id
stringlengths
11
15
title
stringlengths
7
171
problem
stringlengths
9
4.33k
solution
stringlengths
6
19k
problem_wikitext
stringlengths
9
4.42k
solution_wikitext
stringlengths
7
19.1k
proof_title
stringlengths
9
171
theorem_url
stringlengths
34
198
proof_url
stringlengths
36
198
categories
listlengths
0
9
theorem_references
listlengths
0
36
proof_references
listlengths
0
253
proofwiki-10800
Derivative of Derivative is Subset of Derivative in T1 Space
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a $T_1$ topological space. Let $A$ be a subset of $S$. Then :$A' ' \subseteq A'$ where :$A'$ denotes the derivative of $A$
Let: :$(1): \quad x \in A' '$ {{AimForCont}} $x \notin A'$. Then by Characterization of Derivative by Open Sets there exists an open subset $G$ of $T$ such that: :$(2): \quad x \in G$ and: :$(3): \quad \lnot \exists y: y \in A \cap G \land x \ne y$ By definition of $T_1$ space: :$\set x$ is closed. Then by Open Set min...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:T1 Space|$T_1$ topological space]]. Let $A$ be a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $S$. Then :$A' ' \subseteq A'$ where :$A'$ denotes the [[Definition:Set Derivative|derivative]] of $A$
Let: :$(1): \quad x \in A' '$ {{AimForCont}} $x \notin A'$. Then by [[Characterization of Derivative by Open Sets]] there exists an open subset $G$ of $T$ such that: :$(2): \quad x \in G$ and: :$(3): \quad \lnot \exists y: y \in A \cap G \land x \ne y$ By definition of [[Definition:T1 Space|$T_1$ space]]: :$\set x$ ...
Derivative of Derivative is Subset of Derivative in T1 Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Derivative_is_Subset_of_Derivative_in_T1_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Derivative_is_Subset_of_Derivative_in_T1_Space
[ "Set Derivatives", "T1 Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:T1 Space", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Set Derivative" ]
[ "Characterization of Derivative by Open Sets", "Definition:T1 Space", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Open Set minus Closed Set is Open", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Characterization of Derivative by Open Sets", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Set Difference", "Definition:Set Inte...
proofwiki-10801
Closure of Derivative is Derivative in T1 Space
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a $T_1$ topological space. Let $A$ be a subset of $S$. Then :$A'^- = A'$ where :$A'$ denotes the derivative of $A$ :$A^-$ denotes the closure of $A$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = A'^- | r = A' \cup A' ' | c = Closure Equals Union with Derivative }} {{eqn | o = \subseteq | r = A' \cup A' | c = $A' ' \subseteq A'$ by Derivative of Derivative is Subset of Derivative in T1 Space }} {{eqn | r = A' | c = Set Union is Idempotent }} {{end-eqn}} So...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:T1 Space|$T_1$ topological space]]. Let $A$ be a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $S$. Then :$A'^- = A'$ where :$A'$ denotes the [[Definition:Set Derivative|derivative]] of $A$ :$A^-$ denotes the [[Definition:Closure (Topology)|closure]] of $A$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = A'^- | r = A' \cup A' ' | c = [[Closure Equals Union with Derivative]] }} {{eqn | o = \subseteq | r = A' \cup A' | c = $A' ' \subseteq A'$ by [[Derivative of Derivative is Subset of Derivative in T1 Space]] }} {{eqn | r = A' | c = [[Set Union is Idempotent]] }} {{...
Closure of Derivative is Derivative in T1 Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closure_of_Derivative_is_Derivative_in_T1_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closure_of_Derivative_is_Derivative_in_T1_Space
[ "Set Derivatives", "Set Closures", "T1 Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:T1 Space", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Set Derivative", "Definition:Closure (Topology)" ]
[ "Closure Equals Union with Derivative", "Derivative of Derivative is Subset of Derivative in T1 Space", "Set Union is Idempotent", "Definition:Closure (Topology)/Definition 3", "Definition:Set Equality" ]
proofwiki-10802
Union of Derivatives is Subset of Derivative of Union
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let: :$\FF \subseteq \powerset S$ be a set of subsets of $S$ where $\powerset S$ denotes the power set of $S$. Then: :$\ds \bigcup_{A \mathop \in \FF} A' \subseteq \paren {\bigcup_{A \mathop \in \FF} A}'$ where $A'$ denotes the derivative of $A$.
Let $\ds x \in \bigcup_{A \mathop \in \FF} A'$. Then by definition of union there exists $A \in \FF$ such that: :$(1): \quad x \in A'$ By Set is Subset of Union: :$\ds A \subseteq \bigcup_{A \mathop \in \FF} A$ Then by Derivative of Subset is Subset of Derivative: :$\ds A' \subseteq \paren {\bigcup_{A \mathop \in \FF} ...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let: :$\FF \subseteq \powerset S$ be a [[Definition:Set of Sets|set of subsets]] of $S$ where $\powerset S$ denotes the [[Definition:Power Set|power set]] of $S$. Then: :$\ds \bigcup_{A \mathop \in \FF} A' \subseteq \paren {\bigcup_...
Let $\ds x \in \bigcup_{A \mathop \in \FF} A'$. Then by definition of [[Definition:Union of Family|union]] there exists $A \in \FF$ such that: :$(1): \quad x \in A'$ By [[Set is Subset of Union/Set of Sets|Set is Subset of Union]]: :$\ds A \subseteq \bigcup_{A \mathop \in \FF} A$ Then by [[Derivative of Subset is Su...
Union of Derivatives is Subset of Derivative of Union
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_of_Derivatives_is_Subset_of_Derivative_of_Union
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_of_Derivatives_is_Subset_of_Derivative_of_Union
[ "Set Derivatives" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Set of Sets", "Definition:Power Set", "Definition:Set Derivative" ]
[ "Definition:Set Union/Family of Sets", "Set is Subset of Union/Set of Sets", "Derivative of Subset is Subset of Derivative", "Definition:Subset" ]
proofwiki-10803
Point is Isolated iff not Accumulation Point
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $H \subseteq S$. Let $x \in H$. Then: :$x$ is an isolated point in $H$ {{iff}}: :$x$ is not an accumulation point of $H$
=== Sufficient Condition === Let $x \in H$ be an isolated point in $H$. Then by definition of isolated point: :$\exists U \in \tau: H \cap U = \set x$ That is, by definition of uniqueness: :$\lnot \forall U \in \tau: \paren {x \in U \implies \exists y \in S: \paren {y \in H \cap U \land x \ne y} }$ Hence by Characteriz...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $H \subseteq S$. Let $x \in H$. Then: :$x$ is an [[Definition:Isolated Point (Topology)|isolated point]] in $H$ {{iff}}: :$x$ is not an [[Definition:Accumulation Point of Set|accumulation point]] of $H$
=== Sufficient Condition === Let $x \in H$ be an [[Definition:Isolated Point (Topology)|isolated point]] in $H$. Then by definition of [[Definition:Isolated Point (Topology)|isolated point]]: :$\exists U \in \tau: H \cap U = \set x$ That is, by definition of [[Definition:Unique|uniqueness]]: :$\lnot \forall U \in \t...
Point is Isolated iff not Accumulation Point
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Point_is_Isolated_iff_not_Accumulation_Point
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Point_is_Isolated_iff_not_Accumulation_Point
[ "Isolated Points", "Accumulation Points" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Isolated Point (Topology)", "Definition:Accumulation Point/Set" ]
[ "Definition:Isolated Point (Topology)", "Definition:Isolated Point (Topology)", "Definition:Unique", "Characterization of Derivative by Open Sets", "Definition:Set Derivative", "Definition:Set Derivative", "Definition:Accumulation Point/Set", "Definition:Accumulation Point/Set", "Definition:Set Deri...
proofwiki-10804
Point is Isolated iff belongs to Set less Derivative
Let $T = \left({S, \tau}\right)$ be a topological space. Let $H \subseteq S$. Let $x \in S$. Then: :$x$ is an isolated point in $H$ {{iff}}: :$x \in H \setminus H'$ where :$H'$ denotes the derivative of $H$.
$x$ is an isolated point in $H$ $\iff$ $x \in H$ and $x$ is not an accumulation point of $H$ by Point is Isolated iff not Accumulation Point $\iff$ $x \in H$ and $x \notin H'$ by definition of derivative $\iff$ $x \in H \setminus H'$ by definition of set difference. {{qed}}
Let $T = \left({S, \tau}\right)$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $H \subseteq S$. Let $x \in S$. Then: :$x$ is an [[Definition:Isolated Point (Topology)|isolated point]] in $H$ {{iff}}: :$x \in H \setminus H'$ where :$H'$ denotes the [[Definition:Set Derivative|derivative]] of $H$.
$x$ is an [[Definition:Isolated Point (Topology)|isolated point]] in $H$ $\iff$ $x \in H$ and $x$ is not an [[Definition:Accumulation Point of Sequence|accumulation point]] of $H$ by [[Point is Isolated iff not Accumulation Point]] $\iff$ $x \in H$ and $x \notin H'$ by definition of [[Definition:Set Derivative|deriva...
Point is Isolated iff belongs to Set less Derivative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Point_is_Isolated_iff_belongs_to_Set_less_Derivative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Point_is_Isolated_iff_belongs_to_Set_less_Derivative
[ "Isolated Points", "Set Derivatives" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Isolated Point (Topology)", "Definition:Set Derivative" ]
[ "Definition:Isolated Point (Topology)", "Definition:Accumulation Point/Sequence", "Point is Isolated iff not Accumulation Point", "Definition:Set Derivative", "Definition:Set Difference" ]
proofwiki-10805
Dense-in-itself iff Subset of Derivative
Let $T$ be a topological space. Let $A \subseteq T$. Then: :$A$ is dense-in-itself {{iff}}: :$A \subseteq A'$ where $A'$ denotes the derivative of $A$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | c = $A$ is dense-in-itself }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | o = | c = every $x \in A$ is not an isolated point in $A$ | cc= {{Defof|Dense-in-itself}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | o = | c = every $x \in A$ is an accumulation point of $A$ | cc= Poi...
Let $T$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $A \subseteq T$. Then: :$A$ is [[Definition:Dense-in-itself|dense-in-itself]] {{iff}}: :$A \subseteq A'$ where $A'$ denotes the [[Definition:Set Derivative|derivative]] of $A$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | c = $A$ is [[Definition:Dense-in-itself|dense-in-itself]] }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | o = | c = every $x \in A$ is not an [[Definition:Isolated Point (Topology)|isolated point]] in $A$ | cc= {{Defof|Dense-in-itself}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | o = ...
Dense-in-itself iff Subset of Derivative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Dense-in-itself_iff_Subset_of_Derivative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Dense-in-itself_iff_Subset_of_Derivative
[ "Set Derivatives", "Dense-in-itself" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Dense-in-itself", "Definition:Set Derivative" ]
[ "Definition:Dense-in-itself", "Definition:Isolated Point (Topology)", "Definition:Accumulation Point/Set", "Point is Isolated iff not Accumulation Point", "Definition:Element", "Category:Set Derivatives", "Category:Dense-in-itself" ]
proofwiki-10806
Closure of Dense-in-itself is Dense-in-itself in T1 Space
Let $T$ be a $T_1$ topological space. Let $A \subseteq T$. Let $A$ be dense-in-itself. Then the closure $A^-$ of $A$ is also dense-in-itself.
Let $A$ be dense-in-itself. Then by Dense-in-itself iff Subset of Derivative: :$(1): \quad A \subseteq A'$ where $A'$ denotes the derivative of $A$. By Derivative of Derivative is Subset of Derivative in $T_1$ Space: :$(2): \quad A' ' \subseteq A'$ By Dense-in-itself iff Subset of Derivative it is sufficient to proof t...
Let $T$ be a [[Definition:T1 Space|$T_1$]] [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $A \subseteq T$. Let $A$ be [[Definition:Dense-in-itself|dense-in-itself]]. Then the [[Definition:Closure (Topology)|closure]] $A^-$ of $A$ is also [[Definition:Dense-in-itself|dense-in-itself]].
Let $A$ be [[Definition:Dense-in-itself|dense-in-itself]]. Then by [[Dense-in-itself iff Subset of Derivative]]: :$(1): \quad A \subseteq A'$ where $A'$ denotes the [[Definition:Set Derivative|derivative]] of $A$. By [[Derivative of Derivative is Subset of Derivative in T1 Space|Derivative of Derivative is Subset of ...
Closure of Dense-in-itself is Dense-in-itself in T1 Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closure_of_Dense-in-itself_is_Dense-in-itself_in_T1_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closure_of_Dense-in-itself_is_Dense-in-itself_in_T1_Space
[ "Dense-in-itself", "Set Closures", "T1 Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:T1 Space", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Dense-in-itself", "Definition:Closure (Topology)", "Definition:Dense-in-itself" ]
[ "Definition:Dense-in-itself", "Dense-in-itself iff Subset of Derivative", "Definition:Set Derivative", "Derivative of Derivative is Subset of Derivative in T1 Space", "Dense-in-itself iff Subset of Derivative", "Closure Equals Union with Derivative", "Derivative of Union is Union of Derivatives", "Uni...
proofwiki-10807
Union of Set of Dense-in-itself Sets is Dense-in-itself
Let $T$ be a topological space. Let $\FF \subseteq \powerset T$ such that: :every element of $\FF$ is dense-in-itself. Then the union $\bigcup \FF$ is also dense-in-itself.
