : ℕ → set ℝ := λ n x, 1/(↑n) ≤ x ∧ x ≤ 1
-- set_option pp.notation false
-- set_option class.instance_max_depth
-- set_option pp.all true
theorem Q1b : countable_union_from_one Q1b_sets = { x | 0 < x ∧ x ≤ 1} :=
begin
unfold countable_union_from_one,
unfold Q1b_sets,
apply funext,
intro x,
unfold set_of,
apply propext,
split;intro H,
cases H with i Hi,
split,
tactic.swap,
exact Hi.right.right,
suffices H2 : (0:ℝ) < 1/(↑i),
exact lt_of_lt_of_le H2 Hi.right.left,
-- have H3 : of_rat (((0:nat):int):rat) < of_rat ((i:int):rat),
-- rw [of_rat_lt,rat.coe_int_lt,int.coe_nat_lt_coe_nat_iff],
-- exact Hi.left,
rw [←int.cast_zero],
exact lt_div_of_mul_lt (nat.cast_lt.mpr Hi.left) (by simp [zero_lt_one]),
have H2 : 0 < 1/x,
exact lt_div_of_mul_lt H.left (by simp [zero_lt_one]),
have H3 : ∃ (n : ℤ), ↑n ≤ 1 / x ∧ 1 / x < ↑n + 1,
exact M1F.floor_real_exists (1/x),
cases H3 with n Hn,
have H3 : (0:ℝ) < (n:ℝ) + (1:ℝ),
exact lt_of_lt_of_le H2 (le_of_lt Hn.right),
rw [←int.cast_one,←int.cast_add,←int.cast_zero,int.cast_lt,int.lt_iff_add_one_le] at H3,
have H4 : ↑0 ≤ n,
apply le_of_add_le_add_right H3,
cases n with nnat nfalse,
tactic.swap,
have H5 : (0:ℤ) < (0:ℤ),
exact calc (0:ℤ) ≤ int.neg_succ_of_nat nfalse : H4
... < 0 : int.neg_succ_of_nat_lt_zero nfalse,
exfalso,
apply H5,
clear H3 H4,
existsi (nnat+1),
split,
exact calc 0< nat.succ nnat : nat.zero_lt_succ nnat
... = nnat+1 : rfl,
split,
tactic.swap,
exact H.right,
have H4 : x > 0,
unfold gt,exact H.left,
have H5 : nnat+1>0,
exact (nat.zero_lt_succ nnat),
have H6 : (((nnat+1):ℕ):ℝ) > 0,
exact nat.cast_lt.mpr H5,
have H7 : ((int.of_nat nnat):ℝ) + 1 = (((nnat+1):ℕ):ℝ), simp,
have Hnr : 1 / x < ↑(int.of_nat nnat) + 1,
exact Hn.right,
rw [H7] at Hnr,
clear Hn H5,
suffices H5 : 1 ≤ ↑(nnat+1)*x,
exact div_le_of_le_mul H6 H5,
exact (div_le_iff_le_mul_of_pos H4).mp (le_of_lt Hnr)
end
def Q1c_sets : ℕ → set ℝ := λ n x, -↑n < x ∧ x < n
-- #check max,
theorem Q1c : countable_union_from_one Q1c_sets = { x | true } :=
begin
unfold countable_union_from_one,
unfold Q1c_sets,
apply funext,
intro x,
unfold set_of,
apply propext,
split;intro H,
trivial,
have H2 : ∃ (n : ℤ), ↑n ≤ x ∧ x < ↑n + 1,
exact M1F.floor_real_exists x,
have H3 : ∃ (m : ℤ), ↑m ≤ (-x) ∧ (-x) < ↑m + 1,
exact M1F.floor_real_exists (-x),
cases H2 with n Hn,
cases H3 with m Hm,
let iz:ℤ := max (1:ℤ) (max (n+1) ((m+1))),
have H4 : iz ≥ 1,
exact le_max_left (1:ℤ) _,
have H5 : ∃ (i:ℕ), iz=i,
exact int.eq_coe_of_zero_le (le_trans (le_of_lt (zero_lt_one)) H4),
cases H5 with i Hi,
existsi i,
split,
suffices H1 : 0<i,
exact H1,
rw [←int.coe_nat_lt_coe_nat_iff,←Hi],
exact lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one H4,
split,
suffices H1 : -↑i ≤ -(↑m + (1:ℝ)),
exact lt_of_le_of_lt H1 (neg_lt.mp Hm.right),
suffices H2 : (↑m+1)≤ (↑i:ℝ),
exact neg_le_neg H2,
rw [←int.cast_one,←int.cast_add],
suffices H5 : (((m+1):ℤ):ℝ)≤((i:ℤ):ℝ),
exact H5,
rw [int.cast_le],
rw [←Hi],
exact calc m+1 ≤ max (n+1) (m+1) : le_max_right (n+1) (m+1)
... ≤ iz : le_max_right 1 _,
suffices H1 : (n:ℝ)+1 ≤ i, -- of_rat ((n:ℤ):ℚ) + of_rat ((1:ℤ):ℚ) ≤ of_rat ((i:ℤ):ℚ),
exact lt_of_lt_of_le Hn.right H1,
rw [←int.cast_one,←int.cast_add],
suffices H8 : (((n+1):ℤ):ℝ)≤ ((i:ℤ):ℝ), -- of_rat_add,of_rat_le_of_rat,←rat.coe_int_add,rat.coe_int_le],
exact H8,
rw [int.cast_le,←Hi],
exact calc n+1 ≤ max (n+1) (m+1) : le_max_left (n+1) (m+1)
... ≤ iz : le_max_right 1 _,
end
def countable_intersection_from_one {α : Type} (X : nat → set α ) := { t : α | ∀ i, i>0 → t ∈ X i}
-- part d has same sets as part c
-- set_option pp.notation false
theorem Q1d : countable_intersection_from_one Q1c_sets = {x | -1<x ∧ x<1} :=
begin
unfold countable_intersection_from_one,
unfold Q1c_sets,
apply funext,
intro x,
unfold set_of,
apply propext,
unfold has_mem.mem set.mem,
-- all that unfolding leaves us with
/-
x : ℝ
⊢ (∀ (i : ℕ), i > 0 → -↑i < x ∧ x < ↑i) ↔ -1 < x ∧ x < 1
-/
split;intro H,
simpa using ((H 1) (zero_lt_one)),
intro i,
intro Hi,
have i_le_one, exact nat.succ_le_of_lt Hi,
split,
exact calc -(i:ℝ) ≤ -↑1 : neg_le_neg (nat.cast_le.2 i_le_one)
... = -1 : by simp
... <x : H.left,
exact calc x < 1 : H.right
... = ↑(1:ℕ) : by simp
... ≤ ↑i : nat.cast_le.2 i_le_one
end
-- question 2
def open_zero_one := { x : ℝ | 0<x ∧ x<1}
theorem Q2 : forall x : ℝ, x ∈ open_zero_one → ∃ y : ℝ, y ∈ open_zero_one ∧ x<y :=
begin
intro x,
intro H,
have H1 : (0:ℝ) < (2:ℝ),
exact lt_add_of_le_of_pos zero_le_one zero_lt_one,
existsi (x+1)/2,
split,
split,
have H2 : 0<x,
exact H.left,
have H3 : 0 < (x+1),
exact lt_add_of_lt_of_nonneg' H2 zero_le_one,
exact lt_div_of_mul_lt H1 (by simp [H3]),
suffices H2 : (x+1) < 2,
-- tell nmario that without simp theres a timeout
exact div_lt_of_mul_lt_of_pos H1 (by simp [H2]),
exact add_lt_add_right H.right 1,
have H2 : x*(1+1) < (x+1),
rw [mul_add,mul_one,add_lt_add_iff_left],
exact H.right,
have H3 : x*2<(x+1),
exact H2,
exact lt_div_of_mul_lt H1 H3,
-- simp [div_lt_div_of_lt_of_pos H2 H1],
end
-- set_option pp.notation false
infix ` ** `: 80 := monoid.pow
theorem Q3a (n : int) : (3:ℤ) ∣ n ** 2 → (3:ℤ) ∣ n :=
begin
intro Hn2,
-- let r := n % 3,
-- let q := int.div n 3,
-- have H : n = 3*q+r,
have H : n % 3 < 3,
exact @int.mod_lt_of_pos n 3 (by exact dec_trivial),
have H2 : n%3 ≥ 0,
exact int.mod_nonneg n (by exact dec_trivial),
have H3 : exists r:ℕ, (n%3) = int.of_nat r,
exact (int.eq_coe_of_zero_le H2),
cases H3 with r Hr,
have H3 : r<3,
rw [←int.coe_nat_lt_coe_nat_iff,←int.of_nat_eq_coe,←Hr],
exact H,
cases r with r0,
exact (int.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero 3 n).mpr Hr,
cases r0 with r1,
clear H H2 H3,
exfalso,
have H : (n+2)%3=0,
rw [←int.mod_add_mod,Hr],
have H : int.of_nat 1 + 2 = 3,
exact dec_trivial,
rw [H],
exact int.mod_self,
have H2 : 3 ∣ ((n-2)*(n+2)),
-- rw [←int.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero],
rw [←int.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero] at H,
exact dvd_trans H (dvd_mul_left _ _),
simp at H2,
rw [mul_add,add_mul,add_mul,add_assoc,←add_assoc (2*n) _ _,mul_comm 2 n,←mul_add,add_neg_self,mul_zero,zero_add] at H2,
unfold monoid.pow at Hn2,
have H3 : 3 ∣ n * (n * 1) - (n * n + 2 * -2),
exact dvd_sub Hn2 H2,
simp at H3,
have H4 : ¬ ((3:ℤ) ∣ 2*2),
exact dec_trivial,
exact H4 H3,
cases r1 with r2,
clear H H2 H3,
exfalso,
have H : (n+1)%3=0,
rw [←int.mod_add_mod,Hr],
have H : int.of_nat 2 + 1 = 3,
exact dec_trivial,
rw [H],
exact int.mod_self,
have H2 : 3 ∣ ((n-1)*(n+1)),
-- rw [←int.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero],
rw [←int.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero] at H,
exact dvd_trans H (dvd_mul_left _ _),
simp at H2,
rw [mul_add,add_mul,add_mul,add_assoc,←add_assoc (1*n) _ _,mul_comm 1 n,←mul_add,add_neg_self,mul_zero,zero_add] at H2,
unfold monoid.pow at Hn2,
have H3 : 3 ∣ n * (n * 1) - (n * n + 1 * -1),
exact dvd_sub Hn2 H2,
simp at H3,
have H4 : ¬ ((3:ℤ) ∣ 1),
exact dec_trivial,
exact H4 H3,
exfalso,
have H4 : r2+4 ≤ 3,
exact nat.succ_le_of_lt H3,
repeat {rw [nat.succ_le_succ_iff] at H4},
have H5 : nat.succ r2 > 0,
exact nat.zero_lt_succ r2,
have H6 : 0 < 0,
exact calc 0 < r2+1 : H5 ... ≤ 0 : H4,
have H7 : 0 ≠ 0, exact ne_of_gt H6,
have H8 : 0 = 0, refl,
exact H7 H8
-- unfold int.nat_mod at r,
-- unfold int.div at q,
end
-- square root of 3
def exists_sqrt_3 := square_root.exists_unique_square_root 3 (by norm_num)
-- #check exists_sqrt_3
-- exists_sqrt_3 : ∃ (q : ℝ), q ≥ 0 ∧ q ^ 2 = 3 ∧ ∀ (s : ℝ), s ≥ 0 ∧ s ^ 2 = 3 → s = q
noncomputable def sqrt3 := classical.some (exists_sqrt_3)
def sqrt3_proof := classical.some_spec (exists_sqrt_3)
-- #check sqrt3_proof
example : sqrt3 ** 2 = 3 := sqrt3_proof.right.left
noncomputable example : monoid ℝ := by apply_instance
-- set_option pp.all true
theorem no_rational_squared_is_three : ¬ (∃ (q:ℚ),q**2=3) :=
begin
intro H0,cases H0 with q Hq2,
rw [pow_two_eq_mul_self] at Hq2,
let n:=q.num,
let d0:=q.denom,
have Hq_is_n_div_d : q=n/d0,
rw [rat.num_denom q,rat.mk_eq_div],
refl,
have Hd0_not_zero : ¬ (d0=0),
intro Hd0,
have Hq0 : q=0,
rwa [Hd0,nat.cast_zero,div_zero] at Hq_is_n_div_d,
rw [Hq0,mul_zero] at Hq2,
revert Hq2,
norm_num,
let d:ℤ:=↑d0,
rw [rat.num_denom q] at Hq2,
rw [rat.mk_eq_div] at Hq2,
change q.denom with d0 at Hq2,
change (d0:ℤ) with d at Hq2,
have Hd_not_zero : ¬ (d=↑(0:ℕ)),
intro H0, apply Hd0_not_zero,
change d with ↑d0 at H0,
exact int.of_nat.inj H0,
-- tidy up
change q.num with n at Hq2,
clear Hq_is_n_div_d Hd0_not_zero,
rw [div_mul_div] at Hq2,
have H0 : (d:ℚ) * (d:ℚ) ≠ 0,
intro H1,
apply Hd_not_zero,
rw [←int.cast_zero,←int.cast_mul,int.cast_inj] at H1,
cases eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero H1,
assumption,
assumption,
have H1 : (3:ℚ) * (↑d * ↑d) = ↑n * ↑n,
exact (eq_div_iff_mul_eq _ _ H0).mp (eq.symm Hq2),
have H2 : ((3:ℤ):ℚ) * (↑d * ↑d) = ↑n * ↑n,
exact H1,
rw [←int.cast_mul,←int.cast_mul,←int.cast_mul,int.cast_inj] at H2,
-- tidy up; now in Z.
clear Hq2 H0 H1,
-- coprimality of n and d0 built into rat
have H0 : nat.coprime (int.nat_abs n) d0,
exact q.cop,
have H3 : n*n=n**2,
exact mul_self_eq_pow_two,
rw [H3] at H2,
have H1 : (3:ℤ) ∣ n**2,
exact ⟨d*d,eq.symm H2⟩,
have H4 : (3:ℤ) ∣ n,
exact Q3a n H1,
cases H4 with n1 H5,
rw [←H3,H5] at H2,clear H3,
rw [mul_assoc] at H2,
have H6 : d * d = n1 * (3 * n1),
exact eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left (by norm_num) H2,clear H2,
rw [mul_comm n1,mul_assoc] at H6,
rw [mul_self_eq_pow_two] at H6,
have H2 : (3:ℤ) ∣ d**2,
exact ⟨n1 * n1, H6⟩,
clear H1 H6,
have H1 : (3:ℤ) ∣ d,
exact Q3a d H2,
clear H2,
cases H1 with d1 H2,
-- now know H5 : n=3*something,
-- H2 : d = 3 * something,
-- H0 : n coprime to d (modulo coercions)
-- Seems like I now have to coerce everything down to nat
let n0 := int.nat_abs n,
clear Hd_not_zero,
change int.nat_abs n with n0 at H0,
let n2 := int.nat_abs n1,
have H1 : n0 = 3 * n2,
change (3:ℕ) with int.nat_abs (3:ℤ),
rw [←int.nat_abs_mul,←H5],
clear H5,
let d2 := int.nat_abs d1,
have H3 : d0 = 3 * d2,
rw [←int.nat_abs_of_nat d0],
change 3 with int.nat_abs (3:ℤ),
change d2 with int.nat_abs d1,
rw [←int.nat_abs_mul,←H2],
rw [H1,H3] at H0,
clear H3 H2 d d0 H1 n0 n q,
have H1 : nat.coprime (3 * n2) 3,
exact nat.coprime.coprime_mul_right_right H0,
clear H0,
rw [mul_comm] at H1,
have H2 :nat.coprime 3 3,
exact nat.coprime.coprime_mul_left H1,
clear H1 n2 d2 n1 d1,
have H0 : nat.gcd 3 3 = 1,
exact H2,clear H2,
have H1 : 3 ∣ nat.gcd 3 3,
exact nat.dvd_gcd ⟨1,mul_one 3⟩ ⟨1,mul_one 3⟩,
rw H0 at H1,
clear H0,
have H0 : 3 = 1,
exact nat.eq_one_of_dvd_one H1,
clear H1,
revert H0,
norm_num,
end
theorem Q3b : M1F.is_irrational (sqrt3) :=
begin
unfold M1F.is_irrational,
intro H,
cases H with q Hq,
have Hq2 : q*q = (3:ℚ),
rw [←@rat.cast_inj ℝ _ _ (q*q) (3:ℚ),rat.cast_mul,Hq,mul_self_eq_pow_two],
unfold sqrt3,
rw [sqrt3_proof.right.left],
norm_num,
clear Hq,
rw [mul_self_eq_pow_two] at Hq2,
apply no_rational_squared_is_three,
existsi q,
exact Hq2,
end
-- #print no_rational_squared_is_three -- interesting with pp.all true
#print Q3b
theorem Q4a : ¬ (∀ (x y : ℝ), M1F.is_irrational x → M1F.is_irrational y → M1F.is_irrational (x+y)) :=
begin
intro H,
let H2 := H sqrt3 (-sqrt3) Q3b,
have H3 : M1F.is_irrational (-sqrt3),
unfold M1F.is_irrational,
intro H4,
cases H4 with q Hq,
apply Q3b,
exact ⟨-q,
begin
rw [rat.cast_neg],
exact eq.symm (eq_neg_iff_eq_neg.mpr (Hq)),
end
⟩,
apply H2 H3,
exact ⟨0,
begin
rw [add_neg_self,rat.cast_zero],
end
⟩,
end
theorem Q4b : ¬ (∀ (a : ℝ), ∀ (b : ℚ), M1F.is_irrational a → M1F.is_irrational (a*b)) :=
begin
intro H,
let H2 := H sqrt3 0 Q3b,
apply H2,
exact ⟨0,by rw [rat.cast_zero,mul_zero]⟩,
end
theorem Q5a : ∀ (x : ℝ), ∃ (y:ℝ), x+y=2 :=
begin
intro x,
exact ⟨-x+2,by rw [←add_assoc,add_neg_self,zero_add]⟩,
end
theorem Q5b : ¬ (∃ (y:ℝ), ∀ (x:ℝ), x+y=2) :=
begin
intro H,
cases H with y Hy,
let H := Hy (-y),
rw [neg_add_self] at H,
revert H,
norm_num,
end
theorem Q6 : square_root.sqrt_abs 2 + square_root.sqrt_abs 6 < square_root.sqrt_abs 15 :=
begin
let s2 := square_root.sqrt_abs 2,
change square_root.sqrt_abs 2 with s2, --
let s6 := square_root.sqrt_abs 6,
change square_root.sqrt_abs 6 with s6, --
let s15 := square_root.sqrt_abs 15,
change square_root.sqrt_abs 15 with s15, -- I just want names for these variables.
have Hs15 : s15**2 = 15,
exact square_root.sqrt_abs_squared 15 (by norm_num),
rw [pow_two_eq_mul_self] at Hs15,
have Hs2 : s2**2 = 2,
exact square_root.sqrt_abs_squared 2 (by norm_num),
rw [pow_two_eq_mul_self] at Hs2,
have Hs6 : s6**2 = 6,
exact square_root.sqrt_abs_squared 6 (by norm_num), -- I know I'll need these things at some point.
rw [pow_two_eq_mul_self] at Hs6,
apply imp_of_not_or (le_or_gt s15 (s2 + s6)),
intro H1,
-- now square both sides of H1
have H2 : s15 ≥ 0,
exact square_root.sqrt_abs_ge_zero 15,
have H3 : s15*s15 ≤ (s2+s6)*(s2+s6) := mul_self_le_mul_self H2 H1,
rw [Hs15,add_mul_self_eq,Hs2,Hs6] at H3,
rw [←sub_le_iff_le_add,add_comm,←sub_le_iff_le_add] at H3,
revert H3,
norm_num,
intro H3,
have H4 : 7*7 ≤ (s2*(s6*2))*(s2*(s6*2)) := mul_self_le_mul_self (by norm_num) H3,
have H5 : (49:ℝ) ≤ 48 := calc
49 = 7 * 7 : by norm_num
... ≤ s2 * (s6 * 2) * (s2 * (s6 * 2)) : H4
... = (s2*s2)*(s6*s6)*(2*2) : by simp
... = (2:ℝ)*6*(2*2) : by rw [Hs2,Hs6]
... = 48 : by norm_num,
revert H5,
norm_num,
end
/- Q7 : are the following numbers rational or irrational
(a) sqrt(2)+sqrt(3/2)
(b) 1+sqrt(2)+sqrt(3/2)
(c) 2sqrt(18)-3sqrt(8)
-/
theorem Q7a : M1F.is_irrational (square_root.sqrt_abs 2 + square_root.sqrt_abs (3/2)) :=
begin
let s2 := square_root.sqrt_abs 2,
change square_root.sqrt_abs 2 with s2,
have Hs2 : s2**2 = 2,
exact square_root.sqrt_abs_squared 2 (by norm_num),
rw [pow_two_eq_mul_self] at Hs2,
let s3o2 := square_root.sqrt_abs (3/2),
change square_root.sqrt_abs (3/2) with s3o2,
have Hs3o2 : s3o2**2 = 3/2,
exact square_root.sqrt_abs_squared (3/2) (by norm_num),
rw [pow_two_eq_mul_self] at Hs3o2,
intro H,cases H with q Hq,
have H1 : (q:ℝ)*q = 2 + 2*s2*s3o2 + (3/2) := calc
(q:ℝ)*q = (s2 + s3o2)*(s2+s3o2) : by rw [Hq]
... = _ : by rw [add_mul_self_eq]
... = 2 + 2*s2*s3o2 + (3/2) : by rw [Hs2,Hs3o2],
rw [←sub_eq_iff_eq_add,add_comm,←sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at H1,
let r:ℚ := q*q-3/2-2,
have H2 : (r:ℝ)=↑q * ↑q - 3 / 2 - 2,
norm_num,
rw [←H2] at H1,
let s:ℚ := r/2,
have H2not0 : (2:ℝ) ≠ 0 := by norm_num,
have Htemp : (2*(s2*s3o2))/2 = s2*s3o2 := mul_div_cancel_left (s2*s3o2) H2not0,
rw ←mul_assoc at Htemp,
have H3 : (s:ℝ)*s=3 := calc
(s:ℝ)*s=(r/2)*(r/2) : by simp
... = ((2*s2*s3o2)/2)*((2*s2*s3o2)/2) : by rw [H1]
... = (s2*s3o2)*(s2*s3o2) : by rw [Htemp] -- simp [H2not0,mul_assoc,mul_div_cancel_left] -- rw [mul_assoc,mul_div_cancel_left,mul_assoc,mul_div_cancel_left];exact H2not0
... = (s2*s2)*(s3o2*s3o2) : by simp
... = 2*(3/2) : by rw [Hs2,Hs3o2]
... = 3 : by norm_num,
let t:ℚ := abs s,
have H4 : (t:ℝ)*t=3,
change t with abs s,
rwa [←rat.cast_mul,abs_mul_abs_self,rat.cast_mul],
have H4 : (t:ℝ) = sqrt3,
apply sqrt3_proof.right.right t,
split,
change t with abs s,
rw [rat.cast_abs],
exact abs_nonneg (s:ℝ),
rwa [pow_two_eq_mul_self],
have Htemp2 :M1F.is_irrational (t:ℝ),
rw [H4],
exact Q3b,
apply Htemp2,
existsi t,
refl,
end
theorem Q7b : M1F.is_irrational (1+square_root.sqrt_abs 2+square_root.sqrt_abs (3/2)) :=
begin
intro H,
apply Q7a,
cases H with q Hq,
existsi (q-1),
rw [rat.cast_sub,Hq],
simp,
end
theorem Q7c : exists q:ℚ, (q:ℝ) = 2*square_root.sqrt_abs 18 - 3 * square_root.sqrt_abs 8 :=
begin
existsi (0:ℚ),
rw [rat.cast_zero],apply eq.symm,
rw [sub_eq_zero_iff_eq,mul_comm],
-- apply eq.symm,
apply mul_eq_of_eq_div,
norm_num,
apply eq.symm,
apply square_root.sqrt_abs_unique,
{ norm_num},
split,
apply div_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_pos _ _,
apply mul_nonneg _ _,
norm_num,
apply square_root.sqrt_abs_ge_zero _,
norm_num,
-- rw [div_eq_mul_inv],
exact calc
3 * square_root.sqrt_abs 8 / 2 * (3 * square_root.sqrt_abs 8 / 2)
= (square_root.sqrt_abs 8) * (square_root.sqrt_abs 8) * 3 * 3 / 2 / 2 : by simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
... = 8*3*3/2/2 : by rw [square_root.sqrt_abs_mul_self 8 (by norm_num)]
... = 18 : by norm_num,
end
#print Q3b
-/
end M1F_Sheet02 |
1b6159ff6a3a8e1a4cc5f71f4999694e1ebaa1d2 | 624f6f2ae8b3b1adc5f8f67a365c51d5126be45a | /tests/lean/bytearray.lean | 99b2cd680ad3d8d9ba25f9ef578346da69ee7884 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | mhuisi/lean4 | 28d35a4febc2e251c7f05492e13f3b05d6f9b7af | dda44bc47f3e5d024508060dac2bcb59fd12e4c0 | refs/heads/master | 1,621,225,489,283 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 250,590,438 | 0 | 2 | Apache-2.0 | 1,602,443,220,000 | 1,585,327,814,000 | C | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 231 | lean | def tst : IO Unit :=
do
let bs := [1, 2, 3].toByteArray;
IO.println bs;
let bs := bs.push 4;
let bs := bs.set! 1 20;
IO.println bs;
let bs₁ := bs.set! 2 30;
IO.println bs₁;
IO.println bs;
IO.println bs.size;
pure ()
#eval tst
|
96159a4c1bfeb9916a0a700ca38e5afb6d920509 | 3446e92e64a5de7ed1f2109cfb024f83cd904c34 | /src/game/world1/level3.lean | fd9c5a42bcd56197be546f55a550ac1f36fda034 | [] | no_license | kckennylau/natural_number_game | 019f4a5f419c9681e65234ecd124c564f9a0a246 | ad8c0adaa725975be8a9f978c8494a39311029be | refs/heads/master | 1,598,784,137,722 | 1,571,905,156,000 | 1,571,905,156,000 | 218,354,686 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,572,373,319,000 | 1,572,373,318,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,863 | lean | import mynat.definition -- hide
namespace mynat -- hide
/-
# World 1 : Tutorial world
## level 3: The rewrite (`rw`) tactic.
The rewrite tactic is the way to "substitute in" the value
of a variable. In general, If you have a hypothesis of the form `A = B`, and your
goal mentions the left hand side `A` somewhere, then
the `rewrite` tactic will replace the `A` in your goal with a `B`.
Below is a theorem which looks obvious, but which cannot be
proved using `refl` and `exact` alone -- you need a rewrite.
Delete the sorry and take a look in the top right box at what we have.
The variables `x`, `y` and `z`
are natural numbers, and we have functions `f` and `g` from natural numbers
to natural numbers. We have a proof `h` of `y = f(x)` and our goal
is to prove that `g(y) = g(f(x))`. This goal is obvious -- we just
substitute in `y = f(x)` into the goal and we're done. In Lean, we do
this substitution using the `rw` tactic. So start your proof with
`rw h,`
and then hit enter. **don't forget the comma.**
Did you see what happened to the goal? The goal doesn't close,
but it *changes* from `⊢ g y = g (f x)` to `⊢ g (f x) = g (f x)`
(note that computer scientists are a bit less liberal with brackets
than mathematicians!). We can just close this goal with
`refl,`
written on the line after `rw h,`. Don't forget the comma, hit
enter, and enjoy seeing the "Proof complete!" message in the
top right window. The other reason you'll know you're
done is that the bottom right window (the error window)
becomes empty.
-/
/- Lemma : no-side-bar
For all natural numbers $x$, $y$ and $z$ and all functions $f$
and $g$ from the naturals to themselves, if $y = f(x)$
and then $g(y) = g(f(x))$.
-/
lemma example3 (x y z : mynat) (f g : mynat → mynat)
(h : y = f(x)) : g(y) = g(f(x)) :=
begin [less_leaky]
rw h,
refl
end
/- Tactic : rw
The `rw` tactic is a way to do "substituting in".
If `h : A = B` is a hypothesis (i.e., a proof of `A = B`)
and your goal contains one or more `A`s, then `rw h`
will change them all to `B`'s. If you want to change
`B`s to `A`s instead, try `rw ←h` (get the arrow with `\l`).
### Example:
If it looks like this in the top right hand box:
```
x y : mynat
h : x = y + 3
⊢ 1 + x = y + 4
```
then
`rw h,`
will change the goal into `⊢ 1 + (y + 3) = y + 4`.
Note of course that this goal is still far from solved.
-/
/-
## Exploring your proof.
1) Click on `refl,` and then use the arrow keys to move
your cursor around the proof. Go up and down and note that
the goal changes -- indeed you can inspect Lean's "state" at each
line of the proof (the hypotheses, and the goal).
Try to figure out the exact place where the goal changes.
The comma tells Lean "I've finished writing this tactic now,
please process it." Lean ignores newlines, but pays great
attention to commas.
-/
end mynat -- hide |
8a8ea119d63833f38bf3b09462798a96efe77c38 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/algebra/algebra/basic_auto.lean | a0c8a2245c8e3f1db16cf7bc33c52bb9263c93fe | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 75,001 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.tactic.nth_rewrite.default
import Mathlib.data.matrix.basic
import Mathlib.data.equiv.ring_aut
import Mathlib.linear_algebra.tensor_product
import Mathlib.ring_theory.subring
import Mathlib.deprecated.subring
import Mathlib.algebra.opposites
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes u v l u_1 u_2 w u₁ v₁ u_3 u_4
namespace Mathlib
/-!
# Algebra over Commutative Semiring
In this file we define `algebra`s over commutative (semi)rings, algebra homomorphisms `alg_hom`,
algebra equivalences `alg_equiv`. We also define usual operations on `alg_hom`s
(`id`, `comp`).
`subalgebra`s are defined in `algebra.algebra.subalgebra`.
If `S` is an `R`-algebra and `A` is an `S`-algebra then `algebra.comap.algebra R S A` can be used
to provide `A` with a structure of an `R`-algebra. Other than that, `algebra.comap` is now
deprecated and replaced with `is_scalar_tower`.
For the category of `R`-algebras, denoted `Algebra R`, see the file
`algebra/category/Algebra/basic.lean`.
## Notations
* `A →ₐ[R] B` : `R`-algebra homomorphism from `A` to `B`.
* `A ≃ₐ[R] B` : `R`-algebra equivalence from `A` to `B`.
-/
-- We set this priority to 0 later in this file
/--
Given a commutative (semi)ring `R`, an `R`-algebra is a (possibly noncommutative)
(semi)ring `A` endowed with a morphism of rings `R →+* A` which lands in the
center of `A`.
For convenience, this typeclass extends `has_scalar R A` where the scalar action must
agree with left multiplication by the image of the structure morphism.
Given an `algebra R A` instance, the structure morphism `R →+* A` is denoted `algebra_map R A`.
-/
class algebra (R : Type u) (A : Type v) [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
extends has_scalar R A, R →+* A where
commutes' :
∀ (r : R) (x : A), ring_hom.to_fun _to_ring_hom r * x = x * ring_hom.to_fun _to_ring_hom r
smul_def' : ∀ (r : R) (x : A), r • x = ring_hom.to_fun _to_ring_hom r * x
/-- Embedding `R →+* A` given by `algebra` structure. -/
def algebra_map (R : Type u) (A : Type v) [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A] : R →+* A :=
algebra.to_ring_hom
/-- Creating an algebra from a morphism to the center of a semiring. -/
def ring_hom.to_algebra' {R : Type u_1} {S : Type u_2} [comm_semiring R] [semiring S] (i : R →+* S)
(h : ∀ (c : R) (x : S), coe_fn i c * x = x * coe_fn i c) : algebra R S :=
algebra.mk i h sorry
/-- Creating an algebra from a morphism to a commutative semiring. -/
def ring_hom.to_algebra {R : Type u_1} {S : Type u_2} [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring S]
(i : R →+* S) : algebra R S :=
ring_hom.to_algebra' i sorry
theorem ring_hom.algebra_map_to_algebra {R : Type u_1} {S : Type u_2} [comm_semiring R]
[comm_semiring S] (i : R →+* S) : algebra_map R S = i :=
rfl
namespace algebra
/-- Let `R` be a commutative semiring, let `A` be a semiring with a `semimodule R` structure.
If `(r • 1) * x = x * (r • 1) = r • x` for all `r : R` and `x : A`, then `A` is an `algebra`
over `R`. -/
def of_semimodule' {R : Type u} {A : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [semimodule R A]
(h₁ : ∀ (r : R) (x : A), r • 1 * x = r • x) (h₂ : ∀ (r : R) (x : A), x * r • 1 = r • x) :
algebra R A :=
mk (ring_hom.mk (fun (r : R) => r • 1) sorry sorry sorry sorry) sorry sorry
/-- Let `R` be a commutative semiring, let `A` be a semiring with a `semimodule R` structure.
If `(r • x) * y = x * (r • y) = r • (x * y)` for all `r : R` and `x y : A`, then `A`
is an `algebra` over `R`. -/
def of_semimodule {R : Type u} {A : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [semimodule R A]
(h₁ : ∀ (r : R) (x y : A), r • x * y = r • (x * y))
(h₂ : ∀ (r : R) (x y : A), x * r • y = r • (x * y)) : algebra R A :=
of_semimodule' sorry sorry
theorem smul_def'' {R : Type u} {A : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A] (r : R)
(x : A) : r • x = coe_fn (algebra_map R A) r * x :=
smul_def' r x
/--
To prove two algebra structures on a fixed `[comm_semiring R] [semiring A]` agree,
it suffices to check the `algebra_map`s agree.
-/
-- We'll later use this to show `algebra ℤ M` is a subsingleton.
theorem algebra_ext {R : Type u_1} [comm_semiring R] {A : Type u_2} [semiring A] (P : algebra R A)
(Q : algebra R A) (w : ∀ (r : R), coe_fn (algebra_map R A) r = coe_fn (algebra_map R A) r) :
P = Q :=
sorry
protected instance to_semimodule {R : Type u} {A : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[algebra R A] : semimodule R A :=
semimodule.mk sorry sorry
-- from now on, we don't want to use the following instance anymore
theorem smul_def {R : Type u} {A : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A] (r : R)
(x : A) : r • x = coe_fn (algebra_map R A) r * x :=
smul_def' r x
theorem algebra_map_eq_smul_one {R : Type u} {A : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[algebra R A] (r : R) : coe_fn (algebra_map R A) r = r • 1 :=
Eq.trans (Eq.symm (mul_one (coe_fn (algebra_map R A) r))) (Eq.symm (smul_def r 1))
theorem commutes {R : Type u} {A : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A] (r : R)
(x : A) : coe_fn (algebra_map R A) r * x = x * coe_fn (algebra_map R A) r :=
commutes' r x
theorem left_comm {R : Type u} {A : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A] (r : R)
(x : A) (y : A) : x * (coe_fn (algebra_map R A) r * y) = coe_fn (algebra_map R A) r * (x * y) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem mul_smul_comm {R : Type u} {A : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A]
(s : R) (x : A) (y : A) : x * s • y = s • (x * y) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem smul_mul_assoc {R : Type u} {A : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[algebra R A] (r : R) (x : A) (y : A) : r • x * y = r • (x * y) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem bit0_smul_one {R : Type u} {A : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A]
{r : R} : bit0 r • 1 = r • bit0 1 :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem bit0_smul_bit0 {R : Type u} {A : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[algebra R A] {r : R} {a : A} : bit0 r • bit0 a = r • bit0 (bit0 a) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem bit0_smul_bit1 {R : Type u} {A : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[algebra R A] {r : R} {a : A} : bit0 r • bit1 a = r • bit0 (bit1 a) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem bit1_smul_one {R : Type u} {A : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A]
{r : R} : bit1 r • 1 = r • bit0 1 + 1 :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem bit1_smul_bit0 {R : Type u} {A : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[algebra R A] {r : R} {a : A} : bit1 r • bit0 a = r • bit0 (bit0 a) + bit0 a :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem bit1_smul_bit1 {R : Type u} {A : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[algebra R A] {r : R} {a : A} : bit1 r • bit1 a = r • bit0 (bit1 a) + bit1 a :=
sorry
/--
The canonical ring homomorphism `algebra_map R A : R →* A` for any `R`-algebra `A`,
packaged as an `R`-linear map.
-/
protected def linear_map (R : Type u) (A : Type w) [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A] :
linear_map R R A :=
linear_map.mk (ring_hom.to_fun (algebra_map R A)) sorry sorry
@[simp] theorem linear_map_apply (R : Type u) (A : Type w) [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[algebra R A] (r : R) : coe_fn (algebra.linear_map R A) r = coe_fn (algebra_map R A) r :=
rfl
protected instance id (R : Type u) [comm_semiring R] : algebra R R :=
ring_hom.to_algebra (ring_hom.id R)
namespace id
@[simp] theorem map_eq_self {R : Type u} [comm_semiring R] (x : R) :
coe_fn (algebra_map R R) x = x :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem smul_eq_mul {R : Type u} [comm_semiring R] (x : R) (y : R) : x • y = x * y := rfl
end id
protected instance prod.algebra (R : Type u) (A : Type w) (B : Type u_1) [comm_semiring R]
[semiring A] [algebra R A] [semiring B] [algebra R B] : algebra R (A × B) :=
mk
(ring_hom.mk (ring_hom.to_fun (ring_hom.prod (algebra_map R A) (algebra_map R B))) sorry sorry
sorry sorry)
sorry sorry
@[simp] theorem algebra_map_prod_apply {R : Type u} {A : Type w} {B : Type u_1} [comm_semiring R]
[semiring A] [algebra R A] [semiring B] [algebra R B] (r : R) :
coe_fn (algebra_map R (A × B)) r = (coe_fn (algebra_map R A) r, coe_fn (algebra_map R B) r) :=
rfl
/-- Algebra over a subsemiring. -/
protected instance of_subsemiring {R : Type u} {A : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[algebra R A] (S : subsemiring R) : algebra (↥S) A :=
mk
(ring_hom.mk (ring_hom.to_fun (ring_hom.comp (algebra_map R A) (subsemiring.subtype S))) sorry
sorry sorry sorry)
sorry sorry
/-- Algebra over a subring. -/
protected instance of_subring {R : Type u_1} {A : Type u_2} [comm_ring R] [ring A] [algebra R A]
(S : subring R) : algebra (↥S) A :=
mk
(ring_hom.mk (ring_hom.to_fun (ring_hom.comp (algebra_map R A) (subring.subtype S))) sorry sorry
sorry sorry)
sorry sorry
theorem algebra_map_of_subring {R : Type u_1} [comm_ring R] (S : subring R) :
algebra_map (↥S) R = subring.subtype S :=
rfl
theorem coe_algebra_map_of_subring {R : Type u_1} [comm_ring R] (S : subring R) :
⇑(algebra_map (↥S) R) = subtype.val :=
rfl
theorem algebra_map_of_subring_apply {R : Type u_1} [comm_ring R] (S : subring R) (x : ↥S) :
coe_fn (algebra_map (↥S) R) x = ↑x :=
rfl
/-- Algebra over a set that is closed under the ring operations. -/
def of_is_subring {R : Type u_1} {A : Type u_2} [comm_ring R] [ring A] [algebra R A] (S : set R)
[is_subring S] : algebra (↥S) A :=
algebra.of_subring (set.to_subring S)
theorem is_subring_coe_algebra_map_hom {R : Type u_1} [comm_ring R] (S : set R) [is_subring S] :
algebra_map (↥S) R = is_subring.subtype S :=
rfl
theorem is_subring_coe_algebra_map {R : Type u_1} [comm_ring R] (S : set R) [is_subring S] :
⇑(algebra_map (↥S) R) = subtype.val :=
rfl
theorem is_subring_algebra_map_apply {R : Type u_1} [comm_ring R] (S : set R) [is_subring S]
(x : ↥S) : coe_fn (algebra_map (↥S) R) x = ↑x :=
rfl
theorem set_range_subset {R : Type u_1} [comm_ring R] {T₁ : set R} {T₂ : set R} [is_subring T₁]
(hyp : T₁ ⊆ T₂) : set.range ⇑(algebra_map (↥T₁) R) ⊆ T₂ :=
sorry
/-- Explicit characterization of the submonoid map in the case of an algebra.
`S` is made explicit to help with type inference -/
def algebra_map_submonoid {R : Type u} [comm_semiring R] (S : Type u_1) [semiring S] [algebra R S]
(M : submonoid R) : submonoid S :=
submonoid.map (↑(algebra_map R S)) M
theorem mem_algebra_map_submonoid_of_mem {R : Type u} {S : Type v} [comm_semiring R]
[comm_semiring S] [algebra R S] {M : submonoid R} (x : ↥M) :
coe_fn (algebra_map R S) ↑x ∈ algebra_map_submonoid S M :=
set.mem_image_of_mem (⇑(algebra_map R S)) (subtype.property x)
/-- A `semiring` that is an `algebra` over a commutative ring carries a natural `ring` structure. -/
def semiring_to_ring (R : Type u) {A : Type w} [comm_ring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A] : ring A :=
ring.mk add_comm_group.add sorry add_comm_group.zero sorry sorry add_comm_group.neg
add_comm_group.sub sorry sorry semiring.mul sorry semiring.one sorry sorry sorry sorry
theorem mul_sub_algebra_map_commutes {R : Type u} {A : Type w} [comm_ring R] [ring A] [algebra R A]
(x : A) (r : R) : x * (x - coe_fn (algebra_map R A) r) = (x - coe_fn (algebra_map R A) r) * x :=
sorry
theorem mul_sub_algebra_map_pow_commutes {R : Type u} {A : Type w} [comm_ring R] [ring A]
[algebra R A] (x : A) (r : R) (n : ℕ) :
x * (x - coe_fn (algebra_map R A) r) ^ n = (x - coe_fn (algebra_map R A) r) ^ n * x :=
sorry
end algebra
namespace opposite
protected instance algebra {R : Type u_1} {A : Type u_2} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[algebra R A] : algebra R (Aᵒᵖ) :=
algebra.mk (ring_hom.to_opposite (algebra_map R A) sorry) sorry sorry
@[simp] theorem algebra_map_apply {R : Type u_1} {A : Type u_2} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[algebra R A] (c : R) : coe_fn (algebra_map R (Aᵒᵖ)) c = op (coe_fn (algebra_map R A) c) :=
rfl
end opposite
namespace module
protected instance endomorphism_algebra (R : Type u) (M : Type v) [comm_semiring R]
[add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule R M] : algebra R (linear_map R M M) :=
algebra.mk (ring_hom.mk (fun (r : R) => r • linear_map.id) sorry sorry sorry sorry) sorry sorry
theorem algebra_map_End_eq_smul_id (R : Type u) (M : Type v) [comm_semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M]
[semimodule R M] (a : R) : coe_fn (algebra_map R (End R M)) a = a • linear_map.id :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem algebra_map_End_apply (R : Type u) (M : Type v) [comm_semiring R]
[add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule R M] (a : R) (m : M) :
coe_fn (coe_fn (algebra_map R (End R M)) a) m = a • m :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem ker_algebra_map_End (K : Type u) (V : Type v) [field K] [add_comm_group V]
[vector_space K V] (a : K) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
linear_map.ker (coe_fn (algebra_map K (End K V)) a) = ⊥ :=
linear_map.ker_smul linear_map.id a ha
end module
protected instance matrix_algebra (n : Type u) (R : Type v) [DecidableEq n] [fintype n]
[comm_semiring R] : algebra R (matrix n n R) :=
algebra.mk (ring_hom.mk (ring_hom.to_fun (matrix.scalar n)) sorry sorry sorry sorry) sorry sorry
/-- Defining the homomorphism in the category R-Alg. -/
structure alg_hom (R : Type u) (A : Type v) (B : Type w) [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [semiring B]
[algebra R A] [algebra R B]
extends A →+* B where
commutes' : ∀ (r : R), to_fun (coe_fn (algebra_map R A) r) = coe_fn (algebra_map R B) r
namespace alg_hom
protected instance has_coe_to_fun {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R]
[semiring A] [semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] : has_coe_to_fun (alg_hom R A B) :=
has_coe_to_fun.mk (fun (f : alg_hom R A B) => A → B) fun (f : alg_hom R A B) => to_fun f
protected instance coe_ring_hom {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R]
[semiring A] [semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] : has_coe (alg_hom R A B) (A →+* B) :=
has_coe.mk to_ring_hom
protected instance coe_monoid_hom {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R]
[semiring A] [semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] : has_coe (alg_hom R A B) (A →* B) :=
has_coe.mk fun (f : alg_hom R A B) => ↑↑f
protected instance coe_add_monoid_hom {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R]
[semiring A] [semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] : has_coe (alg_hom R A B) (A →+ B) :=
has_coe.mk fun (f : alg_hom R A B) => ↑↑f
@[simp] theorem coe_mk {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] {f : A → B} (h₁ : f 1 = 1)
(h₂ : ∀ (x y : A), f (x * y) = f x * f y) (h₃ : f 0 = 0)
(h₄ : ∀ (x y : A), f (x + y) = f x + f y)
(h₅ : ∀ (r : R), f (coe_fn (algebra_map R A) r) = coe_fn (algebra_map R B) r) :
⇑(mk f h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅) = f :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_to_ring_hom {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R]
[semiring A] [semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] (f : alg_hom R A B) : ⇑↑f = ⇑f :=
rfl
-- as `simp` can already prove this lemma, it is not tagged with the `simp` attribute.
theorem coe_to_monoid_hom {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] (f : alg_hom R A B) : ⇑↑f = ⇑f :=
rfl
-- as `simp` can already prove this lemma, it is not tagged with the `simp` attribute.
theorem coe_to_add_monoid_hom {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] (f : alg_hom R A B) : ⇑↑f = ⇑f :=
rfl
theorem coe_fn_inj {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] {φ₁ : alg_hom R A B} {φ₂ : alg_hom R A B}
(H : ⇑φ₁ = ⇑φ₂) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
sorry
theorem coe_ring_hom_injective {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] : function.injective coe :=
fun (φ₁ φ₂ : alg_hom R A B) (H : ↑φ₁ = ↑φ₂) =>
coe_fn_inj ((fun (this : ⇑↑φ₁ = ⇑↑φ₂) => this) (congr_arg coe_fn H))
theorem coe_monoid_hom_injective {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R]
[semiring A] [semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] : function.injective coe :=
function.injective.comp ring_hom.coe_monoid_hom_injective coe_ring_hom_injective
theorem coe_add_monoid_hom_injective {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R]
[semiring A] [semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] : function.injective coe :=
function.injective.comp ring_hom.coe_add_monoid_hom_injective coe_ring_hom_injective
protected theorem congr_fun {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] {φ₁ : alg_hom R A B} {φ₂ : alg_hom R A B} (H : φ₁ = φ₂)
(x : A) : coe_fn φ₁ x = coe_fn φ₂ x :=
H ▸ rfl
protected theorem congr_arg {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] (φ : alg_hom R A B) {x : A} {y : A} (h : x = y) :
coe_fn φ x = coe_fn φ y :=
h ▸ rfl
theorem ext {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [semiring B]
[algebra R A] [algebra R B] {φ₁ : alg_hom R A B} {φ₂ : alg_hom R A B}
(H : ∀ (x : A), coe_fn φ₁ x = coe_fn φ₂ x) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
coe_fn_inj (funext H)
theorem ext_iff {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [semiring B]
[algebra R A] [algebra R B] {φ₁ : alg_hom R A B} {φ₂ : alg_hom R A B} :
φ₁ = φ₂ ↔ ∀ (x : A), coe_fn φ₁ x = coe_fn φ₂ x :=
{ mp := alg_hom.congr_fun, mpr := ext }
@[simp] theorem mk_coe {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] {f : alg_hom R A B} (h₁ : coe_fn f 1 = 1)
(h₂ : ∀ (x y : A), coe_fn f (x * y) = coe_fn f x * coe_fn f y) (h₃ : coe_fn f 0 = 0)
(h₄ : ∀ (x y : A), coe_fn f (x + y) = coe_fn f x + coe_fn f y)
(h₅ : ∀ (r : R), coe_fn f (coe_fn (algebra_map R A) r) = coe_fn (algebra_map R B) r) :
mk (⇑f) h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅ = f :=
ext fun (_x : A) => rfl
@[simp] theorem commutes {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] (φ : alg_hom R A B) (r : R) :
coe_fn φ (coe_fn (algebra_map R A) r) = coe_fn (algebra_map R B) r :=
commutes' φ r
theorem comp_algebra_map {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] (φ : alg_hom R A B) :
ring_hom.comp (↑φ) (algebra_map R A) = algebra_map R B :=
ring_hom.ext (commutes φ)
@[simp] theorem map_add {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] (φ : alg_hom R A B) (r : A) (s : A) :
coe_fn φ (r + s) = coe_fn φ r + coe_fn φ s :=
ring_hom.map_add (to_ring_hom φ) r s
@[simp] theorem map_zero {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] (φ : alg_hom R A B) : coe_fn φ 0 = 0 :=
ring_hom.map_zero (to_ring_hom φ)
@[simp] theorem map_mul {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] (φ : alg_hom R A B) (x : A) (y : A) :
coe_fn φ (x * y) = coe_fn φ x * coe_fn φ y :=
ring_hom.map_mul (to_ring_hom φ) x y
@[simp] theorem map_one {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] (φ : alg_hom R A B) : coe_fn φ 1 = 1 :=
ring_hom.map_one (to_ring_hom φ)
@[simp] theorem map_smul {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] (φ : alg_hom R A B) (r : R) (x : A) :
coe_fn φ (r • x) = r • coe_fn φ x :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem map_pow {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] (φ : alg_hom R A B) (x : A) (n : ℕ) :
coe_fn φ (x ^ n) = coe_fn φ x ^ n :=
ring_hom.map_pow (to_ring_hom φ) x n
theorem map_sum {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [semiring B]
[algebra R A] [algebra R B] (φ : alg_hom R A B) {ι : Type u_1} (f : ι → A) (s : finset ι) :
coe_fn φ (finset.sum s fun (x : ι) => f x) = finset.sum s fun (x : ι) => coe_fn φ (f x) :=
ring_hom.map_sum (to_ring_hom φ) f s
theorem map_finsupp_sum {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] (φ : alg_hom R A B) {α : Type u_1} [HasZero α]
{ι : Type u_2} (f : ι →₀ α) (g : ι → α → A) :
coe_fn φ (finsupp.sum f g) = finsupp.sum f fun (i : ι) (a : α) => coe_fn φ (g i a) :=
map_sum φ (fun (a : ι) => g a (coe_fn f a)) (finsupp.support f)
@[simp] theorem map_nat_cast {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] (φ : alg_hom R A B) (n : ℕ) : coe_fn φ ↑n = ↑n :=
ring_hom.map_nat_cast (to_ring_hom φ) n
@[simp] theorem map_bit0 {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] (φ : alg_hom R A B) (x : A) :
coe_fn φ (bit0 x) = bit0 (coe_fn φ x) :=
ring_hom.map_bit0 (to_ring_hom φ) x
@[simp] theorem map_bit1 {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] (φ : alg_hom R A B) (x : A) :
coe_fn φ (bit1 x) = bit1 (coe_fn φ x) :=
ring_hom.map_bit1 (to_ring_hom φ) x
/-- If a `ring_hom` is `R`-linear, then it is an `alg_hom`. -/
def mk' {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [semiring B]
[algebra R A] [algebra R B] (f : A →+* B)
(h : ∀ (c : R) (x : A), coe_fn f (c • x) = c • coe_fn f x) : alg_hom R A B :=
mk (⇑f) (ring_hom.map_one' f) (ring_hom.map_mul' f) (ring_hom.map_zero' f) (ring_hom.map_add' f)
sorry
@[simp] theorem coe_mk' {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] (f : A →+* B)
(h : ∀ (c : R) (x : A), coe_fn f (c • x) = c • coe_fn f x) : ⇑(mk' f h) = ⇑f :=
rfl
/-- Identity map as an `alg_hom`. -/
protected def id (R : Type u) (A : Type v) [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A] :
alg_hom R A A :=
mk (ring_hom.to_fun (ring_hom.id A)) sorry sorry sorry sorry sorry
@[simp] theorem id_apply {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A]
(p : A) : coe_fn (alg_hom.id R A) p = p :=
rfl
/-- Composition of algebra homeomorphisms. -/
def comp {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} {C : Type u₁} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[semiring B] [semiring C] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] [algebra R C] (φ₁ : alg_hom R B C)
(φ₂ : alg_hom R A B) : alg_hom R A C :=
mk (ring_hom.to_fun (ring_hom.comp (to_ring_hom φ₁) ↑φ₂)) sorry sorry sorry sorry sorry
@[simp] theorem comp_apply {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} {C : Type u₁} [comm_semiring R]
[semiring A] [semiring B] [semiring C] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] [algebra R C]
(φ₁ : alg_hom R B C) (φ₂ : alg_hom R A B) (p : A) :
coe_fn (comp φ₁ φ₂) p = coe_fn φ₁ (coe_fn φ₂ p) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem comp_id {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] (φ : alg_hom R A B) : comp φ (alg_hom.id R A) = φ :=
ext fun (x : A) => rfl
@[simp] theorem id_comp {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] (φ : alg_hom R A B) : comp (alg_hom.id R B) φ = φ :=
ext fun (x : A) => rfl
theorem comp_assoc {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} {C : Type u₁} {D : Type v₁}
[comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [semiring B] [semiring C] [semiring D] [algebra R A]
[algebra R B] [algebra R C] [algebra R D] (φ₁ : alg_hom R C D) (φ₂ : alg_hom R B C)
(φ₃ : alg_hom R A B) : comp (comp φ₁ φ₂) φ₃ = comp φ₁ (comp φ₂ φ₃) :=
ext fun (x : A) => rfl
/-- R-Alg ⥤ R-Mod -/
def to_linear_map {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [semiring B]
[algebra R A] [algebra R B] (φ : alg_hom R A B) : linear_map R A B :=
linear_map.mk (⇑φ) (map_add φ) (map_smul φ)
@[simp] theorem to_linear_map_apply {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R]
[semiring A] [semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] (φ : alg_hom R A B) (p : A) :
coe_fn (to_linear_map φ) p = coe_fn φ p :=
rfl
theorem to_linear_map_inj {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] {φ₁ : alg_hom R A B} {φ₂ : alg_hom R A B}
(H : to_linear_map φ₁ = to_linear_map φ₂) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem comp_to_linear_map {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} {C : Type u₁}
[comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [semiring B] [semiring C] [algebra R A] [algebra R B]
[algebra R C] (f : alg_hom R A B) (g : alg_hom R B C) :
to_linear_map (comp g f) = linear_map.comp (to_linear_map g) (to_linear_map f) :=
rfl
theorem map_prod {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring A]
[comm_semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] (φ : alg_hom R A B) {ι : Type u_1} (f : ι → A)
(s : finset ι) :
coe_fn φ (finset.prod s fun (x : ι) => f x) = finset.prod s fun (x : ι) => coe_fn φ (f x) :=
ring_hom.map_prod (to_ring_hom φ) f s
theorem map_finsupp_prod {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring A]
[comm_semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] (φ : alg_hom R A B) {α : Type u_1} [HasZero α]
{ι : Type u_2} (f : ι →₀ α) (g : ι → α → A) :
coe_fn φ (finsupp.prod f g) = finsupp.prod f fun (i : ι) (a : α) => coe_fn φ (g i a) :=
map_prod φ (fun (a : ι) => g a (coe_fn f a)) (finsupp.support f)
@[simp] theorem map_neg {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [ring A] [ring B]
[algebra R A] [algebra R B] (φ : alg_hom R A B) (x : A) : coe_fn φ (-x) = -coe_fn φ x :=
ring_hom.map_neg (to_ring_hom φ) x
@[simp] theorem map_sub {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [ring A] [ring B]
[algebra R A] [algebra R B] (φ : alg_hom R A B) (x : A) (y : A) :
coe_fn φ (x - y) = coe_fn φ x - coe_fn φ y :=
ring_hom.map_sub (to_ring_hom φ) x y
@[simp] theorem map_int_cast {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [ring A]
[ring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] (φ : alg_hom R A B) (n : ℤ) : coe_fn φ ↑n = ↑n :=
ring_hom.map_int_cast (to_ring_hom φ) n
@[simp] theorem map_inv {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_ring R] [division_ring A]
[division_ring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] (φ : alg_hom R A B) (x : A) :
coe_fn φ (x⁻¹) = (coe_fn φ x⁻¹) :=
ring_hom.map_inv (to_ring_hom φ) x
@[simp] theorem map_div {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [comm_ring R] [division_ring A]
[division_ring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] (φ : alg_hom R A B) (x : A) (y : A) :
coe_fn φ (x / y) = coe_fn φ x / coe_fn φ y :=
ring_hom.map_div (to_ring_hom φ) x y
theorem injective_iff {R : Type u_1} {A : Type u_2} {B : Type u_3} [comm_semiring R] [ring A]
[semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] (f : alg_hom R A B) :
function.injective ⇑f ↔ ∀ (x : A), coe_fn f x = 0 → x = 0 :=
ring_hom.injective_iff ↑f
end alg_hom
/-- An equivalence of algebras is an equivalence of rings commuting with the actions of scalars. -/
structure alg_equiv (R : Type u) (A : Type v) (B : Type w) [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B]
extends A ≃+ B, A ≃+* B, A ≃ B, A ≃* B where
commutes' : ∀ (r : R), to_fun (coe_fn (algebra_map R A) r) = coe_fn (algebra_map R B) r
namespace alg_equiv
protected instance has_coe_to_fun {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R]
[semiring A₁] [semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] :
has_coe_to_fun (alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) :=
has_coe_to_fun.mk (fun (x : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) => A₁ → A₂) to_fun
theorem ext {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁] [semiring A₂]
[algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] {f : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂} {g : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂}
(h : ∀ (a : A₁), coe_fn f a = coe_fn g a) : f = g :=
sorry
protected theorem congr_arg {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁]
[semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] {f : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂} {x : A₁} {x' : A₁} :
x = x' → coe_fn f x = coe_fn f x' :=
sorry
protected theorem congr_fun {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁]
[semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] {f : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂} {g : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂}
(h : f = g) (x : A₁) : coe_fn f x = coe_fn g x :=
h ▸ rfl
theorem ext_iff {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁]
[semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] {f : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂} {g : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂} :
f = g ↔ ∀ (x : A₁), coe_fn f x = coe_fn g x :=
{ mp := fun (h : f = g) (x : A₁) => h ▸ rfl, mpr := ext }
theorem coe_fun_injective {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁]
[semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] :
function.injective fun (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) => ⇑e :=
id
fun (f g : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂)
(w : (fun (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) => ⇑e) f = (fun (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) => ⇑e) g) =>
ext fun (a : A₁) => congr_fun w a
protected instance has_coe_to_ring_equiv {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R]
[semiring A₁] [semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] :
has_coe (alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) (A₁ ≃+* A₂) :=
has_coe.mk to_ring_equiv
@[simp] theorem mk_apply {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁]
[semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] {to_fun : A₁ → A₂} {inv_fun : A₂ → A₁}
{left_inv : function.left_inverse inv_fun to_fun}
{right_inv : function.right_inverse inv_fun to_fun}
{map_mul : ∀ (x y : A₁), to_fun (x * y) = to_fun x * to_fun y}
{map_add : ∀ (x y : A₁), to_fun (x + y) = to_fun x + to_fun y}
{commutes : ∀ (r : R), to_fun (coe_fn (algebra_map R A₁) r) = coe_fn (algebra_map R A₂) r}
{a : A₁} :
coe_fn (mk to_fun inv_fun left_inv right_inv map_mul map_add commutes) a = to_fun a :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem to_fun_apply {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R]
[semiring A₁] [semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] {e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂} {a : A₁} :
to_fun e a = coe_fn e a :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_ring_equiv {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R]
[semiring A₁] [semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) : ⇑↑e = ⇑e :=
rfl
theorem coe_ring_equiv_injective {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R]
[semiring A₁] [semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] :
function.injective fun (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) => ↑e :=
id
fun (f g : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂)
(w : (fun (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) => ↑e) f = (fun (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) => ↑e) g) =>
ext fun (a : A₁) => congr_fun (congr_arg (fun (e : A₁ ≃+* A₂) => ⇑e) w) a
@[simp] theorem map_add {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁]
[semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) (x : A₁) (y : A₁) :
coe_fn e (x + y) = coe_fn e x + coe_fn e y :=
add_equiv.map_add (to_add_equiv e)
@[simp] theorem map_zero {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁]
[semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) : coe_fn e 0 = 0 :=
add_equiv.map_zero (to_add_equiv e)
@[simp] theorem map_mul {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁]
[semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) (x : A₁) (y : A₁) :
coe_fn e (x * y) = coe_fn e x * coe_fn e y :=
mul_equiv.map_mul (to_mul_equiv e)
@[simp] theorem map_one {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁]
[semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) : coe_fn e 1 = 1 :=
mul_equiv.map_one (to_mul_equiv e)
@[simp] theorem commutes {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁]
[semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) (r : R) :
coe_fn e (coe_fn (algebra_map R A₁) r) = coe_fn (algebra_map R A₂) r :=
commutes' e
theorem map_sum {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁]
[semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) {ι : Type u_1} (f : ι → A₁)
(s : finset ι) :
coe_fn e (finset.sum s fun (x : ι) => f x) = finset.sum s fun (x : ι) => coe_fn e (f x) :=
add_equiv.map_sum (to_add_equiv e) f s
theorem map_finsupp_sum {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁]
[semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) {α : Type u_1} [HasZero α]
{ι : Type u_2} (f : ι →₀ α) (g : ι → α → A₁) :
coe_fn e (finsupp.sum f g) = finsupp.sum f fun (i : ι) (b : α) => coe_fn e (g i b) :=
map_sum e (fun (a : ι) => g a (coe_fn f a)) (finsupp.support f)
/-- Interpret an algebra equivalence as an algebra homomorphism.
This definition is included for symmetry with the other `to_*_hom` projections.
The `simp` normal form is to use the coercion of the `has_coe_to_alg_hom` instance. -/
def to_alg_hom {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁]
[semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) : alg_hom R A₁ A₂ :=
alg_hom.mk (to_fun e) (map_one e) (map_mul' e) (map_zero e) (map_add' e) (commutes' e)
protected instance has_coe_to_alg_hom {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R]
[semiring A₁] [semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] :
has_coe (alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) (alg_hom R A₁ A₂) :=
has_coe.mk to_alg_hom
@[simp] theorem to_alg_hom_eq_coe {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R]
[semiring A₁] [semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) :
to_alg_hom e = ↑e :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_alg_hom {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁]
[semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) : ⇑↑e = ⇑e :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem map_pow {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁]
[semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) (x : A₁) (n : ℕ) :
coe_fn e (x ^ n) = coe_fn e x ^ n :=
alg_hom.map_pow (to_alg_hom e)
theorem injective {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁]
[semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) : function.injective ⇑e :=
equiv.injective (to_equiv e)
theorem surjective {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁]
[semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) : function.surjective ⇑e :=
equiv.surjective (to_equiv e)
theorem bijective {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁]
[semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) : function.bijective ⇑e :=
equiv.bijective (to_equiv e)
protected instance has_one {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁]
[algebra R A₁] : HasOne (alg_equiv R A₁ A₁) :=
{ one := mk (ring_equiv.to_fun 1) (ring_equiv.inv_fun 1) sorry sorry sorry sorry sorry }
protected instance inhabited {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁]
[algebra R A₁] : Inhabited (alg_equiv R A₁ A₁) :=
{ default := 1 }
/-- Algebra equivalences are reflexive. -/
def refl {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁] [algebra R A₁] :
alg_equiv R A₁ A₁ :=
1
@[simp] theorem coe_refl {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁] [algebra R A₁] :
↑refl = alg_hom.id R A₁ :=
alg_hom.ext fun (x : A₁) => rfl
/-- Algebra equivalences are symmetric. -/
def symm {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁] [semiring A₂]
[algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) : alg_equiv R A₂ A₁ :=
mk (ring_equiv.to_fun (ring_equiv.symm (to_ring_equiv e)))
(ring_equiv.inv_fun (ring_equiv.symm (to_ring_equiv e))) sorry sorry sorry sorry sorry
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def simps.inv_fun {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁]
[semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) : A₂ → A₁ :=
⇑(symm e)
@[simp] theorem inv_fun_eq_symm {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R]
[semiring A₁] [semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] {e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂} :
inv_fun e = ⇑(symm e) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem symm_symm {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁]
[semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] {e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂} : symm (symm e) = e :=
ext fun (a : A₁) => Eq.refl (coe_fn (symm (symm e)) a)
/-- Algebra equivalences are transitive. -/
def trans {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} {A₃ : Type u₁} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁]
[semiring A₂] [semiring A₃] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] [algebra R A₃]
(e₁ : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) (e₂ : alg_equiv R A₂ A₃) : alg_equiv R A₁ A₃ :=
mk (ring_equiv.to_fun (ring_equiv.trans (to_ring_equiv e₁) (to_ring_equiv e₂)))
(ring_equiv.inv_fun (ring_equiv.trans (to_ring_equiv e₁) (to_ring_equiv e₂))) sorry sorry sorry
sorry sorry
@[simp] theorem apply_symm_apply {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R]
[semiring A₁] [semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) (x : A₂) :
coe_fn e (coe_fn (symm e) x) = x :=
equiv.apply_symm_apply (to_equiv e)
@[simp] theorem symm_apply_apply {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R]
[semiring A₁] [semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) (x : A₁) :
coe_fn (symm e) (coe_fn e x) = x :=
equiv.symm_apply_apply (to_equiv e)
@[simp] theorem trans_apply {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} {A₃ : Type u₁}
[comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁] [semiring A₂] [semiring A₃] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂]
[algebra R A₃] (e₁ : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) (e₂ : alg_equiv R A₂ A₃) (x : A₁) :
coe_fn (trans e₁ e₂) x = coe_fn e₂ (coe_fn e₁ x) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem comp_symm {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁]
[semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) :
alg_hom.comp ↑e ↑(symm e) = alg_hom.id R A₂ :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem symm_comp {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁]
[semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) :
alg_hom.comp ↑(symm e) ↑e = alg_hom.id R A₁ :=
sorry
/-- If `A₁` is equivalent to `A₁'` and `A₂` is equivalent to `A₂'`, then the type of maps
`A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂` is equivalent to the type of maps `A₁' →ₐ[R] A₂'`. -/
def arrow_congr {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁]
[semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] {A₁' : Type u_1} {A₂' : Type u_2} [semiring A₁']
[semiring A₂'] [algebra R A₁'] [algebra R A₂'] (e₁ : alg_equiv R A₁ A₁')
(e₂ : alg_equiv R A₂ A₂') : alg_hom R A₁ A₂ ≃ alg_hom R A₁' A₂' :=
equiv.mk
(fun (f : alg_hom R A₁ A₂) =>
alg_hom.comp (alg_hom.comp (to_alg_hom e₂) f) (to_alg_hom (symm e₁)))
(fun (f : alg_hom R A₁' A₂') =>
alg_hom.comp (alg_hom.comp (to_alg_hom (symm e₂)) f) (to_alg_hom e₁))
sorry sorry
theorem arrow_congr_comp {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} {A₃ : Type u₁} [comm_semiring R]
[semiring A₁] [semiring A₂] [semiring A₃] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] [algebra R A₃]
{A₁' : Type u_1} {A₂' : Type u_2} {A₃' : Type u_3} [semiring A₁'] [semiring A₂'] [semiring A₃']
[algebra R A₁'] [algebra R A₂'] [algebra R A₃'] (e₁ : alg_equiv R A₁ A₁')
(e₂ : alg_equiv R A₂ A₂') (e₃ : alg_equiv R A₃ A₃') (f : alg_hom R A₁ A₂)
(g : alg_hom R A₂ A₃) :
coe_fn (arrow_congr e₁ e₃) (alg_hom.comp g f) =
alg_hom.comp (coe_fn (arrow_congr e₂ e₃) g) (coe_fn (arrow_congr e₁ e₂) f) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem arrow_congr_refl {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R]
[semiring A₁] [semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] :
arrow_congr refl refl = equiv.refl (alg_hom R A₁ A₂) :=
equiv.ext
fun (x : alg_hom R A₁ A₂) =>
alg_hom.ext fun (x_1 : A₁) => Eq.refl (coe_fn (coe_fn (arrow_congr refl refl) x) x_1)
@[simp] theorem arrow_congr_trans {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} {A₃ : Type u₁}
[comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁] [semiring A₂] [semiring A₃] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂]
[algebra R A₃] {A₁' : Type u_1} {A₂' : Type u_2} {A₃' : Type u_3} [semiring A₁'] [semiring A₂']
[semiring A₃'] [algebra R A₁'] [algebra R A₂'] [algebra R A₃'] (e₁ : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂)
(e₁' : alg_equiv R A₁' A₂') (e₂ : alg_equiv R A₂ A₃) (e₂' : alg_equiv R A₂' A₃') :
arrow_congr (trans e₁ e₂) (trans e₁' e₂') =
equiv.trans (arrow_congr e₁ e₁') (arrow_congr e₂ e₂') :=
equiv.ext
fun (x : alg_hom R A₁ A₁') =>
alg_hom.ext
fun (x_1 : A₃) =>
Eq.refl (coe_fn (coe_fn (arrow_congr (trans e₁ e₂) (trans e₁' e₂')) x) x_1)
@[simp] theorem arrow_congr_symm {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R]
[semiring A₁] [semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] {A₁' : Type u_1} {A₂' : Type u_2}
[semiring A₁'] [semiring A₂'] [algebra R A₁'] [algebra R A₂'] (e₁ : alg_equiv R A₁ A₁')
(e₂ : alg_equiv R A₂ A₂') : equiv.symm (arrow_congr e₁ e₂) = arrow_congr (symm e₁) (symm e₂) :=
equiv.ext
fun (x : alg_hom R A₁' A₂') =>
alg_hom.ext fun (x_1 : A₁) => Eq.refl (coe_fn (coe_fn (equiv.symm (arrow_congr e₁ e₂)) x) x_1)
/-- If an algebra morphism has an inverse, it is a algebra isomorphism. -/
def of_alg_hom {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁]
[semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (f : alg_hom R A₁ A₂) (g : alg_hom R A₂ A₁)
(h₁ : alg_hom.comp f g = alg_hom.id R A₂) (h₂ : alg_hom.comp g f = alg_hom.id R A₁) :
alg_equiv R A₁ A₂ :=
mk (alg_hom.to_fun f) ⇑g sorry sorry (alg_hom.map_mul' f) (alg_hom.map_add' f)
(alg_hom.commutes' f)
/-- Promotes a bijective algebra homomorphism to an algebra equivalence. -/
def of_bijective {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁]
[semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (f : alg_hom R A₁ A₂) (hf : function.bijective ⇑f) :
alg_equiv R A₁ A₂ :=
mk (ring_equiv.to_fun (ring_equiv.of_bijective (↑f) hf))
(ring_equiv.inv_fun (ring_equiv.of_bijective (↑f) hf)) sorry sorry sorry sorry
(alg_hom.commutes' f)
/-- Forgetting the multiplicative structures, an equivalence of algebras is a linear equivalence. -/
def to_linear_equiv {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁]
[semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) : linear_equiv R A₁ A₂ :=
linear_equiv.mk (to_fun e) sorry sorry (to_fun (symm e)) (left_inv e) (right_inv e)
@[simp] theorem to_linear_equiv_apply {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R]
[semiring A₁] [semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) (x : A₁) :
coe_fn (to_linear_equiv e) x = coe_fn e x :=
rfl
theorem to_linear_equiv_inj {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁]
[semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] {e₁ : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂} {e₂ : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂}
(H : to_linear_equiv e₁ = to_linear_equiv e₂) : e₁ = e₂ :=
sorry
/-- Interpret an algebra equivalence as a linear map. -/
def to_linear_map {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁]
[semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) : linear_map R A₁ A₂ :=
alg_hom.to_linear_map (to_alg_hom e)
@[simp] theorem to_alg_hom_to_linear_map {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R]
[semiring A₁] [semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) :
alg_hom.to_linear_map ↑e = to_linear_map e :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem to_linear_equiv_to_linear_map {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w}
[comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁] [semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂]
(e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) : linear_equiv.to_linear_map (to_linear_equiv e) = to_linear_map e :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem to_linear_map_apply {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R]
[semiring A₁] [semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) (x : A₁) :
coe_fn (to_linear_map e) x = coe_fn e x :=
rfl
theorem to_linear_map_inj {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁]
[semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] {e₁ : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂} {e₂ : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂}
(H : to_linear_map e₁ = to_linear_map e₂) : e₁ = e₂ :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem trans_to_linear_map {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} {A₃ : Type u₁}
[comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁] [semiring A₂] [semiring A₃] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂]
[algebra R A₃] (f : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) (g : alg_equiv R A₂ A₃) :
to_linear_map (trans f g) = linear_map.comp (to_linear_map g) (to_linear_map f) :=
rfl
protected instance aut {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁] [algebra R A₁] :
group (alg_equiv R A₁ A₁) :=
group.mk (fun (ϕ ψ : alg_equiv R A₁ A₁) => trans ψ ϕ) sorry 1 sorry sorry symm
(div_inv_monoid.div._default (fun (ϕ ψ : alg_equiv R A₁ A₁) => trans ψ ϕ) sorry 1 sorry sorry
symm)
sorry
theorem map_prod {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring A₁]
[comm_semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) {ι : Type u_1}
(f : ι → A₁) (s : finset ι) :
coe_fn e (finset.prod s fun (x : ι) => f x) = finset.prod s fun (x : ι) => coe_fn e (f x) :=
alg_hom.map_prod (to_alg_hom e) f s
theorem map_finsupp_prod {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_semiring R]
[comm_semiring A₁] [comm_semiring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂)
{α : Type u_1} [HasZero α] {ι : Type u_2} (f : ι →₀ α) (g : ι → α → A₁) :
coe_fn e (finsupp.prod f g) = finsupp.prod f fun (i : ι) (a : α) => coe_fn e (g i a) :=
alg_hom.map_finsupp_prod (to_alg_hom e) f g
@[simp] theorem map_neg {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_ring R] [ring A₁] [ring A₂]
[algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) (x : A₁) : coe_fn e (-x) = -coe_fn e x :=
alg_hom.map_neg (to_alg_hom e) x
@[simp] theorem map_sub {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_ring R] [ring A₁] [ring A₂]
[algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) (x : A₁) (y : A₁) :
coe_fn e (x - y) = coe_fn e x - coe_fn e y :=
alg_hom.map_sub (to_alg_hom e) x y
@[simp] theorem map_inv {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_ring R] [division_ring A₁]
[division_ring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) (x : A₁) :
coe_fn e (x⁻¹) = (coe_fn e x⁻¹) :=
alg_hom.map_inv (to_alg_hom e) x
@[simp] theorem map_div {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} [comm_ring R] [division_ring A₁]
[division_ring A₂] [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (e : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) (x : A₁) (y : A₁) :
coe_fn e (x / y) = coe_fn e x / coe_fn e y :=
alg_hom.map_div (to_alg_hom e) x y
end alg_equiv
namespace matrix
/-! ### `matrix` section
Specialize `matrix.one_map` and `matrix.zero_map` to `alg_hom` and `alg_equiv`.
TODO: there should be a way to avoid restating these for each `foo_hom`.
-/
/-- A version of `matrix.one_map` where `f` is an `alg_hom`. -/
@[simp] theorem alg_hom_map_one {R : Type u_1} {A₁ : Type u_2} {A₂ : Type u_3} {n : Type u_4}
[fintype n] [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁] [algebra R A₁] [semiring A₂] [algebra R A₂]
[DecidableEq n] (f : alg_hom R A₁ A₂) : map 1 ⇑f = 1 :=
one_map (alg_hom.map_zero f) (alg_hom.map_one f)
/-- A version of `matrix.one_map` where `f` is an `alg_equiv`. -/
@[simp] theorem alg_equiv_map_one {R : Type u_1} {A₁ : Type u_2} {A₂ : Type u_3} {n : Type u_4}
[fintype n] [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁] [algebra R A₁] [semiring A₂] [algebra R A₂]
[DecidableEq n] (f : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) : map 1 ⇑f = 1 :=
one_map (alg_equiv.map_zero f) (alg_equiv.map_one f)
/-- A version of `matrix.zero_map` where `f` is an `alg_hom`. -/
@[simp] theorem alg_hom_map_zero {R : Type u_1} {A₁ : Type u_2} {A₂ : Type u_3} {n : Type u_4}
[fintype n] [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁] [algebra R A₁] [semiring A₂] [algebra R A₂]
(f : alg_hom R A₁ A₂) : map 0 ⇑f = 0 :=
map_zero (alg_hom.map_zero f)
/-- A version of `matrix.zero_map` where `f` is an `alg_equiv`. -/
@[simp] theorem alg_equiv_map_zero {R : Type u_1} {A₁ : Type u_2} {A₂ : Type u_3} {n : Type u_4}
[fintype n] [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁] [algebra R A₁] [semiring A₂] [algebra R A₂]
(f : alg_equiv R A₁ A₂) : map 0 ⇑f = 0 :=
map_zero (alg_equiv.map_zero f)
end matrix
namespace algebra
/-- `comap R S A` is a type alias for `A`, and has an R-algebra structure defined on it
when `algebra R S` and `algebra S A`. If `S` is an `R`-algebra and `A` is an `S`-algebra then
`algebra.comap.algebra R S A` can be used to provide `A` with a structure of an `R`-algebra.
Other than that, `algebra.comap` is now deprecated and replaced with `is_scalar_tower`. -/
/- This is done to avoid a type class search with meta-variables `algebra R ?m_1` and
`algebra ?m_1 A -/
/- The `nolint` attribute is added because it has unused arguments `R` and `S`, but these are
necessary for synthesizing the appropriate type classes -/
def comap (R : Type u) (S : Type v) (A : Type w) := A
protected instance comap.inhabited (R : Type u) (S : Type v) (A : Type w) [h : Inhabited A] :
Inhabited (comap R S A) :=
h
protected instance comap.semiring (R : Type u) (S : Type v) (A : Type w) [h : semiring A] :
semiring (comap R S A) :=
h
protected instance comap.ring (R : Type u) (S : Type v) (A : Type w) [h : ring A] :
ring (comap R S A) :=
h
protected instance comap.comm_semiring (R : Type u) (S : Type v) (A : Type w)
[h : comm_semiring A] : comm_semiring (comap R S A) :=
h
protected instance comap.comm_ring (R : Type u) (S : Type v) (A : Type w) [h : comm_ring A] :
comm_ring (comap R S A) :=
h
protected instance comap.algebra' (R : Type u) (S : Type v) (A : Type w) [comm_semiring S]
[semiring A] [h : algebra S A] : algebra S (comap R S A) :=
h
/-- Identity homomorphism `A →ₐ[S] comap R S A`. -/
def comap.to_comap (R : Type u) (S : Type v) (A : Type w) [comm_semiring S] [semiring A]
[algebra S A] : alg_hom S A (comap R S A) :=
alg_hom.id S A
/-- Identity homomorphism `comap R S A →ₐ[S] A`. -/
def comap.of_comap (R : Type u) (S : Type v) (A : Type w) [comm_semiring S] [semiring A]
[algebra S A] : alg_hom S (comap R S A) A :=
alg_hom.id S A
/-- `R ⟶ S` induces `S-Alg ⥤ R-Alg` -/
protected instance comap.algebra (R : Type u) (S : Type v) (A : Type w) [comm_semiring R]
[comm_semiring S] [semiring A] [algebra R S] [algebra S A] : algebra R (comap R S A) :=
mk
(ring_hom.mk (ring_hom.to_fun (ring_hom.comp (algebra_map S A) (algebra_map R S))) sorry sorry
sorry sorry)
sorry sorry
/-- Embedding of `S` into `comap R S A`. -/
def to_comap (R : Type u) (S : Type v) (A : Type w) [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring S] [semiring A]
[algebra R S] [algebra S A] : alg_hom R S (comap R S A) :=
alg_hom.mk (ring_hom.to_fun (algebra_map S A)) sorry sorry sorry sorry sorry
theorem to_comap_apply (R : Type u) (S : Type v) (A : Type w) [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring S]
[semiring A] [algebra R S] [algebra S A] (x : S) :
coe_fn (to_comap R S A) x = coe_fn (algebra_map S A) x :=
rfl
end algebra
namespace alg_hom
/-- R ⟶ S induces S-Alg ⥤ R-Alg -/
def comap {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {A : Type w} {B : Type u₁} [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring S]
[semiring A] [semiring B] [algebra R S] [algebra S A] [algebra S B] (φ : alg_hom S A B) :
alg_hom R (algebra.comap R S A) (algebra.comap R S B) :=
mk (to_fun φ) (map_one' φ) (map_mul' φ) (map_zero' φ) (map_add' φ) sorry
end alg_hom
namespace ring_hom
/-- Reinterpret a `ring_hom` as an `ℕ`-algebra homomorphism. -/
def to_nat_alg_hom {R : Type u_1} {S : Type u_2} [semiring R] [semiring S] [algebra ℕ R]
[algebra ℕ S] (f : R →+* S) : alg_hom ℕ R S :=
alg_hom.mk (⇑f) (map_one' f) (map_mul' f) (map_zero' f) (map_add' f) sorry
/-- Reinterpret a `ring_hom` as a `ℤ`-algebra homomorphism. -/
def to_int_alg_hom {R : Type u_1} {S : Type u_2} [ring R] [ring S] [algebra ℤ R] [algebra ℤ S]
(f : R →+* S) : alg_hom ℤ R S :=
alg_hom.mk (to_fun f) sorry sorry sorry sorry sorry
@[simp] theorem map_rat_algebra_map {R : Type u_1} {S : Type u_2} [ring R] [ring S] [algebra ℚ R]
[algebra ℚ S] (f : R →+* S) (r : ℚ) :
coe_fn f (coe_fn (algebra_map ℚ R) r) = coe_fn (algebra_map ℚ S) r :=
iff.mp ext_iff (subsingleton.elim (comp f (algebra_map ℚ R)) (algebra_map ℚ S)) r
/-- Reinterpret a `ring_hom` as a `ℚ`-algebra homomorphism. -/
def to_rat_alg_hom {R : Type u_1} {S : Type u_2} [ring R] [ring S] [algebra ℚ R] [algebra ℚ S]
(f : R →+* S) : alg_hom ℚ R S :=
alg_hom.mk (to_fun f) sorry sorry sorry sorry (map_rat_algebra_map f)
end ring_hom
namespace rat
protected instance algebra_rat {α : Type u_1} [division_ring α] [char_zero α] : algebra ℚ α :=
ring_hom.to_algebra' (cast_hom α) sorry
end rat
namespace algebra
/-- `algebra_map` as an `alg_hom`. -/
def of_id (R : Type u) (A : Type v) [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A] : alg_hom R R A :=
alg_hom.mk (ring_hom.to_fun (algebra_map R A)) sorry sorry sorry sorry sorry
theorem of_id_apply {R : Type u} (A : Type v) [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A] (r : R) :
coe_fn (of_id R A) r = coe_fn (algebra_map R A) r :=
rfl
/-- The multiplication in an algebra is a bilinear map. -/
def lmul (R : Type u) (A : Type v) [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A] :
alg_hom R A (module.End R A) :=
alg_hom.mk
(linear_map.to_fun
((fun (this : linear_map R A (linear_map R A A)) => this)
(linear_map.mk₂ R Mul.mul sorry sorry sorry sorry)))
sorry sorry sorry sorry sorry
/-- The multiplication on the left in an algebra is a linear map. -/
def lmul_left (R : Type u) {A : Type v} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A] (r : A) :
linear_map R A A :=
coe_fn (lmul R A) r
/-- The multiplication on the right in an algebra is a linear map. -/
def lmul_right (R : Type u) {A : Type v} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A] (r : A) :
linear_map R A A :=
coe_fn (linear_map.flip (alg_hom.to_linear_map (lmul R A))) r
/-- Simultaneous multiplication on the left and right is a linear map. -/
def lmul_left_right (R : Type u) {A : Type v} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A]
(vw : A × A) : linear_map R A A :=
linear_map.comp (lmul_right R (prod.snd vw)) (lmul_left R (prod.fst vw))
/-- The multiplication map on an algebra, as an `R`-linear map from `A ⊗[R] A` to `A`. -/
def lmul' (R : Type u) {A : Type v} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A] :
linear_map R (tensor_product R A A) A :=
tensor_product.lift (alg_hom.to_linear_map (lmul R A))
@[simp] theorem lmul_apply {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A]
(p : A) (q : A) : coe_fn (coe_fn (lmul R A) p) q = p * q :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem lmul_left_apply {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[algebra R A] (p : A) (q : A) : coe_fn (lmul_left R p) q = p * q :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem lmul_right_apply {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[algebra R A] (p : A) (q : A) : coe_fn (lmul_right R p) q = q * p :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem lmul_left_right_apply {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[algebra R A] (vw : A × A) (p : A) :
coe_fn (lmul_left_right R vw) p = prod.fst vw * p * prod.snd vw :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem lmul_left_one {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[algebra R A] : lmul_left R 1 = linear_map.id :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem lmul_left_mul {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A]
(a : A) (b : A) : lmul_left R (a * b) = linear_map.comp (lmul_left R a) (lmul_left R b) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem lmul_right_one {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[algebra R A] : lmul_right R 1 = linear_map.id :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem lmul_right_mul {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[algebra R A] (a : A) (b : A) :
lmul_right R (a * b) = linear_map.comp (lmul_right R b) (lmul_right R a) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem lmul'_apply {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A]
{x : A} {y : A} : coe_fn (lmul' R) (tensor_product.tmul R x y) = x * y :=
sorry
protected instance linear_map.semimodule' (R : Type u) [comm_semiring R] (M : Type v)
[add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule R M] (S : Type w) [comm_semiring S] [algebra R S] :
semimodule S (linear_map R M S) :=
semimodule.mk sorry sorry
end algebra
/-- Semiring ⥤ ℕ-Alg -/
protected instance algebra_nat (R : Type u_1) [semiring R] : algebra ℕ R :=
algebra.mk (nat.cast_ring_hom R) nat.cast_commute sorry
theorem span_nat_eq_add_group_closure (R : Type u_1) [semiring R] (s : set R) :
submodule.to_add_submonoid (submodule.span ℕ s) = add_submonoid.closure s :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem span_nat_eq (R : Type u_1) [semiring R] (s : add_submonoid R) :
submodule.to_add_submonoid (submodule.span ℕ ↑s) = s :=
sorry
/-- Ring ⥤ ℤ-Alg -/
protected instance algebra_int (R : Type u_1) [ring R] : algebra ℤ R :=
algebra.mk (int.cast_ring_hom R) int.cast_commute sorry
protected instance int_algebra_subsingleton {S : Type u_2} [ring S] : subsingleton (algebra ℤ S) :=
subsingleton.intro
fun (P Q : algebra ℤ S) =>
algebra.algebra_ext P Q
fun (r : ℤ) =>
eq.mpr
(id
(Eq.trans
((fun (a a_1 : S) (e_1 : a = a_1) (ᾰ ᾰ_1 : S) (e_2 : ᾰ = ᾰ_1) =>
congr (congr_arg Eq e_1) e_2)
(coe_fn (algebra_map ℤ S) r) (↑r) (ring_hom.eq_int_cast (algebra_map ℤ S) r)
(coe_fn (algebra_map ℤ S) r) (↑r) (ring_hom.eq_int_cast (algebra_map ℤ S) r))
(propext (eq_self_iff_true ↑r))))
trivial
protected instance nat_algebra_subsingleton {S : Type u_2} [semiring S] :
subsingleton (algebra ℕ S) :=
subsingleton.intro
fun (P Q : algebra ℕ S) =>
algebra.algebra_ext P Q
fun (r : ℕ) =>
eq.mpr
(id
(Eq.trans
((fun (a a_1 : S) (e_1 : a = a_1) (ᾰ ᾰ_1 : S) (e_2 : ᾰ = ᾰ_1) =>
congr (congr_arg Eq e_1) e_2)
(coe_fn (algebra_map ℕ S) r) (↑r) (ring_hom.eq_nat_cast (algebra_map ℕ S) r)
(coe_fn (algebra_map ℕ S) r) (↑r) (ring_hom.eq_nat_cast (algebra_map ℕ S) r))
(propext (eq_self_iff_true ↑r))))
trivial
theorem span_int_eq_add_group_closure {R : Type u_1} [ring R] (s : set R) :
submodule.to_add_subgroup (submodule.span ℤ s) = add_subgroup.closure s :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem span_int_eq {R : Type u_1} [ring R] (s : add_subgroup R) :
submodule.to_add_subgroup (submodule.span ℤ ↑s) = s :=
eq.mpr
(id
(Eq._oldrec (Eq.refl (submodule.to_add_subgroup (submodule.span ℤ ↑s) = s))
(span_int_eq_add_group_closure ↑s)))
(eq.mpr (id (Eq._oldrec (Eq.refl (add_subgroup.closure ↑s = s)) (add_subgroup.closure_eq s)))
(Eq.refl s))
/-!
The R-algebra structure on `Π i : I, A i` when each `A i` is an R-algebra.
We couldn't set this up back in `algebra.pi_instances` because this file imports it.
-/
namespace pi
protected instance algebra (I : Type u) (f : I → Type v) (α : Type u_1) {r : comm_semiring α}
[s : (i : I) → semiring (f i)] [(i : I) → algebra α (f i)] : algebra α ((i : I) → f i) :=
algebra.mk
(ring_hom.mk (ring_hom.to_fun (pi.ring_hom fun (i : I) => algebra_map α (f i))) sorry sorry
sorry sorry)
sorry sorry
@[simp] theorem algebra_map_apply (I : Type u) (f : I → Type v) (α : Type u_1) {r : comm_semiring α}
[s : (i : I) → semiring (f i)] [(i : I) → algebra α (f i)] (a : α) (i : I) :
coe_fn (algebra_map α ((i : I) → f i)) a i = coe_fn (algebra_map α (f i)) a :=
rfl
-- One could also build a `Π i, R i`-algebra structure on `Π i, A i`,
-- when each `A i` is an `R i`-algebra, although I'm not sure that it's useful.
end pi
theorem algebra_compatible_smul {R : Type u_1} [comm_semiring R] (A : Type u_2) [semiring A]
[algebra R A] {M : Type u_3} [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule A M] [semimodule R M]
[is_scalar_tower R A M] (r : R) (m : M) : r • m = coe_fn (algebra_map R A) r • m :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem algebra_map_smul {R : Type u_1} [comm_semiring R] (A : Type u_2) [semiring A]
[algebra R A] {M : Type u_3} [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule A M] [semimodule R M]
[is_scalar_tower R A M] (r : R) (m : M) : coe_fn (algebra_map R A) r • m = r • m :=
Eq.symm (algebra_compatible_smul A r m)
protected instance is_scalar_tower.to_smul_comm_class {R : Type u_1} [comm_semiring R]
{A : Type u_2} [semiring A] [algebra R A] {M : Type u_3} [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule A M]
[semimodule R M] [is_scalar_tower R A M] : smul_comm_class R A M :=
smul_comm_class.mk
fun (r : R) (a : A) (m : M) =>
eq.mpr
(id (Eq._oldrec (Eq.refl (r • a • m = a • r • m)) (algebra_compatible_smul A r (a • m))))
(eq.mpr
(id
(Eq._oldrec (Eq.refl (coe_fn (algebra_map R A) r • a • m = a • r • m))
(smul_smul (coe_fn (algebra_map R A) r) a m)))
(eq.mpr
(id
(Eq._oldrec (Eq.refl ((coe_fn (algebra_map R A) r * a) • m = a • r • m))
(algebra.commutes r a)))
(eq.mpr
(id
(Eq._oldrec (Eq.refl ((a * coe_fn (algebra_map R A) r) • m = a • r • m))
(mul_smul a (coe_fn (algebra_map R A) r) m)))
(eq.mpr
(id
(Eq._oldrec (Eq.refl (a • coe_fn (algebra_map R A) r • m = a • r • m))
(Eq.symm (algebra_compatible_smul A r m))))
(Eq.refl (a • r • m))))))
protected instance is_scalar_tower.to_smul_comm_class' {R : Type u_1} [comm_semiring R]
{A : Type u_2} [semiring A] [algebra R A] {M : Type u_3} [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule A M]
[semimodule R M] [is_scalar_tower R A M] : smul_comm_class A R M :=
smul_comm_class.symm R A M
theorem smul_algebra_smul_comm {R : Type u_1} [comm_semiring R] {A : Type u_2} [semiring A]
[algebra R A] {M : Type u_3} [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule A M] [semimodule R M]
[is_scalar_tower R A M] (r : R) (a : A) (m : M) : a • r • m = r • a • m :=
smul_comm a r m
namespace linear_map
protected instance coe_is_scalar_tower {R : Type u_1} [comm_semiring R] {A : Type u_2} [semiring A]
[algebra R A] {M : Type u_3} [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule A M] [semimodule R M]
[is_scalar_tower R A M] {N : Type u_4} [add_comm_monoid N] [semimodule A N] [semimodule R N]
[is_scalar_tower R A N] : has_coe (linear_map A M N) (linear_map R M N) :=
has_coe.mk (restrict_scalars R)
@[simp] theorem coe_restrict_scalars_eq_coe (R : Type u_1) [comm_semiring R] {A : Type u_2}
[semiring A] [algebra R A] {M : Type u_3} [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule A M] [semimodule R M]
[is_scalar_tower R A M] {N : Type u_4} [add_comm_monoid N] [semimodule A N] [semimodule R N]
[is_scalar_tower R A N] (f : linear_map A M N) : ⇑(restrict_scalars R f) = ⇑f :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_coe_is_scalar_tower (R : Type u_1) [comm_semiring R] {A : Type u_2} [semiring A]
[algebra R A] {M : Type u_3} [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule A M] [semimodule R M]
[is_scalar_tower R A M] {N : Type u_4} [add_comm_monoid N] [semimodule A N] [semimodule R N]
[is_scalar_tower R A N] (f : linear_map A M N) : ⇑↑f = ⇑f :=
rfl
/-- `A`-linearly coerce a `R`-linear map from `M` to `A` to a function, given an algebra `A` over
a commutative semiring `R` and `M` a semimodule over `R`. -/
def lto_fun (R : Type u) (M : Type v) (A : Type w) [comm_semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M]
[semimodule R M] [comm_ring A] [algebra R A] : linear_map A (linear_map R M A) (M → A) :=
mk to_fun sorry sorry
end linear_map
/- In this section, we describe restriction of scalars: if `S` is an algebra over `R`, then
`S`-modules are also `R`-modules. -/
/--
Warning: use this type synonym judiciously!
The preferred way of working with an `A`-module `M` as `R`-module (where `A` is an `R`-algebra),
is by `[module R M] [module A M] [is_scalar_tower R A M]`.
When `M` is a module over a ring `A`, and `A` is an algebra over `R`, then `M` inherits a
module structure over `R`, provided as a type synonym `module.restrict_scalars R A M := M`.
-/
def restrict_scalars (R : Type u_1) (A : Type u_2) (M : Type u_3) := M
protected instance restrict_scalars.inhabited (R : Type u_1) (A : Type u_2) (M : Type u_3)
[I : Inhabited M] : Inhabited (restrict_scalars R A M) :=
I
protected instance restrict_scalars.add_comm_monoid (R : Type u_1) (A : Type u_2) (M : Type u_3)
[I : add_comm_monoid M] : add_comm_monoid (restrict_scalars R A M) :=
I
protected instance restrict_scalars.add_comm_group (R : Type u_1) (A : Type u_2) (M : Type u_3)
[I : add_comm_group M] : add_comm_group (restrict_scalars R A M) :=
I
protected instance restrict_scalars.module_orig (R : Type u_1) (A : Type u_2) (M : Type u_3)
[semiring A] [add_comm_monoid M] [I : semimodule A M] : semimodule A (restrict_scalars R A M) :=
I
/--
When `M` is a module over a ring `A`, and `A` is an algebra over `R`, then `M` inherits a
module structure over `R`.
The preferred way of setting this up is `[module R M] [module A M] [is_scalar_tower R A M]`.
-/
protected instance restrict_scalars.semimodule (R : Type u_1) (A : Type u_2) (M : Type u_3)
[comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A] [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule A M] :
semimodule R (restrict_scalars R A M) :=
semimodule.mk sorry sorry
theorem restrict_scalars_smul_def (R : Type u_1) (A : Type u_2) (M : Type u_3) [comm_semiring R]
[semiring A] [algebra R A] [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule A M] (c : R)
(x : restrict_scalars R A M) : c • x = coe_fn (algebra_map R A) c • x :=
rfl
protected instance restrict_scalars.is_scalar_tower (R : Type u_1) (A : Type u_2) (M : Type u_3)
[comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A] [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule A M] :
is_scalar_tower R A (restrict_scalars R A M) :=
is_scalar_tower.mk
fun (r : R) (A_1 : A) (M_1 : restrict_scalars R A M) =>
eq.mpr (id (Eq._oldrec (Eq.refl ((r • A_1) • M_1 = r • A_1 • M_1)) (algebra.smul_def r A_1)))
(eq.mpr
(id
(Eq._oldrec (Eq.refl ((coe_fn (algebra_map R A) r * A_1) • M_1 = r • A_1 • M_1))
(mul_smul (coe_fn (algebra_map R A) r) A_1 M_1)))
(Eq.refl (coe_fn (algebra_map R A) r • A_1 • M_1)))
protected instance submodule.restricted_module (R : Type u_1) (A : Type u_2) (M : Type u_3)
[comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A] [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule A M]
(V : submodule A M) : semimodule R ↥V :=
restrict_scalars.semimodule R A ↥V
protected instance submodule.restricted_module_is_scalar_tower (R : Type u_1) (A : Type u_2)
(M : Type u_3) [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A] [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule A M]
(V : submodule A M) : is_scalar_tower R A ↥V :=
restrict_scalars.is_scalar_tower R A ↥V
namespace submodule
/--
`V.restrict_scalars R` is the `R`-submodule of the `R`-module given by restriction of scalars,
corresponding to `V`, an `S`-submodule of the original `S`-module.
-/
def restrict_scalars (R : Type u_1) {A : Type u_2} {M : Type u_3} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[algebra R A] [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule R M] [semimodule A M] [is_scalar_tower R A M]
(V : submodule A M) : submodule R M :=
mk (carrier V) (zero_mem V) sorry sorry
@[simp] theorem restrict_scalars_mem (R : Type u_1) {A : Type u_2} {M : Type u_3} [comm_semiring R]
[semiring A] [algebra R A] [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule R M] [semimodule A M]
[is_scalar_tower R A M] (V : submodule A M) (m : M) : m ∈ restrict_scalars R V ↔ m ∈ V :=
iff.refl (m ∈ restrict_scalars R V)
theorem restrict_scalars_injective (R : Type u_1) (A : Type u_2) (M : Type u_3) [comm_semiring R]
[semiring A] [algebra R A] [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule R M] [semimodule A M]
[is_scalar_tower R A M] : function.injective (restrict_scalars R) :=
fun (V₁ V₂ : submodule A M) (h : restrict_scalars R V₁ = restrict_scalars R V₂) =>
ext (eq.mpr (Eq.refl (∀ (x : M), x ∈ V₁ ↔ x ∈ V₂)) (iff.mp set.ext_iff (iff.mp ext'_iff h)))
@[simp] theorem restrict_scalars_inj (R : Type u_1) (A : Type u_2) (M : Type u_3) [comm_semiring R]
[semiring A] [algebra R A] [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule R M] [semimodule A M]
[is_scalar_tower R A M] {V₁ : submodule A M} {V₂ : submodule A M} :
restrict_scalars R V₁ = restrict_scalars R V₂ ↔ V₁ = V₂ :=
{ mp :=
fun (h : restrict_scalars R V₁ = restrict_scalars R V₂) => restrict_scalars_injective R A M h,
mpr := congr_arg fun {V₁ : submodule A M} => restrict_scalars R V₁ }
@[simp] theorem restrict_scalars_bot (R : Type u_1) (A : Type u_2) (M : Type u_3) [comm_semiring R]
[semiring A] [algebra R A] [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule R M] [semimodule A M]
[is_scalar_tower R A M] : restrict_scalars R ⊥ = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem restrict_scalars_top (R : Type u_1) (A : Type u_2) (M : Type u_3) [comm_semiring R]
[semiring A] [algebra R A] [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule R M] [semimodule A M]
[is_scalar_tower R A M] : restrict_scalars R ⊤ = ⊤ :=
rfl
end submodule
@[simp] theorem linear_map.ker_restrict_scalars (R : Type u_1) {A : Type u_2} {M : Type u_3}
{N : Type u_4} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A] [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule R M]
[semimodule A M] [is_scalar_tower R A M] [add_comm_monoid N] [semimodule R N] [semimodule A N]
[is_scalar_tower R A N] (f : linear_map A M N) :
linear_map.ker (linear_map.restrict_scalars R f) =
submodule.restrict_scalars R (linear_map.ker f) :=
rfl
namespace linear_map
/-! When `V` is an `R`-module and `W` is an `S`-module, where `S` is an algebra over `R`, then
the collection of `R`-linear maps from `V` to `W` admits an `S`-module structure, given by
multiplication in the target. -/
protected instance is_scalar_tower_extend_scalars (R : Type u_1) [comm_semiring R] (S : Type u_2)
[semiring S] [algebra R S] (V : Type u_3) [add_comm_monoid V] [semimodule R V] (W : Type u_4)
[add_comm_monoid W] [semimodule R W] [semimodule S W] [is_scalar_tower R S W] :
is_scalar_tower R S (linear_map R V W) :=
sorry
/-- When `f` is a linear map taking values in `S`, then `λb, f b • x` is a linear map. -/
def smul_algebra_right {R : Type u_1} [comm_semiring R] {S : Type u_2} [semiring S] [algebra R S]
{V : Type u_3} [add_comm_monoid V] [semimodule R V] {W : Type u_4} [add_comm_monoid W]
[semimodule R W] [semimodule S W] [is_scalar_tower R S W] (f : linear_map R V S) (x : W) :
linear_map R V W :=
mk (fun (b : V) => coe_fn f b • x) sorry sorry
@[simp] theorem smul_algebra_right_apply {R : Type u_1} [comm_semiring R] {S : Type u_2}
[semiring S] [algebra R S] {V : Type u_3} [add_comm_monoid V] [semimodule R V] {W : Type u_4}
[add_comm_monoid W] [semimodule R W] [semimodule S W] [is_scalar_tower R S W]
(f : linear_map R V S) (x : W) (c : V) : coe_fn (smul_algebra_right f x) c = coe_fn f c • x :=
rfl
end Mathlib |
0763cbcd22abbd4db55897bfcae20a1e66922bb8 | 92b50235facfbc08dfe7f334827d47281471333b | /library/data/fin.lean | 57f8dfd82f8cad358b97bf83243009cf0054d3e3 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | htzh/lean | 24f6ed7510ab637379ec31af406d12584d31792c | d70c79f4e30aafecdfc4a60b5d3512199200ab6e | refs/heads/master | 1,607,677,731,270 | 1,437,089,952,000 | 1,437,089,952,000 | 37,078,816 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,433,780,956,000 | 1,433,780,955,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,250 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Haitao Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Haitao Zhang, Leonardo de Moura
Finite ordinal types.
-/
import data.list.basic data.finset.basic data.fintype.card algebra.group
open eq.ops nat function list finset fintype
structure fin (n : nat) := (val : nat) (is_lt : val < n)
definition less_than [reducible] := fin
namespace fin
attribute fin.val [coercion]
section def_equal
variable {n : nat}
lemma eq_of_veq : ∀ {i j : fin n}, (val i) = j → i = j
| (mk iv ilt) (mk jv jlt) := assume (veq : iv = jv), begin congruence, assumption end
lemma veq_of_eq : ∀ {i j : fin n}, i = j → (val i) = j
| (mk iv ilt) (mk jv jlt) := assume Peq,
have veq : iv = jv, from fin.no_confusion Peq (λ Pe Pqe, Pe), veq
lemma eq_iff_veq : ∀ {i j : fin n}, (val i) = j ↔ i = j :=
take i j, iff.intro eq_of_veq veq_of_eq
definition val_inj := @eq_of_veq n
end def_equal
section
open decidable
protected definition has_decidable_eq [instance] (n : nat) : ∀ (i j : fin n), decidable (i = j)
| (mk ival ilt) (mk jval jlt) :=
match nat.has_decidable_eq ival jval with
| inl veq := inl (by substvars)
| inr vne := inr (by intro h; injection h; contradiction)
end
end
lemma dinj_lt (n : nat) : dinj (λ i, i < n) fin.mk :=
take a1 a2 Pa1 Pa2 Pmkeq, fin.no_confusion Pmkeq (λ Pe Pqe, Pe)
lemma val_mk (n i : nat) (Plt : i < n) : fin.val (fin.mk i Plt) = i := rfl
definition upto [reducible] (n : nat) : list (fin n) :=
dmap (λ i, i < n) fin.mk (list.upto n)
lemma nodup_upto (n : nat) : nodup (upto n) :=
dmap_nodup_of_dinj (dinj_lt n) (list.nodup_upto n)
lemma mem_upto (n : nat) : ∀ (i : fin n), i ∈ upto n :=
take i, fin.destruct i
(take ival Piltn,
assert Pin : ival ∈ list.upto n, from mem_upto_of_lt Piltn,
mem_dmap Piltn Pin)
lemma upto_zero : upto 0 = [] :=
by rewrite [↑upto, list.upto_nil, dmap_nil]
lemma map_val_upto (n : nat) : map fin.val (upto n) = list.upto n :=
map_dmap_of_inv_of_pos (val_mk n) (@lt_of_mem_upto n)
lemma length_upto (n : nat) : length (upto n) = n :=
calc
length (upto n) = length (list.upto n) : (map_val_upto n ▸ length_map fin.val (upto n))⁻¹
... = n : list.length_upto n
definition is_fintype [instance] (n : nat) : fintype (fin n) :=
fintype.mk (upto n) (nodup_upto n) (mem_upto n)
section pigeonhole
open fintype
lemma card_fin (n : nat) : card (fin n) = n := length_upto n
theorem pigeonhole {n m : nat} (Pmltn : m < n) : ¬∃ f : fin n → fin m, injective f :=
assume Pex, absurd Pmltn (not_lt_of_ge
(calc
n = card (fin n) : card_fin
... ≤ card (fin m) : card_le_of_inj (fin n) (fin m) Pex
... = m : card_fin))
end pigeonhole
definition zero (n : nat) : fin (succ n) :=
mk 0 !zero_lt_succ
definition mk_mod [reducible] (n i : nat) : fin (succ n) :=
mk (i mod (succ n)) (mod_lt _ !zero_lt_succ)
variable {n : nat}
theorem val_lt : ∀ i : fin n, val i < n
| (mk v h) := h
lemma max_lt (i j : fin n) : max i j < n :=
max_lt (is_lt i) (is_lt j)
definition lift : fin n → Π m, fin (n + m)
| (mk v h) m := mk v (lt_add_of_lt_right h m)
definition lift_succ (i : fin n) : fin (nat.succ n) :=
lift i 1
definition maxi [reducible] : fin (succ n) :=
mk n !lt_succ_self
theorem val_lift : ∀ (i : fin n) (m : nat), val i = val (lift i m)
| (mk v h) m := rfl
lemma mk_succ_ne_zero {i : nat} : ∀ {P}, mk (succ i) P ≠ zero n :=
assume P Pe, absurd (veq_of_eq Pe) !succ_ne_zero
lemma mk_mod_eq {i : fin (succ n)} : i = mk_mod n i :=
eq_of_veq begin rewrite [↑mk_mod, mod_eq_of_lt !is_lt] end
lemma mk_mod_of_lt {i : nat} (Plt : i < succ n) : mk_mod n i = mk i Plt :=
begin esimp [mk_mod], congruence, exact mod_eq_of_lt Plt end
section lift_lower
lemma lift_zero : lift_succ (zero n) = zero (succ n) := rfl
lemma ne_max_of_lt_max {i : fin (succ n)} : i < n → i ≠ maxi :=
by intro hlt he; substvars; exact absurd hlt (lt.irrefl n)
lemma lt_max_of_ne_max {i : fin (succ n)} : i ≠ maxi → i < n :=
assume hne : i ≠ maxi,
assert visn : val i < nat.succ n, from val_lt i,
assert aux : val (@maxi n) = n, from rfl,
assert vne : val i ≠ n, from
assume he,
have vivm : val i = val (@maxi n), from he ⬝ aux⁻¹,
absurd (eq_of_veq vivm) hne,
lt_of_le_of_ne (le_of_lt_succ visn) vne
lemma lift_succ_ne_max {i : fin n} : lift_succ i ≠ maxi :=
begin
cases i with v hlt, esimp [lift_succ, lift, max], intro he,
injection he, substvars,
exact absurd hlt (lt.irrefl v)
end
lemma lift_succ_inj : injective (@lift_succ n) :=
take i j, destruct i (destruct j (take iv ilt jv jlt Pmkeq,
begin congruence, apply fin.no_confusion Pmkeq, intros, assumption end))
lemma lt_of_inj_of_max (f : fin (succ n) → fin (succ n)) :
injective f → (f maxi = maxi) → ∀ i, i < n → f i < n :=
assume Pinj Peq, take i, assume Pilt,
assert P1 : f i = f maxi → i = maxi, from assume Peq, Pinj i maxi Peq,
have P : f i ≠ maxi, from
begin rewrite -Peq, intro P2, apply absurd (P1 P2) (ne_max_of_lt_max Pilt) end,
lt_max_of_ne_max P
definition lift_fun : (fin n → fin n) → (fin (succ n) → fin (succ n)) :=
λ f i, dite (i = maxi) (λ Pe, maxi) (λ Pne, lift_succ (f (mk i (lt_max_of_ne_max Pne))))
definition lower_inj (f : fin (succ n) → fin (succ n)) (inj : injective f) :
f maxi = maxi → fin n → fin n :=
assume Peq, take i, mk (f (lift_succ i)) (lt_of_inj_of_max f inj Peq (lift_succ i) (lt_max_of_ne_max lift_succ_ne_max))
lemma lift_fun_max {f : fin n → fin n} : lift_fun f maxi = maxi :=
begin rewrite [↑lift_fun, dif_pos rfl] end
lemma lift_fun_of_ne_max {f : fin n → fin n} {i} (Pne : i ≠ maxi) :
lift_fun f i = lift_succ (f (mk i (lt_max_of_ne_max Pne))) :=
begin rewrite [↑lift_fun, dif_neg Pne] end
lemma lift_fun_eq {f : fin n → fin n} {i : fin n} :
lift_fun f (lift_succ i) = lift_succ (f i) :=
begin
rewrite [lift_fun_of_ne_max lift_succ_ne_max], congruence, congruence,
rewrite [-eq_iff_veq], esimp, rewrite [↑lift_succ, -val_lift]
end
lemma lift_fun_of_inj {f : fin n → fin n} : injective f → injective (lift_fun f) :=
assume Pinj, take i j,
assert Pdi : decidable (i = maxi), from _, assert Pdj : decidable (j = maxi), from _,
begin
cases Pdi with Pimax Pinmax,
cases Pdj with Pjmax Pjnmax,
substvars, intros, exact rfl,
substvars, rewrite [lift_fun_max, lift_fun_of_ne_max Pjnmax],
intro Plmax, apply absurd Plmax⁻¹ lift_succ_ne_max,
cases Pdj with Pjmax Pjnmax,
substvars, rewrite [lift_fun_max, lift_fun_of_ne_max Pinmax],
intro Plmax, apply absurd Plmax lift_succ_ne_max,
rewrite [lift_fun_of_ne_max Pinmax, lift_fun_of_ne_max Pjnmax],
intro Peq, rewrite [-eq_iff_veq],
exact veq_of_eq (Pinj (lift_succ_inj Peq))
end
lemma lift_fun_inj : injective (@lift_fun n) :=
take f₁ f₂ Peq, funext (λ i,
assert Peqi : lift_fun f₁ (lift_succ i) = lift_fun f₂ (lift_succ i), from congr_fun Peq _,
begin revert Peqi, rewrite [*lift_fun_eq], apply lift_succ_inj end)
lemma lower_inj_apply {f Pinj Pmax} (i : fin n) :
val (lower_inj f Pinj Pmax i) = val (f (lift_succ i)) :=
by rewrite [↑lower_inj]
end lift_lower
section madd
definition madd (i j : fin (succ n)) : fin (succ n) :=
mk ((i + j) mod (succ n)) (mod_lt _ !zero_lt_succ)
definition minv : ∀ i : fin (succ n), fin (succ n)
| (mk iv ilt) := mk ((succ n - iv) mod succ n) (mod_lt _ !zero_lt_succ)
lemma val_madd : ∀ i j : fin (succ n), val (madd i j) = (i + j) mod (succ n)
| (mk iv ilt) (mk jv jlt) := by esimp
lemma madd_inj : ∀ {i : fin (succ n)}, injective (madd i)
| (mk iv ilt) :=
take j₁ j₂, fin.destruct j₁ (fin.destruct j₂ (λ jv₁ jlt₁ jv₂ jlt₂, begin
rewrite [↑madd, -eq_iff_veq],
intro Peq, congruence,
rewrite [-(mod_eq_of_lt jlt₁), -(mod_eq_of_lt jlt₂)],
apply mod_eq_mod_of_add_mod_eq_add_mod_left Peq
end))
lemma madd_mk_mod {i j : nat} : madd (mk_mod n i) (mk_mod n j) = mk_mod n (i+j) :=
eq_of_veq begin esimp [madd, mk_mod], rewrite [ mod_add_mod, add_mod_mod ] end
lemma val_mod : ∀ i : fin (succ n), (val i) mod (succ n) = val i
| (mk iv ilt) := by esimp; rewrite [(mod_eq_of_lt ilt)]
lemma madd_comm (i j : fin (succ n)) : madd i j = madd j i :=
by apply eq_of_veq; rewrite [*val_madd, add.comm (val i)]
lemma zero_madd (i : fin (succ n)) : madd (zero n) i = i :=
by apply eq_of_veq; rewrite [val_madd, ↑zero, nat.zero_add, mod_eq_of_lt (is_lt i)]
lemma madd_zero (i : fin (succ n)) : madd i (zero n) = i :=
!madd_comm ▸ zero_madd i
lemma madd_assoc (i j k : fin (succ n)) : madd (madd i j) k = madd i (madd j k) :=
by apply eq_of_veq; rewrite [*val_madd, mod_add_mod, add_mod_mod, add.assoc (val i)]
lemma madd_left_inv : ∀ i : fin (succ n), madd (minv i) i = zero n
| (mk iv ilt) := eq_of_veq (by
rewrite [val_madd, ↑minv, ↑zero, mod_add_mod, sub_add_cancel (le_of_lt ilt), mod_self])
open algebra
definition madd_is_comm_group [instance] : add_comm_group (fin (succ n)) :=
add_comm_group.mk madd madd_assoc (zero n) zero_madd madd_zero minv madd_left_inv madd_comm
end madd
definition pred : fin n → fin n
| (mk v h) := mk (nat.pred v) (pre_lt_of_lt h)
lemma val_pred : ∀ (i : fin n), val (pred i) = nat.pred (val i)
| (mk v h) := rfl
lemma pred_zero : pred (zero n) = zero n :=
rfl
definition mk_pred (i : nat) (h : succ i < succ n) : fin n :=
mk i (lt_of_succ_lt_succ h)
definition succ : fin n → fin (succ n)
| (mk v h) := mk (nat.succ v) (succ_lt_succ h)
lemma val_succ : ∀ (i : fin n), val (succ i) = nat.succ (val i)
| (mk v h) := rfl
lemma succ_max : fin.succ maxi = (@maxi (nat.succ n)) := rfl
lemma lift_succ.comm : lift_succ ∘ (@succ n) = succ ∘ lift_succ :=
funext take i, eq_of_veq (begin rewrite [↑lift_succ, -val_lift, *val_succ, -val_lift] end)
definition elim0 {C : fin 0 → Type} : Π i : fin 0, C i
| (mk v h) := absurd h !not_lt_zero
definition zero_succ_cases {C : fin (nat.succ n) → Type} :
C (zero n) → (Π j : fin n, C (succ j)) → (Π k : fin (nat.succ n), C k) :=
begin
intros CO CS k,
induction k with [vk, pk],
induction (nat.decidable_lt 0 vk) with [HT, HF],
{ show C (mk vk pk), from
let vj := nat.pred vk in
have HSv : vk = nat.succ vj, from
eq.symm (succ_pred_of_pos HT),
assert pj : vj < n, from
lt_of_succ_lt_succ (eq.subst HSv pk),
have HS : succ (mk vj pj) = mk vk pk, from
val_inj (eq.symm HSv),
eq.rec_on HS (CS (mk vj pj)) },
{ show C (mk vk pk), from
have HOv : vk = 0, from
eq_zero_of_le_zero (le_of_not_gt HF),
have HO : zero n = mk vk pk, from
val_inj (eq.symm HOv),
eq.rec_on HO CO }
end
theorem choice {C : fin n → Type} :
(∀ i : fin n, nonempty (C i)) → nonempty (Π i : fin n, C i) :=
begin
revert C,
induction n with [n, IH],
{ intros C H,
apply nonempty.intro,
exact elim0 },
{ intros C H,
fapply nonempty.elim (H (zero n)),
intro CO,
fapply nonempty.elim (IH (λ i, C (succ i)) (λ i, H (succ i))),
intro CS,
apply nonempty.intro,
exact zero_succ_cases CO CS }
end
section
open list
local postfix `+1`:100 := nat.succ
lemma dmap_map_lift {n : nat} : ∀ l : list nat, (∀ i, i ∈ l → i < n) → dmap (λ i, i < n +1) mk l = map lift_succ (dmap (λ i, i < n) mk l)
| [] := assume Plt, rfl
| (i::l) := assume Plt, begin
rewrite [@dmap_cons_of_pos _ _ (λ i, i < n +1) _ _ _ (lt_succ_of_lt (Plt i !mem_cons)), @dmap_cons_of_pos _ _ (λ i, i < n) _ _ _ (Plt i !mem_cons), map_cons],
congruence,
apply dmap_map_lift,
intro j Pjinl, apply Plt, apply mem_cons_of_mem, assumption end
lemma upto_succ (n : nat) : upto (n +1) = maxi :: map lift_succ (upto n) :=
begin
rewrite [↑fin.upto, list.upto_succ, @dmap_cons_of_pos _ _ (λ i, i < n +1) _ _ _ (nat.self_lt_succ n)],
congruence,
apply dmap_map_lift, apply @list.lt_of_mem_upto
end
definition upto_step : ∀ {n : nat}, fin.upto (n +1) = (map succ (upto n))++[zero n]
| 0 := rfl
| (i +1) := begin rewrite [upto_succ i, map_cons, append_cons, succ_max, upto_succ, -lift_zero],
congruence, rewrite [map_map, -lift_succ.comm, -map_map, -(map_singleton _ (zero i)), -map_append, -upto_step] end
end
end fin
|
612e32d417180cc67748b3189d7957d9fae77013 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/data/set/default_auto.lean | 9f5e8ab36d1aa1f1e774a2002f0457a595b5cc2b | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 188 | lean | import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.data.set.finite
import Mathlib.data.set.intervals.default
import Mathlib.PostPort
namespace Mathlib
end Mathlib |
d4c1c2cf83d5e5afcedaf8d5a1eba655fec9fd9b | 9dc8cecdf3c4634764a18254e94d43da07142918 | /src/data/seq/parallel.lean | 32ecf2e561c6f5c3b6b4e39fc34e4fbc8e14addd | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcommelin/mathlib | d8456447c36c176e14d96d9e76f39841f69d2d9b | ee8279351a2e434c2852345c51b728d22af5a156 | refs/heads/master | 1,664,782,136,488 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 132,563,656 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,663,599,929,000 | 1,525,760,539,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,119 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
Parallel computation of a computable sequence of computations by
a diagonal enumeration.
