id
stringlengths
11
15
title
stringlengths
7
171
problem
stringlengths
9
4.33k
solution
stringlengths
6
19k
problem_wikitext
stringlengths
9
4.42k
solution_wikitext
stringlengths
7
19.1k
proof_title
stringlengths
9
171
theorem_url
stringlengths
34
198
proof_url
stringlengths
36
198
categories
listlengths
0
9
theorem_references
listlengths
0
36
proof_references
listlengths
0
253
proofwiki-10600
Sine in terms of Secant
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sin x | r = + \frac {\sqrt{\sec ^2 x - 1} } {\sec x} | c = if there exists an integer $n$ such that $n \pi < x < \paren {n + \dfrac 1 2} \pi$ }} {{eqn | l = \sin x | r = - \frac {\sqrt{\sec ^2 x - 1} } {\sec x} | c = if there exists an integer $n$ such that $\paren {n ...
For the first part, if there exists integer $n$ such that $n \pi < x < \paren {n + \dfrac 1 2} \pi$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \tan x | r = +\sqrt {\sec^2 x - 1} | c = Tangent in terms of Secant }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \frac {\sin x} {\cos x} | r = +\sqrt {\sec^2 x - 1} | c = Tangent...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sin x | r = + \frac {\sqrt{\sec ^2 x - 1} } {\sec x} | c = if there exists an [[Definition:Integer|integer]] $n$ such that $n \pi < x < \paren {n + \dfrac 1 2} \pi$ }} {{eqn | l = \sin x | r = - \frac {\sqrt{\sec ^2 x - 1} } {\sec x} | c = if there exists an [[Definiti...
For the first part, if there exists [[Definition:Integer|integer]] $n$ such that $n \pi < x < \paren {n + \dfrac 1 2} \pi$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \tan x | r = +\sqrt {\sec^2 x - 1} | c = [[Tangent in terms of Secant]] }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \frac {\sin x} {\cos x} | r = +\sqrt {\sec^...
Sine in terms of Secant
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sine_in_terms_of_Secant
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sine_in_terms_of_Secant
[ "Sine Function", "Secant Function" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Integer" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Tangent in terms of Secant", "Tangent is Sine divided by Cosine", "Secant is Reciprocal of Cosine", "Definition:Integer", "Tangent in terms of Secant", "Tangent is Sine divided by Cosine", "Secant is Reciprocal of Cosine" ]
proofwiki-10601
Sign of Sine
Let $x$ be a real number. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sin x | o = > | r = 0 | c = if there exists an integer $n$ such that $2 n \pi < x < \paren {2 n + 1} \pi$ }} {{eqn | l = \sin x | o = < | r = 0 | c = if there exists an integer $n$ such that $\paren {2 n + 1} \pi < x < \paren {2 n ...
First the case where $n \ge 0$ is addressed. The proof proceeds by induction. For all $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the proposition: :$\forall x \in \R:$ ::$2 n \pi < x < \paren {2 n + 1} \pi \implies \sin x > 0$ ::$\paren {2 n + 1} \pi < x < \paren {2 n + 2} \pi \implies \sin x < 0$
Let $x$ be a [[Definition:Real Number|real number]]. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sin x | o = > | r = 0 | c = if there exists an [[Definition:Integer|integer]] $n$ such that $2 n \pi < x < \paren {2 n + 1} \pi$ }} {{eqn | l = \sin x | o = < | r = 0 | c = if there exists an [[Definitio...
First the case where $n \ge 0$ is addressed. The proof proceeds by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]]. For all $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :$\forall x \in \R:$ ::$2 n \pi < x < \paren {2 n + 1} \pi \implies \sin x > 0$ ::$\paren {2 n + 1} \pi < x...
Sign of Sine
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sign_of_Sine
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sign_of_Sine
[ "Sine Function" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Sine/Real Function" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Proposition", "Principle of Mathematical Induction" ]
proofwiki-10602
Second Principle of Mathematical Induction
Let $\map P n$ be a propositional function depending on $n \in \Z$. Let $n_0 \in \Z$ be given. Suppose that: :$(1): \quad \map P {n_0}$ is true :$(2): \quad \forall k \in \Z: k \ge n_0: \map P {n_0} \land \map P {n_0 + 1} \land \ldots \land \map P {k - 1} \land \map P k \implies \map P {k + 1}$ Then: :$\map P n$ is tru...
For each $n \ge n_0$, let $\map {P'} n$ be defined as: :$\map {P'} n := \map P {n_0} \land \dots \land \map P n$ It suffices to show that $\map {P'} n$ is true for all $n \ge n_0$. It is immediate from the assumption $\map P {n_0}$ that $\map {P'} {n_0}$ is true. Now suppose that $\map {P'} n$ holds. By $(2)$, this imp...
Let $\map P n$ be a [[Definition:Propositional Function|propositional function]] depending on $n \in \Z$. Let $n_0 \in \Z$ be given. Suppose that: :$(1): \quad \map P {n_0}$ is [[Definition:True|true]] :$(2): \quad \forall k \in \Z: k \ge n_0: \map P {n_0} \land \map P {n_0 + 1} \land \ldots \land \map P {k - 1} \...
For each $n \ge n_0$, let $\map {P'} n$ be defined as: :$\map {P'} n := \map P {n_0} \land \dots \land \map P n$ It suffices to show that $\map {P'} n$ is true for all $n \ge n_0$. It is immediate from the assumption $\map P {n_0}$ that $\map {P'} {n_0}$ is [[Definition:True|true]]. Now suppose that $\map {P'} n$ ...
Second Principle of Mathematical Induction
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Second_Principle_of_Mathematical_Induction
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Second_Principle_of_Mathematical_Induction
[ "Second Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Mathematical Induction", "Proof Techniques" ]
[ "Definition:Propositional Function", "Definition:True", "Definition:True" ]
[ "Definition:True", "Principle of Mathematical Induction" ]
proofwiki-10603
Second Principle of Mathematical Induction
Let $\map P n$ be a propositional function depending on $n \in \Z$. Let $n_0 \in \Z$ be given. Suppose that: :$(1): \quad \map P {n_0}$ is true :$(2): \quad \forall k \in \Z: k \ge n_0: \map P {n_0} \land \map P {n_0 + 1} \land \ldots \land \map P {k - 1} \land \map P k \implies \map P {k + 1}$ Then: :$\map P n$ is tru...
For each $n \in \N_{>0}$, let $\map {P'} n$ be defined as: :$\map {P'} n := \map P 1 \land \dots \land \map P n$ It suffices to show that $\map {P'} n$ is true for all $n \in \N_{>0}$. It is immediate from the assumption $\map P 1$ that $\map {P'} 1$ is true. Now suppose that $\map {P'} n$ holds. By $(2)$, this implies...
Let $\map P n$ be a [[Definition:Propositional Function|propositional function]] depending on $n \in \Z$. Let $n_0 \in \Z$ be given. Suppose that: :$(1): \quad \map P {n_0}$ is [[Definition:True|true]] :$(2): \quad \forall k \in \Z: k \ge n_0: \map P {n_0} \land \map P {n_0 + 1} \land \ldots \land \map P {k - 1} \...
For each $n \in \N_{>0}$, let $\map {P'} n$ be defined as: :$\map {P'} n := \map P 1 \land \dots \land \map P n$ It suffices to show that $\map {P'} n$ is true for all $n \in \N_{>0}$. It is immediate from the assumption $\map P 1$ that $\map {P'} 1$ is [[Definition:True|true]]. Now suppose that $\map {P'} n$ hold...
Second Principle of Mathematical Induction/One-Based/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Second_Principle_of_Mathematical_Induction
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Second_Principle_of_Mathematical_Induction/One-Based/Proof_1
[ "Second Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Mathematical Induction", "Proof Techniques" ]
[ "Definition:Propositional Function", "Definition:True", "Definition:True" ]
[ "Definition:True", "Principle of Mathematical Induction" ]
proofwiki-10604
Second Principle of Mathematical Induction
Let $\map P n$ be a propositional function depending on $n \in \Z$. Let $n_0 \in \Z$ be given. Suppose that: :$(1): \quad \map P {n_0}$ is true :$(2): \quad \forall k \in \Z: k \ge n_0: \map P {n_0} \land \map P {n_0 + 1} \land \ldots \land \map P {k - 1} \land \map P k \implies \map P {k + 1}$ Then: :$\map P n$ is tru...
Let $S \subseteq \N_{>0}$ containing those $n \in \N_{>0}$ for which $\map P n$ does not hold. {{AimForCont}} $S \ne \O$. Then by the Well-Ordering Principle $S$ contains a minimal element $s$. We have that $s \ne 1$ because $\map P 1$ is true from $(1)$. Thus there must exist some $k \in \N_{>0}$ such that $s = k + 1$...
Let $\map P n$ be a [[Definition:Propositional Function|propositional function]] depending on $n \in \Z$. Let $n_0 \in \Z$ be given. Suppose that: :$(1): \quad \map P {n_0}$ is [[Definition:True|true]] :$(2): \quad \forall k \in \Z: k \ge n_0: \map P {n_0} \land \map P {n_0 + 1} \land \ldots \land \map P {k - 1} \...
Let $S \subseteq \N_{>0}$ containing those $n \in \N_{>0}$ for which $\map P n$ does not hold. {{AimForCont}} $S \ne \O$. Then by the [[Well-Ordering Principle]] $S$ contains a [[Definition:Minimal Element|minimal element]] $s$. We have that $s \ne 1$ because $\map P 1$ is true from $(1)$. Thus there must exist som...
Second Principle of Mathematical Induction/One-Based/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Second_Principle_of_Mathematical_Induction
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Second_Principle_of_Mathematical_Induction/One-Based/Proof_2
[ "Second Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Mathematical Induction", "Proof Techniques" ]
[ "Definition:Propositional Function", "Definition:True", "Definition:True" ]
[ "Well-Ordering Principle", "Definition:Minimal/Element", "Definition:Minimal/Element", "Definition:Contradiction", "Proof by Contradiction" ]
proofwiki-10605
Second Principle of Finite Induction
Let $S \subseteq \Z$ be a subset of the integers. Let $n_0 \in \Z$ be given. Suppose that: :$(1): \quad n_0 \in S$ :$(2): \quad \forall n \ge n_0: \paren {\forall k: n_0 \le k \le n \implies k \in S} \implies n + 1 \in S$ Then: :$\forall n \ge n_0: n \in S$
Define $T$ as: :$T = \set {n \in \Z : \forall k: n_0 \le k \le n: k \in S}$ Since $n \le n$, it follows that $T \subseteq S$. Therefore, it will suffice to show that: :$\forall n \ge n_0: n \in T$ Firstly, we have that $n_0 \in T$ {{iff}} the following condition holds: :$\forall k: n_0 \le k \le n_0 \implies k \in S$ S...
Let $S \subseteq \Z$ be a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of the [[Definition:Integer|integers]]. Let $n_0 \in \Z$ be given. Suppose that: :$(1): \quad n_0 \in S$ :$(2): \quad \forall n \ge n_0: \paren {\forall k: n_0 \le k \le n \implies k \in S} \implies n + 1 \in S$ Then: :$\forall n \ge n_0: n \in S$
Define $T$ as: :$T = \set {n \in \Z : \forall k: n_0 \le k \le n: k \in S}$ Since $n \le n$, it follows that $T \subseteq S$. Therefore, it will suffice to show that: :$\forall n \ge n_0: n \in T$ Firstly, we have that $n_0 \in T$ {{iff}} the following condition holds: :$\forall k: n_0 \le k \le n_0 \implies k \...
Second Principle of Finite Induction
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Second_Principle_of_Finite_Induction
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Second_Principle_of_Finite_Induction
[ "Second Principle of Finite Induction", "Principle of Finite Induction", "Mathematical Induction", "Proof Techniques", "Named Theorems" ]
[ "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Integer" ]
[ "Closed Interval of Naturally Ordered Semigroup with Successor equals Union with Successor", "Principle of Finite Induction" ]
proofwiki-10606
Sign of Cosine
Let $x$ be a real number. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \cos x | o = > | r = 0 | c = if there exists an integer $n$ such that $\paren {2 n - \dfrac 1 2} \pi < x < \paren {2 n + \dfrac 1 2} \pi$ }} {{eqn | l = \cos x | o = < | r = 0 | c = if there exists an integer $n$ such that $\p...
Proof by induction:
Let $x$ be a [[Definition:Real Number|real number]]. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \cos x | o = > | r = 0 | c = if there exists an [[Definition:Integer|integer]] $n$ such that $\paren {2 n - \dfrac 1 2} \pi < x < \paren {2 n + \dfrac 1 2} \pi$ }} {{eqn | l = \cos x | o = < | r = 0 ...
Proof by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]]:
Sign of Cosine
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sign_of_Cosine
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sign_of_Cosine
[ "Cosine Function" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Cosine/Real Function" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Principle of Mathematical Induction" ]
proofwiki-10607
Sign of Tangent
Let $x$ be a real number. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \tan x | o = > | r = 0 | c = if there exists an integer $n$ such that $n \pi < x < \paren {n + \dfrac 1 2} \pi$ }} {{eqn | l = \tan x | o = < | r = 0 | c = if there exists an integer $n$ such that $\paren {n + \dfrac 1 2} \pi ...
From Tangent is Sine divided by Cosine: :$\tan x = \dfrac {\sin x} {\cos x}$ Since $n$ is an integer, $n$ is either odd or even.
Let $x$ be a [[Definition:Real Number|real number]]. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \tan x | o = > | r = 0 | c = if there exists an [[Definition:Integer|integer]] $n$ such that $n \pi < x < \paren {n + \dfrac 1 2} \pi$ }} {{eqn | l = \tan x | o = < | r = 0 | c = if there exists an...
From [[Tangent is Sine divided by Cosine]]: :$\tan x = \dfrac {\sin x} {\cos x}$ Since $n$ is an integer, $n$ is either odd or even.
Sign of Tangent
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sign_of_Tangent
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sign_of_Tangent
[ "Tangent Function" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Tangent Function" ]
[ "Tangent is Sine divided by Cosine" ]
proofwiki-10608
Reciprocal of Strictly Negative Real Number is Strictly Negative
:$\forall x \in \R: x < 0 \implies \dfrac 1 x < 0$
Let $x < 0$. {{AimForCont}} $\dfrac 1 x > 0$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | o = < | r = 0 | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = x \times \dfrac 1 x | o = < | r = 0 \times 0 | c = Real Number Ordering is Compatible with Multiplication: Negative Factor }} {{eqn | ll= \leadst...
:$\forall x \in \R: x < 0 \implies \dfrac 1 x < 0$
Let $x < 0$. {{AimForCont}} $\dfrac 1 x > 0$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | o = < | r = 0 | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = x \times \dfrac 1 x | o = < | r = 0 \times 0 | c = [[Real Number Ordering is Compatible with Multiplication/Negative Factor|Real Number Orderi...
Reciprocal of Strictly Negative Real Number is Strictly Negative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reciprocal_of_Strictly_Negative_Real_Number_is_Strictly_Negative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reciprocal_of_Strictly_Negative_Real_Number_is_Strictly_Negative
[ "Real Numbers", "Reciprocals" ]
[]
[ "Real Number Ordering is Compatible with Multiplication/Negative Factor", "Real Zero is Less than Real One", "Proof by Contradiction" ]
proofwiki-10609
Sign of Cosecant
Let $x$ be a real number. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \csc x | o = > | r = 0 | c = if there exists an integer $n$ such that $2 n \pi < x < \paren {2 n + 1} \pi$ }} {{eqn | l = \csc x | o = < | r = 0 | c = if there exists an integer $n$ such that $\paren {2 n + 1} \pi < x < \paren...
For the first part: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sin x | o = > | r = 0 | c = if there exists an integer $n$ such that $2 n \pi < x < \paren {2 n + 1} \pi$ | cc= Sign of Sine }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \frac 1 {\sin x} | o = > | r = 0 | c = if there exists an integer $n$ ...
Let $x$ be a [[Definition:Real Number|real number]]. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \csc x | o = > | r = 0 | c = if there exists an [[Definition:Integer|integer]] $n$ such that $2 n \pi < x < \paren {2 n + 1} \pi$ }} {{eqn | l = \csc x | o = < | r = 0 | c = if there exists an [[De...
For the first part: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sin x | o = > | r = 0 | c = if there exists an [[Definition:Integer|integer]] $n$ such that $2 n \pi < x < \paren {2 n + 1} \pi$ | cc= [[Sign of Sine]] }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \frac 1 {\sin x} | o = > | r = 0 | c = if ...
Sign of Cosecant
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sign_of_Cosecant
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sign_of_Cosecant
[ "Cosecant Function" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Cosecant/Real Function" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Sign of Sine", "Definition:Integer", "Reciprocal of Strictly Positive Real Number is Strictly Positive", "Definition:Integer", "Cosecant is Reciprocal of Sine", "Definition:Integer", "Sign of Sine", "Definition:Integer", "Reciprocal of Strictly Negative Real Number is Strict...
proofwiki-10610
Sign of Secant
Let $x$ be a real number. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sec x | o = > | r = 0 | c = if there exists an integer $n$ such that $\paren {2 n - \dfrac 1 2} \pi < x < \paren {2 n + \dfrac 1 2} \pi$ }} {{eqn | l = \sec x | o = < | r = 0 | c = if there exists an integer $n$ such that $\paren {...
For the first part: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \cos x | o = > | r = 0 | c = if there exists an integer $n$ such that $\paren {2 n - \dfrac 1 2} \pi < x < \paren {2 n + \dfrac 1 2} \pi$ | cc= Sign of Cosine }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \frac 1 {\cos x} | o = > | r = 0 | c ...
Let $x$ be a [[Definition:Real Number|real number]]. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sec x | o = > | r = 0 | c = if there exists an [[Definition:Integer|integer]] $n$ such that $\paren {2 n - \dfrac 1 2} \pi < x < \paren {2 n + \dfrac 1 2} \pi$ }} {{eqn | l = \sec x | o = < | r = 0 | c =...
For the first part: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \cos x | o = > | r = 0 | c = if there exists an [[Definition:Integer|integer]] $n$ such that $\paren {2 n - \dfrac 1 2} \pi < x < \paren {2 n + \dfrac 1 2} \pi$ | cc= [[Sign of Cosine]] }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \frac 1 {\cos x} | o ...
Sign of Secant
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sign_of_Secant
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sign_of_Secant
[ "Secant Function" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Secant Function/Real" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Sign of Cosine", "Definition:Integer", "Reciprocal of Strictly Positive Real Number is Strictly Positive", "Definition:Integer", "Secant is Reciprocal of Cosine", "Definition:Integer", "Sign of Cosine", "Definition:Integer", "Reciprocal of Strictly Negative Real Number is St...
proofwiki-10611
Sign of Cotangent
Let $x$ be a real number. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \cot x | o = > | r = 0 | c = if there exists an integer $n$ such that $n \pi < x < \paren {n + \dfrac 1 2} \pi$ }} {{eqn | l = \cot x | o = < | r = 0 | c = if there exists an integer $n$ such that $\paren {n + \dfrac 1 2} \pi ...
For the first part: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \tan x | o = > | r = 0 | c = if there exists an integer $n$ such that $n \pi < x < \paren {n + \dfrac 1 2} \pi$ | cc= Sign of Tangent }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \frac 1 \tan x | o = > | r = 0 | c = if there exists an intege...
Let $x$ be a [[Definition:Real Number|real number]]. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \cot x | o = > | r = 0 | c = if there exists an [[Definition:Integer|integer]] $n$ such that $n \pi < x < \paren {n + \dfrac 1 2} \pi$ }} {{eqn | l = \cot x | o = < | r = 0 | c = if there exists an...
For the first part: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \tan x | o = > | r = 0 | c = if there exists an [[Definition:Integer|integer]] $n$ such that $n \pi < x < \paren {n + \dfrac 1 2} \pi$ | cc= [[Sign of Tangent]] }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \frac 1 \tan x | o = > | r = 0 | c...
Sign of Cotangent
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sign_of_Cotangent
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sign_of_Cotangent
[ "Cotangent Function" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Cotangent/Real Function" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Sign of Tangent", "Definition:Integer", "Reciprocal of Strictly Positive Real Number is Strictly Positive", "Definition:Integer", "Cotangent is Reciprocal of Tangent", "Definition:Integer", "Sign of Tangent", "Definition:Integer", "Reciprocal of Strictly Negative Real Number...
proofwiki-10612
Cosine in terms of Tangent
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \cos x | r = +\frac 1 {\sqrt {1 + \tan^2 x} } | c = if there exists an integer $n$ such that $\paren {2 n - \dfrac 1 2} \pi < x < \paren {2 n + \dfrac 1 2} \pi$ }} {{eqn | l = \cos x | r = -\frac 1 {\sqrt {1 + \tan^2 x} } | c = if there exists an integer $n$ such that $...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sec^2 x - \tan^2 x | r = 1 | c = Difference of Squares of Secant and Tangent }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \sec^2 x | r = 1 + \tan ^2 x }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \frac 1 {\cos^2 x} | r = 1 + \tan^2 x | c = Secant is Reciprocal of Cosine }} {{eqn |...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \cos x | r = +\frac 1 {\sqrt {1 + \tan^2 x} } | c = if there exists an [[Definition:Integer|integer]] $n$ such that $\paren {2 n - \dfrac 1 2} \pi < x < \paren {2 n + \dfrac 1 2} \pi$ }} {{eqn | l = \cos x | r = -\frac 1 {\sqrt {1 + \tan^2 x} } | c = if there exists an ...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sec^2 x - \tan^2 x | r = 1 | c = [[Difference of Squares of Secant and Tangent]] }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \sec^2 x | r = 1 + \tan ^2 x }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \frac 1 {\cos^2 x} | r = 1 + \tan^2 x | c = [[Secant is Reciprocal of Cosine]] }}...