By Dense-in-itself iff Subset of Derivative: :$\forall A \in \FF: A \subseteq A'$ where $A'$ denotes the derivative of $A$. Then by Set Union Preserves Subsets: :$\ds \bigcup \FF \subseteq \bigcup_{A \mathop \in \FF} A'$ By Union of Derivatives is Subset of Derivative of Union: :$\ds \bigcup_{A \mathop \in \FF} A' \sub...
Let $T$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $\FF \subseteq \powerset T$ such that: :every [[Definition:Element|element]] of $\FF$ is [[Definition:Dense-in-itself|dense-in-itself]]. Then the [[Definition:Union of Set of Sets|union]] $\bigcup \FF$ is also [[Definition:Dense-in-itself|dense-in-...
By [[Dense-in-itself iff Subset of Derivative]]: :$\forall A \in \FF: A \subseteq A'$ where $A'$ denotes the [[Definition:Set Derivative|derivative]] of $A$. Then by [[Set Union Preserves Subsets]]: :$\ds \bigcup \FF \subseteq \bigcup_{A \mathop \in \FF} A'$ By [[Union of Derivatives is Subset of Derivative of Union]...
Union of Set of Dense-in-itself Sets is Dense-in-itself
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_of_Set_of_Dense-in-itself_Sets_is_Dense-in-itself
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_of_Set_of_Dense-in-itself_Sets_is_Dense-in-itself
[ "Dense-in-itself", "Set Derivatives" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Dense-in-itself", "Definition:Set Union/Set of Sets", "Definition:Dense-in-itself" ]
[ "Dense-in-itself iff Subset of Derivative", "Definition:Set Derivative", "Set Union Preserves Subsets", "Union of Derivatives is Subset of Derivative of Union", "Subset Relation is Transitive", "Dense-in-itself iff Subset of Derivative" ]
proofwiki-10808
Equivalence of Definitions of Weight of Topological Space
Let $T$ be a topological space. Let $\mathbb B$ be the set of all bases of $T$. The following definitions of the weight of $T$ are equivalent: === Definition 1 === {{:Definition:Weight of Topological Space/Definition 1}} === Definition 2 === {{:Definition:Weight of Topological Space/Definition 2}}
By Class of All Cardinals is Subclass of Class of All Ordinals, the set: :$M = \set {\card \BB: \BB \in \mathbb B}$ is a subclass of the class of all ordinals. By Class of All Ordinals is Well-Ordered by Subset Relation: :$M$ is well ordered by the $\subseteq$ relation. By Class of All Ordinals is Well-Ordered by Subse...
Let $T$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $\mathbb B$ be the [[Definition:Set|set]] of all [[Definition:Analytic Basis|bases]] of $T$. The following definitions of the [[Definition:Weight of Topological Space|weight of $T$]] are [[Definition:Logical Equivalence|equivalent]]: === [[Definit...
By [[Class of All Cardinals is Subclass of Class of All Ordinals]], the [[Definition:Set|set]]: :$M = \set {\card \BB: \BB \in \mathbb B}$ is a [[Definition:Subclass|subclass]] of the [[Definition:Class of All Ordinals|class of all ordinals]]. By [[Class of All Ordinals is Well-Ordered by Subset Relation]]: :$M$ is [[...
Equivalence of Definitions of Weight of Topological Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Weight_of_Topological_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Weight_of_Topological_Space
[ "Weights of Topological Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis", "Definition:Weight of Topological Space", "Definition:Logical Equivalence", "Definition:Weight of Topological Space/Definition 1", "Definition:Weight of Topological Space/Definition 2" ]
[ "Class of All Cardinals is Subclass of Class of All Ordinals", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Subclass", "Definition:Class of All Ordinals", "Class of All Ordinals is Well-Ordered by Subset Relation", "Definition:Well-Ordering", "Definition:Subset Relation", "Class of All Ordinals is Well-Ordered by Su...
proofwiki-10809
Space is First-Countable iff Character not greater than Aleph 0
Let $T$ be a topological space. $T$ is first-countable {{iff}}: :$\map \chi T \le \aleph_0$ where $\map \chi T$ denotes the character of $T$.
=== Sufficient Condition === Let $T$ be first-countable. By definition of first-countable: :$\forall x \in T: \exists \BB \in \map {\mathbb B} x: \card \BB \le \aleph_0$ where $\map {\mathbb B} x$ denotes the set of all local bases at $x$. Then by definition of character of a point: :$\forall x \in T: \map \chi {x, T} ...
Let $T$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. $T$ is [[Definition:First-Countable Space|first-countable]] {{iff}}: :$\map \chi T \le \aleph_0$ where $\map \chi T$ denotes the [[Definition:Character of Topological Space|character]] of $T$.
=== Sufficient Condition === Let $T$ be [[Definition:First-Countable Space|first-countable]]. By definition of [[Definition:First-Countable Space|first-countable]]: :$\forall x \in T: \exists \BB \in \map {\mathbb B} x: \card \BB \le \aleph_0$ where $\map {\mathbb B} x$ denotes the set of all [[Definition:Local Basi...
Space is First-Countable iff Character not greater than Aleph 0
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Space_is_First-Countable_iff_Character_not_greater_than_Aleph_0
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Space_is_First-Countable_iff_Character_not_greater_than_Aleph_0
[ "First-Countable Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:First-Countable Space", "Definition:Character of Topological Space" ]
[ "Definition:First-Countable Space", "Definition:First-Countable Space", "Definition:Local Basis", "Definition:Character of Point in Topological Space", "Definition:Character of Topological Space", "Definition:Character of Topological Space", "Definition:Character of Point in Topological Space", "Defin...
proofwiki-10810
Difference of Two Powers/Examples/Difference of Two Cubes
:$x^3 - y^3 = \paren {x - y} \paren {x^2 + x y + y^2}$
From Difference of Two Powers: :$\ds a^n - b^n = \paren {a - b} \sum_{j \mathop = 0}^{n - 1} a^{n - j - 1} b^j$ The result follows directly by setting $n = 3$. {{qed}}
:$x^3 - y^3 = \paren {x - y} \paren {x^2 + x y + y^2}$
From [[Difference of Two Powers]]: :$\ds a^n - b^n = \paren {a - b} \sum_{j \mathop = 0}^{n - 1} a^{n - j - 1} b^j$ The result follows directly by setting $n = 3$. {{qed}}
Difference of Two Powers/Examples/Difference of Two Cubes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Difference_of_Two_Powers/Examples/Difference_of_Two_Cubes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Difference_of_Two_Powers/Examples/Difference_of_Two_Cubes
[ "Third Powers", "Difference of Two Cubes", "Examples of Use of Difference of Two Powers" ]
[]
[ "Difference of Two Powers" ]
proofwiki-10811
Existence of Subfamily of Cardinality not greater than Weight of Space and Unions Equal
Let $T$ be a topological space. Let $\FF$ be a set of open sets of $T$. There exists a subset $\GG \subseteq \FF$ such that: :$\ds \bigcup \GG = \bigcup \FF$ and: :$\card \GG \le \map w T$ where: :$\map w T$ denotes the weight of $T$ :$\card \GG$ denotes the cardinality of $\GG$.
By definition of weight of $T$ there exists a basis $\BB$ of $T$ such that: :$(1): \quad \card \BB = \map w T$ Let: :$\BB_1 = \set {W \in \BB: \exists U \in \FF: W \subseteq U}$ By definition of subset: :$\BB_1 \subseteq \BB$ Then by Subset implies Cardinal Inequality: :$(2): \quad \card {\BB_1} \le \card \BB$ By defin...
Let $T$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $\FF$ be a [[Definition:Set of Sets|set]] of [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open sets]] of $T$. There exists a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] $\GG \subseteq \FF$ such that: :$\ds \bigcup \GG = \bigcup \FF$ and: :$\card \GG \le \map w T$ where: :$\...
By definition of [[Definition:Weight of Topological Space|weight]] of $T$ there exists a [[Definition:Analytic Basis|basis]] $\BB$ of $T$ such that: :$(1): \quad \card \BB = \map w T$ Let: :$\BB_1 = \set {W \in \BB: \exists U \in \FF: W \subseteq U}$ By definition of [[Definition:Subset|subset]]: :$\BB_1 \subseteq \B...
Existence of Subfamily of Cardinality not greater than Weight of Space and Unions Equal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Existence_of_Subfamily_of_Cardinality_not_greater_than_Weight_of_Space_and_Unions_Equal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Existence_of_Subfamily_of_Cardinality_not_greater_than_Weight_of_Space_and_Unions_Equal
[ "Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Set of Sets", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Weight of Topological Space", "Definition:Cardinality" ]
[ "Definition:Weight of Topological Space", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis", "Definition:Subset", "Subset implies Cardinal Inequality", "Axiom:Axiom of Choice", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Mapping", "Definition:By Hypothesis", "Union of Subset of Family is...
proofwiki-10812
Set of Singletons is Smallest Basis of Discrete Space
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a discrete topological space. Let $\BB = \set {\set x : x \in S}$. Then $\BB$ is the smallest basis of $T$. That is: :$\BB$ is a basis of $T$ and: :for every basis $\CC$ of $T$, $\BB \subseteq \CC$.
By Basis for Discrete Topology $\BB$ is a basis of $T$. It remains to be shown that $\BB$ is the smallest basis of $T$. Let $\CC$ be a basis of $T$. Let $A \in \BB$. By definition of the set $\BB$: :$\exists x \in S: A = \set x$ By definition of basis: :$\exists B \in \CC: x \in B \subseteq A$ Then by Singleton of Elem...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Discrete Space|discrete]] [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $\BB = \set {\set x : x \in S}$. Then $\BB$ is the smallest [[Definition:Analytic Basis|basis]] of $T$. That is: :$\BB$ is a [[Definition:Analytic Basis|basis]] of $T$ and: :for every [[De...
By [[Basis for Discrete Topology]] $\BB$ is a [[Definition:Analytic Basis|basis]] of $T$. It remains to be shown that $\BB$ is the smallest [[Definition:Analytic Basis|basis]] of $T$. Let $\CC$ be a [[Definition:Analytic Basis|basis]] of $T$. Let $A \in \BB$. By definition of the set $\BB$: :$\exists x \in S: A = ...
Set of Singletons is Smallest Basis of Discrete Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_of_Singletons_is_Smallest_Basis_of_Discrete_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_of_Singletons_is_Smallest_Basis_of_Discrete_Space
[ "Discrete Topologies" ]
[ "Definition:Discrete Topology", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis" ]
[ "Basis for Discrete Topology", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis", "Singleton of Element is Subset", "Definition:Set Equality" ]
proofwiki-10813
Conditional and Inverse are not Equivalent
A conditional statement: :$p \implies q$ is not logically equivalent to its inverse: :$\lnot p \implies \lnot q$
We apply the Method of Truth Tables to the proposition: :$\paren {p \implies q} \iff \paren {\lnot p \implies \lnot q}$ $\begin{array}{|ccc|c|ccc|} \hline p & \implies & q) & \iff & (\lnot & p & \implies & \lnot & q) \\ \hline \F & \T & \F & \T & \T & \F & \T & \T & \F \\ \F & \T & \T & \F & \T & \F & \F & \F & \T \\ \...
A [[Definition:Conditional|conditional statement]]: :$p \implies q$ is not [[Definition:Logical Equivalence|logically equivalent]] to its [[Definition:Inverse Statement|inverse]]: :$\lnot p \implies \lnot q$
We apply the [[Method of Truth Tables]] to the proposition: :$\paren {p \implies q} \iff \paren {\lnot p \implies \lnot q}$ $\begin{array}{|ccc|c|ccc|} \hline p & \implies & q) & \iff & (\lnot & p & \implies & \lnot & q) \\ \hline \F & \T & \F & \T & \T & \F & \T & \T & \F \\ \F & \T & \T & \F & \T & \F & \F & \F & \T...
Conditional and Inverse are not Equivalent
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Conditional_and_Inverse_are_not_Equivalent
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Conditional_and_Inverse_are_not_Equivalent
[ "Conditional" ]
[ "Definition:Conditional", "Definition:Logical Equivalence", "Definition:Inverse Statement" ]
[ "Method of Truth Tables", "Definition:Truth Value", "Definition:Main Connective/Propositional Logic", "Definition:Boolean Interpretation" ]
proofwiki-10814
Weight of Discrete Topology equals Cardinality of Space
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a discrete topological space. Then: :$\map w T = \size S$ where: :$\map w T$ denotes the weight of $T$ :$\card S$ denotes the cardinality of $S$.
By Basis for Discrete Topology the set $\BB = \set {\set x: x \in S}$ is a basis of $T$. By Set of Singletons is Smallest Basis of Discrete Space $\BB$ is smallest basis of $T$: :for every basis $\CC$ of $T$, $\BB \subseteq \CC$. Then by Subset implies Cardinal Inequality: :for every basis $\CC$ of $T$, $\card \BB \le ...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Discrete Space|discrete]] [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Then: :$\map w T = \size S$ where: :$\map w T$ denotes the [[Definition:Weight of Topological Space|weight]] of $T$ :$\card S$ denotes the [[Definition:Cardinality|cardinality]] of $S$.