The important theorems of this operation are proven as
terminates_parallel and exists_of_mem_parallel.
(This operation is nondeterministic in the sense that it does not
honor sequence equivalence (irrelevance of computation time).)
-/
import data.seq.wseq
universes u v
namespace computation
open wseq
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
def parallel.aux2 : list (computation α) → α ⊕ list (computation α) :=
list.foldr (λ c o, match o with
| sum.inl a := sum.inl a
| sum.inr ls := rmap (λ c', c' :: ls) (destruct c)
end) (sum.inr [])
def parallel.aux1 : list (computation α) × wseq (computation α) →
α ⊕ list (computation α) × wseq (computation α)
| (l, S) := rmap (λ l', match seq.destruct S with
| none := (l', nil)
| some (none, S') := (l', S')
| some (some c, S') := (c::l', S')
end) (parallel.aux2 l)
/-- Parallel computation of an infinite stream of computations,
taking the first result -/
def parallel (S : wseq (computation α)) : computation α :=
corec parallel.aux1 ([], S)
theorem terminates_parallel.aux : ∀ {l : list (computation α)} {S c},
c ∈ l → terminates c → terminates (corec parallel.aux1 (l, S)) :=
begin
have lem1 : ∀ l S, (∃ (a : α), parallel.aux2 l = sum.inl a) →
terminates (corec parallel.aux1 (l, S)),
{ intros l S e, cases e with a e,
have this : corec parallel.aux1 (l, S) = return a,
{ apply destruct_eq_ret, simp [parallel.aux1], rw e, simp [rmap] },
rw this, apply_instance },
intros l S c m T, revert l S,
apply @terminates_rec_on _ _ c T _ _,
{ intros a l S m, apply lem1,
induction l with c l IH generalizing m; simp at m, { contradiction },
cases m with e m,
{ rw ←e, simp [parallel.aux2],
cases list.foldr parallel.aux2._match_1 (sum.inr list.nil) l with a' ls,
exacts [⟨a', rfl⟩, ⟨a, rfl⟩] },
{ cases IH m with a' e,
simp [parallel.aux2], simp [parallel.aux2] at e,
rw e, exact ⟨a', rfl⟩ } },
{ intros s IH l S m,
have H1 : ∀ l', parallel.aux2 l = sum.inr l' → s ∈ l',
{ induction l with c l IH' generalizing m;
intros l' e'; simp at m, { contradiction },
cases m with e m; simp [parallel.aux2] at e',
{ rw ←e at e',
cases list.foldr parallel.aux2._match_1 (sum.inr list.nil) l with a' ls;
injection e' with e', rw ←e', simp },
{ induction e : list.foldr parallel.aux2._match_1 (sum.inr list.nil) l with a' ls;
rw e at e', { contradiction },
have := IH' m _ e,
simp [parallel.aux2] at e',
cases destruct c; injection e' with h',
rw ←h', simp [this] } },
induction h : parallel.aux2 l with a l',
{ exact lem1 _ _ ⟨a, h⟩ },
{ have H2 : corec parallel.aux1 (l, S) = think _,
{ apply destruct_eq_think,
simp [parallel.aux1],
rw h, simp [rmap] },
rw H2, apply @computation.think_terminates _ _ _,
have := H1 _ h,
rcases seq.destruct S with _ | ⟨_|c, S'⟩;
simp [parallel.aux1]; apply IH; simp [this] } }
end
theorem terminates_parallel {S : wseq (computation α)}
{c} (h : c ∈ S) [T : terminates c] : terminates (parallel S) :=
suffices ∀ n (l : list (computation α)) S c,
c ∈ l ∨ some (some c) = seq.nth S n →
terminates c → terminates (corec parallel.aux1 (l, S)),
from let ⟨n, h⟩ := h in this n [] S c (or.inr h) T,
begin
intro n, induction n with n IH; intros l S c o T,
{ cases o with a a, { exact terminates_parallel.aux a T },
have H : seq.destruct S = some (some c, _),
{ unfold seq.destruct functor.map, rw ← a, simp },
induction h : parallel.aux2 l with a l';
have C : corec parallel.aux1 (l, S) = _,
{ apply destruct_eq_ret, simp [parallel.aux1], rw [h], simp [rmap] },
{ rw C, resetI, apply_instance },
{ apply destruct_eq_think, simp [parallel.aux1], rw [h, H], simp [rmap] },
{ rw C, apply @computation.think_terminates _ _ _,
apply terminates_parallel.aux _ T, simp } },
{ cases o with a a, { exact terminates_parallel.aux a T },
induction h : parallel.aux2 l with a l';
have C : corec parallel.aux1 (l, S) = _,
{ apply destruct_eq_ret, simp [parallel.aux1], rw [h], simp [rmap] },
{ rw C, resetI, apply_instance },
{ apply destruct_eq_think, simp [parallel.aux1], rw [h], simp [rmap] },
{ rw C, apply @computation.think_terminates _ _ _,
have TT : ∀ l', terminates (corec parallel.aux1 (l', S.tail)),
{ intro, apply IH _ _ _ (or.inr _) T, rw a, cases S with f al, refl },
induction e : seq.nth S 0 with o,
{ have D : seq.destruct S = none,
{ dsimp [seq.destruct], rw e, refl },
rw D, simp [parallel.aux1], have TT := TT l',
rwa [seq.destruct_eq_nil D, seq.tail_nil] at TT },
{ have D : seq.destruct S = some (o, S.tail),
{ dsimp [seq.destruct], rw e, refl },
rw D, cases o with c; simp [parallel.aux1, TT] } } }
end
theorem exists_of_mem_parallel {S : wseq (computation α)}
{a} (h : a ∈ parallel S) : ∃ c ∈ S, a ∈ c :=
suffices ∀ C, a ∈ C → ∀ (l : list (computation α)) S,
corec parallel.aux1 (l, S) = C → ∃ c, (c ∈ l ∨ c ∈ S) ∧ a ∈ c,
from let ⟨c, h1, h2⟩ := this _ h [] S rfl in ⟨c, h1.resolve_left id, h2⟩,
begin
let F : list (computation α) → α ⊕ list (computation α) → Prop,
{ intros l a, cases a with a l',
exact ∃ c ∈ l, a ∈ c,
exact ∀ a', (∃ c ∈ l', a' ∈ c) → (∃ c ∈ l, a' ∈ c) },
have lem1 : ∀ (l : list (computation α)), F l (parallel.aux2 l),
{ intro l, induction l with c l IH; simp [parallel.aux2],
{ intros a h, rcases h with ⟨c, hn, _⟩,
exact false.elim hn },
{ simp [parallel.aux2] at IH,
cases list.foldr parallel.aux2._match_1 (sum.inr list.nil) l with a ls;
simp [parallel.aux2],
{ rcases IH with ⟨c', cl, ac⟩,
refine ⟨c', or.inr cl, ac⟩ },
{ induction h : destruct c with a c'; simp [rmap],
{ refine ⟨c, list.mem_cons_self _ _, _⟩,
rw destruct_eq_ret h,
apply ret_mem },
{ intros a' h, rcases h with ⟨d, dm, ad⟩,
simp at dm, cases dm with e dl,
{ rw e at ad, refine ⟨c, list.mem_cons_self _ _, _⟩,
rw destruct_eq_think h,
exact think_mem ad },
{ cases IH a' ⟨d, dl, ad⟩ with d dm, cases dm with dm ad,
exact ⟨d, or.inr dm, ad⟩ } } } } },
intros C aC, refine mem_rec_on aC _ (λ C' IH, _);
intros l S e; have e' := congr_arg destruct e; have := lem1 l;
simp [parallel.aux1] at e'; cases parallel.aux2 l with a' l'; injection e' with h',
{ rw h' at this, rcases this with ⟨c, cl, ac⟩,
exact ⟨c, or.inl cl, ac⟩ },
{ induction e : seq.destruct S with a; rw e at h',
{ exact let ⟨d, o, ad⟩ := IH _ _ h',
⟨c, cl, ac⟩ := this a ⟨d, o.resolve_right (not_mem_nil _), ad⟩ in
⟨c, or.inl cl, ac⟩ },
{ cases a with o S', cases o with c; simp [parallel.aux1] at h';
rcases IH _ _ h' with ⟨d, dl | dS', ad⟩,
{ exact let ⟨c, cl, ac⟩ := this a ⟨d, dl, ad⟩ in ⟨c, or.inl cl, ac⟩ },
{ refine ⟨d, or.inr _, ad⟩,
rw seq.destruct_eq_cons e,
exact seq.mem_cons_of_mem _ dS' },
{ simp at dl, cases dl with dc dl,
{ rw dc at ad, refine ⟨c, or.inr _, ad⟩,
rw seq.destruct_eq_cons e,
apply seq.mem_cons },
{ exact let ⟨c, cl, ac⟩ := this a ⟨d, dl, ad⟩ in ⟨c, or.inl cl, ac⟩ } },
{ refine ⟨d, or.inr _, ad⟩,
rw seq.destruct_eq_cons e,
exact seq.mem_cons_of_mem _ dS' } } }
end
theorem map_parallel (f : α → β) (S) : map f (parallel S) = parallel (S.map (map f)) :=
begin
refine eq_of_bisim (λ c1 c2, ∃ l S,
c1 = map f (corec parallel.aux1 (l, S)) ∧
c2 = corec parallel.aux1 (l.map (map f), S.map (map f))) _ ⟨[], S, rfl, rfl⟩,
intros c1 c2 h, exact match c1, c2, h with ._, ._, ⟨l, S, rfl, rfl⟩ := begin
clear _match,
have : parallel.aux2 (l.map (map f)) = lmap f (rmap (list.map (map f)) (parallel.aux2 l)),
{ simp [parallel.aux2],
induction l with c l IH; simp, rw [IH],
cases list.foldr parallel.aux2._match_1 (sum.inr list.nil) l; simp [parallel.aux2],
cases destruct c; simp },
simp [parallel.aux1], rw this, cases parallel.aux2 l with a l'; simp,
apply S.cases_on _ (λ c S, _) (λ S, _); simp; simp [parallel.aux1];
exact ⟨_, _, rfl, rfl⟩
end end
end
theorem parallel_empty (S : wseq (computation α)) (h : S.head ~> none) :
parallel S = empty _ :=
eq_empty_of_not_terminates $ λ ⟨⟨a, m⟩⟩,
let ⟨c, cs, ac⟩ := exists_of_mem_parallel m,
⟨n, nm⟩ := exists_nth_of_mem cs,
⟨c', h'⟩ := head_some_of_nth_some nm in by injection h h'
-- The reason this isn't trivial from exists_of_mem_parallel is because it eliminates to Sort
def parallel_rec {S : wseq (computation α)} (C : α → Sort v)
(H : ∀ s ∈ S, ∀ a ∈ s, C a) {a} (h : a ∈ parallel S) : C a :=
begin
let T : wseq (computation (α × computation α)) :=
S.map (λ c, c.map (λ a, (a, c))),
have : S = T.map (map (λ c, c.1)),
{ rw [←wseq.map_comp], refine (wseq.map_id _).symm.trans (congr_arg (λ f, wseq.map f S) _),
funext c, dsimp [id, function.comp], rw [←map_comp], exact (map_id _).symm },
have pe := congr_arg parallel this, rw ←map_parallel at pe,
have h' := h, rw pe at h',
haveI : terminates (parallel T) := (terminates_map_iff _ _).1 ⟨⟨_, h'⟩⟩,
induction e : get (parallel T) with a' c,
have : a ∈ c ∧ c ∈ S,
{ rcases exists_of_mem_map h' with ⟨d, dT, cd⟩,
rw get_eq_of_mem _ dT at e, cases e, dsimp at cd, cases cd,
rcases exists_of_mem_parallel dT with ⟨d', dT', ad'⟩,
rcases wseq.exists_of_mem_map dT' with ⟨c', cs', e'⟩,
rw ←e' at ad',
rcases exists_of_mem_map ad' with ⟨a', ac', e'⟩, injection e' with i1 i2,
constructor, rwa [i1, i2] at ac', rwa i2 at cs' },
cases this with ac cs, apply H _ cs _ ac
end
theorem parallel_promises {S : wseq (computation α)} {a}
(H : ∀ s ∈ S, s ~> a) : parallel S ~> a :=
λ a' ma', let ⟨c, cs, ac⟩ := exists_of_mem_parallel ma' in H _ cs ac
theorem mem_parallel {S : wseq (computation α)} {a}
(H : ∀ s ∈ S, s ~> a) {c} (cs : c ∈ S) (ac : a ∈ c) : a ∈ parallel S :=
by haveI := terminates_of_mem ac; haveI := terminates_parallel cs;
exact mem_of_promises _ (parallel_promises H)
theorem parallel_congr_lem {S T : wseq (computation α)} {a}
(H : S.lift_rel equiv T) : (∀ s ∈ S, s ~> a) ↔ (∀ t ∈ T, t ~> a) :=
⟨λ h1 t tT, let ⟨s, sS, se⟩ := wseq.exists_of_lift_rel_right H tT in
(promises_congr se _).1 (h1 _ sS),
λ h2 s sS, let ⟨t, tT, se⟩ := wseq.exists_of_lift_rel_left H sS in
(promises_congr se _).2 (h2 _ tT)⟩
-- The parallel operation is only deterministic when all computation paths lead to the same value
theorem parallel_congr_left {S T : wseq (computation α)} {a}
(h1 : ∀ s ∈ S, s ~> a) (H : S.lift_rel equiv T) : parallel S ~ parallel T :=
let h2 := (parallel_congr_lem H).1 h1 in
λ a', ⟨λ h, by have aa := parallel_promises h1 h; rw ←aa; rw ←aa at h; exact
let ⟨s, sS, as⟩ := exists_of_mem_parallel h,
⟨t, tT, st⟩ := wseq.exists_of_lift_rel_left H sS,
aT := (st _).1 as in mem_parallel h2 tT aT,
λ h, by have aa := parallel_promises h2 h; rw ←aa; rw ←aa at h; exact
let ⟨s, sS, as⟩ := exists_of_mem_parallel h,
⟨t, tT, st⟩ := wseq.exists_of_lift_rel_right H sS,
aT := (st _).2 as in mem_parallel h1 tT aT⟩
theorem parallel_congr_right {S T : wseq (computation α)} {a}
(h2 : ∀ t ∈ T, t ~> a) (H : S.lift_rel equiv T) : parallel S ~ parallel T :=
parallel_congr_left ((parallel_congr_lem H).2 h2) H
end computation
|
e4ce2622ca8b5e5c59eab682901d8b031ed69d66 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/playground/levelparsertest1.lean | 12a726a3187d40a0fe9442e8a6ee046a31ae5747 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 498 | lean | import init.lean.parser.level
open Lean
open Lean.Parser
def testParser (input : String) : IO Unit :=
do
env ← mkEmptyEnvironment;
levelPTables ← builtinLevelParsingTable.get;
stx ← IO.ofExcept $ runParser env levelPTables input;
IO.println stx
def main (xs : List String) : IO Unit :=
do
testParser "max 0 1";
testParser "(1)";
testParser "u";
testParser "(u)";
testParser "(u+1)";
testParser "(u+1+2)";
testParser "(max u v w)";
testParser "imax u v";
testParser "(max (u+1) v)";
pure ()
|
fa1065bc58cf3fc9aeb78e161c944ab1e9732d9c | 432d948a4d3d242fdfb44b81c9e1b1baacd58617 | /src/algebra/lie/abelian.lean | 268ad1112e4357d8b25cdf8548dde5024d726e34 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | JLimperg/aesop3 | 306cc6570c556568897ed2e508c8869667252e8a | a4a116f650cc7403428e72bd2e2c4cda300fe03f | refs/heads/master | 1,682,884,916,368 | 1,620,320,033,000 | 1,620,320,033,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,931 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import algebra.lie.of_associative
import algebra.lie.ideal_operations
/-!
# Trivial Lie modules and Abelian Lie algebras
The action of a Lie algebra `L` on a module `M` is trivial if `⁅x, m⁆ = 0` for all `x ∈ L` and
`m ∈ M`. In the special case that `M = L` with the adjoint action, triviality corresponds to the
concept of an Abelian Lie algebra.
In this file we define these concepts and provide some related definitions and results.
## Main definitions
* `lie_module.is_trivial`
* `is_lie_abelian`
* `commutative_ring_iff_abelian_lie_ring`
* `lie_module.ker`
* `lie_module.max_triv_submodule`
* `lie_algebra.center`
## Tags
lie algebra, abelian, commutative, center
-/
universes u v w w₁ w₂
/-- A Lie (ring) module is trivial iff all brackets vanish. -/
class lie_module.is_trivial (L : Type v) (M : Type w) [has_bracket L M] [has_zero M] : Prop :=
(trivial : ∀ (x : L) (m : M), ⁅x, m⁆ = 0)
@[simp] lemma trivial_lie_zero (L : Type v) (M : Type w)
[has_bracket L M] [has_zero M] [lie_module.is_trivial L M] (x : L) (m : M) : ⁅x, m⁆ = 0 :=
lie_module.is_trivial.trivial x m
/-- A Lie algebra is Abelian iff it is trivial as a Lie module over itself. -/
abbreviation is_lie_abelian (L : Type v) [has_bracket L L] [has_zero L] : Prop :=
lie_module.is_trivial L L
instance lie_ideal.is_lie_abelian_of_trivial (R : Type u) (L : Type v)
[comm_ring R] [lie_ring L] [lie_algebra R L] (I : lie_ideal R L) [h : lie_module.is_trivial L I] :
is_lie_abelian I :=
{ trivial := λ x y, by apply h.trivial, }
lemma function.injective.is_lie_abelian {R : Type u} {L₁ : Type v} {L₂ : Type w}
[comm_ring R] [lie_ring L₁] [lie_ring L₂] [lie_algebra R L₁] [lie_algebra R L₂]
{f : L₁ →ₗ⁅R⁆ L₂} (h₁ : function.injective f) (h₂ : is_lie_abelian L₂) :
is_lie_abelian L₁ :=
{ trivial := λ x y,
by { apply h₁, rw [lie_hom.map_lie, trivial_lie_zero, lie_hom.map_zero], } }
lemma function.surjective.is_lie_abelian {R : Type u} {L₁ : Type v} {L₂ : Type w}
[comm_ring R] [lie_ring L₁] [lie_ring L₂] [lie_algebra R L₁] [lie_algebra R L₂]
{f : L₁ →ₗ⁅R⁆ L₂} (h₁ : function.surjective f) (h₂ : is_lie_abelian L₁) :
is_lie_abelian L₂ :=
{ trivial := λ x y,
begin
obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ := h₁ x, rw ← hu,
obtain ⟨v, hv⟩ := h₁ y, rw ← hv,
rw [← lie_hom.map_lie, trivial_lie_zero, lie_hom.map_zero],
end }
lemma lie_abelian_iff_equiv_lie_abelian {R : Type u} {L₁ : Type v} {L₂ : Type w}
[comm_ring R] [lie_ring L₁] [lie_ring L₂] [lie_algebra R L₁] [lie_algebra R L₂]
(e : L₁ ≃ₗ⁅R⁆ L₂) : is_lie_abelian L₁ ↔ is_lie_abelian L₂ :=
⟨e.symm.injective.is_lie_abelian, e.injective.is_lie_abelian⟩
lemma commutative_ring_iff_abelian_lie_ring {A : Type v} [ring A] :
is_commutative A (*) ↔ is_lie_abelian A :=
begin
have h₁ : is_commutative A (*) ↔ ∀ (a b : A), a * b = b * a := ⟨λ h, h.1, λ h, ⟨h⟩⟩,
have h₂ : is_lie_abelian A ↔ ∀ (a b : A), ⁅a, b⁆ = 0 := ⟨λ h, h.1, λ h, ⟨h⟩⟩,
simp only [h₁, h₂, lie_ring.of_associative_ring_bracket, sub_eq_zero],
end
lemma lie_algebra.is_lie_abelian_bot (R : Type u) (L : Type v)
[comm_ring R] [lie_ring L] [lie_algebra R L] : is_lie_abelian (⊥ : lie_ideal R L) :=
⟨begin
rintros ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩,
suffices : ⁅x, y⁆ = 0,
{ ext, simp only [this, lie_subalgebra.coe_bracket, submodule.coe_mk, submodule.coe_zero], },
change x ∈ (⊥ : lie_ideal R L) at hx, rw lie_submodule.mem_bot at hx, rw [hx, zero_lie],
end⟩
section center
variables (R : Type u) (L : Type v) (M : Type w) (N : Type w₁)
variables [comm_ring R] [lie_ring L] [lie_algebra R L]
variables [add_comm_group M] [module R M] [lie_ring_module L M] [lie_module R L M]
variables [add_comm_group N] [module R N] [lie_ring_module L N] [lie_module R L N]
namespace lie_module
/-- The kernel of the action of a Lie algebra `L` on a Lie module `M` as a Lie ideal in `L`. -/
protected def ker : lie_ideal R L := (to_endomorphism R L M).ker
@[simp] protected lemma mem_ker (x : L) : x ∈ lie_module.ker R L M ↔ ∀ (m : M), ⁅x, m⁆ = 0 :=
begin
dunfold lie_module.ker,
simp only [lie_hom.mem_ker, linear_map.ext_iff, linear_map.zero_apply,
to_endomorphism_apply_apply],
end
/-- The largest submodule of a Lie module `M` on which the Lie algebra `L` acts trivially. -/
def max_triv_submodule : lie_submodule R L M :=
{ carrier := { m | ∀ (x : L), ⁅x, m⁆ = 0 },
zero_mem' := λ x, lie_zero x,
add_mem' := λ x y hx hy z, by rw [lie_add, hx, hy, add_zero],
smul_mem' := λ c x hx y, by rw [lie_smul, hx, smul_zero],
lie_mem := λ x m hm y, by rw [hm, lie_zero], }
@[simp] lemma mem_max_triv_submodule (m : M) :
m ∈ max_triv_submodule R L M ↔ ∀ (x : L), ⁅x, m⁆ = 0 :=
iff.rfl
instance : is_trivial L (max_triv_submodule R L M) :=
{ trivial := λ x m, subtype.ext (m.property x), }
lemma trivial_iff_le_maximal_trivial (N : lie_submodule R L M) :
is_trivial L N ↔ N ≤ max_triv_submodule R L M :=
begin
split,
{ rintros ⟨h⟩, intros m hm x, specialize h x ⟨m, hm⟩, rw subtype.ext_iff at h, exact h, },
{ intros h, constructor, rintros x ⟨m, hm⟩, apply subtype.ext, apply h, exact hm, },
end
lemma is_trivial_iff_max_triv_eq_top :
is_trivial L M ↔ max_triv_submodule R L M = ⊤ :=
begin
split,
{ rintros ⟨h⟩, ext,
simp only [mem_max_triv_submodule, h, forall_const, true_iff, eq_self_iff_true], },
{ intros h, constructor, intros x m, revert x,
rw [← mem_max_triv_submodule R L M, h], exact lie_submodule.mem_top m, },
end
variables {R L M N}
/-- `max_triv_submodule` is functorial. -/
def max_triv_hom (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N) :
max_triv_submodule R L M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ max_triv_submodule R L N :=
{ to_fun := λ m, ⟨f m, λ x, by
{ have h := congr_arg f (m.property x),
rw [lie_module_hom.map_zero, lie_module_hom.map_lie] at h, exact h, }⟩,
map_add' := λ m n, by simpa,
map_smul' := λ t m, by simpa,
map_lie' := λ x m, by simp, }
@[norm_cast, simp] lemma coe_max_triv_hom_apply
(f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N) (m : max_triv_submodule R L M) :
(max_triv_hom f m : N) = f m :=
rfl
/-- The maximal trivial submodules of Lie-equivalent Lie modules are Lie-equivalent. -/
def max_triv_equiv (e : M ≃ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N) :
max_triv_submodule R L M ≃ₗ⁅R,L⁆ max_triv_submodule R L N :=
{ to_fun := max_triv_hom (e : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N),
inv_fun := max_triv_hom (e.symm : N →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M),
left_inv := λ m, by { ext, simp, },
right_inv := λ n, by { ext, simp, },
.. max_triv_hom (e : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N), }
@[norm_cast, simp] lemma coe_max_triv_equiv_apply
(e : M ≃ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N) (m : max_triv_submodule R L M) :
(max_triv_equiv e m : N) = e ↑m :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma max_triv_equiv_of_refl_eq_refl :
max_triv_equiv (lie_module_equiv.refl : M ≃ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M) = lie_module_equiv.refl :=
by { ext, simp only [coe_max_triv_equiv_apply, lie_module_equiv.refl_apply], }
@[simp] lemma max_triv_equiv_of_equiv_symm_eq_symm (e : M ≃ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N) :
(max_triv_equiv e).symm = max_triv_equiv e.symm :=
rfl
/-- A linear map between two Lie modules is a morphism of Lie modules iff the Lie algebra action
on it is trivial. -/
def max_triv_linear_map_equiv_lie_module_hom :
(max_triv_submodule R L (M →ₗ[R] N)) ≃ₗ[R] (M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N) :=
{ to_fun := λ f,
{ map_lie' := λ x m, by
{ have hf : ⁅x, f.val⁆ m = 0, { rw [f.property x, linear_map.zero_apply], },
rw [lie_hom.lie_apply, sub_eq_zero, ← linear_map.to_fun_eq_coe] at hf, exact hf.symm, },
..f.val, },
map_add' := λ f g, by { ext, simp, },
map_smul' := λ F G, by { ext, simp, },
inv_fun := λ F, ⟨F, λ x, by { ext, simp, }⟩,
left_inv := λ f, by simp,
right_inv := λ F, by simp, }
@[simp] lemma coe_max_triv_linear_map_equiv_lie_module_hom
(f : max_triv_submodule R L (M →ₗ[R] N)) :
((max_triv_linear_map_equiv_lie_module_hom f) : M → N) = f :=
by { ext, refl, }
@[simp] lemma coe_max_triv_linear_map_equiv_lie_module_hom_symm
(f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N) :
((max_triv_linear_map_equiv_lie_module_hom.symm f) : M → N) = f :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_linear_map_max_triv_linear_map_equiv_lie_module_hom
(f : max_triv_submodule R L (M →ₗ[R] N)) :
((max_triv_linear_map_equiv_lie_module_hom f) : M →ₗ[R] N) = (f : M →ₗ[R] N) :=
by { ext, refl, }
@[simp] lemma coe_linear_map_max_triv_linear_map_equiv_lie_module_hom_symm
(f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N) :
((max_triv_linear_map_equiv_lie_module_hom.symm f) : M →ₗ[R] N) = (f : M →ₗ[R] N) :=
rfl
end lie_module
namespace lie_algebra
/-- The center of a Lie algebra is the set of elements that commute with everything. It can
be viewed as the maximal trivial submodule of the Lie algebra as a Lie module over itself via the
adjoint representation. -/
abbreviation center : lie_ideal R L := lie_module.max_triv_submodule R L L
instance : is_lie_abelian (center R L) := infer_instance
lemma center_eq_adjoint_kernel : center R L = lie_module.ker R L L :=
begin
ext y,
simp only [lie_module.mem_max_triv_submodule, lie_module.mem_ker,
← lie_skew _ y, neg_eq_zero],
end
lemma abelian_of_le_center (I : lie_ideal R L) (h : I ≤ center R L) : is_lie_abelian I :=
begin
rw ← lie_module.trivial_iff_le_maximal_trivial R L L I at h,
haveI := h, exact lie_ideal.is_lie_abelian_of_trivial R L I,
end
lemma is_lie_abelian_iff_center_eq_top : is_lie_abelian L ↔ center R L = ⊤ :=
lie_module.is_trivial_iff_max_triv_eq_top R L L
end lie_algebra
end center
section ideal_operations
open lie_submodule lie_subalgebra
variables {R : Type u} {L : Type v} {M : Type w}
variables [comm_ring R] [lie_ring L] [lie_algebra R L] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
variables [lie_ring_module L M] [lie_module R L M]
variables (N N' : lie_submodule R L M) (I J : lie_ideal R L)
@[simp] lemma lie_submodule.trivial_lie_oper_zero [lie_module.is_trivial L M] : ⁅I, N⁆ = ⊥ :=
begin
suffices : ⁅I, N⁆ ≤ ⊥, { exact le_bot_iff.mp this, },
rw [lie_ideal_oper_eq_span, lie_submodule.lie_span_le],
rintros m ⟨x, n, h⟩, rw trivial_lie_zero at h, simp [← h],
end
lemma lie_submodule.lie_abelian_iff_lie_self_eq_bot : is_lie_abelian I ↔ ⁅I, I⁆ = ⊥ :=
begin
simp only [_root_.eq_bot_iff, lie_ideal_oper_eq_span, lie_submodule.lie_span_le,
lie_submodule.bot_coe, set.subset_singleton_iff, set.mem_set_of_eq, exists_imp_distrib],
split; intros h,
{ intros z x y hz, rw [← hz, ← coe_bracket, coe_zero_iff_zero], apply h.trivial, },
{ exact ⟨λ x y, by { rw ← coe_zero_iff_zero, apply h _ x y, refl, }⟩, },
end
end ideal_operations
|
a19b5f7b73b723cc270c06fb602f1dcc5087f269 | 69d4931b605e11ca61881fc4f66db50a0a875e39 | /src/topology/unit_interval.lean | 28a1e9a3e9a69ddf6da576926660c32fc8824679 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | abentkamp/mathlib | d9a75d291ec09f4637b0f30cc3880ffb07549ee5 | 5360e476391508e092b5a1e5210bd0ed22dc0755 | refs/heads/master | 1,682,382,954,948 | 1,622,106,077,000 | 1,622,106,077,000 | 149,285,665 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,671 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Scott Morrison
-/
import topology.instances.real
import topology.algebra.field
/-!
# The unit interval, as a topological space
Use `open_locale unit_interval` to turn on the notation `I := set.Icc (0 : ℝ) (1 : ℝ)`.
We provide basic instances, as well as a custom tactic for discharging
`0 ≤ x`, `0 ≤ 1 - x`, `x ≤ 1`, and `1 - x ≤ 1` when `x : I`.
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical topological_space filter
open set
/-! ### The unit interval -/
/-- The unit interval `[0,1]` in ℝ. -/
abbreviation unit_interval : set ℝ := set.Icc 0 1
localized "notation `I` := unit_interval" in unit_interval
namespace unit_interval
lemma mem_iff_one_sub_mem {t : ℝ} : t ∈ I ↔ 1 - t ∈ I :=
begin
rw [mem_Icc, mem_Icc],
split ; intro ; split ; linarith
end
instance has_zero : has_zero I := ⟨⟨0, by split ; norm_num⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ((0 : I) : ℝ) = 0 := rfl
instance has_one : has_one I := ⟨⟨1, by split ; norm_num⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_one : ((1 : I) : ℝ) = 1 := rfl
instance : nonempty I := ⟨0⟩
/-- Unit interval central symmetry. -/
def symm : I → I := λ t, ⟨1 - t.val, mem_iff_one_sub_mem.mp t.property⟩
localized "notation `σ` := unit_interval.symm" in unit_interval
@[simp] lemma symm_zero : σ 0 = 1 :=
subtype.ext $ by simp [symm]
@[simp] lemma symm_one : σ 1 = 0 :=
subtype.ext $ by simp [symm]
@[continuity]
lemma continuous_symm : continuous σ :=
by continuity!
instance : connected_space I :=
subtype.connected_space ⟨nonempty_Icc.mpr zero_le_one, is_preconnected_Icc⟩
/-- Verify there is an instance for `compact_space I`. -/
example : compact_space I := by apply_instance
lemma nonneg (x : I) : 0 ≤ (x : ℝ) := x.2.1
lemma one_minus_nonneg (x : I) : 0 ≤ 1 - (x : ℝ) := by simpa using x.2.2
lemma le_one (x : I) : (x : ℝ) ≤ 1 := x.2.2
lemma one_minus_le_one (x : I) : 1 - (x : ℝ) ≤ 1 := by simpa using x.2.1
end unit_interval
namespace tactic.interactive
/-- A tactic that solves `0 ≤ x`, `0 ≤ 1 - x`, `x ≤ 1`, and `1 - x ≤ 1` for `x : I`. -/
meta def unit_interval : tactic unit :=
`[apply unit_interval.nonneg] <|> `[apply unit_interval.one_minus_nonneg] <|>
`[apply unit_interval.le_one] <|> `[apply unit_interval.one_minus_le_one]
end tactic.interactive
section
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [linear_ordered_field 𝕜] [topological_space 𝕜] [topological_ring 𝕜]
/--
The image of `[0,1]` under the homeomorphism `λ x, a * x + b` is `[b, a+b]`.
-/
-- We only need the ordering on `𝕜` here to avoid talking about flipping the interval over.
-- At the end of the day I only care about `ℝ`, so I'm hesitant to put work into generalizing.
lemma affine_homeomorph_image_I (a b : 𝕜) (h : 0 < a) :
affine_homeomorph a b h.ne.symm '' set.Icc 0 1 = set.Icc b (a + b) :=
by simp [h]
/--
The affine homeomorphism from a nontrivial interval `[a,b]` to `[0,1]`.
-/
def Icc_homeo_I (a b : 𝕜) (h : a < b) : set.Icc a b ≃ₜ set.Icc (0 : 𝕜) (1 : 𝕜) :=
begin
let e := homeomorph.image (affine_homeomorph (b-a) a (sub_pos.mpr h).ne.symm) (set.Icc 0 1),
refine (e.trans _).symm,
apply homeomorph.set_congr,
simp [sub_pos.mpr h],
end
@[simp] lemma Icc_homeo_I_apply_coe (a b : 𝕜) (h : a < b) (x : set.Icc a b) :
((Icc_homeo_I a b h) x : 𝕜) = (x - a) / (b - a) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma Icc_homeo_I_symm_apply_coe (a b : 𝕜) (h : a < b) (x : set.Icc (0 : 𝕜) (1 : 𝕜)) :
((Icc_homeo_I a b h).symm x : 𝕜) = (b - a) * x + a :=
rfl
end
|
bc1f062a50744d8868d8942ce0f2c7ec986041c1 | 7cef822f3b952965621309e88eadf618da0c8ae9 | /src/algebra/category/CommRing/basic.lean | cdc08c31c835d33062ef807c6f4ee53d6b82e74d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | rmitta/mathlib | 8d90aee30b4db2b013e01f62c33f297d7e64a43d | 883d974b608845bad30ae19e27e33c285200bf84 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,776,832,544 | 1,576,874,096,000 | 1,576,874,096,000 | 153,663,165 | 0 | 2 | Apache-2.0 | 1,544,806,490,000 | 1,539,884,365,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,420 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import algebra.category.Group
import category_theory.fully_faithful
import algebra.ring
import data.int.basic
/-!
# Category instances for semiring, ring, comm_semiring, and comm_ring.
We introduce the bundled categories:
* `SemiRing`
* `Ring`
* `CommSemiRing`
* `CommRing`
along with the relevant forgetful functors between them.
## Implementation notes
See the note [locally reducible category instances].
-/
universes u v
open category_theory
/-- The category of semirings. -/
def SemiRing : Type (u+1) := bundled semiring
namespace SemiRing
/-- Construct a bundled SemiRing from the underlying type and typeclass. -/
def of (R : Type u) [semiring R] : SemiRing := bundled.of R
local attribute [reducible] SemiRing
instance : has_coe_to_sort SemiRing := infer_instance -- short-circuit type class inference
instance (R : SemiRing) : semiring R := R.str
instance bundled_hom : bundled_hom @ring_hom :=
⟨@ring_hom.to_fun, @ring_hom.id, @ring_hom.comp, @ring_hom.coe_inj⟩
instance : concrete_category SemiRing := infer_instance -- short-circuit type class inference
instance has_forget_to_Mon : has_forget₂ SemiRing Mon :=
bundled_hom.mk_has_forget₂ @semiring.to_monoid (λ R₁ R₂, ring_hom.to_monoid_hom) (λ _ _ _, rfl)
instance has_forget_to_AddCommMon : has_forget₂ SemiRing AddCommMon :=
-- can't use bundled_hom.mk_has_forget₂, since AddCommMon is an induced category
{ forget₂ :=
{ obj := λ R, AddCommMon.of R,
map := λ R₁ R₂ f, ring_hom.to_add_monoid_hom f } }
end SemiRing
/-- The category of rings. -/
def Ring : Type (u+1) := induced_category SemiRing (bundled.map @ring.to_semiring)
namespace Ring
/-- Construct a bundled Ring from the underlying type and typeclass. -/
def of (R : Type u) [ring R] : Ring := bundled.of R
local attribute [reducible] Ring
instance : has_coe_to_sort Ring := infer_instance -- short-circuit type class inference
instance (R : Ring) : ring R := R.str
instance : concrete_category Ring := infer_instance -- short-circuit type class inference
instance has_forget_to_SemiRing : has_forget₂ Ring SemiRing := infer_instance -- short-circuit type class inference
instance has_forget_to_AddCommGroup : has_forget₂ Ring AddCommGroup :=
-- can't use bundled_hom.mk_has_forget₂, since AddCommGroup is an induced category
{ forget₂ :=
{ obj := λ R, AddCommGroup.of R,
map := λ R₁ R₂ f, ring_hom.to_add_monoid_hom f } }
end Ring
/-- The category of commutative semirings. -/
def CommSemiRing : Type (u+1) := induced_category SemiRing (bundled.map comm_semiring.to_semiring)
namespace CommSemiRing
/-- Construct a bundled CommSemiRing from the underlying type and typeclass. -/
def of (R : Type u) [comm_semiring R] : CommSemiRing := bundled.of R
local attribute [reducible] CommSemiRing
instance : has_coe_to_sort CommSemiRing := infer_instance -- short-circuit type class inference
instance (R : CommSemiRing) : comm_semiring R := R.str
instance : concrete_category CommSemiRing := infer_instance -- short-circuit type class inference
instance has_forget_to_SemiRing : has_forget₂ CommSemiRing SemiRing := infer_instance -- short-circuit type class inference
/-- The forgetful functor from commutative rings to (multiplicative) commutative monoids. -/
instance has_forget_to_CommMon : has_forget₂ CommSemiRing CommMon :=
has_forget₂.mk'
(λ R : CommSemiRing, CommMon.of R) (λ R, rfl)
(λ R₁ R₂ f, f.to_monoid_hom) (by tidy)
end CommSemiRing
/-- The category of commutative rings. -/
def CommRing : Type (u+1) := induced_category Ring (bundled.map comm_ring.to_ring)
namespace CommRing
/-- Construct a bundled CommRing from the underlying type and typeclass. -/
def of (R : Type u) [comm_ring R] : CommRing := bundled.of R
local attribute [reducible] CommRing
instance : has_coe_to_sort CommRing := infer_instance -- short-circuit type class inference
instance (R : CommRing) : comm_ring R := R.str
instance : concrete_category CommRing := infer_instance -- short-circuit type class inference
instance has_forget_to_Ring : has_forget₂ CommRing Ring := infer_instance -- short-circuit type class inference
/-- The forgetful functor from commutative rings to (multiplicative) commutative monoids. -/
instance has_forget_to_CommSemiRing : has_forget₂ CommRing CommSemiRing :=
has_forget₂.mk' (λ R : CommRing, CommSemiRing.of R) (λ R, rfl) (λ R₁ R₂ f, f) (by tidy)
end CommRing
namespace ring_equiv
variables {X Y : Type u}
/-- Build an isomorphism in the category `Ring` from a `ring_equiv` between `ring`s. -/
@[simps] def to_Ring_iso [ring X] [ring Y] (e : X ≃+* Y) : Ring.of X ≅ Ring.of Y :=
{ hom := e.to_ring_hom,
inv := e.symm.to_ring_hom }
/-- Build an isomorphism in the category `CommRing` from a `ring_equiv` between `comm_ring`s. -/
@[simps] def to_CommRing_iso [comm_ring X] [comm_ring Y] (e : X ≃+* Y) : CommRing.of X ≅ CommRing.of Y :=
{ hom := e.to_ring_hom,
inv := e.symm.to_ring_hom }
end ring_equiv
namespace category_theory.iso
/-- Build a `ring_equiv` from an isomorphism in the category `Ring`. -/
def Ring_iso_to_ring_equiv {X Y : Ring.{u}} (i : X ≅ Y) : X ≃+* Y :=
{ to_fun := i.hom,
inv_fun := i.inv,
left_inv := by tidy,
right_inv := by tidy,
map_add' := by tidy,
map_mul' := by tidy }.
/-- Build a `ring_equiv` from an isomorphism in the category `CommRing`. -/
def CommRing_iso_to_ring_equiv {X Y : CommRing.{u}} (i : X ≅ Y) : X ≃+* Y :=
{ to_fun := i.hom,
inv_fun := i.inv,
left_inv := by tidy,
right_inv := by tidy,
map_add' := by tidy,
map_mul' := by tidy }.
end category_theory.iso
/-- ring equivalences between `ring`s are the same as (isomorphic to) isomorphisms in `Ring`. -/
def ring_equiv_iso_Ring_iso {X Y : Type u} [ring X] [ring Y] :
(X ≃+* Y) ≅ (Ring.of X ≅ Ring.of Y) :=
{ hom := λ e, e.to_Ring_iso,
inv := λ i, i.Ring_iso_to_ring_equiv, }
/-- ring equivalences between `comm_ring`s are the same as (isomorphic to) isomorphisms in `CommRing`. -/
def ring_equiv_iso_CommRing_iso {X Y : Type u} [comm_ring X] [comm_ring Y] :
(X ≃+* Y) ≅ (CommRing.of X ≅ CommRing.of Y) :=
{ hom := λ e, e.to_CommRing_iso,
inv := λ i, i.CommRing_iso_to_ring_equiv, }
|
ad9262a11c5d2ec1ce6ff780223bff75484aa60e | 63abd62053d479eae5abf4951554e1064a4c45b4 | /src/data/finsupp/lattice.lean | 9c84d5e819270a097a76475b8403d4c7843d4d4e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Lix0120/mathlib | 0020745240315ed0e517cbf32e738d8f9811dd80 | e14c37827456fc6707f31b4d1d16f1f3a3205e91 | refs/heads/master | 1,673,102,855,024 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 308,930,245 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,604,164,710,000 | 1,604,163,547,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,248 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import data.finsupp.basic
import algebra.ordered_group
/-!
# Lattice structure on finsupps
This file provides instances of ordered structures on finsupps.
-/
open_locale classical
noncomputable theory
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} [has_zero β] {μ : Type*} [canonically_ordered_add_monoid μ]
variables {γ : Type*} [canonically_linear_ordered_add_monoid γ]
namespace finsupp
lemma le_def [partial_order β] {a b : α →₀ β} : a ≤ b ↔ ∀ (s : α), a s ≤ b s := by refl
instance : order_bot (α →₀ μ) :=
{ bot := 0, bot_le := by simp [finsupp.le_def, ← bot_eq_zero], .. finsupp.partial_order}
instance [semilattice_inf β] : semilattice_inf (α →₀ β) :=
{ inf := zip_with (⊓) inf_idem,
inf_le_left := λ a b c, inf_le_left,
inf_le_right := λ a b c, inf_le_right,
le_inf := λ a b c h1 h2 s, le_inf (h1 s) (h2 s),
..finsupp.partial_order, }
@[simp]
lemma inf_apply [semilattice_inf β] {a : α} {f g : α →₀ β} : (f ⊓ g) a = f a ⊓ g a := rfl
@[simp]
lemma support_inf {f g : α →₀ γ} : (f ⊓ g).support = f.support ∩ g.support :=
begin
ext, simp only [inf_apply, mem_support_iff, ne.def,
finset.mem_union, finset.mem_filter, finset.mem_inter],
rw [← decidable.not_or_iff_and_not, ← not_congr],
rw inf_eq_min, unfold min, split_ifs;
{ try {apply or_iff_left_of_imp}, try {apply or_iff_right_of_imp}, intro con, rw con at h,
revert h, simp, }
end
instance [semilattice_sup β] : semilattice_sup (α →₀ β) :=
{ sup := zip_with (⊔) sup_idem,
le_sup_left := λ a b c, le_sup_left,
le_sup_right := λ a b c, le_sup_right,
sup_le := λ a b c h1 h2 s, sup_le (h1 s) (h2 s),
..finsupp.partial_order, }
@[simp]
lemma sup_apply [semilattice_sup β] {a : α} {f g : α →₀ β} : (f ⊔ g) a = f a ⊔ g a := rfl
@[simp]
lemma support_sup
{f g : α →₀ γ} : (f ⊔ g).support = f.support ∪ g.support :=
begin
ext, simp only [finset.mem_union, mem_support_iff, sup_apply, ne.def, ← bot_eq_zero],
rw sup_eq_bot_iff, tauto,
end
instance lattice [lattice β] : lattice (α →₀ β) :=
{ .. finsupp.semilattice_inf, .. finsupp.semilattice_sup}
instance semilattice_inf_bot : semilattice_inf_bot (α →₀ γ) :=
{ ..finsupp.order_bot, ..finsupp.lattice}
lemma of_multiset_strict_mono : strict_mono (@finsupp.of_multiset α) :=
begin
unfold strict_mono, intros a b hab, rw lt_iff_le_and_ne at *, split,
{ rw finsupp.le_iff, intros s hs, repeat {rw finsupp.of_multiset_apply},
rw multiset.le_iff_count at hab, apply hab.left },
{ have h := hab.right, contrapose h, simp at *,
apply finsupp.equiv_multiset.symm.injective h }
end
lemma bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : α →₀ γ) = 0 := rfl
lemma disjoint_iff {x y : α →₀ γ} : disjoint x y ↔ disjoint x.support y.support :=
begin
unfold disjoint, repeat {rw le_bot_iff},
rw [finsupp.bot_eq_zero, ← finsupp.support_eq_empty, finsupp.support_inf], refl,
end
/-- The lattice of `finsupp`s to `ℕ` is order-isomorphic to that of `multiset`s. -/
def order_iso_multiset :
(α →₀ ℕ) ≃o multiset α :=
⟨finsupp.equiv_multiset, begin
intros a b, unfold finsupp.equiv_multiset, dsimp,
rw multiset.le_iff_count, simp only [finsupp.count_to_multiset], refl
end ⟩
@[simp] lemma order_iso_multiset_apply {f : α →₀ ℕ} : order_iso_multiset f = f.to_multiset := rfl
@[simp] lemma order_iso_multiset_symm_apply {s : multiset α} :
order_iso_multiset.symm s = s.to_finsupp :=
by { conv_rhs { rw ← (rel_iso.apply_symm_apply order_iso_multiset) s}, simp }
variable [partial_order β]
/-- The order on `finsupp`s over a partial order embeds into the order on functions -/
def order_embedding_to_fun :
(α →₀ β) ↪o (α → β) :=
⟨⟨λ (f : α →₀ β) (a : α), f a, λ f g h, finsupp.ext (λ a, by { dsimp at h, rw h,} )⟩,
λ a b, le_def⟩
@[simp] lemma order_embedding_to_fun_apply {f : α →₀ β} {a : α} :
order_embedding_to_fun f a = f a := rfl
lemma monotone_to_fun : monotone (finsupp.to_fun : (α →₀ β) → (α → β)) := λ f g h a, le_def.1 h a
end finsupp
|
153dc668f3397a20eec2ebb0cf3e45655a70f316 | 9be442d9ec2fcf442516ed6e9e1660aa9071b7bd | /tests/lean/run/sizeof6.lean | 06496411f9e8f08483b0b41ed8c2fe8638e6a5c4 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | EdAyers/lean4 | 57ac632d6b0789cb91fab2170e8c9e40441221bd | 37ba0df5841bde51dbc2329da81ac23d4f6a4de4 | refs/heads/master | 1,676,463,245,298 | 1,660,619,433,000 | 1,660,619,433,000 | 183,433,437 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,657,612,672,000 | 1,556,196,574,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 147 | lean | import Std
inductive Foo where
| mk (args : Std.PersistentArray Foo)
#print Foo.mk.sizeOf_spec
#print Foo._sizeOf_2_eq
#print Foo._sizeOf_3_eq
|
7c6fd85dc9485ab71660ca47f382837f270413ec | 2a70b774d16dbdf5a533432ee0ebab6838df0948 | /_target/deps/mathlib/src/ring_theory/discrete_valuation_ring.lean | 9617c434c3429249568626c10febe6a12beec760 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | hjvromen/lewis | 40b035973df7c77ebf927afab7878c76d05ff758 | 105b675f73630f028ad5d890897a51b3c1146fb0 | refs/heads/master | 1,677,944,636,343 | 1,676,555,301,000 | 1,676,555,301,000 | 327,553,599 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 17,209 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kevin Buzzard. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Buzzard
-/
import ring_theory.principal_ideal_domain
import order.conditionally_complete_lattice
import ring_theory.multiplicity
import ring_theory.valuation.basic
/-!
# Discrete valuation rings
This file defines discrete valuation rings (DVRs) and develops a basic interface
for them.
## Important definitions
There are various definitions of a DVR in the literature; we define a DVR to be a local PID
which is not a field (the first definition in Wikipedia) and prove that this is equivalent
to being a PID with a unique non-zero prime ideal (the definition in Serre's
book "Local Fields").
Let R be an integral domain, assumed to be a principal ideal ring and a local ring.
* `discrete_valuation_ring R` : a predicate expressing that R is a DVR
### Definitions
* `add_val R : R → ℕ` : the additive valuation on a DVR (sending 0 to 0 rather than the
mathematically correct +∞).
TODO -- the multiplicative valuation, taking values in something
like `with_zero (multiplicative ℤ)`?
## Implementation notes
It's a theorem that an element of a DVR is a uniformizer if and only if it's irreducible.
We do not hence define `uniformizer` at all, because we can use `irreducible` instead.
## Tags
discrete valuation ring
-/
open_locale classical
universe u
open ideal local_ring
/-- An integral domain is a *discrete valuation ring* (DVR) if it's a local PID which
is not a field. -/
class discrete_valuation_ring (R : Type u) [integral_domain R]
extends is_principal_ideal_ring R, local_ring R : Prop :=
(not_a_field' : maximal_ideal R ≠ ⊥)
namespace discrete_valuation_ring
variables (R : Type u) [integral_domain R] [discrete_valuation_ring R]
lemma not_a_field : maximal_ideal R ≠ ⊥ := not_a_field'
variable {R}
open principal_ideal_ring
/-- An element of a DVR is irreducible iff it is a uniformizer, that is, generates the
maximal ideal of R -/
theorem irreducible_iff_uniformizer (ϖ : R) :
irreducible ϖ ↔ maximal_ideal R = ideal.span {ϖ} :=
⟨λ hϖ, (eq_maximal_ideal (is_maximal_of_irreducible hϖ)).symm,
begin
intro h,
have h2 : ¬(is_unit ϖ) := show ϖ ∈ maximal_ideal R,
from h.symm ▸ submodule.mem_span_singleton_self ϖ,
refine ⟨h2, _⟩,
intros a b hab,
by_contra h,
push_neg at h,
obtain ⟨ha : a ∈ maximal_ideal R, hb : b ∈ maximal_ideal R⟩ := h,
rw h at ha hb,
rw mem_span_singleton' at ha hb,
rcases ha with ⟨a, rfl⟩,
rcases hb with ⟨b, rfl⟩,
rw (show a * ϖ * (b * ϖ) = ϖ * (ϖ * (a * b)), by ring) at hab,
have h3 := eq_zero_of_mul_eq_self_right _ hab.symm,
{ apply not_a_field R,
simp [h, h3] },
{ intro hh, apply h2,
refine is_unit_of_dvd_one ϖ _,
use a * b, exact hh.symm }
end⟩
variable (R)
/-- Uniformisers exist in a DVR -/
theorem exists_irreducible : ∃ ϖ : R, irreducible ϖ :=
by {simp_rw [irreducible_iff_uniformizer],
exact (is_principal_ideal_ring.principal $ maximal_ideal R).principal}
/-- an integral domain is a DVR iff it's a PID with a unique non-zero prime ideal -/
theorem iff_pid_with_one_nonzero_prime (R : Type u) [integral_domain R] :
discrete_valuation_ring R ↔ is_principal_ideal_ring R ∧ ∃! P : ideal R, P ≠ ⊥ ∧ is_prime P :=
begin
split,
{ intro RDVR,
rcases id RDVR with ⟨RPID, Rlocal, Rnotafield⟩,
split, assumption,
resetI,
use local_ring.maximal_ideal R,
split, split,
{ assumption },
{ apply_instance } ,
{ rintro Q ⟨hQ1, hQ2⟩,
obtain ⟨q, rfl⟩ := (is_principal_ideal_ring.principal Q).1,
have hq : q ≠ 0,
{ rintro rfl,
apply hQ1,
simp },
erw span_singleton_prime hq at hQ2,
replace hQ2 := irreducible_of_prime hQ2,
rw irreducible_iff_uniformizer at hQ2,
exact hQ2.symm } },
{ rintro ⟨RPID, Punique⟩,
haveI : local_ring R := local_of_unique_nonzero_prime R Punique,
refine {not_a_field' := _},
rcases Punique with ⟨P, ⟨hP1, hP2⟩, hP3⟩,
have hPM : P ≤ maximal_ideal R := le_maximal_ideal (hP2.1),
intro h, rw [h, le_bot_iff] at hPM, exact hP1 hPM }
end
lemma associated_of_irreducible {a b : R} (ha : irreducible a) (hb : irreducible b) :
associated a b :=
begin
rw irreducible_iff_uniformizer at ha hb,
rw [←span_singleton_eq_span_singleton, ←ha, hb],
end
end discrete_valuation_ring
namespace discrete_valuation_ring
variable (R : Type*)
/-- Alternative characterisation of discrete valuation rings. -/
def has_unit_mul_pow_irreducible_factorization [integral_domain R] : Prop :=
∃ p : R, irreducible p ∧ ∀ {x : R}, x ≠ 0 → ∃ (n : ℕ), associated (p ^ n) x
namespace has_unit_mul_pow_irreducible_factorization
variables {R} [integral_domain R] (hR : has_unit_mul_pow_irreducible_factorization R)
include hR
lemma unique_irreducible ⦃p q : R⦄ (hp : irreducible p) (hq : irreducible q) :
associated p q :=
begin
rcases hR with ⟨ϖ, hϖ, hR⟩,
suffices : ∀ {p : R} (hp : irreducible p), associated p ϖ,
{ apply associated.trans (this hp) (this hq).symm, },
clear hp hq p q,
intros p hp,
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := hR hp.ne_zero,
have : irreducible (ϖ ^ n) := irreducible_of_associated hn.symm hp,
rcases lt_trichotomy n 1 with (H|rfl|H),
{ obtain rfl : n = 0, { clear hn this, revert H n, exact dec_trivial },
simpa only [not_irreducible_one, pow_zero] using this, },
{ simpa only [pow_one] using hn.symm, },
{ obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ : ∃ k, n = 1 + k + 1 := nat.exists_eq_add_of_lt H,
rw pow_succ at this,
rcases this.2 _ _ rfl with H0|H0,
{ exact (hϖ.not_unit H0).elim, },
{ rw [add_comm, pow_succ] at H0,
exact (hϖ.not_unit (is_unit_of_mul_is_unit_left H0)).elim } }
end
/-- An integral domain in which there is an irreducible element `p`
such that every nonzero element is associated to a power of `p` is a unique factorization domain.
See `discrete_valuation_ring.of_has_unit_mul_pow_irreducible_factorization`. -/
theorem to_unique_factorization_monoid : unique_factorization_monoid R :=
let p := classical.some hR in
let spec := classical.some_spec hR in
unique_factorization_monoid.of_exists_prime_factors $ λ x hx,
begin
use multiset.repeat p (classical.some (spec.2 hx)),
split,
{ intros q hq,
have hpq := multiset.eq_of_mem_repeat hq,
rw hpq,
refine ⟨spec.1.ne_zero, spec.1.not_unit, _⟩,
intros a b h,
by_cases ha : a = 0,
{ rw ha, simp only [true_or, dvd_zero], },
by_cases hb : b = 0,
{ rw hb, simp only [or_true, dvd_zero], },
obtain ⟨m, u, rfl⟩ := spec.2 ha,
rw [mul_assoc, mul_left_comm, is_unit.dvd_mul_left _ _ _ (is_unit_unit _)] at h,
rw is_unit.dvd_mul_right (is_unit_unit _),
by_cases hm : m = 0,
{ simp only [hm, one_mul, pow_zero] at h ⊢, right, exact h },
left,
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hm,
apply dvd_mul_of_dvd_left (dvd_refl _) _ },
{ rw [multiset.prod_repeat], exact (classical.some_spec (spec.2 hx)), }
end
omit hR
lemma of_ufd_of_unique_irreducible [unique_factorization_monoid R]
(h₁ : ∃ p : R, irreducible p)
(h₂ : ∀ ⦃p q : R⦄, irreducible p → irreducible q → associated p q) :
has_unit_mul_pow_irreducible_factorization R :=
begin
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := h₁,
refine ⟨p, hp, _⟩,
intros x hx,
cases wf_dvd_monoid.exists_factors x hx with fx hfx,
refine ⟨fx.card, _⟩,
have H := hfx.2,
rw ← associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated at H ⊢,
rw [← H, ← associates.prod_mk, associates.mk_pow, ← multiset.prod_repeat],
congr' 1,
symmetry,
rw multiset.eq_repeat,
simp only [true_and, and_imp, multiset.card_map, eq_self_iff_true,
multiset.mem_map, exists_imp_distrib],
rintros _ q hq rfl,
rw associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated,
apply h₂ (hfx.1 _ hq) hp,
end
end has_unit_mul_pow_irreducible_factorization
lemma aux_pid_of_ufd_of_unique_irreducible
(R : Type u) [integral_domain R] [unique_factorization_monoid R]
(h₁ : ∃ p : R, irreducible p)
(h₂ : ∀ ⦃p q : R⦄, irreducible p → irreducible q → associated p q) :
is_principal_ideal_ring R :=
begin
constructor,
intro I,
by_cases I0 : I = ⊥, { rw I0, use 0, simp only [set.singleton_zero, submodule.span_zero], },
obtain ⟨x, hxI, hx0⟩ : ∃ x ∈ I, x ≠ (0:R) := I.ne_bot_iff.mp I0,
obtain ⟨p, hp, H⟩ :=
has_unit_mul_pow_irreducible_factorization.of_ufd_of_unique_irreducible h₁ h₂,
have ex : ∃ n : ℕ, p ^ n ∈ I,
{ obtain ⟨n, u, rfl⟩ := H hx0,
refine ⟨n, _⟩,
simpa only [units.mul_inv_cancel_right] using I.mul_mem_right ↑u⁻¹ hxI, },
constructor,
use p ^ (nat.find ex),
show I = ideal.span _,
apply le_antisymm,
{ intros r hr,
by_cases hr0 : r = 0,
{ simp only [hr0, submodule.zero_mem], },
obtain ⟨n, u, rfl⟩ := H hr0,
simp only [mem_span_singleton, is_unit_unit, is_unit.dvd_mul_right],
apply pow_dvd_pow,
apply nat.find_min',
simpa only [units.mul_inv_cancel_right] using I.mul_mem_right ↑u⁻¹ hr, },
{ erw submodule.span_singleton_le_iff_mem,
exact nat.find_spec ex, },
end
/--
A unique factorization domain with at least one irreducible element
in which all irreducible elements are associated
is a discrete valuation ring.
-/
lemma of_ufd_of_unique_irreducible {R : Type u} [integral_domain R] [unique_factorization_monoid R]
(h₁ : ∃ p : R, irreducible p)
(h₂ : ∀ ⦃p q : R⦄, irreducible p → irreducible q → associated p q) :
discrete_valuation_ring R :=
begin
rw iff_pid_with_one_nonzero_prime,
haveI PID : is_principal_ideal_ring R := aux_pid_of_ufd_of_unique_irreducible R h₁ h₂,
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := h₁,
refine ⟨PID, ⟨ideal.span {p}, ⟨_, _⟩, _⟩⟩,
{ rw submodule.ne_bot_iff,
refine ⟨p, ideal.mem_span_singleton.mpr (dvd_refl p), hp.ne_zero⟩, },
{ rwa [ideal.span_singleton_prime hp.ne_zero,
← unique_factorization_monoid.irreducible_iff_prime], },
{ intro I,
rw ← submodule.is_principal.span_singleton_generator I,
rintro ⟨I0, hI⟩,
apply span_singleton_eq_span_singleton.mpr,
apply h₂ _ hp,
erw [ne.def, span_singleton_eq_bot] at I0,
rwa [unique_factorization_monoid.irreducible_iff_prime, ← ideal.span_singleton_prime I0], },
end
/--
An integral domain in which there is an irreducible element `p`
such that every nonzero element is associated to a power of `p`
is a discrete valuation ring.
-/
lemma of_has_unit_mul_pow_irreducible_factorization {R : Type u} [integral_domain R]
(hR : has_unit_mul_pow_irreducible_factorization R) :
discrete_valuation_ring R :=
begin
letI : unique_factorization_monoid R := hR.to_unique_factorization_monoid,
apply of_ufd_of_unique_irreducible _ hR.unique_irreducible,
unfreezingI { obtain ⟨p, hp, H⟩ := hR, exact ⟨p, hp⟩, },
end
section
variables [integral_domain R] [discrete_valuation_ring R]
variable {R}
lemma associated_pow_irreducible {x : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) {ϖ : R} (hirr : irreducible ϖ) :
∃ (n : ℕ), associated x (ϖ ^ n) :=
begin
have : wf_dvd_monoid R := is_noetherian_ring.wf_dvd_monoid,
cases wf_dvd_monoid.exists_factors x hx with fx hfx,
unfreezingI { use fx.card },
have H := hfx.2,
rw ← associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated at H ⊢,
rw [← H, ← associates.prod_mk, associates.mk_pow, ← multiset.prod_repeat],
congr' 1,
rw multiset.eq_repeat,
simp only [true_and, and_imp, multiset.card_map, eq_self_iff_true,
multiset.mem_map, exists_imp_distrib],
rintros _ _ _ rfl,
rw associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated,
refine associated_of_irreducible _ _ hirr,
apply hfx.1,
assumption
end
lemma eq_unit_mul_pow_irreducible {x : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) {ϖ : R} (hirr : irreducible ϖ) :
∃ (n : ℕ) (u : units R), x = u * ϖ ^ n :=
begin
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := associated_pow_irreducible hx hirr,
obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := hn.symm,
use [n, u],
apply mul_comm,
end
open submodule.is_principal
lemma ideal_eq_span_pow_irreducible {s : ideal R} (hs : s ≠ ⊥) {ϖ : R} (hirr : irreducible ϖ) :
∃ n : ℕ, s = ideal.span {ϖ ^ n} :=
begin
have gen_ne_zero : generator s ≠ 0,
{ rw [ne.def, ← eq_bot_iff_generator_eq_zero], assumption },
rcases associated_pow_irreducible gen_ne_zero hirr with ⟨n, u, hnu⟩,
use n,
have : span _ = _ := span_singleton_generator s,
rw [← this, ← hnu, span_singleton_eq_span_singleton],
use u
end
lemma unit_mul_pow_congr_pow {p q : R} (hp : irreducible p) (hq : irreducible q)
(u v : units R) (m n : ℕ) (h : ↑u * p ^ m = v * q ^ n) :
m = n :=
begin
have key : associated (multiset.repeat p m).prod (multiset.repeat q n).prod,
{ rw [multiset.prod_repeat, multiset.prod_repeat, associated],
refine ⟨u * v⁻¹, _⟩,
simp only [units.coe_mul],
rw [mul_left_comm, ← mul_assoc, h, mul_right_comm, units.mul_inv, one_mul], },
have := multiset.card_eq_card_of_rel (unique_factorization_monoid.factors_unique _ _ key),
{ simpa only [multiset.card_repeat] },
all_goals
{ intros x hx, replace hx := multiset.eq_of_mem_repeat hx,
unfreezingI { subst hx, assumption } },
end
lemma unit_mul_pow_congr_unit {ϖ : R} (hirr : irreducible ϖ) (u v : units R) (m n : ℕ)
(h : ↑u * ϖ ^ m = v * ϖ ^ n) :
u = v :=
begin
obtain rfl : m = n := unit_mul_pow_congr_pow hirr hirr u v m n h,
rw ← sub_eq_zero at h,
rw [← sub_mul, mul_eq_zero] at h,
cases h,
{ rw sub_eq_zero at h, exact_mod_cast h },
{ apply (hirr.ne_zero (pow_eq_zero h)).elim, }
end
/-!
## The additive valuation on a DVR
-/
/-- The `ℕ`-valued additive valuation on a DVR (returns junk at `0` rather than `+∞`) -/
noncomputable def add_val (R : Type u) [integral_domain R] [discrete_valuation_ring R] : R → ℕ :=
λ r, if hr : r = 0 then 0 else
classical.some (associated_pow_irreducible hr (classical.some_spec $ exists_irreducible R))
theorem add_val_spec {r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
let ϖ := classical.some (exists_irreducible R) in
let n := classical.some
(associated_pow_irreducible hr (classical.some_spec (exists_irreducible R))) in
associated r (ϖ ^ n) :=
classical.some_spec (associated_pow_irreducible hr (classical.some_spec $ exists_irreducible R))
lemma add_val_def (r : R) (u : units R) {ϖ : R} (hϖ : irreducible ϖ) (n : ℕ) (hr : r = u * ϖ ^ n) :
add_val R r = n :=
begin
subst hr,
let ϖ₀ := classical.some (exists_irreducible R),
have hϖ₀ : irreducible ϖ₀ := classical.some_spec (exists_irreducible R),
have h0 : (u : R) * ϖ ^ n ≠ 0,
{ simp only [units.mul_right_eq_zero, ne.def, pow_ne_zero n hϖ.ne_zero, not_false_iff] },
unfold add_val,
rw dif_neg h0,
obtain ⟨v, hv⟩ := (add_val_spec h0).symm,
rw mul_comm at hv,
refine unit_mul_pow_congr_pow hϖ₀ hϖ _ u _ _ hv,
end
lemma add_val_def' (u : units R) {ϖ : R} (hϖ : irreducible ϖ) (n : ℕ) :
add_val R ((u : R) * ϖ ^ n) = n :=
add_val_def _ u hϖ n rfl
@[simp] lemma add_val_zero : add_val R 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
@[simp] lemma add_val_one : add_val R 1 = 0 :=
add_val_def 1 1 (classical.some_spec $ exists_irreducible R) 0 (by simp)
@[simp] lemma add_val_uniformizer {ϖ : R} (hϖ : irreducible ϖ) : add_val R ϖ = 1 :=
add_val_def ϖ 1 hϖ 1 (by simp)
@[simp] lemma add_val_mul {a b : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
add_val R (a * b) = add_val R a + add_val R b :=
begin
obtain ⟨ϖ, hϖ⟩ := exists_irreducible R,
obtain ⟨m, u, rfl⟩ := eq_unit_mul_pow_irreducible ha hϖ,
obtain ⟨n, v, rfl⟩ := eq_unit_mul_pow_irreducible hb hϖ,
rw mul_mul_mul_comm,
simp only [hϖ, add_val_def', ← pow_add, ← units.coe_mul],
end
lemma add_val_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) : add_val R (a ^ n) = n * add_val R a :=
begin
by_cases ha : a = 0,
{ cases nat.eq_zero_or_pos n with hn hn,
{ simp [ha, hn] },
{ simp [ha, zero_pow hn] } },
induction n with d hd,
{ simp [ha] },
{ rw [pow_succ, add_val_mul ha (pow_ne_zero _ ha), hd], ring}
end
lemma add_val_le_iff_dvd {a b : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) : add_val R a ≤ add_val R b ↔ a ∣ b :=
begin
split,
{ obtain ⟨ϖ, hϖ⟩ := exists_irreducible R,
obtain ⟨m, u, rfl⟩ := eq_unit_mul_pow_irreducible ha hϖ,
obtain ⟨n, v, rfl⟩ := eq_unit_mul_pow_irreducible hb hϖ,
rw [add_val_def' _ hϖ, add_val_def' _ hϖ, le_iff_exists_add],
rintro ⟨q, rfl⟩,
use ((v * u⁻¹ : units R) : R) * ϖ ^ q,
rw [mul_mul_mul_comm, pow_add, units.coe_mul, mul_left_comm ↑u, units.mul_inv, mul_one] },
{ rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩,
rw add_val_mul ha (right_ne_zero_of_mul hb),
simp only [zero_le, le_add_iff_nonneg_right] }
end
lemma add_val_add {a b : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) (hab : a + b ≠ 0) :
min (add_val R a) (add_val R b) ≤ add_val R (a + b) :=
begin
-- wlog is slow but I'm grateful it works.
wlog h : add_val R a ≤ add_val R b := le_total (add_val R a) (add_val R b) using [a b, b a],
rw [min_eq_left h, add_val_le_iff_dvd ha hab],
rw add_val_le_iff_dvd ha hb at h,
exact dvd_add_self_left.mpr h,
end
end
end discrete_valuation_ring
|
ef4ff6e4bcdc4447c5b884f46cd91b2b1f540cc9 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/337.lean | dbf16d131a7922c5d354b2e5d542f175a9ecb8a0 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,472 | lean | section
variable (G : Type 1) (T : Type 1)
(EG : G → G → Type)
(getCtx : T → G)
inductive CtxSyntaxLayer where
inductive TySyntaxLayer where
| arrow : {Γ : G} → (A B : T) → EG Γ (getCtx A) → EG Γ (getCtx B) → TySyntaxLayer
end
section
variable (G : Type 1) (T : Type 1) (Tm : Type 1)
(EG : G → G → Type) (ET : T → T → Type)
(getCtx : T → G) (getTy : Tm → T)
(TAlgebra : TySyntaxLayer G T EG getCtx → T)
inductive TmSyntaxLayer where
| app : {Γ : G} → (A B : T) → (Actx : EG Γ (getCtx A)) → (Bctx : EG Γ (getCtx B))
→ (f x : Tm)
→ ET (getTy f) (TAlgebra (TySyntaxLayer.arrow A B Actx Bctx))
→ ET (getTy x) A
→ TmSyntaxLayer
end
structure Ty where
ctx : Type
ty : ctx → Type
structure Tm where
ty : Ty
tm : ∀ {Γ}, ty.ty Γ
def ECtx : Type → Type → Type := (PLift $ · = ·)
def ETy : Ty → Ty → Type := (PLift $ · = ·)
def ETm : Tm → Tm → Type := (PLift $ · = ·)
def interpTyStep : TySyntaxLayer Type Ty ECtx Ty.ctx → Ty
| TySyntaxLayer.arrow (Γ:=Γ) A B (PLift.up Actx) (PLift.up Bctx) => Ty.mk Γ (λ γ => A.ty (cast Actx γ) → B.ty (cast Bctx γ))
def interpTmStep : TmSyntaxLayer Type Ty Tm ECtx ETy Ty.ctx Tm.ty interpTyStep → Tm
| TmSyntaxLayer.app (Γ:=Γ1) A B (PLift.up Actx) (PLift.up Bctx) { ty := fty , tm := ftm } x (PLift.up fTy) (PLift.up xTy)
=> sorry
|
0d28eab735e3a84fc2bc4fc6becf6f1a1c4b22b8 | 8cb37a089cdb4af3af9d8bf1002b417e407a8e9e | /library/init/data/rbtree/basic.lean | 8d62d804ba54abc24bb0326e4fcc58ca0a7b4669 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kbuzzard/lean | ae3c3db4bb462d750dbf7419b28bafb3ec983ef7 | ed1788fd674bb8991acffc8fca585ec746711928 | refs/heads/master | 1,620,983,366,617 | 1,618,937,600,000 | 1,618,937,600,000 | 359,886,396 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,618,936,987,000 | 1,618,936,987,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,872 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import init.data.ordering
universes u v
inductive rbnode (α : Type u)
| leaf : rbnode
| red_node (lchild : rbnode) (val : α) (rchild : rbnode) : rbnode
| black_node (lchild : rbnode) (val : α) (rchild : rbnode) : rbnode
namespace rbnode
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
inductive color
| red | black
open color nat
instance color.decidable_eq : decidable_eq color :=
λ a b, color.cases_on a
(color.cases_on b (is_true rfl) (is_false (λ h, color.no_confusion h)))
(color.cases_on b (is_false (λ h, color.no_confusion h)) (is_true rfl))
def depth (f : nat → nat → nat) : rbnode α → nat
| leaf := 0
| (red_node l _ r) := succ (f (depth l) (depth r))
| (black_node l _ r) := succ (f (depth l) (depth r))
protected def min : rbnode α → option α
| leaf := none
| (red_node leaf v _) := some v
| (black_node leaf v _) := some v
| (red_node l v _) := min l
| (black_node l v _) := min l
protected def max : rbnode α → option α
| leaf := none
| (red_node _ v leaf) := some v
| (black_node _ v leaf) := some v
| (red_node _ v r) := max r
| (black_node _ v r) := max r
def fold (f : α → β → β) : rbnode α → β → β
| leaf b := b
| (red_node l v r) b := fold r (f v (fold l b))
| (black_node l v r) b := fold r (f v (fold l b))
def rev_fold (f : α → β → β) : rbnode α → β → β
| leaf b := b
| (red_node l v r) b := rev_fold l (f v (rev_fold r b))
| (black_node l v r) b := rev_fold l (f v (rev_fold r b))
def balance1 : rbnode α → α → rbnode α → α → rbnode α → rbnode α
| (red_node l x r₁) y r₂ v t := red_node (black_node l x r₁) y (black_node r₂ v t)
| l₁ y (red_node l₂ x r) v t := red_node (black_node l₁ y l₂) x (black_node r v t)
| l y r v t := black_node (red_node l y r) v t
def balance1_node : rbnode α → α → rbnode α → rbnode α
| (red_node l x r) v t := balance1 l x r v t
| (black_node l x r) v t := balance1 l x r v t
| leaf v t := t /- dummy value -/
def balance2 : rbnode α → α → rbnode α → α → rbnode α → rbnode α
| (red_node l x₁ r₁) y r₂ v t := red_node (black_node t v l) x₁ (black_node r₁ y r₂)
| l₁ y (red_node l₂ x₂ r₂) v t := red_node (black_node t v l₁) y (black_node l₂ x₂ r₂)
| l y r v t := black_node t v (red_node l y r)
def balance2_node : rbnode α → α → rbnode α → rbnode α
| (red_node l x r) v t := balance2 l x r v t
| (black_node l x r) v t := balance2 l x r v t
| leaf v t := t /- dummy -/
def get_color : rbnode α → color
| (red_node _ _ _) := red
| _ := black
section insert
variables (lt : α → α → Prop) [decidable_rel lt]
def ins : rbnode α → α → rbnode α
| leaf x := red_node leaf x leaf
| (red_node a y b) x :=
match cmp_using lt x y with
| ordering.lt := red_node (ins a x) y b
| ordering.eq := red_node a x b
| ordering.gt := red_node a y (ins b x)
end
| (black_node a y b) x :=
match cmp_using lt x y with
| ordering.lt :=
if a.get_color = red then balance1_node (ins a x) y b
else black_node (ins a x) y b
| ordering.eq := black_node a x b
| ordering.gt :=
if b.get_color = red then balance2_node (ins b x) y a
else black_node a y (ins b x)
end
def mk_insert_result : color → rbnode α → rbnode α
| red (red_node l v r) := black_node l v r
| _ t := t
def insert (t : rbnode α) (x : α) : rbnode α :=
mk_insert_result (get_color t) (ins lt t x)
end insert
section membership
variable (lt : α → α → Prop)
def mem : α → rbnode α → Prop
| a leaf := false
| a (red_node l v r) := mem a l ∨ (¬ lt a v ∧ ¬ lt v a) ∨ mem a r
| a (black_node l v r) := mem a l ∨ (¬ lt a v ∧ ¬ lt v a) ∨ mem a r
def mem_exact : α → rbnode α → Prop
| a leaf := false
| a (red_node l v r) := mem_exact a l ∨ a = v ∨ mem_exact a r
| a (black_node l v r) := mem_exact a l ∨ a = v ∨ mem_exact a r
variable [decidable_rel lt]
def find : rbnode α → α → option α
| leaf x := none
| (red_node a y b) x :=
match cmp_using lt x y with
| ordering.lt := find a x
| ordering.eq := some y
| ordering.gt := find b x
end
| (black_node a y b) x :=
match cmp_using lt x y with
| ordering.lt := find a x
| ordering.eq := some y
| ordering.gt := find b x
end
end membership
inductive well_formed (lt : α → α → Prop) : rbnode α → Prop
| leaf_wff : well_formed leaf
| insert_wff {n n' : rbnode α} {x : α} [decidable_rel lt] : well_formed n → n' = insert lt n x → well_formed n'
end rbnode
open rbnode
set_option auto_param.check_exists false
def rbtree (α : Type u) (lt : α → α → Prop . rbtree.default_lt) : Type u :=
{t : rbnode α // t.well_formed lt }
def mk_rbtree (α : Type u) (lt : α → α → Prop . rbtree.default_lt) : rbtree α lt :=
⟨leaf, well_formed.leaf_wff⟩
namespace rbtree
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop}
protected def mem (a : α) (t : rbtree α lt) : Prop :=
rbnode.mem lt a t.val
instance : has_mem α (rbtree α lt) :=
⟨rbtree.mem⟩
def mem_exact (a : α) (t : rbtree α lt) : Prop :=
rbnode.mem_exact a t.val
def depth (f : nat → nat → nat) (t : rbtree α lt) : nat :=
t.val.depth f
def fold (f : α → β → β) : rbtree α lt → β → β
| ⟨t, _⟩ b := t.fold f b
def rev_fold (f : α → β → β) : rbtree α lt → β → β
| ⟨t, _⟩ b := t.rev_fold f b
def empty : rbtree α lt → bool
| ⟨leaf, _⟩ := tt
| _ := ff
def to_list : rbtree α lt → list α
| ⟨t, _⟩ := t.rev_fold (::) []
protected def min : rbtree α lt → option α
| ⟨t, _⟩ := t.min
protected def max : rbtree α lt → option α
| ⟨t, _⟩ := t.max
instance [has_repr α] : has_repr (rbtree α lt) :=
⟨λ t, "rbtree_of " ++ repr t.to_list⟩
variables [decidable_rel lt]
def insert : rbtree α lt → α → rbtree α lt
| ⟨t, w⟩ x := ⟨t.insert lt x, well_formed.insert_wff w rfl⟩
def find : rbtree α lt → α → option α
| ⟨t, _⟩ x := t.find lt x
def contains (t : rbtree α lt) (a : α) : bool :=
(t.find a).is_some
def from_list (l : list α) (lt : α → α → Prop . rbtree.default_lt) [decidable_rel lt] : rbtree α lt :=
l.foldl insert (mk_rbtree α lt)
end rbtree
def rbtree_of {α : Type u} (l : list α) (lt : α → α → Prop . rbtree.default_lt) [decidable_rel lt] : rbtree α lt :=
rbtree.from_list l lt
|
8a97391462f3b17866bb4bb98d55bf5747cc5c66 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/data/nat/pairing_auto.lean | e08c9bed7cf25262d3322b3f14f957bc674acf7b | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,135 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
Elegant pairing function.
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.data.nat.sqrt
import Mathlib.data.set.lattice
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes u_1 u_2
namespace Mathlib
namespace nat
/-- Pairing function for the natural numbers. -/
def mkpair (a : ℕ) (b : ℕ) : ℕ := ite (a < b) (b * b + a) (a * a + a + b)
/-- Unpairing function for the natural numbers. -/
def unpair (n : ℕ) : ℕ × ℕ :=
let s : ℕ := sqrt n;
ite (n - s * s < s) (n - s * s, s) (s, n - s * s - s)
@[simp] theorem mkpair_unpair (n : ℕ) : mkpair (prod.fst (unpair n)) (prod.snd (unpair n)) = n :=
sorry
theorem mkpair_unpair' {n : ℕ} {a : ℕ} {b : ℕ} (H : unpair n = (a, b)) : mkpair a b = n := sorry
@[simp] theorem unpair_mkpair (a : ℕ) (b : ℕ) : unpair (mkpair a b) = (a, b) := sorry
theorem unpair_lt {n : ℕ} (n1 : 1 ≤ n) : prod.fst (unpair n) < n := sorry
theorem unpair_le_left (n : ℕ) : prod.fst (unpair n) ≤ n :=
nat.cases_on n (idRhs (prod.fst (unpair 0) ≤ 0) (of_as_true trivial))
fun (n : ℕ) => idRhs (prod.fst (unpair (n + 1)) ≤ n + 1) (le_of_lt (unpair_lt (succ_pos n)))
theorem le_mkpair_left (a : ℕ) (b : ℕ) : a ≤ mkpair a b := sorry
theorem le_mkpair_right (a : ℕ) (b : ℕ) : b ≤ mkpair a b := sorry
theorem unpair_le_right (n : ℕ) : prod.snd (unpair n) ≤ n := sorry
theorem mkpair_lt_mkpair_left {a₁ : ℕ} {a₂ : ℕ} (b : ℕ) (h : a₁ < a₂) : mkpair a₁ b < mkpair a₂ b :=
sorry
theorem mkpair_lt_mkpair_right (a : ℕ) {b₁ : ℕ} {b₂ : ℕ} (h : b₁ < b₂) :
mkpair a b₁ < mkpair a b₂ :=
sorry
end nat
namespace set
theorem Union_unpair_prod {α : Type u_1} {β : Type u_2} {s : ℕ → set α} {t : ℕ → set β} :
(Union fun (n : ℕ) => set.prod (s (prod.fst (nat.unpair n))) (t (prod.snd (nat.unpair n)))) =
set.prod (Union fun (n : ℕ) => s n) (Union fun (n : ℕ) => t n) :=
sorry
end Mathlib |
0e84edc9302110d48b16ff87c67e5b613a460758 | f083c4ed5d443659f3ed9b43b1ca5bb037ddeb58 | /set_theory/ordinal.lean | 3d15090b3d770bfc039663681c2ac9ee6fccdb74 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | semorrison/mathlib | 1be6f11086e0d24180fec4b9696d3ec58b439d10 | 20b4143976dad48e664c4847b75a85237dca0a89 | refs/heads/master | 1,583,799,212,170 | 1,535,634,130,000 | 1,535,730,505,000 | 129,076,205 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,551,697,998,000 | 1,523,442,265,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 117,113 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Mario Carneiro
Ordinal arithmetic.
Ordinals are defined as equivalences of well-ordered sets by order isomorphism.
-/
import order.order_iso set_theory.cardinal data.sum
noncomputable theory
open function cardinal
local attribute [instance] classical.prop_decidable
universes u v w
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
{r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} {t : γ → γ → Prop}
structure initial_seg {α β : Type*} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) extends r ≼o s :=
(init : ∀ a b, s b (to_order_embedding a) → ∃ a', to_order_embedding a' = b)
local infix ` ≼i `:50 := initial_seg
namespace initial_seg
instance : has_coe (r ≼i s) (r ≼o s) := ⟨initial_seg.to_order_embedding⟩
@[simp] theorem coe_fn_mk (f : r ≼o s) (o) :
(@initial_seg.mk _ _ r s f o : α → β) = f := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_fn_to_order_embedding (f : r ≼i s) : (f.to_order_embedding : α → β) = f := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_coe_fn (f : r ≼i s) : ((f : r ≼o s) : α → β) = f := rfl
theorem init' (f : r ≼i s) {a : α} {b : β} : s b (f a) → ∃ a', f a' = b :=
f.init _ _
theorem init_iff (f : r ≼i s) {a : α} {b : β} : s b (f a) ↔ ∃ a', f a' = b ∧ r a' a :=
⟨λ h, let ⟨a', e⟩ := f.init' h in ⟨a', e, (f : r ≼o s).ord'.2 (e.symm ▸ h)⟩,
λ ⟨a', e, h⟩, e ▸ (f : r ≼o s).ord'.1 h⟩
/-- An order isomorphism is an initial segment -/
def of_iso (f : r ≃o s) : r ≼i s :=
⟨f, λ a b h, ⟨f.symm b, order_iso.apply_inverse_apply f _⟩⟩
@[refl] protected def refl (r : α → α → Prop) : r ≼i r :=
⟨order_embedding.refl _, λ a b h, ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩
@[trans] protected def trans : r ≼i s → s ≼i t → r ≼i t
| ⟨f₁, o₁⟩ ⟨f₂, o₂⟩ := ⟨f₁.trans f₂, λ a c h, begin
simp at h ⊢,
rcases o₂ _ _ h with ⟨b, rfl⟩, have h := f₂.ord'.2 h,
rcases o₁ _ _ h with ⟨a', rfl⟩, exact ⟨a', rfl⟩
end⟩
@[simp] theorem of_iso_apply (f : r ≃o s) (x : α) : of_iso f x = f x := rfl
@[simp] theorem refl_apply (x : α) : initial_seg.refl r x = x := rfl
@[simp] theorem trans_apply : ∀ (f : r ≼i s) (g : s ≼i t) (a : α), (f.trans g) a = g (f a)
| ⟨f₁, o₁⟩ ⟨f₂, o₂⟩ a := order_embedding.trans_apply _ _ _
theorem unique_of_extensional [is_extensional β s] :
well_founded r → subsingleton (r ≼i s) | ⟨h⟩ :=
⟨λ f g, begin
suffices : (f : α → β) = g, { cases f, cases g,
congr, exact order_embedding.eq_of_to_fun_eq this },
funext a, have := h a, induction this with a H IH,
refine @is_extensional.ext _ s _ _ _ (λ x, ⟨λ h, _, λ h, _⟩),
{ rcases f.init_iff.1 h with ⟨y, rfl, h'⟩,
rw IH _ h', exact (g : r ≼o s).ord'.1 h' },
{ rcases g.init_iff.1 h with ⟨y, rfl, h'⟩,
rw ← IH _ h', exact (f : r ≼o s).ord'.1 h' }
end⟩
instance [is_well_order β s] : subsingleton (r ≼i s) :=
⟨λ a, @subsingleton.elim _ (unique_of_extensional
(@order_embedding.well_founded _ _ r s a (is_well_order.wf s))) a⟩
protected theorem eq [is_well_order β s] (f g : r ≼i s) (a) : f a = g a :=
by rw subsingleton.elim f g
theorem antisymm.aux [is_well_order α r] (f : r ≼i s) (g : s ≼i r) : left_inverse g f
| x := begin
have := ((is_well_order.wf r).apply x), induction this with x _ IH,
refine @is_extensional.ext _ r _ _ _ (λ y, _),
simp only [g.init_iff, f.init_iff],
split; intro h,
{ rcases h with ⟨a, rfl, b, rfl, h⟩, rwa IH _ h },
{ exact ⟨f y, IH _ h, y, rfl, h⟩ }
end
def antisymm [is_well_order β s] (f : r ≼i s) (g : s ≼i r) : r ≃o s :=
by haveI := f.to_order_embedding.is_well_order; exact
⟨⟨f, g, antisymm.aux f g, antisymm.aux g f⟩, f.ord⟩
@[simp] theorem antisymm_to_fun [is_well_order β s]
(f : r ≼i s) (g : s ≼i r) : (antisymm f g : α → β) = f := rfl
@[simp] theorem antisymm_symm [is_well_order α r] [is_well_order β s]
(f : r ≼i s) (g : s ≼i r) : (antisymm f g).symm = antisymm g f :=
order_iso.eq_of_to_fun_eq $ by dunfold initial_seg.antisymm; simp
theorem eq_or_principal [is_well_order β s] (f : r ≼i s) : surjective f ∨ ∃ b, ∀ x, s x b ↔ ∃ y, f y = x :=
or_iff_not_imp_right.2 $ λ h b,
acc.rec_on ((is_well_order.wf s).apply b) $ λ x H IH,
not_forall_not.1 $ λ hn,
h ⟨x, λ y, ⟨(IH _), λ ⟨a, e⟩, by rw ← e; exact
(trichotomous _ _).resolve_right
(not_or (hn a) (λ hl, not_exists.2 hn (f.init' hl)))⟩⟩
/-- Restrict the codomain of an initial segment -/
def cod_restrict (p : set β) (f : r ≼i s) (H : ∀ a, f a ∈ p) : r ≼i subrel s p :=
⟨order_embedding.cod_restrict p f H, λ a ⟨b, m⟩ (h : s b (f a)),
let ⟨a', e⟩ := f.init' h in ⟨a', by clear _let_match; subst e; refl⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem cod_restrict_apply (p) (f : r ≼i s) (H a) : cod_restrict p f H a = ⟨f a, H a⟩ := rfl
def le_add (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) : r ≼i sum.lex r s :=
⟨⟨⟨sum.inl, λ _ _, sum.inl.inj⟩, λ a b, by simp⟩,
λ a b, by cases b; simp; exact λ _, ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem le_add_apply (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop)
(a) : le_add r s a = sum.inl a := rfl
end initial_seg
structure principal_seg {α β : Type*} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) extends r ≼o s :=
(top : β)
(down : ∀ b, s b top ↔ ∃ a, to_order_embedding a = b)
local infix ` ≺i `:50 := principal_seg
namespace principal_seg
instance : has_coe (r ≺i s) (r ≼o s) := ⟨principal_seg.to_order_embedding⟩
@[simp] theorem coe_fn_mk (f : r ≼o s) (t o) :
(@principal_seg.mk _ _ r s f t o : α → β) = f := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_fn_to_order_embedding (f : r ≺i s) : (f.to_order_embedding : α → β) = f := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_coe_fn (f : r ≺i s) : ((f : r ≼o s) : α → β) = f := rfl
theorem down' (f : r ≺i s) {b : β} : s b f.top ↔ ∃ a, f a = b :=
f.down _
theorem lt_top (f : r ≺i s) (a : α) : s (f a) f.top :=
f.down'.2 ⟨_, rfl⟩
theorem init [is_trans β s] (f : r ≺i s) {a : α} {b : β} (h : s b (f a)) : ∃ a', f a' = b :=
f.down'.1 $ trans h $ f.lt_top _
instance has_coe_initial_seg [is_trans β s] : has_coe (r ≺i s) (r ≼i s) :=
⟨λ f, ⟨f.to_order_embedding, λ a b, f.init⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem coe_coe_fn' [is_trans β s] (f : r ≺i s) : ((f : r ≼i s) : α → β) = f := rfl
theorem init_iff [is_trans β s] (f : r ≺i s) {a : α} {b : β} : s b (f a) ↔ ∃ a', f a' = b ∧ r a' a :=
initial_seg.init_iff f
theorem irrefl (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] (f : r ≺i r) : false :=
begin
have := f.lt_top f.top,
rw [show f f.top = f.top, from
initial_seg.eq ↑f (initial_seg.refl r) f.top] at this,
exact irrefl _ this
end
def lt_le [is_trans β s] (f : r ≺i s) (g : s ≼i t) : r ≺i t :=
⟨@order_embedding.trans _ _ _ r s t f g, g f.top, λ a,
by simp [g.init_iff, f.down', exists_and_distrib_left.symm,
-exists_and_distrib_left, exists_swap]; refl⟩
@[simp] theorem lt_le_apply [is_trans β s] [is_trans γ t] (f : r ≺i s) (g : s ≼i t) (a : α) : (f.lt_le g) a = g (f a) :=
order_embedding.trans_apply _ _ _
@[simp] theorem lt_le_top [is_trans β s] [is_trans γ t] (f : r ≺i s) (g : s ≼i t) : (f.lt_le g).top = g f.top := rfl
@[trans] protected def trans [is_trans β s] [is_trans γ t] (f : r ≺i s) (g : s ≺i t) : r ≺i t :=
lt_le f g
@[simp] theorem trans_apply [is_trans β s] [is_trans γ t] (f : r ≺i s) (g : s ≺i t) (a : α) : (f.trans g) a = g (f a) :=
lt_le_apply _ _ _
@[simp] theorem trans_top [is_trans β s] [is_trans γ t] (f : r ≺i s) (g : s ≺i t) : (f.trans g).top = g f.top := rfl
def equiv_lt [is_trans β s] [is_trans γ t] (f : r ≃o s) (g : s ≺i t) : r ≺i t :=
⟨@order_embedding.trans _ _ _ r s t f g, g.top, λ c,
by simp [g.down']; exact
⟨λ ⟨b, h⟩, ⟨f.symm b, by simp [h]⟩, λ ⟨a, h⟩, ⟨f a, h⟩⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem equiv_lt_apply [is_trans β s] [is_trans γ t] (f : r ≃o s) (g : s ≺i t) (a : α) : (equiv_lt f g) a = g (f a) :=
by delta equiv_lt; simp
@[simp] theorem equiv_lt_top [is_trans β s] [is_trans γ t] (f : r ≃o s) (g : s ≺i t) : (equiv_lt f g).top = g.top := rfl
instance [is_well_order β s] : subsingleton (r ≺i s) :=
⟨λ f g, begin
have ef : (f : α → β) = g,
{ show ((f : r ≼i s) : α → β) = g,
rw @subsingleton.elim _ _ (f : r ≼i s) g, refl },
have et : f.top = g.top,
{ refine @is_extensional.ext _ s _ _ _ (λ x, _),
simp [f.down, g.down, ef] },
cases f, cases g, simp at ef et,
have := order_embedding.eq_of_to_fun_eq ef; congr'
end⟩
theorem top_eq [is_well_order β s] [is_well_order γ t]
(e : r ≃o s) (f : r ≺i t) (g : s ≺i t) : f.top = g.top :=
by rw subsingleton.elim f (principal_seg.equiv_lt e g); simp
/-- Any element of a well order yields a principal segment -/
def of_element {α : Type*} (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] (a : α) :
subrel r {b | r b a} ≺i r :=
⟨subrel.order_embedding _ _, a, λ b,
⟨λ h, ⟨⟨_, h⟩, rfl⟩, λ ⟨⟨_, h⟩, rfl⟩, h⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem of_element_apply {α : Type*} (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] (a : α) (b) :
of_element r a b = b.1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem of_element_top {α : Type*} (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] (a : α) :
(of_element r a).top = a := rfl
/-- Restrict the codomain of a principal segment -/
def cod_restrict (p : set β) (f : r ≺i s)
(H : ∀ a, f a ∈ p) (H₂ : f.top ∈ p) : r ≺i subrel s p :=
⟨order_embedding.cod_restrict p f H, ⟨f.top, H₂⟩, λ ⟨b, h⟩,
f.down'.trans $ exists_congr $ λ a,
show (⟨f a, H a⟩ : p).1 = _ ↔ _, from ⟨subtype.eq, congr_arg _⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem cod_restrict_apply (p) (f : r ≺i s) (H H₂ a) : cod_restrict p f H H₂ a = ⟨f a, H a⟩ := rfl
@[simp] theorem cod_restrict_top (p) (f : r ≺i s) (H H₂) : (cod_restrict p f H H₂).top = ⟨f.top, H₂⟩ := rfl
end principal_seg
def initial_seg.lt_or_eq [is_well_order β s] (f : r ≼i s) : r ≺i s ⊕ r ≃o s :=
if h : surjective f then sum.inr (order_iso.of_surjective f h) else
have h' : _, from (initial_seg.eq_or_principal f).resolve_left h,
sum.inl ⟨f, classical.some h', classical.some_spec h'⟩
@[simp] theorem initial_seg.lt_or_eq_apply_left [is_well_order β s]
(f : r ≼i s) {g} (h : f.lt_or_eq = sum.inl g) (a : α) : g a = f a :=
begin
unfold initial_seg.lt_or_eq at h,
by_cases sj : surjective f; simp [sj] at h,
{cases h}, {subst h, refl}
end
@[simp] theorem initial_seg.lt_or_eq_apply_right [is_well_order β s]
(f : r ≼i s) {g} (h : f.lt_or_eq = sum.inr g) (a : α) : g a = f a :=
begin
unfold initial_seg.lt_or_eq at h,
by_cases sj : surjective f; simp [sj] at h,
{subst g, simp}, {cases h}
end
def initial_seg.le_lt [is_well_order β s] [is_trans γ t] (f : r ≼i s) (g : s ≺i t) : r ≺i t :=
match f.lt_or_eq with
| sum.inl f' := f'.trans g
| sum.inr f' := principal_seg.equiv_lt f' g
end
@[simp] theorem initial_seg.le_lt_apply [is_well_order β s] [is_trans γ t]
(f : r ≼i s) (g : s ≺i t) (a : α) : (f.le_lt g) a = g (f a) :=
begin
delta initial_seg.le_lt, cases h : f.lt_or_eq with f' f',
{ simp [f.lt_or_eq_apply_left h] },
{ simp [f.lt_or_eq_apply_right h] }
end
namespace order_embedding
def collapse_F [is_well_order β s] (f : r ≼o s) : Π a, {b // ¬ s (f a) b} :=
(order_embedding.well_founded f $ is_well_order.wf s).fix $ λ a IH, begin
let S := {b | ∀ a h, s (IH a h).1 b},
have : f a ∈ S, from λ a' h, ((trichotomous _ _)
.resolve_left $ λ h', (IH a' h).2 $ trans (f.ord'.1 h) h')
.resolve_left $ λ h', (IH a' h).2 $ h' ▸ f.ord'.1 h,
exact ⟨(is_well_order.wf s).min S (set.ne_empty_of_mem this),
(is_well_order.wf s).not_lt_min _ _ this⟩
end
theorem collapse_F.lt [is_well_order β s] (f : r ≼o s) {a : α}
: ∀ {a'}, r a' a → s (collapse_F f a').1 (collapse_F f a).1 :=
show (collapse_F f a).1 ∈ {b | ∀ a' (h : r a' a), s (collapse_F f a').1 b}, begin
unfold collapse_F, rw well_founded.fix_eq,
apply well_founded.min_mem _ _
end
theorem collapse_F.not_lt [is_well_order β s] (f : r ≼o s) (a : α)
{b} (h : ∀ a' (h : r a' a), s (collapse_F f a').1 b) : ¬ s b (collapse_F f a).1 :=
begin
unfold collapse_F, rw well_founded.fix_eq,
exact well_founded.not_lt_min _ _ _
(show b ∈ {b | ∀ a' (h : r a' a), s (collapse_F f a').1 b}, from h)
end
/-- Construct an initial segment from an order embedding. -/
def collapse [is_well_order β s] (f : r ≼o s) : r ≼i s :=
by haveI := order_embedding.is_well_order f; exact
⟨order_embedding.of_monotone
(λ a, (collapse_F f a).1) (λ a b, collapse_F.lt f),
λ a b, by revert a; dsimp; exact
acc.rec_on ((is_well_order.wf s).apply b) (λ b H IH a h, begin
let S := {a | ¬ s (collapse_F f a).1 b},
have : S ≠ ∅ := set.ne_empty_of_mem (asymm h),
existsi (is_well_order.wf r).min S this,
refine ((@trichotomous _ s _ _ _).resolve_left _).resolve_right _,
{ exact (is_well_order.wf r).min_mem S this },
{ refine collapse_F.not_lt f _ (λ a' h', _),
by_contradiction hn,
exact (is_well_order.wf r).not_lt_min S this hn h' }
end)⟩
theorem collapse_apply [is_well_order β s] (f : r ≼o s)
(a) : collapse f a = (collapse_F f a).1 := rfl
end order_embedding
section well_ordering_thm
parameter {σ : Type*}
private def partial_wo := Σ p : set σ, {r // is_well_order p r}
private def partial_wo.le (x y : partial_wo) := ∃ f : x.2.1 ≼i y.2.1, ∀ x, (f x).1 = x.1
local infix ` ≤ `:50 := partial_wo.le
private def partial_wo.is_refl : is_refl _ (≤) :=
⟨λ a, ⟨initial_seg.refl _, λ x, rfl⟩⟩
local attribute [instance] partial_wo.is_refl
private def partial_wo.trans {a b c} : a ≤ b → b ≤ c → a ≤ c
| ⟨f, hf⟩ ⟨g, hg⟩ := ⟨f.trans g, λ a, by simp [hf, hg]⟩
private def sub_of_le {s t} : s ≤ t → s.1 ⊆ t.1
| ⟨f, hf⟩ x h := by have := (f ⟨x, h⟩).2; rwa [hf ⟨x, h⟩] at this
private def agree_of_le {s t} : s ≤ t → ∀ {a b} sa sb ta tb,
s.2.1 ⟨a, sa⟩ ⟨b, sb⟩ ↔ t.2.1 ⟨a, ta⟩ ⟨b, tb⟩
| ⟨f, hf⟩ a b sa sb ta tb := by rw [f.to_order_embedding.ord',
show f.to_order_embedding ⟨a, sa⟩ = ⟨a, ta⟩, from subtype.eq (hf ⟨a, sa⟩),
show f.to_order_embedding ⟨b, sb⟩ = ⟨b, tb⟩, from subtype.eq (hf ⟨b, sb⟩)]
section
parameters {c : set partial_wo} (hc : zorn.chain (≤) c)
private def U := ⋃₀ ((λ x:partial_wo, x.1) '' c)
private def R (x y : U) := ∃ a : partial_wo, a ∈ c ∧
∃ (hx : x.1 ∈ a.1) (hy : y.1 ∈ a.1), a.2.1 ⟨_, hx⟩ ⟨_, hy⟩
private lemma mem_U {a} : a ∈ U ↔ ∃ s : partial_wo, s ∈ c ∧ a ∈ s.1 :=
by unfold U; simp [-sigma.exists]
private lemma mem_U2 {a b} (au : a ∈ U) (bu : b ∈ U) :
∃ s : partial_wo, s ∈ c ∧ a ∈ s.1 ∧ b ∈ s.1 :=
let ⟨s, sc, as⟩ := mem_U.1 au, ⟨t, tc, bt⟩ := mem_U.1 bu,
⟨k, kc, ks, kt⟩ := hc.directed sc tc in
⟨k, kc, sub_of_le ks as, sub_of_le kt bt⟩
private lemma R_ex {s : partial_wo} (sc : s ∈ c)
{a b : σ} (hb : b ∈ s.1) {au bu} :
R ⟨a, au⟩ ⟨b, bu⟩ → ∃ ha, s.2.1 ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
| ⟨t, tc, at', bt, h⟩ :=
match hc.total_of_refl sc tc with
| or.inr hr := ⟨sub_of_le hr at', (agree_of_le hr _ _ _ _).1 h⟩
| or.inl hr@⟨f, hf⟩ := begin
rw [← show (f ⟨b, hb⟩) = ⟨(subtype.mk b bu).val, bt⟩, from
subtype.eq (hf _)] at h,
rcases f.init_iff.1 h with ⟨⟨a', ha⟩, e, h'⟩,
have : a' = a,
{ have := congr_arg subtype.val e, rwa hf at this },
subst a', exact ⟨_, h'⟩
end
end
private lemma R_iff {s : partial_wo} (sc : s ∈ c)
{a b : σ} (ha hb) {au bu} :
R ⟨a, au⟩ ⟨b, bu⟩ ↔ s.2.1 ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩ :=
⟨λ h, let ⟨_, h⟩ := R_ex sc hb h in h,
λ h, ⟨s, sc, ha, hb, h⟩⟩
private theorem wo : is_well_order U R :=
{ trichotomous := λ ⟨a, au⟩ ⟨b, bu⟩,
let ⟨s, sc, ha, hb⟩ := mem_U2 au bu in
by haveI := s.2.2; exact
(@trichotomous _ s.2.1 _ ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩).imp
(R_iff hc sc _ _).2
(λ o, o.imp (λ h, by congr; injection h)
(R_iff hc sc _ _).2),
irrefl := λ ⟨a, au⟩ h, let ⟨s, sc, ha⟩ := mem_U.1 au in
by haveI := s.2.2; exact irrefl _ ((R_iff hc sc _ ha).1 h),
trans := λ ⟨a, au⟩ ⟨b, bu⟩ ⟨d, du⟩ ab bd,
let ⟨s, sc, as, bs⟩ := mem_U2 au bu, ⟨t, tc, dt⟩ := mem_U.1 du,
⟨k, kc, ks, kt⟩ := hc.directed sc tc in begin
simp only [R_iff hc kc, sub_of_le ks as, sub_of_le ks bs, sub_of_le kt dt] at ab bd ⊢,
haveI := k.2.2, exact trans ab bd
end,
wf := ⟨λ ⟨a, au⟩, let ⟨s, sc, ha⟩ := mem_U.1 au in
suffices ∀ (a : s.1) au, acc R ⟨a.1, au⟩, from this ⟨a, ha⟩ au,
λ a, acc.rec_on ((@is_well_order.wf _ _ s.2.2).apply a) $
λ ⟨a, ha⟩ H IH au, ⟨_, λ ⟨b, hb⟩ h,
let ⟨hb, h⟩ := R_ex sc ha h in IH ⟨b, hb⟩ h _⟩⟩ }
theorem chain_ub : ∃ ub, ∀ a ∈ c, a ≤ ub :=
⟨⟨U, R, wo⟩, λ s sc, ⟨⟨⟨⟨
λ a, ⟨a.1, mem_U.2 ⟨s, sc, a.2⟩⟩,
λ a b h, by injection h with h; exact subtype.eq h⟩,
λ a b, by cases a with a ha; cases b with b hb; exact
(R_iff hc sc _ _).symm⟩,
λ ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩ h,
let ⟨bs, h'⟩ := R_ex sc ha h in ⟨⟨_, bs⟩, rfl⟩⟩,
λ a, rfl⟩⟩
end
theorem well_ordering_thm : ∃ r, is_well_order σ r :=
let ⟨m, MM⟩ := zorn.zorn (λ c, chain_ub) (λ a b c, partial_wo.trans) in
by haveI := m.2.2; exact
suffices hf : ∀ a, a ∈ m.1, from
let f : σ ≃ m.1 := ⟨λ a, ⟨a, hf a⟩, λ a, a.1, λ a, rfl, λ ⟨a, ha⟩, rfl⟩ in
⟨order.preimage f m.2.1,
@order_embedding.is_well_order _ _ _ _ ↑(order_iso.preimage f m.2.1) m.2.2⟩,
λ a, classical.by_contradiction $ λ ha,
let f : (insert a m.1 : set σ) ≃ (m.1 ⊕ unit) :=
⟨λ x, if h : x.1 ∈ m.1 then sum.inl ⟨_, h⟩ else sum.inr ⟨⟩,
λ x, sum.cases_on x (λ x, ⟨x.1, or.inr x.2⟩) (λ _, ⟨a, or.inl rfl⟩),
λ x, match x with
| ⟨_, or.inl rfl⟩ := by dsimp; rw [dif_neg ha]
| ⟨x, or.inr h⟩ := by dsimp; rw [dif_pos h]
end,
λ x, by rcases x with ⟨x, h⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩; dsimp;
[rw [dif_pos h], rw [dif_neg ha]]⟩ in
let r' := sum.lex m.2.1 (@empty_relation unit) in
have r'wo : is_well_order _ r' := @sum.lex.is_well_order _ _ _ _ m.2.2 _,
let m' : partial_wo := ⟨insert a m.1, order.preimage f r',
@order_embedding.is_well_order _ _ _ _ ↑(order_iso.preimage f r') r'wo⟩ in
let g : m.2.1 ≼i r' := ⟨⟨⟨sum.inl, λ a b, sum.inl.inj⟩,
λ a b, by simp [r']⟩,
λ a b h, begin
rcases b with b | ⟨⟨⟩⟩; simp [r'] at h ⊢,
{ cases b, exact ⟨_, _, rfl⟩ },
{ contradiction }
end⟩ in
ha (sub_of_le (MM m' ⟨g.trans
(initial_seg.of_iso (order_iso.preimage f r').symm),
λ x, rfl⟩) (or.inl rfl))
end well_ordering_thm
structure Well_order : Type (u+1) :=
(α : Type u)
(r : α → α → Prop)
(wo : is_well_order α r)
instance ordinal.is_equivalent : setoid Well_order :=
{ r := λ ⟨α, r, wo⟩ ⟨β, s, wo'⟩, nonempty (r ≃o s),
iseqv := ⟨λ⟨α, r, _⟩, ⟨order_iso.refl _⟩,
λ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨e⟩, ⟨e.symm⟩,
λ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩, ⟨e₁.trans e₂⟩⟩ }
/-- `ordinal.{u}` is the type of well orders in `Type u`,
quotient by order isomorphism. -/
def ordinal : Type (u + 1) := quotient ordinal.is_equivalent
namespace ordinal
/-- The order type of a well order is an ordinal. -/
def type (r : α → α → Prop) [wo : is_well_order α r] : ordinal :=
⟦⟨α, r, wo⟩⟧
/-- The order type of an element inside a well order. -/
def typein (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] (a : α) : ordinal :=
type (subrel r {b | r b a})
theorem type_def (r : α → α → Prop) [wo : is_well_order α r] :
@eq ordinal ⟦⟨α, r, wo⟩⟧ (type r) := rfl
@[simp] theorem type_def' (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] {wo} :
@eq ordinal ⟦⟨α, r, wo⟩⟧ (type r) := rfl
theorem type_eq {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[is_well_order α r] [is_well_order β s] :
type r = type s ↔ nonempty (r ≃o s) := quotient.eq
@[elab_as_eliminator] theorem induction_on {C : ordinal → Prop}
(o : ordinal) (H : ∀ α r [is_well_order α r], C (type r)) : C o :=
quot.induction_on o $ λ ⟨α, r, wo⟩, @H α r wo
/-- Ordinal less-equal is defined such that
well orders `r` and `s` satisfy `type r ≤ type s` if there exists
a function embedding `r` as an initial segment of `s`. -/
protected def le (a b : ordinal) : Prop :=
quotient.lift_on₂ a b (λ ⟨α, r, wo⟩ ⟨β, s, wo'⟩, nonempty (r ≼i s)) $
λ ⟨α₁, r₁, o₁⟩ ⟨α₂, r₂, o₂⟩ ⟨β₁, s₁, p₁⟩ ⟨β₂, s₂, p₂⟩ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩,
propext ⟨
λ ⟨h⟩, ⟨(initial_seg.of_iso f.symm).trans $
h.trans (initial_seg.of_iso g)⟩,
λ ⟨h⟩, ⟨(initial_seg.of_iso f).trans $
h.trans (initial_seg.of_iso g.symm)⟩⟩
instance : has_le ordinal := ⟨ordinal.le⟩
theorem type_le {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[is_well_order α r] [is_well_order β s] :
type r ≤ type s ↔ nonempty (r ≼i s) := iff.rfl
/-- Ordinal less-than is defined such that
well orders `r` and `s` satisfy `type r < type s` if there exists
a function embedding `r` as a principal segment of `s`. -/
def lt (a b : ordinal) : Prop :=
quotient.lift_on₂ a b (λ ⟨α, r, wo⟩ ⟨β, s, wo'⟩, nonempty (r ≺i s)) $
λ ⟨α₁, r₁, o₁⟩ ⟨α₂, r₂, o₂⟩ ⟨β₁, s₁, p₁⟩ ⟨β₂, s₂, p₂⟩ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩,
by exactI propext ⟨
λ ⟨h⟩, ⟨principal_seg.equiv_lt f.symm $
h.lt_le (initial_seg.of_iso g)⟩,
λ ⟨h⟩, ⟨principal_seg.equiv_lt f $
h.lt_le (initial_seg.of_iso g.symm)⟩⟩
instance : has_lt ordinal := ⟨ordinal.lt⟩
@[simp] theorem type_lt {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[is_well_order α r] [is_well_order β s] :
type r < type s ↔ nonempty (r ≺i s) := iff.rfl
instance : partial_order ordinal :=
{ le := (≤),
lt := (<),
le_refl := quot.ind $ by exact λ ⟨α, r, wo⟩, ⟨initial_seg.refl _⟩,
le_trans := λ a b c, quotient.induction_on₃ a b c $
λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩, ⟨f.trans g⟩,
lt_iff_le_not_le := λ a b, quotient.induction_on₂ a b $
λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩, by exactI
⟨λ ⟨f⟩, ⟨⟨f⟩, λ ⟨g⟩, (f.lt_le g).irrefl _⟩,
λ ⟨⟨f⟩, h⟩, sum.rec_on f.lt_or_eq (λ g, ⟨g⟩)
(λ g, (h ⟨initial_seg.of_iso g.symm⟩).elim)⟩,
le_antisymm := λ x b, show x ≤ b → b ≤ x → x = b, from
quotient.induction_on₂ x b $ λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨h₁⟩ ⟨h₂⟩,
by exactI quot.sound ⟨initial_seg.antisymm h₁ h₂⟩ }
theorem typein_lt_type (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r]
(a : α) : typein r a < type r :=
⟨principal_seg.of_element _ _⟩
@[simp] theorem typein_top {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[is_well_order α r] [is_well_order β s] (f : r ≺i s) :
typein s f.top = type r :=
eq.symm $ quot.sound ⟨order_iso.of_surjective
(order_embedding.cod_restrict _ f f.lt_top)
(λ ⟨a, h⟩, by rcases f.down'.1 h with ⟨b, rfl⟩; exact ⟨b, rfl⟩)⟩
@[simp] theorem typein_apply {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[is_well_order α r] [is_well_order β s] (f : r ≼i s) (a : α) :
ordinal.typein s (f a) = ordinal.typein r a :=
eq.symm $ quotient.sound ⟨order_iso.of_surjective
(order_embedding.cod_restrict _
((subrel.order_embedding _ _).trans f)
(λ ⟨x, h⟩, by simpa using f.to_order_embedding.ord'.1 h))
(λ ⟨y, h⟩, by rcases f.init' h with ⟨a, rfl⟩;
exact ⟨⟨a, f.to_order_embedding.ord'.2 h⟩, by simp⟩)⟩
@[simp] theorem typein_lt_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r]
{a b : α} : typein r a < typein r b ↔ r a b :=
⟨λ ⟨f⟩, begin
have : f.top.1 = a,
{ let f' := principal_seg.of_element r a,
let g' := f.trans (principal_seg.of_element r b),
have : g'.top = f'.top, {rw subsingleton.elim f' g'},
simpa [f', g'] },
rw ← this, exact f.top.2
end, λ h, ⟨principal_seg.cod_restrict _
(principal_seg.of_element r a)
(λ x, @trans _ r _ _ _ _ x.2 h) h⟩⟩
theorem typein_surj (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r]
{o} (h : o < type r) : ∃ a, typein r a = o :=
induction_on o (λ β s _ ⟨f⟩, by exactI ⟨f.top, by simp⟩) h
theorem typein_inj (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r]
{a b} : typein r a = typein r b ↔ a = b :=
⟨λ h, ((@trichotomous _ r _ a b)
.resolve_left (λ hn, ne_of_lt ((typein_lt_typein r).2 hn) h))
.resolve_right (λ hn, ne_of_gt ((typein_lt_typein r).2 hn) h),
congr_arg _⟩
/-- `enum r o h` is the `o`-th element of `α` ordered by `r`.