Cosine in terms of Tangent
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cosine_in_terms_of_Tangent
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cosine_in_terms_of_Tangent
[ "Cosine Function", "Tangent Function" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Integer" ]
[ "Sum of Squares of Sine and Cosine/Corollary 1", "Secant is Reciprocal of Cosine", "Sign of Cosine", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Integer" ]
proofwiki-10613
Tangent in terms of Secant
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \tan x | r = +\sqrt {\sec^2 x - 1} | c = if there exists an integer $n$ such that $n \pi < x < \paren {n + \dfrac 1 2} \pi$ }} {{eqn | l = \tan x | r = -\sqrt {\sec^2 x - 1} | c = if there exists an integer $n$ such that $\paren {n + \dfrac 1 2} \pi < x < \paren {n + 1}...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sec^2 x - \tan^2 x | r = 1 | c = Difference of Squares of Secant and Tangent }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \tan^2 x | r = \sec^2 x - 1 }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \tan x | r = \pm \sqrt {\sec^2 x - 1} }} {{end-eqn}} Also, from Sign of Tangent: :If there e...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \tan x | r = +\sqrt {\sec^2 x - 1} | c = if there exists an [[Definition:Integer|integer]] $n$ such that $n \pi < x < \paren {n + \dfrac 1 2} \pi$ }} {{eqn | l = \tan x | r = -\sqrt {\sec^2 x - 1} | c = if there exists an [[Definition:Integer|integer]] $n$ such that $\p...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sec^2 x - \tan^2 x | r = 1 | c = [[Difference of Squares of Secant and Tangent]] }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \tan^2 x | r = \sec^2 x - 1 }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \tan x | r = \pm \sqrt {\sec^2 x - 1} }} {{end-eqn}} Also, from [[Sign of Tangent]]: :...
Tangent in terms of Secant
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Tangent_in_terms_of_Secant
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Tangent_in_terms_of_Secant
[ "Tangent Function", "Secant Function" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Integer" ]
[ "Sum of Squares of Sine and Cosine/Corollary 1", "Sign of Tangent", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Integer" ]
proofwiki-10614
Union of Left-Total Relations is Left-Total
Let $S_1, S_2, T_1, T_2$ be sets or classes. Let $\RR_1 \subseteq S_1 \times T_1$ and $\RR_2 \subseteq S_2 \times T_2$ be left-total relations. Then $\RR_1 \cup \RR_2$ is left-total.
Let both $\RR_1$ and $\RR_2$ be left-total. Let $\RR = \RR_1 \cup \RR_2$. Let $s \in S_1 \cup S_2$. By the definition of union: :$s \in S_1 \lor s \in S_2$ Thus $s \in S_i$ for $i \in \set {1, 2}$. By definition of left-total relation, there is a $t \in T_i$ such that $\tuple {s, t} \in \RR_i$. We have that $\RR$ is a ...
Let $S_1, S_2, T_1, T_2$ be [[Definition:Set|sets]] or [[Definition:Class (Class Theory)|classes]]. Let $\RR_1 \subseteq S_1 \times T_1$ and $\RR_2 \subseteq S_2 \times T_2$ be [[Definition:Left-Total Relation|left-total relations]]. Then $\RR_1 \cup \RR_2$ is [[Definition:Left-Total Relation|left-total]].
Let both $\RR_1$ and $\RR_2$ be [[Definition:Left-Total Relation|left-total]]. Let $\RR = \RR_1 \cup \RR_2$. Let $s \in S_1 \cup S_2$. By the definition of [[Definition:Set Union|union]]: :$s \in S_1 \lor s \in S_2$ Thus $s \in S_i$ for $i \in \set {1, 2}$. By definition of [[Definition:Left-Total Relation|left-to...
Union of Left-Total Relations is Left-Total
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_of_Left-Total_Relations_is_Left-Total
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_of_Left-Total_Relations_is_Left-Total
[ "Relation Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Class (Class Theory)", "Definition:Left-Total Relation", "Definition:Left-Total Relation" ]
[ "Definition:Left-Total Relation", "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Left-Total Relation", "Definition:Subset/Superset", "Union is Smallest Superset" ]
proofwiki-10615
Union of Inverse of Relations is Inverse of their Union
For $i \in \set {1, 2}$, let $\RR_i \subseteq S_i \times T_i$ be relations on $S_i \times T_i$. Let ${\RR_i}^{-1} \subseteq T_i \times S_i$ be the inverse of $\RR_i$. Then: :${\RR_1}^{-1} \cup {\RR_2}^{-1} = \paren {\RR_1 \cup \RR_2}^{-1}$
Let $\tuple {t, s} \in {\RR_1}^{-1} \cup {\RR_2}^{-1}$. By definition of union: :$\tuple {t, s} \in {\RR_1}^{-1} \lor \tuple {t, s} \in {\RR_2}^{-1}$. For $i \in \set {1, 2}$, let $\tuple {t, s} \in {\RR_i}^{-1}$. By definition of inverse: :$\tuple {s, t} \in \RR_i$ That is: :$\tuple {s, t} \in \RR_1 \lor \tuple {s, t}...
For $i \in \set {1, 2}$, let $\RR_i \subseteq S_i \times T_i$ be [[Definition:Relation|relations]] on $S_i \times T_i$. Let ${\RR_i}^{-1} \subseteq T_i \times S_i$ be the [[Definition:Inverse Relation|inverse]] of $\RR_i$. Then: :${\RR_1}^{-1} \cup {\RR_2}^{-1} = \paren {\RR_1 \cup \RR_2}^{-1}$
Let $\tuple {t, s} \in {\RR_1}^{-1} \cup {\RR_2}^{-1}$. By definition of [[Definition:Set Union|union]]: :$\tuple {t, s} \in {\RR_1}^{-1} \lor \tuple {t, s} \in {\RR_2}^{-1}$. For $i \in \set {1, 2}$, let $\tuple {t, s} \in {\RR_i}^{-1}$. By definition of [[Definition:Inverse_Relation|inverse]]: :$\tuple {s, t} \...
Union of Inverse of Relations is Inverse of their Union
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_of_Inverse_of_Relations_is_Inverse_of_their_Union
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_of_Inverse_of_Relations_is_Inverse_of_their_Union
[ "Inverse Relations", "Set Union" ]
[ "Definition:Relation", "Definition:Inverse Relation" ]
[ "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Inverse_Relation", "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Inverse_Relation", "Category:Inverse Relations", "Category:Set Union" ]
proofwiki-10616
Condition for Darboux Integrability
Let $\closedint a b$ be a closed real interval. Let $f$ be a bounded real function defined on $\closedint a b$. Then $f$ is Darboux integrable {{iff}}: :for every $\epsilon \in \R_{>0}$, there exists a finite subdivision $S$ of $\closedint a b$ such that $\map U S - \map L S < \epsilon$ where :$\map U S$ is the upper D...
=== Necessary Condition === Let $f$ be Darboux integrable. Let $\epsilon \in \R_{>0}$ be given. It is to be proved that a finite subdivision $S$ of $\closedint a b$ exists such that: :$\map U S - \map L S < \epsilon$ As $f$ is Darboux integrable: :$\ds \int_a^b \map f x \rd x$ exists. By the definition of the Darboux i...
Let $\closedint a b$ be a [[Definition:Closed Real Interval|closed real interval]]. Let $f$ be a [[Definition:Bounded Real-Valued Function|bounded]] [[Definition:Real Function|real function]] defined on $\closedint a b$. Then $f$ is [[Definition:Darboux Integrable Function|Darboux integrable]] {{iff}}: :for every $\...
=== Necessary Condition === Let $f$ be [[Definition:Darboux Integrable Function|Darboux integrable]]. Let $\epsilon \in \R_{>0}$ be given. It is to be proved that a [[Definition:Finite Subdivision|finite subdivision]] $S$ of $\closedint a b$ exists such that: :$\map U S - \map L S < \epsilon$ As $f$ is [[Definitio...
Condition for Darboux Integrability
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Condition_for_Darboux_Integrability
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Condition_for_Darboux_Integrability
[ "Integral Calculus", "Darboux Integrable Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Real Interval/Closed", "Definition:Bounded Mapping/Real-Valued", "Definition:Real Function", "Definition:Darboux Integrable Function", "Definition:Subdivision of Interval/Finite", "Definition:Upper Darboux Sum", "Definition:Lower Darboux Sum" ]
[ "Definition:Darboux Integrable Function", "Definition:Subdivision of Interval/Finite", "Definition:Darboux Integrable Function", "Definition:Definite Integral/Darboux", "Definition:Lower Darboux Integral", "Definition:Lower Darboux Integral", "Definition:Lower Darboux Sum", "Definition:Subdivision of ...
proofwiki-10617
Open Set minus Closed Set is Open
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. For $A \subseteq S$ denote by $\relcomp S A$ the relative complement of $A$ in $S$. Let $U \in \tau$ and $\relcomp S V \in \tau$. Then: :$U \setminus V \in \tau$ and: :$\relcomp S {V \setminus U} \in \tau$
From Set Difference as Intersection with Relative Complement: :$U \setminus V = U \cap \relcomp S V$ Since $\tau$ is a topology: :$U, \relcomp S V \in \tau \implies U \cap \relcomp S V \in \tau \implies U \setminus V \in \tau$ The other statement follows {{mutatis}}. {{qed}}
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. For $A \subseteq S$ denote by $\relcomp S A$ the [[Definition:Relative Complement|relative complement]] of $A$ in $S$. Let $U \in \tau$ and $\relcomp S V \in \tau$. Then: :$U \setminus V \in \tau$ and: :$\relcomp S {V \setminus U} ...
From [[Set Difference as Intersection with Relative Complement]]: :$U \setminus V = U \cap \relcomp S V$ Since $\tau$ is a [[Definition:Topology|topology]]: :$U, \relcomp S V \in \tau \implies U \cap \relcomp S V \in \tau \implies U \setminus V \in \tau$ The other statement follows {{mutatis}}. {{qed}}
Open Set minus Closed Set is Open
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Open_Set_minus_Closed_Set_is_Open
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Open_Set_minus_Closed_Set_is_Open
[ "Open Sets", "Closed Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Relative Complement" ]
[ "Set Difference as Intersection with Relative Complement", "Definition:Topology" ]
proofwiki-10618
Union of Right-Total Relations is Right-Total
Let $S_1, S_2, T_1, T_2$ be sets or classes. Let $\RR_1 \subseteq S_1 \times T_1$ and $\RR_2 \subseteq S_2 \times T_2$ be right-total relations. Then $\RR_1 \cup \RR_2$ is right-total.
Define the predicates $L$ and $R$ by: :$\map L X \iff \text {$X$ is left-total}$ :$\map R X \iff \text {$X$ is right-total}$ {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map R {\RR_1} \land \map R {\RR_2} | o = \leadsto | r = \map L {\RR_1^{-1} } \land \map L {\RR_2^{-1} } | c = Inverse of Right-Total Relation is Left-...
Let $S_1, S_2, T_1, T_2$ be [[Definition:Set|sets]] or [[Definition:Class (Class Theory)|classes]]. Let $\RR_1 \subseteq S_1 \times T_1$ and $\RR_2 \subseteq S_2 \times T_2$ be [[Definition:Right-Total Relation|right-total]] [[Definition:Relation|relations]]. Then $\RR_1 \cup \RR_2$ is [[Definition:Right-Total Relat...
Define the [[Definition:Predicate|predicates]] $L$ and $R$ by: :$\map L X \iff \text {$X$ is left-total}$ :$\map R X \iff \text {$X$ is right-total}$ {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map R {\RR_1} \land \map R {\RR_2} | o = \leadsto | r = \map L {\RR_1^{-1} } \land \map L {\RR_2^{-1} } | c = [[Inverse of ...
Union of Right-Total Relations is Right-Total
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_of_Right-Total_Relations_is_Right-Total
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_of_Right-Total_Relations_is_Right-Total
[ "Relation Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Class (Class Theory)", "Definition:Right-Total Relation", "Definition:Relation", "Definition:Right-Total Relation" ]
[ "Definition:Predicate", "Inverse of Right-Total Relation is Left-Total", "Union of Left-Total Relations is Left-Total", "Union of Inverse of Relations is Inverse of their Union", "Inverse of Right-Total Relation is Left-Total" ]
proofwiki-10619
Primitive of x over a x + b squared by p x + q/Corollary
:$\ds \int \frac {x \rd x} {\paren {a x + b}^2 \paren {p x + q} } = \frac 1 {b p - a q} \paren {\frac q {b p - a q} \ln \size {\frac {a x + b} {p x + q} } + \frac x {a x + b} } + C$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int \frac {x \rd x} {\paren {a x + b}^2 \paren {p x + q} } | r = \frac 1 {b p - a q} \paren {\frac q {b p - a q} \ln \size {\frac {a x + b} {p x + q} } - \frac b {a \paren {a x + b} } } + C | c = Primitive of $\dfrac x {\paren {a x + b}^2 \paren {p x + q} }$ }} {{eqn | r = \frac 1...
:$\ds \int \frac {x \rd x} {\paren {a x + b}^2 \paren {p x + q} } = \frac 1 {b p - a q} \paren {\frac q {b p - a q} \ln \size {\frac {a x + b} {p x + q} } + \frac x {a x + b} } + C$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int \frac {x \rd x} {\paren {a x + b}^2 \paren {p x + q} } | r = \frac 1 {b p - a q} \paren {\frac q {b p - a q} \ln \size {\frac {a x + b} {p x + q} } - \frac b {a \paren {a x + b} } } + C | c = [[Primitive of x over a x + b squared by p x + q|Primitive of $\dfrac x {\paren {a x ...
Primitive of x over a x + b squared by p x + q/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_x_over_a_x_+_b_squared_by_p_x_+_q/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_x_over_a_x_+_b_squared_by_p_x_+_q/Corollary
[ "Primitive of x over a x + b squared by p x + q", "Primitives involving a x + b and p x + q" ]
[]
[ "Primitive of x over a x + b squared by p x + q", "Category:Primitive of x over a x + b squared by p x + q", "Category:Primitives involving a x + b and p x + q" ]
proofwiki-10620
Arctangent of Imaginary Number
Let $x$ belong to the open real interval $\openint {-1} 1$. Then: :$\map {\tan^{-1} } {i x} = \dfrac i 2 \map \ln {\dfrac {1 + x} {1 - x} }$ where $\tan$ is the complex tangent function, $\ln$ is the real natural logarithm, and $i$ is the imaginary unit.
Let $y = \map {\tan^{-1} } {i x}$. Let $x = \tanh \theta$, then $\theta = \tanh^{-1} x$. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \tan y | r = i x | c = }} {{eqn | l = \tan y | r = i \tanh \theta | c = }} {{eqn | l = \tan y | r = \map \tan {i \theta} | c = Hyperbolic Tangent in terms of Tangent }...
Let $x$ belong to the [[Definition:Open Real Interval|open real interval]] $\openint {-1} 1$. Then: :$\map {\tan^{-1} } {i x} = \dfrac i 2 \map \ln {\dfrac {1 + x} {1 - x} }$ where $\tan$ is the [[Definition:Complex Tangent Function|complex tangent function]], $\ln$ is the [[Definition:Real Natural Logarithm|real natu...
Let $y = \map {\tan^{-1} } {i x}$. Let $x = \tanh \theta$, then $\theta = \tanh^{-1} x$. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \tan y | r = i x | c = }} {{eqn | l = \tan y | r = i \tanh \theta | c = }} {{eqn | l = \tan y | r = \map \tan {i \theta} | c = [[Hyperbolic Tangent in terms of Tange...
Arctangent of Imaginary Number
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Arctangent_of_Imaginary_Number
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Arctangent_of_Imaginary_Number
[ "Complex Numbers", "Tangent Function" ]
[ "Definition:Real Interval/Open", "Definition:Tangent Function/Complex", "Definition:Natural Logarithm/Positive Real", "Definition:Complex Number/Imaginary Unit" ]
[ "Hyperbolic Tangent in terms of Tangent", "Category:Complex Numbers", "Category:Tangent Function" ]
proofwiki-10621
Equivalence of Definitions of Real Area Hyperbolic Tangent
Let $S$ denote the open real interval: :$S := \openint {-1} 1$ {{TFAE|def = Real Area Hyperbolic Tangent}}
=== Definition 1 implies Definition 2 === Let $x = \tanh y$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | r = \frac {e^{2 y} - 1} {e^{2 y} + 1} | c = {{Defof|Hyperbolic Tangent|index = 3}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = x e^{2 y} + x | r = e^{2 y} - 1 | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = e^{2 ...
Let $S$ denote the [[Definition:Open Real Interval|open real interval]]: :$S := \openint {-1} 1$ {{TFAE|def = Real Area Hyperbolic Tangent}}
=== Definition 1 implies Definition 2 === Let $x = \tanh y$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | r = \frac {e^{2 y} - 1} {e^{2 y} + 1} | c = {{Defof|Hyperbolic Tangent|index = 3}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = x e^{2 y} + x | r = e^{2 y} - 1 | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = e^{...
Equivalence of Definitions of Real Area Hyperbolic Tangent
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Real_Area_Hyperbolic_Tangent
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Real_Area_Hyperbolic_Tangent
[ "Inverse Hyperbolic Tangent" ]
[ "Definition:Real Interval/Open" ]
[]
proofwiki-10622
Square Root is Strictly Increasing
The positive square root function is strictly increasing, that is: :$\forall x, y \in \R_{>0}: x < y \implies \sqrt x < \sqrt y$
Let $x$ and $y$ be positive real numbers such that $x < y$. {{AimForCont}} $\sqrt x \ge \sqrt y$. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | l = \sqrt x | o = \ge | r = \sqrt y | c = }} {{eqn | n = 2 | l = \sqrt x | o = \ge | r = \sqrt y | c = }} {{eqn | l = x | o = \ge ...
The [[Definition:Positive Square Root|positive square root function]] is [[Definition:Strictly Increasing Real Function|strictly increasing]], that is: :$\forall x, y \in \R_{>0}: x < y \implies \sqrt x < \sqrt y$
Let $x$ and $y$ be [[Definition:Positive/Real Number|positive real numbers]] such that $x < y$. {{AimForCont}} $\sqrt x \ge \sqrt y$. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | l = \sqrt x | o = \ge | r = \sqrt y | c = }} {{eqn | n = 2 | l = \sqrt x | o = \ge | r = \sqrt y | c = }...
Square Root is Strictly Increasing
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Square_Root_is_Strictly_Increasing
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Square_Root_is_Strictly_Increasing
[ "Real Numbers", "Square Roots", "Examples of Strictly Increasing Real Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Square Root/Positive", "Definition:Strictly Increasing/Real Function" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Real Number", "Proof by Contradiction", "Category:Real Numbers", "Category:Square Roots", "Category:Examples of Strictly Increasing Real Functions" ]
proofwiki-10623
Minimum of Real Hyperbolic Cosine Function
Let $x$ be a real number. Then: :$\cosh x \ge 1$ where $\cosh$ denotes the hyperbolic cosine function.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \cosh^2 x - \sinh^2 x | r = 1 | c = Difference of Squares of Hyperbolic Cosine and Sine }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \cosh^2 x | r = 1 + \sinh^2 x | c = }} {{eqn | o = \ge | r = 1 | c = Square of Real Number is Non-Negative }} {{end-eqn}} Furthermore...
Let $x$ be a [[Definition:Real Number|real number]]. Then: :$\cosh x \ge 1$ where $\cosh$ denotes the [[Definition:Hyperbolic Cosine|hyperbolic cosine function]].
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \cosh^2 x - \sinh^2 x | r = 1 | c = [[Difference of Squares of Hyperbolic Cosine and Sine]] }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \cosh^2 x | r = 1 + \sinh^2 x | c = }} {{eqn | o = \ge | r = 1 | c = [[Square of Real Number is Non-Negative]] }} {{end-eqn}} Fu...
Minimum of Real Hyperbolic Cosine Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Minimum_of_Real_Hyperbolic_Cosine_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Minimum_of_Real_Hyperbolic_Cosine_Function
[ "Hyperbolic Cosine Function" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Hyperbolic Cosine" ]
[ "Difference of Squares of Hyperbolic Cosine and Sine", "Square of Real Number is Non-Negative", "Category:Hyperbolic Cosine Function" ]
proofwiki-10624
Exponential of Real Number is Strictly Positive
Let $x$ be a real number. Let $\exp$ denote the (real) exponential function. Then: :$\forall x \in \R : \exp x > 0$
This proof assumes the series definition of $\exp$. That is, let: :$\ds \exp x = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \dfrac {x^n} {n!}$ First, suppose $0 < x$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 0 | o = < | r = x^n | c = Power Function is Strictly Increasing over Positive Reals: Natural Exponent }} {{eqn | ll= \...
Let $x$ be a [[Definition:Real Number|real number]]. Let $\exp$ denote the [[Definition:Real Exponential Function|(real) exponential function]]. Then: :$\forall x \in \R : \exp x > 0$
This proof assumes the [[Definition:Exponential Function/Real/Power Series Expansion|series definition of $\exp$]]. That is, let: :$\ds \exp x = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \dfrac {x^n} {n!}$ First, suppose $0 < x$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 0 | o = < | r = x^n | c = [[Power Function is Str...