By [[Basis for Discrete Topology]] the set $\BB = \set {\set x: x \in S}$ is a [[Definition:Analytic Basis|basis]] of $T$. By [[Set of Singletons is Smallest Basis of Discrete Space]] $\BB$ is smallest [[Definition:Analytic Basis|basis]] of $T$: :for every [[Definition:Analytic Basis|basis]] $\CC$ of $T$, $\BB \subset...
Weight of Discrete Topology equals Cardinality of Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Weight_of_Discrete_Topology_equals_Cardinality_of_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Weight_of_Discrete_Topology_equals_Cardinality_of_Space
[ "Discrete Topologies", "Weights of Topological Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Discrete Topology", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Weight of Topological Space", "Definition:Cardinality" ]
[ "Basis for Discrete Topology", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis", "Set of Singletons is Smallest Basis of Discrete Space", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis", "Subset implies Cardinal Inequality", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Ba...
proofwiki-10815
Cardinality of Set of Singletons
Let $S$ be a set. Let $T = \set {\set x: x \in S}$ be the set of all singletons of elements of $S$. Then: :$\card T = \card S$ where $\card S$ denotes the cardinality of $S$.
Define a mapping $f: S \to T$: :$\forall x \in S: \map f x = \set x$ By Singleton Equality: :$\forall x, y \in S: \map f x = \map f y \implies x = y$ Then, by definition, $f$ is an injection. By the definition of set $T$: :$\forall y \in T: \exists x \in S: y = \map f x$ Then, by definition, $f$ is a surjection. Hence,...
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. Let $T = \set {\set x: x \in S}$ be the [[Definition:Set|set]] of all [[Definition:Singleton|singletons]] of [[Definition:Element|elements]] of $S$. Then: :$\card T = \card S$ where $\card S$ denotes the [[Definition:Cardinality|cardinality]] of $S$.
Define a mapping $f: S \to T$: :$\forall x \in S: \map f x = \set x$ By [[Singleton Equality]]: :$\forall x, y \in S: \map f x = \map f y \implies x = y$ Then, by definition, $f$ is an [[Definition:Injection|injection]]. By the definition of set $T$: :$\forall y \in T: \exists x \in S: y = \map f x$ Then, by defini...
Cardinality of Set of Singletons
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cardinality_of_Set_of_Singletons
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cardinality_of_Set_of_Singletons
[ "Cardinals" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Singleton", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Cardinality" ]
[ "Singleton Equality", "Definition:Injection", "Definition:Surjection", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Set Equivalence", "Definition:Cardinality" ]
proofwiki-10816
Basis has Subset Basis of Cardinality equal to Weight of Space
Let $T = \struct {X, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $\BB$ be a basis of $T$. Then there exists a basis $\BB_0$ of $T$ such that :$\BB_0 \subseteq \BB$ and $\card {\BB_0} = \map w T$ where: :$\card {\BB_0}$ denotes the cardinality of $\BB_0$ :$\map w T$ denotes the weight of $T$.
There are two cases: :infinite weight :finite weight.
Let $T = \struct {X, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $\BB$ be a [[Definition:Analytic Basis|basis]] of $T$. Then there exists a [[Definition:Analytic Basis|basis]] $\BB_0$ of $T$ such that :$\BB_0 \subseteq \BB$ and $\card {\BB_0} = \map w T$ where: :$\card {\BB_0}$ denotes the [...
There are two cases: :[[Definition:Infinite Set|infinite]] [[Definition:Weight of Topological Space|weight]] :[[Definition:Finite Set|finite]] [[Definition:Weight of Topological Space|weight]].
Basis has Subset Basis of Cardinality equal to Weight of Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Basis_has_Subset_Basis_of_Cardinality_equal_to_Weight_of_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Basis_has_Subset_Basis_of_Cardinality_equal_to_Weight_of_Space
[ "Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis", "Definition:Cardinality", "Definition:Weight of Topological Space" ]
[ "Definition:Infinite Set", "Definition:Weight of Topological Space", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Weight of Topological Space", "Definition:Infinite Set", "Definition:Weight of Topological Space", "Definition:Weight of Topological Space", "Definition:Weight of Topological Space", "Definition...
proofwiki-10817
Cardinality of Union not greater than Product
Let $\FF$ be a set of sets. Let: :$\size \FF \le \mathbf m$ where :$\size \FF$ denotes the cardinality of $\FF$ :$\mathbf m$ is cardinal number (possibly infinite). Let: :$\forall A \in \FF: \size A \le \mathbf n$ where :$\mathbf n$ is cardinal number (possibly infinite). Then: :$\ds \size {\bigcup \FF} \le \size {\ma...
$\FF = \O$ or $\FF = \set \O$ or $\O \ne \FF \ne \set \O$. In case when $\FF = \O$ or $\FF = \set \O$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \size {\bigcup \FF} | r = \size \O | c = Union of Empty Set, Union of Singleton }} {{eqn | o = \le | r = \size {\mathbf m \times \mathbf n} | c = Subset implies Cardin...
Let $\FF$ be a [[Definition:Set of Sets|set of sets]]. Let: :$\size \FF \le \mathbf m$ where :$\size \FF$ denotes the [[Definition:Cardinality|cardinality]] of $\FF$ :$\mathbf m$ is [[Definition:Cardinal Number|cardinal number]] (possibly [[Definition:Infinite Set|infinite]]). Let: :$\forall A \in \FF: \size A \le \...
$\FF = \O$ or $\FF = \set \O$ or $\O \ne \FF \ne \set \O$. In case when $\FF = \O$ or $\FF = \set \O$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \size {\bigcup \FF} | r = \size \O | c = [[Union of Empty Set]], [[Union of Singleton]] }} {{eqn | o = \le | r = \size {\mathbf m \times \mathbf n} | c = [[Subset imp...
Cardinality of Union not greater than Product
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cardinality_of_Union_not_greater_than_Product
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cardinality_of_Union_not_greater_than_Product
[ "Cardinals", "Set Union", "Cardinality" ]
[ "Definition:Set of Sets", "Definition:Cardinality", "Definition:Cardinal Number", "Definition:Infinite Set", "Definition:Cardinal Number", "Definition:Infinite Set" ]
[ "Union of Empty Set", "Union of Singleton", "Subset implies Cardinal Inequality", "Empty Set is Subset of All Sets", "Surjection iff Cardinal Inequality", "Cardinal of Cardinal Equal to Cardinal", "Surjection iff Cardinal Inequality", "Definition:Surjection", "Definition:Surjection", "Definition:S...
proofwiki-10818
Image of Mapping of Intersections is Smallest Basis
Let $T = \struct {X, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $f: X \to \tau$ be a mapping such that: :$\forall x \in X: \paren {x \in \map f x \land \forall U \in \tau: x \in U \implies \map f x \subseteq U}$. Then the image $\Img f$ is subset of every basis of $T$.
Let $\BB$ be a basis. Let $V \in \Img f$. Then by definition of image there exists a point $b \in X$ such that: :$V = \map f b$ Then $V$ is open because $\Img f \subseteq \tau$. By assumption of mapping $f$: :$b \in V$ Then by definition of basis there exists a subset $U \in \BB$ such that: :$b \in U \subseteq V$ By de...
Let $T = \struct {X, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $f: X \to \tau$ be a mapping such that: :$\forall x \in X: \paren {x \in \map f x \land \forall U \in \tau: x \in U \implies \map f x \subseteq U}$. Then the [[Definition:Image of Mapping|image]] $\Img f$ is subset of every [[Def...
Let $\BB$ be a [[Definition:Analytic Basis|basis]]. Let $V \in \Img f$. Then by definition of [[Definition:Image of Mapping|image]] there exists a [[Definition:Element|point]] $b \in X$ such that: :$V = \map f b$ Then $V$ is [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open]] because $\Img f \subseteq \tau$. By assumption of m...
Image of Mapping of Intersections is Smallest Basis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Image_of_Mapping_of_Intersections_is_Smallest_Basis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Image_of_Mapping_of_Intersections_is_Smallest_Basis
[ "Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Mapping", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis" ]
[ "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis", "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Mapping", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Set Equality" ]
proofwiki-10819
Cardinality of Image of Mapping of Intersections is not greater than Weight of Space
Let $T = \struct {X, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $f: X \to \tau$ be a mapping such that: :$\forall x \in X: \paren {x \in \map f x \land \forall U \in \tau: x \in U \implies \map f x \subseteq U}$ Then the cardinality of the image of $f$ is no greater than the weight of $T$: :$\card {\Img f} \le \map w T$
By definition of weight, there exists a basis $\BB$ of $T$ such that: :$\card \BB = \map w T$ By Image of Mapping of Intersections is Smallest Basis: :$\Img f \subseteq \BB$ Thus by Subset implies Cardinal Inequality: :$\card {\Img f} \le \card \BB = \map w T$ {{qed}}
Let $T = \struct {X, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $f: X \to \tau$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]] such that: :$\forall x \in X: \paren {x \in \map f x \land \forall U \in \tau: x \in U \implies \map f x \subseteq U}$ Then the [[Definition:Cardinality|cardinality]] of the [[D...
By definition of [[Definition:Weight of Topological Space|weight]], there exists a [[Definition:Analytic Basis|basis]] $\BB$ of $T$ such that: :$\card \BB = \map w T$ By [[Image of Mapping of Intersections is Smallest Basis]]: :$\Img f \subseteq \BB$ Thus by [[Subset implies Cardinal Inequality]]: :$\card {\Img f} \l...
Cardinality of Image of Mapping of Intersections is not greater than Weight of Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cardinality_of_Image_of_Mapping_of_Intersections_is_not_greater_than_Weight_of_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cardinality_of_Image_of_Mapping_of_Intersections_is_not_greater_than_Weight_of_Space
[ "Topology", "Cardinals" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Cardinality", "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Mapping", "Definition:Weight of Topological Space" ]
[ "Definition:Weight of Topological Space", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis", "Image of Mapping of Intersections is Smallest Basis", "Subset implies Cardinal Inequality" ]
proofwiki-10820
Finite Weight Space has Basis equal to Image of Mapping of Intersections
Let $T = \struct {X, \tau}$ be a topological space with finite weight. Then there exist a basis $\BB$ of $T$ and a mapping $f:X \to \tau$ such that: :$\BB = \Img f$ and :$\forall x \in X: \paren {x \in \map f x \land \forall U \in \tau: x \in U \implies \map f x \subseteq U}$ where $\Img f$ denotes the image of $f$.
By definition of weight there exists a basis $\BB$ such that: :$\card \BB = \map w T$ where: :$\map w T$ denotes the weight of $T$ :$\card \BB$ denotes the cardinality of $\BB$. By assumption that weight is finite: :$\card \BB$ is finite Then by Cardinality of Set is Finite iff Set is Finite: :$\BB$ is finite Define a ...
Let $T = \struct {X, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]] with [[Definition:Finite Set|finite]] [[Definition:Weight of Topological Space|weight]]. Then there exist a [[Definition:Analytic Basis|basis]] $\BB$ of $T$ and a mapping $f:X \to \tau$ such that: :$\BB = \Img f$ and :$\forall x \in X:...
By definition of [[Definition:Weight of Topological Space|weight]] there exists a [[Definition:Analytic Basis|basis]] $\BB$ such that: :$\card \BB = \map w T$ where: :$\map w T$ denotes the [[Definition:Weight of Topological Space|weight]] of $T$ :$\card \BB$ denotes the [[Definition:Cardinality|cardinality]] of $\BB$....
Finite Weight Space has Basis equal to Image of Mapping of Intersections
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Finite_Weight_Space_has_Basis_equal_to_Image_of_Mapping_of_Intersections
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Finite_Weight_Space_has_Basis_equal_to_Image_of_Mapping_of_Intersections
[ "Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Weight of Topological Space", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis", "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Mapping" ]
[ "Definition:Weight of Topological Space", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis", "Definition:Weight of Topological Space", "Definition:Cardinality", "Cardinality of Set is Finite iff Set is Finite", "Definition:Subset", "Subset of Finite Set is Finite", "General Intersection Property of Topolog...
proofwiki-10821
Rubik's Cube has 54 Facets
Let $S$ be the set of facets of Rubik's cube. Then the cardinality of $S$ is given by: :$\card S = 54$ That is: :A Rubik's cube has $54$ facets.
A cube, by definition, has $6$ faces. Each face is subdivided into $9$ facets. Hence there are $6 \times 9 = 54$ facets in total. {{qed}}
Let $S$ be the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Facet of Rubik's Cube|facets]] of [[Definition:Rubik's Cube|Rubik's cube]]. Then the [[Definition:Cardinality of Finite Set|cardinality]] of $S$ is given by: :$\card S = 54$ That is: :A [[Definition:Rubik's Cube|Rubik's cube]] has $54$ [[Definition:Facet of Rubik...
A [[Definition:Cube (Geometry)|cube]], by definition, has $6$ [[Definition:Face of Polyhedron|faces]]. Each [[Definition:Face of Polyhedron|face]] is subdivided into $9$ [[Definition:Facet of Rubik's Cube|facets]]. Hence there are $6 \times 9 = 54$ [[Definition:Facet of Rubik's Cube|facets]] in total. {{qed}}
Rubik's Cube has 54 Facets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rubik's_Cube_has_54_Facets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rubik's_Cube_has_54_Facets
[ "Rubik's Cube" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Rubik's Cube/Facet", "Definition:Rubik's Cube", "Definition:Cardinality/Finite", "Definition:Rubik's Cube", "Definition:Rubik's Cube/Facet" ]
[ "Definition:Cube/Geometry", "Definition:Polyhedron/Face", "Definition:Polyhedron/Face", "Definition:Rubik's Cube/Facet", "Definition:Rubik's Cube/Facet" ]
proofwiki-10822
Equivalence of Definitions of Symmetric Difference/(3) iff (5)
Let $S$ and $T$ be sets. {{TFAENocat|def = Symmetric Difference|view = symmetric difference $S \symdif T$ between $S$ and $T$}}
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = x \in S \symdif T }} {{eqn | o = \leadstoandfrom | r = x \in S \oplus x \in T | c = {{Defof|Symmetric Difference|index = 5}} }} {{eqn | r = \paren {\neg \paren {x \in S} \land \paren {x \in T} } \lor \paren {\paren {x \in S} \land \neg \paren {x \in T} } | o = \l...