That is, `enum` maps an initial segment of the ordinals, those
less than the order type of `r`, to the elements of `α`. -/
def enum (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] (o) : o < type r → α :=
quot.rec_on o (λ ⟨β, s, _⟩ h, (classical.choice h).top) $
λ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨h⟩, begin
resetI, refine funext (λ (H₂ : type t < type r), _),
have H₁ : type s < type r, {rwa type_eq.2 ⟨h⟩},
have : ∀ {o e} (H : o < type r), @@eq.rec
(λ (o : ordinal), o < type r → α)
(λ (h : type s < type r), (classical.choice h).top)
e H = (classical.choice H₁).top, {intros, subst e},
exact (this H₂).trans (principal_seg.top_eq h
(classical.choice H₁) (classical.choice H₂))
end
theorem enum_type {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[is_well_order α r] [is_well_order β s] (f : s ≺i r)
{h : type s < type r} : enum r (type s) h = f.top :=
principal_seg.top_eq (order_iso.refl _) _ _
@[simp] theorem enum_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] (a : α)
{h : typein r a < type r} : enum r (typein r a) h = a :=
by simp [typein, enum_type (principal_seg.of_element r a)]
@[simp] theorem typein_enum (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r]
{o} (h : o < type r) : typein r (enum r o h) = o :=
let ⟨a, e⟩ := typein_surj r h in
by clear _let_match; subst e; simp
theorem enum_lt {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} {t : γ → γ → Prop}
[is_well_order α r] [is_well_order β s] [is_well_order γ t]
(h₁ : type s < type r) (h₂ : type t < type r) :
r (enum r (type s) h₁) (enum r
(type t) h₂) ↔ type s < type t :=
by rw [← typein_lt_typein r, typein_enum, typein_enum]
theorem wf : @well_founded ordinal (<) :=
⟨λ a, induction_on a $ λ α r wo, by exactI
suffices ∀ a, acc (<) (typein r a), from
⟨_, λ o h, let ⟨a, e⟩ := typein_surj r h in e ▸ this a⟩,
λ a, acc.rec_on (wo.wf.apply a) $ λ x H IH, ⟨_, λ o h, begin
rcases typein_surj r (lt_trans h (typein_lt_type r _)) with ⟨b, rfl⟩,
exact IH _ ((typein_lt_typein r).1 h)
end⟩⟩
instance : has_well_founded ordinal := ⟨(<), wf⟩
/-- The cardinal of an ordinal is the cardinal of any
set with that order type. -/
def card (o : ordinal) : cardinal :=
quot.lift_on o (λ ⟨α, r, _⟩, mk α) $
λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨e⟩, quotient.sound ⟨e.to_equiv⟩
@[simp] theorem card_type (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] :
card (type r) = mk α := rfl
theorem card_le_card {o₁ o₂ : ordinal} : o₁ ≤ o₂ → card o₁ ≤ card o₂ :=
induction_on o₁ $ λ α r _, induction_on o₂ $ λ β s _ ⟨⟨⟨f, _⟩, _⟩⟩, ⟨f⟩
instance : has_zero ordinal :=
⟨⟦⟨ulift empty, empty_relation, by apply_instance⟩⟧⟩
theorem zero_eq_type_empty : 0 = @type empty empty_relation _ :=
quotient.sound ⟨⟨equiv.ulift, λ _ _, iff.rfl⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem card_zero : card 0 = 0 := rfl
theorem zero_le (o : ordinal) : 0 ≤ o :=
induction_on o $ λ α r _,
⟨⟨⟨embedding.of_not_nonempty $ λ ⟨⟨a⟩⟩, a.elim,
λ ⟨a⟩, a.elim⟩, λ ⟨a⟩, a.elim⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem le_zero {o : ordinal} : o ≤ 0 ↔ o = 0 :=
by simp [le_antisymm_iff, zero_le]
theorem pos_iff_ne_zero {o : ordinal} : 0 < o ↔ o ≠ 0 :=
by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm, zero_le]
instance : has_one ordinal :=
⟨⟦⟨ulift unit, empty_relation, by apply_instance⟩⟧⟩
theorem one_eq_type_unit : 1 = @type unit empty_relation _ :=
quotient.sound ⟨⟨equiv.ulift, λ _ _, iff.rfl⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem card_one : card 1 = 1 := rfl
instance : has_add ordinal.{u} :=
⟨λo₁ o₂, quotient.lift_on₂ o₁ o₂
(λ ⟨α, r, wo⟩ ⟨β, s, wo'⟩, ⟦⟨α ⊕ β, sum.lex r s, by exactI sum.lex.is_well_order⟩⟧
: Well_order → Well_order → ordinal) $
λ ⟨α₁, r₁, o₁⟩ ⟨α₂, r₂, o₂⟩ ⟨β₁, s₁, p₁⟩ ⟨β₂, s₂, p₂⟩ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩,
quot.sound ⟨order_iso.sum_lex_congr f g⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem type_add {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop)
[is_well_order α r] [is_well_order β s] : type r + type s = type (sum.lex r s) := rfl
/-- The ordinal successor is the smallest ordinal larger than `o`.
It is defined as `o + 1`. -/
def succ (o : ordinal) : ordinal := o + 1
theorem succ_eq_add_one (o) : succ o = o + 1 := rfl
theorem lt_succ_self (o : ordinal.{u}) : o < succ o :=
induction_on o $ λ α r _,
⟨begin
resetI, cases e : initial_seg.lt_or_eq
(@initial_seg.le_add α (ulift.{u 0} unit) r empty_relation) with f f,
{ exact f },
{ have := (initial_seg.of_iso f).eq (initial_seg.le_add _ _) (f.symm (sum.inr ⟨()⟩)),
simp at this, cases this }
end⟩
theorem succ_pos (o : ordinal) : 0 < succ o :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le _) (lt_succ_self _)
theorem succ_ne_zero (o : ordinal) : succ o ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt $ succ_pos o
theorem succ_le {a b : ordinal} : succ a ≤ b ↔ a < b :=
⟨lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_succ_self _),
induction_on a $ λ α r _, induction_on b $ λ β s _ ⟨⟨f, t, hf⟩⟩, begin
resetI,
refine ⟨⟨order_embedding.of_monotone (sum.rec _ _) (λ a b, _), λ a b, _⟩⟩,
{ exact f }, { exact λ _, t },
{ rcases a with a|⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩; rcases b with b|⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩,
{ simpa using f.ord'.1 },
{ simpa using (hf _).2 ⟨_, rfl⟩ },
{ simp },
{ simpa using false.elim } },
{ rcases a with a|⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩,
{ intro h, have := principal_seg.init ⟨f, t, hf⟩ h,
simp at this, simp [this] },
{ simp [(hf _).symm] {contextual := tt} } }
end⟩
@[simp] theorem card_add (o₁ o₂ : ordinal) : card (o₁ + o₂) = card o₁ + card o₂ :=
induction_on o₁ $ λ α r _, induction_on o₂ $ λ β s _, rfl
@[simp] theorem card_succ (o : ordinal) : card (succ o) = card o + 1 :=
by simp [succ]
@[simp] theorem card_nat (n : ℕ) : card.{u} n = n :=
by induction n; simp *
theorem nat_cast_succ (n : ℕ) : (succ n : ordinal) = n.succ := rfl
instance : add_monoid ordinal.{u} :=
{ add := (+),
zero := 0,
zero_add := λ o, induction_on o $ λ α r _, eq.symm $ quot.sound
⟨⟨(equiv.symm $ (equiv.ulift.sum_congr (equiv.refl _)).trans (equiv.empty_sum _)),
λ a b, show r a b ↔ sum.lex _ _ (sum.inr a) (sum.inr b), by simp⟩⟩,
add_zero := λ o, induction_on o $ λ α r _, eq.symm $ quot.sound
⟨⟨(equiv.symm $ ((equiv.refl _).sum_congr equiv.ulift).trans (equiv.sum_empty _)),
λ a b, show r a b ↔ sum.lex _ _ (sum.inl a) (sum.inl b), by simp⟩⟩,
add_assoc := λ o₁ o₂ o₃, quotient.induction_on₃ o₁ o₂ o₃ $
λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩, quot.sound
⟨⟨equiv.sum_assoc _ _ _, λ a b,
by rcases a with ⟨a|a⟩|a; rcases b with ⟨b|b⟩|b; simp⟩⟩ }
theorem add_succ (o₁ o₂ : ordinal) : o₁ + succ o₂ = succ (o₁ + o₂) :=
(add_assoc _ _ _).symm
@[simp] theorem succ_zero : succ 0 = 1 := zero_add _
theorem one_le_iff_pos {o : ordinal} : 1 ≤ o ↔ 0 < o :=
by rw [← succ_zero, succ_le]
theorem one_le_iff_ne_zero {o : ordinal} : 1 ≤ o ↔ o ≠ 0 :=
by rw [one_le_iff_pos, pos_iff_ne_zero]
theorem add_le_add_left {a b : ordinal} : a ≤ b → ∀ c, c + a ≤ c + b :=
induction_on a $ λ α₁ r₁ _, induction_on b $ λ α₂ r₂ _ ⟨⟨⟨f, fo⟩, fi⟩⟩ c,
induction_on c $ λ β s _,
⟨⟨⟨(embedding.refl _).sum_congr f,
λ a b, by cases a with a a; cases b with b b; simp [fo]⟩,
λ a b, begin
cases b with b b, { simp [(⟨_, rfl⟩ : ∃ a, a=b)] },
cases a with a a; simp, exact fi _ _,
end⟩⟩
theorem le_add_right (a b : ordinal) : a ≤ a + b :=
by simpa using add_le_add_left (zero_le b) a
theorem add_le_add_iff_left (a) {b c : ordinal} : a + b ≤ a + c ↔ b ≤ c :=
⟨induction_on a $ λ α r _, induction_on b $ λ β₁ s₁ _, induction_on c $ λ β₂ s₂ _ ⟨f⟩, ⟨
by exactI
have fl : ∀ a, f (sum.inl a) = sum.inl a := λ a,
by simpa using initial_seg.eq ((initial_seg.le_add r s₁).trans f) (initial_seg.le_add r s₂) a,
have ∀ b, {b' // f (sum.inr b) = sum.inr b'}, begin
intro b, cases e : f (sum.inr b),
{ rw ← fl at e, have := f.inj e, contradiction },
{ exact ⟨_, rfl⟩ }
end,
let g (b) := (this b).1 in
have fr : ∀ b, f (sum.inr b) = sum.inr (g b), from λ b, (this b).2,
⟨⟨⟨g, λ x y h, by injection f.inj
(by rw [fr, fr, h] : f (sum.inr x) = f (sum.inr y))⟩,
λ a b, by simpa [fr] using @order_embedding.ord _ _ _ _
f.to_order_embedding (sum.inr a) (sum.inr b)⟩,
λ a b, begin
have nex : ¬ ∃ (a : α), f (sum.inl a) = sum.inr b :=
λ ⟨a, e⟩, by rw [fl] at e; injection e,
simpa [fr, nex] using f.init (sum.inr a) (sum.inr b),
end⟩⟩,
λ h, add_le_add_left h _⟩
theorem add_left_cancel (a) {b c : ordinal} : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c :=
by simp [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_left]
/-- The universe lift operation for ordinals, which embeds `ordinal.{u}` as
a proper initial segment of `ordinal.{v}` for `v > u`. -/
def lift (o : ordinal.{u}) : ordinal.{max u v} :=
quotient.lift_on o (λ ⟨α, r, wo⟩,
@type _ _ (@order_embedding.is_well_order _ _ (@equiv.ulift.{u v} α ⁻¹'o r) r
(order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift.{u v} r) wo)) $
λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨f⟩,
quot.sound ⟨(order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift r).trans $
f.trans (order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift s).symm⟩
theorem lift_type {α} (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] :
∃ wo', lift (type r) = @type _ (@equiv.ulift.{u v} α ⁻¹'o r) wo' :=
⟨_, rfl⟩
theorem lift_umax : lift.{u (max u v)} = lift.{u v} :=
funext $ λ a, induction_on a $ λ α r _,
quotient.sound ⟨(order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift r).trans (order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift r).symm⟩
theorem lift_id' (a : ordinal) : lift a = a :=
induction_on a $ λ α r _,
quotient.sound ⟨order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift r⟩
@[simp] theorem lift_id : ∀ a, lift.{u u} a = a := lift_id'.{u u}
@[simp] theorem lift_lift (a : ordinal) : lift.{(max u v) w} (lift.{u v} a) = lift.{u (max v w)} a :=
induction_on a $ λ α r _,
quotient.sound ⟨(order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift _).trans $
(order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift _).trans (order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift _).symm⟩
theorem lift_type_le {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r s} [is_well_order α r] [is_well_order β s] :
lift.{u (max v w)} (type r) ≤ lift.{v (max u w)} (type s) ↔ nonempty (r ≼i s) :=
⟨λ ⟨f⟩, ⟨(initial_seg.of_iso (order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift r).symm).trans $
f.trans (initial_seg.of_iso (order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift s))⟩,
λ ⟨f⟩, ⟨(initial_seg.of_iso (order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift r)).trans $
f.trans (initial_seg.of_iso (order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift s).symm)⟩⟩
theorem lift_type_eq {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r s} [is_well_order α r] [is_well_order β s] :
lift.{u (max v w)} (type r) = lift.{v (max u w)} (type s) ↔ nonempty (r ≃o s) :=
quotient.eq.trans
⟨λ ⟨f⟩, ⟨(order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift r).symm.trans $
f.trans (order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift s)⟩,
λ ⟨f⟩, ⟨(order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift r).trans $
f.trans (order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift s).symm⟩⟩
theorem lift_type_lt {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r s} [is_well_order α r] [is_well_order β s] :
lift.{u (max v w)} (type r) < lift.{v (max u w)} (type s) ↔ nonempty (r ≺i s) :=
by haveI := @order_embedding.is_well_order _ _ (@equiv.ulift.{u (max v w)} α ⁻¹'o r)
r (order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift.{u (max v w)} r) _;
haveI := @order_embedding.is_well_order _ _ (@equiv.ulift.{v (max u w)} β ⁻¹'o s)
s (order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift.{v (max u w)} s) _; exact
⟨λ ⟨f⟩, ⟨(f.equiv_lt (order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift r).symm).lt_le
(initial_seg.of_iso (order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift s))⟩,
λ ⟨f⟩, ⟨(f.equiv_lt (order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift r)).lt_le
(initial_seg.of_iso (order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift s).symm)⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem lift_le {a b : ordinal} : lift.{u v} a ≤ lift b ↔ a ≤ b :=
induction_on a $ λ α r _, induction_on b $ λ β s _,
by rw ← lift_umax; exactI lift_type_le
@[simp] theorem lift_inj {a b : ordinal} : lift a = lift b ↔ a = b :=
by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
@[simp] theorem lift_lt {a b : ordinal} : lift a < lift b ↔ a < b :=
by simp [lt_iff_le_not_le, -not_le]
@[simp] theorem lift_zero : lift 0 = 0 :=
quotient.sound ⟨(order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift _).trans
⟨equiv.ulift.trans equiv.ulift.symm, λ a b, iff.rfl⟩⟩
theorem zero_eq_lift_type_empty : 0 = lift.{0 u} (@type empty empty_relation _) :=
by rw [← zero_eq_type_empty, lift_zero]
@[simp] theorem lift_one : lift 1 = 1 :=
quotient.sound ⟨(order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift _).trans
⟨equiv.ulift.trans equiv.ulift.symm, λ a b, iff.rfl⟩⟩
theorem one_eq_lift_type_unit : 1 = lift.{0 u} (@type unit empty_relation _) :=
by rw [← one_eq_type_unit, lift_one]
@[simp] theorem lift_add (a b) : lift (a + b) = lift a + lift b :=
quotient.induction_on₂ a b $ λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩,
quotient.sound ⟨(order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift _).trans
(order_iso.sum_lex_congr (order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift _)
(order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
@[simp] theorem lift_succ (a) : lift (succ a) = succ (lift a) :=
by unfold succ; simp
@[simp] theorem lift_card (a) : (card a).lift = card (lift a) :=
induction_on a $ λ α r _, rfl
theorem lift_down' {a : cardinal.{u}} {b : ordinal.{max u v}}
(h : card b ≤ a.lift) : ∃ a', lift a' = b :=
let ⟨c, e⟩ := cardinal.lift_down h in
quotient.induction_on c (λ α, induction_on b $ λ β s _ e', begin
resetI, dsimp at e',
rw [← cardinal.lift_id'.{(max u v) u} (mk β),
← cardinal.lift_umax.{u v}, lift_mk_eq.{u (max u v) (max u v)}] at e',
cases e' with f,
have g := order_iso.preimage f s,
haveI := g.to_order_embedding.is_well_order,
have := lift_type_eq.{u (max u v) (max u v)}.2 ⟨g⟩,
rw [lift_id, lift_umax.{u v}] at this,
exact ⟨_, this⟩
end) e
theorem lift_down {a : ordinal.{u}} {b : ordinal.{max u v}}
(h : b ≤ lift a) : ∃ a', lift a' = b :=
@lift_down' (card a) _ (by rw lift_card; exact card_le_card h)
theorem le_lift_iff {a : ordinal.{u}} {b : ordinal.{max u v}} :
b ≤ lift a ↔ ∃ a', lift a' = b ∧ a' ≤ a :=
⟨λ h, let ⟨a', e⟩ := lift_down h in ⟨a', e, lift_le.1 $ e.symm ▸ h⟩,
λ ⟨a', e, h⟩, e ▸ lift_le.2 h⟩
theorem lt_lift_iff {a : ordinal.{u}} {b : ordinal.{max u v}} :
b < lift a ↔ ∃ a', lift a' = b ∧ a' < a :=
⟨λ h, let ⟨a', e⟩ := lift_down (le_of_lt h) in
⟨a', e, lift_lt.1 $ e.symm ▸ h⟩,
λ ⟨a', e, h⟩, e ▸ lift_lt.2 h⟩
/-- `ω` is the first infinite ordinal, defined as the order type of `ℕ`. -/
def omega : ordinal.{u} := lift $ @type ℕ (<) _
theorem card_omega : card omega = cardinal.omega := rfl
@[simp] theorem lift_omega : lift omega = omega := lift_lift _
theorem type_le' {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[is_well_order α r] [is_well_order β s] : type r ≤ type s ↔ nonempty (r ≼o s) :=
⟨λ ⟨f⟩, ⟨f⟩, λ ⟨f⟩, ⟨f.collapse⟩⟩
theorem add_le_add_right {a b : ordinal} : a ≤ b → ∀ c, a + c ≤ b + c :=
induction_on a $ λ α₁ r₁ _, induction_on b $ λ α₂ r₂ _ ⟨⟨⟨f, fo⟩, fi⟩⟩ c,
induction_on c $ λ β s _, by exactI type_le'.2
⟨⟨embedding.sum_congr f (embedding.refl _),
λ a b, by cases a with a a; cases b with b b; simp [fo]⟩⟩
theorem le_add_left (a b : ordinal) : a ≤ b + a :=
by simpa using add_le_add_right (zero_le b) a
theorem le_total (a b : ordinal) : a ≤ b ∨ b ≤ a :=
match lt_or_eq_of_le (le_add_left b a), lt_or_eq_of_le (le_add_right a b) with
| or.inr h, _ := by rw h; exact or.inl (le_add_right _ _)
| _, or.inr h := by rw h; exact or.inr (le_add_left _ _)
| or.inl h₁, or.inl h₂ := induction_on a (λ α₁ r₁ _,
induction_on b $ λ α₂ r₂ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩, begin
resetI,
rw [← typein_top f, ← typein_top g, le_iff_lt_or_eq,
le_iff_lt_or_eq, typein_lt_typein, typein_lt_typein],
rcases trichotomous_of (sum.lex r₁ r₂) g.top f.top with h|h|h; simp [h],
end) h₁ h₂
end
instance : decidable_linear_order ordinal :=
{ le_total := le_total,
decidable_le := classical.dec_rel _,
..ordinal.partial_order }
theorem lt_succ {a b : ordinal} : a < succ b ↔ a ≤ b :=
by rw [← not_le, succ_le, not_lt]
theorem add_lt_add_iff_left (a) {b c : ordinal} : a + b < a + c ↔ b < c :=
by rw [← not_le, ← not_le, add_le_add_iff_left]
theorem lt_of_add_lt_add_right {a b c : ordinal} : a + b < c + b → a < c :=
le_imp_le_iff_lt_imp_lt.1 (λ h, add_le_add_right h _)
@[simp] theorem succ_lt_succ {a b : ordinal} : succ a < succ b ↔ a < b :=
by rw [lt_succ, succ_le]
@[simp] theorem succ_le_succ {a b : ordinal} : succ a ≤ succ b ↔ a ≤ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 succ_lt_succ
theorem succ_inj {a b : ordinal} : succ a = succ b ↔ a = b :=
by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
theorem add_le_add_iff_right {a b : ordinal} (n : ℕ) : a + n ≤ b + n ↔ a ≤ b :=
by induction n; simp [*, -nat.cast_succ, (nat_cast_succ _).symm, add_succ, succ_inj]
theorem add_right_cancel {a b : ordinal} (n : ℕ) : a + n = b + n ↔ a = b :=
by simp [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
@[simp] theorem card_eq_zero {o} : card o = 0 ↔ o = 0 :=
⟨induction_on o $ λ α r _ h, begin
refine le_antisymm (le_of_not_lt $
λ hn, ne_zero_iff_nonempty.2 _ h) (zero_le _),
rw [← succ_le, succ_zero] at hn, cases hn with f,
exact ⟨f ⟨()⟩⟩
end, λ e, by simp [e]⟩
@[simp] theorem type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty [is_well_order α r] : type r ≠ 0 ↔ nonempty α :=
(not_congr (@card_eq_zero (type r))).symm.trans ne_zero_iff_nonempty
@[simp] theorem type_eq_zero_iff_empty [is_well_order α r] : type r = 0 ↔ ¬ nonempty α :=
(not_iff_comm.1 type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty).symm
instance : zero_ne_one_class ordinal.{u} :=
{ zero := 0, one := 1, zero_ne_one :=
ne.symm $ type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty.2 ⟨⟨()⟩⟩ }
theorem zero_lt_one : (0 : ordinal) < 1 :=
by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, zero_le]
/-- The ordinal predecessor of `o` is `o'` if `o = succ o'`,
and `o` otherwise. -/
def pred (o : ordinal.{u}) : ordinal.{u} :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then classical.some h else o
@[simp] theorem pred_succ (o) : pred (succ o) = o :=
by have h : ∃ a, succ o = succ a := ⟨_, rfl⟩;
simpa [pred, h] using (succ_inj.1 $ classical.some_spec h).symm
theorem pred_le_self (o) : pred o ≤ o :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then let ⟨a, e⟩ := h in
by rw [e, pred_succ]; exact le_of_lt (lt_succ_self _)
else by simp [pred, h]
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ {o} : pred o = o ↔ ¬ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨λ e ⟨a, e'⟩, by rw [e', pred_succ] at e; exact ne_of_lt (lt_succ_self _) e,
λ h, dif_neg h⟩
theorem pred_lt_iff_is_succ {o} : pred o < o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
iff.trans (by simp [le_antisymm_iff, pred_le_self])
(iff_not_comm.1 pred_eq_iff_not_succ).symm
theorem succ_pred_iff_is_succ {o} : succ (pred o) = o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨λ e, ⟨_, e.symm⟩, λ ⟨a, e⟩, by simp [e]⟩
theorem succ_lt_of_not_succ {o} (h : ¬ ∃ a, o = succ a) {b} : succ b < o ↔ b < o :=
⟨lt_trans (lt_succ_self _), λ l,
lt_of_le_of_ne (succ_le.2 l) (λ e, h ⟨_, e.symm⟩)⟩
theorem lt_pred {a b} : a < pred b ↔ succ a < b :=
if h : ∃ a, b = succ a then let ⟨c, e⟩ := h in
by rw [e, pred_succ, succ_lt_succ]
else by simpa [pred, h, succ_lt_of_not_succ]
theorem pred_le {a b} : pred a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ succ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 lt_pred
@[simp] theorem lift_is_succ {o} : (∃ a, lift o = succ a) ↔ (∃ a, o = succ a) :=
⟨λ ⟨a, h⟩,
let ⟨b, e⟩ := lift_down $ show a ≤ lift o, from le_of_lt $
h.symm ▸ lt_succ_self _ in
⟨b, lift_inj.1 $ by rw [h, ← e, lift_succ]⟩,
λ ⟨a, h⟩, ⟨lift a, by simp [h]⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem lift_pred (o) : lift (pred o) = pred (lift o) :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then
by cases h with a e; simp [e]
else by rw [pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 h,
pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 (mt lift_is_succ.1 h)]
/-- A limit ordinal is an ordinal which is not zero and not a successor. -/
def is_limit (o : ordinal) : Prop := o ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ a < o, succ a < o
theorem not_zero_is_limit : ¬ is_limit 0
| ⟨h, _⟩ := h rfl
theorem not_succ_is_limit (o) : ¬ is_limit (succ o)
| ⟨_, h⟩ := lt_irrefl _ (h _ (lt_succ_self _))
theorem not_succ_of_is_limit {o} (h : is_limit o) : ¬ ∃ a, o = succ a
| ⟨a, e⟩ := not_succ_is_limit a (e ▸ h)
theorem succ_lt_of_is_limit {o} (h : is_limit o) {a} : succ a < o ↔ a < o :=
⟨lt_trans (lt_succ_self _), h.2 _⟩
theorem le_succ_of_is_limit {o} (h : is_limit o) {a} : o ≤ succ a ↔ o ≤ a :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 $ succ_lt_of_is_limit h
theorem limit_le {o} (h : is_limit o) {a} : o ≤ a ↔ ∀ x < o, x ≤ a :=
⟨λ h x l, le_trans (le_of_lt l) h,
λ H, (le_succ_of_is_limit h).1 $ le_of_not_lt $ λ hn,
not_lt_of_le (H _ hn) (lt_succ_self _)⟩
theorem lt_limit {o} (h : is_limit o) {a} : a < o ↔ ∃ x < o, a < x :=
by simpa [not_ball] using not_congr (@limit_le _ h a)
@[simp] theorem lift_is_limit (o) : is_limit (lift o) ↔ is_limit o :=
and_congr (not_congr $ by simpa using @lift_inj o 0)
⟨λ H a h, lift_lt.1 $ by simpa using H _ (lift_lt.2 h),
λ H a h, let ⟨a', e⟩ := lift_down (le_of_lt h) in
by rw [← e, ← lift_succ, lift_lt];
rw [← e, lift_lt] at h; exact H a' h⟩
theorem is_limit.pos {o : ordinal} (h : is_limit o) : 0 < o :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (zero_le _) h.1.symm
theorem is_limit.one_lt {o : ordinal} (h : is_limit o) : 1 < o :=
by simpa using h.2 _ h.pos
theorem is_limit.nat_lt {o : ordinal} (h : is_limit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, (n : ordinal) < o
| 0 := h.pos
| (n+1) := h.2 _ (is_limit.nat_lt n)
theorem zero_or_succ_or_limit (o : ordinal) :
o = 0 ∨ (∃ a, o = succ a) ∨ is_limit o :=
if o0 : o = 0 then or.inl o0 else
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then or.inr (or.inl h) else
or.inr $ or.inr ⟨o0, λ a, (succ_lt_of_not_succ h).2⟩
instance : is_well_order ordinal (<) := ⟨wf⟩
@[elab_as_eliminator] def limit_rec_on {C : ordinal → Sort*}
(o : ordinal) (H₁ : C 0) (H₂ : ∀ o, C o → C (succ o))
(H₃ : ∀ o, is_limit o → (∀ o' < o, C o') → C o) : C o :=
wf.fix (λ o IH,
if o0 : o = 0 then by rw o0; exact H₁ else
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then
by rw ← succ_pred_iff_is_succ.2 h; exact
H₂ _ (IH _ $ pred_lt_iff_is_succ.2 h)
else H₃ _ ⟨o0, λ a, (succ_lt_of_not_succ h).2⟩ IH) o
@[simp] theorem limit_rec_on_zero {C} (H₁ H₂ H₃) : @limit_rec_on C 0 H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ :=
by rw [limit_rec_on, well_founded.fix_eq]; simp; refl
set_option pp.proofs true
@[simp] theorem limit_rec_on_succ {C} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@limit_rec_on C (succ o) H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o (@limit_rec_on C o H₁ H₂ H₃) :=
begin
have h : ∃ a, succ o = succ a := ⟨_, rfl⟩,
rw [limit_rec_on, well_founded.fix_eq,
dif_neg (succ_ne_zero o), dif_pos h],
generalize : limit_rec_on._proof_2 (succ o) h = h₂,
generalize : limit_rec_on._proof_3 (succ o) h = h₃,
revert h₂ h₃, generalize e : pred (succ o) = o', intros,
rw pred_succ at e, subst o', refl
end
@[simp] theorem limit_rec_on_limit {C} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ h) :
@limit_rec_on C o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o h (λ x h, @limit_rec_on C x H₁ H₂ H₃) :=
by rw [limit_rec_on, well_founded.fix_eq,
dif_neg h.1, dif_neg (not_succ_of_is_limit h)]; refl
/-- A normal ordinal function is a strictly increasing function which is
order-continuous. -/
def is_normal (f : ordinal → ordinal) : Prop :=
(∀ o, f o < f (succ o)) ∧ ∀ o, is_limit o → ∀ a, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a
theorem is_normal.limit_le {f} (H : is_normal f) : ∀ {o}, is_limit o →
∀ {a}, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a := H.2
theorem is_normal.limit_lt {f} (H : is_normal f) {o} (h : is_limit o) {a} :
a < f o ↔ ∃ b < o, a < f b :=
not_iff_not.1 $ by simpa using H.2 _ h a
theorem is_normal.lt_iff {f} (H : is_normal f) {a b} : f a < f b ↔ a < b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_strict_mono f $ λ a b,
limit_rec_on b (not.elim (not_lt_of_le $ zero_le _))
(λ b IH h, (lt_or_eq_of_le (lt_succ.1 h)).elim
(λ h, lt_trans (IH h) (H.1 _))
(λ e, e ▸ H.1 _))
(λ b l IH h, lt_of_lt_of_le (H.1 a)
((H.2 _ l _).1 (le_refl _) _ (l.2 _ h)))
theorem is_normal.le_iff {f} (H : is_normal f) {a b} : f a ≤ f b ↔ a ≤ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 H.lt_iff
theorem is_normal.inj {f} (H : is_normal f) {a b} : f a = f b ↔ a = b :=
by simp [le_antisymm_iff, H.le_iff]
theorem is_normal.le_self {f} (H : is_normal f) (a) : a ≤ f a :=
limit_rec_on a (zero_le _)
(λ a IH, succ_le.2 $ lt_of_le_of_lt IH (H.1 _))
(λ a l IH, (limit_le l).2 $ λ b h,
le_trans (IH b h) $ H.le_iff.2 $ le_of_lt h)
theorem is_normal.le_set {f} (H : is_normal f) (p : ordinal → Prop)
(p0 : ∃ x, p x) (S)
(H₂ : ∀ o, S ≤ o ↔ ∀ a, p a → a ≤ o) {o} :
f S ≤ o ↔ ∀ a, p a → f a ≤ o :=
⟨λ h a pa, le_trans (H.le_iff.2 ((H₂ _).1 (le_refl _) _ pa)) h,
λ h, begin
revert H₂, apply limit_rec_on S,
{ intro H₂,
cases p0 with x px,
have := le_zero.1 ((H₂ _).1 (zero_le _) _ px),
rw this at px, exact h _ px },
{ intros S _ H₂,
rcases not_ball.1 (mt (H₂ S).2 $ not_le_of_lt $ lt_succ_self _) with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩,
exact le_trans (H.le_iff.2 $ succ_le.2 $ not_le.1 h₂) (h _ h₁) },
{ intros S L _ H₂, apply (H.2 _ L _).2, intros a h',
rcases not_ball.1 (mt (H₂ a).2 (not_le.2 h')) with ⟨b, h₁, h₂⟩,
exact le_trans (H.le_iff.2 $ le_of_lt $ not_le.1 h₂) (h _ h₁) }
end⟩
theorem is_normal.le_set' {f} (H : is_normal f) (p : α → Prop) (g : α → ordinal)
(p0 : ∃ x, p x) (S)
(H₂ : ∀ o, S ≤ o ↔ ∀ a, p a → g a ≤ o) {o} :
f S ≤ o ↔ ∀ a, p a → f (g a) ≤ o :=
(H.le_set (λ x, ∃ y, p y ∧ x = g y)
(let ⟨x, px⟩ := p0 in ⟨_, _, px, rfl⟩) _
(λ o, (H₂ o).trans $
by repeat {simp <|> refine (forall_congr (λ _, _)).trans forall_swap})).trans
(by repeat {simp <|> refine forall_swap.trans (forall_congr (λ _, _))})
theorem is_normal.refl : is_normal id :=
⟨λ x, lt_succ_self _, λ o l a, limit_le l⟩
theorem is_normal.trans {f g} (H₁ : is_normal f) (H₂ : is_normal g) :
is_normal (λ x, f (g x)) :=
⟨λ x, H₁.lt_iff.2 (H₂.1 _),
λ o l a, H₁.le_set' (< o) g ⟨_, l.pos⟩ _ (λ c, H₂.2 _ l _)⟩
theorem is_normal.is_limit {f} (H : is_normal f) {o} (l : is_limit o) :
is_limit (f o) :=
⟨ne_of_gt $ lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le _) $ H.lt_iff.2 l.pos,
λ a h, let ⟨b, h₁, h₂⟩ := (H.limit_lt l).1 h in
lt_of_le_of_lt (succ_le.2 h₂) (H.lt_iff.2 h₁)⟩
theorem add_le_of_limit {a b c : ordinal.{u}}
(h : is_limit b) : a + b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a + b' ≤ c :=
⟨λ h b' l, le_trans (add_le_add_left (le_of_lt l) _) h,
λ H, le_of_not_lt $
induction_on a (λ α r _, induction_on b $ λ β s _ h H l, begin
resetI,
suffices : ∀ x : β, sum.lex r s (sum.inr x) (enum _ _ l),
{ cases enum _ _ l with x x,
{ simpa using this (enum s 0 h.pos) },
{ exact irrefl _ (this _) } },
intros x,
rw [← typein_lt_typein (sum.lex r s), typein_enum],
have := H _ (h.2 _ (typein_lt_type s x)),
rw [add_succ, succ_le] at this,
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (type_le'.2
⟨order_embedding.of_monotone (λ a, _) (λ a b, _)⟩) this,
{ rcases a with ⟨a | b, h⟩,
{ exact sum.inl a },
{ exact sum.inr ⟨b, by simpa using h⟩ } },
{ rcases a with ⟨a | a, h₁⟩; rcases b with ⟨b | b, h₂⟩; simp }
end) h H⟩
theorem add_is_normal (a : ordinal) : is_normal ((+) a) :=
⟨λ b, (add_lt_add_iff_left a).2 (lt_succ_self _),
λ b l c, add_le_of_limit l⟩
theorem add_is_limit (a) {b} : is_limit b → is_limit (a + b) :=
(add_is_normal a).is_limit
def typein.principal_seg {α : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] :
@principal_seg α ordinal.{u} r (<) :=
⟨order_embedding.of_monotone (typein r)
(λ a b, (typein_lt_typein r).2), type r, λ b,
⟨λ h, ⟨enum r _ h, typein_enum r h⟩,
λ ⟨a, e⟩, e ▸ typein_lt_type _ _⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem typein.principal_seg_coe (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] :
(typein.principal_seg r : α → ordinal) = typein r := rfl
/-- The minimal element of a nonempty family of ordinals -/
def min {ι} (I : nonempty ι) (f : ι → ordinal) : ordinal :=
wf.min (set.range f) (let ⟨i⟩ := I in set.ne_empty_of_mem (set.mem_range_self i))
theorem min_eq {ι} (I) (f : ι → ordinal) : ∃ i, min I f = f i :=
let ⟨i, e⟩ := wf.min_mem (set.range f) _ in ⟨i, e.symm⟩
theorem min_le {ι I} (f : ι → ordinal) (i) : min I f ≤ f i :=
le_of_not_gt $ wf.not_lt_min (set.range f) _ (set.mem_range_self i)
theorem le_min {ι I} {f : ι → ordinal} {a} : a ≤ min I f ↔ ∀ i, a ≤ f i :=
⟨λ h i, le_trans h (min_le _ _),
λ h, let ⟨i, e⟩ := min_eq I f in e.symm ▸ h i⟩
/-- The minimal element of a nonempty set of ordinals -/
def omin (S : set ordinal.{u}) (H : ∃ x, x ∈ S) : ordinal.{u} :=
@min.{(u+2) u} S (let ⟨x, px⟩ := H in ⟨⟨x, px⟩⟩) subtype.val
theorem omin_mem (S H) : omin S H ∈ S :=
let ⟨⟨i, h⟩, e⟩ := @min_eq S _ _ in
(show omin S H = i, from e).symm ▸ h
theorem le_omin {S H a} : a ≤ omin S H ↔ ∀ i ∈ S, a ≤ i :=
le_min.trans set.set_coe.forall
theorem omin_le {S H i} (h : i ∈ S) : omin S H ≤ i :=
le_omin.1 (le_refl _) _ h
@[simp] theorem lift_min {ι} (I) (f : ι → ordinal) : lift (min I f) = min I (lift ∘ f) :=
le_antisymm (le_min.2 $ λ a, lift_le.2 $ min_le _ a) $
let ⟨i, e⟩ := min_eq I (lift ∘ f) in
by rw e; exact lift_le.2 (le_min.2 $ λ j, lift_le.1 $
by have := min_le (lift ∘ f) j; rwa e at this)
def lift.initial_seg : @initial_seg ordinal.{u} ordinal.{max u v} (<) (<) :=
⟨⟨⟨lift.{u v}, λ a b, lift_inj.1⟩, λ a b, lift_lt.symm⟩,
λ a b h, lift_down (le_of_lt h)⟩
@[simp] theorem lift.initial_seg_coe : (lift.initial_seg : ordinal → ordinal) = lift := rfl
/-- `univ.{u v}` is the order type of the ordinals of `Type u` as a member
of `ordinal.{v}` (when `u < v`). It is an inaccessible cardinal. -/
def univ := lift.{(u+1) v} (@type ordinal.{u} (<) _)
theorem univ_id : univ.{u (u+1)} = @type ordinal.{u} (<) _ := lift_id _
@[simp] theorem lift_univ : lift.{_ w} univ.{u v} = univ.{u (max v w)} := lift_lift _
theorem univ_umax : univ.{u (max (u+1) v)} = univ.{u v} := congr_fun lift_umax _
def lift.principal_seg : @principal_seg ordinal.{u} ordinal.{max (u+1) v} (<) (<) :=
⟨↑lift.initial_seg.{u (max (u+1) v)}, univ.{u v}, begin
refine λ b, induction_on b _, introsI β s _,
rw [univ, ← lift_umax], split; intro h,
{ rw ← lift_id (type s) at h ⊢,
cases lift_type_lt.1 h with f, cases f with f a hf,
existsi a, revert hf,
apply induction_on a, intros α r _ hf,
refine lift_type_eq.{u (max (u+1) v) (max (u+1) v)}.2
⟨(order_iso.of_surjective (order_embedding.of_monotone _ _) _).symm⟩,
{ exact λ b, enum r (f b) ((hf _).2 ⟨_, rfl⟩) },
{ refine λ a b h, (typein_lt_typein r).1 _,
rw [typein_enum, typein_enum],
exact f.ord'.1 h },
{ intro a', cases (hf _).1 (typein_lt_type _ a') with b e,
existsi b, simp, simp [e] } },
{ cases h with a e, rw [← e],
apply induction_on a, intros α r _,
exact lift_type_lt.{u (u+1) (max (u+1) v)}.2
⟨typein.principal_seg r⟩ }
end⟩
@[simp] theorem lift.principal_seg_coe :
(lift.principal_seg.{u v} : ordinal → ordinal) = lift.{u (max (u+1) v)} := rfl
@[simp] theorem lift.principal_seg_top : lift.principal_seg.top = univ := rfl
theorem lift.principal_seg_top' :
lift.principal_seg.{u (u+1)}.top = @type ordinal.{u} (<) _ :=
by simp [univ_id]
/-- `a - b` is the unique ordinal satisfying
`b + (a - b) = a` when `b ≤ a`. -/
def sub (a b : ordinal.{u}) : ordinal.{u} :=
omin {o | a ≤ b+o} ⟨a, le_add_left _ _⟩
instance : has_sub ordinal := ⟨sub⟩
theorem le_add_sub (a b : ordinal) : a ≤ b + (a - b) :=
omin_mem {o | a ≤ b+o} _
theorem sub_le {a b c : ordinal} : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b + c :=
⟨λ h, le_trans (le_add_sub a b) (add_le_add_left h _),
λ h, omin_le h⟩
theorem lt_sub {a b c : ordinal} : a < b - c ↔ c + a < b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.1 sub_le
theorem add_sub_cancel (a b : ordinal) : a + b - a = b :=
le_antisymm (sub_le.2 $ le_refl _)
((add_le_add_iff_left a).1 $ le_add_sub _ _)
theorem sub_eq_of_add_eq {a b c : ordinal} (h : a + b = c) : c - a = b :=
h ▸ add_sub_cancel _ _
theorem sub_le_self (a b : ordinal) : a - b ≤ a :=
sub_le.2 $ le_add_left _ _
theorem add_sub_cancel_of_le {a b : ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : b + (a - b) = a :=
le_antisymm begin
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit (a-b) with e|⟨c,e⟩|l,
{ simp [e, h] },
{ rw [e, add_succ, succ_le, ← lt_sub, e], apply lt_succ_self },
{ exact (add_le_of_limit l).2 (λ c l, le_of_lt (lt_sub.1 l)) }
end (le_add_sub _ _)
@[simp] theorem sub_zero (a : ordinal) : a - 0 = a :=
by simpa using add_sub_cancel 0 a
@[simp] theorem zero_sub (a : ordinal) : 0 - a = 0 :=
by rw ← le_zero; apply sub_le_self
@[simp] theorem sub_self (a : ordinal) : a - a = 0 :=
by simpa using add_sub_cancel a 0
theorem sub_eq_zero_iff_le {a b : ordinal} : a - b = 0 ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨λ h, by simpa [h] using le_add_sub a b,
λ h, by rwa [← le_zero, sub_le, add_zero]⟩
theorem sub_sub (a b c : ordinal) : a - b - c = a - (b + c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ d, by rw [sub_le, sub_le, sub_le, add_assoc]
theorem add_sub_add_cancel (a b c : ordinal) : a + b - (a + c) = b - c :=
by rw [← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel]
theorem sub_is_limit {a b} (l : is_limit a) (h : b < a) : is_limit (a - b) :=
⟨ne_of_gt $ lt_sub.2 $ by simp [h],
λ c h, by rw [lt_sub, add_succ]; exact l.2 _ (lt_sub.1 h)⟩
@[simp] theorem one_add_omega : 1 + omega.{u} = omega :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ (le_add_left _ _),
rw [omega, one_eq_lift_type_unit, ← lift_add, lift_le, type_add],
have : is_well_order unit empty_relation := by apply_instance,
refine ⟨order_embedding.collapse (order_embedding.of_monotone _ _)⟩,
{ apply sum.rec, exact λ _, 0, exact nat.succ },
{ intros a b, cases a; cases b;
simp [empty_relation, nat.succ_pos, iff_true_intro nat.succ_lt_succ] },
end
@[simp] theorem one_add_of_omega_le {o} (h : omega ≤ o) : 1 + o = o :=
by rw [← add_sub_cancel_of_le h, ← add_assoc, one_add_omega]
instance : monoid ordinal.{u} :=
{ mul := λ a b, quotient.lift_on₂ a b
(λ ⟨α, r, wo⟩ ⟨β, s, wo'⟩, ⟦⟨β × α, prod.lex s r, by exactI prod.lex.is_well_order⟩⟧
: Well_order → Well_order → ordinal) $
λ ⟨α₁, r₁, o₁⟩ ⟨α₂, r₂, o₂⟩ ⟨β₁, s₁, p₁⟩ ⟨β₂, s₂, p₂⟩ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩,
quot.sound ⟨order_iso.prod_lex_congr g f⟩,
one := 1,
mul_assoc := λ a b c, quotient.induction_on₃ a b c $ λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩,
eq.symm $ quotient.sound ⟨⟨equiv.prod_assoc _ _ _, λ a b, begin
rcases a with ⟨⟨a₁, a₂⟩, a₃⟩,
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, b₃⟩,
simp [prod.lex_def, and_or_distrib_left, or_assoc, and_assoc]
end⟩⟩,
mul_one := λ a, induction_on a $ λ α r _, by exact quotient.sound
⟨⟨(equiv.ulift.prod_congr (equiv.refl _)).trans (equiv.unit_prod _),
λ a b, by rcases a with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, a⟩; rcases b with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, b⟩;
simp [prod.lex_def, empty_relation]⟩⟩,
one_mul := λ a, induction_on a $ λ α r _, by exact quotient.sound
⟨⟨((equiv.refl _).prod_congr equiv.ulift).trans (equiv.prod_unit _),
λ a b, by rcases a with ⟨a, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩; rcases b with ⟨b, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩;
simp [prod.lex_def, empty_relation]⟩⟩ }
@[simp] theorem type_mul {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop)
[is_well_order α r] [is_well_order β s] : type r * type s = type (prod.lex s r) := rfl
@[simp] theorem lift_mul (a b) : lift (a * b) = lift a * lift b :=
quotient.induction_on₂ a b $ λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩,
quotient.sound ⟨(order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift _).trans
(order_iso.prod_lex_congr (order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift _)
(order_iso.preimage equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
@[simp] theorem card_mul (a b) : card (a * b) = card a * card b :=
quotient.induction_on₂ a b $ λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩,
mul_comm (mk β) (mk α)
@[simp] theorem mul_zero (a : ordinal) : a * 0 = 0 :=
induction_on a $ λ α _ _, by exactI
type_eq_zero_iff_empty.2 (λ ⟨⟨⟨e⟩, _⟩⟩, e.elim)
@[simp] theorem zero_mul (a : ordinal) : 0 * a = 0 :=
induction_on a $ λ α _ _, by exactI
type_eq_zero_iff_empty.2 (λ ⟨⟨_, ⟨e⟩⟩⟩, e.elim)
theorem mul_add (a b c : ordinal) : a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c :=
quotient.induction_on₃ a b c $ λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩,
quotient.sound
⟨⟨equiv.sum_prod_distrib _ _ _,
λ a b, by rcases a with ⟨a₁|a₁, a₂⟩; rcases b with ⟨b₁|b₁, b₂⟩;
simp [prod.lex_def]⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem mul_add_one (a b : ordinal) : a * (b + 1) = a * b + a :=
by simp [mul_add]
@[simp] theorem mul_succ (a b : ordinal) : a * succ b = a * b + a := mul_add_one _ _
theorem mul_le_mul_left {a b} (c : ordinal) : a ≤ b → c * a ≤ c * b :=
quotient.induction_on₃ a b c $ λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩, begin
resetI,
refine type_le'.2 ⟨order_embedding.of_monotone
(λ a, (f a.1, a.2))
(λ a b h, _)⟩, clear_,
cases h with a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ h' a b₁ b₂ h',
{ exact prod.lex.left _ _ _ (f.to_order_embedding.ord'.1 h') },
{ exact prod.lex.right _ _ h' }
end
theorem mul_le_mul_right {a b} (c : ordinal) : a ≤ b → a * c ≤ b * c :=
quotient.induction_on₃ a b c $ λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩, begin
resetI,
refine type_le'.2 ⟨order_embedding.of_monotone
(λ a, (a.1, f a.2))
(λ a b h, _)⟩,
cases h with a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ h' a b₁ b₂ h',
{ exact prod.lex.left _ _ _ h' },
{ exact prod.lex.right _ _ (f.to_order_embedding.ord'.1 h') }
end
theorem mul_le_mul {a b c d : ordinal} (h₁ : a ≤ c) (h₂ : b ≤ d) : a * b ≤ c * d :=
le_trans (mul_le_mul_left _ h₂) (mul_le_mul_right _ h₁)
theorem mul_le_of_limit {a b c : ordinal.{u}}
(h : is_limit b) : a * b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a * b' ≤ c :=
⟨λ h b' l, le_trans (mul_le_mul_left _ (le_of_lt l)) h,
λ H, le_of_not_lt $
induction_on a (λ α r _, induction_on b $ λ β s _ h H l, begin
resetI,
suffices : ∀ a b, prod.lex s r (b, a) (enum _ _ l),
{ cases enum _ _ l with b a, exact irrefl _ (this _ _) },
intros a b,
rw [← typein_lt_typein (prod.lex s r), typein_enum],
have := H _ (h.2 _ (typein_lt_type s b)),
rw [mul_succ] at this,
have := lt_of_lt_of_le ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2
(typein_lt_type _ a)) this,
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (type_le'.2
⟨order_embedding.of_monotone (λ a, _) (λ a b, _)⟩) this,
{ rcases a with ⟨⟨b', a'⟩, h⟩,
by_cases e : b = b',
{ refine sum.inr ⟨a', _⟩,
subst e, cases h with _ _ _ _ h _ _ _ h,
{ exact (irrefl _ h).elim },
{ exact h } },
{ refine sum.inl (⟨b', _⟩, a'),
cases h with _ _ _ _ h _ _ _ h,
{ exact h }, { exact (e rfl).elim } } },
{ rcases a with ⟨⟨b₁, a₁⟩, h₁⟩,
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₂, a₂⟩, h₂⟩,
intro h, by_cases e₁ : b = b₁; by_cases e₂ : b = b₂,
{ substs b₁ b₂, simpa [prod.lex_def, @irrefl _ s _ b] using h },
{ subst b₁, simp [e₂, prod.lex_def] at h ⊢,
cases h₂; [exact asymm h h₂_h, exact e₂ rfl] },
{ simp [e₁, e₂] },
{ simpa [e₁, e₂, prod.lex_def] using h } }
end) h H⟩
theorem mul_is_normal {a : ordinal} (h : 0 < a) : is_normal ((*) a) :=
⟨λ b, by rw mul_succ; simpa using (add_lt_add_iff_left (a*b)).2 h,
λ b l c, mul_le_of_limit l⟩
theorem lt_mul_of_limit {a b c : ordinal.{u}}
(h : is_limit c) : a < b * c ↔ ∃ c' < c, a < b * c' :=
by simpa [not_ball] using not_congr (@mul_le_of_limit b c a h)
theorem mul_lt_mul_iff_left {a b c : ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b < a * c ↔ b < c :=
(mul_is_normal a0).lt_iff
theorem mul_le_mul_iff_left {a b c : ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b ≤ a * c ↔ b ≤ c :=
(mul_is_normal a0).le_iff
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left {a b c : ordinal}
(h : a < b) (c0 : 0 < c) : c * a < c * b :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_left c0).2 h
theorem mul_pos {a b : ordinal} (h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : 0 < b) : 0 < a * b :=
by simpa using mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h₂ h₁
theorem mul_ne_zero {a b : ordinal} : a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → a * b ≠ 0 :=
by simpa only [pos_iff_ne_zero] using mul_pos
theorem le_of_mul_le_mul_left {a b c : ordinal}
(h : c * a ≤ c * b) (h0 : 0 < c) : a ≤ b :=
le_imp_le_iff_lt_imp_lt.2 (λ h', mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h' h0) h
theorem mul_left_inj {a b c : ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
(mul_is_normal a0).inj
theorem mul_is_limit {a b : ordinal}
(a0 : 0 < a) : is_limit b → is_limit (a * b) :=
(mul_is_normal a0).is_limit
theorem mul_is_limit_left {a b : ordinal}
(l : is_limit a) (b0 : 0 < b) : is_limit (a * b) :=
begin
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with rfl|⟨b,rfl⟩|lb,
{ exact (lt_irrefl _).elim b0 },
{ rw mul_succ, exact add_is_limit _ l },
{ exact mul_is_limit l.pos lb }
end
/-- `a / b` is the unique ordinal `o` satisfying
`a = b * o + o'` with `o' < b`. -/
protected def div (a b : ordinal.{u}) : ordinal.{u} :=
if h : b = 0 then 0 else
omin {o | a < b * succ o} ⟨a, succ_le.1 $
by simpa using mul_le_mul_right (succ a) (succ_le.2 (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h))⟩
instance : has_div ordinal := ⟨ordinal.div⟩
@[simp] theorem div_zero (a : ordinal) : a / 0 = 0 := dif_pos rfl
def div_def (a) {b : ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a / b =
omin {o | a < b * succ o} _ := dif_neg h
theorem lt_mul_succ_div (a) {b : ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * succ (a / b) :=
by rw div_def a h; exact omin_mem {o | a < b * succ o} _
theorem lt_mul_div_add (a) {b : ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * (a / b) + b :=
by simpa using lt_mul_succ_div a h
theorem div_le {a b c : ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b ≤ c ↔ a < b * succ c :=
⟨λ h, lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_mul_succ_div a b0) (mul_le_mul_left _ $ succ_le_succ.2 h),
λ h, by rw div_def a b0; exact omin_le h⟩
theorem lt_div {a b c : ordinal} (c0 : c ≠ 0) : a < b / c ↔ c * succ a ≤ b :=
by rw [← not_le, div_le c0, not_lt]
theorem le_div {a b c : ordinal} (c0 : c ≠ 0) :
a ≤ b / c ↔ c * a ≤ b :=
begin
apply limit_rec_on a,
{ simp [zero_le] },
{ intros, rw [succ_le, lt_div c0] },
{ simp [mul_le_of_limit, limit_le, -not_lt] {contextual := tt} }
end
theorem div_lt {a b c : ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) :
a / b < c ↔ a < b * c :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.1 $ le_div b0
theorem div_le_of_le_mul {a b c : ordinal} (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / b ≤ c :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp [b0, zero_le] else
(div_le b0).2 $ lt_of_le_of_lt h $
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left (lt_succ_self _) (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 b0)
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div {a b c : ordinal} : a < b / c → c * a < b :=
le_imp_le_iff_lt_imp_lt.1 div_le_of_le_mul
@[simp] theorem zero_div (a : ordinal) : 0 / a = 0 :=
le_zero.1 $ div_le_of_le_mul $ by simp
theorem mul_div_le (a b : ordinal) : b * (a / b) ≤ a :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp [b0, zero_le] else (le_div b0).1 (le_refl _)
theorem mul_add_div (a) {b : ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (c) : (b * a + c) / b = a + c / b :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ apply (div_le b0).2,
rw [mul_succ, mul_add, add_assoc, add_lt_add_iff_left],
apply lt_mul_div_add _ b0 },
{ rw [le_div b0, mul_add, add_le_add_iff_left],
apply mul_div_le }
end
theorem div_eq_zero_of_lt {a b : ordinal} (h : a < b) : a / b = 0 :=
by rw [← le_zero, div_le $ pos_iff_ne_zero.1 $ lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le _) h];
simpa using h
@[simp] theorem mul_div_cancel (a) {b : ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : b * a / b = a :=
by simpa using mul_add_div a b0 0
@[simp] theorem div_one (a : ordinal) : a / 1 = a :=
by simpa using mul_div_cancel a one_ne_zero
@[simp] theorem div_self {a : ordinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : a / a = 1 :=
by simpa using mul_div_cancel 1 h
theorem mul_sub (a b c : ordinal) : a * (b - c) = a * b - a * c :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp [a0] else
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ d,
by rw [sub_le, ← le_div a0, sub_le, ← le_div a0, mul_add_div _ a0]
/-- Divisibility is defined by right multiplication:
`a ∣ b` if there exists `c` such that `b = a * c`. -/
instance : has_dvd ordinal := ⟨λ a b, ∃ c, b = a * c⟩
theorem dvd_def {a b : ordinal} : a ∣ b ↔ ∃ c, b = a * c := iff.rfl
theorem dvd_mul (a b : ordinal) : a ∣ a * b := ⟨_, rfl⟩
theorem dvd_trans : ∀ {a b c : ordinal}, a ∣ b → b ∣ c → a ∣ c
| a _ _ ⟨b, rfl⟩ ⟨c, rfl⟩ := ⟨b * c, mul_assoc _ _ _⟩
theorem dvd_mul_of_dvd {a b : ordinal} (c) (h : a ∣ b) : a ∣ b * c :=
dvd_trans h (dvd_mul _ _)
theorem dvd_add_iff : ∀ {a b c : ordinal}, a ∣ b → (a ∣ b + c ↔ a ∣ c)
| a _ c ⟨b, rfl⟩ :=
⟨λ ⟨d, e⟩, ⟨d - b, by rw [mul_sub, ← e, add_sub_cancel]⟩,
λ ⟨d, e⟩, by rw [e, ← mul_add]; apply dvd_mul⟩
theorem dvd_add {a b c : ordinal} (h₁ : a ∣ b) : a ∣ c → a ∣ b + c :=
(dvd_add_iff h₁).2
theorem dvd_zero (a : ordinal) : a ∣ 0 := ⟨_, (mul_zero _).symm⟩
theorem zero_dvd {a : ordinal} : 0 ∣ a ↔ a = 0 :=
⟨λ ⟨h, e⟩, by simp [e], λ e, e.symm ▸ dvd_zero _⟩
theorem one_dvd (a : ordinal) : 1 ∣ a := ⟨a, (one_mul _).symm⟩
theorem div_mul_cancel : ∀ {a b : ordinal}, a ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a * (b / a) = b
| a _ a0 ⟨b, rfl⟩ := by rw [mul_div_cancel _ a0]
theorem le_of_dvd : ∀ {a b : ordinal}, b ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a ≤ b
| a _ b0 ⟨b, rfl⟩ := by simpa using mul_le_mul_left a
(one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 (λ h : b = 0, by simpa [h] using b0))
theorem dvd_antisymm {a b : ordinal} (h₁ : a ∣ b) (h₂ : b ∣ a) : a = b :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by subst a; exact (zero_dvd.1 h₁).symm else
if b0 : b = 0 then by subst b; exact zero_dvd.1 h₂ else
le_antisymm (le_of_dvd b0 h₁) (le_of_dvd a0 h₂)
/-- `a % b` is the unique ordinal `o'` satisfying
`a = b * o + o'` with `o' < b`. -/
instance : has_mod ordinal := ⟨λ a b, a - b * (a / b)⟩
theorem mod_def (a b : ordinal) : a % b = a - b * (a / b) := rfl
@[simp] theorem mod_zero (a : ordinal) : a % 0 = a :=
by simp [mod_def]
theorem mod_eq_of_lt {a b : ordinal} (h : a < b) : a % b = a :=
by simp [mod_def, div_eq_zero_of_lt h]
@[simp] theorem zero_mod (b : ordinal) : 0 % b = 0 :=
by simp [mod_def]
theorem div_add_mod (a b : ordinal) : b * (a / b) + a % b = a :=
add_sub_cancel_of_le $ mul_div_le _ _
theorem mod_lt (a) {b : ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a % b < b :=
(add_lt_add_iff_left (b * (a / b))).1 $
by rw div_add_mod; exact lt_mul_div_add a h
@[simp] theorem mod_self (a : ordinal) : a % a = 0 :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp [a0] else
by simp [mod_def, a0]
@[simp] theorem mod_one (a : ordinal) : a % 1 = 0 :=
by simp [mod_def]
end ordinal
namespace cardinal
open ordinal
/-- The ordinal corresponding to a cardinal `c` is the least ordinal
whose cardinal is `c`. -/
def ord (c : cardinal) : ordinal :=
begin
let ι := λ α, {r // is_well_order α r},
have : ∀ α, nonempty (ι α) := λ α,
⟨classical.indefinite_description _ well_ordering_thm⟩,
let F := λ α, ordinal.min (this _) (λ i:ι α, ⟦⟨α, i.1, i.2⟩⟧),
refine quot.lift_on c F _,
suffices : ∀ {α β}, α ≈ β → F α ≤ F β,
from λ α β h, le_antisymm (this h) (this (setoid.symm h)),
intros α β h, cases h with f, refine ordinal.le_min.2 (λ i, _),
haveI := @order_embedding.is_well_order _ _
(f ⁻¹'o i.1) _ ↑(order_iso.preimage f i.1) i.2,
rw ← show type (f ⁻¹'o i.1) = ⟦⟨β, i.1, i.2⟩⟧, from
quot.sound ⟨order_iso.preimage f i.1⟩,
exact ordinal.min_le (λ i:ι α, ⟦⟨α, i.1, i.2⟩⟧) ⟨_, _⟩
end
def ord_eq_min (α : Type u) : ord (mk α) =
@ordinal.min _ _ (λ i:{r // is_well_order α r}, ⟦⟨α, i.1, i.2⟩⟧) := rfl
theorem ord_eq (α) : ∃ (r : α → α → Prop) [wo : is_well_order α r],
ord (mk α) = @type α r wo :=
let ⟨⟨r, wo⟩, h⟩ := @ordinal.min_eq _
⟨classical.indefinite_description _ well_ordering_thm⟩
(λ i:{r // is_well_order α r}, ⟦⟨α, i.1, i.2⟩⟧) in
⟨r, wo, h⟩
theorem ord_le_type (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] : ord (mk α) ≤ ordinal.type r :=
@ordinal.min_le _
⟨classical.indefinite_description _ well_ordering_thm⟩
(λ i:{r // is_well_order α r}, ⟦⟨α, i.1, i.2⟩⟧) ⟨r, _⟩
theorem ord_le {c o} : ord c ≤ o ↔ c ≤ o.card :=
quotient.induction_on c $ λ α, induction_on o $ λ β s _,
let ⟨r, _, e⟩ := ord_eq α in begin
resetI, simp, split; intro h,
{ rw e at h, exact let ⟨f⟩ := h in ⟨f.to_embedding⟩ },
{ cases h with f,
have g := order_embedding.preimage f s,
haveI := order_embedding.is_well_order g,
exact le_trans (ord_le_type _) (type_le'.2 ⟨g⟩) }
end
theorem lt_ord {c o} : o < ord c ↔ o.card < c :=
by rw [← not_le, ← not_le, ord_le]
@[simp] theorem card_ord (c) : (ord c).card = c :=
quotient.induction_on c $ λ α,
let ⟨r, _, e⟩ := ord_eq α in by simp [e]
theorem ord_card_le (o : ordinal) : o.card.ord ≤ o :=
ord_le.2 (le_refl _)
@[simp] theorem ord_le_ord {c₁ c₂} : ord c₁ ≤ ord c₂ ↔ c₁ ≤ c₂ :=
by simp [ord_le]
@[simp] theorem ord_lt_ord {c₁ c₂} : ord c₁ < ord c₂ ↔ c₁ < c₂ :=
by simp [lt_ord]
@[simp] theorem ord_zero : ord 0 = 0 :=
le_antisymm (ord_le.2 $ zero_le _) (ordinal.zero_le _)
@[simp] theorem ord_nat (n : ℕ) : ord n = n :=
le_antisymm (ord_le.2 $ by simp) $ begin
induction n with n IH,
{ apply ordinal.zero_le },
{ exact (@ordinal.succ_le n _).2 (lt_of_le_of_lt IH $
ord_lt_ord.2 $ nat_cast_lt.2 (nat.lt_succ_self n)) }
end
@[simp] theorem lift_ord (c) : (ord c).lift = ord (lift c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ o, le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 $ begin
split; intro h,
{ rcases ordinal.lt_lift_iff.1 h with ⟨a, e, h⟩,
rwa [← e, lt_ord, ← lift_card, lift_lt, ← lt_ord] },
{ rw lt_ord at h,
rcases lift_down' (le_of_lt h) with ⟨o, rfl⟩,
rw [← lift_card, lift_lt] at h,
rwa [ordinal.lift_lt, lt_ord] }
end
def ord.order_embedding : @order_embedding cardinal ordinal (<) (<) :=
order_embedding.of_monotone cardinal.ord $ λ a b, cardinal.ord_lt_ord.2
@[simp] theorem ord.order_embedding_coe :
(ord.order_embedding : cardinal → ordinal) = ord := rfl
/-- The cardinal `univ` is the cardinality of ordinal `univ`, or
equivalently the cardinal of `ordinal.{u}`, or `cardinal.{u}`,
as an element of `cardinal.{v}` (when `u < v`). -/
def univ := lift.{(u+1) v} (mk ordinal)
theorem univ_id : univ.{u (u+1)} = mk ordinal := lift_id _
@[simp] theorem lift_univ : lift.{_ w} univ.{u v} = univ.{u (max v w)} := lift_lift _
theorem univ_umax : univ.{u (max (u+1) v)} = univ.{u v} := congr_fun lift_umax _
theorem lift_lt_univ (c : cardinal) : lift.{u (u+1)} c < univ.{u (u+1)} :=
by simpa [ord_le, succ_le] using le_of_lt
(lift.principal_seg.{u (u+1)}.lt_top (succ c).ord)
theorem lift_lt_univ' (c : cardinal) : lift.{u (max (u+1) v)} c < univ.{u v} :=
by simpa [univ_umax] using
lift_lt.{_ (max (u+1) v)}.2 (lift_lt_univ c)
@[simp] theorem ord_univ : ord univ.{u v} = ordinal.univ.{u v} :=
le_antisymm (ord_card_le _) $ le_of_forall_lt $ λ o h,
lt_ord.2 begin
rcases lift.principal_seg.{u v}.down'.1
(by simpa using h) with ⟨o', rfl⟩,
simp, rw [← lift_card],
apply lift_lt_univ'
end
theorem lt_univ {c} : c < univ.{u (u+1)} ↔ ∃ c', c = lift.{u (u+1)} c' :=
⟨λ h, begin
have := ord_lt_ord.2 h,
rw ord_univ at this,
cases lift.principal_seg.{u (u+1)}.down'.1
(by simpa) with o e,
have := card_ord c,
rw [← e, lift.principal_seg_coe, ← lift_card] at this,
exact ⟨_, this.symm⟩
end, λ ⟨c', e⟩, e.symm ▸ lift_lt_univ _⟩
theorem lt_univ' {c} : c < univ.{u v} ↔ ∃ c', c = lift.{u (max (u+1) v)} c' :=
⟨λ h, let ⟨a, e, h'⟩ := lt_lift_iff.1 h in begin
rw [← univ_id] at h',
rcases lt_univ.{u}.1 h' with ⟨c', rfl⟩,
exact ⟨c', by simp [e.symm]⟩
end, λ ⟨c', e⟩, e.symm ▸ lift_lt_univ' _⟩
end cardinal
namespace ordinal
@[simp] theorem card_univ : card univ = cardinal.univ := rfl
/-- The supremum of a family of ordinals -/
def sup {ι} (f : ι → ordinal) : ordinal :=
omin {c | ∀ i, f i ≤ c}
⟨(sup (cardinal.succ ∘ card ∘ f)).ord, λ i, le_of_lt $
cardinal.lt_ord.2 (lt_of_lt_of_le (cardinal.lt_succ_self _) (le_sup _ _))⟩
theorem le_sup {ι} (f : ι → ordinal) : ∀ i, f i ≤ sup f :=
omin_mem {c | ∀ i, f i ≤ c} _
theorem sup_le {ι} {f : ι → ordinal} {a} : sup f ≤ a ↔ ∀ i, f i ≤ a :=
⟨λ h i, le_trans (le_sup _ _) h, λ h, omin_le h⟩
theorem lt_sup {ι} {f : ι → ordinal} {a} : a < sup f ↔ ∃ i, a < f i :=
by simpa [not_forall] using not_congr (@sup_le _ f a)
theorem is_normal.sup {f} (H : is_normal f)
{ι} {g : ι → ordinal} (h : nonempty ι) : f (sup g) = sup (f ∘ g) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ a,
by rw [sup_le, comp, H.le_set' (λ_:ι, true) g
(let ⟨i⟩ := h in ⟨i, ⟨⟩⟩)];
simp [sup_le]
/-- The supremum of a family of ordinals indexed by the set
of ordinals less than some `o : ordinal.{u}`.
(This is not a special case of `sup` over the subtype,
because `{a // a < o} : Type (u+1)` and `sup` only works over
families in `Type u`.) -/
def bsup (o : ordinal.{u}) : (Π a < o, ordinal.{max u v}) → ordinal.{max u v} :=
match o, o.out, o.out_eq with
| _, ⟨α, r, _⟩, rfl, f := by exactI sup (λ a, f (typein r a) (typein_lt_type _ _))
end
theorem bsup_le {o f a} : bsup.{u v} o f ≤ a ↔ ∀ i h, f i h ≤ a :=
match o, o.out, o.out_eq, f :
∀ o w (e : ⟦w⟧ = o) (f : Π (a : ordinal.{u}), a < o → ordinal.{(max u v)}),
bsup._match_1 o w e f ≤ a ↔ ∀ i h, f i h ≤ a with
| _, ⟨α, r, _⟩, rfl, f := by rw [bsup._match_1, sup_le]; exactI
⟨λ H i h, by simpa using H (enum r i h), λ H b, H _ _⟩
end
theorem bsup_type (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] (f) :
bsup (type r) f = sup (λ a, f (typein r a) (typein_lt_type _ _)) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ o,
by rw [bsup_le, sup_le]; exact
⟨λ H b, H _ _, λ H i h, by simpa using H (enum r i h)⟩
theorem le_bsup {o} (f : Π a < o, ordinal) (i h) : f i h ≤ bsup o f :=
bsup_le.1 (le_refl _) _ _
theorem is_normal.bsup {f} (H : is_normal f)
{o : ordinal} : ∀ (g : Π a < o, ordinal) (h : o ≠ 0),
f (bsup o g) = bsup o (λ a h, f (g a h)) :=
induction_on o $ λ α r _ g h,
by resetI; rw [bsup_type,
H.sup (type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty.1 h), bsup_type]
/-- The ordinal exponential, defined by transfinite recursion. -/
def power (a b : ordinal) : ordinal :=
if a = 0 then 1 - b else
limit_rec_on b 1 (λ _ IH, IH * a) (λ b _, bsup.{u u} b)
instance : has_pow ordinal ordinal := ⟨power⟩
local infixr ^ := @pow ordinal ordinal ordinal.has_pow
theorem zero_power' (a : ordinal) : 0 ^ a = 1 - a :=
by simp [pow, power]
@[simp] theorem zero_power {a : ordinal} (a0 : a ≠ 0) : 0 ^ a = 0 :=
by rwa [zero_power', sub_eq_zero_iff_le, one_le_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp] theorem power_zero (a : ordinal) : a ^ 0 = 1 :=
by by_cases a = 0; simp [pow, power, h]
@[simp] theorem power_succ (a b : ordinal) : a ^ succ b = a ^ b * a :=
if h : a = 0 then by subst a; simp [succ_ne_zero]
else by simp [pow, power, h]
theorem power_limit {a b : ordinal} (a0 : a ≠ 0) (h : is_limit b) :
a ^ b = bsup.{u u} b (λ c _, a ^ c) :=
by simp [pow, power, a0]; rw limit_rec_on_limit _ _ _ _ h; refl
theorem power_le_of_limit {a b c : ordinal} (a0 : a ≠ 0) (h : is_limit b) :
a ^ b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a ^ b' ≤ c :=
by rw [power_limit a0 h, bsup_le]
theorem lt_power_of_limit {a b c : ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (h : is_limit c) :
a < b ^ c ↔ ∃ c' < c, a < b ^ c' :=
by rw [← not_iff_not, not_exists]; simp [power_le_of_limit b0 h]
@[simp] theorem power_one (a : ordinal) : a ^ 1 = a :=
by rw [← succ_zero, power_succ]; simp
@[simp] theorem one_power (a : ordinal) : 1 ^ a = 1 :=
begin
apply limit_rec_on a, {simp}, {simp},
refine λ b l IH, eq_of_forall_ge_iff (λ c, _),
rw [power_le_of_limit one_ne_zero l],
exact ⟨λ H, by simpa using H 0 l.pos,
λ H b' h, by rwa IH _ h⟩,
end
theorem power_pos {a : ordinal} (b)
(a0 : 0 < a) : 0 < a ^ b :=
begin
have h0 : 0 < a ^ 0, {simp [zero_lt_one]},
apply limit_rec_on b,
{ exact h0 },
{ intros b IH, rw [power_succ],
exact mul_pos IH a0 },
{ exact λ b l _, (lt_power_of_limit (pos_iff_ne_zero.1 a0) l).2
⟨0, l.pos, h0⟩ },
end
theorem power_ne_zero {a : ordinal} (b)
(a0 : a ≠ 0) : a ^ b ≠ 0 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.1 $ power_pos b $ pos_iff_ne_zero.2 a0
theorem power_is_normal {a : ordinal} (h : 1 < a) : is_normal ((^) a) :=
have a0 : 0 < a, from lt_trans zero_lt_one h,
⟨λ b, by simpa using
(mul_lt_mul_iff_left (power_pos b a0)).2 h,
λ b l c, power_le_of_limit (ne_of_gt a0) l⟩
theorem power_lt_power_iff_right {a b c : ordinal}
(a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b < a ^ c ↔ b < c :=
(power_is_normal a1).lt_iff
theorem power_le_power_iff_right {a b c : ordinal}
(a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b ≤ a ^ c ↔ b ≤ c :=
(power_is_normal a1).le_iff
theorem power_right_inj {a b c : ordinal}
(a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b = a ^ c ↔ b = c :=
(power_is_normal a1).inj
theorem power_is_limit {a b : ordinal}
(a1 : 1 < a) : is_limit b → is_limit (a ^ b) :=
(power_is_normal a1).is_limit
theorem power_is_limit_left {a b : ordinal}
(l : is_limit a) (hb : b ≠ 0) : is_limit (a ^ b) :=
begin
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with e|⟨b,rfl⟩|l',
{ exact absurd e hb },
{ rw power_succ,
exact mul_is_limit (power_pos _ l.pos) l },
{ exact power_is_limit l.one_lt l' }
end
theorem power_le_power_right {a b c : ordinal}
(h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : b ≤ c) : a ^ b ≤ a ^ c :=
begin
cases lt_or_eq_of_le (one_le_iff_pos.2 h₁) with h₁ h₁,
{ exact (power_le_power_iff_right h₁).2 h₂ },
{ subst a, simp }
end
theorem power_le_power_left {a b : ordinal} (c)
(ab : a ≤ b) : a ^ c ≤ b ^ c :=
begin
by_cases a0 : a = 0,
{ subst a, by_cases c0 : c = 0,
{ subst c, simp },
{ simp [c0, zero_le] } },
{ apply limit_rec_on c,
{ simp },
{ intros c IH, simpa using mul_le_mul IH ab },
{ exact λ c l IH, (power_le_of_limit a0 l).2
(λ b' h, le_trans (IH _ h) (power_le_power_right
(lt_of_lt_of_le (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 a0) ab) (le_of_lt h))) } }
end
theorem le_power_self {a : ordinal} (b) (a1 : 1 < a) : b ≤ a ^ b :=
(power_is_normal a1).le_self _
theorem power_lt_power_left_of_succ {a b c : ordinal}
(ab : a < b) : a ^ succ c < b ^ succ c :=
by rw [power_succ, power_succ]; exact
lt_of_le_of_lt
(mul_le_mul_right _ $ power_le_power_left _ $ le_of_lt ab)
(mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left ab (power_pos _ (lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le _) ab)))
theorem power_add (a b c : ordinal) : a ^ (b + c) = a ^ b * a ^ c :=
begin
by_cases a0 : a = 0,
{ subst a,
by_cases c0 : c = 0, {simp [c0]},
have : b+c ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt (lt_of_lt_of_le
(pos_iff_ne_zero.2 c0) (le_add_left _ _)),
simp [c0, this] },
cases eq_or_lt_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 a0) with a1 a1,
{ subst a1, simp },
apply limit_rec_on c,
{ simp },
{ intros c IH,
rw [add_succ, power_succ, IH, power_succ, mul_assoc] },
{ intros c l IH,
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff (λ d, (((power_is_normal a1).trans
(add_is_normal b)).limit_le l).trans _),
simp [IH] {contextual := tt},
exact (((mul_is_normal $ power_pos b (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 a0)).trans
(power_is_normal a1)).limit_le l).symm }
end
theorem power_dvd_power (a) {b c : ordinal}
(h : b ≤ c) : a ^ b ∣ a ^ c :=
by rw [← add_sub_cancel_of_le h, power_add]; apply dvd_mul
theorem power_dvd_power_iff {a b c : ordinal}
(a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b ∣ a ^ c ↔ b ≤ c :=
⟨λ h, le_of_not_lt $ λ hn,
not_le_of_lt ((power_lt_power_iff_right a1).2 hn) $
le_of_dvd (power_ne_zero _ $ one_le_iff_ne_zero.1 $ le_of_lt a1) h,
power_dvd_power _⟩
theorem power_mul (a b c : ordinal) : a ^ (b * c) = (a ^ b) ^ c :=
begin
by_cases b0 : b = 0, {simp [b0]},
by_cases a0 : a = 0,
{ subst a,
by_cases c0 : c = 0, {simp [c0]},
simp [b0, c0, mul_ne_zero b0 c0] },
cases eq_or_lt_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 a0) with a1 a1,
{ subst a1, simp },
apply limit_rec_on c,
{ simp },
{ intros c IH,
rw [mul_succ, power_add, IH, power_succ] },
{ intros c l IH,
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff (λ d, (((power_is_normal a1).trans
(mul_is_normal (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 b0))).limit_le l).trans _),
simp [IH] {contextual := tt},
exact (power_le_of_limit (power_ne_zero _ a0) l).symm }
end
/-- The ordinal logarithm is the solution `u` to the equation
`x = b ^ u * v + w` where `v < b` and `w < b`. -/
def log (b : ordinal) (x : ordinal) : ordinal :=
if h : 1 < b then pred $
omin {o | x < b^o} ⟨succ x, succ_le.1 (le_power_self _ h)⟩
else 0
@[simp] theorem log_not_one_lt {b : ordinal} (b1 : ¬ 1 < b) (x : ordinal) : log b x = 0 :=
by simp [log, b1]
theorem log_def {b : ordinal} (b1 : 1 < b) (x : ordinal) : log b x =
pred (omin {o | x < b^o} (log._proof_1 b x b1)) :=
by simp [log, b1]
@[simp] theorem log_zero (b : ordinal) : log b 0 = 0 :=
if b1 : 1 < b then
by rw [log_def b1, ← le_zero, pred_le];
apply omin_le; simp [lt_trans zero_lt_one b1]
else by simp [b1]
theorem succ_log_def {b x : ordinal} (b1 : 1 < b) (x0 : 0 < x) : succ (log b x) =
omin {o | x < b^o} (log._proof_1 b x b1) :=
begin
let t := omin {o | x < b^o} (log._proof_1 b x b1),
have : x < b ^ t := omin_mem {o | x < b^o} _,
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit t with h|h|h,
{ refine (not_lt_of_le (one_le_iff_pos.2 x0) _).elim,
simpa [h] },
{ rw [show log b x = pred t, from log_def b1 x,
succ_pred_iff_is_succ.2 h] },
{ rcases (lt_power_of_limit (ne_of_gt $ lt_trans zero_lt_one b1) h).1 this with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩,
exact (not_le_of_lt h₁).elim (le_omin.1 (le_refl t) a h₂) }
end
theorem lt_power_succ_log {b : ordinal} (b1 : 1 < b) (x : ordinal) :
x < b ^ succ (log b x) :=
begin
cases lt_or_eq_of_le (zero_le x) with x0 x0,
{ rw [succ_log_def b1 x0], exact omin_mem {o | x < b^o} _ },
{ subst x, apply power_pos _ (lt_trans zero_lt_one b1) }
end
theorem power_log_le (b) {x : ordinal} (x0 : 0 < x) :
b ^ log b x ≤ x :=
begin
by_cases b0 : b = 0,
{ rw [b0, zero_power'],
refine le_trans (sub_le_self _ _) (one_le_iff_pos.2 x0) },
cases lt_or_eq_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 b0) with b1 b1,
{ refine le_of_not_lt (λ h, not_le_of_lt (lt_succ_self (log b x)) _),
have := @omin_le {o | x < b^o} _ _ h,
rwa ← succ_log_def b1 x0 at this },
{ rw [← b1, one_power], exact one_le_iff_pos.2 x0 }
end
theorem le_log {b x c : ordinal} (b1 : 1 < b) (x0 : 0 < x) :
c ≤ log b x ↔ b ^ c ≤ x :=
⟨λ h, le_trans ((power_le_power_iff_right b1).2 h) (power_log_le b x0),
λ h, le_of_not_lt $ λ hn,
not_le_of_lt (lt_power_succ_log b1 x) $
le_trans ((power_le_power_iff_right b1).2 (succ_le.2 hn)) h⟩
theorem log_lt {b x c : ordinal} (b1 : 1 < b) (x0 : 0 < x) :
log b x < c ↔ x < b ^ c :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.1 (le_log b1 x0)
theorem log_le_log (b) {x y : ordinal} (xy : x ≤ y) :
log b x ≤ log b y :=
if x0 : x = 0 then by simp [x0, zero_le] else
have x0 : 0 < x, from pos_iff_ne_zero.2 x0,
if b1 : 1 < b then
(le_log b1 (lt_of_lt_of_le x0 xy)).2 $ le_trans (power_log_le _ x0) xy
else by simp [b1, zero_le]
theorem log_le_self (b x : ordinal) : log b x ≤ x :=
if x0 : x = 0 then by simp [x0, zero_le] else
if b1 : 1 < b then
le_trans (le_power_self _ b1) (power_log_le b (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 x0))
else by simp [b1, zero_le]
@[simp] theorem nat_cast_mul {m n : ℕ} : ((m * n : ℕ) : ordinal) = m * n :=
by induction n with n IH; [simp, rw [nat.mul_succ,
nat.cast_add, IH, nat.cast_succ, mul_add_one]]
@[simp] theorem nat_cast_power {m n : ℕ} : ((pow m n : ℕ) : ordinal) = m ^ n :=
by induction n with n IH; [simp, rw [nat.pow_succ,
nat_cast_mul, IH, nat.cast_succ, ← succ_eq_add_one, power_succ]]
@[simp] theorem nat_cast_le {m n : ℕ} : (m : ordinal) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n :=
by rw [← cardinal.ord_nat, ← cardinal.ord_nat,
cardinal.ord_le_ord, cardinal.nat_cast_le]
@[simp] theorem nat_cast_lt {m n : ℕ} : (m : ordinal) < n ↔ m < n :=
by simp [lt_iff_le_not_le, -not_le]
@[simp] theorem nat_cast_inj {m n : ℕ} : (m : ordinal) = n ↔ m = n :=
by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
@[simp] theorem nat_cast_eq_zero {n : ℕ} : (n : ordinal) = 0 ↔ n = 0 :=
@nat_cast_inj n 0
@[simp] theorem nat_cast_ne_zero {n : ℕ} : (n : ordinal) ≠ 0 ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
not_congr nat_cast_eq_zero
@[simp] theorem nat_cast_pos {n : ℕ} : (0 : ordinal) < n ↔ 0 < n :=
by simpa using @nat_cast_lt 0 n
@[simp] theorem nat_cast_sub {m n : ℕ} : ((m - n : ℕ) : ordinal) = m - n :=
(_root_.le_total m n).elim
(λ h, by rw [nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 h, sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 (nat_cast_le.2 h)]; refl)
(λ h, (add_left_cancel n).1 $ by rw [← nat.cast_add,
nat.add_sub_cancel' h, add_sub_cancel_of_le (nat_cast_le.2 h)])
@[simp] theorem nat_cast_div {m n : ℕ} : ((m / n : ℕ) : ordinal) = m / n :=
if n0 : n = 0 then by simp [n0] else
have n0':_, from nat_cast_ne_zero.2 n0,
le_antisymm
(by rw [le_div n0', ← nat_cast_mul, nat_cast_le, mul_comm];
apply nat.div_mul_le_self)
(by rw [div_le n0', succ, ← nat.cast_succ, ← nat_cast_mul,
nat_cast_lt, mul_comm, ← nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul _ _ (nat.pos_of_ne_zero n0)];
apply nat.lt_succ_self)
@[simp] theorem nat_cast_mod {m n : ℕ} : ((m % n : ℕ) : ordinal) = m % n :=
by rw [← add_left_cancel (n*(m/n)), div_add_mod, ← nat_cast_div, ← nat_cast_mul, ← nat.cast_add,
add_comm, nat.mod_add_div]
@[simp] theorem nat_le_card {o} {n : ℕ} : (n : cardinal) ≤ card o ↔ (n : ordinal) ≤ o :=
⟨λ h, by rwa [← cardinal.ord_le, cardinal.ord_nat] at h,
λ h, card_nat n ▸ card_le_card h⟩
@[simp] theorem nat_lt_card {o} {n : ℕ} : (n : cardinal) < card o ↔ (n : ordinal) < o :=
by rw [← succ_le, ← cardinal.succ_le, cardinal.nat_succ, nat_le_card]; refl
@[simp] theorem card_lt_nat {o} {n : ℕ} : card o < n ↔ o < n :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.1 nat_le_card
@[simp] theorem card_le_nat {o} {n : ℕ} : card o ≤ n ↔ o ≤ n :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 nat_lt_card
@[simp] theorem card_eq_nat {o} {n : ℕ} : card o = n ↔ o = n :=
by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
@[simp] theorem type_fin (n : ℕ) : @type (fin n) (<) _ = n :=
by rw [← card_eq_nat, card_type, mk_fin]
@[simp] theorem lift_nat_cast (n : ℕ) : lift n = n :=
by induction n; simp *
theorem lift_type_fin (n : ℕ) : lift (@type (fin n) (<) _) = n := by simp
theorem fintype_card (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] [fintype α] : type r = fintype.card α :=
by rw [← card_eq_nat, card_type, fintype_card]
end ordinal
namespace cardinal
open ordinal
@[simp] theorem ord_omega : ord.{u} omega = ordinal.omega :=
le_antisymm (ord_le.2 $ le_refl _) $
le_of_forall_lt $ λ o h, begin
rcases ordinal.lt_lift_iff.1 h with ⟨o, rfl, h'⟩,
rw [lt_ord, ← lift_card, ← lift_omega.{0 u},
lift_lt, ← typein_enum (<) h'],
exact lt_omega_iff_fintype.2 ⟨set.fintype_lt_nat _⟩
end
@[simp] theorem add_one_of_omega_le {c} (h : omega ≤ c) : c + 1 = c :=
by rw [add_comm, ← card_ord c, ← card_one,
← card_add, one_add_of_omega_le];
rwa [← ord_omega, ord_le_ord]
end cardinal
namespace ordinal
theorem lt_omega {o : ordinal.{u}} : o < omega ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, o = n :=
by rw [← cardinal.ord_omega, cardinal.lt_ord, lt_omega]; simp
theorem nat_lt_omega (n : ℕ) : (n : ordinal) < omega :=
lt_omega.2 ⟨_, rfl⟩
theorem omega_pos : 0 < omega := nat_lt_omega 0
theorem omega_ne_zero : omega ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt omega_pos
theorem one_lt_omega : 1 < omega := by simpa using nat_lt_omega 1
theorem omega_is_limit : is_limit omega :=
⟨omega_ne_zero, λ o h,
let ⟨n, e⟩ := lt_omega.1 h in
by rw [e]; exact nat_lt_omega (n+1)⟩
theorem omega_le {o : ordinal.{u}} : omega ≤ o ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, (n : ordinal) ≤ o :=
⟨λ h n, le_trans (le_of_lt (nat_lt_omega _)) h,
λ H, le_of_forall_lt $ λ a h,
let ⟨n, e⟩ := lt_omega.1 h in
by rw [e, ← succ_le]; exact H (n+1)⟩
theorem nat_lt_limit {o} (h : is_limit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, (n : ordinal) < o
| 0 := lt_of_le_of_ne (zero_le o) h.1.symm
| (n+1) := h.2 _ (nat_lt_limit n)
theorem omega_le_of_is_limit {o} (h : is_limit o) : omega ≤ o :=
omega_le.2 $ λ n, le_of_lt $ nat_lt_limit h n
theorem add_omega {a : ordinal} (h : a < omega) : a + omega = omega :=
by rcases lt_omega.1 h with ⟨n, rfl⟩;
clear h; induction n with n IH; simp *
theorem add_lt_omega {a b : ordinal} (ha : a < omega) (hb : b < omega) : a + b < omega :=
match a, b, lt_omega.1 ha, lt_omega.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ := by rw [← nat.cast_add]; apply nat_lt_omega
end
theorem mul_lt_omega {a b : ordinal} (ha : a < omega) (hb : b < omega) : a * b < omega :=
match a, b, lt_omega.1 ha, lt_omega.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ := by rw [← nat_cast_mul]; apply nat_lt_omega
end
theorem is_limit_iff_omega_dvd {a : ordinal} : is_limit a ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ omega ∣ a :=
begin
refine ⟨λ l, ⟨l.1, ⟨a / omega, le_antisymm _ (mul_div_le _ _)⟩⟩, λ h, _⟩,
{ refine (limit_le l).2 (λ x hx, le_of_lt _),
rw [← div_lt omega_ne_zero, ← succ_le, le_div omega_ne_zero,
mul_succ, add_le_of_limit omega_is_limit],
intros b hb,
rcases lt_omega.1 hb with ⟨n, rfl⟩,
exact le_trans (add_le_add_right (mul_div_le _ _) _)
(le_of_lt $ lt_sub.1 $ nat_lt_limit (sub_is_limit l hx) _) },
{ rcases h with ⟨a0, b, rfl⟩,
refine mul_is_limit_left omega_is_limit
(pos_iff_ne_zero.2 $ mt _ a0),
intro e, simp [e] }
end
local infixr ^ := @pow ordinal ordinal ordinal.has_pow
theorem power_lt_omega {a b : ordinal} (ha : a < omega) (hb : b < omega) : a ^ b < omega :=
match a, b, lt_omega.1 ha, lt_omega.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ := by rw [← nat_cast_power]; apply nat_lt_omega
end
theorem add_omega_power {a b : ordinal} (h : a < omega ^ b) : a + omega ^ b = omega ^ b :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ (le_add_left _ _),
revert h, apply limit_rec_on b,
{ intro h, rw [power_zero, ← succ_zero, lt_succ, le_zero] at h,
simp [h] },
{ intros b _ h, rw [power_succ] at h,
rcases (lt_mul_of_limit omega_is_limit).1 h with ⟨x, xo, ax⟩,
refine le_trans (add_le_add_right (le_of_lt ax) _) _,
rw [power_succ, ← mul_add, add_omega xo] },
{ intros b l IH h, rcases (lt_power_of_limit omega_ne_zero l).1 h with ⟨x, xb, ax⟩,
refine (((add_is_normal a).trans (power_is_normal one_lt_omega))
.limit_le l).2 (λ y yb, _),
let z := max x y,
have := IH z (max_lt xb yb)
(lt_of_lt_of_le ax $ power_le_power_right omega_pos (le_max_left _ _)),
exact le_trans (add_le_add_left (power_le_power_right omega_pos (le_max_right _ _)) _)
(le_trans this (power_le_power_right omega_pos $ le_of_lt $ max_lt xb yb)) }
end
theorem add_lt_omega_power {a b c : ordinal} (h₁ : a < omega ^ c) (h₂ : b < omega ^ c) :
a + b < omega ^ c :=
by rwa [← add_omega_power h₁, add_lt_add_iff_left]
theorem add_absorp {a b c : ordinal} (h₁ : a < omega ^ b) (h₂ : omega ^ b ≤ c) : a + c = c :=
by rw [← add_sub_cancel_of_le h₂, ← add_assoc, add_omega_power h₁]
theorem add_absorp_iff {o : ordinal} (o0 : o > 0) : (∀ a < o, a + o = o) ↔ ∃ a, o = omega ^ a :=
⟨λ H, ⟨log omega o, begin
refine ((lt_or_eq_of_le (power_log_le _ o0))
.resolve_left $ λ h, _).symm,
have := H _ h,
have := lt_power_succ_log one_lt_omega o,
rw [power_succ, lt_mul_of_limit omega_is_limit] at this,
rcases this with ⟨a, ao, h'⟩,
rcases lt_omega.1 ao with ⟨n, rfl⟩, clear ao,
revert h', apply not_lt_of_le,
suffices e : omega ^ log omega o * ↑n + o = o,
{ simpa [e] using le_add_right (omega ^ log omega o * ↑n) o },
induction n with n IH, {simp},
simp [mul_add_one, this, IH]
end⟩,
λ ⟨b, e⟩, e.symm ▸ λ a, add_omega_power⟩
theorem add_mul_limit_aux {a b c : ordinal} (ba : b + a = a)
(l : is_limit c)
(IH : ∀ c' < c, (a + b) * succ c' = a * succ c' + b) :
(a + b) * c = a * c :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_of_limit l).2 $ λ c' h, begin
apply le_trans (mul_le_mul_left _ (le_of_lt $ lt_succ_self _)),
rw IH _ h,
apply le_trans (add_le_add_left _ _),
{ rw ← mul_succ, exact mul_le_mul_left _ (succ_le.2 $ l.2 _ h) },
{ rw ← ba, exact le_add_right _ _ }
end)
(mul_le_mul_right _ (le_add_right _ _))
theorem add_mul_succ {a b : ordinal} (c) (ba : b + a = a) :
(a + b) * succ c = a * succ c + b :=
begin
apply limit_rec_on c,
{ simp },
{ intros c IH,
rw [mul_succ, IH, ← add_assoc, add_assoc _ b, ba, ← mul_succ] },
{ intros c l IH,
have := add_mul_limit_aux ba l IH,
rw [mul_succ, add_mul_limit_aux ba l IH, mul_succ, add_assoc] }
end
theorem add_mul_limit {a b c : ordinal} (ba : b + a = a)
(l : is_limit c) : (a + b) * c = a * c :=
add_mul_limit_aux ba l (λ c' _, add_mul_succ c' ba)
theorem mul_omega {a : ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) (ha : a < omega) : a * omega = omega :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_of_limit omega_is_limit).2 $ λ b hb, le_of_lt (mul_lt_omega ha hb))
(by simpa using mul_le_mul_right omega (one_le_iff_pos.2 a0))
theorem mul_lt_omega_power {a b c : ordinal}
(c0 : 0 < c) (ha : a < omega ^ c) (hb : b < omega) : a * b < omega ^ c :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp [b0, power_pos _ omega_pos] else begin
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit c with rfl|⟨c,rfl⟩|l,
{ exact (lt_irrefl _).elim c0 },
{ rw power_succ at ha,
rcases ((mul_is_normal $ power_pos _ omega_pos).limit_lt
omega_is_limit).1 ha with ⟨n, hn, an⟩,
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (mul_le_mul_right _ (le_of_lt an)) _,
rw [power_succ, mul_assoc, mul_lt_mul_iff_left (power_pos _ omega_pos)],
exact mul_lt_omega hn hb },
{ rcases ((power_is_normal one_lt_omega).limit_lt l).1 ha with ⟨x, hx, ax⟩,
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (mul_le_mul (le_of_lt ax) (le_of_lt hb)) _,
rw [← power_succ, power_lt_power_iff_right one_lt_omega],
exact l.2 _ hx }
end
theorem mul_omega_dvd {a : ordinal}
(a0 : 0 < a) (ha : a < omega) : ∀ {b}, omega ∣ b → a * b = b
| _ ⟨b, rfl⟩ := by rw [← mul_assoc, mul_omega a0 ha]
theorem mul_omega_power_power {a b : ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) (h : a < omega ^ omega ^ b) :
a * omega ^ omega ^ b = omega ^ omega ^ b :=
begin
by_cases b0 : b = 0, {simp [b0] at h ⊢, simp [mul_omega a0 h]},
refine le_antisymm _ (by simpa using mul_le_mul_right (omega^omega^b) (one_le_iff_pos.2 a0)),
rcases (lt_power_of_limit omega_ne_zero (power_is_limit_left omega_is_limit b0)).1 h
with ⟨x, xb, ax⟩,
refine le_trans (mul_le_mul_right _ (le_of_lt ax)) _,
rw [← power_add, add_omega_power xb]
end
theorem power_omega {a : ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) (h : a < omega) : a ^ omega = omega :=
le_antisymm
((power_le_of_limit (one_le_iff_ne_zero.1 $ le_of_lt a1) omega_is_limit).2
(λ b hb, le_of_lt (power_lt_omega h hb)))
(le_power_self _ a1)
theorem CNF_aux {b o : ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (o0 : o ≠ 0) :
o % b ^ log b o < o :=
lt_of_lt_of_le
(mod_lt _ $ power_ne_zero _ b0)
(power_log_le _ $ pos_iff_ne_zero.2 o0)
@[elab_as_eliminator] noncomputable def CNF_rec {b : ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0)
{C : ordinal → Sort*}
(H0 : C 0)
(H : ∀ o, o ≠ 0 → o % b ^ log b o < o → C (o % b ^ log b o) → C o)
: ∀ o, C o
| o :=
if o0 : o = 0 then by rw o0; exact H0 else
have _, from CNF_aux b0 o0,
H o o0 this (CNF_rec (o % b ^ log b o))
using_well_founded {dec_tac := `[assumption]}
@[simp] theorem CNF_rec_zero {b} (b0) {C H0 H} : @CNF_rec b b0 C H0 H 0 = H0 :=
by rw CNF_rec; simp; refl
@[simp] theorem CNF_rec_ne_zero {b} (b0) {C H0 H o} (o0) :
@CNF_rec b b0 C H0 H o = H o o0 (CNF_aux b0 o0) (@CNF_rec b b0 C H0 H _) :=
by rw CNF_rec; simp [o0]
/-- The Cantor normal form of an ordinal is the list of coefficients
in the base-`b` expansion of `o`.
CNF b (b ^ u₁ * v₁ + b ^ u₂ * v₂) = [(u₁, v₁), (u₂, v₂)] -/
def CNF (b := omega) (o : ordinal) : list (ordinal × ordinal) :=
if b0 : b = 0 then [] else
CNF_rec b0 [] (λ o o0 h IH, (log b o, o / b ^ log b o) :: IH) o
@[simp] theorem zero_CNF (o) : CNF 0 o = [] :=
by rw CNF; simp
@[simp] theorem CNF_zero (b) : CNF b 0 = [] :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp [b0] else
by simp [CNF, b0]
theorem CNF_ne_zero {b o : ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (o0 : o ≠ 0) :
CNF b o = (log b o, o / b ^ log b o) :: CNF b (o % b ^ log b o) :=
by simp [CNF, b0, o0]
theorem one_CNF {o : ordinal} (o0 : o ≠ 0) :
CNF 1 o = [(0, o)] :=
by rw [CNF_ne_zero one_ne_zero o0]; simp
theorem CNF_foldr {b : ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (o) :
(CNF b o).foldr (λ p r, b ^ p.1 * p.2 + r) 0 = o :=
CNF_rec b0 (by simp)
(λ o o0 h IH, by simp [CNF_ne_zero b0 o0, IH, div_add_mod]) o
theorem CNF_pairwise_aux (b := omega) (o) :
(∀ p ∈ CNF b o, prod.fst p ≤ log b o) ∧
(CNF b o).pairwise (λ p q, q.1 < p.1) :=
begin
by_cases b0 : b = 0, {simp [b0]},
cases lt_or_eq_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 b0) with b1 b1,
{ refine CNF_rec b0 (by simp) _ o,
intros o o0 H IH, cases IH with IH₁ IH₂,
simp [CNF_ne_zero b0 o0, IH₁, IH₂, -prod.forall],
refine ⟨⟨le_refl _, λ p m, _⟩, λ p m, _⟩,
{ exact le_trans (IH₁ p m) (log_le_log _ $ le_of_lt H) },
{ refine lt_of_le_of_lt (IH₁ p m) ((log_lt b1 _).2 _),
{ rw pos_iff_ne_zero, intro e,
rw e at m, simpa using m },
{ exact mod_lt _ (power_ne_zero _ b0) } } },
{ by_cases o0 : o = 0, {simp [o0]},
rw [← b1, one_CNF o0], simp }
end
theorem CNF_pairwise (b := omega) (o) :
(CNF b o).pairwise (λ p q, prod.fst q < p.1) :=
(CNF_pairwise_aux _ _).2
theorem CNF_fst_le_log (b := omega) (o) :
∀ p ∈ CNF b o, prod.fst p ≤ log b o :=
(CNF_pairwise_aux _ _).1
theorem CNF_fst_le (b := omega) (o) (p ∈ CNF b o) : prod.fst p ≤ o :=
le_trans (CNF_fst_le_log _ _ p H) (log_le_self _ _)
theorem CNF_snd_lt {b : ordinal} (b1 : 1 < b) (o) :
∀ p ∈ CNF b o, prod.snd p < b :=
begin
have b0 := ne_of_gt (lt_trans zero_lt_one b1),
refine CNF_rec b0 (by simp) _ o,
intros o o0 H IH,
simp [CNF_ne_zero b0 o0, iff_true_intro IH, -prod.forall],
rw [div_lt (power_ne_zero _ b0), ← power_succ],
exact lt_power_succ_log b1 _,
end
theorem CNF_sorted (b := omega) (o) :
((CNF b o).map prod.fst).sorted (>) :=
by rw [list.sorted, list.pairwise_map]; exact CNF_pairwise b o
/-- The next fixed point function, the least fixed point of the
normal function `f` above `a`. -/
def nfp (f : ordinal → ordinal) (a : ordinal) :=
sup (λ n : ℕ, f^[n] a)
theorem iterate_le_nfp (f a n) : f^[n] a ≤ nfp f a :=
le_sup _ n
theorem le_nfp_self (f a) : a ≤ nfp f a :=
iterate_le_nfp f a 0
theorem is_normal.lt_nfp {f} (H : is_normal f) {a b} :
f b < nfp f a ↔ b < nfp f a :=
lt_sup.trans $ iff.trans
(by exact
⟨λ ⟨n, h⟩, ⟨n, lt_of_le_of_lt (H.le_self _) h⟩,
λ ⟨n, h⟩, ⟨n+1, by rw nat.iterate_succ'; exact H.lt_iff.2 h⟩⟩)
lt_sup.symm
theorem is_normal.nfp_le {f} (H : is_normal f) {a b} :
nfp f a ≤ f b ↔ nfp f a ≤ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 H.lt_nfp
theorem is_normal.nfp_le_fp {f} (H : is_normal f) {a b}
(ab : a ≤ b) (h : f b ≤ b) : nfp f a ≤ b :=
sup_le.2 $ λ i, begin
induction i with i IH generalizing a, {exact ab},
exact IH (le_trans (H.le_iff.2 ab) h),
end
theorem is_normal.nfp_fp {f} (H : is_normal f) (a) : f (nfp f a) = nfp f a :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ (H.le_self _),
cases le_or_lt (f a) a with aa aa,
{ rwa le_antisymm (H.nfp_le_fp (le_refl _) aa) (le_nfp_self _ _) },
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit (nfp f a) with e|⟨b, e⟩|l,
{ refine @le_trans _ _ _ (f a) _ (H.le_iff.2 _) (iterate_le_nfp f a 1),
simp [e, zero_le] },
{ have : f b < nfp f a := H.lt_nfp.2 (by simp [e, lt_succ_self]),
rw [e, lt_succ] at this,
have ab : a ≤ b,
{ rw [← lt_succ, ← e],
exact lt_of_lt_of_le aa (iterate_le_nfp f a 1) },
refine le_trans (H.le_iff.2 (H.nfp_le_fp ab this))
(le_trans this (le_of_lt _)),
simp [e, lt_succ_self] },
{ exact (H.2 _ l _).2 (λ b h, le_of_lt (H.lt_nfp.2 h)) }
end
theorem is_normal.le_nfp {f} (H : is_normal f) {a b} :
f b ≤ nfp f a ↔ b ≤ nfp f a :=
⟨le_trans (H.le_self _), λ h,
by simpa [H.nfp_fp] using H.le_iff.2 h⟩
/-- The derivative of a normal function `f` is
the sequence of fixed points of `f`. -/
def deriv (f : ordinal → ordinal) (o : ordinal) : ordinal :=
limit_rec_on o (nfp f 0)
(λ a IH, nfp f (succ IH))
(λ a l, bsup.{u u} a)
@[simp] theorem deriv_zero (f) : deriv f 0 = nfp f 0 := limit_rec_on_zero _ _ _
@[simp] theorem deriv_succ (f o) : deriv f (succ o) = nfp f (succ (deriv f o)) :=
limit_rec_on_succ _ _ _ _
theorem deriv_limit (f) {o} : is_limit o →
deriv f o = bsup.{u u} o (λ a _, deriv f a) :=
limit_rec_on_limit _ _ _ _
theorem deriv_is_normal (f) : is_normal (deriv f) :=
⟨λ o, by rw [deriv_succ, ← succ_le]; apply le_nfp_self,
λ o l a, by rw [deriv_limit _ l, bsup_le]⟩
theorem is_normal.deriv_fp {f} (H : is_normal f) (o) : f (deriv.{u} f o) = deriv f o :=
begin
apply limit_rec_on o; try {simp [H.nfp_fp]},
intros o l IH,
rw [deriv_limit _ l, is_normal.bsup.{u u u} H _ l.1],
apply eq_of_forall_ge_iff,
simp [bsup_le, IH] {contextual := tt}
end
theorem is_normal.fp_iff_deriv {f} (H : is_normal f)
{a} : f a ≤ a ↔ ∃ o, a = deriv f o :=
⟨λ ha, begin
suffices : ∀ o (_:a ≤ deriv f o), ∃ o, a = deriv f o,
from this a ((deriv_is_normal _).le_self _),
intro o, apply limit_rec_on o,
{ intros h₁,
refine ⟨0, le_antisymm h₁ _⟩,
rw deriv_zero,
exact H.nfp_le_fp (zero_le _) ha },
{ intros o IH h₁,
cases le_or_lt a (deriv f o), {exact IH h},
refine ⟨succ o, le_antisymm h₁ _⟩,
rw deriv_succ,
exact H.nfp_le_fp (succ_le.2 h) ha },
{ intros o l IH h₁,
cases eq_or_lt_of_le h₁, {exact ⟨_, h⟩},
rw [deriv_limit _ l, ← not_le, bsup_le, not_ball] at h,
exact let ⟨o', h, hl⟩ := h in IH o' h (le_of_not_le hl) }
end, λ ⟨o, e⟩, e.symm ▸ le_of_eq (H.deriv_fp _)⟩
end ordinal
namespace cardinal
open ordinal
theorem ord_is_limit {c} (co : omega ≤ c) : (ord c).is_limit :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, omega_ne_zero _, λ a, le_imp_le_iff_lt_imp_lt.1 _⟩,
{ rw [← ordinal.le_zero, ord_le] at h,
simpa [le_zero] using le_trans co h },
{ intro h, rw [ord_le] at h ⊢,
rwa [← @add_one_of_omega_le (card a), ← card_succ],
rw [← ord_le, ← le_succ_of_is_limit, ord_le],
{ exact le_trans co h },
{ rw ord_omega, exact omega_is_limit } }
end
def aleph_idx.initial_seg : @initial_seg cardinal ordinal (<) (<) :=
@order_embedding.collapse cardinal ordinal (<) (<) _ cardinal.ord.order_embedding
/-- The `aleph'` index function, which gives the ordinal index of a cardinal.