Exponential of Real Number is Strictly Positive/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Exponential_of_Real_Number_is_Strictly_Positive
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Exponential_of_Real_Number_is_Strictly_Positive/Proof_1
[ "Exponential Function", "Exponential of Real Number is Strictly Positive" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Exponential Function/Real" ]
[ "Definition:Exponential Function/Real/Power Series Expansion", "Power Function is Strictly Increasing over Positive Reals/Natural Exponent", "Real Number Ordering is Compatible with Multiplication", "Ordering of Series of Ordered Sequences", "Definition:Strictly Positive Real Function", "Exponential of Ze...
proofwiki-10625
Exponential of Real Number is Strictly Positive
Let $x$ be a real number. Let $\exp$ denote the (real) exponential function. Then: :$\forall x \in \R : \exp x > 0$
This proof assumes the limit definition of $\exp$. That is, let: :$\ds \exp x = \lim_{n \mathop \to \infty} \map {f_n} x$ where $\map {f_n} x = \paren {1 + \dfrac x n}^n$ First, fix $x \in \R$. Let $N = \ceiling {\size x}$, where $\ceiling {\, \cdot \,}$ denotes the ceiling function. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \ex...
Let $x$ be a [[Definition:Real Number|real number]]. Let $\exp$ denote the [[Definition:Real Exponential Function|(real) exponential function]]. Then: :$\forall x \in \R : \exp x > 0$
This proof assumes the [[Definition:Exponential Function/Real/Limit of Sequence|limit definition of $\exp$]]. That is, let: :$\ds \exp x = \lim_{n \mathop \to \infty} \map {f_n} x$ where $\map {f_n} x = \paren {1 + \dfrac x n}^n$ First, fix $x \in \R$. Let $N = \ceiling {\size x}$, where $\ceiling {\, \cdot \,}$ de...
Exponential of Real Number is Strictly Positive/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Exponential_of_Real_Number_is_Strictly_Positive
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Exponential_of_Real_Number_is_Strictly_Positive/Proof_2
[ "Exponential Function", "Exponential of Real Number is Strictly Positive" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Exponential Function/Real" ]
[ "Definition:Exponential Function/Real/Limit of Sequence", "Definition:Ceiling Function", "Tail of Convergent Sequence", "Exponential Sequence is Eventually Increasing", "Limit of Bounded Convergent Sequence is Bounded", "Exponential Sequence is Eventually Increasing", "Exponential Sequence is Eventually...
proofwiki-10626
Exponential of Real Number is Strictly Positive
Let $x$ be a real number. Let $\exp$ denote the (real) exponential function. Then: :$\forall x \in \R : \exp x > 0$
This proof assumes the definition of $\exp x$ as the unique continuous extension of $e^x$. Since $e > 0$, the result follows immediately from Power of Positive Real Number is Positive over Rationals. {{qed}}
Let $x$ be a [[Definition:Real Number|real number]]. Let $\exp$ denote the [[Definition:Real Exponential Function|(real) exponential function]]. Then: :$\forall x \in \R : \exp x > 0$
This proof assumes the [[Definition:Exponential Function/Real/Extension of Rational Exponential|definition of $\exp x$ as the unique continuous extension of $e^x$]]. Since $e > 0$, the result follows immediately from [[Power of Positive Real Number is Positive/Rational Number|Power of Positive Real Number is Positive...
Exponential of Real Number is Strictly Positive/Proof 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Exponential_of_Real_Number_is_Strictly_Positive
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Exponential_of_Real_Number_is_Strictly_Positive/Proof_3
[ "Exponential Function", "Exponential of Real Number is Strictly Positive" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Exponential Function/Real" ]
[ "Definition:Exponential Function/Real/Extension of Rational Exponential", "Power of Positive Real Number is Positive/Rational Number" ]
proofwiki-10627
Exponential of Real Number is Strictly Positive
Let $x$ be a real number. Let $\exp$ denote the (real) exponential function. Then: :$\forall x \in \R : \exp x > 0$
This proof assumes the definition of $\exp$ as the inverse mapping of extension of $\ln$, where $\ln$ denotes the natural logarithm. Recall that the domain of $\ln$ is $\R_{>0}$. From the definition of inverse mapping, the image of $\exp$ is the domain of $\ln$. That is, the image of $\exp$ is $\R_{>0}$. Hence the resu...
Let $x$ be a [[Definition:Real Number|real number]]. Let $\exp$ denote the [[Definition:Real Exponential Function|(real) exponential function]]. Then: :$\forall x \in \R : \exp x > 0$
This proof assumes the [[Definition:Exponential Function/Real/Inverse of Natural Logarithm|definition of $\exp$ as the inverse mapping of extension of $\ln$]], where $\ln$ denotes the [[Definition:Natural Logarithm|natural logarithm]]. Recall that the [[Definition:Domain of Mapping|domain]] of $\ln$ is $\R_{>0}$. Fr...
Exponential of Real Number is Strictly Positive/Proof 4
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Exponential_of_Real_Number_is_Strictly_Positive
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Exponential_of_Real_Number_is_Strictly_Positive/Proof_4
[ "Exponential Function", "Exponential of Real Number is Strictly Positive" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Exponential Function/Real" ]
[ "Definition:Exponential Function/Real/Inverse of Natural Logarithm", "Definition:Natural Logarithm", "Definition:Domain (Set Theory)/Mapping", "Definition:Inverse of Mapping", "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Mapping", "Definition:Domain (Set Theory)/Mapping", "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mappin...
proofwiki-10628
Exponential of Real Number is Strictly Positive
Let $x$ be a real number. Let $\exp$ denote the (real) exponential function. Then: :$\forall x \in \R : \exp x > 0$
This proof assumes the definition of $\exp$ as the solution to an initial value problem. That is, suppose $\exp$ satisfies: :$ (1): \quad D_x \exp x = \exp x$ :$ (2): \quad \map \exp 0 = 1$ on $\R$. === Lemma === {{:Exponential of Real Number is Strictly Positive/Proof 5/Lemma}}{{qed|lemma}} {{AimForCont}} that $\exist...
Let $x$ be a [[Definition:Real Number|real number]]. Let $\exp$ denote the [[Definition:Real Exponential Function|(real) exponential function]]. Then: :$\forall x \in \R : \exp x > 0$
This proof assumes the [[Definition:Exponential Function/Real/Differential Equation|definition of $\exp$ as the solution to an initial value problem]]. That is, suppose $\exp$ satisfies: :$ (1): \quad D_x \exp x = \exp x$ :$ (2): \quad \map \exp 0 = 1$ on $\R$. === [[Exponential of Real Number is Strictly Positive/P...
Exponential of Real Number is Strictly Positive/Proof 5
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Exponential_of_Real_Number_is_Strictly_Positive
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Exponential_of_Real_Number_is_Strictly_Positive/Proof_5
[ "Exponential Function", "Exponential of Real Number is Strictly Positive" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Exponential Function/Real" ]
[ "Definition:Exponential Function/Real/Differential Equation", "Exponential of Real Number is Strictly Positive/Proof 5/Lemma", "Intermediate Value Theorem", "Definition:Contradiction", "Exponential of Real Number is Strictly Positive/Proof 5/Lemma" ]
proofwiki-10629
Real Power of Strictly Positive Real Number is Strictly Positive
Let $x$ be a strictly positive real number. Let $y$ be a real number. Then: :$x^y > 0$ where $x^y$ denotes $x$ raised to the $y$th power.
From the definition of power: :$x^y = \exp \left({y \ln x}\right)$ From Exponential of Real Number is Strictly Positive: :$x^y = \exp \left({y \ln x}\right) > 0$ {{qed}} Category:Real Analysis oa8bjlxwrg5kas1mcyixm085z7x58vm
Let $x$ be a [[Definition:Strictly Positive Real Number|strictly positive real number]]. Let $y$ be a [[Definition:Real Number|real number]]. Then: :$x^y > 0$ where $x^y$ denotes $x$ [[Definition:Power to Real Number|raised to the $y$th power]].
From the definition of [[Definition:Power to Real Number|power]]: :$x^y = \exp \left({y \ln x}\right)$ From [[Exponential of Real Number is Strictly Positive]]: :$x^y = \exp \left({y \ln x}\right) > 0$ {{qed}} [[Category:Real Analysis]] oa8bjlxwrg5kas1mcyixm085z7x58vm
Real Power of Strictly Positive Real Number is Strictly Positive
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Power_of_Strictly_Positive_Real_Number_is_Strictly_Positive
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Power_of_Strictly_Positive_Real_Number_is_Strictly_Positive
[ "Real Analysis" ]
[ "Definition:Strictly Positive/Real Number", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Power (Algebra)/Real Number" ]
[ "Definition:Power (Algebra)/Real Number", "Exponential of Real Number is Strictly Positive", "Category:Real Analysis" ]
proofwiki-10630
Derivative of Power of Function
Let $\map u x$ be a differentiable real function of $x$. Let $n$ be a real number such that $n \ne -1$. Then: :$\map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\map u x^n} = n \map u x^{n - 1} \map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\map u x}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\frac \d {\d x} } {\map u x^n} | r = \map {\frac \d {\d u} } {\map u x^n} \map {\frac \d {\d x} } {\map u x} | c = Chain Rule for Derivatives }} {{eqn | r = n \map u x^{n - 1} \map {\frac {\d u} {\d x} } {\map u x} | c = Derivative of Hyperbolic Sine }} {{end-eqn}} {{qe...
Let $\map u x$ be a [[Definition:Differentiable Real Function|differentiable real function]] of $x$. Let $n$ be a [[Definition:Real Number|real number]] such that $n \ne -1$. Then: :$\map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\map u x^n} = n \map u x^{n - 1} \map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\map u x}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\frac \d {\d x} } {\map u x^n} | r = \map {\frac \d {\d u} } {\map u x^n} \map {\frac \d {\d x} } {\map u x} | c = [[Chain Rule for Derivatives]] }} {{eqn | r = n \map u x^{n - 1} \map {\frac {\d u} {\d x} } {\map u x} | c = [[Derivative of Hyperbolic Sine]] }} {{end-eq...
Derivative of Power of Function/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Power_of_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Power_of_Function/Proof_1
[ "Derivative of Power of Function", "Differential Calculus" ]
[ "Definition:Differentiable Mapping/Real Function", "Definition:Real Number" ]
[ "Derivative of Composite Function", "Derivative of Hyperbolic Sine" ]
proofwiki-10631
Derivative of Power of Function
Let $\map u x$ be a differentiable real function of $x$. Let $n$ be a real number such that $n \ne -1$. Then: :$\map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\map u x^n} = n \map u x^{n - 1} \map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\map u x}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\map u x^n} | r = \lim_{h \mathop \to 0} \frac {\paren {\map u {x + h} }^n - \paren {\map u x}^n} h | c = }} {{eqn | r = \paren {\map u x}^n \lim_{h \mathop \to 0} \frac {\paren {\frac {\map u {x + h} } {\map u x} }^n - 1} h | c = Power of Product }...
Let $\map u x$ be a [[Definition:Differentiable Real Function|differentiable real function]] of $x$. Let $n$ be a [[Definition:Real Number|real number]] such that $n \ne -1$. Then: :$\map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\map u x^n} = n \map u x^{n - 1} \map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\map u x}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\map u x^n} | r = \lim_{h \mathop \to 0} \frac {\paren {\map u {x + h} }^n - \paren {\map u x}^n} h | c = }} {{eqn | r = \paren {\map u x}^n \lim_{h \mathop \to 0} \frac {\paren {\frac {\map u {x + h} } {\map u x} }^n - 1} h | c = [[Power of Product...
Derivative of Power of Function/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Power_of_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Power_of_Function/Proof_2
[ "Derivative of Power of Function", "Differential Calculus" ]
[ "Definition:Differentiable Mapping/Real Function", "Definition:Real Number" ]
[ "Exponent Combination Laws/Power of Product", "Derivative of Exponential at Zero", "Derivative of Logarithm at One", "Exponent Combination Laws/Product of Powers" ]
proofwiki-10632
Natural Logarithm of e is 1
:$\ln e = 1$
The definition of the Euler's number as the Base of Logarithm will be used. Then the result follows directly. {{qed}}
:$\ln e = 1$
The [[Definition:Euler's Number/Base of Logarithm|definition of the Euler's number as the Base of Logarithm]] will be used. Then the result follows directly. {{qed}}
Natural Logarithm of e is 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Logarithm_of_e_is_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Logarithm_of_e_is_1
[ "Examples of Natural Logarithms" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Euler's Number/Base of Logarithm" ]
proofwiki-10633
Real Area Hyperbolic Cosine is Strictly Increasing
The real area hyperbolic cosine function is strictly increasing, that is: :$\forall x, y \ge 1 : x < y \implies \arcosh x < \arcosh y$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | l = x | o = < | r = y | c = Assumption }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = x^2 | o = < | r = y^2 | c = {{Real-number-axiom|O2}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = x^2 - 1 | o = < | r = y^2 - 1 | c = }} {{eqn | n = 2 | ll= ...
The [[Definition:Real Area Hyperbolic Cosine|real area hyperbolic cosine]] function is [[Definition:Strictly Increasing Real Function|strictly increasing]], that is: :$\forall x, y \ge 1 : x < y \implies \arcosh x < \arcosh y$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | l = x | o = < | r = y | c = Assumption }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = x^2 | o = < | r = y^2 | c = {{Real-number-axiom|O2}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = x^2 - 1 | o = < | r = y^2 - 1 | c = }} {{eqn | n = 2 | ll= ...
Real Area Hyperbolic Cosine is Strictly Increasing
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Area_Hyperbolic_Cosine_is_Strictly_Increasing
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Area_Hyperbolic_Cosine_is_Strictly_Increasing
[ "Inverse Hyperbolic Cosine", "Examples of Strictly Increasing Real Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Inverse Hyperbolic Cosine/Real/Principal Branch", "Definition:Strictly Increasing/Real Function" ]
[ "Square Root is Strictly Increasing", "Category:Inverse Hyperbolic Cosine", "Category:Examples of Strictly Increasing Real Functions" ]
proofwiki-10634
Laplace Transform of Function of Constant Multiple
Let $a \in \C$ or $\R$ be constant. Then: :$a \laptrans {\map f {a t} } = \map F {\dfrac s a}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a \laptrans {\map f {a t} } | r = a \int_0^{\to + \infty} e^{-s t} \map f {a t} \rd t | c = {{Defof|Laplace Transform}} }} {{eqn | r = a \paren {\frac 1 a} \int_0^{\to + \infty} e^{-s t} \map f {a t} \rd \paren {a t} | c = Primitive of Function of Constant Multiple }} {{eqn |...
Let $a \in \C$ or $\R$ be [[Definition:Constant|constant]]. Then: :$a \laptrans {\map f {a t} } = \map F {\dfrac s a}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a \laptrans {\map f {a t} } | r = a \int_0^{\to + \infty} e^{-s t} \map f {a t} \rd t | c = {{Defof|Laplace Transform}} }} {{eqn | r = a \paren {\frac 1 a} \int_0^{\to + \infty} e^{-s t} \map f {a t} \rd \paren {a t} | c = [[Primitive of Function of Constant Multiple]] }} {{e...
Laplace Transform of Function of Constant Multiple
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Laplace_Transform_of_Function_of_Constant_Multiple
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Laplace_Transform_of_Function_of_Constant_Multiple
[ "Laplace Transform of Function of Constant Multiple", "Properties of Laplace Transforms" ]
[ "Definition:Constant" ]
[ "Primitive of Function of Constant Multiple" ]
proofwiki-10635
Second Translation Property of Laplace Transforms
Let $g$ be the function defined as: :$\map g t = \begin {cases} \map f {t - a} & : t > a \\ 0 & : t \le a \end {cases}$ Then: :$\laptrans {\map g t} = e^{-a s} \map F s$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \laptrans {\map f t} | r = \exp \dfrac {-2 \pi s} 3 \laptrans {\cos t} | c = Second Translation Property of Laplace Transforms }} {{eqn | r = \exp \dfrac {-2 \pi s} 3 \dfrac s {s^2 + 1} | c = Laplace Transform of Cosine }} {{end-eqn}} and the result follows. {{qed}}
Let $g$ be the [[Definition:Function|function]] defined as: :$\map g t = \begin {cases} \map f {t - a} & : t > a \\ 0 & : t \le a \end {cases}$ Then: :$\laptrans {\map g t} = e^{-a s} \map F s$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \laptrans {\map f t} | r = \exp \dfrac {-2 \pi s} 3 \laptrans {\cos t} | c = [[Second Translation Property of Laplace Transforms]] }} {{eqn | r = \exp \dfrac {-2 \pi s} 3 \dfrac s {s^2 + 1} | c = [[Laplace Transform of Cosine]] }} {{end-eqn}} and the result follows. {{qed}}
Second Translation Property of Laplace Transforms/Examples/Example 2/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Second_Translation_Property_of_Laplace_Transforms
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Second_Translation_Property_of_Laplace_Transforms/Examples/Example_2/Proof_1
[ "Second Translation Property of Laplace Transforms", "Properties of Laplace Transforms", "Laplace Transforms", "Exponential Function" ]
[ "Definition:Function" ]
[ "Second Translation Property of Laplace Transforms", "Laplace Transform of Cosine" ]
proofwiki-10636
Second Translation Property of Laplace Transforms
Let $g$ be the function defined as: :$\map g t = \begin {cases} \map f {t - a} & : t > a \\ 0 & : t \le a \end {cases}$ Then: :$\laptrans {\map g t} = e^{-a s} \map F s$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \laptrans {\map f t} | r = \int_0^\infty e^{-s t} \map f t \rd t | c = {{Defof|Laplace Transform}} }} {{eqn | r = \int_0^{\frac {-2 \pi s} 3} e^{-s t} \map f t \rd t + \int_{\frac {-2 \pi s} 3}^\infty e^{-s t} \map f t \rd t | c = }} {{eqn | r = \int_0^{\frac {-2 \pi s} 3} e...
Let $g$ be the [[Definition:Function|function]] defined as: :$\map g t = \begin {cases} \map f {t - a} & : t > a \\ 0 & : t \le a \end {cases}$ Then: :$\laptrans {\map g t} = e^{-a s} \map F s$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \laptrans {\map f t} | r = \int_0^\infty e^{-s t} \map f t \rd t | c = {{Defof|Laplace Transform}} }} {{eqn | r = \int_0^{\frac {-2 \pi s} 3} e^{-s t} \map f t \rd t + \int_{\frac {-2 \pi s} 3}^\infty e^{-s t} \map f t \rd t | c = }} {{eqn | r = \int_0^{\frac {-2 \pi s} 3} e...
Second Translation Property of Laplace Transforms/Examples/Example 2/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Second_Translation_Property_of_Laplace_Transforms
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Second_Translation_Property_of_Laplace_Transforms/Examples/Example_2/Proof_2
[ "Second Translation Property of Laplace Transforms", "Properties of Laplace Transforms", "Laplace Transforms", "Exponential Function" ]
[ "Definition:Function" ]
[ "Integration by Substitution", "Laplace Transform of Cosine" ]
proofwiki-10637
Second Translation Property of Laplace Transforms
Let $g$ be the function defined as: :$\map g t = \begin {cases} \map f {t - a} & : t > a \\ 0 & : t \le a \end {cases}$ Then: :$\laptrans {\map g t} = e^{-a s} \map F s$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \laptrans {\map f {t - a} } | r = \int_0^{\to + \infty} e^{-s t} \map f {t - a} \rd t | c = {{Defof|Laplace Transform}} }} {{eqn | r = \int_0^{\to + \infty} e^{-s \paren {t - a} } e^{-a s} \map f {t - a} \rd \paren {t - a} | c = }} {{eqn | r = e^{-a s} \int_0^{\to + \infty} ...
Let $g$ be the [[Definition:Function|function]] defined as: :$\map g t = \begin {cases} \map f {t - a} & : t > a \\ 0 & : t \le a \end {cases}$ Then: :$\laptrans {\map g t} = e^{-a s} \map F s$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \laptrans {\map f {t - a} } | r = \int_0^{\to + \infty} e^{-s t} \map f {t - a} \rd t | c = {{Defof|Laplace Transform}} }} {{eqn | r = \int_0^{\to + \infty} e^{-s \paren {t - a} } e^{-a s} \map f {t - a} \rd \paren {t - a} | c = }} {{eqn | r = e^{-a s} \int_0^{\to + \infty} ...
Second Translation Property of Laplace Transforms/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Second_Translation_Property_of_Laplace_Transforms
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Second_Translation_Property_of_Laplace_Transforms/Proof_1
[ "Second Translation Property of Laplace Transforms", "Properties of Laplace Transforms", "Laplace Transforms", "Exponential Function" ]
[ "Definition:Function" ]
[]
proofwiki-10638
Second Translation Property of Laplace Transforms
Let $g$ be the function defined as: :$\map g t = \begin {cases} \map f {t - a} & : t > a \\ 0 & : t \le a \end {cases}$ Then: :$\laptrans {\map g t} = e^{-a s} \map F s$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \laptrans {\map g t} | r = \int_0^\infty e^{-s t} \map g t \rd t | c = {{Defof|Laplace Transform}} }} {{eqn | r = \int_0^a e^{-s t} \map g t \rd t + \int_a^\infty e^{-s t} \map g t \rd t | c = }} {{eqn | r = \int_0^a 0 \times e^{-s t} \rd t + \int_a^\infty e^{-s t} \map f {t...
Let $g$ be the [[Definition:Function|function]] defined as: :$\map g t = \begin {cases} \map f {t - a} & : t > a \\ 0 & : t \le a \end {cases}$ Then: :$\laptrans {\map g t} = e^{-a s} \map F s$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \laptrans {\map g t} | r = \int_0^\infty e^{-s t} \map g t \rd t | c = {{Defof|Laplace Transform}} }} {{eqn | r = \int_0^a e^{-s t} \map g t \rd t + \int_a^\infty e^{-s t} \map g t \rd t | c = }} {{eqn | r = \int_0^a 0 \times e^{-s t} \rd t + \int_a^\infty e^{-s t} \map f {t...