Let $S$ and $T$ be [[Definition:Set|sets]]. {{TFAENocat|def = Symmetric Difference|view = symmetric difference $S \symdif T$ between $S$ and $T$}}
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = x \in S \symdif T }} {{eqn | o = \leadstoandfrom | r = x \in S \oplus x \in T | c = {{Defof|Symmetric Difference|index = 5}} }} {{eqn | r = \paren {\neg \paren {x \in S} \land \paren {x \in T} } \lor \paren {\paren {x \in S} \land \neg \paren {x \in T} } | o = \l...
Equivalence of Definitions of Symmetric Difference/(3) iff (5)
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Symmetric_Difference/(3)_iff_(5)
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Symmetric_Difference/(3)_iff_(5)
[ "Equivalence of Definitions of Symmetric Difference" ]
[ "Definition:Set" ]
[ "Non-Equivalence as Disjunction of Conjunctions", "Union is Commutative", "Definition:Set Equality" ]
proofwiki-10823
Equivalence of Definitions of Symmetric Difference/(2) iff (5)
Let $S$ and $T$ be sets. {{TFAENocat|def = Symmetric Difference|view = symmetric difference $S \symdif T$ between $S$ and $T$}}
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = x \in S \symdif T }} {{eqn | o = \leadstoandfrom | r = x \in S \oplus x \in T | c = {{Defof|Symmetric Difference|index = 5}} }} {{eqn | r = \paren {x \in S \lor x \in T} \land \neg \paren {x \in S \land x \in T} | o = \leadstoandfrom | c = {{Defof|Exclusiv...
Let $S$ and $T$ be [[Definition:Set|sets]]. {{TFAENocat|def = Symmetric Difference|view = symmetric difference $S \symdif T$ between $S$ and $T$}}
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = x \in S \symdif T }} {{eqn | o = \leadstoandfrom | r = x \in S \oplus x \in T | c = {{Defof|Symmetric Difference|index = 5}} }} {{eqn | r = \paren {x \in S \lor x \in T} \land \neg \paren {x \in S \land x \in T} | o = \leadstoandfrom | c = {{Defof|Exclusiv...
Equivalence of Definitions of Symmetric Difference/(2) iff (5)
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Symmetric_Difference/(2)_iff_(5)
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Symmetric_Difference/(2)_iff_(5)
[ "Equivalence of Definitions of Symmetric Difference" ]
[ "Definition:Set" ]
[ "Definition:Set Equality" ]
proofwiki-10824
Partition of Facets of Rubik's Cube
Let $S$ denote the set of the facets of Rukik's cube. Then $S$ can be partitioned as follows: :$S = \set {S_C \mid S_E \mid S_Z}$ where: :$S_C$ denotes the set of corner facets :$S_E$ denotes the set of edge facets :$S_Z$ denotes the set of center facets.
From the definition of the facets, each face is divided into $9$ facets. :600px A facet is either: :on the corner of a face, for example $flu$, $fru$ :on the edge of a face, for example $fu$, $fr$ :in the center of a face, for example $F$. :$(1):\quad$ Each facet can be either in $S_C$ or $S_E$ or $S_Z$ and can not be ...
Let $S$ denote the [[Definition:Set|set]] of the [[Definition:Facet of Rubik's Cube|facets]] of [[Definition:Rubik's Cube|Rukik's cube]]. Then $S$ can be [[Definition:Set Partition|partitioned]] as follows: :$S = \set {S_C \mid S_E \mid S_Z}$ where: :$S_C$ denotes the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Corner Face...
From the definition of the [[Definition:Facet of Rubik's Cube|facets]], each [[Definition:Face of Rubik's Cube|face]] is divided into $9$ [[Definition:Facet of Rubik's Cube|facets]]. :[[File:RubiksCubeFacets.png|600px]] A [[Definition:Facet of Rubik's Cube|facet]] is either: :on the corner of a [[Definition:Face of R...
Partition of Facets of Rubik's Cube
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Partition_of_Facets_of_Rubik's_Cube
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Partition_of_Facets_of_Rubik's_Cube
[ "Rubik's Cube" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Rubik's Cube/Facet", "Definition:Rubik's Cube", "Definition:Set Partition", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Rubik's Cube/Corner Facet", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Rubik's Cube/Edge Facet", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Rubik's Cube/Center Facet" ]
[ "Definition:Rubik's Cube/Facet", "Definition:Rubik's Cube/Face", "Definition:Rubik's Cube/Facet", "File:RubiksCubeFacets.png", "Definition:Rubik's Cube/Facet", "Definition:Rubik's Cube/Face", "Definition:Rubik's Cube/Face", "Definition:Rubik's Cube/Face", "Definition:Rubik's Cube/Facet", "Definiti...
proofwiki-10825
Even and Odd Integers form Partition of Integers
The odd integers and even integers form a partition of the integers.
Let $n \in \Z$ be an integer. Let $\Bbb O$ be the set of odd integers and $\Bbb E$ be the set of even integers. By the Division Theorem: :$\forall n \in \Z: \exists! q, r \in \Z: n = 2 q + r, 0 \le r < 2$ from which it follows that either: :$n = 2 q \in \Bbb E$ or: :$n = 2 q + 1 \in \Bbb O$ Thus: :$(1): \quad$ each ele...
The [[Definition:Odd Integer|odd integers]] and [[Definition:Even Integer|even integers]] form a [[Definition:Set Partition|partition]] of the [[Definition:Integer|integers]].
Let $n \in \Z$ be an [[Definition:Integer|integer]]. Let $\Bbb O$ be the set of [[Definition:Odd Integer|odd integers]] and $\Bbb E$ be the set of [[Definition:Even Integer|even integers]]. By the [[Division Theorem]]: :$\forall n \in \Z: \exists! q, r \in \Z: n = 2 q + r, 0 \le r < 2$ from which it follows that eit...
Even and Odd Integers form Partition of Integers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Even_and_Odd_Integers_form_Partition_of_Integers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Even_and_Odd_Integers_form_Partition_of_Integers
[ "Set Partitions", "Odd Integers", "Even Integers", "Integers", "2" ]
[ "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Even Integer", "Definition:Set Partition", "Definition:Integer" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Even Integer", "Division Theorem", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Empty Set", "Definition:Set Partition" ]
proofwiki-10826
Analog between Logic and Set Theory
The concepts of set theory have directly corresponding concepts in logic: :{| border = "1" |- ! style="padding: 2px 10px" | Set Theory ! style="padding: 2px 10px" | Logic |- | align="left" style="padding: 2px 10px"| Set: $S, T$ | align="left" style="padding: 2px 10px"| Statement: $p, q$ |- | align="left" style="padding...
Let $P$ and $Q$ be propositional functions. Let $S$ and $T$ be subsets of a universe $\Bbb U$ such that: :$S = \set {x \in \Bbb U: \map P x}$ :$T = \set {x \in \Bbb U: \map Q x}$ By the following definitions: {{begin-axiom}} {{axiom | n = 1 | lc= Intersection: | ml= S \cap T | mo= := | m...
The concepts of [[Definition:Set Theory|set theory]] have directly corresponding concepts in [[Definition:Logic|logic]]: :{| border = "1" |- ! style="padding: 2px 10px" | Set Theory ! style="padding: 2px 10px" | Logic |- | align="left" style="padding: 2px 10px"| [[Definition:Set|Set]]: $S, T$ | align="left" style="pad...
Let $P$ and $Q$ be [[Definition:Propositional Function|propositional functions]]. Let $S$ and $T$ be [[Definition:Subset|subsets]] of a [[Definition:Universal Set|universe]] $\Bbb U$ such that: :$S = \set {x \in \Bbb U: \map P x}$ :$T = \set {x \in \Bbb U: \map Q x}$ By the following definitions: {{begin-axiom}} {{...
Analog between Logic and Set Theory
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Analog_between_Logic_and_Set_Theory
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Analog_between_Logic_and_Set_Theory
[ "Set Theory", "Logic" ]
[ "Definition:Set Theory", "Definition:Logic", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Statement", "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Disjunction", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Conjunction", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Conditional", "Definition:Symmetric Difference", "Definition:Exclus...
[ "Definition:Propositional Function", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Universal Set", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Symmetric Difference", "Definition:Set Complement", "Definition:Set Equality" ]
proofwiki-10827
Euler Phi Function of 1
:$\map \phi 1 = 1$
The only (strictly) positive integer less than or equal to $1$ is $1$ itself. By Integer is Coprime to 1, $1$ is coprime to itself. Hence, by definition, there is exactly $1$ integer less than or equal to $1$ which is coprime with $1$. Hence the result. {{qed}}
:$\map \phi 1 = 1$
The only [[Definition:Strictly Positive Integer|(strictly) positive integer]] less than or equal to $1$ is $1$ itself. By [[Integer is Coprime to 1]], $1$ is [[Definition:Coprime Integers|coprime]] to itself. Hence, by definition, there is exactly $1$ [[Definition:Integer|integer]] less than or equal to $1$ which is ...
Euler Phi Function of 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Euler_Phi_Function_of_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Euler_Phi_Function_of_1
[ "Examples of Euler Phi Function", "1" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Strictly Positive/Integer", "Integer is Coprime to 1", "Definition:Coprime/Integers", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Coprime/Integers" ]
proofwiki-10828
Cardinality of Set is Finite iff Set is Finite
Let $A$ be a set. :$\card A$ is finite {{iff}}: :$A$ is finite where $\card A$ denotes the cardinality of $A$.
Definition of cardinal: :$(1): \quad \card A \sim A$ :$\card A$ is finite {{iff}}: :$\exists n \in \N: \card A \sim \N_n$ by definition of finite set {{iff}}: :$\exists n \in \N: A \sim \N_n$ by $(1)$ and Set Equivalence behaves like Equivalence Relation {{iff}}: :$A$ is finite by definition of finite set. {{qed}}
Let $A$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. :$\card A$ is [[Definition:Finite Set|finite]] {{iff}}: :$A$ is [[Definition:Finite Set|finite]] where $\card A$ denotes the [[Definition:Cardinality|cardinality]] of $A$.
Definition of [[Definition:Cardinal|cardinal]]: :$(1): \quad \card A \sim A$ :$\card A$ is [[Definition:Finite Set|finite]] {{iff}}: :$\exists n \in \N: \card A \sim \N_n$ by definition of [[Definition:Finite Set|finite set]] {{iff}}: :$\exists n \in \N: A \sim \N_n$ by $(1)$ and [[Set Equivalence behaves like Equiv...
Cardinality of Set is Finite iff Set is Finite
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cardinality_of_Set_is_Finite_iff_Set_is_Finite
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cardinality_of_Set_is_Finite_iff_Set_is_Finite
[ "Cardinals" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Cardinality" ]
[ "Definition:Cardinal", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Finite Set", "Set Equivalence behaves like Equivalence Relation", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Finite Set" ]
proofwiki-10829
Multiplication using Parabola
:500pxrightthumb Let the parabola $P$ defined as $y = x^2$ be plotted on the Cartesian plane. Let $A = \tuple {x_a, y_a}$ and $B = \tuple {x_b, y_b}$ be points on the curve $\map f x$ so that $x_a < x_b$. Then the line segment joining $A B$ will cross the $y$-axis at $-x_a x_b$. Thus $P$ can be used as a nomogram to ca...
Let $\map f x = x^2$. Then: :$\map f {x_a} = x_a^2$ and: :$\map f {x_b} = x_b^2$ Then the slope $m$ of the line segment joining $A B$ will be: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = m | r = \frac {x_b^2 - x_a^2} {x_b - x_a} | c = Equation of Straight Line in Plane: Point-Slope Form }} {{eqn | r = \frac {\paren {x_b - x...
:[[File:Multiplication-using-Parabola.png|500px|right|thumb]] Let the [[Definition:Parabola|parabola]] $P$ defined as $y = x^2$ be plotted on the [[Definition:Cartesian Plane|Cartesian plane]]. Let $A = \tuple {x_a, y_a}$ and $B = \tuple {x_b, y_b}$ be [[Definition:Point|points]] on the curve $\map f x$ so that $x_a...
Let $\map f x = x^2$. Then: :$\map f {x_a} = x_a^2$ and: :$\map f {x_b} = x_b^2$ Then the [[Definition:Slope of Straight Line|slope]] $m$ of the [[Definition:Line Segment|line segment]] joining $A B$ will be: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = m | r = \frac {x_b^2 - x_a^2} {x_b - x_a} | c = [[Equation of Str...