(The `aleph'` part is because unlike `aleph` this counts also the
finite stages. So `aleph_idx n = n`, `aleph_idx ω = ω`,
`aleph_idx ℵ₁ = ω + 1` and so on.) -/
def aleph_idx : cardinal → ordinal := aleph_idx.initial_seg
@[simp] theorem aleph_idx.initial_seg_coe :
(aleph_idx.initial_seg : cardinal → ordinal) = aleph_idx := rfl
@[simp] theorem aleph_idx_lt {a b} : aleph_idx a < aleph_idx b ↔ a < b :=
aleph_idx.initial_seg.to_order_embedding.ord'.symm
@[simp] theorem aleph_idx_le {a b} : aleph_idx a ≤ aleph_idx b ↔ a ≤ b :=
by rw [← not_lt, ← not_lt, aleph_idx_lt]
theorem aleph_idx.init {a b} : b < aleph_idx a → ∃ c, aleph_idx c = b :=
aleph_idx.initial_seg.init _ _
def aleph_idx.order_iso : @order_iso cardinal.{u} ordinal.{u} (<) (<) :=
@order_iso.of_surjective cardinal.{u} ordinal.{u} (<) (<) aleph_idx.initial_seg.{u} $
(initial_seg.eq_or_principal aleph_idx.initial_seg.{u}).resolve_right $
λ ⟨o, e⟩, begin
have : ∀ c, aleph_idx c < o := λ c, (e _).2 ⟨_, rfl⟩,
refine ordinal.induction_on o _ this, introsI α r _ h,
let s := sup.{u u} (λ a:α, inv_fun aleph_idx (ordinal.typein r a)),
apply not_le_of_gt (lt_succ_self s),
have I : injective aleph_idx := aleph_idx.initial_seg.to_embedding.inj,
simpa [left_inverse_inv_fun I (succ s)] using
le_sup.{u u} (λ a, inv_fun aleph_idx (ordinal.typein r a))
(ordinal.enum r _ (h (succ s))),
end
@[simp] theorem aleph_idx.order_iso_coe :
(aleph_idx.order_iso : cardinal → ordinal) = aleph_idx :=
by delta aleph_idx.order_iso; simp
@[simp] theorem type_cardinal : @ordinal.type cardinal (<) _ = ordinal.univ.{u (u+1)} :=
by rw ordinal.univ_id; exact quotient.sound ⟨aleph_idx.order_iso⟩
@[simp] theorem mk_cardinal : mk cardinal = univ.{u (u+1)} :=
by simpa [-type_cardinal] using congr_arg card type_cardinal
def aleph'.order_iso := cardinal.aleph_idx.order_iso.symm
/-- The `aleph'` function gives the cardinals listed by their ordinal
index, and is the inverse of `aleph_idx`.
`aleph' n = n`, `aleph' ω = ω`, `aleph' (ω + 1) = ℵ₁, etc. -/
def aleph' : ordinal → cardinal := aleph'.order_iso
@[simp] theorem aleph'.order_iso_coe :
(aleph'.order_iso : ordinal → cardinal) = aleph' := rfl
@[simp] theorem aleph'_lt {o₁ o₂ : ordinal.{u}} : aleph' o₁ < aleph' o₂ ↔ o₁ < o₂ :=
aleph'.order_iso.ord'.symm
@[simp] theorem aleph'_le {o₁ o₂ : ordinal.{u}} : aleph' o₁ ≤ aleph' o₂ ↔ o₁ ≤ o₂ :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 aleph'_lt
@[simp] theorem aleph'_aleph_idx (c : cardinal.{u}) : aleph' c.aleph_idx = c :=
by simpa using cardinal.aleph_idx.order_iso.to_equiv.inverse_apply_apply c
@[simp] theorem aleph_idx_aleph' (o : ordinal.{u}) : (aleph' o).aleph_idx = o :=
by simpa using cardinal.aleph_idx.order_iso.to_equiv.apply_inverse_apply o
@[simp] theorem aleph'_zero : aleph' 0 = 0 :=
by rw [← le_zero, ← aleph'_aleph_idx 0, aleph'_le];
apply ordinal.zero_le
@[simp] theorem aleph'_succ {o : ordinal.{u}} : aleph' o.succ = (aleph' o).succ :=
le_antisymm
(cardinal.aleph_idx_le.1 $
by rw [aleph_idx_aleph', ordinal.succ_le, ← aleph'_lt, aleph'_aleph_idx];
apply cardinal.lt_succ_self)
(cardinal.succ_le.2 $ aleph'_lt.2 $ ordinal.lt_succ_self _)
@[simp] theorem aleph'_nat : ∀ n : ℕ, aleph' n = n
| 0 := by simp
| (n+1) := show aleph' (ordinal.succ n) = n.succ,
by rw [aleph'_succ, aleph'_nat, nat_succ]
theorem aleph'_le_of_limit {o : ordinal.{u}} (l : o.is_limit) {c} :
aleph' o ≤ c ↔ ∀ o' < o, aleph' o' ≤ c :=
⟨λ h o' h', le_trans (aleph'_le.2 $ le_of_lt h') h,
λ h, begin
rw [← aleph'_aleph_idx c, aleph'_le, ordinal.limit_le l],
intros x h',
rw [← aleph'_le, aleph'_aleph_idx],
exact h _ h'
end⟩
@[simp] theorem aleph'_omega : aleph' ordinal.omega = omega :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ c, begin
simp [aleph'_le_of_limit omega_is_limit, omega_le, ordinal.lt_omega],
exact forall_swap.trans (forall_congr $ λ n, by simp),
end
/-- The `aleph` function gives the infinite cardinals listed by their
ordinal index. `aleph 0 = ω`, `aleph 1 = succ ω` is the first
uncountable cardinal, and so on. -/
def aleph (o : ordinal) : cardinal := aleph' (ordinal.omega + o)
@[simp] theorem aleph_lt {o₁ o₂ : ordinal.{u}} : aleph o₁ < aleph o₂ ↔ o₁ < o₂ :=
aleph'_lt.trans (ordinal.add_lt_add_iff_left _)
@[simp] theorem aleph_le {o₁ o₂ : ordinal.{u}} : aleph o₁ ≤ aleph o₂ ↔ o₁ ≤ o₂ :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 aleph_lt
@[simp] theorem aleph_succ {o : ordinal.{u}} : aleph o.succ = (aleph o).succ :=
by rw [aleph, ordinal.add_succ, aleph'_succ]; refl
@[simp] theorem aleph_zero : aleph 0 = omega := by simp [aleph]
theorem omega_le_aleph' {o : ordinal} : omega ≤ aleph' o ↔ ordinal.omega ≤ o :=
by rw [← aleph'_omega, aleph'_le]
theorem omega_le_aleph (o : ordinal) : omega ≤ aleph o :=
by rw [aleph, omega_le_aleph']; apply ordinal.le_add_right
theorem aleph_is_limit (o : ordinal) : is_limit (aleph o).ord :=
ord_is_limit $ omega_le_aleph _
theorem exists_aleph {c : cardinal} : omega ≤ c ↔ ∃ o, c = aleph o :=
⟨λ h, ⟨aleph_idx c - ordinal.omega,
by rw [aleph, ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le, aleph'_aleph_idx];
rwa [← omega_le_aleph', aleph'_aleph_idx]⟩,
λ ⟨o, e⟩, e.symm ▸ omega_le_aleph _⟩
theorem aleph'_is_normal : is_normal (ord ∘ aleph') :=
⟨λ o, ord_lt_ord.2 $ aleph'_lt.2 $ ordinal.lt_succ_self _,
λ o l a, by simp [ord_le, aleph'_le_of_limit l]⟩
theorem aleph_is_normal : is_normal (ord ∘ aleph) :=
aleph'_is_normal.trans $ add_is_normal ordinal.omega
theorem mul_eq_self {c : cardinal} (h : omega ≤ c) : c * c = c :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _
(by simpa using mul_le_mul_left c (le_trans (le_of_lt one_lt_omega) h)),
refine acc.rec_on (cardinal.wf.apply c) (λ c _,
quotient.induction_on c $ λ α IH ol, _) h,
rcases ord_eq α with ⟨r, wo, e⟩, resetI,
let := decidable_linear_order_of_STO' r,
have : is_well_order α (<) := wo,
let g : α × α → α := λ p, max p.1 p.2,
let f : α × α ↪ ordinal × (α × α) :=
⟨λ p:α×α, (typein (<) (g p), p), λ p q, congr_arg prod.snd⟩,
let s := f ⁻¹'o (prod.lex (<) (prod.lex (<) (<))),
have : is_well_order _ s := (order_embedding.preimage _ _).is_well_order,
suffices : type s ≤ type r, {exact card_le_card this},
refine le_of_forall_lt (λ o h, _),
rcases typein_surj s h with ⟨p, rfl⟩,
rw [← e, lt_ord],
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (_ : _ ≤ card (typein (<) (g p)).succ * card (typein (<) (g p)).succ) _,
{ have : {q|s q p} ⊆ (insert (g p) {x | x < (g p)}).prod (insert (g p) {x | x < (g p)}),
{ intros q h,
simp [s, order.preimage, prod.lex_def, typein_inj] at h,
simpa using max_le_iff.1 (le_iff_lt_or_eq.2 $ h.imp_right and.left) },
suffices H : (insert (g p) {x | r x (g p)} : set α) ≃ ({x | r x (g p)} ⊕ ulift unit),
{ exact ⟨(set.embedding_of_subset this).trans
((equiv.set.prod _ _).trans (H.prod_congr H)).to_embedding⟩ },
refine (equiv.set.insert _).trans
((equiv.refl _).sum_congr (equiv.punit_equiv_punit.trans equiv.ulift.symm)),
apply @irrefl _ r },
cases lt_or_ge (card (typein (<) (g p)).succ) omega with qo qo,
{ exact lt_of_lt_of_le (mul_lt_omega qo qo) ol },
{ suffices, {exact lt_of_le_of_lt (IH _ this qo) this},
rw ← lt_ord, apply (ord_is_limit ol).2,
dsimp, rw e, apply typein_lt_type }
end
theorem mul_eq_max {a b : cardinal} (ha : omega ≤ a) (hb : omega ≤ b) : a * b = max a b :=
le_antisymm
(mul_eq_self (le_trans ha (le_max_left a b)) ▸
mul_le_mul (le_max_left _ _) (le_max_right _ _)) $
max_le
(by simpa using mul_le_mul_left a (le_trans (le_of_lt one_lt_omega) hb))
(by simpa using mul_le_mul_right b (le_trans (le_of_lt one_lt_omega) ha))
theorem add_eq_self {c : cardinal} (h : omega ≤ c) : c + c = c :=
le_antisymm
(by simpa [mul_eq_self h, two_mul] using
mul_le_mul_right c (le_trans (le_of_lt $ nat_lt_omega 2) h))
(le_add_left c c)
theorem add_eq_max {a b : cardinal} (ha : omega ≤ a) : a + b = max a b :=
le_antisymm
(add_eq_self (le_trans ha (le_max_left a b)) ▸
add_le_add (le_max_left _ _) (le_max_right _ _)) $
max_le (le_add_right _ _) (le_add_left _ _)
end cardinal
|
f97ce34469776bc269a76868e41058f43d7590b0 | 94e33a31faa76775069b071adea97e86e218a8ee | /src/algebra/algebra/basic.lean | 61cdbaa5a976d0798aff1bb836fa869418294793 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | urkud/mathlib | eab80095e1b9f1513bfb7f25b4fa82fa4fd02989 | 6379d39e6b5b279df9715f8011369a301b634e41 | refs/heads/master | 1,658,425,342,662 | 1,658,078,703,000 | 1,658,078,703,000 | 186,910,338 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,512,083,000 | 1,557,958,709,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 63,869 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import algebra.module.basic
import algebra.ring.aut
import algebra.ring.ulift
import algebra.module.ulift
import linear_algebra.span
import tactic.abel
/-!
# Algebras over commutative semirings
In this file we define associative unital `algebra`s over commutative (semi)rings, algebra
homomorphisms `alg_hom`, and algebra equivalences `alg_equiv`.
`subalgebra`s are defined in `algebra.algebra.subalgebra`.
For the category of `R`-algebras, denoted `Algebra R`, see the file
`algebra/category/Algebra/basic.lean`.
See the implementation notes for remarks about non-associative and non-unital algebras.
## Main definitions:
* `algebra R A`: the algebra typeclass.
* `alg_hom R A B`: the type of `R`-algebra morphisms from `A` to `B`.
* `alg_equiv R A B`: the type of `R`-algebra isomorphisms between `A` to `B`.
* `algebra_map R A : R →+* A`: the canonical map from `R` to `A`, as a `ring_hom`. This is the
preferred spelling of this map.
* `algebra.linear_map R A : R →ₗ[R] A`: the canonical map from `R` to `A`, as a `linear_map`.
* `algebra.of_id R A : R →ₐ[R] A`: the canonical map from `R` to `A`, as n `alg_hom`.
* Instances of `algebra` in this file:
* `algebra.id`
* `pi.algebra`
* `prod.algebra`
* `algebra_nat`
* `algebra_int`
* `algebra_rat`
* `mul_opposite.algebra`
* `module.End.algebra`
## Notations
* `A →ₐ[R] B` : `R`-algebra homomorphism from `A` to `B`.
* `A ≃ₐ[R] B` : `R`-algebra equivalence from `A` to `B`.
## Implementation notes
Given a commutative (semi)ring `R`, there are two ways to define an `R`-algebra structure on a
(possibly noncommutative) (semi)ring `A`:
* By endowing `A` with a morphism of rings `R →+* A` denoted `algebra_map R A` which lands in the
center of `A`.
* By requiring `A` be an `R`-module such that the action associates and commutes with multiplication
as `r • (a₁ * a₂) = (r • a₁) * a₂ = a₁ * (r • a₂)`.
We define `algebra R A` in a way that subsumes both definitions, by extending `has_smul R A` and
requiring that this scalar action `r • x` must agree with left multiplication by the image of the
structure morphism `algebra_map R A r * x`.
As a result, there are two ways to talk about an `R`-algebra `A` when `A` is a semiring:
1. ```lean
variables [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
variables [algebra R A]
```
2. ```lean
variables [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
variables [module R A] [smul_comm_class R A A] [is_scalar_tower R A A]
```
The first approach implies the second via typeclass search; so any lemma stated with the second set
of arguments will automatically apply to the first set. Typeclass search does not know that the
second approach implies the first, but this can be shown with:
```lean
example {R A : Type*} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[module R A] [smul_comm_class R A A] [is_scalar_tower R A A] : algebra R A :=
algebra.of_module smul_mul_assoc mul_smul_comm
```
The advantage of the first approach is that `algebra_map R A` is available, and `alg_hom R A B` and
`subalgebra R A` can be used. For concrete `R` and `A`, `algebra_map R A` is often definitionally
convenient.
The advantage of the second approach is that `comm_semiring R`, `semiring A`, and `module R A` can
all be relaxed independently; for instance, this allows us to:
* Replace `semiring A` with `non_unital_non_assoc_semiring A` in order to describe non-unital and/or
non-associative algebras.
* Replace `comm_semiring R` and `module R A` with `comm_group R'` and `distrib_mul_action R' A`,
which when `R' = Rˣ` lets us talk about the "algebra-like" action of `Rˣ` on an
`R`-algebra `A`.
While `alg_hom R A B` cannot be used in the second approach, `non_unital_alg_hom R A B` still can.
You should always use the first approach when working with associative unital algebras, and mimic
the second approach only when you need to weaken a condition on either `R` or `A`.
-/
universes u v w u₁ v₁
open_locale big_operators
section prio
-- We set this priority to 0 later in this file
set_option extends_priority 200 /- control priority of
`instance [algebra R A] : has_smul R A` -/
/--
An associative unital `R`-algebra is a semiring `A` equipped with a map into its center `R → A`.
See the implementation notes in this file for discussion of the details of this definition.
-/
@[nolint has_inhabited_instance]
class algebra (R : Type u) (A : Type v) [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
extends has_smul R A, R →+* A :=
(commutes' : ∀ r x, to_fun r * x = x * to_fun r)
(smul_def' : ∀ r x, r • x = to_fun r * x)
end prio
/-- Embedding `R →+* A` given by `algebra` structure. -/
def algebra_map (R : Type u) (A : Type v) [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A] : R →+* A :=
algebra.to_ring_hom
/-- Creating an algebra from a morphism to the center of a semiring. -/
def ring_hom.to_algebra' {R S} [comm_semiring R] [semiring S] (i : R →+* S)
(h : ∀ c x, i c * x = x * i c) :
algebra R S :=
{ smul := λ c x, i c * x,
commutes' := h,
smul_def' := λ c x, rfl,
to_ring_hom := i}
/-- Creating an algebra from a morphism to a commutative semiring. -/
def ring_hom.to_algebra {R S} [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring S] (i : R →+* S) :
algebra R S :=
i.to_algebra' $ λ _, mul_comm _
lemma ring_hom.algebra_map_to_algebra {R S} [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring S]
(i : R →+* S) :
@algebra_map R S _ _ i.to_algebra = i :=
rfl
namespace algebra
variables {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {A : Type w} {B : Type*}
/-- Let `R` be a commutative semiring, let `A` be a semiring with a `module R` structure.
If `(r • 1) * x = x * (r • 1) = r • x` for all `r : R` and `x : A`, then `A` is an `algebra`
over `R`.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible]
def of_module' [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [module R A]
(h₁ : ∀ (r : R) (x : A), (r • 1) * x = r • x)
(h₂ : ∀ (r : R) (x : A), x * (r • 1) = r • x) : algebra R A :=
{ to_fun := λ r, r • 1,
map_one' := one_smul _ _,
map_mul' := λ r₁ r₂, by rw [h₁, mul_smul],
map_zero' := zero_smul _ _,
map_add' := λ r₁ r₂, add_smul r₁ r₂ 1,
commutes' := λ r x, by simp only [h₁, h₂],
smul_def' := λ r x, by simp only [h₁] }
/-- Let `R` be a commutative semiring, let `A` be a semiring with a `module R` structure.
If `(r • x) * y = x * (r • y) = r • (x * y)` for all `r : R` and `x y : A`, then `A`
is an `algebra` over `R`.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible]
def of_module [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [module R A]
(h₁ : ∀ (r : R) (x y : A), (r • x) * y = r • (x * y))
(h₂ : ∀ (r : R) (x y : A), x * (r • y) = r • (x * y)) : algebra R A :=
of_module' (λ r x, by rw [h₁, one_mul]) (λ r x, by rw [h₂, mul_one])
section semiring
variables [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring S]
variables [semiring A] [algebra R A] [semiring B] [algebra R B]
/-- We keep this lemma private because it picks up the `algebra.to_has_smul` instance
which we set to priority 0 shortly. See `smul_def` below for the public version. -/
private lemma smul_def'' (r : R) (x : A) : r • x = algebra_map R A r * x :=
algebra.smul_def' r x
/--
To prove two algebra structures on a fixed `[comm_semiring R] [semiring A]` agree,
it suffices to check the `algebra_map`s agree.
-/
-- We'll later use this to show `algebra ℤ M` is a subsingleton.
@[ext]
lemma algebra_ext {R : Type*} [comm_semiring R] {A : Type*} [semiring A] (P Q : algebra R A)
(w : ∀ (r : R), by { haveI := P, exact algebra_map R A r } =
by { haveI := Q, exact algebra_map R A r }) :
P = Q :=
begin
unfreezingI { rcases P with ⟨⟨P⟩⟩, rcases Q with ⟨⟨Q⟩⟩ },
congr,
{ funext r a,
replace w := congr_arg (λ s, s * a) (w r),
simp only [←smul_def''] at w,
apply w, },
{ ext r,
exact w r, },
{ apply proof_irrel_heq, },
{ apply proof_irrel_heq, },
end
@[priority 200] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance to_module : module R A :=
{ one_smul := by simp [smul_def''],
mul_smul := by simp [smul_def'', mul_assoc],
smul_add := by simp [smul_def'', mul_add],
smul_zero := by simp [smul_def''],
add_smul := by simp [smul_def'', add_mul],
zero_smul := by simp [smul_def''] }
-- From now on, we don't want to use the following instance anymore.
-- Unfortunately, leaving it in place causes deterministic timeouts later in mathlib.
attribute [instance, priority 0] algebra.to_has_smul
lemma smul_def (r : R) (x : A) : r • x = algebra_map R A r * x :=
algebra.smul_def' r x
lemma algebra_map_eq_smul_one (r : R) : algebra_map R A r = r • 1 :=
calc algebra_map R A r = algebra_map R A r * 1 : (mul_one _).symm
... = r • 1 : (algebra.smul_def r 1).symm
lemma algebra_map_eq_smul_one' : ⇑(algebra_map R A) = λ r, r • (1 : A) :=
funext algebra_map_eq_smul_one
/-- `mul_comm` for `algebra`s when one element is from the base ring. -/
theorem commutes (r : R) (x : A) : algebra_map R A r * x = x * algebra_map R A r :=
algebra.commutes' r x
/-- `mul_left_comm` for `algebra`s when one element is from the base ring. -/
theorem left_comm (x : A) (r : R) (y : A) :
x * (algebra_map R A r * y) = algebra_map R A r * (x * y) :=
by rw [← mul_assoc, ← commutes, mul_assoc]
/-- `mul_right_comm` for `algebra`s when one element is from the base ring. -/
theorem right_comm (x : A) (r : R) (y : A) :
(x * algebra_map R A r) * y = (x * y) * algebra_map R A r :=
by rw [mul_assoc, commutes, ←mul_assoc]
instance _root_.is_scalar_tower.right : is_scalar_tower R A A :=
⟨λ x y z, by rw [smul_eq_mul, smul_eq_mul, smul_def, smul_def, mul_assoc]⟩
/-- This is just a special case of the global `mul_smul_comm` lemma that requires less typeclass
search (and was here first). -/
@[simp] protected lemma mul_smul_comm (s : R) (x y : A) :
x * (s • y) = s • (x * y) :=
-- TODO: set up `is_scalar_tower.smul_comm_class` earlier so that we can actually prove this using
-- `mul_smul_comm s x y`.
by rw [smul_def, smul_def, left_comm]
/-- This is just a special case of the global `smul_mul_assoc` lemma that requires less typeclass
search (and was here first). -/
@[simp] protected lemma smul_mul_assoc (r : R) (x y : A) :
(r • x) * y = r • (x * y) :=
smul_mul_assoc r x y
section
variables {r : R} {a : A}
@[simp] lemma bit0_smul_one : bit0 r • (1 : A) = bit0 (r • (1 : A)) :=
by simp [bit0, add_smul]
lemma bit0_smul_one' : bit0 r • (1 : A) = r • 2 :=
by simp [bit0, add_smul, smul_add]
@[simp] lemma bit0_smul_bit0 : bit0 r • bit0 a = r • (bit0 (bit0 a)) :=
by simp [bit0, add_smul, smul_add]
@[simp] lemma bit0_smul_bit1 : bit0 r • bit1 a = r • (bit0 (bit1 a)) :=
by simp [bit0, add_smul, smul_add]
@[simp] lemma bit1_smul_one : bit1 r • (1 : A) = bit1 (r • (1 : A)) :=
by simp [bit1, add_smul]
lemma bit1_smul_one' : bit1 r • (1 : A) = r • 2 + 1 :=
by simp [bit1, bit0, add_smul, smul_add]
@[simp] lemma bit1_smul_bit0 : bit1 r • bit0 a = r • (bit0 (bit0 a)) + bit0 a :=
by simp [bit1, add_smul, smul_add]
@[simp] lemma bit1_smul_bit1 : bit1 r • bit1 a = r • (bit0 (bit1 a)) + bit1 a :=
by { simp only [bit0, bit1, add_smul, smul_add, one_smul], abel }
end
variables (R A)
/--
The canonical ring homomorphism `algebra_map R A : R →* A` for any `R`-algebra `A`,
packaged as an `R`-linear map.
-/
protected def linear_map : R →ₗ[R] A :=
{ map_smul' := λ x y, by simp [algebra.smul_def],
..algebra_map R A }
@[simp]
lemma linear_map_apply (r : R) : algebra.linear_map R A r = algebra_map R A r := rfl
lemma coe_linear_map : ⇑(algebra.linear_map R A) = algebra_map R A := rfl
instance id : algebra R R := (ring_hom.id R).to_algebra
variables {R A}
namespace id
@[simp] lemma map_eq_id : algebra_map R R = ring_hom.id _ := rfl
lemma map_eq_self (x : R) : algebra_map R R x = x := rfl
@[simp] lemma smul_eq_mul (x y : R) : x • y = x * y := rfl
end id
section punit
instance _root_.punit.algebra : algebra R punit :=
{ to_fun := λ x, punit.star,
map_one' := rfl,
map_mul' := λ _ _, rfl,
map_zero' := rfl,
map_add' := λ _ _, rfl,
commutes' := λ _ _, rfl,
smul_def' := λ _ _, rfl }
@[simp] lemma algebra_map_punit (r : R) : algebra_map R punit r = punit.star := rfl
end punit
section ulift
instance _root_.ulift.algebra : algebra R (ulift A) :=
{ to_fun := λ r, ulift.up (algebra_map R A r),
commutes' := λ r x, ulift.down_injective $ algebra.commutes r x.down,
smul_def' := λ r x, ulift.down_injective $ algebra.smul_def' r x.down,
.. ulift.module',
.. (ulift.ring_equiv : ulift A ≃+* A).symm.to_ring_hom.comp (algebra_map R A) }
lemma _root_.ulift.algebra_map_eq (r : R) :
algebra_map R (ulift A) r = ulift.up (algebra_map R A r) := rfl
@[simp] lemma _root_.ulift.down_algebra_map (r : R) :
(algebra_map R (ulift A) r).down = algebra_map R A r := rfl
end ulift
section prod
variables (R A B)
instance _root_.prod.algebra : algebra R (A × B) :=
{ commutes' := by { rintro r ⟨a, b⟩, dsimp, rw [commutes r a, commutes r b] },
smul_def' := by { rintro r ⟨a, b⟩, dsimp, rw [smul_def r a, smul_def r b] },
.. prod.module,
.. ring_hom.prod (algebra_map R A) (algebra_map R B) }
variables {R A B}
@[simp] lemma algebra_map_prod_apply (r : R) :
algebra_map R (A × B) r = (algebra_map R A r, algebra_map R B r) := rfl
end prod
/-- Algebra over a subsemiring. This builds upon `subsemiring.module`. -/
instance of_subsemiring (S : subsemiring R) : algebra S A :=
{ smul := (•),
commutes' := λ r x, algebra.commutes r x,
smul_def' := λ r x, algebra.smul_def r x,
.. (algebra_map R A).comp S.subtype }
lemma algebra_map_of_subsemiring (S : subsemiring R) :
(algebra_map S R : S →+* R) = subsemiring.subtype S := rfl
lemma coe_algebra_map_of_subsemiring (S : subsemiring R) :
(algebra_map S R : S → R) = subtype.val := rfl
lemma algebra_map_of_subsemiring_apply (S : subsemiring R) (x : S) :
algebra_map S R x = x := rfl
/-- Algebra over a subring. This builds upon `subring.module`. -/
instance of_subring {R A : Type*} [comm_ring R] [ring A] [algebra R A]
(S : subring R) : algebra S A :=
{ smul := (•),
.. algebra.of_subsemiring S.to_subsemiring,
.. (algebra_map R A).comp S.subtype }
lemma algebra_map_of_subring {R : Type*} [comm_ring R] (S : subring R) :
(algebra_map S R : S →+* R) = subring.subtype S := rfl
lemma coe_algebra_map_of_subring {R : Type*} [comm_ring R] (S : subring R) :
(algebra_map S R : S → R) = subtype.val := rfl
lemma algebra_map_of_subring_apply {R : Type*} [comm_ring R] (S : subring R) (x : S) :
algebra_map S R x = x := rfl
/-- Explicit characterization of the submonoid map in the case of an algebra.
`S` is made explicit to help with type inference -/
def algebra_map_submonoid (S : Type*) [semiring S] [algebra R S]
(M : submonoid R) : (submonoid S) :=
submonoid.map (algebra_map R S : R →* S) M
lemma mem_algebra_map_submonoid_of_mem {S : Type*} [semiring S] [algebra R S] {M : submonoid R}
(x : M) : (algebra_map R S x) ∈ algebra_map_submonoid S M :=
set.mem_image_of_mem (algebra_map R S) x.2
end semiring
section comm_semiring
variables [comm_semiring R]
lemma mul_sub_algebra_map_commutes [ring A] [algebra R A] (x : A) (r : R) :
x * (x - algebra_map R A r) = (x - algebra_map R A r) * x :=
by rw [mul_sub, ←commutes, sub_mul]
lemma mul_sub_algebra_map_pow_commutes [ring A] [algebra R A] (x : A) (r : R) (n : ℕ) :
x * (x - algebra_map R A r) ^ n = (x - algebra_map R A r) ^ n * x :=
begin
induction n with n ih,
{ simp },
{ rw [pow_succ, ←mul_assoc, mul_sub_algebra_map_commutes, mul_assoc, ih, ←mul_assoc] }
end
end comm_semiring
section ring
variables [comm_ring R]
variables (R)
/-- A `semiring` that is an `algebra` over a commutative ring carries a natural `ring` structure.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible]
def semiring_to_ring [semiring A] [algebra R A] : ring A :=
{ ..module.add_comm_monoid_to_add_comm_group R,
..(infer_instance : semiring A) }
end ring
end algebra
namespace mul_opposite
variables {R A : Type*} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A]
instance : algebra R Aᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ to_ring_hom := (algebra_map R A).to_opposite $ λ x y, algebra.commutes _ _,
smul_def' := λ c x, unop_injective $
by { dsimp, simp only [op_mul, algebra.smul_def, algebra.commutes, op_unop] },
commutes' := λ r, mul_opposite.rec $ λ x, by dsimp; simp only [← op_mul, algebra.commutes],
.. mul_opposite.has_smul A R }
@[simp] lemma algebra_map_apply (c : R) : algebra_map R Aᵐᵒᵖ c = op (algebra_map R A c) := rfl
end mul_opposite
namespace module
variables (R : Type u) (M : Type v) [comm_semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M]
instance : algebra R (module.End R M) :=
algebra.of_module smul_mul_assoc (λ r f g, (smul_comm r f g).symm)
lemma algebra_map_End_eq_smul_id (a : R) :
(algebra_map R (End R M)) a = a • linear_map.id := rfl
@[simp] lemma algebra_map_End_apply (a : R) (m : M) :
(algebra_map R (End R M)) a m = a • m := rfl
@[simp] lemma ker_algebra_map_End (K : Type u) (V : Type v)
[field K] [add_comm_group V] [module K V] (a : K) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
((algebra_map K (End K V)) a).ker = ⊥ :=
linear_map.ker_smul _ _ ha
end module
set_option old_structure_cmd true
/-- Defining the homomorphism in the category R-Alg. -/
@[nolint has_inhabited_instance]
structure alg_hom (R : Type u) (A : Type v) (B : Type w)
[comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] extends ring_hom A B :=
(commutes' : ∀ r : R, to_fun (algebra_map R A r) = algebra_map R B r)
run_cmd tactic.add_doc_string `alg_hom.to_ring_hom "Reinterpret an `alg_hom` as a `ring_hom`"
infixr ` →ₐ `:25 := alg_hom _
notation A ` →ₐ[`:25 R `] ` B := alg_hom R A B
/-- `alg_hom_class F R A B` asserts `F` is a type of bundled algebra homomorphisms
from `A` to `B`. -/
class alg_hom_class (F : Type*) (R : out_param Type*) (A : out_param Type*) (B : out_param Type*)
[comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B]
extends ring_hom_class F A B :=
(commutes : ∀ (f : F) (r : R), f (algebra_map R A r) = algebra_map R B r)
-- `R` becomes a metavariable but that's fine because it's an `out_param`
attribute [nolint dangerous_instance] alg_hom_class.to_ring_hom_class
attribute [simp] alg_hom_class.commutes
namespace alg_hom_class
variables {R : Type*} {A : Type*} {B : Type*} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [semiring B]
[algebra R A] [algebra R B]
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance {F : Type*} [alg_hom_class F R A B] : linear_map_class F R A B :=
{ map_smulₛₗ := λ f r x, by simp only [algebra.smul_def, map_mul, commutes, ring_hom.id_apply],
..‹alg_hom_class F R A B› }
end alg_hom_class
namespace alg_hom
variables {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} {C : Type u₁} {D : Type v₁}
section semiring
variables [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [semiring B] [semiring C] [semiring D]
variables [algebra R A] [algebra R B] [algebra R C] [algebra R D]
instance : has_coe_to_fun (A →ₐ[R] B) (λ _, A → B) := ⟨alg_hom.to_fun⟩
initialize_simps_projections alg_hom (to_fun → apply)
@[simp] lemma to_fun_eq_coe (f : A →ₐ[R] B) : f.to_fun = f := rfl
instance : alg_hom_class (A →ₐ[R] B) R A B :=
{ coe := to_fun,
coe_injective' := λ f g h, by { cases f, cases g, congr' },
map_add := map_add',
map_zero := map_zero',
map_mul := map_mul',
map_one := map_one',
commutes := λ f, f.commutes' }
instance coe_ring_hom : has_coe (A →ₐ[R] B) (A →+* B) := ⟨alg_hom.to_ring_hom⟩
instance coe_monoid_hom : has_coe (A →ₐ[R] B) (A →* B) := ⟨λ f, ↑(f : A →+* B)⟩
instance coe_add_monoid_hom : has_coe (A →ₐ[R] B) (A →+ B) := ⟨λ f, ↑(f : A →+* B)⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mk {f : A → B} (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅) :
⇑(⟨f, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄, h₅⟩ : A →ₐ[R] B) = f := rfl
-- make the coercion the simp-normal form
@[simp] lemma to_ring_hom_eq_coe (f : A →ₐ[R] B) : f.to_ring_hom = f := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_to_ring_hom (f : A →ₐ[R] B) : ⇑(f : A →+* B) = f := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_to_monoid_hom (f : A →ₐ[R] B) : ⇑(f : A →* B) = f := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_to_add_monoid_hom (f : A →ₐ[R] B) : ⇑(f : A →+ B) = f := rfl
variables (φ : A →ₐ[R] B)
theorem coe_fn_injective : @function.injective (A →ₐ[R] B) (A → B) coe_fn := fun_like.coe_injective
theorem coe_fn_inj {φ₁ φ₂ : A →ₐ[R] B} : (φ₁ : A → B) = φ₂ ↔ φ₁ = φ₂ := fun_like.coe_fn_eq
theorem coe_ring_hom_injective : function.injective (coe : (A →ₐ[R] B) → (A →+* B)) :=
λ φ₁ φ₂ H, coe_fn_injective $ show ((φ₁ : (A →+* B)) : A → B) = ((φ₂ : (A →+* B)) : A → B),
from congr_arg _ H
theorem coe_monoid_hom_injective : function.injective (coe : (A →ₐ[R] B) → (A →* B)) :=
ring_hom.coe_monoid_hom_injective.comp coe_ring_hom_injective
theorem coe_add_monoid_hom_injective : function.injective (coe : (A →ₐ[R] B) → (A →+ B)) :=
ring_hom.coe_add_monoid_hom_injective.comp coe_ring_hom_injective
protected lemma congr_fun {φ₁ φ₂ : A →ₐ[R] B} (H : φ₁ = φ₂) (x : A) : φ₁ x = φ₂ x :=
fun_like.congr_fun H x
protected lemma congr_arg (φ : A →ₐ[R] B) {x y : A} (h : x = y) : φ x = φ y :=
fun_like.congr_arg φ h
@[ext]
theorem ext {φ₁ φ₂ : A →ₐ[R] B} (H : ∀ x, φ₁ x = φ₂ x) : φ₁ = φ₂ := fun_like.ext _ _ H
theorem ext_iff {φ₁ φ₂ : A →ₐ[R] B} : φ₁ = φ₂ ↔ ∀ x, φ₁ x = φ₂ x := fun_like.ext_iff
@[simp] theorem mk_coe {f : A →ₐ[R] B} (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅) :
(⟨f, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄, h₅⟩ : A →ₐ[R] B) = f := ext $ λ _, rfl
@[simp]
theorem commutes (r : R) : φ (algebra_map R A r) = algebra_map R B r := φ.commutes' r
theorem comp_algebra_map : (φ : A →+* B).comp (algebra_map R A) = algebra_map R B :=
ring_hom.ext $ φ.commutes
protected lemma map_add (r s : A) : φ (r + s) = φ r + φ s := map_add _ _ _
protected lemma map_zero : φ 0 = 0 := map_zero _
protected lemma map_mul (x y) : φ (x * y) = φ x * φ y := map_mul _ _ _
protected lemma map_one : φ 1 = 1 := map_one _
protected lemma map_pow (x : A) (n : ℕ) : φ (x ^ n) = (φ x) ^ n := map_pow _ _ _
@[simp] protected lemma map_smul (r : R) (x : A) : φ (r • x) = r • φ x := map_smul _ _ _
protected lemma map_sum {ι : Type*} (f : ι → A) (s : finset ι) :
φ (∑ x in s, f x) = ∑ x in s, φ (f x) := map_sum _ _ _
protected lemma map_finsupp_sum {α : Type*} [has_zero α] {ι : Type*} (f : ι →₀ α) (g : ι → α → A) :
φ (f.sum g) = f.sum (λ i a, φ (g i a)) := map_finsupp_sum _ _ _
protected lemma map_bit0 (x) : φ (bit0 x) = bit0 (φ x) := map_bit0 _ _
protected lemma map_bit1 (x) : φ (bit1 x) = bit1 (φ x) := map_bit1 _ _
/-- If a `ring_hom` is `R`-linear, then it is an `alg_hom`. -/
def mk' (f : A →+* B) (h : ∀ (c : R) x, f (c • x) = c • f x) : A →ₐ[R] B :=
{ to_fun := f,
commutes' := λ c, by simp only [algebra.algebra_map_eq_smul_one, h, f.map_one],
.. f }
@[simp] lemma coe_mk' (f : A →+* B) (h : ∀ (c : R) x, f (c • x) = c • f x) : ⇑(mk' f h) = f := rfl
section
variables (R A)
/-- Identity map as an `alg_hom`. -/
protected def id : A →ₐ[R] A :=
{ commutes' := λ _, rfl,
..ring_hom.id A }
@[simp] lemma coe_id : ⇑(alg_hom.id R A) = id := rfl
@[simp] lemma id_to_ring_hom : (alg_hom.id R A : A →+* A) = ring_hom.id _ := rfl
end
lemma id_apply (p : A) : alg_hom.id R A p = p := rfl
/-- Composition of algebra homeomorphisms. -/
def comp (φ₁ : B →ₐ[R] C) (φ₂ : A →ₐ[R] B) : A →ₐ[R] C :=
{ commutes' := λ r : R, by rw [← φ₁.commutes, ← φ₂.commutes]; refl,
.. φ₁.to_ring_hom.comp ↑φ₂ }
@[simp] lemma coe_comp (φ₁ : B →ₐ[R] C) (φ₂ : A →ₐ[R] B) : ⇑(φ₁.comp φ₂) = φ₁ ∘ φ₂ := rfl
lemma comp_apply (φ₁ : B →ₐ[R] C) (φ₂ : A →ₐ[R] B) (p : A) : φ₁.comp φ₂ p = φ₁ (φ₂ p) := rfl
lemma comp_to_ring_hom (φ₁ : B →ₐ[R] C) (φ₂ : A →ₐ[R] B) :
⇑(φ₁.comp φ₂ : A →+* C) = (φ₁ : B →+* C).comp ↑φ₂ := rfl
@[simp] theorem comp_id : φ.comp (alg_hom.id R A) = φ :=
ext $ λ x, rfl
@[simp] theorem id_comp : (alg_hom.id R B).comp φ = φ :=
ext $ λ x, rfl
theorem comp_assoc (φ₁ : C →ₐ[R] D) (φ₂ : B →ₐ[R] C) (φ₃ : A →ₐ[R] B) :
(φ₁.comp φ₂).comp φ₃ = φ₁.comp (φ₂.comp φ₃) :=
ext $ λ x, rfl
/-- R-Alg ⥤ R-Mod -/
def to_linear_map : A →ₗ[R] B :=
{ to_fun := φ,
map_add' := map_add _,
map_smul' := map_smul _ }
@[simp] lemma to_linear_map_apply (p : A) : φ.to_linear_map p = φ p := rfl
theorem to_linear_map_injective : function.injective (to_linear_map : _ → (A →ₗ[R] B)) :=
λ φ₁ φ₂ h, ext $ linear_map.congr_fun h
@[simp] lemma comp_to_linear_map (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (g : B →ₐ[R] C) :
(g.comp f).to_linear_map = g.to_linear_map.comp f.to_linear_map := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_linear_map_id : to_linear_map (alg_hom.id R A) = linear_map.id :=
linear_map.ext $ λ _, rfl
/-- Promote a `linear_map` to an `alg_hom` by supplying proofs about the behavior on `1` and `*`. -/
@[simps]
def of_linear_map (f : A →ₗ[R] B) (map_one : f 1 = 1) (map_mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) :
A →ₐ[R] B :=
{ to_fun := f,
map_one' := map_one,
map_mul' := map_mul,
commutes' := λ c, by simp only [algebra.algebra_map_eq_smul_one, f.map_smul, map_one],
.. f.to_add_monoid_hom }
@[simp] lemma of_linear_map_to_linear_map (map_one) (map_mul) :
of_linear_map φ.to_linear_map map_one map_mul = φ :=
by { ext, refl }
@[simp] lemma to_linear_map_of_linear_map (f : A →ₗ[R] B) (map_one) (map_mul) :
to_linear_map (of_linear_map f map_one map_mul) = f :=
by { ext, refl }
@[simp] lemma of_linear_map_id (map_one) (map_mul) :
of_linear_map linear_map.id map_one map_mul = alg_hom.id R A :=
ext $ λ _, rfl
lemma map_smul_of_tower {R'} [has_smul R' A] [has_smul R' B]
[linear_map.compatible_smul A B R' R] (r : R') (x : A) : φ (r • x) = r • φ x :=
φ.to_linear_map.map_smul_of_tower r x
lemma map_list_prod (s : list A) :
φ s.prod = (s.map φ).prod :=
φ.to_ring_hom.map_list_prod s
section prod
/-- First projection as `alg_hom`. -/
def fst : A × B →ₐ[R] A :=
{ commutes' := λ r, rfl, .. ring_hom.fst A B}
/-- Second projection as `alg_hom`. -/
def snd : A × B →ₐ[R] B :=
{ commutes' := λ r, rfl, .. ring_hom.snd A B}
end prod
lemma algebra_map_eq_apply (f : A →ₐ[R] B) {y : R} {x : A} (h : algebra_map R A y = x) :
algebra_map R B y = f x :=
h ▸ (f.commutes _).symm
end semiring
section comm_semiring
variables [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring A] [comm_semiring B]
variables [algebra R A] [algebra R B] (φ : A →ₐ[R] B)
protected lemma map_multiset_prod (s : multiset A) :
φ s.prod = (s.map φ).prod := map_multiset_prod _ _
protected lemma map_prod {ι : Type*} (f : ι → A) (s : finset ι) :
φ (∏ x in s, f x) = ∏ x in s, φ (f x) := map_prod _ _ _
protected lemma map_finsupp_prod {α : Type*} [has_zero α] {ι : Type*} (f : ι →₀ α) (g : ι → α → A) :
φ (f.prod g) = f.prod (λ i a, φ (g i a)) := map_finsupp_prod _ _ _
end comm_semiring
section ring
variables [comm_semiring R] [ring A] [ring B]
variables [algebra R A] [algebra R B] (φ : A →ₐ[R] B)
protected lemma map_neg (x) : φ (-x) = -φ x := map_neg _ _
protected lemma map_sub (x y) : φ (x - y) = φ x - φ y := map_sub _ _ _
@[simp] lemma map_int_cast (n : ℤ) : φ n = n :=
φ.to_ring_hom.map_int_cast n
end ring
section division_ring
variables [comm_semiring R] [division_ring A] [division_ring B]
variables [algebra R A] [algebra R B] (φ : A →ₐ[R] B)
@[simp] lemma map_inv (x) : φ (x⁻¹) = (φ x)⁻¹ :=
φ.to_ring_hom.map_inv x
@[simp] lemma map_div (x y) : φ (x / y) = φ x / φ y :=
φ.to_ring_hom.map_div x y
end division_ring
end alg_hom
@[simp] lemma rat.smul_one_eq_coe {A : Type*} [division_ring A] [algebra ℚ A] (m : ℚ) :
m • (1 : A) = ↑m :=
by rw [algebra.smul_def, mul_one, ring_hom.eq_rat_cast]
set_option old_structure_cmd true
/-- An equivalence of algebras is an equivalence of rings commuting with the actions of scalars. -/
structure alg_equiv (R : Type u) (A : Type v) (B : Type w)
[comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B]
extends A ≃ B, A ≃* B, A ≃+ B, A ≃+* B :=
(commutes' : ∀ r : R, to_fun (algebra_map R A r) = algebra_map R B r)
attribute [nolint doc_blame] alg_equiv.to_ring_equiv
attribute [nolint doc_blame] alg_equiv.to_equiv
attribute [nolint doc_blame] alg_equiv.to_add_equiv
attribute [nolint doc_blame] alg_equiv.to_mul_equiv
notation A ` ≃ₐ[`:50 R `] ` A' := alg_equiv R A A'
/-- `alg_equiv_class F R A B` states that `F` is a type of algebra structure preserving
equivalences. You should extend this class when you extend `alg_equiv`. -/
class alg_equiv_class (F : Type*) (R A B : out_param Type*)
[comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B]
extends ring_equiv_class F A B :=
(commutes : ∀ (f : F) (r : R), f (algebra_map R A r) = algebra_map R B r)
-- `R` becomes a metavariable but that's fine because it's an `out_param`
attribute [nolint dangerous_instance] alg_equiv_class.to_ring_equiv_class
namespace alg_equiv_class
@[priority 100] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance to_alg_hom_class (F R A B : Type*)
[comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B]
[h : alg_equiv_class F R A B] : alg_hom_class F R A B :=
{ coe := coe_fn,
coe_injective' := fun_like.coe_injective,
map_zero := map_zero,
map_one := map_one,
.. h }
end alg_equiv_class
namespace alg_equiv
variables {R : Type u} {A₁ : Type v} {A₂ : Type w} {A₃ : Type u₁}
section semiring
variables [comm_semiring R] [semiring A₁] [semiring A₂] [semiring A₃]
variables [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] [algebra R A₃]
variables (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂)
instance : alg_equiv_class (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) R A₁ A₂ :=
{ coe := to_fun,
inv := inv_fun,
coe_injective' := λ f g h₁ h₂, by { cases f, cases g, congr' },
map_add := map_add',
map_mul := map_mul',
commutes := commutes',
left_inv := left_inv,
right_inv := right_inv }
/-- Helper instance for when there's too many metavariables to apply
`fun_like.has_coe_to_fun` directly. -/
instance : has_coe_to_fun (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (λ _, A₁ → A₂) := ⟨alg_equiv.to_fun⟩
@[ext]
lemma ext {f g : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g := fun_like.ext f g h
protected lemma congr_arg {f : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂} {x x' : A₁} : x = x' → f x = f x' :=
fun_like.congr_arg f
protected lemma congr_fun {f g : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂} (h : f = g) (x : A₁) : f x = g x :=
fun_like.congr_fun h x
protected lemma ext_iff {f g : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂} : f = g ↔ ∀ x, f x = g x := fun_like.ext_iff
lemma coe_fun_injective : @function.injective (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (A₁ → A₂) (λ e, (e : A₁ → A₂)) :=
fun_like.coe_injective
instance has_coe_to_ring_equiv : has_coe (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (A₁ ≃+* A₂) := ⟨alg_equiv.to_ring_equiv⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_mk {to_fun inv_fun left_inv right_inv map_mul map_add commutes} :
⇑(⟨to_fun, inv_fun, left_inv, right_inv, map_mul, map_add, commutes⟩ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) = to_fun :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem mk_coe (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e' h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅) :
(⟨e, e', h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄, h₅⟩ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) = e := ext $ λ _, rfl
@[simp] lemma to_fun_eq_coe (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : e.to_fun = e := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_equiv_eq_coe : e.to_equiv = e := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_ring_equiv_eq_coe : e.to_ring_equiv = e := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_ring_equiv : ((e : A₁ ≃+* A₂) : A₁ → A₂) = e := rfl
lemma coe_ring_equiv' : (e.to_ring_equiv : A₁ → A₂) = e := rfl
lemma coe_ring_equiv_injective : function.injective (coe : (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) → (A₁ ≃+* A₂)) :=
λ e₁ e₂ h, ext $ ring_equiv.congr_fun h
protected lemma map_add : ∀ x y, e (x + y) = e x + e y := map_add e
protected lemma map_zero : e 0 = 0 := map_zero e
protected lemma map_mul : ∀ x y, e (x * y) = (e x) * (e y) := map_mul e
protected lemma map_one : e 1 = 1 := map_one e
@[simp] lemma commutes : ∀ (r : R), e (algebra_map R A₁ r) = algebra_map R A₂ r :=
e.commutes'
@[simp] lemma map_smul (r : R) (x : A₁) : e (r • x) = r • e x :=
by simp only [algebra.smul_def, map_mul, commutes]
lemma map_sum {ι : Type*} (f : ι → A₁) (s : finset ι) :
e (∑ x in s, f x) = ∑ x in s, e (f x) :=
e.to_add_equiv.map_sum f s
lemma map_finsupp_sum {α : Type*} [has_zero α] {ι : Type*} (f : ι →₀ α) (g : ι → α → A₁) :
e (f.sum g) = f.sum (λ i b, e (g i b)) :=
e.map_sum _ _
/-- Interpret an algebra equivalence as an algebra homomorphism.
This definition is included for symmetry with the other `to_*_hom` projections.
The `simp` normal form is to use the coercion of the `has_coe_to_alg_hom` instance. -/
def to_alg_hom : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂ :=
{ map_one' := e.map_one, map_zero' := e.map_zero, ..e }
instance has_coe_to_alg_hom : has_coe (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) :=
⟨to_alg_hom⟩
@[simp] lemma to_alg_hom_eq_coe : e.to_alg_hom = e := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_alg_hom : ((e : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) : A₁ → A₂) = e :=
rfl
lemma coe_alg_hom_injective : function.injective (coe : (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) → (A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂)) :=
λ e₁ e₂ h, ext $ alg_hom.congr_fun h
/-- The two paths coercion can take to a `ring_hom` are equivalent -/
lemma coe_ring_hom_commutes : ((e : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) : A₁ →+* A₂) = ((e : A₁ ≃+* A₂) : A₁ →+* A₂) :=
rfl
protected lemma map_pow : ∀ (x : A₁) (n : ℕ), e (x ^ n) = (e x) ^ n := map_pow _
protected lemma injective : function.injective e := equiv_like.injective e
protected lemma surjective : function.surjective e := equiv_like.surjective e
protected lemma bijective : function.bijective e := equiv_like.bijective e
/-- Algebra equivalences are reflexive. -/
@[refl] def refl : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁ := {commutes' := λ r, rfl, ..(1 : A₁ ≃+* A₁)}
instance : inhabited (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) := ⟨refl⟩
@[simp] lemma refl_to_alg_hom : ↑(refl : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) = alg_hom.id R A₁ := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_refl : ⇑(refl : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) = id := rfl
/-- Algebra equivalences are symmetric. -/
@[symm]
def symm (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₁ :=
{ commutes' := λ r, by { rw ←e.to_ring_equiv.symm_apply_apply (algebra_map R A₁ r), congr,
change _ = e _, rw e.commutes, },
..e.to_ring_equiv.symm, }
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def simps.symm_apply (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : A₂ → A₁ := e.symm
initialize_simps_projections alg_equiv (to_fun → apply, inv_fun → symm_apply)
@[simp] lemma inv_fun_eq_symm {e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂} : e.inv_fun = e.symm := rfl
@[simp] lemma symm_symm (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : e.symm.symm = e :=
by { ext, refl, }
lemma symm_bijective : function.bijective (symm : (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) → (A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₁)) :=
equiv.bijective ⟨symm, symm, symm_symm, symm_symm⟩
@[simp] lemma mk_coe' (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (f h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅) :
(⟨f, e, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄, h₅⟩ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) = e.symm :=
symm_bijective.injective $ ext $ λ x, rfl
@[simp] theorem symm_mk (f f') (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅) :
(⟨f, f', h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄, h₅⟩ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂).symm =
{ to_fun := f', inv_fun := f,
..(⟨f, f', h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄, h₅⟩ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂).symm } := rfl
@[simp]
theorem refl_symm : (alg_equiv.refl : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁).symm = alg_equiv.refl := rfl
/-- Algebra equivalences are transitive. -/
@[trans]
def trans (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₃ :=
{ commutes' := λ r, show e₂.to_fun (e₁.to_fun _) = _, by rw [e₁.commutes', e₂.commutes'],
..(e₁.to_ring_equiv.trans e₂.to_ring_equiv), }
@[simp] lemma apply_symm_apply (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : ∀ x, e (e.symm x) = x :=
e.to_equiv.apply_symm_apply
@[simp] lemma symm_apply_apply (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : ∀ x, e.symm (e x) = x :=
e.to_equiv.symm_apply_apply
@[simp] lemma symm_trans_apply (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) (x : A₃) :
(e₁.trans e₂).symm x = e₁.symm (e₂.symm x) := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_trans (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) :
⇑(e₁.trans e₂) = e₂ ∘ e₁ := rfl
@[simp] lemma trans_apply (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) (x : A₁) :
(e₁.trans e₂) x = e₂ (e₁ x) := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_symm (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) :
alg_hom.comp (e : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) ↑e.symm = alg_hom.id R A₂ :=
by { ext, simp }
@[simp] lemma symm_comp (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) :
alg_hom.comp ↑e.symm (e : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) = alg_hom.id R A₁ :=
by { ext, simp }
theorem left_inverse_symm (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : function.left_inverse e.symm e := e.left_inv
theorem right_inverse_symm (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : function.right_inverse e.symm e := e.right_inv
/-- If `A₁` is equivalent to `A₁'` and `A₂` is equivalent to `A₂'`, then the type of maps
`A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂` is equivalent to the type of maps `A₁' →ₐ[R] A₂'`. -/
def arrow_congr {A₁' A₂' : Type*} [semiring A₁'] [semiring A₂'] [algebra R A₁'] [algebra R A₂']
(e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁') (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₂') : (A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) ≃ (A₁' →ₐ[R] A₂') :=
{ to_fun := λ f, (e₂.to_alg_hom.comp f).comp e₁.symm.to_alg_hom,
inv_fun := λ f, (e₂.symm.to_alg_hom.comp f).comp e₁.to_alg_hom,
left_inv := λ f, by { simp only [alg_hom.comp_assoc, to_alg_hom_eq_coe, symm_comp],
simp only [←alg_hom.comp_assoc, symm_comp, alg_hom.id_comp, alg_hom.comp_id] },
right_inv := λ f, by { simp only [alg_hom.comp_assoc, to_alg_hom_eq_coe, comp_symm],
simp only [←alg_hom.comp_assoc, comp_symm, alg_hom.id_comp, alg_hom.comp_id] } }
lemma arrow_congr_comp {A₁' A₂' A₃' : Type*} [semiring A₁'] [semiring A₂'] [semiring A₃']
[algebra R A₁'] [algebra R A₂'] [algebra R A₃'] (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁') (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₂')
(e₃ : A₃ ≃ₐ[R] A₃') (f : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) (g : A₂ →ₐ[R] A₃) :
arrow_congr e₁ e₃ (g.comp f) = (arrow_congr e₂ e₃ g).comp (arrow_congr e₁ e₂ f) :=
by { ext, simp only [arrow_congr, equiv.coe_fn_mk, alg_hom.comp_apply],
congr, exact (e₂.symm_apply_apply _).symm }
@[simp] lemma arrow_congr_refl :
arrow_congr alg_equiv.refl alg_equiv.refl = equiv.refl (A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) :=
by { ext, refl }
@[simp] lemma arrow_congr_trans {A₁' A₂' A₃' : Type*} [semiring A₁'] [semiring A₂'] [semiring A₃']
[algebra R A₁'] [algebra R A₂'] [algebra R A₃'] (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e₁' : A₁' ≃ₐ[R] A₂')
(e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) (e₂' : A₂' ≃ₐ[R] A₃') :
arrow_congr (e₁.trans e₂) (e₁'.trans e₂') = (arrow_congr e₁ e₁').trans (arrow_congr e₂ e₂') :=
by { ext, refl }
@[simp] lemma arrow_congr_symm {A₁' A₂' : Type*} [semiring A₁'] [semiring A₂']
[algebra R A₁'] [algebra R A₂'] (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁') (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₂') :
(arrow_congr e₁ e₂).symm = arrow_congr e₁.symm e₂.symm :=
by { ext, refl }
/-- If an algebra morphism has an inverse, it is a algebra isomorphism. -/
def of_alg_hom (f : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) (g : A₂ →ₐ[R] A₁) (h₁ : f.comp g = alg_hom.id R A₂)
(h₂ : g.comp f = alg_hom.id R A₁) : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂ :=
{ to_fun := f,
inv_fun := g,
left_inv := alg_hom.ext_iff.1 h₂,
right_inv := alg_hom.ext_iff.1 h₁,
..f }
lemma coe_alg_hom_of_alg_hom (f : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) (g : A₂ →ₐ[R] A₁) (h₁ h₂) :
↑(of_alg_hom f g h₁ h₂) = f := alg_hom.ext $ λ _, rfl
@[simp]
lemma of_alg_hom_coe_alg_hom (f : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (g : A₂ →ₐ[R] A₁) (h₁ h₂) :
of_alg_hom ↑f g h₁ h₂ = f := ext $ λ _, rfl
lemma of_alg_hom_symm (f : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) (g : A₂ →ₐ[R] A₁) (h₁ h₂) :
(of_alg_hom f g h₁ h₂).symm = of_alg_hom g f h₂ h₁ := rfl
/-- Promotes a bijective algebra homomorphism to an algebra equivalence. -/
noncomputable def of_bijective (f : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) (hf : function.bijective f) : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂ :=
{ .. ring_equiv.of_bijective (f : A₁ →+* A₂) hf, .. f }
@[simp] lemma coe_of_bijective {f : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂} {hf : function.bijective f} :
(alg_equiv.of_bijective f hf : A₁ → A₂) = f := rfl
lemma of_bijective_apply {f : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂} {hf : function.bijective f} (a : A₁) :
(alg_equiv.of_bijective f hf) a = f a := rfl
/-- Forgetting the multiplicative structures, an equivalence of algebras is a linear equivalence. -/
@[simps apply] def to_linear_equiv (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : A₁ ≃ₗ[R] A₂ :=
{ to_fun := e,
map_smul' := e.map_smul,
inv_fun := e.symm,
.. e }
@[simp] lemma to_linear_equiv_refl :
(alg_equiv.refl : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁).to_linear_equiv = linear_equiv.refl R A₁ := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_linear_equiv_symm (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) :
e.to_linear_equiv.symm = e.symm.to_linear_equiv := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_linear_equiv_trans (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) :
(e₁.trans e₂).to_linear_equiv = e₁.to_linear_equiv.trans e₂.to_linear_equiv := rfl
theorem to_linear_equiv_injective : function.injective (to_linear_equiv : _ → (A₁ ≃ₗ[R] A₂)) :=
λ e₁ e₂ h, ext $ linear_equiv.congr_fun h
/-- Interpret an algebra equivalence as a linear map. -/
def to_linear_map : A₁ →ₗ[R] A₂ :=
e.to_alg_hom.to_linear_map
@[simp] lemma to_alg_hom_to_linear_map :
(e : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂).to_linear_map = e.to_linear_map := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_linear_equiv_to_linear_map :
e.to_linear_equiv.to_linear_map = e.to_linear_map := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_linear_map_apply (x : A₁) : e.to_linear_map x = e x := rfl
theorem to_linear_map_injective : function.injective (to_linear_map : _ → (A₁ →ₗ[R] A₂)) :=
λ e₁ e₂ h, ext $ linear_map.congr_fun h
@[simp] lemma trans_to_linear_map (f : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (g : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) :
(f.trans g).to_linear_map = g.to_linear_map.comp f.to_linear_map := rfl
section of_linear_equiv
variables (l : A₁ ≃ₗ[R] A₂)
(map_mul : ∀ x y : A₁, l (x * y) = l x * l y)
(commutes : ∀ r : R, l (algebra_map R A₁ r) = algebra_map R A₂ r)
/--
Upgrade a linear equivalence to an algebra equivalence,
given that it distributes over multiplication and action of scalars.
-/
@[simps apply]
def of_linear_equiv : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂ :=
{ to_fun := l,
inv_fun := l.symm,
map_mul' := map_mul,
commutes' := commutes,
..l }
@[simp]
lemma of_linear_equiv_symm :
(of_linear_equiv l map_mul commutes).symm = of_linear_equiv l.symm
((of_linear_equiv l map_mul commutes).symm.map_mul)
((of_linear_equiv l map_mul commutes).symm.commutes) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma of_linear_equiv_to_linear_equiv (map_mul) (commutes) :
of_linear_equiv e.to_linear_equiv map_mul commutes = e :=
by { ext, refl }
@[simp] lemma to_linear_equiv_of_linear_equiv :
to_linear_equiv (of_linear_equiv l map_mul commutes) = l :=
by { ext, refl }
end of_linear_equiv
@[simps mul one {attrs := []}] instance aut : group (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) :=
{ mul := λ ϕ ψ, ψ.trans ϕ,
mul_assoc := λ ϕ ψ χ, rfl,
one := refl,
one_mul := λ ϕ, ext $ λ x, rfl,
mul_one := λ ϕ, ext $ λ x, rfl,
inv := symm,
mul_left_inv := λ ϕ, ext $ symm_apply_apply ϕ }
@[simp] lemma one_apply (x : A₁) : (1 : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) x = x := rfl
@[simp] lemma mul_apply (e₁ e₂ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) (x : A₁) : (e₁ * e₂) x = e₁ (e₂ x) := rfl
/-- An algebra isomorphism induces a group isomorphism between automorphism groups -/
@[simps apply]
def aut_congr (ϕ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) ≃* (A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) :=
{ to_fun := λ ψ, ϕ.symm.trans (ψ.trans ϕ),
inv_fun := λ ψ, ϕ.trans (ψ.trans ϕ.symm),
left_inv := λ ψ, by { ext, simp_rw [trans_apply, symm_apply_apply] },
right_inv := λ ψ, by { ext, simp_rw [trans_apply, apply_symm_apply] },
map_mul' := λ ψ χ, by { ext, simp only [mul_apply, trans_apply, symm_apply_apply] } }
@[simp] lemma aut_congr_refl : aut_congr (alg_equiv.refl) = mul_equiv.refl (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) :=
by { ext, refl }
@[simp] lemma aut_congr_symm (ϕ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : (aut_congr ϕ).symm = aut_congr ϕ.symm := rfl
@[simp] lemma aut_congr_trans (ϕ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (ψ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) :
(aut_congr ϕ).trans (aut_congr ψ) = aut_congr (ϕ.trans ψ) := rfl
/-- The tautological action by `A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁` on `A₁`.
This generalizes `function.End.apply_mul_action`. -/
instance apply_mul_semiring_action : mul_semiring_action (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) A₁ :=
{ smul := ($),
smul_zero := alg_equiv.map_zero,
smul_add := alg_equiv.map_add,
smul_one := alg_equiv.map_one,
smul_mul := alg_equiv.map_mul,
one_smul := λ _, rfl,
mul_smul := λ _ _ _, rfl }
@[simp] protected lemma smul_def (f : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) (a : A₁) : f • a = f a := rfl
instance apply_has_faithful_smul : has_faithful_smul (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) A₁ :=
⟨λ _ _, alg_equiv.ext⟩
instance apply_smul_comm_class : smul_comm_class R (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) A₁ :=
{ smul_comm := λ r e a, (e.map_smul r a).symm }
instance apply_smul_comm_class' : smul_comm_class (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) R A₁ :=
{ smul_comm := λ e r a, (e.map_smul r a) }
@[simp] lemma algebra_map_eq_apply (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) {y : R} {x : A₁} :
(algebra_map R A₂ y = e x) ↔ (algebra_map R A₁ y = x) :=
⟨λ h, by simpa using e.symm.to_alg_hom.algebra_map_eq_apply h,
λ h, e.to_alg_hom.algebra_map_eq_apply h⟩
end semiring
section comm_semiring
variables [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring A₁] [comm_semiring A₂]
variables [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂)
lemma map_prod {ι : Type*} (f : ι → A₁) (s : finset ι) :
e (∏ x in s, f x) = ∏ x in s, e (f x) :=
map_prod _ f s
lemma map_finsupp_prod {α : Type*} [has_zero α] {ι : Type*} (f : ι →₀ α) (g : ι → α → A₁) :
e (f.prod g) = f.prod (λ i a, e (g i a)) :=
map_finsupp_prod _ f g
end comm_semiring
section ring
variables [comm_semiring R] [ring A₁] [ring A₂]
variables [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂)
protected lemma map_neg (x) : e (-x) = -e x := map_neg e x
protected lemma map_sub (x y) : e (x - y) = e x - e y := map_sub e x y
end ring
section division_ring
variables [comm_ring R] [division_ring A₁] [division_ring A₂]
variables [algebra R A₁] [algebra R A₂] (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂)
@[simp] lemma map_inv (x) : e (x⁻¹) = (e x)⁻¹ :=
e.to_alg_hom.map_inv x
@[simp] lemma map_div (x y) : e (x / y) = e x / e y :=
e.to_alg_hom.map_div x y
end division_ring
end alg_equiv
namespace mul_semiring_action
variables {M G : Type*} (R A : Type*) [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A]
section
variables [monoid M] [mul_semiring_action M A] [smul_comm_class M R A]
/-- Each element of the monoid defines a algebra homomorphism.
This is a stronger version of `mul_semiring_action.to_ring_hom` and
`distrib_mul_action.to_linear_map`. -/
@[simps]
def to_alg_hom (m : M) : A →ₐ[R] A :=
alg_hom.mk' (mul_semiring_action.to_ring_hom _ _ m) (smul_comm _)
theorem to_alg_hom_injective [has_faithful_smul M A] :
function.injective (mul_semiring_action.to_alg_hom R A : M → A →ₐ[R] A) :=
λ m₁ m₂ h, eq_of_smul_eq_smul $ λ r, alg_hom.ext_iff.1 h r
end
section
variables [group G] [mul_semiring_action G A] [smul_comm_class G R A]
/-- Each element of the group defines a algebra equivalence.
This is a stronger version of `mul_semiring_action.to_ring_equiv` and
`distrib_mul_action.to_linear_equiv`. -/
@[simps]
def to_alg_equiv (g : G) : A ≃ₐ[R] A :=
{ .. mul_semiring_action.to_ring_equiv _ _ g,
.. mul_semiring_action.to_alg_hom R A g }
theorem to_alg_equiv_injective [has_faithful_smul G A] :
function.injective (mul_semiring_action.to_alg_equiv R A : G → A ≃ₐ[R] A) :=
λ m₁ m₂ h, eq_of_smul_eq_smul $ λ r, alg_equiv.ext_iff.1 h r
end
end mul_semiring_action
section nat
variables {R : Type*} [semiring R]
-- Lower the priority so that `algebra.id` is picked most of the time when working with
-- `ℕ`-algebras. This is only an issue since `algebra.id` and `algebra_nat` are not yet defeq.
-- TODO: fix this by adding an `of_nat` field to semirings.
/-- Semiring ⥤ ℕ-Alg -/
@[priority 99] instance algebra_nat : algebra ℕ R :=
{ commutes' := nat.cast_commute,
smul_def' := λ _ _, nsmul_eq_mul _ _,
to_ring_hom := nat.cast_ring_hom R }
instance nat_algebra_subsingleton : subsingleton (algebra ℕ R) :=
⟨λ P Q, by { ext, simp, }⟩
end nat
namespace ring_hom
variables {R S : Type*}
/-- Reinterpret a `ring_hom` as an `ℕ`-algebra homomorphism. -/
def to_nat_alg_hom [semiring R] [semiring S] (f : R →+* S) :
R →ₐ[ℕ] S :=
{ to_fun := f, commutes' := λ n, by simp, .. f }
/-- Reinterpret a `ring_hom` as a `ℤ`-algebra homomorphism. -/
def to_int_alg_hom [ring R] [ring S] [algebra ℤ R] [algebra ℤ S] (f : R →+* S) :
R →ₐ[ℤ] S :=
{ commutes' := λ n, by simp, .. f }
-- note that `R`, `S` could be `semiring`s but this is useless mathematically speaking -
-- a ℚ-algebra is a ring. furthermore, this change probably slows down elaboration.
@[simp] lemma map_rat_algebra_map [ring R] [ring S] [algebra ℚ R] [algebra ℚ S]
(f : R →+* S) (r : ℚ) : f (algebra_map ℚ R r) = algebra_map ℚ S r :=
ring_hom.ext_iff.1 (subsingleton.elim (f.comp (algebra_map ℚ R)) (algebra_map ℚ S)) r
/-- Reinterpret a `ring_hom` as a `ℚ`-algebra homomorphism. This actually yields an equivalence,
see `ring_hom.equiv_rat_alg_hom`. -/
def to_rat_alg_hom [ring R] [ring S] [algebra ℚ R] [algebra ℚ S] (f : R →+* S) :
R →ₐ[ℚ] S :=
{ commutes' := f.map_rat_algebra_map, .. f }
@[simp]
lemma to_rat_alg_hom_to_ring_hom [ring R] [ring S] [algebra ℚ R] [algebra ℚ S]
(f : R →+* S) : ↑f.to_rat_alg_hom = f :=
ring_hom.ext $ λ x, rfl
end ring_hom
section
variables {R S : Type*}
@[simp]
lemma alg_hom.to_ring_hom_to_rat_alg_hom [ring R] [ring S] [algebra ℚ R] [algebra ℚ S]
(f : R →ₐ[ℚ] S) : (f : R →+* S).to_rat_alg_hom = f :=
alg_hom.ext $ λ x, rfl
/-- The equivalence between `ring_hom` and `ℚ`-algebra homomorphisms. -/
@[simps]
def ring_hom.equiv_rat_alg_hom [ring R] [ring S] [algebra ℚ R] [algebra ℚ S] :
(R →+* S) ≃ (R →ₐ[ℚ] S) :=
{ to_fun := ring_hom.to_rat_alg_hom,
inv_fun := alg_hom.to_ring_hom,
left_inv := ring_hom.to_rat_alg_hom_to_ring_hom,
right_inv := alg_hom.to_ring_hom_to_rat_alg_hom, }
end
section rat
instance algebra_rat {α} [division_ring α] [char_zero α] : algebra ℚ α :=
(rat.cast_hom α).to_algebra' $ λ r x, r.cast_commute x
@[simp] theorem algebra_map_rat_rat : algebra_map ℚ ℚ = ring_hom.id ℚ :=
subsingleton.elim _ _
-- TODO[gh-6025]: make this an instance once safe to do so
lemma algebra_rat_subsingleton {α} [semiring α] :
subsingleton (algebra ℚ α) :=
⟨λ x y, algebra.algebra_ext x y $ ring_hom.congr_fun $ subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
end rat
namespace algebra
open module
variables (R : Type u) (A : Type v)
variables [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A]
/-- `algebra_map` as an `alg_hom`. -/
def of_id : R →ₐ[R] A :=
{ commutes' := λ _, rfl, .. algebra_map R A }
variables {R}
theorem of_id_apply (r) : of_id R A r = algebra_map R A r := rfl
end algebra
section int
variables (R : Type*) [ring R]
-- Lower the priority so that `algebra.id` is picked most of the time when working with
-- `ℤ`-algebras. This is only an issue since `algebra.id ℤ` and `algebra_int ℤ` are not yet defeq.
-- TODO: fix this by adding an `of_int` field to rings.
/-- Ring ⥤ ℤ-Alg -/
@[priority 99] instance algebra_int : algebra ℤ R :=
{ commutes' := int.cast_commute,
smul_def' := λ _ _, zsmul_eq_mul _ _,
to_ring_hom := int.cast_ring_hom R }
/-- A special case of `ring_hom.eq_int_cast'` that happens to be true definitionally -/
@[simp] lemma algebra_map_int_eq : algebra_map ℤ R = int.cast_ring_hom R := rfl
variables {R}
instance int_algebra_subsingleton : subsingleton (algebra ℤ R) :=
⟨λ P Q, by { ext, simp, }⟩
end int
namespace no_zero_smul_divisors
variables {R A : Type*}
open algebra
/-- If `algebra_map R A` is injective and `A` has no zero divisors,
`R`-multiples in `A` are zero only if one of the factors is zero.
Cannot be an instance because there is no `injective (algebra_map R A)` typeclass.
-/
lemma of_algebra_map_injective
[comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A] [no_zero_divisors A]
(h : function.injective (algebra_map R A)) : no_zero_smul_divisors R A :=
⟨λ c x hcx, (mul_eq_zero.mp ((smul_def c x).symm.trans hcx)).imp_left
(map_eq_zero_iff (algebra_map R A) h).mp⟩
variables (R A)
lemma algebra_map_injective [comm_ring R] [ring A] [nontrivial A]
[algebra R A] [no_zero_smul_divisors R A] :
function.injective (algebra_map R A) :=
suffices function.injective (λ (c : R), c • (1 : A)),
by { convert this, ext, rw [algebra.smul_def, mul_one] },
smul_left_injective R one_ne_zero
variables {R A}
lemma iff_algebra_map_injective [comm_ring R] [ring A] [is_domain A] [algebra R A] :
no_zero_smul_divisors R A ↔ function.injective (algebra_map R A) :=
⟨@@no_zero_smul_divisors.algebra_map_injective R A _ _ _ _,
no_zero_smul_divisors.of_algebra_map_injective⟩
@[priority 100] -- see note [lower instance priority]
instance char_zero.no_zero_smul_divisors_nat [semiring R] [no_zero_divisors R] [char_zero R] :
no_zero_smul_divisors ℕ R :=
no_zero_smul_divisors.of_algebra_map_injective $ (algebra_map ℕ R).injective_nat
@[priority 100] -- see note [lower instance priority]
instance char_zero.no_zero_smul_divisors_int [ring R] [no_zero_divisors R] [char_zero R] :
no_zero_smul_divisors ℤ R :=
no_zero_smul_divisors.of_algebra_map_injective $ (algebra_map ℤ R).injective_int
section field
variables [field R] [semiring A] [algebra R A]
@[priority 100] -- see note [lower instance priority]
instance algebra.no_zero_smul_divisors [nontrivial A] [no_zero_divisors A] :
no_zero_smul_divisors R A :=
no_zero_smul_divisors.of_algebra_map_injective (algebra_map R A).injective
end field
end no_zero_smul_divisors
/-!
The R-algebra structure on `Π i : I, A i` when each `A i` is an R-algebra.
We couldn't set this up back in `algebra.pi_instances` because this file imports it.
-/
namespace pi
variable {I : Type u} -- The indexing type
variable {R : Type*} -- The scalar type
variable {f : I → Type v} -- The family of types already equipped with instances
variables (x y : Π i, f i) (i : I)
variables (I f)
instance algebra {r : comm_semiring R}
[s : ∀ i, semiring (f i)] [∀ i, algebra R (f i)] :
algebra R (Π i : I, f i) :=
{ commutes' := λ a f, begin ext, simp [algebra.commutes], end,
smul_def' := λ a f, begin ext, simp [algebra.smul_def], end,
..(pi.ring_hom (λ i, algebra_map R (f i)) : R →+* Π i : I, f i) }
@[simp] lemma algebra_map_apply {r : comm_semiring R}
[s : ∀ i, semiring (f i)] [∀ i, algebra R (f i)] (a : R) (i : I) :
algebra_map R (Π i, f i) a i = algebra_map R (f i) a := rfl
-- One could also build a `Π i, R i`-algebra structure on `Π i, A i`,
-- when each `A i` is an `R i`-algebra, although I'm not sure that it's useful.
variables {I} (R) (f)
/-- `function.eval` as an `alg_hom`. The name matches `pi.eval_ring_hom`, `pi.eval_monoid_hom`,
etc. -/
@[simps]
def eval_alg_hom {r : comm_semiring R} [Π i, semiring (f i)] [Π i, algebra R (f i)] (i : I) :
(Π i, f i) →ₐ[R] f i :=
{ to_fun := λ f, f i, commutes' := λ r, rfl, .. pi.eval_ring_hom f i}
variables (A B : Type*) [comm_semiring R] [semiring B] [algebra R B]
/-- `function.const` as an `alg_hom`. The name matches `pi.const_ring_hom`, `pi.const_monoid_hom`,
etc. -/
@[simps]
def const_alg_hom : B →ₐ[R] (A → B) :=
{ to_fun := function.const _,
commutes' := λ r, rfl,
.. pi.const_ring_hom A B}
/-- When `R` is commutative and permits an `algebra_map`, `pi.const_ring_hom` is equal to that
map. -/
@[simp] lemma const_ring_hom_eq_algebra_map : const_ring_hom A R = algebra_map R (A → R) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma const_alg_hom_eq_algebra_of_id : const_alg_hom R A R = algebra.of_id R (A → R) :=
rfl
end pi
/-- A special case of `pi.algebra` for non-dependent types. Lean struggles to elaborate
definitions elsewhere in the library without this, -/
instance function.algebra {R : Type*} (I : Type*) (A : Type*) [comm_semiring R]
[semiring A] [algebra R A] : algebra R (I → A) :=
pi.algebra _ _
namespace alg_equiv
/-- A family of algebra equivalences `Π j, (A₁ j ≃ₐ A₂ j)` generates a
multiplicative equivalence between `Π j, A₁ j` and `Π j, A₂ j`.
This is the `alg_equiv` version of `equiv.Pi_congr_right`, and the dependent version of
`alg_equiv.arrow_congr`.
-/
@[simps apply]
def Pi_congr_right {R ι : Type*} {A₁ A₂ : ι → Type*} [comm_semiring R]
[Π i, semiring (A₁ i)] [Π i, semiring (A₂ i)] [Π i, algebra R (A₁ i)] [Π i, algebra R (A₂ i)]
(e : Π i, A₁ i ≃ₐ[R] A₂ i) : (Π i, A₁ i) ≃ₐ[R] Π i, A₂ i :=
{ to_fun := λ x j, e j (x j),
inv_fun := λ x j, (e j).symm (x j),
commutes' := λ r, by { ext i, simp },
.. @ring_equiv.Pi_congr_right ι A₁ A₂ _ _ (λ i, (e i).to_ring_equiv) }
@[simp]
lemma Pi_congr_right_refl {R ι : Type*} {A : ι → Type*} [comm_semiring R]
[Π i, semiring (A i)] [Π i, algebra R (A i)] :
Pi_congr_right (λ i, (alg_equiv.refl : A i ≃ₐ[R] A i)) = alg_equiv.refl := rfl
@[simp]
lemma Pi_congr_right_symm {R ι : Type*} {A₁ A₂ : ι → Type*} [comm_semiring R]
[Π i, semiring (A₁ i)] [Π i, semiring (A₂ i)] [Π i, algebra R (A₁ i)] [Π i, algebra R (A₂ i)]
(e : Π i, A₁ i ≃ₐ[R] A₂ i) : (Pi_congr_right e).symm = (Pi_congr_right $ λ i, (e i).symm) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma Pi_congr_right_trans {R ι : Type*} {A₁ A₂ A₃ : ι → Type*} [comm_semiring R]
[Π i, semiring (A₁ i)] [Π i, semiring (A₂ i)] [Π i, semiring (A₃ i)]
[Π i, algebra R (A₁ i)] [Π i, algebra R (A₂ i)] [Π i, algebra R (A₃ i)]
(e₁ : Π i, A₁ i ≃ₐ[R] A₂ i) (e₂ : Π i, A₂ i ≃ₐ[R] A₃ i) :
(Pi_congr_right e₁).trans (Pi_congr_right e₂) = (Pi_congr_right $ λ i, (e₁ i).trans (e₂ i)) :=
rfl
end alg_equiv
section is_scalar_tower
variables {R : Type*} [comm_semiring R]
variables (A : Type*) [semiring A] [algebra R A]
variables {M : Type*} [add_comm_monoid M] [module A M] [module R M] [is_scalar_tower R A M]
variables {N : Type*} [add_comm_monoid N] [module A N] [module R N] [is_scalar_tower R A N]
lemma algebra_compatible_smul (r : R) (m : M) : r • m = ((algebra_map R A) r) • m :=
by rw [←(one_smul A m), ←smul_assoc, algebra.smul_def, mul_one, one_smul]
@[simp] lemma algebra_map_smul (r : R) (m : M) : ((algebra_map R A) r) • m = r • m :=
(algebra_compatible_smul A r m).symm
lemma no_zero_smul_divisors.trans (R A M : Type*) [comm_ring R] [ring A] [is_domain A] [algebra R A]
[add_comm_group M] [module R M] [module A M] [is_scalar_tower R A M] [no_zero_smul_divisors R A]
[no_zero_smul_divisors A M] : no_zero_smul_divisors R M :=
begin
refine ⟨λ r m h, _⟩,
rw [algebra_compatible_smul A r m] at h,
cases smul_eq_zero.1 h with H H,
{ have : function.injective (algebra_map R A) :=
no_zero_smul_divisors.iff_algebra_map_injective.1 infer_instance,
left,
exact (injective_iff_map_eq_zero _).1 this _ H },
{ right,
exact H }
end
variable {A}
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance is_scalar_tower.to_smul_comm_class : smul_comm_class R A M :=
⟨λ r a m, by rw [algebra_compatible_smul A r (a • m), smul_smul, algebra.commutes, mul_smul,
←algebra_compatible_smul]⟩
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance is_scalar_tower.to_smul_comm_class' : smul_comm_class A R M :=
smul_comm_class.symm _ _ _
lemma smul_algebra_smul_comm (r : R) (a : A) (m : M) : a • r • m = r • a • m :=
smul_comm _ _ _
namespace linear_map
instance coe_is_scalar_tower : has_coe (M →ₗ[A] N) (M →ₗ[R] N) :=
⟨restrict_scalars R⟩
variables (R) {A M N}
@[simp, norm_cast squash] lemma coe_restrict_scalars_eq_coe (f : M →ₗ[A] N) :
(f.restrict_scalars R : M → N) = f := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast squash] lemma coe_coe_is_scalar_tower (f : M →ₗ[A] N) :
((f : M →ₗ[R] N) : M → N) = f := rfl
/-- `A`-linearly coerce a `R`-linear map from `M` to `A` to a function, given an algebra `A` over
a commutative semiring `R` and `M` a module over `R`. -/
def lto_fun (R : Type u) (M : Type v) (A : Type w)
[comm_semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M] [comm_ring A] [algebra R A] :
(M →ₗ[R] A) →ₗ[A] (M → A) :=
{ to_fun := linear_map.to_fun,
map_add' := λ f g, rfl,
map_smul' := λ c f, rfl }
end linear_map
end is_scalar_tower
/-! TODO: The following lemmas no longer involve `algebra` at all, and could be moved closer
to `algebra/module/submodule.lean`. Currently this is tricky because `ker`, `range`, `⊤`, and `⊥`
are all defined in `linear_algebra/basic.lean`. -/
section module
open module
variables (R S M N : Type*) [semiring R] [semiring S] [has_smul R S]
variables [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M] [module S M] [is_scalar_tower R S M]
variables [add_comm_monoid N] [module R N] [module S N] [is_scalar_tower R S N]
variables {S M N}
@[simp]
lemma linear_map.ker_restrict_scalars (f : M →ₗ[S] N) :
(f.restrict_scalars R).ker = f.ker.restrict_scalars R :=
rfl
end module
namespace submodule
variables (R A M : Type*)
variables [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A] [add_comm_monoid M]
variables [module R M] [module A M] [is_scalar_tower R A M]
/-- If `A` is an `R`-algebra such that the induced morhpsim `R →+* A` is surjective, then the
`R`-module generated by a set `X` equals the `A`-module generated by `X`. -/
lemma span_eq_restrict_scalars (X : set M) (hsur : function.surjective (algebra_map R A)) :
span R X = restrict_scalars R (span A X) :=
begin
apply (span_le_restrict_scalars R A X).antisymm (λ m hm, _),
refine span_induction hm subset_span (zero_mem _) (λ _ _, add_mem) (λ a m hm, _),
obtain ⟨r, rfl⟩ := hsur a,
simpa [algebra_map_smul] using smul_mem _ r hm
end
end submodule
namespace alg_hom
variables {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} {I : Type*}
variables [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [semiring B]
variables [algebra R A] [algebra R B]
/-- `R`-algebra homomorphism between the function spaces `I → A` and `I → B`, induced by an
`R`-algebra homomorphism `f` between `A` and `B`. -/
@[simps] protected def comp_left (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (I : Type*) : (I → A) →ₐ[R] (I → B) :=
{ to_fun := λ h, f ∘ h,
commutes' := λ c, by { ext, exact f.commutes' c },
.. f.to_ring_hom.comp_left I }
end alg_hom
example {R A} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[module R A] [smul_comm_class R A A] [is_scalar_tower R A A] : algebra R A :=
algebra.of_module smul_mul_assoc mul_smul_comm
|
c457c8e009bb976b1e315fc60a14888d7d8f7902 | 26ac254ecb57ffcb886ff709cf018390161a9225 | /src/algebra/add_torsor.lean | 1f4ca2104496581a85434d4152b183ca872e7d81 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | eric-wieser/mathlib | 42842584f584359bbe1fc8b88b3ff937c8acd72d | d0df6b81cd0920ad569158c06a3fd5abb9e63301 | refs/heads/master | 1,669,546,404,255 | 1,595,254,668,000 | 1,595,254,668,000 | 281,173,504 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,263,582,000 | 1,595,263,581,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 13,754 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Yury Kudryashov.
-/
import algebra.group.prod
import algebra.group.type_tags
import algebra.pi_instances
import data.equiv.basic
/-!
# Torsors of additive group actions
This file defines torsors of additive group actions.
## Notations
The group elements are referred to as acting on points. This file
defines the notation `+ᵥ` for adding a group element to a point and
`-ᵥ` for subtracting two points to produce a group element.
## Implementation notes
Affine spaces are the motivating example of torsors of additive group
actions. It may be appropriate to refactor in terms of the general
definition of group actions, via `to_additive`, when there is a use
for multiplicative torsors (currently mathlib only develops the theory
of group actions for multiplicative group actions). The variable `G`
is an explicit rather than implicit argument to lemmas because
otherwise the elaborator sometimes has problems inferring appropriate
types and type class instances.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principal_homogeneous_space
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affine_space
-/
/-- Type class for the `+ᵥ` notation. -/
class has_vadd (G : Type*) (P : Type*) :=
(vadd : G → P → P)
/-- Type class for the `-ᵥ` notation. -/
class has_vsub (G : Type*) (P : Type*) :=
(vsub : P → P → G)
infix ` +ᵥ `:65 := has_vadd.vadd
infix ` -ᵥ `:65 := has_vsub.vsub
section prio
set_option default_priority 100 -- see Note [default priority]
set_option old_structure_cmd true
/-- Type class for additive monoid actions. -/
class add_action (G : Type*) (P : Type*) [add_monoid G] extends has_vadd G P :=
(zero_vadd' : ∀ p : P, (0 : G) +ᵥ p = p)
(vadd_assoc' : ∀ (g1 g2 : G) (p : P), g1 +ᵥ (g2 +ᵥ p) = (g1 + g2) +ᵥ p)
/-- An `add_torsor G P` gives a structure to the nonempty type `P`,
acted on by an `add_group G` with a transitive and free action given
by the `+ᵥ` operation and a corresponding subtraction given by the
`-ᵥ` operation. In the case of a vector space, it is an affine
space. -/
class add_torsor (G : Type*) (P : Type*) [add_group G] extends add_action G P, has_vsub G P :=
[nonempty : nonempty P]
(vsub_vadd' : ∀ (p1 p2 : P), (p1 -ᵥ p2 : G) +ᵥ p2 = p1)
(vadd_vsub' : ∀ (g : G) (p : P), g +ᵥ p -ᵥ p = g)
end prio
/-- An `add_group G` is a torsor for itself. -/
instance add_group_is_add_torsor (G : Type*) [add_group G] :
add_torsor G G :=
{ vadd := has_add.add,
vsub := has_sub.sub,
zero_vadd' := zero_add,
vadd_assoc' := λ a b c, (add_assoc a b c).symm,
vsub_vadd' := sub_add_cancel,
vadd_vsub' := add_sub_cancel }
/-- Simplify addition for a torsor for an `add_group G` over
itself. -/
@[simp] lemma vadd_eq_add (G : Type*) [add_group G] (g1 g2 : G) : g1 +ᵥ g2 = g1 + g2 :=
rfl
/-- Simplify subtraction for a torsor for an `add_group G` over
itself. -/
@[simp] lemma vsub_eq_sub (G : Type*) [add_group G] (g1 g2 : G) : g1 -ᵥ g2 = g1 - g2 :=
rfl
namespace add_action
section general
variables (G : Type*) {P : Type*} [add_monoid G] [A : add_action G P]
include A
/-- Adding the zero group element to a point gives the same point. -/
@[simp] lemma zero_vadd (p : P) : (0 : G) +ᵥ p = p :=
zero_vadd' p
/-- Adding two group elements to a point produces the same result as
adding their sum. -/
lemma vadd_assoc (g1 g2 : G) (p : P) : g1 +ᵥ (g2 +ᵥ p) = (g1 + g2) +ᵥ p :=
vadd_assoc' g1 g2 p
end general
section comm
variables (G : Type*) {P : Type*} [add_comm_monoid G] [A : add_action G P]
include A
/-- Adding two group elements to a point produces the same result in either
order. -/
lemma vadd_comm (p : P) (g1 g2 : G) : g1 +ᵥ (g2 +ᵥ p) = g2 +ᵥ (g1 +ᵥ p) :=
by rw [vadd_assoc, vadd_assoc, add_comm]
end comm
section group
variables {G : Type*} {P : Type*} [add_group G] [A : add_action G P]
include A
/-- If the same group element added to two points produces equal results,
those points are equal. -/
lemma vadd_left_cancel {p1 p2 : P} (g : G) (h : g +ᵥ p1 = g +ᵥ p2) : p1 = p2 :=
begin
have h2 : -g +ᵥ (g +ᵥ p1) = -g +ᵥ (g +ᵥ p2), { rw h },
rwa [vadd_assoc, vadd_assoc, add_left_neg, zero_vadd, zero_vadd] at h2
end
@[simp] lemma vadd_left_cancel_iff {p₁ p₂ : P} (g : G) :
g +ᵥ p₁ = g +ᵥ p₂ ↔ p₁ = p₂ :=
⟨vadd_left_cancel g, λ h, h ▸ rfl⟩
end group
end add_action
namespace add_torsor
open add_action
section general
variables (G : Type*) {P : Type*} [add_group G] [T : add_torsor G P]
include T
/-- Adding the result of subtracting from another point produces that
point. -/
@[simp] lemma vsub_vadd (p1 p2 : P) : (p1 -ᵥ p2 : G) +ᵥ p2 = p1 :=
vsub_vadd' p1 p2
/-- Adding a group element then subtracting the original point
produces that group element. -/
@[simp] lemma vadd_vsub (g : G) (p : P) : g +ᵥ p -ᵥ p = g :=
vadd_vsub' g p
variable {G}
/-- If the same point added to two group elements produces equal
results, those group elements are equal. -/
lemma vadd_right_cancel {g1 g2 : G} (p : P) (h : g1 +ᵥ p = g2 +ᵥ p) : g1 = g2 :=
by rw [←vadd_vsub G g1, h, vadd_vsub]
@[simp] lemma vadd_right_cancel_iff {g1 g2 : G} (p : P) : g1 +ᵥ p = g2 +ᵥ p ↔ g1 = g2 :=
⟨vadd_right_cancel p, λ h, h ▸ rfl⟩
/-- Adding a group element to a point, then subtracting another point,
produces the same result as subtracting the points then adding the
group element. -/
lemma vadd_vsub_assoc (g : G) (p1 p2 : P) : g +ᵥ p1 -ᵥ p2 = g + (p1 -ᵥ p2) :=
begin
apply vadd_right_cancel p2,
rw [vsub_vadd, ←vadd_assoc, vsub_vadd]
end
variable (G)
/-- Subtracting a point from itself produces 0. -/
@[simp] lemma vsub_self (p : P) : p -ᵥ p = (0 : G) :=
by rw [←zero_add (p -ᵥ p : G), ←vadd_vsub_assoc, vadd_vsub]
/-- If subtracting two points produces 0, they are equal. -/
lemma eq_of_vsub_eq_zero {p1 p2 : P} (h : p1 -ᵥ p2 = (0 : G)) : p1 = p2 :=
by rw [←vsub_vadd G p1 p2, h, zero_vadd]
/-- Subtracting two points produces 0 if and only if they are
equal. -/
@[simp] lemma vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq {p1 p2 : P} : p1 -ᵥ p2 = (0 : G) ↔ p1 = p2 :=
iff.intro (eq_of_vsub_eq_zero G) (λ h, h ▸ vsub_self G _)
/-- Cancellation adding the results of two subtractions. -/
@[simp] lemma vsub_add_vsub_cancel (p1 p2 p3 : P) : (p1 -ᵥ p2 : G) + (p2 -ᵥ p3) = (p1 -ᵥ p3) :=
begin
apply vadd_right_cancel p3,
rw [←vadd_assoc, vsub_vadd, vsub_vadd, vsub_vadd]
end
/-- Subtracting two points in the reverse order produces the negation
of subtracting them. -/
@[simp] lemma neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev (p1 p2 : P) : -(p1 -ᵥ p2) = (p2 -ᵥ p1 : G) :=
begin
refine neg_eq_of_add_eq_zero (vadd_right_cancel p1 _),
rw [vsub_add_vsub_cancel, vsub_self],
end
/-- Subtracting the result of adding a group element produces the same result
as subtracting the points and subtracting that group element. -/
lemma vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub (p1 p2 : P) (g : G) : p1 -ᵥ (g +ᵥ p2) = (p1 -ᵥ p2) - g :=
by rw [←add_right_inj (p2 -ᵥ p1 : G), vsub_add_vsub_cancel, ←neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, vadd_vsub,
←add_sub_assoc, ←neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_add_self, zero_sub]
/-- Cancellation subtracting the results of two subtractions. -/
@[simp] lemma vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right (p1 p2 p3 : P) :
(p1 -ᵥ p3 : G) - (p2 -ᵥ p3) = (p1 -ᵥ p2) :=
by rw [←vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vsub_vadd]
/-- The pairwise differences of a set of points. -/
def vsub_set (s : set P) : set G := {g | ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, g = x -ᵥ y}
/-- `vsub_set` of an empty set. -/
@[simp] lemma vsub_set_empty : vsub_set G (∅ : set P) = ∅ :=
begin
rw set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem,
rintros g ⟨p, hp, hg⟩,
exact hp
end
/-- Each pairwise difference is in the `vsub_set`. -/
lemma vsub_mem_vsub_set {p1 p2 : P} {s : set P} (hp1 : p1 ∈ s) (hp2 : p2 ∈ s) :
(p1 -ᵥ p2) ∈ vsub_set G s :=
⟨p1, hp1, p2, hp2, rfl⟩
/-- `vsub_set` is contained in `vsub_set` of a larger set. -/
lemma vsub_set_mono {s1 s2 : set P} (h : s1 ⊆ s2) : vsub_set G s1 ⊆ vsub_set G s2 :=
begin
rintros v ⟨p1, hp1, p2, hp2, hv⟩,
exact ⟨p1, set.mem_of_mem_of_subset hp1 h, p2, set.mem_of_mem_of_subset hp2 h, hv⟩
end
@[simp] lemma vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_right (v₁ v₂ : G) (p : P) :
((v₁ +ᵥ p) -ᵥ (v₂ +ᵥ p) : G) = v₁ - v₂ :=
by rw [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_self, add_zero]
/-- If the same point subtracted from two points produces equal
results, those points are equal. -/
lemma vsub_left_cancel {p1 p2 p : P} (h : (p1 -ᵥ p : G) = p2 -ᵥ p) : p1 = p2 :=
by rwa [←sub_eq_zero, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right, vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
/-- The same point subtracted from two points produces equal results
if and only if those points are equal. -/
@[simp] lemma vsub_left_cancel_iff {p1 p2 p : P} : (p1 -ᵥ p : G) = p2 -ᵥ p ↔ p1 = p2 :=
⟨vsub_left_cancel _, λ h, h ▸ rfl⟩
/-- If subtracting two points from the same point produces equal
results, those points are equal. -/
lemma vsub_right_cancel {p1 p2 p : P} (h : (p -ᵥ p1 : G) = p -ᵥ p2) : p1 = p2 :=
begin
have h2 : (p -ᵥ p2 : G) +ᵥ p1 = (p -ᵥ p1 : G) +ᵥ p1, { rw h },
conv_rhs at h2 {
rw [vsub_vadd, ←vsub_vadd G p p2],
},
rwa vadd_left_cancel_iff at h2
end
/-- Subtracting two points from the same point produces equal results
if and only if those points are equal. -/
@[simp] lemma vsub_right_cancel_iff {p1 p2 p : P} : (p -ᵥ p1 : G) = p -ᵥ p2 ↔ p1 = p2 :=
⟨vsub_right_cancel _, λ h, h ▸ rfl⟩
end general
section comm
variables (G : Type*) {P : Type*} [add_comm_group G] [add_torsor G P]
/-- Cancellation subtracting the results of two subtractions. -/
@[simp] lemma vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left (p1 p2 p3 : P) :
(p3 -ᵥ p2 : G) - (p3 -ᵥ p1) = (p1 -ᵥ p2) :=
by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, add_comm, vsub_add_vsub_cancel]
@[simp] lemma vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_left (v : G) (p1 p2 : P) :
((v +ᵥ p1) -ᵥ (v +ᵥ p2) : G) = p1 -ᵥ p2 :=
by rw [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vadd_vsub_assoc, add_sub_cancel']
end comm
end add_torsor
namespace prod
variables {G : Type*} {P : Type*} {G' : Type*} {P' : Type*} [add_group G] [add_group G']
[add_torsor G P] [add_torsor G' P']
instance : add_torsor (G × G') (P × P') :=
{ vadd := λ v p, (v.1 +ᵥ p.1, v.2 +ᵥ p.2),
zero_vadd' := λ p, by simp,
vadd_assoc' := by simp [add_action.vadd_assoc],
vsub := λ p₁ p₂, (p₁.1 -ᵥ p₂.1, p₁.2 -ᵥ p₂.2),
nonempty := @prod.nonempty _ _ (add_torsor.nonempty G) (add_torsor.nonempty G'),
vsub_vadd' := λ p₁ p₂, show (p₁.1 -ᵥ p₂.1 +ᵥ p₂.1, _) = p₁, by simp,
vadd_vsub' := λ v p, show (v.1 +ᵥ p.1 -ᵥ p.1, v.2 +ᵥ p.2 -ᵥ p.2) =v, by simp }
@[simp] lemma fst_vadd (v : G × G') (p : P × P') : (v +ᵥ p).1 = v.1 +ᵥ p.1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma snd_vadd (v : G × G') (p : P × P') : (v +ᵥ p).2 = v.2 +ᵥ p.2 := rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_vadd_mk (v : G) (v' : G') (p : P) (p' : P') :
(v, v') +ᵥ (p, p') = (v +ᵥ p, v' +ᵥ p') := rfl
@[simp] lemma fst_vsub (p₁ p₂ : P × P') : (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ : G × G').1 = p₁.1 -ᵥ p₂.1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma snd_vsub (p₁ p₂ : P × P') : (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ : G × G').2 = p₁.2 -ᵥ p₂.2 := rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_vsub_mk (p₁ p₂ : P) (p₁' p₂' : P') :
((p₁, p₁') -ᵥ (p₂, p₂') : G × G') = (p₁ -ᵥ p₂, p₁' -ᵥ p₂') := rfl
end prod
namespace pi
universes u v w
variables {I : Type u} {fg : I → Type v} [∀ i, add_group (fg i)] {fp : I → Type w}
open add_action add_torsor
/-- A product of `add_torsor`s is an `add_torsor`. -/
instance [T : ∀ i, add_torsor (fg i) (fp i)] : add_torsor (Π i, fg i) (Π i, fp i) :=
{
vadd := λ g p, λ i, g i +ᵥ p i,
zero_vadd' := λ p, funext $ λ i, zero_vadd (fg i) (p i),
vadd_assoc' := λ g₁ g₂ p, funext $ λ i, vadd_assoc (fg i) (g₁ i) (g₂ i) (p i),
vsub := λ p₁ p₂, λ i, p₁ i -ᵥ p₂ i,
nonempty := ⟨λ i, classical.choice (T i).nonempty⟩,
vsub_vadd' := λ p₁ p₂, funext $ λ i, vsub_vadd (fg i) (p₁ i) (p₂ i),
vadd_vsub' := λ g p, funext $ λ i, vadd_vsub (fg i) (g i) (p i),
}
/-- Addition in a product of `add_torsor`s. -/
@[simp] lemma vadd_apply [T : ∀ i, add_torsor (fg i) (fp i)] (x : Π i, fg i) (y : Π i, fp i)
{i : I} : (x +ᵥ y) i = x i +ᵥ y i
:= rfl
end pi
namespace equiv
variables (G : Type*) {P : Type*} [add_group G] [add_torsor G P]
open add_action add_torsor
/-- `v ↦ v +ᵥ p` as an equivalence. -/
def vadd_const (p : P) : G ≃ P :=
{ to_fun := λ v, v +ᵥ p,
inv_fun := λ p', p' -ᵥ p,
left_inv := λ v, vadd_vsub _ _ _,
right_inv := λ p', vsub_vadd _ _ _ }
@[simp] lemma coe_vadd_const (p : P) : ⇑(vadd_const G p) = λ v, v+ᵥ p := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_vadd_const_symm (p : P) : ⇑(vadd_const G p).symm = λ p', p' -ᵥ p := rfl
variables {G} (P)
/-- The permutation given by `p ↦ v +ᵥ p`. -/
def const_vadd (v : G) : equiv.perm P :=
{ to_fun := (+ᵥ) v,
inv_fun := (+ᵥ) (-v),
left_inv := λ p, by simp [vadd_assoc],
right_inv := λ p, by simp [vadd_assoc] }
@[simp] lemma coe_const_vadd (v : G) : ⇑(const_vadd P v) = (+ᵥ) v := rfl
variable (G)
@[simp] lemma const_vadd_zero : const_vadd P (0:G) = 1 := ext $ zero_vadd G
variable {G}
@[simp] lemma const_vadd_add (v₁ v₂ : G) :
const_vadd P (v₁ + v₂) = const_vadd P v₁ * const_vadd P v₂ :=
ext $ λ p, (vadd_assoc G v₁ v₂ p).symm
/-- `equiv.const_vadd` as a homomorphism from `multiplicative G` to `equiv.perm P` -/
def const_vadd_hom : multiplicative G →* equiv.perm P :=
{ to_fun := λ v, const_vadd P v.to_add,
map_one' := const_vadd_zero G P,
map_mul' := const_vadd_add P }
end equiv
|
f14967ae792f642dcc74c79c7550cf3b79e831e0 | 9dc8cecdf3c4634764a18254e94d43da07142918 | /src/measure_theory/group/prod.lean | c10d86f822fde5bb781e8f6e656e41384299a194 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcommelin/mathlib | d8456447c36c176e14d96d9e76f39841f69d2d9b | ee8279351a2e434c2852345c51b728d22af5a156 | refs/heads/master | 1,664,782,136,488 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 132,563,656 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,663,599,929,000 | 1,525,760,539,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 16,794 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import measure_theory.constructions.prod
import measure_theory.group.measure
/-!
# Measure theory in the product of groups
In this file we show properties about measure theory in products of measurable groups
and properties of iterated integrals in measurable groups.
These lemmas show the uniqueness of left invariant measures on measurable groups, up to
scaling. In this file we follow the proof and refer to the book *Measure Theory* by Paul Halmos.
The idea of the proof is to use the translation invariance of measures to prove `μ(F) = c * μ(E)`
for two sets `E` and `F`, where `c` is a constant that does not depend on `μ`. Let `e` and `f` be
the characteristic functions of `E` and `F`.
Assume that `μ` and `ν` are left-invariant measures. Then the map `(x, y) ↦ (y * x, x⁻¹)`
preserves the measure `μ.prod ν`, which means that
```
∫ x, ∫ y, h x y ∂ν ∂μ = ∫ x, ∫ y, h (y * x) x⁻¹ ∂ν ∂μ
```
If we apply this to `h x y := e x * f y⁻¹ / ν ((λ h, h * y⁻¹) ⁻¹' E)`, we can rewrite the RHS to
`μ(F)`, and the LHS to `c * μ(E)`, where `c = c(ν)` does not depend on `μ`.
Applying this to `μ` and to `ν` gives `μ (F) / μ (E) = ν (F) / ν (E)`, which is the uniqueness up to
scalar multiplication.
The proof in [Halmos] seems to contain an omission in §60 Th. A, see
`measure_theory.measure_lintegral_div_measure`.
-/
noncomputable theory
open set (hiding prod_eq) function measure_theory filter (hiding map)
open_locale classical ennreal pointwise measure_theory
variables (G : Type*) [measurable_space G]
variables [group G] [has_measurable_mul₂ G]
variables (μ ν : measure G) [sigma_finite ν] [sigma_finite μ] {E : set G}
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` as a `measurable_equiv`. This is a shear mapping. -/
@[to_additive "The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, x + y)` as a `measurable_equiv`.
This is a shear mapping."]
protected def measurable_equiv.shear_mul_right [has_measurable_inv G] : G × G ≃ᵐ G × G :=
{ measurable_to_fun := measurable_fst.prod_mk measurable_mul,
measurable_inv_fun := measurable_fst.prod_mk $ measurable_fst.inv.mul measurable_snd,
.. equiv.prod_shear (equiv.refl _) equiv.mul_left }
variables {G}
namespace measure_theory
open measure
/-- A shear mapping preserves the measure `μ.prod ν`.
This condition is part of the definition of a measurable group in [Halmos, §59].
There, the map in this lemma is called `S`. -/
@[to_additive map_prod_add_eq /-" An additive shear mapping preserves the measure `μ.prod ν`. "-/]
lemma map_prod_mul_eq [is_mul_left_invariant ν] :
map (λ z : G × G, (z.1, z.1 * z.2)) (μ.prod ν) = μ.prod ν :=
((measure_preserving.id μ).skew_product measurable_mul
(filter.eventually_of_forall $ map_mul_left_eq_self ν)).map_eq
/-- The function we are mapping along is `SR` in [Halmos, §59],
where `S` is the map in `map_prod_mul_eq` and `R` is `prod.swap`. -/
@[to_additive map_prod_add_eq_swap /-" "-/]
lemma map_prod_mul_eq_swap [is_mul_left_invariant μ] :
map (λ z : G × G, (z.2, z.2 * z.1)) (μ.prod ν) = ν.prod μ :=
begin
rw [← prod_swap],
simp_rw [map_map (measurable_snd.prod_mk (measurable_snd.mul measurable_fst)) measurable_swap],
exact map_prod_mul_eq ν μ
end
@[to_additive]
lemma measurable_measure_mul_right (hE : measurable_set E) :
measurable (λ x, μ ((λ y, y * x) ⁻¹' E)) :=
begin
suffices : measurable (λ y,
μ ((λ x, (x, y)) ⁻¹' ((λ z : G × G, ((1 : G), z.1 * z.2)) ⁻¹' (univ ×ˢ E)))),
{ convert this, ext1 x, congr' 1 with y : 1, simp },
apply measurable_measure_prod_mk_right,
exact measurable_const.prod_mk (measurable_fst.mul measurable_snd) (measurable_set.univ.prod hE)
end
variables [has_measurable_inv G]
/-- The function we are mapping along is `S⁻¹` in [Halmos, §59],
where `S` is the map in `map_prod_mul_eq`. -/
@[to_additive map_prod_neg_add_eq "The function we are mapping along is `-S` in [Halmos, §59], where
`S` is the map in `map_prod_add_eq`."]
lemma map_prod_inv_mul_eq [is_mul_left_invariant ν] :
map (λ z : G × G, (z.1, z.1⁻¹ * z.2)) (μ.prod ν) = μ.prod ν :=
(measurable_equiv.shear_mul_right G).map_apply_eq_iff_map_symm_apply_eq.mp $ map_prod_mul_eq μ ν
@[to_additive]
lemma quasi_measure_preserving_div [is_mul_right_invariant μ] :
quasi_measure_preserving (λ (p : G × G), p.1 / p.2) (μ.prod μ) μ :=
begin
refine quasi_measure_preserving.prod_of_left measurable_div _,
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv],
apply eventually_of_forall,
refine λ y, ⟨measurable_mul_const y⁻¹, (map_mul_right_eq_self μ y⁻¹).absolutely_continuous⟩
end
variables [is_mul_left_invariant μ]
/-- The function we are mapping along is `S⁻¹R` in [Halmos, §59],
where `S` is the map in `map_prod_mul_eq` and `R` is `prod.swap`. -/
@[to_additive map_prod_neg_add_eq_swap "The function we are mapping along is `-S + R` in
[Halmos, §59], where `S` is the map in `map_prod_add_eq` and `R` is `prod.swap`."]
lemma map_prod_inv_mul_eq_swap : map (λ z : G × G, (z.2, z.2⁻¹ * z.1)) (μ.prod ν) = ν.prod μ :=
begin
rw [← prod_swap],
simp_rw
[map_map (measurable_snd.prod_mk $ measurable_snd.inv.mul measurable_fst) measurable_swap],
exact map_prod_inv_mul_eq ν μ
end
/-- The function we are mapping along is `S⁻¹RSR` in [Halmos, §59],
where `S` is the map in `map_prod_mul_eq` and `R` is `prod.swap`. -/
@[to_additive map_prod_add_neg_eq "The function we are mapping along is `-S + R + S + R ` in
[Halmos, §59], where `S` is the map in `map_prod_add_eq` and `R` is `prod.swap`."]
lemma map_prod_mul_inv_eq [is_mul_left_invariant ν] :
map (λ z : G × G, (z.2 * z.1, z.1⁻¹)) (μ.prod ν) = μ.prod ν :=
begin
suffices : map ((λ z : G × G, (z.2, z.2⁻¹ * z.1)) ∘ (λ z : G × G, (z.2, z.2 * z.1))) (μ.prod ν) =
μ.prod ν,
{ convert this, ext1 ⟨x, y⟩, simp },
simp_rw [← map_map (measurable_snd.prod_mk (measurable_snd.inv.mul measurable_fst))
(measurable_snd.prod_mk (measurable_snd.mul measurable_fst)), map_prod_mul_eq_swap μ ν,
map_prod_inv_mul_eq_swap ν μ]
end
@[to_additive] lemma quasi_measure_preserving_inv :
quasi_measure_preserving (has_inv.inv : G → G) μ μ :=
begin
refine ⟨measurable_inv, absolutely_continuous.mk $ λ s hsm hμs, _⟩,
rw [map_apply measurable_inv hsm, inv_preimage],
have hf : measurable (λ z : G × G, (z.2 * z.1, z.1⁻¹)) :=
(measurable_snd.mul measurable_fst).prod_mk measurable_fst.inv,
suffices : map (λ z : G × G, (z.2 * z.1, z.1⁻¹)) (μ.prod μ) (s⁻¹ ×ˢ s⁻¹) = 0,
{ simpa only [map_prod_mul_inv_eq μ μ, prod_prod, mul_eq_zero, or_self] using this },
have hsm' : measurable_set (s⁻¹ ×ˢ s⁻¹) := hsm.inv.prod hsm.inv,
simp_rw [map_apply hf hsm', prod_apply_symm (hf hsm'), preimage_preimage, mk_preimage_prod,
inv_preimage, inv_inv, measure_mono_null (inter_subset_right _ _) hμs, lintegral_zero]
end
@[to_additive]
lemma map_inv_absolutely_continuous : map has_inv.inv μ ≪ μ :=
(quasi_measure_preserving_inv μ).absolutely_continuous
@[to_additive]
lemma measure_inv_null : μ E⁻¹ = 0 ↔ μ E = 0 :=
begin
refine ⟨λ hE, _, (quasi_measure_preserving_inv μ).preimage_null⟩,
convert (quasi_measure_preserving_inv μ).preimage_null hE,
exact (inv_inv _).symm
end
@[to_additive]
lemma absolutely_continuous_map_inv : μ ≪ map has_inv.inv μ :=
begin
refine absolutely_continuous.mk (λ s hs, _),
simp_rw [map_apply measurable_inv hs, inv_preimage, measure_inv_null, imp_self]
end
@[to_additive]
lemma lintegral_lintegral_mul_inv [is_mul_left_invariant ν]
(f : G → G → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : ae_measurable (uncurry f) (μ.prod ν)) :
∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y, f (y * x) x⁻¹ ∂ν ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y, f x y ∂ν ∂μ :=
begin
have h : measurable (λ z : G × G, (z.2 * z.1, z.1⁻¹)) :=
(measurable_snd.mul measurable_fst).prod_mk measurable_fst.inv,
have h2f : ae_measurable (uncurry $ λ x y, f (y * x) x⁻¹) (μ.prod ν),
{ apply hf.comp_measurable' h (map_prod_mul_inv_eq μ ν).absolutely_continuous },
simp_rw [lintegral_lintegral h2f, lintegral_lintegral hf],
conv_rhs { rw [← map_prod_mul_inv_eq μ ν] },
symmetry,
exact lintegral_map' (hf.mono' (map_prod_mul_inv_eq μ ν).absolutely_continuous) h.ae_measurable,
end
@[to_additive]
lemma measure_mul_right_null (y : G) :
μ ((λ x, x * y) ⁻¹' E) = 0 ↔ μ E = 0 :=
calc μ ((λ x, x * y) ⁻¹' E) = 0 ↔ μ ((λ x, y⁻¹ * x) ⁻¹' E⁻¹)⁻¹ = 0 :
by simp_rw [← inv_preimage, preimage_preimage, mul_inv_rev, inv_inv]
... ↔ μ E = 0 : by simp only [measure_inv_null μ, measure_preimage_mul]
@[to_additive]
lemma measure_mul_right_ne_zero
(h2E : μ E ≠ 0) (y : G) : μ ((λ x, x * y) ⁻¹' E) ≠ 0 :=
(not_iff_not_of_iff (measure_mul_right_null μ y)).mpr h2E
@[to_additive] lemma quasi_measure_preserving_mul_right (g : G) :
quasi_measure_preserving (λ h : G, h * g) μ μ :=
begin
refine ⟨measurable_mul_const g, absolutely_continuous.mk $ λ s hs, _⟩,
rw [map_apply (measurable_mul_const g) hs, measure_mul_right_null], exact id,
end
@[to_additive]
lemma map_mul_right_absolutely_continuous (g : G) : map (* g) μ ≪ μ :=
(quasi_measure_preserving_mul_right μ g).absolutely_continuous
@[to_additive]
lemma absolutely_continuous_map_mul_right (g : G) : μ ≪ map (* g) μ :=
begin
refine absolutely_continuous.mk (λ s hs, _),
rw [map_apply (measurable_mul_const g) hs, measure_mul_right_null], exact id
end
@[to_additive] lemma quasi_measure_preserving_div_left (g : G) :
quasi_measure_preserving (λ h : G, g / h) μ μ :=
begin
refine ⟨measurable_const.div measurable_id, _⟩,
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv],
rw [← map_map (measurable_const_mul g) measurable_inv],
refine ((map_inv_absolutely_continuous μ).map $ measurable_const_mul g).trans _,
rw [map_mul_left_eq_self],
end
@[to_additive]
lemma map_div_left_absolutely_continuous (g : G) : map (λ h, g / h) μ ≪ μ :=
(quasi_measure_preserving_div_left μ g).absolutely_continuous
@[to_additive]
lemma absolutely_continuous_map_div_left (g : G) : μ ≪ map (λ h, g / h) μ :=
begin
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv],
rw [← map_map (measurable_const_mul g) measurable_inv],
conv_lhs { rw [← map_mul_left_eq_self μ g] },
exact (absolutely_continuous_map_inv μ).map (measurable_const_mul g)
end
/-- This is the computation performed in the proof of [Halmos, §60 Th. A]. -/
@[to_additive "This is the computation performed in the proof of [Halmos, §60 Th. A]."]
lemma measure_mul_lintegral_eq
[is_mul_left_invariant ν] (Em : measurable_set E) (f : G → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : measurable f) :
μ E * ∫⁻ y, f y ∂ν = ∫⁻ x, ν ((λ z, z * x) ⁻¹' E) * f (x⁻¹) ∂μ :=
begin
rw [← set_lintegral_one, ← lintegral_indicator _ Em,
← lintegral_lintegral_mul (measurable_const.indicator Em).ae_measurable hf.ae_measurable,
← lintegral_lintegral_mul_inv μ ν],
swap, { exact (((measurable_const.indicator Em).comp measurable_fst).mul
(hf.comp measurable_snd)).ae_measurable },
have mE : ∀ x : G, measurable (λ y, ((λ z, z * x) ⁻¹' E).indicator (λ z, (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) y) :=
λ x, measurable_const.indicator (measurable_mul_const _ Em),
have : ∀ x y, E.indicator (λ (z : G), (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) (y * x) =
((λ z, z * x) ⁻¹' E).indicator (λ (b : G), 1) y,
{ intros x y, symmetry, convert indicator_comp_right (λ y, y * x), ext1 z, refl },
simp_rw [this, lintegral_mul_const _ (mE _), lintegral_indicator _ (measurable_mul_const _ Em),
set_lintegral_one],
end
/-- Any two nonzero left-invariant measures are absolutely continuous w.r.t. each other. -/
@[to_additive /-" Any two nonzero left-invariant measures are absolutely continuous w.r.t. each
other. "-/]
lemma absolutely_continuous_of_is_mul_left_invariant [is_mul_left_invariant ν] (hν : ν ≠ 0) :
μ ≪ ν :=
begin
refine absolutely_continuous.mk (λ E Em hνE, _),
have h1 := measure_mul_lintegral_eq μ ν Em 1 measurable_one,
simp_rw [pi.one_apply, lintegral_one, mul_one, (measure_mul_right_null ν _).mpr hνE,
lintegral_zero, mul_eq_zero, measure_univ_eq_zero.not.mpr hν, or_false] at h1,
exact h1
end
@[to_additive]
lemma ae_measure_preimage_mul_right_lt_top [is_mul_left_invariant ν]
(Em : measurable_set E) (hμE : μ E ≠ ∞) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ν ((λ y, y * x) ⁻¹' E) < ∞ :=
begin
refine ae_of_forall_measure_lt_top_ae_restrict' ν.inv _ _,
intros A hA h2A h3A,
simp only [ν.inv_apply] at h3A,
apply ae_lt_top (measurable_measure_mul_right ν Em),
have h1 := measure_mul_lintegral_eq μ ν Em (A⁻¹.indicator 1) (measurable_one.indicator hA.inv),
rw [lintegral_indicator _ hA.inv] at h1,
simp_rw [pi.one_apply, set_lintegral_one, ← image_inv, indicator_image inv_injective, image_inv,
← indicator_mul_right _ (λ x, ν ((λ y, y * x) ⁻¹' E)), function.comp, pi.one_apply,
mul_one] at h1,
rw [← lintegral_indicator _ hA, ← h1],
exact ennreal.mul_ne_top hμE h3A.ne,
end
@[to_additive]
lemma ae_measure_preimage_mul_right_lt_top_of_ne_zero [is_mul_left_invariant ν]
(Em : measurable_set E) (h2E : ν E ≠ 0) (h3E : ν E ≠ ∞) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ν ((λ y, y * x) ⁻¹' E) < ∞ :=
begin
refine (ae_measure_preimage_mul_right_lt_top ν ν Em h3E).filter_mono _,
refine (absolutely_continuous_of_is_mul_left_invariant μ ν _).ae_le,
refine mt _ h2E,
intro hν,
rw [hν, measure.coe_zero, pi.zero_apply]
end
/-- A technical lemma relating two different measures. This is basically [Halmos, §60 Th. A].