Second Translation Property of Laplace Transforms/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Second_Translation_Property_of_Laplace_Transforms
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Second_Translation_Property_of_Laplace_Transforms/Proof_2
[ "Second Translation Property of Laplace Transforms", "Properties of Laplace Transforms", "Laplace Transforms", "Exponential Function" ]
[ "Definition:Function" ]
[ "Integration by Substitution" ]
proofwiki-10639
Seifert-van Kampen Theorem
The functor $\pi_1 : \mathbf{Top_\bullet} \to \mathbf{Grp}$ preserves pushouts of inclusions.
Let $\struct {X, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $U_1, U_2 \in \tau$ such that: : $U_1 \cup U_2 = X$ : $U_1 \cap U_2 \ne \O$ is connected Let $\ast \in U_1 \cap U_2$. Let: : $i_k : U_1 \cap U_2 \hookrightarrow U_k$ : $j_k : U_k \hookrightarrow U_1 \cup U_2$ be inclusions. For simplicity, let: :$\map {\pi_1} X = \map...
The functor $\pi_1 : \mathbf{Top_\bullet} \to \mathbf{Grp}$ preserves pushouts of inclusions.
Let $\struct {X, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $U_1, U_2 \in \tau$ such that: : $U_1 \cup U_2 = X$ : $U_1 \cap U_2 \ne \O$ is connected Let $\ast \in U_1 \cap U_2$. Let: : $i_k : U_1 \cap U_2 \hookrightarrow U_k$ : $j_k : U_k \hookrightarrow U_1 \cup U_2$ be inclusions. For sim...
Seifert-van Kampen Theorem
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Seifert-van_Kampen_Theorem
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Seifert-van_Kampen_Theorem
[ "Category Theory" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Amalgamated Free Product", "Category:Category Theory" ]
proofwiki-10640
Functions of Independent Random Variables are Independent
Let $X$ and $Y$ be independent random variables on a probability space $\struct {\Omega, \Sigma, \Pr}$. Let $g$ and $h$ be real-valued functions defined on the codomains of $X$ and $Y$ respectively. Then $\map g X$ and $\map h Y$ are independent random variables.
Let $A$ and $B$ be subsets of the real numbers $\R$. Let $g^{-1} \sqbrk A$ and $h^{-1} \sqbrk B$ denote the preimages of $A$ and $B$ under $g$ and $h$ respectively. Applying the definition of independent random variables: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \Pr {\map g X \in A, \map h Y \in B} | r = \map \Pr {X \in g...
Let $X$ and $Y$ be [[Definition:Independent Random Variables|independent random variables]] on a [[Definition:Probability Space|probability space]] $\struct {\Omega, \Sigma, \Pr}$. Let $g$ and $h$ be [[Definition:Real-Valued Function|real-valued functions]] defined on the [[Definition:Codomain of Mapping|codomains]] o...
Let $A$ and $B$ be [[Definition:Subset|subsets]] of the [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]] $\R$. Let $g^{-1} \sqbrk A$ and $h^{-1} \sqbrk B$ denote the [[Definition:Preimage of Subset under Mapping|preimages]] of $A$ and $B$ under $g$ and $h$ respectively. Applying the definition of [[Definition:Independent Ran...
Functions of Independent Random Variables are Independent
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Functions_of_Independent_Random_Variables_are_Independent
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Functions_of_Independent_Random_Variables_are_Independent
[ "Independent Random Variables" ]
[ "Definition:Independent Random Variables", "Definition:Probability Space", "Definition:Real-Valued Function", "Definition:Codomain (Set Theory)/Mapping", "Definition:Independent Random Variables" ]
[ "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Preimage/Mapping/Subset", "Definition:Independent Random Variables", "Definition:Independent Random Variables" ]
proofwiki-10641
Multiplication Property of Characteristic Functions
Let $X$ and $Y$ be independent random variables on a probability space $\struct {\Omega, \Sigma, \Pr}$. Let $\phi_X$ and $\phi_Y$ denote the characteristic functions of $X$ and $Y$ respectively. Then: :$\phi_{X + Y} = \phi_X \phi_Y$
Let $i = \sqrt{-1}$. Let $\expect X$ denote the expectation of $X$. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\phi_{X + Y} } t | r = \expect {e^{i t \paren {X + Y} } } | c = {{Defof|Characteristic Function of Random Variable}} }} {{eqn | r = \expect {e^{i t X} e^{i t Y} } | c = }} {{eqn | r = \expect {e^{i t X...
Let $X$ and $Y$ be [[Definition:Independent Random Variables|independent random variables]] on a [[Definition:Probability Space|probability space]] $\struct {\Omega, \Sigma, \Pr}$. Let $\phi_X$ and $\phi_Y$ denote the [[Definition:Characteristic Function of Random Variable|characteristic functions]] of $X$ and $Y$ res...
Let $i = \sqrt{-1}$. Let $\expect X$ denote the [[Definition:Expectation|expectation]] of $X$. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\phi_{X + Y} } t | r = \expect {e^{i t \paren {X + Y} } } | c = {{Defof|Characteristic Function of Random Variable}} }} {{eqn | r = \expect {e^{i t X} e^{i t Y} } | c = }} ...
Multiplication Property of Characteristic Functions
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Multiplication_Property_of_Characteristic_Functions
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Multiplication_Property_of_Characteristic_Functions
[ "Probability Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Independent Random Variables", "Definition:Probability Space", "Definition:Characteristic Function of Random Variable" ]
[ "Definition:Expectation", "Functions of Independent Random Variables are Independent", "Expected Value of Product is Product of Expected Value" ]
proofwiki-10642
Relationship between Limit Inferior and Lower Limit
Let $\struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $f: S \to \R \cup \set {-\infty, \infty}$ be an extended real-valued function. Let $\sequence {s_n}_{n \mathop \in \N}$ be a convergent sequence in $S$ such that $s_n \to \bar s$. Then the lower limit of $f$ at $\bar s$ is bounded above by the limit inferior of $\sequ...
Let $\NN_{\bar s}$ denote the neighborhood filter of $\bar s$. By definition of the lower limit, there exists a sequence of open neighborhoods $\sequence {V_k}_{k \mathop \in \N} \in \NN_{\bar s}$ such that: :$\ds \lim_{k \mathop \to \infty} \set {\inf_{s \mathop \in V_k} \map f s} = \liminf_{s \mathop \to \bar s} \map...
Let $\struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $f: S \to \R \cup \set {-\infty, \infty}$ be an [[Definition:Extended Real-Valued Function|extended real-valued function]]. Let $\sequence {s_n}_{n \mathop \in \N}$ be a [[Definition:Convergent Sequence|convergent sequence]] in $S$ s...
Let $\NN_{\bar s}$ denote the [[Definition:Neighborhood Filter|neighborhood filter]] of $\bar s$. By definition of the [[Definition:Lower Limit (Topological Space)|lower limit]], there exists a [[Definition:Sequence|sequence]] of [[Definition:Neighborhood (Topology)|open neighborhoods]] $\sequence {V_k}_{k \mathop \in...
Relationship between Limit Inferior and Lower Limit
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Relationship_between_Limit_Inferior_and_Lower_Limit
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Relationship_between_Limit_Inferior_and_Lower_Limit
[ "Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Extended Real-Valued Function", "Definition:Convergent Sequence", "Definition:Lower Limit (Topological Space)", "Definition:Bounded Above Mapping/Real-Valued", "Definition:Limit Inferior" ]
[ "Definition:Neighborhood Filter", "Definition:Lower Limit (Topological Space)", "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Neighborhood (Topology)", "Category:Topology" ]
proofwiki-10643
Group is Abelian iff Opposite Group is Itself
Let $\struct {G, \circ}$ be a group. Let $\struct {G, *}$ be the opposite group to $\struct {G, \circ}$. $\struct {G, \circ}$ is an Abelian group {{iff}}: :$\struct {G, \circ} = \struct {G, *}$
By definition of opposite group: :$(1): \quad \forall a, b \in G : a \circ b = b * a$
Let $\struct {G, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Group| group]]. Let $\struct {G, *}$ be the [[Definition:Opposite Group|opposite group]] to $\struct {G, \circ}$. $\struct {G, \circ}$ is an [[Definition: Abelian Group|Abelian group]] {{iff}}: :$\struct {G, \circ} = \struct {G, *}$
By definition of [[Definition:Opposite Group|opposite group]]: :$(1): \quad \forall a, b \in G : a \circ b = b * a$
Group is Abelian iff Opposite Group is Itself
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Group_is_Abelian_iff_Opposite_Group_is_Itself
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Group_is_Abelian_iff_Opposite_Group_is_Itself
[ "Abelian Groups", "Opposite Groups" ]
[ "Definition:Group", "Definition:Opposite Group", "Definition: Abelian Group" ]
[ "Definition:Opposite Group" ]
proofwiki-10644
Sequence on Product Space Converges to Point iff Projections Converge to Projections of Point
Let $I$ be an arbitrary index set. For all $i \in I$, let $T_i = \struct {X_i, \tau_i}$ be topological spaces. Let $\ds X = \prod_{i \mathop \in I} X_i$ be the cartesian product of $\family {X_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$. Let $\tau$ be the product topology on $X$. Denote by $\pr_i : X \to X_i$ the projection from $X$ onto $X...
=== Necessary Condition === Let $x_n \to x$. Let $i \in I$. From Projection from Product Topology is Continuous it follows that $\pr_i$ is continuous. By Continuous Mapping is Sequentially Continuous, $\pr_i$ is also sequentially continuous. Hence $\map {\pr_i} {x_n} \to \map {\pr_i} x$. {{qed|lemma}}
Let $I$ be an arbitrary [[Definition:Indexing Set|index set]]. For all $i \in I$, let $T_i = \struct {X_i, \tau_i}$ be [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]]. Let $\ds X = \prod_{i \mathop \in I} X_i$ be the [[Definition:Cartesian Product|cartesian product]] of $\family {X_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$. Let $\t...
=== Necessary Condition === Let $x_n \to x$. Let $i \in I$. From [[Projection from Product Topology is Continuous]] it follows that $\pr_i$ is continuous. By [[Continuous Mapping is Sequentially Continuous]], $\pr_i$ is also [[Definition:Sequential Continuity|sequentially continuous]]. Hence $\map {\pr_i} {x_n} \t...
Sequence on Product Space Converges to Point iff Projections Converge to Projections of Point
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sequence_on_Product_Space_Converges_to_Point_iff_Projections_Converge_to_Projections_of_Point
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sequence_on_Product_Space_Converges_to_Point_iff_Projections_Converge_to_Projections_of_Point
[ "Topology", "Convergence", "Sequences", "Projections" ]
[ "Definition:Indexing Set", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Cartesian Product", "Definition:Product Topology", "Definition:Projection (Mapping Theory)", "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Convergent Sequence/Topology", "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Convergent Sequence/Topology" ]
[ "Projection from Product Topology is Continuous", "Continuous Mapping is Sequentially Continuous", "Definition:Sequential Continuity" ]
proofwiki-10645
Cauchy's Convergence Criterion/Complex Numbers
Let $\sequence {z_n}$ be a complex sequence. Then $\sequence {z_n}$ is a Cauchy sequence {{iff}} it is convergent.
=== Lemma === {{:Cauchy's Convergence Criterion/Complex Numbers/Lemma 1}}{{qed|lemma}} Let $\sequence {x_n}$ be a real sequence where: :$x_n = \map \Re {z_n}$ for every $n$ :$\map \Re {z_n}$ is the real part of $z_n$ Let $\sequence {y_n}$ be a real sequence where: :$y_n = \map \Im {z_n}$ for every $n$ :$\map \Im {z_n}$...
Let $\sequence {z_n}$ be a [[Definition:Complex Sequence|complex sequence]]. Then $\sequence {z_n}$ is a [[Definition:Cauchy Sequence|Cauchy sequence]] {{iff}} it is [[Definition:Convergent Complex Sequence|convergent]].
=== [[Cauchy's Convergence Criterion/Complex Numbers/Lemma 1|Lemma]] === {{:Cauchy's Convergence Criterion/Complex Numbers/Lemma 1}}{{qed|lemma}} Let $\sequence {x_n}$ be a [[Definition:Real Sequence|real sequence]] where: :$x_n = \map \Re {z_n}$ for every $n$ :$\map \Re {z_n}$ is the [[Definition:Real Part|real part...
Cauchy's Convergence Criterion/Complex Numbers/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cauchy's_Convergence_Criterion/Complex_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cauchy's_Convergence_Criterion/Complex_Numbers/Proof_1
[ "Convergent Complex Sequences", "Cauchy Sequences", "Cauchy's Convergence Criterion" ]
[ "Definition:Complex Sequence", "Definition:Cauchy Sequence", "Definition:Convergent Sequence/Complex Numbers" ]
[ "Cauchy's Convergence Criterion/Complex Numbers/Lemma 1", "Definition:Real Sequence", "Definition:Complex Number/Real Part", "Definition:Real Sequence", "Definition:Complex Number/Imaginary Part", "Definition:Cauchy Sequence", "Definition:Convergent Sequence/Complex Numbers", "Definition:Cauchy Sequen...
proofwiki-10646
Cauchy's Convergence Criterion/Complex Numbers
Let $\sequence {z_n}$ be a complex sequence. Then $\sequence {z_n}$ is a Cauchy sequence {{iff}} it is convergent.
=== Lemma === {{:Cauchy's Convergence Criterion/Complex Numbers/Lemma 1}}{{qed|lemma}} Let $\sequence {x_n}$ be a real sequence where: :$x_n = \map \Re {z_n}$ for every $n$ :$\map \Re {z_n}$ is the real part of $z_n$ Let $\sequence {y_n}$ be a real sequence where :$y_n = \map \Im {z_n}$ for every $n$ :$\map \Im {z_n}$ ...
Let $\sequence {z_n}$ be a [[Definition:Complex Sequence|complex sequence]]. Then $\sequence {z_n}$ is a [[Definition:Cauchy Sequence|Cauchy sequence]] {{iff}} it is [[Definition:Convergent Complex Sequence|convergent]].
=== [[Cauchy's Convergence Criterion/Complex Numbers/Lemma 1|Lemma]] === {{:Cauchy's Convergence Criterion/Complex Numbers/Lemma 1}}{{qed|lemma}} Let $\sequence {x_n}$ be a [[Definition:Real Sequence|real sequence]] where: :$x_n = \map \Re {z_n}$ for every $n$ :$\map \Re {z_n}$ is the [[Definition:Real Part|real part...
Cauchy's Convergence Criterion/Complex Numbers/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cauchy's_Convergence_Criterion/Complex_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cauchy's_Convergence_Criterion/Complex_Numbers/Proof_2
[ "Convergent Complex Sequences", "Cauchy Sequences", "Cauchy's Convergence Criterion" ]
[ "Definition:Complex Sequence", "Definition:Cauchy Sequence", "Definition:Convergent Sequence/Complex Numbers" ]
[ "Cauchy's Convergence Criterion/Complex Numbers/Lemma 1", "Definition:Real Sequence", "Definition:Complex Number/Real Part", "Definition:Real Sequence", "Definition:Complex Number/Imaginary Part", "Definition:Cauchy Sequence/Complex Numbers", "Definition:Cauchy Sequence/Real Numbers", "Cauchy's Conver...
proofwiki-10647
Sum of Arctangents
Let $\arctan a + \arctan b \in \openint {-\dfrac \pi 2} {\dfrac \pi 2}$ Then: :$\arctan a + \arctan b = \map \arctan {\dfrac {a + b} {1 - a b} }$ where $\arctan$ denotes the arctangent.
Let $x = \arctan a$ and $y = \arctan b$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | l = \tan x | r = a | c = }} {{eqn | n = 2 | l = \tan y | r = b | c = }} {{eqn | l = \map \tan {\arctan a + \arctan b} | r = \map \tan {x + y} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \frac {\tan x + \tan y} {1 - \...
Let $\arctan a + \arctan b \in \openint {-\dfrac \pi 2} {\dfrac \pi 2}$ Then: :$\arctan a + \arctan b = \map \arctan {\dfrac {a + b} {1 - a b} }$ where $\arctan$ denotes the [[Definition:Real Arctangent|arctangent]].
Let $x = \arctan a$ and $y = \arctan b$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | l = \tan x | r = a | c = }} {{eqn | n = 2 | l = \tan y | r = b | c = }} {{eqn | l = \map \tan {\arctan a + \arctan b} | r = \map \tan {x + y} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \frac {\tan x + \tan y} {1 - ...
Sum of Arctangents/Proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Arctangents
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Arctangents/Proof
[ "Sum of Arctangents", "Arctangent Function" ]
[ "Definition:Inverse Tangent/Real/Arctangent" ]
[ "Tangent of Sum" ]
proofwiki-10648
Sum of Arccotangents
:$\arccot a + \arccot b = \arccot \dfrac {a b - 1} {a + b}$ where $\arccot$ denotes the arccotangent.
Let $x = \arccot a$ and $y = \arccot b$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | l = \cot x | r = a | c = }} {{eqn | n = 2 | l = \cot y | r = b | c = }} {{eqn | l = \map \cot {\arccot a + \arccot b} | r = \map \cot {x + y} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \frac {\cot x \cot y - 1} {\co...
:$\arccot a + \arccot b = \arccot \dfrac {a b - 1} {a + b}$ where $\arccot$ denotes the [[Definition:Arccotangent|arccotangent]].
Let $x = \arccot a$ and $y = \arccot b$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | l = \cot x | r = a | c = }} {{eqn | n = 2 | l = \cot y | r = b | c = }} {{eqn | l = \map \cot {\arccot a + \arccot b} | r = \map \cot {x + y} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \frac {\cot x \cot y - 1} {\c...
Sum of Arccotangents
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Arccotangents
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Arccotangents
[ "Arccotangent Function" ]
[ "Definition:Inverse Cotangent/Real/Arccotangent" ]
[ "Cotangent of Sum" ]
proofwiki-10649
Difference of Arccotangents
:$\arccot a - \arccot b = \arccot \dfrac {a b + 1} {a - b}$ where $\arccot$ denotes the arccotangent.
Let $x = \arccot a$ and $y = \arccot b$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | l = \cot x | r = a | c = }} {{eqn | n = 2 | l = \cot y | r = b | c = }} {{eqn | l = \map \cot {\arccot a - \arccot b} | r = \map \cot {x - y} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \frac {\cot x \cot y + 1} {\co...
:$\arccot a - \arccot b = \arccot \dfrac {a b + 1} {a - b}$ where $\arccot$ denotes the [[Definition:Arccotangent|arccotangent]].
Let $x = \arccot a$ and $y = \arccot b$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | l = \cot x | r = a | c = }} {{eqn | n = 2 | l = \cot y | r = b | c = }} {{eqn | l = \map \cot {\arccot a - \arccot b} | r = \map \cot {x - y} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \frac {\cot x \cot y + 1} {\c...
Difference of Arccotangents
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Difference_of_Arccotangents
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Difference_of_Arccotangents
[ "Arccotangent Function" ]
[ "Definition:Inverse Cotangent/Real/Arccotangent" ]
[ "Cotangent of Difference" ]
proofwiki-10650
Multiple Angle Formula for Tangent
:$\ds \map \tan {n \theta} = \frac {\ds \sum_{i \mathop = 0}^{\floor{\frac {n - 1} 2} } \paren {-1}^i \binom n {2 i + 1} \tan^{2 i + 1}\theta} {\ds \sum_{i \mathop = 0}^{\floor {\frac n 2} } \paren {-1}^i \binom n {2 i} \tan^{2 i}\theta}$
Proof by induction: For all $n \in \N_{\ge 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the proposition: :$\ds \map \tan {n \theta} = \frac {\ds \sum_{i \mathop = 0}^{\floor{\frac {n - 1} 2} } \paren {-1}^i \binom n {2 i + 1} \tan^{2 i + 1}\theta} {\ds \sum_{i \mathop = 0}^{\floor {\frac n 2} } \paren {-1}^i \binom n {2 i} \tan^{2 i}\theta}...
:$\ds \map \tan {n \theta} = \frac {\ds \sum_{i \mathop = 0}^{\floor{\frac {n - 1} 2} } \paren {-1}^i \binom n {2 i + 1} \tan^{2 i + 1}\theta} {\ds \sum_{i \mathop = 0}^{\floor {\frac n 2} } \paren {-1}^i \binom n {2 i} \tan^{2 i}\theta}$
Proof by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]]: For all $n \in \N_{\ge 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :$\ds \map \tan {n \theta} = \frac {\ds \sum_{i \mathop = 0}^{\floor{\frac {n - 1} 2} } \paren {-1}^i \binom n {2 i + 1} \tan^{2 i + 1}\theta} {\ds \sum_{i \mathop = 0}^...
Multiple Angle Formula for Tangent
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Multiple_Angle_Formula_for_Tangent
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Multiple_Angle_Formula_for_Tangent
[ "Tangent Function" ]
[]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Proposition", "Principle of Mathematical Induction" ]
proofwiki-10651
Laplace Transform of Dirac Delta Function by Function
Let $\map f t: \R \to \R$ or $\R \to \C$ be a function. Let $\map \delta t$ denote the Dirac delta function. Let $c$ be a positive constant real number. Let $\laptrans {\map f t} = \map F s$ denote the Laplace transform of $f$. Then: :$\laptrans {\map \delta {t - c} \map f t} = e^{- s c} \map f c$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \laptrans {\map \delta {t - c} \map f t} | r = \int^{\to+\infty}_0 e^{-s t} \map \delta {t - c} \map f t \rd t | c = {{Defof|Laplace Transform}} }} {{eqn | r = \int^{c^+}_{c^-} e^{-s t} \map \delta {t - c} \map f t \rd t | c = Integrand elsewhere zero by {{Defof|Dirac Delta F...