Multiplication using Parabola
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Multiplication_using_Parabola
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Multiplication_using_Parabola
[ "Multiplication", "Parabolas", "Nomograms" ]
[ "File:Multiplication-using-Parabola.png", "Definition:Parabola", "Definition:Cartesian Plane", "Definition:Point", "Definition:Line/Segment", "Definition:Axis/Y-Axis", "Definition:Nomogram", "Definition:Multiplication/Real Numbers", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Axis/X-Axis", "Definition...
[ "Definition:Slope/Straight Line", "Definition:Line/Segment", "Equation of Straight Line in Plane/Point-Slope Form", "Difference of Two Squares", "Equation of Straight Line in Plane/Slope-Intercept Form", "Definition:Intercept", "Definition:Coordinate System/Coordinate" ]
proofwiki-10830
Equivalence of Definitions of Countably Infinite Set
Let $S$ be a set. {{TFAE|def = Countably Infinite Set}}
From Integers are Countably Infinite there is a bijection between $\Z$, the set of integers, and $\N$, the set of natural numbers. Let $h: \N \to \Z$ be such a bijection. Let $f: S \to \N$ be a bijection. From Composite of Bijections is Bijection: :$h \circ f: S \to \Z$ is a bijection. Similarly, let $g: S \to \Z$ be a...
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. {{TFAE|def = Countably Infinite Set}}
From [[Integers are Countably Infinite]] there is a [[Definition:Bijection|bijection]] between $\Z$, the [[Definition:Integer|set of integers]], and $\N$, the [[Definition:Natural Numbers|set of natural numbers]]. Let $h: \N \to \Z$ be such a [[Definition:Bijection|bijection]]. Let $f: S \to \N$ be a [[Definition:Bi...
Equivalence of Definitions of Countably Infinite Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Countably_Infinite_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Countably_Infinite_Set
[ "Countable Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Set" ]
[ "Integers are Countably Infinite", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Bijection", "Composite of Bijections is Bijection", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Bijection", "Inverse of Bijection is Bijection", "Definition:...
proofwiki-10831
Set of Odd Integers is Countably Infinite
Let $\Bbb O$ be the set of odd integers. Then $\Bbb O$ is countably infinite.
Let $f: \Bbb O \to \Z$ be the mapping defined as: :$\forall x \in \Bbb O: \map f x = \dfrac {x + 1} 2$ $f$ is well-defined as $x + 1$ is even and so $\dfrac {x + 1} 2 \in \Z$. Let $x, y \in \Bbb O$ such that $\map f x = \map f y$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map f x | r = \map f y | c = }} {{eqn | ll=...
Let $\Bbb O$ be the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Odd Integer|odd integers]]. Then $\Bbb O$ is [[Definition:Countably Infinite Set|countably infinite]].
Let $f: \Bbb O \to \Z$ be the [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]] defined as: :$\forall x \in \Bbb O: \map f x = \dfrac {x + 1} 2$ $f$ is [[Definition:Well-Defined Mapping|well-defined]] as $x + 1$ is [[Definition:Even Integer|even]] and so $\dfrac {x + 1} 2 \in \Z$. Let $x, y \in \Bbb O$ such that $\map f x = \map f y$. ...
Set of Odd Integers is Countably Infinite
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_of_Odd_Integers_is_Countably_Infinite
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_of_Odd_Integers_is_Countably_Infinite
[ "Countable Sets", "Odd Integers" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Countably Infinite/Set" ]
[ "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Well-Defined/Mapping", "Definition:Even Integer", "Definition:Injection", "Definition:Inverse of Mapping", "Definition:Well-Defined/Mapping", "Definition:odd Integer", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Injection", "Cantor-Bernstein-Schröder Theorem", "Definition...
proofwiki-10832
Unique Readability for Prefix Notation
Let $\AA$ be an alphabet. Then prefix notation for $\AA$ has the unique readability property.
Let $\phi$ be a WFF of prefix notation for $\AA$. Apply the Principle of Mathematical Induction on the length of $\phi$ to prove: :$(1): \quad$ No prefix of $\phi$ is a WFF, except $\phi$ itself; :$(2): \quad$ If the first symbol of $\phi$ has arity $n$, then there exist unique WFFs $\phi_1, \ldots, \phi_n$ such that $...
Let $\AA$ be an [[Definition:Alphabet of Formal Language|alphabet]]. Then [[Definition:Prefix Notation|prefix notation]] for $\AA$ has the [[Definition:Unique Readability Property|unique readability property]].
Let $\phi$ be a [[Definition:WFF|WFF]] of [[Definition:Prefix Notation|prefix notation]] for $\AA$. Apply the [[Principle of Mathematical Induction]] on the [[Definition:Length of Sequence|length]] of $\phi$ to prove: :$(1): \quad$ No [[Definition:Prefix|prefix]] of $\phi$ is a [[Definition:WFF|WFF]], except $\phi$ i...
Unique Readability for Prefix Notation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Unique_Readability_for_Prefix_Notation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Unique_Readability_for_Prefix_Notation
[ "Prefix Notation", "Collations" ]
[ "Definition:Formal Language/Alphabet", "Definition:Operation/Binary Operation/Prefix Notation", "Definition:Collation/Unique Readability" ]
[ "Symbols:Abbreviations/W/WFF", "Definition:Operation/Binary Operation/Prefix Notation", "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Length of Sequence", "Definition:Prefix", "Symbols:Abbreviations/W/WFF", "Definition:Symbol", "Definition:Operation/Arity", "Definition:Unique", "Symbols:Abbre...
proofwiki-10833
Identity Matrix is Permutation Matrix
An identity matrix is an example of a permutation matrix.
An identity matrix, by definition, has instances of $1$ on the main diagonal and $0$ elsewhere. Each diagonal element is by definition on one row and one column of the matrix. Also by definition, each diagonal element is on a different row and column from each other diagonal element. The result follows by definition o...
An [[Definition:Identity Matrix|identity matrix]] is an example of a [[Definition:Permutation Matrix|permutation matrix]].
An [[Definition:Identity Matrix|identity matrix]], by definition, has instances of $1$ on the [[Definition:Main Diagonal|main diagonal]] and $0$ elsewhere. Each [[Definition:Diagonal Element|diagonal element]] is by definition on one [[Definition:Row of Matrix|row]] and one [[Definition:Column of Matrix|column]] of th...
Identity Matrix is Permutation Matrix
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Identity_Matrix_is_Permutation_Matrix
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Identity_Matrix_is_Permutation_Matrix
[ "Unit Matrices", "Permutation Matrices" ]
[ "Definition:Unit Matrix", "Definition:Permutation Matrix" ]
[ "Definition:Unit Matrix", "Definition:Matrix/Diagonal/Main", "Definition:Main Diagonal/Diagonal Elements", "Definition:Matrix/Row", "Definition:Matrix/Column", "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix", "Definition:Main Diagonal/Diagonal Elements", "Definition:Matrix/Row", "Definition:Matrix/Column", "Def...
proofwiki-10834
Full Rook Matrix is Nonsingular
A full rook matrix is nonsingular.
Let $\mathbf A$ be a full rook matrix. By definition, $\mathbf A$ is an instance of a permutation matrix. By Determinant of Permutation Matrix, it follows that $\det \mathbf A = \pm 1$. By Matrix is Nonsingular iff Determinant has Multiplicative Inverse: :$\mathbf A$ is nonsingular. {{qed}}
A [[Definition:Full Rook Matrix|full rook matrix]] is [[Definition:Nonsingular Matrix|nonsingular]].
Let $\mathbf A$ be a [[Definition:Full Rook Matrix|full rook matrix]]. By definition, $\mathbf A$ is an instance of a [[Definition:Permutation Matrix|permutation matrix]]. By [[Determinant of Permutation Matrix]], it follows that $\det \mathbf A = \pm 1$. By [[Matrix is Nonsingular iff Determinant has Multiplicative...
Full Rook Matrix is Nonsingular
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Full_Rook_Matrix_is_Nonsingular
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Full_Rook_Matrix_is_Nonsingular
[ "Full Rook Matrices", "Nonsingular Matrices" ]
[ "Definition:Full Rook Matrix", "Definition:Nonsingular Matrix" ]
[ "Definition:Full Rook Matrix", "Definition:Permutation Matrix", "Determinant of Permutation Matrix", "Matrix is Nonsingular iff Determinant has Multiplicative Inverse", "Definition:Nonsingular Matrix" ]
proofwiki-10835
Product of Rook Matrices is Rook Matrix
Let $\mathbf A$ and $\mathbf B$ be rook matrices. Their product $\mathbf {A B}$ is also a rook matrix.
An element $a b_{ij}$ of $\mathbf {A B}$ is formed by multiplying each element of row $i$ of $\mathbf A$ by its corresponding element of column $j$ of $\mathbf B$. No more than $1$ element of row $i$ equals $1$, and the rest equal $0$. No more than $1$ column $k$ of $\mathbf B$ contains $1$ in its $i$th element, and th...
Let $\mathbf A$ and $\mathbf B$ be [[Definition:Rook Matrix|rook matrices]]. Their [[Definition:Matrix Product (Conventional)|product]] $\mathbf {A B}$ is also a [[Definition:Rook Matrix|rook matrix]].
An [[Definition:Element of Matrix|element]] $a b_{ij}$ of $\mathbf {A B}$ is formed by [[Definition:Real Multiplication|multiplying]] each [[Definition:Element of Matrix|element]] of [[Definition:Row of Matrix|row]] $i$ of $\mathbf A$ by its corresponding [[Definition:Element of Matrix|element]] of [[Definition:Column ...
Product of Rook Matrices is Rook Matrix
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_of_Rook_Matrices_is_Rook_Matrix
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_of_Rook_Matrices_is_Rook_Matrix
[ "Rook Matrices" ]
[ "Definition:Rook Matrix", "Definition:Matrix Product (Conventional)", "Definition:Rook Matrix" ]
[ "Definition:Matrix/Element", "Definition:Multiplication/Real Numbers", "Definition:Matrix/Element", "Definition:Matrix/Row", "Definition:Matrix/Element", "Definition:Matrix/Column", "Definition:Matrix/Element", "Definition:Matrix/Row", "Definition:Matrix/Column", "Definition:Matrix/Element", "De...
proofwiki-10836
Topology Defined by Basis
Let $S$ be a set. Let $\BB$ be a set of subsets of $S$. Suppose that :$(\text B1): \quad \forall A_1, A_2 \in \BB: \forall x \in A_1 \cap A_2: \exists A \in \BB: x \in A \subseteq A_1 \cap A_2$ :$(\text B2): \quad \forall x \in X: \exists A \in \BB: x \in A$ ::$\tau = \set {\bigcup \GG: \GG \subseteq \BB}$ Then: :$T = ...
We have to prove Open Set Axioms:
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. Let $\BB$ be a [[Definition:Set of Sets|set]] of [[Definition:Subset|subsets]] of $S$. Suppose that :$(\text B1): \quad \forall A_1, A_2 \in \BB: \forall x \in A_1 \cap A_2: \exists A \in \BB: x \in A \subseteq A_1 \cap A_2$ :$(\text B2): \quad \forall x \in X: \exists A \in \BB: ...
We have to prove [[Axiom:Open Set Axioms|Open Set Axioms]]:
Topology Defined by Basis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Topology_Defined_by_Basis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Topology_Defined_by_Basis
[ "Topological Bases" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Set of Sets", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis" ]
[ "Axiom:Open Set Axioms", "Axiom:Open Set Axioms" ]
proofwiki-10837
Equivalence of Definitions of Singular Matrix
{{TFAE|def = Singular Matrix}} Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a ring with unity. Let $n \in \Z_{>0}$ be a (strictly) positive integer. Let $\mathbf A$ be an element of the ring of square matrices $\struct {\map {\MM_R} n, +, \times}$.
Follows directly from Matrix is Nonsingular iff Determinant has Multiplicative Inverse. {{qed}} Category:Singular Matrices avq5fidzrgypqx4rm6rl12cyoniwy22
{{TFAE|def = Singular Matrix}} Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Ring with Unity|ring with unity]]. Let $n \in \Z_{>0}$ be a [[Definition:Strictly Positive Integer|(strictly) positive integer]]. Let $\mathbf A$ be an [[Definition:Element|element]] of the [[Definition:Ring of Square Matrices|ring of squa...
Follows directly from [[Matrix is Nonsingular iff Determinant has Multiplicative Inverse]]. {{qed}} [[Category:Singular Matrices]] avq5fidzrgypqx4rm6rl12cyoniwy22
Equivalence of Definitions of Singular Matrix
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Singular_Matrix
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Singular_Matrix
[ "Singular Matrices" ]
[ "Definition:Ring with Unity", "Definition:Strictly Positive/Integer", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Ring of Square Matrices" ]
[ "Matrix is Nonsingular iff Determinant has Multiplicative Inverse", "Category:Singular Matrices" ]
proofwiki-10838
Matrix is Singular iff Product with Non-Zero Vector is Zero
Let $\mathbb F$ be a field. Let $\mathbf A$ be a square matrix of order $n$ over $\mathbb F$. Then $\mathbf A$ is singular {{iff}} there exists a vector $\mathbf v \in \mathbb F^n$: :$\mathbf v \ne \mathbf 0$ :$\mathbf A \mathbf v = \mathbf 0$ where $\mathbf 0$ is the zero vector.
=== Sufficient Case === Aiming for a Proof by Contraposition, suppose that :$\neg \exists \mathbf v \in \mathbb F^n : \mathbf v \neq \mathbf 0 \wedge \mathbf A \mathbf v = \mathbf 0$ Then, for any two vectors $\mathbf p, \mathbf q \in \mathbb F^n$, {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf A \mathbf p | r = \mathbf A \ma...