Note that if `f` is the characteristic function of a measurable set `F` this states that
`μ F = c * μ E` for a constant `c` that does not depend on `μ`.
Note: There is a gap in the last step of the proof in [Halmos].
In the last line, the equality `g(x⁻¹)ν(Ex⁻¹) = f(x)` holds if we can prove that
`0 < ν(Ex⁻¹) < ∞`. The first inequality follows from §59, Th. D, but the second inequality is
not justified. We prove this inequality for almost all `x` in
`measure_theory.ae_measure_preimage_mul_right_lt_top_of_ne_zero`. -/
@[to_additive "A technical lemma relating two different measures. This is basically
[Halmos, §60 Th. A]. Note that if `f` is the characteristic function of a measurable set `F` this
states that `μ F = c * μ E` for a constant `c` that does not depend on `μ`.
Note: There is a gap in the last step of the proof in [Halmos]. In the last line, the equality
`g(-x) + ν(E - x) = f(x)` holds if we can prove that `0 < ν(E - x) < ∞`. The first inequality
follows from §59, Th. D, but the second inequality is not justified. We prove this inequality for
almost all `x` in `measure_theory.ae_measure_preimage_add_right_lt_top_of_ne_zero`."]
lemma measure_lintegral_div_measure [is_mul_left_invariant ν]
(Em : measurable_set E) (h2E : ν E ≠ 0) (h3E : ν E ≠ ∞)
(f : G → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : measurable f) :
μ E * ∫⁻ y, f y⁻¹ / ν ((λ x, x * y⁻¹) ⁻¹' E) ∂ν = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ :=
begin
set g := λ y, f y⁻¹ / ν ((λ x, x * y⁻¹) ⁻¹' E),
have hg : measurable g := (hf.comp measurable_inv).div
((measurable_measure_mul_right ν Em).comp measurable_inv),
simp_rw [measure_mul_lintegral_eq μ ν Em g hg, g, inv_inv],
refine lintegral_congr_ae _,
refine (ae_measure_preimage_mul_right_lt_top_of_ne_zero μ ν Em h2E h3E).mono (λ x hx , _),
simp_rw [ennreal.mul_div_cancel' (measure_mul_right_ne_zero ν h2E _) hx.ne]
end
@[to_additive]
lemma measure_mul_measure_eq [is_mul_left_invariant ν] {E F : set G}
(hE : measurable_set E) (hF : measurable_set F) (h2E : ν E ≠ 0) (h3E : ν E ≠ ∞) :
μ E * ν F = ν E * μ F :=
begin
have h1 := measure_lintegral_div_measure ν ν hE h2E h3E (F.indicator (λ x, 1))
(measurable_const.indicator hF),
have h2 := measure_lintegral_div_measure μ ν hE h2E h3E (F.indicator (λ x, 1))
(measurable_const.indicator hF),
rw [lintegral_indicator _ hF, set_lintegral_one] at h1 h2,
rw [← h1, mul_left_comm, h2],
end
/-- Left invariant Borel measures on a measurable group are unique (up to a scalar). -/
@[to_additive /-" Left invariant Borel measures on an additive measurable group are unique
(up to a scalar). "-/]
lemma measure_eq_div_smul [is_mul_left_invariant ν]
(hE : measurable_set E) (h2E : ν E ≠ 0) (h3E : ν E ≠ ∞) : μ = (μ E / ν E) • ν :=
begin
ext1 F hF,
rw [smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm, ← mul_div_assoc, mul_comm,
measure_mul_measure_eq μ ν hE hF h2E h3E, mul_div_assoc, ennreal.mul_div_cancel' h2E h3E]
end
end measure_theory
|
e6cc130c28c14b6f51a0ecfa5aa9717ca1c541af | ea5678cc400c34ff95b661fa26d15024e27ea8cd | /alternating_teest.lean | 49c4c1f3b4d6e37acd4ea2d086364fe7e2c007b1 | [] | no_license | ChrisHughes24/leanstuff | dca0b5349c3ed893e8792ffbd98cbcadaff20411 | 9efa85f72efaccd1d540385952a6acc18fce8687 | refs/heads/master | 1,654,883,241,759 | 1,652,873,885,000 | 1,652,873,885,000 | 134,599,537 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,135 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import group_theory.perm group_theory.order_of_element group_theory.quotient_group
universes u v
open finset is_subgroup equiv equiv.perm quotient_group
instance {α β : Type*} [group α] [group β] [decidable_eq β] (f : α → β) [is_group_hom f] :
decidable_pred (is_group_hom.ker f) :=
λ _, decidable_of_iff _ (is_group_hom.mem_ker f).symm
def alternating (α : Type*) [decidable_eq α] [fintype α] : Type* :=
is_group_hom.ker (sign : perm α → units ℤ)
/- not definitionally equal to `subtype.decidable_eq`, since `subtype.decidable_eq` does
not reduce in the kernel -/
instance (α : Type*) [decidable_eq α] [fintype α] : decidable_eq (alternating α) :=
λ a b, decidable_of_iff (a.1 = b.1) (by cases a; cases b; simp [subtype.mk.inj_eq])
instance (α : Type*) [decidable_eq α] [fintype α] : fintype (alternating α) :=
set_fintype _
instance (α : Type*) [decidable_eq α] [fintype α] : group (alternating α) :=
by unfold alternating; apply_instance
section classical
local attribute [instance] classical.prop_decidable
lemma card_alternating (α : Type*) [decidable_eq α] [fintype α] (h : 2 ≤ fintype.card α):
fintype.card (alternating α) * 2 = (fintype.card α).fact :=
have (quotient_group.quotient (is_group_hom.ker (sign : perm α → units ℤ))) ≃ units ℤ,
from quotient_ker_equiv_of_surjective _ (sign_surjective h),
calc fintype.card (alternating α) * 2 = fintype.card (units ℤ × alternating α) :
by rw [mul_comm, fintype.card_prod, fintype.card_units_int]
... = fintype.card (perm α) : fintype.card_congr
(calc (units ℤ × alternating α) ≃
(quotient_group.quotient (is_group_hom.ker (sign : perm α → units ℤ)) × alternating α) :
equiv.prod_congr this.symm (by refl)
... ≃ perm α : (group_equiv_quotient_times_subgroup _).symm)
... = (fintype.card α).fact : fintype.card_perm
end classical
local notation `A5` := alternating (fin 5)
variables {α : Type*} [fintype α] [decidable_eq α]
section
local attribute [semireducible] reflected
meta instance fin_reflect (n : ℕ) : has_reflect (fin n) :=
λ a, `(@fin.mk %%`(n) %%(nat.reflect a.1) (of_as_true %%`(_root_.trivial)))
meta instance fin_fun.has_reflect : has_reflect (fin 5 → fin 5) :=
list.rec_on (quot.unquot (@univ (fin 5) _).1)
(λ f, `(λ y : fin 5, y))
(λ x l ih f, let e := ih f in
if f x = x then e
else let ex := fin_reflect 5 x in
let efx := fin_reflect 5 (f x) in
if e = `(λ y : fin 5, y)
then `(λ y : fin 5, ite.{1} (y = %%ex) (%%efx) y)
else `(λ y : fin 5, ite.{1} (y = %%ex) (%%efx) ((%%e : fin 5 → fin 5) y)))
meta instance : has_reflect (perm (fin 5)) :=
λ f, `(@equiv.mk.{1 1} (fin 5) (fin 5)
%%(fin_fun.has_reflect f.to_fun)
%%(fin_fun.has_reflect f.inv_fun)
(of_as_true %%`(_root_.trivial)) (of_as_true %%`(_root_.trivial)))
meta instance I1 : has_reflect (alternating (fin 5)) :=
λ f, `(@subtype.mk (perm (fin 5)) (is_group_hom.ker (sign : perm (fin 5) → units ℤ))
%%(@reflect (perm (fin 5)) f.1 (equiv.perm.has_reflect f.1))
((is_group_hom.mem_ker sign).2 %%`(@eq.refl (units ℤ) 1)))
meta instance multiset.has_reflect {α : Type} [reflected α] [has_reflect α] :
has_reflect (multiset α) :=
λ s, let l : list α := quot.unquot s in `(@quotient.mk.{1} (list %%`(α)) _ %%`(l))
meta instance I2 (a : alternating (fin 5)) :
has_reflect {b : alternating (fin 5) × alternating (fin 5) // b.2 * a * b.2⁻¹ = b.1} :=
λ b, `(@subtype.mk (alternating (fin 5) × alternating (fin 5))
(λ b, b.2 * %%`(a) * b.2⁻¹ = b.1)
%%(prod.has_reflect _ _ b.1) (of_as_true %%`(_root_.trivial)))
meta instance I3 (a : alternating (fin 5)) (m : reflected a) :
reflected {b : alternating (fin 5) × alternating (fin 5) // b.2 * a * b.2⁻¹ = b.1} :=
`({b : alternating (fin 5) × alternating (fin 5) // b.2 * %%m * b.2⁻¹ = b.1})
meta instance I4 : has_reflect
(Σ a : alternating (fin 5), multiset
{b : alternating (fin 5) × alternating (fin 5) // b.2 * a * b.2⁻¹ = b.1}) :=
λ s, let ra : reflected s.1 := (I1 s.1) in
`(let a : alternating (fin 5) := %%ra in
@sigma.mk (alternating (fin 5))
(λ a, multiset {b : alternating (fin 5) × alternating (fin 5) // b.2 * a * b.2⁻¹ = b.1})
a %%(@multiset.has_reflect _ (I3 s.1 ra) (I2 s.1) s.2))
end
def conjugacy_classes_A5_meta_aux : list (alternating (fin 5)) → multiset
(Σ a : alternating (fin 5), multiset
{b : alternating (fin 5) × alternating (fin 5) // b.2 * a * b.2⁻¹ = b.1})
| [] := 0
| (a :: l) := let m : Σ a : alternating (fin 5), multiset
{b : alternating (fin 5) × alternating (fin 5) // b.2 * a * b.2⁻¹ = b.1} :=
⟨a, quotient.lift_on (@univ (alternating (fin 5)) _).1
(λ l, (l.map
(λ x, show {b : alternating (fin 5) × alternating (fin 5) // b.2 * a * b.2⁻¹ = b.1},
from ⟨(x * a * x⁻¹, x), rfl⟩)).pw_filter (λ x y, x.1.1 ≠ y.1.1)) sorry⟩ in
have wf : (l.filter (λ x, x ∉ m.2.map (prod.fst ∘ subtype.val))).length <
(a :: l : list _).length,
from sorry,
m :: conjugacy_classes_A5_meta_aux (l.filter (λ x, x ∉ m.2.map (prod.fst ∘ subtype.val)))
using_well_founded {rel_tac := λ _ _, `[exact ⟨_, measure_wf list.length⟩],
dec_tac := tactic.assumption}
def conjugacy_classes_A52 : list A5 →
multiset {s : finset A5 // ∀ (x∈s) (y∈s), is_conj x y}
| [] := ∅
| (a::l) :=
let s : {s : finset A5 // ∀ (x∈s) (y∈s), is_conj x y} :=
⟨(@univ A5 _).image (λ x, x * a * x⁻¹),
λ x hx y hy, let ⟨m, _, hm⟩ := mem_image.1 hx in
let ⟨n, _, hn⟩ := mem_image.1 hy in
⟨n * m⁻¹, by simp [hm.symm, mul_assoc, hn.symm]⟩⟩ in
have wf : false, from sorry,
s :: conjugacy_classes_A52 (l.filter (λ x, x ∉ s.1))
using_well_founded {rel_tac := λ _ _, `[exact ⟨_, empty_wf⟩],
dec_tac := tactic.assumption}
-- def conjugacy_classes_A5_meta : multiset (Σ a : alternating (fin 5), multiset
-- {b : alternating (fin 5) × alternating (fin 5) // b.2 * a * b.2⁻¹ = b.1}) :=
-- (quotient.mk ((conjugacy_classes_A5_meta_aux (quot.unquot univ.1)).map
-- (λ a, ⟨a.1, (quotient.mk a.2)⟩)))
#print nat.gcd
open nat
def gcd' : nat → nat → nat
| 0 y := y
| (succ x) y := have false, from sorry,
gcd (y % succ x) (succ x)
using_well_founded {rel_tac := λ _ _, `[exact ⟨_, empty_wf⟩],
dec_tac := tactic.assumption}
example : gcd' 1 2 = 1 := rfl
meta def exact_reflect {α : Sort*} [has_reflect α] (a : α) : tactic unit :=
tactic.exact `(a)
@[irreducible] def conjugacy_classes_A5_aux : multiset (Σ a : alternating (fin 5), multiset
{b : alternating (fin 5) × alternating (fin 5) // b.2 * a * b.2⁻¹ = b.1}) :=
by exact_reflect (conjugacy_classes_A5_meta_aux (quot.unquot univ.1))
example : conjugacy_classes_A5_aux = conjugacy_classes_A5_aux := dec_trivial
def conjugacy_classes_A5_aux2 : multiset (multiset (alternating (fin 5))) :=
conjugacy_classes_A5_aux.map (λ s, s.2.map (λ b, b.1.1))
example : (quotient.lift_on (@univ A5 _).1 conjugacy_classes_A52 sorry).map (finset.card ∘ subtype.val) =
{1,12,12,15,20} := dec_trivial
lemma nodup_conjugacy_classes_A5_aux2_bind : (conjugacy_classes_A5_aux2.bind id).nodup :=
dec_trivial
lemma nodup_conjugacy_classes_A5_aux2 : ∀ s : multiset (alternating (fin 5)),
s ∈ conjugacy_classes_A5_aux2 → s.nodup :=
(multiset.nodup_bind.1 nodup_conjugacy_classes_A5_aux2_bind).1
def conjugacy_classes_A5 : finset (finset (alternating (fin 5))) :=
⟨conjugacy_classes_A5_aux2.pmap finset.mk nodup_conjugacy_classes_A5_aux2, dec_trivial⟩
lemma nodup_conjugacy_classes_A5_bind : (conjugacy_classes_A5.1.bind finset.val).nodup :=
have conjugacy_classes_A5.1.bind finset.val =
conjugacy_classes_A5_aux2.bind id,
from multiset.ext.2 $ λ a,
by rw [conjugacy_classes_A5, @multiset.count_bind A5, @multiset.count_bind A5,
multiset.map_pmap, multiset.pmap_eq_map]; refl,
by rw this; exact nodup_conjugacy_classes_A5_aux2_bind
lemma is_conj_conjugacy_classes_A5 (s : finset A5) (h : s ∈ conjugacy_classes_A5) :
∀ x y ∈ s, is_conj x y :=
assume x y hx hy,
begin
simp only [conjugacy_classes_A5, finset.mem_def, multiset.mem_pmap,
conjugacy_classes_A5_aux2] at h,
rcases h with ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩,
rw [multiset.mem_map] at ht₁,
rcases ht₁ with ⟨u, hu₁, hu₂⟩,
have hx' : x ∈ multiset.map (λ (b : {b : A5 × A5 // b.2 * u.1 * b.2⁻¹ = b.1}), b.1.1) u.2,
{ simpa [ht₂.symm, hu₂] using hx },
have hy' : y ∈ multiset.map (λ (b : {b : A5 × A5 // b.2 * u.1 * b.2⁻¹ = b.1}), b.1.1) u.2,
{ simpa [ht₂.symm, hu₂] using hy },
cases multiset.mem_map.1 hx' with xc hxc,
cases multiset.mem_map.1 hy' with yc hyc,
exact is_conj_trans
(is_conj_symm (show is_conj u.1 x, from hxc.2 ▸ ⟨_, xc.2⟩))
(hyc.2 ▸ ⟨_, yc.2⟩)
end
variables {G : Type u} [group G] [decidable_eq G]
lemma normal_subgroup_eq_bind_conjugacy_classes (s : finset (finset G)) (h₁ : ∀ x, ∃ t ∈ s, x ∈ t)
(h₂ : ∀ t ∈ s, ∀ x y ∈ t, is_conj x y) (I : finset G) [nI : normal_subgroup (↑I : set G)] :
∃ u ⊆ s, I = u.bind id :=
⟨(s.powerset.filter (λ u : finset (finset G), u.bind id ⊆ I)).bind id,
(λ x, by simp only [finset.subset_iff, mem_bind, mem_filter, exists_imp_distrib, mem_powerset,
and_imp, id.def] {contextual := tt}; tauto),
le_antisymm
(λ x hxI, let ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := h₁ x in
mem_bind.2 ⟨t, mem_bind.2 ⟨(s.powerset.filter (λ u : finset (finset G), u.bind id ⊆ I)).bind id,
mem_filter.2 ⟨mem_powerset.2
(λ u hu, let ⟨v, hv₁, hv₂⟩ := mem_bind.1 hu in
mem_powerset.1 (mem_filter.1 hv₁).1 hv₂),
λ y hy, let ⟨u, hu₁, hu₂⟩ := mem_bind.1 hy in
let ⟨v, hv₁, hv₂⟩ := mem_bind.1 hu₁ in
(mem_filter.1 hv₁).2 (mem_bind.2 ⟨u, hv₂, hu₂⟩)⟩,
mem_bind.2 ⟨{t}, mem_filter.2 ⟨by simp [ht₁, finset.subset_iff],
λ y hy, let ⟨u, hu₁, hu₂⟩ := mem_bind.1 hy in
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := h₂ t ht₁ x y ht₂ (by simp * at *) in
hz ▸ @normal_subgroup.normal G _ I.to_set nI _ hxI _⟩,
by simp⟩⟩,
ht₂⟩)
(λ x, by simp only [finset.subset_iff, mem_bind, exists_imp_distrib, mem_filter, mem_powerset]; tauto)⟩
lemma simple_of_card_conjugacy_classes [fintype G] (s : finset (finset G))
(h₁ : ∀ x, ∃ t ∈ s, x ∈ t) (h₂ : ∀ t ∈ s, ∀ x y ∈ t, is_conj x y)
(hs : (s.1.bind finset.val).nodup)
(h₃ : ∀ t ≤ s.1.map finset.card, 1 ∈ t → t.sum ∣ fintype.card G → t.sum = 1 ∨ t.sum = fintype.card G) :
simple_group G :=
by haveI := classical.dec; exact
⟨λ H iH,
let I := (set.to_finset H) in
have Ii : normal_subgroup (↑I : set G), by simpa using iH,
let ⟨u, hu₁, hu₂⟩ :=
@normal_subgroup_eq_bind_conjugacy_classes G _ _ s h₁ h₂ I Ii in
have hInd : ∀ (x : finset G), x ∈ u → ∀ (y : finset G), y ∈ u → x ≠ y → id x ∩ id y = ∅,
from λ x hxu y hyu hxy,
begin
rw multiset.nodup_bind at hs,
rw [← finset.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty, finset.disjoint_left],
exact multiset.forall_of_pairwise
(λ (a b : finset G) (h : multiset.disjoint a.1 b.1),
multiset.disjoint.symm h) hs.2 x (hu₁ hxu) y (hu₁ hyu) hxy
end,
have hci : card I = u.sum finset.card,
by rw [hu₂, card_bind hInd]; refl,
have hu1 : (1 : G) ∈ u.bind id, by exactI hu₂ ▸ is_submonoid.one_mem (↑I : set G),
let ⟨v, hv₁, hv₂⟩ := mem_bind.1 hu1 in
have hv : v = finset.singleton (1 : G),
from finset.ext.2 $ λ a, ⟨λ hav, mem_singleton.2 $
is_conj_one_right.1 (h₂ v (hu₁ hv₁) _ _ hv₂ hav),
by simp [show (1 : G) ∈ v, from hv₂] {contextual := tt}⟩,
have hci' : card I = 1 ∨ card I = fintype.card G,
begin
rw [hci],
exact h₃ _ (multiset.map_le_map (show u.1 ≤ s.1,
from (multiset.le_iff_subset u.2).2 hu₁))
(multiset.mem_map.2 ⟨finset.singleton 1, hv ▸ hv₁, rfl⟩)
(calc u.sum finset.card = card I : hci.symm
... = fintype.card (↑I : set G) : (set.card_fintype_of_finset' I (by simp)).symm
... ∣ fintype.card G : by exactI card_subgroup_dvd_card _)
end,
hci'.elim
(λ hci', or.inl (set.ext (λ x,
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := finset.card_eq_one.1 hci' in
by resetI;
simp only [I, finset.ext, set.mem_to_finset, finset.mem_singleton] at hy;
simp [is_subgroup.mem_trivial, hy, (hy 1).1 (is_submonoid.one_mem H)])))
(λ hci', or.inr $
suffices I = finset.univ,
by simpa [I, set.ext_iff, finset.ext] using this,
finset.eq_of_subset_of_card_le (λ _, by simp) (by rw hci'; refl))⟩
lemma card_A5 : fintype.card A5 = 60 :=
(nat.mul_right_inj (show 2 > 0, from dec_trivial)).1 $
have 2 ≤ fintype.card (fin 5), from dec_trivial,
by rw [card_alternating _ this]; simp; refl
lemma conjugacy_classes_A5_bind_eq_univ :
conjugacy_classes_A5.bind (λ t, t) = univ :=
eq_of_subset_of_card_le (λ _, by simp)
(calc card univ = 60 : card_A5
... ≤ (conjugacy_classes_A5.1.bind finset.val).card : dec_trivial
... = (conjugacy_classes_A5.bind id).card :
begin
rw [finset.card_bind, multiset.card_bind], refl,
{ exact multiset.forall_of_pairwise (λ a b, by simp [finset.inter_comm])
(by simp only [finset.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.symm, finset.disjoint_left];
exact (multiset.nodup_bind.1 nodup_conjugacy_classes_A5_bind).2) }
end)
lemma A5_simple : simple_group A5 :=
simple_of_card_conjugacy_classes conjugacy_classes_A5
(λ x, mem_bind.1 $ by rw [conjugacy_classes_A5_bind_eq_univ]; simp)
is_conj_conjugacy_classes_A5
nodup_conjugacy_classes_A5_bind
(by simp only [multiset.mem_powerset.symm, card_A5];
exact dec_trivial)
|
8c8a39f73a692157187e774bad12829056ba6b37 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/algebra/continued_fractions/computation/default.lean | c9d65d7eeb53f1a7fc69a0bc69844f82421e7a1a | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 391 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kevin Kappelmann. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Kappelmann
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.algebra.continued_fractions.computation.basic
import Mathlib.algebra.continued_fractions.computation.translations
import Mathlib.PostPort
namespace Mathlib
|
877afe84712e14abe9df6123a7d38f58ba7d3c51 | 8d65764a9e5f0923a67fc435eb1a5a1d02fd80e3 | /src/topology/algebra/uniform_ring.lean | 8e97a613b9b01eb07ba68349d8b56407e932a866 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | troyjlee/mathlib | e18d4b8026e32062ab9e89bc3b003a5d1cfec3f5 | 45e7eb8447555247246e3fe91c87066506c14875 | refs/heads/master | 1,689,248,035,046 | 1,629,470,528,000 | 1,629,470,528,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,648 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl
Theory of topological rings with uniform structure.
-/
import topology.algebra.group_completion
import topology.algebra.ring
open classical set filter topological_space add_comm_group
open_locale classical
noncomputable theory
namespace uniform_space.completion
open dense_inducing uniform_space function
variables (α : Type*) [ring α] [uniform_space α]
instance : has_one (completion α) := ⟨(1:α)⟩
instance : has_mul (completion α) :=
⟨curry $ (dense_inducing_coe.prod dense_inducing_coe).extend (coe ∘ uncurry (*))⟩
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_one : ((1 : α) : completion α) = 1 := rfl
variables {α} [topological_ring α]
@[norm_cast]
lemma coe_mul (a b : α) : ((a * b : α) : completion α) = a * b :=
((dense_inducing_coe.prod dense_inducing_coe).extend_eq
((continuous_coe α).comp (@continuous_mul α _ _ _)) (a, b)).symm
variables [uniform_add_group α]
lemma continuous_mul : continuous (λ p : completion α × completion α, p.1 * p.2) :=
begin
let m := (add_monoid_hom.mul : α →+ α →+ α).compr₂ to_compl,
have : continuous (λ p : α × α, m p.1 p.2),
from (continuous_coe α).comp continuous_mul,
have di : dense_inducing (to_compl : α → completion α),
from dense_inducing_coe,
convert di.extend_Z_bilin di this,
ext ⟨x, y⟩,
refl
end
lemma continuous.mul {β : Type*} [topological_space β] {f g : β → completion α}
(hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g) : continuous (λb, f b * g b) :=
continuous_mul.comp (hf.prod_mk hg : _)
instance : ring (completion α) :=
{ one_mul := assume a, completion.induction_on a
(is_closed_eq (continuous.mul continuous_const continuous_id) continuous_id)
(assume a, by rw [← coe_one, ← coe_mul, one_mul]),
mul_one := assume a, completion.induction_on a
(is_closed_eq (continuous.mul continuous_id continuous_const) continuous_id)
(assume a, by rw [← coe_one, ← coe_mul, mul_one]),
mul_assoc := assume a b c, completion.induction_on₃ a b c
(is_closed_eq
(continuous.mul (continuous.mul continuous_fst (continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd))
(continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))
(continuous.mul continuous_fst
(continuous.mul (continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd) (continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))))
(assume a b c, by rw [← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, mul_assoc]),
left_distrib := assume a b c, completion.induction_on₃ a b c
(is_closed_eq
(continuous.mul continuous_fst (continuous.add
(continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd)
(continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd)))
(continuous.add
(continuous.mul continuous_fst (continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd))
(continuous.mul continuous_fst (continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))))
(assume a b c, by rw [← coe_add, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ←coe_add, mul_add]),
right_distrib := assume a b c, completion.induction_on₃ a b c
(is_closed_eq
(continuous.mul (continuous.add continuous_fst
(continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd)) (continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))
(continuous.add
(continuous.mul continuous_fst (continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))
(continuous.mul (continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd) (continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))))
(assume a b c, by rw [← coe_add, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ←coe_add, add_mul]),
..completion.add_comm_group, ..completion.has_mul α, ..completion.has_one α }
/-- The map from a uniform ring to its completion, as a ring homomorphism. -/
def coe_ring_hom : α →+* completion α :=
⟨coe, coe_one α, assume a b, coe_mul a b, coe_zero, assume a b, coe_add a b⟩
lemma continuous_coe_ring_hom : continuous (coe_ring_hom : α → completion α) :=
continuous_coe α
universes u
variables {β : Type u} [uniform_space β] [ring β] [uniform_add_group β] [topological_ring β]
(f : α →+* β) (hf : continuous f)
/-- The completion extension as a ring morphism. -/
def extension_hom [complete_space β] [separated_space β] :
completion α →+* β :=
have hf' : continuous (f : α →+ β), from hf, -- helping the elaborator
have hf : uniform_continuous f, from uniform_continuous_of_continuous hf',
{ to_fun := completion.extension f,
map_zero' := by rw [← coe_zero, extension_coe hf, f.map_zero],
map_add' := assume a b, completion.induction_on₂ a b
(is_closed_eq
(continuous_extension.comp continuous_add)
((continuous_extension.comp continuous_fst).add
(continuous_extension.comp continuous_snd)))
(assume a b,
by rw [← coe_add, extension_coe hf, extension_coe hf, extension_coe hf,
f.map_add]),
map_one' := by rw [← coe_one, extension_coe hf, f.map_one],
map_mul' := assume a b, completion.induction_on₂ a b
(is_closed_eq
(continuous_extension.comp continuous_mul)
((continuous_extension.comp continuous_fst).mul (continuous_extension.comp continuous_snd)))
(assume a b,
by rw [← coe_mul, extension_coe hf, extension_coe hf, extension_coe hf, f.map_mul]) }
instance top_ring_compl : topological_ring (completion α) :=
{ continuous_add := continuous_add,
continuous_mul := continuous_mul,
continuous_neg := continuous_neg }
/-- The completion map as a ring morphism. -/
def map_ring_hom (hf : continuous f) : completion α →+* completion β :=
extension_hom (coe_ring_hom.comp f) (continuous_coe_ring_hom.comp hf)
variables (R : Type*) [comm_ring R] [uniform_space R] [uniform_add_group R] [topological_ring R]
instance : comm_ring (completion R) :=
{ mul_comm := assume a b, completion.induction_on₂ a b
(is_closed_eq (continuous_fst.mul continuous_snd)
(continuous_snd.mul continuous_fst))
(assume a b, by rw [← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, mul_comm]),
..completion.ring }
end uniform_space.completion
namespace uniform_space
variables {α : Type*}
lemma ring_sep_rel (α) [comm_ring α] [uniform_space α] [uniform_add_group α] [topological_ring α] :
separation_setoid α = submodule.quotient_rel (ideal.closure ⊥) :=
setoid.ext $ assume x y, group_separation_rel x y
lemma ring_sep_quot
(α) [r : comm_ring α] [uniform_space α] [uniform_add_group α] [topological_ring α] :
quotient (separation_setoid α) = (⊥ : ideal α).closure.quotient :=
by rw [@ring_sep_rel α r]; refl
/-- Given a topological ring `α` equipped with a uniform structure that makes subtraction uniformly
continuous, get an equivalence between the separated quotient of `α` and the quotient ring
corresponding to the closure of zero. -/
def sep_quot_equiv_ring_quot (α)
[r : comm_ring α] [uniform_space α] [uniform_add_group α] [topological_ring α] :
quotient (separation_setoid α) ≃ (⊥ : ideal α).closure.quotient :=
quotient.congr_right $ assume x y, group_separation_rel x y
/- TODO: use a form of transport a.k.a. lift definition a.k.a. transfer -/
instance comm_ring [comm_ring α] [uniform_space α] [uniform_add_group α] [topological_ring α] :
comm_ring (quotient (separation_setoid α)) :=
by rw ring_sep_quot α; apply_instance
instance topological_ring
[comm_ring α] [uniform_space α] [uniform_add_group α] [topological_ring α] :
topological_ring (quotient (separation_setoid α)) :=
begin
convert topological_ring_quotient (⊥ : ideal α).closure; try {apply ring_sep_rel},
simp [uniform_space.comm_ring]
end
end uniform_space
|
e2ed24631b73c4c286fceaf735342effb2668c79 | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/analysis/special_functions/complex/log_deriv.lean | 75d63fafccf352e4c54c61b5ae1c6b7c4e634b8e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,351 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import analysis.special_functions.complex.log
import analysis.special_functions.exp_deriv
/-!
# Differentiability of the complex `log` function
-/
noncomputable theory
namespace complex
open set filter
open_locale real topological_space
/-- `complex.exp` as a `local_homeomorph` with `source = {z | -π < im z < π}` and
`target = {z | 0 < re z} ∪ {z | im z ≠ 0}`. This definition is used to prove that `complex.log`
is complex differentiable at all points but the negative real semi-axis. -/
def exp_local_homeomorph : local_homeomorph ℂ ℂ :=
local_homeomorph.of_continuous_open
{ to_fun := exp,
inv_fun := log,
source := {z : ℂ | z.im ∈ Ioo (- π) π},
target := {z : ℂ | 0 < z.re} ∪ {z : ℂ | z.im ≠ 0},
map_source' :=
begin
rintro ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨h₁ : -π < y, h₂ : y < π⟩,
refine (not_or_of_imp $ λ hz, _).symm,
obtain rfl : y = 0,
{ rw exp_im at hz,
simpa [(real.exp_pos _).ne', real.sin_eq_zero_iff_of_lt_of_lt h₁ h₂] using hz },
rw [mem_set_of_eq, ← of_real_def, exp_of_real_re],
exact real.exp_pos x
end,
map_target' := λ z h,
suffices 0 ≤ z.re ∨ z.im ≠ 0,
by simpa [log_im, neg_pi_lt_arg, (arg_le_pi _).lt_iff_ne, arg_eq_pi_iff, not_and_distrib],
h.imp (λ h, le_of_lt h) id,
left_inv' := λ x hx, log_exp hx.1 (le_of_lt hx.2),
right_inv' := λ x hx, exp_log $ by { rintro rfl, simpa [lt_irrefl] using hx } }
continuous_exp.continuous_on is_open_map_exp (is_open_Ioo.preimage continuous_im)
lemma has_strict_deriv_at_log {x : ℂ} (h : 0 < x.re ∨ x.im ≠ 0) :
has_strict_deriv_at log x⁻¹ x :=
have h0 : x ≠ 0, by { rintro rfl, simpa [lt_irrefl] using h },
exp_local_homeomorph.has_strict_deriv_at_symm h h0 $
by simpa [exp_log h0] using has_strict_deriv_at_exp (log x)
lemma has_strict_fderiv_at_log_real {x : ℂ} (h : 0 < x.re ∨ x.im ≠ 0) :
has_strict_fderiv_at log (x⁻¹ • (1 : ℂ →L[ℝ] ℂ)) x :=
(has_strict_deriv_at_log h).complex_to_real_fderiv
lemma cont_diff_at_log {x : ℂ} (h : 0 < x.re ∨ x.im ≠ 0) {n : with_top ℕ} :
cont_diff_at ℂ n log x :=
exp_local_homeomorph.cont_diff_at_symm_deriv (exp_ne_zero $ log x) h
(has_deriv_at_exp _) cont_diff_exp.cont_diff_at
end complex
section log_deriv
open complex filter
open_locale topological_space
variables {α : Type*} [topological_space α] {E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space ℂ E]
lemma has_strict_fderiv_at.clog {f : E → ℂ} {f' : E →L[ℂ] ℂ} {x : E}
(h₁ : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x) (h₂ : 0 < (f x).re ∨ (f x).im ≠ 0) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ t, log (f t)) ((f x)⁻¹ • f') x :=
(has_strict_deriv_at_log h₂).comp_has_strict_fderiv_at x h₁
lemma has_strict_deriv_at.clog {f : ℂ → ℂ} {f' x : ℂ} (h₁ : has_strict_deriv_at f f' x)
(h₂ : 0 < (f x).re ∨ (f x).im ≠ 0) :
has_strict_deriv_at (λ t, log (f t)) (f' / f x) x :=
by { rw div_eq_inv_mul, exact (has_strict_deriv_at_log h₂).comp x h₁ }
lemma has_strict_deriv_at.clog_real {f : ℝ → ℂ} {x : ℝ} {f' : ℂ} (h₁ : has_strict_deriv_at f f' x)
(h₂ : 0 < (f x).re ∨ (f x).im ≠ 0) :
has_strict_deriv_at (λ t, log (f t)) (f' / f x) x :=
by simpa only [div_eq_inv_mul]
using (has_strict_fderiv_at_log_real h₂).comp_has_strict_deriv_at x h₁
lemma has_fderiv_at.clog {f : E → ℂ} {f' : E →L[ℂ] ℂ} {x : E}
(h₁ : has_fderiv_at f f' x) (h₂ : 0 < (f x).re ∨ (f x).im ≠ 0) :
has_fderiv_at (λ t, log (f t)) ((f x)⁻¹ • f') x :=
(has_strict_deriv_at_log h₂).has_deriv_at.comp_has_fderiv_at x h₁
lemma has_deriv_at.clog {f : ℂ → ℂ} {f' x : ℂ} (h₁ : has_deriv_at f f' x)
(h₂ : 0 < (f x).re ∨ (f x).im ≠ 0) :
has_deriv_at (λ t, log (f t)) (f' / f x) x :=
by { rw div_eq_inv_mul, exact (has_strict_deriv_at_log h₂).has_deriv_at.comp x h₁ }
lemma has_deriv_at.clog_real {f : ℝ → ℂ} {x : ℝ} {f' : ℂ} (h₁ : has_deriv_at f f' x)
(h₂ : 0 < (f x).re ∨ (f x).im ≠ 0) :
has_deriv_at (λ t, log (f t)) (f' / f x) x :=
by simpa only [div_eq_inv_mul]
using (has_strict_fderiv_at_log_real h₂).has_fderiv_at.comp_has_deriv_at x h₁
lemma differentiable_at.clog {f : E → ℂ} {x : E} (h₁ : differentiable_at ℂ f x)
(h₂ : 0 < (f x).re ∨ (f x).im ≠ 0) :
differentiable_at ℂ (λ t, log (f t)) x :=
(h₁.has_fderiv_at.clog h₂).differentiable_at
lemma has_fderiv_within_at.clog {f : E → ℂ} {f' : E →L[ℂ] ℂ} {s : set E} {x : E}
(h₁ : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) (h₂ : 0 < (f x).re ∨ (f x).im ≠ 0) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ t, log (f t)) ((f x)⁻¹ • f') s x :=
(has_strict_deriv_at_log h₂).has_deriv_at.comp_has_fderiv_within_at x h₁
lemma has_deriv_within_at.clog {f : ℂ → ℂ} {f' x : ℂ} {s : set ℂ}
(h₁ : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (h₂ : 0 < (f x).re ∨ (f x).im ≠ 0) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ t, log (f t)) (f' / f x) s x :=
by { rw div_eq_inv_mul,
exact (has_strict_deriv_at_log h₂).has_deriv_at.comp_has_deriv_within_at x h₁ }
lemma has_deriv_within_at.clog_real {f : ℝ → ℂ} {s : set ℝ} {x : ℝ} {f' : ℂ}
(h₁ : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (h₂ : 0 < (f x).re ∨ (f x).im ≠ 0) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ t, log (f t)) (f' / f x) s x :=
by simpa only [div_eq_inv_mul]
using (has_strict_fderiv_at_log_real h₂).has_fderiv_at.comp_has_deriv_within_at x h₁
lemma differentiable_within_at.clog {f : E → ℂ} {s : set E} {x : E}
(h₁ : differentiable_within_at ℂ f s x) (h₂ : 0 < (f x).re ∨ (f x).im ≠ 0) :
differentiable_within_at ℂ (λ t, log (f t)) s x :=
(h₁.has_fderiv_within_at.clog h₂).differentiable_within_at
lemma differentiable_on.clog {f : E → ℂ} {s : set E}
(h₁ : differentiable_on ℂ f s) (h₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 < (f x).re ∨ (f x).im ≠ 0) :
differentiable_on ℂ (λ t, log (f t)) s :=
λ x hx, (h₁ x hx).clog (h₂ x hx)
lemma differentiable.clog {f : E → ℂ} (h₁ : differentiable ℂ f)
(h₂ : ∀ x, 0 < (f x).re ∨ (f x).im ≠ 0) :
differentiable ℂ (λ t, log (f t)) :=
λ x, (h₁ x).clog (h₂ x)
end log_deriv
|
ba4874c59df08ef19f932e0b1daceaea2190a67c | 63abd62053d479eae5abf4951554e1064a4c45b4 | /src/data/polynomial/degree/basic.lean | ab8da6a509b430bbf375b04cfa4908d8c1934271 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Lix0120/mathlib | 0020745240315ed0e517cbf32e738d8f9811dd80 | e14c37827456fc6707f31b4d1d16f1f3a3205e91 | refs/heads/master | 1,673,102,855,024 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 308,930,245 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,604,164,710,000 | 1,604,163,547,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 34,939 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Scott Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import data.polynomial.coeff
import data.nat.with_bot
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
The definitions include
`degree`, `monic`, `leading_coeff`
Results include
- `degree_mul` : The degree of the product is the sum of degrees
- `leading_coeff_add_of_degree_eq` and `leading_coeff_add_of_degree_lt` :
The leading_coefficient of a sum is determined by the leading coefficients and degrees
-/
noncomputable theory
local attribute [instance, priority 100] classical.prop_decidable
open finsupp finset
open_locale big_operators
namespace polynomial
universes u v
variables {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b : R} {n m : ℕ}
section semiring
variables [semiring R] {p q r : polynomial R}
/-- `degree p` is the degree of the polynomial `p`, i.e. the largest `X`-exponent in `p`.
`degree p = some n` when `p ≠ 0` and `n` is the highest power of `X` that appears in `p`, otherwise
`degree 0 = ⊥`. -/
def degree (p : polynomial R) : with_bot ℕ := p.support.sup some
lemma degree_lt_wf : well_founded (λp q : polynomial R, degree p < degree q) :=
inv_image.wf degree (with_bot.well_founded_lt nat.lt_wf)
instance : has_well_founded (polynomial R) := ⟨_, degree_lt_wf⟩
/-- `nat_degree p` forces `degree p` to ℕ, by defining nat_degree 0 = 0. -/
def nat_degree (p : polynomial R) : ℕ := (degree p).get_or_else 0
/-- `leading_coeff p` gives the coefficient of the highest power of `X` in `p`-/
def leading_coeff (p : polynomial R) : R := coeff p (nat_degree p)
/-- a polynomial is `monic` if its leading coefficient is 1 -/
def monic (p : polynomial R) := leading_coeff p = (1 : R)
@[nontriviality] lemma monic_of_subsingleton [subsingleton R] (p : polynomial R) : monic p :=
subsingleton.elim _ _
lemma monic.def : monic p ↔ leading_coeff p = 1 := iff.rfl
instance monic.decidable [decidable_eq R] : decidable (monic p) :=
by unfold monic; apply_instance
@[simp] lemma monic.leading_coeff {p : polynomial R} (hp : p.monic) :
leading_coeff p = 1 := hp
@[simp] lemma degree_zero : degree (0 : polynomial R) = ⊥ := rfl
@[simp] lemma nat_degree_zero : nat_degree (0 : polynomial R) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma coeff_nat_degree : coeff p (nat_degree p) = leading_coeff p := rfl
lemma degree_eq_bot : degree p = ⊥ ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨λ h, by rw [degree, ← max_eq_sup_with_bot] at h;
exact support_eq_empty.1 (max_eq_none.1 h),
λ h, h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
lemma degree_eq_nat_degree (hp : p ≠ 0) : degree p = (nat_degree p : with_bot ℕ) :=
let ⟨n, hn⟩ :=
not_forall.1 (mt option.eq_none_iff_forall_not_mem.2 (mt degree_eq_bot.1 hp)) in
have hn : degree p = some n := not_not.1 hn,
by rw [nat_degree, hn]; refl
lemma degree_eq_iff_nat_degree_eq {p : polynomial R} {n : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
p.degree = n ↔ p.nat_degree = n :=
by rw [degree_eq_nat_degree hp, with_bot.coe_eq_coe]
lemma degree_eq_iff_nat_degree_eq_of_pos {p : polynomial R} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
p.degree = n ↔ p.nat_degree = n :=
begin
split,
{ intro H, rwa ← degree_eq_iff_nat_degree_eq, rintro rfl,
rw degree_zero at H, exact option.no_confusion H },
{ intro H, rwa degree_eq_iff_nat_degree_eq, rintro rfl,
rw nat_degree_zero at H, rw H at hn, exact lt_irrefl _ hn }
end
lemma nat_degree_eq_of_degree_eq_some {p : polynomial R} {n : ℕ}
(h : degree p = n) : nat_degree p = n :=
have hp0 : p ≠ 0, from λ hp0, by rw hp0 at h; exact option.no_confusion h,
option.some_inj.1 $ show (nat_degree p : with_bot ℕ) = n,
by rwa [← degree_eq_nat_degree hp0]
@[simp] lemma degree_le_nat_degree : degree p ≤ nat_degree p :=
with_bot.gi_get_or_else_bot.gc.le_u_l _
lemma nat_degree_eq_of_degree_eq [semiring S] {q : polynomial S} (h : degree p = degree q) :
nat_degree p = nat_degree q :=
by unfold nat_degree; rw h
lemma le_degree_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : (n : with_bot ℕ) ≤ degree p :=
show @has_le.le (with_bot ℕ) _ (some n : with_bot ℕ) (p.support.sup some : with_bot ℕ),
from finset.le_sup (finsupp.mem_support_iff.2 h)
lemma le_nat_degree_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : n ≤ nat_degree p :=
begin
rw [← with_bot.coe_le_coe, ← degree_eq_nat_degree],
exact le_degree_of_ne_zero h,
{ assume h, subst h, exact h rfl }
end
lemma le_nat_degree_of_mem_supp (a : ℕ) :
a ∈ p.support → a ≤ nat_degree p:=
le_nat_degree_of_ne_zero ∘ mem_support_iff_coeff_ne_zero.mp
lemma supp_subset_range (h : nat_degree p < m) : p.support ⊆ finset.range m :=
λ n hn, mem_range.2 $ (le_nat_degree_of_mem_supp _ hn).trans_lt h
lemma supp_subset_range_nat_degree_succ : p.support ⊆ finset.range (nat_degree p + 1) :=
supp_subset_range (nat.lt_succ_self _)
lemma degree_le_degree (h : coeff q (nat_degree p) ≠ 0) : degree p ≤ degree q :=
begin
by_cases hp : p = 0,
{ rw hp, exact bot_le },
{ rw degree_eq_nat_degree hp, exact le_degree_of_ne_zero h }
end
lemma degree_ne_of_nat_degree_ne {n : ℕ} :
p.nat_degree ≠ n → degree p ≠ n :=
mt $ λ h, by rw [nat_degree, h, option.get_or_else_coe]
theorem nat_degree_le_iff_degree_le {n : ℕ} : nat_degree p ≤ n ↔ degree p ≤ n :=
with_bot.get_or_else_bot_le_iff
alias polynomial.nat_degree_le_iff_degree_le ↔ . .
lemma nat_degree_le_nat_degree (hpq : p.degree ≤ q.degree) : p.nat_degree ≤ q.nat_degree :=
with_bot.gi_get_or_else_bot.gc.monotone_l hpq
@[simp] lemma degree_C (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a) = (0 : with_bot ℕ) :=
show sup (ite (a = 0) ∅ {0}) some = 0, by rw if_neg ha; refl
lemma degree_C_le : degree (C a) ≤ (0 : with_bot ℕ) :=
by by_cases h : a = 0; [rw [h, C_0], rw [degree_C h]]; [exact bot_le, exact le_refl _]
lemma degree_one_le : degree (1 : polynomial R) ≤ (0 : with_bot ℕ) :=
by rw [← C_1]; exact degree_C_le
@[simp] lemma nat_degree_C (a : R) : nat_degree (C a) = 0 :=
begin
by_cases ha : a = 0,
{ have : C a = 0, { rw [ha, C_0] },
rw [nat_degree, degree_eq_bot.2 this],
refl },
{ rw [nat_degree, degree_C ha], refl }
end
@[simp] lemma nat_degree_one : nat_degree (1 : polynomial R) = 0 := nat_degree_C 1
@[simp] lemma nat_degree_nat_cast (n : ℕ) : nat_degree (n : polynomial R) = 0 :=
by simp only [←C_eq_nat_cast, nat_degree_C]
@[simp] lemma degree_monomial (n : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (monomial n a) = n :=
by rw [degree, support_monomial _ _ ha]; refl
@[simp] lemma degree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a * X ^ n) = n :=
by rw [← single_eq_C_mul_X, degree_monomial n ha]
lemma degree_monomial_le (n : ℕ) (a : R) : degree (monomial n a) ≤ n :=
if h : a = 0 then by rw [h, (monomial n).map_zero]; exact bot_le else le_of_eq (degree_monomial n h)
lemma degree_C_mul_X_pow_le (n : ℕ) (a : R) : degree (C a * X ^ n) ≤ n :=
by { rw C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, apply degree_monomial_le }
@[simp] lemma nat_degree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (a : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) : nat_degree (C a * X ^ n) = n :=
nat_degree_eq_of_degree_eq_some (degree_C_mul_X_pow n ha)
@[simp] lemma nat_degree_monomial (i : ℕ) (r : R) (hr : r ≠ 0) :
nat_degree (monomial i r) = i :=
by rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, nat_degree_C_mul_X_pow i r hr]
lemma coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt (h : degree p < n) : coeff p n = 0 :=
not_not.1 (mt le_degree_of_ne_zero (not_le_of_gt h))
lemma coeff_eq_zero_of_nat_degree_lt {p : polynomial R} {n : ℕ} (h : p.nat_degree < n) :
p.coeff n = 0 :=
begin
apply coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt,
by_cases hp : p = 0,
{ subst hp, exact with_bot.bot_lt_coe n },
{ rwa [degree_eq_nat_degree hp, with_bot.coe_lt_coe] }
end
@[simp] lemma coeff_nat_degree_succ_eq_zero {p : polynomial R} : p.coeff (p.nat_degree + 1) = 0 :=
coeff_eq_zero_of_nat_degree_lt (lt_add_one _)
-- We need the explicit `decidable` argument here because an exotic one shows up in a moment!
lemma ite_le_nat_degree_coeff (p : polynomial R) (n : ℕ) (I : decidable (n < 1 + nat_degree p)) :
@ite (n < 1 + nat_degree p) I _ (coeff p n) 0 = coeff p n :=
begin
split_ifs,
{ refl },
{ exact (coeff_eq_zero_of_nat_degree_lt (not_le.1 (λ w, h (nat.lt_one_add_iff.2 w)))).symm, }
end
lemma as_sum_support (p : polynomial R) :
p = ∑ i in p.support, monomial i (p.coeff i) :=
p.sum_single.symm
lemma as_sum_support_C_mul_X_pow (p : polynomial R) :
p = ∑ i in p.support, C (p.coeff i) * X^i :=
trans p.as_sum_support $ by simp only [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
/--
We can reexpress a sum over `p.support` as a sum over `range n`,
for any `n` satisfying `p.nat_degree < n`.
-/
lemma sum_over_range' [add_comm_monoid S] (p : polynomial R) {f : ℕ → R → S} (h : ∀ n, f n 0 = 0)
(n : ℕ) (w : p.nat_degree < n) :
p.sum f = ∑ (a : ℕ) in range n, f a (coeff p a) :=
finsupp.sum_of_support_subset _ (supp_subset_range w) _ $ λ n hn, h n
/--
We can reexpress a sum over `p.support` as a sum over `range (p.nat_degree + 1)`.
-/
lemma sum_over_range [add_comm_monoid S] (p : polynomial R) {f : ℕ → R → S} (h : ∀ n, f n 0 = 0) :
p.sum f = ∑ (a : ℕ) in range (p.nat_degree + 1), f a (coeff p a) :=
sum_over_range' p h (p.nat_degree + 1) (lt_add_one _)
lemma as_sum_range' (p : polynomial R) (n : ℕ) (w : p.nat_degree < n) :
p = ∑ i in range n, monomial i (coeff p i) :=
p.sum_single.symm.trans $ p.sum_over_range' (λ n, single_zero) _ w
lemma as_sum_range (p : polynomial R) :
p = ∑ i in range (p.nat_degree + 1), monomial i (coeff p i) :=
p.sum_single.symm.trans $ p.sum_over_range $ λ n, single_zero
lemma as_sum_range_C_mul_X_pow (p : polynomial R) :
p = ∑ i in range (p.nat_degree + 1), C (coeff p i) * X ^ i :=
p.as_sum_range.trans $ by simp only [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
lemma coeff_ne_zero_of_eq_degree (hn : degree p = n) :
coeff p n ≠ 0 :=
λ h, mem_support_iff.mp (mem_of_max hn) h
lemma eq_X_add_C_of_degree_le_one (h : degree p ≤ 1) :
p = C (p.coeff 1) * X + C (p.coeff 0) :=
ext (λ n, nat.cases_on n (by simp)
(λ n, nat.cases_on n (by simp [coeff_C])
(λ m, have degree p < m.succ.succ, from lt_of_le_of_lt h dec_trivial,
by simp [coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt this, coeff_C, nat.succ_ne_zero, coeff_X,
nat.succ_inj', @eq_comm ℕ 0])))
lemma eq_X_add_C_of_degree_eq_one (h : degree p = 1) :
p = C (p.leading_coeff) * X + C (p.coeff 0) :=
(eq_X_add_C_of_degree_le_one (show degree p ≤ 1, from h ▸ le_refl _)).trans
(by simp [leading_coeff, nat_degree_eq_of_degree_eq_some h])
lemma eq_X_add_C_of_nat_degree_le_one (h : nat_degree p ≤ 1) :
p = C (p.coeff 1) * X + C (p.coeff 0) :=
eq_X_add_C_of_degree_le_one $ degree_le_of_nat_degree_le h
lemma exists_eq_X_add_C_of_nat_degree_le_one (h : nat_degree p ≤ 1) :
∃ a b, p = C a * X + C b :=
⟨p.coeff 1, p.coeff 0, eq_X_add_C_of_nat_degree_le_one h⟩
theorem degree_X_pow_le (n : ℕ) : degree (X^n : polynomial R) ≤ n :=
by simpa only [C_1, one_mul] using degree_C_mul_X_pow_le n (1:R)
theorem degree_X_le : degree (X : polynomial R) ≤ 1 :=
degree_monomial_le _ _
lemma nat_degree_X_le : (X : polynomial R).nat_degree ≤ 1 :=
nat_degree_le_of_degree_le degree_X_le
lemma support_C_mul_X_pow (c : R) (n : ℕ) : (C c * X ^ n).support ⊆ singleton n :=
begin
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial],
exact support_single_subset
end
lemma mem_support_C_mul_X_pow {n a : ℕ} {c : R} (h : a ∈ (C c * X ^ n).support) : a = n :=
mem_singleton.1 $ support_C_mul_X_pow _ _ h
lemma card_support_C_mul_X_pow_le_one {c : R} {n : ℕ} : (C c * X ^ n).support.card ≤ 1 :=
begin
rw ← card_singleton n,
apply card_le_of_subset (support_C_mul_X_pow c n),
end
lemma card_supp_le_succ_nat_degree (p : polynomial R) : p.support.card ≤ p.nat_degree + 1 :=
begin
rw ← finset.card_range (p.nat_degree + 1),
exact finset.card_le_of_subset supp_subset_range_nat_degree_succ,
end
lemma le_degree_of_mem_supp (a : ℕ) :
a ∈ p.support → ↑a ≤ degree p :=
le_degree_of_ne_zero ∘ mem_support_iff_coeff_ne_zero.mp
lemma nonempty_support_iff : p.support.nonempty ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
by rw [ne.def, nonempty_iff_ne_empty, ne.def, ← support_eq_empty]
lemma support_C_mul_X_pow_nonzero {c : R} {n : ℕ} (h : c ≠ 0) :
(C c * X ^ n).support = singleton n :=
begin
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial],
exact support_single_ne_zero h
end
end semiring
section nonzero_semiring
variables [semiring R] [nontrivial R] {p q : polynomial R}
@[simp] lemma degree_one : degree (1 : polynomial R) = (0 : with_bot ℕ) :=
degree_C (show (1 : R) ≠ 0, from zero_ne_one.symm)
@[simp] lemma degree_X : degree (X : polynomial R) = 1 :=
degree_monomial _ one_ne_zero
@[simp] lemma nat_degree_X : (X : polynomial R).nat_degree = 1 :=
nat_degree_eq_of_degree_eq_some degree_X
end nonzero_semiring
section ring
variables [ring R]
lemma coeff_mul_X_sub_C {p : polynomial R} {r : R} {a : ℕ} :
coeff (p * (X - C r)) (a + 1) = coeff p a - coeff p (a + 1) * r :=
by simp [mul_sub]
lemma C_eq_int_cast (n : ℤ) : C (n : R) = n :=
(C : R →+* _).map_int_cast n
@[simp] lemma degree_neg (p : polynomial R) : degree (-p) = degree p :=
by unfold degree; rw support_neg
@[simp] lemma nat_degree_neg (p : polynomial R) : nat_degree (-p) = nat_degree p :=
by simp [nat_degree]
@[simp] lemma nat_degree_int_cast (n : ℤ) : nat_degree (n : polynomial R) = 0 :=
by simp only [←C_eq_int_cast, nat_degree_C]
end ring
section semiring
variables [semiring R]
/-- The second-highest coefficient, or 0 for constants -/
def next_coeff (p : polynomial R) : R :=
if p.nat_degree = 0 then 0 else p.coeff (p.nat_degree - 1)
@[simp]
lemma next_coeff_C_eq_zero (c : R) :
next_coeff (C c) = 0 := by { rw next_coeff, simp }
lemma next_coeff_of_pos_nat_degree (p : polynomial R) (hp : 0 < p.nat_degree) :
next_coeff p = p.coeff (p.nat_degree - 1) :=
by { rw [next_coeff, if_neg], contrapose! hp, simpa }
end semiring
section semiring
variables [semiring R] {p q : polynomial R} {ι : Type*}
lemma coeff_nat_degree_eq_zero_of_degree_lt (h : degree p < degree q) :
coeff p (nat_degree q) = 0 :=
coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le h degree_le_nat_degree)
lemma ne_zero_of_degree_gt {n : with_bot ℕ} (h : n < degree p) : p ≠ 0 :=
mt degree_eq_bot.2 (ne.symm (ne_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt bot_le h)))
lemma eq_C_of_degree_le_zero (h : degree p ≤ 0) : p = C (coeff p 0) :=
begin
ext (_|n), { simp },
rw [coeff_C, if_neg (nat.succ_ne_zero _), coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt],
exact h.trans_lt (with_bot.some_lt_some.2 n.succ_pos),
end
lemma eq_C_of_degree_eq_zero (h : degree p = 0) : p = C (coeff p 0) :=
eq_C_of_degree_le_zero (h ▸ le_refl _)
lemma degree_le_zero_iff : degree p ≤ 0 ↔ p = C (coeff p 0) :=
⟨eq_C_of_degree_le_zero, λ h, h.symm ▸ degree_C_le⟩
lemma degree_add_le (p q : polynomial R) : degree (p + q) ≤ max (degree p) (degree q) :=
calc degree (p + q) = ((p + q).support).sup some : rfl
... ≤ (p.support ∪ q.support).sup some : by convert sup_mono support_add
... = p.support.sup some ⊔ q.support.sup some : by convert sup_union
... = _ : with_bot.sup_eq_max _ _
@[simp] lemma leading_coeff_zero : leading_coeff (0 : polynomial R) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma leading_coeff_eq_zero : leading_coeff p = 0 ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨λ h, by_contradiction $ λ hp, mt mem_support_iff.1
(not_not.2 h) (mem_of_max (degree_eq_nat_degree hp)),
λ h, h.symm ▸ leading_coeff_zero⟩
lemma leading_coeff_eq_zero_iff_deg_eq_bot : leading_coeff p = 0 ↔ degree p = ⊥ :=
by rw [leading_coeff_eq_zero, degree_eq_bot]
lemma nat_degree_mem_support_of_nonzero (H : p ≠ 0) : p.nat_degree ∈ p.support :=
(p.mem_support_to_fun p.nat_degree).mpr ((not_congr leading_coeff_eq_zero).mpr H)
lemma nat_degree_eq_support_max' (h : p ≠ 0) :
p.nat_degree = p.support.max' (nonempty_support_iff.mpr h) :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ apply finset.le_max',
rw mem_support_iff_coeff_ne_zero,
exact (not_congr leading_coeff_eq_zero).mpr h, },
{ apply max'_le,
refine le_nat_degree_of_mem_supp, },
end
lemma nat_degree_C_mul_X_pow_le (a : R) (n : ℕ) : nat_degree (C a * X ^ n) ≤ n :=
begin
by_cases a0 : a = 0,
{ rw [a0, C_0, zero_mul, nat_degree_zero],
exact nat.zero_le n, },
{ rw nat_degree_eq_support_max',
{ simp_rw [support_C_mul_X_pow_nonzero a0, max'_singleton n], },
{ intro,
apply a0,
rw [← C_inj, C_0],
apply mul_X_pow_eq_zero ‹_›, }, },
end
lemma nat_degree_C_mul_X_pow_of_nonzero {a : R} (n : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
nat_degree (C a * X ^ n) = n :=
begin
rw nat_degree_eq_support_max',
{ simp_rw [support_C_mul_X_pow_nonzero ha, max'_singleton n], },
{ intro,
apply ha,
rw [← C_inj, C_0],
exact mul_X_pow_eq_zero ‹_›, },
end
lemma degree_add_eq_of_degree_lt (h : degree p < degree q) : degree (p + q) = degree q :=
le_antisymm (max_eq_right_of_lt h ▸ degree_add_le _ _) $ degree_le_degree $
begin
rw [coeff_add, coeff_nat_degree_eq_zero_of_degree_lt h, zero_add],
exact mt leading_coeff_eq_zero.1 (ne_zero_of_degree_gt h)
end
lemma degree_add_C (hp : 0 < degree p) : degree (p + C a) = degree p :=
add_comm (C a) p ▸ degree_add_eq_of_degree_lt $ lt_of_le_of_lt degree_C_le hp
lemma degree_add_eq_of_leading_coeff_add_ne_zero (h : leading_coeff p + leading_coeff q ≠ 0) :
degree (p + q) = max p.degree q.degree :=
le_antisymm (degree_add_le _ _) $
match lt_trichotomy (degree p) (degree q) with
| or.inl hlt :=
by rw [degree_add_eq_of_degree_lt hlt, max_eq_right_of_lt hlt]; exact le_refl _
| or.inr (or.inl heq) :=
le_of_not_gt $
assume hlt : max (degree p) (degree q) > degree (p + q),
h $ show leading_coeff p + leading_coeff q = 0,
begin
rw [heq, max_self] at hlt,
rw [leading_coeff, leading_coeff, nat_degree_eq_of_degree_eq heq, ← coeff_add],
exact coeff_nat_degree_eq_zero_of_degree_lt hlt
end
| or.inr (or.inr hlt) :=
by rw [add_comm, degree_add_eq_of_degree_lt hlt, max_eq_left_of_lt hlt]; exact le_refl _
end
lemma degree_erase_le (p : polynomial R) (n : ℕ) : degree (p.erase n) ≤ degree p :=
by convert sup_mono (erase_subset _ _)
lemma degree_erase_lt (hp : p ≠ 0) : degree (p.erase (nat_degree p)) < degree p :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (degree_erase_le _ _) $
(degree_eq_nat_degree hp).symm ▸ (by convert λ h, not_mem_erase _ _ (mem_of_max h))
lemma degree_sum_le (s : finset ι) (f : ι → polynomial R) :
degree (∑ i in s, f i) ≤ s.sup (λ b, degree (f b)) :=
finset.induction_on s (by simp only [sum_empty, sup_empty, degree_zero, le_refl]) $
assume a s has ih,
calc degree (∑ i in insert a s, f i) ≤ max (degree (f a)) (degree (∑ i in s, f i)) :
by rw sum_insert has; exact degree_add_le _ _
... ≤ _ : by rw [sup_insert, with_bot.sup_eq_max]; exact max_le_max (le_refl _) ih
lemma degree_mul_le (p q : polynomial R) : degree (p * q) ≤ degree p + degree q :=
calc degree (p * q) ≤ (p.support).sup (λi, degree (sum q (λj a, C (coeff p i * a) * X ^ (i + j)))) :
by simp only [single_eq_C_mul_X.symm]; exact degree_sum_le _ _
... ≤ p.support.sup (λi, q.support.sup (λj, degree (C (coeff p i * coeff q j) * X ^ (i + j)))) :
finset.sup_mono_fun (assume i hi, degree_sum_le _ _)
... ≤ degree p + degree q :
begin
refine finset.sup_le (λ a ha, finset.sup_le (λ b hb, le_trans (degree_C_mul_X_pow_le _ _) _)),
rw [with_bot.coe_add],
rw mem_support_iff at ha hb,
exact add_le_add (le_degree_of_ne_zero ha) (le_degree_of_ne_zero hb)
end
lemma degree_pow_le (p : polynomial R) : ∀ n, degree (p ^ n) ≤ n •ℕ (degree p)
| 0 := by rw [pow_zero, zero_nsmul]; exact degree_one_le
| (n+1) := calc degree (p ^ (n + 1)) ≤ degree p + degree (p ^ n) :
by rw pow_succ; exact degree_mul_le _ _
... ≤ _ : by rw succ_nsmul; exact add_le_add (le_refl _) (degree_pow_le _)
@[simp] lemma leading_coeff_monomial (a : R) (n : ℕ) : leading_coeff (C a * X ^ n) = a :=
begin
by_cases ha : a = 0,
{ simp only [ha, C_0, zero_mul, leading_coeff_zero] },
{ rw [leading_coeff, nat_degree_C_mul_X_pow _ _ ha, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial],
exact @finsupp.single_eq_same _ _ _ n a }
end
@[simp] lemma leading_coeff_monomial' (a : R) (n : ℕ) : leading_coeff (monomial n a) = a :=
by rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, leading_coeff_monomial]
@[simp] lemma leading_coeff_C (a : R) : leading_coeff (C a) = a :=
suffices leading_coeff (C a * X^0) = a, by rwa [pow_zero, mul_one] at this,
leading_coeff_monomial a 0
@[simp] lemma leading_coeff_X : leading_coeff (X : polynomial R) = 1 :=
suffices leading_coeff (C (1:R) * X^1) = 1, by rwa [C_1, pow_one, one_mul] at this,
leading_coeff_monomial 1 1
@[simp] lemma monic_X : monic (X : polynomial R) := leading_coeff_X
@[simp] lemma leading_coeff_one : leading_coeff (1 : polynomial R) = 1 :=
suffices leading_coeff (C (1:R) * X^0) = 1, by rwa [C_1, pow_zero, mul_one] at this,
leading_coeff_monomial 1 0
@[simp] lemma monic_one : monic (1 : polynomial R) := leading_coeff_C _
lemma monic.ne_zero {R : Type*} [semiring R] [nontrivial R] {p : polynomial R} (hp : p.monic) :
p ≠ 0 :=
by { rintro rfl, simpa [monic] using hp }
lemma monic.ne_zero_of_ne (h : (0:R) ≠ 1) {p : polynomial R} (hp : p.monic) :
p ≠ 0 :=
by { nontriviality R, exact hp.ne_zero }
lemma monic.ne_zero_of_polynomial_ne {r} (hp : monic p) (hne : q ≠ r) : p ≠ 0 :=
by { haveI := nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne hne, exact hp.ne_zero }
lemma leading_coeff_add_of_degree_lt (h : degree p < degree q) :
leading_coeff (p + q) = leading_coeff q :=
have coeff p (nat_degree q) = 0, from coeff_nat_degree_eq_zero_of_degree_lt h,
by simp only [leading_coeff, nat_degree_eq_of_degree_eq (degree_add_eq_of_degree_lt h),
this, coeff_add, zero_add]
lemma leading_coeff_add_of_degree_eq (h : degree p = degree q)
(hlc : leading_coeff p + leading_coeff q ≠ 0) :
leading_coeff (p + q) = leading_coeff p + leading_coeff q :=
have nat_degree (p + q) = nat_degree p,
by apply nat_degree_eq_of_degree_eq;
rw [degree_add_eq_of_leading_coeff_add_ne_zero hlc, h, max_self],
by simp only [leading_coeff, this, nat_degree_eq_of_degree_eq h, coeff_add]
@[simp] lemma coeff_mul_degree_add_degree (p q : polynomial R) :
coeff (p * q) (nat_degree p + nat_degree q) = leading_coeff p * leading_coeff q :=
calc coeff (p * q) (nat_degree p + nat_degree q) =
∑ x in nat.antidiagonal (nat_degree p + nat_degree q),
coeff p x.1 * coeff q x.2 : coeff_mul _ _ _
... = coeff p (nat_degree p) * coeff q (nat_degree q) :
begin
refine finset.sum_eq_single (nat_degree p, nat_degree q) _ _,
{ rintro ⟨i,j⟩ h₁ h₂, rw nat.mem_antidiagonal at h₁,
by_cases H : nat_degree p < i,
{ rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt
(lt_of_le_of_lt degree_le_nat_degree (with_bot.coe_lt_coe.2 H)), zero_mul] },
{ rw not_lt_iff_eq_or_lt at H, cases H,
{ subst H, rw add_left_cancel_iff at h₁, dsimp at h₁, subst h₁, exfalso, exact h₂ rfl },
{ suffices : nat_degree q < j,
{ rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt
(lt_of_le_of_lt degree_le_nat_degree (with_bot.coe_lt_coe.2 this)), mul_zero] },
{ by_contra H', rw not_lt at H',
exact ne_of_lt (nat.lt_of_lt_of_le
(nat.add_lt_add_right H j) (nat.add_le_add_left H' _)) h₁ } } } },
{ intro H, exfalso, apply H, rw nat.mem_antidiagonal }
end
lemma degree_mul' (h : leading_coeff p * leading_coeff q ≠ 0) :
degree (p * q) = degree p + degree q :=
have hp : p ≠ 0 := by refine mt _ h; exact λ hp, by rw [hp, leading_coeff_zero, zero_mul],
have hq : q ≠ 0 := by refine mt _ h; exact λ hq, by rw [hq, leading_coeff_zero, mul_zero],
le_antisymm (degree_mul_le _ _)
begin
rw [degree_eq_nat_degree hp, degree_eq_nat_degree hq],
refine le_degree_of_ne_zero _,
rwa coeff_mul_degree_add_degree
end
lemma nat_degree_mul' (h : leading_coeff p * leading_coeff q ≠ 0) :
nat_degree (p * q) = nat_degree p + nat_degree q :=
have hp : p ≠ 0 := mt leading_coeff_eq_zero.2 (λ h₁, h $ by rw [h₁, zero_mul]),
have hq : q ≠ 0 := mt leading_coeff_eq_zero.2 (λ h₁, h $ by rw [h₁, mul_zero]),
have hpq : p * q ≠ 0 := λ hpq, by rw [← coeff_mul_degree_add_degree, hpq, coeff_zero] at h;
exact h rfl,
option.some_inj.1 (show (nat_degree (p * q) : with_bot ℕ) = nat_degree p + nat_degree q,
by rw [← degree_eq_nat_degree hpq, degree_mul' h, degree_eq_nat_degree hp,
degree_eq_nat_degree hq])
lemma leading_coeff_mul' (h : leading_coeff p * leading_coeff q ≠ 0) :
leading_coeff (p * q) = leading_coeff p * leading_coeff q :=
begin
unfold leading_coeff,
rw [nat_degree_mul' h, coeff_mul_degree_add_degree],
refl
end
lemma leading_coeff_pow' : leading_coeff p ^ n ≠ 0 →
leading_coeff (p ^ n) = leading_coeff p ^ n :=
nat.rec_on n (by simp) $
λ n ih h,
have h₁ : leading_coeff p ^ n ≠ 0 :=
λ h₁, h $ by rw [pow_succ, h₁, mul_zero],
have h₂ : leading_coeff p * leading_coeff (p ^ n) ≠ 0 :=
by rwa [pow_succ, ← ih h₁] at h,
by rw [pow_succ, pow_succ, leading_coeff_mul' h₂, ih h₁]
lemma degree_pow' : ∀ {n}, leading_coeff p ^ n ≠ 0 →
degree (p ^ n) = n •ℕ (degree p)
| 0 := λ h, by rw [pow_zero, ← C_1] at *;
rw [degree_C h, zero_nsmul]
| (n+1) := λ h,
have h₁ : leading_coeff p ^ n ≠ 0 := λ h₁, h $
by rw [pow_succ, h₁, mul_zero],
have h₂ : leading_coeff p * leading_coeff (p ^ n) ≠ 0 :=
by rwa [pow_succ, ← leading_coeff_pow' h₁] at h,
by rw [pow_succ, degree_mul' h₂, succ_nsmul, degree_pow' h₁]
lemma nat_degree_pow' {n : ℕ} (h : leading_coeff p ^ n ≠ 0) :
nat_degree (p ^ n) = n * nat_degree p :=
if hp0 : p = 0 then
if hn0 : n = 0 then by simp *
else by rw [hp0, zero_pow (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn0)]; simp
else
have hpn : p ^ n ≠ 0, from λ hpn0, have h1 : _ := h,
by rw [← leading_coeff_pow' h1, hpn0, leading_coeff_zero] at h;
exact h rfl,
option.some_inj.1 $ show (nat_degree (p ^ n) : with_bot ℕ) = (n * nat_degree p : ℕ),
by rw [← degree_eq_nat_degree hpn, degree_pow' h, degree_eq_nat_degree hp0,
← with_bot.coe_nsmul]; simp
@[simp] lemma leading_coeff_X_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, leading_coeff ((X : polynomial R) ^ n) = 1
| 0 := by simp
| (n+1) :=
if h10 : (1 : R) = 0
then by rw [pow_succ, ← one_mul X, ← C_1, h10]; simp
else
have h : leading_coeff (X : polynomial R) * leading_coeff (X ^ n) ≠ 0,
by rw [leading_coeff_X, leading_coeff_X_pow n, one_mul];
exact h10,
by rw [pow_succ, leading_coeff_mul' h, leading_coeff_X, leading_coeff_X_pow, one_mul]
theorem leading_coeff_mul_X_pow {p : polynomial R} {n : ℕ} :
leading_coeff (p * X ^ n) = leading_coeff p :=
decidable.by_cases
(λ H : leading_coeff p = 0, by rw [H, leading_coeff_eq_zero.1 H, zero_mul, leading_coeff_zero])
(λ H : leading_coeff p ≠ 0,
by rw [leading_coeff_mul', leading_coeff_X_pow, mul_one];
rwa [leading_coeff_X_pow, mul_one])
lemma nat_degree_mul_le {p q : polynomial R} : nat_degree (p * q) ≤ nat_degree p + nat_degree q :=
begin
apply nat_degree_le_of_degree_le,
apply le_trans (degree_mul_le p q),
rw with_bot.coe_add,
refine add_le_add _ _; apply degree_le_nat_degree,
end
lemma subsingleton_of_monic_zero (h : monic (0 : polynomial R)) :
(∀ p q : polynomial R, p = q) ∧ (∀ a b : R, a = b) :=
by rw [monic.def, leading_coeff_zero] at h;
exact ⟨λ p q, by rw [← mul_one p, ← mul_one q, ← C_1, ← h, C_0, mul_zero, mul_zero],
λ a b, by rw [← mul_one a, ← mul_one b, ← h, mul_zero, mul_zero]⟩
lemma zero_le_degree_iff {p : polynomial R} : 0 ≤ degree p ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
by rw [ne.def, ← degree_eq_bot];
cases degree p; exact dec_trivial
lemma degree_nonneg_iff_ne_zero : 0 ≤ degree p ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
⟨λ h0p hp0, absurd h0p (by rw [hp0, degree_zero]; exact dec_trivial),
λ hp0, le_of_not_gt (λ h, by simp [gt, degree_eq_bot, *] at *)⟩
lemma nat_degree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero : p.nat_degree = 0 ↔ p.degree ≤ 0 :=
by rw [← le_zero_iff_eq, nat_degree_le_iff_degree_le, with_bot.coe_zero]
theorem degree_le_iff_coeff_zero (f : polynomial R) (n : with_bot ℕ) :
degree f ≤ n ↔ ∀ m : ℕ, n < m → coeff f m = 0 :=
⟨λ (H : finset.sup (f.support) some ≤ n) m (Hm : n < (m : with_bot ℕ)), decidable.of_not_not $ λ H4,
have H1 : m ∉ f.support,
from λ H2, not_lt_of_ge ((finset.sup_le_iff.1 H) m H2 : ((m : with_bot ℕ) ≤ n)) Hm,
H1 $ (finsupp.mem_support_to_fun f m).2 H4,
λ H, finset.sup_le $ λ b Hb, decidable.of_not_not $ λ Hn,
(finsupp.mem_support_to_fun f b).1 Hb $ H b $ lt_of_not_ge Hn⟩
theorem degree_lt_iff_coeff_zero (f : polynomial R) (n : ℕ) :
degree f < n ↔ ∀ m : ℕ, n ≤ m → coeff f m = 0 :=
begin
refine ⟨λ hf m hm, coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le hf (with_bot.coe_le_coe.2 hm)), _⟩,
simp only [degree, finset.sup_lt_iff (with_bot.bot_lt_coe n), mem_support_iff,
with_bot.some_eq_coe, with_bot.coe_lt_coe, ← @not_le ℕ],
exact λ h m, mt (h m),
end
lemma degree_lt_degree_mul_X (hp : p ≠ 0) : p.degree < (p * X).degree :=
by haveI := nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne hp; exact
have leading_coeff p * leading_coeff X ≠ 0, by simpa,
by erw [degree_mul' this, degree_eq_nat_degree hp,
degree_X, ← with_bot.coe_one, ← with_bot.coe_add, with_bot.coe_lt_coe];
exact nat.lt_succ_self _
lemma nat_degree_pos_iff_degree_pos {p : polynomial R} :
0 < nat_degree p ↔ 0 < degree p :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le nat_degree_le_iff_degree_le
lemma eq_C_of_nat_degree_le_zero {p : polynomial R} (h : nat_degree p ≤ 0) : p = C (coeff p 0) :=
eq_C_of_degree_le_zero $ degree_le_of_nat_degree_le h
lemma eq_C_of_nat_degree_eq_zero {p : polynomial R} (h : nat_degree p = 0) : p = C (coeff p 0) :=
eq_C_of_nat_degree_le_zero h.le
end semiring
section nonzero_semiring
variables [semiring R] [nontrivial R] {p q : polynomial R}
@[simp] lemma degree_X_pow (n : ℕ) : degree ((X : polynomial R) ^ n) = n :=
by rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, degree_monomial _ (@one_ne_zero R _ _)]
theorem not_is_unit_X : ¬ is_unit (X : polynomial R) :=
λ ⟨⟨_, g, hfg, hgf⟩, rfl⟩, @zero_ne_one R _ _ $ by { rw [← coeff_one_zero, ← hgf], simp }
end nonzero_semiring
section ring
variables [ring R] {p q : polynomial R}
lemma degree_sub_le (p q : polynomial R) : degree (p - q) ≤ max (degree p) (degree q) :=
degree_neg q ▸ degree_add_le p (-q)
lemma degree_sub_lt (hd : degree p = degree q)
(hp0 : p ≠ 0) (hlc : leading_coeff p = leading_coeff q) :
degree (p - q) < degree p :=
have hp : single (nat_degree p) (leading_coeff p) + p.erase (nat_degree p) = p :=
finsupp.single_add_erase _ _,
have hq : single (nat_degree q) (leading_coeff q) + q.erase (nat_degree q) = q :=
finsupp.single_add_erase _ _,
have hd' : nat_degree p = nat_degree q := by unfold nat_degree; rw hd,
have hq0 : q ≠ 0 := mt degree_eq_bot.2 (hd ▸ mt degree_eq_bot.1 hp0),
calc degree (p - q) = degree (erase (nat_degree q) p + -erase (nat_degree q) q) :
by conv {to_lhs, rw [← hp, ← hq, hlc, hd', add_sub_add_left_eq_sub, sub_eq_add_neg]}
... ≤ max (degree (erase (nat_degree q) p)) (degree (erase (nat_degree q) q))
: degree_neg (erase (nat_degree q) q) ▸ degree_add_le _ _
... < degree p : max_lt_iff.2 ⟨hd' ▸ degree_erase_lt hp0, hd.symm ▸ degree_erase_lt hq0⟩
lemma nat_degree_X_sub_C_le {r : R} : (X - C r).nat_degree ≤ 1 :=
nat_degree_le_iff_degree_le.2 $ le_trans (degree_sub_le _ _) $ max_le degree_X_le $
le_trans degree_C_le $ with_bot.coe_le_coe.2 zero_le_one
end ring
section nonzero_ring
variables [nontrivial R] [ring R]
@[simp] lemma degree_X_sub_C (a : R) : degree (X - C a) = 1 :=
begin
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, ← @degree_X R],
by_cases ha : a = 0,
{ simp only [ha, C_0, neg_zero, zero_add] },
exact degree_add_eq_of_degree_lt (by rw [degree_X, degree_neg, degree_C ha]; exact dec_trivial)
end
@[simp] lemma nat_degree_X_sub_C (x : R) : (X - C x).nat_degree = 1 :=
nat_degree_eq_of_degree_eq_some $ degree_X_sub_C x
@[simp]
lemma next_coeff_X_sub_C (c : R) : next_coeff (X - C c) = - c :=
by simp [next_coeff_of_pos_nat_degree]
lemma degree_X_pow_sub_C {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (a : R) :
degree ((X : polynomial R) ^ n - C a) = n :=
have degree (-C a) < degree ((X : polynomial R) ^ n),
from calc degree (-C a) ≤ 0 : by rw degree_neg; exact degree_C_le
... < degree ((X : polynomial R) ^ n) : by rwa [degree_X_pow];
exact with_bot.coe_lt_coe.2 hn,
by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, degree_add_eq_of_degree_lt this, degree_X_pow]
lemma X_pow_sub_C_ne_zero {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (a : R) :
(X : polynomial R) ^ n - C a ≠ 0 :=
mt degree_eq_bot.2 (show degree ((X : polynomial R) ^ n - C a) ≠ ⊥,
by rw degree_X_pow_sub_C hn a; exact dec_trivial)
theorem X_sub_C_ne_zero (r : R) : X - C r ≠ 0 :=
pow_one (X : polynomial R) ▸ X_pow_sub_C_ne_zero zero_lt_one r
lemma nat_degree_X_pow_sub_C {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) {r : R} :
(X ^ n - C r).nat_degree = n :=
by { apply nat_degree_eq_of_degree_eq_some, simp [degree_X_pow_sub_C hn], }
end nonzero_ring
section integral_domain
variables [integral_domain R] {p q : polynomial R}
@[simp] lemma degree_mul : degree (p * q) = degree p + degree q :=
if hp0 : p = 0 then by simp only [hp0, degree_zero, zero_mul, with_bot.bot_add]
else if hq0 : q = 0 then by simp only [hq0, degree_zero, mul_zero, with_bot.add_bot]
else degree_mul' $ mul_ne_zero (mt leading_coeff_eq_zero.1 hp0)
(mt leading_coeff_eq_zero.1 hq0)
@[simp] lemma degree_pow (p : polynomial R) (n : ℕ) :
degree (p ^ n) = n •ℕ (degree p) :=
by induction n; [simp only [pow_zero, degree_one, zero_nsmul],
simp only [*, pow_succ, succ_nsmul, degree_mul]]
@[simp] lemma leading_coeff_mul (p q : polynomial R) : leading_coeff (p * q) =
leading_coeff p * leading_coeff q :=
begin
by_cases hp : p = 0,
{ simp only [hp, zero_mul, leading_coeff_zero] },
{ by_cases hq : q = 0,
{ simp only [hq, mul_zero, leading_coeff_zero] },
{ rw [leading_coeff_mul'],
exact mul_ne_zero (mt leading_coeff_eq_zero.1 hp) (mt leading_coeff_eq_zero.1 hq) } }
end
@[simp] lemma leading_coeff_X_add_C (a b : R) (ha : a ≠ 0):
leading_coeff (C a * X + C b) = a :=
begin
rw [add_comm, leading_coeff_add_of_degree_lt],
{ simp },
{ simpa [degree_C ha] using lt_of_le_of_lt degree_C_le (with_bot.coe_lt_coe.2 zero_lt_one)}
end
/-- `polynomial.leading_coeff` bundled as a `monoid_hom` when `R` is an `integral_domain`, and thus
`leading_coeff` is multiplicative -/
def leading_coeff_hom : polynomial R →* R :=
{ to_fun := leading_coeff,
map_one' := by simp,
map_mul' := leading_coeff_mul }
@[simp] lemma leading_coeff_hom_apply (p : polynomial R) :
leading_coeff_hom p = leading_coeff p := rfl
@[simp] lemma leading_coeff_pow (p : polynomial R) (n : ℕ) :
leading_coeff (p ^ n) = leading_coeff p ^ n :=
leading_coeff_hom.map_pow p n
end integral_domain
end polynomial
|
d0978da2ee521ae5bf153e608edc26000491954c | 63abd62053d479eae5abf4951554e1064a4c45b4 | /src/ring_theory/derivation.lean | 6c26455cd83f9e546fd576313a318fd9fc6628e7 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Lix0120/mathlib | 0020745240315ed0e517cbf32e738d8f9811dd80 | e14c37827456fc6707f31b4d1d16f1f3a3205e91 | refs/heads/master | 1,673,102,855,024 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 308,930,245 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,604,164,710,000 | 1,604,163,547,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,061 | lean | /-
Copyright © 2020 Nicolò Cavalleri. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Nicolò Cavalleri.
-/
import algebra.lie.basic
import ring_theory.algebra_tower
/-!
# Derivations
This file defines derivation. A derivation `D` from the `R`-algebra `A` to the `A`-module `M` is an
`R`-linear map that satisfy the Leibniz rule `D (a * b) = a * D b + D a * b`.
## Notation
The notation `⁅D1, D2⁆` is used for the commutator of two derivations.
TODO: this file is just a stub to go on with some PRs in the geometry section. It only
implements the definition of derivations in commutative algebra. This will soon change: as soon
as bimodules will be there in mathlib I will change this file to take into account the
non-commutative case. Any development on the theory of derivations is discouraged until the
definitive definition of derivation will be implemented.
-/
open algebra ring_hom
/-- `D : derivation R A M` is an `R`-linear map from `A` to `M` that satisfies the `leibniz`
equality.
TODO: update this when bimodules are defined. -/
@[protect_proj]
structure derivation (R : Type*) (A : Type*) [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring A]
[algebra R A] (M : Type*) [add_cancel_comm_monoid M] [semimodule A M] [semimodule R M]
[is_scalar_tower R A M]
extends A →ₗ[R] M :=
(leibniz' (a b : A) : to_fun (a * b) = a • to_fun b + b • to_fun a)
namespace derivation
section
variables {R : Type*} [comm_semiring R]
variables {A : Type*} [comm_semiring A] [algebra R A]
variables {M : Type*} [add_cancel_comm_monoid M] [semimodule A M] [semimodule R M]
variables [is_scalar_tower R A M]
variables (D : derivation R A M) {D1 D2 : derivation R A M} (r : R) (a b : A)
instance : has_coe_to_fun (derivation R A M) := ⟨_, λ D, D.to_linear_map.to_fun⟩
instance has_coe_to_linear_map : has_coe (derivation R A M) (A →ₗ[R] M) :=
⟨λ D, D.to_linear_map⟩
@[simp] lemma to_fun_eq_coe : D.to_fun = ⇑D := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_fn_coe (f : derivation R A M) :
⇑(f : A →ₗ[R] M) = f := rfl
lemma coe_injective (H : ⇑D1 = D2) : D1 = D2 :=
by { cases D1, cases D2, congr', exact linear_map.coe_injective H }
@[ext] theorem ext (H : ∀ a, D1 a = D2 a) : D1 = D2 :=
coe_injective $ funext H
@[simp] lemma map_add : D (a + b) = D a + D b := is_add_hom.map_add D a b
@[simp] lemma map_zero : D 0 = 0 := is_add_monoid_hom.map_zero D
@[simp] lemma map_smul : D (r • a) = r • D a := linear_map.map_smul D r a
@[simp] lemma leibniz : D (a * b) = a • D b + b • D a := D.leibniz' _ _
@[simp] lemma map_one_eq_zero : D 1 = 0 :=
begin
have h : D 1 = D (1 * 1) := by rw mul_one,
rw [leibniz D 1 1, one_smul] at h,
exact eq_zero_of_left_cancel_add_self h,
end
@[simp] lemma map_algebra_map : D (algebra_map R A r) = 0 :=
by rw [←mul_one r, ring_hom.map_mul, map_one, ←smul_def, map_smul, map_one_eq_zero, smul_zero]
instance : has_zero (derivation R A M) :=
⟨⟨(0 : A →ₗ[R] M), λ a b, by simp only [add_zero, linear_map.zero_apply,
linear_map.to_fun_eq_coe, smul_zero]⟩⟩
instance : inhabited (derivation R A M) := ⟨0⟩
instance : add_comm_monoid (derivation R A M) :=
{ add := λ D1 D2, ⟨D1 + D2, λ a b, by { simp only [leibniz, linear_map.add_apply,
linear_map.to_fun_eq_coe, coe_fn_coe, smul_add], cc }⟩,
add_assoc := λ D E F, ext $ λ a, add_assoc _ _ _,
zero_add := λ D, ext $ λ a, zero_add _,
add_zero := λ D, ext $ λ a, add_zero _,
add_comm := λ D E, ext $ λ a, add_comm _ _,
..derivation.has_zero }
@[simp] lemma add_apply : (D1 + D2) a = D1 a + D2 a := rfl
@[priority 100]
instance derivation.Rsemimodule : semimodule R (derivation R A M) :=
{ smul := λ r D, ⟨r • D, λ a b, by simp only [linear_map.smul_apply, leibniz,
linear_map.to_fun_eq_coe, smul_algebra_smul_comm, coe_fn_coe, smul_add, add_comm],⟩,
mul_smul := λ a1 a2 D, ext $ λ b, mul_smul _ _ _,
one_smul := λ D, ext $ λ b, one_smul _ _,
smul_add := λ a D1 D2, ext $ λ b, smul_add _ _ _,
smul_zero := λ a, ext $ λ b, smul_zero _,
add_smul := λ a1 a2 D, ext $ λ b, add_smul _ _ _,
zero_smul := λ D, ext $ λ b, zero_smul _ _ }
@[simp] lemma smul_to_linear_map_coe : ↑(r • D) = (r • D : A →ₗ[R] M) := rfl
@[simp] lemma Rsmul_apply : (r • D) a = r • D a := rfl
instance : semimodule A (derivation R A M) :=
{ smul := λ a D, ⟨⟨λ b, a • D b,
λ a1 a2, by rw [D.map_add, smul_add],
λ a1 a2, by rw [D.map_smul, smul_algebra_smul_comm]⟩,
λ b c, by { dsimp, simp only [smul_add, leibniz, smul_comm, add_comm] }⟩,
mul_smul := λ a1 a2 D, ext $ λ b, mul_smul _ _ _,
one_smul := λ D, ext $ λ b, one_smul A _,
smul_add := λ a D1 D2, ext $ λ b, smul_add _ _ _,
smul_zero := λ a, ext $ λ b, smul_zero _,
add_smul := λ a1 a2 D, ext $ λ b, add_smul _ _ _,
zero_smul := λ D, ext $ λ b, zero_smul A _ }
@[simp] lemma smul_apply : (a • D) b = a • D b := rfl
instance : is_scalar_tower R A (derivation R A M) :=
⟨λ x y z, ext (λ a, smul_assoc _ _ _)⟩
end
section
variables {R : Type*} [comm_ring R]
variables {A : Type*} [comm_ring A] [algebra R A]
section
variables {M : Type*} [add_comm_group M] [module A M] [module R M] [is_scalar_tower R A M]
variables (D : derivation R A M) {D1 D2 : derivation R A M} (r : R) (a b : A)
@[simp] lemma map_neg : D (-a) = -D a := linear_map.map_neg D a
@[simp] lemma map_sub : D (a - b) = D a - D b := linear_map.map_sub D a b
instance : add_comm_group (derivation R A M) :=
{ neg := λ D, ⟨-D, λ a b, by simp only [linear_map.neg_apply, smul_neg, neg_add_rev, leibniz,
linear_map.to_fun_eq_coe, coe_fn_coe, add_comm]⟩,
add_left_neg := λ D, ext $ λ a, add_left_neg _,
..derivation.add_comm_monoid }
end
section lie_structures
/-! # Lie structures -/
variables (D : derivation R A A) {D1 D2 : derivation R A A} (r : R) (a b : A)
open ring_commutator
/-- The commutator of derivations is again a derivation. -/
def commutator (D1 D2 : derivation R A A) : derivation R A A :=
⟨⁅D1, D2⁆, λ a b, by {simp only [commutator, map_add, id.smul_eq_mul, linear_map.mul_app,
leibniz, linear_map.to_fun_eq_coe, coe_fn_coe, linear_map.sub_apply], ring }⟩
instance : has_bracket (derivation R A A) := ⟨derivation.commutator⟩
@[simp] lemma commutator_coe_linear_map : ↑⁅D1, D2⁆ = (⁅D1, D2⁆ : A →ₗ[R] A) := rfl
lemma commutator_apply : ⁅D1, D2⁆ a = D1 (D2 a) - D2 (D1 a) := rfl
instance : lie_ring (derivation R A A) :=
{ add_lie := λ d e f, by { ext a, simp only [commutator_apply, add_apply, map_add], ring },
lie_add := λ d e f, by { ext a, simp only [commutator_apply, add_apply, map_add], ring },
lie_self := λ d, by { ext a, simp only [commutator_apply, add_apply, map_add], ring },
jacobi := λ d e f, by { ext a, simp only [commutator_apply, add_apply, map_sub], ring } }
instance : lie_algebra R (derivation R A A) :=
{ lie_smul := λ r d e, by { ext a, simp only [commutator_apply, map_smul, smul_sub, Rsmul_apply]},
..derivation.Rsemimodule }
end lie_structures
end
end derivation
section comp_der
namespace linear_map
variables {R : Type*} [comm_semiring R]
variables {A : Type*} [comm_semiring A] [algebra R A]
variables {M : Type*} [add_cancel_comm_monoid M] [semimodule A M] [semimodule R M]
variables {N : Type*} [add_cancel_comm_monoid N] [semimodule A N] [semimodule R N]
variables [is_scalar_tower R A M] [is_scalar_tower R A N]
/-- The composition of a linear map and a derivation is a derivation. -/
def comp_der (f : M →ₗ[A] N) (D : derivation R A M) : derivation R A N :=
{ to_fun := λ a, f (D a),
map_add' := λ a1 a2, by rw [D.map_add, f.map_add],
map_smul' := λ r a, by rw [derivation.map_smul, map_smul_eq_smul_map],
leibniz' := λ a b, by simp only [derivation.leibniz, linear_map.map_smul, linear_map.map_add, add_comm] }
@[simp] lemma comp_der_apply (f : M →ₗ[A] N) (D : derivation R A M) (a : A) :
f.comp_der D a = f (D a) := rfl
end linear_map
end comp_der
|
f1ab4d0002e3fc4f716f6ee6b2462a6a1b27b7d0 | bb31430994044506fa42fd667e2d556327e18dfe | /src/analysis/normed/group/basic.lean | 3eba78c8551d9981b7810ae98c212f00178c04f9 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | sgouezel/mathlib | 0cb4e5335a2ba189fa7af96d83a377f83270e503 | 00638177efd1b2534fc5269363ebf42a7871df9a | refs/heads/master | 1,674,527,483,042 | 1,673,665,568,000 | 1,673,665,568,000 | 119,598,202 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,517,348,647,000 | 1,517,348,646,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 82,343 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl, Yaël Dillies
-/
import analysis.normed.group.seminorm
import order.liminf_limsup
import topology.algebra.uniform_group
import topology.metric_space.algebra
import topology.metric_space.isometry
import topology.sequences
/-!
# Normed (semi)groups
In this file we define 10 classes:
* `has_norm`, `has_nnnorm`: auxiliary classes endowing a type `α` with a function `norm : α → ℝ`
(notation: `‖x‖`) and `nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0` (notation: `‖x‖₊`), respectively;
* `seminormed_..._group`: A seminormed (additive) (commutative) group is an (additive) (commutative)
group with a norm and a compatible pseudometric space structure:
`∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖` or `∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖`, depending on the group operation.
* `normed_..._group`: A normed (additive) (commutative) group is an (additive) (commutative) group
with a norm and a compatible metric space structure.
We also prove basic properties of (semi)normed groups and provide some instances.
## Notes
The current convention `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` means that the distance is invariant under right
addition, but actions in mathlib are usually from the left. This means we might want to change it to
`dist x y = ‖-x + y‖`.
The normed group hierarchy would lend itself well to a mixin design (that is, having
`seminormed_group` and `seminormed_add_group` not extend `group` and `add_group`), but we choose not
to for performance concerns.
## Tags
normed group
-/
variables {𝓕 𝕜 α ι κ E F G : Type*}
open filter function metric
open_locale big_operators ennreal filter nnreal uniformity pointwise topological_space
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `E` with a function `norm : E → ℝ` with notation `‖x‖`. This
class is designed to be extended in more interesting classes specifying the properties of the norm.