Let $\map f t: \R \to \R$ or $\R \to \C$ be a [[Definition:Function|function]]. Let $\map \delta t$ denote the [[Definition:Dirac Delta Function|Dirac delta function]]. Let $c$ be a [[Definition:Positive Real Number|positive]] [[Definition:Constant|constant]] [[Definition:Real Number|real number]]. Let $\laptrans {\...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \laptrans {\map \delta {t - c} \map f t} | r = \int^{\to+\infty}_0 e^{-s t} \map \delta {t - c} \map f t \rd t | c = {{Defof|Laplace Transform}} }} {{eqn | r = \int^{c^+}_{c^-} e^{-s t} \map \delta {t - c} \map f t \rd t | c = Integrand elsewhere zero by {{Defof|Dirac Delta F...
Laplace Transform of Dirac Delta Function by Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Laplace_Transform_of_Dirac_Delta_Function_by_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Laplace_Transform_of_Dirac_Delta_Function_by_Function
[ "Dirac Delta Function", "Examples of Laplace Transforms" ]
[ "Definition:Function", "Definition:Dirac Delta Function", "Definition:Positive/Real Number", "Definition:Constant", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Laplace Transform" ]
[ "Definition:Real Interval/Closed", "Primitive of Constant Multiple of Function", "Integration by Substitution", "Category:Dirac Delta Function", "Category:Examples of Laplace Transforms" ]
proofwiki-10652
Modulus of Complex Number equals its Distance from Origin
The modulus of a complex number equals its distance from the origin on the complex plane.
Let $z = x + y i$ be a complex number and $O = 0 + 0 i$ be the origin on the complex plane. We have its modulus: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \cmod z | r = \cmod {x + y i} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sqrt {x^2 + y^2} | c = {{Defof|Complex Modulus}} }} {{end-eqn}} and its distance from the origin on the complex...
The [[Definition:Complex Modulus|modulus]] of a [[Definition:Complex Number|complex number]] equals its [[Definition:Distance|distance]] from the [[Definition:Origin|origin]] on the [[Definition:Complex Plane|complex plane]].
Let $z = x + y i$ be a [[Definition:Complex Number|complex number]] and $O = 0 + 0 i$ be the [[Definition:Origin|origin]] on the [[Definition:Complex Plane|complex plane]]. We have its [[Definition:Complex Modulus|modulus]]: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \cmod z | r = \cmod {x + y i} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sq...
Modulus of Complex Number equals its Distance from Origin
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Modulus_of_Complex_Number_equals_its_Distance_from_Origin
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Modulus_of_Complex_Number_equals_its_Distance_from_Origin
[ "Complex Analysis" ]
[ "Definition:Complex Modulus", "Definition:Complex Number", "Definition:Distance", "Definition:Coordinate System/Origin", "Definition:Complex Number/Complex Plane" ]
[ "Definition:Complex Number", "Definition:Coordinate System/Origin", "Definition:Complex Number/Complex Plane", "Definition:Complex Modulus", "Definition:Distance", "Definition:Coordinate System/Origin", "Definition:Complex Number/Complex Plane", "Distance Formula", "Category:Complex Analysis" ]
proofwiki-10653
Empty Set is Countable
The empty set $\O$ is countable.
By Peano's Axioms, $\N_0 \sim \O$, where $\N_n$ denotes the initial segment of natural number $n$. By definition, $\O$ is finite. By definition, $\O$ is a countable set. {{qed}} Category:Set Theory Category:Empty Set Category:Countable Sets ly0tg8512aadn5cgyxnqkjdd9niomfe
The [[Definition:Empty Set|empty set]] $\O$ is [[Definition:Countable Set|countable]].
By [[Axiom:Peano's Axioms|Peano's Axioms]], $\N_0 \sim \O$, where $\N_n$ denotes the [[Definition:Initial Segment of Natural Numbers|initial segment of natural number $n$]]. By definition, $\O$ is [[Definition:Finite Set|finite]]. By definition, $\O$ is a [[Definition:Countable Set/Definition 2|countable set]]. {{qed...
Empty Set is Countable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Empty_Set_is_Countable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Empty_Set_is_Countable
[ "Set Theory", "Empty Set", "Countable Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Empty Set", "Definition:Countable Set" ]
[ "Axiom:Peano's Axioms", "Definition:Initial Segment of Natural Numbers", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Countable Set/Definition 2", "Category:Set Theory", "Category:Empty Set", "Category:Countable Sets" ]
proofwiki-10654
Lindelöf's Lemma
Let $C$ be a set of open real sets. Let $S \subseteq \R$ be a subset of the real numbers that is covered by $C$. Then there exists a countable subset of $C$ that covers $S$.
=== Lemma $1$ === {{:Lindelöf's Lemma/Lemma 1}}{{qed|lemma}} We have that $S$ is covered by $C$. This means that $S$ is a subset of $\ds \bigcup_{O \mathop \in C} O$. From {{Lemma|Lindelöf's Lemma|1}}: :$\ds \bigcup_{O \mathop \in D} O = \bigcup_{O \mathop \in C} O$ where $D$ is a countable subset of $C$. Hence $S$ is ...
Let $C$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Open Set of Real Numbers|open real sets]]. Let $S \subseteq \R$ be a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of the [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]] that is [[Definition:Cover of Set|covered]] by $C$. Then there exists a [[Definition:Countable Set|countable]] [[Definit...
=== [[Lindelöf's Lemma/Lemma 1|Lemma $1$]] === {{:Lindelöf's Lemma/Lemma 1}}{{qed|lemma}} We have that $S$ is [[Definition:Cover of Set|covered]] by $C$. This means that $S$ is a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $\ds \bigcup_{O \mathop \in C} O$. From {{Lemma|Lindelöf's Lemma|1}}: :$\ds \bigcup_{O \mathop \in D} O =...
Lindelöf's Lemma
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Lindelöf's_Lemma
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Lindelöf's_Lemma
[ "Lindelöf's Lemma", "Real Analysis" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Open Set/Real Analysis/Real Numbers", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Cover of Set", "Definition:Countable Set", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Cover of Set" ]
[ "Lindelöf's Lemma/Lemma 1", "Definition:Cover of Set", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Countable Set", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Cover of Set", "Definition:Cover of Set", "Definition:Countable Set", "Definition:Subset", "Category:Lindelöf's Lemma", "Category:Real A...
proofwiki-10655
Area of Isosceles Triangle in terms of Sides
Let $\triangle ABC$ be an isosceles triangle whose apex is $A$. Let $r$ be the length of a leg of $\triangle ABC$. Let $b$ be the length of the base of $\triangle ABC$. Then the area $\AA$ of $\triangle ABC$ is given by: :$\AA = \dfrac b 4 \sqrt {4 r^2 - b^2}$
:300px Let $h$ be the height of $\triangle ABC$. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \AA | r = \frac 1 2 b h | c = Area of Triangle in Terms of Side and Altitude }} {{eqn | r = \frac b 2 \sqrt {r^2 - \paren {\frac b 2}^2} | c = Pythagoras's Theorem }} {{eqn | r = \frac b 2 \sqrt {\frac {4 r^2 - b^2} 4} | ...
Let $\triangle ABC$ be an [[Definition:Isosceles Triangle|isosceles triangle]] whose [[Definition:Apex of Isosceles Triangle|apex]] is $A$. Let $r$ be the [[Definition:Length (Linear Measure)|length]] of a [[Definition:Legs of Isosceles Triangle|leg]] of $\triangle ABC$. Let $b$ be the [[Definition:Length (Linear Mea...
:[[File:IsoscelesTriangleArea.png|300px]] Let $h$ be the [[Definition:Height of Triangle|height]] of $\triangle ABC$. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \AA | r = \frac 1 2 b h | c = [[Area of Triangle in Terms of Side and Altitude]] }} {{eqn | r = \frac b 2 \sqrt {r^2 - \paren {\frac b 2}^2} | c = [[Pythag...
Area of Isosceles Triangle in terms of Sides
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Area_of_Isosceles_Triangle_in_terms_of_Sides
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Area_of_Isosceles_Triangle_in_terms_of_Sides
[ "Areas of Triangles", "Isosceles Triangles" ]
[ "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)/Isosceles", "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)/Isosceles/Apex", "Definition:Linear Measure/Length", "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)/Isosceles/Legs", "Definition:Linear Measure/Length", "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)/Isosceles/Base", "Definition:Area" ]
[ "File:IsoscelesTriangleArea.png", "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)/Height", "Area of Triangle in Terms of Side and Altitude", "Pythagoras's Theorem", "Category:Areas of Triangles", "Category:Isosceles Triangles" ]
proofwiki-10656
Even Function Times Even Function is Even
Let $X \subset \R$ be a symmetric set of real numbers: :$\forall x \in X: -x \in X$ Let $f, g: X \to \R$ be two even functions. Let $f \cdot g$ denote the pointwise product of $f$ and $g$. Then $\paren {f \cdot g}: X \to \R$ is also an even function.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\paren {f \cdot g} } {-x} | r = \map f {-x} \cdot \map g {-x} | c = {{Defof|Pointwise Multiplication of Real-Valued Functions}} }} {{eqn | r = \map f x \cdot \map g x | c = {{Defof|Even Function}} }} {{eqn | r = \map {\paren {f \cdot g} } x | c = {{Defof|Pointwise...
Let $X \subset \R$ be a [[Definition:Symmetric Set of Real Numbers|symmetric set of real numbers]]: :$\forall x \in X: -x \in X$ Let $f, g: X \to \R$ be two [[Definition:Even Function|even functions]]. Let $f \cdot g$ denote the [[Definition:Pointwise Multiplication of Real-Valued Functions|pointwise product]] of $f$...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\paren {f \cdot g} } {-x} | r = \map f {-x} \cdot \map g {-x} | c = {{Defof|Pointwise Multiplication of Real-Valued Functions}} }} {{eqn | r = \map f x \cdot \map g x | c = {{Defof|Even Function}} }} {{eqn | r = \map {\paren {f \cdot g} } x | c = {{Defof|Pointwise...
Even Function Times Even Function is Even
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Even_Function_Times_Even_Function_is_Even
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Even_Function_Times_Even_Function_is_Even
[ "Even Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Symmetric Set/Real Numbers", "Definition:Even Function", "Definition:Pointwise Multiplication of Real-Valued Functions", "Definition:Even Function" ]
[ "Definition:Even Function" ]
proofwiki-10657
Odd Function Times Even Function is Odd
Let $X \subset \R$ be a symmetric set of real numbers: :$\forall x \in X: -x \in X$ Let $f: X \to \R$ be an odd function. Let $g: X \to \R$ be an even function. Let $f \cdot g$ denote the pointwise product of $f$ and $g$. Then $\paren {f \cdot g}: X \to \R$ is an odd function.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\paren {f \cdot g} } {-x} | r = \map f {-x} \cdot \map g {-x} | c = {{Defof|Pointwise Multiplication of Real-Valued Functions}} }} {{eqn | r = \paren {-\map f x} \cdot \map g x | c = {{Defof|Odd Function}} and {{Defof|Even Function}} }} {{eqn | r = -\map f x \cdot \map ...
Let $X \subset \R$ be a [[Definition:Symmetric Set of Real Numbers|symmetric set of real numbers]]: :$\forall x \in X: -x \in X$ Let $f: X \to \R$ be an [[Definition:Odd Function|odd function]]. Let $g: X \to \R$ be an [[Definition:Even Function|even function]]. Let $f \cdot g$ denote the [[Definition:Pointwise Mult...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\paren {f \cdot g} } {-x} | r = \map f {-x} \cdot \map g {-x} | c = {{Defof|Pointwise Multiplication of Real-Valued Functions}} }} {{eqn | r = \paren {-\map f x} \cdot \map g x | c = {{Defof|Odd Function}} and {{Defof|Even Function}} }} {{eqn | r = -\map f x \cdot \map ...
Odd Function Times Even Function is Odd
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Odd_Function_Times_Even_Function_is_Odd
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Odd_Function_Times_Even_Function_is_Odd
[ "Even Functions", "Odd Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Symmetric Set/Real Numbers", "Definition:Odd Function", "Definition:Even Function", "Definition:Pointwise Multiplication of Real-Valued Functions", "Definition:Odd Function" ]
[ "Definition:Odd Function" ]
proofwiki-10658
Odd Function Times Odd Function is Even
Let $S \subset \R$ be a symmetric set of real numbers: :$\forall x \in S: -x \in X$ Let $f, g: X \to \R$ be two odd functions. Let $f \cdot g$ denote the pointwise product of $f$ and $g$. Then $\paren {f \cdot g}: S \to \R$ is an even function.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\paren {f \cdot g} } {-x} | r = \map f {-x} \cdot \map g {-x} | c = {{Defof|Pointwise Multiplication of Real-Valued Functions}} }} {{eqn | r = \paren {-\map f x} \cdot \paren {-\map g x} | c = {{Defof|Odd Function}} }} {{eqn | r = \map f x \cdot \map g x | c = }}...
Let $S \subset \R$ be a [[Definition:Symmetric Set of Real Numbers|symmetric set of real numbers]]: :$\forall x \in S: -x \in X$ Let $f, g: X \to \R$ be two [[Definition:Odd Function|odd functions]]. Let $f \cdot g$ denote the [[Definition:Pointwise Multiplication of Real-Valued Functions|pointwise product]] of $f$ a...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\paren {f \cdot g} } {-x} | r = \map f {-x} \cdot \map g {-x} | c = {{Defof|Pointwise Multiplication of Real-Valued Functions}} }} {{eqn | r = \paren {-\map f x} \cdot \paren {-\map g x} | c = {{Defof|Odd Function}} }} {{eqn | r = \map f x \cdot \map g x | c = }}...
Odd Function Times Odd Function is Even
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Odd_Function_Times_Odd_Function_is_Even
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Odd_Function_Times_Odd_Function_is_Even
[ "Even Functions", "Odd Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Symmetric Set/Real Numbers", "Definition:Odd Function", "Definition:Pointwise Multiplication of Real-Valued Functions", "Definition:Even Function" ]
[ "Definition:Even Function" ]
proofwiki-10659
Mellin Transform of Exponential
Let $a$ be a complex constant and $e^t$ be the complex exponential. Let $\MM$ be the Mellin transform. Then: :$\map {\MM \set {e^{-a t} } } s = a^{-s} \, \map \Gamma s$ where $\map \Re a, \map \Re s > 0$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\MM \set {e^{-a t} } } s | r = \int_0^{\to +\infty} t^{s - 1} e^{-a t} \rd t | c = {{Defof|Mellin Transform}} }} {{eqn | r = \int_0^{\to +\infty} \paren {\dfrac t a}^{s - 1} e^{-a \paren {\frac t a} } \frac {\d t} a | c = Integration by Substitution, $t \mapsto \dfrac t...
Let $a$ be a [[Definition:Complex Number|complex]] [[Definition:Constant|constant]] and $e^t$ be the [[Definition:Complex Exponential Function|complex exponential]]. Let $\MM$ be the [[Definition:Mellin Transform|Mellin transform]]. Then: :$\map {\MM \set {e^{-a t} } } s = a^{-s} \, \map \Gamma s$ where $\map \Re a...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\MM \set {e^{-a t} } } s | r = \int_0^{\to +\infty} t^{s - 1} e^{-a t} \rd t | c = {{Defof|Mellin Transform}} }} {{eqn | r = \int_0^{\to +\infty} \paren {\dfrac t a}^{s - 1} e^{-a \paren {\frac t a} } \frac {\d t} a | c = [[Integration by Substitution]], $t \mapsto \dfr...
Mellin Transform of Exponential
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Mellin_Transform_of_Exponential
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Mellin_Transform_of_Exponential
[ "Mellin Transforms" ]
[ "Definition:Complex Number", "Definition:Constant", "Definition:Exponential Function/Complex", "Definition:Mellin Transform" ]
[ "Integration by Substitution", "Primitive of Constant Multiple of Function" ]
proofwiki-10660
Mellin Transform of Dirac Delta Function
Let $c \in \R_{>0}$ be a (strictly) positive real number. Let $\map {\delta_c} t$ be the Dirac delta function. Let $\MM$ be the Mellin transform. Then: :$\map {\MM \set {\map {\delta_c} t} } s = c^{s - 1}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\MM \set {\map {\delta_c} t} } s | r = \int_0^{\to +\infty} t^{s - 1} \map {\delta_c} t \rd t | c = {{Defof|Mellin Transform}} }} {{eqn | r = \int_{c^-}^{c^+} t^{s - 1} \map {\delta_c} t \rd t | c = {{Defof|Dirac Delta Function}}: integrand is elsewhere zero }} {{eqn | ...
Let $c \in \R_{>0}$ be a [[Definition:Strictly Positive Real Number|(strictly) positive real number]]. Let $\map {\delta_c} t$ be the [[Definition:Dirac Delta Function|Dirac delta function]]. Let $\MM$ be the [[Definition:Mellin Transform|Mellin transform]]. Then: :$\map {\MM \set {\map {\delta_c} t} } s = c^{s - 1...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\MM \set {\map {\delta_c} t} } s | r = \int_0^{\to +\infty} t^{s - 1} \map {\delta_c} t \rd t | c = {{Defof|Mellin Transform}} }} {{eqn | r = \int_{c^-}^{c^+} t^{s - 1} \map {\delta_c} t \rd t | c = {{Defof|Dirac Delta Function}}: [[Definition:Integrand|integrand]] is e...
Mellin Transform of Dirac Delta Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Mellin_Transform_of_Dirac_Delta_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Mellin_Transform_of_Dirac_Delta_Function
[ "Mellin Transforms", "Dirac Delta Function" ]
[ "Definition:Strictly Positive/Real Number", "Definition:Dirac Delta Function", "Definition:Mellin Transform" ]
[ "Definition:Integration/Integrand", "Definition:Constant", "Definition:Interval/Ordered Set/Closed", "Primitive of Constant Multiple of Function" ]
proofwiki-10661
Mellin Transform of Heaviside Step Function
Let $c$ be a constant real number. Let $\map {u_c} t$ be the Heaviside step function. Let $\MM$ be the Mellin transform. Then: :$\map {\MM \set {\map {u_c} t} } s = -\dfrac {c^s} s$ for $c > 0, \map \Re s < 0$.
=== Lemma === {{:Mellin Transform of Heaviside Step Function/Lemma}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\MM \set {\map {u_c} t} } s | r = \int_0^{\to +\infty} t^{s - 1} \map {u_c} t \rd t | c = {{Defof|Mellin Transform}} }} {{eqn | r = \int_c^{\to +\infty} t^{s - 1} \rd t | c = {{Defof|Heaviside Step Fun...
Let $c$ be a [[Definition:Constant|constant]] [[Definition:Real Number|real number]]. Let $\map {u_c} t$ be the [[Definition:Heaviside Step Function|Heaviside step function]]. Let $\MM$ be the [[Definition:Mellin Transform|Mellin transform]]. Then: :$\map {\MM \set {\map {u_c} t} } s = -\dfrac {c^s} s$ for $c > 0, ...
=== [[Mellin Transform of Heaviside Step Function/Lemma|Lemma]] === {{:Mellin Transform of Heaviside Step Function/Lemma}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\MM \set {\map {u_c} t} } s | r = \int_0^{\to +\infty} t^{s - 1} \map {u_c} t \rd t | c = {{Defof|Mellin Transform}} }} {{eqn | r = \int_c^{\to +\infty}...
Mellin Transform of Heaviside Step Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Mellin_Transform_of_Heaviside_Step_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Mellin_Transform_of_Heaviside_Step_Function
[ "Mellin Transforms", "Heaviside Step Function" ]
[ "Definition:Constant", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Heaviside Step Function", "Definition:Mellin Transform" ]
[ "Mellin Transform of Heaviside Step Function/Lemma", "Definition:Integration/Integrand", "Primitive of Power", "Category:Mellin Transforms", "Category:Heaviside Step Function" ]
proofwiki-10662
Mellin Transform of Heaviside Step Function/Corollary
:$\map {\MM \set {\map u {c - t} } } s = \dfrac {c^s} s$ for $c > 0, \map \Re s > 0$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\MM \set {\map u {c - t} } } s | r = \int_0^{\to +\infty} t^{s - 1} \map u {c - t} \rd t | c = {{Defof|Mellin Transform}} }} {{eqn | r = \int_0^c t^{s - 1} \rd t | c = {{Defof|Heaviside Step Function}}: integrand is elsewhere zero }} {{eqn | r = \bigintlimits {\dfrac {...
:$\map {\MM \set {\map u {c - t} } } s = \dfrac {c^s} s$ for $c > 0, \map \Re s > 0$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\MM \set {\map u {c - t} } } s | r = \int_0^{\to +\infty} t^{s - 1} \map u {c - t} \rd t | c = {{Defof|Mellin Transform}} }} {{eqn | r = \int_0^c t^{s - 1} \rd t | c = {{Defof|Heaviside Step Function}}: [[Definition:Integrand|integrand]] is elsewhere zero }} {{eqn | r ...
Mellin Transform of Heaviside Step Function/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Mellin_Transform_of_Heaviside_Step_Function/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Mellin_Transform_of_Heaviside_Step_Function/Corollary
[ "Mellin Transforms", "Heaviside Step Function" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Integration/Integrand", "Primitive of Power", "Category:Mellin Transforms", "Category:Heaviside Step Function" ]
proofwiki-10663
Mellin Transform of Power Times Function
Let $t^n: \R \to \R$ be $t$ to the $n$th power for some $n \in \N_{\ge 0}$. Let $\MM$ be the Mellin transform. Then: :$\map {\MM \set {t^n \map f t} } s = \map {\MM \set {\map f t} } {s + n}$ given that both transforms exist.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\MM \set {t^n \map f t} } s | r = \int_0^{\to +\infty} t^{s - 1} t^n \map f t \rd t | c = {{Defof|Mellin Transform}} }} {{eqn | r = \int_0^{\to +\infty} t^{\paren {s + n} - 1} \map f t \rd t | c = Exponent Combination Laws }} {{eqn | r = \map {\MM \set {\map f t} } {s +...
