blob_id stringlengths 40 40 | directory_id stringlengths 40 40 | path stringlengths 7 139 | content_id stringlengths 40 40 | detected_licenses listlengths 0 16 | license_type stringclasses 2
values | repo_name stringlengths 7 55 | snapshot_id stringlengths 40 40 | revision_id stringlengths 40 40 | branch_name stringclasses 6
values | visit_date int64 1,471B 1,694B | revision_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | committer_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | github_id float64 1.33M 604M ⌀ | star_events_count int64 0 43.5k | fork_events_count int64 0 1.5k | gha_license_id stringclasses 6
values | gha_event_created_at int64 1,402B 1,695B ⌀ | gha_created_at int64 1,359B 1,637B ⌀ | gha_language stringclasses 19
values | src_encoding stringclasses 2
values | language stringclasses 1
value | is_vendor bool 1
class | is_generated bool 1
class | length_bytes int64 3 6.4M | extension stringclasses 4
values | content stringlengths 3 6.12M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
80b756c90c892e976a1485af0f1d7e3b707c9cd1 | 26ac254ecb57ffcb886ff709cf018390161a9225 | /src/algebraic_geometry/presheafed_space.lean | e02df88471a8616e31ae696627fe9ea632d8783e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | eric-wieser/mathlib | 42842584f584359bbe1fc8b88b3ff937c8acd72d | d0df6b81cd0920ad569158c06a3fd5abb9e63301 | refs/heads/master | 1,669,546,404,255 | 1,595,254,668,000 | 1,595,254,668,000 | 281,173,504 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,263,582,000 | 1,595,263,581,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,351 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import topology.sheaves.presheaf
/-!
# Presheafed spaces
Introduces the category of topological spaces equipped with a presheaf (taking values in an
arbitrary target category `C`.)
We further describe how to apply functors and natural transformations to the values of the
presheaves.
-/
universes v u
open category_theory
open Top
open topological_space
open opposite
open category_theory.category category_theory.functor
variables (C : Type u) [𝒞 : category.{v} C]
include 𝒞
local attribute [tidy] tactic.op_induction'
namespace algebraic_geometry
/-- A `PresheafedSpace C` is a topological space equipped with a presheaf of `C`s. -/
structure PresheafedSpace :=
(to_Top : Top)
(𝒪 : to_Top.presheaf C)
variables {C}
namespace PresheafedSpace
instance coe_to_Top : has_coe (PresheafedSpace C) Top :=
{ coe := λ X, X.to_Top }
@[simp] lemma as_coe (X : PresheafedSpace C) : X.to_Top = (X : Top.{v}) := rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_coe (to_Top) (𝒪) : (({ to_Top := to_Top, 𝒪 := 𝒪 } :
PresheafedSpace.{v} C) : Top.{v}) = to_Top := rfl
instance (X : PresheafedSpace.{v} C) : topological_space X := X.to_Top.str
/-- A morphism between presheafed spaces `X` and `Y` consists of a continuous map
`f` between the underlying topological spaces, and a (notice contravariant!) map
from the presheaf on `Y` to the pushforward of the presheaf on `X` via `f`. -/
structure hom (X Y : PresheafedSpace C) :=
(f : (X : Top.{v}) ⟶ (Y : Top.{v}))
(c : Y.𝒪 ⟶ f _* X.𝒪)
@[ext] lemma ext {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (α β : hom X Y)
(w : α.f = β.f) (h : α.c ≫ (whisker_right (nat_trans.op (opens.map_iso _ _ w).inv) X.𝒪) = β.c) :
α = β :=
begin
cases α, cases β,
dsimp [presheaf.pushforward] at *,
tidy, -- TODO including `injections` would make tidy work earlier.
end
.
def id (X : PresheafedSpace C) : hom X X :=
{ f := 𝟙 (X : Top.{v}),
c := ((functor.left_unitor _).inv) ≫ (whisker_right (nat_trans.op (opens.map_id (X.to_Top)).hom) _) }
def comp (X Y Z : PresheafedSpace C) (α : hom X Y) (β : hom Y Z) : hom X Z :=
{ f := α.f ≫ β.f,
c := β.c ≫ (whisker_left (opens.map β.f).op α.c) ≫ (Top.presheaf.pushforward.comp _ _ _).inv }
variables (C)
section
local attribute [simp] id comp presheaf.pushforward
/- The proofs below can be done by `tidy`, but it is too slow,
and we don't have a tactic caching mechanism. -/
/-- The category of PresheafedSpaces. Morphisms are pairs, a continuous map and a presheaf map
from the presheaf on the target to the pushforward of the presheaf on the source. -/
instance category_of_PresheafedSpaces : category (PresheafedSpace C) :=
{ hom := hom,
id := id,
comp := comp,
id_comp' := λ X Y f,
begin
ext1, swap,
{ dsimp, simp only [id_comp] },
{ ext U, op_induction, cases U,
dsimp,
simp only [comp_id, id_comp, map_id, presheaf.pushforward, presheaf.pushforward.comp_inv_app],
dsimp,
simp only [comp_id], },
end,
comp_id' := λ X Y f,
begin
ext1, swap,
{ dsimp, simp only [comp_id] },
{ ext U, op_induction, cases U,
dsimp,
simp only [comp_id, id_comp, map_id, presheaf.pushforward, presheaf.pushforward.comp_inv_app],
dsimp,
simp only [comp_id], }
end,
assoc' := λ W X Y Z f g h,
begin
ext1, swap,
refl,
{ ext U, op_induction, cases U,
dsimp,
simp only [assoc, map_id, comp_id, presheaf.pushforward, presheaf.pushforward.comp_inv_app],
dsimp,
simp only [comp_id, id_comp], }
end }
end
variables {C}
instance {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} : has_coe (X ⟶ Y) ((X : Top.{v}) ⟶ (Y : Top.{v})) :=
{ coe := λ α, α.f }
-- see Note [function coercion]
instance {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} : has_coe_to_fun (X ⟶ Y) :=
⟨λ _, (X : Top.{v}) → Y.to_Top, λ h, h⟩
@[simp] lemma hom_mk_coe {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (f) (c) :
(({ f := f, c := c } : X ⟶ Y) : (X : Top.{v}) ⟶ (Y : Top.{v})) = f := rfl
@[simp] lemma f_as_coe {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (α : X ⟶ Y) :
α.f = (α : (X : Top.{v}) ⟶ (Y : Top.{v})) := rfl
@[simp] lemma id_coe (X : PresheafedSpace C) :
(((𝟙 X) : X ⟶ X) : (X : Top.{v}) ⟶ X) = 𝟙 (X : Top.{v}) := rfl
@[simp] lemma id_coe_fn (X : PresheafedSpace C) :
(((𝟙 X) : X ⟶ X) : (X : Top.{v}) → X) = 𝟙 (X : Top.{v}) := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_coe {X Y Z : PresheafedSpace C} (α : X ⟶ Y) (β : Y ⟶ Z) :
((α ≫ β : X ⟶ Z) : (X : Top.{v}) ⟶ Z) = (α : (X : Top.{v}) ⟶ Y) ≫ (β : Y ⟶ Z) := rfl
lemma id_c (X : PresheafedSpace C) :
((𝟙 X) : X ⟶ X).c =
(((functor.left_unitor _).inv) ≫ (whisker_right (nat_trans.op (opens.map_id (X.to_Top)).hom) _)) := rfl
-- Implementation note: this harmless looking lemma causes deterministic timeouts,
-- but happily we can survive without it.
-- lemma comp_c {X Y Z : PresheafedSpace.{v} C} (α : X ⟶ Y) (β : Y ⟶ Z) :
-- (α ≫ β).c = (β.c ≫ (whisker_left (opens.map β.f).op α.c)) := rfl
@[simp] lemma id_c_app (X : PresheafedSpace C) (U) :
((𝟙 X) : X ⟶ X).c.app U = eq_to_hom (by { op_induction U, cases U, refl }) :=
by { op_induction U, cases U, simp only [id_c], dsimp, simp, }
@[simp] lemma comp_c_app {X Y Z : PresheafedSpace C} (α : X ⟶ Y) (β : Y ⟶ Z) (U) :
(α ≫ β).c.app U = (β.c).app U ≫ (α.c).app (op ((opens.map (β.f)).obj (unop U))) ≫
(Top.presheaf.pushforward.comp _ _ _).inv.app U := rfl
/-- The forgetful functor from `PresheafedSpace` to `Top`. -/
def forget : PresheafedSpace C ⥤ Top :=
{ obj := λ X, (X : Top.{v}),
map := λ X Y f, f }
end PresheafedSpace
end algebraic_geometry
open algebraic_geometry algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace
variables {C}
namespace category_theory
variables {D : Type u} [category.{v} D]
local attribute [simp] presheaf.pushforward
namespace functor
/-- We can apply a functor `F : C ⥤ D` to the values of the presheaf in any `PresheafedSpace C`,
giving a functor `PresheafedSpace C ⥤ PresheafedSpace D` -/
/- The proofs below can be done by `tidy`, but it is too slow,
and we don't have a tactic caching mechanism. -/
def map_presheaf (F : C ⥤ D) : PresheafedSpace C ⥤ PresheafedSpace D :=
{ obj := λ X, { to_Top := X.to_Top, 𝒪 := X.𝒪 ⋙ F },
map := λ X Y f, { f := f.f, c := whisker_right f.c F },
map_id' := λ X,
begin
ext1, swap,
{ refl },
{ ext,
dsimp,
simp only [presheaf.pushforward, eq_to_hom_map, map_id, comp_id, id_c_app],
refl }
end,
map_comp' := λ X Y Z f g,
begin
ext1, swap,
{ refl, },
{ ext, dsimp,
simp only [comp_id, assoc, map_comp, map_id, comp_c_app,
presheaf.pushforward, presheaf.pushforward.comp_inv_app],
dsimp,
simp only [comp_id, map_id] }
end }
@[simp] lemma map_presheaf_obj_X (F : C ⥤ D) (X : PresheafedSpace C) :
((F.map_presheaf.obj X) : Top.{v}) = (X : Top.{v}) := rfl
@[simp] lemma map_presheaf_obj_𝒪 (F : C ⥤ D) (X : PresheafedSpace C) :
(F.map_presheaf.obj X).𝒪 = X.𝒪 ⋙ F := rfl
@[simp] lemma map_presheaf_map_f (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
((F.map_presheaf.map f) : (X : Top.{v}) ⟶ (Y : Top.{v})) = f := rfl
@[simp] lemma map_presheaf_map_c (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(F.map_presheaf.map f).c = whisker_right f.c F := rfl
end functor
namespace nat_trans
/- The proofs below can be done by `tidy`, but it is too slow,
and we don't have a tactic caching mechanism. -/
def on_presheaf {F G : C ⥤ D} (α : F ⟶ G) : G.map_presheaf ⟶ F.map_presheaf :=
{ app := λ X,
{ f := 𝟙 _,
c := whisker_left X.𝒪 α ≫ ((functor.left_unitor _).inv) ≫
(whisker_right (nat_trans.op (opens.map_id X.to_Top).hom) _) },
naturality' := λ X Y f,
begin
ext1, swap,
{ refl },
{ ext U,
op_induction,
cases U,
dsimp,
simp only [comp_id, assoc, map_id, presheaf.pushforward, presheaf.pushforward.comp_inv_app],
dsimp,
simp only [comp_id, nat_trans.naturality], }
end }
-- TODO Assemble the last two constructions into a functor
-- `(C ⥤ D) ⥤ (PresheafedSpace C ⥤ PresheafedSpace D)`
end nat_trans
end category_theory
|
ff5bd37ef7dc9fff001e96bc8dd3916842ba522e | 367134ba5a65885e863bdc4507601606690974c1 | /src/data/nat/fib.lean | d3891e40615a728c16f17e9247413ec274cf54f8 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kodyvajjha/mathlib | 9bead00e90f68269a313f45f5561766cfd8d5cad | b98af5dd79e13a38d84438b850a2e8858ec21284 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,350,366,310 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 162,666,963 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,545,367,651,000 | 1,545,367,651,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,555 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kevin Kappelmann. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Kappelmann
-/
import data.stream.basic
import tactic
import data.nat.gcd
/-!
# The Fibonacci Sequence
## Summary
Definition of the Fibonacci sequence `F₀ = 0, F₁ = 1, Fₙ₊₂ = Fₙ + Fₙ₊₁`.
## Main Definitions
- `fib` returns the stream of Fibonacci numbers.
## Main Statements
- `fib_succ_succ` : shows that `fib` indeed satisfies the Fibonacci recurrence `Fₙ₊₂ = Fₙ + Fₙ₊₁.`.
- `fib_gcd` : `fib n` is a strong divisibility sequence.
## Implementation Notes
For efficiency purposes, the sequence is defined using `stream.iterate`.
## Tags
fib, fibonacci
-/
namespace nat
/-- Auxiliary function used in the definition of `fib_aux_stream`. -/
private def fib_aux_step : (ℕ × ℕ) → (ℕ × ℕ) := λ p, ⟨p.snd, p.fst + p.snd⟩
/-- Auxiliary stream creating Fibonacci pairs `⟨Fₙ, Fₙ₊₁⟩`. -/
private def fib_aux_stream : stream (ℕ × ℕ) := stream.iterate fib_aux_step ⟨0, 1⟩
/--
Implementation of the fibonacci sequence satisfying
`fib 0 = 0, fib 1 = 1, fib (n + 2) = fib n + fib (n + 1)`.
*Note:* We use a stream iterator for better performance when compared to the naive recursive
implementation.
-/
@[pp_nodot]
def fib (n : ℕ) : ℕ := (fib_aux_stream n).fst
@[simp] lemma fib_zero : fib 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma fib_one : fib 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma fib_two : fib 2 = 1 := rfl
private lemma fib_aux_stream_succ {n : ℕ} :
fib_aux_stream (n + 1) = fib_aux_step (fib_aux_stream n) :=
begin
change (stream.nth (n + 1) $ stream.iterate fib_aux_step ⟨0, 1⟩) =
fib_aux_step (stream.nth n $ stream.iterate fib_aux_step ⟨0, 1⟩),
rw [stream.nth_succ_iterate, stream.map_iterate, stream.nth_map]
end
/-- Shows that `fib` indeed satisfies the Fibonacci recurrence `Fₙ₊₂ = Fₙ + Fₙ₊₁.` -/
lemma fib_succ_succ {n : ℕ} : fib (n + 2) = fib n + fib (n + 1) :=
by simp only [fib, fib_aux_stream_succ, fib_aux_step]
lemma fib_pos {n : ℕ} (n_pos : 0 < n) : 0 < fib n :=
begin
induction n with n IH,
case nat.zero { norm_num at n_pos },
case nat.succ
{ cases n,
case nat.zero { simp [fib_succ_succ, zero_lt_one] },
case nat.succ
{ have : 0 ≤ fib n, by simp,
exact (lt_add_of_nonneg_of_lt this $ IH n.succ_pos) }}
end
lemma fib_le_fib_succ {n : ℕ} : fib n ≤ fib (n + 1) := by { cases n; simp [fib_succ_succ] }
@[mono] lemma fib_mono : monotone fib :=
monotone_of_monotone_nat $ λ _, fib_le_fib_succ
lemma le_fib_self {n : ℕ} (five_le_n : 5 ≤ n) : n ≤ fib n :=
begin
induction five_le_n with n five_le_n IH,
{ have : 5 = fib 5, by refl, -- 5 ≤ fib 5
exact le_of_eq this },
{ -- n + 1 ≤ fib (n + 1) for 5 ≤ n
cases n with n', -- rewrite n = succ n' to use fib.succ_succ
{ have : 5 = 0, from nat.le_zero_iff.elim_left five_le_n, contradiction },
rw fib_succ_succ,
suffices : 1 + (n' + 1) ≤ fib n' + fib (n' + 1), by rwa [nat.succ_eq_add_one, add_comm],
have : n' ≠ 0, by { intro h, have : 5 ≤ 1, by rwa h at five_le_n, norm_num at this },
have : 1 ≤ fib n', from nat.succ_le_of_lt (fib_pos $ pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr this),
mono }
end
/-- Subsequent Fibonacci numbers are coprime,
see https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Consecutive_Fibonacci_Numbers_are_Coprime -/
lemma fib_coprime_fib_succ (n : ℕ) : nat.coprime (fib n) (fib (n + 1)) :=
begin
unfold coprime,
induction n with n ih,
{ simp },
{ convert ih using 1,
rw [fib_succ_succ, succ_eq_add_one, gcd_rec, add_mod_right, gcd_comm (fib n),
gcd_rec (fib (n + 1))], }
end
/-- See https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fibonacci_Number_in_terms_of_Smaller_Fibonacci_Numbers -/
lemma fib_add (m n : ℕ) :
fib m * fib n + fib (m + 1) * fib (n + 1) = fib (m + n + 1) :=
begin
induction n with n ih generalizing m,
{ simp },
{ intros,
specialize ih (m + 1),
rw [add_assoc m 1 n, add_comm 1 n] at ih,
simp only [fib_succ_succ, ← ih],
ring, }
end
lemma gcd_fib_add_self (m n : ℕ) : gcd (fib m) (fib (n + m)) = gcd (fib m) (fib n) :=
begin
cases eq_zero_or_pos n,
{ rw h, simp },
replace h := nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos h, rw [← h, succ_eq_add_one],
calc gcd (fib m) (fib (n.pred + 1 + m))
= gcd (fib m) (fib (n.pred) * (fib m) + fib (n.pred + 1) * fib (m + 1)) :
by { rw fib_add n.pred _, ring }
... = gcd (fib m) (fib (n.pred + 1) * fib (m + 1)) :
by rw [add_comm, gcd_add_mul_self (fib m) _ (fib (n.pred))]
... = gcd (fib m) (fib (n.pred + 1)) :
coprime.gcd_mul_right_cancel_right
(fib (n.pred + 1)) (coprime.symm (fib_coprime_fib_succ m))
end
lemma gcd_fib_add_mul_self (m n : ℕ) : ∀ k, gcd (fib m) (fib (n + k * m)) = gcd (fib m) (fib n)
| 0 := by simp
| (k+1) := by rw [← gcd_fib_add_mul_self k, add_mul, ← add_assoc, one_mul, gcd_fib_add_self _ _]
/-- `fib n` is a strong divisibility sequence,
see https://proofwiki.org/wiki/GCD_of_Fibonacci_Numbers -/
lemma fib_gcd (m n : ℕ) : fib (gcd m n) = gcd (fib m) (fib n) :=
begin
wlog h : m ≤ n using [n m, m n],
exact le_total m n,
{ apply gcd.induction m n,
{ simp },
intros m n mpos h,
rw ← gcd_rec m n at h,
conv_rhs { rw ← mod_add_div' n m },
rwa [gcd_fib_add_mul_self m (n % m) (n / m), gcd_comm (fib m) _] },
rwa [gcd_comm, gcd_comm (fib m)]
end
lemma fib_dvd (m n : ℕ) (h : m ∣ n) : fib m ∣ fib n :=
by rwa [gcd_eq_left_iff_dvd, ← fib_gcd, gcd_eq_left_iff_dvd.mp]
end nat
|
385c3f0d41178291108ab9ae9d7b8f406f78387d | a9d0fb7b0e4f802bd3857b803e6c5c23d87fef91 | /tests/lean/run/untrusted_examples.lean | 6f230473b5a1794dbb80bbdc2974bdbe62691d07 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean-osx | 4a954262c780e404c1369d6c06516161d07fcb40 | 3670278342d2f4faa49d95b46d86642d7875b47c | refs/heads/master | 1,611,410,334,552 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 12,043,103 | 5 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 217 | lean | open tactic
set_option pp.all true
example (m1 : tactic nat) (m2 : nat → tactic bool) : true :=
by do
m1 ← get_local `m1,
m2 ← get_local `m2,
b ← mk_app `monad.bind [m1, m2],
trace b,
constructor
|
dc7fcac0188f78927cc0dbd1a74adf4a32857bee | 63abd62053d479eae5abf4951554e1064a4c45b4 | /archive/imo/imo1960_q1.lean | 8266f10b39407889375a18df4d43b541d442d2c8 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Lix0120/mathlib | 0020745240315ed0e517cbf32e738d8f9811dd80 | e14c37827456fc6707f31b4d1d16f1f3a3205e91 | refs/heads/master | 1,673,102,855,024 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 308,930,245 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,604,164,710,000 | 1,604,163,547,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,339 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kevin Lacker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Lacker
-/
import data.nat.digits
/-!
# IMO 1960 Q1
Determine all three-digit numbers $N$ having the property that $N$ is divisible by 11, and
$\dfrac{N}{11}$ is equal to the sum of the squares of the digits of $N$.
Since Lean doesn't have a way to directly express problem statements of the form
"Determine all X satisfying Y", we express two predicates where proving that one implies the
other is equivalent to solving the problem. A human solver also has to discover the
second predicate.
The strategy here is roughly brute force, checking the possible multiples of 11.
-/
open nat
def sum_of_squares (L : list ℕ) : ℕ := (L.map (λ x, x * x)).sum
def problem_predicate (n : ℕ) : Prop :=
(nat.digits 10 n).length = 3 ∧ 11 ∣ n ∧ n / 11 = sum_of_squares (nat.digits 10 n)
def solution_predicate (n : ℕ) : Prop := n = 550 ∨ n = 803
/-
Proving that three digit numbers are the ones in [100, 1000).
-/
lemma not_zero {n : ℕ} (h1 : problem_predicate n) : n ≠ 0 :=
have h2 : nat.digits 10 n ≠ list.nil, from list.ne_nil_of_length_eq_succ h1.left,
digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero.mp h2
lemma ge_100 {n : ℕ} (h1 : problem_predicate n) : 100 ≤ n :=
have h2 : 10^3 ≤ 10 * n, begin
rw ← h1.left,
refine nat.base_pow_length_digits_le 10 n _ (not_zero h1),
simp,
end,
by linarith
lemma lt_1000 {n : ℕ} (h1 : problem_predicate n) : n < 1000 :=
have h2 : n < 10^3, begin
rw ← h1.left,
refine nat.lt_base_pow_length_digits _,
simp,
end,
by linarith
/-
We do an exhaustive search to show that all results are covered by `solution_predicate`.
-/
def search_up_to (c n : ℕ) : Prop :=
n = c * 11 ∧ ∀ m : ℕ, m < n → problem_predicate m → solution_predicate m
lemma search_up_to_start : search_up_to 9 99 := ⟨rfl, λ n h p, by linarith [ge_100 p]⟩
lemma search_up_to_step {c n} (H : search_up_to c n)
{c' n'} (ec : c + 1 = c') (en : n + 11 = n')
{l} (el : nat.digits 10 n = l)
(H' : c = sum_of_squares l → c = 50 ∨ c = 73) :
search_up_to c' n' :=
begin
subst ec, subst en, subst el,
obtain ⟨rfl, H⟩ := H,
refine ⟨by ring, λ m l p, _⟩,
obtain ⟨h₁, ⟨m, rfl⟩, h₂⟩ := id p,
by_cases h : 11 * m < c * 11, { exact H _ h p },
have : m = c, {linarith}, subst m,
rw [nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ (by norm_num : 11 > 0), mul_comm] at h₂,
refine (H' h₂).imp _ _; {rintro rfl, norm_num}
end
lemma search_up_to_end {c} (H : search_up_to c 1001)
{n : ℕ} (ppn : problem_predicate n) : solution_predicate n :=
H.2 _ (by linarith [lt_1000 ppn]) ppn
lemma right_direction {n : ℕ} : problem_predicate n → solution_predicate n :=
begin
have := search_up_to_start,
iterate 82 {
replace := search_up_to_step this (by norm_num1; refl) (by norm_num1; refl)
(by norm_digits; refl) dec_trivial },
exact search_up_to_end this
end
/-
Now we just need to prove the equivalence, for the precise problem statement.
-/
lemma left_direction (n : ℕ) (spn : solution_predicate n) : problem_predicate n :=
by rcases spn with (rfl | rfl); norm_num [problem_predicate, sum_of_squares]
theorem imo1960_q1 (n : ℕ) : problem_predicate n ↔ solution_predicate n :=
⟨right_direction, left_direction n⟩
|
08cd5eed63cce671e2b78d75247a644210dd975c | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/data/multiset/interval.lean | af501ed5fd1bd056105b65a7566423c30d0fbaf1 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,273 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import data.finset.locally_finite
import data.dfinsupp.interval
import data.dfinsupp.multiset
import data.nat.interval
/-!
# Finite intervals of multisets
This file provides the `locally_finite_order` instance for `multiset α` and calculates the
cardinality of its finite intervals.
## Implementation notes
We implement the intervals via the intervals on `dfinsupp`, rather than via filtering
`multiset.powerset`; this is because `(multiset.repeat x n).powerset` has `2^n` entries not `n+1`
entries as it contains duplicates. We do not go via `finsupp` as this would be noncomputable, and
multisets are typically used computationally.
-/
open finset dfinsupp function
open_locale big_operators pointwise
variables {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*}
namespace multiset
variables [decidable_eq α] (f g : multiset α)
instance : locally_finite_order (multiset α) :=
locally_finite_order.of_Icc (multiset α)
(λ f g, (finset.Icc f.to_dfinsupp g.to_dfinsupp).map
(multiset.equiv_dfinsupp.to_equiv.symm.to_embedding))
(λ f g x, by simp)
lemma Icc_eq :
finset.Icc f g =
(finset.Icc f.to_dfinsupp g.to_dfinsupp).map
(multiset.equiv_dfinsupp.to_equiv.symm.to_embedding) := rfl
lemma card_Icc :
(finset.Icc f g).card = ∏ i in f.to_finset ∪ g.to_finset, (g.count i + 1 - f.count i) :=
by simp_rw [Icc_eq, finset.card_map, dfinsupp.card_Icc, nat.card_Icc, multiset.to_dfinsupp_apply,
to_dfinsupp_support]
lemma card_Ico :
(finset.Ico f g).card = ∏ i in f.to_finset ∪ g.to_finset, (g.count i + 1 - f.count i) - 1 :=
by rw [card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one, card_Icc]
lemma card_Ioc :
(finset.Ioc f g).card = ∏ i in f.to_finset ∪ g.to_finset, (g.count i + 1 - f.count i) - 1 :=
by rw [card_Ioc_eq_card_Icc_sub_one, card_Icc]
lemma card_Ioo :
(finset.Ioo f g).card = ∏ i in f.to_finset ∪ g.to_finset, (g.count i + 1 - f.count i) - 2 :=
by rw [card_Ioo_eq_card_Icc_sub_two, card_Icc]
lemma card_Iic :
(finset.Iic f).card = ∏ i in f.to_finset, (f.count i + 1) :=
by simp_rw [Iic_eq_Icc, card_Icc, bot_eq_zero, to_finset_zero, empty_union, count_zero, tsub_zero]
end multiset
|
9715c609f40d3aa37b5bf049c4522eea16ecf817 | c09f5945267fd905e23a77be83d9a78580e04a4a | /src/topology/algebra/uniform_group.lean | a1419c83651dd306f207e59e984675827b4c9a8b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | OHIHIYA20/mathlib | 023a6df35355b5b6eb931c404f7dd7535dccfa89 | 1ec0a1f49db97d45e8666a3bf33217ff79ca1d87 | refs/heads/master | 1,587,964,529,965 | 1,551,819,319,000 | 1,551,819,319,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 20,465 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl
Uniform structure on topological groups:
* `topological_add_group.to_uniform_space` and `topological_add_group_is_uniform` can be used to
construct a canonical uniformity for a topological add group.
* extension of ℤ-bilinear maps to complete groups (useful for ring completions)
* `add_group_with_zero_nhd`: construct the topological structure from a group with a neighbourhood
around zero. Then with `topological_add_group.to_uniform_space` one can derive a `uniform_space`.
-/
import topology.uniform_space.uniform_embedding topology.uniform_space.separation topology.algebra.group
noncomputable theory
local attribute [instance, priority 0] classical.prop_decidable
section uniform_add_group
open filter set
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
/-- A uniform (additive) group is a group in which the addition and negation are
uniformly continuous. -/
class uniform_add_group (α : Type*) [uniform_space α] [add_group α] : Prop :=
(uniform_continuous_sub : uniform_continuous (λp:α×α, p.1 - p.2))
theorem uniform_add_group.mk' {α} [uniform_space α] [add_group α]
(h₁ : uniform_continuous (λp:α×α, p.1 + p.2))
(h₂ : uniform_continuous (λp:α, -p)) : uniform_add_group α :=
⟨(uniform_continuous_fst.prod_mk (uniform_continuous_snd.comp h₂)).comp h₁⟩
variables [uniform_space α] [add_group α] [uniform_add_group α]
lemma uniform_continuous_sub' : uniform_continuous (λp:α×α, p.1 - p.2) :=
uniform_add_group.uniform_continuous_sub α
lemma uniform_continuous_sub [uniform_space β] {f : β → α} {g : β → α}
(hf : uniform_continuous f) (hg : uniform_continuous g) : uniform_continuous (λx, f x - g x) :=
(hf.prod_mk hg).comp uniform_continuous_sub'
lemma uniform_continuous_neg [uniform_space β] {f : β → α}
(hf : uniform_continuous f) : uniform_continuous (λx, - f x) :=
have uniform_continuous (λx, 0 - f x),
from uniform_continuous_sub uniform_continuous_const hf,
by simp * at *
lemma uniform_continuous_neg' : uniform_continuous (λx:α, - x) :=
uniform_continuous_neg uniform_continuous_id
lemma uniform_continuous_add [uniform_space β] {f : β → α} {g : β → α}
(hf : uniform_continuous f) (hg : uniform_continuous g) : uniform_continuous (λx, f x + g x) :=
have uniform_continuous (λx, f x - - g x),
from uniform_continuous_sub hf $ uniform_continuous_neg hg,
by simp * at *
lemma uniform_continuous_add' : uniform_continuous (λp:α×α, p.1 + p.2) :=
uniform_continuous_add uniform_continuous_fst uniform_continuous_snd
instance uniform_add_group.to_topological_add_group : topological_add_group α :=
{ continuous_add := uniform_continuous_add'.continuous,
continuous_neg := uniform_continuous_neg'.continuous }
instance [uniform_space β] [add_group β] [uniform_add_group β] : uniform_add_group (α × β) :=
⟨uniform_continuous.prod_mk
(uniform_continuous_sub
(uniform_continuous_fst.comp uniform_continuous_fst)
(uniform_continuous_snd.comp uniform_continuous_fst))
(uniform_continuous_sub
(uniform_continuous_fst.comp uniform_continuous_snd)
(uniform_continuous_snd.comp uniform_continuous_snd)) ⟩
lemma uniformity_translate (a : α) : uniformity.map (λx:α×α, (x.1 + a, x.2 + a)) = uniformity :=
le_antisymm
(uniform_continuous_add uniform_continuous_id uniform_continuous_const)
(calc uniformity =
(uniformity.map (λx:α×α, (x.1 + -a, x.2 + -a))).map (λx:α×α, (x.1 + a, x.2 + a)) :
by simp [filter.map_map, (∘)]; exact filter.map_id.symm
... ≤ uniformity.map (λx:α×α, (x.1 + a, x.2 + a)) :
filter.map_mono (uniform_continuous_add uniform_continuous_id uniform_continuous_const))
lemma uniform_embedding_translate (a : α) : uniform_embedding (λx:α, x + a) :=
begin
refine ⟨assume x y, eq_of_add_eq_add_right, _⟩,
rw [← uniformity_translate a, comap_map] {occs := occurrences.pos [1]},
rintros ⟨p₁, p₂⟩ ⟨q₁, q₂⟩,
simp [prod.eq_iff_fst_eq_snd_eq] {contextual := tt}
end
section
variables (α)
lemma uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero : uniformity = comap (λx:α×α, x.2 - x.1) (nhds (0:α)) :=
begin
rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, filter.comap_comap_comp],
refine le_antisymm (filter.map_le_iff_le_comap.1 _) _,
{ assume s hs,
rcases mem_uniformity_of_uniform_continuous_invarant uniform_continuous_sub' hs with ⟨t, ht, hts⟩,
refine mem_map.2 (mem_sets_of_superset ht _),
rintros ⟨a, b⟩,
simpa [subset_def] using hts a b a },
{ assume s hs,
rcases mem_uniformity_of_uniform_continuous_invarant uniform_continuous_add' hs with ⟨t, ht, hts⟩,
refine ⟨_, ht, _⟩,
rintros ⟨a, b⟩, simpa [subset_def] using hts 0 (b - a) a }
end
end
lemma group_separation_rel (x y : α) : (x, y) ∈ separation_rel α ↔ x - y ∈ closure ({0} : set α) :=
have embedding (λa, a + (y - x)), from (uniform_embedding_translate (y - x)).embedding,
show (x, y) ∈ ⋂₀ uniformity.sets ↔ x - y ∈ closure ({0} : set α),
begin
rw [this.closure_eq_preimage_closure_image, uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero α, sInter_comap_sets],
simp [mem_closure_iff_nhds, inter_singleton_eq_empty]
end
lemma uniform_continuous_of_tendsto_zero [uniform_space β] [add_group β] [uniform_add_group β]
{f : α → β} [is_add_group_hom f] (h : tendsto f (nhds 0) (nhds 0)) :
uniform_continuous f :=
begin
have : ((λx:β×β, x.2 - x.1) ∘ (λx:α×α, (f x.1, f x.2))) = (λx:α×α, f (x.2 - x.1)),
{ simp only [is_add_group_hom.sub f] },
rw [uniform_continuous, uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero α, uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero β,
tendsto_comap_iff, this],
exact tendsto.comp tendsto_comap h
end
lemma uniform_continuous_of_continuous [uniform_space β] [add_group β] [uniform_add_group β]
{f : α → β} [is_add_group_hom f] (h : continuous f) :
uniform_continuous f :=
uniform_continuous_of_tendsto_zero $
suffices tendsto f (nhds 0) (nhds (f 0)), by rwa [is_add_group_hom.zero f] at this,
h.tendsto 0
end uniform_add_group
section topological_add_comm_group
universes u v w x
open filter
variables {G : Type u} [add_comm_group G] [topological_space G] [topological_add_group G]
variable (G)
def topological_add_group.to_uniform_space : uniform_space G :=
{ uniformity := comap (λp:G×G, p.2 - p.1) (nhds 0),
refl :=
by refine map_le_iff_le_comap.1 (le_trans _ (pure_le_nhds 0));
simp [set.subset_def] {contextual := tt},
symm :=
begin
suffices : tendsto ((λp, -p) ∘ (λp:G×G, p.2 - p.1)) (comap (λp:G×G, p.2 - p.1) (nhds 0)) (nhds (-0)),
{ simpa [(∘), tendsto_comap_iff] },
exact tendsto.comp tendsto_comap (tendsto_neg tendsto_id)
end,
comp :=
begin
intros D H,
rw mem_lift'_sets,
{ rcases H with ⟨U, U_nhds, U_sub⟩,
rcases exists_nhds_half U_nhds with ⟨V, ⟨V_nhds, V_sum⟩⟩,
existsi ((λp:G×G, p.2 - p.1) ⁻¹' V),
have H : (λp:G×G, p.2 - p.1) ⁻¹' V ∈ (comap (λp:G×G, p.2 - p.1) (nhds (0 : G))).sets,
by existsi [V, V_nhds] ; refl,
existsi H,
have comp_rel_sub : comp_rel ((λp:G×G, p.2 - p.1) ⁻¹' V) ((λp:G×G, p.2 - p.1) ⁻¹' V) ⊆ (λp:G×G, p.2 - p.1) ⁻¹' U,
begin
intros p p_comp_rel,
rcases p_comp_rel with ⟨z, ⟨Hz1, Hz2⟩⟩,
simpa using V_sum _ _ Hz1 Hz2
end,
exact set.subset.trans comp_rel_sub U_sub },
{ exact monotone_comp_rel monotone_id monotone_id }
end,
is_open_uniformity :=
begin
intro S,
let S' := λ x, {p : G × G | p.1 = x → p.2 ∈ S},
show is_open S ↔ ∀ (x : G), x ∈ S → S' x ∈ (comap (λp:G×G, p.2 - p.1) (nhds (0 : G))).sets,
rw [is_open_iff_mem_nhds],
refine forall_congr (assume a, forall_congr (assume ha, _)),
rw [← nhds_translation a, mem_comap_sets, mem_comap_sets],
refine exists_congr (assume t, exists_congr (assume ht, _)),
show (λ (y : G), y - a) ⁻¹' t ⊆ S ↔ (λ (p : G × G), p.snd - p.fst) ⁻¹' t ⊆ S' a,
split,
{ rintros h ⟨x, y⟩ hx rfl, exact h hx },
{ rintros h x hx, exact @h (a, x) hx rfl }
end }
section
local attribute [instance] topological_add_group.to_uniform_space
lemma uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero' : uniformity = comap (λp:G×G, p.2 - p.1) (nhds (0 : G)) := rfl
variable {G}
lemma topological_add_group_is_uniform : uniform_add_group G :=
have tendsto
((λp:(G×G), p.1 - p.2) ∘ (λp:(G×G)×(G×G), (p.1.2 - p.1.1, p.2.2 - p.2.1)))
(comap (λp:(G×G)×(G×G), (p.1.2 - p.1.1, p.2.2 - p.2.1)) ((nhds 0).prod (nhds 0)))
(nhds (0 - 0)) :=
tendsto_comap.comp (tendsto_sub tendsto_fst tendsto_snd),
begin
constructor,
rw [uniform_continuous, uniformity_prod_eq_prod, tendsto_map'_iff,
uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero' G, tendsto_comap_iff, prod_comap_comap_eq],
simpa [(∘)]
end
end
lemma to_uniform_space_eq {α : Type*} [u : uniform_space α] [add_comm_group α] [uniform_add_group α]:
topological_add_group.to_uniform_space α = u :=
begin
ext : 1,
show @uniformity α (topological_add_group.to_uniform_space α) = uniformity,
rw [uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero' α, uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero α]
end
end topological_add_comm_group
namespace add_comm_group
section Z_bilin
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*}
variables [add_comm_group α] [add_comm_group β] [add_comm_group γ]
/- TODO: when modules are changed to have more explicit base ring, then change replace `is_Z_bilin`
by using `is_bilinear_map ℤ` from `tensor_product`. -/
class is_Z_bilin (f : α × β → γ) : Prop :=
(add_left : ∀ a a' b, f (a + a', b) = f (a, b) + f (a', b))
(add_right : ∀ a b b', f (a, b + b') = f (a, b) + f (a, b'))
variables (f : α × β → γ) [is_Z_bilin f]
instance is_Z_bilin.comp_hom {g : γ → δ} [add_comm_group δ] [is_add_group_hom g] :
is_Z_bilin (g ∘ f) :=
by constructor; simp [(∘), is_Z_bilin.add_left f, is_Z_bilin.add_right f, is_add_group_hom.add g]
instance is_Z_bilin.comp_swap : is_Z_bilin (f ∘ prod.swap) :=
⟨λ a a' b, is_Z_bilin.add_right f b a a',
λ a b b', is_Z_bilin.add_left f b b' a⟩
lemma is_Z_bilin.zero_left : ∀ b, f (0, b) = 0 :=
begin
intro b,
apply add_self_iff_eq_zero.1,
rw ←is_Z_bilin.add_left f,
simp
end
lemma is_Z_bilin.zero_right : ∀ a, f (a, 0) = 0 :=
is_Z_bilin.zero_left (f ∘ prod.swap)
lemma is_Z_bilin.zero : f (0, 0) = 0 :=
is_Z_bilin.zero_left f 0
lemma is_Z_bilin.neg_left : ∀ a b, f (-a, b) = -f (a, b) :=
begin
intros a b,
apply eq_of_sub_eq_zero,
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_neg, ←is_Z_bilin.add_left f, neg_add_self, is_Z_bilin.zero_left f]
end
lemma is_Z_bilin.neg_right : ∀ a b, f (a, -b) = -f (a, b) :=
assume a b, is_Z_bilin.neg_left (f ∘ prod.swap) b a
lemma is_Z_bilin.sub_left : ∀ a a' b, f (a - a', b) = f (a, b) - f (a', b) :=
begin
intros,
dsimp [algebra.sub],
rw [is_Z_bilin.add_left f, is_Z_bilin.neg_left f]
end
lemma is_Z_bilin.sub_right : ∀ a b b', f (a, b - b') = f (a, b) - f (a,b') :=
assume a b b', is_Z_bilin.sub_left (f ∘ prod.swap) b b' a
end Z_bilin
end add_comm_group
open add_comm_group filter set function
section
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*}
-- α, β and G are abelian topological groups, G is complete Hausdorff
variables [topological_space α] [add_comm_group α] [topological_add_group α]
variables [topological_space β] [add_comm_group β] [topological_add_group β]
variables {G : Type*} [uniform_space G] [add_comm_group G] [uniform_add_group G]
[complete_space G] [separated G]
variables {ψ : α × β → G} (hψ : continuous ψ) [ψbilin : is_Z_bilin ψ]
include hψ ψbilin
lemma is_Z_bilin.tendsto_zero_left (x₁ : α) : tendsto ψ (nhds (x₁, 0)) (nhds 0) :=
begin
have := continuous.tendsto hψ (x₁, 0),
rwa [is_Z_bilin.zero_right ψ] at this
end
lemma is_Z_bilin.tendsto_zero_right (y₁ : β) : tendsto ψ (nhds (0, y₁)) (nhds 0) :=
begin
have := continuous.tendsto hψ (0, y₁),
rwa [is_Z_bilin.zero_left ψ] at this
end
end
section
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
variables [topological_space α] [add_comm_group α] [topological_add_group α]
-- β is a dense subgroup of α, inclusion is denoted by e
variables [topological_space β] [add_comm_group β] [topological_add_group β]
variables {e : β → α} [is_add_group_hom e] (de : dense_embedding e)
include de
lemma tendsto_sub_comap_self (x₀ : α) :
tendsto (λt:β×β, t.2 - t.1) (comap (λp:β×β, (e p.1, e p.2)) $ nhds (x₀, x₀)) (nhds 0) :=
begin
have comm : (λx:α×α, x.2-x.1) ∘ (λt:β×β, (e t.1, e t.2)) = e ∘ (λt:β×β, t.2 - t.1),
{ ext t,
change e t.2 - e t.1 = e (t.2 - t.1),
rwa ← is_add_group_hom.sub e t.2 t.1 },
have lim : tendsto (λ x : α × α, x.2-x.1) (nhds (x₀, x₀)) (nhds (e 0)),
{ have := continuous.tendsto (continuous.comp continuous_swap continuous_sub') (x₀, x₀),
simpa [-sub_eq_add_neg, sub_self, eq.symm (is_add_group_hom.zero e)] using this },
have := de.tendsto_comap_nhds_nhds lim comm,
simp [-sub_eq_add_neg, this]
end
end
namespace dense_embedding
open filter
variables {α : Type*} [topological_space α]
variables {β : Type*} [topological_space β]
variables {γ : Type*} [uniform_space γ] [complete_space γ] [separated γ]
lemma continuous_extend_of_cauchy {e : α → β} {f : α → γ}
(de : dense_embedding e) (h : ∀ b : β, cauchy (map f (comap e $ nhds b))) :
continuous (de.extend f) :=
continuous_extend de $ λ b, complete_space.complete (h b)
end dense_embedding
namespace dense_embedding
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*}
variables {G : Type*}
-- β is a dense subgroup of α, inclusion is denoted by e
-- δ is a dense subgroup of γ, inclusion is denoted by f
variables [topological_space α] [add_comm_group α] [topological_add_group α]
variables [topological_space β] [add_comm_group β] [topological_add_group β]
variables [topological_space γ] [add_comm_group γ] [topological_add_group γ]
variables [topological_space δ] [add_comm_group δ] [topological_add_group δ]
variables [uniform_space G] [add_comm_group G] [uniform_add_group G] [separated G] [complete_space G]
variables {e : β → α} [is_add_group_hom e] (de : dense_embedding e)
variables {f : δ → γ} [is_add_group_hom f] (df : dense_embedding f)
variables {φ : β × δ → G} (hφ : continuous φ) [bilin : is_Z_bilin φ]
include de df hφ bilin
variables {W' : set G} (W'_nhd : W' ∈ (nhds (0 : G)).sets)
include W'_nhd
private lemma extend_Z_bilin_aux (x₀ : α) (y₁ : δ) :
∃ U₂ ∈ (comap e (nhds x₀)).sets, ∀ x x' ∈ U₂, φ (x' - x, y₁) ∈ W' :=
begin
let Nx := nhds x₀,
let ee := λ u : β × β, (e u.1, e u.2),
have lim1 : tendsto (λ a : β × β, (a.2 - a.1, y₁)) (filter.prod (comap e Nx) (comap e Nx)) (nhds (0, y₁)),
{ have := tendsto.prod_mk (tendsto_sub_comap_self de x₀) (tendsto_const_nhds : tendsto (λ (p : β × β), y₁) (comap ee $ nhds (x₀, x₀)) (nhds y₁)),
rw [nhds_prod_eq, prod_comap_comap_eq, ←nhds_prod_eq],
exact (this : _) },
have lim := tendsto.comp lim1 (is_Z_bilin.tendsto_zero_right hφ y₁),
rw tendsto_prod_self_iff at lim,
exact lim W' W'_nhd,
end
private lemma extend_Z_bilin_key (x₀ : α) (y₀ : γ) :
∃ U ∈ (comap e (nhds x₀)).sets, ∃ V ∈ (comap f (nhds y₀)).sets,
∀ x x' ∈ U, ∀ y y' ∈ V, φ (x', y') - φ (x, y) ∈ W' :=
begin
let Nx := nhds x₀,
let Ny := nhds y₀,
let dp := dense_embedding.prod de df,
let ee := λ u : β × β, (e u.1, e u.2),
let ff := λ u : δ × δ, (f u.1, f u.2),
have lim_φ : filter.tendsto φ (nhds (0, 0)) (nhds 0),
{ have := continuous.tendsto hφ (0, 0),
rwa [is_Z_bilin.zero φ] at this },
have lim_φ_sub_sub : tendsto (λ (p : (β × β) × (δ × δ)), φ (p.1.2 - p.1.1, p.2.2 - p.2.1))
(filter.prod (comap ee $ nhds (x₀, x₀)) (comap ff $ nhds (y₀, y₀))) (nhds 0),
{ have lim_sub_sub : tendsto (λ (p : (β × β) × δ × δ), (p.1.2 - p.1.1, p.2.2 - p.2.1))
(filter.prod (comap ee (nhds (x₀, x₀))) (comap ff (nhds (y₀, y₀)))) (filter.prod (nhds 0) (nhds 0)),
{ have := filter.prod_mono (tendsto_sub_comap_self de x₀) (tendsto_sub_comap_self df y₀),
rwa prod_map_map_eq at this },
rw ← nhds_prod_eq at lim_sub_sub,
exact tendsto.comp lim_sub_sub lim_φ },
rcases exists_nhds_quarter W'_nhd with ⟨W, W_nhd, W4⟩,
have : ∃ U₁ ∈ (comap e (nhds x₀)).sets, ∃ V₁ ∈ (comap f (nhds y₀)).sets,
∀ x x' ∈ U₁, ∀ y y' ∈ V₁, φ (x'-x, y'-y) ∈ W,
{ have := tendsto_prod_iff.1 lim_φ_sub_sub W W_nhd,
repeat { rw [nhds_prod_eq, ←prod_comap_comap_eq] at this },
rcases this with ⟨U, U_in, V, V_in, H⟩,
rw [mem_prod_same_iff] at U_in V_in,
rcases U_in with ⟨U₁, U₁_in, HU₁⟩,
rcases V_in with ⟨V₁, V₁_in, HV₁⟩,
existsi [U₁, U₁_in, V₁, V₁_in],
intros x x' x_in x'_in y y' y_in y'_in,
exact H _ _ (HU₁ (mk_mem_prod x_in x'_in)) (HV₁ (mk_mem_prod y_in y'_in)) },
rcases this with ⟨U₁, U₁_nhd, V₁, V₁_nhd, H⟩,
have : ∃ x₁, x₁ ∈ U₁ := exists_mem_of_ne_empty
(forall_sets_neq_empty_iff_neq_bot.2 de.comap_nhds_neq_bot U₁ U₁_nhd),
rcases this with ⟨x₁, x₁_in⟩,
have : ∃ y₁, y₁ ∈ V₁ := exists_mem_of_ne_empty
(forall_sets_neq_empty_iff_neq_bot.2 df.comap_nhds_neq_bot V₁ V₁_nhd),
rcases this with ⟨y₁, y₁_in⟩,
rcases (extend_Z_bilin_aux de df hφ W_nhd x₀ y₁) with ⟨U₂, U₂_nhd, HU⟩,
rcases (extend_Z_bilin_aux df de (continuous.comp continuous_swap hφ) W_nhd y₀ x₁) with ⟨V₂, V₂_nhd, HV⟩,
existsi [U₁ ∩ U₂, inter_mem_sets U₁_nhd U₂_nhd,
V₁ ∩ V₂, inter_mem_sets V₁_nhd V₂_nhd],
rintros x x' ⟨xU₁, xU₂⟩ ⟨x'U₁, x'U₂⟩ y y' ⟨yV₁, yV₂⟩ ⟨y'V₁, y'V₂⟩,
have key_formula : φ(x', y') - φ(x, y) = φ(x' - x, y₁) + φ(x' - x, y' - y₁) + φ(x₁, y' - y) + φ(x - x₁, y' - y),
{ repeat { rw is_Z_bilin.sub_left φ },
repeat { rw is_Z_bilin.sub_right φ },
apply eq_of_sub_eq_zero,
simp },
rw key_formula,
have h₁ := HU x x' xU₂ x'U₂,
have h₂ := H x x' xU₁ x'U₁ y₁ y' y₁_in y'V₁,
have h₃ := HV y y' yV₂ y'V₂,
have h₄ := H x₁ x x₁_in xU₁ y y' yV₁ y'V₁,
exact W4 h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄
end
omit W'_nhd
/-- Bourbaki GT III.6.5 Theorem I:
ℤ-bilinear continuous maps from dense sub-groups into a complete Hausdorff group extend by continuity.
Note: Bourbaki assumes that α and β are also complete Hausdorff, but this is not necessary. -/
theorem extend_Z_bilin : continuous (extend (dense_embedding.prod de df) φ) :=
begin
let dp := dense_embedding.prod de df,
refine dense_embedding.continuous_extend_of_cauchy (dense_embedding.prod de df) _,
rintro ⟨x₀, y₀⟩,
split,
{ apply map_ne_bot,
apply comap_neq_bot,
intros U h,
rcases exists_mem_of_ne_empty (mem_closure_iff_nhds.1 (dp.dense (x₀, y₀)) U h)
with ⟨x, x_in, ⟨z, z_x⟩⟩,
existsi z,
cc },
{ suffices : map (λ (p : (β × δ) × (β × δ)), φ p.2 - φ p.1)
(comap (λ (p : (β × δ) × β × δ), ((e p.1.1, f p.1.2), (e p.2.1, f p.2.2)))
(filter.prod (nhds (x₀, y₀)) (nhds (x₀, y₀)))) ≤ nhds 0,
by rwa [uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero G, prod_map_map_eq, ←map_le_iff_le_comap, filter.map_map,
prod_comap_comap_eq],
intros W' W'_nhd,
have key := extend_Z_bilin_key de df hφ W'_nhd x₀ y₀,
rcases key with ⟨U, U_nhd, V, V_nhd, h⟩,
rw mem_comap_sets at U_nhd,
rcases U_nhd with ⟨U', U'_nhd, U'_sub⟩,
rw mem_comap_sets at V_nhd,
rcases V_nhd with ⟨V', V'_nhd, V'_sub⟩,
rw [mem_map, mem_comap_sets, nhds_prod_eq],
existsi set.prod (set.prod U' V') (set.prod U' V'),
rw mem_prod_same_iff,
simp only [exists_prop],
split,
{ have := prod_mem_prod U'_nhd V'_nhd,
tauto },
{ intros p h',
simp only [set.mem_preimage_eq, set.prod_mk_mem_set_prod_eq] at h',
rcases p with ⟨⟨x, y⟩, ⟨x', y'⟩⟩,
apply h ; tauto } }
end
end dense_embedding
|
907f6f0999f9c0a3ddaf93b0c551f12036977f97 | 75bd9c50a345718d735a7533c007cf45f9da9a83 | /src/measure_theory/set_integral.lean | e74b3f283925064d1ebb0294e4419ec1a00bc33f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jtbarker/mathlib | a1a3b1ddc16179826260578410746756ef18032c | 392d3e376b44265ef2dedbd92231d3177acc1fd0 | refs/heads/master | 1,671,246,411,096 | 1,600,801,712,000 | 1,600,801,712,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 35,405 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import measure_theory.bochner_integration
import analysis.normed_space.indicator_function
/-!
# Set integral
In this file we prove some properties of `∫ x in s, f x ∂μ`. Recall that this notation
is defined as `∫ x, f x ∂(μ.restrict s)`. In `integral_indicator` we prove that for a measurable
function `f` and a measurable set `s` this definition coincides with another natural definition:
`∫ x, indicator s f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ`, where `indicator s f x` is equal to `f x` for `x ∈ s`
and is zero otherwise.
Since `∫ x in s, f x ∂μ` is a notation, one can rewrite or apply any theorem about `∫ x, f x ∂μ`
directly. In this file we prove some theorems about dependence of `∫ x in s, f x ∂μ` on `s`, e.g.
`integral_union`, `integral_empty`, `integral_univ`.
We also define `integrable_on f s μ := integrable f (μ.restrict s)` and prove theorems like
`integrable_on_union : integrable_on f (s ∪ t) μ ↔ integrable_on f s μ ∧ integrable_on f t μ`.
Next we define a predicate `integrable_at_filter (f : α → E) (l : filter α) (μ : measure α)`
saying that `f` is integrable at some set `s ∈ l` and prove that a measurable function is integrable
at `l` with respect to `μ` provided that `f` is bounded above at `l ⊓ μ.ae` and `μ` is finite
at `l`.
Finally, we prove a version of the
[Fundamental theorem of calculus](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_theorem_of_calculus)
for set integral, see `filter.tendsto.integral_sub_linear_is_o_ae` and its corollaries.
Namely, consider a measurably generated filter `l`, a measure `μ` finite at this filter, and
a function `f` that has a finite limit `c` at `l ⊓ μ.ae`. Then `∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = μ s • c + o(μ s)`
as `s` tends to `l.lift' powerset`, i.e. for any `ε>0` there exists `t ∈ l` such that
`∥∫ x in s, f x ∂μ - μ s • c∥ ≤ ε * μ s` whenever `s ⊆ t`. We also formulate a version of this
theorem for a locally finite measure `μ` and a function `f` continuous at a point `a`.
## Notation
`∫ a in s, f a` is `measure_theory.integral (s.indicator f)`
## TODO
The file ends with over a hundred lines of commented out code. This is the old contents of this file
using the `indicator` approach to the definition of `∫ x in s, f x ∂μ`. This code should be
migrated to the new definition.
-/
noncomputable theory
open set filter topological_space measure_theory function
open_locale classical topological_space interval big_operators filter
variables {α β E F : Type*} [measurable_space α]
section piecewise
variables {μ : measure α} {s : set α} {f g : α → β}
lemma piecewise_ae_eq_restrict (hs : is_measurable s) : piecewise s f g =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] f :=
begin
rw [ae_restrict_eq hs],
exact (piecewise_eq_on s f g).eventually_eq.filter_mono inf_le_right
end
lemma piecewise_ae_eq_restrict_compl (hs : is_measurable s) :
piecewise s f g =ᵐ[μ.restrict sᶜ] g :=
begin
rw [ae_restrict_eq hs.compl],
exact (piecewise_eq_on_compl s f g).eventually_eq.filter_mono inf_le_right
end
end piecewise
section indicator_function
variables [has_zero β] {μ : measure α} {s : set α} {f : α → β}
lemma indicator_ae_eq_restrict (hs : is_measurable s) : indicator s f =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] f :=
piecewise_ae_eq_restrict hs
lemma indicator_ae_eq_restrict_compl (hs : is_measurable s) : indicator s f =ᵐ[μ.restrict sᶜ] 0 :=
piecewise_ae_eq_restrict_compl hs
end indicator_function
namespace measure_theory
section normed_group
lemma has_finite_integral_restrict_of_bounded [normed_group E] {f : α → E} {s : set α}
{μ : measure α} {C} (hs : μ s < ⊤) (hf : ∀ᵐ x ∂(μ.restrict s), ∥f x∥ ≤ C) :
has_finite_integral f (μ.restrict s) :=
by haveI : finite_measure (μ.restrict s) := ⟨by rwa [measure.restrict_apply_univ]⟩;
exact has_finite_integral_of_bounded hf
variables [normed_group E] [measurable_space E] {f : α → E} {s t : set α} {μ ν : measure α}
/-- A function is `integrable_on` a set `s` if it is a measurable function and if the integral of
its pointwise norm over `s` is less than infinity. -/
def integrable_on (f : α → E) (s : set α) (μ : measure α . volume_tac) : Prop :=
integrable f (μ.restrict s)
lemma integrable_on.integrable (h : integrable_on f s μ) :
integrable f (μ.restrict s) :=
h
@[simp] lemma integrable_on_empty (hf : measurable f) : integrable_on f ∅ μ :=
by simp [integrable_on, measurable.integrable_zero hf]
@[simp] lemma integrable_on_univ : integrable_on f univ μ ↔ integrable f μ :=
by rw [integrable_on, measure.restrict_univ]
lemma integrable_on_zero : integrable_on (λ _, (0:E)) s μ := integrable_zero _ _ _
lemma integrable_on_const {C : E} : integrable_on (λ _, C) s μ ↔ C = 0 ∨ μ s < ⊤ :=
integrable_const_iff.trans $ by rw [measure.restrict_apply_univ]
lemma integrable_on.mono (h : integrable_on f t ν) (hs : s ⊆ t) (hμ : μ ≤ ν) :
integrable_on f s μ :=
h.mono_measure $ measure.restrict_mono hs hμ
lemma integrable_on.mono_set (h : integrable_on f t μ) (hst : s ⊆ t) :
integrable_on f s μ :=
h.mono hst (le_refl _)
lemma integrable_on.mono_measure (h : integrable_on f s ν) (hμ : μ ≤ ν) :
integrable_on f s μ :=
h.mono (subset.refl _) hμ
lemma integrable_on.mono_set_ae (h : integrable_on f t μ) (hst : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) :
integrable_on f s μ :=
h.integrable.mono_measure $ restrict_mono_ae hst
lemma integrable.integrable_on (h : integrable f μ) : integrable_on f s μ :=
h.mono_measure $ measure.restrict_le_self
lemma integrable.integrable_on' (h : integrable f (μ.restrict s)) : integrable_on f s μ :=
h
lemma integrable_on.left_of_union (h : integrable_on f (s ∪ t) μ) : integrable_on f s μ :=
h.mono_set $ subset_union_left _ _
lemma integrable_on.right_of_union (h : integrable_on f (s ∪ t) μ) : integrable_on f t μ :=
h.mono_set $ subset_union_right _ _
lemma integrable_on.union (hs : integrable_on f s μ) (ht : integrable_on f t μ) :
integrable_on f (s ∪ t) μ :=
(hs.add_measure ht).mono_measure $ measure.restrict_union_le _ _
@[simp] lemma integrable_on_union :
integrable_on f (s ∪ t) μ ↔ integrable_on f s μ ∧ integrable_on f t μ :=
⟨λ h, ⟨h.left_of_union, h.right_of_union⟩, λ h, h.1.union h.2⟩
@[simp] lemma integrable_on_finite_union (hf : measurable f) {s : set β} (hs : finite s)
{t : β → set α} : integrable_on f (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) μ ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, integrable_on f (t i) μ :=
begin
apply hs.induction_on,
{ simp [hf] },
{ intros a s ha hs hf, simp [hf, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib] }
end
@[simp] lemma integrable_on_finset_union (hf : measurable f) {s : finset β} {t : β → set α} :
integrable_on f (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) μ ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, integrable_on f (t i) μ :=
integrable_on_finite_union hf s.finite_to_set
lemma integrable_on.add_measure (hμ : integrable_on f s μ) (hν : integrable_on f s ν) :
integrable_on f s (μ + ν) :=
by { delta integrable_on, rw measure.restrict_add, exact hμ.integrable.add_measure hν }
@[simp] lemma integrable_on_add_measure :
integrable_on f s (μ + ν) ↔ integrable_on f s μ ∧ integrable_on f s ν :=
⟨λ h, ⟨h.mono_measure (measure.le_add_right (le_refl _)),
h.mono_measure (measure.le_add_left (le_refl _))⟩,
λ h, h.1.add_measure h.2⟩
lemma integrable_indicator_iff (hf : measurable f) (hs : is_measurable s) :
integrable (indicator s f) μ ↔ integrable_on f s μ :=
by simp only [integrable_on, integrable, has_finite_integral, nnnorm_indicator_eq_indicator_nnnorm,
ennreal.coe_indicator, lintegral_indicator _ hs, hf, hf.indicator hs]
lemma integrable_on.indicator (h : integrable_on f s μ) (hs : is_measurable s) :
integrable (indicator s f) μ :=
(integrable_indicator_iff h.measurable hs).2 h
/-- We say that a function `f` is *integrable at filter* `l` if it is integrable on some
set `s ∈ l`. Equivalently, it is eventually integrable on `s` in `l.lift' powerset`. -/
def integrable_at_filter (f : α → E) (l : filter α) (μ : measure α . volume_tac) :=
∃ s ∈ l, integrable_on f s μ
variables {l l' : filter α}
protected lemma integrable_at_filter.eventually (h : integrable_at_filter f l μ) :
∀ᶠ s in l.lift' powerset, integrable_on f s μ :=
by { refine (eventually_lift'_powerset' $ λ s t hst ht, _).2 h, exact ht.mono_set hst }
lemma integrable_at_filter.filter_mono (hl : l ≤ l') (hl' : integrable_at_filter f l' μ) :
integrable_at_filter f l μ :=
let ⟨s, hs, hsf⟩ := hl' in ⟨s, hl hs, hsf⟩
lemma integrable_at_filter.inf_of_left (hl : integrable_at_filter f l μ) :
integrable_at_filter f (l ⊓ l') μ :=
hl.filter_mono inf_le_left
lemma integrable_at_filter.inf_of_right (hl : integrable_at_filter f l μ) :
integrable_at_filter f (l' ⊓ l) μ :=
hl.filter_mono inf_le_right
@[simp] lemma integrable_at_filter.inf_ae_iff {l : filter α} :
integrable_at_filter f (l ⊓ μ.ae) μ ↔ integrable_at_filter f l μ :=
begin
refine ⟨_, λ h, h.filter_mono inf_le_left⟩,
rintros ⟨s, ⟨t, ht, u, hu, hs⟩, hf⟩,
refine ⟨t, ht, _⟩,
refine hf.integrable.mono_measure (λ v hv, _),
simp only [measure.restrict_apply hv],
refine measure_mono_ae (mem_sets_of_superset hu $ λ x hx, _),
exact λ ⟨hv, ht⟩, ⟨hv, hs ⟨ht, hx⟩⟩
end
alias integrable_at_filter.inf_ae_iff ↔ measure_theory.integrable_at_filter.of_inf_ae _
/-- If `μ` is a measure finite at filter `l` and `f` is a function such that its norm is bounded
above at `l`, then `f` is integrable at `l`. -/
lemma measure.finite_at_filter.integrable_at_filter (hfm : measurable f)
{l : filter α} [is_measurably_generated l]
(hμ : μ.finite_at_filter l) (hf : l.is_bounded_under (≤) (norm ∘ f)) :
integrable_at_filter f l μ :=
begin
rcases hμ with ⟨s, hsl, hsμ⟩,
rcases hf with ⟨C, hC⟩,
simp only [eventually_map] at hC,
rcases hC.exists_measurable_mem with ⟨t, htl, htm, hC⟩,
refine ⟨t ∩ s, inter_mem_sets htl hsl, _⟩,
refine ⟨hfm, has_finite_integral_restrict_of_bounded
(lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono $ inter_subset_right _ _) hsμ) _⟩,
exact C,
suffices : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, ∥f x∥ ≤ C,
from ae_mono (measure.restrict_mono (inter_subset_left _ _) (le_refl _)) this,
rw [ae_restrict_eq htm, eventually_inf_principal],
exact eventually_of_forall hC
end
lemma measure.finite_at_filter.integrable_at_filter_of_tendsto_ae (hfm : measurable f)
{l : filter α} [is_measurably_generated l] (hμ : μ.finite_at_filter l) {b}
(hf : tendsto f (l ⊓ μ.ae) (𝓝 b)) :
integrable_at_filter f l μ :=
(hμ.inf_of_left.integrable_at_filter hfm hf.norm.is_bounded_under_le).of_inf_ae
alias measure.finite_at_filter.integrable_at_filter_of_tendsto_ae ←
filter.tendsto.integrable_at_filter_ae
lemma measure.finite_at_filter.integrable_at_filter_of_tendsto (hfm : measurable f)
{l : filter α} [is_measurably_generated l] (hμ : μ.finite_at_filter l) {b}
(hf : tendsto f l (𝓝 b)) :
integrable_at_filter f l μ :=
hμ.integrable_at_filter hfm hf.norm.is_bounded_under_le
alias measure.finite_at_filter.integrable_at_filter_of_tendsto ← filter.tendsto.integrable_at_filter
variables [borel_space E] [second_countable_topology E]
lemma integrable_add [opens_measurable_space E] {f g : α → E}
(h : univ ⊆ f ⁻¹' {0} ∪ g ⁻¹' {0}) (hf : measurable f) (hg : measurable g) :
integrable (f + g) μ ↔ integrable f μ ∧ integrable g μ :=
begin
refine ⟨λ hfg, _, λ h, h.1.add h.2⟩,
rw [← indicator_add_eq_left h],
conv { congr, skip, rw [← indicator_add_eq_right h] },
rw [integrable_indicator_iff _ (hf (is_measurable_singleton 0)).compl],
rw [integrable_indicator_iff _ (hg (is_measurable_singleton 0)).compl],
exact ⟨hfg.integrable_on, hfg.integrable_on⟩, exact hf.add hg, exact hf.add hg
end
/-- To prove something for an arbitrary measurable + integrable function in a second countable
Borel normed group, it suffices to show that
* the property holds for (multiples of) characteristic functions;
* is closed under addition;
* the set of functions in the `L¹` space for which the property holds is closed.
* the property is closed under the almost-everywhere equal relation.
It is possible to make the hypotheses in the induction steps a bit stronger, and such conditions
can be added once we need them (for example in `h_sum` it is only necessary to consider the sum of
a simple function with a multiple of a characteristic function and that the intersection
of their images is a subset of `{0}`).
-/
@[elab_as_eliminator]
lemma integrable.induction (P : (α → E) → Prop)
(h_ind : ∀ (c : E) ⦃s⦄, is_measurable s → μ s < ⊤ → P (s.indicator (λ _, c)))
(h_sum : ∀ ⦃f g : α → E⦄, set.univ ⊆ f ⁻¹' {0} ∪ g ⁻¹' {0} → integrable f μ → integrable g μ →
P f → P g → P (f + g))
(h_closed : is_closed {f : α →₁[μ] E | P f} )
(h_ae : ∀ ⦃f g⦄, f =ᵐ[μ] g → integrable f μ → measurable g → P f → P g) :
∀ ⦃f : α → E⦄ (hf : integrable f μ), P f :=
begin
have : ∀ (f : simple_func α E), integrable f μ → P f,
{ refine simple_func.induction _ _,
{ intros c s hs h, dsimp only [simple_func.coe_const, simple_func.const_zero,
piecewise_eq_indicator, simple_func.coe_zero, simple_func.coe_piecewise] at h ⊢,
by_cases hc : c = 0,
{ subst hc, convert h_ind 0 is_measurable.empty (by simp) using 1, simp [const] },
apply h_ind c hs,
have : (nnnorm c : ennreal) * μ s < ⊤,
{ have := @comp_indicator _ _ _ _ (λ x : E, (nnnorm x : ennreal)) (const α c) s,
dsimp only at this,
have h' := h.has_finite_integral,
simpa [has_finite_integral, this, lintegral_indicator, hs] using h' },
exact ennreal.lt_top_of_mul_lt_top_right this (by simp [hc]) },
{ intros f g hfg hf hg int_fg,
rw [simple_func.coe_add, integrable_add hfg f.measurable g.measurable] at int_fg,
refine h_sum hfg int_fg.1 int_fg.2 (hf int_fg.1) (hg int_fg.2) } },
have : ∀ (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E), P f,
{ intro f, exact h_ae f.to_simple_func_eq_to_fun f.integrable (l1.measurable _)
(this f.to_simple_func f.integrable) },
have : ∀ (f : α →₁[μ] E), P f :=
λ f, l1.simple_func.dense_range.induction_on f h_closed this,
exact λ f hf, h_ae (l1.to_fun_of_fun f hf) (l1.integrable _) hf.measurable (this (l1.of_fun f hf))
end
variables [complete_space E] [normed_space ℝ E]
lemma integral_union (hst : disjoint s t) (hs : is_measurable s) (ht : is_measurable t)
(hfs : integrable_on f s μ) (hft : integrable_on f t μ) :
∫ x in s ∪ t, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ + ∫ x in t, f x ∂μ :=
by simp only [integrable_on, measure.restrict_union hst hs ht, integral_add_measure hfs hft]
lemma integral_empty : ∫ x in ∅, f x ∂μ = 0 := by rw [measure.restrict_empty, integral_zero_measure]
lemma integral_univ : ∫ x in univ, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by rw [measure.restrict_univ]
lemma integral_add_compl (hs : is_measurable s) (hfi : integrable f μ) :
∫ x in s, f x ∂μ + ∫ x in sᶜ, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ :=
by rw [← integral_union (disjoint_compl_right s) hs hs.compl hfi.integrable_on hfi.integrable_on,
union_compl_self, integral_univ]
/-- For a measurable function `f` and a measurable set `s`, the integral of `indicator s f`
over the whole space is equal to `∫ x in s, f x ∂μ` defined as `∫ x, f x ∂(μ.restrict s)`. -/
lemma integral_indicator (hfm : measurable f) (hs : is_measurable s) :
∫ x, indicator s f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ :=
have hfms : measurable (indicator s f) := hfm.indicator hs,
if hfi : integrable_on f s μ then
calc ∫ x, indicator s f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, indicator s f x ∂μ + ∫ x in sᶜ, indicator s f x ∂μ :
(integral_add_compl hs (hfi.indicator hs)).symm
... = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ + ∫ x in sᶜ, 0 ∂μ :
congr_arg2 (+) (integral_congr_ae hfms hfm (indicator_ae_eq_restrict hs))
(integral_congr_ae hfms measurable_const (indicator_ae_eq_restrict_compl hs))
... = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ : by simp
else
by { rwa [integral_undef, integral_undef], rwa integrable_indicator_iff hfm hs }
lemma set_integral_const (c : E) : ∫ x in s, c ∂μ = (μ s).to_real • c :=
by rw [integral_const, measure.restrict_apply_univ]
@[simp]
lemma integral_indicator_const (e : E) ⦃s : set α⦄ (s_meas : is_measurable s) :
∫ (a : α), s.indicator (λ (x : α), e) a ∂μ = (μ s).to_real • e :=
by rw [integral_indicator measurable_const s_meas, ← set_integral_const]
lemma set_integral_map {β} [measurable_space β] {g : α → β} {f : β → E} {s : set β}
(hs : is_measurable s) (hf : measurable f) (hg : measurable g) :
∫ y in s, f y ∂(measure.map g μ) = ∫ x in g ⁻¹' s, f (g x) ∂μ :=
by rw [measure.restrict_map hg hs, integral_map_measure hg hf]
lemma norm_set_integral_le_of_norm_le_const_ae {C : ℝ} (hs : μ s < ⊤)
(hC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, ∥f x∥ ≤ C) :
∥∫ x in s, f x ∂μ∥ ≤ C * (μ s).to_real :=
begin
rw ← measure.restrict_apply_univ at *,
haveI : finite_measure (μ.restrict s) := ⟨‹_›⟩,
exact norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const hC
end
lemma norm_set_integral_le_of_norm_le_const_ae' {C : ℝ} (hs : μ s < ⊤)
(hC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → ∥f x∥ ≤ C) (hfm : measurable f) :
∥∫ x in s, f x ∂μ∥ ≤ C * (μ s).to_real :=
norm_set_integral_le_of_norm_le_const_ae hs $ (ae_restrict_iff $ hfm.norm is_measurable_Iic).2 hC
lemma norm_set_integral_le_of_norm_le_const_ae'' {C : ℝ} (hs : μ s < ⊤) (hsm : is_measurable s)
(hC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → ∥f x∥ ≤ C) :
∥∫ x in s, f x ∂μ∥ ≤ C * (μ s).to_real :=
norm_set_integral_le_of_norm_le_const_ae hs $ by rwa [ae_restrict_eq hsm, eventually_inf_principal]
lemma norm_set_integral_le_of_norm_le_const {C : ℝ} (hs : μ s < ⊤)
(hC : ∀ x ∈ s, ∥f x∥ ≤ C) (hfm : measurable f) :
∥∫ x in s, f x ∂μ∥ ≤ C * (μ s).to_real :=
norm_set_integral_le_of_norm_le_const_ae' hs (eventually_of_forall hC) hfm
lemma norm_set_integral_le_of_norm_le_const' {C : ℝ} (hs : μ s < ⊤) (hsm : is_measurable s)
(hC : ∀ x ∈ s, ∥f x∥ ≤ C) :
∥∫ x in s, f x ∂μ∥ ≤ C * (μ s).to_real :=
norm_set_integral_le_of_norm_le_const_ae'' hs hsm $ eventually_of_forall hC
end normed_group
end measure_theory
open measure_theory asymptotics metric
variables [measurable_space E] [normed_group E]
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus for set integrals: if `μ` is a measure that is finite
at a filter `l` and `f` is a measurable function that has a finite limit `b` at `l ⊓ μ.ae`,
then `∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = μ s • b + o(μ s)` as `s` tends to `l.lift' powerset`. Since `μ s` is
an `ennreal` number, we use `(μ s).to_real` in the actual statement. -/
lemma filter.tendsto.integral_sub_linear_is_o_ae
[normed_space ℝ E] [second_countable_topology E] [complete_space E] [borel_space E]
{μ : measure α} {l : filter α} [l.is_measurably_generated]
{f : α → E} {b : E} (h : tendsto f (l ⊓ μ.ae) (𝓝 b)) (hfm : measurable f)
(hμ : μ.finite_at_filter l) :
is_o (λ s : set α, ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ - (μ s).to_real • b) (λ s, (μ s).to_real)
(l.lift' powerset) :=
begin
simp only [is_o_iff],
intros ε ε₀,
have : ∀ᶠ s in l.lift' powerset, ∀ᶠ x in μ.ae, x ∈ s → f x ∈ closed_ball b ε :=
eventually_lift'_powerset_eventually.2 (h.eventually $ closed_ball_mem_nhds _ ε₀),
refine hμ.eventually.mp ((h.integrable_at_filter_ae hfm hμ).eventually.mp (this.mono _)),
simp only [mem_closed_ball, dist_eq_norm],
intros s h_norm h_integrable hμs,
rw [← set_integral_const, ← integral_sub h_integrable (integrable_on_const.2 $ or.inr hμs),
real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg ennreal.to_real_nonneg],
exact norm_set_integral_le_of_norm_le_const_ae' hμs h_norm (hfm.sub measurable_const)
end
/-- If a function is integrable at `𝓝[s] x` for each point `x` of a compact set `s`, then it is
integrable on `s`. -/
lemma is_compact.integrable_on_of_nhds_within [topological_space α] {μ : measure α} {s : set α}
(hs : is_compact s) {f : α → E} (hfm : measurable f)
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, integrable_at_filter f (𝓝[s] x) μ) :
integrable_on f s μ :=
is_compact.induction_on hs (integrable_on_empty hfm) (λ s t hst ht, ht.mono_set hst)
(λ s t hs ht, hs.union ht) hf
/-- A function `f` continuous on a compact set `s` is integrable on this set with respect to any
locally finite measure. -/
lemma continuous_on.integrable_on_compact [topological_space α] [opens_measurable_space α]
[t2_space α] {μ : measure α} [locally_finite_measure μ]
{s : set α} (hs : is_compact s)
{f : α → E} (hfm : measurable f) (hf : continuous_on f s) :
integrable_on f s μ :=
hs.integrable_on_of_nhds_within hfm $ λ x hx,
by haveI := hs.is_measurable.nhds_within_is_measurably_generated;
exact (hf x hx).integrable_at_filter hfm (μ.finite_at_nhds_within _ _)
/-- A continuous function `f` is integrable on any compact set with respect to any locally finite
measure. -/
lemma continuous.integrable_on_compact
[topological_space α] [opens_measurable_space α] [t2_space α]
[borel_space E] {μ : measure α} [locally_finite_measure μ] {s : set α}
(hs : is_compact s) {f : α → E} (hf : continuous f) :
integrable_on f s μ :=
hf.continuous_on.integrable_on_compact hs hf.measurable
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus for set integrals, `nhds` version: if `μ` is a locally finite
measure that and `f` is a measurable function that is continuous at a point `a`,
then `∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = μ s • f a + o(μ s)` as `s` tends to `(𝓝 a).lift' powerset`.
Since `μ s` is an `ennreal` number, we use `(μ s).to_real` in the actual statement. -/
lemma continuous_at.integral_sub_linear_is_o_ae
[topological_space α] [opens_measurable_space α]
[normed_space ℝ E] [second_countable_topology E] [complete_space E]
[borel_space E]
{μ : measure α} [locally_finite_measure μ] {a : α}
{f : α → E} (ha : continuous_at f a) (hfm : measurable f) :
is_o (λ s, ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ - (μ s).to_real • f a) (λ s, (μ s).to_real) ((𝓝 a).lift' powerset) :=
(ha.mono_left inf_le_left).integral_sub_linear_is_o_ae hfm (μ.finite_at_nhds a)
section
/-! ### Continuous linear maps composed with integration
The goal of this section is to prove that integration commutes with continuous linear maps.
The first step is to prove that, given a function `φ : α → E` which is measurable and integrable,
and a continuous linear map `L : E →L[ℝ] F`, the function `λ a, L(φ a)` is also measurable
and integrable. Note we cannot write this as `L ∘ φ` since the type of `L` is not an actual
function type.
The next step is translate this to `l1`, replacing the function `φ` by a term with type
`α →₁[μ] E` (an equivalence class of integrable functions).
The corresponding "composition" is `L.comp_l1 φ : α →₁[μ] F`. This is then upgraded to
a linear map `L.comp_l1ₗ : (α →₁[μ] E) →ₗ[ℝ] (α →₁[μ] F)` and a continuous linear map
`L.comp_l1L : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] (α →₁[μ] F)`.
Then we can prove the commutation result using continuity of all relevant operations
and the result on simple functions.
-/
variables {μ : measure α} [normed_space ℝ E]
variables [normed_group F] [normed_space ℝ F]
namespace continuous_linear_map
lemma norm_comp_l1_apply_le [opens_measurable_space E] [second_countable_topology E] (φ : α →₁[μ] E)
(L : E →L[ℝ] F) : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∥L (φ a)∥ ≤ ∥L∥ * ∥φ a∥ :=
eventually_of_forall (λ a, L.le_op_norm (φ a))
variables [measurable_space F] [borel_space F]
lemma integrable_comp [opens_measurable_space E] {φ : α → E} (L : E →L[ℝ] F)
(φ_int : integrable φ μ) : integrable (λ (a : α), L (φ a)) μ :=
((integrable.norm φ_int).const_mul ∥L∥).mono' (L.measurable.comp φ_int.measurable)
(eventually_of_forall $ λ a, L.le_op_norm (φ a))
variables [borel_space E] [second_countable_topology E]
/-- Composing `φ : α →₁[μ] E` with `L : E →L[ℝ] F`. -/
def comp_l1 [second_countable_topology F] (L : E →L[ℝ] F) (φ : α →₁[μ] E) : α →₁[μ] F :=
l1.of_fun (λ a, L (φ a)) (L.integrable_comp φ.integrable)
lemma comp_l1_apply [second_countable_topology F] (L : E →L[ℝ] F) (φ : α →₁[μ] E) :
∀ᵐ a ∂μ, (L.comp_l1 φ) a = L (φ a) :=
l1.to_fun_of_fun _ _
lemma integrable_comp_l1 (L : E →L[ℝ] F) (φ : α →₁[μ] E) : integrable (λ a, L (φ a)) μ :=
L.integrable_comp φ.integrable
lemma measurable_comp_l1 (L : E →L[ℝ] F) (φ : α →₁[μ] E) :
measurable (λ a, L (φ a)) := L.measurable.comp φ.measurable
variables [second_countable_topology F]
lemma integral_comp_l1 [complete_space F] (L : E →L[ℝ] F) (φ : α →₁[μ] E) :
∫ a, (L.comp_l1 φ) a ∂μ = ∫ a, L (φ a) ∂μ :=
by simp [comp_l1]
/-- Composing `φ : α →₁[μ] E` with `L : E →L[ℝ] F`, seen as a `ℝ`-linear map on `α →₁[μ] E`. -/
def comp_l1ₗ (L : E →L[ℝ] F) : (α →₁[μ] E) →ₗ[ℝ] (α →₁[μ] F) :=
{ to_fun := λ φ, L.comp_l1 φ,
map_add' := begin
intros f g,
dsimp [comp_l1],
rw [← l1.of_fun_add, l1.of_fun_eq_of_fun],
apply (l1.add_to_fun f g).mono,
intros a ha,
simp only [ha, pi.add_apply, L.map_add]
end,
map_smul' := begin
intros c f,
dsimp [comp_l1],
rw [← l1.of_fun_smul, l1.of_fun_eq_of_fun],
apply (l1.smul_to_fun c f).mono,
intros a ha,
simp only [ha, pi.smul_apply, continuous_linear_map.map_smul]
end }
lemma norm_comp_l1_le (φ : α →₁[μ] E) (L : E →L[ℝ] F) : ∥L.comp_l1 φ∥ ≤ ∥L∥*∥φ∥ :=
begin
erw l1.norm_of_fun_eq_integral_norm,
calc
∫ a, ∥L (φ a)∥ ∂μ ≤ ∫ a, ∥L∥ *∥φ a∥ ∂μ : integral_mono (L.integrable_comp_l1 φ).norm
(φ.integrable_norm.const_mul $ ∥L∥) (L.norm_comp_l1_apply_le φ)
... = ∥L∥ * ∥φ∥ : by rw [integral_mul_left, φ.norm_eq_integral_norm]
end
/-- Composing `φ : α →₁[μ] E` with `L : E →L[ℝ] F`, seen as a continuous `ℝ`-linear map on
`α →₁[μ] E`. -/
def comp_l1L (L : E →L[ℝ] F) : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] (α →₁[μ] F) :=
linear_map.mk_continuous L.comp_l1ₗ (∥L∥) (λ φ, L.norm_comp_l1_le φ)
lemma norm_compl1L_le (L : E →L[ℝ] F) : ∥(L.comp_l1L : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] (α →₁[μ] F))∥ ≤ ∥L∥ :=
op_norm_le_bound _ (norm_nonneg _) (λ φ, L.norm_comp_l1_le φ)
variables [complete_space F]
lemma continuous_integral_comp_l1 (L : E →L[ℝ] F) :
continuous (λ (φ : α →₁[μ] E), ∫ (a : α), L (φ a) ∂μ) :=
begin
rw ← funext L.integral_comp_l1,
exact continuous_integral.comp L.comp_l1L.continuous
end
variables [complete_space E]
lemma integral_comp_comm (L : E →L[ℝ] F) {φ : α → E} (φ_int : integrable φ μ) :
∫ a, L (φ a) ∂μ = L (∫ a, φ a ∂μ) :=
begin
apply integrable.induction (λ φ, ∫ a, L (φ a) ∂μ = L (∫ a, φ a ∂μ)),
{ intros e s s_meas s_finite,
rw [integral_indicator_const e s_meas, continuous_linear_map.map_smul,
← integral_indicator_const (L e) s_meas],
congr' 1 with a,
rw set.indicator_comp_of_zero L.map_zero },
{ intros f g H f_int g_int hf hg,
simp [L.map_add, integral_add f_int g_int,
integral_add (L.integrable_comp f_int) (L.integrable_comp g_int), hf, hg] },
{ exact is_closed_eq L.continuous_integral_comp_l1 (L.continuous.comp continuous_integral) },
{ intros f g hfg f_int g_meas hf,
convert hf using 1 ; clear hf,
{ exact integral_congr_ae (L.measurable.comp g_meas) (L.measurable.comp f_int.measurable)
(hfg.fun_comp L).symm },
{ rw integral_congr_ae g_meas f_int.measurable hfg.symm } },
all_goals { assumption }
end
lemma integral_comp_l1_comm (L : E →L[ℝ] F) (φ : α →₁[μ] E) : ∫ a, L (φ a) ∂μ = L (∫ a, φ a ∂μ) :=
L.integral_comp_comm φ.integrable
end continuous_linear_map
end
/-
namespace integrable
variables [measurable_space α] [measurable_space β] [normed_group E]
protected lemma measure_mono
end integrable
end measure_theory
section integral_on
variables [measurable_space α]
[normed_group β] [second_countable_topology β] [normed_space ℝ β] [complete_space β]
[measurable_space β] [borel_space β]
{s t : set α} {f g : α → β} {μ : measure α}
open set
lemma integral_on_congr (hf : measurable f) (hg : measurable g) (hs : is_measurable s)
(h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, a ∈ s → f a = g a) : ∫ a in s, f a ∂μ = ∫ a in s, g a ∂μ :=
integral_congr_ae hf hg $ _
lemma integral_on_congr_of_set (hsm : measurable_on s f) (htm : measurable_on t f)
(h : ∀ᵐ a, a ∈ s ↔ a ∈ t) : (∫ a in s, f a) = (∫ a in t, f a) :=
integral_congr_ae hsm htm $ indicator_congr_of_set h
lemma integral_on_add {s : set α} (hfm : measurable_on s f) (hfi : integrable_on s f) (hgm : measurable_on s g)
(hgi : integrable_on s g) : (∫ a in s, f a + g a) = (∫ a in s, f a) + (∫ a in s, g a) :=
by { simp only [indicator_add], exact integral_add hfm hfi hgm hgi }
lemma integral_on_sub (hfm : measurable_on s f) (hfi : integrable_on s f) (hgm : measurable_on s g)
(hgi : integrable_on s g) : (∫ a in s, f a - g a) = (∫ a in s, f a) - (∫ a in s, g a) :=
by { simp only [indicator_sub], exact integral_sub hfm hfi hgm hgi }
lemma integral_on_le_integral_on_ae {f g : α → ℝ} (hfm : measurable_on s f) (hfi : integrable_on s f)
(hgm : measurable_on s g) (hgi : integrable_on s g) (h : ∀ᵐ a, a ∈ s → f a ≤ g a) :
(∫ a in s, f a) ≤ (∫ a in s, g a) :=
begin
apply integral_le_integral_ae hfm hfi hgm hgi,
apply indicator_le_indicator_ae,
exact h
end
lemma integral_on_le_integral_on {f g : α → ℝ} (hfm : measurable_on s f) (hfi : integrable_on s f)
(hgm : measurable_on s g) (hgi : integrable_on s g) (h : ∀ a, a ∈ s → f a ≤ g a) :
(∫ a in s, f a) ≤ (∫ a in s, g a) :=
integral_on_le_integral_on_ae hfm hfi hgm hgi $ by filter_upwards [] h
lemma integral_on_union (hsm : measurable_on s f) (hsi : integrable_on s f)
(htm : measurable_on t f) (hti : integrable_on t f) (h : disjoint s t) :
(∫ a in (s ∪ t), f a) = (∫ a in s, f a) + (∫ a in t, f a) :=
by { rw [indicator_union_of_disjoint h, integral_add hsm hsi htm hti] }
lemma integral_on_union_ae (hs : is_measurable s) (ht : is_measurable t) (hsm : measurable_on s f)
(hsi : integrable_on s f) (htm : measurable_on t f) (hti : integrable_on t f) (h : ∀ᵐ a, a ∉ s ∩ t) :
(∫ a in (s ∪ t), f a) = (∫ a in s, f a) + (∫ a in t, f a) :=
begin
have := integral_congr_ae _ _ (indicator_union_ae h f),
rw [this, integral_add hsm hsi htm hti],
{ exact hsm.union hs ht htm },
{ exact measurable.add hsm htm }
end
lemma integral_on_nonneg_of_ae {f : α → ℝ} (hf : ∀ᵐ a, a ∈ s → 0 ≤ f a) : (0:ℝ) ≤ (∫ a in s, f a) :=
integral_nonneg_of_ae $ by { filter_upwards [hf] λ a h, indicator_nonneg' h }
lemma integral_on_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (hf : ∀ a, a ∈ s → 0 ≤ f a) : (0:ℝ) ≤ (∫ a in s, f a) :=
integral_on_nonneg_of_ae $ univ_mem_sets' hf
lemma integral_on_nonpos_of_ae {f : α → ℝ} (hf : ∀ᵐ a, a ∈ s → f a ≤ 0) : (∫ a in s, f a) ≤ 0 :=
integral_nonpos_of_nonpos_ae $ by { filter_upwards [hf] λ a h, indicator_nonpos' h }
lemma integral_on_nonpos {f : α → ℝ} (hf : ∀ a, a ∈ s → f a ≤ 0) : (∫ a in s, f a) ≤ 0 :=
integral_on_nonpos_of_ae $ univ_mem_sets' hf
lemma tendsto_integral_on_of_monotone {s : ℕ → set α} {f : α → β} (hsm : ∀i, is_measurable (s i))
(h_mono : monotone s) (hfm : measurable_on (Union s) f) (hfi : integrable_on (Union s) f) :
tendsto (λi, ∫ a in (s i), f a) at_top (nhds (∫ a in (Union s), f a)) :=
let bound : α → ℝ := indicator (Union s) (λa, ∥f a∥) in
begin
apply tendsto_integral_of_dominated_convergence,
{ assume i, exact hfm.subset (hsm i) (subset_Union _ _) },
{ assumption },
{ show integrable_on (Union s) (λa, ∥f a∥), rwa integrable_on_norm_iff },
{ assume i, apply ae_of_all,
assume a,
rw [norm_indicator_eq_indicator_norm],
exact indicator_le_indicator_of_subset (subset_Union _ _) (λa, norm_nonneg _) _ },
{ filter_upwards [] λa, le_trans (tendsto_indicator_of_monotone _ h_mono _ _) (pure_le_nhds _) }
end
lemma tendsto_integral_on_of_antimono (s : ℕ → set α) (f : α → β) (hsm : ∀i, is_measurable (s i))
(h_mono : ∀i j, i ≤ j → s j ⊆ s i) (hfm : measurable_on (s 0) f) (hfi : integrable_on (s 0) f) :
tendsto (λi, ∫ a in (s i), f a) at_top (nhds (∫ a in (Inter s), f a)) :=
let bound : α → ℝ := indicator (s 0) (λa, ∥f a∥) in
begin
apply tendsto_integral_of_dominated_convergence,
{ assume i, refine hfm.subset (hsm i) (h_mono _ _ (zero_le _)) },
{ exact hfm.subset (is_measurable.Inter hsm) (Inter_subset _ _) },
{ show integrable_on (s 0) (λa, ∥f a∥), rwa integrable_on_norm_iff },
{ assume i, apply ae_of_all,
assume a,
rw [norm_indicator_eq_indicator_norm],
refine indicator_le_indicator_of_subset (h_mono _ _ (zero_le _)) (λa, norm_nonneg _) _ },
{ filter_upwards [] λa, le_trans (tendsto_indicator_of_antimono _ h_mono _ _) (pure_le_nhds _) }
end
-- TODO : prove this for an encodable type
-- by proving an encodable version of `filter.is_countably_generated_at_top_finset_nat `
lemma integral_on_Union (s : ℕ → set α) (f : α → β) (hm : ∀i, is_measurable (s i))
(hd : ∀ i j, i ≠ j → s i ∩ s j = ∅) (hfm : measurable_on (Union s) f) (hfi : integrable_on (Union s) f) :
(∫ a in (Union s), f a) = ∑'i, ∫ a in s i, f a :=
suffices h : tendsto (λn:finset ℕ, ∑ i in n, ∫ a in s i, f a) at_top (𝓝 $ (∫ a in (Union s), f a)),
by { rwa has_sum.tsum_eq },
begin
have : (λn:finset ℕ, ∑ i in n, ∫ a in s i, f a) = λn:finset ℕ, ∫ a in (⋃i∈n, s i), f a,
{ funext,
rw [← integral_finset_sum, indicator_finset_bUnion],
{ assume i hi j hj hij, exact hd i j hij },
{ assume i, refine hfm.subset (hm _) (subset_Union _ _) },
{ assume i, refine hfi.subset (subset_Union _ _) } },
rw this,
refine tendsto_integral_filter_of_dominated_convergence _ _ _ _ _ _ _,
{ exact indicator (Union s) (λ a, ∥f a∥) },
{ exact is_countably_generated_at_top_finset_nat },
{ refine univ_mem_sets' (λ n, _),
simp only [mem_set_of_eq],
refine hfm.subset (is_measurable.Union (λ i, is_measurable.Union_Prop (λh, hm _)))
(bUnion_subset_Union _ _), },
{ assumption },
{ refine univ_mem_sets' (λ n, univ_mem_sets' $ _),
simp only [mem_set_of_eq],
assume a,
rw ← norm_indicator_eq_indicator_norm,
refine norm_indicator_le_of_subset (bUnion_subset_Union _ _) _ _ },
{ rw [← integrable_on, integrable_on_norm_iff], assumption },
{ filter_upwards [] λa, le_trans (tendsto_indicator_bUnion_finset _ _ _) (pure_le_nhds _) }
end
end integral_on
-/
|
016770fdf119e028d3c4bdfcaba61dfaa20537b4 | bb31430994044506fa42fd667e2d556327e18dfe | /src/data/nat/with_bot.lean | 713a12e2cc1f8e3e36b6146698a6d901e17fff66 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | sgouezel/mathlib | 0cb4e5335a2ba189fa7af96d83a377f83270e503 | 00638177efd1b2534fc5269363ebf42a7871df9a | refs/heads/master | 1,674,527,483,042 | 1,673,665,568,000 | 1,673,665,568,000 | 119,598,202 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,517,348,647,000 | 1,517,348,646,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,275 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import data.nat.order.basic
import algebra.order.monoid.with_top
/-!
# `with_bot ℕ`
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
Lemmas about the type of natural numbers with a bottom element adjoined.
-/
namespace nat
namespace with_bot
lemma add_eq_zero_iff {n m : with_bot ℕ} : n + m = 0 ↔ n = 0 ∧ m = 0 :=
begin
rcases ⟨n, m⟩ with ⟨_ | _, _ | _⟩,
any_goals { tautology },
repeat { erw [with_bot.coe_eq_coe] },
exact add_eq_zero_iff
end
lemma add_eq_one_iff {n m : with_bot ℕ} : n + m = 1 ↔ n = 0 ∧ m = 1 ∨ n = 1 ∧ m = 0 :=
begin
rcases ⟨n, m⟩ with ⟨_ | _, _ | _⟩,
any_goals { tautology },
repeat { erw [with_bot.coe_eq_coe] },
exact add_eq_one_iff
end
lemma add_eq_two_iff {n m : with_bot ℕ} :
n + m = 2 ↔ n = 0 ∧ m = 2 ∨ n = 1 ∧ m = 1 ∨ n = 2 ∧ m = 0 :=
begin
rcases ⟨n, m⟩ with ⟨_ | _, _ | _⟩,
any_goals { tautology },
repeat { erw [with_bot.coe_eq_coe] },
exact add_eq_two_iff
end
lemma add_eq_three_iff {n m : with_bot ℕ} :
n + m = 3 ↔ n = 0 ∧ m = 3 ∨ n = 1 ∧ m = 2 ∨ n = 2 ∧ m = 1 ∨ n = 3 ∧ m = 0 :=
begin
rcases ⟨n, m⟩ with ⟨_ | _, _ | _⟩,
any_goals { tautology },
repeat { erw [with_bot.coe_eq_coe] },
exact add_eq_three_iff
end
@[simp] lemma coe_nonneg {n : ℕ} : 0 ≤ (n : with_bot ℕ) :=
by { rw [← with_bot.coe_zero, with_bot.coe_le_coe], exact nat.zero_le _ }
@[simp] lemma lt_zero_iff (n : with_bot ℕ) : n < 0 ↔ n = ⊥ :=
option.cases_on n dec_trivial $ λ n, iff_of_false
(by simp [with_bot.some_eq_coe]) (λ h, option.no_confusion h)
lemma one_le_iff_zero_lt {x : with_bot ℕ} : 1 ≤ x ↔ 0 < x :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, lt_of_lt_of_le (with_bot.coe_lt_coe.mpr zero_lt_one) h, λ h, _⟩,
induction x using with_bot.rec_bot_coe,
{ exact (not_lt_bot h).elim },
{ exact with_bot.coe_le_coe.mpr (nat.succ_le_iff.mpr (with_bot.coe_lt_coe.mp h)) }
end
lemma lt_one_iff_le_zero {x : with_bot ℕ} : x < 1 ↔ x ≤ 0 :=
not_iff_not.mp (by simpa using one_le_iff_zero_lt)
end with_bot
end nat
|
77c6df0d98d92e98374c8fade741c3cd2fb755bd | a9d0fb7b0e4f802bd3857b803e6c5c23d87fef91 | /hott/types/fiber.hlean | 377c2ec179829de278ab12ff17f97a1dcecdba61 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean-osx | 4a954262c780e404c1369d6c06516161d07fcb40 | 3670278342d2f4faa49d95b46d86642d7875b47c | refs/heads/master | 1,611,410,334,552 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 12,043,103 | 5 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,195 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Floris van Doorn
Ported from Coq HoTT
Theorems about fibers
-/
import .sigma .eq .pi .pointed
open equiv sigma sigma.ops eq pi
structure fiber {A B : Type} (f : A → B) (b : B) :=
(point : A)
(point_eq : f point = b)
namespace fiber
variables {A B : Type} {f : A → B} {b : B}
protected definition sigma_char [constructor]
(f : A → B) (b : B) : fiber f b ≃ (Σ(a : A), f a = b) :=
begin
fapply equiv.MK,
{intro x, exact ⟨point x, point_eq x⟩},
{intro x, exact (fiber.mk x.1 x.2)},
{intro x, exact abstract begin cases x, apply idp end end},
{intro x, exact abstract begin cases x, apply idp end end},
end
definition fiber_eq_equiv (x y : fiber f b)
: (x = y) ≃ (Σ(p : point x = point y), point_eq x = ap f p ⬝ point_eq y) :=
begin
apply equiv.trans,
apply eq_equiv_fn_eq_of_equiv, apply fiber.sigma_char,
apply equiv.trans,
apply sigma_eq_equiv,
apply sigma_equiv_sigma_right,
intro p,
apply pathover_eq_equiv_Fl,
end
definition fiber_eq {x y : fiber f b} (p : point x = point y)
(q : point_eq x = ap f p ⬝ point_eq y) : x = y :=
to_inv !fiber_eq_equiv ⟨p, q⟩
open is_trunc
definition fiber_pr1 (B : A → Type) (a : A) : fiber (pr1 : (Σa, B a) → A) a ≃ B a :=
calc
fiber pr1 a ≃ Σu, u.1 = a : fiber.sigma_char
... ≃ Σa' (b : B a'), a' = a : sigma_assoc_equiv
... ≃ Σa' (p : a' = a), B a' : sigma_equiv_sigma_right (λa', !comm_equiv_nondep)
... ≃ Σu, B u.1 : sigma_assoc_equiv
... ≃ B a : !sigma_equiv_of_is_contr_left
definition sigma_fiber_equiv (f : A → B) : (Σb, fiber f b) ≃ A :=
calc
(Σb, fiber f b) ≃ Σb a, f a = b : sigma_equiv_sigma_right (λb, !fiber.sigma_char)
... ≃ Σa b, f a = b : sigma_comm_equiv
... ≃ A : sigma_equiv_of_is_contr_right
definition is_pointed_fiber [instance] [constructor] (f : A → B) (a : A)
: pointed (fiber f (f a)) :=
pointed.mk (fiber.mk a idp)
definition pointed_fiber [constructor] (f : A → B) (a : A) : Type* :=
pointed.Mk (fiber.mk a (idpath (f a)))
definition is_trunc_fun [reducible] (n : trunc_index) (f : A → B) :=
Π(b : B), is_trunc n (fiber f b)
definition is_contr_fun [reducible] (f : A → B) := is_trunc_fun -2 f
-- pre and post composition with equivalences
open function
protected definition equiv_postcompose {B' : Type} (g : B → B') [H : is_equiv g]
: fiber (g ∘ f) (g b) ≃ fiber f b :=
calc
fiber (g ∘ f) (g b) ≃ Σa : A, g (f a) = g b : fiber.sigma_char
... ≃ Σa : A, f a = b : begin
apply sigma_equiv_sigma_right, intro a,
apply equiv.symm, apply eq_equiv_fn_eq
end
... ≃ fiber f b : fiber.sigma_char
protected definition equiv_precompose {A' : Type} (g : A' → A) [H : is_equiv g]
: fiber (f ∘ g) b ≃ fiber f b :=
calc
fiber (f ∘ g) b ≃ Σa' : A', f (g a') = b : fiber.sigma_char
... ≃ Σa : A, f a = b : begin
apply sigma_equiv_sigma (equiv.mk g H),
intro a', apply erfl
end
... ≃ fiber f b : fiber.sigma_char
end fiber
open unit is_trunc pointed
namespace fiber
definition fiber_star_equiv (A : Type) : fiber (λx : A, star) star ≃ A :=
begin
fapply equiv.MK,
{ intro f, cases f with a H, exact a },
{ intro a, apply fiber.mk a, reflexivity },
{ intro a, reflexivity },
{ intro f, cases f with a H, change fiber.mk a (refl star) = fiber.mk a H,
rewrite [is_set.elim H (refl star)] }
end
definition fiber_const_equiv (A : Type) (a₀ : A) (a : A)
: fiber (λz : unit, a₀) a ≃ a₀ = a :=
calc
fiber (λz : unit, a₀) a
≃ Σz : unit, a₀ = a : fiber.sigma_char
... ≃ a₀ = a : sigma_unit_left
-- the pointed fiber of a pointed map, which is the fiber over the basepoint
definition pfiber [constructor] {X Y : Type*} (f : X →* Y) : Type* :=
pointed.MK (fiber f pt) (fiber.mk pt !respect_pt)
definition ppoint [constructor] {X Y : Type*} (f : X →* Y) : pfiber f →* X :=
pmap.mk point idp
end fiber
open function is_equiv
namespace fiber
/- Theorem 4.7.6 -/
variables {A : Type} {P Q : A → Type}
variable (f : Πa, P a → Q a)
definition fiber_total_equiv {a : A} (q : Q a)
: fiber (total f) ⟨a , q⟩ ≃ fiber (f a) q :=
calc
fiber (total f) ⟨a , q⟩
≃ Σ(w : Σx, P x), ⟨w.1 , f w.1 w.2 ⟩ = ⟨a , q⟩
: fiber.sigma_char
... ≃ Σ(x : A), Σ(p : P x), ⟨x , f x p⟩ = ⟨a , q⟩
: sigma_assoc_equiv
... ≃ Σ(x : A), Σ(p : P x), Σ(H : x = a), f x p =[H] q
:
begin
apply sigma_equiv_sigma_right, intro x,
apply sigma_equiv_sigma_right, intro p,
apply sigma_eq_equiv
end
... ≃ Σ(x : A), Σ(H : x = a), Σ(p : P x), f x p =[H] q
:
begin
apply sigma_equiv_sigma_right, intro x,
apply sigma_comm_equiv
end
... ≃ Σ(w : Σx, x = a), Σ(p : P w.1), f w.1 p =[w.2] q
: sigma_assoc_equiv
... ≃ Σ(p : P (center (Σx, x=a)).1), f (center (Σx, x=a)).1 p =[(center (Σx, x=a)).2] q
: sigma_equiv_of_is_contr_left
... ≃ Σ(p : P a), f a p =[idpath a] q
: equiv_of_eq idp
... ≃ Σ(p : P a), f a p = q
:
begin
apply sigma_equiv_sigma_right, intro p,
apply pathover_idp
end
... ≃ fiber (f a) q
: fiber.sigma_char
end fiber
|
6261530dbd53fcfe7242c9d8e4581f31f16bb43c | 05f637fa14ac28031cb1ea92086a0f4eb23ff2b1 | /tests/lean/scan_test1.lean | 360dca6d5379b9b4ebcf79e519956158706f4a9b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | codyroux/lean0.1 | 1ce92751d664aacff0529e139083304a7bbc8a71 | 0dc6fb974aa85ed6f305a2f4b10a53a44ee5f0ef | refs/heads/master | 1,610,830,535,062 | 1,402,150,480,000 | 1,402,150,480,000 | 19,588,851 | 2 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11 | lean | print 10.0. |
4ce00372370b36fa05fd54889574a9de2852f041 | 618003631150032a5676f229d13a079ac875ff77 | /src/topology/algebra/monoid.lean | b3cfc0da5f4f35a25ffefc5e7d2e6f92b1e7c35f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | awainverse/mathlib | 939b68c8486df66cfda64d327ad3d9165248c777 | ea76bd8f3ca0a8bf0a166a06a475b10663dec44a | refs/heads/master | 1,659,592,962,036 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 268,436,019 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,590,990,500,000 | 1,590,990,500,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,669 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
Theory of topological monoids.
TODO: generalize `topological_monoid` and `topological_add_monoid` to semigroups, or add a type class
`topological_operator α (*)`.
-/
import topology.continuous_on
import algebra.pi_instances
open classical set filter topological_space
open_locale classical topological_space
universes u v w
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
section topological_monoid
/-- A topological monoid is a monoid in which the multiplication is continuous as a function
`α × α → α`. -/
class topological_monoid (α : Type u) [topological_space α] [monoid α] : Prop :=
(continuous_mul : continuous (λp:α×α, p.1 * p.2))
/-- A topological (additive) monoid is a monoid in which the addition is
continuous as a function `α × α → α`. -/
class topological_add_monoid (α : Type u) [topological_space α] [add_monoid α] : Prop :=
(continuous_add : continuous (λp:α×α, p.1 + p.2))
attribute [to_additive topological_add_monoid] topological_monoid
section
variables [topological_space α] [monoid α] [topological_monoid α]
@[to_additive]
lemma continuous_mul : continuous (λp:α×α, p.1 * p.2) :=
topological_monoid.continuous_mul
@[to_additive]
lemma continuous.mul [topological_space β] {f : β → α} {g : β → α}
(hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g) :
continuous (λx, f x * g x) :=
continuous_mul.comp (hf.prod_mk hg)
@[to_additive]
lemma continuous_mul_left (a : α) : continuous (λ b:α, a * b) :=
continuous_const.mul continuous_id
@[to_additive]
lemma continuous_mul_right (a : α) : continuous (λ b:α, b * a) :=
continuous_id.mul continuous_const
@[to_additive]
lemma continuous_on.mul [topological_space β] {f : β → α} {g : β → α} {s : set β}
(hf : continuous_on f s) (hg : continuous_on g s) :
continuous_on (λx, f x * g x) s :=
(continuous_mul.comp_continuous_on (hf.prod hg) : _)
-- @[to_additive continuous_smul]
lemma continuous_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, continuous (λ a : α, a ^ n)
| 0 := by simpa using continuous_const
| (k+1) := show continuous (λ (a : α), a * a ^ k), from continuous_id.mul (continuous_pow _)
@[to_additive]
lemma tendsto_mul {a b : α} : tendsto (λp:α×α, p.fst * p.snd) (𝓝 (a, b)) (𝓝 (a * b)) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.mp topological_monoid.continuous_mul (a, b)
@[to_additive]
lemma filter.tendsto.mul {f : β → α} {g : β → α} {x : filter β} {a b : α}
(hf : tendsto f x (𝓝 a)) (hg : tendsto g x (𝓝 b)) :
tendsto (λx, f x * g x) x (𝓝 (a * b)) :=
tendsto_mul.comp (hf.prod_mk_nhds hg)
@[to_additive]
lemma continuous_at.mul [topological_space β] {f : β → α} {g : β → α} {x : β}
(hf : continuous_at f x) (hg : continuous_at g x) :
continuous_at (λx, f x * g x) x :=
hf.mul hg
@[to_additive]
lemma continuous_within_at.mul [topological_space β] {f : β → α} {g : β → α} {s : set β} {x : β}
(hf : continuous_within_at f s x) (hg : continuous_within_at g s x) :
continuous_within_at (λx, f x * g x) s x :=
hf.mul hg
@[to_additive]
lemma tendsto_list_prod {f : γ → β → α} {x : filter β} {a : γ → α} :
∀l:list γ, (∀c∈l, tendsto (f c) x (𝓝 (a c))) →
tendsto (λb, (l.map (λc, f c b)).prod) x (𝓝 ((l.map a).prod))
| [] _ := by simp [tendsto_const_nhds]
| (f :: l) h :=
begin
simp only [list.map_cons, list.prod_cons],
exact (h f (list.mem_cons_self _ _)).mul
(tendsto_list_prod l (assume c hc, h c (list.mem_cons_of_mem _ hc)))
end
@[to_additive]
lemma continuous_list_prod [topological_space β] {f : γ → β → α} (l : list γ)
(h : ∀c∈l, continuous (f c)) :
continuous (λa, (l.map (λc, f c a)).prod) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ assume x, tendsto_list_prod l $ assume c hc,
continuous_iff_continuous_at.1 (h c hc) x
@[to_additive topological_add_monoid]
instance [topological_space β] [monoid β] [topological_monoid β] : topological_monoid (α × β) :=
⟨((continuous_fst.comp continuous_fst).mul (continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd)).prod_mk
((continuous_snd.comp continuous_fst).mul (continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))⟩
attribute [instance] prod.topological_add_monoid
end
section
variables [topological_space α] [comm_monoid α]
@[to_additive]
lemma is_submonoid.mem_nhds_one (β : set α) [is_submonoid β] (oβ : is_open β) :
β ∈ 𝓝 (1 : α) :=
mem_nhds_sets_iff.2 ⟨β, (by refl), oβ, is_submonoid.one_mem⟩
variable [topological_monoid α]
@[to_additive]
lemma tendsto_multiset_prod {f : γ → β → α} {x : filter β} {a : γ → α} (s : multiset γ) :
(∀c∈s, tendsto (f c) x (𝓝 (a c))) →
tendsto (λb, (s.map (λc, f c b)).prod) x (𝓝 ((s.map a).prod)) :=
by { rcases s with ⟨l⟩, simp, exact tendsto_list_prod l }
@[to_additive]
lemma tendsto_finset_prod {f : γ → β → α} {x : filter β} {a : γ → α} (s : finset γ) :
(∀c∈s, tendsto (f c) x (𝓝 (a c))) → tendsto (λb, s.prod (λc, f c b)) x (𝓝 (s.prod a)) :=
tendsto_multiset_prod _
@[to_additive]
lemma continuous_multiset_prod [topological_space β] {f : γ → β → α} (s : multiset γ) :
(∀c∈s, continuous (f c)) → continuous (λa, (s.map (λc, f c a)).prod) :=
by { rcases s with ⟨l⟩, simp, exact continuous_list_prod l }
@[to_additive]
lemma continuous_finset_prod [topological_space β] {f : γ → β → α} (s : finset γ) :
(∀c∈s, continuous (f c)) → continuous (λa, s.prod (λc, f c a)) :=
continuous_multiset_prod _
end
end topological_monoid
|
6b32e90dc7ca0fa6c6ecca811c0d611cc3596282 | 4d2583807a5ac6caaffd3d7a5f646d61ca85d532 | /src/category_theory/sites/sheaf.lean | c8364bbfda47724648e8ccddc0f21bc36be10ed7 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AntoineChambert-Loir/mathlib | 64aabb896129885f12296a799818061bc90da1ff | 07be904260ab6e36a5769680b6012f03a4727134 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,187,631,771 | 1,636,719,886,000 | 1,636,719,886,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,003 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kevin Buzzard, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Buzzard, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import category_theory.sites.sheaf_of_types
import category_theory.limits.yoneda
import category_theory.limits.preserves.shapes.equalizers
import category_theory.limits.preserves.shapes.products
import category_theory.concrete_category
/-!
# Sheaves taking values in a category
If C is a category with a Grothendieck topology, we define the notion of a sheaf taking values in
an arbitrary category `A`. We follow the definition in https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VR,
noting that the presheaf of sets "defined above" can be seen in the comments between tags 00VQ and
00VR on the page https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VL. The advantage of this definition is
that we need no assumptions whatsoever on `A` other than the assumption that the morphisms in `C`
and `A` live in the same universe.
* An `A`-valued presheaf `P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A` is defined to be a sheaf (for the topology `J`) iff for
every `X : A`, the type-valued presheaves of sets given by sending `U : Cᵒᵖ` to `Hom_{A}(X, P U)`
are all sheaves of sets, see `category_theory.presheaf.is_sheaf`.
* When `A = Type`, this recovers the basic definition of sheaves of sets, see
`category_theory.is_sheaf_iff_is_sheaf_of_type`.
* An alternate definition when `C` is small, has pullbacks and `A` has products is given by an
equalizer condition `category_theory.presheaf.is_sheaf'`. This is equivalent to the earlier
definition, shown in `category_theory.presheaf.is_sheaf_iff_is_sheaf'`.
* When `A = Type`, this is *definitionally* equal to the equalizer condition for presieves in
`category_theory.sites.sheaf_of_types`.
* When `A` has limits and there is a functor `s : A ⥤ Type` which is faithful, reflects isomorphisms
and preserves limits, then `P : C^op ⥤ A` is a sheaf iff the underlying presheaf of types
`P ⋙ s : C^op ⥤ Type` is a sheaf (`category_theory.presheaf.is_sheaf_iff_is_sheaf_forget`).
Cf https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0073, which is a weaker version of this statement (it's
only over spaces, not sites) and https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00YR (a), which
additionally assumes filtered colimits.
-/
universes w v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
noncomputable theory
namespace category_theory
open opposite category_theory category limits sieve classical
namespace presheaf
variables {C : Type u₁} [category.{v₁} C]
variables {A : Type u₂} [category.{v₂} A]
variables (J : grothendieck_topology C)
-- We follow https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VL definition 00VR
/--
A sheaf of A is a presheaf P : C^op => A such that for every X : A, the
presheaf of types given by sending U : C to Hom_{A}(X, P U) is a sheaf of types.
https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VR
-/
def is_sheaf (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) : Prop :=
∀ X : A, presieve.is_sheaf J (P ⋙ coyoneda.obj (op X))
end presheaf
variables {C : Type u₁} [category.{v₁} C]
variables (J : grothendieck_topology C)
variables (A : Type u₂) [category.{v₂} A]
/-- The category of sheaves taking values in `A` on a grothendieck topology. -/
@[derive category]
def Sheaf : Type* :=
{P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A // presheaf.is_sheaf J P}
/-- The inclusion functor from sheaves to presheaves. -/
@[simps {rhs_md := semireducible}, derive [full, faithful]]
def Sheaf_to_presheaf : Sheaf J A ⥤ (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) :=
full_subcategory_inclusion (presheaf.is_sheaf J)
/-- The sheaf of sections guaranteed by the sheaf condition. -/
@[simps] abbreviation sheaf_over {A : Type u₂} [category.{v₂} A] {J : grothendieck_topology C}
(ℱ : Sheaf J A) (X : A) : SheafOfTypes J := ⟨ℱ.val ⋙ coyoneda.obj (op X), ℱ.property X⟩
lemma is_sheaf_iff_is_sheaf_of_type (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) :
presheaf.is_sheaf J P ↔ presieve.is_sheaf J P :=
begin
split,
{ intros hP,
refine presieve.is_sheaf_iso J _ (hP punit),
exact iso_whisker_left _ coyoneda.punit_iso ≪≫ P.right_unitor },
{ intros hP X Y S hS z hz,
refine ⟨λ x, (hP S hS).amalgamate (λ Z f hf, z f hf x) _, _, _⟩,
{ intros Y₁ Y₂ Z g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ hf₁ hf₂ h,
exact congr_fun (hz g₁ g₂ hf₁ hf₂ h) x },
{ intros Z f hf,
ext x,
apply presieve.is_sheaf_for.valid_glue },
{ intros y hy,
ext x,
apply (hP S hS).is_separated_for.ext,
intros Y' f hf,
rw [presieve.is_sheaf_for.valid_glue _ _ _ hf, ← hy _ hf],
refl } }
end
/--
The category of sheaves taking values in Type is the same as the category of set-valued sheaves.
-/
@[simps]
def Sheaf_equiv_SheafOfTypes : Sheaf J (Type w) ≌ SheafOfTypes J :=
{ functor :=
{ obj := λ S, ⟨S.1, (is_sheaf_iff_is_sheaf_of_type _ _).1 S.2⟩,
map := λ S₁ S₂ f, f },
inverse :=
{ obj := λ S, ⟨S.1, (is_sheaf_iff_is_sheaf_of_type _ _).2 S.2⟩,
map := λ S₁ S₂ f, f },
unit_iso := nat_iso.of_components (λ X, ⟨𝟙 _, 𝟙 _, by tidy, by tidy⟩) (by tidy),
counit_iso := nat_iso.of_components (λ X, ⟨𝟙 _, 𝟙 _, by tidy, by tidy⟩) (by tidy) }
instance : inhabited (Sheaf (⊥ : grothendieck_topology C) (Type w)) :=
⟨(Sheaf_equiv_SheafOfTypes _).inverse.obj (default _)⟩
end category_theory
namespace category_theory
open opposite category_theory category limits sieve classical
namespace presheaf
-- Under here is the equalizer story, which is equivalent if A has products (and doesn't
-- make sense otherwise). It's described in https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VL,
-- between 00VQ and 00VR.
variables {C : Type u₁} [category.{v₁} C]
variables {A : Type u₂} [category.{max v₁ u₁} A]
variables (J : grothendieck_topology C)
variables {U : C} (R : presieve U)
variables (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A)
section
variables [has_products A]
/--
The middle object of the fork diagram given in Equation (3) of [MM92], as well as the fork diagram
of https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VM.
-/
def first_obj : A :=
∏ (λ (f : Σ V, {f : V ⟶ U // R f}), P.obj (op f.1))
/--
The left morphism of the fork diagram given in Equation (3) of [MM92], as well as the fork diagram
of https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VM.
-/
def fork_map : P.obj (op U) ⟶ first_obj R P :=
pi.lift (λ f, P.map f.2.1.op)
variables [has_pullbacks C]
/--
The rightmost object of the fork diagram of https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VM, which
contains the data used to check a family of elements for a presieve is compatible.
-/
def second_obj : A :=
∏ (λ (fg : (Σ V, {f : V ⟶ U // R f}) × (Σ W, {g : W ⟶ U // R g})),
P.obj (op (pullback fg.1.2.1 fg.2.2.1)))
/-- The map `pr₀*` of https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VM. -/
def first_map : first_obj R P ⟶ second_obj R P :=
pi.lift (λ fg, pi.π _ _ ≫ P.map pullback.fst.op)
/-- The map `pr₁*` of https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VM. -/
def second_map : first_obj R P ⟶ second_obj R P :=
pi.lift (λ fg, pi.π _ _ ≫ P.map pullback.snd.op)
lemma w : fork_map R P ≫ first_map R P = fork_map R P ≫ second_map R P :=
begin
apply limit.hom_ext,
rintro ⟨⟨Y, f, hf⟩, ⟨Z, g, hg⟩⟩,
simp only [first_map, second_map, fork_map, limit.lift_π, limit.lift_π_assoc, assoc,
fan.mk_π_app, subtype.coe_mk, subtype.val_eq_coe],
rw [← P.map_comp, ← op_comp, pullback.condition],
simp,
end
/--
An alternative definition of the sheaf condition in terms of equalizers. This is shown to be
equivalent in `category_theory.presheaf.is_sheaf_iff_is_sheaf'`.
-/
def is_sheaf' (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) : Prop := ∀ (U : C) (R : presieve U) (hR : generate R ∈ J U),
nonempty (is_limit (fork.of_ι _ (w R P)))
/-- (Implementation). An auxiliary lemma to convert between sheaf conditions. -/
def is_sheaf_for_is_sheaf_for' (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) (s : A ⥤ Type (max v₁ u₁))
[Π J, preserves_limits_of_shape (discrete J) s] (U : C) (R : presieve U) :
is_limit (s.map_cone (fork.of_ι _ (w R P))) ≃
is_limit (fork.of_ι _ (equalizer.presieve.w (P ⋙ s) R)) :=
begin
apply equiv.trans (is_limit_map_cone_fork_equiv _ _) _,
apply (is_limit.postcompose_hom_equiv _ _).symm.trans (is_limit.equiv_iso_limit _),
{ apply nat_iso.of_components _ _,
{ rintro (_ | _),
{ apply preserves_product.iso s },
{ apply preserves_product.iso s } },
{ rintro _ _ (_ | _),
{ ext : 1,
dsimp [equalizer.presieve.first_map, first_map],
simp only [limit.lift_π, map_lift_pi_comparison, assoc, fan.mk_π_app, functor.map_comp],
erw pi_comparison_comp_π_assoc },
{ ext : 1,
dsimp [equalizer.presieve.second_map, second_map],
simp only [limit.lift_π, map_lift_pi_comparison, assoc, fan.mk_π_app, functor.map_comp],
erw pi_comparison_comp_π_assoc },
{ dsimp,
simp } } },
{ refine fork.ext (iso.refl _) _,
dsimp [equalizer.fork_map, fork_map],
simp }
end
/-- The equalizer definition of a sheaf given by `is_sheaf'` is equivalent to `is_sheaf`. -/
theorem is_sheaf_iff_is_sheaf' :
is_sheaf J P ↔ is_sheaf' J P :=
begin
split,
{ intros h U R hR,
refine ⟨_⟩,
apply coyoneda_jointly_reflects_limits,
intro X,
have q : presieve.is_sheaf_for (P ⋙ coyoneda.obj X) _ := h X.unop _ hR,
rw ←presieve.is_sheaf_for_iff_generate at q,
rw equalizer.presieve.sheaf_condition at q,
replace q := classical.choice q,
apply (is_sheaf_for_is_sheaf_for' _ _ _ _).symm q },
{ intros h U X S hS,
rw equalizer.presieve.sheaf_condition,
refine ⟨_⟩,
refine is_sheaf_for_is_sheaf_for' _ _ _ _ _,
apply is_limit_of_preserves,
apply classical.choice (h _ S _),
simpa }
end
end
section concrete
variables [has_pullbacks C]
/--
For a concrete category `(A, s)` where the forgetful functor `s : A ⥤ Type v` preserves limits and
reflects isomorphisms, and `A` has limits, an `A`-valued presheaf `P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A` is a sheaf iff its
underlying `Type`-valued presheaf `P ⋙ s : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type` is a sheaf.
Note this lemma applies for "algebraic" categories, eg groups, abelian groups and rings, but not
for the category of topological spaces, topological rings, etc since reflecting isomorphisms doesn't
hold.
-/
lemma is_sheaf_iff_is_sheaf_forget (s : A ⥤ Type (max v₁ u₁))
[has_limits A] [preserves_limits s] [reflects_isomorphisms s] :
is_sheaf J P ↔ is_sheaf J (P ⋙ s) :=
begin
rw [is_sheaf_iff_is_sheaf', is_sheaf_iff_is_sheaf'],
apply forall_congr (λ U, _),
apply ball_congr (λ R hR, _),
letI : reflects_limits s := reflects_limits_of_reflects_isomorphisms,
have : is_limit (s.map_cone (fork.of_ι _ (w R P))) ≃ is_limit (fork.of_ι _ (w R (P ⋙ s))) :=
is_sheaf_for_is_sheaf_for' P s U R,
rw ←equiv.nonempty_congr this,
split,
{ exact nonempty.map (λ t, is_limit_of_preserves s t) },
{ exact nonempty.map (λ t, is_limit_of_reflects s t) }
end
end concrete
end presheaf
end category_theory
|
a949f0e73e7c87ba061ade244f1fa4d3b8234b4a | 9dc8cecdf3c4634764a18254e94d43da07142918 | /src/ring_theory/dedekind_domain/ideal.lean | 78f6e62740ad2df0fd7bf1c40107f90fa95a4fc4 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcommelin/mathlib | d8456447c36c176e14d96d9e76f39841f69d2d9b | ee8279351a2e434c2852345c51b728d22af5a156 | refs/heads/master | 1,664,782,136,488 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 132,563,656 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,663,599,929,000 | 1,525,760,539,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 58,182 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenji Nakagawa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenji Nakagawa, Anne Baanen, Filippo A. E. Nuccio
-/
import algebra.algebra.subalgebra.pointwise
import algebraic_geometry.prime_spectrum.noetherian
import order.hom.basic
import ring_theory.dedekind_domain.basic
import ring_theory.fractional_ideal
import ring_theory.principal_ideal_domain
import ring_theory.chain_of_divisors
/-!
# Dedekind domains and ideals
In this file, we show a ring is a Dedekind domain iff all fractional ideals are invertible.
Then we prove some results on the unique factorization monoid structure of the ideals.
## Main definitions
- `is_dedekind_domain_inv` alternatively defines a Dedekind domain as an integral domain where
every nonzero fractional ideal is invertible.
- `is_dedekind_domain_inv_iff` shows that this does note depend on the choice of field of
fractions.
- `is_dedekind_domain.height_one_spectrum` defines the type of nonzero prime ideals of `R`.
## Main results:
- `is_dedekind_domain_iff_is_dedekind_domain_inv`
- `ideal.unique_factorization_monoid`
## Implementation notes
The definitions that involve a field of fractions choose a canonical field of fractions,
but are independent of that choice. The `..._iff` lemmas express this independence.
Often, definitions assume that Dedekind domains are not fields. We found it more practical
to add a `(h : ¬ is_field A)` assumption whenever this is explicitly needed.
## References
* [D. Marcus, *Number Fields*][marcus1977number]
* [J.W.S. Cassels, A. Frölich, *Algebraic Number Theory*][cassels1967algebraic]
* [J. Neukirch, *Algebraic Number Theory*][Neukirch1992]
## Tags
dedekind domain, dedekind ring
-/
variables (R A K : Type*) [comm_ring R] [comm_ring A] [field K]
open_locale non_zero_divisors polynomial
variables [is_domain A]
section inverse
namespace fractional_ideal
variables {R₁ : Type*} [comm_ring R₁] [is_domain R₁] [algebra R₁ K] [is_fraction_ring R₁ K]
variables {I J : fractional_ideal R₁⁰ K}
noncomputable instance : has_inv (fractional_ideal R₁⁰ K) := ⟨λ I, 1 / I⟩
lemma inv_eq : I⁻¹ = 1 / I := rfl
lemma inv_zero' : (0 : fractional_ideal R₁⁰ K)⁻¹ = 0 := fractional_ideal.div_zero
lemma inv_nonzero {J : fractional_ideal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) :
J⁻¹ = ⟨(1 : fractional_ideal R₁⁰ K) / J, fractional_ideal.fractional_div_of_nonzero h⟩ :=
fractional_ideal.div_nonzero _
lemma coe_inv_of_nonzero {J : fractional_ideal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) :
(↑J⁻¹ : submodule R₁ K) = is_localization.coe_submodule K ⊤ / J :=
by { rwa inv_nonzero _, refl, assumption }
variables {K}
lemma mem_inv_iff (hI : I ≠ 0) {x : K} :
x ∈ I⁻¹ ↔ ∀ y ∈ I, x * y ∈ (1 : fractional_ideal R₁⁰ K) :=
fractional_ideal.mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hI
lemma inv_anti_mono (hI : I ≠ 0) (hJ : J ≠ 0) (hIJ : I ≤ J) :
J⁻¹ ≤ I⁻¹ :=
λ x, by { simp only [mem_inv_iff hI, mem_inv_iff hJ], exact λ h y hy, h y (hIJ hy) }
lemma le_self_mul_inv {I : fractional_ideal R₁⁰ K} (hI : I ≤ (1 : fractional_ideal R₁⁰ K)) :
I ≤ I * I⁻¹ :=
fractional_ideal.le_self_mul_one_div hI
variables (K)
lemma coe_ideal_le_self_mul_inv (I : ideal R₁) :
(I : fractional_ideal R₁⁰ K) ≤ I * I⁻¹ :=
le_self_mul_inv fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_le_one
/-- `I⁻¹` is the inverse of `I` if `I` has an inverse. -/
theorem right_inverse_eq (I J : fractional_ideal R₁⁰ K) (h : I * J = 1) :
J = I⁻¹ :=
begin
have hI : I ≠ 0 := fractional_ideal.ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one I J h,
suffices h' : I * (1 / I) = 1,
{ exact (congr_arg units.inv $
@units.ext _ _ (units.mk_of_mul_eq_one _ _ h) (units.mk_of_mul_eq_one _ _ h') rfl) },
apply le_antisymm,
{ apply fractional_ideal.mul_le.mpr _,
intros x hx y hy,
rw mul_comm,
exact (fractional_ideal.mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hI).mp hy x hx },
rw ← h,
apply fractional_ideal.mul_left_mono I,
apply (fractional_ideal.le_div_iff_of_nonzero hI).mpr _,
intros y hy x hx,
rw mul_comm,
exact fractional_ideal.mul_mem_mul hx hy
end
theorem mul_inv_cancel_iff {I : fractional_ideal R₁⁰ K} :
I * I⁻¹ = 1 ↔ ∃ J, I * J = 1 :=
⟨λ h, ⟨I⁻¹, h⟩, λ ⟨J, hJ⟩, by rwa ← right_inverse_eq K I J hJ⟩
lemma mul_inv_cancel_iff_is_unit {I : fractional_ideal R₁⁰ K} :
I * I⁻¹ = 1 ↔ is_unit I :=
(mul_inv_cancel_iff K).trans is_unit_iff_exists_inv.symm
variables {K' : Type*} [field K'] [algebra R₁ K'] [is_fraction_ring R₁ K']
@[simp] lemma map_inv (I : fractional_ideal R₁⁰ K) (h : K ≃ₐ[R₁] K') :
(I⁻¹).map (h : K →ₐ[R₁] K') = (I.map h)⁻¹ :=
by rw [inv_eq, fractional_ideal.map_div, fractional_ideal.map_one, inv_eq]
open submodule submodule.is_principal
@[simp] lemma span_singleton_inv (x : K) :
(fractional_ideal.span_singleton R₁⁰ x)⁻¹ = fractional_ideal.span_singleton _ (x⁻¹) :=
fractional_ideal.one_div_span_singleton x
lemma mul_generator_self_inv {R₁ : Type*} [comm_ring R₁] [algebra R₁ K] [is_localization R₁⁰ K]
(I : fractional_ideal R₁⁰ K) [submodule.is_principal (I : submodule R₁ K)] (h : I ≠ 0) :
I * fractional_ideal.span_singleton _ (generator (I : submodule R₁ K))⁻¹ = 1 :=
begin
-- Rewrite only the `I` that appears alone.
conv_lhs { congr, rw fractional_ideal.eq_span_singleton_of_principal I },
rw [fractional_ideal.span_singleton_mul_span_singleton, mul_inv_cancel,
fractional_ideal.span_singleton_one],
intro generator_I_eq_zero,
apply h,
rw [fractional_ideal.eq_span_singleton_of_principal I, generator_I_eq_zero,
fractional_ideal.span_singleton_zero]
end
lemma invertible_of_principal (I : fractional_ideal R₁⁰ K)
[submodule.is_principal (I : submodule R₁ K)] (h : I ≠ 0) :
I * I⁻¹ = 1 :=
(fractional_ideal.mul_div_self_cancel_iff).mpr
⟨fractional_ideal.span_singleton _ (generator (I : submodule R₁ K))⁻¹,
mul_generator_self_inv _ I h⟩
lemma invertible_iff_generator_nonzero (I : fractional_ideal R₁⁰ K)
[submodule.is_principal (I : submodule R₁ K)] :
I * I⁻¹ = 1 ↔ generator (I : submodule R₁ K) ≠ 0 :=
begin
split,
{ intros hI hg,
apply fractional_ideal.ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one _ _ hI,
rw [fractional_ideal.eq_span_singleton_of_principal I, hg,
fractional_ideal.span_singleton_zero] },
{ intro hg,
apply invertible_of_principal,
rw [fractional_ideal.eq_span_singleton_of_principal I],
intro hI,
have := fractional_ideal.mem_span_singleton_self _ (generator (I : submodule R₁ K)),
rw [hI, fractional_ideal.mem_zero_iff] at this,
contradiction }
end
lemma is_principal_inv (I : fractional_ideal R₁⁰ K)
[submodule.is_principal (I : submodule R₁ K)] (h : I ≠ 0) :
submodule.is_principal (I⁻¹).1 :=
begin
rw [fractional_ideal.val_eq_coe, fractional_ideal.is_principal_iff],
use (generator (I : submodule R₁ K))⁻¹,
have hI : I * fractional_ideal.span_singleton _ ((generator (I : submodule R₁ K))⁻¹) = 1,
apply mul_generator_self_inv _ I h,
exact (right_inverse_eq _ I (fractional_ideal.span_singleton _
((generator (I : submodule R₁ K))⁻¹)) hI).symm
end
@[simp] lemma inv_one : (1⁻¹ : fractional_ideal R₁⁰ K) = 1 :=
fractional_ideal.div_one
end fractional_ideal
/--
A Dedekind domain is an integral domain such that every fractional ideal has an inverse.
This is equivalent to `is_dedekind_domain`.
In particular we provide a `fractional_ideal.comm_group_with_zero` instance,
assuming `is_dedekind_domain A`, which implies `is_dedekind_domain_inv`. For **integral** ideals,
`is_dedekind_domain`(`_inv`) implies only `ideal.cancel_comm_monoid_with_zero`.
-/
def is_dedekind_domain_inv : Prop :=
∀ I ≠ (⊥ : fractional_ideal A⁰ (fraction_ring A)), I * I⁻¹ = 1
open fractional_ideal
variables {R A K}
lemma is_dedekind_domain_inv_iff [algebra A K] [is_fraction_ring A K] :
is_dedekind_domain_inv A ↔
(∀ I ≠ (⊥ : fractional_ideal A⁰ K), I * I⁻¹ = 1) :=
begin
let h := fractional_ideal.map_equiv (fraction_ring.alg_equiv A K),
refine h.to_equiv.forall_congr (λ I, _),
rw ← h.to_equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq,
simp [is_dedekind_domain_inv, show ⇑h.to_equiv = h, from rfl],
end
lemma fractional_ideal.adjoin_integral_eq_one_of_is_unit [algebra A K] [is_fraction_ring A K]
(x : K) (hx : is_integral A x) (hI : is_unit (adjoin_integral A⁰ x hx)) :
adjoin_integral A⁰ x hx = 1 :=
begin
set I := adjoin_integral A⁰ x hx,
have mul_self : I * I = I,
{ apply fractional_ideal.coe_to_submodule_injective, simp },
convert congr_arg (* I⁻¹) mul_self;
simp only [(mul_inv_cancel_iff_is_unit K).mpr hI, mul_assoc, mul_one],
end
namespace is_dedekind_domain_inv
variables [algebra A K] [is_fraction_ring A K] (h : is_dedekind_domain_inv A)
include h
lemma mul_inv_eq_one {I : fractional_ideal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) : I * I⁻¹ = 1 :=
is_dedekind_domain_inv_iff.mp h I hI
lemma inv_mul_eq_one {I : fractional_ideal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) : I⁻¹ * I = 1 :=
(mul_comm _ _).trans (h.mul_inv_eq_one hI)
protected lemma is_unit {I : fractional_ideal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) : is_unit I :=
is_unit_of_mul_eq_one _ _ (h.mul_inv_eq_one hI)
lemma is_noetherian_ring : is_noetherian_ring A :=
begin
refine is_noetherian_ring_iff.mpr ⟨λ (I : ideal A), _⟩,
by_cases hI : I = ⊥,
{ rw hI, apply submodule.fg_bot },
have hI : (I : fractional_ideal A⁰ (fraction_ring A)) ≠ 0 :=
(coe_to_fractional_ideal_ne_zero (le_refl (non_zero_divisors A))).mpr hI,
exact I.fg_of_is_unit (is_fraction_ring.injective A (fraction_ring A)) (h.is_unit hI)
end
lemma integrally_closed : is_integrally_closed A :=
begin
-- It suffices to show that for integral `x`,
-- `A[x]` (which is a fractional ideal) is in fact equal to `A`.
refine ⟨λ x hx, _⟩,
rw [← set.mem_range, ← algebra.mem_bot, ← subalgebra.mem_to_submodule, algebra.to_submodule_bot,
← coe_span_singleton A⁰ (1 : fraction_ring A), fractional_ideal.span_singleton_one,
← fractional_ideal.adjoin_integral_eq_one_of_is_unit x hx (h.is_unit _)],
{ exact mem_adjoin_integral_self A⁰ x hx },
{ exact λ h, one_ne_zero (eq_zero_iff.mp h 1 (subalgebra.one_mem _)) },
end
open ring
lemma dimension_le_one : dimension_le_one A :=
begin
-- We're going to show that `P` is maximal because any (maximal) ideal `M`
-- that is strictly larger would be `⊤`.
rintros P P_ne hP,
refine ideal.is_maximal_def.mpr ⟨hP.ne_top, λ M hM, _⟩,
-- We may assume `P` and `M` (as fractional ideals) are nonzero.
have P'_ne : (P : fractional_ideal A⁰ (fraction_ring A)) ≠ 0 :=
(coe_to_fractional_ideal_ne_zero (le_refl (non_zero_divisors A))).mpr P_ne,
have M'_ne : (M : fractional_ideal A⁰ (fraction_ring A)) ≠ 0 :=
(coe_to_fractional_ideal_ne_zero (le_refl (non_zero_divisors A))).mpr
(lt_of_le_of_lt bot_le hM).ne',
-- In particular, we'll show `M⁻¹ * P ≤ P`
suffices : (M⁻¹ * P : fractional_ideal A⁰ (fraction_ring A)) ≤ P,
{ rw [eq_top_iff, ← coe_ideal_le_coe_ideal (fraction_ring A), fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_top],
calc (1 : fractional_ideal A⁰ (fraction_ring A)) = _ * _ * _ : _
... ≤ _ * _ : mul_right_mono (P⁻¹ * M : fractional_ideal A⁰ (fraction_ring A)) this
... = M : _,
{ rw [mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc ↑P, h.mul_inv_eq_one P'_ne, one_mul, h.inv_mul_eq_one M'_ne] },
{ rw [← mul_assoc ↑P, h.mul_inv_eq_one P'_ne, one_mul] },
{ apply_instance } },
-- Suppose we have `x ∈ M⁻¹ * P`, then in fact `x = algebra_map _ _ y` for some `y`.
intros x hx,
have le_one : (M⁻¹ * P : fractional_ideal A⁰ (fraction_ring A)) ≤ 1,
{ rw [← h.inv_mul_eq_one M'_ne],
exact fractional_ideal.mul_left_mono _ ((coe_ideal_le_coe_ideal (fraction_ring A)).mpr hM.le) },
obtain ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ := (mem_coe_ideal _).mp (le_one hx),
-- Since `M` is strictly greater than `P`, let `z ∈ M \ P`.
obtain ⟨z, hzM, hzp⟩ := set_like.exists_of_lt hM,
-- We have `z * y ∈ M * (M⁻¹ * P) = P`.
have zy_mem := fractional_ideal.mul_mem_mul (mem_coe_ideal_of_mem A⁰ hzM) hx,
rw [← ring_hom.map_mul, ← mul_assoc, h.mul_inv_eq_one M'_ne, one_mul] at zy_mem,
obtain ⟨zy, hzy, zy_eq⟩ := (mem_coe_ideal A⁰).mp zy_mem,
rw is_fraction_ring.injective A (fraction_ring A) zy_eq at hzy,
-- But `P` is a prime ideal, so `z ∉ P` implies `y ∈ P`, as desired.
exact mem_coe_ideal_of_mem A⁰ (or.resolve_left (hP.mem_or_mem hzy) hzp)
end
/-- Showing one side of the equivalence between the definitions
`is_dedekind_domain_inv` and `is_dedekind_domain` of Dedekind domains. -/
theorem is_dedekind_domain : is_dedekind_domain A :=
⟨h.is_noetherian_ring, h.dimension_le_one, h.integrally_closed⟩
end is_dedekind_domain_inv
variables [algebra A K] [is_fraction_ring A K]
/-- Specialization of `exists_prime_spectrum_prod_le_and_ne_bot_of_domain` to Dedekind domains:
Let `I : ideal A` be a nonzero ideal, where `A` is a Dedekind domain that is not a field.
Then `exists_prime_spectrum_prod_le_and_ne_bot_of_domain` states we can find a product of prime
ideals that is contained within `I`. This lemma extends that result by making the product minimal:
let `M` be a maximal ideal that contains `I`, then the product including `M` is contained within `I`
and the product excluding `M` is not contained within `I`. -/
lemma exists_multiset_prod_cons_le_and_prod_not_le [is_dedekind_domain A]
(hNF : ¬ is_field A) {I M : ideal A} (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) (hIM : I ≤ M) [hM : M.is_maximal] :
∃ (Z : multiset (prime_spectrum A)),
(M ::ₘ (Z.map prime_spectrum.as_ideal)).prod ≤ I ∧
¬ (multiset.prod (Z.map prime_spectrum.as_ideal) ≤ I) :=
begin
-- Let `Z` be a minimal set of prime ideals such that their product is contained in `J`.
obtain ⟨Z₀, hZ₀⟩ := prime_spectrum.exists_prime_spectrum_prod_le_and_ne_bot_of_domain hNF hI0,
obtain ⟨Z, ⟨hZI, hprodZ⟩, h_eraseZ⟩ := multiset.well_founded_lt.has_min
(λ Z, (Z.map prime_spectrum.as_ideal).prod ≤ I ∧ (Z.map prime_spectrum.as_ideal).prod ≠ ⊥)
⟨Z₀, hZ₀⟩,
have hZM : multiset.prod (Z.map prime_spectrum.as_ideal) ≤ M := le_trans hZI hIM,
have hZ0 : Z ≠ 0, { rintro rfl, simpa [hM.ne_top] using hZM },
obtain ⟨_, hPZ', hPM⟩ := (hM.is_prime.multiset_prod_le (mt multiset.map_eq_zero.mp hZ0)).mp hZM,
-- Then in fact there is a `P ∈ Z` with `P ≤ M`.
obtain ⟨P, hPZ, rfl⟩ := multiset.mem_map.mp hPZ',
letI := classical.dec_eq (ideal A),
have := multiset.map_erase prime_spectrum.as_ideal subtype.coe_injective P Z,
obtain ⟨hP0, hZP0⟩ : P.as_ideal ≠ ⊥ ∧ ((Z.erase P).map prime_spectrum.as_ideal).prod ≠ ⊥,
{ rwa [ne.def, ← multiset.cons_erase hPZ', multiset.prod_cons, ideal.mul_eq_bot,
not_or_distrib, ← this] at hprodZ },
-- By maximality of `P` and `M`, we have that `P ≤ M` implies `P = M`.
have hPM' := (is_dedekind_domain.dimension_le_one _ hP0 P.is_prime).eq_of_le hM.ne_top hPM,
substI hPM',
-- By minimality of `Z`, erasing `P` from `Z` is exactly what we need.
refine ⟨Z.erase P, _, _⟩,
{ convert hZI,
rw [this, multiset.cons_erase hPZ'] },
{ refine λ h, h_eraseZ (Z.erase P) ⟨h, _⟩ (multiset.erase_lt.mpr hPZ),
exact hZP0 }
end
namespace fractional_ideal
open ideal
lemma exists_not_mem_one_of_ne_bot [is_dedekind_domain A]
(hNF : ¬ is_field A) {I : ideal A} (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) (hI1 : I ≠ ⊤) :
∃ x : K, x ∈ (I⁻¹ : fractional_ideal A⁰ K) ∧ x ∉ (1 : fractional_ideal A⁰ K) :=
begin
-- WLOG, let `I` be maximal.
suffices : ∀ {M : ideal A} (hM : M.is_maximal),
∃ x : K, x ∈ (M⁻¹ : fractional_ideal A⁰ K) ∧ x ∉ (1 : fractional_ideal A⁰ K),
{ obtain ⟨M, hM, hIM⟩ : ∃ (M : ideal A), is_maximal M ∧ I ≤ M := ideal.exists_le_maximal I hI1,
resetI,
have hM0 := (M.bot_lt_of_maximal hNF).ne',
obtain ⟨x, hxM, hx1⟩ := this hM,
refine ⟨x, inv_anti_mono _ _ ((coe_ideal_le_coe_ideal _).mpr hIM) hxM, hx1⟩;
apply fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_ne_zero; assumption },
-- Let `a` be a nonzero element of `M` and `J` the ideal generated by `a`.
intros M hM,
resetI,
obtain ⟨⟨a, haM⟩, ha0⟩ := submodule.nonzero_mem_of_bot_lt (M.bot_lt_of_maximal hNF),
replace ha0 : a ≠ 0 := subtype.coe_injective.ne ha0,
let J : ideal A := ideal.span {a},
have hJ0 : J ≠ ⊥ := mt ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot.mp ha0,
have hJM : J ≤ M := ideal.span_le.mpr (set.singleton_subset_iff.mpr haM),
have hM0 : ⊥ < M := M.bot_lt_of_maximal hNF,
-- Then we can find a product of prime (hence maximal) ideals contained in `J`,
-- such that removing element `M` from the product is not contained in `J`.
obtain ⟨Z, hle, hnle⟩ := exists_multiset_prod_cons_le_and_prod_not_le hNF hJ0 hJM,
-- Choose an element `b` of the product that is not in `J`.
obtain ⟨b, hbZ, hbJ⟩ := set_like.not_le_iff_exists.mp hnle,
have hnz_fa : algebra_map A K a ≠ 0 :=
mt ((injective_iff_map_eq_zero _).mp (is_fraction_ring.injective A K) a) ha0,
have hb0 : algebra_map A K b ≠ 0 :=
mt ((injective_iff_map_eq_zero _).mp (is_fraction_ring.injective A K) b)
(λ h, hbJ $ h.symm ▸ J.zero_mem),
-- Then `b a⁻¹ : K` is in `M⁻¹` but not in `1`.
refine ⟨algebra_map A K b * (algebra_map A K a)⁻¹, (mem_inv_iff _).mpr _, _⟩,
{ exact (fractional_ideal.coe_to_fractional_ideal_ne_zero le_rfl).mpr hM0.ne' },
{ rintro y₀ hy₀,
obtain ⟨y, h_Iy, rfl⟩ := (fractional_ideal.mem_coe_ideal _).mp hy₀,
rw [mul_comm, ← mul_assoc, ← ring_hom.map_mul],
have h_yb : y * b ∈ J,
{ apply hle,
rw multiset.prod_cons,
exact submodule.smul_mem_smul h_Iy hbZ },
rw ideal.mem_span_singleton' at h_yb,
rcases h_yb with ⟨c, hc⟩,
rw [← hc, ring_hom.map_mul, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel hnz_fa, mul_one],
apply fractional_ideal.coe_mem_one },
{ refine mt (fractional_ideal.mem_one_iff _).mp _,
rintros ⟨x', h₂_abs⟩,
rw [← div_eq_mul_inv, eq_div_iff_mul_eq hnz_fa, ← ring_hom.map_mul] at h₂_abs,
have := ideal.mem_span_singleton'.mpr ⟨x', is_fraction_ring.injective A K h₂_abs⟩,
contradiction },
end
lemma one_mem_inv_coe_ideal {I : ideal A} (hI : I ≠ ⊥) :
(1 : K) ∈ (I : fractional_ideal A⁰ K)⁻¹ :=
begin
rw mem_inv_iff (fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_ne_zero hI),
intros y hy,
rw one_mul,
exact coe_ideal_le_one hy,
assumption
end
lemma mul_inv_cancel_of_le_one [h : is_dedekind_domain A]
{I : ideal A} (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) (hI : ((I * I⁻¹)⁻¹ : fractional_ideal A⁰ K) ≤ 1) :
(I * I⁻¹ : fractional_ideal A⁰ K) = 1 :=
begin
-- Handle a few trivial cases.
by_cases hI1 : I = ⊤,
{ rw [hI1, coe_ideal_top, one_mul, fractional_ideal.inv_one] },
by_cases hNF : is_field A,
{ letI := hNF.to_field, rcases hI1 (I.eq_bot_or_top.resolve_left hI0) },
-- We'll show a contradiction with `exists_not_mem_one_of_ne_bot`:
-- `J⁻¹ = (I * I⁻¹)⁻¹` cannot have an element `x ∉ 1`, so it must equal `1`.
obtain ⟨J, hJ⟩ : ∃ (J : ideal A), (J : fractional_ideal A⁰ K) = I * I⁻¹ :=
le_one_iff_exists_coe_ideal.mp mul_one_div_le_one,
by_cases hJ0 : J = ⊥,
{ subst hJ0,
refine absurd _ hI0,
rw [eq_bot_iff, ← coe_ideal_le_coe_ideal K, hJ],
exact coe_ideal_le_self_mul_inv K I,
apply_instance },
by_cases hJ1 : J = ⊤,
{ rw [← hJ, hJ1, coe_ideal_top] },
obtain ⟨x, hx, hx1⟩ : ∃ (x : K),
x ∈ (J : fractional_ideal A⁰ K)⁻¹ ∧ x ∉ (1 : fractional_ideal A⁰ K) :=
exists_not_mem_one_of_ne_bot hNF hJ0 hJ1,
contrapose! hx1 with h_abs,
rw hJ at hx,
exact hI hx,
end
/-- Nonzero integral ideals in a Dedekind domain are invertible.
We will use this to show that nonzero fractional ideals are invertible,
and finally conclude that fractional ideals in a Dedekind domain form a group with zero.
-/
lemma coe_ideal_mul_inv [h : is_dedekind_domain A] (I : ideal A) (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) :
(I * I⁻¹ : fractional_ideal A⁰ K) = 1 :=
begin
-- We'll show `1 ≤ J⁻¹ = (I * I⁻¹)⁻¹ ≤ 1`.
apply mul_inv_cancel_of_le_one hI0,
by_cases hJ0 : (I * I⁻¹ : fractional_ideal A⁰ K) = 0,
{ rw [hJ0, inv_zero'], exact fractional_ideal.zero_le _ },
intros x hx,
-- In particular, we'll show all `x ∈ J⁻¹` are integral.
suffices : x ∈ integral_closure A K,
{ rwa [is_integrally_closed.integral_closure_eq_bot, algebra.mem_bot, set.mem_range,
← fractional_ideal.mem_one_iff] at this;
assumption },
-- For that, we'll find a subalgebra that is f.g. as a module and contains `x`.
-- `A` is a noetherian ring, so we just need to find a subalgebra between `{x}` and `I⁻¹`.
rw mem_integral_closure_iff_mem_fg,
have x_mul_mem : ∀ b ∈ (I⁻¹ : fractional_ideal A⁰ K), x * b ∈ (I⁻¹ : fractional_ideal A⁰ K),
{ intros b hb,
rw mem_inv_iff at ⊢ hx,
swap, { exact fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_ne_zero hI0 },
swap, { exact hJ0 },
simp only [mul_assoc, mul_comm b] at ⊢ hx,
intros y hy,
exact hx _ (fractional_ideal.mul_mem_mul hy hb) },
-- It turns out the subalgebra consisting of all `p(x)` for `p : polynomial A` works.
refine ⟨alg_hom.range (polynomial.aeval x : A[X] →ₐ[A] K),
is_noetherian_submodule.mp (fractional_ideal.is_noetherian I⁻¹) _ (λ y hy, _),
⟨polynomial.X, polynomial.aeval_X x⟩⟩,
obtain ⟨p, rfl⟩ := (alg_hom.mem_range _).mp hy,
rw polynomial.aeval_eq_sum_range,
refine submodule.sum_mem _ (λ i hi, submodule.smul_mem _ _ _),
clear hi,
induction i with i ih,
{ rw pow_zero, exact one_mem_inv_coe_ideal hI0 },
{ show x ^ i.succ ∈ (I⁻¹ : fractional_ideal A⁰ K),
rw pow_succ, exact x_mul_mem _ ih },
end
/-- Nonzero fractional ideals in a Dedekind domain are units.
This is also available as `_root_.mul_inv_cancel`, using the
`comm_group_with_zero` instance defined below.
-/
protected theorem mul_inv_cancel [is_dedekind_domain A]
{I : fractional_ideal A⁰ K} (hne : I ≠ 0) : I * I⁻¹ = 1 :=
begin
obtain ⟨a, J, ha, hJ⟩ :
∃ (a : A) (aI : ideal A), a ≠ 0 ∧ I = span_singleton A⁰ (algebra_map _ _ a)⁻¹ * aI :=
exists_eq_span_singleton_mul I,
suffices h₂ : I * (span_singleton A⁰ (algebra_map _ _ a) * J⁻¹) = 1,
{ rw mul_inv_cancel_iff,
exact ⟨span_singleton A⁰ (algebra_map _ _ a) * J⁻¹, h₂⟩ },
subst hJ,
rw [mul_assoc, mul_left_comm (J : fractional_ideal A⁰ K), coe_ideal_mul_inv, mul_one,
fractional_ideal.span_singleton_mul_span_singleton, inv_mul_cancel,
fractional_ideal.span_singleton_one],
{ exact mt ((injective_iff_map_eq_zero (algebra_map A K)).mp
(is_fraction_ring.injective A K) _) ha },
{ exact fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_ne_zero_iff.mp (right_ne_zero_of_mul hne) }
end
lemma mul_right_le_iff [is_dedekind_domain A] {J : fractional_ideal A⁰ K}
(hJ : J ≠ 0) : ∀ {I I'}, I * J ≤ I' * J ↔ I ≤ I' :=
begin
intros I I',
split,
{ intros h, convert mul_right_mono J⁻¹ h;
rw [mul_assoc, fractional_ideal.mul_inv_cancel hJ, mul_one] },
{ exact λ h, mul_right_mono J h }
end
lemma mul_left_le_iff [is_dedekind_domain A] {J : fractional_ideal A⁰ K}
(hJ : J ≠ 0) {I I'} : J * I ≤ J * I' ↔ I ≤ I' :=
by convert fractional_ideal.mul_right_le_iff hJ using 1; simp only [mul_comm]
lemma mul_right_strict_mono [is_dedekind_domain A] {I : fractional_ideal A⁰ K}
(hI : I ≠ 0) : strict_mono (* I) :=
strict_mono_of_le_iff_le (λ _ _, (mul_right_le_iff hI).symm)
lemma mul_left_strict_mono [is_dedekind_domain A] {I : fractional_ideal A⁰ K}
(hI : I ≠ 0) : strict_mono ((*) I) :=
strict_mono_of_le_iff_le (λ _ _, (mul_left_le_iff hI).symm)
/--
This is also available as `_root_.div_eq_mul_inv`, using the
`comm_group_with_zero` instance defined below.
-/
protected lemma div_eq_mul_inv [is_dedekind_domain A] (I J : fractional_ideal A⁰ K) :
I / J = I * J⁻¹ :=
begin
by_cases hJ : J = 0,
{ rw [hJ, div_zero, inv_zero', mul_zero] },
refine le_antisymm ((mul_right_le_iff hJ).mp _) ((le_div_iff_mul_le hJ).mpr _),
{ rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm J⁻¹, fractional_ideal.mul_inv_cancel hJ, mul_one, mul_le],
intros x hx y hy,
rw [mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hJ] at hx,
exact hx y hy },
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm J⁻¹, fractional_ideal.mul_inv_cancel hJ, mul_one],
exact le_refl I
end
end fractional_ideal
/-- `is_dedekind_domain` and `is_dedekind_domain_inv` are equivalent ways
to express that an integral domain is a Dedekind domain. -/
theorem is_dedekind_domain_iff_is_dedekind_domain_inv :
is_dedekind_domain A ↔ is_dedekind_domain_inv A :=
⟨λ h I hI, by exactI fractional_ideal.mul_inv_cancel hI, λ h, h.is_dedekind_domain⟩
end inverse
section is_dedekind_domain
variables {R A} [is_dedekind_domain A] [algebra A K] [is_fraction_ring A K]
open fractional_ideal
open ideal
noncomputable instance fractional_ideal.semifield :
semifield (fractional_ideal A⁰ K) :=
{ inv := λ I, I⁻¹,
inv_zero := inv_zero' _,
div := (/),
div_eq_mul_inv := fractional_ideal.div_eq_mul_inv,
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, (coe_to_fractional_ideal_injective le_rfl).ne
(by simpa using @zero_ne_one (ideal A) _ _)⟩,
mul_inv_cancel := λ I, fractional_ideal.mul_inv_cancel,
.. fractional_ideal.comm_semiring }
/-- Fractional ideals have cancellative multiplication in a Dedekind domain.
Although this instance is a direct consequence of the instance
`fractional_ideal.comm_group_with_zero`, we define this instance to provide
a computable alternative.
-/
instance fractional_ideal.cancel_comm_monoid_with_zero :
cancel_comm_monoid_with_zero (fractional_ideal A⁰ K) :=
{ .. fractional_ideal.comm_semiring, -- Project out the computable fields first.
.. (by apply_instance : cancel_comm_monoid_with_zero (fractional_ideal A⁰ K)) }
instance ideal.cancel_comm_monoid_with_zero :
cancel_comm_monoid_with_zero (ideal A) :=
{ .. ideal.comm_semiring,
.. function.injective.cancel_comm_monoid_with_zero (coe_ideal_hom A⁰ (fraction_ring A))
coe_ideal_injective (ring_hom.map_zero _) (ring_hom.map_one _) (ring_hom.map_mul _)
(ring_hom.map_pow _) }
/-- For ideals in a Dedekind domain, to divide is to contain. -/
lemma ideal.dvd_iff_le {I J : ideal A} : (I ∣ J) ↔ J ≤ I :=
⟨ideal.le_of_dvd,
λ h, begin
by_cases hI : I = ⊥,
{ have hJ : J = ⊥, { rwa [hI, ← eq_bot_iff] at h },
rw [hI, hJ] },
have hI' : (I : fractional_ideal A⁰ (fraction_ring A)) ≠ 0 :=
(fractional_ideal.coe_to_fractional_ideal_ne_zero (le_refl (non_zero_divisors A))).mpr hI,
have : (I : fractional_ideal A⁰ (fraction_ring A))⁻¹ * J ≤ 1 := le_trans
(fractional_ideal.mul_left_mono (↑I)⁻¹ ((coe_ideal_le_coe_ideal _).mpr h))
(le_of_eq (inv_mul_cancel hI')),
obtain ⟨H, hH⟩ := fractional_ideal.le_one_iff_exists_coe_ideal.mp this,
use H,
refine coe_to_fractional_ideal_injective (le_refl (non_zero_divisors A))
(show (J : fractional_ideal A⁰ (fraction_ring A)) = _, from _),
rw [fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_mul, hH, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel hI', one_mul]
end⟩
lemma ideal.dvd_not_unit_iff_lt {I J : ideal A} :
dvd_not_unit I J ↔ J < I :=
⟨λ ⟨hI, H, hunit, hmul⟩, lt_of_le_of_ne (ideal.dvd_iff_le.mp ⟨H, hmul⟩)
(mt (λ h, have H = 1, from mul_left_cancel₀ hI (by rw [← hmul, h, mul_one]),
show is_unit H, from this.symm ▸ is_unit_one) hunit),
λ h, dvd_not_unit_of_dvd_of_not_dvd (ideal.dvd_iff_le.mpr (le_of_lt h))
(mt ideal.dvd_iff_le.mp (not_le_of_lt h))⟩
instance : wf_dvd_monoid (ideal A) :=
{ well_founded_dvd_not_unit :=
have well_founded ((>) : ideal A → ideal A → Prop) :=
is_noetherian_iff_well_founded.mp
(is_noetherian_ring_iff.mp is_dedekind_domain.is_noetherian_ring),
by { convert this, ext, rw ideal.dvd_not_unit_iff_lt } }
instance ideal.unique_factorization_monoid :
unique_factorization_monoid (ideal A) :=
{ irreducible_iff_prime := λ P,
⟨λ hirr, ⟨hirr.ne_zero, hirr.not_unit, λ I J, begin
have : P.is_maximal,
{ refine ⟨⟨mt ideal.is_unit_iff.mpr hirr.not_unit, _⟩⟩,
intros J hJ,
obtain ⟨J_ne, H, hunit, P_eq⟩ := ideal.dvd_not_unit_iff_lt.mpr hJ,
exact ideal.is_unit_iff.mp ((hirr.is_unit_or_is_unit P_eq).resolve_right hunit) },
rw [ideal.dvd_iff_le, ideal.dvd_iff_le, ideal.dvd_iff_le,
set_like.le_def, set_like.le_def, set_like.le_def],
contrapose!,
rintros ⟨⟨x, x_mem, x_not_mem⟩, ⟨y, y_mem, y_not_mem⟩⟩,
exact ⟨x * y, ideal.mul_mem_mul x_mem y_mem,
mt this.is_prime.mem_or_mem (not_or x_not_mem y_not_mem)⟩,
end⟩,
prime.irreducible⟩,
.. ideal.wf_dvd_monoid }
instance ideal.normalization_monoid : normalization_monoid (ideal A) :=
normalization_monoid_of_unique_units
@[simp] lemma ideal.dvd_span_singleton {I : ideal A} {x : A} :
I ∣ ideal.span {x} ↔ x ∈ I :=
ideal.dvd_iff_le.trans (ideal.span_le.trans set.singleton_subset_iff)
lemma ideal.is_prime_of_prime {P : ideal A} (h : prime P) : is_prime P :=
begin
refine ⟨_, λ x y hxy, _⟩,
{ unfreezingI { rintro rfl },
rw ← ideal.one_eq_top at h,
exact h.not_unit is_unit_one },
{ simp only [← ideal.dvd_span_singleton, ← ideal.span_singleton_mul_span_singleton] at ⊢ hxy,
exact h.dvd_or_dvd hxy }
end
theorem ideal.prime_of_is_prime {P : ideal A} (hP : P ≠ ⊥) (h : is_prime P) : prime P :=
begin
refine ⟨hP, mt ideal.is_unit_iff.mp h.ne_top, λ I J hIJ, _⟩,
simpa only [ideal.dvd_iff_le] using (h.mul_le.mp (ideal.le_of_dvd hIJ)),
end
/-- In a Dedekind domain, the (nonzero) prime elements of the monoid with zero `ideal A`
are exactly the prime ideals. -/
theorem ideal.prime_iff_is_prime {P : ideal A} (hP : P ≠ ⊥) :
prime P ↔ is_prime P :=
⟨ideal.is_prime_of_prime, ideal.prime_of_is_prime hP⟩
/-- In a Dedekind domain, the the prime ideals are the zero ideal together with the prime elements
of the monoid with zero `ideal A`. -/
theorem ideal.is_prime_iff_bot_or_prime {P : ideal A} :
is_prime P ↔ P = ⊥ ∨ prime P :=
⟨λ hp, (eq_or_ne P ⊥).imp_right $ λ hp0, (ideal.prime_of_is_prime hp0 hp),
λ hp, hp.elim (λ h, h.symm ▸ ideal.bot_prime) ideal.is_prime_of_prime⟩
lemma ideal.strict_anti_pow (I : ideal A) (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) (hI1 : I ≠ ⊤) :
strict_anti ((^) I : ℕ → ideal A) :=
strict_anti_nat_of_succ_lt $ λ e, ideal.dvd_not_unit_iff_lt.mp
⟨pow_ne_zero _ hI0, I, mt is_unit_iff.mp hI1, pow_succ' I e⟩
lemma ideal.pow_lt_self (I : ideal A) (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) (hI1 : I ≠ ⊤) (e : ℕ) (he : 2 ≤ e) : I^e < I :=
by convert I.strict_anti_pow hI0 hI1 he; rw pow_one
lemma ideal.exists_mem_pow_not_mem_pow_succ (I : ideal A) (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) (hI1 : I ≠ ⊤) (e : ℕ) :
∃ x ∈ I^e, x ∉ I^(e+1) :=
set_like.exists_of_lt (I.strict_anti_pow hI0 hI1 e.lt_succ_self)
lemma associates.le_singleton_iff (x : A) (n : ℕ) (I : ideal A) :
associates.mk I^n ≤ associates.mk (ideal.span {x}) ↔ x ∈ I^n :=
begin
rw [← associates.dvd_eq_le, ← associates.mk_pow, associates.mk_dvd_mk, ideal.dvd_span_singleton],
end
open fractional_ideal
variables {A K}
/-- Strengthening of `is_localization.exist_integer_multiples`:
Let `J ≠ ⊤` be an ideal in a Dedekind domain `A`, and `f ≠ 0` a finite collection
of elements of `K = Frac(A)`, then we can multiply the elements of `f` by some `a : K`
to find a collection of elements of `A` that is not completely contained in `J`. -/
lemma ideal.exist_integer_multiples_not_mem
{J : ideal A} (hJ : J ≠ ⊤) {ι : Type*} (s : finset ι) (f : ι → K)
{j} (hjs : j ∈ s) (hjf : f j ≠ 0) :
∃ a : K, (∀ i ∈ s, is_localization.is_integer A (a * f i)) ∧
∃ i ∈ s, (a * f i) ∉ (J : fractional_ideal A⁰ K) :=
begin
-- Consider the fractional ideal `I` spanned by the `f`s.
let I : fractional_ideal A⁰ K := fractional_ideal.span_finset A s f,
have hI0 : I ≠ 0 := fractional_ideal.span_finset_ne_zero.mpr ⟨j, hjs, hjf⟩,
-- We claim the multiplier `a` we're looking for is in `I⁻¹ \ (J / I)`.
suffices : ↑J / I < I⁻¹,
{ obtain ⟨_, a, hI, hpI⟩ := set_like.lt_iff_le_and_exists.mp this,
rw mem_inv_iff hI0 at hI,
refine ⟨a, λ i hi, _, _⟩,
-- By definition, `a ∈ I⁻¹` multiplies elements of `I` into elements of `1`,
-- in other words, `a * f i` is an integer.
{ exact (mem_one_iff _).mp (hI (f i)
(submodule.subset_span (set.mem_image_of_mem f hi))) },
{ contrapose! hpI,
-- And if all `a`-multiples of `I` are an element of `J`,
-- then `a` is actually an element of `J / I`, contradiction.
refine (mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hI0).mpr (λ y hy, submodule.span_induction hy _ _ _ _),
{ rintros _ ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩, exact hpI i hi },
{ rw mul_zero, exact submodule.zero_mem _ },
{ intros x y hx hy, rw mul_add, exact submodule.add_mem _ hx hy },
{ intros b x hx, rw mul_smul_comm, exact submodule.smul_mem _ b hx } } },
-- To show the inclusion of `J / I` into `I⁻¹ = 1 / I`, note that `J < I`.
calc ↑J / I = ↑J * I⁻¹ : div_eq_mul_inv ↑J I
... < 1 * I⁻¹ : mul_right_strict_mono (inv_ne_zero hI0) _
... = I⁻¹ : one_mul _,
{ rw [← coe_ideal_top],
-- And multiplying by `I⁻¹` is indeed strictly monotone.
exact strict_mono_of_le_iff_le (λ _ _, (coe_ideal_le_coe_ideal K).symm)
(lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr hJ) },
end
end is_dedekind_domain
section is_dedekind_domain
variables {T : Type*} [comm_ring T] [is_domain T] [is_dedekind_domain T] {I J : ideal T}
open_locale classical
open multiset unique_factorization_monoid ideal
lemma prod_normalized_factors_eq_self (hI : I ≠ ⊥) : (normalized_factors I).prod = I :=
associated_iff_eq.1 (normalized_factors_prod hI)
lemma count_le_of_ideal_ge {I J : ideal T} (h : I ≤ J) (hI : I ≠ ⊥) (K : ideal T) :
count K (normalized_factors J) ≤ count K (normalized_factors I) :=
le_iff_count.1 ((dvd_iff_normalized_factors_le_normalized_factors (ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hI h) hI).1
(dvd_iff_le.2 h)) _
lemma sup_eq_prod_inf_factors (hI : I ≠ ⊥) (hJ : J ≠ ⊥) :
I ⊔ J = (normalized_factors I ∩ normalized_factors J).prod :=
begin
have H : normalized_factors (normalized_factors I ∩ normalized_factors J).prod =
normalized_factors I ∩ normalized_factors J,
{ apply normalized_factors_prod_of_prime,
intros p hp,
rw mem_inter at hp,
exact prime_of_normalized_factor p hp.left },
have := (multiset.prod_ne_zero_of_prime (normalized_factors I ∩ normalized_factors J)
(λ _ h, prime_of_normalized_factor _ (multiset.mem_inter.1 h).1)),
apply le_antisymm,
{ rw [sup_le_iff, ← dvd_iff_le, ← dvd_iff_le],
split,
{ rw [dvd_iff_normalized_factors_le_normalized_factors this hI, H],
exact inf_le_left },
{ rw [dvd_iff_normalized_factors_le_normalized_factors this hJ, H],
exact inf_le_right } },
{ rw [← dvd_iff_le, dvd_iff_normalized_factors_le_normalized_factors,
normalized_factors_prod_of_prime, le_iff_count],
{ intro a,
rw multiset.count_inter,
exact le_min (count_le_of_ideal_ge le_sup_left hI a)
(count_le_of_ideal_ge le_sup_right hJ a) },
{ intros p hp,
rw mem_inter at hp,
exact prime_of_normalized_factor p hp.left },
{ exact ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hI le_sup_left },
{ exact this } },
end
lemma irreducible_pow_sup (hI : I ≠ ⊥) (hJ : irreducible J) (n : ℕ) :
J^n ⊔ I = J^(min ((normalized_factors I).count J) n) :=
by rw [sup_eq_prod_inf_factors (pow_ne_zero n hJ.ne_zero) hI, ← inf_eq_inter,
normalized_factors_of_irreducible_pow hJ, normalize_eq J, repeat_inf, prod_repeat]
lemma irreducible_pow_sup_of_le (hJ : irreducible J) (n : ℕ)
(hn : ↑n ≤ multiplicity J I) : J^n ⊔ I = J^n :=
begin
by_cases hI : I = ⊥,
{ simp [*] at *, },
rw [irreducible_pow_sup hI hJ, min_eq_right],
rwa [multiplicity_eq_count_normalized_factors hJ hI, part_enat.coe_le_coe, normalize_eq J] at hn
end
lemma irreducible_pow_sup_of_ge (hI : I ≠ ⊥) (hJ : irreducible J) (n : ℕ)
(hn : multiplicity J I ≤ n) : J^n ⊔ I = J ^ (multiplicity J I).get (part_enat.dom_of_le_coe hn) :=
begin
rw [irreducible_pow_sup hI hJ, min_eq_left],
congr,
{ rw [← part_enat.coe_inj, part_enat.coe_get, multiplicity_eq_count_normalized_factors hJ hI,
normalize_eq J] },
{ rwa [multiplicity_eq_count_normalized_factors hJ hI, part_enat.coe_le_coe, normalize_eq J]
at hn }
end
end is_dedekind_domain
section height_one_spectrum
/-!
### Height one spectrum of a Dedekind domain
If `R` is a Dedekind domain of Krull dimension 1, the maximal ideals of `R` are exactly its nonzero
prime ideals.
We define `height_one_spectrum` and provide lemmas to recover the facts that prime ideals of height
one are prime and irreducible. -/
namespace is_dedekind_domain
variables [is_domain R] [is_dedekind_domain R]
/-- The height one prime spectrum of a Dedekind domain `R` is the type of nonzero prime ideals of
`R`. Note that this equals the maximal spectrum if `R` has Krull dimension 1. -/
@[ext, nolint has_nonempty_instance unused_arguments]
structure height_one_spectrum :=
(as_ideal : ideal R)
(is_prime : as_ideal.is_prime)
(ne_bot : as_ideal ≠ ⊥)
variables (v : height_one_spectrum R) {R}
lemma height_one_spectrum.prime (v : height_one_spectrum R) : prime v.as_ideal :=
ideal.prime_of_is_prime v.ne_bot v.is_prime
lemma height_one_spectrum.irreducible (v : height_one_spectrum R) :
irreducible v.as_ideal :=
begin
rw [unique_factorization_monoid.irreducible_iff_prime],
apply v.prime,
end
lemma height_one_spectrum.associates_irreducible (v : height_one_spectrum R) :
irreducible (associates.mk v.as_ideal) :=
begin
rw [associates.irreducible_mk _],
apply v.irreducible,
end
end is_dedekind_domain
end height_one_spectrum
section
open ideal
variables {R} {A} [is_dedekind_domain A] {I : ideal R} {J : ideal A}
/-- The map from ideals of `R` dividing `I` to the ideals of `A` dividing `J` induced by
a homomorphism `f : R/I →+* A/J` -/
@[simps]
def ideal_factors_fun_of_quot_hom {f : R ⧸ I →+* A ⧸ J} (hf : function.surjective f ) :
{p : ideal R | p ∣ I} →o {p : ideal A | p ∣ J} :=
{ to_fun := λ X, ⟨comap J^.quotient.mk (map f (map I^.quotient.mk X)),
begin
have : (J^.quotient.mk).ker ≤ comap J^.quotient.mk (map f (map I^.quotient.mk X)),
{ exact ker_le_comap J^.quotient.mk },
rw mk_ker at this,
exact dvd_iff_le.mpr this,
end ⟩,
monotone' :=
begin
rintros ⟨X, hX⟩ ⟨Y, hY⟩ h,
rw [← subtype.coe_le_coe, subtype.coe_mk, subtype.coe_mk] at h ⊢,
rw [subtype.coe_mk, comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective J^.quotient.mk quotient.mk_surjective,
map_le_iff_le_comap, subtype.coe_mk, comap_map_of_surjective _ hf (map I^.quotient.mk Y)],
suffices : map I^.quotient.mk X ≤ map I^.quotient.mk Y,
{ exact le_sup_of_le_left this },
rwa [map_le_iff_le_comap, comap_map_of_surjective I^.quotient.mk quotient.mk_surjective,
← ring_hom.ker_eq_comap_bot, mk_ker, sup_eq_left.mpr $ le_of_dvd hY],
end }
@[simp]
lemma ideal_factors_fun_of_quot_hom_id :
ideal_factors_fun_of_quot_hom (ring_hom.id (A ⧸ J)).is_surjective = order_hom.id :=
order_hom.ext _ _ (funext $ λ X, by simp only [ideal_factors_fun_of_quot_hom, map_id,
order_hom.coe_fun_mk, order_hom.id_coe, id.def, comap_map_of_surjective J^.quotient.mk
quotient.mk_surjective, ← ring_hom.ker_eq_comap_bot J^.quotient.mk, mk_ker, sup_eq_left.mpr
(dvd_iff_le.mp X.prop), subtype.coe_eta] )
variables {B : Type*} [comm_ring B] [is_domain B] [is_dedekind_domain B] {L : ideal B}
lemma ideal_factors_fun_of_quot_hom_comp {f : R ⧸ I →+* A ⧸ J} {g : A ⧸ J →+* B ⧸ L}
(hf : function.surjective f) (hg : function.surjective g) :
(ideal_factors_fun_of_quot_hom hg).comp (ideal_factors_fun_of_quot_hom hf)
= ideal_factors_fun_of_quot_hom (show function.surjective (g.comp f), from hg.comp hf) :=
begin
refine order_hom.ext _ _ (funext $ λ x, _),
rw [ideal_factors_fun_of_quot_hom, ideal_factors_fun_of_quot_hom, order_hom.comp_coe,
order_hom.coe_fun_mk, order_hom.coe_fun_mk, function.comp_app,
ideal_factors_fun_of_quot_hom, order_hom.coe_fun_mk, subtype.mk_eq_mk, subtype.coe_mk,
map_comap_of_surjective J^.quotient.mk quotient.mk_surjective, map_map],
end
variables [is_domain R] [is_dedekind_domain R] (f : R ⧸ I ≃+* A ⧸ J)
/-- The bijection between ideals of `R` dividing `I` and the ideals of `A` dividing `J` induced by
an isomorphism `f : R/I ≅ A/J`. -/
@[simps]
def ideal_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv : {p : ideal R | p ∣ I} ≃o {p : ideal A | p ∣ J} :=
order_iso.of_hom_inv
(ideal_factors_fun_of_quot_hom (show function.surjective
(f : R ⧸I →+* A ⧸ J), from f.surjective))
(ideal_factors_fun_of_quot_hom (show function.surjective
(f.symm : A ⧸J →+* R ⧸ I), from f.symm.surjective))
(by simp only [← ideal_factors_fun_of_quot_hom_id, order_hom.coe_eq, order_hom.coe_eq,
ideal_factors_fun_of_quot_hom_comp, ← ring_equiv.to_ring_hom_eq_coe,
← ring_equiv.to_ring_hom_eq_coe, ← ring_equiv.to_ring_hom_trans, ring_equiv.symm_trans_self,
ring_equiv.to_ring_hom_refl])
(by simp only [← ideal_factors_fun_of_quot_hom_id, order_hom.coe_eq, order_hom.coe_eq,
ideal_factors_fun_of_quot_hom_comp, ← ring_equiv.to_ring_hom_eq_coe,
← ring_equiv.to_ring_hom_eq_coe, ← ring_equiv.to_ring_hom_trans, ring_equiv.self_trans_symm,
ring_equiv.to_ring_hom_refl])
lemma ideal_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv_symm :
(ideal_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv f).symm = ideal_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv f.symm := rfl
lemma ideal_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv_is_dvd_iso {L M : ideal R} (hL : L ∣ I) (hM : M ∣ I) :
(ideal_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv f ⟨L, hL⟩ : ideal A) ∣
ideal_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv f ⟨M, hM⟩ ↔ L ∣ M :=
begin
suffices : ideal_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv f ⟨M, hM⟩ ≤
ideal_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv f ⟨L, hL⟩ ↔ (⟨M, hM⟩ : {p : ideal R | p ∣ I}) ≤ ⟨L, hL⟩,
{ rw [dvd_iff_le, dvd_iff_le, subtype.coe_le_coe, this, subtype.mk_le_mk] },
exact (ideal_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv f).le_iff_le,
end
open unique_factorization_monoid
variables [decidable_eq (ideal R)] [decidable_eq (ideal A)]
lemma ideal_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv_mem_normalized_factors_of_mem_normalized_factors
(hJ : J ≠ ⊥) {L : ideal R} (hL : L ∈ normalized_factors I) :
↑(ideal_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv f
⟨L, dvd_of_mem_normalized_factors hL⟩) ∈ normalized_factors J :=
begin
by_cases hI : I = ⊥,
{ exfalso,
rw [hI, bot_eq_zero, normalized_factors_zero, ← multiset.empty_eq_zero] at hL,
exact hL, },
{ apply mem_normalized_factors_factor_dvd_iso_of_mem_normalized_factors hI hJ hL _,
rintros ⟨l, hl⟩ ⟨l', hl'⟩,
rw [subtype.coe_mk, subtype.coe_mk],
apply ideal_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv_is_dvd_iso f }
end
/-- The bijection between the sets of normalized factors of I and J induced by a ring
isomorphism `f : R/I ≅ A/J`. -/
@[simps apply]
def normalized_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv (hI : I ≠ ⊥) (hJ : J ≠ ⊥) :
{L : ideal R | L ∈ normalized_factors I } ≃ {M : ideal A | M ∈ normalized_factors J } :=
{ to_fun := λ j, ⟨ideal_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv f ⟨↑j, dvd_of_mem_normalized_factors j.prop⟩,
ideal_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv_mem_normalized_factors_of_mem_normalized_factors f hJ j.prop⟩,
inv_fun := λ j, ⟨(ideal_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv f).symm
⟨↑j, dvd_of_mem_normalized_factors j.prop⟩, by { rw ideal_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv_symm,
exact ideal_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv_mem_normalized_factors_of_mem_normalized_factors
f.symm hI j.prop} ⟩,
left_inv := λ ⟨j, hj⟩, by simp,
right_inv := λ ⟨j, hj⟩, by simp }
@[simp]
lemma normalized_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv_symm (hI : I ≠ ⊥) (hJ : J ≠ ⊥) :
(normalized_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv f hI hJ).symm =
normalized_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv f.symm hJ hI :=
rfl
variable [decidable_rel ((∣) : ideal R → ideal R → Prop)]
variable [decidable_rel ((∣) : ideal A → ideal A → Prop)]
/-- The map `normalized_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv` preserves multiplicities. -/
lemma normalized_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv_multiplicity_eq_multiplicity (hI : I ≠ ⊥) (hJ : J ≠ ⊥)
(L : ideal R) (hL : L ∈ normalized_factors I) :
multiplicity ↑(normalized_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv f hI hJ ⟨L, hL⟩) J = multiplicity L I :=
begin
rw [normalized_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv, equiv.coe_fn_mk, subtype.coe_mk],
exact multiplicity_factor_dvd_iso_eq_multiplicity_of_mem_normalized_factor hI hJ hL
(λ ⟨l, hl⟩ ⟨l', hl'⟩, ideal_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv_is_dvd_iso f hl hl'),
end
end
section chinese_remainder
open ideal unique_factorization_monoid
open_locale big_operators
variables {R}
lemma ring.dimension_le_one.prime_le_prime_iff_eq (h : ring.dimension_le_one R)
{P Q : ideal R} [hP : P.is_prime] [hQ : Q.is_prime] (hP0 : P ≠ ⊥) :
P ≤ Q ↔ P = Q :=
⟨(h P hP0 hP).eq_of_le hQ.ne_top, eq.le⟩
lemma ideal.coprime_of_no_prime_ge {I J : ideal R} (h : ∀ P, I ≤ P → J ≤ P → ¬ is_prime P) :
I ⊔ J = ⊤ :=
begin
by_contra hIJ,
obtain ⟨P, hP, hIJ⟩ := ideal.exists_le_maximal _ hIJ,
exact h P (le_trans le_sup_left hIJ) (le_trans le_sup_right hIJ) hP.is_prime
end
section dedekind_domain
variables {R} [is_domain R] [is_dedekind_domain R]
lemma ideal.is_prime.mul_mem_pow (I : ideal R) [hI : I.is_prime] {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
(h : a * b ∈ I^n) : a ∈ I ∨ b ∈ I^n :=
begin
cases n, { simp },
by_cases hI0 : I = ⊥, { simpa [pow_succ, hI0] using h },
simp only [← submodule.span_singleton_le_iff_mem, ideal.submodule_span_eq, ← ideal.dvd_iff_le,
← ideal.span_singleton_mul_span_singleton] at h ⊢,
by_cases ha : I ∣ span {a},
{ exact or.inl ha },
rw mul_comm at h,
exact or.inr (prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_right ((ideal.prime_iff_is_prime hI0).mpr hI) _ ha h),
end
section
open_locale classical
lemma ideal.count_normalized_factors_eq {p x : ideal R} [hp : p.is_prime] {n : ℕ}
(hle : x ≤ p^n) (hlt : ¬ (x ≤ p^(n+1))) :
(normalized_factors x).count p = n :=
count_normalized_factors_eq'
((ideal.is_prime_iff_bot_or_prime.mp hp).imp_right prime.irreducible)
(by { haveI : unique (ideal R)ˣ := ideal.unique_units, apply normalize_eq })
(by convert ideal.dvd_iff_le.mpr hle) (by convert mt ideal.le_of_dvd hlt)
/- Warning: even though a pure term-mode proof typechecks (the `by convert` can simply be
removed), it's slower to the point of a possible timeout. -/
end
lemma ideal.le_mul_of_no_prime_factors
{I J K : ideal R} (coprime : ∀ P, J ≤ P → K ≤ P → ¬ is_prime P) (hJ : I ≤ J) (hK : I ≤ K) :
I ≤ J * K :=
begin
simp only [← ideal.dvd_iff_le] at coprime hJ hK ⊢,
by_cases hJ0 : J = 0,
{ simpa only [hJ0, zero_mul] using hJ },
obtain ⟨I', rfl⟩ := hK,
rw mul_comm,
exact mul_dvd_mul_left K
(unique_factorization_monoid.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right_of_no_prime_factors hJ0
(λ P hPJ hPK, mt ideal.is_prime_of_prime (coprime P hPJ hPK))
hJ)
end
lemma ideal.le_of_pow_le_prime {I P : ideal R} [hP : P.is_prime] {n : ℕ} (h : I^n ≤ P) : I ≤ P :=
begin
by_cases hP0 : P = ⊥,
{ simp only [hP0, le_bot_iff] at ⊢ h,
exact pow_eq_zero h },
rw ← ideal.dvd_iff_le at ⊢ h,
exact ((ideal.prime_iff_is_prime hP0).mpr hP).dvd_of_dvd_pow h
end
lemma ideal.pow_le_prime_iff {I P : ideal R} [hP : P.is_prime] {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
I^n ≤ P ↔ I ≤ P :=
⟨ideal.le_of_pow_le_prime, λ h, trans (ideal.pow_le_self hn) h⟩
lemma ideal.prod_le_prime {ι : Type*} {s : finset ι} {f : ι → ideal R} {P : ideal R}
[hP : P.is_prime] :
∏ i in s, f i ≤ P ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, f i ≤ P :=
begin
by_cases hP0 : P = ⊥,
{ simp only [hP0, le_bot_iff],
rw [← ideal.zero_eq_bot, finset.prod_eq_zero_iff] },
simp only [← ideal.dvd_iff_le],
exact ((ideal.prime_iff_is_prime hP0).mpr hP).dvd_finset_prod_iff _
end
/-- The intersection of distinct prime powers in a Dedekind domain is the product of these
prime powers. -/
lemma is_dedekind_domain.inf_prime_pow_eq_prod {ι : Type*}
(s : finset ι) (f : ι → ideal R) (e : ι → ℕ)
(prime : ∀ i ∈ s, prime (f i)) (coprime : ∀ i j ∈ s, i ≠ j → f i ≠ f j) :
s.inf (λ i, f i ^ e i) = ∏ i in s, f i ^ e i :=
begin
letI := classical.dec_eq ι,
revert prime coprime,
refine s.induction _ _,
{ simp },
intros a s ha ih prime coprime,
specialize ih (λ i hi, prime i (finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi))
(λ i hi j hj, coprime i (finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi) j (finset.mem_insert_of_mem hj)),
rw [finset.inf_insert, finset.prod_insert ha, ih],
refine le_antisymm (ideal.le_mul_of_no_prime_factors _ inf_le_left inf_le_right) ideal.mul_le_inf,
intros P hPa hPs hPp,
haveI := hPp,
obtain ⟨b, hb, hPb⟩ := ideal.prod_le_prime.mp hPs,
haveI := ideal.is_prime_of_prime (prime a (finset.mem_insert_self a s)),
haveI := ideal.is_prime_of_prime (prime b (finset.mem_insert_of_mem hb)),
refine coprime a (finset.mem_insert_self a s) b (finset.mem_insert_of_mem hb) _
(((is_dedekind_domain.dimension_le_one.prime_le_prime_iff_eq _).mp
(ideal.le_of_pow_le_prime hPa)).trans
((is_dedekind_domain.dimension_le_one.prime_le_prime_iff_eq _).mp
(ideal.le_of_pow_le_prime hPb)).symm),
{ unfreezingI { rintro rfl }, contradiction },
{ exact (prime a (finset.mem_insert_self a s)).ne_zero },
{ exact (prime b (finset.mem_insert_of_mem hb)).ne_zero },
end
/-- **Chinese remainder theorem** for a Dedekind domain: if the ideal `I` factors as
`∏ i, P i ^ e i`, then `R ⧸ I` factors as `Π i, R ⧸ (P i ^ e i)`. -/
noncomputable def is_dedekind_domain.quotient_equiv_pi_of_prod_eq {ι : Type*} [fintype ι]
(I : ideal R) (P : ι → ideal R) (e : ι → ℕ)
(prime : ∀ i, prime (P i)) (coprime : ∀ i j, i ≠ j → P i ≠ P j) (prod_eq : (∏ i, P i ^ e i) = I) :
R ⧸ I ≃+* Π i, R ⧸ (P i ^ e i) :=
(ideal.quot_equiv_of_eq (by { simp only [← prod_eq, finset.inf_eq_infi, finset.mem_univ, cinfi_pos,
← is_dedekind_domain.inf_prime_pow_eq_prod _ _ _ (λ i _, prime i) (λ i _ j _, coprime i j)] }))
.trans $
ideal.quotient_inf_ring_equiv_pi_quotient _ (λ i j hij, ideal.coprime_of_no_prime_ge (begin
intros P hPi hPj hPp,
haveI := hPp,
haveI := ideal.is_prime_of_prime (prime i), haveI := ideal.is_prime_of_prime (prime j),
exact coprime i j hij
(((is_dedekind_domain.dimension_le_one.prime_le_prime_iff_eq (prime i).ne_zero).mp
(ideal.le_of_pow_le_prime hPi)).trans
((is_dedekind_domain.dimension_le_one.prime_le_prime_iff_eq (prime j).ne_zero).mp
(ideal.le_of_pow_le_prime hPj)).symm)
end))
open_locale classical
/-- **Chinese remainder theorem** for a Dedekind domain: `R ⧸ I` factors as `Π i, R ⧸ (P i ^ e i)`,
where `P i` ranges over the prime factors of `I` and `e i` over the multiplicities. -/
noncomputable def is_dedekind_domain.quotient_equiv_pi_factors {I : ideal R} (hI : I ≠ ⊥) :
R ⧸ I ≃+* Π (P : (factors I).to_finset), R ⧸ ((P : ideal R) ^ (factors I).count P) :=
is_dedekind_domain.quotient_equiv_pi_of_prod_eq _ _ _
(λ (P : (factors I).to_finset), prime_of_factor _ (multiset.mem_to_finset.mp P.prop))
(λ i j hij, subtype.coe_injective.ne hij)
(calc ∏ (P : (factors I).to_finset), (P : ideal R) ^ (factors I).count (P : ideal R)
= ∏ P in (factors I).to_finset, P ^ (factors I).count P
: (factors I).to_finset.prod_coe_sort (λ P, P ^ (factors I).count P)
... = ((factors I).map (λ P, P)).prod : (finset.prod_multiset_map_count (factors I) id).symm
... = (factors I).prod : by rw multiset.map_id'
... = I : (@associated_iff_eq (ideal R) _ ideal.unique_units _ _).mp (factors_prod hI))
@[simp] lemma is_dedekind_domain.quotient_equiv_pi_factors_mk {I : ideal R} (hI : I ≠ ⊥)
(x : R) : is_dedekind_domain.quotient_equiv_pi_factors hI (ideal.quotient.mk I x) =
λ P, ideal.quotient.mk _ x :=
rfl
end dedekind_domain
end chinese_remainder
section PID
open multiplicity unique_factorization_monoid ideal
variables {R} [is_domain R] [is_principal_ideal_ring R]
lemma span_singleton_dvd_span_singleton_iff_dvd {a b : R} :
(ideal.span {a}) ∣ (ideal.span ({b} : set R)) ↔ a ∣ b :=
⟨λ h, mem_span_singleton.mp (dvd_iff_le.mp h (mem_span_singleton.mpr (dvd_refl b))),
λ h, dvd_iff_le.mpr (λ d hd, mem_span_singleton.mpr (dvd_trans h (mem_span_singleton.mp hd)))⟩
lemma singleton_span_mem_normalized_factors_of_mem_normalized_factors [normalization_monoid R]
[decidable_eq R] [decidable_eq (ideal R)] {a b : R} (ha : a ∈ normalized_factors b) :
ideal.span ({a} : set R) ∈ normalized_factors (ideal.span ({b} : set R)) :=
begin
by_cases hb : b = 0,
{ rw [ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot.mpr hb, bot_eq_zero, normalized_factors_zero],
rw [hb, normalized_factors_zero] at ha,
simpa only [multiset.not_mem_zero] },
{ suffices : prime (ideal.span ({a} : set R)),
{ obtain ⟨c, hc, hc'⟩ := exists_mem_normalized_factors_of_dvd _ this.irreducible
(dvd_iff_le.mpr (span_singleton_le_span_singleton.mpr (dvd_of_mem_normalized_factors ha))),
rwa associated_iff_eq.mp hc',
{ by_contra,
exact hb (span_singleton_eq_bot.mp h) } },
rw prime_iff_is_prime,
exact (span_singleton_prime (prime_of_normalized_factor a ha).ne_zero).mpr
(prime_of_normalized_factor a ha),
by_contra,
exact (prime_of_normalized_factor a ha).ne_zero (span_singleton_eq_bot.mp h) },
end
lemma multiplicity_eq_multiplicity_span [decidable_rel ((∣) : R → R → Prop)]
[decidable_rel ((∣) : ideal R → ideal R → Prop)] {a b : R} :
multiplicity (ideal.span {a}) (ideal.span ({b} : set R)) = multiplicity a b :=
begin
by_cases h : finite a b,
{ rw ← part_enat.coe_get (finite_iff_dom.mp h),
refine (multiplicity.unique
(show (ideal.span {a})^(((multiplicity a b).get h)) ∣ (ideal.span {b}), from _) _).symm ;
rw [ideal.span_singleton_pow, span_singleton_dvd_span_singleton_iff_dvd],
exact pow_multiplicity_dvd h ,
{ exact multiplicity.is_greatest ((part_enat.lt_coe_iff _ _).mpr (exists.intro
(finite_iff_dom.mp h) (nat.lt_succ_self _))) } },
{ suffices : ¬ (finite (ideal.span ({a} : set R)) (ideal.span ({b} : set R))),
{ rw [finite_iff_dom, part_enat.not_dom_iff_eq_top] at h this,
rw [h, this] },
refine not_finite_iff_forall.mpr (λ n, by {rw [ideal.span_singleton_pow,
span_singleton_dvd_span_singleton_iff_dvd], exact not_finite_iff_forall.mp h n }) }
end
variables [decidable_eq R] [decidable_eq (ideal R)] [normalization_monoid R]
/-- The bijection between the (normalized) prime factors of `r` and the (normalized) prime factors
of `span {r}` -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def normalized_factors_equiv_span_normalized_factors {r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
{d : R | d ∈ normalized_factors r} ≃
{I : ideal R | I ∈ normalized_factors (ideal.span ({r} : set R))} :=
equiv.of_bijective
(λ d, ⟨ideal.span {↑d}, singleton_span_mem_normalized_factors_of_mem_normalized_factors d.prop⟩)
begin
split,
{ rintros ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩ h,
rw [subtype.mk_eq_mk, ideal.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton, subtype.coe_mk,
subtype.coe_mk] at h,
exact subtype.mk_eq_mk.mpr (mem_normalized_factors_eq_of_associated ha hb h) },
{ rintros ⟨i, hi⟩,
letI : i.is_principal := infer_instance,
letI : i.is_prime := is_prime_of_prime (prime_of_normalized_factor i hi),
obtain ⟨a, ha, ha'⟩ := exists_mem_normalized_factors_of_dvd hr
(submodule.is_principal.prime_generator_of_is_prime i
(prime_of_normalized_factor i hi).ne_zero).irreducible _,
{ use ⟨a, ha⟩,
simp only [subtype.coe_mk, subtype.mk_eq_mk, ← span_singleton_eq_span_singleton.mpr ha',
ideal.span_singleton_generator] },
{exact (submodule.is_principal.mem_iff_generator_dvd i).mp (((show ideal.span {r} ≤ i, from
dvd_iff_le.mp (dvd_of_mem_normalized_factors hi))) (mem_span_singleton.mpr (dvd_refl r))) } }
end
variables [decidable_rel ((∣) : R → R → Prop)] [decidable_rel ((∣) : ideal R → ideal R → Prop)]
/-- The bijection `normalized_factors_equiv_span_normalized_factors` between the set of prime
factors of `r` and the set of prime factors of the ideal `⟨r⟩` preserves multiplicities. -/
lemma multiplicity_normalized_factors_equiv_span_normalized_factors_eq_multiplicity {r d: R}
(hr : r ≠ 0) (hd : d ∈ normalized_factors r) :
multiplicity d r =
multiplicity (normalized_factors_equiv_span_normalized_factors hr ⟨d, hd⟩ : ideal R)
(ideal.span {r}) :=
by simp only [normalized_factors_equiv_span_normalized_factors, multiplicity_eq_multiplicity_span,
subtype.coe_mk, equiv.of_bijective_apply]
/-- The bijection `normalized_factors_equiv_span_normalized_factors.symm` between the set of prime
factors of the ideal `⟨r⟩` and the set of prime factors of `r` preserves multiplicities. -/
lemma multiplicity_normalized_factors_equiv_span_normalized_factors_symm_eq_multiplicity
{r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) (I : {I : ideal R | I ∈ normalized_factors (ideal.span ({r} : set R))}) :
multiplicity ((normalized_factors_equiv_span_normalized_factors hr).symm I : R) r =
multiplicity (I : ideal R) (ideal.span {r}) :=
begin
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := (normalized_factors_equiv_span_normalized_factors hr).surjective I,
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := x,
rw [hx.symm, equiv.symm_apply_apply, subtype.coe_mk,
multiplicity_normalized_factors_equiv_span_normalized_factors_eq_multiplicity hr ha, hx],
end
end PID
|
b71b22eeed197db05013044c73a3d2be8880b2a6 | 624f6f2ae8b3b1adc5f8f67a365c51d5126be45a | /src/Init/Lean/Scopes.lean | ca2cda91a4cd76f5da16b95d876e8885af7cd8c3 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | mhuisi/lean4 | 28d35a4febc2e251c7f05492e13f3b05d6f9b7af | dda44bc47f3e5d024508060dac2bcb59fd12e4c0 | refs/heads/master | 1,621,225,489,283 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 250,590,438 | 0 | 2 | Apache-2.0 | 1,602,443,220,000 | 1,585,327,814,000 | C | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,715 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Lean.Environment
namespace Lean
/- Scope management
TODO: delete after we delete parser implemented in C++.
We have decided to store scope information at ElabState
-/
structure ScopeManagerState :=
(allNamespaces : NameSet := {})
/- Stack of namespaces for each each open namespace and section -/
(namespaces : List Name := [])
/- Stack of namespace/section headers -/
(headers : List Name := [])
(isNamespace : List Bool := [])
namespace ScopeManagerState
instance : Inhabited ScopeManagerState := ⟨{}⟩
def saveNamespace (s : ScopeManagerState) (n : Name) : ScopeManagerState :=
{ allNamespaces := s.allNamespaces.insert n, .. s }
end ScopeManagerState
def regScopeManagerExtension : IO (SimplePersistentEnvExtension Name ScopeManagerState) :=
registerSimplePersistentEnvExtension {
name := `scopes,
addImportedFn := fun as => mkStateFromImportedEntries ScopeManagerState.saveNamespace {} as,
addEntryFn := fun s n => { allNamespaces := s.allNamespaces.insert n, .. s },
}
@[init regScopeManagerExtension]
constant scopeManagerExt : SimplePersistentEnvExtension Name ScopeManagerState := arbitrary _
namespace Environment
@[export lean_get_namespaces]
def getNamespaces (env : Environment) : List Name :=
(scopeManagerExt.getState env).namespaces
def getNamespaceSet (env : Environment) : NameSet :=
(scopeManagerExt.getState env).allNamespaces
@[export lean_is_namespace]
def isNamespace (env : Environment) (n : Name) : Bool :=
env.getNamespaceSet.contains n
@[export lean_in_section]
def inSection (env : Environment) : Bool :=
match (scopeManagerExt.getState env).isNamespace with
| (b::_) => !b
| _ => false
@[export lean_has_open_scopes]
def hasOpenScopes (env : Environment) : Bool :=
!env.getNamespaces.isEmpty
@[export lean_get_namespace]
def getNamespace (env : Environment) : Name :=
match env.getNamespaces with
| (n::_) => n
| _ => Name.anonymous
@[export lean_get_scope_header]
def getScopeHeader (env : Environment) : Name :=
match (scopeManagerExt.getState env).headers with
| (n::_) => n
| _ => Name.anonymous
@[export lean_to_valid_namespace]
def toValidNamespace (env : Environment) (n : Name) : Option Name :=
let s := scopeManagerExt.getState env;
if s.allNamespaces.contains n then some n
else s.namespaces.foldl
(fun r ns => match r with
| some _ => r
| none =>
let c := ns ++ n;
if s.allNamespaces.contains c then some c else none)
none
def registerNamespaceAux (env : Environment) (n : Name) : Environment :=
if env.getNamespaceSet.contains n then env else scopeManagerExt.addEntry env n
@[export lean_register_namespace]
def registerNamespace : Environment → Name → Environment
| env, n@(Name.str p _ _) => registerNamespace (registerNamespaceAux env n) p
| env, _ => env
def pushScopeCore (env : Environment) (header : Name) (isNamespace : Bool) : Environment :=
let ns := env.getNamespace;
let newNs := if isNamespace then ns ++ header else ns;
let env := env.registerNamespaceAux newNs;
let env := scopeManagerExt.modifyState env $ fun s =>
{ headers := header :: s.headers,
namespaces := newNs :: s.namespaces,
isNamespace := isNamespace :: s.isNamespace,
.. s };
env
def popScopeCore (env : Environment) : Environment :=
if env.getNamespaces.isEmpty then env
else scopeManagerExt.modifyState env $ fun s =>
{ headers := s.headers.tail!,
namespaces := s.namespaces.tail!,
isNamespace := s.isNamespace.tail!,
.. s }
end Environment
end Lean
|
a0778929bbc3bfad771c9a380ab3f4622ea4f551 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/topology/sheaves/skyscraper.lean | c02f854b23030058b7e6a50d4914f14ff07c3e74 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 17,736 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jujian Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jujian Zhang, Junyan Xu
-/
import topology.sheaves.punit
import topology.sheaves.stalks
import topology.sheaves.functors
/-!
# Skyscraper (pre)sheaves
A skyscraper (pre)sheaf `𝓕 : (pre)sheaf C X` is the (pre)sheaf with value `A` at point `p₀` that is
supported only at open sets contain `p₀`, i.e. `𝓕(U) = A` if `p₀ ∈ U` and `𝓕(U) = *` if `p₀ ∉ U`
where `*` is a terminal object of `C`. In terms of stalks, `𝓕` is supported at all specializations
of `p₀`, i.e. if `p₀ ⤳ x` then `𝓕ₓ ≅ A` and if `¬ p₀ ⤳ x` then `𝓕ₓ ≅ *`.
## Main definitions
* `skyscraper_presheaf`: `skyscraper_presheaf p₀ A` is the skyscraper presheaf at point `p₀` with
value `A`.
* `skyscraper_sheaf`: the skyscraper presheaf satisfies the sheaf condition.
## Main statements
* `skyscraper_presheaf_stalk_of_specializes`: if `y ∈ closure {p₀}` then the stalk of
`skyscraper_presheaf p₀ A` at `y` is `A`.
* `skyscraper_presheaf_stalk_of_not_specializes`: if `y ∉ closure {p₀}` then the stalk of
`skyscraper_presheaf p₀ A` at `y` is `*` the terminal object.
TODO: generalize universe level when calculating stalks, after generalizing universe level of stalk.
-/
noncomputable theory
open topological_space Top category_theory category_theory.limits opposite
universes u v w
variables {X : Top.{u}} (p₀ : X) [Π (U : opens X), decidable (p₀ ∈ U)]
section
variables {C : Type v} [category.{w} C] [has_terminal C] (A : C)
/--
A skyscraper presheaf is a presheaf supported at a single point: if `p₀ ∈ X` is a specified
point, then the skyscraper presheaf `𝓕` with value `A` is defined by `U ↦ A` if `p₀ ∈ U` and
`U ↦ *` if `p₀ ∉ A` where `*` is some terminal object.
-/
@[simps] def skyscraper_presheaf : presheaf C X :=
{ obj := λ U, if p₀ ∈ unop U then A else terminal C,
map := λ U V i, if h : p₀ ∈ unop V
then eq_to_hom $ by erw [if_pos h, if_pos (le_of_hom i.unop h)]
else ((if_neg h).symm.rec terminal_is_terminal).from _,
map_id' := λ U, (em (p₀ ∈ U.unop)).elim (λ h, dif_pos h)
(λ h, ((if_neg h).symm.rec terminal_is_terminal).hom_ext _ _),
map_comp' := λ U V W iVU iWV,
begin
by_cases hW : p₀ ∈ unop W,
{ have hV : p₀ ∈ unop V := le_of_hom iWV.unop hW,
simp only [dif_pos hW, dif_pos hV, eq_to_hom_trans] },
{ rw [dif_neg hW], apply ((if_neg hW).symm.rec terminal_is_terminal).hom_ext }
end }
lemma skyscraper_presheaf_eq_pushforward
[hd : Π (U : opens (Top.of punit.{u+1})), decidable (punit.star ∈ U)] :
skyscraper_presheaf p₀ A =
continuous_map.const (Top.of punit) p₀ _* skyscraper_presheaf punit.star A :=
by convert_to @skyscraper_presheaf X p₀
(λ U, hd $ (opens.map $ continuous_map.const _ p₀).obj U) C _ _ A = _; congr <|> refl
/--
Taking skyscraper presheaf at a point is functorial: `c ↦ skyscraper p₀ c` defines a functor by
sending every `f : a ⟶ b` to the natural transformation `α` defined as: `α(U) = f : a ⟶ b` if
`p₀ ∈ U` and the unique morphism to a terminal object in `C` if `p₀ ∉ U`.
-/
@[simps] def skyscraper_presheaf_functor.map' {a b : C} (f : a ⟶ b) :
skyscraper_presheaf p₀ a ⟶ skyscraper_presheaf p₀ b :=
{ app := λ U, if h : p₀ ∈ U.unop
then eq_to_hom (if_pos h) ≫ f ≫ eq_to_hom (if_pos h).symm
else ((if_neg h).symm.rec terminal_is_terminal).from _,
naturality' := λ U V i,
begin
simp only [skyscraper_presheaf_map], by_cases hV : p₀ ∈ V.unop,
{ have hU : p₀ ∈ U.unop := le_of_hom i.unop hV, split_ifs,
simpa only [eq_to_hom_trans_assoc, category.assoc, eq_to_hom_trans], },
{ apply ((if_neg hV).symm.rec terminal_is_terminal).hom_ext, },
end }
lemma skyscraper_presheaf_functor.map'_id {a : C} :
skyscraper_presheaf_functor.map' p₀ (𝟙 a) = 𝟙 _ :=
begin
ext1, ext1, simp only [skyscraper_presheaf_functor.map'_app, nat_trans.id_app], split_ifs,
{ simp only [category.id_comp, category.comp_id, eq_to_hom_trans, eq_to_hom_refl], },
{ apply ((if_neg h).symm.rec terminal_is_terminal).hom_ext, },
end
lemma skyscraper_presheaf_functor.map'_comp {a b c : C} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
skyscraper_presheaf_functor.map' p₀ (f ≫ g) =
skyscraper_presheaf_functor.map' p₀ f ≫ skyscraper_presheaf_functor.map' p₀ g :=
begin
ext1, ext1, simp only [skyscraper_presheaf_functor.map'_app, nat_trans.comp_app], split_ifs,
{ simp only [category.assoc, eq_to_hom_trans_assoc, eq_to_hom_refl, category.id_comp], },
{ apply ((if_neg h).symm.rec terminal_is_terminal).hom_ext, },
end
/--
Taking skyscraper presheaf at a point is functorial: `c ↦ skyscraper p₀ c` defines a functor by
sending every `f : a ⟶ b` to the natural transformation `α` defined as: `α(U) = f : a ⟶ b` if
`p₀ ∈ U` and the unique morphism to a terminal object in `C` if `p₀ ∉ U`.
-/
@[simps] def skyscraper_presheaf_functor : C ⥤ presheaf C X :=
{ obj := skyscraper_presheaf p₀,
map := λ _ _, skyscraper_presheaf_functor.map' p₀,
map_id' := λ _, skyscraper_presheaf_functor.map'_id p₀,
map_comp' := λ _ _ _, skyscraper_presheaf_functor.map'_comp p₀ }
end
section
-- In this section, we calculate the stalks for skyscraper presheaves.
-- We need to restrict universe level.
variables {C : Type v} [category.{u} C] (A : C) [has_terminal C]
/--
The cocone at `A` for the stalk functor of `skyscraper_presheaf p₀ A` when `y ∈ closure {p₀}`
-/
@[simps] def skyscraper_presheaf_cocone_of_specializes {y : X} (h : p₀ ⤳ y) :
cocone ((open_nhds.inclusion y).op ⋙ skyscraper_presheaf p₀ A) :=
{ X := A,
ι := { app := λ U, eq_to_hom $ if_pos $ h.mem_open U.unop.1.2 U.unop.2,
naturality' := λ U V inc, begin
change dite _ _ _ ≫ _ = _, rw dif_pos,
{ erw [category.comp_id, eq_to_hom_trans], refl },
{ exact h.mem_open V.unop.1.2 V.unop.2 },
end } }
/--
The cocone at `A` for the stalk functor of `skyscraper_presheaf p₀ A` when `y ∈ closure {p₀}` is a
colimit
-/
noncomputable def skyscraper_presheaf_cocone_is_colimit_of_specializes
{y : X} (h : p₀ ⤳ y) : is_colimit (skyscraper_presheaf_cocone_of_specializes p₀ A h) :=
{ desc := λ c, eq_to_hom (if_pos trivial).symm ≫ c.ι.app (op ⊤),
fac' := λ c U, begin
rw ← c.w (hom_of_le $ (le_top : unop U ≤ _)).op,
change _ ≫ _ ≫ dite _ _ _ ≫ _ = _,
rw dif_pos,
{ simpa only [skyscraper_presheaf_cocone_of_specializes_ι_app,
eq_to_hom_trans_assoc, eq_to_hom_refl, category.id_comp] },
{ exact h.mem_open U.unop.1.2 U.unop.2 },
end,
uniq' := λ c f h, by rw [← h, skyscraper_presheaf_cocone_of_specializes_ι_app,
eq_to_hom_trans_assoc, eq_to_hom_refl, category.id_comp] }
/--
If `y ∈ closure {p₀}`, then the stalk of `skyscraper_presheaf p₀ A` at `y` is `A`.
-/
noncomputable def skyscraper_presheaf_stalk_of_specializes [has_colimits C]
{y : X} (h : p₀ ⤳ y) : (skyscraper_presheaf p₀ A).stalk y ≅ A :=
colimit.iso_colimit_cocone ⟨_, skyscraper_presheaf_cocone_is_colimit_of_specializes p₀ A h⟩
/--
The cocone at `*` for the stalk functor of `skyscraper_presheaf p₀ A` when `y ∉ closure {p₀}`
-/
@[simps] def skyscraper_presheaf_cocone (y : X) :
cocone ((open_nhds.inclusion y).op ⋙ skyscraper_presheaf p₀ A) :=
{ X := terminal C,
ι :=
{ app := λ U, terminal.from _,
naturality' := λ U V inc, terminal_is_terminal.hom_ext _ _ } }
/--
The cocone at `*` for the stalk functor of `skyscraper_presheaf p₀ A` when `y ∉ closure {p₀}` is a
colimit
-/
noncomputable def skyscraper_presheaf_cocone_is_colimit_of_not_specializes
{y : X} (h : ¬p₀ ⤳ y) : is_colimit (skyscraper_presheaf_cocone p₀ A y) :=
let h1 : ∃ (U : open_nhds y), p₀ ∉ U.1 :=
let ⟨U, ho, h₀, hy⟩ := not_specializes_iff_exists_open.mp h in ⟨⟨⟨U, ho⟩, h₀⟩, hy⟩ in
{ desc := λ c, eq_to_hom (if_neg h1.some_spec).symm ≫ c.ι.app (op h1.some),
fac' := λ c U, begin
change _ = c.ι.app (op U.unop),
simp only [← c.w (hom_of_le $ @inf_le_left _ _ h1.some U.unop).op,
← c.w (hom_of_le $ @inf_le_right _ _ h1.some U.unop).op, ← category.assoc],
congr' 1,
refine ((if_neg _).symm.rec terminal_is_terminal).hom_ext _ _,
exact λ h, h1.some_spec h.1,
end,
uniq' := λ c f H, begin
rw [← category.id_comp f, ← H, ← category.assoc],
congr' 1, apply terminal_is_terminal.hom_ext,
end }
/--
If `y ∉ closure {p₀}`, then the stalk of `skyscraper_presheaf p₀ A` at `y` is isomorphic to a
terminal object.