-/
@[notation_class] class has_norm (E : Type*) := (norm : E → ℝ)
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `α` with a function `nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0` with notation `‖x‖₊`. -/
@[notation_class] class has_nnnorm (E : Type*) := (nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0)
export has_norm (norm)
export has_nnnorm (nnnorm)
notation `‖` e `‖` := norm e
notation `‖` e `‖₊` := nnnorm e
/-- A seminormed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
class seminormed_add_group (E : Type*) extends has_norm E, add_group E, pseudo_metric_space E :=
(dist := λ x y, ‖x - y‖)
(dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ . obviously)
/-- A seminormed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a
pseudometric space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class seminormed_group (E : Type*) extends has_norm E, group E, pseudo_metric_space E :=
(dist := λ x y, ‖x / y‖)
(dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ . obviously)
/-- A normed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` defines a
metric space structure. -/
class normed_add_group (E : Type*) extends has_norm E, add_group E, metric_space E :=
(dist := λ x y, ‖x - y‖)
(dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ . obviously)
/-- A normed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a metric
space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class normed_group (E : Type*) extends has_norm E, group E, metric_space E :=
(dist := λ x y, ‖x / y‖)
(dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ . obviously)
/-- A seminormed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
class seminormed_add_comm_group (E : Type*)
extends has_norm E, add_comm_group E, pseudo_metric_space E :=
(dist := λ x y, ‖x - y‖)
(dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ . obviously)
/-- A seminormed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class seminormed_comm_group (E : Type*)
extends has_norm E, comm_group E, pseudo_metric_space E :=
(dist := λ x y, ‖x / y‖)
(dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ . obviously)
/-- A normed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` defines a
metric space structure. -/
class normed_add_comm_group (E : Type*) extends has_norm E, add_comm_group E, metric_space E :=
(dist := λ x y, ‖x - y‖)
(dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ . obviously)
/-- A normed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a metric
space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class normed_comm_group (E : Type*) extends has_norm E, comm_group E, metric_space E :=
(dist := λ x y, ‖x / y‖)
(dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ . obviously)
@[priority 100, to_additive] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_group.to_seminormed_group [normed_group E] : seminormed_group E :=
{ ..‹normed_group E› }
@[priority 100, to_additive] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_comm_group.to_seminormed_comm_group [normed_comm_group E] :
seminormed_comm_group E :=
{ ..‹normed_comm_group E› }
@[priority 100, to_additive] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance seminormed_comm_group.to_seminormed_group [seminormed_comm_group E] : seminormed_group E :=
{ ..‹seminormed_comm_group E› }
@[priority 100, to_additive] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_comm_group.to_normed_group [normed_comm_group E] : normed_group E :=
{ ..‹normed_comm_group E› }
/-- Construct a `normed_group` from a `seminormed_group` satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1`. This
avoids having to go back to the `(pseudo_)metric_space` level when declaring a `normed_group`
instance as a special case of a more general `seminormed_group` instance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a `normed_add_group` from a `seminormed_add_group` satisfying
`∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0`. This avoids having to go back to the `(pseudo_)metric_space` level when
declaring a `normed_add_group` instance as a special case of a more general `seminormed_add_group`
instance.", reducible] -- See note [reducible non-instances]
def normed_group.of_separation [seminormed_group E] (h : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1) :
normed_group E :=
{ to_metric_space :=
{ eq_of_dist_eq_zero := λ x y hxy, div_eq_one.1 $ h _ $ by rwa ←‹seminormed_group E›.dist_eq },
..‹seminormed_group E› }
/-- Construct a `normed_comm_group` from a `seminormed_comm_group` satisfying
`∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1`. This avoids having to go back to the `(pseudo_)metric_space` level when
declaring a `normed_comm_group` instance as a special case of a more general `seminormed_comm_group`
instance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a `normed_add_comm_group` from a `seminormed_add_comm_group` satisfying
`∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0`. This avoids having to go back to the `(pseudo_)metric_space` level when
declaring a `normed_add_comm_group` instance as a special case of a more general
`seminormed_add_comm_group` instance.", reducible] -- See note [reducible non-instances]
def normed_comm_group.of_separation [seminormed_comm_group E] (h : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1) :
normed_comm_group E :=
{ ..‹seminormed_comm_group E›, ..normed_group.of_separation h }
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant distance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant distance."]
def seminormed_group.of_mul_dist [has_norm E] [group E] [pseudo_metric_space E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
seminormed_group E :=
{ dist_eq := λ x y, begin
rw h₁, apply le_antisymm,
{ simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_right_inv y] using h₂ _ _ _ },
{ simpa only [div_mul_cancel', one_mul] using h₂ (x/y) 1 y }
end }
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def seminormed_group.of_mul_dist' [has_norm E] [group E] [pseudo_metric_space E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
seminormed_group E :=
{ dist_eq := λ x y, begin
rw h₁, apply le_antisymm,
{ simpa only [div_mul_cancel', one_mul] using h₂ (x/y) 1 y },
{ simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_right_inv y] using h₂ _ _ _ }
end }
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def seminormed_comm_group.of_mul_dist [has_norm E] [comm_group E] [pseudo_metric_space E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
seminormed_comm_group E :=
{ ..seminormed_group.of_mul_dist h₁ h₂ }
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def seminormed_comm_group.of_mul_dist' [has_norm E] [comm_group E] [pseudo_metric_space E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
seminormed_comm_group E :=
{ ..seminormed_group.of_mul_dist' h₁ h₂ }
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant distance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant distance."]
def normed_group.of_mul_dist [has_norm E] [group E] [metric_space E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
normed_group E :=
{ ..seminormed_group.of_mul_dist h₁ h₂ }
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def normed_group.of_mul_dist' [has_norm E] [group E] [metric_space E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
normed_group E :=
{ ..seminormed_group.of_mul_dist' h₁ h₂ }
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def normed_comm_group.of_mul_dist [has_norm E] [comm_group E] [metric_space E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
normed_comm_group E :=
{ ..normed_group.of_mul_dist h₁ h₂ }
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def normed_comm_group.of_mul_dist' [has_norm E] [comm_group E] [metric_space E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
normed_comm_group E :=
{ ..normed_group.of_mul_dist' h₁ h₂ }
set_option old_structure_cmd true
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance and the
pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this instance
creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing
`uniform_space` instance on `E`). -/
@[to_additive "Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance*
and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this
instance creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly
existing `uniform_space` instance on `E`)."]
def group_seminorm.to_seminormed_group [group E] (f : group_seminorm E) : seminormed_group E :=
{ dist := λ x y, f (x / y),
norm := f,
dist_eq := λ x y, rfl,
dist_self := λ x, by simp only [div_self', map_one_eq_zero],
dist_triangle := le_map_div_add_map_div f,
dist_comm := map_div_rev f }
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance and the
pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this instance
creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing
`uniform_space` instance on `E`). -/
@[to_additive "Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance*
and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this
instance creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly
existing `uniform_space` instance on `E`)."]
def group_seminorm.to_seminormed_comm_group [comm_group E] (f : group_seminorm E) :
seminormed_comm_group E :=
{ ..f.to_seminormed_group }
/-- Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric space
structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad definitional
equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `uniform_space` instance on
`E`). -/
@[to_additive "Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric
space structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad
definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `uniform_space`
instance on `E`)."]
def group_norm.to_normed_group [group E] (f : group_norm E) : normed_group E :=
{ eq_of_dist_eq_zero := λ x y h, div_eq_one.1 $ eq_one_of_map_eq_zero f h,
..f.to_group_seminorm.to_seminormed_group }
/-- Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric space
structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad definitional
equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `uniform_space` instance on
`E`). -/
@[to_additive "Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric
space structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad
definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `uniform_space`
instance on `E`)."]
def group_norm.to_normed_comm_group [comm_group E] (f : group_norm E) : normed_comm_group E :=
{ ..f.to_normed_group }
instance : normed_add_comm_group punit :=
{ norm := function.const _ 0,
dist_eq := λ _ _, rfl, }
@[simp] lemma punit.norm_eq_zero (r : punit) : ‖r‖ = 0 := rfl
section seminormed_group
variables [seminormed_group E] [seminormed_group F] [seminormed_group G] {s : set E}
{a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ : E} {r r₁ r₂ : ℝ}
@[to_additive]
lemma dist_eq_norm_div (a b : E) : dist a b = ‖a / b‖ := seminormed_group.dist_eq _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma dist_eq_norm_div' (a b : E) : dist a b = ‖b / a‖ := by rw [dist_comm, dist_eq_norm_div]
alias dist_eq_norm_sub ← dist_eq_norm
alias dist_eq_norm_sub' ← dist_eq_norm'
@[simp, to_additive] lemma dist_one_right (a : E) : dist a 1 = ‖a‖ :=
by rw [dist_eq_norm_div, div_one]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma dist_one_left : dist (1 : E) = norm :=
funext $ λ a, by rw [dist_comm, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive]
lemma isometry.norm_map_of_map_one {f : E → F} (hi : isometry f) (h₁ : f 1 = 1) (x : E) :
‖f x‖ = ‖x‖ :=
by rw [←dist_one_right, ←h₁, hi.dist_eq, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive tendsto_norm_cocompact_at_top]
lemma tendsto_norm_cocompact_at_top' [proper_space E] : tendsto norm (cocompact E) at_top :=
by simpa only [dist_one_right] using tendsto_dist_right_cocompact_at_top (1 : E)
@[to_additive] lemma norm_div_rev (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖ = ‖b / a‖ :=
by simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_comm a b
@[simp, to_additive norm_neg]
lemma norm_inv' (a : E) : ‖a⁻¹‖ = ‖a‖ := by simpa using norm_div_rev 1 a
@[simp, to_additive] lemma dist_mul_right (a₁ a₂ b : E) : dist (a₁ * b) (a₂ * b) = dist a₁ a₂ :=
by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma dist_mul_self_right (a b : E) : dist b (a * b) = ‖a‖ :=
by rw [←dist_one_left, ←dist_mul_right 1 a b, one_mul]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma dist_mul_self_left (a b : E) : dist (a * b) b = ‖a‖ :=
by rw [dist_comm, dist_mul_self_right]
@[to_additive] lemma dist_div_right (a₁ a₂ b : E) : dist (a₁ / b) (a₂ / b) = dist a₁ a₂ :=
by simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using dist_mul_right _ _ _
@[simp, to_additive] lemma dist_div_eq_dist_mul_left (a b c : E) :
dist (a / b) c = dist a (c * b) :=
by rw [←dist_mul_right _ _ b, div_mul_cancel']
@[simp, to_additive] lemma dist_div_eq_dist_mul_right (a b c : E) :
dist a (b / c) = dist (a * c) b :=
by rw [←dist_mul_right _ _ c, div_mul_cancel']
/-- In a (semi)normed group, inversion `x ↦ x⁻¹` tends to infinity at infinity. TODO: use
`bornology.cobounded` instead of `filter.comap has_norm.norm filter.at_top`. -/
@[to_additive "In a (semi)normed group, negation `x ↦ -x` tends to infinity at infinity. TODO: use
`bornology.cobounded` instead of `filter.comap has_norm.norm filter.at_top`."]
lemma filter.tendsto_inv_cobounded :
tendsto (has_inv.inv : E → E) (comap norm at_top) (comap norm at_top) :=
by simpa only [norm_inv', tendsto_comap_iff, (∘)] using tendsto_comap
/-- **Triangle inequality** for the norm. -/
@[to_additive norm_add_le "**Triangle inequality** for the norm."]
lemma norm_mul_le' (a b : E) : ‖a * b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ :=
by simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a 1 b⁻¹
@[to_additive] lemma norm_mul_le_of_le (h₁ : ‖a₁‖ ≤ r₁) (h₂ : ‖a₂‖ ≤ r₂) : ‖a₁ * a₂‖ ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(norm_mul_le' a₁ a₂).trans $ add_le_add h₁ h₂
@[to_additive norm_add₃_le] lemma norm_mul₃_le (a b c : E) : ‖a * b * c‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ + ‖c‖ :=
norm_mul_le_of_le (norm_mul_le' _ _) le_rfl
@[simp, to_additive norm_nonneg] lemma norm_nonneg' (a : E) : 0 ≤ ‖a‖ :=
by { rw [←dist_one_right], exact dist_nonneg }
section
open tactic tactic.positivity
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: norms are nonnegative. -/
@[positivity]
meta def _root_.tactic.positivity_norm : expr → tactic strictness
| `(‖%%a‖) := nonnegative <$> mk_app ``norm_nonneg [a] <|> nonnegative <$> mk_app ``norm_nonneg' [a]
| _ := failed
end
@[simp, to_additive norm_zero] lemma norm_one' : ‖(1 : E)‖ = 0 := by rw [←dist_one_right, dist_self]
@[to_additive] lemma ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero : ‖a‖ ≠ 0 → a ≠ 1 :=
mt $ by { rintro rfl, exact norm_one' }
@[nontriviality, to_additive norm_of_subsingleton]
lemma norm_of_subsingleton' [subsingleton E] (a : E) : ‖a‖ = 0 :=
by rw [subsingleton.elim a 1, norm_one']
attribute [nontriviality] norm_of_subsingleton
@[to_additive zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq]
lemma zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq' (x : E) : 0 < 1 + ‖x‖^2 := by positivity
@[to_additive] lemma norm_div_le (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ :=
by simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a 1 b
@[to_additive] lemma norm_div_le_of_le {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (H₁ : ‖a₁‖ ≤ r₁) (H₂ : ‖a₂‖ ≤ r₂) :
‖a₁ / a₂‖ ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(norm_div_le a₁ a₂).trans $ add_le_add H₁ H₂
@[to_additive] lemma dist_le_norm_mul_norm (a b : E) : dist a b ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ :=
by { rw dist_eq_norm_div, apply norm_div_le }
@[to_additive abs_norm_sub_norm_le] lemma abs_norm_sub_norm_le' (a b : E) : |‖a‖ - ‖b‖| ≤ ‖a / b‖ :=
by simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using abs_dist_sub_le a b 1
@[to_additive norm_sub_norm_le] lemma norm_sub_norm_le' (a b : E) : ‖a‖ - ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ :=
(le_abs_self _).trans (abs_norm_sub_norm_le' a b)
@[to_additive dist_norm_norm_le] lemma dist_norm_norm_le' (a b : E) : dist ‖a‖ ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ :=
abs_norm_sub_norm_le' a b
@[to_additive] lemma norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' (u v : E) : ‖u‖ ≤ ‖v‖ + ‖u / v‖ :=
by { rw add_comm, refine (norm_mul_le' _ _).trans_eq' _, rw div_mul_cancel' }
@[to_additive] lemma norm_le_norm_add_norm_div (u v : E) : ‖v‖ ≤ ‖u‖ + ‖u / v‖ :=
by { rw norm_div_rev, exact norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' v u }
alias norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub' ← norm_le_insert'
alias norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub ← norm_le_insert
@[to_additive] lemma norm_le_mul_norm_add (u v : E) : ‖u‖ ≤ ‖u * v‖ + ‖v‖ :=
calc ‖u‖ = ‖u * v / v‖ : by rw mul_div_cancel''
... ≤ ‖u * v‖ + ‖v‖ : norm_div_le _ _
@[to_additive ball_eq] lemma ball_eq' (y : E) (ε : ℝ) : ball y ε = {x | ‖x / y‖ < ε} :=
set.ext $ λ a, by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive] lemma ball_one_eq (r : ℝ) : ball (1 : E) r = {x | ‖x‖ < r} :=
set.ext $ assume a, by simp
@[to_additive mem_ball_iff_norm] lemma mem_ball_iff_norm'' : b ∈ ball a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ < r :=
by rw [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive mem_ball_iff_norm'] lemma mem_ball_iff_norm''' : b ∈ ball a r ↔ ‖a / b‖ < r :=
by rw [mem_ball', dist_eq_norm_div]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mem_ball_one_iff : a ∈ ball (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ < r :=
by rw [mem_ball, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive mem_closed_ball_iff_norm]
lemma mem_closed_ball_iff_norm'' : b ∈ closed_ball a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ ≤ r :=
by rw [mem_closed_ball, dist_eq_norm_div]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mem_closed_ball_one_iff : a ∈ closed_ball (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ ≤ r :=
by rw [mem_closed_ball, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive mem_closed_ball_iff_norm']
lemma mem_closed_ball_iff_norm''' : b ∈ closed_ball a r ↔ ‖a / b‖ ≤ r :=
by rw [mem_closed_ball', dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive norm_le_of_mem_closed_ball]
lemma norm_le_of_mem_closed_ball' (h : b ∈ closed_ball a r) : ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + r :=
(norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _).trans $ add_le_add_left (by rwa ←dist_eq_norm_div) _
@[to_additive norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le]
lemma norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le' : dist a b ≤ r → ‖a‖ ≤ ‖b‖ + r :=
norm_le_of_mem_closed_ball'
@[to_additive norm_lt_of_mem_ball]
lemma norm_lt_of_mem_ball' (h : b ∈ ball a r) : ‖b‖ < ‖a‖ + r :=
(norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _).trans_lt $ add_lt_add_left (by rwa ←dist_eq_norm_div) _
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_div_sub_norm_div_le_norm_div (u v w : E) : ‖u / w‖ - ‖v / w‖ ≤ ‖u / v‖ :=
by simpa only [div_div_div_cancel_right'] using norm_sub_norm_le' (u / w) (v / w)
@[to_additive bounded_iff_forall_norm_le]
lemma bounded_iff_forall_norm_le' : bounded s ↔ ∃ C, ∀ x ∈ s, ‖x‖ ≤ C :=
by simpa only [set.subset_def, mem_closed_ball_one_iff] using bounded_iff_subset_ball (1 : E)
alias bounded_iff_forall_norm_le' ↔ metric.bounded.exists_norm_le' _
alias bounded_iff_forall_norm_le ↔ metric.bounded.exists_norm_le _
attribute [to_additive metric.bounded.exists_norm_le] metric.bounded.exists_norm_le'
@[to_additive metric.bounded.exists_pos_norm_le]
lemma metric.bounded.exists_pos_norm_le' (hs : metric.bounded s) : ∃ R > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ‖x‖ ≤ R :=
let ⟨R₀, hR₀⟩ := hs.exists_norm_le' in
⟨max R₀ 1, by positivity, λ x hx, (hR₀ x hx).trans $ le_max_left _ _⟩
@[simp, to_additive mem_sphere_iff_norm]
lemma mem_sphere_iff_norm' : b ∈ sphere a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ = r := by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mem_sphere_one_iff_norm : a ∈ sphere (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ = r :=
by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
@[simp, to_additive norm_eq_of_mem_sphere]
lemma norm_eq_of_mem_sphere' (x : sphere (1:E) r) : ‖(x : E)‖ = r := mem_sphere_one_iff_norm.mp x.2
@[to_additive] lemma ne_one_of_mem_sphere (hr : r ≠ 0) (x : sphere (1 : E) r) : (x : E) ≠ 1 :=
ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero $ by rwa norm_eq_of_mem_sphere' x
@[to_additive ne_zero_of_mem_unit_sphere]
lemma ne_one_of_mem_unit_sphere (x : sphere (1 : E) 1) : (x:E) ≠ 1 :=
ne_one_of_mem_sphere one_ne_zero _
variables (E)
/-- The norm of a seminormed group as a group seminorm. -/
@[to_additive "The norm of a seminormed group as an additive group seminorm."]
def norm_group_seminorm : group_seminorm E := ⟨norm, norm_one', norm_mul_le', norm_inv'⟩
@[simp, to_additive] lemma coe_norm_group_seminorm : ⇑(norm_group_seminorm E) = norm := rfl
variables {E}
namespace isometric
-- TODO This material is superseded by similar constructions such as
-- `affine_isometry_equiv.const_vadd`; deduplicate
/-- Multiplication `y ↦ y * x` as an `isometry`. -/
@[to_additive "Addition `y ↦ y + x` as an `isometry`"]
protected def mul_right (x : E) : E ≃ᵢ E :=
{ isometry_to_fun := isometry.of_dist_eq $ λ y z, dist_mul_right _ _ _,
.. equiv.mul_right x }
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma mul_right_to_equiv (x : E) : (isometric.mul_right x).to_equiv = equiv.mul_right x := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma coe_mul_right (x : E) : (isometric.mul_right x : E → E) = λ y, y * x := rfl
@[to_additive] lemma mul_right_apply (x y : E) : (isometric.mul_right x : E → E) y = y * x := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma mul_right_symm (x : E) : (isometric.mul_right x).symm = isometric.mul_right x⁻¹ :=
ext $ λ y, rfl
end isometric
@[to_additive] lemma normed_comm_group.tendsto_nhds_one {f : α → E} {l : filter α} :
tendsto f l (𝓝 1) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖ f x ‖ < ε :=
metric.tendsto_nhds.trans $ by simp only [dist_one_right]
@[to_additive] lemma normed_comm_group.tendsto_nhds_nhds {f : E → F} {x : E} {y : F} :
tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x', ‖x' / x‖ < δ → ‖f x' / y‖ < ε :=
by simp_rw [metric.tendsto_nhds_nhds, dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive] lemma normed_comm_group.cauchy_seq_iff [nonempty α] [semilattice_sup α] {u : α → E} :
cauchy_seq u ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ m, N ≤ m → ∀ n, N ≤ n → ‖u m / u n‖ < ε :=
by simp [metric.cauchy_seq_iff, dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive] lemma normed_comm_group.nhds_basis_norm_lt (x : E) :
(𝓝 x).has_basis (λ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε) (λ ε, {y | ‖y / x‖ < ε}) :=
by { simp_rw ← ball_eq', exact metric.nhds_basis_ball }
@[to_additive] lemma normed_comm_group.nhds_one_basis_norm_lt :
(𝓝 (1 : E)).has_basis (λ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε) (λ ε, {y | ‖y‖ < ε}) :=
by { convert normed_comm_group.nhds_basis_norm_lt (1 : E), simp }
@[to_additive] lemma normed_comm_group.uniformity_basis_dist :
(𝓤 E).has_basis (λ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε) (λ ε, {p : E × E | ‖p.fst / p.snd‖ < ε}) :=
by { convert metric.uniformity_basis_dist, simp [dist_eq_norm_div] }
open finset
/-- A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is Lipschitz, if there exists a constant `C` such that
for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`. The analogous condition for a linear map of
(semi)normed spaces is in `normed_space.operator_norm`. -/
@[to_additive "A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is Lipschitz, if there exists a constant `C`
such that for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`. The analogous condition for a linear map of
(semi)normed spaces is in `normed_space.operator_norm`."]
lemma monoid_hom_class.lipschitz_of_bound [monoid_hom_class 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (C : ℝ)
(h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) : lipschitz_with (real.to_nnreal C) f :=
lipschitz_with.of_dist_le' $ λ x y, by simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div, map_div] using h (x / y)
@[to_additive] lemma lipschitz_on_with_iff_norm_div_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} :
lipschitz_on_with C f s ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ‖f x / f y‖ ≤ C * ‖x / y‖ :=
by simp only [lipschitz_on_with_iff_dist_le_mul, dist_eq_norm_div]
alias lipschitz_on_with_iff_norm_div_le ↔ lipschitz_on_with.norm_div_le _
attribute [to_additive] lipschitz_on_with.norm_div_le
@[to_additive] lemma lipschitz_on_with.norm_div_le_of_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0}
(h : lipschitz_on_with C f s) (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) (hr : ‖a / b‖ ≤ r) :
‖f a / f b‖ ≤ C * r :=
(h.norm_div_le ha hb).trans $ mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hr C.2
@[to_additive] lemma lipschitz_with_iff_norm_div_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} :
lipschitz_with C f ↔ ∀ x y, ‖f x / f y‖ ≤ C * ‖x / y‖ :=
by simp only [lipschitz_with_iff_dist_le_mul, dist_eq_norm_div]
alias lipschitz_with_iff_norm_div_le ↔ lipschitz_with.norm_div_le _
attribute [to_additive] lipschitz_with.norm_div_le
@[to_additive] lemma lipschitz_with.norm_div_le_of_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} (h : lipschitz_with C f)
(hr : ‖a / b‖ ≤ r) : ‖f a / f b‖ ≤ C * r :=
(h.norm_div_le _ _).trans $ mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hr C.2
/-- A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is continuous, if there exists a constant `C` such that
for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`. -/
@[to_additive "A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is continuous, if there exists a constant `C`
such that for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`"]
lemma monoid_hom_class.continuous_of_bound [monoid_hom_class 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (C : ℝ)
(h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) : continuous f :=
(monoid_hom_class.lipschitz_of_bound f C h).continuous
@[to_additive] lemma monoid_hom_class.uniform_continuous_of_bound [monoid_hom_class 𝓕 E F]
(f : 𝓕) (C : ℝ) (h : ∀x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) : uniform_continuous f :=
(monoid_hom_class.lipschitz_of_bound f C h).uniform_continuous
@[to_additive is_compact.exists_bound_of_continuous_on]
lemma is_compact.exists_bound_of_continuous_on' [topological_space α] {s : set α}
(hs : is_compact s) {f : α → E} (hf : continuous_on f s) :
∃ C, ∀ x ∈ s, ‖f x‖ ≤ C :=
(bounded_iff_forall_norm_le'.1 (hs.image_of_continuous_on hf).bounded).imp $ λ C hC x hx,
hC _ $ set.mem_image_of_mem _ hx
@[to_additive] lemma monoid_hom_class.isometry_iff_norm [monoid_hom_class 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) :
isometry f ↔ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ = ‖x‖ :=
begin
simp only [isometry_iff_dist_eq, dist_eq_norm_div, ←map_div],
refine ⟨λ h x, _, λ h x y, h _⟩,
simpa using h x 1,
end
alias monoid_hom_class.isometry_iff_norm ↔ _ monoid_hom_class.isometry_of_norm
attribute [to_additive] monoid_hom_class.isometry_of_norm
section nnnorm
@[priority 100, to_additive] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance seminormed_group.to_has_nnnorm : has_nnnorm E := ⟨λ a, ⟨‖a‖, norm_nonneg' a⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast, to_additive coe_nnnorm] lemma coe_nnnorm' (a : E) : (‖a‖₊ : ℝ) = ‖a‖ := rfl
@[simp, to_additive coe_comp_nnnorm]
lemma coe_comp_nnnorm' : (coe : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) ∘ (nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0) = norm := rfl
@[to_additive norm_to_nnreal]
lemma norm_to_nnreal' : ‖a‖.to_nnreal = ‖a‖₊ := @real.to_nnreal_coe ‖a‖₊
@[to_additive]
lemma nndist_eq_nnnorm_div (a b : E) : nndist a b = ‖a / b‖₊ := nnreal.eq $ dist_eq_norm_div _ _
alias nndist_eq_nnnorm_sub ← nndist_eq_nnnorm
@[simp, to_additive nnnorm_zero] lemma nnnorm_one' : ‖(1 : E)‖₊ = 0 := nnreal.eq norm_one'
@[to_additive] lemma ne_one_of_nnnorm_ne_zero {a : E} : ‖a‖₊ ≠ 0 → a ≠ 1 :=
mt $ by { rintro rfl, exact nnnorm_one' }
@[to_additive nnnorm_add_le]
lemma nnnorm_mul_le' (a b : E) : ‖a * b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ := nnreal.coe_le_coe.1 $ norm_mul_le' a b
@[simp, to_additive nnnorm_neg] lemma nnnorm_inv' (a : E) : ‖a⁻¹‖₊ = ‖a‖₊ := nnreal.eq $ norm_inv' a
@[to_additive] lemma nnnorm_div_le (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ :=
nnreal.coe_le_coe.1 $ norm_div_le _ _
@[to_additive nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le]
lemma nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le' (a b : E) : nndist ‖a‖₊ ‖b‖₊ ≤ ‖a / b‖₊ :=
nnreal.coe_le_coe.1 $ dist_norm_norm_le' a b
@[to_additive] lemma nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div (a b : E) : ‖b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖a / b‖₊ :=
norm_le_norm_add_norm_div _ _
@[to_additive] lemma nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div' (a b : E) : ‖a‖₊ ≤ ‖b‖₊ + ‖a / b‖₊ :=
norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _
alias nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub' ← nnnorm_le_insert'
alias nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub ← nnnorm_le_insert
@[to_additive]
lemma nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_add (a b : E) : ‖a‖₊ ≤ ‖a * b‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ := norm_le_mul_norm_add _ _
@[to_additive of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
lemma of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm' (a : E) : ennreal.of_real ‖a‖ = ‖a‖₊ :=
ennreal.of_real_eq_coe_nnreal _
@[to_additive] lemma edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_div (a b : E) : edist a b = ‖a / b‖₊ :=
by rw [edist_dist, dist_eq_norm_div, of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm']
@[to_additive edist_eq_coe_nnnorm] lemma edist_eq_coe_nnnorm' (x : E) : edist x 1 = (‖x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) :=
by rw [edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_div, div_one]
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_emetric_ball_one_iff {r : ℝ≥0∞} : a ∈ emetric.ball (1 : E) r ↔ ↑‖a‖₊ < r :=
by rw [emetric.mem_ball, edist_eq_coe_nnnorm']
@[simp, to_additive] lemma edist_mul_right (a₁ a₂ b : E) : edist (a₁ * b) (a₂ * b) = edist a₁ a₂ :=
by simp [edist_dist]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma edist_div_right (a₁ a₂ b : E) : edist (a₁ / b) (a₂ / b) = edist a₁ a₂ :=
by simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using edist_mul_right _ _ _
@[to_additive] lemma monoid_hom_class.lipschitz_of_bound_nnnorm [monoid_hom_class 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕)
(C : ℝ≥0) (h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C * ‖x‖₊) : lipschitz_with C f :=
@real.to_nnreal_coe C ▸ monoid_hom_class.lipschitz_of_bound f C h
@[to_additive] lemma monoid_hom_class.antilipschitz_of_bound [monoid_hom_class 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕)
{K : ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ x, ‖x‖ ≤ K * ‖f x‖) :
antilipschitz_with K f :=
antilipschitz_with.of_le_mul_dist $ λ x y, by simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div, map_div] using h (x / y)
@[to_additive] lemma monoid_hom_class.bound_of_antilipschitz [monoid_hom_class 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕)
{K : ℝ≥0} (h : antilipschitz_with K f) (x) : ‖x‖ ≤ K * ‖f x‖ :=
by simpa only [dist_one_right, map_one] using h.le_mul_dist x 1
end nnnorm
@[to_additive] lemma tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_one {f : α → E} {a : filter α} {b : E} :
tendsto f a (𝓝 b) ↔ tendsto (λ e, ‖f e / b‖) a (𝓝 0) :=
by { convert tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero, simp [dist_eq_norm_div] }
@[to_additive] lemma tendsto_one_iff_norm_tendsto_one {f : α → E} {a : filter α} :
tendsto f a (𝓝 1) ↔ tendsto (λ e, ‖f e‖) a (𝓝 0) :=
by { rw tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_one, simp only [div_one] }
@[to_additive] lemma comap_norm_nhds_one : comap norm (𝓝 0) = 𝓝 (1 : E) :=
by simpa only [dist_one_right] using nhds_comap_dist (1 : E)
/-- Special case of the sandwich theorem: if the norm of `f` is eventually bounded by a real
function `a` which tends to `0`, then `f` tends to `1`. In this pair of lemmas (`squeeze_one_norm'`
and `squeeze_one_norm`), following a convention of similar lemmas in `topology.metric_space.basic`
and `topology.algebra.order`, the `'` version is phrased using "eventually" and the non-`'` version
is phrased absolutely. -/
@[to_additive "Special case of the sandwich theorem: if the norm of `f` is eventually bounded by a
real function `a` which tends to `0`, then `f` tends to `1`. In this pair of lemmas
(`squeeze_zero_norm'` and `squeeze_zero_norm`), following a convention of similar lemmas in
`topology.metric_space.basic` and `topology.algebra.order`, the `'` version is phrased using
\"eventually\" and the non-`'` version is phrased absolutely."]
lemma squeeze_one_norm' {f : α → E} {a : α → ℝ} {t₀ : filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ n in t₀, ‖f n‖ ≤ a n)
(h' : tendsto a t₀ (𝓝 0)) : tendsto f t₀ (𝓝 1) :=
tendsto_one_iff_norm_tendsto_one.2 $ squeeze_zero' (eventually_of_forall $ λ n, norm_nonneg' _) h h'
/-- Special case of the sandwich theorem: if the norm of `f` is bounded by a real function `a` which
tends to `0`, then `f` tends to `1`. -/
@[to_additive "Special case of the sandwich theorem: if the norm of `f` is bounded by a real
function `a` which tends to `0`, then `f` tends to `0`."]
lemma squeeze_one_norm {f : α → E} {a : α → ℝ} {t₀ : filter α} (h : ∀ n, ‖f n‖ ≤ a n) :
tendsto a t₀ (𝓝 0) → tendsto f t₀ (𝓝 1) :=
squeeze_one_norm' $ eventually_of_forall h
@[to_additive] lemma tendsto_norm_div_self (x : E) : tendsto (λ a, ‖a / x‖) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 0) :=
by simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using
tendsto_id.dist (tendsto_const_nhds : tendsto (λ a, (x:E)) (𝓝 x) _)
@[to_additive tendsto_norm]lemma tendsto_norm' {x : E} : tendsto (λ a, ‖a‖) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 ‖x‖) :=
by simpa using tendsto_id.dist (tendsto_const_nhds : tendsto (λ a, (1:E)) _ _)
@[to_additive] lemma tendsto_norm_one : tendsto (λ a : E, ‖a‖) (𝓝 1) (𝓝 0) :=
by simpa using tendsto_norm_div_self (1:E)
@[continuity, to_additive continuous_norm] lemma continuous_norm' : continuous (λ a : E, ‖a‖) :=
by simpa using continuous_id.dist (continuous_const : continuous (λ a, (1:E)))
@[continuity, to_additive continuous_nnnorm]
lemma continuous_nnnorm' : continuous (λ a : E, ‖a‖₊) := continuous_norm'.subtype_mk _
@[to_additive lipschitz_with_one_norm] lemma lipschitz_with_one_norm' :
lipschitz_with 1 (norm : E → ℝ) :=
by simpa only [dist_one_left] using lipschitz_with.dist_right (1 : E)
@[to_additive lipschitz_with_one_nnnorm] lemma lipschitz_with_one_nnnorm' :
lipschitz_with 1 (has_nnnorm.nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0) :=
lipschitz_with_one_norm'
@[to_additive uniform_continuous_norm]
lemma uniform_continuous_norm' : uniform_continuous (norm : E → ℝ) :=
lipschitz_with_one_norm'.uniform_continuous
@[to_additive uniform_continuous_nnnorm]
lemma uniform_continuous_nnnorm' : uniform_continuous (λ (a : E), ‖a‖₊) :=
uniform_continuous_norm'.subtype_mk _
@[to_additive] lemma mem_closure_one_iff_norm {x : E} : x ∈ closure ({1} : set E) ↔ ‖x‖ = 0 :=
by rw [←closed_ball_zero', mem_closed_ball_one_iff, (norm_nonneg' x).le_iff_eq]
@[to_additive] lemma closure_one_eq : closure ({1} : set E) = {x | ‖x‖ = 0} :=
set.ext (λ x, mem_closure_one_iff_norm)
/-- A helper lemma used to prove that the (scalar or usual) product of a function that tends to one
and a bounded function tends to one. This lemma is formulated for any binary operation
`op : E → F → G` with an estimate `‖op x y‖ ≤ A * ‖x‖ * ‖y‖` for some constant A instead of
multiplication so that it can be applied to `(*)`, `flip (*)`, `(•)`, and `flip (•)`. -/
@[to_additive "A helper lemma used to prove that the (scalar or usual) product of a function that
tends to zero and a bounded function tends to zero. This lemma is formulated for any binary
operation `op : E → F → G` with an estimate `‖op x y‖ ≤ A * ‖x‖ * ‖y‖` for some constant A instead
of multiplication so that it can be applied to `(*)`, `flip (*)`, `(•)`, and `flip (•)`."]
lemma filter.tendsto.op_one_is_bounded_under_le' {f : α → E} {g : α → F} {l : filter α}
(hf : tendsto f l (𝓝 1)) (hg : is_bounded_under (≤) l (norm ∘ g)) (op : E → F → G)
(h_op : ∃ A, ∀ x y, ‖op x y‖ ≤ A * ‖x‖ * ‖y‖) :
tendsto (λ x, op (f x) (g x)) l (𝓝 1) :=
begin
cases h_op with A h_op,
rcases hg with ⟨C, hC⟩, rw eventually_map at hC,
rw normed_comm_group.tendsto_nhds_one at hf ⊢,
intros ε ε₀,
rcases exists_pos_mul_lt ε₀ (A * C) with ⟨δ, δ₀, hδ⟩,
filter_upwards [hf δ δ₀, hC] with i hf hg,
refine (h_op _ _).trans_lt _,
cases le_total A 0 with hA hA,
{ exact (mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg (mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg hA $ norm_nonneg' _) $
norm_nonneg' _).trans_lt ε₀ },
calc A * ‖f i‖ * ‖g i‖ ≤ A * δ * C :
mul_le_mul (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hf.le hA) hg (norm_nonneg' _) (mul_nonneg hA δ₀.le)
... = A * C * δ : mul_right_comm _ _ _
... < ε : hδ,
end
/-- A helper lemma used to prove that the (scalar or usual) product of a function that tends to one
and a bounded function tends to one. This lemma is formulated for any binary operation
`op : E → F → G` with an estimate `‖op x y‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖` instead of multiplication so that it
can be applied to `(*)`, `flip (*)`, `(•)`, and `flip (•)`. -/
@[to_additive "A helper lemma used to prove that the (scalar or usual) product of a function that
tends to zero and a bounded function tends to zero. This lemma is formulated for any binary
operation `op : E → F → G` with an estimate `‖op x y‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖` instead of multiplication so that
it can be applied to `(*)`, `flip (*)`, `(•)`, and `flip (•)`."]
lemma filter.tendsto.op_one_is_bounded_under_le {f : α → E} {g : α → F} {l : filter α}
(hf : tendsto f l (𝓝 1)) (hg : is_bounded_under (≤) l (norm ∘ g)) (op : E → F → G)
(h_op : ∀ x y, ‖op x y‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖) :
tendsto (λ x, op (f x) (g x)) l (𝓝 1) :=
hf.op_one_is_bounded_under_le' hg op ⟨1, λ x y, (one_mul (‖x‖)).symm ▸ h_op x y⟩
section
variables {l : filter α} {f : α → E}
@[to_additive filter.tendsto.norm] lemma filter.tendsto.norm' (h : tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) :
tendsto (λ x, ‖f x‖) l (𝓝 ‖a‖) :=
tendsto_norm'.comp h
@[to_additive filter.tendsto.nnnorm] lemma filter.tendsto.nnnorm' (h : tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) :
tendsto (λ x, ‖f x‖₊) l (𝓝 (‖a‖₊)) :=
tendsto.comp continuous_nnnorm'.continuous_at h
end
section
variables [topological_space α] {f : α → E}
@[to_additive continuous.norm] lemma continuous.norm' : continuous f → continuous (λ x, ‖f x‖) :=
continuous_norm'.comp
@[to_additive continuous.nnnorm]
lemma continuous.nnnorm' : continuous f → continuous (λ x, ‖f x‖₊) := continuous_nnnorm'.comp
@[to_additive continuous_at.norm]
lemma continuous_at.norm' {a : α} (h : continuous_at f a) : continuous_at (λ x, ‖f x‖) a := h.norm'
@[to_additive continuous_at.nnnorm]
lemma continuous_at.nnnorm' {a : α} (h : continuous_at f a) : continuous_at (λ x, ‖f x‖₊) a :=
h.nnnorm'
@[to_additive continuous_within_at.norm]
lemma continuous_within_at.norm' {s : set α} {a : α} (h : continuous_within_at f s a) :
continuous_within_at (λ x, ‖f x‖) s a :=
h.norm'
@[to_additive continuous_within_at.nnnorm]
lemma continuous_within_at.nnnorm' {s : set α} {a : α} (h : continuous_within_at f s a) :
continuous_within_at (λ x, ‖f x‖₊) s a :=
h.nnnorm'
@[to_additive continuous_on.norm]
lemma continuous_on.norm' {s : set α} (h : continuous_on f s) : continuous_on (λ x, ‖f x‖) s :=
λ x hx, (h x hx).norm'
@[to_additive continuous_on.nnnorm]
lemma continuous_on.nnnorm' {s : set α} (h : continuous_on f s) : continuous_on (λ x, ‖f x‖₊) s :=
λ x hx, (h x hx).nnnorm'
end
/-- If `‖y‖ → ∞`, then we can assume `y ≠ x` for any fixed `x`. -/
@[to_additive eventually_ne_of_tendsto_norm_at_top "If `‖y‖→∞`, then we can assume `y≠x` for any
fixed `x`"]
lemma eventually_ne_of_tendsto_norm_at_top' {l : filter α} {f : α → E}
(h : tendsto (λ y, ‖f y‖) l at_top) (x : E) :
∀ᶠ y in l, f y ≠ x :=
(h.eventually_ne_at_top _).mono $ λ x, ne_of_apply_ne norm
@[to_additive] lemma seminormed_comm_group.mem_closure_iff :
a ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ∃ b ∈ s, ‖a / b‖ < ε :=
by simp [metric.mem_closure_iff, dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive norm_le_zero_iff'] lemma norm_le_zero_iff''' [t0_space E] {a : E} : ‖a‖ ≤ 0 ↔ a = 1 :=
begin
letI : normed_group E :=
{ to_metric_space := metric.of_t0_pseudo_metric_space E, ..‹seminormed_group E› },
rw [←dist_one_right, dist_le_zero],
end
@[to_additive norm_eq_zero'] lemma norm_eq_zero''' [t0_space E] {a : E} : ‖a‖ = 0 ↔ a = 1 :=
(norm_nonneg' a).le_iff_eq.symm.trans norm_le_zero_iff'''
@[to_additive norm_pos_iff'] lemma norm_pos_iff''' [t0_space E] {a : E} : 0 < ‖a‖ ↔ a ≠ 1 :=
by rw [← not_le, norm_le_zero_iff''']
@[to_additive]
lemma seminormed_group.tendsto_uniformly_on_one {f : ι → κ → G} {s : set κ} {l : filter ι} :
tendsto_uniformly_on f 1 l s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ i in l, ∀ x ∈ s, ‖f i x‖ < ε :=
by simp_rw [tendsto_uniformly_on_iff, pi.one_apply, dist_one_left]
@[to_additive]
lemma seminormed_group.uniform_cauchy_seq_on_filter_iff_tendsto_uniformly_on_filter_one
{f : ι → κ → G} {l : filter ι} {l' : filter κ} : uniform_cauchy_seq_on_filter f l l' ↔
tendsto_uniformly_on_filter (λ n : ι × ι, λ z, f n.fst z / f n.snd z) 1 (l ×ᶠ l) l' :=
begin
refine ⟨λ hf u hu, _, λ hf u hu, _⟩,
{ obtain ⟨ε, hε, H⟩ := uniformity_basis_dist.mem_uniformity_iff.mp hu,
refine (hf {p : G × G | dist p.fst p.snd < ε} $ dist_mem_uniformity hε).mono (λ x hx,
H 1 (f x.fst.fst x.snd / f x.fst.snd x.snd) _),
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div, norm_div_rev] using hx },
{ obtain ⟨ε, hε, H⟩ := uniformity_basis_dist.mem_uniformity_iff.mp hu,
refine (hf {p : G × G | dist p.fst p.snd < ε} $ dist_mem_uniformity hε).mono (λ x hx,
H (f x.fst.fst x.snd) (f x.fst.snd x.snd) _),
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div, norm_div_rev] using hx }
end
@[to_additive]
lemma seminormed_group.uniform_cauchy_seq_on_iff_tendsto_uniformly_on_one
{f : ι → κ → G} {s : set κ} {l : filter ι} :
uniform_cauchy_seq_on f l s ↔
tendsto_uniformly_on (λ n : ι × ι, λ z, f n.fst z / f n.snd z) 1 (l ×ᶠ l) s :=
by rw [tendsto_uniformly_on_iff_tendsto_uniformly_on_filter,
uniform_cauchy_seq_on_iff_uniform_cauchy_seq_on_filter,
seminormed_group.uniform_cauchy_seq_on_filter_iff_tendsto_uniformly_on_filter_one]
end seminormed_group
section induced
variables (E F)
/-- A group homomorphism from a `group` to a `seminormed_group` induces a `seminormed_group`
structure on the domain. -/
@[reducible, -- See note [reducible non-instances]
to_additive "A group homomorphism from an `add_group` to a `seminormed_add_group` induces a
`seminormed_add_group` structure on the domain."]
def seminormed_group.induced [group E] [seminormed_group F] [monoid_hom_class 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) :
seminormed_group E :=
{ norm := λ x, ‖f x‖,
dist_eq := λ x y, by simpa only [map_div, ←dist_eq_norm_div],
..pseudo_metric_space.induced f _ }
/-- A group homomorphism from a `comm_group` to a `seminormed_group` induces a
`seminormed_comm_group` structure on the domain. -/
@[reducible, -- See note [reducible non-instances]
to_additive "A group homomorphism from an `add_comm_group` to a `seminormed_add_group` induces a
`seminormed_add_comm_group` structure on the domain."]
def seminormed_comm_group.induced [comm_group E] [seminormed_group F] [monoid_hom_class 𝓕 E F]
(f : 𝓕) : seminormed_comm_group E :=
{ ..seminormed_group.induced E F f }
/-- An injective group homomorphism from a `group` to a `normed_group` induces a `normed_group`
structure on the domain. -/
@[reducible, -- See note [reducible non-instances].
to_additive "An injective group homomorphism from an `add_group` to a `normed_add_group` induces a
`normed_add_group` structure on the domain."]
def normed_group.induced [group E] [normed_group F] [monoid_hom_class 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕)
(h : injective f) : normed_group E :=
{ ..seminormed_group.induced E F f, ..metric_space.induced f h _ }
/-- An injective group homomorphism from an `comm_group` to a `normed_group` induces a
`normed_comm_group` structure on the domain. -/
@[reducible, -- See note [reducible non-instances].
to_additive "An injective group homomorphism from an `comm_group` to a `normed_comm_group` induces a
`normed_comm_group` structure on the domain."]
def normed_comm_group.induced [comm_group E] [normed_group F] [monoid_hom_class 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕)
(h : injective f) : normed_comm_group E :=
{ ..seminormed_group.induced E F f, ..metric_space.induced f h _ }
end induced
section seminormed_comm_group
variables [seminormed_comm_group E] [seminormed_comm_group F] {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ : E} {r r₁ r₂ : ℝ}
@[simp, to_additive] lemma dist_mul_left (a b₁ b₂ : E) : dist (a * b₁) (a * b₂) = dist b₁ b₂ :=
by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive] lemma dist_inv (x y : E) : dist x⁻¹ y = dist x y⁻¹ :=
by simp_rw [dist_eq_norm_div, ←norm_inv' (x⁻¹ / y), inv_div, div_inv_eq_mul, mul_comm]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma dist_inv_inv (a b : E) : dist a⁻¹ b⁻¹ = dist a b :=
by rw [dist_inv, inv_inv]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma dist_div_left (a b₁ b₂ : E) : dist (a / b₁) (a / b₂) = dist b₁ b₂ :=
by simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, dist_mul_left, dist_inv_inv]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma dist_self_mul_right (a b : E) : dist a (a * b) = ‖b‖ :=
by rw [←dist_one_left, ←dist_mul_left a 1 b, mul_one]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma dist_self_mul_left (a b : E) : dist (a * b) a = ‖b‖ :=
by rw [dist_comm, dist_self_mul_right]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma dist_self_div_right (a b : E) : dist a (a / b) = ‖b‖ :=
by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, dist_self_mul_right, norm_inv']
@[simp, to_additive] lemma dist_self_div_left (a b : E) : dist (a / b) a = ‖b‖ :=
by rw [dist_comm, dist_self_div_right]
@[to_additive] lemma dist_mul_mul_le (a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : E) :
dist (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) ≤ dist a₁ b₁ + dist a₂ b₂ :=
by simpa only [dist_mul_left, dist_mul_right] using dist_triangle (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂)
@[to_additive] lemma dist_mul_mul_le_of_le (h₁ : dist a₁ b₁ ≤ r₁) (h₂ : dist a₂ b₂ ≤ r₂) :
dist (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(dist_mul_mul_le a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂).trans $ add_le_add h₁ h₂
@[to_additive] lemma dist_div_div_le (a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : E) :
dist (a₁ / a₂) (b₁ / b₂) ≤ dist a₁ b₁ + dist a₂ b₂ :=
by simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, dist_inv_inv] using dist_mul_mul_le a₁ a₂⁻¹ b₁ b₂⁻¹
@[to_additive] lemma dist_div_div_le_of_le (h₁ : dist a₁ b₁ ≤ r₁) (h₂ : dist a₂ b₂ ≤ r₂) :
dist (a₁ / a₂) (b₁ / b₂) ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(dist_div_div_le a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂).trans $ add_le_add h₁ h₂
@[to_additive] lemma abs_dist_sub_le_dist_mul_mul (a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : E) :
|dist a₁ b₁ - dist a₂ b₂| ≤ dist (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) :=
by simpa only [dist_mul_left, dist_mul_right, dist_comm b₂]
using abs_dist_sub_le (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) (b₁ * a₂)
lemma norm_multiset_sum_le {E} [seminormed_add_comm_group E] (m : multiset E) :
‖m.sum‖ ≤ (m.map (λ x, ‖x‖)).sum :=
m.le_sum_of_subadditive norm norm_zero norm_add_le
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_multiset_prod_le (m : multiset E) : ‖m.prod‖ ≤ (m.map $ λ x, ‖x‖).sum :=
begin
rw [←multiplicative.of_add_le, of_add_multiset_prod, multiset.map_map],
refine multiset.le_prod_of_submultiplicative (multiplicative.of_add ∘ norm) _ (λ x y, _) _,
{ simp only [comp_app, norm_one', of_add_zero] },
{ exact norm_mul_le' _ _ }
end
lemma norm_sum_le {E} [seminormed_add_comm_group E] (s : finset ι) (f : ι → E) :
‖∑ i in s, f i‖ ≤ ∑ i in s, ‖f i‖ :=
s.le_sum_of_subadditive norm norm_zero norm_add_le f
@[to_additive] lemma norm_prod_le (s : finset ι) (f : ι → E) : ‖∏ i in s, f i‖ ≤ ∑ i in s, ‖f i‖ :=
begin
rw [←multiplicative.of_add_le, of_add_sum],
refine finset.le_prod_of_submultiplicative (multiplicative.of_add ∘ norm) _ (λ x y, _) _ _,
{ simp only [comp_app, norm_one', of_add_zero] },
{ exact norm_mul_le' _ _ }
end
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_prod_le_of_le (s : finset ι) {f : ι → E} {n : ι → ℝ} (h : ∀ b ∈ s, ‖f b‖ ≤ n b) :
‖∏ b in s, f b‖ ≤ ∑ b in s, n b :=
(norm_prod_le s f).trans $ finset.sum_le_sum h
@[to_additive] lemma dist_prod_prod_le_of_le (s : finset ι) {f a : ι → E} {d : ι → ℝ}
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, dist (f b) (a b) ≤ d b) :
dist (∏ b in s, f b) (∏ b in s, a b) ≤ ∑ b in s, d b :=
by { simp only [dist_eq_norm_div, ← finset.prod_div_distrib] at *, exact norm_prod_le_of_le s h }
@[to_additive] lemma dist_prod_prod_le (s : finset ι) (f a : ι → E) :
dist (∏ b in s, f b) (∏ b in s, a b) ≤ ∑ b in s, dist (f b) (a b) :=
dist_prod_prod_le_of_le s $ λ _ _, le_rfl
@[to_additive] lemma mul_mem_ball_iff_norm : a * b ∈ ball a r ↔ ‖b‖ < r :=
by rw [mem_ball_iff_norm'', mul_div_cancel''']
@[to_additive] lemma mul_mem_closed_ball_iff_norm : a * b ∈ closed_ball a r ↔ ‖b‖ ≤ r :=
by rw [mem_closed_ball_iff_norm'', mul_div_cancel''']
@[simp, to_additive] lemma preimage_mul_ball (a b : E) (r : ℝ) :
((*) b) ⁻¹' ball a r = ball (a / b) r :=
by { ext c, simp only [dist_eq_norm_div, set.mem_preimage, mem_ball, div_div_eq_mul_div, mul_comm] }
@[simp, to_additive] lemma preimage_mul_closed_ball (a b : E) (r : ℝ) :
((*) b) ⁻¹' (closed_ball a r) = closed_ball (a / b) r :=
by { ext c,
simp only [dist_eq_norm_div, set.mem_preimage, mem_closed_ball, div_div_eq_mul_div, mul_comm] }
@[simp, to_additive] lemma preimage_mul_sphere (a b : E) (r : ℝ) :
((*) b) ⁻¹' sphere a r = sphere (a / b) r :=
by { ext c, simp only [set.mem_preimage, mem_sphere_iff_norm', div_div_eq_mul_div, mul_comm] }
@[to_additive norm_nsmul_le] lemma norm_pow_le_mul_norm (n : ℕ) (a : E) : ‖a^n‖ ≤ n * ‖a‖ :=
begin
induction n with n ih, { simp, },
simpa only [pow_succ', nat.cast_succ, add_mul, one_mul] using norm_mul_le_of_le ih le_rfl,
end
@[to_additive nnnorm_nsmul_le] lemma nnnorm_pow_le_mul_norm (n : ℕ) (a : E) : ‖a^n‖₊ ≤ n * ‖a‖₊ :=
by simpa only [← nnreal.coe_le_coe, nnreal.coe_mul, nnreal.coe_nat_cast]
using norm_pow_le_mul_norm n a
@[to_additive] lemma pow_mem_closed_ball {n : ℕ} (h : a ∈ closed_ball b r) :
a^n ∈ closed_ball (b^n) (n • r) :=
begin
simp only [mem_closed_ball, dist_eq_norm_div, ← div_pow] at h ⊢,
refine (norm_pow_le_mul_norm n (a / b)).trans _,
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left h n.cast_nonneg,
end
@[to_additive] lemma pow_mem_ball {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (h : a ∈ ball b r) :
a^n ∈ ball (b^n) (n • r) :=
begin
simp only [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm_div, ← div_pow] at h ⊢,
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (norm_pow_le_mul_norm n (a / b)) _,
replace hn : 0 < (n : ℝ), { norm_cast, assumption, },
rw nsmul_eq_mul,
nlinarith,
end
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mul_mem_closed_ball_mul_iff {c : E} :
a * c ∈ closed_ball (b * c) r ↔ a ∈ closed_ball b r :=
by simp only [mem_closed_ball, dist_eq_norm_div, mul_div_mul_right_eq_div]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mul_mem_ball_mul_iff {c : E} :
a * c ∈ ball (b * c) r ↔ a ∈ ball b r :=
by simp only [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm_div, mul_div_mul_right_eq_div]
@[to_additive] lemma smul_closed_ball'' :
a • closed_ball b r = closed_ball (a • b) r :=
by { ext, simp [mem_closed_ball, set.mem_smul_set, dist_eq_norm_div, div_eq_inv_mul,
← eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq, mul_assoc], }
@[to_additive] lemma smul_ball'' :
a • ball b r = ball (a • b) r :=
by { ext, simp [mem_ball, set.mem_smul_set, dist_eq_norm_div, div_eq_inv_mul,
← eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq, mul_assoc], }
namespace isometric
/-- Multiplication `y ↦ x * y` as an `isometry`. -/
@[to_additive "Addition `y ↦ x + y` as an `isometry`"]
protected def mul_left (x : E) : E ≃ᵢ E :=
{ isometry_to_fun := isometry.of_dist_eq $ λ y z, dist_mul_left _ _ _,
to_equiv := equiv.mul_left x }
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mul_left_to_equiv (x : E) :
(isometric.mul_left x).to_equiv = equiv.mul_left x := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma coe_mul_left (x : E) : ⇑(isometric.mul_left x) = (*) x := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mul_left_symm (x : E) :
(isometric.mul_left x).symm = isometric.mul_left x⁻¹ :=
ext $ λ y, rfl
variables (E)
/-- Inversion `x ↦ x⁻¹` as an `isometry`. -/
@[to_additive "Negation `x ↦ -x` as an `isometry`."] protected def inv : E ≃ᵢ E :=
{ isometry_to_fun := isometry.of_dist_eq $ λ x y, dist_inv_inv _ _,
to_equiv := equiv.inv E }
variables {E}
@[simp, to_additive] lemma inv_symm : (isometric.inv E).symm = isometric.inv E := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma inv_to_equiv : (isometric.inv E).to_equiv = equiv.inv E := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma coe_inv : ⇑(isometric.inv E) = has_inv.inv := rfl
end isometric
open finset
@[to_additive] lemma controlled_prod_of_mem_closure {s : subgroup E} (hg : a ∈ closure (s : set E))
{b : ℕ → ℝ} (b_pos : ∀ n, 0 < b n) :
∃ v : ℕ → E,
tendsto (λ n, ∏ i in range (n+1), v i) at_top (𝓝 a) ∧
(∀ n, v n ∈ s) ∧
‖v 0 / a‖ < b 0 ∧
∀ n, 0 < n → ‖v n‖ < b n :=
begin
obtain ⟨u : ℕ → E, u_in : ∀ n, u n ∈ s, lim_u : tendsto u at_top (𝓝 a)⟩ :=
mem_closure_iff_seq_limit.mp hg,
obtain ⟨n₀, hn₀⟩ : ∃ n₀, ∀ n ≥ n₀, ‖u n / a‖ < b 0,
{ have : {x | ‖x / a‖ < b 0} ∈ 𝓝 a,
{ simp_rw ← dist_eq_norm_div,
exact metric.ball_mem_nhds _ (b_pos _) },
exact filter.tendsto_at_top'.mp lim_u _ this },
set z : ℕ → E := λ n, u (n + n₀),
have lim_z : tendsto z at_top (𝓝 a) := lim_u.comp (tendsto_add_at_top_nat n₀),
have mem_𝓤 : ∀ n, {p : E × E | ‖p.1 / p.2‖ < b (n + 1)} ∈ 𝓤 E :=
λ n, by simpa [← dist_eq_norm_div] using metric.dist_mem_uniformity (b_pos $ n+1),
obtain ⟨φ : ℕ → ℕ, φ_extr : strict_mono φ,
hφ : ∀ n, ‖z (φ $ n + 1) / z (φ n)‖ < b (n + 1)⟩ :=
lim_z.cauchy_seq.subseq_mem mem_𝓤,
set w : ℕ → E := z ∘ φ,
have hw : tendsto w at_top (𝓝 a),
from lim_z.comp φ_extr.tendsto_at_top,
set v : ℕ → E := λ i, if i = 0 then w 0 else w i / w (i - 1),
refine ⟨v, tendsto.congr (finset.eq_prod_range_div' w) hw , _,
hn₀ _ (n₀.le_add_left _), _⟩,
{ rintro ⟨⟩,
{ change w 0 ∈ s,
apply u_in },
{ apply s.div_mem ; apply u_in }, },
{ intros l hl,
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ : ∃ k, l = k+1, exact nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hl.ne',
apply hφ }
end
@[to_additive] lemma controlled_prod_of_mem_closure_range {j : E →* F} {b : F}
(hb : b ∈ closure (j.range : set F)) {f : ℕ → ℝ} (b_pos : ∀ n, 0 < f n) :
∃ a : ℕ → E,
tendsto (λ n, ∏ i in range (n + 1), j (a i)) at_top (𝓝 b) ∧
‖j (a 0) / b‖ < f 0 ∧
∀ n, 0 < n → ‖j (a n)‖ < f n :=
begin
obtain ⟨v, sum_v, v_in, hv₀, hv_pos⟩ := controlled_prod_of_mem_closure hb b_pos,
choose g hg using v_in,
refine ⟨g, by simpa [← hg] using sum_v, by simpa [hg 0] using hv₀, λ n hn,
by simpa [hg] using hv_pos n hn⟩,
end
@[to_additive] lemma nndist_mul_mul_le (a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : E) :
nndist (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) ≤ nndist a₁ b₁ + nndist a₂ b₂ :=
nnreal.coe_le_coe.1 $ dist_mul_mul_le a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂
@[to_additive]
lemma edist_mul_mul_le (a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : E) : edist (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) ≤ edist a₁ b₁ + edist a₂ b₂ :=
by { simp only [edist_nndist], norm_cast, apply nndist_mul_mul_le }
@[simp, to_additive] lemma edist_mul_left (a b₁ b₂ : E) : edist (a * b₁) (a * b₂) = edist b₁ b₂ :=
by simp [edist_dist]
@[to_additive]
lemma edist_inv (a b : E) : edist a⁻¹ b = edist a b⁻¹ := by simp_rw [edist_dist, dist_inv]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma edist_inv_inv (x y : E) : edist x⁻¹ y⁻¹ = edist x y :=
by rw [edist_inv, inv_inv]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma edist_div_left (a b₁ b₂ : E) : edist (a / b₁) (a / b₂) = edist b₁ b₂ :=
by simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, edist_mul_left, edist_inv_inv]
@[to_additive]
lemma nnnorm_multiset_prod_le (m : multiset E) : ‖m.prod‖₊ ≤ (m.map (λ x, ‖x‖₊)).sum :=
nnreal.coe_le_coe.1 $ by { push_cast, rw multiset.map_map, exact norm_multiset_prod_le _ }
@[to_additive] lemma nnnorm_prod_le (s : finset ι) (f : ι → E) :
‖∏ a in s, f a‖₊ ≤ ∑ a in s, ‖f a‖₊ :=
nnreal.coe_le_coe.1 $ by { push_cast, exact norm_prod_le _ _ }
@[to_additive]
lemma nnnorm_prod_le_of_le (s : finset ι) {f : ι → E} {n : ι → ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ b ∈ s, ‖f b‖₊ ≤ n b) :
‖∏ b in s, f b‖₊ ≤ ∑ b in s, n b :=
(norm_prod_le_of_le s h).trans_eq nnreal.coe_sum.symm
namespace real
instance : has_norm ℝ := { norm := λ r, |r| }
@[simp] lemma norm_eq_abs (r : ℝ) : ‖r‖ = |r| := rfl
instance : normed_add_comm_group ℝ := ⟨λ r y, rfl⟩
lemma norm_of_nonneg (hr : 0 ≤ r) : ‖r‖ = r := abs_of_nonneg hr
lemma norm_of_nonpos (hr : r ≤ 0) : ‖r‖ = -r := abs_of_nonpos hr
lemma le_norm_self (r : ℝ) : r ≤ ‖r‖ := le_abs_self r
@[simp] lemma norm_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : ‖(n : ℝ)‖ = n := abs_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : ‖(n : ℝ)‖₊ = n := nnreal.eq $ norm_coe_nat _
@[simp] lemma norm_two : ‖(2 : ℝ)‖ = 2 := abs_of_pos zero_lt_two
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_two : ‖(2 : ℝ)‖₊ = 2 := nnreal.eq $ by simp
lemma nnnorm_of_nonneg (hr : 0 ≤ r) : ‖r‖₊ = ⟨r, hr⟩ := nnreal.eq $ norm_of_nonneg hr
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_abs (r : ℝ) : ‖(|r|)‖₊ = ‖r‖₊ := by simp [nnnorm]
lemma ennnorm_eq_of_real (hr : 0 ≤ r) : (‖r‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) = ennreal.of_real r :=
by { rw [← of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm, norm_of_nonneg hr] }
lemma ennnorm_eq_of_real_abs (r : ℝ) : (‖r‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) = ennreal.of_real (|r|) :=
by rw [← real.nnnorm_abs r, real.ennnorm_eq_of_real (abs_nonneg _)]
lemma to_nnreal_eq_nnnorm_of_nonneg (hr : 0 ≤ r) : r.to_nnreal = ‖r‖₊ :=
begin
rw real.to_nnreal_of_nonneg hr,
congr,
rw [real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg hr],
end
lemma of_real_le_ennnorm (r : ℝ) : ennreal.of_real r ≤ ‖r‖₊ :=
begin
obtain hr | hr := le_total 0 r,
{ exact (real.ennnorm_eq_of_real hr).ge },
{ rw [ennreal.of_real_eq_zero.2 hr],
exact bot_le }
end
end real
namespace lipschitz_with
variables [pseudo_emetric_space α] {K Kf Kg : ℝ≥0} {f g : α → E}
@[to_additive] lemma inv (hf : lipschitz_with K f) : lipschitz_with K (λ x, (f x)⁻¹) :=
λ x y, (edist_inv_inv _ _).trans_le $ hf x y
@[to_additive add] lemma mul' (hf : lipschitz_with Kf f) (hg : lipschitz_with Kg g) :
lipschitz_with (Kf + Kg) (λ x, f x * g x) :=
λ x y, calc
edist (f x * g x) (f y * g y) ≤ edist (f x) (f y) + edist (g x) (g y) : edist_mul_mul_le _ _ _ _
... ≤ Kf * edist x y + Kg * edist x y : add_le_add (hf x y) (hg x y)
... = (Kf + Kg) * edist x y : (add_mul _ _ _).symm
@[to_additive] lemma div (hf : lipschitz_with Kf f) (hg : lipschitz_with Kg g) :
lipschitz_with (Kf + Kg) (λ x, f x / g x) :=
by simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul' hg.inv
end lipschitz_with
namespace antilipschitz_with
variables [pseudo_emetric_space α] {K Kf Kg : ℝ≥0} {f g : α → E}
@[to_additive] lemma mul_lipschitz_with (hf : antilipschitz_with Kf f) (hg : lipschitz_with Kg g)
(hK : Kg < Kf⁻¹) : antilipschitz_with (Kf⁻¹ - Kg)⁻¹ (λ x, f x * g x) :=
begin
letI : pseudo_metric_space α := pseudo_emetric_space.to_pseudo_metric_space hf.edist_ne_top,
refine antilipschitz_with.of_le_mul_dist (λ x y, _),
rw [nnreal.coe_inv, ← div_eq_inv_mul],
rw le_div_iff (nnreal.coe_pos.2 $ tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hK),
rw [mul_comm, nnreal.coe_sub hK.le, sub_mul],
calc ↑Kf⁻¹ * dist x y - Kg * dist x y ≤ dist (f x) (f y) - dist (g x) (g y) :
sub_le_sub (hf.mul_le_dist x y) (hg.dist_le_mul x y)
... ≤ _ : le_trans (le_abs_self _) (abs_dist_sub_le_dist_mul_mul _ _ _ _),
end
@[to_additive] lemma mul_div_lipschitz_with (hf : antilipschitz_with Kf f)
(hg : lipschitz_with Kg (g / f)) (hK : Kg < Kf⁻¹) : antilipschitz_with (Kf⁻¹ - Kg)⁻¹ g :=
by simpa only [pi.div_apply, mul_div_cancel'_right] using hf.mul_lipschitz_with hg hK
@[to_additive] lemma le_mul_norm_div {f : E → F} (hf : antilipschitz_with K f) (x y : E) :
‖x / y‖ ≤ K * ‖f x / f y‖ :=
by simp [← dist_eq_norm_div, hf.le_mul_dist x y]
end antilipschitz_with
@[priority 100, to_additive] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance seminormed_comm_group.to_has_lipschitz_mul : has_lipschitz_mul E :=
⟨⟨1 + 1, lipschitz_with.prod_fst.mul' lipschitz_with.prod_snd⟩⟩
/-- A seminormed group is a uniform group, i.e., multiplication and division are uniformly
continuous. -/
@[priority 100, to_additive "A seminormed group is a uniform additive group, i.e., addition and
subtraction are uniformly continuous."] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance seminormed_comm_group.to_uniform_group : uniform_group E :=
⟨(lipschitz_with.prod_fst.div lipschitz_with.prod_snd).uniform_continuous⟩
-- short-circuit type class inference
@[priority 100, to_additive] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance seminormed_comm_group.to_topological_group : topological_group E := infer_instance
@[to_additive] lemma cauchy_seq_prod_of_eventually_eq {u v : ℕ → E} {N : ℕ}
(huv : ∀ n ≥ N, u n = v n) (hv : cauchy_seq (λ n, ∏ k in range (n+1), v k)) :
cauchy_seq (λ n, ∏ k in range (n + 1), u k) :=
begin
let d : ℕ → E := λ n, ∏ k in range (n + 1), (u k / v k),
rw show (λ n, ∏ k in range (n + 1), u k) = d * (λ n, ∏ k in range (n + 1), v k),
by { ext n, simp [d] },
suffices : ∀ n ≥ N, d n = d N,
{ exact (tendsto_at_top_of_eventually_const this).cauchy_seq.mul hv },
intros n hn,
dsimp [d],
rw eventually_constant_prod _ hn,
intros m hm,
simp [huv m hm],
end
end seminormed_comm_group
section normed_group
variables [normed_group E] [normed_group F] {a b : E}
@[simp, to_additive norm_eq_zero] lemma norm_eq_zero'' : ‖a‖ = 0 ↔ a = 1 := norm_eq_zero'''
@[to_additive norm_ne_zero_iff] lemma norm_ne_zero_iff' : ‖a‖ ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 1 := norm_eq_zero''.not
@[simp, to_additive norm_pos_iff] lemma norm_pos_iff'' : 0 < ‖a‖ ↔ a ≠ 1 := norm_pos_iff'''
@[simp, to_additive norm_le_zero_iff]
lemma norm_le_zero_iff'' : ‖a‖ ≤ 0 ↔ a = 1 := norm_le_zero_iff'''
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_div_eq_zero_iff : ‖a / b‖ = 0 ↔ a = b := by rw [norm_eq_zero'', div_eq_one]
@[to_additive] lemma norm_div_pos_iff : 0 < ‖a / b‖ ↔ a ≠ b :=
by { rw [(norm_nonneg' _).lt_iff_ne, ne_comm], exact norm_div_eq_zero_iff.not }
@[to_additive] lemma eq_of_norm_div_le_zero (h : ‖a / b‖ ≤ 0) : a = b :=
by rwa [←div_eq_one, ← norm_le_zero_iff'']
alias norm_div_eq_zero_iff ↔ eq_of_norm_div_eq_zero _
attribute [to_additive] eq_of_norm_div_eq_zero
@[simp, to_additive nnnorm_eq_zero] lemma nnnorm_eq_zero' : ‖a‖₊ = 0 ↔ a = 1 :=
by rw [← nnreal.coe_eq_zero, coe_nnnorm', norm_eq_zero'']
@[to_additive nnnorm_ne_zero_iff]
lemma nnnorm_ne_zero_iff' : ‖a‖₊ ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 1 := nnnorm_eq_zero'.not
@[to_additive]
lemma tendsto_norm_div_self_punctured_nhds (a : E) : tendsto (λ x, ‖x / a‖) (𝓝[≠] a) (𝓝[>] 0) :=
(tendsto_norm_div_self a).inf $ tendsto_principal_principal.2 $ λ x hx, norm_pos_iff''.2 $
div_ne_one.2 hx
@[to_additive] lemma tendsto_norm_nhds_within_one : tendsto (norm : E → ℝ) (𝓝[≠] 1) (𝓝[>] 0) :=
tendsto_norm_one.inf $ tendsto_principal_principal.2 $ λ x, norm_pos_iff''.2
variables (E)
/-- The norm of a normed group as a group norm. -/
@[to_additive "The norm of a normed group as an additive group norm."]
def norm_group_norm : group_norm E :=
{ eq_one_of_map_eq_zero' := λ _, norm_eq_zero''.1, ..norm_group_seminorm _ }
@[simp] lemma coe_norm_group_norm : ⇑(norm_group_norm E) = norm := rfl
end normed_group
section normed_add_group
variables [normed_add_group E] [topological_space α] {f : α → E}
/-! Some relations with `has_compact_support` -/
lemma has_compact_support_norm_iff : has_compact_support (λ x, ‖f x‖) ↔ has_compact_support f :=
has_compact_support_comp_left $ λ x, norm_eq_zero
alias has_compact_support_norm_iff ↔ _ has_compact_support.norm
lemma continuous.bounded_above_of_compact_support (hf : continuous f) (h : has_compact_support f) :
∃ C, ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C :=
by simpa [bdd_above_def] using hf.norm.bdd_above_range_of_has_compact_support h.norm
end normed_add_group
/-! ### `ulift` -/
namespace ulift
section has_norm
variables [has_norm E]
instance : has_norm (ulift E) := ⟨λ x, ‖x.down‖⟩
lemma norm_def (x : ulift E) : ‖x‖ = ‖x.down‖ := rfl
@[simp] lemma norm_up (x : E) : ‖ulift.up x‖ = ‖x‖ := rfl
@[simp] lemma norm_down (x : ulift E) : ‖x.down‖ = ‖x‖ := rfl
end has_norm
section has_nnnorm
variables [has_nnnorm E]
instance : has_nnnorm (ulift E) := ⟨λ x, ‖x.down‖₊⟩
lemma nnnorm_def (x : ulift E) : ‖x‖₊ = ‖x.down‖₊ := rfl
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_up (x : E) : ‖ulift.up x‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ := rfl
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_down (x : ulift E) : ‖x.down‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ := rfl
end has_nnnorm
@[to_additive] instance seminormed_group [seminormed_group E] : seminormed_group (ulift E) :=
seminormed_group.induced _ _ (⟨ulift.down, rfl, λ _ _, rfl⟩ : ulift E →* E)
@[to_additive]
instance seminormed_comm_group [seminormed_comm_group E] : seminormed_comm_group (ulift E) :=
seminormed_comm_group.induced _ _ (⟨ulift.down, rfl, λ _ _, rfl⟩ : ulift E →* E)
@[to_additive] instance normed_group [normed_group E] : normed_group (ulift E) :=
normed_group.induced _ _ (⟨ulift.down, rfl, λ _ _, rfl⟩ : ulift E →* E) down_injective
@[to_additive]
instance normed_comm_group [normed_comm_group E] : normed_comm_group (ulift E) :=
normed_comm_group.induced _ _ (⟨ulift.down, rfl, λ _ _, rfl⟩ : ulift E →* E) down_injective
end ulift
/-! ### `additive`, `multiplicative` -/
section additive_multiplicative
open additive multiplicative
section has_norm
variables [has_norm E]
instance : has_norm (additive E) := ‹has_norm E›
instance : has_norm (multiplicative E) := ‹has_norm E›
@[simp] lemma norm_to_mul (x) : ‖(to_mul x : E)‖ = ‖x‖ := rfl
@[simp] lemma norm_of_mul (x : E) : ‖of_mul x‖ = ‖x‖ := rfl
@[simp] lemma norm_to_add (x) : ‖(to_add x : E)‖ = ‖x‖ := rfl
@[simp] lemma norm_of_add (x : E) : ‖of_add x‖ = ‖x‖ := rfl
end has_norm
section has_nnnorm
variables [has_nnnorm E]
instance : has_nnnorm (additive E) := ‹has_nnnorm E›
instance : has_nnnorm (multiplicative E) := ‹has_nnnorm E›
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_to_mul (x) : ‖(to_mul x : E)‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ := rfl
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_of_mul (x : E) : ‖of_mul x‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ := rfl
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_to_add (x) : ‖(to_add x : E)‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ := rfl
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_of_add (x : E) : ‖of_add x‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ := rfl
end has_nnnorm
instance [seminormed_group E] : seminormed_add_group (additive E) :=
{ dist_eq := dist_eq_norm_div }
instance [seminormed_add_group E] : seminormed_group (multiplicative E) :=
{ dist_eq := dist_eq_norm_sub }
instance [seminormed_comm_group E] : seminormed_add_comm_group (additive E) :=
{ ..additive.seminormed_add_group }
instance [seminormed_add_comm_group E] : seminormed_comm_group (multiplicative E) :=
{ ..multiplicative.seminormed_group }
instance [normed_group E] : normed_add_group (additive E) :=
{ ..additive.seminormed_add_group }
instance [normed_add_group E] : normed_group (multiplicative E) :=
{ ..multiplicative.seminormed_group }
instance [normed_comm_group E] : normed_add_comm_group (additive E) :=
{ ..additive.seminormed_add_group }
instance [normed_add_comm_group E] : normed_comm_group (multiplicative E) :=
{ ..multiplicative.seminormed_group }
end additive_multiplicative
/-! ### Order dual -/
section order_dual
open order_dual
section has_norm
variables [has_norm E]
instance : has_norm Eᵒᵈ := ‹has_norm E›
@[simp] lemma norm_to_dual (x : E) : ‖to_dual x‖ = ‖x‖ := rfl
@[simp] lemma norm_of_dual (x : Eᵒᵈ) : ‖of_dual x‖ = ‖x‖ := rfl
end has_norm
section has_nnnorm
variables [has_nnnorm E]
instance : has_nnnorm Eᵒᵈ := ‹has_nnnorm E›
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_to_dual (x : E) : ‖to_dual x‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ := rfl
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_of_dual (x : Eᵒᵈ) : ‖of_dual x‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ := rfl
end has_nnnorm
@[priority 100, to_additive] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance [seminormed_group E] : seminormed_group Eᵒᵈ := ‹seminormed_group E›
@[priority 100, to_additive] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance [seminormed_comm_group E] : seminormed_comm_group Eᵒᵈ := ‹seminormed_comm_group E›
@[priority 100, to_additive] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance [normed_group E] : normed_group Eᵒᵈ := ‹normed_group E›
@[priority 100, to_additive] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance [normed_comm_group E] : normed_comm_group Eᵒᵈ := ‹normed_comm_group E›
end order_dual
/-! ### Binary product of normed groups -/
section has_norm
variables [has_norm E] [has_norm F] {x : E × F} {r : ℝ}
instance : has_norm (E × F) := ⟨λ x, ‖x.1‖ ⊔ ‖x.2‖⟩
lemma prod.norm_def (x : E × F) : ‖x‖ = (max ‖x.1‖ ‖x.2‖) := rfl
lemma norm_fst_le (x : E × F) : ‖x.1‖ ≤ ‖x‖ := le_max_left _ _
lemma norm_snd_le (x : E × F) : ‖x.2‖ ≤ ‖x‖ := le_max_right _ _
lemma norm_prod_le_iff : ‖x‖ ≤ r ↔ ‖x.1‖ ≤ r ∧ ‖x.2‖ ≤ r := max_le_iff
end has_norm
section seminormed_group
variables [seminormed_group E] [seminormed_group F]
/-- Product of seminormed groups, using the sup norm. -/
@[to_additive "Product of seminormed groups, using the sup norm."]
instance : seminormed_group (E × F) :=
⟨λ x y, by simp only [prod.norm_def, prod.dist_eq, dist_eq_norm_div, prod.fst_div, prod.snd_div]⟩
@[to_additive prod.nnnorm_def']
lemma prod.nnorm_def (x : E × F) : ‖x‖₊ = (max ‖x.1‖₊ ‖x.2‖₊) := rfl
end seminormed_group
/-- Product of seminormed groups, using the sup norm. -/
@[to_additive "Product of seminormed groups, using the sup norm."]
instance [seminormed_comm_group E] [seminormed_comm_group F] : seminormed_comm_group (E × F) :=
{ ..prod.seminormed_group }
/-- Product of normed groups, using the sup norm. -/
@[to_additive "Product of normed groups, using the sup norm."]
instance [normed_group E] [normed_group F] : normed_group (E × F) := { ..prod.seminormed_group }
/-- Product of normed groups, using the sup norm. -/
@[to_additive "Product of normed groups, using the sup norm."]
instance [normed_comm_group E] [normed_comm_group F] : normed_comm_group (E × F) :=
{ ..prod.seminormed_group }
/-! ### Finite product of normed groups -/
section pi
variables {π : ι → Type*} [fintype ι]
section seminormed_group
variables [Π i, seminormed_group (π i)] [seminormed_group E] (f : Π i, π i) {x : Π i, π i} {r : ℝ}
/-- Finite product of seminormed groups, using the sup norm. -/
@[to_additive "Finite product of seminormed groups, using the sup norm."]
instance : seminormed_group (Π i, π i) :=
{ norm := λ f, ↑(finset.univ.sup (λ b, ‖f b‖₊)),
dist_eq := λ x y,
congr_arg (coe : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) $ congr_arg (finset.sup finset.univ) $ funext $ λ a,
show nndist (x a) (y a) = ‖x a / y a‖₊, from nndist_eq_nnnorm_div (x a) (y a) }
@[to_additive pi.norm_def] lemma pi.norm_def' : ‖f‖ = ↑(finset.univ.sup (λ b, ‖f b‖₊)) := rfl
@[to_additive pi.nnnorm_def] lemma pi.nnnorm_def' : ‖f‖₊ = finset.univ.sup (λ b, ‖f b‖₊) :=
subtype.eta _ _
/-- The seminorm of an element in a product space is `≤ r` if and only if the norm of each
component is. -/
@[to_additive pi_norm_le_iff_of_nonneg "The seminorm of an element in a product space is `≤ r` if
and only if the norm of each component is."]
lemma pi_norm_le_iff_of_nonneg' (hr : 0 ≤ r) : ‖x‖ ≤ r ↔ ∀ i, ‖x i‖ ≤ r :=
by simp only [←dist_one_right, dist_pi_le_iff hr, pi.one_apply]
@[to_additive pi_nnnorm_le_iff]
lemma pi_nnnorm_le_iff' {r : ℝ≥0} : ‖x‖₊ ≤ r ↔ ∀ i, ‖x i‖₊ ≤ r :=
pi_norm_le_iff_of_nonneg' r.coe_nonneg
@[to_additive pi_norm_le_iff_of_nonempty]
lemma pi_norm_le_iff_of_nonempty' [nonempty ι] : ‖f‖ ≤ r ↔ ∀ b, ‖f b‖ ≤ r :=
begin
by_cases hr : 0 ≤ r,
{ exact pi_norm_le_iff_of_nonneg' hr },
{ exact iff_of_false (λ h, hr $ (norm_nonneg' _).trans h)
(λ h, hr $ (norm_nonneg' _).trans $ h $ classical.arbitrary _) }
end
/-- The seminorm of an element in a product space is `< r` if and only if the norm of each
component is. -/
@[to_additive pi_norm_lt_iff "The seminorm of an element in a product space is `< r` if and only if
the norm of each component is."]
lemma pi_norm_lt_iff' (hr : 0 < r) : ‖x‖ < r ↔ ∀ i, ‖x i‖ < r :=
by simp only [←dist_one_right, dist_pi_lt_iff hr, pi.one_apply]
@[to_additive pi_nnnorm_lt_iff]
lemma pi_nnnorm_lt_iff' {r : ℝ≥0} (hr : 0 < r) : ‖x‖₊ < r ↔ ∀ i, ‖x i‖₊ < r := pi_norm_lt_iff' hr
@[to_additive norm_le_pi_norm]
lemma norm_le_pi_norm' (i : ι) : ‖f i‖ ≤ ‖f‖ :=
(pi_norm_le_iff_of_nonneg' $ norm_nonneg' _).1 le_rfl i
@[to_additive nnnorm_le_pi_nnnorm]
lemma nnnorm_le_pi_nnnorm' (i : ι) : ‖f i‖₊ ≤ ‖f‖₊ := norm_le_pi_norm' _ i
@[to_additive pi_norm_const_le]
lemma pi_norm_const_le' (a : E) : ‖(λ _ : ι, a)‖ ≤ ‖a‖ :=
(pi_norm_le_iff_of_nonneg' $ norm_nonneg' _).2 $ λ _, le_rfl
@[to_additive pi_nnnorm_const_le]
lemma pi_nnnorm_const_le' (a : E) : ‖(λ _ : ι, a)‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ := pi_norm_const_le' _
@[simp, to_additive pi_norm_const]
lemma pi_norm_const' [nonempty ι] (a : E) : ‖(λ i : ι, a)‖ = ‖a‖ :=
by simpa only [←dist_one_right] using dist_pi_const a 1
@[simp, to_additive pi_nnnorm_const]
lemma pi_nnnorm_const' [nonempty ι] (a : E) : ‖(λ i : ι, a)‖₊ = ‖a‖₊ := nnreal.eq $ pi_norm_const' a
/-- The $L^1$ norm is less than the $L^\infty$ norm scaled by the cardinality. -/
@[to_additive pi.sum_norm_apply_le_norm "The $L^1$ norm is less than the $L^\\infty$ norm scaled by
the cardinality."]
lemma pi.sum_norm_apply_le_norm' : ∑ i, ‖f i‖ ≤ fintype.card ι • ‖f‖ :=
finset.sum_le_card_nsmul _ _ _ $ λ i hi, norm_le_pi_norm' _ i
/-- The $L^1$ norm is less than the $L^\infty$ norm scaled by the cardinality. -/
@[to_additive pi.sum_nnnorm_apply_le_nnnorm "The $L^1$ norm is less than the $L^\\infty$ norm scaled
by the cardinality."]
lemma pi.sum_nnnorm_apply_le_nnnorm' : ∑ i, ‖f i‖₊ ≤ fintype.card ι • ‖f‖₊ :=
nnreal.coe_sum.trans_le $ pi.sum_norm_apply_le_norm' _
end seminormed_group
/-- Finite product of seminormed groups, using the sup norm. -/
@[to_additive "Finite product of seminormed groups, using the sup norm."]
instance pi.seminormed_comm_group [Π i, seminormed_comm_group (π i)] :
seminormed_comm_group (Π i, π i) :=
{ ..pi.seminormed_group }
/-- Finite product of normed groups, using the sup norm. -/
@[to_additive "Finite product of seminormed groups, using the sup norm."]
instance pi.normed_group [Π i, normed_group (π i)] : normed_group (Π i, π i) :=
{ ..pi.seminormed_group }
/-- Finite product of normed groups, using the sup norm. -/
@[to_additive "Finite product of seminormed groups, using the sup norm."]
instance pi.normed_comm_group [Π i, normed_comm_group (π i)] : normed_comm_group (Π i, π i) :=
{ ..pi.seminormed_group }
end pi
/-! ### Subgroups of normed groups -/
namespace subgroup
section seminormed_group
variables [seminormed_group E] {s : subgroup E}
/-- A subgroup of a seminormed group is also a seminormed group,
with the restriction of the norm. -/
@[to_additive "A subgroup of a seminormed group is also a seminormed group,
with the restriction of the norm."]
instance seminormed_group : seminormed_group s := seminormed_group.induced _ _ s.subtype
/-- If `x` is an element of a subgroup `s` of a seminormed group `E`, its norm in `s` is equal to
its norm in `E`. -/
@[simp, to_additive "If `x` is an element of a subgroup `s` of a seminormed group `E`, its norm in
`s` is equal to its norm in `E`."]
lemma coe_norm (x : s) : ‖x‖ = ‖(x : E)‖ := rfl
/-- If `x` is an element of a subgroup `s` of a seminormed group `E`, its norm in `s` is equal to
its norm in `E`.
This is a reversed version of the `simp` lemma `subgroup.coe_norm` for use by `norm_cast`. -/
@[norm_cast, to_additive "If `x` is an element of a subgroup `s` of a seminormed group `E`, its norm
in `s` is equal to its norm in `E`.
This is a reversed version of the `simp` lemma `add_subgroup.coe_norm` for use by `norm_cast`."]
lemma norm_coe {s : subgroup E} (x : s) : ‖(x : E)‖ = ‖x‖ := rfl
end seminormed_group
@[to_additive] instance seminormed_comm_group [seminormed_comm_group E] {s : subgroup E} :
seminormed_comm_group s :=
seminormed_comm_group.induced _ _ s.subtype
@[to_additive] instance normed_group [normed_group E] {s : subgroup E} : normed_group s :=
normed_group.induced _ _ s.subtype subtype.coe_injective
@[to_additive]
instance normed_comm_group [normed_comm_group E] {s : subgroup E} : normed_comm_group s :=
normed_comm_group.induced _ _ s.subtype subtype.coe_injective
end subgroup
/-! ### Submodules of normed groups -/
namespace submodule
/-- A submodule of a seminormed group is also a seminormed group, with the restriction of the norm.
-/
-- See note [implicit instance arguments]
instance seminormed_add_comm_group {_ : ring 𝕜} [seminormed_add_comm_group E] {_ : module 𝕜 E}
(s : submodule 𝕜 E) :
seminormed_add_comm_group s :=
seminormed_add_comm_group.induced _ _ s.subtype.to_add_monoid_hom
/-- If `x` is an element of a submodule `s` of a normed group `E`, its norm in `s` is equal to its
norm in `E`. -/
-- See note [implicit instance arguments].
@[simp] lemma coe_norm {_ : ring 𝕜} [seminormed_add_comm_group E] {_ : module 𝕜 E}
{s : submodule 𝕜 E} (x : s) :
‖x‖ = ‖(x : E)‖ := rfl
/-- If `x` is an element of a submodule `s` of a normed group `E`, its norm in `E` is equal to its
norm in `s`.
This is a reversed version of the `simp` lemma `submodule.coe_norm` for use by `norm_cast`. -/
-- See note [implicit instance arguments].
@[norm_cast] lemma norm_coe {_ : ring 𝕜} [seminormed_add_comm_group E] {_ : module 𝕜 E}
{s : submodule 𝕜 E} (x : s) :
‖(x : E)‖ = ‖x‖ := rfl
/-- A submodule of a normed group is also a normed group, with the restriction of the norm. -/
-- See note [implicit instance arguments].
instance {_ : ring 𝕜} [normed_add_comm_group E] {_ : module 𝕜 E} (s : submodule 𝕜 E) :
normed_add_comm_group s :=
{ ..submodule.seminormed_add_comm_group s }
end submodule
|
bb705818ffda63ca5dcea46fcec5757c7fc5f447 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /src/Lean/Server/Rpc/Deriving.lean | 32e95ce67388d0627a7324a59e391513289012ac | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,712 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Wojciech Nawrocki
-/
import Lean.Elab.Command
import Lean.Elab.Term
import Lean.Elab.Deriving.Basic
import Lean.Elab.Deriving.Util
import Lean.Server.Rpc.Basic
namespace Lean.Server.RpcEncodable
open Meta Elab Command Term
def isOptField (n : Name) : Bool := n.toString.endsWith "?"
open Parser.Term
private def deriveStructureInstance (indVal : InductiveVal) (params : Array Expr)
(encInstBinders : Array (TSyntax ``bracketedBinder)) : TermElabM Command := do
let fields := getStructureFieldsFlattened (← getEnv) indVal.name (includeSubobjectFields := false)
trace[Elab.Deriving.RpcEncodable] "for structure {indVal.name} with params {params}"
let mut fieldIds := #[]
let mut fieldTys := #[]
let mut encInits := #[]
let mut decInits := #[]
for fieldName in fields do
let fid := mkIdent fieldName
fieldIds := fieldIds.push fid
if isOptField fieldName then
fieldTys := fieldTys.push (← `(Option Json))
encInits := encInits.push (← `(structInstField| $fid:ident := ← (a.$fid).mapM rpcEncode))
decInits := decInits.push (← `(structInstField| $fid:ident := ← (a.$fid).mapM rpcDecode))
else
fieldTys := fieldTys.push (← `(Json))
encInits := encInits.push (← `(structInstField| $fid:ident := ← rpcEncode a.$fid))
decInits := decInits.push (← `(structInstField| $fid:ident := ← rpcDecode a.$fid))
let paramIds ← params.mapM fun p => return mkIdent (← getFVarLocalDecl p).userName
`(structure RpcEncodablePacket where
$[($fieldIds : $fieldTys)]*
deriving FromJson, ToJson
variable $encInstBinders* in
instance : RpcEncodable (@$(mkCIdent indVal.name) $paramIds*) :=
{ rpcEncode := enc, rpcDecode := dec }
where
-- prevent inlining
enc a := return toJson { $[$encInits],* : RpcEncodablePacket }
dec j := do
let a : RpcEncodablePacket ← fromJson? j
return { $[$decInits],* }
)
private def matchAltTerm := Lean.Parser.Term.matchAlt (rhsParser := Lean.Parser.termParser)
instance : Coe (TSyntax ``matchAltTerm) (TSyntax ``Parser.Term.matchAlt) where coe s := ⟨s⟩
private def deriveInductiveInstance (indVal : InductiveVal) (params : Array Expr)
(encInstBinders : Array (TSyntax ``bracketedBinder)) : TermElabM Command := do
trace[Elab.Deriving.RpcEncodable] "for inductive {indVal.name} with params {params}"
let st ← indVal.ctors.toArray.mapM fun ctorName => do
let ctorTy ← instantiateForall (← getConstInfoCtor ctorName).type params
forallTelescopeReducing ctorTy fun argVars _ => do
let .str _ ctor := ctorName | throwError m!"constructor name not a string: {ctorName}"
let ctorId := mkIdent ctor
-- create the constructor
let fieldStxs ← argVars.mapM fun arg => do
let name := (← getFVarLocalDecl arg).userName
`(bracketedBinderF| ($(mkIdent name) : Json))
let pktCtor ← `(Parser.Command.ctor|
| $ctorId:ident $[$fieldStxs]* : RpcEncodablePacket)
-- create encoder and decoder match arms
let nms ← argVars.mapM fun _ => mkIdent <$> mkFreshBinderName
let encArgs ← nms.mapM fun nm => `(← rpcEncode $nm)
let encArm ← `(matchAltTerm| | .$ctorId $nms* => return toJson (.$ctorId $encArgs* : RpcEncodablePacket))
let decArgs ← nms.mapM fun nm => `(← rpcDecode $nm)
let decArm ← `(matchAltTerm| | .$ctorId $nms* => return (.$ctorId $decArgs*))
return (pktCtor, encArm, decArm)
let (ctors, st) := st.unzip
let (encodes, decodes) := st.unzip
-- helpers for type name syntax
let paramIds ← params.mapM fun p => return mkIdent (← getFVarLocalDecl p).userName
let typeId ← `(@$(mkIdent indVal.name) $paramIds*)
`(inductive RpcEncodablePacket where
$[$ctors:ctor]*
deriving FromJson, ToJson
variable $encInstBinders* in
partial instance : RpcEncodable $typeId :=
{ rpcEncode := enc, rpcDecode := dec }
where
enc x :=
have inst : RpcEncodable $typeId := { rpcEncode := enc, rpcDecode := dec }
match x with $[$encodes:matchAlt]*
dec j := do
have inst : RpcEncodable $typeId := { rpcEncode := enc, rpcDecode := dec }
let pkt : RpcEncodablePacket ← fromJson? j
id <| match pkt with $[$decodes:matchAlt]*
)
/-- Creates an `RpcEncodablePacket` for `typeName`. For structures, the packet is a structure
with the same field names. For inductives, it mirrors the inductive structure with every field
of every ctor replaced by `Json`. Then `RpcEncodable typeName` is instantiated
using the `RpcEncodablePacket`. -/
private def deriveInstance (declNames : Array Name) : CommandElabM Bool := do
let #[typeName] := declNames | return false
let indVal ← getConstInfoInduct typeName
if indVal.all.length ≠ 1 then
throwError "mutually inductive types are not supported"
if indVal.numIndices ≠ 0 then
throwError "indexed inductive families are not supported"
elabCommand <| ← liftTermElabM do
forallTelescopeReducing indVal.type fun params _ => do
let encInstBinders ← (← params.filterM (isType ·)).mapM fun p => do
`(bracketedBinderF| [RpcEncodable $(mkIdent (← getFVarLocalDecl p).userName):ident])
if isStructure (← getEnv) typeName then
deriveStructureInstance indVal params encInstBinders
else
deriveInductiveInstance indVal params encInstBinders
return true
initialize
registerDerivingHandler ``RpcEncodable deriveInstance
registerTraceClass `Elab.Deriving.RpcEncodable
end Lean.Server.RpcEncodable
|
de238969b2a1a04291863d2bc7b365b73e5a683c | 9dc8cecdf3c4634764a18254e94d43da07142918 | /src/data/list/join.lean | e46041af05a38d07f4cda847caef2d97c15bdf80 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcommelin/mathlib | d8456447c36c176e14d96d9e76f39841f69d2d9b | ee8279351a2e434c2852345c51b728d22af5a156 | refs/heads/master | 1,664,782,136,488 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 132,563,656 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,663,599,929,000 | 1,525,760,539,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,001 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.list.big_operators
/-!
# Join of a list of lists
This file proves basic properties of `list.join`, which concatenates a list of lists. It is defined
in [`data.list.defs`](./defs).
-/
variables {α β : Type*}
namespace list
attribute [simp] join
@[simp] lemma join_nil : [([] : list α)].join = [] := rfl
@[simp] lemma join_eq_nil : ∀ {L : list (list α)}, join L = [] ↔ ∀ l ∈ L, l = []
| [] := iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _)
| (l :: L) := by simp only [join, append_eq_nil, join_eq_nil, forall_mem_cons]
@[simp] lemma join_append (L₁ L₂ : list (list α)) : join (L₁ ++ L₂) = join L₁ ++ join L₂ :=
by induction L₁; [refl, simp only [*, join, cons_append, append_assoc]]
lemma join_concat (L : list (list α)) (l : list α) : join (L.concat l) = join L ++ l :=
by simp
@[simp] lemma join_filter_empty_eq_ff [decidable_pred (λ l : list α, l.empty = ff)] :
∀ {L : list (list α)}, join (L.filter (λ l, l.empty = ff)) = L.join
| [] := rfl
| ([] :: L) := by simp [@join_filter_empty_eq_ff L]
| ((a :: l) :: L) := by simp [@join_filter_empty_eq_ff L]
@[simp] lemma join_filter_ne_nil [decidable_pred (λ l : list α, l ≠ [])] {L : list (list α)} :
join (L.filter (λ l, l ≠ [])) = L.join :=
by simp [join_filter_empty_eq_ff, ← empty_iff_eq_nil]
lemma join_join (l : list (list (list α))) : l.join.join = (l.map join).join :=
by { induction l, simp, simp [l_ih] }
@[simp] lemma length_join (L : list (list α)) : length (join L) = sum (map length L) :=
by induction L; [refl, simp only [*, join, map, sum_cons, length_append]]
@[simp] lemma length_bind (l : list α) (f : α → list β) :
length (list.bind l f) = sum (map (length ∘ f) l) :=
by rw [list.bind, length_join, map_map]
@[simp] lemma bind_eq_nil {l : list α} {f : α → list β} :
list.bind l f = [] ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, f x = [] :=
join_eq_nil.trans $ by simp only [mem_map, forall_exists_index, and_imp, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂]
/-- In a join, taking the first elements up to an index which is the sum of the lengths of the
first `i` sublists, is the same as taking the join of the first `i` sublists. -/
lemma take_sum_join (L : list (list α)) (i : ℕ) :
L.join.take ((L.map length).take i).sum = (L.take i).join :=
begin
induction L generalizing i, { simp },
cases i, { simp },
simp [take_append, L_ih]
end
/-- In a join, dropping all the elements up to an index which is the sum of the lengths of the
first `i` sublists, is the same as taking the join after dropping the first `i` sublists. -/
lemma drop_sum_join (L : list (list α)) (i : ℕ) :
L.join.drop ((L.map length).take i).sum = (L.drop i).join :=
begin
induction L generalizing i, { simp },
cases i, { simp },
simp [drop_append, L_ih],
end
/-- Taking only the first `i+1` elements in a list, and then dropping the first `i` ones, one is
left with a list of length `1` made of the `i`-th element of the original list. -/
lemma drop_take_succ_eq_cons_nth_le (L : list α) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < L.length) :
(L.take (i+1)).drop i = [nth_le L i hi] :=
begin
induction L generalizing i,
{ simp only [length] at hi, exact (nat.not_succ_le_zero i hi).elim },
cases i, { simp },
have : i < L_tl.length,
{ simp at hi,
exact nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ hi },
simp [L_ih this],
refl
end
/-- In a join of sublists, taking the slice between the indices `A` and `B - 1` gives back the
original sublist of index `i` if `A` is the sum of the lenghts of sublists of index `< i`, and
`B` is the sum of the lengths of sublists of index `≤ i`. -/
lemma drop_take_succ_join_eq_nth_le (L : list (list α)) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < L.length) :
(L.join.take ((L.map length).take (i+1)).sum).drop ((L.map length).take i).sum = nth_le L i hi :=
begin
have : (L.map length).take i = ((L.take (i+1)).map length).take i, by simp [map_take, take_take],
simp [take_sum_join, this, drop_sum_join, drop_take_succ_eq_cons_nth_le _ hi]
end
/-- Auxiliary lemma to control elements in a join. -/
lemma sum_take_map_length_lt1 (L : list (list α)) {i j : ℕ}
(hi : i < L.length) (hj : j < (nth_le L i hi).length) :
((L.map length).take i).sum + j < ((L.map length).take (i+1)).sum :=
by simp [hi, sum_take_succ, hj]
/-- Auxiliary lemma to control elements in a join. -/
lemma sum_take_map_length_lt2 (L : list (list α)) {i j : ℕ}
(hi : i < L.length) (hj : j < (nth_le L i hi).length) :
((L.map length).take i).sum + j < L.join.length :=
begin
convert lt_of_lt_of_le (sum_take_map_length_lt1 L hi hj) (monotone_sum_take _ hi),
have : L.length = (L.map length).length, by simp,
simp [this, -length_map]
end
/-- The `n`-th element in a join of sublists is the `j`-th element of the `i`th sublist,
where `n` can be obtained in terms of `i` and `j` by adding the lengths of all the sublists
of index `< i`, and adding `j`. -/
lemma nth_le_join (L : list (list α)) {i j : ℕ}
(hi : i < L.length) (hj : j < (nth_le L i hi).length) :
nth_le L.join (((L.map length).take i).sum + j) (sum_take_map_length_lt2 L hi hj) =
nth_le (nth_le L i hi) j hj :=
by rw [nth_le_take L.join (sum_take_map_length_lt2 L hi hj) (sum_take_map_length_lt1 L hi hj),
nth_le_drop, nth_le_of_eq (drop_take_succ_join_eq_nth_le L hi)]
/-- Two lists of sublists are equal iff their joins coincide, as well as the lengths of the
sublists. -/
theorem eq_iff_join_eq (L L' : list (list α)) :
L = L' ↔ L.join = L'.join ∧ map length L = map length L' :=
begin
refine ⟨λ H, by simp [H], _⟩,
rintros ⟨join_eq, length_eq⟩,
apply ext_le,
{ have : length (map length L) = length (map length L'), by rw length_eq,
simpa using this },
{ assume n h₁ h₂,
rw [← drop_take_succ_join_eq_nth_le, ← drop_take_succ_join_eq_nth_le, join_eq, length_eq] }
end
end list
|
5694921f52bb854c5a001b0520c4c917760a4a26 | 5e3548e65f2c037cb94cd5524c90c623fbd6d46a | /src_icannos_totilas/reduction/cpge_reduction_003_a.lean | 7af6ea32372b203b649f944f92a93373f1d55e72 | [] | no_license | ahayat16/lean_exos | d4f08c30adb601a06511a71b5ffb4d22d12ef77f | 682f2552d5b04a8c8eb9e4ab15f875a91b03845c | refs/heads/main | 1,693,101,073,585 | 1,636,479,336,000 | 1,636,479,336,000 | 415,000,441 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 430 | lean | import algebra.module.basic
import algebra.module.linear_map
import linear_algebra.basic
import linear_algebra.prod
import linear_algebra.projection
import order.bounded_lattice
theorem cpge_reduction_3_a (R : Type*) (M : Type*)
[semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M]
[E : submodule R M] (u : linear_map R E E) (v : linear_map R E E) :
(u.comp v) = (v.comp u) -> v '' u.ker ⊂ u.ker ∧ u '' v.ker ⊂ v.ker := sorry |
560464e63c9f100fe10445e03fa6ec266e0ab567 | f57749ca63d6416f807b770f67559503fdb21001 | /library/algebra/group_bigops.lean | 3c308ec836df098aa4b77836325784d00eea1cb5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | aliassaf/lean | bd54e85bed07b1ff6f01396551867b2677cbc6ac | f9b069b6a50756588b309b3d716c447004203152 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,982,152,948 | 1,438,916,029,000 | 1,438,916,029,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,870 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad
Finite products on a monoid, and finite sums on an additive monoid.
We have to be careful with dependencies. This theory imports files from finset and list, which
import basic files from nat. Then nat imports this file to instantiate finite products and sums.
-/
import .group .group_power data.list.basic data.list.perm data.finset.basic
open algebra function binary quot subtype list finset
namespace algebra
variables {A B : Type}
variable [deceqA : decidable_eq A]
/- Prodl: product indexed by a list -/
section monoid
variable [mB : monoid B]
include mB
definition mulf (f : A → B) : B → A → B :=
λ b a, b * f a
definition Prodl (l : list A) (f : A → B) : B :=
list.foldl (mulf f) 1 l
-- ∏ x ← l, f x
notation `∏` binders `←` l, r:(scoped f, Prodl l f) := r
private theorem foldl_const (f : A → B) :
∀ (l : list A) (b : B), foldl (mulf f) b l = b * foldl (mulf f) 1 l
| [] b := by rewrite [*foldl_nil, mul_one]
| (a::l) b := by rewrite [*foldl_cons, foldl_const, {foldl _ (mulf f 1 a) _}foldl_const, ↑mulf,
one_mul, mul.assoc]
theorem Prodl_nil (f : A → B) : Prodl [] f = 1 := rfl
theorem Prodl_cons (f : A → B) (a : A) (l : list A) : Prodl (a::l) f = f a * Prodl l f :=
by rewrite [↑Prodl, foldl_cons, foldl_const, ↑mulf, one_mul]
theorem Prodl_append :
∀ (l₁ l₂ : list A) (f : A → B), Prodl (l₁++l₂) f = Prodl l₁ f * Prodl l₂ f
| [] l₂ f := by rewrite [append_nil_left, Prodl_nil, one_mul]
| (a::l) l₂ f := by rewrite [append_cons, *Prodl_cons, Prodl_append, mul.assoc]
section deceqA
include deceqA
theorem Prodl_insert_of_mem (f : A → B) {a : A} {l : list A} : a ∈ l →
Prodl (insert a l) f = Prodl l f :=
assume ainl, by rewrite [insert_eq_of_mem ainl]
theorem Prodl_insert_of_not_mem (f : A → B) {a : A} {l : list A} :
a ∉ l → Prodl (insert a l) f = f a * Prodl l f :=
assume nainl, by rewrite [insert_eq_of_not_mem nainl, Prodl_cons]
theorem Prodl_union {l₁ l₂ : list A} (f : A → B) (d : disjoint l₁ l₂) :
Prodl (union l₁ l₂) f = Prodl l₁ f * Prodl l₂ f :=
by rewrite [union_eq_append d, Prodl_append]
end deceqA
theorem Prodl_one : ∀(l : list A), Prodl l (λ x, 1) = (1:B)
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by rewrite [Prodl_cons, Prodl_one, mul_one]
lemma Prodl_singleton {a : A} {f : A → B} : Prodl [a] f = f a :=
!one_mul
lemma Prodl_map {f : A → B} :
∀ {l : list A}, Prodl l f = Prodl (map f l) id
| nil := by rewrite [map_nil]
| (a::l) := begin rewrite [map_cons, Prodl_cons f, Prodl_cons id (f a), Prodl_map] end
open nat
lemma Prodl_eq_pow_of_const {f : A → B} :
∀ {l : list A} b, (∀ a, a ∈ l → f a = b) → Prodl l f = b ^ length l
| nil := take b, assume Pconst, by rewrite [length_nil, {b^0}algebra.pow_zero]
| (a::l) := take b, assume Pconst,
assert Pconstl : ∀ a', a' ∈ l → f a' = b,
from take a' Pa'in, Pconst a' (mem_cons_of_mem a Pa'in),
by rewrite [Prodl_cons f, Pconst a !mem_cons, Prodl_eq_pow_of_const b Pconstl, length_cons, add_one, pow_succ' b]
end monoid
section comm_monoid
variable [cmB : comm_monoid B]
include cmB
theorem Prodl_mul (l : list A) (f g : A → B) : Prodl l (λx, f x * g x) = Prodl l f * Prodl l g :=
list.induction_on l
(by rewrite [*Prodl_nil, mul_one])
(take a l,
assume IH,
by rewrite [*Prodl_cons, IH, *mul.assoc, mul.left_comm (Prodl l f)])
end comm_monoid
/- Prod: product indexed by a finset -/
section comm_monoid
variable [cmB : comm_monoid B]
include cmB
theorem mulf_rcomm (f : A → B) : right_commutative (mulf f) :=
right_commutative_compose_right (@has_mul.mul B cmB) f (@mul.right_comm B cmB)
theorem Prodl_eq_Prodl_of_perm (f : A → B) {l₁ l₂ : list A} :
perm l₁ l₂ → Prodl l₁ f = Prodl l₂ f :=
λ p, perm.foldl_eq_of_perm (mulf_rcomm f) p 1
definition Prod (s : finset A) (f : A → B) : B :=
quot.lift_on s
(λ l, Prodl (elt_of l) f)
(λ l₁ l₂ p, Prodl_eq_Prodl_of_perm f p)
-- ∏ x ∈ s, f x
notation `∏` binders `∈` s, r:(scoped f, prod s f) := r
theorem Prod_empty (f : A → B) : Prod ∅ f = 1 :=
Prodl_nil f
theorem Prod_mul (s : finset A) (f g : A → B) : Prod s (λx, f x * g x) = Prod s f * Prod s g :=
quot.induction_on s (take u, !Prodl_mul)
section deceqA
include deceqA
theorem Prod_insert_of_mem (f : A → B) {a : A} {s : finset A} :
a ∈ s → Prod (insert a s) f = Prod s f :=
quot.induction_on s
(λ l ainl, Prodl_insert_of_mem f ainl)
theorem Prod_insert_of_not_mem (f : A → B) {a : A} {s : finset A} :
a ∉ s → Prod (insert a s) f = f a * Prod s f :=
quot.induction_on s
(λ l nainl, Prodl_insert_of_not_mem f nainl)
theorem Prod_union (f : A → B) {s₁ s₂ : finset A} (disj : s₁ ∩ s₂ = ∅) :
Prod (s₁ ∪ s₂) f = Prod s₁ f * Prod s₂ f :=
have H1 : disjoint s₁ s₂ → Prod (s₁ ∪ s₂) f = Prod s₁ f * Prod s₂ f, from
quot.induction_on₂ s₁ s₂
(λ l₁ l₂ d, Prodl_union f d),
H1 (disjoint_of_inter_eq_empty disj)
theorem Prod_ext {s : finset A} {f g : A → B} :
(∀{x}, x ∈ s → f x = g x) → Prod s f = Prod s g :=
finset.induction_on s
(assume H, rfl)
(take x s', assume H1 : x ∉ s',
assume IH : (∀ {x : A}, x ∈ s' → f x = g x) → Prod s' f = Prod s' g,
assume H2 : ∀{y}, y ∈ insert x s' → f y = g y,
assert H3 : ∀y, y ∈ s' → f y = g y, from
take y, assume H', H2 (mem_insert_of_mem _ H'),
assert H4 : f x = g x, from H2 !mem_insert,
by rewrite [Prod_insert_of_not_mem f H1, Prod_insert_of_not_mem g H1, IH H3, H4])
end deceqA
theorem Prod_one (s : finset A) : Prod s (λ x, 1) = (1:B) :=
quot.induction_on s (take u, !Prodl_one)
end comm_monoid
section add_monoid
variable [amB : add_monoid B]
include amB
local attribute add_monoid.to_monoid [trans-instance]
definition Suml (l : list A) (f : A → B) : B := Prodl l f
-- ∑ x ← l, f x
notation `∑` binders `←` l, r:(scoped f, Suml l f) := r
theorem Suml_nil (f : A → B) : Suml [] f = 0 := Prodl_nil f
theorem Suml_cons (f : A → B) (a : A) (l : list A) : Suml (a::l) f = f a + Suml l f :=
Prodl_cons f a l
theorem Suml_append (l₁ l₂ : list A) (f : A → B) : Suml (l₁++l₂) f = Suml l₁ f + Suml l₂ f :=
Prodl_append l₁ l₂ f
section deceqA
include deceqA
theorem Suml_insert_of_mem (f : A → B) {a : A} {l : list A} (H : a ∈ l) :
Suml (insert a l) f = Suml l f := Prodl_insert_of_mem f H
theorem Suml_insert_of_not_mem (f : A → B) {a : A} {l : list A} (H : a ∉ l) :
Suml (insert a l) f = f a + Suml l f := Prodl_insert_of_not_mem f H
theorem Suml_union {l₁ l₂ : list A} (f : A → B) (d : disjoint l₁ l₂) :
Suml (union l₁ l₂) f = Suml l₁ f + Suml l₂ f := Prodl_union f d
end deceqA
theorem Suml_zero (l : list A) : Suml l (λ x, 0) = (0:B) := Prodl_one l
end add_monoid
section add_comm_monoid
variable [acmB : add_comm_monoid B]
include acmB
local attribute add_comm_monoid.to_comm_monoid [trans-instance]
theorem Suml_add (l : list A) (f g : A → B) : Suml l (λx, f x + g x) = Suml l f + Suml l g :=
Prodl_mul l f g
end add_comm_monoid
/- Sum -/
section add_comm_monoid
variable [acmB : add_comm_monoid B]
include acmB
local attribute add_comm_monoid.to_comm_monoid [trans-instance]
definition Sum (s : finset A) (f : A → B) : B := Prod s f
-- ∑ x ∈ s, f x
notation `∑` binders `∈` s, r:(scoped f, Sum s f) := r
theorem Sum_empty (f : A → B) : Sum ∅ f = 0 := Prod_empty f
theorem Sum_add (s : finset A) (f g : A → B) :
Sum s (λx, f x + g x) = Sum s f + Sum s g := Prod_mul s f g
section deceqA
include deceqA
theorem Sum_insert_of_mem (f : A → B) {a : A} {s : finset A} (H : a ∈ s) :
Sum (insert a s) f = Sum s f := Prod_insert_of_mem f H
theorem Sum_insert_of_not_mem (f : A → B) {a : A} {s : finset A} (H : a ∉ s) :
Sum (insert a s) f = f a + Sum s f := Prod_insert_of_not_mem f H
theorem Sum_union (f : A → B) {s₁ s₂ : finset A} (disj : s₁ ∩ s₂ = ∅) :
Sum (s₁ ∪ s₂) f = Sum s₁ f + Sum s₂ f := Prod_union f disj
theorem Sum_ext {s : finset A} {f g : A → B} (H : ∀x, x ∈ s → f x = g x) :
Sum s f = Sum s g := Prod_ext H
end deceqA
theorem Sum_zero (s : finset A) : Sum s (λ x, 0) = (0:B) := Prod_one s
end add_comm_monoid
end algebra
|
93a0fd19e96d81a4079fdaddffd76b2eb0689f1a | 3dd1b66af77106badae6edb1c4dea91a146ead30 | /tests/lean/run/t4.lean | 68c6fb3ff6786dc6b5078e6d262c95baca481f6d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | silky/lean | 79c20c15c93feef47bb659a2cc139b26f3614642 | df8b88dca2f8da1a422cb618cd476ef5be730546 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,737,587,697 | 1,406,574,534,000 | 1,406,574,534,000 | 22,362,176 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 210 | lean | namespace foo
definition f.{l} (A : Type.{l}) : Type.{l} := A
check f.{1}
end
variable N : Type.{1}
section
parameter A : Type
definition g (a : A) (B : Type) : A := a
check g.{2}
end
check g.{2 3}
|
08813c592717d1551148c2fa1cec73a77c5dd719 | aa3f8992ef7806974bc1ffd468baa0c79f4d6643 | /library/algebra/category/adjoint.lean | fb858f2ae2efb88b4478835917aad5b9f324e51f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | codyroux/lean | 7f8dff750722c5382bdd0a9a9275dc4bb2c58dd3 | 0cca265db19f7296531e339192e9b9bae4a31f8b | refs/heads/master | 1,610,909,964,159 | 1,407,084,399,000 | 1,416,857,075,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,354 | lean | -- Copyright (c) 2014 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
-- Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-- Author: Floris van Doorn
import .constructions
open eq eq.ops category functor natural_transformation category.ops prod category.product
namespace adjoint
--representable functor
definition foo (C : Category) : C ×c C ⇒ C ×c C := functor.id
-- definition Hom (C : Category) : Cᵒᵖ ×c C ⇒ type :=
-- functor.mk (λ a, hom (pr1 a) (pr2 a))
-- (λ a b f h, pr2 f ∘ h ∘ pr1 f)
-- (λ a, funext (λh, !id_left ⬝ !id_right))
-- (λ a b c g f, funext (λh,
-- show (pr2 g ∘ pr2 f) ∘ h ∘ (pr1 f ∘ pr1 g) = pr2 g ∘ (pr2 f ∘ h ∘ pr1 f) ∘ pr1 g, from sorry))
--I'm lazy, waiting for automation to fill this
variables (C D : Category)
-- private definition aux_prod_cat [instance] : category (obD × obD) := prod_category (opposite.opposite D) D
-- definition adjoint.{l} (F : C ⇒ D) (G : D ⇒ C) :=
-- --@natural_transformation _ Type.{l} (Dᵒᵖ ×c D) type_category.{l+1} (Hom D) (Hom D)
-- sorry
--(@functor.compose _ _ _ _ _ _ (Hom D) (@product.prod_functor _ _ _ _ _ _ (Dᵒᵖ) D sorry sorry))
--(Hom C ∘f sorry)
--product.prod_functor (opposite.opposite_functor F) (functor.ID D)
end adjoint
|
1d7f293e96a6b9c524b21f3666b6aa297eecd427 | 0533ebfa09b11cf8a29da118dd1b86b94949511e | /src/dirichlet_eta.lean | 35e945b58703fe5cbc4c26e89fcb3c28b062e37d | [
"MIT"
] | permissive | wudcscheme/Lean-RH | 89e9055aac68703876e750c23fb5327979a09822 | 870f78cc7c0715d03466d1211b0f032b425ec984 | refs/heads/main | 1,679,188,429,923 | 1,602,701,790,000 | 1,602,701,790,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 13,926 | lean | /- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- -|
| @project: riemann_hypothesis |
| @file: dirichlet_eta.lean |
| @author: Brandon H. Gomes and Alex Kontorovich |
| @affil: Rutgers University |
|- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- -/
import .complex
import .riemann_zeta
/-!