Let $t^n: \R \to \R$ be [[Definition:Integer Power|$t$ to the $n$th power]] for some $n \in \N_{\ge 0}$. Let $\MM$ be the [[Definition:Mellin Transform|Mellin transform]]. Then: :$\map {\MM \set {t^n \map f t} } s = \map {\MM \set {\map f t} } {s + n}$ given that both transforms exist.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\MM \set {t^n \map f t} } s | r = \int_0^{\to +\infty} t^{s - 1} t^n \map f t \rd t | c = {{Defof|Mellin Transform}} }} {{eqn | r = \int_0^{\to +\infty} t^{\paren {s + n} - 1} \map f t \rd t | c = [[Exponent Combination Laws]] }} {{eqn | r = \map {\MM \set {\map f t} } ...
Mellin Transform of Power Times Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Mellin_Transform_of_Power_Times_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Mellin_Transform_of_Power_Times_Function
[ "Mellin Transforms" ]
[ "Definition:Power (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Mellin Transform" ]
[ "Exponent Combination Laws", "Category:Mellin Transforms" ]
proofwiki-10664
Mellin Transform of Dirac Delta Function by Function
Let $f: \R \to \R$ be a function. Let $c \in \R_{>0}$ be a positive constant real number. Let $\map {\delta_c} t$ be the Dirac delta function. Let $\MM$ be the Mellin transform. Then: :$\map {\MM \set {\map {\delta_c} t \map f t} } s = c^{s - 1} \map f c$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\MM \set {\map {\delta_c} t \map f t} } s | r = \int_0^{\to +\infty} t^{s - 1} \map {\delta_c} t \map f t \rd t | c = {{Defof|Mellin Transform}} }} {{eqn | r = \int_{c^-}^{c^+} t^{s - 1} \map {\delta_c} t \map f t \rd t | c = {{Defof|Dirac Delta Function}}: integrand is...
Let $f: \R \to \R$ be a [[Definition:Function|function]]. Let $c \in \R_{>0}$ be a [[Definition:Positive Real Number|positive]] [[Definition:Constant|constant]] [[Definition:Real Number|real number]]. Let $\map {\delta_c} t$ be the [[Definition:Dirac Delta Function|Dirac delta function]]. Let $\MM$ be the [[Definiti...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\MM \set {\map {\delta_c} t \map f t} } s | r = \int_0^{\to +\infty} t^{s - 1} \map {\delta_c} t \map f t \rd t | c = {{Defof|Mellin Transform}} }} {{eqn | r = \int_{c^-}^{c^+} t^{s - 1} \map {\delta_c} t \map f t \rd t | c = {{Defof|Dirac Delta Function}}: [[Definition...
Mellin Transform of Dirac Delta Function by Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Mellin_Transform_of_Dirac_Delta_Function_by_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Mellin_Transform_of_Dirac_Delta_Function_by_Function
[ "Mellin Transforms", "Dirac Delta Function" ]
[ "Definition:Function", "Definition:Positive/Real Number", "Definition:Constant", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Dirac Delta Function", "Definition:Mellin Transform" ]
[ "Definition:Integration/Integrand", "Definition:Constant", "Definition:Interval/Ordered Set/Closed", "Primitive of Constant Multiple of Function", "Category:Mellin Transforms", "Category:Dirac Delta Function" ]
proofwiki-10665
Unity of Ring is Idempotent
Let $\left({R, +, \circ}\right)$ be a ring with unity whose unity is $1_R$. Then $1_R$ is an idempotent element of $R$ under the ring product $\circ$: :$1_R \circ 1_R = 1_R$
By definition of ring with unity, $\left({R, \circ}\right)$ is a monoid whose identity element is $1_R$. From Identity Element is Idempotent (applied to $1_R$): :$1_R \circ 1_R = 1_R$ which was to be proven. {{qed}} Category:Ring Theory sykxawsy95ekov7hb6d6eq70yxiv8oq
Let $\left({R, +, \circ}\right)$ be a [[Definition:Ring with Unity|ring with unity]] whose [[Definition:Unity of Ring|unity]] is $1_R$. Then $1_R$ is an [[Definition:Idempotent Element|idempotent element]] of $R$ under the [[Definition:Ring Product|ring product]] $\circ$: :$1_R \circ 1_R = 1_R$
By definition of [[Definition:Ring with Unity|ring with unity]], $\left({R, \circ}\right)$ is a [[Definition:Monoid|monoid]] whose [[Definition:Identity Element|identity element]] is $1_R$. From [[Identity Element is Idempotent]] (applied to $1_R$): :$1_R \circ 1_R = 1_R$ which was to be proven. {{qed}} [[Category:R...
Unity of Ring is Idempotent
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Unity_of_Ring_is_Idempotent
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Unity_of_Ring_is_Idempotent
[ "Ring Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Ring with Unity", "Definition:Unity (Abstract Algebra)/Ring", "Definition:Idempotence/Element", "Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)/Product" ]
[ "Definition:Ring with Unity", "Definition:Monoid", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity", "Identity Element is Idempotent", "Category:Ring Theory" ]
proofwiki-10666
Mellin Transform of Higher Order Exponential
Let $a$ be a complex constant. Let $n$ be a natural number. Let $e^t$ be the complex exponential of $t$. Let $\MM$ be the Mellin transform. Then: :$\map {\MM \set {e^{-a t^n} } } s = \dfrac {a^{-s/n} } n \map \Gamma {\dfrac s n}$ where $\map \Gamma z$ is the Gamma function and $\map \Re a$, $\map \Re s > 0$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\MM \set {e^{-a t^n} } } s | r = \int_0^{\to +\infty} t^{s-1} e^{-a t^n} \rd t | c = {{Defof|Mellin Transform}} }} {{eqn | r = \int_0^{\to +\infty} \paren {\dfrac t {\sqrt[n] a} }^{s - 1} e^{-a \paren {\dfrac t {\sqrt[n] {a} } }^n} \dfrac {\d t} {\sqrt[n] a} | c = Integ...
Let $a$ be a [[Definition:Complex Number|complex]] [[Definition:Constant|constant]]. Let $n$ be a [[Definition:Natural Number|natural number]]. Let $e^t$ be the [[Definition:Complex Exponential Function|complex exponential of $t$]]. Let $\MM$ be the [[Definition:Mellin Transform|Mellin transform]]. Then: :$\map {\...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\MM \set {e^{-a t^n} } } s | r = \int_0^{\to +\infty} t^{s-1} e^{-a t^n} \rd t | c = {{Defof|Mellin Transform}} }} {{eqn | r = \int_0^{\to +\infty} \paren {\dfrac t {\sqrt[n] a} }^{s - 1} e^{-a \paren {\dfrac t {\sqrt[n] {a} } }^n} \dfrac {\d t} {\sqrt[n] a} | c = [[Int...
Mellin Transform of Higher Order Exponential
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Mellin_Transform_of_Higher_Order_Exponential
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Mellin_Transform_of_Higher_Order_Exponential
[ "Mellin Transforms" ]
[ "Definition:Complex Number", "Definition:Constant", "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Exponential Function/Complex", "Definition:Mellin Transform", "Definition:Gamma Function" ]
[ "Integration by Substitution", "Primitive of Constant Multiple of Function", "Integration by Substitution", "Primitive of Constant Multiple of Function", "Exponent Combination Laws", "Category:Mellin Transforms" ]
proofwiki-10667
Linear Combination of Mellin Transforms
Let $\MM$ be the Mellin transform. Let $\map f t$, $g \left({t}\right)$ be functions such that $\MM \left\{ {\map f t}\right\} \left({s}\right)$ and $\MM \left\{ {\map f t}\right\} \left({s}\right)$ exist. Let $\lambda \in \C$ be a constant. Then: :$\map {\MM \set {\lambda \map f t + \map g t} } s = \lambda \map {\MM \...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\MM \set {\lambda \map f t + \map g t} } s | r = \int_0^{\to +\infty} t^{s - 1} \paren {\lambda \map f t + \map g t} \rd t | c = {{Defof|Mellin Transform}} }} {{eqn | r = \lambda \int_0^{\to +\infty} t^{s - 1} \map f t \rd t + \int_0^{\to +\infty} t^{s - 1} \map g t \rd t ...
Let $\MM$ be the [[Definition:Mellin Transform|Mellin transform]]. Let $\map f t$, $g \left({t}\right)$ be [[Definition:Function|functions]] such that $\MM \left\{ {\map f t}\right\} \left({s}\right)$ and $\MM \left\{ {\map f t}\right\} \left({s}\right)$ exist. Let $\lambda \in \C$ be a [[Definition:Constant|constant...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\MM \set {\lambda \map f t + \map g t} } s | r = \int_0^{\to +\infty} t^{s - 1} \paren {\lambda \map f t + \map g t} \rd t | c = {{Defof|Mellin Transform}} }} {{eqn | r = \lambda \int_0^{\to +\infty} t^{s - 1} \map f t \rd t + \int_0^{\to +\infty} t^{s - 1} \map g t \rd t ...
Linear Combination of Mellin Transforms
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Linear_Combination_of_Mellin_Transforms
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Linear_Combination_of_Mellin_Transforms
[ "Mellin Transforms" ]
[ "Definition:Mellin Transform", "Definition:Function", "Definition:Constant" ]
[ "Linear Combination of Complex Integrals", "Category:Mellin Transforms" ]
proofwiki-10668
Complex Numbers as External Direct Product
Let $\struct {\C_{\ne 0}, \times}$ be the group of non-zero complex numbers under multiplication. Let $\struct {\R_{> 0}, \times}$ be the group of positive real numbers under multiplication. Let $\struct {K, \times}$ be the circle group. Then: :$\struct {\C_{\ne 0}, \times} \cong \struct {\R_{> 0}, \times} \times \stru...
Let $\phi: \C_{\ne 0} \to \R_{> 0} \times K$ be the mapping: :$\map \phi {r e^{i \theta} } = \paren {r, e^{i \theta} }$ $\forall \tuple {a, b} \in \R_{> 0} \times K:\exists z = a \times b \in \C$ such that: :$\map \phi z = \tuple {a, b}$ by Complex Multiplication is Closed and $\R \subset \C$. So $\phi$ is surjective. ...
Let $\struct {\C_{\ne 0}, \times}$ be the [[Definition:Group|group]] of non-[[Definition:Complex Zero|zero]] [[Definition:Complex Number|complex numbers]] under [[Definition:Complex Multiplication|multiplication]]. Let $\struct {\R_{> 0}, \times}$ be the [[Definition:Group|group]] of [[Definition:Positive Real Number|...
Let $\phi: \C_{\ne 0} \to \R_{> 0} \times K$ be the [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]: :$\map \phi {r e^{i \theta} } = \paren {r, e^{i \theta} }$ $\forall \tuple {a, b} \in \R_{> 0} \times K:\exists z = a \times b \in \C$ such that: :$\map \phi z = \tuple {a, b}$ by [[Complex Multiplication is Closed]] and $\R \subset \...
Complex Numbers as External Direct Product
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Complex_Numbers_as_External_Direct_Product
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Complex_Numbers_as_External_Direct_Product
[ "Complex Numbers", "External Direct Products" ]
[ "Definition:Group", "Definition:Zero (Number)/Complex", "Definition:Complex Number", "Definition:Multiplication/Complex Numbers", "Definition:Group", "Definition:Positive/Real Number", "Definition:Multiplication/Real Numbers", "Definition:Circle Group" ]
[ "Definition:Mapping", "Complex Multiplication is Closed", "Definition:Surjection", "Definition:Injective", "Definition:Injective", "Definition:Bijection", "Product of Complex Numbers in Exponential Form", "Exponential of Sum", "Definition:Group Homomorphism", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:...
proofwiki-10669
Complex Numbers as Quotient Ring of Real Polynomial
Let $\C$ be the set of complex numbers. Let $P \sqbrk x$ be the set of polynomials over real numbers, where the coefficients of the polynomials are real. Let $\ideal {x^2 + 1} = \set {\map Q x \paren {x^2 + 1}: \map Q x \in P \sqbrk x}$ be the ideal generated by $x^2 + 1$ in $P \sqbrk x$. Let $D = P \sqbrk x / \ideal {...
By Division Algorithm of Polynomial, any set in $D$ has an element in the form $a + b x$. Define $\phi: D \to \C$ as a mapping: :$\map \phi {\eqclass {a + b x} {x^2 + 1} } = a + b i$ We have that: :$\forall z = a + b i \in \C : \exists \eqclass {a + b x} {x^2 + 1} \in D$ such that: :$\map \phi {\eqclass {a + b x} {x^2 ...
Let $\C$ be the [[Definition:Complex Number|set of complex numbers]]. Let $P \sqbrk x$ be the set of [[Definition:Polynomial over Real Numbers|polynomials over real numbers]], where the [[Definition:Polynomial Coefficient|coefficients]] of the [[Definition:Polynomial over Real Numbers|polynomials]] are [[Definition:Re...
By [[Division Algorithm of Polynomial]], any set in $D$ has an [[Definition:Element|element]] in the form $a + b x$. Define $\phi: D \to \C$ as a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]: :$\map \phi {\eqclass {a + b x} {x^2 + 1} } = a + b i$ We have that: :$\forall z = a + b i \in \C : \exists \eqclass {a + b x} {x^2 + 1} \in...
Complex Numbers as Quotient Ring of Real Polynomial
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Complex_Numbers_as_Quotient_Ring_of_Real_Polynomial
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Complex_Numbers_as_Quotient_Ring_of_Real_Polynomial
[ "Complex Numbers", "Quotient Rings" ]
[ "Definition:Complex Number", "Definition:Polynomial/Real Numbers", "Definition:Coefficient of Polynomial", "Definition:Polynomial/Real Numbers", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Ideal of Ring", "Definition:Generator of Ideal of Ring", "Definition:Quotient Ring" ]
[ "Division Algorithm of Polynomial", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Surjection", "Definition:injection", "Equality of Complex Numbers", "Definition:Injection", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Homomorphism", "Definition:Quotient Ring", "Definition:Bijection", "Defini...
proofwiki-10670
Quaternion Modulus in Terms of Conjugate
Let $\mathbf x = a \mathbf 1 + b \mathbf i + c \mathbf j + d \mathbf k$ be a quaternion. Let $\size {\mathbf x}$ be the modulus of $\mathbf x$. Let $\overline {\mathbf x}$ be the conjugate of $\mathbf x$. Then: :$\size {\mathbf x}^2 \mathbf 1 = \mathbf x \overline {\mathbf x}$
Let $\mathbf x = a \mathbf 1 + b \mathbf i + c \mathbf j + d \mathbf k$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf x \overline {\mathbf x} | r = \paren {a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2} \mathbf 1 | c = Product of Quaternion with Conjugate }} {{eqn | r = \size {\mathbf x}^2 \mathbf 1 | c = {{Defof|Quaternion Modul...
Let $\mathbf x = a \mathbf 1 + b \mathbf i + c \mathbf j + d \mathbf k$ be a [[Definition:Quaternion|quaternion]]. Let $\size {\mathbf x}$ be the [[Definition:Quaternion Modulus|modulus]] of $\mathbf x$. Let $\overline {\mathbf x}$ be the [[Definition:Conjugate Quaternion|conjugate]] of $\mathbf x$. Then: :$\size {...
Let $\mathbf x = a \mathbf 1 + b \mathbf i + c \mathbf j + d \mathbf k$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf x \overline {\mathbf x} | r = \paren {a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2} \mathbf 1 | c = [[Product of Quaternion with Conjugate]] }} {{eqn | r = \size {\mathbf x}^2 \mathbf 1 | c = {{Defof|Quaternion ...
Quaternion Modulus in Terms of Conjugate
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quaternion_Modulus_in_Terms_of_Conjugate
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quaternion_Modulus_in_Terms_of_Conjugate
[ "Quaternion Modulus" ]
[ "Definition:Quaternion", "Definition:Quaternion Modulus", "Definition:Conjugate Quaternion" ]
[ "Product of Quaternion with Conjugate", "Category:Quaternion Modulus" ]
proofwiki-10671
Sufficient Condition for Quaternion Multiplication to Commute
In general, quaternion multiplication does not commute. But, for $\mathbf x,\mathbf y \in \H$, $\mathbf x \times \mathbf y = \mathbf y \times \mathbf x$ if any one of the following conditions hold: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1a | l = \mathbf x, \mathbf y | o = \in | r = \set {a \mathbf 1 + b \mathbf i ...
=== Proof of $\paren 1$ === It follows directly from Complex Numbers form Subfield of Quaternions and Complex Multiplication is Commutative. {{qed|lemma}}
In general, [[Definition:Quaternion/Multiplication|quaternion multiplication]] does not [[Definition:Commutative Operation|commute]]. But, for $\mathbf x,\mathbf y \in \H$, $\mathbf x \times \mathbf y = \mathbf y \times \mathbf x$ if any one of the following conditions hold: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1a | l = \...
=== Proof of $\paren 1$ === It follows directly from [[Complex Numbers form Subfield of Quaternions]] and [[Complex Multiplication is Commutative]]. {{qed|lemma}}
Sufficient Condition for Quaternion Multiplication to Commute
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sufficient_Condition_for_Quaternion_Multiplication_to_Commute
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sufficient_Condition_for_Quaternion_Multiplication_to_Commute
[ "Quaternions" ]
[ "Definition:Quaternion/Multiplication", "Definition:Commutative/Operation" ]
[ "Complex Numbers form Subfield of Quaternions", "Complex Multiplication is Commutative" ]
proofwiki-10672
Complex Conjugation is Involution
Let $z = x + i y$ be a complex number. Let $\overline z$ denote the complex conjugate of $z$. Then the operation of complex conjugation is an involution: :$\overline {\paren {\overline z} } = z$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \overline {\paren {\overline z} } | r = \overline {\paren {\overline {x + i y} } } | c = Definition of $z$ }} {{eqn | r = \overline {x - i y} | c = {{Defof|Complex Conjugate}} }} {{eqn | r = x + i y | c = {{Defof|Complex Conjugate}} }} {{eqn | r = z | c = Definiti...
Let $z = x + i y$ be a [[Definition:Complex Number|complex number]]. Let $\overline z$ denote the [[Definition:Complex Conjugate|complex conjugate]] of $z$. Then the [[Definition:Unary Operation|operation]] of [[Definition:Complex Conjugation|complex conjugation]] is an [[Definition:Involution (Mapping)|involution]]...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \overline {\paren {\overline z} } | r = \overline {\paren {\overline {x + i y} } } | c = Definition of $z$ }} {{eqn | r = \overline {x - i y} | c = {{Defof|Complex Conjugate}} }} {{eqn | r = x + i y | c = {{Defof|Complex Conjugate}} }} {{eqn | r = z | c = Definiti...
Complex Conjugation is Involution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Complex_Conjugation_is_Involution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Complex_Conjugation_is_Involution
[ "Complex Conjugates", "Involutions" ]
[ "Definition:Complex Number", "Definition:Complex Conjugate", "Definition:Operation/Unary Operation", "Definition:Complex Conjugate/Complex Conjugation", "Definition:Involution (Mapping)" ]
[]
proofwiki-10673
Quaternion Modulus of Conjugate
Let $z = a \mathbf 1 + b \mathbf i + c \mathbf j + d \mathbf k$ be a quaternion. Let $\overline z$ be the conjugate of $z$. Let $\cmod z$ be the quaternion modulus of $z$. Then: :$\cmod {\overline z} = \cmod z$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \cmod z | r = a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2 | c = {{Defof|Quaternion Modulus}} }} {{eqn | l = \cmod {\overline z} | r = \cmod {a \mathbf 1 - b \mathbf i - c \mathbf j - d \mathbf k} | c = {{Defof|Quaternion Conjugate}} }} {{eqn | r = a^2 + \paren {-b}^2 + \paren {-c}^2 + \paren...
Let $z = a \mathbf 1 + b \mathbf i + c \mathbf j + d \mathbf k$ be a [[Definition:Quaternion|quaternion]]. Let $\overline z$ be the [[Definition:Quaternion Conjugate|conjugate]] of $z$. Let $\cmod z$ be the [[Definition:Quaternion Modulus|quaternion modulus]] of $z$. Then: :$\cmod {\overline z} = \cmod z$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \cmod z | r = a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2 | c = {{Defof|Quaternion Modulus}} }} {{eqn | l = \cmod {\overline z} | r = \cmod {a \mathbf 1 - b \mathbf i - c \mathbf j - d \mathbf k} | c = {{Defof|Quaternion Conjugate}} }} {{eqn | r = a^2 + \paren {-b}^2 + \paren {-c}^2 + \paren...
Quaternion Modulus of Conjugate
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quaternion_Modulus_of_Conjugate
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quaternion_Modulus_of_Conjugate
[ "Quaternion Modulus" ]
[ "Definition:Quaternion", "Definition:Conjugate Quaternion", "Definition:Quaternion Modulus" ]
[ "Category:Quaternion Modulus" ]
proofwiki-10674
Quaternion Conjugation is Involution
Let $\mathbf x = a \mathbf 1 + b \mathbf i + c \mathbf j + d \mathbf k$ be a quaternion. Let $\overline {\mathbf x}$ denote the quaternion conjugate of $\mathbf x$. Then the operation of quaternion conjugation is an involution: :$\overline {\paren {\overline {\mathbf x} } } = \mathbf x$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \overline {\paren {\overline {\mathbf x} } } | r = \overline {\paren {\overline {a \mathbf 1 + b \mathbf i + c \mathbf j + d \mathbf k} } } | c = Definition of $\mathbf x$ }} {{eqn | r = \overline {a \mathbf 1 - b \mathbf i - c \mathbf j - d \mathbf k} | c = {{Defof|Quaternio...