-/
noncomputable def skyscraper_presheaf_stalk_of_not_specializes [has_colimits C]
{y : X} (h : ¬p₀ ⤳ y) : (skyscraper_presheaf p₀ A).stalk y ≅ terminal C :=
colimit.iso_colimit_cocone ⟨_, skyscraper_presheaf_cocone_is_colimit_of_not_specializes _ A h⟩
/--
If `y ∉ closure {p₀}`, then the stalk of `skyscraper_presheaf p₀ A` at `y` is a terminal object
-/
def skyscraper_presheaf_stalk_of_not_specializes_is_terminal
[has_colimits C] {y : X} (h : ¬p₀ ⤳ y) : is_terminal ((skyscraper_presheaf p₀ A).stalk y) :=
is_terminal.of_iso terminal_is_terminal $ (skyscraper_presheaf_stalk_of_not_specializes _ _ h).symm
lemma skyscraper_presheaf_is_sheaf : (skyscraper_presheaf p₀ A).is_sheaf :=
by classical; exact (presheaf.is_sheaf_iso_iff
(eq_to_iso $ skyscraper_presheaf_eq_pushforward p₀ A)).mpr
(sheaf.pushforward_sheaf_of_sheaf _ (presheaf.is_sheaf_on_punit_of_is_terminal _
(by { dsimp, rw if_neg, exact terminal_is_terminal, exact set.not_mem_empty punit.star })))
/--
The skyscraper presheaf supported at `p₀` with value `A` is the sheaf that assigns `A` to all opens
`U` that contain `p₀` and assigns `*` otherwise.
-/
def skyscraper_sheaf : sheaf C X :=
⟨skyscraper_presheaf p₀ A, skyscraper_presheaf_is_sheaf _ _⟩
/--
Taking skyscraper sheaf at a point is functorial: `c ↦ skyscraper p₀ c` defines a functor by
sending every `f : a ⟶ b` to the natural transformation `α` defined as: `α(U) = f : a ⟶ b` if
`p₀ ∈ U` and the unique morphism to a terminal object in `C` if `p₀ ∉ U`.
-/
def skyscraper_sheaf_functor : C ⥤ sheaf C X :=
{ obj := λ c, skyscraper_sheaf p₀ c,
map := λ a b f, Sheaf.hom.mk $ (skyscraper_presheaf_functor p₀).map f,
map_id' := λ c, Sheaf.hom.ext _ _ $ (skyscraper_presheaf_functor p₀).map_id _,
map_comp' := λ _ _ _ f g, Sheaf.hom.ext _ _ $ (skyscraper_presheaf_functor p₀).map_comp _ _ }
namespace stalk_skyscraper_presheaf_adjunction_auxs
variables [has_colimits C]
/--
If `f : 𝓕.stalk p₀ ⟶ c`, then a natural transformation `𝓕 ⟶ skyscraper_presheaf p₀ c` can be
defined by: `𝓕.germ p₀ ≫ f : 𝓕(U) ⟶ c` if `p₀ ∈ U` and the unique morphism to a terminal object
if `p₀ ∉ U`.
-/
@[simps] def to_skyscraper_presheaf {𝓕 : presheaf C X} {c : C} (f : 𝓕.stalk p₀ ⟶ c) :
𝓕 ⟶ skyscraper_presheaf p₀ c :=
{ app := λ U, if h : p₀ ∈ U.unop
then 𝓕.germ ⟨p₀, h⟩ ≫ f ≫ eq_to_hom (if_pos h).symm
else ((if_neg h).symm.rec terminal_is_terminal).from _,
naturality' := λ U V inc,
begin
dsimp, by_cases hV : p₀ ∈ V.unop,
{ have hU : p₀ ∈ U.unop := le_of_hom inc.unop hV, split_ifs,
erw [←category.assoc, 𝓕.germ_res inc.unop, category.assoc, category.assoc, eq_to_hom_trans],
refl, },
{ split_ifs, apply ((if_neg hV).symm.rec terminal_is_terminal).hom_ext },
end }
/--
If `f : 𝓕 ⟶ skyscraper_presheaf p₀ c` is a natural transformation, then there is a morphism
`𝓕.stalk p₀ ⟶ c` defined as the morphism from colimit to cocone at `c`.
-/
def from_stalk {𝓕 : presheaf C X} {c : C} (f : 𝓕 ⟶ skyscraper_presheaf p₀ c) :
𝓕.stalk p₀ ⟶ c :=
let χ : cocone ((open_nhds.inclusion p₀).op ⋙ 𝓕) := cocone.mk c $
{ app := λ U, f.app (op U.unop.1) ≫ eq_to_hom (if_pos U.unop.2),
naturality' := λ U V inc,
begin
dsimp, erw [category.comp_id, ←category.assoc, comp_eq_to_hom_iff, category.assoc,
eq_to_hom_trans, f.naturality, skyscraper_presheaf_map],
have hV : p₀ ∈ (open_nhds.inclusion p₀).obj V.unop := V.unop.2, split_ifs,
simpa only [comp_eq_to_hom_iff, category.assoc, eq_to_hom_trans, eq_to_hom_refl,
category.comp_id],
end } in colimit.desc _ χ
lemma to_skyscraper_from_stalk {𝓕 : presheaf C X} {c : C} (f : 𝓕 ⟶ skyscraper_presheaf p₀ c) :
to_skyscraper_presheaf p₀ (from_stalk _ f) = f :=
nat_trans.ext _ _ $ funext $ λ U, (em (p₀ ∈ U.unop)).elim
(λ h, by { dsimp, split_ifs, erw [←category.assoc, colimit.ι_desc, category.assoc,
eq_to_hom_trans, eq_to_hom_refl, category.comp_id], refl }) $
λ h, by { dsimp, split_ifs, apply ((if_neg h).symm.rec terminal_is_terminal).hom_ext }
lemma from_stalk_to_skyscraper {𝓕 : presheaf C X} {c : C} (f : 𝓕.stalk p₀ ⟶ c) :
from_stalk p₀ (to_skyscraper_presheaf _ f) = f :=
colimit.hom_ext $ λ U, by { erw [colimit.ι_desc], dsimp, rw dif_pos U.unop.2, rw [category.assoc,
category.assoc, eq_to_hom_trans, eq_to_hom_refl, category.comp_id, presheaf.germ], congr' 3,
apply_fun opposite.unop using unop_injective, rw [unop_op], ext, refl }
/--
The unit in `presheaf.stalk ⊣ skyscraper_presheaf_functor`
-/
@[simps] protected def unit :
𝟭 (presheaf C X) ⟶ presheaf.stalk_functor C p₀ ⋙ skyscraper_presheaf_functor p₀ :=
{ app := λ 𝓕, to_skyscraper_presheaf _ $ 𝟙 _,
naturality' := λ 𝓕 𝓖 f,
begin
ext U, dsimp, split_ifs,
{ simp only [category.id_comp, ←category.assoc], rw [comp_eq_to_hom_iff],
simp only [category.assoc, eq_to_hom_trans, eq_to_hom_refl, category.comp_id],
erw [colimit.ι_map], refl, },
{ apply ((if_neg h).symm.rec terminal_is_terminal).hom_ext, },
end }
/--
The counit in `presheaf.stalk ⊣ skyscraper_presheaf_functor`
-/
@[simps] protected def counit :
(skyscraper_presheaf_functor p₀ ⋙ (presheaf.stalk_functor C p₀ : presheaf C X ⥤ C)) ⟶ 𝟭 C :=
{ app := λ c, (skyscraper_presheaf_stalk_of_specializes p₀ c specializes_rfl).hom,
naturality' := λ x y f, colimit.hom_ext $ λ U,
begin
erw [←category.assoc, colimit.ι_map, colimit.iso_colimit_cocone_ι_hom_assoc,
skyscraper_presheaf_cocone_of_specializes_ι_app, category.assoc, colimit.ι_desc,
whiskering_left_obj_map, whisker_left_app, skyscraper_presheaf_functor.map'_app,
dif_pos U.unop.2, skyscraper_presheaf_cocone_of_specializes_ι_app, comp_eq_to_hom_iff,
category.assoc, eq_to_hom_comp_iff, ←category.assoc, eq_to_hom_trans, eq_to_hom_refl,
category.id_comp, comp_eq_to_hom_iff, category.assoc, eq_to_hom_trans, eq_to_hom_refl,
category.comp_id, category_theory.functor.id_map],
end }
end stalk_skyscraper_presheaf_adjunction_auxs
section
open stalk_skyscraper_presheaf_adjunction_auxs
/--
`skyscraper_presheaf_functor` is the right adjoint of `presheaf.stalk_functor`
-/
def skyscraper_presheaf_stalk_adjunction [has_colimits C] :
(presheaf.stalk_functor C p₀ : presheaf C X ⥤ C) ⊣ skyscraper_presheaf_functor p₀ :=
{ hom_equiv := λ c 𝓕,
{ to_fun := to_skyscraper_presheaf _,
inv_fun := from_stalk _,
left_inv := from_stalk_to_skyscraper _,
right_inv := to_skyscraper_from_stalk _ },
unit := stalk_skyscraper_presheaf_adjunction_auxs.unit _,
counit := stalk_skyscraper_presheaf_adjunction_auxs.counit _,
hom_equiv_unit' := λ 𝓕 c α,
begin
ext U, simp only [equiv.coe_fn_mk, to_skyscraper_presheaf_app, nat_trans.comp_app,
skyscraper_presheaf_functor.map'_app, skyscraper_presheaf_functor_map, unit_app], split_ifs,
{ erw [category.id_comp, ←category.assoc, comp_eq_to_hom_iff, category.assoc, category.assoc,
category.assoc, category.assoc, eq_to_hom_trans, eq_to_hom_refl, category.comp_id,
←category.assoc _ _ α, eq_to_hom_trans, eq_to_hom_refl, category.id_comp], },
{ apply ((if_neg h).symm.rec terminal_is_terminal).hom_ext }
end,
hom_equiv_counit' := λ 𝓕 c α,
begin
ext U, simp only [equiv.coe_fn_symm_mk, counit_app],
erw [colimit.ι_desc, ←category.assoc, colimit.ι_map, whisker_left_app, category.assoc,
colimit.ι_desc], refl,
end }
instance [has_colimits C] : is_right_adjoint (skyscraper_presheaf_functor p₀ : C ⥤ presheaf C X) :=
⟨_, skyscraper_presheaf_stalk_adjunction _⟩
instance [has_colimits C] : is_left_adjoint (presheaf.stalk_functor C p₀) :=
⟨_, skyscraper_presheaf_stalk_adjunction _⟩
/--
Taking stalks of a sheaf is the left adjoint functor to `skyscraper_sheaf_functor`
-/
def stalk_skyscraper_sheaf_adjunction [has_colimits C] :
sheaf.forget C X ⋙ presheaf.stalk_functor _ p₀ ⊣ skyscraper_sheaf_functor p₀ :=
{ hom_equiv := λ 𝓕 c,
⟨λ f, ⟨to_skyscraper_presheaf p₀ f⟩, λ g, from_stalk p₀ g.1, from_stalk_to_skyscraper p₀,
λ g, by { ext1, apply to_skyscraper_from_stalk }⟩,
unit :=
{ app := λ 𝓕, ⟨(stalk_skyscraper_presheaf_adjunction_auxs.unit p₀).app 𝓕.1⟩,
naturality' := λ 𝓐 𝓑 ⟨f⟩,
by { ext1, apply (stalk_skyscraper_presheaf_adjunction_auxs.unit p₀).naturality } },
counit := stalk_skyscraper_presheaf_adjunction_auxs.counit p₀,
hom_equiv_unit' := λ 𝓐 c f,
by { ext1, exact (skyscraper_presheaf_stalk_adjunction p₀).hom_equiv_unit },
hom_equiv_counit' := λ 𝓐 c f, (skyscraper_presheaf_stalk_adjunction p₀).hom_equiv_counit }
instance [has_colimits C] : is_right_adjoint (skyscraper_sheaf_functor p₀ : C ⥤ sheaf C X) :=
⟨_, stalk_skyscraper_sheaf_adjunction _⟩
end
end
|
d6af4bb1ae59b981f35e94f5b2bf97aa5c9603c9 | dc253be9829b840f15d96d986e0c13520b085033 | /algebra/seq_colim.hlean | 88d98b813da6f928a40994787178df85fbed730c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | cmu-phil/Spectral | 4ce68e5c1ef2a812ffda5260e9f09f41b85ae0ea | 3b078f5f1de251637decf04bd3fc8aa01930a6b3 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,119,195,535 | 1,684,169,772,000 | 1,684,169,772,000 | 46,450,197 | 42 | 13 | null | 1,505,516,767,000 | 1,447,883,921,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,939 | hlean | --Authors: Robert Rose, Liz Vidaurre
import .direct_sum ..move_to_lib
open eq algebra is_trunc set_quotient relation sigma prod sum list trunc function equiv sigma.ops nat
namespace group
section
parameters (A : ℕ → AbGroup) (f : Πi , A i →g A (i + 1))
variables {A' : AbGroup}
definition seq_colim_carrier : AbGroup := dirsum A
inductive seq_colim_rel : seq_colim_carrier → Type :=
| rmk : Πi a, seq_colim_rel ((dirsum_incl A i a) * (dirsum_incl A (i + 1) (f i a))⁻¹)
definition seq_colim : AbGroup := quotient_ab_group_gen seq_colim_carrier (λa, ∥seq_colim_rel a∥)
parameters {A f}
definition seq_colim_incl [constructor] (i : ℕ) : A i →g seq_colim :=
gqg_map _ _ ∘g dirsum_incl A i
definition seq_colim_quotient (h : Πi, A i →g A') (k : Πi a, h i a = h (succ i) (f i a))
(v : seq_colim_carrier) (r : ∥seq_colim_rel v∥) : dirsum_elim h v = 1 :=
begin
induction r with r, induction r,
refine !to_respect_mul ⬝ _,
refine ap (λγ, group_fun (dirsum_elim h) (group_fun (dirsum_incl A i) a) * group_fun (dirsum_elim h) γ)
(!to_respect_inv)⁻¹ ⬝ _,
refine ap (λγ, γ * group_fun (dirsum_elim h) (group_fun (dirsum_incl A (succ i)) (f i a)⁻¹))
!dirsum_elim_compute ⬝ _,
refine ap (λγ, (h i a) * γ) !dirsum_elim_compute ⬝ _,
refine ap (λγ, γ * group_fun (h (succ i)) (f i a)⁻¹) !k ⬝ _,
refine ap (λγ, group_fun (h (succ i)) (f i a) * γ) (!to_respect_inv) ⬝ _,
exact !mul.right_inv
end
definition seq_colim_elim [constructor] (h : Πi, A i →g A')
(k : Πi a, h i a = h (succ i) (f i a)) : seq_colim →g A' :=
gqg_elim _ (dirsum_elim h) (seq_colim_quotient h k)
definition seq_colim_compute (h : Πi, A i →g A')
(k : Πi a, h i a = h (succ i) (f i a)) (i : ℕ) (a : A i) :
(seq_colim_elim h k) (seq_colim_incl i a) = h i a :=
begin
refine gqg_elim_compute (λa, ∥seq_colim_rel a∥) (dirsum_elim h) (seq_colim_quotient h k) (dirsum_incl A i a) ⬝ _,
exact !dirsum_elim_compute
end
definition seq_colim_glue {i : @trunctype.mk 0 ℕ _} {a : A i} : seq_colim_incl i a = seq_colim_incl (succ i) (f i a) :=
begin
refine gqg_eq_of_rel _ _,
exact tr (seq_colim_rel.rmk _ _)
end
section
local abbreviation h (m : seq_colim →g A') : Πi, A i →g A' := λi, m ∘g (seq_colim_incl i)
local abbreviation k (m : seq_colim →g A') : Πi a, h m i a = h m (succ i) (f i a) :=
λ i a, ap m (@seq_colim_glue i a)
definition seq_colim_unique (m : seq_colim →g A') :
Πv, seq_colim_elim (h m) (k m) v = m v :=
begin
intro v, refine (gqg_elim_unique _ (dirsum_elim (h m)) _ m _ _)⁻¹ ⬝ _,
apply dirsum_elim_unique, rotate 1, reflexivity,
intro i a, reflexivity
end
end
end
definition seq_colim_functor [constructor] {A A' : ℕ → AbGroup}
{f : Πi , A i →g A (i + 1)} {f' : Πi , A' i →g A' (i + 1)}
(h : Πi, A i →g A' i) (p : Πi, hsquare (f i) (f' i) (h i) (h (i+1))) :
seq_colim A f →g seq_colim A' f' :=
seq_colim_elim (λi, seq_colim_incl i ∘g h i)
begin
intro i a,
refine _ ⬝ ap (seq_colim_incl (succ i)) (p i a)⁻¹,
apply seq_colim_glue
end
-- definition seq_colim_functor_compose [constructor] {A A' A'' : ℕ → AbGroup}
-- {f : Πi , A i →g A (i + 1)} {f' : Πi , A' i →g A' (i + 1)} {f'' : Πi , A'' i →g A'' (i + 1)}
-- (h : Πi, A i →g A' i) (p : Πi (a : A i), h (i+1) (f i a) = f' i (h i a))
-- (h : Πi, A i →g A' i) (p : Πi (a : A i), h (i+1) (f i a) = f' i (h i a)) :
-- seq_colim A f →g seq_colim A' f' :=
-- sorry
end group
|
ab7d33370a398923d6eb805839ede4d14f8337a8 | 57c233acf9386e610d99ed20ef139c5f97504ba3 | /src/number_theory/padics/ring_homs.lean | b07dfdc5ef4dff7c0f3447f6d9edc239938c39c3 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | robertylewis/mathlib | 3d16e3e6daf5ddde182473e03a1b601d2810952c | 1d13f5b932f5e40a8308e3840f96fc882fae01f0 | refs/heads/master | 1,651,379,945,369 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 98,875,504 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,644,253,514,000 | 1,501,495,700,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 24,377 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import data.zmod.basic
import number_theory.padics.padic_integers
/-!
# Relating `ℤ_[p]` to `zmod (p ^ n)`
In this file we establish connections between the `p`-adic integers $\mathbb{Z}_p$
and the integers modulo powers of `p`, $\mathbb{Z}/p^n\mathbb{Z}$.
## Main declarations
We show that $\mathbb{Z}_p$ has a ring hom to $\mathbb{Z}/p^n\mathbb{Z}$ for each `n`.
The case for `n = 1` is handled separately, since it is used in the general construction
and we may want to use it without the `^1` getting in the way.
* `padic_int.to_zmod`: ring hom to `zmod p`
* `padic_int.to_zmod_pow`: ring hom to `zmod (p^n)`
* `padic_int.ker_to_zmod` / `padic_int.ker_to_zmod_pow`: the kernels of these maps are the ideals
generated by `p^n`
We also establish the universal property of $\mathbb{Z}_p$ as a projective limit.
Given a family of compatible ring homs $f_k : R \to \mathbb{Z}/p^n\mathbb{Z}$,
there is a unique limit $R \to \mathbb{Z}_p$.
* `padic_int.lift`: the limit function
* `padic_int.lift_spec` / `padic_int.lift_unique`: the universal property
## Implementation notes
The ring hom constructions go through an auxiliary constructor `padic_int.to_zmod_hom`,
which removes some boilerplate code.
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical
open nat local_ring padic
namespace padic_int
variables {p : ℕ} [hp_prime : fact (p.prime)]
include hp_prime
section ring_homs
/-! ### Ring homomorphisms to `zmod p` and `zmod (p ^ n)` -/
variables (p) (r : ℚ)
omit hp_prime
/--
`mod_part p r` is an integer that satisfies
`∥(r - mod_part p r : ℚ_[p])∥ < 1` when `∥(r : ℚ_[p])∥ ≤ 1`,
see `padic_int.norm_sub_mod_part`.
It is the unique non-negative integer that is `< p` with this property.
(Note that this definition assumes `r : ℚ`.
See `padic_int.zmod_repr` for a version that takes values in `ℕ`
and works for arbitrary `x : ℤ_[p]`.) -/
def mod_part : ℤ :=
(r.num * gcd_a r.denom p) % p
include hp_prime
variable {p}
lemma mod_part_lt_p : mod_part p r < p :=
begin
convert int.mod_lt _ _,
{ simp },
{ exact_mod_cast hp_prime.1.ne_zero }
end
lemma mod_part_nonneg : 0 ≤ mod_part p r :=
int.mod_nonneg _ $ by exact_mod_cast hp_prime.1.ne_zero
lemma is_unit_denom (r : ℚ) (h : ∥(r : ℚ_[p])∥ ≤ 1) : is_unit (r.denom : ℤ_[p]) :=
begin
rw is_unit_iff,
apply le_antisymm (r.denom : ℤ_[p]).2,
rw [← not_lt, val_eq_coe, coe_coe],
intro norm_denom_lt,
have hr : ∥(r * r.denom : ℚ_[p])∥ = ∥(r.num : ℚ_[p])∥,
{ rw_mod_cast @rat.mul_denom_eq_num r, refl, },
rw padic_norm_e.mul at hr,
have key : ∥(r.num : ℚ_[p])∥ < 1,
{ calc _ = _ : hr.symm
... < 1 * 1 : mul_lt_mul' h norm_denom_lt (norm_nonneg _) zero_lt_one
... = 1 : mul_one 1 },
have : ↑p ∣ r.num ∧ (p : ℤ) ∣ r.denom,
{ simp only [← norm_int_lt_one_iff_dvd, ← padic_norm_e_of_padic_int],
norm_cast, exact ⟨key, norm_denom_lt⟩ },
apply hp_prime.1.not_dvd_one,
rwa [← r.cop.gcd_eq_one, nat.dvd_gcd_iff, ← int.coe_nat_dvd_left, ← int.coe_nat_dvd],
end
lemma norm_sub_mod_part_aux (r : ℚ) (h : ∥(r : ℚ_[p])∥ ≤ 1) :
↑p ∣ r.num - r.num * r.denom.gcd_a p % p * ↑(r.denom) :=
begin
rw ← zmod.int_coe_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd,
simp only [int.cast_coe_nat, zmod.nat_cast_mod p, int.cast_mul, int.cast_sub],
have := congr_arg (coe : ℤ → zmod p) (gcd_eq_gcd_ab r.denom p),
simp only [int.cast_coe_nat, add_zero, int.cast_add, zmod.nat_cast_self, int.cast_mul, zero_mul]
at this,
push_cast,
rw [mul_right_comm, mul_assoc, ←this],
suffices rdcp : r.denom.coprime p,
{ rw rdcp.gcd_eq_one, simp only [mul_one, cast_one, sub_self], },
apply coprime.symm,
apply (coprime_or_dvd_of_prime hp_prime.1 _).resolve_right,
rw [← int.coe_nat_dvd, ← norm_int_lt_one_iff_dvd, not_lt],
apply ge_of_eq,
rw ← is_unit_iff,
exact is_unit_denom r h,
end
lemma norm_sub_mod_part (h : ∥(r : ℚ_[p])∥ ≤ 1) : ∥(⟨r,h⟩ - mod_part p r : ℤ_[p])∥ < 1 :=
begin
let n := mod_part p r,
rw [norm_lt_one_iff_dvd, ← (is_unit_denom r h).dvd_mul_right],
suffices : ↑p ∣ r.num - n * r.denom,
{ convert (int.cast_ring_hom ℤ_[p]).map_dvd this,
simp only [sub_mul, int.cast_coe_nat, ring_hom.eq_int_cast, int.cast_mul,
sub_left_inj, int.cast_sub],
apply subtype.coe_injective,
simp only [coe_mul, subtype.coe_mk, coe_coe],
rw_mod_cast @rat.mul_denom_eq_num r, refl },
exact norm_sub_mod_part_aux r h
end
lemma exists_mem_range_of_norm_rat_le_one (h : ∥(r : ℚ_[p])∥ ≤ 1) :
∃ n : ℤ, 0 ≤ n ∧ n < p ∧ ∥(⟨r,h⟩ - n : ℤ_[p])∥ < 1 :=
⟨mod_part p r, mod_part_nonneg _, mod_part_lt_p _, norm_sub_mod_part _ h⟩
lemma zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span_aux (n : ℕ) (x : ℤ_[p]) (a b : ℤ)
(ha : x - a ∈ (ideal.span {p ^ n} : ideal ℤ_[p]))
(hb : x - b ∈ (ideal.span {p ^ n} : ideal ℤ_[p])) :
(a : zmod (p ^ n)) = b :=
begin
rw [ideal.mem_span_singleton] at ha hb,
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← int.cast_sub,
zmod.int_coe_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd, int.coe_nat_pow],
rw [← dvd_neg, neg_sub] at ha,
have := dvd_add ha hb,
rwa [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc, neg_add_cancel_left,
← sub_eq_add_neg, ← int.cast_sub, pow_p_dvd_int_iff] at this,
end
lemma zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span (n : ℕ) (x : ℤ_[p]) (a b : ℕ)
(ha : x - a ∈ (ideal.span {p ^ n} : ideal ℤ_[p]))
(hb : x - b ∈ (ideal.span {p ^ n} : ideal ℤ_[p])) :
(a : zmod (p ^ n)) = b :=
zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span_aux n x a b ha hb
lemma zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_max_ideal (x : ℤ_[p]) (m n : ℕ)
(hm : x - m ∈ maximal_ideal ℤ_[p]) (hn : x - n ∈ maximal_ideal ℤ_[p]) :
(m : zmod p) = n :=
begin
rw maximal_ideal_eq_span_p at hm hn,
have := zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span_aux 1 x m n,
simp only [pow_one] at this,
specialize this hm hn,
apply_fun zmod.cast_hom (show p ∣ p ^ 1, by rw pow_one) (zmod p) at this,
simpa only [ring_hom.map_int_cast],
end
variable (x : ℤ_[p])
lemma exists_mem_range : ∃ n : ℕ, n < p ∧ (x - n ∈ maximal_ideal ℤ_[p]) :=
begin
simp only [maximal_ideal_eq_span_p, ideal.mem_span_singleton, ← norm_lt_one_iff_dvd],
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := rat_dense (x : ℚ_[p]) zero_lt_one,
have H : ∥(r : ℚ_[p])∥ ≤ 1,
{ rw norm_sub_rev at hr,
calc _ = ∥(r : ℚ_[p]) - x + x∥ : by ring_nf
... ≤ _ : padic_norm_e.nonarchimedean _ _
... ≤ _ : max_le (le_of_lt hr) x.2 },
obtain ⟨n, hzn, hnp, hn⟩ := exists_mem_range_of_norm_rat_le_one r H,
lift n to ℕ using hzn,
use n,
split, {exact_mod_cast hnp},
simp only [norm_def, coe_sub, subtype.coe_mk, coe_coe] at hn ⊢,
rw show (x - n : ℚ_[p]) = (x - r) + (r - n), by ring,
apply lt_of_le_of_lt (padic_norm_e.nonarchimedean _ _),
apply max_lt hr,
simpa using hn
end
/--
`zmod_repr x` is the unique natural number smaller than `p`
satisfying `∥(x - zmod_repr x : ℤ_[p])∥ < 1`.
-/
def zmod_repr : ℕ :=
classical.some (exists_mem_range x)
lemma zmod_repr_spec : zmod_repr x < p ∧ (x - zmod_repr x ∈ maximal_ideal ℤ_[p]) :=
classical.some_spec (exists_mem_range x)
lemma zmod_repr_lt_p : zmod_repr x < p := (zmod_repr_spec _).1
lemma sub_zmod_repr_mem : (x - zmod_repr x ∈ maximal_ideal ℤ_[p]) := (zmod_repr_spec _).2
/--
`to_zmod_hom` is an auxiliary constructor for creating ring homs from `ℤ_[p]` to `zmod v`.
-/
def to_zmod_hom (v : ℕ) (f : ℤ_[p] → ℕ) (f_spec : ∀ x, x - f x ∈ (ideal.span {v} : ideal ℤ_[p]))
(f_congr : ∀ (x : ℤ_[p]) (a b : ℕ),
x - a ∈ (ideal.span {v} : ideal ℤ_[p]) → x - b ∈ (ideal.span {v} : ideal ℤ_[p]) →
(a : zmod v) = b) :
ℤ_[p] →+* zmod v :=
{ to_fun := λ x, f x,
map_zero' :=
begin
rw [f_congr (0 : ℤ_[p]) _ 0, cast_zero],
{ exact f_spec _ },
{ simp only [sub_zero, cast_zero, submodule.zero_mem], }
end,
map_one' :=
begin
rw [f_congr (1 : ℤ_[p]) _ 1, cast_one],
{ exact f_spec _ },
{ simp only [sub_self, cast_one, submodule.zero_mem], }
end,
map_add' :=
begin
intros x y,
rw [f_congr (x + y) _ (f x + f y), cast_add],
{ exact f_spec _ },
{ convert ideal.add_mem _ (f_spec x) (f_spec y),
rw cast_add,
ring, }
end,
map_mul' :=
begin
intros x y,
rw [f_congr (x * y) _ (f x * f y), cast_mul],
{ exact f_spec _ },
{ let I : ideal ℤ_[p] := ideal.span {v},
convert I.add_mem (I.mul_mem_left x (f_spec y)) (I.mul_mem_right (f y) (f_spec x)),
rw cast_mul,
ring, }
end, }
/--
`to_zmod` is a ring hom from `ℤ_[p]` to `zmod p`,
with the equality `to_zmod x = (zmod_repr x : zmod p)`.
-/
def to_zmod : ℤ_[p] →+* zmod p :=
to_zmod_hom p zmod_repr
(by { rw ←maximal_ideal_eq_span_p, exact sub_zmod_repr_mem })
(by { rw ←maximal_ideal_eq_span_p, exact zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_max_ideal } )
/--
`z - (to_zmod z : ℤ_[p])` is contained in the maximal ideal of `ℤ_[p]`, for every `z : ℤ_[p]`.
The coercion from `zmod p` to `ℤ_[p]` is `zmod.has_coe_t`,
which coerces `zmod p` into artibrary rings.
This is unfortunate, but a consequence of the fact that we allow `zmod p`
to coerce to rings of arbitrary characteristic, instead of only rings of characteristic `p`.
This coercion is only a ring homomorphism if it coerces into a ring whose characteristic divides
`p`. While this is not the case here we can still make use of the coercion.
-/
lemma to_zmod_spec (z : ℤ_[p]) : z - (to_zmod z : ℤ_[p]) ∈ maximal_ideal ℤ_[p] :=
begin
convert sub_zmod_repr_mem z using 2,
dsimp [to_zmod, to_zmod_hom],
unfreezingI { rcases (exists_eq_add_of_lt (hp_prime.1.pos)) with ⟨p', rfl⟩ },
change ↑(zmod.val _) = _,
simp only [zmod.val_nat_cast, add_zero, add_def, nat.cast_inj, zero_add],
apply mod_eq_of_lt,
simpa only [zero_add] using zmod_repr_lt_p z,
end
lemma ker_to_zmod : (to_zmod : ℤ_[p] →+* zmod p).ker = maximal_ideal ℤ_[p] :=
begin
ext x,
rw ring_hom.mem_ker,
split,
{ intro h,
simpa only [h, zmod.cast_zero, sub_zero] using to_zmod_spec x, },
{ intro h,
rw ← sub_zero x at h,
dsimp [to_zmod, to_zmod_hom],
convert zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_max_ideal x _ 0 _ h,
apply sub_zmod_repr_mem, }
end
/-- `appr n x` gives a value `v : ℕ` such that `x` and `↑v : ℤ_p` are congruent mod `p^n`.
See `appr_spec`. -/
noncomputable def appr : ℤ_[p] → ℕ → ℕ
| x 0 := 0
| x (n+1) :=
let y := x - appr x n in
if hy : y = 0 then
appr x n
else
let u := unit_coeff hy in
appr x n + p ^ n * (to_zmod ((u : ℤ_[p]) * (p ^ (y.valuation - n).nat_abs))).val
lemma appr_lt (x : ℤ_[p]) (n : ℕ) : x.appr n < p ^ n :=
begin
induction n with n ih generalizing x,
{ simp only [appr, succ_pos', pow_zero], },
simp only [appr, map_nat_cast, zmod.nat_cast_self, ring_hom.map_pow, int.nat_abs,
ring_hom.map_mul],
have hp : p ^ n < p ^ (n + 1),
{ apply pow_lt_pow hp_prime.1.one_lt (lt_add_one n) },
split_ifs with h,
{ apply lt_trans (ih _) hp, },
{ calc _ < p ^ n + p ^ n * (p - 1) : _
... = p ^ (n + 1) : _,
{ apply add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le (ih _),
apply nat.mul_le_mul_left,
apply le_pred_of_lt,
apply zmod.val_lt },
{ rw [mul_tsub, mul_one, ← pow_succ'],
apply add_tsub_cancel_of_le (le_of_lt hp) } }
end
lemma appr_mono (x : ℤ_[p]) : monotone x.appr :=
begin
apply monotone_nat_of_le_succ,
intro n,
dsimp [appr],
split_ifs, { refl, },
apply nat.le_add_right,
end
lemma dvd_appr_sub_appr (x : ℤ_[p]) (m n : ℕ) (h : m ≤ n) :
p ^ m ∣ x.appr n - x.appr m :=
begin
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := nat.exists_eq_add_of_le h, clear h,
induction k with k ih,
{ simp only [add_zero, tsub_self, dvd_zero], },
rw [nat.succ_eq_add_one, ← add_assoc],
dsimp [appr],
split_ifs with h,
{ exact ih },
rw [add_comm, add_tsub_assoc_of_le (appr_mono _ (nat.le_add_right m k))],
apply dvd_add _ ih,
apply dvd_mul_of_dvd_left,
apply pow_dvd_pow _ (nat.le_add_right m k),
end
lemma appr_spec (n : ℕ) : ∀ (x : ℤ_[p]), x - appr x n ∈ (ideal.span {p^n} : ideal ℤ_[p]) :=
begin
simp only [ideal.mem_span_singleton],
induction n with n ih,
{ simp only [is_unit_one, is_unit.dvd, pow_zero, forall_true_iff], },
intro x,
dsimp only [appr],
split_ifs with h,
{ rw h, apply dvd_zero },
push_cast, rw sub_add_eq_sub_sub,
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := ih x,
simp only [map_nat_cast, zmod.nat_cast_self, ring_hom.map_pow, ring_hom.map_mul,
zmod.nat_cast_val],
have hc' : c ≠ 0,
{ rintro rfl, simp only [mul_zero] at hc, contradiction },
conv_rhs { congr, simp only [hc], },
rw show (x - ↑(appr x n)).valuation = (↑p ^ n * c).valuation,
{ rw hc },
rw [valuation_p_pow_mul _ _ hc', add_sub_cancel', pow_succ', ← mul_sub],
apply mul_dvd_mul_left,
obtain hc0 | hc0 := c.valuation.nat_abs.eq_zero_or_pos,
{ simp only [hc0, mul_one, pow_zero],
rw [mul_comm, unit_coeff_spec h] at hc,
suffices : c = unit_coeff h,
{ rw [← this, ← ideal.mem_span_singleton, ← maximal_ideal_eq_span_p],
apply to_zmod_spec },
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ : is_unit c, -- TODO: write a can_lift instance for units
{ rw int.nat_abs_eq_zero at hc0,
rw [is_unit_iff, norm_eq_pow_val hc', hc0, neg_zero, zpow_zero], },
rw discrete_valuation_ring.unit_mul_pow_congr_unit _ _ _ _ _ hc,
exact irreducible_p },
{ rw zero_pow hc0,
simp only [sub_zero, zmod.cast_zero, mul_zero],
rw unit_coeff_spec hc',
exact (dvd_pow_self _ hc0.ne').mul_left _ }
end
attribute [irreducible] appr
/-- A ring hom from `ℤ_[p]` to `zmod (p^n)`, with underlying function `padic_int.appr n`. -/
def to_zmod_pow (n : ℕ) : ℤ_[p] →+* zmod (p ^ n) :=
to_zmod_hom (p^n) (λ x, appr x n)
(by { intros, convert appr_spec n _ using 1, simp })
(by { intros x a b ha hb,
apply zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span n x a b,
{ simpa using ha },
{ simpa using hb } })
lemma ker_to_zmod_pow (n : ℕ) : (to_zmod_pow n : ℤ_[p] →+* zmod (p ^ n)).ker = ideal.span {p ^ n} :=
begin
ext x,
rw ring_hom.mem_ker,
split,
{ intro h,
suffices : x.appr n = 0,
{ convert appr_spec n x, simp only [this, sub_zero, cast_zero], },
dsimp [to_zmod_pow, to_zmod_hom] at h,
rw zmod.nat_coe_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd at h,
apply eq_zero_of_dvd_of_lt h (appr_lt _ _), },
{ intro h,
rw ← sub_zero x at h,
dsimp [to_zmod_pow, to_zmod_hom],
rw [zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span n x _ 0 _ h, cast_zero],
apply appr_spec, }
end
@[simp] lemma zmod_cast_comp_to_zmod_pow (m n : ℕ) (h : m ≤ n) :
(zmod.cast_hom (pow_dvd_pow p h) (zmod (p ^ m))).comp (to_zmod_pow n) = to_zmod_pow m :=
begin
apply zmod.ring_hom_eq_of_ker_eq,
ext x,
rw [ring_hom.mem_ker, ring_hom.mem_ker],
simp only [function.comp_app, zmod.cast_hom_apply, ring_hom.coe_comp],
simp only [to_zmod_pow, to_zmod_hom, ring_hom.coe_mk],
rw [zmod.cast_nat_cast (pow_dvd_pow p h),
zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span m (x.appr n) (x.appr n) (x.appr m)],
{ rw [sub_self], apply ideal.zero_mem _, },
{ rw ideal.mem_span_singleton,
rcases dvd_appr_sub_appr x m n h with ⟨c, hc⟩,
use c,
rw [← nat.cast_sub (appr_mono _ h), hc, nat.cast_mul, nat.cast_pow], },
{ apply_instance }
end
@[simp] lemma cast_to_zmod_pow (m n : ℕ) (h : m ≤ n) (x : ℤ_[p]) :
↑(to_zmod_pow n x) = to_zmod_pow m x :=
by { rw ← zmod_cast_comp_to_zmod_pow _ _ h, refl }
lemma dense_range_nat_cast :
dense_range (nat.cast : ℕ → ℤ_[p]) :=
begin
intro x,
rw metric.mem_closure_range_iff,
intros ε hε,
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_pow_neg_lt p hε,
use (x.appr n),
rw dist_eq_norm,
apply lt_of_le_of_lt _ hn,
rw norm_le_pow_iff_mem_span_pow,
apply appr_spec,
end
lemma dense_range_int_cast :
dense_range (int.cast : ℤ → ℤ_[p]) :=
begin
intro x,
apply dense_range_nat_cast.induction_on x,
{ exact is_closed_closure, },
{ intro a,
change (a.cast : ℤ_[p]) with (a : ℤ).cast,
apply subset_closure,
exact set.mem_range_self _ }
end
end ring_homs
section lift
/-! ### Universal property as projective limit -/
open cau_seq padic_seq
variables {R : Type*} [comm_ring R] (f : Π k : ℕ, R →+* zmod (p^k))
(f_compat : ∀ k1 k2 (hk : k1 ≤ k2), (zmod.cast_hom (pow_dvd_pow p hk) _).comp (f k2) = f k1)
omit hp_prime
/--
Given a family of ring homs `f : Π n : ℕ, R →+* zmod (p ^ n)`,
`nth_hom f r` is an integer-valued sequence
whose `n`th value is the unique integer `k` such that `0 ≤ k < p ^ n`
and `f n r = (k : zmod (p ^ n))`.
-/
def nth_hom (r : R) : ℕ → ℤ :=
λ n, (f n r : zmod (p^n)).val
@[simp] lemma nth_hom_zero : nth_hom f 0 = 0 :=
by simp [nth_hom]; refl
variable {f}
include hp_prime
include f_compat
lemma pow_dvd_nth_hom_sub (r : R) (i j : ℕ) (h : i ≤ j) :
↑p ^ i ∣ nth_hom f r j - nth_hom f r i :=
begin
specialize f_compat i j h,
rw [← int.coe_nat_pow, ← zmod.int_coe_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd,
int.cast_sub],
dsimp [nth_hom],
rw [← f_compat, ring_hom.comp_apply],
have : fact (p ^ i > 0) := ⟨pow_pos hp_prime.1.pos _⟩,
have : fact (p ^ j > 0) := ⟨pow_pos hp_prime.1.pos _⟩,
unfreezingI { simp only [zmod.cast_id, zmod.cast_hom_apply, sub_self, zmod.nat_cast_val], },
end
lemma is_cau_seq_nth_hom (r : R): is_cau_seq (padic_norm p) (λ n, nth_hom f r n) :=
begin
intros ε hε,
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ : ∃ k : ℕ, (p ^ - (↑(k : ℕ) : ℤ) : ℚ) < ε := exists_pow_neg_lt_rat p hε,
use k,
intros j hj,
refine lt_of_le_of_lt _ hk,
norm_cast,
rw ← padic_norm.dvd_iff_norm_le,
exact_mod_cast pow_dvd_nth_hom_sub f_compat r k j hj
end
/--
`nth_hom_seq f_compat r` bundles `padic_int.nth_hom f r`
as a Cauchy sequence of rationals with respect to the `p`-adic norm.
The `n`th value of the sequence is `((f n r).val : ℚ)`.
-/
def nth_hom_seq (r : R) : padic_seq p := ⟨λ n, nth_hom f r n, is_cau_seq_nth_hom f_compat r⟩
lemma nth_hom_seq_one : nth_hom_seq f_compat 1 ≈ 1 :=
begin
intros ε hε,
change _ < _ at hε,
use 1,
intros j hj,
haveI : fact (1 < p^j) := ⟨nat.one_lt_pow _ _ (by linarith) hp_prime.1.one_lt⟩,
simp [nth_hom_seq, nth_hom, zmod.val_one, hε],
end
lemma nth_hom_seq_add (r s : R) :
nth_hom_seq f_compat (r + s) ≈ nth_hom_seq f_compat r + nth_hom_seq f_compat s :=
begin
intros ε hε,
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_pow_neg_lt_rat p hε,
use n,
intros j hj,
dsimp [nth_hom_seq],
apply lt_of_le_of_lt _ hn,
rw [← int.cast_add, ← int.cast_sub, ← padic_norm.dvd_iff_norm_le,
← zmod.int_coe_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd],
dsimp [nth_hom],
have : fact (p ^ n > 0) := ⟨pow_pos hp_prime.1.pos _⟩,
have : fact (p ^ j > 0) := ⟨pow_pos hp_prime.1.pos _⟩,
unfreezingI
{ simp only [int.cast_coe_nat, int.cast_add, ring_hom.map_add, int.cast_sub, zmod.nat_cast_val] },
rw [zmod.cast_add (show p ^ n ∣ p ^ j, from _), sub_self],
{ apply_instance },
{ apply pow_dvd_pow, linarith only [hj] },
end
lemma nth_hom_seq_mul (r s : R) :
nth_hom_seq f_compat (r * s) ≈ nth_hom_seq f_compat r * nth_hom_seq f_compat s :=
begin
intros ε hε,
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_pow_neg_lt_rat p hε,
use n,
intros j hj,
dsimp [nth_hom_seq],
apply lt_of_le_of_lt _ hn,
rw [← int.cast_mul, ← int.cast_sub, ← padic_norm.dvd_iff_norm_le,
← zmod.int_coe_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd],
dsimp [nth_hom],
have : fact (p ^ n > 0) := ⟨pow_pos hp_prime.1.pos _⟩,
have : fact (p ^ j > 0) := ⟨pow_pos hp_prime.1.pos _⟩,
unfreezingI
{ simp only [int.cast_coe_nat, int.cast_mul, int.cast_sub, ring_hom.map_mul, zmod.nat_cast_val] },
rw [zmod.cast_mul (show p ^ n ∣ p ^ j, from _), sub_self],
{ apply_instance },
{ apply pow_dvd_pow, linarith only [hj] },
end
/--
`lim_nth_hom f_compat r` is the limit of a sequence `f` of compatible ring homs `R →+* zmod (p^k)`.
This is itself a ring hom: see `padic_int.lift`.
-/
def lim_nth_hom (r : R) : ℤ_[p] :=
of_int_seq (nth_hom f r) (is_cau_seq_nth_hom f_compat r)
lemma lim_nth_hom_spec (r : R) :
∀ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε → ∃ N : ℕ, ∀ n ≥ N, ∥lim_nth_hom f_compat r - nth_hom f r n∥ < ε :=
begin
intros ε hε,
obtain ⟨ε', hε'0, hε'⟩ : ∃ v : ℚ, (0 : ℝ) < v ∧ ↑v < ε := exists_rat_btwn hε,
norm_cast at hε'0,
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := padic_norm_e.defn (nth_hom_seq f_compat r) hε'0,
use N,
intros n hn,
apply lt_trans _ hε',
change ↑(padic_norm_e _) < _,
norm_cast,
convert hN _ hn,
simp [nth_hom, lim_nth_hom, nth_hom_seq, of_int_seq],
end
lemma lim_nth_hom_zero : lim_nth_hom f_compat 0 = 0 :=
by simp [lim_nth_hom]; refl
lemma lim_nth_hom_one : lim_nth_hom f_compat 1 = 1 :=
subtype.ext $ quot.sound $ nth_hom_seq_one _
lemma lim_nth_hom_add (r s : R) :
lim_nth_hom f_compat (r + s) = lim_nth_hom f_compat r + lim_nth_hom f_compat s :=
subtype.ext $ quot.sound $ nth_hom_seq_add _ _ _
lemma lim_nth_hom_mul (r s : R) :
lim_nth_hom f_compat (r * s) = lim_nth_hom f_compat r * lim_nth_hom f_compat s :=
subtype.ext $ quot.sound $ nth_hom_seq_mul _ _ _
-- TODO: generalize this to arbitrary complete discrete valuation rings
/--
`lift f_compat` is the limit of a sequence `f` of compatible ring homs `R →+* zmod (p^k)`,
with the equality `lift f_compat r = padic_int.lim_nth_hom f_compat r`.
-/
def lift : R →+* ℤ_[p] :=
{ to_fun := lim_nth_hom f_compat,
map_one' := lim_nth_hom_one f_compat,
map_mul' := lim_nth_hom_mul f_compat,
map_zero' := lim_nth_hom_zero f_compat,
map_add' := lim_nth_hom_add f_compat }
omit f_compat
lemma lift_sub_val_mem_span (r : R) (n : ℕ) :
(lift f_compat r - (f n r).val) ∈ (ideal.span {↑p ^ n} : ideal ℤ_[p]) :=
begin
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := lim_nth_hom_spec f_compat r _
(show (0 : ℝ) < p ^ (-n : ℤ), from nat.zpow_pos_of_pos hp_prime.1.pos _),
have := le_of_lt (hk (max n k) (le_max_right _ _)),
rw norm_le_pow_iff_mem_span_pow at this,
dsimp [lift],
rw sub_eq_sub_add_sub (lim_nth_hom f_compat r) _ ↑(nth_hom f r (max n k)),
apply ideal.add_mem _ _ this,
rw [ideal.mem_span_singleton],
simpa only [ring_hom.eq_int_cast, ring_hom.map_pow, int.cast_sub] using
(int.cast_ring_hom ℤ_[p]).map_dvd
(pow_dvd_nth_hom_sub f_compat r n (max n k) (le_max_left _ _)),
end
/--
One part of the universal property of `ℤ_[p]` as a projective limit.
See also `padic_int.lift_unique`.
-/
lemma lift_spec (n : ℕ) : (to_zmod_pow n).comp (lift f_compat) = f n :=
begin
ext r,
haveI : fact (0 < p ^ n) := ⟨pow_pos hp_prime.1.pos n⟩,
rw [ring_hom.comp_apply, ← zmod.nat_cast_zmod_val (f n r), ← map_nat_cast $ to_zmod_pow n,
← sub_eq_zero, ← ring_hom.map_sub, ← ring_hom.mem_ker, ker_to_zmod_pow],
apply lift_sub_val_mem_span,
end
/--
One part of the universal property of `ℤ_[p]` as a projective limit.
See also `padic_int.lift_spec`.
-/
lemma lift_unique (g : R →+* ℤ_[p]) (hg : ∀ n, (to_zmod_pow n).comp g = f n) :
lift f_compat = g :=
begin
ext1 r,
apply eq_of_forall_dist_le,
intros ε hε,
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_pow_neg_lt p hε,
apply le_trans _ (le_of_lt hn),
rw [dist_eq_norm, norm_le_pow_iff_mem_span_pow, ← ker_to_zmod_pow, ring_hom.mem_ker,
ring_hom.map_sub, ← ring_hom.comp_apply, ← ring_hom.comp_apply, lift_spec, hg, sub_self],
end
@[simp] lemma lift_self (z : ℤ_[p]) : @lift p _ ℤ_[p] _ to_zmod_pow
zmod_cast_comp_to_zmod_pow z = z :=
begin
show _ = ring_hom.id _ z,
rw @lift_unique p _ ℤ_[p] _ _ zmod_cast_comp_to_zmod_pow (ring_hom.id ℤ_[p]),
intro, rw ring_hom.comp_id,
end
end lift
lemma ext_of_to_zmod_pow {x y : ℤ_[p]} :
(∀ n, to_zmod_pow n x = to_zmod_pow n y) ↔ x = y :=
begin
split,
{ intro h,
rw [← lift_self x, ← lift_self y],
simp [lift, lim_nth_hom, nth_hom, h] },
{ rintro rfl _, refl }
end
lemma to_zmod_pow_eq_iff_ext {R : Type*} [comm_ring R] {g g' : R →+* ℤ_[p]} :
(∀ n, (to_zmod_pow n).comp g = (to_zmod_pow n).comp g') ↔ g = g' :=
begin
split,
{ intro hg,
ext x : 1,
apply ext_of_to_zmod_pow.mp,
intro n,
show (to_zmod_pow n).comp g x = (to_zmod_pow n).comp g' x,
rw hg n },
{ rintro rfl _, refl }
end
end padic_int
|
bc0adb6841414b8fe3e673f97a01be4c7b8f4760 | cfdac20f65ed6246e5fc7ce58637507f8945f419 | /library/data/set/basic.lean | c0c4f75f3f7f19cd271d5f1b859621da79f68b6c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | anandadalton/lean | 8623b101ed898c8f4a7a161abd6f8e08d7db57c2 | 37b1e9163d069d12fb4a46b8d3ccfc3081aca645 | refs/heads/master | 1,647,253,997,156 | 1,461,883,971,000 | 1,461,883,971,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 36,195 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import logic.connectives logic.identities algebra.binary
open eq.ops binary function
definition set (X : Type) := X → Prop
namespace set
variable {X : Type}
/- membership and subset -/
definition mem (x : X) (a : set X) := a x
infix ∈ := mem
notation a ∉ b := ¬ mem a b
theorem ext {a b : set X} (H : ∀x, x ∈ a ↔ x ∈ b) : a = b :=
funext (take x, propext (H x))
definition subset (a b : set X) := ∀⦃x⦄, x ∈ a → x ∈ b
infix ⊆ := subset
definition superset (s t : set X) : Prop := t ⊆ s
infix ⊇ := superset
theorem subset.refl (a : set X) : a ⊆ a :=
take x : X,
show x ∈ a → x ∈ a, from
(λ H : x ∈ a, H)
theorem subset.trans {a b c : set X} (subab : a ⊆ b) (subbc : b ⊆ c) : a ⊆ c :=
take x : X,
show x ∈ a → x ∈ c, from
(λ H : x ∈ a, subbc (subab H))
theorem subset.antisymm {a b : set X} (h₁ : a ⊆ b) (h₂ : b ⊆ a) : a = b :=
show a = b, from
have Hf : ∀ x : X, x ∈ a → x ∈ b, from h₁,
have Hb : ∀ x : X, x ∈ b → x ∈ a, from h₂,
have H : ∀ x : X, x ∈ a ↔ x ∈ b, from (λ x : X, iff.intro (Hf x) (Hb x)),
ext H
-- an alternative name
theorem eq_of_subset_of_subset {a b : set X} (h₁ : a ⊆ b) (h₂ : b ⊆ a) : a = b :=
subset.antisymm h₁ h₂
theorem mem_of_subset_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : set X} {a : X} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₂ :=
assume h₁ h₂, h₁ _ h₂
/- strict subset -/
definition strict_subset (a b : set X) := a ⊆ b ∧ a ≠ b
infix ` ⊂ `:50 := strict_subset
theorem strict_subset.irrefl (a : set X) : ¬ a ⊂ a :=
assume h, absurd rfl (and.elim_right h)
/- bounded quantification -/
abbreviation bounded_forall (a : set X) (P : X → Prop) := ∀⦃x⦄, x ∈ a → P x
notation `forallb` binders ` ∈ ` a `, ` r:(scoped:1 P, P) := bounded_forall a r
notation `∀₀` binders ` ∈ ` a `, ` r:(scoped:1 P, P) := bounded_forall a r
abbreviation bounded_exists (a : set X) (P : X → Prop) := ∃⦃x⦄, x ∈ a ∧ P x
notation `existsb` binders ` ∈ ` a `, ` r:(scoped:1 P, P) := bounded_exists a r
notation `∃₀` binders ` ∈ ` a `, ` r:(scoped:1 P, P) := bounded_exists a r
theorem bounded_exists.intro {P : X → Prop} {s : set X} {x : X} (xs : x ∈ s) (Px : P x) :
∃₀ x ∈ s, P x :=
exists.intro x (and.intro xs Px)
lemma bounded_forall_congr {A : Type} {S : set A} {P Q : A → Prop} (H : ∀₀ x ∈ S, P x ↔ Q x) :
(∀₀ x ∈ S, P x) = (∀₀ x ∈ S, Q x) :=
begin
apply propext,
apply forall_congr,
intros x,
apply imp_congr_right,
apply H
end
lemma bounded_exists_congr {A : Type} {S : set A} {P Q : A → Prop} (H : ∀₀ x ∈ S, P x ↔ Q x) :
(∃₀ x ∈ S, P x) = (∃₀ x ∈ S, Q x) :=
begin
apply propext,
apply exists_congr,
intros x,
apply and_congr_right,
apply H
end
section
open classical
lemma not_bounded_exists {A : Type} {S : set A} {P : A → Prop} :
(¬ (∃₀ x ∈ S, P x)) = (∀₀ x ∈ S, ¬ P x) :=
begin
rewrite forall_iff_not_exists,
apply propext,
apply forall_congr,
intro x,
rewrite not_and_iff_not_or_not,
symmetry,
apply imp_iff_not_or
end
lemma not_bounded_forall {A : Type} {S : set A} {P : A → Prop} :
(¬ (∀₀ x ∈ S, P x)) = (∃₀ x ∈ S, ¬ P x) :=
calc (¬ (∀₀ x ∈ S, P x)) = ¬ ¬ (∃₀ x ∈ S, ¬ P x) :
begin
rewrite not_bounded_exists,
apply (congr_arg not),
apply bounded_forall_congr,
intros x H,
rewrite not_not_iff
end
... = (∃₀ x ∈ S, ¬ P x) : by (rewrite not_not_iff)
end
/- empty set -/
definition empty : set X := λx, false
notation `∅` := empty
theorem not_mem_empty (x : X) : ¬ (x ∈ ∅) :=
assume H : x ∈ ∅, H
theorem mem_empty_eq (x : X) : x ∈ ∅ = false := rfl
theorem eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem {s : set X} (H : ∀ x, x ∉ s) : s = ∅ :=
ext (take x, iff.intro
(assume xs, absurd xs (H x))
(assume xe, absurd xe !not_mem_empty))
theorem ne_empty_of_mem {s : set X} {x : X} (H : x ∈ s) : s ≠ ∅ :=
begin intro Hs, rewrite Hs at H, apply not_mem_empty _ H end
section
open classical
theorem exists_mem_of_ne_empty {s : set X} (H : s ≠ ∅) : ∃ x, x ∈ s :=
by_contradiction (assume H', H (eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem (forall_not_of_not_exists H')))
end
theorem empty_subset (s : set X) : ∅ ⊆ s :=
take x, assume H, false.elim H
theorem eq_empty_of_subset_empty {s : set X} (H : s ⊆ ∅) : s = ∅ :=
subset.antisymm H (empty_subset s)
theorem subset_empty_iff (s : set X) : s ⊆ ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
iff.intro eq_empty_of_subset_empty (take xeq, by rewrite xeq; apply subset.refl ∅)
lemma bounded_forall_empty_iff {P : X → Prop} :
(∀₀x∈∅, P x) ↔ true :=
iff.intro (take H, true.intro) (take H, by contradiction)
/- universal set -/
definition univ : set X := λx, true
theorem mem_univ (x : X) : x ∈ univ := trivial
theorem mem_univ_iff (x : X) : x ∈ univ ↔ true := !iff.refl
theorem mem_univ_eq (x : X) : x ∈ univ = true := rfl
theorem empty_ne_univ [h : inhabited X] : (empty : set X) ≠ univ :=
assume H : empty = univ,
absurd (mem_univ (inhabited.value h)) (eq.rec_on H (not_mem_empty _))
theorem subset_univ (s : set X) : s ⊆ univ := λ x H, trivial
theorem eq_univ_of_univ_subset {s : set X} (H : univ ⊆ s) : s = univ :=
eq_of_subset_of_subset (subset_univ s) H
theorem eq_univ_of_forall {s : set X} (H : ∀ x, x ∈ s) : s = univ :=
ext (take x, iff.intro (assume H', trivial) (assume H', H x))
/- union -/
definition union (a b : set X) : set X := λx, x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b
notation a ∪ b := union a b
theorem mem_union_left {x : X} {a : set X} (b : set X) : x ∈ a → x ∈ a ∪ b :=
assume h, or.inl h
theorem mem_union_right {x : X} {b : set X} (a : set X) : x ∈ b → x ∈ a ∪ b :=
assume h, or.inr h
theorem mem_unionl {x : X} {a b : set X} : x ∈ a → x ∈ a ∪ b :=
assume h, or.inl h
theorem mem_unionr {x : X} {a b : set X} : x ∈ b → x ∈ a ∪ b :=
assume h, or.inr h
theorem mem_or_mem_of_mem_union {x : X} {a b : set X} (H : x ∈ a ∪ b) : x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b := H
theorem mem_union.elim {x : X} {a b : set X} {P : Prop}
(H₁ : x ∈ a ∪ b) (H₂ : x ∈ a → P) (H₃ : x ∈ b → P) : P :=
or.elim H₁ H₂ H₃
theorem mem_union_iff (x : X) (a b : set X) : x ∈ a ∪ b ↔ x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b := !iff.refl
theorem mem_union_eq (x : X) (a b : set X) : x ∈ a ∪ b = (x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b) := rfl
theorem union_self (a : set X) : a ∪ a = a :=
ext (take x, !or_self)
theorem union_empty (a : set X) : a ∪ ∅ = a :=
ext (take x, !or_false)
theorem empty_union (a : set X) : ∅ ∪ a = a :=
ext (take x, !false_or)
theorem union_comm (a b : set X) : a ∪ b = b ∪ a :=
ext (take x, or.comm)
theorem union_assoc (a b c : set X) : (a ∪ b) ∪ c = a ∪ (b ∪ c) :=
ext (take x, or.assoc)
theorem union_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : set X) : s₁ ∪ (s₂ ∪ s₃) = s₂ ∪ (s₁ ∪ s₃) :=
!left_comm union_comm union_assoc s₁ s₂ s₃
theorem union_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : set X) : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ∪ s₃ = (s₁ ∪ s₃) ∪ s₂ :=
!right_comm union_comm union_assoc s₁ s₂ s₃
theorem subset_union_left (s t : set X) : s ⊆ s ∪ t := λ x H, or.inl H
theorem subset_union_right (s t : set X) : t ⊆ s ∪ t := λ x H, or.inr H
theorem union_subset {s t r : set X} (sr : s ⊆ r) (tr : t ⊆ r) : s ∪ t ⊆ r :=
λ x xst, or.elim xst (λ xs, sr xs) (λ xt, tr xt)
/- intersection -/
definition inter (a b : set X) : set X := λx, x ∈ a ∧ x ∈ b
notation a ∩ b := inter a b
theorem mem_inter_iff (x : X) (a b : set X) : x ∈ a ∩ b ↔ x ∈ a ∧ x ∈ b := !iff.refl
theorem mem_inter_eq (x : X) (a b : set X) : x ∈ a ∩ b = (x ∈ a ∧ x ∈ b) := rfl
theorem mem_inter {x : X} {a b : set X} (Ha : x ∈ a) (Hb : x ∈ b) : x ∈ a ∩ b :=
and.intro Ha Hb
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_left {x : X} {a b : set X} (H : x ∈ a ∩ b) : x ∈ a :=
and.left H
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_right {x : X} {a b : set X} (H : x ∈ a ∩ b) : x ∈ b :=
and.right H
theorem inter_self (a : set X) : a ∩ a = a :=
ext (take x, !and_self)
theorem inter_empty (a : set X) : a ∩ ∅ = ∅ :=
ext (take x, !and_false)
theorem empty_inter (a : set X) : ∅ ∩ a = ∅ :=
ext (take x, !false_and)
theorem nonempty_of_inter_nonempty_right {T : Type} {s t : set T} (H : s ∩ t ≠ ∅) : t ≠ ∅ :=
suppose t = ∅,
have s ∩ t = ∅, by rewrite this; apply inter_empty,
H this
theorem nonempty_of_inter_nonempty_left {T : Type} {s t : set T} (H : s ∩ t ≠ ∅) : s ≠ ∅ :=
suppose s = ∅,
have s ∩ t = ∅, by rewrite this; apply empty_inter,
H this
theorem inter_comm (a b : set X) : a ∩ b = b ∩ a :=
ext (take x, !and.comm)
theorem inter_assoc (a b c : set X) : (a ∩ b) ∩ c = a ∩ (b ∩ c) :=
ext (take x, !and.assoc)
theorem inter_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : set X) : s₁ ∩ (s₂ ∩ s₃) = s₂ ∩ (s₁ ∩ s₃) :=
!left_comm inter_comm inter_assoc s₁ s₂ s₃
theorem inter_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : set X) : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ∩ s₃ = (s₁ ∩ s₃) ∩ s₂ :=
!right_comm inter_comm inter_assoc s₁ s₂ s₃
theorem inter_univ (a : set X) : a ∩ univ = a :=
ext (take x, !and_true)
theorem univ_inter (a : set X) : univ ∩ a = a :=
ext (take x, !true_and)
theorem inter_subset_left (s t : set X) : s ∩ t ⊆ s := λ x H, and.left H
theorem inter_subset_right (s t : set X) : s ∩ t ⊆ t := λ x H, and.right H
theorem inter_subset_inter_right {s t : set X} (u : set X) (H : s ⊆ t) : s ∩ u ⊆ t ∩ u :=
take x, assume xsu, and.intro (H (and.left xsu)) (and.right xsu)
theorem inter_subset_inter_left {s t : set X} (u : set X) (H : s ⊆ t) : u ∩ s ⊆ u ∩ t :=
take x, assume xus, and.intro (and.left xus) (H (and.right xus))
theorem subset_inter {s t r : set X} (rs : r ⊆ s) (rt : r ⊆ t) : r ⊆ s ∩ t :=
λ x xr, and.intro (rs xr) (rt xr)
theorem not_mem_of_mem_of_not_mem_inter_left {s t : set X} {x : X} (Hxs : x ∈ s) (Hnm : x ∉ s ∩ t) : x ∉ t :=
suppose x ∈ t,
have x ∈ s ∩ t, from and.intro Hxs this,
show false, from Hnm this
theorem not_mem_of_mem_of_not_mem_inter_right {s t : set X} {x : X} (Hxs : x ∈ t) (Hnm : x ∉ s ∩ t) : x ∉ s :=
suppose x ∈ s,
have x ∈ s ∩ t, from and.intro this Hxs,
show false, from Hnm this
/- distributivity laws -/
theorem inter_distrib_left (s t u : set X) : s ∩ (t ∪ u) = (s ∩ t) ∪ (s ∩ u) :=
ext (take x, !and.left_distrib)
theorem inter_distrib_right (s t u : set X) : (s ∪ t) ∩ u = (s ∩ u) ∪ (t ∩ u) :=
ext (take x, !and.right_distrib)
theorem union_distrib_left (s t u : set X) : s ∪ (t ∩ u) = (s ∪ t) ∩ (s ∪ u) :=
ext (take x, !or.left_distrib)
theorem union_distrib_right (s t u : set X) : (s ∩ t) ∪ u = (s ∪ u) ∩ (t ∪ u) :=
ext (take x, !or.right_distrib)
/- set-builder notation -/
-- {x : X | P}
definition set_of (P : X → Prop) : set X := P
notation `{` binder ` | ` r:(scoped:1 P, set_of P) `}` := r
-- {x ∈ s | P}
definition sep (P : X → Prop) (s : set X) : set X := λx, x ∈ s ∧ P x
notation `{` binder ` ∈ ` s ` | ` r:(scoped:1 p, sep p s) `}` := r
/- insert -/
definition insert (x : X) (a : set X) : set X := {y : X | y = x ∨ y ∈ a}
-- '{x, y, z}
notation `'{`:max a:(foldr `, ` (x b, insert x b) ∅) `}`:0 := a
theorem subset_insert (x : X) (a : set X) : a ⊆ insert x a :=
take y, assume ys, or.inr ys
theorem mem_insert (x : X) (s : set X) : x ∈ insert x s :=
or.inl rfl
theorem mem_insert_of_mem {x : X} {s : set X} (y : X) : x ∈ s → x ∈ insert y s :=
assume h, or.inr h
theorem eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert {x a : X} {s : set X} : x ∈ insert a s → x = a ∨ x ∈ s :=
assume h, h
theorem mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne {x a : X} {s : set X} (xin : x ∈ insert a s) : x ≠ a → x ∈ s :=
or_resolve_right (eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert xin)
theorem mem_insert_eq (x a : X) (s : set X) : x ∈ insert a s = (x = a ∨ x ∈ s) :=
propext (iff.intro !eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert
(or.rec (λH', (eq.substr H' !mem_insert)) !mem_insert_of_mem))
theorem insert_eq_of_mem {a : X} {s : set X} (H : a ∈ s) : insert a s = s :=
ext (λ x, eq.substr (mem_insert_eq x a s)
(or_iff_right_of_imp (λH1, eq.substr H1 H)))
theorem insert.comm (x y : X) (s : set X) : insert x (insert y s) = insert y (insert x s) :=
ext (take a, by rewrite [*mem_insert_eq, propext !or.left_comm])
-- useful in proofs by induction
theorem forall_of_forall_insert {P : X → Prop} {a : X} {s : set X}
(H : ∀ x, x ∈ insert a s → P x) :
∀ x, x ∈ s → P x :=
λ x xs, H x (!mem_insert_of_mem xs)
lemma bounded_forall_insert_iff {P : X → Prop} {a : X} {s : set X} :
(∀₀x ∈ insert a s, P x) ↔ P a ∧ (∀₀x ∈ s, P x) :=
begin
apply iff.intro, all_goals (intro H),
{ apply and.intro,
{ apply H, apply mem_insert },
{ intro x Hx, apply H, apply mem_insert_of_mem, assumption } },
{ intro x Hx, cases Hx with eq Hx,
{ cases eq, apply (and.elim_left H) },
{ apply (and.elim_right H), assumption } }
end
/- singleton -/
theorem mem_singleton_iff (a b : X) : a ∈ '{b} ↔ a = b :=
iff.intro
(assume ainb, or.elim ainb (λ aeqb, aeqb) (λ f, false.elim f))
(assume aeqb, or.inl aeqb)
theorem mem_singleton (a : X) : a ∈ '{a} := !mem_insert
theorem eq_of_mem_singleton {x y : X} (h : x ∈ '{y}) : x = y :=
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert h)
(suppose x = y, this)
(suppose x ∈ ∅, absurd this !not_mem_empty)
theorem mem_singleton_of_eq {x y : X} (H : x = y) : x ∈ '{y} :=
eq.symm H ▸ mem_singleton y
theorem insert_eq (x : X) (s : set X) : insert x s = '{x} ∪ s :=
ext (take y, iff.intro
(suppose y ∈ insert x s,
or.elim this (suppose y = x, or.inl (or.inl this)) (suppose y ∈ s, or.inr this))
(suppose y ∈ '{x} ∪ s,
or.elim this
(suppose y ∈ '{x}, or.inl (eq_of_mem_singleton this))
(suppose y ∈ s, or.inr this)))
theorem pair_eq_singleton (a : X) : '{a, a} = '{a} :=
by rewrite [insert_eq_of_mem !mem_singleton]
theorem singleton_ne_empty (a : X) : '{a} ≠ ∅ :=
begin
intro H,
apply not_mem_empty a,
rewrite -H,
apply mem_insert
end
/- separation -/
theorem mem_sep {s : set X} {P : X → Prop} {x : X} (xs : x ∈ s) (Px : P x) : x ∈ {x ∈ s | P x} :=
and.intro xs Px
theorem eq_sep_of_subset {s t : set X} (ssubt : s ⊆ t) : s = {x ∈ t | x ∈ s} :=
ext (take x, iff.intro
(suppose x ∈ s, and.intro (ssubt this) this)
(suppose x ∈ {x ∈ t | x ∈ s}, and.right this))
theorem mem_sep_iff {s : set X} {P : X → Prop} {x : X} : x ∈ {x ∈ s | P x} ↔ x ∈ s ∧ P x :=
!iff.refl
theorem sep_subset (s : set X) (P : X → Prop) : {x ∈ s | P x} ⊆ s :=
take x, assume H, and.left H
theorem forall_not_of_sep_empty {s : set X} {P : X → Prop} (H : {x ∈ s | P x} = ∅) : ∀₀ x ∈ s, ¬ P x :=
take x, suppose x ∈ s, suppose P x,
have x ∈ {x ∈ s | P x}, from and.intro `x ∈ s` this,
show false, from ne_empty_of_mem this H
/- complement -/
definition compl (s : set X) : set X := {x | x ∉ s}
prefix `-` := compl
theorem mem_compl {s : set X} {x : X} (H : x ∉ s) : x ∈ -s := H
theorem not_mem_of_mem_compl {s : set X} {x : X} (H : x ∈ -s) : x ∉ s := H
theorem mem_compl_iff (s : set X) (x : X) : x ∈ -s ↔ x ∉ s := !iff.refl
theorem inter_compl_self (s : set X) : s ∩ -s = ∅ :=
ext (take x, !and_not_self_iff)
theorem compl_inter_self (s : set X) : -s ∩ s = ∅ :=
ext (take x, !not_and_self_iff)
/- some classical identities -/
section
open classical
theorem compl_empty : -(∅ : set X) = univ :=
ext (take x, iff.intro (assume H, trivial) (assume H, not_false))
theorem compl_union (s t : set X) : -(s ∪ t) = -s ∩ -t :=
ext (take x, !not_or_iff_not_and_not)
theorem compl_compl (s : set X) : -(-s) = s :=
ext (take x, !not_not_iff)
theorem compl_inter (s t : set X) : -(s ∩ t) = -s ∪ -t :=
ext (take x, !not_and_iff_not_or_not)
theorem compl_univ : -(univ : set X) = ∅ :=
by rewrite [-compl_empty, compl_compl]
theorem union_eq_compl_compl_inter_compl (s t : set X) : s ∪ t = -(-s ∩ -t) :=
ext (take x, !or_iff_not_and_not)
theorem inter_eq_compl_compl_union_compl (s t : set X) : s ∩ t = -(-s ∪ -t) :=
ext (take x, !and_iff_not_or_not)
theorem union_compl_self (s : set X) : s ∪ -s = univ :=
ext (take x, !or_not_self_iff)
theorem compl_union_self (s : set X) : -s ∪ s = univ :=
ext (take x, !not_or_self_iff)
theorem compl_comp_compl :
#function compl ∘ compl = @id (set X) :=
funext (λ s, compl_compl s)
end
/- set difference -/
definition diff (s t : set X) : set X := {x ∈ s | x ∉ t}
infix `\`:70 := diff
theorem mem_diff {s t : set X} {x : X} (H1 : x ∈ s) (H2 : x ∉ t) : x ∈ s \ t :=
and.intro H1 H2
theorem mem_of_mem_diff {s t : set X} {x : X} (H : x ∈ s \ t) : x ∈ s :=
and.left H
theorem not_mem_of_mem_diff {s t : set X} {x : X} (H : x ∈ s \ t) : x ∉ t :=
and.right H
theorem mem_diff_iff (s t : set X) (x : X) : x ∈ s \ t ↔ x ∈ s ∧ x ∉ t := !iff.refl
theorem mem_diff_eq (s t : set X) (x : X) : x ∈ s \ t = (x ∈ s ∧ x ∉ t) := rfl
theorem diff_eq (s t : set X) : s \ t = s ∩ -t := rfl
theorem union_diff_cancel {s t : set X} [dec : Π x, decidable (x ∈ s)] (H : s ⊆ t) : s ∪ (t \ s) = t :=
ext (take x, iff.intro
(assume H1 : x ∈ s ∪ (t \ s), or.elim H1 (assume H2, !H H2) (assume H2, and.left H2))
(assume H1 : x ∈ t,
decidable.by_cases
(suppose x ∈ s, or.inl this)
(suppose x ∉ s, or.inr (and.intro H1 this))))
theorem diff_subset (s t : set X) : s \ t ⊆ s := inter_subset_left s _
theorem compl_eq_univ_diff (s : set X) : -s = univ \ s :=
ext (take x, iff.intro (assume H, and.intro trivial H) (assume H, and.right H))
/- powerset -/
definition powerset (s : set X) : set (set X) := {x : set X | x ⊆ s}
prefix `𝒫`:100 := powerset
theorem mem_powerset {x s : set X} (H : x ⊆ s) : x ∈ 𝒫 s := H
theorem subset_of_mem_powerset {x s : set X} (H : x ∈ 𝒫 s) : x ⊆ s := H
theorem mem_powerset_iff (x s : set X) : x ∈ 𝒫 s ↔ x ⊆ s := !iff.refl
/- function image -/
section image
variables {Y Z : Type}
abbreviation eq_on (f1 f2 : X → Y) (a : set X) : Prop :=
∀₀ x ∈ a, f1 x = f2 x
definition image (f : X → Y) (a : set X) : set Y := {y : Y | ∃x, x ∈ a ∧ f x = y}
infix ` ' ` := image
theorem image_eq_image_of_eq_on {f1 f2 : X → Y} {a : set X} (H1 : eq_on f1 f2 a) :
f1 ' a = f2 ' a :=
ext (take y, iff.intro
(assume H2,
obtain x (H3 : x ∈ a ∧ f1 x = y), from H2,
have H4 : x ∈ a, from and.left H3,
have H5 : f2 x = y, from (H1 H4)⁻¹ ⬝ and.right H3,
exists.intro x (and.intro H4 H5))
(assume H2,
obtain x (H3 : x ∈ a ∧ f2 x = y), from H2,
have H4 : x ∈ a, from and.left H3,
have H5 : f1 x = y, from (H1 H4) ⬝ and.right H3,
exists.intro x (and.intro H4 H5)))
theorem mem_image {f : X → Y} {a : set X} {x : X} {y : Y}
(H1 : x ∈ a) (H2 : f x = y) : y ∈ f ' a :=
exists.intro x (and.intro H1 H2)
theorem mem_image_of_mem (f : X → Y) {x : X} {a : set X} (H : x ∈ a) : f x ∈ image f a :=
mem_image H rfl
lemma image_comp (f : Y → Z) (g : X → Y) (a : set X) : (f ∘ g) ' a = f ' (g ' a) :=
ext (take z,
iff.intro
(assume Hz : z ∈ (f ∘ g) ' a,
obtain x (Hx₁ : x ∈ a) (Hx₂ : f (g x) = z), from Hz,
have Hgx : g x ∈ g ' a, from mem_image Hx₁ rfl,
show z ∈ f ' (g ' a), from mem_image Hgx Hx₂)
(assume Hz : z ∈ f ' (g 'a),
obtain y (Hy₁ : y ∈ g ' a) (Hy₂ : f y = z), from Hz,
obtain x (Hz₁ : x ∈ a) (Hz₂ : g x = y), from Hy₁,
show z ∈ (f ∘ g) ' a, from mem_image Hz₁ (Hz₂⁻¹ ▸ Hy₂)))
lemma image_subset {a b : set X} (f : X → Y) (H : a ⊆ b) : f ' a ⊆ f ' b :=
take y, assume Hy : y ∈ f ' a,
obtain x (Hx₁ : x ∈ a) (Hx₂ : f x = y), from Hy,
mem_image (H Hx₁) Hx₂
theorem image_union (f : X → Y) (s t : set X) :
image f (s ∪ t) = image f s ∪ image f t :=
ext (take y, iff.intro
(assume H : y ∈ image f (s ∪ t),
obtain x [(xst : x ∈ s ∪ t) (fxy : f x = y)], from H,
or.elim xst
(assume xs, or.inl (mem_image xs fxy))
(assume xt, or.inr (mem_image xt fxy)))
(assume H : y ∈ image f s ∪ image f t,
or.elim H
(assume yifs : y ∈ image f s,
obtain x [(xs : x ∈ s) (fxy : f x = y)], from yifs,
mem_image (or.inl xs) fxy)
(assume yift : y ∈ image f t,
obtain x [(xt : x ∈ t) (fxy : f x = y)], from yift,
mem_image (or.inr xt) fxy)))
theorem image_empty (f : X → Y) : image f ∅ = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem
(take y, suppose y ∈ image f ∅,
obtain x [(H : x ∈ empty) H'], from this,
H)
theorem mem_image_compl (t : set X) (S : set (set X)) :
t ∈ compl ' S ↔ -t ∈ S :=
iff.intro
(suppose t ∈ compl ' S,
obtain t' [(Ht' : t' ∈ S) (Ht : -t' = t)], from this,
show -t ∈ S, by rewrite [-Ht, compl_compl]; exact Ht')
(suppose -t ∈ S,
have -(-t) ∈ compl 'S, from mem_image_of_mem compl this,
show t ∈ compl 'S, from compl_compl t ▸ this)
theorem image_id (s : set X) : id ' s = s :=
ext (take x, iff.intro
(suppose x ∈ id ' s,
obtain x' [(Hx' : x' ∈ s) (x'eq : x' = x)], from this,
show x ∈ s, by rewrite [-x'eq]; apply Hx')
(suppose x ∈ s, mem_image_of_mem id this))
theorem compl_compl_image (S : set (set X)) :
compl ' (compl ' S) = S :=
by rewrite [-image_comp, compl_comp_compl, image_id]
lemma bounded_forall_image_of_bounded_forall {f : X → Y} {S : set X} {P : Y → Prop}
(H : ∀₀ x ∈ S, P (f x)) : ∀₀ y ∈ f ' S, P y :=
begin
intro x' Hx;
cases Hx with x Hx;
cases Hx with Hx eq;
rewrite (eq⁻¹);
apply H;
assumption
end
lemma bounded_forall_image_iff {f : X → Y} {S : set X} {P : Y → Prop} :
(∀₀ y ∈ f ' S, P y) ↔ (∀₀ x ∈ S, P (f x)) :=
iff.intro (take H x Hx, H _ (!mem_image_of_mem `x ∈ S`)) bounded_forall_image_of_bounded_forall
lemma image_insert_eq {f : X → Y} {a : X} {S : set X} :
f ' insert a S = insert (f a) (f ' S) :=
begin
apply set.ext,
intro x, apply iff.intro, all_goals (intros H),
{ cases H with y Hy, cases Hy with Hy eq, rewrite (eq⁻¹), cases Hy with y_eq,
{ rewrite y_eq, apply mem_insert },
{ apply mem_insert_of_mem, apply mem_image_of_mem, assumption } },
{ cases H with eq Hx,
{ rewrite eq, apply mem_image_of_mem, apply mem_insert },
{ cases Hx with y Hy, cases Hy with Hy eq,
rewrite (eq⁻¹), apply mem_image_of_mem, apply mem_insert_of_mem, assumption } }
end
end image
/- collections of disjoint sets -/
definition disjoint_sets (S : set (set X)) : Prop := ∀ a b, a ∈ S → b ∈ S → a ≠ b → a ∩ b = ∅
theorem disjoint_sets_empty : disjoint_sets (∅ : set (set X)) :=
take a b, assume H, !not.elim !not_mem_empty H
theorem disjoint_sets_union {s t : set (set X)} (Hs : disjoint_sets s) (Ht : disjoint_sets t)
(H : ∀ x y, x ∈ s ∧ y ∈ t → x ∩ y = ∅) :
disjoint_sets (s ∪ t) :=
take a b, assume Ha Hb Hneq, or.elim Ha
(assume H1, or.elim Hb
(suppose b ∈ s, (Hs a b) H1 this Hneq)
(suppose b ∈ t, (H a b) (and.intro H1 this)))
(assume H2, or.elim Hb
(suppose b ∈ s, !inter_comm ▸ ((H b a) (and.intro this H2)))
(suppose b ∈ t, (Ht a b) H2 this Hneq))
theorem disjoint_sets_singleton (s : set (set X)) : disjoint_sets '{s} :=
take a b, assume Ha Hb Hneq,
absurd (eq.trans ((iff.elim_left !mem_singleton_iff) Ha) ((iff.elim_left !mem_singleton_iff) Hb)⁻¹)
Hneq
/- large unions -/
section large_unions
variables {I : Type}
variable a : set I
variable b : I → set X
variable C : set (set X)
definition sUnion : set X := {x : X | ∃₀ c ∈ C, x ∈ c}
definition sInter : set X := {x : X | ∀₀ c ∈ C, x ∈ c}
prefix `⋃₀`:110 := sUnion
prefix `⋂₀`:110 := sInter
definition Union : set X := {x : X | ∃i, x ∈ b i}
definition Inter : set X := {x : X | ∀i, x ∈ b i}
notation `⋃` binders `, ` r:(scoped f, Union f) := r
notation `⋂` binders `, ` r:(scoped f, Inter f) := r
definition bUnion : set X := {x : X | ∃₀ i ∈ a, x ∈ b i}
definition bInter : set X := {x : X | ∀₀ i ∈ a, x ∈ b i}
notation `⋃` binders ` ∈ ` s `, ` r:(scoped f, bUnion s f) := r
notation `⋂` binders ` ∈ ` s `, ` r:(scoped f, bInter s f) := r
end large_unions
-- sUnion and sInter: a collection (set) of sets
theorem mem_sUnion {x : X} {t : set X} {S : set (set X)} (Hx : x ∈ t) (Ht : t ∈ S) :
x ∈ ⋃₀ S :=
exists.intro t (and.intro Ht Hx)
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_sUnion {x : X} {t : set X} {S : set (set X)} (Hx : x ∉ ⋃₀ S) (Ht : t ∈ S) :
x ∉ t :=
suppose x ∈ t,
have x ∈ ⋃₀ S, from mem_sUnion this Ht,
show false, from Hx this
theorem mem_sInter {x : X} {t : set X} {S : set (set X)} (H : ∀₀ t ∈ S, x ∈ t) :
x ∈ ⋂₀ S :=
H
theorem sInter_subset_of_mem {S : set (set X)} {t : set X} (tS : t ∈ S) :
(⋂₀ S) ⊆ t :=
take x, assume H, H t tS
theorem subset_sUnion_of_mem {S : set (set X)} {t : set X} (tS : t ∈ S) :
t ⊆ (⋃₀ S) :=
take x, assume H, exists.intro t (and.intro tS H)
theorem sUnion_empty : ⋃₀ ∅ = (∅ : set X) :=
eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem
(take x, suppose x ∈ sUnion ∅,
obtain t [(Ht : t ∈ ∅) Ht'], from this,
show false, from Ht)
theorem sInter_empty : ⋂₀ ∅ = (univ : set X) :=
eq_univ_of_forall (λ x s H, false.elim H)
theorem sUnion_singleton (s : set X) : ⋃₀ '{s} = s :=
ext (take x, iff.intro
(suppose x ∈ sUnion '{s},
obtain u [(Hu : u ∈ '{s}) (xu : x ∈ u)], from this,
have u = s, from eq_of_mem_singleton Hu,
show x ∈ s, by rewrite -this; apply xu)
(suppose x ∈ s,
mem_sUnion this (mem_singleton s)))
theorem sInter_singleton (s : set X) : ⋂₀ '{s} = s :=
ext (take x, iff.intro
(suppose x ∈ ⋂₀ '{s}, show x ∈ s, from this (mem_singleton s))
(suppose x ∈ s, take u, suppose u ∈ '{s},
show x ∈ u, by rewrite [eq_of_mem_singleton this]; assumption))
theorem sUnion_union (S T : set (set X)) : ⋃₀ (S ∪ T) = ⋃₀ S ∪ ⋃₀ T :=
ext (take x, iff.intro
(suppose x ∈ sUnion (S ∪ T),
obtain u [(Hu : u ∈ S ∪ T) (xu : x ∈ u)], from this,
or.elim Hu
(assume uS, or.inl (mem_sUnion xu uS))
(assume uT, or.inr (mem_sUnion xu uT)))
(suppose x ∈ sUnion S ∪ sUnion T,
or.elim this
(suppose x ∈ sUnion S,
obtain u [(uS : u ∈ S) (xu : x ∈ u)], from this,
mem_sUnion xu (or.inl uS))
(suppose x ∈ sUnion T,
obtain u [(uT : u ∈ T) (xu : x ∈ u)], from this,
mem_sUnion xu (or.inr uT))))
theorem sInter_union (S T : set (set X)) : ⋂₀ (S ∪ T) = ⋂₀ S ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
ext (take x, iff.intro
(assume H : x ∈ ⋂₀ (S ∪ T),
and.intro (λ u uS, H (or.inl uS)) (λ u uT, H (or.inr uT)))
(assume H : x ∈ ⋂₀ S ∩ ⋂₀ T,
take u, suppose u ∈ S ∪ T, or.elim this (λ uS, and.left H u uS) (λ uT, and.right H u uT)))
theorem sUnion_insert (s : set X) (T : set (set X)) :
⋃₀ (insert s T) = s ∪ ⋃₀ T :=
by rewrite [insert_eq, sUnion_union, sUnion_singleton]
theorem sInter_insert (s : set X) (T : set (set X)) :
⋂₀ (insert s T) = s ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
by rewrite [insert_eq, sInter_union, sInter_singleton]
theorem compl_sUnion (S : set (set X)) :
- ⋃₀ S = ⋂₀ (compl ' S) :=
ext (take x, iff.intro
(assume H : x ∈ -(⋃₀ S),
take t, suppose t ∈ compl ' S,
obtain t' [(Ht' : t' ∈ S) (Ht : -t' = t)], from this,
have x ∈ -t', from suppose x ∈ t', H (mem_sUnion this Ht'),
show x ∈ t, by rewrite -Ht; apply this)
(assume H : x ∈ ⋂₀ (compl ' S),
suppose x ∈ ⋃₀ S,
obtain t [(tS : t ∈ S) (xt : x ∈ t)], from this,
have -t ∈ compl ' S, from mem_image_of_mem compl tS,
have x ∈ -t, from H this,
show false, proof this xt qed))
theorem sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl (S : set (set X)) :
⋃₀ S = - ⋂₀ (compl ' S) :=
by rewrite [-compl_compl (⋃₀ S), compl_sUnion]
theorem compl_sInter (S : set (set X)) :
- ⋂₀ S = ⋃₀ (compl ' S) :=
by rewrite [sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl, compl_compl_image]
theorem sInter_eq_comp_sUnion_compl (S : set (set X)) :
⋂₀ S = -(⋃₀ (compl ' S)) :=
by rewrite [-compl_compl (⋂₀ S), compl_sInter]
theorem inter_sUnion_nonempty_of_inter_nonempty {s t : set X} {S : set (set X)} (Hs : t ∈ S) (Hne : s ∩ t ≠ ∅) :
s ∩ ⋃₀ S ≠ ∅ :=
obtain x Hsx Htx, from exists_mem_of_ne_empty Hne,
have x ∈ ⋃₀ S, from mem_sUnion Htx Hs,
ne_empty_of_mem (mem_inter Hsx this)
theorem sUnion_inter_nonempty_of_inter_nonempty {s t : set X} {S : set (set X)} (Hs : t ∈ S) (Hne : t ∩ s ≠ ∅) :
(⋃₀ S) ∩ s ≠ ∅ :=
obtain x Htx Hsx, from exists_mem_of_ne_empty Hne,
have x ∈ ⋃₀ S, from mem_sUnion Htx Hs,
ne_empty_of_mem (mem_inter this Hsx)
-- Union and Inter: a family of sets indexed by a type
theorem Union_subset {I : Type} {b : I → set X} {c : set X} (H : ∀ i, b i ⊆ c) : (⋃ i, b i) ⊆ c :=
take x,
suppose x ∈ Union b,
obtain i (Hi : x ∈ b i), from this,
show x ∈ c, from H i Hi
theorem subset_Inter {I : Type} {b : I → set X} {c : set X} (H : ∀ i, c ⊆ b i) : c ⊆ ⋂ i, b i :=
λ x cx i, H i cx
theorem Union_eq_sUnion_image {X I : Type} (s : I → set X) : (⋃ i, s i) = ⋃₀ (s ' univ) :=
ext (take x, iff.intro
(suppose x ∈ Union s,
obtain i (Hi : x ∈ s i), from this,
mem_sUnion Hi (mem_image_of_mem s trivial))
(suppose x ∈ sUnion (s ' univ),
obtain t [(Ht : t ∈ s ' univ) (Hx : x ∈ t)], from this,
obtain i [univi (Hi : s i = t)], from Ht,
exists.intro i (show x ∈ s i, by rewrite Hi; apply Hx)))
theorem Inter_eq_sInter_image {X I : Type} (s : I → set X) : (⋂ i, s i) = ⋂₀ (s ' univ) :=
ext (take x, iff.intro
(assume H : x ∈ Inter s,
take t,
suppose t ∈ s 'univ,
obtain i [univi (Hi : s i = t)], from this,
show x ∈ t, by rewrite -Hi; exact H i)
(assume H : x ∈ ⋂₀ (s ' univ),
take i,
have s i ∈ s ' univ, from mem_image_of_mem s trivial,
show x ∈ s i, from H this))
theorem compl_Union {X I : Type} (s : I → set X) : - (⋃ i, s i) = (⋂ i, - s i) :=
by rewrite [Union_eq_sUnion_image, compl_sUnion, -image_comp, -Inter_eq_sInter_image]
theorem compl_Inter {X I : Type} (s : I → set X) : -(⋂ i, s i) = (⋃ i, - s i) :=
by rewrite [Inter_eq_sInter_image, compl_sInter, -image_comp, -Union_eq_sUnion_image]
theorem Union_eq_comp_Inter_comp {X I : Type} (s : I → set X) : (⋃ i, s i) = - (⋂ i, - s i) :=
by rewrite [-compl_compl (⋃ i, s i), compl_Union]
theorem Inter_eq_comp_Union_comp {X I : Type} (s : I → set X) : (⋂ i, s i) = - (⋃ i, -s i) :=
by rewrite [-compl_compl (⋂ i, s i), compl_Inter]
lemma inter_distrib_Union_left {X I : Type} (s : I → set X) (a : set X) :
a ∩ (⋃ i, s i) = ⋃ i, a ∩ s i :=
ext (take x, iff.intro
(assume H, obtain i Hi, from and.elim_right H,
have x ∈ a ∩ s i, from and.intro (and.elim_left H) Hi,
show _, from exists.intro i this)
(assume H, obtain i [xa xsi], from H,
show _, from and.intro xa (exists.intro i xsi)))
section
open classical
lemma union_distrib_Inter_left {X I : Type} (s : I → set X) (a : set X) :
a ∪ (⋂ i, s i) = ⋂ i, a ∪ s i :=
ext (take x, iff.intro
(assume H, or.elim H
(assume H1, take i, or.inl H1)
(assume H1, take i, or.inr (H1 i)))
(assume H,
by_cases
(suppose x ∈ a, or.inl this)
(suppose x ∉ a, or.inr (take i, or.resolve_left (H i) this))))
end
-- these are useful for turning binary union / intersection into countable ones
definition bin_ext (s t : set X) (n : ℕ) : set X :=
nat.cases_on n s (λ m, t)
lemma Union_bin_ext (s t : set X) : (⋃ i, bin_ext s t i) = s ∪ t :=
ext (take x, iff.intro
(assume H,
obtain i (Hi : x ∈ (bin_ext s t) i), from H,
by cases i; apply or.inl Hi; apply or.inr Hi)
(assume H,
or.elim H
(suppose x ∈ s, exists.intro 0 this)
(suppose x ∈ t, exists.intro 1 this)))
lemma Inter_bin_ext (s t : set X) : (⋂ i, bin_ext s t i) = s ∩ t :=
ext (take x, iff.intro
(assume H, and.intro (H 0) (H 1))
(assume H, by intro i; cases i;
apply and.elim_left H; apply and.elim_right H))
-- bUnion and bInter: a family of sets indexed by a set ("b" is for bounded)
variable {Y : Type}
theorem mem_bUnion {s : set X} {f : X → set Y} {x : X} {y : Y}
(xs : x ∈ s) (yfx : y ∈ f x) :
y ∈ ⋃ x ∈ s, f x :=
exists.intro x (and.intro xs yfx)
theorem mem_bInter {s : set X} {f : X → set Y} {y : Y} (H : ∀₀ x ∈ s, y ∈ f x) :
y ∈ ⋂ x ∈ s, f x :=
H
theorem bUnion_subset {s : set X} {t : set Y} {f : X → set Y} (H : ∀₀ x ∈ s, f x ⊆ t) :
(⋃ x ∈ s, f x) ⊆ t :=
take y, assume Hy,
obtain x [xs yfx], from Hy,
show y ∈ t, from H xs yfx
theorem subset_bInter {s : set X} {t : set Y} {f : X → set Y} (H : ∀₀ x ∈ s, t ⊆ f x) :
t ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s, f x :=
take y, assume yt, take x, assume xs, H xs yt
theorem subset_bUnion_of_mem {s : set X} {f : X → set Y} {x : X} (xs : x ∈ s) :
f x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, f x :=
take y, assume Hy, mem_bUnion xs Hy
theorem bInter_subset_of_mem {s : set X} {f : X → set Y} {x : X} (xs : x ∈ s) :
(⋂ x ∈ s, f x) ⊆ f x :=
take y, assume Hy, Hy x xs
theorem bInter_empty (f : X → set Y) : (⋂ x ∈ (∅ : set X), f x) = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall (take y x xine, absurd xine !not_mem_empty)
theorem bInter_singleton (a : X) (f : X → set Y) : (⋂ x ∈ '{a}, f x) = f a :=
ext (take y, iff.intro
(assume H, H a !mem_singleton)
(assume H, λ x xa, by rewrite [eq_of_mem_singleton xa]; apply H))
theorem bInter_union (s t : set X) (f : X → set Y) :
(⋂ x ∈ s ∪ t, f x) = (⋂ x ∈ s, f x) ∩ (⋂ x ∈ t, f x) :=
ext (take y, iff.intro
(assume H, and.intro (λ x xs, H x (or.inl xs)) (λ x xt, H x (or.inr xt)))
(assume H, λ x xst, or.elim (xst) (λ xs, and.left H x xs) (λ xt, and.right H x xt)))
theorem bInter_insert (a : X) (s : set X) (f : X → set Y) :
(⋂ x ∈ insert a s, f x) = f a ∩ (⋂ x ∈ s, f x) :=
by rewrite [insert_eq, bInter_union, bInter_singleton]
theorem bInter_pair (a b : X) (f : X → set Y) :
(⋂ x ∈ '{a, b}, f x) = f a ∩ f b :=
by rewrite [*bInter_insert, bInter_empty, inter_univ]
theorem bUnion_empty (f : X → set Y) : (⋃ x ∈ (∅ : set X), f x) = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem (λ y H, obtain x [xine yfx], from H,
!not_mem_empty xine)
theorem bUnion_singleton (a : X) (f : X → set Y) : (⋃ x ∈ '{a}, f x) = f a :=
ext (take y, iff.intro
(assume H, obtain x [xina yfx], from H,
show y ∈ f a, by rewrite [-eq_of_mem_singleton xina]; exact yfx)
(assume H, exists.intro a (and.intro !mem_singleton H)))
theorem bUnion_union (s t : set X) (f : X → set Y) :
(⋃ x ∈ s ∪ t, f x) = (⋃ x ∈ s, f x) ∪ (⋃ x ∈ t, f x) :=
ext (take y, iff.intro
(assume H, obtain x [xst yfx], from H,
or.elim xst
(λ xs, or.inl (exists.intro x (and.intro xs yfx)))
(λ xt, or.inr (exists.intro x (and.intro xt yfx))))
(assume H, or.elim H
(assume H1, obtain x [xs yfx], from H1,
exists.intro x (and.intro (or.inl xs) yfx))
(assume H1, obtain x [xt yfx], from H1,
exists.intro x (and.intro (or.inr xt) yfx))))
theorem bUnion_insert (a : X) (s : set X) (f : X → set Y) :
(⋃ x ∈ insert a s, f x) = f a ∪ (⋃ x ∈ s, f x) :=
by rewrite [insert_eq, bUnion_union, bUnion_singleton]
theorem bUnion_pair (a b : X) (f : X → set Y) :
(⋃ x ∈ '{a, b}, f x) = f a ∪ f b :=
by rewrite [*bUnion_insert, bUnion_empty, union_empty]
end set
|
0401f8d968bae741933b608eeb00f0a9864a70f6 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/inlineIfReduceLCNF.lean | 78b4343567fa764260209b877aaec082319daf80 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 141 | lean | import Lean
def f (x y z : Nat) : Array Nat :=
#[x, y, z, y, x]
set_option trace.Compiler.result true
#eval Lean.Compiler.compile #[``f]
|
549602c4ab77d73b8513382446de732ac52918bd | f4bff2062c030df03d65e8b69c88f79b63a359d8 | /src/game/cardinality/countable_inj.lean | 53fe8bad40e38e0bb6ef196b397025d1f2b20e69 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | adastra7470/real-number-game | 776606961f52db0eb824555ed2f8e16f92216ea3 | f9dcb7d9255a79b57e62038228a23346c2dc301b | refs/heads/master | 1,669,221,575,893 | 1,594,669,800,000 | 1,594,669,800,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 917 | lean | import data.real.basic
import topology.basic
open function
open set
namespace xena -- hide
/-
# Chapter 7 : Cardinality
## Level 3
A classical result about countable sets.
-/
/- Lemma
If $f : X \to Y$ is an injective function and $Y$ is countable, then
$X$ is also countable.
-/
theorem countable_inj (X Y : set ℝ) (f : X → Y) (hY : countable Y) :
injective f → countable X :=
begin
intro hf,
have H := countable_iff_exists_injective.1 hY,
cases H with g hg,
have G := countable_iff_exists_injective.2 ⟨g ∘ f, injective.comp hg hf⟩,
exact G, done
end
end xena -- hide
-- begin hide
-- term mode proof due to Kenny Lau
theorem countable_inj_2 (X Y : set ℝ) (f : X → Y) (hY : countable Y) :
injective f → countable X :=
λ hf, let ⟨g, hg⟩ := countable_iff_exists_injective.1 hY in
countable_iff_exists_injective.2 ⟨g ∘ f, injective.comp hg hf⟩
-- end hide
|
10884a64b22e707410a975b7d5cb6518343f87b7 | b561a44b48979a98df50ade0789a21c79ee31288 | /src/Init/Meta.lean | 9f91448da8233e2c3cedab76859af2d3510454e5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | 3401ijk/lean4 | 97659c475ebd33a034fed515cb83a85f75ccfb06 | a5b1b8de4f4b038ff752b9e607b721f15a9a4351 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,933,007,651 | 1,636,424,845,000 | 1,636,424,845,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 33,981 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura and Sebastian Ullrich
Additional goodies for writing macros
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Array.Basic
namespace Lean
@[extern c inline "lean_box(LEAN_VERSION_MAJOR)"]
private constant version.getMajor (u : Unit) : Nat
def version.major : Nat := version.getMajor ()
@[extern c inline "lean_box(LEAN_VERSION_MINOR)"]
private constant version.getMinor (u : Unit) : Nat
def version.minor : Nat := version.getMinor ()
@[extern c inline "lean_box(LEAN_VERSION_PATCH)"]
private constant version.getPatch (u : Unit) : Nat
def version.patch : Nat := version.getPatch ()
@[extern "lean_get_githash"]
constant getGithash (u : Unit) : String
def githash : String := getGithash ()
@[extern c inline "LEAN_VERSION_IS_RELEASE"]
constant version.getIsRelease (u : Unit) : Bool
def version.isRelease : Bool := version.getIsRelease ()
/-- Additional version description like "nightly-2018-03-11" -/
@[extern c inline "lean_mk_string(LEAN_SPECIAL_VERSION_DESC)"]
constant version.getSpecialDesc (u : Unit) : String
def version.specialDesc : String := version.getSpecialDesc ()
/- Valid identifier names -/
def isGreek (c : Char) : Bool :=
0x391 ≤ c.val && c.val ≤ 0x3dd
def isLetterLike (c : Char) : Bool :=
(0x3b1 ≤ c.val && c.val ≤ 0x3c9 && c.val ≠ 0x3bb) || -- Lower greek, but lambda
(0x391 ≤ c.val && c.val ≤ 0x3A9 && c.val ≠ 0x3A0 && c.val ≠ 0x3A3) || -- Upper greek, but Pi and Sigma
(0x3ca ≤ c.val && c.val ≤ 0x3fb) || -- Coptic letters
(0x1f00 ≤ c.val && c.val ≤ 0x1ffe) || -- Polytonic Greek Extended Character Set
(0x2100 ≤ c.val && c.val ≤ 0x214f) || -- Letter like block
(0x1d49c ≤ c.val && c.val ≤ 0x1d59f) -- Latin letters, Script, Double-struck, Fractur
def isNumericSubscript (c : Char) : Bool :=
0x2080 ≤ c.val && c.val ≤ 0x2089
def isSubScriptAlnum (c : Char) : Bool :=
isNumericSubscript c ||
(0x2090 ≤ c.val && c.val ≤ 0x209c) ||
(0x1d62 ≤ c.val && c.val ≤ 0x1d6a)
def isIdFirst (c : Char) : Bool :=
c.isAlpha || c = '_' || isLetterLike c
def isIdRest (c : Char) : Bool :=
c.isAlphanum || c = '_' || c = '\'' || c == '!' || c == '?' || isLetterLike c || isSubScriptAlnum c
def idBeginEscape := '«'
def idEndEscape := '»'
def isIdBeginEscape (c : Char) : Bool := c = idBeginEscape
def isIdEndEscape (c : Char) : Bool := c = idEndEscape
namespace Name
def getRoot : Name → Name
| anonymous => anonymous
| n@(str anonymous _ _) => n
| n@(num anonymous _ _) => n
| str n _ _ => getRoot n
| num n _ _ => getRoot n
@[export lean_is_inaccessible_user_name]
def isInaccessibleUserName : Name → Bool
| Name.str _ s _ => s.contains '✝' || s == "_inaccessible"
| Name.num p idx _ => isInaccessibleUserName p
| _ => false
def escapePart (s : String) : Option String :=
if s.length > 0 && isIdFirst s[0] && (s.toSubstring.drop 1).all isIdRest then s
else if s.any isIdEndEscape then none
else some <| idBeginEscape.toString ++ s ++ idEndEscape.toString
-- NOTE: does not roundtrip even with `escape = true` if name is anonymous or contains numeric part or `idEndEscape`
variable (sep : String) (escape : Bool)
def toStringWithSep : Name → String
| anonymous => "[anonymous]"
| str anonymous s _ => maybeEscape s
| num anonymous v _ => toString v
| str n s _ => toStringWithSep n ++ sep ++ maybeEscape s
| num n v _ => toStringWithSep n ++ sep ++ Nat.repr v
where
maybeEscape s := if escape then escapePart s |>.getD s else s
protected def toString (n : Name) (escape := true) : String :=
-- never escape "prettified" inaccessible names or macro scopes or pseudo-syntax introduced by the delaborator
toStringWithSep "." (escape && !n.isInaccessibleUserName && !n.hasMacroScopes && !maybePseudoSyntax) n
where
maybePseudoSyntax :=
if let Name.str _ s _ := n.getRoot then
-- could be pseudo-syntax for loose bvar or universe mvar, output as is
"#".isPrefixOf s || "?".isPrefixOf s
else
false
instance : ToString Name where
toString n := n.toString
private def hasNum : Name → Bool
| anonymous => false
| num .. => true
| str p .. => hasNum p
protected def reprPrec (n : Name) (prec : Nat) : Std.Format :=
match n with
| anonymous => Std.Format.text "Lean.Name.anonymous"
| num p i _ => Repr.addAppParen ("Lean.Name.mkNum " ++ Name.reprPrec p max_prec ++ " " ++ repr i) prec
| str p s _ =>
if p.hasNum then
Repr.addAppParen ("Lean.Name.mkStr " ++ Name.reprPrec p max_prec ++ " " ++ repr s) prec
else
Std.Format.text "`" ++ n.toString
instance : Repr Name where
reprPrec := Name.reprPrec
deriving instance Repr for Syntax
def capitalize : Name → Name
| Name.str p s _ => Name.mkStr p s.capitalize
| n => n
def replacePrefix : Name → Name → Name → Name
| anonymous, anonymous, newP => newP
| anonymous, _, _ => anonymous
| n@(str p s _), queryP, newP => if n == queryP then newP else Name.mkStr (p.replacePrefix queryP newP) s
| n@(num p s _), queryP, newP => if n == queryP then newP else Name.mkNum (p.replacePrefix queryP newP) s
/-- Remove macros scopes, apply `f`, and put them back -/
@[inline] def modifyBase (n : Name) (f : Name → Name) : Name :=
if n.hasMacroScopes then
let view := extractMacroScopes n
{ view with name := f view.name }.review
else
f n
@[export lean_name_append_after]
def appendAfter (n : Name) (suffix : String) : Name :=
n.modifyBase fun
| str p s _ => Name.mkStr p (s ++ suffix)
| n => Name.mkStr n suffix
@[export lean_name_append_index_after]
def appendIndexAfter (n : Name) (idx : Nat) : Name :=
n.modifyBase fun
| str p s _ => Name.mkStr p (s ++ "_" ++ toString idx)
| n => Name.mkStr n ("_" ++ toString idx)
@[export lean_name_append_before]
def appendBefore (n : Name) (pre : String) : Name :=
n.modifyBase fun
| anonymous => Name.mkStr anonymous pre
| str p s _ => Name.mkStr p (pre ++ s)
| num p n _ => Name.mkNum (Name.mkStr p pre) n
end Name
structure NameGenerator where
namePrefix : Name := `_uniq
idx : Nat := 1
deriving Inhabited
namespace NameGenerator
@[inline] def curr (g : NameGenerator) : Name :=
Name.mkNum g.namePrefix g.idx
@[inline] def next (g : NameGenerator) : NameGenerator :=
{ g with idx := g.idx + 1 }
@[inline] def mkChild (g : NameGenerator) : NameGenerator × NameGenerator :=
({ namePrefix := Name.mkNum g.namePrefix g.idx, idx := 1 },
{ g with idx := g.idx + 1 })
end NameGenerator
class MonadNameGenerator (m : Type → Type) where
getNGen : m NameGenerator
setNGen : NameGenerator → m Unit
export MonadNameGenerator (getNGen setNGen)
def mkFreshId {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] [MonadNameGenerator m] : m Name := do
let ngen ← getNGen
let r := ngen.curr
setNGen ngen.next
pure r
instance monadNameGeneratorLift (m n : Type → Type) [MonadLift m n] [MonadNameGenerator m] : MonadNameGenerator n := {
getNGen := liftM (getNGen : m _),
setNGen := fun ngen => liftM (setNGen ngen : m _)
}
namespace Syntax
partial def structEq : Syntax → Syntax → Bool
| Syntax.missing, Syntax.missing => true
| Syntax.node _ k args, Syntax.node _ k' args' => k == k' && args.isEqv args' structEq
| Syntax.atom _ val, Syntax.atom _ val' => val == val'
| Syntax.ident _ rawVal val preresolved, Syntax.ident _ rawVal' val' preresolved' => rawVal == rawVal' && val == val' && preresolved == preresolved'
| _, _ => false
instance : BEq Lean.Syntax := ⟨structEq⟩
partial def getTailInfo? : Syntax → Option SourceInfo
| atom info _ => info
| ident info .. => info
| node SourceInfo.none _ args =>
args.findSomeRev? getTailInfo?
| node info _ args => info
| _ => none
def getTailInfo (stx : Syntax) : SourceInfo :=
stx.getTailInfo?.getD SourceInfo.none
def getTrailingSize (stx : Syntax) : Nat :=
match stx.getTailInfo? with
| some (SourceInfo.original (trailing := trailing) ..) => trailing.bsize
| _ => 0
@[specialize] private partial def updateLast {α} [Inhabited α] (a : Array α) (f : α → Option α) (i : Nat) : Option (Array α) :=
if i == 0 then
none
else
let i := i - 1
let v := a[i]
match f v with
| some v => some <| a.set! i v
| none => updateLast a f i
partial def setTailInfoAux (info : SourceInfo) : Syntax → Option Syntax
| atom _ val => some <| atom info val
| ident _ rawVal val pre => some <| ident info rawVal val pre
| node info k args =>
match updateLast args (setTailInfoAux info) args.size with
| some args => some <| node info k args
| none => none
| stx => none
def setTailInfo (stx : Syntax) (info : SourceInfo) : Syntax :=
match setTailInfoAux info stx with
| some stx => stx
| none => stx
def unsetTrailing (stx : Syntax) : Syntax :=
match stx.getTailInfo with
| SourceInfo.original lead pos trail endPos => stx.setTailInfo (SourceInfo.original lead pos "".toSubstring endPos)
| _ => stx
@[specialize] private partial def updateFirst {α} [Inhabited α] (a : Array α) (f : α → Option α) (i : Nat) : Option (Array α) :=
if h : i < a.size then
let v := a.get ⟨i, h⟩;
match f v with
| some v => some <| a.set ⟨i, h⟩ v
| none => updateFirst a f (i+1)
else
none
partial def setHeadInfoAux (info : SourceInfo) : Syntax → Option Syntax
| atom _ val => some <| atom info val
| ident _ rawVal val pre => some <| ident info rawVal val pre
| node i k args =>
match updateFirst args (setHeadInfoAux info) 0 with
| some args => some <| node i k args
| noxne => none
| stx => none
def setHeadInfo (stx : Syntax) (info : SourceInfo) : Syntax :=
match setHeadInfoAux info stx with
| some stx => stx
| none => stx
def setInfo (info : SourceInfo) : Syntax → Syntax
| atom _ val => atom info val
| ident _ rawVal val pre => ident info rawVal val pre
| node _ kind args => node info kind args
| missing => missing
/-- Return the first atom/identifier that has position information -/
partial def getHead? : Syntax → Option Syntax
| stx@(atom info ..) => info.getPos?.map fun _ => stx
| stx@(ident info ..) => info.getPos?.map fun _ => stx
| node SourceInfo.none _ args => args.findSome? getHead?
| stx@(node info _ _) => stx
| _ => none
def copyHeadTailInfoFrom (target source : Syntax) : Syntax :=
target.setHeadInfo source.getHeadInfo |>.setTailInfo source.getTailInfo
end Syntax
/-- Use the head atom/identifier of the current `ref` as the `ref` -/
@[inline] def withHeadRefOnly {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] [MonadRef m] {α} (x : m α) : m α := do
match (← getRef).getHead? with
| none => x
| some ref => withRef ref x
@[inline] def mkNode (k : SyntaxNodeKind) (args : Array Syntax) : Syntax :=
Syntax.node SourceInfo.none k args
/- Syntax objects for a Lean module. -/
structure Module where
header : Syntax
commands : Array Syntax
/-- Expand all macros in the given syntax -/
partial def expandMacros : Syntax → MacroM Syntax
| stx@(Syntax.node info k args) => do
match (← expandMacro? stx) with
| some stxNew => expandMacros stxNew
| none => do
let args ← Macro.withIncRecDepth stx <| args.mapM expandMacros
pure <| Syntax.node info k args
| stx => pure stx
/- Helper functions for processing Syntax programmatically -/
/--
Create an identifier copying the position from `src`.
To refer to a specific constant, use `mkCIdentFrom` instead. -/
def mkIdentFrom (src : Syntax) (val : Name) : Syntax :=
Syntax.ident (SourceInfo.fromRef src) (toString val).toSubstring val []
def mkIdentFromRef [Monad m] [MonadRef m] (val : Name) : m Syntax := do
return mkIdentFrom (← getRef) val
/--
Create an identifier referring to a constant `c` copying the position from `src`.
This variant of `mkIdentFrom` makes sure that the identifier cannot accidentally
be captured. -/
def mkCIdentFrom (src : Syntax) (c : Name) : Syntax :=
-- Remark: We use the reserved macro scope to make sure there are no accidental collision with our frontend
let id := addMacroScope `_internal c reservedMacroScope
Syntax.ident (SourceInfo.fromRef src) (toString id).toSubstring id [(c, [])]
def mkCIdentFromRef [Monad m] [MonadRef m] (c : Name) : m Syntax := do
return mkCIdentFrom (← getRef) c
def mkCIdent (c : Name) : Syntax :=
mkCIdentFrom Syntax.missing c
@[export lean_mk_syntax_ident]
def mkIdent (val : Name) : Syntax :=
Syntax.ident SourceInfo.none (toString val).toSubstring val []
@[inline] def mkNullNode (args : Array Syntax := #[]) : Syntax :=
mkNode nullKind args
@[inline] def mkGroupNode (args : Array Syntax := #[]) : Syntax :=
mkNode groupKind args
def mkSepArray (as : Array Syntax) (sep : Syntax) : Array Syntax := do
let mut i := 0
let mut r := #[]
for a in as do
if i > 0 then
r := r.push sep |>.push a
else
r := r.push a
i := i + 1
return r
def mkOptionalNode (arg : Option Syntax) : Syntax :=
match arg with
| some arg => mkNullNode #[arg]
| none => mkNullNode #[]
def mkHole (ref : Syntax) : Syntax :=
mkNode `Lean.Parser.Term.hole #[mkAtomFrom ref "_"]
namespace Syntax
def mkSep (a : Array Syntax) (sep : Syntax) : Syntax :=
mkNullNode <| mkSepArray a sep
def SepArray.ofElems {sep} (elems : Array Syntax) : SepArray sep :=
⟨mkSepArray elems (mkAtom sep)⟩
def SepArray.ofElemsUsingRef [Monad m] [MonadRef m] {sep} (elems : Array Syntax) : m (SepArray sep) := do
let ref ← getRef;
return ⟨mkSepArray elems (mkAtomFrom ref sep)⟩
instance (sep) : Coe (Array Syntax) (SepArray sep) where
coe := SepArray.ofElems
/-- Create syntax representing a Lean term application, but avoid degenerate empty applications. -/
def mkApp (fn : Syntax) : (args : Array Syntax) → Syntax
| #[] => fn
| args => mkNode `Lean.Parser.Term.app #[fn, mkNullNode args]
def mkCApp (fn : Name) (args : Array Syntax) : Syntax :=
mkApp (mkCIdent fn) args
def mkLit (kind : SyntaxNodeKind) (val : String) (info := SourceInfo.none) : Syntax :=
let atom : Syntax := Syntax.atom info val
mkNode kind #[atom]
def mkStrLit (val : String) (info := SourceInfo.none) : Syntax :=
mkLit strLitKind (String.quote val) info
def mkNumLit (val : String) (info := SourceInfo.none) : Syntax :=
mkLit numLitKind val info
def mkScientificLit (val : String) (info := SourceInfo.none) : Syntax :=
mkLit scientificLitKind val info
def mkNameLit (val : String) (info := SourceInfo.none) : Syntax :=
mkLit nameLitKind val info
/- Recall that we don't have special Syntax constructors for storing numeric and string atoms.
The idea is to have an extensible approach where embedded DSLs may have new kind of atoms and/or
different ways of representing them. So, our atoms contain just the parsed string.
The main Lean parser uses the kind `numLitKind` for storing natural numbers that can be encoded
in binary, octal, decimal and hexadecimal format. `isNatLit` implements a "decoder"
for Syntax objects representing these numerals. -/
private partial def decodeBinLitAux (s : String) (i : String.Pos) (val : Nat) : Option Nat :=
if s.atEnd i then some val
else
let c := s.get i
if c == '0' then decodeBinLitAux s (s.next i) (2*val)
else if c == '1' then decodeBinLitAux s (s.next i) (2*val + 1)
else none
private partial def decodeOctalLitAux (s : String) (i : String.Pos) (val : Nat) : Option Nat :=
if s.atEnd i then some val
else
let c := s.get i
if '0' ≤ c && c ≤ '7' then decodeOctalLitAux s (s.next i) (8*val + c.toNat - '0'.toNat)
else none
private def decodeHexDigit (s : String) (i : String.Pos) : Option (Nat × String.Pos) :=
let c := s.get i
let i := s.next i
if '0' ≤ c && c ≤ '9' then some (c.toNat - '0'.toNat, i)
else if 'a' ≤ c && c ≤ 'f' then some (10 + c.toNat - 'a'.toNat, i)
else if 'A' ≤ c && c ≤ 'F' then some (10 + c.toNat - 'A'.toNat, i)
else none
private partial def decodeHexLitAux (s : String) (i : String.Pos) (val : Nat) : Option Nat :=
if s.atEnd i then some val
else match decodeHexDigit s i with
| some (d, i) => decodeHexLitAux s i (16*val + d)
| none => none
private partial def decodeDecimalLitAux (s : String) (i : String.Pos) (val : Nat) : Option Nat :=
if s.atEnd i then some val
else
let c := s.get i
if '0' ≤ c && c ≤ '9' then decodeDecimalLitAux s (s.next i) (10*val + c.toNat - '0'.toNat)
else none
def decodeNatLitVal? (s : String) : Option Nat :=
let len := s.length
if len == 0 then none
else
let c := s.get 0
if c == '0' then
if len == 1 then some 0
else
let c := s.get 1
if c == 'x' || c == 'X' then decodeHexLitAux s 2 0
else if c == 'b' || c == 'B' then decodeBinLitAux s 2 0
else if c == 'o' || c == 'O' then decodeOctalLitAux s 2 0
else if c.isDigit then decodeDecimalLitAux s 0 0
else none
else if c.isDigit then decodeDecimalLitAux s 0 0
else none
def isLit? (litKind : SyntaxNodeKind) (stx : Syntax) : Option String :=
match stx with
| Syntax.node _ k args =>
if k == litKind && args.size == 1 then
match args.get! 0 with
| (Syntax.atom _ val) => some val
| _ => none
else
none
| _ => none
private def isNatLitAux (litKind : SyntaxNodeKind) (stx : Syntax) : Option Nat :=
match isLit? litKind stx with
| some val => decodeNatLitVal? val
| _ => none
def isNatLit? (s : Syntax) : Option Nat :=
isNatLitAux numLitKind s
def isFieldIdx? (s : Syntax) : Option Nat :=
isNatLitAux fieldIdxKind s
partial def decodeScientificLitVal? (s : String) : Option (Nat × Bool × Nat) :=
let len := s.length
if len == 0 then none
else
let c := s.get 0
if c.isDigit then
decode 0 0
else none
where
decodeAfterExp (i : String.Pos) (val : Nat) (e : Nat) (sign : Bool) (exp : Nat) : Option (Nat × Bool × Nat) :=
if s.atEnd i then
if sign then
some (val, sign, exp + e)
else if exp >= e then
some (val, sign, exp - e)
else
some (val, true, e - exp)
else
let c := s.get i
if '0' ≤ c && c ≤ '9' then
decodeAfterExp (s.next i) val e sign (10*exp + c.toNat - '0'.toNat)
else
none
decodeExp (i : String.Pos) (val : Nat) (e : Nat) : Option (Nat × Bool × Nat) :=
let c := s.get i
if c == '-' then
decodeAfterExp (s.next i) val e true 0
else
decodeAfterExp i val e false 0
decodeAfterDot (i : String.Pos) (val : Nat) (e : Nat) : Option (Nat × Bool × Nat) :=
if s.atEnd i then
some (val, true, e)
else
let c := s.get i
if '0' ≤ c && c ≤ '9' then
decodeAfterDot (s.next i) (10*val + c.toNat - '0'.toNat) (e+1)
else if c == 'e' || c == 'E' then
decodeExp (s.next i) val e
else
none
decode (i : String.Pos) (val : Nat) : Option (Nat × Bool × Nat) :=
if s.atEnd i then
none
else
let c := s.get i
if '0' ≤ c && c ≤ '9' then
decode (s.next i) (10*val + c.toNat - '0'.toNat)
else if c == '.' then
decodeAfterDot (s.next i) val 0
else if c == 'e' || c == 'E' then
decodeExp (s.next i) val 0
else
none
def isScientificLit? (stx : Syntax) : Option (Nat × Bool × Nat) :=
match isLit? scientificLitKind stx with
| some val => decodeScientificLitVal? val
| _ => none
def isIdOrAtom? : Syntax → Option String
| Syntax.atom _ val => some val
| Syntax.ident _ rawVal _ _ => some rawVal.toString
| _ => none
def toNat (stx : Syntax) : Nat :=
match stx.isNatLit? with
| some val => val
| none => 0
def decodeQuotedChar (s : String) (i : String.Pos) : Option (Char × String.Pos) :=
OptionM.run do
let c := s.get i
let i := s.next i
if c == '\\' then pure ('\\', i)
else if c = '\"' then pure ('\"', i)
else if c = '\'' then pure ('\'', i)
else if c = 'r' then pure ('\r', i)
else if c = 'n' then pure ('\n', i)
else if c = 't' then pure ('\t', i)
else if c = 'x' then
let (d₁, i) ← decodeHexDigit s i
let (d₂, i) ← decodeHexDigit s i
pure (Char.ofNat (16*d₁ + d₂), i)
else if c = 'u' then do
let (d₁, i) ← decodeHexDigit s i
let (d₂, i) ← decodeHexDigit s i
let (d₃, i) ← decodeHexDigit s i
let (d₄, i) ← decodeHexDigit s i
pure (Char.ofNat (16*(16*(16*d₁ + d₂) + d₃) + d₄), i)
else
none
partial def decodeStrLitAux (s : String) (i : String.Pos) (acc : String) : Option String :=
OptionM.run do
let c := s.get i
let i := s.next i
if c == '\"' then
pure acc
else if s.atEnd i then
none
else if c == '\\' then do
let (c, i) ← decodeQuotedChar s i
decodeStrLitAux s i (acc.push c)
else
decodeStrLitAux s i (acc.push c)
def decodeStrLit (s : String) : Option String :=
decodeStrLitAux s 1 ""
def isStrLit? (stx : Syntax) : Option String :=
match isLit? strLitKind stx with
| some val => decodeStrLit val
| _ => none
def decodeCharLit (s : String) : Option Char :=
OptionM.run do
let c := s.get 1
if c == '\\' then do
let (c, _) ← decodeQuotedChar s 2
pure c
else
pure c
def isCharLit? (stx : Syntax) : Option Char :=
match isLit? charLitKind stx with
| some val => decodeCharLit val
| _ => none
private partial def splitNameLitAux (ss : Substring) (acc : List Substring) : List Substring :=
let splitRest (ss : Substring) (acc : List Substring) : List Substring :=
if ss.front == '.' then
splitNameLitAux (ss.drop 1) acc
else if ss.isEmpty then
acc
else
[]
if ss.isEmpty then []
else
let curr := ss.front
if isIdBeginEscape curr then
let escapedPart := ss.takeWhile (!isIdEndEscape ·)
let escapedPart := { escapedPart with stopPos := ss.stopPos.min (escapedPart.str.next escapedPart.stopPos) }
if !isIdEndEscape (escapedPart.get <| escapedPart.prev escapedPart.bsize) then []
else splitRest (ss.extract escapedPart.bsize ss.bsize) (escapedPart :: acc)
else if isIdFirst curr then
let idPart := ss.takeWhile isIdRest
splitRest (ss.extract idPart.bsize ss.bsize) (idPart :: acc)
else if curr.isDigit then
let idPart := ss.takeWhile Char.isDigit
splitRest (ss.extract idPart.bsize ss.bsize) (idPart :: acc)
else
[]
/-- Split a name literal (without the backtick) into its dot-separated components. For example,
`foo.bla.«bo.o»` ↦ `["foo", "bla", "«bo.o»"]`. If the literal cannot be parsed, return `[]`. -/
def splitNameLit (ss : Substring) : List Substring :=
splitNameLitAux ss [] |>.reverse
def decodeNameLit (s : String) : Option Name :=
if s.get 0 == '`' then
match splitNameLitAux (s.toSubstring.drop 1) [] with
| [] => none
| comps => some <| comps.foldr (init := Name.anonymous)
fun comp n =>
let comp := comp.toString
if isIdBeginEscape comp.front then
Name.mkStr n (comp.drop 1 |>.dropRight 1)
else if comp.front.isDigit then
if let some k := decodeNatLitVal? comp then
Name.mkNum n k
else
unreachable!
else
Name.mkStr n comp
else
none
def isNameLit? (stx : Syntax) : Option Name :=
match isLit? nameLitKind stx with
| some val => decodeNameLit val
| _ => none
def hasArgs : Syntax → Bool
| Syntax.node _ _ args => args.size > 0
| _ => false
def isAtom : Syntax → Bool
| atom _ _ => true
| _ => false
def isToken (token : String) : Syntax → Bool
| atom _ val => val.trim == token.trim
| _ => false
def isNone (stx : Syntax) : Bool :=
match stx with
| Syntax.node _ k args => k == nullKind && args.size == 0
-- when elaborating partial syntax trees, it's reasonable to interpret missing parts as `none`
| Syntax.missing => true
| _ => false
def getOptional? (stx : Syntax) : Option Syntax :=
match stx with
| Syntax.node _ k args => if k == nullKind && args.size == 1 then some (args.get! 0) else none
| _ => none
def getOptionalIdent? (stx : Syntax) : Option Name :=
match stx.getOptional? with
| some stx => some stx.getId
| none => none
partial def findAux (p : Syntax → Bool) : Syntax → Option Syntax
| stx@(Syntax.node _ _ args) => if p stx then some stx else args.findSome? (findAux p)
| stx => if p stx then some stx else none
def find? (stx : Syntax) (p : Syntax → Bool) : Option Syntax :=
findAux p stx
end Syntax
/-- Reflect a runtime datum back to surface syntax (best-effort). -/
class Quote (α : Type) where
quote : α → Syntax
export Quote (quote)
instance : Quote Syntax := ⟨id⟩
instance : Quote Bool := ⟨fun | true => mkCIdent `Bool.true | false => mkCIdent `Bool.false⟩
instance : Quote String := ⟨Syntax.mkStrLit⟩
instance : Quote Nat := ⟨fun n => Syntax.mkNumLit <| toString n⟩
instance : Quote Substring := ⟨fun s => Syntax.mkCApp `String.toSubstring #[quote s.toString]⟩
-- in contrast to `Name.toString`, we can, and want to be, precise here
private def getEscapedNameParts? (acc : List String) : Name → OptionM (List String)
| Name.anonymous => acc
| Name.str n s _ => do
let s ← Name.escapePart s
getEscapedNameParts? (s::acc) n
| Name.num n i _ => none
private def quoteNameMk : Name → Syntax
| Name.anonymous => mkCIdent ``Name.anonymous
| Name.str n s _ => Syntax.mkCApp ``Name.mkStr #[quoteNameMk n, quote s]
| Name.num n i _ => Syntax.mkCApp ``Name.mkNum #[quoteNameMk n, quote i]
instance : Quote Name where
quote n := match getEscapedNameParts? [] n with
| some ss => mkNode `Lean.Parser.Term.quotedName #[Syntax.mkNameLit ("`" ++ ".".intercalate ss)]
| none => quoteNameMk n
instance {α β : Type} [Quote α] [Quote β] : Quote (α × β) where
quote
| ⟨a, b⟩ => Syntax.mkCApp ``Prod.mk #[quote a, quote b]
private def quoteList {α : Type} [Quote α] : List α → Syntax
| [] => mkCIdent ``List.nil
| (x::xs) => Syntax.mkCApp ``List.cons #[quote x, quoteList xs]
instance {α : Type} [Quote α] : Quote (List α) where
quote := quoteList
instance {α : Type} [Quote α] : Quote (Array α) where
quote xs := Syntax.mkCApp ``List.toArray #[quote xs.toList]
private def quoteOption {α : Type} [Quote α] : Option α → Syntax
| none => mkIdent ``none
| (some x) => Syntax.mkCApp ``some #[quote x]
instance Option.hasQuote {α : Type} [Quote α] : Quote (Option α) where
quote := quoteOption
/- Evaluator for `prec` DSL -/
def evalPrec (stx : Syntax) : MacroM Nat :=
Macro.withIncRecDepth stx do
let stx ← expandMacros stx
match stx with
| `(prec| $num:numLit) => return num.isNatLit?.getD 0
| _ => Macro.throwErrorAt stx "unexpected precedence"
macro_rules
| `(prec| $a + $b) => do `(prec| $(quote <| (← evalPrec a) + (← evalPrec b)):numLit)
macro_rules
| `(prec| $a - $b) => do `(prec| $(quote <| (← evalPrec a) - (← evalPrec b)):numLit)
macro "eval_prec " p:prec:max : term => return quote (← evalPrec p)
/- Evaluator for `prio` DSL -/
def evalPrio (stx : Syntax) : MacroM Nat :=
Macro.withIncRecDepth stx do
let stx ← expandMacros stx
match stx with
| `(prio| $num:numLit) => return num.isNatLit?.getD 0
| _ => Macro.throwErrorAt stx "unexpected priority"
macro_rules
| `(prio| $a + $b) => do `(prio| $(quote <| (← evalPrio a) + (← evalPrio b)):numLit)
macro_rules
| `(prio| $a - $b) => do `(prio| $(quote <| (← evalPrio a) - (← evalPrio b)):numLit)
macro "eval_prio " p:prio:max : term => return quote (← evalPrio p)
def evalOptPrio : Option Syntax → MacroM Nat
| some prio => evalPrio prio
| none => return eval_prio default
end Lean
namespace Array
abbrev getSepElems := @getEvenElems
open Lean
private partial def filterSepElemsMAux {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] (a : Array Syntax) (p : Syntax → m Bool) (i : Nat) (acc : Array Syntax) : m (Array Syntax) := do
if h : i < a.size then
let stx := a.get ⟨i, h⟩
if (← p stx) then
if acc.isEmpty then
filterSepElemsMAux a p (i+2) (acc.push stx)
else if hz : i ≠ 0 then
have : i.pred < i := Nat.pred_lt hz
let sepStx := a.get ⟨i.pred, Nat.lt_trans this h⟩
filterSepElemsMAux a p (i+2) ((acc.push sepStx).push stx)
else
filterSepElemsMAux a p (i+2) (acc.push stx)
else
filterSepElemsMAux a p (i+2) acc
else
pure acc
def filterSepElemsM {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] (a : Array Syntax) (p : Syntax → m Bool) : m (Array Syntax) :=
filterSepElemsMAux a p 0 #[]
def filterSepElems (a : Array Syntax) (p : Syntax → Bool) : Array Syntax :=
Id.run <| a.filterSepElemsM p
private partial def mapSepElemsMAux {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] (a : Array Syntax) (f : Syntax → m Syntax) (i : Nat) (acc : Array Syntax) : m (Array Syntax) := do
if h : i < a.size then
let stx := a.get ⟨i, h⟩
if i % 2 == 0 then do
let stx ← f stx
mapSepElemsMAux a f (i+1) (acc.push stx)
else
mapSepElemsMAux a f (i+1) (acc.push stx)
else
pure acc
def mapSepElemsM {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] (a : Array Syntax) (f : Syntax → m Syntax) : m (Array Syntax) :=
mapSepElemsMAux a f 0 #[]
def mapSepElems (a : Array Syntax) (f : Syntax → Syntax) : Array Syntax :=
Id.run <| a.mapSepElemsM f
end Array
namespace Lean.Syntax.SepArray
def getElems {sep} (sa : SepArray sep) : Array Syntax :=
sa.elemsAndSeps.getSepElems
/-
We use `CoeTail` here instead of `Coe` to avoid a "loop" when computing `CoeTC`.
The "loop" is interrupted using the maximum instance size threshold, but it is a performance bottleneck.
The loop occurs because the predicate `isNewAnswer` is too imprecise.
-/
instance (sep) : CoeTail (SepArray sep) (Array Syntax) where
coe := getElems
end Lean.Syntax.SepArray
/--
Gadget for automatic parameter support. This is similar to the `optParam` gadget, but it uses
the given tactic.
Like `optParam`, this gadget only affects elaboration.
For example, the tactic will *not* be invoked during type class resolution. -/
abbrev autoParam.{u} (α : Sort u) (tactic : Lean.Syntax) : Sort u := α
/- Helper functions for manipulating interpolated strings -/
namespace Lean.Syntax
private def decodeInterpStrQuotedChar (s : String) (i : String.Pos) : Option (Char × String.Pos) :=
OptionM.run do
match decodeQuotedChar s i with
| some r => some r
| none =>
let c := s.get i
let i := s.next i
if c == '{' then pure ('{', i)
else none
private partial def decodeInterpStrLit (s : String) : Option String :=
let rec loop (i : String.Pos) (acc : String) : OptionM String :=
let c := s.get i
let i := s.next i
if c == '\"' || c == '{' then
pure acc
else if s.atEnd i then
none
else if c == '\\' then do
let (c, i) ← decodeInterpStrQuotedChar s i
loop i (acc.push c)
else
loop i (acc.push c)
loop 1 ""
partial def isInterpolatedStrLit? (stx : Syntax) : Option String :=
match isLit? interpolatedStrLitKind stx with
| none => none
| some val => decodeInterpStrLit val
def expandInterpolatedStrChunks (chunks : Array Syntax) (mkAppend : Syntax → Syntax → MacroM Syntax) (mkElem : Syntax → MacroM Syntax) : MacroM Syntax := do
let mut i := 0
let mut result := Syntax.missing
for elem in chunks do
let elem ← match elem.isInterpolatedStrLit? with
| none => mkElem elem
| some str => mkElem (Syntax.mkStrLit str)
if i == 0 then
result := elem
else
result ← mkAppend result elem
i := i+1
return result
def expandInterpolatedStr (interpStr : Syntax) (type : Syntax) (toTypeFn : Syntax) : MacroM Syntax := do
let ref := interpStr
let r ← expandInterpolatedStrChunks interpStr.getArgs (fun a b => `($a ++ $b)) (fun a => `($toTypeFn $a))
`(($r : $type))
def getSepArgs (stx : Syntax) : Array Syntax :=
stx.getArgs.getSepElems
end Syntax
namespace Meta
inductive TransparencyMode where
| all | default | reducible | instances
deriving Inhabited, BEq, Repr
namespace Simp
def defaultMaxSteps := 100000
structure Config where
maxSteps : Nat := defaultMaxSteps
maxDischargeDepth : Nat := 2
contextual : Bool := false
memoize : Bool := true
singlePass : Bool := false
zeta : Bool := true
beta : Bool := true
eta : Bool := true
iota : Bool := true
proj : Bool := true
decide : Bool := true
deriving Inhabited, BEq, Repr
-- Configuration object for `simp_all`
structure ConfigCtx extends Config where
contextual := true
end Simp
namespace Rewrite
structure Config where
transparency : TransparencyMode := TransparencyMode.reducible
offsetCnstrs : Bool := true
end Rewrite
end Meta
namespace Parser.Tactic
macro "erw " s:rwRuleSeq loc:(location)? : tactic =>
`(rw (config := { transparency := Lean.Meta.TransparencyMode.default }) $s:rwRuleSeq $[$(loc.getOptional?):location]?)
end Parser.Tactic
end Lean
|
467ee8d0e156888c4002bafc002db539b57d9c91 | 02005f45e00c7ecf2c8ca5db60251bd1e9c860b5 | /src/order/complete_lattice.lean | 2dcc1a58df0afb0d60cef2742eca32970a0ce92d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | anthony2698/mathlib | 03cd69fe5c280b0916f6df2d07c614c8e1efe890 | 407615e05814e98b24b2ff322b14e8e3eb5e5d67 | refs/heads/master | 1,678,792,774,873 | 1,614,371,563,000 | 1,614,371,563,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 43,625 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import order.bounds
/-!
# Theory of complete lattices
## Main definitions
* `Sup` and `Inf` are the supremum and the infimum of a set;
* `supr (f : ι → α)` and `infi (f : ι → α)` are indexed supremum and infimum of a function,
defined as `Sup` and `Inf` of the range of this function;
* `class complete_lattice`: a bounded lattice such that `Sup s` is always the least upper boundary
of `s` and `Inf s` is always the greatest lower boundary of `s`;
* `class complete_linear_order`: a linear ordered complete lattice.
## Naming conventions
We use `Sup`/`Inf`/`supr`/`infi` for the corresponding functions in the statement. Sometimes we
also use `bsupr`/`binfi` for "bounded` supremum or infimum, i.e. one of `⨆ i ∈ s, f i`,
`⨆ i (hi : p i), f i`, or more generally `⨆ i (hi : p i), f i hi`.
## Notation
* `⨆ i, f i` : `supr f`, the supremum of the range of `f`;
* `⨅ i, f i` : `infi f`, the infimum of the range of `f`.
-/
set_option old_structure_cmd true
open set
variables {α β β₂ : Type*} {ι ι₂ : Sort*}
/-- class for the `Sup` operator -/
class has_Sup (α : Type*) := (Sup : set α → α)
/-- class for the `Inf` operator -/
class has_Inf (α : Type*) := (Inf : set α → α)
export has_Sup (Sup) has_Inf (Inf)
/-- Supremum of a set -/
add_decl_doc has_Sup.Sup
/-- Infimum of a set -/
add_decl_doc has_Inf.Inf
/-- Indexed supremum -/
def supr [has_Sup α] {ι} (s : ι → α) : α := Sup (range s)
/-- Indexed infimum -/
def infi [has_Inf α] {ι} (s : ι → α) : α := Inf (range s)
@[priority 50] instance has_Inf_to_nonempty (α) [has_Inf α] : nonempty α := ⟨Inf ∅⟩
@[priority 50] instance has_Sup_to_nonempty (α) [has_Sup α] : nonempty α := ⟨Sup ∅⟩
notation `⨆` binders `, ` r:(scoped f, supr f) := r
notation `⨅` binders `, ` r:(scoped f, infi f) := r
instance (α) [has_Inf α] : has_Sup (order_dual α) := ⟨(Inf : set α → α)⟩
instance (α) [has_Sup α] : has_Inf (order_dual α) := ⟨(Sup : set α → α)⟩
/-- A complete lattice is a bounded lattice which
has suprema and infima for every subset. -/
@[protect_proj]
class complete_lattice (α : Type*) extends bounded_lattice α, has_Sup α, has_Inf α :=
(le_Sup : ∀s, ∀a∈s, a ≤ Sup s)
(Sup_le : ∀s a, (∀b∈s, b ≤ a) → Sup s ≤ a)
(Inf_le : ∀s, ∀a∈s, Inf s ≤ a)
(le_Inf : ∀s a, (∀b∈s, a ≤ b) → a ≤ Inf s)
/-- Create a `complete_lattice` from a `partial_order` and `Inf` function
that returns the greatest lower bound of a set. Usually this constructor provides
poor definitional equalities. If other fields are known explicitly, they should be
provided; for example, if `inf` is known explicitly, construct the `complete_lattice`
instance as
```
instance : complete_lattice my_T :=
{ inf := better_inf,
le_inf := ...,
inf_le_right := ...,
inf_le_left := ...
-- don't care to fix sup, Sup, bot, top
..complete_lattice_of_Inf my_T _ }
```
-/
def complete_lattice_of_Inf (α : Type*) [H1 : partial_order α]
[H2 : has_Inf α] (is_glb_Inf : ∀ s : set α, is_glb s (Inf s)) :
complete_lattice α :=
{ bot := Inf univ,
bot_le := λ x, (is_glb_Inf univ).1 trivial,
top := Inf ∅,
le_top := λ a, (is_glb_Inf ∅).2 $ by simp,
sup := λ a b, Inf {x | a ≤ x ∧ b ≤ x},
inf := λ a b, Inf {a, b},
le_inf := λ a b c hab hac, by { apply (is_glb_Inf _).2, simp [*] },
inf_le_right := λ a b, (is_glb_Inf _).1 $ mem_insert_of_mem _ $ mem_singleton _,
inf_le_left := λ a b, (is_glb_Inf _).1 $ mem_insert _ _,
sup_le := λ a b c hac hbc, (is_glb_Inf _).1 $ by simp [*],
le_sup_left := λ a b, (is_glb_Inf _).2 $ λ x, and.left,
le_sup_right := λ a b, (is_glb_Inf _).2 $ λ x, and.right,
le_Inf := λ s a ha, (is_glb_Inf s).2 ha,
Inf_le := λ s a ha, (is_glb_Inf s).1 ha,
Sup := λ s, Inf (upper_bounds s),
le_Sup := λ s a ha, (is_glb_Inf (upper_bounds s)).2 $ λ b hb, hb ha,
Sup_le := λ s a ha, (is_glb_Inf (upper_bounds s)).1 ha,
.. H1, .. H2 }
/-- Create a `complete_lattice` from a `partial_order` and `Sup` function
that returns the least upper bound of a set. Usually this constructor provides
poor definitional equalities. If other fields are known explicitly, they should be
provided; for example, if `inf` is known explicitly, construct the `complete_lattice`
instance as
```
instance : complete_lattice my_T :=
{ inf := better_inf,
le_inf := ...,
inf_le_right := ...,
inf_le_left := ...
-- don't care to fix sup, Inf, bot, top
..complete_lattice_of_Sup my_T _ }
```
-/
def complete_lattice_of_Sup (α : Type*) [H1 : partial_order α]
[H2 : has_Sup α] (is_lub_Sup : ∀ s : set α, is_lub s (Sup s)) :
complete_lattice α :=
{ top := Sup univ,
le_top := λ x, (is_lub_Sup univ).1 trivial,
bot := Sup ∅,
bot_le := λ x, (is_lub_Sup ∅).2 $ by simp,
sup := λ a b, Sup {a, b},
sup_le := λ a b c hac hbc, (is_lub_Sup _).2 (by simp [*]),
le_sup_left := λ a b, (is_lub_Sup _).1 $ mem_insert _ _,
le_sup_right := λ a b, (is_lub_Sup _).1 $ mem_insert_of_mem _ $ mem_singleton _,
inf := λ a b, Sup {x | x ≤ a ∧ x ≤ b},
le_inf := λ a b c hab hac, (is_lub_Sup _).1 $ by simp [*],
inf_le_left := λ a b, (is_lub_Sup _).2 (λ x, and.left),
inf_le_right := λ a b, (is_lub_Sup _).2 (λ x, and.right),
Inf := λ s, Sup (lower_bounds s),
Sup_le := λ s a ha, (is_lub_Sup s).2 ha,
le_Sup := λ s a ha, (is_lub_Sup s).1 ha,
Inf_le := λ s a ha, (is_lub_Sup (lower_bounds s)).2 (λ b hb, hb ha),
le_Inf := λ s a ha, (is_lub_Sup (lower_bounds s)).1 ha,
.. H1, .. H2 }
/-- A complete linear order is a linear order whose lattice structure is complete. -/
class complete_linear_order (α : Type*) extends complete_lattice α, linear_order α
namespace order_dual
variable (α)
instance [complete_lattice α] : complete_lattice (order_dual α) :=
{ le_Sup := @complete_lattice.Inf_le α _,
Sup_le := @complete_lattice.le_Inf α _,
Inf_le := @complete_lattice.le_Sup α _,
le_Inf := @complete_lattice.Sup_le α _,
.. order_dual.bounded_lattice α, ..order_dual.has_Sup α, ..order_dual.has_Inf α }
instance [complete_linear_order α] : complete_linear_order (order_dual α) :=
{ .. order_dual.complete_lattice α, .. order_dual.linear_order α }
end order_dual
section
variables [complete_lattice α] {s t : set α} {a b : α}
@[ematch] theorem le_Sup : a ∈ s → a ≤ Sup s := complete_lattice.le_Sup s a
theorem Sup_le : (∀b∈s, b ≤ a) → Sup s ≤ a := complete_lattice.Sup_le s a
@[ematch] theorem Inf_le : a ∈ s → Inf s ≤ a := complete_lattice.Inf_le s a
theorem le_Inf : (∀b∈s, a ≤ b) → a ≤ Inf s := complete_lattice.le_Inf s a
lemma is_lub_Sup (s : set α) : is_lub s (Sup s) := ⟨assume x, le_Sup, assume x, Sup_le⟩
lemma is_lub.Sup_eq (h : is_lub s a) : Sup s = a := (is_lub_Sup s).unique h
lemma is_glb_Inf (s : set α) : is_glb s (Inf s) := ⟨assume a, Inf_le, assume a, le_Inf⟩
lemma is_glb.Inf_eq (h : is_glb s a) : Inf s = a := (is_glb_Inf s).unique h
theorem le_Sup_of_le (hb : b ∈ s) (h : a ≤ b) : a ≤ Sup s :=
le_trans h (le_Sup hb)
theorem Inf_le_of_le (hb : b ∈ s) (h : b ≤ a) : Inf s ≤ a :=
le_trans (Inf_le hb) h
theorem Sup_le_Sup (h : s ⊆ t) : Sup s ≤ Sup t :=
(is_lub_Sup s).mono (is_lub_Sup t) h
theorem Inf_le_Inf (h : s ⊆ t) : Inf t ≤ Inf s :=
(is_glb_Inf s).mono (is_glb_Inf t) h
@[simp] theorem Sup_le_iff : Sup s ≤ a ↔ (∀b ∈ s, b ≤ a) :=
is_lub_le_iff (is_lub_Sup s)
@[simp] theorem le_Inf_iff : a ≤ Inf s ↔ (∀b ∈ s, a ≤ b) :=
le_is_glb_iff (is_glb_Inf s)
theorem Sup_le_Sup_of_forall_exists_le (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, x ≤ y) : Sup s ≤ Sup t :=
le_of_forall_le' (by simp only [Sup_le_iff]; introv h₀ h₁; rcases h _ h₁ with ⟨y,hy,hy'⟩; solve_by_elim [le_trans hy'])
theorem Inf_le_Inf_of_forall_exists_le (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, y ≤ x) : Inf t ≤ Inf s :=
le_of_forall_le (by simp only [le_Inf_iff]; introv h₀ h₁; rcases h _ h₁ with ⟨y,hy,hy'⟩; solve_by_elim [le_trans _ hy'])
theorem Inf_le_Sup (hs : s.nonempty) : Inf s ≤ Sup s :=
is_glb_le_is_lub (is_glb_Inf s) (is_lub_Sup s) hs
-- TODO: it is weird that we have to add union_def
theorem Sup_union {s t : set α} : Sup (s ∪ t) = Sup s ⊔ Sup t :=
((is_lub_Sup s).union (is_lub_Sup t)).Sup_eq
theorem Sup_inter_le {s t : set α} : Sup (s ∩ t) ≤ Sup s ⊓ Sup t :=
by finish
/-
Sup_le (assume a ⟨a_s, a_t⟩, le_inf (le_Sup a_s) (le_Sup a_t))
-/
theorem Inf_union {s t : set α} : Inf (s ∪ t) = Inf s ⊓ Inf t :=
((is_glb_Inf s).union (is_glb_Inf t)).Inf_eq
theorem le_Inf_inter {s t : set α} : Inf s ⊔ Inf t ≤ Inf (s ∩ t) :=
@Sup_inter_le (order_dual α) _ _ _
@[simp] theorem Sup_empty : Sup ∅ = (⊥ : α) :=
is_lub_empty.Sup_eq
@[simp] theorem Inf_empty : Inf ∅ = (⊤ : α) :=
(@is_glb_empty α _).Inf_eq
@[simp] theorem Sup_univ : Sup univ = (⊤ : α) :=
(@is_lub_univ α _).Sup_eq
@[simp] theorem Inf_univ : Inf univ = (⊥ : α) :=
is_glb_univ.Inf_eq
-- TODO(Jeremy): get this automatically
@[simp] theorem Sup_insert {a : α} {s : set α} : Sup (insert a s) = a ⊔ Sup s :=
((is_lub_Sup s).insert a).Sup_eq
@[simp] theorem Inf_insert {a : α} {s : set α} : Inf (insert a s) = a ⊓ Inf s :=
((is_glb_Inf s).insert a).Inf_eq
theorem Sup_le_Sup_of_subset_instert_bot (h : s ⊆ insert ⊥ t) : Sup s ≤ Sup t :=
le_trans (Sup_le_Sup h) (le_of_eq (trans Sup_insert bot_sup_eq))
theorem Inf_le_Inf_of_subset_insert_top (h : s ⊆ insert ⊤ t) : Inf t ≤ Inf s :=
le_trans (le_of_eq (trans top_inf_eq.symm Inf_insert.symm)) (Inf_le_Inf h)
-- We will generalize this to conditionally complete lattices in `cSup_singleton`.
theorem Sup_singleton {a : α} : Sup {a} = a :=
is_lub_singleton.Sup_eq
-- We will generalize this to conditionally complete lattices in `cInf_singleton`.
theorem Inf_singleton {a : α} : Inf {a} = a :=
is_glb_singleton.Inf_eq
theorem Sup_pair {a b : α} : Sup {a, b} = a ⊔ b :=
(@is_lub_pair α _ a b).Sup_eq
theorem Inf_pair {a b : α} : Inf {a, b} = a ⊓ b :=
(@is_glb_pair α _ a b).Inf_eq
@[simp] theorem Inf_eq_top : Inf s = ⊤ ↔ (∀a∈s, a = ⊤) :=
iff.intro
(assume h a ha, top_unique $ h ▸ Inf_le ha)
(assume h, top_unique $ le_Inf $ assume a ha, top_le_iff.2 $ h a ha)
lemma eq_singleton_top_of_Inf_eq_top_of_nonempty {s : set α}
(h_inf : Inf s = ⊤) (hne : s.nonempty) : s = {⊤} :=
by { rw set.eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem, rw Inf_eq_top at h_inf, exact ⟨hne, h_inf⟩, }
@[simp] theorem Sup_eq_bot : Sup s = ⊥ ↔ (∀a∈s, a = ⊥) :=
@Inf_eq_top (order_dual α) _ _
lemma eq_singleton_bot_of_Sup_eq_bot_of_nonempty {s : set α}
(h_sup : Sup s = ⊥) (hne : s.nonempty) : s = {⊥} :=
by { rw set.eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem, rw Sup_eq_bot at h_sup, exact ⟨hne, h_sup⟩, }
end
section complete_linear_order
variables [complete_linear_order α] {s t : set α} {a b : α}
lemma Inf_lt_iff : Inf s < b ↔ (∃a∈s, a < b) :=
is_glb_lt_iff (is_glb_Inf s)
lemma lt_Sup_iff : b < Sup s ↔ (∃a∈s, b < a) :=
lt_is_lub_iff (is_lub_Sup s)
lemma Sup_eq_top : Sup s = ⊤ ↔ (∀b<⊤, ∃a∈s, b < a) :=
iff.intro
(assume (h : Sup s = ⊤) b hb, by rwa [←h, lt_Sup_iff] at hb)
(assume h, top_unique $ le_of_not_gt $ assume h',
let ⟨a, ha, h⟩ := h _ h' in
lt_irrefl a $ lt_of_le_of_lt (le_Sup ha) h)
lemma Inf_eq_bot : Inf s = ⊥ ↔ (∀b>⊥, ∃a∈s, a < b) :=
@Sup_eq_top (order_dual α) _ _
lemma lt_supr_iff {f : ι → α} : a < supr f ↔ (∃i, a < f i) :=
lt_Sup_iff.trans exists_range_iff
lemma infi_lt_iff {f : ι → α} : infi f < a ↔ (∃i, f i < a) :=
Inf_lt_iff.trans exists_range_iff
end complete_linear_order
/-
### supr & infi
-/
section
variables [complete_lattice α] {s t : ι → α} {a b : α}
-- TODO: this declaration gives error when starting smt state
--@[ematch]
theorem le_supr (s : ι → α) (i : ι) : s i ≤ supr s :=
le_Sup ⟨i, rfl⟩
@[ematch] theorem le_supr' (s : ι → α) (i : ι) : (: s i ≤ supr s :) :=
le_Sup ⟨i, rfl⟩
/- TODO: this version would be more powerful, but, alas, the pattern matcher
doesn't accept it.
@[ematch] theorem le_supr' (s : ι → α) (i : ι) : (: s i :) ≤ (: supr s :) :=
le_Sup ⟨i, rfl⟩
-/
lemma is_lub_supr : is_lub (range s) (⨆j, s j) := is_lub_Sup _
lemma is_lub.supr_eq (h : is_lub (range s) a) : (⨆j, s j) = a := h.Sup_eq
lemma is_glb_infi : is_glb (range s) (⨅j, s j) := is_glb_Inf _
lemma is_glb.infi_eq (h : is_glb (range s) a) : (⨅j, s j) = a := h.Inf_eq
theorem le_supr_of_le (i : ι) (h : a ≤ s i) : a ≤ supr s :=
le_trans h (le_supr _ i)
theorem le_bsupr {p : ι → Prop} {f : Π i (h : p i), α} (i : ι) (hi : p i) :
f i hi ≤ ⨆ i hi, f i hi :=
le_supr_of_le i $ le_supr (f i) hi
theorem le_bsupr_of_le {p : ι → Prop} {f : Π i (h : p i), α} (i : ι) (hi : p i) (h : a ≤ f i hi) :
a ≤ ⨆ i hi, f i hi :=
le_trans h (le_bsupr i hi)
theorem supr_le (h : ∀i, s i ≤ a) : supr s ≤ a :=
Sup_le $ assume b ⟨i, eq⟩, eq ▸ h i
theorem bsupr_le {p : ι → Prop} {f : Π i (h : p i), α} (h : ∀ i hi, f i hi ≤ a) :
(⨆ i (hi : p i), f i hi) ≤ a :=
supr_le $ λ i, supr_le $ h i
theorem bsupr_le_supr (p : ι → Prop) (f : ι → α) : (⨆ i (H : p i), f i) ≤ ⨆ i, f i :=
bsupr_le (λ i hi, le_supr f i)
theorem supr_le_supr (h : ∀i, s i ≤ t i) : supr s ≤ supr t :=
supr_le $ assume i, le_supr_of_le i (h i)
theorem supr_le_supr2 {t : ι₂ → α} (h : ∀i, ∃j, s i ≤ t j) : supr s ≤ supr t :=
supr_le $ assume j, exists.elim (h j) le_supr_of_le
theorem bsupr_le_bsupr {p : ι → Prop} {f g : Π i (hi : p i), α} (h : ∀ i hi, f i hi ≤ g i hi) :
(⨆ i hi, f i hi) ≤ ⨆ i hi, g i hi :=
bsupr_le $ λ i hi, le_trans (h i hi) (le_bsupr i hi)
theorem supr_le_supr_const (h : ι → ι₂) : (⨆ i:ι, a) ≤ (⨆ j:ι₂, a) :=
supr_le $ le_supr _ ∘ h
@[simp] theorem supr_le_iff : supr s ≤ a ↔ (∀i, s i ≤ a) :=
(is_lub_le_iff is_lub_supr).trans forall_range_iff
theorem supr_lt_iff : supr s < a ↔ ∃ b < a, ∀ i, s i ≤ b :=
⟨λ h, ⟨supr s, h, λ i, le_supr s i⟩, λ ⟨b, hba, hsb⟩, (supr_le hsb).trans_lt hba⟩
theorem Sup_eq_supr {s : set α} : Sup s = (⨆a ∈ s, a) :=
le_antisymm
(Sup_le $ assume b h, le_supr_of_le b $ le_supr _ h)
(supr_le $ assume b, supr_le $ assume h, le_Sup h)
lemma Sup_sUnion {s : set (set α)} :
Sup (⋃₀ s) = ⨆ (t ∈ s), Sup t :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ apply Sup_le (λ b hb, _),
rcases hb with ⟨t, ts, bt⟩,
apply le_trans _ (le_supr _ t),
exact le_trans (le_Sup bt) (le_supr _ ts), },
{ apply supr_le (λ t, _),
exact supr_le (λ ts, Sup_le_Sup (λ x xt, ⟨t, ts, xt⟩)) }
end
lemma le_supr_iff : (a ≤ supr s) ↔ (∀ b, (∀ i, s i ≤ b) → a ≤ b) :=
⟨λ h b hb, le_trans h (supr_le hb), λ h, h _ $ λ i, le_supr s i⟩
lemma monotone.le_map_supr [complete_lattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : monotone f) :
(⨆ i, f (s i)) ≤ f (supr s) :=
supr_le $ λ i, hf $ le_supr _ _
lemma monotone.le_map_supr2 [complete_lattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : monotone f)
{ι' : ι → Sort*} (s : Π i, ι' i → α) :
(⨆ i (h : ι' i), f (s i h)) ≤ f (⨆ i (h : ι' i), s i h) :=
calc (⨆ i h, f (s i h)) ≤ (⨆ i, f (⨆ h, s i h)) :
supr_le_supr $ λ i, hf.le_map_supr
... ≤ f (⨆ i (h : ι' i), s i h) : hf.le_map_supr
lemma monotone.le_map_Sup [complete_lattice β] {s : set α} {f : α → β} (hf : monotone f) :
(⨆a∈s, f a) ≤ f (Sup s) :=
by rw [Sup_eq_supr]; exact hf.le_map_supr2 _
lemma supr_comp_le {ι' : Sort*} (f : ι' → α) (g : ι → ι') :
(⨆ x, f (g x)) ≤ ⨆ y, f y :=
supr_le_supr2 $ λ x, ⟨_, le_refl _⟩
lemma monotone.supr_comp_eq [preorder β] {f : β → α} (hf : monotone f)
{s : ι → β} (hs : ∀ x, ∃ i, x ≤ s i) :
(⨆ x, f (s x)) = ⨆ y, f y :=
le_antisymm (supr_comp_le _ _) (supr_le_supr2 $ λ x, (hs x).imp $ λ i hi, hf hi)
lemma function.surjective.supr_comp {α : Type*} [has_Sup α] {f : ι → ι₂}
(hf : function.surjective f) (g : ι₂ → α) :
(⨆ x, g (f x)) = ⨆ y, g y :=
by simp only [supr, hf.range_comp]
lemma supr_congr {α : Type*} [has_Sup α] {f : ι → α} {g : ι₂ → α} (h : ι → ι₂)
(h1 : function.surjective h) (h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : (⨆ x, f x) = ⨆ y, g y :=
by { convert h1.supr_comp g, exact (funext h2).symm }
-- TODO: finish doesn't do well here.
@[congr] theorem supr_congr_Prop {α : Type*} [has_Sup α] {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → α} {f₂ : q → α}
(pq : p ↔ q) (f : ∀x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : supr f₁ = supr f₂ :=
begin
have : f₁ ∘ pq.mpr = f₂ := funext f,
rw [← this],
refine (function.surjective.supr_comp (λ h, ⟨pq.1 h, _⟩) f₁).symm,
refl
end
theorem infi_le (s : ι → α) (i : ι) : infi s ≤ s i :=
Inf_le ⟨i, rfl⟩
@[ematch] theorem infi_le' (s : ι → α) (i : ι) : (: infi s ≤ s i :) :=
Inf_le ⟨i, rfl⟩
theorem infi_le_of_le (i : ι) (h : s i ≤ a) : infi s ≤ a :=
le_trans (infi_le _ i) h
theorem binfi_le {p : ι → Prop} {f : Π i (hi : p i), α} (i : ι) (hi : p i) :
(⨅ i hi, f i hi) ≤ f i hi :=
infi_le_of_le i $ infi_le (f i) hi
theorem binfi_le_of_le {p : ι → Prop} {f : Π i (hi : p i), α} (i : ι) (hi : p i) (h : f i hi ≤ a) :
(⨅ i hi, f i hi) ≤ a :=
le_trans (binfi_le i hi) h
theorem le_infi (h : ∀i, a ≤ s i) : a ≤ infi s :=
le_Inf $ assume b ⟨i, eq⟩, eq ▸ h i
theorem le_binfi {p : ι → Prop} {f : Π i (h : p i), α} (h : ∀ i hi, a ≤ f i hi) :
a ≤ ⨅ i hi, f i hi :=
le_infi $ λ i, le_infi $ h i
theorem infi_le_binfi (p : ι → Prop) (f : ι → α) : (⨅ i, f i) ≤ ⨅ i (H : p i), f i :=
le_binfi (λ i hi, infi_le f i)
theorem infi_le_infi (h : ∀i, s i ≤ t i) : infi s ≤ infi t :=
le_infi $ assume i, infi_le_of_le i (h i)
theorem infi_le_infi2 {t : ι₂ → α} (h : ∀j, ∃i, s i ≤ t j) : infi s ≤ infi t :=
le_infi $ assume j, exists.elim (h j) infi_le_of_le
theorem binfi_le_binfi {p : ι → Prop} {f g : Π i (h : p i), α} (h : ∀ i hi, f i hi ≤ g i hi) :
(⨅ i hi, f i hi) ≤ ⨅ i hi, g i hi :=
le_binfi $ λ i hi, le_trans (binfi_le i hi) (h i hi)
theorem infi_le_infi_const (h : ι₂ → ι) : (⨅ i:ι, a) ≤ (⨅ j:ι₂, a) :=
le_infi $ infi_le _ ∘ h
@[simp] theorem le_infi_iff : a ≤ infi s ↔ (∀i, a ≤ s i) :=
⟨assume : a ≤ infi s, assume i, le_trans this (infi_le _ _), le_infi⟩
theorem Inf_eq_infi {s : set α} : Inf s = (⨅a ∈ s, a) :=
@Sup_eq_supr (order_dual α) _ _
lemma monotone.map_infi_le [complete_lattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : monotone f) :
f (infi s) ≤ (⨅ i, f (s i)) :=
le_infi $ λ i, hf $ infi_le _ _
lemma monotone.map_infi2_le [complete_lattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : monotone f)
{ι' : ι → Sort*} (s : Π i, ι' i → α) :
f (⨅ i (h : ι' i), s i h) ≤ (⨅ i (h : ι' i), f (s i h)) :=
@monotone.le_map_supr2 (order_dual α) (order_dual β) _ _ _ f hf.order_dual _ _
lemma monotone.map_Inf_le [complete_lattice β] {s : set α} {f : α → β} (hf : monotone f) :
f (Inf s) ≤ ⨅ a∈s, f a :=
by rw [Inf_eq_infi]; exact hf.map_infi2_le _
lemma le_infi_comp {ι' : Sort*} (f : ι' → α) (g : ι → ι') :
(⨅ y, f y) ≤ ⨅ x, f (g x) :=
infi_le_infi2 $ λ x, ⟨_, le_refl _⟩
lemma monotone.infi_comp_eq [preorder β] {f : β → α} (hf : monotone f)
{s : ι → β} (hs : ∀ x, ∃ i, s i ≤ x) :
(⨅ x, f (s x)) = ⨅ y, f y :=
le_antisymm (infi_le_infi2 $ λ x, (hs x).imp $ λ i hi, hf hi) (le_infi_comp _ _)
lemma function.surjective.infi_comp {α : Type*} [has_Inf α] {f : ι → ι₂}
(hf : function.surjective f) (g : ι₂ → α) :
(⨅ x, g (f x)) = ⨅ y, g y :=
@function.surjective.supr_comp _ _ (order_dual α) _ f hf g
lemma infi_congr {α : Type*} [has_Inf α] {f : ι → α} {g : ι₂ → α} (h : ι → ι₂)
(h1 : function.surjective h) (h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : (⨅ x, f x) = ⨅ y, g y :=
@supr_congr _ _ (order_dual α) _ _ _ h h1 h2
@[congr] theorem infi_congr_Prop {α : Type*} [has_Inf α] {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → α} {f₂ : q → α}
(pq : p ↔ q) (f : ∀x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : infi f₁ = infi f₂ :=
@supr_congr_Prop (order_dual α) _ p q f₁ f₂ pq f
lemma supr_const_le {x : α} : (⨆ (h : ι), x) ≤ x :=
supr_le (λ _, le_rfl)
lemma le_infi_const {x : α} : x ≤ (⨅ (h : ι), x) :=
le_infi (λ _, le_rfl)
-- We will generalize this to conditionally complete lattices in `cinfi_const`.
theorem infi_const [nonempty ι] {a : α} : (⨅ b:ι, a) = a :=
by rw [infi, range_const, Inf_singleton]
-- We will generalize this to conditionally complete lattices in `csupr_const`.
theorem supr_const [nonempty ι] {a : α} : (⨆ b:ι, a) = a :=
@infi_const (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
@[simp] lemma infi_top : (⨅i:ι, ⊤ : α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique $ le_infi $ assume i, le_refl _
@[simp] lemma supr_bot : (⨆i:ι, ⊥ : α) = ⊥ :=
@infi_top (order_dual α) _ _
@[simp] lemma infi_eq_top : infi s = ⊤ ↔ (∀i, s i = ⊤) :=
Inf_eq_top.trans forall_range_iff
@[simp] lemma supr_eq_bot : supr s = ⊥ ↔ (∀i, s i = ⊥) :=
Sup_eq_bot.trans forall_range_iff
@[simp] lemma infi_pos {p : Prop} {f : p → α} (hp : p) : (⨅ h : p, f h) = f hp :=
le_antisymm (infi_le _ _) (le_infi $ assume h, le_refl _)
@[simp] lemma infi_neg {p : Prop} {f : p → α} (hp : ¬ p) : (⨅ h : p, f h) = ⊤ :=
le_antisymm le_top $ le_infi $ assume h, (hp h).elim
@[simp] lemma supr_pos {p : Prop} {f : p → α} (hp : p) : (⨆ h : p, f h) = f hp :=
le_antisymm (supr_le $ assume h, le_refl _) (le_supr _ _)
@[simp] lemma supr_neg {p : Prop} {f : p → α} (hp : ¬ p) : (⨆ h : p, f h) = ⊥ :=
le_antisymm (supr_le $ assume h, (hp h).elim) bot_le
lemma supr_eq_dif {p : Prop} [decidable p] (a : p → α) :
(⨆h:p, a h) = (if h : p then a h else ⊥) :=
by by_cases p; simp [h]
lemma supr_eq_if {p : Prop} [decidable p] (a : α) :
(⨆h:p, a) = (if p then a else ⊥) :=
supr_eq_dif (λ _, a)
lemma infi_eq_dif {p : Prop} [decidable p] (a : p → α) :
(⨅h:p, a h) = (if h : p then a h else ⊤) :=
@supr_eq_dif (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
lemma infi_eq_if {p : Prop} [decidable p] (a : α) :
(⨅h:p, a) = (if p then a else ⊤) :=
infi_eq_dif (λ _, a)
-- TODO: should this be @[simp]?
theorem infi_comm {f : ι → ι₂ → α} : (⨅i, ⨅j, f i j) = (⨅j, ⨅i, f i j) :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume i, le_infi $ assume j, infi_le_of_le j $ infi_le _ i)
(le_infi $ assume j, le_infi $ assume i, infi_le_of_le i $ infi_le _ j)
/- TODO: this is strange. In the proof below, we get exactly the desired
among the equalities, but close does not get it.
begin
apply @le_antisymm,
simp, intros,
begin [smt]
ematch, ematch, ematch, trace_state, have := le_refl (f i_1 i),
trace_state, close
end
end
-/
-- TODO: should this be @[simp]?
theorem supr_comm {f : ι → ι₂ → α} : (⨆i, ⨆j, f i j) = (⨆j, ⨆i, f i j) :=
@infi_comm (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
@[simp] theorem infi_infi_eq_left {b : β} {f : Πx:β, x = b → α} :
(⨅x, ⨅h:x = b, f x h) = f b rfl :=
le_antisymm
(infi_le_of_le b $ infi_le _ rfl)
(le_infi $ assume b', le_infi $ assume eq, match b', eq with ._, rfl := le_refl _ end)
@[simp] theorem infi_infi_eq_right {b : β} {f : Πx:β, b = x → α} :
(⨅x, ⨅h:b = x, f x h) = f b rfl :=
le_antisymm
(infi_le_of_le b $ infi_le _ rfl)
(le_infi $ assume b', le_infi $ assume eq, match b', eq with ._, rfl := le_refl _ end)
@[simp] theorem supr_supr_eq_left {b : β} {f : Πx:β, x = b → α} :
(⨆x, ⨆h : x = b, f x h) = f b rfl :=
@infi_infi_eq_left (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
@[simp] theorem supr_supr_eq_right {b : β} {f : Πx:β, b = x → α} :
(⨆x, ⨆h : b = x, f x h) = f b rfl :=
@infi_infi_eq_right (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
attribute [ematch] le_refl
theorem infi_subtype {p : ι → Prop} {f : subtype p → α} : (⨅ x, f x) = (⨅ i (h:p i), f ⟨i, h⟩) :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume i, le_infi $ assume : p i, infi_le _ _)
(le_infi $ assume ⟨i, h⟩, infi_le_of_le i $ infi_le _ _)
lemma infi_subtype' {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α} :
(⨅ i (h : p i), f i h) = (⨅ x : subtype p, f x x.property) :=
(@infi_subtype _ _ _ p (λ x, f x.val x.property)).symm
lemma infi_subtype'' {ι} (s : set ι) (f : ι → α) :
(⨅ i : s, f i) = ⨅ (t : ι) (H : t ∈ s), f t :=
infi_subtype
theorem infi_inf_eq {f g : ι → α} : (⨅ x, f x ⊓ g x) = (⨅ x, f x) ⊓ (⨅ x, g x) :=
le_antisymm
(le_inf
(le_infi $ assume i, infi_le_of_le i inf_le_left)
(le_infi $ assume i, infi_le_of_le i inf_le_right))
(le_infi $ assume i, le_inf
(inf_le_left_of_le $ infi_le _ _)
(inf_le_right_of_le $ infi_le _ _))
/- TODO: here is another example where more flexible pattern matching
might help.
begin
apply @le_antisymm,
safe, pose h := f a ⊓ g a, begin [smt] ematch, ematch end
end
-/
lemma infi_inf [h : nonempty ι] {f : ι → α} {a : α} : (⨅x, f x) ⊓ a = (⨅ x, f x ⊓ a) :=
by rw [infi_inf_eq, infi_const]
lemma inf_infi [nonempty ι] {f : ι → α} {a : α} : a ⊓ (⨅x, f x) = (⨅ x, a ⊓ f x) :=
by rw [inf_comm, infi_inf]; simp [inf_comm]
lemma binfi_inf {p : ι → Prop} {f : Π i (hi : p i), α} {a : α} (h : ∃ i, p i) :
(⨅i (h : p i), f i h) ⊓ a = (⨅ i (h : p i), f i h ⊓ a) :=
by haveI : nonempty {i // p i} := (let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h in ⟨⟨i, hi⟩⟩);
rw [infi_subtype', infi_subtype', infi_inf]
lemma inf_binfi {p : ι → Prop} {f : Π i (hi : p i), α} {a : α} (h : ∃ i, p i) :
a ⊓ (⨅i (h : p i), f i h) = (⨅ i (h : p i), a ⊓ f i h) :=
by simpa only [inf_comm] using binfi_inf h
theorem supr_sup_eq {f g : β → α} : (⨆ x, f x ⊔ g x) = (⨆ x, f x) ⊔ (⨆ x, g x) :=
@infi_inf_eq (order_dual α) β _ _ _
lemma supr_sup [h : nonempty ι] {f : ι → α} {a : α} : (⨆ x, f x) ⊔ a = (⨆ x, f x ⊔ a) :=
@infi_inf (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _
lemma sup_supr [nonempty ι] {f : ι → α} {a : α} : a ⊔ (⨆ x, f x) = (⨆ x, a ⊔ f x) :=
@inf_infi (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _
/- supr and infi under Prop -/
@[simp] theorem infi_false {s : false → α} : infi s = ⊤ :=
le_antisymm le_top (le_infi $ assume i, false.elim i)
@[simp] theorem supr_false {s : false → α} : supr s = ⊥ :=
le_antisymm (supr_le $ assume i, false.elim i) bot_le
@[simp] theorem infi_true {s : true → α} : infi s = s trivial :=
le_antisymm (infi_le _ _) (le_infi $ assume ⟨⟩, le_refl _)
@[simp] theorem supr_true {s : true → α} : supr s = s trivial :=
le_antisymm (supr_le $ assume ⟨⟩, le_refl _) (le_supr _ _)
@[simp] theorem infi_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → α} :
(⨅ x, f x) = (⨅ i, ⨅ h:p i, f ⟨i, h⟩) :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume i, le_infi $ assume : p i, infi_le _ _)
(le_infi $ assume ⟨i, h⟩, infi_le_of_le i $ infi_le _ _)
@[simp] theorem supr_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → α} :
(⨆ x, f x) = (⨆ i, ⨆ h:p i, f ⟨i, h⟩) :=
@infi_exists (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
theorem infi_and {p q : Prop} {s : p ∧ q → α} : infi s = (⨅ h₁ h₂, s ⟨h₁, h₂⟩) :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume i, le_infi $ assume j, infi_le _ _)
(le_infi $ assume ⟨i, h⟩, infi_le_of_le i $ infi_le _ _)
/-- The symmetric case of `infi_and`, useful for rewriting into a infimum over a conjunction -/
lemma infi_and' {p q : Prop} {s : p → q → α} :
(⨅ (h₁ : p) (h₂ : q), s h₁ h₂) = ⨅ (h : p ∧ q), s h.1 h.2 :=
by { symmetry, exact infi_and }
theorem supr_and {p q : Prop} {s : p ∧ q → α} : supr s = (⨆ h₁ h₂, s ⟨h₁, h₂⟩) :=
@infi_and (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
/-- The symmetric case of `supr_and`, useful for rewriting into a supremum over a conjunction -/
lemma supr_and' {p q : Prop} {s : p → q → α} :
(⨆ (h₁ : p) (h₂ : q), s h₁ h₂) = ⨆ (h : p ∧ q), s h.1 h.2 :=
by { symmetry, exact supr_and }
theorem infi_or {p q : Prop} {s : p ∨ q → α} :
infi s = (⨅ h : p, s (or.inl h)) ⊓ (⨅ h : q, s (or.inr h)) :=
le_antisymm
(le_inf
(infi_le_infi2 $ assume j, ⟨_, le_refl _⟩)
(infi_le_infi2 $ assume j, ⟨_, le_refl _⟩))
(le_infi $ assume i, match i with
| or.inl i := inf_le_left_of_le $ infi_le _ _
| or.inr j := inf_le_right_of_le $ infi_le _ _
end)
theorem supr_or {p q : Prop} {s : p ∨ q → α} :
(⨆ x, s x) = (⨆ i, s (or.inl i)) ⊔ (⨆ j, s (or.inr j)) :=
@infi_or (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
lemma Sup_range {α : Type*} [has_Sup α] {f : ι → α} : Sup (range f) = supr f := rfl
lemma Inf_range {α : Type*} [has_Inf α] {f : ι → α} : Inf (range f) = infi f := rfl
lemma supr_range {g : β → α} {f : ι → β} : (⨆b∈range f, g b) = (⨆i, g (f i)) :=
le_antisymm
(supr_le $ assume b, supr_le $ assume ⟨i, (h : f i = b)⟩, h ▸ le_supr _ i)
(supr_le $ assume i, le_supr_of_le (f i) $ le_supr (λp, g (f i)) (mem_range_self _))
lemma infi_range {g : β → α} {f : ι → β} : (⨅b∈range f, g b) = (⨅i, g (f i)) :=
@supr_range (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _
theorem Inf_image {s : set β} {f : β → α} : Inf (f '' s) = (⨅ a ∈ s, f a) :=
by rw [← infi_subtype'', infi, range_comp, subtype.range_coe]
theorem Sup_image {s : set β} {f : β → α} : Sup (f '' s) = (⨆ a ∈ s, f a) :=
@Inf_image (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
/-
### supr and infi under set constructions
-/
theorem infi_emptyset {f : β → α} : (⨅ x ∈ (∅ : set β), f x) = ⊤ :=
by simp
theorem supr_emptyset {f : β → α} : (⨆ x ∈ (∅ : set β), f x) = ⊥ :=
by simp
theorem infi_univ {f : β → α} : (⨅ x ∈ (univ : set β), f x) = (⨅ x, f x) :=
by simp
theorem supr_univ {f : β → α} : (⨆ x ∈ (univ : set β), f x) = (⨆ x, f x) :=
by simp
theorem infi_union {f : β → α} {s t : set β} : (⨅ x ∈ s ∪ t, f x) = (⨅x∈s, f x) ⊓ (⨅x∈t, f x) :=
by simp only [← infi_inf_eq, infi_or]
lemma infi_split (f : β → α) (p : β → Prop) :
(⨅ i, f i) = (⨅ i (h : p i), f i) ⊓ (⨅ i (h : ¬ p i), f i) :=
by simpa [classical.em] using @infi_union _ _ _ f {i | p i} {i | ¬ p i}
lemma infi_split_single (f : β → α) (i₀ : β) :
(⨅ i, f i) = f i₀ ⊓ (⨅ i (h : i ≠ i₀), f i) :=
by convert infi_split _ _; simp
theorem infi_le_infi_of_subset {f : β → α} {s t : set β} (h : s ⊆ t) :
(⨅ x ∈ t, f x) ≤ (⨅ x ∈ s, f x) :=
by rw [(union_eq_self_of_subset_left h).symm, infi_union]; exact inf_le_left
theorem supr_union {f : β → α} {s t : set β} : (⨆ x ∈ s ∪ t, f x) = (⨆x∈s, f x) ⊔ (⨆x∈t, f x) :=
@infi_union (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _
lemma supr_split (f : β → α) (p : β → Prop) :
(⨆ i, f i) = (⨆ i (h : p i), f i) ⊔ (⨆ i (h : ¬ p i), f i) :=
@infi_split (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
lemma supr_split_single (f : β → α) (i₀ : β) :
(⨆ i, f i) = f i₀ ⊔ (⨆ i (h : i ≠ i₀), f i) :=
@infi_split_single (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
theorem supr_le_supr_of_subset {f : β → α} {s t : set β} (h : s ⊆ t) :
(⨆ x ∈ s, f x) ≤ (⨆ x ∈ t, f x) :=
@infi_le_infi_of_subset (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _ h
theorem infi_insert {f : β → α} {s : set β} {b : β} :
(⨅ x ∈ insert b s, f x) = f b ⊓ (⨅x∈s, f x) :=
eq.trans infi_union $ congr_arg (λx:α, x ⊓ (⨅x∈s, f x)) infi_infi_eq_left
theorem supr_insert {f : β → α} {s : set β} {b : β} :
(⨆ x ∈ insert b s, f x) = f b ⊔ (⨆x∈s, f x) :=
eq.trans supr_union $ congr_arg (λx:α, x ⊔ (⨆x∈s, f x)) supr_supr_eq_left
theorem infi_singleton {f : β → α} {b : β} : (⨅ x ∈ (singleton b : set β), f x) = f b :=
by simp
theorem infi_pair {f : β → α} {a b : β} : (⨅ x ∈ ({a, b} : set β), f x) = f a ⊓ f b :=
by rw [infi_insert, infi_singleton]
theorem supr_singleton {f : β → α} {b : β} : (⨆ x ∈ (singleton b : set β), f x) = f b :=
@infi_singleton (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
theorem supr_pair {f : β → α} {a b : β} : (⨆ x ∈ ({a, b} : set β), f x) = f a ⊔ f b :=
by rw [supr_insert, supr_singleton]
lemma infi_image {γ} {f : β → γ} {g : γ → α} {t : set β} :
(⨅ c ∈ f '' t, g c) = (⨅ b ∈ t, g (f b)) :=
by rw [← Inf_image, ← Inf_image, ← image_comp]
lemma supr_image {γ} {f : β → γ} {g : γ → α} {t : set β} :
(⨆ c ∈ f '' t, g c) = (⨆ b ∈ t, g (f b)) :=
@infi_image (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _ _
/-!
### `supr` and `infi` under `Type`
-/
theorem infi_of_empty' (h : ι → false) {s : ι → α} : infi s = ⊤ :=
top_unique (le_infi $ assume i, (h i).elim)
theorem supr_of_empty' (h : ι → false) {s : ι → α} : supr s = ⊥ :=
bot_unique (supr_le $ assume i, (h i).elim)
theorem infi_of_empty (h : ¬nonempty ι) {s : ι → α} : infi s = ⊤ :=
infi_of_empty' (λ i, h ⟨i⟩)
theorem supr_of_empty (h : ¬nonempty ι) {s : ι → α} : supr s = ⊥ :=
supr_of_empty' (λ i, h ⟨i⟩)
@[simp] theorem infi_empty {s : empty → α} : infi s = ⊤ :=
infi_of_empty nonempty_empty
@[simp] theorem supr_empty {s : empty → α} : supr s = ⊥ :=
supr_of_empty nonempty_empty
lemma supr_bool_eq {f : bool → α} : (⨆b:bool, f b) = f tt ⊔ f ff :=
le_antisymm
(supr_le $ assume b, match b with tt := le_sup_left | ff := le_sup_right end)
(sup_le (le_supr _ _) (le_supr _ _))
lemma infi_bool_eq {f : bool → α} : (⨅b:bool, f b) = f tt ⊓ f ff :=
@supr_bool_eq (order_dual α) _ _
lemma is_glb_binfi {s : set β} {f : β → α} : is_glb (f '' s) (⨅ x ∈ s, f x) :=
by simpa only [range_comp, subtype.range_coe, infi_subtype'] using @is_glb_infi α s _ (f ∘ coe)
theorem supr_subtype {p : ι → Prop} {f : subtype p → α} : (⨆ x, f x) = (⨆ i (h:p i), f ⟨i, h⟩) :=
@infi_subtype (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
lemma supr_subtype' {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α} :
(⨆ i (h : p i), f i h) = (⨆ x : subtype p, f x x.property) :=
(@supr_subtype _ _ _ p (λ x, f x.val x.property)).symm
lemma Sup_eq_supr' {s : set α} : Sup s = ⨆ x : s, (x : α) :=
by rw [Sup_eq_supr, supr_subtype']; refl
lemma is_lub_bsupr {s : set β} {f : β → α} : is_lub (f '' s) (⨆ x ∈ s, f x) :=
by simpa only [range_comp, subtype.range_coe, supr_subtype'] using @is_lub_supr α s _ (f ∘ coe)
theorem infi_sigma {p : β → Type*} {f : sigma p → α} : (⨅ x, f x) = (⨅ i (h:p i), f ⟨i, h⟩) :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume i, le_infi $ assume : p i, infi_le _ _)
(le_infi $ assume ⟨i, h⟩, infi_le_of_le i $ infi_le _ _)
theorem supr_sigma {p : β → Type*} {f : sigma p → α} : (⨆ x, f x) = (⨆ i (h:p i), f ⟨i, h⟩) :=
@infi_sigma (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
theorem infi_prod {γ : Type*} {f : β × γ → α} : (⨅ x, f x) = (⨅ i j, f (i, j)) :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume i, le_infi $ assume j, infi_le _ _)
(le_infi $ assume ⟨i, h⟩, infi_le_of_le i $ infi_le _ _)
theorem supr_prod {γ : Type*} {f : β × γ → α} : (⨆ x, f x) = (⨆ i j, f (i, j)) :=
@infi_prod (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
theorem infi_sum {γ : Type*} {f : β ⊕ γ → α} :
(⨅ x, f x) = (⨅ i, f (sum.inl i)) ⊓ (⨅ j, f (sum.inr j)) :=
le_antisymm
(le_inf
(infi_le_infi2 $ assume i, ⟨_, le_refl _⟩)
(infi_le_infi2 $ assume j, ⟨_, le_refl _⟩))
(le_infi $ assume s, match s with
| sum.inl i := inf_le_left_of_le $ infi_le _ _
| sum.inr j := inf_le_right_of_le $ infi_le _ _
end)
theorem supr_sum {γ : Type*} {f : β ⊕ γ → α} :
(⨆ x, f x) = (⨆ i, f (sum.inl i)) ⊔ (⨆ j, f (sum.inr j)) :=
@infi_sum (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
/-!
### `supr` and `infi` under `ℕ`
-/
lemma supr_ge_eq_supr_nat_add {u : ℕ → α} (n : ℕ) : (⨆ i ≥ n, u i) = ⨆ i, u (i + n) :=
begin
apply le_antisymm;
simp only [supr_le_iff],
{ exact λ i hi, le_Sup ⟨i - n, by { dsimp only, rw nat.sub_add_cancel hi }⟩ },
{ exact λ i, le_Sup ⟨i + n, supr_pos (nat.le_add_left _ _)⟩ }
end
lemma infi_ge_eq_infi_nat_add {u : ℕ → α} (n : ℕ) : (⨅ i ≥ n, u i) = ⨅ i, u (i + n) :=
@supr_ge_eq_supr_nat_add (order_dual α) _ _ _
lemma monotone.supr_nat_add {f : ℕ → α} (hf : monotone f) (k : ℕ) :
(⨆ n, f (n + k)) = ⨆ n, f n :=
le_antisymm (supr_le (λ i, (le_refl _).trans (le_supr _ (i + k))))
(supr_le_supr (λ i, hf (nat.le_add_right i k)))
@[simp] lemma supr_infi_ge_nat_add (f : ℕ → α) (k : ℕ) :
(⨆ n, ⨅ i ≥ n, f (i + k)) = ⨆ n, ⨅ i ≥ n, f i :=
begin
have hf : monotone (λ n, ⨅ i ≥ n, f i),
from λ n m hnm, le_infi (λ i, (infi_le _ i).trans (le_infi (λ h, infi_le _ (hnm.trans h)))),
rw ←monotone.supr_nat_add hf k,
{ simp_rw [infi_ge_eq_infi_nat_add, ←nat.add_assoc], },
end
end
section complete_linear_order
variables [complete_linear_order α]
lemma supr_eq_top (f : ι → α) : supr f = ⊤ ↔ (∀b<⊤, ∃i, b < f i) :=
by simp only [← Sup_range, Sup_eq_top, set.exists_range_iff]
lemma infi_eq_bot (f : ι → α) : infi f = ⊥ ↔ (∀b>⊥, ∃i, f i < b) :=
by simp only [← Inf_range, Inf_eq_bot, set.exists_range_iff]
end complete_linear_order
/-!
### Instances
-/
instance complete_lattice_Prop : complete_lattice Prop :=
{ Sup := λs, ∃a∈s, a,
le_Sup := assume s a h p, ⟨a, h, p⟩,
Sup_le := assume s a h ⟨b, h', p⟩, h b h' p,
Inf := λs, ∀a:Prop, a∈s → a,
Inf_le := assume s a h p, p a h,
le_Inf := assume s a h p b hb, h b hb p,
.. bounded_distrib_lattice_Prop }
lemma Inf_Prop_eq {s : set Prop} : Inf s = (∀p ∈ s, p) := rfl
lemma Sup_Prop_eq {s : set Prop} : Sup s = (∃p ∈ s, p) := rfl
lemma infi_Prop_eq {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} : (⨅i, p i) = (∀i, p i) :=
le_antisymm (assume h i, h _ ⟨i, rfl⟩ ) (assume h p ⟨i, eq⟩, eq ▸ h i)
lemma supr_Prop_eq {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} : (⨆i, p i) = (∃i, p i) :=
le_antisymm (λ ⟨q, ⟨i, (eq : p i = q)⟩, hq⟩, ⟨i, eq.symm ▸ hq⟩) (λ ⟨i, hi⟩, ⟨p i, ⟨i, rfl⟩, hi⟩)
instance pi.has_Sup {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} [Π i, has_Sup (β i)] : has_Sup (Π i, β i) :=
⟨λ s i, ⨆ f : s, (f : Π i, β i) i⟩
instance pi.has_Inf {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} [Π i, has_Inf (β i)] : has_Inf (Π i, β i) :=
⟨λ s i, ⨅ f : s, (f : Π i, β i) i⟩
instance pi.complete_lattice {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} [∀ i, complete_lattice (β i)] :
complete_lattice (Π i, β i) :=
{ Sup := Sup,
Inf := Inf,
le_Sup := λ s f hf i, le_supr (λ f : s, (f : Π i, β i) i) ⟨f, hf⟩,
Inf_le := λ s f hf i, infi_le (λ f : s, (f : Π i, β i) i) ⟨f, hf⟩,
Sup_le := λ s f hf i, supr_le $ λ g, hf g g.2 i,
le_Inf := λ s f hf i, le_infi $ λ g, hf g g.2 i,
.. pi.bounded_lattice }
lemma Inf_apply {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} [Π i, has_Inf (β i)]
{s : set (Πa, β a)} {a : α} :
(Inf s) a = (⨅ f : s, (f : Πa, β a) a) :=
rfl
lemma infi_apply {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} {ι : Sort*} [Π i, has_Inf (β i)]
{f : ι → Πa, β a} {a : α} :
(⨅i, f i) a = (⨅i, f i a) :=
by rw [infi, Inf_apply, infi, infi, ← image_eq_range (λ f : Π i, β i, f a) (range f), ← range_comp]
lemma Sup_apply {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} [Π i, has_Sup (β i)] {s : set (Πa, β a)} {a : α} :
(Sup s) a = (⨆f:s, (f : Πa, β a) a) :=
rfl
lemma supr_apply {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} {ι : Sort*} [Π i, has_Sup (β i)] {f : ι → Πa, β a}
{a : α} :
(⨆i, f i) a = (⨆i, f i a) :=
@infi_apply α (λ i, order_dual (β i)) _ _ f a
section complete_lattice
variables [preorder α] [complete_lattice β]
theorem monotone_Sup_of_monotone {s : set (α → β)} (m_s : ∀f∈s, monotone f) : monotone (Sup s) :=
assume x y h, supr_le $ λ f, le_supr_of_le f $ m_s f f.2 h
theorem monotone_Inf_of_monotone {s : set (α → β)} (m_s : ∀f∈s, monotone f) : monotone (Inf s) :=
assume x y h, le_infi $ λ f, infi_le_of_le f $ m_s f f.2 h
end complete_lattice
namespace prod
variables (α β)
instance [has_Inf α] [has_Inf β] : has_Inf (α × β) :=
⟨λs, (Inf (prod.fst '' s), Inf (prod.snd '' s))⟩
instance [has_Sup α] [has_Sup β] : has_Sup (α × β) :=
⟨λs, (Sup (prod.fst '' s), Sup (prod.snd '' s))⟩
instance [complete_lattice α] [complete_lattice β] : complete_lattice (α × β) :=
{ le_Sup := assume s p hab, ⟨le_Sup $ mem_image_of_mem _ hab, le_Sup $ mem_image_of_mem _ hab⟩,
Sup_le := assume s p h,
⟨ Sup_le $ ball_image_of_ball $ assume p hp, (h p hp).1,
Sup_le $ ball_image_of_ball $ assume p hp, (h p hp).2⟩,
Inf_le := assume s p hab, ⟨Inf_le $ mem_image_of_mem _ hab, Inf_le $ mem_image_of_mem _ hab⟩,
le_Inf := assume s p h,
⟨ le_Inf $ ball_image_of_ball $ assume p hp, (h p hp).1,
le_Inf $ ball_image_of_ball $ assume p hp, (h p hp).2⟩,
.. prod.bounded_lattice α β,
.. prod.has_Sup α β,
.. prod.has_Inf α β }
end prod
section complete_lattice
variables [complete_lattice α] {a : α} {s : set α}
/-- This is a weaker version of `sup_Inf_eq` -/
lemma sup_Inf_le_infi_sup :
a ⊔ Inf s ≤ (⨅ b ∈ s, a ⊔ b) :=
le_infi $ assume i, le_infi $ assume h, sup_le_sup_left (Inf_le h) _
/-- This is a weaker version of `Inf_sup_eq` -/
lemma Inf_sup_le_infi_sup :
Inf s ⊔ a ≤ (⨅ b ∈ s, b ⊔ a) :=
le_infi $ assume i, le_infi $ assume h, sup_le_sup_right (Inf_le h) _
/-- This is a weaker version of `inf_Sup_eq` -/
lemma supr_inf_le_inf_Sup :
(⨆ b ∈ s, a ⊓ b) ≤ a ⊓ Sup s :=
supr_le $ assume i, supr_le $ assume h, inf_le_inf_left _ (le_Sup h)
/-- This is a weaker version of `Sup_inf_eq` -/
lemma supr_inf_le_Sup_inf :
(⨆ b ∈ s, b ⊓ a) ≤ Sup s ⊓ a :=
supr_le $ assume i, supr_le $ assume h, inf_le_inf_right _ (le_Sup h)
lemma disjoint_Sup_left {a : set α} {b : α} (d : disjoint (Sup a) b) {i} (hi : i ∈ a) :
disjoint i b :=
(supr_le_iff.mp (supr_le_iff.mp (supr_inf_le_Sup_inf.trans (d : _)) i : _) hi : _)
lemma disjoint_Sup_right {a : set α} {b : α} (d : disjoint b (Sup a)) {i} (hi : i ∈ a) :
disjoint b i :=
(supr_le_iff.mp (supr_le_iff.mp (supr_inf_le_inf_Sup.trans (d : _)) i : _) hi : _)
end complete_lattice
namespace complete_lattice
variables [complete_lattice α]
/-- An independent set of elements in a complete lattice is one in which every element is disjoint
from the `Sup` of the rest. -/
def independent (s : set α) : Prop := ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → disjoint a (Sup (s \ {a}))
variables {s : set α} (hs : independent s)
@[simp]
lemma independent_empty : independent (∅ : set α) :=
λ x hx, (set.not_mem_empty x hx).elim
theorem independent.mono {t : set α} (hst : t ⊆ s) :
independent t :=
λ a ha, (hs (hst ha)).mono_right (Sup_le_Sup (diff_subset_diff_left hst))
/-- If the elements of a set are independent, then any pair within that set is disjoint. -/
lemma independent.disjoint {x y : α} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) (h : x ≠ y) : disjoint x y :=
disjoint_Sup_right (hs hx) ((mem_diff y).mpr ⟨hy, by simp [h.symm]⟩)
include hs
/-- If the elements of a set are independent, then any element is disjoint from the `Sup` of some
subset of the rest. -/
lemma independent.disjoint_Sup {x : α} {y : set α} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ⊆ s) (hxy : x ∉ y) :
disjoint x (Sup y) :=
begin
have := (hs.mono $ insert_subset.mpr ⟨hx, hy⟩) (mem_insert x _),
rw [insert_diff_of_mem _ (mem_singleton _), diff_singleton_eq_self hxy] at this,
exact this,
end
end complete_lattice
|
3f9c6d593c516eca8e7542534c2e0c808ac2f8b9 | 4d2583807a5ac6caaffd3d7a5f646d61ca85d532 | /src/measure_theory/integral/vitali_caratheodory.lean | ee826838287605267bfceef48501bc12744ff749 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AntoineChambert-Loir/mathlib | 64aabb896129885f12296a799818061bc90da1ff | 07be904260ab6e36a5769680b6012f03a4727134 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,187,631,771 | 1,636,719,886,000 | 1,636,719,886,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 29,686 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import measure_theory.measure.regular
import topology.semicontinuous
import measure_theory.integral.bochner
import topology.instances.ereal
/-!
# Vitali-Carathéodory theorem
Vitali-Carathéodory theorem asserts the following. Consider an integrable function `f : α → ℝ` on
a space with a regular measure. Then there exists a function `g : α → ereal` such that `f x < g x`
everywhere, `g` is lower semicontinuous, and the integral of `g` is arbitrarily close to that of
`f`. This theorem is proved in this file, as `exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_integral_lt`.
Symmetrically, there exists `g < f` which is upper semicontinuous, with integral arbitrarily close
to that of `f`. It follows from the previous statement applied to `-f`. It is formalized under
the name `exists_upper_semicontinuous_lt_integral_gt`.
The most classical version of Vitali-Carathéodory theorem only ensures a large inequality
`f x ≤ g x`. For applications to the fundamental theorem of calculus, though, the strict inequality
`f x < g x` is important. Therefore, we prove the stronger version with strict inequalities in this
file. There is a price to pay: we require that the measure is `σ`-finite, which is not necessary for
the classical Vitali-Carathéodory theorem. Since this is satisfied in all applications, this is
not a real problem.
## Sketch of proof
Decomposing `f` as the difference of its positive and negative parts, it suffices to show that a
positive function can be bounded from above by a lower semicontinuous function, and from below
by an upper semicontinuous function, with integrals close to that of `f`.
For the bound from above, write `f` as a series `∑' n, cₙ * indicator (sₙ)` of simple functions.
Then, approximate `sₙ` by a larger open set `uₙ` with measure very close to that of `sₙ` (this is
possible by regularity of the measure), and set `g = ∑' n, cₙ * indicator (uₙ)`. It is
lower semicontinuous as a series of lower semicontinuous functions, and its integral is arbitrarily
close to that of `f`.
For the bound from below, use finitely many terms in the series, and approximate `sₙ` from inside by
a closed set `Fₙ`. Then `∑ n < N, cₙ * indicator (Fₙ)` is bounded from above by `f`, it is
upper semicontinuous as a finite sum of upper semicontinuous functions, and its integral is
arbitrarily close to that of `f`.
The main pain point in the implementation is that one needs to jump between the spaces `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0`,
`ℝ≥0∞` and `ereal` (and be careful that addition is not well behaved on `ereal`), and between
`lintegral` and `integral`.
We first show the bound from above for simple functions and the nonnegative integral
(this is the main nontrivial mathematical point), then deduce it for general nonnegative functions,
first for the nonnegative integral and then for the Bochner integral.
Then we follow the same steps for the lower bound.
Finally, we glue them together to obtain the main statement
`exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_integral_lt`.
## Related results
Are you looking for a result on approximation by continuous functions (not just semicontinuous)?
See result `measure_theory.Lp.continuous_map_dense`, in the file
`measure_theory.continuous_map_dense`.
## References
[Rudin, *Real and Complex Analysis* (Theorem 2.24)][rudin2006real]
-/
open_locale ennreal nnreal
open measure_theory measure_theory.measure
variables {α : Type*} [topological_space α] [measurable_space α] [borel_space α] (μ : measure α)
[weakly_regular μ]
namespace measure_theory
local infixr ` →ₛ `:25 := simple_func
/-! ### Lower semicontinuous upper bound for nonnegative functions -/
/-- Given a simple function `f` with values in `ℝ≥0`, there exists a lower semicontinuous
function `g ≥ f` with integral arbitrarily close to that of `f`. Formulation in terms of
`lintegral`.
Auxiliary lemma for Vitali-Carathéodory theorem `exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_integral_lt`. -/
lemma simple_func.exists_le_lower_semicontinuous_lintegral_ge (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} (ε0 : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ g : α → ℝ≥0, (∀ x, f x ≤ g x) ∧ lower_semicontinuous g ∧
(∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ + ε) :=
begin
induction f using measure_theory.simple_func.induction with c s hs f₁ f₂ H h₁ h₂ generalizing ε,
{ let f := simple_func.piecewise s hs (simple_func.const α c) (simple_func.const α 0),
by_cases h : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ⊤,
{ refine ⟨λ x, c, λ x, _, lower_semicontinuous_const,
by simp only [ennreal.top_add, le_top, h]⟩,
simp only [simple_func.coe_const, simple_func.const_zero, simple_func.coe_zero,
set.piecewise_eq_indicator, simple_func.coe_piecewise],
exact set.indicator_le_self _ _ _ },
by_cases hc : c = 0,
{ refine ⟨λ x, 0, _, lower_semicontinuous_const, _⟩,
{ simp only [hc, set.indicator_zero', pi.zero_apply, simple_func.const_zero, implies_true_iff,
eq_self_iff_true, simple_func.coe_zero, set.piecewise_eq_indicator,
simple_func.coe_piecewise, le_zero_iff] },
{ simp only [lintegral_const, zero_mul, zero_le, ennreal.coe_zero] } },
have : μ s < μ s + ε / c,
{ have : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) < ε / c := ennreal.div_pos_iff.2 ⟨ε0, ennreal.coe_ne_top⟩,
simpa using ennreal.add_lt_add_left _ this,
simpa only [hs, hc, lt_top_iff_ne_top, true_and, simple_func.coe_const, function.const_apply,
lintegral_const, ennreal.coe_indicator, set.univ_inter, ennreal.coe_ne_top,
measurable_set.univ, with_top.mul_eq_top_iff, simple_func.const_zero, or_false,
lintegral_indicator, ennreal.coe_eq_zero, ne.def, not_false_iff, simple_func.coe_zero,
set.piecewise_eq_indicator, simple_func.coe_piecewise, false_and, restrict_apply] using h },
obtain ⟨u, su, u_open, μu⟩ : ∃ u ⊇ s, is_open u ∧ μ u < μ s + ε / c :=
s.exists_is_open_lt_of_lt _ this,
refine ⟨set.indicator u (λ x, c), λ x, _, u_open.lower_semicontinuous_indicator (zero_le _), _⟩,
{ simp only [simple_func.coe_const, simple_func.const_zero, simple_func.coe_zero,
set.piecewise_eq_indicator, simple_func.coe_piecewise],
exact set.indicator_le_indicator_of_subset su (λ x, zero_le _) _ },
{ suffices : (c : ℝ≥0∞) * μ u ≤ c * μ s + ε, by
simpa only [hs, u_open.measurable_set, simple_func.coe_const, function.const_apply,
lintegral_const, ennreal.coe_indicator, set.univ_inter, measurable_set.univ,
simple_func.const_zero, lintegral_indicator, simple_func.coe_zero,
set.piecewise_eq_indicator, simple_func.coe_piecewise, restrict_apply],
calc (c : ℝ≥0∞) * μ u ≤ c * (μ s + ε / c) : ennreal.mul_le_mul (le_refl _) μu.le
... = c * μ s + ε :
begin
simp_rw [mul_add],
rw ennreal.mul_div_cancel' _ ennreal.coe_ne_top,
simpa using hc,
end } },
{ rcases h₁ (ennreal.half_pos ε0).ne' with ⟨g₁, f₁_le_g₁, g₁cont, g₁int⟩,
rcases h₂ (ennreal.half_pos ε0).ne' with ⟨g₂, f₂_le_g₂, g₂cont, g₂int⟩,
refine ⟨λ x, g₁ x + g₂ x, λ x, add_le_add (f₁_le_g₁ x) (f₂_le_g₂ x), g₁cont.add g₂cont, _⟩,
simp only [simple_func.coe_add, ennreal.coe_add, pi.add_apply],
rw [lintegral_add f₁.measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal f₂.measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal,
lintegral_add g₁cont.measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal g₂cont.measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal],
convert add_le_add g₁int g₂int using 1,
conv_lhs { rw ← ennreal.add_halves ε },
abel }
end
open simple_func (eapprox_diff tsum_eapprox_diff)
/-- Given a measurable function `f` with values in `ℝ≥0`, there exists a lower semicontinuous
function `g ≥ f` with integral arbitrarily close to that of `f`. Formulation in terms of
`lintegral`.
Auxiliary lemma for Vitali-Carathéodory theorem `exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_integral_lt`. -/
lemma exists_le_lower_semicontinuous_lintegral_ge
(f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : measurable f) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (εpos : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ g : α → ℝ≥0∞, (∀ x, f x ≤ g x) ∧ lower_semicontinuous g ∧ (∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ + ε) :=
begin
rcases ennreal.exists_pos_sum_of_encodable' εpos ℕ with ⟨δ, δpos, hδ⟩,
have : ∀ n, ∃ g : α → ℝ≥0, (∀ x, simple_func.eapprox_diff f n x ≤ g x) ∧ lower_semicontinuous g ∧
(∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, simple_func.eapprox_diff f n x ∂μ + δ n) :=
λ n, simple_func.exists_le_lower_semicontinuous_lintegral_ge μ
(simple_func.eapprox_diff f n) (δpos n).ne',
choose g f_le_g gcont hg using this,
refine ⟨λ x, (∑' n, g n x), λ x, _, _, _⟩,
{ rw ← tsum_eapprox_diff f hf,
exact ennreal.tsum_le_tsum (λ n, ennreal.coe_le_coe.2 (f_le_g n x)) },
{ apply lower_semicontinuous_tsum (λ n, _),
exact ennreal.continuous_coe.comp_lower_semicontinuous (gcont n)
(λ x y hxy, ennreal.coe_le_coe.2 hxy) },
{ calc ∫⁻ x, ∑' (n : ℕ), g n x ∂μ
= ∑' n, ∫⁻ x, g n x ∂μ :
by rw lintegral_tsum (λ n, (gcont n).measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal)
... ≤ ∑' n, (∫⁻ x, eapprox_diff f n x ∂μ + δ n) : ennreal.tsum_le_tsum hg
... = ∑' n, (∫⁻ x, eapprox_diff f n x ∂μ) + ∑' n, δ n : ennreal.tsum_add
... ≤ ∫⁻ (x : α), f x ∂μ + ε :
begin
refine add_le_add _ hδ.le,
rw [← lintegral_tsum],
{ simp_rw [tsum_eapprox_diff f hf, le_refl] },
{ assume n, exact (simple_func.measurable _).coe_nnreal_ennreal }
end }
end
/-- Given a measurable function `f` with values in `ℝ≥0` in a sigma-finite space, there exists a
lower semicontinuous function `g > f` with integral arbitrarily close to that of `f`.
Formulation in terms of `lintegral`.
Auxiliary lemma for Vitali-Carathéodory theorem `exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_integral_lt`. -/
lemma exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_lintegral_ge [sigma_finite μ]
(f : α → ℝ≥0) (fmeas : measurable f) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (ε0 : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ g : α → ℝ≥0∞, (∀ x, (f x : ℝ≥0∞) < g x) ∧ lower_semicontinuous g ∧
(∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ + ε) :=
begin
have : ε / 2 ≠ 0 := (ennreal.half_pos ε0).ne',
rcases exists_pos_lintegral_lt_of_sigma_finite μ this with ⟨w, wpos, wmeas, wint⟩,
let f' := λ x, ((f x + w x : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞),
rcases exists_le_lower_semicontinuous_lintegral_ge μ f' (fmeas.add wmeas).coe_nnreal_ennreal this
with ⟨g, le_g, gcont, gint⟩,
refine ⟨g, λ x, _, gcont, _⟩,
{ calc (f x : ℝ≥0∞) < f' x : by simpa [← ennreal.coe_lt_coe] using add_lt_add_left (wpos x) (f x)
... ≤ g x : le_g x },
{ calc ∫⁻ (x : α), g x ∂μ
≤ ∫⁻ (x : α), f x + w x ∂μ + ε / 2 : gint
... = ∫⁻ (x : α), f x ∂ μ + ∫⁻ (x : α), w x ∂ μ + (ε / 2) :
by rw lintegral_add fmeas.coe_nnreal_ennreal wmeas.coe_nnreal_ennreal
... ≤ ∫⁻ (x : α), f x ∂ μ + ε / 2 + ε / 2 :
add_le_add_right (add_le_add_left wint.le _) _
... = ∫⁻ (x : α), f x ∂μ + ε : by rw [add_assoc, ennreal.add_halves] },
end
/-- Given an almost everywhere measurable function `f` with values in `ℝ≥0` in a sigma-finite space,
there exists a lower semicontinuous function `g > f` with integral arbitrarily close to that of `f`.
Formulation in terms of `lintegral`.
Auxiliary lemma for Vitali-Carathéodory theorem `exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_integral_lt`. -/
lemma exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_lintegral_ge_of_ae_measurable [sigma_finite μ]
(f : α → ℝ≥0) (fmeas : ae_measurable f μ) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (ε0 : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ g : α → ℝ≥0∞, (∀ x, (f x : ℝ≥0∞) < g x) ∧ lower_semicontinuous g ∧
(∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ + ε) :=
begin
have : ε / 2 ≠ 0 := (ennreal.half_pos ε0).ne',
rcases exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_lintegral_ge μ (fmeas.mk f) fmeas.measurable_mk this
with ⟨g0, f_lt_g0, g0_cont, g0_int⟩,
rcases exists_measurable_superset_of_null fmeas.ae_eq_mk with ⟨s, hs, smeas, μs⟩,
rcases exists_le_lower_semicontinuous_lintegral_ge μ (s.indicator (λ x, ∞))
(measurable_const.indicator smeas) this
with ⟨g1, le_g1, g1_cont, g1_int⟩,
refine ⟨λ x, g0 x + g1 x, λ x, _, g0_cont.add g1_cont, _⟩,
{ by_cases h : x ∈ s,
{ have := le_g1 x,
simp only [h, set.indicator_of_mem, top_le_iff] at this,
simp [this] },
{ have : f x = fmeas.mk f x,
by { rw set.compl_subset_comm at hs, exact hs h },
rw this,
exact (f_lt_g0 x).trans_le le_self_add } },
{ calc ∫⁻ x, g0 x + g1 x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, g0 x ∂μ + ∫⁻ x, g1 x ∂μ :
lintegral_add g0_cont.measurable g1_cont.measurable
... ≤ (∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ + ε / 2) + (0 + ε / 2) :
begin
refine add_le_add _ _,
{ convert g0_int using 2,
exact lintegral_congr_ae (fmeas.ae_eq_mk.fun_comp _) },
{ convert g1_int,
simp only [smeas, μs, lintegral_const, set.univ_inter, measurable_set.univ,
lintegral_indicator, mul_zero, restrict_apply] }
end
... = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ + ε : by simp only [add_assoc, ennreal.add_halves, zero_add] }
end
variable {μ}
/-- Given an integrable function `f` with values in `ℝ≥0` in a sigma-finite space, there exists a
lower semicontinuous function `g > f` with integral arbitrarily close to that of `f`.
Formulation in terms of `integral`.
Auxiliary lemma for Vitali-Carathéodory theorem `exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_integral_lt`. -/
lemma exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_integral_gt_nnreal [sigma_finite μ] (f : α → ℝ≥0)
(fint : integrable (λ x, (f x : ℝ)) μ) {ε : ℝ} (εpos : 0 < ε) :
∃ g : α → ℝ≥0∞, (∀ x, (f x : ℝ≥0∞) < g x) ∧ lower_semicontinuous g ∧ (∀ᵐ x ∂ μ, g x < ⊤)
∧ (integrable (λ x, (g x).to_real) μ) ∧ (∫ x, (g x).to_real ∂μ < ∫ x, f x ∂μ + ε) :=
begin
have fmeas : ae_measurable f μ,
by { convert fint.ae_measurable.real_to_nnreal, ext1 x, simp only [real.to_nnreal_coe] },
lift ε to ℝ≥0 using εpos.le,
obtain ⟨δ, δpos, hδε⟩ : ∃ δ : ℝ≥0, 0 < δ ∧ δ < ε, from exists_between εpos,
have int_f_ne_top : ∫⁻ (a : α), (f a) ∂μ ≠ ∞ :=
(has_finite_integral_iff_of_nnreal.1 fint.has_finite_integral).ne,
rcases exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_lintegral_ge_of_ae_measurable μ f fmeas
(ennreal.coe_ne_zero.2 δpos.ne')
with ⟨g, f_lt_g, gcont, gint⟩,
have gint_ne : ∫⁻ (x : α), g x ∂μ ≠ ∞ := ne_top_of_le_ne_top (by simpa) gint,
have g_lt_top : ∀ᵐ (x : α) ∂μ, g x < ∞ := ae_lt_top gcont.measurable gint_ne,
have Ig : ∫⁻ (a : α), ennreal.of_real (g a).to_real ∂μ = ∫⁻ (a : α), g a ∂μ,
{ apply lintegral_congr_ae,
filter_upwards [g_lt_top],
assume x hx,
simp only [hx.ne, ennreal.of_real_to_real, ne.def, not_false_iff] },
refine ⟨g, f_lt_g, gcont, g_lt_top, _, _⟩,
{ refine ⟨gcont.measurable.ennreal_to_real.ae_measurable, _⟩,
simp only [has_finite_integral_iff_norm, real.norm_eq_abs,
abs_of_nonneg ennreal.to_real_nonneg],
convert gint_ne.lt_top using 1 },
{ rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae, integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae],
{ calc
ennreal.to_real (∫⁻ (a : α), ennreal.of_real (g a).to_real ∂μ)
= ennreal.to_real (∫⁻ (a : α), g a ∂μ) : by congr' 1
... ≤ ennreal.to_real (∫⁻ (a : α), f a ∂μ + δ) :
begin
apply ennreal.to_real_mono _ gint,
simpa using int_f_ne_top,
end
... = ennreal.to_real (∫⁻ (a : α), f a ∂μ) + δ :
by rw [ennreal.to_real_add int_f_ne_top ennreal.coe_ne_top, ennreal.coe_to_real]
... < ennreal.to_real (∫⁻ (a : α), f a ∂μ) + ε :
add_lt_add_left hδε _
... = (∫⁻ (a : α), ennreal.of_real ↑(f a) ∂μ).to_real + ε :
by simp },
{ apply filter.eventually_of_forall (λ x, _), simp },
{ exact fmeas.coe_nnreal_real, },
{ apply filter.eventually_of_forall (λ x, _), simp },
{ apply gcont.measurable.ennreal_to_real.ae_measurable } }
end
/-! ### Upper semicontinuous lower bound for nonnegative functions -/
/-- Given a simple function `f` with values in `ℝ≥0`, there exists an upper semicontinuous
function `g ≤ f` with integral arbitrarily close to that of `f`. Formulation in terms of
`lintegral`.