-/
namespace riemann_hypothesis --——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————--
variables {ℂ : Type*} {ℝ : Type*}
[has_lift_t nat ℝ] [has_lift_t ℝ ℂ] [preorder ℝ] [Algebra ℝ] [Algebra ℂ]
(ℭ : Complex ℂ ℝ)
namespace dirichlet_eta --———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————--
open algebra
/--
-/
def term_pair
[has_lift_zero_same nat ℝ]
[has_lift_lt_comm nat ℝ]
(s n)
:= riemann_zeta.term ℭ.pow s (2 * n) - riemann_zeta.term ℭ.pow s (2 * n).succ
namespace term_pair --———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————--
/--
-/
def riemann_zeta_bound (s)
:= ↑4 * ℭ.real_exp (ℭ.abs s) + ↑3 * ℭ.abs s
namespace riemann_zeta_bound --——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————--
variables [has_zero_mul_is_zero ℝ] [has_nonneg_mul_nonneg_is_nonneg ℝ]
[has_lt_add_of_le_of_pos ℝ] [has_lt_pos_mul_preserves_right ℝ]
[has_lift_zero_same nat ℝ] [has_lift_one_same nat ℝ]
[has_lift_add_comm nat ℝ] [has_lift_lt_comm nat ℝ]
/--
-/
def positive (s)
: 0 < riemann_zeta_bound ℭ s :=
begin
refine has_lt_add_of_le_of_pos.lt _
(has_nonneg_mul_nonneg_is_nonneg.le
(le_of_lt (nat.lift.succ_pos ℝ _)) (ℭ.abs_nonneg _)),
let four_exponentials_are_positive
:= has_lt_pos_mul_preserves_right.lt
(ℭ.real_explog.exp_positive _) (nat.lift.succ_pos ℝ _),
rw has_zero_mul_is_zero.eq at four_exponentials_are_positive,
refine four_exponentials_are_positive,
end
/--
-/
def abs_positive
(ge_zero_to_abs : Π z, 0 ≤ z → ℭ.abs ↑z = z)
(s)
: 0 < ℭ.abs ↑(riemann_zeta_bound ℭ s) :=
begin
rw ge_zero_to_abs _ (le_of_lt (positive ℭ _)),
refine positive ℭ _,
end
end riemann_zeta_bound --————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————--
/--
-/
def bounded_by_riemann_zeta
[has_add_le_add ℝ]
[has_inv_mul_reverse ℝ]
[has_inv_mul_right_cancel_self ℝ]
[has_inv_reverses_le ℝ]
[has_le_nonneg_mul_preserves_left ℝ]
[has_le_nonneg_mul_preserves_right ℝ]
[has_le_pos_mul_preserves_left ℝ]
[has_le_pos_mul_preserves_right ℝ]
[has_left_add_distributivity ℝ]
[has_left_sub_distributivity ℝ]
[has_left_unit ℝ]
[has_lt_add_of_le_of_pos ℝ]
[has_lt_pos_mul_preserves_right ℝ]
[has_mul_assoc ℝ]
[has_nonneg_mul_nonneg_is_nonneg ℝ]
[has_right_add_distributivity ℝ]
[has_right_inv_pos_lt ℝ]
[has_right_sub_distributivity ℝ]
[has_right_unit ℝ]
[has_squared_le_monotonic ℝ]
[has_zero_mul_is_zero ℝ]
[has_mul_zero_is_zero ℝ]
[has_zero_right_add_cancel ℝ]
[has_zero_sub_is_neg ℝ]
[has_mul_pos ℝ]
[has_inv_pos ℝ]
[has_lift_add_comm nat ℝ]
[has_lift_le_comm nat ℝ]
[has_lift_lt_comm nat ℝ]
[has_lift_ne_comm nat ℝ]
[has_lift_sub_comm nat ℝ]
[has_lift_one_same nat ℝ]
[has_lift_zero_same nat ℝ]
[has_add_sub_assoc ℂ]
[has_inv_mul_left_cancel_self ℂ]
[has_left_sub_distributivity ℂ]
[has_left_unit ℂ]
[has_mul_assoc ℂ]
[has_right_sub_distributivity ℂ]
[has_right_unit ℂ]
[has_sub_add_sub_cancel ℂ]
[has_sub_self_is_zero ℂ]
[has_mul_zero_is_zero ℂ]
[has_zero_right_add_cancel ℂ]
[has_zero_sub_is_neg ℂ]
[has_lift_sub_comm ℝ ℂ]
(abs_mul : Π a b, ℭ.abs (a * b) = ℭ.abs (a) * ℭ.abs (b))
(abs_sub : Π a b, ℭ.abs (a - b) = ℭ.abs (b - a))
(abs_inv : Π z, ℭ.abs (z⁻¹) = (ℭ.abs z)⁻¹)
(abs_add : Π a b, ℭ.abs (a + b) ≤ ℭ.abs a + ℭ.abs b)
(ge_zero_to_abs : Π x, 0 ≤ x → ℭ.abs ↑x = x)
(s n)
: ℭ.abs (term_pair ℭ s n)
≤ riemann_zeta.term.on_reals ℭ.real_explog (1 + ℭ.real_part s) (2 * n)
* riemann_zeta_bound ℭ s :=
begin
rw [term_pair, riemann_zeta.term.on_reals],
rw [riemann_zeta.term, riemann_zeta.term, riemann_zeta.term],
rw [← has_zero_sub_is_neg.eq, ← has_zero_sub_is_neg.eq],
rw ExpLog.pow_neg_exponent_inverts,
rw ExpLog.pow_homomorphism,
rw has_inv_mul_reverse.eq,
rw ℭ.real_explog.pow_id_at_one _ (nat.lift.succ_pos ℝ _),
rw Complex.pow_neg_exponent_inverts,
rw Complex.pow_neg_exponent_inverts,
rw inv_sub_inv_lemma' (ℭ.pow_nonzero _ _ _),
rw abs_mul,
rw abs_inv,
rw Complex.abs_pow_is_real_pow,
rw has_mul_assoc.eq,
rw ← ExpLog.pow_neg_exponent_inverts,
let K := (↑(2 * n).succ.succ : ℝ),
have Kinv_ge_zero : K⁻¹ ≥ 0,
{
let ineq
:= has_right_inv_pos_lt.lt
(nat.lift.succ_pos ℝ _) (nat.lift.zero_lt_one ℝ),
rw [has_zero_mul_is_zero.eq, has_left_unit.eq] at ineq,
refine le_of_lt ineq,
},
let remove_abs
:= ge_zero_to_abs _ Kinv_ge_zero,
refine has_le_pos_mul_preserves_left.le
(ℭ.real_explog.pow_positivity _ (nat.lift.succ_pos ℝ _) _) _,
rw [Complex.pow, Complex.pow],
rw ← Complex.exp_homomorphism_inv,
rw ← has_right_sub_distributivity.eq,
rw ← has_lift_sub_comm.eq,
rw ← ℭ.real_explog.log_homomorphism_inv
(nat.lift.succ_pos ℝ _) (nat.lift.succ_pos ℝ _),
rw ← Complex.pow,
rw ℭ.pow_domain_irrel
(↑((2 * n).succ) * (↑((2 * n).succ.succ))⁻¹) _
(1 - (↑(2 * n).succ.succ)⁻¹) _
_ (by rw mul_inv_add_one_lemma),
refine le_trans _
(has_le_pos_mul_preserves_right.le (riemann_zeta_bound.positive _ _)
(has_inv_reverses_le.le (le_of_lt (has_lift_lt_comm.lt
(nat.lt_succ_self _))))),
rw ← mul_inv_add_one_lemma,
refine has_mul_pos.lt
(nat.lift.succ_pos ℝ _)
(has_inv_pos.lt (nat.lift.succ_pos ℝ _)),
rw abs_sub,
rw riemann_zeta_bound,
rw has_left_add_distributivity.eq,
refine le_trans (Complex.one_minus_pow_bound _ _ _ abs_mul abs_add _ _ _ _) _,
rw two_is_lifted_two_lemma nat ℝ,
refine nat.lift.succ_pos ℝ _,
rw two_is_lifted_two_lemma nat ℝ,
rw one_is_lifted_one_lemma nat ℝ,
refine has_lift_le_comm.le (le_of_lt (nat.lt_succ_self _)),
rw remove_abs,
rw two_is_lifted_two_lemma nat ℝ,
refine has_inv_reverses_le.le
(has_lift_le_comm.le (nat.smallest_positive_even _)),
rw remove_abs,
rw ← has_left_add_distributivity.eq,
rw four_is_lifted_four_lemma nat ℝ,
rw ← two_mul_lemma,
refine has_le_nonneg_mul_preserves_left.le
Kinv_ge_zero
(has_add_le_add.le
(le_refl _) (has_le_nonneg_mul_preserves_right.le (ℭ.abs_nonneg _) _)),
rw two_is_lifted_two_lemma nat ℝ,
refine has_lift_le_comm.le (le_of_lt (nat.lt_succ_self _)),
end
end term_pair --—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————--
/--
-/
def partial_pairs
[has_lift_lt_comm nat ℝ]
[has_lift_zero_same nat ℝ]
(s)
:= partial_sum (term_pair ℭ s)
/--
-/
def partial_pairs.is_cauchy
[has_add_le_add ℝ]
[has_add_left_lt ℝ]
[has_add_lt_add ℝ]
[has_add_nonneg ℝ]
[has_add_sub_assoc ℝ]
[has_add_sub_exchange ℝ]
[has_inv_mul_left_cancel_self ℝ]
[has_inv_mul_reverse ℝ]
[has_inv_mul_right_cancel_self ℝ]
[has_inv_reverses_le ℝ]
[has_inv_reverses_lt ℝ]
[has_inv_right_mul_lt_pos ℝ]
[has_le_add_of_nonneg_of_le ℝ]
[has_le_nonneg_mul_preserves_left ℝ]
[has_le_nonneg_mul_preserves_right ℝ]
[has_le_pos_mul_preserves_left ℝ]
[has_le_pos_mul_preserves_right ℝ]
[has_le_sub_add_le ℝ]
[has_left_add_distributivity ℝ]
[has_left_mul_inv_lt_neg ℝ]
[has_left_mul_inv_lt_pos ℝ]
[has_left_sub_distributivity ℝ]
[has_left_unit ℝ]
[has_lt_add_of_le_of_pos ℝ]
[has_lt_pos_mul_preserves_right ℝ]
[has_lt_sub_neg ℝ]
[has_mul_assoc ℝ]
[has_nonneg_mul_nonneg_is_nonneg ℝ]
[has_pos_mul_neg_is_neg ℝ]
[has_right_add_distributivity ℝ]
[has_right_inv_pos_lt ℝ]
[has_right_sub_distributivity ℝ]
[has_right_unit ℝ]
[has_squared_le_monotonic ℝ]
[has_sub_add_sub_cancel ℝ]
[has_sub_self_is_zero ℝ]
[has_sub_ne_zero_of_ne ℝ]
[has_sub_sub ℝ]
[has_zero_mul_is_zero ℝ]
[has_mul_zero_is_zero ℝ]
[has_zero_left_add_cancel ℝ]
[has_zero_right_add_cancel ℝ]
[has_zero_sub_is_neg ℝ]
[has_mul_pos ℝ]
[has_inv_pos ℝ]
[has_sub_pos ℝ]
[has_lift_zero_same nat ℝ]
[has_lift_one_same nat ℝ]
[has_lift_add_comm nat ℝ]
[has_lift_mul_comm nat ℝ]
[has_lift_sub_comm nat ℝ]
[has_lift_le_comm nat ℝ]
[has_lift_lt_comm nat ℝ]
[has_lift_ne_comm nat ℝ]
[has_add_sub_assoc ℂ]
[has_inv_mul_left_cancel_self ℂ]
[has_left_sub_distributivity ℂ]
[has_left_unit ℂ]
[has_mul_assoc ℂ]
[has_right_sub_distributivity ℂ]
[has_right_unit ℂ]
[has_sub_add_sub_cancel ℂ]
[has_sub_self_is_zero ℂ]
[has_mul_zero_is_zero ℂ]
[has_zero_right_add_cancel ℂ]
[has_zero_sub_is_neg ℂ]
[has_lift_zero_same ℝ ℂ]
[has_lift_one_same ℝ ℂ]
[has_lift_add_comm ℝ ℂ]
[has_lift_sub_comm ℝ ℂ]
[has_lift_mul_comm ℝ ℂ]
[has_lift_inv_comm ℝ ℂ]
(abs_zero abs_one)
(abs_add : Π w z, ℭ.abs (w + z) ≤ ℭ.abs w + ℭ.abs z)
(abs_sub : Π w z, ℭ.abs (w - z) = ℭ.abs (z - w))
(abs_mul : Π w z, ℭ.abs (w * z) = ℭ.abs w * ℭ.abs z)
(abs_inv : Π z, ℭ.abs (z⁻¹) = (ℭ.abs z)⁻¹)
(abs_ge_zero)
(pos_to_absℝ abs_monoℝ)
(half ceil)
(s) (σpos : 0 < ℭ.real_part s)
: is_cauchy ℭ.abs (partial_pairs ℭ s) :=
begin
let one_plus_σ_gt_one := has_add_left_lt.lt _ _ 1 σpos,
rw has_zero_right_add_cancel.eq at one_plus_σ_gt_one,
have abs_zeroℝ : ℭ.abs ↑(0 : ℝ) = 0,
rw has_lift_zero_same.eq,
refine abs_zero,
have abs_oneℝ : ℭ.abs ↑(1 : ℝ) = 1,
rw has_lift_one_same.eq,
refine abs_one,
have abs_addℝ : Π x y : ℝ, ℭ.abs ↑(x + y) ≤ ℭ.abs ↑x + ℭ.abs ↑y,
intros,
rw has_lift_add_comm.eq,
refine abs_add _ _,
have abs_subℝ : Π x y : ℝ, ℭ.abs ↑(x - y) = ℭ.abs ↑(y - x),
intros,
rw [has_lift_sub_comm.eq, has_lift_sub_comm.eq],
refine abs_sub _ _,
have abs_mulℝ : Π x y : ℝ, ℭ.abs ↑(x * y) = ℭ.abs ↑x * ℭ.abs ↑y,
intros,
rw has_lift_mul_comm.eq,
refine abs_mul _ _,
have abs_invℝ : Π x : ℝ, ℭ.abs ↑(x⁻¹) = (ℭ.abs ↑x)⁻¹,
intros,
rw has_lift_inv_comm.eq,
refine abs_inv _,
refine is_cauchy.comparison _ pos_to_absℝ _ abs_zero abs_add abs_ge_zero _ _
(term_pair.bounded_by_riemann_zeta _
abs_mul abs_sub abs_inv abs_add pos_to_absℝ _)
(is_cauchy.closed.partial_sum_right_mul _ abs_mulℝ _ _
(term_pair.riemann_zeta_bound.abs_positive _ pos_to_absℝ _)
(is_cauchy.closed.scaled_sequence_partial_sum _ abs_monoℝ _
(riemann_zeta.term.on_reals.nonneg _ _) _ (nat.zero_lt_one_add _)
(riemann_zeta.partial.on_reals.is_cauchy _ _
abs_zeroℝ abs_oneℝ abs_addℝ abs_subℝ abs_mulℝ abs_invℝ
(λ _, abs_ge_zero _) pos_to_absℝ
half ceil _
one_plus_σ_gt_one))),
end
end dirichlet_eta --—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————--
end riemann_hypothesis --————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————--
|
ba83dfd2524d5d486d71776ba596e1059d881b0c | bb31430994044506fa42fd667e2d556327e18dfe | /src/topology/algebra/ring.lean | 8b5d89f91bb39e278e029876f3be631e58a4bea3 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | sgouezel/mathlib | 0cb4e5335a2ba189fa7af96d83a377f83270e503 | 00638177efd1b2534fc5269363ebf42a7871df9a | refs/heads/master | 1,674,527,483,042 | 1,673,665,568,000 | 1,673,665,568,000 | 119,598,202 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,517,348,647,000 | 1,517,348,646,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 20,140 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import algebra.ring.prod
import ring_theory.ideal.quotient
import ring_theory.subring.basic
import topology.algebra.group.basic
/-!
# Topological (semi)rings
A topological (semi)ring is a (semi)ring equipped with a topology such that all operations are
continuous. Besides this definition, this file proves that the topological closure of a subring
(resp. an ideal) is a subring (resp. an ideal) and defines products and quotients
of topological (semi)rings.
## Main Results
- `subring.topological_closure`/`subsemiring.topological_closure`: the topological closure of a
`subring`/`subsemiring` is itself a `sub(semi)ring`.
- `prod.topological_semiring`/`prod.topological_ring`: The product of two topological
(semi)rings.
- `pi.topological_semiring`/`pi.topological_ring`: The arbitrary product of topological
(semi)rings.
- `ideal.closure`: The closure of an ideal is an ideal.
- `topological_ring_quotient`: The quotient of a topological semiring by an ideal is a
topological ring.
-/
open classical set filter topological_space function
open_locale classical topological_space filter
section topological_semiring
variables (α : Type*)
/-- a topological semiring is a semiring `R` where addition and multiplication are continuous.
We allow for non-unital and non-associative semirings as well.
The `topological_semiring` class should *only* be instantiated in the presence of a
`non_unital_non_assoc_semiring` instance; if there is an instance of `non_unital_non_assoc_ring`,
then `topological_ring` should be used. Note: in the presence of `non_assoc_ring`, these classes are
mathematically equivalent (see `topological_semiring.has_continuous_neg_of_mul` or
`topological_semiring.to_topological_ring`). -/
class topological_semiring [topological_space α] [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring α]
extends has_continuous_add α, has_continuous_mul α : Prop
/-- A topological ring is a ring `R` where addition, multiplication and negation are continuous.
If `R` is a (unital) ring, then continuity of negation can be derived from continuity of
multiplication as it is multiplication with `-1`. (See
`topological_semiring.has_continuous_neg_of_mul` and
`topological_semiring.to_topological_add_group`) -/
class topological_ring [topological_space α] [non_unital_non_assoc_ring α]
extends topological_semiring α, has_continuous_neg α : Prop
variables {α}
/-- If `R` is a ring with a continuous multiplication, then negation is continuous as well since it
is just multiplication with `-1`. -/
lemma topological_semiring.has_continuous_neg_of_mul [topological_space α] [non_assoc_ring α]
[has_continuous_mul α] : has_continuous_neg α :=
{ continuous_neg :=
by simpa using (continuous_const.mul continuous_id : continuous (λ x : α, (-1) * x)) }
/-- If `R` is a ring which is a topological semiring, then it is automatically a topological
ring. This exists so that one can place a topological ring structure on `R` without explicitly
proving `continuous_neg`. -/
lemma topological_semiring.to_topological_ring [topological_space α] [non_assoc_ring α]
(h : topological_semiring α) : topological_ring α :=
{ ..h,
..(by { haveI := h.to_has_continuous_mul,
exact topological_semiring.has_continuous_neg_of_mul } : has_continuous_neg α) }
@[priority 100] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance topological_ring.to_topological_add_group [non_unital_non_assoc_ring α]
[topological_space α] [topological_ring α] : topological_add_group α :=
{ ..topological_ring.to_topological_semiring.to_has_continuous_add,
..topological_ring.to_has_continuous_neg }
@[priority 50]
instance discrete_topology.topological_semiring [topological_space α]
[non_unital_non_assoc_semiring α] [discrete_topology α] : topological_semiring α := ⟨⟩
@[priority 50]
instance discrete_topology.topological_ring [topological_space α]
[non_unital_non_assoc_ring α] [discrete_topology α] : topological_ring α := ⟨⟩
section
variables [topological_space α] [semiring α] [topological_semiring α]
namespace subsemiring
instance (S : subsemiring α) :
topological_semiring S :=
{ ..S.to_submonoid.has_continuous_mul,
..S.to_add_submonoid.has_continuous_add }
end subsemiring
/-- The (topological-space) closure of a subsemiring of a topological semiring is
itself a subsemiring. -/
def subsemiring.topological_closure (s : subsemiring α) : subsemiring α :=
{ carrier := closure (s : set α),
..(s.to_submonoid.topological_closure),
..(s.to_add_submonoid.topological_closure ) }
@[simp] lemma subsemiring.topological_closure_coe (s : subsemiring α) :
(s.topological_closure : set α) = closure (s : set α) :=
rfl
lemma subsemiring.le_topological_closure (s : subsemiring α) :
s ≤ s.topological_closure :=
subset_closure
lemma subsemiring.is_closed_topological_closure (s : subsemiring α) :
is_closed (s.topological_closure : set α) :=
by convert is_closed_closure
lemma subsemiring.topological_closure_minimal
(s : subsemiring α) {t : subsemiring α} (h : s ≤ t) (ht : is_closed (t : set α)) :
s.topological_closure ≤ t :=
closure_minimal h ht
/-- If a subsemiring of a topological semiring is commutative, then so is its
topological closure. -/
def subsemiring.comm_semiring_topological_closure [t2_space α] (s : subsemiring α)
(hs : ∀ (x y : s), x * y = y * x) : comm_semiring s.topological_closure :=
{ ..s.topological_closure.to_semiring,
..s.to_submonoid.comm_monoid_topological_closure hs }
end
section
variables {β : Type*} [topological_space α] [topological_space β]
/-- The product topology on the cartesian product of two topological semirings
makes the product into a topological semiring. -/
instance [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring α] [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring β]
[topological_semiring α] [topological_semiring β] : topological_semiring (α × β) := {}
/-- The product topology on the cartesian product of two topological rings
makes the product into a topological ring. -/
instance [non_unital_non_assoc_ring α] [non_unital_non_assoc_ring β]
[topological_ring α] [topological_ring β] : topological_ring (α × β) := {}
end
instance {β : Type*} {C : β → Type*} [∀ b, topological_space (C b)]
[Π b, non_unital_non_assoc_semiring (C b)]
[Π b, topological_semiring (C b)] : topological_semiring (Π b, C b) := {}
instance {β : Type*} {C : β → Type*} [∀ b, topological_space (C b)]
[Π b, non_unital_non_assoc_ring (C b)]
[Π b, topological_ring (C b)] : topological_ring (Π b, C b) := {}
section mul_opposite
open mul_opposite
instance [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring α] [topological_space α] [has_continuous_add α] :
has_continuous_add αᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ continuous_add := continuous_induced_rng.2 $ (@continuous_add α _ _ _).comp
(continuous_unop.prod_map continuous_unop) }
instance [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring α] [topological_space α] [topological_semiring α] :
topological_semiring αᵐᵒᵖ := {}
instance [non_unital_non_assoc_ring α] [topological_space α] [has_continuous_neg α] :
has_continuous_neg αᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ continuous_neg := continuous_induced_rng.2 $ (@continuous_neg α _ _ _).comp continuous_unop }
instance [non_unital_non_assoc_ring α] [topological_space α] [topological_ring α] :
topological_ring αᵐᵒᵖ := {}
end mul_opposite
section add_opposite
open add_opposite
instance [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring α] [topological_space α] [has_continuous_mul α] :
has_continuous_mul αᵃᵒᵖ :=
{ continuous_mul := by convert
(continuous_op.comp $ (@continuous_mul α _ _ _).comp $ continuous_unop.prod_map continuous_unop) }
instance [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring α] [topological_space α] [topological_semiring α] :
topological_semiring αᵃᵒᵖ := {}
instance [non_unital_non_assoc_ring α] [topological_space α] [topological_ring α] :
topological_ring αᵃᵒᵖ := {}
end add_opposite
section
variables {R : Type*} [non_unital_non_assoc_ring R] [topological_space R]
lemma topological_ring.of_add_group_of_nhds_zero [topological_add_group R]
(hmul : tendsto (uncurry ((*) : R → R → R)) ((𝓝 0) ×ᶠ (𝓝 0)) $ 𝓝 0)
(hmul_left : ∀ (x₀ : R), tendsto (λ x : R, x₀ * x) (𝓝 0) $ 𝓝 0)
(hmul_right : ∀ (x₀ : R), tendsto (λ x : R, x * x₀) (𝓝 0) $ 𝓝 0) : topological_ring R :=
begin
refine {..‹topological_add_group R›, ..},
have hleft : ∀ x₀ : R, 𝓝 x₀ = map (λ x, x₀ + x) (𝓝 0), by simp,
have hadd : tendsto (uncurry ((+) : R → R → R)) ((𝓝 0) ×ᶠ (𝓝 0)) (𝓝 0),
{ rw ← nhds_prod_eq,
convert continuous_add.tendsto ((0 : R), (0 : R)),
rw zero_add },
rw continuous_iff_continuous_at,
rintro ⟨x₀, y₀⟩,
rw [continuous_at, nhds_prod_eq, hleft x₀, hleft y₀, hleft (x₀*y₀), filter.prod_map_map_eq,
tendsto_map'_iff],
suffices :
tendsto ((λ (x : R), x + x₀ * y₀) ∘ (λ (p : R × R), p.1 + p.2) ∘
(λ (p : R × R), (p.1*y₀ + x₀*p.2, p.1*p.2)))
((𝓝 0) ×ᶠ (𝓝 0)) (map (λ (x : R), x + x₀ * y₀) $ 𝓝 0),
{ convert this using 1,
{ ext, simp only [comp_app, mul_add, add_mul], abel },
{ simp only [add_comm] } },
refine tendsto_map.comp (hadd.comp (tendsto.prod_mk _ hmul)),
exact hadd.comp (((hmul_right y₀).comp tendsto_fst).prod_mk ((hmul_left x₀).comp tendsto_snd))
end
lemma topological_ring.of_nhds_zero
(hadd : tendsto (uncurry ((+) : R → R → R)) ((𝓝 0) ×ᶠ (𝓝 0)) $ 𝓝 0)
(hneg : tendsto (λ x, -x : R → R) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0))
(hmul : tendsto (uncurry ((*) : R → R → R)) ((𝓝 0) ×ᶠ (𝓝 0)) $ 𝓝 0)
(hmul_left : ∀ (x₀ : R), tendsto (λ x : R, x₀ * x) (𝓝 0) $ 𝓝 0)
(hmul_right : ∀ (x₀ : R), tendsto (λ x : R, x * x₀) (𝓝 0) $ 𝓝 0)
(hleft : ∀ x₀ : R, 𝓝 x₀ = map (λ x, x₀ + x) (𝓝 0)) : topological_ring R :=
begin
haveI := topological_add_group.of_comm_of_nhds_zero hadd hneg hleft,
exact topological_ring.of_add_group_of_nhds_zero hmul hmul_left hmul_right
end
end
variables {α} [topological_space α]
section
variables [non_unital_non_assoc_ring α] [topological_ring α]
/-- In a topological semiring, the left-multiplication `add_monoid_hom` is continuous. -/
lemma mul_left_continuous (x : α) : continuous (add_monoid_hom.mul_left x) :=
continuous_const.mul continuous_id
/-- In a topological semiring, the right-multiplication `add_monoid_hom` is continuous. -/
lemma mul_right_continuous (x : α) : continuous (add_monoid_hom.mul_right x) :=
continuous_id.mul continuous_const
end
variables [ring α] [topological_ring α]
namespace subring
instance (S : subring α) :
topological_ring S :=
topological_semiring.to_topological_ring S.to_subsemiring.topological_semiring
end subring
/-- The (topological-space) closure of a subring of a topological ring is
itself a subring. -/
def subring.topological_closure (S : subring α) : subring α :=
{ carrier := closure (S : set α),
..S.to_submonoid.topological_closure,
..S.to_add_subgroup.topological_closure }
lemma subring.le_topological_closure (s : subring α) :
s ≤ s.topological_closure := subset_closure
lemma subring.is_closed_topological_closure (s : subring α) :
is_closed (s.topological_closure : set α) := by convert is_closed_closure
lemma subring.topological_closure_minimal
(s : subring α) {t : subring α} (h : s ≤ t) (ht : is_closed (t : set α)) :
s.topological_closure ≤ t := closure_minimal h ht
/-- If a subring of a topological ring is commutative, then so is its topological closure. -/
def subring.comm_ring_topological_closure [t2_space α] (s : subring α)
(hs : ∀ (x y : s), x * y = y * x) : comm_ring s.topological_closure :=
{ ..s.topological_closure.to_ring,
..s.to_submonoid.comm_monoid_topological_closure hs }
end topological_semiring
section topological_ring
variables {α : Type*} [topological_space α] [ring α] [topological_ring α]
/-- The closure of an ideal in a topological ring as an ideal. -/
def ideal.closure (S : ideal α) : ideal α :=
{ carrier := closure S,
smul_mem' := λ c x hx, map_mem_closure (mul_left_continuous _) hx $ λ a, S.mul_mem_left c,
..(add_submonoid.topological_closure S.to_add_submonoid) }
@[simp] lemma ideal.coe_closure (S : ideal α) : (S.closure : set α) = closure S := rfl
@[simp] lemma ideal.closure_eq_of_is_closed (S : ideal α) [hS : is_closed (S : set α)] :
S.closure = S :=
ideal.ext $ set.ext_iff.mp hS.closure_eq
end topological_ring
section topological_ring
variables {α : Type*} [topological_space α] [comm_ring α] (N : ideal α)
open ideal.quotient
instance topological_ring_quotient_topology : topological_space (α ⧸ N) :=
show topological_space (quotient _), by apply_instance
-- note for the reader: in the following, `mk` is `ideal.quotient.mk`, the canonical map `R → R/I`.
variable [topological_ring α]
lemma quotient_ring.is_open_map_coe : is_open_map (mk N) :=
begin
intros s s_op,
change is_open (mk N ⁻¹' (mk N '' s)),
rw quotient_ring_saturate,
exact is_open_Union (λ ⟨n, _⟩, is_open_map_add_left n s s_op)
end
lemma quotient_ring.quotient_map_coe_coe : quotient_map (λ p : α × α, (mk N p.1, mk N p.2)) :=
is_open_map.to_quotient_map
((quotient_ring.is_open_map_coe N).prod (quotient_ring.is_open_map_coe N))
((continuous_quot_mk.comp continuous_fst).prod_mk (continuous_quot_mk.comp continuous_snd))
(by rintro ⟨⟨x⟩, ⟨y⟩⟩; exact ⟨(x, y), rfl⟩)
instance topological_ring_quotient : topological_ring (α ⧸ N) :=
topological_semiring.to_topological_ring
{ continuous_add :=
have cont : continuous (mk N ∘ (λ (p : α × α), p.fst + p.snd)) :=
continuous_quot_mk.comp continuous_add,
(quotient_map.continuous_iff (quotient_ring.quotient_map_coe_coe N)).mpr cont,
continuous_mul :=
have cont : continuous (mk N ∘ (λ (p : α × α), p.fst * p.snd)) :=
continuous_quot_mk.comp continuous_mul,
(quotient_map.continuous_iff (quotient_ring.quotient_map_coe_coe N)).mpr cont }
end topological_ring
/-!
### Lattice of ring topologies
We define a type class `ring_topology α` which endows a ring `α` with a topology such that all ring
operations are continuous.
Ring topologies on a fixed ring `α` are ordered, by reverse inclusion. They form a complete lattice,
with `⊥` the discrete topology and `⊤` the indiscrete topology.
Any function `f : α → β` induces `coinduced f : topological_space α → ring_topology β`. -/
universes u v
/-- A ring topology on a ring `α` is a topology for which addition, negation and multiplication
are continuous. -/
@[ext]
structure ring_topology (α : Type u) [ring α]
extends topological_space α, topological_ring α : Type u
namespace ring_topology
variables {α : Type*} [ring α]
instance inhabited {α : Type u} [ring α] : inhabited (ring_topology α) :=
⟨{to_topological_space := ⊤,
continuous_add := continuous_top,
continuous_mul := continuous_top,
continuous_neg := continuous_top}⟩
@[ext]
lemma ext' {f g : ring_topology α} (h : f.is_open = g.is_open) : f = g :=
by { ext, rw h }
/-- The ordering on ring topologies on the ring `α`.
`t ≤ s` if every set open in `s` is also open in `t` (`t` is finer than `s`). -/
instance : partial_order (ring_topology α) :=
partial_order.lift ring_topology.to_topological_space $ ext
local notation `cont` := @continuous _ _
private def def_Inf (S : set (ring_topology α)) : ring_topology α :=
let Inf_S' := Inf (to_topological_space '' S) in
{ to_topological_space := Inf_S',
continuous_add :=
begin
apply continuous_Inf_rng.2,
rintros _ ⟨⟨t, tr⟩, haS, rfl⟩, resetI,
have h := continuous_Inf_dom (set.mem_image_of_mem to_topological_space haS) continuous_id,
have h_continuous_id := @continuous.prod_map _ _ _ _ t t Inf_S' Inf_S' _ _ h h,
exact @continuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) t _ _ continuous_add h_continuous_id,
end,
continuous_mul :=
begin
apply continuous_Inf_rng.2,
rintros _ ⟨⟨t, tr⟩, haS, rfl⟩, resetI,
have h := continuous_Inf_dom (set.mem_image_of_mem to_topological_space haS) continuous_id,
have h_continuous_id := @continuous.prod_map _ _ _ _ t t Inf_S' Inf_S' _ _ h h,
exact @continuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) t _ _ continuous_mul h_continuous_id,
end,
continuous_neg :=
begin
apply continuous_Inf_rng.2,
rintros _ ⟨⟨t, tr⟩, haS, rfl⟩, resetI,
have h := continuous_Inf_dom (set.mem_image_of_mem to_topological_space haS) continuous_id,
exact @continuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) t _ _ continuous_neg h,
end }
/-- Ring topologies on `α` form a complete lattice, with `⊥` the discrete topology and `⊤` the
indiscrete topology.
The infimum of a collection of ring topologies is the topology generated by all their open sets
(which is a ring topology).
The supremum of two ring topologies `s` and `t` is the infimum of the family of all ring topologies
contained in the intersection of `s` and `t`. -/
instance : complete_semilattice_Inf (ring_topology α) :=
{ Inf := def_Inf,
Inf_le := λ S a haS, by { apply topological_space.complete_lattice.Inf_le, use [a, ⟨ haS, rfl⟩] },
le_Inf :=
begin
intros S a hab,
apply topological_space.complete_lattice.le_Inf,
rintros _ ⟨b, hbS, rfl⟩,
exact hab b hbS,
end,
..ring_topology.partial_order }
instance : complete_lattice (ring_topology α) :=
complete_lattice_of_complete_semilattice_Inf _
/-- Given `f : α → β` and a topology on `α`, the coinduced ring topology on `β` is the finest
topology such that `f` is continuous and `β` is a topological ring. -/
def coinduced {α β : Type*} [t : topological_space α] [ring β] (f : α → β) :
ring_topology β :=
Inf {b : ring_topology β | (topological_space.coinduced f t) ≤ b.to_topological_space}
lemma coinduced_continuous {α β : Type*} [t : topological_space α] [ring β] (f : α → β) :
cont t (coinduced f).to_topological_space f :=
begin
rw continuous_iff_coinduced_le,
refine le_Inf _,
rintros _ ⟨t', ht', rfl⟩,
exact ht',
end
/-- The forgetful functor from ring topologies on `a` to additive group topologies on `a`. -/
def to_add_group_topology (t : ring_topology α) : add_group_topology α :=
{ to_topological_space := t.to_topological_space,
to_topological_add_group := @topological_ring.to_topological_add_group _ _ t.to_topological_space
t.to_topological_ring }
/-- The order embedding from ring topologies on `a` to additive group topologies on `a`. -/
def to_add_group_topology.order_embedding : order_embedding (ring_topology α)
(add_group_topology α) :=
{ to_fun := λ t, t.to_add_group_topology,
inj' :=
begin
intros t₁ t₂ h_eq,
dsimp only at h_eq,
ext,
have h_t₁ : t₁.to_topological_space = t₁.to_add_group_topology.to_topological_space := rfl,
rw [h_t₁, h_eq],
refl,
end,
map_rel_iff' :=
begin
intros t₁ t₂,
rw [embedding.coe_fn_mk],
have h_le : t₁ ≤ t₂ ↔ t₁.to_topological_space ≤ t₂.to_topological_space := by refl,
rw h_le,
refl,
end }
end ring_topology
section absolute_value
/-- Construct an absolute value on a semiring `T` from an absolute value on a semiring `R`
and an injective ring homomorphism `f : T →+* R` -/
def absolute_value.comp {R S T : Type*} [semiring T] [semiring R] [ordered_semiring S]
(v : absolute_value R S) {f : T →+* R} (hf : function.injective f) :
absolute_value T S :=
{ to_fun := v ∘ f,
map_mul' := by simp only [function.comp_app, map_mul, eq_self_iff_true, forall_const],
nonneg' := by simp only [v.nonneg, forall_const],
eq_zero' := by simp only [map_eq_zero_iff f hf, v.eq_zero, forall_const, iff_self],
add_le' := by simp only [function.comp_app, map_add, v.add_le, forall_const], }
end absolute_value
|
9c350c800208e5295b0dd6802c05beaaa361a17d | ae1e94c332e17c7dc7051ce976d5a9eebe7ab8a5 | /src/Lean/Compiler/IR/Borrow.lean | 3dd885c60bdc484b7405cb924da3877589c28f56 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dupuisf/lean4 | d082d13b01243e1de29ae680eefb476961221eef | 6a39c65bd28eb0e28c3870188f348c8914502718 | refs/heads/master | 1,676,948,755,391 | 1,610,665,114,000 | 1,610,665,114,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,003 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Compiler.ExportAttr
import Lean.Compiler.IR.CompilerM
import Lean.Compiler.IR.NormIds
namespace Lean
namespace IR
namespace Borrow
namespace OwnedSet
abbrev Key := FunId × Index
def beq : Key → Key → Bool
| (f₁, x₁), (f₂, x₂) => f₁ == f₂ && x₁ == x₂
instance : BEq Key := ⟨beq⟩
def getHash : Key → USize
| (f, x) => mixHash (hash f) (hash x)
instance : Hashable Key := ⟨getHash⟩
end OwnedSet
open OwnedSet (Key) in
abbrev OwnedSet := Std.HashMap Key Unit
def OwnedSet.insert (s : OwnedSet) (k : OwnedSet.Key) : OwnedSet := Std.HashMap.insert s k ()
def OwnedSet.contains (s : OwnedSet) (k : OwnedSet.Key) : Bool := Std.HashMap.contains s k
/- We perform borrow inference in a block of mutually recursive functions.
Join points are viewed as local functions, and are identified using
their local id + the name of the surrounding function.
We keep a mapping from function and joint points to parameters (`Array Param`).
Recall that `Param` contains the field `borrow`. -/
namespace ParamMap
inductive Key where
| decl (name : FunId)
| jp (name : FunId) (jpid : JoinPointId)
deriving BEq
def getHash : Key → USize
| Key.decl n => hash n
| Key.jp n id => mixHash (hash n) (hash id)
instance : Hashable Key := ⟨getHash⟩
end ParamMap
open ParamMap (Key)
abbrev ParamMap := Std.HashMap Key (Array Param)
def ParamMap.fmt (map : ParamMap) : Format :=
let fmts := map.fold (fun fmt k ps =>
let k := match k with
| ParamMap.Key.decl n => format n
| ParamMap.Key.jp n id => format n ++ ":" ++ format id
fmt ++ Format.line ++ k ++ " -> " ++ formatParams ps)
Format.nil
"{" ++ (Format.nest 1 fmts) ++ "}"
instance : ToFormat ParamMap := ⟨ParamMap.fmt⟩
instance : ToString ParamMap := ⟨fun m => Format.pretty (format m)⟩
namespace InitParamMap
/- Mark parameters that take a reference as borrow -/
def initBorrow (ps : Array Param) : Array Param :=
ps.map $ fun p => { p with borrow := p.ty.isObj }
/- We do perform borrow inference for constants marked as `export`.
Reason: we current write wrappers in C++ for using exported functions.
These wrappers use smart pointers such as `object_ref`.
When writing a new wrapper we need to know whether an argument is a borrow
inference or not.
We can revise this decision when we implement code for generating
the wrappers automatically. -/
def initBorrowIfNotExported (exported : Bool) (ps : Array Param) : Array Param :=
if exported then ps else initBorrow ps
partial def visitFnBody (fnid : FunId) : FnBody → StateM ParamMap Unit
| FnBody.jdecl j xs v b => do
modify fun m => m.insert (ParamMap.Key.jp fnid j) (initBorrow xs)
visitFnBody fnid v
visitFnBody fnid b
| FnBody.case _ _ _ alts => alts.forM fun alt => visitFnBody fnid alt.body
| e => do
unless e.isTerminal do
let (instr, b) := e.split
visitFnBody fnid b
def visitDecls (env : Environment) (decls : Array Decl) : StateM ParamMap Unit :=
decls.forM fun decl => match decl with
| Decl.fdecl f xs _ b => do
let exported := isExport env f
modify fun m => m.insert (ParamMap.Key.decl f) (initBorrowIfNotExported exported xs)
visitFnBody f b
| _ => pure ()
end InitParamMap
def mkInitParamMap (env : Environment) (decls : Array Decl) : ParamMap :=
(InitParamMap.visitDecls env decls *> get).run' {}
/- Apply the inferred borrow annotations stored at `ParamMap` to a block of mutually
recursive functions. -/
namespace ApplyParamMap
partial def visitFnBody (fn : FunId) (paramMap : ParamMap) : FnBody → FnBody
| FnBody.jdecl j xs v b =>
let v := visitFnBody fn paramMap v
let b := visitFnBody fn paramMap b
match paramMap.find? (ParamMap.Key.jp fn j) with
| some ys => FnBody.jdecl j ys v b
| none => unreachable!
| FnBody.case tid x xType alts =>
FnBody.case tid x xType $ alts.map $ fun alt => alt.modifyBody (visitFnBody fn paramMap)
| e =>
if e.isTerminal then e
else
let (instr, b) := e.split
let b := visitFnBody fn paramMap b
instr.setBody b
def visitDecls (decls : Array Decl) (paramMap : ParamMap) : Array Decl :=
decls.map fun decl => match decl with
| Decl.fdecl f xs ty b =>
let b := visitFnBody f paramMap b
match paramMap.find? (ParamMap.Key.decl f) with
| some xs => Decl.fdecl f xs ty b
| none => unreachable!
| other => other
end ApplyParamMap
def applyParamMap (decls : Array Decl) (map : ParamMap) : Array Decl :=
-- dbgTrace ("applyParamMap " ++ toString map) $ fun _ =>
ApplyParamMap.visitDecls decls map
structure BorrowInfCtx where
env : Environment
currFn : FunId := arbitrary -- Function being analyzed.
paramSet : IndexSet := {} -- Set of all function parameters in scope. This is used to implement the heuristic at `ownArgsUsingParams`
structure BorrowInfState where
/- Set of variables that must be `owned`. -/
owned : OwnedSet := {}
modified : Bool := false
paramMap : ParamMap
abbrev M := ReaderT BorrowInfCtx (StateM BorrowInfState)
def getCurrFn : M FunId := do
let ctx ← read
pure ctx.currFn
def markModified : M Unit :=
modify fun s => { s with modified := true }
def ownVar (x : VarId) : M Unit := do
-- dbgTrace ("ownVar " ++ toString x) $ fun _ =>
let currFn ← getCurrFn
modify fun s =>
if s.owned.contains (currFn, x.idx) then s
else { s with owned := s.owned.insert (currFn, x.idx), modified := true }
def ownArg (x : Arg) : M Unit :=
match x with
| Arg.var x => ownVar x
| _ => pure ()
def ownArgs (xs : Array Arg) : M Unit :=
xs.forM ownArg
def isOwned (x : VarId) : M Bool := do
let currFn ← getCurrFn
let s ← get
pure $ s.owned.contains (currFn, x.idx)
/- Updates `map[k]` using the current set of `owned` variables. -/
def updateParamMap (k : ParamMap.Key) : M Unit := do
let currFn ← getCurrFn
let s ← get
match s.paramMap.find? k with
| some ps => do
let ps ← ps.mapM fun (p : Param) => do
if !p.borrow then pure p
else if (← isOwned p.x) then
markModified
pure { p with borrow := false }
else
pure p
modify fun s => { s with paramMap := s.paramMap.insert k ps }
| none => pure ()
def getParamInfo (k : ParamMap.Key) : M (Array Param) := do
let s ← get
match s.paramMap.find? k with
| some ps => pure ps
| none =>
match k with
| ParamMap.Key.decl fn => do
let ctx ← read
match findEnvDecl ctx.env fn with
| some decl => pure decl.params
| none => unreachable!
| _ => unreachable!
/- For each ps[i], if ps[i] is owned, then mark xs[i] as owned. -/
def ownArgsUsingParams (xs : Array Arg) (ps : Array Param) : M Unit :=
xs.size.forM fun i => do
let x := xs[i]
let p := ps[i]
unless p.borrow do ownArg x
/- For each xs[i], if xs[i] is owned, then mark ps[i] as owned.
We use this action to preserve tail calls. That is, if we have
a tail call `f xs`, if the i-th parameter is borrowed, but `xs[i]` is owned
we would have to insert a `dec xs[i]` after `f xs` and consequently
"break" the tail call. -/
def ownParamsUsingArgs (xs : Array Arg) (ps : Array Param) : M Unit :=
xs.size.forM fun i => do
let x := xs[i]
let p := ps[i]
match x with
| Arg.var x => if (← isOwned x) then ownVar p.x
| _ => pure ()
/- Mark `xs[i]` as owned if it is one of the parameters `ps`.
We use this action to mark function parameters that are being "packed" inside constructors.
This is a heuristic, and is not related with the effectiveness of the reset/reuse optimization.
It is useful for code such as
```
def f (x y : obj) :=
let z := ctor_1 x y;
ret z
``` -/
def ownArgsIfParam (xs : Array Arg) : M Unit := do
let ctx ← read
xs.forM fun x => do
match x with
| Arg.var x => if ctx.paramSet.contains x.idx then ownVar x
| _ => pure ()
def collectExpr (z : VarId) : Expr → M Unit
| Expr.reset _ x => ownVar z *> ownVar x
| Expr.reuse x _ _ ys => ownVar z *> ownVar x *> ownArgsIfParam ys
| Expr.ctor _ xs => ownVar z *> ownArgsIfParam xs
| Expr.proj _ x => do
if (← isOwned x) then ownVar z
if (← isOwned z) then ownVar x
| Expr.fap g xs => do
let ps ← getParamInfo (ParamMap.Key.decl g)
ownVar z *> ownArgsUsingParams xs ps
| Expr.ap x ys => ownVar z *> ownVar x *> ownArgs ys
| Expr.pap _ xs => ownVar z *> ownArgs xs
| other => pure ()
def preserveTailCall (x : VarId) (v : Expr) (b : FnBody) : M Unit := do
let ctx ← read
match v, b with
| (Expr.fap g ys), (FnBody.ret (Arg.var z)) =>
if ctx.currFn == g && x == z then
-- dbgTrace ("preserveTailCall " ++ toString b) $ fun _ => do
let ps ← getParamInfo (ParamMap.Key.decl g)
ownParamsUsingArgs ys ps
| _, _ => pure ()
def updateParamSet (ctx : BorrowInfCtx) (ps : Array Param) : BorrowInfCtx :=
{ ctx with paramSet := ps.foldl (fun s p => s.insert p.x.idx) ctx.paramSet }
partial def collectFnBody : FnBody → M Unit
| FnBody.jdecl j ys v b => do
withReader (fun ctx => updateParamSet ctx ys) (collectFnBody v)
let ctx ← read
updateParamMap (ParamMap.Key.jp ctx.currFn j)
collectFnBody b
| FnBody.vdecl x _ v b => collectFnBody b *> collectExpr x v *> preserveTailCall x v b
| FnBody.jmp j ys => do
let ctx ← read
let ps ← getParamInfo (ParamMap.Key.jp ctx.currFn j)
ownArgsUsingParams ys ps -- for making sure the join point can reuse
ownParamsUsingArgs ys ps -- for making sure the tail call is preserved
| FnBody.case _ _ _ alts => alts.forM fun alt => collectFnBody alt.body
| e => do unless e.isTerminal do collectFnBody e.body
partial def collectDecl : Decl → M Unit
| Decl.fdecl f ys _ b =>
withReader (fun ctx => let ctx := updateParamSet ctx ys; { ctx with currFn := f }) do
collectFnBody b
updateParamMap (ParamMap.Key.decl f)
| _ => pure ()
/- Keep executing `x` until it reaches a fixpoint -/
@[inline] partial def whileModifing (x : M Unit) : M Unit := do
modify fun s => { s with modified := false }
x
let s ← get
if s.modified then
whileModifing x
else
pure ()
def collectDecls (decls : Array Decl) : M ParamMap := do
whileModifing (decls.forM collectDecl)
let s ← get
pure s.paramMap
def infer (env : Environment) (decls : Array Decl) : ParamMap :=
collectDecls decls { env := env } |>.run' { paramMap := mkInitParamMap env decls }
end Borrow
def inferBorrow (decls : Array Decl) : CompilerM (Array Decl) := do
let env ← getEnv
let paramMap := Borrow.infer env decls
pure (Borrow.applyParamMap decls paramMap)
end IR
end Lean
|
4807109e41927a27e900021532d84c55a618b550 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /src/Lean/Util/SCC.lean | 63d89ca771b9ff264ec898655c37cb89ab5f5b31 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,141 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Data.HashMap
namespace Lean.SCC
/-!
Very simple implementation of Tarjan's SCC algorithm.
Performance is not a goal here since we use this module to
compiler mutually recursive definitions, where each function
(and nested let-rec) in the mutual block is a vertex.
So, the graphs are small. -/
section
variable (α : Type) [BEq α] [Hashable α]
structure Data where
index? : Option Nat := none
lowlink? : Option Nat := none
onStack : Bool := false
structure State where
stack : List α := []
nextIndex : Nat := 0
data : HashMap α Data := {}
sccs : List (List α) := []
abbrev M := StateM (State α)
end
variable {α : Type} [BEq α] [Hashable α]
private def getDataOf (a : α) : M α Data := do
let s ← get
match s.data.find? a with
| some d => pure d
| none => pure {}
private def push (a : α) : M α Unit :=
modify fun s => { s with
stack := a :: s.stack,
nextIndex := s.nextIndex + 1,
data := s.data.insert a {
index? := s.nextIndex,
lowlink? := s.nextIndex,
onStack := true
}
}
private def modifyDataOf (a : α) (f : Data → Data) : M α Unit :=
modify fun s => { s with
data := match s.data.find? a with
| none => s.data
| some d => s.data.insert a (f d)
}
private def resetOnStack (a : α) : M α Unit :=
modifyDataOf a fun d => { d with onStack := false }
private def updateLowLinkOf (a : α) (v : Option Nat) : M α Unit :=
modifyDataOf a fun d => { d with
lowlink? := match d.lowlink?, v with
| i, none => i
| none, i => i
| some i, some j => if i < j then i else j
}
private def addSCC (a : α) : M α Unit := do
let rec add
| [], newSCC => modify fun s => { s with stack := [], sccs := newSCC :: s.sccs }
| b::bs, newSCC => do
resetOnStack b;
let newSCC := b::newSCC;
if a != b then
add bs newSCC
else
modify fun s => { s with stack := bs, sccs := newSCC :: s.sccs }
add (← get).stack []
private partial def sccAux (successorsOf : α → List α) (a : α) : M α Unit := do
push a
(successorsOf a).forM fun b => do
let bData ← getDataOf b;
if bData.index?.isNone then
-- `b` has not been visited yet
sccAux successorsOf b;
let bData ← getDataOf b;
updateLowLinkOf a bData.lowlink?
else if bData.onStack then do
-- `b` is on the stack. So, it must be in the current SCC
-- The edge `(a, b)` is pointing to an SCC already found and must be ignored
updateLowLinkOf a bData.index?
else
pure ()
let aData ← getDataOf a;
if aData.lowlink? == aData.index? then
addSCC a
def scc (vertices : List α) (successorsOf : α → List α) : List (List α) :=
let main : M α Unit := vertices.forM fun a => do
let aData ← getDataOf a
if aData.index?.isNone then sccAux successorsOf a
let (_, s) := main.run {}
s.sccs.reverse
end Lean.SCC
|
d91677d443f0298a9e4813842e2d63ecf05af689 | 969dbdfed67fda40a6f5a2b4f8c4a3c7dc01e0fb | /src/linear_algebra/matrix.lean | 7ae4c6150919bb13bb32e56a08956fde6608dc3f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | SAAluthwela/mathlib | 62044349d72dd63983a8500214736aa7779634d3 | 83a4b8b990907291421de54a78988c024dc8a552 | refs/heads/master | 1,679,433,873,417 | 1,615,998,031,000 | 1,615,998,031,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 58,727 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Casper Putz
-/
import linear_algebra.finite_dimensional
import linear_algebra.nonsingular_inverse
import linear_algebra.multilinear
import linear_algebra.dual
/-!
# Linear maps and matrices
This file defines the maps to send matrices to a linear map,
and to send linear maps between modules with a finite bases
to matrices. This defines a linear equivalence between linear maps
between finite-dimensional vector spaces and matrices indexed by
the respective bases.
It also defines the trace of an endomorphism, and the determinant of a family of vectors with
respect to some basis.
Some results are proved about the linear map corresponding to a
diagonal matrix (`range`, `ker` and `rank`).
Some results are proved for determinants of block triangular matrices.
## Main definitions
In the list below, and in all this file, `R` is a commutative ring (semiring
is sometimes enough), `M` and its variations are `R`-modules, `ι`, `κ`, `n` and `m` are finite
types used for indexing.
* `linear_map.to_matrix`: given bases `v₁ : ι → M₁` and `v₂ : κ → M₂`,
the `R`-linear equivalence from `M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂` to `matrix κ ι R`
* `matrix.to_lin`: the inverse of `linear_map.to_matrix`
* `linear_map.to_matrix'`: the `R`-linear equivalence from `(n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R)`
to `matrix n m R` (with the standard basis on `n → R` and `m → R`)
* `matrix.to_lin'`: the inverse of `linear_map.to_matrix'`
* `alg_equiv_matrix`: given a basis indexed by `n`, the `R`-algebra equivalence between
`R`-endomorphisms of `M` and `matrix n n R`
* `matrix.trace`: the trace of a square matrix
* `linear_map.trace`: the trace of an endomorphism
* `is_basis.to_matrix`: the matrix whose columns are a given family of vectors in a given basis
* `is_basis.to_matrix_equiv`: given a basis, the linear equivalence between families of vectors
and matrices arising from `is_basis.to_matrix`
* `is_basis.det`: the determinant of a family of vectors with respect to a basis, as a multilinear
map
## Tags
linear_map, matrix, linear_equiv, diagonal, det, trace
-/
noncomputable theory
open linear_map matrix set submodule
open_locale big_operators
open_locale matrix
universes u v w
section to_matrix'
variables {R : Type*} [comm_ring R]
variables {l m n : Type*} [fintype l] [fintype m] [fintype n]
instance [decidable_eq m] [decidable_eq n] (R) [fintype R] : fintype (matrix m n R) :=
by unfold matrix; apply_instance
/-- `matrix.mul_vec M` is a linear map. -/
def matrix.mul_vec_lin (M : matrix m n R) : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R) :=
{ to_fun := M.mul_vec,
map_add' := λ v w, funext (λ i, dot_product_add _ _ _),
map_smul' := λ c v, funext (λ i, dot_product_smul _ _ _) }
@[simp] lemma matrix.mul_vec_lin_apply (M : matrix m n R) (v : n → R) :
matrix.mul_vec_lin M v = M.mul_vec v := rfl
variables [decidable_eq n]
@[simp] lemma matrix.mul_vec_std_basis (M : matrix m n R) (i j) :
M.mul_vec (std_basis R (λ _, R) j 1) i = M i j :=
begin
have : (∑ j', M i j' * if j = j' then 1 else 0) = M i j,
{ simp_rw [mul_boole, finset.sum_ite_eq, finset.mem_univ, if_true] },
convert this,
ext,
split_ifs with h; simp only [std_basis_apply],
{ rw [h, function.update_same] },
{ rw [function.update_noteq (ne.symm h), pi.zero_apply] }
end
/-- Linear maps `(n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R)` are linearly equivalent to `matrix m n R`. -/
def linear_map.to_matrix' : ((n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R)) ≃ₗ[R] matrix m n R :=
{ to_fun := λ f i j, f (std_basis R (λ _, R) j 1) i,
inv_fun := matrix.mul_vec_lin,
right_inv := λ M, by { ext i j, simp only [matrix.mul_vec_std_basis, matrix.mul_vec_lin_apply] },
left_inv := λ f, begin
apply (pi.is_basis_fun R n).ext,
intro j, ext i,
simp only [matrix.mul_vec_std_basis, matrix.mul_vec_lin_apply]
end,
map_add' := λ f g, by { ext i j, simp only [pi.add_apply, linear_map.add_apply] },
map_smul' := λ c f, by { ext i j, simp only [pi.smul_apply, linear_map.smul_apply] } }
/-- A `matrix m n R` is linearly equivalent to a linear map `(n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R)`. -/
def matrix.to_lin' : matrix m n R ≃ₗ[R] ((n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R)) :=
linear_map.to_matrix'.symm
@[simp] lemma linear_map.to_matrix'_symm :
(linear_map.to_matrix'.symm : matrix m n R ≃ₗ[R] _) = matrix.to_lin' :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma matrix.to_lin'_symm :
(matrix.to_lin'.symm : ((n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R)) ≃ₗ[R] _) = linear_map.to_matrix' :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma linear_map.to_matrix'_to_lin' (M : matrix m n R) :
linear_map.to_matrix' (matrix.to_lin' M) = M :=
linear_map.to_matrix'.apply_symm_apply M
@[simp] lemma matrix.to_lin'_to_matrix' (f : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R)) :
matrix.to_lin' (linear_map.to_matrix' f) = f :=
matrix.to_lin'.apply_symm_apply f
@[simp] lemma linear_map.to_matrix'_apply (f : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R)) (i j) :
linear_map.to_matrix' f i j = f (λ j', if j' = j then 1 else 0) i :=
begin
simp only [linear_map.to_matrix', linear_equiv.coe_mk],
congr,
ext j',
split_ifs with h,
{ rw [h, std_basis_same] },
apply std_basis_ne _ _ _ _ h
end
@[simp] lemma matrix.to_lin'_apply (M : matrix m n R) (v : n → R) :
matrix.to_lin' M v = M.mul_vec v := rfl
@[simp] lemma matrix.to_lin'_one :
matrix.to_lin' (1 : matrix n n R) = id :=
by { ext, simp [linear_map.one_apply, std_basis_apply] }
@[simp] lemma linear_map.to_matrix'_id :
(linear_map.to_matrix' (linear_map.id : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R))) = 1 :=
by { ext, rw [matrix.one_apply, linear_map.to_matrix'_apply, id_apply] }
@[simp] lemma matrix.to_lin'_mul [decidable_eq m] (M : matrix l m R) (N : matrix m n R) :
matrix.to_lin' (M ⬝ N) = (matrix.to_lin' M).comp (matrix.to_lin' N) :=
by { ext, simp }
lemma linear_map.to_matrix'_comp [decidable_eq l]
(f : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R)) (g : (l → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)) :
(f.comp g).to_matrix' = f.to_matrix' ⬝ g.to_matrix' :=
suffices (f.comp g) = (f.to_matrix' ⬝ g.to_matrix').to_lin',
by rw [this, linear_map.to_matrix'_to_lin'],
by rw [matrix.to_lin'_mul, matrix.to_lin'_to_matrix', matrix.to_lin'_to_matrix']
lemma linear_map.to_matrix'_mul [decidable_eq m]
(f g : (m → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R)) :
(f * g).to_matrix' = f.to_matrix' ⬝ g.to_matrix' :=
linear_map.to_matrix'_comp f g
/-- Linear maps `(n → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)` are algebra equivalent to `matrix n n R`. -/
def linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv' : ((n → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)) ≃ₐ[R] matrix n n R :=
alg_equiv.of_linear_equiv linear_map.to_matrix' linear_map.to_matrix'_mul
(by simp [module.algebra_map_End_eq_smul_id])
/-- A `matrix n n R` is algebra equivalent to a linear map `(n → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)`. -/
def matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv' : matrix n n R ≃ₐ[R] ((n → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)) :=
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv'.symm
@[simp] lemma linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv'_symm :
(linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv'.symm : matrix n n R ≃ₐ[R] _) = matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv' :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv'_symm :
(matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv'.symm : ((n → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)) ≃ₐ[R] _) =
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv' :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv'_to_lin_alg_equiv' (M : matrix n n R) :
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv' (matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv' M) = M :=
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv'.apply_symm_apply M
@[simp] lemma matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv'_to_matrix_alg_equiv' (f : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)) :
matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv' (linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv' f) = f :=
matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv'.apply_symm_apply f
@[simp] lemma linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv'_apply (f : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)) (i j) :
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv' f i j = f (λ j', if j' = j then 1 else 0) i :=
by simp [linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv']
@[simp] lemma matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv'_apply (M : matrix n n R) (v : n → R) :
matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv' M v = M.mul_vec v := rfl
@[simp] lemma matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv'_one :
matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv' (1 : matrix n n R) = id :=
by { ext, simp [matrix.one_apply, std_basis_apply] }
@[simp] lemma linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv'_id :
(linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv' (linear_map.id : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R))) = 1 :=
by { ext, rw [matrix.one_apply, linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv'_apply, id_apply] }
@[simp] lemma matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv'_mul (M N : matrix n n R) :
matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv' (M ⬝ N) =
(matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv' M).comp (matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv' N) :=
by { ext, simp }
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv'_comp (f g : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)) :
(f.comp g).to_matrix_alg_equiv' = f.to_matrix_alg_equiv' ⬝ g.to_matrix_alg_equiv' :=
suffices (f.comp g) = (f.to_matrix_alg_equiv' ⬝ g.to_matrix_alg_equiv').to_lin_alg_equiv',
by rw [this, linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv'_to_lin_alg_equiv'],
by rw [matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv'_mul, matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv'_to_matrix_alg_equiv',
matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv'_to_matrix_alg_equiv']
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv'_mul
(f g : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)) :
(f * g).to_matrix_alg_equiv' = f.to_matrix_alg_equiv' ⬝ g.to_matrix_alg_equiv' :=
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv'_comp f g
end to_matrix'
section to_matrix
variables {R : Type*} [comm_ring R]
variables {l m n : Type*} [fintype l] [fintype m] [fintype n] [decidable_eq n]
variables {M₁ M₂ : Type*} [add_comm_group M₁] [add_comm_group M₂] [module R M₁] [module R M₂]
variables {v₁ : n → M₁} (hv₁ : is_basis R v₁) {v₂ : m → M₂} (hv₂ : is_basis R v₂)
/-- Given bases of two modules `M₁` and `M₂` over a commutative ring `R`, we get a linear
equivalence between linear maps `M₁ →ₗ M₂` and matrices over `R` indexed by the bases. -/
def linear_map.to_matrix : (M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) ≃ₗ[R] matrix m n R :=
linear_equiv.trans (linear_equiv.arrow_congr hv₁.equiv_fun hv₂.equiv_fun) linear_map.to_matrix'
/-- Given bases of two modules `M₁` and `M₂` over a commutative ring `R`, we get a linear
equivalence between matrices over `R` indexed by the bases and linear maps `M₁ →ₗ M₂`. -/
def matrix.to_lin : matrix m n R ≃ₗ[R] (M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) :=
(linear_map.to_matrix hv₁ hv₂).symm
@[simp] lemma linear_map.to_matrix_symm :
(linear_map.to_matrix hv₁ hv₂).symm = matrix.to_lin hv₁ hv₂ :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma matrix.to_lin_symm :
(matrix.to_lin hv₁ hv₂).symm = linear_map.to_matrix hv₁ hv₂ :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma matrix.to_lin_to_matrix (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) :
matrix.to_lin hv₁ hv₂ (linear_map.to_matrix hv₁ hv₂ f) = f :=
by rw [← matrix.to_lin_symm, linear_equiv.apply_symm_apply]
@[simp] lemma linear_map.to_matrix_to_lin (M : matrix m n R) :
linear_map.to_matrix hv₁ hv₂ (matrix.to_lin hv₁ hv₂ M) = M :=
by rw [← matrix.to_lin_symm, linear_equiv.symm_apply_apply]
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_apply (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (i : m) (j : n) :
linear_map.to_matrix hv₁ hv₂ f i j = hv₂.equiv_fun (f (v₁ j)) i :=
begin
rw [linear_map.to_matrix, linear_equiv.trans_apply, linear_map.to_matrix'_apply,
linear_equiv.arrow_congr_apply, is_basis.equiv_fun_symm_apply, finset.sum_eq_single j,
if_pos rfl, one_smul],
{ intros j' _ hj',
rw [if_neg hj', zero_smul] },
{ intro hj,
have := finset.mem_univ j,
contradiction }
end
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_transpose_apply (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (j : n) :
(linear_map.to_matrix hv₁ hv₂ f)ᵀ j = hv₂.equiv_fun (f (v₁ j)) :=
funext $ λ i, f.to_matrix_apply _ _ i j
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_apply' (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (i : m) (j : n) :
linear_map.to_matrix hv₁ hv₂ f i j = hv₂.repr (f (v₁ j)) i :=
linear_map.to_matrix_apply hv₁ hv₂ f i j
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_transpose_apply' (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (j : n) :
(linear_map.to_matrix hv₁ hv₂ f)ᵀ j = hv₂.repr (f (v₁ j)) :=
linear_map.to_matrix_transpose_apply hv₁ hv₂ f j
lemma matrix.to_lin_apply (M : matrix m n R) (v : M₁) :
matrix.to_lin hv₁ hv₂ M v = ∑ j, M.mul_vec (hv₁.equiv_fun v) j • v₂ j :=
show hv₂.equiv_fun.symm (matrix.to_lin' M (hv₁.equiv_fun v)) = _,
by rw [matrix.to_lin'_apply, hv₂.equiv_fun_symm_apply]
@[simp] lemma matrix.to_lin_self (M : matrix m n R) (i : n) :
matrix.to_lin hv₁ hv₂ M (v₁ i) = ∑ j, M j i • v₂ j :=
by simp only [matrix.to_lin_apply, matrix.mul_vec, dot_product, hv₁.equiv_fun_self, mul_boole,
finset.sum_ite_eq, finset.mem_univ, if_true]
/-- This will be a special case of `linear_map.to_matrix_id_eq_basis_to_matrix`. -/
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_id : linear_map.to_matrix hv₁ hv₁ id = 1 :=
begin
ext i j,
simp [linear_map.to_matrix_apply, is_basis.equiv_fun, matrix.one_apply, finsupp.single, eq_comm]
end
@[simp]
lemma matrix.to_lin_one : matrix.to_lin hv₁ hv₁ 1 = id :=
by rw [← linear_map.to_matrix_id hv₁, matrix.to_lin_to_matrix]
theorem linear_map.to_matrix_range [decidable_eq M₁] [decidable_eq M₂]
(f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (k : m) (i : n) :
linear_map.to_matrix hv₁.range hv₂.range f ⟨v₂ k, mem_range_self k⟩ ⟨v₁ i, mem_range_self i⟩ =
linear_map.to_matrix hv₁ hv₂ f k i :=
by simp_rw [linear_map.to_matrix_apply, subtype.coe_mk, is_basis.equiv_fun_apply, hv₂.range_repr]
variables {M₃ : Type*} [add_comm_group M₃] [module R M₃] {v₃ : l → M₃} (hv₃ : is_basis R v₃)
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_comp [decidable_eq m] (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) :
linear_map.to_matrix hv₁ hv₃ (f.comp g) =
linear_map.to_matrix hv₂ hv₃ f ⬝ linear_map.to_matrix hv₁ hv₂ g :=
by simp_rw [linear_map.to_matrix, linear_equiv.trans_apply,
linear_equiv.arrow_congr_comp _ hv₂.equiv_fun, linear_map.to_matrix'_comp]
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_mul (f g : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) :
linear_map.to_matrix hv₁ hv₁ (f * g) =
linear_map.to_matrix hv₁ hv₁ f ⬝ linear_map.to_matrix hv₁ hv₁ g :=
by { rw [show (@has_mul.mul (M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) _) = linear_map.comp, from rfl,
linear_map.to_matrix_comp hv₁ hv₁ hv₁ f g] }
lemma matrix.to_lin_mul [decidable_eq m] (A : matrix l m R) (B : matrix m n R) :
matrix.to_lin hv₁ hv₃ (A ⬝ B) =
(matrix.to_lin hv₂ hv₃ A).comp (matrix.to_lin hv₁ hv₂ B) :=
begin
apply (linear_map.to_matrix hv₁ hv₃).injective,
haveI : decidable_eq l := λ _ _, classical.prop_decidable _,
rw linear_map.to_matrix_comp hv₁ hv₂ hv₃,
repeat { rw linear_map.to_matrix_to_lin },
end
/-- Given a basis of a module `M₁` over a commutative ring `R`, we get an algebra
equivalence between linear maps `M₁ →ₗ M₁` and square matrices over `R` indexed by the basis. -/
def linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv :
(M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) ≃ₐ[R] matrix n n R :=
alg_equiv.of_linear_equiv (linear_map.to_matrix hv₁ hv₁) (linear_map.to_matrix_mul hv₁)
(by simp [module.algebra_map_End_eq_smul_id, linear_map.to_matrix_id])
/-- Given a basis of a module `M₁` over a commutative ring `R`, we get an algebra
equivalence between square matrices over `R` indexed by the basis and linear maps `M₁ →ₗ M₁`. -/
def matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv : matrix n n R ≃ₐ[R] (M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) :=
(linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv hv₁).symm
@[simp] lemma linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv_symm :
(linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv hv₁).symm = matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv hv₁ :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv_symm :
(matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv hv₁).symm = linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv hv₁ :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv_to_matrix_alg_equiv (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) :
matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv hv₁ (linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv hv₁ f) = f :=
by rw [← matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv_symm, alg_equiv.apply_symm_apply]
@[simp] lemma linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv_to_lin_alg_equiv (M : matrix n n R) :
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv hv₁ (matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv hv₁ M) = M :=
by rw [← matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv_symm, alg_equiv.symm_apply_apply]
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv_apply (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) (i j : n) :
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv hv₁ f i j = hv₁.equiv_fun (f (v₁ j)) i :=
by simp [linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv, linear_map.to_matrix_apply]
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv_transpose_apply (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) (j : n) :
(linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv hv₁ f)ᵀ j = hv₁.equiv_fun (f (v₁ j)) :=
funext $ λ i, f.to_matrix_apply _ _ i j
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv_apply' (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) (i j : n) :
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv hv₁ f i j = hv₁.repr (f (v₁ j)) i :=
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv_apply hv₁ f i j
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv_transpose_apply' (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) (j : n) :
(linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv hv₁ f)ᵀ j = hv₁.repr (f (v₁ j)) :=
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv_transpose_apply hv₁ f j
lemma matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv_apply (M : matrix n n R) (v : M₁) :
matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv hv₁ M v = ∑ j, M.mul_vec (hv₁.equiv_fun v) j • v₁ j :=
show hv₁.equiv_fun.symm (matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv' M (hv₁.equiv_fun v)) = _,
by rw [matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv'_apply, hv₁.equiv_fun_symm_apply]
@[simp] lemma matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv_self (M : matrix n n R) (i : n) :
matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv hv₁ M (v₁ i) = ∑ j, M j i • v₁ j :=
by simp only [matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv_apply, matrix.mul_vec, dot_product, hv₁.equiv_fun_self,
mul_boole, finset.sum_ite_eq, finset.mem_univ, if_true]
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv_id : linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv hv₁ id = 1 :=
by simp_rw [linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv, alg_equiv.of_linear_equiv_apply,
linear_map.to_matrix_id]
@[simp]
lemma matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv_one : matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv hv₁ 1 = id :=
by rw [← linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv_id hv₁, matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv_to_matrix_alg_equiv]
theorem linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv_range [decidable_eq M₁]
(f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) (k i : n) :
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv hv₁.range f ⟨v₁ k, mem_range_self k⟩ ⟨v₁ i, mem_range_self i⟩ =
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv hv₁ f k i :=
by simp_rw [linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv_apply, subtype.coe_mk, is_basis.equiv_fun_apply,
hv₁.range_repr]
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv_comp (f g : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) :
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv hv₁ (f.comp g) =
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv hv₁ f ⬝ linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv hv₁ g :=
by simp [linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv, linear_map.to_matrix_comp hv₁ hv₁ hv₁ f g]
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv_mul (f g : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) :
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv hv₁ (f * g) =
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv hv₁ f ⬝ linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv hv₁ g :=
by { rw [show (@has_mul.mul (M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) _) = linear_map.comp, from rfl,
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv_comp hv₁ f g] }
lemma matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv_mul (A B : matrix n n R) :
matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv hv₁ (A ⬝ B) =
(matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv hv₁ A).comp (matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv hv₁ B) :=
by convert matrix.to_lin_mul hv₁ hv₁ hv₁ A B
end to_matrix
section is_basis_to_matrix
variables {ι ι' κ κ' : Type*} [fintype ι] [fintype ι'] [fintype κ] [fintype κ']
variables {R M : Type*} [comm_ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
open function matrix
/-- From a basis `e : ι → M` and a family of vectors `v : ι' → M`, make the matrix whose columns
are the vectors `v i` written in the basis `e`. -/
def is_basis.to_matrix {e : ι → M} (he : is_basis R e) (v : ι' → M) : matrix ι ι' R :=
λ i j, he.equiv_fun (v j) i
variables {e : ι → M} (he : is_basis R e) (v : ι' → M) (i : ι) (j : ι')
namespace is_basis
lemma to_matrix_apply : he.to_matrix v i j = he.equiv_fun (v j) i :=
rfl
lemma to_matrix_transpose_apply : (he.to_matrix v)ᵀ j = he.repr (v j) :=
funext $ (λ _, rfl)
lemma to_matrix_eq_to_matrix_constr [decidable_eq ι] (v : ι → M) :
he.to_matrix v = linear_map.to_matrix he he (he.constr v) :=
by { ext, simp [is_basis.to_matrix_apply, linear_map.to_matrix_apply] }
@[simp] lemma to_matrix_self [decidable_eq ι] : he.to_matrix e = 1 :=
begin
rw is_basis.to_matrix,
ext i j,
simp [is_basis.equiv_fun, matrix.one_apply, finsupp.single, eq_comm]
end
lemma to_matrix_update [decidable_eq ι'] (x : M) :
he.to_matrix (function.update v j x) = matrix.update_column (he.to_matrix v) j (he.repr x) :=
begin
ext i' k,
rw [is_basis.to_matrix, matrix.update_column_apply, he.to_matrix_apply],
split_ifs,
{ rw [h, update_same j x v, he.equiv_fun_apply] },
{ rw update_noteq h },
end
@[simp] lemma sum_to_matrix_smul_self : ∑ (i : ι), he.to_matrix v i j • e i = v j :=
begin
conv_rhs { rw ← he.total_repr (v j) },
rw [finsupp.total_apply, finsupp.sum_fintype],
{ refl },
simp
end
@[simp] lemma to_lin_to_matrix [decidable_eq ι'] (hv : is_basis R v) :
matrix.to_lin hv he (he.to_matrix v) = id :=
hv.ext (λ i, by rw [to_lin_self, id_apply, he.sum_to_matrix_smul_self])
/-- From a basis `e : ι → M`, build a linear equivalence between families of vectors `v : ι → M`,
and matrices, making the matrix whose columns are the vectors `v i` written in the basis `e`. -/
def to_matrix_equiv {e : ι → M} (he : is_basis R e) : (ι → M) ≃ₗ[R] matrix ι ι R :=
{ to_fun := he.to_matrix,
map_add' := λ v w, begin
ext i j,
change _ = _ + _,
simp [he.to_matrix_apply]
end,
map_smul' := begin
intros c v,
ext i j,
simp [he.to_matrix_apply]
end,
inv_fun := λ m j, ∑ i, (m i j) • e i,
left_inv := begin
intro v,
ext j,
simp [he.to_matrix_apply, he.equiv_fun_total (v j)]
end,
right_inv := begin
intros x,
ext k l,
simp [he.to_matrix_apply, he.equiv_fun.map_sum, he.equiv_fun.map_smul,
fintype.sum_apply k (λ i, x i l • he.equiv_fun (e i)),
he.equiv_fun_self]
end }
end is_basis
section mul_linear_map_to_matrix
variables {N : Type*} [add_comm_group N] [module R N]
variables {b : ι → M} {b' : ι' → M} {c : κ → N} {c' : κ' → N}
variables (hb : is_basis R b) (hb' : is_basis R b') (hc : is_basis R c) (hc' : is_basis R c')
variables (f : M →ₗ[R] N)
open linear_map
@[simp] lemma is_basis_to_matrix_mul_linear_map_to_matrix [decidable_eq ι'] :
hc.to_matrix c' ⬝ linear_map.to_matrix hb' hc' f = linear_map.to_matrix hb' hc f :=
(matrix.to_lin hb' hc).injective
(by haveI := classical.dec_eq κ';
rw [to_lin_to_matrix, to_lin_mul hb' hc' hc, to_lin_to_matrix, hc.to_lin_to_matrix, id_comp])
@[simp] lemma linear_map_to_matrix_mul_is_basis_to_matrix [decidable_eq ι] [decidable_eq ι'] :
linear_map.to_matrix hb' hc' f ⬝ hb'.to_matrix b = linear_map.to_matrix hb hc' f :=
(matrix.to_lin hb hc').injective
(by rw [to_lin_to_matrix, to_lin_mul hb hb' hc', to_lin_to_matrix, hb'.to_lin_to_matrix, comp_id])
/-- A generalization of `linear_map.to_matrix_id`. -/
@[simp] lemma linear_map.to_matrix_id_eq_basis_to_matrix [decidable_eq ι] :
linear_map.to_matrix hb hb' id = hb'.to_matrix b :=
by { haveI := classical.dec_eq ι',
rw [← is_basis_to_matrix_mul_linear_map_to_matrix hb hb', to_matrix_id, matrix.mul_one] }
/-- A generalization of `is_basis.to_matrix_self`, in the opposite direction. -/
@[simp] lemma is_basis.to_matrix_mul_to_matrix
{ι'' : Type*} [fintype ι''] {b'' : ι'' → M} (hb'' : is_basis R b'') :
hb.to_matrix b' ⬝ hb'.to_matrix b'' = hb.to_matrix b'' :=
begin
haveI := classical.dec_eq ι,
haveI := classical.dec_eq ι',
haveI := classical.dec_eq ι'',
rw [← linear_map.to_matrix_id_eq_basis_to_matrix hb' hb,
← linear_map.to_matrix_id_eq_basis_to_matrix hb'' hb',
← to_matrix_comp, id_comp, linear_map.to_matrix_id_eq_basis_to_matrix],
end
end mul_linear_map_to_matrix
end is_basis_to_matrix
open_locale matrix
section det
open linear_map matrix
variables {R : Type*} [comm_ring R]
variables {M : Type*} [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
variables {M' : Type*} [add_comm_group M'] [module R M']
variables {ι : Type*} [decidable_eq ι] [fintype ι] {v : ι → M} {v' : ι → M'}
lemma linear_equiv.is_unit_det (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M') (hv : is_basis R v) (hv' : is_basis R v') :
is_unit (linear_map.to_matrix hv hv' f).det :=
begin
apply is_unit_det_of_left_inverse,
simpa using (linear_map.to_matrix_comp hv hv' hv f.symm f).symm
end
/-- Builds a linear equivalence from a linear map whose determinant in some bases is a unit. -/
def linear_equiv.of_is_unit_det {f : M →ₗ[R] M'} {hv : is_basis R v} {hv' : is_basis R v'}
(h : is_unit (linear_map.to_matrix hv hv' f).det) : M ≃ₗ[R] M' :=
{ to_fun := f,
map_add' := f.map_add,
map_smul' := f.map_smul,
inv_fun := to_lin hv' hv (to_matrix hv hv' f)⁻¹,
left_inv := λ x,
calc to_lin hv' hv (to_matrix hv hv' f)⁻¹ (f x)
= to_lin hv hv ((to_matrix hv hv' f)⁻¹ ⬝ to_matrix hv hv' f) x :
by { rw [to_lin_mul hv hv' hv, to_lin_to_matrix, linear_map.comp_apply] }
... = x : by simp [h],
right_inv := λ x,
calc f (to_lin hv' hv (to_matrix hv hv' f)⁻¹ x)
= to_lin hv' hv' (to_matrix hv hv' f ⬝ (to_matrix hv hv' f)⁻¹) x :
by { rw [to_lin_mul hv' hv hv', linear_map.comp_apply, to_lin_to_matrix hv hv'] }
... = x : by simp [h],
}
variables {e : ι → M} (he : is_basis R e)
/-- The determinant of a family of vectors with respect to some basis, as an alternating
multilinear map. -/
def is_basis.det : alternating_map R M R ι :=
{ to_fun := λ v, det (he.to_matrix v),
map_add' := begin
intros v i x y,
simp only [he.to_matrix_update, linear_map.map_add],
apply det_update_column_add
end,
map_smul' := begin
intros u i c x,
simp only [he.to_matrix_update, algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, map_smul_of_tower],
apply det_update_column_smul
end,
map_eq_zero_of_eq' := begin
intros v i j h hij,
rw [←function.update_eq_self i v, h, ←det_transpose, he.to_matrix_update,
←update_row_transpose, ←he.to_matrix_transpose_apply],
apply det_zero_of_row_eq hij,
rw [update_row_ne hij.symm, update_row_self],
end }
lemma is_basis.det_apply (v : ι → M) : he.det v = det (he.to_matrix v) := rfl
lemma is_basis.det_self : he.det e = 1 :=
by simp [he.det_apply]
lemma is_basis.iff_det {v : ι → M} : is_basis R v ↔ is_unit (he.det v) :=
begin
split,
{ intro hv,
suffices :
is_unit (linear_map.to_matrix he he (linear_equiv_of_is_basis he hv $ equiv.refl ι)).det,
{ rw [is_basis.det_apply, is_basis.to_matrix_eq_to_matrix_constr],
exact this },
apply linear_equiv.is_unit_det },
{ intro h,
rw [is_basis.det_apply, is_basis.to_matrix_eq_to_matrix_constr] at h,
convert linear_equiv.is_basis he (linear_equiv.of_is_unit_det h),
ext i,
exact (constr_basis he).symm },
end
end det
section transpose
variables {K V₁ V₂ ι₁ ι₂ : Type*} [field K]
[add_comm_group V₁] [vector_space K V₁]
[add_comm_group V₂] [vector_space K V₂]
[fintype ι₁] [fintype ι₂] [decidable_eq ι₁] [decidable_eq ι₂]
{B₁ : ι₁ → V₁} (h₁ : is_basis K B₁)
{B₂ : ι₂ → V₂} (h₂ : is_basis K B₂)
@[simp] lemma linear_map.to_matrix_transpose (u : V₁ →ₗ[K] V₂) :
linear_map.to_matrix h₂.dual_basis_is_basis h₁.dual_basis_is_basis (module.dual.transpose u) =
(linear_map.to_matrix h₁ h₂ u)ᵀ :=
begin
ext i j,
simp only [linear_map.to_matrix_apply, module.dual.transpose_apply, h₁.dual_basis_equiv_fun,
h₂.dual_basis_apply, matrix.transpose_apply, linear_map.comp_apply]
end
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_symm_transpose (M : matrix ι₁ ι₂ K) :
(linear_map.to_matrix h₁.dual_basis_is_basis h₂.dual_basis_is_basis).symm Mᵀ =
module.dual.transpose (matrix.to_lin h₂ h₁ M) :=
begin
apply (linear_map.to_matrix h₁.dual_basis_is_basis h₂.dual_basis_is_basis).injective,
rw [linear_equiv.apply_symm_apply],
ext i j,
simp only [linear_map.to_matrix_apply, module.dual.transpose_apply, h₂.dual_basis_equiv_fun,
h₁.dual_basis_apply, matrix.transpose_apply, linear_map.comp_apply, if_true,
matrix.to_lin_apply, linear_equiv.map_smul, mul_boole, algebra.id.smul_eq_mul,
linear_equiv.map_sum, is_basis.equiv_fun_self, fintype.sum_apply, finset.sum_ite_eq',
finset.sum_ite_eq, is_basis.equiv_fun_symm_apply, pi.smul_apply, matrix.to_lin_apply,
matrix.mul_vec, matrix.dot_product, is_basis.equiv_fun_self, finset.mem_univ]
end
end transpose
namespace matrix
section trace
variables {m : Type*} [fintype m] (n : Type*) [fintype n]
variables (R : Type v) (M : Type w) [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule R M]
/--
The diagonal of a square matrix.
-/
def diag : (matrix n n M) →ₗ[R] n → M :=
{ to_fun := λ A i, A i i,
map_add' := by { intros, ext, refl, },
map_smul' := by { intros, ext, refl, } }
variables {n} {R} {M}
@[simp] lemma diag_apply (A : matrix n n M) (i : n) : diag n R M A i = A i i := rfl
@[simp] lemma diag_one [decidable_eq n] :
diag n R R 1 = λ i, 1 := by { dunfold diag, ext, simp [one_apply_eq] }
@[simp] lemma diag_transpose (A : matrix n n M) : diag n R M Aᵀ = diag n R M A := rfl
variables (n) (R) (M)
/--
The trace of a square matrix.
-/
def trace : (matrix n n M) →ₗ[R] M :=
{ to_fun := λ A, ∑ i, diag n R M A i,
map_add' := by { intros, apply finset.sum_add_distrib, },
map_smul' := by { intros, simp [finset.smul_sum], } }
variables {n} {R} {M}
@[simp] lemma trace_diag (A : matrix n n M) : trace n R M A = ∑ i, diag n R M A i := rfl
@[simp] lemma trace_one [decidable_eq n] :
trace n R R 1 = fintype.card n :=
have h : trace n R R 1 = ∑ i, diag n R R 1 i := rfl,
by simp_rw [h, diag_one, finset.sum_const, nsmul_one]; refl
@[simp] lemma trace_transpose (A : matrix n n M) : trace n R M Aᵀ = trace n R M A := rfl
@[simp] lemma trace_transpose_mul (A : matrix m n R) (B : matrix n m R) :
trace n R R (Aᵀ ⬝ Bᵀ) = trace m R R (A ⬝ B) := finset.sum_comm
lemma trace_mul_comm {S : Type v} [comm_ring S] (A : matrix m n S) (B : matrix n m S) :
trace n S S (B ⬝ A) = trace m S S (A ⬝ B) :=
by rw [←trace_transpose, ←trace_transpose_mul, transpose_mul]
end trace
section ring
variables {n : Type*} [fintype n] [decidable_eq n] {R : Type v} [comm_ring R]
open linear_map matrix
lemma proj_diagonal (i : n) (w : n → R) :
(proj i).comp (to_lin' (diagonal w)) = (w i) • proj i :=
by ext j; simp [mul_vec_diagonal]
lemma diagonal_comp_std_basis (w : n → R) (i : n) :
(diagonal w).to_lin'.comp (std_basis R (λ_:n, R) i) = (w i) • std_basis R (λ_:n, R) i :=
begin
ext j,
simp_rw [linear_map.comp_apply, to_lin'_apply, mul_vec_diagonal, linear_map.smul_apply,
pi.smul_apply, algebra.id.smul_eq_mul],
by_cases i = j,
{ subst h },
{ rw [std_basis_ne R (λ_:n, R) _ _ (ne.symm h), _root_.mul_zero, _root_.mul_zero] }
end
lemma diagonal_to_lin' (w : n → R) :
(diagonal w).to_lin' = linear_map.pi (λi, w i • linear_map.proj i) :=
by ext v j; simp [mul_vec_diagonal]
/-- An invertible matrix yields a linear equivalence from the free module to itself. -/
def to_linear_equiv (P : matrix n n R) (h : is_unit P) : (n → R) ≃ₗ[R] (n → R) :=
have h' : is_unit P.det := P.is_unit_iff_is_unit_det.mp h,
{ inv_fun := P⁻¹.to_lin',
left_inv := λ v,
show (P⁻¹.to_lin'.comp P.to_lin') v = v,
by rw [← matrix.to_lin'_mul, P.nonsing_inv_mul h', matrix.to_lin'_one, linear_map.id_apply],
right_inv := λ v,
show (P.to_lin'.comp P⁻¹.to_lin') v = v,
by rw [← matrix.to_lin'_mul, P.mul_nonsing_inv h', matrix.to_lin'_one, linear_map.id_apply],
..P.to_lin' }
@[simp] lemma to_linear_equiv_apply (P : matrix n n R) (h : is_unit P) :
(↑(P.to_linear_equiv h) : module.End R (n → R)) = P.to_lin' := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_linear_equiv_symm_apply (P : matrix n n R) (h : is_unit P) :
(↑(P.to_linear_equiv h).symm : module.End R (n → R)) = P⁻¹.to_lin' := rfl
end ring
section vector_space
variables {m n : Type*} [fintype m] [fintype n]
variables {K : Type u} [field K] -- maybe try to relax the universe constraint
open linear_map matrix
lemma rank_vec_mul_vec {m n : Type u} [fintype m] [fintype n] [decidable_eq n]
(w : m → K) (v : n → K) :
rank (vec_mul_vec w v).to_lin' ≤ 1 :=
begin
rw [vec_mul_vec_eq, to_lin'_mul],
refine le_trans (rank_comp_le1 _ _) _,
refine le_trans (rank_le_domain _) _,
rw [dim_fun', ← cardinal.lift_eq_nat_iff.mpr (cardinal.fintype_card unit), cardinal.mk_unit],
exact le_of_eq (cardinal.lift_one)
end
lemma ker_diagonal_to_lin' [decidable_eq m] (w : m → K) :
ker (diagonal w).to_lin' = (⨆i∈{i | w i = 0 }, range (std_basis K (λi, K) i)) :=
begin
rw [← comap_bot, ← infi_ker_proj],
simp only [comap_infi, (ker_comp _ _).symm, proj_diagonal, ker_smul'],
have : univ ⊆ {i : m | w i = 0} ∪ {i : m | w i = 0}ᶜ, { rw set.union_compl_self },
exact (supr_range_std_basis_eq_infi_ker_proj K (λi:m, K)
disjoint_compl_right this (finite.of_fintype _)).symm
end
lemma range_diagonal [decidable_eq m] (w : m → K) :
(diagonal w).to_lin'.range = (⨆ i ∈ {i | w i ≠ 0}, (std_basis K (λi, K) i).range) :=
begin
dsimp only [mem_set_of_eq],
rw [← map_top, ← supr_range_std_basis, map_supr],
congr, funext i,
rw [← linear_map.range_comp, diagonal_comp_std_basis, ← range_smul']
end
lemma rank_diagonal [decidable_eq m] [decidable_eq K] (w : m → K) :
rank (diagonal w).to_lin' = fintype.card { i // w i ≠ 0 } :=
begin
have hu : univ ⊆ {i : m | w i = 0}ᶜ ∪ {i : m | w i = 0}, { rw set.compl_union_self },
have hd : disjoint {i : m | w i ≠ 0} {i : m | w i = 0} := disjoint_compl_left,
have h₁ := supr_range_std_basis_eq_infi_ker_proj K (λi:m, K) hd hu (finite.of_fintype _),
have h₂ := @infi_ker_proj_equiv K _ _ (λi:m, K) _ _ _ _ (by simp; apply_instance) hd hu,
rw [rank, range_diagonal, h₁, ←@dim_fun' K],
apply linear_equiv.dim_eq,
apply h₂,
end
end vector_space
section finite_dimensional
variables {m n : Type*} [fintype m] [fintype n]
variables {R : Type v} [field R]
instance : finite_dimensional R (matrix m n R) :=
linear_equiv.finite_dimensional (linear_equiv.uncurry R m n).symm
/--
The dimension of the space of finite dimensional matrices
is the product of the number of rows and columns.
-/
@[simp] lemma findim_matrix :
finite_dimensional.findim R (matrix m n R) = fintype.card m * fintype.card n :=
by rw [@linear_equiv.findim_eq R (matrix m n R) _ _ _ _ _ _ (linear_equiv.uncurry R m n),
finite_dimensional.findim_fintype_fun_eq_card, fintype.card_prod]
end finite_dimensional
section reindexing
variables {l m n : Type*} [fintype l] [fintype m] [fintype n]
variables {l' m' n' : Type*} [fintype l'] [fintype m'] [fintype n']
variables {R : Type v}
/-- The natural map that reindexes a matrix's rows and columns with equivalent types is an
equivalence. -/
def reindex (eₘ : m ≃ m') (eₙ : n ≃ n') : matrix m n R ≃ matrix m' n' R :=
{ to_fun := λ M i j, M (eₘ.symm i) (eₙ.symm j),
inv_fun := λ M i j, M (eₘ i) (eₙ j),
left_inv := λ M, by simp,
right_inv := λ M, by simp, }
@[simp] lemma reindex_apply (eₘ : m ≃ m') (eₙ : n ≃ n') (M : matrix m n R) :
reindex eₘ eₙ M = λ i j, M (eₘ.symm i) (eₙ.symm j) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma reindex_symm_apply (eₘ : m ≃ m') (eₙ : n ≃ n') (M : matrix m' n' R) :
(reindex eₘ eₙ).symm M = λ i j, M (eₘ i) (eₙ j) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma reindex_refl_refl (A : matrix m n R) :
(reindex (equiv.refl _) (equiv.refl _) A) = A :=
by { ext, simp only [reindex_apply, equiv.refl_symm, equiv.refl_apply] }
/-- The natural map that reindexes a matrix's rows and columns with equivalent types is a linear
equivalence. -/
def reindex_linear_equiv [semiring R] (eₘ : m ≃ m') (eₙ : n ≃ n') :
matrix m n R ≃ₗ[R] matrix m' n' R :=
{ map_add' := λ M N, rfl,
map_smul' := λ M N, rfl,
..(reindex eₘ eₙ)}
@[simp] lemma coe_reindex_linear_equiv [semiring R]
(eₘ : m ≃ m') (eₙ : n ≃ n') (M : matrix m n R) :
reindex_linear_equiv eₘ eₙ M = λ i j, M (eₘ.symm i) (eₙ.symm j) :=
rfl
lemma reindex_linear_equiv_apply [semiring R]
(eₘ : m ≃ m') (eₙ : n ≃ n') (M : matrix m n R) (i j) :
reindex_linear_equiv eₘ eₙ M i j = M (eₘ.symm i) (eₙ.symm j) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_reindex_linear_equiv_symm [semiring R]
(eₘ : m ≃ m') (eₙ : n ≃ n') (M : matrix m' n' R) :
(reindex_linear_equiv eₘ eₙ).symm M = λ i j, M (eₘ i) (eₙ j) :=
rfl
lemma reindex_linear_equiv_symm_apply [semiring R]
(eₘ : m ≃ m') (eₙ : n ≃ n') (M : matrix m' n' R) (i j) :
(reindex_linear_equiv eₘ eₙ).symm M i j = M (eₘ i) (eₙ j) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma reindex_linear_equiv_refl_refl [semiring R] (A : matrix m n R) :
(reindex_linear_equiv (equiv.refl _) (equiv.refl _) A) = A :=
reindex_refl_refl A
lemma reindex_mul [semiring R]
(eₘ : m ≃ m') (eₙ : n ≃ n') (eₗ : l ≃ l') (M : matrix m n R) (N : matrix n l R) :
(reindex_linear_equiv eₘ eₙ M) ⬝ (reindex_linear_equiv eₙ eₗ N) =
reindex_linear_equiv eₘ eₗ (M ⬝ N) :=
begin
ext i j,
dsimp only [matrix.mul, matrix.dot_product],
rw [←finset.univ_map_equiv_to_embedding eₙ, finset.sum_map finset.univ eₙ.to_embedding],
simp,
end
/-- For square matrices, the natural map that reindexes a matrix's rows and columns with equivalent
types is an equivalence of algebras. -/
def reindex_alg_equiv [comm_semiring R] [decidable_eq m] [decidable_eq n]
(e : m ≃ n) : matrix m m R ≃ₐ[R] matrix n n R :=
{ map_mul' := λ M N, by simp only [reindex_mul, linear_equiv.to_fun_eq_coe, mul_eq_mul],
commutes' := λ r,
by { ext, simp [algebra_map, algebra.to_ring_hom], by_cases h : i = j; simp [h], },
..(reindex_linear_equiv e e) }
@[simp] lemma coe_reindex_alg_equiv [comm_semiring R] [decidable_eq m] [decidable_eq n]
(e : m ≃ n) (M : matrix m m R) :
reindex_alg_equiv e M = λ i j, M (e.symm i) (e.symm j) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma reindex_alg_equiv_apply [comm_semiring R] [decidable_eq m] [decidable_eq n]
(e : m ≃ n) (M : matrix m m R) (i j) :
reindex_alg_equiv e M i j = M (e.symm i) (e.symm j) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_reindex_alg_equiv_symm [comm_semiring R] [decidable_eq m] [decidable_eq n]
(e : m ≃ n) (M : matrix n n R) :
(reindex_alg_equiv e).symm M = λ i j, M (e i) (e j) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma reindex_alg_equiv_symm_apply [comm_semiring R] [decidable_eq m] [decidable_eq n]
(e : m ≃ n) (M : matrix n n R) (i j):
(reindex_alg_equiv e).symm M i j = M (e i) (e j) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma reindex_alg_equiv_refl [comm_semiring R] [decidable_eq m]
(A : matrix m m R) : (reindex_alg_equiv (equiv.refl m) A) = A :=
reindex_linear_equiv_refl_refl A
lemma reindex_transpose (eₘ : m ≃ m') (eₙ : n ≃ n') (M : matrix m n R) :
(reindex eₘ eₙ M)ᵀ = (reindex eₙ eₘ Mᵀ) :=
rfl
/-- `simp` version of `det_reindex_self`
`det_reindex_self` is not a good simp lemma because `reindex_apply` fires before.
So we have this lemma to continue from there. -/
@[simp]
lemma det_reindex_self' [decidable_eq m] [decidable_eq n] [comm_ring R]
(e : m ≃ n) (A : matrix m m R) :
det (λ i j, A (e.symm i) (e.symm j)) = det A :=
begin
rw [det_apply', det_apply'],
apply finset.sum_bij' (λ σ _, equiv.perm_congr e.symm σ) _ _ (λ σ _, equiv.perm_congr e σ),
{ intros σ _, ext, simp only [equiv.symm_symm, equiv.perm_congr_apply, equiv.apply_symm_apply] },
{ intros σ _, ext, simp only [equiv.symm_symm, equiv.perm_congr_apply, equiv.symm_apply_apply] },
{ intros σ _, apply finset.mem_univ },
{ intros σ _, apply finset.mem_univ },
intros σ _,
simp_rw [equiv.perm_congr_apply, equiv.symm_symm],
congr,
{ convert (equiv.perm.sign_perm_congr e.symm σ).symm },
apply finset.prod_bij' (λ i _, e.symm i) _ _ (λ i _, e i),
{ intros, simp_rw equiv.apply_symm_apply },
{ intros, simp_rw equiv.symm_apply_apply },
{ intros, apply finset.mem_univ },
{ intros, apply finset.mem_univ },
{ intros, simp_rw equiv.apply_symm_apply },
end
/-- Reindexing both indices along the same equivalence preserves the determinant.
For the `simp` version of this lemma, see `det_reindex_self'`.
-/
lemma det_reindex_self [decidable_eq m] [decidable_eq n] [comm_ring R]
(e : m ≃ n) (A : matrix m m R) :
det (reindex e e A) = det A :=
det_reindex_self' e A
/-- Reindexing both indices along the same equivalence preserves the determinant.
For the `simp` version of this lemma, see `det_reindex_self'`.
-/
lemma det_reindex_linear_equiv_self [decidable_eq m] [decidable_eq n] [comm_ring R]
(e : m ≃ n) (A : matrix m m R) :
det (reindex_linear_equiv e e A) = det A :=
det_reindex_self' e A
/-- Reindexing both indices along the same equivalence preserves the determinant.
For the `simp` version of this lemma, see `det_reindex_self'`.
-/
lemma det_reindex_alg_equiv [decidable_eq m] [decidable_eq n] [comm_ring R]
(e : m ≃ n) (A : matrix m m R) :
det (reindex_alg_equiv e A) = det A :=
det_reindex_self' e A
end reindexing
end matrix
namespace linear_map
open_locale matrix
/-- The trace of an endomorphism given a basis. -/
def trace_aux (R : Type u) [comm_ring R] {M : Type v} [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
{ι : Type w} [decidable_eq ι] [fintype ι] {b : ι → M} (hb : is_basis R b) :
(M →ₗ[R] M) →ₗ[R] R :=
(matrix.trace ι R R).comp $ linear_map.to_matrix hb hb
@[simp] lemma trace_aux_def (R : Type u) [comm_ring R] {M : Type v} [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
{ι : Type w} [decidable_eq ι] [fintype ι] {b : ι → M} (hb : is_basis R b) (f : M →ₗ[R] M) :
trace_aux R hb f = matrix.trace ι R R (linear_map.to_matrix hb hb f) :=
rfl
theorem trace_aux_eq' (R : Type u) [comm_ring R] {M : Type v} [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
{ι : Type w} [decidable_eq ι] [fintype ι] {b : ι → M} (hb : is_basis R b)
{κ : Type w} [decidable_eq κ] [fintype κ] {c : κ → M} (hc : is_basis R c) :
trace_aux R hb = trace_aux R hc :=
linear_map.ext $ λ f,
calc matrix.trace ι R R (linear_map.to_matrix hb hb f)
= matrix.trace ι R R (linear_map.to_matrix hb hb ((linear_map.id.comp f).comp linear_map.id)) :
by rw [linear_map.id_comp, linear_map.comp_id]
... = matrix.trace ι R R (linear_map.to_matrix hc hb linear_map.id ⬝
linear_map.to_matrix hc hc f ⬝
linear_map.to_matrix hb hc linear_map.id) :
by rw [linear_map.to_matrix_comp _ hc, linear_map.to_matrix_comp _ hc]
... = matrix.trace κ R R (linear_map.to_matrix hc hc f ⬝
linear_map.to_matrix hb hc linear_map.id ⬝
linear_map.to_matrix hc hb linear_map.id) :
by rw [matrix.mul_assoc, matrix.trace_mul_comm]
... = matrix.trace κ R R (linear_map.to_matrix hc hc ((f.comp linear_map.id).comp linear_map.id)) :
by rw [linear_map.to_matrix_comp _ hb, linear_map.to_matrix_comp _ hc]
... = matrix.trace κ R R (linear_map.to_matrix hc hc f) :
by rw [linear_map.comp_id, linear_map.comp_id]
open_locale classical
theorem trace_aux_range (R : Type u) [comm_ring R] {M : Type v} [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
{ι : Type w} [decidable_eq ι] [fintype ι] {b : ι → M} (hb : is_basis R b) :
trace_aux R hb.range = trace_aux R hb :=
linear_map.ext $ λ f, if H : 0 = 1 then eq_of_zero_eq_one H _ _ else
begin
haveI : nontrivial R := ⟨⟨0, 1, H⟩⟩,
change ∑ i : set.range b, _ = ∑ i : ι, _, simp_rw [matrix.diag_apply], symmetry,
convert (equiv.of_injective _ hb.injective).sum_comp _, ext i,
exact (linear_map.to_matrix_range hb hb f i i).symm
end
/-- where `ι` and `κ` can reside in different universes -/
theorem trace_aux_eq (R : Type u) [comm_ring R] {M : Type v} [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
{ι : Type*} [decidable_eq ι] [fintype ι] {b : ι → M} (hb : is_basis R b)
{κ : Type*} [decidable_eq κ] [fintype κ] {c : κ → M} (hc : is_basis R c) :
trace_aux R hb = trace_aux R hc :=
calc trace_aux R hb
= trace_aux R hb.range : by rw trace_aux_range R hb
... = trace_aux R hc.range : trace_aux_eq' _ _ _
... = trace_aux R hc : by rw trace_aux_range R hc
/-- Trace of an endomorphism independent of basis. -/
def trace (R : Type u) [comm_ring R] (M : Type v) [add_comm_group M] [module R M] :
(M →ₗ[R] M) →ₗ[R] R :=
if H : ∃ s : finset M, is_basis R (λ x, x : (↑s : set M) → M)
then trace_aux R (classical.some_spec H)
else 0
theorem trace_eq_matrix_trace (R : Type u) [comm_ring R] {M : Type v} [add_comm_group M]
[module R M] {ι : Type w} [fintype ι] [decidable_eq ι] {b : ι → M} (hb : is_basis R b)
(f : M →ₗ[R] M) : trace R M f = matrix.trace ι R R (linear_map.to_matrix hb hb f) :=
have ∃ s : finset M, is_basis R (λ x, x : (↑s : set M) → M),
from ⟨finset.univ.image b,
by { rw [finset.coe_image, finset.coe_univ, set.image_univ], exact hb.range }⟩,
by { rw [trace, dif_pos this, ← trace_aux_def], congr' 1, apply trace_aux_eq }
theorem trace_mul_comm (R : Type u) [comm_ring R] {M : Type v} [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
(f g : M →ₗ[R] M) : trace R M (f * g) = trace R M (g * f) :=
if H : ∃ s : finset M, is_basis R (λ x, x : (↑s : set M) → M) then let ⟨s, hb⟩ := H in
by { simp_rw [trace_eq_matrix_trace R hb, linear_map.to_matrix_mul], apply matrix.trace_mul_comm }
else by rw [trace, dif_neg H, linear_map.zero_apply, linear_map.zero_apply]
section finite_dimensional
variables {K : Type*} [field K]
variables {V : Type*} [add_comm_group V] [vector_space K V] [finite_dimensional K V]
variables {W : Type*} [add_comm_group W] [vector_space K W] [finite_dimensional K W]
instance : finite_dimensional K (V →ₗ[K] W) :=
begin
classical,
cases finite_dimensional.exists_is_basis_finset K V with bV hbV,
cases finite_dimensional.exists_is_basis_finset K W with bW hbW,
apply linear_equiv.finite_dimensional (linear_map.to_matrix hbV hbW).symm,
end
/--
The dimension of the space of linear transformations is the product of the dimensions of the
domain and codomain.
-/
@[simp] lemma findim_linear_map :
finite_dimensional.findim K (V →ₗ[K] W) =
(finite_dimensional.findim K V) * (finite_dimensional.findim K W) :=
begin
classical,
cases finite_dimensional.exists_is_basis_finset K V with bV hbV,
cases finite_dimensional.exists_is_basis_finset K W with bW hbW,
rw [linear_equiv.findim_eq (linear_map.to_matrix hbV hbW), matrix.findim_matrix,
finite_dimensional.findim_eq_card_basis hbV, finite_dimensional.findim_eq_card_basis hbW,
mul_comm],
end
end finite_dimensional
end linear_map
/-- The natural equivalence between linear endomorphisms of finite free modules and square matrices
is compatible with the algebra structures. -/
def alg_equiv_matrix' {R : Type v} [comm_ring R] {n : Type*} [fintype n] [decidable_eq n] :
module.End R (n → R) ≃ₐ[R] matrix n n R :=
{ map_mul' := linear_map.to_matrix'_comp,
map_add' := linear_map.to_matrix'.map_add,
commutes' := λ r, by { change (r • (linear_map.id : module.End R _)).to_matrix' = r • 1,
rw ←linear_map.to_matrix'_id, refl, },
..linear_map.to_matrix' }
/-- A linear equivalence of two modules induces an equivalence of algebras of their
endomorphisms. -/
def linear_equiv.alg_conj {R : Type v} [comm_ring R] {M₁ M₂ : Type*}
[add_comm_group M₁] [module R M₁] [add_comm_group M₂] [module R M₂] (e : M₁ ≃ₗ[R] M₂) :
module.End R M₁ ≃ₐ[R] module.End R M₂ :=
{ map_mul' := λ f g, by apply e.arrow_congr_comp,
map_add' := e.conj.map_add,
commutes' := λ r, by { change e.conj (r • linear_map.id) = r • linear_map.id,
rw [linear_equiv.map_smul, linear_equiv.conj_id], },
..e.conj }
/-- A basis of a module induces an equivalence of algebras from the endomorphisms of the module to
square matrices. -/
def alg_equiv_matrix {R : Type v} {M : Type w} {n : Type*} [fintype n]
[comm_ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M] [decidable_eq n] {b : n → M} (h : is_basis R b) :
module.End R M ≃ₐ[R] matrix n n R :=
h.equiv_fun.alg_conj.trans alg_equiv_matrix'
section
variables {R : Type v} [semiring R] {n : Type w} [fintype n]
@[simp] lemma matrix.dot_product_std_basis_eq_mul [decidable_eq n] (v : n → R) (c : R) (i : n) :
matrix.dot_product v (linear_map.std_basis R (λ _, R) i c) = v i * c :=
begin
rw [matrix.dot_product, finset.sum_eq_single i, linear_map.std_basis_same],
exact λ _ _ hb, by rw [linear_map.std_basis_ne _ _ _ _ hb, mul_zero],
exact λ hi, false.elim (hi $ finset.mem_univ _)
end
@[simp] lemma matrix.dot_product_std_basis_one [decidable_eq n] (v : n → R) (i : n) :
matrix.dot_product v (linear_map.std_basis R (λ _, R) i 1) = v i :=
by rw [matrix.dot_product_std_basis_eq_mul, mul_one]
lemma matrix.dot_product_eq
(v w : n → R) (h : ∀ u, matrix.dot_product v u = matrix.dot_product w u) : v = w :=
begin
funext x,
classical,
rw [← matrix.dot_product_std_basis_one v x, ← matrix.dot_product_std_basis_one w x, h],
end
lemma matrix.dot_product_eq_iff {v w : n → R} :
(∀ u, matrix.dot_product v u = matrix.dot_product w u) ↔ v = w :=
⟨λ h, matrix.dot_product_eq v w h, λ h _, h ▸ rfl⟩
lemma matrix.dot_product_eq_zero (v : n → R) (h : ∀ w, matrix.dot_product v w = 0) : v = 0 :=
matrix.dot_product_eq _ _ $ λ u, (h u).symm ▸ (zero_dot_product u).symm
lemma matrix.dot_product_eq_zero_iff {v : n → R} : (∀ w, matrix.dot_product v w = 0) ↔ v = 0 :=
⟨λ h, matrix.dot_product_eq_zero v h, λ h w, h.symm ▸ zero_dot_product w⟩
end
namespace matrix
variables {m n : Type*} [decidable_eq n] [fintype n] [decidable_eq m] [fintype m]
variables {R : Type v} [comm_ring R]
lemma det_to_block (M : matrix m m R) (p : m → Prop) [decidable_pred p] :
M.det = (matrix.from_blocks (to_block M p p) (to_block M p (λ j, ¬p j))
(to_block M (λ j, ¬p j) p) (to_block M (λ j, ¬p j) (λ j, ¬p j))).det :=
begin
rw ← matrix.det_reindex_self (equiv.sum_compl p).symm M,
rw [det_apply', det_apply'],
congr, ext σ, congr, ext,
generalize hy : σ x = y,
cases x; cases y;
simp only [matrix.reindex_apply, to_block_apply, equiv.symm_symm,
equiv.sum_compl_apply_inr, equiv.sum_compl_apply_inl,
from_blocks_apply₁₁, from_blocks_apply₁₂, from_blocks_apply₂₁, from_blocks_apply₂₂],
end
lemma det_to_square_block (M : matrix m m R) {n : nat} (b : m → fin n) (k : fin n) :
(to_square_block M b k).det = (to_square_block_prop M (λ i, b i = k)).det :=
by simp
lemma det_to_square_block' (M : matrix m m R) (b : m → ℕ) (k : ℕ) :
(to_square_block' M b k).det = (to_square_block_prop M (λ i, b i = k)).det :=
by simp
lemma two_block_triangular_det (M : matrix m m R) (p : m → Prop) [decidable_pred p]
(h : ∀ i (h1 : ¬p i) j (h2 : p j), M i j = 0) :
M.det = (to_square_block_prop M p).det * (to_square_block_prop M (λ i, ¬p i)).det :=
begin
rw det_to_block M p,
convert upper_two_block_triangular_det (to_block M p p) (to_block M p (λ j, ¬p j))
(to_block M (λ j, ¬p j) (λ j, ¬p j)),
ext,
exact h ↑i i.2 ↑j j.2
end
lemma equiv_block_det (M : matrix m m R) {p q : m → Prop} [decidable_pred p] [decidable_pred q]
(e : ∀x, q x ↔ p x) : (to_square_block_prop M p).det = (to_square_block_prop M q).det :=
by convert matrix.det_reindex_self (equiv.subtype_equiv_right e) (to_square_block_prop M q)
lemma to_square_block_det'' (M : matrix m m R) {n : nat} (b : m → fin n) (k : fin n) :
(to_square_block M b k).det = (to_square_block' M (λ i, ↑(b i)) ↑k).det :=
begin
rw [to_square_block_def', to_square_block_def],
apply equiv_block_det,
intro x,
apply (fin.ext_iff _ _).symm
end
/-- Let `b` map rows and columns of a square matrix `M` to `n` blocks. Then
`block_triangular_matrix' M n b` says the matrix is block triangular. -/
def block_triangular_matrix' {o : Type*} [fintype o] (M : matrix o o R) {n : ℕ}
(b : o → fin n) : Prop :=
∀ i j, b j < b i → M i j = 0
lemma upper_two_block_triangular' {m n : Type*} [fintype m] [fintype n]
(A : matrix m m R) (B : matrix m n R) (D : matrix n n R) :
block_triangular_matrix' (from_blocks A B 0 D) (sum.elim (λ i, (0 : fin 2)) (λ j, 1)) :=
begin
intros k1 k2 hk12,
have h0 : ∀ (k : m ⊕ n), sum.elim (λ i, (0 : fin 2)) (λ j, 1) k = 0 → ∃ i, k = sum.inl i,
{ simp },
have h1 : ∀ (k : m ⊕ n), sum.elim (λ i, (0 : fin 2)) (λ j, 1) k = 1 → ∃ j, k = sum.inr j,
{ simp },
set mk1 := (sum.elim (λ i, (0 : fin 2)) (λ j, 1)) k1 with hmk1,
set mk2 := (sum.elim (λ i, (0 : fin 2)) (λ j, 1)) k2 with hmk2,
fin_cases mk1; fin_cases mk2; rw [h, h_1] at hk12,
{ exact absurd hk12 (nat.not_lt_zero 0) },
{ exact absurd hk12 (nat.not_lt_zero 1) },
{ rw hmk1 at h,
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := h1 k1 h,
rw hmk2 at h_1,
obtain ⟨j, hj⟩ := h0 k2 h_1,
rw [hi, hj], simp },
{ exact absurd hk12 (irrefl 1) }
end
/-- Let `b` map rows and columns of a square matrix `M` to blocks indexed by `ℕ`s. Then
`block_triangular_matrix M n b` says the matrix is block triangular. -/
def block_triangular_matrix {o : Type*} [fintype o] (M : matrix o o R) (b : o → ℕ) : Prop :=
∀ i j, b j < b i → M i j = 0
lemma upper_two_block_triangular {m n : Type*} [fintype m] [fintype n]
(A : matrix m m R) (B : matrix m n R) (D : matrix n n R) :
block_triangular_matrix (from_blocks A B 0 D) (sum.elim (λ i, 0) (λ j, 1)) :=
begin
intros k1 k2 hk12,
have h01 : ∀ (k : m ⊕ n), sum.elim (λ i, 0) (λ j, 1) k = 0 ∨ sum.elim (λ i, 0) (λ j, 1) k = 1,
{ simp },
have h0 : ∀ (k : m ⊕ n), sum.elim (λ i, 0) (λ j, 1) k = 0 → ∃ i, k = sum.inl i, { simp },
have h1 : ∀ (k : m ⊕ n), sum.elim (λ i, 0) (λ j, 1) k = 1 → ∃ j, k = sum.inr j, { simp },
cases (h01 k1) with hk1 hk1; cases (h01 k2) with hk2 hk2; rw [hk1, hk2] at hk12,
{ exact absurd hk12 (nat.not_lt_zero 0) },
{ exact absurd hk12 (nat.not_lt_zero 1) },
{ obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := h1 k1 hk1,
obtain ⟨j, hj⟩ := h0 k2 hk2,
rw [hi, hj], simp },
{ exact absurd hk12 (irrefl 1) }
end
lemma det_of_block_triangular_matrix (M : matrix m m R) (b : m → ℕ)
(h : block_triangular_matrix M b) :
∀ (n : ℕ) (hn : ∀ i, b i < n), M.det = ∏ k in finset.range n, (to_square_block' M b k).det :=
begin
intros n hn,
tactic.unfreeze_local_instances,
induction n with n hi generalizing m M b,
{ rw finset.prod_range_zero,
apply det_eq_one_of_card_eq_zero,
apply fintype.card_eq_zero_iff.mpr,
intro i,
exact nat.not_lt_zero (b i) (hn i) },
{ rw finset.prod_range_succ,
have h2 : (M.to_square_block_prop (λ (i : m), b i = n.succ)).det =
(M.to_square_block' b n.succ).det,
{ dunfold to_square_block', dunfold to_square_block_prop, refl },
rw two_block_triangular_det M (λ i, ¬(b i = n)),
{ rw mul_comm,
apply congr (congr_arg has_mul.mul _),
{ let m' := {a // ¬b a = n },
let b' := (λ (i : m'), b ↑i),
have h' :
block_triangular_matrix (M.to_square_block_prop (λ (i : m), ¬b i = n)) b',
{ intros i j, apply h ↑i ↑j },
have hni : ∀ (i : {a // ¬b a = n}), b' i < n,
{ exact λ i, (ne.le_iff_lt i.property).mp (nat.lt_succ_iff.mp (hn ↑i)) },
have h1 := hi (M.to_square_block_prop (λ (i : m), ¬b i = n)) b' h' hni,
rw ←fin.prod_univ_eq_prod_range at h1 ⊢,
convert h1,
ext k,
simp only [to_square_block_def', to_square_block_def],
let he : {a // b' a = ↑k} ≃ {a // b a = ↑k},
{ have hc : ∀ (i : m), (λ a, b a = ↑k) i → (λ a, ¬b a = n) i,
{ intros i hbi, rw hbi, exact ne_of_lt (fin.is_lt k) },
exact equiv.subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype hc },
exact matrix.det_reindex_self he (λ (i j : {a // b' a = ↑k}), M ↑i ↑j) },
{ rw det_to_square_block' M b n,
have hh : ∀ a, b a = n ↔ ¬(λ (i : m), ¬b i = n) a,
{ intro i, simp only [not_not] },
exact equiv_block_det M hh }},
{ intros i hi j hj,
apply (h i), simp only [not_not] at hi,
rw hi,
exact (ne.le_iff_lt hj).mp (nat.lt_succ_iff.mp (hn j)) }}
end
lemma det_of_block_triangular_matrix'' (M : matrix m m R) (b : m → ℕ)
(h : block_triangular_matrix M b) :
M.det = ∏ k in finset.image b finset.univ, (to_square_block' M b k).det :=
begin
let n : ℕ := (Sup (finset.image b finset.univ : set ℕ)).succ,
have hn : ∀ i, b i < n,
{ have hbi : ∀ i, b i ∈ finset.image b finset.univ, { simp },
intro i,
dsimp only [n],
apply nat.lt_succ_iff.mpr,
exact le_cSup (finset.bdd_above _) (hbi i) },
rw det_of_block_triangular_matrix M b h n hn,
refine (finset.prod_subset _ _).symm,
{ intros a ha, apply finset.mem_range.mpr,
obtain ⟨i, ⟨hi, hbi⟩⟩ := finset.mem_image.mp ha,
rw ←hbi,
exact hn i },
{ intros k hk hbk,
apply det_eq_one_of_card_eq_zero,
apply fintype.card_eq_zero_iff.mpr,
simp only [subtype.forall],
intros a hba, apply hbk,
apply finset.mem_image.mpr,
use a,
exact ⟨finset.mem_univ a, hba⟩ }
end
lemma det_of_block_triangular_matrix' (M : matrix m m R) {n : ℕ} (b : m → fin n)
(h : block_triangular_matrix' M b) :
M.det = ∏ (k : fin n), (to_square_block M b k).det :=
begin
let b2 : m → ℕ := λ i, ↑(b i),
simp_rw to_square_block_det'',
rw fin.prod_univ_eq_prod_range (λ (k : ℕ), (M.to_square_block' b2 k).det) n,
apply det_of_block_triangular_matrix,
{ intros i j hij, exact h i j (fin.coe_fin_lt.mp hij) },
{ intro i, exact fin.is_lt (b i) }
end
lemma det_of_upper_triangular {n : ℕ} (M : matrix (fin n) (fin n) R)
(h : ∀ (i j : fin n), j < i → M i j = 0) :
M.det = ∏ i : (fin n), M i i :=
begin
convert det_of_block_triangular_matrix' M id h,
ext i,
have h2 : ∀ (j : {a // id a = i}), j = ⟨i, rfl⟩ :=
λ (j : {a // id a = i}), subtype.ext j.property,
haveI : unique {a // id a = i} := ⟨⟨⟨i, rfl⟩⟩, h2⟩,
simp [h2 (default {a // id a = i})]
end
lemma det_of_lower_triangular {n : ℕ} (M : matrix (fin n) (fin n) R)
(h : ∀ (i j : fin n), i < j → M i j = 0) :
M.det = ∏ i : (fin n), M i i :=
begin
rw ← det_transpose,
exact det_of_upper_triangular _ (λ (i j : fin n) (hji : j < i), h j i hji)
end
end matrix
|
829c58bb6ff890eb2a9671d39c3459d9bb5b5427 | 43390109ab88557e6090f3245c47479c123ee500 | /src/M1F/problem_bank/0103/S0103.lean | 7361dcf3a011eb06e2077814574ce2dfa8003252 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Ja1941/xena-UROP-2018 | 41f0956519f94d56b8bf6834a8d39473f4923200 | b111fb87f343cf79eca3b886f99ee15c1dd9884b | refs/heads/master | 1,662,355,955,139 | 1,590,577,325,000 | 1,590,577,325,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,165 | lean | /-
M1F 2017-18 Sheet 1 Question 2 to 4 solutions.