Let $\mathbb F$ be a [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]]. Let $\mathbf A$ be a [[Definition:Square Matrix|square matrix]] of [[Definition:Order of Square Matrix|order $n$]] over $\mathbb F$. Then $\mathbf A$ is [[Definition:Singular Matrix|singular]] {{iff}} there exists a [[Definition:Vector (Linear Algebr...
=== Sufficient Case === Aiming for a [[Proof by Contraposition]], suppose that :$\neg \exists \mathbf v \in \mathbb F^n : \mathbf v \neq \mathbf 0 \wedge \mathbf A \mathbf v = \mathbf 0$ Then, for any two [[Definition:Vector|vectors]] $\mathbf p, \mathbf q \in \mathbb F^n$, {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf A \mathb...
Matrix is Singular iff Product with Non-Zero Vector is Zero
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Matrix_is_Singular_iff_Product_with_Non-Zero_Vector_is_Zero
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Matrix_is_Singular_iff_Product_with_Non-Zero_Vector_is_Zero
[ "Singular Matrices", "Proofs by Contraposition" ]
[ "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix", "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix/Order", "Definition:Singular Matrix", "Definition:Vector/Linear Algebra", "Definition:Zero Vector" ]
[ "Proof by Contraposition", "Definition:Vector", "Matrix Multiplication Distributes over Matrix Addition", "Definition:Matrix Product", "Definition:Injection", "Definition:Block Multiplication", "Definition:Matrix Product", "Definition:Matrix/Column", "Definition:Vector Quantity/Component", "Defini...
proofwiki-10839
Equivalence of Definitions of Integer Congruence
Let $m \in \Z_{> 0}$. {{TFAE|def = Congruence Modulo Integer|view = congruence modulo $m$}}
Let $x_1, x_2, z \in \Z$. Let $x_1 \equiv x_2 \pmod z$ as defined by the equal remainder after division: :$\RR_z = \set {\tuple {x, y} \in \Z \times \Z: \exists k \in \Z: x = y + k z}$ Let $\tuple {x_1, x_2} \in \RR_z$. Then by definition: :$\exists k \in \Z: x_1 = x_2 + k z$ So, by definition of the modulo operation: ...
Let $m \in \Z_{> 0}$. {{TFAE|def = Congruence Modulo Integer|view = congruence modulo $m$}}
Let $x_1, x_2, z \in \Z$. Let $x_1 \equiv x_2 \pmod z$ as defined by the [[Definition:Congruence (Number Theory)/Integers/Remainder after Division|equal remainder after division]]: :$\RR_z = \set {\tuple {x, y} \in \Z \times \Z: \exists k \in \Z: x = y + k z}$ Let $\tuple {x_1, x_2} \in \RR_z$. Then by definition: ...
Equivalence of Definitions of Integer Congruence
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Integer_Congruence
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Integer_Congruence
[ "Modulo Arithmetic" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Congruence (Number Theory)/Integers/Remainder after Division", "Definition:Modulo Operation", "Definition:Congruence (Number Theory)/Integers/Modulo Operation", "Definition:Congruence (Number Theory)/Integers/Modulo Operation", "Definition:Congruence (Number Theory)/Integers/Integer Multiple", ...
proofwiki-10840
Occurrence in Prefix Notation has Unique Scope
Let $\FF$ be a formal language in prefix notation. Let $\mathbf A$ be a well-formed formula of $\FF$. Let $a$ be an occurrence in $\mathbf A$. Then $a$ has a unique scope.
From the formal definition of prefix notation, it follows that $a$ must be introduced by the rule of formation: :$a \mathbf A_1 \cdots \mathbf A_n$ for some well-formed formulas $\mathbf A_1, \ldots, \mathbf A_n$. By Unique Readability for Prefix Notation, the $\mathbf A_i$ are uniquely determined. Then $\mathbf A' = a...
Let $\FF$ be a [[Definition:Formal Language|formal language]] in [[Definition:Prefix Notation|prefix notation]]. Let $\mathbf A$ be a [[Definition:Well-Formed Formula|well-formed formula]] of $\FF$. Let $a$ be an [[Definition:Occurrence (Formal Systems)|occurrence]] in $\mathbf A$. Then $a$ has a unique [[Definitio...
From the [[Definition:Prefix Notation/Formal Definition|formal definition of prefix notation]], it follows that $a$ must be introduced by the [[Definition:Rule of Formation|rule of formation]]: :$a \mathbf A_1 \cdots \mathbf A_n$ for some [[Definition:Well-Formed Formula|well-formed formulas]] $\mathbf A_1, \ldots, \...
Occurrence in Prefix Notation has Unique Scope
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Occurrence_in_Prefix_Notation_has_Unique_Scope
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Occurrence_in_Prefix_Notation_has_Unique_Scope
[ "Prefix Notation", "Formal Languages" ]
[ "Definition:Formal Language", "Definition:Operation/Binary Operation/Prefix Notation", "Definition:Well-Formed Formula", "Definition:Occurrence (Formal Systems)", "Definition:Scope of Occurrence" ]
[ "Definition:Prefix Notation/Formal Definition", "Definition:Rule of Formation", "Definition:Well-Formed Formula", "Unique Readability for Prefix Notation", "Definition:Well-Formed Part", "Definition:Well-Formed Part", "Definition:Scope of Occurrence" ]
proofwiki-10841
Krull's Theorem
Let $R$ be a non-null ring with unity. Then $R$ has a maximal ideal.
Let $\struct {P, \subseteq}$ be the ordered set consisting of all proper ideals of $R$, ordered by inclusion. The theorem is proved by applying Zorn's Lemma to $P$. First, we check that the conditions for Zorn's Lemma are met: $P$ must be non-empty, and every non-empty chain in $P$ must have an upper bound.
Let $R$ be a [[Definition:Non-Null Ring|non-null]] [[Definition:Ring with Unity|ring with unity]]. Then $R$ has a [[Definition:Maximal Ideal of Ring|maximal ideal]].
Let $\struct {P, \subseteq}$ be the [[Definition:Ordered Set|ordered set]] consisting of all [[Definition:Proper Ideal of Ring|proper ideals]] of $R$, ordered by [[Definition:Subset|inclusion]]. The theorem is proved by applying [[Zorn's Lemma]] to $P$. First, we check that the conditions for [[Zorn's Lemma]] are met...
Krull's Theorem
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Krull's_Theorem
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Krull's_Theorem
[ "Ideal Theory", "Maximal Ideals of Rings" ]
[ "Definition:Non-Null Ring", "Definition:Ring with Unity", "Definition:Maximal Ideal of Ring" ]
[ "Definition:Ordered Set", "Definition:Ideal of Ring/Proper Ideal", "Definition:Subset", "Zorn's Lemma", "Zorn's Lemma", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Chain (Order Theory)/Subset Relation", "Definition:Upper Bound of Set", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definit...
proofwiki-10842
Exclusive Or as Conjunction of Disjunctions
:$p \oplus q \dashv \vdash \paren {p \lor q} \land \paren {\neg p \lor \neg q}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = p \oplus q | o = \dashv \vdash | r = \paren {p \lor q} \land \neg \paren {p \land q} | c = {{Defof|Exclusive Or}} }} {{eqn | o = \dashv \vdash | r = \paren {p \lor q} \land \paren {\neg p \lor \neg q} | c = De Morgan's Laws: Disjunction of Negations }} {{end-eqn}}...
:$p \oplus q \dashv \vdash \paren {p \lor q} \land \paren {\neg p \lor \neg q}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = p \oplus q | o = \dashv \vdash | r = \paren {p \lor q} \land \neg \paren {p \land q} | c = {{Defof|Exclusive Or}} }} {{eqn | o = \dashv \vdash | r = \paren {p \lor q} \land \paren {\neg p \lor \neg q} | c = [[De Morgan's Laws (Logic)/Disjunction of Negations|De Mo...
Exclusive Or as Conjunction of Disjunctions/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Exclusive_Or_as_Conjunction_of_Disjunctions
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Exclusive_Or_as_Conjunction_of_Disjunctions/Proof_1
[ "Exclusive Or as Conjunction of Disjunctions", "Exclusive Or", "Disjunction", "Conjunction" ]
[]
[ "De Morgan's Laws (Logic)/Disjunction of Negations" ]
proofwiki-10843
Exclusive Or as Conjunction of Disjunctions
:$p \oplus q \dashv \vdash \paren {p \lor q} \land \paren {\neg p \lor \neg q}$
We apply the Method of Truth Tables. As can be seen by inspection, the truth values under the main connectives match for all boolean interpretations. :<nowiki>$\begin {array} {|ccc||ccccccccc|} \hline p & \oplus & q & (p & \lor & q) & \land & (\neg & p & \lor & \neg & q) \\ \hline \F & \F & \F & \F & \F & \F & \F & \T ...
:$p \oplus q \dashv \vdash \paren {p \lor q} \land \paren {\neg p \lor \neg q}$
We apply the [[Method of Truth Tables]]. As can be seen by inspection, the [[Definition:Truth Value|truth values]] under the [[Definition:Main Connective (Propositional Logic)|main connectives]] match for all [[Definition:Boolean Interpretation|boolean interpretations]]. :<nowiki>$\begin {array} {|ccc||ccccccccc|} \h...
Exclusive Or as Conjunction of Disjunctions/Proof by Truth Table
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Exclusive_Or_as_Conjunction_of_Disjunctions
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Exclusive_Or_as_Conjunction_of_Disjunctions/Proof_by_Truth_Table
[ "Exclusive Or as Conjunction of Disjunctions", "Exclusive Or", "Disjunction", "Conjunction" ]
[]
[ "Method of Truth Tables", "Definition:Truth Value", "Definition:Main Connective/Propositional Logic", "Definition:Boolean Interpretation" ]
proofwiki-10844
NAND as Disjunction of Negations
:$p \uparrow q \dashv \vdash \neg p \lor \neg q$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = p \uparrow q | o = \dashv \vdash | r = \map \neg {p \land q} | c = {{Defof|Logical NAND}} }} {{eqn | o = \dashv \vdash | r = \neg p \lor \neg q | c = De Morgan's Laws: Disjunction of Negations }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
:$p \uparrow q \dashv \vdash \neg p \lor \neg q$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = p \uparrow q | o = \dashv \vdash | r = \map \neg {p \land q} | c = {{Defof|Logical NAND}} }} {{eqn | o = \dashv \vdash | r = \neg p \lor \neg q | c = [[De Morgan's Laws (Logic)/Disjunction of Negations|De Morgan's Laws: Disjunction of Negations]] }} {{end-eqn}} {{...
NAND as Disjunction of Negations/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/NAND_as_Disjunction_of_Negations
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/NAND_as_Disjunction_of_Negations/Proof_1
[ "Logical NAND", "Disjunction", "NAND as Disjunction of Negations" ]
[]
[ "De Morgan's Laws (Logic)/Disjunction of Negations" ]
proofwiki-10845
NAND as Disjunction of Negations
:$p \uparrow q \dashv \vdash \neg p \lor \neg q$
We apply the Method of Truth Tables. As can be seen by inspection, the truth values under the main connectives match for all boolean interpretations. $\begin{array}{|ccc||ccccc|} \hline p & \uparrow & q & \neg & p & \lor & \neg & q \\ \hline \F & \T & \F & \T & \F & \T & \T & \F \\ \F & \T & \T & \T & \F & \T & \F & \T...
:$p \uparrow q \dashv \vdash \neg p \lor \neg q$
We apply the [[Method of Truth Tables]]. As can be seen by inspection, the [[Definition:Truth Value|truth values]] under the [[Definition:Main Connective (Propositional Logic)|main connectives]] match for all [[Definition:Boolean Interpretation|boolean interpretations]]. $\begin{array}{|ccc||ccccc|} \hline p & \upar...