Auxiliary lemma for Vitali-Carathéodory theorem `exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_integral_lt`. -/
lemma simple_func.exists_upper_semicontinuous_le_lintegral_le
(f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0) (int_f : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (ε0 : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ g : α → ℝ≥0, (∀ x, g x ≤ f x) ∧ upper_semicontinuous g ∧ (∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ + ε) :=
begin
induction f using measure_theory.simple_func.induction with c s hs f₁ f₂ H h₁ h₂ generalizing ε,
{ let f := simple_func.piecewise s hs (simple_func.const α c) (simple_func.const α 0),
by_cases hc : c = 0,
{ refine ⟨λ x, 0, _, upper_semicontinuous_const, _⟩,
{ simp only [hc, set.indicator_zero', pi.zero_apply, simple_func.const_zero, implies_true_iff,
eq_self_iff_true, simple_func.coe_zero, set.piecewise_eq_indicator,
simple_func.coe_piecewise, le_zero_iff] },
{ simp only [hc, set.indicator_zero', lintegral_const, zero_mul, pi.zero_apply,
simple_func.const_zero, zero_add, zero_le', simple_func.coe_zero,
set.piecewise_eq_indicator, ennreal.coe_zero, simple_func.coe_piecewise, zero_le] } },
have μs_lt_top : μ s < ∞,
by simpa only [hs, hc, lt_top_iff_ne_top, true_and, simple_func.coe_const, or_false,
lintegral_const, ennreal.coe_indicator, set.univ_inter, ennreal.coe_ne_top, restrict_apply
measurable_set.univ, with_top.mul_eq_top_iff, simple_func.const_zero, function.const_apply,
lintegral_indicator, ennreal.coe_eq_zero, ne.def, not_false_iff, simple_func.coe_zero,
set.piecewise_eq_indicator, simple_func.coe_piecewise, false_and] using int_f,
have : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) < ε / c := ennreal.div_pos_iff.2 ⟨ε0, ennreal.coe_ne_top⟩,
obtain ⟨F, Fs, F_closed, μF⟩ : ∃ F ⊆ s, is_closed F ∧ μ s < μ F + ε / c :=
hs.exists_is_closed_lt_add μs_lt_top.ne this.ne',
refine ⟨set.indicator F (λ x, c), λ x, _,
F_closed.upper_semicontinuous_indicator (zero_le _), _⟩,
{ simp only [simple_func.coe_const, simple_func.const_zero, simple_func.coe_zero,
set.piecewise_eq_indicator, simple_func.coe_piecewise],
exact set.indicator_le_indicator_of_subset Fs (λ x, zero_le _) _ },
{ suffices : (c : ℝ≥0∞) * μ s ≤ c * μ F + ε,
by simpa only [hs, F_closed.measurable_set, simple_func.coe_const, function.const_apply,
lintegral_const, ennreal.coe_indicator, set.univ_inter, measurable_set.univ,
simple_func.const_zero, lintegral_indicator, simple_func.coe_zero,
set.piecewise_eq_indicator, simple_func.coe_piecewise, restrict_apply],
calc (c : ℝ≥0∞) * μ s ≤ c * (μ F + ε / c) : ennreal.mul_le_mul (le_refl _) μF.le
... = c * μ F + ε :
begin
simp_rw [mul_add],
rw ennreal.mul_div_cancel' _ ennreal.coe_ne_top,
simpa using hc,
end } },
{ have A : ∫⁻ (x : α), f₁ x ∂μ + ∫⁻ (x : α), f₂ x ∂μ ≠ ⊤,
by rwa ← lintegral_add f₁.measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal f₂.measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal ,
rcases h₁ (ennreal.add_ne_top.1 A).1 (ennreal.half_pos ε0).ne'
with ⟨g₁, f₁_le_g₁, g₁cont, g₁int⟩,
rcases h₂ (ennreal.add_ne_top.1 A).2 (ennreal.half_pos ε0).ne'
with ⟨g₂, f₂_le_g₂, g₂cont, g₂int⟩,
refine ⟨λ x, g₁ x + g₂ x, λ x, add_le_add (f₁_le_g₁ x) (f₂_le_g₂ x), g₁cont.add g₂cont, _⟩,
simp only [simple_func.coe_add, ennreal.coe_add, pi.add_apply],
rw [lintegral_add f₁.measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal f₂.measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal,
lintegral_add g₁cont.measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal g₂cont.measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal],
convert add_le_add g₁int g₂int using 1,
conv_lhs { rw ← ennreal.add_halves ε },
abel }
end
/-- Given an integrable function `f` with values in `ℝ≥0`, there exists an upper semicontinuous
function `g ≤ f` with integral arbitrarily close to that of `f`. Formulation in terms of
`lintegral`.
Auxiliary lemma for Vitali-Carathéodory theorem `exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_integral_lt`. -/
lemma exists_upper_semicontinuous_le_lintegral_le
(f : α → ℝ≥0) (int_f : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (ε0 : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ g : α → ℝ≥0, (∀ x, g x ≤ f x) ∧ upper_semicontinuous g ∧ (∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ + ε) :=
begin
obtain ⟨fs, fs_le_f, int_fs⟩ : ∃ (fs : α →ₛ ℝ≥0), (∀ x, fs x ≤ f x) ∧
(∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, fs x ∂μ + ε/2) :=
begin
have := ennreal.lt_add_right int_f (ennreal.half_pos ε0).ne',
conv_rhs at this { rw lintegral_eq_nnreal (λ x, (f x : ℝ≥0∞)) μ },
erw ennreal.bsupr_add at this; [skip, exact ⟨0, λ x, by simp⟩],
simp only [lt_supr_iff] at this,
rcases this with ⟨fs, fs_le_f, int_fs⟩,
refine ⟨fs, λ x, by simpa only [ennreal.coe_le_coe] using fs_le_f x, _⟩,
convert int_fs.le,
rw ← simple_func.lintegral_eq_lintegral,
refl
end,
have int_fs_lt_top : ∫⁻ x, fs x ∂μ ≠ ∞,
{ apply ne_top_of_le_ne_top int_f (lintegral_mono (λ x, _)),
simpa only [ennreal.coe_le_coe] using fs_le_f x },
obtain ⟨g, g_le_fs, gcont, gint⟩ : ∃ g : α → ℝ≥0,
(∀ x, g x ≤ fs x) ∧ upper_semicontinuous g ∧ (∫⁻ x, fs x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ + ε/2) :=
fs.exists_upper_semicontinuous_le_lintegral_le int_fs_lt_top (ennreal.half_pos ε0).ne',
refine ⟨g, λ x, (g_le_fs x).trans (fs_le_f x), gcont, _⟩,
calc ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, fs x ∂μ + ε / 2 : int_fs
... ≤ (∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ + ε / 2) + ε / 2 : add_le_add gint (le_refl _)
... = ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ + ε : by rw [add_assoc, ennreal.add_halves]
end
/-- Given an integrable function `f` with values in `ℝ≥0`, there exists an upper semicontinuous
function `g ≤ f` with integral arbitrarily close to that of `f`. Formulation in terms of
`integral`.
Auxiliary lemma for Vitali-Carathéodory theorem `exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_integral_lt`. -/
lemma exists_upper_semicontinuous_le_integral_le (f : α → ℝ≥0)
(fint : integrable (λ x, (f x : ℝ)) μ) {ε : ℝ} (εpos : 0 < ε) :
∃ g : α → ℝ≥0, (∀ x, g x ≤ f x) ∧ upper_semicontinuous g ∧ (integrable (λ x, (g x : ℝ)) μ)
∧ (∫ x, (f x : ℝ) ∂μ - ε ≤ ∫ x, g x ∂μ) :=
begin
lift ε to ℝ≥0 using εpos.le,
rw [nnreal.coe_pos, ← ennreal.coe_pos] at εpos,
have If : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂ μ < ∞ := has_finite_integral_iff_of_nnreal.1 fint.has_finite_integral,
rcases exists_upper_semicontinuous_le_lintegral_le f If.ne εpos.ne' with ⟨g, gf, gcont, gint⟩,
have Ig : ∫⁻ x, g x ∂ μ < ∞,
{ apply lt_of_le_of_lt (lintegral_mono (λ x, _)) If,
simpa using gf x },
refine ⟨g, gf, gcont, _, _⟩,
{ refine integrable.mono fint gcont.measurable.coe_nnreal_real.ae_measurable _,
exact filter.eventually_of_forall (λ x, by simp [gf x]) },
{ rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae, integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae],
{ rw sub_le_iff_le_add,
convert ennreal.to_real_mono _ gint,
{ simp, },
{ rw ennreal.to_real_add Ig.ne ennreal.coe_ne_top, simp },
{ simpa using Ig.ne } },
{ apply filter.eventually_of_forall, simp },
{ exact gcont.measurable.coe_nnreal_real.ae_measurable },
{ apply filter.eventually_of_forall, simp },
{ exact fint.ae_measurable } }
end
/-! ### Vitali-Carathéodory theorem -/
/-- **Vitali-Carathéodory Theorem**: given an integrable real function `f`, there exists an
integrable function `g > f` which is lower semicontinuous, with integral arbitrarily close
to that of `f`. This function has to be `ereal`-valued in general. -/
lemma exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_integral_lt [sigma_finite μ]
(f : α → ℝ) (hf : integrable f μ) {ε : ℝ} (εpos : 0 < ε) :
∃ g : α → ereal, (∀ x, (f x : ereal) < g x) ∧ lower_semicontinuous g ∧
(integrable (λ x, ereal.to_real (g x)) μ) ∧ (∀ᵐ x ∂ μ, g x < ⊤) ∧
(∫ x, ereal.to_real (g x) ∂μ < ∫ x, f x ∂μ + ε) :=
begin
let δ : ℝ≥0 := ⟨ε/2, (half_pos εpos).le⟩,
have δpos : 0 < δ := half_pos εpos,
let fp : α → ℝ≥0 := λ x, real.to_nnreal (f x),
have int_fp : integrable (λ x, (fp x : ℝ)) μ := hf.real_to_nnreal,
rcases exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_integral_gt_nnreal fp int_fp δpos
with ⟨gp, fp_lt_gp, gpcont, gp_lt_top, gp_integrable, gpint⟩,
let fm : α → ℝ≥0 := λ x, real.to_nnreal (-f x),
have int_fm : integrable (λ x, (fm x : ℝ)) μ := hf.neg.real_to_nnreal,
rcases exists_upper_semicontinuous_le_integral_le fm int_fm δpos
with ⟨gm, gm_le_fm, gmcont, gm_integrable, gmint⟩,
let g : α → ereal := λ x, (gp x : ereal) - (gm x),
have ae_g : ∀ᵐ x ∂ μ, (g x).to_real = (gp x : ereal).to_real - (gm x : ereal).to_real,
{ filter_upwards [gp_lt_top],
assume x hx,
rw ereal.to_real_sub;
simp [hx.ne] },
refine ⟨g, _, _, _, _, _⟩,
show integrable (λ x, ereal.to_real (g x)) μ,
{ rw integrable_congr ae_g,
convert gp_integrable.sub gm_integrable,
ext x,
simp },
show ∫ (x : α), (g x).to_real ∂μ < ∫ (x : α), f x ∂μ + ε, from calc
∫ (x : α), (g x).to_real ∂μ = ∫ (x : α), ereal.to_real (gp x) - ereal.to_real (gm x) ∂μ :
integral_congr_ae ae_g
... = ∫ (x : α), ereal.to_real (gp x) ∂ μ - ∫ (x : α), gm x ∂μ :
begin
simp only [ereal.to_real_coe_ennreal, ennreal.coe_to_real, coe_coe],
exact integral_sub gp_integrable gm_integrable,
end
... < ∫ (x : α), ↑(fp x) ∂μ + ↑δ - ∫ (x : α), gm x ∂μ :
begin
apply sub_lt_sub_right,
convert gpint,
simp only [ereal.to_real_coe_ennreal],
end
... ≤ ∫ (x : α), ↑(fp x) ∂μ + ↑δ - (∫ (x : α), fm x ∂μ - δ) :
sub_le_sub_left gmint _
... = ∫ (x : α), f x ∂μ + 2 * δ :
by { simp_rw [integral_eq_integral_pos_part_sub_integral_neg_part hf, fp, fm], ring }
... = ∫ (x : α), f x ∂μ + ε :
by { congr' 1, field_simp [δ, mul_comm] },
show ∀ᵐ (x : α) ∂μ, g x < ⊤,
{ filter_upwards [gp_lt_top],
assume x hx,
simp [g, ereal.sub_eq_add_neg, lt_top_iff_ne_top, lt_top_iff_ne_top.1 hx] },
show ∀ x, (f x : ereal) < g x,
{ assume x,
rw ereal.coe_real_ereal_eq_coe_to_nnreal_sub_coe_to_nnreal (f x),
refine ereal.sub_lt_sub_of_lt_of_le _ _ _ _,
{ simp only [ereal.coe_ennreal_lt_coe_ennreal_iff, coe_coe], exact (fp_lt_gp x) },
{ simp only [ennreal.coe_le_coe, ereal.coe_ennreal_le_coe_ennreal_iff, coe_coe],
exact (gm_le_fm x) },
{ simp only [ereal.coe_ennreal_ne_bot, ne.def, not_false_iff, coe_coe] },
{ simp only [ereal.coe_nnreal_ne_top, ne.def, not_false_iff, coe_coe] } },
show lower_semicontinuous g,
{ apply lower_semicontinuous.add',
{ exact continuous_coe_ennreal_ereal.comp_lower_semicontinuous gpcont
(λ x y hxy, ereal.coe_ennreal_le_coe_ennreal_iff.2 hxy) },
{ apply ereal.continuous_neg.comp_upper_semicontinuous_antitone _
(λ x y hxy, ereal.neg_le_neg_iff.2 hxy),
dsimp,
apply continuous_coe_ennreal_ereal.comp_upper_semicontinuous _
(λ x y hxy, ereal.coe_ennreal_le_coe_ennreal_iff.2 hxy),
exact ennreal.continuous_coe.comp_upper_semicontinuous gmcont
(λ x y hxy, ennreal.coe_le_coe.2 hxy) },
{ assume x,
exact ereal.continuous_at_add (by simp) (by simp) } }
end
/-- **Vitali-Carathéodory Theorem**: given an integrable real function `f`, there exists an
integrable function `g < f` which is upper semicontinuous, with integral arbitrarily close to that
of `f`. This function has to be `ereal`-valued in general. -/
lemma exists_upper_semicontinuous_lt_integral_gt [sigma_finite μ]
(f : α → ℝ) (hf : integrable f μ) {ε : ℝ} (εpos : 0 < ε) :
∃ g : α → ereal, (∀ x, (g x : ereal) < f x) ∧ upper_semicontinuous g ∧
(integrable (λ x, ereal.to_real (g x)) μ) ∧ (∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ⊥ < g x) ∧
(∫ x, f x ∂μ < ∫ x, ereal.to_real (g x) ∂μ + ε) :=
begin
rcases exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_integral_lt (λ x, - f x) hf.neg εpos
with ⟨g, g_lt_f, gcont, g_integrable, g_lt_top, gint⟩,
refine ⟨λ x, - g x, _, _, _, _, _⟩,
{ exact λ x, ereal.neg_lt_iff_neg_lt.1 (by simpa only [ereal.coe_neg] using g_lt_f x) },
{ exact ereal.continuous_neg.comp_lower_semicontinuous_antitone gcont
(λ x y hxy, ereal.neg_le_neg_iff.2 hxy) },
{ convert g_integrable.neg,
ext x,
simp },
{ simpa [bot_lt_iff_ne_bot, lt_top_iff_ne_top] using g_lt_top },
{ simp_rw [integral_neg, lt_neg_add_iff_add_lt] at gint,
rw add_comm at gint,
simpa [integral_neg] using gint }
end
end measure_theory
|
af80676e8bce34dba03f127ed947d1cffdd551ae | 437dc96105f48409c3981d46fb48e57c9ac3a3e4 | /src/analysis/special_functions/trigonometric.lean | 6178b4b64cbbc1f0423a53bf3e3d0845c1623a94 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dan-c-k/mathlib | 08efec79bd7481ee6da9cc44c24a653bff4fbe0d | 96efc220f6225bc7a5ed8349900391a33a38cc56 | refs/heads/master | 1,658,082,847,093 | 1,589,013,201,000 | 1,589,013,201,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 65,903 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne
-/
import analysis.special_functions.exp_log
/-!
# Trigonometric functions
## Main definitions
This file contains the following definitions:
* π, arcsin, arccos, arctan
* argument of a complex number
* logarithm on complex numbers
## Main statements
Many basic inequalities on trigonometric functions are established.
The continuity and differentiability of the usual trigonometric functions are proved, and their
derivatives are computed.
## Tags
log, sin, cos, tan, arcsin, arccos, arctan, angle, argument
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical
namespace complex
/-- The complex sine function is everywhere differentiable, with the derivative `cos x`. -/
lemma has_deriv_at_sin (x : ℂ) : has_deriv_at sin (cos x) x :=
begin
simp only [cos, div_eq_mul_inv],
convert ((((has_deriv_at_id x).neg.mul_const I).cexp.sub
((has_deriv_at_id x).mul_const I).cexp).mul_const I).mul_const (2:ℂ)⁻¹,
simp only [function.comp, id],
rw [sub_mul, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, I_mul_I, neg_one_mul, neg_neg, mul_one, one_mul, mul_assoc,
I_mul_I, mul_neg_one, sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm]
end
lemma differentiable_sin : differentiable ℂ sin :=
λx, (has_deriv_at_sin x).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_at_sin {x : ℂ} : differentiable_at ℂ sin x :=
differentiable_sin x
@[simp] lemma deriv_sin : deriv sin = cos :=
funext $ λ x, (has_deriv_at_sin x).deriv
lemma continuous_sin : continuous sin :=
differentiable_sin.continuous
/-- The complex cosine function is everywhere differentiable, with the derivative `-sin x`. -/
lemma has_deriv_at_cos (x : ℂ) : has_deriv_at cos (-sin x) x :=
begin
simp only [sin, div_eq_mul_inv, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul],
convert (((has_deriv_at_id x).mul_const I).cexp.add
((has_deriv_at_id x).neg.mul_const I).cexp).mul_const (2:ℂ)⁻¹,
simp only [function.comp, id],
ring
end
lemma differentiable_cos : differentiable ℂ cos :=
λx, (has_deriv_at_cos x).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_at_cos {x : ℂ} : differentiable_at ℂ cos x :=
differentiable_cos x
lemma deriv_cos {x : ℂ} : deriv cos x = -sin x :=
(has_deriv_at_cos x).deriv
@[simp] lemma deriv_cos' : deriv cos = (λ x, -sin x) :=
funext $ λ x, deriv_cos
lemma continuous_cos : continuous cos :=
differentiable_cos.continuous
lemma continuous_tan : continuous (λ x : {x // cos x ≠ 0}, tan x) :=
(continuous_sin.comp continuous_subtype_val).mul
(continuous.inv subtype.property (continuous_cos.comp continuous_subtype_val))
/-- The complex hyperbolic sine function is everywhere differentiable, with the derivative `sinh x`. -/
lemma has_deriv_at_sinh (x : ℂ) : has_deriv_at sinh (cosh x) x :=
begin
simp only [cosh, div_eq_mul_inv],
convert ((has_deriv_at_exp x).sub (has_deriv_at_id x).neg.cexp).mul_const (2:ℂ)⁻¹,
rw [id, mul_neg_one, neg_neg]
end
lemma differentiable_sinh : differentiable ℂ sinh :=
λx, (has_deriv_at_sinh x).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_at_sinh {x : ℂ} : differentiable_at ℂ sinh x :=
differentiable_sinh x
@[simp] lemma deriv_sinh : deriv sinh = cosh :=
funext $ λ x, (has_deriv_at_sinh x).deriv
lemma continuous_sinh : continuous sinh :=
differentiable_sinh.continuous
/-- The complex hyperbolic cosine function is everywhere differentiable, with the derivative `cosh x`. -/
lemma has_deriv_at_cosh (x : ℂ) : has_deriv_at cosh (sinh x) x :=
begin
simp only [sinh, div_eq_mul_inv],
convert ((has_deriv_at_exp x).add (has_deriv_at_id x).neg.cexp).mul_const (2:ℂ)⁻¹,
rw [id, mul_neg_one, sub_eq_add_neg]
end
lemma differentiable_cosh : differentiable ℂ cosh :=
λx, (has_deriv_at_cosh x).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_at_cosh {x : ℂ} : differentiable_at ℂ cos x :=
differentiable_cos x
@[simp] lemma deriv_cosh : deriv cosh = sinh :=
funext $ λ x, (has_deriv_at_cosh x).deriv
lemma continuous_cosh : continuous cosh :=
differentiable_cosh.continuous
end complex
section
/-! Register lemmas for the derivatives of the composition of `complex.cos`, `complex.sin`,
`complex.cosh` and `complex.sinh` with a differentiable function, for standalone use and use with
`simp`. -/
variables {f : ℂ → ℂ} {f' x : ℂ} {s : set ℂ}
/-! `complex.cos`-/
lemma has_deriv_at.ccos (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, complex.cos (f x)) (- complex.sin (f x) * f') x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_cos (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_within_at.ccos (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, complex.cos (f x)) (- complex.sin (f x) * f') s x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_cos (f x)).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hf
lemma differentiable_within_at.ccos (hf : differentiable_within_at ℂ f s x) :
differentiable_within_at ℂ (λ x, complex.cos (f x)) s x :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.ccos.differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.ccos (hc : differentiable_at ℂ f x) :
differentiable_at ℂ (λx, complex.cos (f x)) x :=
hc.has_deriv_at.ccos.differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.ccos (hc : differentiable_on ℂ f s) :
differentiable_on ℂ (λx, complex.cos (f x)) s :=
λx h, (hc x h).ccos
@[simp] lemma differentiable.ccos (hc : differentiable ℂ f) :
differentiable ℂ (λx, complex.cos (f x)) :=
λx, (hc x).ccos
lemma deriv_within_ccos (hf : differentiable_within_at ℂ f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℂ s x) :
deriv_within (λx, complex.cos (f x)) s x = - complex.sin (f x) * (deriv_within f s x) :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.ccos.deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_ccos (hc : differentiable_at ℂ f x) :
deriv (λx, complex.cos (f x)) x = - complex.sin (f x) * (deriv f x) :=
hc.has_deriv_at.ccos.deriv
/-! `complex.sin`-/
lemma has_deriv_at.csin (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, complex.sin (f x)) (complex.cos (f x) * f') x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_sin (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_within_at.csin (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, complex.sin (f x)) (complex.cos (f x) * f') s x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_sin (f x)).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hf
lemma differentiable_within_at.csin (hf : differentiable_within_at ℂ f s x) :
differentiable_within_at ℂ (λ x, complex.sin (f x)) s x :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.csin.differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.csin (hc : differentiable_at ℂ f x) :
differentiable_at ℂ (λx, complex.sin (f x)) x :=
hc.has_deriv_at.csin.differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.csin (hc : differentiable_on ℂ f s) :
differentiable_on ℂ (λx, complex.sin (f x)) s :=
λx h, (hc x h).csin
@[simp] lemma differentiable.csin (hc : differentiable ℂ f) :
differentiable ℂ (λx, complex.sin (f x)) :=
λx, (hc x).csin
lemma deriv_within_csin (hf : differentiable_within_at ℂ f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℂ s x) :
deriv_within (λx, complex.sin (f x)) s x = complex.cos (f x) * (deriv_within f s x) :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.csin.deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_csin (hc : differentiable_at ℂ f x) :
deriv (λx, complex.sin (f x)) x = complex.cos (f x) * (deriv f x) :=
hc.has_deriv_at.csin.deriv
/-! `complex.cosh`-/
lemma has_deriv_at.ccosh (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, complex.cosh (f x)) (complex.sinh (f x) * f') x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_cosh (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_within_at.ccosh (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, complex.cosh (f x)) (complex.sinh (f x) * f') s x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_cosh (f x)).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hf
lemma differentiable_within_at.ccosh (hf : differentiable_within_at ℂ f s x) :
differentiable_within_at ℂ (λ x, complex.cosh (f x)) s x :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.ccosh.differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.ccosh (hc : differentiable_at ℂ f x) :
differentiable_at ℂ (λx, complex.cosh (f x)) x :=
hc.has_deriv_at.ccosh.differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.ccosh (hc : differentiable_on ℂ f s) :
differentiable_on ℂ (λx, complex.cosh (f x)) s :=
λx h, (hc x h).ccosh
@[simp] lemma differentiable.ccosh (hc : differentiable ℂ f) :
differentiable ℂ (λx, complex.cosh (f x)) :=
λx, (hc x).ccosh
lemma deriv_within_ccosh (hf : differentiable_within_at ℂ f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℂ s x) :
deriv_within (λx, complex.cosh (f x)) s x = complex.sinh (f x) * (deriv_within f s x) :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.ccosh.deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_ccosh (hc : differentiable_at ℂ f x) :
deriv (λx, complex.cosh (f x)) x = complex.sinh (f x) * (deriv f x) :=
hc.has_deriv_at.ccosh.deriv
/-! `complex.sinh`-/
lemma has_deriv_at.csinh (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, complex.sinh (f x)) (complex.cosh (f x) * f') x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_sinh (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_within_at.csinh (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, complex.sinh (f x)) (complex.cosh (f x) * f') s x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_sinh (f x)).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hf
lemma differentiable_within_at.csinh (hf : differentiable_within_at ℂ f s x) :
differentiable_within_at ℂ (λ x, complex.sinh (f x)) s x :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.csinh.differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.csinh (hc : differentiable_at ℂ f x) :
differentiable_at ℂ (λx, complex.sinh (f x)) x :=
hc.has_deriv_at.csinh.differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.csinh (hc : differentiable_on ℂ f s) :
differentiable_on ℂ (λx, complex.sinh (f x)) s :=
λx h, (hc x h).csinh
@[simp] lemma differentiable.csinh (hc : differentiable ℂ f) :
differentiable ℂ (λx, complex.sinh (f x)) :=
λx, (hc x).csinh
lemma deriv_within_csinh (hf : differentiable_within_at ℂ f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℂ s x) :
deriv_within (λx, complex.sinh (f x)) s x = complex.cosh (f x) * (deriv_within f s x) :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.csinh.deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_csinh (hc : differentiable_at ℂ f x) :
deriv (λx, complex.sinh (f x)) x = complex.cosh (f x) * (deriv f x) :=
hc.has_deriv_at.csinh.deriv
end
namespace real
variables {x y z : ℝ}
lemma has_deriv_at_sin (x : ℝ) : has_deriv_at sin (cos x) x :=
has_deriv_at_real_of_complex (complex.has_deriv_at_sin x)
lemma differentiable_sin : differentiable ℝ sin :=
λx, (has_deriv_at_sin x).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_at_sin : differentiable_at ℝ sin x :=
differentiable_sin x
@[simp] lemma deriv_sin : deriv sin = cos :=
funext $ λ x, (has_deriv_at_sin x).deriv
lemma continuous_sin : continuous sin :=
differentiable_sin.continuous
lemma has_deriv_at_cos (x : ℝ) : has_deriv_at cos (-sin x) x :=
(has_deriv_at_real_of_complex (complex.has_deriv_at_cos x) : _)
lemma differentiable_cos : differentiable ℝ cos :=
λx, (has_deriv_at_cos x).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_at_cos : differentiable_at ℝ cos x :=
differentiable_cos x
lemma deriv_cos : deriv cos x = - sin x :=
(has_deriv_at_cos x).deriv
@[simp] lemma deriv_cos' : deriv cos = (λ x, - sin x) :=
funext $ λ _, deriv_cos
lemma continuous_cos : continuous cos :=
differentiable_cos.continuous
lemma continuous_tan : continuous (λ x : {x // cos x ≠ 0}, tan x) :=
by simp only [tan_eq_sin_div_cos]; exact
(continuous_sin.comp continuous_subtype_val).mul
(continuous.inv subtype.property
(continuous_cos.comp continuous_subtype_val))
lemma has_deriv_at_sinh (x : ℝ) : has_deriv_at sinh (cosh x) x :=
has_deriv_at_real_of_complex (complex.has_deriv_at_sinh x)
lemma differentiable_sinh : differentiable ℝ sinh :=
λx, (has_deriv_at_sinh x).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_at_sinh : differentiable_at ℝ sinh x :=
differentiable_sinh x
@[simp] lemma deriv_sinh : deriv sinh = cosh :=
funext $ λ x, (has_deriv_at_sinh x).deriv
lemma continuous_sinh : continuous sinh :=
differentiable_sinh.continuous
lemma has_deriv_at_cosh (x : ℝ) : has_deriv_at cosh (sinh x) x :=
has_deriv_at_real_of_complex (complex.has_deriv_at_cosh x)
lemma differentiable_cosh : differentiable ℝ cosh :=
λx, (has_deriv_at_cosh x).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_at_cosh : differentiable_at ℝ cosh x :=
differentiable_cosh x
@[simp] lemma deriv_cosh : deriv cosh = sinh :=
funext $ λ x, (has_deriv_at_cosh x).deriv
lemma continuous_cosh : continuous cosh :=
differentiable_cosh.continuous
end real
section
/-! Register lemmas for the derivatives of the composition of `real.exp`, `real.cos`, `real.sin`,
`real.cosh` and `real.sinh` with a differentiable function, for standalone use and use with
`simp`. -/
variables {f : ℝ → ℝ} {f' x : ℝ} {s : set ℝ}
/-! `real.cos`-/
lemma has_deriv_at.cos (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, real.cos (f x)) (- real.sin (f x) * f') x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_cos (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_within_at.cos (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, real.cos (f x)) (- real.sin (f x) * f') s x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_cos (f x)).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hf
lemma differentiable_within_at.cos (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x) :
differentiable_within_at ℝ (λ x, real.cos (f x)) s x :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.cos.differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.cos (hc : differentiable_at ℝ f x) :
differentiable_at ℝ (λx, real.cos (f x)) x :=
hc.has_deriv_at.cos.differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.cos (hc : differentiable_on ℝ f s) :
differentiable_on ℝ (λx, real.cos (f x)) s :=
λx h, (hc x h).cos
@[simp] lemma differentiable.cos (hc : differentiable ℝ f) :
differentiable ℝ (λx, real.cos (f x)) :=
λx, (hc x).cos
lemma deriv_within_cos (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℝ s x) :
deriv_within (λx, real.cos (f x)) s x = - real.sin (f x) * (deriv_within f s x) :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.cos.deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_cos (hc : differentiable_at ℝ f x) :
deriv (λx, real.cos (f x)) x = - real.sin (f x) * (deriv f x) :=
hc.has_deriv_at.cos.deriv
/-! `real.sin`-/
lemma has_deriv_at.sin (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, real.sin (f x)) (real.cos (f x) * f') x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_sin (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_within_at.sin (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, real.sin (f x)) (real.cos (f x) * f') s x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_sin (f x)).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hf
lemma differentiable_within_at.sin (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x) :
differentiable_within_at ℝ (λ x, real.sin (f x)) s x :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.sin.differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.sin (hc : differentiable_at ℝ f x) :
differentiable_at ℝ (λx, real.sin (f x)) x :=
hc.has_deriv_at.sin.differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.sin (hc : differentiable_on ℝ f s) :
differentiable_on ℝ (λx, real.sin (f x)) s :=
λx h, (hc x h).sin
@[simp] lemma differentiable.sin (hc : differentiable ℝ f) :
differentiable ℝ (λx, real.sin (f x)) :=
λx, (hc x).sin
lemma deriv_within_sin (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℝ s x) :
deriv_within (λx, real.sin (f x)) s x = real.cos (f x) * (deriv_within f s x) :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.sin.deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_sin (hc : differentiable_at ℝ f x) :
deriv (λx, real.sin (f x)) x = real.cos (f x) * (deriv f x) :=
hc.has_deriv_at.sin.deriv
/-! `real.cosh`-/
lemma has_deriv_at.cosh (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, real.cosh (f x)) (real.sinh (f x) * f') x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_cosh (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_within_at.cosh (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, real.cosh (f x)) (real.sinh (f x) * f') s x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_cosh (f x)).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hf
lemma differentiable_within_at.cosh (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x) :
differentiable_within_at ℝ (λ x, real.cosh (f x)) s x :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.cosh.differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.cosh (hc : differentiable_at ℝ f x) :
differentiable_at ℝ (λx, real.cosh (f x)) x :=
hc.has_deriv_at.cosh.differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.cosh (hc : differentiable_on ℝ f s) :
differentiable_on ℝ (λx, real.cosh (f x)) s :=
λx h, (hc x h).cosh
@[simp] lemma differentiable.cosh (hc : differentiable ℝ f) :
differentiable ℝ (λx, real.cosh (f x)) :=
λx, (hc x).cosh
lemma deriv_within_cosh (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℝ s x) :
deriv_within (λx, real.cosh (f x)) s x = real.sinh (f x) * (deriv_within f s x) :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.cosh.deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_cosh (hc : differentiable_at ℝ f x) :
deriv (λx, real.cosh (f x)) x = real.sinh (f x) * (deriv f x) :=
hc.has_deriv_at.cosh.deriv
/-! `real.sinh`-/
lemma has_deriv_at.sinh (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, real.sinh (f x)) (real.cosh (f x) * f') x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_sinh (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_within_at.sinh (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, real.sinh (f x)) (real.cosh (f x) * f') s x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_sinh (f x)).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hf
lemma differentiable_within_at.sinh (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x) :
differentiable_within_at ℝ (λ x, real.sinh (f x)) s x :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.sinh.differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.sinh (hc : differentiable_at ℝ f x) :
differentiable_at ℝ (λx, real.sinh (f x)) x :=
hc.has_deriv_at.sinh.differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.sinh (hc : differentiable_on ℝ f s) :
differentiable_on ℝ (λx, real.sinh (f x)) s :=
λx h, (hc x h).sinh
@[simp] lemma differentiable.sinh (hc : differentiable ℝ f) :
differentiable ℝ (λx, real.sinh (f x)) :=
λx, (hc x).sinh
lemma deriv_within_sinh (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℝ s x) :
deriv_within (λx, real.sinh (f x)) s x = real.cosh (f x) * (deriv_within f s x) :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.sinh.deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_sinh (hc : differentiable_at ℝ f x) :
deriv (λx, real.sinh (f x)) x = real.cosh (f x) * (deriv f x) :=
hc.has_deriv_at.sinh.deriv
end
namespace real
lemma exists_cos_eq_zero : 0 ∈ cos '' set.Icc (1:ℝ) 2 :=
intermediate_value_Icc' (by norm_num) continuous_cos.continuous_on
⟨le_of_lt cos_two_neg, le_of_lt cos_one_pos⟩
/-- The number π = 3.14159265... Defined here using choice as twice a zero of cos in [1,2], from
which one can derive all its properties. For explicit bounds on π, see `data.real.pi`. -/
noncomputable def pi : ℝ := 2 * classical.some exists_cos_eq_zero
localized "notation `π` := real.pi" in real
@[simp] lemma cos_pi_div_two : cos (π / 2) = 0 :=
by rw [pi, mul_div_cancel_left _ (@two_ne_zero' ℝ _ _ _)];
exact (classical.some_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).2
lemma one_le_pi_div_two : (1 : ℝ) ≤ π / 2 :=
by rw [pi, mul_div_cancel_left _ (@two_ne_zero' ℝ _ _ _)];
exact (classical.some_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).1.1
lemma pi_div_two_le_two : π / 2 ≤ 2 :=
by rw [pi, mul_div_cancel_left _ (@two_ne_zero' ℝ _ _ _)];
exact (classical.some_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).1.2
lemma two_le_pi : (2 : ℝ) ≤ π :=
(div_le_div_right (show (0 : ℝ) < 2, by norm_num)).1
(by rw div_self (@two_ne_zero' ℝ _ _ _); exact one_le_pi_div_two)
lemma pi_le_four : π ≤ 4 :=
(div_le_div_right (show (0 : ℝ) < 2, by norm_num)).1
(calc π / 2 ≤ 2 : pi_div_two_le_two
... = 4 / 2 : by norm_num)
lemma pi_pos : 0 < π :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (by norm_num) two_le_pi
lemma pi_div_two_pos : 0 < π / 2 :=
half_pos pi_pos
lemma two_pi_pos : 0 < 2 * π :=
by linarith [pi_pos]
@[simp] lemma sin_pi : sin π = 0 :=
by rw [← mul_div_cancel_left pi (@two_ne_zero ℝ _), two_mul, add_div,
sin_add, cos_pi_div_two]; simp
@[simp] lemma cos_pi : cos π = -1 :=
by rw [← mul_div_cancel_left pi (@two_ne_zero ℝ _), mul_div_assoc,
cos_two_mul, cos_pi_div_two];
simp [bit0, pow_add]
@[simp] lemma sin_two_pi : sin (2 * π) = 0 :=
by simp [two_mul, sin_add]
@[simp] lemma cos_two_pi : cos (2 * π) = 1 :=
by simp [two_mul, cos_add]
lemma sin_add_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π) = -sin x :=
by simp [sin_add]
lemma sin_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + 2 * π) = sin x :=
by simp [sin_add_pi, sin_add, sin_two_pi, cos_two_pi]
lemma cos_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + 2 * π) = cos x :=
by simp [cos_add, cos_two_pi, sin_two_pi]
lemma sin_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (π - x) = sin x :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
lemma cos_add_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + π) = -cos x :=
by simp [cos_add]
lemma cos_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (π - x) = -cos x :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, cos_add]
lemma sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 < x) (hxp : x < π) : 0 < sin x :=
if hx2 : x ≤ 2 then sin_pos_of_pos_of_le_two h0x hx2
else
have (2 : ℝ) + 2 = 4, from rfl,
have π - x ≤ 2, from sub_le_iff_le_add.2
(le_trans pi_le_four (this ▸ add_le_add_left (le_of_not_ge hx2) _)),
sin_pi_sub x ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_le_two (sub_pos.2 hxp) this
lemma sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 ≤ x) (hxp : x ≤ π) : 0 ≤ sin x :=
match lt_or_eq_of_le h0x with
| or.inl h0x := (lt_or_eq_of_le hxp).elim
(le_of_lt ∘ sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h0x)
(λ hpx, by simp [hpx])
| or.inr h0x := by simp [h0x.symm]
end
lemma sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x < 0) (hpx : -π < x) : sin x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 $ sin_neg x ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi (neg_pos.2 hx0) (neg_lt.1 hpx)
lemma sin_nonpos_of_nonnpos_of_neg_pi_le {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x ≤ 0) (hpx : -π ≤ x) : sin x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 $ sin_neg x ▸ sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi (neg_nonneg.2 hx0) (neg_le.1 hpx)
@[simp] lemma sin_pi_div_two : sin (π / 2) = 1 :=
have sin (π / 2) = 1 ∨ sin (π / 2) = -1 :=
by simpa [pow_two, mul_self_eq_one_iff] using sin_sq_add_cos_sq (π / 2),
this.resolve_right
(λ h, (show ¬(0 : ℝ) < -1, by norm_num) $
h ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi pi_div_two_pos (half_lt_self pi_pos))
lemma sin_add_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π / 2) = cos x :=
by simp [sin_add]
lemma sin_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : sin (x - π / 2) = -cos x :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
lemma sin_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (π / 2 - x) = cos x :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
lemma cos_add_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : cos (x + π / 2) = -sin x :=
by simp [cos_add]
lemma cos_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : cos (x - π / 2) = sin x :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, cos_add]
lemma cos_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (π / 2 - x) = sin x :=
by rw [← cos_neg, neg_sub, cos_sub_pi_div_two]
lemma cos_pos_of_neg_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two
{x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) < x) (hx₂ : x < π / 2) : 0 < cos x :=
sin_add_pi_div_two x ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi (by linarith) (by linarith)
lemma cos_nonneg_of_neg_pi_div_two_le_of_le_pi_div_two
{x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π / 2) : 0 ≤ cos x :=
match lt_or_eq_of_le hx₁, lt_or_eq_of_le hx₂ with
| or.inl hx₁, or.inl hx₂ := le_of_lt (cos_pos_of_neg_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two hx₁ hx₂)
| or.inl hx₁, or.inr hx₂ := by simp [hx₂]
| or.inr hx₁, _ := by simp [hx₁.symm]
end
lemma cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : π / 2 < x) (hx₂ : x < π + π / 2) : cos x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 $ cos_pi_sub x ▸
cos_pos_of_neg_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two (by linarith) (by linarith)
lemma cos_nonpos_of_pi_div_two_le_of_le {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : π / 2 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π + π / 2) : cos x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 $ cos_pi_sub x ▸
cos_nonneg_of_neg_pi_div_two_le_of_le_pi_div_two (by linarith) (by linarith)
lemma sin_nat_mul_pi (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
by induction n; simp [add_mul, sin_add, *]
lemma sin_int_mul_pi (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
by cases n; simp [add_mul, sin_add, *, sin_nat_mul_pi]
lemma cos_nat_mul_two_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
by induction n; simp [*, mul_add, cos_add, add_mul, cos_two_pi, sin_two_pi]
lemma cos_int_mul_two_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
by cases n; simp only [cos_nat_mul_two_pi, int.of_nat_eq_coe,
int.neg_succ_of_nat_coe, int.cast_coe_nat, int.cast_neg,
(neg_mul_eq_neg_mul _ _).symm, cos_neg]
lemma cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) + π) = -1 :=
by simp [cos_add, sin_add, cos_int_mul_two_pi]
lemma sin_eq_zero_iff_of_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -π < x) (hx₂ : x < π) :
sin x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨λ h, le_antisymm
(le_of_not_gt (λ h0, lt_irrefl (0 : ℝ) $
calc 0 < sin x : sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h0 hx₂
... = 0 : h))
(le_of_not_gt (λ h0, lt_irrefl (0 : ℝ) $
calc 0 = sin x : h.symm
... < 0 : sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h0 hx₁)),
λ h, by simp [h]⟩
lemma sin_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : sin x = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * π = x :=
⟨λ h, ⟨⌊x / π⌋, le_antisymm (sub_nonneg.1 (sub_floor_div_mul_nonneg _ pi_pos))
(sub_nonpos.1 $ le_of_not_gt $ λ h₃, ne_of_lt (sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h₃ (sub_floor_div_mul_lt _ pi_pos))
(by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add, h, sin_int_mul_pi]))⟩,
λ ⟨n, hn⟩, hn ▸ sin_int_mul_pi _⟩
lemma sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq {x : ℝ} : sin x = 0 ↔ cos x = 1 ∨ cos x = -1 :=
by rw [← mul_self_eq_one_iff (cos x), ← sin_sq_add_cos_sq x,
pow_two, pow_two, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add, sub_self];
exact ⟨λ h, by rw [h, mul_zero], eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero ∘ eq.symm⟩
theorem sin_sub_sin (θ ψ : ℝ) : sin θ - sin ψ = 2 * sin((θ - ψ)/2) * cos((θ + ψ)/2) :=
begin
have s1 := sin_add ((θ + ψ) / 2) ((θ - ψ) / 2),
have s2 := sin_sub ((θ + ψ) / 2) ((θ - ψ) / 2),
rw [div_add_div_same, add_sub, add_right_comm, add_sub_cancel, add_self_div_two] at s1,
rw [div_sub_div_same, ←sub_add, add_sub_cancel', add_self_div_two] at s2,
rw [s1, s2, ←sub_add, add_sub_cancel', ← two_mul, ← mul_assoc, mul_right_comm]
end
lemma cos_eq_one_iff (x : ℝ) : cos x = 1 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * (2 * π) = x :=
⟨λ h, let ⟨n, hn⟩ := sin_eq_zero_iff.1 (sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq.2 (or.inl h)) in
⟨n / 2, (int.mod_two_eq_zero_or_one n).elim
(λ hn0, by rwa [← mul_assoc, ← @int.cast_two ℝ, ← int.cast_mul, int.div_mul_cancel
((int.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero _ _).2 hn0)])
(λ hn1, by rw [← int.mod_add_div n 2, hn1, int.cast_add, int.cast_one, add_mul,
one_mul, add_comm, mul_comm (2 : ℤ), int.cast_mul, mul_assoc, int.cast_two] at hn;
rw [← hn, cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi] at h;
exact absurd h (by norm_num))⟩,
λ ⟨n, hn⟩, hn ▸ cos_int_mul_two_pi _⟩
theorem cos_eq_zero_iff {θ : ℝ} : cos θ = 0 ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ = (2 * k + 1) * pi / 2 :=
begin
rw [←real.sin_pi_div_two_sub, sin_eq_zero_iff],
split,
{ rintro ⟨n, hn⟩, existsi -n,
rw [int.cast_neg, add_mul, add_div, mul_assoc, mul_div_cancel_left _ (@two_ne_zero ℝ _),
one_mul, ←neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, hn, neg_sub, sub_add_cancel] },
{ rintro ⟨n, hn⟩, existsi -n,
rw [hn, add_mul, one_mul, add_div, mul_assoc, mul_div_cancel_left _ (@two_ne_zero ℝ _),
sub_add_eq_sub_sub_swap, sub_self, zero_sub, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, int.cast_neg] }
end
lemma cos_eq_one_iff_of_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(2 * π) < x) (hx₂ : x < 2 * π) : cos x = 1 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨λ h, let ⟨n, hn⟩ := (cos_eq_one_iff x).1 h in
begin
clear _let_match,
subst hn,
rw [mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left two_pi_pos, ← int.cast_one, int.cast_lt, ← int.le_sub_one_iff, sub_self] at hx₂,
rw [neg_lt, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left two_pi_pos, neg_lt,
← int.cast_one, ← int.cast_neg, int.cast_lt, ← int.add_one_le_iff, neg_add_self] at hx₁,
exact mul_eq_zero.2 (or.inl (int.cast_eq_zero.2 (le_antisymm hx₂ hx₁))),
end,
λ h, by simp [h]⟩
theorem cos_sub_cos (θ ψ : ℝ) : cos θ - cos ψ = -2 * sin((θ + ψ)/2) * sin((θ - ψ)/2) :=
by rw [← sin_pi_div_two_sub, ← sin_pi_div_two_sub, sin_sub_sin, sub_sub_sub_cancel_left,
add_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, add_halves, sub_sub, sub_div π, cos_pi_div_two_sub,
← neg_sub, neg_div, sin_neg, ← neg_mul_eq_mul_neg, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, mul_right_comm]
lemma cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π / 2)
(hy₁ : 0 ≤ y) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2) (hxy : x < y) : cos y < cos x :=
calc cos y = cos x * cos (y - x) - sin x * sin (y - x) :
by rw [← cos_add, add_sub_cancel'_right]
... < (cos x * 1) - sin x * sin (y - x) :
sub_lt_sub_right ((mul_lt_mul_left
(cos_pos_of_neg_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two (lt_of_lt_of_le (neg_neg_of_pos pi_div_two_pos) hx₁)
(lt_of_lt_of_le hxy hy₂))).2
(lt_of_le_of_ne (cos_le_one _) (mt (cos_eq_one_iff_of_lt_of_lt
(show -(2 * π) < y - x, by linarith) (show y - x < 2 * π, by linarith)).1
(sub_ne_zero.2 (ne_of_lt hxy).symm)))) _
... ≤ _ : by rw mul_one;
exact sub_le_self _ (mul_nonneg (sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hx₁ (by linarith))
(sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi (by linarith) (by linarith)))
lemma cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π)
(hy₁ : 0 ≤ y) (hy₂ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x < y) : cos y < cos x :=
match (le_total x (π / 2) : x ≤ π / 2 ∨ π / 2 ≤ x), le_total y (π / 2) with
| or.inl hx, or.inl hy := cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two hx₁ hx hy₁ hy hxy
| or.inl hx, or.inr hy := (lt_or_eq_of_le hx).elim
(λ hx, calc cos y ≤ 0 : cos_nonpos_of_pi_div_two_le_of_le hy (by linarith [pi_pos])
... < cos x : cos_pos_of_neg_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two (by linarith) hx)
(λ hx, calc cos y < 0 : cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt (by linarith) (by linarith [pi_pos])
... = cos x : by rw [hx, cos_pi_div_two])
| or.inr hx, or.inl hy := by linarith
| or.inr hx, or.inr hy := neg_lt_neg_iff.1 (by rw [← cos_pi_sub, ← cos_pi_sub];
apply cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two; linarith)
end
lemma cos_le_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π)
(hy₁ : 0 ≤ y) (hy₂ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x ≤ y) : cos y ≤ cos x :=
(lt_or_eq_of_le hxy).elim
(le_of_lt ∘ cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hx₁ hx₂ hy₁ hy₂)
(λ h, h ▸ le_refl _)
lemma sin_lt_sin_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π / 2) (hy₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ y)
(hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2) (hxy : x < y) : sin x < sin y :=
by rw [← cos_sub_pi_div_two, ← cos_sub_pi_div_two, ← cos_neg (x - _), ← cos_neg (y - _)];
apply cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi; linarith
lemma sin_le_sin_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π / 2) (hy₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ y)
(hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2) (hxy : x ≤ y) : sin x ≤ sin y :=
(lt_or_eq_of_le hxy).elim
(le_of_lt ∘ sin_lt_sin_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two hx₁ hx₂ hy₁ hy₂)
(λ h, h ▸ le_refl _)
lemma sin_inj_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π / 2) (hy₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ y)
(hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2) (hxy : sin x = sin y) : x = y :=
match lt_trichotomy x y with
| or.inl h := absurd (sin_lt_sin_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two hx₁ hx₂ hy₁ hy₂ h) (by rw hxy; exact lt_irrefl _)
| or.inr (or.inl h) := h
| or.inr (or.inr h) := absurd (sin_lt_sin_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two hy₁ hy₂ hx₁ hx₂ h) (by rw hxy; exact lt_irrefl _)
end
lemma cos_inj_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π) (hy₁ : 0 ≤ y) (hy₂ : y ≤ π)
(hxy : cos x = cos y) : x = y :=
begin
rw [← sin_pi_div_two_sub, ← sin_pi_div_two_sub] at hxy,
refine (sub_left_inj).1 (sin_inj_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two _ _ _ _ hxy);
linarith
end
lemma exists_sin_eq : set.Icc (-1:ℝ) 1 ⊆ sin '' set.Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) :=
by convert intermediate_value_Icc
(le_trans (neg_nonpos.2 (le_of_lt pi_div_two_pos)) (le_of_lt pi_div_two_pos))
continuous_sin.continuous_on; simp only [sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two]
lemma sin_lt {x : ℝ} (h : 0 < x) : sin x < x :=
begin
cases le_or_gt x 1 with h' h',
{ have hx : abs x = x := abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt h),
have : abs x ≤ 1, rwa [hx],
have := sin_bound this, rw [abs_le] at this,
have := this.2, rw [sub_le_iff_le_add', hx] at this,
apply lt_of_le_of_lt this, rw [sub_add], apply lt_of_lt_of_le _ (le_of_eq (sub_zero x)),
apply sub_lt_sub_left, rw sub_pos, apply mul_lt_mul',
{ rw [pow_succ x 3], refine le_trans _ (le_of_eq (one_mul _)),
rw mul_le_mul_right, exact h', apply pow_pos h },
norm_num, norm_num, apply pow_pos h },
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (sin_le_one x) h'
end
/- note 1: this inequality is not tight, the tighter inequality is sin x > x - x ^ 3 / 6.
note 2: this is also true for x > 1, but it's nontrivial for x just above 1. -/
lemma sin_gt_sub_cube {x : ℝ} (h : 0 < x) (h' : x ≤ 1) : x - x ^ 3 / 4 < sin x :=
begin
have hx : abs x = x := abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt h),
have : abs x ≤ 1, rwa [hx],
have := sin_bound this, rw [abs_le] at this,
have := this.1, rw [le_sub_iff_add_le, hx] at this,
refine lt_of_lt_of_le _ this,
rw [add_comm, sub_add, sub_neg_eq_add], apply sub_lt_sub_left,
apply add_lt_of_lt_sub_left,
rw (show x ^ 3 / 4 - x ^ 3 / 6 = x ^ 3 / 12,
by simp [div_eq_mul_inv, (mul_sub _ _ _).symm, -sub_eq_add_neg]; congr; norm_num),
apply mul_lt_mul',
{ rw [pow_succ x 3], refine le_trans _ (le_of_eq (one_mul _)),
rw mul_le_mul_right, exact h', apply pow_pos h },
norm_num, norm_num, apply pow_pos h
end
/-- The type of angles -/
def angle : Type :=
quotient_add_group.quotient (gmultiples (2 * π))
namespace angle
instance angle.add_comm_group : add_comm_group angle :=
quotient_add_group.add_comm_group _
instance : inhabited angle := ⟨0⟩
instance angle.has_coe : has_coe ℝ angle :=
⟨quotient.mk'⟩
instance angle.is_add_group_hom : @is_add_group_hom ℝ angle _ _ (coe : ℝ → angle) :=
@quotient_add_group.is_add_group_hom _ _ _ (normal_add_subgroup_of_add_comm_group _)
@[simp] lemma coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : angle) := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y : ℝ) = (↑x + ↑y : angle) := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x : ℝ) = -(↑x : angle) := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y : ℝ) = (↑x - ↑y : angle) := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_smul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) :
↑(add_monoid.smul n x : ℝ) = add_monoid.smul n (↑x : angle) :=
add_monoid_hom.map_smul ⟨coe, coe_zero, coe_add⟩ _ _
@[simp] lemma coe_gsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ↑(gsmul n x : ℝ) = gsmul n (↑x : angle) :=
add_monoid_hom.map_gsmul ⟨coe, coe_zero, coe_add⟩ _ _
@[simp] lemma coe_two_pi : ↑(2 * π : ℝ) = (0 : angle) :=
quotient.sound' ⟨-1, by dsimp only; rw [neg_one_gsmul, add_zero]⟩
lemma angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub {ψ θ : ℝ} : (θ : angle) = ψ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ - ψ = 2 * π * k :=
by simp only [quotient_add_group.eq, gmultiples, set.mem_range, gsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
theorem cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : ℝ} : cos θ = cos ψ ↔ (θ : angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : angle) = -ψ :=
begin
split,
{ intro Hcos,
rw [←sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, mul_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, neg_eq_zero, eq_false_intro two_ne_zero,
false_or, sin_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff] at Hcos,
rcases Hcos with ⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩,
{ right,
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq _ _ (@two_ne_zero ℝ _), ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hn,
rw [← hn, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, sub_add_cancel, mul_assoc,
← gsmul_eq_mul, coe_gsmul, mul_comm, coe_two_pi, gsmul_zero] },
{ left,
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq _ _ (@two_ne_zero ℝ _), eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hn,
rw [← hn, coe_add, mul_assoc,
← gsmul_eq_mul, coe_gsmul, mul_comm, coe_two_pi, gsmul_zero, zero_add] } },
{ rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub],
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩),
rw [← sub_eq_zero_iff_eq, cos_sub_cos, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left _ (@two_ne_zero ℝ _),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero],
rw [←sub_eq_zero_iff_eq, cos_sub_cos, ← sub_neg_eq_add, H, mul_assoc 2 π k,
mul_div_cancel_left _ (@two_ne_zero ℝ _), mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero, zero_mul] }
end
theorem sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : ℝ} : sin θ = sin ψ ↔ (θ : angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : angle) + ψ = π :=
begin
split,
{ intro Hsin, rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_two_sub] at Hsin,
cases cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hsin with h h,
{ left, rw coe_sub at h, exact sub_left_inj.1 h },
right, rw [coe_sub, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, add_sub,
sub_add_eq_add_sub, ← coe_add, add_halves, sub_sub, sub_eq_zero] at h,
exact h.symm },
{ rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ←eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ←coe_sub, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub],
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩),
rw [← sub_eq_zero_iff_eq, sin_sub_sin, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left _ (@two_ne_zero ℝ _),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero, zero_mul],
have H' : θ + ψ = (2 * k) * π + π := by rwa [←sub_add, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add,
mul_assoc, mul_comm π _, ←mul_assoc] at H,
rw [← sub_eq_zero_iff_eq, sin_sub_sin, H', add_div, mul_assoc 2 _ π, mul_div_cancel_left _ (@two_ne_zero ℝ _),
cos_add_pi_div_two, sin_int_mul_pi, neg_zero, mul_zero] }
end
theorem cos_sin_inj {θ ψ : ℝ} (Hcos : cos θ = cos ψ) (Hsin : sin θ = sin ψ) : (θ : angle) = ψ :=
begin
cases cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hcos with hc hc, { exact hc },
cases sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi.mp Hsin with hs hs, { exact hs },
rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, hs] at hc,
cases quotient.exact' hc with n hn, dsimp only at hn,
rw [← neg_one_mul, add_zero, ← sub_eq_zero_iff_eq, gsmul_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← sub_mul,
mul_eq_zero, eq_false_intro (ne_of_gt pi_pos), or_false, sub_neg_eq_add,
← int.cast_zero, ← int.cast_one, ← int.cast_bit0, ← int.cast_mul, ← int.cast_add, int.cast_inj] at hn,
have : (n * 2 + 1) % (2:ℤ) = 0 % (2:ℤ) := congr_arg (%(2:ℤ)) hn,
rw [add_comm, int.add_mul_mod_self] at this,
exact absurd this one_ne_zero
end
end angle
/-- Inverse of the `sin` function, returns values in the range `-π / 2 ≤ arcsin x` and `arcsin x ≤ π / 2`.
If the argument is not between `-1` and `1` it defaults to `0` -/
noncomputable def arcsin (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
if hx : -1 ≤ x ∧ x ≤ 1 then classical.some (exists_sin_eq hx) else 0
lemma arcsin_le_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : arcsin x ≤ π / 2 :=
if hx : -1 ≤ x ∧ x ≤ 1
then by rw [arcsin, dif_pos hx]; exact (classical.some_spec (exists_sin_eq hx)).1.2
else by rw [arcsin, dif_neg hx]; exact le_of_lt pi_div_two_pos
lemma neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin (x : ℝ) : -(π / 2) ≤ arcsin x :=
if hx : -1 ≤ x ∧ x ≤ 1
then by rw [arcsin, dif_pos hx]; exact (classical.some_spec (exists_sin_eq hx)).1.1
else by rw [arcsin, dif_neg hx]; exact neg_nonpos.2 (le_of_lt pi_div_two_pos)
lemma sin_arcsin {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) : sin (arcsin x) = x :=
by rw [arcsin, dif_pos (and.intro hx₁ hx₂)];
exact (classical.some_spec (exists_sin_eq ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩)).2
lemma arcsin_sin {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π / 2) : arcsin (sin x) = x :=
sin_inj_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two (neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _) (arcsin_le_pi_div_two _) hx₁ hx₂
(by rw sin_arcsin (neg_one_le_sin _) (sin_le_one _))
lemma arcsin_inj {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) (hy₁ : -1 ≤ y) (hy₂ : y ≤ 1)
(hxy : arcsin x = arcsin y) : x = y :=
by rw [← sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂, ← sin_arcsin hy₁ hy₂, hxy]
@[simp] lemma arcsin_zero : arcsin 0 = 0 :=
sin_inj_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two
(neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _)
(arcsin_le_pi_div_two _)
(neg_nonpos.2 (le_of_lt pi_div_two_pos))
(le_of_lt pi_div_two_pos)
(by rw [sin_arcsin, sin_zero]; norm_num)
@[simp] lemma arcsin_one : arcsin 1 = π / 2 :=
sin_inj_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two
(neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _)
(arcsin_le_pi_div_two _)
(by linarith [pi_pos])
(le_refl _)
(by rw [sin_arcsin, sin_pi_div_two]; norm_num)
@[simp] lemma arcsin_neg (x : ℝ) : arcsin (-x) = -arcsin x :=
if h : -1 ≤ x ∧ x ≤ 1 then
have -1 ≤ -x ∧ -x ≤ 1, by rwa [neg_le_neg_iff, neg_le, and.comm],
sin_inj_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two
(neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _)
(arcsin_le_pi_div_two _)
(neg_le_neg (arcsin_le_pi_div_two _))
(neg_le.1 (neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _))
(by rw [sin_arcsin this.1 this.2, sin_neg, sin_arcsin h.1 h.2])
else
have ¬(-1 ≤ -x ∧ -x ≤ 1) := by rwa [neg_le_neg_iff, neg_le, and.comm],
by rw [arcsin, arcsin, dif_neg h, dif_neg this, neg_zero]
@[simp] lemma arcsin_neg_one : arcsin (-1) = -(π / 2) := by simp
lemma arcsin_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : 0 ≤ arcsin x :=
if hx₁ : x ≤ 1 then
not_lt.1 (λ h, not_lt.2 hx begin
have := sin_lt_sin_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two
(neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _) (arcsin_le_pi_div_two _)
(neg_nonpos.2 (le_of_lt pi_div_two_pos)) (le_of_lt pi_div_two_pos) h,
rw [real.sin_arcsin, sin_zero] at this; linarith
end)
else by rw [arcsin, dif_neg]; simp [hx₁]
lemma arcsin_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) : arcsin x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨λ h, have sin (arcsin x) = 0, by simp [h],
by rwa [sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂] at this,
λ h, by simp [h]⟩
lemma arcsin_pos {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 < x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) : 0 < arcsin x :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (arcsin_nonneg (le_of_lt hx₁))
(ne.symm (mt (arcsin_eq_zero_iff (by linarith) hx₂).1 (ne_of_lt hx₁).symm))
lemma arcsin_nonpos {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) : arcsin x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 (arcsin_neg x ▸ arcsin_nonneg (neg_nonneg.2 hx))
/-- Inverse of the `cos` function, returns values in the range `0 ≤ arccos x` and `arccos x ≤ π`.
If the argument is not between `-1` and `1` it defaults to `π / 2` -/
noncomputable def arccos (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
π / 2 - arcsin x
lemma arccos_eq_pi_div_two_sub_arcsin (x : ℝ) : arccos x = π / 2 - arcsin x := rfl
lemma arcsin_eq_pi_div_two_sub_arccos (x : ℝ) : arcsin x = π / 2 - arccos x :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, arccos]
lemma arccos_le_pi (x : ℝ) : arccos x ≤ π :=
by unfold arccos; linarith [neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin x]
lemma arccos_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ arccos x :=
by unfold arccos; linarith [arcsin_le_pi_div_two x]
lemma cos_arccos {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) : cos (arccos x) = x :=
by rw [arccos, cos_pi_div_two_sub, sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
lemma arccos_cos {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π) : arccos (cos x) = x :=
by rw [arccos, ← sin_pi_div_two_sub, arcsin_sin]; simp [sub_eq_add_neg]; linarith
lemma arccos_inj {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) (hy₁ : -1 ≤ y) (hy₂ : y ≤ 1)
(hxy : arccos x = arccos y) : x = y :=
arcsin_inj hx₁ hx₂ hy₁ hy₂ $ by simp [arccos, *] at *
@[simp] lemma arccos_zero : arccos 0 = π / 2 := by simp [arccos]
@[simp] lemma arccos_one : arccos 1 = 0 := by simp [arccos]
@[simp] lemma arccos_neg_one : arccos (-1) = π := by simp [arccos, add_halves]
lemma arccos_neg (x : ℝ) : arccos (-x) = π - arccos x :=
by rw [← add_halves π, arccos, arcsin_neg, arccos, add_sub_assoc, sub_sub_self]; simp
lemma cos_arcsin_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ cos (arcsin x) :=
cos_nonneg_of_neg_pi_div_two_le_of_le_pi_div_two
(neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _) (arcsin_le_pi_div_two _)
lemma cos_arcsin {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) : cos (arcsin x) = sqrt (1 - x ^ 2) :=
have sin (arcsin x) ^ 2 + cos (arcsin x) ^ 2 = 1 := sin_sq_add_cos_sq (arcsin x),
begin
rw [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq', ← sqrt_inj (pow_two_nonneg _) (sub_nonneg.2 (sin_sq_le_one (arcsin x))),
pow_two, sqrt_mul_self (cos_arcsin_nonneg _)] at this,
rw [this, sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂],
end
lemma sin_arccos {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) : sin (arccos x) = sqrt (1 - x ^ 2) :=
by rw [arccos_eq_pi_div_two_sub_arcsin, sin_pi_div_two_sub, cos_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
lemma abs_div_sqrt_one_add_lt (x : ℝ) : abs (x / sqrt (1 + x ^ 2)) < 1 :=
have h₁ : 0 < 1 + x ^ 2, from add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg zero_lt_one (pow_two_nonneg _),
have h₂ : 0 < sqrt (1 + x ^ 2), from sqrt_pos.2 h₁,
by rw [abs_div, div_lt_iff (abs_pos_of_pos h₂), one_mul,
mul_self_lt_mul_self_iff (abs_nonneg x) (abs_nonneg _),
← abs_mul, ← abs_mul, mul_self_sqrt (add_nonneg zero_le_one (pow_two_nonneg _)),
abs_of_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg x), abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt h₁), pow_two, add_comm];
exact lt_add_one _
lemma div_sqrt_one_add_lt_one (x : ℝ) : x / sqrt (1 + x ^ 2) < 1 :=
(abs_lt.1 (abs_div_sqrt_one_add_lt _)).2
lemma neg_one_lt_div_sqrt_one_add (x : ℝ) : -1 < x / sqrt (1 + x ^ 2) :=
(abs_lt.1 (abs_div_sqrt_one_add_lt _)).1
lemma tan_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 < x) (hxp : x < π / 2) : 0 < tan x :=
by rw tan_eq_sin_div_cos; exact div_pos (sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h0x (by linarith))
(cos_pos_of_neg_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two (by linarith) hxp)
lemma tan_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 ≤ x) (hxp : x ≤ π / 2) : 0 ≤ tan x :=
match lt_or_eq_of_le h0x, lt_or_eq_of_le hxp with
| or.inl hx0, or.inl hxp := le_of_lt (tan_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi_div_two hx0 hxp)
| or.inl hx0, or.inr hxp := by simp [hxp, tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
| or.inr hx0, _ := by simp [hx0.symm]
end
lemma tan_neg_of_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x < 0) (hpx : -(π / 2) < x) : tan x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 (tan_neg x ▸ tan_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi_div_two (by linarith) (by linarith [pi_pos]))
lemma tan_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_neg_pi_div_two_le {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x ≤ 0) (hpx : -(π / 2) ≤ x) : tan x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 (tan_neg x ▸ tan_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two (by linarith) (by linarith [pi_pos]))
lemma tan_lt_tan_of_nonneg_of_lt_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x < π / 2) (hy₁ : 0 ≤ y)
(hy₂ : y < π / 2) (hxy : x < y) : tan x < tan y :=
begin
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, tan_eq_sin_div_cos],
exact div_lt_div
(sin_lt_sin_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two (by linarith) (le_of_lt hx₂)
(by linarith) (le_of_lt hy₂) hxy)
(cos_le_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hx₁ (by linarith) hy₁ (by linarith) (le_of_lt hxy))
(sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hy₁ (by linarith))
(cos_pos_of_neg_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two (by linarith) hy₂)
end
lemma tan_lt_tan_of_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) < x) (hx₂ : x < π / 2)
(hy₁ : -(π / 2) < y) (hy₂ : y < π / 2) (hxy : x < y) : tan x < tan y :=
match le_total x 0, le_total y 0 with
| or.inl hx0, or.inl hy0 := neg_lt_neg_iff.1 $ by rw [← tan_neg, ← tan_neg]; exact
tan_lt_tan_of_nonneg_of_lt_pi_div_two (neg_nonneg.2 hy0) (neg_lt.2 hy₁)
(neg_nonneg.2 hx0) (neg_lt.2 hx₁) (neg_lt_neg hxy)
| or.inl hx0, or.inr hy0 := (lt_or_eq_of_le hy0).elim
(λ hy0, calc tan x ≤ 0 : tan_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_neg_pi_div_two_le hx0 (le_of_lt hx₁)
... < tan y : tan_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi_div_two hy0 hy₂)
(λ hy0, by rw [← hy0, tan_zero]; exact
tan_neg_of_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt (hy0.symm ▸ hxy) hx₁)
| or.inr hx0, or.inl hy0 := by linarith
| or.inr hx0, or.inr hy0 := tan_lt_tan_of_nonneg_of_lt_pi_div_two hx0 hx₂ hy0 hy₂ hxy
end
lemma tan_inj_of_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) < x) (hx₂ : x < π / 2)
(hy₁ : -(π / 2) < y) (hy₂ : y < π / 2) (hxy : tan x = tan y) : x = y :=
match lt_trichotomy x y with
| or.inl h := absurd (tan_lt_tan_of_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two hx₁ hx₂ hy₁ hy₂ h) (by rw hxy; exact lt_irrefl _)
| or.inr (or.inl h) := h
| or.inr (or.inr h) := absurd (tan_lt_tan_of_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two hy₁ hy₂ hx₁ hx₂ h) (by rw hxy; exact lt_irrefl _)
end
/-- Inverse of the `tan` function, returns values in the range `-π / 2 < arctan x` and `arctan x < π / 2` -/
noncomputable def arctan (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
arcsin (x / sqrt (1 + x ^ 2))
lemma sin_arctan (x : ℝ) : sin (arctan x) = x / sqrt (1 + x ^ 2) :=
sin_arcsin (le_of_lt (neg_one_lt_div_sqrt_one_add _)) (le_of_lt (div_sqrt_one_add_lt_one _))
lemma cos_arctan (x : ℝ) : cos (arctan x) = 1 / sqrt (1 + x ^ 2) :=
have h₁ : (0 : ℝ) < 1 + x ^ 2,
from add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg zero_lt_one (pow_two_nonneg _),
have h₂ : (x / sqrt (1 + x ^ 2)) ^ 2 < 1,
by rw [pow_two, ← abs_mul_self, _root_.abs_mul];
exact mul_lt_one_of_nonneg_of_lt_one_left (abs_nonneg _)
(abs_div_sqrt_one_add_lt _) (le_of_lt (abs_div_sqrt_one_add_lt _)),
by rw [arctan, cos_arcsin (le_of_lt (neg_one_lt_div_sqrt_one_add _)) (le_of_lt (div_sqrt_one_add_lt_one _)),
one_div_eq_inv, ← sqrt_inv, sqrt_inj (sub_nonneg.2 (le_of_lt h₂)) (inv_nonneg.2 (le_of_lt h₁)),
div_pow, pow_two (sqrt _), mul_self_sqrt (le_of_lt h₁),
← domain.mul_left_inj (ne.symm (ne_of_lt h₁)), mul_sub,
mul_div_cancel' _ (ne.symm (ne_of_lt h₁)), mul_inv_cancel (ne.symm (ne_of_lt h₁))];
simp
lemma tan_arctan (x : ℝ) : tan (arctan x) = x :=
by rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, sin_arctan, cos_arctan, div_div_div_div_eq, mul_one,
mul_div_assoc,
div_self (mt sqrt_eq_zero'.1 (not_le_of_gt (add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg zero_lt_one (pow_two_nonneg x)))),
mul_one]
lemma arctan_lt_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : arctan x < π / 2 :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (arcsin_le_pi_div_two _)
(λ h, ne_of_lt (div_sqrt_one_add_lt_one x) $
by rw [← sin_arcsin (le_of_lt (neg_one_lt_div_sqrt_one_add _))
(le_of_lt (div_sqrt_one_add_lt_one _)), ← arctan, h, sin_pi_div_two])
lemma neg_pi_div_two_lt_arctan (x : ℝ) : -(π / 2) < arctan x :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _)
(λ h, ne_of_lt (neg_one_lt_div_sqrt_one_add x) $
by rw [← sin_arcsin (le_of_lt (neg_one_lt_div_sqrt_one_add _))
(le_of_lt (div_sqrt_one_add_lt_one _)), ← arctan, ← h, sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two])
lemma tan_surjective : function.surjective tan :=
function.surjective_of_has_right_inverse ⟨_, tan_arctan⟩
lemma arctan_tan {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) < x) (hx₂ : x < π / 2) : arctan (tan x) = x :=
tan_inj_of_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two (neg_pi_div_two_lt_arctan _)
(arctan_lt_pi_div_two _) hx₁ hx₂ (by rw tan_arctan)
@[simp] lemma arctan_zero : arctan 0 = 0 :=
by simp [arctan]
@[simp] lemma arctan_neg (x : ℝ) : arctan (-x) = - arctan x :=
by simp [arctan, neg_div]
end real
namespace complex
open_locale real
/-- `arg` returns values in the range (-π, π], such that for `x ≠ 0`,
`sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
`arg 0` defaults to `0` -/
noncomputable def arg (x : ℂ) : ℝ :=
if 0 ≤ x.re
then real.arcsin (x.im / x.abs)
else if 0 ≤ x.im
then real.arcsin ((-x).im / x.abs) + π
else real.arcsin ((-x).im / x.abs) - π
lemma arg_le_pi (x : ℂ) : arg x ≤ π :=
if hx₁ : 0 ≤ x.re
then by rw [arg, if_pos hx₁];
exact le_trans (real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two _) (le_of_lt (half_lt_self real.pi_pos))
else
have hx : x ≠ 0, from λ h, by simpa [h, lt_irrefl] using hx₁,
if hx₂ : 0 ≤ x.im
then by rw [arg, if_neg hx₁, if_pos hx₂];
exact le_sub_iff_add_le.1 (by rw sub_self;
exact real.arcsin_nonpos (by rw [neg_im, neg_div, neg_nonpos]; exact div_nonneg hx₂ (abs_pos.2 hx)))
else by rw [arg, if_neg hx₁, if_neg hx₂];
exact sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (le_trans (real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two _)
(by linarith [real.pi_pos]))
lemma neg_pi_lt_arg (x : ℂ) : -π < arg x :=
if hx₁ : 0 ≤ x.re
then by rw [arg, if_pos hx₁];
exact lt_of_lt_of_le (neg_lt_neg (half_lt_self real.pi_pos)) (real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _)
else
have hx : x ≠ 0, from λ h, by simpa [h, lt_irrefl] using hx₁,
if hx₂ : 0 ≤ x.im
then by rw [arg, if_neg hx₁, if_pos hx₂];
exact sub_lt_iff_lt_add.1
(lt_of_lt_of_le (by linarith [real.pi_pos]) (real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _))
else by rw [arg, if_neg hx₁, if_neg hx₂];
exact lt_sub_iff_add_lt.2 (by rw neg_add_self;
exact real.arcsin_pos (by rw [neg_im]; exact div_pos (neg_pos.2 (lt_of_not_ge hx₂))
(abs_pos.2 hx)) (by rw [← abs_neg x]; exact (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_abs_le_one _)).2))
lemma arg_eq_arg_neg_add_pi_of_im_nonneg_of_re_neg {x : ℂ} (hxr : x.re < 0) (hxi : 0 ≤ x.im) :
arg x = arg (-x) + π :=
have 0 ≤ (-x).re, from le_of_lt $ by simpa [neg_pos],
by rw [arg, arg, if_neg (not_le.2 hxr), if_pos this, if_pos hxi, abs_neg]
lemma arg_eq_arg_neg_sub_pi_of_im_neg_of_re_neg {x : ℂ} (hxr : x.re < 0) (hxi : x.im < 0) :
arg x = arg (-x) - π :=
have 0 ≤ (-x).re, from le_of_lt $ by simpa [neg_pos],
by rw [arg, arg, if_neg (not_le.2 hxr), if_neg (not_le.2 hxi), if_pos this, abs_neg]
@[simp] lemma arg_zero : arg 0 = 0 :=
by simp [arg, le_refl]
@[simp] lemma arg_one : arg 1 = 0 :=
by simp [arg, zero_le_one]
@[simp] lemma arg_neg_one : arg (-1) = π :=
by simp [arg, le_refl, not_le.2 (@zero_lt_one ℝ _)]
@[simp] lemma arg_I : arg I = π / 2 :=
by simp [arg, le_refl]
@[simp] lemma arg_neg_I : arg (-I) = -(π / 2) :=
by simp [arg, le_refl]
lemma sin_arg (x : ℂ) : real.sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs :=
by unfold arg; split_ifs;
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, arg, real.sin_arcsin (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_abs_le_one x)).1
(abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_abs_le_one x)).2, real.sin_add, neg_div, real.arcsin_neg,
real.sin_neg]
private lemma cos_arg_of_re_nonneg {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hxr : 0 ≤ x.re) : real.cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs :=
have 0 ≤ 1 - (x.im / abs x) ^ 2,
from sub_nonneg.2 $ by rw [pow_two, ← _root_.abs_mul_self, _root_.abs_mul, ← pow_two];
exact pow_le_one _ (_root_.abs_nonneg _) (abs_im_div_abs_le_one _),
by rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq _ _ (mt abs_eq_zero.1 hx), ← real.mul_self_sqrt (abs_nonneg x),
arg, if_pos hxr, real.cos_arcsin (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_abs_le_one x)).1
(abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_abs_le_one x)).2, ← real.sqrt_mul (abs_nonneg _), ← real.sqrt_mul this,
sub_mul, div_pow, ← pow_two, div_mul_cancel _ (pow_ne_zero 2 (mt abs_eq_zero.1 hx)),
one_mul, pow_two, mul_self_abs, norm_sq, pow_two, add_sub_cancel, real.sqrt_mul_self hxr]
lemma cos_arg {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : real.cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs :=
if hxr : 0 ≤ x.re then cos_arg_of_re_nonneg hx hxr
else
have 0 ≤ (-x).re, from le_of_lt $ by simpa [neg_pos] using hxr,
if hxi : 0 ≤ x.im
then have 0 ≤ (-x).re, from le_of_lt $ by simpa [neg_pos] using hxr,
by rw [arg_eq_arg_neg_add_pi_of_im_nonneg_of_re_neg (not_le.1 hxr) hxi, real.cos_add_pi,
cos_arg_of_re_nonneg (neg_ne_zero.2 hx) this];
simp [neg_div]
else by rw [arg_eq_arg_neg_sub_pi_of_im_neg_of_re_neg (not_le.1 hxr) (not_le.1 hxi)];
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, real.cos_add, neg_div, cos_arg_of_re_nonneg (neg_ne_zero.2 hx) this]
lemma tan_arg {x : ℂ} : real.tan (arg x) = x.im / x.re :=
begin
by_cases h : x = 0,
{ simp only [h, euclidean_domain.zero_div,
complex.zero_im, complex.arg_zero, real.tan_zero, complex.zero_re] },
rw [real.tan_eq_sin_div_cos, sin_arg, cos_arg h,
div_div_div_cancel_right' _ (mt abs_eq_zero.1 h)]
end
lemma arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -π < x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π) :
arg (cos x + sin x * I) = x :=
if hx₃ : -(π / 2) ≤ x ∧ x ≤ π / 2
then
have hx₄ : 0 ≤ (cos x + sin x * I).re,
by simp; exact real.cos_nonneg_of_neg_pi_div_two_le_of_le_pi_div_two hx₃.1 hx₃.2,
by rw [arg, if_pos hx₄];
simp [abs_cos_add_sin_mul_I, sin_of_real_re, real.arcsin_sin hx₃.1 hx₃.2]
else if hx₄ : x < -(π / 2)
then
have hx₅ : ¬0 ≤ (cos x + sin x * I).re :=
suffices ¬ 0 ≤ real.cos x, by simpa,
not_le.2 $ by rw ← real.cos_neg;
apply real.cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt; linarith,
have hx₆ : ¬0 ≤ (cos ↑x + sin ↑x * I).im :=
suffices real.sin x < 0, by simpa,
by apply real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt; linarith,
suffices -π + -real.arcsin (real.sin x) = x,
by rw [arg, if_neg hx₅, if_neg hx₆];
simpa [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, abs_cos_add_sin_mul_I, sin_of_real_re],
by rw [← real.arcsin_neg, ← real.sin_add_pi, real.arcsin_sin]; try {simp [add_left_comm]}; linarith
else
have hx₅ : π / 2 < x, by cases not_and_distrib.1 hx₃; linarith,
have hx₆ : ¬0 ≤ (cos x + sin x * I).re :=
suffices ¬0 ≤ real.cos x, by simpa,
not_le.2 $ by apply real.cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt; linarith,
have hx₇ : 0 ≤ (cos x + sin x * I).im :=
suffices 0 ≤ real.sin x, by simpa,
by apply real.sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi; linarith,
suffices π - real.arcsin (real.sin x) = x,
by rw [arg, if_neg hx₆, if_pos hx₇];
simpa [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, abs_cos_add_sin_mul_I, sin_of_real_re],
by rw [← real.sin_pi_sub, real.arcsin_sin]; simp [sub_eq_add_neg]; linarith
lemma arg_eq_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
arg x = arg y ↔ (abs y / abs x : ℂ) * x = y :=
have hax : abs x ≠ 0, from (mt abs_eq_zero.1 hx),
have hay : abs y ≠ 0, from (mt abs_eq_zero.1 hy),
⟨λ h,
begin
have hcos := congr_arg real.cos h,
rw [cos_arg hx, cos_arg hy, div_eq_div_iff hax hay] at hcos,
have hsin := congr_arg real.sin h,
rw [sin_arg, sin_arg, div_eq_div_iff hax hay] at hsin,
apply complex.ext,
{ rw [mul_re, ← of_real_div, of_real_re, of_real_im, zero_mul, sub_zero, mul_comm,
← mul_div_assoc, hcos, mul_div_cancel _ hax] },
{ rw [mul_im, ← of_real_div, of_real_re, of_real_im, zero_mul, add_zero,
mul_comm, ← mul_div_assoc, hsin, mul_div_cancel _ hax] }
end,
λ h,
have hre : abs (y / x) * x.re = y.re,
by rw ← of_real_div at h;
simpa [-of_real_div] using congr_arg re h,
have hre' : abs (x / y) * y.re = x.re,
by rw [← hre, abs_div, abs_div, ← mul_assoc, div_mul_div,
mul_comm (abs _), div_self (mul_ne_zero hay hax), one_mul],
have him : abs (y / x) * x.im = y.im,
by rw ← of_real_div at h;
simpa [-of_real_div] using congr_arg im h,
have him' : abs (x / y) * y.im = x.im,
by rw [← him, abs_div, abs_div, ← mul_assoc, div_mul_div,
mul_comm (abs _), div_self (mul_ne_zero hay hax), one_mul],
have hxya : x.im / abs x = y.im / abs y,
by rw [← him, abs_div, mul_comm, ← mul_div_comm, mul_div_cancel_left _ hay],
have hnxya : (-x).im / abs x = (-y).im / abs y,
by rw [neg_im, neg_im, neg_div, neg_div, hxya],
if hxr : 0 ≤ x.re
then
have hyr : 0 ≤ y.re, from hre ▸ mul_nonneg (abs_nonneg _) hxr,
by simp [arg, *] at *
else
have hyr : ¬ 0 ≤ y.re, from λ hyr, hxr $ hre' ▸ mul_nonneg (abs_nonneg _) hyr,
if hxi : 0 ≤ x.im
then
have hyi : 0 ≤ y.im, from him ▸ mul_nonneg (abs_nonneg _) hxi,
by simp [arg, *] at *
else
have hyi : ¬ 0 ≤ y.im, from λ hyi, hxi $ him' ▸ mul_nonneg (abs_nonneg _) hyi,
by simp [arg, *] at *⟩
lemma arg_real_mul (x : ℂ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : arg (r * x) = arg x :=
if hx : x = 0 then by simp [hx]
else (arg_eq_arg_iff (mul_ne_zero (of_real_ne_zero.2 (ne_of_lt hr).symm) hx) hx).2 $
by rw [abs_mul, abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hr), ← mul_assoc,
of_real_mul, mul_comm (r : ℂ), ← div_div_eq_div_mul,
div_mul_cancel _ (of_real_ne_zero.2 (ne_of_lt hr).symm),
div_self (of_real_ne_zero.2 (mt abs_eq_zero.1 hx)), one_mul]
lemma ext_abs_arg {x y : ℂ} (h₁ : x.abs = y.abs) (h₂ : x.arg = y.arg) : x = y :=
if hy : y = 0 then by simp * at *
else have hx : x ≠ 0, from λ hx, by simp [*, eq_comm] at *,
by rwa [arg_eq_arg_iff hx hy, h₁, div_self (of_real_ne_zero.2 (mt abs_eq_zero.1 hy)), one_mul] at h₂
lemma arg_of_real_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : arg x = 0 :=
by simp [arg, hx]
lemma arg_of_real_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) : arg x = π :=
by rw [arg_eq_arg_neg_add_pi_of_im_nonneg_of_re_neg, ← of_real_neg, arg_of_real_of_nonneg];
simp [*, le_iff_eq_or_lt, lt_neg]
/-- Inverse of the `exp` function. Returns values such that `(log x).im > - π` and `(log x).im ≤ π`.
`log 0 = 0`-/
noncomputable def log (x : ℂ) : ℂ := x.abs.log + arg x * I
lemma log_re (x : ℂ) : x.log.re = x.abs.log := by simp [log]
lemma log_im (x : ℂ) : x.log.im = x.arg := by simp [log]
lemma exp_log {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : exp (log x) = x :=
by rw [log, exp_add_mul_I, ← of_real_sin, sin_arg, ← of_real_cos, cos_arg hx,
← of_real_exp, real.exp_log (abs_pos.2 hx), mul_add, of_real_div, of_real_div,
mul_div_cancel' _ (of_real_ne_zero.2 (mt abs_eq_zero.1 hx)), ← mul_assoc,
mul_div_cancel' _ (of_real_ne_zero.2 (mt abs_eq_zero.1 hx)), re_add_im]
lemma exp_inj_of_neg_pi_lt_of_le_pi {x y : ℂ} (hx₁ : -π < x.im) (hx₂ : x.im ≤ π)
(hy₁ : - π < y.im) (hy₂ : y.im ≤ π) (hxy : exp x = exp y) : x = y :=
by rw [exp_eq_exp_re_mul_sin_add_cos, exp_eq_exp_re_mul_sin_add_cos y] at hxy;
exact complex.ext
(real.exp_injective $
by simpa [abs_mul, abs_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg complex.abs hxy)
(by simpa [(of_real_exp _).symm, - of_real_exp, arg_real_mul _ (real.exp_pos _),
arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I hx₁ hx₂, arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I hy₁ hy₂] using congr_arg arg hxy)
lemma log_exp {x : ℂ} (hx₁ : -π < x.im) (hx₂: x.im ≤ π) : log (exp x) = x :=
exp_inj_of_neg_pi_lt_of_le_pi
(by rw log_im; exact neg_pi_lt_arg _)
(by rw log_im; exact arg_le_pi _)
hx₁ hx₂ (by rw [exp_log (exp_ne_zero _)])
lemma of_real_log {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : (x.log : ℂ) = log x :=
complex.ext
(by rw [log_re, of_real_re, abs_of_nonneg hx])
(by rw [of_real_im, log_im, arg_of_real_of_nonneg hx])
lemma log_of_real_re (x : ℝ) : (log (x : ℂ)).re = real.log x := by simp [log_re]
@[simp] lemma log_zero : log 0 = 0 := by simp [log]
@[simp] lemma log_one : log 1 = 0 := by simp [log]
lemma log_neg_one : log (-1) = π * I := by simp [log]
lemma log_I : log I = π / 2 * I := by simp [log]
lemma log_neg_I : log (-I) = -(π / 2) * I := by simp [log]
lemma exp_eq_one_iff {x : ℂ} : exp x = 1 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, x = n * ((2 * π) * I) :=
have real.exp (x.re) * real.cos (x.im) = 1 → real.cos x.im ≠ -1,
from λ h₁ h₂, begin
rw [h₂, mul_neg_eq_neg_mul_symm, mul_one, neg_eq_iff_neg_eq] at h₁,
have := real.exp_pos x.re,
rw ← h₁ at this,
exact absurd this (by norm_num)
end,
calc exp x = 1 ↔ (exp x).re = 1 ∧ (exp x).im = 0 : by simp [complex.ext_iff]
... ↔ real.cos x.im = 1 ∧ real.sin x.im = 0 ∧ x.re = 0 :
begin
rw exp_eq_exp_re_mul_sin_add_cos,
simp [complex.ext_iff, cos_of_real_re, sin_of_real_re, exp_of_real_re,
real.exp_ne_zero],
split; finish [real.sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq]
end
... ↔ (∃ n : ℤ, ↑n * (2 * π) = x.im) ∧ (∃ n : ℤ, ↑n * π = x.im) ∧ x.re = 0 :
by rw [real.sin_eq_zero_iff, real.cos_eq_one_iff]
... ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, x = n * ((2 * π) * I) :
⟨λ ⟨⟨n, hn⟩, ⟨m, hm⟩, h⟩, ⟨n, by simp [complex.ext_iff, hn.symm, h]⟩,
λ ⟨n, hn⟩, ⟨⟨n, by simp [hn]⟩, ⟨2 * n, by simp [hn, mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]⟩,
by simp [hn]⟩⟩
lemma exp_eq_exp_iff_exp_sub_eq_one {x y : ℂ} : exp x = exp y ↔ exp (x - y) = 1 :=
by rw [exp_sub, div_eq_one_iff_eq _ (exp_ne_zero _)]
lemma exp_eq_exp_iff_exists_int {x y : ℂ} : exp x = exp y ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, x = y + n * ((2 * π) * I) :=
by simp only [exp_eq_exp_iff_exp_sub_eq_one, exp_eq_one_iff, sub_eq_iff_eq_add']
@[simp] lemma cos_pi_div_two : cos (π / 2) = 0 :=
calc cos (π / 2) = real.cos (π / 2) : by rw [of_real_cos]; simp
... = 0 : by simp
@[simp] lemma sin_pi_div_two : sin (π / 2) = 1 :=
calc sin (π / 2) = real.sin (π / 2) : by rw [of_real_sin]; simp
... = 1 : by simp
@[simp] lemma sin_pi : sin π = 0 :=
by rw [← of_real_sin, real.sin_pi]; simp
@[simp] lemma cos_pi : cos π = -1 :=
by rw [← of_real_cos, real.cos_pi]; simp
@[simp] lemma sin_two_pi : sin (2 * π) = 0 :=
by simp [two_mul, sin_add]
@[simp] lemma cos_two_pi : cos (2 * π) = 1 :=
by simp [two_mul, cos_add]
lemma sin_add_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π) = -sin x :=
by simp [sin_add]
lemma sin_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + 2 * π) = sin x :=
by simp [sin_add_pi, sin_add, sin_two_pi, cos_two_pi]
lemma cos_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + 2 * π) = cos x :=
by simp [cos_add, cos_two_pi, sin_two_pi]
lemma sin_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (π - x) = sin x :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
lemma cos_add_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + π) = -cos x :=
by simp [cos_add]
lemma cos_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (π - x) = -cos x :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, cos_add]
lemma sin_add_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π / 2) = cos x :=
by simp [sin_add]
lemma sin_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : sin (x - π / 2) = -cos x :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
lemma sin_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (π / 2 - x) = cos x :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
lemma cos_add_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : cos (x + π / 2) = -sin x :=
by simp [cos_add]
lemma cos_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : cos (x - π / 2) = sin x :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, cos_add]
lemma cos_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (π / 2 - x) = sin x :=
by rw [← cos_neg, neg_sub, cos_sub_pi_div_two]
lemma sin_nat_mul_pi (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
by induction n; simp [add_mul, sin_add, *]
lemma sin_int_mul_pi (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
by cases n; simp [add_mul, sin_add, *, sin_nat_mul_pi]
lemma cos_nat_mul_two_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
by induction n; simp [*, mul_add, cos_add, add_mul, cos_two_pi, sin_two_pi]
lemma cos_int_mul_two_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
by cases n; simp only [cos_nat_mul_two_pi, int.of_nat_eq_coe,
int.neg_succ_of_nat_coe, int.cast_coe_nat, int.cast_neg,
(neg_mul_eq_neg_mul _ _).symm, cos_neg]
lemma cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) + π) = -1 :=
by simp [cos_add, sin_add, cos_int_mul_two_pi]
end complex
|
7edac558076d4406a097eafbabb6bc6baea9a7ca | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /src/Lean/ParserCompiler.lean | 492bd24bc45d8382edc2f188b27c3a646ad6c15b | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,749 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sebastian Ullrich. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sebastian Ullrich
-/
import Lean.Meta.ReduceEval
import Lean.KeyedDeclsAttribute
import Lean.ParserCompiler.Attribute
import Lean.Parser.Extension
/-!
Gadgets for compiling parser declarations into other programs, such as pretty printers.
-/
namespace Lean
namespace ParserCompiler
structure Context (α : Type) where
varName : Name
categoryAttr : KeyedDeclsAttribute α
combinatorAttr : CombinatorAttribute
def Context.tyName {α} (ctx : Context α) : Name := ctx.categoryAttr.defn.valueTypeName
/-- Replace all references of `Parser` with `tyName` -/
def replaceParserTy {α} (ctx : Context α) (e : Expr) : Expr :=
e.replace fun e =>
-- strip `optParam`
let e := if e.isOptParam then e.appFn!.appArg! else e
if e.isConstOf `Lean.Parser.Parser then mkConst ctx.tyName else none
open Meta Parser in
/-- Takes an expression of type `Parser`, and determines the syntax kind of the root node it produces. -/
partial def parserNodeKind? (e : Expr) : MetaM (Option Name) := do
let reduceEval? e : MetaM (Option Name) := do
try pure <| some (← reduceEval e) catch _ => pure none
let e ← whnfCore e
if e matches Expr.lam .. then
lambdaLetTelescope e fun _ e => parserNodeKind? e
else if e.isAppOfArity ``leadingNode 3 || e.isAppOfArity ``trailingNode 4 || e.isAppOfArity ``node 2 then
reduceEval? (e.getArg! 0)
else if e.isAppOfArity ``withAntiquot 2 then
parserNodeKind? (e.getArg! 1)
else forallTelescope (← inferType e.getAppFn) fun params _ => do
let lctx ← getLCtx
-- if there is exactly one parameter of type `Parser`, search there
if let [(i, _)] := params.toList.enum.filter (lctx.getFVar! ·.2 |>.type.isConstOf ``Parser) then
parserNodeKind? (e.getArg! i)
else
return none
section
open Meta
variable {α} (ctx : Context α) (builtin : Bool) (force : Bool) in
/--
Translate an expression of type `Parser` into one of type `tyName`, tagging intermediary constants with
`ctx.combinatorAttr`. If `force` is `false`, refuse to do so for imported constants. -/
partial def compileParserExpr (e : Expr) : MetaM Expr := do
let e ← whnfCore e
match e with
| .lam .. => lambdaLetTelescope e fun xs b => compileParserExpr b >>= mkLambdaFVars xs
| .fvar .. => return e
| _ => do
let fn := e.getAppFn
let .const c .. := fn | throwError "call of unknown parser at '{e}'"
-- call the translated `p` with (a prefix of) the arguments of `e`, recursing for arguments
-- of type `ty` (i.e. formerly `Parser`)
let mkCall (p : Name) := do
let ty ← inferType (mkConst p)
forallTelescope ty fun params _ => do
let mut p := mkConst p
let args := e.getAppArgs
for i in [:Nat.min params.size args.size] do
let param := params[i]!
let arg := args[i]!
let paramTy ← inferType param
let resultTy ← forallTelescope paramTy fun _ b => pure b
let arg ← if resultTy.isConstOf ctx.tyName then compileParserExpr arg else pure arg
p := mkApp p arg
return p
let env ← getEnv
match ctx.combinatorAttr.getDeclFor? env c with
| some p => mkCall p
| none =>
let c' := c ++ ctx.varName
let cinfo ← getConstInfo c
let resultTy ← forallTelescope cinfo.type fun _ b => pure b
if resultTy.isConstOf `Lean.Parser.TrailingParser || resultTy.isConstOf `Lean.Parser.Parser then do
-- synthesize a new `[combinatorAttr c]`
let some value ← pure cinfo.value?
| throwError "don't know how to generate {ctx.varName} for non-definition '{e}'"
unless (env.getModuleIdxFor? c).isNone || force do
throwError "refusing to generate code for imported parser declaration '{c}'; use `@[run_parser_attribute_hooks]` on its definition instead."
let value ← compileParserExpr <| replaceParserTy ctx value
let ty ← forallTelescope cinfo.type fun params _ =>
params.foldrM (init := mkConst ctx.tyName) fun param ty => do
let paramTy ← replaceParserTy ctx <$> inferType param
return mkForall `_ BinderInfo.default paramTy ty
let decl := Declaration.defnDecl {
name := c', levelParams := []
type := ty, value := value, hints := ReducibilityHints.opaque, safety := DefinitionSafety.safe
}
let env ← getEnv
let env ← match env.addAndCompile {} decl with
| Except.ok env => pure env
| Except.error kex => do throwError (← (kex.toMessageData {}).toString)
setEnv <| ctx.combinatorAttr.setDeclFor env c c'
if cinfo.type.isConst then
if let some kind ← parserNodeKind? cinfo.value! then
-- If the parser is parameter-less and produces a node of kind `kind`,
-- then tag the compiled definition as `[(builtin)Parenthesizer kind]`
-- (or `[(builtin)Formatter kind]`, resp.)
let attrName := if builtin then ctx.categoryAttr.defn.builtinName else ctx.categoryAttr.defn.name
-- Create syntax node for a simple attribute of the form
-- `def simple := leading_parser ident >> optional (ident <|> priorityParser)`
let stx := mkNode `Lean.Parser.Attr.simple #[mkIdent attrName, mkNullNode #[mkIdent kind]]
Attribute.add c' attrName stx
mkCall c'
else
-- if this is a generic function, e.g. `AndThen.andthen`, it's easier to just unfold it until we are
-- back to parser combinators
let some e' ← unfoldDefinition? e
| throwError "don't know how to generate {ctx.varName} for non-parser combinator '{e}'"
compileParserExpr e'
end
variable {α} (ctx : Context α) (builtin : Bool) in
def compileEmbeddedParsers : ParserDescr → MetaM Unit
| ParserDescr.const _ => pure ()
| ParserDescr.unary _ d => compileEmbeddedParsers d
| ParserDescr.binary _ d₁ d₂ => compileEmbeddedParsers d₁ *> compileEmbeddedParsers d₂
| ParserDescr.parser constName => discard <| compileParserExpr ctx (mkConst constName) (builtin := builtin) (force := false)
| ParserDescr.node _ _ d => compileEmbeddedParsers d
| ParserDescr.nodeWithAntiquot _ _ d => compileEmbeddedParsers d
| ParserDescr.sepBy p _ psep _ => compileEmbeddedParsers p *> compileEmbeddedParsers psep
| ParserDescr.sepBy1 p _ psep _ => compileEmbeddedParsers p *> compileEmbeddedParsers psep
| ParserDescr.trailingNode _ _ _ d => compileEmbeddedParsers d
| ParserDescr.symbol _ => pure ()
| ParserDescr.nonReservedSymbol _ _ => pure ()
| ParserDescr.cat _ _ => pure ()
/-- Precondition: `α` must match `ctx.tyName`. -/
unsafe def registerParserCompiler {α} (ctx : Context α) : IO Unit := do
Parser.registerParserAttributeHook {
postAdd := fun catName constName builtin => do
let info ← getConstInfo constName
if info.type.isConstOf `Lean.ParserDescr || info.type.isConstOf `Lean.TrailingParserDescr then
let d ← evalConstCheck ParserDescr `Lean.ParserDescr constName <|>
evalConstCheck TrailingParserDescr `Lean.TrailingParserDescr constName
compileEmbeddedParsers ctx d (builtin := builtin) |>.run'
else
-- `[run_builtin_parser_attribute_hooks]` => force compilation even if imported, do not apply `ctx.categoryAttr`.
let force := catName.isAnonymous
discard (compileParserExpr ctx (mkConst constName) (builtin := builtin) (force := force)).run'
}
end ParserCompiler
end Lean
|
621a0f193db83b47163a8469866c34f9253f3842 | 4d2583807a5ac6caaffd3d7a5f646d61ca85d532 | /src/group_theory/subgroup/basic.lean | e8ca3cddd747b203d90b4294f4214ca35d8e37cd | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AntoineChambert-Loir/mathlib | 64aabb896129885f12296a799818061bc90da1ff | 07be904260ab6e36a5769680b6012f03a4727134 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,187,631,771 | 1,636,719,886,000 | 1,636,719,886,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 98,211 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import group_theory.submonoid.pointwise
import group_theory.submonoid.membership
import group_theory.submonoid.center
import algebra.group.conj
import order.atoms
/-!
# Subgroups
This file defines multiplicative and additive subgroups as an extension of submonoids, in a bundled
form (unbundled subgroups are in `deprecated/subgroups.lean`).
We prove subgroups of a group form a complete lattice, and results about images and preimages of
subgroups under group homomorphisms. The bundled subgroups use bundled monoid homomorphisms.
There are also theorems about the subgroups generated by an element or a subset of a group,
defined both inductively and as the infimum of the set of subgroups containing a given
element/subset.
Special thanks goes to Amelia Livingston and Yury Kudryashov for their help and inspiration.
## Main definitions
Notation used here:
- `G N` are `group`s
- `A` is an `add_group`
- `H K` are `subgroup`s of `G` or `add_subgroup`s of `A`
- `x` is an element of type `G` or type `A`
- `f g : N →* G` are group homomorphisms
- `s k` are sets of elements of type `G`
Definitions in the file:
* `subgroup G` : the type of subgroups of a group `G`
* `add_subgroup A` : the type of subgroups of an additive group `A`
* `complete_lattice (subgroup G)` : the subgroups of `G` form a complete lattice
* `subgroup.closure k` : the minimal subgroup that includes the set `k`
* `subgroup.subtype` : the natural group homomorphism from a subgroup of group `G` to `G`
* `subgroup.gi` : `closure` forms a Galois insertion with the coercion to set
* `subgroup.comap H f` : the preimage of a subgroup `H` along the group homomorphism `f` is also a
subgroup
* `subgroup.map f H` : the image of a subgroup `H` along the group homomorphism `f` is also a
subgroup
* `subgroup.prod H K` : the product of subgroups `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K`
is a subgroup of `G × N`
* `monoid_hom.range f` : the range of the group homomorphism `f` is a subgroup
* `monoid_hom.ker f` : the kernel of a group homomorphism `f` is the subgroup of elements `x : G`
such that `f x = 1`
* `monoid_hom.eq_locus f g` : given group homomorphisms `f`, `g`, the elements of `G` such that
`f x = g x` form a subgroup of `G`
* `is_simple_group G` : a class indicating that a group has exactly two normal subgroups
## Implementation notes
Subgroup inclusion is denoted `≤` rather than `⊆`, although `∈` is defined as
membership of a subgroup's underlying set.
## Tags
subgroup, subgroups
-/
open_locale big_operators pointwise
variables {G : Type*} [group G]
variables {A : Type*} [add_group A]
set_option old_structure_cmd true
/-- A subgroup of a group `G` is a subset containing 1, closed under multiplication
and closed under multiplicative inverse. -/
structure subgroup (G : Type*) [group G] extends submonoid G :=
(inv_mem' {x} : x ∈ carrier → x⁻¹ ∈ carrier)
/-- An additive subgroup of an additive group `G` is a subset containing 0, closed
under addition and additive inverse. -/
structure add_subgroup (G : Type*) [add_group G] extends add_submonoid G:=
(neg_mem' {x} : x ∈ carrier → -x ∈ carrier)
attribute [to_additive] subgroup
attribute [to_additive add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid] subgroup.to_submonoid
/-- Reinterpret a `subgroup` as a `submonoid`. -/
add_decl_doc subgroup.to_submonoid
/-- Reinterpret an `add_subgroup` as an `add_submonoid`. -/
add_decl_doc add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid
namespace subgroup
@[to_additive]
instance : set_like (subgroup G) G :=
⟨subgroup.carrier, λ p q h, by cases p; cases q; congr'⟩
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma mem_carrier {s : subgroup G} {x : G} : x ∈ s.carrier ↔ x ∈ s := iff.rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma mem_mk {s : set G} {x : G} (h_one) (h_mul) (h_inv) :
x ∈ mk s h_one h_mul h_inv ↔ x ∈ s := iff.rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma coe_set_mk {s : set G} (h_one) (h_mul) (h_inv) :
(mk s h_one h_mul h_inv : set G) = s := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma mk_le_mk {s t : set G} (h_one) (h_mul) (h_inv) (h_one') (h_mul') (h_inv') :
mk s h_one h_mul h_inv ≤ mk t h_one' h_mul' h_inv' ↔ s ⊆ t := iff.rfl
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
@[to_additive "See Note [custom simps projection]"]
def simps.coe (S : subgroup G) : set G := S
initialize_simps_projections subgroup (carrier → coe)
initialize_simps_projections add_subgroup (carrier → coe)
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma coe_to_submonoid (K : subgroup G) : (K.to_submonoid : set G) = K := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma mem_to_submonoid (K : subgroup G) (x : G) : x ∈ K.to_submonoid ↔ x ∈ K := iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
instance (K : subgroup G) [d : decidable_pred (∈ K)] [fintype G] : fintype K :=
show fintype {g : G // g ∈ K}, from infer_instance
@[to_additive]
theorem to_submonoid_injective :
function.injective (to_submonoid : subgroup G → submonoid G) :=
λ p q h, set_like.ext'_iff.2 (show _, from set_like.ext'_iff.1 h)
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem to_submonoid_eq {p q : subgroup G} : p.to_submonoid = q.to_submonoid ↔ p = q :=
to_submonoid_injective.eq_iff
@[to_additive, mono] lemma to_submonoid_strict_mono :
strict_mono (to_submonoid : subgroup G → submonoid G) := λ _ _, id
attribute [mono] add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid_strict_mono
@[to_additive, mono]
lemma to_submonoid_mono : monotone (to_submonoid : subgroup G → submonoid G) :=
to_submonoid_strict_mono.monotone
attribute [mono] add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid_mono
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma to_submonoid_le {p q : subgroup G} : p.to_submonoid ≤ q.to_submonoid ↔ p ≤ q :=
iff.rfl
end subgroup
/-!
### Conversion to/from `additive`/`multiplicative`
-/
section mul_add
/-- Supgroups of a group `G` are isomorphic to additive subgroups of `additive G`. -/
@[simps]
def subgroup.to_add_subgroup : subgroup G ≃o add_subgroup (additive G) :=
{ to_fun := λ S,
{ neg_mem' := S.inv_mem',
..S.to_submonoid.to_add_submonoid },
inv_fun := λ S,
{ inv_mem' := S.neg_mem',
..S.to_add_submonoid.to_submonoid' },
left_inv := λ x, by cases x; refl,
right_inv := λ x, by cases x; refl,
map_rel_iff' := λ a b, iff.rfl, }
/-- Additive subgroup of an additive group `additive G` are isomorphic to subgroup of `G`. -/
abbreviation add_subgroup.to_subgroup' : add_subgroup (additive G) ≃o subgroup G :=
subgroup.to_add_subgroup.symm
/-- Additive supgroups of an additive group `A` are isomorphic to subgroups of `multiplicative A`.
-/
@[simps]
def add_subgroup.to_subgroup : add_subgroup A ≃o subgroup (multiplicative A) :=
{ to_fun := λ S,
{ inv_mem' := S.neg_mem',
..S.to_add_submonoid.to_submonoid },
inv_fun := λ S,
{ neg_mem' := S.inv_mem',
..S.to_submonoid.to_add_submonoid' },
left_inv := λ x, by cases x; refl,
right_inv := λ x, by cases x; refl,
map_rel_iff' := λ a b, iff.rfl, }
/-- Subgroups of an additive group `multiplicative A` are isomorphic to additive subgroups of `A`.
-/
abbreviation subgroup.to_add_subgroup' : subgroup (multiplicative A) ≃o add_subgroup A :=
add_subgroup.to_subgroup.symm
end mul_add
namespace subgroup
variables (H K : subgroup G)
/-- Copy of a subgroup with a new `carrier` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities.-/
@[to_additive "Copy of an additive subgroup with a new `carrier` equal to the old one.
Useful to fix definitional equalities"]
protected def copy (K : subgroup G) (s : set G) (hs : s = K) : subgroup G :=
{ carrier := s,
one_mem' := hs.symm ▸ K.one_mem',
mul_mem' := hs.symm ▸ K.mul_mem',
inv_mem' := hs.symm ▸ K.inv_mem' }
@[simp, to_additive] lemma coe_copy (K : subgroup G) (s : set G) (hs : s = ↑K) :
(K.copy s hs : set G) = s := rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma copy_eq (K : subgroup G) (s : set G) (hs : s = ↑K) : K.copy s hs = K :=
set_like.coe_injective hs
/-- Two subgroups are equal if they have the same elements. -/
@[ext, to_additive "Two `add_subgroup`s are equal if they have the same elements."]
theorem ext {H K : subgroup G} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ H ↔ x ∈ K) : H = K := set_like.ext h
/-- A subgroup contains the group's 1. -/
@[to_additive "An `add_subgroup` contains the group's 0."]
theorem one_mem : (1 : G) ∈ H := H.one_mem'
/-- A subgroup is closed under multiplication. -/
@[to_additive "An `add_subgroup` is closed under addition."]
theorem mul_mem {x y : G} : x ∈ H → y ∈ H → x * y ∈ H := λ hx hy, H.mul_mem' hx hy
/-- A subgroup is closed under inverse. -/
@[to_additive "An `add_subgroup` is closed under inverse."]
theorem inv_mem {x : G} : x ∈ H → x⁻¹ ∈ H := λ hx, H.inv_mem' hx
/-- A subgroup is closed under division. -/
@[to_additive "An `add_subgroup` is closed under subtraction."]
theorem div_mem {x y : G} (hx : x ∈ H) (hy : y ∈ H) : x / y ∈ H :=
by simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using H.mul_mem' hx (H.inv_mem' hy)
@[simp, to_additive] theorem inv_mem_iff {x : G} : x⁻¹ ∈ H ↔ x ∈ H :=
⟨λ h, inv_inv x ▸ H.inv_mem h, H.inv_mem⟩
@[to_additive] lemma div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
by rw [← H.inv_mem_iff, div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv_rev, inv_inv]
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem inv_coe_set : (H : set G)⁻¹ = H :=
by { ext, simp, }
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem (K : subgroup G) {P : G → Prop} :
(∃ (x : G), x ∈ K ∧ P x⁻¹) ↔ ∃ x ∈ K, P x :=
by split; { rintros ⟨x, x_in, hx⟩, exact ⟨x⁻¹, inv_mem K x_in, by simp [hx]⟩ }
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_mem_cancel_right {x y : G} (h : x ∈ H) : y * x ∈ H ↔ y ∈ H :=
⟨λ hba, by simpa using H.mul_mem hba (H.inv_mem h), λ hb, H.mul_mem hb h⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_mem_cancel_left {x y : G} (h : x ∈ H) : x * y ∈ H ↔ y ∈ H :=
⟨λ hab, by simpa using H.mul_mem (H.inv_mem h) hab, H.mul_mem h⟩
/-- Product of a list of elements in a subgroup is in the subgroup. -/
@[to_additive "Sum of a list of elements in an `add_subgroup` is in the `add_subgroup`."]
lemma list_prod_mem {l : list G} : (∀ x ∈ l, x ∈ K) → l.prod ∈ K :=
K.to_submonoid.list_prod_mem
/-- Product of a multiset of elements in a subgroup of a `comm_group` is in the subgroup. -/
@[to_additive "Sum of a multiset of elements in an `add_subgroup` of an `add_comm_group`
is in the `add_subgroup`."]
lemma multiset_prod_mem {G} [comm_group G] (K : subgroup G) (g : multiset G) :
(∀ a ∈ g, a ∈ K) → g.prod ∈ K := K.to_submonoid.multiset_prod_mem g
/-- Product of elements of a subgroup of a `comm_group` indexed by a `finset` is in the
subgroup. -/
@[to_additive "Sum of elements in an `add_subgroup` of an `add_comm_group` indexed by a `finset`
is in the `add_subgroup`."]
lemma prod_mem {G : Type*} [comm_group G] (K : subgroup G)
{ι : Type*} {t : finset ι} {f : ι → G} (h : ∀ c ∈ t, f c ∈ K) :
∏ c in t, f c ∈ K :=
K.to_submonoid.prod_mem h
@[to_additive add_subgroup.nsmul_mem]
lemma pow_mem {x : G} (hx : x ∈ K) : ∀ n : ℕ, x ^ n ∈ K := K.to_submonoid.pow_mem hx
@[to_additive]
lemma zpow_mem {x : G} (hx : x ∈ K) : ∀ n : ℤ, x ^ n ∈ K
| (n : ℕ) := by { rw [zpow_coe_nat], exact pow_mem _ hx n }
| -[1+ n] := by { rw [zpow_neg_succ_of_nat], exact K.inv_mem (K.pow_mem hx n.succ) }
/-- Construct a subgroup from a nonempty set that is closed under division. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a subgroup from a nonempty set that is closed under subtraction"]
def of_div (s : set G) (hsn : s.nonempty) (hs : ∀ x y ∈ s, x * y⁻¹ ∈ s) : subgroup G :=
have one_mem : (1 : G) ∈ s, from let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hsn in by simpa using hs x x hx hx,
have inv_mem : ∀ x, x ∈ s → x⁻¹ ∈ s, from λ x hx, by simpa using hs 1 x one_mem hx,
{ carrier := s,
one_mem' := one_mem,
inv_mem' := inv_mem,
mul_mem' := λ x y hx hy, by simpa using hs x y⁻¹ hx (inv_mem y hy) }
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a multiplication. -/
@[to_additive "An `add_subgroup` of an `add_group` inherits an addition."]
instance has_mul : has_mul H := H.to_submonoid.has_mul
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a 1. -/
@[to_additive "An `add_subgroup` of an `add_group` inherits a zero."]
instance has_one : has_one H := H.to_submonoid.has_one
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits an inverse. -/
@[to_additive "A `add_subgroup` of a `add_group` inherits an inverse."]
instance has_inv : has_inv H := ⟨λ a, ⟨a⁻¹, H.inv_mem a.2⟩⟩
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a division -/
@[to_additive "An `add_subgroup` of an `add_group` inherits a subtraction."]
instance has_div : has_div H := ⟨λ a b, ⟨a / b, H.div_mem a.2 b.2⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast, to_additive] lemma coe_mul (x y : H) : (↑(x * y) : G) = ↑x * ↑y := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast, to_additive] lemma coe_one : ((1 : H) : G) = 1 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast, to_additive] lemma coe_inv (x : H) : ↑(x⁻¹ : H) = (x⁻¹ : G) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast, to_additive] lemma coe_div (x y : H) : (↑(x / y) : G) = ↑x / ↑y := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast, to_additive] lemma coe_mk (x : G) (hx : x ∈ H) : ((⟨x, hx⟩ : H) : G) = x := rfl
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a group structure. -/
@[to_additive "An `add_subgroup` of an `add_group` inherits an `add_group` structure."]
instance to_group {G : Type*} [group G] (H : subgroup G) : group H :=
subtype.coe_injective.group _ rfl (λ _ _, rfl) (λ _, rfl) (λ _ _, rfl)
/-- A subgroup of a `comm_group` is a `comm_group`. -/
@[to_additive "An `add_subgroup` of an `add_comm_group` is an `add_comm_group`."]
instance to_comm_group {G : Type*} [comm_group G] (H : subgroup G) : comm_group H :=
subtype.coe_injective.comm_group _ rfl (λ _ _, rfl) (λ _, rfl) (λ _ _, rfl)
/-- A subgroup of an `ordered_comm_group` is an `ordered_comm_group`. -/
@[to_additive "An `add_subgroup` of an `add_ordered_comm_group` is an `add_ordered_comm_group`."]
instance to_ordered_comm_group {G : Type*} [ordered_comm_group G] (H : subgroup G) :
ordered_comm_group H :=
subtype.coe_injective.ordered_comm_group _ rfl (λ _ _, rfl) (λ _, rfl) (λ _ _, rfl)
/-- A subgroup of a `linear_ordered_comm_group` is a `linear_ordered_comm_group`. -/
@[to_additive "An `add_subgroup` of a `linear_ordered_add_comm_group` is a
`linear_ordered_add_comm_group`."]
instance to_linear_ordered_comm_group {G : Type*} [linear_ordered_comm_group G]
(H : subgroup G) : linear_ordered_comm_group H :=
subtype.coe_injective.linear_ordered_comm_group _ rfl (λ _ _, rfl) (λ _, rfl) (λ _ _, rfl)
/-- The natural group hom from a subgroup of group `G` to `G`. -/
@[to_additive "The natural group hom from an `add_subgroup` of `add_group` `G` to `G`."]
def subtype : H →* G := ⟨coe, rfl, λ _ _, rfl⟩
@[simp, to_additive] theorem coe_subtype : ⇑H.subtype = coe := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast, to_additive coe_smul]
lemma coe_pow (x : H) (n : ℕ) : ((x ^ n : H) : G) = x ^ n :=
coe_subtype H ▸ monoid_hom.map_pow _ _ _
@[simp, norm_cast, to_additive] lemma coe_zpow (x : H) (n : ℤ) : ((x ^ n : H) : G) = x ^ n :=
coe_subtype H ▸ monoid_hom.map_zpow _ _ _
/-- The inclusion homomorphism from a subgroup `H` contained in `K` to `K`. -/
@[to_additive "The inclusion homomorphism from a additive subgroup `H` contained in `K` to `K`."]
def inclusion {H K : subgroup G} (h : H ≤ K) : H →* K :=
monoid_hom.mk' (λ x, ⟨x, h x.prop⟩) (λ ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩, rfl)
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma coe_inclusion {H K : subgroup G} {h : H ≤ K} (a : H) : (inclusion h a : G) = a :=
by { cases a, simp only [inclusion, coe_mk, monoid_hom.mk'_apply] }
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma subtype_comp_inclusion {H K : subgroup G} (hH : H ≤ K) :
K.subtype.comp (inclusion hH) = H.subtype :=
by { ext, simp }
/-- The subgroup `G` of the group `G`. -/
@[to_additive "The `add_subgroup G` of the `add_group G`."]
instance : has_top (subgroup G) :=
⟨{ inv_mem' := λ _ _, set.mem_univ _ , .. (⊤ : submonoid G) }⟩
/-- The trivial subgroup `{1}` of an group `G`. -/
@[to_additive "The trivial `add_subgroup` `{0}` of an `add_group` `G`."]
instance : has_bot (subgroup G) :=
⟨{ inv_mem' := λ _, by simp *, .. (⊥ : submonoid G) }⟩
@[to_additive]
instance : inhabited (subgroup G) := ⟨⊥⟩
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mem_bot {x : G} : x ∈ (⊥ : subgroup G) ↔ x = 1 := iff.rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mem_top (x : G) : x ∈ (⊤ : subgroup G) := set.mem_univ x
@[simp, to_additive] lemma coe_top : ((⊤ : subgroup G) : set G) = set.univ := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma coe_bot : ((⊥ : subgroup G) : set G) = {1} := rfl
@[to_additive] instance : unique (⊥ : subgroup G) := ⟨⟨1⟩, λ g, subtype.ext g.2⟩
@[to_additive] lemma eq_bot_iff_forall : H = ⊥ ↔ ∀ x ∈ H, x = (1 : G) :=
begin
rw set_like.ext'_iff,
simp only [coe_bot, set.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem, set_like.mem_coe, H.one_mem, true_and],
end
@[to_additive] lemma eq_bot_of_subsingleton [subsingleton H] : H = ⊥ :=
begin
rw subgroup.eq_bot_iff_forall,
intros y hy,
rw [← subgroup.coe_mk H y hy, subsingleton.elim (⟨y, hy⟩ : H) 1, subgroup.coe_one],
end
@[to_additive] lemma coe_eq_univ {H : subgroup G} : (H : set G) = set.univ ↔ H = ⊤ :=
(set_like.ext'_iff.trans (by refl)).symm
@[to_additive] lemma coe_eq_singleton {H : subgroup G} : (∃ g : G, (H : set G) = {g}) ↔ H = ⊥ :=
⟨λ ⟨g, hg⟩, by { haveI : subsingleton (H : set G) := by { rw hg, apply_instance },
exact H.eq_bot_of_subsingleton }, λ h, ⟨1, set_like.ext'_iff.mp h⟩⟩
@[to_additive] instance fintype_bot : fintype (⊥ : subgroup G) := ⟨{1},
by {rintro ⟨x, ⟨hx⟩⟩, exact finset.mem_singleton_self _}⟩
/- curly brackets `{}` are used here instead of instance brackets `[]` because
the instance in a goal is often not the same as the one inferred by type class inference. -/
@[simp, to_additive] lemma card_bot {_ : fintype ↥(⊥ : subgroup G)} :
fintype.card (⊥ : subgroup G) = 1 :=
fintype.card_eq_one_iff.2
⟨⟨(1 : G), set.mem_singleton 1⟩, λ ⟨y, hy⟩, subtype.eq $ subgroup.mem_bot.1 hy⟩
@[to_additive] lemma eq_top_of_card_eq [fintype H] [fintype G]
(h : fintype.card H = fintype.card G) : H = ⊤ :=
begin
haveI : fintype (H : set G) := ‹fintype H›,
rw [set_like.ext'_iff, coe_top, ← finset.coe_univ, ← (H : set G).coe_to_finset, finset.coe_inj,
← finset.card_eq_iff_eq_univ, ← h, set.to_finset_card],
congr
end
@[to_additive] lemma eq_top_of_le_card [fintype H] [fintype G]
(h : fintype.card G ≤ fintype.card H) : H = ⊤ :=
eq_top_of_card_eq H (le_antisymm (fintype.card_le_of_injective coe subtype.coe_injective) h)
@[to_additive] lemma eq_bot_of_card_le [fintype H] (h : fintype.card H ≤ 1) : H = ⊥ :=
let _ := fintype.card_le_one_iff_subsingleton.mp h in by exactI eq_bot_of_subsingleton H
@[to_additive] lemma eq_bot_of_card_eq [fintype H] (h : fintype.card H = 1) : H = ⊥ :=
H.eq_bot_of_card_le (le_of_eq h)
@[to_additive] lemma nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_one (H : subgroup G) :
nontrivial H ↔ ∃ x ∈ H, x ≠ (1:G) :=
subtype.nontrivial_iff_exists_ne (λ x, x ∈ H) (1 : H)
/-- A subgroup is either the trivial subgroup or nontrivial. -/
@[to_additive] lemma bot_or_nontrivial (H : subgroup G) : H = ⊥ ∨ nontrivial H :=
begin
classical,
by_cases h : ∀ x ∈ H, x = (1 : G),
{ left,
exact H.eq_bot_iff_forall.mpr h },
{ right,
simp only [not_forall] at h,
simpa only [nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_one] }
end
/-- A subgroup is either the trivial subgroup or contains a nonzero element. -/
@[to_additive] lemma bot_or_exists_ne_one (H : subgroup G) : H = ⊥ ∨ ∃ x ∈ H, x ≠ (1:G) :=
begin
convert H.bot_or_nontrivial,
rw nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_one
end
@[to_additive] lemma card_le_one_iff_eq_bot [fintype H] : fintype.card H ≤ 1 ↔ H = ⊥ :=
⟨λ h, (eq_bot_iff_forall _).2
(λ x hx, by simpa [subtype.ext_iff] using fintype.card_le_one_iff.1 h ⟨x, hx⟩ 1),
λ h, by simp [h]⟩
@[to_additive] lemma one_lt_card_iff_ne_bot [fintype H] : 1 < fintype.card H ↔ H ≠ ⊥ :=
lt_iff_not_ge'.trans (not_iff_not.mpr H.card_le_one_iff_eq_bot)
/-- The inf of two subgroups is their intersection. -/
@[to_additive "The inf of two `add_subgroups`s is their intersection."]
instance : has_inf (subgroup G) :=
⟨λ H₁ H₂,
{ inv_mem' := λ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩, ⟨H₁.inv_mem hx, H₂.inv_mem hx'⟩,
.. H₁.to_submonoid ⊓ H₂.to_submonoid }⟩
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma coe_inf (p p' : subgroup G) : ((p ⊓ p' : subgroup G) : set G) = p ∩ p' := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma mem_inf {p p' : subgroup G} {x : G} : x ∈ p ⊓ p' ↔ x ∈ p ∧ x ∈ p' := iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
instance : has_Inf (subgroup G) :=
⟨λ s,
{ inv_mem' := λ x hx, set.mem_bInter $ λ i h, i.inv_mem (by apply set.mem_bInter_iff.1 hx i h),
.. (⨅ S ∈ s, subgroup.to_submonoid S).copy (⋂ S ∈ s, ↑S) (by simp) }⟩
@[simp, norm_cast, to_additive]
lemma coe_Inf (H : set (subgroup G)) : ((Inf H : subgroup G) : set G) = ⋂ s ∈ H, ↑s := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma mem_Inf {S : set (subgroup G)} {x : G} : x ∈ Inf S ↔ ∀ p ∈ S, x ∈ p := set.mem_bInter_iff
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_infi {ι : Sort*} {S : ι → subgroup G} {x : G} : (x ∈ ⨅ i, S i) ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ S i :=
by simp only [infi, mem_Inf, set.forall_range_iff]
@[simp, norm_cast, to_additive]
lemma coe_infi {ι : Sort*} {S : ι → subgroup G} : (↑(⨅ i, S i) : set G) = ⋂ i, S i :=
by simp only [infi, coe_Inf, set.bInter_range]
/-- Subgroups of a group form a complete lattice. -/
@[to_additive "The `add_subgroup`s of an `add_group` form a complete lattice."]
instance : complete_lattice (subgroup G) :=
{ bot := (⊥),
bot_le := λ S x hx, (mem_bot.1 hx).symm ▸ S.one_mem,
top := (⊤),
le_top := λ S x hx, mem_top x,
inf := (⊓),
le_inf := λ a b c ha hb x hx, ⟨ha hx, hb hx⟩,
inf_le_left := λ a b x, and.left,
inf_le_right := λ a b x, and.right,
.. complete_lattice_of_Inf (subgroup G) $ λ s, is_glb.of_image
(λ H K, show (H : set G) ≤ K ↔ H ≤ K, from set_like.coe_subset_coe) is_glb_binfi }
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_sup_left {S T : subgroup G} : ∀ {x : G}, x ∈ S → x ∈ S ⊔ T :=
show S ≤ S ⊔ T, from le_sup_left
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_sup_right {S T : subgroup G} : ∀ {x : G}, x ∈ T → x ∈ S ⊔ T :=
show T ≤ S ⊔ T, from le_sup_right
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_mem_sup {S T : subgroup G} {x y : G} (hx : x ∈ S) (hy : y ∈ T) : x * y ∈ S ⊔ T :=
(S ⊔ T).mul_mem (mem_sup_left hx) (mem_sup_right hy)
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_supr_of_mem {ι : Type*} {S : ι → subgroup G} (i : ι) :
∀ {x : G}, x ∈ S i → x ∈ supr S :=
show S i ≤ supr S, from le_supr _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_Sup_of_mem {S : set (subgroup G)} {s : subgroup G}
(hs : s ∈ S) : ∀ {x : G}, x ∈ s → x ∈ Sup S :=
show s ≤ Sup S, from le_Sup hs
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma subsingleton_iff : subsingleton (subgroup G) ↔ subsingleton G :=
⟨ λ h, by exactI ⟨λ x y,
have ∀ i : G, i = 1 := λ i, mem_bot.mp $ subsingleton.elim (⊤ : subgroup G) ⊥ ▸ mem_top i,
(this x).trans (this y).symm⟩,
λ h, by exactI ⟨λ x y, subgroup.ext $ λ i, subsingleton.elim 1 i ▸ by simp [subgroup.one_mem]⟩⟩
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma nontrivial_iff : nontrivial (subgroup G) ↔ nontrivial G :=
not_iff_not.mp (
(not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton.trans subsingleton_iff).trans
not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton.symm)
@[to_additive]
instance [subsingleton G] : unique (subgroup G) :=
⟨⟨⊥⟩, λ a, @subsingleton.elim _ (subsingleton_iff.mpr ‹_›) a _⟩
@[to_additive]
instance [nontrivial G] : nontrivial (subgroup G) := nontrivial_iff.mpr ‹_›
@[to_additive] lemma eq_top_iff' : H = ⊤ ↔ ∀ x : G, x ∈ H :=
eq_top_iff.trans ⟨λ h m, h $ mem_top m, λ h m _, h m⟩
/-- The `subgroup` generated by a set. -/
@[to_additive "The `add_subgroup` generated by a set"]
def closure (k : set G) : subgroup G := Inf {K | k ⊆ K}
variable {k : set G}
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_closure {x : G} : x ∈ closure k ↔ ∀ K : subgroup G, k ⊆ K → x ∈ K :=
mem_Inf
/-- The subgroup generated by a set includes the set. -/
@[simp, to_additive "The `add_subgroup` generated by a set includes the set."]
lemma subset_closure : k ⊆ closure k := λ x hx, mem_closure.2 $ λ K hK, hK hx
@[to_additive]
lemma not_mem_of_not_mem_closure {P : G} (hP : P ∉ closure k) : P ∉ k := λ h, hP (subset_closure h)
open set
/-- A subgroup `K` includes `closure k` if and only if it includes `k`. -/
@[simp, to_additive "An additive subgroup `K` includes `closure k` if and only if it includes `k`"]
lemma closure_le : closure k ≤ K ↔ k ⊆ K :=
⟨subset.trans subset_closure, λ h, Inf_le h⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma closure_eq_of_le (h₁ : k ⊆ K) (h₂ : K ≤ closure k) : closure k = K :=
le_antisymm ((closure_le $ K).2 h₁) h₂
/-- An induction principle for closure membership. If `p` holds for `1` and all elements of `k`, and
is preserved under multiplication and inverse, then `p` holds for all elements of the closure
of `k`. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator, to_additive "An induction principle for additive closure membership. If `p`
holds for `0` and all elements of `k`, and is preserved under addition and inverses, then `p` holds
for all elements of the additive closure of `k`."]
lemma closure_induction {p : G → Prop} {x} (h : x ∈ closure k)
(Hk : ∀ x ∈ k, p x) (H1 : p 1)
(Hmul : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y))
(Hinv : ∀ x, p x → p x⁻¹) : p x :=
(@closure_le _ _ ⟨p, H1, Hmul, Hinv⟩ _).2 Hk h
/-- An induction principle on elements of the subtype `subgroup.closure`.
If `p` holds for `1` and all elements of `k`, and is preserved under multiplication and inverse,
then `p` holds for all elements `x : closure k`.
The difference with `subgroup.closure_induction` is that this acts on the subtype.
-/
@[elab_as_eliminator, to_additive "An induction principle on elements of the subtype
`add_subgroup.closure`. If `p` holds for `0` and all elements of `k`, and is preserved under
addition and negation, then `p` holds for all elements `x : closure k`.
The difference with `add_subgroup.closure_induction` is that this acts on the subtype."]
lemma closure_induction' (k : set G) {p : closure k → Prop}
(Hk : ∀ x (h : x ∈ k), p ⟨x, subset_closure h⟩)
(H1 : p 1)
(Hmul : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y))
(Hinv : ∀ x, p x → p x⁻¹)
(x : closure k) :
p x :=
subtype.rec_on x $ λ x hx, begin
refine exists.elim _ (λ (hx : x ∈ closure k) (hc : p ⟨x, hx⟩), hc),
exact closure_induction hx
(λ x hx, ⟨subset_closure hx, Hk x hx⟩)
⟨one_mem _, H1⟩
(λ x y hx hy, exists.elim hx $ λ hx' hx, exists.elim hy $ λ hy' hy,
⟨mul_mem _ hx' hy', Hmul _ _ hx hy⟩)
(λ x hx, exists.elim hx $ λ hx' hx, ⟨inv_mem _ hx', Hinv _ hx⟩),
end
variable (G)
/-- `closure` forms a Galois insertion with the coercion to set. -/
@[to_additive "`closure` forms a Galois insertion with the coercion to set."]
protected def gi : galois_insertion (@closure G _) coe :=
{ choice := λ s _, closure s,
gc := λ s t, @closure_le _ _ t s,
le_l_u := λ s, subset_closure,
choice_eq := λ s h, rfl }
variable {G}
/-- Subgroup closure of a set is monotone in its argument: if `h ⊆ k`,
then `closure h ≤ closure k`. -/
@[to_additive "Additive subgroup closure of a set is monotone in its argument: if `h ⊆ k`,
then `closure h ≤ closure k`"]
lemma closure_mono ⦃h k : set G⦄ (h' : h ⊆ k) : closure h ≤ closure k :=
(subgroup.gi G).gc.monotone_l h'
/-- Closure of a subgroup `K` equals `K`. -/
@[simp, to_additive "Additive closure of an additive subgroup `K` equals `K`"]
lemma closure_eq : closure (K : set G) = K := (subgroup.gi G).l_u_eq K
@[simp, to_additive] lemma closure_empty : closure (∅ : set G) = ⊥ :=
(subgroup.gi G).gc.l_bot
@[simp, to_additive] lemma closure_univ : closure (univ : set G) = ⊤ :=
@coe_top G _ ▸ closure_eq ⊤
@[to_additive]
lemma closure_union (s t : set G) : closure (s ∪ t) = closure s ⊔ closure t :=
(subgroup.gi G).gc.l_sup
@[to_additive]
lemma closure_Union {ι} (s : ι → set G) : closure (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, closure (s i) :=
(subgroup.gi G).gc.l_supr
@[to_additive]
lemma closure_eq_bot_iff (G : Type*) [group G] (S : set G) :
closure S = ⊥ ↔ S ⊆ {1} :=
by { rw [← le_bot_iff], exact closure_le _}
/-- The subgroup generated by an element of a group equals the set of integer number powers of
the element. -/
@[to_additive /-"The `add_subgroup` generated by an element of an `add_group` equals the set of
natural number multiples of the element."-/]
lemma mem_closure_singleton {x y : G} : y ∈ closure ({x} : set G) ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, x ^ n = y :=
begin
refine ⟨λ hy, closure_induction hy _ _ _ _,
λ ⟨n, hn⟩, hn ▸ zpow_mem _ (subset_closure $ mem_singleton x) n⟩,
{ intros y hy,
rw [eq_of_mem_singleton hy],
exact ⟨1, zpow_one x⟩ },
{ exact ⟨0, zpow_zero x⟩ },
{ rintros _ _ ⟨n, rfl⟩ ⟨m, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨n + m, zpow_add x n m⟩ },
rintros _ ⟨n, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨-n, zpow_neg x n⟩
end
@[to_additive]
lemma closure_singleton_one : closure ({1} : set G) = ⊥ :=
by simp [eq_bot_iff_forall, mem_closure_singleton]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma inv_subset_closure (S : set G) : S⁻¹ ⊆ closure S :=
begin
intros s hs,
rw [set_like.mem_coe, ←subgroup.inv_mem_iff],
exact subset_closure (mem_inv.mp hs),
end
@[simp, to_additive] lemma closure_inv (S : set G) : closure S⁻¹ = closure S :=
begin
refine le_antisymm ((subgroup.closure_le _).2 _) ((subgroup.closure_le _).2 _),
{ exact inv_subset_closure S },
{ simpa only [set.inv_inv] using inv_subset_closure S⁻¹ },
end
@[to_additive]
lemma closure_to_submonoid (S : set G) :
(closure S).to_submonoid = submonoid.closure (S ∪ S⁻¹) :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ (submonoid.closure_le.2 _),
{ intros x hx,
refine closure_induction hx (λ x hx, submonoid.closure_mono (subset_union_left S S⁻¹)
(submonoid.subset_closure hx)) (submonoid.one_mem _) (λ x y hx hy, submonoid.mul_mem _ hx hy)
(λ x hx, _),
rwa [←submonoid.mem_closure_inv, set.union_inv, set.inv_inv, set.union_comm] },
{ simp only [true_and, coe_to_submonoid, union_subset_iff, subset_closure, inv_subset_closure] }
end
/-- An induction principle for closure membership. If `p` holds for `1` and all elements of
`k` and their inverse, and is preserved under multiplication, then `p` holds for all elements of
the closure of `k`. -/
@[to_additive "An induction principle for additive closure membership. If `p` holds for `0` and all
elements of `k` and their negation, and is preserved under addition, then `p` holds for all
elements of the additive closure of `k`."]
lemma closure_induction'' {p : G → Prop} {x} (h : x ∈ closure k)
(Hk : ∀ x ∈ k, p x) (Hk_inv : ∀ x ∈ k, p x⁻¹) (H1 : p 1)
(Hmul : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y)) : p x :=
begin
rw [← mem_to_submonoid, closure_to_submonoid k] at h,
refine submonoid.closure_induction h (λ x hx, _) H1 (λ x y hx hy, Hmul x y hx hy),
{ rw [mem_union, mem_inv] at hx,
cases hx with mem invmem,
{ exact Hk x mem },
{ rw [← inv_inv x],
exact Hk_inv _ invmem } },
end
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_supr_of_directed {ι} [hι : nonempty ι] {K : ι → subgroup G} (hK : directed (≤) K)
{x : G} :
x ∈ (supr K : subgroup G) ↔ ∃ i, x ∈ K i :=
begin
refine ⟨_, λ ⟨i, hi⟩, (set_like.le_def.1 $ le_supr K i) hi⟩,
suffices : x ∈ closure (⋃ i, (K i : set G)) → ∃ i, x ∈ K i,
by simpa only [closure_Union, closure_eq (K _)] using this,
refine (λ hx, closure_induction hx (λ _, mem_Union.1) _ _ _),
{ exact hι.elim (λ i, ⟨i, (K i).one_mem⟩) },
{ rintros x y ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩,
rcases hK i j with ⟨k, hki, hkj⟩,
exact ⟨k, (K k).mul_mem (hki hi) (hkj hj)⟩ },
rintros _ ⟨i, hi⟩, exact ⟨i, inv_mem (K i) hi⟩
end
@[to_additive]
lemma coe_supr_of_directed {ι} [nonempty ι] {S : ι → subgroup G} (hS : directed (≤) S) :
((⨆ i, S i : subgroup G) : set G) = ⋃ i, ↑(S i) :=
set.ext $ λ x, by simp [mem_supr_of_directed hS]
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_Sup_of_directed_on {K : set (subgroup G)} (Kne : K.nonempty)
(hK : directed_on (≤) K) {x : G} :
x ∈ Sup K ↔ ∃ s ∈ K, x ∈ s :=
begin
haveI : nonempty K := Kne.to_subtype,
simp only [Sup_eq_supr', mem_supr_of_directed hK.directed_coe, set_coe.exists, subtype.coe_mk]
end
variables {N : Type*} [group N] {P : Type*} [group P]
/-- The preimage of a subgroup along a monoid homomorphism is a subgroup. -/
@[to_additive "The preimage of an `add_subgroup` along an `add_monoid` homomorphism
is an `add_subgroup`."]
def comap {N : Type*} [group N] (f : G →* N)
(H : subgroup N) : subgroup G :=
{ carrier := (f ⁻¹' H),
inv_mem' := λ a ha,
show f a⁻¹ ∈ H, by rw f.map_inv; exact H.inv_mem ha,
.. H.to_submonoid.comap f }
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma coe_comap (K : subgroup N) (f : G →* N) : (K.comap f : set G) = f ⁻¹' K := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma mem_comap {K : subgroup N} {f : G →* N} {x : G} : x ∈ K.comap f ↔ f x ∈ K := iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma comap_mono {f : G →* N} {K K' : subgroup N} : K ≤ K' → comap f K ≤ comap f K' :=
preimage_mono
@[to_additive]
lemma comap_comap (K : subgroup P) (g : N →* P) (f : G →* N) :
(K.comap g).comap f = K.comap (g.comp f) :=
rfl
/-- The image of a subgroup along a monoid homomorphism is a subgroup. -/
@[to_additive "The image of an `add_subgroup` along an `add_monoid` homomorphism
is an `add_subgroup`."]
def map (f : G →* N) (H : subgroup G) : subgroup N :=
{ carrier := (f '' H),
inv_mem' := by { rintros _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩, exact ⟨x⁻¹, H.inv_mem hx, f.map_inv x⟩ },
.. H.to_submonoid.map f }
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma coe_map (f : G →* N) (K : subgroup G) :
(K.map f : set N) = f '' K := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma mem_map {f : G →* N} {K : subgroup G} {y : N} :
y ∈ K.map f ↔ ∃ x ∈ K, f x = y :=
mem_image_iff_bex
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_map_of_mem (f : G →* N) {K : subgroup G} {x : G} (hx : x ∈ K) : f x ∈ K.map f :=
mem_image_of_mem f hx
@[to_additive]
lemma apply_coe_mem_map (f : G →* N) (K : subgroup G) (x : K) : f x ∈ K.map f :=
mem_map_of_mem f x.prop
@[to_additive]
lemma map_mono {f : G →* N} {K K' : subgroup G} : K ≤ K' → map f K ≤ map f K' :=
image_subset _
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma map_id : K.map (monoid_hom.id G) = K :=
set_like.coe_injective $ image_id _
@[to_additive]
lemma map_map (g : N →* P) (f : G →* N) : (K.map f).map g = K.map (g.comp f) :=
set_like.coe_injective $ image_image _ _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_map_equiv {f : G ≃* N} {K : subgroup G} {x : N} :
x ∈ K.map f.to_monoid_hom ↔ f.symm x ∈ K :=
@set.mem_image_equiv _ _ ↑K f.to_equiv x
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_map_iff_mem {f : G →* N} (hf : function.injective f) {K : subgroup G} {x : G} :
f x ∈ K.map f ↔ x ∈ K :=
hf.mem_set_image
@[to_additive]
lemma map_equiv_eq_comap_symm (f : G ≃* N) (K : subgroup G) :
K.map f.to_monoid_hom = K.comap f.symm.to_monoid_hom :=
set_like.coe_injective (f.to_equiv.image_eq_preimage K)
@[to_additive]
lemma comap_equiv_eq_map_symm (f : N ≃* G) (K : subgroup G) :
K.comap f.to_monoid_hom = K.map f.symm.to_monoid_hom :=
(map_equiv_eq_comap_symm f.symm K).symm
@[to_additive]
lemma map_le_iff_le_comap {f : G →* N} {K : subgroup G} {H : subgroup N} :
K.map f ≤ H ↔ K ≤ H.comap f :=
image_subset_iff
@[to_additive]
lemma gc_map_comap (f : G →* N) : galois_connection (map f) (comap f) :=
λ _ _, map_le_iff_le_comap
@[to_additive]
lemma map_sup (H K : subgroup G) (f : G →* N) : (H ⊔ K).map f = H.map f ⊔ K.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_sup
@[to_additive]
lemma map_supr {ι : Sort*} (f : G →* N) (s : ι → subgroup G) :
(supr s).map f = ⨆ i, (s i).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_supr
@[to_additive] lemma comap_sup_comap_le
(H K : subgroup N) (f : G →* N) : comap f H ⊔ comap f K ≤ comap f (H ⊔ K) :=
monotone.le_map_sup (λ _ _, comap_mono) H K
@[to_additive] lemma supr_comap_le {ι : Sort*} (f : G →* N) (s : ι → subgroup N) :
(⨆ i, (s i).comap f) ≤ (supr s).comap f :=
monotone.le_map_supr (λ _ _, comap_mono)
@[to_additive]
lemma comap_inf (H K : subgroup N) (f : G →* N) : (H ⊓ K).comap f = H.comap f ⊓ K.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_inf
@[to_additive]
lemma comap_infi {ι : Sort*} (f : G →* N) (s : ι → subgroup N) :
(infi s).comap f = ⨅ i, (s i).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_infi
@[to_additive] lemma map_inf_le (H K : subgroup G) (f : G →* N) :
map f (H ⊓ K) ≤ map f H ⊓ map f K :=
le_inf (map_mono inf_le_left) (map_mono inf_le_right)
@[to_additive] lemma map_inf_eq (H K : subgroup G) (f : G →* N) (hf : function.injective f) :
map f (H ⊓ K) = map f H ⊓ map f K :=
begin
rw ← set_like.coe_set_eq,
simp [set.image_inter hf],
end
@[simp, to_additive] lemma map_bot (f : G →* N) : (⊥ : subgroup G).map f = ⊥ :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_bot
@[simp, to_additive] lemma comap_top (f : G →* N) : (⊤ : subgroup N).comap f = ⊤ :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_top
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma comap_subtype_inf_left {H K : subgroup G} : comap H.subtype (H ⊓ K) = comap H.subtype K :=
ext $ λ x, and_iff_right_of_imp (λ _, x.prop)
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma comap_subtype_inf_right {H K : subgroup G} : comap K.subtype (H ⊓ K) = comap K.subtype H :=
ext $ λ x, and_iff_left_of_imp (λ _, x.prop)
/-- If `H ≤ K`, then `H` as a subgroup of `K` is isomorphic to `H`. -/
@[to_additive "If `H ≤ K`, then `H` as a subgroup of `K` is isomorphic to `H`.", simps]
def comap_subtype_equiv_of_le {G : Type*} [group G] {H K : subgroup G} (h : H ≤ K) :
H.comap K.subtype ≃* H :=
{ to_fun := λ g, ⟨g.1, g.2⟩,
inv_fun := λ g, ⟨⟨g.1, h g.2⟩, g.2⟩,
left_inv := λ g, subtype.ext (subtype.ext rfl),
right_inv := λ g, subtype.ext rfl,
map_mul' := λ g h, rfl }
/-- For any subgroups `H` and `K`, view `H ⊓ K` as a subgroup of `K`. -/
@[to_additive "For any subgroups `H` and `K`, view `H ⊓ K` as a subgroup of `K`."]
def subgroup_of (H K : subgroup G) : subgroup K := H.comap K.subtype
@[to_additive] lemma coe_subgroup_of (H K : subgroup G) :
(H.subgroup_of K : set K) = K.subtype ⁻¹' H := rfl
@[to_additive] lemma mem_subgroup_of {H K : subgroup G} {h : K} :
h ∈ H.subgroup_of K ↔ (h : G) ∈ H :=
iff.rfl
@[to_additive] lemma subgroup_of_map_subtype (H K : subgroup G) :
(H.subgroup_of K).map K.subtype = H ⊓ K := set_like.ext'
begin
convert set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range,
simp only [subtype.range_coe_subtype, coe_subtype, coe_inf],
refl,
end
@[simp, to_additive] lemma bot_subgroup_of : (⊥ : subgroup G).subgroup_of H = ⊥ :=
eq.symm (subgroup.ext (λ g, subtype.ext_iff))
@[simp, to_additive] lemma top_subgroup_of : (⊤ : subgroup G).subgroup_of H = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[to_additive] lemma subgroup_of_bot_eq_bot : H.subgroup_of ⊥ = ⊥ :=
subsingleton.elim _ _
@[to_additive] lemma subgroup_of_bot_eq_top : H.subgroup_of ⊥ = ⊤ :=
subsingleton.elim _ _
@[simp, to_additive] lemma subgroup_of_self : H.subgroup_of H = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.mp (λ g hg, g.2)
/-- Given `subgroup`s `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K` as a subgroup of `G × N`. -/
@[to_additive prod "Given `add_subgroup`s `H`, `K` of `add_group`s `A`, `B` respectively, `H × K`
as an `add_subgroup` of `A × B`."]
def prod (H : subgroup G) (K : subgroup N) : subgroup (G × N) :=
{ inv_mem' := λ _ hx, ⟨H.inv_mem' hx.1, K.inv_mem' hx.2⟩,
.. submonoid.prod H.to_submonoid K.to_submonoid}
@[to_additive coe_prod]
lemma coe_prod (H : subgroup G) (K : subgroup N) :
(H.prod K : set (G × N)) = (H : set G).prod (K : set N) := rfl
@[to_additive mem_prod]
lemma mem_prod {H : subgroup G} {K : subgroup N} {p : G × N} :
p ∈ H.prod K ↔ p.1 ∈ H ∧ p.2 ∈ K := iff.rfl
@[to_additive prod_mono]
lemma prod_mono : ((≤) ⇒ (≤) ⇒ (≤)) (@prod G _ N _) (@prod G _ N _) :=
λ s s' hs t t' ht, set.prod_mono hs ht
@[to_additive prod_mono_right]
lemma prod_mono_right (K : subgroup G) : monotone (λ t : subgroup N, K.prod t) :=
prod_mono (le_refl K)
@[to_additive prod_mono_left]
lemma prod_mono_left (H : subgroup N) : monotone (λ K : subgroup G, K.prod H) :=
λ s₁ s₂ hs, prod_mono hs (le_refl H)
@[to_additive prod_top]
lemma prod_top (K : subgroup G) :
K.prod (⊤ : subgroup N) = K.comap (monoid_hom.fst G N) :=
ext $ λ x, by simp [mem_prod, monoid_hom.coe_fst]
@[to_additive top_prod]
lemma top_prod (H : subgroup N) :
(⊤ : subgroup G).prod H = H.comap (monoid_hom.snd G N) :=
ext $ λ x, by simp [mem_prod, monoid_hom.coe_snd]
@[simp, to_additive top_prod_top]
lemma top_prod_top : (⊤ : subgroup G).prod (⊤ : subgroup N) = ⊤ :=
(top_prod _).trans $ comap_top _
@[to_additive] lemma bot_prod_bot : (⊥ : subgroup G).prod (⊥ : subgroup N) = ⊥ :=
set_like.coe_injective $ by simp [coe_prod, prod.one_eq_mk]
/-- Product of subgroups is isomorphic to their product as groups. -/
@[to_additive prod_equiv "Product of additive subgroups is isomorphic to their product
as additive groups"]
def prod_equiv (H : subgroup G) (K : subgroup N) : H.prod K ≃* H × K :=
{ map_mul' := λ x y, rfl, .. equiv.set.prod ↑H ↑K }
/-- A subgroup is normal if whenever `n ∈ H`, then `g * n * g⁻¹ ∈ H` for every `g : G` -/
structure normal : Prop :=
(conj_mem : ∀ n, n ∈ H → ∀ g : G, g * n * g⁻¹ ∈ H)
attribute [class] normal
end subgroup
namespace add_subgroup
/-- An add_subgroup is normal if whenever `n ∈ H`, then `g + n - g ∈ H` for every `g : G` -/
structure normal (H : add_subgroup A) : Prop :=
(conj_mem [] : ∀ n, n ∈ H → ∀ g : A, g + n + -g ∈ H)
attribute [to_additive add_subgroup.normal] subgroup.normal
attribute [class] normal
end add_subgroup
namespace subgroup
variables {H K : subgroup G}
@[priority 100, to_additive]
instance normal_of_comm {G : Type*} [comm_group G] (H : subgroup G) : H.normal :=
⟨by simp [mul_comm, mul_left_comm]⟩
namespace normal
variable (nH : H.normal)
@[to_additive] lemma mem_comm {a b : G} (h : a * b ∈ H) : b * a ∈ H :=
have a⁻¹ * (a * b) * a⁻¹⁻¹ ∈ H, from nH.conj_mem (a * b) h a⁻¹, by simpa
@[to_additive] lemma mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a * b ∈ H ↔ b * a ∈ H :=
⟨nH.mem_comm, nH.mem_comm⟩
end normal
variables (H)
/-- A subgroup is characteristic if it is fixed by all automorphisms.
Several equivalent conditions are provided by lemmas of the form `characteristic.iff...` -/
structure characteristic : Prop :=
(fixed : ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.to_monoid_hom = H)
attribute [class] characteristic
@[priority 100] instance normal_of_characteristic [h : H.characteristic] : H.normal :=
⟨λ a ha b, (set_like.ext_iff.mp (h.fixed (mul_aut.conj b)) a).mpr ha⟩
end subgroup
namespace add_subgroup
variables (H : add_subgroup A)
/-- A add_subgroup is characteristic if it is fixed by all automorphisms.
Several equivalent conditions are provided by lemmas of the form `characteristic.iff...` -/
structure characteristic : Prop :=
(fixed : ∀ ϕ : A ≃+ A, H.comap ϕ.to_add_monoid_hom = H)
attribute [to_additive add_subgroup.characteristic] subgroup.characteristic
attribute [class] characteristic
@[priority 100] instance normal_of_characteristic [h : H.characteristic] : H.normal :=
⟨λ a ha b, (set_like.ext_iff.mp (h.fixed (add_aut.conj b)) a).mpr ha⟩
end add_subgroup
namespace subgroup
variables {H K : subgroup G}
@[to_additive] lemma characteristic_iff_comap_eq :
H.characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.to_monoid_hom = H :=
⟨characteristic.fixed, characteristic.mk⟩
@[to_additive] lemma characteristic_iff_comap_le :
H.characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.to_monoid_hom ≤ H :=
characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans ⟨λ h ϕ, le_of_eq (h ϕ),
λ h ϕ, le_antisymm (h ϕ) (λ g hg, h ϕ.symm ((congr_arg (∈ H) (ϕ.symm_apply_apply g)).mpr hg))⟩
@[to_additive] lemma characteristic_iff_le_comap :
H.characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H ≤ H.comap ϕ.to_monoid_hom :=
characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans ⟨λ h ϕ, ge_of_eq (h ϕ),
λ h ϕ, le_antisymm (λ g hg, (congr_arg (∈ H) (ϕ.symm_apply_apply g)).mp (h ϕ.symm hg)) (h ϕ)⟩
@[to_additive] lemma characteristic_iff_map_eq :
H.characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.map ϕ.to_monoid_hom = H :=
begin
simp_rw map_equiv_eq_comap_symm,
exact characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans ⟨λ h ϕ, h ϕ.symm, λ h ϕ, h ϕ.symm⟩,
end
@[to_additive] lemma characteristic_iff_map_le :
H.characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.map ϕ.to_monoid_hom ≤ H :=
begin
simp_rw map_equiv_eq_comap_symm,
exact characteristic_iff_comap_le.trans ⟨λ h ϕ, h ϕ.symm, λ h ϕ, h ϕ.symm⟩,
end
@[to_additive] lemma characteristic_iff_le_map :
H.characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H ≤ H.map ϕ.to_monoid_hom :=
begin
simp_rw map_equiv_eq_comap_symm,
exact characteristic_iff_le_comap.trans ⟨λ h ϕ, h ϕ.symm, λ h ϕ, h ϕ.symm⟩,
end
@[to_additive] instance bot_characteristic : characteristic (⊥ : subgroup G) :=
characteristic_iff_le_map.mpr (λ ϕ, bot_le)
@[to_additive] instance top_characteristic : characteristic (⊤ : subgroup G) :=
characteristic_iff_map_le.mpr (λ ϕ, le_top)
variable (G)
/-- The center of a group `G` is the set of elements that commute with everything in `G` -/
@[to_additive "The center of an additive group `G` is the set of elements that commute with
everything in `G`"]
def center : subgroup G :=
{ carrier := set.center G,
inv_mem' := λ a, set.inv_mem_center,
.. submonoid.center G }
@[to_additive]
lemma coe_center : ↑(center G) = set.center G := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma center_to_submonoid : (center G).to_submonoid = submonoid.center G := rfl
variable {G}
@[to_additive] lemma mem_center_iff {z : G} : z ∈ center G ↔ ∀ g, g * z = z * g := iff.rfl
instance decidable_mem_center [decidable_eq G] [fintype G] : decidable_pred (∈ center G) :=
λ _, decidable_of_iff' _ mem_center_iff
@[to_additive] instance center_characteristic : (center G).characteristic :=
begin
refine characteristic_iff_comap_le.mpr (λ ϕ g hg h, _),
rw [←ϕ.injective.eq_iff, ϕ.map_mul, ϕ.map_mul],
exact hg (ϕ h),
end
variables {G} (H)
/-- The `normalizer` of `H` is the largest subgroup of `G` inside which `H` is normal. -/
@[to_additive "The `normalizer` of `H` is the largest subgroup of `G` inside which `H` is normal."]
def normalizer : subgroup G :=
{ carrier := {g : G | ∀ n, n ∈ H ↔ g * n * g⁻¹ ∈ H},
one_mem' := by simp,
mul_mem' := λ a b (ha : ∀ n, n ∈ H ↔ a * n * a⁻¹ ∈ H) (hb : ∀ n, n ∈ H ↔ b * n * b⁻¹ ∈ H) n,
by { rw [hb, ha], simp [mul_assoc] },
inv_mem' := λ a (ha : ∀ n, n ∈ H ↔ a * n * a⁻¹ ∈ H) n,
by { rw [ha (a⁻¹ * n * a⁻¹⁻¹)], simp [mul_assoc] } }
-- variant for sets.
-- TODO should this replace `normalizer`?
/-- The `set_normalizer` of `S` is the subgroup of `G` whose elements satisfy `g*S*g⁻¹=S` -/
@[to_additive "The `set_normalizer` of `S` is the subgroup of `G` whose elements satisfy
`g+S-g=S`."]
def set_normalizer (S : set G) : subgroup G :=
{ carrier := {g : G | ∀ n, n ∈ S ↔ g * n * g⁻¹ ∈ S},
one_mem' := by simp,
mul_mem' := λ a b (ha : ∀ n, n ∈ S ↔ a * n * a⁻¹ ∈ S) (hb : ∀ n, n ∈ S ↔ b * n * b⁻¹ ∈ S) n,
by { rw [hb, ha], simp [mul_assoc] },
inv_mem' := λ a (ha : ∀ n, n ∈ S ↔ a * n * a⁻¹ ∈ S) n,
by { rw [ha (a⁻¹ * n * a⁻¹⁻¹)], simp [mul_assoc] } }
lemma mem_normalizer_fintype {S : set G} [fintype S] {x : G}
(h : ∀ n, n ∈ S → x * n * x⁻¹ ∈ S) : x ∈ subgroup.set_normalizer S :=
by haveI := classical.prop_decidable;
haveI := set.fintype_image S (λ n, x * n * x⁻¹); exact
λ n, ⟨h n, λ h₁,
have heq : (λ n, x * n * x⁻¹) '' S = S := set.eq_of_subset_of_card_le
(λ n ⟨y, hy⟩, hy.2 ▸ h y hy.1) (by rw set.card_image_of_injective S conj_injective),
have x * n * x⁻¹ ∈ (λ n, x * n * x⁻¹) '' S := heq.symm ▸ h₁,
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := this in conj_injective hy.2 ▸ hy.1⟩
variable {H}
@[to_additive] lemma mem_normalizer_iff {g : G} :
g ∈ normalizer H ↔ ∀ n, n ∈ H ↔ g * n * g⁻¹ ∈ H := iff.rfl
@[to_additive] lemma le_normalizer : H ≤ normalizer H :=
λ x xH n, by rw [H.mul_mem_cancel_right (H.inv_mem xH), H.mul_mem_cancel_left xH]
@[priority 100, to_additive]
instance normal_in_normalizer : (H.comap H.normalizer.subtype).normal :=
⟨λ x xH g, by simpa using (g.2 x).1 xH⟩
@[to_additive] lemma normalizer_eq_top : H.normalizer = ⊤ ↔ H.normal :=
eq_top_iff.trans ⟨λ h, ⟨λ a ha b, (h (mem_top b) a).mp ha⟩, λ h a ha b,
⟨λ hb, h.conj_mem b hb a, λ hb, by rwa [h.mem_comm_iff, inv_mul_cancel_left] at hb⟩⟩
open_locale classical
@[to_additive]
lemma le_normalizer_of_normal [hK : (H.comap K.subtype).normal] (HK : H ≤ K) : K ≤ H.normalizer :=
λ x hx y, ⟨λ yH, hK.conj_mem ⟨y, HK yH⟩ yH ⟨x, hx⟩,
λ yH, by simpa [mem_comap, mul_assoc] using
hK.conj_mem ⟨x * y * x⁻¹, HK yH⟩ yH ⟨x⁻¹, K.inv_mem hx⟩⟩
variables {N : Type*} [group N]
/-- The preimage of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the preimage. -/
@[to_additive "The preimage of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the preimage."]
lemma le_normalizer_comap (f : N →* G) :
H.normalizer.comap f ≤ (H.comap f).normalizer :=
λ x, begin
simp only [mem_normalizer_iff, mem_comap],
assume h n,
simp [h (f n)]
end
/-- The image of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the image. -/
@[to_additive "The image of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the image."]
lemma le_normalizer_map (f : G →* N) :
H.normalizer.map f ≤ (H.map f).normalizer :=
λ _, begin
simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, mem_map, exists_imp_distrib, mem_normalizer_iff],
rintros x hx rfl n,
split,
{ rintros ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩,
use [x * y * x⁻¹, (hx y).1 hy],
simp },
{ rintros ⟨y, hyH, hy⟩,
use [x⁻¹ * y * x],
rw [hx],
simp [hy, hyH, mul_assoc] }
end
variable (H)
/-- Commutivity of a subgroup -/
structure is_commutative : Prop :=
(is_comm : _root_.is_commutative H (*))
attribute [class] is_commutative
/-- Commutivity of an additive subgroup -/
structure _root_.add_subgroup.is_commutative (H : add_subgroup A) : Prop :=
(is_comm : _root_.is_commutative H (+))
attribute [to_additive add_subgroup.is_commutative] subgroup.is_commutative
attribute [class] add_subgroup.is_commutative
/-- A commutative subgroup is commutative -/
@[to_additive] instance is_commutative.comm_group [h : H.is_commutative] : comm_group H :=
{ mul_comm := h.is_comm.comm, .. H.to_group }
instance center.is_commutative : (center G).is_commutative :=
⟨⟨λ a b, subtype.ext (b.2 a)⟩⟩
end subgroup
namespace group
variables {s : set G}
/-- Given a set `s`, `conjugates_of_set s` is the set of all conjugates of
the elements of `s`. -/
def conjugates_of_set (s : set G) : set G := ⋃ a ∈ s, conjugates_of a
lemma mem_conjugates_of_set_iff {x : G} : x ∈ conjugates_of_set s ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, is_conj a x :=
set.mem_bUnion_iff
theorem subset_conjugates_of_set : s ⊆ conjugates_of_set s :=
λ (x : G) (h : x ∈ s), mem_conjugates_of_set_iff.2 ⟨x, h, is_conj.refl _⟩
theorem conjugates_of_set_mono {s t : set G} (h : s ⊆ t) :
conjugates_of_set s ⊆ conjugates_of_set t :=
set.bUnion_subset_bUnion_left h
lemma conjugates_subset_normal {N : subgroup G} [tn : N.normal] {a : G} (h : a ∈ N) :
conjugates_of a ⊆ N :=
by { rintros a hc, obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := is_conj_iff.1 hc, exact tn.conj_mem a h c }
theorem conjugates_of_set_subset {s : set G} {N : subgroup G} [N.normal] (h : s ⊆ N) :
conjugates_of_set s ⊆ N :=
set.bUnion_subset (λ x H, conjugates_subset_normal (h H))
/-- The set of conjugates of `s` is closed under conjugation. -/
lemma conj_mem_conjugates_of_set {x c : G} :
x ∈ conjugates_of_set s → (c * x * c⁻¹ ∈ conjugates_of_set s) :=
λ H,
begin
rcases (mem_conjugates_of_set_iff.1 H) with ⟨a,h₁,h₂⟩,
exact mem_conjugates_of_set_iff.2 ⟨a, h₁, h₂.trans (is_conj_iff.2 ⟨c,rfl⟩)⟩,
end
end group
namespace subgroup
open group
variable {s : set G}
/-- The normal closure of a set `s` is the subgroup closure of all the conjugates of
elements of `s`. It is the smallest normal subgroup containing `s`. -/
def normal_closure (s : set G) : subgroup G := closure (conjugates_of_set s)
theorem conjugates_of_set_subset_normal_closure : conjugates_of_set s ⊆ normal_closure s :=
subset_closure
theorem subset_normal_closure : s ⊆ normal_closure s :=
set.subset.trans subset_conjugates_of_set conjugates_of_set_subset_normal_closure
theorem le_normal_closure {H : subgroup G} : H ≤ normal_closure ↑H :=
λ _ h, subset_normal_closure h
/-- The normal closure of `s` is a normal subgroup. -/
instance normal_closure_normal : (normal_closure s).normal :=
⟨λ n h g,
begin
refine subgroup.closure_induction h (λ x hx, _) _ (λ x y ihx ihy, _) (λ x ihx, _),
{ exact (conjugates_of_set_subset_normal_closure (conj_mem_conjugates_of_set hx)) },
{ simpa using (normal_closure s).one_mem },
{ rw ← conj_mul,
exact mul_mem _ ihx ihy },
{ rw ← conj_inv,
exact inv_mem _ ihx }
end⟩
/-- The normal closure of `s` is the smallest normal subgroup containing `s`. -/
theorem normal_closure_le_normal {N : subgroup G} [N.normal]
(h : s ⊆ N) : normal_closure s ≤ N :=
begin
assume a w,
refine closure_induction w (λ x hx, _) _ (λ x y ihx ihy, _) (λ x ihx, _),
{ exact (conjugates_of_set_subset h hx) },
{ exact subgroup.one_mem _ },
{ exact subgroup.mul_mem _ ihx ihy },
{ exact subgroup.inv_mem _ ihx }
end
lemma normal_closure_subset_iff {N : subgroup G} [N.normal] : s ⊆ N ↔ normal_closure s ≤ N :=
⟨normal_closure_le_normal, set.subset.trans (subset_normal_closure)⟩
theorem normal_closure_mono {s t : set G} (h : s ⊆ t) : normal_closure s ≤ normal_closure t :=
normal_closure_le_normal (set.subset.trans h subset_normal_closure)
theorem normal_closure_eq_infi : normal_closure s =
⨅ (N : subgroup G) (_ : normal N) (hs : s ⊆ N), N :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi (λ N, le_infi (λ hN, by exactI le_infi (normal_closure_le_normal))))
(infi_le_of_le (normal_closure s) (infi_le_of_le (by apply_instance)
(infi_le_of_le subset_normal_closure (le_refl _))))
@[simp] theorem normal_closure_eq_self (H : subgroup G) [H.normal] : normal_closure ↑H = H :=
le_antisymm (normal_closure_le_normal rfl.subset) (le_normal_closure)
@[simp] theorem normal_closure_idempotent : normal_closure ↑(normal_closure s) = normal_closure s :=
normal_closure_eq_self _
theorem closure_le_normal_closure {s : set G} : closure s ≤ normal_closure s :=
by simp only [subset_normal_closure, closure_le]
@[simp] theorem normal_closure_closure_eq_normal_closure {s : set G} :
normal_closure ↑(closure s) = normal_closure s :=
le_antisymm (normal_closure_le_normal closure_le_normal_closure)
(normal_closure_mono subset_closure)
/-- The normal core of a subgroup `H` is the largest normal subgroup of `G` contained in `H`,
as shown by `subgroup.normal_core_eq_supr`. -/
def normal_core (H : subgroup G) : subgroup G :=
{ carrier := {a : G | ∀ b : G, b * a * b⁻¹ ∈ H},
one_mem' := λ a, by rw [mul_one, mul_inv_self]; exact H.one_mem,
inv_mem' := λ a h b, (congr_arg (∈ H) conj_inv).mp (H.inv_mem (h b)),
mul_mem' := λ a b ha hb c, (congr_arg (∈ H) conj_mul).mp (H.mul_mem (ha c) (hb c)) }
lemma normal_core_le (H : subgroup G) : H.normal_core ≤ H :=
λ a h, by { rw [←mul_one a, ←one_inv, ←one_mul a], exact h 1 }
instance normal_core_normal (H : subgroup G) : H.normal_core.normal :=
⟨λ a h b c, by rw [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, ←mul_inv_rev, ←mul_assoc, ←mul_assoc]; exact h (c * b)⟩
lemma normal_le_normal_core {H : subgroup G} {N : subgroup G} [hN : N.normal] :
N ≤ H.normal_core ↔ N ≤ H :=
⟨ge_trans H.normal_core_le, λ h_le n hn g, h_le (hN.conj_mem n hn g)⟩
lemma normal_core_mono {H K : subgroup G} (h : H ≤ K) : H.normal_core ≤ K.normal_core :=
normal_le_normal_core.mpr (H.normal_core_le.trans h)
lemma normal_core_eq_supr (H : subgroup G) :
H.normal_core = ⨆ (N : subgroup G) (_ : normal N) (hs : N ≤ H), N :=
le_antisymm (le_supr_of_le H.normal_core
(le_supr_of_le H.normal_core_normal (le_supr_of_le H.normal_core_le le_rfl)))
(supr_le (λ N, supr_le (λ hN, supr_le (by exactI normal_le_normal_core.mpr))))
@[simp] lemma normal_core_eq_self (H : subgroup G) [H.normal] : H.normal_core = H :=
le_antisymm H.normal_core_le (normal_le_normal_core.mpr le_rfl)
@[simp] theorem normal_core_idempotent (H : subgroup G) :
H.normal_core.normal_core = H.normal_core :=
H.normal_core.normal_core_eq_self
end subgroup
namespace monoid_hom
variables {N : Type*} {P : Type*} [group N] [group P] (K : subgroup G)
open subgroup
/-- The range of a monoid homomorphism from a group is a subgroup. -/
@[to_additive "The range of an `add_monoid_hom` from an `add_group` is an `add_subgroup`."]
def range (f : G →* N) : subgroup N :=
subgroup.copy ((⊤ : subgroup G).map f) (set.range f) (by simp [set.ext_iff])
@[to_additive]
instance decidable_mem_range (f : G →* N) [fintype G] [decidable_eq N] :
decidable_pred (∈ f.range) :=
λ x, fintype.decidable_exists_fintype
@[simp, to_additive] lemma coe_range (f : G →* N) :
(f.range : set N) = set.range f := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mem_range {f : G →* N} {y : N} :
y ∈ f.range ↔ ∃ x, f x = y :=
iff.rfl
@[to_additive] lemma range_eq_map (f : G →* N) : f.range = (⊤ : subgroup G).map f :=
by ext; simp
/-- The canonical surjective group homomorphism `G →* f(G)` induced by a group
homomorphism `G →* N`. -/
@[to_additive "The canonical surjective `add_group` homomorphism `G →+ f(G)` induced by a group
homomorphism `G →+ N`."]
def range_restrict (f : G →* N) : G →* f.range :=
monoid_hom.mk' (λ g, ⟨f g, ⟨g, rfl⟩⟩) $ λ a b, by {ext, exact f.map_mul' _ _}
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma coe_range_restrict (f : G →* N) (g : G) : (f.range_restrict g : N) = f g := rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma range_restrict_surjective (f : G →* N) : function.surjective f.range_restrict :=
λ ⟨_, g, rfl⟩, ⟨g, rfl⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma map_range (g : N →* P) (f : G →* N) : f.range.map g = (g.comp f).range :=
by rw [range_eq_map, range_eq_map]; exact (⊤ : subgroup G).map_map g f
@[to_additive]
lemma range_top_iff_surjective {N} [group N] {f : G →* N} :
f.range = (⊤ : subgroup N) ↔ function.surjective f :=
set_like.ext'_iff.trans $ iff.trans (by rw [coe_range, coe_top]) set.range_iff_surjective
/-- The range of a surjective monoid homomorphism is the whole of the codomain. -/
@[to_additive "The range of a surjective `add_monoid` homomorphism is the whole of the codomain."]
lemma range_top_of_surjective {N} [group N] (f : G →* N) (hf : function.surjective f) :
f.range = (⊤ : subgroup N) :=
range_top_iff_surjective.2 hf
@[simp, to_additive] lemma _root_.subgroup.subtype_range (H : subgroup G) : H.subtype.range = H :=
by { rw [range_eq_map, ← set_like.coe_set_eq, coe_map, subgroup.coe_subtype], ext, simp }
@[simp, to_additive] lemma _root_.subgroup.inclusion_range {H K : subgroup G} (h_le : H ≤ K) :
(inclusion h_le).range = H.subgroup_of K :=
subgroup.ext (λ g, set.ext_iff.mp (set.range_inclusion h_le) g)
/-- Restriction of a group hom to a subgroup of the domain. -/
@[to_additive "Restriction of an `add_group` hom to an `add_subgroup` of the domain."]
def restrict (f : G →* N) (H : subgroup G) : H →* N :=
f.comp H.subtype
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma restrict_apply {H : subgroup G} (f : G →* N) (x : H) :
f.restrict H x = f (x : G) := rfl
/-- Restriction of a group hom to a subgroup of the codomain. -/
@[to_additive "Restriction of an `add_group` hom to an `add_subgroup` of the codomain."]
def cod_restrict (f : G →* N) (S : subgroup N) (h : ∀ x, f x ∈ S) : G →* S :=
{ to_fun := λ n, ⟨f n, h n⟩,
map_one' := subtype.eq f.map_one,
map_mul' := λ x y, subtype.eq (f.map_mul x y) }
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma cod_restrict_apply {G : Type*} [group G] {N : Type*} [group N] (f : G →* N)
(S : subgroup N) (h : ∀ (x : G), f x ∈ S) {x : G} :
f.cod_restrict S h x = ⟨f x, h x⟩ := rfl
@[to_additive] lemma subgroup_of_range_eq_of_le {G₁ G₂ : Type*} [group G₁] [group G₂]
{K : subgroup G₂} (f : G₁ →* G₂) (h : f.range ≤ K) :
f.range.subgroup_of K = (f.cod_restrict K (λ x, h ⟨x, rfl⟩)).range :=
begin
ext k,
refine exists_congr _,
simp [subtype.ext_iff],
end
/-- Computable alternative to `monoid_hom.of_injective`. -/
@[to_additive /-"Computable alternative to `add_monoid_hom.of_injective`."-/]
def of_left_inverse {f : G →* N} {g : N →* G} (h : function.left_inverse g f) : G ≃* f.range :=
{ to_fun := f.range_restrict,
inv_fun := g ∘ f.range.subtype,
left_inv := h,
right_inv := by
{ rintros ⟨x, y, rfl⟩,
apply subtype.ext,
rw [coe_range_restrict, function.comp_apply, subgroup.coe_subtype, subtype.coe_mk, h] },
.. f.range_restrict }
@[simp, to_additive] lemma of_left_inverse_apply {f : G →* N} {g : N →* G}
(h : function.left_inverse g f) (x : G) :
↑(of_left_inverse h x) = f x := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma of_left_inverse_symm_apply {f : G →* N} {g : N →* G}
(h : function.left_inverse g f) (x : f.range) :
(of_left_inverse h).symm x = g x := rfl
/-- The range of an injective group homomorphism is isomorphic to its domain. -/
@[to_additive /-"The range of an injective additive group homomorphism is isomorphic to its
domain."-/ ]
noncomputable def of_injective {f : G →* N} (hf : function.injective f) : G ≃* f.range :=
(mul_equiv.of_bijective (f.cod_restrict f.range (λ x, ⟨x, rfl⟩))
⟨λ x y h, hf (subtype.ext_iff.mp h), by { rintros ⟨x, y, rfl⟩, exact ⟨y, rfl⟩ }⟩)
@[to_additive]
lemma of_injective_apply {f : G →* N} (hf : function.injective f) {x : G} :
↑(of_injective hf x) = f x := rfl
section ker
variables {M : Type*} [mul_one_class M]
/-- The multiplicative kernel of a monoid homomorphism is the subgroup of elements `x : G` such that
`f x = 1` -/
@[to_additive "The additive kernel of an `add_monoid` homomorphism is the `add_subgroup` of elements
such that `f x = 0`"]
def ker (f : G →* M) : subgroup G :=
{ inv_mem' := λ x (hx : f x = 1),
calc f x⁻¹ = f x * f x⁻¹ : by rw [hx, one_mul]
... = f (x * x⁻¹) : by rw [f.map_mul]
... = f 1 : by rw [mul_right_inv]
... = 1 : f.map_one,
..f.mker }
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_ker (f : G →* M) {x : G} : x ∈ f.ker ↔ f x = 1 := iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma coe_ker (f : G →* M) : (f.ker : set G) = (f : G → M) ⁻¹' {1} := rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_iff (f : G →* N) {x y : G} : f x = f y ↔ y⁻¹ * x ∈ f.ker :=
by rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_mul, f.map_inv, inv_mul_eq_one, eq_comm]
@[to_additive]
instance decidable_mem_ker [decidable_eq M] (f : G →* M) :
decidable_pred (∈ f.ker) :=
λ x, decidable_of_iff (f x = 1) f.mem_ker
@[to_additive]
lemma comap_ker (g : N →* P) (f : G →* N) : g.ker.comap f = (g.comp f).ker := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma comap_bot (f : G →* N) :
(⊥ : subgroup N).comap f = f.ker := rfl
@[to_additive] lemma range_restrict_ker (f : G →* N) : ker (range_restrict f) = ker f :=
begin
ext,
change (⟨f x, _⟩ : range f) = ⟨1, _⟩ ↔ f x = 1,
simp only [],
end
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma ker_one : (1 : G →* M).ker = ⊤ :=
by { ext, simp [mem_ker] }
@[to_additive] lemma ker_eq_bot_iff (f : G →* N) : f.ker = ⊥ ↔ function.injective f :=
begin
split,
{ intros h x y hxy,
rwa [←mul_inv_eq_one, ←map_inv, ←map_mul, ←mem_ker, h, mem_bot, mul_inv_eq_one] at hxy },
{ exact λ h, le_bot_iff.mp (λ x hx, h (hx.trans f.map_one.symm)) },
end
@[simp, to_additive] lemma _root_.subgroup.ker_subtype (H : subgroup G) : H.subtype.ker = ⊥ :=
H.subtype.ker_eq_bot_iff.mpr subtype.coe_injective
@[simp, to_additive] lemma _root_.subgroup.ker_inclusion {H K : subgroup G} (h : H ≤ K) :
(inclusion h).ker = ⊥ :=
(inclusion h).ker_eq_bot_iff.mpr (set.inclusion_injective h)
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_map_comap_prod {G' : Type*} {N' : Type*} [group G'] [group N']
(f : G →* N) (g : G' →* N') (S : subgroup N) (S' : subgroup N') :
(S.prod S').comap (prod_map f g) = (S.comap f).prod (S'.comap g) :=
set_like.coe_injective $ set.preimage_prod_map_prod f g _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma ker_prod_map {G' : Type*} {N' : Type*} [group G'] [group N'] (f : G →* N) (g : G' →* N') :
(prod_map f g).ker = f.ker.prod g.ker :=
by rw [←comap_bot, ←comap_bot, ←comap_bot, ←prod_map_comap_prod, bot_prod_bot]
end ker
/-- The subgroup of elements `x : G` such that `f x = g x` -/
@[to_additive "The additive subgroup of elements `x : G` such that `f x = g x`"]
def eq_locus (f g : G →* N) : subgroup G :=
{ inv_mem' := λ x (hx : f x = g x), show f x⁻¹ = g x⁻¹, by rw [f.map_inv, g.map_inv, hx],
.. eq_mlocus f g}
/-- If two monoid homomorphisms are equal on a set, then they are equal on its subgroup closure. -/
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_on_closure {f g : G →* N} {s : set G} (h : set.eq_on f g s) :
set.eq_on f g (closure s) :=
show closure s ≤ f.eq_locus g, from (closure_le _).2 h
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_of_eq_on_top {f g : G →* N} (h : set.eq_on f g (⊤ : subgroup G)) :
f = g :=
ext $ λ x, h trivial
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_of_eq_on_dense {s : set G} (hs : closure s = ⊤) {f g : G →* N} (h : s.eq_on f g) :
f = g :=
eq_of_eq_on_top $ hs ▸ eq_on_closure h
@[to_additive]
lemma gclosure_preimage_le (f : G →* N) (s : set N) :
closure (f ⁻¹' s) ≤ (closure s).comap f :=
(closure_le _).2 $ λ x hx, by rw [set_like.mem_coe, mem_comap]; exact subset_closure hx
/-- The image under a monoid homomorphism of the subgroup generated by a set equals the subgroup
generated by the image of the set. -/
@[to_additive "The image under an `add_monoid` hom of the `add_subgroup` generated by a set equals
the `add_subgroup` generated by the image of the set."]
lemma map_closure (f : G →* N) (s : set G) :
(closure s).map f = closure (f '' s) :=
le_antisymm
(map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ le_trans (closure_mono $ set.subset_preimage_image f s)
(gclosure_preimage_le _ _))
((closure_le _).2 $ set.image_subset _ subset_closure)
-- this instance can't go just after the definition of `mrange` because `fintype` is
-- not imported at that stage
/-- The range of a finite monoid under a monoid homomorphism is finite.
Note: this instance can form a diamond with `subtype.fintype` in the
presence of `fintype N`. -/
@[to_additive "The range of a finite additive monoid under an additive monoid homomorphism is
finite.
Note: this instance can form a diamond with `subtype.fintype` or `subgroup.fintype` in the
presence of `fintype N`."]
instance fintype_mrange {M N : Type*} [monoid M] [monoid N] [fintype M] [decidable_eq N]
(f : M →* N) : fintype (mrange f) :=
set.fintype_range f
/-- The range of a finite group under a group homomorphism is finite.
Note: this instance can form a diamond with `subtype.fintype` or `subgroup.fintype` in the
presence of `fintype N`. -/
@[to_additive "The range of a finite additive group under an additive group homomorphism is finite.
Note: this instance can form a diamond with `subtype.fintype` or `subgroup.fintype` in the
presence of `fintype N`."]
instance fintype_range [fintype G] [decidable_eq N] (f : G →* N) : fintype (range f) :=
set.fintype_range f
end monoid_hom
namespace subgroup
variables {N : Type*} [group N] (H : subgroup G)
@[to_additive] lemma map_eq_bot_iff {f : G →* N} : H.map f = ⊥ ↔ H ≤ f.ker :=
begin
rw eq_bot_iff,
split,
{ exact λ h x hx, h ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ },
{ intros h x hx,
obtain ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ := hx,
exact h hy },
end
@[to_additive]
lemma map_eq_bot_iff_of_injective {f : G →* N} (hf : function.injective f) : H.map f = ⊥ ↔ H = ⊥ :=
by rw [map_eq_bot_iff, f.ker_eq_bot_iff.mpr hf, le_bot_iff]
end subgroup
namespace subgroup
open monoid_hom
variables {N : Type*} [group N] (f : G →* N)
@[to_additive]
lemma map_le_range (H : subgroup G) : map f H ≤ f.range :=
(range_eq_map f).symm ▸ map_mono le_top
@[to_additive]
lemma map_subtype_le {H : subgroup G} (K : subgroup H) : K.map H.subtype ≤ H :=
(K.map_le_range H.subtype).trans (le_of_eq H.subtype_range)
@[to_additive]
lemma ker_le_comap (H : subgroup N) : f.ker ≤ comap f H :=
(comap_bot f) ▸ comap_mono bot_le
@[to_additive]
lemma map_comap_le (H : subgroup N) : map f (comap f H) ≤ H :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_le _
@[to_additive]
lemma le_comap_map (H : subgroup G) : H ≤ comap f (map f H) :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u_l _
@[to_additive]
lemma map_comap_eq (H : subgroup N) :
map f (comap f H) = f.range ⊓ H :=
set_like.ext' begin
convert set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range,
simp [set.inter_comm],
end
@[to_additive]
lemma comap_map_eq (H : subgroup G) : comap f (map f H) = H ⊔ f.ker :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ (sup_le (le_comap_map _ _) (ker_le_comap _ _)),
intros x hx, simp only [exists_prop, mem_map, mem_comap] at hx,
rcases hx with ⟨y, hy, hy'⟩,
rw ← mul_inv_cancel_left y x,
exact mul_mem_sup hy (by simp [mem_ker, hy']),
end
@[to_additive]
lemma map_comap_eq_self {f : G →* N} {H : subgroup N} (h : H ≤ f.range) :
map f (comap f H) = H :=
by rwa [map_comap_eq, inf_eq_right]
@[to_additive]
lemma map_comap_eq_self_of_surjective {f : G →* N} (h : function.surjective f) (H : subgroup N) :
map f (comap f H) = H :=
map_comap_eq_self ((range_top_of_surjective _ h).symm ▸ le_top)
@[to_additive]
lemma comap_injective {f : G →* N} (h : function.surjective f) : function.injective (comap f) :=
λ K L hKL, by { apply_fun map f at hKL, simpa [map_comap_eq_self_of_surjective h] using hKL }
@[to_additive]
lemma comap_map_eq_self {f : G →* N} {H : subgroup G} (h : f.ker ≤ H) :
comap f (map f H) = H :=
by rwa [comap_map_eq, sup_eq_left]
@[to_additive]
lemma comap_map_eq_self_of_injective {f : G →* N} (h : function.injective f) (H : subgroup G) :
comap f (map f H) = H :=
comap_map_eq_self (((ker_eq_bot_iff _).mpr h).symm ▸ bot_le)
@[to_additive]
lemma map_injective {f : G →* N} (h : function.injective f) : function.injective (map f) :=
λ K L hKL, by { apply_fun comap f at hKL, simpa [comap_map_eq_self_of_injective h] using hKL }
@[to_additive]
lemma map_eq_comap_of_inverse {f : G →* N} {g : N →* G} (hl : function.left_inverse g f)
(hr : function.right_inverse g f) (H : subgroup G) : map f H = comap g H :=
set_like.ext' $ by rw [coe_map, coe_comap, set.image_eq_preimage_of_inverse hl hr]
/-- Given `f(A) = f(B)`, `ker f ≤ A`, and `ker f ≤ B`, deduce that `A = B` -/
@[to_additive] lemma map_injective_of_ker_le
{H K : subgroup G} (hH : f.ker ≤ H) (hK : f.ker ≤ K) (hf : map f H = map f K) :
H = K :=
begin
apply_fun comap f at hf,
rwa [comap_map_eq, comap_map_eq, sup_of_le_left hH, sup_of_le_left hK] at hf,
end
@[to_additive] lemma comap_sup_eq_of_le_range
{H K : subgroup N} (hH : H ≤ f.range) (hK : K ≤ f.range) :
comap f H ⊔ comap f K = comap f (H ⊔ K) :=
map_injective_of_ker_le f ((ker_le_comap f H).trans le_sup_left) (ker_le_comap f (H ⊔ K))
(by rw [map_comap_eq, map_sup, map_comap_eq, map_comap_eq, inf_eq_right.mpr hH,
inf_eq_right.mpr hK, inf_eq_right.mpr (sup_le hH hK)])
@[to_additive] lemma comap_sup_eq (H K : subgroup N) (hf : function.surjective f) :
comap f H ⊔ comap f K = comap f (H ⊔ K) :=
comap_sup_eq_of_le_range f (le_top.trans (ge_of_eq (f.range_top_of_surjective hf)))
(le_top.trans (ge_of_eq (f.range_top_of_surjective hf)))
@[to_additive] lemma sup_subgroup_of_eq {H K L : subgroup G} (hH : H ≤ L) (hK : K ≤ L) :
H.subgroup_of L ⊔ K.subgroup_of L = (H ⊔ K).subgroup_of L :=
comap_sup_eq_of_le_range L.subtype (hH.trans (ge_of_eq L.subtype_range))
(hK.trans (ge_of_eq L.subtype_range))
/-- A subgroup is isomorphic to its image under an injective function -/
@[to_additive "An additive subgroup is isomorphic to its image under an injective function"]
noncomputable def equiv_map_of_injective (H : subgroup G)
(f : G →* N) (hf : function.injective f) : H ≃* H.map f :=
{ map_mul' := λ _ _, subtype.ext (f.map_mul _ _), ..equiv.set.image f H hf }
@[simp, to_additive] lemma coe_equiv_map_of_injective_apply (H : subgroup G)
(f : G →* N) (hf : function.injective f) (h : H) :
(equiv_map_of_injective H f hf h : N) = f h := rfl
/-- The preimage of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the preimage of a surjective
function. -/
@[to_additive "The preimage of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the preimage of
a surjective function."]
lemma comap_normalizer_eq_of_surjective (H : subgroup G)
{f : N →* G} (hf : function.surjective f) :
H.normalizer.comap f = (H.comap f).normalizer :=
le_antisymm (le_normalizer_comap f)
begin
assume x hx,
simp only [mem_comap, mem_normalizer_iff] at *,
assume n,
rcases hf n with ⟨y, rfl⟩,
simp [hx y]
end
/-- The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of an isomorphism. -/
@[to_additive "The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of an
isomorphism."]
lemma map_equiv_normalizer_eq (H : subgroup G)
(f : G ≃* N) : H.normalizer.map f.to_monoid_hom = (H.map f.to_monoid_hom).normalizer :=
begin
ext x,
simp only [mem_normalizer_iff, mem_map_equiv],
rw [f.to_equiv.forall_congr],
simp
end
/-- The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of a bijective
function. -/
@[to_additive "The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of a bijective
function."]
lemma map_normalizer_eq_of_bijective (H : subgroup G)
{f : G →* N} (hf : function.bijective f) :
H.normalizer.map f = (H.map f).normalizer :=
map_equiv_normalizer_eq H (mul_equiv.of_bijective f hf)
end subgroup
namespace monoid_hom
variables {G₁ G₂ G₃ : Type*} [group G₁] [group G₂] [group G₃]
variables (f : G₁ →* G₂) (f_inv : G₂ → G₁)
/-- Auxiliary definition used to define `lift_of_right_inverse` -/
@[to_additive "Auxiliary definition used to define `lift_of_right_inverse`"]
def lift_of_right_inverse_aux
(hf : function.right_inverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃) (hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) :
G₂ →* G₃ :=
{ to_fun := λ b, g (f_inv b),
map_one' := hg (hf 1),
map_mul' :=
begin
intros x y,
rw [← g.map_mul, ← mul_inv_eq_one, ← g.map_inv, ← g.map_mul, ← g.mem_ker],
apply hg,
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_mul, f.map_inv, mul_inv_eq_one, f.map_mul],
simp only [hf _],
end }
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma lift_of_right_inverse_aux_comp_apply
(hf : function.right_inverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃) (hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (x : G₁) :
(f.lift_of_right_inverse_aux f_inv hf g hg) (f x) = g x :=
begin
dsimp [lift_of_right_inverse_aux],
rw [← mul_inv_eq_one, ← g.map_inv, ← g.map_mul, ← g.mem_ker],
apply hg,
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_mul, f.map_inv, mul_inv_eq_one],
simp only [hf _],
end
/-- `lift_of_right_inverse f hf g hg` is the unique group homomorphism `φ`
* such that `φ.comp f = g` (`monoid_hom.lift_of_right_inverse_comp`),
* where `f : G₁ →+* G₂` has a right_inverse `f_inv` (`hf`),
* and `g : G₂ →+* G₃` satisfies `hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker`.
See `monoid_hom.eq_lift_of_right_inverse` for the uniqueness lemma.
```
G₁.
| \
f | \ g
| \
v \⌟
G₂----> G₃
∃!φ
```
-/
@[to_additive "`lift_of_right_inverse f f_inv hf g hg` is the unique additive group homomorphism `φ`
* such that `φ.comp f = g` (`add_monoid_hom.lift_of_right_inverse_comp`),
* where `f : G₁ →+ G₂` has a right_inverse `f_inv` (`hf`),
* and `g : G₂ →+ G₃` satisfies `hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker`.
See `add_monoid_hom.eq_lift_of_right_inverse` for the uniqueness lemma.
```
G₁.
| \\
f | \\ g
| \\
v \\⌟
G₂----> G₃
∃!φ
```"]
def lift_of_right_inverse
(hf : function.right_inverse f_inv f) : {g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker} ≃ (G₂ →* G₃) :=
{ to_fun := λ g, f.lift_of_right_inverse_aux f_inv hf g.1 g.2,
inv_fun := λ φ, ⟨φ.comp f, λ x hx, (mem_ker _).mpr $ by simp [(mem_ker _).mp hx]⟩,
left_inv := λ g, by {
ext,
simp only [comp_apply, lift_of_right_inverse_aux_comp_apply, subtype.coe_mk,
subtype.val_eq_coe], },
right_inv := λ φ, by {
ext b,
simp [lift_of_right_inverse_aux, hf b], } }
/-- A non-computable version of `monoid_hom.lift_of_right_inverse` for when no computable right
inverse is available, that uses `function.surj_inv`. -/
@[simp, to_additive "A non-computable version of `add_monoid_hom.lift_of_right_inverse` for when no
computable right inverse is available."]
noncomputable abbreviation lift_of_surjective
(hf : function.surjective f) : {g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker} ≃ (G₂ →* G₃) :=
f.lift_of_right_inverse (function.surj_inv hf) (function.right_inverse_surj_inv hf)
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma lift_of_right_inverse_comp_apply
(hf : function.right_inverse f_inv f) (g : {g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker}) (x : G₁) :
(f.lift_of_right_inverse f_inv hf g) (f x) = g x :=
f.lift_of_right_inverse_aux_comp_apply f_inv hf g.1 g.2 x
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma lift_of_right_inverse_comp (hf : function.right_inverse f_inv f)
(g : {g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker}) :
(f.lift_of_right_inverse f_inv hf g).comp f = g :=
monoid_hom.ext $ f.lift_of_right_inverse_comp_apply f_inv hf g
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_lift_of_right_inverse (hf : function.right_inverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃)
(hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (h : G₂ →* G₃) (hh : h.comp f = g) :
h = (f.lift_of_right_inverse f_inv hf ⟨g, hg⟩) :=
begin
simp_rw ←hh,
exact ((f.lift_of_right_inverse f_inv hf).apply_symm_apply _).symm,
end
end monoid_hom
variables {N : Type*} [group N]
-- Here `H.normal` is an explicit argument so we can use dot notation with `comap`.
@[to_additive]
lemma subgroup.normal.comap {H : subgroup N} (hH : H.normal) (f : G →* N) :
(H.comap f).normal :=
⟨λ _, by simp [subgroup.mem_comap, hH.conj_mem] {contextual := tt}⟩
@[priority 100, to_additive]
instance subgroup.normal_comap {H : subgroup N}
[nH : H.normal] (f : G →* N) : (H.comap f).normal := nH.comap _
@[priority 100, to_additive]
instance monoid_hom.normal_ker (f : G →* N) : f.ker.normal :=
by { rw [←f.comap_bot], apply_instance }
@[priority 100, to_additive]
instance subgroup.normal_inf (H N : subgroup G) [hN : N.normal] :
((H ⊓ N).comap H.subtype).normal :=
⟨λ x hx g, begin
simp only [subgroup.mem_inf, coe_subtype, subgroup.mem_comap] at hx,
simp only [subgroup.coe_mul, subgroup.mem_inf, coe_subtype, subgroup.coe_inv, subgroup.mem_comap],
exact ⟨H.mul_mem (H.mul_mem g.2 hx.1) (H.inv_mem g.2), hN.1 x hx.2 g⟩,
end⟩
namespace subgroup
/-- The subgroup generated by an element. -/
def zpowers (g : G) : subgroup G :=
subgroup.copy (zpowers_hom G g).range (set.range ((^) g : ℤ → G)) rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_zpowers (g : G) : g ∈ zpowers g := ⟨1, zpow_one _⟩
lemma zpowers_eq_closure (g : G) : zpowers g = closure {g} :=
by { ext, exact mem_closure_singleton.symm }
@[simp] lemma range_zpowers_hom (g : G) : (zpowers_hom G g).range = zpowers g := rfl
lemma zpowers_subset {a : G} {K : subgroup G} (h : a ∈ K) : zpowers a ≤ K :=
λ x hx, match x, hx with _, ⟨i, rfl⟩ := K.zpow_mem h i end
lemma mem_zpowers_iff {g h : G} :
h ∈ zpowers g ↔ ∃ (k : ℤ), g ^ k = h :=
iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma forall_zpowers {x : G} {p : zpowers x → Prop} :
(∀ g, p g) ↔ ∀ m : ℤ, p ⟨x ^ m, m, rfl⟩ :=
set.forall_subtype_range_iff
@[simp] lemma exists_zpowers {x : G} {p : zpowers x → Prop} :
(∃ g, p g) ↔ ∃ m : ℤ, p ⟨x ^ m, m, rfl⟩ :=
set.exists_subtype_range_iff
lemma forall_mem_zpowers {x : G} {p : G → Prop} :
(∀ g ∈ zpowers x, p g) ↔ ∀ m : ℤ, p (x ^ m) :=
set.forall_range_iff
lemma exists_mem_zpowers {x : G} {p : G → Prop} :
(∃ g ∈ zpowers x, p g) ↔ ∃ m : ℤ, p (x ^ m) :=
set.exists_range_iff
end subgroup
namespace add_subgroup
/-- The subgroup generated by an element. -/
def zmultiples (a : A) : add_subgroup A :=
add_subgroup.copy (zmultiples_hom A a).range (set.range ((• a) : ℤ → A)) rfl
@[simp] lemma range_zmultiples_hom (a : A) : (zmultiples_hom A a).range = zmultiples a := rfl
attribute [to_additive add_subgroup.zmultiples] subgroup.zpowers
attribute [to_additive add_subgroup.mem_zmultiples] subgroup.mem_zpowers
attribute [to_additive add_subgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure] subgroup.zpowers_eq_closure
attribute [to_additive add_subgroup.range_zmultiples_hom] subgroup.range_zpowers_hom
attribute [to_additive add_subgroup.zmultiples_subset] subgroup.zpowers_subset
attribute [to_additive add_subgroup.mem_zmultiples_iff] subgroup.mem_zpowers_iff
attribute [to_additive add_subgroup.forall_zmultiples] subgroup.forall_zpowers
attribute [to_additive add_subgroup.forall_mem_zmultiples] subgroup.forall_mem_zpowers
attribute [to_additive add_subgroup.exists_zmultiples] subgroup.exists_zpowers
attribute [to_additive add_subgroup.exists_mem_zmultiples] subgroup.exists_mem_zpowers
end add_subgroup
lemma int.mem_zmultiples_iff {a b : ℤ} :
b ∈ add_subgroup.zmultiples a ↔ a ∣ b :=
exists_congr (λ k, by rw [mul_comm, eq_comm, ← smul_eq_mul])
lemma of_mul_image_zpowers_eq_zmultiples_of_mul { x : G } :
additive.of_mul '' ((subgroup.zpowers x) : set G) = add_subgroup.zmultiples (additive.of_mul x) :=
begin
ext y,
split,
{ rintro ⟨z, ⟨m, hm⟩, hz2⟩,
use m,
simp only,
rwa [← of_mul_zpow, hm] },
{ rintros ⟨n, hn⟩,
refine ⟨x ^ n, ⟨n, rfl⟩, _⟩,
rwa of_mul_zpow }
end
lemma of_add_image_zmultiples_eq_zpowers_of_add {x : A} :
multiplicative.of_add '' ((add_subgroup.zmultiples x) : set A) =
subgroup.zpowers (multiplicative.of_add x) :=
begin
symmetry,
rw equiv.eq_image_iff_symm_image_eq,
exact of_mul_image_zpowers_eq_zmultiples_of_mul,
end
namespace mul_equiv
variables {H K : subgroup G}
/-- Makes the identity isomorphism from a proof two subgroups of a multiplicative
group are equal. -/
@[to_additive "Makes the identity additive isomorphism from a proof
two subgroups of an additive group are equal."]
def subgroup_congr (h : H = K) : H ≃* K :=
{ map_mul' := λ _ _, rfl, ..equiv.set_congr $ congr_arg _ h }
/-- A `mul_equiv` `φ` between two groups `G` and `G'` induces a `mul_equiv` between
a subgroup `H ≤ G` and the subgroup `φ(H) ≤ G'`. -/
@[to_additive "An `add_equiv` `φ` between two additive groups `G` and `G'` induces an `add_equiv`
between a subgroup `H ≤ G` and the subgroup `φ(H) ≤ G'`. "]
def subgroup_equiv_map {G'} [group G'] (e : G ≃* G') (H : subgroup G) :
H ≃* H.map e.to_monoid_hom :=
e.submonoid_equiv_map H.to_submonoid
end mul_equiv
-- TODO : ↥(⊤ : subgroup H) ≃* H ?
namespace subgroup
variables {C : Type*} [comm_group C] {s t : subgroup C} {x : C}
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_sup : x ∈ s ⊔ t ↔ ∃ (y ∈ s) (z ∈ t), y * z = x :=
⟨λ h, begin
rw [← closure_eq s, ← closure_eq t, ← closure_union] at h,
apply closure_induction h,
{ rintro y (h | h),
{ exact ⟨y, h, 1, t.one_mem, by simp⟩ },
{ exact ⟨1, s.one_mem, y, h, by simp⟩ } },
{ exact ⟨1, s.one_mem, 1, ⟨t.one_mem, mul_one 1⟩⟩ },
{ rintro _ _ ⟨y₁, hy₁, z₁, hz₁, rfl⟩ ⟨y₂, hy₂, z₂, hz₂, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨_, mul_mem _ hy₁ hy₂, _, mul_mem _ hz₁ hz₂, by simp [mul_assoc]; cc⟩ },
{ rintro _ ⟨y, hy, z, hz, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨_, inv_mem _ hy, _, inv_mem _ hz, mul_comm z y ▸ (mul_inv_rev z y).symm⟩ }
end, by rintro ⟨y, hy, z, hz, rfl⟩; exact mul_mem_sup hy hz⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_sup' : x ∈ s ⊔ t ↔ ∃ (y : s) (z : t), (y:C) * z = x :=
mem_sup.trans $ by simp only [set_like.exists, coe_mk]
@[to_additive]
instance : is_modular_lattice (subgroup C) :=
⟨λ x y z xz a ha, begin
rw [mem_inf, mem_sup] at ha,
rcases ha with ⟨⟨b, hb, c, hc, rfl⟩, haz⟩,
rw mem_sup,
refine ⟨b, hb, c, mem_inf.2 ⟨hc, _⟩, rfl⟩,
rw ← inv_mul_cancel_left b c,
apply z.mul_mem (z.inv_mem (xz hb)) haz,
end⟩
end subgroup
section
variables (G) (A)
/-- A `group` is simple when it has exactly two normal `subgroup`s. -/
class is_simple_group extends nontrivial G : Prop :=
(eq_bot_or_eq_top_of_normal : ∀ H : subgroup G, H.normal → H = ⊥ ∨ H = ⊤)
/-- An `add_group` is simple when it has exactly two normal `add_subgroup`s. -/
class is_simple_add_group extends nontrivial A : Prop :=
(eq_bot_or_eq_top_of_normal : ∀ H : add_subgroup A, H.normal → H = ⊥ ∨ H = ⊤)
attribute [to_additive] is_simple_group
variables {G} {A}
@[to_additive]
lemma subgroup.normal.eq_bot_or_eq_top [is_simple_group G] {H : subgroup G} (Hn : H.normal) :
H = ⊥ ∨ H = ⊤ :=
is_simple_group.eq_bot_or_eq_top_of_normal H Hn
namespace is_simple_group
@[to_additive]
instance {C : Type*} [comm_group C] [is_simple_group C] :
is_simple_lattice (subgroup C) :=
⟨λ H, H.normal_of_comm.eq_bot_or_eq_top⟩
open _root_.subgroup
@[to_additive]
lemma is_simple_group_of_surjective {H : Type*} [group H] [is_simple_group G]
[nontrivial H] (f : G →* H) (hf : function.surjective f) :
is_simple_group H :=
⟨nontrivial.exists_pair_ne, λ H iH, begin
refine ((iH.comap f).eq_bot_or_eq_top).imp (λ h, _) (λ h, _),
{ rw [←map_bot f, ←h, map_comap_eq_self_of_surjective hf] },
{ rw [←comap_top f] at h, exact comap_injective hf h }
end⟩
end is_simple_group
end
namespace subgroup
section pointwise
@[to_additive]
lemma closure_mul_le (S T : set G) : closure (S * T) ≤ closure S ⊔ closure T :=
Inf_le $ λ x ⟨s, t, hs, ht, hx⟩, hx ▸ (closure S ⊔ closure T).mul_mem
(set_like.le_def.mp le_sup_left $ subset_closure hs)
(set_like.le_def.mp le_sup_right $ subset_closure ht)
@[to_additive]
lemma sup_eq_closure (H K : subgroup G) : H ⊔ K = closure (H * K) :=
le_antisymm
(sup_le
(λ h hh, subset_closure ⟨h, 1, hh, K.one_mem, mul_one h⟩)
(λ k hk, subset_closure ⟨1, k, H.one_mem, hk, one_mul k⟩))
(by conv_rhs { rw [← closure_eq H, ← closure_eq K] }; apply closure_mul_le)
@[to_additive]
private def mul_normal_aux (H N : subgroup G) [hN : N.normal] : subgroup G :=
{ carrier := (H : set G) * N,
one_mem' := ⟨1, 1, H.one_mem, N.one_mem, by rw mul_one⟩,
mul_mem' := λ a b ⟨h, n, hh, hn, ha⟩ ⟨h', n', hh', hn', hb⟩,
⟨h * h', h'⁻¹ * n * h' * n',
H.mul_mem hh hh', N.mul_mem (by simpa using hN.conj_mem _ hn h'⁻¹) hn',
by simp [← ha, ← hb, mul_assoc]⟩,
inv_mem' := λ x ⟨h, n, hh, hn, hx⟩,
⟨h⁻¹, h * n⁻¹ * h⁻¹, H.inv_mem hh, hN.conj_mem _ (N.inv_mem hn) h,
by rw [mul_assoc h, inv_mul_cancel_left, ← hx, mul_inv_rev]⟩ }
/-- The carrier of `H ⊔ N` is just `↑H * ↑N` (pointwise set product) when `N` is normal. -/
@[to_additive "The carrier of `H ⊔ N` is just `↑H + ↑N` (pointwise set addition)
when `N` is normal."]
lemma mul_normal (H N : subgroup G) [N.normal] : (↑(H ⊔ N) : set G) = H * N :=
set.subset.antisymm
(show H ⊔ N ≤ mul_normal_aux H N,
by { rw sup_eq_closure, apply Inf_le _, dsimp, refl })
((sup_eq_closure H N).symm ▸ subset_closure)
@[to_additive]
private def normal_mul_aux (N H : subgroup G) [hN : N.normal] : subgroup G :=
{ carrier := (N : set G) * H,
one_mem' := ⟨1, 1, N.one_mem, H.one_mem, by rw mul_one⟩,
mul_mem' := λ a b ⟨n, h, hn, hh, ha⟩ ⟨n', h', hn', hh', hb⟩,
⟨n * (h * n' * h⁻¹), h * h',
N.mul_mem hn (hN.conj_mem _ hn' _), H.mul_mem hh hh',
by simp [← ha, ← hb, mul_assoc]⟩,
inv_mem' := λ x ⟨n, h, hn, hh, hx⟩,
⟨h⁻¹ * n⁻¹ * h, h⁻¹,
by simpa using hN.conj_mem _ (N.inv_mem hn) h⁻¹, H.inv_mem hh,
by rw [mul_inv_cancel_right, ← mul_inv_rev, hx]⟩ }
/-- The carrier of `N ⊔ H` is just `↑N * ↑H` (pointwise set product) when `N` is normal. -/
@[to_additive "The carrier of `N ⊔ H` is just `↑N + ↑H` (pointwise set addition)
when `N` is normal."]
lemma normal_mul (N H : subgroup G) [N.normal] : (↑(N ⊔ H) : set G) = N * H :=
set.subset.antisymm
(show N ⊔ H ≤ normal_mul_aux N H,
by { rw sup_eq_closure, apply Inf_le _, dsimp, refl })
((sup_eq_closure N H).symm ▸ subset_closure)
@[to_additive] lemma mul_inf_assoc (A B C : subgroup G) (h : A ≤ C) :
(A : set G) * ↑(B ⊓ C) = (A * B) ⊓ C :=
begin
ext,
simp only [coe_inf, set.inf_eq_inter, set.mem_mul, set.mem_inter_iff],
split,
{ rintros ⟨y, z, hy, ⟨hzB, hzC⟩, rfl⟩,
refine ⟨_, mul_mem C (h hy) hzC⟩,
exact ⟨y, z, hy, hzB, rfl⟩ },
rintros ⟨⟨y, z, hy, hz, rfl⟩, hyz⟩,
refine ⟨y, z, hy, ⟨hz, _⟩, rfl⟩,
suffices : y⁻¹ * (y * z) ∈ C, { simpa },
exact mul_mem C (inv_mem C (h hy)) hyz
end
@[to_additive] lemma inf_mul_assoc (A B C : subgroup G) (h : C ≤ A) :
((A ⊓ B : subgroup G) : set G) * C = A ⊓ (B * C) :=
begin
ext,
simp only [coe_inf, set.inf_eq_inter, set.mem_mul, set.mem_inter_iff],
split,
{ rintros ⟨y, z, ⟨hyA, hyB⟩, hz, rfl⟩,
refine ⟨mul_mem A hyA (h hz), _⟩,
exact ⟨y, z, hyB, hz, rfl⟩ },
rintros ⟨hyz, y, z, hy, hz, rfl⟩,
refine ⟨y, z, ⟨_, hy⟩, hz, rfl⟩,
suffices : (y * z) * z⁻¹ ∈ A, { simpa },
exact mul_mem A hyz (inv_mem A (h hz))
end
end pointwise
section subgroup_normal
@[to_additive] lemma normal_subgroup_of_iff {H K : subgroup G} (hHK : H ≤ K) :
(H.subgroup_of K).normal ↔ ∀ h k, h ∈ H → k ∈ K → k * h * k⁻¹ ∈ H :=
⟨λ hN h k hH hK, hN.conj_mem ⟨h, hHK hH⟩ hH ⟨k, hK⟩,
λ hN, { conj_mem := λ h hm k, (hN h.1 k.1 hm k.2) }⟩
@[to_additive] instance prod_subgroup_of_prod_normal
{H₁ K₁ : subgroup G} {H₂ K₂ : subgroup N}
[h₁ : (H₁.subgroup_of K₁).normal] [h₂ : (H₂.subgroup_of K₂).normal] :
((H₁.prod H₂).subgroup_of (K₁.prod K₂)).normal :=
{ conj_mem := λ n hgHK g,
⟨h₁.conj_mem ⟨(n : G × N).fst, (mem_prod.mp n.2).1⟩
hgHK.1 ⟨(g : G × N).fst, (mem_prod.mp g.2).1⟩,
h₂.conj_mem ⟨(n : G × N).snd, (mem_prod.mp n.2).2⟩
hgHK.2 ⟨(g : G × N).snd, (mem_prod.mp g.2).2⟩⟩ }
@[to_additive] instance prod_normal
(H : subgroup G) (K : subgroup N) [hH : H.normal] [hK : K.normal] :
(H.prod K).normal :=
{ conj_mem := λ n hg g,
⟨hH.conj_mem n.fst (subgroup.mem_prod.mp hg).1 g.fst,
hK.conj_mem n.snd (subgroup.mem_prod.mp hg).2 g.snd⟩ }
@[to_additive] lemma inf_subgroup_of_inf_normal_of_right
(A B' B : subgroup G) (hB : B' ≤ B) [hN : (B'.subgroup_of B).normal] :
((A ⊓ B').subgroup_of (A ⊓ B)).normal :=
{ conj_mem := λ n hn g,
⟨mul_mem A (mul_mem A (mem_inf.1 g.2).1 (mem_inf.1 n.2).1) (inv_mem A (mem_inf.1 g.2).1),
(normal_subgroup_of_iff hB).mp hN n g hn.2 (mem_inf.mp g.2).2⟩ }
@[to_additive] lemma inf_subgroup_of_inf_normal_of_left
{A' A : subgroup G} (B : subgroup G) (hA : A' ≤ A) [hN : (A'.subgroup_of A).normal] :
((A' ⊓ B).subgroup_of (A ⊓ B)).normal :=
{ conj_mem := λ n hn g,
⟨(normal_subgroup_of_iff hA).mp hN n g hn.1 (mem_inf.mp g.2).1,
mul_mem B (mul_mem B (mem_inf.1 g.2).2 (mem_inf.1 n.2).2) (inv_mem B (mem_inf.1 g.2).2)⟩ }
instance sup_normal (H K : subgroup G) [hH : H.normal] [hK : K.normal] : (H ⊔ K).normal :=
{ conj_mem := λ n hmem g,
begin
change n ∈ ↑(H ⊔ K) at hmem,
change g * n * g⁻¹ ∈ ↑(H ⊔ K),
rw [normal_mul, set.mem_mul] at *,
rcases hmem with ⟨h, k, hh, hk, rfl⟩,
refine ⟨g * h * g⁻¹, g * k * g⁻¹, hH.conj_mem h hh g, hK.conj_mem k hk g, _⟩,
simp
end }
@[to_additive] instance normal_inf_normal (H K : subgroup G) [hH : H.normal] [hK : K.normal] :
(H ⊓ K).normal :=
{ conj_mem := λ n hmem g,
by { rw mem_inf at *, exact ⟨hH.conj_mem n hmem.1 g, hK.conj_mem n hmem.2 g⟩ } }
@[to_additive] lemma subgroup_of_sup (A A' B : subgroup G) (hA : A ≤ B) (hA' : A' ≤ B) :
(A ⊔ A').subgroup_of B = A.subgroup_of B ⊔ A'.subgroup_of B :=
begin
refine map_injective_of_ker_le B.subtype
(ker_le_comap _ _) (le_trans (ker_le_comap B.subtype _) le_sup_left) _,
{ simp only [subgroup_of, map_comap_eq, map_sup, subtype_range],
rw [inf_of_le_right (sup_le hA hA'), inf_of_le_right hA', inf_of_le_right hA] },
end
@[to_additive] lemma subgroup_normal.mem_comm {H K : subgroup G}
(hK : H ≤ K) [hN : (H.subgroup_of K).normal] {a b : G} (hb : b ∈ K) (h : a * b ∈ H) :
b * a ∈ H :=
begin
have := (normal_subgroup_of_iff hK).mp hN (a * b) b h hb,
rwa [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_right_inv, mul_one] at this,
end
end subgroup_normal
end subgroup
namespace is_conj
open subgroup
lemma normal_closure_eq_top_of {N : subgroup G} [hn : N.normal]
{g g' : G} {hg : g ∈ N} {hg' : g' ∈ N} (hc : is_conj g g')
(ht : normal_closure ({⟨g, hg⟩} : set N) = ⊤) :
normal_closure ({⟨g', hg'⟩} : set N) = ⊤ :=
begin
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := is_conj_iff.1 hc,
have h : ∀ x : N, (mul_aut.conj c) x ∈ N,
{ rintro ⟨x, hx⟩,
exact hn.conj_mem _ hx c },
have hs : function.surjective (((mul_aut.conj c).to_monoid_hom.restrict N).cod_restrict _ h),
{ rintro ⟨x, hx⟩,
refine ⟨⟨c⁻¹ * x * c, _⟩, _⟩,
{ have h := hn.conj_mem _ hx c⁻¹,
rwa [inv_inv] at h },
simp only [monoid_hom.cod_restrict_apply, mul_equiv.coe_to_monoid_hom, mul_aut.conj_apply,
coe_mk, monoid_hom.restrict_apply, subtype.mk_eq_mk, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_self, one_mul],
rw [mul_assoc, mul_inv_self, mul_one] },
have ht' := map_mono (eq_top_iff.1 ht),
rw [← monoid_hom.range_eq_map, monoid_hom.range_top_of_surjective _ hs] at ht',
refine eq_top_iff.2 (le_trans ht' (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 (normal_closure_le_normal _))),
rw [set.singleton_subset_iff, set_like.mem_coe],
simp only [monoid_hom.cod_restrict_apply, mul_equiv.coe_to_monoid_hom, mul_aut.conj_apply, coe_mk,
monoid_hom.restrict_apply, mem_comap],
exact subset_normal_closure (set.mem_singleton _),
end
end is_conj
/-! ### Actions by `subgroup`s
These are just copies of the definitions about `submonoid` starting from `submonoid.mul_action`.