Let $\mathbf x = a \mathbf 1 + b \mathbf i + c \mathbf j + d \mathbf k$ be a [[Definition:Quaternion|quaternion]]. Let $\overline {\mathbf x}$ denote the [[Definition:Quaternion Conjugate|quaternion conjugate]] of $\mathbf x$. Then the [[Definition:Unary Operation|operation]] of [[Definition:Quaternion Conjugate/Qua...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \overline {\paren {\overline {\mathbf x} } } | r = \overline {\paren {\overline {a \mathbf 1 + b \mathbf i + c \mathbf j + d \mathbf k} } } | c = Definition of $\mathbf x$ }} {{eqn | r = \overline {a \mathbf 1 - b \mathbf i - c \mathbf j - d \mathbf k} | c = {{Defof|Quaternio...
Quaternion Conjugation is Involution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quaternion_Conjugation_is_Involution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quaternion_Conjugation_is_Involution
[ "Complex Conjugates", "Involutions" ]
[ "Definition:Quaternion", "Definition:Conjugate Quaternion", "Definition:Operation/Unary Operation", "Definition:Quaternion Conjugate/Quaternion Conjugation", "Definition:Involution (Mapping)" ]
[ "Category:Complex Conjugates", "Category:Involutions" ]
proofwiki-10675
Sum of Quaternion Conjugates
Let $\mathbf x, \mathbf y \in \mathbb H$ be quaternions. Let $\overline {\mathbf x}$ be the conjugate of $\mathbf x$. Then: :$\overline {\mathbf x + \mathbf y} = \overline {\mathbf x} + \overline {\mathbf y}$
Let: :$\mathbf x = a \mathbf 1 + b \mathbf i + c \mathbf j + d \mathbf k$ :$\mathbf y = e \mathbf 1 + f \mathbf i + g \mathbf j + h \mathbf k$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \overline {\mathbf x + \mathbf y} | r = \overline {\paren {a \mathbf 1 + b \mathbf i + c \mathbf j + d \mathbf k} + \paren {e \mathbf 1 + f...
Let $\mathbf x, \mathbf y \in \mathbb H$ be [[Definition:Quaternion|quaternions]]. Let $\overline {\mathbf x}$ be the [[Definition:Quaternion Conjugate|conjugate]] of $\mathbf x$. Then: :$\overline {\mathbf x + \mathbf y} = \overline {\mathbf x} + \overline {\mathbf y}$
Let: :$\mathbf x = a \mathbf 1 + b \mathbf i + c \mathbf j + d \mathbf k$ :$\mathbf y = e \mathbf 1 + f \mathbf i + g \mathbf j + h \mathbf k$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \overline {\mathbf x + \mathbf y} | r = \overline {\paren {a \mathbf 1 + b \mathbf i + c \mathbf j + d \mathbf k} + \paren {e \mathbf 1 + ...
Sum of Quaternion Conjugates
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Quaternion_Conjugates
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Quaternion_Conjugates
[ "Quaternions" ]
[ "Definition:Quaternion", "Definition:Conjugate Quaternion" ]
[ "Category:Quaternions" ]
proofwiki-10676
Principle of Recursive Definition for Peano Structure
Let $\struct {P, 0, s}$ be a Peano structure. Let $T$ be a set. Let $a \in T$. Let $g: T \to T$ be a mapping. Then there exists exactly one mapping $f: P \to T$ such that: :<nowiki>$\forall x \in P: \map f x = \begin{cases} a & : x = 0 \\ \map g {\map f n} & : x = \map s n \end{cases}$</nowiki>
For each $n \in P$, define $\map A n$ as: :$\map A n = \set {h: P \to T \mid \map h 0 = a \land \forall m < n: \map h {\map s n} = \map g {\map h m} }$ {{MissingLinks|Ordering $<$ on Peano Structure}} First, we prove for all $n \in P$ that $\map A n$ is not empty. More formally, we prove that $A = \set {n \in P: \map A...
Let $\struct {P, 0, s}$ be a [[Definition:Peano Structure|Peano structure]]. Let $T$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. Let $a \in T$. Let $g: T \to T$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]. Then there exists exactly one [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]] $f: P \to T$ such that: :<nowiki>$\forall x \in P: \map f x = \begin{c...
For each $n \in P$, define $\map A n$ as: :$\map A n = \set {h: P \to T \mid \map h 0 = a \land \forall m < n: \map h {\map s n} = \map g {\map h m} }$ {{MissingLinks|Ordering $<$ on Peano Structure}} First, we prove for all $n \in P$ that $\map A n$ is not [[Definition:Empty Set|empty]]. More formally, we prove tha...
Principle of Recursive Definition for Peano Structure
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Principle_of_Recursive_Definition_for_Peano_Structure
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Principle_of_Recursive_Definition_for_Peano_Structure
[ "Principle of Recursive Definition", "Mapping Theory", "Peano's Axioms" ]
[ "Definition:Peano Structure", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Mapping" ]
[ "Definition:Empty Set", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Constant Mapping", "Axiom:Peano's Axioms", "Axiom:Peano's Axioms", "Category:Principle of Recursive Definition", "Category:Mapping Theory", "Category:Peano's Axioms" ]
proofwiki-10677
Principle of Recursive Definition for Minimally Inductive Set
Let $\omega$ be the minimally inductive set. Let $T$ be a set. Let $a \in T$. Let $g: T \to T$ be a mapping. Then there exists exactly one mapping $f: \omega \to T$ such that: :$\forall x \in \omega: \map f x = \begin {cases} a & : x = \O \\ \map g {\map f n} & : x = n^+ \end {cases}$ where $n^+$ is the successor set o...
{{questionable|The second principle of transfinite recursion that is linked to is not easily applicable to this situation}} Take the function $F$ generated in Second Principle of Transfinite Recursion. Set $f = F {\restriction_\omega}$. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map f \O | r = \map F \O | c = $\O \in \omeg...
Let $\omega$ be the [[Definition:Minimally Inductive Set|minimally inductive set]]. Let $T$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. Let $a \in T$. Let $g: T \to T$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]. Then there exists exactly one [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]] $f: \omega \to T$ such that: :$\forall x \in \omega: \map f x =...
{{questionable|The second principle of transfinite recursion that is linked to is not easily applicable to this situation}} Take the function $F$ generated in [[Second Principle of Transfinite Recursion]]. Set $f = F {\restriction_\omega}$. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map f \O | r = \map F \O | c = $\O \in...
Principle of Recursive Definition for Minimally Inductive Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Principle_of_Recursive_Definition_for_Minimally_Inductive_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Principle_of_Recursive_Definition_for_Minimally_Inductive_Set
[ "Mapping Theory", "Minimally Inductive Set", "Principle of Recursive Definition" ]
[ "Definition:Minimally Inductive Set", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Successor Mapping/Successor Set" ]
[ "Transfinite Recursion Theorem/Theorem 2", "Transfinite Recursion Theorem/Theorem 2" ]
proofwiki-10678
Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Trichotomy
Let $\N_{> 0}$ be the $1$-based natural numbers. Let $<$ be the strict ordering on $\N_{>0}$. Then exactly one of the following is true: :$(1): \quad a = b$ :$(2): \quad a > b$ :$(3): \quad a < b$ That is, $<$ is a trichotomy on $\N_{> 0}$.
Using the following axioms: {{:Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers}} Axiom $E$ states: :$\forall a, b \in \N_{>0}$, either: ::$a = b$, in which case $(1)$ holds ::$\exists x \in \N_{> 0}: a = b + x$, in which case, by definition of the ordering defined, $a > b$, in which case $(2)$ holds ::$\exists x \in \N...
Let $\N_{> 0}$ be the [[Definition:1-Based Natural Numbers|$1$-based natural numbers]]. Let $<$ be the [[Definition:Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers|strict ordering on $\N_{>0}$]]. Then exactly one of the following is true: :$(1): \quad a = b$ :$(2): \quad a > b$ :$(3): \quad a < b$ That is, $<$ is a [[Definitio...
Using the [[Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers|following axioms]]: {{:Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers}} [[Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers|Axiom $E$]] states: :$\forall a, b \in \N_{>0}$, either: ::$a = b$, in which case $(1)$ holds ::$\exists x \in \N_{> 0}: a = b + x$, in...
Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Trichotomy
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Ordering_on_1-Based_Natural_Numbers_is_Trichotomy
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Ordering_on_1-Based_Natural_Numbers_is_Trichotomy
[ "Natural Numbers/1-Based" ]
[ "Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers", "Definition:Ordering on Natural Numbers/1-Based", "Definition:Trichotomy" ]
[ "Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers", "Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers", "Definition:Ordering on Natural Numbers", "Definition:Ordering on Natural Numbers" ]
proofwiki-10679
Product of Quaternion Conjugates
Let $\mathbf x, \mathbf y \in \mathbb H$ be quaternions. Let $\overline {\mathbf x}$ be the conjugate of $\mathbf x$. Then: :$\overline {\mathbf x \times \mathbf y} = \overline {\mathbf y} \times \overline {\mathbf x}$ but in general: :$\overline {\mathbf x \times \mathbf y} \ne \overline {\mathbf x} \times \overline {...
Consider the matrix form of $\mathbf x$ and $\mathbf y$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf x | r = \begin {bmatrix} a & b \\ -\overline b & \overline a \end {bmatrix} }} {{eqn | l = \mathbf y | r = \begin {bmatrix} c & d \\ -\overline d & \overline c \end {bmatrix} }} {{end-eqn}} where $a, b, c, d \in \C$. ...
Let $\mathbf x, \mathbf y \in \mathbb H$ be [[Definition:Quaternion|quaternions]]. Let $\overline {\mathbf x}$ be the [[Definition:Quaternion Conjugate|conjugate]] of $\mathbf x$. Then: :$\overline {\mathbf x \times \mathbf y} = \overline {\mathbf y} \times \overline {\mathbf x}$ but in general: :$\overline {\math...
Consider the [[Matrix Form of Quaternion|matrix form]] of $\mathbf x$ and $\mathbf y$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf x | r = \begin {bmatrix} a & b \\ -\overline b & \overline a \end {bmatrix} }} {{eqn | l = \mathbf y | r = \begin {bmatrix} c & d \\ -\overline d & \overline c \end {bmatrix} }} {{end-eq...
Product of Quaternion Conjugates
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_of_Quaternion_Conjugates
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_of_Quaternion_Conjugates
[ "Quaternions" ]
[ "Definition:Quaternion", "Definition:Conjugate Quaternion" ]
[ "Matrix Form of Quaternion", "Complex Conjugation is Field Automorphism of Complex Numbers", "Complex Conjugation is Involution" ]
proofwiki-10680
Quaternion Modulus of Product of Quaternions
Let $\mathbf x, \mathbf y$ be quaternions. Let $\size {\mathbf x}$ be the modulus of $\mathbf x$. Then: :$\size {\mathbf {x y} } = \size {\mathbf x} \size {\mathbf y}$
Let $\mathbf x, \mathbf y$ be in their matrix form. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \size {\mathbf {x y} } | r = \sqrt {\map \det {\mathbf {x y} } } | c = {{Defof|Quaternion Modulus}} }} {{eqn | r = \sqrt {\map \det {\mathbf x} \map \det {\mathbf y} } | c = Determinant of Matrix Product }} {{eqn | r =...
Let $\mathbf x, \mathbf y$ be [[Definition:Quaternion|quaternions]]. Let $\size {\mathbf x}$ be the [[Definition:Quaternion Modulus|modulus]] of $\mathbf x$. Then: :$\size {\mathbf {x y} } = \size {\mathbf x} \size {\mathbf y}$
Let $\mathbf x, \mathbf y$ be in their [[Matrix Form of Quaternion|matrix form]]. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \size {\mathbf {x y} } | r = \sqrt {\map \det {\mathbf {x y} } } | c = {{Defof|Quaternion Modulus}} }} {{eqn | r = \sqrt {\map \det {\mathbf x} \map \det {\mathbf y} } | c = [[Determinant...
Quaternion Modulus of Product of Quaternions
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quaternion_Modulus_of_Product_of_Quaternions
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quaternion_Modulus_of_Product_of_Quaternions
[ "Quaternion Modulus" ]
[ "Definition:Quaternion", "Definition:Quaternion Modulus" ]
[ "Matrix Form of Quaternion", "Determinant of Matrix Product", "Exponent Combination Laws", "Category:Quaternion Modulus" ]
proofwiki-10681
Octonion Conjugation is Involution
Let $x = \tuple {a, b}: a, b \in \mathbb H$ be a octonion. Let $\overline x$ be the conjugate of $x$. Then: :$\overline \cdot: x \mapsto \overline x$ is an involution. That is: :$\overline {\paren {\overline x} } = x$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \overline {\paren {\overline x} } | r = \overline {\paren {\overline {\tuple {a, b} } } } | c = {{Defof|Octonion}} }} {{eqn | r = \overline {\tuple {\overline a, -b} } | c = {{Defof|Conjugate of Octonion}} }} {{eqn | r = \tuple {\overline {\paren {\overline a} }, -\paren {-b}...
Let $x = \tuple {a, b}: a, b \in \mathbb H$ be a [[Definition:Octonion|octonion]]. Let $\overline x$ be the [[Definition:Conjugate of Octonion|conjugate]] of $x$. Then: :$\overline \cdot: x \mapsto \overline x$ is an [[Definition:Involution (Mapping)|involution]]. That is: :$\overline {\paren {\overline x} } = x$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \overline {\paren {\overline x} } | r = \overline {\paren {\overline {\tuple {a, b} } } } | c = {{Defof|Octonion}} }} {{eqn | r = \overline {\tuple {\overline a, -b} } | c = {{Defof|Conjugate of Octonion}} }} {{eqn | r = \tuple {\overline {\paren {\overline a} }, -\paren {-b}...
Octonion Conjugation is Involution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Octonion_Conjugation_is_Involution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Octonion_Conjugation_is_Involution
[ "Octonions", "Involutions" ]
[ "Definition:Octonion", "Definition:Conjugate of Octonion", "Definition:Involution (Mapping)" ]
[ "Quaternion Conjugation is Involution", "Category:Octonions", "Category:Involutions" ]
proofwiki-10682
Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Compatible with Addition
Let $\N_{> 0}$ be the $1$-based natural numbers. Let $+$ denote addition on $\N_{>0}$. Let $<$ be the strict ordering on $\N_{>0}$. Then: :$\forall a, b, n \in \N_{>0}: a < b \implies a + n < b + n$ That is, $>$ is compatible with $+$ on $\N_{>0}$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a | o = < | r = b | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | q = \exists c \in \N_{>0} | l = a | r = b + c | c = {{Defof|Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers|Ordering on $1$-Based Natural Numbers}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = a + n | r = \paren {b +...
Let $\N_{> 0}$ be the [[Definition:1-Based Natural Numbers|$1$-based natural numbers]]. Let $+$ denote [[Definition:Addition on 1-Based Natural Numbers|addition]] on $\N_{>0}$. Let $<$ be the [[Definition:Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers|strict ordering on $\N_{>0}$]]. Then: :$\forall a, b, n \in \N_{>0}: a < b ...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a | o = < | r = b | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | q = \exists c \in \N_{>0} | l = a | r = b + c | c = {{Defof|Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers|Ordering on $1$-Based Natural Numbers}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = a + n | r = \paren {b +...
Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Compatible with Addition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Ordering_on_1-Based_Natural_Numbers_is_Compatible_with_Addition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Ordering_on_1-Based_Natural_Numbers_is_Compatible_with_Addition
[ "Natural Numbers/1-Based" ]
[ "Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers", "Definition:Addition on 1-Based Natural Numbers", "Definition:Ordering on Natural Numbers/1-Based", "Definition:Relation Compatible with Operation" ]
[ "Natural Number Addition is Associative", "Natural Number Addition is Commutative", "Natural Number Addition is Associative" ]
proofwiki-10683
Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Compatible with Multiplication
Let $\N_{> 0}$ be the $1$-based natural numbers. Let $\times$ denote multiplication on $\N_{>0}$. Let $<$ be the strict ordering on $\N_{>0}$. Then: :$\forall a, b, n \in \N_{>0}: a < b \implies a \times n < b \times n$ That is, $<$ is compatible with $\times$ on $\N_{>0}$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a | o = < | r = b | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | q = \exists c \in \N_{>0} | l = a | r = b + c | c = {{Defof|Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers|$<$ on $\N_{>0}$}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = a \times n | r = \paren {b + c} \times n ...
Let $\N_{> 0}$ be the [[Definition:1-Based Natural Numbers|$1$-based natural numbers]]. Let $\times$ denote [[Definition:Multiplication on 1-Based Natural Numbers|multiplication]] on $\N_{>0}$. Let $<$ be the [[Definition:Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers|strict ordering on $\N_{>0}$]]. Then: :$\forall a, b, n \i...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a | o = < | r = b | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | q = \exists c \in \N_{>0} | l = a | r = b + c | c = {{Defof|Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers|$<$ on $\N_{>0}$}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = a \times n | r = \paren {b + c} \times n ...
Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Compatible with Multiplication
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Ordering_on_1-Based_Natural_Numbers_is_Compatible_with_Multiplication
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Ordering_on_1-Based_Natural_Numbers_is_Compatible_with_Multiplication
[ "Natural Numbers/1-Based" ]
[ "Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers", "Definition:Natural Number Multiplication/1-Based", "Definition:Ordering on Natural Numbers/1-Based", "Definition:Relation Compatible with Operation" ]
[ "Natural Number Multiplication Distributes over Addition" ]
proofwiki-10684
Integral between Limits is Independent of Direction
Let $f$ be a real function which is integrable on the interval $\openint a b$. Then: :$\ds \int_a^b \map f x \rd x = \int_a^b \map f {a + b - x} \rd x$
Let $z = a + b - x$. Then: :$\dfrac {\d z} {\d x} = -1$ and: :$x = a \implies z = a + b - a = b$ :$x = b \implies z = a + b - b = a$ So: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int_a^b \map f {a + b - x} \rd x | r = \int_b^a \map f z \paren {-1} \rd z | c = Integration by Substitution }} {{eqn | r = \int_a^b \map f z \r...
Let $f$ be a [[Definition:Real Function|real function]] which is [[Definition:Integrable Function|integrable]] on the [[Definition:Open Real Interval|interval]] $\openint a b$. Then: :$\ds \int_a^b \map f x \rd x = \int_a^b \map f {a + b - x} \rd x$
Let $z = a + b - x$. Then: :$\dfrac {\d z} {\d x} = -1$ and: :$x = a \implies z = a + b - a = b$ :$x = b \implies z = a + b - b = a$ So: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int_a^b \map f {a + b - x} \rd x | r = \int_b^a \map f z \paren {-1} \rd z | c = [[Integration by Substitution]] }} {{eqn | r = \int_a^b \m...
Integral between Limits is Independent of Direction
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integral_between_Limits_is_Independent_of_Direction
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integral_between_Limits_is_Independent_of_Direction
[ "Definite Integrals" ]
[ "Definition:Real Function", "Definition:Integrable Function", "Definition:Real Interval/Open" ]
[ "Integration by Substitution", "Reversal of Limits of Definite Integral", "Category:Definite Integrals" ]
proofwiki-10685
Countable Set equals Range of Sequence
Let $S$ be a set. Then $S$ is countable {{iff}} there exists a sequence $\sequence {s_i}_{i \mathop \in N}$ where $N$ is a subset of $\N$ such that $S$ equals the range of $\sequence {s_i}_{i \mathop \in N}$.
=== Necessary Condition === Assume that $S$ is countable. We need to prove that there exists a sequence $\sequence {s_i}_{i \mathop \in N}$, $N \subseteq \N$, such that $S$ equals the range of $\sequence {s_i}_{i \mathop \in N}$. The range of $\sequence {s_i}_{i \mathop \in N}$ is defined as $\set {s_i: i \in N}$. ;Cas...
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. Then $S$ is [[Definition:Countable Set|countable]] {{iff}} there exists a [[Definition:Sequence|sequence]] $\sequence {s_i}_{i \mathop \in N}$ where $N$ is a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $\N$ such that $S$ equals the [[Definition:Range of Sequence|range]] of $\sequence {s_i}_{i...
=== Necessary Condition === Assume that $S$ is [[Definition:Countable Set/Definition 2|countable]]. We need to prove that there exists a [[Definition:Sequence|sequence]] $\sequence {s_i}_{i \mathop \in N}$, $N \subseteq \N$, such that $S$ equals the [[Definition:Range of Sequence|range]] of $\sequence {s_i}_{i \matho...
Countable Set equals Range of Sequence
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Countable_Set_equals_Range_of_Sequence
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Countable_Set_equals_Range_of_Sequence
[ "Countable Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Countable Set", "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Range of Sequence" ]
[ "Definition:Countable Set/Definition 2", "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Range of Sequence", "Definition:Range of Sequence", "Definition:Empty Set", "Empty Set is Countable", "Definition:Countable Set/Definition 2", "Definition:Sequence/Empty Sequence", "Definition:Range of Sequence", "Definiti...
proofwiki-10686
Equivalence of Definitions of Connected Set
{{TFAE|def = Connected Set (Topology)|view = Connected Set|context = Topology (Mathematical Branch)|contextview = Topology}} Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $H \subseteq S$ be a non-empty subset of $S$.
In order to prove equivalence, it is to be shown that if a subset of a topological space is not connected by one of the given definitions above, then it will likewise not be connected by one of the other definitions. Equivalence of definitions for connected set will then follow by the Rule of Transposition.
{{TFAE|def = Connected Set (Topology)|view = Connected Set|context = Topology (Mathematical Branch)|contextview = Topology}} Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $H \subseteq S$ be a [[Definition:Non-Empty Set|non-empty]] [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $S$.
In order to prove equivalence, it is to be shown that if a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]] is not [[Definition:Connected Set (Topology)|connected]] by one of the given definitions above, then it will likewise not be [[Definition:Connected Set (Topology)|connected]] b...