NAND as Disjunction of Negations/Proof by Truth Table
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/NAND_as_Disjunction_of_Negations
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/NAND_as_Disjunction_of_Negations/Proof_by_Truth_Table
[ "Logical NAND", "Disjunction", "NAND as Disjunction of Negations" ]
[]
[ "Method of Truth Tables", "Definition:Truth Value", "Definition:Main Connective/Propositional Logic", "Definition:Boolean Interpretation" ]
proofwiki-10846
Rule of Idempotence/Disjunction/Formulation 2/Forward Implication
: $\vdash p \implies \paren {p \lor p}$
{{BeginTableau|p \implies \paren {p \lor p} }} {{Assumption|1|p}} {{Addition|2|1|p \lor p|1|1}} {{Implication|3||p \implies \paren {p \lor p}|1|2}} {{EndTableau}} {{qed}} Category:Rule of Idempotence 9466a8vtv1pw8m79feaeim5qqcdowfs
: $\vdash p \implies \paren {p \lor p}$
{{BeginTableau|p \implies \paren {p \lor p} }} {{Assumption|1|p}} {{Addition|2|1|p \lor p|1|1}} {{Implication|3||p \implies \paren {p \lor p}|1|2}} {{EndTableau}} {{qed}} [[Category:Rule of Idempotence]] 9466a8vtv1pw8m79feaeim5qqcdowfs
Rule of Idempotence/Disjunction/Formulation 2/Forward Implication
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Idempotence/Disjunction/Formulation_2/Forward_Implication
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Idempotence/Disjunction/Formulation_2/Forward_Implication
[ "Rule of Idempotence" ]
[]
[ "Category:Rule of Idempotence" ]
proofwiki-10847
Rule of Idempotence/Disjunction/Formulation 2/Reverse Implication
: $\vdash \left({p \lor p}\right) \implies p$
{{BeginTableau|\left({p \lor p}\right) \implies p}} {{Premise|1|p \lor p}} {{Assumption|2|p}} {{ProofByCases|3|1|p|1|2|2|2|2}} {{Implication|4||\left({p \lor p}\right) \implies p|1|3}} {{EndTableau}} {{qed}}
: $\vdash \left({p \lor p}\right) \implies p$
{{BeginTableau|\left({p \lor p}\right) \implies p}} {{Premise|1|p \lor p}} {{Assumption|2|p}} {{ProofByCases|3|1|p|1|2|2|2|2}} {{Implication|4||\left({p \lor p}\right) \implies p|1|3}} {{EndTableau}} {{qed}}
Rule of Idempotence/Disjunction/Formulation 2/Reverse Implication
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Idempotence/Disjunction/Formulation_2/Reverse_Implication
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Idempotence/Disjunction/Formulation_2/Reverse_Implication
[ "Rule of Idempotence" ]
[]
[]
proofwiki-10848
Rule of Addition/Sequent Form/Formulation 2/Form 1
:$\vdash p \implies \paren {p \lor q}$
{{BeginTableau|p \implies \paren {p \lor q} }} {{Premise|1|p}} {{Addition|2|1|p \lor q|1|1}} {{Implication|3||p \implies \paren {p \lor q}|1|3}} {{EndTableau}} {{Qed}}
:$\vdash p \implies \paren {p \lor q}$
{{BeginTableau|p \implies \paren {p \lor q} }} {{Premise|1|p}} {{Addition|2|1|p \lor q|1|1}} {{Implication|3||p \implies \paren {p \lor q}|1|3}} {{EndTableau}} {{Qed}}
Rule of Addition/Sequent Form/Formulation 2/Form 1/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Addition/Sequent_Form/Formulation_2/Form_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Addition/Sequent_Form/Formulation_2/Form_1/Proof_1
[ "Rule of Addition" ]
[]
[]
proofwiki-10849
Rule of Addition/Sequent Form/Formulation 2/Form 1
:$\vdash p \implies \paren {p \lor q}$
{{BeginTableau|p \implies \paren {p \lor q}|Instance 2 of the Hilbert-style systems}} {{TableauLine | n = 1 | f = q \implies \paren {p \lor q} | rlnk = Definition:Hilbert Proof System/Instance 2 | rtxt = Axiom $\text A 2$ }} {{TableauLine | n = 2 | f = p \implies \paren {q \lor p} | rlnk = Definition:Hilbert Pro...
:$\vdash p \implies \paren {p \lor q}$
{{BeginTableau|p \implies \paren {p \lor q}|[[Definition:Hilbert Proof System/Instance 2|Instance 2 of the Hilbert-style systems]]}} {{TableauLine | n = 1 | f = q \implies \paren {p \lor q} | rlnk = Definition:Hilbert Proof System/Instance 2 | rtxt = Axiom $\text A 2$ }} {{TableauLine | n = 2 | f = p \implies \pa...
Rule of Addition/Sequent Form/Formulation 2/Form 1/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Addition/Sequent_Form/Formulation_2/Form_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Addition/Sequent_Form/Formulation_2/Form_1/Proof_2
[ "Rule of Addition" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Hilbert Proof System/Instance 2" ]
proofwiki-10850
Rule of Addition/Sequent Form/Formulation 2/Form 2
:$\vdash q \implies \left({p \lor q}\right)$
{{BeginTableau|q \implies \paren {p \lor q} }} {{Premise|1|q}} {{Addition|2|1|p \lor q|1|2}} {{Implication|3||q \implies \paren {p \lor q}|1|3}} {{EndTableau}} {{Qed}}
:$\vdash q \implies \left({p \lor q}\right)$
{{BeginTableau|q \implies \paren {p \lor q} }} {{Premise|1|q}} {{Addition|2|1|p \lor q|1|2}} {{Implication|3||q \implies \paren {p \lor q}|1|3}} {{EndTableau}} {{Qed}}
Rule of Addition/Sequent Form/Formulation 2/Form 2/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Addition/Sequent_Form/Formulation_2/Form_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Addition/Sequent_Form/Formulation_2/Form_2/Proof_1
[ "Rule of Addition" ]
[]
[]
proofwiki-10851
Rule of Addition/Sequent Form/Formulation 2
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | l = \vdash p | o = \implies | r = \paren {p \lor q} }} {{eqn | n = 2 | l = \vdash q | o = \implies | r = \paren {p \lor q} }} {{end-eqn}}
{{BeginTableau|p \implies \paren {p \lor q} }} {{Premise|1|p}} {{Addition|2|1|p \lor q|1|1}} {{Implication|3||p \implies \paren {p \lor q}|1|3}} {{EndTableau}} {{Qed}}
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | l = \vdash p | o = \implies | r = \paren {p \lor q} }} {{eqn | n = 2 | l = \vdash q | o = \implies | r = \paren {p \lor q} }} {{end-eqn}}
{{BeginTableau|p \implies \paren {p \lor q} }} {{Premise|1|p}} {{Addition|2|1|p \lor q|1|1}} {{Implication|3||p \implies \paren {p \lor q}|1|3}} {{EndTableau}} {{Qed}}
Rule of Addition/Sequent Form/Formulation 2/Form 1/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Addition/Sequent_Form/Formulation_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Addition/Sequent_Form/Formulation_2/Form_1/Proof_1
[ "Rule of Addition" ]
[]
[]
proofwiki-10852
Rule of Addition/Sequent Form/Formulation 2
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | l = \vdash p | o = \implies | r = \paren {p \lor q} }} {{eqn | n = 2 | l = \vdash q | o = \implies | r = \paren {p \lor q} }} {{end-eqn}}
{{BeginTableau|p \implies \paren {p \lor q}|Instance 2 of the Hilbert-style systems}} {{TableauLine | n = 1 | f = q \implies \paren {p \lor q} | rlnk = Definition:Hilbert Proof System/Instance 2 | rtxt = Axiom $\text A 2$ }} {{TableauLine | n = 2 | f = p \implies \paren {q \lor p} | rlnk = Definition:Hilbert Pro...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | l = \vdash p | o = \implies | r = \paren {p \lor q} }} {{eqn | n = 2 | l = \vdash q | o = \implies | r = \paren {p \lor q} }} {{end-eqn}}
{{BeginTableau|p \implies \paren {p \lor q}|[[Definition:Hilbert Proof System/Instance 2|Instance 2 of the Hilbert-style systems]]}} {{TableauLine | n = 1 | f = q \implies \paren {p \lor q} | rlnk = Definition:Hilbert Proof System/Instance 2 | rtxt = Axiom $\text A 2$ }} {{TableauLine | n = 2 | f = p \implies \pa...
Rule of Addition/Sequent Form/Formulation 2/Form 1/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Addition/Sequent_Form/Formulation_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Addition/Sequent_Form/Formulation_2/Form_1/Proof_2
[ "Rule of Addition" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Hilbert Proof System/Instance 2" ]
proofwiki-10853
Rule of Addition/Sequent Form/Formulation 2
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | l = \vdash p | o = \implies | r = \paren {p \lor q} }} {{eqn | n = 2 | l = \vdash q | o = \implies | r = \paren {p \lor q} }} {{end-eqn}}
{{BeginTableau|q \implies \paren {p \lor q} }} {{Premise|1|q}} {{Addition|2|1|p \lor q|1|2}} {{Implication|3||q \implies \paren {p \lor q}|1|3}} {{EndTableau}} {{Qed}}
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | l = \vdash p | o = \implies | r = \paren {p \lor q} }} {{eqn | n = 2 | l = \vdash q | o = \implies | r = \paren {p \lor q} }} {{end-eqn}}
{{BeginTableau|q \implies \paren {p \lor q} }} {{Premise|1|q}} {{Addition|2|1|p \lor q|1|2}} {{Implication|3||q \implies \paren {p \lor q}|1|3}} {{EndTableau}} {{Qed}}
Rule of Addition/Sequent Form/Formulation 2/Form 2/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Addition/Sequent_Form/Formulation_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Addition/Sequent_Form/Formulation_2/Form_2/Proof_1
[ "Rule of Addition" ]
[]
[]
proofwiki-10854
Rule of Addition/Sequent Form/Formulation 2
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | l = \vdash p | o = \implies | r = \paren {p \lor q} }} {{eqn | n = 2 | l = \vdash q | o = \implies | r = \paren {p \lor q} }} {{end-eqn}}
=== Form 1 === {{:Rule of Addition/Sequent Form/Formulation 2/Proof 1/Form 1}} === Form 2 === {{:Rule of Addition/Sequent Form/Formulation 2/Proof 1/Form 2}}
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | l = \vdash p | o = \implies | r = \paren {p \lor q} }} {{eqn | n = 2 | l = \vdash q | o = \implies | r = \paren {p \lor q} }} {{end-eqn}}
=== [[Rule of Addition/Sequent Form/Formulation 2/Proof 1/Form 1|Form 1]] === {{:Rule of Addition/Sequent Form/Formulation 2/Proof 1/Form 1}} === [[Rule of Addition/Sequent Form/Formulation 2/Proof 1/Form 2|Form 2]] === {{:Rule of Addition/Sequent Form/Formulation 2/Proof 1/Form 2}}
Rule of Addition/Sequent Form/Formulation 2/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Addition/Sequent_Form/Formulation_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Addition/Sequent_Form/Formulation_2/Proof_1
[ "Rule of Addition" ]
[]
[ "Rule of Addition/Sequent Form/Formulation 2/Form 1/Proof 1", "Rule of Addition/Sequent Form/Formulation 2/Form 2/Proof 1" ]
proofwiki-10855
Rule of Addition/Sequent Form/Formulation 2
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | l = \vdash p | o = \implies | r = \paren {p \lor q} }} {{eqn | n = 2 | l = \vdash q | o = \implies | r = \paren {p \lor q} }} {{end-eqn}}
We apply the Method of Truth Tables. As can be seen by inspection, the truth values under the main connectives are $T$ for all boolean interpretations. :<nowiki>$\begin{array}{|c|c|ccccc|ccccc|} \hline p & q & p & \implies & (p & \lor & q) & q & \implies & (p & \lor & q) \\ \hline \F & \F & \F & \T & \F & \F & \F & \F ...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | l = \vdash p | o = \implies | r = \paren {p \lor q} }} {{eqn | n = 2 | l = \vdash q | o = \implies | r = \paren {p \lor q} }} {{end-eqn}}
We apply the [[Method of Truth Tables]]. As can be seen by inspection, the [[Definition:Truth Value|truth values]] under the [[Definition:Main Connective (Propositional Logic)|main connectives]] are $T$ for all [[Definition:Boolean Interpretation|boolean interpretations]]. :<nowiki>$\begin{array}{|c|c|ccccc|ccccc|} \...
Rule of Addition/Sequent Form/Formulation 2/Proof by Truth Table
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Addition/Sequent_Form/Formulation_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Addition/Sequent_Form/Formulation_2/Proof_by_Truth_Table
[ "Rule of Addition" ]
[]
[ "Method of Truth Tables", "Definition:Truth Value", "Definition:Main Connective/Propositional Logic", "Definition:Boolean Interpretation" ]
proofwiki-10856
Hilbert Proof System Instance 2 is Consistent
Instance 2 of the Hilbert proof systems $\mathscr H_2$ is consistent.
Consider Instance 1 of a constructed semantics, denoted $\mathscr C_1$. Note that $\neg p$ is not a tautology for $\mathscr C_1$. We will establish that every $\mathscr H_2$-theorem is a $\mathscr C_1$-tautology. That is, that $\mathscr H_2$ is sound for $\mathscr C_1$. Starting with the axioms: {{begin-axiom}} {{axiom...
[[Definition:Hilbert Proof System/Instance 2|Instance 2]] of the [[Definition:Hilbert Proof System|Hilbert proof systems]] $\mathscr H_2$ is [[Definition:Consistent Proof System|consistent]].
Consider [[Definition:Constructed Semantics/Instance 1|Instance 1]] of a [[Definition:Constructed Semantics|constructed semantics]], denoted $\mathscr C_1$. Note that $\neg p$ is not a [[Definition:Tautology (Formal Semantics)|tautology]] for $\mathscr C_1$. We will establish that every $\mathscr H_2$-[[Definition:Th...
Hilbert Proof System Instance 2 is Consistent
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hilbert_Proof_System_Instance_2_is_Consistent
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hilbert_Proof_System_Instance_2_is_Consistent
[ "Hilbert Proof System Instance 2" ]
[ "Definition:Hilbert Proof System/Instance 2", "Definition:Hilbert Proof System", "Definition:Consistent (Logic)/Proof System" ]
[ "Definition:Constructed Semantics/Instance 1", "Definition:Constructed Semantics", "Definition:Tautology/Formal Semantics", "Definition:Theorem/Formal System", "Definition:Tautology/Formal Semantics", "Definition:Sound Proof System", "Definition:Axiom/Formal Systems", "Rule of Idempotence/Disjunction/...
proofwiki-10857
Set of Local Minimum is Countable
Let $X$ be a subset of $\R$. The set: :$\leftset {x \in X: x}$ is local minimum in $\rightset X$ is countable.