-/
section actions
namespace subgroup
variables {α β : Type*}
/-- The action by a subgroup is the action by the underlying group. -/
@[to_additive /-"The additive action by an add_subgroup is the action by the underlying
add_group. "-/]
instance [mul_action G α] (S : subgroup G) : mul_action S α :=
S.to_submonoid.mul_action
@[to_additive]
lemma smul_def [mul_action G α] {S : subgroup G} (g : S) (m : α) : g • m = (g : G) • m := rfl
@[to_additive]
instance smul_comm_class_left
[mul_action G β] [has_scalar α β] [smul_comm_class G α β] (S : subgroup G) :
smul_comm_class S α β :=
S.to_submonoid.smul_comm_class_left
@[to_additive]
instance smul_comm_class_right
[has_scalar α β] [mul_action G β] [smul_comm_class α G β] (S : subgroup G) :
smul_comm_class α S β :=
S.to_submonoid.smul_comm_class_right
/-- Note that this provides `is_scalar_tower S G G` which is needed by `smul_mul_assoc`. -/
instance
[has_scalar α β] [mul_action G α] [mul_action G β] [is_scalar_tower G α β] (S : subgroup G) :
is_scalar_tower S α β :=
S.to_submonoid.is_scalar_tower
instance [mul_action G α] [has_faithful_scalar G α] (S : subgroup G) :
has_faithful_scalar S α :=
S.to_submonoid.has_faithful_scalar
/-- The action by a subgroup is the action by the underlying group. -/
instance [add_monoid α] [distrib_mul_action G α] (S : subgroup G) : distrib_mul_action S α :=
S.to_submonoid.distrib_mul_action
/-- The action by a subgroup is the action by the underlying group. -/
instance [monoid α] [mul_distrib_mul_action G α] (S : subgroup G) : mul_distrib_mul_action S α :=
S.to_submonoid.mul_distrib_mul_action
end subgroup
end actions
/-! ### Saturated subgroups -/
section saturated
namespace subgroup
/-- A subgroup `H` of `G` is *saturated* if for all `n : ℕ` and `g : G` with `g^n ∈ H`
we have `n = 0` or `g ∈ H`. -/
@[to_additive "An additive subgroup `H` of `G` is *saturated* if
for all `n : ℕ` and `g : G` with `n•g ∈ H` we have `n = 0` or `g ∈ H`."]
def saturated (H : subgroup G) : Prop := ∀ ⦃n g⦄, g ^ n ∈ H → n = 0 ∨ g ∈ H
@[to_additive] lemma saturated_iff_npow {H : subgroup G} :
saturated H ↔ (∀ (n : ℕ) (g : G), g ^ n ∈ H → n = 0 ∨ g ∈ H) := iff.rfl
@[to_additive] lemma saturated_iff_zpow {H : subgroup G} :
saturated H ↔ (∀ (n : ℤ) (g : G), g ^ n ∈ H → n = 0 ∨ g ∈ H) :=
begin
split,
{ rintros hH ⟨n⟩ g hgn,
{ simp only [int.coe_nat_eq_zero, int.of_nat_eq_coe, zpow_coe_nat] at hgn ⊢,
exact hH hgn },
{ suffices : g ^ (n+1) ∈ H,
{ refine (hH this).imp _ id, simp only [forall_false_left, nat.succ_ne_zero], },
simpa only [inv_mem_iff, zpow_neg_succ_of_nat] using hgn, } },
{ intros h n g hgn,
specialize h n g,
simp only [int.coe_nat_eq_zero, zpow_coe_nat] at h,
apply h hgn }
end
end subgroup
namespace add_subgroup
lemma ker_saturated {A₁ A₂ : Type*} [add_comm_group A₁] [add_comm_group A₂]
[no_zero_smul_divisors ℕ A₂] (f : A₁ →+ A₂) :
(f.ker).saturated :=
begin
intros n g hg,
simpa only [f.mem_ker, nsmul_eq_smul, f.map_nsmul, smul_eq_zero] using hg
end
end add_subgroup
end saturated
|
b89954ff2889eeaf35c25acbc9c5fb4d0e1f7df1 | 217bb195841a8be2d1b4edd2084d6b69ccd62f50 | /library/init/data/rbmap/basic.lean | cf0258d066c49ef3f26e9487be852ee0b4f166a2 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | frank-lesser/lean4 | 717f56c9bacd5bf3a67542d2f5cea721d4743a30 | 79e2abe33f73162f773ea731265e456dbfe822f9 | refs/heads/master | 1,589,741,267,933 | 1,556,424,200,000 | 1,556,424,281,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,306 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import init.data.repr init.data.option.basic
universes u v w w'
inductive Rbcolor
| red | black
inductive RBNode (α : Type u) (β : α → Type v)
| leaf {} : RBNode
| node (color : Rbcolor) (lchild : RBNode) (key : α) (val : β key) (rchild : RBNode) : RBNode
namespace RBNode
variables {α : Type u} {β : α → Type v} {σ : Type w}
open Rbcolor Nat
def depth (f : Nat → Nat → Nat) : RBNode α β → Nat
| leaf := 0
| (node _ l _ _ r) := succ (f (depth l) (depth r))
protected def min : RBNode α β → Option (Σ k : α, β k)
| leaf := none
| (node _ leaf k v _) := some ⟨k, v⟩
| (node _ l k v _) := min l
protected def max : RBNode α β → Option (Σ k : α, β k)
| leaf := none
| (node _ _ k v leaf) := some ⟨k, v⟩
| (node _ _ k v r) := max r
@[specialize] def fold (f : σ → Π (k : α), β k → σ) : σ → RBNode α β → σ
| b leaf := b
| b (node _ l k v r) := fold (f (fold b l) k v) r
@[specialize] def mfold {m : Type w → Type w'} [Monad m] (f : σ → Π (k : α), β k → m σ) : σ → RBNode α β → m σ
| b leaf := pure b
| b (node _ l k v r) := do
b ← mfold b l,
b ← f b k v,
mfold b r
@[specialize] def revFold (f : σ → Π (k : α), β k → σ) : σ → RBNode α β → σ
| b leaf := b
| b (node _ l k v r) := revFold (f (revFold b r) k v) l
@[specialize] def all (p : Π k : α, β k → Bool) : RBNode α β → Bool
| leaf := true
| (node _ l k v r) := p k v && all l && all r
@[specialize] def any (p : Π k : α, β k → Bool) : RBNode α β → Bool
| leaf := false
| (node _ l k v r) := p k v || any l || any r
def singleton (k : α) (v : β k) : RBNode α β :=
node red leaf k v leaf
@[inline] def balance1 : Π a, β a → RBNode α β → RBNode α β → RBNode α β
| kv vv t (node _ (node red l kx vx r₁) ky vy r₂) := node red (node black l kx vx r₁) ky vy (node black r₂ kv vv t)
| kv vv t (node _ l₁ ky vy (node red l₂ kx vx r)) := node red (node black l₁ ky vy l₂) kx vx (node black r kv vv t)
| kv vv t (node _ l ky vy r) := node black (node red l ky vy r) kv vv t
| _ _ _ _ := leaf -- unreachable
@[inline] def balance2 : RBNode α β → Π a, β a → RBNode α β → RBNode α β
| t kv vv (node _ (node red l kx₁ vx₁ r₁) ky vy r₂) := node red (node black t kv vv l) kx₁ vx₁ (node black r₁ ky vy r₂)
| t kv vv (node _ l₁ ky vy (node red l₂ kx₂ vx₂ r₂)) := node red (node black t kv vv l₁) ky vy (node black l₂ kx₂ vx₂ r₂)
| t kv vv (node _ l ky vy r) := node black t kv vv (node red l ky vy r)
| _ _ _ _ := leaf -- unreachable
def isRed : RBNode α β → Bool
| (node red _ _ _ _) := true
| _ := false
section insert
variables (lt : α → α → Bool)
@[specialize] def ins : RBNode α β → Π k : α, β k → RBNode α β
| leaf kx vx := node red leaf kx vx leaf
| (node red a ky vy b) kx vx :=
if lt kx ky then node red (ins a kx vx) ky vy b
else if lt ky kx then node red a ky vy (ins b kx vx)
else node red a kx vx b
| (node black a ky vy b) kx vx :=
if lt kx ky then
if isRed a then balance1 ky vy b (ins a kx vx)
else node black (ins a kx vx) ky vy b
else if lt ky kx then
if isRed b then balance2 a ky vy (ins b kx vx)
else node black a ky vy (ins b kx vx)
else
node black a kx vx b
def setBlack : RBNode α β → RBNode α β
| (node _ l k v r) := node black l k v r
| e := e
@[inline] def insert (t : RBNode α β) (k : α) (v : β k) : RBNode α β :=
if isRed t then setBlack (ins lt t k v)
else ins lt t k v
end insert
section membership
variable (lt : α → α → Bool)
@[specialize] def findCore : RBNode α β → Π k : α, Option (Σ k : α, β k)
| leaf x := none
| (node _ a ky vy b) x :=
if lt x ky then findCore a x
else if lt ky x then findCore b x
else some ⟨ky, vy⟩
@[specialize] def find {β : Type v} : RBNode α (λ _, β) → α → Option β
| leaf x := none
| (node _ a ky vy b) x :=
if lt x ky then find a x
else if lt ky x then find b x
else some vy
@[specialize] def lowerBound : RBNode α β → α → Option (Sigma β) → Option (Sigma β)
| leaf x lb := lb
| (node _ a ky vy b) x lb :=
if lt x ky then lowerBound a x lb
else if lt ky x then lowerBound b x (some ⟨ky, vy⟩)
else some ⟨ky, vy⟩
end membership
inductive WellFormed (lt : α → α → Bool) : RBNode α β → Prop
| leafWff : WellFormed leaf
| insertWff {n n' : RBNode α β} {k : α} {v : β k} : WellFormed n → n' = insert lt n k v → WellFormed n'
end RBNode
open RBNode
/- TODO(Leo): define dRBMap -/
def RBMap (α : Type u) (β : Type v) (lt : α → α → Bool) : Type (max u v) :=
{t : RBNode α (λ _, β) // t.WellFormed lt }
@[inline] def mkRBMap (α : Type u) (β : Type v) (lt : α → α → Bool) : RBMap α β lt :=
⟨leaf, WellFormed.leafWff lt⟩
@[inline] def RBMap.empty {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Bool} : RBMap α β lt :=
mkRBMap _ _ _
instance (α : Type u) (β : Type v) (lt : α → α → Bool) : HasEmptyc (RBMap α β lt) :=
⟨RBMap.empty⟩
namespace RBMap
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {σ : Type w} {lt : α → α → Bool}
def depth (f : Nat → Nat → Nat) (t : RBMap α β lt) : Nat :=
t.val.depth f
@[inline] def fold (f : σ → α → β → σ) : σ → RBMap α β lt → σ
| b ⟨t, _⟩ := t.fold f b
@[inline] def revFold (f : σ → α → β → σ) : σ → RBMap α β lt → σ
| b ⟨t, _⟩ := t.revFold f b
@[inline] def mfold {m : Type w → Type w'} [Monad m] (f : σ → α → β → m σ) : σ → RBMap α β lt → m σ
| b ⟨t, _⟩ := t.mfold f b
@[inline] def mfor {m : Type w → Type w'} [Monad m] (f : α → β → m σ) (t : RBMap α β lt) : m PUnit :=
t.mfold (λ _ k v, f k v *> pure ⟨⟩) ⟨⟩
@[inline] def isEmpty : RBMap α β lt → Bool
| ⟨leaf, _⟩ := true
| _ := false
@[specialize] def toList : RBMap α β lt → List (α × β)
| ⟨t, _⟩ := t.revFold (λ ps k v, (k, v)::ps) []
@[inline] protected def min : RBMap α β lt → Option (α × β)
| ⟨t, _⟩ :=
match t.min with
| some ⟨k, v⟩ := some (k, v)
| none := none
@[inline] protected def max : RBMap α β lt → Option (α × β)
| ⟨t, _⟩ :=
match t.max with
| some ⟨k, v⟩ := some (k, v)
| none := none
instance [HasRepr α] [HasRepr β] : HasRepr (RBMap α β lt) :=
⟨λ t, "rbmapOf " ++ repr t.toList⟩
@[inline] def insert : RBMap α β lt → α → β → RBMap α β lt
| ⟨t, w⟩ k v := ⟨t.insert lt k v, WellFormed.insertWff w rfl⟩
@[specialize] def ofList : List (α × β) → RBMap α β lt
| [] := mkRBMap _ _ _
| (⟨k,v⟩::xs) := (ofList xs).insert k v
@[inline] def findCore : RBMap α β lt → α → Option (Σ k : α, β)
| ⟨t, _⟩ x := t.findCore lt x
@[inline] def find : RBMap α β lt → α → Option β
| ⟨t, _⟩ x := t.find lt x
/-- (lowerBound k) retrieves the kv pair of the largest key smaller than or equal to `k`,
if it exists. -/
@[inline] def lowerBound : RBMap α β lt → α → Option (Σ k : α, β)
| ⟨t, _⟩ x := t.lowerBound lt x none
@[inline] def contains (t : RBMap α β lt) (a : α) : Bool :=
(t.find a).isSome
@[inline] def fromList (l : List (α × β)) (lt : α → α → Bool) : RBMap α β lt :=
l.foldl (λ r p, r.insert p.1 p.2) (mkRBMap α β lt)
@[inline] def all : RBMap α β lt → (α → β → Bool) → Bool
| ⟨t, _⟩ p := t.all p
@[inline] def any : RBMap α β lt → (α → β → Bool) → Bool
| ⟨t, _⟩ p := t.any p
end RBMap
def rbmapOf {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (l : List (α × β)) (lt : α → α → Bool) : RBMap α β lt :=
RBMap.fromList l lt
|
9df76360c0c8347a01b55e0b9613db2d5fac0c20 | 9b9a16fa2cb737daee6b2785474678b6fa91d6d4 | /src/category_theory/instances/monoids.lean | 4158f7fe1da02e25dedef50129a074c2c96579af | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | johoelzl/mathlib | 253f46daa30b644d011e8e119025b01ad69735c4 | 592e3c7a2dfbd5826919b4605559d35d4d75938f | refs/heads/master | 1,625,657,216,488 | 1,551,374,946,000 | 1,551,374,946,000 | 98,915,829 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,522,917,267,000 | 1,501,524,499,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,741 | lean | /- Copyright (c) 2018 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
Introduce Mon -- the category of monoids.
Currently only the basic setup.
-/
import category_theory.concrete_category
import category_theory.fully_faithful
import category_theory.adjunction
import data.finsupp
universes u v
open category_theory
namespace category_theory.instances
/-- The category of monoids and monoid morphisms. -/
@[reducible] def Mon : Type (u+1) := bundled monoid
instance (x : Mon) : monoid x := x.str
instance concrete_is_monoid_hom : concrete_category @is_monoid_hom :=
⟨by introsI α ia; apply_instance,
by introsI α β γ ia ib ic f g hf hg; apply_instance⟩
instance Mon_hom_is_monoid_hom {R S : Mon} (f : R ⟶ S) : is_monoid_hom (f : R → S) := f.2
/-- The category of commutative monoids and monoid morphisms. -/
@[reducible] def CommMon : Type (u+1) := bundled comm_monoid
instance (x : CommMon) : comm_monoid x := x.str
@[reducible] def is_comm_monoid_hom {α β} [comm_monoid α] [comm_monoid β] (f : α → β) : Prop :=
is_monoid_hom f
instance concrete_is_comm_monoid_hom : concrete_category @is_comm_monoid_hom :=
⟨by introsI α ia; apply_instance,
by introsI α β γ ia ib ic f g hf hg; apply_instance⟩
instance CommMon_hom_is_comm_monoid_hom {R S : CommMon} (f : R ⟶ S) :
is_comm_monoid_hom (f : R → S) := f.2
namespace CommMon
/-- The forgetful functor from commutative monoids to monoids. -/
def forget_to_Mon : CommMon ⥤ Mon :=
concrete_functor
(by intros _ c; exact { ..c })
(by introsI _ _ _ _ f i; exact { ..i })
instance : faithful (forget_to_Mon) := {}
end CommMon
end category_theory.instances
|
5a5bcefa56e5fdab6f23ecfe550a17fb01482421 | 037dba89703a79cd4a4aec5e959818147f97635d | /src/2020/relations/equiv_partition.lean | 20ecb746667e41dfe0207cb62aa37e533523b8d8 | [] | no_license | ImperialCollegeLondon/M40001_lean | 3a6a09298da395ab51bc220a535035d45bbe919b | 62a76fa92654c855af2b2fc2bef8e60acd16ccec | refs/heads/master | 1,666,750,403,259 | 1,665,771,117,000 | 1,665,771,117,000 | 209,141,835 | 115 | 12 | null | 1,640,270,596,000 | 1,568,749,174,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,894 | lean | import tactic
import data.setoid.partition
--#check setoid.partition.rel_iso
open setoid
variable (α : Type)
-- mathlib has this function already.
/-
def classes (r : setoid α) : set (set α) :=
{s | ∃ y, s = {x | r.rel x y}}
-/
-- set_option pp.notation false
example : {p : set (set α) // is_partition p} ≃
setoid α :=
{ to_fun := λ pa, { r := λ (a b : α), ∀ X ∈ pa.1, a ∈ X → b ∈ X,
iseqv :=
begin
cases pa with p hp,
dsimp only at *,
-- Need to check that the binary relation on α coming from
-- a partition p is reflexive, symmetric and transitive
-- note that p is just the set of sets; hp is the proof
-- that it's a partition.
split,
{ -- reflexive
unfold reflexive,
cc,
},
split,
{ -- symmetric
-- this needs thought
-- rintros a b hab X (hX : X ∈ p) hbX,
-- obtain ⟨Y, ⟨hYp, haY, -⟩, hY2⟩ := hp.2 a, simp at hY2,
-- have hY3 : ∀ (Z : set α), Z ∈ p → a ∈ Z → Z = Y,
rintros b c hbc X (hX : X ∈ p) hcX,
obtain ⟨Y, ⟨hYp, hcY, -⟩, hY2⟩ := hp.2 c, simp at hY2,
have hpcY : ∀ (Z : set α), Z ∈ p → c ∈ Z → Z = Y,
simpa using hY2, clear hY2,
--specialize hab {x | r.rel x y}
have hXY := hpcY X hX hcX,
obtain ⟨Z, ⟨hZp, hbZ, -⟩, hZ2⟩ := hp.2 b, simp at hZ2,
have hcZ := hbc Z hZp hbZ,
have hZY := hpcY Z hZp hcZ,
rw [hXY, ← hZY], exact hbZ },
{ -- transitive
intros b c d hbc hcd X hXp hbX,
apply hcd, exact hXp,
apply hbc;
assumption,
}
end },
inv_fun := λ r, ⟨classes r,
begin
haveI : has_equiv α := ⟨r.rel⟩,
split,
{ -- empty set isn't an equiv class
-- proof by contradiction
intro h,
cases h with a ha,
suffices : a ∈ (∅ : set α),
cases this,
rw ha,
simp only [set.mem_set_of_eq],
},
{ intro a,
use {x : α | r.rel x a},
dsimp only,
split,
{ suffices : {x : α | r.rel x a} ∈ r.classes ∧ r.rel a a,
simpa,
split,
use a,
refl },
{ intro X,
rintro ⟨⟨c, rfl⟩, haX, -⟩,
ext b,
resetI,
-- TODO must fix this notation
change setoid.r b c ↔ r.rel b a,
change r.rel a c at haX,
split,
intro hbc,
apply r.iseqv.2.2, -- these suck
exact hbc,
apply r.iseqv.2.1,
exact haX,
-- need a ~ b <-> b ~ a
intro hba,
apply r.iseqv.2.2,exact hba, exact haX,
}
}
end⟩,
left_inv := begin
rintro ⟨p, hp⟩,
simp only,
ext X,
split,
{ rintro ⟨b, rfl⟩,
obtain ⟨Y, ⟨hYp, hbY, -⟩, hY2⟩ := hp.2 b,
have hpb : ∀ (y : set α), y ∈ p → b ∈ y → y = Y,
simpa using hY2, clear hY2,
convert hYp,
ext c,
obtain ⟨Z, ⟨hZp, hcZ, -⟩, hY2⟩ := hp.2 c,
have hpc : ∀ (y : set α), y ∈ p → c ∈ y → y = Z,
simpa using hY2, clear hY2,
show (∀ X : set α, X ∈ p → c ∈ X → b ∈ X) ↔ _,
split,
{ intro hpcb,
specialize hpcb Z hZp hcZ,
specialize hpb Z hZp hpcb,
rw ← hpb,
exact hcZ,
},
{ intro hcY,
intros X hXp hcX,
have hXZ := hpc X hXp hcX,
have hYZ := hpc Y hYp hcY,
convert hbY,
cc } },
{ intro hXp,
have hX : X.nonempty,
have h := hp.1,
rw ← set.ne_empty_iff_nonempty,
rintro rfl, contradiction,
cases hX with b hbX,
use b,
ext c,
simp,
show c ∈ X ↔ (∀ X : set α, X ∈ p → c ∈ X → b ∈ X),
split,
{ intros hcX Y hYp hcY,
convert hbX,
obtain ⟨Z, ⟨hZp, hcZ, -⟩, hY2⟩ := hp.2 c,
have hpc : ∀ (y : set α), y ∈ p → c ∈ y → y = Z,
simpa using hY2, clear hY2,
have hYZ := hpc Y hYp hcY,
have hXZ := hpc X hXp hcX,
cc },
{ intros hcb,
obtain ⟨Z, ⟨hZp, hcZ, -⟩, hY2⟩ := hp.2 c,
have hpc : ∀ (y : set α), y ∈ p → c ∈ y → y = Z,
simpa using hY2, clear hY2,
obtain ⟨Y, ⟨hYp, hbY, -⟩, hY2⟩ := hp.2 b,
have hpb : ∀ (y : set α), y ∈ p → b ∈ y → y = Y,
simpa using hY2, clear hY2,
have hZY := hpb Z hZp (hcb Z hZp hcZ),
have hXY := hpb X hXp hbX,
cc } }
end,
right_inv := begin
rintro ⟨r, hrr, hrs, hrt⟩,
ext s,
simp only [setoid.rel],
split,
{ intro h,
specialize h {x : α | r x s} (by use s; refl) (by apply hrr),
apply hrs,
exact h },
{ intros hrsb X,
rintros ⟨c, rfl⟩ h,
simp [setoid.rel] at h ⊢,
apply hrt, apply hrs, exact hrsb,
exact h,
}
end }
|
7172f03dce98a9d457964ff2f841239cada1f878 | 6b45072eb2b3db3ecaace2a7a0241ce81f815787 | /algebra/lattice/complete_boolean_algebra.lean | 8de16a86a1434afef0458fde81cbab54f5cf0cf6 | [] | no_license | avigad/library_dev | 27b47257382667b5eb7e6476c4f5b0d685dd3ddc | 9d8ac7c7798ca550874e90fed585caad030bbfac | refs/heads/master | 1,610,452,468,791 | 1,500,712,839,000 | 1,500,713,478,000 | 69,311,142 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,474,942,903,000 | 1,474,942,902,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,132 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
Theory of complete Boolean algebras.
-/
import .complete_lattice .boolean_algebra data.set.basic
set_option old_structure_cmd true
universes u v w
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Sort w}
namespace lattice
class complete_distrib_lattice α extends complete_lattice α :=
(infi_sup_le_sup_Inf : ∀a s, (⨅ b ∈ s, a ⊔ b) ≤ a ⊔ Inf s)
(inf_Sup_le_supr_inf : ∀a s, a ⊓ Sup s ≤ (⨆ b ∈ s, a ⊓ b))
section complete_distrib_lattice
variables [complete_distrib_lattice α] {a : α} {s : set α}
lemma sup_Inf_eq : a ⊔ Inf s = (⨅ b ∈ s, a ⊔ b) :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume i, le_infi $ assume h, sup_le_sup (le_refl _) (Inf_le h))
(complete_distrib_lattice.infi_sup_le_sup_Inf _ _)
lemma inf_Sup_eq : a ⊓ Sup s = (⨆ b ∈ s, a ⊓ b) :=
le_antisymm
(complete_distrib_lattice.inf_Sup_le_supr_inf _ _)
(supr_le $ assume i, supr_le $ assume h, inf_le_inf (le_refl _) (le_Sup h))
end complete_distrib_lattice
instance [d : complete_distrib_lattice α] : bounded_distrib_lattice α :=
{ d with
le_sup_inf := assume x y z,
calc (x ⊔ y) ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ≤ (⨅ b ∈ ({z, y} : set α), x ⊔ b) : by rw insert_of_has_insert; simp
... = x ⊔ Inf {z, y} : sup_Inf_eq^.symm
... = x ⊔ y ⊓ z : by rw insert_of_has_insert; simp }
class complete_boolean_algebra α extends boolean_algebra α, complete_distrib_lattice α
section complete_boolean_algebra
variables [complete_boolean_algebra α] {a b : α} {s : set α} {f : ι → α}
lemma neg_infi : - infi f = (⨆i, - f i) :=
le_antisymm
(neg_le_of_neg_le $ le_infi $ assume i, neg_le_of_neg_le $ le_supr (λi, - f i) i)
(supr_le $ assume i, neg_le_neg $ infi_le _ _)
lemma neg_supr : - supr f = (⨅i, - f i) :=
neg_eq_neg_of_eq (by simp [neg_infi])
lemma neg_Inf : - Inf s = (⨆i∈s, - i) :=
by simp [Inf_eq_infi, neg_infi]
lemma neg_Sup : - Sup s = (⨅i∈s, - i) :=
by simp [Sup_eq_supr, neg_supr]
end complete_boolean_algebra
end lattice
|
7254e96b99721fbb57b1c4e9458019e8b53157ce | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /src/Lean/Elab/Tactic/Match.lean | a2eb3c86f71168939962a5f520091c7f91c86522 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,370 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Parser.Term
import Lean.Elab.Match
import Lean.Elab.Tactic.Basic
import Lean.Elab.Tactic.Induction
namespace Lean.Elab.Tactic
open Meta
open TSyntax.Compat in
open Parser.Tactic in
private def mkAuxiliaryMatchTerm (parentTag : Name) (matchTac : Syntax) : MacroM (Term × Array Syntax) := do
let matchAlts := matchTac[5]
let alts := matchAlts[0].getArgs
let mut newAlts := #[]
let mut nextIdx := 1
let mut newCases := #[]
for alt in alts do
let alt := alt.setKind ``Parser.Term.matchAlt
let holeOrTacticSeq := alt[3]
-- must generate a separate mvar for each `| $patGroup | ... => ...` as they can have different local contexts
for patGroup in alt[1].getSepArgs do
let mut alt := alt.setArg 1 (mkNullNode #[patGroup])
if holeOrTacticSeq.isOfKind ``Parser.Term.syntheticHole then
pure ()
else if holeOrTacticSeq.isOfKind ``Parser.Term.hole then
let tag := if alts.size > 1 then parentTag ++ (`match).appendIndexAfter nextIdx else parentTag
let holeName := mkIdentFrom holeOrTacticSeq tag
let newHole ← `(?$holeName:ident)
nextIdx := nextIdx + 1
alt := alt.setArg 3 newHole
else
let newHole ← withFreshMacroScope `(?rhs)
let newHoleId := newHole.raw[1]
let newCase ← `(tactic|
case $newHoleId:ident =>%$(alt[2])
-- annotate `| ... =>` with state after `case`
with_annotate_state $(mkNullNode #[alt[0], alt[2]]) skip
$holeOrTacticSeq)
newCases := newCases.push newCase
alt := alt.setArg 3 newHole
newAlts := newAlts.push alt
let result := matchTac.setKind ``Parser.Term.«match»
let result := result.setArg 5 (mkNode ``Parser.Term.matchAlts #[mkNullNode newAlts])
return (result, newCases)
@[builtin_tactic Lean.Parser.Tactic.match]
def evalMatch : Tactic := fun stx => do
let tag ← getMainTag
let (matchTerm, casesStx) ← liftMacroM <| mkAuxiliaryMatchTerm tag stx
let refineMatchTerm ← `(tactic| refine no_implicit_lambda% $matchTerm)
let stxNew := mkNullNode (#[refineMatchTerm] ++ casesStx)
withMacroExpansion stx stxNew <| evalTactic stxNew
end Lean.Elab.Tactic
|
fe2d717c113ee2d51588d570d783547d98ebcb5f | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/combinatorics/simple_graph/partition.lean | 840ae22c4ee4c64abb548a280b3a8f9630b4364a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,216 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Arthur Paulino. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Arthur Paulino, Kyle Miller
-/
import combinatorics.simple_graph.coloring
/-!
# Graph partitions
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
This module provides an interface for dealing with partitions on simple graphs. A partition of
a graph `G`, with vertices `V`, is a set `P` of disjoint nonempty subsets of `V` such that:
* The union of the subsets in `P` is `V`.
* Each element of `P` is an independent set. (Each subset contains no pair of adjacent vertices.)
Graph partitions are graph colorings that do not name their colors. They are adjoint in the
following sense. Given a graph coloring, there is an associated partition from the set of color
classes, and given a partition, there is an associated graph coloring from using the partition's
subsets as colors. Going from graph colorings to partitions and back makes a coloring "canonical":
all colors are given a canonical name and unused colors are removed. Going from partitions to
graph colorings and back is the identity.
## Main definitions
* `simple_graph.partition` is a structure to represent a partition of a simple graph
* `simple_graph.partition.parts_card_le` is whether a given partition is an `n`-partition.
(a partition with at most `n` parts).
* `simple_graph.partitionable n` is whether a given graph is `n`-partite
* `simple_graph.partition.to_coloring` creates colorings from partitions
* `simple_graph.coloring.to_partition` creates partitions from colorings
## Main statements
* `simple_graph.partitionable_iff_colorable` is that `n`-partitionability and
`n`-colorability are equivalent.
-/
universes u v
namespace simple_graph
variables {V : Type u} (G : simple_graph V)
/--
A `partition` of a simple graph `G` is a structure constituted by
* `parts`: a set of subsets of the vertices `V` of `G`
* `is_partition`: a proof that `parts` is a proper partition of `V`
* `independent`: a proof that each element of `parts` doesn't have a pair of adjacent vertices
-/
structure partition :=
(parts : set (set V))
(is_partition : setoid.is_partition parts)
(independent : ∀ (s ∈ parts), is_antichain G.adj s)
/-- Whether a partition `P` has at most `n` parts. A graph with a partition
satisfying this predicate called `n`-partite. (See `simple_graph.partitionable`.) -/
def partition.parts_card_le {G : simple_graph V} (P : G.partition) (n : ℕ) : Prop :=
∃ (h : P.parts.finite), h.to_finset.card ≤ n
/-- Whether a graph is `n`-partite, which is whether its vertex set
can be partitioned in at most `n` independent sets. -/
def partitionable (n : ℕ) : Prop :=
∃ (P : G.partition), P.parts_card_le n
namespace partition
variables {G} (P : G.partition)
/-- The part in the partition that `v` belongs to -/
def part_of_vertex (v : V) : set V :=
classical.some (P.is_partition.2 v)
lemma part_of_vertex_mem (v : V) : P.part_of_vertex v ∈ P.parts :=
by { obtain ⟨h, -⟩ := (P.is_partition.2 v).some_spec.1, exact h, }
lemma mem_part_of_vertex (v : V) : v ∈ P.part_of_vertex v :=
by { obtain ⟨⟨h1, h2⟩, h3⟩ := (P.is_partition.2 v).some_spec, exact h2.1 }
lemma part_of_vertex_ne_of_adj {v w : V} (h : G.adj v w) :
P.part_of_vertex v ≠ P.part_of_vertex w :=
begin
intro hn,
have hw := P.mem_part_of_vertex w,
rw ←hn at hw,
exact P.independent _ (P.part_of_vertex_mem v) (P.mem_part_of_vertex v) hw (G.ne_of_adj h) h,
end
/-- Create a coloring using the parts themselves as the colors.
Each vertex is colored by the part it's contained in. -/
def to_coloring : G.coloring P.parts :=
coloring.mk (λ v, ⟨P.part_of_vertex v, P.part_of_vertex_mem v⟩) $ λ _ _ hvw,
by { rw [ne.def, subtype.mk_eq_mk], exact P.part_of_vertex_ne_of_adj hvw }
/-- Like `simple_graph.partition.to_coloring` but uses `set V` as the coloring type. -/
def to_coloring' : G.coloring (set V) :=
coloring.mk P.part_of_vertex $ λ _ _ hvw, P.part_of_vertex_ne_of_adj hvw
lemma to_colorable [fintype P.parts] : G.colorable (fintype.card P.parts) :=
P.to_coloring.to_colorable
end partition
variables {G}
/-- Creates a partition from a coloring. -/
@[simps]
def coloring.to_partition {α : Type v} (C : G.coloring α) : G.partition :=
{ parts := C.color_classes,
is_partition := C.color_classes_is_partition,
independent := begin
rintros s ⟨c, rfl⟩,
apply C.color_classes_independent,
end }
/-- The partition where every vertex is in its own part. -/
@[simps] instance : inhabited (partition G) := ⟨G.self_coloring.to_partition⟩
lemma partitionable_iff_colorable {n : ℕ} :
G.partitionable n ↔ G.colorable n :=
begin
split,
{ rintro ⟨P, hf, h⟩,
haveI : fintype P.parts := hf.fintype,
rw set.finite.card_to_finset at h,
apply P.to_colorable.mono h, },
{ rintro ⟨C⟩,
refine ⟨C.to_partition, C.color_classes_finite, le_trans _ (fintype.card_fin n).le⟩,
generalize_proofs h,
haveI : fintype C.color_classes := C.color_classes_finite.fintype,
rw h.card_to_finset,
exact C.card_color_classes_le },
end
end simple_graph
|
490f87f9e93428f2a4166e8a438a4eb8a3e2cd81 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/data/rat/floor.lean | 40182da92fe3389ca1892a7583c4993407da69b8 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,122 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Kevin Kappelmann
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.algebra.floor
import Mathlib.tactic.field_simp
import Mathlib.PostPort
namespace Mathlib
/-!
# Floor Function for Rational Numbers
## Summary
We define the `floor` function and the `floor_ring` instance on `ℚ`. Some technical lemmas relating
`floor` to integer division and modulo arithmetic are derived as well as some simple inequalities.
## Tags
rat, rationals, ℚ, floor
-/
namespace rat
/-- `floor q` is the largest integer `z` such that `z ≤ q` -/
protected def floor : ℚ → ℤ :=
sorry
protected theorem le_floor {z : ℤ} {r : ℚ} : z ≤ rat.floor r ↔ ↑z ≤ r := sorry
protected instance floor_ring : floor_ring ℚ :=
floor_ring.mk rat.floor rat.le_floor
protected theorem floor_def {q : ℚ} : floor q = num q / ↑(denom q) :=
cases_on q
fun (q_num : ℤ) (q_denom : ℕ) (q_pos : 0 < q_denom) (q_cop : nat.coprime (int.nat_abs q_num) q_denom) =>
Eq.refl (floor (mk' q_num q_denom q_pos q_cop))
theorem floor_int_div_nat_eq_div {n : ℤ} {d : ℕ} : floor (↑n / ↑d) = n / ↑d := sorry
end rat
theorem int.mod_nat_eq_sub_mul_floor_rat_div {n : ℤ} {d : ℕ} : n % ↑d = n - ↑d * floor (↑n / ↑d) :=
eq.mpr (id (Eq._oldrec (Eq.refl (n % ↑d = n - ↑d * floor (↑n / ↑d))) (eq_sub_of_add_eq (int.mod_add_div n ↑d))))
(eq.mpr (id (Eq._oldrec (Eq.refl (n - ↑d * (n / ↑d) = n - ↑d * floor (↑n / ↑d))) rat.floor_int_div_nat_eq_div))
(Eq.refl (n - ↑d * (n / ↑d))))
theorem nat.coprime_sub_mul_floor_rat_div_of_coprime {n : ℕ} {d : ℕ} (n_coprime_d : nat.coprime n d) : nat.coprime (int.nat_abs (↑n - ↑d * floor (↑n / ↑d))) d := sorry
namespace rat
theorem num_lt_succ_floor_mul_denom (q : ℚ) : num q < (floor q + 1) * ↑(denom q) := sorry
theorem fract_inv_num_lt_num_of_pos {q : ℚ} (q_pos : 0 < q) : num (fract (q⁻¹)) < num q := sorry
|
b277487bc5dd41c6c418b2256e239c2378cac8b9 | a0e23cfdd129a671bf3154ee1a8a3a72bf4c7940 | /stage0/src/Lean/Data/Lsp/Diagnostics.lean | a22bb4cd055b70384bd873bbc1d35dd21f9a3880 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | WojciechKarpiel/lean4 | 7f89706b8e3c1f942b83a2c91a3a00b05da0e65b | f6e1314fa08293dea66a329e05b6c196a0189163 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,633,402,214 | 1,625,821,189,000 | 1,625,821,258,000 | 384,640,886 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,625,903,617,000 | 1,625,903,026,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,962 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Marc Huisinga. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Marc Huisinga, Wojciech Nawrocki
-/
import Lean.Data.Json
import Lean.Data.Lsp.Basic
import Lean.Data.Lsp.Utf16
import Lean.Message
/-! Definitions and functionality for emitting diagnostic information
such as errors, warnings and #command outputs from the LSP server. -/
namespace Lean
namespace Lsp
open Json
inductive DiagnosticSeverity where
| error | warning | information | hint
deriving Inhabited, BEq
instance : FromJson DiagnosticSeverity := ⟨fun j =>
match j.getNat? with
| Except.ok 1 => DiagnosticSeverity.error
| Except.ok 2 => DiagnosticSeverity.warning
| Except.ok 3 => DiagnosticSeverity.information
| Except.ok 4 => DiagnosticSeverity.hint
| _ => throw "unknown DiagnosticSeverity"⟩
instance : ToJson DiagnosticSeverity := ⟨fun
| DiagnosticSeverity.error => 1
| DiagnosticSeverity.warning => 2
| DiagnosticSeverity.information => 3
| DiagnosticSeverity.hint => 4⟩
inductive DiagnosticCode where
| int (i : Int)
| string (s : String)
deriving Inhabited, BEq
instance : FromJson DiagnosticCode := ⟨fun
| num (i : Int) => DiagnosticCode.int i
| str s => DiagnosticCode.string s
| _ => throw "the diagnostic code can only be a string or an integer"⟩
instance : ToJson DiagnosticCode := ⟨fun
| DiagnosticCode.int i => i
| DiagnosticCode.string s => s⟩
inductive DiagnosticTag where
| unnecessary
| deprecated
deriving Inhabited, BEq
instance : FromJson DiagnosticTag := ⟨fun j =>
match j.getNat? with
| Except.ok 1 => DiagnosticTag.unnecessary
| Except.ok 2 => DiagnosticTag.deprecated
| _ => throw "unknown DiagnosticTag"⟩
instance : ToJson DiagnosticTag := ⟨fun
| DiagnosticTag.unnecessary => (1 : Nat)
| DiagnosticTag.deprecated => (2 : Nat)⟩
structure DiagnosticRelatedInformation where
location : Location
message : String
deriving Inhabited, BEq, ToJson, FromJson
structure Diagnostic where
range : Range
/-- extension: preserve semantic range of errors when truncating them for display purposes -/
fullRange : Range := range
severity? : Option DiagnosticSeverity := none
code? : Option DiagnosticCode := none
source? : Option String := none
message : String
tags? : Option (Array DiagnosticTag) := none
relatedInformation? : Option (Array DiagnosticRelatedInformation) := none
deriving Inhabited, BEq, ToJson, FromJson
structure PublishDiagnosticsParams where
uri : DocumentUri
version? : Option Int := none
diagnostics: Array Diagnostic
deriving Inhabited, BEq, ToJson, FromJson
/-- Transform a Lean Message concerning the given text into an LSP Diagnostic. -/
def msgToDiagnostic (text : FileMap) (m : Message) : IO Diagnostic := do
let low : Lsp.Position := text.leanPosToLspPos m.pos
let fullHigh := text.leanPosToLspPos <| m.endPos.getD m.pos
let high : Lsp.Position := match m.endPos with
| some endPos =>
/-
Truncate messages that are more than one line long.
This is a workaround to avoid big blocks of "red squiggly lines" on VS Code.
TODO: should it be a parameter?
-/
let endPos := if endPos.line > m.pos.line then { line := m.pos.line + 1, column := 0 } else endPos
text.leanPosToLspPos endPos
| none => low
let range : Range := ⟨low, high⟩
let fullRange : Range := ⟨low, fullHigh⟩
let severity := match m.severity with
| MessageSeverity.information => DiagnosticSeverity.information
| MessageSeverity.warning => DiagnosticSeverity.warning
| MessageSeverity.error => DiagnosticSeverity.error
let source := "Lean 4 server"
let message ← m.data.toString
pure {
range := range
fullRange := fullRange
severity? := severity
source? := source
message := message
}
end Lsp
end Lean
|
d8b38bf956a42299556d90f3ad8dc61398a685ff | e06332abb44b4720a102c91b393254505e242022 | /chapter1.hlean | 39296d8f55b0a376e2ed80a11e898b20800b7a6e | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LicenseRef-scancode-unknown-license-reference"
] | permissive | 11Kilobytes/hott-exercises-lean | 69501ee7fef64cb8669384d4356d43941c75a702 | a859755be688d3f22f14fbdfa35f5f5c32c438d3 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,265,681,636 | 1,455,643,818,000 | 1,455,643,818,000 | 48,048,788 | 1 | 1 | null | 1,455,643,819,000 | 1,450,190,626,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 15,081 | hlean | -- Copyright 2015 Kabelo Moiloa
-- Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
-- you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
-- You may obtain a copy of the License at
-- http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
-- Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
-- distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
-- WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
-- See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
-- limitations under the License.
import algebra.ring
import function
open sigma
open prod
open eq
section ex2
section sigma
open sigma.ops
variables {A : Type} {B : A → Type} {C : Type} (f : Π (a : A), B(a) → C)
definition sigma_rec (p : Σ (x : A), B x) : C :=
f (pr₁ p) (pr₂ p)
theorem sigma_comp (a : A) (p : B a) : sigma_rec f ⟨a, p⟩ = (f a p) :=
rfl
end sigma
section prod
open prod.ops
variables {A : Type} {B : Type} {C : Type} (f : A → B → C)
definition prod_rec (p : A × B) : C :=
f (pr₁ p) (pr₂ p)
definition prod_comp (a : A) (b : B) : prod_rec f (a, b) = (f a b) :=
rfl
end prod
end ex2
section ex3
section sigma
open sigma.ops
variables {A : Type} {B : A → Type} {C : (Σ (x : A), B x) → Type}
(f : Π (a : A) (b : B a), C ⟨a, b⟩)
definition sigma_ind (p : Σ (x : A), B x) : C p :=
(sigma.eta p) ▸ (f (pr₁ p) (pr₂ p))
theorem sigma_ind_comp (a : A) (b : B a) : sigma_ind f ⟨a, b⟩ = (f a b) :=
rfl
end sigma
section prod
open prod.ops
variables {A : Type} {B : Type} {C : A × B → Type} (f : Π (a : A) (b : B), C (a, b))
definition prod_ind (p : A × B) : C p :=
(prod.eta p) ▸ (f (pr₁ p) (pr₂ p))
definition prod_ind_comp (a : A) (b : B) : prod_ind f (a, b) = (f a b) := rfl
end prod
end ex3
open prod.ops
open nat
definition iter {C : Type} (c₀ : C) (cS : C → C) : ℕ → C
| iter 0 := c₀
| iter (succ n) := cS (iter n)
section ex4
variables {C : Type} (c₀ : C) (cS : ℕ → C → C)
definition rec_pair : ℕ → ℕ × C :=
iter (0, c₀) (λ x, (succ (pr₁ x), cS (pr₁ x) (pr₂ x)))
definition rec' (n : ℕ) : C := pr₂ (rec_pair c₀ cS n)
theorem rec_comp₁ : rec' c₀ cS 0 = c₀ := rfl
lemma rec_pr₁ (n : ℕ) : pr₁ (rec_pair c₀ cS n) = n :=
nat.rec_on n
(show pr₁ (rec_pair c₀ cS 0) = 0, from rfl)
(take n,
assume IH : pr₁ (rec_pair c₀ cS n) = n,
show (pr₁ (rec_pair c₀ cS (succ n)) = (succ n)), from
calc pr₁ (rec_pair c₀ cS (succ n))
= pr₁ (succ (pr₁ (rec_pair c₀ cS n)), _) : rfl
... = succ (pr₁ (rec_pair c₀ cS n)) : rfl
... = succ n : ap succ IH)
theorem rec_comp₂ (n : ℕ) : rec' c₀ cS (succ n) = cS n (rec' c₀ cS n) :=
nat.rec_on n
(show rec' c₀ cS (succ 0) = cS 0 (rec' c₀ cS 0), from rfl)
(take n,
assume IH : rec' c₀ cS (succ n) = cS n (rec' c₀ cS n),
show rec' c₀ cS (succ (succ n)) = cS (succ n) (rec' c₀ cS (succ n)), from
calc rec' c₀ cS (succ (succ n))
= pr₂ (rec_pair c₀ cS (succ (succ n))) : rfl
... = cS (pr₁ (rec_pair c₀ cS (succ n)))
(pr₂ (rec_pair c₀ cS (succ n))) : rfl
... = cS (succ n) (pr₂ (rec_pair c₀ cS (succ n))) : { rec_pr₁ c₀ cS (succ n) }
... = cS (succ n) (rec' c₀ cS (succ n)) : { IH })
end ex4
namespace ex5
open sigma.ops bool
definition union.{u v} (A : Type.{u}) (B : Type.{v}) : Type.{max u v} :=
Σ (x : bool), (bool.rec_on x (lift A) (lift B))
infix ` +₂ `:65 := union
variables {A : Type} {B : Type}
definition inl (a : A) : A +₂ B := ⟨ff, (lift.up a)⟩
definition inr (b : B) : A +₂ B := ⟨tt, (lift.up b)⟩
variables {C : A +₂ B → Type} (rec_l : Π (a : A), C (inl a)) (rec_r : Π (b : B), C (inr b))
definition union_ind : Π (x : A +₂ B), C x
| union_ind ⟨ff, a⟩ := (lift.up_down a) ▸ (rec_l (lift.down a))
| union_ind ⟨tt, b⟩ := (lift.up_down b) ▸ (rec_r (lift.down b))
theorem union_comp₁ (a : A) : (union_ind rec_l rec_r (inl a)) = (rec_l a) :=
by reflexivity
theorem union_comp₂ (b : B) : (union_ind rec_l rec_r (inr b)) = (rec_r b) :=
by reflexivity
end ex5
section ex6
open sigma.ops bool
definition product.{u v} (A : Type.{u}) (B : Type.{v}) : Type.{max u v} :=
Π (x : bool), (bool.rec_on x (lift A) (lift B))
infix ` ×₂ `:65 := product
variables {A : Type} {B : Type}
definition make_pair (a : A) (b : B) : A ×₂ B := (bool.rec (lift.up a) (lift.up b))
definition proj₁ (p : A ×₂ B) : A := (lift.down (p ff))
definition proj₂ (p : A ×₂ B) : B := (lift.down (p tt))
definition product_eta (p : A ×₂ B) : (make_pair (proj₁ p) (proj₂ p)) = p :=
eq_of_homotopy
(take x : bool,
match x with
| tt := !lift.up_down
| ff := !lift.up_down
end)
variables {C : A ×₂ B → Type} (f : Π (a : A) (b : B), C (make_pair a b))
definition product_ind (p : A ×₂ B) : C p :=
(product_eta p) ▸ (f (proj₁ p) (proj₂ p))
definition product_comp (a : A) (b : B) : (product_ind f (make_pair a b)) = (f a b) :=
assert p : (λ x, bool.rec_on x rfl rfl) = (λ x, refl (make_pair a b x)),
from eq_of_homotopy (bool.rec rfl rfl),
calc
product_ind f (make_pair a b)
= eq_of_homotopy (λ x, bool.rec_on x rfl rfl) ▸ f a b : rfl
... = transport C (eq_of_homotopy (λ x, rfl)) (f a b) : by rewrite p
... = refl (make_pair a b) ▸ f a b : by rewrite eq_of_homotopy_idp
... = f a b : rfl
end ex6
section ex7
open sigma.ops
variables {A : Type} (a : A) {P : Π (x : A), a = x → Type} {d : P a (refl a)}
definition contr_components (x y : A) (p : x = y) : ⟨x, (refl x)⟩ = ⟨y, p⟩ :=
eq.rec_on' p (λ a, rfl)
definition contr_path_space (a : A) (s : Σ (y : A), a = y) : ⟨a, (refl a)⟩ = s :=
(sigma.eta s) ▸ contr_components a (pr₁ s) (pr₂ s)
definition eq_ind (x : A) (p : a = x) : P x p :=
transport (λ s, P (pr₁ s) (pr₂ s)) (contr_path_space a ⟨x, p⟩) d
definition eq_comp : eq_ind a a (refl a) = a := rfl
end ex7
section ex8
open nat
definition exp : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ
| exp x 0 := 1
| exp x (succ n) := x * exp x n
definition exp' : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ := function.flip (nat.rec (λ n, 1) (λ n f x, x * f x))
theorem add_zero (a : ℕ) : a + 0 = a := rfl
theorem zero_add (a : ℕ) : 0 + a = a :=
nat.rec_on a
(show 0 + 0 = 0, from rfl)
(take a,
assume IH : 0 + a = a,
show 0 + (succ a) = (succ a), from
calc 0 + (succ a) = (succ (0 + a)) : rfl
... = (succ a) : ap succ IH)
theorem add_assoc (a b c : ℕ) : (a + b) + c = a + (b + c) :=
nat.rec_on c
(show (a + b) + 0 = a + (b + 0), from rfl)
(take n,
assume IH : (a + b) + n = a + (b + n),
show (a + b) + (succ n) = a + (b + (succ n)), from
calc (a + b) + (succ n) = succ ((a + b) + n) : rfl
... = succ (a + (b + n)) : ap succ IH
... = a + (succ (b + n)) : rfl
... = a + (b + (succ n)) : rfl)
theorem one_add (a : ℕ) : (succ a) = 1 + a :=
nat.rec_on a
(show (succ 0) = 1 + 0, from rfl)
(take a,
assume IH : (succ a) = 1 + a,
show (succ (succ a)) = 1 + (succ a), from
calc (succ (succ a)) = (succ a) + 1 : rfl
... = (1 + a) + 1 : { IH }
... = 1 + (a + 1) : add_assoc 1 a 1
... = 1 + (succ a) : rfl)
theorem add_comm (a b : ℕ) : a + b = b + a :=
nat.rec_on b
(show a + 0 = 0 + a, from (zero_add a)⁻¹)
(take b,
assume IH : a + b = b + a,
show a + (succ b) = (succ b) + a, from
calc a + (succ b) = (succ (a + b)) : rfl
... = (succ (b + a)) : ap succ IH
... = 1 + (b + a) : one_add (b + a)
... = (1 + b) + a : add_assoc 1 b a
... = (succ b) + a : { (one_add b)⁻¹ })
theorem one_mul (a : ℕ) : 1 * a = a :=
nat.rec_on a
(show 1 * 0 = 0, from rfl)
(take a,
assume IH : 1 * a = a,
show 1 * (succ a) = (succ a), from
calc 1 * (succ a) = (1 * a) + 1 : rfl
... = a + 1 : { IH }
... = (succ a) : rfl)
theorem mul_one (a : ℕ) : a * 1 = a :=
calc a * 1 = (a * 0) + a : rfl
... = 0 + a : rfl
... = a : zero_add a
theorem zero_mul (a : ℕ) : 0 * a = 0 :=
nat.rec_on a
(show 0 * 0 = 0, from rfl)
(take a,
assume IH : 0 * a = 0,
show 0 * (succ a) = 0, from
calc 0 * (succ a) = 0 * a + 0 : rfl
... = 0 + 0 : { IH }
... = 0 : rfl)
theorem mul_zero (a : ℕ) : a * 0 = 0 := rfl
theorem right_distrib (a b c : ℕ) : (a + b) * c = a * c + b * c :=
nat.rec_on c
(show (a + b) * 0 = a * 0 + b * 0, from rfl)
(take c,
assume IH : (a + b) * c = a * c + b * c,
show (a + b) * (succ c) = a * (succ c) + b * (succ c), from
calc
(a + b) * (succ c)
= ((a + b) * c) + (a + b) : rfl
... = (a * c + b * c) + (a + b) : { IH }
... = a * c + (b * c + (a + b)) : { add_assoc (a * c) (b * c) (a + b) }
... = a * c + (b * c + (b + a)) : { add_comm a b }
... = a * c + ((b * c + b) + a) : { (add_assoc (b * c) b a)⁻¹ }
... = a * c + (b * (succ c) + a) : rfl
... = a * c + (a + b * (succ c)) : { add_comm (b * (succ c)) a }
... = (a * c + a) + b * (succ c) : (add_assoc (a * c) a (b * (succ c)))⁻¹
... = a * (succ c) + b * (succ c) : rfl)
lemma succ_mul (a b : ℕ) : (succ a) * b = a * b + b :=
nat.rec_on b
(show (succ a) * 0 = a * 0 + 0, from rfl)
(take b,
assume IH : (succ a) * b = a * b + b,
show (succ a) * (succ b) = a * (succ b) + (succ b), from
calc (succ a) * (succ b) = (succ a) * b + (succ a) : rfl
... = (a * b + b) + (succ a) : { IH }
... = a * b + (b + (succ a)) : add_assoc (a * b) b (succ a)
... = a * b + (b + (1 + a)) : { one_add a }
... = a * b + ((b + 1) + a) : { (add_assoc b 1 a)⁻¹ }
... = a * b + ((succ b) + a) : rfl
... = a * b + (a + (succ b)) : { add_comm (succ b) a }
... = (a * b + a) + (succ b) : (add_assoc (a * b) a (succ b))⁻¹
... = a * (succ b) + (succ b) : rfl)
theorem mul_comm (a b : ℕ) : a * b = b * a :=
nat.rec_on b
(show a * 0 = 0 * a, from
calc a * 0 = 0 : rfl
... = 0 * a : (zero_mul a)⁻¹)
(take b,
assume IH : a * b = b * a,
show a * (succ b) = (succ b) * a, from
calc a * (succ b) = a * b + a : rfl
... = b * a + a : { IH }
... = (succ b) * a : (succ_mul b a)⁻¹)
theorem left_distrib (a b c : ℕ) : a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c :=
nat.rec_on c
(show a * (b + 0) = a * b + a * 0, by reflexivity)
(take c,
assume IH : a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c,
show a * (b + (succ c)) = a * b + a * (succ c), from
calc a * (b + (succ c)) = a * (succ (b + c)) : rfl
... = a * (b + c) + a : rfl
... = (a * b + a * c) + a : { IH }
... = a * b + (a * c + a) : add_assoc (a * b) (a * c) a
... = a * b + a * (succ c) : rfl)
theorem mul_assoc (a b c : ℕ) : (a * b) * c = a * (b * c) :=
nat.rec_on c
(show (a * b) * 0 = a * (b * 0), by reflexivity)
(take c,
assume IH : (a * b) * c = a * (b * c),
show (a * b) * (succ c) = a * (b * (succ c)), from
calc (a * b) * (succ c) = (a * b) * c + a * b : rfl
... = a * (b * c) + a * b : { IH }
... = a * ((b * c) + b) : { (left_distrib a (b * c) b)⁻¹ }
... = a * (b * (succ c)) : rfl)
definition semiring := {| algebra.semiring ℕ,
is_hset_carrier := is_set_of_decidable_eq,
add := add,
mul := mul,
zero := 0,
add_zero := add_zero,
zero_add := zero_add,
add_comm := add_comm,
add_assoc := add_assoc,
one_mul := one_mul,
mul_one := mul_one,
zero_mul := zero_mul,
mul_zero := mul_zero,
left_distrib := left_distrib,
right_distrib := right_distrib,
mul_assoc := mul_assoc |}
end ex8
section ex9
definition less_than (x : ℕ) (y : ℕ) := Σ (d : ℕ), x + (succ d) = y
notation x `<₂` y := less_than x y
definition Fin (n : ℕ) := Σ (x : ℕ), x <₂ n
definition fmax : Π (n : ℕ), Fin (succ n)
| fmax 0 := ⟨0, ⟨0, rfl⟩⟩
| fmax (succ n) := ⟨n, ⟨1, rfl⟩⟩
end ex9
section ex10
definition ack : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ :=
nat.rec (λ n, succ n)
(λ m ackₘ, nat.rec (ackₘ 1) (λ n ackₛₘn, ackₘ ackₛₘn))
theorem comp₁ (n : ℕ) : ack 0 n = succ n := rfl
theorem comp₂ (m : ℕ) : ack (succ m) 0 = ack m 1 := rfl
theorem comp₃ (m n : ℕ) : ack (succ m) (succ n) = ack m (ack (succ m) n) := rfl
end ex10
section ex11
definition dn_not {A : Type} (not³A : ¬¬¬A) : ¬A :=
(suppose a : A,
have ¬¬A, from (suppose notA : ¬A, notA a),
not³A this)
end ex11
section ex12
definition B_implies_A_of_A {A B C : Type} (a : A) : B → A :=
(take b, show A, from a)
definition not_not_A_of_A {A : Type} (a : A) : ¬¬A :=
(suppose notA : ¬A,
notA a)
theorem dm {A B : Type} (p : (¬A) + (¬B)) : ¬(A × B) :=
assume q,
obtain (a b), from q,
sum.cases_on p
(assume notA, notA a)
(assume notB, notB b)
end ex12
section ex13
theorem not_not_dn {P : Type} : ¬¬(P + (¬P)) :=
assume notDecP : ¬(P + (¬P)),
assert decP : P + (¬P), from sum.inr (assume p : P, notDecP (sum.inl p)),
notDecP decP
end ex13
section ex14
theorem indiscernibility {A : Type} {C : A → Type} {x y : A} (p : x = y) : C(x) → C(y) :=
eq.rec_on p id
end ex14
|
acf3cff3731cbee04170e323cb95aed7e3da047c | efa51dd2edbbbbd6c34bd0ce436415eb405832e7 | /20161026_ICTAC_Tutorial/ex22.lean | 74f6c4efc599ea98a5fcdc8c73003639f418e07e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover/presentations | dd031a05bcb12c8855676c77e52ed84246bd889a | 3ce2d132d299409f1de269fa8e95afa1333d644e | refs/heads/master | 1,688,703,388,796 | 1,686,838,383,000 | 1,687,465,742,000 | 29,750,158 | 12 | 9 | Apache-2.0 | 1,540,211,670,000 | 1,422,042,683,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 329 | lean | namespace hide
universe variable u
constant list : Type u → Type u
constant cons : Π A : Type u, A → list A → list A
constant nil : Π A : Type u, list A
constant head : Π A : Type u, list A → A
constant tail : Π A : Type u, list A → list A
constant append : Π A : Type u, list A → list A → list A
end hide
|
0d143238407b64666a0721fdef41729503408d1a | be853a09b5de8ba4d9114bd8a816647b584d4573 | /src/submissions/practice_2.lean | a72c67d9246ebe831a3b7882e5258854782f8677 | [] | no_license | sgoldberg02/cs2120f21mycopy | 4a665a92c5dcbb5b35be5461c42268c74366e3fa | 216fa0a813508d82594ac95aec0a048249f81291 | refs/heads/main | 1,692,136,103,389 | 1,632,328,880,000 | 1,632,328,880,000 | 405,192,256 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,954 | lean | /-
Prove the following simple logical conjectures.
Give a formal and an English proof of each one.
Your English language proofs should be complete
in the sense that they identify all the axioms
and/or theorems that you use.
-/
example : true := true.intro
-- example : false := _ -- trick question? why?
example : ∀ (P : Prop), P ∨ P ↔ P :=
begin
assume P,
apply iff.intro _ _,
assume pp,
cases pp,
exact pp,
exact pp,
assume p,
exact (or.intro_left P p),
end
/-
Assume that we have a proposition P. Since we are trying to prove
P ∨ P ↔ P, it suffices to prove P ∨ P → P and P → P ∨ P. To prove P ∨ P → P,
assume that P ∨ P is true. Then, we have two cases. In the first case, P is true, which
is exactly what we are trying to prove. In the second case, P is true,
which is exactly what we are trying to prove.
To prove P → P ∨ P, assume that P is true. Then, since it suffices to prove
just the left side of P ∨ P, we are done because that is exactly P.
-/
example : ∀ (P : Prop), P ∧ P ↔ P :=
begin
assume P,
apply iff.intro _ _,
assume pp,
exact (and.elim_right pp),
assume p,
exact (and.intro p p),
end
/-
Assume that we have a proposition P. Since we are trying to prove P ∧ P ↔ P,
it suffices to prove P ∧ P → P and P → P ∧ P via the introduction rule for iff.
To prove P ∧ P → P, assume P ∧ P is true. Then, because P is
what we want to prove and this is exactly the right side of P ∧ P, we are done.
To prove P → P ∧ P, assume P is true. Because we have a proof of P ∧ P from
knowing P is true using the introduction rule for and,
and this is exactly a proof of our proposition P ∧ P, we are done.
-/
example : ∀ (P Q : Prop), P ∨ Q ↔ Q ∨ P :=
begin
assume P,
assume Q,
apply iff.intro _ _,
assume pq,
cases pq,
exact (or.inr pq),
exact (or.inl pq),
assume pq,
cases pq,
exact (or.inr pq),
exact (or.inl pq),
end
/-
Assume we have propositions P and Q. Since we are trying to prove P ∧ Q ↔ Q ∧ P,
it suffices to show P ∨ Q → Q ∨ P and Q ∨ P → P ∨ Q. To show P ∨ Q → Q ∨ P,
we assume P ∨ Q is true. We have two cases. In the first case, P is true, so that
we are done because this is exactly the right side of Q ∨ P. In the second case,
Q is true, so that we are done because this is exactly the left side of Q ∨ P.
To show Q ∨ P → P ∨ Q, we assume Q ∨ P is true. We have two cases. In the first case,
Q is true, so that we are done because this is exactly the right side of P ∨ Q.
In the second case, P is true, so that we are done because this is exactly the left
side of P ∨ Q.
-/
example : ∀ (P Q : Prop), P ∧ Q ↔ Q ∧ P :=
begin
assume P Q,
apply iff.intro _ _,
assume pq,
apply and.intro _ _,
exact (and.elim_right pq),
exact (and.elim_left pq),
assume pq,
apply and.intro _ _,
exact (and.elim_right pq),
exact (and.elim_left pq),
end
/-
Assume we have propositions P Q. Since we wish to show P ∧ Q ↔ Q ∧ P, it suffices to
show that P ∧ Q → Q ∧ P and Q ∧ P → P ∧ Q. To show P ∧ Q → Q ∧ P, assume P ∧ Q is true.
Then, it suffices to prove Q and P seperately. To prove Q, we are done because this is
exactly the right side of P ∧ Q. To prove P, we are done because this is exactly the left
side of P ∧ Q.
To prove Q ∧ P → P ∧ Q, assume Q ∧ P is true. Then, it suffices to prove P and Q seprately.
To prove P, we are done because this is exactly the right side of Q ∧ P. To prove Q, we
are done because this is exactly the left side of Q ∧ P.
-/
example : ∀ (P Q R : Prop), P ∧ (Q ∨ R) ↔ (P ∧ Q) ∨ (P ∧ R) :=
begin
assume P Q R,
apply iff.intro _ _,
assume pqr,
have p : P := and.elim_left pqr,
have qr : Q ∨ R := and.elim_right pqr,
cases qr,
have pq : P ∧ Q := and.intro p qr,
exact (or.inl pq),
have pr : P ∧ R := and.intro p qr,
exact (or.inr pr),
assume pqpr,
cases pqpr,
apply and.intro _ _,
exact (and.elim_left pqpr),
have q : Q := and.elim_right pqpr,
exact (or.inl q),
apply and.intro _ _,
exact (and.elim_left pqpr),
have r : R := and.elim_right pqpr,
exact (or.inr r),
end
/-
Assume we have propositions P Q and R. Since we want to prove P ∧ (Q ∨ R) ↔ (P ∧ Q) ∨ (P ∧ R),
it suffices to show P ∧ (Q ∨ R) → (P ∧ Q) ∨ (P ∧ R) and (P ∧ Q) ∨ (P ∧ R) → P ∧ (Q ∨ R).
to prove P ∧ (Q ∨ R) → (P ∧ Q) ∨ (P ∧ R), assume P ∧ (Q ∨ R) is true. Then, we have a proof of
P and a proof of Q ∨ R. For our proof of Q ∨ R, we have two cases. In the first case, Q is true,
so that we have a proof of P ∧ Q and are done because that is precisely the left hand side of
(P ∧ Q) ∨ (P ∧ R). In the second case of Q ∨ R, we have a proof of R, so that we have a proof of
P ∧ R and are done because that is precisely the right hand side of (P ∧ Q) ∨ (P ∧ R).
To prove (P ∧ Q) ∨ (P ∧ R) → P ∧ (Q ∨ R), assume we have a proof of (P ∧ Q) ∨ (P ∧ R) → P ∧ (Q ∨ R).
Then, we have two cases. In the first case, P ∧ Q is true. It suffices to prove P and Q ∨ R seprately.
To see why P is true, we are done because this is precisely the left side of P ∧ Q. Now, we obtain
a proof that Q is true from the proof of P ∧ Q, so that we are done because this is precisely
the left side of P ∨ Q. In the second case, P ∧ R is true. It suffices to prove P and Q ∨ R seprately.
To see why P is true, we are done because this is exactly the left side of P ∧ R. Now, we obtain of proof
of R from the right side of P ∧ R and are done because this is precisely the right side of Q ∨ R.
-/
example : ∀ (P Q R : Prop), P ∨ (Q ∧ R) ↔ (P ∨ Q) ∧ (P ∨ R) :=
begin
assume P Q R,
apply iff.intro _ _,
assume pqr,
cases pqr,
apply and.intro _ _,
exact (or.inl pqr),
exact (or.inl pqr),
have q : Q := and.elim_left pqr,
have r : R := and.elim_right pqr,
apply and.intro _ _,
exact (or.inr q),
exact (or.inr r),
assume pqpr,
have pq : P ∨ Q := and.elim_left pqpr,
have pr : P ∨ R := and.elim_right pqpr,
cases pq,
exact (or.inl pq),
cases pr,
exact (or.inl pr),
have qr : Q ∧ R := and.intro pq pr,
exact (or.inr qr),
end
/-
Assume we have propositions P Q R. Since we wish to prove P ∨ (Q ∧ R) ↔ (P ∨ Q) ∧ (P ∨ R),
we can just show P ∨ (Q ∧ R) → (P ∨ Q) ∧ (P ∨ R) and (P ∨ Q) ∧ (P ∨ R) → P ∨ (Q ∧ R). To see why
P ∨ (Q ∧ R) → (P ∨ Q) ∧ (P ∨ R) is true, assume P ∨ ( Q ∧ R) is true. Then, we have two cases.
In the first case, P is true. To prove (P ∨ Q) ∧ (P ∨ R) is true, we prove P ∨ Q and P ∨ R separately.
To see why P ∨ Q is true, we are done because its left side is exactly P, which we have a proof of.
To see why P ∨ R is true, we are done because its left side is exactly P, which we have a proof of.
To see why (P ∨ Q) ∧ (P ∨ R) → P ∨ (Q ∧ R) is true, assume (P ∨ Q) ∧ (P ∨ R). Now we have a proof of
P ∨ Q and P ∨ R. In the first case of P ∨ Q, P is true, so that we are done because this is the left
side of P ∨ (Q ∧ R). In the second case of P ∨ Q, Q is true. Now, in the first case of P ∨ R, P is true,
so that we are done because this is the left side of P ∨ (Q ∧ R). In the second case of P ∨ R, R is true
so that we have a proof of Q ∧ R, and thus we are done because this is the right side of P ∨ (Q ∧ R).
-/
example : ∀ (P Q : Prop), P ∧ (P ∨ Q) ↔ P :=
begin
assume P,
assume Q,
apply iff.intro _ _,
assume ppq,
exact (and.elim_left ppq),
assume p,
apply and.intro _ _,
exact p,
exact (or.inl p),
end
/-
Assume we have propositions P and Q. Since we want to prove P ∧ (P ∨ Q) ↔ P, it suffices to show
P ∧ (P ∨ Q) → P and P → P ∧ (P ∨ Q). To see why P ∧ (P ∨ Q) → P, assume we have a proof of
P ∧ (P ∨ Q), so that we are done because P is exactly the right hand side of P ∧ (P ∨ Q).
To see why P → P ∧ (P ∨ Q) is true, we assume we have a proof of P. Now, we can prove
P and (P ∨ Q) separately. To see why P is true, we are done beause we have a proof of P. To see
why P ∨ Q is true, we are done because its left side is exactly P, which we have a proof of.
-/
example : ∀ (P Q : Prop), P ∨ (P ∧ Q) ↔ P :=
begin
assume P,
assume Q,
apply iff.intro _ _,
assume ppq,
cases ppq,
exact ppq,
exact (and.elim_left ppq),
assume p,
exact (or.inl p),
end
/-
Assume we have propositions P and Q. To see why P ∨ (P ∧ Q) ↔ P is true, it suffices to prove
P ∨ (P ∧ Q) → P and P → P ∨ (P ∧ Q). To see why P ∨ (P ∧ Q) → P is true, assume we have a proof of
P ∨ (P ∧ Q). Now, we have two cases. In the first case, P is true, so that we are done because P
is what we want to prove. In the second case, P ∧ Q is true, so that we are done because P
is exactly the left hand side of P ∧ Q.
To see why P → P ∨ (P ∧ Q), we assume P is true, and then are done because this is exactly the left side
of P ∨ (P ∧ Q).
-/
example : ∀ (P : Prop), P ∨ true ↔ true :=
begin
assume P,
apply iff.intro _ _,
assume pt,
apply true.intro,
assume t,
exact (or.inr t),
end
/-
Assume we have a proposition P. To see why P ∨ true ↔ true is true, we prove P ∨ true → true
and true → P ∨ true. To see why P ∨ true → true is true, assume P ∨ true is true. Then,
we apply the fact that we know true is true. To see why true → P ∨ true, we assume we have a proof of t.
Then, we are done because we have a proof for the right side of P ∨ true.
-/
example : ∀ (P : Prop), P ∨ false ↔ P :=
begin
assume P,
apply iff.intro _ _,
assume pf,
cases pf,
exact pf,
have pp : ¬ P ∧ P := false.elim pf,
exact (and.elim_right pp),
assume p,
exact (or.inl p),
end
/-
Assume we have a proposition P. To see why P ∨ false ↔ P is true, it suffices to prove
P ∨ false → P and P → P ∨ false. To see why P ∨ false → P is true, assume P ∨ false is true.
Then, we haave two cases. In the first case, we are done because we have a proof for P. In the second case,
we obtain a proof of ¬ P ∧ P from the fact that we have assumed false. Now, we are done because P is exactly
the right side of ¬ P ∧ P. To see why P → P ∨ false, assume P is true. Then, we have are done because we
have a proof of the left side of P ∨ false.
-/
example : ∀ (P : Prop), P ∧ true ↔ P :=
begin
assume P,
apply iff.intro _ _,
assume pt,
exact (and.elim_left pt),
assume p,
apply and.intro _ _,
exact p,
apply true.intro,
end
/-
Assume we have a proposition P. To see why P ∧ true ↔ P, it suffices to prove P ∧ true → P and
P → P ∧ true. To see why P ∧ true → P, we are done because P is the left side of P ∧ true.
To see why P → P ∧ true, we assume P is true and then prove P and true separately. To see why
P is true, we are done because we have a proof of P. To see why true is true, we are done because
we know true is true.
-/
example : ∀ (P : Prop), P ∧ false ↔ false :=
begin
assume P,
apply iff.intro,
assume pf,
exact (and.elim_right pf),
assume f,
apply and.intro _ _,
have pp : ¬ P ∧ P := false.elim f,
exact (and.elim_right pp),
exact f,
end
/-
Assume we have a propositio P. To see why P ∧ false ↔ false is true, we prove
P ∧ false → false and false → P ∧ false. To see why P ∧ false → false is true, we assume
P ∧ false is true. Then, we have prove false because it is the right side of P ∧ false.
To see why false → P ∧ false, we assume false and prove P and false separately.
To prove P, we can get a proof of ¬ P ∧ P from false. Now, we have a proof of P from the right
side of ¬ P ∧ P. To see prove false, we are done because we already have a proof of false.
-/
|
132be342f5d5aa7af357af3cb56ac160ca154780 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/expr_maps.lean | 7f10f3c69e11e9b41e5cdf664d7e48366364d22b | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,931 | lean | import Lean.Expr
open Lean
def exprType : Expr := mkSort levelOne
def biDef := BinderInfo.default
def exprNat := mkConst `Nat []
-- Type -> Type
def TypeArrowType := mkForall `α biDef exprType exprType
-- Type -> Type
def TypeArrowType2 := mkForall `β biDef exprType exprType
-- fun (x : Nat) => x
def exprT1 := mkLambda `x biDef exprNat (mkBVar 0)
-- fun (y : Nat) => x
def exprT2 := mkLambda `y biDef exprNat (mkBVar 0)
-- fun (x : Nat) => (f x)
def exprT3 := mkLambda `x biDef exprNat (mkApp (mkConst `f []) (mkBVar 0))
-- fun (x : Nat) => (f x)
def exprT4 := mkLambda `x BinderInfo.implicit exprNat (mkApp (mkConst `f []) (mkBVar 0))
def check (b : Bool) : IO Unit :=
unless b do throw $ IO.userError "failed"
def tst1 : IO Unit :=
do IO.println TypeArrowType;
IO.println exprT1;
IO.println exprT2;
IO.println exprT3;
IO.println exprT4;
check (TypeArrowType == TypeArrowType2);
check (ExprStructEq.mk TypeArrowType != ExprStructEq.mk TypeArrowType2);
check (!Expr.equal TypeArrowType TypeArrowType2);
check (exprT1 == exprT2);
check (ExprStructEq.mk exprT1 != ExprStructEq.mk exprT2);
check (ExprStructEq.mk exprT1 == ExprStructEq.mk exprT1);
check (exprT3 == exprT4);
check (ExprStructEq.mk exprT3 != ExprStructEq.mk exprT4);
pure ()
#eval tst1
def tst2 : IO Unit :=
do let m1 : ExprMap Nat := {};
let m1 := m1.insert exprT1 10;
check (m1.find? exprT1 == some 10);
check (m1.find? exprT2 == some 10);
check (m1.find? exprT3 == none);
let m1 := m1.insert exprT4 20;
check (m1.find? exprT1 == some 10);
check (m1.find? exprT3 == some 20);
IO.println (m1.find? exprT1);
pure ()
#eval tst2
def tst3 : IO Unit :=
do let m1 : ExprStructMap Nat := {};
let m1 := m1.insert exprT1 10;
check (m1.find? exprT1 == some 10);
check (m1.find? exprT2 == none);
check (m1.find? exprT3 == none);
let m1 := m1.insert exprT4 20;
check (m1.find? exprT1 == some 10);
check (m1.find? exprT4 == some 20);
check (m1.find? exprT3 == none);
IO.println (m1.find? exprT1);
pure ()
#eval tst3
def tst4 : IO Unit :=
do let m1 : PersistentExprMap Nat := {};
let m1 := m1.insert exprT1 10;
check (m1.find? exprT1 == some 10);
check (m1.find? exprT2 == some 10);
check (m1.find? exprT3 == none);
let m1 := m1.insert exprT4 20;
check (m1.find? exprT1 == some 10);
check (m1.find? exprT3 == some 20);
IO.println (m1.find? exprT1);
pure ()
#eval tst4
def tst5 : IO Unit :=
do let m1 : PersistentExprStructMap Nat := {};
let m1 := m1.insert exprT1 10;
check (m1.find? exprT1 == some 10);
check (m1.find? exprT2 == none);
check (m1.find? exprT3 == none);
let m1 := m1.insert exprT4 20;
check (m1.find? exprT1 == some 10);
check (m1.find? exprT4 == some 20);
check (m1.find? exprT3 == none);
IO.println (m1.find? exprT1);
pure ()
#eval tst5
|
92c7654055f57f9f9696827668f9bda01098b23b | 8cb37a089cdb4af3af9d8bf1002b417e407a8e9e | /library/system/io.lean | a21992dde37f13f8406257de8a8daa2baf664cf0 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kbuzzard/lean | ae3c3db4bb462d750dbf7419b28bafb3ec983ef7 | ed1788fd674bb8991acffc8fca585ec746711928 | refs/heads/master | 1,620,983,366,617 | 1,618,937,600,000 | 1,618,937,600,000 | 359,886,396 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,618,936,987,000 | 1,618,936,987,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,114 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Luke Nelson, Jared Roesch and Leonardo de Moura
-/
import system.io_interface
/- The following constants have a builtin implementation -/
constant io_core : Type → Type → Type
/- Auxiliary definition used in the builtin implementation of monad_io_random_impl -/
def io_rand_nat : std_gen → nat → nat → nat × std_gen :=
rand_nat
@[instance] constant monad_io_impl : monad_io io_core
@[instance] constant monad_io_terminal_impl : monad_io_terminal io_core
@[instance] constant monad_io_net_system_impl : monad_io_net_system io_core
@[instance] constant monad_io_file_system_impl : monad_io_file_system io_core
@[instance] meta constant monad_io_serial_impl : monad_io_serial io_core
@[instance] constant monad_io_environment_impl : monad_io_environment io_core
@[instance] constant monad_io_process_impl : monad_io_process io_core
@[instance] constant monad_io_random_impl : monad_io_random io_core
instance io_core_is_monad (e : Type) : monad (io_core e) :=
monad_io_is_monad io_core e
instance io_core_is_monad_fail : monad_fail (io_core io.error) :=
monad_io_is_monad_fail io_core
instance io_core_is_alternative : alternative (io_core io.error) :=
monad_io_is_alternative io_core
@[reducible] def io (α : Type) :=
io_core io.error α
namespace io
/- Remark: the following definitions can be generalized and defined for any (m : Type -> Type -> Type)
that implements the required type classes. However, the generalized versions are very inconvenient to use,
(example: `#eval io.put_str "hello world"` does not work because we don't have enough information to infer `m`.).
-/
def iterate {e α} (a : α) (f : α → io_core e (option α)) : io_core e α :=
monad_io.iterate e α a f
def forever {e} (a : io_core e unit) : io_core e unit :=
iterate () $ λ _, a >> return (some ())
-- TODO(Leo): delete after we merge #1881
def catch {e₁ e₂ α} (a : io_core e₁ α) (b : e₁ → io_core e₂ α) : io_core e₂ α :=
monad_io.catch e₁ e₂ α a b
def finally {α e} (a : io_core e α) (cleanup : io_core e unit) : io_core e α := do
res ← catch (sum.inr <$> a) (return ∘ sum.inl),
cleanup,
match res with
| sum.inr res := return res
| sum.inl error := monad_io.fail _ _ error
end
protected def fail {α : Type} (s : string) : io α :=
monad_io.fail _ _ (io.error.other s)
def put_str : string → io unit :=
monad_io_terminal.put_str
def put_str_ln (s : string) : io unit :=
put_str s >> put_str "\n"
def get_line : io string :=
monad_io_terminal.get_line
def cmdline_args : io (list string) :=
return (monad_io_terminal.cmdline_args io_core)
def print {α} [has_to_string α] (s : α) : io unit :=
put_str ∘ to_string $ s
def print_ln {α} [has_to_string α] (s : α) : io unit :=
print s >> put_str "\n"
def handle : Type :=
monad_io.handle io_core
def mk_file_handle (s : string) (m : mode) (bin : bool := ff) : io handle :=
monad_io_file_system.mk_file_handle s m bin
def stdin : io handle :=
monad_io_file_system.stdin
def stderr : io handle :=
monad_io_file_system.stderr
def stdout : io handle :=
monad_io_file_system.stdout
meta def serialize : handle → expr → io unit :=
monad_io_serial.serialize
meta def deserialize : handle → io expr :=
monad_io_serial.deserialize
namespace env
def get (env_var : string) : io (option string) :=
monad_io_environment.get_env env_var
/-- get the current working directory -/
def get_cwd : io string :=
monad_io_environment.get_cwd
/-- set the current working directory -/
def set_cwd (cwd : string) : io unit :=
monad_io_environment.set_cwd cwd
end env
namespace net
def socket : Type :=
monad_io_net_system.socket io_core
def listen : string → nat → io socket :=
monad_io_net_system.listen
def accept : socket → io socket :=
monad_io_net_system.accept
def connect : string → io socket :=
monad_io_net_system.connect
def recv : socket → nat → io char_buffer :=
monad_io_net_system.recv
def send : socket → char_buffer → io unit :=
monad_io_net_system.send
def close : socket → io unit :=
monad_io_net_system.close
end net
namespace fs
def is_eof : handle → io bool :=
monad_io_file_system.is_eof
def flush : handle → io unit :=
monad_io_file_system.flush
def close : handle → io unit :=
monad_io_file_system.close
def read : handle → nat → io char_buffer :=
monad_io_file_system.read
def write : handle → char_buffer → io unit :=
monad_io_file_system.write
def get_char (h : handle) : io char :=
do b ← read h 1,
if h : b.size = 1 then return $ b.read ⟨0, h.symm ▸ nat.zero_lt_one⟩
else io.fail "get_char failed"
def get_line : handle → io char_buffer :=
monad_io_file_system.get_line
def put_char (h : handle) (c : char) : io unit :=
write h (mk_buffer.push_back c)
def put_str (h : handle) (s : string) : io unit :=
write h (mk_buffer.append_string s)
def put_str_ln (h : handle) (s : string) : io unit :=
put_str h s >> put_str h "\n"
def read_to_end (h : handle) : io char_buffer :=
iterate mk_buffer $ λ r,
do done ← is_eof h,
if done
then return none
else do
c ← read h 1024,
return $ some (r ++ c)
def read_file (s : string) (bin := ff) : io char_buffer :=
do h ← mk_file_handle s io.mode.read bin,
read_to_end h
def file_exists : string → io bool :=
monad_io_file_system.file_exists
def dir_exists : string → io bool :=
monad_io_file_system.dir_exists
def remove : string → io unit :=
monad_io_file_system.remove
def rename : string → string → io unit :=
monad_io_file_system.rename
def mkdir (path : string) (recursive : bool := ff) : io bool :=
monad_io_file_system.mkdir path recursive
def rmdir : string → io bool :=
monad_io_file_system.rmdir
end fs
namespace proc
def child : Type :=
monad_io_process.child io_core
def child.stdin : child → handle :=
monad_io_process.stdin
def child.stdout : child → handle :=
monad_io_process.stdout
def child.stderr : child → handle :=
monad_io_process.stderr
def spawn (p : io.process.spawn_args) : io child :=
monad_io_process.spawn p
def wait (c : child) : io nat :=
monad_io_process.wait c
def sleep (n : nat) : io unit :=
monad_io_process.sleep n
end proc
def set_rand_gen : std_gen → io unit :=
monad_io_random.set_rand_gen
def rand (lo : nat := std_range.1) (hi : nat := std_range.2) : io nat :=
monad_io_random.rand lo hi
end io
meta constant format.print_using : format → options → io unit
meta definition format.print (fmt : format) : io unit :=
format.print_using fmt options.mk
meta definition pp_using {α : Type} [has_to_format α] (a : α) (o : options) : io unit :=
format.print_using (to_fmt a) o
meta definition pp {α : Type} [has_to_format α] (a : α) : io unit :=
format.print (to_fmt a)
/-- Run the external process specified by `args`.
The process will run to completion with its output captured by a pipe, and
read into `string` which is then returned. -/
def io.cmd (args : io.process.spawn_args) : io string :=
do child ← io.proc.spawn { stdout := io.process.stdio.piped, ..args },
buf ← io.fs.read_to_end child.stdout,
io.fs.close child.stdout,
exitv ← io.proc.wait child,
when (exitv ≠ 0) $ io.fail $ "process exited with status " ++ repr exitv,
return buf.to_string
/--
This is the "back door" into the `io` monad, allowing IO computation to be performed during tactic execution.
For this to be safe, the IO computation should be ideally free of side effects and independent of its environment.
This primitive is used to invoke external tools (e.g., SAT and SMT solvers) from a tactic.
IMPORTANT: this primitive can be used to implement `unsafe_perform_io {α : Type} : io α → option α`
or `unsafe_perform_io {α : Type} [inhabited α] : io α → α`. This can be accomplished by executing
the resulting tactic using an empty `tactic_state` (we have `tactic_state.mk_empty`).
If `unsafe_perform_io` is defined, and used to perform side-effects, users need to take the following
precautions:
- Use `@[noinline]` attribute in any function to invokes `tactic.unsafe_perform_io`.
Reason: if the call is inlined, the IO may be performed more than once.
- Set `set_option compiler.cse false` before any function that invokes `tactic.unsafe_perform_io`.
This option disables common subexpression elimination. Common subexpression elimination
might combine two side effects that were meant to be separate.
TODO[Leo]: add `[noinline]` attribute and option `compiler.cse`.
-/
meta constant tactic.unsafe_run_io {α : Type} : io α → tactic α
/--
Execute the given tactic with a tactic_state object that contains:
- The current environment in the virtual machine.
- The current set of options in the virtual machine.
- Empty metavariable and local contexts.
- One single goal of the form `⊢ true`.
This action is mainly useful for writing tactics that inspect
the environment. -/
meta constant io.run_tactic {α : Type} (a : tactic α) : io α
|
5a9b768693ac897b8bc505b6f69a26b928442418 | 947b78d97130d56365ae2ec264df196ce769371a | /stage0/src/Init/Control.lean | d2aa8404f894f7ccd13744f40275a4481fc962b8 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | shyamalschandra/lean4 | 27044812be8698f0c79147615b1d5090b9f4b037 | 6e7a883b21eaf62831e8111b251dc9b18f40e604 | refs/heads/master | 1,671,417,126,371 | 1,601,859,995,000 | 1,601,860,020,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 606 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Control.Applicative
import Init.Control.Functor
import Init.Control.Alternative
import Init.Control.Monad
import Init.Control.MonadLift
import Init.Control.MonadFunctor
import Init.Control.MonadRun
import Init.Control.MonadControl
import Init.Control.State
import Init.Control.StateRef
import Init.Control.Id
import Init.Control.Except
import Init.Control.Reader
import Init.Control.Option
import Init.Control.Conditional
|
cb4d1cf88e3c8c152b540d4071d9b479edac60b8 | 9be442d9ec2fcf442516ed6e9e1660aa9071b7bd | /src/Lean/Elab/Deriving/Hashable.lean | b1b57872973fa7b3a3122eaa3d89101ff994b461 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | EdAyers/lean4 | 57ac632d6b0789cb91fab2170e8c9e40441221bd | 37ba0df5841bde51dbc2329da81ac23d4f6a4de4 | refs/heads/master | 1,676,463,245,298 | 1,660,619,433,000 | 1,660,619,433,000 | 183,433,437 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,657,612,672,000 | 1,556,196,574,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,592 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Dany Fabian
-/
import Lean.Meta.Inductive
import Lean.Elab.Deriving.Basic
import Lean.Elab.Deriving.Util
namespace Lean.Elab.Deriving.Hashable
open Command
open Lean.Parser.Term
open Meta
def mkHashableHeader (indVal : InductiveVal) : TermElabM Header := do
mkHeader `Hashable 1 indVal
def mkMatch (ctx : Context) (header : Header) (indVal : InductiveVal) : TermElabM Term := do
let discrs ← mkDiscrs header indVal
let alts ← mkAlts
`(match $[$discrs],* with $alts:matchAlt*)
where
mkAlts : TermElabM (Array (TSyntax ``matchAlt)) := do
let mut alts := #[]
let mut ctorIdx := 0
let allIndVals := indVal.all.toArray
for ctorName in indVal.ctors do
let ctorInfo ← getConstInfoCtor ctorName
let alt ← forallTelescopeReducing ctorInfo.type fun xs _ => do
let mut patterns := #[]
-- add `_` pattern for indices
for _ in [:indVal.numIndices] do
patterns := patterns.push (← `(_))
let mut ctorArgs := #[]
let mut rhs ← `($(quote ctorIdx))
-- add `_` for inductive parameters, they are inaccessible
for _ in [:indVal.numParams] do
ctorArgs := ctorArgs.push (← `(_))
for i in [:ctorInfo.numFields] do
let x := xs[indVal.numParams + i]!
let a := mkIdent (← mkFreshUserName `a)
ctorArgs := ctorArgs.push a
let xTy ← whnf (← inferType x)
match xTy.getAppFn with
| .const declName .. =>
match allIndVals.findIdx? (· == declName) with
| some x => rhs ← `(mixHash $rhs ($(mkIdent ctx.auxFunNames[x]!) $a:ident))
| none => rhs ← `(mixHash $rhs (hash $a:ident))
| _ => rhs ← `(mixHash $rhs (hash $a:ident))
patterns := patterns.push (← `(@$(mkIdent ctorName):ident $ctorArgs:term*))
`(matchAltExpr| | $[$patterns:term],* => $rhs:term)
alts := alts.push alt
ctorIdx := ctorIdx + 1
return alts
def mkAuxFunction (ctx : Context) (i : Nat) : TermElabM Command := do
let auxFunName := ctx.auxFunNames[i]!
let indVal := ctx.typeInfos[i]!
let header ← mkHashableHeader indVal
let body ← mkMatch ctx header indVal
let binders := header.binders
if ctx.usePartial then
-- TODO(Dany): Get rid of this code branch altogether once we have well-founded recursion
`(private partial def $(mkIdent auxFunName):ident $binders:bracketedBinder* : UInt64 := $body:term)
else
`(private def $(mkIdent auxFunName):ident $binders:bracketedBinder* : UInt64 := $body:term)
def mkHashFuncs (ctx : Context) : TermElabM Syntax := do
let mut auxDefs := #[]
for i in [:ctx.typeInfos.size] do
auxDefs := auxDefs.push (← mkAuxFunction ctx i)
`(mutual $auxDefs:command* end)
private def mkHashableInstanceCmds (declNames : Array Name) : TermElabM (Array Syntax) := do
let ctx ← mkContext "hash" declNames[0]!
let cmds := #[← mkHashFuncs ctx] ++ (← mkInstanceCmds ctx `Hashable declNames)
trace[Elab.Deriving.hashable] "\n{cmds}"
return cmds
def mkHashableHandler (declNames : Array Name) : CommandElabM Bool := do
if (← declNames.allM isInductive) && declNames.size > 0 then
let cmds ← liftTermElabM <| mkHashableInstanceCmds declNames
cmds.forM elabCommand
return true
else
return false
builtin_initialize
registerDerivingHandler ``Hashable mkHashableHandler
registerTraceClass `Elab.Deriving.hashable
|
b71b85f4cbb35651d02253481e0f5fa1119f5ed8 | 4b846d8dabdc64e7ea03552bad8f7fa74763fc67 | /library/init/meta/async_tactic.lean | e4bde39410996f4f3d848a299bd0990794b034a2 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | pacchiano/lean | 9324b33f3ac3b5c5647285160f9f6ea8d0d767dc | fdadada3a970377a6df8afcd629a6f2eab6e84e8 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,357,380,399 | 1,489,870,101,000 | 1,489,870,101,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,851 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Gabriel Ebner. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Gabriel Ebner
-/
prelude
import init.meta.tactic
import init.meta.interactive
namespace tactic
private meta def report {α} (s : tactic_state) : option (unit → format) → α
| (some fmt) := undefined_core $ to_string $ fmt () ++ format.line ++ to_fmt s
| none := undefined_core "silent failure"
private meta def run_or_fail {α} (s : tactic_state) (tac : tactic α) : α :=
match tac s with
| (result.success a s) := a
| (result.exception fmt _ s') := report s' fmt
end
meta def run_async {α : Type} (tac : tactic α) : tactic (task α) := do
s ← read, return $ task.delay $ λ _,
match tac s with
| (result.success a s) := a
| (result.exception fmt _ s') := report s' fmt
end
meta def prove_goal_async (tac : tactic unit) : tactic unit := do
ctx ← local_context, revert_lst ctx,
tgt ← target, tgt ← instantiate_mvars tgt,
env ← get_env, tgt ← return $ env^.unfold_untrusted_macros tgt,
when tgt^.has_meta_var (fail "goal contains metavariables"),
params ← return tgt^.collect_univ_params,
lemma_name ← new_aux_decl_name,
proof ← run_async (do
goal_meta ← mk_meta_var tgt,
set_goals [goal_meta],
monad.for' ctx (λc, intro c^.local_pp_name),
tac,
proof ← instantiate_mvars goal_meta,
proof ← return $ env^.unfold_untrusted_macros proof,
when proof^.has_meta_var $ fail "async proof failed: contains metavariables",
return proof),
add_decl $ declaration.thm lemma_name params tgt proof,
exact (expr.const lemma_name (params^.map level.param))
namespace interactive
open interactive.types
/-- Proves the first goal asynchronously as a separate lemma. -/
meta def async (tac : irtactic) : tactic unit :=
prove_goal_async tac
end interactive
end tactic
|
44d725b7b9bff12581797345eaa3e78e212194d9 | 82e44445c70db0f03e30d7be725775f122d72f3e | /src/algebra/support.lean | d30faeb371face200960dff3708f66f27eae3aec | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | stjordanis/mathlib | 51e286d19140e3788ef2c470bc7b953e4991f0c9 | 2568d41bca08f5d6bf39d915434c8447e21f42ee | refs/heads/master | 1,631,748,053,501 | 1,627,938,886,000 | 1,627,938,886,000 | 228,728,358 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,576,630,588,000 | 1,576,630,587,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,866 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import order.conditionally_complete_lattice
import algebra.big_operators.basic
import algebra.group.prod
import algebra.group.pi
import algebra.module.pi
/-!
# Support of a function
In this file we define `function.support f = {x | f x ≠ 0}` and prove its basic properties.
We also define `function.mul_support f = {x | f x ≠ 1}`.
-/
open set
open_locale big_operators
namespace function
variables {α β A B M N P R S G M₀ G₀ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
section has_one
variables [has_one M] [has_one N] [has_one P]
/-- `support` of a function is the set of points `x` such that `f x ≠ 0`. -/
def support [has_zero A] (f : α → A) : set α := {x | f x ≠ 0}
/-- `mul_support` of a function is the set of points `x` such that `f x ≠ 1`. -/
@[to_additive] def mul_support (f : α → M) : set α := {x | f x ≠ 1}
@[to_additive] lemma nmem_mul_support {f : α → M} {x : α} :
x ∉ mul_support f ↔ f x = 1 :=
not_not
@[to_additive] lemma compl_mul_support {f : α → M} :
(mul_support f)ᶜ = {x | f x = 1} :=
ext $ λ x, nmem_mul_support
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mem_mul_support {f : α → M} {x : α} :
x ∈ mul_support f ↔ f x ≠ 1 :=
iff.rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mul_support_subset_iff {f : α → M} {s : set α} :
mul_support f ⊆ s ↔ ∀ x, f x ≠ 1 → x ∈ s :=
iff.rfl
@[to_additive] lemma mul_support_subset_iff' {f : α → M} {s : set α} :
mul_support f ⊆ s ↔ ∀ x ∉ s, f x = 1 :=
forall_congr $ λ x, not_imp_comm
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mul_support_eq_empty_iff {f : α → M} :
mul_support f = ∅ ↔ f = 1 :=
by { simp_rw [← subset_empty_iff, mul_support_subset_iff', funext_iff], simp }
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mul_support_one' : mul_support (1 : α → M) = ∅ :=
mul_support_eq_empty_iff.2 rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mul_support_one : mul_support (λ x : α, (1 : M)) = ∅ :=
mul_support_one'
@[to_additive] lemma mul_support_const {c : M} (hc : c ≠ 1) :
mul_support (λ x : α, c) = set.univ :=
by { ext x, simp [hc] }
@[to_additive] lemma mul_support_binop_subset (op : M → N → P) (op1 : op 1 1 = 1)
(f : α → M) (g : α → N) :
mul_support (λ x, op (f x) (g x)) ⊆ mul_support f ∪ mul_support g :=
λ x hx, classical.by_cases
(λ hf : f x = 1, or.inr $ λ hg, hx $ by simp only [hf, hg, op1])
or.inl
@[to_additive] lemma mul_support_sup [semilattice_sup M] (f g : α → M) :
mul_support (λ x, f x ⊔ g x) ⊆ mul_support f ∪ mul_support g :=
mul_support_binop_subset (⊔) sup_idem f g
@[to_additive] lemma mul_support_inf [semilattice_inf M] (f g : α → M) :
mul_support (λ x, f x ⊓ g x) ⊆ mul_support f ∪ mul_support g :=
mul_support_binop_subset (⊓) inf_idem f g
@[to_additive] lemma mul_support_max [linear_order M] (f g : α → M) :
mul_support (λ x, max (f x) (g x)) ⊆ mul_support f ∪ mul_support g :=
mul_support_sup f g
@[to_additive] lemma mul_support_min [linear_order M] (f g : α → M) :
mul_support (λ x, min (f x) (g x)) ⊆ mul_support f ∪ mul_support g :=
mul_support_inf f g
@[to_additive] lemma mul_support_supr [conditionally_complete_lattice M] [nonempty ι]
(f : ι → α → M) :
mul_support (λ x, ⨆ i, f i x) ⊆ ⋃ i, mul_support (f i) :=
begin
rw mul_support_subset_iff',
simp only [mem_Union, not_exists, nmem_mul_support],
intros x hx,
simp only [hx, csupr_const]
end
@[to_additive] lemma mul_support_infi [conditionally_complete_lattice M] [nonempty ι]
(f : ι → α → M) :
mul_support (λ x, ⨅ i, f i x) ⊆ ⋃ i, mul_support (f i) :=
@mul_support_supr _ (order_dual M) ι ⟨(1:M)⟩ _ _ f
@[to_additive] lemma mul_support_comp_subset {g : M → N} (hg : g 1 = 1) (f : α → M) :
mul_support (g ∘ f) ⊆ mul_support f :=
λ x, mt $ λ h, by simp only [(∘), *]
@[to_additive] lemma mul_support_subset_comp {g : M → N} (hg : ∀ {x}, g x = 1 → x = 1)
(f : α → M) :
mul_support f ⊆ mul_support (g ∘ f) :=
λ x, mt hg
@[to_additive] lemma mul_support_comp_eq (g : M → N) (hg : ∀ {x}, g x = 1 ↔ x = 1)
(f : α → M) :
mul_support (g ∘ f) = mul_support f :=
set.ext $ λ x, not_congr hg
@[to_additive] lemma mul_support_comp_eq_preimage (g : β → M) (f : α → β) :
mul_support (g ∘ f) = f ⁻¹' mul_support g :=
rfl
@[to_additive support_prod_mk] lemma mul_support_prod_mk (f : α → M) (g : α → N) :
mul_support (λ x, (f x, g x)) = mul_support f ∪ mul_support g :=
set.ext $ λ x, by simp only [mul_support, not_and_distrib, mem_union_eq, mem_set_of_eq,
prod.mk_eq_one, ne.def]
@[to_additive support_prod_mk'] lemma mul_support_prod_mk' (f : α → M × N) :
mul_support f = mul_support (λ x, (f x).1) ∪ mul_support (λ x, (f x).2) :=
by simp only [← mul_support_prod_mk, prod.mk.eta]
@[to_additive] lemma mul_support_along_fiber_subset (f : α × β → M) (a : α) :
mul_support (λ b, f (a, b)) ⊆ (mul_support f).image prod.snd :=
by tidy
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mul_support_along_fiber_finite_of_finite
(f : α × β → M) (a : α) (h : (mul_support f).finite) :
(mul_support (λ b, f (a, b))).finite :=
(h.image prod.snd).subset (mul_support_along_fiber_subset f a)
end has_one
@[to_additive] lemma mul_support_mul [monoid M] (f g : α → M) :
mul_support (λ x, f x * g x) ⊆ mul_support f ∪ mul_support g :=
mul_support_binop_subset (*) (one_mul _) f g
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mul_support_inv [group G] (f : α → G) :
mul_support (λ x, (f x)⁻¹) = mul_support f :=
set.ext $ λ x, not_congr inv_eq_one
@[simp, to_additive support_neg'] lemma mul_support_inv'' [group G] (f : α → G) :
mul_support (f⁻¹) = mul_support f :=
mul_support_inv f
@[simp] lemma mul_support_inv' [group_with_zero G₀] (f : α → G₀) :
mul_support (λ x, (f x)⁻¹) = mul_support f :=
set.ext $ λ x, not_congr inv_eq_one'
@[to_additive] lemma mul_support_mul_inv [group G] (f g : α → G) :
mul_support (λ x, f x * (g x)⁻¹) ⊆ mul_support f ∪ mul_support g :=
mul_support_binop_subset (λ a b, a * b⁻¹) (by simp) f g
@[to_additive support_sub] lemma mul_support_group_div [group G] (f g : α → G) :
mul_support (λ x, f x / g x) ⊆ mul_support f ∪ mul_support g :=
mul_support_binop_subset (/) (by simp only [one_div, one_inv]) f g
lemma mul_support_div [group_with_zero G₀] (f g : α → G₀) :
mul_support (λ x, f x / g x) ⊆ mul_support f ∪ mul_support g :=
mul_support_binop_subset (/) (by simp only [div_one]) f g
@[simp] lemma support_mul [mul_zero_class R] [no_zero_divisors R] (f g : α → R) :
support (λ x, f x * g x) = support f ∩ support g :=
set.ext $ λ x, by simp only [mem_support, mul_ne_zero_iff, mem_inter_eq, not_or_distrib]
lemma support_smul_subset_right [add_monoid A] [monoid B] [distrib_mul_action B A]
(b : B) (f : α → A) :
support (b • f) ⊆ support f :=
λ x hbf hf, hbf $ by rw [pi.smul_apply, hf, smul_zero]
lemma support_smul_subset_left [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M]
(f : α → R) (g : α → M) :
support (f • g) ⊆ support f :=
λ x hfg hf, hfg $ by rw [pi.smul_apply', hf, zero_smul]
lemma support_smul [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M]
[no_zero_smul_divisors R M] (f : α → R) (g : α → M) :
support (f • g) = support f ∩ support g :=
ext $ λ x, smul_ne_zero
@[simp] lemma support_inv [group_with_zero G₀] (f : α → G₀) :
support (λ x, (f x)⁻¹) = support f :=
set.ext $ λ x, not_congr inv_eq_zero
@[simp] lemma support_div [group_with_zero G₀] (f g : α → G₀) :
support (λ x, f x / g x) = support f ∩ support g :=
by simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive] lemma mul_support_prod [comm_monoid M] (s : finset α) (f : α → β → M) :
mul_support (λ x, ∏ i in s, f i x) ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ s, mul_support (f i) :=
begin
rw mul_support_subset_iff',
simp only [mem_Union, not_exists, nmem_mul_support],
exact λ x, finset.prod_eq_one
end
lemma support_prod_subset [comm_monoid_with_zero A] (s : finset α) (f : α → β → A) :
support (λ x, ∏ i in s, f i x) ⊆ ⋂ i ∈ s, support (f i) :=
λ x hx, mem_bInter_iff.2 $ λ i hi H, hx $ finset.prod_eq_zero hi H
lemma support_prod [comm_monoid_with_zero A] [no_zero_divisors A] [nontrivial A]
(s : finset α) (f : α → β → A) :
support (λ x, ∏ i in s, f i x) = ⋂ i ∈ s, support (f i) :=
set.ext $ λ x, by
simp only [support, ne.def, finset.prod_eq_zero_iff, mem_set_of_eq, set.mem_Inter, not_exists]
lemma mul_support_one_add [has_one R] [add_left_cancel_monoid R] (f : α → R) :
mul_support (λ x, 1 + f x) = support f :=
set.ext $ λ x, not_congr add_right_eq_self
lemma mul_support_one_add' [has_one R] [add_left_cancel_monoid R] (f : α → R) :
mul_support (1 + f) = support f :=
mul_support_one_add f
lemma mul_support_add_one [has_one R] [add_right_cancel_monoid R] (f : α → R) :
mul_support (λ x, f x + 1) = support f :=
set.ext $ λ x, not_congr add_left_eq_self
lemma mul_support_add_one' [has_one R] [add_right_cancel_monoid R] (f : α → R) :
mul_support (f + 1) = support f :=
mul_support_add_one f
lemma mul_support_one_sub' [has_one R] [add_group R] (f : α → R) :
mul_support (1 - f) = support f :=
by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, mul_support_one_add', support_neg']
lemma mul_support_one_sub [has_one R] [add_group R] (f : α → R) :
mul_support (λ x, 1 - f x) = support f :=
mul_support_one_sub' f
end function
namespace set
open function
variables {α β M : Type*} [has_one M] {f : α → M}
@[to_additive] lemma image_inter_mul_support_eq {s : set β} {g : β → α} :
(g '' s ∩ mul_support f) = g '' (s ∩ mul_support (f ∘ g)) :=
by rw [mul_support_comp_eq_preimage f g, image_inter_preimage]
end set
namespace pi
variables {A : Type*} {B : Type*} [decidable_eq A] [has_zero B] {a : A} {b : B}
lemma support_single_zero : function.support (pi.single a (0 : B)) = ∅ := by simp
@[simp] lemma support_single_of_ne (h : b ≠ 0) :
function.support (pi.single a b) = {a} :=
begin
ext,
simp only [mem_singleton_iff, ne.def, function.mem_support],
split,
{ contrapose!,
exact λ h', single_eq_of_ne h' b },
{ rintro rfl,
rw single_eq_same,
exact h }
end
lemma support_single [decidable_eq B] :
function.support (pi.single a b) = if b = 0 then ∅ else {a} := by { split_ifs with h; simp [h] }
lemma support_single_subset : function.support (pi.single a b) ⊆ {a} :=
begin
classical,
rw support_single,
split_ifs; simp
end
lemma support_single_disjoint {b' : B} (hb : b ≠ 0) (hb' : b' ≠ 0) {i j : A} :
disjoint (function.support (single i b)) (function.support (single j b')) ↔ i ≠ j :=
by simpa [support_single, hb, hb'] using ne_comm
end pi
|
6e3440b7746c9b0e9e930a4639e0d83f74f9d2b3 | a047a4718edfa935d17231e9e6ecec8c7b701e05 | /src/linear_algebra/affine_space.lean | 7d9b73c94ddd32b034bba9b188f3fd8f46196dc3 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | utensil-contrib/mathlib | bae0c9fafe5e2bdb516efc89d6f8c1502ecc9767 | b91909e77e219098a2f8cc031f89d595fe274bd2 | refs/heads/master | 1,668,048,976,965 | 1,592,442,701,000 | 1,592,442,701,000 | 273,197,855 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,592,472,812,000 | 1,592,472,811,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 29,968 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Joseph Myers.
-/
import algebra.add_torsor
import linear_algebra.basis
noncomputable theory
open_locale big_operators
/-!
# Affine spaces
This file defines affine spaces (over modules) and subspaces, affine
maps, affine combinations of points, and the affine span of a set of
points.
## Implementation notes
This file is very minimal and many things are surely omitted. Most
results can be deduced from corresponding results for modules or
vector spaces. The variables `k` and `V` are explicit rather than
implicit arguments to lemmas because otherwise the elaborator
sometimes has problems inferring appropriate types and type class
instances. Definitions of affine spaces vary as to whether a space
with no points is permitted; here, we require a nonempty type of
points (via the definition of torsors requiring a nonempty type).
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affine_space
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principal_homogeneous_space
-/
/-- `affine_space` is an abbreviation for `add_torsor` in the case
where the group is a vector space, or more generally a module, but we
omit the type classes `[ring k]` and `[module k V]` in the type
synonym itself to simplify type class search.. -/
@[nolint unused_arguments]
abbreviation affine_space (k : Type*) (V : Type*) (P : Type*) [add_comm_group V] :=
add_torsor V P
namespace affine_space
open add_action
open add_torsor
variables (k : Type*) (V : Type*) {P : Type*} [ring k] [add_comm_group V] [module k V]
variables [S : affine_space k V P]
include S
/-- The submodule spanning the differences of a (possibly empty) set
of points. -/
def vector_span (s : set P) : submodule k V := submodule.span k (vsub_set V s)
/-- The points in the affine span of a (possibly empty) set of
points. Use `affine_span` instead to get an `affine_subspace k V P`,
if the set of points is known to be nonempty. -/
def span_points (s : set P) : set P :=
{p | ∃ p1 ∈ s, ∃ v ∈ (vector_span k V s), p = v +ᵥ p1}
/-- A point in a set is in its affine span. -/
lemma mem_span_points (p : P) (s : set P) : p ∈ s → p ∈ span_points k V s
| hp := ⟨p, hp, 0, submodule.zero_mem _, (zero_vadd V p).symm⟩
/-- The set of points in the affine span of a nonempty set of points
is nonempty. -/
lemma span_points_nonempty_of_nonempty {s : set P} :
s.nonempty → (span_points k V s).nonempty
| ⟨p, hp⟩ := ⟨p, mem_span_points k V p s hp⟩
/-- Adding a point in the affine span and a vector in the spanning
submodule produces a point in the affine span. -/
lemma vadd_mem_span_points_of_mem_span_points_of_mem_vector_span {s : set P} {p : P} {v : V}
(hp : p ∈ span_points k V s) (hv : v ∈ vector_span k V s) : v +ᵥ p ∈ span_points k V s :=
begin
rcases hp with ⟨p2, ⟨hp2, ⟨v2, ⟨hv2, hv2p⟩⟩⟩⟩,
rw [hv2p, vadd_assoc],
use [p2, hp2, v + v2, (vector_span k V s).add_mem hv hv2, rfl]
end
/-- Subtracting two points in the affine span produces a vector in the
spanning submodule. -/
lemma vsub_mem_vector_span_of_mem_span_points_of_mem_span_points {s : set P} {p1 p2 : P}
(hp1 : p1 ∈ span_points k V s) (hp2 : p2 ∈ span_points k V s) :
p1 -ᵥ p2 ∈ vector_span k V s :=
begin
rcases hp1 with ⟨p1a, ⟨hp1a, ⟨v1, ⟨hv1, hv1p⟩⟩⟩⟩,
rcases hp2 with ⟨p2a, ⟨hp2a, ⟨v2, ⟨hv2, hv2p⟩⟩⟩⟩,
rw [hv1p, hv2p, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub V (v1 +ᵥ p1a), vadd_vsub_assoc, add_comm, add_sub_assoc],
have hv1v2 : v1 - v2 ∈ vector_span k V s,
{ apply (vector_span k V s).add_mem hv1,
rw ←neg_one_smul k v2,
exact (vector_span k V s).smul_mem (-1 : k) hv2 },
refine (vector_span k V s).add_mem _ hv1v2,
unfold vector_span,
change p1a -ᵥ p2a ∈ submodule.span k (vsub_set V s),
have hp1p2 : p1a -ᵥ p2a ∈ vsub_set V s, { use [p1a, hp1a, p2a, hp2a] },
have hp1p2s : vsub_set V s ⊆ submodule.span k (vsub_set V s) := submodule.subset_span,
apply set.mem_of_mem_of_subset hp1p2 hp1p2s
end
section combination
variables {k} {ι : Type*} [fintype ι]
/-- A weighted sum of the results of subtracting a base point from the
given points. The main cases of interest are where the sum of the
weights is 0, in which case the sum is independent of the choice of
base point, and where the sum of the weights is 1, in which case the
sum added to the base point is independent of the choice of base
point. -/
def weighted_vsub_of_point (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) : V := ∑ i, w i • (p i -ᵥ b)
/-- `weighted_vsub_of_point` as a linear map on the weights. -/
def weighted_vsub_of_point_linear (p : ι → P) (b : P) : (ι → k) →ₗ[k] V :=
∑ i, (linear_map.proj i : (ι → k) →ₗ[k] k).smul_right (p i -ᵥ b)
@[simp] lemma weighted_vsub_of_point_linear_apply (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) :
weighted_vsub_of_point_linear V p b w = weighted_vsub_of_point V w p b :=
by simp [weighted_vsub_of_point_linear, linear_map.sum_apply, weighted_vsub_of_point]
/-- The weighted sum when the weights are 0. -/
@[simp] lemma weighted_vsub_of_point_zero (p : ι → P) (b : P) :
weighted_vsub_of_point V (0 : ι → k) p b = 0 :=
by rw [← weighted_vsub_of_point_linear_apply, linear_map.map_zero]
/-- The weighted sum, multiplied by a constant. -/
lemma weighted_vsub_of_point_smul (r : k) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) :
r • weighted_vsub_of_point V w p b = weighted_vsub_of_point V (r • w) p b :=
by simp only [← weighted_vsub_of_point_linear_apply, linear_map.map_smul]
/-- The weighted sum, negated. -/
lemma weighted_vsub_of_point_neg (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) :
-weighted_vsub_of_point V w p b = weighted_vsub_of_point V (-w) p b :=
by simp only [← weighted_vsub_of_point_linear_apply, linear_map.map_neg]
/-- Adding two weighted sums. -/
lemma weighted_vsub_of_point_add (w₁ w₂ : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) :
weighted_vsub_of_point V w₁ p b + weighted_vsub_of_point V w₂ p b =
weighted_vsub_of_point V (w₁ + w₂) p b :=
by simp only [← weighted_vsub_of_point_linear_apply, linear_map.map_add]
/-- Subtracting two weighted sums. -/
lemma weighted_vsub_of_point_sub (w₁ w₂ : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) :
weighted_vsub_of_point V w₁ p b - weighted_vsub_of_point V w₂ p b =
weighted_vsub_of_point V (w₁ - w₂) p b :=
by simp only [← weighted_vsub_of_point_linear_apply, linear_map.map_sub]
/-- The weighted sum is independent of the base point when the sum of
the weights is 0. -/
lemma weighted_vsub_of_point_eq_of_sum_eq_zero (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (h : ∑ i, w i = 0)
(b₁ b₂ : P) : weighted_vsub_of_point V w p b₁ = weighted_vsub_of_point V w p b₂ :=
begin
apply eq_of_sub_eq_zero,
erw ←finset.sum_sub_distrib,
conv_lhs {
congr,
skip,
funext,
rw [←smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left]
},
rw [←finset.sum_smul, h, zero_smul]
end
/-- The weighted sum, added to the base point, is independent of the
base point when the sum of the weights is 1. -/
lemma weighted_vsub_of_point_vadd_eq_of_sum_eq_one (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (h : ∑ i, w i = 1)
(b₁ b₂ : P) : weighted_vsub_of_point V w p b₁ +ᵥ b₁ = weighted_vsub_of_point V w p b₂ +ᵥ b₂ :=
begin
erw [←vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V, vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, ←add_sub_assoc, add_comm,
add_sub_assoc, ←finset.sum_sub_distrib],
conv_lhs {
congr,
skip,
congr,
skip,
funext,
rw [←smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left]
},
rw [←finset.sum_smul, h, one_smul, vsub_add_vsub_cancel, vsub_self]
end
/-- A weighted sum of the results of subtracting a default base point
from the given points. This is intended to be used when the sum of
the weights is 0; that condition is specified as a hypothesis on those
lemmas that require it. -/
def weighted_vsub (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) : V :=
weighted_vsub_of_point V w p (classical.choice S.nonempty)
/-- `weighted_vsub` gives the sum of the results of subtracting any
base point, when the sum of the weights is 0. -/
lemma weighted_vsub_eq_weighted_vsub_of_point_of_sum_eq_zero (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P)
(h : ∑ i, w i = 0) (b : P) : weighted_vsub V w p = weighted_vsub_of_point V w p b :=
weighted_vsub_of_point_eq_of_sum_eq_zero V w p h _ _
/-- The weighted sum when the weights are 0. -/
@[simp] lemma weighted_vsub_zero (p : ι → P) : weighted_vsub V (0 : ι → k) p = 0 :=
weighted_vsub_of_point_zero V p _
/-- The weighted sum, multiplied by a constant. -/
lemma weighted_vsub_smul (r : k) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
r • weighted_vsub V w p = weighted_vsub V (r • w) p :=
weighted_vsub_of_point_smul V r w p _
/-- The weighted sum, negated. -/
lemma weighted_vsub_neg (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
-weighted_vsub V w p = weighted_vsub V (-w) p :=
weighted_vsub_of_point_neg V w p _
/-- Adding two weighted sums. -/
lemma weighted_vsub_add (w₁ w₂ : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
weighted_vsub V w₁ p + weighted_vsub V w₂ p = weighted_vsub V (w₁ + w₂) p :=
weighted_vsub_of_point_add V w₁ w₂ p _
/-- Subtracting two weighted sums. -/
lemma weighted_vsub_sub (w₁ w₂ : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
weighted_vsub V w₁ p - weighted_vsub V w₂ p = weighted_vsub V (w₁ - w₂) p :=
weighted_vsub_of_point_sub V w₁ w₂ p _
/-- A weighted sum of the results of subtracting a default base point
from the given points, added to that base point. This is intended to
be used when the sum of the weights is 1, in which case it is an
affine combination (barycenter) of the points with the given weights;
that condition is specified as a hypothesis on those lemmas that
require it. -/
def affine_combination (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) : P :=
weighted_vsub_of_point V w p (classical.choice S.nonempty) +ᵥ (classical.choice S.nonempty)
/-- `affine_combination` gives the sum with any base point, when the
sum of the weights is 1. -/
lemma affine_combination_eq_weighted_vsub_of_point_vadd_of_sum_eq_one (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P)
(h : ∑ i, w i = 1) (b : P) : affine_combination V w p = weighted_vsub_of_point V w p b +ᵥ b :=
weighted_vsub_of_point_vadd_eq_of_sum_eq_one V w p h _ _
/-- Adding a `weighted_vsub` to an `affine_combination`. -/
lemma weighted_vsub_vadd_affine_combination (w₁ w₂ : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
weighted_vsub V w₁ p +ᵥ affine_combination V w₂ p = affine_combination V (w₁ + w₂) p :=
begin
erw vadd_assoc,
congr,
exact weighted_vsub_add V w₁ w₂ p
end
/-- Subtracting two `affine_combination`s. -/
lemma affine_combination_vsub (w₁ w₂ : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
affine_combination V w₁ p -ᵥ affine_combination V w₂ p = weighted_vsub V (w₁ - w₂) p :=
begin
erw vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_right,
exact weighted_vsub_sub V w₁ w₂ p
end
end combination
end affine_space
open add_torsor affine_space
/-- An `affine_subspace k V P` is a subset of an `affine_space k V P`
that has an affine space structure induced by a corresponding subspace
of the `module k V`. -/
structure affine_subspace (k : Type*) (V : Type*) (P : Type*) [ring k] [add_comm_group V]
[module k V] [affine_space k V P] :=
(carrier : set P)
(direction : submodule k V)
(nonempty : carrier.nonempty)
(add : ∀ (p : P) (v : V), p ∈ carrier → v ∈ direction → v +ᵥ p ∈ carrier)
(sub : ∀ (p1 p2 : P), p1 ∈ carrier → p2 ∈ carrier → p1 -ᵥ p2 ∈ direction)
namespace affine_subspace
variables (k : Type*) (V : Type*) (P : Type*) [ring k] [add_comm_group V] [module k V]
[S : affine_space k V P]
include S
instance : has_coe (affine_subspace k V P) (set P) := ⟨carrier⟩
instance : has_mem P (affine_subspace k V P) := ⟨λ p s, p ∈ (s : set P)⟩
/-- A point is in an affine subspace coerced to a set if and only if
it is in that affine subspace. -/
@[simp] lemma mem_coe (p : P) (s : affine_subspace k V P) :
p ∈ (s : set P) ↔ p ∈ s :=
iff.rfl
/-- The whole affine space as a subspace of itself. -/
def univ : affine_subspace k V P :=
{ carrier := set.univ,
direction := submodule.span k set.univ,
nonempty := set.nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty.1 S.nonempty,
add := λ p v hp hv, set.mem_univ _,
sub := begin
intros p1 p2 hp1 hp2,
apply set.mem_bInter,
intros x hx,
rw set.mem_set_of_eq at hx,
exact set.mem_of_mem_of_subset (set.mem_univ _) hx
end }
/-- `univ`, coerced to a set, is the whole set of points. -/
@[simp] lemma univ_coe : (univ k V P : set P) = set.univ :=
rfl
/-- All points are in `univ`. -/
lemma mem_univ (p : P) : p ∈ univ k V P :=
set.mem_univ p
instance : inhabited (affine_subspace k V P) := ⟨univ k V P⟩
variables {k V P}
/-- Two affine subspaces are equal if they have the same points. -/
@[ext] lemma ext {s1 s2 : affine_subspace k V P} (h : (s1 : set P) = s2) : s1 = s2 :=
begin
cases s1,
cases s2,
change s1_carrier = s2_carrier at h,
congr,
{ exact h },
{ ext v,
split,
{ intro hv,
have hm := s1_nonempty.some_mem,
have hvp := s1_add s1_nonempty.some v hm hv,
conv_rhs at hm { rw h },
conv_rhs at hvp { rw h },
rw ←vadd_vsub V v s1_nonempty.some,
exact s2_sub _ _ hvp hm },
{ intro hv,
have hm := s2_nonempty.some_mem,
have hvp := s2_add s2_nonempty.some v hm hv,
conv_rhs at hm { rw ←h },
conv_rhs at hvp { rw ←h },
rw ←vadd_vsub V v s2_nonempty.some,
exact s1_sub _ _ hvp hm } }
end
/-- Two affine subspaces with the same direction and nonempty
intersection are equal. -/
lemma ext_of_direction_eq {s1 s2 : affine_subspace k V P} (hd : s1.direction = s2.direction)
(hn : ((s1 : set P) ∩ s2).nonempty) : s1 = s2 :=
begin
ext p,
have hq1 := set.mem_of_mem_inter_left hn.some_mem,
have hq2 := set.mem_of_mem_inter_right hn.some_mem,
split,
{ intro hp,
rw ←vsub_vadd V p hn.some,
refine s2.add _ _ hq2 _,
rw ←hd,
exact s1.sub _ _ hp hq1 },
{ intro hp,
rw ←vsub_vadd V p hn.some,
refine s1.add _ _ hq1 _,
rw hd,
exact s2.sub _ _ hp hq2 }
end
/-- Construct an affine subspace from a point and a direction. -/
def mk_of_point_of_direction (p : P) (direction : submodule k V) : affine_subspace k V P :=
{ carrier := {q | ∃ v ∈ direction, q = v +ᵥ p},
direction := direction,
nonempty := ⟨p, ⟨0, ⟨direction.zero_mem, (add_action.zero_vadd _ _).symm⟩⟩⟩,
add := λ p2 v hp2 hv, begin
rcases hp2 with ⟨v2, hv2, hp2⟩,
use [v + v2, direction.add_mem hv hv2],
rw [←add_action.vadd_assoc, hp2]
end,
sub := λ p1 p2 hp1 hp2, begin
rcases hp1 with ⟨v1, hv1, hp1⟩,
rcases hp2 with ⟨v2, hv2, hp2⟩,
rw [hp1, hp2, vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_right],
exact direction.sub_mem hv1 hv2
end }
/-- The direction of an affine space constructed from a point and a
direction. -/
@[simp] lemma direction_mk_of_point_of_direction (p : P) (direction : submodule k V) :
(mk_of_point_of_direction p direction).direction = direction :=
rfl
/-- An affine space constructed from a point and a direction contains
that point. -/
lemma mem_mk_of_point_of_direction (p : P) (direction : submodule k V) :
p ∈ mk_of_point_of_direction p direction :=
⟨0, ⟨direction.zero_mem, (add_action.zero_vadd _ _).symm⟩⟩
/-- Constructing an affine subspace from a point in a subspace and
that subspace's direction yields the original subspace. -/
@[simp] lemma mk_of_point_of_direction_eq {s : affine_subspace k V P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) :
mk_of_point_of_direction p s.direction = s :=
ext_of_direction_eq rfl ⟨p, set.mem_inter (mem_mk_of_point_of_direction _ _) hp⟩
end affine_subspace
section affine_span
variables (k : Type*) (V : Type*) (P : Type*) [ring k] [add_comm_group V] [module k V]
[affine_space k V P]
/-- The affine span of a nonempty set of points is the smallest affine
subspace containing those points. (Actually defined here in terms of
spans in modules.) -/
def affine_span (s : set P) (h : s.nonempty) : affine_subspace k V P :=
{ carrier := span_points k V s,
direction := vector_span k V s,
nonempty := span_points_nonempty_of_nonempty k V h,
add := λ p v hp hv, vadd_mem_span_points_of_mem_span_points_of_mem_vector_span k V hp hv,
sub := λ p1 p2 hp1 hp2, vsub_mem_vector_span_of_mem_span_points_of_mem_span_points k V hp1 hp2 }
/-- The affine span, converted to a set, is `span_points`. -/
@[simp] lemma affine_span_coe (s : set P) (h : s.nonempty) :
(affine_span k V P s h : set P) = span_points k V s :=
rfl
/-- A point in a set is in its affine span. -/
lemma affine_span_mem (p : P) (s : set P) (hp : p ∈ s) : p ∈ affine_span k V P s ⟨p, hp⟩ :=
mem_span_points k V p s hp
end affine_span
/-- An `affine_map k V1 P1 V2 P2` is a map from `P1` to `P2` that
induces a corresponding linear map from `V1` to `V2`. -/
structure affine_map (k : Type*) (V1 : Type*) (P1 : Type*) (V2 : Type*) (P2 : Type*)
[ring k]
[add_comm_group V1] [module k V1] [affine_space k V1 P1]
[add_comm_group V2] [module k V2] [affine_space k V2 P2] :=
(to_fun : P1 → P2)
(linear : linear_map k V1 V2)
(map_vadd' : ∀ (p : P1) (v : V1), to_fun (v +ᵥ p) = linear v +ᵥ to_fun p)
namespace affine_map
variables {k : Type*} {V1 : Type*} {P1 : Type*} {V2 : Type*} {P2 : Type*}
{V3 : Type*} {P3 : Type*} {V4 : Type*} {P4 : Type*} [ring k]
[add_comm_group V1] [module k V1] [affine_space k V1 P1]
[add_comm_group V2] [module k V2] [affine_space k V2 P2]
[add_comm_group V3] [module k V3] [affine_space k V3 P3]
[add_comm_group V4] [module k V4] [affine_space k V4 P4]
instance: has_coe_to_fun (affine_map k V1 P1 V2 P2) := ⟨_, to_fun⟩
/-- Constructing an affine map and coercing back to a function
produces the same map. -/
@[simp] lemma coe_mk (f : P1 → P2) (linear add) :
((mk f linear add : affine_map k V1 P1 V2 P2) : P1 → P2) = f := rfl
/-- `to_fun` is the same as the result of coercing to a function. -/
@[simp] lemma to_fun_eq_coe (f : affine_map k V1 P1 V2 P2) : f.to_fun = ⇑f := rfl
/-- An affine map on the result of adding a vector to a point produces
the same result as the linear map applied to that vector, added to the
affine map applied to that point. -/
@[simp] lemma map_vadd (f : affine_map k V1 P1 V2 P2) (p : P1) (v : V1) :
f (v +ᵥ p) = f.linear v +ᵥ f p := f.map_vadd' p v
/-- The linear map on the result of subtracting two points is the
result of subtracting the result of the affine map on those two
points. -/
@[simp] lemma linear_map_vsub (f : affine_map k V1 P1 V2 P2) (p1 p2 : P1) :
f.linear (p1 -ᵥ p2) = f p1 -ᵥ f p2 :=
by conv_rhs { rw [←vsub_vadd V1 p1 p2, map_vadd, vadd_vsub] }
/-- Two affine maps are equal if they coerce to the same function. -/
@[ext] lemma ext {f g : affine_map k V1 P1 V2 P2} (h : ∀ p, f p = g p) : f = g :=
begin
rcases f with ⟨f, f_linear, f_add⟩,
rcases g with ⟨g, g_linear, g_add⟩,
have : f = g := funext h,
subst g,
congr',
ext v,
cases (add_torsor.nonempty V1 : nonempty P1) with p,
apply vadd_right_cancel (f p),
erw [← f_add, ← g_add]
end
lemma ext_iff {f g : affine_map k V1 P1 V2 P2} : f = g ↔ ∀ p, f p = g p := ⟨λ h p, h ▸ rfl, ext⟩
variables (k V1 P1 V2)
/-- Constant function as an `affine_map`. -/
def const (p : P2) : affine_map k V1 P1 V2 P2 :=
{ to_fun := function.const P1 p,
linear := 0,
map_vadd' := λ p v, by simp }
@[simp] lemma coe_const (p : P2) : ⇑(const k V1 P1 V2 p) = function.const P1 p := rfl
@[simp] lemma const_linear (p : P2) : (const k V1 P1 V2 p).linear = 0 := rfl
variables {k V1 P1 V2}
instance nonempty : nonempty (affine_map k V1 P1 V2 P2) :=
⟨const k V1 P1 V2 (classical.choice $ add_torsor.nonempty V2)⟩
/-- Construct an affine map by verifying the relation between the map and its linear part at one
base point. Namely, this function takes a map `f : P₁ → P₂`, a linear map `f' : V₁ →ₗ[k] V₂`, and
a point `p` such that for any other point `p'` we have `f p' = f' (p' -ᵥ p) +ᵥ f p`. -/
def mk' (f : P1 → P2) (f' : V1 →ₗ[k] V2) (p : P1) (h : ∀ p' : P1, f p' = f' (p' -ᵥ p) +ᵥ f p) :
affine_map k V1 P1 V2 P2 :=
{ to_fun := f,
linear := f',
map_vadd' := λ p' v, by rw [h, h p', vadd_vsub_assoc, f'.map_add, add_action.vadd_assoc] }
@[simp] lemma coe_mk' (f : P1 → P2) (f' : V1 →ₗ[k] V2) (p h) : ⇑(mk' f f' p h) = f := rfl
@[simp] lemma mk'_linear (f : P1 → P2) (f' : V1 →ₗ[k] V2) (p h) : (mk' f f' p h).linear = f' := rfl
/-- The set of affine maps to a vector space is an additive commutative group. -/
instance : add_comm_group (affine_map k V1 P1 V2 V2) :=
{ zero := ⟨0, 0, λ p v, (add_action.zero_vadd _ _).symm⟩,
add := λ f g, ⟨f + g, f.linear + g.linear, λ p v, by simp [add_add_add_comm]⟩,
neg := λ f, ⟨-f, -f.linear, λ p v, by simp [add_comm]⟩,
add_assoc := λ f₁ f₂ f₃, ext $ λ p, add_assoc _ _ _,
zero_add := λ f, ext $ λ p, zero_add (f p),
add_zero := λ f, ext $ λ p, add_zero (f p),
add_comm := λ f g, ext $ λ p, add_comm (f p) (g p),
add_left_neg := λ f, ext $ λ p, add_left_neg (f p) }
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ⇑(0 : affine_map k V1 P1 V2 V2) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma zero_linear : (0 : affine_map k V1 P1 V2 V2).linear = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_add (f g : affine_map k V1 P1 V2 V2) : ⇑(f + g) = f + g := rfl
@[simp]
lemma add_linear (f g : affine_map k V1 P1 V2 V2) : (f + g).linear = f.linear + g.linear := rfl
/-- The space of affine maps from `P1` to `P2` is an affine space over the space of affine spaces
from `P1` to the vector `V2` corresponding to `P2`. -/
instance : affine_space k (affine_map k V1 P1 V2 V2) (affine_map k V1 P1 V2 P2) :=
{ vadd := λ f g, ⟨λ p, f p +ᵥ g p, f.linear + g.linear, λ p v,
by simp [add_action.vadd_assoc, add_right_comm]⟩,
zero_vadd' := λ f, ext $ λ p, add_action.zero_vadd _ (f p),
vadd_assoc' := λ f₁ f₂ f₃, ext $ λ p, add_action.vadd_assoc V2 (f₁ p) (f₂ p) (f₃ p),
vsub := λ f g, ⟨λ p, f p -ᵥ g p, f.linear - g.linear, λ p v,
by simp [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vadd_vsub_assoc, add_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub]⟩,
vsub_vadd' := λ f g, ext $ λ p, vsub_vadd V2 (f p) (g p),
vadd_vsub' := λ f g, ext $ λ p, vadd_vsub V2 (f p) (g p) }
@[simp] lemma vadd_apply (f : affine_map k V1 P1 V2 V2) (g : affine_map k V1 P1 V2 P2) (p : P1) :
(f +ᵥ g) p = f p +ᵥ g p :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma vsub_apply (f g : affine_map k V1 P1 V2 P2) (p : P1) :
(f -ᵥ g : affine_map k V1 P1 V2 V2) p = f p -ᵥ g p :=
rfl
variables (k V1 P1)
/-- Identity map as an affine map. -/
def id : affine_map k V1 P1 V1 P1 :=
{ to_fun := id,
linear := linear_map.id,
map_vadd' := λ p v, rfl }
/-- The identity affine map acts as the identity. -/
@[simp] lemma coe_id : ⇑(id k V1 P1) = _root_.id := rfl
@[simp] lemma id_linear : (id k V1 P1).linear = linear_map.id := rfl
variable {P1}
/-- The identity affine map acts as the identity. -/
lemma id_apply (p : P1) : id k V1 P1 p = p := rfl
variables {k V1 P1 V2}
instance : inhabited (affine_map k V1 P1 V1 P1) := ⟨id k V1 P1⟩
/-- Composition of affine maps. -/
def comp (f : affine_map k V2 P2 V3 P3) (g : affine_map k V1 P1 V2 P2) :
affine_map k V1 P1 V3 P3 :=
{ to_fun := f ∘ g,
linear := f.linear.comp g.linear,
map_vadd' := begin
intros p v,
rw [function.comp_app, g.map_vadd, f.map_vadd],
refl
end }
/-- Composition of affine maps acts as applying the two functions. -/
@[simp] lemma coe_comp (f : affine_map k V2 P2 V3 P3) (g : affine_map k V1 P1 V2 P2) :
⇑(f.comp g) = f ∘ g := rfl
/-- Composition of affine maps acts as applying the two functions. -/
lemma comp_apply (f : affine_map k V2 P2 V3 P3) (g : affine_map k V1 P1 V2 P2) (p : P1) :
f.comp g p = f (g p) := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_id (f : affine_map k V1 P1 V2 P2) : f.comp (id k V1 P1) = f := ext $ λ p, rfl
@[simp] lemma id_comp (f : affine_map k V1 P1 V2 P2) : (id k V2 P2).comp f = f := ext $ λ p, rfl
lemma comp_assoc (f₃₄ : affine_map k V3 P3 V4 P4) (f₂₃ : affine_map k V2 P2 V3 P3)
(f₁₂ : affine_map k V1 P1 V2 P2) :
(f₃₄.comp f₂₃).comp f₁₂ = f₃₄.comp (f₂₃.comp f₁₂) :=
rfl
instance : monoid (affine_map k V1 P1 V1 P1) :=
{ one := id k V1 P1,
mul := comp,
one_mul := id_comp,
mul_one := comp_id,
mul_assoc := comp_assoc }
@[simp] lemma coe_mul (f g : affine_map k V1 P1 V1 P1) : ⇑(f * g) = f ∘ g := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_one : ⇑(1 : affine_map k V1 P1 V1 P1) = _root_.id := rfl
/-- The affine map from `k` to `P1` sending `0` to `p` and `1` to `v +ᵥ p`. -/
def line_map (p : P1) (v : V1) : affine_map k k k V1 P1 :=
{ to_fun := λ c, c • v +ᵥ p,
linear := linear_map.id.smul_right v,
map_vadd' := λ a b, by simp [add_smul, add_action.vadd_assoc] }
lemma line_map_apply (p : P1) (v : V1) (c : k) : line_map p v c = c • v +ᵥ p := rfl
@[simp] lemma line_map_linear (p : P1) (v : V1) :
(line_map p v : affine_map k k k V1 P1).linear = linear_map.id.smul_right v :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma line_map_zero (p : P1) : line_map p (0:V1) = const k k k V1 p :=
by { ext c, simp [line_map_apply] }
@[simp] lemma line_map_apply_zero (p : P1) (v : V1) : line_map p v (0:k) = p :=
by simp [line_map_apply]
@[simp] lemma affine_apply_line_map (f : affine_map k V1 P1 V2 P2) (p : P1) (v : V1) (c : k) :
f (line_map p v c) = line_map (f p) (f.linear v) c :=
by simp [line_map_apply]
@[simp] lemma affine_comp_line_map (f : affine_map k V1 P1 V2 P2) (p : P1) (v : V1) :
f.comp (line_map p v) = line_map (f p) (f.linear v) :=
ext $ f.affine_apply_line_map p v
lemma line_map_vadd_neg (p : P1) (v : V1) :
line_map (v +ᵥ p) (-v) = (line_map p v).comp (line_map (1:k) (-1:k)) :=
by { rw [affine_comp_line_map], simp [line_map_apply] }
end affine_map
namespace affine_map
variables {k : Type*} {V1 : Type*} {P1 : Type*} {V2 : Type*} [comm_ring k]
[add_comm_group V1] [module k V1] [affine_space k V1 P1] [add_comm_group V2] [module k V2]
/-- If `k` is a commutative ring, then the set of affine maps with codomain in a `k`-module
is a `k`-module. -/
instance : module k (affine_map k V1 P1 V2 V2) :=
{ smul := λ c f, ⟨c • f, c • f.linear, λ p v, by simp [smul_add]⟩,
one_smul := λ f, ext $ λ p, one_smul _ _,
mul_smul := λ c₁ c₂ f, ext $ λ p, mul_smul _ _ _,
smul_add := λ c f g, ext $ λ p, smul_add _ _ _,
smul_zero := λ c, ext $ λ p, smul_zero _,
add_smul := λ c₁ c₂ f, ext $ λ p, add_smul _ _ _,
zero_smul := λ f, ext $ λ p, zero_smul _ _ }
@[simp] lemma coe_smul (c : k) (f : affine_map k V1 P1 V2 V2) : ⇑(c • f) = c • f := rfl
variable (V1)
/-- `homothety V c r` is the homothety about `c` with scale factor `r`. -/
def homothety (c : P1) (r : k) : affine_map k V1 P1 V1 P1 :=
r • (id k V1 P1 -ᵥ const k V1 P1 V1 c : affine_map k V1 P1 V1 V1) +ᵥ const k V1 P1 V1 c
lemma homothety_def (c : P1) (r : k) :
homothety V1 c r = r • (id k V1 P1 -ᵥ const k V1 P1 V1 c : affine_map k V1 P1 V1 V1) +ᵥ
const k V1 P1 V1 c :=
rfl
lemma homothety_apply (c : P1) (r : k) (p : P1) :
homothety V1 c r p = r • (p -ᵥ c : V1) +ᵥ c := rfl
@[simp] lemma homothety_one (c : P1) : homothety V1 c (1:k) = id k V1 P1 :=
by { ext p, simp [homothety_apply] }
lemma homothety_mul (c : P1) (r₁ r₂ : k) :
homothety V1 c (r₁ * r₂) = (homothety V1 c r₁).comp (homothety V1 c r₂) :=
by { ext p, simp [homothety_apply, mul_smul] }
@[simp] lemma homothety_zero (c : P1) : homothety V1 c (0:k) = const k V1 P1 V1 c :=
by { ext p, simp [homothety_apply] }
@[simp] lemma homothety_add (c : P1) (r₁ r₂ : k) :
homothety V1 c (r₁ + r₂) =
r₁ • (id k V1 P1 -ᵥ const k V1 P1 V1 c : affine_map k V1 P1 V1 V1) +ᵥ homothety V1 c r₂ :=
by simp only [homothety_def, add_smul, add_action.vadd_assoc]
/-- `homothety` as a multiplicative monoid homomorphism. -/
def homothety_hom (c : P1) : k →* affine_map k V1 P1 V1 P1 :=
⟨homothety V1 c, homothety_one V1 c, homothety_mul V1 c⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_homothety_hom (c : P1) : ⇑(homothety_hom V1 c : k →* _) = homothety V1 c := rfl
/-- `homothety` as an affine map. -/
def homothety_affine (c : P1) :
affine_map k k k (affine_map k V1 P1 V1 V1) (affine_map k V1 P1 V1 P1) :=
⟨homothety V1 c, (linear_map.lsmul k _).flip (id k V1 P1 -ᵥ const k V1 P1 V1 c),
function.swap (homothety_add V1 c)⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_homothety_affine (c : P1) :
⇑(homothety_affine V1 c : affine_map k k k _ _) = homothety V1 c :=
rfl
end affine_map
namespace affine_map
variables {k : Type*} (V : Type*) (P : Type*) [comm_ring k] [add_comm_group V] [module k V]
variables [affine_space k V P] {ι : Type*} [fintype ι]
-- TODO: define `affine_map.proj`, `affine_map.fst`, `affine_map.snd`
/-- A weighted sum, as an affine map on the points involved. -/
def weighted_vsub_of_point (w : ι → k) : affine_map k ((ι → V) × V) ((ι → P) × P) V V :=
{ to_fun := λ p, weighted_vsub_of_point _ w p.fst p.snd,
linear := ∑ i, w i • ((linear_map.proj i).comp (linear_map.fst _ _ _) - linear_map.snd _ _ _),
map_vadd' := begin
rintros ⟨p, b⟩ ⟨v, b'⟩,
simp [linear_map.sum_apply, weighted_vsub_of_point, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vadd_vsub_assoc,
add_sub, ← sub_add_eq_add_sub, smul_add, finset.sum_add_distrib]
end }
end affine_map
namespace linear_map
variables {k : Type*} {V₁ : Type*} {V₂ : Type*} [ring k] [add_comm_group V₁] [module k V₁]
[add_comm_group V₂] [module k V₂] (f : V₁ →ₗ[k] V₂)
/-- Reinterpret a linear map as an affine map. -/
def to_affine_map : affine_map k V₁ V₁ V₂ V₂ :=
{ to_fun := f,
linear := f,
map_vadd' := λ p v, f.map_add v p }
@[simp] lemma coe_to_affine_map : ⇑f.to_affine_map = f := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_affine_map_linear : f.to_affine_map.linear = f := rfl
end linear_map
|
963ab3c506b810b62b759dd06d97d015e736d35f | 367134ba5a65885e863bdc4507601606690974c1 | /src/analysis/complex/basic.lean | d07602c2ed40066934944667eb2fa3154c8c4920 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kodyvajjha/mathlib | 9bead00e90f68269a313f45f5561766cfd8d5cad | b98af5dd79e13a38d84438b850a2e8858ec21284 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,350,366,310 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 162,666,963 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,545,367,651,000 | 1,545,367,651,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,565 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import data.complex.module
import data.complex.is_R_or_C
/-!
# Normed space structure on `ℂ`.
This file gathers basic facts on complex numbers of an analytic nature.
## Main results
This file registers `ℂ` as a normed field, expresses basic properties of the norm, and gives
tools on the real vector space structure of `ℂ`. Notably, in the namespace `complex`,
it defines functions:
* `re_clm`
* `im_clm`
* `of_real_clm`
* `conj_clm`
They are bundled versions of the real part, the imaginary part, the embedding of `ℝ` in `ℂ`, and
the complex conjugate as continuous `ℝ`-linear maps. The last two are also bundled as linear
isometries in `of_real_li` and `conj_li`.
We also register the fact that `ℂ` is an `is_R_or_C` field.
-/
noncomputable theory
namespace complex
instance : has_norm ℂ := ⟨abs⟩
instance : normed_group ℂ :=
normed_group.of_core ℂ
{ norm_eq_zero_iff := λ z, abs_eq_zero,
triangle := abs_add,
norm_neg := abs_neg }
instance : normed_field ℂ :=
{ norm := abs,
dist_eq := λ _ _, rfl,
norm_mul' := abs_mul,
.. complex.field }
instance : nondiscrete_normed_field ℂ :=
{ non_trivial := ⟨2, by simp [norm]; norm_num⟩ }
instance {R : Type*} [normed_field R] [normed_algebra R ℝ] : normed_algebra R ℂ :=
{ norm_algebra_map_eq := λ x, (abs_of_real $ algebra_map R ℝ x).trans (norm_algebra_map_eq ℝ x),
to_algebra := complex.algebra }
@[simp] lemma norm_eq_abs (z : ℂ) : ∥z∥ = abs z := rfl
lemma dist_eq (z w : ℂ) : dist z w = abs (z - w) := rfl
@[simp] lemma norm_real (r : ℝ) : ∥(r : ℂ)∥ = ∥r∥ := abs_of_real _
@[simp] lemma norm_rat (r : ℚ) : ∥(r : ℂ)∥ = _root_.abs (r : ℝ) :=
suffices ∥((r : ℝ) : ℂ)∥ = _root_.abs r, by simpa,
by rw [norm_real, real.norm_eq_abs]
@[simp] lemma norm_nat (n : ℕ) : ∥(n : ℂ)∥ = n := abs_of_nat _
@[simp] lemma norm_int {n : ℤ} : ∥(n : ℂ)∥ = _root_.abs n :=
suffices ∥((n : ℝ) : ℂ)∥ = _root_.abs n, by simpa,
by rw [norm_real, real.norm_eq_abs]
lemma norm_int_of_nonneg {n : ℤ} (hn : 0 ≤ n) : ∥(n : ℂ)∥ = n :=
by rw [norm_int, _root_.abs_of_nonneg]; exact int.cast_nonneg.2 hn
open continuous_linear_map
/-- Continuous linear map version of the real part function, from `ℂ` to `ℝ`. -/
def re_clm : ℂ →L[ℝ] ℝ := re_lm.mk_continuous 1 (λ x, by simp [real.norm_eq_abs, abs_re_le_abs])
@[continuity] lemma continuous_re : continuous re := re_clm.continuous
@[simp] lemma re_clm_coe : (coe (re_clm) : ℂ →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ) = re_lm := rfl
@[simp] lemma re_clm_apply (z : ℂ) : (re_clm : ℂ → ℝ) z = z.re := rfl
@[simp] lemma re_clm_norm : ∥re_clm∥ = 1 :=
le_antisymm (linear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _ zero_le_one _) $
calc 1 = ∥re_clm 1∥ : by simp
... ≤ ∥re_clm∥ : unit_le_op_norm _ _ (by simp)
/-- Continuous linear map version of the real part function, from `ℂ` to `ℝ`. -/
def im_clm : ℂ →L[ℝ] ℝ := im_lm.mk_continuous 1 (λ x, by simp [real.norm_eq_abs, abs_im_le_abs])
@[continuity] lemma continuous_im : continuous im := im_clm.continuous
@[simp] lemma im_clm_coe : (coe (im_clm) : ℂ →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ) = im_lm := rfl
@[simp] lemma im_clm_apply (z : ℂ) : (im_clm : ℂ → ℝ) z = z.im := rfl
@[simp] lemma im_clm_norm : ∥im_clm∥ = 1 :=
le_antisymm (linear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _ zero_le_one _) $
calc 1 = ∥im_clm I∥ : by simp
... ≤ ∥im_clm∥ : unit_le_op_norm _ _ (by simp)
/-- The complex-conjugation function from `ℂ` to itself is an isometric linear map. -/
def conj_li : ℂ →ₗᵢ[ℝ] ℂ := ⟨conj_lm, λ x, by simp⟩
/-- Continuous linear map version of the conj function, from `ℂ` to `ℂ`. -/
def conj_clm : ℂ →L[ℝ] ℂ := conj_li.to_continuous_linear_map
lemma isometry_conj : isometry (conj : ℂ → ℂ) := conj_li.isometry
@[continuity] lemma continuous_conj : continuous conj := conj_clm.continuous
@[simp] lemma conj_clm_coe : (coe (conj_clm) : ℂ →ₗ[ℝ] ℂ) = conj_lm := rfl
@[simp] lemma conj_clm_apply (z : ℂ) : (conj_clm : ℂ → ℂ) z = z.conj := rfl
@[simp] lemma conj_clm_norm : ∥conj_clm∥ = 1 := conj_li.norm_to_continuous_linear_map
/-- Linear isometry version of the canonical embedding of `ℝ` in `ℂ`. -/
def of_real_li : ℝ →ₗᵢ[ℝ] ℂ := ⟨of_real_lm, λ x, by simp⟩
/-- Continuous linear map version of the canonical embedding of `ℝ` in `ℂ`. -/
def of_real_clm : ℝ →L[ℝ] ℂ := of_real_li.to_continuous_linear_map
lemma isometry_of_real : isometry (coe : ℝ → ℂ) := of_real_li.isometry
@[continuity] lemma continuous_of_real : continuous (coe : ℝ → ℂ) := isometry_of_real.continuous
@[simp] lemma of_real_clm_coe : (coe (of_real_clm) : ℝ →ₗ[ℝ] ℂ) = of_real_lm := rfl
@[simp] lemma of_real_clm_apply (x : ℝ) : (of_real_clm : ℝ → ℂ) x = x := rfl
@[simp] lemma of_real_clm_norm : ∥of_real_clm∥ = 1 := of_real_li.norm_to_continuous_linear_map
noncomputable instance : is_R_or_C ℂ :=
{ re := ⟨complex.re, complex.zero_re, complex.add_re⟩,
im := ⟨complex.im, complex.zero_im, complex.add_im⟩,
conj := complex.conj,
I := complex.I,
I_re_ax := by simp only [add_monoid_hom.coe_mk, complex.I_re],
I_mul_I_ax := by simp only [complex.I_mul_I, eq_self_iff_true, or_true],
re_add_im_ax := λ z, by simp only [add_monoid_hom.coe_mk, complex.re_add_im,
complex.coe_algebra_map, complex.of_real_eq_coe],
of_real_re_ax := λ r, by simp only [add_monoid_hom.coe_mk, complex.of_real_re,
complex.coe_algebra_map, complex.of_real_eq_coe],
of_real_im_ax := λ r, by simp only [add_monoid_hom.coe_mk, complex.of_real_im,
complex.coe_algebra_map, complex.of_real_eq_coe],
mul_re_ax := λ z w, by simp only [complex.mul_re, add_monoid_hom.coe_mk],
mul_im_ax := λ z w, by simp only [add_monoid_hom.coe_mk, complex.mul_im],
conj_re_ax := λ z, by simp only [ring_hom.coe_mk, add_monoid_hom.coe_mk, complex.conj_re],
conj_im_ax := λ z, by simp only [ring_hom.coe_mk, complex.conj_im, add_monoid_hom.coe_mk],
conj_I_ax := by simp only [complex.conj_I, ring_hom.coe_mk],
norm_sq_eq_def_ax := λ z, by simp only [←complex.norm_sq_eq_abs, ←complex.norm_sq_apply,
add_monoid_hom.coe_mk, complex.norm_eq_abs],
mul_im_I_ax := λ z, by simp only [mul_one, add_monoid_hom.coe_mk, complex.I_im],
inv_def_ax := λ z, by simp only [complex.inv_def, complex.norm_sq_eq_abs, complex.coe_algebra_map,
complex.of_real_eq_coe, complex.norm_eq_abs],
div_I_ax := complex.div_I }
end complex
namespace is_R_or_C
local notation `reC` := @is_R_or_C.re ℂ _
local notation `imC` := @is_R_or_C.im ℂ _
local notation `conjC` := @is_R_or_C.conj ℂ _
local notation `IC` := @is_R_or_C.I ℂ _
local notation `absC` := @is_R_or_C.abs ℂ _
local notation `norm_sqC` := @is_R_or_C.norm_sq ℂ _
@[simp] lemma re_to_complex {x : ℂ} : reC x = x.re := rfl
@[simp] lemma im_to_complex {x : ℂ} : imC x = x.im := rfl
@[simp] lemma conj_to_complex {x : ℂ} : conjC x = x.conj := rfl
@[simp] lemma I_to_complex : IC = complex.I := rfl
@[simp] lemma norm_sq_to_complex {x : ℂ} : norm_sqC x = complex.norm_sq x :=
by simp [is_R_or_C.norm_sq, complex.norm_sq]
@[simp] lemma abs_to_complex {x : ℂ} : absC x = complex.abs x :=
by simp [is_R_or_C.abs, complex.abs]
end is_R_or_C
|
c13551715516f00614c9155d61f7d4e10e5b6511 | 80cc5bf14c8ea85ff340d1d747a127dcadeb966f | /src/meta/expr.lean | 39a8489c5168ba3e6dcc09dbebd41cc759827706 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | lacker/mathlib | f2439c743c4f8eb413ec589430c82d0f73b2d539 | ddf7563ac69d42cfa4a1bfe41db1fed521bd795f | refs/heads/master | 1,671,948,326,773 | 1,601,479,268,000 | 1,601,479,268,000 | 298,686,743 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,601,070,794,000 | 1,601,070,794,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 37,507 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Simon Hudon, Scott Morrison, Keeley Hoek, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import data.string.defs
import tactic.derive_inhabited
/-!
# Additional operations on expr and related types
This file defines basic operations on the types expr, name, declaration, level, environment.
This file is mostly for non-tactics. Tactics should generally be placed in `tactic.core`.
## Tags
expr, name, declaration, level, environment, meta, metaprogramming, tactic
-/
attribute [derive has_reflect, derive decidable_eq] binder_info congr_arg_kind
@[priority 100] meta instance has_reflect.has_to_pexpr {α} [has_reflect α] : has_to_pexpr α :=
⟨λ b, pexpr.of_expr (reflect b)⟩
namespace binder_info
/-! ### Declarations about `binder_info` -/
instance : inhabited binder_info := ⟨ binder_info.default ⟩
/-- The brackets corresponding to a given binder_info. -/
def brackets : binder_info → string × string
| binder_info.implicit := ("{", "}")
| binder_info.strict_implicit := ("{{", "}}")
| binder_info.inst_implicit := ("[", "]")
| _ := ("(", ")")
end binder_info
namespace name
/-! ### Declarations about `name` -/
/-- Find the largest prefix `n` of a `name` such that `f n ≠ none`, then replace this prefix
with the value of `f n`. -/
def map_prefix (f : name → option name) : name → name
| anonymous := anonymous
| (mk_string s n') := (f (mk_string s n')).get_or_else (mk_string s $ map_prefix n')
| (mk_numeral d n') := (f (mk_numeral d n')).get_or_else (mk_numeral d $ map_prefix n')
/-- If `nm` is a simple name (having only one string component) starting with `_`, then
`deinternalize_field nm` removes the underscore. Otherwise, it does nothing. -/
meta def deinternalize_field : name → name
| (mk_string s name.anonymous) :=
let i := s.mk_iterator in
if i.curr = '_' then i.next.next_to_string else s
| n := n
/-- `get_nth_prefix nm n` removes the last `n` components from `nm` -/
meta def get_nth_prefix : name → ℕ → name
| nm 0 := nm
| nm (n + 1) := get_nth_prefix nm.get_prefix n
/-- Auxilliary definition for `pop_nth_prefix` -/
private meta def pop_nth_prefix_aux : name → ℕ → name × ℕ
| anonymous n := (anonymous, 1)
| nm n := let (pfx, height) := pop_nth_prefix_aux nm.get_prefix n in
if height ≤ n then (anonymous, height + 1)
else (nm.update_prefix pfx, height + 1)
/-- Pops the top `n` prefixes from the given name. -/
meta def pop_nth_prefix (nm : name) (n : ℕ) : name :=
prod.fst $ pop_nth_prefix_aux nm n
/-- Pop the prefix of a name -/
meta def pop_prefix (n : name) : name :=
pop_nth_prefix n 1
/-- Auxilliary definition for `from_components` -/
private def from_components_aux : name → list string → name
| n [] := n
| n (s :: rest) := from_components_aux (name.mk_string s n) rest
/-- Build a name from components. For example `from_components ["foo","bar"]` becomes
``` `foo.bar``` -/
def from_components : list string → name :=
from_components_aux name.anonymous
/-- `name`s can contain numeral pieces, which are not legal names
when typed/passed directly to the parser. We turn an arbitrary
name into a legal identifier name by turning the numbers to strings. -/
meta def sanitize_name : name → name
| name.anonymous := name.anonymous
| (name.mk_string s p) := name.mk_string s $ sanitize_name p
| (name.mk_numeral s p) := name.mk_string sformat!"n{s}" $ sanitize_name p
/-- Append a string to the last component of a name -/
def append_suffix : name → string → name
| (mk_string s n) s' := mk_string (s ++ s') n
| n _ := n
/-- The first component of a name, turning a number to a string -/
meta def head : name → string
| (mk_string s anonymous) := s
| (mk_string s p) := head p
| (mk_numeral n p) := head p
| anonymous := "[anonymous]"
/-- Tests whether the first component of a name is `"_private"` -/
meta def is_private (n : name) : bool :=
n.head = "_private"
/-- Get the last component of a name, and convert it to a string. -/
meta def last : name → string
| (mk_string s _) := s
| (mk_numeral n _) := repr n
| anonymous := "[anonymous]"
/-- Returns the number of characters used to print all the string components of a name,
including periods between name segments. Ignores numerical parts of a name. -/
meta def length : name → ℕ
| (mk_string s anonymous) := s.length
| (mk_string s p) := s.length + 1 + p.length
| (mk_numeral n p) := p.length
| anonymous := "[anonymous]".length
/-- Checks whether `nm` has a prefix (including itself) such that P is true -/
def has_prefix (P : name → bool) : name → bool
| anonymous := ff
| (mk_string s nm) := P (mk_string s nm) ∨ has_prefix nm
| (mk_numeral s nm) := P (mk_numeral s nm) ∨ has_prefix nm
/-- Appends `'` to the end of a name. -/
meta def add_prime : name → name
| (name.mk_string s p) := name.mk_string (s ++ "'") p
| n := (name.mk_string "x'" n)
/-- `last_string n` returns the rightmost component of `n`, ignoring numeral components.
For example, ``last_string `a.b.c.33`` will return `` `c ``. -/
def last_string : name → string
| anonymous := "[anonymous]"
| (mk_string s _) := s
| (mk_numeral _ n) := last_string n
/--
Constructs a (non-simple) name from a string.
Example: ``name.from_string "foo.bar" = `foo.bar``
-/
meta def from_string (s : string) : name :=
from_components $ s.split (= '.')
end name
namespace level
/-! ### Declarations about `level` -/
/-- Tests whether a universe level is non-zero for all assignments of its variables -/
meta def nonzero : level → bool
| (succ _) := tt
| (max l₁ l₂) := l₁.nonzero || l₂.nonzero
| (imax _ l₂) := l₂.nonzero
| _ := ff
/--
`l.fold_mvar f` folds a function `f : name → α → α`
over each `n : name` appearing in a `level.mvar n` in `l`.
-/
meta def fold_mvar {α} : level → (name → α → α) → α → α
| zero f := id
| (succ a) f := fold_mvar a f
| (param a) f := id
| (mvar a) f := f a
| (max a b) f := fold_mvar a f ∘ fold_mvar b f
| (imax a b) f := fold_mvar a f ∘ fold_mvar b f
end level
/-! ### Declarations about `binder` -/
/-- The type of binders containing a name, the binding info and the binding type -/
@[derive decidable_eq, derive inhabited]
meta structure binder :=
(name : name)
(info : binder_info)
(type : expr)
namespace binder
/-- Turn a binder into a string. Uses expr.to_string for the type. -/
protected meta def to_string (b : binder) : string :=
let (l, r) := b.info.brackets in
l ++ b.name.to_string ++ " : " ++ b.type.to_string ++ r
open tactic
meta instance : has_to_string binder := ⟨ binder.to_string ⟩
meta instance : has_to_format binder := ⟨ λ b, b.to_string ⟩
meta instance : has_to_tactic_format binder :=
⟨ λ b, let (l, r) := b.info.brackets in
(λ e, l ++ b.name.to_string ++ " : " ++ e ++ r) <$> pp b.type ⟩
end binder
/-!
### Converting between expressions and numerals
There are a number of ways to convert between expressions and numerals, depending on the input and
output types and whether you want to infer the necessary type classes.
See also the tactics `expr.of_nat`, `expr.of_int`, `expr.of_rat`.
-/
/--
`nat.mk_numeral n` embeds `n` as a numeral expression inside a type with 0, 1, and +.
`type`: an expression representing the target type. This must live in Type 0.
`has_zero`, `has_one`, `has_add`: expressions of the type `has_zero %%type`, etc.
-/
meta def nat.mk_numeral (type has_zero has_one has_add : expr) : ℕ → expr :=
let z : expr := `(@has_zero.zero.{0} %%type %%has_zero),
o : expr := `(@has_one.one.{0} %%type %%has_one) in
nat.binary_rec z
(λ b n e, if n = 0 then o else
if b then `(@bit1.{0} %%type %%has_one %%has_add %%e)
else `(@bit0.{0} %%type %%has_add %%e))
/--
`int.mk_numeral z` embeds `z` as a numeral expression inside a type with 0, 1, +, and -.
`type`: an expression representing the target type. This must live in Type 0.
`has_zero`, `has_one`, `has_add`, `has_neg`: expressions of the type `has_zero %%type`, etc.
-/
meta def int.mk_numeral (type has_zero has_one has_add has_neg : expr) : ℤ → expr
| (int.of_nat n) := n.mk_numeral type has_zero has_one has_add
| -[1+n] := let ne := (n+1).mk_numeral type has_zero has_one has_add in
`(@has_neg.neg.{0} %%type %%has_neg %%ne)
/--
`nat.to_pexpr n` creates a `pexpr` that will evaluate to `n`.
The `pexpr` does not hold any typing information:
`to_expr ``((%%(nat.to_pexpr 5) : ℤ))` will create a native integer numeral `(5 : ℤ)`.
-/
meta def nat.to_pexpr : ℕ → pexpr
| 0 := ``(0)
| 1 := ``(1)
| n := if n % 2 = 0 then ``(bit0 %%(nat.to_pexpr (n/2))) else ``(bit1 %%(nat.to_pexpr (n/2)))
namespace expr
/--
Turns an expression into a natural number, assuming it is only built up from
`has_one.one`, `bit0`, `bit1`, `has_zero.zero`, `nat.zero`, and `nat.succ`.
-/
protected meta def to_nat : expr → option ℕ
| `(has_zero.zero) := some 0
| `(has_one.one) := some 1
| `(bit0 %%e) := bit0 <$> e.to_nat
| `(bit1 %%e) := bit1 <$> e.to_nat
| `(nat.succ %%e) := (+1) <$> e.to_nat
| `(nat.zero) := some 0
| _ := none
/--
Turns an expression into a integer, assuming it is only built up from
`has_one.one`, `bit0`, `bit1`, `has_zero.zero` and a optionally a single `has_neg.neg` as head.
-/
protected meta def to_int : expr → option ℤ
| `(has_neg.neg %%e) := do n ← e.to_nat, some (-n)
| e := coe <$> e.to_nat
/--
`is_num_eq n1 n2` returns true if `n1` and `n2` are both numerals with the same numeral structure,
ignoring differences in type and type class arguments.
-/
meta def is_num_eq : expr → expr → bool
| `(@has_zero.zero _ _) `(@has_zero.zero _ _) := tt
| `(@has_one.one _ _) `(@has_one.one _ _) := tt
| `(bit0 %%a) `(bit0 %%b) := a.is_num_eq b
| `(bit1 %%a) `(bit1 %%b) := a.is_num_eq b
| `(-%%a) `(-%%b) := a.is_num_eq b
| `(%%a/%%a') `(%%b/%%b') := a.is_num_eq b
| _ _ := ff
end expr
/-! ### Declarations about `expr` -/
namespace expr
open tactic
/-- List of names removed by `clean`. All these names must resolve to functions defeq `id`. -/
meta def clean_ids : list name :=
[``id, ``id_rhs, ``id_delta, ``hidden]
/-- Clean an expression by removing `id`s listed in `clean_ids`. -/
meta def clean (e : expr) : expr :=
e.replace (λ e n,
match e with
| (app (app (const n _) _) e') :=
if n ∈ clean_ids then some e' else none
| (app (lam _ _ _ (var 0)) e') := some e'
| _ := none
end)
/-- `replace_with e s s'` replaces ocurrences of `s` with `s'` in `e`. -/
meta def replace_with (e : expr) (s : expr) (s' : expr) : expr :=
e.replace $ λc d, if c = s then some (s'.lift_vars 0 d) else none
/-- Apply a function to each constant (inductive type, defined function etc) in an expression. -/
protected meta def apply_replacement_fun (f : name → name) (e : expr) : expr :=
e.replace $ λ e d,
match e with
| expr.const n ls := some $ expr.const (f n) ls
| _ := none
end
/-- Match a variable. -/
meta def match_var {elab} : expr elab → option ℕ
| (var n) := some n
| _ := none
/-- Match a sort. -/
meta def match_sort {elab} : expr elab → option level
| (sort u) := some u
| _ := none
/-- Match a constant. -/
meta def match_const {elab} : expr elab → option (name × list level)
| (const n lvls) := some (n, lvls)
| _ := none
/-- Match a metavariable. -/
meta def match_mvar {elab} : expr elab →
option (name × name × expr elab)
| (mvar unique pretty type) := some (unique, pretty, type)
| _ := none
/-- Match a local constant. -/
meta def match_local_const {elab} : expr elab →
option (name × name × binder_info × expr elab)
| (local_const unique pretty bi type) := some (unique, pretty, bi, type)
| _ := none
/-- Match an application. -/
meta def match_app {elab} : expr elab → option (expr elab × expr elab)
| (app t u) := some (t, u)
| _ := none
/-- Match an abstraction. -/
meta def match_lam {elab} : expr elab →
option (name × binder_info × expr elab × expr elab)
| (lam var_name bi type body) := some (var_name, bi, type, body)
| _ := none
/-- Match a Π type. -/
meta def match_pi {elab} : expr elab →
option (name × binder_info × expr elab × expr elab)
| (pi var_name bi type body) := some (var_name, bi, type, body)
| _ := none
/-- Match a let. -/
meta def match_elet {elab} : expr elab →
option (name × expr elab × expr elab × expr elab)
| (elet var_name type assignment body) := some (var_name, type, assignment, body)
| _ := none
/-- Match a macro. -/
meta def match_macro {elab} : expr elab →
option (macro_def × list (expr elab))
| (macro df args) := some (df, args)
| _ := none
/-- Tests whether an expression is a meta-variable. -/
meta def is_mvar : expr → bool
| (mvar _ _ _) := tt
| _ := ff
/-- Tests whether an expression is a sort. -/
meta def is_sort : expr → bool
| (sort _) := tt
| e := ff
/-- Get the universe levels of a `const` expression -/
meta def univ_levels : expr → list level
| (const n ls) := ls
| _ := []
/--
Replace any metavariables in the expression with underscores, in preparation for printing
`refine ...` statements.
-/
meta def replace_mvars (e : expr) : expr :=
e.replace (λ e' _, if e'.is_mvar then some (unchecked_cast pexpr.mk_placeholder) else none)
/-- If `e` is a local constant, `to_implicit_local_const e` changes the binder info of `e` to
`implicit`. See also `to_implicit_binder`, which also changes lambdas and pis. -/
meta def to_implicit_local_const : expr → expr
| (expr.local_const uniq n bi t) := expr.local_const uniq n binder_info.implicit t
| e := e
/-- If `e` is a local constant, lamda, or pi expression, `to_implicit_binder e` changes the binder
info of `e` to `implicit`. See also `to_implicit_local_const`, which only changes local constants. -/
meta def to_implicit_binder : expr → expr
| (local_const n₁ n₂ _ d) := local_const n₁ n₂ binder_info.implicit d
| (lam n _ d b) := lam n binder_info.implicit d b
| (pi n _ d b) := pi n binder_info.implicit d b
| e := e
/-- Returns a list of all local constants in an expression (without duplicates). -/
meta def list_local_consts (e : expr) : list expr :=
e.fold [] (λ e' _ es, if e'.is_local_constant then insert e' es else es)
/-- Returns a name_set of all constants in an expression. -/
meta def list_constant (e : expr) : name_set :=
e.fold mk_name_set (λ e' _ es, if e'.is_constant then es.insert e'.const_name else es)
/-- Returns a list of all meta-variables in an expression (without duplicates). -/
meta def list_meta_vars (e : expr) : list expr :=
e.fold [] (λ e' _ es, if e'.is_mvar then insert e' es else es)
/-- Returns a list of all universe meta-variables in an expression (without duplicates). -/
meta def list_univ_meta_vars (e : expr) : list name :=
native.rb_set.to_list $ e.fold native.mk_rb_set $ λ e' i s,
match e' with
| (sort u) := u.fold_mvar (flip native.rb_set.insert) s
| (const _ ls) := ls.foldl (λ s' l, l.fold_mvar (flip native.rb_set.insert) s') s
| _ := s
end
/--
Test `t` contains the specified subexpression `e`, or a metavariable.
This represents the notion that `e` "may occur" in `t`,
possibly after subsequent unification.
-/
meta def contains_expr_or_mvar (t : expr) (e : expr) : bool :=
-- We can't use `t.has_meta_var` here, as that detects universe metavariables, too.
¬ t.list_meta_vars.empty ∨ e.occurs t
/-- Returns a name_set of all constants in an expression starting with a certain prefix. -/
meta def list_names_with_prefix (pre : name) (e : expr) : name_set :=
e.fold mk_name_set $ λ e' _ l,
match e' with
| expr.const n _ := if n.get_prefix = pre then l.insert n else l
| _ := l
end
/-- Returns true if `e` contains a name `n` where `p n` is true.
Returns `true` if `p name.anonymous` is true. -/
meta def contains_constant (e : expr) (p : name → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : bool :=
e.fold ff (λ e' _ b, if p (e'.const_name) then tt else b)
/--
Returns true if `e` contains a `sorry`.
-/
meta def contains_sorry (e : expr) : bool :=
e.fold ff (λ e' _ b, if (is_sorry e').is_some then tt else b)
/--
`app_symbol_in e l` returns true iff `e` is an application of a constant whose name is in `l`.
-/
meta def app_symbol_in (e : expr) (l : list name) : bool :=
match e.get_app_fn with
| (expr.const n _) := n ∈ l
| _ := ff
end
/-- `get_simp_args e` returns the arguments of `e` that simp can reach via congruence lemmas. -/
meta def get_simp_args (e : expr) : tactic (list expr) :=
-- `mk_specialized_congr_lemma_simp` throws an assertion violation if its argument is not an app
if ¬ e.is_app then pure [] else do
cgr ← mk_specialized_congr_lemma_simp e,
pure $ do
(arg_kind, arg) ← cgr.arg_kinds.zip e.get_app_args,
guard $ arg_kind = congr_arg_kind.eq,
pure arg
/-- Simplifies the expression `t` with the specified options.
The result is `(new_e, pr)` with the new expression `new_e` and a proof
`pr : e = new_e`. -/
meta def simp (t : expr)
(cfg : simp_config := {}) (discharger : tactic unit := failed)
(no_defaults := ff) (attr_names : list name := []) (hs : list simp_arg_type := []) :
tactic (expr × expr) :=
do (s, to_unfold) ← mk_simp_set no_defaults attr_names hs,
simplify s to_unfold t cfg `eq discharger
/-- Definitionally simplifies the expression `t` with the specified options.
The result is the simplified expression. -/
meta def dsimp (t : expr)
(cfg : dsimp_config := {})
(no_defaults := ff) (attr_names : list name := []) (hs : list simp_arg_type := []) :
tactic expr :=
do (s, to_unfold) ← mk_simp_set no_defaults attr_names hs,
s.dsimplify to_unfold t cfg
/-- Get the names of the bound variables by a sequence of pis or lambdas. -/
meta def binding_names : expr → list name
| (pi n _ _ e) := n :: e.binding_names
| (lam n _ _ e) := n :: e.binding_names
| e := []
/-- head-reduce a single let expression -/
meta def reduce_let : expr → expr
| (elet _ _ v b) := b.instantiate_var v
| e := e
/-- head-reduce all let expressions -/
meta def reduce_lets : expr → expr
| (elet _ _ v b) := reduce_lets $ b.instantiate_var v
| e := e
/-- Instantiate lambdas in the second argument by expressions from the first. -/
meta def instantiate_lambdas : list expr → expr → expr
| (e'::es) (lam n bi t e) := instantiate_lambdas es (e.instantiate_var e')
| _ e := e
/-- Repeatedly apply `expr.subst`. -/
meta def substs : expr → list expr → expr | e es := es.foldl expr.subst e
/-- `instantiate_lambdas_or_apps es e` instantiates lambdas in `e` by expressions from `es`.
If the length of `es` is larger than the number of lambdas in `e`,
then the term is applied to the remaining terms.
Also reduces head let-expressions in `e`, including those after instantiating all lambdas.
This is very similar to `expr.substs`, but this also reduces head let-expressions. -/
meta def instantiate_lambdas_or_apps : list expr → expr → expr
| (v::es) (lam n bi t b) := instantiate_lambdas_or_apps es $ b.instantiate_var v
| es (elet _ _ v b) := instantiate_lambdas_or_apps es $ b.instantiate_var v
| es e := mk_app e es
/--
Some declarations work with open expressions, i.e. an expr that has free variables.
Terms will free variables are not well-typed, and one should not use them in tactics like
`infer_type` or `unify`. You can still do syntactic analysis/manipulation on them.
The reason for working with open types is for performance: instantiating variables requires
iterating through the expression. In one performance test `pi_binders` was more than 6x
quicker than `mk_local_pis` (when applied to the type of all imported declarations 100x).
-/
library_note "open expressions"
/-- Get the codomain/target of a pi-type.
This definition doesn't instantiate bound variables, and therefore produces a term that is open.
See note [open expressions]. -/
meta def pi_codomain : expr → expr
| (pi n bi d b) := pi_codomain b
| e := e
/-- Get the body/value of a lambda-expression.
This definition doesn't instantiate bound variables, and therefore produces a term that is open.
See note [open expressions]. -/
meta def lambda_body : expr → expr
| (lam n bi d b) := lambda_body b
| e := e
/-- Auxilliary defintion for `pi_binders`.
See note [open expressions]. -/
meta def pi_binders_aux : list binder → expr → list binder × expr
| es (pi n bi d b) := pi_binders_aux (⟨n, bi, d⟩::es) b
| es e := (es, e)
/-- Get the binders and codomain of a pi-type.
This definition doesn't instantiate bound variables, and therefore produces a term that is open.
The.tactic `get_pi_binders` in `tactic.core` does the same, but also instantiates the
free variables.
See note [open expressions]. -/
meta def pi_binders (e : expr) : list binder × expr :=
let (es, e) := pi_binders_aux [] e in (es.reverse, e)
/-- Auxilliary defintion for `get_app_fn_args`. -/
meta def get_app_fn_args_aux : list expr → expr → expr × list expr
| r (app f a) := get_app_fn_args_aux (a::r) f
| r e := (e, r)
/-- A combination of `get_app_fn` and `get_app_args`: lists both the
function and its arguments of an application -/
meta def get_app_fn_args : expr → expr × list expr :=
get_app_fn_args_aux []
/-- `drop_pis es e` instantiates the pis in `e` with the expressions from `es`. -/
meta def drop_pis : list expr → expr → tactic expr
| (list.cons v vs) (pi n bi d b) := do
t ← infer_type v,
guard (t =ₐ d),
drop_pis vs (b.instantiate_var v)
| [] e := return e
| _ _ := failed
/-- `mk_op_lst op empty [x1, x2, ...]` is defined as `op x1 (op x2 ...)`.
Returns `empty` if the list is empty. -/
meta def mk_op_lst (op : expr) (empty : expr) : list expr → expr
| [] := empty
| [e] := e
| (e :: es) := op e $ mk_op_lst es
/-- `mk_and_lst [x1, x2, ...]` is defined as `x1 ∧ (x2 ∧ ...)`, or `true` if the list is empty. -/
meta def mk_and_lst : list expr → expr := mk_op_lst `(and) `(true)
/-- `mk_or_lst [x1, x2, ...]` is defined as `x1 ∨ (x2 ∨ ...)`, or `false` if the list is empty. -/
meta def mk_or_lst : list expr → expr := mk_op_lst `(or) `(false)
/-- `local_binding_info e` returns the binding info of `e` if `e` is a local constant.
Otherwise returns `binder_info.default`. -/
meta def local_binding_info : expr → binder_info
| (expr.local_const _ _ bi _) := bi
| _ := binder_info.default
/-- `is_default_local e` tests whether `e` is a local constant with binder info
`binder_info.default` -/
meta def is_default_local : expr → bool
| (expr.local_const _ _ binder_info.default _) := tt
| _ := ff
/-- `has_local_constant e l` checks whether local constant `l` occurs in expression `e` -/
meta def has_local_constant (e l : expr) : bool :=
e.has_local_in $ mk_name_set.insert l.local_uniq_name
/-- Turns a local constant into a binder -/
meta def to_binder : expr → binder
| (local_const _ nm bi t) := ⟨nm, bi, t⟩
| _ := default binder
/-- Strip-away the context-dependent unique id for the given local const and return: its friendly
`name`, its `binder_info`, and its `type : expr`. -/
meta def get_local_const_kind : expr → name × binder_info × expr
| (expr.local_const _ n bi e) := (n, bi, e)
| _ := (name.anonymous, binder_info.default, expr.const name.anonymous [])
/-- `local_const_set_type e t` sets the type of `e` to `t`, if `e` is a `local_const`. -/
meta def local_const_set_type {elab : bool} : expr elab → expr elab → expr elab
| (expr.local_const x n bi t) new_t := expr.local_const x n bi new_t
| e new_t := e
/-- `unsafe_cast e` freely changes the `elab : bool` parameter of the passed `expr`. Mainly used to
access core `expr` manipulation functions for `pexpr`-based use, but which are restricted to
`expr tt` at the site of definition unnecessarily.
DANGER: Unless you know exactly what you are doing, this is probably not the function you are
looking for. For `pexpr → expr` see `tactic.to_expr`. For `expr → pexpr` see `to_pexpr`. -/
meta def unsafe_cast {elab₁ elab₂ : bool} : expr elab₁ → expr elab₂ := unchecked_cast
/-- `replace_subexprs e mappings` takes an `e : expr` and interprets a `list (expr × expr)` as
a collection of rules for variable replacements. A pair `(f, t)` encodes a rule which says "whenever
`f` is encountered in `e` verbatim, replace it with `t`". -/
meta def replace_subexprs {elab : bool} (e : expr elab) (mappings : list (expr × expr)) : expr elab :=
unsafe_cast $ e.unsafe_cast.replace $ λ e n,
(mappings.filter $ λ ent : expr × expr, ent.1 = e).head'.map prod.snd
/-- `is_implicitly_included_variable e vs` accepts `e`, an `expr.local_const`, and a list `vs` of
other `expr.local_const`s. It determines whether `e` should be considered "available in context"
as a variable by virtue of the fact that the variables `vs` have been deemed such.
For example, given `variables (n : ℕ) [prime n] [ih : even n]`, a reference to `n` implies that
the typeclass instance `prime n` should be included, but `ih : even n` should not.
DANGER: It is possible that for `f : expr` another `expr.local_const`, we have
`is_implicitly_included_variable f vs = ff` but
`is_implicitly_included_variable f (e :: vs) = tt`. This means that one usually wants to
iteratively add a list of local constants (usually, the `variables` declared in the local scope)
which satisfy `is_implicitly_included_variable` to an initial `vs`, repeating if any variables
were added in a particular iteration. The function `all_implicitly_included_variables` below
implements this behaviour.
Note that if `e ∈ vs` then `is_implicitly_included_variable e vs = tt`. -/
meta def is_implicitly_included_variable (e : expr) (vs : list expr) : bool :=
if ¬(e.local_pp_name.to_string.starts_with "_") then
e ∈ vs
else e.local_type.fold tt $ λ se _ b,
if ¬b then ff
else if ¬se.is_local_constant then tt
else se ∈ vs
/-- Private work function for `all_implicitly_included_variables`, performing the actual series of
iterations, tracking with a boolean whether any updates occured this iteration. -/
private meta def all_implicitly_included_variables_aux
: list expr → list expr → list expr → bool → list expr
| [] vs rs tt := all_implicitly_included_variables_aux rs vs [] ff
| [] vs rs ff := vs
| (e :: rest) vs rs b :=
let (vs, rs, b) := if e.is_implicitly_included_variable vs then (e :: vs, rs, tt) else (vs, e :: rs, b) in
all_implicitly_included_variables_aux rest vs rs b
/-- `all_implicitly_included_variables es vs` accepts `es`, a list of `expr.local_const`, and `vs`,
another such list. It returns a list of all variables `e` in `es` or `vs` for which an inclusion
of the variables in `vs` into the local context implies that `e` should also be included. See
`is_implicitly_included_variable e vs` for the details.
In particular, those elements of `vs` are included automatically. -/
meta def all_implicitly_included_variables (es vs : list expr) : list expr :=
all_implicitly_included_variables_aux es vs [] ff
end expr
/-! ### Declarations about `environment` -/
namespace environment
/-- Tests whether `n` is a structure. -/
meta def is_structure (env : environment) (n : name) : bool :=
(env.structure_fields n).is_some
/-- Get the full names of all projections of the structure `n`. Returns `none` if `n` is not a
structure. -/
meta def structure_fields_full (env : environment) (n : name) : option (list name) :=
(env.structure_fields n).map (list.map $ λ n', n ++ n')
/-- Tests whether `nm` is a generalized inductive type that is not a normal inductive type.
Note that `is_ginductive` returns `tt` even on regular inductive types.
This returns `tt` if `nm` is (part of a) mutually defined inductive type or a nested inductive
type. -/
meta def is_ginductive' (e : environment) (nm : name) : bool :=
e.is_ginductive nm ∧ ¬ e.is_inductive nm
/-- For all declarations `d` where `f d = some x` this adds `x` to the returned list. -/
meta def decl_filter_map {α : Type} (e : environment) (f : declaration → option α) : list α :=
e.fold [] $ λ d l, match f d with
| some r := r :: l
| none := l
end
/-- Maps `f` to all declarations in the environment. -/
meta def decl_map {α : Type} (e : environment) (f : declaration → α) : list α :=
e.decl_filter_map $ λ d, some (f d)
/-- Lists all declarations in the environment -/
meta def get_decls (e : environment) : list declaration :=
e.decl_map id
/-- Lists all trusted (non-meta) declarations in the environment -/
meta def get_trusted_decls (e : environment) : list declaration :=
e.decl_filter_map (λ d, if d.is_trusted then some d else none)
/-- Lists the name of all declarations in the environment -/
meta def get_decl_names (e : environment) : list name :=
e.decl_map declaration.to_name
/-- Fold a monad over all declarations in the environment. -/
meta def mfold {α : Type} {m : Type → Type} [monad m] (e : environment) (x : α)
(fn : declaration → α → m α) : m α :=
e.fold (return x) (λ d t, t >>= fn d)
/-- Filters all declarations in the environment. -/
meta def filter (e : environment) (test : declaration → bool) : list declaration :=
e.fold [] $ λ d ds, if test d then d::ds else ds
/-- Filters all declarations in the environment. -/
meta def mfilter (e : environment) (test : declaration → tactic bool) : tactic (list declaration) :=
e.mfold [] $ λ d ds, do b ← test d, return $ if b then d::ds else ds
/-- Checks whether `s` is a prefix of the file where `n` is declared.
This is used to check whether `n` is declared in mathlib, where `s` is the mathlib directory. -/
meta def is_prefix_of_file (e : environment) (s : string) (n : name) : bool :=
s.is_prefix_of $ (e.decl_olean n).get_or_else ""
end environment
/-!
### `is_eta_expansion`
In this section we define the tactic `is_eta_expansion` which checks whether an expression
is an eta-expansion of a structure. (not to be confused with eta-expanion for `λ`).
-/
namespace expr
open tactic
/-- `is_eta_expansion_of args univs l` checks whether for all elements `(nm, pr)` in `l` we have
`pr = nm.{univs} args`.
Used in `is_eta_expansion`, where `l` consists of the projections and the fields of the value we
want to eta-reduce. -/
meta def is_eta_expansion_of (args : list expr) (univs : list level) (l : list (name × expr)) :
bool :=
l.all $ λ⟨proj, val⟩, val = (const proj univs).mk_app args
/-- `is_eta_expansion_test l` checks whether there is a list of expresions `args` such that for all
elements `(nm, pr)` in `l` we have `pr = nm args`. If so, returns the last element of `args`.
Used in `is_eta_expansion`, where `l` consists of the projections and the fields of the value we
want to eta-reduce. -/
meta def is_eta_expansion_test : list (name × expr) → option expr
| [] := none
| (⟨proj, val⟩::l) :=
match val.get_app_fn with
| (const nm univs : expr) :=
if nm = proj then
let args := val.get_app_args in
let e := args.ilast in
if is_eta_expansion_of args univs l then some e else none
else
none
| _ := none
end
/-- `is_eta_expansion_aux val l` checks whether `val` can be eta-reduced to an expression `e`.
Here `l` is intended to consists of the projections and the fields of `val`.
This tactic calls `is_eta_expansion_test l`, but first removes all proofs from the list `l` and
afterward checks whether the resulting expression `e` unifies with `val`.
This last check is necessary, because `val` and `e` might have different types. -/
meta def is_eta_expansion_aux (val : expr) (l : list (name × expr)) : tactic (option expr) :=
do l' ← l.mfilter (λ⟨proj, val⟩, bnot <$> is_proof val),
match is_eta_expansion_test l' with
| some e := option.map (λ _, e) <$> try_core (unify e val)
| none := return none
end
/-- `is_eta_expansion val` checks whether there is an expression `e` such that `val` is the
eta-expansion of `e`.
With eta-expansion we here mean the eta-expansion of a structure, not of a function.
For example, the eta-expansion of `x : α × β` is `⟨x.1, x.2⟩`.
This assumes that `val` is a fully-applied application of the constructor of a structure.
This is useful to reduce expressions generated by the notation
`{ field_1 := _, ..other_structure }`
If `other_structure` is itself a field of the structure, then the elaborator will insert an
eta-expanded version of `other_structure`. -/
meta def is_eta_expansion (val : expr) : tactic (option expr) := do
e ← get_env,
type ← infer_type val,
projs ← e.structure_fields_full type.get_app_fn.const_name,
let args := (val.get_app_args).drop type.get_app_args.length,
is_eta_expansion_aux val (projs.zip args)
end expr
/-! ### Declarations about `declaration` -/
namespace declaration
open tactic
/--
`declaration.update_with_fun f tgt decl`
sets the name of the given `decl : declaration` to `tgt`, and applies `f` to the names
of all `expr.const`s which appear in the value or type of `decl`.
-/
protected meta def update_with_fun (f : name → name) (tgt : name) (decl : declaration) :
declaration :=
let decl := decl.update_name $ tgt in
let decl := decl.update_type $ decl.type.apply_replacement_fun f in
decl.update_value $ decl.value.apply_replacement_fun f
/-- Checks whether the declaration is declared in the current file.
This is a simple wrapper around `environment.in_current_file`
Use `environment.in_current_file` instead if performance matters. -/
meta def in_current_file (d : declaration) : tactic bool :=
do e ← get_env, return $ e.in_current_file d.to_name
/-- Checks whether a declaration is a theorem -/
meta def is_theorem : declaration → bool
| (thm _ _ _ _) := tt
| _ := ff
/-- Checks whether a declaration is a constant -/
meta def is_constant : declaration → bool
| (cnst _ _ _ _) := tt
| _ := ff
/-- Checks whether a declaration is a axiom -/
meta def is_axiom : declaration → bool
| (ax _ _ _) := tt
| _ := ff
/-- Checks whether a declaration is automatically generated in the environment.
There is no cheap way to check whether a declaration in the namespace of a generalized
inductive type is automatically generated, so for now we say that all of them are automatically
generated. -/
meta def is_auto_generated (e : environment) (d : declaration) : bool :=
e.is_constructor d.to_name ∨
(e.is_projection d.to_name).is_some ∨
(e.is_constructor d.to_name.get_prefix ∧
d.to_name.last ∈ ["inj", "inj_eq", "sizeof_spec", "inj_arrow"]) ∨
(e.is_inductive d.to_name.get_prefix ∧
d.to_name.last ∈ ["below", "binduction_on", "brec_on", "cases_on", "dcases_on", "drec_on", "drec",
"rec", "rec_on", "no_confusion", "no_confusion_type", "sizeof", "ibelow", "has_sizeof_inst"]) ∨
d.to_name.has_prefix (λ nm, e.is_ginductive' nm)
/--
Returns true iff `d` is an automatically-generated or internal declaration.
-/
meta def is_auto_or_internal (env : environment) (d : declaration) : bool :=
d.to_name.is_internal || d.is_auto_generated env
/-- Returns the list of universe levels of a declaration. -/
meta def univ_levels (d : declaration) : list level :=
d.univ_params.map level.param
/-- Returns the `reducibility_hints` field of a `defn`, and `reducibility_hints.opaque` otherwise -/
protected meta def reducibility_hints : declaration → reducibility_hints
| (declaration.defn _ _ _ _ red _) := red
| _ := _root_.reducibility_hints.opaque
/-- formats the arguments of a `declaration.thm` -/
private meta def print_thm (nm : name) (tp : expr) (body : task expr) : tactic format :=
do tp ← pp tp, body ← pp body.get,
return $ "<theorem " ++ to_fmt nm ++ " : " ++ tp ++ " := " ++ body ++ ">"
/-- formats the arguments of a `declaration.defn` -/
private meta def print_defn (nm : name) (tp : expr) (body : expr) (is_trusted : bool) :
tactic format :=
do tp ← pp tp, body ← pp body,
return $ "<" ++ (if is_trusted then "def " else "meta def ") ++ to_fmt nm ++ " : " ++ tp ++ " := "
++ body ++ ">"
/-- formats the arguments of a `declaration.cnst` -/
private meta def print_cnst (nm : name) (tp : expr) (is_trusted : bool) : tactic format :=
do tp ← pp tp,
return $ "<" ++ (if is_trusted then "constant " else "meta constant ") ++ to_fmt nm ++ " : "
++ tp ++ ">"
/-- formats the arguments of a `declaration.ax` -/
private meta def print_ax (nm : name) (tp : expr) : tactic format :=
do tp ← pp tp,
return $ "<axiom " ++ to_fmt nm ++ " : " ++ tp ++ ">"
/-- pretty-prints a `declaration` object. -/
meta def to_tactic_format : declaration → tactic format
| (declaration.thm nm _ tp bd) := print_thm nm tp bd
| (declaration.defn nm _ tp bd _ is_trusted) := print_defn nm tp bd is_trusted
| (declaration.cnst nm _ tp is_trusted) := print_cnst nm tp is_trusted
| (declaration.ax nm _ tp) := print_ax nm tp
meta instance : has_to_tactic_format declaration :=
⟨to_tactic_format⟩
end declaration
meta instance pexpr.decidable_eq {elab} : decidable_eq (expr elab) :=
unchecked_cast
expr.has_decidable_eq
|
a9fe72217bbbcf900dcb6ef0d791e08dcf562805 | 592ee40978ac7604005a4e0d35bbc4b467389241 | /Library/generated/mathscheme-lean/Pointed1Magma.lean | 65f3a1a6811fb0b5da38889197c3ee4708b54a1d | [] | no_license | ysharoda/Deriving-Definitions | 3e149e6641fae440badd35ac110a0bd705a49ad2 | dfecb27572022de3d4aa702cae8db19957523a59 | refs/heads/master | 1,679,127,857,700 | 1,615,939,007,000 | 1,615,939,007,000 | 229,785,731 | 4 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,710 | lean | import init.data.nat.basic
import init.data.fin.basic
import data.vector
import .Prelude
open Staged
open nat
open fin
open vector
section Pointed1Magma
structure Pointed1Magma (A : Type) : Type :=
(one : A)
(op : (A → (A → A)))
open Pointed1Magma
structure Sig (AS : Type) : Type :=
(oneS : AS)
(opS : (AS → (AS → AS)))
structure Product (A : Type) : Type :=
(oneP : (Prod A A))
(opP : ((Prod A A) → ((Prod A A) → (Prod A A))))
structure Hom {A1 : Type} {A2 : Type} (Po1 : (Pointed1Magma A1)) (Po2 : (Pointed1Magma A2)) : Type :=
(hom : (A1 → A2))
(pres_one : (hom (one Po1)) = (one Po2))
(pres_op : (∀ {x1 x2 : A1} , (hom ((op Po1) x1 x2)) = ((op Po2) (hom x1) (hom x2))))
structure RelInterp {A1 : Type} {A2 : Type} (Po1 : (Pointed1Magma A1)) (Po2 : (Pointed1Magma A2)) : Type 1 :=
(interp : (A1 → (A2 → Type)))
(interp_one : (interp (one Po1) (one Po2)))
(interp_op : (∀ {x1 x2 : A1} {y1 y2 : A2} , ((interp x1 y1) → ((interp x2 y2) → (interp ((op Po1) x1 x2) ((op Po2) y1 y2))))))
inductive Pointed1MagmaTerm : Type
| oneL : Pointed1MagmaTerm
| opL : (Pointed1MagmaTerm → (Pointed1MagmaTerm → Pointed1MagmaTerm))
open Pointed1MagmaTerm
inductive ClPointed1MagmaTerm (A : Type) : Type
| sing : (A → ClPointed1MagmaTerm)
| oneCl : ClPointed1MagmaTerm
| opCl : (ClPointed1MagmaTerm → (ClPointed1MagmaTerm → ClPointed1MagmaTerm))
open ClPointed1MagmaTerm
inductive OpPointed1MagmaTerm (n : ℕ) : Type
| v : ((fin n) → OpPointed1MagmaTerm)
| oneOL : OpPointed1MagmaTerm
| opOL : (OpPointed1MagmaTerm → (OpPointed1MagmaTerm → OpPointed1MagmaTerm))
open OpPointed1MagmaTerm
inductive OpPointed1MagmaTerm2 (n : ℕ) (A : Type) : Type
| v2 : ((fin n) → OpPointed1MagmaTerm2)
| sing2 : (A → OpPointed1MagmaTerm2)
| oneOL2 : OpPointed1MagmaTerm2
| opOL2 : (OpPointed1MagmaTerm2 → (OpPointed1MagmaTerm2 → OpPointed1MagmaTerm2))
open OpPointed1MagmaTerm2
def simplifyCl {A : Type} : ((ClPointed1MagmaTerm A) → (ClPointed1MagmaTerm A))
| oneCl := oneCl
| (opCl x1 x2) := (opCl (simplifyCl x1) (simplifyCl x2))
| (sing x1) := (sing x1)
def simplifyOpB {n : ℕ} : ((OpPointed1MagmaTerm n) → (OpPointed1MagmaTerm n))
| oneOL := oneOL
| (opOL x1 x2) := (opOL (simplifyOpB x1) (simplifyOpB x2))
| (v x1) := (v x1)
def simplifyOp {n : ℕ} {A : Type} : ((OpPointed1MagmaTerm2 n A) → (OpPointed1MagmaTerm2 n A))
| oneOL2 := oneOL2
| (opOL2 x1 x2) := (opOL2 (simplifyOp x1) (simplifyOp x2))
| (v2 x1) := (v2 x1)
| (sing2 x1) := (sing2 x1)
def evalB {A : Type} : ((Pointed1Magma A) → (Pointed1MagmaTerm → A))
| Po oneL := (one Po)
| Po (opL x1 x2) := ((op Po) (evalB Po x1) (evalB Po x2))
def evalCl {A : Type} : ((Pointed1Magma A) → ((ClPointed1MagmaTerm A) → A))
| Po (sing x1) := x1
| Po oneCl := (one Po)
| Po (opCl x1 x2) := ((op Po) (evalCl Po x1) (evalCl Po x2))
def evalOpB {A : Type} {n : ℕ} : ((Pointed1Magma A) → ((vector A n) → ((OpPointed1MagmaTerm n) → A)))
| Po vars (v x1) := (nth vars x1)
| Po vars oneOL := (one Po)
| Po vars (opOL x1 x2) := ((op Po) (evalOpB Po vars x1) (evalOpB Po vars x2))
def evalOp {A : Type} {n : ℕ} : ((Pointed1Magma A) → ((vector A n) → ((OpPointed1MagmaTerm2 n A) → A)))
| Po vars (v2 x1) := (nth vars x1)
| Po vars (sing2 x1) := x1
| Po vars oneOL2 := (one Po)
| Po vars (opOL2 x1 x2) := ((op Po) (evalOp Po vars x1) (evalOp Po vars x2))
def inductionB {P : (Pointed1MagmaTerm → Type)} : ((P oneL) → ((∀ (x1 x2 : Pointed1MagmaTerm) , ((P x1) → ((P x2) → (P (opL x1 x2))))) → (∀ (x : Pointed1MagmaTerm) , (P x))))
| p1l popl oneL := p1l
| p1l popl (opL x1 x2) := (popl _ _ (inductionB p1l popl x1) (inductionB p1l popl x2))
def inductionCl {A : Type} {P : ((ClPointed1MagmaTerm A) → Type)} : ((∀ (x1 : A) , (P (sing x1))) → ((P oneCl) → ((∀ (x1 x2 : (ClPointed1MagmaTerm A)) , ((P x1) → ((P x2) → (P (opCl x1 x2))))) → (∀ (x : (ClPointed1MagmaTerm A)) , (P x)))))
| psing p1cl popcl (sing x1) := (psing x1)
| psing p1cl popcl oneCl := p1cl
| psing p1cl popcl (opCl x1 x2) := (popcl _ _ (inductionCl psing p1cl popcl x1) (inductionCl psing p1cl popcl x2))
def inductionOpB {n : ℕ} {P : ((OpPointed1MagmaTerm n) → Type)} : ((∀ (fin : (fin n)) , (P (v fin))) → ((P oneOL) → ((∀ (x1 x2 : (OpPointed1MagmaTerm n)) , ((P x1) → ((P x2) → (P (opOL x1 x2))))) → (∀ (x : (OpPointed1MagmaTerm n)) , (P x)))))
| pv p1ol popol (v x1) := (pv x1)
| pv p1ol popol oneOL := p1ol
| pv p1ol popol (opOL x1 x2) := (popol _ _ (inductionOpB pv p1ol popol x1) (inductionOpB pv p1ol popol x2))
def inductionOp {n : ℕ} {A : Type} {P : ((OpPointed1MagmaTerm2 n A) → Type)} : ((∀ (fin : (fin n)) , (P (v2 fin))) → ((∀ (x1 : A) , (P (sing2 x1))) → ((P oneOL2) → ((∀ (x1 x2 : (OpPointed1MagmaTerm2 n A)) , ((P x1) → ((P x2) → (P (opOL2 x1 x2))))) → (∀ (x : (OpPointed1MagmaTerm2 n A)) , (P x))))))
| pv2 psing2 p1ol2 popol2 (v2 x1) := (pv2 x1)
| pv2 psing2 p1ol2 popol2 (sing2 x1) := (psing2 x1)
| pv2 psing2 p1ol2 popol2 oneOL2 := p1ol2
| pv2 psing2 p1ol2 popol2 (opOL2 x1 x2) := (popol2 _ _ (inductionOp pv2 psing2 p1ol2 popol2 x1) (inductionOp pv2 psing2 p1ol2 popol2 x2))
def stageB : (Pointed1MagmaTerm → (Staged Pointed1MagmaTerm))
| oneL := (Now oneL)
| (opL x1 x2) := (stage2 opL (codeLift2 opL) (stageB x1) (stageB x2))
def stageCl {A : Type} : ((ClPointed1MagmaTerm A) → (Staged (ClPointed1MagmaTerm A)))
| (sing x1) := (Now (sing x1))
| oneCl := (Now oneCl)
| (opCl x1 x2) := (stage2 opCl (codeLift2 opCl) (stageCl x1) (stageCl x2))
def stageOpB {n : ℕ} : ((OpPointed1MagmaTerm n) → (Staged (OpPointed1MagmaTerm n)))
| (v x1) := (const (code (v x1)))
| oneOL := (Now oneOL)
| (opOL x1 x2) := (stage2 opOL (codeLift2 opOL) (stageOpB x1) (stageOpB x2))
def stageOp {n : ℕ} {A : Type} : ((OpPointed1MagmaTerm2 n A) → (Staged (OpPointed1MagmaTerm2 n A)))
| (sing2 x1) := (Now (sing2 x1))
| (v2 x1) := (const (code (v2 x1)))
| oneOL2 := (Now oneOL2)
| (opOL2 x1 x2) := (stage2 opOL2 (codeLift2 opOL2) (stageOp x1) (stageOp x2))
structure StagedRepr (A : Type) (Repr : (Type → Type)) : Type :=
(oneT : (Repr A))
(opT : ((Repr A) → ((Repr A) → (Repr A))))
end Pointed1Magma |
4cee14bef893d30a196eb75591cf2b12c33775ae | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/logic/small.lean | b54426e440b757f41ab4604ebfb45ec9f5c93cef | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,079 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import data.vector.basic
/-!
# Small types
A type is `w`-small if there exists an equivalence to some `S : Type w`.
We provide a noncomputable model `shrink α : Type w`, and `equiv_shrink α : α ≃ shrink α`.
A subsingleton type is `w`-small for any `w`.
If `α ≃ β`, then `small.{w} α ↔ small.{w} β`.
-/
universes u w v
/--
A type is `small.{w}` if there exists an equivalence to some `S : Type w`.
-/
class small (α : Type v) : Prop :=
(equiv_small : ∃ (S : Type w), nonempty (α ≃ S))
/--
Constructor for `small α` from an explicit witness type and equivalence.
-/
lemma small.mk' {α : Type v} {S : Type w} (e : α ≃ S) : small.{w} α :=
⟨⟨S, ⟨e⟩⟩⟩
/--
An arbitrarily chosen model in `Type w` for a `w`-small type.
-/
@[nolint has_inhabited_instance]
def shrink (α : Type v) [small.{w} α] : Type w :=
classical.some (@small.equiv_small α _)
/--
The noncomputable equivalence between a `w`-small type and a model.
-/
noncomputable
def equiv_shrink (α : Type v) [small.{w} α] : α ≃ shrink α :=
nonempty.some (classical.some_spec (@small.equiv_small α _))
@[priority 100]
instance small_self (α : Type v) : small.{v} α :=
small.mk' (equiv.refl _)
@[priority 100]
instance small_max (α : Type v) : small.{max w v} α :=
small.mk' equiv.ulift.{w}.symm
instance small_ulift (α : Type v) : small.{v} (ulift.{w} α) :=
small.mk' equiv.ulift
theorem small_type : small.{max (u+1) v} (Type u) := small_max.{max (u+1) v} _
section
open_locale classical
theorem small_map {α : Type*} {β : Type*} [hβ : small.{w} β] (e : α ≃ β) : small.{w} α :=
let ⟨γ, ⟨f⟩⟩ := hβ.equiv_small in small.mk' (e.trans f)
theorem small_congr {α : Type*} {β : Type*} (e : α ≃ β) : small.{w} α ↔ small.{w} β :=
⟨λ h, @small_map _ _ h e.symm, λ h, @small_map _ _ h e⟩
instance small_subtype (α : Type v) [small.{w} α] (P : α → Prop) : small.{w} { x // P x } :=
small_map (equiv_shrink α).subtype_equiv_of_subtype'
theorem small_of_injective {α : Type v} {β : Type w} [small.{u} β] {f : α → β}
(hf : function.injective f) : small.{u} α :=
small_map (equiv.of_injective f hf)
theorem small_of_surjective {α : Type v} {β : Type w} [small.{u} α] {f : α → β}
(hf : function.surjective f) : small.{u} β :=
small_of_injective (function.injective_surj_inv hf)
theorem small_subset {α : Type v} {s t : set α} (hts : t ⊆ s) [small.{u} s] : small.{u} t :=
let f : t → s := λ x, ⟨x, hts x.prop⟩ in
@small_of_injective _ _ _ f (λ x y hxy, subtype.ext (subtype.mk.inj hxy))
@[priority 100]
instance small_subsingleton (α : Type v) [subsingleton α] : small.{w} α :=
begin
rcases is_empty_or_nonempty α; resetI,
{ apply small_map (equiv.equiv_pempty α) },
{ apply small_map equiv.punit_of_nonempty_of_subsingleton, assumption' },
end
/-!
We don't define `small_of_fintype` or `small_of_encodable` in this file,
to keep imports to `logic` to a minimum.
-/
instance small_Pi {α} (β : α → Type*) [small.{w} α] [∀ a, small.{w} (β a)] :
small.{w} (Π a, β a) :=
⟨⟨Π a' : shrink α, shrink (β ((equiv_shrink α).symm a')),
⟨equiv.Pi_congr (equiv_shrink α) (λ a, by simpa using equiv_shrink (β a))⟩⟩⟩
instance small_sigma {α} (β : α → Type*) [small.{w} α] [∀ a, small.{w} (β a)] :
small.{w} (Σ a, β a) :=
⟨⟨Σ a' : shrink α, shrink (β ((equiv_shrink α).symm a')),
⟨equiv.sigma_congr (equiv_shrink α) (λ a, by simpa using equiv_shrink (β a))⟩⟩⟩
instance small_prod {α β} [small.{w} α] [small.{w} β] : small.{w} (α × β) :=
⟨⟨shrink α × shrink β,
⟨equiv.prod_congr (equiv_shrink α) (equiv_shrink β)⟩⟩⟩
instance small_sum {α β} [small.{w} α] [small.{w} β] : small.{w} (α ⊕ β) :=
⟨⟨shrink α ⊕ shrink β,
⟨equiv.sum_congr (equiv_shrink α) (equiv_shrink β)⟩⟩⟩
instance small_set {α} [small.{w} α] : small.{w} (set α) :=
⟨⟨set (shrink α), ⟨equiv.set.congr (equiv_shrink α)⟩⟩⟩
instance small_range {α : Type v} {β : Type w} (f : α → β) [small.{u} α] :
small.{u} (set.range f) :=
small_of_surjective set.surjective_onto_range
instance small_image {α : Type v} {β : Type w} (f : α → β) (S : set α) [small.{u} S] :
small.{u} (f '' S) :=
small_of_surjective set.surjective_onto_image
theorem not_small_type : ¬ small.{u} (Type (max u v))
| ⟨⟨S, ⟨e⟩⟩⟩ := @function.cantor_injective (Σ α, e.symm α)
(λ a, ⟨_, cast (e.3 _).symm a⟩)
(λ a b e, (cast_inj _).1 $ eq_of_heq (sigma.mk.inj e).2)
instance small_vector {α : Type v} {n : ℕ} [small.{u} α] :
small.{u} (vector α n) :=
small_of_injective (equiv.vector_equiv_fin α n).injective
instance small_list {α : Type v} [small.{u} α] :
small.{u} (list α) :=
begin
let e : (Σ n, vector α n) ≃ list α := equiv.sigma_fiber_equiv list.length,
exact small_of_surjective e.surjective,
end
end
|
fb75436bb1158312e2ac7b867aba86bffec8d476 | 82e44445c70db0f03e30d7be725775f122d72f3e | /src/field_theory/minpoly.lean | e3dac9b2afe7fd53f4244ecca18c7590f4f06f5f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | stjordanis/mathlib | 51e286d19140e3788ef2c470bc7b953e4991f0c9 | 2568d41bca08f5d6bf39d915434c8447e21f42ee | refs/heads/master | 1,631,748,053,501 | 1,627,938,886,000 | 1,627,938,886,000 | 228,728,358 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,576,630,588,000 | 1,576,630,587,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 16,414 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johan Commelin
-/
import data.polynomial.field_division
import ring_theory.integral_closure
import ring_theory.polynomial.gauss_lemma
/-!
# Minimal polynomials
This file defines the minimal polynomial of an element `x` of an `A`-algebra `B`,
under the assumption that x is integral over `A`.
After stating the defining property we specialize to the setting of field extensions
and derive some well-known properties, amongst which the fact that minimal polynomials
are irreducible, and uniquely determined by their defining property.
-/
open_locale classical
open polynomial set function
variables {A B : Type*}
section min_poly_def
variables (A) [comm_ring A] [ring B] [algebra A B]
/--
Suppose `x : B`, where `B` is an `A`-algebra.
The minimal polynomial `minpoly A x` of `x`
is a monic polynomial with coefficients in `A` of smallest degree that has `x` as its root,
if such exists (`is_integral A x`) or zero otherwise.
For example, if `V` is a `𝕜`-vector space for some field `𝕜` and `f : V →ₗ[𝕜] V` then
the minimal polynomial of `f` is `minpoly 𝕜 f`.