Author : Kevin Buzzard
This file should work with any version of lean -- whether you installed it yourself
or are running the version on https://leanprover.github.io/live/latest/
-/
-- We probably need the "law of the excluded middle" for this question -- every
-- proposition is either true or false! Don't even ask me to explain what the
-- other options are, but Lean does not come with this axiom by default (blame
-- the computer scientists) and mathematicians have to add it themselves.
-- It's easy to add though. "em" for excluded middle.
axiom em (X : Prop) : X ∨ ¬ X
variables P Q R S : Prop -- A "Prop" is a proposition, that is, a true/false statement.
-- Sheet 1 Q3. Prove one result and delete the other.
-- theorem m1f_sheet01_q03_is_T (HP : P) (HnQ : ¬ Q) (HnR : ¬ R) (HS : S) : (R → S) → (P → Q) :=
theorem m1f_sheet01_q03_is_F (HP : P) (HnQ : ¬ Q) (HnR : ¬ R) (HS : S) : ¬ ((R → S) → (P → Q)) :=
begin
intro H,
have HRS : R → S,
intro HR,
contradiction,
have HPQ : P → Q,
exact H HRS,
have HQ : Q,
exact HPQ HP,
-- now we have Q and not Q
contradiction,
end
|
ff260a15c42217ee3bfb6d23ed477855da8c28cd | 86f6f4f8d827a196a32bfc646234b73328aeb306 | /examples/introduction/unnamed_266.lean | a1cffc1fcb8bc1f1d33c4dca266d0a2c7dbd6962 | [] | no_license | jamescheuk91/mathematics_in_lean | 09f1f87d2b0dce53464ff0cbe592c568ff59cf5e | 4452499264e2975bca2f42565c0925506ba5dda3 | refs/heads/master | 1,679,716,410,967 | 1,613,957,947,000 | 1,613,957,947,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 143 | lean | import data.nat.parity tactic
open nat
-- BEGIN
example : ∀ m n : nat, even n → even (m * n) :=
by intros; simp * with parity_simps
-- END |
26dc9557d9b6cd1ae6afd9690f61f5776c2e7054 | 2a70b774d16dbdf5a533432ee0ebab6838df0948 | /_target/deps/mathlib/src/set_theory/ordinal_notation.lean | 3adbb35589c0c1ae9d51d799e3dae1e10c6676c6 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | hjvromen/lewis | 40b035973df7c77ebf927afab7878c76d05ff758 | 105b675f73630f028ad5d890897a51b3c1146fb0 | refs/heads/master | 1,677,944,636,343 | 1,676,555,301,000 | 1,676,555,301,000 | 327,553,599 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 35,268 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Mario Carneiro
-/
import set_theory.ordinal_arithmetic
/-!
# Ordinal notations
constructive ordinal arithmetic for ordinals `< ε₀`.
-/
open ordinal
open_locale ordinal -- get notation for `ω`
/-- Recursive definition of an ordinal notation. `zero` denotes the
ordinal 0, and `oadd e n a` is intended to refer to `ω^e * n + a`.
For this to be valid Cantor normal form, we must have the exponents
decrease to the right, but we can't state this condition until we've
defined `repr`, so it is a separate definition `NF`. -/
@[derive decidable_eq]
inductive onote : Type
| zero : onote
| oadd : onote → ℕ+ → onote → onote
namespace onote
/-- Notation for 0 -/
instance : has_zero onote := ⟨zero⟩
@[simp] theorem zero_def : zero = 0 := rfl
instance : inhabited onote := ⟨0⟩
/-- Notation for 1 -/
instance : has_one onote := ⟨oadd 0 1 0⟩
/-- Notation for ω -/
def omega : onote := oadd 1 1 0
/-- The ordinal denoted by a notation -/
@[simp] noncomputable def repr : onote → ordinal.{0}
| 0 := 0
| (oadd e n a) := ω ^ repr e * n + repr a
/-- Auxiliary definition to print an ordinal notation -/
def to_string_aux1 (e : onote) (n : ℕ) (s : string) : string :=
if e = 0 then _root_.to_string n else
(if e = 1 then "ω" else "ω^(" ++ s ++ ")") ++
if n = 1 then "" else "*" ++ _root_.to_string n
/-- Print an ordinal notation -/
def to_string : onote → string
| zero := "0"
| (oadd e n 0) := to_string_aux1 e n (to_string e)
| (oadd e n a) := to_string_aux1 e n (to_string e) ++ " + " ++ to_string a
/-- Print an ordinal notation -/
def repr' : onote → string
| zero := "0"
| (oadd e n a) := "(oadd " ++ repr' e ++ " " ++ _root_.to_string (n:ℕ) ++ " " ++ repr' a ++ ")"
instance : has_to_string onote := ⟨to_string⟩
instance : has_repr onote := ⟨repr'⟩
instance : preorder onote :=
{ le := λ x y, repr x ≤ repr y,
lt := λ x y, repr x < repr y,
le_refl := λ a, @le_refl ordinal _ _,
le_trans := λ a b c, @le_trans ordinal _ _ _ _,
lt_iff_le_not_le := λ a b, @lt_iff_le_not_le ordinal _ _ _ }
theorem lt_def {x y : onote} : x < y ↔ repr x < repr y := iff.rfl
theorem le_def {x y : onote} : x ≤ y ↔ repr x ≤ repr y := iff.rfl
/-- Convert a `nat` into an ordinal -/
@[simp] def of_nat : ℕ → onote
| 0 := 0
| (nat.succ n) := oadd 0 n.succ_pnat 0
@[simp] theorem of_nat_one : of_nat 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem repr_of_nat (n : ℕ) : repr (of_nat n) = n :=
by cases n; simp
@[simp] theorem repr_one : repr 1 = 1 :=
by simpa using repr_of_nat 1
theorem omega_le_oadd (e n a) : ω ^ repr e ≤ repr (oadd e n a) :=
begin
unfold repr,
refine le_trans _ (le_add_right _ _),
simpa using (mul_le_mul_iff_left $ power_pos (repr e) omega_pos).2 (nat_cast_le.2 n.2)
end
theorem oadd_pos (e n a) : 0 < oadd e n a :=
@lt_of_lt_of_le _ _ _ _ _ (power_pos _ omega_pos)
(omega_le_oadd _ _ _)
/-- Compare ordinal notations -/
def cmp : onote → onote → ordering
| 0 0 := ordering.eq
| _ 0 := ordering.gt
| 0 _ := ordering.lt
| o₁@(oadd e₁ n₁ a₁) o₂@(oadd e₂ n₂ a₂) :=
(cmp e₁ e₂).or_else $ (_root_.cmp (n₁:ℕ) n₂).or_else (cmp a₁ a₂)
theorem eq_of_cmp_eq : ∀ {o₁ o₂}, cmp o₁ o₂ = ordering.eq → o₁ = o₂
| 0 0 h := rfl
| (oadd e n a) 0 h := by injection h
| 0 (oadd e n a) h := by injection h
| o₁@(oadd e₁ n₁ a₁) o₂@(oadd e₂ n₂ a₂) h := begin
revert h, simp [cmp],
cases h₁ : cmp e₁ e₂; intro h; try {cases h},
have := eq_of_cmp_eq h₁, subst e₂,
revert h, cases h₂ : _root_.cmp (n₁:ℕ) n₂; intro h; try {cases h},
have := eq_of_cmp_eq h, subst a₂,
rw [_root_.cmp, cmp_using_eq_eq] at h₂,
have := subtype.eq (eq_of_incomp h₂), subst n₂, simp
end
theorem zero_lt_one : (0 : onote) < 1 :=
by rw [lt_def, repr, repr_one]; exact zero_lt_one
/-- `NF_below o b` says that `o` is a normal form ordinal notation
satisfying `repr o < ω ^ b`. -/
inductive NF_below : onote → ordinal.{0} → Prop
| zero {b} : NF_below 0 b
| oadd' {e n a eb b} : NF_below e eb →
NF_below a (repr e) → repr e < b → NF_below (oadd e n a) b
/-- A normal form ordinal notation has the form
ω ^ a₁ * n₁ + ω ^ a₂ * n₂ + ... ω ^ aₖ * nₖ
where `a₁ > a₂ > ... > aₖ` and all the `aᵢ` are
also in normal form.
We will essentially only be interested in normal form
ordinal notations, but to avoid complicating the algorithms
we define everything over general ordinal notations and
only prove correctness with normal form as an invariant. -/
@[class, pp_nodot] def NF (o : onote) := Exists (NF_below o)
instance NF.zero : NF 0 := ⟨0, NF_below.zero⟩
theorem NF_below.oadd {e n a b} : NF e →
NF_below a (repr e) → repr e < b → NF_below (oadd e n a) b
| ⟨eb, h⟩ := NF_below.oadd' h
theorem NF_below.fst {e n a b} (h : NF_below (oadd e n a) b) : NF e :=
by cases h with _ _ _ _ eb _ h₁ h₂ h₃; exact ⟨_, h₁⟩
theorem NF.fst {e n a} : NF (oadd e n a) → NF e
| ⟨b, h⟩ := h.fst
theorem NF_below.snd {e n a b} (h : NF_below (oadd e n a) b) : NF_below a (repr e) :=
by cases h with _ _ _ _ eb _ h₁ h₂ h₃; exact h₂
theorem NF.snd' {e n a} : NF (oadd e n a) → NF_below a (repr e)
| ⟨b, h⟩ := h.snd
theorem NF.snd {e n a} (h : NF (oadd e n a)) : NF a :=
⟨_, h.snd'⟩
theorem NF.oadd {e a} (h₁ : NF e) (n)
(h₂ : NF_below a (repr e)) : NF (oadd e n a) :=
⟨_, NF_below.oadd h₁ h₂ (ordinal.lt_succ_self _)⟩
instance NF.oadd_zero (e n) [h : NF e] : NF (oadd e n 0) :=
h.oadd _ NF_below.zero
theorem NF_below.lt {e n a b} (h : NF_below (oadd e n a) b) : repr e < b :=
by cases h with _ _ _ _ eb _ h₁ h₂ h₃; exact h₃
theorem NF_below_zero : ∀ {o}, NF_below o 0 ↔ o = 0
| 0 := ⟨λ _, rfl, λ _, NF_below.zero⟩
| (oadd e n a) := ⟨λ h, (not_le_of_lt h.lt).elim (ordinal.zero_le _),
λ e, e.symm ▸ NF_below.zero⟩
theorem NF.zero_of_zero {e n a} (h : NF (oadd e n a)) (e0 : e = 0) : a = 0 :=
by simpa [e0, NF_below_zero] using h.snd'
theorem NF_below.repr_lt {o b} (h : NF_below o b) : repr o < ω ^ b :=
begin
induction h with _ e n a eb b h₁ h₂ h₃ _ IH,
{ exact power_pos _ omega_pos },
{ rw repr,
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ((ordinal.add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 IH) _,
rw ← mul_succ,
refine le_trans (mul_le_mul_left _ $ ordinal.succ_le.2 $ nat_lt_omega _) _,
rw ← power_succ,
exact power_le_power_right omega_pos (ordinal.succ_le.2 h₃) }
end
theorem NF_below.mono {o b₁ b₂} (bb : b₁ ≤ b₂) (h : NF_below o b₁) : NF_below o b₂ :=
begin
induction h with _ e n a eb b h₁ h₂ h₃ _ IH; constructor,
exacts [h₁, h₂, lt_of_lt_of_le h₃ bb]
end
theorem NF.below_of_lt {e n a b} (H : repr e < b) : NF (oadd e n a) → NF_below (oadd e n a) b
| ⟨b', h⟩ := by cases h with _ _ _ _ eb _ h₁ h₂ h₃;
exact NF_below.oadd' h₁ h₂ H
theorem NF.below_of_lt' : ∀ {o b}, repr o < ω ^ b → NF o → NF_below o b
| 0 b H _ := NF_below.zero
| (oadd e n a) b H h := h.below_of_lt $ (power_lt_power_iff_right one_lt_omega).1 $
(lt_of_le_of_lt (omega_le_oadd _ _ _) H)
theorem NF_below_of_nat : ∀ n, NF_below (of_nat n) 1
| 0 := NF_below.zero
| (nat.succ n) := NF_below.oadd NF.zero NF_below.zero ordinal.zero_lt_one
instance NF_of_nat (n) : NF (of_nat n) := ⟨_, NF_below_of_nat n⟩
instance NF_one : NF 1 := by rw ← of_nat_one; apply_instance
theorem oadd_lt_oadd_1 {e₁ n₁ o₁ e₂ n₂ o₂} (h₁ : NF (oadd e₁ n₁ o₁)) (h : e₁ < e₂) :
oadd e₁ n₁ o₁ < oadd e₂ n₂ o₂ :=
@lt_of_lt_of_le _ _ _ _ _ ((h₁.below_of_lt h).repr_lt) (omega_le_oadd _ _ _)
theorem oadd_lt_oadd_2 {e o₁ o₂ : onote} {n₁ n₂ : ℕ+}
(h₁ : NF (oadd e n₁ o₁)) (h : (n₁:ℕ) < n₂) : oadd e n₁ o₁ < oadd e n₂ o₂ :=
begin
simp [lt_def],
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ((ordinal.add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 h₁.snd'.repr_lt)
(le_trans _ (le_add_right _ _)),
rwa [← mul_succ, mul_le_mul_iff_left (power_pos _ omega_pos),
ordinal.succ_le, nat_cast_lt]
end
theorem oadd_lt_oadd_3 {e n a₁ a₂} (h : a₁ < a₂) :
oadd e n a₁ < oadd e n a₂ :=
begin
rw lt_def, unfold repr,
exact (ordinal.add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 h
end
theorem cmp_compares : ∀ (a b : onote) [NF a] [NF b], (cmp a b).compares a b
| 0 0 h₁ h₂ := rfl
| (oadd e n a) 0 h₁ h₂ := oadd_pos _ _ _
| 0 (oadd e n a) h₁ h₂ := oadd_pos _ _ _
| o₁@(oadd e₁ n₁ a₁) o₂@(oadd e₂ n₂ a₂) h₁ h₂ := begin
rw cmp,
have IHe := @cmp_compares _ _ h₁.fst h₂.fst,
cases cmp e₁ e₂,
case ordering.lt { exact oadd_lt_oadd_1 h₁ IHe },
case ordering.gt { exact oadd_lt_oadd_1 h₂ IHe },
change e₁ = e₂ at IHe, subst IHe,
unfold _root_.cmp, cases nh : cmp_using (<) (n₁:ℕ) n₂,
case ordering.lt {
rw cmp_using_eq_lt at nh, exact oadd_lt_oadd_2 h₁ nh },
case ordering.gt {
rw cmp_using_eq_gt at nh, exact oadd_lt_oadd_2 h₂ nh },
rw cmp_using_eq_eq at nh,
have := subtype.eq (eq_of_incomp nh), subst n₂,
have IHa := @cmp_compares _ _ h₁.snd h₂.snd,
cases cmp a₁ a₂,
case ordering.lt { exact oadd_lt_oadd_3 IHa },
case ordering.gt { exact oadd_lt_oadd_3 IHa },
change a₁ = a₂ at IHa, subst IHa, exact rfl
end
theorem repr_inj {a b} [NF a] [NF b] : repr a = repr b ↔ a = b :=
⟨match cmp a b, cmp_compares a b with
| ordering.lt, (h : repr a < repr b), e := (ne_of_lt h e).elim
| ordering.gt, (h : repr a > repr b), e := (ne_of_gt h e).elim
| ordering.eq, h, e := h
end, congr_arg _⟩
theorem NF.of_dvd_omega_power {b e n a} (h : NF (oadd e n a)) (d : ω ^ b ∣ repr (oadd e n a)) :
b ≤ repr e ∧ ω ^ b ∣ repr a :=
begin
have := mt repr_inj.1 (λ h, by injection h : oadd e n a ≠ 0),
have L := le_of_not_lt (λ l, not_le_of_lt (h.below_of_lt l).repr_lt (le_of_dvd this d)),
simp at d,
exact ⟨L, (dvd_add_iff $ dvd_mul_of_dvd_left (power_dvd_power _ L) _).1 d⟩
end
theorem NF.of_dvd_omega {e n a} (h : NF (oadd e n a)) :
ω ∣ repr (oadd e n a) → repr e ≠ 0 ∧ ω ∣ repr a :=
by rw [← power_one ω, ← one_le_iff_ne_zero]; exact h.of_dvd_omega_power
/-- `top_below b o` asserts that the largest exponent in `o`, if
it exists, is less than `b`. This is an auxiliary definition
for decidability of `NF`. -/
def top_below (b) : onote → Prop
| 0 := true
| (oadd e n a) := cmp e b = ordering.lt
instance decidable_top_below : decidable_rel top_below :=
by intros b o; cases o; delta top_below; apply_instance
theorem NF_below_iff_top_below {b} [NF b] : ∀ {o},
NF_below o (repr b) ↔ NF o ∧ top_below b o
| 0 := ⟨λ h, ⟨⟨_, h⟩, trivial⟩, λ _, NF_below.zero⟩
| (oadd e n a) :=
⟨λ h, ⟨⟨_, h⟩, (@cmp_compares _ b h.fst _).eq_lt.2 h.lt⟩,
λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₁.below_of_lt $ (@cmp_compares _ b h₁.fst _).eq_lt.1 h₂⟩
instance decidable_NF : decidable_pred NF
| 0 := is_true NF.zero
| (oadd e n a) := begin
have := decidable_NF e,
have := decidable_NF a, resetI,
apply decidable_of_iff (NF e ∧ NF a ∧ top_below e a),
abstract {
rw ← and_congr_right (λ h, @NF_below_iff_top_below _ h _),
exact ⟨λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, NF.oadd h₁ n h₂, λ h, ⟨h.fst, h.snd'⟩⟩ },
end
/-- Addition of ordinal notations (correct only for normal input) -/
def add : onote → onote → onote
| 0 o := o
| (oadd e n a) o := match add a o with
| 0 := oadd e n 0
| o'@(oadd e' n' a') := match cmp e e' with
| ordering.lt := o'
| ordering.eq := oadd e (n + n') a'
| ordering.gt := oadd e n o'
end
end
instance : has_add onote := ⟨add⟩
@[simp] theorem zero_add (o : onote) : 0 + o = o := rfl
theorem oadd_add (e n a o) : oadd e n a + o = add._match_1 e n (a + o) := rfl
/-- Subtraction of ordinal notations (correct only for normal input) -/
def sub : onote → onote → onote
| 0 o := 0
| o 0 := o
| o₁@(oadd e₁ n₁ a₁) (oadd e₂ n₂ a₂) := match cmp e₁ e₂ with
| ordering.lt := 0
| ordering.gt := o₁
| ordering.eq := match (n₁:ℕ) - n₂ with
| 0 := if n₁ = n₂ then sub a₁ a₂ else 0
| (nat.succ k) := oadd e₁ k.succ_pnat a₁
end
end
instance : has_sub onote := ⟨sub⟩
theorem add_NF_below {b} : ∀ {o₁ o₂}, NF_below o₁ b → NF_below o₂ b → NF_below (o₁ + o₂) b
| 0 o h₁ h₂ := h₂
| (oadd e n a) o h₁ h₂ := begin
have h' := add_NF_below (h₁.snd.mono $ le_of_lt h₁.lt) h₂,
simp [oadd_add], cases a + o with e' n' a',
{ exact NF_below.oadd h₁.fst NF_below.zero h₁.lt },
simp [add], have := @cmp_compares _ _ h₁.fst h'.fst,
cases cmp e e'; simp [add],
{ exact h' },
{ simp at this, subst e',
exact NF_below.oadd h'.fst h'.snd h'.lt },
{ exact NF_below.oadd h₁.fst (NF.below_of_lt this ⟨_, h'⟩) h₁.lt }
end
instance add_NF (o₁ o₂) : ∀ [NF o₁] [NF o₂], NF (o₁ + o₂)
| ⟨b₁, h₁⟩ ⟨b₂, h₂⟩ := (b₁.le_total b₂).elim
(λ h, ⟨b₂, add_NF_below (h₁.mono h) h₂⟩)
(λ h, ⟨b₁, add_NF_below h₁ (h₂.mono h)⟩)
@[simp] theorem repr_add : ∀ o₁ o₂ [NF o₁] [NF o₂], repr (o₁ + o₂) = repr o₁ + repr o₂
| 0 o h₁ h₂ := by simp
| (oadd e n a) o h₁ h₂ := begin
haveI := h₁.snd, have h' := repr_add a o,
conv at h' in (_+o) {simp [(+)]},
have nf := onote.add_NF a o,
conv at nf in (_+o) {simp [(+)]},
conv in (_+o) {simp [(+), add]},
cases add a o with e' n' a'; simp [add, h'.symm, add_assoc],
have := h₁.fst, haveI := nf.fst, have ee := cmp_compares e e',
cases cmp e e'; simp [add],
{ rw [← add_assoc, @add_absorp _ (repr e') (ω ^ repr e' * (n':ℕ))],
{ have := (h₁.below_of_lt ee).repr_lt, unfold repr at this,
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (le_add_right _ _) this },
{ simpa using (mul_le_mul_iff_left $
power_pos (repr e') omega_pos).2 (nat_cast_le.2 n'.pos) } },
{ change e = e' at ee, substI e',
rw [← add_assoc, ← ordinal.mul_add, ← nat.cast_add] }
end
theorem sub_NF_below : ∀ {o₁ o₂ b}, NF_below o₁ b → NF o₂ → NF_below (o₁ - o₂) b
| 0 o b h₁ h₂ := by cases o; exact NF_below.zero
| (oadd e n a) 0 b h₁ h₂ := h₁
| (oadd e₁ n₁ a₁) (oadd e₂ n₂ a₂) b h₁ h₂ := begin
have h' := sub_NF_below h₁.snd h₂.snd,
simp [has_sub.sub, sub] at h' ⊢,
have := @cmp_compares _ _ h₁.fst h₂.fst,
cases cmp e₁ e₂; simp [sub],
{ apply NF_below.zero },
{ simp at this, subst e₂,
cases mn : (n₁:ℕ) - n₂; simp [sub],
{ by_cases en : n₁ = n₂; simp [en],
{ exact h'.mono (le_of_lt h₁.lt) },
{ exact NF_below.zero } },
{ exact NF_below.oadd h₁.fst h₁.snd h₁.lt } },
{ exact h₁ }
end
instance sub_NF (o₁ o₂) : ∀ [NF o₁] [NF o₂], NF (o₁ - o₂)
| ⟨b₁, h₁⟩ h₂ := ⟨b₁, sub_NF_below h₁ h₂⟩
@[simp] theorem repr_sub : ∀ o₁ o₂ [NF o₁] [NF o₂], repr (o₁ - o₂) = repr o₁ - repr o₂
| 0 o h₁ h₂ := by cases o; exact (ordinal.zero_sub _).symm
| (oadd e n a) 0 h₁ h₂ := (ordinal.sub_zero _).symm
| (oadd e₁ n₁ a₁) (oadd e₂ n₂ a₂) h₁ h₂ := begin
haveI := h₁.snd, haveI := h₂.snd, have h' := repr_sub a₁ a₂,
conv at h' in (a₁-a₂) {simp [has_sub.sub]},
have nf := onote.sub_NF a₁ a₂,
conv at nf in (a₁-a₂) {simp [has_sub.sub]},
conv in (_-oadd _ _ _) {simp [has_sub.sub, sub]},
have ee := @cmp_compares _ _ h₁.fst h₂.fst,
cases cmp e₁ e₂,
{ rw [sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2], {refl},
exact le_of_lt (oadd_lt_oadd_1 h₁ ee) },
{ change e₁ = e₂ at ee, substI e₂, unfold sub._match_1,
cases mn : (n₁:ℕ) - n₂; dsimp only [sub._match_2],
{ by_cases en : n₁ = n₂,
{ simp [en], rwa [add_sub_add_cancel] },
{ simp [en, -repr],
exact (sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 $ le_of_lt $ oadd_lt_oadd_2 h₁ $
lt_of_le_of_ne (nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.1 mn) (mt pnat.eq en)).symm } },
{ simp [nat.succ_pnat, -nat.cast_succ],
rw [(nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add $ le_of_lt $ nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ mn).1 mn,
add_comm, nat.cast_add, ordinal.mul_add, add_assoc, add_sub_add_cancel],
refine (ordinal.sub_eq_of_add_eq $ add_absorp h₂.snd'.repr_lt $
le_trans _ (le_add_right _ _)).symm,
simpa using mul_le_mul_left _ (nat_cast_le.2 $ nat.succ_pos _) } },
{ exact (ordinal.sub_eq_of_add_eq $ add_absorp (h₂.below_of_lt ee).repr_lt $
omega_le_oadd _ _ _).symm }
end
/-- Multiplication of ordinal notations (correct only for normal input) -/
def mul : onote → onote → onote
| 0 _ := 0
| _ 0 := 0
| o₁@(oadd e₁ n₁ a₁) (oadd e₂ n₂ a₂) :=
if e₂ = 0 then oadd e₁ (n₁ * n₂) a₁ else
oadd (e₁ + e₂) n₂ (mul o₁ a₂)
instance : has_mul onote := ⟨mul⟩
@[simp] theorem zero_mul (o : onote) : 0 * o = 0 := by cases o; refl
@[simp] theorem mul_zero (o : onote) : o * 0 = 0 := by cases o; refl
theorem oadd_mul (e₁ n₁ a₁ e₂ n₂ a₂) : oadd e₁ n₁ a₁ * oadd e₂ n₂ a₂ =
if e₂ = 0 then oadd e₁ (n₁ * n₂) a₁ else
oadd (e₁ + e₂) n₂ (oadd e₁ n₁ a₁ * a₂) := rfl
theorem oadd_mul_NF_below {e₁ n₁ a₁ b₁} (h₁ : NF_below (oadd e₁ n₁ a₁) b₁) :
∀ {o₂ b₂}, NF_below o₂ b₂ → NF_below (oadd e₁ n₁ a₁ * o₂) (repr e₁ + b₂)
| 0 b₂ h₂ := NF_below.zero
| (oadd e₂ n₂ a₂) b₂ h₂ := begin
have IH := oadd_mul_NF_below h₂.snd,
by_cases e0 : e₂ = 0; simp [e0, oadd_mul],
{ apply NF_below.oadd h₁.fst h₁.snd,
simpa using (add_lt_add_iff_left (repr e₁)).2
(lt_of_le_of_lt (ordinal.zero_le _) h₂.lt) },
{ haveI := h₁.fst, haveI := h₂.fst,
apply NF_below.oadd, apply_instance,
{ rwa repr_add },
{ rw [repr_add, ordinal.add_lt_add_iff_left], exact h₂.lt } }
end
instance mul_NF : ∀ o₁ o₂ [NF o₁] [NF o₂], NF (o₁ * o₂)
| 0 o h₁ h₂ := by cases o; exact NF.zero
| (oadd e n a) o ⟨b₁, hb₁⟩ ⟨b₂, hb₂⟩ :=
⟨_, oadd_mul_NF_below hb₁ hb₂⟩
@[simp] theorem repr_mul : ∀ o₁ o₂ [NF o₁] [NF o₂], repr (o₁ * o₂) = repr o₁ * repr o₂
| 0 o h₁ h₂ := by cases o; exact (ordinal.zero_mul _).symm
| (oadd e₁ n₁ a₁) 0 h₁ h₂ := (ordinal.mul_zero _).symm
| (oadd e₁ n₁ a₁) (oadd e₂ n₂ a₂) h₁ h₂ := begin
have IH : repr (mul _ _) = _ := @repr_mul _ _ h₁ h₂.snd,
conv {to_lhs, simp [(*)]},
have ao : repr a₁ + ω ^ repr e₁ * (n₁:ℕ) = ω ^ repr e₁ * (n₁:ℕ),
{ apply add_absorp h₁.snd'.repr_lt,
simpa using (mul_le_mul_iff_left $ power_pos _ omega_pos).2
(nat_cast_le.2 n₁.2) },
by_cases e0 : e₂ = 0; simp [e0, mul],
{ cases nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero n₂.ne_zero with x xe,
simp [h₂.zero_of_zero e0, xe, -nat.cast_succ],
rw [← nat_cast_succ x, add_mul_succ _ ao, mul_assoc] },
{ haveI := h₁.fst, haveI := h₂.fst,
simp [IH, repr_add, power_add, ordinal.mul_add],
rw ← mul_assoc, congr' 2,
have := mt repr_inj.1 e0,
rw [add_mul_limit ao (power_is_limit_left omega_is_limit this),
mul_assoc, mul_omega_dvd (nat_cast_pos.2 n₁.pos) (nat_lt_omega _)],
simpa using power_dvd_power ω (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 this) },
end
/-- Calculate division and remainder of `o` mod ω.
`split' o = (a, n)` means `o = ω * a + n`. -/
def split' : onote → onote × ℕ
| 0 := (0, 0)
| (oadd e n a) := if e = 0 then (0, n) else
let (a', m) := split' a in (oadd (e - 1) n a', m)
/-- Calculate division and remainder of `o` mod ω.
`split o = (a, n)` means `o = a + n`, where `ω ∣ a`. -/
def split : onote → onote × ℕ
| 0 := (0, 0)
| (oadd e n a) := if e = 0 then (0, n) else
let (a', m) := split a in (oadd e n a', m)
/-- `scale x o` is the ordinal notation for `ω ^ x * o`. -/
def scale (x : onote) : onote → onote
| 0 := 0
| (oadd e n a) := oadd (x + e) n (scale a)
/-- `mul_nat o n` is the ordinal notation for `o * n`. -/
def mul_nat : onote → ℕ → onote
| 0 m := 0
| _ 0 := 0
| (oadd e n a) (m+1) := oadd e (n * m.succ_pnat) a
/-- Auxiliary definition to compute the ordinal notation for the ordinal
exponentiation in `power` -/
def power_aux (e a0 a : onote) : ℕ → ℕ → onote
| _ 0 := 0
| 0 (m+1) := oadd e m.succ_pnat 0
| (k+1) m := scale (e + mul_nat a0 k) a + power_aux k m
/-- `power o₁ o₂` calculates the ordinal notation for
the ordinal exponential `o₁ ^ o₂`. -/
def power (o₁ o₂ : onote) : onote :=
match split o₁ with
| (0, 0) := if o₂ = 0 then 1 else 0
| (0, 1) := 1
| (0, m+1) := let (b', k) := split' o₂ in
oadd b' (@has_pow.pow ℕ+ _ _ m.succ_pnat k) 0
| (a@(oadd a0 _ _), m) := match split o₂ with
| (b, 0) := oadd (a0 * b) 1 0
| (b, k+1) := let eb := a0*b in
scale (eb + mul_nat a0 k) a + power_aux eb a0 (mul_nat a m) k m
end
end
instance : has_pow onote onote := ⟨power⟩
theorem power_def (o₁ o₂ : onote) : o₁ ^ o₂ = power._match_1 o₂ (split o₁) := rfl
theorem split_eq_scale_split' : ∀ {o o' m} [NF o], split' o = (o', m) → split o = (scale 1 o', m)
| 0 o' m h p := by injection p; substs o' m; refl
| (oadd e n a) o' m h p := begin
by_cases e0 : e = 0; simp [e0, split, split'] at p ⊢,
{ rcases p with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ },
{ revert p, cases h' : split' a with a' m',
haveI := h.fst, haveI := h.snd,
simp [split_eq_scale_split' h', split, split'],
have : 1 + (e - 1) = e,
{ refine repr_inj.1 _, simp,
have := mt repr_inj.1 e0,
exact add_sub_cancel_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 this) },
intros, substs o' m, simp [scale, this] }
end
theorem NF_repr_split' : ∀ {o o' m} [NF o], split' o = (o', m) → NF o' ∧ repr o = ω * repr o' + m
| 0 o' m h p := by injection p; substs o' m; simp [NF.zero]
| (oadd e n a) o' m h p := begin
by_cases e0 : e = 0; simp [e0, split, split'] at p ⊢,
{ rcases p with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩,
simp [h.zero_of_zero e0, NF.zero] },
{ revert p, cases h' : split' a with a' m',
haveI := h.fst, haveI := h.snd,
cases NF_repr_split' h' with IH₁ IH₂,
simp [IH₂, split'],
intros, substs o' m,
have : ω ^ repr e = ω ^ (1 : ordinal.{0}) * ω ^ (repr e - 1),
{ have := mt repr_inj.1 e0,
rw [← power_add, add_sub_cancel_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 this)] },
refine ⟨NF.oadd (by apply_instance) _ _, _⟩,
{ simp at this ⊢,
refine IH₁.below_of_lt' ((mul_lt_mul_iff_left omega_pos).1 $
lt_of_le_of_lt (le_add_right _ m') _),
rw [← this, ← IH₂], exact h.snd'.repr_lt },
{ rw this, simp [ordinal.mul_add, mul_assoc, add_assoc] } }
end
theorem scale_eq_mul (x) [NF x] : ∀ o [NF o], scale x o = oadd x 1 0 * o
| 0 h := rfl
| (oadd e n a) h := begin
simp [(*)], simp [mul, scale],
haveI := h.snd,
by_cases e0 : e = 0,
{ rw scale_eq_mul, simp [e0, h.zero_of_zero, show x + 0 = x, from repr_inj.1 (by simp)] },
{ simp [e0, scale_eq_mul, (*)] }
end
instance NF_scale (x) [NF x] (o) [NF o] : NF (scale x o) :=
by rw scale_eq_mul; apply_instance
@[simp] theorem repr_scale (x) [NF x] (o) [NF o] : repr (scale x o) = ω ^ repr x * repr o :=
by simp [scale_eq_mul]
theorem NF_repr_split {o o' m} [NF o] (h : split o = (o', m)) : NF o' ∧ repr o = repr o' + m :=
begin
cases e : split' o with a n,
cases NF_repr_split' e with s₁ s₂, resetI,
rw split_eq_scale_split' e at h,
injection h, substs o' n,
simp [repr_scale, s₂.symm],
apply_instance
end
theorem split_dvd {o o' m} [NF o] (h : split o = (o', m)) : ω ∣ repr o' :=
begin
cases e : split' o with a n,
rw split_eq_scale_split' e at h,
injection h, subst o',
cases NF_repr_split' e, resetI, simp
end
theorem split_add_lt {o e n a m} [NF o] (h : split o = (oadd e n a, m)) : repr a + m < ω ^ repr e :=
begin
cases NF_repr_split h with h₁ h₂,
cases h₁.of_dvd_omega (split_dvd h) with e0 d,
have := h₁.fst, have := h₁.snd,
refine add_lt_omega_power h₁.snd'.repr_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le (nat_lt_omega _) _),
simpa using power_le_power_right omega_pos (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 e0),
end
@[simp] theorem mul_nat_eq_mul (n o) : mul_nat o n = o * of_nat n :=
by cases o; cases n; refl
instance NF_mul_nat (o) [NF o] (n) : NF (mul_nat o n) :=
by simp; apply_instance
instance NF_power_aux (e a0 a) [NF e] [NF a0] [NF a] : ∀ k m, NF (power_aux e a0 a k m)
| k 0 := by cases k; exact NF.zero
| 0 (m+1) := NF.oadd_zero _ _
| (k+1) (m+1) := by haveI := NF_power_aux k;
simp [power_aux, nat.succ_ne_zero]; apply_instance
instance NF_power (o₁ o₂) [NF o₁] [NF o₂] : NF (o₁ ^ o₂) :=
begin
cases e₁ : split o₁ with a m,
have na := (NF_repr_split e₁).1,
cases e₂ : split' o₂ with b' k,
haveI := (NF_repr_split' e₂).1,
casesI a with a0 n a',
{ cases m with m,
{ by_cases o₂ = 0; simp [pow, power, *]; apply_instance },
{ by_cases m = 0; simp [pow, power, -monoid.pow_eq_has_pow, *]; apply_instance } },
{ simp [pow, power, e₁, e₂, split_eq_scale_split' e₂],
have := na.fst,
cases k with k; simp [succ_eq_add_one, power]; resetI; apply_instance }
end
theorem scale_power_aux (e a0 a : onote) [NF e] [NF a0] [NF a] :
∀ k m, repr (power_aux e a0 a k m) = ω ^ repr e * repr (power_aux 0 a0 a k m)
| 0 m := by cases m; simp [power_aux]
| (k+1) m := by by_cases m = 0; simp [h, power_aux,
ordinal.mul_add, power_add, mul_assoc, scale_power_aux]
theorem repr_power_aux₁ {e a} [Ne : NF e] [Na : NF a] {a' : ordinal}
(e0 : repr e ≠ 0) (h : a' < ω ^ repr e) (aa : repr a = a') (n : ℕ+) :
(ω ^ repr e * (n:ℕ) + a') ^ ω = (ω ^ repr e) ^ ω :=
begin
subst aa,
have No := Ne.oadd n (Na.below_of_lt' h),
have := omega_le_oadd e n a, unfold repr at this,
refine le_antisymm _ (power_le_power_left _ this),
apply (power_le_of_limit
(ne_of_gt $ lt_of_lt_of_le (power_pos _ omega_pos) this) omega_is_limit).2,
intros b l,
have := (No.below_of_lt (lt_succ_self _)).repr_lt, unfold repr at this,
apply le_trans (power_le_power_left b $ le_of_lt this),
rw [← power_mul, ← power_mul],
apply power_le_power_right omega_pos,
cases le_or_lt ω (repr e) with h h,
{ apply le_trans (mul_le_mul_left _ $ le_of_lt $ lt_succ_self _),
rw [succ, add_mul_succ _ (one_add_of_omega_le h), ← succ,
succ_le, mul_lt_mul_iff_left (ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 e0)],
exact omega_is_limit.2 _ l },
{ refine le_trans (le_of_lt $ mul_lt_omega (omega_is_limit.2 _ h) l) _,
simpa using mul_le_mul_right ω (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 e0) }
end
section
local infixr ^ := @pow ordinal.{0} ordinal ordinal.has_pow
theorem repr_power_aux₂ {a0 a'} [N0 : NF a0] [Na' : NF a'] (m : ℕ)
(d : ω ∣ repr a')
(e0 : repr a0 ≠ 0) (h : repr a' + m < ω ^ repr a0) (n : ℕ+) (k : ℕ) :
let R := repr (power_aux 0 a0 (oadd a0 n a' * of_nat m) k m) in
(k ≠ 0 → R < (ω ^ repr a0) ^ succ k) ∧
(ω ^ repr a0) ^ k * (ω ^ repr a0 * (n:ℕ) + repr a') + R =
(ω ^ repr a0 * (n:ℕ) + repr a' + m) ^ succ k :=
begin
intro,
haveI No : NF (oadd a0 n a') :=
N0.oadd n (Na'.below_of_lt' $ lt_of_le_of_lt (le_add_right _ _) h),
induction k with k IH, {cases m; simp [power_aux, R]},
rename R R', let R := repr (power_aux 0 a0 (oadd a0 n a' * of_nat m) k m),
let ω0 := ω ^ repr a0, let α' := ω0 * n + repr a',
change (k ≠ 0 → R < ω0 ^ succ k) ∧ ω0 ^ k * α' + R = (α' + m) ^ succ k at IH,
have RR : R' = ω0 ^ k * (α' * m) + R,
{ by_cases m = 0; simp [h, R', power_aux, R, power_mul],
{ cases k; simp [power_aux] }, { refl } },
have α0 : 0 < α', {simpa [α', lt_def, repr] using oadd_pos a0 n a'},
have ω00 : 0 < ω0 ^ k := power_pos _ (power_pos _ omega_pos),
have Rl : R < ω ^ (repr a0 * succ ↑k),
{ by_cases k0 : k = 0,
{ simp [k0],
refine lt_of_lt_of_le _ (power_le_power_right omega_pos (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 e0)),
cases m with m; simp [k0, R, power_aux, omega_pos],
rw [← nat.cast_succ], apply nat_lt_omega },
{ rw power_mul, exact IH.1 k0 } },
refine ⟨λ_, _, _⟩,
{ rw [RR, ← power_mul _ _ (succ k.succ)],
have e0 := ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 e0,
have rr0 := lt_of_lt_of_le e0 (le_add_left _ _),
apply add_lt_omega_power,
{ simp [power_mul, ω0, power_add, mul_assoc],
rw [mul_lt_mul_iff_left ω00, ← ordinal.power_add],
have := (No.below_of_lt _).repr_lt, unfold repr at this,
refine mul_lt_omega_power rr0 this (nat_lt_omega _),
simpa using (add_lt_add_iff_left (repr a0)).2 e0 },
{ refine lt_of_lt_of_le Rl (power_le_power_right omega_pos $
mul_le_mul_left _ $ succ_le_succ.2 $ nat_cast_le.2 $ le_of_lt k.lt_succ_self) } },
refine calc
ω0 ^ k.succ * α' + R'
= ω0 ^ succ k * α' + (ω0 ^ k * α' * m + R) : by rw [nat_cast_succ, RR, ← mul_assoc]
... = (ω0 ^ k * α' + R) * α' + (ω0 ^ k * α' + R) * m : _
... = (α' + m) ^ succ k.succ : by rw [← ordinal.mul_add, ← nat_cast_succ, power_succ, IH.2],
congr' 1,
{ have αd : ω ∣ α' := dvd_add (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left
(by simpa using power_dvd_power ω (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 e0)) _) d,
rw [ordinal.mul_add (ω0 ^ k), add_assoc, ← mul_assoc, ← power_succ,
add_mul_limit _ (is_limit_iff_omega_dvd.2 ⟨ne_of_gt α0, αd⟩), mul_assoc,
@mul_omega_dvd n (nat_cast_pos.2 n.pos) (nat_lt_omega _) _ αd],
apply @add_absorp _ (repr a0 * succ k),
{ refine add_lt_omega_power _ Rl,
rw [power_mul, power_succ, mul_lt_mul_iff_left ω00],
exact No.snd'.repr_lt },
{ have := mul_le_mul_left (ω0 ^ succ k) (one_le_iff_pos.2 $ nat_cast_pos.2 n.pos),
rw power_mul, simpa [-power_succ] } },
{ cases m,
{ have : R = 0, {cases k; simp [R, power_aux]}, simp [this] },
{ rw [← nat_cast_succ, add_mul_succ],
apply add_absorp Rl,
rw [power_mul, power_succ],
apply ordinal.mul_le_mul_left,
simpa [α', repr] using omega_le_oadd a0 n a' } }
end
end
theorem repr_power (o₁ o₂) [NF o₁] [NF o₂] : repr (o₁ ^ o₂) = repr o₁ ^ repr o₂ :=
begin
cases e₁ : split o₁ with a m,
cases NF_repr_split e₁ with N₁ r₁,
cases a with a0 n a',
{ cases m with m,
{ by_cases o₂ = 0; simp [power_def, power, e₁, h, r₁],
have := mt repr_inj.1 h, rw zero_power this },
{ cases e₂ : split' o₂ with b' k,
cases NF_repr_split' e₂ with _ r₂,
by_cases m = 0; simp [power_def, power, e₁, h, r₁, e₂, r₂, -nat.cast_succ],
rw [power_add, power_mul, power_omega _ (nat_lt_omega _)],
simpa using nat_cast_lt.2 (nat.succ_lt_succ $ pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h) } },
{ haveI := N₁.fst, haveI := N₁.snd,
cases N₁.of_dvd_omega (split_dvd e₁) with a00 ad,
have al := split_add_lt e₁,
have aa : repr (a' + of_nat m) = repr a' + m, {simp},
cases e₂ : split' o₂ with b' k,
cases NF_repr_split' e₂ with _ r₂,
simp [power_def, power, e₁, r₁, split_eq_scale_split' e₂],
cases k with k; resetI,
{ simp [power, r₂, power_mul, repr_power_aux₁ a00 al aa, add_assoc] },
{ simp [succ_eq_add_one, power, r₂, power_add, power_mul, mul_assoc, add_assoc],
rw [repr_power_aux₁ a00 al aa, scale_power_aux], simp [power_mul],
rw [← ordinal.mul_add, ← add_assoc (ω ^ repr a0 * (n:ℕ))], congr' 1,
rw [← power_succ],
exact (repr_power_aux₂ _ ad a00 al _ _).2 } }
end
end onote
/-- The type of normal ordinal notations. (It would have been
nicer to define this right in the inductive type, but `NF o`
requires `repr` which requires `onote`, so all these things
would have to be defined at once, which messes up the VM
representation.) -/
def nonote := {o : onote // o.NF}
instance : decidable_eq nonote := by unfold nonote; apply_instance
namespace nonote
open onote
instance NF (o : nonote) : NF o.1 := o.2
/-- Construct a `nonote` from an ordinal notation
(and infer normality) -/
def mk (o : onote) [h : NF o] : nonote := ⟨o, h⟩
/-- The ordinal represented by an ordinal notation.
(This function is noncomputable because ordinal
arithmetic is noncomputable. In computational applications
`nonote` can be used exclusively without reference
to `ordinal`, but this function allows for correctness
results to be stated.) -/
noncomputable def repr (o : nonote) : ordinal := o.1.repr
instance : has_to_string nonote := ⟨λ x, x.1.to_string⟩
instance : has_repr nonote := ⟨λ x, x.1.repr'⟩
instance : preorder nonote :=
{ le := λ x y, repr x ≤ repr y,
lt := λ x y, repr x < repr y,
le_refl := λ a, @le_refl ordinal _ _,
le_trans := λ a b c, @le_trans ordinal _ _ _ _,
lt_iff_le_not_le := λ a b, @lt_iff_le_not_le ordinal _ _ _ }
instance : has_zero nonote := ⟨⟨0, NF.zero⟩⟩
instance : inhabited nonote := ⟨0⟩
/-- Convert a natural number to an ordinal notation -/
def of_nat (n : ℕ) : nonote := ⟨of_nat n, _, NF_below_of_nat _⟩
/-- Compare ordinal notations -/
def cmp (a b : nonote) : ordering :=
cmp a.1 b.1
theorem cmp_compares : ∀ a b : nonote, (cmp a b).compares a b
| ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩ := begin
resetI,
dsimp [cmp], have := onote.cmp_compares a b,
cases onote.cmp a b; try {exact this},
exact subtype.mk_eq_mk.2 this
end
instance : linear_order nonote := linear_order_of_compares cmp cmp_compares
/-- Asserts that `repr a < ω ^ repr b`. Used in `nonote.rec_on` -/
def below (a b : nonote) : Prop := NF_below a.1 (repr b)
/-- The `oadd` pseudo-constructor for `nonote` -/
def oadd (e : nonote) (n : ℕ+) (a : nonote) (h : below a e) : nonote := ⟨_, NF.oadd e.2 n h⟩
/-- This is a recursor-like theorem for `nonote` suggesting an
inductive definition, which can't actually be defined this
way due to conflicting dependencies. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] def rec_on {C : nonote → Sort*} (o : nonote)
(H0 : C 0)
(H1 : ∀ e n a h, C e → C a → C (oadd e n a h)) : C o :=
begin
cases o with o h, induction o with e n a IHe IHa,
{ exact H0 },
{ exact H1 ⟨e, h.fst⟩ n ⟨a, h.snd⟩ h.snd' (IHe _) (IHa _) }
end
/-- Addition of ordinal notations -/
instance : has_add nonote := ⟨λ x y, mk (x.1 + y.1)⟩
theorem repr_add (a b) : repr (a + b) = repr a + repr b :=
onote.repr_add a.1 b.1
/-- Subtraction of ordinal notations -/
instance : has_sub nonote := ⟨λ x y, mk (x.1 - y.1)⟩
theorem repr_sub (a b) : repr (a - b) = repr a - repr b :=
onote.repr_sub a.1 b.1
/-- Multiplication of ordinal notations -/
instance : has_mul nonote := ⟨λ x y, mk (x.1 * y.1)⟩
theorem repr_mul (a b) : repr (a * b) = repr a * repr b :=
onote.repr_mul a.1 b.1
/-- Exponentiation of ordinal notations -/
def power (x y : nonote) := mk (x.1.power y.1)
theorem repr_power (a b) : repr (power a b) = (repr a).power (repr b) :=
onote.repr_power a.1 b.1
end nonote
|
e4bfc1d9ab18a1d80c62f2522ccea681151e2142 | 63abd62053d479eae5abf4951554e1064a4c45b4 | /src/category_theory/limits/connected.lean | 1b2c248568291d34ff33ad874055414c298d8d24 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Lix0120/mathlib | 0020745240315ed0e517cbf32e738d8f9811dd80 | e14c37827456fc6707f31b4d1d16f1f3a3205e91 | refs/heads/master | 1,673,102,855,024 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 308,930,245 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,604,164,710,000 | 1,604,163,547,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,728 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta
-/
import category_theory.limits.shapes.pullbacks
import category_theory.limits.shapes.equalizers
import category_theory.limits.preserves.basic
import category_theory.is_connected
/-!
# Connected limits
A connected limit is a limit whose shape is a connected category.
We give examples of connected categories, and prove that the functor given
by `(X × -)` preserves any connected limit. That is, any limit of shape `J`
where `J` is a connected category is preserved by the functor `(X × -)`.
-/
noncomputable theory
universes v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
open category_theory category_theory.category category_theory.limits
namespace category_theory
section examples
instance wide_pullback_shape_connected (J : Type v₁) : is_connected (wide_pullback_shape J) :=
begin
apply is_connected.of_induct,
introv hp t,
cases j,
{ exact hp },
{ rwa t (wide_pullback_shape.hom.term j) }
end
instance wide_pushout_shape_connected (J : Type v₁) : is_connected (wide_pushout_shape J) :=
begin
apply is_connected.of_induct,
introv hp t,
cases j,
{ exact hp },
{ rwa ← t (wide_pushout_shape.hom.init j) }
end
instance parallel_pair_inhabited : inhabited walking_parallel_pair := ⟨walking_parallel_pair.one⟩
instance parallel_pair_connected : is_connected (walking_parallel_pair) :=
begin
apply is_connected.of_induct,
introv _ t,
cases j,
{ rwa t walking_parallel_pair_hom.left },
{ assumption }
end
end examples
local attribute [tidy] tactic.case_bash
variables {C : Type u₂} [category.{v₂} C]
variables [has_binary_products C]
variables {J : Type v₂} [small_category J]
namespace prod_preserves_connected_limits
/-- (Impl). The obvious natural transformation from (X × K -) to K. -/
@[simps]
def γ₂ {K : J ⥤ C} (X : C) : K ⋙ prod.functor.obj X ⟶ K :=
{ app := λ Y, limits.prod.snd }
/-- (Impl). The obvious natural transformation from (X × K -) to X -/
@[simps]
def γ₁ {K : J ⥤ C} (X : C) : K ⋙ prod.functor.obj X ⟶ (functor.const J).obj X :=
{ app := λ Y, limits.prod.fst }
/-- (Impl). Given a cone for (X × K -), produce a cone for K using the natural transformation `γ₂` -/
@[simps]
def forget_cone {X : C} {K : J ⥤ C} (s : cone (K ⋙ prod.functor.obj X)) : cone K :=
{ X := s.X,
π := s.π ≫ γ₂ X }
end prod_preserves_connected_limits
open prod_preserves_connected_limits
/--
The functor `(X × -)` preserves any connected limit.
Note that this functor does not preserve the two most obvious disconnected limits - that is,
`(X × -)` does not preserve products or terminal object, eg `(X ⨯ A) ⨯ (X ⨯ B)` is not isomorphic to
`X ⨯ (A ⨯ B)` and `X ⨯ 1` is not isomorphic to `1`.
-/
noncomputable
def prod_preserves_connected_limits [is_connected J] (X : C) :
preserves_limits_of_shape J (prod.functor.obj X) :=
{ preserves_limit := λ K,
{ preserves := λ c l,
{ lift := λ s, prod.lift (s.π.app (classical.arbitrary _) ≫ limits.prod.fst) (l.lift (forget_cone s)),
fac' := λ s j,
begin
apply prod.hom_ext,
{ erw [assoc, limit.map_π, comp_id, limit.lift_π],
exact (nat_trans_from_is_connected (s.π ≫ γ₁ X) j (classical.arbitrary _)).symm },
{ simp [← l.fac (forget_cone s) j] }
end,
uniq' := λ s m L,
begin
apply prod.hom_ext,
{ erw [limit.lift_π, ← L (classical.arbitrary J), assoc, limit.map_π, comp_id],
refl },
{ rw limit.lift_π,
apply l.uniq (forget_cone s),
intro j,
simp [← L j] }
end } } }
end category_theory
|
5c6bffd828923eb1fba224abe4f04805e4199f06 | a9d0fb7b0e4f802bd3857b803e6c5c23d87fef91 | /tests/lean/alias2.lean | 896025fb36c8710b682e8456d3850255cba05b85 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean-osx | 4a954262c780e404c1369d6c06516161d07fcb40 | 3670278342d2f4faa49d95b46d86642d7875b47c | refs/heads/master | 1,611,410,334,552 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 12,043,103 | 5 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 173 | lean | --
namespace foo
definition t := true
end foo
open foo
namespace bla
definition t := false
check foo.t -- <<< must print foo.t : Prop instead of t : Prop
end bla
|
a7ff3382ca0c36952b89f30c1498821e10ab6a49 | cf39355caa609c0f33405126beee2739aa3cb77e | /tests/lean/584a.lean | ae895fe26956c7c6c67e81c61289e7fd1d4370b3 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/lean | 12b87f69d92e614daea8bcc9d4de9a9ace089d0e | cce7990ea86a78bdb383e38ed7f9b5ba93c60ce0 | refs/heads/master | 1,687,508,156,644 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 169,960,991 | 457 | 107 | Apache-2.0 | 1,686,744,372,000 | 1,549,790,268,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 332 | lean | universe variables u
variables (A : Type u) [H : inhabited A] (x : A)
include H
definition foo := x
#check foo -- A and x are explicit
variables {A x}
definition foo' := x
#check @foo' -- A is explicit, x is implicit
open nat
#check foo nat 10
definition test : foo' = (10:nat) := rfl
set_option pp.implicit true
#print test
|
9e98114a72941f97ab893c53546fbd6a2def786d | 5ae26df177f810c5006841e9c73dc56e01b978d7 | /src/meta/expr.lean | f36e33d6b491bd561eae5e0df596860db9c554c6 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ChrisHughes24/mathlib | 98322577c460bc6b1fe5c21f42ce33ad1c3e5558 | a2a867e827c2a6702beb9efc2b9282bd801d5f9a | refs/heads/master | 1,583,848,251,477 | 1,565,164,247,000 | 1,565,164,247,000 | 129,409,993 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,565,164,817,000 | 1,523,628,059,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,099 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Simon Hudon, Scott Morrison, Keeley Hoek, Robert Y. Lewis
Additional non-tactic operations on expr and related types
-/
namespace name
meta def deinternalize_field : name → name
| (name.mk_string s name.anonymous) :=
let i := s.mk_iterator in
if i.curr = '_' then i.next.next_to_string else s
| n := n
meta def get_nth_prefix : name → ℕ → name
| nm 0 := nm
| nm (n + 1) := get_nth_prefix nm.get_prefix n
private meta def pop_nth_prefix_aux : name → ℕ → name × ℕ
| anonymous n := (anonymous, 1)
| nm n := let (pfx, height) := pop_nth_prefix_aux nm.get_prefix n in
if height ≤ n then (anonymous, height + 1)
else (nm.update_prefix pfx, height + 1)
-- Pops the top `n` prefixes from the given name.
meta def pop_nth_prefix (nm : name) (n : ℕ) : name :=
prod.fst $ pop_nth_prefix_aux nm n
meta def pop_prefix (n : name) : name :=
pop_nth_prefix n 1
private def from_components_aux : name → list string → name
| n [] := n
| n (s :: rest) := from_components_aux (name.mk_string s n) rest
def from_components : list string → name :=
from_components_aux name.anonymous
-- `name`s can contain numeral pieces, which are not legal names
-- when typed/passed directly to the parser. We turn an arbitrary
-- name into a legal identifier name.
meta def sanitize_name : name → name
| name.anonymous := name.anonymous
| (name.mk_string s p) := name.mk_string s $ sanitize_name p
| (name.mk_numeral s p) := name.mk_string sformat!"n{s}" $ sanitize_name p
def append_suffix : name → string → name
| (mk_string s n) s' := mk_string (s ++ s') n
| n _ := n
end name
namespace level
meta def nonzero : level → bool
| (succ _) := tt
| (max l₁ l₂) := l₁.nonzero || l₂.nonzero
| (imax _ l₂) := l₂.nonzero
| _ := ff
end level
namespace expr
open tactic
protected meta def to_pos_nat : expr → option ℕ
| `(has_one.one _) := some 1
| `(bit0 %%e) := bit0 <$> e.to_pos_nat
| `(bit1 %%e) := bit1 <$> e.to_pos_nat
| _ := none
protected meta def to_nat : expr → option ℕ
| `(has_zero.zero _) := some 0
| e := e.to_pos_nat
protected meta def to_int : expr → option ℤ
| `(has_neg.neg %%e) := do n ← e.to_nat, some (-n)
| e := coe <$> e.to_nat
meta def is_meta_var : expr → bool
| (mvar _ _ _) := tt
| e := ff
meta def is_sort : expr → bool
| (sort _) := tt
| e := ff
meta def list_local_consts (e : expr) : list expr :=
e.fold [] (λ e' _ es, if e'.is_local_constant then insert e' es else es)
meta def list_constant (e : expr) : name_set :=
e.fold mk_name_set (λ e' _ es, if e'.is_constant then es.insert e'.const_name else es)
meta def list_meta_vars (e : expr) : list expr :=
e.fold [] (λ e' _ es, if e'.is_meta_var then insert e' es else es)
meta def list_names_with_prefix (pre : name) (e : expr) : name_set :=
e.fold mk_name_set $ λ e' _ l,
match e' with
| expr.const n _ := if n.get_prefix = pre then l.insert n else l
| _ := l
end
meta def is_mvar : expr → bool
| (mvar _ _ _) := tt
| _ := ff
/--
is_num_eq n1 n2 returns true if n1 and n2 are both numerals with the same numeral structure,
ignoring differences in type and type class arguments.
-/
meta def is_num_eq : expr → expr → bool
| `(@has_zero.zero _ _) `(@has_zero.zero _ _) := tt
| `(@has_one.one _ _) `(@has_one.one _ _) := tt
| `(bit0 %%a) `(bit0 %%b) := a.is_num_eq b
| `(bit1 %%a) `(bit1 %%b) := a.is_num_eq b
| `(-%%a) `(-%%b) := a.is_num_eq b
| `(%%a/%%a') `(%%b/%%b') := a.is_num_eq b
| _ _ := ff
meta def simp (t : expr)
(cfg : simp_config := {}) (discharger : tactic unit := failed)
(no_defaults := ff) (attr_names : list name := []) (hs : list simp_arg_type := []) :
tactic (expr × expr) :=
do (s, to_unfold) ← mk_simp_set no_defaults attr_names hs,
simplify s to_unfold t cfg `eq discharger
meta def dsimp (t : expr)
(cfg : dsimp_config := {})
(no_defaults := ff) (attr_names : list name := []) (hs : list simp_arg_type := []) :
tactic expr :=
do (s, to_unfold) ← mk_simp_set no_defaults attr_names hs,
s.dsimplify to_unfold t cfg
end expr
namespace environment
meta def in_current_file' (env : environment) (n : name) : bool :=
env.in_current_file n && (n ∉ [``quot, ``quot.mk, ``quot.lift, ``quot.ind])
meta def is_structure_like (env : environment) (n : name) : option (nat × name) :=
do guardb (env.is_inductive n),
d ← (env.get n).to_option,
[intro] ← pure (env.constructors_of n) | none,
guard (env.inductive_num_indices n = 0),
some (env.inductive_num_params n, intro)
meta def is_structure (env : environment) (n : name) : bool :=
option.is_some $ do
(nparams, intro) ← env.is_structure_like n,
di ← (env.get intro).to_option,
expr.pi x _ _ _ ← nparams.iterate
(λ e : option expr, do expr.pi _ _ _ body ← e | none, some body)
(some di.type) | none,
env.is_projection (n ++ x.deinternalize_field)
end environment
|
98096d2b9a97f25d5b0119117bb160e4a575175b | 4d2583807a5ac6caaffd3d7a5f646d61ca85d532 | /src/algebra/lie/submodule.lean | 1e0712ff9e520e8aebe5bd84a92f84e65b9b40cb | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AntoineChambert-Loir/mathlib | 64aabb896129885f12296a799818061bc90da1ff | 07be904260ab6e36a5769680b6012f03a4727134 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,187,631,771 | 1,636,719,886,000 | 1,636,719,886,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 33,604 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import algebra.lie.subalgebra
import ring_theory.noetherian
/-!
# Lie submodules of a Lie algebra
In this file we define Lie submodules and Lie ideals, we construct the lattice structure on Lie
submodules and we use it to define various important operations, notably the Lie span of a subset
of a Lie module.
## Main definitions
* `lie_submodule`
* `lie_submodule.well_founded_of_noetherian`
* `lie_submodule.lie_span`
* `lie_submodule.map`
* `lie_submodule.comap`
* `lie_ideal`
* `lie_ideal.map`
* `lie_ideal.comap`
## Tags
lie algebra, lie submodule, lie ideal, lattice structure
-/
universes u v w w₁ w₂
section lie_submodule
variables (R : Type u) (L : Type v) (M : Type w)
variables [comm_ring R] [lie_ring L] [lie_algebra R L] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
variables [lie_ring_module L M] [lie_module R L M]
set_option old_structure_cmd true
/-- A Lie submodule of a Lie module is a submodule that is closed under the Lie bracket.
This is a sufficient condition for the subset itself to form a Lie module. -/
structure lie_submodule extends submodule R M :=
(lie_mem : ∀ {x : L} {m : M}, m ∈ carrier → ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ carrier)
attribute [nolint doc_blame] lie_submodule.to_submodule
namespace lie_submodule
variables {R L M} (N N' : lie_submodule R L M)
/-- The zero module is a Lie submodule of any Lie module. -/
instance : has_zero (lie_submodule R L M) :=
⟨{ lie_mem := λ x m h, by { rw ((submodule.mem_bot R).1 h), apply lie_zero, },
..(0 : submodule R M)}⟩
instance : inhabited (lie_submodule R L M) := ⟨0⟩
instance coe_submodule : has_coe (lie_submodule R L M) (submodule R M) := ⟨to_submodule⟩
@[norm_cast]
lemma coe_to_submodule : ((N : submodule R M) : set M) = N := rfl
instance has_mem : has_mem M (lie_submodule R L M) := ⟨λ x N, x ∈ (N : set M)⟩
@[simp] lemma mem_carrier {x : M} : x ∈ N.carrier ↔ x ∈ (N : set M) :=
iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_mk_iff (S : set M) (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄) {x : M} :
x ∈ (⟨S, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩ : lie_submodule R L M) ↔ x ∈ S :=
iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_coe_submodule {x : M} : x ∈ (N : submodule R M) ↔ x ∈ N := iff.rfl
lemma mem_coe {x : M} : x ∈ (N : set M) ↔ x ∈ N := iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma zero_mem : (0 : M) ∈ N := (N : submodule R M).zero_mem
@[simp] lemma coe_to_set_mk (S : set M) (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄) :
((⟨S, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩ : lie_submodule R L M) : set M) = S := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_to_submodule_mk (p : submodule R M) (h) :
(({lie_mem := h, ..p} : lie_submodule R L M) : submodule R M) = p :=
by { cases p, refl, }
lemma coe_submodule_injective :
function.injective (to_submodule : lie_submodule R L M → submodule R M) :=
λ x y h, by { cases x, cases y, congr, injection h }
@[ext] lemma ext (h : ∀ m, m ∈ N ↔ m ∈ N') : N = N' :=
coe_submodule_injective $ set_like.ext h
@[simp] lemma coe_to_submodule_eq_iff : (N : submodule R M) = (N' : submodule R M) ↔ N = N' :=
coe_submodule_injective.eq_iff
/-- Copy of a lie_submodule with a new `carrier` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
protected def copy (s : set M) (hs : s = ↑N) : lie_submodule R L M :=
{ carrier := s,
zero_mem' := hs.symm ▸ N.zero_mem',
add_mem' := hs.symm ▸ N.add_mem',
smul_mem' := hs.symm ▸ N.smul_mem',
lie_mem := hs.symm ▸ N.lie_mem, }
@[simp] lemma coe_copy (S : lie_submodule R L M) (s : set M) (hs : s = ↑S) :
(S.copy s hs : set M) = s := rfl
lemma copy_eq (S : lie_submodule R L M) (s : set M) (hs : s = ↑S) : S.copy s hs = S :=
coe_submodule_injective (set_like.coe_injective hs)
instance : lie_ring_module L N :=
{ bracket := λ (x : L) (m : N), ⟨⁅x, m.val⁆, N.lie_mem m.property⟩,
add_lie := by { intros x y m, apply set_coe.ext, apply add_lie, },
lie_add := by { intros x m n, apply set_coe.ext, apply lie_add, },
leibniz_lie := by { intros x y m, apply set_coe.ext, apply leibniz_lie, }, }
instance : lie_module R L N :=
{ lie_smul := by { intros t x y, apply set_coe.ext, apply lie_smul, },
smul_lie := by { intros t x y, apply set_coe.ext, apply smul_lie, }, }
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ((0 : N) : M) = (0 : M) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_add (m m' : N) : (↑(m + m') : M) = (m : M) + (m' : M) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_neg (m : N) : (↑(-m) : M) = -(m : M) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_sub (m m' : N) : (↑(m - m') : M) = (m : M) - (m' : M) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_smul (t : R) (m : N) : (↑(t • m) : M) = t • (m : M) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_bracket (x : L) (m : N) : (↑⁅x, m⁆ : M) = ⁅x, ↑m⁆ := rfl
end lie_submodule
section lie_ideal
variables (L)
/-- An ideal of a Lie algebra is a Lie submodule of the Lie algebra as a Lie module over itself. -/
abbreviation lie_ideal := lie_submodule R L L
lemma lie_mem_right (I : lie_ideal R L) (x y : L) (h : y ∈ I) : ⁅x, y⁆ ∈ I := I.lie_mem h
lemma lie_mem_left (I : lie_ideal R L) (x y : L) (h : x ∈ I) : ⁅x, y⁆ ∈ I :=
by { rw [←lie_skew, ←neg_lie], apply lie_mem_right, assumption, }
/-- An ideal of a Lie algebra is a Lie subalgebra. -/
def lie_ideal_subalgebra (I : lie_ideal R L) : lie_subalgebra R L :=
{ lie_mem' := by { intros x y hx hy, apply lie_mem_right, exact hy, },
..I.to_submodule, }
instance : has_coe (lie_ideal R L) (lie_subalgebra R L) := ⟨λ I, lie_ideal_subalgebra R L I⟩
@[norm_cast] lemma lie_ideal.coe_to_subalgebra (I : lie_ideal R L) :
((I : lie_subalgebra R L) : set L) = I := rfl
@[norm_cast] lemma lie_ideal.coe_to_lie_subalgebra_to_submodule (I : lie_ideal R L) :
((I : lie_subalgebra R L) : submodule R L) = I := rfl
end lie_ideal
variables {R M}
lemma submodule.exists_lie_submodule_coe_eq_iff (p : submodule R M) :
(∃ (N : lie_submodule R L M), ↑N = p) ↔ ∀ (x : L) (m : M), m ∈ p → ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ p :=
begin
split,
{ rintros ⟨N, rfl⟩, exact N.lie_mem, },
{ intros h, use { lie_mem := h, ..p }, exact lie_submodule.coe_to_submodule_mk p _, },
end
namespace lie_subalgebra
variables {L}
/-- Given a Lie subalgebra `K ⊆ L`, if we view `L` as a `K`-module by restriction, it contains
a distinguished Lie submodule for the action of `K`, namely `K` itself. -/
def to_lie_submodule (K : lie_subalgebra R L) : lie_submodule R K L :=
{ lie_mem := λ x y hy, K.lie_mem x.property hy,
.. (K : submodule R L) }
@[simp] lemma coe_to_lie_submodule (K : lie_subalgebra R L) :
(K.to_lie_submodule : submodule R L) = K :=
by { rcases K with ⟨⟨⟩⟩, refl, }
@[simp] lemma mem_to_lie_submodule {K : lie_subalgebra R L} (x : L) :
x ∈ K.to_lie_submodule ↔ x ∈ K :=
iff.rfl
lemma exists_lie_ideal_coe_eq_iff (K : lie_subalgebra R L) :
(∃ (I : lie_ideal R L), ↑I = K) ↔ ∀ (x y : L), y ∈ K → ⁅x, y⁆ ∈ K :=
begin
simp only [← coe_to_submodule_eq_iff, lie_ideal.coe_to_lie_subalgebra_to_submodule,
submodule.exists_lie_submodule_coe_eq_iff L],
exact iff.rfl,
end
lemma exists_nested_lie_ideal_coe_eq_iff {K K' : lie_subalgebra R L} (h : K ≤ K') :
(∃ (I : lie_ideal R K'), ↑I = of_le h) ↔ ∀ (x y : L), x ∈ K' → y ∈ K → ⁅x, y⁆ ∈ K :=
begin
simp only [exists_lie_ideal_coe_eq_iff, coe_bracket, mem_of_le],
split,
{ intros h' x y hx hy, exact h' ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, h hy⟩ hy, },
{ rintros h' ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ hy', exact h' x y hx hy', },
end
end lie_subalgebra
end lie_submodule
namespace lie_submodule
variables {R : Type u} {L : Type v} {M : Type w}
variables [comm_ring R] [lie_ring L] [lie_algebra R L] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
variables [lie_ring_module L M] [lie_module R L M]
variables (N N' : lie_submodule R L M) (I J : lie_ideal R L)
section lattice_structure
open set
lemma coe_injective : function.injective (coe : lie_submodule R L M → set M) :=
set_like.coe_injective.comp coe_submodule_injective
instance : partial_order (lie_submodule R L M) :=
{ le := λ N N', ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ N → x ∈ N', -- Overriding `le` like this gives a better defeq.
..partial_order.lift (coe : lie_submodule R L M → set M) coe_injective }
lemma le_def : N ≤ N' ↔ (N : set M) ⊆ N' := iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_submodule_le_coe_submodule : (N : submodule R M) ≤ N' ↔ N ≤ N' :=
iff.rfl
instance : has_bot (lie_submodule R L M) := ⟨0⟩
@[simp] lemma bot_coe : ((⊥ : lie_submodule R L M) : set M) = {0} := rfl
@[simp] lemma bot_coe_submodule : ((⊥ : lie_submodule R L M) : submodule R M) = ⊥ := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_bot (x : M) : x ∈ (⊥ : lie_submodule R L M) ↔ x = 0 := mem_singleton_iff
instance : has_top (lie_submodule R L M) :=
⟨{ lie_mem := λ x m h, mem_univ ⁅x, m⁆,
..(⊤ : submodule R M) }⟩
@[simp] lemma top_coe : ((⊤ : lie_submodule R L M) : set M) = univ := rfl
@[simp] lemma top_coe_submodule : ((⊤ : lie_submodule R L M) : submodule R M) = ⊤ := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_top (x : M) : x ∈ (⊤ : lie_submodule R L M) := mem_univ x
instance : has_inf (lie_submodule R L M) :=
⟨λ N N', { lie_mem := λ x m h, mem_inter (N.lie_mem h.1) (N'.lie_mem h.2),
..(N ⊓ N' : submodule R M) }⟩
instance : has_Inf (lie_submodule R L M) :=
⟨λ S, { lie_mem := λ x m h, by
{ simp only [submodule.mem_carrier, mem_Inter, submodule.Inf_coe, mem_set_of_eq,
forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂, exists_imp_distrib] at *,
intros N hN, apply N.lie_mem (h N hN), },
..Inf {(s : submodule R M) | s ∈ S} }⟩
@[simp] theorem inf_coe : (↑(N ⊓ N') : set M) = N ∩ N' := rfl
@[simp] lemma Inf_coe_to_submodule (S : set (lie_submodule R L M)) :
(↑(Inf S) : submodule R M) = Inf {(s : submodule R M) | s ∈ S} := rfl
@[simp] lemma Inf_coe (S : set (lie_submodule R L M)) : (↑(Inf S) : set M) = ⋂ s ∈ S, (s : set M) :=
begin
rw [← lie_submodule.coe_to_submodule, Inf_coe_to_submodule, submodule.Inf_coe],
ext m,
simpa only [mem_Inter, mem_set_of_eq, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂, exists_imp_distrib],
end
lemma Inf_glb (S : set (lie_submodule R L M)) : is_glb S (Inf S) :=
begin
have h : ∀ (N N' : lie_submodule R L M), (N : set M) ≤ N' ↔ N ≤ N', { intros, refl },
apply is_glb.of_image h,
simp only [Inf_coe],
exact is_glb_binfi
end
/-- The set of Lie submodules of a Lie module form a complete lattice.
We provide explicit values for the fields `bot`, `top`, `inf` to get more convenient definitions
than we would otherwise obtain from `complete_lattice_of_Inf`. -/
instance : complete_lattice (lie_submodule R L M) :=
{ bot := ⊥,
bot_le := λ N _ h, by { rw mem_bot at h, rw h, exact N.zero_mem', },
top := ⊤,
le_top := λ _ _ _, trivial,
inf := (⊓),
le_inf := λ N₁ N₂ N₃ h₁₂ h₁₃ m hm, ⟨h₁₂ hm, h₁₃ hm⟩,
inf_le_left := λ _ _ _, and.left,
inf_le_right := λ _ _ _, and.right,
..complete_lattice_of_Inf _ Inf_glb }
instance : add_comm_monoid (lie_submodule R L M) :=
{ add := (⊔),
add_assoc := λ _ _ _, sup_assoc,
zero := ⊥,
zero_add := λ _, bot_sup_eq,
add_zero := λ _, sup_bot_eq,
add_comm := λ _ _, sup_comm, }
@[simp] lemma add_eq_sup : N + N' = N ⊔ N' := rfl
@[norm_cast, simp] lemma sup_coe_to_submodule :
(↑(N ⊔ N') : submodule R M) = (N : submodule R M) ⊔ (N' : submodule R M) :=
begin
have aux : ∀ (x : L) m, m ∈ (N ⊔ N' : submodule R M) → ⁅x,m⁆ ∈ (N ⊔ N' : submodule R M),
{ simp only [submodule.mem_sup],
rintro x m ⟨y, hy, z, hz, rfl⟩,
refine ⟨⁅x, y⁆, N.lie_mem hy, ⁅x, z⁆, N'.lie_mem hz, (lie_add _ _ _).symm⟩ },
refine le_antisymm (Inf_le ⟨{ lie_mem := aux, ..(N ⊔ N' : submodule R M) }, _⟩) _,
{ simp only [exists_prop, and_true, mem_set_of_eq, eq_self_iff_true, coe_to_submodule_mk,
← coe_submodule_le_coe_submodule, and_self, le_sup_left, le_sup_right] },
{ simp, },
end
@[norm_cast, simp] lemma inf_coe_to_submodule :
(↑(N ⊓ N') : submodule R M) = (N : submodule R M) ⊓ (N' : submodule R M) := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_inf (x : M) : x ∈ N ⊓ N' ↔ x ∈ N ∧ x ∈ N' :=
by rw [← mem_coe_submodule, ← mem_coe_submodule, ← mem_coe_submodule, inf_coe_to_submodule,
submodule.mem_inf]
lemma mem_sup (x : M) : x ∈ N ⊔ N' ↔ ∃ (y ∈ N) (z ∈ N'), y + z = x :=
by { rw [← mem_coe_submodule, sup_coe_to_submodule, submodule.mem_sup], exact iff.rfl, }
lemma eq_bot_iff : N = ⊥ ↔ ∀ (m : M), m ∈ N → m = 0 :=
by { rw eq_bot_iff, exact iff.rfl, }
-- TODO[gh-6025]: make this an instance once safe to do so
lemma subsingleton_of_bot : subsingleton (lie_submodule R L ↥(⊥ : lie_submodule R L M)) :=
begin
apply subsingleton_of_bot_eq_top,
ext ⟨x, hx⟩, change x ∈ ⊥ at hx, rw submodule.mem_bot at hx, subst hx,
simp only [true_iff, eq_self_iff_true, submodule.mk_eq_zero, lie_submodule.mem_bot],
end
instance : is_modular_lattice (lie_submodule R L M) :=
{ sup_inf_le_assoc_of_le := λ N₁ N₂ N₃,
by { simp only [← coe_submodule_le_coe_submodule, sup_coe_to_submodule, inf_coe_to_submodule],
exact is_modular_lattice.sup_inf_le_assoc_of_le ↑N₂, }, }
variables (R L M)
lemma well_founded_of_noetherian [is_noetherian R M] :
well_founded ((>) : lie_submodule R L M → lie_submodule R L M → Prop) :=
begin
let f : ((>) : lie_submodule R L M → lie_submodule R L M → Prop) →r
((>) : submodule R M → submodule R M → Prop) :=
{ to_fun := coe,
map_rel' := λ N N' h, h, },
apply f.well_founded, rw ← is_noetherian_iff_well_founded, apply_instance,
end
@[simp] lemma subsingleton_iff : subsingleton (lie_submodule R L M) ↔ subsingleton M :=
have h : subsingleton (lie_submodule R L M) ↔ subsingleton (submodule R M),
{ rw [← subsingleton_iff_bot_eq_top, ← subsingleton_iff_bot_eq_top, ← coe_to_submodule_eq_iff,
top_coe_submodule, bot_coe_submodule], },
h.trans $ submodule.subsingleton_iff R
@[simp] lemma nontrivial_iff : nontrivial (lie_submodule R L M) ↔ nontrivial M :=
not_iff_not.mp (
(not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton.trans $ subsingleton_iff R L M).trans
not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton.symm)
instance [nontrivial M] : nontrivial (lie_submodule R L M) := (nontrivial_iff R L M).mpr ‹_›
variables {R L M}
section inclusion_maps
/-- The inclusion of a Lie submodule into its ambient space is a morphism of Lie modules. -/
def incl : N →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M :=
{ map_lie' := λ x m, rfl,
..submodule.subtype (N : submodule R M) }
@[simp] lemma incl_apply (m : N) : N.incl m = m := rfl
lemma incl_eq_val : (N.incl : N → M) = subtype.val := rfl
variables {N N'} (h : N ≤ N')
/-- Given two nested Lie submodules `N ⊆ N'`, the inclusion `N ↪ N'` is a morphism of Lie modules.-/
def hom_of_le : N →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N' :=
{ map_lie' := λ x m, rfl,
..submodule.of_le h }
@[simp] lemma coe_hom_of_le (m : N) : (hom_of_le h m : M) = m := rfl
lemma hom_of_le_apply (m : N) : hom_of_le h m = ⟨m.1, h m.2⟩ := rfl
lemma hom_of_le_injective : function.injective (hom_of_le h) :=
λ x y, by simp only [hom_of_le_apply, imp_self, subtype.mk_eq_mk, set_like.coe_eq_coe,
subtype.val_eq_coe]
end inclusion_maps
section lie_span
variables (R L) (s : set M)
/-- The `lie_span` of a set `s ⊆ M` is the smallest Lie submodule of `M` that contains `s`. -/
def lie_span : lie_submodule R L M := Inf {N | s ⊆ N}
variables {R L s}
lemma mem_lie_span {x : M} : x ∈ lie_span R L s ↔ ∀ N : lie_submodule R L M, s ⊆ N → x ∈ N :=
by { change x ∈ (lie_span R L s : set M) ↔ _, erw Inf_coe, exact mem_bInter_iff, }
lemma subset_lie_span : s ⊆ lie_span R L s :=
by { intros m hm, erw mem_lie_span, intros N hN, exact hN hm, }
lemma submodule_span_le_lie_span : submodule.span R s ≤ lie_span R L s :=
by { rw submodule.span_le, apply subset_lie_span, }
lemma lie_span_le {N} : lie_span R L s ≤ N ↔ s ⊆ N :=
begin
split,
{ exact subset.trans subset_lie_span, },
{ intros hs m hm, rw mem_lie_span at hm, exact hm _ hs, },
end
lemma lie_span_mono {t : set M} (h : s ⊆ t) : lie_span R L s ≤ lie_span R L t :=
by { rw lie_span_le, exact subset.trans h subset_lie_span, }
lemma lie_span_eq : lie_span R L (N : set M) = N :=
le_antisymm (lie_span_le.mpr rfl.subset) subset_lie_span
lemma coe_lie_span_submodule_eq_iff {p : submodule R M} :
(lie_span R L (p : set M) : submodule R M) = p ↔ ∃ (N : lie_submodule R L M), ↑N = p :=
begin
rw p.exists_lie_submodule_coe_eq_iff L, split; intros h,
{ intros x m hm, rw [← h, mem_coe_submodule], exact lie_mem _ (subset_lie_span hm), },
{ rw [← coe_to_submodule_mk p h, coe_to_submodule, coe_to_submodule_eq_iff, lie_span_eq], },
end
variables (R L M)
/-- `lie_span` forms a Galois insertion with the coercion from `lie_submodule` to `set`. -/
protected def gi : galois_insertion (lie_span R L : set M → lie_submodule R L M) coe :=
{ choice := λ s _, lie_span R L s,
gc := λ s t, lie_span_le,
le_l_u := λ s, subset_lie_span,
choice_eq := λ s h, rfl }
@[simp] lemma span_empty : lie_span R L (∅ : set M) = ⊥ :=
(lie_submodule.gi R L M).gc.l_bot
@[simp] lemma span_univ : lie_span R L (set.univ : set M) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 $ set_like.le_def.2 $ subset_lie_span
variables {M}
lemma span_union (s t : set M) : lie_span R L (s ∪ t) = lie_span R L s ⊔ lie_span R L t :=
(lie_submodule.gi R L M).gc.l_sup
lemma span_Union {ι} (s : ι → set M) : lie_span R L (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, lie_span R L (s i) :=
(lie_submodule.gi R L M).gc.l_supr
end lie_span
end lattice_structure
end lie_submodule
section lie_submodule_map_and_comap
variables {R : Type u} {L : Type v} {L' : Type w₂} {M : Type w} {M' : Type w₁}
variables [comm_ring R] [lie_ring L] [lie_algebra R L] [lie_ring L'] [lie_algebra R L']
variables [add_comm_group M] [module R M] [lie_ring_module L M] [lie_module R L M]
variables [add_comm_group M'] [module R M'] [lie_ring_module L M'] [lie_module R L M']
namespace lie_submodule
variables (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M') (N N₂ : lie_submodule R L M) (N' : lie_submodule R L M')
/-- A morphism of Lie modules `f : M → M'` pushes forward Lie submodules of `M` to Lie submodules
of `M'`. -/
def map : lie_submodule R L M' :=
{ lie_mem := λ x m' h, by
{ rcases h with ⟨m, hm, hfm⟩, use ⁅x, m⁆, split,
{ apply N.lie_mem hm, },
{ norm_cast at hfm, simp [hfm], }, },
..(N : submodule R M).map (f : M →ₗ[R] M') }
/-- A morphism of Lie modules `f : M → M'` pulls back Lie submodules of `M'` to Lie submodules of
`M`. -/
def comap : lie_submodule R L M :=
{ lie_mem := λ x m h, by { suffices : ⁅x, f m⁆ ∈ N', { simp [this], }, apply N'.lie_mem h, },
..(N' : submodule R M').comap (f : M →ₗ[R] M') }
variables {f N N₂ N'}
lemma map_le_iff_le_comap : map f N ≤ N' ↔ N ≤ comap f N' :=
set.image_subset_iff
variables (f)
lemma gc_map_comap : galois_connection (map f) (comap f) :=
λ N N', map_le_iff_le_comap
variables {f}
@[simp] lemma map_sup : (N ⊔ N₂).map f = N.map f ⊔ N₂.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_sup
lemma mem_map (m' : M') : m' ∈ N.map f ↔ ∃ m, m ∈ N ∧ f m = m' :=
submodule.mem_map
@[simp] lemma mem_comap {m : M} : m ∈ comap f N' ↔ f m ∈ N' := iff.rfl
end lie_submodule
namespace lie_ideal
variables (f : L →ₗ⁅R⁆ L') (I I₂ : lie_ideal R L) (J : lie_ideal R L')
@[simp] lemma top_coe_lie_subalgebra : ((⊤ : lie_ideal R L) : lie_subalgebra R L) = ⊤ := rfl
/-- A morphism of Lie algebras `f : L → L'` pushes forward Lie ideals of `L` to Lie ideals of `L'`.
Note that unlike `lie_submodule.map`, we must take the `lie_span` of the image. Mathematically
this is because although `f` makes `L'` into a Lie module over `L`, in general the `L` submodules of
`L'` are not the same as the ideals of `L'`. -/
def map : lie_ideal R L' := lie_submodule.lie_span R L' $ (I : submodule R L).map (f : L →ₗ[R] L')
/-- A morphism of Lie algebras `f : L → L'` pulls back Lie ideals of `L'` to Lie ideals of `L`.
Note that `f` makes `L'` into a Lie module over `L` (turning `f` into a morphism of Lie modules)
and so this is a special case of `lie_submodule.comap` but we do not exploit this fact. -/
def comap : lie_ideal R L :=
{ lie_mem := λ x y h, by { suffices : ⁅f x, f y⁆ ∈ J, { simp [this], }, apply J.lie_mem h, },
..(J : submodule R L').comap (f : L →ₗ[R] L') }
@[simp] lemma map_coe_submodule (h : ↑(map f I) = f '' I) :
(map f I : submodule R L') = (I : submodule R L).map (f : L →ₗ[R] L') :=
by { rw [set_like.ext'_iff, lie_submodule.coe_to_submodule, h, submodule.map_coe], refl, }
@[simp] lemma comap_coe_submodule :
(comap f J : submodule R L) = (J : submodule R L').comap (f : L →ₗ[R] L') := rfl
lemma map_le : map f I ≤ J ↔ f '' I ⊆ J := lie_submodule.lie_span_le
variables {f I I₂ J}
lemma mem_map {x : L} (hx : x ∈ I) : f x ∈ map f I :=
by { apply lie_submodule.subset_lie_span, use x, exact ⟨hx, rfl⟩, }
@[simp] lemma mem_comap {x : L} : x ∈ comap f J ↔ f x ∈ J := iff.rfl
lemma map_le_iff_le_comap : map f I ≤ J ↔ I ≤ comap f J :=
by { rw map_le, exact set.image_subset_iff, }
variables (f)
lemma gc_map_comap : galois_connection (map f) (comap f) :=
λ I I', map_le_iff_le_comap
variables {f}
@[simp] lemma map_sup : (I ⊔ I₂).map f = I.map f ⊔ I₂.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_sup
lemma map_comap_le : map f (comap f J) ≤ J :=
by { rw map_le_iff_le_comap, apply le_refl _, }
/-- See also `lie_ideal.map_comap_eq`. -/
lemma comap_map_le : I ≤ comap f (map f I) :=
by { rw ← map_le_iff_le_comap, apply le_refl _, }
@[mono] lemma map_mono : monotone (map f) :=
λ I₁ I₂ h,
by { rw lie_submodule.le_def at h, apply lie_submodule.lie_span_mono (set.image_subset ⇑f h), }
@[mono] lemma comap_mono : monotone (comap f) :=
λ J₁ J₂ h, by { rw lie_submodule.le_def at h ⊢, exact set.preimage_mono h, }
lemma map_of_image (h : f '' I = J) : I.map f = J :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ erw [lie_submodule.lie_span_le, submodule.map_coe, h], },
{ rw [lie_submodule.le_def, ← h], exact lie_submodule.subset_lie_span, },
end
/-- Note that this is not a special case of `lie_submodule.subsingleton_of_bot`. Indeed, given
`I : lie_ideal R L`, in general the two lattices `lie_ideal R I` and `lie_submodule R L I` are
different (though the latter does naturally inject into the former).
In other words, in general, ideals of `I`, regarded as a Lie algebra in its own right, are not the
same as ideals of `L` contained in `I`. -/
-- TODO[gh-6025]: make this an instance once safe to do so
lemma subsingleton_of_bot : subsingleton (lie_ideal R ↥(⊥ : lie_ideal R L)) :=
begin
apply subsingleton_of_bot_eq_top,
ext ⟨x, hx⟩, change x ∈ ⊥ at hx, rw submodule.mem_bot at hx, subst hx,
simp only [true_iff, eq_self_iff_true, submodule.mk_eq_zero, lie_submodule.mem_bot],
end
end lie_ideal
namespace lie_hom
variables (f : L →ₗ⁅R⁆ L') (I : lie_ideal R L) (J : lie_ideal R L')
/-- The kernel of a morphism of Lie algebras, as an ideal in the domain. -/
def ker : lie_ideal R L := lie_ideal.comap f ⊥
/-- The range of a morphism of Lie algebras as an ideal in the codomain. -/
def ideal_range : lie_ideal R L' := lie_submodule.lie_span R L' f.range
lemma ideal_range_eq_lie_span_range :
f.ideal_range = lie_submodule.lie_span R L' f.range := rfl
lemma ideal_range_eq_map :
f.ideal_range = lie_ideal.map f ⊤ :=
by { ext, simp only [ideal_range, range_eq_map], refl }
/-- The condition that the image of a morphism of Lie algebras is an ideal. -/
def is_ideal_morphism : Prop := (f.ideal_range : lie_subalgebra R L') = f.range
@[simp] lemma is_ideal_morphism_def :
f.is_ideal_morphism ↔ (f.ideal_range : lie_subalgebra R L') = f.range := iff.rfl
lemma is_ideal_morphism_iff :
f.is_ideal_morphism ↔ ∀ (x : L') (y : L), ∃ (z : L), ⁅x, f y⁆ = f z :=
begin
simp only [is_ideal_morphism_def, ideal_range_eq_lie_span_range,
← lie_subalgebra.coe_to_submodule_eq_iff, ← f.range.coe_to_submodule,
lie_ideal.coe_to_lie_subalgebra_to_submodule, lie_submodule.coe_lie_span_submodule_eq_iff,
lie_subalgebra.mem_coe_submodule, mem_range, exists_imp_distrib,
submodule.exists_lie_submodule_coe_eq_iff],
split,
{ intros h x y, obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ := h x (f y) y rfl, use z, exact hz.symm, },
{ intros h x y z hz, obtain ⟨w, hw⟩ := h x z, use w, rw [← hw, hz], },
end
lemma range_subset_ideal_range : (f.range : set L') ⊆ f.ideal_range := lie_submodule.subset_lie_span
lemma map_le_ideal_range : I.map f ≤ f.ideal_range :=
begin
rw f.ideal_range_eq_map,
exact lie_ideal.map_mono le_top,
end
lemma ker_le_comap : f.ker ≤ J.comap f := lie_ideal.comap_mono bot_le
@[simp] lemma ker_coe_submodule : (ker f : submodule R L) = (f : L →ₗ[R] L').ker := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_ker {x : L} : x ∈ ker f ↔ f x = 0 :=
show x ∈ (f.ker : submodule R L) ↔ _,
by simp only [ker_coe_submodule, linear_map.mem_ker, coe_to_linear_map]
lemma mem_ideal_range {x : L} : f x ∈ ideal_range f :=
begin
rw ideal_range_eq_map,
exact lie_ideal.mem_map (lie_submodule.mem_top x)
end
@[simp] lemma mem_ideal_range_iff (h : is_ideal_morphism f) {y : L'} :
y ∈ ideal_range f ↔ ∃ (x : L), f x = y :=
begin
rw f.is_ideal_morphism_def at h,
rw [← lie_submodule.mem_coe, ← lie_ideal.coe_to_subalgebra, h, f.range_coe, set.mem_range],
end
lemma le_ker_iff : I ≤ f.ker ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ I → f x = 0 :=
begin
split; intros h x hx,
{ specialize h hx, rw mem_ker at h, exact h, },
{ rw mem_ker, apply h x hx, },
end
lemma ker_eq_bot : f.ker = ⊥ ↔ function.injective f :=
by rw [← lie_submodule.coe_to_submodule_eq_iff, ker_coe_submodule, lie_submodule.bot_coe_submodule,
linear_map.ker_eq_bot, coe_to_linear_map]
@[simp] lemma range_coe_submodule : (f.range : submodule R L') = (f : L →ₗ[R] L').range := rfl
lemma range_eq_top : f.range = ⊤ ↔ function.surjective f :=
begin
rw [← lie_subalgebra.coe_to_submodule_eq_iff, range_coe_submodule,
lie_subalgebra.top_coe_submodule],
exact linear_map.range_eq_top,
end
@[simp] lemma ideal_range_eq_top_of_surjective (h : function.surjective f) : f.ideal_range = ⊤ :=
begin
rw ← f.range_eq_top at h,
rw [ideal_range_eq_lie_span_range, h, ← lie_subalgebra.coe_to_submodule,
← lie_submodule.coe_to_submodule_eq_iff, lie_submodule.top_coe_submodule,
lie_subalgebra.top_coe_submodule, lie_submodule.coe_lie_span_submodule_eq_iff],
use ⊤,
exact lie_submodule.top_coe_submodule,
end
lemma is_ideal_morphism_of_surjective (h : function.surjective f) : f.is_ideal_morphism :=
by rw [is_ideal_morphism_def, f.ideal_range_eq_top_of_surjective h, f.range_eq_top.mpr h,
lie_ideal.top_coe_lie_subalgebra]
end lie_hom
namespace lie_ideal
variables {f : L →ₗ⁅R⁆ L'} {I : lie_ideal R L} {J : lie_ideal R L'}
@[simp] lemma map_eq_bot_iff : I.map f = ⊥ ↔ I ≤ f.ker :=
by { rw ← le_bot_iff, exact lie_ideal.map_le_iff_le_comap }
lemma coe_map_of_surjective (h : function.surjective f) :
(I.map f : submodule R L') = (I : submodule R L).map (f : L →ₗ[R] L') :=
begin
let J : lie_ideal R L' :=
{ lie_mem := λ x y hy,
begin
have hy' : ∃ (x : L), x ∈ I ∧ f x = y, { simpa [hy], },
obtain ⟨z₂, hz₂, rfl⟩ := hy',
obtain ⟨z₁, rfl⟩ := h x,
simp only [lie_hom.coe_to_linear_map, set_like.mem_coe, set.mem_image,
lie_submodule.mem_coe_submodule, submodule.mem_carrier, submodule.map_coe],
use ⁅z₁, z₂⁆,
exact ⟨I.lie_mem hz₂, f.map_lie z₁ z₂⟩,
end,
..(I : submodule R L).map (f : L →ₗ[R] L'), },
erw lie_submodule.coe_lie_span_submodule_eq_iff,
use J,
apply lie_submodule.coe_to_submodule_mk,
end
lemma mem_map_of_surjective {y : L'} (h₁ : function.surjective f) (h₂ : y ∈ I.map f) :
∃ (x : I), f x = y :=
begin
rw [← lie_submodule.mem_coe_submodule, coe_map_of_surjective h₁, submodule.mem_map] at h₂,
obtain ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ := h₂,
use ⟨x, hx⟩,
refl,
end
lemma bot_of_map_eq_bot {I : lie_ideal R L} (h₁ : function.injective f) (h₂ : I.map f = ⊥) :
I = ⊥ :=
begin
rw ← f.ker_eq_bot at h₁, change comap f ⊥ = ⊥ at h₁,
rw [eq_bot_iff, map_le_iff_le_comap, h₁] at h₂,
rw eq_bot_iff, exact h₂,
end
/-- Given two nested Lie ideals `I₁ ⊆ I₂`, the inclusion `I₁ ↪ I₂` is a morphism of Lie algebras. -/
def hom_of_le {I₁ I₂ : lie_ideal R L} (h : I₁ ≤ I₂) : I₁ →ₗ⁅R⁆ I₂ :=
{ map_lie' := λ x y, rfl,
..submodule.of_le h, }
@[simp] lemma coe_hom_of_le {I₁ I₂ : lie_ideal R L} (h : I₁ ≤ I₂) (x : I₁) :
(hom_of_le h x : L) = x := rfl
lemma hom_of_le_apply {I₁ I₂ : lie_ideal R L} (h : I₁ ≤ I₂) (x : I₁) :
hom_of_le h x = ⟨x.1, h x.2⟩ := rfl
lemma hom_of_le_injective {I₁ I₂ : lie_ideal R L} (h : I₁ ≤ I₂) :
function.injective (hom_of_le h) :=
λ x y, by simp only [hom_of_le_apply, imp_self, subtype.mk_eq_mk, set_like.coe_eq_coe,
subtype.val_eq_coe]
@[simp] lemma map_sup_ker_eq_map : lie_ideal.map f (I ⊔ f.ker) = lie_ideal.map f I :=
begin
suffices : lie_ideal.map f (I ⊔ f.ker) ≤ lie_ideal.map f I,
{ exact le_antisymm this (lie_ideal.map_mono le_sup_left), },
apply lie_submodule.lie_span_mono,
rintros x ⟨y, hy₁, hy₂⟩, rw ← hy₂,
erw lie_submodule.mem_sup at hy₁, obtain ⟨z₁, hz₁, z₂, hz₂, hy⟩ := hy₁, rw ← hy,
rw [f.coe_to_linear_map, f.map_add, f.mem_ker.mp hz₂, add_zero], exact ⟨z₁, hz₁, rfl⟩,
end
@[simp] lemma map_comap_eq (h : f.is_ideal_morphism) : map f (comap f J) = f.ideal_range ⊓ J :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ rw le_inf_iff, exact ⟨f.map_le_ideal_range _, map_comap_le⟩, },
{ rw f.is_ideal_morphism_def at h,
rw [lie_submodule.le_def, lie_submodule.inf_coe, ← coe_to_subalgebra, h],
rintros y ⟨⟨x, h₁⟩, h₂⟩, rw ← h₁ at h₂ ⊢, exact mem_map h₂, },
end
@[simp] lemma comap_map_eq (h : ↑(map f I) = f '' I) : comap f (map f I) = I ⊔ f.ker :=
by rw [← lie_submodule.coe_to_submodule_eq_iff, comap_coe_submodule, I.map_coe_submodule f h,
lie_submodule.sup_coe_to_submodule, f.ker_coe_submodule, submodule.comap_map_eq]
variables (f I J)
/-- Regarding an ideal `I` as a subalgebra, the inclusion map into its ambient space is a morphism
of Lie algebras. -/
def incl : I →ₗ⁅R⁆ L := (I : lie_subalgebra R L).incl
@[simp] lemma incl_range : I.incl.range = I := (I : lie_subalgebra R L).incl_range
@[simp] lemma incl_apply (x : I) : I.incl x = x := rfl
@[simp] lemma incl_coe : (I.incl : I →ₗ[R] L) = (I : submodule R L).subtype := rfl
@[simp] lemma comap_incl_self : comap I.incl I = ⊤ :=
by { rw ← lie_submodule.coe_to_submodule_eq_iff, exact submodule.comap_subtype_self _, }
@[simp] lemma ker_incl : I.incl.ker = ⊥ :=
by rw [← lie_submodule.coe_to_submodule_eq_iff, I.incl.ker_coe_submodule,
lie_submodule.bot_coe_submodule, incl_coe, submodule.ker_subtype]
@[simp] lemma incl_ideal_range : I.incl.ideal_range = I :=
begin
rw [lie_hom.ideal_range_eq_lie_span_range, ← lie_subalgebra.coe_to_submodule,
← lie_submodule.coe_to_submodule_eq_iff, incl_range, coe_to_lie_subalgebra_to_submodule,
lie_submodule.coe_lie_span_submodule_eq_iff],
use I,
end
lemma incl_is_ideal_morphism : I.incl.is_ideal_morphism :=
begin
rw [I.incl.is_ideal_morphism_def, incl_ideal_range],
exact (I : lie_subalgebra R L).incl_range.symm,
end
end lie_ideal
end lie_submodule_map_and_comap
namespace lie_module_hom
variables {R : Type u} {L : Type v} {M : Type w} {N : Type w₁}
variables [comm_ring R] [lie_ring L] [lie_algebra R L]
variables [add_comm_group M] [module R M] [lie_ring_module L M] [lie_module R L M]
variables [add_comm_group N] [module R N] [lie_ring_module L N] [lie_module R L N]
variables (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N)
/-- The range of a morphism of Lie modules `f : M → N` is a Lie submodule of `N`.
See Note [range copy pattern]. -/
def range : lie_submodule R L N :=
(lie_submodule.map f ⊤).copy (set.range f) set.image_univ.symm
@[simp] lemma coe_range : (f.range : set N) = set.range f := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_submodule_range : (f.range : submodule R N) = (f : M →ₗ[R] N).range := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_range (n : N) : n ∈ f.range ↔ ∃ m, f m = n :=
iff.rfl
lemma map_top : lie_submodule.map f ⊤ = f.range :=
by { ext, simp [lie_submodule.mem_map], }
end lie_module_hom
section top_equiv_self
variables {R : Type u} {L : Type v}
variables [comm_ring R] [lie_ring L] [lie_algebra R L]
/-- The natural equivalence between the 'top' Lie subalgebra and the enclosing Lie algebra. -/
def lie_subalgebra.top_equiv_self : (⊤ : lie_subalgebra R L) ≃ₗ⁅R⁆ L :=
{ inv_fun := λ x, ⟨x, set.mem_univ x⟩,
left_inv := λ x, by { ext, refl, },
right_inv := λ x, rfl,
..(⊤ : lie_subalgebra R L).incl, }
@[simp] lemma lie_subalgebra.top_equiv_self_apply (x : (⊤ : lie_subalgebra R L)) :
lie_subalgebra.top_equiv_self x = x := rfl
/-- The natural equivalence between the 'top' Lie ideal and the enclosing Lie algebra. -/
def lie_ideal.top_equiv_self : (⊤ : lie_ideal R L) ≃ₗ⁅R⁆ L :=
lie_subalgebra.top_equiv_self
@[simp] lemma lie_ideal.top_equiv_self_apply (x : (⊤ : lie_ideal R L)) :
lie_ideal.top_equiv_self x = x := rfl
end top_equiv_self
|
53c88f57d94752931077e3dae46b759d79d4b5ba | e83ddc62e2c86805ddf581443a41b664d72a40d5 | /proofs/pigeonhole.lean | c8939f3f40f712dbc4871e74b60d5878459e24f6 | [] | no_license | mdickinson/snippets | fcc3accedfd54389ea7c43af2309170128925e9b | 9df4b78b1468aa5eaa7fe1ecc1c2e028e06b37de | refs/heads/master | 1,661,582,598,170 | 1,643,576,064,000 | 1,643,576,064,000 | 150,001,812 | 3 | 3 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,626 | lean | /-
Attempt to prove some form of the pigeonhole principle in Lean.
We prove two different versions; the first says that for any map
f : fin n → ℕ
with n ≥ 1, there's an element x of fin n such that f x ≥ m / n.
The second says that for any map f : fin m → fin n, again with n ≥ 1,
there's an element y of fin n such that the preimage of y has at
least m/n elements.
-/
/-
Definitions of partial summation (up to a given m) and summation on fin n.
-/
def partial_sum {n : ℕ} (m : ℕ) (m_le_n : m ≤ n) (f : fin n → ℕ) : ℕ := begin
induction m with k ind_hyp,
exact 0,
exact ind_hyp (nat.le_of_succ_le m_le_n) + f ⟨k, m_le_n⟩,
end
def sum_of {n : ℕ} (f : fin n → ℕ) : ℕ := partial_sum n (nat.le_refl n) f
/-
Lemmas to help with unwinding the recursive partial_sum definition.
-/
lemma partial_sum_zero {n : ℕ} (f : fin n → ℕ) :
partial_sum 0 (nat.zero_le n) f = 0 := rfl
lemma partial_sum_succ {n : ℕ} (m : ℕ) (succ_m_le_n : nat.succ m ≤ n) (f) :
partial_sum (nat.succ m) succ_m_le_n f =
partial_sum m (nat.le_of_succ_le succ_m_le_n) f +
f ⟨ m, succ_m_le_n ⟩ := by rw partial_sum; refl
/-
Basic properties of partial_sum.
-/
lemma partial_sum_eq {n m : ℕ} (m_le_n : m ≤ n)
(f : fin n → ℕ) (g : fin n → ℕ) :
(∀ x, f x = g x) → partial_sum m m_le_n f = partial_sum m m_le_n g :=
begin
intro f_eq_g,
induction m with k ind_hyp,
refl, -- base case
repeat {rw partial_sum_succ},
rw ind_hyp (nat.le_of_succ_le m_le_n),
rw f_eq_g
end
lemma partial_sum_of_zero {n m : ℕ} (m_le_n : m ≤ n) :
partial_sum m m_le_n (λ x, 0) = 0 :=
begin
induction m with k ind_hyp,
refl, -- base case
repeat {rw partial_sum_succ},
rw ind_hyp (nat.le_of_succ_le m_le_n)
end
lemma partial_sum_of_add
{n : ℕ} (m : ℕ) (m_le_n : m ≤ n) (f : fin n → ℕ) (g : fin n → ℕ) :
partial_sum m m_le_n (λ x, f x + g x) =
partial_sum m m_le_n f + partial_sum m m_le_n g :=
begin
induction m with k ind_hyp,
refl, -- base case
repeat {rw partial_sum_succ},
rw ind_hyp (nat.le_of_succ_le m_le_n),
simp,
end
lemma partial_sum_of_one {n m : ℕ} (m_le_n : m ≤ n) :
partial_sum m m_le_n (λ x, 1) = m :=
begin
induction m with k ind_hyp,
refl, -- base case
repeat {rw partial_sum_succ},
rw ind_hyp (nat.le_of_succ_le m_le_n)
end
lemma partial_sum_of_indicator {n : ℕ} (m : ℕ) (m_le_n : m ≤ n) (x : fin n) :
partial_sum m m_le_n (λ y, if x = y then 1 else 0) =
if x.val < m then 1 else 0 :=
begin
induction m with k ind_hyp,
refl, -- base case
repeat {rw partial_sum_succ},
rw ind_hyp (nat.le_of_succ_le m_le_n),
have take_vals : ite (x = (⟨k, m_le_n⟩ : fin n)) 1 0 = ite (x.val = k) 1 0,
{
cases nat.decidable_eq x.val k with x_ne_k x_eq_k,
rw [if_neg, if_neg],
exact x_ne_k,
apply fin.ne_of_vne,
exact x_ne_k,
rw [if_pos, if_pos],
exact x_eq_k,
apply fin.eq_of_veq,
exact x_eq_k,
},
rw take_vals,
cases lt_trichotomy x.val k with hlt heq_hgt,
{ -- x < k
rw [if_pos, if_neg, if_pos],
exact nat.lt_succ_of_lt hlt,
exact ne_of_lt hlt,
exact hlt
},
cases heq_hgt with heq hgt,
{ -- x = k
rw [if_neg, if_pos, if_pos]; rw heq,
apply nat.lt_succ_self,
apply nat.lt_irrefl
},
{ -- x > k
rw [if_neg, if_neg, if_neg],
intro lt_succ,
have x_le_k : x.val ≤ k, {
apply nat.le_of_lt_succ lt_succ,
},
revert hgt,
apply not_lt_of_ge,
apply x_le_k,
intro x_eq_k,
revert hgt,
rw x_eq_k,
apply nat.lt_irrefl,
apply not_lt_of_lt,
apply hgt
}
end
/- Helper for the induction step -/
lemma pigeonhole_ind_step {m S fm fx : ℕ} :
0 < m →
S ≤ m * fx →
nat.succ m * fm < S + fm →
S + fm ≤ nat.succ m * fx :=
begin
change nat.succ m with m + 1,
intros m_pos ind_hyp h2,
rw [add_mul, one_mul],
apply add_le_add ind_hyp,
apply le_of_mul_le_mul_left _ m_pos,
apply le_trans _ ind_hyp,
rw ← nat.add_le_add_iff_le_right fm,
rw [add_mul, one_mul] at h2,
exact nat.le_of_lt h2
end
/- Version of the target statement for partial_sum, proved by induction -/
lemma pigeonhole_partial {n m : ℕ} (f : fin n → ℕ) :
1 ≤ m → ∀ (m_le_n : m ≤ n),
exists x, partial_sum m m_le_n f ≤ m * f x :=
begin
intro m_ge_1, induction m_ge_1 with k k_ge_1 induction_hypothesis,
{ -- base case m = 1
intro n_ge_1, existsi (⟨0, n_ge_1⟩ : fin n),
rw partial_sum_succ,
change 0 + f ⟨0, n_ge_1⟩ ≤ 1 * f ⟨0, n_ge_1⟩,
simp,
},
{ -- induction step
intro k_lt_n,
-- either f k works, or it doesn't
let top : fin n := ⟨ k, k_lt_n ⟩,
cases nat.lt_or_ge (nat.succ k * f top) (partial_sum (nat.succ k) k_lt_n f)
with top_not_ok top_ok,
{ -- top doesn't work; use the induction hypothesis
cases induction_hypothesis (nat.le_of_succ_le k_lt_n) with x x_ok,
existsi x,
apply pigeonhole_ind_step k_ge_1 x_ok top_not_ok
},
{ -- top works! use it
existsi top, exact top_ok
}
}
end
/- The main statement then follows immediately. -/
theorem pigeonhole_principle {n : ℕ} (n_pos : 1 ≤ n) (f : fin n → ℕ) :
exists x : fin n, sum_of f ≤ n * f x := by apply pigeonhole_partial _ n_pos
/- Alternative formulation: given a function f : fin m → fin n,
there should be an element x of fin n whose preimage has at
least m / n elements.
But that means we need some way to count the size of the preimage.
-/
lemma sum_of_indicator {n : ℕ} (fx : fin n) :
sum_of (λ (y : fin n), if fx = y then 1 else 0) = 1 :=
begin
rw sum_of,
rw partial_sum_of_indicator n (nat.le_refl n) fx,
rw if_pos,
cases fx,
exact fx_is_lt
end
lemma sum_of_zero {n : ℕ} : sum_of (λ x : fin n, 0) = 0 :=
partial_sum_of_zero _
lemma sum_of_add {n : ℕ} (f g : fin n → ℕ) :
sum_of (λ x, f x + g x) = sum_of f + sum_of g :=
partial_sum_of_add _ _ _ _
lemma sum_of_one {n : ℕ} : sum_of (λ x : fin n, 1) = n :=
partial_sum_of_one _
lemma sum_of_equality {n : ℕ} (f g : fin n → ℕ) :
(∀ x, f x = g x) → sum_of f = sum_of g := partial_sum_eq _ _ _
lemma partial_order_of_summation {m n k : ℕ} (k_le_m : k ≤ m) (f : fin m → fin n → nat) :
partial_sum k k_le_m (λ x, sum_of (λ y, f x y)) =
sum_of (λ y, partial_sum k k_le_m (λ x, f x y)) :=
begin
induction k with k ind_hyp,
{
rw partial_sum_zero, apply sum_of_zero.symm
},
{
rename k_le_m succ_k_le_m,
rw partial_sum_succ,
have rhs : sum_of (λ y : fin n, partial_sum (nat.succ k) succ_k_le_m
(λ x : fin m, f x y)) =
sum_of (λ y : fin n, partial_sum k (nat.le_of_succ_le succ_k_le_m)
(λ x : fin m, f x y) + f ⟨ k, _ ⟩ y),
{
apply sum_of_equality, intro y, rw partial_sum_succ
},
rw rhs,
rw ind_hyp (nat.le_of_succ_le succ_k_le_m),
rw sum_of_add
}
end
theorem order_of_summation {m n : ℕ} (f : fin m → fin n → nat) :
sum_of (λ x : fin m, sum_of (λ y : fin n, f x y)) =
sum_of (λ y : fin n, sum_of (λ x : fin m, f x y)) :=
begin
apply partial_order_of_summation
end
/- the sizes of the preimages sum to the size of the domain -/
def preimage_size {m n : ℕ} (f : fin m → fin n) (y : fin n) : ℕ :=
sum_of (λ x, if f x = y then 1 else 0)
lemma sum_of_preimage_size {m n : ℕ} (f : fin m → fin n) :
sum_of (preimage_size f) = m :=
begin
change sum_of (λ y, sum_of (λ x, if f x = y then 1 else 0)) = m,
rw order_of_summation,
have h : sum_of (λ (x : fin m), sum_of (λ (y : fin n), ite (f x = y) 1 0)) =
sum_of (λ (x : fin m), 1),
{
apply sum_of_equality, intro x, apply sum_of_indicator
},
rewrite h,
apply sum_of_one
end
theorem pigeonhole_principle_bis {m n : ℕ} (n_pos : 1 ≤ n) (f : fin m → fin n) :
exists y : fin n, m ≤ n * preimage_size f y :=
begin
have preimage_sum := sum_of_preimage_size f,
have pp1 := pigeonhole_principle n_pos (λ y : fin n, preimage_size f y),
rw preimage_sum at pp1,
exact pp1
end
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.