Equivalence of Definitions of Connected Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Connected_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Connected_Set
[ "Connected Sets (Topology)" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Subset" ]
[ "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)", "Rule of Transposition", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)" ]
proofwiki-10687
Initial Segment of Natural Numbers determined by Zero is Empty
Let $\N_k$ denote the initial segment of the natural numbers determined by $k$: :$\N_k = \set {0, 1, 2, 3, \ldots, k - 1}$ Then $\N_0 = \O$.
From the definition of $\N_0$: :$\N_0 = \set {n \in \N: n < 0}$ From the definition of zero, $0$ is the minimal element of $\N$. So there is no element $n$ of $\N$ such that $n < 0$. Thus $\N_0 = \O$. {{qed}} Category:Natural Numbers qbigqp7k4plig58dwsn1gh24fsrjyqb
Let $\N_k$ denote the [[Definition:Initial Segment of Natural Numbers|initial segment of the natural numbers]] determined by $k$: :$\N_k = \set {0, 1, 2, 3, \ldots, k - 1}$ Then $\N_0 = \O$.
From the [[Definition:Initial Segment of Natural Numbers|definition of $\N_0$]]: :$\N_0 = \set {n \in \N: n < 0}$ From the definition of [[Definition:Zero (Number)|zero]], $0$ is the [[Definition:Minimal Element|minimal element of $\N$]]. So there is no [[Definition:Element|element]] $n$ of $\N$ such that $n < 0$. ...
Initial Segment of Natural Numbers determined by Zero is Empty
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Initial_Segment_of_Natural_Numbers_determined_by_Zero_is_Empty
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Initial_Segment_of_Natural_Numbers_determined_by_Zero_is_Empty
[ "Natural Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Initial Segment of Natural Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Initial Segment of Natural Numbers", "Definition:Zero (Number)", "Definition:Minimal/Element", "Definition:Element", "Category:Natural Numbers" ]
proofwiki-10688
Initial Segment of One-Based Natural Numbers determined by Zero is Empty
Let $\N^*_k$ denote the initial segment of the one-based natural numbers determined by $k$: :$\N^*_k = \set {1, 2, 3, \ldots, k - 1, k}$ Then $\N^*_0 = \O$.
From the definition of $\N^*_0$: :$\N^*_0 = \set {n \in \N_{>0}: n \le 0}$ From the definition of one, the minimal element of $\N_{>0}$ is $1$. From Zero Strictly Precedes One we know that $0 < 1$. So there is no element $n$ of $\N_{>0}$ such that $n \le 0$. Thus $\N^*_0 = \O$. {{qed}}
Let $\N^*_k$ denote the [[Definition:Initial Segment of One-Based Natural Numbers|initial segment of the one-based natural numbers]] determined by $k$: :$\N^*_k = \set {1, 2, 3, \ldots, k - 1, k}$ Then $\N^*_0 = \O$.
From the [[Definition:Initial Segment of One-Based Natural Numbers|definition of $\N^*_0$]]: :$\N^*_0 = \set {n \in \N_{>0}: n \le 0}$ From the definition of [[Definition:One|one]], the [[Definition:Minimal Element|minimal element]] of $\N_{>0}$ is $1$. From [[Zero Strictly Precedes One]] we know that $0 < 1$. So ...
Initial Segment of One-Based Natural Numbers determined by Zero is Empty
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Initial_Segment_of_One-Based_Natural_Numbers_determined_by_Zero_is_Empty
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Initial_Segment_of_One-Based_Natural_Numbers_determined_by_Zero_is_Empty
[ "Natural Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Initial Segment of Natural Numbers/One-Based" ]
[ "Definition:Initial Segment of Natural Numbers/One-Based", "Definition:One", "Definition:Minimal/Element", "Zero Strictly Precedes One", "Definition:Element" ]
proofwiki-10689
Heine-Borel Theorem/Real Line/Closed and Bounded Interval
Let $\closedint a b$, $a < b$, be a closed and bounded real interval. Let $S$ be a set of open real sets. Let $S$ be a cover of $\closedint a b$. Then there is a finite subset of $S$ that covers $\closedint a b$.
Consider the set $T = \set {x \in \closedint a b: \closedint a x \text { is covered by a finite subset of } S}$.
Let $\closedint a b$, $a < b$, be a [[Definition:Closed Real Interval|closed and bounded real interval]]. Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Open Set (Real Analysis)|open real sets]]. Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Cover of Set|cover]] of $\closedint a b$. Then there is a [[Definition:Finite Set|finite]...
Consider the [[Definition:Set|set]] $T = \set {x \in \closedint a b: \closedint a x \text { is covered by a finite subset of } S}$.
Heine-Borel Theorem/Real Line/Closed and Bounded Interval
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Heine-Borel_Theorem/Real_Line/Closed_and_Bounded_Interval
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Heine-Borel_Theorem/Real_Line/Closed_and_Bounded_Interval
[ "Real Analysis", "Direct Proofs" ]
[ "Definition:Real Interval/Closed", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Open Set/Real Analysis", "Definition:Cover of Set", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Cover of Set" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Set" ]
proofwiki-10690
Addition on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Cancellable
Let $\N_{> 0}$ be the $1$-based natural numbers. Let $+$ be addition on $\N_{>0}$. Then: :$\forall a, b, c \in \N_{>0}: a + c = b + c \implies a = b$ :$\forall a, b, c \in \N_{>0}: a + b = a + c \implies b = c$ That is, $+$ is cancellable on $\N_{>0}$.
By Ordering on $1$-Based Natural Numbers is Trichotomy, one and only one of the following holds: :$a = b$ :$a < b$ :$b < a$ Suppose $a < b$. Then by Ordering on $1$-Based Natural Numbers is Compatible with Addition: :$a + c < b + c$ By Ordering on $1$-Based Natural Numbers is Trichotomy, this contradicts the fact that ...
Let $\N_{> 0}$ be the [[Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers|$1$-based natural numbers]]. Let $+$ be [[Definition:Addition on 1-Based Natural Numbers|addition]] on $\N_{>0}$. Then: :$\forall a, b, c \in \N_{>0}: a + c = b + c \implies a = b$ :$\forall a, b, c \in \N_{>0}: a + b = a + c \implies b = c$ T...
By [[Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Trichotomy|Ordering on $1$-Based Natural Numbers is Trichotomy]], one and only one of the following holds: :$a = b$ :$a < b$ :$b < a$ Suppose $a < b$. Then by [[Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Compatible with Addition|Ordering on $1$-Based Natural Numbers is Compati...
Addition on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Cancellable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Addition_on_1-Based_Natural_Numbers_is_Cancellable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Addition_on_1-Based_Natural_Numbers_is_Cancellable
[ "Natural Numbers/1-Based" ]
[ "Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers", "Definition:Addition on 1-Based Natural Numbers", "Definition:Cancellable Operation" ]
[ "Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Trichotomy", "Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Compatible with Addition", "Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Trichotomy", "Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Compatible with Addition", "Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Trichotomy", "Definition:R...
proofwiki-10691
Addition on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Cancellable for Ordering
Let $\N_{> 0}$ be the $1$-based natural numbers. Let $<$ be the strict ordering on $\N_{>0}$. Let $+$ be addition on $\N_{>0}$. Then: :$\forall a, b, c \in \N_{>0}: a + c < b + c \implies a < b$ :$\forall a, b, c \in \N_{>0}: a + b < a + c \implies b < c$ That is, $+$ is cancellable on $\N_{>0}$ for $<$.
By Ordering on $1$-Based Natural Numbers is Trichotomy, one and only one of the following holds: :$a = b$ :$a < b$ :$b < a$ Let $a + c < b + c$. Suppose $a = b$. Then by Ordering on $1$-Based Natural Numbers is Compatible with Addition: :$a + c = b + c$ By Ordering on $1$-Based Natural Numbers is Trichotomy, this contr...
Let $\N_{> 0}$ be the [[Definition:1-Based Natural Numbers|$1$-based natural numbers]]. Let $<$ be the [[Definition:Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers|strict ordering on $\N_{>0}$]]. Let $+$ be [[Definition:Addition on 1-Based Natural Numbers|addition]] on $\N_{>0}$. Then: :$\forall a, b, c \in \N_{>0}: a + c < b ...
By [[Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Trichotomy|Ordering on $1$-Based Natural Numbers is Trichotomy]], one and only one of the following holds: :$a = b$ :$a < b$ :$b < a$ Let $a + c < b + c$. Suppose $a = b$. Then by [[Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Compatible with Addition|Ordering on $1$-Based Natu...
Addition on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Cancellable for Ordering
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Addition_on_1-Based_Natural_Numbers_is_Cancellable_for_Ordering
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Addition_on_1-Based_Natural_Numbers_is_Cancellable_for_Ordering
[ "Natural Numbers/1-Based" ]
[ "Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers", "Definition:Ordering on Natural Numbers/1-Based", "Definition:Addition on 1-Based Natural Numbers", "Definition:Cancellable Operation" ]
[ "Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Trichotomy", "Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Compatible with Addition", "Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Trichotomy", "Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Compatible with Addition", "Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Trichotomy", "Definition:R...
proofwiki-10692
Multiplication on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Cancellable
Let $\N_{> 0}$ be the $1$-based natural numbers. Let $\times$ be multiplication on $\N_{>0}$. Then: :$\forall a, b, c \in \N_{>0}: a \times c = b \times c \implies a = b$ :$\forall a, b, c \in \N_{>0}: a \times b = a \times c \implies b = c$ That is, $\times$ is cancellable on $\N_{>0}$.
By Ordering on $1$-Based Natural Numbers is Trichotomy, one and only one of the following holds: :$a = b$ :$a < b$ :$b < a$ Suppose $a < b$. Then by Ordering on $1$-Based Natural Numbers is Compatible with Multiplication: :$a \times c < b \times c$ By Ordering on $1$-Based Natural Numbers is Trichotomy, this contradict...
Let $\N_{> 0}$ be the [[Definition:1-Based Natural Numbers|$1$-based natural numbers]]. Let $\times$ be [[Definition:Multiplication on 1-Based Natural Numbers|multiplication]] on $\N_{>0}$. Then: :$\forall a, b, c \in \N_{>0}: a \times c = b \times c \implies a = b$ :$\forall a, b, c \in \N_{>0}: a \times b = a \tim...
By [[Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Trichotomy|Ordering on $1$-Based Natural Numbers is Trichotomy]], one and only one of the following holds: :$a = b$ :$a < b$ :$b < a$ Suppose $a < b$. Then by [[Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Compatible with Multiplication|Ordering on $1$-Based Natural Numbers is C...
Multiplication on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Cancellable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Multiplication_on_1-Based_Natural_Numbers_is_Cancellable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Multiplication_on_1-Based_Natural_Numbers_is_Cancellable
[ "Natural Numbers/1-Based", "Natural Number Multiplication" ]
[ "Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers", "Definition:Natural Number Multiplication/1-Based", "Definition:Cancellable Operation" ]
[ "Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Trichotomy", "Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Compatible with Multiplication", "Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Trichotomy", "Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Compatible with Multiplication", "Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Trichotomy", "...
proofwiki-10693
Multiplication on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Cancellable for Ordering
Let $\N_{> 0}$ be the $1$-based natural numbers. Let $\times$ be multiplication on $\N_{>0}$. Let $<$ be the strict ordering on $\N_{>0}$. Then: :$\forall a, b, c \in \N_{>0}: a \times c < b \times c \implies a < b$ :$\forall a, b, c \in \N_{>0}: a \times b < a \times c \implies b < c$ That is, $\times$ is cancellable ...
By Ordering on $1$-Based Natural Numbers is Trichotomy, one and only one of the following holds: :$a = b$ :$a < b$ :$b < a$ Let $a \times c < b \times c$. Suppose $a = b$. Then by Ordering on $1$-Based Natural Numbers is Compatible with Multiplication: :$a \times c = b \times c$ By Ordering on $1$-Based Natural Numbers...
Let $\N_{> 0}$ be the [[Definition:1-Based Natural Numbers|$1$-based natural numbers]]. Let $\times$ be [[Definition:Multiplication on 1-Based Natural Numbers|multiplication]] on $\N_{>0}$. Let $<$ be the [[Definition:Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers|strict ordering on $\N_{>0}$]]. Then: :$\forall a, b, c \in \N...
By [[Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Trichotomy|Ordering on $1$-Based Natural Numbers is Trichotomy]], one and only one of the following holds: :$a = b$ :$a < b$ :$b < a$ Let $a \times c < b \times c$. Suppose $a = b$. Then by [[Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Compatible with Multiplication|Ordering o...
Multiplication on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Cancellable for Ordering
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Multiplication_on_1-Based_Natural_Numbers_is_Cancellable_for_Ordering
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Multiplication_on_1-Based_Natural_Numbers_is_Cancellable_for_Ordering
[ "Natural Numbers/1-Based", "Natural Number Multiplication" ]
[ "Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers", "Definition:Natural Number Multiplication/1-Based", "Definition:Ordering on Natural Numbers/1-Based", "Definition:Cancellable Operation" ]
[ "Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Trichotomy", "Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Compatible with Multiplication", "Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Trichotomy", "Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Compatible with Multiplication", "Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Trichotomy", "...
proofwiki-10694
Index of Trivial Subgroup is Cardinality of Group
Let $G$ be a group whose identity element is $e$. Let $\set e$ be the trivial subgroup of $G$. Then: :$\index G {\set e} = \order G$ where: :$\index G {\set e}$ denotes the index of $\set e$ in $G$ :$\order G$ denotes the cardinality of $G$.
By definition of cardinality and the trivial subgroup: :$\order {\set e} = 1$ From Lagrange's Theorem: :$\index G {\set e} = \dfrac {\order G} {\order {\set e} } = \dfrac {\order G} 1 = \order G$ {{qed}}
Let $G$ be a [[Definition:Group|group]] whose [[Definition:Identity Element|identity element]] is $e$. Let $\set e$ be the [[Definition:Trivial Subgroup|trivial subgroup]] of $G$. Then: :$\index G {\set e} = \order G$ where: :$\index G {\set e}$ denotes the [[Definition:Index of Subgroup|index]] of $\set e$ in $G$ :...
By definition of [[Definition:Cardinality|cardinality]] and the [[Definition:Trivial Subgroup|trivial subgroup]]: :$\order {\set e} = 1$ From [[Lagrange's Theorem (Group Theory)|Lagrange's Theorem]]: :$\index G {\set e} = \dfrac {\order G} {\order {\set e} } = \dfrac {\order G} 1 = \order G$ {{qed}}
Index of Trivial Subgroup is Cardinality of Group
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Index_of_Trivial_Subgroup_is_Cardinality_of_Group
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Index_of_Trivial_Subgroup_is_Cardinality_of_Group
[ "Order of Groups", "Index of Subgroups" ]
[ "Definition:Group", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity", "Definition:Trivial Subgroup", "Definition:Index of Subgroup", "Definition:Cardinality" ]
[ "Definition:Cardinality", "Definition:Trivial Subgroup", "Lagrange's Theorem (Group Theory)" ]
proofwiki-10695
Index is One iff Subgroup equals Group
Let $G$ be a group whose identity element is $e$. Let $H$ be a subgroup of $G$. Then: :$\index G H = 1 \iff G = H$ where $\index G H$ denotes the index of $H$ in $G$.
For finite groups, we can apply Lagrange's Theorem: :$\index G H = \dfrac {\order G} {\order H}$ But then: :$\dfrac {\order G} {\order H} = 1 \iff \order G = \order H$ Hence the result. For the general case (including infinite groups) we need to consider the (left) coset space $G / H$. Note that we must have $e H = H \...
Let $G$ be a [[Definition:Group|group]] whose [[Definition:Identity Element|identity element]] is $e$. Let $H$ be a [[Definition:Subgroup|subgroup]] of $G$. Then: :$\index G H = 1 \iff G = H$ where $\index G H$ denotes the [[Definition:Index of Subgroup|index]] of $H$ in $G$.
For [[Definition:Finite Group|finite groups]], we can apply [[Lagrange's Theorem (Group Theory)|Lagrange's Theorem]]: :$\index G H = \dfrac {\order G} {\order H}$ But then: :$\dfrac {\order G} {\order H} = 1 \iff \order G = \order H$ Hence the result. For the general case (including [[Definition:Infinite Group|infi...
Index is One iff Subgroup equals Group
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Index_is_One_iff_Subgroup_equals_Group
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Index_is_One_iff_Subgroup_equals_Group
[ "Order of Groups", "Index of Subgroups" ]
[ "Definition:Group", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity", "Definition:Subgroup", "Definition:Index of Subgroup" ]
[ "Definition:Finite Group", "Lagrange's Theorem (Group Theory)", "Definition:Infinite Group", "Definition:Coset Space/Left Coset Space" ]
proofwiki-10696
Set Equality is Equivalence Relation
Let $S$ be a set. Set equality is an equivalence relation on the power set $\powerset S$ of $S$.
Checking in turn each of the criteria for equivalence:
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. [[Definition:Set Equality|Set equality]] is an [[Definition:Equivalence Relation|equivalence relation]] on the [[Definition:Power Set|power set]] $\powerset S$ of $S$.
Checking in turn each of the criteria for [[Definition:Equivalence Relation|equivalence]]:
Set Equality is Equivalence Relation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Equality_is_Equivalence_Relation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Equality_is_Equivalence_Relation
[ "Set Theory", "Examples of Equivalence Relations" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Set Equality", "Definition:Equivalence Relation", "Definition:Power Set" ]
[ "Definition:Equivalence Relation", "Definition:Equivalence Relation" ]
proofwiki-10697
Subset Relation is Antisymmetric
The subset relation is '''antisymmetric''': :$\paren {x \subseteq y} \land \paren {y \subseteq x} \iff x = y$ where $x$ and $y$ are sets.
This is a direct statement of the definition of set equality: :$x = y := \paren {x \subseteq y} \land \paren {y \subseteq x}$ {{qed}}
The [[Definition:Subset Relation|subset relation]] is '''[[Definition:Antisymmetric Relation|antisymmetric]]''': :$\paren {x \subseteq y} \land \paren {y \subseteq x} \iff x = y$ where $x$ and $y$ are [[Definition:Set|sets]].
This is a direct statement of the definition of [[Definition:Set Equality/Definition 2|set equality]]: :$x = y := \paren {x \subseteq y} \land \paren {y \subseteq x}$ {{qed}}
Subset Relation is Antisymmetric
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subset_Relation_is_Antisymmetric
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subset_Relation_is_Antisymmetric
[ "Subset Relation", "Examples of Antisymmetric Relations" ]
[ "Definition:Subset Relation", "Definition:Antisymmetric Relation", "Definition:Set" ]
[ "Definition:Set Equality/Definition 2" ]
proofwiki-10698
There Exists No Universal Set
There exists no set which is an absolutely universal set. That is: :$\map \neg {\exists \, \UU: \forall T: T \in \UU}$ where $T$ is any arbitrary object at all. That is, a set that contains ''everything'' cannot exist.
{{AimForCont}} such a $\UU$ exists. Using the Axiom of Specification, we can create the set: :$R = \set {x \in \UU: x \notin x}$ But from Russell's Paradox, this set cannot exist. Thus: :$R \notin \UU$ and so $\UU$ cannot contain everything. {{qed}}
There exists no [[Definition:Set|set]] which is an absolutely [[Definition:Universal Set|universal set]]. That is: :$\map \neg {\exists \, \UU: \forall T: T \in \UU}$ where $T$ is any arbitrary [[Definition:Object|object]] at all. That is, a [[Definition:Set|set]] that contains ''everything'' cannot exist.
{{AimForCont}} such a $\UU$ exists. Using the [[Axiom:Axiom of Specification (Sets)|Axiom of Specification]], we can create the [[Definition:Set|set]]: :$R = \set {x \in \UU: x \notin x}$ But from [[Russell's Paradox]], this [[Definition:Set|set]] cannot exist. Thus: :$R \notin \UU$ and so $\UU$ cannot contain ever...
There Exists No Universal Set/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/There_Exists_No_Universal_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/There_Exists_No_Universal_Set/Proof_1
[ "There Exists No Universal Set", "Universal Set", "Naive Set Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Universal Set", "Definition:Object", "Definition:Set" ]
[ "Axiom:Axiom of Specification/Set Theory", "Definition:Set", "Russell's Paradox", "Definition:Set" ]
proofwiki-10699
There Exists No Universal Set
There exists no set which is an absolutely universal set. That is: :$\map \neg {\exists \, \UU: \forall T: T \in \UU}$ where $T$ is any arbitrary object at all. That is, a set that contains ''everything'' cannot exist.
Let $\SS$ be the set of all sets. Then $\SS$ must be an element of itself: :$\SS \owns \SS$ Thus we have an infinite descending sequence of membership: :$\SS \owns \SS \owns \SS \owns \cdots$ But by No Infinitely Descending Membership Chains, no such sequence exists, a contradiction. {{qed}}
There exists no [[Definition:Set|set]] which is an absolutely [[Definition:Universal Set|universal set]]. That is: :$\map \neg {\exists \, \UU: \forall T: T \in \UU}$ where $T$ is any arbitrary [[Definition:Object|object]] at all. That is, a [[Definition:Set|set]] that contains ''everything'' cannot exist.
Let $\SS$ be the [[Definition:Set|set]] of all [[Definition:Set|sets]]. Then $\SS$ must be an [[Definition:Element|element]] of itself: :$\SS \owns \SS$ Thus we have an infinite descending sequence of membership: :$\SS \owns \SS \owns \SS \owns \cdots$ But by [[No Infinitely Descending Membership Chains]], no such ...
There Exists No Universal Set/Proof 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/There_Exists_No_Universal_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/There_Exists_No_Universal_Set/Proof_3
[ "There Exists No Universal Set", "Universal Set", "Naive Set Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Universal Set", "Definition:Object", "Definition:Set" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Element", "No Infinitely Descending Membership Chains", "Definition:Contradiction" ]