-/
noncomputable def minpoly (x : B) : polynomial A :=
if hx : is_integral A x then well_founded.min degree_lt_wf _ hx else 0
end min_poly_def
namespace minpoly
section ring
variables [comm_ring A] [ring B] [algebra A B]
variables {x : B}
/-- A minimal polynomial is monic. -/
lemma monic (hx : is_integral A x) : monic (minpoly A x) :=
by { delta minpoly, rw dif_pos hx, exact (well_founded.min_mem degree_lt_wf _ hx).1 }
/-- A minimal polynomial is nonzero. -/
lemma ne_zero [nontrivial A] (hx : is_integral A x) : minpoly A x ≠ 0 :=
ne_zero_of_monic (monic hx)
lemma eq_zero (hx : ¬ is_integral A x) : minpoly A x = 0 :=
dif_neg hx
variables (A x)
/-- An element is a root of its minimal polynomial. -/
@[simp] lemma aeval : aeval x (minpoly A x) = 0 :=
begin
delta minpoly, split_ifs with hx,
{ exact (well_founded.min_mem degree_lt_wf _ hx).2 },
{ exact aeval_zero _ }
end
lemma mem_range_of_degree_eq_one (hx : (minpoly A x).degree = 1) : x ∈ (algebra_map A B).range :=
begin
have h : is_integral A x,
{ by_contra h,
rw [eq_zero h, degree_zero, ←with_bot.coe_one] at hx,
exact (ne_of_lt (show ⊥ < ↑1, from with_bot.bot_lt_coe 1) hx) },
have key := minpoly.aeval A x,
rw [eq_X_add_C_of_degree_eq_one hx, (minpoly.monic h).leading_coeff, C_1, one_mul, aeval_add,
aeval_C, aeval_X, ←eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, ←ring_hom.map_neg] at key,
exact ⟨-(minpoly A x).coeff 0, key.symm⟩,
end
/-- The defining property of the minimal polynomial of an element `x`:
it is the monic polynomial with smallest degree that has `x` as its root. -/
lemma min {p : polynomial A} (pmonic : p.monic) (hp : polynomial.aeval x p = 0) :
degree (minpoly A x) ≤ degree p :=
begin
delta minpoly, split_ifs with hx,
{ exact le_of_not_lt (well_founded.not_lt_min degree_lt_wf _ hx ⟨pmonic, hp⟩) },
{ simp only [degree_zero, bot_le] }
end
end ring
section integral_domain
variables [integral_domain A]
section ring
variables [ring B] [algebra A B] [nontrivial B]
variables {x : B}
/-- The degree of a minimal polynomial, as a natural number, is positive. -/
lemma nat_degree_pos (hx : is_integral A x) : 0 < nat_degree (minpoly A x) :=
begin
rw pos_iff_ne_zero,
intro ndeg_eq_zero,
have eq_one : minpoly A x = 1,
{ rw eq_C_of_nat_degree_eq_zero ndeg_eq_zero, convert C_1,
simpa only [ndeg_eq_zero.symm] using (monic hx).leading_coeff },
simpa only [eq_one, alg_hom.map_one, one_ne_zero] using aeval A x
end
/-- The degree of a minimal polynomial is positive. -/
lemma degree_pos (hx : is_integral A x) : 0 < degree (minpoly A x) :=
nat_degree_pos_iff_degree_pos.mp (nat_degree_pos hx)
/-- If `B/A` is an injective ring extension, and `a` is an element of `A`,
then the minimal polynomial of `algebra_map A B a` is `X - C a`. -/
lemma eq_X_sub_C_of_algebra_map_inj [nontrivial A]
(a : A) (hf : function.injective (algebra_map A B)) :
minpoly A (algebra_map A B a) = X - C a :=
begin
have hdegle : (minpoly A (algebra_map A B a)).nat_degree ≤ 1,
{ apply with_bot.coe_le_coe.1,
rw [←degree_eq_nat_degree (ne_zero (@is_integral_algebra_map A B _ _ _ a)),
with_top.coe_one, ←degree_X_sub_C a],
refine min A (algebra_map A B a) (monic_X_sub_C a) _,
simp only [aeval_C, aeval_X, alg_hom.map_sub, sub_self] },
have hdeg : (minpoly A (algebra_map A B a)).degree = 1,
{ apply (degree_eq_iff_nat_degree_eq (ne_zero (@is_integral_algebra_map A B _ _ _ a))).2,
apply le_antisymm hdegle (nat_degree_pos (@is_integral_algebra_map A B _ _ _ a)) },
have hrw := eq_X_add_C_of_degree_eq_one hdeg,
simp only [monic (@is_integral_algebra_map A B _ _ _ a), one_mul,
monic.leading_coeff, ring_hom.map_one] at hrw,
have h0 : (minpoly A (algebra_map A B a)).coeff 0 = -a,
{ have hroot := aeval A (algebra_map A B a),
rw [hrw, add_comm] at hroot,
simp only [aeval_C, aeval_X, aeval_add] at hroot,
replace hroot := eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero hroot,
rw [←ring_hom.map_neg _ a] at hroot,
exact (hf hroot) },
rw hrw,
simp only [h0, ring_hom.map_neg, sub_eq_add_neg],
end
variables (A x)
/-- A minimal polynomial is not a unit. -/
lemma not_is_unit : ¬ is_unit (minpoly A x) :=
begin
by_cases hx : is_integral A x,
{ assume H, exact (ne_of_lt (degree_pos hx)).symm (degree_eq_zero_of_is_unit H) },
{ delta minpoly, rw dif_neg hx, simp only [not_is_unit_zero, not_false_iff] }
end
end ring
section domain
variables [domain B] [algebra A B]
variables {x : B}
/-- If `a` strictly divides the minimal polynomial of `x`, then `x` cannot be a root for `a`. -/
lemma aeval_ne_zero_of_dvd_not_unit_minpoly {a : polynomial A} (hx : is_integral A x)
(hamonic : a.monic) (hdvd : dvd_not_unit a (minpoly A x)) :
polynomial.aeval x a ≠ 0 :=
begin
intro ha,
refine not_lt_of_ge (minpoly.min A x hamonic ha) _,
obtain ⟨hzeroa, b, hb_nunit, prod⟩ := hdvd,
have hbmonic : b.monic,
{ rw monic.def,
have := monic hx,
rwa [monic.def, prod, leading_coeff_mul, monic.def.mp hamonic, one_mul] at this },
have hzerob : b ≠ 0 := hbmonic.ne_zero,
have degbzero : 0 < b.nat_degree,
{ apply nat.pos_of_ne_zero,
intro h,
have h₁ := eq_C_of_nat_degree_eq_zero h,
rw [←h, ←leading_coeff, monic.def.1 hbmonic, C_1] at h₁,
rw h₁ at hb_nunit,
have := is_unit_one,
contradiction },
rw [prod, degree_mul, degree_eq_nat_degree hzeroa, degree_eq_nat_degree hzerob],
exact_mod_cast lt_add_of_pos_right _ degbzero,
end
/-- A minimal polynomial is irreducible. -/
lemma irreducible (hx : is_integral A x) : irreducible (minpoly A x) :=
begin
cases irreducible_or_factor (minpoly A x) (not_is_unit A x) with hirr hred,
{ exact hirr },
exfalso,
obtain ⟨a, b, ha_nunit, hb_nunit, hab_eq⟩ := hred,
have coeff_prod : a.leading_coeff * b.leading_coeff = 1,
{ rw [←monic.def.1 (monic hx), ←hab_eq],
simp only [leading_coeff_mul] },
have hamonic : (a * C b.leading_coeff).monic,
{ rw monic.def,
simp only [coeff_prod, leading_coeff_mul, leading_coeff_C] },
have hbmonic : (b * C a.leading_coeff).monic,
{ rw [monic.def, mul_comm],
simp only [coeff_prod, leading_coeff_mul, leading_coeff_C] },
have prod : minpoly A x = (a * C b.leading_coeff) * (b * C a.leading_coeff),
{ symmetry,
calc a * C b.leading_coeff * (b * C a.leading_coeff)
= a * b * (C a.leading_coeff * C b.leading_coeff) : by ring
... = a * b * (C (a.leading_coeff * b.leading_coeff)) : by simp only [ring_hom.map_mul]
... = a * b : by rw [coeff_prod, C_1, mul_one]
... = minpoly A x : hab_eq },
have hzero := aeval A x,
rw [prod, aeval_mul, mul_eq_zero] at hzero,
cases hzero,
{ refine aeval_ne_zero_of_dvd_not_unit_minpoly hx hamonic _ hzero,
exact ⟨hamonic.ne_zero, _, mt is_unit_of_mul_is_unit_left hb_nunit, prod⟩ },
{ refine aeval_ne_zero_of_dvd_not_unit_minpoly hx hbmonic _ hzero,
rw mul_comm at prod,
exact ⟨hbmonic.ne_zero, _, mt is_unit_of_mul_is_unit_left ha_nunit, prod⟩ },
end
end domain
end integral_domain
section field
variables [field A]
section ring
variables [ring B] [algebra A B]
variables {x : B}
variables (A x)
/-- If an element `x` is a root of a nonzero polynomial `p`,
then the degree of `p` is at least the degree of the minimal polynomial of `x`. -/
lemma degree_le_of_ne_zero
{p : polynomial A} (pnz : p ≠ 0) (hp : polynomial.aeval x p = 0) :
degree (minpoly A x) ≤ degree p :=
calc degree (minpoly A x) ≤ degree (p * C (leading_coeff p)⁻¹) :
min A x (monic_mul_leading_coeff_inv pnz) (by simp [hp])
... = degree p : degree_mul_leading_coeff_inv p pnz
/-- The minimal polynomial of an element `x` is uniquely characterized by its defining property:
if there is another monic polynomial of minimal degree that has `x` as a root,
then this polynomial is equal to the minimal polynomial of `x`. -/
lemma unique {p : polynomial A}
(pmonic : p.monic) (hp : polynomial.aeval x p = 0)
(pmin : ∀ q : polynomial A, q.monic → polynomial.aeval x q = 0 → degree p ≤ degree q) :
p = minpoly A x :=
begin
have hx : is_integral A x := ⟨p, pmonic, hp⟩,
symmetry, apply eq_of_sub_eq_zero,
by_contra hnz,
have := degree_le_of_ne_zero A x hnz (by simp [hp]),
contrapose! this,
apply degree_sub_lt _ (ne_zero hx),
{ rw [(monic hx).leading_coeff, pmonic.leading_coeff] },
{ exact le_antisymm (min A x pmonic hp)
(pmin (minpoly A x) (monic hx) (aeval A x)) }
end
/-- If an element `x` is a root of a polynomial `p`,
then the minimal polynomial of `x` divides `p`. -/
lemma dvd {p : polynomial A} (hp : polynomial.aeval x p = 0) : minpoly A x ∣ p :=
begin
by_cases hp0 : p = 0,
{ simp only [hp0, dvd_zero] },
have hx : is_integral A x,
{ rw ← is_algebraic_iff_is_integral, exact ⟨p, hp0, hp⟩ },
rw ← dvd_iff_mod_by_monic_eq_zero (monic hx),
by_contra hnz,
have := degree_le_of_ne_zero A x hnz _,
{ contrapose! this,
exact degree_mod_by_monic_lt _ (monic hx) (ne_zero hx) },
{ rw ← mod_by_monic_add_div p (monic hx) at hp,
simpa using hp }
end
lemma dvd_map_of_is_scalar_tower (A K : Type*) {R : Type*} [comm_ring A] [field K] [comm_ring R]
[algebra A K] [algebra A R] [algebra K R] [is_scalar_tower A K R] (x : R) :
minpoly K x ∣ (minpoly A x).map (algebra_map A K) :=
by { refine minpoly.dvd K x _, rw [← is_scalar_tower.aeval_apply, minpoly.aeval] }
variables {A x}
theorem unique' [nontrivial B] {p : polynomial A} (hp1 : _root_.irreducible p)
(hp2 : polynomial.aeval x p = 0) (hp3 : p.monic) : p = minpoly A x :=
let ⟨q, hq⟩ := dvd A x hp2 in
eq_of_monic_of_associated hp3 (monic ⟨p, ⟨hp3, hp2⟩⟩) $
mul_one (minpoly A x) ▸ hq.symm ▸ associated_mul_mul (associated.refl _) $
associated_one_iff_is_unit.2 $ (hp1.is_unit_or_is_unit hq).resolve_left $ not_is_unit A x
lemma unique'' [nontrivial B] {p : polynomial A}
(hp1 : _root_.irreducible p) (hp2 : polynomial.aeval x p = 0) :
p * C p.leading_coeff⁻¹ = minpoly A x :=
begin
have : p.leading_coeff ≠ 0 := leading_coeff_ne_zero.mpr hp1.ne_zero,
apply unique',
{ exact irreducible_of_associated ⟨⟨C p.leading_coeff⁻¹, C p.leading_coeff,
by rwa [←C_mul, inv_mul_cancel, C_1], by rwa [←C_mul, mul_inv_cancel, C_1]⟩, rfl⟩ hp1 },
{ rw [aeval_mul, hp2, zero_mul] },
{ rwa [polynomial.monic, leading_coeff_mul, leading_coeff_C, mul_inv_cancel] },
end
/-- If `y` is the image of `x` in an extension, their minimal polynomials coincide.
We take `h : y = algebra_map L T x` as an argument because `rw h` typically fails
since `is_integral R y` depends on y.
-/
lemma eq_of_algebra_map_eq {K S T : Type*} [field K] [comm_ring S] [comm_ring T]
[algebra K S] [algebra K T] [algebra S T]
[is_scalar_tower K S T] (hST : function.injective (algebra_map S T))
{x : S} {y : T} (hx : is_integral K x) (h : y = algebra_map S T x) :
minpoly K x = minpoly K y :=
minpoly.unique _ _ (minpoly.monic hx)
(by rw [h, ← is_scalar_tower.algebra_map_aeval, minpoly.aeval, ring_hom.map_zero])
(λ q q_monic root_q, minpoly.min _ _ q_monic
(is_scalar_tower.aeval_eq_zero_of_aeval_algebra_map_eq_zero K S T hST
(h ▸ root_q : polynomial.aeval (algebra_map S T x) q = 0)))
section gcd_domain
/-- For GCD domains, the minimal polynomial over the ring is the same as the minimal polynomial
over the fraction field. -/
lemma gcd_domain_eq_field_fractions {A R : Type*} (K : Type*) [integral_domain A]
[gcd_monoid A] [field K] [integral_domain R] [algebra A K] [is_fraction_ring A K]
[algebra K R] [algebra A R] [is_scalar_tower A K R] {x : R} (hx : is_integral A x) :
minpoly K x = (minpoly A x).map (algebra_map A K) :=
begin
symmetry,
refine unique' _ _ _,
{ exact (polynomial.is_primitive.irreducible_iff_irreducible_map_fraction_map
(polynomial.monic.is_primitive (monic hx))).1 (irreducible hx) },
{ have htower := is_scalar_tower.aeval_apply A K R x (minpoly A x),
rwa [aeval, eq_comm] at htower },
{ exact monic_map _ (monic hx) }
end
/-- For GCD domains, the minimal polynomial divides any primitive polynomial that has the integral
element as root. -/
lemma gcd_domain_dvd {A R : Type*} (K : Type*)
[integral_domain A] [gcd_monoid A] [field K] [integral_domain R] [algebra A K]
[is_fraction_ring A K] [algebra K R] [algebra A R] [is_scalar_tower A K R]
{x : R} (hx : is_integral A x)
{P : polynomial A} (hprim : is_primitive P) (hroot : polynomial.aeval x P = 0) :
minpoly A x ∣ P :=
begin
apply (is_primitive.dvd_iff_fraction_map_dvd_fraction_map K
(monic.is_primitive (monic hx)) hprim).2,
rw ← gcd_domain_eq_field_fractions K hx,
refine dvd _ _ _,
rwa ← is_scalar_tower.aeval_apply
end
end gcd_domain
variables (B) [nontrivial B]
/-- If `B/K` is a nontrivial algebra over a field, and `x` is an element of `K`,
then the minimal polynomial of `algebra_map K B x` is `X - C x`. -/
lemma eq_X_sub_C (a : A) : minpoly A (algebra_map A B a) = X - C a :=
eq_X_sub_C_of_algebra_map_inj a (algebra_map A B).injective
lemma eq_X_sub_C' (a : A) : minpoly A a = X - C a := eq_X_sub_C A a
variables (A)
/-- The minimal polynomial of `0` is `X`. -/
@[simp] lemma zero : minpoly A (0:B) = X :=
by simpa only [add_zero, C_0, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_zero, ring_hom.map_zero]
using eq_X_sub_C B (0:A)
/-- The minimal polynomial of `1` is `X - 1`. -/
@[simp] lemma one : minpoly A (1:B) = X - 1 :=
by simpa only [ring_hom.map_one, C_1, sub_eq_add_neg] using eq_X_sub_C B (1:A)
end ring
section domain
variables [domain B] [algebra A B]
variables {x : B}
/-- A minimal polynomial is prime. -/
lemma prime (hx : is_integral A x) : prime (minpoly A x) :=
begin
refine ⟨ne_zero hx, not_is_unit A x, _⟩,
rintros p q ⟨d, h⟩,
have : polynomial.aeval x (p*q) = 0 := by simp [h, aeval A x],
replace : polynomial.aeval x p = 0 ∨ polynomial.aeval x q = 0 := by simpa,
exact or.imp (dvd A x) (dvd A x) this
end
/-- If `L/K` is a field extension and an element `y` of `K` is a root of the minimal polynomial
of an element `x ∈ L`, then `y` maps to `x` under the field embedding. -/
lemma root {x : B} (hx : is_integral A x) {y : A} (h : is_root (minpoly A x) y) :
algebra_map A B y = x :=
have key : minpoly A x = X - C y :=
eq_of_monic_of_associated (monic hx) (monic_X_sub_C y) (associated_of_dvd_dvd
(dvd_symm_of_irreducible (irreducible_X_sub_C y) (irreducible hx) (dvd_iff_is_root.2 h))
(dvd_iff_is_root.2 h)),
by { have := aeval A x, rwa [key, alg_hom.map_sub, aeval_X, aeval_C, sub_eq_zero, eq_comm] at this }
/-- The constant coefficient of the minimal polynomial of `x` is `0` if and only if `x = 0`. -/
@[simp] lemma coeff_zero_eq_zero (hx : is_integral A x) : coeff (minpoly A x) 0 = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
begin
split,
{ intro h,
have zero_root := zero_is_root_of_coeff_zero_eq_zero h,
rw ← root hx zero_root,
exact ring_hom.map_zero _ },
{ rintro rfl, simp }
end
/-- The minimal polynomial of a nonzero element has nonzero constant coefficient. -/
lemma coeff_zero_ne_zero (hx : is_integral A x) (h : x ≠ 0) : coeff (minpoly A x) 0 ≠ 0 :=
by { contrapose! h, simpa only [hx, coeff_zero_eq_zero] using h }
end domain
end field
end minpoly
|
a45db1440bea6166d38ac3328b537cf125542140 | 02005f45e00c7ecf2c8ca5db60251bd1e9c860b5 | /src/data/real/ennreal.lean | b4e1ff1784b767a67a4aadcf3cb944484bdb2d2d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | anthony2698/mathlib | 03cd69fe5c280b0916f6df2d07c614c8e1efe890 | 407615e05814e98b24b2ff322b14e8e3eb5e5d67 | refs/heads/master | 1,678,792,774,873 | 1,614,371,563,000 | 1,614,371,563,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 57,274 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import data.real.nnreal
import data.set.intervals
/-!
# Extended non-negative reals
We define `ennreal = ℝ≥0∞ := with_no ℝ≥0` to be the type of extended nonnegative real numbers,
i.e., the interval `[0, +∞]`. This type is used as the codomain of a `measure_theory.measure`,
and of the extended distance `edist` in a `emetric_space`.
In this file we define some algebraic operations and a linear order on `ℝ≥0∞`
and prove basic properties of these operations, order, and conversions to/from `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0`, and `ℕ`.
## Main definitions
* `ℝ≥0∞`: the extended nonnegative real numbers `[0, ∞]`; defined as `with_top ℝ≥0`; it is
equipped with the following structures:
- coercion from `ℝ≥0` defined in the natural way;
- the natural structure of a complete dense linear order: `↑p ≤ ↑q ↔ p ≤ q` and `∀ a, a ≤ ∞`;
- `a + b` is defined so that `↑p + ↑q = ↑(p + q)` for `(p q : ℝ≥0)` and `a + ∞ = ∞ + a = ∞`;
- `a * b` is defined so that `↑p * ↑q = ↑(p * q)` for `(p q : ℝ≥0)`, `0 * ∞ = ∞ * 0 = 0`, and `a *
∞ = ∞ * a = ∞` for `a ≠ 0`;
- `a - b` is defined as the minimal `d` such that `a ≤ d + b`; this way we have
`↑p - ↑q = ↑(p - q)`, `∞ - ↑p = ∞`, `↑p - ∞ = ∞ - ∞ = 0`; note that there is no negation, only
subtraction;
- `a⁻¹` is defined as `Inf {b | 1 ≤ a * b}`. This way we have `(↑p)⁻¹ = ↑(p⁻¹)` for
`p : ℝ≥0`, `p ≠ 0`, `0⁻¹ = ∞`, and `∞⁻¹ = 0`.
- `a / b` is defined as `a * b⁻¹`.
The addition and multiplication defined this way together with `0 = ↑0` and `1 = ↑1` turn
`ℝ≥0∞` into a canonically ordered commutative semiring of characteristic zero.
* Coercions to/from other types:
- coercion `ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞` is defined as `has_coe`, so one can use `(p : ℝ≥0)` in a context that
expects `a : ℝ≥0∞`, and Lean will apply `coe` automatically;
- `ennreal.to_nnreal` sends `↑p` to `p` and `∞` to `0`;
- `ennreal.to_real := coe ∘ ennreal.to_nnreal` sends `↑p`, `p : ℝ≥0` to `(↑p : ℝ)` and `∞` to `0`;
- `ennreal.of_real := coe ∘ nnreal.of_real` sends `x : ℝ` to `↑⟨max x 0, _⟩`
- `ennreal.ne_top_equiv_nnreal` is an equivalence between `{a : ℝ≥0∞ // a ≠ 0}` and `ℝ≥0`.
## Implementation notes
We define a `can_lift ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0` instance, so one of the ways to prove theorems about an `ℝ≥0∞`
number `a` is to consider the cases `a = ∞` and `a ≠ ∞`, and use the tactic `lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha`
in the second case. This instance is even more useful if one already has `ha : a ≠ ∞` in the
context, or if we have `(f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : ∀ x, f x ≠ ∞)`.
## Notations
* `ℝ≥0∞`: the type of the extended nonnegative real numbers;
* `ℝ≥0`: the type of nonnegative real numbers `[0, ∞)`; defined in `data.real.nnreal`;
* `∞`: a localized notation in `ℝ≥0∞` for `⊤ : ℝ≥0∞`.
-/
noncomputable theory
open classical set
open_locale classical big_operators nnreal
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
/-- The extended nonnegative real numbers. This is usually denoted [0, ∞],
and is relevant as the codomain of a measure. -/
@[derive canonically_ordered_comm_semiring, derive complete_linear_order, derive densely_ordered,
derive nontrivial]
def ennreal := with_top ℝ≥0
localized "notation `ℝ≥0∞` := ennreal" in ennreal
localized "notation `∞` := (⊤ : ennreal)" in ennreal
namespace ennreal
variables {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0}
instance : inhabited ℝ≥0∞ := ⟨0⟩
instance : has_coe ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0∞ := ⟨ option.some ⟩
instance : can_lift ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0 :=
{ coe := coe,
cond := λ r, r ≠ ∞,
prf := λ x hx, ⟨option.get $ option.ne_none_iff_is_some.1 hx, option.some_get _⟩ }
@[simp] lemma none_eq_top : (none : ℝ≥0∞) = ∞ := rfl
@[simp] lemma some_eq_coe (a : ℝ≥0) : (some a : ℝ≥0∞) = (↑a : ℝ≥0∞) := rfl
/-- `to_nnreal x` returns `x` if it is real, otherwise 0. -/
protected def to_nnreal : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0
| (some r) := r
| none := 0
/-- `to_real x` returns `x` if it is real, `0` otherwise. -/
protected def to_real (a : ℝ≥0∞) : real := coe (a.to_nnreal)
/-- `of_real x` returns `x` if it is nonnegative, `0` otherwise. -/
protected def of_real (r : real) : ℝ≥0∞ := coe (nnreal.of_real r)
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma to_nnreal_coe : (r : ℝ≥0∞).to_nnreal = r := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_to_nnreal : ∀{a:ℝ≥0∞}, a ≠ ∞ → ↑(a.to_nnreal) = a
| (some r) h := rfl
| none h := (h rfl).elim
@[simp] lemma of_real_to_real {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a ≠ ∞) : ennreal.of_real (a.to_real) = a :=
by simp [ennreal.to_real, ennreal.of_real, h]
@[simp] lemma to_real_of_real {r : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ r) : ennreal.to_real (ennreal.of_real r) = r :=
by simp [ennreal.to_real, ennreal.of_real, nnreal.coe_of_real _ h]
lemma to_real_of_real' {r : ℝ} : ennreal.to_real (ennreal.of_real r) = max r 0 := rfl
lemma coe_to_nnreal_le_self : ∀{a:ℝ≥0∞}, ↑(a.to_nnreal) ≤ a
| (some r) := by rw [some_eq_coe, to_nnreal_coe]; exact le_refl _
| none := le_top
lemma coe_nnreal_eq (r : ℝ≥0) : (r : ℝ≥0∞) = ennreal.of_real r :=
by { rw [ennreal.of_real, nnreal.of_real], cases r with r h, congr, dsimp, rw max_eq_left h }
lemma of_real_eq_coe_nnreal {x : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) :
ennreal.of_real x = @coe ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0∞ _ (⟨x, h⟩ : ℝ≥0) :=
by { rw [coe_nnreal_eq], refl }
@[simp] lemma of_real_coe_nnreal : ennreal.of_real p = p := (coe_nnreal_eq p).symm
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ≥0) = (0 : ℝ≥0∞) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_one : ↑(1 : ℝ≥0) = (1 : ℝ≥0∞) := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_real_nonneg {a : ℝ≥0∞} : 0 ≤ a.to_real := by simp [ennreal.to_real]
@[simp] lemma top_to_nnreal : ∞.to_nnreal = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma top_to_real : ∞.to_real = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma one_to_real : (1 : ℝ≥0∞).to_real = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma one_to_nnreal : (1 : ℝ≥0∞).to_nnreal = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_to_real (r : ℝ≥0) : (r : ℝ≥0∞).to_real = r := rfl
@[simp] lemma zero_to_nnreal : (0 : ℝ≥0∞).to_nnreal = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma zero_to_real : (0 : ℝ≥0∞).to_real = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma of_real_zero : ennreal.of_real (0 : ℝ) = 0 :=
by simp [ennreal.of_real]; refl
@[simp] lemma of_real_one : ennreal.of_real (1 : ℝ) = (1 : ℝ≥0∞) :=
by simp [ennreal.of_real]
lemma of_real_to_real_le {a : ℝ≥0∞} : ennreal.of_real (a.to_real) ≤ a :=
if ha : a = ∞ then ha.symm ▸ le_top else le_of_eq (of_real_to_real ha)
lemma forall_ennreal {p : ℝ≥0∞ → Prop} : (∀a, p a) ↔ (∀r:ℝ≥0, p r) ∧ p ∞ :=
⟨assume h, ⟨assume r, h _, h _⟩,
assume ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ a, match a with some r := h₁ _ | none := h₂ end⟩
lemma forall_ne_top {p : ℝ≥0∞ → Prop} : (∀ a ≠ ∞, p a) ↔ ∀ r : ℝ≥0, p r :=
option.ball_ne_none
lemma exists_ne_top {p : ℝ≥0∞ → Prop} : (∃ a ≠ ∞, p a) ↔ ∃ r : ℝ≥0, p r :=
option.bex_ne_none
lemma to_nnreal_eq_zero_iff (x : ℝ≥0∞) : x.to_nnreal = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∨ x = ∞ :=
⟨begin
cases x,
{ simp [none_eq_top] },
{ have A : some (0:ℝ≥0) = (0:ℝ≥0∞) := rfl,
simp [ennreal.to_nnreal, A] {contextual := tt} }
end,
by intro h; cases h; simp [h]⟩
lemma to_real_eq_zero_iff (x : ℝ≥0∞) : x.to_real = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∨ x = ∞ :=
by simp [ennreal.to_real, to_nnreal_eq_zero_iff]
@[simp] lemma coe_ne_top : (r : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ ∞ := with_top.coe_ne_top
@[simp] lemma top_ne_coe : ∞ ≠ (r : ℝ≥0∞) := with_top.top_ne_coe
@[simp] lemma of_real_ne_top {r : ℝ} : ennreal.of_real r ≠ ∞ := by simp [ennreal.of_real]
@[simp] lemma of_real_lt_top {r : ℝ} : ennreal.of_real r < ∞ := lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 of_real_ne_top
@[simp] lemma top_ne_of_real {r : ℝ} : ∞ ≠ ennreal.of_real r := by simp [ennreal.of_real]
@[simp] lemma zero_ne_top : 0 ≠ ∞ := coe_ne_top
@[simp] lemma top_ne_zero : ∞ ≠ 0 := top_ne_coe
@[simp] lemma one_ne_top : 1 ≠ ∞ := coe_ne_top
@[simp] lemma top_ne_one : ∞ ≠ 1 := top_ne_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_eq_coe : (↑r : ℝ≥0∞) = ↑q ↔ r = q := with_top.coe_eq_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_le_coe : (↑r : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ ↑q ↔ r ≤ q := with_top.coe_le_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_lt_coe : (↑r : ℝ≥0∞) < ↑q ↔ r < q := with_top.coe_lt_coe
lemma coe_mono : monotone (coe : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) := λ _ _, coe_le_coe.2
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_eq_zero : (↑r : ℝ≥0∞) = 0 ↔ r = 0 := coe_eq_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma zero_eq_coe : 0 = (↑r : ℝ≥0∞) ↔ 0 = r := coe_eq_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_eq_one : (↑r : ℝ≥0∞) = 1 ↔ r = 1 := coe_eq_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma one_eq_coe : 1 = (↑r : ℝ≥0∞) ↔ 1 = r := coe_eq_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_nonneg : 0 ≤ (↑r : ℝ≥0∞) ↔ 0 ≤ r := coe_le_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_pos : 0 < (↑r : ℝ≥0∞) ↔ 0 < r := coe_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_add : ↑(r + p) = (r + p : ℝ≥0∞) := with_top.coe_add
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mul : ↑(r * p) = (r * p : ℝ≥0∞) := with_top.coe_mul
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_bit0 : (↑(bit0 r) : ℝ≥0∞) = bit0 r := coe_add
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_bit1 : (↑(bit1 r) : ℝ≥0∞) = bit1 r := by simp [bit1]
lemma coe_two : ((2:ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞) = 2 := by norm_cast
protected lemma zero_lt_one : 0 < (1 : ℝ≥0∞) :=
canonically_ordered_semiring.zero_lt_one
@[simp] lemma one_lt_two : (1 : ℝ≥0∞) < 2 :=
coe_one ▸ coe_two ▸ by exact_mod_cast (@one_lt_two ℕ _ _)
@[simp] lemma zero_lt_two : (0:ℝ≥0∞) < 2 := lt_trans ennreal.zero_lt_one one_lt_two
lemma two_ne_zero : (2:ℝ≥0∞) ≠ 0 := (ne_of_lt zero_lt_two).symm
lemma two_ne_top : (2:ℝ≥0∞) ≠ ∞ := coe_two ▸ coe_ne_top
/-- The set of numbers in `ℝ≥0∞` that are not equal to `∞` is equivalent to `ℝ≥0`. -/
def ne_top_equiv_nnreal : {a | a ≠ ∞} ≃ ℝ≥0 :=
{ to_fun := λ x, ennreal.to_nnreal x,
inv_fun := λ x, ⟨x, coe_ne_top⟩,
left_inv := λ ⟨x, hx⟩, subtype.eq $ coe_to_nnreal hx,
right_inv := λ x, to_nnreal_coe }
lemma cinfi_ne_top [has_Inf α] (f : ℝ≥0∞ → α) : (⨅ x : {x // x ≠ ∞}, f x) = ⨅ x : ℝ≥0, f x :=
eq.symm $ infi_congr _ ne_top_equiv_nnreal.symm.surjective $ λ x, rfl
lemma infi_ne_top [complete_lattice α] (f : ℝ≥0∞ → α) : (⨅ x ≠ ∞, f x) = ⨅ x : ℝ≥0, f x :=
by rw [infi_subtype', cinfi_ne_top]
lemma csupr_ne_top [has_Sup α] (f : ℝ≥0∞ → α) : (⨆ x : {x // x ≠ ∞}, f x) = ⨆ x : ℝ≥0, f x :=
@cinfi_ne_top (order_dual α) _ _
lemma supr_ne_top [complete_lattice α] (f : ℝ≥0∞ → α) : (⨆ x ≠ ∞, f x) = ⨆ x : ℝ≥0, f x :=
@infi_ne_top (order_dual α) _ _
lemma infi_ennreal {α : Type*} [complete_lattice α] {f : ℝ≥0∞ → α} :
(⨅ n, f n) = (⨅ n : ℝ≥0, f n) ⊓ f ∞ :=
le_antisymm
(le_inf (le_infi $ assume i, infi_le _ _) (infi_le _ _))
(le_infi $ forall_ennreal.2 ⟨assume r, inf_le_left_of_le $ infi_le _ _, inf_le_right⟩)
lemma supr_ennreal {α : Type*} [complete_lattice α] {f : ℝ≥0∞ → α} :
(⨆ n, f n) = (⨆ n : ℝ≥0, f n) ⊔ f ∞ :=
@infi_ennreal (order_dual α) _ _
@[simp] lemma add_top : a + ∞ = ∞ := with_top.add_top
@[simp] lemma top_add : ∞ + a = ∞ := with_top.top_add
/-- Coercion `ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞` as a `ring_hom`. -/
def of_nnreal_hom : ℝ≥0 →+* ℝ≥0∞ :=
⟨coe, coe_one, λ _ _, coe_mul, coe_zero, λ _ _, coe_add⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_of_nnreal_hom : ⇑of_nnreal_hom = coe := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_indicator {α} (s : set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) (a : α) :
((s.indicator f a : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞) = s.indicator (λ x, f x) a :=
(of_nnreal_hom : ℝ≥0 →+ ℝ≥0∞).map_indicator _ _ _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_pow (n : ℕ) : (↑(r^n) : ℝ≥0∞) = r^n :=
of_nnreal_hom.map_pow r n
@[simp] lemma add_eq_top : a + b = ∞ ↔ a = ∞ ∨ b = ∞ := with_top.add_eq_top
@[simp] lemma add_lt_top : a + b < ∞ ↔ a < ∞ ∧ b < ∞ := with_top.add_lt_top
lemma to_nnreal_add {r₁ r₂ : ℝ≥0∞} (h₁ : r₁ < ∞) (h₂ : r₂ < ∞) :
(r₁ + r₂).to_nnreal = r₁.to_nnreal + r₂.to_nnreal :=
begin
rw [← coe_eq_coe, coe_add, coe_to_nnreal, coe_to_nnreal, coe_to_nnreal];
apply @ne_top_of_lt ℝ≥0∞ _ _ ∞,
exact h₂,
exact h₁,
exact add_lt_top.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
end
/- rw has trouble with the generic lt_top_iff_ne_top and bot_lt_iff_ne_bot
(contrary to erw). This is solved with the next lemmas -/
protected lemma lt_top_iff_ne_top : a < ∞ ↔ a ≠ ∞ := lt_top_iff_ne_top
protected lemma bot_lt_iff_ne_bot : 0 < a ↔ a ≠ 0 := bot_lt_iff_ne_bot
lemma not_lt_top {x : ℝ≥0∞} : ¬ x < ∞ ↔ x = ∞ := by rw [lt_top_iff_ne_top, not_not]
lemma add_ne_top : a + b ≠ ∞ ↔ a ≠ ∞ ∧ b ≠ ∞ :=
by simpa only [lt_top_iff_ne_top] using add_lt_top
lemma mul_top : a * ∞ = (if a = 0 then 0 else ∞) :=
begin split_ifs, { simp [h] }, { exact with_top.mul_top h } end
lemma top_mul : ∞ * a = (if a = 0 then 0 else ∞) :=
begin split_ifs, { simp [h] }, { exact with_top.top_mul h } end
@[simp] lemma top_mul_top : ∞ * ∞ = ∞ := with_top.top_mul_top
lemma top_pow {n:ℕ} (h : 0 < n) : ∞^n = ∞ :=
nat.le_induction (pow_one _) (λ m hm hm', by rw [pow_succ, hm', top_mul_top])
_ (nat.succ_le_of_lt h)
lemma mul_eq_top : a * b = ∞ ↔ (a ≠ 0 ∧ b = ∞) ∨ (a = ∞ ∧ b ≠ 0) :=
with_top.mul_eq_top_iff
lemma mul_lt_top : a < ∞ → b < ∞ → a * b < ∞ :=
with_top.mul_lt_top
lemma mul_ne_top : a ≠ ∞ → b ≠ ∞ → a * b ≠ ∞ :=
by simpa only [lt_top_iff_ne_top] using mul_lt_top
lemma ne_top_of_mul_ne_top_left (h : a * b ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ 0) : a ≠ ∞ :=
by { simp [mul_eq_top, hb, not_or_distrib] at h ⊢, exact h.2 }
lemma ne_top_of_mul_ne_top_right (h : a * b ≠ ∞) (ha : a ≠ 0) : b ≠ ∞ :=
ne_top_of_mul_ne_top_left (by rwa [mul_comm]) ha
lemma lt_top_of_mul_lt_top_left (h : a * b < ∞) (hb : b ≠ 0) : a < ∞ :=
by { rw [ennreal.lt_top_iff_ne_top] at h ⊢, exact ne_top_of_mul_ne_top_left h hb }
lemma lt_top_of_mul_lt_top_right (h : a * b < ∞) (ha : a ≠ 0) : b < ∞ :=
lt_top_of_mul_lt_top_left (by rwa [mul_comm]) ha
lemma mul_lt_top_iff {a b : ℝ≥0∞} : a * b < ∞ ↔ (a < ∞ ∧ b < ∞) ∨ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
begin
split,
{ intro h, rw [← or_assoc, or_iff_not_imp_right, or_iff_not_imp_right], intros hb ha,
exact ⟨lt_top_of_mul_lt_top_left h hb, lt_top_of_mul_lt_top_right h ha⟩ },
{ rintro (⟨ha, hb⟩|rfl|rfl); [exact mul_lt_top ha hb, simp, simp] }
end
lemma mul_self_lt_top_iff {a : ℝ≥0∞} : a * a < ⊤ ↔ a < ⊤ :=
by { rw [ennreal.mul_lt_top_iff, and_self, or_self, or_iff_left_iff_imp], rintro rfl, norm_num }
@[simp] lemma mul_pos : 0 < a * b ↔ 0 < a ∧ 0 < b :=
by simp only [pos_iff_ne_zero, ne.def, mul_eq_zero, not_or_distrib]
lemma pow_eq_top : ∀ n:ℕ, a^n=∞ → a=∞
| 0 := by simp
| (n+1) := λ o, (mul_eq_top.1 o).elim (λ h, pow_eq_top n h.2) and.left
lemma pow_ne_top (h : a ≠ ∞) {n:ℕ} : a^n ≠ ∞ :=
mt (pow_eq_top n) h
lemma pow_lt_top : a < ∞ → ∀ n:ℕ, a^n < ∞ :=
by simpa only [lt_top_iff_ne_top] using pow_ne_top
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_finset_sum {s : finset α} {f : α → ℝ≥0} :
↑(∑ a in s, f a) = (∑ a in s, f a : ℝ≥0∞) :=
of_nnreal_hom.map_sum f s
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_finset_prod {s : finset α} {f : α → ℝ≥0} :
↑(∏ a in s, f a) = ((∏ a in s, f a) : ℝ≥0∞) :=
of_nnreal_hom.map_prod f s
section order
@[simp] lemma bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : ℝ≥0∞) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_lt_top : coe r < ∞ := with_top.coe_lt_top r
@[simp] lemma not_top_le_coe : ¬ ∞ ≤ ↑r := with_top.not_top_le_coe r
lemma zero_lt_coe_iff : 0 < (↑p : ℝ≥0∞) ↔ 0 < p := coe_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma one_le_coe_iff : (1:ℝ≥0∞) ≤ ↑r ↔ 1 ≤ r := coe_le_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_le_one_iff : ↑r ≤ (1:ℝ≥0∞) ↔ r ≤ 1 := coe_le_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_lt_one_iff : (↑p : ℝ≥0∞) < 1 ↔ p < 1 := coe_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma one_lt_coe_iff : 1 < (↑p : ℝ≥0∞) ↔ 1 < p := coe_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_nat (n : ℕ) : ((n : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞) = n := with_top.coe_nat n
@[simp] lemma of_real_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : ennreal.of_real n = n := by simp [ennreal.of_real]
@[simp] lemma nat_ne_top (n : ℕ) : (n : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ ∞ := with_top.nat_ne_top n
@[simp] lemma top_ne_nat (n : ℕ) : ∞ ≠ n := with_top.top_ne_nat n
@[simp] lemma one_lt_top : 1 < ∞ := coe_lt_top
lemma le_coe_iff : a ≤ ↑r ↔ (∃p:ℝ≥0, a = p ∧ p ≤ r) := with_top.le_coe_iff
lemma coe_le_iff : ↑r ≤ a ↔ (∀p:ℝ≥0, a = p → r ≤ p) := with_top.coe_le_iff
lemma lt_iff_exists_coe : a < b ↔ (∃p:ℝ≥0, a = p ∧ ↑p < b) := with_top.lt_iff_exists_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_finset_sup {s : finset α} {f : α → ℝ≥0} :
↑(s.sup f) = s.sup (λ x, (f x : ℝ≥0∞)) :=
finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp_of_is_total _ coe_mono rfl
lemma pow_le_pow {n m : ℕ} (ha : 1 ≤ a) (h : n ≤ m) : a ^ n ≤ a ^ m :=
begin
cases a,
{ cases m,
{ rw eq_bot_iff.mpr h,
exact le_refl _ },
{ rw [none_eq_top, top_pow (nat.succ_pos m)],
exact le_top } },
{ rw [some_eq_coe, ← coe_pow, ← coe_pow, coe_le_coe],
exact pow_le_pow (by simpa using ha) h }
end
@[simp] lemma max_eq_zero_iff : max a b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
by simp only [nonpos_iff_eq_zero.symm, max_le_iff]
@[simp] lemma max_zero_left : max 0 a = a := max_eq_right (zero_le a)
@[simp] lemma max_zero_right : max a 0 = a := max_eq_left (zero_le a)
-- TODO: why this is not a `rfl`? There is some hidden diamond here.
@[simp] lemma sup_eq_max : a ⊔ b = max a b :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ c, sup_le_iff.trans max_le_iff.symm
protected lemma pow_pos : 0 < a → ∀ n : ℕ, 0 < a^n :=
canonically_ordered_semiring.pow_pos
protected lemma pow_ne_zero : a ≠ 0 → ∀ n : ℕ, a^n ≠ 0 :=
by simpa only [pos_iff_ne_zero] using ennreal.pow_pos
@[simp] lemma not_lt_zero : ¬ a < 0 := by simp
lemma add_lt_add_iff_left : a < ∞ → (a + c < a + b ↔ c < b) :=
with_top.add_lt_add_iff_left
lemma add_lt_add_iff_right : a < ∞ → (c + a < b + a ↔ c < b) :=
with_top.add_lt_add_iff_right
lemma lt_add_right (ha : a < ∞) (hb : 0 < b) : a < a + b :=
by rwa [← add_lt_add_iff_left ha, add_zero] at hb
lemma le_of_forall_pos_le_add : ∀{a b : ℝ≥0∞}, (∀ε:ℝ≥0, 0 < ε → b < ∞ → a ≤ b + ε) → a ≤ b
| a none h := le_top
| none (some a) h :=
have ∞ ≤ ↑a + ↑(1:ℝ≥0), from h 1 zero_lt_one coe_lt_top,
by rw [← coe_add] at this; exact (not_top_le_coe this).elim
| (some a) (some b) h :=
by simp only [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, coe_add.symm, coe_le_coe, coe_lt_top, true_implies_iff]
at *; exact nnreal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add h
lemma lt_iff_exists_rat_btwn :
a < b ↔ (∃q:ℚ, 0 ≤ q ∧ a < nnreal.of_real q ∧ (nnreal.of_real q:ℝ≥0∞) < b) :=
⟨λ h,
begin
rcases lt_iff_exists_coe.1 h with ⟨p, rfl, _⟩,
rcases exists_between h with ⟨c, pc, cb⟩,
rcases lt_iff_exists_coe.1 cb with ⟨r, rfl, _⟩,
rcases (nnreal.lt_iff_exists_rat_btwn _ _).1 (coe_lt_coe.1 pc) with ⟨q, hq0, pq, qr⟩,
exact ⟨q, hq0, coe_lt_coe.2 pq, lt_trans (coe_lt_coe.2 qr) cb⟩
end,
λ ⟨q, q0, qa, qb⟩, lt_trans qa qb⟩
lemma lt_iff_exists_real_btwn :
a < b ↔ (∃r:ℝ, 0 ≤ r ∧ a < ennreal.of_real r ∧ (ennreal.of_real r:ℝ≥0∞) < b) :=
⟨λ h, let ⟨q, q0, aq, qb⟩ := ennreal.lt_iff_exists_rat_btwn.1 h in
⟨q, rat.cast_nonneg.2 q0, aq, qb⟩,
λ ⟨q, q0, qa, qb⟩, lt_trans qa qb⟩
lemma lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn :
a < b ↔ (∃r:ℝ≥0, a < r ∧ (r : ℝ≥0∞) < b) :=
with_top.lt_iff_exists_coe_btwn
lemma lt_iff_exists_add_pos_lt : a < b ↔ (∃ r : ℝ≥0, 0 < r ∧ a + r < b) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ hab, _, λ ⟨r, rpos, hr⟩, lt_of_le_of_lt (le_add_right (le_refl _)) hr⟩,
cases a, { simpa using hab },
rcases lt_iff_exists_real_btwn.1 hab with ⟨c, c_nonneg, ac, cb⟩,
let d : ℝ≥0 := ⟨c, c_nonneg⟩,
have ad : a < d,
{ rw of_real_eq_coe_nnreal c_nonneg at ac,
exact coe_lt_coe.1 ac },
refine ⟨d-a, nnreal.sub_pos.2 ad, _⟩,
rw [some_eq_coe, ← coe_add],
convert cb,
have : nnreal.of_real c = d,
by { rw [← nnreal.coe_eq, nnreal.coe_of_real _ c_nonneg], refl },
rw [add_comm, this],
exact nnreal.sub_add_cancel_of_le (le_of_lt ad)
end
lemma coe_nat_lt_coe {n : ℕ} : (n : ℝ≥0∞) < r ↔ ↑n < r := ennreal.coe_nat n ▸ coe_lt_coe
lemma coe_lt_coe_nat {n : ℕ} : (r : ℝ≥0∞) < n ↔ r < n := ennreal.coe_nat n ▸ coe_lt_coe
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_nat_lt_coe_nat {m n : ℕ} : (m : ℝ≥0∞) < n ↔ m < n :=
ennreal.coe_nat n ▸ coe_nat_lt_coe.trans nat.cast_lt
lemma coe_nat_ne_top {n : ℕ} : (n : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ ∞ := ennreal.coe_nat n ▸ coe_ne_top
lemma coe_nat_mono : strict_mono (coe : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) := λ _ _, coe_nat_lt_coe_nat.2
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_nat_le_coe_nat {m n : ℕ} : (m : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n :=
coe_nat_mono.le_iff_le
instance : char_zero ℝ≥0∞ := ⟨coe_nat_mono.injective⟩
protected lemma exists_nat_gt {r : ℝ≥0∞} (h : r ≠ ∞) : ∃n:ℕ, r < n :=
begin
lift r to ℝ≥0 using h,
rcases exists_nat_gt r with ⟨n, hn⟩,
exact ⟨n, coe_lt_coe_nat.2 hn⟩,
end
lemma add_lt_add (ac : a < c) (bd : b < d) : a + b < c + d :=
begin
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ne_top_of_lt ac,
lift b to ℝ≥0 using ne_top_of_lt bd,
cases c, { simp }, cases d, { simp },
simp only [← coe_add, some_eq_coe, coe_lt_coe] at *,
exact add_lt_add ac bd
end
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_min : ((min r p:ℝ≥0):ℝ≥0∞) = min r p :=
coe_mono.map_min
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_max : ((max r p:ℝ≥0):ℝ≥0∞) = max r p :=
coe_mono.map_max
lemma le_of_top_imp_top_of_to_nnreal_le {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a = ⊤ → b = ⊤)
(h_nnreal : a ≠ ⊤ → b ≠ ⊤ → a.to_nnreal ≤ b.to_nnreal) :
a ≤ b :=
begin
by_cases ha : a = ⊤,
{ rw h ha,
exact le_top, },
by_cases hb : b = ⊤,
{ rw hb,
exact le_top, },
rw [←coe_to_nnreal hb, ←coe_to_nnreal ha, coe_le_coe],
exact h_nnreal ha hb,
end
end order
section complete_lattice
lemma coe_Sup {s : set ℝ≥0} : bdd_above s → (↑(Sup s) : ℝ≥0∞) = (⨆a∈s, ↑a) := with_top.coe_Sup
lemma coe_Inf {s : set ℝ≥0} : s.nonempty → (↑(Inf s) : ℝ≥0∞) = (⨅a∈s, ↑a) := with_top.coe_Inf
@[simp] lemma top_mem_upper_bounds {s : set ℝ≥0∞} : ∞ ∈ upper_bounds s :=
assume x hx, le_top
lemma coe_mem_upper_bounds {s : set ℝ≥0} :
↑r ∈ upper_bounds ((coe : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) '' s) ↔ r ∈ upper_bounds s :=
by simp [upper_bounds, ball_image_iff, -mem_image, *] {contextual := tt}
end complete_lattice
section mul
@[mono] lemma mul_le_mul : a ≤ b → c ≤ d → a * c ≤ b * d :=
canonically_ordered_semiring.mul_le_mul
@[mono] lemma mul_lt_mul (ac : a < c) (bd : b < d) : a * b < c * d :=
begin
rcases lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 ac with ⟨a', aa', a'c⟩,
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ne_top_of_lt aa',
rcases lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 bd with ⟨b', bb', b'd⟩,
lift b to ℝ≥0 using ne_top_of_lt bb',
norm_cast at *,
calc ↑(a * b) < ↑(a' * b') :
coe_lt_coe.2 (mul_lt_mul' aa'.le bb' (zero_le _) ((zero_le a).trans_lt aa'))
... = ↑a' * ↑b' : coe_mul
... ≤ c * d : mul_le_mul a'c.le b'd.le
end
lemma mul_left_mono : monotone ((*) a) := λ b c, mul_le_mul (le_refl a)
lemma mul_right_mono : monotone (λ x, x * a) := λ b c h, mul_le_mul h (le_refl a)
lemma max_mul : max a b * c = max (a * c) (b * c) :=
mul_right_mono.map_max
lemma mul_max : a * max b c = max (a * b) (a * c) :=
mul_left_mono.map_max
lemma mul_eq_mul_left : a ≠ 0 → a ≠ ∞ → (a * b = a * c ↔ b = c) :=
begin
cases a; cases b; cases c;
simp [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, mul_top, top_mul, -coe_mul, coe_mul.symm,
nnreal.mul_eq_mul_left] {contextual := tt},
end
lemma mul_eq_mul_right : c ≠ 0 → c ≠ ∞ → (a * c = b * c ↔ a = b) :=
mul_comm c a ▸ mul_comm c b ▸ mul_eq_mul_left
lemma mul_le_mul_left : a ≠ 0 → a ≠ ∞ → (a * b ≤ a * c ↔ b ≤ c) :=
begin
cases a; cases b; cases c;
simp [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, mul_top, top_mul, -coe_mul, coe_mul.symm] {contextual := tt},
assume h, exact mul_le_mul_left (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h)
end
lemma mul_le_mul_right : c ≠ 0 → c ≠ ∞ → (a * c ≤ b * c ↔ a ≤ b) :=
mul_comm c a ▸ mul_comm c b ▸ mul_le_mul_left
lemma mul_lt_mul_left : a ≠ 0 → a ≠ ∞ → (a * b < a * c ↔ b < c) :=
λ h0 ht, by simp only [mul_le_mul_left h0 ht, lt_iff_le_not_le]
lemma mul_lt_mul_right : c ≠ 0 → c ≠ ∞ → (a * c < b * c ↔ a < b) :=
mul_comm c a ▸ mul_comm c b ▸ mul_lt_mul_left
end mul
section sub
instance : has_sub ℝ≥0∞ := ⟨λa b, Inf {d | a ≤ d + b}⟩
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_sub : ↑(p - r) = (↑p:ℝ≥0∞) - r :=
le_antisymm
(le_Inf $ assume b (hb : ↑p ≤ b + r), coe_le_iff.2 $
by rintros d rfl; rwa [← coe_add, coe_le_coe, ← nnreal.sub_le_iff_le_add] at hb)
(Inf_le $ show (↑p : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ ↑(p - r) + ↑r,
by rw [← coe_add, coe_le_coe, ← nnreal.sub_le_iff_le_add])
@[simp] lemma top_sub_coe : ∞ - ↑r = ∞ :=
top_unique $ le_Inf $ by simp [add_eq_top]
@[simp] lemma sub_eq_zero_of_le (h : a ≤ b) : a - b = 0 :=
le_antisymm (Inf_le $ le_add_left h) (zero_le _)
@[simp] lemma sub_self : a - a = 0 := sub_eq_zero_of_le $ le_refl _
@[simp] lemma zero_sub : 0 - a = 0 :=
le_antisymm (Inf_le $ zero_le $ 0 + a) (zero_le _)
@[simp] lemma sub_infty : a - ∞ = 0 :=
le_antisymm (Inf_le $ by simp) (zero_le _)
lemma sub_le_sub (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : d ≤ c) : a - c ≤ b - d :=
Inf_le_Inf $ assume e (h : b ≤ e + d),
calc a ≤ b : h₁
... ≤ e + d : h
... ≤ e + c : add_le_add (le_refl _) h₂
@[simp] lemma add_sub_self : ∀{a b : ℝ≥0∞}, b < ∞ → (a + b) - b = a
| a none := by simp [none_eq_top]
| none (some b) := by simp [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe]
| (some a) (some b) :=
by simp [some_eq_coe]; rw [← coe_add, ← coe_sub, coe_eq_coe, nnreal.add_sub_cancel]
@[simp] lemma add_sub_self' (h : a < ∞) : (a + b) - a = b :=
by rw [add_comm, add_sub_self h]
lemma add_right_inj (h : a < ∞) : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c :=
⟨λ e, by simpa [h] using congr_arg (λ x, x - a) e, congr_arg _⟩
lemma add_left_inj (h : a < ∞) : b + a = c + a ↔ b = c :=
by rw [add_comm, add_comm c, add_right_inj h]
@[simp] lemma sub_add_cancel_of_le : ∀{a b : ℝ≥0∞}, b ≤ a → (a - b) + b = a :=
begin
simp [forall_ennreal, le_coe_iff, -add_comm] {contextual := tt},
rintros r p x rfl h,
rw [← coe_sub, ← coe_add, nnreal.sub_add_cancel_of_le h]
end
@[simp] lemma add_sub_cancel_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : b + (a - b) = a :=
by rwa [add_comm, sub_add_cancel_of_le]
lemma sub_add_self_eq_max : (a - b) + b = max a b :=
match le_total a b with
| or.inl h := by simp [h, max_eq_right]
| or.inr h := by simp [h, max_eq_left]
end
lemma le_sub_add_self : a ≤ (a - b) + b :=
by { rw sub_add_self_eq_max, exact le_max_left a b }
@[simp] protected lemma sub_le_iff_le_add : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c + b :=
iff.intro
(assume h : a - b ≤ c,
calc a ≤ (a - b) + b : le_sub_add_self
... ≤ c + b : add_le_add_right h _)
(assume h : a ≤ c + b, Inf_le h)
protected lemma sub_le_iff_le_add' : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b + c :=
add_comm c b ▸ ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add
lemma sub_eq_of_add_eq : b ≠ ∞ → a + b = c → c - b = a :=
λ hb hc, hc ▸ add_sub_self (lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 hb)
protected lemma sub_le_of_sub_le (h : a - b ≤ c) : a - c ≤ b :=
ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add.2 $ by { rw add_comm, exact ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add.1 h }
protected lemma sub_lt_self : a ≠ ∞ → a ≠ 0 → 0 < b → a - b < a :=
match a, b with
| none, _ := by { have := none_eq_top, assume h, contradiction }
| (some a), none := by {intros, simp only [none_eq_top, sub_infty, pos_iff_ne_zero], assumption}
| (some a), (some b) :=
begin
simp only [some_eq_coe, coe_sub.symm, coe_pos, coe_eq_zero, coe_lt_coe, ne.def],
assume h₁ h₂, apply nnreal.sub_lt_self, exact pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h₂
end
end
@[simp] lemma sub_eq_zero_iff_le : a - b = 0 ↔ a ≤ b :=
by simpa [-ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add] using @ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add a b 0
@[simp] lemma zero_lt_sub_iff_lt : 0 < a - b ↔ b < a :=
by simpa [ennreal.bot_lt_iff_ne_bot, -sub_eq_zero_iff_le]
using not_iff_not.2 (@sub_eq_zero_iff_le a b)
lemma lt_sub_iff_add_lt : a < b - c ↔ a + c < b :=
begin
cases a, { simp },
cases c, { simp },
cases b, { simp only [true_iff, coe_lt_top, some_eq_coe, top_sub_coe, none_eq_top, ← coe_add] },
simp only [some_eq_coe],
rw [← coe_add, ← coe_sub, coe_lt_coe, coe_lt_coe, nnreal.lt_sub_iff_add_lt],
end
lemma sub_le_self (a b : ℝ≥0∞) : a - b ≤ a :=
ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add.2 $ le_add_right (le_refl a)
@[simp] lemma sub_zero : a - 0 = a :=
eq.trans (add_zero (a - 0)).symm $ by simp
/-- A version of triangle inequality for difference as a "distance". -/
lemma sub_le_sub_add_sub : a - c ≤ a - b + (b - c) :=
ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add.2 $
calc a ≤ a - b + b : le_sub_add_self
... ≤ a - b + ((b - c) + c) : add_le_add_left le_sub_add_self _
... = a - b + (b - c) + c : (add_assoc _ _ _).symm
lemma sub_sub_cancel (h : a < ∞) (h2 : b ≤ a) : a - (a - b) = b :=
by rw [← add_left_inj (lt_of_le_of_lt (sub_le_self _ _) h),
sub_add_cancel_of_le (sub_le_self _ _), add_sub_cancel_of_le h2]
lemma sub_right_inj {a b c : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a < ∞) (hb : b ≤ a) (hc : c ≤ a) :
a - b = a - c ↔ b = c :=
iff.intro
begin
assume h, have : a - (a - b) = a - (a - c), rw h,
rw [sub_sub_cancel ha hb, sub_sub_cancel ha hc] at this, exact this
end
(λ h, by rw h)
lemma sub_mul (h : 0 < b → b < a → c ≠ ∞) : (a - b) * c = a * c - b * c :=
begin
cases le_or_lt a b with hab hab,
{ simp [hab, mul_right_mono hab] },
symmetry,
cases eq_or_lt_of_le (zero_le b) with hb hb,
{ subst b, simp },
apply sub_eq_of_add_eq,
{ exact mul_ne_top (ne_top_of_lt hab) (h hb hab) },
rw [← add_mul, sub_add_cancel_of_le (le_of_lt hab)]
end
lemma mul_sub (h : 0 < c → c < b → a ≠ ∞) :
a * (b - c) = a * b - a * c :=
by { simp only [mul_comm a], exact sub_mul h }
lemma sub_mul_ge : a * c - b * c ≤ (a - b) * c :=
begin
-- with `0 < b → b < a → c ≠ ∞` Lean names the first variable `a`
by_cases h : ∀ (hb : 0 < b), b < a → c ≠ ∞,
{ rw [sub_mul h],
exact le_refl _ },
{ push_neg at h,
rcases h with ⟨hb, hba, hc⟩,
subst c,
simp only [mul_top, if_neg (ne_of_gt hb), if_neg (ne_of_gt $ lt_trans hb hba), sub_self,
zero_le] }
end
end sub
section sum
open finset
/-- A product of finite numbers is still finite -/
lemma prod_lt_top {s : finset α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀a∈s, f a < ∞) : (∏ a in s, f a) < ∞ :=
with_top.prod_lt_top h
/-- A sum of finite numbers is still finite -/
lemma sum_lt_top {s : finset α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} :
(∀a∈s, f a < ∞) → ∑ a in s, f a < ∞ :=
with_top.sum_lt_top
/-- A sum of finite numbers is still finite -/
lemma sum_lt_top_iff {s : finset α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} :
∑ a in s, f a < ∞ ↔ (∀a∈s, f a < ∞) :=
with_top.sum_lt_top_iff
/-- A sum of numbers is infinite iff one of them is infinite -/
lemma sum_eq_top_iff {s : finset α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} :
(∑ x in s, f x) = ∞ ↔ (∃a∈s, f a = ∞) :=
with_top.sum_eq_top_iff
/-- seeing `ℝ≥0∞` as `ℝ≥0` does not change their sum, unless one of the `ℝ≥0∞` is
infinity -/
lemma to_nnreal_sum {s : finset α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀a∈s, f a < ∞) :
ennreal.to_nnreal (∑ a in s, f a) = ∑ a in s, ennreal.to_nnreal (f a) :=
begin
rw [← coe_eq_coe, coe_to_nnreal, coe_finset_sum, sum_congr],
{ refl },
{ intros x hx, exact (coe_to_nnreal (hf x hx).ne).symm },
{ exact (sum_lt_top hf).ne }
end
/-- seeing `ℝ≥0∞` as `real` does not change their sum, unless one of the `ℝ≥0∞` is infinity -/
lemma to_real_sum {s : finset α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀a∈s, f a < ∞) :
ennreal.to_real (∑ a in s, f a) = ∑ a in s, ennreal.to_real (f a) :=
by { rw [ennreal.to_real, to_nnreal_sum hf, nnreal.coe_sum], refl }
lemma of_real_sum_of_nonneg {s : finset α} {f : α → ℝ} (hf : ∀ i, i ∈ s → 0 ≤ f i) :
ennreal.of_real (∑ i in s, f i) = ∑ i in s, ennreal.of_real (f i) :=
begin
simp_rw [ennreal.of_real, ←coe_finset_sum, coe_eq_coe],
exact nnreal.of_real_sum_of_nonneg hf,
end
end sum
section interval
variables {x y z : ℝ≥0∞} {ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ≥0∞} {s : set ℝ≥0∞}
protected lemma Ico_eq_Iio : (Ico 0 y) = (Iio y) :=
ext $ assume a, iff.intro
(assume ⟨_, hx⟩, hx)
(assume hx, ⟨zero_le _, hx⟩)
lemma mem_Iio_self_add : x ≠ ∞ → 0 < ε → x ∈ Iio (x + ε) :=
assume xt ε0, lt_add_right (by rwa lt_top_iff_ne_top) ε0
lemma not_mem_Ioo_self_sub : x = 0 → x ∉ Ioo (x - ε) y :=
assume x0, by simp [x0]
lemma mem_Ioo_self_sub_add : x ≠ ∞ → x ≠ 0 → 0 < ε₁ → 0 < ε₂ → x ∈ Ioo (x - ε₁) (x + ε₂) :=
assume xt x0 ε0 ε0',
⟨ennreal.sub_lt_self xt x0 ε0, lt_add_right (by rwa [lt_top_iff_ne_top]) ε0'⟩
end interval
section bit
@[simp] lemma bit0_inj : bit0 a = bit0 b ↔ a = b :=
⟨λh, begin
rcases (lt_trichotomy a b) with h₁| h₂| h₃,
{ exact (absurd h (ne_of_lt (add_lt_add h₁ h₁))) },
{ exact h₂ },
{ exact (absurd h.symm (ne_of_lt (add_lt_add h₃ h₃))) }
end,
λh, congr_arg _ h⟩
@[simp] lemma bit0_eq_zero_iff : bit0 a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
by simpa only [bit0_zero] using @bit0_inj a 0
@[simp] lemma bit0_eq_top_iff : bit0 a = ∞ ↔ a = ∞ :=
by rw [bit0, add_eq_top, or_self]
@[simp] lemma bit1_inj : bit1 a = bit1 b ↔ a = b :=
⟨λh, begin
unfold bit1 at h,
rwa [add_left_inj, bit0_inj] at h,
simp [lt_top_iff_ne_top]
end,
λh, congr_arg _ h⟩
@[simp] lemma bit1_ne_zero : bit1 a ≠ 0 :=
by unfold bit1; simp
@[simp] lemma bit1_eq_one_iff : bit1 a = 1 ↔ a = 0 :=
by simpa only [bit1_zero] using @bit1_inj a 0
@[simp] lemma bit1_eq_top_iff : bit1 a = ∞ ↔ a = ∞ :=
by unfold bit1; rw add_eq_top; simp
end bit
section inv
instance : has_inv ℝ≥0∞ := ⟨λa, Inf {b | 1 ≤ a * b}⟩
instance : div_inv_monoid ℝ≥0∞ :=
{ inv := has_inv.inv,
.. (infer_instance : monoid ℝ≥0∞) }
@[simp] lemma inv_zero : (0 : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ = ∞ :=
show Inf {b : ℝ≥0∞ | 1 ≤ 0 * b} = ∞, by simp; refl
@[simp] lemma inv_top : ∞⁻¹ = 0 :=
bot_unique $ le_of_forall_le_of_dense $ λ a (h : a > 0), Inf_le $ by simp [*, ne_of_gt h, top_mul]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_inv (hr : r ≠ 0) : (↑r⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) = (↑r)⁻¹ :=
le_antisymm
(le_Inf $ assume b (hb : 1 ≤ ↑r * b), coe_le_iff.2 $
by rintros b rfl; rwa [← coe_mul, ← coe_one, coe_le_coe, ← nnreal.inv_le hr] at hb)
(Inf_le $ by simp; rw [← coe_mul, mul_inv_cancel hr]; exact le_refl 1)
lemma coe_inv_le : (↑r⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ (↑r)⁻¹ :=
if hr : r = 0 then by simp only [hr, inv_zero, coe_zero, le_top]
else by simp only [coe_inv hr, le_refl]
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_inv_two : ((2⁻¹:ℝ≥0):ℝ≥0∞) = 2⁻¹ :=
by rw [coe_inv (ne_of_gt _root_.zero_lt_two), coe_two]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_div (hr : r ≠ 0) : (↑(p / r) : ℝ≥0∞) = p / r :=
by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, coe_mul, coe_inv hr]
@[simp] lemma inv_one : (1:ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ = 1 :=
by simpa only [coe_inv one_ne_zero, coe_one] using coe_eq_coe.2 inv_one
@[simp] lemma div_one {a : ℝ≥0∞} : a / 1 = a :=
by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_one, mul_one]
protected lemma inv_pow {n : ℕ} : (a^n)⁻¹ = (a⁻¹)^n :=
begin
by_cases a = 0; cases a; cases n; simp [*, none_eq_top, some_eq_coe,
zero_pow, top_pow, nat.zero_lt_succ] at *,
rw [← coe_inv h, ← coe_pow, ← coe_inv (pow_ne_zero _ h), ← inv_pow', coe_pow]
end
@[simp] lemma inv_inv : (a⁻¹)⁻¹ = a :=
by by_cases a = 0; cases a; simp [*, none_eq_top, some_eq_coe,
-coe_inv, (coe_inv _).symm] at *
lemma inv_involutive : function.involutive (λ a:ℝ≥0∞, a⁻¹) :=
λ a, ennreal.inv_inv
lemma inv_bijective : function.bijective (λ a:ℝ≥0∞, a⁻¹) :=
ennreal.inv_involutive.bijective
@[simp] lemma inv_eq_inv : a⁻¹ = b⁻¹ ↔ a = b := inv_bijective.1.eq_iff
@[simp] lemma inv_eq_top : a⁻¹ = ∞ ↔ a = 0 :=
inv_zero ▸ inv_eq_inv
lemma inv_ne_top : a⁻¹ ≠ ∞ ↔ a ≠ 0 := by simp
@[simp] lemma inv_lt_top {x : ℝ≥0∞} : x⁻¹ < ∞ ↔ 0 < x :=
by { simp only [lt_top_iff_ne_top, inv_ne_top, pos_iff_ne_zero] }
lemma div_lt_top {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (h1 : x < ∞) (h2 : 0 < y) : x / y < ∞ :=
mul_lt_top h1 (inv_lt_top.mpr h2)
@[simp] lemma inv_eq_zero : a⁻¹ = 0 ↔ a = ∞ :=
inv_top ▸ inv_eq_inv
lemma inv_ne_zero : a⁻¹ ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ ∞ := by simp
@[simp] lemma inv_pos : 0 < a⁻¹ ↔ a ≠ ∞ :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans inv_ne_zero
@[simp] lemma inv_lt_inv : a⁻¹ < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a :=
begin
cases a; cases b; simp only [some_eq_coe, none_eq_top, inv_top],
{ simp only [lt_irrefl] },
{ exact inv_pos.trans lt_top_iff_ne_top.symm },
{ simp only [not_lt_zero, not_top_lt] },
{ cases eq_or_lt_of_le (zero_le a) with ha ha;
cases eq_or_lt_of_le (zero_le b) with hb hb,
{ subst a, subst b, simp },
{ subst a, simp },
{ subst b, simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, lt_top_iff_ne_top, inv_ne_top] },
{ rw [← coe_inv (ne_of_gt ha), ← coe_inv (ne_of_gt hb), coe_lt_coe, coe_lt_coe],
simp only [nnreal.coe_lt_coe.symm] at *,
exact inv_lt_inv ha hb } }
end
lemma inv_lt_iff_inv_lt : a⁻¹ < b ↔ b⁻¹ < a :=
by simpa only [inv_inv] using @inv_lt_inv a b⁻¹
lemma lt_inv_iff_lt_inv : a < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a⁻¹ :=
by simpa only [inv_inv] using @inv_lt_inv a⁻¹ b
@[simp, priority 1100] -- higher than le_inv_iff_mul_le
lemma inv_le_inv : a⁻¹ ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a :=
by simp only [le_iff_lt_or_eq, inv_lt_inv, inv_eq_inv, eq_comm]
lemma inv_le_iff_inv_le : a⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ b⁻¹ ≤ a :=
by simpa only [inv_inv] using @inv_le_inv a b⁻¹
lemma le_inv_iff_le_inv : a ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a⁻¹ :=
by simpa only [inv_inv] using @inv_le_inv a⁻¹ b
@[simp] lemma inv_lt_one : a⁻¹ < 1 ↔ 1 < a :=
inv_lt_iff_inv_lt.trans $ by rw [inv_one]
@[simp] lemma div_top : a / ∞ = 0 := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_top, mul_zero]
@[simp] lemma top_div_coe : ∞ / p = ∞ := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv, top_mul]
lemma top_div_of_ne_top (h : a ≠ ∞) : ∞ / a = ∞ :=
by { lift a to ℝ≥0 using h, exact top_div_coe }
lemma top_div_of_lt_top (h : a < ∞) : ∞ / a = ∞ :=
top_div_of_ne_top h.ne
lemma top_div : ∞ / a = if a = ∞ then 0 else ∞ :=
by by_cases a = ∞; simp [top_div_of_ne_top, *]
@[simp] lemma zero_div : 0 / a = 0 := zero_mul a⁻¹
lemma div_eq_top : a / b = ∞ ↔ (a ≠ 0 ∧ b = 0) ∨ (a = ∞ ∧ b ≠ ∞) :=
by simp [div_eq_mul_inv, ennreal.mul_eq_top]
lemma le_div_iff_mul_le (h0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ 0) (ht : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ ∞) :
a ≤ c / b ↔ a * b ≤ c :=
begin
cases b,
{ simp at ht,
split,
{ assume ha, simp at ha, simp [ha] },
{ contrapose,
assume ha,
simp at ha,
have : a * ∞ = ∞, by simp [ennreal.mul_eq_top, ha],
simp [this, ht] } },
by_cases hb : b ≠ 0,
{ have : (b : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ 0, by simp [hb],
rw [← ennreal.mul_le_mul_left this coe_ne_top],
suffices : ↑b * a ≤ (↑b * ↑b⁻¹) * c ↔ a * ↑b ≤ c,
{ simpa [some_eq_coe, div_eq_mul_inv, hb, mul_left_comm, mul_comm, mul_assoc] },
rw [← coe_mul, mul_inv_cancel hb, coe_one, one_mul, mul_comm] },
{ simp at hb,
simp [hb] at h0,
have : c / 0 = ∞, by simp [div_eq_top, h0],
simp [hb, this] }
end
lemma div_le_iff_le_mul (hb0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ ∞) (hbt : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ 0) : a / b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c * b :=
begin
suffices : a * b⁻¹ ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c / b⁻¹, by simpa [div_eq_mul_inv],
refine (le_div_iff_mul_le _ _).symm; simpa
end
lemma div_le_of_le_mul (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / c ≤ b :=
begin
by_cases h0 : c = 0,
{ have : a = 0, by simpa [h0] using h, simp [*] },
by_cases hinf : c = ∞, by simp [hinf],
exact (div_le_iff_le_mul (or.inl h0) (or.inl hinf)).2 h
end
protected lemma div_lt_iff (h0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ 0) (ht : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ ∞) :
c / b < a ↔ c < a * b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le $ le_div_iff_mul_le h0 ht
lemma mul_lt_of_lt_div (h : a < b / c) : a * c < b :=
by { contrapose! h, exact ennreal.div_le_of_le_mul h }
lemma inv_le_iff_le_mul : (b = ∞ → a ≠ 0) → (a = ∞ → b ≠ 0) → (a⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ 1 ≤ a * b) :=
begin
cases a; cases b; simp [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, mul_top, top_mul] {contextual := tt},
by_cases a = 0; simp [*, -coe_mul, coe_mul.symm, -coe_inv, (coe_inv _).symm, nnreal.inv_le]
end
@[simp] lemma le_inv_iff_mul_le : a ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ a * b ≤ 1 :=
begin
cases b, { by_cases a = 0; simp [*, none_eq_top, mul_top] },
by_cases b = 0; simp [*, some_eq_coe, le_div_iff_mul_le],
suffices : a ≤ 1 / b ↔ a * b ≤ 1, { simpa [div_eq_mul_inv, h] },
exact le_div_iff_mul_le (or.inl (mt coe_eq_coe.1 h)) (or.inl coe_ne_top)
end
lemma mul_inv_cancel (h0 : a ≠ 0) (ht : a ≠ ∞) : a * a⁻¹ = 1 :=
begin
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ht,
norm_cast at *,
exact mul_inv_cancel h0
end
lemma inv_mul_cancel (h0 : a ≠ 0) (ht : a ≠ ∞) : a⁻¹ * a = 1 :=
mul_comm a a⁻¹ ▸ mul_inv_cancel h0 ht
lemma mul_le_iff_le_inv {a b r : ℝ≥0∞} (hr₀ : r ≠ 0) (hr₁ : r ≠ ∞) : (r * a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ r⁻¹ * b) :=
by rw [← @ennreal.mul_le_mul_left _ a _ hr₀ hr₁, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel hr₀ hr₁, one_mul]
lemma le_of_forall_nnreal_lt {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ r : ℝ≥0, ↑r < x → ↑r ≤ y) : x ≤ y :=
begin
refine le_of_forall_ge_of_dense (λ r hr, _),
lift r to ℝ≥0 using ne_top_of_lt hr,
exact h r hr
end
lemma eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le {x : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ r : ℝ≥0, ↑r ≤ x) : x = ∞ :=
top_unique $ le_of_forall_nnreal_lt $ λ r hr, h r
lemma div_add_div_same {a b c : ℝ≥0∞} : a / c + b / c = (a + b) / c :=
eq.symm $ right_distrib a b (c⁻¹)
lemma div_self (h0 : a ≠ 0) (hI : a ≠ ∞) : a / a = 1 :=
mul_inv_cancel h0 hI
lemma mul_div_cancel (h0 : a ≠ 0) (hI : a ≠ ∞) : (b / a) * a = b :=
by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel h0 hI, mul_one]
lemma mul_div_cancel' (h0 : a ≠ 0) (hI : a ≠ ∞) : a * (b / a) = b :=
by rw [mul_comm, mul_div_cancel h0 hI]
lemma mul_div_le : a * (b / a) ≤ b :=
begin
by_cases h0 : a = 0, { simp [h0] },
by_cases hI : a = ∞, { simp [hI] },
rw mul_div_cancel' h0 hI, exact le_refl b
end
lemma inv_two_add_inv_two : (2:ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ + 2⁻¹ = 1 :=
by rw [← two_mul, ← div_eq_mul_inv, div_self two_ne_zero two_ne_top]
lemma add_halves (a : ℝ≥0∞) : a / 2 + a / 2 = a :=
by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_add, inv_two_add_inv_two, mul_one]
@[simp] lemma div_zero_iff : a / b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = ∞ :=
by simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
@[simp] lemma div_pos_iff : 0 < a / b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ ∞ :=
by simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, not_or_distrib]
lemma half_pos {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : 0 < a) : 0 < a / 2 :=
by simp [ne_of_gt h]
lemma one_half_lt_one : (2⁻¹:ℝ≥0∞) < 1 := inv_lt_one.2 $ one_lt_two
lemma half_lt_self {a : ℝ≥0∞} (hz : a ≠ 0) (ht : a ≠ ∞) : a / 2 < a :=
begin
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ht,
have h : (2 : ℝ≥0∞) = ((2 : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞), from rfl,
have h' : (2 : ℝ≥0) ≠ 0, from _root_.two_ne_zero',
rw [h, ← coe_div h', coe_lt_coe], -- `norm_cast` fails to apply `coe_div`
norm_cast at hz,
exact nnreal.half_lt_self hz
end
lemma sub_half (h : a ≠ ∞) : a - a / 2 = a / 2 :=
begin
lift a to ℝ≥0 using h,
exact sub_eq_of_add_eq (mul_ne_top coe_ne_top $ by simp) (add_halves a)
end
lemma one_sub_inv_two : (1:ℝ≥0∞) - 2⁻¹ = 2⁻¹ :=
by simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, one_mul] using sub_half one_ne_top
lemma exists_inv_nat_lt {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a ≠ 0) :
∃n:ℕ, (n:ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ < a :=
@inv_inv a ▸ by simp only [inv_lt_inv, ennreal.exists_nat_gt (inv_ne_top.2 h)]
lemma exists_nat_pos_mul_gt (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ ∞) :
∃ n > 0, b < (n : ℕ) * a :=
begin
have : b / a ≠ ∞, from mul_ne_top hb (inv_ne_top.2 ha),
refine (ennreal.exists_nat_gt this).imp (λ n hn, _),
have : 0 < (n : ℝ≥0∞), from (zero_le _).trans_lt hn,
refine ⟨coe_nat_lt_coe_nat.1 this, _⟩,
rwa [← ennreal.div_lt_iff (or.inl ha) (or.inr hb)]
end
lemma exists_nat_mul_gt (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ ∞) :
∃ n : ℕ, b < n * a :=
(exists_nat_pos_mul_gt ha hb).imp $ λ n, Exists.snd
lemma exists_nat_pos_inv_mul_lt (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
∃ n > 0, ((n : ℕ) : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ * a < b :=
begin
rcases exists_nat_pos_mul_gt hb ha with ⟨n, npos, hn⟩,
have : (n : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ 0 := nat.cast_ne_zero.2 npos.lt.ne',
use [n, npos],
rwa [← one_mul b, ← inv_mul_cancel this coe_nat_ne_top,
mul_assoc, mul_lt_mul_left (inv_ne_zero.2 coe_nat_ne_top) (inv_ne_top.2 this)]
end
lemma exists_nnreal_pos_mul_lt (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
∃ n > 0, ↑(n : ℝ≥0) * a < b :=
begin
rcases exists_nat_pos_inv_mul_lt ha hb with ⟨n, npos : 0 < n, hn⟩,
use (n : ℝ≥0)⁻¹,
simp [*, npos.ne', zero_lt_one]
end
end inv
section real
lemma to_real_add (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : (a+b).to_real = a.to_real + b.to_real :=
begin
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha,
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb,
refl
end
lemma to_real_add_le : (a+b).to_real ≤ a.to_real + b.to_real :=
if ha : a = ∞ then by simp only [ha, top_add, top_to_real, zero_add, to_real_nonneg]
else if hb : b = ∞ then by simp only [hb, add_top, top_to_real, add_zero, to_real_nonneg]
else le_of_eq (to_real_add ha hb)
lemma of_real_add {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
ennreal.of_real (p + q) = ennreal.of_real p + ennreal.of_real q :=
by rw [ennreal.of_real, ennreal.of_real, ennreal.of_real, ← coe_add,
coe_eq_coe, nnreal.of_real_add hp hq]
lemma of_real_add_le {p q : ℝ} : ennreal.of_real (p + q) ≤ ennreal.of_real p + ennreal.of_real q :=
coe_le_coe.2 nnreal.of_real_add_le
@[simp] lemma to_real_le_to_real (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.to_real ≤ b.to_real ↔ a ≤ b :=
begin
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha,
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb,
norm_cast
end
@[simp] lemma to_real_lt_to_real (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.to_real < b.to_real ↔ a < b :=
begin
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha,
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb,
norm_cast
end
lemma to_real_max (hr : a ≠ ∞) (hp : b ≠ ∞) :
ennreal.to_real (max a b) = max (ennreal.to_real a) (ennreal.to_real b) :=
(le_total a b).elim
(λ h, by simp only [h, (ennreal.to_real_le_to_real hr hp).2 h, max_eq_right])
(λ h, by simp only [h, (ennreal.to_real_le_to_real hp hr).2 h, max_eq_left])
lemma to_nnreal_pos_iff : 0 < a.to_nnreal ↔ (0 < a ∧ a ≠ ∞) :=
begin
cases a,
{ simp [none_eq_top] },
{ simp [some_eq_coe] }
end
lemma to_real_pos_iff : 0 < a.to_real ↔ (0 < a ∧ a ≠ ∞):=
(nnreal.coe_pos).trans to_nnreal_pos_iff
lemma of_real_le_of_real {p q : ℝ} (h : p ≤ q) : ennreal.of_real p ≤ ennreal.of_real q :=
by simp [ennreal.of_real, nnreal.of_real_le_of_real h]
lemma of_real_le_of_le_to_real {a : ℝ} {b : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a ≤ ennreal.to_real b) :
ennreal.of_real a ≤ b :=
(of_real_le_of_real h).trans of_real_to_real_le
@[simp] lemma of_real_le_of_real_iff {p q : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ q) :
ennreal.of_real p ≤ ennreal.of_real q ↔ p ≤ q :=
by rw [ennreal.of_real, ennreal.of_real, coe_le_coe, nnreal.of_real_le_of_real_iff h]
@[simp] lemma of_real_lt_of_real_iff {p q : ℝ} (h : 0 < q) :
ennreal.of_real p < ennreal.of_real q ↔ p < q :=
by rw [ennreal.of_real, ennreal.of_real, coe_lt_coe, nnreal.of_real_lt_of_real_iff h]
lemma of_real_lt_of_real_iff_of_nonneg {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) :
ennreal.of_real p < ennreal.of_real q ↔ p < q :=
by rw [ennreal.of_real, ennreal.of_real, coe_lt_coe, nnreal.of_real_lt_of_real_iff_of_nonneg hp]
@[simp] lemma of_real_pos {p : ℝ} : 0 < ennreal.of_real p ↔ 0 < p :=
by simp [ennreal.of_real]
@[simp] lemma of_real_eq_zero {p : ℝ} : ennreal.of_real p = 0 ↔ p ≤ 0 :=
by simp [ennreal.of_real]
lemma of_real_le_iff_le_to_real {a : ℝ} {b : ℝ≥0∞} (hb : b ≠ ∞) :
ennreal.of_real a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ ennreal.to_real b :=
begin
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb,
simpa [ennreal.of_real, ennreal.to_real] using nnreal.of_real_le_iff_le_coe
end
lemma of_real_lt_iff_lt_to_real {a : ℝ} {b : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : b ≠ ∞) :
ennreal.of_real a < b ↔ a < ennreal.to_real b :=
begin
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb,
simpa [ennreal.of_real, ennreal.to_real] using nnreal.of_real_lt_iff_lt_coe ha
end
lemma le_of_real_iff_to_real_le {a : ℝ≥0∞} {b : ℝ} (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
a ≤ ennreal.of_real b ↔ ennreal.to_real a ≤ b :=
begin
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha,
simpa [ennreal.of_real, ennreal.to_real] using nnreal.le_of_real_iff_coe_le hb
end
lemma to_real_le_of_le_of_real {a : ℝ≥0∞} {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 ≤ b) (h : a ≤ ennreal.of_real b) :
ennreal.to_real a ≤ b :=
have ha : a ≠ ∞, from ne_top_of_le_ne_top of_real_ne_top h,
(le_of_real_iff_to_real_le ha hb).1 h
lemma lt_of_real_iff_to_real_lt {a : ℝ≥0∞} {b : ℝ} (ha : a ≠ ∞) :
a < ennreal.of_real b ↔ ennreal.to_real a < b :=
begin
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha,
simpa [ennreal.of_real, ennreal.to_real] using nnreal.lt_of_real_iff_coe_lt
end
lemma of_real_mul {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) :
ennreal.of_real (p * q) = (ennreal.of_real p) * (ennreal.of_real q) :=
by { simp only [ennreal.of_real, coe_mul.symm, coe_eq_coe], exact nnreal.of_real_mul hp }
lemma of_real_inv_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) :
(ennreal.of_real x)⁻¹ = ennreal.of_real x⁻¹ :=
by rw [ennreal.of_real, ennreal.of_real, ←@coe_inv (nnreal.of_real x) (by simp [hx]), coe_eq_coe,
nnreal.of_real_inv.symm]
lemma of_real_div_of_pos {x y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) :
ennreal.of_real (x / y) = ennreal.of_real x / ennreal.of_real y :=
by rw [div_eq_inv_mul, div_eq_mul_inv, of_real_mul (inv_nonneg.2 hy.le), of_real_inv_of_pos hy,
mul_comm]
lemma to_real_of_real_mul (c : ℝ) (a : ℝ≥0∞) (h : 0 ≤ c) :
ennreal.to_real ((ennreal.of_real c) * a) = c * ennreal.to_real a :=
begin
cases a,
{ simp only [none_eq_top, ennreal.to_real, top_to_nnreal, nnreal.coe_zero, mul_zero, mul_top],
by_cases h' : c ≤ 0,
{ rw [if_pos], { simp }, { convert of_real_zero, exact le_antisymm h' h } },
{ rw [if_neg], refl, rw [of_real_eq_zero], assumption } },
{ simp only [ennreal.to_real, ennreal.to_nnreal],
simp only [some_eq_coe, ennreal.of_real, coe_mul.symm, to_nnreal_coe, nnreal.coe_mul],
congr, apply nnreal.coe_of_real, exact h }
end
@[simp] lemma to_nnreal_mul_top (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ennreal.to_nnreal (a * ∞) = 0 :=
begin
by_cases h : a = 0,
{ rw [h, zero_mul, zero_to_nnreal] },
{ rw [mul_top, if_neg h, top_to_nnreal] }
end
@[simp] lemma to_nnreal_top_mul (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ennreal.to_nnreal (∞ * a) = 0 :=
by rw [mul_comm, to_nnreal_mul_top]
@[simp] lemma to_real_mul_top (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ennreal.to_real (a * ∞) = 0 :=
by rw [ennreal.to_real, to_nnreal_mul_top, nnreal.coe_zero]
@[simp] lemma to_real_top_mul (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ennreal.to_real (∞ * a) = 0 :=
by { rw mul_comm, exact to_real_mul_top _ }
lemma to_real_eq_to_real (ha : a < ∞) (hb : b < ∞) :
ennreal.to_real a = ennreal.to_real b ↔ a = b :=
begin
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha.ne,
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb.ne,
simp only [coe_eq_coe, nnreal.coe_eq, coe_to_real],
end
/-- `ennreal.to_nnreal` as a `monoid_hom`. -/
def to_nnreal_hom : ℝ≥0∞ →* ℝ≥0 :=
{ to_fun := ennreal.to_nnreal,
map_one' := to_nnreal_coe,
map_mul' := by rintro (_|x) (_|y); simp only [← coe_mul, none_eq_top, some_eq_coe,
to_nnreal_top_mul, to_nnreal_mul_top, top_to_nnreal, mul_zero, zero_mul, to_nnreal_coe] }
lemma to_nnreal_mul {a b : ℝ≥0∞}: (a * b).to_nnreal = a.to_nnreal * b.to_nnreal :=
to_nnreal_hom.map_mul a b
lemma to_nnreal_pow (a : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) : (a ^ n).to_nnreal = a.to_nnreal ^ n :=
to_nnreal_hom.map_pow a n
lemma to_nnreal_prod {ι : Type*} {s : finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} :
(∏ i in s, f i).to_nnreal = ∏ i in s, (f i).to_nnreal :=
to_nnreal_hom.map_prod _ _
/-- `ennreal.to_real` as a `monoid_hom`. -/
def to_real_hom : ℝ≥0∞ →* ℝ :=
(nnreal.to_real_hom : ℝ≥0 →* ℝ).comp to_nnreal_hom
lemma to_real_mul : (a * b).to_real = a.to_real * b.to_real :=
to_real_hom.map_mul a b
lemma to_real_pow (a : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) : (a ^ n).to_real = a.to_real ^ n :=
to_real_hom.map_pow a n
lemma to_real_prod {ι : Type*} {s : finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} :
(∏ i in s, f i).to_real = ∏ i in s, (f i).to_real :=
to_real_hom.map_prod _ _
lemma of_real_prod_of_nonneg {s : finset α} {f : α → ℝ} (hf : ∀ i, i ∈ s → 0 ≤ f i) :
ennreal.of_real (∏ i in s, f i) = ∏ i in s, ennreal.of_real (f i) :=
begin
simp_rw [ennreal.of_real, ←coe_finset_prod, coe_eq_coe],
exact nnreal.of_real_prod_of_nonneg hf,
end
end real
section infi
variables {ι : Sort*} {f g : ι → ℝ≥0∞}
lemma infi_add : infi f + a = ⨅i, f i + a :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume i, add_le_add (infi_le _ _) $ le_refl _)
(ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add.1 $ le_infi $ assume i, ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add.2 $ infi_le _ _)
lemma supr_sub : (⨆i, f i) - a = (⨆i, f i - a) :=
le_antisymm
(ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add.2 $ supr_le $ assume i, ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add.1 $ le_supr _ i)
(supr_le $ assume i, ennreal.sub_le_sub (le_supr _ _) (le_refl a))
lemma sub_infi : a - (⨅i, f i) = (⨆i, a - f i) :=
begin
refine (eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ c, _),
rw [ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add, add_comm, infi_add],
simp [ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm],
end
lemma Inf_add {s : set ℝ≥0∞} : Inf s + a = ⨅b∈s, b + a :=
by simp [Inf_eq_infi, infi_add]
lemma add_infi {a : ℝ≥0∞} : a + infi f = ⨅b, a + f b :=
by rw [add_comm, infi_add]; simp [add_comm]
lemma infi_add_infi (h : ∀i j, ∃k, f k + g k ≤ f i + g j) : infi f + infi g = (⨅a, f a + g a) :=
suffices (⨅a, f a + g a) ≤ infi f + infi g,
from le_antisymm (le_infi $ assume a, add_le_add (infi_le _ _) (infi_le _ _)) this,
calc (⨅a, f a + g a) ≤ (⨅ a a', f a + g a') :
le_infi $ assume a, le_infi $ assume a',
let ⟨k, h⟩ := h a a' in infi_le_of_le k h
... ≤ infi f + infi g :
by simp [add_infi, infi_add, -add_comm, -le_infi_iff]; exact le_refl _
lemma infi_sum {f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : finset α} [nonempty ι]
(h : ∀(t : finset α) (i j : ι), ∃k, ∀a∈t, f k a ≤ f i a ∧ f k a ≤ f j a) :
(⨅i, ∑ a in s, f i a) = ∑ a in s, ⨅i, f i a :=
finset.induction_on s (by simp) $ assume a s ha ih,
have ∀ (i j : ι), ∃ (k : ι), f k a + ∑ b in s, f k b ≤ f i a + ∑ b in s, f j b,
from assume i j,
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := h (insert a s) i j in
⟨k, add_le_add (hk a (finset.mem_insert_self _ _)).left $ finset.sum_le_sum $
assume a ha, (hk _ $ finset.mem_insert_of_mem ha).right⟩,
by simp [ha, ih.symm, infi_add_infi this]
lemma infi_mul {ι} [nonempty ι] {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {x : ℝ≥0∞} (h : x ≠ ∞) :
infi f * x = ⨅i, f i * x :=
begin
by_cases h2 : x = 0, simp only [h2, mul_zero, infi_const],
refine le_antisymm
(le_infi $ λ i, mul_right_mono $ infi_le _ _)
((div_le_iff_le_mul (or.inl h2) $ or.inl h).mp $ le_infi $
λ i, (div_le_iff_le_mul (or.inl h2) $ or.inl h).mpr $ infi_le _ _)
end
lemma mul_infi {ι} [nonempty ι] {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {x : ℝ≥0∞} (h : x ≠ ∞) :
x * infi f = ⨅i, x * f i :=
by { rw [mul_comm, infi_mul h], simp only [mul_comm], assumption }
/-! `supr_mul`, `mul_supr` and variants are in `topology.instances.ennreal`. -/
end infi
section supr
lemma supr_coe_nat : (⨆n:ℕ, (n : ℝ≥0∞)) = ∞ :=
(supr_eq_top _).2 $ assume b hb, ennreal.exists_nat_gt (lt_top_iff_ne_top.1 hb)
end supr
/-- `le_of_add_le_add_left` is normally applicable to `ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid`,
but it holds in `ℝ≥0∞` with the additional assumption that `a < ∞`. -/
lemma le_of_add_le_add_left {a b c : ℝ≥0∞} : a < ∞ →
a + b ≤ a + c → b ≤ c :=
by cases a; cases b; cases c; simp [← ennreal.coe_add, ennreal.coe_le_coe]
end ennreal
|
14fe98eda1bb4bddcea2d264e8f0c3e67195925b | 5756a081670ba9c1d1d3fca7bd47cb4e31beae66 | /Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Tactic/Mathlib.lean | ffae689b03f9af9314dfa1b50b4ea275af546238 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathport | 2c9bdc8292168febf59799efdc5451dbf0450d4a | 13051f68064f7638970d39a8fecaede68ffbf9e1 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,841,364,079 | 1,693,813,111,000 | 1,693,813,111,000 | 379,357,010 | 27 | 10 | Apache-2.0 | 1,691,309,132,000 | 1,624,384,521,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,750 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathport.Syntax.Translate.Tactic.Basic
import Mathport.Syntax.Translate.Tactic.Lean3
import Mathport.Syntax.Translate.Tactic.Mathlib.Alias
import Mathport.Syntax.Translate.Tactic.Mathlib.Apply
import Mathport.Syntax.Translate.Tactic.Mathlib.Cache
import Mathport.Syntax.Translate.Tactic.Mathlib.Choose
import Mathport.Syntax.Translate.Tactic.Mathlib.Clear
import Mathport.Syntax.Translate.Tactic.Mathlib.Congr
import Mathport.Syntax.Translate.Tactic.Mathlib.Converter
import Mathport.Syntax.Translate.Tactic.Mathlib.Core
import Mathport.Syntax.Translate.Tactic.Mathlib.DocCommands
import Mathport.Syntax.Translate.Tactic.Mathlib.Ext
import Mathport.Syntax.Translate.Tactic.Mathlib.Finish
import Mathport.Syntax.Translate.Tactic.Mathlib.Hint
import Mathport.Syntax.Translate.Tactic.Mathlib.Interactive
import Mathport.Syntax.Translate.Tactic.Mathlib.Linarith
import Mathport.Syntax.Translate.Tactic.Mathlib.Lint
import Mathport.Syntax.Translate.Tactic.Mathlib.Misc1
import Mathport.Syntax.Translate.Tactic.Mathlib.Misc2
import Mathport.Syntax.Translate.Tactic.Mathlib.Monotonicity
import Mathport.Syntax.Translate.Tactic.Mathlib.NormCast
import Mathport.Syntax.Translate.Tactic.Mathlib.NormNum
import Mathport.Syntax.Translate.Tactic.Mathlib.Padics
import Mathport.Syntax.Translate.Tactic.Mathlib.RCases
import Mathport.Syntax.Translate.Tactic.Mathlib.Ring
import Mathport.Syntax.Translate.Tactic.Mathlib.Simps
import Mathport.Syntax.Translate.Tactic.Mathlib.SolveByElim
import Mathport.Syntax.Translate.Tactic.Mathlib.Squeeze
import Mathport.Syntax.Translate.Tactic.Mathlib.Suggest
|
24be274663566867a4ac9cdd7122cd89118bd7e7 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/algebraic_geometry/stalks.lean | ce1bcf0f929dbb4320b05ef01c6325a7def97e57 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,586 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import algebraic_geometry.presheafed_space
import category_theory.limits.final
import topology.sheaves.stalks
/-!
# Stalks for presheaved spaces
This file lifts constructions of stalks and pushforwards of stalks to work with
the category of presheafed spaces. Additionally, we prove that restriction of
presheafed spaces does not change the stalks.
-/
noncomputable theory
universes v u v' u'
open category_theory
open category_theory.limits category_theory.category category_theory.functor
open algebraic_geometry
open topological_space
open opposite
variables {C : Type u} [category.{v} C] [has_colimits C]
local attribute [tidy] tactic.op_induction'
open Top.presheaf
namespace algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace
/--
The stalk at `x` of a `PresheafedSpace`.
-/
abbreviation stalk (X : PresheafedSpace C) (x : X) : C := X.presheaf.stalk x
/--
A morphism of presheafed spaces induces a morphism of stalks.
-/
def stalk_map {X Y : PresheafedSpace.{v} C} (α : X ⟶ Y) (x : X) : Y.stalk (α.base x) ⟶ X.stalk x :=
(stalk_functor C (α.base x)).map (α.c) ≫ X.presheaf.stalk_pushforward C α.base x
@[simp, elementwise, reassoc]
lemma stalk_map_germ {X Y : PresheafedSpace.{v} C} (α : X ⟶ Y) (U : opens Y.carrier)
(x : (opens.map α.base).obj U) :
Y.presheaf.germ ⟨α.base x, x.2⟩ ≫ stalk_map α ↑x = α.c.app (op U) ≫ X.presheaf.germ x :=
by rw [stalk_map, stalk_functor_map_germ_assoc, stalk_pushforward_germ]
section restrict
/--
For an open embedding `f : U ⟶ X` and a point `x : U`, we get an isomorphism between the stalk
of `X` at `f x` and the stalk of the restriction of `X` along `f` at t `x`.
-/
def restrict_stalk_iso {U : Top} (X : PresheafedSpace.{v} C)
{f : U ⟶ (X : Top.{v})} (h : open_embedding f) (x : U) :
(X.restrict h).stalk x ≅ X.stalk (f x) :=
begin
-- As a left adjoint, the functor `h.is_open_map.functor_nhds x` is initial.
haveI := initial_of_adjunction (h.is_open_map.adjunction_nhds x),
-- Typeclass resolution knows that the opposite of an initial functor is final. The result
-- follows from the general fact that postcomposing with a final functor doesn't change colimits.
exact final.colimit_iso (h.is_open_map.functor_nhds x).op
((open_nhds.inclusion (f x)).op ⋙ X.presheaf),
end
@[simp, elementwise, reassoc]
lemma restrict_stalk_iso_hom_eq_germ {U : Top} (X : PresheafedSpace.{v} C) {f : U ⟶ (X : Top.{v})}
(h : open_embedding f) (V : opens U) (x : U) (hx : x ∈ V) :
(X.restrict h).presheaf.germ ⟨x, hx⟩ ≫ (restrict_stalk_iso X h x).hom =
X.presheaf.germ ⟨f x, show f x ∈ h.is_open_map.functor.obj V, from ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩⟩ :=
colimit.ι_pre ((open_nhds.inclusion (f x)).op ⋙ X.presheaf)
(h.is_open_map.functor_nhds x).op (op ⟨V, hx⟩)
@[simp, elementwise, reassoc]
lemma restrict_stalk_iso_inv_eq_germ {U : Top} (X : PresheafedSpace.{v} C) {f : U ⟶ (X : Top.{v})}
(h : open_embedding f) (V : opens U) (x : U) (hx : x ∈ V) :
X.presheaf.germ ⟨f x, show f x ∈ h.is_open_map.functor.obj V, from ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩⟩ ≫
(restrict_stalk_iso X h x).inv = (X.restrict h).presheaf.germ ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
by rw [← restrict_stalk_iso_hom_eq_germ, category.assoc, iso.hom_inv_id, category.comp_id]
lemma restrict_stalk_iso_inv_eq_of_restrict {U : Top} (X : PresheafedSpace.{v} C)
{f : U ⟶ (X : Top.{v})} (h : open_embedding f) (x : U) :
(X.restrict_stalk_iso h x).inv = stalk_map (X.of_restrict h) x :=
begin
ext V,
induction V using opposite.rec,
let i : (h.is_open_map.functor_nhds x).obj ((open_nhds.map f x).obj V) ⟶ V :=
hom_of_le (set.image_preimage_subset f _),
erw [iso.comp_inv_eq, colimit.ι_map_assoc, colimit.ι_map_assoc, colimit.ι_pre],
simp_rw category.assoc,
erw colimit.ι_pre ((open_nhds.inclusion (f x)).op ⋙ X.presheaf)
(h.is_open_map.functor_nhds x).op,
erw ← X.presheaf.map_comp_assoc,
exact (colimit.w ((open_nhds.inclusion (f x)).op ⋙ X.presheaf) i.op).symm,
end
instance of_restrict_stalk_map_is_iso {U : Top} (X : PresheafedSpace.{v} C)
{f : U ⟶ (X : Top.{v})} (h : open_embedding f) (x : U) :
is_iso (stalk_map (X.of_restrict h) x) :=
by { rw ← restrict_stalk_iso_inv_eq_of_restrict, apply_instance }
end restrict
namespace stalk_map
@[simp] lemma id (X : PresheafedSpace.{v} C) (x : X) : stalk_map (𝟙 X) x = 𝟙 (X.stalk x) :=
begin
dsimp [stalk_map],
simp only [stalk_pushforward.id],
rw [←map_comp],
convert (stalk_functor C x).map_id X.presheaf,
tidy,
end
-- TODO understand why this proof is still gross (i.e. requires using `erw`)
@[simp] lemma comp {X Y Z : PresheafedSpace.{v} C} (α : X ⟶ Y) (β : Y ⟶ Z) (x : X) :
stalk_map (α ≫ β) x =
(stalk_map β (α.base x) : Z.stalk (β.base (α.base x)) ⟶ Y.stalk (α.base x)) ≫
(stalk_map α x : Y.stalk (α.base x) ⟶ X.stalk x) :=
begin
dsimp [stalk_map, stalk_functor, stalk_pushforward],
ext U,
induction U using opposite.rec,
cases U,
simp only [colimit.ι_map_assoc, colimit.ι_pre_assoc, colimit.ι_pre,
whisker_left_app, whisker_right_app,
assoc, id_comp, map_id, map_comp],
dsimp,
simp only [map_id, assoc, pushforward.comp_inv_app],
-- FIXME Why doesn't simp do this:
erw [category_theory.functor.map_id],
erw [category_theory.functor.map_id],
erw [id_comp, id_comp],
end
/--
If `α = β` and `x = x'`, we would like to say that `stalk_map α x = stalk_map β x'`.
Unfortunately, this equality is not well-formed, as their types are not _definitionally_ the same.
To get a proper congruence lemma, we therefore have to introduce these `eq_to_hom` arrows on
either side of the equality.
-/
lemma congr {X Y : PresheafedSpace.{v} C} (α β : X ⟶ Y) (h₁ : α = β) (x x': X) (h₂ : x = x') :
stalk_map α x ≫ eq_to_hom (show X.stalk x = X.stalk x', by rw h₂) =
eq_to_hom (show Y.stalk (α.base x) = Y.stalk (β.base x'), by rw [h₁, h₂]) ≫ stalk_map β x' :=
stalk_hom_ext _ $ λ U hx, by { subst h₁, subst h₂, simp }
lemma congr_hom {X Y : PresheafedSpace.{v} C} (α β : X ⟶ Y) (h : α = β) (x : X) :
stalk_map α x =
eq_to_hom (show Y.stalk (α.base x) = Y.stalk (β.base x), by rw h) ≫ stalk_map β x :=
by rw [← stalk_map.congr α β h x x rfl, eq_to_hom_refl, category.comp_id]
lemma congr_point {X Y : PresheafedSpace.{v} C} (α : X ⟶ Y) (x x' : X) (h : x = x') :
stalk_map α x ≫ eq_to_hom (show X.stalk x = X.stalk x', by rw h) =
eq_to_hom (show Y.stalk (α.base x) = Y.stalk (α.base x'), by rw h) ≫ stalk_map α x' :=
by rw stalk_map.congr α α rfl x x' h
instance is_iso {X Y : PresheafedSpace.{v} C} (α : X ⟶ Y) [is_iso α] (x : X) :
is_iso (stalk_map α x) :=
{ out := begin
let β : Y ⟶ X := category_theory.inv α,
have h_eq : (α ≫ β).base x = x,
{ rw [is_iso.hom_inv_id α, id_base, Top.id_app] },
-- Intuitively, the inverse of the stalk map of `α` at `x` should just be the stalk map of `β`
-- at `α x`. Unfortunately, we have a problem with dependent type theory here: Because `x`
-- is not *definitionally* equal to `β (α x)`, the map `stalk_map β (α x)` has not the correct
-- type for an inverse.
-- To get a proper inverse, we need to compose with the `eq_to_hom` arrow
-- `X.stalk x ⟶ X.stalk ((α ≫ β).base x)`.
refine ⟨eq_to_hom (show X.stalk x = X.stalk ((α ≫ β).base x), by rw h_eq) ≫
(stalk_map β (α.base x) : _), _, _⟩,
{ rw [← category.assoc, congr_point α x ((α ≫ β).base x) h_eq.symm, category.assoc],
erw ← stalk_map.comp β α (α.base x),
rw [congr_hom _ _ (is_iso.inv_hom_id α), stalk_map.id, eq_to_hom_trans_assoc,
eq_to_hom_refl, category.id_comp] },
{ rw [category.assoc, ← stalk_map.comp, congr_hom _ _ (is_iso.hom_inv_id α),
stalk_map.id, eq_to_hom_trans_assoc, eq_to_hom_refl, category.id_comp] },
end }
/--
An isomorphism between presheafed spaces induces an isomorphism of stalks.
-/
def stalk_iso {X Y : PresheafedSpace.{v} C} (α : X ≅ Y) (x : X) :
Y.stalk (α.hom.base x) ≅ X.stalk x :=
as_iso (stalk_map α.hom x)
@[simp, reassoc, elementwise]
lemma stalk_specializes_stalk_map {X Y : PresheafedSpace.{v} C} (f : X ⟶ Y) {x y : X} (h : x ⤳ y) :
Y.presheaf.stalk_specializes (f.base.map_specializes h) ≫ stalk_map f x =
stalk_map f y ≫ X.presheaf.stalk_specializes h :=
by { delta PresheafedSpace.stalk_map, simp [stalk_map] }
end stalk_map
end algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace
|
ab748b16137f00ca3c219ed7244a0b8f901e1553 | 4fa161becb8ce7378a709f5992a594764699e268 | /src/ring_theory/principal_ideal_domain.lean | 36f3ea7431beb49093f06ec756d9ffe54daab657 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | laughinggas/mathlib | e4aa4565ae34e46e834434284cb26bd9d67bc373 | 86dcd5cda7a5017c8b3c8876c89a510a19d49aad | refs/heads/master | 1,669,496,232,688 | 1,592,831,995,000 | 1,592,831,995,000 | 274,155,979 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,592,835,190,000 | 1,592,835,189,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,158 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Chris Hughes, Morenikeji Neri
-/
import ring_theory.noetherian
import ring_theory.unique_factorization_domain
/-!
# Principal ideal rings and principal ideal domains
A principal ideal ring (PIR) is a commutative ring in which all ideals are principal. A
principal ideal domain (PID) is an integral domain which is a principal ideal ring.
# Main definitions
Note that for principal ideal domains, one should use
`[integral domain R] [is_principal_ideal_ring R]`. There is no explicit definition of a PID.
Theorems about PID's are in the `principal_ideal_ring` namespace.
- `is_principal_ideal_ring`: a predicate on commutative rings, saying that every
ideal is principal.
- `generator`: a generator of a principal ideal (or more generally submodule)
- `to_unique_factorization_domain`: a noncomputable definition, putting a UFD structure on a PID.
Note that the definition of a UFD is currently not a predicate, as it contains data
of factorizations of non-zero elements.
# Main results
- `to_maximal_ideal`: a non-zero prime ideal in a PID is maximal.
- `euclidean_domain.to_principal_ideal_domain` : a Euclidean domain is a PID.
-/
universes u v
variables {R : Type u} {M : Type v}
open set function
open submodule
open_locale classical
/-- An `R`-submodule of `M` is principal if it is generated by one element. -/
class submodule.is_principal [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M] (S : submodule R M) : Prop :=
(principal [] : ∃ a, S = span R {a})
/-- A commutative ring is a principal ideal ring if all ideals are principal. -/
class is_principal_ideal_ring (R : Type u) [comm_ring R] : Prop :=
(principal : ∀ (S : ideal R), S.is_principal)
attribute [instance] is_principal_ideal_ring.principal
namespace submodule.is_principal
variables [comm_ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
/-- `generator I`, if `I` is a principal submodule, is the `x ∈ M` such that `span R {x} = I` -/
noncomputable def generator (S : submodule R M) [S.is_principal] : M :=
classical.some (principal S)
lemma span_singleton_generator (S : submodule R M) [S.is_principal] : span R {generator S} = S :=
eq.symm (classical.some_spec (principal S))
@[simp] lemma generator_mem (S : submodule R M) [S.is_principal] : generator S ∈ S :=
by { conv_rhs { rw ← span_singleton_generator S }, exact subset_span (mem_singleton _) }
lemma mem_iff_eq_smul_generator (S : submodule R M) [S.is_principal] {x : M} :
x ∈ S ↔ ∃ s : R, x = s • generator S :=
by simp_rw [@eq_comm _ x, ← mem_span_singleton, span_singleton_generator]
lemma mem_iff_generator_dvd (S : ideal R) [S.is_principal] {x : R} : x ∈ S ↔ generator S ∣ x :=
(mem_iff_eq_smul_generator S).trans (exists_congr (λ a, by simp only [mul_comm, smul_eq_mul]))
lemma eq_bot_iff_generator_eq_zero (S : submodule R M) [S.is_principal] :
S = ⊥ ↔ generator S = 0 :=
by rw [← @span_singleton_eq_bot R M, span_singleton_generator]
end submodule.is_principal
namespace is_prime
open submodule.is_principal ideal
-- TODO -- for a non-ID should prove that if p < q then q maximal; 0 isn't prime in a non-ID
lemma to_maximal_ideal [integral_domain R] [is_principal_ideal_ring R] {S : ideal R}
[hpi : is_prime S] (hS : S ≠ ⊥) : is_maximal S :=
is_maximal_iff.2 ⟨(ne_top_iff_one S).1 hpi.1, begin
assume T x hST hxS hxT,
cases (mem_iff_generator_dvd _).1 (hST $ generator_mem S) with z hz,
cases hpi.2 (show generator T * z ∈ S, from hz ▸ generator_mem S),
{ have hTS : T ≤ S, rwa [← span_singleton_generator T, submodule.span_le, singleton_subset_iff],
exact (hxS $ hTS hxT).elim },
cases (mem_iff_generator_dvd _).1 h with y hy,
have : generator S ≠ 0 := mt (eq_bot_iff_generator_eq_zero _).2 hS,
rw [← mul_one (generator S), hy, mul_left_comm, domain.mul_right_inj this] at hz,
exact hz.symm ▸ ideal.mul_mem_right _ (generator_mem T)
end⟩
end is_prime
section
open euclidean_domain
variable [euclidean_domain R]
lemma mod_mem_iff {S : ideal R} {x y : R} (hy : y ∈ S) : x % y ∈ S ↔ x ∈ S :=
⟨λ hxy, div_add_mod x y ▸ ideal.add_mem S (ideal.mul_mem_right S hy) hxy,
λ hx, (mod_eq_sub_mul_div x y).symm ▸ ideal.sub_mem S hx (ideal.mul_mem_right S hy)⟩
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance euclidean_domain.to_principal_ideal_domain : is_principal_ideal_ring R :=
{ principal := λ S, by exactI
⟨if h : {x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0}.nonempty
then
have wf : well_founded (euclidean_domain.r : R → R → Prop) := euclidean_domain.r_well_founded,
have hmin : well_founded.min wf {x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0} h ∈ S ∧
well_founded.min wf {x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0} h ≠ 0,
from well_founded.min_mem wf {x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0} h,
⟨well_founded.min wf {x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0} h,
submodule.ext $ λ x,
⟨λ hx, div_add_mod x (well_founded.min wf {x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0} h) ▸
(ideal.mem_span_singleton.2 $ dvd_add (dvd_mul_right _ _) $
have (x % (well_founded.min wf {x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0} h) ∉ {x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0}),
from λ h₁, well_founded.not_lt_min wf _ h h₁ (mod_lt x hmin.2),
have x % well_founded.min wf {x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0} h = 0, by finish [(mod_mem_iff hmin.1).2 hx],
by simp *),
λ hx, let ⟨y, hy⟩ := ideal.mem_span_singleton.1 hx in hy.symm ▸ ideal.mul_mem_right _ hmin.1⟩⟩
else ⟨0, submodule.ext $ λ a, by rw [← @submodule.bot_coe R R _ _ _, span_eq, submodule.mem_bot]; exact
⟨λ haS, by_contradiction $ λ ha0, h ⟨a, ⟨haS, ha0⟩⟩,
λ h₁, h₁.symm ▸ S.zero_mem⟩⟩⟩ }
end
namespace principal_ideal_ring
open is_principal_ideal_ring
variables [integral_domain R] [is_principal_ideal_ring R]
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance is_noetherian_ring : is_noetherian_ring R :=
⟨assume s : ideal R,
begin
rcases (is_principal_ideal_ring.principal s).principal with ⟨a, rfl⟩,
rw [← finset.coe_singleton],
exact ⟨{a}, submodule.coe_injective rfl⟩
end⟩
lemma is_maximal_of_irreducible {p : R} (hp : irreducible p) :
ideal.is_maximal (span R ({p} : set R)) :=
⟨mt ideal.span_singleton_eq_top.1 hp.1, λ I hI, begin
rcases principal I with ⟨a, rfl⟩,
erw ideal.span_singleton_eq_top,
unfreezeI,
rcases ideal.span_singleton_le_span_singleton.1 (le_of_lt hI) with ⟨b, rfl⟩,
refine (of_irreducible_mul hp).resolve_right (mt (λ hb, _) (not_le_of_lt hI)),
erw [ideal.span_singleton_le_span_singleton, mul_dvd_of_is_unit_right hb]
end⟩
lemma irreducible_iff_prime {p : R} : irreducible p ↔ prime p :=
⟨λ hp, (ideal.span_singleton_prime hp.ne_zero).1 $
(is_maximal_of_irreducible hp).is_prime,
irreducible_of_prime⟩
lemma associates_irreducible_iff_prime : ∀{p : associates R}, irreducible p ↔ p.prime :=
associates.forall_associated.2 $ assume a,
by rw [associates.irreducible_mk_iff, associates.prime_mk, irreducible_iff_prime]
section
open_locale classical
/-- `factors a` is a multiset of irreducible elements whose product is `a`, up to units -/
noncomputable def factors (a : R) : multiset R :=
if h : a = 0 then ∅ else classical.some
(is_noetherian_ring.exists_factors a h)
lemma factors_spec (a : R) (h : a ≠ 0) :
(∀b∈factors a, irreducible b) ∧ associated a (factors a).prod :=
begin
unfold factors, rw [dif_neg h],
exact classical.some_spec
(is_noetherian_ring.exists_factors a h)
end
/-- The unique factorization domain structure given by the principal ideal domain.
This is not added as type class instance, since the `factors` might be computed in a different way.
E.g. factors could return normalized values.
-/
noncomputable def to_unique_factorization_domain : unique_factorization_domain R :=
{ factors := factors,
factors_prod := assume a ha, associated.symm (factors_spec a ha).2,
prime_factors := assume a ha, by simpa [irreducible_iff_prime] using (factors_spec a ha).1 }
end
end principal_ideal_ring
|
0948044923f646c48d8e35c48055b4ee81a1d567 | 57c233acf9386e610d99ed20ef139c5f97504ba3 | /src/data/matrix/notation.lean | 7e0bbc3a240114131ac3e1de9c239e362ccfd038 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | robertylewis/mathlib | 3d16e3e6daf5ddde182473e03a1b601d2810952c | 1d13f5b932f5e40a8308e3840f96fc882fae01f0 | refs/heads/master | 1,651,379,945,369 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 98,875,504 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,644,253,514,000 | 1,501,495,700,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,260 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import data.matrix.basic
import data.fin.vec_notation
/-!
# Matrix and vector notation
This file includes `simp` lemmas for applying operations in `data.matrix.basic` to values built out
of the matrix notation `![a, b] = vec_cons a (vec_cons b vec_empty)` defined in
`data.fin.vec_notation`.
## Implementation notes
The `simp` lemmas require that one of the arguments is of the form `vec_cons _ _`.
This ensures `simp` works with entries only when (some) entries are already given.
In other words, this notation will only appear in the output of `simp` if it
already appears in the input.
## Notations
We reuse notation `![a, b]` for `vec_cons a (vec_cons b vec_empty)`. It is a localized notation in
the `matrix` locale.
## Examples
Examples of usage can be found in the `test/matrix.lean` file.
-/
namespace matrix
universe u
variables {α : Type u} {o n m : ℕ} {m' n' o' : Type*}
open_locale matrix
/-- Use `![...]` notation for displaying a `fin`-indexed matrix, for example:
```
#eval ![![1, 2], ![3, 4]] + ![![3, 4], ![5, 6]] -- ![![4, 6], ![8, 10]]
```
-/
instance [has_repr α] : has_repr (matrix (fin m) (fin n) α) := pi_fin.has_repr
@[simp] lemma cons_val' (v : n' → α) (B : matrix (fin m) n' α) (i j) :
vec_cons v B i j = vec_cons (v j) (λ i, B i j) i :=
by { refine fin.cases _ _ i; simp }
@[simp] lemma head_val' (B : matrix (fin m.succ) n' α) (j : n') :
vec_head (λ i, B i j) = vec_head B j := rfl
@[simp] lemma tail_val' (B : matrix (fin m.succ) n' α) (j : n') :
vec_tail (λ i, B i j) = λ i, vec_tail B i j :=
by { ext, simp [vec_tail] }
section dot_product
variables [add_comm_monoid α] [has_mul α]
@[simp] lemma dot_product_empty (v w : fin 0 → α) :
dot_product v w = 0 := finset.sum_empty
@[simp] lemma cons_dot_product (x : α) (v : fin n → α) (w : fin n.succ → α) :
dot_product (vec_cons x v) w = x * vec_head w + dot_product v (vec_tail w) :=
by simp [dot_product, fin.sum_univ_succ, vec_head, vec_tail]
@[simp] lemma dot_product_cons (v : fin n.succ → α) (x : α) (w : fin n → α) :
dot_product v (vec_cons x w) = vec_head v * x + dot_product (vec_tail v) w :=
by simp [dot_product, fin.sum_univ_succ, vec_head, vec_tail]
@[simp] lemma cons_dot_product_cons (x : α) (v : fin n → α) (y : α) (w : fin n → α) :
dot_product (vec_cons x v) (vec_cons y w) = x * y + dot_product v w :=
by simp
end dot_product
section col_row
@[simp] lemma col_empty (v : fin 0 → α) : col v = vec_empty :=
empty_eq _
@[simp] lemma col_cons (x : α) (u : fin m → α) :
col (vec_cons x u) = vec_cons (λ _, x) (col u) :=
by { ext i j, refine fin.cases _ _ i; simp [vec_head, vec_tail] }
@[simp] lemma row_empty : row (vec_empty : fin 0 → α) = λ _, vec_empty :=
by { ext, refl }
@[simp] lemma row_cons (x : α) (u : fin m → α) :
row (vec_cons x u) = λ _, vec_cons x u :=
by { ext, refl }
end col_row
section transpose
@[simp] lemma transpose_empty_rows (A : matrix m' (fin 0) α) : Aᵀ = ![] := empty_eq _
@[simp] lemma transpose_empty_cols : (![] : matrix (fin 0) m' α)ᵀ = λ i, ![] :=
funext (λ i, empty_eq _)
@[simp] lemma cons_transpose (v : n' → α) (A : matrix (fin m) n' α) :
(vec_cons v A)ᵀ = λ i, vec_cons (v i) (Aᵀ i) :=
by { ext i j, refine fin.cases _ _ j; simp }
@[simp] lemma head_transpose (A : matrix m' (fin n.succ) α) : vec_head (Aᵀ) = vec_head ∘ A :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma tail_transpose (A : matrix m' (fin n.succ) α) : vec_tail (Aᵀ) = (vec_tail ∘ A)ᵀ :=
by { ext i j, refl }
end transpose
section mul
variables [semiring α]
@[simp] lemma empty_mul [fintype n'] (A : matrix (fin 0) n' α) (B : matrix n' o' α) :
A ⬝ B = ![] :=
empty_eq _
@[simp] lemma empty_mul_empty (A : matrix m' (fin 0) α) (B : matrix (fin 0) o' α) :
A ⬝ B = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma mul_empty [fintype n'] (A : matrix m' n' α) (B : matrix n' (fin 0) α) :
A ⬝ B = λ _, ![] :=
funext (λ _, empty_eq _)
lemma mul_val_succ [fintype n']
(A : matrix (fin m.succ) n' α) (B : matrix n' o' α) (i : fin m) (j : o') :
(A ⬝ B) i.succ j = (vec_tail A ⬝ B) i j := rfl
@[simp] lemma cons_mul [fintype n'] (v : n' → α) (A : matrix (fin m) n' α) (B : matrix n' o' α) :
vec_cons v A ⬝ B = vec_cons (vec_mul v B) (A ⬝ B) :=
by { ext i j, refine fin.cases _ _ i, { refl }, simp [mul_val_succ] }
end mul
section vec_mul
variables [semiring α]
@[simp] lemma empty_vec_mul (v : fin 0 → α) (B : matrix (fin 0) o' α) :
vec_mul v B = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma vec_mul_empty [fintype n'] (v : n' → α) (B : matrix n' (fin 0) α) :
vec_mul v B = ![] :=
empty_eq _
@[simp] lemma cons_vec_mul (x : α) (v : fin n → α) (B : matrix (fin n.succ) o' α) :
vec_mul (vec_cons x v) B = x • (vec_head B) + vec_mul v (vec_tail B) :=
by { ext i, simp [vec_mul] }
@[simp] lemma vec_mul_cons (v : fin n.succ → α) (w : o' → α) (B : matrix (fin n) o' α) :
vec_mul v (vec_cons w B) = vec_head v • w + vec_mul (vec_tail v) B :=
by { ext i, simp [vec_mul] }
end vec_mul
section mul_vec
variables [semiring α]
@[simp] lemma empty_mul_vec [fintype n'] (A : matrix (fin 0) n' α) (v : n' → α) :
mul_vec A v = ![] :=
empty_eq _
@[simp] lemma mul_vec_empty (A : matrix m' (fin 0) α) (v : fin 0 → α) :
mul_vec A v = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma cons_mul_vec [fintype n'] (v : n' → α) (A : fin m → n' → α) (w : n' → α) :
mul_vec (vec_cons v A) w = vec_cons (dot_product v w) (mul_vec A w) :=
by { ext i, refine fin.cases _ _ i; simp [mul_vec] }
@[simp] lemma mul_vec_cons {α} [comm_semiring α] (A : m' → (fin n.succ) → α) (x : α)
(v : fin n → α) :
mul_vec A (vec_cons x v) = (x • vec_head ∘ A) + mul_vec (vec_tail ∘ A) v :=
by { ext i, simp [mul_vec, mul_comm] }
end mul_vec
section vec_mul_vec
variables [semiring α]
@[simp] lemma empty_vec_mul_vec (v : fin 0 → α) (w : n' → α) :
vec_mul_vec v w = ![] :=
empty_eq _
@[simp] lemma vec_mul_vec_empty (v : m' → α) (w : fin 0 → α) :
vec_mul_vec v w = λ _, ![] :=
funext (λ i, empty_eq _)
@[simp] lemma cons_vec_mul_vec (x : α) (v : fin m → α) (w : n' → α) :
vec_mul_vec (vec_cons x v) w = vec_cons (x • w) (vec_mul_vec v w) :=
by { ext i, refine fin.cases _ _ i; simp [vec_mul_vec] }
@[simp] lemma vec_mul_vec_cons (v : m' → α) (x : α) (w : fin n → α) :
vec_mul_vec v (vec_cons x w) = λ i, v i • vec_cons x w :=
by { ext i j, rw [vec_mul_vec, pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul] }
end vec_mul_vec
section smul
variables [semiring α]
@[simp] lemma smul_mat_empty {m' : Type*} (x : α) (A : fin 0 → m' → α) : x • A = ![] := empty_eq _
@[simp] lemma smul_mat_cons (x : α) (v : n' → α) (A : matrix (fin m) n' α) :
x • vec_cons v A = vec_cons (x • v) (x • A) :=
by { ext i, refine fin.cases _ _ i; simp }
end smul
section minor
@[simp] lemma minor_empty (A : matrix m' n' α) (row : fin 0 → m') (col : o' → n') :
minor A row col = ![] :=
empty_eq _
@[simp] lemma minor_cons_row (A : matrix m' n' α) (i : m') (row : fin m → m') (col : o' → n') :
minor A (vec_cons i row) col = vec_cons (λ j, A i (col j)) (minor A row col) :=
by { ext i j, refine fin.cases _ _ i; simp [minor] }
end minor
section vec2_and_vec3
lemma vec2_eq {a₀ a₁ b₀ b₁ : α} (h₀ : a₀ = b₀) (h₁ : a₁ = b₁) :
![a₀, a₁] = ![b₀, b₁] :=
by subst_vars
lemma vec3_eq {a₀ a₁ a₂ b₀ b₁ b₂ : α} (h₀ : a₀ = b₀) (h₁ : a₁ = b₁) (h₂ : a₂ = b₂) :
![a₀, a₁, a₂] = ![b₀, b₁, b₂] :=
by subst_vars
lemma vec2_add [has_add α] (a₀ a₁ b₀ b₁ : α) :
![a₀, a₁] + ![b₀, b₁] = ![a₀ + b₀, a₁ + b₁] :=
by rw [cons_add_cons, cons_add_cons, empty_add_empty]
lemma vec3_add [has_add α] (a₀ a₁ a₂ b₀ b₁ b₂ : α) :
![a₀, a₁, a₂] + ![b₀, b₁, b₂] = ![a₀ + b₀, a₁ + b₁, a₂ + b₂] :=
by rw [cons_add_cons, cons_add_cons, cons_add_cons, empty_add_empty]
lemma smul_vec2 {R : Type*} [has_scalar R α] (x : R) (a₀ a₁ : α) :
x • ![a₀, a₁] = ![x • a₀, x • a₁] :=
by rw [smul_cons, smul_cons, smul_empty]
lemma smul_vec3 {R : Type*} [has_scalar R α] (x : R) (a₀ a₁ a₂ : α) :
x • ![a₀, a₁, a₂] = ![x • a₀, x • a₁, x • a₂] :=
by rw [smul_cons, smul_cons, smul_cons, smul_empty]
variables [add_comm_monoid α] [has_mul α]
lemma vec2_dot_product' {a₀ a₁ b₀ b₁ : α} :
![a₀, a₁] ⬝ᵥ ![b₀, b₁] = a₀ * b₀ + a₁ * b₁ :=
by rw [cons_dot_product_cons, cons_dot_product_cons, dot_product_empty, add_zero]
@[simp] lemma vec2_dot_product (v w : fin 2 → α) :
v ⬝ᵥ w = v 0 * w 0 + v 1 * w 1 :=
vec2_dot_product'
lemma vec3_dot_product' {a₀ a₁ a₂ b₀ b₁ b₂ : α} :
![a₀, a₁, a₂] ⬝ᵥ ![b₀, b₁, b₂] = a₀ * b₀ + a₁ * b₁ + a₂ * b₂ :=
by rw [cons_dot_product_cons, cons_dot_product_cons, cons_dot_product_cons,
dot_product_empty, add_zero, add_assoc]
@[simp] lemma vec3_dot_product (v w : fin 3 → α) :
v ⬝ᵥ w = v 0 * w 0 + v 1 * w 1 + v 2 * w 2 :=
vec3_dot_product'
end vec2_and_vec3
end matrix
|
93a5f11ca6fbd2ec6b1727188a0fcdd9a6968857 | cf39355caa609c0f33405126beee2739aa3cb77e | /library/smt/prove.lean | 78498ea4f3184db1660f1df74425ac0993aa12b6 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/lean | 12b87f69d92e614daea8bcc9d4de9a9ace089d0e | cce7990ea86a78bdb383e38ed7f9b5ba93c60ce0 | refs/heads/master | 1,687,508,156,644 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 169,960,991 | 457 | 107 | Apache-2.0 | 1,686,744,372,000 | 1,549,790,268,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 564 | lean | namespace smt
open tactic
private meta def collect_props : list expr → tactic (list expr)
| [] := return []
| (H :: Hs) := do
Eqs ← collect_props Hs,
Htype ← infer_type H >>= infer_type >>= whnf,
return $ if Htype = `(Prop) then (H :: Eqs) else Eqs
-- This tactic is just a placeholder, designed to be modified for specific performance experiments
meta def prove : tactic unit :=
do local_context >>= collect_props >>= revert_lst,
trace "SMT state, after reverting propositions:",
trace_state,
`[simp { contextual := tt }]
end smt
|
d72f94e4c7da7f4808a124db42d8a0d55518ad49 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/eraseSuffix.lean | c9478c98d0eef685c5d9534191298bcb56b1b267 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 364 | lean | example : (`foo.bla).eraseSuffix? `bla == some `foo := rfl
example : (`foo.bla).eraseSuffix? `boo == none := rfl
example : (`foo.bla).eraseSuffix? `foo.bla == some .anonymous := rfl
example : (`foo.bla.boo).eraseSuffix? `bla == none := rfl
example : (`foo.bla.boo).eraseSuffix? `boo == `foo.bla := rfl
example : (`foo.bla.boo).eraseSuffix? `bla.boo == `foo := rfl
|
b2a1705d3aad03ec37dbed425dea634faf3432c5 | 46125763b4dbf50619e8846a1371029346f4c3db | /src/analysis/convex/topology.lean | ef7b352ec0b1f8c9853ea81fef37bfd755057654 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | thjread/mathlib | a9d97612cedc2c3101060737233df15abcdb9eb1 | 7cffe2520a5518bba19227a107078d83fa725ddc | refs/heads/master | 1,615,637,696,376 | 1,583,953,063,000 | 1,583,953,063,000 | 246,680,271 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,583,960,875,000 | 1,583,960,875,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,616 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alexander Bentkamp, Yury Kudriashov
-/
import analysis.convex.basic analysis.normed_space.finite_dimension
/-!
# Topological and metric properties of convex sets
We prove the following facts:
* `convex.interior` : interior of a convex set is convex;
* `convex.closure` : closure of a convex set is convex;
* `set.finite.compact_convex_hull` : convex hull of a finite set is compact;
* `set.finite.is_closed_convex_hull` : convex hull of a finite set is closed;
* `convex_on_dist` : distance to a fixed point is convex on any convex set;
* `convex_hull_ediam`, `convex_hull_diam` : convex hull of a set has the same (e)metric diameter
as the original set;
* `bounded_convex_hull` : convex hull of a set is bounded if and only if the original set
is bounded.
* `bounded_std_simplex`, `is_closed_std_simplex`, `compact_std_simplex`: topological properties
of the standard simplex;
-/
variables {ι : Type*} {E : Type*}
open set
/-! ### Standard simplex -/
section std_simplex
variables [fintype ι]
/-- Every vector in `std_simplex ι` has `max`-norm at most `1`. -/
lemma std_simplex_subset_closed_ball :
std_simplex ι ⊆ metric.closed_ball 0 1 :=
begin
assume f hf,
rw [metric.mem_closed_ball, dist_zero_right],
refine (nnreal.coe_one ▸ nnreal.coe_le.2 $ finset.sup_le $ λ x hx, _),
change abs (f x) ≤ 1,
rw [abs_of_nonneg $ hf.1 x],
exact (mem_Icc_of_mem_std_simplex hf x).2
end
variable (ι)
/-- `std_simplex ι` is bounded. -/
lemma bounded_std_simplex : metric.bounded (std_simplex ι) :=
(metric.bounded_iff_subset_ball 0).2 ⟨1, std_simplex_subset_closed_ball⟩
/-- `std_simplex ι` is closed. -/
lemma is_closed_std_simplex : is_closed (std_simplex ι) :=
(std_simplex_eq_inter ι).symm ▸ is_closed_inter
(is_closed_Inter $ λ i, is_closed_le continuous_const (continuous_apply i))
(is_closed_eq (continuous_finset_sum _ $ λ x _, continuous_apply x) continuous_const)
/-- `std_simplex ι` is compact. -/
lemma compact_std_simplex : compact (std_simplex ι) :=
metric.compact_iff_closed_bounded.2 ⟨is_closed_std_simplex ι, bounded_std_simplex ι⟩
end std_simplex
/-! ### Topological vector space -/
section topological_vector_space
variables [add_comm_group E] [vector_space ℝ E] [topological_space E]
[topological_add_group E] [topological_vector_space ℝ E]
local attribute [instance] set.pointwise_add set.smul_set
/-- In a topological vector space, the interior of a convex set is convex. -/
lemma convex.interior {s : set E} (hs : convex s) : convex (interior s) :=
convex_iff_pointwise_add_subset.mpr $ λ a b ha hb hab,
have h : is_open (a • interior s + b • interior s), from
or.elim (classical.em (a = 0))
(λ heq,
have hne : b ≠ 0, by { rw [heq, zero_add] at hab, rw hab, exact one_ne_zero },
(smul_set_eq_image b (interior s)).symm ▸
(is_open_pointwise_add_left ((is_open_map_smul_of_ne_zero hne _) is_open_interior)))
(λ hne,
(smul_set_eq_image a (interior s)).symm ▸
(is_open_pointwise_add_right ((is_open_map_smul_of_ne_zero hne _) is_open_interior))),
(subset_interior_iff_subset_of_open h).mpr $ subset.trans
begin
apply pointwise_add_subset_add;
rw [smul_set_eq_image, smul_set_eq_image];
exact image_subset _ interior_subset
end
(convex_iff_pointwise_add_subset.mp hs ha hb hab)
/-- In a topological vector space, the closure of a convex set is convex. -/
lemma convex.closure {s : set E} (hs : convex s) : convex (closure s) :=
λ x y hx hy a b ha hb hab,
let f : E → E → E := λ x' y', a • x' + b • y' in
have hf : continuous (λ p : E × E, f p.1 p.2), from
(continuous_const.smul continuous_fst).add (continuous_const.smul continuous_snd),
show f x y ∈ closure s, from
mem_closure_of_continuous2 hf hx hy (λ x' hx' y' hy', subset_closure
(hs hx' hy' ha hb hab))
/-- Convex hull of a finite set is compact. -/
lemma set.finite.compact_convex_hull {s : set E} (hs : finite s) :
compact (convex_hull s) :=
begin
rw [hs.convex_hull_eq_image],
apply (compact_std_simplex _).image,
haveI := hs.fintype,
apply linear_map.continuous_on_pi
end
/-- Convex hull of a finite set is closed. -/
lemma set.finite.is_closed_convex_hull [t2_space E] {s : set E} (hs : finite s) :
is_closed (convex_hull s) :=
closed_of_compact _ hs.compact_convex_hull
end topological_vector_space
/-! ### Normed vector space -/
section normed_space
variables [normed_group E] [normed_space ℝ E]
lemma convex_on_dist (z : E) (s : set E) (hs : convex s) :
convex_on s (λz', dist z' z) :=
and.intro hs $
assume x y hx hy a b ha hb hab,
calc
dist (a • x + b • y) z = ∥ (a • x + b • y) - (a + b) • z ∥ :
by rw [hab, one_smul, normed_group.dist_eq]
... = ∥a • (x - z) + b • (y - z)∥ :
by rw [add_smul, smul_sub, smul_sub, sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_add,
←add_assoc, add_assoc (a • x), add_comm (b • y)]; simp only [add_assoc]
... ≤ ∥a • (x - z)∥ + ∥b • (y - z)∥ :
norm_add_le (a • (x - z)) (b • (y - z))
... = a * dist x z + b * dist y z :
by simp [norm_smul, normed_group.dist_eq, real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg ha, abs_of_nonneg hb]
lemma convex_ball (a : E) (r : ℝ) : convex (metric.ball a r) :=
by simpa only [metric.ball, sep_univ] using (convex_on_dist a _ convex_univ).convex_lt r
lemma convex_closed_ball (a : E) (r : ℝ) : convex (metric.closed_ball a r) :=
by simpa only [metric.closed_ball, sep_univ] using (convex_on_dist a _ convex_univ).convex_le r
/-- Given a point `x` in the convex hull of `s` and a point `y`, there exists a point
of `s` at distance at least `dist x y` from `y`. -/
lemma convex_hull_exists_dist_ge {s : set E} {x : E} (hx : x ∈ convex_hull s) (y : E) :
∃ x' ∈ s, dist x y ≤ dist x' y :=
(convex_on_dist y _ (convex_convex_hull _)).exists_ge_of_mem_convex_hull hx
/-- Given a point `x` in the convex hull of `s` and a point `y` in the convex hull of `t`,
there exist points `x' ∈ s` and `y' ∈ t` at distance at least `dist x y`. -/
lemma convex_hull_exists_dist_ge2 {s t : set E} {x y : E}
(hx : x ∈ convex_hull s) (hy : y ∈ convex_hull t) :
∃ (x' ∈ s) (y' ∈ t), dist x y ≤ dist x' y' :=
begin
rcases convex_hull_exists_dist_ge hx y with ⟨x', hx', Hx'⟩,
rcases convex_hull_exists_dist_ge hy x' with ⟨y', hy', Hy'⟩,
use [x', hx', y', hy'],
exact le_trans Hx' (dist_comm y x' ▸ dist_comm y' x' ▸ Hy')
end
/-- Emetric diameter of the convex hull of a set `s` equals the emetric diameter of `s. -/
@[simp] lemma convex_hull_ediam (s : set E) :
emetric.diam (convex_hull s) = emetric.diam s :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (emetric.diam_le_of_forall_edist_le $ λ x hx y hy, _)
(emetric.diam_mono $ subset_convex_hull s),
rcases convex_hull_exists_dist_ge2 hx hy with ⟨x', hx', y', hy', H⟩,
rw edist_dist,
apply le_trans (ennreal.of_real_le_of_real H),
rw ← edist_dist,
exact emetric.edist_le_diam_of_mem hx' hy'
end
/-- Diameter of the convex hull of a set `s` equals the emetric diameter of `s. -/
@[simp] lemma convex_hull_diam (s : set E) :
metric.diam (convex_hull s) = metric.diam s :=
by simp only [metric.diam, convex_hull_ediam]
/-- Convex hull of `s` is bounded if and only if `s` is bounded. -/
@[simp] lemma bounded_convex_hull {s : set E} :
metric.bounded (convex_hull s) ↔ metric.bounded s :=
by simp only [metric.bounded_iff_ediam_ne_top, convex_hull_ediam]
end normed_space
|
50770d6fb3a93325bd5c753d5264520437bd5cbc | f3849be5d845a1cb97680f0bbbe03b85518312f0 | /tmp/even_odd.lean | 852e0e5886ceac95a43673f4d1a03235e1ce98d0 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | bjoeris/lean | 0ed95125d762b17bfcb54dad1f9721f953f92eeb | 4e496b78d5e73545fa4f9a807155113d8e6b0561 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,251,218,281 | 1,495,337,658,000 | 1,495,337,658,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 705 | lean | import data.vector
open nat
universes u v
set_option trace.eqn_compiler.wf_rec true
set_option trace.debug.eqn_compiler.wf_rec true
set_option trace.debug.eqn_compiler.mutual true
mutual def even, odd
with even : nat → bool
| 0 := tt
| (a+1) := odd a
with odd : nat → bool
| 0 := ff
| (a+1) := even a
#eval even._main 3
#eval even._main 4
#eval odd._main 3
#eval odd._main 4
mutual def f, g {α β : Type u} (f : α → β) (p : α × β)
with f : Π n : nat, vector (α × β) n
| 0 := vector.nil
| (succ n) := vector.cons p $ (g n p.1).map (λ b, (p.1, b))
with g : Π n : nat, α → vector β n
| 0 a := vector.nil
| (succ n) a := vector.cons p.2 $ (f n).map (λ p, p.2)
|
8764c1b8f111ff8b2ebeb94e0fda1b6b775cfd8f | 38aa1f7792ba7c73b43619c5d089e15d69cd32eb | /lamps_array.lean | 99fbc6cb8ff2da17182f0cdb93c18ea05162d831 | [] | no_license | mirefek/my-lean-experiments | f8ec3efa4013285b80cd45c219a7bc8b6294b8cc | 1218fecbf568669ac123256d430a151a900f67b3 | refs/heads/master | 1,679,449,694,211 | 1,616,190,468,000 | 1,616,190,468,000 | 154,370,734 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,273 | lean | import tactic
import tactic.norm_cast
import data.rat
import data.fintype
import data.real.basic
import data.nat.parity
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical
/--- problem statement ---/
def lamp_switch_seq (n k : ℕ) := array k (fin (n+n))
--local attribute [instance] classical.prop_decidable
instance (n k : ℕ) : has_mem (fin (n+n)) (lamp_switch_seq n k) := array.has_mem
instance (n k : ℕ) : fintype (lamp_switch_seq n k) :=
begin
unfold lamp_switch_seq,
apply_instance
end
def lamp_state (n : ℕ) := array (n+n) bool
def ini_state (n : ℕ) : (lamp_state n) := ⟨λ i : fin (n+n), ff⟩
def target_state (n : ℕ) : (lamp_state n) := ⟨λ i : fin (n+n), (i:ℕ) < n⟩
def switch_lamp {n : ℕ} (i : fin (n+n)) (s1 : lamp_state n) : lamp_state n
:= s1.write i (¬s1.read i)
-- := ⟨λ j : fin (n+n), xor (i = j) (s1.read j)⟩
def fin_state {n k : ℕ} (seq : lamp_switch_seq n k) : lamp_state n
:= seq.foldl (ini_state n) switch_lamp
def is_N_seq {n k : ℕ} (seq : lamp_switch_seq n k) : Prop
:= (fin_state seq = target_state n)
def is_M_seq {n k : ℕ} (seq : lamp_switch_seq n k) : Prop
:= is_N_seq seq ∧ ∀ l ∈ seq, (l : ℕ) < n
def N_seq (n k : ℕ) := @subtype (lamp_switch_seq n k) is_N_seq
def M_seq (n k : ℕ) := @subtype (lamp_switch_seq n k) is_M_seq
instance (n k : ℕ) : fintype (N_seq n k) := by apply subtype.fintype
instance (n k : ℕ) : fintype (M_seq n k) := by apply subtype.fintype
def N_num (n k : ℕ) := fintype.card (N_seq n k)
def M_num (n k : ℕ) := fintype.card (M_seq n k)
/- The statement of the theorem -/
def lamp_prop : Prop :=
∀ n k : ℕ, 0 < n → n ≤ k → nat.even (k-n) →
(N_num n k : ℚ) / (M_num n k) = 2^(k-n)
/- Proof -/
def to_fin_2n_small {n : ℕ} (i : fin n) : fin (n+n)
:= ⟨i, nat.lt_add_left i.val n n i.is_lt⟩
def to_fin_2n_big {n : ℕ} (i : fin n) : fin (n+n)
:= ⟨i+n, add_lt_add_right i.is_lt n⟩
def is_D_seq {n k : ℕ} (seq : lamp_switch_seq n k) : Prop
:=
let fs := fin_state seq in
∀ i : fin n, xor (fs.read (to_fin_2n_small i)) (fs.read (to_fin_2n_big i))
def D_seq (n k : ℕ) := @subtype (lamp_switch_seq n k) is_D_seq
instance (n k : ℕ) : fintype (D_seq n k) := by apply subtype.fintype
def D_num (n k : ℕ) := fintype.card (D_seq n k)
lemma N_num_by_D_num (n k : ℕ) : (N_num n k) * 2^n = (D_num n k)
:=
begin
sorry
end
lemma M_num_by_D_num (n k : ℕ) : (M_num n k) * 2^k = (D_num n k)
:=
begin
sorry
end
-- proving that M ≠ 0
def nontriv_val_small {n k : ℕ} {i : fin k} (c : i.val < n) : fin (n+n) :=
⟨i, nat.lt_add_left i.val n n c⟩
def nontriv_val_big {n k : ℕ} {i : fin k} (n_pos : 0 < n) (c : ¬i.val < n) : fin (n+n) :=
⟨0, nat.lt_add_left 0 n n n_pos⟩
def nontriv_seq (n k : ℕ) (n_pos : 0 < n) : lamp_switch_seq n k :=
⟨λ i : fin k,
dite (i.val < n)
nontriv_val_small
(nontriv_val_big n_pos)
⟩
lemma nontriv_correct (n k : ℕ) (n_pos : 0 < n) (nk_lt : n ≤ k) (nk_parity : nat.even (k-n))
: is_N_seq (nontriv_seq n k n_pos)
:=
begin
sorry
end
lemma nontriv_all_small (n k : ℕ) (n_pos : 0 < n)
: ∀ l ∈ (nontriv_seq n k n_pos), ↑l < n
:=
begin
let seq := nontriv_seq n k n_pos,
show ∀ l ∈ seq, ↑l < n,
intros,
obtain ⟨si, hs⟩ : ∃ si, seq.data si = l, from H,
rw ←hs,
cases classical.em (si.val < n) with si_small si_big,
-- si_small
have : seq.data si = nontriv_val_small si_small, from dif_pos si_small,
rw this,
show si.val < n, from si_small,
-- si_big
have : seq.data si = nontriv_val_big n_pos si_big, from dif_neg si_big,
rw this,
show 0 < n, from n_pos,
end
lemma fintype.card_pos (α : Type) [ft : fintype α] (x : α)
: 0 < fintype.card α
:= begin
apply finset.card_pos.2,
apply exists.intro,
show α, from x,
show x ∈ finset.univ, from finset.mem_univ x
end
lemma M_num_nontriv {n k : ℕ} (n_pos : 0 < n) (nk_le : n ≤ k) (nk_parity : nat.even (k-n))
: M_num n k > 0
:=
begin
let seq : lamp_switch_seq n k := (nontriv_seq n k n_pos),
have : is_M_seq seq, begin
apply and.intro,
show is_N_seq seq, begin
apply nontriv_correct,
show n ≤ k, from nk_le,
show nat.even (k-n), from nk_parity,
end,
show ∀ l ∈ seq, ↑l < n, by apply nontriv_all_small,
end,
apply fintype.card_pos,
show M_seq n k, from ⟨seq, this⟩
end
-- final arithmetics
lemma lamp_arith (M N D n k : ℕ) (h1 : N * 2^n = D) (h2 : M * 2^k = D)
(non_triv : M > 0) (nk_le : n ≤ k) :
(N / M : ℚ) = 2^(k-n) :=
begin
rw div_eq_iff_mul_eq,
rw ← domain.mul_left_inj (ne_of_gt $ pow_pos two_pos n : (2^n : ℚ) ≠ 0),
rw [← mul_assoc, ← pow_add, nat.add_sub_cancel' nk_le],
rw mul_comm at h1 h2,
exact_mod_cast h2.trans h1.symm,
exact_mod_cast ne_of_gt non_triv
end
/- Proof of the main theorem -/
theorem lamp_thm : lamp_prop
:= begin
show ∀ n k : ℕ, 0 < n → n ≤ k → nat.even (k-n) →
(N_num n k : ℚ) / (M_num n k) = 2^(k-n),
intros n k n_pos nk_le nk_parity,
apply lamp_arith,
show N_num n k * 2^n = D_num n k, by apply N_num_by_D_num,
show M_num n k * 2^k = D_num n k, by apply M_num_by_D_num,
show M_num n k > 0, from M_num_nontriv n_pos nk_le nk_parity,
show n ≤ k, from nk_le,
end
|
ffd860d4d6767496339160b589b7e08407438c69 | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/analysis/normed_space/star/complex.lean | 512dd0d99440f063d5fa04543ebb52107a8db948 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,446 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Frédéric Dupuis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import analysis.normed_space.star.basic
import algebra.star.module
import analysis.complex.basic
/-!
# Complex normed star modules and algebras
Facts about star modules and star algebras over the complex numbers.
## Main definitions
* `star_module.mul_neg_I_lin`: multiplication by -I as a real-linear equivalence between the
skew-adjoint and self-adjoint elements of a star module.
* `star_module.im`: the imaginary part of an element of a star module, defined via
`skew_adjoint_part`.
-/
variables {E : Type*}
namespace star_module
open_locale complex_conjugate
open complex
variables [add_comm_group E] [star_add_monoid E] [module ℂ E] [star_module ℂ E]
/-- Multiplication by -I as a real-linear equivalence between the skew-adjoint and self-adjoint
elements of a star module. -/
@[simps] def mul_neg_I_lin : skew_adjoint E ≃ₗ[ℝ] self_adjoint E :=
{ to_fun := λ x, ⟨-I • x, by simp [self_adjoint.mem_iff]⟩,
inv_fun := λ x, ⟨I • x, by simp [skew_adjoint.mem_iff]⟩,
map_add' := λ x y, by { ext, simp only [add_subgroup.coe_add, smul_add, add_subgroup.coe_mk] },
map_smul' := λ r x, by { ext, simp only [neg_smul, neg_inj, skew_adjoint.coe_smul,
add_subgroup.coe_mk, ring_hom.id_apply, self_adjoint.coe_smul, smul_neg, smul_comm I], },
left_inv := λ x, by simp only [neg_smul, add_subgroup.coe_mk, smul_neg, ←mul_smul, I_mul_I,
neg_neg, one_smul, set_like.eta],
right_inv := λ x, by simp only [←mul_smul, I_mul_I, add_subgroup.coe_mk, neg_mul, neg_neg,
one_smul, set_like.eta] }
/-- The imaginary part of an element of a star module, as a real-linear map. -/
@[simps] noncomputable def im : E →ₗ[ℝ] self_adjoint E :=
mul_neg_I_lin.to_linear_map.comp (skew_adjoint_part ℝ)
/-- The real part of an element of a star module, as a real-linear map. This is simply an
abbreviation for `self_adjoint_part ℝ`. -/
@[simps] noncomputable abbreviation re : E →ₗ[ℝ] self_adjoint E := self_adjoint_part ℝ
/-- An element of a complex star module can be decomposed into self-adjoint "real" and
"imaginary" parts -/
lemma re_add_im (x : E) : (re x : E) + I • im x = x :=
by simp [←mul_smul, I_mul_I, ←smul_add, ←two_smul ℝ]
end star_module
|
340df8c7a5b2f4c8ee2f1675f25ce3392c69dba0 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/order/category/omega_complete_partial_order.lean | cd733cbbb7e2ea8bd7f8193fb47f68a74d147e7d | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,934 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.order.omega_complete_partial_order
import Mathlib.order.category.Preorder
import Mathlib.category_theory.limits.shapes.products
import Mathlib.category_theory.limits.shapes.equalizers
import Mathlib.category_theory.limits.constructions.limits_of_products_and_equalizers
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes u u_1 v u_2
namespace Mathlib
/-!
# Category of types with a omega complete partial order
In this file, we bundle the class `omega_complete_partial_order` into a
concrete category and prove that continuous functions also form
a `omega_complete_partial_order`.
## Main definitions
* `ωCPO`
* an instance of `category` and `concrete_category`
-/
/-- The category of types with a omega complete partial order. -/
def ωCPO :=
category_theory.bundled omega_complete_partial_order
namespace ωCPO
protected instance omega_complete_partial_order.continuous_hom.category_theory.bundled_hom : category_theory.bundled_hom omega_complete_partial_order.continuous_hom :=
category_theory.bundled_hom.mk omega_complete_partial_order.continuous_hom.to_fun
omega_complete_partial_order.continuous_hom.id omega_complete_partial_order.continuous_hom.comp
protected instance large_category : category_theory.large_category ωCPO :=
category_theory.bundled_hom.category omega_complete_partial_order.continuous_hom
/-- Construct a bundled ωCPO from the underlying type and typeclass. -/
def of (α : Type u_1) [omega_complete_partial_order α] : ωCPO :=
category_theory.bundled.of α
protected instance inhabited : Inhabited ωCPO :=
{ default := of PUnit }
protected instance omega_complete_partial_order (α : ωCPO) : omega_complete_partial_order ↥α :=
category_theory.bundled.str α
namespace has_products
/-- The pi-type gives a cone for a product. -/
def product {J : Type v} (f : J → ωCPO) : category_theory.limits.fan f :=
category_theory.limits.fan.mk (of ((j : J) → ↥(f j)))
fun (j : J) => omega_complete_partial_order.continuous_hom.of_mono (pi.monotone_apply j) sorry
/-- The pi-type is a limit cone for the product. -/
def is_product (J : Type v) (f : J → ωCPO) : category_theory.limits.is_limit (product f) :=
category_theory.limits.is_limit.mk
fun (s : category_theory.limits.cone (category_theory.discrete.functor f)) =>
omega_complete_partial_order.continuous_hom.mk
(fun (t : ↥(category_theory.limits.cone.X s)) (j : J) =>
coe_fn (category_theory.nat_trans.app (category_theory.limits.cone.π s) j) t)
sorry sorry
protected instance category_theory.limits.has_product (J : Type v) (f : J → ωCPO) : category_theory.limits.has_product f :=
category_theory.limits.has_limit.mk (category_theory.limits.limit_cone.mk (product f) (is_product J f))
end has_products
protected instance omega_complete_partial_order_equalizer {α : Type u_1} {β : Type u_2} [omega_complete_partial_order α] [omega_complete_partial_order β] (f : α →𝒄 β) (g : α →𝒄 β) : omega_complete_partial_order (Subtype fun (a : α) => coe_fn f a = coe_fn g a) :=
omega_complete_partial_order.subtype (fun (a : α) => coe_fn f a = coe_fn g a) sorry
namespace has_equalizers
/-- The equalizer inclusion function as a `continuous_hom`. -/
def equalizer_ι {α : Type u_1} {β : Type u_2} [omega_complete_partial_order α] [omega_complete_partial_order β] (f : α →𝒄 β) (g : α →𝒄 β) : (Subtype fun (a : α) => coe_fn f a = coe_fn g a) →𝒄 α :=
omega_complete_partial_order.continuous_hom.of_mono (preorder_hom.subtype.val fun (a : α) => coe_fn f a = coe_fn g a)
sorry
/-- A construction of the equalizer fork. -/
def equalizer {X : ωCPO} {Y : ωCPO} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Y) : category_theory.limits.fork f g :=
category_theory.limits.fork.of_ι (equalizer_ι f g) sorry
/-- The equalizer fork is a limit. -/
def is_equalizer {X : ωCPO} {Y : ωCPO} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Y) : category_theory.limits.is_limit (equalizer f g) :=
category_theory.limits.fork.is_limit.mk' (equalizer f g)
fun (s : category_theory.limits.fork f g) =>
{ val :=
omega_complete_partial_order.continuous_hom.mk
(fun
(x :
↥(category_theory.functor.obj
(category_theory.functor.obj
(category_theory.functor.const category_theory.limits.walking_parallel_pair)
(category_theory.limits.cone.X s))
category_theory.limits.walking_parallel_pair.zero)) =>
{ val := coe_fn (category_theory.limits.fork.ι s) x, property := sorry })
sorry sorry,
property := sorry }
end has_equalizers
protected instance category_theory.limits.has_products : category_theory.limits.has_products ωCPO :=
fun (J : Type v) =>
category_theory.limits.has_limits_of_shape.mk
fun (F : category_theory.discrete J ⥤ ωCPO) =>
category_theory.limits.has_limit_of_iso (category_theory.iso.symm category_theory.discrete.nat_iso_functor)
protected instance category_theory.limits.parallel_pair.category_theory.limits.has_limit {X : ωCPO} {Y : ωCPO} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Y) : category_theory.limits.has_limit (category_theory.limits.parallel_pair f g) :=
category_theory.limits.has_limit.mk
(category_theory.limits.limit_cone.mk (has_equalizers.equalizer f g) (has_equalizers.is_equalizer f g))
protected instance category_theory.limits.has_equalizers : category_theory.limits.has_equalizers ωCPO :=
category_theory.limits.has_equalizers_of_has_limit_parallel_pair ωCPO
protected instance category_theory.limits.has_limits : category_theory.limits.has_limits ωCPO :=
category_theory.limits.limits_from_equalizers_and_products
|
76caf0a1920a29b5240bc22e8c776046a63fb085 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/analysis/asymptotics/asymptotic_equivalent.lean | e0dc4078fc0e500828469a5512f6b1ebaac41811 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,588 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker
-/
import analysis.asymptotics.asymptotics
import analysis.normed.order.basic
/-!
# Asymptotic equivalence
In this file, we define the relation `is_equivalent l u v`, which means that `u-v` is little o of
`v` along the filter `l`.
Unlike `is_[oO]` relations, this one requires `u` and `v` to have the same codomain `β`. While the
definition only requires `β` to be a `normed_add_comm_group`, most interesting properties require it
to be a `normed_field`.
## Notations
We introduce the notation `u ~[l] v := is_equivalent l u v`, which you can use by opening the
`asymptotics` locale.
## Main results
If `β` is a `normed_add_comm_group` :
- `_ ~[l] _` is an equivalence relation
- Equivalent statements for `u ~[l] const _ c` :
- If `c ≠ 0`, this is true iff `tendsto u l (𝓝 c)` (see `is_equivalent_const_iff_tendsto`)
- For `c = 0`, this is true iff `u =ᶠ[l] 0` (see `is_equivalent_zero_iff_eventually_zero`)
If `β` is a `normed_field` :
- Alternative characterization of the relation (see `is_equivalent_iff_exists_eq_mul`) :
`u ~[l] v ↔ ∃ (φ : α → β) (hφ : tendsto φ l (𝓝 1)), u =ᶠ[l] φ * v`
- Provided some non-vanishing hypothesis, this can be seen as `u ~[l] v ↔ tendsto (u/v) l (𝓝 1)`
(see `is_equivalent_iff_tendsto_one`)
- For any constant `c`, `u ~[l] v` implies `tendsto u l (𝓝 c) ↔ tendsto v l (𝓝 c)`
(see `is_equivalent.tendsto_nhds_iff`)
- `*` and `/` are compatible with `_ ~[l] _` (see `is_equivalent.mul` and `is_equivalent.div`)
If `β` is a `normed_linear_ordered_field` :
- If `u ~[l] v`, we have `tendsto u l at_top ↔ tendsto v l at_top`
(see `is_equivalent.tendsto_at_top_iff`)
## Implementation Notes
Note that `is_equivalent` takes the parameters `(l : filter α) (u v : α → β)` in that order.
This is to enable `calc` support, as `calc` requires that the last two explicit arguments are `u v`.
-/
namespace asymptotics
open filter function
open_locale topological_space
section normed_add_comm_group
variables {α β : Type*} [normed_add_comm_group β]
/-- Two functions `u` and `v` are said to be asymptotically equivalent along a filter `l` when
`u x - v x = o(v x)` as x converges along `l`. -/
def is_equivalent (l : filter α) (u v : α → β) := (u - v) =o[l] v
localized "notation (name := asymptotics.is_equivalent)
u ` ~[`:50 l:50 `] `:0 v:50 := asymptotics.is_equivalent l u v" in asymptotics
variables {u v w : α → β} {l : filter α}
lemma is_equivalent.is_o (h : u ~[l] v) : (u - v) =o[l] v := h
lemma is_equivalent.is_O (h : u ~[l] v) : u =O[l] v :=
(is_O.congr_of_sub h.is_O.symm).mp (is_O_refl _ _)
lemma is_equivalent.is_O_symm (h : u ~[l] v) : v =O[l] u :=
begin
convert h.is_o.right_is_O_add,
ext,
simp
end
@[refl] lemma is_equivalent.refl : u ~[l] u :=
begin
rw [is_equivalent, sub_self],
exact is_o_zero _ _
end
@[symm] lemma is_equivalent.symm (h : u ~[l] v) : v ~[l] u :=
(h.is_o.trans_is_O h.is_O_symm).symm
@[trans] lemma is_equivalent.trans {l : filter α} {u v w : α → β}
(huv : u ~[l] v) (hvw : v ~[l] w) : u ~[l] w :=
(huv.is_o.trans_is_O hvw.is_O).triangle hvw.is_o
lemma is_equivalent.congr_left {u v w : α → β} {l : filter α} (huv : u ~[l] v)
(huw : u =ᶠ[l] w) : w ~[l] v :=
huv.congr' (huw.sub (eventually_eq.refl _ _)) (eventually_eq.refl _ _)
lemma is_equivalent.congr_right {u v w : α → β} {l : filter α} (huv : u ~[l] v)
(hvw : v =ᶠ[l] w) : u ~[l] w :=
(huv.symm.congr_left hvw).symm
lemma is_equivalent_zero_iff_eventually_zero : u ~[l] 0 ↔ u =ᶠ[l] 0 :=
begin
rw [is_equivalent, sub_zero],
exact is_o_zero_right_iff
end
lemma is_equivalent_zero_iff_is_O_zero : u ~[l] 0 ↔ u =O[l] (0 : α → β) :=
begin
refine ⟨is_equivalent.is_O, λ h, _⟩,
rw [is_equivalent_zero_iff_eventually_zero, eventually_eq_iff_exists_mem],
exact ⟨{x : α | u x = 0}, is_O_zero_right_iff.mp h, λ x hx, hx⟩,
end
lemma is_equivalent_const_iff_tendsto {c : β} (h : c ≠ 0) : u ~[l] const _ c ↔ tendsto u l (𝓝 c) :=
begin
rw [is_equivalent, is_o_const_iff h],
split; intro h;
[ { have := h.sub tendsto_const_nhds, rw zero_sub (-c) at this },
{ have := h.sub tendsto_const_nhds, rw ← sub_self c} ];
convert this; try { ext }; simp
end
lemma is_equivalent.tendsto_const {c : β} (hu : u ~[l] const _ c) : tendsto u l (𝓝 c) :=
begin
rcases (em $ c = 0) with ⟨rfl, h⟩,
{ exact (tendsto_congr' $ is_equivalent_zero_iff_eventually_zero.mp hu).mpr tendsto_const_nhds },
{ exact (is_equivalent_const_iff_tendsto h).mp hu }
end
lemma is_equivalent.tendsto_nhds {c : β} (huv : u ~[l] v) (hu : tendsto u l (𝓝 c)) :
tendsto v l (𝓝 c) :=
begin
by_cases h : c = 0,
{ subst c, rw ← is_o_one_iff ℝ at hu ⊢,
simpa using (huv.symm.is_o.trans hu).add hu },
{ rw ← is_equivalent_const_iff_tendsto h at hu ⊢,
exact huv.symm.trans hu }
end
lemma is_equivalent.tendsto_nhds_iff {c : β} (huv : u ~[l] v) :
tendsto u l (𝓝 c) ↔ tendsto v l (𝓝 c) := ⟨huv.tendsto_nhds, huv.symm.tendsto_nhds⟩
lemma is_equivalent.add_is_o (huv : u ~[l] v) (hwv : w =o[l] v) : (u + w) ~[l] v :=
by simpa only [is_equivalent, add_sub_right_comm] using huv.add hwv
lemma is_equivalent.sub_is_o (huv : u ~[l] v) (hwv : w =o[l] v) : (u - w) ~[l] v :=
by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using huv.add_is_o hwv.neg_left
lemma is_o.add_is_equivalent (hu : u =o[l] w) (hv : v ~[l] w) : (u + v) ~[l] w :=
add_comm v u ▸ hv.add_is_o hu
lemma is_o.is_equivalent (huv : (u - v) =o[l] v) : u ~[l] v := huv
lemma is_equivalent.neg (huv : u ~[l] v) : (λ x, - u x) ~[l] (λ x, - v x) :=
begin
rw is_equivalent,
convert huv.is_o.neg_left.neg_right,
ext,
simp,
end
end normed_add_comm_group
open_locale asymptotics
section normed_field
variables {α β : Type*} [normed_field β] {t u v w : α → β} {l : filter α}
lemma is_equivalent_iff_exists_eq_mul : u ~[l] v ↔
∃ (φ : α → β) (hφ : tendsto φ l (𝓝 1)), u =ᶠ[l] φ * v :=
begin
rw [is_equivalent, is_o_iff_exists_eq_mul],
split; rintros ⟨φ, hφ, h⟩; [use (φ + 1), use (φ - 1)]; split,
{ conv in (𝓝 _) { rw ← zero_add (1 : β) },
exact hφ.add (tendsto_const_nhds) },
{ convert h.add (eventually_eq.refl l v); ext; simp [add_mul] },
{ conv in (𝓝 _) { rw ← sub_self (1 : β) },
exact hφ.sub (tendsto_const_nhds) },
{ convert h.sub (eventually_eq.refl l v); ext; simp [sub_mul] }
end
lemma is_equivalent.exists_eq_mul (huv : u ~[l] v) :
∃ (φ : α → β) (hφ : tendsto φ l (𝓝 1)), u =ᶠ[l] φ * v :=
is_equivalent_iff_exists_eq_mul.mp huv
lemma is_equivalent_of_tendsto_one (hz : ∀ᶠ x in l, v x = 0 → u x = 0)
(huv : tendsto (u/v) l (𝓝 1)) : u ~[l] v :=
begin
rw is_equivalent_iff_exists_eq_mul,
refine ⟨u/v, huv, hz.mono $ λ x hz', (div_mul_cancel_of_imp hz').symm⟩,
end
lemma is_equivalent_of_tendsto_one' (hz : ∀ x, v x = 0 → u x = 0) (huv : tendsto (u/v) l (𝓝 1)) :
u ~[l] v :=
is_equivalent_of_tendsto_one (eventually_of_forall hz) huv
lemma is_equivalent_iff_tendsto_one (hz : ∀ᶠ x in l, v x ≠ 0) :
u ~[l] v ↔ tendsto (u/v) l (𝓝 1) :=
begin
split,
{ intro hequiv,
have := hequiv.is_o.tendsto_div_nhds_zero,
simp only [pi.sub_apply, sub_div] at this,
have key : tendsto (λ x, v x / v x) l (𝓝 1),
{ exact (tendsto_congr' $ hz.mono $ λ x hnz, @div_self _ _ (v x) hnz).mpr tendsto_const_nhds },
convert this.add key,
{ ext, simp },
{ norm_num } },
{ exact is_equivalent_of_tendsto_one (hz.mono $ λ x hnvz hz, (hnvz hz).elim) }
end
end normed_field
section smul
lemma is_equivalent.smul {α E 𝕜 : Type*} [normed_field 𝕜] [normed_add_comm_group E]
[normed_space 𝕜 E] {a b : α → 𝕜} {u v : α → E} {l : filter α} (hab : a ~[l] b) (huv : u ~[l] v) :
(λ x, a x • u x) ~[l] (λ x, b x • v x) :=
begin
rcases hab.exists_eq_mul with ⟨φ, hφ, habφ⟩,
have : (λ (x : α), a x • u x) - (λ (x : α), b x • v x) =ᶠ[l] λ x, b x • ((φ x • u x) - v x),
{ convert (habφ.comp₂ (•) $ eventually_eq.refl _ u).sub (eventually_eq.refl _ (λ x, b x • v x)),
ext,
rw [pi.mul_apply, mul_comm, mul_smul, ← smul_sub] },
refine (is_o_congr this.symm $ eventually_eq.rfl).mp ((is_O_refl b l).smul_is_o _),
rcases huv.is_O.exists_pos with ⟨C, hC, hCuv⟩,
rw is_equivalent at *,
rw is_o_iff at *,
rw is_O_with at hCuv,
simp only [metric.tendsto_nhds, dist_eq_norm] at hφ,
intros c hc,
specialize hφ ((c/2)/C) (div_pos (by linarith) hC),
specialize huv (show 0 < c/2, by linarith),
refine hφ.mp (huv.mp $ hCuv.mono $ λ x hCuvx huvx hφx, _),
have key :=
calc ‖φ x - 1‖ * ‖u x‖
≤ (c/2) / C * ‖u x‖ : mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hφx.le (norm_nonneg $ u x)
... ≤ (c/2) / C * (C*‖v x‖) : mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hCuvx (div_pos (by linarith) hC).le
... = c/2 * ‖v x‖ : by {field_simp [hC.ne.symm], ring},
calc ‖((λ (x : α), φ x • u x) - v) x‖
= ‖(φ x - 1) • u x + (u x - v x)‖ : by simp [sub_smul, sub_add]
... ≤ ‖(φ x - 1) • u x‖ + ‖u x - v x‖ : norm_add_le _ _
... = ‖φ x - 1‖ * ‖u x‖ + ‖u x - v x‖ : by rw norm_smul
... ≤ c / 2 * ‖v x‖ + ‖u x - v x‖ : add_le_add_right key _
... ≤ c / 2 * ‖v x‖ + c / 2 * ‖v x‖ : add_le_add_left huvx _
... = c * ‖v x‖ : by ring,
end
end smul
section mul_inv
variables {α β : Type*} [normed_field β] {t u v w : α → β} {l : filter α}
lemma is_equivalent.mul (htu : t ~[l] u) (hvw : v ~[l] w) : t * v ~[l] u * w :=
htu.smul hvw
lemma is_equivalent.inv (huv : u ~[l] v) : (λ x, (u x)⁻¹) ~[l] (λ x, (v x)⁻¹) :=
begin
rw is_equivalent_iff_exists_eq_mul at *,
rcases huv with ⟨φ, hφ, h⟩,
rw ← inv_one,
refine ⟨λ x, (φ x)⁻¹, tendsto.inv₀ hφ (by norm_num) , _⟩,
convert h.inv,
ext,
simp [mul_inv]
end
lemma is_equivalent.div (htu : t ~[l] u) (hvw : v ~[l] w) :
(λ x, t x / v x) ~[l] (λ x, u x / w x) :=
by simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using htu.mul hvw.inv
end mul_inv
section normed_linear_ordered_field
variables {α β : Type*} [normed_linear_ordered_field β] {u v : α → β} {l : filter α}
lemma is_equivalent.tendsto_at_top [order_topology β] (huv : u ~[l] v) (hu : tendsto u l at_top) :
tendsto v l at_top :=
let ⟨φ, hφ, h⟩ := huv.symm.exists_eq_mul in
tendsto.congr' h.symm ((mul_comm u φ) ▸ (hu.at_top_mul zero_lt_one hφ))
lemma is_equivalent.tendsto_at_top_iff [order_topology β] (huv : u ~[l] v) :
tendsto u l at_top ↔ tendsto v l at_top := ⟨huv.tendsto_at_top, huv.symm.tendsto_at_top⟩
lemma is_equivalent.tendsto_at_bot [order_topology β] (huv : u ~[l] v) (hu : tendsto u l at_bot) :
tendsto v l at_bot :=
begin
convert tendsto_neg_at_top_at_bot.comp
(huv.neg.tendsto_at_top $ tendsto_neg_at_bot_at_top.comp hu),
ext,
simp
end
lemma is_equivalent.tendsto_at_bot_iff [order_topology β] (huv : u ~[l] v) :
tendsto u l at_bot ↔ tendsto v l at_bot := ⟨huv.tendsto_at_bot, huv.symm.tendsto_at_bot⟩
end normed_linear_ordered_field
end asymptotics
open filter asymptotics
open_locale asymptotics
variables {α β : Type*} [normed_add_comm_group β]
lemma filter.eventually_eq.is_equivalent {u v : α → β} {l : filter α} (h : u =ᶠ[l] v) : u ~[l] v :=
is_equivalent.congr_right (is_o_refl_left _ _) h
|
f4a67bd8c0f84cb26fcf89a7213584178465a3ee | 8d65764a9e5f0923a67fc435eb1a5a1d02fd80e3 | /src/data/part.lean | deb48d93a9278b82ca98ebedb9a4ea6029d5d7df | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | troyjlee/mathlib | e18d4b8026e32062ab9e89bc3b003a5d1cfec3f5 | 45e7eb8447555247246e3fe91c87066506c14875 | refs/heads/master | 1,689,248,035,046 | 1,629,470,528,000 | 1,629,470,528,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,104 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Jeremy Avigad, Simon Hudon
-/
import data.equiv.basic
/-!
# Partial values of a type
-/
/-- `part α` is the type of "partial values" of type `α`. It
is similar to `option α` except the domain condition can be an
arbitrary proposition, not necessarily decidable. -/
structure {u} part (α : Type u) : Type u :=
(dom : Prop)
(get : dom → α)
namespace part
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
/-- Convert a `part α` with a decidable domain to an option -/
def to_option (o : part α) [decidable o.dom] : option α :=
if h : dom o then some (o.get h) else none
/-- `part` extensionality -/
theorem ext' : ∀ {o p : part α}
(H1 : o.dom ↔ p.dom)
(H2 : ∀h₁ h₂, o.get h₁ = p.get h₂), o = p
| ⟨od, o⟩ ⟨pd, p⟩ H1 H2 := have t : od = pd, from propext H1,
by cases t; rw [show o = p, from funext $ λp, H2 p p]
/-- `part` eta expansion -/
@[simp] theorem eta : Π (o : part α), (⟨o.dom, λ h, o.get h⟩ : part α) = o
| ⟨h, f⟩ := rfl
/-- `a ∈ o` means that `o` is defined and equal to `a` -/
protected def mem (a : α) (o : part α) : Prop := ∃ h, o.get h = a
instance : has_mem α (part α) := ⟨part.mem⟩
theorem mem_eq (a : α) (o : part α) : (a ∈ o) = (∃ h, o.get h = a) :=
rfl
theorem dom_iff_mem : ∀ {o : part α}, o.dom ↔ ∃y, y ∈ o
| ⟨p, f⟩ := ⟨λh, ⟨f h, h, rfl⟩, λ⟨_, h, rfl⟩, h⟩
theorem get_mem {o : part α} (h) : get o h ∈ o := ⟨_, rfl⟩
/-- `part` extensionality -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {o p : part α} (H : ∀ a, a ∈ o ↔ a ∈ p) : o = p :=
ext' ⟨λ h, ((H _).1 ⟨h, rfl⟩).fst,
λ h, ((H _).2 ⟨h, rfl⟩).fst⟩ $
λ a b, ((H _).2 ⟨_, rfl⟩).snd
/-- The `none` value in `part` has a `false` domain and an empty function. -/
def none : part α := ⟨false, false.rec _⟩
instance : inhabited (part α) := ⟨none⟩
@[simp] theorem not_mem_none (a : α) : a ∉ @none α := λ h, h.fst
/-- The `some a` value in `part` has a `true` domain and the
function returns `a`. -/
def some (a : α) : part α := ⟨true, λ_, a⟩
theorem mem_unique : ∀ {a b : α} {o : part α}, a ∈ o → b ∈ o → a = b
| _ _ ⟨p, f⟩ ⟨h₁, rfl⟩ ⟨h₂, rfl⟩ := rfl
theorem mem.left_unique : relator.left_unique ((∈) : α → part α → Prop) :=
⟨λ a o b, mem_unique⟩
theorem get_eq_of_mem {o : part α} {a} (h : a ∈ o) (h') : get o h' = a :=
mem_unique ⟨_, rfl⟩ h
@[simp] theorem get_some {a : α} (ha : (some a).dom) : get (some a) ha = a := rfl
theorem mem_some (a : α) : a ∈ some a := ⟨trivial, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_some_iff {a b} : b ∈ (some a : part α) ↔ b = a :=
⟨λ⟨h, e⟩, e.symm, λ e, ⟨trivial, e.symm⟩⟩
theorem eq_some_iff {a : α} {o : part α} : o = some a ↔ a ∈ o :=
⟨λ e, e.symm ▸ mem_some _,
λ ⟨h, e⟩, e ▸ ext' (iff_true_intro h) (λ _ _, rfl)⟩
theorem eq_none_iff {o : part α} : o = none ↔ ∀ a, a ∉ o :=
⟨λ e, e.symm ▸ not_mem_none,
λ h, ext (by simpa [not_mem_none])⟩
theorem eq_none_iff' {o : part α} : o = none ↔ ¬ o.dom :=
⟨λ e, e.symm ▸ id, λ h, eq_none_iff.2 (λ a h', h h'.fst)⟩
lemma some_ne_none (x : α) : some x ≠ none :=
by { intro h, change none.dom, rw [← h], trivial }
lemma ne_none_iff {o : part α} : o ≠ none ↔ ∃x, o = some x :=
begin
split,
{ rw [ne, eq_none_iff], intro h, push_neg at h, cases h with x hx, use x, rwa [eq_some_iff] },
{ rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩, apply some_ne_none }
end
lemma eq_none_or_eq_some (o : part α) : o = none ∨ ∃ x, o = some x :=
begin
classical,
by_cases h : o.dom,
{ rw dom_iff_mem at h, right,
apply exists_imp_exists _ h,
simp [eq_some_iff] },
{ rw eq_none_iff', exact or.inl h },
end
@[simp] lemma some_inj {a b : α} : part.some a = some b ↔ a = b :=
function.injective.eq_iff (λ a b h, congr_fun (eq_of_heq (part.mk.inj h).2) trivial)
@[simp] lemma some_get {a : part α} (ha : a.dom) :
part.some (part.get a ha) = a :=
eq.symm (eq_some_iff.2 ⟨ha, rfl⟩)
lemma get_eq_iff_eq_some {a : part α} {ha : a.dom} {b : α} :
a.get ha = b ↔ a = some b :=
⟨λ h, by simp [h.symm], λ h, by simp [h]⟩
lemma get_eq_get_of_eq (a : part α) (ha : a.dom) {b : part α} (h : a = b) :
a.get ha = b.get (h ▸ ha) :=
by { congr, exact h }
instance none_decidable : decidable (@none α).dom := decidable.false
instance some_decidable (a : α) : decidable (some a).dom := decidable.true
/-- Retrieves the value of `a : part α` if it exists, and return the provided default value
otherwise. -/
def get_or_else (a : part α) [decidable a.dom] (d : α) :=
if ha : a.dom then a.get ha else d
@[simp] lemma get_or_else_none (d : α) : get_or_else none d = d :=
dif_neg id
@[simp] lemma get_or_else_some (a : α) (d : α) : get_or_else (some a) d = a :=
dif_pos trivial
@[simp] theorem mem_to_option {o : part α} [decidable o.dom] {a : α} :
a ∈ to_option o ↔ a ∈ o :=
begin
unfold to_option,
by_cases h : o.dom; simp [h],
{ exact ⟨λ h, ⟨_, h⟩, λ ⟨_, h⟩, h⟩ },
{ exact mt Exists.fst h }
end
/-- Converts an `option α` into a `part α`. -/
def of_option : option α → part α
| option.none := none
| (option.some a) := some a
@[simp] theorem mem_of_option {a : α} : ∀ {o : option α}, a ∈ of_option o ↔ a ∈ o
| option.none := ⟨λ h, h.fst.elim, λ h, option.no_confusion h⟩
| (option.some b) := ⟨λ h, congr_arg option.some h.snd,
λ h, ⟨trivial, option.some.inj h⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem of_option_dom {α} : ∀ (o : option α), (of_option o).dom ↔ o.is_some
| option.none := by simp [of_option, none]
| (option.some a) := by simp [of_option]
theorem of_option_eq_get {α} (o : option α) : of_option o = ⟨_, @option.get _ o⟩ :=
part.ext' (of_option_dom o) $ λ h₁ h₂, by cases o; [cases h₁, refl]
instance : has_coe (option α) (part α) := ⟨of_option⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_coe {a : α} {o : option α} :
a ∈ (o : part α) ↔ a ∈ o := mem_of_option
@[simp] theorem coe_none : (@option.none α : part α) = none := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_some (a : α) : (option.some a : part α) = some a := rfl
@[elab_as_eliminator] protected lemma induction_on {P : part α → Prop}
(a : part α) (hnone : P none) (hsome : ∀ a : α, P (some a)) : P a :=
(classical.em a.dom).elim
(λ h, part.some_get h ▸ hsome _)
(λ h, (eq_none_iff'.2 h).symm ▸ hnone)
instance of_option_decidable : ∀ o : option α, decidable (of_option o).dom
| option.none := part.none_decidable
| (option.some a) := part.some_decidable a
@[simp] theorem to_of_option (o : option α) : to_option (of_option o) = o :=
by cases o; refl
@[simp] theorem of_to_option (o : part α) [decidable o.dom] : of_option (to_option o) = o :=
ext $ λ a, mem_of_option.trans mem_to_option
/-- `part α` is (classically) equivalent to `option α`. -/
noncomputable def equiv_option : part α ≃ option α :=
by haveI := classical.dec; exact
⟨λ o, to_option o, of_option, λ o, of_to_option o,
λ o, eq.trans (by dsimp; congr) (to_of_option o)⟩
/-- We give `part α` the order where everything is greater than `none`. -/
instance : order_bot (part α) :=
{ le := λ x y, ∀ i, i ∈ x → i ∈ y,
le_refl := λ x y, id,
le_trans := λ x y z f g i, g _ ∘ f _,
le_antisymm := λ x y f g, part.ext $ λ z, ⟨f _, g _⟩,
bot := none,
bot_le := by { introv x, rintro ⟨⟨_⟩,_⟩, } }
instance : preorder (part α) :=
by apply_instance
lemma le_total_of_le_of_le {x y : part α} (z : part α) (hx : x ≤ z) (hy : y ≤ z) :
x ≤ y ∨ y ≤ x :=
begin
rcases part.eq_none_or_eq_some x with h | ⟨b, h₀⟩,
{ rw h, left, apply order_bot.bot_le _ },
right, intros b' h₁,
rw part.eq_some_iff at h₀,
replace hx := hx _ h₀, replace hy := hy _ h₁,
replace hx := part.mem_unique hx hy, subst hx,
exact h₀
end
/-- `assert p f` is a bind-like operation which appends an additional condition
`p` to the domain and uses `f` to produce the value. -/
def assert (p : Prop) (f : p → part α) : part α :=
⟨∃h : p, (f h).dom, λha, (f ha.fst).get ha.snd⟩
/-- The bind operation has value `g (f.get)`, and is defined when all the
parts are defined. -/
protected def bind (f : part α) (g : α → part β) : part β :=
assert (dom f) (λb, g (f.get b))
/-- The map operation for `part` just maps the value and maintains the same domain. -/
def map (f : α → β) (o : part α) : part β :=
⟨o.dom, f ∘ o.get⟩
theorem mem_map (f : α → β) {o : part α} :
∀ {a}, a ∈ o → f a ∈ map f o
| _ ⟨h, rfl⟩ := ⟨_, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_map_iff (f : α → β) {o : part α} {b} :
b ∈ map f o ↔ ∃ a ∈ o, f a = b :=
⟨match b with _, ⟨h, rfl⟩ := ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩, rfl⟩ end,
λ ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩, h₂ ▸ mem_map f h₁⟩
@[simp] theorem map_none (f : α → β) :
map f none = none := eq_none_iff.2 $ λ a, by simp
@[simp] theorem map_some (f : α → β) (a : α) : map f (some a) = some (f a) :=
eq_some_iff.2 $ mem_map f $ mem_some _
theorem mem_assert {p : Prop} {f : p → part α}
: ∀ {a} (h : p), a ∈ f h → a ∈ assert p f
| _ x ⟨h, rfl⟩ := ⟨⟨x, h⟩, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_assert_iff {p : Prop} {f : p → part α} {a} :
a ∈ assert p f ↔ ∃ h : p, a ∈ f h :=
⟨match a with _, ⟨h, rfl⟩ := ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩ end,
λ ⟨a, h⟩, mem_assert _ h⟩
lemma assert_pos {p : Prop} {f : p → part α} (h : p) :
assert p f = f h :=
begin
dsimp [assert],
cases h' : f h,
simp only [h', h, true_and, iff_self, exists_prop_of_true, eq_iff_iff],
apply function.hfunext,
{ simp only [h,h',exists_prop_of_true] },
{ cc }
end
lemma assert_neg {p : Prop} {f : p → part α} (h : ¬ p) :
assert p f = none :=
begin
dsimp [assert,none], congr,
{ simp only [h, not_false_iff, exists_prop_of_false] },
{ apply function.hfunext,
{ simp only [h, not_false_iff, exists_prop_of_false] },
cc },
end
theorem mem_bind {f : part α} {g : α → part β} :
∀ {a b}, a ∈ f → b ∈ g a → b ∈ f.bind g
| _ _ ⟨h, rfl⟩ ⟨h₂, rfl⟩ := ⟨⟨h, h₂⟩, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_bind_iff {f : part α} {g : α → part β} {b} :
b ∈ f.bind g ↔ ∃ a ∈ f, b ∈ g a :=
⟨match b with _, ⟨⟨h₁, h₂⟩, rfl⟩ := ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩ end,
λ ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩, mem_bind h₁ h₂⟩
@[simp] theorem bind_none (f : α → part β) :
none.bind f = none := eq_none_iff.2 $ λ a, by simp
@[simp] theorem bind_some (a : α) (f : α → part β) :
(some a).bind f = f a := ext $ by simp
theorem bind_some_eq_map (f : α → β) (x : part α) :
x.bind (some ∘ f) = map f x :=
ext $ by simp [eq_comm]
theorem bind_assoc {γ} (f : part α) (g : α → part β) (k : β → part γ) :
(f.bind g).bind k = f.bind (λ x, (g x).bind k) :=
ext $ λ a, by simp; exact
⟨λ ⟨_, ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩, h₃⟩, ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, h₃⟩,
λ ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, h₃⟩, ⟨_, ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩, h₃⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem bind_map {γ} (f : α → β) (x) (g : β → part γ) :
(map f x).bind g = x.bind (λ y, g (f y)) :=
by rw [← bind_some_eq_map, bind_assoc]; simp
@[simp] theorem map_bind {γ} (f : α → part β) (x : part α) (g : β → γ) :
map g (x.bind f) = x.bind (λ y, map g (f y)) :=
by rw [← bind_some_eq_map, bind_assoc]; simp [bind_some_eq_map]
theorem map_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (o : part α) :
map g (map f o) = map (g ∘ f) o :=
by rw [← bind_some_eq_map, bind_map, bind_some_eq_map]
instance : monad part :=
{ pure := @some,
map := @map,
bind := @part.bind }
instance : is_lawful_monad part :=
{ bind_pure_comp_eq_map := @bind_some_eq_map,
id_map := λ β f, by cases f; refl,
pure_bind := @bind_some,
bind_assoc := @bind_assoc }
theorem map_id' {f : α → α} (H : ∀ (x : α), f x = x) (o) : map f o = o :=
by rw [show f = id, from funext H]; exact id_map o
@[simp] theorem bind_some_right (x : part α) : x.bind some = x :=
by rw [bind_some_eq_map]; simp [map_id']
@[simp] theorem pure_eq_some (a : α) : pure a = some a := rfl
@[simp] theorem ret_eq_some (a : α) : return a = some a := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (o : part α) :
f <$> o = map f o := rfl
@[simp] theorem bind_eq_bind {α β} (f : part α) (g : α → part β) :
f >>= g = f.bind g := rfl
lemma bind_le {α} (x : part α) (f : α → part β) (y : part β) :
x >>= f ≤ y ↔ (∀ a, a ∈ x → f a ≤ y) :=
begin
split; intro h,
{ intros a h' b, replace h := h b,
simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, bind_eq_bind, mem_bind_iff, exists_imp_distrib] at h,
apply h _ h' },
{ intros b h',
simp only [exists_prop, bind_eq_bind, mem_bind_iff] at h',
rcases h' with ⟨a,h₀,h₁⟩, apply h _ h₀ _ h₁ },
end
instance : monad_fail part :=
{ fail := λ_ _, none, ..part.monad }
/-- `restrict p o h` replaces the domain of `o` with `p`, and is well defined when
`p` implies `o` is defined. -/
def restrict (p : Prop) : ∀ (o : part α), (p → o.dom) → part α
| ⟨d, f⟩ H := ⟨p, λh, f (H h)⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_restrict (p : Prop) (o : part α) (h : p → o.dom) (a : α) :
a ∈ restrict p o h ↔ p ∧ a ∈ o :=
begin
cases o, dsimp [restrict, mem_eq], split,
{ rintro ⟨h₀, h₁⟩, exact ⟨h₀, ⟨_, h₁⟩⟩ },
rintro ⟨h₀, h₁, h₂⟩, exact ⟨h₀, h₂⟩
end
/-- `unwrap o` gets the value at `o`, ignoring the condition. This function is unsound. -/
meta def unwrap (o : part α) : α := o.get undefined
theorem assert_defined {p : Prop} {f : p → part α} :
∀ (h : p), (f h).dom → (assert p f).dom := exists.intro
theorem bind_defined {f : part α} {g : α → part β} :
∀ (h : f.dom), (g (f.get h)).dom → (f.bind g).dom := assert_defined
@[simp] theorem bind_dom {f : part α} {g : α → part β} :
(f.bind g).dom ↔ ∃ h : f.dom, (g (f.get h)).dom := iff.rfl
end part
|
1c68a8ee7c2abfa6d654a9d9d7c5b7230ab1912e | ebb7367fa8ab324601b5abf705720fd4cc0e8598 | /algebra/module.hlean | 7475fb7f4c8cb1f8883607a60a21a38b0d4231b8 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | radams78/Spectral | 3e34916d9bbd0939ee6a629e36744827ff27bfc2 | c8145341046cfa2b4960ef3cc5a1117d12c43f63 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,421,583,830 | 1,481,232,014,000 | 1,481,232,014,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,294 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Nathaniel Thomas. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Nathaniel Thomas, Jeremy Avigad
Modules prod vector spaces over a ring.
(We use "left_module," which is more precise, because "module" is a keyword.)
-/
import algebra.field
open algebra
structure has_scalar [class] (F V : Type) :=
(smul : F → V → V)
infixl ` • `:73 := has_scalar.smul
/- modules over a ring -/
structure left_module (R M : Type) [ringR : ring R] extends has_scalar R M, ab_group M renaming
mul→add mul_assoc→add_assoc one→zero one_mul→zero_add mul_one→add_zero inv→neg
mul_left_inv→add_left_inv mul_comm→add_comm :=
(smul_left_distrib : Π (r : R) (x y : M), smul r (add x y) = (add (smul r x) (smul r y)))
(smul_right_distrib : Π (r s : R) (x : M), smul (ring.add _ r s) x = (add (smul r x) (smul s x)))
(mul_smul : Π r s x, smul (mul r s) x = smul r (smul s x))
(one_smul : Π x, smul one x = x)
/- we make it a class now (and not as part of the structure) to avoid
left_module.to_ab_group to be an instance -/
attribute left_module [class]
definition add_ab_group_of_left_module [reducible] [trans_instance] (R M : Type) [K : ring R]
[H : left_module R M] : add_ab_group M :=
@left_module.to_ab_group R M K H
definition has_scalar_of_left_module [reducible] [trans_instance] (R M : Type) [K : ring R]
[H : left_module R M] : has_scalar R M :=
@left_module.to_has_scalar R M K H
section left_module
variables {R M : Type}
variable [ringR : ring R]
variable [moduleRM : left_module R M]
include ringR moduleRM
-- Note: the anonymous include does not work in the propositions below.
proposition smul_left_distrib (a : R) (u v : M) : a • (u + v) = a • u + a • v :=
!left_module.smul_left_distrib
proposition smul_right_distrib (a b : R) (u : M) : (a + b) • u = a • u + b • u :=
!left_module.smul_right_distrib
proposition mul_smul (a : R) (b : R) (u : M) : (a * b) • u = a • (b • u) :=
!left_module.mul_smul
proposition one_smul (u : M) : (1 : R) • u = u := !left_module.one_smul
proposition zero_smul (u : M) : (0 : R) • u = 0 :=
have (0 : R) • u + 0 • u = 0 • u + 0, by rewrite [-smul_right_distrib, *add_zero],
!add.left_cancel this
proposition smul_zero (a : R) : a • (0 : M) = 0 :=
have a • (0:M) + a • 0 = a • 0 + 0, by rewrite [-smul_left_distrib, *add_zero],
!add.left_cancel this
proposition neg_smul (a : R) (u : M) : (-a) • u = - (a • u) :=
eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero (by rewrite [-smul_right_distrib, add.left_inv, zero_smul])
proposition neg_one_smul (u : M) : -(1 : R) • u = -u :=
by rewrite [neg_smul, one_smul]
proposition smul_neg (a : R) (u : M) : a • (-u) = -(a • u) :=
by rewrite [-neg_one_smul, -mul_smul, mul_neg_one_eq_neg, neg_smul]
proposition smul_sub_left_distrib (a : R) (u v : M) : a • (u - v) = a • u - a • v :=
by rewrite [sub_eq_add_neg, smul_left_distrib, smul_neg]
proposition sub_smul_right_distrib (a b : R) (v : M) : (a - b) • v = a • v - b • v :=
by rewrite [sub_eq_add_neg, smul_right_distrib, neg_smul]
end left_module
/- vector spaces -/
structure vector_space [class] (F V : Type) [fieldF : field F]
extends left_module F V
|
8aa86f9db28380b5c200a7b9884d1d5056d9a5ed | dd0f5513e11c52db157d2fcc8456d9401a6cd9da | /09_Type_Classes.org.24.lean | 5d0fe45ab3226f4612b47d137ceec8fb12cd9141 | [] | no_license | cjmazey/lean-tutorial | ba559a49f82aa6c5848b9bf17b7389bf7f4ba645 | 381f61c9fcac56d01d959ae0fa6e376f2c4e3b34 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,286,098,832 | 1,447,124,923,000 | 1,447,124,923,000 | 43,082,433 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 536 | lean | import standard
open nat
inductive foo [class] :=
mk : nat → nat → foo
definition foo.a [p : foo] : nat := foo.rec_on p (λ a b, a)
definition i1 [instance] [priority std.priority.default+10] : foo :=
foo.mk 1 1
definition i2 [instance] : foo :=
foo.mk 2 2
example : foo.a = 1 := rfl
definition i3 [instance] [priority std.priority.default+20] : foo :=
foo.mk 3 3
example : foo.a = 3 := rfl
attribute i3 [priority 500]
example : foo.a = 1 := rfl
attribute i1 [priority std.priority.default-10]
example : foo.a = 2 := rfl
|
07bbac581c450137e92dfb1f20382e118dfa3fae | c777c32c8e484e195053731103c5e52af26a25d1 | /src/linear_algebra/determinant.lean | c7a57875c72afe6b988469968b3fce935a6af1c8 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kbuzzard/mathlib | 2ff9e85dfe2a46f4b291927f983afec17e946eb8 | 58537299e922f9c77df76cb613910914a479c1f7 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,313,702,744 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 128,185,277 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,522,920,600,000 | 1,522,920,600,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 26,059 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Casper Putz, Anne Baanen
-/
import linear_algebra.finite_dimensional
import linear_algebra.general_linear_group
import linear_algebra.matrix.reindex
import tactic.field_simp
import linear_algebra.matrix.nonsingular_inverse
import linear_algebra.matrix.basis
/-!
# Determinant of families of vectors
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
This file defines the determinant of an endomorphism, and of a family of vectors
with respect to some basis. For the determinant of a matrix, see the file
`linear_algebra.matrix.determinant`.
## Main definitions
In the list below, and in all this file, `R` is a commutative ring (semiring
is sometimes enough), `M` and its variations are `R`-modules, `ι`, `κ`, `n` and `m` are finite
types used for indexing.
* `basis.det`: the determinant of a family of vectors with respect to a basis,
as a multilinear map
* `linear_map.det`: the determinant of an endomorphism `f : End R M` as a
multiplicative homomorphism (if `M` does not have a finite `R`-basis, the
result is `1` instead)
* `linear_equiv.det`: the determinant of an isomorphism `f : M ≃ₗ[R] M` as a
multiplicative homomorphism (if `M` does not have a finite `R`-basis, the
result is `1` instead)
## Tags
basis, det, determinant
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale big_operators
open_locale matrix
open linear_map
open submodule
universes u v w
open linear_map matrix set function
variables {R : Type*} [comm_ring R]
variables {M : Type*} [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
variables {M' : Type*} [add_comm_group M'] [module R M']
variables {ι : Type*} [decidable_eq ι] [fintype ι]
variables (e : basis ι R M)
section conjugate
variables {A : Type*} [comm_ring A]
variables {m n : Type*} [fintype m] [fintype n]
/-- If `R^m` and `R^n` are linearly equivalent, then `m` and `n` are also equivalent. -/
def equiv_of_pi_lequiv_pi {R : Type*} [comm_ring R] [nontrivial R]
(e : (m → R) ≃ₗ[R] (n → R)) : m ≃ n :=
basis.index_equiv (basis.of_equiv_fun e.symm) (pi.basis_fun _ _)
namespace matrix
/-- If `M` and `M'` are each other's inverse matrices, they are square matrices up to
equivalence of types. -/
def index_equiv_of_inv [nontrivial A] [decidable_eq m] [decidable_eq n]
{M : matrix m n A} {M' : matrix n m A}
(hMM' : M ⬝ M' = 1) (hM'M : M' ⬝ M = 1) :
m ≃ n :=
equiv_of_pi_lequiv_pi (to_lin'_of_inv hMM' hM'M)
lemma det_comm [decidable_eq n] (M N : matrix n n A) : det (M ⬝ N) = det (N ⬝ M) :=
by rw [det_mul, det_mul, mul_comm]
/-- If there exists a two-sided inverse `M'` for `M` (indexed differently),
then `det (N ⬝ M) = det (M ⬝ N)`. -/
lemma det_comm' [decidable_eq m] [decidable_eq n]
{M : matrix n m A} {N : matrix m n A} {M' : matrix m n A}
(hMM' : M ⬝ M' = 1) (hM'M : M' ⬝ M = 1) :
det (M ⬝ N) = det (N ⬝ M) :=
begin
nontriviality A,
-- Although `m` and `n` are different a priori, we will show they have the same cardinality.
-- This turns the problem into one for square matrices, which is easy.
let e := index_equiv_of_inv hMM' hM'M,
rw [← det_submatrix_equiv_self e, ← submatrix_mul_equiv _ _ _ (equiv.refl n) _, det_comm,
submatrix_mul_equiv, equiv.coe_refl, submatrix_id_id]
end
/-- If `M'` is a two-sided inverse for `M` (indexed differently), `det (M ⬝ N ⬝ M') = det N`.
See `matrix.det_conj` and `matrix.det_conj'` for the case when `M' = M⁻¹` or vice versa. -/
lemma det_conj_of_mul_eq_one [decidable_eq m] [decidable_eq n]
{M : matrix m n A} {M' : matrix n m A} {N : matrix n n A}
(hMM' : M ⬝ M' = 1) (hM'M : M' ⬝ M = 1) :
det (M ⬝ N ⬝ M') = det N :=
by rw [← det_comm' hM'M hMM', ← matrix.mul_assoc, hM'M, matrix.one_mul]
end matrix
end conjugate
namespace linear_map
/-! ### Determinant of a linear map -/
variables {A : Type*} [comm_ring A] [module A M]
variables {κ : Type*} [fintype κ]
/-- The determinant of `linear_map.to_matrix` does not depend on the choice of basis. -/
lemma det_to_matrix_eq_det_to_matrix [decidable_eq κ]
(b : basis ι A M) (c : basis κ A M) (f : M →ₗ[A] M) :
det (linear_map.to_matrix b b f) = det (linear_map.to_matrix c c f) :=
by rw [← linear_map_to_matrix_mul_basis_to_matrix c b c,
← basis_to_matrix_mul_linear_map_to_matrix b c b,
matrix.det_conj_of_mul_eq_one]; rw [basis.to_matrix_mul_to_matrix, basis.to_matrix_self]
/-- The determinant of an endomorphism given a basis.
See `linear_map.det` for a version that populates the basis non-computably.
Although the `trunc (basis ι A M)` parameter makes it slightly more convenient to switch bases,
there is no good way to generalize over universe parameters, so we can't fully state in `det_aux`'s
type that it does not depend on the choice of basis. Instead you can use the `det_aux_def'` lemma,
or avoid mentioning a basis at all using `linear_map.det`.
-/
@[irreducible] def det_aux : trunc (basis ι A M) → (M →ₗ[A] M) →* A :=
trunc.lift
(λ b : basis ι A M,
(det_monoid_hom).comp (to_matrix_alg_equiv b : (M →ₗ[A] M) →* matrix ι ι A))
(λ b c, monoid_hom.ext $ det_to_matrix_eq_det_to_matrix b c)
/-- Unfold lemma for `det_aux`.
See also `det_aux_def'` which allows you to vary the basis.
-/
lemma det_aux_def (b : basis ι A M) (f : M →ₗ[A] M) :
linear_map.det_aux (trunc.mk b) f = matrix.det (linear_map.to_matrix b b f) :=
by { rw [det_aux], refl }
lemma det_aux_def' {ι' : Type*} [fintype ι'] [decidable_eq ι']
(tb : trunc $ basis ι A M) (b' : basis ι' A M) (f : M →ₗ[A] M) :
linear_map.det_aux tb f = matrix.det (linear_map.to_matrix b' b' f) :=
by { apply trunc.induction_on tb, intro b, rw [det_aux_def, det_to_matrix_eq_det_to_matrix b b'] }
@[simp]
lemma det_aux_id (b : trunc $ basis ι A M) : linear_map.det_aux b (linear_map.id) = 1 :=
(linear_map.det_aux b).map_one
@[simp]
lemma det_aux_comp (b : trunc $ basis ι A M) (f g : M →ₗ[A] M) :
linear_map.det_aux b (f.comp g) = linear_map.det_aux b f * linear_map.det_aux b g :=
(linear_map.det_aux b).map_mul f g
section
open_locale classical
-- Discourage the elaborator from unfolding `det` and producing a huge term by marking it
-- as irreducible.
/-- The determinant of an endomorphism independent of basis.
If there is no finite basis on `M`, the result is `1` instead.
-/
@[irreducible] protected def det : (M →ₗ[A] M) →* A :=
if H : ∃ (s : finset M), nonempty (basis s A M)
then linear_map.det_aux (trunc.mk H.some_spec.some)
else 1
lemma coe_det [decidable_eq M] : ⇑(linear_map.det : (M →ₗ[A] M) →* A) =
if H : ∃ (s : finset M), nonempty (basis s A M)
then linear_map.det_aux (trunc.mk H.some_spec.some)
else 1 :=
by { ext, unfold linear_map.det,
split_ifs,
{ congr }, -- use the correct `decidable_eq` instance
refl }
end
-- Auxiliary lemma, the `simp` normal form goes in the other direction
-- (using `linear_map.det_to_matrix`)
lemma det_eq_det_to_matrix_of_finset [decidable_eq M]
{s : finset M} (b : basis s A M) (f : M →ₗ[A] M) :
f.det = matrix.det (linear_map.to_matrix b b f) :=
have ∃ (s : finset M), nonempty (basis s A M),
from ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩,
by rw [linear_map.coe_det, dif_pos, det_aux_def' _ b]; assumption
@[simp] lemma det_to_matrix
(b : basis ι A M) (f : M →ₗ[A] M) :
matrix.det (to_matrix b b f) = f.det :=
by { haveI := classical.dec_eq M,
rw [det_eq_det_to_matrix_of_finset b.reindex_finset_range, det_to_matrix_eq_det_to_matrix b] }
@[simp] lemma det_to_matrix' {ι : Type*} [fintype ι] [decidable_eq ι]
(f : (ι → A) →ₗ[A] (ι → A)) :
det f.to_matrix' = f.det :=
by simp [← to_matrix_eq_to_matrix']
@[simp] lemma det_to_lin (b : basis ι R M) (f : matrix ι ι R) :
linear_map.det (matrix.to_lin b b f) = f.det :=
by rw [← linear_map.det_to_matrix b, linear_map.to_matrix_to_lin]
@[simp] lemma det_to_lin' (f : matrix ι ι R) :
linear_map.det (f.to_lin') = f.det :=
by simp only [← to_lin_eq_to_lin', det_to_lin]
/-- To show `P f.det` it suffices to consider `P (to_matrix _ _ f).det` and `P 1`. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator]
lemma det_cases [decidable_eq M] {P : A → Prop} (f : M →ₗ[A] M)
(hb : ∀ (s : finset M) (b : basis s A M), P (to_matrix b b f).det) (h1 : P 1) :
P f.det :=
begin
unfold linear_map.det,
split_ifs with h,
{ convert hb _ h.some_spec.some,
apply det_aux_def' },
{ exact h1 }
end
@[simp]
lemma det_comp (f g : M →ₗ[A] M) : (f.comp g).det = f.det * g.det :=
linear_map.det.map_mul f g
@[simp]
lemma det_id : (linear_map.id : M →ₗ[A] M).det = 1 :=
linear_map.det.map_one
/-- Multiplying a map by a scalar `c` multiplies its determinant by `c ^ dim M`. -/
@[simp] lemma det_smul {𝕜 : Type*} [field 𝕜] {M : Type*} [add_comm_group M] [module 𝕜 M]
(c : 𝕜) (f : M →ₗ[𝕜] M) :
linear_map.det (c • f) = c ^ (finite_dimensional.finrank 𝕜 M) * linear_map.det f :=
begin
by_cases H : ∃ (s : finset M), nonempty (basis s 𝕜 M),
{ haveI : finite_dimensional 𝕜 M,
{ rcases H with ⟨s, ⟨hs⟩⟩, exact finite_dimensional.of_fintype_basis hs },
simp only [← det_to_matrix (finite_dimensional.fin_basis 𝕜 M), linear_equiv.map_smul,
fintype.card_fin, det_smul] },
{ classical,
have : finite_dimensional.finrank 𝕜 M = 0 := finrank_eq_zero_of_not_exists_basis H,
simp [coe_det, H, this] }
end
lemma det_zero' {ι : Type*} [finite ι] [nonempty ι] (b : basis ι A M) :
linear_map.det (0 : M →ₗ[A] M) = 0 :=
by { haveI := classical.dec_eq ι, casesI nonempty_fintype ι,
rwa [← det_to_matrix b, linear_equiv.map_zero, det_zero] }
/-- In a finite-dimensional vector space, the zero map has determinant `1` in dimension `0`,
and `0` otherwise. We give a formula that also works in infinite dimension, where we define
the determinant to be `1`. -/
@[simp] lemma det_zero {𝕜 : Type*} [field 𝕜] {M : Type*} [add_comm_group M] [module 𝕜 M] :
linear_map.det (0 : M →ₗ[𝕜] M) = (0 : 𝕜) ^ (finite_dimensional.finrank 𝕜 M) :=
by simp only [← zero_smul 𝕜 (1 : M →ₗ[𝕜] M), det_smul, mul_one, monoid_hom.map_one]
lemma det_eq_one_of_subsingleton [subsingleton M] (f : M →ₗ[R] M) : (f : M →ₗ[R] M).det = 1 :=
begin
have b : basis (fin 0) R M := basis.empty M,
rw ← f.det_to_matrix b,
exact matrix.det_is_empty,
end
lemma det_eq_one_of_finrank_eq_zero {𝕜 : Type*} [field 𝕜] {M : Type*} [add_comm_group M]
[module 𝕜 M] (h : finite_dimensional.finrank 𝕜 M = 0) (f : M →ₗ[𝕜] M) :
(f : M →ₗ[𝕜] M).det = 1 :=
begin
classical,
refine @linear_map.det_cases M _ 𝕜 _ _ _ (λ t, t = 1) f _ rfl,
intros s b,
haveI : is_empty s,
{ rw ← fintype.card_eq_zero_iff,
exact (finite_dimensional.finrank_eq_card_basis b).symm.trans h },
exact matrix.det_is_empty
end
/-- Conjugating a linear map by a linear equiv does not change its determinant. -/
@[simp] lemma det_conj {N : Type*} [add_comm_group N] [module A N]
(f : M →ₗ[A] M) (e : M ≃ₗ[A] N) :
linear_map.det ((e : M →ₗ[A] N) ∘ₗ (f ∘ₗ (e.symm : N →ₗ[A] M))) = linear_map.det f :=
begin
classical,
by_cases H : ∃ (s : finset M), nonempty (basis s A M),
{ rcases H with ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩,
rw [← det_to_matrix b f, ← det_to_matrix (b.map e), to_matrix_comp (b.map e) b (b.map e),
to_matrix_comp (b.map e) b b, ← matrix.mul_assoc, matrix.det_conj_of_mul_eq_one],
{ rw [← to_matrix_comp, linear_equiv.comp_coe, e.symm_trans_self,
linear_equiv.refl_to_linear_map, to_matrix_id] },
{ rw [← to_matrix_comp, linear_equiv.comp_coe, e.self_trans_symm,
linear_equiv.refl_to_linear_map, to_matrix_id] } },
{ have H' : ¬ (∃ (t : finset N), nonempty (basis t A N)),
{ contrapose! H,
rcases H with ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩,
exact ⟨_, ⟨(b.map e.symm).reindex_finset_range⟩⟩ },
simp only [coe_det, H, H', pi.one_apply, dif_neg, not_false_iff] }
end
/-- If a linear map is invertible, so is its determinant. -/
lemma is_unit_det {A : Type*} [comm_ring A] [module A M]
(f : M →ₗ[A] M) (hf : is_unit f) : is_unit f.det :=
begin
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ : ∃ g, f.comp g = 1 := hf.exists_right_inv,
have : linear_map.det f * linear_map.det g = 1,
by simp only [← linear_map.det_comp, hg, monoid_hom.map_one],
exact is_unit_of_mul_eq_one _ _ this,
end
/-- If a linear map has determinant different from `1`, then the space is finite-dimensional. -/
lemma finite_dimensional_of_det_ne_one {𝕜 : Type*} [field 𝕜] [module 𝕜 M]
(f : M →ₗ[𝕜] M) (hf : f.det ≠ 1) : finite_dimensional 𝕜 M :=
begin
by_cases H : ∃ (s : finset M), nonempty (basis s 𝕜 M),
{ rcases H with ⟨s, ⟨hs⟩⟩, exact finite_dimensional.of_fintype_basis hs },
{ classical,
simp [linear_map.coe_det, H] at hf,
exact hf.elim }
end
/-- If the determinant of a map vanishes, then the map is not onto. -/
lemma range_lt_top_of_det_eq_zero {𝕜 : Type*} [field 𝕜] [module 𝕜 M]
{f : M →ₗ[𝕜] M} (hf : f.det = 0) : f.range < ⊤ :=
begin
haveI : finite_dimensional 𝕜 M, by simp [f.finite_dimensional_of_det_ne_one, hf],
contrapose hf,
simp only [lt_top_iff_ne_top, not_not, ← is_unit_iff_range_eq_top] at hf,
exact is_unit_iff_ne_zero.1 (f.is_unit_det hf)
end
/-- If the determinant of a map vanishes, then the map is not injective. -/
lemma bot_lt_ker_of_det_eq_zero {𝕜 : Type*} [field 𝕜] [module 𝕜 M]
{f : M →ₗ[𝕜] M} (hf : f.det = 0) : ⊥ < f.ker :=
begin
haveI : finite_dimensional 𝕜 M, by simp [f.finite_dimensional_of_det_ne_one, hf],
contrapose hf,
simp only [bot_lt_iff_ne_bot, not_not, ← is_unit_iff_ker_eq_bot] at hf,
exact is_unit_iff_ne_zero.1 (f.is_unit_det hf)
end
end linear_map
namespace linear_equiv
/-- On a `linear_equiv`, the domain of `linear_map.det` can be promoted to `Rˣ`. -/
protected def det : (M ≃ₗ[R] M) →* Rˣ :=
(units.map (linear_map.det : (M →ₗ[R] M) →* R)).comp
(linear_map.general_linear_group.general_linear_equiv R M).symm.to_monoid_hom
@[simp] lemma coe_det (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M) : ↑f.det = linear_map.det (f : M →ₗ[R] M) := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_inv_det (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M) : ↑(f.det⁻¹) = linear_map.det (f.symm : M →ₗ[R] M) := rfl
@[simp] lemma det_refl : (linear_equiv.refl R M).det = 1 := units.ext $ linear_map.det_id
@[simp] lemma det_trans (f g : M ≃ₗ[R] M) : (f.trans g).det = g.det * f.det := map_mul _ g f
@[simp] lemma det_symm (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M) : f.symm.det = f.det⁻¹ := map_inv _ f
/-- Conjugating a linear equiv by a linear equiv does not change its determinant. -/
@[simp] lemma det_conj (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M) (e : M ≃ₗ[R] M') :
((e.symm.trans f).trans e).det = f.det :=
by rw [←units.eq_iff, coe_det, coe_det, ←comp_coe, ←comp_coe, linear_map.det_conj]
end linear_equiv
/-- The determinants of a `linear_equiv` and its inverse multiply to 1. -/
@[simp] lemma linear_equiv.det_mul_det_symm {A : Type*} [comm_ring A] [module A M]
(f : M ≃ₗ[A] M) : (f : M →ₗ[A] M).det * (f.symm : M →ₗ[A] M).det = 1 :=
by simp [←linear_map.det_comp]
/-- The determinants of a `linear_equiv` and its inverse multiply to 1. -/
@[simp] lemma linear_equiv.det_symm_mul_det {A : Type*} [comm_ring A] [module A M]
(f : M ≃ₗ[A] M) : (f.symm : M →ₗ[A] M).det * (f : M →ₗ[A] M).det = 1 :=
by simp [←linear_map.det_comp]
-- Cannot be stated using `linear_map.det` because `f` is not an endomorphism.
lemma linear_equiv.is_unit_det (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M') (v : basis ι R M) (v' : basis ι R M') :
is_unit (linear_map.to_matrix v v' f).det :=
begin
apply is_unit_det_of_left_inverse,
simpa using (linear_map.to_matrix_comp v v' v f.symm f).symm
end
/-- Specialization of `linear_equiv.is_unit_det` -/
lemma linear_equiv.is_unit_det' {A : Type*} [comm_ring A] [module A M]
(f : M ≃ₗ[A] M) : is_unit (linear_map.det (f : M →ₗ[A] M)) :=
is_unit_of_mul_eq_one _ _ f.det_mul_det_symm
/-- The determinant of `f.symm` is the inverse of that of `f` when `f` is a linear equiv. -/
lemma linear_equiv.det_coe_symm {𝕜 : Type*} [field 𝕜] [module 𝕜 M]
(f : M ≃ₗ[𝕜] M) : (f.symm : M →ₗ[𝕜] M).det = (f : M →ₗ[𝕜] M).det ⁻¹ :=
by field_simp [is_unit.ne_zero f.is_unit_det']
/-- Builds a linear equivalence from a linear map whose determinant in some bases is a unit. -/
@[simps]
def linear_equiv.of_is_unit_det {f : M →ₗ[R] M'} {v : basis ι R M} {v' : basis ι R M'}
(h : is_unit (linear_map.to_matrix v v' f).det) : M ≃ₗ[R] M' :=
{ to_fun := f,
map_add' := f.map_add,
map_smul' := f.map_smul,
inv_fun := to_lin v' v (to_matrix v v' f)⁻¹,
left_inv := λ x,
calc to_lin v' v (to_matrix v v' f)⁻¹ (f x)
= to_lin v v ((to_matrix v v' f)⁻¹ ⬝ to_matrix v v' f) x :
by { rw [to_lin_mul v v' v, to_lin_to_matrix, linear_map.comp_apply] }
... = x : by simp [h],
right_inv := λ x,
calc f (to_lin v' v (to_matrix v v' f)⁻¹ x)
= to_lin v' v' (to_matrix v v' f ⬝ (to_matrix v v' f)⁻¹) x :
by { rw [to_lin_mul v' v v', linear_map.comp_apply, to_lin_to_matrix v v'] }
... = x : by simp [h] }
@[simp] lemma linear_equiv.coe_of_is_unit_det {f : M →ₗ[R] M'} {v : basis ι R M} {v' : basis ι R M'}
(h : is_unit (linear_map.to_matrix v v' f).det) :
(linear_equiv.of_is_unit_det h : M →ₗ[R] M') = f :=
by { ext x, refl }
/-- Builds a linear equivalence from a linear map on a finite-dimensional vector space whose
determinant is nonzero. -/
@[reducible] def linear_map.equiv_of_det_ne_zero
{𝕜 : Type*} [field 𝕜] {M : Type*} [add_comm_group M] [module 𝕜 M]
[finite_dimensional 𝕜 M] (f : M →ₗ[𝕜] M) (hf : linear_map.det f ≠ 0) :
M ≃ₗ[𝕜] M :=
have is_unit (linear_map.to_matrix (finite_dimensional.fin_basis 𝕜 M)
(finite_dimensional.fin_basis 𝕜 M) f).det :=
by simp only [linear_map.det_to_matrix, is_unit_iff_ne_zero.2 hf],
linear_equiv.of_is_unit_det this
lemma linear_map.associated_det_of_eq_comp (e : M ≃ₗ[R] M) (f f' : M →ₗ[R] M)
(h : ∀ x, f x = f' (e x)) : associated f.det f'.det :=
begin
suffices : associated (f' ∘ₗ ↑e).det f'.det,
{ convert this using 2, ext x, exact h x },
rw [← mul_one f'.det, linear_map.det_comp],
exact associated.mul_left _ (associated_one_iff_is_unit.mpr e.is_unit_det')
end
lemma linear_map.associated_det_comp_equiv {N : Type*} [add_comm_group N] [module R N]
(f : N →ₗ[R] M) (e e' : M ≃ₗ[R] N) :
associated (f ∘ₗ ↑e).det (f ∘ₗ ↑e').det :=
begin
refine linear_map.associated_det_of_eq_comp (e.trans e'.symm) _ _ _,
intro x,
simp only [linear_map.comp_apply, linear_equiv.coe_coe, linear_equiv.trans_apply,
linear_equiv.apply_symm_apply],
end
/-- The determinant of a family of vectors with respect to some basis, as an alternating
multilinear map. -/
def basis.det : alternating_map R M R ι :=
{ to_fun := λ v, det (e.to_matrix v),
map_add' := begin
intros inst v i x y,
cases subsingleton.elim inst ‹_›,
simp only [e.to_matrix_update, linear_equiv.map_add, finsupp.coe_add],
exact det_update_column_add _ _ _ _,
end,
map_smul' := begin
intros inst u i c x,
cases subsingleton.elim inst ‹_›,
simp only [e.to_matrix_update, algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, linear_equiv.map_smul],
apply det_update_column_smul
end,
map_eq_zero_of_eq' := begin
intros v i j h hij,
rw [←function.update_eq_self i v, h, ←det_transpose, e.to_matrix_update,
←update_row_transpose, ←e.to_matrix_transpose_apply],
apply det_zero_of_row_eq hij,
rw [update_row_ne hij.symm, update_row_self],
end }
lemma basis.det_apply (v : ι → M) : e.det v = det (e.to_matrix v) := rfl
lemma basis.det_self : e.det e = 1 :=
by simp [e.det_apply]
@[simp] lemma basis.det_is_empty [is_empty ι] : e.det = alternating_map.const_of_is_empty R M 1 :=
begin
ext v,
exact matrix.det_is_empty,
end
/-- `basis.det` is not the zero map. -/
lemma basis.det_ne_zero [nontrivial R] : e.det ≠ 0 :=
λ h, by simpa [h] using e.det_self
lemma is_basis_iff_det {v : ι → M} :
linear_independent R v ∧ span R (set.range v) = ⊤ ↔ is_unit (e.det v) :=
begin
split,
{ rintro ⟨hli, hspan⟩,
set v' := basis.mk hli hspan.ge with v'_eq,
rw e.det_apply,
convert linear_equiv.is_unit_det (linear_equiv.refl _ _) v' e using 2,
ext i j,
simp },
{ intro h,
rw [basis.det_apply, basis.to_matrix_eq_to_matrix_constr] at h,
set v' := basis.map e (linear_equiv.of_is_unit_det h) with v'_def,
have : ⇑ v' = v,
{ ext i, rw [v'_def, basis.map_apply, linear_equiv.of_is_unit_det_apply, e.constr_basis] },
rw ← this,
exact ⟨v'.linear_independent, v'.span_eq⟩ },
end
lemma basis.is_unit_det (e' : basis ι R M) : is_unit (e.det e') :=
(is_basis_iff_det e).mp ⟨e'.linear_independent, e'.span_eq⟩
/-- Any alternating map to `R` where `ι` has the cardinality of a basis equals the determinant
map with respect to that basis, multiplied by the value of that alternating map on that basis. -/
lemma alternating_map.eq_smul_basis_det (f : alternating_map R M R ι) : f = f e • e.det :=
begin
refine basis.ext_alternating e (λ i h, _),
let σ : equiv.perm ι := equiv.of_bijective i (finite.injective_iff_bijective.1 h),
change f (e ∘ σ) = (f e • e.det) (e ∘ σ),
simp [alternating_map.map_perm, basis.det_self]
end
@[simp] lemma alternating_map.map_basis_eq_zero_iff {ι : Type*} [finite ι]
(e : basis ι R M) (f : alternating_map R M R ι) :
f e = 0 ↔ f = 0 :=
⟨λ h, begin
casesI nonempty_fintype ι,
letI := classical.dec_eq ι,
simpa [h] using f.eq_smul_basis_det e
end, λ h, h.symm ▸ alternating_map.zero_apply _⟩
lemma alternating_map.map_basis_ne_zero_iff {ι : Type*} [finite ι]
(e : basis ι R M) (f : alternating_map R M R ι) :
f e ≠ 0 ↔ f ≠ 0 :=
not_congr $ f.map_basis_eq_zero_iff e
variables {A : Type*} [comm_ring A] [module A M]
@[simp] lemma basis.det_comp (e : basis ι A M) (f : M →ₗ[A] M) (v : ι → M) :
e.det (f ∘ v) = f.det * e.det v :=
by { rw [basis.det_apply, basis.det_apply, ← f.det_to_matrix e, ← matrix.det_mul,
e.to_matrix_eq_to_matrix_constr (f ∘ v), e.to_matrix_eq_to_matrix_constr v,
← to_matrix_comp, e.constr_comp] }
@[simp] lemma basis.det_comp_basis [module A M']
(b : basis ι A M) (b' : basis ι A M') (f : M →ₗ[A] M') :
b'.det (f ∘ b) = linear_map.det (f ∘ₗ (b'.equiv b (equiv.refl ι) : M' →ₗ[A] M)) :=
begin
rw [basis.det_apply, ← linear_map.det_to_matrix b', linear_map.to_matrix_comp _ b,
matrix.det_mul, linear_map.to_matrix_basis_equiv, matrix.det_one, mul_one],
congr' 1, ext i j,
rw [basis.to_matrix_apply, linear_map.to_matrix_apply]
end
lemma basis.det_reindex {ι' : Type*} [fintype ι'] [decidable_eq ι']
(b : basis ι R M) (v : ι' → M) (e : ι ≃ ι') :
(b.reindex e).det v = b.det (v ∘ e) :=
by rw [basis.det_apply, basis.to_matrix_reindex', det_reindex_alg_equiv, basis.det_apply]
lemma basis.det_reindex_symm {ι' : Type*} [fintype ι'] [decidable_eq ι']
(b : basis ι R M) (v : ι → M) (e : ι' ≃ ι) :
(b.reindex e.symm).det (v ∘ e) = b.det v :=
by rw [basis.det_reindex, function.comp.assoc, e.self_comp_symm, function.comp.right_id]
@[simp]
lemma basis.det_map (b : basis ι R M) (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M') (v : ι → M') :
(b.map f).det v = b.det (f.symm ∘ v) :=
by { rw [basis.det_apply, basis.to_matrix_map, basis.det_apply] }
lemma basis.det_map' (b : basis ι R M) (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M') :
(b.map f).det = b.det.comp_linear_map f.symm :=
alternating_map.ext $ b.det_map f
@[simp] lemma pi.basis_fun_det : (pi.basis_fun R ι).det = matrix.det_row_alternating :=
begin
ext M,
rw [basis.det_apply, basis.coe_pi_basis_fun.to_matrix_eq_transpose, det_transpose],
end
/-- If we fix a background basis `e`, then for any other basis `v`, we can characterise the
coordinates provided by `v` in terms of determinants relative to `e`. -/
lemma basis.det_smul_mk_coord_eq_det_update {v : ι → M}
(hli : linear_independent R v) (hsp : ⊤ ≤ span R (range v)) (i : ι) :
(e.det v) • (basis.mk hli hsp).coord i = e.det.to_multilinear_map.to_linear_map v i :=
begin
apply (basis.mk hli hsp).ext,
intros k,
rcases eq_or_ne k i with rfl | hik;
simp only [algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, basis.coe_mk, linear_map.smul_apply, linear_map.coe_mk,
multilinear_map.to_linear_map_apply],
{ rw [basis.mk_coord_apply_eq, mul_one, update_eq_self], congr, },
{ rw [basis.mk_coord_apply_ne hik, mul_zero, eq_comm],
exact e.det.map_eq_zero_of_eq _ (by simp [hik, function.update_apply]) hik, },
end
/-- If a basis is multiplied columnwise by scalars `w : ι → Rˣ`, then the determinant with respect
to this basis is multiplied by the product of the inverse of these scalars. -/
lemma basis.det_units_smul (e : basis ι R M) (w : ι → Rˣ) :
(e.units_smul w).det = (↑(∏ i, w i)⁻¹ : R) • e.det :=
begin
ext f,
change matrix.det (λ i j, (e.units_smul w).repr (f j) i)
= (↑(∏ i, w i)⁻¹ : R) • matrix.det (λ i j, e.repr (f j) i),
simp only [e.repr_units_smul],
convert matrix.det_mul_column (λ i, (↑((w i)⁻¹) : R)) (λ i j, e.repr (f j) i),
simp [← finset.prod_inv_distrib]
end
/-- The determinant of a basis constructed by `units_smul` is the product of the given units. -/
@[simp] lemma basis.det_units_smul_self (w : ι → Rˣ) : e.det (e.units_smul w) = ∏ i, w i :=
by simp [basis.det_apply]
/-- The determinant of a basis constructed by `is_unit_smul` is the product of the given units. -/
@[simp] lemma basis.det_is_unit_smul {w : ι → R} (hw : ∀ i, is_unit (w i)) :
e.det (e.is_unit_smul hw) = ∏ i, w i :=
e.det_units_smul_self _
|
b4805f33b190e1ee6202ae46aa8b8ca9656ebb5b | c777c32c8e484e195053731103c5e52af26a25d1 | /src/linear_algebra/clifford_algebra/even_equiv.lean | caf1ccefbe51964293800fe4f2c8865d7939ef97 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kbuzzard/mathlib | 2ff9e85dfe2a46f4b291927f983afec17e946eb8 | 58537299e922f9c77df76cb613910914a479c1f7 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,313,702,744 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 128,185,277 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,522,920,600,000 | 1,522,920,600,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,306 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import linear_algebra.clifford_algebra.conjugation
import linear_algebra.clifford_algebra.even
import linear_algebra.quadratic_form.prod
/-!
# Isomorphisms with the even subalgebra of a Clifford algebra
This file provides some notable isomorphisms regarding the even subalgebra, `clifford_algebra.even`.
## Main definitions
* `clifford_algebra.equiv_even`: Every Clifford algebra is isomorphic as an algebra to the even
subalgebra of a Clifford algebra with one more dimension.
* `clifford_algebra.even_equiv.Q'`: The quadratic form used by this "one-up" algebra.
* `clifford_algebra.to_even`: The simp-normal form of the forward direction of this isomorphism.
* `clifford_algebra.of_even`: The simp-normal form of the reverse direction of this isomorphism.
* `clifford_algebra.even_equiv_even_neg`: Every even subalgebra is isomorphic to the even subalgebra
of the Clifford algebra with negated quadratic form.
* `clifford_algebra.even_to_neg`: The simp-normal form of each direction of this isomorphism.
## Main results
* `clifford_algebra.coe_to_even_reverse_involute`: the behavior of `clifford_algebra.to_even` on the
"Clifford conjugate", that is `clifford_algebra.reverse` composed with
`clifford_algebra.involute`.
-/
namespace clifford_algebra
variables {R M : Type*} [comm_ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
variables (Q : quadratic_form R M)
/-! ### Constructions needed for `clifford_algebra.equiv_even` -/
namespace equiv_even
/-- The quadratic form on the augmented vector space `M × R` sending `v + r•e0` to `Q v - r^2`. -/
@[reducible]
def Q' : quadratic_form R (M × R) := (Q.prod $ -@quadratic_form.sq R _)
lemma Q'_apply (m : M × R) : Q' Q m = Q m.1 - m.2 * m.2 := (sub_eq_add_neg _ _).symm
/-- The unit vector in the new dimension -/
def e0 : clifford_algebra (Q' Q) := ι (Q' Q) (0, 1)
/-- The embedding from the existing vector space -/
def v : M →ₗ[R] clifford_algebra (Q' Q) := (ι (Q' Q)) ∘ₗ linear_map.inl _ _ _
lemma ι_eq_v_add_smul_e0 (m : M) (r : R) : ι (Q' Q) (m, r) = v Q m + r • e0 Q :=
by rw [e0, v, linear_map.comp_apply, linear_map.inl_apply, ←linear_map.map_smul, prod.smul_mk,
smul_zero, smul_eq_mul, mul_one, ←linear_map.map_add, prod.mk_add_mk, zero_add, add_zero]
lemma e0_mul_e0 : e0 Q * e0 Q = -1 :=
(ι_sq_scalar _ _).trans $ by simp
lemma v_sq_scalar (m : M) : v Q m * v Q m = algebra_map _ _ (Q m) :=
(ι_sq_scalar _ _).trans $ by simp
lemma neg_e0_mul_v (m : M) : -(e0 Q * v Q m) = v Q m * e0 Q :=
begin
refine neg_eq_of_add_eq_zero_right ((ι_mul_ι_add_swap _ _).trans _),
dsimp [quadratic_form.polar],
simp only [add_zero, mul_zero, mul_one, zero_add, neg_zero, quadratic_form.map_zero,
add_sub_cancel, sub_self, map_zero, zero_sub],
end
lemma neg_v_mul_e0 (m : M) : -(v Q m * e0 Q) = e0 Q * v Q m :=
begin
rw neg_eq_iff_eq_neg,
exact (neg_e0_mul_v _ m).symm
end
@[simp] lemma e0_mul_v_mul_e0 (m : M) : e0 Q * v Q m * e0 Q = v Q m :=
by rw [←neg_v_mul_e0, ←neg_mul, mul_assoc, e0_mul_e0, mul_neg_one, neg_neg]
@[simp] lemma reverse_v (m : M) : reverse (v Q m) = v Q m := reverse_ι _
@[simp] lemma involute_v (m : M) : involute (v Q m) = -v Q m := involute_ι _
@[simp] lemma reverse_e0 : reverse (e0 Q) = e0 Q := reverse_ι _
@[simp] lemma involute_e0 : involute (e0 Q) = -e0 Q := involute_ι _
end equiv_even
open equiv_even
/-- The embedding from the smaller algebra into the new larger one. -/
def to_even : clifford_algebra Q →ₐ[R] clifford_algebra.even (Q' Q) :=
begin
refine clifford_algebra.lift Q ⟨_, λ m, _⟩,
{ refine linear_map.cod_restrict _ _ (λ m, submodule.mem_supr_of_mem ⟨2, rfl⟩ _),
exact (linear_map.mul_left R $ e0 Q).comp (v Q),
rw [subtype.coe_mk, pow_two],
exact submodule.mul_mem_mul (linear_map.mem_range_self _ _) (linear_map.mem_range_self _ _), },
{ ext1,
dsimp only [subalgebra.coe_mul, linear_map.cod_restrict_apply, linear_map.comp_apply,
linear_map.mul_left_apply, linear_map.inl_apply, subalgebra.coe_algebra_map],
rw [←mul_assoc, e0_mul_v_mul_e0, v_sq_scalar] }
end
@[simp]
lemma to_even_ι (m : M) : (to_even Q (ι Q m) : clifford_algebra (Q' Q)) = e0 Q * v Q m :=
begin
rw [to_even, clifford_algebra.lift_ι_apply, linear_map.cod_restrict_apply],
refl,
end
/-- The embedding from the even subalgebra with an extra dimension into the original algebra. -/
def of_even : clifford_algebra.even (Q' Q) →ₐ[R] clifford_algebra Q :=
begin
/-
Recall that we need:
* `f ⟨0,1⟩ ⟨x,0⟩ = ι x`
* `f ⟨x,0⟩ ⟨0,1⟩ = -ι x`
* `f ⟨x,0⟩ ⟨y,0⟩ = ι x * ι y`
* `f ⟨0,1⟩ ⟨0,1⟩ = -1`
-/
let f : (M × R) →ₗ[R] (M × R) →ₗ[R] clifford_algebra Q :=
((algebra.lmul R (clifford_algebra Q)).to_linear_map.comp
$ ((ι Q).comp (linear_map.fst _ _ _)) +
(algebra.linear_map R _).comp (linear_map.snd _ _ _)).compl₂
(((ι Q).comp (linear_map.fst _ _ _)) - (algebra.linear_map R _).comp (linear_map.snd _ _ _)),
have f_apply :
∀ x y, f x y = (ι Q x.1 + algebra_map R _ x.2) * (ι Q y.1 - algebra_map R _ y.2) :=
λ x y, rfl,
have hc : ∀ (r : R) (x : clifford_algebra Q), commute (algebra_map _ _ r) x := algebra.commutes,
have hm : ∀ m : M × R,
ι Q m.1 * ι Q m.1 - algebra_map R _ m.2 * algebra_map R _ m.2 = algebra_map R _ (Q' Q m),
{ intro m,
rw [ι_sq_scalar, ←ring_hom.map_mul, ←ring_hom.map_sub,
sub_eq_add_neg, Q'_apply, sub_eq_add_neg] },
refine even.lift (Q' Q) ⟨f, _, _⟩; simp_rw [f_apply],
{ intro m,
rw [←(hc _ _).symm.mul_self_sub_mul_self_eq, hm] },
{ intros m₁ m₂ m₃,
rw [←mul_smul_comm, ←mul_assoc, mul_assoc(_ + _), ←(hc _ _).symm.mul_self_sub_mul_self_eq',
algebra.smul_def, ←mul_assoc, hm] },
end
lemma of_even_ι (x y : M × R) :
of_even Q ((even.ι _).bilin x y) =
(ι Q x.1 + algebra_map R _ x.2) * (ι Q y.1 - algebra_map R _ y.2) :=
even.lift_ι _ _ _ _
lemma to_even_comp_of_even : (to_even Q).comp (of_even Q) = alg_hom.id R _ :=
even.alg_hom_ext (Q' Q) $ even_hom.ext _ _ $ linear_map.ext $ λ m₁, linear_map.ext $ λ m₂,
subtype.ext $
let ⟨m₁, r₁⟩ := m₁, ⟨m₂, r₂⟩ := m₂ in
calc ↑(to_even Q (of_even Q ((even.ι (Q' Q)).bilin (m₁, r₁) (m₂, r₂))))
= (e0 Q * v Q m₁ + algebra_map R _ r₁) * (e0 Q * v Q m₂ - algebra_map R _ r₂) :
by rw [of_even_ι, alg_hom.map_mul, alg_hom.map_add, alg_hom.map_sub, alg_hom.commutes,
alg_hom.commutes, subalgebra.coe_mul, subalgebra.coe_add, subalgebra.coe_sub,
to_even_ι, to_even_ι, subalgebra.coe_algebra_map, subalgebra.coe_algebra_map]
... = e0 Q * v Q m₁ * (e0 Q * v Q m₂) + r₁ • e0 Q * v Q m₂ - r₂ • e0 Q * v Q m₁
- algebra_map R _ (r₁ * r₂) :
by rw [mul_sub, add_mul, add_mul, ←algebra.commutes, ←algebra.smul_def, ←map_mul,
←algebra.smul_def, sub_add_eq_sub_sub, smul_mul_assoc, smul_mul_assoc]
... = v Q m₁ * v Q m₂ + r₁ • e0 Q * v Q m₂ + v Q m₁ * r₂ • e0 Q + (r₁ • e0 Q) * r₂ • e0 Q :
have h1 : e0 Q * v Q m₁ * (e0 Q * v Q m₂) = v Q m₁ * v Q m₂,
by rw [←mul_assoc, e0_mul_v_mul_e0],
have h2 : -(r₂ • e0 Q * v Q m₁) = v Q m₁ * r₂ • e0 Q,
by rw [mul_smul_comm, smul_mul_assoc, ←smul_neg, neg_e0_mul_v],
have h3 : - algebra_map R _ (r₁ * r₂) = (r₁ • e0 Q) * r₂ • e0 Q,
by rw [algebra.algebra_map_eq_smul_one, smul_mul_smul, e0_mul_e0, smul_neg],
by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, h1, h2, h3]
... = ι _ (m₁, r₁) * ι _ (m₂, r₂) :
by rw [ι_eq_v_add_smul_e0, ι_eq_v_add_smul_e0, mul_add, add_mul, add_mul, add_assoc]
lemma of_even_comp_to_even :
(of_even Q).comp (to_even Q) = alg_hom.id R _ :=
clifford_algebra.hom_ext $ linear_map.ext $ λ m,
calc of_even Q (to_even Q (ι Q m))
= of_even Q ⟨_, (to_even Q (ι Q m)).prop⟩ : by rw subtype.coe_eta
... = (ι Q 0 + algebra_map R _ 1) * (ι Q m - algebra_map R _ 0) : begin
simp_rw to_even_ι,
exact of_even_ι Q _ _,
end
... = ι Q m : by rw [map_one, map_zero, map_zero, sub_zero, zero_add, one_mul]
/-- Any clifford algebra is isomorphic to the even subalgebra of a clifford algebra with an extra
dimension (that is, with vector space `M × R`), with a quadratic form evaluating to `-1` on that new
basis vector. -/
@[simps]
def equiv_even : clifford_algebra Q ≃ₐ[R] clifford_algebra.even (Q' Q) :=
alg_equiv.of_alg_hom
(to_even Q)
(of_even Q)
(to_even_comp_of_even Q)
(of_even_comp_to_even Q)
/-- The representation of the clifford conjugate (i.e. the reverse of the involute) in the even
subalgebra is just the reverse of the representation. -/
lemma coe_to_even_reverse_involute (x : clifford_algebra Q) :
↑(to_even Q (reverse (involute x))) = reverse (to_even Q x : clifford_algebra (Q' Q)) :=
begin
induction x using clifford_algebra.induction,
case h_grade0 : r { simp only [alg_hom.commutes, subalgebra.coe_algebra_map, reverse.commutes] },
case h_grade1 : m
{ simp only [involute_ι, subalgebra.coe_neg, to_even_ι, reverse.map_mul,
reverse_v, reverse_e0, reverse_ι, neg_e0_mul_v, map_neg] },
case h_mul : x y hx hy { simp only [map_mul, subalgebra.coe_mul, reverse.map_mul, hx, hy] },
case h_add : x y hx hy { simp only [map_add, subalgebra.coe_add, hx, hy] },
end
/-! ### Constructions needed for `clifford_algebra.even_equiv_even_neg` -/
/-- One direction of `clifford_algebra.even_equiv_even_neg` -/
def even_to_neg (Q' : quadratic_form R M) (h : Q' = -Q) :
clifford_algebra.even Q →ₐ[R] clifford_algebra.even Q' :=
even.lift Q
{ bilin := -(even.ι Q' : _).bilin,
contract := λ m, by simp_rw [linear_map.neg_apply, even_hom.contract, h,
quadratic_form.neg_apply, map_neg, neg_neg],
contract_mid := λ m₁ m₂ m₃,
by simp_rw [linear_map.neg_apply, neg_mul_neg, even_hom.contract_mid, h,
quadratic_form.neg_apply, smul_neg, neg_smul] }
@[simp] lemma even_to_neg_ι (Q' : quadratic_form R M) (h : Q' = -Q) (m₁ m₂ : M) :
even_to_neg Q Q' h ((even.ι Q).bilin m₁ m₂) = -(even.ι Q').bilin m₁ m₂ :=
even.lift_ι _ _ m₁ m₂
lemma even_to_neg_comp_even_to_neg (Q' : quadratic_form R M)
(h : Q' = -Q) (h' : Q = -Q') :
(even_to_neg Q' Q h').comp (even_to_neg Q Q' h) = alg_hom.id R _ :=
begin
ext m₁ m₂ : 4,
dsimp only [even_hom.compr₂_bilin, linear_map.compr₂_apply, alg_hom.to_linear_map_apply,
alg_hom.comp_apply, alg_hom.id_apply],
rw [even_to_neg_ι, map_neg, even_to_neg_ι, neg_neg]
end
/-- The even subalgebras of the algebras with quadratic form `Q` and `-Q` are isomorphic.
Stated another way, `𝒞ℓ⁺(p,q,r)` and `𝒞ℓ⁺(q,p,r)` are isomorphic. -/
@[simps]
def even_equiv_even_neg : clifford_algebra.even Q ≃ₐ[R] clifford_algebra.even (-Q) :=
alg_equiv.of_alg_hom
(even_to_neg Q _ rfl)
(even_to_neg (-Q) _ (neg_neg _).symm)
(even_to_neg_comp_even_to_neg _ _ _ _)
(even_to_neg_comp_even_to_neg _ _ _ _)
end clifford_algebra
|
3e42c39281f85d4eecc0dd2644c430b2a7951bc0 | ef47cc39429c8f578004338bf040c9c309b26766 | /src/solutions/friday/manifolds.lean | d1813a54a59b71ee99f1650e16dcb9f359f0a59b | [] | no_license | farmanb/lftcm2020 | 29f1c646437a8f8b00ee2e07c8b663ca04bfa16f | 1948bfaf58e3b340b39cd9b8366aa4f13e5ffa7d | refs/heads/master | 1,669,697,152,764 | 1,595,275,412,000 | 1,595,275,412,000 | 285,654,242 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,596,742,086,000 | 1,596,742,085,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 41,904 | lean | import for_mathlib.manifolds
noncomputable theory
open_locale manifold classical big_operators
open set
universe u
/-!
## Reminder on updating the exercises
These instructions are now available at:
https://leanprover-community.github.io/lftcm2020/exercises.html
To get a new copy of the exercises,
run the following commands in your terminal:
```
leanproject get lftcm2020
cp -r lftcm2020/src/exercises_sources/ lftcm2020/src/my_exercises
code lftcm2020
```
To update your exercise files, run the following commands:
```
cd /path/to/lftcm2020
git pull
leanproject get-mathlib-cache
```
Don’t forget to copy the updated files to `src/my_exercises`.
-/
/-!
## An overview of manifolds in Lean, discussing design decisions
Warning: there are sorries in this section, they are not supposed to be filled! The exercises section
start later, and there you will have plenty of sorries to fill.
What is a manifold?
1) allow field other than `ℝ` or `ℂ`?
2) allow infinite dimension?
3) allow boundary?
4) allow model space depending on the point of the manifold?
Bourbaki: 2, 4 (and just definitions and statements, no proofs!)
Lean: 1, 2, 3
Perelman geometrization theorem : any compact connected irreducible 3-manifold can
be cut along tori into finitely many pieces, each of which has a _geometric structure_ of
finite volume, i.e., it is locally like a model space, with changes of coordinates given
locally by the action of a Lie group
Typical dynamics theorem : let `M` be a compact manifold, and `f : M → M` a map with property
such and such. Then ...
Or : Consider a hyperbolic surface of genus `g`, and a random geodesic of length `T`. How many
times does it typically self-intersect?
Manifold in Lean:
* charted space structure, i.e., set of local homeos to a model space. This is data, fixed
once and for all (and a typeclass)
* compatibility condition, i.e., the change of coordinates should belong to some subgroup
of the group of local homeos of the model space. This is Prop (and a typeclass). The same
manifold can be at the same time an analytic manifold, a smooth manifold and a topological
manifold (with the same fixed atlas).
* A charted space is a smooth manifold (with corners) if it is compatible with the smooth
groupoid on the model space. To cover uniformly both situations with and without boundary,
the smooth groupoid is with respect to a map `I : H → E` (think of `H` as the half-space and
`E` the full space), which is the identity in the boundaryless situation, the inclusion in
the half-space situation. This map `I` is called a _model with corners_. The most standard ones
(identity in `ℝ^n` and inclusion of half-space in `ℝ^n`) have dedicated notations:
`𝓡 n` and `𝓡∂ n`.
-/
#check charted_space (euclidean_half_space 1) (Icc (0 : ℝ) 1)
#check has_groupoid (Icc (0 : ℝ) 1) (times_cont_diff_groupoid ∞ (𝓡∂ 1))
#check smooth_manifold_with_corners (𝓡∂ 1) (Icc (0 : ℝ) 1)
-- atlases are not maximal in general
#check (times_cont_diff_groupoid ∞ (𝓡∂ 1)).maximal_atlas (Icc (0 : ℝ) 1)
-- let's try to put a smooth manifold structure on the sphere
-- (we don't have submanifolds yet, but it's coming in the near future)
@[derive topological_space]
definition sphere (n : ℕ) : Type := metric.sphere (0 : euclidean_space (fin (n+1))) 1
instance (n : ℕ) : has_coe (sphere n) (euclidean_space (fin (n+1))) := ⟨subtype.val⟩
instance (n : ℕ) : charted_space (euclidean_space (fin n)) (sphere n) :=
{ atlas := begin sorry end,
chart_at := begin sorry end,
mem_chart_source := begin sorry end,
chart_mem_atlas := begin sorry end }
instance (n : ℕ) : smooth_manifold_with_corners (𝓡 n) (sphere n) :=
{ compatible := begin
assume e e' he he',
sorry
end }
-- smooth functions
def inc (n : ℕ) : sphere n → euclidean_space (fin (n+1)) :=
λ p : sphere n, (p : euclidean_space (fin (n+1)))
lemma inc_smooth (n : ℕ) : times_cont_mdiff (𝓡 n) (𝓡 (n+1)) ∞ (inc n) :=
begin
rw times_cont_mdiff_iff,
split,
{ exact continuous_subtype_coe, },
{ assume x y,
sorry }
end
lemma inc_continuous (n : ℕ) : continuous (inc n) :=
(inc_smooth n).continuous
lemma inc_mdifferentiable (n : ℕ) : mdifferentiable (𝓡 n) (𝓡 (n+1)) (inc n) :=
(inc_smooth n).mdifferentiable le_top
-- tangent space and tangent bundles
example (n : ℕ) (p : sphere n) (v : tangent_space (𝓡 n) p) :
tangent_bundle (𝓡 n) (sphere n) :=
⟨p, v⟩
-- tangent map, derivatives
example (n : ℕ) : times_cont_mdiff ((𝓡 n).prod (𝓡 n)) ((𝓡 (n+1)).prod (𝓡 (n+1))) ∞
(tangent_map (𝓡 n) (𝓡 (n+1)) (inc n)) :=
(inc_smooth n).times_cont_mdiff_tangent_map le_top
example (n : ℕ) (f : sphere n → sphere (n^2)) (p : sphere n) (v : tangent_space (𝓡 n) p) :
mfderiv (𝓡 n) (𝓡 (n^2)) f p v = (tangent_map (𝓡 n) (𝓡 (n^2)) f ⟨p, v⟩).2 :=
rfl
/- Can you express the sphere eversion theorem, i.e., the fact that there is a smooth isotopy
of immersions between the canonical embedding of the sphere `S^2` and `ℝ^3`, and the antipodal
embedding?
Note that we haven't defined immersions in mathlib, but you can jut require that the fiber
derivative is injective everywhere, which is easy to express if you know that the derivative
of a function `f` from a manifold of dimension `2` to a manifold of dimension `3` at a point `x` is
`mfderiv (𝓡 2) (𝓡 3) f x`.
Don't forget to require the global smoothness of the map! You may need to know that the interval
`[0,1]`, called `Icc (0 : ℝ) 1` in Lean, already has a manifold (with boundary!) structure,
where the corresponding model with corners is called `𝓡∂ 1`.
-/
theorem sphere_eversion :
∃ f : (Icc (0 : ℝ) 1) × sphere 2 → euclidean_space (fin 3),
times_cont_mdiff ((𝓡∂ 1).prod (𝓡 2)) (𝓡 3) ∞ f
∧ ∀ (t : (Icc (0 : ℝ) 1)), ∀ (p : sphere 2),
function.injective (mfderiv (𝓡 2) (𝓡 3) (f ∘ λ y, (t, y)) p)
∧ ∀ (p : sphere 2), f (0, p) = p
∧ ∀ (p : sphere 2), f (1, p) = - p :=
sorry
/- Dicussing three (controversial?) design decisions
#### Local homeos
What is a local homeo `f` between an open subset of `E` and an open subset of `F`?
1) a map defined on a subtype: `f x` only makes sense for `x : f.source`
2) a map defined on the whole space `E`, but taking values in `option F = F ∪ {junk}`, with
`f x = junk` when `x ∉ f.source`
3) a map defined on the whole space `E`, taking values in `F`, and we don't care about its values
outside of `f.source`.
Just like division by zero! But worse:
* issue with 1): you keep intersecting chart domains. But the subtype `u ∩ v` is not the same as
the subtype `v ∩ u`, so you keep adding casts everywhere
* issue with 2): if you want to say that a chart is smooth, then you define to define smooth functions
between `option E` and `option F` when `E` and `F` are vector spaces. All notions need to be
redefined with `option`.
* issue with 3): it works perfectly well, but it makes mathematicians unhappy/uneasy (and it is *not*
equivalent to 1) or 2) when one of the spaces is empty)
I picked 3)
#### Tangent vectors
What is a tangent vector (for a manifold `M` modelled on a vector space `E`)?
1) An equivalence class of germs of curves
2) A derivation
3) Physicist point of view: I don't know what a tangent vector is, but I know in charts.
Mathematician's interpretation: equivalence class of `(e, v)` where `e` is a chart at `x`, `v` a vector
in the vector space, and `(e, v) ∼ (e', v')` if `D(e' ∘ e ⁻¹) v = v'`
4) ...
Issues:
1) Pictures are pretty, but this doesn't bring anything compared to 3) when you go down to details.
And what about boundaries, where you can only have a half-curve
2) Need partitions of unity to show that this is local and coincides with the usual point of view.
Doesn't work well in finite smoothness, nor in complex manifolds
3) Fine, works in all situations, but requires a lot of work to define the equivalence classes,
the topology, check that the topology is compatible with the vector space structure, and so on.
In a vector space, the tangent space is not defeq to the vector space itself
4) Pick one favorite chart at `x`, say `e_x`, and *define* the tangent space at `x` to be `E`,
but "seen" in the chart `e_x` (this will show up in the definition of the derivative : the
derivative of `f : M → M'` at `x` is defined to be the derivative of the map
`e_{f x} ∘ f ∘ e_x⁻¹`). Works perfectly fine, but makes mathematicians unhappy/uneasy.
(Axiom of choice? In fact we put the choice of `e_x` in the *definition* of charted spaces,
so not further choice)
I picked 4)
#### Smooth functions in manifolds with boundary
Usual definition of smooth functions in a half space: extend to a smooth function a little bit
beyond the boundary, so one only really needs to speak of smooth functions in open subsets of
vector spaces.
When you define the derivative, you will need to check that it does not depend on the choice
of the extension. Even worse when you want to define the tangent bundle: choose an open extension
of your manifold with boundary, and then check that the restriction of the tangent bundle does
not depend on the choice of the extension. Very easy when handwaving, nightmare to formalize.
(What is the extension of the manifold with boundary? Another type?)
Instead, if you define derivatives in (non-open) domains, you can talk of smooth functions in
domains, and do everything without extending. Need to know this early enough: when starting to
define derivatives, you should already think of manifolds with boundaries! That's what we did
in mathlib.
Difficulty: if a domain `s` is too small (think `s = ℝ ⊆ ℝ^2`), the values of `f` on `s` do not
prescribe uniquely a derivative, so `fderiv_within_at ℝ f s x` may behave badly: derivative of
a sum might be different from sum of derivatives, as there is an arbitrary choice to be made.
This does not happen with the half-space, as it is large enough: derivatives within domains only
work well if the tangent directions span the whole space. Predicate `unique_diff_on` for sets
in vector spaces. You won't find this in books!
-/
/-! ## Exercises -/
/-! ### Local homeomorphisms
Local homeomorphisms are globally defined maps with a globally defined "inverse", but the only
relevant set is the *source*, which should be mapped homeomorphically to the *target*.
-/
-- set up a simple helper simp lemma to simplify our life later.
@[simp] lemma neg_mem_Ioo_minus_one_one (x : ℝ) : -x ∈ Ioo (-1 : ℝ) 1 ↔ x ∈ Ioo (-1 : ℝ) 1 :=
begin
-- sorry
simp [neg_lt, and_comm],
-- sorry
end
/- Define a local homeomorphism from `ℝ` to `ℝ` which is just `x ↦ -x`, but on `(-1, 1)`. In
Lean, the interval `(-1, 1)` is denoted by `Ioo (-1 : ℝ) 1` (where `o` stands for _open_). -/
def my_first_local_homeo : local_homeomorph ℝ ℝ :=
{ to_fun := λ x, -x,
inv_fun := λ x, -x,
source := Ioo (-1) 1,
target := /- inline sorry -/Ioo (-1) 1/- inline sorry -/,
map_source' :=
begin
-- sorry
assume x hx,
simp [hx],
-- sorry
end,
map_target' :=
begin
-- sorry
assume x hx,
simp [hx],
-- sorry
end,
left_inv' :=
begin
-- sorry
simp,
-- sorry
end,
right_inv' :=
begin
-- sorry
simp,
-- sorry
end,
open_source := /- inline sorry -/is_open_Ioo/- inline sorry -/,
open_target := /- inline sorry -/is_open_Ioo/- inline sorry -/,
continuous_to_fun := /- inline sorry -/continuous_neg.continuous_on/- inline sorry -/,
continuous_inv_fun := /- inline sorry -/continuous_neg.continuous_on/- inline sorry -/ }
/- Two simple lemmas that will prove useful below. You can leave them sorried if you like. -/
lemma ne_3_of_mem_Ioo {x : ℝ} (h : x ∈ Ioo (-1 : ℝ) 1) : x ≠ 3 :=
begin
-- sorry
exact ne_of_lt (lt_trans h.2 (by norm_num))
-- sorry
end
lemma neg_ne_3_of_mem_Ioo {x : ℝ} (h : x ∈ Ioo (-1 : ℝ) 1) : -x ≠ 3 :=
begin
-- sorry
assume h',
simp at h,
linarith,
-- sorry
end
/- Now, define a second local homeomorphism which is almost like the previous one. You may find the
following lemma useful for `continuous_to_fun`: -/
#check continuous_on.congr
def my_second_local_homeo : local_homeomorph ℝ ℝ :=
{ to_fun := λ x, if x = 3 then 0 else - x,
inv_fun := λ x, -x,
source := Ioo (-1) 1,
target := /- inline sorry -/Ioo (-1) 1/- inline sorry -/,
map_source' := /- inline sorry -/λ x hx, by simp [hx, ne_3_of_mem_Ioo hx]/- inline sorry -/,
map_target' := /- inline sorry -/λ x hx, by simp [hx]/- inline sorry -/,
left_inv' := /- inline sorry -/λ x hx, by simp [hx, ne_3_of_mem_Ioo hx]/- inline sorry -/,
right_inv' := /- inline sorry -/λ x hx, by simp [hx, neg_ne_3_of_mem_Ioo hx]/- inline sorry -/,
open_source := /- inline sorry -/is_open_Ioo/- inline sorry -/,
open_target := /- inline sorry -/is_open_Ioo/- inline sorry -/,
continuous_to_fun :=
begin
-- sorry
refine continuous_neg.continuous_on.congr (λ x hx, _),
simp [hx, ne_3_of_mem_Ioo hx],
-- sorry
end,
continuous_inv_fun := /- inline sorry -/continuous_neg.continuous_on/- inline sorry -/ }
/- Although the two above local homeos are the same for all practical purposes as they coincide
where relevant, they are not *equal*: -/
lemma my_first_local_homeo_ne_my_second_local_homeo :
my_first_local_homeo ≠ my_second_local_homeo :=
begin
-- sorry
assume h,
have : my_first_local_homeo 3 = my_second_local_homeo 3, by rw h,
simp [my_first_local_homeo, my_second_local_homeo] at this,
linarith,
-- sorry
end
/- The right equivalence relation for local homeos is not equality, but `eq_on_source`.
Indeed, the two local homeos we have defined above coincide from this point of view. -/
#check local_homeomorph.eq_on_source
lemma eq_on_source_my_first_local_homeo_my_second_local_homeo :
local_homeomorph.eq_on_source my_first_local_homeo my_second_local_homeo :=
begin
-- sorry
refine ⟨rfl, λ x hx, _⟩,
simp [my_first_local_homeo, my_second_local_homeo, ne_3_of_mem_Ioo hx],
-- sorry
end
/-! ### An example of a charted space structure on `ℝ`
A charted space is a topological space together with a set of local homeomorphisms to a model space,
whose sources cover the whole space. For instance, `ℝ` is already endowed with a charted space
structure with model space `ℝ`, where the unique chart is the identity:
-/
#check charted_space_self ℝ
/- For educational purposes only, we will put another charted space structure on `ℝ` using the
local homeomorphisms we have constructed above. To avoid using too much structure of `ℝ` (and to
avoid confusing Lean), we will work with a copy of `ℝ`, on which we will only register the
topology. -/
@[derive topological_space]
def myℝ : Type := ℝ
instance : charted_space ℝ myℝ :=
{ atlas := { local_homeomorph.refl ℝ, my_first_local_homeo },
chart_at := λ x, if x ∈ Ioo (-1 : ℝ) 1 then my_first_local_homeo else local_homeomorph.refl ℝ,
mem_chart_source :=
begin
-- sorry
assume x,
split_ifs,
{ exact h },
{ exact mem_univ _ }
-- sorry
end,
chart_mem_atlas :=
begin
-- sorry
assume x,
split_ifs;
simp,
-- sorry
end }
/- Now come more interesting bits. We have endowed `myℝ` with a charted space structure, with charts
taking values in `ℝ`. We want to say that this is a smooth structure, i.e., the changes of
coordinates are smooth. In Lean, this is written with `has_groupoid`. A groupoid is a set
of local homeomorphisms of the model space (for example, local homeos that are smooth on their
domain). A charted space admits the groupoid as a structure groupoid if all the changes of
coordinates belong to the groupoid.
There is a difficulty that the definitions are set up to be able to also speak of smooth manifolds
with boundary or with corners, so the name of the smooth groupoid on `ℝ` has the slightly strange
name `times_cont_diff_groupoid ∞ (model_with_corners_self ℝ ℝ)`. To avoid typing again and again
`model_with_corners_self ℝ ℝ`, let us introduce a shortcut
-/
abbreviation 𝓡1 := model_with_corners_self ℝ ℝ
/- In the library, there are such shortcuts for manifolds modelled on `ℝ^n`, denoted with `𝓡 n`,
but for `n = 1` this does not coincide with the above one, as `ℝ^1` (a.k.a. `fin 1 → ℝ`) is not
the same as `ℝ`! Still, since they are of the same nature, the notation we have just introduced
is very close, compare `𝓡1` with `𝓡 1` (and try not to get confused): -/
instance smooth_myℝ : has_groupoid myℝ (times_cont_diff_groupoid ∞ 𝓡1) :=
begin
-- in theory, we should prove that all compositions of charts are diffeos, i.e., they are smooth
-- and their inverse are smooth. For symmetry reasons, it suffices to check one direction
apply has_groupoid_of_pregroupoid,
-- take two charts `e` and `e'`
assume e e' he he',
-- if next line is a little bit slow for your taste, you can replace `simp` with `squeeze_simp`
-- and then follow the advice
simp [atlas] at he he',
dsimp,
-- to continue, some hints:
-- (1) don't hesitate to use the fact that the restriction of a smooth function to a
-- subset is still smooth there (`times_cont_diff.times_cont_diff_on`)
-- (2) hopefully, there is a theorem saying that the negation function is smooth.
-- you can either try to guess its name, or hope that `suggest` will help you there.
-- sorry
rcases he with rfl|rfl; rcases he' with rfl|rfl,
{ exact times_cont_diff_id.times_cont_diff_on },
{ exact times_cont_diff_id.neg.times_cont_diff_on },
{ exact times_cont_diff_id.neg.times_cont_diff_on },
{ convert times_cont_diff_id.times_cont_diff_on,
ext x,
simp [my_first_local_homeo], },
-- sorry
end
/- The statement of the previous instance is not very readable. There is a shortcut notation: -/
instance : smooth_manifold_with_corners 𝓡1 myℝ := {}
/- We will now study a very simple map from `myℝ` to `ℝ`, the identity. -/
def my_map : myℝ → ℝ := λ x, x
/- The map `my_map` is a map going from the type `myℝ` to the type `ℝ`. From the point of view of
the kernel of Lean, it is just the identity, but from the point of view of structures on `myℝ`
and `ℝ` it might not be trivial, as we have registered different instances on these two types. -/
/- The continuity should be trivial, as the topologies on `myℝ` and `ℝ` are definitionally the
same. So `continuous_id` might help. -/
lemma continuous_my_map : continuous my_map :=
-- sorry
continuous_id
-- sorry
/- Smoothness should not be obvious, though, as the manifold structures are not the same: the atlas
on `myℝ` has two elements, while the atlas on `ℝ` has one single element.
Note that `myℝ` is not a vector space, nor a normed space, so one can not ask whether `my_map`
is smooth in the usual sense (as a map between vector spaces): -/
-- lemma times_cont_diff_my_map : times_cont_diff ℝ ∞ my_map := sorry
/- does not make sense (try uncommenting it!) However, we can ask whether `my_map` is a smooth
map between manifolds, i.e., whether it is smooth when read in the charts. When we mention the
smoothness of a map, we should always specify explicitly the model with corners we are using,
because there might be several around (think of a complex manifold that you may want to consider
as a real manifold, to talk about functions which are real-smooth but not holomorphic) -/
lemma times_cont_mdiff_my_map : times_cont_mdiff 𝓡1 𝓡1 ∞ my_map :=
begin
-- put things in a nicer form. The simpset `mfld_simps` registers many simplification rules for
-- manifolds. `simp` is used heavily in manifold files to bring everything into manageable form.
rw times_cont_mdiff_iff,
simp only [continuous_my_map] with mfld_simps,
-- simp has erased the chart in the target, as it knows that the only chart in the manifold `ℝ`
-- is the identity.
assume x y,
-- sorry
simp [my_map, (∘), chart_at],
split_ifs,
{ exact times_cont_diff_id.neg.times_cont_diff_on },
{ exact times_cont_diff_id.times_cont_diff_on },
-- sorry
end
/- Now, let's go to tangent bundles. We have a smooth manifold, so its tangent bundle should also
be a smooth manifold. -/
-- the type `tangent_bundle 𝓡1 myℝ` makes sense
#check tangent_bundle 𝓡1 myℝ
/- The tangent space above a point of `myℝ` is just a one-dimensional vector space (identified with `ℝ`).
So, one can prescribe an element of the tangent bundle as a pair (more on this below) -/
example : tangent_bundle 𝓡1 myℝ := ((4 : ℝ), 0)
/- Construct the smooth manifold structure on the tangent bundle. Hint: the answer is a one-liner,
and this instance is not really needed. -/
instance tangent_bundle_myℝ : smooth_manifold_with_corners (𝓡1.prod 𝓡1) (tangent_bundle 𝓡1 myℝ) :=
-- sorry
by apply_instance
-- sorry
/-
NB: the model space for the tangent bundle to a product manifold or a tangent space is not
`ℝ × ℝ`, but a copy called `model_prod ℝ ℝ`. Otherwise, `ℝ × ℝ` would have two charted space
structures with model `ℝ × ℝ`, the identity one and the product one, which are not definitionally
equal. And this would be bad.
-/
#check tangent_bundle.charted_space 𝓡1 myℝ
/- A smooth map between manifolds induces a map between their tangent bundles. In `mathlib` this is
called the `tangent_map` (you might instead know it as the "differential" or "pushforward" of the
map). Let us check that the `tangent_map` of `my_map` is smooth. -/
lemma times_cont_mdiff_tangent_map_my_map :
times_cont_mdiff (𝓡1.prod 𝓡1) (𝓡1.prod 𝓡1) ∞ (tangent_map 𝓡1 𝓡1 my_map) :=
begin
-- hopefully, there is a theorem providing the general result, i.e. the tangent map to a smooth
-- map is smooth.
-- you can either try to guess its name, or hope that `suggest` will help you there.
-- sorry
exact times_cont_mdiff_my_map.times_cont_mdiff_tangent_map le_top,
-- sorry
end
/- (Harder question) Can you show that this tangent bundle is homeomorphic to `ℝ × ℝ`? You could
try to build the homeomorphism by hand, using `tangent_map 𝓡1 𝓡1 my_map` in one direction and a
similar map in the other direction, but it is probably more efficient to use one of the charts of
the tangent bundle.
Remember, the model space for `tangent_bundle 𝓡1 myℝ` is `model_prod ℝ ℝ`, not `ℝ × ℝ`. But the
topologies on `model_prod ℝ ℝ` and `ℝ × ℝ` are the same, so it is by definition good enough to
construct a homeomorphism with `model_prod ℝ ℝ`.
-/
def my_homeo : tangent_bundle 𝓡1 myℝ ≃ₜ (ℝ × ℝ) :=
begin
-- sorry
let p : tangent_bundle 𝓡1 myℝ := ((4 : ℝ), 0),
let F := chart_at (model_prod ℝ ℝ) p,
have A : ¬ ((4 : ℝ) < 1), by norm_num,
have S : F.source = univ, by simp [F, chart_at, A, @local_homeomorph.refl_source ℝ _],
have T : F.target = univ, by simp [F, chart_at, A, @local_homeomorph.refl_target ℝ _],
exact F.to_homeomorph_of_source_eq_univ_target_eq_univ S T,
-- sorry
end
/- Up to now, we have never used the definition of the tangent bundle, and this corresponds to
the usual mathematical practice: one doesn't care if the tangent space is defined using germs of
curves, or spaces of derivations, or whatever equivalent definition. Instead, one relies all the
time on functoriality (i.e., a smooth map has a well defined derivative, and they compose well,
together with the fact that the tangent bundle to a vector space is the product).
If you want to know more about the internals of the tangent bundle in mathlib, you can browse
through the next section, but it is maybe wiser to skip it on first reading, as it is not needed
to use the library
-/
section you_should_probably_skip_this
/- If `M` is a manifold modelled on a vector space `E`, then the underlying type for the tangent
bundle is just `M × E` -/
lemma tangent_bundle_myℝ_is_prod : tangent_bundle 𝓡1 myℝ = (myℝ × ℝ) :=
/- inline sorry -/rfl/- inline sorry -/
/- This means that you can specify a point in the tangent bundle as a pair `(x, y)`.
However, in general, a tangent bundle is not trivial: the topology on `tangent_bundle 𝓡1 myℝ` is *not*
the product topology. Instead, the tangent space at a point `x` is identified with `ℝ` through some
preferred chart at `x`, called `chart_at ℝ x`, but the way they are glued together depends on the
manifold and the charts.
In vector spaces, the tangent space is canonically the product space, with the same topology, as
there is only one chart so there is no strange gluing at play. The equality of the topologies
is given in `tangent_bundle_model_space_topology_eq_prod`, but they are not definitionally equal
so one can get strange behavior if abusing identifications.
Let us register the identification explicitly, as a homeomorphism:
-/
def tangent_bundle_vector_space_triv (E : Type u) [normed_group E] [normed_space ℝ E] :
tangent_bundle (model_with_corners_self ℝ E) E ≃ₜ E × E :=
{ to_fun := id,
inv_fun := id,
left_inv := /- inline sorry -/λ x, rfl/- inline sorry -/,
right_inv := /- inline sorry -/λ x, rfl/- inline sorry -/,
continuous_to_fun := begin
-- if you think that `continuous_id` should work but `exact continuous_id` fails, you
-- can try `convert continuous_id`: it might show you what doesn't match and let you
-- fix it afterwards.
-- sorry
convert continuous_id,
exact (tangent_bundle_model_space_topology_eq_prod _ _).symm
-- sorry
end,
continuous_inv_fun :=
begin
-- sorry
convert continuous_id,
exact (tangent_bundle_model_space_topology_eq_prod _ _)
-- sorry
end }
/- Even though the tangent bundle to `myℝ` is trivial abstractly, with this construction the
tangent bundle is *not* the product space with the product topology, as we have used various charts
so the gluing is not trivial. The following exercise unfolds the definition to see what is going on.
It is not a reasonable exercise, in the sense that one should never ever do this when working
with a manifold! -/
lemma crazy_formula_after_identifications (x : ℝ) (v : ℝ) :
let p : tangent_bundle 𝓡1 myℝ := ((3 : ℝ), 0) in
chart_at (model_prod ℝ ℝ) p (x, v) = if x ∈ Ioo (-1 : ℝ) 1 then (x, -v) else (x, v) :=
begin
-- this exercise is not easy (and shouldn't be: you are not supposed to use the library like this!)
-- if you really want to do this, you should unfold as much as you can using simp and dsimp, until you
-- are left with a statement speaking of derivatives of real functions, without any manifold code left.
-- sorry
have : ¬ ((3 : ℝ) < 1), by norm_num,
simp only [chart_at, this, mem_Ioo, if_false, and_false],
dsimp [tangent_bundle_core, basic_smooth_bundle_core.chart,
topological_fiber_bundle_core.local_triv, topological_fiber_bundle_core.local_triv',
topological_fiber_bundle_core.index_at,
basic_smooth_bundle_core.to_topological_fiber_bundle_core],
split_ifs,
{ simp only [chart_at, h, my_first_local_homeo, if_true, fderiv_within_univ, prod.mk.inj_iff, mem_Ioo,
fderiv_neg differentiable_at_id', fderiv_id', id.def, continuous_linear_map.coe_id',
continuous_linear_map.neg_apply] with mfld_simps },
{ simp only [chart_at, h, fderiv_within_univ, mem_Ioo, if_false, @local_homeomorph.refl_symm ℝ,
fderiv_id, continuous_linear_map.coe_id'] with mfld_simps }
-- sorry
end
end you_should_probably_skip_this
/-!
### The language of manifolds
In this paragraph, we will try to write down interesting statements of theorems, without proving them. The
goal here is that Lean should not complain on the statement, but the proof should be sorried.
-/
/- Here is a first example, already filled up, to show you how diffeomorphisms are currently named
(we will probably introduce an abbreviation, but this hasn't been done yet).
Don't try to fill the sorried proof! -/
/-- Two zero-dimensional connected manifolds are diffeomorphic. -/
theorem diffeomorph_of_zero_dim_connected
(M M' : Type*) [topological_space M] [topological_space M']
[charted_space (euclidean_space (fin 0)) M] [charted_space (euclidean_space (fin 0)) M']
[connected_space M] [connected_space M'] :
nonempty (structomorph (times_cont_diff_groupoid ∞ (𝓡 0)) M M') :=
sorry
/- Do you think that this statement is correct? (note that we have not assumed that our manifolds
are smooth, nor that they are separated, but this is maybe automatic in zero dimension).
Now, write down a version of this theorem in dimension 1, replacing the first sorry with meaningful content
(and adding what is needed before the colon).
Don't try to fill the sorried proof! -/
/-- Two one-dimensional smooth compact connected manifolds are diffeomorphic. -/
theorem diffeomorph_of_one_dim_compact_connected
-- omit
(M M' : Type*) [topological_space M] [topological_space M']
[charted_space (euclidean_space (fin 1)) M] [charted_space (euclidean_space (fin 1)) M']
[connected_space M] [connected_space M'] [compact_space M] [compact_space M']
[t2_space M] [t2_space M']
[smooth_manifold_with_corners (𝓡 1) M] [smooth_manifold_with_corners (𝓡 1) M']
-- omit
:
-- sorry
nonempty (structomorph (times_cont_diff_groupoid ∞ (𝓡 1)) M M')
-- sorry
:= sorry
/- You will definitely need to require smoothness and separation in this case, as it is wrong otherwise.
Note that Lean won't complain if you don't put these assumptions, as the theorem would still make
sense, but it would just turn out to be wrong.
The previous statement is not really satisfactory: we would instead like to express that any such
manifold is diffeomorphic to the circle. The trouble is that we don't have the circle as a smooth
manifold yet. Since we have cheated and introduced it (with sorries) at the beginning of the tutorial,
let's cheat again and use it to reformulate the previous statement.
-/
-- the next result is not trivial, leave it sorried (but you can work on it if you don't like
-- manifolds and prefer topology -- then please PR it to mathlib!).
instance connected_sphere (n : ℕ) : connected_space (sphere (n+1)) := sorry
/- The next two instances are easier to prove, you can prove them or leave them sorried
as you like. For the second one, you may need to use facts of the library such as -/
#check compact_iff_compact_space
#check metric.compact_iff_closed_bounded
instance (n : ℕ) : t2_space (sphere n) :=
begin
-- sorry
dunfold sphere,
apply_instance
-- sorry
end
instance (n : ℕ) : compact_space (sphere n) :=
begin
-- sorry
dunfold sphere,
apply compact_iff_compact_space.1,
rw metric.compact_iff_closed_bounded,
split,
{ exact metric.is_closed_sphere },
{ rw metric.bounded_iff_subset_ball (0 : euclidean_space (fin (n+1))),
exact ⟨1, metric.sphere_subset_closed_ball⟩ }
-- sorry
end
/- Now, you can prove that any one-dimensional compact connected manifold is diffeomorphic to
the circle. Here, you should fill the `sorry` (but luckily you may use
`diffeomorph_of_one_dim_compact_connected`). -/
theorem diffeomorph_circle_of_one_dim_compact_connected
(M : Type*) [topological_space M] [charted_space (euclidean_space (fin 1)) M]
[connected_space M] [compact_space M] [t2_space M] [smooth_manifold_with_corners (𝓡 1) M] :
nonempty (structomorph (times_cont_diff_groupoid ∞ (𝓡 1)) M (sphere 1)) :=
-- sorry
diffeomorph_of_one_dim_compact_connected M (sphere 1)
-- sorry
/- What about trying to say that there are uncountably many different smooth structures on `ℝ⁴`?
(see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exotic_R4). The library is not really designed with this in mind,
as in general we only work with one differentiable structure on a space, but it is perfectly
capable of expressing this fact if one uses the `@` version of some definitions.
Don't try to fill the sorried proof!
-/
theorem exotic_ℝ4 :
-- sorry
let E := (euclidean_space (fin 4)) in
∃ f : ℝ → charted_space E E,
∀ i, @has_groupoid E _ E _ (f i) (times_cont_diff_groupoid ∞ (𝓡 4))
∧ ∀ i j, nonempty (@structomorph _ _ (times_cont_diff_groupoid ∞ (𝓡 4)) E E _ _ (f i) (f j)) →
i = j
-- sorry
:=
sorry
/-!
### Smooth functions on `[0, 1]`
In this paragraph, you will prove several (math-trivial but Lean-nontrivial) statements on the smooth
structure of `[0,1]`. These facts should be Lean-trivial, but they are not (yet) since there is essentially
nothing in this direction for now in the library.
The goal is as much to be able to write the statements as to prove them. Most of the necessary vocabulary
has been introduced above, so don't hesitate to browse the file if you are stuck. Additionally, you will
need the notion of a smooth function on a subset: it is `times_cont_diff_on` for functions between vector
spaces and `times_cont_mdiff_on` for functions between manifolds.
Lemma times_cont_mdiff_g : the inclusion `g` of `[0, 1]` in `ℝ` is smooth.
Lemma msmooth_of_smooth : Consider a function `f : ℝ → [0, 1]`, which is smooth in the usual sense as a function
from `ℝ` to `ℝ` on a set `s`. Then it is manifold-smooth on `s`.
Definition : construct a function `f` from `ℝ` to `[0,1]` which is the identity on `[0, 1]`.
Theorem : the tangent bundle to `[0, 1]` is homeomorphic to `[0, 1] × ℝ`
Hint for Theorem 4: don't try to unfold the definition of the tangent bundle, it will only get you
into trouble. Instead, use the derivatives of the maps `f` and `g`, and rely on functoriality
to check that they are inverse to each other. (This advice is slightly misleading as these derivatives
do not go between the right spaces, so you will need to massage them a little bit).
A global advice: don't hesitate to use and abuse `simp`, it is the main workhorse in this
area of mathlib.
-/
/- After doing the exercise myself, I realized it was (way!) too hard. So I will give at least the statements
of the lemmas, to guide you a little bit more. To let you try the original version if you want,
I have left a big blank space to avoid spoilers. -/
def g : Icc (0 : ℝ) 1 → ℝ := subtype.val
-- smoothness results for `euclidean_space` are expressed for general `L^p` spaces
-- (as `euclidean_space` has the `L^2` norm), in:
#check pi_Lp.times_cont_diff_coord
#check pi_Lp.times_cont_diff_on_iff_coord
lemma times_cont_mdiff_g : times_cont_mdiff (𝓡∂ 1) 𝓡1 ∞ g :=
begin
-- sorry
rw times_cont_mdiff_iff,
refine ⟨continuous_subtype_val, λ x y, _⟩,
by_cases h : (x : ℝ) < 1,
{ simp only [g, chart_at, h, Icc_left_chart, function.comp, model_with_corners_euclidean_half_space,
add_zero, dif_pos, if_true, max_lt_iff, preimage_set_of_eq, sub_zero, subtype.range_coe_subtype,
subtype.coe_mk, subtype.val_eq_coe] with mfld_simps,
refine (pi_Lp.times_cont_diff_coord 0).times_cont_diff_on.congr (λ x hx, _),
simp only [mem_inter_eq, mem_set_of_eq] at hx,
simp only [hx, le_of_lt hx.right.left, min_eq_left, max_eq_left] },
{ simp only [chart_at, h, Icc_right_chart, function.comp, model_with_corners_euclidean_half_space, dif_pos,
max_lt_iff, preimage_set_of_eq, sub_zero, subtype.range_coe_subtype, if_false, subtype.coe_mk,
subtype.val_eq_coe, g] with mfld_simps,
have : times_cont_diff ℝ ⊤ (λ (x : euclidean_space (fin 1)), 1 - x 0) :=
times_cont_diff_const.sub (pi_Lp.times_cont_diff_coord 0),
apply this.times_cont_diff_on.congr (λ x hx, _),
simp only [mem_inter_eq, mem_set_of_eq] at hx,
have : 0 ≤ 1 - x 0, by linarith,
simp only [hx, this, max_eq_left] }
-- sorry
end
lemma msmooth_of_smooth {f : ℝ → Icc (0 : ℝ) 1} {s : set ℝ} (h : times_cont_diff_on ℝ ∞ (λ x, (f x : ℝ)) s) :
times_cont_mdiff_on 𝓡1 (𝓡∂ 1) ∞ f s :=
begin
-- sorry
rw times_cont_mdiff_on_iff,
split,
{ have : embedding (subtype.val : Icc (0 : ℝ) 1 → ℝ) := embedding_subtype_coe,
exact (embedding.continuous_on_iff this).2 h.continuous_on },
simp only with mfld_simps,
assume y,
by_cases hy : (y : ℝ) < 1,
{ simp [chart_at, model_with_corners_euclidean_half_space, (∘), hy, Icc_left_chart,
pi_Lp.times_cont_diff_on_iff_coord],
apply h.mono (inter_subset_left _ _) },
{ simp [chart_at, model_with_corners_euclidean_half_space, (∘), hy, Icc_right_chart,
pi_Lp.times_cont_diff_on_iff_coord],
assume i,
apply (times_cont_diff_on_const.sub h).mono (inter_subset_left _ _) }
-- sorry
end
/- A function from `ℝ` to `[0,1]` which is the identity on `[0,1]`. -/
def f : ℝ → Icc (0 : ℝ) 1 :=
λ x, ⟨max (min x 1) 0, by simp [le_refl, zero_le_one]⟩
lemma times_cont_mdiff_on_f : times_cont_mdiff_on 𝓡1 (𝓡∂ 1) ∞ f (Icc 0 1) :=
begin
-- sorry
apply msmooth_of_smooth,
apply times_cont_diff_id.times_cont_diff_on.congr,
assume x hx,
simp at hx,
simp [f, hx],
-- sorry
end
lemma fog : f ∘ g = id :=
begin
-- sorry
ext x,
rcases x with ⟨x', h'⟩,
simp at h',
simp [f, g, h'],
-- sorry
end
lemma gof : ∀ x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1, g (f x) = x :=
begin
-- sorry
assume x hx,
simp at hx,
simp [g, f],
simp [hx],
-- sorry
end
def G : tangent_bundle (𝓡∂ 1) (Icc (0 : ℝ) 1) → (Icc (0 : ℝ) 1) × ℝ :=
λ p, (p.1, (tangent_map (𝓡∂ 1) 𝓡1 g p).2)
lemma continuous_G : continuous G :=
begin
-- sorry
apply continuous.prod_mk (tangent_bundle_proj_continuous _ _),
refine continuous_snd.comp _,
have Z := times_cont_mdiff_g.continuous_tangent_map le_top,
convert Z,
exact (tangent_bundle_model_space_topology_eq_prod ℝ 𝓡1).symm
-- sorry
end
/- in the definition of `F`, we use the map `tangent_bundle_vector_space_triv`
(which is just the identity pointwise) to make sure that Lean is not lost
between the different topologies. -/
def F : (Icc (0 : ℝ) 1) × ℝ → tangent_bundle (𝓡∂ 1) (Icc (0 : ℝ) 1) :=
λ p, tangent_map_within 𝓡1 (𝓡∂ 1) f (Icc 0 1)
((tangent_bundle_vector_space_triv ℝ).symm (p.1, p.2))
lemma continuous_F : continuous F :=
begin
-- sorry
rw continuous_iff_continuous_on_univ,
apply (times_cont_mdiff_on_f.continuous_on_tangent_map_within le_top _).comp,
{ apply ((tangent_bundle_vector_space_triv ℝ).symm.continuous.comp _).continuous_on,
apply (continuous_subtype_coe.comp continuous_fst).prod_mk continuous_snd },
{ rintros ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, v⟩ _,
simp [tangent_bundle_vector_space_triv],
exact hx },
{ rw unique_mdiff_on_iff_unique_diff_on,
exact unique_diff_on_Icc_zero_one }
-- sorry
end
lemma FoG : F ∘ G = id :=
begin
-- sorry
ext1 p,
rcases p with ⟨x, v⟩,
simp [F, G, tangent_map_within, tangent_bundle_vector_space_triv, f],
dsimp,
split,
{ rcases x with ⟨x', h'⟩,
simp at h',
simp [h'] },
{ change (tangent_map_within 𝓡1 (𝓡∂ 1) f (Icc 0 1) (tangent_map (𝓡∂ 1) 𝓡1 g (x, v))).snd = v,
rw [← tangent_map_within_univ, ← tangent_map_within_comp_at, fog, tangent_map_within_univ, tangent_map_id],
{ refl },
{ apply times_cont_mdiff_on_f.mdifferentiable_on le_top,
simpa [g] using x.2 },
{ apply (times_cont_mdiff_g.times_cont_mdiff_at.mdifferentiable_at le_top).mdifferentiable_within_at },
{ assume z hz,
simpa [g] using z.2 },
{ apply unique_mdiff_on_univ _ (mem_univ _) } }
-- sorry
end
lemma GoF : G ∘ F = id :=
begin
-- sorry
ext1 p,
rcases p with ⟨x, v⟩,
simp [F, G, tangent_map_within, tangent_bundle_vector_space_triv, f],
dsimp,
split,
{ rcases x with ⟨x', h'⟩,
simp at h',
simp [h'] },
{ have A : unique_mdiff_within_at 𝓡1 (Icc 0 1) ((x : ℝ), v).fst,
{ rw unique_mdiff_within_at_iff_unique_diff_within_at,
apply unique_diff_on_Icc_zero_one _ x.2 },
change (tangent_map (𝓡∂ 1) 𝓡1 g (tangent_map_within 𝓡1 (𝓡∂ 1) f (Icc 0 1) (x, v))).snd = v,
rw [← tangent_map_within_univ, ← tangent_map_within_comp_at _ _ _ _ A],
{ have : tangent_map_within 𝓡1 𝓡1 (g ∘ f) (Icc 0 1) (x, v)
= tangent_map_within 𝓡1 𝓡1 id (Icc 0 1) (x, v) :=
tangent_map_within_congr gof _ x.2 A,
rw [this, tangent_map_within_id A] },
{ apply times_cont_mdiff_g.times_cont_mdiff_on.mdifferentiable_on le_top _ (mem_univ _) },
{ apply times_cont_mdiff_on_f.mdifferentiable_on le_top _ x.2 },
{ simp only [preimage_univ, subset_univ], } }
-- sorry
end
def my_tangent_homeo : tangent_bundle (𝓡∂ 1) (Icc (0 : ℝ) 1) ≃ₜ (Icc (0 : ℝ) 1) × ℝ :=
-- sorry
{ to_fun := G,
inv_fun := F,
continuous_to_fun := continuous_G,
continuous_inv_fun := continuous_F,
left_inv := λ p, show (F ∘ G) p = id p, by rw FoG,
right_inv := λ p, show (G ∘ F) p = id p, by rw GoF }
-- sorry
/-!
### Further things to do
1) can you prove `diffeomorph_of_zero_dim_connected` or `connected_sphere`?
2) Try to express and then prove the local inverse theorem in real manifolds: if a map between
real manifolds (without boundary, modelled on a complete vector space) is smooth, then it is
a local homeomorphism around each point. We already have versions of this statement in mathlib
for functions between vector spaces, but this is very much a work in progress.
3) What about trying to prove `diffeomorph_of_one_dim_compact_connected`? (I am not sure mathlib
is ready for this, as the proofs I am thinking of are currently a little bit too high-powered.
If you manage to do it, you should absolutely PR it!)
4) Why not contribute to the proof of `sphere_eversion`? You can have a look at
https://leanprover-community.github.io/sphere-eversion/ to learn more about this project
by Patrick Massot.
-/
|
b76e65d2be30f07e4555ec8275e753fe36d8df21 | 57c233acf9386e610d99ed20ef139c5f97504ba3 | /src/analysis/complex/real_deriv.lean | 8269ce29d863ed140259d36adfb6d468ba987070 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | robertylewis/mathlib | 3d16e3e6daf5ddde182473e03a1b601d2810952c | 1d13f5b932f5e40a8308e3840f96fc882fae01f0 | refs/heads/master | 1,651,379,945,369 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 98,875,504 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,644,253,514,000 | 1,501,495,700,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,483 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Yourong Zang
-/
import analysis.calculus.times_cont_diff
import analysis.complex.conformal
import analysis.calculus.conformal.normed_space
/-! # Real differentiability of complex-differentiable functions
`has_deriv_at.real_of_complex` expresses that, if a function on `ℂ` is differentiable (over `ℂ`),
then its restriction to `ℝ` is differentiable over `ℝ`, with derivative the real part of the
complex derivative.
`differentiable_at.conformal_at` states that a real-differentiable function with a nonvanishing
differential from the complex plane into an arbitrary complex-normed space is conformal at a point
if it's holomorphic at that point. This is a version of Cauchy-Riemann equations.
`conformal_at_iff_differentiable_at_or_differentiable_at_comp_conj` proves that a real-differential
function with a nonvanishing differential between the complex plane is conformal at a point if and
only if it's holomorphic or antiholomorphic at that point.
## TODO
* The classical form of Cauchy-Riemann equations
* On a connected open set `u`, a function which is `conformal_at` each point is either holomorphic
throughout or antiholomorphic throughout.
## Warning
We do NOT require conformal functions to be orientation-preserving in this file.
-/
section real_deriv_of_complex
/-! ### Differentiability of the restriction to `ℝ` of complex functions -/
open complex
variables {e : ℂ → ℂ} {e' : ℂ} {z : ℝ}
/-- If a complex function is differentiable at a real point, then the induced real function is also
differentiable at this point, with a derivative equal to the real part of the complex derivative. -/
theorem has_strict_deriv_at.real_of_complex (h : has_strict_deriv_at e e' z) :
has_strict_deriv_at (λx:ℝ, (e x).re) e'.re z :=
begin
have A : has_strict_fderiv_at (coe : ℝ → ℂ) of_real_clm z := of_real_clm.has_strict_fderiv_at,
have B : has_strict_fderiv_at e
((continuous_linear_map.smul_right 1 e' : ℂ →L[ℂ] ℂ).restrict_scalars ℝ)
(of_real_clm z) :=
h.has_strict_fderiv_at.restrict_scalars ℝ,
have C : has_strict_fderiv_at re re_clm (e (of_real_clm z)) := re_clm.has_strict_fderiv_at,
simpa using (C.comp z (B.comp z A)).has_strict_deriv_at
end
/-- If a complex function is differentiable at a real point, then the induced real function is also
differentiable at this point, with a derivative equal to the real part of the complex derivative. -/
theorem has_deriv_at.real_of_complex (h : has_deriv_at e e' z) :
has_deriv_at (λx:ℝ, (e x).re) e'.re z :=
begin
have A : has_fderiv_at (coe : ℝ → ℂ) of_real_clm z := of_real_clm.has_fderiv_at,
have B : has_fderiv_at e ((continuous_linear_map.smul_right 1 e' : ℂ →L[ℂ] ℂ).restrict_scalars ℝ)
(of_real_clm z) :=
h.has_fderiv_at.restrict_scalars ℝ,
have C : has_fderiv_at re re_clm (e (of_real_clm z)) := re_clm.has_fderiv_at,
simpa using (C.comp z (B.comp z A)).has_deriv_at
end
theorem times_cont_diff_at.real_of_complex {n : with_top ℕ} (h : times_cont_diff_at ℂ n e z) :
times_cont_diff_at ℝ n (λ x : ℝ, (e x).re) z :=
begin
have A : times_cont_diff_at ℝ n (coe : ℝ → ℂ) z,
from of_real_clm.times_cont_diff.times_cont_diff_at,
have B : times_cont_diff_at ℝ n e z := h.restrict_scalars ℝ,
have C : times_cont_diff_at ℝ n re (e z), from re_clm.times_cont_diff.times_cont_diff_at,
exact C.comp z (B.comp z A)
end
theorem times_cont_diff.real_of_complex {n : with_top ℕ} (h : times_cont_diff ℂ n e) :
times_cont_diff ℝ n (λ x : ℝ, (e x).re) :=
times_cont_diff_iff_times_cont_diff_at.2 $ λ x,
h.times_cont_diff_at.real_of_complex
variables {E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space ℂ E]
lemma has_strict_deriv_at.complex_to_real_fderiv' {f : ℂ → E} {x : ℂ} {f' : E}
(h : has_strict_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_strict_fderiv_at f (re_clm.smul_right f' + I • im_clm.smul_right f') x :=
by simpa only [complex.restrict_scalars_one_smul_right']
using h.has_strict_fderiv_at.restrict_scalars ℝ
lemma has_deriv_at.complex_to_real_fderiv' {f : ℂ → E} {x : ℂ} {f' : E} (h : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_fderiv_at f (re_clm.smul_right f' + I • im_clm.smul_right f') x :=
by simpa only [complex.restrict_scalars_one_smul_right']
using h.has_fderiv_at.restrict_scalars ℝ
lemma has_deriv_within_at.complex_to_real_fderiv' {f : ℂ → E} {s : set ℂ} {x : ℂ} {f' : E}
(h : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_fderiv_within_at f (re_clm.smul_right f' + I • im_clm.smul_right f') s x :=
by simpa only [complex.restrict_scalars_one_smul_right']
using h.has_fderiv_within_at.restrict_scalars ℝ
lemma has_strict_deriv_at.complex_to_real_fderiv {f : ℂ → ℂ} {f' x : ℂ}
(h : has_strict_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' • (1 : ℂ →L[ℝ] ℂ)) x :=
by simpa only [complex.restrict_scalars_one_smul_right]
using h.has_strict_fderiv_at.restrict_scalars ℝ
lemma has_deriv_at.complex_to_real_fderiv {f : ℂ → ℂ} {f' x : ℂ} (h : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_fderiv_at f (f' • (1 : ℂ →L[ℝ] ℂ)) x :=
by simpa only [complex.restrict_scalars_one_smul_right]
using h.has_fderiv_at.restrict_scalars ℝ
lemma has_deriv_within_at.complex_to_real_fderiv {f : ℂ → ℂ} {s : set ℂ} {f' x : ℂ}
(h : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_fderiv_within_at f (f' • (1 : ℂ →L[ℝ] ℂ)) s x :=
by simpa only [complex.restrict_scalars_one_smul_right]
using h.has_fderiv_within_at.restrict_scalars ℝ
end real_deriv_of_complex
section conformality
/-! ### Conformality of real-differentiable complex maps -/
open complex continuous_linear_map
open_locale complex_conjugate
variables
/-- A real differentiable function of the complex plane into some complex normed space `E` is
conformal at a point `z` if it is holomorphic at that point with a nonvanishing differential.
This is a version of the Cauchy-Riemann equations. -/
lemma differentiable_at.conformal_at {E : Type*}
[normed_group E] [normed_space ℝ E] [normed_space ℂ E]
{z : ℂ} {f : ℂ → E}
(hf' : fderiv ℝ f z ≠ 0) (h : differentiable_at ℂ f z) :
conformal_at f z :=
begin
rw conformal_at_iff_is_conformal_map_fderiv,
rw (h.has_fderiv_at.restrict_scalars ℝ).fderiv at ⊢ hf',
apply is_conformal_map_complex_linear,
contrapose! hf' with w,
simp [w]
end
/-- A complex function is conformal if and only if the function is holomorphic or antiholomorphic
with a nonvanishing differential. -/
lemma conformal_at_iff_differentiable_at_or_differentiable_at_comp_conj {f : ℂ → ℂ} {z : ℂ} :
conformal_at f z ↔
(differentiable_at ℂ f z ∨ differentiable_at ℂ (f ∘ conj) (conj z)) ∧ fderiv ℝ f z ≠ 0 :=
begin
rw conformal_at_iff_is_conformal_map_fderiv,
rw is_conformal_map_iff_is_complex_or_conj_linear,
apply and_congr_left,
intros h,
have h_diff := h.imp_symm fderiv_zero_of_not_differentiable_at,
apply or_congr,
{ rw differentiable_at_iff_restrict_scalars ℝ h_diff },
rw ← conj_conj z at h_diff,
rw differentiable_at_iff_restrict_scalars ℝ (h_diff.comp _ conj_cle.differentiable_at),
refine exists_congr (λ g, rfl.congr _),
have : fderiv ℝ conj (conj z) = _ := conj_cle.fderiv,
simp [fderiv.comp _ h_diff conj_cle.differentiable_at, this, conj_conj],
end
end conformality
|
465ba6a36c94e23585030e64b228471cd35aa198 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/analysis/analytic/composition.lean | eeeea5db90346c5c4fb5f7f5daf6bda740107a76 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 58,724 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Johan Commelin
-/
import analysis.analytic.basic
import combinatorics.composition
/-!
# Composition of analytic functions
In this file we prove that the composition of analytic functions is analytic.
The argument is the following. Assume `g z = ∑' qₙ (z, ..., z)` and `f y = ∑' pₖ (y, ..., y)`. Then
`g (f y) = ∑' qₙ (∑' pₖ (y, ..., y), ..., ∑' pₖ (y, ..., y))
= ∑' qₙ (p_{i₁} (y, ..., y), ..., p_{iₙ} (y, ..., y))`.
For each `n` and `i₁, ..., iₙ`, define a `i₁ + ... + iₙ` multilinear function mapping
`(y₀, ..., y_{i₁ + ... + iₙ - 1})` to
`qₙ (p_{i₁} (y₀, ..., y_{i₁-1}), p_{i₂} (y_{i₁}, ..., y_{i₁ + i₂ - 1}), ..., p_{iₙ} (....)))`.
Then `g ∘ f` is obtained by summing all these multilinear functions.
To formalize this, we use compositions of an integer `N`, i.e., its decompositions into
a sum `i₁ + ... + iₙ` of positive integers. Given such a composition `c` and two formal
multilinear series `q` and `p`, let `q.comp_along_composition p c` be the above multilinear
function. Then the `N`-th coefficient in the power series expansion of `g ∘ f` is the sum of these
terms over all `c : composition N`.
To complete the proof, we need to show that this power series has a positive radius of convergence.
This follows from the fact that `composition N` has cardinality `2^(N-1)` and estimates on
the norm of `qₙ` and `pₖ`, which give summability. We also need to show that it indeed converges to
`g ∘ f`. For this, we note that the composition of partial sums converges to `g ∘ f`, and that it
corresponds to a part of the whole sum, on a subset that increases to the whole space. By
summability of the norms, this implies the overall convergence.
## Main results
* `q.comp p` is the formal composition of the formal multilinear series `q` and `p`.
* `has_fpower_series_at.comp` states that if two functions `g` and `f` admit power series expansions
`q` and `p`, then `g ∘ f` admits a power series expansion given by `q.comp p`.
* `analytic_at.comp` states that the composition of analytic functions is analytic.
* `formal_multilinear_series.comp_assoc` states that composition is associative on formal
multilinear series.
## Implementation details
The main technical difficulty is to write down things. In particular, we need to define precisely
`q.comp_along_composition p c` and to show that it is indeed a continuous multilinear
function. This requires a whole interface built on the class `composition`. Once this is set,
the main difficulty is to reorder the sums, writing the composition of the partial sums as a sum
over some subset of `Σ n, composition n`. We need to check that the reordering is a bijection,
running over difficulties due to the dependent nature of the types under consideration, that are
controlled thanks to the interface for `composition`.
The associativity of composition on formal multilinear series is a nontrivial result: it does not
follow from the associativity of composition of analytic functions, as there is no uniqueness for
the formal multilinear series representing a function (and also, it holds even when the radius of
convergence of the series is `0`). Instead, we give a direct proof, which amounts to reordering
double sums in a careful way. The change of variables is a canonical (combinatorial) bijection
`composition.sigma_equiv_sigma_pi` between `(Σ (a : composition n), composition a.length)` and
`(Σ (c : composition n), Π (i : fin c.length), composition (c.blocks_fun i))`, and is described
in more details below in the paragraph on associativity.
-/
noncomputable theory
variables {𝕜 : Type*} {E F G H : Type*}
open filter list
open_locale topological_space big_operators classical nnreal ennreal
section topological
variables [comm_ring 𝕜] [add_comm_group E] [add_comm_group F] [add_comm_group G]
variables [module 𝕜 E] [module 𝕜 F] [module 𝕜 G]
variables [topological_space E] [topological_space F] [topological_space G]
/-! ### Composing formal multilinear series -/
namespace formal_multilinear_series
variables [topological_add_group E] [has_continuous_const_smul 𝕜 E]
variables [topological_add_group F] [has_continuous_const_smul 𝕜 F]
variables [topological_add_group G] [has_continuous_const_smul 𝕜 G]
/-!
In this paragraph, we define the composition of formal multilinear series, by summing over all
possible compositions of `n`.
-/
/-- Given a formal multilinear series `p`, a composition `c` of `n` and the index `i` of a
block of `c`, we may define a function on `fin n → E` by picking the variables in the `i`-th block
of `n`, and applying the corresponding coefficient of `p` to these variables. This function is
called `p.apply_composition c v i` for `v : fin n → E` and `i : fin c.length`. -/
def apply_composition
(p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) {n : ℕ} (c : composition n) :
(fin n → E) → (fin (c.length) → F) :=
λ v i, p (c.blocks_fun i) (v ∘ (c.embedding i))
lemma apply_composition_ones (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) (n : ℕ) :
p.apply_composition (composition.ones n) =
λ v i, p 1 (λ _, v (fin.cast_le (composition.length_le _) i)) :=
begin
funext v i,
apply p.congr (composition.ones_blocks_fun _ _),
intros j hjn hj1,
obtain rfl : j = 0, { linarith },
refine congr_arg v _,
rw [fin.ext_iff, fin.coe_cast_le, composition.ones_embedding, fin.coe_mk],
end
lemma apply_composition_single (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n)
(v : fin n → E) : p.apply_composition (composition.single n hn) v = λ j, p n v :=
begin
ext j,
refine p.congr (by simp) (λ i hi1 hi2, _),
dsimp,
congr' 1,
convert composition.single_embedding hn ⟨i, hi2⟩,
cases j,
have : j_val = 0 := le_bot_iff.1 (nat.lt_succ_iff.1 j_property),
unfold_coes,
congr; try { assumption <|> simp },
end
@[simp] lemma remove_zero_apply_composition
(p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) {n : ℕ} (c : composition n) :
p.remove_zero.apply_composition c = p.apply_composition c :=
begin
ext v i,
simp [apply_composition, zero_lt_one.trans_le (c.one_le_blocks_fun i), remove_zero_of_pos],
end
/-- Technical lemma stating how `p.apply_composition` commutes with updating variables. This
will be the key point to show that functions constructed from `apply_composition` retain
multilinearity. -/
lemma apply_composition_update
(p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) {n : ℕ} (c : composition n)
(j : fin n) (v : fin n → E) (z : E) :
p.apply_composition c (function.update v j z) =
function.update (p.apply_composition c v) (c.index j)
(p (c.blocks_fun (c.index j))
(function.update (v ∘ (c.embedding (c.index j))) (c.inv_embedding j) z)) :=
begin
ext k,
by_cases h : k = c.index j,
{ rw h,
let r : fin (c.blocks_fun (c.index j)) → fin n := c.embedding (c.index j),
simp only [function.update_same],
change p (c.blocks_fun (c.index j)) ((function.update v j z) ∘ r) = _,
let j' := c.inv_embedding j,
suffices B : (function.update v j z) ∘ r = function.update (v ∘ r) j' z,
by rw B,
suffices C : (function.update v (r j') z) ∘ r = function.update (v ∘ r) j' z,
by { convert C, exact (c.embedding_comp_inv j).symm },
exact function.update_comp_eq_of_injective _ (c.embedding _).injective _ _ },
{ simp only [h, function.update_eq_self, function.update_noteq, ne.def, not_false_iff],
let r : fin (c.blocks_fun k) → fin n := c.embedding k,
change p (c.blocks_fun k) ((function.update v j z) ∘ r) = p (c.blocks_fun k) (v ∘ r),
suffices B : (function.update v j z) ∘ r = v ∘ r, by rw B,
apply function.update_comp_eq_of_not_mem_range,
rwa c.mem_range_embedding_iff' }
end
@[simp] lemma comp_continuous_linear_map_apply_composition {n : ℕ}
(p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 F G) (f : E →L[𝕜] F) (c : composition n) (v : fin n → E) :
(p.comp_continuous_linear_map f).apply_composition c v = p.apply_composition c (f ∘ v) :=
by simp [apply_composition]
end formal_multilinear_series
namespace continuous_multilinear_map
open formal_multilinear_series
variables [topological_add_group E] [has_continuous_const_smul 𝕜 E]
variables [topological_add_group F] [has_continuous_const_smul 𝕜 F]
/-- Given a formal multilinear series `p`, a composition `c` of `n` and a continuous multilinear
map `f` in `c.length` variables, one may form a continuous multilinear map in `n` variables by
applying the right coefficient of `p` to each block of the composition, and then applying `f` to
the resulting vector. It is called `f.comp_along_composition p c`. -/
def comp_along_composition {n : ℕ}
(p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) (c : composition n)
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ (i : fin c.length), F) G) :
continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ i : fin n, E) G :=
{ to_fun := λ v, f (p.apply_composition c v),
map_add' := λ v i x y, by simp only [apply_composition_update,
continuous_multilinear_map.map_add],
map_smul' := λ v i c x, by simp only [apply_composition_update,
continuous_multilinear_map.map_smul],
cont := f.cont.comp $ continuous_pi $ λ i, (coe_continuous _).comp $ continuous_pi $ λ j,
continuous_apply _, }
@[simp] lemma comp_along_composition_apply {n : ℕ}
(p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) (c : composition n)
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ (i : fin c.length), F) G) (v : fin n → E) :
(f.comp_along_composition p c) v = f (p.apply_composition c v) := rfl
end continuous_multilinear_map
namespace formal_multilinear_series
variables [topological_add_group E] [has_continuous_const_smul 𝕜 E]
variables [topological_add_group F] [has_continuous_const_smul 𝕜 F]
variables [topological_add_group G] [has_continuous_const_smul 𝕜 G]
/-- Given two formal multilinear series `q` and `p` and a composition `c` of `n`, one may
form a continuous multilinear map in `n` variables by applying the right coefficient of `p` to each
block of the composition, and then applying `q c.length` to the resulting vector. It is
called `q.comp_along_composition p c`. -/
def comp_along_composition {n : ℕ}
(q : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 F G) (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F)
(c : composition n) : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ i : fin n, E) G :=
(q c.length).comp_along_composition p c
@[simp] lemma comp_along_composition_apply {n : ℕ}
(q : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 F G) (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F)
(c : composition n) (v : fin n → E) :
(q.comp_along_composition p c) v = q c.length (p.apply_composition c v) := rfl
/-- Formal composition of two formal multilinear series. The `n`-th coefficient in the composition
is defined to be the sum of `q.comp_along_composition p c` over all compositions of
`n`. In other words, this term (as a multilinear function applied to `v_0, ..., v_{n-1}`) is
`∑'_{k} ∑'_{i₁ + ... + iₖ = n} qₖ (p_{i_1} (...), ..., p_{i_k} (...))`, where one puts all variables
`v_0, ..., v_{n-1}` in increasing order in the dots.
In general, the composition `q ∘ p` only makes sense when the constant coefficient of `p` vanishes.
We give a general formula but which ignores the value of `p 0` instead.
-/
protected def comp (q : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 F G) (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) :
formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E G :=
λ n, ∑ c : composition n, q.comp_along_composition p c
/-- The `0`-th coefficient of `q.comp p` is `q 0`. Since these maps are multilinear maps in zero
variables, but on different spaces, we can not state this directly, so we state it when applied to
arbitrary vectors (which have to be the zero vector). -/
lemma comp_coeff_zero (q : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 F G) (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F)
(v : fin 0 → E) (v' : fin 0 → F) :
(q.comp p) 0 v = q 0 v' :=
begin
let c : composition 0 := composition.ones 0,
dsimp [formal_multilinear_series.comp],
have : {c} = (finset.univ : finset (composition 0)),
{ apply finset.eq_of_subset_of_card_le; simp [finset.card_univ, composition_card 0] },
rw [← this, finset.sum_singleton, comp_along_composition_apply],
symmetry, congr'
end
@[simp] lemma comp_coeff_zero'
(q : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 F G) (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) (v : fin 0 → E) :
(q.comp p) 0 v = q 0 (λ i, 0) :=
q.comp_coeff_zero p v _
/-- The `0`-th coefficient of `q.comp p` is `q 0`. When `p` goes from `E` to `E`, this can be
expressed as a direct equality -/
lemma comp_coeff_zero'' (q : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F)
(p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E E) :
(q.comp p) 0 = q 0 :=
by { ext v, exact q.comp_coeff_zero p _ _ }
/-- The first coefficient of a composition of formal multilinear series is the composition of the
first coefficients seen as continuous linear maps. -/
lemma comp_coeff_one (q : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 F G) (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F)
(v : fin 1 → E) : (q.comp p) 1 v = q 1 (λ i, p 1 v) :=
begin
have : {composition.ones 1} = (finset.univ : finset (composition 1)) :=
finset.eq_univ_of_card _ (by simp [composition_card]),
simp only [formal_multilinear_series.comp, comp_along_composition_apply, ← this,
finset.sum_singleton],
refine q.congr (by simp) (λ i hi1 hi2, _),
simp only [apply_composition_ones],
exact p.congr rfl (λ j hj1 hj2, by congr)
end
/-- Only `0`-th coefficient of `q.comp p` depends on `q 0`. -/
lemma remove_zero_comp_of_pos (q : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 F G)
(p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
q.remove_zero.comp p n = q.comp p n :=
begin
ext v,
simp only [formal_multilinear_series.comp, comp_along_composition,
continuous_multilinear_map.comp_along_composition_apply, continuous_multilinear_map.sum_apply],
apply finset.sum_congr rfl (λ c hc, _),
rw remove_zero_of_pos _ (c.length_pos_of_pos hn)
end
@[simp] lemma comp_remove_zero (q : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 F G)
(p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) :
q.comp p.remove_zero = q.comp p :=
by { ext n, simp [formal_multilinear_series.comp] }
end formal_multilinear_series
end topological
variables [nontrivially_normed_field 𝕜]
[normed_add_comm_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E]
[normed_add_comm_group F] [normed_space 𝕜 F]
[normed_add_comm_group G] [normed_space 𝕜 G]
[normed_add_comm_group H] [normed_space 𝕜 H]
namespace formal_multilinear_series
/-- The norm of `f.comp_along_composition p c` is controlled by the product of
the norms of the relevant bits of `f` and `p`. -/
lemma comp_along_composition_bound {n : ℕ}
(p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) (c : composition n)
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ (i : fin c.length), F) G) (v : fin n → E) :
‖f.comp_along_composition p c v‖ ≤
‖f‖ * (∏ i, ‖p (c.blocks_fun i)‖) * (∏ i : fin n, ‖v i‖) :=
calc ‖f.comp_along_composition p c v‖ = ‖f (p.apply_composition c v)‖ : rfl
... ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖p.apply_composition c v i‖ : continuous_multilinear_map.le_op_norm _ _
... ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖p (c.blocks_fun i)‖ *
∏ j : fin (c.blocks_fun i), ‖(v ∘ (c.embedding i)) j‖ :
begin
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ (norm_nonneg _),
refine finset.prod_le_prod (λ i hi, norm_nonneg _) (λ i hi, _),
apply continuous_multilinear_map.le_op_norm,
end
... = ‖f‖ * (∏ i, ‖p (c.blocks_fun i)‖) *
∏ i (j : fin (c.blocks_fun i)), ‖(v ∘ (c.embedding i)) j‖ :
by rw [finset.prod_mul_distrib, mul_assoc]
... = ‖f‖ * (∏ i, ‖p (c.blocks_fun i)‖) * (∏ i : fin n, ‖v i‖) :
by { rw [← c.blocks_fin_equiv.prod_comp, ← finset.univ_sigma_univ, finset.prod_sigma],
congr }
/-- The norm of `q.comp_along_composition p c` is controlled by the product of
the norms of the relevant bits of `q` and `p`. -/
lemma comp_along_composition_norm {n : ℕ}
(q : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 F G) (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F)
(c : composition n) :
‖q.comp_along_composition p c‖ ≤ ‖q c.length‖ * ∏ i, ‖p (c.blocks_fun i)‖ :=
continuous_multilinear_map.op_norm_le_bound _
(mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (finset.prod_nonneg (λ i hi, norm_nonneg _)))
(comp_along_composition_bound _ _ _)
lemma comp_along_composition_nnnorm {n : ℕ}
(q : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 F G) (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F)
(c : composition n) :
‖q.comp_along_composition p c‖₊ ≤ ‖q c.length‖₊ * ∏ i, ‖p (c.blocks_fun i)‖₊ :=
by { rw ← nnreal.coe_le_coe, push_cast, exact q.comp_along_composition_norm p c }
/-!
### The identity formal power series
We will now define the identity power series, and show that it is a neutral element for left and
right composition.
-/
section
variables (𝕜 E)
/-- The identity formal multilinear series, with all coefficients equal to `0` except for `n = 1`
where it is (the continuous multilinear version of) the identity. -/
def id : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E E
| 0 := 0
| 1 := (continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1 𝕜 E E).symm (continuous_linear_map.id 𝕜 E)
| _ := 0
/-- The first coefficient of `id 𝕜 E` is the identity. -/
@[simp] lemma id_apply_one (v : fin 1 → E) : (formal_multilinear_series.id 𝕜 E) 1 v = v 0 := rfl
/-- The `n`th coefficient of `id 𝕜 E` is the identity when `n = 1`. We state this in a dependent
way, as it will often appear in this form. -/
lemma id_apply_one' {n : ℕ} (h : n = 1) (v : fin n → E) :
(id 𝕜 E) n v = v ⟨0, h.symm ▸ zero_lt_one⟩ :=
begin
subst n,
apply id_apply_one
end
/-- For `n ≠ 1`, the `n`-th coefficient of `id 𝕜 E` is zero, by definition. -/
@[simp] lemma id_apply_ne_one {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 1) : (formal_multilinear_series.id 𝕜 E) n = 0 :=
by { cases n, { refl }, cases n, { contradiction }, refl }
end
@[simp] theorem comp_id (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) : p.comp (id 𝕜 E) = p :=
begin
ext1 n,
dsimp [formal_multilinear_series.comp],
rw finset.sum_eq_single (composition.ones n),
show comp_along_composition p (id 𝕜 E) (composition.ones n) = p n,
{ ext v,
rw comp_along_composition_apply,
apply p.congr (composition.ones_length n),
intros,
rw apply_composition_ones,
refine congr_arg v _,
rw [fin.ext_iff, fin.coe_cast_le, fin.coe_mk, fin.coe_mk], },
show ∀ (b : composition n),
b ∈ finset.univ → b ≠ composition.ones n → comp_along_composition p (id 𝕜 E) b = 0,
{ assume b _ hb,
obtain ⟨k, hk, lt_k⟩ : ∃ (k : ℕ) (H : k ∈ composition.blocks b), 1 < k :=
composition.ne_ones_iff.1 hb,
obtain ⟨i, i_lt, hi⟩ : ∃ (i : ℕ) (h : i < b.blocks.length), b.blocks.nth_le i h = k :=
nth_le_of_mem hk,
let j : fin b.length := ⟨i, b.blocks_length ▸ i_lt⟩,
have A : 1 < b.blocks_fun j := by convert lt_k,
ext v,
rw [comp_along_composition_apply, continuous_multilinear_map.zero_apply],
apply continuous_multilinear_map.map_coord_zero _ j,
dsimp [apply_composition],
rw id_apply_ne_one _ _ (ne_of_gt A),
refl },
{ simp }
end
@[simp] theorem id_comp (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) (h : p 0 = 0) : (id 𝕜 F).comp p = p :=
begin
ext1 n,
by_cases hn : n = 0,
{ rw [hn, h],
ext v,
rw [comp_coeff_zero', id_apply_ne_one _ _ zero_ne_one],
refl },
{ dsimp [formal_multilinear_series.comp],
have n_pos : 0 < n := bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr hn,
rw finset.sum_eq_single (composition.single n n_pos),
show comp_along_composition (id 𝕜 F) p (composition.single n n_pos) = p n,
{ ext v,
rw [comp_along_composition_apply, id_apply_one' _ _ (composition.single_length n_pos)],
dsimp [apply_composition],
refine p.congr rfl (λ i him hin, congr_arg v $ _),
ext, simp },
show ∀ (b : composition n),
b ∈ finset.univ → b ≠ composition.single n n_pos → comp_along_composition (id 𝕜 F) p b = 0,
{ assume b _ hb,
have A : b.length ≠ 1, by simpa [composition.eq_single_iff_length] using hb,
ext v,
rw [comp_along_composition_apply, id_apply_ne_one _ _ A],
refl },
{ simp } }
end
/-! ### Summability properties of the composition of formal power series-/
section
/-- If two formal multilinear series have positive radius of convergence, then the terms appearing
in the definition of their composition are also summable (when multiplied by a suitable positive
geometric term). -/
theorem comp_summable_nnreal
(q : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 F G) (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F)
(hq : 0 < q.radius) (hp : 0 < p.radius) :
∃ r > (0 : ℝ≥0),
summable (λ i : Σ n, composition n, ‖q.comp_along_composition p i.2‖₊ * r ^ i.1) :=
begin
/- This follows from the fact that the growth rate of `‖qₙ‖` and `‖pₙ‖` is at most geometric,
giving a geometric bound on each `‖q.comp_along_composition p op‖`, together with the
fact that there are `2^(n-1)` compositions of `n`, giving at most a geometric loss. -/
rcases ennreal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 (lt_min ennreal.zero_lt_one hq) with ⟨rq, rq_pos, hrq⟩,
rcases ennreal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 (lt_min ennreal.zero_lt_one hp) with ⟨rp, rp_pos, hrp⟩,
simp only [lt_min_iff, ennreal.coe_lt_one_iff, ennreal.coe_pos] at hrp hrq rp_pos rq_pos,
obtain ⟨Cq, hCq0, hCq⟩ : ∃ Cq > 0, ∀ n, ‖q n‖₊ * rq^n ≤ Cq :=
q.nnnorm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius hrq.2,
obtain ⟨Cp, hCp1, hCp⟩ : ∃ Cp ≥ 1, ∀ n, ‖p n‖₊ * rp^n ≤ Cp,
{ rcases p.nnnorm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius hrp.2 with ⟨Cp, -, hCp⟩,
exact ⟨max Cp 1, le_max_right _ _, λ n, (hCp n).trans (le_max_left _ _)⟩ },
let r0 : ℝ≥0 := (4 * Cp)⁻¹,
have r0_pos : 0 < r0 := nnreal.inv_pos.2 (mul_pos zero_lt_four (zero_lt_one.trans_le hCp1)),
set r : ℝ≥0 := rp * rq * r0,
have r_pos : 0 < r := mul_pos (mul_pos rp_pos rq_pos) r0_pos,
have I : ∀ (i : Σ (n : ℕ), composition n),
‖q.comp_along_composition p i.2‖₊ * r ^ i.1 ≤ Cq / 4 ^ i.1,
{ rintros ⟨n, c⟩,
have A,
calc ‖q c.length‖₊ * rq ^ n ≤ ‖q c.length‖₊* rq ^ c.length :
mul_le_mul' le_rfl (pow_le_pow_of_le_one rq.2 hrq.1.le c.length_le)
... ≤ Cq : hCq _,
have B,
calc ((∏ i, ‖p (c.blocks_fun i)‖₊) * rp ^ n)
= ∏ i, ‖p (c.blocks_fun i)‖₊ * rp ^ c.blocks_fun i :
by simp only [finset.prod_mul_distrib, finset.prod_pow_eq_pow_sum, c.sum_blocks_fun]
... ≤ ∏ i : fin c.length, Cp : finset.prod_le_prod' (λ i _, hCp _)
... = Cp ^ c.length : by simp
... ≤ Cp ^ n : pow_le_pow hCp1 c.length_le,
calc ‖q.comp_along_composition p c‖₊ * r ^ n
≤ (‖q c.length‖₊ * ∏ i, ‖p (c.blocks_fun i)‖₊) * r ^ n :
mul_le_mul' (q.comp_along_composition_nnnorm p c) le_rfl
... = (‖q c.length‖₊ * rq ^ n) * ((∏ i, ‖p (c.blocks_fun i)‖₊) * rp ^ n) * r0 ^ n :
by { simp only [r, mul_pow], ring }
... ≤ Cq * Cp ^ n * r0 ^ n : mul_le_mul' (mul_le_mul' A B) le_rfl
... = Cq / 4 ^ n :
begin
simp only [r0],
field_simp [mul_pow, (zero_lt_one.trans_le hCp1).ne'],
ring
end },
refine ⟨r, r_pos, nnreal.summable_of_le I _⟩,
simp_rw div_eq_mul_inv,
refine summable.mul_left _ _,
have : ∀ n : ℕ, has_sum (λ c : composition n, (4 ^ n : ℝ≥0)⁻¹) (2 ^ (n - 1) / 4 ^ n),
{ intro n,
convert has_sum_fintype (λ c : composition n, (4 ^ n : ℝ≥0)⁻¹),
simp [finset.card_univ, composition_card, div_eq_mul_inv] },
refine nnreal.summable_sigma.2 ⟨λ n, (this n).summable, (nnreal.summable_nat_add_iff 1).1 _⟩,
convert (nnreal.summable_geometric (nnreal.div_lt_one_of_lt one_lt_two)).mul_left (1 / 4),
ext1 n,
rw [(this _).tsum_eq, add_tsub_cancel_right],
field_simp [← mul_assoc, pow_succ', mul_pow, show (4 : ℝ≥0) = 2 * 2, from (two_mul 2).symm,
mul_right_comm]
end
end
/-- Bounding below the radius of the composition of two formal multilinear series assuming
summability over all compositions. -/
theorem le_comp_radius_of_summable
(q : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 F G) (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) (r : ℝ≥0)
(hr : summable (λ i : (Σ n, composition n), ‖q.comp_along_composition p i.2‖₊ * r ^ i.1)) :
(r : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ (q.comp p).radius :=
begin
refine le_radius_of_bound_nnreal _
(∑' i : (Σ n, composition n), ‖comp_along_composition q p i.snd‖₊ * r ^ i.fst) (λ n, _),
calc ‖formal_multilinear_series.comp q p n‖₊ * r ^ n ≤
∑' (c : composition n), ‖comp_along_composition q p c‖₊ * r ^ n :
begin
rw [tsum_fintype, ← finset.sum_mul],
exact mul_le_mul' (nnnorm_sum_le _ _) le_rfl
end
... ≤ ∑' (i : Σ (n : ℕ), composition n), ‖comp_along_composition q p i.snd‖₊ * r ^ i.fst :
nnreal.tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_inj hr sigma_mk_injective
end
/-!
### Composing analytic functions
Now, we will prove that the composition of the partial sums of `q` and `p` up to order `N` is
given by a sum over some large subset of `Σ n, composition n` of `q.comp_along_composition p`, to
deduce that the series for `q.comp p` indeed converges to `g ∘ f` when `q` is a power series for
`g` and `p` is a power series for `f`.
This proof is a big reindexing argument of a sum. Since it is a bit involved, we define first
the source of the change of variables (`comp_partial_source`), its target
(`comp_partial_target`) and the change of variables itself (`comp_change_of_variables`) before
giving the main statement in `comp_partial_sum`. -/
/-- Source set in the change of variables to compute the composition of partial sums of formal
power series.
See also `comp_partial_sum`. -/
def comp_partial_sum_source (m M N : ℕ) : finset (Σ n, (fin n) → ℕ) :=
finset.sigma (finset.Ico m M) (λ (n : ℕ), fintype.pi_finset (λ (i : fin n), finset.Ico 1 N) : _)
@[simp] lemma mem_comp_partial_sum_source_iff (m M N : ℕ) (i : Σ n, (fin n) → ℕ) :
i ∈ comp_partial_sum_source m M N ↔
(m ≤ i.1 ∧ i.1 < M) ∧ ∀ (a : fin i.1), 1 ≤ i.2 a ∧ i.2 a < N :=
by simp only [comp_partial_sum_source, finset.mem_Ico, fintype.mem_pi_finset, finset.mem_sigma,
iff_self]
/-- Change of variables appearing to compute the composition of partial sums of formal
power series -/
def comp_change_of_variables (m M N : ℕ) (i : Σ n, (fin n) → ℕ)
(hi : i ∈ comp_partial_sum_source m M N) : (Σ n, composition n) :=
begin
rcases i with ⟨n, f⟩,
rw mem_comp_partial_sum_source_iff at hi,
refine ⟨∑ j, f j, of_fn (λ a, f a), λ i hi', _, by simp [sum_of_fn]⟩,
obtain ⟨j, rfl⟩ : ∃ (j : fin n), f j = i, by rwa [mem_of_fn, set.mem_range] at hi',
exact (hi.2 j).1
end
@[simp] lemma comp_change_of_variables_length
(m M N : ℕ) {i : Σ n, (fin n) → ℕ} (hi : i ∈ comp_partial_sum_source m M N) :
composition.length (comp_change_of_variables m M N i hi).2 = i.1 :=
begin
rcases i with ⟨k, blocks_fun⟩,
dsimp [comp_change_of_variables],
simp only [composition.length, map_of_fn, length_of_fn]
end
lemma comp_change_of_variables_blocks_fun
(m M N : ℕ) {i : Σ n, (fin n) → ℕ} (hi : i ∈ comp_partial_sum_source m M N) (j : fin i.1) :
(comp_change_of_variables m M N i hi).2.blocks_fun
⟨j, (comp_change_of_variables_length m M N hi).symm ▸ j.2⟩ = i.2 j :=
begin
rcases i with ⟨n, f⟩,
dsimp [composition.blocks_fun, composition.blocks, comp_change_of_variables],
simp only [map_of_fn, nth_le_of_fn', function.comp_app],
apply congr_arg,
exact fin.eta _ _
end
/-- Target set in the change of variables to compute the composition of partial sums of formal
power series, here given a a set. -/
def comp_partial_sum_target_set (m M N : ℕ) : set (Σ n, composition n) :=
{i | (m ≤ i.2.length) ∧ (i.2.length < M) ∧ (∀ (j : fin i.2.length), i.2.blocks_fun j < N)}
lemma comp_partial_sum_target_subset_image_comp_partial_sum_source
(m M N : ℕ) (i : Σ n, composition n) (hi : i ∈ comp_partial_sum_target_set m M N) :
∃ j (hj : j ∈ comp_partial_sum_source m M N), i = comp_change_of_variables m M N j hj :=
begin
rcases i with ⟨n, c⟩,
refine ⟨⟨c.length, c.blocks_fun⟩, _, _⟩,
{ simp only [comp_partial_sum_target_set, set.mem_set_of_eq] at hi,
simp only [mem_comp_partial_sum_source_iff, hi.left, hi.right, true_and, and_true],
exact λ a, c.one_le_blocks' _ },
{ dsimp [comp_change_of_variables],
rw composition.sigma_eq_iff_blocks_eq,
simp only [composition.blocks_fun, composition.blocks, subtype.coe_eta, nth_le_map'],
conv_lhs { rw ← of_fn_nth_le c.blocks } }
end
/-- Target set in the change of variables to compute the composition of partial sums of formal
power series, here given a a finset.
See also `comp_partial_sum`. -/
def comp_partial_sum_target (m M N : ℕ) : finset (Σ n, composition n) :=
set.finite.to_finset $ ((finset.finite_to_set _).dependent_image _).subset $
comp_partial_sum_target_subset_image_comp_partial_sum_source m M N
@[simp] lemma mem_comp_partial_sum_target_iff {m M N : ℕ} {a : Σ n, composition n} :
a ∈ comp_partial_sum_target m M N ↔
m ≤ a.2.length ∧ a.2.length < M ∧ (∀ (j : fin a.2.length), a.2.blocks_fun j < N) :=
by simp [comp_partial_sum_target, comp_partial_sum_target_set]
/-- `comp_change_of_variables m M N` is a bijection between `comp_partial_sum_source m M N`
and `comp_partial_sum_target m M N`, yielding equal sums for functions that correspond to each
other under the bijection. As `comp_change_of_variables m M N` is a dependent function, stating
that it is a bijection is not directly possible, but the consequence on sums can be stated
more easily. -/
lemma comp_change_of_variables_sum {α : Type*} [add_comm_monoid α] (m M N : ℕ)
(f : (Σ (n : ℕ), fin n → ℕ) → α) (g : (Σ n, composition n) → α)
(h : ∀ e (he : e ∈ comp_partial_sum_source m M N),
f e = g (comp_change_of_variables m M N e he)) :
∑ e in comp_partial_sum_source m M N, f e = ∑ e in comp_partial_sum_target m M N, g e :=
begin
apply finset.sum_bij (comp_change_of_variables m M N),
-- We should show that the correspondance we have set up is indeed a bijection
-- between the index sets of the two sums.
-- 1 - show that the image belongs to `comp_partial_sum_target m N N`
{ rintros ⟨k, blocks_fun⟩ H,
rw mem_comp_partial_sum_source_iff at H,
simp only [mem_comp_partial_sum_target_iff, composition.length, composition.blocks, H.left,
map_of_fn, length_of_fn, true_and, comp_change_of_variables],
assume j,
simp only [composition.blocks_fun, (H.right _).right, nth_le_of_fn'] },
-- 2 - show that the composition gives the `comp_along_composition` application
{ rintros ⟨k, blocks_fun⟩ H,
rw h },
-- 3 - show that the map is injective
{ rintros ⟨k, blocks_fun⟩ ⟨k', blocks_fun'⟩ H H' heq,
obtain rfl : k = k',
{ have := (comp_change_of_variables_length m M N H).symm,
rwa [heq, comp_change_of_variables_length] at this, },
congr,
funext i,
calc blocks_fun i = (comp_change_of_variables m M N _ H).2.blocks_fun _ :
(comp_change_of_variables_blocks_fun m M N H i).symm
... = (comp_change_of_variables m M N _ H').2.blocks_fun _ :
begin
apply composition.blocks_fun_congr; try { rw heq },
refl
end
... = blocks_fun' i : comp_change_of_variables_blocks_fun m M N H' i },
-- 4 - show that the map is surjective
{ assume i hi,
apply comp_partial_sum_target_subset_image_comp_partial_sum_source m M N i,
simpa [comp_partial_sum_target] using hi }
end
/-- The auxiliary set corresponding to the composition of partial sums asymptotically contains
all possible compositions. -/
lemma comp_partial_sum_target_tendsto_at_top :
tendsto (λ N, comp_partial_sum_target 0 N N) at_top at_top :=
begin
apply monotone.tendsto_at_top_finset,
{ assume m n hmn a ha,
have : ∀ i, i < m → i < n := λ i hi, lt_of_lt_of_le hi hmn,
tidy },
{ rintros ⟨n, c⟩,
simp only [mem_comp_partial_sum_target_iff],
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : bdd_above ↑(finset.univ.image (λ (i : fin c.length), c.blocks_fun i)) :=
finset.bdd_above _,
refine ⟨max n c.length + 1, bot_le, lt_of_le_of_lt (le_max_right n c.length) (lt_add_one _),
λ j, lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans _ (le_max_left _ _)) (lt_add_one _)⟩,
apply hn,
simp only [finset.mem_image_of_mem, finset.mem_coe, finset.mem_univ] }
end
/-- Composing the partial sums of two multilinear series coincides with the sum over all
compositions in `comp_partial_sum_target 0 N N`. This is precisely the motivation for the
definition of `comp_partial_sum_target`. -/
lemma comp_partial_sum
(q : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 F G) (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) (N : ℕ) (z : E) :
q.partial_sum N (∑ i in finset.Ico 1 N, p i (λ j, z)) =
∑ i in comp_partial_sum_target 0 N N, q.comp_along_composition p i.2 (λ j, z) :=
begin
-- we expand the composition, using the multilinearity of `q` to expand along each coordinate.
suffices H : ∑ n in finset.range N, ∑ r in fintype.pi_finset (λ (i : fin n), finset.Ico 1 N),
q n (λ (i : fin n), p (r i) (λ j, z)) =
∑ i in comp_partial_sum_target 0 N N, q.comp_along_composition p i.2 (λ j, z),
by simpa only [formal_multilinear_series.partial_sum,
continuous_multilinear_map.map_sum_finset] using H,
-- rewrite the first sum as a big sum over a sigma type, in the finset
-- `comp_partial_sum_target 0 N N`
rw [finset.range_eq_Ico, finset.sum_sigma'],
-- use `comp_change_of_variables_sum`, saying that this change of variables respects sums
apply comp_change_of_variables_sum 0 N N,
rintros ⟨k, blocks_fun⟩ H,
apply congr _ (comp_change_of_variables_length 0 N N H).symm,
intros,
rw ← comp_change_of_variables_blocks_fun 0 N N H,
refl
end
end formal_multilinear_series
open formal_multilinear_series
/-- If two functions `g` and `f` have power series `q` and `p` respectively at `f x` and `x`, then
`g ∘ f` admits the power series `q.comp p` at `x`. -/
theorem has_fpower_series_at.comp {g : F → G} {f : E → F}
{q : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 F G} {p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F} {x : E}
(hg : has_fpower_series_at g q (f x)) (hf : has_fpower_series_at f p x) :
has_fpower_series_at (g ∘ f) (q.comp p) x :=
begin
/- Consider `rf` and `rg` such that `f` and `g` have power series expansion on the disks
of radius `rf` and `rg`. -/
rcases hg with ⟨rg, Hg⟩,
rcases hf with ⟨rf, Hf⟩,
/- The terms defining `q.comp p` are geometrically summable in a disk of some radius `r`. -/
rcases q.comp_summable_nnreal p Hg.radius_pos Hf.radius_pos with ⟨r, r_pos : 0 < r, hr⟩,
/- We will consider `y` which is smaller than `r` and `rf`, and also small enough that
`f (x + y)` is close enough to `f x` to be in the disk where `g` is well behaved. Let
`min (r, rf, δ)` be this new radius.-/
have : continuous_at f x := Hf.analytic_at.continuous_at,
obtain ⟨δ, δpos, hδ⟩ : ∃ (δ : ℝ≥0∞) (H : 0 < δ),
∀ {z : E}, z ∈ emetric.ball x δ → f z ∈ emetric.ball (f x) rg,
{ have : emetric.ball (f x) rg ∈ 𝓝 (f x) := emetric.ball_mem_nhds _ Hg.r_pos,
rcases emetric.mem_nhds_iff.1 (Hf.analytic_at.continuous_at this) with ⟨δ, δpos, Hδ⟩,
exact ⟨δ, δpos, λ z hz, Hδ hz⟩ },
let rf' := min rf δ,
have min_pos : 0 < min rf' r,
by simp only [r_pos, Hf.r_pos, δpos, lt_min_iff, ennreal.coe_pos, and_self],
/- We will show that `g ∘ f` admits the power series `q.comp p` in the disk of
radius `min (r, rf', δ)`. -/
refine ⟨min rf' r, _⟩,
refine ⟨le_trans (min_le_right rf' r)
(formal_multilinear_series.le_comp_radius_of_summable q p r hr), min_pos, λ y hy, _⟩,
/- Let `y` satisfy `‖y‖ < min (r, rf', δ)`. We want to show that `g (f (x + y))` is the sum of
`q.comp p` applied to `y`. -/
-- First, check that `y` is small enough so that estimates for `f` and `g` apply.
have y_mem : y ∈ emetric.ball (0 : E) rf :=
(emetric.ball_subset_ball (le_trans (min_le_left _ _) (min_le_left _ _))) hy,
have fy_mem : f (x + y) ∈ emetric.ball (f x) rg,
{ apply hδ,
have : y ∈ emetric.ball (0 : E) δ :=
(emetric.ball_subset_ball (le_trans (min_le_left _ _) (min_le_right _ _))) hy,
simpa [edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_sub, edist_eq_coe_nnnorm] },
/- Now the proof starts. To show that the sum of `q.comp p` at `y` is `g (f (x + y))`, we will
write `q.comp p` applied to `y` as a big sum over all compositions. Since the sum is
summable, to get its convergence it suffices to get the convergence along some increasing sequence
of sets. We will use the sequence of sets `comp_partial_sum_target 0 n n`, along which the sum is
exactly the composition of the partial sums of `q` and `p`, by design. To show that it converges
to `g (f (x + y))`, pointwise convergence would not be enough, but we have uniform convergence
to save the day. -/
-- First step: the partial sum of `p` converges to `f (x + y)`.
have A : tendsto (λ n, ∑ a in finset.Ico 1 n, p a (λ b, y)) at_top (𝓝 (f (x + y) - f x)),
{ have L : ∀ᶠ n in at_top, ∑ a in finset.range n, p a (λ b, y) - f x =
∑ a in finset.Ico 1 n, p a (λ b, y),
{ rw eventually_at_top,
refine ⟨1, λ n hn, _⟩,
symmetry,
rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq', finset.range_eq_Ico, ← Hf.coeff_zero (λi, y),
finset.sum_eq_sum_Ico_succ_bot hn] },
have : tendsto (λ n, ∑ a in finset.range n, p a (λ b, y) - f x) at_top (𝓝 (f (x + y) - f x)) :=
(Hf.has_sum y_mem).tendsto_sum_nat.sub tendsto_const_nhds,
exact tendsto.congr' L this },
-- Second step: the composition of the partial sums of `q` and `p` converges to `g (f (x + y))`.
have B : tendsto (λ n, q.partial_sum n (∑ a in finset.Ico 1 n, p a (λ b, y)))
at_top (𝓝 (g (f (x + y)))),
{ -- we use the fact that the partial sums of `q` converge locally uniformly to `g`, and that
-- composition passes to the limit under locally uniform convergence.
have B₁ : continuous_at (λ (z : F), g (f x + z)) (f (x + y) - f x),
{ refine continuous_at.comp _ (continuous_const.add continuous_id).continuous_at,
simp only [add_sub_cancel'_right, id.def],
exact Hg.continuous_on.continuous_at (is_open.mem_nhds (emetric.is_open_ball) fy_mem) },
have B₂ : f (x + y) - f x ∈ emetric.ball (0 : F) rg,
by simpa [edist_eq_coe_nnnorm, edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_sub] using fy_mem,
rw [← emetric.is_open_ball.nhds_within_eq B₂] at A,
convert Hg.tendsto_locally_uniformly_on.tendsto_comp B₁.continuous_within_at B₂ A,
simp only [add_sub_cancel'_right] },
-- Third step: the sum over all compositions in `comp_partial_sum_target 0 n n` converges to
-- `g (f (x + y))`. As this sum is exactly the composition of the partial sum, this is a direct
-- consequence of the second step
have C : tendsto (λ n,
∑ i in comp_partial_sum_target 0 n n, q.comp_along_composition p i.2 (λ j, y))
at_top (𝓝 (g (f (x + y)))),
by simpa [comp_partial_sum] using B,
-- Fourth step: the sum over all compositions is `g (f (x + y))`. This follows from the
-- convergence along a subsequence proved in the third step, and the fact that the sum is Cauchy
-- thanks to the summability properties.
have D : has_sum (λ i : (Σ n, composition n),
q.comp_along_composition p i.2 (λ j, y)) (g (f (x + y))),
{ have cau : cauchy_seq (λ (s : finset (Σ n, composition n)),
∑ i in s, q.comp_along_composition p i.2 (λ j, y)),
{ apply cauchy_seq_finset_of_norm_bounded _ (nnreal.summable_coe.2 hr) _,
simp only [coe_nnnorm, nnreal.coe_mul, nnreal.coe_pow],
rintros ⟨n, c⟩,
calc ‖(comp_along_composition q p c) (λ (j : fin n), y)‖
≤ ‖comp_along_composition q p c‖ * ∏ j : fin n, ‖y‖ :
by apply continuous_multilinear_map.le_op_norm
... ≤ ‖comp_along_composition q p c‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n :
begin
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ (norm_nonneg _),
rw [finset.prod_const, finset.card_fin],
apply pow_le_pow_of_le_left (norm_nonneg _),
rw [emetric.mem_ball, edist_eq_coe_nnnorm] at hy,
have := (le_trans (le_of_lt hy) (min_le_right _ _)),
rwa [ennreal.coe_le_coe, ← nnreal.coe_le_coe, coe_nnnorm] at this
end },
exact tendsto_nhds_of_cauchy_seq_of_subseq cau
comp_partial_sum_target_tendsto_at_top C },
-- Fifth step: the sum over `n` of `q.comp p n` can be expressed as a particular resummation of
-- the sum over all compositions, by grouping together the compositions of the same
-- integer `n`. The convergence of the whole sum therefore implies the converence of the sum
-- of `q.comp p n`
have E : has_sum (λ n, (q.comp p) n (λ j, y)) (g (f (x + y))),
{ apply D.sigma,
assume n,
dsimp [formal_multilinear_series.comp],
convert has_sum_fintype _,
simp only [continuous_multilinear_map.sum_apply],
refl },
exact E
end
/-- If two functions `g` and `f` are analytic respectively at `f x` and `x`, then `g ∘ f` is
analytic at `x`. -/
theorem analytic_at.comp {g : F → G} {f : E → F} {x : E}
(hg : analytic_at 𝕜 g (f x)) (hf : analytic_at 𝕜 f x) : analytic_at 𝕜 (g ∘ f) x :=
let ⟨q, hq⟩ := hg, ⟨p, hp⟩ := hf in (hq.comp hp).analytic_at
/-!
### Associativity of the composition of formal multilinear series
In this paragraph, we prove the associativity of the composition of formal power series.
By definition,
```
(r.comp q).comp p n v
= ∑_{i₁ + ... + iₖ = n} (r.comp q)ₖ (p_{i₁} (v₀, ..., v_{i₁ -1}), p_{i₂} (...), ..., p_{iₖ}(...))
= ∑_{a : composition n} (r.comp q) a.length (apply_composition p a v)
```
decomposing `r.comp q` in the same way, we get
```
(r.comp q).comp p n v
= ∑_{a : composition n} ∑_{b : composition a.length}
r b.length (apply_composition q b (apply_composition p a v))
```
On the other hand,
```
r.comp (q.comp p) n v = ∑_{c : composition n} r c.length (apply_composition (q.comp p) c v)
```
Here, `apply_composition (q.comp p) c v` is a vector of length `c.length`, whose `i`-th term is
given by `(q.comp p) (c.blocks_fun i) (v_l, v_{l+1}, ..., v_{m-1})` where `{l, ..., m-1}` is the
`i`-th block in the composition `c`, of length `c.blocks_fun i` by definition. To compute this term,
we expand it as `∑_{dᵢ : composition (c.blocks_fun i)} q dᵢ.length (apply_composition p dᵢ v')`,
where `v' = (v_l, v_{l+1}, ..., v_{m-1})`. Therefore, we get
```
r.comp (q.comp p) n v =
∑_{c : composition n} ∑_{d₀ : composition (c.blocks_fun 0),
..., d_{c.length - 1} : composition (c.blocks_fun (c.length - 1))}
r c.length (λ i, q dᵢ.length (apply_composition p dᵢ v'ᵢ))
```
To show that these terms coincide, we need to explain how to reindex the sums to put them in
bijection (and then the terms we are summing will correspond to each other). Suppose we have a
composition `a` of `n`, and a composition `b` of `a.length`. Then `b` indicates how to group
together some blocks of `a`, giving altogether `b.length` blocks of blocks. These blocks of blocks
can be called `d₀, ..., d_{a.length - 1}`, and one obtains a composition `c` of `n` by saying that
each `dᵢ` is one single block. Conversely, if one starts from `c` and the `dᵢ`s, one can concatenate
the `dᵢ`s to obtain a composition `a` of `n`, and register the lengths of the `dᵢ`s in a composition
`b` of `a.length`.
An example might be enlightening. Suppose `a = [2, 2, 3, 4, 2]`. It is a composition of
length 5 of 13. The content of the blocks may be represented as `0011222333344`.
Now take `b = [2, 3]` as a composition of `a.length = 5`. It says that the first 2 blocks of `a`
should be merged, and the last 3 blocks of `a` should be merged, giving a new composition of `13`
made of two blocks of length `4` and `9`, i.e., `c = [4, 9]`. But one can also remember that
the new first block was initially made of two blocks of size `2`, so `d₀ = [2, 2]`, and the new
second block was initially made of three blocks of size `3`, `4` and `2`, so `d₁ = [3, 4, 2]`.
This equivalence is called `composition.sigma_equiv_sigma_pi n` below.
We start with preliminary results on compositions, of a very specialized nature, then define the
equivalence `composition.sigma_equiv_sigma_pi n`, and we deduce finally the associativity of
composition of formal multilinear series in `formal_multilinear_series.comp_assoc`.
-/
namespace composition
variable {n : ℕ}
/-- Rewriting equality in the dependent type `Σ (a : composition n), composition a.length)` in
non-dependent terms with lists, requiring that the blocks coincide. -/
lemma sigma_composition_eq_iff (i j : Σ (a : composition n), composition a.length) :
i = j ↔ i.1.blocks = j.1.blocks ∧ i.2.blocks = j.2.blocks :=
begin
refine ⟨by rintro rfl; exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, _⟩,
rcases i with ⟨a, b⟩,
rcases j with ⟨a', b'⟩,
rintros ⟨h, h'⟩,
have H : a = a', by { ext1, exact h },
induction H, congr, ext1, exact h'
end
/-- Rewriting equality in the dependent type
`Σ (c : composition n), Π (i : fin c.length), composition (c.blocks_fun i)` in
non-dependent terms with lists, requiring that the lists of blocks coincide. -/
lemma sigma_pi_composition_eq_iff
(u v : Σ (c : composition n), Π (i : fin c.length), composition (c.blocks_fun i)) :
u = v ↔ of_fn (λ i, (u.2 i).blocks) = of_fn (λ i, (v.2 i).blocks) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ H, by rw H, λ H, _⟩,
rcases u with ⟨a, b⟩,
rcases v with ⟨a', b'⟩,
dsimp at H,
have h : a = a',
{ ext1,
have : map list.sum (of_fn (λ (i : fin (composition.length a)), (b i).blocks)) =
map list.sum (of_fn (λ (i : fin (composition.length a')), (b' i).blocks)), by rw H,
simp only [map_of_fn] at this,
change of_fn (λ (i : fin (composition.length a)), (b i).blocks.sum) =
of_fn (λ (i : fin (composition.length a')), (b' i).blocks.sum) at this,
simpa [composition.blocks_sum, composition.of_fn_blocks_fun] using this },
induction h,
simp only [true_and, eq_self_iff_true, heq_iff_eq],
ext i : 2,
have : nth_le (of_fn (λ (i : fin (composition.length a)), (b i).blocks)) i (by simp [i.is_lt]) =
nth_le (of_fn (λ (i : fin (composition.length a)), (b' i).blocks)) i (by simp [i.is_lt]) :=
nth_le_of_eq H _,
rwa [nth_le_of_fn, nth_le_of_fn] at this
end
/-- When `a` is a composition of `n` and `b` is a composition of `a.length`, `a.gather b` is the
composition of `n` obtained by gathering all the blocks of `a` corresponding to a block of `b`.
For instance, if `a = [6, 5, 3, 5, 2]` and `b = [2, 3]`, one should gather together
the first two blocks of `a` and its last three blocks, giving `a.gather b = [11, 10]`. -/
def gather (a : composition n) (b : composition a.length) : composition n :=
{ blocks := (a.blocks.split_wrt_composition b).map sum,
blocks_pos :=
begin
rw forall_mem_map_iff,
intros j hj,
suffices H : ∀ i ∈ j, 1 ≤ i, from
calc 0 < j.length : length_pos_of_mem_split_wrt_composition hj
... ≤ j.sum : length_le_sum_of_one_le _ H,
intros i hi,
apply a.one_le_blocks,
rw ← a.blocks.join_split_wrt_composition b,
exact mem_join_of_mem hj hi,
end,
blocks_sum := by { rw [← sum_join, join_split_wrt_composition, a.blocks_sum] } }
lemma length_gather (a : composition n) (b : composition a.length) :
length (a.gather b) = b.length :=
show (map list.sum (a.blocks.split_wrt_composition b)).length = b.blocks.length,
by rw [length_map, length_split_wrt_composition]
/-- An auxiliary function used in the definition of `sigma_equiv_sigma_pi` below, associating to
two compositions `a` of `n` and `b` of `a.length`, and an index `i` bounded by the length of
`a.gather b`, the subcomposition of `a` made of those blocks belonging to the `i`-th block of
`a.gather b`. -/
def sigma_composition_aux (a : composition n) (b : composition a.length)
(i : fin (a.gather b).length) :
composition ((a.gather b).blocks_fun i) :=
{ blocks := nth_le (a.blocks.split_wrt_composition b) i
(by { rw [length_split_wrt_composition, ← length_gather], exact i.2 }),
blocks_pos := assume i hi, a.blocks_pos
(by { rw ← a.blocks.join_split_wrt_composition b,
exact mem_join_of_mem (nth_le_mem _ _ _) hi }),
blocks_sum := by simp only [composition.blocks_fun, nth_le_map', composition.gather] }
lemma length_sigma_composition_aux (a : composition n) (b : composition a.length)
(i : fin b.length) :
composition.length (composition.sigma_composition_aux a b ⟨i, (length_gather a b).symm ▸ i.2⟩) =
composition.blocks_fun b i :=
show list.length (nth_le (split_wrt_composition a.blocks b) i _) = blocks_fun b i,
by { rw [nth_le_map_rev list.length, nth_le_of_eq (map_length_split_wrt_composition _ _)], refl }
lemma blocks_fun_sigma_composition_aux (a : composition n) (b : composition a.length)
(i : fin b.length) (j : fin (blocks_fun b i)) :
blocks_fun (sigma_composition_aux a b ⟨i, (length_gather a b).symm ▸ i.2⟩)
⟨j, (length_sigma_composition_aux a b i).symm ▸ j.2⟩ = blocks_fun a (embedding b i j) :=
show nth_le (nth_le _ _ _) _ _ = nth_le a.blocks _ _,
by { rw [nth_le_of_eq (nth_le_split_wrt_composition _ _ _), nth_le_drop', nth_le_take'], refl }
/-- Auxiliary lemma to prove that the composition of formal multilinear series is associative.
Consider a composition `a` of `n` and a composition `b` of `a.length`. Grouping together some
blocks of `a` according to `b` as in `a.gather b`, one can compute the total size of the blocks
of `a` up to an index `size_up_to b i + j` (where the `j` corresponds to a set of blocks of `a`
that do not fill a whole block of `a.gather b`). The first part corresponds to a sum of blocks
in `a.gather b`, and the second one to a sum of blocks in the next block of
`sigma_composition_aux a b`. This is the content of this lemma. -/
lemma size_up_to_size_up_to_add (a : composition n) (b : composition a.length)
{i j : ℕ} (hi : i < b.length) (hj : j < blocks_fun b ⟨i, hi⟩) :
size_up_to a (size_up_to b i + j) = size_up_to (a.gather b) i +
(size_up_to (sigma_composition_aux a b ⟨i, (length_gather a b).symm ▸ hi⟩) j) :=
begin
induction j with j IHj,
{ show sum (take ((b.blocks.take i).sum) a.blocks) =
sum (take i (map sum (split_wrt_composition a.blocks b))),
induction i with i IH,
{ refl },
{ have A : i < b.length := nat.lt_of_succ_lt hi,
have B : i < list.length (map list.sum (split_wrt_composition a.blocks b)), by simp [A],
have C : 0 < blocks_fun b ⟨i, A⟩ := composition.blocks_pos' _ _ _,
rw [sum_take_succ _ _ B, ← IH A C],
have : take (sum (take i b.blocks)) a.blocks =
take (sum (take i b.blocks)) (take (sum (take (i+1) b.blocks)) a.blocks),
{ rw [take_take, min_eq_left],
apply monotone_sum_take _ (nat.le_succ _) },
rw [this, nth_le_map', nth_le_split_wrt_composition,
← take_append_drop (sum (take i b.blocks))
((take (sum (take (nat.succ i) b.blocks)) a.blocks)), sum_append],
congr,
rw [take_append_drop] } },
{ have A : j < blocks_fun b ⟨i, hi⟩ := lt_trans (lt_add_one j) hj,
have B : j < length (sigma_composition_aux a b ⟨i, (length_gather a b).symm ▸ hi⟩),
by { convert A, rw [← length_sigma_composition_aux], refl },
have C : size_up_to b i + j < size_up_to b (i + 1),
{ simp only [size_up_to_succ b hi, add_lt_add_iff_left],
exact A },
have D : size_up_to b i + j < length a := lt_of_lt_of_le C (b.size_up_to_le _),
have : size_up_to b i + nat.succ j = (size_up_to b i + j).succ := rfl,
rw [this, size_up_to_succ _ D, IHj A, size_up_to_succ _ B],
simp only [sigma_composition_aux, add_assoc, add_left_inj, fin.coe_mk],
rw [nth_le_of_eq (nth_le_split_wrt_composition _ _ _), nth_le_drop', nth_le_take _ _ C] }
end
/--
Natural equivalence between `(Σ (a : composition n), composition a.length)` and
`(Σ (c : composition n), Π (i : fin c.length), composition (c.blocks_fun i))`, that shows up as a
change of variables in the proof that composition of formal multilinear series is associative.
Consider a composition `a` of `n` and a composition `b` of `a.length`. Then `b` indicates how to
group together some blocks of `a`, giving altogether `b.length` blocks of blocks. These blocks of
blocks can be called `d₀, ..., d_{a.length - 1}`, and one obtains a composition `c` of `n` by
saying that each `dᵢ` is one single block. The map `⟨a, b⟩ → ⟨c, (d₀, ..., d_{a.length - 1})⟩` is
the direct map in the equiv.
Conversely, if one starts from `c` and the `dᵢ`s, one can join the `dᵢ`s to obtain a composition
`a` of `n`, and register the lengths of the `dᵢ`s in a composition `b` of `a.length`. This is the
inverse map of the equiv.
-/
def sigma_equiv_sigma_pi (n : ℕ) :
(Σ (a : composition n), composition a.length) ≃
(Σ (c : composition n), Π (i : fin c.length), composition (c.blocks_fun i)) :=
{ to_fun := λ i, ⟨i.1.gather i.2, i.1.sigma_composition_aux i.2⟩,
inv_fun := λ i, ⟨
{ blocks := (of_fn (λ j, (i.2 j).blocks)).join,
blocks_pos :=
begin
simp only [and_imp, list.mem_join, exists_imp_distrib, forall_mem_of_fn_iff],
exact λ i j hj, composition.blocks_pos _ hj
end,
blocks_sum := by simp [sum_of_fn, composition.blocks_sum, composition.sum_blocks_fun] },
{ blocks := of_fn (λ j, (i.2 j).length),
blocks_pos := forall_mem_of_fn_iff.2
(λ j, composition.length_pos_of_pos _ (composition.blocks_pos' _ _ _)),
blocks_sum := by { dsimp only [composition.length], simp [sum_of_fn] } }⟩,
left_inv :=
begin
-- the fact that we have a left inverse is essentially `join_split_wrt_composition`,
-- but we need to massage it to take care of the dependent setting.
rintros ⟨a, b⟩,
rw sigma_composition_eq_iff,
dsimp,
split,
{ have A := length_map list.sum (split_wrt_composition a.blocks b),
conv_rhs { rw [← join_split_wrt_composition a.blocks b,
← of_fn_nth_le (split_wrt_composition a.blocks b)] },
congr,
{ exact A },
{ exact (fin.heq_fun_iff A).2 (λ i, rfl) } },
{ have B : composition.length (composition.gather a b) = list.length b.blocks :=
composition.length_gather _ _,
conv_rhs { rw [← of_fn_nth_le b.blocks] },
congr' 1,
apply (fin.heq_fun_iff B).2 (λ i, _),
rw [sigma_composition_aux, composition.length, nth_le_map_rev list.length,
nth_le_of_eq (map_length_split_wrt_composition _ _)], refl }
end,
right_inv :=
begin
-- the fact that we have a right inverse is essentially `split_wrt_composition_join`,
-- but we need to massage it to take care of the dependent setting.
rintros ⟨c, d⟩,
have : map list.sum (of_fn (λ (i : fin (composition.length c)), (d i).blocks)) = c.blocks,
by simp [map_of_fn, (∘), composition.blocks_sum, composition.of_fn_blocks_fun],
rw sigma_pi_composition_eq_iff,
dsimp,
congr,
{ ext1,
dsimp [composition.gather],
rwa split_wrt_composition_join,
simp only [map_of_fn] },
{ rw fin.heq_fun_iff,
{ assume i,
dsimp [composition.sigma_composition_aux],
rw [nth_le_of_eq (split_wrt_composition_join _ _ _)],
{ simp only [nth_le_of_fn'] },
{ simp only [map_of_fn] } },
{ congr,
ext1,
dsimp [composition.gather],
rwa split_wrt_composition_join,
simp only [map_of_fn] } }
end }
end composition
namespace formal_multilinear_series
open composition
theorem comp_assoc (r : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 G H) (q : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 F G)
(p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) :
(r.comp q).comp p = r.comp (q.comp p) :=
begin
ext n v,
/- First, rewrite the two compositions appearing in the theorem as two sums over complicated
sigma types, as in the description of the proof above. -/
let f : (Σ (a : composition n), composition a.length) → H :=
λ c, r c.2.length (apply_composition q c.2 (apply_composition p c.1 v)),
let g : (Σ (c : composition n), Π (i : fin c.length), composition (c.blocks_fun i)) → H :=
λ c, r c.1.length (λ (i : fin c.1.length),
q (c.2 i).length (apply_composition p (c.2 i) (v ∘ c.1.embedding i))),
suffices : ∑ c, f c = ∑ c, g c,
by simpa only [formal_multilinear_series.comp, continuous_multilinear_map.sum_apply,
comp_along_composition_apply, continuous_multilinear_map.map_sum, finset.sum_sigma',
apply_composition],
/- Now, we use `composition.sigma_equiv_sigma_pi n` to change
variables in the second sum, and check that we get exactly the same sums. -/
rw ← (sigma_equiv_sigma_pi n).sum_comp,
/- To check that we have the same terms, we should check that we apply the same component of
`r`, and the same component of `q`, and the same component of `p`, to the same coordinate of
`v`. This is true by definition, but at each step one needs to convince Lean that the types
one considers are the same, using a suitable congruence lemma to avoid dependent type issues.
This dance has to be done three times, one for `r`, one for `q` and one for `p`.-/
apply finset.sum_congr rfl,
rintros ⟨a, b⟩ _,
dsimp [f, g, sigma_equiv_sigma_pi],
-- check that the `r` components are the same. Based on `composition.length_gather`
apply r.congr (composition.length_gather a b).symm,
intros i hi1 hi2,
-- check that the `q` components are the same. Based on `length_sigma_composition_aux`
apply q.congr (length_sigma_composition_aux a b _).symm,
intros j hj1 hj2,
-- check that the `p` components are the same. Based on `blocks_fun_sigma_composition_aux`
apply p.congr (blocks_fun_sigma_composition_aux a b _ _).symm,
intros k hk1 hk2,
-- finally, check that the coordinates of `v` one is using are the same. Based on
-- `size_up_to_size_up_to_add`.
refine congr_arg v (fin.eq_of_veq _),
dsimp [composition.embedding],
rw [size_up_to_size_up_to_add _ _ hi1 hj1, add_assoc],
end
end formal_multilinear_series
|
89e1282e24f52add45eaf9e52126fa60b96bb1fe | 63abd62053d479eae5abf4951554e1064a4c45b4 | /src/algebra/category/Group/Z_Module_equivalence.lean | 57669afe8ed51db8d0b454c0661f98637fe2abeb | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Lix0120/mathlib | 0020745240315ed0e517cbf32e738d8f9811dd80 | e14c37827456fc6707f31b4d1d16f1f3a3205e91 | refs/heads/master | 1,673,102,855,024 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 308,930,245 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,604,164,710,000 | 1,604,163,547,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,329 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import algebra.category.Module.basic
/-!
The forgetful functor from ℤ-modules to additive commutative groups is
an equivalence of categories.
TODO:
either use this equivalence to transport the monoidal structure from `Module ℤ` to `Ab`,
or, having constructed that monoidal structure directly, show this functor is monoidal.
-/
open category_theory
open category_theory.equivalence
universes u
/-- The forgetful functor from `ℤ` modules to `AddCommGroup` is full. -/
instance : full (forget₂ (Module ℤ) AddCommGroup.{u}) :=
{ preimage := λ A B f,
-- TODO: why `add_monoid_hom.to_int_linear_map` doesn't work here?
{ to_fun := f,
map_add' := add_monoid_hom.map_add f,
map_smul' := λ n x, by convert add_monoid_hom.map_int_module_smul f n x } }
/-- The forgetful functor from `ℤ` modules to `AddCommGroup` is essentially surjective. -/
instance : ess_surj (forget₂ (Module ℤ) AddCommGroup.{u}) :=
{ obj_preimage := λ A, Module.of ℤ A,
iso' := λ A, { hom := 𝟙 A, inv := 𝟙 A, } }
instance : is_equivalence (forget₂ (Module ℤ) AddCommGroup.{u}) :=
equivalence_of_fully_faithfully_ess_surj (forget₂ (Module ℤ) AddCommGroup)
|
2778a6a0fa15bdf33009d137854eecc1a345a2e9 | 1446f520c1db37e157b631385707cc28a17a595e | /tests/bench/rbmap_checkpoint.lean | f505c9eede9673f1f1706194472a5078a976f463 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | bdbabiak/lean4 | cab06b8a2606d99a168dd279efdd404edb4e825a | 3f4d0d78b2ce3ef541cb643bbe21496bd6b057ac | refs/heads/master | 1,615,045,275,530 | 1,583,793,696,000 | 1,583,793,696,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,391 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Option.Basic
import Init.Data.List.BasicAux
import Init.System.IO
universes u v w w'
inductive color
| Red | Black
inductive Tree
| Leaf {} : Tree
| Node (color : color) (lchild : Tree) (key : Nat) (val : Bool) (rchild : Tree) : Tree
instance : Inhabited Tree := ⟨Tree.Leaf⟩
variables {σ : Type w}
open color Nat Tree
def fold (f : Nat → Bool → σ → σ) : Tree → σ → σ
| Leaf, b => b
| Node _ l k v r, b => fold r (f k v (fold l b))
@[inline]
def balance1 : Nat → Bool → Tree → Tree → Tree
| kv, vv, t, Node _ (Node Red l kx vx r₁) ky vy r₂ => Node Red (Node Black l kx vx r₁) ky vy (Node Black r₂ kv vv t)
| kv, vv, t, Node _ l₁ ky vy (Node Red l₂ kx vx r) => Node Red (Node Black l₁ ky vy l₂) kx vx (Node Black r kv vv t)
| kv, vv, t, Node _ l ky vy r => Node Black (Node Red l ky vy r) kv vv t
| _, _, _, _ => Leaf
@[inline]
def balance2 : Tree → Nat → Bool → Tree → Tree
| t, kv, vv, Node _ (Node Red l kx₁ vx₁ r₁) ky vy r₂ => Node Red (Node Black t kv vv l) kx₁ vx₁ (Node Black r₁ ky vy r₂)
| t, kv, vv, Node _ l₁ ky vy (Node Red l₂ kx₂ vx₂ r₂) => Node Red (Node Black t kv vv l₁) ky vy (Node Black l₂ kx₂ vx₂ r₂)
| t, kv, vv, Node _ l ky vy r => Node Black t kv vv (Node Red l ky vy r)
| _, _, _, _ => Leaf
def isRed : Tree → Bool
| Node Red _ _ _ _ => true
| _ => false
def ins : Tree → Nat → Bool → Tree
| Leaf, kx, vx => Node Red Leaf kx vx Leaf
| Node Red a ky vy b, kx, vx =>
(if kx < ky then Node Red (ins a kx vx) ky vy b
else if kx = ky then Node Red a kx vx b
else Node Red a ky vy (ins b kx vx))
| Node Black a ky vy b, kx, vx =>
if kx < ky then
(if isRed a then balance1 ky vy b (ins a kx vx)
else Node Black (ins a kx vx) ky vy b)
else if kx = ky then Node Black a kx vx b
else if isRed b then balance2 a ky vy (ins b kx vx)
else Node Black a ky vy (ins b kx vx)
def setBlack : Tree → Tree
| Node _ l k v r => Node Black l k v r
| e => e
def insert (t : Tree) (k : Nat) (v : Bool) : Tree :=
if isRed t then setBlack (ins t k v)
else ins t k v
def mkMapAux (freq : Nat) : Nat → Tree → List Tree → List Tree
| 0, m, r => m::r
| n+1, m, r =>
let m := insert m n (n % 10 = 0);
let r := if n % freq == 0 then m::r else r;
mkMapAux n m r
def mkMap (n : Nat) (freq : Nat) : List Tree :=
mkMapAux freq n Leaf []
def myLen : List Tree → Nat → Nat
| Node _ _ _ _ _ :: xs, r => myLen xs (r + 1)
| _ :: xs, r => myLen xs r
| [], r => r
def main (xs : List String) : IO UInt32 := do
[n, freq] ← pure xs | throw $ IO.userError "invalid input";
let n := n.toNat;
let freq := freq.toNat;
let freq := if freq == 0 then 1 else freq;
let mList := mkMap n freq;
let v := fold (fun (k : Nat) (v : Bool) (r : Nat) => if v then r + 1 else r) mList.head! 0;
IO.println (toString (myLen mList 0) ++ " " ++ toString v) *>
pure 0
|
f18a2a62c8d5e310d66e44bb8df9b45df29c9880 | 94637389e03c919023691dcd05bd4411b1034aa5 | /src/inClassNotes/higherOrderFunctions/box_map.lean | 58d4146d45c6ed1608b884b703526357c2e36abf | [] | no_license | kevinsullivan/complogic-s21 | 7c4eef2105abad899e46502270d9829d913e8afc | 99039501b770248c8ceb39890be5dfe129dc1082 | refs/heads/master | 1,682,985,669,944 | 1,621,126,241,000 | 1,621,126,241,000 | 335,706,272 | 0 | 38 | null | 1,618,325,669,000 | 1,612,374,118,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 205 | lean | universes u₁ u₂
structure box (α : Type u₁) : Type u₁ :=
mk :: (val : α)
def map_box
{α : Type u₁}
{β : Type u₂}
(f : α → β)
(b : box α) :
box β :=
box.mk (f b.val)
|
beb313e683a64c3f94cde5834f832e8e27099b34 | 626e312b5c1cb2d88fca108f5933076012633192 | /src/data/part.lean | b33a99263f27f7a10d0dc0de1a603300e5851efb | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Bioye97/mathlib | 9db2f9ee54418d29dd06996279ba9dc874fd6beb | 782a20a27ee83b523f801ff34efb1a9557085019 | refs/heads/master | 1,690,305,956,488 | 1,631,067,774,000 | 1,631,067,774,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,217 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Jeremy Avigad, Simon Hudon
-/
import data.equiv.basic
/-!
# Partial values of a type
-/
/-- `part α` is the type of "partial values" of type `α`. It
is similar to `option α` except the domain condition can be an
arbitrary proposition, not necessarily decidable. -/
structure {u} part (α : Type u) : Type u :=
(dom : Prop)
(get : dom → α)
namespace part
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
/-- Convert a `part α` with a decidable domain to an option -/
def to_option (o : part α) [decidable o.dom] : option α :=
if h : dom o then some (o.get h) else none
/-- `part` extensionality -/
theorem ext' : ∀ {o p : part α}
(H1 : o.dom ↔ p.dom)
(H2 : ∀h₁ h₂, o.get h₁ = p.get h₂), o = p
| ⟨od, o⟩ ⟨pd, p⟩ H1 H2 := have t : od = pd, from propext H1,
by cases t; rw [show o = p, from funext $ λp, H2 p p]
/-- `part` eta expansion -/
@[simp] theorem eta : Π (o : part α), (⟨o.dom, λ h, o.get h⟩ : part α) = o
| ⟨h, f⟩ := rfl
/-- `a ∈ o` means that `o` is defined and equal to `a` -/
protected def mem (a : α) (o : part α) : Prop := ∃ h, o.get h = a
instance : has_mem α (part α) := ⟨part.mem⟩
theorem mem_eq (a : α) (o : part α) : (a ∈ o) = (∃ h, o.get h = a) :=
rfl
theorem dom_iff_mem : ∀ {o : part α}, o.dom ↔ ∃y, y ∈ o
| ⟨p, f⟩ := ⟨λh, ⟨f h, h, rfl⟩, λ⟨_, h, rfl⟩, h⟩
theorem get_mem {o : part α} (h) : get o h ∈ o := ⟨_, rfl⟩
/-- `part` extensionality -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {o p : part α} (H : ∀ a, a ∈ o ↔ a ∈ p) : o = p :=
ext' ⟨λ h, ((H _).1 ⟨h, rfl⟩).fst,
λ h, ((H _).2 ⟨h, rfl⟩).fst⟩ $
λ a b, ((H _).2 ⟨_, rfl⟩).snd
/-- The `none` value in `part` has a `false` domain and an empty function. -/
def none : part α := ⟨false, false.rec _⟩
instance : inhabited (part α) := ⟨none⟩
@[simp] theorem not_mem_none (a : α) : a ∉ @none α := λ h, h.fst
/-- The `some a` value in `part` has a `true` domain and the
function returns `a`. -/
def some (a : α) : part α := ⟨true, λ_, a⟩
theorem mem_unique : ∀ {a b : α} {o : part α}, a ∈ o → b ∈ o → a = b
| _ _ ⟨p, f⟩ ⟨h₁, rfl⟩ ⟨h₂, rfl⟩ := rfl
theorem mem.left_unique : relator.left_unique ((∈) : α → part α → Prop) :=
⟨λ a o b, mem_unique⟩
theorem get_eq_of_mem {o : part α} {a} (h : a ∈ o) (h') : get o h' = a :=
mem_unique ⟨_, rfl⟩ h
protected theorem subsingleton (o : part α) : set.subsingleton {a | a ∈ o} :=
λ a ha b hb, mem_unique ha hb
@[simp] theorem get_some {a : α} (ha : (some a).dom) : get (some a) ha = a := rfl
theorem mem_some (a : α) : a ∈ some a := ⟨trivial, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_some_iff {a b} : b ∈ (some a : part α) ↔ b = a :=
⟨λ⟨h, e⟩, e.symm, λ e, ⟨trivial, e.symm⟩⟩
theorem eq_some_iff {a : α} {o : part α} : o = some a ↔ a ∈ o :=
⟨λ e, e.symm ▸ mem_some _,
λ ⟨h, e⟩, e ▸ ext' (iff_true_intro h) (λ _ _, rfl)⟩
theorem eq_none_iff {o : part α} : o = none ↔ ∀ a, a ∉ o :=
⟨λ e, e.symm ▸ not_mem_none,
λ h, ext (by simpa [not_mem_none])⟩
theorem eq_none_iff' {o : part α} : o = none ↔ ¬ o.dom :=
⟨λ e, e.symm ▸ id, λ h, eq_none_iff.2 (λ a h', h h'.fst)⟩
lemma some_ne_none (x : α) : some x ≠ none :=
by { intro h, change none.dom, rw [← h], trivial }
lemma ne_none_iff {o : part α} : o ≠ none ↔ ∃x, o = some x :=
begin
split,
{ rw [ne, eq_none_iff], intro h, push_neg at h, cases h with x hx, use x, rwa [eq_some_iff] },
{ rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩, apply some_ne_none }
end
lemma eq_none_or_eq_some (o : part α) : o = none ∨ ∃ x, o = some x :=
begin
classical,
by_cases h : o.dom,
{ rw dom_iff_mem at h, right,
apply exists_imp_exists _ h,
simp [eq_some_iff] },
{ rw eq_none_iff', exact or.inl h },
end
@[simp] lemma some_inj {a b : α} : part.some a = some b ↔ a = b :=
function.injective.eq_iff (λ a b h, congr_fun (eq_of_heq (part.mk.inj h).2) trivial)
@[simp] lemma some_get {a : part α} (ha : a.dom) :
part.some (part.get a ha) = a :=
eq.symm (eq_some_iff.2 ⟨ha, rfl⟩)
lemma get_eq_iff_eq_some {a : part α} {ha : a.dom} {b : α} :
a.get ha = b ↔ a = some b :=
⟨λ h, by simp [h.symm], λ h, by simp [h]⟩
lemma get_eq_get_of_eq (a : part α) (ha : a.dom) {b : part α} (h : a = b) :
a.get ha = b.get (h ▸ ha) :=
by { congr, exact h }
instance none_decidable : decidable (@none α).dom := decidable.false
instance some_decidable (a : α) : decidable (some a).dom := decidable.true
/-- Retrieves the value of `a : part α` if it exists, and return the provided default value
otherwise. -/
def get_or_else (a : part α) [decidable a.dom] (d : α) :=
if ha : a.dom then a.get ha else d
@[simp] lemma get_or_else_none (d : α) : get_or_else none d = d :=
dif_neg id
@[simp] lemma get_or_else_some (a : α) (d : α) : get_or_else (some a) d = a :=
dif_pos trivial
@[simp] theorem mem_to_option {o : part α} [decidable o.dom] {a : α} :
a ∈ to_option o ↔ a ∈ o :=
begin
unfold to_option,
by_cases h : o.dom; simp [h],
{ exact ⟨λ h, ⟨_, h⟩, λ ⟨_, h⟩, h⟩ },
{ exact mt Exists.fst h }
end
/-- Converts an `option α` into a `part α`. -/
def of_option : option α → part α
| option.none := none
| (option.some a) := some a
@[simp] theorem mem_of_option {a : α} : ∀ {o : option α}, a ∈ of_option o ↔ a ∈ o
| option.none := ⟨λ h, h.fst.elim, λ h, option.no_confusion h⟩
| (option.some b) := ⟨λ h, congr_arg option.some h.snd,
λ h, ⟨trivial, option.some.inj h⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem of_option_dom {α} : ∀ (o : option α), (of_option o).dom ↔ o.is_some
| option.none := by simp [of_option, none]
| (option.some a) := by simp [of_option]
theorem of_option_eq_get {α} (o : option α) : of_option o = ⟨_, @option.get _ o⟩ :=
part.ext' (of_option_dom o) $ λ h₁ h₂, by cases o; [cases h₁, refl]
instance : has_coe (option α) (part α) := ⟨of_option⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_coe {a : α} {o : option α} :
a ∈ (o : part α) ↔ a ∈ o := mem_of_option
@[simp] theorem coe_none : (@option.none α : part α) = none := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_some (a : α) : (option.some a : part α) = some a := rfl
@[elab_as_eliminator] protected lemma induction_on {P : part α → Prop}
(a : part α) (hnone : P none) (hsome : ∀ a : α, P (some a)) : P a :=
(classical.em a.dom).elim
(λ h, part.some_get h ▸ hsome _)
(λ h, (eq_none_iff'.2 h).symm ▸ hnone)
instance of_option_decidable : ∀ o : option α, decidable (of_option o).dom
| option.none := part.none_decidable
| (option.some a) := part.some_decidable a
@[simp] theorem to_of_option (o : option α) : to_option (of_option o) = o :=
by cases o; refl
@[simp] theorem of_to_option (o : part α) [decidable o.dom] : of_option (to_option o) = o :=
ext $ λ a, mem_of_option.trans mem_to_option
/-- `part α` is (classically) equivalent to `option α`. -/
noncomputable def equiv_option : part α ≃ option α :=
by haveI := classical.dec; exact
⟨λ o, to_option o, of_option, λ o, of_to_option o,
λ o, eq.trans (by dsimp; congr) (to_of_option o)⟩
/-- We give `part α` the order where everything is greater than `none`. -/
instance : order_bot (part α) :=
{ le := λ x y, ∀ i, i ∈ x → i ∈ y,
le_refl := λ x y, id,
le_trans := λ x y z f g i, g _ ∘ f _,
le_antisymm := λ x y f g, part.ext $ λ z, ⟨f _, g _⟩,
bot := none,
bot_le := by { introv x, rintro ⟨⟨_⟩,_⟩, } }
instance : preorder (part α) :=
by apply_instance
lemma le_total_of_le_of_le {x y : part α} (z : part α) (hx : x ≤ z) (hy : y ≤ z) :
x ≤ y ∨ y ≤ x :=
begin
rcases part.eq_none_or_eq_some x with h | ⟨b, h₀⟩,
{ rw h, left, apply order_bot.bot_le _ },
right, intros b' h₁,
rw part.eq_some_iff at h₀,
replace hx := hx _ h₀, replace hy := hy _ h₁,
replace hx := part.mem_unique hx hy, subst hx,
exact h₀
end
/-- `assert p f` is a bind-like operation which appends an additional condition
`p` to the domain and uses `f` to produce the value. -/
def assert (p : Prop) (f : p → part α) : part α :=
⟨∃h : p, (f h).dom, λha, (f ha.fst).get ha.snd⟩
/-- The bind operation has value `g (f.get)`, and is defined when all the
parts are defined. -/
protected def bind (f : part α) (g : α → part β) : part β :=
assert (dom f) (λb, g (f.get b))
/-- The map operation for `part` just maps the value and maintains the same domain. -/
def map (f : α → β) (o : part α) : part β :=
⟨o.dom, f ∘ o.get⟩
theorem mem_map (f : α → β) {o : part α} :
∀ {a}, a ∈ o → f a ∈ map f o
| _ ⟨h, rfl⟩ := ⟨_, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_map_iff (f : α → β) {o : part α} {b} :
b ∈ map f o ↔ ∃ a ∈ o, f a = b :=
⟨match b with _, ⟨h, rfl⟩ := ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩, rfl⟩ end,
λ ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩, h₂ ▸ mem_map f h₁⟩
@[simp] theorem map_none (f : α → β) :
map f none = none := eq_none_iff.2 $ λ a, by simp
@[simp] theorem map_some (f : α → β) (a : α) : map f (some a) = some (f a) :=
eq_some_iff.2 $ mem_map f $ mem_some _
theorem mem_assert {p : Prop} {f : p → part α}
: ∀ {a} (h : p), a ∈ f h → a ∈ assert p f
| _ x ⟨h, rfl⟩ := ⟨⟨x, h⟩, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_assert_iff {p : Prop} {f : p → part α} {a} :
a ∈ assert p f ↔ ∃ h : p, a ∈ f h :=
⟨match a with _, ⟨h, rfl⟩ := ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩ end,
λ ⟨a, h⟩, mem_assert _ h⟩
lemma assert_pos {p : Prop} {f : p → part α} (h : p) :
assert p f = f h :=
begin
dsimp [assert],
cases h' : f h,
simp only [h', h, true_and, iff_self, exists_prop_of_true, eq_iff_iff],
apply function.hfunext,
{ simp only [h,h',exists_prop_of_true] },
{ cc }
end
lemma assert_neg {p : Prop} {f : p → part α} (h : ¬ p) :
assert p f = none :=
begin
dsimp [assert,none], congr,
{ simp only [h, not_false_iff, exists_prop_of_false] },
{ apply function.hfunext,
{ simp only [h, not_false_iff, exists_prop_of_false] },
cc },
end
theorem mem_bind {f : part α} {g : α → part β} :
∀ {a b}, a ∈ f → b ∈ g a → b ∈ f.bind g
| _ _ ⟨h, rfl⟩ ⟨h₂, rfl⟩ := ⟨⟨h, h₂⟩, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_bind_iff {f : part α} {g : α → part β} {b} :
b ∈ f.bind g ↔ ∃ a ∈ f, b ∈ g a :=
⟨match b with _, ⟨⟨h₁, h₂⟩, rfl⟩ := ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩ end,
λ ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩, mem_bind h₁ h₂⟩
@[simp] theorem bind_none (f : α → part β) :
none.bind f = none := eq_none_iff.2 $ λ a, by simp
@[simp] theorem bind_some (a : α) (f : α → part β) :
(some a).bind f = f a := ext $ by simp
theorem bind_some_eq_map (f : α → β) (x : part α) :
x.bind (some ∘ f) = map f x :=
ext $ by simp [eq_comm]
theorem bind_assoc {γ} (f : part α) (g : α → part β) (k : β → part γ) :
(f.bind g).bind k = f.bind (λ x, (g x).bind k) :=
ext $ λ a, by simp; exact
⟨λ ⟨_, ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩, h₃⟩, ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, h₃⟩,
λ ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, h₃⟩, ⟨_, ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩, h₃⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem bind_map {γ} (f : α → β) (x) (g : β → part γ) :
(map f x).bind g = x.bind (λ y, g (f y)) :=
by rw [← bind_some_eq_map, bind_assoc]; simp
@[simp] theorem map_bind {γ} (f : α → part β) (x : part α) (g : β → γ) :
map g (x.bind f) = x.bind (λ y, map g (f y)) :=
by rw [← bind_some_eq_map, bind_assoc]; simp [bind_some_eq_map]
theorem map_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (o : part α) :
map g (map f o) = map (g ∘ f) o :=
by rw [← bind_some_eq_map, bind_map, bind_some_eq_map]
instance : monad part :=
{ pure := @some,
map := @map,
bind := @part.bind }
instance : is_lawful_monad part :=
{ bind_pure_comp_eq_map := @bind_some_eq_map,
id_map := λ β f, by cases f; refl,
pure_bind := @bind_some,
bind_assoc := @bind_assoc }
theorem map_id' {f : α → α} (H : ∀ (x : α), f x = x) (o) : map f o = o :=
by rw [show f = id, from funext H]; exact id_map o
@[simp] theorem bind_some_right (x : part α) : x.bind some = x :=
by rw [bind_some_eq_map]; simp [map_id']
@[simp] theorem pure_eq_some (a : α) : pure a = some a := rfl
@[simp] theorem ret_eq_some (a : α) : return a = some a := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (o : part α) :
f <$> o = map f o := rfl
@[simp] theorem bind_eq_bind {α β} (f : part α) (g : α → part β) :
f >>= g = f.bind g := rfl
lemma bind_le {α} (x : part α) (f : α → part β) (y : part β) :
x >>= f ≤ y ↔ (∀ a, a ∈ x → f a ≤ y) :=
begin
split; intro h,
{ intros a h' b, replace h := h b,
simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, bind_eq_bind, mem_bind_iff, exists_imp_distrib] at h,
apply h _ h' },
{ intros b h',
simp only [exists_prop, bind_eq_bind, mem_bind_iff] at h',
rcases h' with ⟨a,h₀,h₁⟩, apply h _ h₀ _ h₁ },
end
instance : monad_fail part :=
{ fail := λ_ _, none, ..part.monad }
/-- `restrict p o h` replaces the domain of `o` with `p`, and is well defined when
`p` implies `o` is defined. -/
def restrict (p : Prop) : ∀ (o : part α), (p → o.dom) → part α
| ⟨d, f⟩ H := ⟨p, λh, f (H h)⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_restrict (p : Prop) (o : part α) (h : p → o.dom) (a : α) :
a ∈ restrict p o h ↔ p ∧ a ∈ o :=
begin
cases o, dsimp [restrict, mem_eq], split,
{ rintro ⟨h₀, h₁⟩, exact ⟨h₀, ⟨_, h₁⟩⟩ },
rintro ⟨h₀, h₁, h₂⟩, exact ⟨h₀, h₂⟩
end
/-- `unwrap o` gets the value at `o`, ignoring the condition. This function is unsound. -/
meta def unwrap (o : part α) : α := o.get undefined
theorem assert_defined {p : Prop} {f : p → part α} :
∀ (h : p), (f h).dom → (assert p f).dom := exists.intro
theorem bind_defined {f : part α} {g : α → part β} :
∀ (h : f.dom), (g (f.get h)).dom → (f.bind g).dom := assert_defined
@[simp] theorem bind_dom {f : part α} {g : α → part β} :
(f.bind g).dom ↔ ∃ h : f.dom, (g (f.get h)).dom := iff.rfl
end part
|
80cac01349d6be216087899d0f3fe584ad6805b4 | 5e42295de7f5bcdf224b94603a8ec29b17c2d367 | /rat_additions.lean | dc01f241e8032b1003866297851610bcc8092c02 | [] | no_license | pnmadelaine/lean_polya | 9369e0d87dce773f91383bb58ac6fde0a00a1a40 | 1c62b0b3fa71044b0225ce28030627d251b08ebc | refs/heads/master | 1,590,161,172,243 | 1,515,010,019,000 | 1,515,010,019,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,956 | lean | import data.rat data.nat.gcd tactic.finish algebra.group_power
--meta instance : has_to_format ℤ := ⟨λ z, int.rec_on z (λ k, ↑k) (λ k, "-"++↑(k+1)++"")⟩
meta instance int.reflect : has_reflect int
| (int.of_nat n) :=
if n = 0 then unchecked_cast `(0 : int)
else if n = 1 then unchecked_cast `(1 : int)
else if n % 2 = 0 then unchecked_cast $ `(λ n : int, bit0 n).subst (int.reflect ↑(n / 2))
else unchecked_cast $ `(λ n : int, bit1 n).subst (int.reflect ↑(n / 2))
| (int.neg_succ_of_nat n) := let rv := int.reflect (int.of_nat (n+1)) in unchecked_cast `(-%%rv : ℤ)
/-meta def f (z : ℤ) : expr := `(z)
set_option pp.all true
run_cmd tactic.trace $ f (-10)-/
--def rat_of_int (i : ℤ) : ℚ := --⟦⟨i, 1, zero_lt_one⟩⟧
--{ num := i, denom := 1,
/-meta def num_denum.to_expr : rat.num_denum → expr
| (num, ⟨denum, _⟩) := `((rat.of_int %%(int.reflect num)) / (rat.of_int (%%(int.reflect denum)) : ℚ))
meta def num_denum_to_expr_wf : Π a b : rat.num_denum, rat.rel a b → num_denum.to_expr a = num_denum.to_expr b := sorry
meta def rat.to_expr :=
quot.lift num_denum.to_expr num_denum_to_expr_wf
meta instance rat.reflect : has_reflect rat :=
λ q, unchecked_cast $ q.to_expr
-/
private meta def nat_to_rat_expr : nat → expr | n :=
if n = 0 then `(0 : ℚ)
else if n = 1 then `(1 : ℚ)
else if n % 2 = 0 then `(@bit0 ℚ _ %%(nat_to_rat_expr (n/2)))
else `(@bit1 ℚ _ _ %%(nat_to_rat_expr (n/2)))
private meta def int_to_rat_expr : int → expr | n :=
if n = 0 then `(0 : ℚ)
else if n < 0 then `(-%%(int_to_rat_expr (-n)) : ℚ)
else if n = 1 then `(1 : ℚ)
else if n % 2 = 0 then `(@bit0 ℚ _ %%(int_to_rat_expr (n/2)))
else `(@bit1 ℚ _ _ %%(int_to_rat_expr (n/2)))
meta def rat.to_expr (q : ℚ) : expr :=
if q.denom = 1 then
`(%%(int_to_rat_expr q.num) : ℚ)
else
`(%%(int_to_rat_expr q.num) / %%(nat_to_rat_expr q.denom) : ℚ)
--`(rat.mk_nat %%(int.reflect q.num) %%(nat.reflect q.denom))
meta instance rat.reflect : has_reflect rat :=
λ q, unchecked_cast $ q.to_expr
section
open nat
theorem gcd_ne_zero_right (a : ℕ) {b : ℕ} (hb : b ≠ 0) : gcd a b ≠ 0 :=
assume : gcd a b = 0,
have gcd a b ∣ b, from gcd_dvd_right _ _,
have 0 ∣ b, by cc,
have b = 0, from eq_zero_of_zero_dvd this,
by contradiction
end
def sign {α} [decidable_linear_ordered_comm_ring α] (a : α) : α :=
if a < 0 then (-1) else if a = 0 then 0 else 1
/-
section
open int
def int.gcd : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ
| (of_nat k1) (of_nat k2) := of_nat (nat.gcd k1 k2)
| (of_nat k1) (neg_succ_of_nat k2) := of_nat (nat.gcd k1 (k2+1))
| (neg_succ_of_nat k1) (of_nat k2) := of_nat (nat.gcd (k1+1) k2)
| (neg_succ_of_nat k1) (neg_succ_of_nat k2) := of_nat (nat.gcd (k1+1) (k2+1))
/-def int.sign : ℤ → ℤ
--| (of_nat 0) := 0
| (of_nat k) := if k = 0 then 0 else 1
| (neg_succ_of_nat _) := -1-/
/-def int.div : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ
| (of_nat k1) (of_nat k2) := of_nat (k1 / k2)
| (of_nat k1) (neg_succ_of_nat k2) := neg_succ_of_nat (k1 / (k2+1))
| (neg_succ_of_nat k1) (of_nat k2) := neg_succ_of_nat ((k1) / k2)
| (neg_succ_of_nat k1) (neg_succ_of_nat k2) := of_nat ((k1+1) / (k2+1))-/
def int.div (a b : ℤ) : ℤ :=
sign b *
(match a with
| of_nat m := of_nat (m / (nat_abs b))
| -[1+m] := -[1+ ((m:nat) / (nat_abs b))]
end)
instance : has_div int := ⟨int.div⟩
theorem int.of_nat_ne_zero_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) : of_nat n ≠ 0 :=
suppose of_nat n = of_nat 0,
by cc
@[ematch]
theorem int_gcd_ne_zero_right : Π (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (h : b ≠ 0), int.gcd a b ≠ 0 :=
begin
intros,
induction a,
all_goals {induction b; apply int.of_nat_ne_zero_of_ne_zero; apply gcd_ne_zero_right; finish}
end
theorem int.gcd_pos_of_ne_right (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (h : b ≠ 0) : int.gcd a b > 0 :=
begin
induction a,
all_goals {induction b; unfold int.gcd; apply of_nat_p},
end
/-
variable P : ℕ → Prop
theorem f : Π (h : P 0) (h2 : ∀ n, P n → P (n+1)), Π (n : ℕ), P n
| h h2 0 := sorry --begin try {do n ← decl_name, interactive.clear [n]}; finish end
| h h2 (k+1) := begin apply h2, apply f, apply h, apply h2 end
theorem int_gcd_ne_zero_right' : Π (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (h : b ≠ 0), int.gcd a b ≠ 0 :=
begin
intros,
cases a; cases b,
safe [int_gcd_ne_zero_right],
-/
/-| (of_nat k1) (of_nat k2) h := begin safe end
| (of_nat k1) (neg_succ_of_nat k2) h := sorry
| (neg_succ_of_nat k1) (of_nat k2) h := sorry
| (neg_succ_of_nat k1) (neg_succ_of_nat k2) h := sorry
-/
def num_denum.reduce : rat.num_denum → rat.num_denum | (num, ⟨denum, _⟩) :=
let g := int.gcd num denum in
(num/g, ⟨denum/g, begin end⟩)-/
/-set_option pp.all true
run_cmd tactic.trace $ (↑`(-5 : ℤ) : expr)
meta example (z : ℤ) : reflected z := by apply_instance
-/
/-
| n := if n = 0 then unchecked_cast `(0 : nat)
else if n % 2 = 0 then unchecked_cast $ `(λ n : nat, bit0 n).subst (nat.reflect (n / 2))
else unchecked_cast $ `(λ n : nat, bit1 n).subst (nat.reflect (n / 2))
-/
-- make this more efficient. Why did it disappear?
--meta instance : has_to_pexpr ℕ := ⟨λ n, nat.rec_on n ``(0) (λ _ k, ``(%%k + 1))⟩
--meta instance : has_to_pexpr ℤ :=
--⟨λ z, int.rec_on z (λ k, ``(%%k)) (λ k, ``(-(%%(k)+1)))⟩
/-meta def num_denum_format : rat.num_denum → format
| (num, ⟨denum, _⟩) :=
if num = 0 then "0"
--else if denum = 1 then to_fmt num
else to_fmt num ++ "/" ++ to_fmt denum
-/
/-meta def num_denum_quote : rat.num_denum → pexpr
| (num, ⟨denum, _⟩) := ``(%%(to_pexpr num)/%%(to_pexpr denum))-/
--meta def num_denum_format_wf : Π a b : rat.num_denum, rat.rel a b → num_denum_format a = num_denum_format b := sorry
--meta def num_denum_quote_wf : Π a b : rat.num_denum, rat.rel a b → num_denum_quote a = num_denum_quote b := sorry
meta def rat.to_string (q : ℚ) : string :=
if q.denom = 1 then
to_string q.num
else
to_string q.num ++ " / " ++ to_string q.denom
meta def rat.to_format (q : ℚ) : format :=
/-if q.denom = 1 then
to_fmt q.num
else
to_fmt q.num ++ " / " ++ to_fmt q.denom-/
rat.to_string q
meta instance : has_to_format ℚ :=
⟨rat.to_format⟩
meta instance : has_repr ℚ :=
⟨rat.to_string⟩
/-meta instance : has_to_pexpr ℚ :=
⟨quot.lift num_denum_quote num_denum_quote_wf⟩
-/
def rat.pow (q : ℚ) : ℤ → ℚ
| (int.of_nat n) := q^n
| -[1+n] := 1/(q^(n+1))
--def rat.pow (q : ℚ) (z : ℤ) : ℚ :=
--if q = 1 then q else if z = 1 then q else rat.pow_aux q z
lemma rat.mul_pow_neg_one {q : ℚ} (h : q ≠ 0) : q * (rat.pow q (-1)) = 1 :=
begin
change (-1 : ℤ) with -[1+0],
simp [rat.pow, mul_inv_cancel h]
end
lemma rat.pow_neg_one {q : ℚ} : rat.pow q (-1) = 1 / q :=
begin
change (-1 : ℤ) with -[1+0],
simp [rat.pow]
end
lemma rat.pow_one {q : ℚ} : rat.pow q 1 = q :=
begin
change (1 : ℤ) with int.of_nat 1,
simp [rat.pow]
end
lemma rat.pow_pow (a : ℚ) (z1 z2 : ℤ) : rat.pow (rat.pow a z1) z2 = rat.pow a (z1*z2) := sorry
lemma rat.one_div_pow (q : ℚ) (z : ℤ) : rat.pow (1/q) z = rat.pow q (-z) := sorry
namespace int
open nat
/-protected def div : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ
| (m : ℕ) (n : ℕ) := of_nat (m / n)
| (m : ℕ) -[1+ n] := -of_nat (m / succ n)
| -[1+ m] 0 := 0
| -[1+ m] (n+1:ℕ) := -[1+ m / succ n]
| -[1+ m] -[1+ n] := of_nat (succ (m / succ n))
instance : has_div int := ⟨int.div⟩
-/
theorem exists_eq_of_nat {z : ℤ} (h : z ≥ 0) : ∃ n : ℕ, z = n :=
match int.le.dest h with
| ⟨n, pr⟩ := ⟨n, by clear _match; finish⟩
end
end int
@[simp] theorem nat.one_pow : Π n : ℕ, nat.pow 1 n = 1
| 0 := rfl
| (k+1) := begin unfold nat.pow, rw mul_one, apply nat.one_pow end
theorem nat.one_lt_pow_of_one_lt {x n : ℕ} (h : 1 < x) (hn : n > 0) : 1 < nat.pow x n :=
have h : nat.pow 1 n = 1, from nat.one_pow _,
begin
rw ←h, apply nat.pow_lt_pow_of_lt_left,
repeat {assumption}
end
theorem rat.one_pow : Π (n : ℤ), rat.pow 1 n = 1
| (int.of_nat n) := by simp [rat.pow]
| -[1+n] := by simp [rat.pow, one_inv_eq]
theorem rat.mul_pow (q r : ℚ) : Π (z : ℤ), rat.pow (q*r) z = rat.pow q z * rat.pow r z
| (int.of_nat n) := mul_pow _ _ _
| -[1+n] := begin unfold rat.pow, rw [mul_pow, div_mul_eq_div_mul_one_div] end
theorem rat.mul_pow_rev (q r : ℚ) (z : ℤ) : rat.pow q z * rat.pow r z = rat.pow (q*r) z := by simp [rat.mul_pow]
def rat.order : ℚ → ℚ → ordering :=
λ a b, if a < b then ordering.lt else if a = b then ordering.eq else ordering.gt
def int.order : ℤ → ℤ → ordering :=
λ a b, if a < b then ordering.lt else if a = b then ordering.eq else ordering.gt
instance : has_ordering ℚ := ⟨rat.order⟩
instance : has_ordering ℤ := ⟨int.order⟩
|
aa760fde8faa2daa1df6bd6e4708f5caa437b5b8 | 57c233acf9386e610d99ed20ef139c5f97504ba3 | /src/data/multiset/locally_finite.lean | 888f045dd029c569d72d8564941d9de0686e32d2 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | robertylewis/mathlib | 3d16e3e6daf5ddde182473e03a1b601d2810952c | 1d13f5b932f5e40a8308e3840f96fc882fae01f0 | refs/heads/master | 1,651,379,945,369 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 98,875,504 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,644,253,514,000 | 1,501,495,700,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,516 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import data.finset.locally_finite
/-!
# Intervals as multisets
This file provides basic results about all the `multiset.Ixx`, which are defined in
`order.locally_finite`.
-/
variables {α : Type*}
namespace multiset
section preorder
variables [preorder α] [locally_finite_order α] {a b c : α}
lemma nodup_Icc : (Icc a b).nodup := finset.nodup _
lemma nodup_Ico : (Ico a b).nodup := finset.nodup _
lemma nodup_Ioc : (Ioc a b).nodup := finset.nodup _
lemma nodup_Ioo : (Ioo a b).nodup := finset.nodup _
@[simp] lemma Icc_eq_zero_iff : Icc a b = 0 ↔ ¬a ≤ b :=
by rw [Icc, finset.val_eq_zero, finset.Icc_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp] lemma Ico_eq_zero_iff : Ico a b = 0 ↔ ¬a < b :=
by rw [Ico, finset.val_eq_zero, finset.Ico_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp] lemma Ioc_eq_zero_iff : Ioc a b = 0 ↔ ¬a < b :=
by rw [Ioc, finset.val_eq_zero, finset.Ioc_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp] lemma Ioo_eq_zero_iff [densely_ordered α] : Ioo a b = 0 ↔ ¬a < b :=
by rw [Ioo, finset.val_eq_zero, finset.Ioo_eq_empty_iff]
alias Icc_eq_zero_iff ↔ _ multiset.Icc_eq_zero
alias Ico_eq_zero_iff ↔ _ multiset.Ico_eq_zero
alias Ioc_eq_zero_iff ↔ _ multiset.Ioc_eq_zero
@[simp] lemma Ioo_eq_zero (h : ¬a < b) : Ioo a b = 0 :=
eq_zero_iff_forall_not_mem.2 $ λ x hx, h ((mem_Ioo.1 hx).1.trans (mem_Ioo.1 hx).2)
@[simp] lemma Icc_eq_zero_of_lt (h : b < a) : Icc a b = 0 := Icc_eq_zero h.not_le
@[simp] lemma Ico_eq_zero_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ico a b = 0 := Ico_eq_zero h.not_lt
@[simp] lemma Ioc_eq_zero_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioc a b = 0 := Ioc_eq_zero h.not_lt
@[simp] lemma Ioo_eq_zero_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioo a b = 0 := Ioo_eq_zero h.not_lt
variables (a)
@[simp] lemma Ico_self : Ico a a = 0 := by rw [Ico, finset.Ico_self, finset.empty_val]
@[simp] lemma Ioc_self : Ioc a a = 0 := by rw [Ioc, finset.Ioc_self, finset.empty_val]
@[simp] lemma Ioo_self : Ioo a a = 0 := by rw [Ioo, finset.Ioo_self, finset.empty_val]
variables {a b c}
lemma left_mem_Icc : a ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := finset.left_mem_Icc
lemma left_mem_Ico : a ∈ Ico a b ↔ a < b := finset.left_mem_Ico
lemma right_mem_Icc : b ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := finset.right_mem_Icc
lemma right_mem_Ioc : b ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < b := finset.right_mem_Ioc
@[simp] lemma left_not_mem_Ioc : a ∉ Ioc a b := finset.left_not_mem_Ioc
@[simp] lemma left_not_mem_Ioo : a ∉ Ioo a b := finset.left_not_mem_Ioo
@[simp] lemma right_not_mem_Ico : b ∉ Ico a b := finset.right_not_mem_Ico
@[simp] lemma right_not_mem_Ioo : b ∉ Ioo a b := finset.right_not_mem_Ioo
lemma Ico_filter_lt_of_le_left [decidable_pred (< c)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
(Ico a b).filter (λ x, x < c) = ∅ :=
by { rw [Ico, ←finset.filter_val, finset.Ico_filter_lt_of_le_left hca], refl }
lemma Ico_filter_lt_of_right_le [decidable_pred (< c)] (hbc : b ≤ c) :
(Ico a b).filter (λ x, x < c) = Ico a b :=
by rw [Ico, ←finset.filter_val, finset.Ico_filter_lt_of_right_le hbc]
lemma Ico_filter_lt_of_le_right [decidable_pred (< c)] (hcb : c ≤ b) :
(Ico a b).filter (λ x, x < c) = Ico a c :=
by { rw [Ico, ←finset.filter_val, finset.Ico_filter_lt_of_le_right hcb], refl }
lemma Ico_filter_le_of_le_left [decidable_pred ((≤) c)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
(Ico a b).filter (λ x, c ≤ x) = Ico a b :=
by rw [Ico, ←finset.filter_val, finset.Ico_filter_le_of_le_left hca]
lemma Ico_filter_le_of_right_le [decidable_pred ((≤) b)] :
(Ico a b).filter (λ x, b ≤ x) = ∅ :=
by { rw [Ico, ←finset.filter_val, finset.Ico_filter_le_of_right_le], refl }
lemma Ico_filter_le_of_left_le [decidable_pred ((≤) c)] (hac : a ≤ c) :
(Ico a b).filter (λ x, c ≤ x) = Ico c b :=
by { rw [Ico, ←finset.filter_val, finset.Ico_filter_le_of_left_le hac], refl }
end preorder
section partial_order
variables [partial_order α] [locally_finite_order α] {a b : α}
@[simp] lemma Icc_self (a : α) : Icc a a = {a} := by rw [Icc, finset.Icc_self, finset.singleton_val]
lemma Ico_cons_right (h : a ≤ b) : b ::ₘ (Ico a b) = Icc a b :=
by { classical,
rw [Ico, ←finset.insert_val_of_not_mem right_not_mem_Ico, finset.Ico_insert_right h], refl }
lemma Ioo_cons_left (h : a < b) : a ::ₘ (Ioo a b) = Ico a b :=
by { classical,
rw [Ioo, ←finset.insert_val_of_not_mem left_not_mem_Ioo, finset.Ioo_insert_left h], refl }
lemma Ico_disjoint_Ico {a b c d : α} (h : b ≤ c) : (Ico a b).disjoint (Ico c d) :=
λ x hab hbc, by { rw mem_Ico at hab hbc, exact hab.2.not_le (h.trans hbc.1) }
@[simp] lemma Ico_inter_Ico_of_le [decidable_eq α] {a b c d : α} (h : b ≤ c) :
Ico a b ∩ Ico c d = 0 :=
multiset.inter_eq_zero_iff_disjoint.2 $ Ico_disjoint_Ico h
lemma Ico_filter_le_left {a b : α} [decidable_pred (≤ a)] (hab : a < b) :
(Ico a b).filter (λ x, x ≤ a) = {a} :=
by { rw [Ico, ←finset.filter_val, finset.Ico_filter_le_left hab], refl }
lemma card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one (a b : α) : (Ico a b).card = (Icc a b).card - 1 :=
finset.card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one _ _
lemma card_Ioc_eq_card_Icc_sub_one (a b : α) : (Ioc a b).card = (Icc a b).card - 1 :=
finset.card_Ioc_eq_card_Icc_sub_one _ _
lemma card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one (a b : α) : (Ioo a b).card = (Ico a b).card - 1 :=
finset.card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one _ _
lemma card_Ioo_eq_card_Icc_sub_two (a b : α) : (Ioo a b).card = (Icc a b).card - 2 :=
finset.card_Ioo_eq_card_Icc_sub_two _ _
end partial_order
section linear_order
variables [linear_order α] [locally_finite_order α] {a b c d : α}
lemma Ico_subset_Ico_iff {a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ : α} (h : a₁ < b₁) :
Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
finset.Ico_subset_Ico_iff h
lemma Ico_add_Ico_eq_Ico {a b c : α} (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) :
Ico a b + Ico b c = Ico a c :=
by rw [add_eq_union_iff_disjoint.2 (Ico_disjoint_Ico le_rfl), Ico, Ico, Ico, ←finset.union_val,
finset.Ico_union_Ico_eq_Ico hab hbc]
lemma Ico_inter_Ico : Ico a b ∩ Ico c d = Ico (max a c) (min b d) :=
by rw [Ico, Ico, Ico, ←finset.inter_val, finset.Ico_inter_Ico]
@[simp] lemma Ico_filter_lt (a b c : α) : (Ico a b).filter (λ x, x < c) = Ico a (min b c) :=
by rw [Ico, Ico, ←finset.filter_val, finset.Ico_filter_lt]
@[simp] lemma Ico_filter_le (a b c : α) : (Ico a b).filter (λ x, c ≤ x) = Ico (max a c) b :=
by rw [Ico, Ico, ←finset.filter_val, finset.Ico_filter_le]
@[simp] lemma Ico_sub_Ico_left (a b c : α) : Ico a b - Ico a c = Ico (max a c) b :=
by rw [Ico, Ico, Ico, ←finset.sdiff_val, finset.Ico_diff_Ico_left]
@[simp] lemma Ico_sub_Ico_right (a b c : α) : Ico a b - Ico c b = Ico a (min b c) :=
by rw [Ico, Ico, Ico, ←finset.sdiff_val, finset.Ico_diff_Ico_right]
end linear_order
section ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid
variables [ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid α] [has_exists_add_of_le α] [locally_finite_order α]
lemma map_add_left_Icc (a b c : α) : (Icc a b).map ((+) c) = Icc (c + a) (c + b) :=
by { classical, rw [Icc, Icc, ←finset.image_add_left_Icc, finset.image_val,
(multiset.nodup_map (add_right_injective c) $ finset.nodup _).erase_dup] }
lemma map_add_left_Ico (a b c : α) : (Ico a b).map ((+) c) = Ico (c + a) (c + b) :=
by { classical, rw [Ico, Ico, ←finset.image_add_left_Ico, finset.image_val,
(multiset.nodup_map (add_right_injective c) $ finset.nodup _).erase_dup] }
lemma map_add_left_Ioc (a b c : α) : (Ioc a b).map ((+) c) = Ioc (c + a) (c + b) :=
by { classical, rw [Ioc, Ioc, ←finset.image_add_left_Ioc, finset.image_val,
(multiset.nodup_map (add_right_injective c) $ finset.nodup _).erase_dup] }
lemma map_add_left_Ioo (a b c : α) : (Ioo a b).map ((+) c) = Ioo (c + a) (c + b) :=
by { classical, rw [Ioo, Ioo, ←finset.image_add_left_Ioo, finset.image_val,
(multiset.nodup_map (add_right_injective c) $ finset.nodup _).erase_dup] }
lemma map_add_right_Icc (a b c : α) : (Icc a b).map (λ x, x + c) = Icc (a + c) (b + c) :=
by { simp_rw add_comm _ c, exact map_add_left_Icc _ _ _ }
lemma map_add_right_Ico (a b c : α) : (Ico a b).map (λ x, x + c) = Ico (a + c) (b + c) :=
by { simp_rw add_comm _ c, exact map_add_left_Ico _ _ _ }
lemma map_add_right_Ioc (a b c : α) : (Ioc a b).map (λ x, x + c) = Ioc (a + c) (b + c) :=
by { simp_rw add_comm _ c, exact map_add_left_Ioc _ _ _ }
lemma map_add_right_Ioo (a b c : α) : (Ioo a b).map (λ x, x + c) = Ioo (a + c) (b + c) :=
by { simp_rw add_comm _ c, exact map_add_left_Ioo _ _ _ }
end ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid
end multiset
|
45469a46f2b96aaba40ac5917d54352599d8d6f4 | efce24474b28579aba3272fdb77177dc2b11d7aa | /src/category_theory/replete.lean | 312e8323a5b60bc1c9a806a2ecfdba3d4e7f80b0 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | rwbarton/lean-homotopy-theory | cff499f24268d60e1c546e7c86c33f58c62888ed | 39e1b4ea1ed1b0eca2f68bc64162dde6a6396dee | refs/heads/lean-3.4.2 | 1,622,711,883,224 | 1,598,550,958,000 | 1,598,550,958,000 | 136,023,667 | 12 | 6 | Apache-2.0 | 1,573,187,573,000 | 1,528,116,262,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,884 | lean | import category_theory.base
import category_theory.isomorphism
open category_theory
open category_theory.category
local notation f ` ∘ `:80 g:80 := g ≫ f
universes v u
namespace category_theory
variables (C : Type u) [category.{v} C]
class wide_subcategory (D : Π {a b : C}, (a ⟶ b) → Prop) : Prop :=
(mem_id {} : ∀ (a : C), D (𝟙 a))
(mem_comp {} : ∀ {a b c : C} {f : a ⟶ b} {g : b ⟶ c}, D f → D g → D (g ∘ f))
export wide_subcategory (mem_id mem_comp)
class replete_wide_subcategory D extends wide_subcategory.{v} C D : Prop :=
(mem_iso {} : ∀ {a b : C} (i : iso a b), D i.hom)
export replete_wide_subcategory (mem_iso)
variables {C}
-- mem_id is redundant when we have mem_iso.
lemma replete_wide_subcategory.mk' {D : Π ⦃a b : C⦄, (a ⟶ b) → Prop}
(mem_iso : ∀ {a b : C} (i : iso a b), D i.hom)
(mem_comp : ∀ {a b c : C} {f : a ⟶ b} {g : b ⟶ c}, D f → D g → D (g ∘ f)) :
replete_wide_subcategory.{v} C D :=
{ mem_id := λ a, mem_iso (iso.refl a),
mem_comp := @mem_comp,
mem_iso := @mem_iso }
variables {D : Π ⦃a b : C⦄, (a ⟶ b) → Prop} [replete_wide_subcategory.{v} C D]
lemma mem_of_mem_comp_left {a b c : C} {f : a ⟶ b} (i : iso b c)
(h : D (i.hom ∘ f)) : D f :=
by convert mem_comp h (mem_iso i.symm); simp
lemma mem_of_mem_comp_right {a b c : C} {f : b ⟶ c} (i : iso a b)
(h : D (f ∘ i.hom)) : D f :=
by convert mem_comp (mem_iso i.symm) h; simp
lemma mem_iff_mem_of_isomorphic {a b a' b' : C} {f : a ⟶ b} {f' : a' ⟶ b'}
(i : iso a a') (j : iso b b')
(e : j.hom ∘ f = f' ∘ i.hom) : D f ↔ D f' :=
iff.intro
(assume h, have D (j.hom ∘ f), from mem_comp h (mem_iso j),
by rw e at this; exact mem_of_mem_comp_right i this)
(assume h, have D (f' ∘ i.hom), from mem_comp (mem_iso i) h,
by rw ←e at this; exact mem_of_mem_comp_left j this)
end category_theory
|
e09976b05c429d947f013ffd89a5fb17bf464d35 | 618003631150032a5676f229d13a079ac875ff77 | /src/tactic/wlog.lean | b51c0960a5451fa1a0ea8f523080291bc7c0a1af | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | awainverse/mathlib | 939b68c8486df66cfda64d327ad3d9165248c777 | ea76bd8f3ca0a8bf0a166a06a475b10663dec44a | refs/heads/master | 1,659,592,962,036 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 268,436,019 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,590,990,500,000 | 1,590,990,500,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,426 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
Without loss of generality tactic.
-/
import tactic.tauto
import data.list.perm
open expr tactic lean lean.parser
local postfix `?`:9001 := optional
local postfix *:9001 := many
namespace tactic
private meta def update_pp_name : expr → name → expr
| (local_const n _ bi d) pp := local_const n pp bi d
| e n := e
private meta def elim_or : ℕ → expr → tactic (list expr)
| 0 h := fail "zero cases"
| 1 h := return [h]
| (n + 1) h := do
[(_, [hl], []), (_, [hr], [])] ← induction h, -- there should be no dependent terms
[gl, gr] ← get_goals,
set_goals [gr],
hsr ← elim_or n hr,
gsr ← get_goals,
set_goals (gl :: gsr),
return (hl :: hsr)
private meta def dest_or : expr → tactic (list expr) | e := do
`(%%a ∨ %%b) ← whnf e | return [e],
lb ← dest_or b,
return (a :: lb)
private meta def match_perms (pat : pattern) : expr → tactic (list $ list expr) | t :=
(do
m ← match_pattern pat t,
guard (m.2.all expr.is_local_constant),
return [m.2]) <|>
(do
`(%%l ∨ %%r) ← whnf t,
m ← match_pattern pat l,
rs ← match_perms r,
return (m.2 :: rs))
private meta def update_type : expr → expr → expr
| (local_const n pp bi d) t := local_const n pp bi t
| e t := e
private meta def intron' : ℕ → tactic (list expr)
| 0 := return []
| (i + 1) := do
n ← intro1,
ls ← intron' i,
return (n :: ls)
meta def wlog (vars' : list expr) (h_cases fst_case : expr) (perms : list (list expr)) :
tactic unit := do
guard h_cases.is_local_constant,
-- reorder s.t. context is Γ ⬝ vars ⬝ cases ⊢ ∀deps, …
nr ← revert_lst (vars' ++ [h_cases]),
vars ← intron' vars'.length,
h_cases ← intro h_cases.local_pp_name,
cases ← infer_type h_cases,
h_fst_case ←
mk_local_def h_cases.local_pp_name
(fst_case.instantiate_locals $ (vars'.zip vars).map $ λ⟨o, n⟩, (o.local_uniq_name, n)),
((), pr) ← solve_aux cases (repeat $ exact h_fst_case <|> left >> skip),
t ← target,
fixed_vars ← vars.mmap (λv, do t ← infer_type v, return (update_type v t) ),
let t' := (instantiate_local h_cases.local_uniq_name pr t).pis (fixed_vars ++ [h_fst_case]),
(h, [g]) ← local_proof `this t' (do
clear h_cases,
vars.mmap clear,
intron nr),
h₀ :: hs ← elim_or perms.length h_cases,
solve1 (do
exact (h.mk_app $ vars ++ [h₀])),
focus ((hs.zip perms.tail).map $ λ⟨h_case, perm⟩, do
let p_v := (vars'.zip vars).map (λ⟨p, v⟩, (p.local_uniq_name, v)),
let p := perm.map (λp, p.instantiate_locals p_v),
note `this none (h.mk_app $ p ++ [h_case]),
clear h,
return ()),
gs ← get_goals,
set_goals (g :: gs)
namespace interactive
open interactive interactive.types expr
private meta def parse_permutations : option (list (list name)) → tactic (list (list expr))
| none := return []
| (some []) := return []
| (some perms@(p₀ :: ps)) := do
(guard p₀.nodup <|>
fail "No permutation `xs_i` in `using [xs_1, …, xs_n]` should contain the same variable twice."),
(guard (perms.all $ λp, p.perm p₀) <|>
fail "The permutations `xs_i` in `using [xs_1, …, xs_n]` must be permutations of the same variables."),
perms.mmap (λp, p.mmap get_local)
/-- Without loss of generality: reduces to one goal under variables permutations.
Given a goal of the form `g xs`, a predicate `p` over a set of variables, as well as variable
permutations `xs_i`. Then `wlog` produces goals of the form
The case goal, i.e. the permutation `xs_i` covers all possible cases:
`⊢ p xs_0 ∨ ⋯ ∨ p xs_n`
The main goal, i.e. the goal reduced to `xs_0`:
`(h : p xs_0) ⊢ g xs_0`
The invariant goals, i.e. `g` is invariant under `xs_i`:
`(h : p xs_i) (this : g xs_0) ⊢ gs xs_i`
Either the permutation is provided, or a proof of the disjunction is provided to compute the
permutation. The disjunction need to be in assoc normal form, e.g. `p₀ ∨ (p₁ ∨ p₂)`. In many cases
the invariant goals can be solved by AC rewriting using `cc` etc.
Example:
On a state `(n m : ℕ) ⊢ p n m` the tactic `wlog h : n ≤ m using [n m, m n]` produces the following
states:
`(n m : ℕ) ⊢ n ≤ m ∨ m ≤ n`
`(n m : ℕ) (h : n ≤ m) ⊢ p n m`
`(n m : ℕ) (h : m ≤ n) (this : p n m) ⊢ p m n`
`wlog` supports different calling conventions. The name `h` is used to give a name to the introduced
case hypothesis. If the name is avoided, the default will be `case`.
(1) `wlog : p xs0 using [xs0, …, xsn]`
Results in the case goal `p xs0 ∨ ⋯ ∨ ps xsn`, the main goal `(case : p xs0) ⊢ g xs0` and the
invariance goals `(case : p xsi) (this : g xs0) ⊢ g xsi`.
(2) `wlog : p xs0 := r using xs0`
The expression `r` is a proof of the shape `p xs0 ∨ ⋯ ∨ p xsi`, it is also used to compute the
variable permutations.
(3) `wlog := r using xs0`
The expression `r` is a proof of the shape `p xs0 ∨ ⋯ ∨ p xsi`, it is also used to compute the
variable permutations. This is not as stable as (2), for example `p` cannot be a disjunction.
(4) `wlog : R x y using x y` and `wlog : R x y`
Produces the case `R x y ∨ R y x`. If `R` is ≤, then the disjunction discharged using linearity.
If `using x y` is avoided then `x` and `y` are the last two variables appearing in the
expression `R x y`. -/
meta def wlog
(h : parse ident?)
(pat : parse (tk ":" *> texpr)?)
(cases : parse (tk ":=" *> texpr)?)
(perms : parse (tk "using" *> (list_of (ident*) <|> (λx, [x]) <$> ident*))?)
(discharger : tactic unit :=
(tactic.solve_by_elim <|> tactic.tautology tt <|> using_smt (smt_tactic.intros >> smt_tactic.solve_goals))) :
tactic unit := do
perms ← parse_permutations perms,
(pat, cases_pr, cases_goal, vars, perms) ← (match cases with
| some r := do
vars::_ ← return perms |
fail "At least one set of variables expected, i.e. `using x y` or `using [x y, y x]`.",
cases_pr ← to_expr r,
cases_pr ← (if cases_pr.is_local_constant
then return $ match h with some n := update_pp_name cases_pr n | none := cases_pr end
else do
note (h.get_or_else `case) none cases_pr),
cases ← infer_type cases_pr,
(pat, perms') ← match pat with
| some pat := do
pat ← to_expr pat,
let vars' := vars.filter $ λv, v.occurs pat,
case_pat ← mk_pattern [] vars' pat [] vars',
perms' ← match_perms case_pat cases,
return (pat, perms')
| none := do
(p :: ps) ← dest_or cases,
let vars' := vars.filter $ λv, v.occurs p,
case_pat ← mk_pattern [] vars' p [] vars',
perms' ← (p :: ps).mmap (λp, do m ← match_pattern case_pat p, return m.2),
return (p, perms')
end,
let vars_name := vars.map local_uniq_name,
guard (perms'.all $ λp, p.all $ λv, v.is_local_constant ∧ v.local_uniq_name ∈ vars_name) <|>
fail "Cases contains variables not declared in `using x y z`",
perms ← (if perms.length = 1
then do
return (perms'.map $ λp, p ++ vars.filter (λv, p.all (λv', v'.local_uniq_name ≠ v.local_uniq_name)))
else do
guard (perms.length = perms'.length) <|>
fail "The provided permutation list has a different length then the provided cases.",
return perms),
return (pat, cases_pr, @none expr, vars, perms)
| none := do
let name_h := h.get_or_else `case,
some pat ← return pat | fail "Either specify cases or a pattern with permutations",
pat ← to_expr pat,
(do
[x, y] ← match perms with
| [] := return pat.list_local_consts
| [l] := return l
| _ := failed
end,
let cases := mk_or_lst [pat, pat.instantiate_locals [(x.local_uniq_name, y), (y.local_uniq_name, x)]],
(do
`(%%x' ≤ %%y') ← return pat,
(cases_pr, []) ← local_proof name_h cases (exact ``(le_total %%x' %%y')),
return (pat, cases_pr, none, [x, y], [[x, y], [y, x]]))
<|>
(do
(cases_pr, [g]) ← local_proof name_h cases skip,
return (pat, cases_pr, some g, [x, y], [[x, y], [y, x]]))) <|>
(do
guard (perms.length ≥ 2) <|>
fail ("To generate cases at least two permutations are required, i.e. `using [x y, y x]`" ++
" or exactly 0 or 2 variables"),
(vars :: perms') ← return perms,
let names := vars.map local_uniq_name,
let cases := mk_or_lst (pat :: perms'.map (λp, pat.instantiate_locals (names.zip p))),
(cases_pr, [g]) ← local_proof name_h cases skip,
return (pat, cases_pr, some g, vars, perms))
end),
let name_fn :=
(if perms.length = 2 then λi, `invariant else λi, mk_simple_name ("invariant_" ++ to_string (i + 1))),
with_enable_tags $ tactic.focus1 $ do
t ← get_main_tag,
tactic.wlog vars cases_pr pat perms,
tactic.focus (set_main_tag (mk_num_name `_case 0 :: `main :: t) ::
(list.range (perms.length - 1)).map (λi, do
set_main_tag (mk_num_name `_case 0 :: name_fn i :: t),
try discharger)),
match cases_goal with
| some g := do
set_tag g (mk_num_name `_case 0 :: `cases :: t),
gs ← get_goals,
set_goals (g :: gs)
| none := skip
end
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "wlog",
category := doc_category.tactic,
decl_names := [``wlog],
tags := ["logic"] }
end interactive
end tactic
|
4802994c1f10512a739093cd8a39f7036064a273 | e39f04f6ff425fe3b3f5e26a8998b817d1dba80f | /category_theory/examples/topological_spaces.lean | 00ce5dc816e99d74e59e7b845c8e0131971cdfae | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kristychoi/mathlib | c504b5e8f84e272ea1d8966693c42de7523bf0ec | 257fd84fe98927ff4a5ffe044f68c4e9d235cc75 | refs/heads/master | 1,586,520,722,896 | 1,544,030,145,000 | 1,544,031,933,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,119 | lean | -- Copyright (c) 2017 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
-- Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-- Authors: Patrick Massot, Scott Morrison, Mario Carneiro
import category_theory.full_subcategory
import category_theory.functor_category
import category_theory.natural_isomorphism
import analysis.topology.topological_space
import analysis.topology.continuity
import order.galois_connection
open category_theory
open category_theory.nat_iso
open topological_space
universe u
namespace category_theory.examples
/-- The category of topological spaces and continuous maps. -/
@[reducible] def Top : Type (u+1) := bundled topological_space
instance (x : Top) : topological_space x := x.str
namespace Top
instance : concrete_category @continuous := ⟨@continuous_id, @continuous.comp⟩
-- local attribute [class] continuous
-- instance {R S : Top} (f : R ⟶ S) : continuous (f : R → S) := f.2
end Top
variables {X : Top.{u}}
instance : small_category (opens X) := by apply_instance
def nbhd (x : X.α) := { U : opens X // x ∈ U }
def nbhds (x : X.α) : small_category (nbhd x) := begin unfold nbhd, apply_instance end
/-- `opens.map f` gives the functor from open sets in Y to open set in X,
given by taking preimages under f. -/
def map
{X Y : Top.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) : opens Y ⥤ opens X :=
{ obj := λ U, ⟨ f.val ⁻¹' U, f.property _ U.property ⟩,
map := λ U V i, ⟨ ⟨ λ a b, i.down.down b ⟩ ⟩ }.
@[simp] lemma map_id_obj (X : Top.{u}) (U : opens X) : (map (𝟙 X)).obj U = U := by tidy
@[simp] def map_id (X : Top.{u}) : map (𝟙 X) ≅ functor.id (opens X) :=
{ hom := { app := λ U, 𝟙 U },
inv := { app := λ U, 𝟙 U } }
-- We could make f g implicit here, but it's nice to be able to see when
-- they are the identity (often!)
def map_iso {X Y : Top.{u}} (f g : X ⟶ Y) (h : f = g) : map f ≅ map g :=
nat_iso.of_components (λ U, eq_to_iso (congr_fun (congr_arg _ (congr_arg _ h)) _) ) (by obviously)
@[simp] def map_iso_id {X : Top.{u}} (h) : map_iso (𝟙 X) (𝟙 X) h = iso.refl (map _) := rfl
end category_theory.examples
|
901125157e1de630b9fbf403abfb77ca99337c85 | abd85493667895c57a7507870867b28124b3998f | /src/topology/instances/ennreal.lean | c4e66c879cf56a08833949cd0b134844399d68b9 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | pechersky/mathlib | d56eef16bddb0bfc8bc552b05b7270aff5944393 | f1df14c2214ee114c9738e733efd5de174deb95d | refs/heads/master | 1,666,714,392,571 | 1,591,747,567,000 | 1,591,747,567,000 | 270,557,274 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,591,597,975,000 | 1,591,597,974,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 38,698 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import topology.instances.nnreal
/-!
# Extended non-negative reals
-/
noncomputable theory
open classical set filter metric
open_locale classical
open_locale topological_space
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
open_locale ennreal big_operators
namespace ennreal
variables {a b c d : ennreal} {r p q : nnreal}
variables {x y z : ennreal} {ε ε₁ ε₂ : ennreal} {s : set ennreal}
section topological_space
open topological_space
/-- Topology on `ennreal`.
Note: this is different from the `emetric_space` topology. The `emetric_space` topology has
`is_open {⊤}`, while this topology doesn't have singleton elements. -/
instance : topological_space ennreal := preorder.topology ennreal
instance : order_topology ennreal := ⟨rfl⟩
instance : t2_space ennreal := by apply_instance -- short-circuit type class inference
instance : second_countable_topology ennreal :=
⟨⟨⋃q ≥ (0:ℚ), {{a : ennreal | a < nnreal.of_real q}, {a : ennreal | ↑(nnreal.of_real q) < a}},
(countable_encodable _).bUnion $ assume a ha, (countable_singleton _).insert _,
le_antisymm
(le_generate_from $ by simp [or_imp_distrib, is_open_lt', is_open_gt'] {contextual := tt})
(le_generate_from $ λ s h, begin
rcases h with ⟨a, hs | hs⟩;
[ rw show s = ⋃q∈{q:ℚ | 0 ≤ q ∧ a < nnreal.of_real q}, {b | ↑(nnreal.of_real q) < b},
from set.ext (assume b, by simp [hs, @ennreal.lt_iff_exists_rat_btwn a b, and_assoc]),
rw show s = ⋃q∈{q:ℚ | 0 ≤ q ∧ ↑(nnreal.of_real q) < a}, {b | b < ↑(nnreal.of_real q)},
from set.ext (assume b, by simp [hs, @ennreal.lt_iff_exists_rat_btwn b a, and_comm, and_assoc])];
{ apply is_open_Union, intro q,
apply is_open_Union, intro hq,
exact generate_open.basic _ (mem_bUnion hq.1 $ by simp) }
end)⟩⟩
lemma embedding_coe : embedding (coe : nnreal → ennreal) :=
⟨⟨begin
refine le_antisymm _ _,
{ rw [@order_topology.topology_eq_generate_intervals ennreal _,
← coinduced_le_iff_le_induced],
refine le_generate_from (assume s ha, _),
rcases ha with ⟨a, rfl | rfl⟩,
show is_open {b : nnreal | a < ↑b},
{ cases a; simp [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, is_open_lt'] },
show is_open {b : nnreal | ↑b < a},
{ cases a; simp [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, is_open_gt', is_open_const] } },
{ rw [@order_topology.topology_eq_generate_intervals nnreal _],
refine le_generate_from (assume s ha, _),
rcases ha with ⟨a, rfl | rfl⟩,
exact ⟨Ioi a, is_open_Ioi, by simp [Ioi]⟩,
exact ⟨Iio a, is_open_Iio, by simp [Iio]⟩ }
end⟩,
assume a b, coe_eq_coe.1⟩
lemma is_open_ne_top : is_open {a : ennreal | a ≠ ⊤} := is_open_ne
lemma is_open_Ico_zero : is_open (Ico 0 b) := by { rw ennreal.Ico_eq_Iio, exact is_open_Iio}
lemma coe_range_mem_nhds : range (coe : nnreal → ennreal) ∈ 𝓝 (r : ennreal) :=
have {a : ennreal | a ≠ ⊤} = range (coe : nnreal → ennreal),
from set.ext $ assume a, by cases a; simp [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe],
this ▸ mem_nhds_sets is_open_ne_top coe_ne_top
@[norm_cast] lemma tendsto_coe {f : filter α} {m : α → nnreal} {a : nnreal} :
tendsto (λa, (m a : ennreal)) f (𝓝 ↑a) ↔ tendsto m f (𝓝 a) :=
embedding_coe.tendsto_nhds_iff.symm
lemma continuous_coe {α} [topological_space α] {f : α → nnreal} :
continuous (λa, (f a : ennreal)) ↔ continuous f :=
embedding_coe.continuous_iff.symm
lemma nhds_coe {r : nnreal} : 𝓝 (r : ennreal) = (𝓝 r).map coe :=
by rw [embedding_coe.induced, map_nhds_induced_eq coe_range_mem_nhds]
lemma nhds_coe_coe {r p : nnreal} : 𝓝 ((r : ennreal), (p : ennreal)) =
(𝓝 (r, p)).map (λp:nnreal×nnreal, (p.1, p.2)) :=
begin
rw [(embedding_coe.prod_mk embedding_coe).map_nhds_eq],
rw [← prod_range_range_eq],
exact prod_mem_nhds_sets coe_range_mem_nhds coe_range_mem_nhds
end
lemma continuous_of_real : continuous ennreal.of_real :=
(continuous_coe.2 continuous_id).comp nnreal.continuous_of_real
lemma tendsto_of_real {f : filter α} {m : α → ℝ} {a : ℝ} (h : tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) :
tendsto (λa, ennreal.of_real (m a)) f (𝓝 (ennreal.of_real a)) :=
tendsto.comp (continuous.tendsto continuous_of_real _) h
lemma tendsto_to_nnreal {a : ennreal} : a ≠ ⊤ →
tendsto (ennreal.to_nnreal) (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a.to_nnreal) :=
begin
cases a; simp [some_eq_coe, none_eq_top, nhds_coe, tendsto_map'_iff, (∘)],
exact tendsto_id
end
lemma continuous_on_to_nnreal : continuous_on ennreal.to_nnreal {a | a ≠ ∞} :=
continuous_on_iff_continuous_restrict.2 $ continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ λ x,
(tendsto_to_nnreal x.2).comp continuous_at_subtype_val
lemma tendsto_to_real {a : ennreal} : a ≠ ⊤ → tendsto (ennreal.to_real) (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a.to_real) :=
λ ha, tendsto.comp ((@nnreal.tendsto_coe _ (𝓝 a.to_nnreal) id (a.to_nnreal)).2 tendsto_id)
(tendsto_to_nnreal ha)
lemma tendsto_nhds_top {m : α → ennreal} {f : filter α}
(h : ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ a in f, ↑n < m a) : tendsto m f (𝓝 ⊤) :=
tendsto_nhds_generate_from $ assume s hs,
match s, hs with
| _, ⟨none, or.inl rfl⟩, hr := (lt_irrefl ⊤ hr).elim
| _, ⟨some r, or.inl rfl⟩, hr :=
let ⟨n, hrn⟩ := exists_nat_gt r in
mem_sets_of_superset (h n) $ assume a hnma, show ↑r < m a, from
lt_trans (show (r : ennreal) < n, from (coe_nat n) ▸ coe_lt_coe.2 hrn) hnma
| _, ⟨a, or.inr rfl⟩, hr := (not_top_lt $ show ⊤ < a, from hr).elim
end
lemma tendsto_nat_nhds_top : tendsto (λ n : ℕ, ↑n) at_top (𝓝 ∞) :=
tendsto_nhds_top $ λ n, mem_at_top_sets.2
⟨n+1, λ m hm, ennreal.coe_nat_lt_coe_nat.2 $ nat.lt_of_succ_le hm⟩
lemma nhds_top : 𝓝 ∞ = ⨅a ≠ ∞, principal (Ioi a) :=
nhds_top_order.trans $ by simp [lt_top_iff_ne_top, Ioi]
lemma nhds_zero : 𝓝 (0 : ennreal) = ⨅a ≠ 0, principal (Iio a) :=
nhds_bot_order.trans $ by simp [bot_lt_iff_ne_bot, Iio]
/-- The set of finite `ennreal` numbers is homeomorphic to `nnreal`. -/
def ne_top_homeomorph_nnreal : {a | a ≠ ∞} ≃ₜ nnreal :=
{ to_fun := λ x, ennreal.to_nnreal x,
inv_fun := λ x, ⟨x, coe_ne_top⟩,
left_inv := λ ⟨x, hx⟩, subtype.eq $ coe_to_nnreal hx,
right_inv := λ x, to_nnreal_coe,
continuous_to_fun := continuous_on_iff_continuous_restrict.1 continuous_on_to_nnreal,
continuous_inv_fun := continuous_subtype_mk _ (continuous_coe.2 continuous_id) }
/-- The set of finite `ennreal` numbers is homeomorphic to `nnreal`. -/
def lt_top_homeomorph_nnreal : {a | a < ∞} ≃ₜ nnreal :=
by refine (homeomorph.set_congr $ set.ext $ λ x, _).trans ne_top_homeomorph_nnreal;
simp only [mem_set_of_eq, lt_top_iff_ne_top]
-- using Icc because
-- • don't have 'Ioo (x - ε) (x + ε) ∈ 𝓝 x' unless x > 0
-- • (x - y ≤ ε ↔ x ≤ ε + y) is true, while (x - y < ε ↔ x < ε + y) is not
@[nolint ge_or_gt] -- see Note [nolint_ge]
lemma Icc_mem_nhds : x ≠ ⊤ → ε > 0 → Icc (x - ε) (x + ε) ∈ 𝓝 x :=
begin
assume xt ε0, rw mem_nhds_sets_iff,
by_cases x0 : x = 0,
{ use Iio (x + ε),
have : Iio (x + ε) ⊆ Icc (x - ε) (x + ε), assume a, rw x0, simpa using le_of_lt,
use this, exact ⟨is_open_Iio, mem_Iio_self_add xt ε0⟩ },
{ use Ioo (x - ε) (x + ε), use Ioo_subset_Icc_self,
exact ⟨is_open_Ioo, mem_Ioo_self_sub_add xt x0 ε0 ε0 ⟩ }
end
@[nolint ge_or_gt] -- see Note [nolint_ge]
lemma nhds_of_ne_top : x ≠ ⊤ → 𝓝 x = ⨅ε > 0, principal (Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)) :=
begin
assume xt, refine le_antisymm _ _,
-- first direction
simp only [le_infi_iff, le_principal_iff], assume ε ε0, exact Icc_mem_nhds xt ε0,
-- second direction
rw nhds_generate_from, refine le_infi (assume s, le_infi $ assume hs, _),
simp only [mem_set_of_eq] at hs, rcases hs with ⟨xs, ⟨a, ha⟩⟩,
cases ha,
{ rw ha at *,
rcases dense xs with ⟨b, ⟨ab, bx⟩⟩,
have xb_pos : x - b > 0 := zero_lt_sub_iff_lt.2 bx,
have xxb : x - (x - b) = b := sub_sub_cancel (by rwa lt_top_iff_ne_top) (le_of_lt bx),
refine infi_le_of_le (x - b) (infi_le_of_le xb_pos _),
simp only [mem_principal_sets, le_principal_iff],
assume y, rintros ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, rw xxb at h₁, calc a < b : ab ... ≤ y : h₁ },
{ rw ha at *,
rcases dense xs with ⟨b, ⟨xb, ba⟩⟩,
have bx_pos : b - x > 0 := zero_lt_sub_iff_lt.2 xb,
have xbx : x + (b - x) = b := add_sub_cancel_of_le (le_of_lt xb),
refine infi_le_of_le (b - x) (infi_le_of_le bx_pos _),
simp only [mem_principal_sets, le_principal_iff],
assume y, rintros ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, rw xbx at h₂, calc y ≤ b : h₂ ... < a : ba },
end
/-- Characterization of neighborhoods for `ennreal` numbers. See also `tendsto_order`
for a version with strict inequalities. -/
@[nolint ge_or_gt] -- see Note [nolint_ge]
protected theorem tendsto_nhds {f : filter α} {u : α → ennreal} {a : ennreal} (ha : a ≠ ⊤) :
tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, (u x) ∈ Icc (a - ε) (a + ε) :=
by simp only [nhds_of_ne_top ha, tendsto_infi, tendsto_principal, mem_Icc]
@[nolint ge_or_gt] -- see Note [nolint_ge]
protected lemma tendsto_at_top [nonempty β] [semilattice_sup β] {f : β → ennreal} {a : ennreal}
(ha : a ≠ ⊤) : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ε>0, ∃N, ∀n≥N, (f n) ∈ Icc (a - ε) (a + ε) :=
by simp only [ennreal.tendsto_nhds ha, mem_at_top_sets, mem_set_of_eq, filter.eventually]
lemma tendsto_coe_nnreal_nhds_top {α} {l : filter α} {f : α → nnreal} (h : tendsto f l at_top) :
tendsto (λa, (f a : ennreal)) l (𝓝 ∞) :=
tendsto_nhds_top $ assume n,
have ∀ᶠ a in l, ↑(n+1) ≤ f a := h $ mem_at_top _,
mem_sets_of_superset this $ assume a (ha : ↑(n+1) ≤ f a),
begin
rw [← coe_nat],
dsimp,
exact coe_lt_coe.2 (lt_of_lt_of_le (nat.cast_lt.2 (nat.lt_succ_self _)) ha)
end
instance : topological_add_monoid ennreal :=
⟨ continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $
have hl : ∀a:ennreal, tendsto (λ (p : ennreal × ennreal), p.fst + p.snd) (𝓝 (⊤, a)) (𝓝 ⊤), from
assume a, tendsto_nhds_top $ assume n,
have set.prod {a | ↑n < a } univ ∈ 𝓝 ((⊤:ennreal), a), from
prod_mem_nhds_sets (lt_mem_nhds $ coe_nat n ▸ coe_lt_top) univ_mem_sets,
show {a : ennreal × ennreal | ↑n < a.fst + a.snd} ∈ 𝓝 (⊤, a),
begin filter_upwards [this] assume ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, lt_of_lt_of_le h₁ (le_add_right $ le_refl _) end,
begin
rintro ⟨a₁, a₂⟩,
cases a₁, { simp [continuous_at, none_eq_top, hl a₂], },
cases a₂, { simp [continuous_at, none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, nhds_swap (a₁ : ennreal) ⊤,
tendsto_map'_iff, (∘)], convert hl a₁, simp [add_comm] },
simp [continuous_at, some_eq_coe, nhds_coe_coe, tendsto_map'_iff, (∘)],
simp only [coe_add.symm, tendsto_coe, tendsto_add]
end ⟩
protected lemma tendsto_mul (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ⊤) (hb : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ ⊤) :
tendsto (λp:ennreal×ennreal, p.1 * p.2) (𝓝 (a, b)) (𝓝 (a * b)) :=
have ht : ∀b:ennreal, b ≠ 0 → tendsto (λp:ennreal×ennreal, p.1 * p.2) (𝓝 ((⊤:ennreal), b)) (𝓝 ⊤),
begin
refine assume b hb, tendsto_nhds_top $ assume n, _,
rcases dense (zero_lt_iff_ne_zero.2 hb) with ⟨ε', hε', hεb'⟩,
rcases ennreal.lt_iff_exists_coe.1 hεb' with ⟨ε, rfl, h⟩,
rcases exists_nat_gt (↑n / ε) with ⟨m, hm⟩,
have hε : ε > 0, from coe_lt_coe.1 hε',
refine mem_sets_of_superset (prod_mem_nhds_sets (lt_mem_nhds $ @coe_lt_top m) (lt_mem_nhds $ h)) _,
rintros ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
dsimp at h₁ h₂ ⊢,
calc (n:ennreal) = ↑(((n:nnreal) / ε) * ε) :
begin
simp [nnreal.div_def],
rw [mul_assoc, ← coe_mul, nnreal.inv_mul_cancel, coe_one, ← coe_nat, mul_one],
exact zero_lt_iff_ne_zero.1 hε
end
... < (↑m * ε : nnreal) : coe_lt_coe.2 $ mul_lt_mul hm (le_refl _) hε (nat.cast_nonneg _)
... ≤ a₁ * a₂ : by rw [coe_mul]; exact canonically_ordered_semiring.mul_le_mul
(le_of_lt h₁)
(le_of_lt h₂)
end,
begin
cases a, {simp [none_eq_top] at hb, simp [none_eq_top, ht b hb, top_mul, hb] },
cases b, {
simp [none_eq_top] at ha,
simp [*, nhds_swap (a : ennreal) ⊤, none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, top_mul, tendsto_map'_iff, (∘), mul_comm] },
simp [some_eq_coe, nhds_coe_coe, tendsto_map'_iff, (∘)],
simp only [coe_mul.symm, tendsto_coe, tendsto_mul]
end
protected lemma tendsto.mul {f : filter α} {ma : α → ennreal} {mb : α → ennreal} {a b : ennreal}
(hma : tendsto ma f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ⊤) (hmb : tendsto mb f (𝓝 b)) (hb : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ ⊤) :
tendsto (λa, ma a * mb a) f (𝓝 (a * b)) :=
show tendsto ((λp:ennreal×ennreal, p.1 * p.2) ∘ (λa, (ma a, mb a))) f (𝓝 (a * b)), from
tendsto.comp (ennreal.tendsto_mul ha hb) (hma.prod_mk_nhds hmb)
protected lemma tendsto.const_mul {f : filter α} {m : α → ennreal} {a b : ennreal}
(hm : tendsto m f (𝓝 b)) (hb : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ ⊤) : tendsto (λb, a * m b) f (𝓝 (a * b)) :=
by_cases
(assume : a = 0, by simp [this, tendsto_const_nhds])
(assume ha : a ≠ 0, ennreal.tendsto.mul tendsto_const_nhds (or.inl ha) hm hb)
protected lemma tendsto.mul_const {f : filter α} {m : α → ennreal} {a b : ennreal}
(hm : tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ⊤) : tendsto (λx, m x * b) f (𝓝 (a * b)) :=
by simpa only [mul_comm] using ennreal.tendsto.const_mul hm ha
protected lemma continuous_const_mul {a : ennreal} (ha : a < ⊤) : continuous ((*) a) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ λ x, tendsto.const_mul tendsto_id $ or.inr $ ne_of_lt ha
protected lemma continuous_mul_const {a : ennreal} (ha : a < ⊤) : continuous (λ x, x * a) :=
by simpa only [mul_comm] using ennreal.continuous_const_mul ha
protected lemma continuous_inv : continuous (has_inv.inv : ennreal → ennreal) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ λ a, tendsto_order.2
⟨begin
assume b hb,
simp only [@ennreal.lt_inv_iff_lt_inv b],
exact gt_mem_nhds (ennreal.lt_inv_iff_lt_inv.1 hb),
end,
begin
assume b hb,
simp only [gt_iff_lt, @ennreal.inv_lt_iff_inv_lt _ b],
exact lt_mem_nhds (ennreal.inv_lt_iff_inv_lt.1 hb)
end⟩
@[simp] protected lemma tendsto_inv_iff {f : filter α} {m : α → ennreal} {a : ennreal} :
tendsto (λ x, (m x)⁻¹) f (𝓝 a⁻¹) ↔ tendsto m f (𝓝 a) :=
⟨λ h, by simpa only [function.comp, ennreal.inv_inv]
using (ennreal.continuous_inv.tendsto a⁻¹).comp h,
(ennreal.continuous_inv.tendsto a).comp⟩
protected lemma tendsto.div {f : filter α} {ma : α → ennreal} {mb : α → ennreal} {a b : ennreal}
(hma : tendsto ma f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ 0) (hmb : tendsto mb f (𝓝 b)) (hb : b ≠ ⊤ ∨ a ≠ ⊤) :
tendsto (λa, ma a / mb a) f (𝓝 (a / b)) :=
by { apply tendsto.mul hma _ (ennreal.tendsto_inv_iff.2 hmb) _; simp [ha, hb] }
protected lemma tendsto.const_div {f : filter α} {m : α → ennreal} {a b : ennreal}
(hm : tendsto m f (𝓝 b)) (hb : b ≠ ⊤ ∨ a ≠ ⊤) : tendsto (λb, a / m b) f (𝓝 (a / b)) :=
by { apply tendsto.const_mul (ennreal.tendsto_inv_iff.2 hm), simp [hb] }
protected lemma tendsto.div_const {f : filter α} {m : α → ennreal} {a b : ennreal}
(hm : tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ 0) : tendsto (λx, m x / b) f (𝓝 (a / b)) :=
by { apply tendsto.mul_const hm, simp [ha] }
protected lemma tendsto_inv_nat_nhds_zero : tendsto (λ n : ℕ, (n : ennreal)⁻¹) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
ennreal.inv_top ▸ ennreal.tendsto_inv_iff.2 tendsto_nat_nhds_top
lemma Sup_add {s : set ennreal} (hs : s.nonempty) : Sup s + a = ⨆b∈s, b + a :=
have Sup ((λb, b + a) '' s) = Sup s + a,
from is_lub.Sup_eq (is_lub_of_is_lub_of_tendsto
(assume x _ y _ h, add_le_add' h (le_refl _))
(is_lub_Sup s)
hs
(tendsto.add (tendsto_id' inf_le_left) tendsto_const_nhds)),
by simp [Sup_image, -add_comm] at this; exact this.symm
lemma supr_add {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → ennreal} [h : nonempty ι] : supr s + a = ⨆b, s b + a :=
let ⟨x⟩ := h in
calc supr s + a = Sup (range s) + a : by simp [Sup_range]
... = (⨆b∈range s, b + a) : Sup_add ⟨s x, x, rfl⟩
... = _ : supr_range
lemma add_supr {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → ennreal} [h : nonempty ι] : a + supr s = ⨆b, a + s b :=
by rw [add_comm, supr_add]; simp [add_comm]
lemma supr_add_supr {ι : Sort*} {f g : ι → ennreal} (h : ∀i j, ∃k, f i + g j ≤ f k + g k) :
supr f + supr g = (⨆ a, f a + g a) :=
begin
by_cases hι : nonempty ι,
{ letI := hι,
refine le_antisymm _ (supr_le $ λ a, add_le_add' (le_supr _ _) (le_supr _ _)),
simpa [add_supr, supr_add] using
λ i j:ι, show f i + g j ≤ ⨆ a, f a + g a, from
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := h i j in le_supr_of_le k hk },
{ have : ∀f:ι → ennreal, (⨆i, f i) = 0 := assume f, bot_unique (supr_le $ assume i, (hι ⟨i⟩).elim),
rw [this, this, this, zero_add] }
end
lemma supr_add_supr_of_monotone {ι : Sort*} [semilattice_sup ι]
{f g : ι → ennreal} (hf : monotone f) (hg : monotone g) :
supr f + supr g = (⨆ a, f a + g a) :=
supr_add_supr $ assume i j, ⟨i ⊔ j, add_le_add' (hf $ le_sup_left) (hg $ le_sup_right)⟩
lemma finset_sum_supr_nat {α} {ι} [semilattice_sup ι] {s : finset α} {f : α → ι → ennreal}
(hf : ∀a, monotone (f a)) :
s.sum (λa, supr (f a)) = (⨆ n, s.sum (λa, f a n)) :=
begin
refine finset.induction_on s _ _,
{ simp,
exact (bot_unique $ supr_le $ assume i, le_refl ⊥).symm },
{ assume a s has ih,
simp only [finset.sum_insert has],
rw [ih, supr_add_supr_of_monotone (hf a)],
assume i j h,
exact (finset.sum_le_sum $ assume a ha, hf a h) }
end
section priority
-- for some reason the next proof fails without changing the priority of this instance
local attribute [instance, priority 1000] classical.prop_decidable
lemma mul_Sup {s : set ennreal} {a : ennreal} : a * Sup s = ⨆i∈s, a * i :=
begin
by_cases hs : ∀x∈s, x = (0:ennreal),
{ have h₁ : Sup s = 0 := (bot_unique $ Sup_le $ assume a ha, (hs a ha).symm ▸ le_refl 0),
have h₂ : (⨆i ∈ s, a * i) = 0 :=
(bot_unique $ supr_le $ assume a, supr_le $ assume ha, by simp [hs a ha]),
rw [h₁, h₂, mul_zero] },
{ simp only [not_forall] at hs,
rcases hs with ⟨x, hx, hx0⟩,
have s₁ : Sup s ≠ 0 :=
zero_lt_iff_ne_zero.1 (lt_of_lt_of_le (zero_lt_iff_ne_zero.2 hx0) (le_Sup hx)),
have : Sup ((λb, a * b) '' s) = a * Sup s :=
is_lub.Sup_eq (is_lub_of_is_lub_of_tendsto
(assume x _ y _ h, canonically_ordered_semiring.mul_le_mul (le_refl _) h)
(is_lub_Sup _)
⟨x, hx⟩
(ennreal.tendsto.const_mul (tendsto_id' inf_le_left) (or.inl s₁))),
rw [this.symm, Sup_image] }
end
end priority
lemma mul_supr {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ennreal} {a : ennreal} : a * supr f = ⨆i, a * f i :=
by rw [← Sup_range, mul_Sup, supr_range]
lemma supr_mul {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ennreal} {a : ennreal} : supr f * a = ⨆i, f i * a :=
by rw [mul_comm, mul_supr]; congr; funext; rw [mul_comm]
protected lemma tendsto_coe_sub : ∀{b:ennreal}, tendsto (λb:ennreal, ↑r - b) (𝓝 b) (𝓝 (↑r - b)) :=
begin
refine (forall_ennreal.2 $ and.intro (assume a, _) _),
{ simp [@nhds_coe a, tendsto_map'_iff, (∘), tendsto_coe, coe_sub.symm],
exact nnreal.tendsto.sub tendsto_const_nhds tendsto_id },
simp,
exact (tendsto.congr' (mem_sets_of_superset (lt_mem_nhds $ @coe_lt_top r) $
by simp [le_of_lt] {contextual := tt})) tendsto_const_nhds
end
lemma sub_supr {ι : Sort*} [hι : nonempty ι] {b : ι → ennreal} (hr : a < ⊤) :
a - (⨆i, b i) = (⨅i, a - b i) :=
let ⟨i⟩ := hι in
let ⟨r, eq, _⟩ := lt_iff_exists_coe.mp hr in
have Inf ((λb, ↑r - b) '' range b) = ↑r - (⨆i, b i),
from is_glb.Inf_eq $ is_glb_of_is_lub_of_tendsto
(assume x _ y _, sub_le_sub (le_refl _))
is_lub_supr
⟨_, i, rfl⟩
(tendsto.comp ennreal.tendsto_coe_sub (tendsto_id' inf_le_left)),
by rw [eq, ←this]; simp [Inf_image, infi_range, -mem_range]; exact le_refl _
end topological_space
section tsum
variables {f g : α → ennreal}
@[norm_cast] protected lemma has_sum_coe {f : α → nnreal} {r : nnreal} :
has_sum (λa, (f a : ennreal)) ↑r ↔ has_sum f r :=
have (λs:finset α, s.sum (coe ∘ f)) = (coe : nnreal → ennreal) ∘ (λs:finset α, s.sum f),
from funext $ assume s, ennreal.coe_finset_sum.symm,
by unfold has_sum; rw [this, tendsto_coe]
protected lemma tsum_coe_eq {f : α → nnreal} (h : has_sum f r) : (∑'a, (f a : ennreal)) = r :=
tsum_eq_has_sum $ ennreal.has_sum_coe.2 $ h
protected lemma coe_tsum {f : α → nnreal} : summable f → ↑(tsum f) = (∑'a, (f a : ennreal))
| ⟨r, hr⟩ := by rw [tsum_eq_has_sum hr, ennreal.tsum_coe_eq hr]
protected lemma has_sum : has_sum f (⨆s:finset α, s.sum f) :=
tendsto_order.2
⟨assume a' ha',
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := lt_supr_iff.mp ha' in
mem_at_top_sets.mpr ⟨s, assume t ht, lt_of_lt_of_le hs $ finset.sum_le_sum_of_subset ht⟩,
assume a' ha',
univ_mem_sets' $ assume s,
have s.sum f ≤ ⨆(s : finset α), s.sum f,
from le_supr (λ(s : finset α), s.sum f) s,
lt_of_le_of_lt this ha'⟩
@[simp] protected lemma summable : summable f := ⟨_, ennreal.has_sum⟩
lemma tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable {f : β → nnreal} :
(∑' b, (f b:ennreal)) ≠ ∞ ↔ summable f :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, λ h, ennreal.coe_tsum h ▸ ennreal.coe_ne_top⟩,
lift (∑' b, (f b:ennreal)) to nnreal using h with a ha,
refine ⟨a, ennreal.has_sum_coe.1 _⟩,
rw ha,
exact ennreal.summable.has_sum
end
protected lemma tsum_eq_supr_sum : (∑'a, f a) = (⨆s:finset α, s.sum f) :=
tsum_eq_has_sum ennreal.has_sum
protected lemma tsum_eq_supr_sum' {ι : Type*} (s : ι → finset α) (hs : ∀ t, ∃ i, t ⊆ s i) :
(∑' a, f a) = ⨆ i, (s i).sum f :=
begin
rw [ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_sum],
symmetry,
change (⨆i:ι, (λ t : finset α, t.sum f) (s i)) = ⨆s:finset α, s.sum f,
exact (finset.sum_mono_set f).supr_comp_eq hs
end
protected lemma tsum_sigma {β : α → Type*} (f : Πa, β a → ennreal) :
(∑'p:Σa, β a, f p.1 p.2) = (∑'a b, f a b) :=
tsum_sigma (assume b, ennreal.summable) ennreal.summable
protected lemma tsum_sigma' {β : α → Type*} (f : (Σ a, β a) → ennreal) :
(∑'p:(Σa, β a), f p) = (∑'a b, f ⟨a, b⟩) :=
tsum_sigma (assume b, ennreal.summable) ennreal.summable
protected lemma tsum_prod {f : α → β → ennreal} : (∑'p:α×β, f p.1 p.2) = (∑'a, ∑'b, f a b) :=
let j : α × β → (Σa:α, β) := λp, sigma.mk p.1 p.2 in
let i : (Σa:α, β) → α × β := λp, (p.1, p.2) in
let f' : (Σa:α, β) → ennreal := λp, f p.1 p.2 in
calc (∑'p:α×β, f' (j p)) = (∑'p:Σa:α, β, f p.1 p.2) :
tsum_eq_tsum_of_iso j i (assume ⟨a, b⟩, rfl) (assume ⟨a, b⟩, rfl)
... = (∑'a, ∑'b, f a b) : ennreal.tsum_sigma f
protected lemma tsum_comm {f : α → β → ennreal} : (∑'a, ∑'b, f a b) = (∑'b, ∑'a, f a b) :=
let f' : α×β → ennreal := λp, f p.1 p.2 in
calc (∑'a, ∑'b, f a b) = (∑'p:α×β, f' p) : ennreal.tsum_prod.symm
... = (∑'p:β×α, f' (prod.swap p)) :
(tsum_eq_tsum_of_iso prod.swap (@prod.swap α β) (assume ⟨a, b⟩, rfl) (assume ⟨a, b⟩, rfl)).symm
... = (∑'b, ∑'a, f' (prod.swap (b, a))) : @ennreal.tsum_prod β α (λb a, f' (prod.swap (b, a)))
protected lemma tsum_add : (∑'a, f a + g a) = (∑'a, f a) + (∑'a, g a) :=
tsum_add ennreal.summable ennreal.summable
protected lemma tsum_le_tsum (h : ∀a, f a ≤ g a) : (∑'a, f a) ≤ (∑'a, g a) :=
tsum_le_tsum h ennreal.summable ennreal.summable
protected lemma tsum_eq_supr_nat {f : ℕ → ennreal} :
(∑'i:ℕ, f i) = (⨆i:ℕ, (finset.range i).sum f) :=
ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_sum' _ finset.exists_nat_subset_range
protected lemma le_tsum (a : α) : f a ≤ (∑'a, f a) :=
calc f a = ({a} : finset α).sum f : by simp
... ≤ (⨆s:finset α, s.sum f) : le_supr (λs:finset α, s.sum f) _
... = (∑'a, f a) : by rw [ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_sum]
protected lemma tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top : (∃ a, f a = ∞) → (∑' a, f a) = ∞
| ⟨a, ha⟩ := top_unique $ ha ▸ ennreal.le_tsum a
protected lemma ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top (h : (∑' a, f a) ≠ ∞) (a : α) : f a ≠ ∞ :=
λ ha, h $ ennreal.tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top ⟨a, ha⟩
protected lemma tsum_mul_left : (∑'i, a * f i) = a * (∑'i, f i) :=
if h : ∀i, f i = 0 then by simp [h] else
let ⟨i, (hi : f i ≠ 0)⟩ := classical.not_forall.mp h in
have sum_ne_0 : (∑'i, f i) ≠ 0, from ne_of_gt $
calc 0 < f i : lt_of_le_of_ne (zero_le _) hi.symm
... ≤ (∑'i, f i) : ennreal.le_tsum _,
have tendsto (λs:finset α, s.sum ((*) a ∘ f)) at_top (𝓝 (a * (∑'i, f i))),
by rw [← show (*) a ∘ (λs:finset α, s.sum f) = λs, s.sum ((*) a ∘ f),
from funext $ λ s, finset.mul_sum];
exact ennreal.tendsto.const_mul ennreal.summable.has_sum (or.inl sum_ne_0),
tsum_eq_has_sum this
protected lemma tsum_mul_right : (∑'i, f i * a) = (∑'i, f i) * a :=
by simp [mul_comm, ennreal.tsum_mul_left]
@[simp] lemma tsum_supr_eq {α : Type*} (a : α) {f : α → ennreal} :
(∑'b:α, ⨆ (h : a = b), f b) = f a :=
le_antisymm
(by rw [ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_sum]; exact supr_le (assume s,
calc (∑ b in s, ⨆ (h : a = b), f b) ≤ ∑ b in {a}, ⨆ (h : a = b), f b :
finset.sum_le_sum_of_ne_zero $ assume b _ hb,
suffices a = b, by simpa using this.symm,
classical.by_contradiction $ assume h,
by simpa [h] using hb
... = f a : by simp))
(calc f a ≤ (⨆ (h : a = a), f a) : le_supr (λh:a=a, f a) rfl
... ≤ (∑'b:α, ⨆ (h : a = b), f b) : ennreal.le_tsum _)
lemma has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat {f : ℕ → ennreal} (r : ennreal) :
has_sum f r ↔ tendsto (λn:ℕ, (finset.range n).sum f) at_top (𝓝 r) :=
begin
refine ⟨has_sum.tendsto_sum_nat, assume h, _⟩,
rw [← supr_eq_of_tendsto _ h, ← ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_nat],
{ exact ennreal.summable.has_sum },
{ exact assume s t hst, finset.sum_le_sum_of_subset (finset.range_subset.2 hst) }
end
end tsum
end ennreal
namespace nnreal
lemma exists_le_has_sum_of_le {f g : β → nnreal} {r : nnreal}
(hgf : ∀b, g b ≤ f b) (hfr : has_sum f r) : ∃p≤r, has_sum g p :=
have (∑'b, (g b : ennreal)) ≤ r,
begin
refine has_sum_le (assume b, _) ennreal.summable.has_sum (ennreal.has_sum_coe.2 hfr),
exact ennreal.coe_le_coe.2 (hgf _)
end,
let ⟨p, eq, hpr⟩ := ennreal.le_coe_iff.1 this in
⟨p, hpr, ennreal.has_sum_coe.1 $ eq ▸ ennreal.summable.has_sum⟩
lemma summable_of_le {f g : β → nnreal} (hgf : ∀b, g b ≤ f b) : summable f → summable g
| ⟨r, hfr⟩ := let ⟨p, _, hp⟩ := exists_le_has_sum_of_le hgf hfr in hp.summable
lemma has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat {f : ℕ → nnreal} (r : nnreal) :
has_sum f r ↔ tendsto (λn:ℕ, (finset.range n).sum f) at_top (𝓝 r) :=
begin
rw [← ennreal.has_sum_coe, ennreal.has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat],
simp only [ennreal.coe_finset_sum.symm],
exact ennreal.tendsto_coe
end
lemma tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_inj {β : Type*} {f : α → nnreal} (hf : summable f)
{i : β → α} (hi : function.injective i) : tsum (f ∘ i) ≤ tsum f :=
tsum_le_tsum_of_inj i hi (λ c hc, zero_le _) (λ b, le_refl _) (summable_comp_injective hf hi) hf
end nnreal
lemma tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_inj {β : Type*} {f : α → ℝ} (hf : summable f) (hn : ∀ a, 0 ≤ f a)
{i : β → α} (hi : function.injective i) : tsum (f ∘ i) ≤ tsum f :=
begin
let g : α → nnreal := λ a, ⟨f a, hn a⟩,
have hg : summable g, by rwa ← nnreal.summable_coe,
convert nnreal.coe_le_coe.2 (nnreal.tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_inj hg hi);
{ rw nnreal.coe_tsum, congr }
end
lemma summable_of_nonneg_of_le {f g : β → ℝ}
(hg : ∀b, 0 ≤ g b) (hgf : ∀b, g b ≤ f b) (hf : summable f) : summable g :=
let f' (b : β) : nnreal := ⟨f b, le_trans (hg b) (hgf b)⟩ in
let g' (b : β) : nnreal := ⟨g b, hg b⟩ in
have summable f', from nnreal.summable_coe.1 hf,
have summable g', from
nnreal.summable_of_le (assume b, (@nnreal.coe_le_coe (g' b) (f' b)).2 $ hgf b) this,
show summable (λb, g' b : β → ℝ), from nnreal.summable_coe.2 this
lemma has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_nonneg {f : ℕ → ℝ} (hf : ∀i, 0 ≤ f i) (r : ℝ) :
has_sum f r ↔ tendsto (λn:ℕ, (finset.range n).sum f) at_top (𝓝 r) :=
⟨has_sum.tendsto_sum_nat,
assume hfr,
have 0 ≤ r := ge_of_tendsto at_top_ne_bot hfr $ univ_mem_sets' $ assume i,
show 0 ≤ (finset.range i).sum f, from finset.sum_nonneg $ assume i _, hf i,
let f' (n : ℕ) : nnreal := ⟨f n, hf n⟩, r' : nnreal := ⟨r, this⟩ in
have f_eq : f = (λi:ℕ, (f' i : ℝ)) := rfl,
have r_eq : r = r' := rfl,
begin
rw [f_eq, r_eq, nnreal.has_sum_coe, nnreal.has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat, ← nnreal.tendsto_coe],
simp only [nnreal.coe_sum],
exact hfr
end⟩
lemma infi_real_pos_eq_infi_nnreal_pos {α : Type*} [complete_lattice α] {f : ℝ → α} :
(⨅(n:ℝ) (h : 0 < n), f n) = (⨅(n:nnreal) (h : 0 < n), f n) :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume n, le_infi $ assume hn, infi_le_of_le n $ infi_le _ (nnreal.coe_pos.2 hn))
(le_infi $ assume r, le_infi $ assume hr, infi_le_of_le ⟨r, le_of_lt hr⟩ $ infi_le _ hr)
section
variables [emetric_space β]
open ennreal filter emetric
/-- In an emetric ball, the distance between points is everywhere finite -/
lemma edist_ne_top_of_mem_ball {a : β} {r : ennreal} (x y : ball a r) : edist x.1 y.1 ≠ ⊤ :=
lt_top_iff_ne_top.1 $
calc edist x y ≤ edist a x + edist a y : edist_triangle_left x.1 y.1 a
... < r + r : by rw [edist_comm a x, edist_comm a y]; exact add_lt_add x.2 y.2
... ≤ ⊤ : le_top
/-- Each ball in an extended metric space gives us a metric space, as the edist
is everywhere finite. -/
def metric_space_emetric_ball (a : β) (r : ennreal) : metric_space (ball a r) :=
emetric_space.to_metric_space edist_ne_top_of_mem_ball
local attribute [instance] metric_space_emetric_ball
lemma nhds_eq_nhds_emetric_ball (a x : β) (r : ennreal) (h : x ∈ ball a r) :
𝓝 x = map (coe : ball a r → β) (𝓝 ⟨x, h⟩) :=
(map_nhds_subtype_val_eq _ $ mem_nhds_sets emetric.is_open_ball h).symm
end
section
variable [emetric_space α]
open emetric
lemma tendsto_iff_edist_tendsto_0 {l : filter β} {f : β → α} {y : α} :
tendsto f l (𝓝 y) ↔ tendsto (λ x, edist (f x) y) l (𝓝 0) :=
by simp only [emetric.nhds_basis_eball.tendsto_right_iff, emetric.mem_ball,
@tendsto_order ennreal β _ _, forall_prop_of_false ennreal.not_lt_zero, forall_const, true_and]
/-- Yet another metric characterization of Cauchy sequences on integers. This one is often the
most efficient. -/
lemma emetric.cauchy_seq_iff_le_tendsto_0 [nonempty β] [semilattice_sup β] {s : β → α} :
cauchy_seq s ↔ (∃ (b: β → ennreal), (∀ n m N : β, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → edist (s n) (s m) ≤ b N)
∧ (tendsto b at_top (𝓝 0))) :=
⟨begin
assume hs,
rw emetric.cauchy_seq_iff at hs,
/- `s` is Cauchy sequence. The sequence `b` will be constructed by taking
the supremum of the distances between `s n` and `s m` for `n m ≥ N`-/
let b := λN, Sup ((λ(p : β × β), edist (s p.1) (s p.2))''{p | p.1 ≥ N ∧ p.2 ≥ N}),
--Prove that it bounds the distances of points in the Cauchy sequence
have C : ∀ n m N, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → edist (s n) (s m) ≤ b N,
{ refine λm n N hm hn, le_Sup _,
use (prod.mk m n),
simp only [and_true, eq_self_iff_true, set.mem_set_of_eq],
exact ⟨hm, hn⟩ },
--Prove that it tends to `0`, by using the Cauchy property of `s`
have D : tendsto b at_top (𝓝 0),
{ refine tendsto_order.2 ⟨λa ha, absurd ha (ennreal.not_lt_zero), λε εpos, _⟩,
rcases dense εpos with ⟨δ, δpos, δlt⟩,
rcases hs δ δpos with ⟨N, hN⟩,
refine filter.mem_at_top_sets.2 ⟨N, λn hn, _⟩,
have : b n ≤ δ := Sup_le begin
simp only [and_imp, set.mem_image, set.mem_set_of_eq, exists_imp_distrib, prod.exists],
intros d p q hp hq hd,
rw ← hd,
exact le_of_lt (hN p q (le_trans hn hp) (le_trans hn hq))
end,
simpa using lt_of_le_of_lt this δlt },
-- Conclude
exact ⟨b, ⟨C, D⟩⟩
end,
begin
rintros ⟨b, ⟨b_bound, b_lim⟩⟩,
/-b : ℕ → ℝ, b_bound : ∀ (n m N : ℕ), N ≤ n → N ≤ m → edist (s n) (s m) ≤ b N,
b_lim : tendsto b at_top (𝓝 0)-/
refine emetric.cauchy_seq_iff.2 (λε εpos, _),
have : ∀ᶠ n in at_top, b n < ε := (tendsto_order.1 b_lim ).2 _ εpos,
rcases filter.mem_at_top_sets.1 this with ⟨N, hN⟩,
exact ⟨N, λm n hm hn, calc
edist (s m) (s n) ≤ b N : b_bound m n N hm hn
... < ε : (hN _ (le_refl N)) ⟩
end⟩
lemma continuous_of_le_add_edist {f : α → ennreal} (C : ennreal)
(hC : C ≠ ⊤) (h : ∀x y, f x ≤ f y + C * edist x y) : continuous f :=
begin
refine continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 (λx, tendsto_order.2 ⟨_, _⟩),
show ∀e, e < f x → ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, e < f y,
{ assume e he,
let ε := min (f x - e) 1,
have : ε < ⊤ := lt_of_le_of_lt (min_le_right _ _) (by simp [lt_top_iff_ne_top]),
have : 0 < ε := by simp [ε, hC, he, ennreal.zero_lt_one],
have : 0 < C⁻¹ * (ε/2) := bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.2 (by simp [hC, (ne_of_lt this).symm, ennreal.mul_eq_zero]),
have I : C * (C⁻¹ * (ε/2)) < ε,
{ by_cases C_zero : C = 0,
{ simp [C_zero, ‹0 < ε›] },
{ calc C * (C⁻¹ * (ε/2)) = (C * C⁻¹) * (ε/2) : by simp [mul_assoc]
... = ε/2 : by simp [ennreal.mul_inv_cancel C_zero hC]
... < ε : ennreal.half_lt_self (bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.1 ‹0 < ε›) (lt_top_iff_ne_top.1 ‹ε < ⊤›) }},
have : ball x (C⁻¹ * (ε/2)) ⊆ {y : α | e < f y},
{ rintros y hy,
by_cases htop : f y = ⊤,
{ simp [htop, lt_top_iff_ne_top, ne_top_of_lt he] },
{ simp at hy,
have : e + ε < f y + ε := calc
e + ε ≤ e + (f x - e) : add_le_add_left' (min_le_left _ _)
... = f x : by simp [le_of_lt he]
... ≤ f y + C * edist x y : h x y
... = f y + C * edist y x : by simp [edist_comm]
... ≤ f y + C * (C⁻¹ * (ε/2)) :
add_le_add_left' $ canonically_ordered_semiring.mul_le_mul (le_refl _) (le_of_lt hy)
... < f y + ε : (ennreal.add_lt_add_iff_left (lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 htop)).2 I,
show e < f y, from
(ennreal.add_lt_add_iff_right ‹ε < ⊤›).1 this }},
apply filter.mem_sets_of_superset (ball_mem_nhds _ (‹0 < C⁻¹ * (ε/2)›)) this },
show ∀e, f x < e → ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, f y < e,
{ assume e he,
let ε := min (e - f x) 1,
have : ε < ⊤ := lt_of_le_of_lt (min_le_right _ _) (by simp [lt_top_iff_ne_top]),
have : 0 < ε := by simp [ε, he, ennreal.zero_lt_one],
have : 0 < C⁻¹ * (ε/2) := bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.2 (by simp [hC, (ne_of_lt this).symm, ennreal.mul_eq_zero]),
have I : C * (C⁻¹ * (ε/2)) < ε,
{ by_cases C_zero : C = 0,
simp [C_zero, ‹0 < ε›],
calc C * (C⁻¹ * (ε/2)) = (C * C⁻¹) * (ε/2) : by simp [mul_assoc]
... = ε/2 : by simp [ennreal.mul_inv_cancel C_zero hC]
... < ε : ennreal.half_lt_self (bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.1 ‹0 < ε›) (lt_top_iff_ne_top.1 ‹ε < ⊤›) },
have : ball x (C⁻¹ * (ε/2)) ⊆ {y : α | f y < e},
{ rintros y hy,
have htop : f x ≠ ⊤ := ne_top_of_lt he,
show f y < e, from calc
f y ≤ f x + C * edist y x : h y x
... ≤ f x + C * (C⁻¹ * (ε/2)) :
add_le_add_left' $ canonically_ordered_semiring.mul_le_mul (le_refl _) (le_of_lt hy)
... < f x + ε : (ennreal.add_lt_add_iff_left (lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 htop)).2 I
... ≤ f x + (e - f x) : add_le_add_left' (min_le_left _ _)
... = e : by simp [le_of_lt he] },
apply filter.mem_sets_of_superset (ball_mem_nhds _ (‹0 < C⁻¹ * (ε/2)›)) this },
end
theorem continuous_edist : continuous (λp:α×α, edist p.1 p.2) :=
begin
apply continuous_of_le_add_edist 2 (by simp),
rintros ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨x', y'⟩,
calc edist x y ≤ edist x x' + edist x' y' + edist y' y : edist_triangle4 _ _ _ _
... = edist x' y' + (edist x x' + edist y y') : by simp [edist_comm]; cc
... ≤ edist x' y' + (edist (x, y) (x', y') + edist (x, y) (x', y')) :
add_le_add_left' (add_le_add' (by simp [edist, le_refl]) (by simp [edist, le_refl]))
... = edist x' y' + 2 * edist (x, y) (x', y') : by rw [← mul_two, mul_comm]
end
theorem continuous.edist [topological_space β] {f g : β → α}
(hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g) : continuous (λb, edist (f b) (g b)) :=
continuous_edist.comp (hf.prod_mk hg)
theorem filter.tendsto.edist {f g : β → α} {x : filter β} {a b : α}
(hf : tendsto f x (𝓝 a)) (hg : tendsto g x (𝓝 b)) :
tendsto (λx, edist (f x) (g x)) x (𝓝 (edist a b)) :=
(continuous_edist.tendsto (a, b)).comp (hf.prod_mk_nhds hg)
lemma cauchy_seq_of_edist_le_of_tsum_ne_top {f : ℕ → α} (d : ℕ → ennreal)
(hf : ∀ n, edist (f n) (f n.succ) ≤ d n) (hd : tsum d ≠ ∞) :
cauchy_seq f :=
begin
lift d to (ℕ → nnreal) using (λ i, ennreal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top hd i),
rw ennreal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable at hd,
exact cauchy_seq_of_edist_le_of_summable d hf hd
end
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded above by a function `d : ℕ → ennreal`,
then the distance from `f n` to the limit is bounded by `∑'_{k=n}^∞ d k`. -/
lemma edist_le_tsum_of_edist_le_of_tendsto {f : ℕ → α} (d : ℕ → ennreal)
(hf : ∀ n, edist (f n) (f n.succ) ≤ d n)
{a : α} (ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a)) (n : ℕ) :
edist (f n) a ≤ ∑' m, d (n + m) :=
begin
refine le_of_tendsto at_top_ne_bot (tendsto_const_nhds.edist ha)
(mem_at_top_sets.2 ⟨n, λ m hnm, _⟩),
refine le_trans (edist_le_Ico_sum_of_edist_le hnm (λ k _ _, hf k)) _,
rw [finset.sum_Ico_eq_sum_range],
exact sum_le_tsum _ (λ _ _, zero_le _) ennreal.summable
end
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded above by a function `d : ℕ → ennreal`,
then the distance from `f 0` to the limit is bounded by `∑'_{k=0}^∞ d k`. -/
lemma edist_le_tsum_of_edist_le_of_tendsto₀ {f : ℕ → α} (d : ℕ → ennreal)
(hf : ∀ n, edist (f n) (f n.succ) ≤ d n)
{a : α} (ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a)) :
edist (f 0) a ≤ ∑' m, d m :=
by simpa using edist_le_tsum_of_edist_le_of_tendsto d hf ha 0
end --section
|
755f9b6507375e82c384c3b8ae13f943ffe0b377 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/playground/ref2.lean | cfee291ac82833decb23fdc87cbc112c8e1e32da | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 278 | lean | def initX : IO (IO.Ref Nat) :=
IO.mkRef 0
@[init initX] constant x : IO.Ref Nat := default _
def inc : IO Unit :=
do v ← x.get,
x.set (v+1),
IO.println (">> " ++ toString v)
def main (xs : List String) : IO Unit :=
do let n := xs.head.toNat,
n.mrepeat (λ _, inc)
|
dc42ff7d8d15a312858c24caf503684dfb7fd21a | 947fa6c38e48771ae886239b4edce6db6e18d0fb | /src/topology/sheaves/sheaf_condition/opens_le_cover.lean | 081f85a57a0bd29ac6b2c0d1349856933f5acaef | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ramonfmir/mathlib | c5dc8b33155473fab97c38bd3aa6723dc289beaa | 14c52e990c17f5a00c0cc9e09847af16fabbed25 | refs/heads/master | 1,661,979,343,526 | 1,660,830,384,000 | 1,660,830,384,000 | 182,072,989 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,555,585,876,000 | 1,555,585,876,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 13,493 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import topology.sheaves.presheaf
import category_theory.limits.final
import topology.sheaves.sheaf_condition.pairwise_intersections
/-!
# Another version of the sheaf condition.
Given a family of open sets `U : ι → opens X` we can form the subcategory
`{ V : opens X // ∃ i, V ≤ U i }`, which has `supr U` as a cocone.
The sheaf condition on a presheaf `F` is equivalent to
`F` sending the opposite of this cocone to a limit cone in `C`, for every `U`.
This condition is particularly nice when checking the sheaf condition
because we don't need to do any case bashing
(depending on whether we're looking at single or double intersections,
or equivalently whether we're looking at the first or second object in an equalizer diagram).
## References
* This is the definition Lurie uses in [Spectral Algebraic Geometry][LurieSAG].
-/
universes v u
noncomputable theory
open category_theory
open category_theory.limits
open topological_space
open opposite
open topological_space.opens
namespace Top
variables {C : Type u} [category.{v} C]
variables {X : Top.{v}} (F : presheaf C X) {ι : Type v} (U : ι → opens X)
namespace presheaf
namespace sheaf_condition
/--
The category of open sets contained in some element of the cover.
-/
@[derive category]
def opens_le_cover : Type v := full_subcategory (λ (V : opens X), ∃ i, V ≤ U i)
instance [inhabited ι] : inhabited (opens_le_cover U) :=
⟨⟨⊥, default, bot_le⟩⟩
namespace opens_le_cover
variables {U}
/--
An arbitrarily chosen index such that `V ≤ U i`.
-/
def index (V : opens_le_cover U) : ι := V.property.some
/--
The morphism from `V` to `U i` for some `i`.
-/
def hom_to_index (V : opens_le_cover U) : V.obj ⟶ U (index V) :=
(V.property.some_spec).hom
end opens_le_cover
/--
`supr U` as a cocone over the opens sets contained in some element of the cover.
(In fact this is a colimit cocone.)
-/
def opens_le_cover_cocone : cocone (full_subcategory_inclusion _ : opens_le_cover U ⥤ opens X) :=
{ X := supr U,
ι := { app := λ V : opens_le_cover U, V.hom_to_index ≫ opens.le_supr U _, } }
end sheaf_condition
open sheaf_condition
/--
An equivalent formulation of the sheaf condition
(which we prove equivalent to the usual one below as
`is_sheaf_iff_is_sheaf_opens_le_cover`).
A presheaf is a sheaf if `F` sends the cone `(opens_le_cover_cocone U).op` to a limit cone.
(Recall `opens_le_cover_cocone U`, has cone point `supr U`,
mapping down to any `V` which is contained in some `U i`.)
-/
def is_sheaf_opens_le_cover : Prop :=
∀ ⦃ι : Type v⦄ (U : ι → opens X), nonempty (is_limit (F.map_cone (opens_le_cover_cocone U).op))
namespace sheaf_condition
open category_theory.pairwise
/--
Implementation detail:
the object level of `pairwise_to_opens_le_cover : pairwise ι ⥤ opens_le_cover U`
-/
@[simp]
def pairwise_to_opens_le_cover_obj : pairwise ι → opens_le_cover U
| (single i) := ⟨U i, ⟨i, le_rfl⟩⟩
| (pair i j) := ⟨U i ⊓ U j, ⟨i, inf_le_left⟩⟩
open category_theory.pairwise.hom
/--
Implementation detail:
the morphism level of `pairwise_to_opens_le_cover : pairwise ι ⥤ opens_le_cover U`
-/
def pairwise_to_opens_le_cover_map :
Π {V W : pairwise ι},
(V ⟶ W) → (pairwise_to_opens_le_cover_obj U V ⟶ pairwise_to_opens_le_cover_obj U W)
| _ _ (id_single i) := 𝟙 _
| _ _ (id_pair i j) := 𝟙 _
| _ _ (left i j) := hom_of_le inf_le_left
| _ _ (right i j) := hom_of_le inf_le_right
/--
The category of single and double intersections of the `U i` maps into the category
of open sets below some `U i`.
-/
@[simps]
def pairwise_to_opens_le_cover : pairwise ι ⥤ opens_le_cover U :=
{ obj := pairwise_to_opens_le_cover_obj U,
map := λ V W i, pairwise_to_opens_le_cover_map U i, }
instance (V : opens_le_cover U) :
nonempty (structured_arrow V (pairwise_to_opens_le_cover U)) :=
⟨{ right := single (V.index), hom := V.hom_to_index }⟩
/--
The diagram consisting of the `U i` and `U i ⊓ U j` is cofinal in the diagram
of all opens contained in some `U i`.
-/
-- This is a case bash: for each pair of types of objects in `pairwise ι`,
-- we have to explicitly construct a zigzag.
instance : functor.final (pairwise_to_opens_le_cover U) :=
⟨λ V, is_connected_of_zigzag $ λ A B, begin
rcases A with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, ⟨i⟩|⟨i,j⟩, a⟩;
rcases B with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, ⟨i'⟩|⟨i',j'⟩, b⟩;
dsimp at *,
{ refine ⟨[
{ left := ⟨⟨⟩⟩, right := pair i i',
hom := (le_inf a.le b.le).hom, }, _], _, rfl⟩,
exact
list.chain.cons (or.inr ⟨{ left := 𝟙 _, right := left i i', }⟩)
(list.chain.cons (or.inl ⟨{ left := 𝟙 _, right := right i i', }⟩) list.chain.nil) },
{ refine ⟨[
{ left := ⟨⟨⟩⟩, right := pair i' i,
hom := (le_inf (b.le.trans inf_le_left) a.le).hom, },
{ left := ⟨⟨⟩⟩, right := single i',
hom := (b.le.trans inf_le_left).hom, }, _], _, rfl⟩,
exact
list.chain.cons (or.inr ⟨{ left := 𝟙 _, right := right i' i, }⟩)
(list.chain.cons (or.inl ⟨{ left := 𝟙 _, right := left i' i, }⟩)
(list.chain.cons (or.inr ⟨{ left := 𝟙 _, right := left i' j', }⟩) list.chain.nil)) },
{ refine ⟨[
{ left := ⟨⟨⟩⟩, right := single i,
hom := (a.le.trans inf_le_left).hom, },
{ left := ⟨⟨⟩⟩, right := pair i i', hom :=
(le_inf (a.le.trans inf_le_left) b.le).hom, }, _], _, rfl⟩,
exact
list.chain.cons (or.inl ⟨{ left := 𝟙 _, right := left i j, }⟩)
(list.chain.cons (or.inr ⟨{ left := 𝟙 _, right := left i i', }⟩)
(list.chain.cons (or.inl ⟨{ left := 𝟙 _, right := right i i', }⟩) list.chain.nil)) },
{ refine ⟨[
{ left := ⟨⟨⟩⟩, right := single i,
hom := (a.le.trans inf_le_left).hom, },
{ left := ⟨⟨⟩⟩, right := pair i i',
hom := (le_inf (a.le.trans inf_le_left) (b.le.trans inf_le_left)).hom, },
{ left := ⟨⟨⟩⟩, right := single i',
hom := (b.le.trans inf_le_left).hom, }, _], _, rfl⟩,
exact
list.chain.cons (or.inl ⟨{ left := 𝟙 _, right := left i j, }⟩)
(list.chain.cons (or.inr ⟨{ left := 𝟙 _, right := left i i', }⟩)
(list.chain.cons (or.inl ⟨{ left := 𝟙 _, right := right i i', }⟩)
(list.chain.cons (or.inr ⟨{ left := 𝟙 _, right := left i' j', }⟩) list.chain.nil))), },
end⟩
/--
The diagram in `opens X` indexed by pairwise intersections from `U` is isomorphic
(in fact, equal) to the diagram factored through `opens_le_cover U`.
-/
def pairwise_diagram_iso :
pairwise.diagram U ≅
pairwise_to_opens_le_cover U ⋙ full_subcategory_inclusion _ :=
{ hom := { app := begin rintro (i|⟨i,j⟩); exact 𝟙 _, end, },
inv := { app := begin rintro (i|⟨i,j⟩); exact 𝟙 _, end, }, }
/--
The cocone `pairwise.cocone U` with cocone point `supr U` over `pairwise.diagram U` is isomorphic
to the cocone `opens_le_cover_cocone U` (with the same cocone point)
after appropriate whiskering and postcomposition.
-/
def pairwise_cocone_iso :
(pairwise.cocone U).op ≅
(cones.postcompose_equivalence (nat_iso.op (pairwise_diagram_iso U : _) : _)).functor.obj
((opens_le_cover_cocone U).op.whisker (pairwise_to_opens_le_cover U).op) :=
cones.ext (iso.refl _) (by tidy)
end sheaf_condition
open sheaf_condition
/--
The sheaf condition
in terms of a limit diagram over all `{ V : opens X // ∃ i, V ≤ U i }`
is equivalent to the reformulation
in terms of a limit diagram over `U i` and `U i ⊓ U j`.
-/
lemma is_sheaf_opens_le_cover_iff_is_sheaf_pairwise_intersections (F : presheaf C X) :
F.is_sheaf_opens_le_cover ↔ F.is_sheaf_pairwise_intersections :=
forall₂_congr $ λ ι U, equiv.nonempty_congr $
calc is_limit (F.map_cone (opens_le_cover_cocone U).op)
≃ is_limit ((F.map_cone (opens_le_cover_cocone U).op).whisker (pairwise_to_opens_le_cover U).op)
: (functor.initial.is_limit_whisker_equiv (pairwise_to_opens_le_cover U).op _).symm
... ≃ is_limit (F.map_cone ((opens_le_cover_cocone U).op.whisker (pairwise_to_opens_le_cover U).op))
: is_limit.equiv_iso_limit F.map_cone_whisker.symm
... ≃ is_limit ((cones.postcompose_equivalence _).functor.obj
(F.map_cone ((opens_le_cover_cocone U).op.whisker (pairwise_to_opens_le_cover U).op)))
: (is_limit.postcompose_hom_equiv _ _).symm
... ≃ is_limit (F.map_cone ((cones.postcompose_equivalence _).functor.obj
((opens_le_cover_cocone U).op.whisker (pairwise_to_opens_le_cover U).op)))
: is_limit.equiv_iso_limit (functor.map_cone_postcompose_equivalence_functor _).symm
... ≃ is_limit (F.map_cone (pairwise.cocone U).op)
: is_limit.equiv_iso_limit
((cones.functoriality _ _).map_iso (pairwise_cocone_iso U : _).symm)
section
variables {Y : opens X} (hY : Y = supr U)
/-- Given a family of opens `U` and an open `Y` equal to the union of opens in `U`, we may
take the presieve on `Y` associated to `U` and the sieve generated by it, and form the
full subcategory (subposet) of opens contained in `Y` (`over Y`) consisting of arrows
in the sieve. This full subcategory is equivalent to `opens_le_cover U`, the (poset)
category of opens contained in some `U i`. -/
@[simps] def generate_equivalence_opens_le :
full_subcategory (λ (f : over Y), (sieve.generate (presieve_of_covering_aux U Y)).arrows f.hom) ≌
opens_le_cover U :=
{ functor :=
{ obj := λ f, ⟨f.1.left, let ⟨_,h,_,⟨i,hY⟩,_⟩ := f.2 in ⟨i, hY ▸ h.le⟩⟩,
map := λ _ _ g, g.left },
inverse :=
{ obj := λ V, ⟨over.mk (hY.substr (let ⟨i,h⟩ := V.2 in h.trans (le_supr U i))).hom,
let ⟨i,h⟩ := V.2 in ⟨U i, h.hom, (hY.substr (le_supr U i)).hom, ⟨i, rfl⟩, rfl⟩⟩,
map := λ _ _ g, over.hom_mk g },
unit_iso := eq_to_iso $ category_theory.functor.ext
(by {rintro ⟨⟨_,_⟩,_⟩, dsimp, congr; ext}) (by {intros, ext}),
counit_iso := eq_to_iso $ category_theory.functor.hext
(by {intro, ext, refl}) (by {intros, refl}) }
/-- Given a family of opens `opens_le_cover_cocone U` is essentially the natural cocone
associated to the sieve generated by the presieve associated to `U` with indexing
category changed using the above equivalence. -/
@[simps] def whisker_iso_map_generate_cocone :
cone.whisker (generate_equivalence_opens_le U hY).op.functor
(F.map_cone (opens_le_cover_cocone U).op) ≅
F.map_cone (sieve.generate (presieve_of_covering_aux U Y)).arrows.cocone.op :=
{ hom :=
{ hom := F.map (eq_to_hom (congr_arg op hY.symm)),
w' := λ j, by { erw ← F.map_comp, congr } },
inv :=
{ hom := F.map (eq_to_hom (congr_arg op hY)),
w' := λ j, by { erw ← F.map_comp, congr } },
hom_inv_id' := by { ext, simp [eq_to_hom_map], },
inv_hom_id' := by { ext, simp [eq_to_hom_map], } }
/-- Given a presheaf `F` on the topological space `X` and a family of opens `U` of `X`,
the natural cone associated to `F` and `U` used in the definition of
`F.is_sheaf_opens_le_cover` is a limit cone iff the natural cone associated to `F`
and the sieve generated by the presieve associated to `U` is a limit cone. -/
def is_limit_opens_le_equiv_generate₁ :
is_limit (F.map_cone (opens_le_cover_cocone U).op) ≃
is_limit (F.map_cone (sieve.generate (presieve_of_covering_aux U Y)).arrows.cocone.op) :=
(is_limit.whisker_equivalence_equiv (generate_equivalence_opens_le U hY).op).trans
(is_limit.equiv_iso_limit (whisker_iso_map_generate_cocone F U hY))
/-- Given a presheaf `F` on the topological space `X` and a presieve `R` whose generated sieve
is covering for the associated Grothendieck topology (equivalently, the presieve is covering
for the associated pretopology), the natural cone associated to `F` and the family of opens
associated to `R` is a limit cone iff the natural cone associated to `F` and the generated
sieve is a limit cone.
Since only the existence of a 1-1 correspondence will be used, the exact definition does
not matter, so tactics are used liberally. -/
def is_limit_opens_le_equiv_generate₂ (R : presieve Y)
(hR : sieve.generate R ∈ opens.grothendieck_topology X Y) :
is_limit (F.map_cone (opens_le_cover_cocone (covering_of_presieve Y R)).op) ≃
is_limit (F.map_cone (sieve.generate R).arrows.cocone.op) :=
begin
convert is_limit_opens_le_equiv_generate₁ F (covering_of_presieve Y R)
(covering_of_presieve.supr_eq_of_mem_grothendieck Y R hR).symm using 2;
rw covering_presieve_eq_self R,
end
/-- A presheaf `(opens X)ᵒᵖ ⥤ C` on a topological space `X` is a sheaf on the site `opens X` iff
it satisfies the `is_sheaf_opens_le_cover` sheaf condition. The latter is not the
official definition of sheaves on spaces, but has the advantage that it does not
require `has_products C`. -/
lemma is_sheaf_iff_is_sheaf_opens_le_cover :
F.is_sheaf ↔ F.is_sheaf_opens_le_cover :=
begin
refine (presheaf.is_sheaf_iff_is_limit _ _).trans _,
split,
{ intros h ι U, rw (is_limit_opens_le_equiv_generate₁ F U rfl).nonempty_congr,
apply h, apply presieve_of_covering.mem_grothendieck_topology },
{ intros h Y S, rw ← sieve.generate_sieve S, intro hS,
rw ← (is_limit_opens_le_equiv_generate₂ F S hS).nonempty_congr, apply h },
end
end
end presheaf
end Top
|
ba98f49ff75f86986a3830d19916239b38c3d53e | 9dc8cecdf3c4634764a18254e94d43da07142918 | /src/number_theory/wilson.lean | 3a6463cd1b53d9e62449b53a7bd50ec2de8627d9 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcommelin/mathlib | d8456447c36c176e14d96d9e76f39841f69d2d9b | ee8279351a2e434c2852345c51b728d22af5a156 | refs/heads/master | 1,664,782,136,488 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 132,563,656 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,663,599,929,000 | 1,525,760,539,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,675 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 John Nicol. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: John Nicol
-/
import number_theory.legendre_symbol.gauss_eisenstein_lemmas
/-!
# Wilson's theorem.
This file contains a proof of Wilson's theorem.
The heavy lifting is mostly done by the previous `wilsons_lemma`,
but here we also prove the other logical direction.
This could be generalized to similar results about finite abelian groups.
## References
* [Wilson's Theorem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilson%27s_theorem)
## TODO
* Move `wilsons_lemma` into this file, and give it a descriptive name.
-/
open_locale nat
namespace nat
variable {n : ℕ}
/-- For `n ≠ 1`, `(n-1)!` is congruent to `-1` modulo `n` only if n is prime. --/
lemma prime_of_fac_equiv_neg_one
(h : ((n - 1)! : zmod n) = -1) (h1 : n ≠ 1) : prime n :=
begin
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | h0,
{ norm_num at h },
replace h1 : 1 < n := n.two_le_iff.mpr ⟨h0, h1⟩,
by_contradiction h2,
obtain ⟨m, hm1, hm2 : 1 < m, hm3⟩ := exists_dvd_of_not_prime2 h1 h2,
have hm : m ∣ (n - 1)! := nat.dvd_factorial (pos_of_gt hm2) (le_pred_of_lt hm3),
refine hm2.ne' (nat.dvd_one.mp ((nat.dvd_add_right hm).mp (hm1.trans _))),
rw [←zmod.nat_coe_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd, cast_add, cast_one, h, add_left_neg],
end
/-- **Wilson's Theorem**: For `n ≠ 1`, `(n-1)!` is congruent to `-1` modulo `n` iff n is prime. --/
theorem prime_iff_fac_equiv_neg_one (h : n ≠ 1) :
prime n ↔ ((n - 1)! : zmod n) = -1 :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h1, _, λ h2, prime_of_fac_equiv_neg_one h2 h⟩,
haveI := fact.mk h1,
exact zmod.wilsons_lemma n,
end
end nat
|
ef356173911e05dc32b8180b95f6661cf091bf97 | 6065973b1fa7bbacba932011c9e2f32bf7bdd6c1 | /src/data/fin.lean | 34c158b28928c687873b5521cb1ded55bfdafafa | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | khmacdonald/mathlib | 90a0fa2222369fa69ed2fbfb841b74d2bdfd66cb | 3669cb35c578441812ad30fd967d21a94b6f387e | refs/heads/master | 1,675,863,801,090 | 1,609,761,876,000 | 1,609,761,876,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 50,584 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Keeley Hoek
-/
import data.nat.cast
import tactic.localized
import order.rel_iso
/-!
# The finite type with `n` elements
`fin n` is the type whose elements are natural numbers smaller than `n`.
This file expands on the development in the core library.
## Main definitions
### Induction principles
* `fin_zero_elim` : Elimination principle for the empty set `fin 0`, generalizes `fin.elim0`.
* `fin.succ_rec` : Define `C n i` by induction on `i : fin n` interpreted
as `(0 : fin (n - i)).succ.succ…`. This function has two arguments: `H0 n` defines
`0`-th element `C (n+1) 0` of an `(n+1)`-tuple, and `Hs n i` defines `(i+1)`-st element
of `(n+1)`-tuple based on `n`, `i`, and `i`-th element of `n`-tuple.
* `fin.succ_rec_on` : same as `fin.succ_rec` but `i : fin n` is the first argument;
* `fin.induction` : Define `C i` by induction on `i : fin (n + 1)`, separating into the
`nat`-like base cases of `C 0` and `C (i.succ)`.
* `fin.induction_on` : same as `fin.induction` but with `i : fin (n + 1)` as the first argument.
### Casts
* `cast_lt i h` : embed `i` into a `fin` where `h` proves it belongs into;
* `cast_le h` : embed `fin n` into `fin m`, `h : n ≤ m`;
* `cast eq` : embed `fin n` into `fin m`, `eq : n = m`;
* `cast_add m` : embed `fin n` into `fin (n+m)`;
* `cast_succ` : embed `fin n` into `fin (n+1)`;
* `succ_above p` : embed `fin n` into `fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p`;
* `pred_above p i h` : embed `i : fin (n+1)` into `fin n` by ignoring `p`;
* `sub_nat i h` : subtract `m` from `i ≥ m`, generalizes `fin.pred`;
* `add_nat i h` : add `m` on `i` on the right, generalizes `fin.succ`;
* `nat_add i h` adds `n` on `i` on the left;
* `clamp n m` : `min n m` as an element of `fin (m + 1)`;
### Operation on tuples
We interpret maps `Π i : fin n, α i` as tuples `(α 0, …, α (n-1))`.
If `α i` is a constant map, then tuples are isomorphic (but not definitionally equal)
to `vector`s.
We define the following operations:
* `tail` : the tail of an `n+1` tuple, i.e., its last `n` entries;
* `cons` : adding an element at the beginning of an `n`-tuple, to get an `n+1`-tuple;
* `init` : the beginning of an `n+1` tuple, i.e., its first `n` entries;
* `snoc` : adding an element at the end of an `n`-tuple, to get an `n+1`-tuple. The name `snoc`
comes from `cons` (i.e., adding an element to the left of a tuple) read in reverse order.
* `insert_nth` : insert an element to a tuple at a given position.
* `find p` : returns the first index `n` where `p n` is satisfied, and `none` if it is never
satisfied.
### Misc definitions
* `fin.last n` : The greatest value of `fin (n+1)`.
-/
universes u v
open fin nat function
/-- Elimination principle for the empty set `fin 0`, dependent version. -/
def fin_zero_elim {α : fin 0 → Sort u} (x : fin 0) : α x := x.elim0
lemma fact.succ.pos {n} : fact (0 < succ n) := zero_lt_succ _
lemma fact.bit0.pos {n} [h : fact (0 < n)] : fact (0 < bit0 n) :=
nat.zero_lt_bit0 $ ne_of_gt h
lemma fact.bit1.pos {n} : fact (0 < bit1 n) :=
nat.zero_lt_bit1 _
lemma fact.pow.pos {p n : ℕ} [h : fact $ 0 < p] : fact (0 < p ^ n) :=
pow_pos h _
localized "attribute [instance] fact.succ.pos" in fin_fact
localized "attribute [instance] fact.bit0.pos" in fin_fact
localized "attribute [instance] fact.bit1.pos" in fin_fact
localized "attribute [instance] fact.pow.pos" in fin_fact
namespace fin
variables {n m : ℕ} {a b : fin n}
instance fin_to_nat (n : ℕ) : has_coe (fin n) nat := ⟨subtype.val⟩
lemma is_lt (i : fin n) : (i : ℕ) < n := i.2
/-- convert a `ℕ` to `fin n`, provided `n` is positive -/
def of_nat' [h : fact (0 < n)] (i : ℕ) : fin n := ⟨i%n, mod_lt _ h⟩
@[simp] protected lemma eta (a : fin n) (h : (a : ℕ) < n) : (⟨(a : ℕ), h⟩ : fin n) = a :=
by cases a; refl
@[ext]
lemma ext {a b : fin n} (h : (a : ℕ) = b) : a = b := eq_of_veq h
lemma ext_iff (a b : fin n) : a = b ↔ (a : ℕ) = b :=
iff.intro (congr_arg _) fin.eq_of_veq
lemma coe_injective {n : ℕ} : injective (coe : fin n → ℕ) := subtype.coe_injective
lemma eq_iff_veq (a b : fin n) : a = b ↔ a.1 = b.1 :=
⟨veq_of_eq, eq_of_veq⟩
lemma ne_iff_vne (a b : fin n) : a ≠ b ↔ a.1 ≠ b.1 :=
⟨vne_of_ne, ne_of_vne⟩
@[simp] lemma mk_eq_subtype_mk (a : ℕ) (h : a < n) : mk a h = ⟨a, h⟩ := rfl
protected lemma mk.inj_iff {n a b : ℕ} {ha : a < n} {hb : b < n} :
(⟨a, ha⟩ : fin n) = ⟨b, hb⟩ ↔ a = b :=
⟨subtype.mk.inj, λ h, by subst h⟩
lemma mk_val {m n : ℕ} (h : m < n) : (⟨m, h⟩ : fin n).val = m := rfl
lemma eq_mk_iff_coe_eq {k : ℕ} {hk : k < n} : a = ⟨k, hk⟩ ↔ (a : ℕ) = k :=
fin.eq_iff_veq a ⟨k, hk⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mk {m n : ℕ} (h : m < n) : ((⟨m, h⟩ : fin n) : ℕ) = m := rfl
lemma mk_coe (i : fin n) : (⟨i, i.is_lt⟩ : fin n) = i :=
fin.eta _ _
lemma coe_eq_val (a : fin n) : (a : ℕ) = a.val := rfl
@[simp] lemma val_eq_coe (a : fin n) : a.val = a := rfl
attribute [simp] val_zero
@[simp] lemma val_one {n : ℕ} : (1 : fin (n+2)).val = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma val_two {n : ℕ} : (2 : fin (n+3)).val = 2 := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_zero {n : ℕ} : ((0 : fin (n+1)) : ℕ) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_one {n : ℕ} : ((1 : fin (n+2)) : ℕ) = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_two {n : ℕ} : ((2 : fin (n+3)) : ℕ) = 2 := rfl
/-- `a < b` as natural numbers if and only if `a < b` in `fin n`. -/
@[norm_cast, simp] lemma coe_fin_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : fin n} : (a : ℕ) < (b : ℕ) ↔ a < b :=
iff.rfl
/-- `a ≤ b` as natural numbers if and only if `a ≤ b` in `fin n`. -/
@[norm_cast, simp] lemma coe_fin_le {n : ℕ} {a b : fin n} : (a : ℕ) ≤ (b : ℕ) ↔ a ≤ b :=
iff.rfl
lemma val_add {n : ℕ} : ∀ a b : fin n, (a + b).val = (a.val + b.val) % n
| ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
lemma coe_add {n : ℕ} : ∀ a b : fin n, ((a + b : fin n) : ℕ) = (a + b) % n
| ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
lemma val_mul {n : ℕ} : ∀ a b : fin n, (a * b).val = (a.val * b.val) % n
| ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
lemma coe_mul {n : ℕ} : ∀ a b : fin n, ((a * b : fin n) : ℕ) = (a * b) % n
| ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
lemma one_val {n : ℕ} : (1 : fin (n+1)).val = 1 % (n+1) := rfl
lemma coe_one' {n : ℕ} : ((1 : fin (n+1)) : ℕ) = 1 % (n+1) := rfl
@[simp] lemma val_zero' (n) : (0 : fin (n+1)).val = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_zero : (⟨0, nat.succ_pos'⟩ : fin (n + 1)) = (0 : fin _) := rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_one : (⟨1, nat.succ_lt_succ (nat.succ_pos n)⟩ : fin (n + 2)) = (1 : fin _) := rfl
section bit
@[simp] lemma mk_bit0 {m n : ℕ} (h : bit0 m < n) :
(⟨bit0 m, h⟩ : fin n) = (bit0 ⟨m, (nat.le_add_right m m).trans_lt h⟩ : fin _) :=
eq_of_veq (nat.mod_eq_of_lt h).symm
@[simp] lemma mk_bit1 {m n : ℕ} (h : bit1 m < n + 1) :
(⟨bit1 m, h⟩ : fin (n + 1)) = (bit1 ⟨m, (nat.le_add_right m m).trans_lt
((m + m).lt_succ_self.trans h)⟩ : fin _) :=
begin
ext,
simp only [bit1, bit0] at h,
simp only [bit1, bit0, coe_add, coe_one', coe_mk, ←nat.add_mod, nat.mod_eq_of_lt h],
end
end bit
@[simp]
lemma of_nat_eq_coe (n : ℕ) (a : ℕ) : (of_nat a : fin (n+1)) = a :=
begin
induction a with a ih, { refl },
ext, show (a+1) % (n+1) = subtype.val (a+1 : fin (n+1)),
{ rw [val_add, ← ih, of_nat],
exact add_mod _ _ _ }
end
/-- Converting an in-range number to `fin (n + 1)` produces a result
whose value is the original number. -/
lemma coe_val_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a : ℕ} (h : a < n + 1) :
((a : fin (n + 1)).val) = a :=
begin
rw ←of_nat_eq_coe,
exact nat.mod_eq_of_lt h
end
/-- Converting the value of a `fin (n + 1)` to `fin (n + 1)` results
in the same value. -/
lemma coe_val_eq_self {n : ℕ} (a : fin (n + 1)) : (a.val : fin (n + 1)) = a :=
begin
rw fin.eq_iff_veq,
exact coe_val_of_lt a.property
end
/-- Coercing an in-range number to `fin (n + 1)`, and converting back
to `ℕ`, results in that number. -/
lemma coe_coe_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a : ℕ} (h : a < n + 1) :
((a : fin (n + 1)) : ℕ) = a :=
coe_val_of_lt h
/-- Converting a `fin (n + 1)` to `ℕ` and back results in the same
value. -/
@[simp] lemma coe_coe_eq_self {n : ℕ} (a : fin (n + 1)) : ((a : ℕ) : fin (n + 1)) = a :=
coe_val_eq_self a
/-- Assume `k = l`. If two functions defined on `fin k` and `fin l` are equal on each element,
then they coincide (in the heq sense). -/
protected lemma heq_fun_iff {α : Type*} {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) {f : fin k → α} {g : fin l → α} :
f == g ↔ (∀ (i : fin k), f i = g ⟨(i : ℕ), h ▸ i.2⟩) :=
by { induction h, simp [heq_iff_eq, function.funext_iff] }
protected lemma heq_ext_iff {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) {i : fin k} {j : fin l} :
i == j ↔ (i : ℕ) = (j : ℕ) :=
by { induction h, simp [ext_iff] }
instance {n : ℕ} : nontrivial (fin (n + 2)) := ⟨⟨0, 1, dec_trivial⟩⟩
instance {n : ℕ} : linear_order (fin n) :=
{ le := (≤), lt := (<),
decidable_le := fin.decidable_le,
decidable_lt := fin.decidable_lt,
decidable_eq := fin.decidable_eq _,
..linear_order.lift (coe : fin n → ℕ) (@fin.eq_of_veq _) }
lemma exists_iff {p : fin n → Prop} : (∃ i, p i) ↔ ∃ i h, p ⟨i, h⟩ :=
⟨λ h, exists.elim h (λ ⟨i, hi⟩ hpi, ⟨i, hi, hpi⟩),
λ h, exists.elim h (λ i hi, ⟨⟨i, hi.fst⟩, hi.snd⟩)⟩
lemma forall_iff {p : fin n → Prop} : (∀ i, p i) ↔ ∀ i h, p ⟨i, h⟩ :=
⟨λ h i hi, h ⟨i, hi⟩, λ h ⟨i, hi⟩, h i hi⟩
lemma lt_iff_coe_lt_coe : a < b ↔ (a : ℕ) < b := iff.rfl
lemma le_iff_coe_le_coe : a ≤ b ↔ (a : ℕ) ≤ b := iff.rfl
lemma mk_lt_of_lt_coe {a : ℕ} (h : a < b) : (⟨a, h.trans b.is_lt⟩ : fin n) < b := h
lemma mk_le_of_le_coe {a : ℕ} (h : a ≤ b) : (⟨a, h.trans_lt b.is_lt⟩ : fin n) ≤ b := h
lemma zero_le (a : fin (n + 1)) : 0 ≤ a := zero_le a.1
@[simp] lemma coe_succ (j : fin n) : (j.succ : ℕ) = j + 1 :=
by cases j; simp [fin.succ]
lemma succ_pos (a : fin n) : (0 : fin (n + 1)) < a.succ := by simp [lt_iff_coe_lt_coe]
/-- The greatest value of `fin (n+1)` -/
def last (n : ℕ) : fin (n+1) := ⟨_, n.lt_succ_self⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_last (n : ℕ) : (last n : ℕ) = n := rfl
lemma last_val (n : ℕ) : (last n).val = n := rfl
theorem le_last (i : fin (n+1)) : i ≤ last n :=
le_of_lt_succ i.is_lt
instance : bounded_lattice (fin (n + 1)) :=
{ top := last n,
le_top := le_last,
bot := 0,
bot_le := zero_le,
.. fin.linear_order, .. lattice_of_linear_order }
/-- `fin.succ` as an `order_embedding` -/
def succ_embedding (n : ℕ) : fin n ↪o fin (n + 1) :=
order_embedding.of_strict_mono fin.succ $ λ ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ h, succ_lt_succ h
@[simp] lemma coe_succ_embedding : ⇑(succ_embedding n) = fin.succ := rfl
@[simp] lemma succ_le_succ_iff : a.succ ≤ b.succ ↔ a ≤ b :=
(succ_embedding n).apply_le_apply
@[simp] lemma succ_lt_succ_iff : a.succ < b.succ ↔ a < b :=
(succ_embedding n).apply_lt_apply
lemma succ_injective (n : ℕ) : injective (@fin.succ n) :=
(succ_embedding n).injective
@[simp] lemma succ_inj {a b : fin n} : a.succ = b.succ ↔ a = b :=
(succ_injective n).eq_iff
lemma succ_ne_zero {n} : ∀ k : fin n, fin.succ k ≠ 0
| ⟨k, hk⟩ heq := nat.succ_ne_zero k $ (ext_iff _ _).1 heq
@[simp] lemma succ_zero_eq_one : fin.succ (0 : fin (n + 1)) = 1 := rfl
lemma mk_succ_pos (i : ℕ) (h : i < n) : (0 : fin (n + 1)) < ⟨i.succ, add_lt_add_right h 1⟩ :=
by { rw [lt_iff_coe_lt_coe, coe_zero], exact nat.succ_pos i }
lemma one_lt_succ_succ (a : fin n) : (1 : fin (n + 2)) < a.succ.succ :=
begin
cases n,
{ exact fin_zero_elim a },
{ rw [←succ_zero_eq_one, succ_lt_succ_iff], exact succ_pos a }
end
lemma succ_succ_ne_one (a : fin n) : fin.succ (fin.succ a) ≠ 1 := ne_of_gt (one_lt_succ_succ a)
@[simp] lemma coe_pred (j : fin (n+1)) (h : j ≠ 0) : (j.pred h : ℕ) = j - 1 :=
by { cases j, refl }
@[simp] lemma succ_pred : ∀(i : fin (n+1)) (h : i ≠ 0), (i.pred h).succ = i
| ⟨0, h⟩ hi := by contradiction
| ⟨n + 1, h⟩ hi := rfl
@[simp] lemma pred_succ (i : fin n) {h : i.succ ≠ 0} : i.succ.pred h = i :=
by { cases i, refl }
@[simp] lemma pred_mk_succ (i : ℕ) (h : i < n + 1) :
fin.pred ⟨i + 1, add_lt_add_right h 1⟩ (ne_of_vne (ne_of_gt (mk_succ_pos i h))) = ⟨i, h⟩ :=
by simp only [ext_iff, coe_pred, coe_mk, nat.add_sub_cancel]
@[simp] lemma pred_le_pred_iff {n : ℕ} {a b : fin n.succ} {ha : a ≠ 0} {hb : b ≠ 0} :
a.pred ha ≤ b.pred hb ↔ a ≤ b :=
by rw [←succ_le_succ_iff, succ_pred, succ_pred]
@[simp] lemma pred_lt_pred_iff {n : ℕ} {a b : fin n.succ} {ha : a ≠ 0} {hb : b ≠ 0} :
a.pred ha < b.pred hb ↔ a < b :=
by rw [←succ_lt_succ_iff, succ_pred, succ_pred]
@[simp] lemma pred_inj :
∀ {a b : fin (n + 1)} {ha : a ≠ 0} {hb : b ≠ 0}, a.pred ha = b.pred hb ↔ a = b
| ⟨0, _⟩ b ha hb := by contradiction
| ⟨i+1, _⟩ ⟨0, _⟩ ha hb := by contradiction
| ⟨i+1, hi⟩ ⟨j+1, hj⟩ ha hb := by simp [fin.eq_iff_veq]
/-- The inclusion map `fin n → ℕ` is a relation embedding. -/
def coe_embedding (n) : (fin n) ↪o ℕ :=
⟨⟨coe, @fin.eq_of_veq _⟩, λ a b, iff.rfl⟩
/-- The ordering on `fin n` is a well order. -/
instance fin.lt.is_well_order (n) : is_well_order (fin n) (<) :=
(coe_embedding n).is_well_order
/-- `cast_lt i h` embeds `i` into a `fin` where `h` proves it belongs into. -/
def cast_lt (i : fin m) (h : i.1 < n) : fin n := ⟨i.1, h⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_cast_lt (i : fin m) (h : i.1 < n) : (cast_lt i h : ℕ) = i := rfl
/-- `cast_le h i` embeds `i` into a larger `fin` type. -/
def cast_le (h : n ≤ m) : fin n ↪o fin m :=
order_embedding.of_strict_mono (λ a, cast_lt a (lt_of_lt_of_le a.2 h)) $ λ a b h, h
@[simp] lemma coe_cast_le (h : n ≤ m) (i : fin n) : (cast_le h i : ℕ) = i := rfl
/-- `cast eq i` embeds `i` into a equal `fin` type. -/
def cast (eq : n = m) : fin n ≃o fin m :=
{ to_equiv := ⟨cast_le eq.le, cast_le eq.symm.le, λ a, eq_of_veq rfl, λ a, eq_of_veq rfl⟩,
map_rel_iff' := λ a b, iff.rfl }
@[simp] lemma symm_cast (h : n = m) : (cast h).symm = cast h.symm := rfl
lemma coe_cast (h : n = m) (i : fin n) : (cast h i : ℕ) = i := rfl
@[simp] lemma cast_trans {k : ℕ} (h : n = m) (h' : m = k) {i : fin n} :
cast h' (cast h i) = cast (eq.trans h h') i := rfl
@[simp] lemma cast_refl {i : fin n} : cast rfl i = i :=
by { ext, refl }
/-- `cast_add m i` embeds `i : fin n` in `fin (n+m)`. -/
def cast_add (m) : fin n ↪o fin (n + m) := cast_le $ le_add_right n m
@[simp] lemma coe_cast_add (m : ℕ) (i : fin n) : (cast_add m i : ℕ) = i := rfl
/-- `cast_succ i` embeds `i : fin n` in `fin (n+1)`. -/
def cast_succ : fin n ↪o fin (n + 1) := cast_add 1
@[simp] lemma coe_cast_succ (i : fin n) : (i.cast_succ : ℕ) = i := rfl
lemma cast_succ_lt_succ (i : fin n) : i.cast_succ < i.succ :=
lt_iff_coe_lt_coe.2 $ by simp only [coe_cast_succ, coe_succ, nat.lt_succ_self]
lemma succ_above_aux (p : fin (n + 1)) :
strict_mono (λ i : fin n, if i.cast_succ < p then i.cast_succ else i.succ) :=
(cast_succ : fin n ↪o _).strict_mono.ite (succ_embedding n).strict_mono
(λ i j hij hj, lt_trans ((cast_succ : fin n ↪o _).apply_lt_apply.2 hij) hj)
(λ i, (cast_succ_lt_succ i).le)
/-- `succ_above p i` embeds `fin n` into `fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p`. -/
def succ_above (p : fin (n + 1)) : fin n ↪o fin (n + 1) :=
order_embedding.of_strict_mono _ p.succ_above_aux
/-- `pred_above p i h` embeds `i : fin (n+1)` into `fin n` by ignoring `p`. -/
def pred_above (p : fin (n+1)) (i : fin (n+1)) (hi : i ≠ p) : fin n :=
if h : i < p
then i.cast_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le h $ nat.le_of_lt_succ p.2)
else i.pred $
have p < i, from lt_of_le_of_ne (le_of_not_gt h) hi.symm,
ne_of_gt (lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le p) this)
/-- `sub_nat i h` subtracts `m` from `i`, generalizes `fin.pred`. -/
def sub_nat (m) (i : fin (n + m)) (h : m ≤ (i : ℕ)) : fin n :=
⟨(i : ℕ) - m, by { rw [nat.sub_lt_right_iff_lt_add h], exact i.is_lt }⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_sub_nat (i : fin (n + m)) (h : m ≤ i) : (i.sub_nat m h : ℕ) = i - m :=
rfl
/-- `add_nat i h` adds `m` to `i`, generalizes `fin.succ`. -/
def add_nat (m) : fin n ↪o fin (n + m) :=
order_embedding.of_strict_mono (λ i, ⟨(i : ℕ) + m, add_lt_add_right i.2 _⟩) $
λ i j h, lt_iff_coe_lt_coe.2 $ add_lt_add_right h _
@[simp] lemma coe_add_nat (m : ℕ) (i : fin n) : (add_nat m i : ℕ) = i + m := rfl
/-- `nat_add i h` adds `n` to `i` "on the left". -/
def nat_add (n) {m} : fin m ↪o fin (n + m) :=
order_embedding.of_strict_mono (λ i, ⟨n + (i : ℕ), add_lt_add_left i.2 _⟩) $
λ i j h, lt_iff_coe_lt_coe.2 $ add_lt_add_left h _
@[simp] lemma coe_nat_add (n : ℕ) {m : ℕ} (i : fin m) : (nat_add n i : ℕ) = n + i := rfl
/-- If `e` is an `order_iso` between `fin n` and `fin m`, then `n = m` and `e` is the identity
map. In this lemma we state that for each `i : fin n` we have `(e i : ℕ) = (i : ℕ)`. -/
@[simp] lemma coe_order_iso_apply (e : fin n ≃o fin m) (i : fin n) : (e i : ℕ) = i :=
begin
rcases i with ⟨i, hi⟩,
rw [subtype.coe_mk],
induction i using nat.strong_induction_on with i h,
refine le_antisymm (forall_lt_iff_le.1 $ λ j hj, _) (forall_lt_iff_le.1 $ λ j hj, _),
{ have := e.symm.apply_lt_apply.2 (mk_lt_of_lt_coe hj),
rw e.symm_apply_apply at this,
convert this,
simpa using h _ this (e.symm _).is_lt },
{ rwa [← h j hj (hj.trans hi), ← lt_iff_coe_lt_coe, e.apply_lt_apply] }
end
section
variables {α : Type*} [preorder α]
open set
instance order_iso_subsingleton : subsingleton (fin n ≃o α) :=
⟨λ e e', by { ext i,
rw [← e.symm.apply_eq_iff_eq, e.symm_apply_apply, ← e'.trans_apply, ext_iff,
coe_order_iso_apply] }⟩
instance order_iso_subsingleton' : subsingleton (α ≃o fin n) :=
order_iso.symm_injective.subsingleton
instance order_iso_unique : unique (fin n ≃o fin n) := unique.mk' _
/-- Two strictly monotone functions from `fin n` are equal provided that their ranges
are equal. -/
lemma strict_mono_unique {f g : fin n → α} (hf : strict_mono f) (hg : strict_mono g)
(h : range f = range g) : f = g :=
have (hf.order_iso f).trans (order_iso.set_congr _ _ h) = hg.order_iso g,
from subsingleton.elim _ _,
congr_arg (function.comp (coe : range g → α)) (funext $ rel_iso.ext_iff.1 this)
/-- Two order embeddings of `fin n` are equal provided that their ranges are equal. -/
lemma order_embedding_eq {f g : fin n ↪o α} (h : range f = range g) : f = g :=
rel_embedding.ext $ funext_iff.1 $ strict_mono_unique f.strict_mono g.strict_mono h
end
@[simp] lemma succ_last (n : ℕ) : (last n).succ = last (n.succ) := rfl
@[simp] lemma cast_succ_cast_lt (i : fin (n + 1)) (h : (i : ℕ) < n) : cast_succ (cast_lt i h) = i :=
fin.eq_of_veq rfl
@[simp] lemma cast_lt_cast_succ {n : ℕ} (a : fin n) (h : (a : ℕ) < n) :
cast_lt (cast_succ a) h = a :=
by cases a; refl
lemma cast_succ_injective (n : ℕ) : injective (@fin.cast_succ n) :=
(cast_succ : fin n ↪o _).injective
lemma cast_succ_inj {a b : fin n} : a.cast_succ = b.cast_succ ↔ a = b :=
(cast_succ_injective n).eq_iff
lemma cast_succ_lt_last (a : fin n) : cast_succ a < last n := lt_iff_coe_lt_coe.mpr a.is_lt
@[simp] lemma cast_succ_zero : cast_succ (0 : fin (n + 1)) = 0 := rfl
/-- `cast_succ i` is positive when `i` is positive -/
lemma cast_succ_pos (i : fin (n + 1)) (h : 0 < i) : 0 < cast_succ i :=
by simpa [lt_iff_coe_lt_coe] using h
lemma last_pos : (0 : fin (n + 2)) < last (n + 1) :=
by simp [lt_iff_coe_lt_coe]
lemma coe_nat_eq_last (n) : (n : fin (n + 1)) = fin.last n :=
by { rw [←fin.of_nat_eq_coe, fin.of_nat, fin.last], simp only [nat.mod_eq_of_lt n.lt_succ_self] }
lemma le_coe_last (i : fin (n + 1)) : i ≤ n :=
by { rw fin.coe_nat_eq_last, exact fin.le_last i }
lemma eq_last_of_not_lt {i : fin (n+1)} (h : ¬ (i : ℕ) < n) : i = last n :=
le_antisymm (le_last i) (not_lt.1 h)
lemma add_one_pos (i : fin (n + 1)) (h : i < fin.last n) : (0 : fin (n + 1)) < i + 1 :=
begin
cases n,
{ exact absurd h (nat.not_lt_zero _) },
{ rw [lt_iff_coe_lt_coe, coe_last, ←add_lt_add_iff_right 1] at h,
rw [lt_iff_coe_lt_coe, coe_add, coe_zero, coe_one, nat.mod_eq_of_lt h],
exact nat.zero_lt_succ _ }
end
lemma one_pos : (0 : fin (n + 2)) < 1 := succ_pos 0
lemma zero_ne_one : (0 : fin (n + 2)) ≠ 1 := ne_of_lt one_pos
@[simp] lemma zero_eq_one_iff : (0 : fin (n + 1)) = 1 ↔ n = 0 :=
begin
split,
{ cases n; intro h,
{ refl },
{ have := zero_ne_one, contradiction } },
{ rintro rfl, refl }
end
@[simp] lemma one_eq_zero_iff : (1 : fin (n + 1)) = 0 ↔ n = 0 :=
by rw [eq_comm, zero_eq_one_iff]
lemma cast_succ_fin_succ (n : ℕ) (j : fin n) :
cast_succ (fin.succ j) = fin.succ (cast_succ j) :=
by { simp [fin.ext_iff], }
@[norm_cast, simp] lemma coe_eq_cast_succ : (a : fin (n + 1)) = a.cast_succ :=
begin
ext,
exact coe_val_of_lt (nat.lt.step a.is_lt),
end
@[simp] lemma coe_succ_eq_succ : a.cast_succ + 1 = a.succ :=
begin
cases n,
{ exact fin_zero_elim a },
{ simp [a.is_lt, eq_iff_veq, add_def, nat.mod_eq_of_lt] }
end
lemma lt_succ : a.cast_succ < a.succ :=
by { rw [cast_succ, lt_iff_coe_lt_coe, coe_cast_add, coe_succ], exact lt_add_one a.val }
@[simp] lemma pred_one {n : ℕ} : fin.pred (1 : fin (n + 2)) (ne.symm (ne_of_lt one_pos)) = 0 := rfl
lemma pred_add_one (i : fin (n + 2)) (h : (i : ℕ) < n + 1) :
pred (i + 1) (ne_of_gt (add_one_pos _ (lt_iff_coe_lt_coe.mpr h))) = cast_lt i h :=
begin
rw [ext_iff, coe_pred, coe_cast_lt, coe_add, coe_one, mod_eq_of_lt, nat.add_sub_cancel],
exact add_lt_add_right h 1,
end
lemma nat_add_zero {n : ℕ} : fin.nat_add 0 = (fin.cast (zero_add n).symm).to_rel_embedding :=
by { ext, apply zero_add }
/-- `min n m` as an element of `fin (m + 1)`. -/
def clamp (n m : ℕ) : fin (m + 1) := of_nat $ min n m
@[simp] lemma coe_clamp (n m : ℕ) : (clamp n m : ℕ) = min n m :=
nat.mod_eq_of_lt $ nat.lt_succ_iff.mpr $ min_le_right _ _
/-- Embedding `i : fin n` into `fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : fin (n + 1)`
embeds `i` by `cast_succ` when the resulting `i.cast_succ < p`. -/
lemma succ_above_below (p : fin (n + 1)) (i : fin n) (h : i.cast_succ < p) :
p.succ_above i = i.cast_succ :=
by { rw [succ_above], exact if_pos h }
/-- Embedding `fin n` into `fin (n + 1)` with a hole around zero embeds by `succ`. -/
@[simp] lemma succ_above_zero : ⇑(succ_above (0 : fin (n + 1))) = fin.succ := rfl
/-- Embedding `fin n` into `fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `last n` embeds by `cast_succ`. -/
@[simp] lemma succ_above_last : succ_above (fin.last n) = cast_succ :=
by { ext, simp only [succ_above_below, cast_succ_lt_last] }
lemma succ_above_last_apply (i : fin n) : succ_above (fin.last n) i = i.cast_succ :=
by rw succ_above_last
/-- Embedding `i : fin n` into `fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : fin (n + 1)`
embeds `i` by `succ` when the resulting `p < i.succ`. -/
lemma succ_above_above (p : fin (n + 1)) (i : fin n) (h : p ≤ i.cast_succ) :
p.succ_above i = i.succ :=
by simp [succ_above, h.not_lt]
/-- Embedding `i : fin n` into `fin (n + 1)` is always about some hole `p`. -/
lemma succ_above_lt_ge (p : fin (n + 1)) (i : fin n) : i.cast_succ < p ∨ p ≤ i.cast_succ :=
lt_or_ge (cast_succ i) p
/-- Embedding `i : fin n` into `fin (n + 1)` is always about some hole `p`. -/
lemma succ_above_lt_gt (p : fin (n + 1)) (i : fin n) : i.cast_succ < p ∨ p < i.succ :=
or.cases_on (succ_above_lt_ge p i)
(λ h, or.inl h) (λ h, or.inr (lt_of_le_of_lt h (cast_succ_lt_succ i)))
/-- Embedding `i : fin n` into `fin (n + 1)` using a pivot `p` that is greater
results in a value that is less than `p`. -/
@[simp] lemma succ_above_lt_iff (p : fin (n + 1)) (i : fin n) :
p.succ_above i < p ↔ i.cast_succ < p :=
begin
refine iff.intro _ _,
{ intro h,
cases succ_above_lt_ge p i with H H,
{ exact H },
{ rw succ_above_above _ _ H at h,
exact lt_trans (cast_succ_lt_succ i) h } },
{ intro h,
rw succ_above_below _ _ h,
exact h }
end
/-- Embedding `i : fin n` into `fin (n + 1)` using a pivot `p` that is lesser
results in a value that is greater than `p`. -/
lemma lt_succ_above_iff (p : fin (n + 1)) (i : fin n) : p < p.succ_above i ↔ p ≤ i.cast_succ :=
begin
refine iff.intro _ _,
{ intro h,
cases succ_above_lt_ge p i with H H,
{ rw succ_above_below _ _ H at h,
exact le_of_lt h },
{ exact H } },
{ intro h,
rw succ_above_above _ _ h,
exact lt_of_le_of_lt h (cast_succ_lt_succ i) },
end
/-- Embedding `i : fin n` into `fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : fin (n + 1)`
never results in `p` itself -/
theorem succ_above_ne (p : fin (n + 1)) (i : fin n) : p.succ_above i ≠ p :=
begin
intro eq,
by_cases H : i.cast_succ < p,
{ simpa [lt_irrefl, ←succ_above_below _ _ H, eq] using H },
{ simpa [←succ_above_above _ _ (le_of_not_lt H), eq] using cast_succ_lt_succ i }
end
/-- Embedding a positive `fin n` results in a positive fin (n + 1)` -/
lemma succ_above_pos (p : fin (n + 2)) (i : fin (n + 1)) (h : 0 < i) : 0 < p.succ_above i :=
begin
by_cases H : i.cast_succ < p,
{ simpa [succ_above_below _ _ H] using cast_succ_pos _ h },
{ simpa [succ_above_above _ _ (le_of_not_lt H)] using succ_pos _ },
end
/-- Given a fixed pivot `x : fin (n + 1)`, `x.succ_above` is injective -/
lemma succ_above_right_injective {x : fin (n + 1)} : injective (succ_above x) :=
(succ_above x).injective
/-- Given a fixed pivot `x : fin (n + 1)`, `x.succ_above` is injective -/
lemma succ_above_right_inj {x : fin (n + 1)} :
x.succ_above a = x.succ_above b ↔ a = b :=
succ_above_right_injective.eq_iff
/-- Embedding a `fin (n + 1)` into `fin n` and embedding it back around the same hole
gives the starting `fin (n + 1)` -/
@[simp] lemma succ_above_pred_above (p i : fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≠ p) :
p.succ_above (p.pred_above i h) = i :=
begin
rw pred_above,
cases lt_or_le i p with H H,
{ simp only [succ_above_below, cast_succ_cast_lt, H, dif_pos]},
{ rw le_iff_coe_le_coe at H,
rw succ_above_above,
{ simp only [le_iff_coe_le_coe, H, not_lt, dif_neg, succ_pred] },
{ simp only [le_iff_coe_le_coe, H, coe_pred, not_lt, dif_neg, coe_cast_succ],
exact le_pred_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_ne H (vne_of_ne h.symm)) } }
end
/-- Embedding a `fin n` into `fin (n + 1)` and embedding it back around the same hole
gives the starting `fin n` -/
@[simp] lemma pred_above_succ_above (p : fin (n + 1)) (i : fin n) :
p.pred_above (p.succ_above i) (succ_above_ne _ _) = i :=
by rw [← succ_above_right_inj, succ_above_pred_above]
@[simp] theorem pred_above_zero {i : fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) :
pred_above 0 i hi = i.pred hi :=
rfl
lemma forall_iff_succ_above {p : fin (n + 1) → Prop} (i : fin (n + 1)) :
(∀ j, p j) ↔ p i ∧ ∀ j, p (i.succ_above j) :=
⟨λ h, ⟨h _, λ j, h _⟩,
λ h j, if hj : j = i then (hj.symm ▸ h.1) else (i.succ_above_pred_above j hj ▸ h.2 _)⟩
/-- `succ_above` is injective at the pivot -/
lemma succ_above_left_injective : injective (@succ_above n) :=
λ x y, begin
contrapose!,
intros H h,
have key : succ_above x (y.pred_above x H) = succ_above y (y.pred_above x H), by rw h,
rw [succ_above_pred_above] at key,
exact absurd key (succ_above_ne x _)
end
/-- `succ_above` is injective at the pivot -/
lemma succ_above_left_inj {x y : fin (n + 1)} :
x.succ_above = y.succ_above ↔ x = y :=
succ_above_left_injective.eq_iff
/-- A function `f` on `fin n` is strictly monotone if and only if `f i < f (i+1)` for all `i`. -/
lemma strict_mono_iff_lt_succ {α : Type*} [preorder α] {f : fin n → α} :
strict_mono f ↔ ∀ i (h : i + 1 < n), f ⟨i, lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.le_succ i) h⟩ < f ⟨i+1, h⟩ :=
begin
split,
{ assume H i hi,
apply H,
exact nat.lt_succ_self _ },
{ assume H,
have A : ∀ i j (h : i < j) (h' : j < n), f ⟨i, lt_trans h h'⟩ < f ⟨j, h'⟩,
{ assume i j h h',
induction h with k h IH,
{ exact H _ _ },
{ exact lt_trans (IH (nat.lt_of_succ_lt h')) (H _ _) } },
assume i j hij,
convert A (i : ℕ) (j : ℕ) hij j.2; ext; simp only [subtype.coe_eta] }
end
section rec
/-- Define `C n i` by induction on `i : fin n` interpreted as `(0 : fin (n - i)).succ.succ…`.
This function has two arguments: `H0 n` defines `0`-th element `C (n+1) 0` of an `(n+1)`-tuple,
and `Hs n i` defines `(i+1)`-st element of `(n+1)`-tuple based on `n`, `i`, and `i`-th element
of `n`-tuple. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] def succ_rec
{C : Π n, fin n → Sort*}
(H0 : Π n, C (succ n) 0)
(Hs : Π n i, C n i → C (succ n) i.succ) : Π {n : ℕ} (i : fin n), C n i
| 0 i := i.elim0
| (succ n) ⟨0, _⟩ := H0 _
| (succ n) ⟨succ i, h⟩ := Hs _ _ (succ_rec ⟨i, lt_of_succ_lt_succ h⟩)
/-- Define `C n i` by induction on `i : fin n` interpreted as `(0 : fin (n - i)).succ.succ…`.
This function has two arguments: `H0 n` defines `0`-th element `C (n+1) 0` of an `(n+1)`-tuple,
and `Hs n i` defines `(i+1)`-st element of `(n+1)`-tuple based on `n`, `i`, and `i`-th element
of `n`-tuple.
A version of `fin.succ_rec` taking `i : fin n` as the first argument. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] def succ_rec_on {n : ℕ} (i : fin n)
{C : Π n, fin n → Sort*}
(H0 : Π n, C (succ n) 0)
(Hs : Π n i, C n i → C (succ n) i.succ) : C n i :=
i.succ_rec H0 Hs
@[simp] theorem succ_rec_on_zero {C : ∀ n, fin n → Sort*} {H0 Hs} (n) :
@fin.succ_rec_on (succ n) 0 C H0 Hs = H0 n :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem succ_rec_on_succ {C : ∀ n, fin n → Sort*} {H0 Hs} {n} (i : fin n) :
@fin.succ_rec_on (succ n) i.succ C H0 Hs = Hs n i (fin.succ_rec_on i H0 Hs) :=
by cases i; refl
/--
Define `C i` by induction on `i : fin (n + 1)` via induction on the underlying `nat` value.
This function has two arguments: `h0` handles the base case on `C 0`,
and `hs` defines the inductive step using `C i.cast_succ`.
-/
@[elab_as_eliminator] def induction
{C : fin (n + 1) → Sort*}
(h0 : C 0)
(hs : ∀ i : fin n, C i.cast_succ → C i.succ) :
Π (i : fin (n + 1)), C i :=
begin
rintro ⟨i, hi⟩,
induction i with i IH,
{ rwa [fin.mk_zero] },
{ refine hs ⟨i, lt_of_succ_lt_succ hi⟩ _,
exact IH (lt_of_succ_lt hi) }
end
/--
Define `C i` by induction on `i : fin (n + 1)` via induction on the underlying `nat` value.
This function has two arguments: `h0` handles the base case on `C 0`,
and `hs` defines the inductive step using `C i.cast_succ`.
A version of `fin.induction` taking `i : fin (n + 1)` as the first argument.
-/
@[elab_as_eliminator] def induction_on (i : fin (n + 1))
{C : fin (n + 1) → Sort*}
(h0 : C 0)
(hs : ∀ i : fin n, C i.cast_succ → C i.succ) : C i :=
induction h0 hs i
/-- Define `f : Π i : fin n.succ, C i` by separately handling the cases `i = 0` and
`i = j.succ`, `j : fin n`. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] def cases
{C : fin (succ n) → Sort*} (H0 : C 0) (Hs : Π i : fin n, C (i.succ)) :
Π (i : fin (succ n)), C i :=
induction H0 (λ i _, Hs i)
@[simp] theorem cases_zero {n} {C : fin (succ n) → Sort*} {H0 Hs} : @fin.cases n C H0 Hs 0 = H0 :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem cases_succ {n} {C : fin (succ n) → Sort*} {H0 Hs} (i : fin n) :
@fin.cases n C H0 Hs i.succ = Hs i :=
by cases i; refl
@[simp] theorem cases_succ' {n} {C : fin (succ n) → Sort*} {H0 Hs} {i : ℕ} (h : i + 1 < n + 1) :
@fin.cases n C H0 Hs ⟨i.succ, h⟩ = Hs ⟨i, lt_of_succ_lt_succ h⟩ :=
by cases i; refl
lemma forall_fin_succ {P : fin (n+1) → Prop} :
(∀ i, P i) ↔ P 0 ∧ (∀ i:fin n, P i.succ) :=
⟨λ H, ⟨H 0, λ i, H _⟩, λ ⟨H0, H1⟩ i, fin.cases H0 H1 i⟩
lemma exists_fin_succ {P : fin (n+1) → Prop} :
(∃ i, P i) ↔ P 0 ∨ (∃i:fin n, P i.succ) :=
⟨λ ⟨i, h⟩, fin.cases or.inl (λ i hi, or.inr ⟨i, hi⟩) i h,
λ h, or.elim h (λ h, ⟨0, h⟩) $ λ⟨i, hi⟩, ⟨i.succ, hi⟩⟩
end rec
section tuple
/-!
### Tuples
We can think of the type `Π(i : fin n), α i` as `n`-tuples of elements of possibly varying type
`α i`. A particular case is `fin n → α` of elements with all the same type. Here are some relevant
operations, first about adding or removing elements at the beginning of a tuple.
-/
/-- There is exactly one tuple of size zero. -/
instance tuple0_unique (α : fin 0 → Type u) : unique (Π i : fin 0, α i) :=
{ default := fin_zero_elim, uniq := λ x, funext fin_zero_elim }
@[simp] lemma tuple0_le {α : Π i : fin 0, Type*} [Π i, preorder (α i)] (f g : Π i, α i) : f ≤ g :=
fin_zero_elim
variables {α : fin (n+1) → Type u} (x : α 0) (q : Πi, α i) (p : Π(i : fin n), α (i.succ))
(i : fin n) (y : α i.succ) (z : α 0)
/-- The tail of an `n+1` tuple, i.e., its last `n` entries. -/
def tail (q : Πi, α i) : (Π(i : fin n), α (i.succ)) := λ i, q i.succ
/-- Adding an element at the beginning of an `n`-tuple, to get an `n+1`-tuple. -/
def cons (x : α 0) (p : Π(i : fin n), α (i.succ)) : Πi, α i :=
λ j, fin.cases x p j
@[simp] lemma tail_cons : tail (cons x p) = p :=
by simp [tail, cons]
@[simp] lemma cons_succ : cons x p i.succ = p i :=
by simp [cons]
@[simp] lemma cons_zero : cons x p 0 = x :=
by simp [cons]
/-- Updating a tuple and adding an element at the beginning commute. -/
@[simp] lemma cons_update : cons x (update p i y) = update (cons x p) i.succ y :=
begin
ext j,
by_cases h : j = 0,
{ rw h, simp [ne.symm (succ_ne_zero i)] },
{ let j' := pred j h,
have : j'.succ = j := succ_pred j h,
rw [← this, cons_succ],
by_cases h' : j' = i,
{ rw h', simp },
{ have : j'.succ ≠ i.succ, by rwa [ne.def, succ_inj],
rw [update_noteq h', update_noteq this, cons_succ] } }
end
/-- Adding an element at the beginning of a tuple and then updating it amounts to adding it
directly. -/
lemma update_cons_zero : update (cons x p) 0 z = cons z p :=
begin
ext j,
by_cases h : j = 0,
{ rw h, simp },
{ simp only [h, update_noteq, ne.def, not_false_iff],
let j' := pred j h,
have : j'.succ = j := succ_pred j h,
rw [← this, cons_succ, cons_succ] }
end
/-- Concatenating the first element of a tuple with its tail gives back the original tuple -/
@[simp] lemma cons_self_tail : cons (q 0) (tail q) = q :=
begin
ext j,
by_cases h : j = 0,
{ rw h, simp },
{ let j' := pred j h,
have : j'.succ = j := succ_pred j h,
rw [← this, tail, cons_succ] }
end
/-- Updating the first element of a tuple does not change the tail. -/
@[simp] lemma tail_update_zero : tail (update q 0 z) = tail q :=
by { ext j, simp [tail, fin.succ_ne_zero] }
/-- Updating a nonzero element and taking the tail commute. -/
@[simp] lemma tail_update_succ :
tail (update q i.succ y) = update (tail q) i y :=
begin
ext j,
by_cases h : j = i,
{ rw h, simp [tail] },
{ simp [tail, (fin.succ_injective n).ne h, h] }
end
lemma comp_cons {α : Type*} {β : Type*} (g : α → β) (y : α) (q : fin n → α) :
g ∘ (cons y q) = cons (g y) (g ∘ q) :=
begin
ext j,
by_cases h : j = 0,
{ rw h, refl },
{ let j' := pred j h,
have : j'.succ = j := succ_pred j h,
rw [← this, cons_succ, comp_app, cons_succ] }
end
lemma comp_tail {α : Type*} {β : Type*} (g : α → β) (q : fin n.succ → α) :
g ∘ (tail q) = tail (g ∘ q) :=
by { ext j, simp [tail] }
lemma le_cons [Π i, preorder (α i)] {x : α 0} {q : Π i, α i} {p : Π i : fin n, α i.succ} :
q ≤ cons x p ↔ q 0 ≤ x ∧ tail q ≤ p :=
forall_fin_succ.trans $ and_congr iff.rfl $ forall_congr $ λ j, by simp [tail]
lemma cons_le [Π i, preorder (α i)] {x : α 0} {q : Π i, α i} {p : Π i : fin n, α i.succ} :
cons x p ≤ q ↔ x ≤ q 0 ∧ p ≤ tail q :=
@le_cons _ (λ i, order_dual (α i)) _ x q p
/-- `fin.append ho u v` appends two vectors of lengths `m` and `n` to produce
one of length `o = m + n`. `ho` provides control of definitional equality
for the vector length. -/
def append {α : Type*} {o : ℕ} (ho : o = m + n) (u : fin m → α) (v : fin n → α) : fin o → α :=
λ i, if h : (i : ℕ) < m
then u ⟨i, h⟩
else v ⟨(i : ℕ) - m, (nat.sub_lt_left_iff_lt_add (le_of_not_lt h)).2 (ho ▸ i.property)⟩
end tuple
section tuple_right
/-! In the previous section, we have discussed inserting or removing elements on the left of a
tuple. In this section, we do the same on the right. A difference is that `fin (n+1)` is constructed
inductively from `fin n` starting from the left, not from the right. This implies that Lean needs
more help to realize that elements belong to the right types, i.e., we need to insert casts at
several places. -/
variables {α : fin (n+1) → Type u} (x : α (last n)) (q : Πi, α i) (p : Π(i : fin n), α i.cast_succ)
(i : fin n) (y : α i.cast_succ) (z : α (last n))
/-- The beginning of an `n+1` tuple, i.e., its first `n` entries -/
def init (q : Πi, α i) (i : fin n) : α i.cast_succ :=
q i.cast_succ
/-- Adding an element at the end of an `n`-tuple, to get an `n+1`-tuple. The name `snoc` comes from
`cons` (i.e., adding an element to the left of a tuple) read in reverse order. -/
def snoc (p : Π(i : fin n), α i.cast_succ) (x : α (last n)) (i : fin (n+1)) : α i :=
if h : i.val < n
then _root_.cast (by rw fin.cast_succ_cast_lt i h) (p (cast_lt i h))
else _root_.cast (by rw eq_last_of_not_lt h) x
@[simp] lemma init_snoc : init (snoc p x) = p :=
begin
ext i,
have h' := fin.cast_lt_cast_succ i i.is_lt,
simp [init, snoc, i.is_lt, h'],
convert cast_eq rfl (p i)
end
@[simp] lemma snoc_cast_succ : snoc p x i.cast_succ = p i :=
begin
have : i.cast_succ.val < n := i.is_lt,
have h' := fin.cast_lt_cast_succ i i.is_lt,
simp [snoc, this, h'],
convert cast_eq rfl (p i)
end
@[simp] lemma snoc_last : snoc p x (last n) = x :=
by { simp [snoc] }
/-- Updating a tuple and adding an element at the end commute. -/
@[simp] lemma snoc_update : snoc (update p i y) x = update (snoc p x) i.cast_succ y :=
begin
ext j,
by_cases h : j.val < n,
{ simp only [snoc, h, dif_pos],
by_cases h' : j = cast_succ i,
{ have C1 : α i.cast_succ = α j, by rw h',
have E1 : update (snoc p x) i.cast_succ y j = _root_.cast C1 y,
{ have : update (snoc p x) j (_root_.cast C1 y) j = _root_.cast C1 y, by simp,
convert this,
{ exact h'.symm },
{ exact heq_of_eq_mp (congr_arg α (eq.symm h')) rfl } },
have C2 : α i.cast_succ = α (cast_succ (cast_lt j h)),
by rw [cast_succ_cast_lt, h'],
have E2 : update p i y (cast_lt j h) = _root_.cast C2 y,
{ have : update p (cast_lt j h) (_root_.cast C2 y) (cast_lt j h) = _root_.cast C2 y,
by simp,
convert this,
{ simp [h, h'] },
{ exact heq_of_eq_mp C2 rfl } },
rw [E1, E2],
exact eq_rec_compose _ _ _ },
{ have : ¬(cast_lt j h = i),
by { assume E, apply h', rw [← E, cast_succ_cast_lt] },
simp [h', this, snoc, h] } },
{ rw eq_last_of_not_lt h,
simp [ne.symm (ne_of_lt (cast_succ_lt_last i))] }
end
/-- Adding an element at the beginning of a tuple and then updating it amounts to adding it
directly. -/
lemma update_snoc_last : update (snoc p x) (last n) z = snoc p z :=
begin
ext j,
by_cases h : j.val < n,
{ have : j ≠ last n := ne_of_lt h,
simp [h, update_noteq, this, snoc] },
{ rw eq_last_of_not_lt h,
simp }
end
/-- Concatenating the first element of a tuple with its tail gives back the original tuple -/
@[simp] lemma snoc_init_self : snoc (init q) (q (last n)) = q :=
begin
ext j,
by_cases h : j.val < n,
{ have : j ≠ last n := ne_of_lt h,
simp [h, update_noteq, this, snoc, init, cast_succ_cast_lt],
have A : cast_succ (cast_lt j h) = j := cast_succ_cast_lt _ _,
rw ← cast_eq rfl (q j),
congr' 1; rw A },
{ rw eq_last_of_not_lt h,
simp }
end
/-- Updating the last element of a tuple does not change the beginning. -/
@[simp] lemma init_update_last : init (update q (last n) z) = init q :=
by { ext j, simp [init, ne_of_lt, cast_succ_lt_last] }
/-- Updating an element and taking the beginning commute. -/
@[simp] lemma init_update_cast_succ :
init (update q i.cast_succ y) = update (init q) i y :=
begin
ext j,
by_cases h : j = i,
{ rw h, simp [init] },
{ simp [init, h] }
end
/-- `tail` and `init` commute. We state this lemma in a non-dependent setting, as otherwise it
would involve a cast to convince Lean that the two types are equal, making it harder to use. -/
lemma tail_init_eq_init_tail {β : Type*} (q : fin (n+2) → β) :
tail (init q) = init (tail q) :=
by { ext i, simp [tail, init, cast_succ_fin_succ] }
/-- `cons` and `snoc` commute. We state this lemma in a non-dependent setting, as otherwise it
would involve a cast to convince Lean that the two types are equal, making it harder to use. -/
lemma cons_snoc_eq_snoc_cons {β : Type*} (a : β) (q : fin n → β) (b : β) :
@cons n.succ (λ i, β) a (snoc q b) = snoc (cons a q) b :=
begin
ext i,
by_cases h : i = 0,
{ rw h, refl },
set j := pred i h with ji,
have : i = j.succ, by rw [ji, succ_pred],
rw [this, cons_succ],
by_cases h' : j.val < n,
{ set k := cast_lt j h' with jk,
have : j = k.cast_succ, by rw [jk, cast_succ_cast_lt],
rw [this, ← cast_succ_fin_succ],
simp },
rw [eq_last_of_not_lt h', succ_last],
simp
end
lemma comp_snoc {α : Type*} {β : Type*} (g : α → β) (q : fin n → α) (y : α) :
g ∘ (snoc q y) = snoc (g ∘ q) (g y) :=
begin
ext j,
by_cases h : j.val < n,
{ have : j ≠ last n := ne_of_lt h,
simp [h, this, snoc, cast_succ_cast_lt] },
{ rw eq_last_of_not_lt h,
simp }
end
lemma comp_init {α : Type*} {β : Type*} (g : α → β) (q : fin n.succ → α) :
g ∘ (init q) = init (g ∘ q) :=
by { ext j, simp [init] }
end tuple_right
section insert_nth
variables {α : fin (n+1) → Type u} {β : Type v}
/-- Insert an element into a tuple at a given position. For `i = 0` see `fin.cons`,
for `i = fin.last n` see `fin.snoc`. -/
def insert_nth (i : fin (n + 1)) (x : α i) (p : Π j : fin n, α (i.succ_above j))
(j : fin (n + 1)) : α j :=
if h : j = i
then _root_.cast (congr_arg α h.symm) x
else _root_.cast (congr_arg α $ succ_above_pred_above i _ h) (p $ i.pred_above j h)
@[simp] lemma insert_nth_apply_same (i : fin (n + 1)) (x : α i) (p : Π j, α (i.succ_above j)) :
insert_nth i x p i = x :=
by simp [insert_nth]
@[simp] lemma insert_nth_apply_succ_above (i : fin (n + 1)) (x : α i) (p : Π j, α (i.succ_above j))
(j : fin n) :
insert_nth i x p (i.succ_above j) = p j :=
begin
simp only [insert_nth, dif_neg (succ_above_ne _ _)],
refine eq_of_heq ((cast_heq _ _).trans _),
rw [pred_above_succ_above]
end
@[simp] lemma insert_nth_comp_succ_above (i : fin (n + 1)) (x : β) (p : fin n → β) :
insert_nth i x p ∘ i.succ_above = p :=
funext $ insert_nth_apply_succ_above i x p
lemma insert_nth_eq_iff {i : fin (n + 1)} {x : α i} {p : Π j, α (i.succ_above j)} {q : Π j, α j} :
i.insert_nth x p = q ↔ q i = x ∧ p = (λ j, q (i.succ_above j)) :=
by simp [funext_iff, forall_iff_succ_above i, eq_comm]
lemma eq_insert_nth_iff {i : fin (n + 1)} {x : α i} {p : Π j, α (i.succ_above j)} {q : Π j, α j} :
q = i.insert_nth x p ↔ q i = x ∧ p = (λ j, q (i.succ_above j)) :=
eq_comm.trans insert_nth_eq_iff
lemma insert_nth_zero (x : α 0) (p : Π j : fin n, α (succ_above 0 j)) :
insert_nth 0 x p = cons x (λ j, _root_.cast (congr_arg α (congr_fun succ_above_zero j)) (p j)) :=
begin
refine insert_nth_eq_iff.2 ⟨by simp, _⟩,
ext j,
convert (cons_succ _ _ _).symm
end
@[simp] lemma insert_nth_zero' (x : β) (p : fin n → β) :
@insert_nth _ (λ _, β) 0 x p = cons x p :=
by simp [insert_nth_zero]
lemma insert_nth_last (x : α (last n)) (p : Π j : fin n, α ((last n).succ_above j)) :
insert_nth (last n) x p =
snoc (λ j, _root_.cast (congr_arg α (succ_above_last_apply j)) (p j)) x :=
begin
refine insert_nth_eq_iff.2 ⟨by simp, _⟩,
ext j,
apply eq_of_heq,
transitivity snoc (λ j, _root_.cast (congr_arg α (succ_above_last_apply j)) (p j)) x j.cast_succ,
{ rw [snoc_cast_succ], exact (cast_heq _ _).symm },
{ apply congr_arg_heq,
rw [succ_above_last] }
end
@[simp] lemma insert_nth_last' (x : β) (p : fin n → β) :
@insert_nth _ (λ _, β) (last n) x p = snoc p x :=
by simp [insert_nth_last]
variables [Π i, preorder (α i)]
lemma insert_nth_le_iff {i : fin (n + 1)} {x : α i} {p : Π j, α (i.succ_above j)} {q : Π j, α j} :
i.insert_nth x p ≤ q ↔ x ≤ q i ∧ p ≤ (λ j, q (i.succ_above j)) :=
by simp [pi.le_def, forall_iff_succ_above i]
lemma le_insert_nth_iff {i : fin (n + 1)} {x : α i} {p : Π j, α (i.succ_above j)} {q : Π j, α j} :
q ≤ i.insert_nth x p ↔ q i ≤ x ∧ (λ j, q (i.succ_above j)) ≤ p :=
by simp [pi.le_def, forall_iff_succ_above i]
open set
lemma insert_nth_mem_Icc {i : fin (n + 1)} {x : α i} {p : Π j, α (i.succ_above j)}
{q₁ q₂ : Π j, α j} :
i.insert_nth x p ∈ Icc q₁ q₂ ↔
x ∈ Icc (q₁ i) (q₂ i) ∧ p ∈ Icc (λ j, q₁ (i.succ_above j)) (λ j, q₂ (i.succ_above j)) :=
by simp only [mem_Icc, insert_nth_le_iff, le_insert_nth_iff, and.assoc, and.left_comm]
lemma preimage_insert_nth_Icc_of_mem {i : fin (n + 1)} {x : α i} {q₁ q₂ : Π j, α j}
(hx : x ∈ Icc (q₁ i) (q₂ i)) :
i.insert_nth x ⁻¹' (Icc q₁ q₂) = Icc (λ j, q₁ (i.succ_above j)) (λ j, q₂ (i.succ_above j)) :=
set.ext $ λ p, by simp only [mem_preimage, insert_nth_mem_Icc, hx, true_and]
lemma preimage_insert_nth_Icc_of_not_mem {i : fin (n + 1)} {x : α i} {q₁ q₂ : Π j, α j}
(hx : x ∉ Icc (q₁ i) (q₂ i)) :
i.insert_nth x ⁻¹' (Icc q₁ q₂) = ∅ :=
set.ext $ λ p, by simp only [mem_preimage, insert_nth_mem_Icc, hx, false_and, mem_empty_eq]
end insert_nth
section find
/-- `find p` returns the first index `n` where `p n` is satisfied, and `none` if it is never
satisfied. -/
def find : Π {n : ℕ} (p : fin n → Prop) [decidable_pred p], option (fin n)
| 0 p _ := none
| (n+1) p _ := by resetI; exact option.cases_on
(@find n (λ i, p (i.cast_lt (nat.lt_succ_of_lt i.2))) _)
(if h : p (fin.last n) then some (fin.last n) else none)
(λ i, some (i.cast_lt (nat.lt_succ_of_lt i.2)))
/-- If `find p = some i`, then `p i` holds -/
lemma find_spec : Π {n : ℕ} (p : fin n → Prop) [decidable_pred p] {i : fin n}
(hi : i ∈ by exactI fin.find p), p i
| 0 p I i hi := option.no_confusion hi
| (n+1) p I i hi := begin
dsimp [find] at hi,
resetI,
cases h : find (λ i : fin n, (p (i.cast_lt (nat.lt_succ_of_lt i.2)))) with j,
{ rw h at hi,
dsimp at hi,
split_ifs at hi with hl hl,
{ exact option.some_inj.1 hi ▸ hl },
{ exact option.no_confusion hi } },
{ rw h at hi,
rw [← option.some_inj.1 hi],
exact find_spec _ h }
end
/-- `find p` does not return `none` if and only if `p i` holds at some index `i`. -/
lemma is_some_find_iff : Π {n : ℕ} {p : fin n → Prop} [decidable_pred p],
by exactI (find p).is_some ↔ ∃ i, p i
| 0 p _ := iff_of_false (λ h, bool.no_confusion h) (λ ⟨i, _⟩, fin_zero_elim i)
| (n+1) p _ := ⟨λ h, begin
rw [option.is_some_iff_exists] at h,
cases h with i hi,
exactI ⟨i, find_spec _ hi⟩
end, λ ⟨⟨i, hin⟩, hi⟩,
begin
resetI,
dsimp [find],
cases h : find (λ i : fin n, (p (i.cast_lt (nat.lt_succ_of_lt i.2)))) with j,
{ split_ifs with hl hl,
{ exact option.is_some_some },
{ have := (@is_some_find_iff n (λ x, p (x.cast_lt (nat.lt_succ_of_lt x.2))) _).2
⟨⟨i, lt_of_le_of_ne (nat.le_of_lt_succ hin)
(λ h, by clear_aux_decl; cases h; exact hl hi)⟩, hi⟩,
rw h at this,
exact this } },
{ simp }
end⟩
/-- `find p` returns `none` if and only if `p i` never holds. -/
lemma find_eq_none_iff {n : ℕ} {p : fin n → Prop} [decidable_pred p] :
find p = none ↔ ∀ i, ¬ p i :=
by rw [← not_exists, ← is_some_find_iff]; cases (find p); simp
/-- If `find p` returns `some i`, then `p j` does not hold for `j < i`, i.e., `i` is minimal among
the indices where `p` holds. -/
lemma find_min : Π {n : ℕ} {p : fin n → Prop} [decidable_pred p] {i : fin n}
(hi : i ∈ by exactI fin.find p) {j : fin n} (hj : j < i), ¬ p j
| 0 p _ i hi j hj hpj := option.no_confusion hi
| (n+1) p _ i hi ⟨j, hjn⟩ hj hpj := begin
resetI,
dsimp [find] at hi,
cases h : find (λ i : fin n, (p (i.cast_lt (nat.lt_succ_of_lt i.2)))) with k,
{ rw [h] at hi,
split_ifs at hi with hl hl,
{ have := option.some_inj.1 hi,
subst this,
rw [find_eq_none_iff] at h,
exact h ⟨j, hj⟩ hpj },
{ exact option.no_confusion hi } },
{ rw h at hi,
dsimp at hi,
have := option.some_inj.1 hi,
subst this,
exact find_min h (show (⟨j, lt_trans hj k.2⟩ : fin n) < k, from hj) hpj }
end
lemma find_min' {p : fin n → Prop} [decidable_pred p] {i : fin n}
(h : i ∈ fin.find p) {j : fin n} (hj : p j) : i ≤ j :=
le_of_not_gt (λ hij, find_min h hij hj)
lemma nat_find_mem_find {p : fin n → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
(h : ∃ i, ∃ hin : i < n, p ⟨i, hin⟩) :
(⟨nat.find h, (nat.find_spec h).fst⟩ : fin n) ∈ find p :=
let ⟨i, hin, hi⟩ := h in
begin
cases hf : find p with f,
{ rw [find_eq_none_iff] at hf,
exact (hf ⟨i, hin⟩ hi).elim },
{ refine option.some_inj.2 (le_antisymm _ _),
{ exact find_min' hf (nat.find_spec h).snd },
{ exact nat.find_min' _ ⟨f.2, by convert find_spec p hf;
exact fin.eta _ _⟩ } }
end
lemma mem_find_iff {p : fin n → Prop} [decidable_pred p] {i : fin n} :
i ∈ fin.find p ↔ p i ∧ ∀ j, p j → i ≤ j :=
⟨λ hi, ⟨find_spec _ hi, λ _, find_min' hi⟩,
begin
rintros ⟨hpi, hj⟩,
cases hfp : fin.find p,
{ rw [find_eq_none_iff] at hfp,
exact (hfp _ hpi).elim },
{ exact option.some_inj.2 (le_antisymm (find_min' hfp hpi) (hj _ (find_spec _ hfp))) }
end⟩
lemma find_eq_some_iff {p : fin n → Prop} [decidable_pred p] {i : fin n} :
fin.find p = some i ↔ p i ∧ ∀ j, p j → i ≤ j :=
mem_find_iff
lemma mem_find_of_unique {p : fin n → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
(h : ∀ i j, p i → p j → i = j) {i : fin n} (hi : p i) : i ∈ fin.find p :=
mem_find_iff.2 ⟨hi, λ j hj, le_of_eq $ h i j hi hj⟩
end find
@[simp]
lemma coe_of_nat_eq_mod (m n : ℕ) :
((n : fin (succ m)) : ℕ) = n % succ m :=
by rw [← of_nat_eq_coe]; refl
@[simp] lemma coe_of_nat_eq_mod' (m n : ℕ) [I : fact (0 < m)] :
(@fin.of_nat' _ I n : ℕ) = n % m :=
rfl
end fin
|
b177dbd15e56cada5964363d46fc67d57c4ba876 | 63abd62053d479eae5abf4951554e1064a4c45b4 | /src/data/fintype/basic.lean | 2b04ef2da74dd346b902a1f7e3bafa675b08af72 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Lix0120/mathlib | 0020745240315ed0e517cbf32e738d8f9811dd80 | e14c37827456fc6707f31b4d1d16f1f3a3205e91 | refs/heads/master | 1,673,102,855,024 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 308,930,245 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,604,164,710,000 | 1,604,163,547,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 51,877 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Mario Carneiro
Finite types.
-/
import tactic.wlog
import data.finset.powerset
import data.finset.lattice
import data.finset.pi
import data.array.lemmas
import order.well_founded
open_locale nat
universes u v
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
/-- `fintype α` means that `α` is finite, i.e. there are only
finitely many distinct elements of type `α`. The evidence of this
is a finset `elems` (a list up to permutation without duplicates),
together with a proof that everything of type `α` is in the list. -/
class fintype (α : Type*) :=
(elems [] : finset α)
(complete : ∀ x : α, x ∈ elems)
namespace finset
variable [fintype α]
/-- `univ` is the universal finite set of type `finset α` implied from
the assumption `fintype α`. -/
def univ : finset α := fintype.elems α
@[simp] theorem mem_univ (x : α) : x ∈ (univ : finset α) :=
fintype.complete x
@[simp] theorem mem_univ_val : ∀ x, x ∈ (univ : finset α).1 := mem_univ
@[simp] lemma coe_univ : ↑(univ : finset α) = (set.univ : set α) :=
by ext; simp
lemma univ_nonempty_iff : (univ : finset α).nonempty ↔ nonempty α :=
by rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_univ, set.nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty]
lemma univ_nonempty [nonempty α] : (univ : finset α).nonempty :=
univ_nonempty_iff.2 ‹_›
lemma univ_eq_empty : (univ : finset α) = ∅ ↔ ¬nonempty α :=
by rw [← univ_nonempty_iff, nonempty_iff_ne_empty, ne.def, not_not]
theorem subset_univ (s : finset α) : s ⊆ univ := λ a _, mem_univ a
instance : order_top (finset α) :=
{ top := univ,
le_top := subset_univ,
.. finset.partial_order }
instance [decidable_eq α] : boolean_algebra (finset α) :=
{ compl := λ s, univ \ s,
sdiff_eq := λ s t, by simp [ext_iff],
inf_compl_le_bot := λ s x hx, by simpa using hx,
top_le_sup_compl := λ s x hx, by simp,
..finset.distrib_lattice,
..finset.semilattice_inf_bot,
..finset.order_top,
..finset.has_sdiff }
lemma compl_eq_univ_sdiff [decidable_eq α] (s : finset α) : sᶜ = univ \ s := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_compl [decidable_eq α] {s : finset α} {x : α} : x ∈ sᶜ ↔ x ∉ s :=
by simp [compl_eq_univ_sdiff]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_compl [decidable_eq α] (s : finset α) : ↑(sᶜ) = (↑s : set α)ᶜ :=
set.ext $ λ x, mem_compl
theorem eq_univ_iff_forall {s : finset α} : s = univ ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s :=
by simp [ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma univ_inter [decidable_eq α] (s : finset α) :
univ ∩ s = s := ext $ λ a, by simp
@[simp] lemma inter_univ [decidable_eq α] (s : finset α) :
s ∩ univ = s :=
by rw [inter_comm, univ_inter]
@[simp] lemma piecewise_univ [∀i : α, decidable (i ∈ (univ : finset α))]
{δ : α → Sort*} (f g : Πi, δ i) : univ.piecewise f g = f :=
by { ext i, simp [piecewise] }
lemma univ_map_equiv_to_embedding {α β : Type*} [fintype α] [fintype β] (e : α ≃ β) :
univ.map e.to_embedding = univ :=
begin
apply eq_univ_iff_forall.mpr,
intro b,
rw [mem_map],
use e.symm b,
simp,
end
end finset
open finset function
namespace fintype
instance decidable_pi_fintype {α} {β : α → Type*} [∀a, decidable_eq (β a)] [fintype α] :
decidable_eq (Πa, β a) :=
assume f g, decidable_of_iff (∀ a ∈ fintype.elems α, f a = g a)
(by simp [function.funext_iff, fintype.complete])
instance decidable_forall_fintype {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] [fintype α] :
decidable (∀ a, p a) :=
decidable_of_iff (∀ a ∈ @univ α _, p a) (by simp)
instance decidable_exists_fintype {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] [fintype α] :
decidable (∃ a, p a) :=
decidable_of_iff (∃ a ∈ @univ α _, p a) (by simp)
instance decidable_eq_equiv_fintype [decidable_eq β] [fintype α] :
decidable_eq (α ≃ β) :=
λ a b, decidable_of_iff (a.1 = b.1) ⟨λ h, equiv.ext (congr_fun h), congr_arg _⟩
instance decidable_injective_fintype [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β] [fintype α] :
decidable_pred (injective : (α → β) → Prop) := λ x, by unfold injective; apply_instance
instance decidable_surjective_fintype [decidable_eq β] [fintype α] [fintype β] :
decidable_pred (surjective : (α → β) → Prop) := λ x, by unfold surjective; apply_instance
instance decidable_bijective_fintype [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β] [fintype α] [fintype β] :
decidable_pred (bijective : (α → β) → Prop) := λ x, by unfold bijective; apply_instance
instance decidable_left_inverse_fintype [decidable_eq α] [fintype α] (f : α → β) (g : β → α) :
decidable (function.right_inverse f g) :=
show decidable (∀ x, g (f x) = x), by apply_instance
instance decidable_right_inverse_fintype [decidable_eq β] [fintype β] (f : α → β) (g : β → α) :
decidable (function.left_inverse f g) :=
show decidable (∀ x, f (g x) = x), by apply_instance
/-- Construct a proof of `fintype α` from a universal multiset -/
def of_multiset [decidable_eq α] (s : multiset α)
(H : ∀ x : α, x ∈ s) : fintype α :=
⟨s.to_finset, by simpa using H⟩
/-- Construct a proof of `fintype α` from a universal list -/
def of_list [decidable_eq α] (l : list α)
(H : ∀ x : α, x ∈ l) : fintype α :=
⟨l.to_finset, by simpa using H⟩
theorem exists_univ_list (α) [fintype α] :
∃ l : list α, l.nodup ∧ ∀ x : α, x ∈ l :=
let ⟨l, e⟩ := quotient.exists_rep (@univ α _).1 in
by have := and.intro univ.2 mem_univ_val;
exact ⟨_, by rwa ← e at this⟩
/-- `card α` is the number of elements in `α`, defined when `α` is a fintype. -/
def card (α) [fintype α] : ℕ := (@univ α _).card
/-- If `l` lists all the elements of `α` without duplicates, then `α ≃ fin (l.length)`. -/
def equiv_fin_of_forall_mem_list {α} [decidable_eq α]
{l : list α} (h : ∀ x:α, x ∈ l) (nd : l.nodup) : α ≃ fin (l.length) :=
⟨λ a, ⟨_, list.index_of_lt_length.2 (h a)⟩,
λ i, l.nth_le i.1 i.2,
λ a, by simp,
λ ⟨i, h⟩, fin.eq_of_veq $ list.nodup_iff_nth_le_inj.1 nd _ _
(list.index_of_lt_length.2 (list.nth_le_mem _ _ _)) h $ by simp⟩
/-- There is (computably) a bijection between `α` and `fin n` where
`n = card α`. Since it is not unique, and depends on which permutation
of the universe list is used, the bijection is wrapped in `trunc` to
preserve computability. -/
def equiv_fin (α) [decidable_eq α] [fintype α] : trunc (α ≃ fin (card α)) :=
by unfold card finset.card; exact
quot.rec_on_subsingleton (@univ α _).1
(λ l (h : ∀ x:α, x ∈ l) (nd : l.nodup), trunc.mk (equiv_fin_of_forall_mem_list h nd))
mem_univ_val univ.2
theorem exists_equiv_fin (α) [fintype α] : ∃ n, nonempty (α ≃ fin n) :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq α; exact ⟨card α, nonempty_of_trunc (equiv_fin α)⟩
instance (α : Type*) : subsingleton (fintype α) :=
⟨λ ⟨s₁, h₁⟩ ⟨s₂, h₂⟩, by congr; simp [finset.ext_iff, h₁, h₂]⟩
/-- Given a predicate that can be represented by a finset, the subtype
associated to the predicate is a fintype. -/
protected def subtype {p : α → Prop} (s : finset α)
(H : ∀ x : α, x ∈ s ↔ p x) : fintype {x // p x} :=
⟨⟨multiset.pmap subtype.mk s.1 (λ x, (H x).1),
multiset.nodup_pmap (λ a _ b _, congr_arg subtype.val) s.2⟩,
λ ⟨x, px⟩, multiset.mem_pmap.2 ⟨x, (H x).2 px, rfl⟩⟩
theorem subtype_card {p : α → Prop} (s : finset α)
(H : ∀ x : α, x ∈ s ↔ p x) :
@card {x // p x} (fintype.subtype s H) = s.card :=
multiset.card_pmap _ _ _
theorem card_of_subtype {p : α → Prop} (s : finset α)
(H : ∀ x : α, x ∈ s ↔ p x) [fintype {x // p x}] :
card {x // p x} = s.card :=
by { rw ← subtype_card s H, congr }
/-- Construct a fintype from a finset with the same elements. -/
def of_finset {p : set α} (s : finset α) (H : ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ p) : fintype p :=
fintype.subtype s H
@[simp] theorem card_of_finset {p : set α} (s : finset α) (H : ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ p) :
@fintype.card p (of_finset s H) = s.card :=
fintype.subtype_card s H
theorem card_of_finset' {p : set α} (s : finset α)
(H : ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ p) [fintype p] : fintype.card p = s.card :=
by rw ← card_of_finset s H; congr
/-- If `f : α → β` is a bijection and `α` is a fintype, then `β` is also a fintype. -/
def of_bijective [fintype α] (f : α → β) (H : function.bijective f) : fintype β :=
⟨univ.map ⟨f, H.1⟩,
λ b, let ⟨a, e⟩ := H.2 b in e ▸ mem_map_of_mem _ (mem_univ _)⟩
/-- If `f : α → β` is a surjection and `α` is a fintype, then `β` is also a fintype. -/
def of_surjective [decidable_eq β] [fintype α] (f : α → β) (H : function.surjective f) : fintype β :=
⟨univ.image f, λ b, let ⟨a, e⟩ := H b in e ▸ mem_image_of_mem _ (mem_univ _)⟩
/-- Given an injective function to a fintype, the domain is also a
fintype. This is noncomputable because injectivity alone cannot be
used to construct preimages. -/
noncomputable def of_injective [fintype β] (f : α → β) (H : function.injective f) : fintype α :=
by letI := classical.dec; exact
if hα : nonempty α then by letI := classical.inhabited_of_nonempty hα;
exact of_surjective (inv_fun f) (inv_fun_surjective H)
else ⟨∅, λ x, (hα ⟨x⟩).elim⟩
/-- If `f : α ≃ β` and `α` is a fintype, then `β` is also a fintype. -/
def of_equiv (α : Type*) [fintype α] (f : α ≃ β) : fintype β := of_bijective _ f.bijective
theorem of_equiv_card [fintype α] (f : α ≃ β) :
@card β (of_equiv α f) = card α :=
multiset.card_map _ _
theorem card_congr {α β} [fintype α] [fintype β] (f : α ≃ β) : card α = card β :=
by rw ← of_equiv_card f; congr
theorem card_eq {α β} [F : fintype α] [G : fintype β] : card α = card β ↔ nonempty (α ≃ β) :=
⟨λ h, ⟨by classical;
calc α ≃ fin (card α) : trunc.out (equiv_fin α)
... ≃ fin (card β) : by rw h
... ≃ β : (trunc.out (equiv_fin β)).symm⟩,
λ ⟨f⟩, card_congr f⟩
/-- Subsingleton types are fintypes (with zero or one terms). -/
def of_subsingleton (a : α) [subsingleton α] : fintype α :=
⟨{a}, λ b, finset.mem_singleton.2 (subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩
@[simp] theorem univ_of_subsingleton (a : α) [subsingleton α] :
@univ _ (of_subsingleton a) = {a} := rfl
@[simp] theorem card_of_subsingleton (a : α) [subsingleton α] :
@fintype.card _ (of_subsingleton a) = 1 := rfl
end fintype
namespace set
/-- Construct a finset enumerating a set `s`, given a `fintype` instance. -/
def to_finset (s : set α) [fintype s] : finset α :=
⟨(@finset.univ s _).1.map subtype.val,
multiset.nodup_map (λ a b, subtype.eq) finset.univ.2⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_to_finset {s : set α} [fintype s] {a : α} : a ∈ s.to_finset ↔ a ∈ s :=
by simp [to_finset]
@[simp] theorem mem_to_finset_val {s : set α} [fintype s] {a : α} : a ∈ s.to_finset.1 ↔ a ∈ s :=
mem_to_finset
-- We use an arbitrary `[fintype s]` instance here,
-- not necessarily coming from a `[fintype α]`.
@[simp]
lemma to_finset_card {α : Type*} (s : set α) [fintype s] :
s.to_finset.card = fintype.card s :=
multiset.card_map subtype.val finset.univ.val
@[simp] theorem coe_to_finset (s : set α) [fintype s] : (↑s.to_finset : set α) = s :=
set.ext $ λ _, mem_to_finset
@[simp] theorem to_finset_inj {s t : set α} [fintype s] [fintype t] : s.to_finset = t.to_finset ↔ s = t :=
⟨λ h, by rw [← s.coe_to_finset, h, t.coe_to_finset], λ h, by simp [h]; congr⟩
end set
lemma finset.card_univ [fintype α] : (finset.univ : finset α).card = fintype.card α :=
rfl
lemma finset.eq_univ_of_card [fintype α] (s : finset α) (hs : s.card = fintype.card α) :
s = univ :=
eq_of_subset_of_card_le (subset_univ _) $ by rw [hs, finset.card_univ]
lemma finset.card_le_univ [fintype α] (s : finset α) :
s.card ≤ fintype.card α :=
card_le_of_subset (subset_univ s)
lemma finset.card_univ_diff [decidable_eq α] [fintype α] (s : finset α) :
(finset.univ \ s).card = fintype.card α - s.card :=
finset.card_sdiff (subset_univ s)
lemma finset.card_compl [decidable_eq α] [fintype α] (s : finset α) :
sᶜ.card = fintype.card α - s.card :=
finset.card_univ_diff s
instance (n : ℕ) : fintype (fin n) :=
⟨finset.fin_range n, finset.mem_fin_range⟩
lemma fin.univ_def (n : ℕ) : (univ : finset (fin n)) = finset.fin_range n := rfl
@[simp] theorem fintype.card_fin (n : ℕ) : fintype.card (fin n) = n :=
list.length_fin_range n
@[simp] lemma finset.card_fin (n : ℕ) : finset.card (finset.univ : finset (fin n)) = n :=
by rw [finset.card_univ, fintype.card_fin]
lemma fin.equiv_iff_eq {m n : ℕ} : nonempty (fin m ≃ fin n) ↔ m = n :=
⟨λ ⟨h⟩, by simpa using fintype.card_congr h, λ h, ⟨equiv.cast $ h ▸ rfl ⟩ ⟩
/-- Embed `fin n` into `fin (n + 1)` by prepending zero to the `univ` -/
lemma fin.univ_succ (n : ℕ) :
(univ : finset (fin (n + 1))) = insert 0 (univ.image fin.succ) :=
begin
ext m,
simp only [mem_univ, mem_insert, true_iff, mem_image, exists_prop],
exact fin.cases (or.inl rfl) (λ i, or.inr ⟨i, trivial, rfl⟩) m
end
/-- Embed `fin n` into `fin (n + 1)` by appending a new `fin.last n` to the `univ` -/
lemma fin.univ_cast_succ (n : ℕ) :
(univ : finset (fin (n + 1))) = insert (fin.last n) (univ.image fin.cast_succ) :=
begin
ext m,
simp only [mem_univ, mem_insert, true_iff, mem_image, exists_prop, true_and],
by_cases h : m.val < n,
{ right,
use fin.cast_lt m h,
rw fin.cast_succ_cast_lt },
{ left,
exact fin.eq_last_of_not_lt h }
end
/-- Embed `fin n` into `fin (n + 1)` by inserting
around a specified pivot `p : fin (n + 1)` into the `univ` -/
lemma fin.univ_succ_above (n : ℕ) (p : fin (n + 1)) :
(univ : finset (fin (n + 1))) = insert p (univ.image (fin.succ_above p)) :=
begin
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le (fin.le_last p) with hl|rfl,
{ ext m,
simp only [finset.mem_univ, finset.mem_insert, true_iff, finset.mem_image, exists_prop],
refine or_iff_not_imp_left.mpr _,
{ intro h,
use p.pred_above m h,
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, fin.succ_above_descend, and_self] } },
{ rw fin.succ_above_last,
exact fin.univ_cast_succ n }
end
@[instance, priority 10] def unique.fintype {α : Type*} [unique α] : fintype α :=
fintype.of_subsingleton (default α)
@[simp] lemma univ_unique {α : Type*} [unique α] [f : fintype α] : @finset.univ α _ = {default α} :=
by rw [subsingleton.elim f (@unique.fintype α _)]; refl
instance : fintype empty := ⟨∅, empty.rec _⟩
@[simp] theorem fintype.univ_empty : @univ empty _ = ∅ := rfl
@[simp] theorem fintype.card_empty : fintype.card empty = 0 := rfl
instance : fintype pempty := ⟨∅, pempty.rec _⟩
@[simp] theorem fintype.univ_pempty : @univ pempty _ = ∅ := rfl
@[simp] theorem fintype.card_pempty : fintype.card pempty = 0 := rfl
instance : fintype unit := fintype.of_subsingleton ()
theorem fintype.univ_unit : @univ unit _ = {()} := rfl
theorem fintype.card_unit : fintype.card unit = 1 := rfl
instance : fintype punit := fintype.of_subsingleton punit.star
@[simp] theorem fintype.univ_punit : @univ punit _ = {punit.star} := rfl
@[simp] theorem fintype.card_punit : fintype.card punit = 1 := rfl
instance : fintype bool := ⟨⟨tt ::ₘ ff ::ₘ 0, by simp⟩, λ x, by cases x; simp⟩
@[simp] theorem fintype.univ_bool : @univ bool _ = {tt, ff} := rfl
instance units_int.fintype : fintype (units ℤ) :=
⟨{1, -1}, λ x, by cases int.units_eq_one_or x; simp *⟩
instance additive.fintype : Π [fintype α], fintype (additive α) := id
instance multiplicative.fintype : Π [fintype α], fintype (multiplicative α) := id
@[simp] theorem fintype.card_units_int : fintype.card (units ℤ) = 2 := rfl
noncomputable instance [monoid α] [fintype α] : fintype (units α) :=
by classical; exact fintype.of_injective units.val units.ext
@[simp] theorem fintype.card_bool : fintype.card bool = 2 := rfl
/-- Given a finset on `α`, lift it to being a finset on `option α`
using `option.some` and then insert `option.none`. -/
def finset.insert_none (s : finset α) : finset (option α) :=
⟨none ::ₘ s.1.map some, multiset.nodup_cons.2
⟨by simp, multiset.nodup_map (λ a b, option.some.inj) s.2⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem finset.mem_insert_none {s : finset α} : ∀ {o : option α},
o ∈ s.insert_none ↔ ∀ a ∈ o, a ∈ s
| none := iff_of_true (multiset.mem_cons_self _ _) (λ a h, by cases h)
| (some a) := multiset.mem_cons.trans $ by simp; refl
theorem finset.some_mem_insert_none {s : finset α} {a : α} :
some a ∈ s.insert_none ↔ a ∈ s := by simp
instance {α : Type*} [fintype α] : fintype (option α) :=
⟨univ.insert_none, λ a, by simp⟩
@[simp] theorem fintype.card_option {α : Type*} [fintype α] :
fintype.card (option α) = fintype.card α + 1 :=
(multiset.card_cons _ _).trans (by rw multiset.card_map; refl)
instance {α : Type*} (β : α → Type*)
[fintype α] [∀ a, fintype (β a)] : fintype (sigma β) :=
⟨univ.sigma (λ _, univ), λ ⟨a, b⟩, by simp⟩
@[simp] lemma finset.univ_sigma_univ {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} [fintype α] [∀ a, fintype (β a)] :
(univ : finset α).sigma (λ a, (univ : finset (β a))) = univ := rfl
instance (α β : Type*) [fintype α] [fintype β] : fintype (α × β) :=
⟨univ.product univ, λ ⟨a, b⟩, by simp⟩
@[simp] lemma finset.univ_product_univ {α β : Type*} [fintype α] [fintype β] :
(univ : finset α).product (univ : finset β) = univ :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem fintype.card_prod (α β : Type*) [fintype α] [fintype β] :
fintype.card (α × β) = fintype.card α * fintype.card β :=
card_product _ _
/-- Given that `α × β` is a fintype, `α` is also a fintype. -/
def fintype.fintype_prod_left {α β} [decidable_eq α] [fintype (α × β)] [nonempty β] : fintype α :=
⟨(fintype.elems (α × β)).image prod.fst,
assume a, let ⟨b⟩ := ‹nonempty β› in by simp; exact ⟨b, fintype.complete _⟩⟩
/-- Given that `α × β` is a fintype, `β` is also a fintype. -/
def fintype.fintype_prod_right {α β} [decidable_eq β] [fintype (α × β)] [nonempty α] : fintype β :=
⟨(fintype.elems (α × β)).image prod.snd,
assume b, let ⟨a⟩ := ‹nonempty α› in by simp; exact ⟨a, fintype.complete _⟩⟩
instance (α : Type*) [fintype α] : fintype (ulift α) :=
fintype.of_equiv _ equiv.ulift.symm
@[simp] theorem fintype.card_ulift (α : Type*) [fintype α] :
fintype.card (ulift α) = fintype.card α :=
fintype.of_equiv_card _
instance (α : Type u) (β : Type v) [fintype α] [fintype β] : fintype (α ⊕ β) :=
@fintype.of_equiv _ _ (@sigma.fintype _
(λ b, cond b (ulift α) (ulift.{(max u v) v} β)) _
(λ b, by cases b; apply ulift.fintype))
((equiv.sum_equiv_sigma_bool _ _).symm.trans
(equiv.sum_congr equiv.ulift equiv.ulift))
namespace fintype
variables [fintype α] [fintype β]
lemma card_le_of_injective (f : α → β) (hf : function.injective f) : card α ≤ card β :=
finset.card_le_card_of_inj_on f (λ _ _, finset.mem_univ _) (λ _ _ _ _ h, hf h)
/--
The pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons and pigeonholes.
This is the `fintype` version of `finset.exists_ne_map_eq_of_card_lt_of_maps_to`.
-/
lemma exists_ne_map_eq_of_card_lt (f : α → β) (h : fintype.card β < fintype.card α) :
∃ x y, x ≠ y ∧ f x = f y :=
let ⟨x, _, y, _, h⟩ := finset.exists_ne_map_eq_of_card_lt_of_maps_to h (λ x _, mem_univ (f x))
in ⟨x, y, h⟩
lemma card_eq_one_iff : card α = 1 ↔ (∃ x : α, ∀ y, y = x) :=
by rw [← card_unit, card_eq]; exact
⟨λ ⟨a⟩, ⟨a.symm (), λ y, a.injective (subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩,
λ ⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨⟨λ _, (), λ _, x, λ _, (hx _).trans (hx _).symm,
λ _, subsingleton.elim _ _⟩⟩⟩
lemma card_eq_zero_iff : card α = 0 ↔ (α → false) :=
⟨λ h a, have e : α ≃ empty := classical.choice (card_eq.1 (by simp [h])), (e a).elim,
λ h, have e : α ≃ empty := ⟨λ a, (h a).elim, λ a, a.elim, λ a, (h a).elim, λ a, a.elim⟩,
by simp [card_congr e]⟩
/-- A `fintype` with cardinality zero is (constructively) equivalent to `pempty`. -/
def card_eq_zero_equiv_equiv_pempty :
card α = 0 ≃ (α ≃ pempty.{v+1}) :=
{ to_fun := λ h,
{ to_fun := λ a, false.elim (card_eq_zero_iff.1 h a),
inv_fun := λ a, pempty.elim a,
left_inv := λ a, false.elim (card_eq_zero_iff.1 h a),
right_inv := λ a, pempty.elim a, },
inv_fun := λ e,
by { simp only [←of_equiv_card e], convert card_pempty, },
left_inv := λ h, rfl,
right_inv := λ e, by { ext x, cases e x, } }
lemma card_pos_iff : 0 < card α ↔ nonempty α :=
⟨λ h, classical.by_contradiction (λ h₁,
have card α = 0 := card_eq_zero_iff.2 (λ a, h₁ ⟨a⟩),
lt_irrefl 0 $ by rwa this at h),
λ ⟨a⟩, nat.pos_of_ne_zero (mt card_eq_zero_iff.1 (λ h, h a))⟩
lemma card_le_one_iff : card α ≤ 1 ↔ (∀ a b : α, a = b) :=
let n := card α in
have hn : n = card α := rfl,
match n, hn with
| 0 := λ ha, ⟨λ h, λ a, (card_eq_zero_iff.1 ha.symm a).elim, λ _, ha ▸ nat.le_succ _⟩
| 1 := λ ha, ⟨λ h, λ a b, let ⟨x, hx⟩ := card_eq_one_iff.1 ha.symm in
by rw [hx a, hx b],
λ _, ha ▸ le_refl _⟩
| (n+2) := λ ha, ⟨λ h, by rw ← ha at h; exact absurd h dec_trivial,
(λ h, card_unit ▸ card_le_of_injective (λ _, ())
(λ _ _ _, h _ _))⟩
end
lemma card_le_one_iff_subsingleton : card α ≤ 1 ↔ subsingleton α :=
iff.trans card_le_one_iff subsingleton_iff.symm
lemma one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial : 1 < card α ↔ nontrivial α :=
begin
classical,
rw ← not_iff_not,
push_neg,
rw [not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, card_le_one_iff_subsingleton]
end
lemma exists_ne_of_one_lt_card (h : 1 < card α) (a : α) : ∃ b : α, b ≠ a :=
by { haveI : nontrivial α := one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial.1 h, exact exists_ne a }
lemma exists_pair_of_one_lt_card (h : 1 < card α) : ∃ (a b : α), a ≠ b :=
by { haveI : nontrivial α := one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial.1 h, exact exists_pair_ne α }
lemma injective_iff_surjective {f : α → α} : injective f ↔ surjective f :=
by haveI := classical.prop_decidable; exact
have ∀ {f : α → α}, injective f → surjective f,
from λ f hinj x,
have h₁ : image f univ = univ := eq_of_subset_of_card_le (subset_univ _)
((card_image_of_injective univ hinj).symm ▸ le_refl _),
have h₂ : x ∈ image f univ := h₁.symm ▸ mem_univ _,
exists_of_bex (mem_image.1 h₂),
⟨this,
λ hsurj, has_left_inverse.injective
⟨surj_inv hsurj, left_inverse_of_surjective_of_right_inverse
(this (injective_surj_inv _)) (right_inverse_surj_inv _)⟩⟩
lemma injective_iff_bijective {f : α → α} : injective f ↔ bijective f :=
by simp [bijective, injective_iff_surjective]
lemma surjective_iff_bijective {f : α → α} : surjective f ↔ bijective f :=
by simp [bijective, injective_iff_surjective]
lemma injective_iff_surjective_of_equiv {β : Type*} {f : α → β} (e : α ≃ β) :
injective f ↔ surjective f :=
have injective (e.symm ∘ f) ↔ surjective (e.symm ∘ f), from injective_iff_surjective,
⟨λ hinj, by simpa [function.comp] using
e.surjective.comp (this.1 (e.symm.injective.comp hinj)),
λ hsurj, by simpa [function.comp] using
e.injective.comp (this.2 (e.symm.surjective.comp hsurj))⟩
lemma nonempty_equiv_of_card_eq (h : card α = card β) :
nonempty (α ≃ β) :=
begin
obtain ⟨m, ⟨f⟩⟩ := exists_equiv_fin α,
obtain ⟨n, ⟨g⟩⟩ := exists_equiv_fin β,
suffices : m = n,
{ subst this, exact ⟨f.trans g.symm⟩ },
calc m = card (fin m) : (card_fin m).symm
... = card α : card_congr f.symm
... = card β : h
... = card (fin n) : card_congr g
... = n : card_fin n
end
lemma bijective_iff_injective_and_card (f : α → β) :
bijective f ↔ injective f ∧ card α = card β :=
begin
split,
{ intro h, exact ⟨h.1, card_congr (equiv.of_bijective f h)⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨hf, h⟩,
refine ⟨hf, _⟩,
obtain ⟨e⟩ : nonempty (α ≃ β) := nonempty_equiv_of_card_eq h,
rwa ← injective_iff_surjective_of_equiv e }
end
lemma bijective_iff_surjective_and_card (f : α → β) :
bijective f ↔ surjective f ∧ card α = card β :=
begin
split,
{ intro h, exact ⟨h.2, card_congr (equiv.of_bijective f h)⟩, },
{ rintro ⟨hf, h⟩,
refine ⟨_, hf⟩,
obtain ⟨e⟩ : nonempty (α ≃ β) := nonempty_equiv_of_card_eq h,
rwa injective_iff_surjective_of_equiv e }
end
end fintype
lemma fintype.coe_image_univ [fintype α] [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} :
↑(finset.image f finset.univ) = set.range f :=
by { ext x, simp }
instance list.subtype.fintype [decidable_eq α] (l : list α) : fintype {x // x ∈ l} :=
fintype.of_list l.attach l.mem_attach
instance multiset.subtype.fintype [decidable_eq α] (s : multiset α) : fintype {x // x ∈ s} :=
fintype.of_multiset s.attach s.mem_attach
instance finset.subtype.fintype (s : finset α) : fintype {x // x ∈ s} :=
⟨s.attach, s.mem_attach⟩
instance finset_coe.fintype (s : finset α) : fintype (↑s : set α) :=
finset.subtype.fintype s
@[simp] lemma fintype.card_coe (s : finset α) :
fintype.card (↑s : set α) = s.card := card_attach
lemma finset.attach_eq_univ {s : finset α} : s.attach = finset.univ := rfl
lemma finset.card_le_one_iff {s : finset α} :
s.card ≤ 1 ↔ ∀ {x y}, x ∈ s → y ∈ s → x = y :=
begin
let t : set α := ↑s,
letI : fintype t := finset_coe.fintype s,
have : fintype.card t = s.card := fintype.card_coe s,
rw [← this, fintype.card_le_one_iff],
split,
{ assume H x y hx hy,
exact subtype.mk.inj (H ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩) },
{ assume H x y,
exact subtype.eq (H x.2 y.2) }
end
/-- A `finset` of a subsingleton type has cardinality at most one. -/
lemma finset.card_le_one_of_subsingleton [subsingleton α] (s : finset α) : s.card ≤ 1 :=
finset.card_le_one_iff.2 $ λ _ _ _ _, subsingleton.elim _ _
lemma finset.one_lt_card_iff {s : finset α} :
1 < s.card ↔ ∃ x y, (x ∈ s) ∧ (y ∈ s) ∧ x ≠ y :=
begin
classical,
rw ← not_iff_not,
push_neg,
simpa [or_iff_not_imp_left] using finset.card_le_one_iff
end
instance plift.fintype (p : Prop) [decidable p] : fintype (plift p) :=
⟨if h : p then {⟨h⟩} else ∅, λ ⟨h⟩, by simp [h]⟩
instance Prop.fintype : fintype Prop :=
⟨⟨true ::ₘ false ::ₘ 0, by simp [true_ne_false]⟩,
classical.cases (by simp) (by simp)⟩
instance subtype.fintype (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] [fintype α] : fintype {x // p x} :=
fintype.subtype (univ.filter p) (by simp)
/-- A set on a fintype, when coerced to a type, is a fintype. -/
def set_fintype {α} [fintype α] (s : set α) [decidable_pred s] : fintype s :=
subtype.fintype (λ x, x ∈ s)
namespace function.embedding
/-- An embedding from a `fintype` to itself can be promoted to an equivalence. -/
noncomputable def equiv_of_fintype_self_embedding {α : Type*} [fintype α] (e : α ↪ α) : α ≃ α :=
equiv.of_bijective e (fintype.injective_iff_bijective.1 e.2)
@[simp]
lemma equiv_of_fintype_self_embedding_to_embedding {α : Type*} [fintype α] (e : α ↪ α) :
e.equiv_of_fintype_self_embedding.to_embedding = e :=
by { ext, refl, }
end function.embedding
@[simp]
lemma finset.univ_map_embedding {α : Type*} [fintype α] (e : α ↪ α) :
univ.map e = univ :=
by rw [← e.equiv_of_fintype_self_embedding_to_embedding, univ_map_equiv_to_embedding]
namespace fintype
variables [decidable_eq α] [fintype α] {δ : α → Type*}
/-- Given for all `a : α` a finset `t a` of `δ a`, then one can define the
finset `fintype.pi_finset t` of all functions taking values in `t a` for all `a`. This is the
analogue of `finset.pi` where the base finset is `univ` (but formally they are not the same, as
there is an additional condition `i ∈ finset.univ` in the `finset.pi` definition). -/
def pi_finset (t : Πa, finset (δ a)) : finset (Πa, δ a) :=
(finset.univ.pi t).map ⟨λ f a, f a (mem_univ a), λ _ _, by simp [function.funext_iff]⟩
@[simp] lemma mem_pi_finset {t : Πa, finset (δ a)} {f : Πa, δ a} :
f ∈ pi_finset t ↔ (∀a, f a ∈ t a) :=
begin
split,
{ simp only [pi_finset, mem_map, and_imp, forall_prop_of_true, exists_prop, mem_univ,
exists_imp_distrib, mem_pi],
assume g hg hgf a,
rw ← hgf,
exact hg a },
{ simp only [pi_finset, mem_map, forall_prop_of_true, exists_prop, mem_univ, mem_pi],
assume hf,
exact ⟨λ a ha, f a, hf, rfl⟩ }
end
lemma pi_finset_subset (t₁ t₂ : Πa, finset (δ a)) (h : ∀ a, t₁ a ⊆ t₂ a) :
pi_finset t₁ ⊆ pi_finset t₂ :=
λ g hg, mem_pi_finset.2 $ λ a, h a $ mem_pi_finset.1 hg a
lemma pi_finset_disjoint_of_disjoint [∀ a, decidable_eq (δ a)]
(t₁ t₂ : Πa, finset (δ a)) {a : α} (h : disjoint (t₁ a) (t₂ a)) :
disjoint (pi_finset t₁) (pi_finset t₂) :=
disjoint_iff_ne.2 $ λ f₁ hf₁ f₂ hf₂ eq₁₂,
disjoint_iff_ne.1 h (f₁ a) (mem_pi_finset.1 hf₁ a) (f₂ a) (mem_pi_finset.1 hf₂ a) (congr_fun eq₁₂ a)
end fintype
/-! ### pi -/
/-- A dependent product of fintypes, indexed by a fintype, is a fintype. -/
instance pi.fintype {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*}
[decidable_eq α] [fintype α] [∀a, fintype (β a)] : fintype (Πa, β a) :=
⟨fintype.pi_finset (λ _, univ), by simp⟩
@[simp] lemma fintype.pi_finset_univ {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*}
[decidable_eq α] [fintype α] [∀a, fintype (β a)] :
fintype.pi_finset (λ a : α, (finset.univ : finset (β a))) = (finset.univ : finset (Π a, β a)) :=
rfl
instance d_array.fintype {n : ℕ} {α : fin n → Type*}
[∀n, fintype (α n)] : fintype (d_array n α) :=
fintype.of_equiv _ (equiv.d_array_equiv_fin _).symm
instance array.fintype {n : ℕ} {α : Type*} [fintype α] : fintype (array n α) :=
d_array.fintype
instance vector.fintype {α : Type*} [fintype α] {n : ℕ} : fintype (vector α n) :=
fintype.of_equiv _ (equiv.vector_equiv_fin _ _).symm
instance quotient.fintype [fintype α] (s : setoid α)
[decidable_rel ((≈) : α → α → Prop)] : fintype (quotient s) :=
fintype.of_surjective quotient.mk (λ x, quotient.induction_on x (λ x, ⟨x, rfl⟩))
instance finset.fintype [fintype α] : fintype (finset α) :=
⟨univ.powerset, λ x, finset.mem_powerset.2 (finset.subset_univ _)⟩
@[simp] lemma fintype.card_finset [fintype α] :
fintype.card (finset α) = 2 ^ (fintype.card α) :=
finset.card_powerset finset.univ
@[simp] lemma set.to_finset_univ [fintype α] :
(set.univ : set α).to_finset = finset.univ :=
by { ext, simp only [set.mem_univ, mem_univ, set.mem_to_finset] }
@[simp] lemma set.to_finset_empty [fintype α] :
(∅ : set α).to_finset = ∅ :=
by { ext, simp only [set.mem_empty_eq, set.mem_to_finset, not_mem_empty] }
theorem fintype.card_subtype_le [fintype α] (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] :
fintype.card {x // p x} ≤ fintype.card α :=
by rw fintype.subtype_card; exact card_le_of_subset (subset_univ _)
theorem fintype.card_subtype_lt [fintype α] {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{x : α} (hx : ¬ p x) : fintype.card {x // p x} < fintype.card α :=
by rw [fintype.subtype_card]; exact finset.card_lt_card
⟨subset_univ _, not_forall.2 ⟨x, by simp [hx]⟩⟩
instance psigma.fintype {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} [fintype α] [∀ a, fintype (β a)] :
fintype (Σ' a, β a) :=
fintype.of_equiv _ (equiv.psigma_equiv_sigma _).symm
instance psigma.fintype_prop_left {α : Prop} {β : α → Type*} [decidable α] [∀ a, fintype (β a)] :
fintype (Σ' a, β a) :=
if h : α then fintype.of_equiv (β h) ⟨λ x, ⟨h, x⟩, psigma.snd, λ _, rfl, λ ⟨_, _⟩, rfl⟩
else ⟨∅, λ x, h x.1⟩
instance psigma.fintype_prop_right {α : Type*} {β : α → Prop} [∀ a, decidable (β a)] [fintype α] :
fintype (Σ' a, β a) :=
fintype.of_equiv {a // β a} ⟨λ ⟨x, y⟩, ⟨x, y⟩, λ ⟨x, y⟩, ⟨x, y⟩, λ ⟨x, y⟩, rfl, λ ⟨x, y⟩, rfl⟩
instance psigma.fintype_prop_prop {α : Prop} {β : α → Prop} [decidable α] [∀ a, decidable (β a)] :
fintype (Σ' a, β a) :=
if h : ∃ a, β a then ⟨{⟨h.fst, h.snd⟩}, λ ⟨_, _⟩, by simp⟩ else ⟨∅, λ ⟨x, y⟩, h ⟨x, y⟩⟩
instance set.fintype [fintype α] : fintype (set α) :=
⟨(@finset.univ α _).powerset.map ⟨coe, coe_injective⟩, λ s, begin
classical, refine mem_map.2 ⟨finset.univ.filter s, mem_powerset.2 (subset_univ _), _⟩,
apply (coe_filter _).trans, rw [coe_univ, set.sep_univ], refl
end⟩
instance pfun_fintype (p : Prop) [decidable p] (α : p → Type*)
[Π hp, fintype (α hp)] : fintype (Π hp : p, α hp) :=
if hp : p then fintype.of_equiv (α hp) ⟨λ a _, a, λ f, f hp, λ _, rfl, λ _, rfl⟩
else ⟨singleton (λ h, (hp h).elim), by simp [hp, function.funext_iff]⟩
@[simp] lemma finset.univ_pi_univ {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*}
[decidable_eq α] [fintype α] [∀a, fintype (β a)] :
finset.univ.pi (λ a : α, (finset.univ : finset (β a))) = finset.univ :=
by { ext, simp }
lemma mem_image_univ_iff_mem_range
{α β : Type*} [fintype α] [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} {b : β} :
b ∈ univ.image f ↔ b ∈ set.range f :=
by simp
lemma card_lt_card_of_injective_of_not_mem
{α β : Type*} [fintype α] [fintype β] (f : α → β) (h : function.injective f)
{b : β} (w : b ∉ set.range f) : fintype.card α < fintype.card β :=
begin
classical,
calc
fintype.card α = (univ : finset α).card : rfl
... = (image f univ).card : (card_image_of_injective univ h).symm
... < (insert b (image f univ)).card :
card_lt_card (ssubset_insert (mt mem_image_univ_iff_mem_range.mp w))
... ≤ (univ : finset β).card : card_le_of_subset (subset_univ _)
... = fintype.card β : rfl
end
/-- An auxiliary function for `quotient.fin_choice`. Given a
collection of setoids indexed by a type `ι`, a (finite) list `l` of
indices, and a function that for each `i ∈ l` gives a term of the
corresponding quotient type, then there is a corresponding term in the
quotient of the product of the setoids indexed by `l`. -/
def quotient.fin_choice_aux {ι : Type*} [decidable_eq ι]
{α : ι → Type*} [S : ∀ i, setoid (α i)] :
Π (l : list ι), (Π i ∈ l, quotient (S i)) → @quotient (Π i ∈ l, α i) (by apply_instance)
| [] f := ⟦λ i, false.elim⟧
| (i::l) f := begin
refine quotient.lift_on₂ (f i (list.mem_cons_self _ _))
(quotient.fin_choice_aux l (λ j h, f j (list.mem_cons_of_mem _ h)))
_ _,
exact λ a l, ⟦λ j h,
if e : j = i then by rw e; exact a else
l _ (h.resolve_left e)⟧,
refine λ a₁ l₁ a₂ l₂ h₁ h₂, quotient.sound (λ j h, _),
by_cases e : j = i; simp [e],
{ subst j, exact h₁ },
{ exact h₂ _ _ }
end
theorem quotient.fin_choice_aux_eq {ι : Type*} [decidable_eq ι]
{α : ι → Type*} [S : ∀ i, setoid (α i)] :
∀ (l : list ι) (f : Π i ∈ l, α i), quotient.fin_choice_aux l (λ i h, ⟦f i h⟧) = ⟦f⟧
| [] f := quotient.sound (λ i h, h.elim)
| (i::l) f := begin
simp [quotient.fin_choice_aux, quotient.fin_choice_aux_eq l],
refine quotient.sound (λ j h, _),
by_cases e : j = i; simp [e],
subst j, refl
end
/-- Given a collection of setoids indexed by a fintype `ι` and a
function that for each `i : ι` gives a term of the corresponding
quotient type, then there is corresponding term in the quotient of the
product of the setoids. -/
def quotient.fin_choice {ι : Type*} [decidable_eq ι] [fintype ι]
{α : ι → Type*} [S : ∀ i, setoid (α i)]
(f : Π i, quotient (S i)) : @quotient (Π i, α i) (by apply_instance) :=
quotient.lift_on (@quotient.rec_on _ _ (λ l : multiset ι,
@quotient (Π i ∈ l, α i) (by apply_instance))
finset.univ.1
(λ l, quotient.fin_choice_aux l (λ i _, f i))
(λ a b h, begin
have := λ a, quotient.fin_choice_aux_eq a (λ i h, quotient.out (f i)),
simp [quotient.out_eq] at this,
simp [this],
let g := λ a:multiset ι, ⟦λ (i : ι) (h : i ∈ a), quotient.out (f i)⟧,
refine eq_of_heq ((eq_rec_heq _ _).trans (_ : g a == g b)),
congr' 1, exact quotient.sound h,
end))
(λ f, ⟦λ i, f i (finset.mem_univ _)⟧)
(λ a b h, quotient.sound $ λ i, h _ _)
theorem quotient.fin_choice_eq {ι : Type*} [decidable_eq ι] [fintype ι]
{α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, setoid (α i)]
(f : Π i, α i) : quotient.fin_choice (λ i, ⟦f i⟧) = ⟦f⟧ :=
begin
let q, swap, change quotient.lift_on q _ _ = _,
have : q = ⟦λ i h, f i⟧,
{ dsimp [q],
exact quotient.induction_on
(@finset.univ ι _).1 (λ l, quotient.fin_choice_aux_eq _ _) },
simp [this], exact setoid.refl _
end
section equiv
open list equiv equiv.perm
variables [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β]
/-- Given a list, produce a list of all permutations of its elements. -/
def perms_of_list : list α → list (perm α)
| [] := [1]
| (a :: l) := perms_of_list l ++ l.bind (λ b, (perms_of_list l).map (λ f, swap a b * f))
lemma length_perms_of_list : ∀ l : list α, length (perms_of_list l) = l.length!
| [] := rfl
| (a :: l) :=
begin
rw [length_cons, nat.factorial_succ],
simp [perms_of_list, length_bind, length_perms_of_list, function.comp, nat.succ_mul],
cc
end
lemma mem_perms_of_list_of_mem {l : list α} {f : perm α}
(h : ∀ x, f x ≠ x → x ∈ l) : f ∈ perms_of_list l :=
begin
induction l with a l IH generalizing f h,
{ exact list.mem_singleton.2 (equiv.ext $ λ x, decidable.by_contradiction $ h _) },
by_cases hfa : f a = a,
{ refine mem_append_left _ (IH (λ x hx, mem_of_ne_of_mem _ (h x hx))),
rintro rfl, exact hx hfa },
{ have hfa' : f (f a) ≠ f a := mt (λ h, f.injective h) hfa,
have : ∀ (x : α), (swap a (f a) * f) x ≠ x → x ∈ l,
{ intros x hx,
have hxa : x ≠ a,
{ rintro rfl, apply hx, simp only [mul_apply, swap_apply_right] },
refine list.mem_of_ne_of_mem hxa (h x (λ h, _)),
simp only [h, mul_apply, swap_apply_def, mul_apply, ne.def, apply_eq_iff_eq] at hx;
split_ifs at hx, exacts [hxa (h.symm.trans h_1), hx h] },
suffices : f ∈ perms_of_list l ∨ ∃ (b ∈ l) (g ∈ perms_of_list l), swap a b * g = f,
{ simpa only [perms_of_list, exists_prop, list.mem_map, mem_append, list.mem_bind] },
refine or_iff_not_imp_left.2 (λ hfl, ⟨f a, _, swap a (f a) * f, IH this, _⟩),
{ by_cases hffa : f (f a) = a,
{ exact mem_of_ne_of_mem hfa (h _ (mt (λ h, f.injective h) hfa)) },
{ apply this,
simp only [mul_apply, swap_apply_def, mul_apply, ne.def, apply_eq_iff_eq],
split_ifs; cc } },
{ rw [← mul_assoc, mul_def (swap a (f a)) (swap a (f a)),
swap_swap, ← equiv.perm.one_def, one_mul] } }
end
lemma mem_of_mem_perms_of_list : ∀ {l : list α} {f : perm α}, f ∈ perms_of_list l → ∀ {x}, f x ≠ x → x ∈ l
| [] f h := have f = 1 := by simpa [perms_of_list] using h, by rw this; simp
| (a::l) f h :=
(mem_append.1 h).elim
(λ h x hx, mem_cons_of_mem _ (mem_of_mem_perms_of_list h hx))
(λ h x hx,
let ⟨y, hy, hy'⟩ := list.mem_bind.1 h in
let ⟨g, hg₁, hg₂⟩ := list.mem_map.1 hy' in
if hxa : x = a then by simp [hxa]
else if hxy : x = y then mem_cons_of_mem _ $ by rwa hxy
else mem_cons_of_mem _ $
mem_of_mem_perms_of_list hg₁ $
by rw [eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq.2 hg₂, mul_apply, swap_inv, swap_apply_def];
split_ifs; cc)
lemma mem_perms_of_list_iff {l : list α} {f : perm α} : f ∈ perms_of_list l ↔ ∀ {x}, f x ≠ x → x ∈ l :=
⟨mem_of_mem_perms_of_list, mem_perms_of_list_of_mem⟩
lemma nodup_perms_of_list : ∀ {l : list α} (hl : l.nodup), (perms_of_list l).nodup
| [] hl := by simp [perms_of_list]
| (a::l) hl :=
have hl' : l.nodup, from nodup_of_nodup_cons hl,
have hln' : (perms_of_list l).nodup, from nodup_perms_of_list hl',
have hmeml : ∀ {f : perm α}, f ∈ perms_of_list l → f a = a,
from λ f hf, not_not.1 (mt (mem_of_mem_perms_of_list hf) (nodup_cons.1 hl).1),
by rw [perms_of_list, list.nodup_append, list.nodup_bind, pairwise_iff_nth_le]; exact
⟨hln', ⟨λ _ _, nodup_map (λ _ _, mul_left_cancel) hln',
λ i j hj hij x hx₁ hx₂,
let ⟨f, hf⟩ := list.mem_map.1 hx₁ in
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := list.mem_map.1 hx₂ in
have hix : x a = nth_le l i (lt_trans hij hj),
by rw [← hf.2, mul_apply, hmeml hf.1, swap_apply_left],
have hiy : x a = nth_le l j hj,
by rw [← hg.2, mul_apply, hmeml hg.1, swap_apply_left],
absurd (hf.2.trans (hg.2.symm)) $
λ h, ne_of_lt hij $ nodup_iff_nth_le_inj.1 hl' i j (lt_trans hij hj) hj $
by rw [← hix, hiy]⟩,
λ f hf₁ hf₂,
let ⟨x, hx, hx'⟩ := list.mem_bind.1 hf₂ in
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := list.mem_map.1 hx' in
have hgxa : g⁻¹ x = a, from f.injective $
by rw [hmeml hf₁, ← hg.2]; simp,
have hxa : x ≠ a, from λ h, (list.nodup_cons.1 hl).1 (h ▸ hx),
(list.nodup_cons.1 hl).1 $
hgxa ▸ mem_of_mem_perms_of_list hg.1 (by rwa [apply_inv_self, hgxa])⟩
/-- Given a finset, produce the finset of all permutations of its elements. -/
def perms_of_finset (s : finset α) : finset (perm α) :=
quotient.hrec_on s.1 (λ l hl, ⟨perms_of_list l, nodup_perms_of_list hl⟩)
(λ a b hab, hfunext (congr_arg _ (quotient.sound hab))
(λ ha hb _, heq_of_eq $ finset.ext $
by simp [mem_perms_of_list_iff, hab.mem_iff]))
s.2
lemma mem_perms_of_finset_iff : ∀ {s : finset α} {f : perm α},
f ∈ perms_of_finset s ↔ ∀ {x}, f x ≠ x → x ∈ s :=
by rintros ⟨⟨l⟩, hs⟩ f; exact mem_perms_of_list_iff
lemma card_perms_of_finset : ∀ (s : finset α),
(perms_of_finset s).card = s.card! :=
by rintros ⟨⟨l⟩, hs⟩; exact length_perms_of_list l
/-- The collection of permutations of a fintype is a fintype. -/
def fintype_perm [fintype α] : fintype (perm α) :=
⟨perms_of_finset (@finset.univ α _), by simp [mem_perms_of_finset_iff]⟩
instance [fintype α] [fintype β] : fintype (α ≃ β) :=
if h : fintype.card β = fintype.card α
then trunc.rec_on_subsingleton (fintype.equiv_fin α)
(λ eα, trunc.rec_on_subsingleton (fintype.equiv_fin β)
(λ eβ, @fintype.of_equiv _ (perm α) fintype_perm
(equiv_congr (equiv.refl α) (eα.trans (eq.rec_on h eβ.symm)) : (α ≃ α) ≃ (α ≃ β))))
else ⟨∅, λ x, false.elim (h (fintype.card_eq.2 ⟨x.symm⟩))⟩
lemma fintype.card_perm [fintype α] : fintype.card (perm α) = (fintype.card α)! :=
subsingleton.elim (@fintype_perm α _ _) (@equiv.fintype α α _ _ _ _) ▸
card_perms_of_finset _
lemma fintype.card_equiv [fintype α] [fintype β] (e : α ≃ β) :
fintype.card (α ≃ β) = (fintype.card α)! :=
fintype.card_congr (equiv_congr (equiv.refl α) e) ▸ fintype.card_perm
lemma univ_eq_singleton_of_card_one {α} [fintype α] (x : α) (h : fintype.card α = 1) :
(univ : finset α) = {x} :=
begin
apply symm,
apply eq_of_subset_of_card_le (subset_univ ({x})),
apply le_of_eq,
simp [h, finset.card_univ]
end
end equiv
namespace fintype
section choose
open fintype
open equiv
variables [fintype α] (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p]
/-- Given a fintype `α` and a predicate `p`, associate to a proof that there is a unique element of
`α` satisfying `p` this unique element, as an element of the corresponding subtype. -/
def choose_x (hp : ∃! a : α, p a) : {a // p a} :=
⟨finset.choose p univ (by simp; exact hp), finset.choose_property _ _ _⟩
/-- Given a fintype `α` and a predicate `p`, associate to a proof that there is a unique element of
`α` satisfying `p` this unique element, as an element of `α`. -/
def choose (hp : ∃! a, p a) : α := choose_x p hp
lemma choose_spec (hp : ∃! a, p a) : p (choose p hp) :=
(choose_x p hp).property
end choose
section bijection_inverse
open function
variables [fintype α]
variables [decidable_eq β]
variables {f : α → β}
/-- `
`bij_inv f` is the unique inverse to a bijection `f`. This acts
as a computable alternative to `function.inv_fun`. -/
def bij_inv (f_bij : bijective f) (b : β) : α :=
fintype.choose (λ a, f a = b)
begin
rcases f_bij.right b with ⟨a', fa_eq_b⟩,
rw ← fa_eq_b,
exact ⟨a', ⟨rfl, (λ a h, f_bij.left h)⟩⟩
end
lemma left_inverse_bij_inv (f_bij : bijective f) : left_inverse (bij_inv f_bij) f :=
λ a, f_bij.left (choose_spec (λ a', f a' = f a) _)
lemma right_inverse_bij_inv (f_bij : bijective f) : right_inverse (bij_inv f_bij) f :=
λ b, choose_spec (λ a', f a' = b) _
lemma bijective_bij_inv (f_bij : bijective f) : bijective (bij_inv f_bij) :=
⟨(right_inverse_bij_inv _).injective, (left_inverse_bij_inv _).surjective⟩
end bijection_inverse
lemma well_founded_of_trans_of_irrefl [fintype α] (r : α → α → Prop)
[is_trans α r] [is_irrefl α r] : well_founded r :=
by classical; exact
have ∀ x y, r x y → (univ.filter (λ z, r z x)).card < (univ.filter (λ z, r z y)).card,
from λ x y hxy, finset.card_lt_card $
by simp only [finset.lt_iff_ssubset.symm, lt_iff_le_not_le,
finset.le_iff_subset, finset.subset_iff, mem_filter, true_and, mem_univ, hxy];
exact ⟨λ z hzx, trans hzx hxy, not_forall_of_exists_not ⟨x, not_imp.2 ⟨hxy, irrefl x⟩⟩⟩,
subrelation.wf this (measure_wf _)
lemma preorder.well_founded [fintype α] [preorder α] : well_founded ((<) : α → α → Prop) :=
well_founded_of_trans_of_irrefl _
@[instance, priority 10] lemma linear_order.is_well_order [fintype α] [linear_order α] :
is_well_order α (<) :=
{ wf := preorder.well_founded }
end fintype
/-- A type is said to be infinite if it has no fintype instance. -/
class infinite (α : Type*) : Prop :=
(not_fintype : fintype α → false)
@[simp] lemma not_nonempty_fintype {α : Type*} : ¬nonempty (fintype α) ↔ infinite α :=
⟨λf, ⟨λ x, f ⟨x⟩⟩, λ⟨f⟩ ⟨x⟩, f x⟩
lemma finset.exists_minimal {α : Type*} [preorder α] (s : finset α) (h : s.nonempty) :
∃ m ∈ s, ∀ x ∈ s, ¬ (x < m) :=
begin
obtain ⟨c, hcs : c ∈ s⟩ := h,
have : well_founded (@has_lt.lt {x // x ∈ s} _) := fintype.well_founded_of_trans_of_irrefl _,
obtain ⟨⟨m, hms : m ∈ s⟩, -, H⟩ := this.has_min set.univ ⟨⟨c, hcs⟩, trivial⟩,
exact ⟨m, hms, λ x hx hxm, H ⟨x, hx⟩ trivial hxm⟩,
end
lemma finset.exists_maximal {α : Type*} [preorder α] (s : finset α) (h : s.nonempty) :
∃ m ∈ s, ∀ x ∈ s, ¬ (m < x) :=
@finset.exists_minimal (order_dual α) _ s h
namespace infinite
lemma exists_not_mem_finset [infinite α] (s : finset α) : ∃ x, x ∉ s :=
not_forall.1 $ λ h, not_fintype ⟨s, h⟩
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (α : Type*) [H : infinite α] : nontrivial α :=
⟨let ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_not_mem_finset (∅ : finset α) in
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := exists_not_mem_finset ({x} : finset α) in
⟨y, x, by simpa only [mem_singleton] using hy⟩⟩
lemma nonempty (α : Type*) [infinite α] : nonempty α :=
by apply_instance
lemma of_injective [infinite β] (f : β → α) (hf : injective f) : infinite α :=
⟨λ I, by exactI not_fintype (fintype.of_injective f hf)⟩
lemma of_surjective [infinite β] (f : α → β) (hf : surjective f) : infinite α :=
⟨λ I, by classical; exactI not_fintype (fintype.of_surjective f hf)⟩
private noncomputable def nat_embedding_aux (α : Type*) [infinite α] : ℕ → α
| n := by letI := classical.dec_eq α; exact classical.some (exists_not_mem_finset
((multiset.range n).pmap (λ m (hm : m < n), nat_embedding_aux m)
(λ _, multiset.mem_range.1)).to_finset)
private lemma nat_embedding_aux_injective (α : Type*) [infinite α] :
function.injective (nat_embedding_aux α) :=
begin
assume m n h,
letI := classical.dec_eq α,
wlog hmlen : m ≤ n using m n,
by_contradiction hmn,
have hmn : m < n, from lt_of_le_of_ne hmlen hmn,
refine (classical.some_spec (exists_not_mem_finset
((multiset.range n).pmap (λ m (hm : m < n), nat_embedding_aux α m)
(λ _, multiset.mem_range.1)).to_finset)) _,
refine multiset.mem_to_finset.2 (multiset.mem_pmap.2
⟨m, multiset.mem_range.2 hmn, _⟩),
rw [h, nat_embedding_aux]
end
/-- Embedding of `ℕ` into an infinite type. -/
noncomputable def nat_embedding (α : Type*) [infinite α] : ℕ ↪ α :=
⟨_, nat_embedding_aux_injective α⟩
lemma exists_subset_card_eq (α : Type*) [infinite α] (n : ℕ) :
∃ s : finset α, s.card = n :=
⟨(range n).map (nat_embedding α), by rw [card_map, card_range]⟩
end infinite
lemma not_injective_infinite_fintype [infinite α] [fintype β] (f : α → β) :
¬ injective f :=
assume (hf : injective f),
have H : fintype α := fintype.of_injective f hf,
infinite.not_fintype H
/--
The pigeonhole principle for infinitely many pigeons in finitely many
pigeonholes. If there are infinitely many pigeons in finitely many
pigeonholes, then there are at least two pigeons in the same
pigeonhole.
See also: `fintype.exists_ne_map_eq_of_card_lt`, `fintype.exists_infinite_fiber`.
-/
lemma fintype.exists_ne_map_eq_of_infinite [infinite α] [fintype β] (f : α → β) :
∃ x y : α, x ≠ y ∧ f x = f y :=
begin
classical, by_contra hf, push_neg at hf,
apply not_injective_infinite_fintype f,
intros x y, contrapose, apply hf,
end
/--
The strong pigeonhole principle for infinitely many pigeons in
finitely many pigeonholes. If there are infinitely many pigeons in
finitely many pigeonholes, then there is a pigeonhole with infinitely
many pigeons.
See also: `fintype.exists_ne_map_eq_of_infinite`
-/
lemma fintype.exists_infinite_fiber [infinite α] [fintype β] (f : α → β) :
∃ y : β, infinite (f ⁻¹' {y}) :=
begin
classical, by_contra hf, push_neg at hf,
haveI h' : ∀ (y : β), fintype (f ⁻¹' {y}) := begin
intro y, specialize hf y,
rw [←not_nonempty_fintype, not_not] at hf,
exact classical.choice hf,
end,
let key : fintype α :=
{ elems := univ.bind (λ (y : β), (f ⁻¹' {y}).to_finset),
complete := by simp },
exact infinite.not_fintype key,
end
lemma not_surjective_fintype_infinite [fintype α] [infinite β] (f : α → β) :
¬ surjective f :=
assume (hf : surjective f),
have H : infinite α := infinite.of_surjective f hf,
@infinite.not_fintype _ H infer_instance
instance nat.infinite : infinite ℕ :=
⟨λ ⟨s, hs⟩, finset.not_mem_range_self $ s.subset_range_sup_succ (hs _)⟩
instance int.infinite : infinite ℤ :=
infinite.of_injective int.of_nat (λ _ _, int.of_nat.inj)
section trunc
/--
For `s : multiset α`, we can lift the existential statement that `∃ x, x ∈ s` to a `trunc α`.
-/
def trunc_of_multiset_exists_mem {α} (s : multiset α) : (∃ x, x ∈ s) → trunc α :=
quotient.rec_on_subsingleton s $ λ l h,
match l, h with
| [], _ := false.elim (by tauto)
| (a :: _), _ := trunc.mk a
end
/--
A `nonempty` `fintype` constructively contains an element.
-/
def trunc_of_nonempty_fintype (α) [nonempty α] [fintype α] : trunc α :=
trunc_of_multiset_exists_mem finset.univ.val (by simp)
/--
A `fintype` with positive cardinality constructively contains an element.
-/
def trunc_of_card_pos {α} [fintype α] (h : 0 < fintype.card α) : trunc α :=
by { letI := (fintype.card_pos_iff.mp h), exact trunc_of_nonempty_fintype α }
/--
By iterating over the elements of a fintype, we can lift an existential statement `∃ a, P a`
to `trunc (Σ' a, P a)`, containing data.
-/
def trunc_sigma_of_exists {α} [fintype α] {P : α → Prop} [decidable_pred P] (h : ∃ a, P a) :
trunc (Σ' a, P a) :=
@trunc_of_nonempty_fintype (Σ' a, P a) (exists.elim h $ λ a ha, ⟨⟨a, ha⟩⟩) _
end trunc
|
59d5e7be1b1314174968d8fa83ab486c5c56adb5 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /src/Init/Data/Hashable.lean | 0b4e65bf067605685e95387ae303f854a1747e3c | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,561 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.UInt.Basic
import Init.Data.String
universe u
instance : Hashable Nat where
hash n := UInt64.ofNat n
instance : Hashable String.Pos where
hash p := UInt64.ofNat p.byteIdx
instance [Hashable α] [Hashable β] : Hashable (α × β) where
hash | (a, b) => mixHash (hash a) (hash b)
instance : Hashable Bool where
hash
| true => 11
| false => 13
instance [Hashable α] : Hashable (Option α) where
hash
| none => 11
| some a => mixHash (hash a) 13
instance [Hashable α] : Hashable (List α) where
hash as := as.foldl (fun r a => mixHash r (hash a)) 7
instance [Hashable α] : Hashable (Array α) where
hash as := as.foldl (fun r a => mixHash r (hash a)) 7
instance : Hashable UInt8 where
hash n := n.toUInt64
instance : Hashable UInt16 where
hash n := n.toUInt64
instance : Hashable UInt32 where
hash n := n.toUInt64
instance : Hashable UInt64 where
hash n := n
instance : Hashable USize where
hash n := n.toUInt64
instance : Hashable (Fin n) where
hash v := v.val.toUInt64
instance : Hashable Int where
hash
| Int.ofNat n => UInt64.ofNat (2 * n)
| Int.negSucc n => UInt64.ofNat (2 * n + 1)
instance (P : Prop) : Hashable P where
hash _ := 0
/-- An opaque (low-level) hash operation used to implement hashing for pointers. -/
@[always_inline, inline] def hash64 (u : UInt64) : UInt64 :=
mixHash u 11
|
b9ef8adbdc48c00d048023e836911c626772a2ea | 5412d79aa1dc0b521605c38bef9f0d4557b5a29d | /stage0/src/Lean/Elab/Tactic/Basic.lean | 8b3b9fc7d025358f9ca2a7bec07da57a37d9a37d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | smunix/lean4 | a450ec0927dc1c74816a1bf2818bf8600c9fc9bf | 3407202436c141e3243eafbecb4b8720599b970a | refs/heads/master | 1,676,334,875,188 | 1,610,128,510,000 | 1,610,128,521,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 17,028 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Sebastian Ullrich
-/
import Lean.Util.CollectMVars
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Assumption
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Intro
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Clear
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Revert
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Subst
import Lean.Elab.Util
import Lean.Elab.Term
import Lean.Elab.Binders
namespace Lean.Elab
open Meta
def goalsToMessageData (goals : List MVarId) : MessageData :=
MessageData.joinSep (goals.map $ MessageData.ofGoal) m!"\n\n"
def Term.reportUnsolvedGoals (goals : List MVarId) : TermElabM Unit := do
throwError! "unsolved goals\n{goalsToMessageData goals}"
namespace Tactic
structure Context where
main : MVarId
structure State where
goals : List MVarId
deriving Inhabited
structure BacktrackableState where
env : Environment
mctx : MetavarContext
term : Term.State
goals : List MVarId
abbrev TacticM := ReaderT Context $ StateRefT State TermElabM
abbrev Tactic := Syntax → TacticM Unit
def saveBacktrackableState : TacticM BacktrackableState := do
pure { env := (← getEnv), mctx := (← getMCtx), term := (← getThe Term.State), goals := (← get).goals }
def BacktrackableState.restore (b : BacktrackableState) : TacticM Unit := do
setEnv b.env
setMCtx b.mctx
let msgLog ← Term.getMessageLog -- we do not backtrack the message log
set b.term
Term.setMessageLog msgLog
modify fun s => { s with goals := b.goals }
@[inline] protected def tryCatch {α} (x : TacticM α) (h : Exception → TacticM α) : TacticM α := do
let b ← saveBacktrackableState
try x catch ex => b.restore; h ex
instance : MonadExcept Exception TacticM where
throw := throw
tryCatch := Tactic.tryCatch
@[inline] protected def orElse {α} (x y : TacticM α) : TacticM α := do
try x catch _ => y
instance {α} : OrElse (TacticM α) where
orElse := Tactic.orElse
structure SavedState where
core : Core.State
meta : Meta.State
term : Term.State
tactic : State
deriving Inhabited
def saveAllState : TacticM SavedState := do
pure { core := (← getThe Core.State), meta := (← getThe Meta.State), term := (← getThe Term.State), tactic := (← get) }
def SavedState.restore (s : SavedState) : TacticM Unit := do
set s.core; set s.meta; set s.term; set s.tactic
@[inline] def liftTermElabM {α} (x : TermElabM α) : TacticM α := liftM x
@[inline] def liftMetaM {α} (x : MetaM α) : TacticM α := liftTermElabM $ Term.liftMetaM x
def ensureHasType (expectedType? : Option Expr) (e : Expr) : TacticM Expr := liftTermElabM $ Term.ensureHasType expectedType? e
def reportUnsolvedGoals (goals : List MVarId) : TacticM Unit := liftTermElabM $ Term.reportUnsolvedGoals goals
protected def getCurrMacroScope : TacticM MacroScope := do pure (← readThe Term.Context).currMacroScope
protected def getMainModule : TacticM Name := do pure (← getEnv).mainModule
unsafe def mkTacticAttribute : IO (KeyedDeclsAttribute Tactic) :=
mkElabAttribute Tactic `Lean.Elab.Tactic.tacticElabAttribute `builtinTactic `tactic `Lean.Parser.Tactic `Lean.Elab.Tactic.Tactic "tactic"
@[builtinInit mkTacticAttribute] constant tacticElabAttribute : KeyedDeclsAttribute Tactic
private def evalTacticUsing (s : SavedState) (stx : Syntax) (tactics : List Tactic) : TacticM Unit := do
let rec loop : List Tactic → TacticM Unit
| [] => throwErrorAt! stx "unexpected syntax {indentD stx}"
| evalFn::evalFns => do
try
evalFn stx
catch
| ex@(Exception.error _ _) =>
match evalFns with
| [] => throw ex
| evalFns => s.restore; loop evalFns
| ex@(Exception.internal id _) =>
if id == unsupportedSyntaxExceptionId then
s.restore; loop evalFns
else
throw ex
loop tactics
/- Elaborate `x` with `stx` on the macro stack -/
@[inline]
def withMacroExpansion {α} (beforeStx afterStx : Syntax) (x : TacticM α) : TacticM α :=
withTheReader Term.Context (fun ctx => { ctx with macroStack := { before := beforeStx, after := afterStx } :: ctx.macroStack }) x
mutual
partial def expandTacticMacroFns (stx : Syntax) (macros : List Macro) : TacticM Unit :=
let rec loop : List Macro → TacticM Unit
| [] => throwErrorAt! stx "tactic '{stx.getKind}' has not been implemented"
| m::ms => do
let scp ← getCurrMacroScope
try
let stx' ← adaptMacro m stx
evalTactic stx'
catch ex =>
if ms.isEmpty then throw ex
loop ms
loop macros
partial def expandTacticMacro (stx : Syntax) : TacticM Unit := do
let k := stx.getKind
let table := (macroAttribute.ext.getState (← getEnv)).table
let macroFns := (table.find? k).getD []
expandTacticMacroFns stx macroFns
partial def evalTactic : Syntax → TacticM Unit
| stx => withRef stx $ withIncRecDepth $ withFreshMacroScope $ match stx with
| Syntax.node k args =>
if k == nullKind then
-- Macro writers create a sequence of tactics `t₁ ... tₙ` using `mkNullNode #[t₁, ..., tₙ]`
stx.getArgs.forM evalTactic
else do
trace `Elab.step fun _ => stx
let env ← getEnv
let s ← saveAllState
let table := (tacticElabAttribute.ext.getState env).table
let k := stx.getKind
match table.find? k with
| some evalFns => evalTacticUsing s stx evalFns
| none => expandTacticMacro stx
| _ => throwError "unexpected command"
end
/-- Adapt a syntax transformation to a regular tactic evaluator. -/
def adaptExpander (exp : Syntax → TacticM Syntax) : Tactic := fun stx => do
let stx' ← exp stx
withMacroExpansion stx stx' $ evalTactic stx'
def getGoals : TacticM (List MVarId) := do pure (← get).goals
def setGoals (gs : List MVarId) : TacticM Unit := modify $ fun s => { s with goals := gs }
def appendGoals (gs : List MVarId) : TacticM Unit := modify $ fun s => { s with goals := s.goals ++ gs }
def pruneSolvedGoals : TacticM Unit := do
let gs ← getGoals
let gs ← gs.filterM fun g => not <$> isExprMVarAssigned g
setGoals gs
def getUnsolvedGoals : TacticM (List MVarId) := do pruneSolvedGoals; getGoals
def getMainGoal : TacticM (MVarId × List MVarId) := do let (g::gs) ← getUnsolvedGoals | throwError "no goals to be solved"; pure (g, gs)
def getMainTag : TacticM Name := do
let (g, _) ← getMainGoal
pure (← getMVarDecl g).userName
def ensureHasNoMVars (e : Expr) : TacticM Unit := do
let e ← instantiateMVars e
let pendingMVars ← getMVars e
discard <| Term.logUnassignedUsingErrorInfos pendingMVars
if e.hasExprMVar then
throwError! "tactic failed, resulting expression contains metavariables{indentExpr e}"
def withMainMVarContext {α} (x : TacticM α) : TacticM α := do
let (mvarId, _) ← getMainGoal
withMVarContext mvarId x
@[inline] def liftMetaMAtMain {α} (x : MVarId → MetaM α) : TacticM α := do
let (g, _) ← getMainGoal
withMVarContext g $ liftMetaM $ x g
@[inline] def liftMetaTacticAux {α} (tactic : MVarId → MetaM (α × List MVarId)) : TacticM α := do
let (g, gs) ← getMainGoal
withMVarContext g do
let (a, gs') ← tactic g
setGoals (gs' ++ gs)
pure a
@[inline] def liftMetaTactic (tactic : MVarId → MetaM (List MVarId)) : TacticM Unit :=
liftMetaTacticAux fun mvarId => do
let gs ← tactic mvarId
pure ((), gs)
def done : TacticM Unit := do
let gs ← getUnsolvedGoals;
unless gs.isEmpty do
reportUnsolvedGoals gs
@[builtinTactic Lean.Parser.Tactic.«done»] def evalDone : Tactic := fun _ => done
def focus {α} (tactic : TacticM α) : TacticM α := do
let (g, gs) ← getMainGoal
setGoals [g]
let a ← tactic
let gs' ← getGoals
setGoals (gs' ++ gs)
pure a
def focusAndDone {α} (tactic : TacticM α) : TacticM α :=
focus do let a ← tactic; done; pure a
/- Close the main goal using the given tactic. If it fails, log the error and `admit` -/
def closeUsingOrAdmit (tac : Syntax) : TacticM Unit := do
let (mvarId, rest) ← getMainGoal
try
evalTactic tac
done
catch ex =>
logException ex
let mvarType ← inferType (mkMVar mvarId)
assignExprMVar mvarId (← mkSorry mvarType (synthetic := true))
setGoals rest
def try? {α} (tactic : TacticM α) : TacticM (Option α) := do
try pure (some (← tactic))
catch _ => pure none
-- TODO: rename?
def «try» {α} (tactic : TacticM α) : TacticM Bool := do
try
discard tactic
pure true
catch _ =>
pure false
/--
Use `parentTag` to tag untagged goals at `newGoals`.
If there are multiple new untagged goals, they are named using `<parentTag>.<newSuffix>_<idx>` where `idx > 0`.
If there is only one new untagged goal, then we just use `parentTag` -/
def tagUntaggedGoals (parentTag : Name) (newSuffix : Name) (newGoals : List MVarId) : TacticM Unit := do
let mctx ← getMCtx
let mut numAnonymous := 0
for g in newGoals do
if mctx.isAnonymousMVar g then
numAnonymous := numAnonymous + 1
modifyMCtx fun mctx => do
let mut mctx := mctx
let mut idx := 1
for g in newGoals do
if mctx.isAnonymousMVar g then
if numAnonymous == 1 then
mctx := mctx.renameMVar g parentTag
else
mctx := mctx.renameMVar g (parentTag ++ newSuffix.appendIndexAfter idx)
idx := idx + 1
pure mctx
@[builtinTactic seq1] def evalSeq1 : Tactic := fun stx =>
stx[0].getSepArgs.forM evalTactic
@[builtinTactic paren] def evalParen : Tactic := fun stx =>
evalTactic stx[1]
@[builtinTactic tacticSeq1Indented] def evalTacticSeq1Indented : Tactic := fun stx =>
stx[0].forArgsM fun seqElem => evalTactic seqElem[0]
@[builtinTactic tacticSeqBracketed] def evalTacticSeqBracketed : Tactic := fun stx =>
withRef stx[2] $ focusAndDone $ stx[1].forArgsM fun seqElem => evalTactic seqElem[0]
@[builtinTactic Parser.Tactic.focus] def evalFocus : Tactic := fun stx =>
focus $ evalTactic stx[1]
@[builtinTactic Parser.Tactic.allGoals] def evalAllGoals : Tactic := fun stx => do
let gs ← getUnsolvedGoals
let mut gsNew := []
for g in gs do
setGoals [g]
evalTactic stx[1]
gsNew := gsNew ++ (← getUnsolvedGoals)
setGoals gsNew
@[builtinTactic tacticSeq] def evalTacticSeq : Tactic := fun stx =>
evalTactic stx[0]
partial def evalChoiceAux (tactics : Array Syntax) (i : Nat) : TacticM Unit :=
if h : i < tactics.size then
let tactic := tactics.get ⟨i, h⟩
catchInternalId unsupportedSyntaxExceptionId
(evalTactic tactic)
(fun _ => evalChoiceAux tactics (i+1))
else
throwUnsupportedSyntax
@[builtinTactic choice] def evalChoice : Tactic := fun stx =>
evalChoiceAux stx.getArgs 0
@[builtinTactic skip] def evalSkip : Tactic := fun stx => pure ()
@[builtinTactic failIfSuccess] def evalFailIfSuccess : Tactic := fun stx => do
let tactic := stx[1]
if (← try evalTactic tactic; pure true catch _ => pure false) then
throwError "tactic succeeded"
@[builtinTactic traceState] def evalTraceState : Tactic := fun stx => do
let gs ← getUnsolvedGoals
logInfo (goalsToMessageData gs)
@[builtinTactic Lean.Parser.Tactic.assumption] def evalAssumption : Tactic := fun stx =>
liftMetaTactic fun mvarId => do Meta.assumption mvarId; pure []
private def introStep (n : Name) : TacticM Unit :=
liftMetaTactic fun mvarId => do
let (_, mvarId) ← Meta.intro mvarId n
pure [mvarId]
@[builtinTactic Lean.Parser.Tactic.intro] def evalIntro : Tactic := fun stx =>
match stx with
| `(tactic| intro) => liftMetaTactic fun mvarId => do let (_, mvarId) ← Meta.intro1 mvarId; pure [mvarId]
| `(tactic| intro $h:ident) => introStep h.getId
| `(tactic| intro _) => introStep `_
| `(tactic| intro $pat:term) => do
let stxNew ← `(tactic| intro h; match h with | $pat:term => _; clear h)
withMacroExpansion stx stxNew $ evalTactic stxNew
| `(tactic| intro $hs:term*) => do
let h0 := hs.get! 0
let hs := hs.extract 1 hs.size
let stxNew ← `(tactic| intro $h0:term; intro $hs:term*)
withMacroExpansion stx stxNew $ evalTactic stxNew
| _ => throwUnsupportedSyntax
@[builtinTactic Lean.Parser.Tactic.introMatch] def evalIntroMatch : Tactic := fun stx => do
let matchAlts := stx[1]
let stxNew ← liftMacroM $ Term.expandMatchAltsIntoMatchTactic stx matchAlts
withMacroExpansion stx stxNew $ evalTactic stxNew
private def getIntrosSize : Expr → Nat
| Expr.forallE _ _ b _ => getIntrosSize b + 1
| Expr.letE _ _ _ b _ => getIntrosSize b + 1
| _ => 0
/- Recall that `ident' := ident <|> Term.hole` -/
def getNameOfIdent' (id : Syntax) : Name :=
if id.isIdent then id.getId else `_
@[builtinTactic «intros»] def evalIntros : Tactic := fun stx =>
match stx with
| `(tactic| intros) => liftMetaTactic fun mvarId => do
let type ← Meta.getMVarType mvarId
let type ← instantiateMVars type
let n := getIntrosSize type
let (_, mvarId) ← Meta.introN mvarId n
pure [mvarId]
| `(tactic| intros $ids*) => liftMetaTactic fun mvarId => do
let (_, mvarId) ← Meta.introN mvarId ids.size (ids.map getNameOfIdent').toList
pure [mvarId]
| _ => throwUnsupportedSyntax
def getFVarId (id : Syntax) : TacticM FVarId := withRef id do
let fvar? ← liftTermElabM $ Term.isLocalIdent? id;
match fvar? with
| some fvar => pure fvar.fvarId!
| none => throwError! "unknown variable '{id.getId}'"
def getFVarIds (ids : Array Syntax) : TacticM (Array FVarId) := do
withMainMVarContext $ ids.mapM getFVarId
@[builtinTactic Lean.Parser.Tactic.revert] def evalRevert : Tactic := fun stx =>
match stx with
| `(tactic| revert $hs*) => do
let (g, gs) ← getMainGoal
let fvarIds ← getFVarIds hs
let (_, g) ← Meta.revert g fvarIds
setGoals (g :: gs)
| _ => throwUnsupportedSyntax
/- Sort free variables using an order `x < y` iff `x` was defined after `y` -/
private def sortFVarIds (fvarIds : Array FVarId) : TacticM (Array FVarId) :=
withMainMVarContext do
let lctx ← getLCtx
pure $ fvarIds.qsort fun fvarId₁ fvarId₂ =>
match lctx.find? fvarId₁, lctx.find? fvarId₂ with
| some d₁, some d₂ => d₁.index > d₂.index
| some _, none => false
| none, some _ => true
| none, none => Name.quickLt fvarId₁ fvarId₂
@[builtinTactic Lean.Parser.Tactic.clear] def evalClear : Tactic := fun stx =>
match stx with
| `(tactic| clear $hs*) => do
let fvarIds ← getFVarIds hs
let fvarIds ← sortFVarIds fvarIds
for fvarId in fvarIds do
let (g, gs) ← getMainGoal
withMVarContext g do
let g ← clear g fvarId
setGoals (g :: gs)
| _ => throwUnsupportedSyntax
def forEachVar (hs : Array Syntax) (tac : MVarId → FVarId → MetaM MVarId) : TacticM Unit := do
for h in hs do
let (g, gs) ← getMainGoal;
withMVarContext g do
let fvarId ← getFVarId h
let g ← tac g fvarId
setGoals (g :: gs)
@[builtinTactic Lean.Parser.Tactic.subst] def evalSubst : Tactic := fun stx =>
match stx with
| `(tactic| subst $hs*) => forEachVar hs Meta.subst
| _ => throwUnsupportedSyntax
/--
First method searches for a metavariable `g` s.t. `tag` is a suffix of its name.
If none is found, then it searches for a metavariable `g` s.t. `tag` is a prefix of its name. -/
private def findTag? (gs : List MVarId) (tag : Name) : TacticM (Option MVarId) := do
let g? ← gs.findM? (fun g => do pure $ tag.isSuffixOf (← getMVarDecl g).userName);
match g? with
| some g => pure g
| none => gs.findM? (fun g => do pure $ tag.isPrefixOf (← getMVarDecl g).userName)
@[builtinTactic «case»] def evalCase : Tactic := fun stx =>
match stx with
| `(tactic| case $tag => $tac:tacticSeq) => do
let tag := tag.getId
let gs ← getUnsolvedGoals
let some g ← findTag? gs tag | throwError "tag not found"
let gs := gs.erase g
setGoals [g]
let savedTag ← liftM $ getMVarTag g
liftM $ setMVarTag g Name.anonymous
try
closeUsingOrAdmit tac
finally
liftM $ setMVarTag g savedTag
done
setGoals gs
| _ => throwUnsupportedSyntax
@[builtinTactic «first»] partial def evalFirst : Tactic := fun stx => do
let tacs := stx[2].getSepArgs
if tacs.isEmpty then throwUnsupportedSyntax
loop tacs 0
where
loop (tacs : Array Syntax) (i : Nat) :=
if i == tacs.size - 1 then
evalTactic tacs[i]
else
evalTactic tacs[i] <|> loop tacs (i+1)
builtin_initialize registerTraceClass `Elab.tactic
@[inline] def TacticM.run {α} (x : TacticM α) (ctx : Context) (s : State) : TermElabM (α × State) :=
x ctx |>.run s
@[inline] def TacticM.run' {α} (x : TacticM α) (ctx : Context) (s : State) : TermElabM α :=
Prod.fst <$> x.run ctx s
end Lean.Elab.Tactic
|
34e6d904e2fe9c5985b20504444f963984317223 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/set_theory/cardinal/ordinal.lean | 655c3a267b92c2b59a6694c64a5a93894943b8ac | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 49,719 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import data.finsupp.multiset
import order.bounded
import set_theory.ordinal.principal
import tactic.linarith
/-!
# Cardinals and ordinals
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
Relationships between cardinals and ordinals, properties of cardinals that are proved
using ordinals.
## Main definitions
* The function `cardinal.aleph'` gives the cardinals listed by their ordinal
index, and is the inverse of `cardinal.aleph_idx`.
`aleph' n = n`, `aleph' ω = ℵ₀`, `aleph' (ω + 1) = succ ℵ₀`, etc.
It is an order isomorphism between ordinals and cardinals.
* The function `cardinal.aleph` gives the infinite cardinals listed by their
ordinal index. `aleph 0 = ℵ₀`, `aleph 1 = succ ℵ₀` is the first
uncountable cardinal, and so on.
* The function `cardinal.beth` enumerates the Beth cardinals. `beth 0 = ℵ₀`,
`beth (succ o) = 2 ^ beth o`, and for a limit ordinal `o`, `beth o` is the supremum of `beth a`
for `a < o`.
## Main Statements
* `cardinal.mul_eq_max` and `cardinal.add_eq_max` state that the product (resp. sum) of two infinite
cardinals is just their maximum. Several variations around this fact are also given.
* `cardinal.mk_list_eq_mk` : when `α` is infinite, `α` and `list α` have the same cardinality.
* simp lemmas for inequalities between `bit0 a` and `bit1 b` are registered, making `simp`
able to prove inequalities about numeral cardinals.
## Tags
cardinal arithmetic (for infinite cardinals)
-/
noncomputable theory
open function cardinal set equiv order
open_locale classical cardinal ordinal
universes u v w
namespace cardinal
section using_ordinals
open ordinal
theorem ord_is_limit {c} (co : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : (ord c).is_limit :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, aleph_0_ne_zero _, λ a, lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (λ h, _)⟩,
{ rw [←ordinal.le_zero, ord_le] at h,
simpa only [card_zero, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] using co.trans h },
{ rw ord_le at h ⊢,
rwa [←@add_one_of_aleph_0_le (card a), ←card_succ],
rw [←ord_le, ←le_succ_of_is_limit, ord_le],
{ exact co.trans h },
{ rw ord_aleph_0, exact omega_is_limit } }
end
/-! ### Aleph cardinals -/
/-- The `aleph'` index function, which gives the ordinal index of a cardinal.
(The `aleph'` part is because unlike `aleph` this counts also the
finite stages. So `aleph_idx n = n`, `aleph_idx ω = ω`,
`aleph_idx ℵ₁ = ω + 1` and so on.)
In this definition, we register additionally that this function is an initial segment,
i.e., it is order preserving and its range is an initial segment of the ordinals.
For the basic function version, see `aleph_idx`.
For an upgraded version stating that the range is everything, see `aleph_idx.rel_iso`. -/
def aleph_idx.initial_seg : @initial_seg cardinal ordinal (<) (<) :=
@rel_embedding.collapse cardinal ordinal (<) (<) _ cardinal.ord.order_embedding.lt_embedding
/-- The `aleph'` index function, which gives the ordinal index of a cardinal.
(The `aleph'` part is because unlike `aleph` this counts also the
finite stages. So `aleph_idx n = n`, `aleph_idx ω = ω`,
`aleph_idx ℵ₁ = ω + 1` and so on.)
For an upgraded version stating that the range is everything, see `aleph_idx.rel_iso`. -/
def aleph_idx : cardinal → ordinal := aleph_idx.initial_seg
@[simp] theorem aleph_idx.initial_seg_coe :
(aleph_idx.initial_seg : cardinal → ordinal) = aleph_idx := rfl
@[simp] theorem aleph_idx_lt {a b} : aleph_idx a < aleph_idx b ↔ a < b :=
aleph_idx.initial_seg.to_rel_embedding.map_rel_iff
@[simp] theorem aleph_idx_le {a b} : aleph_idx a ≤ aleph_idx b ↔ a ≤ b :=
by rw [← not_lt, ← not_lt, aleph_idx_lt]
theorem aleph_idx.init {a b} : b < aleph_idx a → ∃ c, aleph_idx c = b :=
aleph_idx.initial_seg.init
/-- The `aleph'` index function, which gives the ordinal index of a cardinal.
(The `aleph'` part is because unlike `aleph` this counts also the
finite stages. So `aleph_idx n = n`, `aleph_idx ℵ₀ = ω`,
`aleph_idx ℵ₁ = ω + 1` and so on.)
In this version, we register additionally that this function is an order isomorphism
between cardinals and ordinals.
For the basic function version, see `aleph_idx`. -/
def aleph_idx.rel_iso : @rel_iso cardinal.{u} ordinal.{u} (<) (<) :=
@rel_iso.of_surjective cardinal.{u} ordinal.{u} (<) (<) aleph_idx.initial_seg.{u} $
(initial_seg.eq_or_principal aleph_idx.initial_seg.{u}).resolve_right $
λ ⟨o, e⟩, begin
have : ∀ c, aleph_idx c < o := λ c, (e _).2 ⟨_, rfl⟩,
refine ordinal.induction_on o _ this, introsI α r _ h,
let s := ⨆ a, inv_fun aleph_idx (ordinal.typein r a),
apply (lt_succ s).not_le,
have I : injective aleph_idx := aleph_idx.initial_seg.to_embedding.injective,
simpa only [typein_enum, left_inverse_inv_fun I (succ s)] using le_csupr
(cardinal.bdd_above_range.{u u} (λ a : α, inv_fun aleph_idx (ordinal.typein r a)))
(ordinal.enum r _ (h (succ s)))
end
@[simp] theorem aleph_idx.rel_iso_coe :
(aleph_idx.rel_iso : cardinal → ordinal) = aleph_idx := rfl
@[simp] theorem type_cardinal : @type cardinal (<) _ = ordinal.univ.{u (u+1)} :=
by rw ordinal.univ_id; exact quotient.sound ⟨aleph_idx.rel_iso⟩
@[simp] theorem mk_cardinal : #cardinal = univ.{u (u+1)} :=
by simpa only [card_type, card_univ] using congr_arg card type_cardinal
/-- The `aleph'` function gives the cardinals listed by their ordinal
index, and is the inverse of `aleph_idx`.
`aleph' n = n`, `aleph' ω = ω`, `aleph' (ω + 1) = succ ℵ₀`, etc.
In this version, we register additionally that this function is an order isomorphism
between ordinals and cardinals.
For the basic function version, see `aleph'`. -/
def aleph'.rel_iso := cardinal.aleph_idx.rel_iso.symm
/-- The `aleph'` function gives the cardinals listed by their ordinal
index, and is the inverse of `aleph_idx`.
`aleph' n = n`, `aleph' ω = ω`, `aleph' (ω + 1) = succ ℵ₀`, etc. -/
def aleph' : ordinal → cardinal := aleph'.rel_iso
@[simp] theorem aleph'.rel_iso_coe :
(aleph'.rel_iso : ordinal → cardinal) = aleph' := rfl
@[simp] theorem aleph'_lt {o₁ o₂ : ordinal} : aleph' o₁ < aleph' o₂ ↔ o₁ < o₂ :=
aleph'.rel_iso.map_rel_iff
@[simp] theorem aleph'_le {o₁ o₂ : ordinal} : aleph' o₁ ≤ aleph' o₂ ↔ o₁ ≤ o₂ :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 aleph'_lt
@[simp] theorem aleph'_aleph_idx (c : cardinal) : aleph' c.aleph_idx = c :=
cardinal.aleph_idx.rel_iso.to_equiv.symm_apply_apply c
@[simp] theorem aleph_idx_aleph' (o : ordinal) : (aleph' o).aleph_idx = o :=
cardinal.aleph_idx.rel_iso.to_equiv.apply_symm_apply o
@[simp] theorem aleph'_zero : aleph' 0 = 0 :=
by { rw [← nonpos_iff_eq_zero, ← aleph'_aleph_idx 0, aleph'_le], apply ordinal.zero_le }
@[simp] theorem aleph'_succ {o : ordinal} : aleph' (succ o) = succ (aleph' o) :=
begin
apply (succ_le_of_lt $ aleph'_lt.2 $ lt_succ o).antisymm' (cardinal.aleph_idx_le.1 $ _),
rw [aleph_idx_aleph', succ_le_iff, ← aleph'_lt, aleph'_aleph_idx],
apply lt_succ
end
@[simp] theorem aleph'_nat : ∀ n : ℕ, aleph' n = n
| 0 := aleph'_zero
| (n+1) := show aleph' (succ n) = n.succ,
by rw [aleph'_succ, aleph'_nat, nat_succ]
theorem aleph'_le_of_limit {o : ordinal} (l : o.is_limit) {c} :
aleph' o ≤ c ↔ ∀ o' < o, aleph' o' ≤ c :=
⟨λ h o' h', (aleph'_le.2 $ h'.le).trans h,
λ h, begin
rw [←aleph'_aleph_idx c, aleph'_le, limit_le l],
intros x h',
rw [←aleph'_le, aleph'_aleph_idx],
exact h _ h'
end⟩
theorem aleph'_limit {o : ordinal} (ho : o.is_limit) : aleph' o = ⨆ a : Iio o, aleph' a :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ (csupr_le' (λ i, aleph'_le.2 (le_of_lt i.2))),
rw aleph'_le_of_limit ho,
exact λ a ha, le_csupr (bdd_above_of_small _) (⟨a, ha⟩ : Iio o)
end
@[simp] theorem aleph'_omega : aleph' ω = ℵ₀ :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ c, begin
simp only [aleph'_le_of_limit omega_is_limit, lt_omega, exists_imp_distrib, aleph_0_le],
exact forall_swap.trans (forall_congr $ λ n, by simp only [forall_eq, aleph'_nat]),
end
/-- `aleph'` and `aleph_idx` form an equivalence between `ordinal` and `cardinal` -/
@[simp] def aleph'_equiv : ordinal ≃ cardinal :=
⟨aleph', aleph_idx, aleph_idx_aleph', aleph'_aleph_idx⟩
/-- The `aleph` function gives the infinite cardinals listed by their
ordinal index. `aleph 0 = ℵ₀`, `aleph 1 = succ ℵ₀` is the first
uncountable cardinal, and so on. -/
def aleph (o : ordinal) : cardinal := aleph' (ω + o)
@[simp] theorem aleph_lt {o₁ o₂ : ordinal} : aleph o₁ < aleph o₂ ↔ o₁ < o₂ :=
aleph'_lt.trans (add_lt_add_iff_left _)
@[simp] theorem aleph_le {o₁ o₂ : ordinal} : aleph o₁ ≤ aleph o₂ ↔ o₁ ≤ o₂ :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 aleph_lt
@[simp] theorem max_aleph_eq (o₁ o₂ : ordinal) : max (aleph o₁) (aleph o₂) = aleph (max o₁ o₂) :=
begin
cases le_total (aleph o₁) (aleph o₂) with h h,
{ rw [max_eq_right h, max_eq_right (aleph_le.1 h)] },
{ rw [max_eq_left h, max_eq_left (aleph_le.1 h)] }
end
@[simp] theorem aleph_succ {o : ordinal} : aleph (succ o) = succ (aleph o) :=
by rw [aleph, add_succ, aleph'_succ, aleph]
@[simp] theorem aleph_zero : aleph 0 = ℵ₀ :=
by rw [aleph, add_zero, aleph'_omega]
theorem aleph_limit {o : ordinal} (ho : o.is_limit) : aleph o = ⨆ a : Iio o, aleph a :=
begin
apply le_antisymm _ (csupr_le' _),
{ rw [aleph, aleph'_limit (ho.add _)],
refine csupr_mono' (bdd_above_of_small _) _,
rintro ⟨i, hi⟩,
cases lt_or_le i ω,
{ rcases lt_omega.1 h with ⟨n, rfl⟩,
use ⟨0, ho.pos⟩,
simpa using (nat_lt_aleph_0 n).le },
{ exact ⟨⟨_, (sub_lt_of_le h).2 hi⟩, aleph'_le.2 (le_add_sub _ _)⟩ } },
{ exact λ i, aleph_le.2 (le_of_lt i.2) }
end
theorem aleph_0_le_aleph' {o : ordinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ aleph' o ↔ ω ≤ o :=
by rw [← aleph'_omega, aleph'_le]
theorem aleph_0_le_aleph (o : ordinal) : ℵ₀ ≤ aleph o :=
by { rw [aleph, aleph_0_le_aleph'], apply ordinal.le_add_right }
theorem aleph'_pos {o : ordinal} (ho : 0 < o) : 0 < aleph' o :=
by rwa [←aleph'_zero, aleph'_lt]
theorem aleph_pos (o : ordinal) : 0 < aleph o :=
aleph_0_pos.trans_le (aleph_0_le_aleph o)
@[simp] theorem aleph_to_nat (o : ordinal) : (aleph o).to_nat = 0 :=
to_nat_apply_of_aleph_0_le $ aleph_0_le_aleph o
@[simp] theorem aleph_to_part_enat (o : ordinal) : (aleph o).to_part_enat = ⊤ :=
to_part_enat_apply_of_aleph_0_le $ aleph_0_le_aleph o
instance nonempty_out_aleph (o : ordinal) : nonempty (aleph o).ord.out.α :=
begin
rw [out_nonempty_iff_ne_zero, ←ord_zero],
exact λ h, (ord_injective h).not_gt (aleph_pos o)
end
theorem ord_aleph_is_limit (o : ordinal) : (aleph o).ord.is_limit :=
ord_is_limit $ aleph_0_le_aleph _
instance (o : ordinal) : no_max_order (aleph o).ord.out.α :=
out_no_max_of_succ_lt (ord_aleph_is_limit o).2
theorem exists_aleph {c : cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ c ↔ ∃ o, c = aleph o :=
⟨λ h, ⟨aleph_idx c - ω,
by { rw [aleph, ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le, aleph'_aleph_idx],
rwa [← aleph_0_le_aleph', aleph'_aleph_idx] }⟩,
λ ⟨o, e⟩, e.symm ▸ aleph_0_le_aleph _⟩
theorem aleph'_is_normal : is_normal (ord ∘ aleph') :=
⟨λ o, ord_lt_ord.2 $ aleph'_lt.2 $ lt_succ o,
λ o l a, by simp only [ord_le, aleph'_le_of_limit l]⟩
theorem aleph_is_normal : is_normal (ord ∘ aleph) :=
aleph'_is_normal.trans $ add_is_normal ω
theorem succ_aleph_0 : succ ℵ₀ = aleph 1 :=
by rw [←aleph_zero, ←aleph_succ, ordinal.succ_zero]
lemma aleph_0_lt_aleph_one : ℵ₀ < aleph 1 :=
by { rw ←succ_aleph_0, apply lt_succ }
lemma countable_iff_lt_aleph_one {α : Type*} (s : set α) : s.countable ↔ #s < aleph 1 :=
by rw [←succ_aleph_0, lt_succ_iff, le_aleph_0_iff_set_countable]
/-- Ordinals that are cardinals are unbounded. -/
theorem ord_card_unbounded : unbounded (<) {b : ordinal | b.card.ord = b} :=
unbounded_lt_iff.2 $ λ a, ⟨_, ⟨(by { dsimp, rw card_ord }), (lt_ord_succ_card a).le⟩⟩
theorem eq_aleph'_of_eq_card_ord {o : ordinal} (ho : o.card.ord = o) : ∃ a, (aleph' a).ord = o :=
⟨cardinal.aleph_idx.rel_iso o.card, by simpa using ho⟩
/-- `ord ∘ aleph'` enumerates the ordinals that are cardinals. -/
theorem ord_aleph'_eq_enum_card : ord ∘ aleph' = enum_ord {b : ordinal | b.card.ord = b} :=
begin
rw [←eq_enum_ord _ ord_card_unbounded, range_eq_iff],
exact ⟨aleph'_is_normal.strict_mono, ⟨(λ a, (by { dsimp, rw card_ord })),
λ b hb, eq_aleph'_of_eq_card_ord hb⟩⟩
end
/-- Infinite ordinals that are cardinals are unbounded. -/
theorem ord_card_unbounded' : unbounded (<) {b : ordinal | b.card.ord = b ∧ ω ≤ b} :=
(unbounded_lt_inter_le ω).2 ord_card_unbounded
theorem eq_aleph_of_eq_card_ord {o : ordinal} (ho : o.card.ord = o) (ho' : ω ≤ o) :
∃ a, (aleph a).ord = o :=
begin
cases eq_aleph'_of_eq_card_ord ho with a ha,
use a - ω,
unfold aleph,
rwa ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le,
rwa [←aleph_0_le_aleph', ←ord_le_ord, ha, ord_aleph_0]
end
/-- `ord ∘ aleph` enumerates the infinite ordinals that are cardinals. -/
theorem ord_aleph_eq_enum_card :
ord ∘ aleph = enum_ord {b : ordinal | b.card.ord = b ∧ ω ≤ b} :=
begin
rw ←eq_enum_ord _ ord_card_unbounded',
use aleph_is_normal.strict_mono,
rw range_eq_iff,
refine ⟨(λ a, ⟨_, _⟩), λ b hb, eq_aleph_of_eq_card_ord hb.1 hb.2⟩,
{ rw card_ord },
{ rw [←ord_aleph_0, ord_le_ord],
exact aleph_0_le_aleph _ }
end
/-! ### Beth cardinals -/
/-- Beth numbers are defined so that `beth 0 = ℵ₀`, `beth (succ o) = 2 ^ (beth o)`, and when `o` is
a limit ordinal, `beth o` is the supremum of `beth o'` for `o' < o`.
Assuming the generalized continuum hypothesis, which is undecidable in ZFC, `beth o = aleph o` for
every `o`. -/
def beth (o : ordinal.{u}) : cardinal.{u} :=
limit_rec_on o aleph_0 (λ _ x, 2 ^ x) (λ a ha IH, ⨆ b : Iio a, IH b.1 b.2)
@[simp] theorem beth_zero : beth 0 = aleph_0 :=
limit_rec_on_zero _ _ _
@[simp] theorem beth_succ (o : ordinal) : beth (succ o) = 2 ^ beth o :=
limit_rec_on_succ _ _ _ _
theorem beth_limit {o : ordinal} : o.is_limit → beth o = ⨆ a : Iio o, beth a :=
limit_rec_on_limit _ _ _ _
theorem beth_strict_mono : strict_mono beth :=
begin
intros a b,
induction b using ordinal.induction with b IH generalizing a,
intro h,
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with rfl | ⟨c, rfl⟩ | hb,
{ exact (ordinal.not_lt_zero a h).elim },
{ rw lt_succ_iff at h,
rw beth_succ,
apply lt_of_le_of_lt _ (cantor _),
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h with rfl | h, { refl },
exact (IH c (lt_succ c) h).le },
{ apply (cantor _).trans_le,
rw [beth_limit hb, ←beth_succ],
exact le_csupr (bdd_above_of_small _) (⟨_, hb.succ_lt h⟩ : Iio b) }
end
lemma beth_mono : monotone beth := beth_strict_mono.monotone
@[simp] theorem beth_lt {o₁ o₂ : ordinal} : beth o₁ < beth o₂ ↔ o₁ < o₂ :=
beth_strict_mono.lt_iff_lt
@[simp] theorem beth_le {o₁ o₂ : ordinal} : beth o₁ ≤ beth o₂ ↔ o₁ ≤ o₂ :=
beth_strict_mono.le_iff_le
theorem aleph_le_beth (o : ordinal) : aleph o ≤ beth o :=
begin
apply limit_rec_on o,
{ simp },
{ intros o h,
rw [aleph_succ, beth_succ, succ_le_iff],
exact (cantor _).trans_le (power_le_power_left two_ne_zero h) },
{ intros o ho IH,
rw [aleph_limit ho, beth_limit ho],
exact csupr_mono (bdd_above_of_small _) (λ x, IH x.1 x.2) }
end
theorem aleph_0_le_beth (o : ordinal) : ℵ₀ ≤ beth o :=
(aleph_0_le_aleph o).trans $ aleph_le_beth o
theorem beth_pos (o : ordinal) : 0 < beth o :=
aleph_0_pos.trans_le $ aleph_0_le_beth o
theorem beth_ne_zero (o : ordinal) : beth o ≠ 0 :=
(beth_pos o).ne'
lemma beth_normal : is_normal.{u} (λ o, (beth o).ord) :=
(is_normal_iff_strict_mono_limit _).2 ⟨ord_strict_mono.comp beth_strict_mono, λ o ho a ha,
by { rw [beth_limit ho, ord_le], exact csupr_le' (λ b, ord_le.1 (ha _ b.2)) }⟩
/-! ### Properties of `mul` -/
/-- If `α` is an infinite type, then `α × α` and `α` have the same cardinality. -/
theorem mul_eq_self {c : cardinal} (h : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : c * c = c :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _
(by simpa only [mul_one] using
mul_le_mul_left' (one_le_aleph_0.trans h) c),
-- the only nontrivial part is `c * c ≤ c`. We prove it inductively.
refine acc.rec_on (cardinal.lt_wf.apply c) (λ c _,
quotient.induction_on c $ λ α IH ol, _) h,
-- consider the minimal well-order `r` on `α` (a type with cardinality `c`).
rcases ord_eq α with ⟨r, wo, e⟩, resetI,
letI := linear_order_of_STO r,
haveI : is_well_order α (<) := wo,
-- Define an order `s` on `α × α` by writing `(a, b) < (c, d)` if `max a b < max c d`, or
-- the max are equal and `a < c`, or the max are equal and `a = c` and `b < d`.
let g : α × α → α := λ p, max p.1 p.2,
let f : α × α ↪ ordinal × (α × α) :=
⟨λ p:α×α, (typein (<) (g p), p), λ p q, congr_arg prod.snd⟩,
let s := f ⁻¹'o (prod.lex (<) (prod.lex (<) (<))),
-- this is a well order on `α × α`.
haveI : is_well_order _ s := (rel_embedding.preimage _ _).is_well_order,
/- it suffices to show that this well order is smaller than `r`
if it were larger, then `r` would be a strict prefix of `s`. It would be contained in
`β × β` for some `β` of cardinality `< c`. By the inductive assumption, this set has the
same cardinality as `β` (or it is finite if `β` is finite), so it is `< c`, which is a
contradiction. -/
suffices : type s ≤ type r, {exact card_le_card this},
refine le_of_forall_lt (λ o h, _),
rcases typein_surj s h with ⟨p, rfl⟩,
rw [← e, lt_ord],
refine lt_of_le_of_lt
(_ : _ ≤ card (succ (typein (<) (g p))) * card (succ (typein (<) (g p)))) _,
{ have : {q | s q p} ⊆ insert (g p) {x | x < g p} ×ˢ insert (g p) {x | x < g p},
{ intros q h,
simp only [s, embedding.coe_fn_mk, order.preimage, typein_lt_typein, prod.lex_def, typein_inj]
at h,
exact max_le_iff.1 (le_iff_lt_or_eq.2 $ h.imp_right and.left) },
suffices H : (insert (g p) {x | r x (g p)} : set α) ≃ ({x | r x (g p)} ⊕ punit),
{ exact ⟨(set.embedding_of_subset _ _ this).trans
((equiv.set.prod _ _).trans (H.prod_congr H)).to_embedding⟩ },
refine (equiv.set.insert _).trans
((equiv.refl _).sum_congr punit_equiv_punit),
apply @irrefl _ r },
cases lt_or_le (card (succ (typein (<) (g p)))) ℵ₀ with qo qo,
{ exact (mul_lt_aleph_0 qo qo).trans_le ol },
{ suffices, {exact (IH _ this qo).trans_lt this},
rw ← lt_ord, apply (ord_is_limit ol).2,
rw [mk_def, e], apply typein_lt_type }
end
end using_ordinals
/-- If `α` and `β` are infinite types, then the cardinality of `α × β` is the maximum
of the cardinalities of `α` and `β`. -/
theorem mul_eq_max {a b : cardinal} (ha : ℵ₀ ≤ a) (hb : ℵ₀ ≤ b) : a * b = max a b :=
le_antisymm
(mul_eq_self (ha.trans (le_max_left a b)) ▸
mul_le_mul' (le_max_left _ _) (le_max_right _ _)) $
max_le
(by simpa only [mul_one] using
mul_le_mul_left' (one_le_aleph_0.trans hb) a)
(by simpa only [one_mul] using
mul_le_mul_right' (one_le_aleph_0.trans ha) b)
@[simp] theorem mul_mk_eq_max {α β : Type*} [infinite α] [infinite β] : #α * #β = max (#α) (#β) :=
mul_eq_max (aleph_0_le_mk α) (aleph_0_le_mk β)
@[simp] theorem aleph_mul_aleph (o₁ o₂ : ordinal) : aleph o₁ * aleph o₂ = aleph (max o₁ o₂) :=
by rw [cardinal.mul_eq_max (aleph_0_le_aleph o₁) (aleph_0_le_aleph o₂), max_aleph_eq]
@[simp] theorem aleph_0_mul_eq {a : cardinal} (ha : ℵ₀ ≤ a) : ℵ₀ * a = a :=
(mul_eq_max le_rfl ha).trans (max_eq_right ha)
@[simp] theorem mul_aleph_0_eq {a : cardinal} (ha : ℵ₀ ≤ a) : a * ℵ₀ = a :=
(mul_eq_max ha le_rfl).trans (max_eq_left ha)
@[simp] theorem aleph_0_mul_mk_eq {α : Type*} [infinite α] : ℵ₀ * #α = #α :=
aleph_0_mul_eq (aleph_0_le_mk α)
@[simp] theorem mk_mul_aleph_0_eq {α : Type*} [infinite α] : #α * ℵ₀ = #α :=
mul_aleph_0_eq (aleph_0_le_mk α)
@[simp] theorem aleph_0_mul_aleph (o : ordinal) : ℵ₀ * aleph o = aleph o :=
aleph_0_mul_eq (aleph_0_le_aleph o)
@[simp] theorem aleph_mul_aleph_0 (o : ordinal) : aleph o * ℵ₀ = aleph o :=
mul_aleph_0_eq (aleph_0_le_aleph o)
theorem mul_lt_of_lt {a b c : cardinal} (hc : ℵ₀ ≤ c) (h1 : a < c) (h2 : b < c) : a * b < c :=
(mul_le_mul' (le_max_left a b) (le_max_right a b)).trans_lt $
(lt_or_le (max a b) ℵ₀).elim
(λ h, (mul_lt_aleph_0 h h).trans_le hc)
(λ h, by { rw mul_eq_self h, exact max_lt h1 h2 })
lemma mul_le_max_of_aleph_0_le_left {a b : cardinal} (h : ℵ₀ ≤ a) : a * b ≤ max a b :=
begin
convert mul_le_mul' (le_max_left a b) (le_max_right a b),
rw mul_eq_self,
refine h.trans (le_max_left a b)
end
lemma mul_eq_max_of_aleph_0_le_left {a b : cardinal} (h : ℵ₀ ≤ a) (h' : b ≠ 0) : a * b = max a b :=
begin
cases le_or_lt ℵ₀ b with hb hb, { exact mul_eq_max h hb },
refine (mul_le_max_of_aleph_0_le_left h).antisymm _,
have : b ≤ a, from hb.le.trans h,
rw [max_eq_left this],
convert mul_le_mul_left' (one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr h') _, rw [mul_one],
end
lemma mul_le_max_of_aleph_0_le_right {a b : cardinal} (h : ℵ₀ ≤ b) : a * b ≤ max a b :=
by simpa only [mul_comm, max_comm] using mul_le_max_of_aleph_0_le_left h
lemma mul_eq_max_of_aleph_0_le_right {a b : cardinal} (h' : a ≠ 0) (h : ℵ₀ ≤ b) : a * b = max a b :=
begin
rw [mul_comm, max_comm],
exact mul_eq_max_of_aleph_0_le_left h h'
end
lemma mul_eq_max' {a b : cardinal} (h : ℵ₀ ≤ a * b) : a * b = max a b :=
begin
rcases aleph_0_le_mul_iff.mp h with ⟨ha, hb, ha' | hb'⟩,
{ exact mul_eq_max_of_aleph_0_le_left ha' hb },
{ exact mul_eq_max_of_aleph_0_le_right ha hb' }
end
theorem mul_le_max (a b : cardinal) : a * b ≤ max (max a b) ℵ₀ :=
begin
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with rfl | ha0, { simp },
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with rfl | hb0, { simp },
cases le_or_lt ℵ₀ a with ha ha,
{ rw [mul_eq_max_of_aleph_0_le_left ha hb0],
exact le_max_left _ _ },
{ cases le_or_lt ℵ₀ b with hb hb,
{ rw [mul_comm, mul_eq_max_of_aleph_0_le_left hb ha0, max_comm],
exact le_max_left _ _ },
{ exact le_max_of_le_right (mul_lt_aleph_0 ha hb).le } }
end
lemma mul_eq_left {a b : cardinal} (ha : ℵ₀ ≤ a) (hb : b ≤ a) (hb' : b ≠ 0) : a * b = a :=
by { rw [mul_eq_max_of_aleph_0_le_left ha hb', max_eq_left hb] }
lemma mul_eq_right {a b : cardinal} (hb : ℵ₀ ≤ b) (ha : a ≤ b) (ha' : a ≠ 0) : a * b = b :=
by { rw [mul_comm, mul_eq_left hb ha ha'] }
lemma le_mul_left {a b : cardinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a ≤ b * a :=
by { convert mul_le_mul_right' (one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr h) _,
rw [one_mul] }
lemma le_mul_right {a b : cardinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a ≤ a * b :=
by { rw [mul_comm], exact le_mul_left h }
lemma mul_eq_left_iff {a b : cardinal} : a * b = a ↔ ((max ℵ₀ b ≤ a ∧ b ≠ 0) ∨ b = 1 ∨ a = 0) :=
begin
rw max_le_iff,
refine ⟨λ h, _, _⟩,
{ cases le_or_lt ℵ₀ a with ha ha,
{ have : a ≠ 0, { rintro rfl, exact ha.not_lt aleph_0_pos },
left, use ha,
{ rw ←not_lt, exact λ hb, ne_of_gt (hb.trans_le (le_mul_left this)) h },
{ rintro rfl, apply this, rw mul_zero at h, exact h.symm }},
right, by_cases h2a : a = 0, { exact or.inr h2a },
have hb : b ≠ 0, { rintro rfl, apply h2a, rw mul_zero at h, exact h.symm },
left, rw [←h, mul_lt_aleph_0_iff, lt_aleph_0, lt_aleph_0] at ha,
rcases ha with rfl|rfl|⟨⟨n, rfl⟩, ⟨m, rfl⟩⟩, contradiction, contradiction,
rw ←ne at h2a, rw ←one_le_iff_ne_zero at h2a hb, norm_cast at h2a hb h ⊢,
apply le_antisymm _ hb, rw ←not_lt,
apply λ h2b, ne_of_gt _ h, conv_lhs { rw ←mul_one n },
rwa mul_lt_mul_left, apply nat.lt_of_succ_le h2a },
{ rintro (⟨⟨ha, hab⟩, hb⟩|rfl|rfl),
{ rw [mul_eq_max_of_aleph_0_le_left ha hb, max_eq_left hab] },
all_goals { simp }}
end
/-! ### Properties of `add` -/
/-- If `α` is an infinite type, then `α ⊕ α` and `α` have the same cardinality. -/
theorem add_eq_self {c : cardinal} (h : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : c + c = c :=
le_antisymm
(by simpa only [nat.cast_bit0, nat.cast_one, mul_eq_self h, two_mul] using
mul_le_mul_right' ((nat_lt_aleph_0 2).le.trans h) c)
(self_le_add_left c c)
/-- If `α` is an infinite type, then the cardinality of `α ⊕ β` is the maximum
of the cardinalities of `α` and `β`. -/
theorem add_eq_max {a b : cardinal} (ha : ℵ₀ ≤ a) : a + b = max a b :=
le_antisymm
(add_eq_self (ha.trans (le_max_left a b)) ▸
add_le_add (le_max_left _ _) (le_max_right _ _)) $
max_le (self_le_add_right _ _) (self_le_add_left _ _)
theorem add_eq_max' {a b : cardinal} (ha : ℵ₀ ≤ b) : a + b = max a b :=
by rw [add_comm, max_comm, add_eq_max ha]
@[simp] theorem add_mk_eq_max {α β : Type*} [infinite α] : #α + #β = max (#α) (#β) :=
add_eq_max (aleph_0_le_mk α)
@[simp] theorem add_mk_eq_max' {α β : Type*} [infinite β] : #α + #β = max (#α) (#β) :=
add_eq_max' (aleph_0_le_mk β)
theorem add_le_max (a b : cardinal) : a + b ≤ max (max a b) ℵ₀ :=
begin
cases le_or_lt ℵ₀ a with ha ha,
{ rw [add_eq_max ha],
exact le_max_left _ _ },
{ cases le_or_lt ℵ₀ b with hb hb,
{ rw [add_comm, add_eq_max hb, max_comm],
exact le_max_left _ _ },
{ exact le_max_of_le_right (add_lt_aleph_0 ha hb).le } }
end
theorem add_le_of_le {a b c : cardinal} (hc : ℵ₀ ≤ c) (h1 : a ≤ c) (h2 : b ≤ c) : a + b ≤ c :=
(add_le_add h1 h2).trans $ le_of_eq $ add_eq_self hc
theorem add_lt_of_lt {a b c : cardinal} (hc : ℵ₀ ≤ c) (h1 : a < c) (h2 : b < c) : a + b < c :=
(add_le_add (le_max_left a b) (le_max_right a b)).trans_lt $
(lt_or_le (max a b) ℵ₀).elim
(λ h, (add_lt_aleph_0 h h).trans_le hc)
(λ h, by rw add_eq_self h; exact max_lt h1 h2)
lemma eq_of_add_eq_of_aleph_0_le {a b c : cardinal} (h : a + b = c) (ha : a < c) (hc : ℵ₀ ≤ c) :
b = c :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ rw [← h], apply self_le_add_left },
rw[← not_lt], intro hb,
have : a + b < c := add_lt_of_lt hc ha hb,
simpa [h, lt_irrefl] using this
end
lemma add_eq_left {a b : cardinal} (ha : ℵ₀ ≤ a) (hb : b ≤ a) : a + b = a :=
by { rw [add_eq_max ha, max_eq_left hb] }
lemma add_eq_right {a b : cardinal} (hb : ℵ₀ ≤ b) (ha : a ≤ b) : a + b = b :=
by { rw [add_comm, add_eq_left hb ha] }
lemma add_eq_left_iff {a b : cardinal} : a + b = a ↔ (max ℵ₀ b ≤ a ∨ b = 0) :=
begin
rw max_le_iff,
refine ⟨λ h, _, _⟩,
{ cases (le_or_lt ℵ₀ a) with ha ha,
{ left, use ha, rw ←not_lt, apply λ hb, ne_of_gt _ h,
exact hb.trans_le (self_le_add_left b a) },
right, rw [←h, add_lt_aleph_0_iff, lt_aleph_0, lt_aleph_0] at ha,
rcases ha with ⟨⟨n, rfl⟩, ⟨m, rfl⟩⟩, norm_cast at h ⊢,
rw [←add_right_inj, h, add_zero] },
{ rintro (⟨h1, h2⟩|h3),
{ rw [add_eq_max h1, max_eq_left h2] },
{ rw [h3, add_zero] } }
end
lemma add_eq_right_iff {a b : cardinal} : a + b = b ↔ (max ℵ₀ a ≤ b ∨ a = 0) :=
by { rw [add_comm, add_eq_left_iff] }
lemma add_nat_eq {a : cardinal} (n : ℕ) (ha : ℵ₀ ≤ a) : a + n = a :=
add_eq_left ha ((nat_lt_aleph_0 _).le.trans ha)
lemma add_one_eq {a : cardinal} (ha : ℵ₀ ≤ a) : a + 1 = a :=
add_eq_left ha (one_le_aleph_0.trans ha)
@[simp] lemma mk_add_one_eq {α : Type*} [infinite α] : #α + 1 = #α :=
add_one_eq (aleph_0_le_mk α)
protected lemma eq_of_add_eq_add_left {a b c : cardinal} (h : a + b = a + c) (ha : a < ℵ₀) :
b = c :=
begin
cases le_or_lt ℵ₀ b with hb hb,
{ have : a < b := ha.trans_le hb,
rw [add_eq_right hb this.le, eq_comm] at h,
rw [eq_of_add_eq_of_aleph_0_le h this hb] },
{ have hc : c < ℵ₀,
{ rw ←not_le, intro hc,
apply lt_irrefl ℵ₀, apply (hc.trans (self_le_add_left _ a)).trans_lt,
rw ←h, apply add_lt_aleph_0 ha hb },
rw lt_aleph_0 at *,
rcases ha with ⟨n, rfl⟩, rcases hb with ⟨m, rfl⟩, rcases hc with ⟨k, rfl⟩,
norm_cast at h ⊢, apply add_left_cancel h }
end
protected lemma eq_of_add_eq_add_right {a b c : cardinal} (h : a + b = c + b) (hb : b < ℵ₀) :
a = c :=
by { rw [add_comm a b, add_comm c b] at h, exact cardinal.eq_of_add_eq_add_left h hb }
@[simp] theorem aleph_add_aleph (o₁ o₂ : ordinal) : aleph o₁ + aleph o₂ = aleph (max o₁ o₂) :=
by rw [cardinal.add_eq_max (aleph_0_le_aleph o₁), max_aleph_eq]
theorem principal_add_ord {c : cardinal} (hc : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : ordinal.principal (+) c.ord :=
λ a b ha hb, by { rw [lt_ord, ordinal.card_add] at *, exact add_lt_of_lt hc ha hb }
theorem principal_add_aleph (o : ordinal) : ordinal.principal (+) (aleph o).ord :=
principal_add_ord $ aleph_0_le_aleph o
lemma add_right_inj_of_lt_aleph_0 {α β γ : cardinal} (γ₀ : γ < aleph_0) :
α + γ = β + γ ↔ α = β :=
⟨λ h, cardinal.eq_of_add_eq_add_right h γ₀, λ h, congr_fun (congr_arg (+) h) γ⟩
@[simp] lemma add_nat_inj {α β : cardinal} (n : ℕ) :
α + n = β + n ↔ α = β :=
add_right_inj_of_lt_aleph_0 (nat_lt_aleph_0 _)
@[simp] lemma add_one_inj {α β : cardinal} :
α + 1 = β + 1 ↔ α = β :=
add_right_inj_of_lt_aleph_0 one_lt_aleph_0
lemma add_le_add_iff_of_lt_aleph_0 {α β γ : cardinal} (γ₀ : γ < cardinal.aleph_0) :
α + γ ≤ β + γ ↔ α ≤ β :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, λ h, add_le_add_right h γ⟩,
contrapose h,
rw [not_le, lt_iff_le_and_ne, ne] at h ⊢,
exact ⟨add_le_add_right h.1 γ, mt (add_right_inj_of_lt_aleph_0 γ₀).1 h.2⟩,
end
@[simp] lemma add_nat_le_add_nat_iff_of_lt_aleph_0 {α β : cardinal} (n : ℕ) :
α + n ≤ β + n ↔ α ≤ β :=
add_le_add_iff_of_lt_aleph_0 (nat_lt_aleph_0 n)
@[simp] lemma add_one_le_add_one_iff_of_lt_aleph_0 {α β : cardinal} :
α + 1 ≤ β + 1 ↔ α ≤ β :=
add_le_add_iff_of_lt_aleph_0 one_lt_aleph_0
/-! ### Properties about power -/
theorem pow_le {κ μ : cardinal.{u}} (H1 : ℵ₀ ≤ κ) (H2 : μ < ℵ₀) : κ ^ μ ≤ κ :=
let ⟨n, H3⟩ := lt_aleph_0.1 H2 in
H3.symm ▸ (quotient.induction_on κ (λ α H1, nat.rec_on n
(lt_of_lt_of_le (by { rw [nat.cast_zero, power_zero], exact one_lt_aleph_0 }) H1).le
(λ n ih, trans_rel_left _
(by { rw [nat.cast_succ, power_add, power_one], exact mul_le_mul_right' ih _ })
(mul_eq_self H1))) H1)
theorem pow_eq {κ μ : cardinal.{u}} (H1 : ℵ₀ ≤ κ) (H2 : 1 ≤ μ) (H3 : μ < ℵ₀) : κ ^ μ = κ :=
(pow_le H1 H3).antisymm $ self_le_power κ H2
lemma power_self_eq {c : cardinal} (h : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : c ^ c = 2 ^ c :=
begin
apply ((power_le_power_right $ (cantor c).le).trans _).antisymm,
{ convert power_le_power_right ((nat_lt_aleph_0 2).le.trans h), apply nat.cast_two.symm },
{ rw [←power_mul, mul_eq_self h] }
end
lemma prod_eq_two_power {ι : Type u} [infinite ι] {c : ι → cardinal.{v}} (h₁ : ∀ i, 2 ≤ c i)
(h₂ : ∀ i, lift.{u} (c i) ≤ lift.{v} (#ι)) :
prod c = 2 ^ lift.{v} (#ι) :=
begin
rw [← lift_id' (prod c), lift_prod, ← lift_two_power],
apply le_antisymm,
{ refine (prod_le_prod _ _ h₂).trans_eq _,
rw [prod_const, lift_lift, ← lift_power, power_self_eq (aleph_0_le_mk ι), lift_umax.{u v}] },
{ rw [← prod_const', lift_prod],
refine prod_le_prod _ _ (λ i, _),
rw [lift_two, ← lift_two.{u v}, lift_le],
exact h₁ i }
end
lemma power_eq_two_power {c₁ c₂ : cardinal} (h₁ : ℵ₀ ≤ c₁) (h₂ : 2 ≤ c₂) (h₂' : c₂ ≤ c₁) :
c₂ ^ c₁ = 2 ^ c₁ :=
le_antisymm (power_self_eq h₁ ▸ power_le_power_right h₂') (power_le_power_right h₂)
lemma nat_power_eq {c : cardinal.{u}} (h : ℵ₀ ≤ c) {n : ℕ} (hn : 2 ≤ n) :
(n : cardinal.{u}) ^ c = 2 ^ c :=
power_eq_two_power h (by assumption_mod_cast) ((nat_lt_aleph_0 n).le.trans h)
lemma power_nat_le {c : cardinal.{u}} {n : ℕ} (h : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : c ^ n ≤ c :=
pow_le h (nat_lt_aleph_0 n)
lemma power_nat_eq {c : cardinal.{u}} {n : ℕ} (h1 : ℵ₀ ≤ c) (h2 : 1 ≤ n) : c ^ n = c :=
pow_eq h1 (by exact_mod_cast h2) (nat_lt_aleph_0 n)
lemma power_nat_le_max {c : cardinal.{u}} {n : ℕ} : c ^ (n : cardinal.{u}) ≤ max c ℵ₀ :=
begin
cases le_or_lt ℵ₀ c with hc hc,
{ exact le_max_of_le_left (power_nat_le hc) },
{ exact le_max_of_le_right ((power_lt_aleph_0 hc (nat_lt_aleph_0 _)).le) }
end
lemma powerlt_aleph_0 {c : cardinal} (h : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : c ^< ℵ₀ = c :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ rw powerlt_le, intro c', rw lt_aleph_0, rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩, apply power_nat_le h },
convert le_powerlt c one_lt_aleph_0, rw power_one
end
lemma powerlt_aleph_0_le (c : cardinal) : c ^< ℵ₀ ≤ max c ℵ₀ :=
begin
cases le_or_lt ℵ₀ c,
{ rw powerlt_aleph_0 h, apply le_max_left },
rw powerlt_le,
exact λ c' hc', (power_lt_aleph_0 h hc').le.trans (le_max_right _ _)
end
/-! ### Computing cardinality of various types -/
@[simp] theorem mk_list_eq_mk (α : Type u) [infinite α] : #(list α) = #α :=
have H1 : ℵ₀ ≤ #α := aleph_0_le_mk α,
eq.symm $ le_antisymm ⟨⟨λ x, [x], λ x y H, (list.cons.inj H).1⟩⟩ $
calc #(list α)
= sum (λ n : ℕ, #α ^ (n : cardinal.{u})) : mk_list_eq_sum_pow α
... ≤ sum (λ n : ℕ, #α) : sum_le_sum _ _ $ λ n, pow_le H1 $ nat_lt_aleph_0 n
... = #α : by simp [H1]
theorem mk_list_eq_aleph_0 (α : Type u) [countable α] [nonempty α] : #(list α) = ℵ₀ :=
mk_le_aleph_0.antisymm (aleph_0_le_mk _)
theorem mk_list_eq_max_mk_aleph_0 (α : Type u) [nonempty α] : #(list α) = max (#α) ℵ₀ :=
begin
casesI finite_or_infinite α,
{ rw [mk_list_eq_aleph_0, eq_comm, max_eq_right],
exact mk_le_aleph_0 },
{ rw [mk_list_eq_mk, eq_comm, max_eq_left],
exact aleph_0_le_mk α }
end
theorem mk_list_le_max (α : Type u) : #(list α) ≤ max ℵ₀ (#α) :=
begin
casesI finite_or_infinite α,
{ exact mk_le_aleph_0.trans (le_max_left _ _) },
{ rw mk_list_eq_mk,
apply le_max_right }
end
@[simp] theorem mk_finset_of_infinite (α : Type u) [infinite α] : #(finset α) = #α :=
eq.symm $ le_antisymm (mk_le_of_injective (λ x y, finset.singleton_inj.1)) $
calc #(finset α) ≤ #(list α) : mk_le_of_surjective list.to_finset_surjective
... = #α : mk_list_eq_mk α
@[simp] lemma mk_finsupp_lift_of_infinite (α : Type u) (β : Type v) [infinite α] [has_zero β]
[nontrivial β] : #(α →₀ β) = max (lift.{v} (#α)) (lift.{u} (#β)) :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ calc #(α →₀ β) ≤ # (finset (α × β)) : mk_le_of_injective (finsupp.graph_injective α β)
... = #(α × β) : mk_finset_of_infinite _
... = max (lift.{v} (#α)) (lift.{u} (#β)) :
by rw [mk_prod, mul_eq_max_of_aleph_0_le_left]; simp },
{ apply max_le;
rw [←lift_id (# (α →₀ β)), ←lift_umax],
{ cases exists_ne (0 : β) with b hb,
exact lift_mk_le.{u (max u v) v}.2 ⟨⟨_, finsupp.single_left_injective hb⟩⟩ },
{ inhabit α,
exact lift_mk_le.{v (max u v) u}.2 ⟨⟨_, finsupp.single_injective default⟩⟩ } }
end
lemma mk_finsupp_of_infinite (α β : Type u) [infinite α] [has_zero β]
[nontrivial β] : #(α →₀ β) = max (#α) (#β) :=
by simp
@[simp] lemma mk_finsupp_lift_of_infinite' (α : Type u) (β : Type v) [nonempty α]
[has_zero β] [infinite β] : #(α →₀ β) = max (lift.{v} (#α)) (lift.{u} (#β)) :=
begin
casesI fintype_or_infinite α,
{ rw mk_finsupp_lift_of_fintype,
have : ℵ₀ ≤ (#β).lift := aleph_0_le_lift.2 (aleph_0_le_mk β),
rw [max_eq_right (le_trans _ this), power_nat_eq this],
exacts [fintype.card_pos, lift_le_aleph_0.2 (lt_aleph_0_of_finite _).le] },
{ apply mk_finsupp_lift_of_infinite },
end
lemma mk_finsupp_of_infinite' (α β : Type u) [nonempty α] [has_zero β] [infinite β] :
#(α →₀ β) = max (#α) (#β) := by simp
lemma mk_finsupp_nat (α : Type u) [nonempty α] : #(α →₀ ℕ) = max (#α) ℵ₀ := by simp
@[simp] lemma mk_multiset_of_nonempty (α : Type u) [nonempty α] : #(multiset α) = max (#α) ℵ₀ :=
multiset.to_finsupp.to_equiv.cardinal_eq.trans (mk_finsupp_nat α)
lemma mk_multiset_of_infinite (α : Type u) [infinite α] : #(multiset α) = #α := by simp
@[simp] lemma mk_multiset_of_is_empty (α : Type u) [is_empty α] : #(multiset α) = 1 :=
multiset.to_finsupp.to_equiv.cardinal_eq.trans (by simp)
lemma mk_multiset_of_countable (α : Type u) [countable α] [nonempty α] : #(multiset α) = ℵ₀ :=
multiset.to_finsupp.to_equiv.cardinal_eq.trans (by simp)
lemma mk_bounded_set_le_of_infinite (α : Type u) [infinite α] (c : cardinal) :
#{t : set α // #t ≤ c} ≤ #α ^ c :=
begin
refine le_trans _ (by rw [←add_one_eq (aleph_0_le_mk α)]),
induction c using cardinal.induction_on with β,
fapply mk_le_of_surjective,
{ intro f, use sum.inl ⁻¹' range f,
refine le_trans (mk_preimage_of_injective _ _ (λ x y, sum.inl.inj)) _,
apply mk_range_le },
rintro ⟨s, ⟨g⟩⟩,
use λ y, if h : ∃(x : s), g x = y then sum.inl (classical.some h).val else sum.inr ⟨⟩,
apply subtype.eq, ext,
split,
{ rintro ⟨y, h⟩, dsimp only at h, by_cases h' : ∃ (z : s), g z = y,
{ rw [dif_pos h'] at h, cases sum.inl.inj h, exact (classical.some h').2 },
{ rw [dif_neg h'] at h, cases h }},
{ intro h, have : ∃(z : s), g z = g ⟨x, h⟩, exact ⟨⟨x, h⟩, rfl⟩,
use g ⟨x, h⟩, dsimp only, rw [dif_pos this], congr',
suffices : classical.some this = ⟨x, h⟩, exact congr_arg subtype.val this,
apply g.2, exact classical.some_spec this }
end
lemma mk_bounded_set_le (α : Type u) (c : cardinal) :
#{t : set α // #t ≤ c} ≤ max (#α) ℵ₀ ^ c :=
begin
transitivity #{t : set (ulift.{u} ℕ ⊕ α) // #t ≤ c},
{ refine ⟨embedding.subtype_map _ _⟩, apply embedding.image,
use sum.inr, apply sum.inr.inj, intros s hs, exact mk_image_le.trans hs },
apply (mk_bounded_set_le_of_infinite (ulift.{u} ℕ ⊕ α) c).trans,
rw [max_comm, ←add_eq_max]; refl
end
lemma mk_bounded_subset_le {α : Type u} (s : set α) (c : cardinal.{u}) :
#{t : set α // t ⊆ s ∧ #t ≤ c} ≤ max (#s) ℵ₀ ^ c :=
begin
refine le_trans _ (mk_bounded_set_le s c),
refine ⟨embedding.cod_restrict _ _ _⟩,
use λ t, coe ⁻¹' t.1,
{ rintros ⟨t, ht1, ht2⟩ ⟨t', h1t', h2t'⟩ h, apply subtype.eq, dsimp only at h ⊢,
refine (preimage_eq_preimage' _ _).1 h; rw [subtype.range_coe]; assumption },
rintro ⟨t, h1t, h2t⟩, exact (mk_preimage_of_injective _ _ subtype.val_injective).trans h2t
end
/-! ### Properties of `compl` -/
lemma mk_compl_of_infinite {α : Type*} [infinite α] (s : set α) (h2 : #s < #α) :
#(sᶜ : set α) = #α :=
by { refine eq_of_add_eq_of_aleph_0_le _ h2 (aleph_0_le_mk α), exact mk_sum_compl s }
lemma mk_compl_finset_of_infinite {α : Type*} [infinite α] (s : finset α) :
#((↑s)ᶜ : set α) = #α :=
by { apply mk_compl_of_infinite, exact (finset_card_lt_aleph_0 s).trans_le (aleph_0_le_mk α) }
lemma mk_compl_eq_mk_compl_infinite {α : Type*} [infinite α] {s t : set α} (hs : #s < #α)
(ht : #t < #α) : #(sᶜ : set α) = #(tᶜ : set α) :=
by { rw [mk_compl_of_infinite s hs, mk_compl_of_infinite t ht] }
lemma mk_compl_eq_mk_compl_finite_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [finite α]
{s : set α} {t : set β} (h1 : lift.{max v w} (#α) = lift.{max u w} (#β))
(h2 : lift.{max v w} (#s) = lift.{max u w} (#t)) :
lift.{max v w} (#(sᶜ : set α)) = lift.{max u w} (#(tᶜ : set β)) :=
begin
casesI nonempty_fintype α,
rcases lift_mk_eq.1 h1 with ⟨e⟩, letI : fintype β := fintype.of_equiv α e,
replace h1 : fintype.card α = fintype.card β := (fintype.of_equiv_card _).symm,
classical,
lift s to finset α using s.to_finite,
lift t to finset β using t.to_finite,
simp only [finset.coe_sort_coe, mk_coe_finset, lift_nat_cast, nat.cast_inj] at h2,
simp only [← finset.coe_compl, finset.coe_sort_coe, mk_coe_finset, finset.card_compl,
lift_nat_cast, nat.cast_inj, h1, h2]
end
lemma mk_compl_eq_mk_compl_finite {α β : Type u} [finite α] {s : set α} {t : set β}
(h1 : #α = #β) (h : #s = #t) : #(sᶜ : set α) = #(tᶜ : set β) :=
by { rw ← lift_inj, apply mk_compl_eq_mk_compl_finite_lift; rwa [lift_inj] }
lemma mk_compl_eq_mk_compl_finite_same {α : Type*} [finite α] {s t : set α}
(h : #s = #t) : #(sᶜ : set α) = #(tᶜ : set α) :=
mk_compl_eq_mk_compl_finite rfl h
/-! ### Extending an injection to an equiv -/
theorem extend_function {α β : Type*} {s : set α} (f : s ↪ β)
(h : nonempty ((sᶜ : set α) ≃ ((range f)ᶜ : set β))) :
∃ (g : α ≃ β), ∀ x : s, g x = f x :=
begin
intros, have := h, cases this with g,
let h : α ≃ β := (set.sum_compl (s : set α)).symm.trans
((sum_congr (equiv.of_injective f f.2) g).trans
(set.sum_compl (range f))),
refine ⟨h, _⟩, rintro ⟨x, hx⟩, simp [set.sum_compl_symm_apply_of_mem, hx]
end
theorem extend_function_finite {α β : Type*} [finite α] {s : set α} (f : s ↪ β)
(h : nonempty (α ≃ β)) : ∃ (g : α ≃ β), ∀ x : s, g x = f x :=
begin
apply extend_function f,
cases id h with g,
rw [← lift_mk_eq] at h,
rw [←lift_mk_eq, mk_compl_eq_mk_compl_finite_lift h],
rw [mk_range_eq_lift], exact f.2
end
theorem extend_function_of_lt {α β : Type*} {s : set α} (f : s ↪ β) (hs : #s < #α)
(h : nonempty (α ≃ β)) : ∃ (g : α ≃ β), ∀ x : s, g x = f x :=
begin
casesI fintype_or_infinite α,
{ exact extend_function_finite f h },
{ apply extend_function f, cases id h with g, haveI := infinite.of_injective _ g.injective,
rw [← lift_mk_eq'] at h ⊢,
rwa [mk_compl_of_infinite s hs, mk_compl_of_infinite],
rwa [← lift_lt, mk_range_eq_of_injective f.injective, ← h, lift_lt] },
end
section bit
/-!
This section proves inequalities for `bit0` and `bit1`, enabling `simp` to solve inequalities
for numeral cardinals. The complexity of the resulting algorithm is not good, as in some cases
`simp` reduces an inequality to a disjunction of two situations, depending on whether a cardinal
is finite or infinite. Since the evaluation of the branches is not lazy, this is bad. It is good
enough for practical situations, though.
For specific numbers, these inequalities could also be deduced from the corresponding
inequalities of natural numbers using `norm_cast`:
```
example : (37 : cardinal) < 42 :=
by { norm_cast, norm_num }
```
-/
lemma bit0_ne_zero (a : cardinal) : ¬bit0 a = 0 ↔ ¬a = 0 :=
by simp [bit0]
@[simp] lemma bit1_ne_zero (a : cardinal) : ¬bit1 a = 0 :=
by simp [bit1]
@[simp] lemma zero_lt_bit0 (a : cardinal) : 0 < bit0 a ↔ 0 < a :=
by { rw ←not_iff_not, simp [bit0], }
@[simp] lemma zero_lt_bit1 (a : cardinal) : 0 < bit1 a :=
zero_lt_one.trans_le (self_le_add_left _ _)
@[simp] lemma one_le_bit0 (a : cardinal) : 1 ≤ bit0 a ↔ 0 < a :=
⟨λ h, (zero_lt_bit0 a).mp (zero_lt_one.trans_le h),
λ h, (one_le_iff_pos.mpr h).trans (self_le_add_left a a)⟩
@[simp] lemma one_le_bit1 (a : cardinal) : 1 ≤ bit1 a :=
self_le_add_left _ _
theorem bit0_eq_self {c : cardinal} (h : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : bit0 c = c :=
add_eq_self h
@[simp] theorem bit0_lt_aleph_0 {c : cardinal} : bit0 c < ℵ₀ ↔ c < ℵ₀ :=
by simp [bit0, add_lt_aleph_0_iff]
@[simp] theorem aleph_0_le_bit0 {c : cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ bit0 c ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ c :=
by { rw ←not_iff_not, simp }
@[simp] theorem bit1_eq_self_iff {c : cardinal} : bit1 c = c ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ c :=
begin
by_cases h : ℵ₀ ≤ c,
{ simp only [bit1, bit0_eq_self h, h, eq_self_iff_true, add_one_of_aleph_0_le] },
{ refine iff_of_false (ne_of_gt _) h,
rcases lt_aleph_0.1 (not_le.1 h) with ⟨n, rfl⟩,
norm_cast,
dsimp [bit1, bit0],
linarith }
end
@[simp] theorem bit1_lt_aleph_0 {c : cardinal} : bit1 c < ℵ₀ ↔ c < ℵ₀ :=
by simp [bit1, bit0, add_lt_aleph_0_iff, one_lt_aleph_0]
@[simp] theorem aleph_0_le_bit1 {c : cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ bit1 c ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ c :=
by { rw ←not_iff_not, simp }
@[simp] lemma bit0_le_bit0 {a b : cardinal} : bit0 a ≤ bit0 b ↔ a ≤ b :=
begin
cases le_or_lt ℵ₀ a with ha ha; cases le_or_lt ℵ₀ b with hb hb,
{ rw [bit0_eq_self ha, bit0_eq_self hb] },
{ rw bit0_eq_self ha,
refine iff_of_false (λ h, _) (hb.trans_le ha).not_le,
have A : bit0 b < ℵ₀, by simpa using hb,
exact lt_irrefl _ ((A.trans_le ha).trans_le h) },
{ rw bit0_eq_self hb,
exact iff_of_true ((bit0_lt_aleph_0.2 ha).le.trans hb) (ha.le.trans hb) },
{ rcases lt_aleph_0.1 ha with ⟨m, rfl⟩,
rcases lt_aleph_0.1 hb with ⟨n, rfl⟩,
norm_cast,
exact bit0_le_bit0 }
end
@[simp] lemma bit0_le_bit1 {a b : cardinal} : bit0 a ≤ bit1 b ↔ a ≤ b :=
begin
cases le_or_lt ℵ₀ a with ha ha; cases le_or_lt ℵ₀ b with hb hb,
{ rw [bit0_eq_self ha, bit1_eq_self_iff.2 hb] },
{ rw bit0_eq_self ha,
refine iff_of_false (λ h, _) (hb.trans_le ha).not_le,
have A : bit1 b < ℵ₀, by simpa using hb,
exact lt_irrefl _ ((A.trans_le ha).trans_le h) },
{ rw bit1_eq_self_iff.2 hb,
exact iff_of_true ((bit0_lt_aleph_0.2 ha).le.trans hb) (ha.le.trans hb) },
{ rcases lt_aleph_0.1 ha with ⟨m, rfl⟩,
rcases lt_aleph_0.1 hb with ⟨n, rfl⟩,
norm_cast,
exact nat.bit0_le_bit1_iff }
end
@[simp] lemma bit1_le_bit1 {a b : cardinal} : bit1 a ≤ bit1 b ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨λ h, bit0_le_bit1.1 ((self_le_add_right (bit0 a) 1).trans h), λ h,
(add_le_add_right (add_le_add_left h a) 1).trans (add_le_add_right (add_le_add_right h b) 1)⟩
@[simp] lemma bit1_le_bit0 {a b : cardinal} : bit1 a ≤ bit0 b ↔ (a < b ∨ (a ≤ b ∧ ℵ₀ ≤ a)) :=
begin
cases le_or_lt ℵ₀ a with ha ha; cases le_or_lt ℵ₀ b with hb hb,
{ simp only [bit1_eq_self_iff.mpr ha, bit0_eq_self hb, ha, and_true],
refine ⟨λ h, or.inr h, λ h, _⟩,
cases h,
{ exact le_of_lt h },
{ exact h } },
{ rw bit1_eq_self_iff.2 ha,
refine iff_of_false (λ h, _) (λ h, _),
{ have A : bit0 b < ℵ₀, by simpa using hb,
exact lt_irrefl _ ((A.trans_le ha).trans_le h) },
{ exact not_le_of_lt (hb.trans_le ha) (h.elim le_of_lt and.left) } },
{ rw bit0_eq_self hb,
exact iff_of_true ((bit1_lt_aleph_0.2 ha).le.trans hb) (or.inl $ ha.trans_le hb) },
{ rcases lt_aleph_0.1 ha with ⟨m, rfl⟩,
rcases lt_aleph_0.1 hb with ⟨n, rfl⟩,
norm_cast,
simp [not_le.mpr ha] }
end
@[simp] lemma bit0_lt_bit0 {a b : cardinal} : bit0 a < bit0 b ↔ a < b :=
begin
cases le_or_lt ℵ₀ a with ha ha; cases le_or_lt ℵ₀ b with hb hb,
{ rw [bit0_eq_self ha, bit0_eq_self hb] },
{ rw bit0_eq_self ha,
refine iff_of_false (λ h, _) (hb.le.trans ha).not_lt,
have A : bit0 b < ℵ₀, by simpa using hb,
exact lt_irrefl _ ((A.trans_le ha).trans h) },
{ rw bit0_eq_self hb,
exact iff_of_true ((bit0_lt_aleph_0.2 ha).trans_le hb) (ha.trans_le hb) },
{ rcases lt_aleph_0.1 ha with ⟨m, rfl⟩,
rcases lt_aleph_0.1 hb with ⟨n, rfl⟩,
norm_cast,
exact bit0_lt_bit0 }
end
@[simp] lemma bit1_lt_bit0 {a b : cardinal} : bit1 a < bit0 b ↔ a < b :=
begin
cases le_or_lt ℵ₀ a with ha ha; cases le_or_lt ℵ₀ b with hb hb,
{ rw [bit1_eq_self_iff.2 ha, bit0_eq_self hb] },
{ rw bit1_eq_self_iff.2 ha,
refine iff_of_false (λ h, _) (hb.le.trans ha).not_lt,
have A : bit0 b < ℵ₀, by simpa using hb,
exact lt_irrefl _ ((A.trans_le ha).trans h) },
{ rw bit0_eq_self hb,
exact iff_of_true ((bit1_lt_aleph_0.2 ha).trans_le hb) (ha.trans_le hb) },
{ rcases lt_aleph_0.1 ha with ⟨m, rfl⟩,
rcases lt_aleph_0.1 hb with ⟨n, rfl⟩,
norm_cast,
exact nat.bit1_lt_bit0_iff }
end
@[simp] lemma bit1_lt_bit1 {a b : cardinal} : bit1 a < bit1 b ↔ a < b :=
begin
cases le_or_lt ℵ₀ a with ha ha; cases le_or_lt ℵ₀ b with hb hb,
{ rw [bit1_eq_self_iff.2 ha, bit1_eq_self_iff.2 hb] },
{ rw bit1_eq_self_iff.2 ha,
refine iff_of_false (λ h, _) (hb.le.trans ha).not_lt,
have A : bit1 b < ℵ₀, by simpa using hb,
exact lt_irrefl _ ((A.trans_le ha).trans h) },
{ rw bit1_eq_self_iff.2 hb,
exact iff_of_true ((bit1_lt_aleph_0.2 ha).trans_le hb) (ha.trans_le hb) },
{ rcases lt_aleph_0.1 ha with ⟨m, rfl⟩,
rcases lt_aleph_0.1 hb with ⟨n, rfl⟩,
norm_cast,
exact bit1_lt_bit1 }
end
@[simp] lemma bit0_lt_bit1 {a b : cardinal} : bit0 a < bit1 b ↔ (a < b ∨ (a ≤ b ∧ a < ℵ₀)) :=
begin
cases le_or_lt ℵ₀ a with ha ha; cases le_or_lt ℵ₀ b with hb hb,
{ simp [bit0_eq_self ha, bit1_eq_self_iff.2 hb, not_lt.mpr ha] },
{ rw bit0_eq_self ha,
refine iff_of_false (λ h, _) (λ h, _),
{ have A : bit1 b < ℵ₀, by simpa using hb,
exact lt_irrefl _ ((A.trans_le ha).trans h) },
{ exact (hb.trans_le ha).not_le (h.elim le_of_lt and.left) } },
{ rw [bit1_eq_self_iff.2 hb],
exact iff_of_true ((bit0_lt_aleph_0.2 ha).trans_le hb) (or.inl $ ha.trans_le hb) },
{ rcases lt_aleph_0.1 ha with ⟨m, rfl⟩,
rcases lt_aleph_0.1 hb with ⟨n, rfl⟩,
norm_cast,
simp only [ha, and_true, nat.bit0_lt_bit1_iff, or_iff_right_of_imp le_of_lt] }
end
lemma one_lt_two : (1 : cardinal) < 2 :=
-- This strategy works generally to prove inequalities between numerals in `cardinality`.
by { norm_cast, norm_num }
@[simp] lemma one_lt_bit0 {a : cardinal} : 1 < bit0 a ↔ 0 < a :=
by simp [←bit1_zero]
@[simp] lemma one_lt_bit1 (a : cardinal) : 1 < bit1 a ↔ 0 < a :=
by simp [←bit1_zero]
end bit
end cardinal
|
6ee7ed10519a6bf02f5ddb8debcd869ad1dc772d | 624f6f2ae8b3b1adc5f8f67a365c51d5126be45a | /src/Init/Lean/Eval.lean | 508d9c52a645e5f17ea9a9632a075bf4c5745899 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | mhuisi/lean4 | 28d35a4febc2e251c7f05492e13f3b05d6f9b7af | dda44bc47f3e5d024508060dac2bcb59fd12e4c0 | refs/heads/master | 1,621,225,489,283 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 250,590,438 | 0 | 2 | Apache-2.0 | 1,602,443,220,000 | 1,585,327,814,000 | C | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,155 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Sebastian Ullrich
-/
prelude
import Init.Control.Reader
import Init.System.IO
import Init.Lean.Environment
namespace Lean
universe u
/-- `HasEval` extension that gives access to the current environment & options.
The basic `HasEval` class is in the prelude and should not depend on these
types. -/
class MetaHasEval (α : Type u) :=
(eval : Environment → Options → α → forall (hideUnit : optParam Bool true), IO Unit)
instance metaHasEvalOfHasEval {α : Type u} [HasEval α] : MetaHasEval α :=
⟨fun env opts a hideUnit => HasEval.eval a hideUnit⟩
abbrev MetaIO := ReaderT (Environment × Options) IO
def MetaIO.getEnv : MetaIO Environment := do
ctx ← read; pure ctx.1
def MetaIO.getOptions : MetaIO Options := do
ctx ← read; pure ctx.2
instance MetaIO.metaHasEval {α} [MetaHasEval α] : MetaHasEval (MetaIO α) :=
⟨fun env opts x _ => x (env, opts) >>= MetaHasEval.eval env opts⟩
instance MetaIO.monadIO : MonadIO MetaIO :=
⟨fun _ x _ => x⟩
end Lean
|
0ef8ea267b647c2aa806cfbf668fae828892b4dd | fddcf4b659baa121761c71be606b3f74b86fa695 | /Formalization/test_lean.lean | 65d35078bb870d1112dbaeb208f34702aaaf9e70 | [] | no_license | swarnpriya/Lean | 4218df9392f396cd7e5e745de35a917536ebd2bb | a0a9978fd058041eb1a09aec0e2dd7d19a7436a7 | refs/heads/master | 1,595,831,634,399 | 1,568,673,127,000 | 1,568,673,127,000 | 208,903,604 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 688 | lean |
universe u
constant α : Type u
#check α
def foo : (ℕ → ℕ) → ℕ := λ f, f 0
#check foo
#print foo
def double (x : ℕ) : ℕ := x + x
#print double
#check double 3
#reduce double 3
def square (x : ℕ) : ℕ := x * x
#check square
#reduce square 3
constants p q : Prop
theorem t1 : p → q → p := λ hp : p, λ hq : q, hp
#print t1
#check ¬p → p ↔ false
#reduce true ∧ false
theorem test (p q : Prop) (hp : p) (hq : q) : p ∧ q ∧ p :=
begin
apply and.intro,
exact hp,
apply and.intro,
exact hq,
exact hp
end
example : ∀ a b c : ℕ, a = b → a = c → c = b :=
begin
intros,
transitivity a,
symmetry,
assumption,
assumption
end
|
1b94526dd8e90d63fa648d427c00c9d63fb51e03 | e00ea76a720126cf9f6d732ad6216b5b824d20a7 | /src/data/set/intervals/basic.lean | 0b568e212fa5310a72417b943c64a7bdd920379d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | vaibhavkarve/mathlib | a574aaf68c0a431a47fa82ce0637f0f769826bfe | 17f8340912468f49bdc30acdb9a9fa02eeb0473a | refs/heads/master | 1,621,263,802,637 | 1,585,399,588,000 | 1,585,399,588,000 | 250,833,447 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,585,410,341,000 | 1,585,410,341,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 28,591 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import order.lattice algebra.order_functions algebra.ordered_field tactic.tauto
/-!
# Intervals
In any preorder `α`, we define intervals (which on each side can be either infinite, open, or
closed) using the following naming conventions:
- `i`: infinite
- `o`: open
- `c`: closed
Each interval has the name `I` + letter for left side + letter for right side. For instance,
`Ioc a b` denotes the inverval `(a, b]`.
This file contains these definitions, and basic facts on inclusion, intersection, difference of
intervals (where the precise statements may depend on the properties of the order, in particular
for some statements it should be `linear_order` or `densely_ordered`).
This file also contains statements on lower and upper bounds of intervals.
TODO: This is just the beginning; a lot of rules are missing
-/
universe u
namespace set
open set
section intervals
variables {α : Type u} [preorder α] {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ x : α}
/-- Left-open right-open interval -/
def Ioo (a b : α) := {x | a < x ∧ x < b}
/-- Left-closed right-open interval -/
def Ico (a b : α) := {x | a ≤ x ∧ x < b}
/-- Left-infinite right-open interval -/
def Iio (a : α) := {x | x < a}
/-- Left-closed right-closed interval -/
def Icc (a b : α) := {x | a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b}
/-- Left-infinite right-closed interval -/
def Iic (b : α) := {x | x ≤ b}
/-- Left-open right-closed interval -/
def Ioc (a b : α) := {x | a < x ∧ x ≤ b}
/-- Left-closed right-infinite interval -/
def Ici (a : α) := {x | a ≤ x}
/-- Left-open right-infinite interval -/
def Ioi (a : α) := {x | a < x}
@[simp] lemma mem_Ioo : x ∈ Ioo a b ↔ a < x ∧ x < b := iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_Ico : x ∈ Ico a b ↔ a ≤ x ∧ x < b := iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_Iio : x ∈ Iio b ↔ x < b := iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_Icc : x ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b := iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_Iic : x ∈ Iic b ↔ x ≤ b := iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_Ioc : x ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < x ∧ x ≤ b := iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_Ici : x ∈ Ici a ↔ a ≤ x := iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_Ioi : x ∈ Ioi a ↔ a < x := iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma left_mem_Ioo : a ∈ Ioo a b ↔ false := by simp [lt_irrefl]
@[simp] lemma left_mem_Ico : a ∈ Ico a b ↔ a < b := by simp [le_refl]
@[simp] lemma left_mem_Icc : a ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp [le_refl]
@[simp] lemma left_mem_Ioc : a ∈ Ioc a b ↔ false := by simp [lt_irrefl]
lemma left_mem_Ici : a ∈ Ici a := by simp
@[simp] lemma right_mem_Ioo : b ∈ Ioo a b ↔ false := by simp [lt_irrefl]
@[simp] lemma right_mem_Ico : b ∈ Ico a b ↔ false := by simp [lt_irrefl]
@[simp] lemma right_mem_Icc : b ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp [le_refl]
@[simp] lemma right_mem_Ioc : b ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < b := by simp [le_refl]
lemma right_mem_Iic : a ∈ Iic a := by simp
@[simp] lemma dual_Ici : @Ici (order_dual α) _ a = @Iic α _ a := rfl
@[simp] lemma dual_Iic : @Iic (order_dual α) _ a = @Ici α _ a := rfl
@[simp] lemma dual_Ioi : @Ioi (order_dual α) _ a = @Iio α _ a := rfl
@[simp] lemma dual_Iio : @Iio (order_dual α) _ a = @Ioi α _ a := rfl
@[simp] lemma dual_Icc : @Icc (order_dual α) _ a b = @Icc α _ b a :=
set.ext $ λ x, and_comm _ _
@[simp] lemma dual_Ioc : @Ioc (order_dual α) _ a b = @Ico α _ b a :=
set.ext $ λ x, and_comm _ _
@[simp] lemma dual_Ico : @Ico (order_dual α) _ a b = @Ioc α _ b a :=
set.ext $ λ x, and_comm _ _
@[simp] lemma dual_Ioo : @Ioo (order_dual α) _ a b = @Ioo α _ b a :=
set.ext $ λ x, and_comm _ _
@[simp] lemma nonempty_Icc : (Icc a b).nonempty ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨λ ⟨x, hx⟩, le_trans hx.1 hx.2, λ h, ⟨a, left_mem_Icc.2 h⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma nonempty_Ico : (Ico a b).nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨λ ⟨x, hx⟩, lt_of_le_of_lt hx.1 hx.2, λ h, ⟨a, left_mem_Ico.2 h⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma nonempty_Ioc : (Ioc a b).nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨λ ⟨x, hx⟩, lt_of_lt_of_le hx.1 hx.2, λ h, ⟨b, right_mem_Ioc.2 h⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma nonempty_Ici : (Ici a).nonempty := ⟨a, left_mem_Ici⟩
@[simp] lemma nonempty_Iic : (Iic a).nonempty := ⟨a, right_mem_Iic⟩
@[simp] lemma nonempty_Ioo [densely_ordered α] : (Ioo a b).nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨λ ⟨x, ha, hb⟩, lt_trans ha hb, dense⟩
@[simp] lemma nonempty_Ioi [no_top_order α] : (Ioi a).nonempty := no_top a
@[simp] lemma nonempty_Iio [no_bot_order α] : (Iio a).nonempty := no_bot a
@[simp] lemma Ioo_eq_empty (h : b ≤ a) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 $ λ x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, not_le_of_lt (lt_trans h₁ h₂) h
@[simp] lemma Ico_eq_empty (h : b ≤ a) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 $ λ x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, not_le_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt h₁ h₂) h
@[simp] lemma Icc_eq_empty (h : b < a) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 $ λ x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, not_lt_of_le (le_trans h₁ h₂) h
@[simp] lemma Ioc_eq_empty (h : b ≤ a) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 $ λ x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, not_lt_of_le (le_trans h₂ h) h₁
@[simp] lemma Ioo_self (a : α) : Ioo a a = ∅ := Ioo_eq_empty $ le_refl _
@[simp] lemma Ico_self (a : α) : Ico a a = ∅ := Ico_eq_empty $ le_refl _
@[simp] lemma Ioc_self (a : α) : Ioc a a = ∅ := Ioc_eq_empty $ le_refl _
lemma Ici_subset_Ici : Ici a ⊆ Ici b ↔ b ≤ a :=
⟨λ h, h $ left_mem_Ici, λ h x hx, le_trans h hx⟩
lemma Iic_subset_Iic : Iic a ⊆ Iic b ↔ a ≤ b :=
@Ici_subset_Ici (order_dual α) _ _ _
lemma Ici_subset_Ioi : Ici a ⊆ Ioi b ↔ b < a :=
⟨λ h, h left_mem_Ici, λ h x hx, lt_of_lt_of_le h hx⟩
lemma Iic_subset_Iio : Iic a ⊆ Iio b ↔ a < b :=
⟨λ h, h right_mem_Iic, λ h x hx, lt_of_le_of_lt hx h⟩
lemma Ioo_subset_Ioo (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) :
Ioo a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ :=
λ x ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩, ⟨lt_of_le_of_lt h₁ hx₁, lt_of_lt_of_le hx₂ h₂⟩
lemma Ioo_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioo a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo h (le_refl _)
lemma Ioo_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo (le_refl _) h
lemma Ico_subset_Ico (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) :
Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ :=
λ x ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩, ⟨le_trans h₁ hx₁, lt_of_lt_of_le hx₂ h₂⟩
lemma Ico_subset_Ico_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ico a₁ b :=
Ico_subset_Ico h (le_refl _)
lemma Ico_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ :=
Ico_subset_Ico (le_refl _) h
lemma Icc_subset_Icc (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ :=
λ x ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩, ⟨le_trans h₁ hx₁, le_trans hx₂ h₂⟩
lemma Icc_subset_Icc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Icc a₂ b ⊆ Icc a₁ b :=
Icc_subset_Icc h (le_refl _)
lemma Icc_subset_Icc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Icc a b₂ :=
Icc_subset_Icc (le_refl _) h
lemma Ioc_subset_Ioc (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) :
Ioc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ :=
λ x ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩, ⟨lt_of_le_of_lt h₁ hx₁, le_trans hx₂ h₂⟩
lemma Ioc_subset_Ioc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioc a₂ b ⊆ Ioc a₁ b :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc h (le_refl _)
lemma Ioc_subset_Ioc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioc a b₂ :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc (le_refl _) h
lemma Ico_subset_Ioo_left (h₁ : a₁ < a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b :=
λ x, and.imp_left $ lt_of_lt_of_le h₁
lemma Icc_subset_Ico_right (h₁ : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ :=
λ x, and.imp_right $ λ h₂, lt_of_le_of_lt h₂ h₁
lemma Ioo_subset_Ico_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ico a b := λ x, and.imp_left le_of_lt
lemma Ioo_subset_Ioc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioc a b := λ x, and.imp_right le_of_lt
lemma Ico_subset_Icc_self : Ico a b ⊆ Icc a b := λ x, and.imp_right le_of_lt
lemma Ioc_subset_Icc_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Icc a b := λ x, and.imp_left le_of_lt
lemma Ioo_subset_Icc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Icc a b :=
subset.trans Ioo_subset_Ico_self Ico_subset_Icc_self
lemma Ico_subset_Iio_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iio b := λ x, and.right
lemma Ioo_subset_Iio_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iio b := λ x, and.right
lemma Ioc_subset_Ioi_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioi a := λ x, and.left
lemma Ioo_subset_Ioi_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioi a := λ x, and.left
lemma Ioi_subset_Ici_self : Ioi a ⊆ Ici a := λx hx, le_of_lt hx
lemma Iio_subset_Iic_self : Iio a ⊆ Iic a := λx hx, le_of_lt hx
lemma Icc_subset_Icc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨λ h, ⟨(h ⟨le_refl _, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_refl _⟩).2⟩,
λ ⟨h, h'⟩ x ⟨hx, hx'⟩, ⟨le_trans h hx, le_trans hx' h'⟩⟩
lemma Icc_subset_Ioo_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨λ h, ⟨(h ⟨le_refl _, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_refl _⟩).2⟩,
λ ⟨h, h'⟩ x ⟨hx, hx'⟩, ⟨lt_of_lt_of_le h hx, lt_of_le_of_lt hx' h'⟩⟩
lemma Icc_subset_Ico_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨λ h, ⟨(h ⟨le_refl _, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_refl _⟩).2⟩,
λ ⟨h, h'⟩ x ⟨hx, hx'⟩, ⟨le_trans h hx, lt_of_le_of_lt hx' h'⟩⟩
lemma Icc_subset_Ioc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨λ h, ⟨(h ⟨le_refl _, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_refl _⟩).2⟩,
λ ⟨h, h'⟩ x ⟨hx, hx'⟩, ⟨lt_of_lt_of_le h hx, le_trans hx' h'⟩⟩
lemma Icc_subset_Iio_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Iio b₂ ↔ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨λ h, h ⟨h₁, le_refl _⟩, λ h x ⟨hx, hx'⟩, lt_of_le_of_lt hx' h⟩
lemma Icc_subset_Ioi_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioi a₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ :=
⟨λ h, h ⟨le_refl _, h₁⟩, λ h x ⟨hx, hx'⟩, lt_of_lt_of_le h hx⟩
lemma Icc_subset_Iic_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Iic b₂ ↔ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨λ h, h ⟨h₁, le_refl _⟩, λ h x ⟨hx, hx'⟩, le_trans hx' h⟩
lemma Icc_subset_Ici_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ici a₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ :=
⟨λ h, h ⟨le_refl _, h₁⟩, λ h x ⟨hx, hx'⟩, le_trans h hx⟩
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(b, +∞) ⊆ (a, +∞)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Ioi_subset_Ioi_iff`. -/
lemma Ioi_subset_Ioi (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ioi a :=
λx hx, lt_of_le_of_lt h hx
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(b, +∞) ⊆ [a, +∞)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in dense linear orders, use `Ioi_subset_Ici_iff`. -/
lemma Ioi_subset_Ici (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ici a :=
subset.trans (Ioi_subset_Ioi h) Ioi_subset_Ici_self
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(-∞, a) ⊆ (-∞, b)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Iio_subset_Iio_iff`. -/
lemma Iio_subset_Iio (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ⊆ Iio b :=
λx hx, lt_of_lt_of_le hx h
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(-∞, a) ⊆ (-∞, b]`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in dense linear orders, use `Iio_subset_Iic_iff`. -/
lemma Iio_subset_Iic (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ⊆ Iic b :=
subset.trans (Iio_subset_Iio h) Iio_subset_Iic_self
lemma Ici_inter_Iic : Ici a ∩ Iic b = Icc a b := rfl
lemma Ici_inter_Iio : Ici a ∩ Iio b = Ico a b := rfl
lemma Ioi_inter_Iic : Ioi a ∩ Iic b = Ioc a b := rfl
lemma Ioi_inter_Iio : Ioi a ∩ Iio b = Ioo a b := rfl
end intervals
section partial_order
variables {α : Type u} [partial_order α] {a b : α}
@[simp] lemma Icc_self (a : α) : Icc a a = {a} :=
set.ext $ by simp [Icc, le_antisymm_iff, and_comm]
lemma Ico_diff_Ioo_eq_singleton (h : a < b) : Ico a b \ Ioo a b = {a} :=
set.ext $ λ x, begin
simp [not_and'], split,
{ rintro ⟨⟨ax, xb⟩, hne⟩,
exact (eq_or_lt_of_le ax).elim eq.symm (λ h', absurd h' (hne xb)) },
{ rintro rfl, exact ⟨⟨le_refl _, h⟩, λ _, lt_irrefl x⟩ }
end
lemma Ioc_diff_Ioo_eq_singleton (h : a < b) : Ioc a b \ Ioo a b = {b} :=
set.ext $ λ x, begin
simp, split,
{ rintro ⟨⟨ax, xb⟩, hne⟩,
exact (eq_or_lt_of_le xb).elim id (λ h', absurd h' (hne ax)) },
{ rintro rfl, exact ⟨⟨h, le_refl _⟩, λ _, lt_irrefl x⟩ }
end
lemma Icc_diff_Ico_eq_singleton (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ico a b = {b} :=
set.ext $ λ x, begin
simp, split,
{ rintro ⟨⟨ax, xb⟩, h⟩,
exact classical.by_contradiction
(λ ne, h ax (lt_of_le_of_ne xb ne)) },
{ rintro rfl, exact ⟨⟨h, le_refl _⟩, λ _, lt_irrefl x⟩ }
end
lemma Icc_diff_Ioc_eq_singleton (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioc a b = {a} :=
set.ext $ λ x, begin
simp [not_and'], split,
{ rintro ⟨⟨ax, xb⟩, h⟩,
exact classical.by_contradiction
(λ hne, h xb (lt_of_le_of_ne ax (ne.symm hne))) },
{ rintro rfl, exact ⟨⟨le_refl _, h⟩, λ _, lt_irrefl x⟩ }
end
end partial_order
section linear_order
variables {α : Type u} [linear_order α] {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ : α}
lemma compl_Iic : -(Iic a) = Ioi a := ext $ λ _, not_le
lemma compl_Ici : -(Ici a) = Iio a := ext $ λ _, not_le
lemma compl_Iio : -(Iio a) = Ici a := ext $ λ _, not_lt
lemma compl_Ioi : -(Ioi a) = Iic a := ext $ λ _, not_lt
lemma Ioo_eq_empty_iff [densely_ordered α] : Ioo a b = ∅ ↔ b ≤ a :=
⟨λ eq, le_of_not_lt $ λ h,
let ⟨x, h₁, h₂⟩ := dense h in
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.1 eq x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
Ioo_eq_empty⟩
lemma Ico_eq_empty_iff : Ico a b = ∅ ↔ b ≤ a :=
⟨λ eq, le_of_not_lt $ λ h, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.1 eq a ⟨le_refl _, h⟩,
Ico_eq_empty⟩
lemma Icc_eq_empty_iff : Icc a b = ∅ ↔ b < a :=
⟨λ eq, lt_of_not_ge $ λ h, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.1 eq a ⟨le_refl _, h⟩,
Icc_eq_empty⟩
lemma Ico_subset_Ico_iff (h₁ : a₁ < b₁) :
Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨λ h, have a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ a₁ < b₂ := h ⟨le_refl _, h₁⟩,
⟨this.1, le_of_not_lt $ λ h', lt_irrefl b₂ (h ⟨le_of_lt this.2, h'⟩).2⟩,
λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, Ico_subset_Ico h₁ h₂⟩
lemma Ioo_subset_Ioo_iff [densely_ordered α] (h₁ : a₁ < b₁) :
Ioo a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨λ h, begin
rcases dense h₁ with ⟨x, xa, xb⟩,
split; refine le_of_not_lt (λ h', _),
{ have ab := lt_trans (h ⟨xa, xb⟩).1 xb,
exact lt_irrefl _ (h ⟨h', ab⟩).1 },
{ have ab := lt_trans xa (h ⟨xa, xb⟩).2,
exact lt_irrefl _ (h ⟨ab, h'⟩).2 }
end, λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, Ioo_subset_Ioo h₁ h₂⟩
lemma Ico_eq_Ico_iff (h : a₁ < b₁ ∨ a₂ < b₂) : Ico a₁ b₁ = Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₁ = a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ :=
⟨λ e, begin
simp [subset.antisymm_iff] at e, simp [le_antisymm_iff],
cases h; simp [Ico_subset_Ico_iff h] at e;
[ rcases e with ⟨⟨h₁, h₂⟩, e'⟩, rcases e with ⟨e', ⟨h₁, h₂⟩⟩ ];
have := (Ico_subset_Ico_iff (lt_of_le_of_lt h₁ $ lt_of_lt_of_le h h₂)).1 e';
tauto
end, λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, by rw [h₁, h₂]⟩
open_locale classical
@[simp] lemma Ioi_subset_Ioi_iff : Ioi b ⊆ Ioi a ↔ a ≤ b :=
begin
refine ⟨λh, _, λh, Ioi_subset_Ioi h⟩,
by_contradiction ba,
exact lt_irrefl _ (h (not_le.mp ba))
end
@[simp] lemma Ioi_subset_Ici_iff [densely_ordered α] : Ioi b ⊆ Ici a ↔ a ≤ b :=
begin
refine ⟨λh, _, λh, Ioi_subset_Ici h⟩,
by_contradiction ba,
obtain ⟨c, bc, ca⟩ : ∃c, b < c ∧ c < a := dense (not_le.mp ba),
exact lt_irrefl _ (lt_of_lt_of_le ca (h bc))
end
@[simp] lemma Iio_subset_Iio_iff : Iio a ⊆ Iio b ↔ a ≤ b :=
begin
refine ⟨λh, _, λh, Iio_subset_Iio h⟩,
by_contradiction ab,
exact lt_irrefl _ (h (not_le.mp ab))
end
@[simp] lemma Iio_subset_Iic_iff [densely_ordered α] : Iio a ⊆ Iic b ↔ a ≤ b :=
begin
refine ⟨λh, _, λh, Iio_subset_Iic h⟩,
by_contradiction ba,
obtain ⟨c, bc, ca⟩ : ∃c, b < c ∧ c < a := dense (not_le.mp ba),
exact lt_irrefl _ (lt_of_lt_of_le bc (h ca))
end
/-! ### Unions of adjacent intervals -/
/-! #### Two infinite intervals -/
@[simp] lemma Iic_union_Ici : Iic a ∪ Ici a = univ := eq_univ_of_forall (λ x, le_total x a)
@[simp] lemma Iio_union_Ici : Iio a ∪ Ici a = univ := eq_univ_of_forall (λ x, lt_or_le x a)
@[simp] lemma Iic_union_Ioi : Iic a ∪ Ioi a = univ := eq_univ_of_forall (λ x, le_or_lt x a)
/-! #### A finite and an infinite interval -/
@[simp] lemma Ioc_union_Ici_eq_Ioi (h : a < b) : Ioc a b ∪ Ici b = Ioi a :=
ext $ λ x, ⟨λ hx, hx.elim and.left (lt_of_lt_of_le h),
λ hx, (le_total x b).elim (λ hxb, or.inl ⟨hx, hxb⟩) (λ hxb, or.inr hxb)⟩
@[simp] lemma Icc_union_Ici_eq_Ioi (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b ∪ Ici b = Ici a :=
ext $ λ x, ⟨λ hx, hx.elim and.left (le_trans h),
λ hx, (le_total x b).elim (λ hxb, or.inl ⟨hx, hxb⟩) (λ hxb, or.inr hxb)⟩
@[simp] lemma Ioo_union_Ici_eq_Ioi (h : a < b) : Ioo a b ∪ Ici b = Ioi a :=
ext $ λ x, ⟨λ hx, hx.elim and.left (lt_of_lt_of_le h),
λ hx, (lt_or_le x b).elim (λ hxb, or.inl ⟨hx, hxb⟩) (λ hxb, or.inr hxb)⟩
@[simp] lemma Ico_union_Ici_eq_Ioi (h : a ≤ b) : Ico a b ∪ Ici b = Ici a :=
ext $ λ x, ⟨λ hx, hx.elim and.left (le_trans h),
λ hx, (lt_or_le x b).elim (λ hxb, or.inl ⟨hx, hxb⟩) (λ hxb, or.inr hxb)⟩
@[simp] lemma Ioc_union_Ioi_eq_Ioi (h : a ≤ b) : Ioc a b ∪ Ioi b = Ioi a :=
ext $ λ x, ⟨λ hx, hx.elim and.left (lt_of_le_of_lt h),
λ hx, (le_or_lt x b).elim (λ hxb, or.inl ⟨hx, hxb⟩) (λ hxb, or.inr hxb)⟩
@[simp] lemma Icc_union_Ioi_eq_Ioi (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b ∪ Ioi b = Ici a :=
ext $ λ x, ⟨λ hx, hx.elim and.left (λ hx, le_trans h (le_of_lt hx)),
λ hx, (le_or_lt x b).elim (λ hxb, or.inl ⟨hx, hxb⟩) (λ hxb, or.inr hxb)⟩
/-! #### An infinite and a finite interval -/
@[simp] lemma Iic_union_Icc_eq_Iic (h : a ≤ b) : Iic a ∪ Icc a b = Iic b :=
ext $ λ x, ⟨λ hx, hx.elim (λ hx, le_trans hx h) and.right,
λ hx, (le_total x a).elim (λ hxa, or.inl hxa) (λ hxa, or.inr ⟨hxa, hx⟩)⟩
@[simp] lemma Iic_union_Ico_eq_Iio (h : a < b) : Iic a ∪ Ico a b = Iio b :=
ext $ λ x, ⟨λ hx, hx.elim (λ hx, lt_of_le_of_lt hx h) and.right,
λ hx, (le_total x a).elim (λ hxa, or.inl hxa) (λ hxa, or.inr ⟨hxa, hx⟩)⟩
@[simp] lemma Iio_union_Icc_eq_Iic (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ∪ Icc a b = Iic b :=
ext $ λ x, ⟨λ hx, hx.elim (λ hx, le_trans (le_of_lt hx) h) and.right,
λ hx, (lt_or_le x a).elim (λ hxa, or.inl hxa) (λ hxa, or.inr ⟨hxa, hx⟩)⟩
@[simp] lemma Iio_union_Ico_eq_Iio (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ∪ Ico a b = Iio b :=
ext $ λ x, ⟨λ hx, hx.elim (λ hx, lt_of_lt_of_le hx h) and.right,
λ hx, (lt_or_le x a).elim (λ hxa, or.inl hxa) (λ hxa, or.inr ⟨hxa, hx⟩)⟩
@[simp] lemma Iic_union_Ioc_eq_Iic (h : a ≤ b) : Iic a ∪ Ioc a b = Iic b :=
ext $ λ x, ⟨λ hx, hx.elim (λ hx, le_trans hx h) and.right,
λ hx, (le_or_lt x a).elim (λ hxa, or.inl hxa) (λ hxa, or.inr ⟨hxa, hx⟩)⟩
@[simp] lemma Iic_union_Ioo_eq_Iio (h : a < b) : Iic a ∪ Ioo a b = Iio b :=
ext $ λ x, ⟨λ hx, hx.elim (λ hx, lt_of_le_of_lt hx h) and.right,
λ hx, (le_or_lt x a).elim (λ hxa, or.inl hxa) (λ hxa, or.inr ⟨hxa, hx⟩)⟩
/-! #### Two finite intervals with a common point -/
@[simp] lemma Ioc_union_Ico_eq_Ioo {c} (h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : b < c) : Ioc a b ∪ Ico b c = Ioo a c :=
ext $ λ x,
⟨λ hx, hx.elim (λ hx, ⟨hx.1, lt_of_le_of_lt hx.2 h₂⟩) (λ hx, ⟨lt_of_lt_of_le h₁ hx.1, hx.2⟩),
λ hx, (le_total x b).elim (λ hxb, or.inl ⟨hx.1, hxb⟩) (λ hxb, or.inr ⟨hxb, hx.2⟩)⟩
@[simp] lemma Icc_union_Ico_eq_Ico {c} (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : b < c) : Icc a b ∪ Ico b c = Ico a c :=
ext $ λ x,
⟨λ hx, hx.elim (λ hx, ⟨hx.1, lt_of_le_of_lt hx.2 h₂⟩) (λ hx, ⟨le_trans h₁ hx.1, hx.2⟩),
λ hx, (le_total x b).elim (λ hxb, or.inl ⟨hx.1, hxb⟩) (λ hxb, or.inr ⟨hxb, hx.2⟩)⟩
@[simp] lemma Icc_union_Icc_eq_Icc {c} (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : b ≤ c) : Icc a b ∪ Icc b c = Icc a c :=
ext $ λ x,
⟨λ hx, hx.elim (λ hx, ⟨hx.1, le_trans hx.2 h₂⟩) (λ hx, ⟨le_trans h₁ hx.1, hx.2⟩),
λ hx, (le_total x b).elim (λ hxb, or.inl ⟨hx.1, hxb⟩) (λ hxb, or.inr ⟨hxb, hx.2⟩)⟩
@[simp] lemma Ioc_union_Icc_eq_Ioc {c} (h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : b ≤ c) : Ioc a b ∪ Icc b c = Ioc a c :=
ext $ λ x,
⟨λ hx, hx.elim (λ hx, ⟨hx.1, le_trans hx.2 h₂⟩) (λ hx, ⟨lt_of_lt_of_le h₁ hx.1, hx.2⟩),
λ hx, (le_total x b).elim (λ hxb, or.inl ⟨hx.1, hxb⟩) (λ hxb, or.inr ⟨hxb, hx.2⟩)⟩
/-! #### Two finite intervals, `I?o` and `Ic?` -/
@[simp] lemma Ioo_union_Ico_eq_Ioo {c} (h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : b ≤ c) : Ioo a b ∪ Ico b c = Ioo a c :=
ext $ λ x,
⟨λ hx, hx.elim (λ hx, ⟨hx.1, lt_of_lt_of_le hx.2 h₂⟩) (λ hx, ⟨lt_of_lt_of_le h₁ hx.1, hx.2⟩),
λ hx, (lt_or_le x b).elim (λ hxb, or.inl ⟨hx.1, hxb⟩) (λ hxb, or.inr ⟨hxb, hx.2⟩)⟩
@[simp] lemma Ico_union_Ico_eq_Ico {c} (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : b ≤ c) : Ico a b ∪ Ico b c = Ico a c :=
ext $ λ x,
⟨λ hx, hx.elim (λ hx, ⟨hx.1, lt_of_lt_of_le hx.2 h₂⟩) (λ hx, ⟨le_trans h₁ hx.1, hx.2⟩),
λ hx, (lt_or_le x b).elim (λ hxb, or.inl ⟨hx.1, hxb⟩) (λ hxb, or.inr ⟨hxb, hx.2⟩)⟩
@[simp] lemma Ico_union_Icc_eq_Icc {c} (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : b ≤ c) : Ico a b ∪ Icc b c = Icc a c :=
ext $ λ x,
⟨λ hx, hx.elim (λ hx, ⟨hx.1, le_trans (le_of_lt hx.2) h₂⟩) (λ hx, ⟨le_trans h₁ hx.1, hx.2⟩),
λ hx, (lt_or_le x b).elim (λ hxb, or.inl ⟨hx.1, hxb⟩) (λ hxb, or.inr ⟨hxb, hx.2⟩)⟩
@[simp] lemma Ioo_union_Icc_eq_Ioc {c} (h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : b ≤ c) : Ioo a b ∪ Icc b c = Ioc a c :=
ext $ λ x,
⟨λ hx, hx.elim (λ hx, ⟨hx.1, le_trans (le_of_lt hx.2) h₂⟩) (λ hx, ⟨lt_of_lt_of_le h₁ hx.1, hx.2⟩),
λ hx, (lt_or_le x b).elim (λ hxb, or.inl ⟨hx.1, hxb⟩) (λ hxb, or.inr ⟨hxb, hx.2⟩)⟩
/-! #### Two finite intervals, `I?c` and `Io?` -/
@[simp] lemma Ioc_union_Ioo_eq_Ioo {c} (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : b < c) : Ioc a b ∪ Ioo b c = Ioo a c :=
ext $ λ x,
⟨λ hx, hx.elim (λ hx, ⟨hx.1, lt_of_le_of_lt hx.2 h₂⟩) (λ hx, ⟨lt_of_le_of_lt h₁ hx.1, hx.2⟩),
λ hx, (le_or_lt x b).elim (λ hxb, or.inl ⟨hx.1, hxb⟩) (λ hxb, or.inr ⟨hxb, hx.2⟩)⟩
@[simp] lemma Icc_union_Ioo_eq_Ico {c} (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : b < c) : Icc a b ∪ Ioo b c = Ico a c :=
ext $ λ x,
⟨λ hx, hx.elim (λ hx, ⟨hx.1, lt_of_le_of_lt hx.2 h₂⟩) (λ hx, ⟨le_trans h₁ (le_of_lt hx.1), hx.2⟩),
λ hx, (le_or_lt x b).elim (λ hxb, or.inl ⟨hx.1, hxb⟩) (λ hxb, or.inr ⟨hxb, hx.2⟩)⟩
@[simp] lemma Icc_union_Ioc_eq_Icc {c} (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : b ≤ c) : Icc a b ∪ Ioc b c = Icc a c :=
ext $ λ x,
⟨λ hx, hx.elim (λ hx, ⟨hx.1, le_trans hx.2 h₂⟩) (λ hx, ⟨le_trans h₁ (le_of_lt hx.1), hx.2⟩),
λ hx, (le_or_lt x b).elim (λ hxb, or.inl ⟨hx.1, hxb⟩) (λ hxb, or.inr ⟨hxb, hx.2⟩)⟩
@[simp] lemma Ioc_union_Ioc_eq_Ioc {c} (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : b ≤ c) : Ioc a b ∪ Ioc b c = Ioc a c :=
ext $ λ x,
⟨λ hx, hx.elim (λ hx, ⟨hx.1, le_trans hx.2 h₂⟩) (λ hx, ⟨lt_of_le_of_lt h₁ hx.1, hx.2⟩),
λ hx, (le_or_lt x b).elim (λ hxb, or.inl ⟨hx.1, hxb⟩) (λ hxb, or.inr ⟨hxb, hx.2⟩)⟩
end linear_order
section lattice
section inf
variables {α : Type u} [semilattice_inf α]
@[simp] lemma Iic_inter_Iic {a b : α} : Iic a ∩ Iic b = Iic (a ⊓ b) :=
by { ext x, simp [Iic] }
@[simp] lemma Iio_inter_Iio [is_total α (≤)] {a b : α} : Iio a ∩ Iio b = Iio (a ⊓ b) :=
by { ext x, simp [Iio] }
end inf
section sup
variables {α : Type u} [semilattice_sup α]
@[simp] lemma Ici_inter_Ici {a b : α} : Ici a ∩ Ici b = Ici (a ⊔ b) :=
by { ext x, simp [Ici] }
@[simp] lemma Ioi_inter_Ioi [is_total α (≤)] {a b : α} : Ioi a ∩ Ioi b = Ioi (a ⊔ b) :=
by { ext x, simp [Ioi] }
end sup
section both
variables {α : Type u} [lattice α] [ht : is_total α (≤)] {a b c a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : α}
lemma Icc_inter_Icc : Icc a₁ b₁ ∩ Icc a₂ b₂ = Icc (a₁ ⊔ a₂) (b₁ ⊓ b₂) :=
by simp only [Ici_inter_Iic.symm, Ici_inter_Ici.symm, Iic_inter_Iic.symm]; ac_refl
@[simp] lemma Icc_inter_Icc_eq_singleton (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) :
Icc a b ∩ Icc b c = {b} :=
begin
rw [Icc_inter_Icc],
convert Icc_self b,
exact sup_of_le_right hab,
exact inf_of_le_left hbc
end
include ht
lemma Ico_inter_Ico : Ico a₁ b₁ ∩ Ico a₂ b₂ = Ico (a₁ ⊔ a₂) (b₁ ⊓ b₂) :=
by simp only [Ici_inter_Iio.symm, Ici_inter_Ici.symm, Iio_inter_Iio.symm]; ac_refl
lemma Ioc_inter_Ioc : Ioc a₁ b₁ ∩ Ioc a₂ b₂ = Ioc (a₁ ⊔ a₂) (b₁ ⊓ b₂) :=
by simp only [Ioi_inter_Iic.symm, Ioi_inter_Ioi.symm, Iic_inter_Iic.symm]; ac_refl
lemma Ioo_inter_Ioo : Ioo a₁ b₁ ∩ Ioo a₂ b₂ = Ioo (a₁ ⊔ a₂) (b₁ ⊓ b₂) :=
by simp only [Ioi_inter_Iio.symm, Ioi_inter_Ioi.symm, Iio_inter_Iio.symm]; ac_refl
end both
end lattice
section decidable_linear_order
variables {α : Type u} [decidable_linear_order α] {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ : α}
@[simp] lemma Ico_diff_Iio {a b c : α} : Ico a b \ Iio c = Ico (max a c) b :=
set.ext $ by simp [Ico, Iio, iff_def, max_le_iff] {contextual:=tt}
@[simp] lemma Ico_inter_Iio {a b c : α} : Ico a b ∩ Iio c = Ico a (min b c) :=
set.ext $ by simp [Ico, Iio, iff_def, lt_min_iff] {contextual:=tt}
end decidable_linear_order
section ordered_comm_group
variables {α : Type u} [ordered_comm_group α]
lemma image_add_left_Icc (a b c : α) : ((+) a) '' Icc b c = Icc (a + b) (a + c) :=
begin
ext x,
split,
{ rintros ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨add_le_add_left hx.1 a, add_le_add_left hx.2 a⟩},
{ intro hx,
refine ⟨-a + x, _, add_neg_cancel_left _ _⟩,
exact ⟨le_neg_add_iff_add_le.2 hx.1, neg_add_le_iff_le_add.2 hx.2⟩ }
end
lemma image_add_right_Icc (a b c : α) : (λ x, x + c) '' Icc a b = Icc (a + c) (b + c) :=
by convert image_add_left_Icc c a b using 1; simp only [add_comm _ c]
lemma image_neg_Iio (r : α) : image (λz, -z) (Iio r) = Ioi (-r) :=
begin
ext z,
apply iff.intro,
{ intros hz,
apply exists.elim hz,
intros z' hz',
rw [←hz'.2],
simp only [mem_Ioi, neg_lt_neg_iff],
exact hz'.1 },
{ intros hz,
simp only [mem_image, mem_Iio],
use -z,
simp [hz],
exact neg_lt.1 hz }
end
lemma image_neg_Iic (r : α) : image (λz, -z) (Iic r) = Ici (-r) :=
begin
apply set.ext,
intros z,
apply iff.intro,
{ intros hz,
apply exists.elim hz,
intros z' hz',
rw [←hz'.2],
simp only [neg_le_neg_iff, mem_Ici],
exact hz'.1 },
{ intros hz,
simp only [mem_image, mem_Iic],
use -z,
simp [hz],
exact neg_le.1 hz }
end
end ordered_comm_group
section decidable_linear_ordered_comm_group
variables {α : Type u} [decidable_linear_ordered_comm_group α]
/-- If we remove a smaller interval from a larger, the result is nonempty -/
lemma nonempty_Ico_sdiff {x dx y dy : α} (h : dy < dx) (hx : 0 < dx) :
nonempty ↥(Ico x (x + dx) \ Ico y (y + dy)) :=
begin
cases lt_or_le x y with h' h',
{ use x, simp* },
{ use max x (x + dy), simp [*, le_refl] }
end
end decidable_linear_ordered_comm_group
section linear_ordered_field
variables {α : Type u} [linear_ordered_field α]
lemma image_mul_right_Icc' (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(λ x, x * c) '' Icc a b = Icc (a * c) (b * c) :=
begin
ext x,
split,
{ rintros ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hx.1 (le_of_lt h),
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hx.2 (le_of_lt h)⟩ },
{ intro hx,
refine ⟨x / c, _, div_mul_cancel x (ne_of_gt h)⟩,
exact ⟨le_div_of_mul_le h hx.1, div_le_of_le_mul h (mul_comm b c ▸ hx.2)⟩ }
end
lemma image_mul_right_Icc {a b c : α} (hab : a ≤ b) (hc : 0 ≤ c) :
(λ x, x * c) '' Icc a b = Icc (a * c) (b * c) :=
begin
cases eq_or_lt_of_le hc,
{ subst c,
simp [(nonempty_Icc.2 hab).image_const] },
exact image_mul_right_Icc' a b ‹0 < c›
end
lemma image_mul_left_Icc' {a : α} (h : 0 < a) (b c : α) :
((*) a) '' Icc b c = Icc (a * b) (a * c) :=
by { convert image_mul_right_Icc' b c h using 1; simp only [mul_comm _ a] }
lemma image_mul_left_Icc {a b c : α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hbc : b ≤ c) :
((*) a) '' Icc b c = Icc (a * b) (a * c) :=
by { convert image_mul_right_Icc hbc ha using 1; simp only [mul_comm _ a] }
end linear_ordered_field
end set
|
41826592a11c88c554a423e3ec5e86d8fb77660e | 35677d2df3f081738fa6b08138e03ee36bc33cad | /src/category/bifunctor.lean | 91e103616b982ef11dd7eb5f54fbd21d5028f9b8 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | gebner/mathlib | eab0150cc4f79ec45d2016a8c21750244a2e7ff0 | cc6a6edc397c55118df62831e23bfbd6e6c6b4ab | refs/heads/master | 1,625,574,853,976 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 99,101,412 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,586,716,389,000 | 1,501,667,958,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,354 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Simon Hudon
Functors with two arguments
-/
import logic.function data.sum
category.basic category.functor
tactic.basic
universes u₀ u₁ u₂ v₀ v₁ v₂
open function
class bifunctor (F : Type u₀ → Type u₁ → Type u₂) :=
(bimap : Π {α α' β β'}, (α → α') → (β → β') → F α β → F α' β')
export bifunctor ( bimap )
class is_lawful_bifunctor (F : Type u₀ → Type u₁ → Type u₂) [bifunctor F] :=
(id_bimap : Π {α β} (x : F α β), bimap id id x = x)
(bimap_bimap : Π {α₀ α₁ α₂ β₀ β₁ β₂} (f : α₀ → α₁) (f' : α₁ → α₂)
(g : β₀ → β₁) (g' : β₁ → β₂) (x : F α₀ β₀),
bimap f' g' (bimap f g x) = bimap (f' ∘ f) (g' ∘ g) x)
export is_lawful_bifunctor (id_bimap bimap_bimap)
attribute [higher_order bimap_id_id] id_bimap
attribute [higher_order bimap_comp_bimap] bimap_bimap
export is_lawful_bifunctor (bimap_id_id bimap_comp_bimap)
variables {F : Type u₀ → Type u₁ → Type u₂} [bifunctor F]
namespace bifunctor
@[reducible]
def fst {α α' β} (f : α → α') : F α β → F α' β :=
bimap f id
@[reducible]
def snd {α β β'} (f : β → β') : F α β → F α β' :=
bimap id f
variable [is_lawful_bifunctor F]
@[higher_order fst_id]
lemma id_fst : Π {α β} (x : F α β), fst id x = x :=
@id_bimap _ _ _
@[higher_order snd_id]
lemma id_snd : Π {α β} (x : F α β), snd id x = x :=
@id_bimap _ _ _
@[higher_order fst_comp_fst]
lemma comp_fst {α₀ α₁ α₂ β}
(f : α₀ → α₁) (f' : α₁ → α₂) (x : F α₀ β) :
fst f' (fst f x) = fst (f' ∘ f) x :=
by simp [fst,bimap_bimap]
@[higher_order fst_comp_snd]
lemma fst_snd {α₀ α₁ β₀ β₁}
(f : α₀ → α₁) (f' : β₀ → β₁) (x : F α₀ β₀) :
fst f (snd f' x) = bimap f f' x :=
by simp [fst,bimap_bimap]
@[higher_order snd_comp_fst]
lemma snd_fst {α₀ α₁ β₀ β₁}
(f : α₀ → α₁) (f' : β₀ → β₁) (x : F α₀ β₀) :
snd f' (fst f x) = bimap f f' x :=
by simp [snd,bimap_bimap]
@[higher_order snd_comp_snd]
lemma comp_snd {α β₀ β₁ β₂}
(g : β₀ → β₁) (g' : β₁ → β₂) (x : F α β₀) :
snd g' (snd g x) = snd (g' ∘ g) x :=
by simp [snd,bimap_bimap]
attribute [functor_norm] bimap_bimap comp_snd comp_fst
snd_comp_snd snd_comp_fst fst_comp_snd fst_comp_fst bimap_comp_bimap
bimap_id_id fst_id snd_id
end bifunctor
open functor
instance : bifunctor prod :=
{ bimap := @prod.map }
instance : is_lawful_bifunctor prod :=
by refine { .. }; intros; cases x; refl
instance bifunctor.const : bifunctor const :=
{ bimap := (λ α α' β β f _, f) }
instance is_lawful_bifunctor.const : is_lawful_bifunctor const :=
by refine { .. }; intros; refl
instance bifunctor.flip : bifunctor (flip F) :=
{ bimap := (λ α α' β β' f f' x, (bimap f' f x : F β' α')) }
instance is_lawful_bifunctor.flip [is_lawful_bifunctor F] : is_lawful_bifunctor (flip F) :=
by refine { .. }; intros; simp [bimap] with functor_norm
instance : bifunctor sum :=
{ bimap := @sum.map }
instance : is_lawful_bifunctor sum :=
by refine { .. }; intros; cases x; refl
open bifunctor functor
@[priority 10]
instance bifunctor.functor {α} : functor (F α) :=
{ map := λ _ _, snd }
@[priority 10]
instance bifunctor.is_lawful_functor [is_lawful_bifunctor F] {α} : is_lawful_functor (F α) :=
by refine {..}; intros; simp [functor.map] with functor_norm
section bicompl
variables (G : Type* → Type u₀) (H : Type* → Type u₁) [functor G] [functor H]
instance : bifunctor (bicompl F G H) :=
{ bimap := λ α α' β β' f f' x, (bimap (map f) (map f') x : F (G α') (H β')) }
instance [is_lawful_functor G] [is_lawful_functor H] [is_lawful_bifunctor F] :
is_lawful_bifunctor (bicompl F G H) :=
by constructor; intros; simp [bimap,map_id,map_comp_map] with functor_norm
end bicompl
section bicompr
variables (G : Type u₂ → Type*) [functor G]
instance : bifunctor (bicompr G F) :=
{ bimap := λ α α' β β' f f' x, (map (bimap f f') x : G (F α' β')) }
instance [is_lawful_functor G] [is_lawful_bifunctor F] :
is_lawful_bifunctor (bicompr G F) :=
by constructor; intros; simp [bimap] with functor_norm
end bicompr
|
9ab9350f183984060508abc199b43eb84f1b82bf | 77c5b91fae1b966ddd1db969ba37b6f0e4901e88 | /src/linear_algebra/affine_space/affine_subspace.lean | 23cc0f3b1123067597c6b7474ff285b0ffba2519 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dexmagic/mathlib | ff48eefc56e2412429b31d4fddd41a976eb287ce | 7a5d15a955a92a90e1d398b2281916b9c41270b2 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,481,322,046 | 1,633,360,193,000 | 1,633,360,193,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 45,973 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import linear_algebra.affine_space.basic
import linear_algebra.tensor_product
import data.set.intervals.unordered_interval
/-!
# Affine spaces
This file defines affine subspaces (over modules) and the affine span of a set of points.
## Main definitions
* `affine_subspace k P` is the type of affine subspaces. Unlike
affine spaces, affine subspaces are allowed to be empty, and lemmas
that do not apply to empty affine subspaces have `nonempty`
hypotheses. There is a `complete_lattice` structure on affine
subspaces.
* `affine_subspace.direction` gives the `submodule` spanned by the
pairwise differences of points in an `affine_subspace`. There are
various lemmas relating to the set of vectors in the `direction`,
and relating the lattice structure on affine subspaces to that on
their directions.
* `affine_span` gives the affine subspace spanned by a set of points,
with `vector_span` giving its direction. `affine_span` is defined
in terms of `span_points`, which gives an explicit description of
the points contained in the affine span; `span_points` itself should
generally only be used when that description is required, with
`affine_span` being the main definition for other purposes. Two
other descriptions of the affine span are proved equivalent: it is
the `Inf` of affine subspaces containing the points, and (if
`[nontrivial k]`) it contains exactly those points that are affine
combinations of points in the given set.
## Implementation notes
`out_param` is used in the definiton of `add_torsor V P` to make `V` an implicit argument (deduced
from `P`) in most cases; `include V` is needed in many cases for `V`, and type classes using it, to
be added as implicit arguments to individual lemmas. As for modules, `k` is an explicit argument
rather than implied by `P` or `V`.
This file only provides purely algebraic definitions and results.
Those depending on analysis or topology are defined elsewhere; see
`analysis.normed_space.add_torsor` and `topology.algebra.affine`.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affine_space
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principal_homogeneous_space
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale big_operators classical affine
open set
section
variables (k : Type*) {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [ring k] [add_comm_group V] [module k V]
variables [affine_space V P]
include V
/-- The submodule spanning the differences of a (possibly empty) set
of points. -/
def vector_span (s : set P) : submodule k V := submodule.span k (s -ᵥ s)
/-- The definition of `vector_span`, for rewriting. -/
lemma vector_span_def (s : set P) : vector_span k s = submodule.span k (s -ᵥ s) :=
rfl
/-- `vector_span` is monotone. -/
lemma vector_span_mono {s₁ s₂ : set P} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : vector_span k s₁ ≤ vector_span k s₂ :=
submodule.span_mono (vsub_self_mono h)
variables (P)
/-- The `vector_span` of the empty set is `⊥`. -/
@[simp] lemma vector_span_empty : vector_span k (∅ : set P) = (⊥ : submodule k V) :=
by rw [vector_span_def, vsub_empty, submodule.span_empty]
variables {P}
/-- The `vector_span` of a single point is `⊥`. -/
@[simp] lemma vector_span_singleton (p : P) : vector_span k ({p} : set P) = ⊥ :=
by simp [vector_span_def]
/-- The `s -ᵥ s` lies within the `vector_span k s`. -/
lemma vsub_set_subset_vector_span (s : set P) : s -ᵥ s ⊆ ↑(vector_span k s) :=
submodule.subset_span
/-- Each pairwise difference is in the `vector_span`. -/
lemma vsub_mem_vector_span {s : set P} {p1 p2 : P} (hp1 : p1 ∈ s) (hp2 : p2 ∈ s) :
p1 -ᵥ p2 ∈ vector_span k s :=
vsub_set_subset_vector_span k s (vsub_mem_vsub hp1 hp2)
/-- The points in the affine span of a (possibly empty) set of
points. Use `affine_span` instead to get an `affine_subspace k P`. -/
def span_points (s : set P) : set P :=
{p | ∃ p1 ∈ s, ∃ v ∈ (vector_span k s), p = v +ᵥ p1}
/-- A point in a set is in its affine span. -/
lemma mem_span_points (p : P) (s : set P) : p ∈ s → p ∈ span_points k s
| hp := ⟨p, hp, 0, submodule.zero_mem _, (zero_vadd V p).symm⟩
/-- A set is contained in its `span_points`. -/
lemma subset_span_points (s : set P) : s ⊆ span_points k s :=
λ p, mem_span_points k p s
/-- The `span_points` of a set is nonempty if and only if that set
is. -/
@[simp] lemma span_points_nonempty (s : set P) :
(span_points k s).nonempty ↔ s.nonempty :=
begin
split,
{ contrapose,
rw [set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty],
intro h,
simp [h, span_points] },
{ exact λ h, h.mono (subset_span_points _ _) }
end
/-- Adding a point in the affine span and a vector in the spanning
submodule produces a point in the affine span. -/
lemma vadd_mem_span_points_of_mem_span_points_of_mem_vector_span {s : set P} {p : P} {v : V}
(hp : p ∈ span_points k s) (hv : v ∈ vector_span k s) : v +ᵥ p ∈ span_points k s :=
begin
rcases hp with ⟨p2, ⟨hp2, ⟨v2, ⟨hv2, hv2p⟩⟩⟩⟩,
rw [hv2p, vadd_vadd],
use [p2, hp2, v + v2, (vector_span k s).add_mem hv hv2, rfl]
end
/-- Subtracting two points in the affine span produces a vector in the
spanning submodule. -/
lemma vsub_mem_vector_span_of_mem_span_points_of_mem_span_points {s : set P} {p1 p2 : P}
(hp1 : p1 ∈ span_points k s) (hp2 : p2 ∈ span_points k s) :
p1 -ᵥ p2 ∈ vector_span k s :=
begin
rcases hp1 with ⟨p1a, ⟨hp1a, ⟨v1, ⟨hv1, hv1p⟩⟩⟩⟩,
rcases hp2 with ⟨p2a, ⟨hp2a, ⟨v2, ⟨hv2, hv2p⟩⟩⟩⟩,
rw [hv1p, hv2p, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub (v1 +ᵥ p1a), vadd_vsub_assoc, add_comm, add_sub_assoc],
have hv1v2 : v1 - v2 ∈ vector_span k s,
{ rw sub_eq_add_neg,
apply (vector_span k s).add_mem hv1,
rw ←neg_one_smul k v2,
exact (vector_span k s).smul_mem (-1 : k) hv2 },
refine (vector_span k s).add_mem _ hv1v2,
exact vsub_mem_vector_span k hp1a hp2a
end
end
/-- An `affine_subspace k P` is a subset of an `affine_space V P`
that, if not empty, has an affine space structure induced by a
corresponding subspace of the `module k V`. -/
structure affine_subspace (k : Type*) {V : Type*} (P : Type*) [ring k] [add_comm_group V]
[module k V] [affine_space V P] :=
(carrier : set P)
(smul_vsub_vadd_mem : ∀ (c : k) {p1 p2 p3 : P}, p1 ∈ carrier → p2 ∈ carrier → p3 ∈ carrier →
c • (p1 -ᵥ p2 : V) +ᵥ p3 ∈ carrier)
namespace submodule
variables {k V : Type*} [ring k] [add_comm_group V] [module k V]
/-- Reinterpret `p : submodule k V` as an `affine_subspace k V`. -/
def to_affine_subspace (p : submodule k V) : affine_subspace k V :=
{ carrier := p,
smul_vsub_vadd_mem := λ c p₁ p₂ p₃ h₁ h₂ h₃, p.add_mem (p.smul_mem _ (p.sub_mem h₁ h₂)) h₃ }
end submodule
namespace affine_subspace
variables (k : Type*) {V : Type*} (P : Type*) [ring k] [add_comm_group V] [module k V]
[affine_space V P]
include V
instance : has_coe (affine_subspace k P) (set P) := ⟨carrier⟩
instance : has_mem P (affine_subspace k P) := ⟨λ p s, p ∈ (s : set P)⟩
/-- A point is in an affine subspace coerced to a set if and only if
it is in that affine subspace. -/
@[simp] lemma mem_coe (p : P) (s : affine_subspace k P) :
p ∈ (s : set P) ↔ p ∈ s :=
iff.rfl
variables {k P}
/-- The direction of an affine subspace is the submodule spanned by
the pairwise differences of points. (Except in the case of an empty
affine subspace, where the direction is the zero submodule, every
vector in the direction is the difference of two points in the affine
subspace.) -/
def direction (s : affine_subspace k P) : submodule k V := vector_span k (s : set P)
/-- The direction equals the `vector_span`. -/
lemma direction_eq_vector_span (s : affine_subspace k P) :
s.direction = vector_span k (s : set P) :=
rfl
/-- Alternative definition of the direction when the affine subspace
is nonempty. This is defined so that the order on submodules (as used
in the definition of `submodule.span`) can be used in the proof of
`coe_direction_eq_vsub_set`, and is not intended to be used beyond
that proof. -/
def direction_of_nonempty {s : affine_subspace k P} (h : (s : set P).nonempty) :
submodule k V :=
{ carrier := (s : set P) -ᵥ s,
zero_mem' := begin
cases h with p hp,
exact (vsub_self p) ▸ vsub_mem_vsub hp hp
end,
add_mem' := begin
intros a b ha hb,
rcases ha with ⟨p1, p2, hp1, hp2, rfl⟩,
rcases hb with ⟨p3, p4, hp3, hp4, rfl⟩,
rw [←vadd_vsub_assoc],
refine vsub_mem_vsub _ hp4,
convert s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem 1 hp1 hp2 hp3,
rw one_smul
end,
smul_mem' := begin
intros c v hv,
rcases hv with ⟨p1, p2, hp1, hp2, rfl⟩,
rw [←vadd_vsub (c • (p1 -ᵥ p2)) p2],
refine vsub_mem_vsub _ hp2,
exact s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem c hp1 hp2 hp2
end }
/-- `direction_of_nonempty` gives the same submodule as
`direction`. -/
lemma direction_of_nonempty_eq_direction {s : affine_subspace k P} (h : (s : set P).nonempty) :
direction_of_nonempty h = s.direction :=
le_antisymm (vsub_set_subset_vector_span k s) (submodule.span_le.2 set.subset.rfl)
/-- The set of vectors in the direction of a nonempty affine subspace
is given by `vsub_set`. -/
lemma coe_direction_eq_vsub_set {s : affine_subspace k P} (h : (s : set P).nonempty) :
(s.direction : set V) = (s : set P) -ᵥ s :=
direction_of_nonempty_eq_direction h ▸ rfl
/-- A vector is in the direction of a nonempty affine subspace if and
only if it is the subtraction of two vectors in the subspace. -/
lemma mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub {s : affine_subspace k P} (h : (s : set P).nonempty) (v : V) :
v ∈ s.direction ↔ ∃ p1 ∈ s, ∃ p2 ∈ s, v = p1 -ᵥ p2 :=
begin
rw [←set_like.mem_coe, coe_direction_eq_vsub_set h],
exact ⟨λ ⟨p1, p2, hp1, hp2, hv⟩, ⟨p1, hp1, p2, hp2, hv.symm⟩,
λ ⟨p1, hp1, p2, hp2, hv⟩, ⟨p1, p2, hp1, hp2, hv.symm⟩⟩
end
/-- Adding a vector in the direction to a point in the subspace
produces a point in the subspace. -/
lemma vadd_mem_of_mem_direction {s : affine_subspace k P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) {p : P}
(hp : p ∈ s) : v +ᵥ p ∈ s :=
begin
rw mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub ⟨p, hp⟩ at hv,
rcases hv with ⟨p1, hp1, p2, hp2, hv⟩,
rw hv,
convert s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem 1 hp1 hp2 hp,
rw one_smul
end
/-- Subtracting two points in the subspace produces a vector in the
direction. -/
lemma vsub_mem_direction {s : affine_subspace k P} {p1 p2 : P} (hp1 : p1 ∈ s) (hp2 : p2 ∈ s) :
(p1 -ᵥ p2) ∈ s.direction :=
vsub_mem_vector_span k hp1 hp2
/-- Adding a vector to a point in a subspace produces a point in the
subspace if and only if the vector is in the direction. -/
lemma vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction {s : affine_subspace k P} (v : V) {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) :
v +ᵥ p ∈ s ↔ v ∈ s.direction :=
⟨λ h, by simpa using vsub_mem_direction h hp, λ h, vadd_mem_of_mem_direction h hp⟩
/-- Given a point in an affine subspace, the set of vectors in its
direction equals the set of vectors subtracting that point on the
right. -/
lemma coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_right {s : affine_subspace k P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) :
(s.direction : set V) = (-ᵥ p) '' s :=
begin
rw coe_direction_eq_vsub_set ⟨p, hp⟩,
refine le_antisymm _ _,
{ rintros v ⟨p1, p2, hp1, hp2, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨p1 -ᵥ p2 +ᵥ p,
vadd_mem_of_mem_direction (vsub_mem_direction hp1 hp2) hp,
(vadd_vsub _ _)⟩ },
{ rintros v ⟨p2, hp2, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨p2, p, hp2, hp, rfl⟩ }
end
/-- Given a point in an affine subspace, the set of vectors in its
direction equals the set of vectors subtracting that point on the
left. -/
lemma coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_left {s : affine_subspace k P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) :
(s.direction : set V) = (-ᵥ) p '' s :=
begin
ext v,
rw [set_like.mem_coe, ←submodule.neg_mem_iff, ←set_like.mem_coe,
coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_right hp, set.mem_image_iff_bex, set.mem_image_iff_bex],
conv_lhs { congr, funext, rw [←neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_inj] }
end
/-- Given a point in an affine subspace, a vector is in its direction
if and only if it results from subtracting that point on the right. -/
lemma mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub_right {s : affine_subspace k P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) (v : V) :
v ∈ s.direction ↔ ∃ p2 ∈ s, v = p2 -ᵥ p :=
begin
rw [←set_like.mem_coe, coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_right hp],
exact ⟨λ ⟨p2, hp2, hv⟩, ⟨p2, hp2, hv.symm⟩, λ ⟨p2, hp2, hv⟩, ⟨p2, hp2, hv.symm⟩⟩
end
/-- Given a point in an affine subspace, a vector is in its direction
if and only if it results from subtracting that point on the left. -/
lemma mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub_left {s : affine_subspace k P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) (v : V) :
v ∈ s.direction ↔ ∃ p2 ∈ s, v = p -ᵥ p2 :=
begin
rw [←set_like.mem_coe, coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_left hp],
exact ⟨λ ⟨p2, hp2, hv⟩, ⟨p2, hp2, hv.symm⟩, λ ⟨p2, hp2, hv⟩, ⟨p2, hp2, hv.symm⟩⟩
end
/-- Given a point in an affine subspace, a result of subtracting that
point on the right is in the direction if and only if the other point
is in the subspace. -/
lemma vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem {s : affine_subspace k P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) (p2 : P) :
p2 -ᵥ p ∈ s.direction ↔ p2 ∈ s :=
begin
rw mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub_right hp,
simp
end
/-- Given a point in an affine subspace, a result of subtracting that
point on the left is in the direction if and only if the other point
is in the subspace. -/
lemma vsub_left_mem_direction_iff_mem {s : affine_subspace k P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) (p2 : P) :
p -ᵥ p2 ∈ s.direction ↔ p2 ∈ s :=
begin
rw mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub_left hp,
simp
end
/-- Two affine subspaces are equal if they have the same points. -/
@[ext] lemma ext {s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P} (h : (s1 : set P) = s2) : s1 = s2 :=
begin
cases s1,
cases s2,
congr,
exact h
end
@[simp] lemma ext_iff (s₁ s₂ : affine_subspace k P) :
(s₁ : set P) = s₂ ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
⟨ext, by tidy⟩
/-- Two affine subspaces with the same direction and nonempty
intersection are equal. -/
lemma ext_of_direction_eq {s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P} (hd : s1.direction = s2.direction)
(hn : ((s1 : set P) ∩ s2).nonempty) : s1 = s2 :=
begin
ext p,
have hq1 := set.mem_of_mem_inter_left hn.some_mem,
have hq2 := set.mem_of_mem_inter_right hn.some_mem,
split,
{ intro hp,
rw ←vsub_vadd p hn.some,
refine vadd_mem_of_mem_direction _ hq2,
rw ←hd,
exact vsub_mem_direction hp hq1 },
{ intro hp,
rw ←vsub_vadd p hn.some,
refine vadd_mem_of_mem_direction _ hq1,
rw hd,
exact vsub_mem_direction hp hq2 }
end
instance to_add_torsor (s : affine_subspace k P) [nonempty s] : add_torsor s.direction s :=
{ vadd := λ a b, ⟨(a:V) +ᵥ (b:P), vadd_mem_of_mem_direction a.2 b.2⟩,
zero_vadd := by simp,
add_vadd := λ a b c, by { ext, apply add_vadd },
vsub := λ a b, ⟨(a:P) -ᵥ (b:P), (vsub_left_mem_direction_iff_mem a.2 _).mpr b.2 ⟩,
nonempty := by apply_instance,
vsub_vadd' := λ a b, by { ext, apply add_torsor.vsub_vadd' },
vadd_vsub' := λ a b, by { ext, apply add_torsor.vadd_vsub' } }
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_vsub (s : affine_subspace k P) [nonempty s] (a b : s) :
↑(a -ᵥ b) = (a:P) -ᵥ (b:P) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_vadd (s : affine_subspace k P) [nonempty s] (a : s.direction) (b : s) :
↑(a +ᵥ b) = (a:V) +ᵥ (b:P) :=
rfl
/-- Two affine subspaces with nonempty intersection are equal if and
only if their directions are equal. -/
lemma eq_iff_direction_eq_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : affine_subspace k P} {p : P} (h₁ : p ∈ s₁)
(h₂ : p ∈ s₂) : s₁ = s₂ ↔ s₁.direction = s₂.direction :=
⟨λ h, h ▸ rfl, λ h, ext_of_direction_eq h ⟨p, h₁, h₂⟩⟩
/-- Construct an affine subspace from a point and a direction. -/
def mk' (p : P) (direction : submodule k V) : affine_subspace k P :=
{ carrier := {q | ∃ v ∈ direction, q = v +ᵥ p},
smul_vsub_vadd_mem := λ c p1 p2 p3 hp1 hp2 hp3, begin
rcases hp1 with ⟨v1, hv1, hp1⟩,
rcases hp2 with ⟨v2, hv2, hp2⟩,
rcases hp3 with ⟨v3, hv3, hp3⟩,
use [c • (v1 - v2) + v3,
direction.add_mem (direction.smul_mem c (direction.sub_mem hv1 hv2)) hv3],
simp [hp1, hp2, hp3, vadd_vadd]
end }
/-- An affine subspace constructed from a point and a direction contains
that point. -/
lemma self_mem_mk' (p : P) (direction : submodule k V) :
p ∈ mk' p direction :=
⟨0, ⟨direction.zero_mem, (zero_vadd _ _).symm⟩⟩
/-- An affine subspace constructed from a point and a direction contains
the result of adding a vector in that direction to that point. -/
lemma vadd_mem_mk' {v : V} (p : P) {direction : submodule k V} (hv : v ∈ direction) :
v +ᵥ p ∈ mk' p direction :=
⟨v, hv, rfl⟩
/-- An affine subspace constructed from a point and a direction is
nonempty. -/
lemma mk'_nonempty (p : P) (direction : submodule k V) : (mk' p direction : set P).nonempty :=
⟨p, self_mem_mk' p direction⟩
/-- The direction of an affine subspace constructed from a point and a
direction. -/
@[simp] lemma direction_mk' (p : P) (direction : submodule k V) :
(mk' p direction).direction = direction :=
begin
ext v,
rw mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub (mk'_nonempty _ _),
split,
{ rintros ⟨p1, ⟨v1, hv1, hp1⟩, p2, ⟨v2, hv2, hp2⟩, hv⟩,
rw [hv, hp1, hp2, vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_right],
exact direction.sub_mem hv1 hv2 },
{ exact λ hv, ⟨v +ᵥ p, vadd_mem_mk' _ hv, p,
self_mem_mk' _ _, (vadd_vsub _ _).symm⟩ }
end
/-- Constructing an affine subspace from a point in a subspace and
that subspace's direction yields the original subspace. -/
@[simp] lemma mk'_eq {s : affine_subspace k P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) : mk' p s.direction = s :=
ext_of_direction_eq (direction_mk' p s.direction)
⟨p, set.mem_inter (self_mem_mk' _ _) hp⟩
/-- If an affine subspace contains a set of points, it contains the
`span_points` of that set. -/
lemma span_points_subset_coe_of_subset_coe {s : set P} {s1 : affine_subspace k P} (h : s ⊆ s1) :
span_points k s ⊆ s1 :=
begin
rintros p ⟨p1, hp1, v, hv, hp⟩,
rw hp,
have hp1s1 : p1 ∈ (s1 : set P) := set.mem_of_mem_of_subset hp1 h,
refine vadd_mem_of_mem_direction _ hp1s1,
have hs : vector_span k s ≤ s1.direction := vector_span_mono k h,
rw set_like.le_def at hs,
rw ←set_like.mem_coe,
exact set.mem_of_mem_of_subset hv hs
end
end affine_subspace
section affine_span
variables (k : Type*) {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [ring k] [add_comm_group V] [module k V]
[affine_space V P]
include V
/-- The affine span of a set of points is the smallest affine subspace
containing those points. (Actually defined here in terms of spans in
modules.) -/
def affine_span (s : set P) : affine_subspace k P :=
{ carrier := span_points k s,
smul_vsub_vadd_mem := λ c p1 p2 p3 hp1 hp2 hp3,
vadd_mem_span_points_of_mem_span_points_of_mem_vector_span k hp3
((vector_span k s).smul_mem c
(vsub_mem_vector_span_of_mem_span_points_of_mem_span_points k hp1 hp2)) }
/-- The affine span, converted to a set, is `span_points`. -/
@[simp] lemma coe_affine_span (s : set P) :
(affine_span k s : set P) = span_points k s :=
rfl
/-- A set is contained in its affine span. -/
lemma subset_affine_span (s : set P) : s ⊆ affine_span k s :=
subset_span_points k s
/-- The direction of the affine span is the `vector_span`. -/
lemma direction_affine_span (s : set P) : (affine_span k s).direction = vector_span k s :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ refine submodule.span_le.2 _,
rintros v ⟨p1, p3, ⟨p2, hp2, v1, hv1, hp1⟩, ⟨p4, hp4, v2, hv2, hp3⟩, rfl⟩,
rw [hp1, hp3, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vadd_vsub_assoc, set_like.mem_coe],
exact (vector_span k s).sub_mem ((vector_span k s).add_mem hv1
(vsub_mem_vector_span k hp2 hp4)) hv2 },
{ exact vector_span_mono k (subset_span_points k s) }
end
/-- A point in a set is in its affine span. -/
lemma mem_affine_span {p : P} {s : set P} (hp : p ∈ s) : p ∈ affine_span k s :=
mem_span_points k p s hp
end affine_span
namespace affine_subspace
variables {k : Type*} {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [ring k] [add_comm_group V] [module k V]
[S : affine_space V P]
include S
instance : complete_lattice (affine_subspace k P) :=
{ sup := λ s1 s2, affine_span k (s1 ∪ s2),
le_sup_left := λ s1 s2, set.subset.trans (set.subset_union_left s1 s2)
(subset_span_points k _),
le_sup_right := λ s1 s2, set.subset.trans (set.subset_union_right s1 s2)
(subset_span_points k _),
sup_le := λ s1 s2 s3 hs1 hs2, span_points_subset_coe_of_subset_coe (set.union_subset hs1 hs2),
inf := λ s1 s2, mk (s1 ∩ s2)
(λ c p1 p2 p3 hp1 hp2 hp3,
⟨s1.smul_vsub_vadd_mem c hp1.1 hp2.1 hp3.1,
s2.smul_vsub_vadd_mem c hp1.2 hp2.2 hp3.2⟩),
inf_le_left := λ _ _, set.inter_subset_left _ _,
inf_le_right := λ _ _, set.inter_subset_right _ _,
le_inf := λ _ _ _, set.subset_inter,
top := { carrier := set.univ,
smul_vsub_vadd_mem := λ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, set.mem_univ _ },
le_top := λ _ _ _, set.mem_univ _,
bot := { carrier := ∅,
smul_vsub_vadd_mem := λ _ _ _ _, false.elim },
bot_le := λ _ _, false.elim,
Sup := λ s, affine_span k (⋃ s' ∈ s, (s' : set P)),
Inf := λ s, mk (⋂ s' ∈ s, (s' : set P))
(λ c p1 p2 p3 hp1 hp2 hp3, set.mem_bInter_iff.2 $ λ s2 hs2,
s2.smul_vsub_vadd_mem c (set.mem_bInter_iff.1 hp1 s2 hs2)
(set.mem_bInter_iff.1 hp2 s2 hs2)
(set.mem_bInter_iff.1 hp3 s2 hs2)),
le_Sup := λ _ _ h, set.subset.trans (set.subset_bUnion_of_mem h) (subset_span_points k _),
Sup_le := λ _ _ h, span_points_subset_coe_of_subset_coe (set.bUnion_subset h),
Inf_le := λ _ _, set.bInter_subset_of_mem,
le_Inf := λ _ _, set.subset_bInter,
.. partial_order.lift (coe : affine_subspace k P → set P) (λ _ _, ext) }
instance : inhabited (affine_subspace k P) := ⟨⊤⟩
/-- The `≤` order on subspaces is the same as that on the corresponding
sets. -/
lemma le_def (s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P) : s1 ≤ s2 ↔ (s1 : set P) ⊆ s2 :=
iff.rfl
/-- One subspace is less than or equal to another if and only if all
its points are in the second subspace. -/
lemma le_def' (s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P) : s1 ≤ s2 ↔ ∀ p ∈ s1, p ∈ s2 :=
iff.rfl
/-- The `<` order on subspaces is the same as that on the corresponding
sets. -/
lemma lt_def (s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P) : s1 < s2 ↔ (s1 : set P) ⊂ s2 :=
iff.rfl
/-- One subspace is not less than or equal to another if and only if
it has a point not in the second subspace. -/
lemma not_le_iff_exists (s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P) : ¬ s1 ≤ s2 ↔ ∃ p ∈ s1, p ∉ s2 :=
set.not_subset
/-- If a subspace is less than another, there is a point only in the
second. -/
lemma exists_of_lt {s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P} (h : s1 < s2) : ∃ p ∈ s2, p ∉ s1 :=
set.exists_of_ssubset h
/-- A subspace is less than another if and only if it is less than or
equal to the second subspace and there is a point only in the
second. -/
lemma lt_iff_le_and_exists (s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P) : s1 < s2 ↔ s1 ≤ s2 ∧ ∃ p ∈ s2, p ∉ s1 :=
by rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, not_le_iff_exists]
/-- If an affine subspace is nonempty and contained in another with
the same direction, they are equal. -/
lemma eq_of_direction_eq_of_nonempty_of_le {s₁ s₂ : affine_subspace k P}
(hd : s₁.direction = s₂.direction) (hn : (s₁ : set P).nonempty) (hle : s₁ ≤ s₂) :
s₁ = s₂ :=
let ⟨p, hp⟩ := hn in ext_of_direction_eq hd ⟨p, hp, hle hp⟩
variables (k V)
/-- The affine span is the `Inf` of subspaces containing the given
points. -/
lemma affine_span_eq_Inf (s : set P) : affine_span k s = Inf {s' | s ⊆ s'} :=
le_antisymm (span_points_subset_coe_of_subset_coe (set.subset_bInter (λ _ h, h)))
(Inf_le (subset_span_points k _))
variables (P)
/-- The Galois insertion formed by `affine_span` and coercion back to
a set. -/
protected def gi : galois_insertion (affine_span k) (coe : affine_subspace k P → set P) :=
{ choice := λ s _, affine_span k s,
gc := λ s1 s2, ⟨λ h, set.subset.trans (subset_span_points k s1) h,
span_points_subset_coe_of_subset_coe⟩,
le_l_u := λ _, subset_span_points k _,
choice_eq := λ _ _, rfl }
/-- The span of the empty set is `⊥`. -/
@[simp] lemma span_empty : affine_span k (∅ : set P) = ⊥ :=
(affine_subspace.gi k V P).gc.l_bot
/-- The span of `univ` is `⊤`. -/
@[simp] lemma span_univ : affine_span k (set.univ : set P) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 $ subset_span_points k _
variables {P}
/-- The affine span of a single point, coerced to a set, contains just
that point. -/
@[simp] lemma coe_affine_span_singleton (p : P) : (affine_span k ({p} : set P) : set P) = {p} :=
begin
ext x,
rw [mem_coe, ←vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem (mem_affine_span k (set.mem_singleton p)) _,
direction_affine_span],
simp
end
/-- A point is in the affine span of a single point if and only if
they are equal. -/
@[simp] lemma mem_affine_span_singleton (p1 p2 : P) :
p1 ∈ affine_span k ({p2} : set P) ↔ p1 = p2 :=
by simp [←mem_coe]
/-- The span of a union of sets is the sup of their spans. -/
lemma span_union (s t : set P) : affine_span k (s ∪ t) = affine_span k s ⊔ affine_span k t :=
(affine_subspace.gi k V P).gc.l_sup
/-- The span of a union of an indexed family of sets is the sup of
their spans. -/
lemma span_Union {ι : Type*} (s : ι → set P) :
affine_span k (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, affine_span k (s i) :=
(affine_subspace.gi k V P).gc.l_supr
variables (P)
/-- `⊤`, coerced to a set, is the whole set of points. -/
@[simp] lemma top_coe : ((⊤ : affine_subspace k P) : set P) = set.univ :=
rfl
variables {P}
/-- All points are in `⊤`. -/
lemma mem_top (p : P) : p ∈ (⊤ : affine_subspace k P) :=
set.mem_univ p
variables (P)
/-- The direction of `⊤` is the whole module as a submodule. -/
@[simp] lemma direction_top : (⊤ : affine_subspace k P).direction = ⊤ :=
begin
cases S.nonempty with p,
ext v,
refine ⟨imp_intro submodule.mem_top, λ hv, _⟩,
have hpv : (v +ᵥ p -ᵥ p : V) ∈ (⊤ : affine_subspace k P).direction :=
vsub_mem_direction (mem_top k V _) (mem_top k V _),
rwa vadd_vsub at hpv
end
/-- `⊥`, coerced to a set, is the empty set. -/
@[simp] lemma bot_coe : ((⊥ : affine_subspace k P) : set P) = ∅ :=
rfl
lemma bot_ne_top : (⊥ : affine_subspace k P) ≠ ⊤ :=
begin
intros contra,
rw [← ext_iff, bot_coe, top_coe] at contra,
exact set.empty_ne_univ contra,
end
lemma nonempty_of_affine_span_eq_top {s : set P} (h : affine_span k s = ⊤) : s.nonempty :=
begin
rw ← set.ne_empty_iff_nonempty,
rintros rfl,
rw affine_subspace.span_empty at h,
exact bot_ne_top k V P h,
end
variables {P}
/-- No points are in `⊥`. -/
lemma not_mem_bot (p : P) : p ∉ (⊥ : affine_subspace k P) :=
set.not_mem_empty p
variables (P)
/-- The direction of `⊥` is the submodule `⊥`. -/
@[simp] lemma direction_bot : (⊥ : affine_subspace k P).direction = ⊥ :=
by rw [direction_eq_vector_span, bot_coe, vector_span_def, vsub_empty, submodule.span_empty]
variables {k V P}
/-- A nonempty affine subspace is `⊤` if and only if its direction is
`⊤`. -/
@[simp] lemma direction_eq_top_iff_of_nonempty {s : affine_subspace k P}
(h : (s : set P).nonempty) : s.direction = ⊤ ↔ s = ⊤ :=
begin
split,
{ intro hd,
rw ←direction_top k V P at hd,
refine ext_of_direction_eq hd _,
simp [h] },
{ rintro rfl,
simp }
end
/-- The inf of two affine subspaces, coerced to a set, is the
intersection of the two sets of points. -/
@[simp] lemma inf_coe (s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P) : ((s1 ⊓ s2) : set P) = s1 ∩ s2 :=
rfl
/-- A point is in the inf of two affine subspaces if and only if it is
in both of them. -/
lemma mem_inf_iff (p : P) (s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P) : p ∈ s1 ⊓ s2 ↔ p ∈ s1 ∧ p ∈ s2 :=
iff.rfl
/-- The direction of the inf of two affine subspaces is less than or
equal to the inf of their directions. -/
lemma direction_inf (s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P) :
(s1 ⊓ s2).direction ≤ s1.direction ⊓ s2.direction :=
begin
repeat { rw [direction_eq_vector_span, vector_span_def] },
exact le_inf
(Inf_le_Inf (λ p hp, trans (vsub_self_mono (inter_subset_left _ _)) hp))
(Inf_le_Inf (λ p hp, trans (vsub_self_mono (inter_subset_right _ _)) hp))
end
/-- If two affine subspaces have a point in common, the direction of
their inf equals the inf of their directions. -/
lemma direction_inf_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : affine_subspace k P} {p : P} (h₁ : p ∈ s₁) (h₂ : p ∈ s₂) :
(s₁ ⊓ s₂).direction = s₁.direction ⊓ s₂.direction :=
begin
ext v,
rw [submodule.mem_inf, ←vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction v h₁, ←vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction v h₂,
←vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction v ((mem_inf_iff p s₁ s₂).2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩), mem_inf_iff]
end
/-- If two affine subspaces have a point in their inf, the direction
of their inf equals the inf of their directions. -/
lemma direction_inf_of_mem_inf {s₁ s₂ : affine_subspace k P} {p : P} (h : p ∈ s₁ ⊓ s₂) :
(s₁ ⊓ s₂).direction = s₁.direction ⊓ s₂.direction :=
direction_inf_of_mem ((mem_inf_iff p s₁ s₂).1 h).1 ((mem_inf_iff p s₁ s₂).1 h).2
/-- If one affine subspace is less than or equal to another, the same
applies to their directions. -/
lemma direction_le {s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P} (h : s1 ≤ s2) : s1.direction ≤ s2.direction :=
begin
repeat { rw [direction_eq_vector_span, vector_span_def] },
exact vector_span_mono k h
end
/-- If one nonempty affine subspace is less than another, the same
applies to their directions -/
lemma direction_lt_of_nonempty {s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P} (h : s1 < s2)
(hn : (s1 : set P).nonempty) : s1.direction < s2.direction :=
begin
cases hn with p hp,
rw lt_iff_le_and_exists at h,
rcases h with ⟨hle, p2, hp2, hp2s1⟩,
rw set_like.lt_iff_le_and_exists,
use [direction_le hle, p2 -ᵥ p, vsub_mem_direction hp2 (hle hp)],
intro hm,
rw vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem hp p2 at hm,
exact hp2s1 hm
end
/-- The sup of the directions of two affine subspaces is less than or
equal to the direction of their sup. -/
lemma sup_direction_le (s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P) :
s1.direction ⊔ s2.direction ≤ (s1 ⊔ s2).direction :=
begin
repeat { rw [direction_eq_vector_span, vector_span_def] },
exact sup_le
(Inf_le_Inf (λ p hp, set.subset.trans (vsub_self_mono (le_sup_left : s1 ≤ s1 ⊔ s2)) hp))
(Inf_le_Inf (λ p hp, set.subset.trans (vsub_self_mono (le_sup_right : s2 ≤ s1 ⊔ s2)) hp))
end
/-- The sup of the directions of two nonempty affine subspaces with
empty intersection is less than the direction of their sup. -/
lemma sup_direction_lt_of_nonempty_of_inter_empty {s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P}
(h1 : (s1 : set P).nonempty) (h2 : (s2 : set P).nonempty) (he : (s1 ∩ s2 : set P) = ∅) :
s1.direction ⊔ s2.direction < (s1 ⊔ s2).direction :=
begin
cases h1 with p1 hp1,
cases h2 with p2 hp2,
rw set_like.lt_iff_le_and_exists,
use [sup_direction_le s1 s2, p2 -ᵥ p1,
vsub_mem_direction ((le_sup_right : s2 ≤ s1 ⊔ s2) hp2) ((le_sup_left : s1 ≤ s1 ⊔ s2) hp1)],
intro h,
rw submodule.mem_sup at h,
rcases h with ⟨v1, hv1, v2, hv2, hv1v2⟩,
rw [←sub_eq_zero, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, add_comm v1, add_assoc,
←vadd_vsub_assoc, ←neg_neg v2, add_comm, ←sub_eq_add_neg, ←vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub,
vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at hv1v2,
refine set.nonempty.ne_empty _ he,
use [v1 +ᵥ p1, vadd_mem_of_mem_direction hv1 hp1],
rw hv1v2,
exact vadd_mem_of_mem_direction (submodule.neg_mem _ hv2) hp2
end
/-- If the directions of two nonempty affine subspaces span the whole
module, they have nonempty intersection. -/
lemma inter_nonempty_of_nonempty_of_sup_direction_eq_top {s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P}
(h1 : (s1 : set P).nonempty) (h2 : (s2 : set P).nonempty)
(hd : s1.direction ⊔ s2.direction = ⊤) : ((s1 : set P) ∩ s2).nonempty :=
begin
by_contradiction h,
rw set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty at h,
have hlt := sup_direction_lt_of_nonempty_of_inter_empty h1 h2 h,
rw hd at hlt,
exact not_top_lt hlt
end
/-- If the directions of two nonempty affine subspaces are complements
of each other, they intersect in exactly one point. -/
lemma inter_eq_singleton_of_nonempty_of_is_compl {s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P}
(h1 : (s1 : set P).nonempty) (h2 : (s2 : set P).nonempty)
(hd : is_compl s1.direction s2.direction) : ∃ p, (s1 : set P) ∩ s2 = {p} :=
begin
cases inter_nonempty_of_nonempty_of_sup_direction_eq_top h1 h2 hd.sup_eq_top with p hp,
use p,
ext q,
rw set.mem_singleton_iff,
split,
{ rintros ⟨hq1, hq2⟩,
have hqp : q -ᵥ p ∈ s1.direction ⊓ s2.direction :=
⟨vsub_mem_direction hq1 hp.1, vsub_mem_direction hq2 hp.2⟩,
rwa [hd.inf_eq_bot, submodule.mem_bot, vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at hqp },
{ exact λ h, h.symm ▸ hp }
end
/-- Coercing a subspace to a set then taking the affine span produces
the original subspace. -/
@[simp] lemma affine_span_coe (s : affine_subspace k P) : affine_span k (s : set P) = s :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ (subset_span_points _ _),
rintros p ⟨p1, hp1, v, hv, rfl⟩,
exact vadd_mem_of_mem_direction hv hp1
end
end affine_subspace
section affine_space'
variables (k : Type*) {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [ring k] [add_comm_group V] [module k V]
[affine_space V P]
variables {ι : Type*}
include V
open affine_subspace set
/-- The `vector_span` is the span of the pairwise subtractions with a
given point on the left. -/
lemma vector_span_eq_span_vsub_set_left {s : set P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) :
vector_span k s = submodule.span k ((-ᵥ) p '' s) :=
begin
rw vector_span_def,
refine le_antisymm _ (submodule.span_mono _),
{ rw submodule.span_le,
rintros v ⟨p1, p2, hp1, hp2, hv⟩,
rw ←vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p1 p2 p at hv,
rw [←hv, set_like.mem_coe, submodule.mem_span],
exact λ m hm, submodule.sub_mem _ (hm ⟨p2, hp2, rfl⟩) (hm ⟨p1, hp1, rfl⟩) },
{ rintros v ⟨p2, hp2, hv⟩,
exact ⟨p, p2, hp, hp2, hv⟩ }
end
/-- The `vector_span` is the span of the pairwise subtractions with a
given point on the right. -/
lemma vector_span_eq_span_vsub_set_right {s : set P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) :
vector_span k s = submodule.span k ((-ᵥ p) '' s) :=
begin
rw vector_span_def,
refine le_antisymm _ (submodule.span_mono _),
{ rw submodule.span_le,
rintros v ⟨p1, p2, hp1, hp2, hv⟩,
rw ←vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right p1 p2 p at hv,
rw [←hv, set_like.mem_coe, submodule.mem_span],
exact λ m hm, submodule.sub_mem _ (hm ⟨p1, hp1, rfl⟩) (hm ⟨p2, hp2, rfl⟩) },
{ rintros v ⟨p2, hp2, hv⟩,
exact ⟨p2, p, hp2, hp, hv⟩ }
end
/-- The `vector_span` is the span of the pairwise subtractions with a
given point on the left, excluding the subtraction of that point from
itself. -/
lemma vector_span_eq_span_vsub_set_left_ne {s : set P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) :
vector_span k s = submodule.span k ((-ᵥ) p '' (s \ {p})) :=
begin
conv_lhs { rw [vector_span_eq_span_vsub_set_left k hp, ←set.insert_eq_of_mem hp,
←set.insert_diff_singleton, set.image_insert_eq] },
simp [submodule.span_insert_eq_span]
end
/-- The `vector_span` is the span of the pairwise subtractions with a
given point on the right, excluding the subtraction of that point from
itself. -/
lemma vector_span_eq_span_vsub_set_right_ne {s : set P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) :
vector_span k s = submodule.span k ((-ᵥ p) '' (s \ {p})) :=
begin
conv_lhs { rw [vector_span_eq_span_vsub_set_right k hp, ←set.insert_eq_of_mem hp,
←set.insert_diff_singleton, set.image_insert_eq] },
simp [submodule.span_insert_eq_span]
end
/-- The `vector_span` is the span of the pairwise subtractions with a
given point on the right, excluding the subtraction of that point from
itself. -/
lemma vector_span_eq_span_vsub_finset_right_ne {s : finset P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) :
vector_span k (s : set P) = submodule.span k ((s.erase p).image (-ᵥ p)) :=
by simp [vector_span_eq_span_vsub_set_right_ne _ (finset.mem_coe.mpr hp)]
/-- The `vector_span` of the image of a function is the span of the
pairwise subtractions with a given point on the left, excluding the
subtraction of that point from itself. -/
lemma vector_span_image_eq_span_vsub_set_left_ne (p : ι → P) {s : set ι} {i : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) :
vector_span k (p '' s) = submodule.span k ((-ᵥ) (p i) '' (p '' (s \ {i}))) :=
begin
conv_lhs { rw [vector_span_eq_span_vsub_set_left k (set.mem_image_of_mem p hi),
←set.insert_eq_of_mem hi, ←set.insert_diff_singleton, set.image_insert_eq,
set.image_insert_eq] },
simp [submodule.span_insert_eq_span]
end
/-- The `vector_span` of the image of a function is the span of the
pairwise subtractions with a given point on the right, excluding the
subtraction of that point from itself. -/
lemma vector_span_image_eq_span_vsub_set_right_ne (p : ι → P) {s : set ι} {i : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) :
vector_span k (p '' s) = submodule.span k ((-ᵥ (p i)) '' (p '' (s \ {i}))) :=
begin
conv_lhs { rw [vector_span_eq_span_vsub_set_right k (set.mem_image_of_mem p hi),
←set.insert_eq_of_mem hi, ←set.insert_diff_singleton, set.image_insert_eq,
set.image_insert_eq] },
simp [submodule.span_insert_eq_span]
end
/-- The `vector_span` of an indexed family is the span of the pairwise
subtractions with a given point on the left. -/
lemma vector_span_range_eq_span_range_vsub_left (p : ι → P) (i0 : ι) :
vector_span k (set.range p) = submodule.span k (set.range (λ (i : ι), p i0 -ᵥ p i)) :=
by rw [vector_span_eq_span_vsub_set_left k (set.mem_range_self i0), ←set.range_comp]
/-- The `vector_span` of an indexed family is the span of the pairwise
subtractions with a given point on the right. -/
lemma vector_span_range_eq_span_range_vsub_right (p : ι → P) (i0 : ι) :
vector_span k (set.range p) = submodule.span k (set.range (λ (i : ι), p i -ᵥ p i0)) :=
by rw [vector_span_eq_span_vsub_set_right k (set.mem_range_self i0), ←set.range_comp]
/-- The `vector_span` of an indexed family is the span of the pairwise
subtractions with a given point on the left, excluding the subtraction
of that point from itself. -/
lemma vector_span_range_eq_span_range_vsub_left_ne (p : ι → P) (i₀ : ι) :
vector_span k (set.range p) = submodule.span k (set.range (λ (i : {x // x ≠ i₀}), p i₀ -ᵥ p i)) :=
begin
rw [←set.image_univ, vector_span_image_eq_span_vsub_set_left_ne k _ (set.mem_univ i₀)],
congr' with v,
simp only [set.mem_range, set.mem_image, set.mem_diff, set.mem_singleton_iff, subtype.exists,
subtype.coe_mk],
split,
{ rintros ⟨x, ⟨i₁, ⟨⟨hi₁u, hi₁⟩, rfl⟩⟩, hv⟩,
exact ⟨i₁, hi₁, hv⟩ },
{ exact λ ⟨i₁, hi₁, hv⟩, ⟨p i₁, ⟨i₁, ⟨set.mem_univ _, hi₁⟩, rfl⟩, hv⟩ }
end
/-- The `vector_span` of an indexed family is the span of the pairwise
subtractions with a given point on the right, excluding the subtraction
of that point from itself. -/
lemma vector_span_range_eq_span_range_vsub_right_ne (p : ι → P) (i₀ : ι) :
vector_span k (set.range p) = submodule.span k (set.range (λ (i : {x // x ≠ i₀}), p i -ᵥ p i₀)) :=
begin
rw [←set.image_univ, vector_span_image_eq_span_vsub_set_right_ne k _ (set.mem_univ i₀)],
congr' with v,
simp only [set.mem_range, set.mem_image, set.mem_diff, set.mem_singleton_iff, subtype.exists,
subtype.coe_mk],
split,
{ rintros ⟨x, ⟨i₁, ⟨⟨hi₁u, hi₁⟩, rfl⟩⟩, hv⟩,
exact ⟨i₁, hi₁, hv⟩ },
{ exact λ ⟨i₁, hi₁, hv⟩, ⟨p i₁, ⟨i₁, ⟨set.mem_univ _, hi₁⟩, rfl⟩, hv⟩ }
end
/-- The affine span of a set is nonempty if and only if that set
is. -/
lemma affine_span_nonempty (s : set P) :
(affine_span k s : set P).nonempty ↔ s.nonempty :=
span_points_nonempty k s
/-- The affine span of a nonempty set is nonempty. -/
instance {s : set P} [nonempty s] : nonempty (affine_span k s) :=
((affine_span_nonempty k s).mpr (nonempty_subtype.mp ‹_›)).to_subtype
variables {k}
/-- Suppose a set of vectors spans `V`. Then a point `p`, together
with those vectors added to `p`, spans `P`. -/
lemma affine_span_singleton_union_vadd_eq_top_of_span_eq_top {s : set V} (p : P)
(h : submodule.span k (set.range (coe : s → V)) = ⊤) :
affine_span k ({p} ∪ (λ v, v +ᵥ p) '' s) = ⊤ :=
begin
convert ext_of_direction_eq _
⟨p,
mem_affine_span k (set.mem_union_left _ (set.mem_singleton _)),
mem_top k V p⟩,
rw [direction_affine_span, direction_top,
vector_span_eq_span_vsub_set_right k
((set.mem_union_left _ (set.mem_singleton _)) : p ∈ _), eq_top_iff, ←h],
apply submodule.span_mono,
rintros v ⟨v', rfl⟩,
use (v' : V) +ᵥ p,
simp
end
variables (k)
/-- `affine_span` is monotone. -/
lemma affine_span_mono {s₁ s₂ : set P} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : affine_span k s₁ ≤ affine_span k s₂ :=
span_points_subset_coe_of_subset_coe (set.subset.trans h (subset_affine_span k _))
/-- Taking the affine span of a set, adding a point and taking the
span again produces the same results as adding the point to the set
and taking the span. -/
lemma affine_span_insert_affine_span (p : P) (ps : set P) :
affine_span k (insert p (affine_span k ps : set P)) = affine_span k (insert p ps) :=
by rw [set.insert_eq, set.insert_eq, span_union, span_union, affine_span_coe]
/-- If a point is in the affine span of a set, adding it to that set
does not change the affine span. -/
lemma affine_span_insert_eq_affine_span {p : P} {ps : set P} (h : p ∈ affine_span k ps) :
affine_span k (insert p ps) = affine_span k ps :=
begin
rw ←mem_coe at h,
rw [←affine_span_insert_affine_span, set.insert_eq_of_mem h, affine_span_coe]
end
end affine_space'
namespace affine_subspace
variables {k : Type*} {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [ring k] [add_comm_group V] [module k V]
[affine_space V P]
include V
/-- The direction of the sup of two nonempty affine subspaces is the
sup of the two directions and of any one difference between points in
the two subspaces. -/
lemma direction_sup {s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P} {p1 p2 : P} (hp1 : p1 ∈ s1) (hp2 : p2 ∈ s2) :
(s1 ⊔ s2).direction = s1.direction ⊔ s2.direction ⊔ k ∙ (p2 -ᵥ p1) :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ _,
{ change (affine_span k ((s1 : set P) ∪ s2)).direction ≤ _,
rw ←mem_coe at hp1,
rw [direction_affine_span, vector_span_eq_span_vsub_set_right k (set.mem_union_left _ hp1),
submodule.span_le],
rintros v ⟨p3, hp3, rfl⟩,
cases hp3,
{ rw [sup_assoc, sup_comm, set_like.mem_coe, submodule.mem_sup],
use [0, submodule.zero_mem _, p3 -ᵥ p1, vsub_mem_direction hp3 hp1],
rw zero_add },
{ rw [sup_assoc, set_like.mem_coe, submodule.mem_sup],
use [0, submodule.zero_mem _, p3 -ᵥ p1],
rw [and_comm, zero_add],
use rfl,
rw [←vsub_add_vsub_cancel p3 p2 p1, submodule.mem_sup],
use [p3 -ᵥ p2, vsub_mem_direction hp3 hp2, p2 -ᵥ p1,
submodule.mem_span_singleton_self _] } },
{ refine sup_le (sup_direction_le _ _) _,
rw [direction_eq_vector_span, vector_span_def],
exact Inf_le_Inf (λ p hp, set.subset.trans
(set.singleton_subset_iff.2
(vsub_mem_vsub (mem_span_points k p2 _ (set.mem_union_right _ hp2))
(mem_span_points k p1 _ (set.mem_union_left _ hp1))))
hp) }
end
/-- The direction of the span of the result of adding a point to a
nonempty affine subspace is the sup of the direction of that subspace
and of any one difference between that point and a point in the
subspace. -/
lemma direction_affine_span_insert {s : affine_subspace k P} {p1 p2 : P} (hp1 : p1 ∈ s) :
(affine_span k (insert p2 (s : set P))).direction = submodule.span k {p2 -ᵥ p1} ⊔ s.direction :=
begin
rw [sup_comm, ←set.union_singleton, ←coe_affine_span_singleton k V p2],
change (s ⊔ affine_span k {p2}).direction = _,
rw [direction_sup hp1 (mem_affine_span k (set.mem_singleton _)), direction_affine_span],
simp
end
/-- Given a point `p1` in an affine subspace `s`, and a point `p2`, a
point `p` is in the span of `s` with `p2` added if and only if it is a
multiple of `p2 -ᵥ p1` added to a point in `s`. -/
lemma mem_affine_span_insert_iff {s : affine_subspace k P} {p1 : P} (hp1 : p1 ∈ s) (p2 p : P) :
p ∈ affine_span k (insert p2 (s : set P)) ↔
∃ (r : k) (p0 : P) (hp0 : p0 ∈ s), p = r • (p2 -ᵥ p1 : V) +ᵥ p0 :=
begin
rw ←mem_coe at hp1,
rw [←vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem (mem_affine_span k (set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hp1)),
direction_affine_span_insert hp1, submodule.mem_sup],
split,
{ rintros ⟨v1, hv1, v2, hv2, hp⟩,
rw submodule.mem_span_singleton at hv1,
rcases hv1 with ⟨r, rfl⟩,
use [r, v2 +ᵥ p1, vadd_mem_of_mem_direction hv2 hp1],
symmetry' at hp,
rw [←sub_eq_zero, ←vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at hp,
rw [hp, vadd_vadd] },
{ rintros ⟨r, p3, hp3, rfl⟩,
use [r • (p2 -ᵥ p1), submodule.mem_span_singleton.2 ⟨r, rfl⟩, p3 -ᵥ p1,
vsub_mem_direction hp3 hp1],
rw [vadd_vsub_assoc, add_comm] }
end
end affine_subspace
|
0c1145096a2924538c1f03a029ed7747e9efc5b2 | 7cef822f3b952965621309e88eadf618da0c8ae9 | /src/topology/metric_space/cau_seq_filter.lean | 1ecaab4fd90129c1e11f078cbe663c0c07dbaca5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | rmitta/mathlib | 8d90aee30b4db2b013e01f62c33f297d7e64a43d | 883d974b608845bad30ae19e27e33c285200bf84 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,776,832,544 | 1,576,874,096,000 | 1,576,874,096,000 | 153,663,165 | 0 | 2 | Apache-2.0 | 1,544,806,490,000 | 1,539,884,365,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 19,717 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Sébastien Gouëzel
Characterize completeness of metric spaces in terms of Cauchy sequences.
In particular, reconcile the filter notion of Cauchy-ness with the cau_seq notion on normed spaces.
-/
import topology.uniform_space.basic analysis.normed_space.basic data.real.cau_seq analysis.specific_limits
import tactic.linarith
universes u v
open set filter classical emetric
open_locale topological_space
variable {β : Type v}
/- We show that a metric space in which all Cauchy sequences converge is complete, i.e., all
Cauchy filters converge. For this, we approximate any Cauchy filter by a Cauchy sequence,
taking advantage of the fact that there is a sequence tending to `0` in ℝ. The proof also gives
a more precise result, that to get completeness it is enough to have the convergence
of all sequence that are Cauchy in a fixed quantitative sense, for instance satisfying
`dist (u n) (u m) < 2^{- min m n}`. The classical argument to obtain this criterion is to start
from a Cauchy sequence, extract a subsequence that satisfies this property, deduce the convergence
of the subsequence, and then the convergence of the original sequence. All this argument is
completely bypassed by the following proof, which avoids any use of subsequences and is written
partly in terms of filters. -/
namespace ennreal
/-In this paragraph, we prove useful properties of the sequence `half_pow n := 2^{-n}` in ennreal.
Some of them are instrumental in this file to get Cauchy sequences, but others are proved
here only for use in further applications of the completeness criterion
`emetric.complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences` below. -/
/-- An auxiliary positive sequence that tends to `0` in `ennreal`, with good behavior. -/
noncomputable def half_pow (n : ℕ) : ennreal := ennreal.of_real ((1 / 2) ^ n)
lemma half_pow_pos (n : ℕ) : 0 < half_pow n :=
begin
have : (0 : real) < (1/2)^n := pow_pos (by norm_num) _,
simpa [half_pow] using this
end
lemma half_pow_tendsto_zero : tendsto (λn, half_pow n) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
begin
unfold half_pow,
rw ← ennreal.of_real_zero,
apply ennreal.tendsto_of_real,
exact _root_.tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_lt_1 (by norm_num) (by norm_num)
end
lemma half_pow_add_succ (n : ℕ) : half_pow (n+1) + half_pow (n+1) = half_pow n :=
begin
have : (0 : real) ≤ (1/2)^(n+1) := (le_of_lt (pow_pos (by norm_num) _)),
simp only [half_pow, eq.symm (ennreal.of_real_add this this)],
apply congr_arg,
simp only [pow_add, one_div_eq_inv, pow_one],
ring,
end
lemma half_pow_mono (m k : ℕ) (h : m ≤ k) : half_pow k ≤ half_pow m :=
ennreal.of_real_le_of_real (pow_le_pow_of_le_one (by norm_num) (by norm_num) h)
lemma edist_le_two_mul_half_pow [emetric_space β] {k l N : ℕ} (hk : N ≤ k) (hl : N ≤ l)
{u : ℕ → β} (h : ∀n, edist (u n) (u (n+1)) ≤ half_pow n) :
edist (u k) (u l) ≤ 2 * half_pow N :=
begin
have ineq_rec : ∀m, ∀k≥m, half_pow k + edist (u m) (u (k+1)) ≤ 2 * half_pow m,
{ assume m,
refine nat.le_induction _ (λk km hk, _),
{ calc half_pow m + edist (u m) (u (m+1)) ≤ half_pow m + half_pow m : add_le_add_left' (h m)
... = 2 * half_pow m : by simp [(mul_two _).symm, mul_comm] },
{ calc half_pow (k + 1) + edist (u m) (u (k + 1 + 1))
≤ half_pow (k+1) + (edist (u m) (u (k+1)) + edist (u (k+1)) (u (k+2))) :
add_le_add_left' (edist_triangle _ _ _)
... ≤ half_pow (k+1) + (edist (u m) (u (k+1)) + half_pow (k+1)) :
add_le_add_left' (add_le_add_left' (h (k+1)))
... = (half_pow(k+1) + half_pow(k+1)) + edist (u m) (u (k+1)) : by simp [add_comm]
... = half_pow k + edist (u m) (u (k+1)) : by rw half_pow_add_succ
... ≤ 2 * half_pow m : hk }},
have Imk : ∀m, ∀k≥m, edist (u m) (u k) ≤ 2 * half_pow m,
{ assume m k hk,
by_cases h : m = k,
{ simp [h, le_of_lt (half_pow_pos k)] },
{ have I : m < k := lt_of_le_of_ne hk h,
have : 0 < k := lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.zero_le _) ‹m < k›,
let l := nat.pred k,
have : k = l+1 := (nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos ‹0 < k›).symm,
rw this,
have : m ≤ l := begin rw this at I, apply nat.le_of_lt_succ I end,
calc edist (u m) (u (l+1)) ≤ half_pow l + edist (u m) (u (l+1)) : le_add_left (le_refl _)
... ≤ 2 * half_pow m : ineq_rec m l ‹m ≤ l› }},
by_cases h : k ≤ l,
{ calc edist (u k) (u l) ≤ 2 * half_pow k : Imk k l h
... ≤ 2 * half_pow N :
canonically_ordered_semiring.mul_le_mul (le_refl _) (half_pow_mono N k hk) },
{ simp at h,
calc edist (u k) (u l) = edist (u l) (u k) : edist_comm _ _
... ≤ 2 * half_pow l : Imk l k (le_of_lt h)
... ≤ 2 * half_pow N :
canonically_ordered_semiring.mul_le_mul (le_refl _) (half_pow_mono N l hl) }
end
lemma cauchy_seq_of_edist_le_half_pow [emetric_space β]
{u : ℕ → β} (h : ∀n, edist (u n) (u (n+1)) ≤ half_pow n) : cauchy_seq u :=
begin
refine emetric.cauchy_seq_iff_le_tendsto_0.2 ⟨λn:ℕ, 2 * half_pow n, ⟨_, _⟩⟩,
{ exact λk l N hk hl, edist_le_two_mul_half_pow hk hl h },
{ have : tendsto (λn, 2 * half_pow n) at_top (𝓝 (2 * 0)) :=
ennreal.tendsto.mul_right half_pow_tendsto_zero (by simp),
simpa using this }
end
end ennreal
namespace sequentially_complete
section
/- We fix a cauchy filter `f`, and a bounding sequence `B` made of positive numbers. We will
prove that, if all sequences satisfying `dist (u n) (u m) < B (min n m)` converge, then
the cauchy filter `f` is converging. The idea is to construct from `f` a Cauchy sequence
that satisfies this property, therefore converges, and then to deduce the convergence of
`f` from this.
We give the argument in the more general setting of emetric spaces, and specialize it to
metric spaces at the end.
-/
variables [emetric_space β] {f : filter β} (hf : cauchy f) (B : ℕ → ennreal) (hB : ∀n, 0 < B n)
open ennreal
/--Auxiliary sequence, which is bounded by `B`, positive, and tends to `0`.-/
noncomputable def B2 (B : ℕ → ennreal) (n : ℕ) :=
(half_pow n) ⊓ (B n)
lemma B2_pos (hB : ∀n, 0 < B n) (n : ℕ) : 0 < B2 B n :=
by unfold B2; simp [half_pow_pos n, hB n]
lemma B2_lim : tendsto (λn, B2 B n) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
begin
have : ∀n, B2 B n ≤ half_pow n := λn, lattice.inf_le_left,
exact tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le tendsto_const_nhds half_pow_tendsto_zero
(by simp) (by simp [this])
end
/-- Define a decreasing sequence of sets in the filter `f`, of diameter bounded by `B2 n`. -/
def set_seq_of_cau_filter : ℕ → set β
| 0 := some ((emetric.cauchy_iff.1 hf).2 _ (B2_pos B hB 0))
| (n+1) := (set_seq_of_cau_filter n) ∩ some ((emetric.cauchy_iff.1 hf).2 _ (B2_pos B hB (n + 1)))
/-- These sets are in the filter. -/
lemma set_seq_of_cau_filter_mem_sets : ∀ n, set_seq_of_cau_filter hf B hB n ∈ f
| 0 := some (some_spec ((emetric.cauchy_iff.1 hf).2 _ (B2_pos B hB 0)))
| (n+1) := inter_mem_sets (set_seq_of_cau_filter_mem_sets n)
(some (some_spec ((emetric.cauchy_iff.1 hf).2 _ (B2_pos B hB (n + 1)))))
/-- These sets are nonempty. -/
lemma set_seq_of_cau_filter_inhabited (n : ℕ) : ∃ x, x ∈ set_seq_of_cau_filter hf B hB n :=
inhabited_of_mem_sets (emetric.cauchy_iff.1 hf).1 (set_seq_of_cau_filter_mem_sets hf B hB n)
/-- By construction, their diameter is controlled by `B2 n`. -/
lemma set_seq_of_cau_filter_spec : ∀ n, ∀ {x y},
x ∈ set_seq_of_cau_filter hf B hB n → y ∈ set_seq_of_cau_filter hf B hB n → edist x y < B2 B n
| 0 := some_spec (some_spec ((emetric.cauchy_iff.1 hf).2 _ (B2_pos B hB 0)))
| (n+1) := λ x y hx hy,
some_spec (some_spec ((emetric.cauchy_iff.1 hf).2 _ (B2_pos B hB (n+1)))) x y
(mem_of_mem_inter_right hx) (mem_of_mem_inter_right hy)
-- this must exist somewhere, no?
private lemma mono_of_mono_succ_aux {α} [partial_order α] (f : ℕ → α) (h : ∀ n, f (n+1) ≤ f n) (m : ℕ) :
∀ n, f (m + n) ≤ f m
| 0 := le_refl _
| (k+1) := le_trans (h _) (mono_of_mono_succ_aux _)
lemma mono_of_mono_succ {α} [partial_order α] (f : ℕ → α) (h : ∀ n, f (n+1) ≤ f n) {m n : ℕ}
(hmn : m ≤ n) : f n ≤ f m :=
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := nat.exists_eq_add_of_le hmn in
by simpa [hk] using mono_of_mono_succ_aux f h m k
lemma set_seq_of_cau_filter_monotone' (n : ℕ) :
set_seq_of_cau_filter hf B hB (n+1) ⊆ set_seq_of_cau_filter hf B hB n :=
inter_subset_left _ _
/-- These sets are nested. -/
lemma set_seq_of_cau_filter_monotone {n k : ℕ} (hle : n ≤ k) :
set_seq_of_cau_filter hf B hB k ⊆ set_seq_of_cau_filter hf B hB n :=
mono_of_mono_succ (set_seq_of_cau_filter hf B hB) (set_seq_of_cau_filter_monotone' hf B hB) hle
/-- Define the approximating Cauchy sequence for the Cauchy filter `f`,
obtained by taking a point in each set. -/
noncomputable def seq_of_cau_filter (n : ℕ) : β :=
some (set_seq_of_cau_filter_inhabited hf B hB n)
/-- The approximating sequence indeed belong to our good sets. -/
lemma seq_of_cau_filter_mem_set_seq (n : ℕ) : seq_of_cau_filter hf B hB n ∈ set_seq_of_cau_filter hf B hB n :=
some_spec (set_seq_of_cau_filter_inhabited hf B hB n)
/-- The distance between points in the sequence is bounded by `B2 N`. -/
lemma seq_of_cau_filter_bound {N n k : ℕ} (hn : N ≤ n) (hk : N ≤ k) :
edist (seq_of_cau_filter hf B hB n) (seq_of_cau_filter hf B hB k) < B2 B N :=
set_seq_of_cau_filter_spec hf B hB N
(set_seq_of_cau_filter_monotone hf B hB hn (seq_of_cau_filter_mem_set_seq hf B hB n))
(set_seq_of_cau_filter_monotone hf B hB hk (seq_of_cau_filter_mem_set_seq hf B hB k))
/-- The approximating sequence is indeed Cauchy as `B2 n` tends to `0` with `n`. -/
lemma seq_of_cau_filter_is_cauchy :
cauchy_seq (seq_of_cau_filter hf B hB) :=
emetric.cauchy_seq_iff_le_tendsto_0.2 ⟨B2 B,
λ n m N hn hm, le_of_lt (seq_of_cau_filter_bound hf B hB hn hm), B2_lim B⟩
/-- If the approximating Cauchy sequence is converging, to a limit `y`, then the
original Cauchy filter `f` is also converging, to the same limit.
Given `t1` in the filter `f` and `t2` a neighborhood of `y`, it suffices to show that `t1 ∩ t2` is
nonempty.
Pick `ε` so that the ε-eball around `y` is contained in `t2`.
Pick `n` with `B2 n < ε/2`, and `n2` such that `dist(seq n2, y) < ε/2`. Let `N = max(n, n2)`.
We defined `seq` by looking at a decreasing sequence of sets of `f` with shrinking radius.
The Nth one has radius `< B2 N < ε/2`. This set is in `f`, so we can find an element `x` that's
also in `t1`.
`dist(x, seq N) < ε/2` since `seq N` is in this set, and `dist (seq N, y) < ε/2`,
so `x` is in the ε-ball around `y`, and thus in `t2`. -/
lemma le_nhds_cau_filter_lim {y : β} (H : tendsto (seq_of_cau_filter hf B hB) at_top (𝓝 y)) :
f ≤ 𝓝 y :=
begin
refine (le_nhds_iff_adhp_of_cauchy hf).2 _,
refine forall_sets_neq_empty_iff_neq_bot.1 (λs hs, _),
rcases filter.mem_inf_sets.2 hs with ⟨t1, ht1, t2, ht2, ht1t2⟩,
rcases emetric.mem_nhds_iff.1 ht2 with ⟨ε, hε, ht2'⟩,
cases emetric.cauchy_iff.1 hf with hfb _,
have : ε / 2 > 0 := ennreal.half_pos hε,
rcases inhabited_of_mem_sets (by simp) ((tendsto_orderable.1 (B2_lim B)).2 _ this)
with ⟨n, hnε⟩,
simp only [set.mem_set_of_eq] at hnε, -- hnε : ε / 2 > B2 B hB n
cases (emetric.tendsto_at_top _).1 H _ this with n2 hn2,
let N := max n n2,
have ht1sn : t1 ∩ set_seq_of_cau_filter hf B hB N ∈ f,
from inter_mem_sets ht1 (set_seq_of_cau_filter_mem_sets hf B hB _),
have hts1n_ne : t1 ∩ set_seq_of_cau_filter hf B hB N ≠ ∅,
from forall_sets_neq_empty_iff_neq_bot.2 hfb _ ht1sn,
cases exists_mem_of_ne_empty hts1n_ne with x hx,
-- x : β, hx : x ∈ t1 ∩ set_seq_of_cau_filter hf B hB N
-- we still have to show that x ∈ t2, i.e., edist x y < ε
have I1 : seq_of_cau_filter hf B hB N ∈ set_seq_of_cau_filter hf B hB n :=
(set_seq_of_cau_filter_monotone hf B hB (le_max_left n n2)) (seq_of_cau_filter_mem_set_seq hf B hB N),
have I2 : x ∈ set_seq_of_cau_filter hf B hB n :=
(set_seq_of_cau_filter_monotone hf B hB (le_max_left n n2)) hx.2,
have hdist1 : edist x (seq_of_cau_filter hf B hB N) < B2 B n :=
set_seq_of_cau_filter_spec hf B hB _ I2 I1,
have hdist2 : edist (seq_of_cau_filter hf B hB N) y < ε / 2 :=
hn2 N (le_max_right _ _),
have hdist : edist x y < ε := calc
edist x y ≤ edist x (seq_of_cau_filter hf B hB N) + edist (seq_of_cau_filter hf B hB N) y : edist_triangle _ _ _
... < B2 B n + ε/2 : ennreal.add_lt_add hdist1 hdist2
... ≤ ε/2 + ε/2 : add_le_add_right' (le_of_lt hnε)
... = ε : ennreal.add_halves _,
have hxt2 : x ∈ t2, from ht2' hdist,
exact ne_empty_iff_exists_mem.2 ⟨x, ht1t2 (mem_inter hx.left hxt2)⟩
end
end
end sequentially_complete
/-- An emetric space in which every Cauchy sequence converges is complete. -/
theorem complete_of_cauchy_seq_tendsto {α : Type u} [emetric_space α]
(H : ∀u : ℕ → α, cauchy_seq u → ∃x, tendsto u at_top (𝓝 x)) :
complete_space α :=
⟨begin
-- Consider a Cauchy filter `f`
intros f hf,
-- Introduce a sequence `u` approximating the filter `f`. We don't need the bound `B`,
-- so take for instance `B n = 1` for all `n`.
let u := sequentially_complete.seq_of_cau_filter hf (λn, 1) (λn, ennreal.zero_lt_one),
-- It is Cauchy.
have : cauchy_seq u := sequentially_complete.seq_of_cau_filter_is_cauchy hf (λn, 1) (λn, ennreal.zero_lt_one),
-- Therefore, it converges by assumption. Let `x` be its limit.
rcases H u this with ⟨x, hx⟩,
-- The original filter also converges to `x`.
exact ⟨x, sequentially_complete.le_nhds_cau_filter_lim hf (λn, 1) (λn, ennreal.zero_lt_one) hx⟩
end⟩
/-- A very useful criterion to show that a space is complete is to show that all sequences
which satisfy a bound of the form `edist (u n) (u m) < B N` for all `n m ≥ N` are
converging. This is often applied for `B N = 2^{-N}`, i.e., with a very fast convergence to
`0`, which makes it possible to use arguments of converging series, while this is impossible
to do in general for arbitrary Cauchy sequences. -/
theorem emetric.complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences {α : Type u} [emetric_space α]
(B : ℕ → ennreal) (hB : ∀n, 0 < B n)
(H : ∀u : ℕ → α, (∀N n m : ℕ, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → edist (u n) (u m) < B N) → ∃x, tendsto u at_top (𝓝 x)) :
complete_space α :=
⟨begin
-- Consider a Cauchy filter `f`.
intros f hf,
-- Introduce a sequence `u` approximating the filter `f`.
let u := sequentially_complete.seq_of_cau_filter hf B hB,
-- It satisfies the required bound.
have : ∀N n m : ℕ, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → edist (u n) (u m) < B N := λN n m hn hm, calc
edist (u n) (u m) < sequentially_complete.B2 B N :
sequentially_complete.seq_of_cau_filter_bound hf B hB hn hm
... ≤ B N : lattice.inf_le_right,
-- Therefore, it converges by assumption. Let `x` be its limit.
rcases H u this with ⟨x, hx⟩,
-- The original filter also converges to `x`.
exact ⟨x, sequentially_complete.le_nhds_cau_filter_lim hf B hB hx⟩
end⟩
/-- A very useful criterion to show that a space is complete is to show that all sequences
which satisfy a bound of the form `dist (u n) (u m) < B N` for all `n m ≥ N` are
converging. This is often applied for `B N = 2^{-N}`, i.e., with a very fast convergence to
`0`, which makes it possible to use arguments of converging series, while this is impossible
to do in general for arbitrary Cauchy sequences. -/
theorem metric.complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences {α : Type u} [metric_space α]
(B : ℕ → real) (hB : ∀n, 0 < B n)
(H : ∀u : ℕ → α, (∀N n m : ℕ, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → dist (u n) (u m) < B N) → ∃x, tendsto u at_top (𝓝 x)) :
complete_space α :=
begin
-- this follows from the same criterion in emetric spaces. We just need to translate
-- the convergence assumption from `dist` to `edist`
apply emetric.complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences (λn, ennreal.of_real (B n)),
{ simp [hB] },
{ assume u Hu,
apply H,
assume N n m hn hm,
have Z := Hu N n m hn hm,
rw [edist_dist, ennreal.of_real_lt_of_real_iff] at Z,
exact Z,
exact hB N }
end
section
/- Now, we will apply these results to `cau_seq`, i.e., "Cauchy sequences" defined by a
multiplicative absolute value on normed fields. -/
lemma tendsto_limit [normed_ring β] [hn : is_absolute_value (norm : β → ℝ)]
(f : cau_seq β norm) [cau_seq.is_complete β norm] :
tendsto f at_top (𝓝 f.lim) :=
_root_.tendsto_nhds.mpr
begin
intros s os lfs,
suffices : ∃ (a : ℕ), ∀ (b : ℕ), b ≥ a → f b ∈ s, by simpa using this,
rcases metric.is_open_iff.1 os _ lfs with ⟨ε, ⟨hε, hεs⟩⟩,
cases setoid.symm (cau_seq.equiv_lim f) _ hε with N hN,
existsi N,
intros b hb,
apply hεs,
dsimp [metric.ball], rw [dist_comm, dist_eq_norm],
solve_by_elim
end
variables [normed_field β]
/-
This section shows that if we have a uniform space generated by an absolute value, topological
completeness and Cauchy sequence completeness coincide. The problem is that there isn't
a good notion of "uniform space generated by an absolute value", so right now this is
specific to norm. Furthermore, norm only instantiates is_absolute_value on normed_field.
This needs to be fixed, since it prevents showing that ℤ_[hp] is complete
-/
instance normed_field.is_absolute_value : is_absolute_value (norm : β → ℝ) :=
{ abv_nonneg := norm_nonneg,
abv_eq_zero := norm_eq_zero,
abv_add := norm_add_le,
abv_mul := normed_field.norm_mul }
open metric
lemma cauchy_of_filter_cauchy (f : ℕ → β) (hf : cauchy_seq f) :
is_cau_seq norm f :=
begin
cases cauchy_iff.1 hf with hf1 hf2,
intros ε hε,
rcases hf2 {x | dist x.1 x.2 < ε} (dist_mem_uniformity hε) with ⟨t, ⟨ht, htsub⟩⟩,
simp at ht, cases ht with N hN,
existsi N,
intros j hj,
rw ←dist_eq_norm,
apply @htsub (f j, f N),
apply set.mk_mem_prod; solve_by_elim [le_refl]
end
lemma filter_cauchy_of_cauchy (f : cau_seq β norm) : cauchy_seq f :=
begin
apply cauchy_iff.2,
split,
{ exact map_ne_bot at_top_ne_bot },
{ intros s hs,
rcases mem_uniformity_dist.1 hs with ⟨ε, ⟨hε, hεs⟩⟩,
cases cau_seq.cauchy₂ f hε with N hN,
existsi {n | n ≥ N}.image f,
simp, split,
{ existsi N, intros b hb, existsi b, simp [hb] },
{ rintros ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨⟨a', ⟨ha'1, ha'2⟩⟩, ⟨b', ⟨hb'1, hb'2⟩⟩⟩,
dsimp at ha'1 ha'2 hb'1 hb'2,
rw [←ha'2, ←hb'2],
apply hεs,
rw dist_eq_norm,
apply hN; assumption }},
end
/-- In a normed field, `cau_seq` coincides with the usual notion of Cauchy sequences. -/
lemma cau_seq_iff_cauchy_seq {α : Type u} [normed_field α] {u : ℕ → α} :
is_cau_seq norm u ↔ cauchy_seq u :=
⟨λh, filter_cauchy_of_cauchy ⟨u, h⟩,
λh, cauchy_of_filter_cauchy u h⟩
/-- A complete normed field is complete as a metric space, as Cauchy sequences converge by
assumption and this suffices to characterize completeness. -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance complete_space_of_cau_seq_complete [cau_seq.is_complete β norm] : complete_space β :=
begin
apply complete_of_cauchy_seq_tendsto,
assume u hu,
have C : is_cau_seq norm u := cau_seq_iff_cauchy_seq.2 hu,
existsi cau_seq.lim ⟨u, C⟩,
rw metric.tendsto_at_top,
assume ε εpos,
cases (cau_seq.equiv_lim ⟨u, C⟩) _ εpos with N hN,
existsi N,
simpa [dist_eq_norm] using hN
end
end
|
47b10a3735a32e1087b4992824c03f8a304be05a | b7f22e51856f4989b970961f794f1c435f9b8f78 | /library/data/set/comm_semiring.lean | 7d4e5fc3117fa08ae27f63c7955023f2e28f1450 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean | cb8aa01055ffe2af0fb99a16b4cda8463b882cd1 | 38607e3eb57f57f77c0ac114ad169e9e4262e24f | refs/heads/master | 1,611,187,284,081 | 1,450,766,737,000 | 1,476,122,547,000 | 11,513,992 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,401,763,102,000 | 1,374,182,235,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 856 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Leonardo de Moura
(set A) is an instance of a commutative semiring
-/
import data.set.basic algebra.ring
open set
definition set_comm_semiring [instance] (A : Type) : comm_semiring (set A) :=
⦃ comm_semiring,
add := union,
mul := inter,
zero := empty,
one := univ,
add_assoc := union_assoc,
add_comm := union_comm,
zero_add := empty_union,
add_zero := union_empty,
mul_assoc := inter_assoc,
mul_comm := inter_comm,
zero_mul := empty_inter,
mul_zero := inter_empty,
one_mul := univ_inter,
mul_one := inter_univ,
left_distrib := inter_distrib_left,
right_distrib := inter_distrib_right
⦄
|
d64d3b4fc6b22377c9cdcb7ba1c91979cdd08076 | 12dabd587ce2621d9a4eff9f16e354d02e206c8e | /world10/level16.lean | 9fe86658c4e638f937cfdb075b3ad83620e3d820 | [] | no_license | abdelq/natural-number-game | a1b5b8f1d52625a7addcefc97c966d3f06a48263 | bbddadc6d2e78ece2e9acd40fa7702ecc2db75c2 | refs/heads/master | 1,668,606,478,691 | 1,594,175,058,000 | 1,594,175,058,000 | 278,673,209 | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 232 | lean | lemma lt_aux_two (a b : mynat) : succ a ≤ b → a ≤ b ∧ ¬ (b ≤ a) :=
begin
intro h,
split,
apply le_trans _ (succ a),
exact le_succ_self a,
exact h,
intro h2,
apply not_succ_le_self a,
exact le_trans (succ a) b a h h2,
end
|
10f6d7415859868a4a31497df14da2c84b3bd9b4 | 55c7fc2bf55d496ace18cd6f3376e12bb14c8cc5 | /src/category_theory/limits/shapes/constructions/preserve_binary_products.lean | 84912f69bac7eab36a33ff91181ed7f2bba0077c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dupuisf/mathlib | 62de4ec6544bf3b79086afd27b6529acfaf2c1bb | 8582b06b0a5d06c33ee07d0bdf7c646cae22cf36 | refs/heads/master | 1,669,494,854,016 | 1,595,692,409,000 | 1,595,692,409,000 | 272,046,630 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,592,066,143,000 | 1,592,066,142,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,445 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta
-/
import category_theory.limits.limits
import category_theory.limits.preserves
import category_theory.limits.shapes.binary_products
/-!
Show that a functor `F : C ⥤ D` preserves binary products if and only if
`⟨Fπ₁, Fπ₂⟩ : F (A ⨯ B) ⟶ F A ⨯ F B` (that is, `prod_comparison`) is an isomorphism for all `A, B`.
-/
open category_theory
namespace category_theory.limits
universes v u₁ u₂ u₃ -- declare the `v`'s first; see `category_theory.category` for an explanation
variables {C : Type u₁} [category.{v} C]
variables {D : Type u₂} [category.{v} D]
variables [has_binary_products D] (F : C ⥤ D)
/-- (Implementation). Construct a cone for `pair A B ⋙ F` which we will show is limiting. -/
@[simps]
def alternative_cone (A B : C) : cone (pair A B ⋙ F) :=
{ X := F.obj A ⨯ F.obj B,
π := discrete.nat_trans (λ j, walking_pair.cases_on j limits.prod.fst limits.prod.snd)}
/-- (Implementation). Show that we have a limit for the shape `pair A B ⋙ F`. -/
def alternative_cone_is_limit (A B : C) : is_limit (alternative_cone F A B) :=
{ lift := λ s, prod.lift (s.π.app walking_pair.left) (s.π.app walking_pair.right),
fac' := λ s j, walking_pair.cases_on j (prod.lift_fst _ _) (prod.lift_snd _ _),
uniq' := λ s m w, prod.hom_ext
(by { rw prod.lift_fst, apply w walking_pair.left })
(by { rw prod.lift_snd, apply w walking_pair.right }) }
variable [has_binary_products C]
/-- If `prod_comparison F A B` is an iso, then `F` preserves the limit `A ⨯ B`. -/
def preserves_binary_prod_of_prod_comparison_iso (A B : C) [is_iso (prod_comparison F A B)] :
preserves_limit (pair A B) F :=
preserves_limit_of_preserves_limit_cone (limit.is_limit (pair A B))
begin
apply is_limit.of_iso_limit (alternative_cone_is_limit F A B) _,
apply cones.ext _ _,
{ apply (as_iso (prod_comparison F A B)).symm },
{ rintro ⟨j⟩,
{ apply (as_iso (prod_comparison F A B)).eq_inv_comp.2 (prod.lift_fst _ _) },
{ apply (as_iso (prod_comparison F A B)).eq_inv_comp.2 (prod.lift_snd _ _) } },
end
/-- If `prod_comparison F A B` is an iso for all `A, B` , then `F` preserves binary products. -/
instance preserves_binary_prods_of_prod_comparison_iso [∀ A B, is_iso (prod_comparison F A B)] :
preserves_limits_of_shape (discrete walking_pair) F :=
{ preserves_limit := λ K,
begin
haveI := preserves_binary_prod_of_prod_comparison_iso F (K.obj walking_pair.left) (K.obj walking_pair.right),
apply preserves_limit_of_iso F (diagram_iso_pair K).symm,
end }
variables [preserves_limits_of_shape (discrete walking_pair) F]
/--
The product comparison isomorphism. Technically a special case of `preserves_limit_iso`, but
this version is convenient to have.
-/
instance prod_comparison_iso_of_preserves_binary_prods (A B : C) : is_iso (prod_comparison F A B) :=
let t : is_limit (F.map_cone _) := preserves_limit.preserves (limit.is_limit (pair A B)) in
{ inv := t.lift (alternative_cone F A B),
hom_inv_id' :=
begin
apply is_limit.hom_ext t,
rintro ⟨j⟩,
{ rw [category.assoc, t.fac, category.id_comp], apply prod.lift_fst },
{ rw [category.assoc, t.fac, category.id_comp], apply prod.lift_snd },
end,
inv_hom_id' := by ext ⟨j⟩; { simpa [prod_comparison] using t.fac _ _ } }
end category_theory.limits
|
f711bb748711d5c61ce4399afbd46ece6a960a53 | 86f6f4f8d827a196a32bfc646234b73328aeb306 | /examples/sets_functions_and_relations/unnamed_310.lean | da35669870a0b65ed021225bcffb9882c8faa3a9 | [] | no_license | jamescheuk91/mathematics_in_lean | 09f1f87d2b0dce53464ff0cbe592c568ff59cf5e | 4452499264e2975bca2f42565c0925506ba5dda3 | refs/heads/master | 1,679,716,410,967 | 1,613,957,947,000 | 1,613,957,947,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 202 | lean | import data.set.basic
variable {α : Type*}
variables (s t u : set α)
-- BEGIN
example : s ∩ t = t ∩ s :=
set.ext $ λ x, ⟨λ ⟨xs, xt⟩, ⟨xt, xs⟩, λ ⟨xt, xs⟩, ⟨xs, xt⟩⟩
-- END |
e2dbee065db4353ab0ddc58519c9e4ffd064a2bd | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/topology/metric_space/gromov_hausdorff.lean | 4b71c30b5d6f000b8b91d9ce154c11253ddbf9c4 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,214 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.topology.metric_space.closeds
import Mathlib.set_theory.cardinal
import Mathlib.topology.metric_space.gromov_hausdorff_realized
import Mathlib.topology.metric_space.completion
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes u v w l
namespace Mathlib
/-!
# Gromov-Hausdorff distance
This file defines the Gromov-Hausdorff distance on the space of nonempty compact metric spaces
up to isometry.
We introduce the space of all nonempty compact metric spaces, up to isometry,
called `GH_space`, and endow it with a metric space structure. The distance,
known as the Gromov-Hausdorff distance, is defined as follows: given two
nonempty compact spaces `X` and `Y`, their distance is the minimum Hausdorff distance
between all possible isometric embeddings of `X` and `Y` in all metric spaces.
To define properly the Gromov-Hausdorff space, we consider the non-empty
compact subsets of `ℓ^∞(ℝ)` up to isometry, which is a well-defined type,
and define the distance as the infimum of the Hausdorff distance over all
embeddings in `ℓ^∞(ℝ)`. We prove that this coincides with the previous description,
as all separable metric spaces embed isometrically into `ℓ^∞(ℝ)`, through an
embedding called the Kuratowski embedding.
To prove that we have a distance, we should show that if spaces can be coupled
to be arbitrarily close, then they are isometric. More generally, the Gromov-Hausdorff
distance is realized, i.e., there is a coupling for which the Hausdorff distance
is exactly the Gromov-Hausdorff distance. This follows from a compactness
argument, essentially following from Arzela-Ascoli.
## Main results
We prove the most important properties of the Gromov-Hausdorff space: it is a polish space,
i.e., it is complete and second countable. We also prove the Gromov compactness criterion.
-/
namespace Gromov_Hausdorff
/- In this section, we define the Gromov-Hausdorff space, denoted `GH_space` as the quotient
of nonempty compact subsets of `ℓ^∞(ℝ)` by identifying isometric sets.
Using the Kuratwoski embedding, we get a canonical map `to_GH_space` mapping any nonempty
compact type to `GH_space`. -/
/-- Equivalence relation identifying two nonempty compact sets which are isometric -/
/-- This is indeed an equivalence relation -/
/-- setoid instance identifying two isometric nonempty compact subspaces of ℓ^∞(ℝ) -/
protected instance isometry_rel.setoid : setoid (topological_space.nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ) :=
setoid.mk isometry_rel is_equivalence_isometry_rel
/-- The Gromov-Hausdorff space -/
def GH_space :=
quotient isometry_rel.setoid
/-- Map any nonempty compact type to `GH_space` -/
def to_GH_space (α : Type u) [metric_space α] [compact_space α] [Nonempty α] : GH_space :=
quotient.mk (nonempty_compacts.Kuratowski_embedding α)
protected instance GH_space.inhabited : Inhabited GH_space :=
{ default := Quot.mk setoid.r { val := singleton 0, property := sorry } }
/-- A metric space representative of any abstract point in `GH_space` -/
def GH_space.rep (p : GH_space) :=
↥(subtype.val (quot.out p))
theorem eq_to_GH_space_iff {α : Type u} [metric_space α] [compact_space α] [Nonempty α] {p : topological_space.nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ} : quotient.mk p = to_GH_space α ↔ ∃ (Ψ : α → ℓ_infty_ℝ), isometry Ψ ∧ set.range Ψ = subtype.val p := sorry
theorem eq_to_GH_space {p : topological_space.nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ} : quotient.mk p = to_GH_space ↥(subtype.val p) :=
iff.mpr eq_to_GH_space_iff
(Exists.intro (fun (x : ↥(subtype.val p)) => ↑x) { left := isometry_subtype_coe, right := subtype.range_coe })
protected instance rep_GH_space_metric_space {p : GH_space} : metric_space (GH_space.rep p) :=
subtype.metric_space
protected instance rep_GH_space_compact_space {p : GH_space} : compact_space (GH_space.rep p) :=
topological_space.nonempty_compacts.to_compact_space
protected instance rep_GH_space_nonempty {p : GH_space} : Nonempty (GH_space.rep p) :=
topological_space.nonempty_compacts.to_nonempty
theorem GH_space.to_GH_space_rep (p : GH_space) : to_GH_space (GH_space.rep p) = p :=
id
(eq.mpr (id (Eq._oldrec (Eq.refl (to_GH_space ↥(subtype.val (quot.out p)) = p)) (Eq.symm eq_to_GH_space)))
(quot.out_eq p))
/-- Two nonempty compact spaces have the same image in `GH_space` if and only if they are
isometric. -/
theorem to_GH_space_eq_to_GH_space_iff_isometric {α : Type u} [metric_space α] [compact_space α] [Nonempty α] {β : Type u} [metric_space β] [compact_space β] [Nonempty β] : to_GH_space α = to_GH_space β ↔ Nonempty (α ≃ᵢ β) := sorry
/-- Distance on `GH_space`: the distance between two nonempty compact spaces is the infimum
Hausdorff distance between isometric copies of the two spaces in a metric space. For the definition,
we only consider embeddings in `ℓ^∞(ℝ)`, but we will prove below that it works for all spaces. -/
protected instance GH_space.has_dist : has_dist GH_space :=
has_dist.mk
fun (x y : GH_space) =>
Inf
((fun (p : topological_space.nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ × topological_space.nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ) =>
metric.Hausdorff_dist (subtype.val (prod.fst p)) (subtype.val (prod.snd p))) ''
set.prod (set_of fun (a : topological_space.nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ) => quotient.mk a = x)
(set_of fun (b : topological_space.nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ) => quotient.mk b = y))
/-- The Gromov-Hausdorff distance between two nonempty compact metric spaces, equal by definition to
the distance of the equivalence classes of these spaces in the Gromov-Hausdorff space. -/
def GH_dist (α : Type u) (β : Type v) [metric_space α] [Nonempty α] [compact_space α] [metric_space β] [Nonempty β] [compact_space β] : ℝ :=
dist (to_GH_space α) (to_GH_space β)
theorem dist_GH_dist (p : GH_space) (q : GH_space) : dist p q = GH_dist (GH_space.rep p) (GH_space.rep q) := sorry
/-- The Gromov-Hausdorff distance between two spaces is bounded by the Hausdorff distance
of isometric copies of the spaces, in any metric space. -/
theorem GH_dist_le_Hausdorff_dist {α : Type u} [metric_space α] [compact_space α] [Nonempty α] {β : Type v} [metric_space β] [compact_space β] [Nonempty β] {γ : Type w} [metric_space γ] {Φ : α → γ} {Ψ : β → γ} (ha : isometry Φ) (hb : isometry Ψ) : GH_dist α β ≤ metric.Hausdorff_dist (set.range Φ) (set.range Ψ) := sorry
/-- The optimal coupling constructed above realizes exactly the Gromov-Hausdorff distance,
essentially by design. -/
theorem Hausdorff_dist_optimal {α : Type u} [metric_space α] [compact_space α] [Nonempty α] {β : Type v} [metric_space β] [compact_space β] [Nonempty β] : metric.Hausdorff_dist (set.range (optimal_GH_injl α β)) (set.range (optimal_GH_injr α β)) = GH_dist α β := sorry
/-- The Gromov-Hausdorff distance can also be realized by a coupling in `ℓ^∞(ℝ)`, by embedding
the optimal coupling through its Kuratowski embedding. -/
theorem GH_dist_eq_Hausdorff_dist (α : Type u) [metric_space α] [compact_space α] [Nonempty α] (β : Type v) [metric_space β] [compact_space β] [Nonempty β] : ∃ (Φ : α → ℓ_infty_ℝ),
∃ (Ψ : β → ℓ_infty_ℝ), isometry Φ ∧ isometry Ψ ∧ GH_dist α β = metric.Hausdorff_dist (set.range Φ) (set.range Ψ) := sorry
-- without the next two lines, `{ exact hΦ.is_closed }` in the next
-- proof is very slow, as the `t2_space` instance is very hard to find
/-- The Gromov-Hausdorff distance defines a genuine distance on the Gromov-Hausdorff space. -/
protected instance GH_space_metric_space : metric_space GH_space := sorry
end Gromov_Hausdorff
/-- In particular, nonempty compacts of a metric space map to `GH_space`. We register this
in the topological_space namespace to take advantage of the notation `p.to_GH_space`. -/
def topological_space.nonempty_compacts.to_GH_space {α : Type u} [metric_space α] (p : topological_spa |
411ac44edf1a3db933cbb715f59fc325acceef49 | b7f22e51856f4989b970961f794f1c435f9b8f78 | /tests/lean/run/ind4.lean | 6933539063f43a3a3fc5e1d3e656f8602e76dea8 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean | cb8aa01055ffe2af0fb99a16b4cda8463b882cd1 | 38607e3eb57f57f77c0ac114ad169e9e4262e24f | refs/heads/master | 1,611,187,284,081 | 1,450,766,737,000 | 1,476,122,547,000 | 11,513,992 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,401,763,102,000 | 1,374,182,235,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 378 | lean | section
variable A : Type
inductive list : Type :=
| nil : list
| cons : A → list → list
end
check list.{1}
check list.cons.{1}
section
variable A : Type
inductive tree : Type :=
| node : A → forest → tree
with forest : Type :=
| fnil : forest
| fcons : tree → forest → forest
check tree
check forest
end
check tree.{1}
check forest.{1}
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.