Define: :$Y := \leftset {x \in X: x}$ is local minimum in $\rightset X$ By definition of $Y$ and definition of local minimum in set: :$\forall x \in Y: \exists y \in \R: y < x \land \openint y x \cap X = \O$ By the Axiom of Choice, define a mapping $f: Y \to \powerset \R$ as: :$\forall x \in Y: \exists y \in \R: \map f...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $\R$. The set: :$\leftset {x \in X: x}$ is [[Definition:Local Minimum in Set of Reals|local minimum in]] $\rightset X$ is [[Definition:Countable Set|countable]].
Define: :$Y := \leftset {x \in X: x}$ is [[Definition:Local Minimum in Set of Reals|local minimum in]] $\rightset X$ By definition of $Y$ and definition of [[Definition:Local Minimum in Set of Reals|local minimum in set]]: :$\forall x \in Y: \exists y \in \R: y < x \land \openint y x \cap X = \O$ By the [[Axiom:Axiom...
Set of Local Minimum is Countable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_of_Local_Minimum_is_Countable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_of_Local_Minimum_is_Countable
[ "Real Analysis", "Countable Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Local Minimum in Set of Reals", "Definition:Countable Set" ]
[ "Definition:Local Minimum in Set of Reals", "Definition:Local Minimum in Set of Reals", "Axiom:Axiom of Choice", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Injection", "Definition:Injection", "Cardinality of Image of Injection", "Definition:Cardinality", "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Subset", "Def...
proofwiki-10858
Set of Pairwise Disjoint Intervals is Countable
Let $X$ be a subset of $\powerset \R$ such that: :$(1): \quad X$ is pairwise disjoint: ::::$\forall A, B \in X: A \ne B \implies A \cap B = \O$. :$(2): \quad$ every element of $X$ contains an open interval: ::::$\forall A \in X: \exists x, y \in \R: x < y \land \openint x y \subseteq A$. Then $X$ is countable.
By Between two Real Numbers exists Rational Number: :$\forall A \in X: \exists x, y \in \R, q \in \Q: x < y \land q \in \openint x y \subseteq A$ By the Axiom of Choice define a mapping $f: X \to \Q$: :$\forall A \in X: \map f A \in A$ First it needs to be shown that $f$ is an injection by definition. Let $A, B \in X$ ...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $\powerset \R$ such that: :$(1): \quad X$ is [[Definition:Pairwise Disjoint|pairwise disjoint]]: ::::$\forall A, B \in X: A \ne B \implies A \cap B = \O$. :$(2): \quad$ every [[Definition:Element|element]] of $X$ [[Definition:Superset|contains]] an [[Definition:Open Real Int...
By [[Between two Real Numbers exists Rational Number]]: :$\forall A \in X: \exists x, y \in \R, q \in \Q: x < y \land q \in \openint x y \subseteq A$ By the [[Axiom:Axiom of Choice|Axiom of Choice]] define a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]] $f: X \to \Q$: :$\forall A \in X: \map f A \in A$ First it needs to be shown t...
Set of Pairwise Disjoint Intervals is Countable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_of_Pairwise_Disjoint_Intervals_is_Countable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_of_Pairwise_Disjoint_Intervals_is_Countable
[ "Countable Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Pairwise Disjoint", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Subset/Superset", "Definition:Real Interval/Open", "Definition:Countable Set" ]
[ "Between two Real Numbers exists Rational Number", "Axiom:Axiom of Choice", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Injection", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Empty Set", "Definition:Pairwise Disjoint", "Definition:Injection", "Set is Subset of Itself", "Definition:Subset", "Cardinality of...
proofwiki-10859
Set is Countable if Cardinality equals Cardinality of Countable Set
Let $X, Y$ be sets. Let: :$\card X = \card Y$ where $\card X$ denotes the cardinality of $X$. If $X$ is countable then $Y$ is countable.
Assume that $X$ is countable. By definition of countable set there exists an injection:L :$f: X \to \N$ By definition of cardinality the sets $Y$ and $X$ are equivalent: :$Y \sim X$ Then by definition of set equivalence there exists a bijection: :$g: Y \to X$ By definition of bijection: :$g$ is an injection. Hence by C...
Let $X, Y$ be [[Definition:Set|sets]]. Let: :$\card X = \card Y$ where $\card X$ denotes the [[Definition:Cardinality|cardinality]] of $X$. If $X$ is [[Definition:Countable Set|countable]] then $Y$ is [[Definition:Countable Set|countable]].
Assume that $X$ is [[Definition:Countable Set|countable]]. By definition of [[Definition:Countable Set|countable set]] there exists an [[Definition:Injection|injection]]:L :$f: X \to \N$ By definition of [[Definition:Cardinality|cardinality]] the sets $Y$ and $X$ are [[Definition:Set Equivalence|equivalent]]: :$Y \si...
Set is Countable if Cardinality equals Cardinality of Countable Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_is_Countable_if_Cardinality_equals_Cardinality_of_Countable_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_is_Countable_if_Cardinality_equals_Cardinality_of_Countable_Set
[ "Countable Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Cardinality", "Definition:Countable Set", "Definition:Countable Set" ]
[ "Definition:Countable Set", "Definition:Countable Set", "Definition:Injection", "Definition:Cardinality", "Definition:Set Equivalence", "Definition:Set Equivalence", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Injection", "Composite of Injections is Injection", "Definition:Inject...
proofwiki-10860
Double Negation/Double Negation Introduction/Sequent Form
{{:Double Negation/Double Negation Introduction/Sequent Form/Formulation 1}}
{{BeginTableau|p \vdash \neg \neg p}} {{Premise|1|p}} {{Assumption|2|\neg p}} {{NonContradiction|3|1, 2|1|2}} {{Contradiction|4|1|\neg \neg p|2|3}} {{EndTableau|qed}}
{{:Double Negation/Double Negation Introduction/Sequent Form/Formulation 1}}
{{BeginTableau|p \vdash \neg \neg p}} {{Premise|1|p}} {{Assumption|2|\neg p}} {{NonContradiction|3|1, 2|1|2}} {{Contradiction|4|1|\neg \neg p|2|3}} {{EndTableau|qed}}
Double Negation/Double Negation Introduction/Sequent Form/Formulation 1/Proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Double_Negation/Double_Negation_Introduction/Sequent_Form
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Double_Negation/Double_Negation_Introduction/Sequent_Form/Formulation_1/Proof
[ "Double Negation Introduction" ]
[]
[]
proofwiki-10861
Principle of Non-Contradiction/Sequent Form
{{:Principle of Non-Contradiction/Sequent Form/Formulation 1}}
{{BeginTableau|p, \neg p \vdash \bot}} {{Premise|1|p}} {{Premise|2|\neg p}} {{NonContradiction|3|1, 2|1|2}} {{EndTableau}} {{Qed}}
{{:Principle of Non-Contradiction/Sequent Form/Formulation 1}}
{{BeginTableau|p, \neg p \vdash \bot}} {{Premise|1|p}} {{Premise|2|\neg p}} {{NonContradiction|3|1, 2|1|2}} {{EndTableau}} {{Qed}}
Principle of Non-Contradiction/Sequent Form/Formulation 1/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Principle_of_Non-Contradiction/Sequent_Form
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Principle_of_Non-Contradiction/Sequent_Form/Formulation_1/Proof_1
[ "Principle of Non-Contradiction" ]
[]
[]
proofwiki-10862
Principle of Non-Contradiction/Sequent Form
{{:Principle of Non-Contradiction/Sequent Form/Formulation 1}}
We apply the Method of Truth Tables. :<nowiki>$\begin {array} {|cccc||c|} \hline p & \land & \neg & p & \bot \\ \hline \F & \F & \T & \F & \F \\ \T & \F & \F & \T & \F \\ \hline \end {array}$</nowiki> As can be seen by inspection, the truth value of the main connective, that is $\land$, is $F$ for each boolean interpre...
{{:Principle of Non-Contradiction/Sequent Form/Formulation 1}}
We apply the [[Method of Truth Tables]]. :<nowiki>$\begin {array} {|cccc||c|} \hline p & \land & \neg & p & \bot \\ \hline \F & \F & \T & \F & \F \\ \T & \F & \F & \T & \F \\ \hline \end {array}$</nowiki> As can be seen by inspection, the [[Definition:Truth Value|truth value]] of the [[Definition:Main Connective (Pro...
Principle of Non-Contradiction/Sequent Form/Formulation 1/Proof by Truth Table
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Principle_of_Non-Contradiction/Sequent_Form
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Principle_of_Non-Contradiction/Sequent_Form/Formulation_1/Proof_by_Truth_Table
[ "Principle of Non-Contradiction" ]
[]
[ "Method of Truth Tables", "Definition:Truth Value", "Definition:Main Connective/Propositional Logic", "Definition:Boolean Interpretation" ]
proofwiki-10863
Principle of Non-Contradiction/Sequent Form
{{:Principle of Non-Contradiction/Sequent Form/Formulation 1}}
{{BeginTableau|\vdash \neg \left({p \land \neg p}\right)}} {{Assumption|1|p \land \neg p}} {{Simplification|2|1|p|1|1}} {{Simplification|3|1|\neg p|1|2}} {{NonContradiction|4|1|2|3}} {{Contradiction|5||\neg \left({p \land \neg p}\right)|1|4}} {{EndTableau|qed}}
{{:Principle of Non-Contradiction/Sequent Form/Formulation 1}}
{{BeginTableau|\vdash \neg \left({p \land \neg p}\right)}} {{Assumption|1|p \land \neg p}} {{Simplification|2|1|p|1|1}} {{Simplification|3|1|\neg p|1|2}} {{NonContradiction|4|1|2|3}} {{Contradiction|5||\neg \left({p \land \neg p}\right)|1|4}} {{EndTableau|qed}}
Principle of Non-Contradiction/Sequent Form/Formulation 2/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Principle_of_Non-Contradiction/Sequent_Form
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Principle_of_Non-Contradiction/Sequent_Form/Formulation_2/Proof_1
[ "Principle of Non-Contradiction" ]
[]
[]
proofwiki-10864
Principle of Non-Contradiction/Sequent Form
{{:Principle of Non-Contradiction/Sequent Form/Formulation 1}}
We apply the Method of Truth Tables to the proposition $\neg \paren {p \land \neg p}$. As can be seen by inspection, the truth value of the main connective, that is $\neg$, is $T$ for each boolean interpretation for $p$. :<nowiki>$\begin {array} {|ccccc|} \hline \neg & (p & \land & \neg & p)\\ \hline \T & \F & \F & \T ...
{{:Principle of Non-Contradiction/Sequent Form/Formulation 1}}
We apply the [[Method of Truth Tables]] to the proposition $\neg \paren {p \land \neg p}$. As can be seen by inspection, the [[Definition:Truth Value|truth value]] of the [[Definition:Main Connective (Propositional Logic)|main connective]], that is $\neg$, is $T$ for each [[Definition:Boolean Interpretation|boolean in...
Principle of Non-Contradiction/Sequent Form/Formulation 2/Proof by Truth Table
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Principle_of_Non-Contradiction/Sequent_Form
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Principle_of_Non-Contradiction/Sequent_Form/Formulation_2/Proof_by_Truth_Table
[ "Principle of Non-Contradiction" ]
[]
[ "Method of Truth Tables", "Definition:Truth Value", "Definition:Main Connective/Propositional Logic", "Definition:Boolean Interpretation" ]
proofwiki-10865
Factorization of Natural Numbers within 4 n + 1 not Unique
Let: :$S = \set {4 n + 1: n \in \N} = \set {1, 5, 9, 13, 17, \ldots}$ be the set of natural numbers of the form $4 n + 1$. Then not all elements of $S$ have a complete factorization by other elements of $S$ which is unique.
Proof by Counterexample: Consider the number: :$m = 693 = 3^2 \times 7 \times 11$ Thus: :$m = 9 \times 77 = 21 \times 33$ We have that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 9 | r = 4 \times 2 + 1 | rr= \in S }} {{eqn | l = 77 | r = 4 \times 19 + 1 | rr= \in S }} {{eqn | l = 21 | r = 4 \times 5 + 1 ...
Let: :$S = \set {4 n + 1: n \in \N} = \set {1, 5, 9, 13, 17, \ldots}$ be the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Natural Number|natural numbers]] of the form $4 n + 1$. Then not all [[Definition:Element|elements]] of $S$ have a [[Definition:Complete Factorization|complete factorization]] by other [[Definition:Elem...
[[Proof by Counterexample]]: Consider the [[Definition:Natural Number|number]]: :$m = 693 = 3^2 \times 7 \times 11$ Thus: :$m = 9 \times 77 = 21 \times 33$ We have that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 9 | r = 4 \times 2 + 1 | rr= \in S }} {{eqn | l = 77 | r = 4 \times 19 + 1 | rr= \in S }} {{eqn...
Factorization of Natural Numbers within 4 n + 1 not Unique
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Factorization_of_Natural_Numbers_within_4_n_+_1_not_Unique
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Factorization_of_Natural_Numbers_within_4_n_+_1_not_Unique
[ "Number Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Complete Factorization", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Unique" ]
[ "Proof by Counterexample", "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Complete Factorization", "Definition:Element" ]
proofwiki-10866
Solutions of Pythagorean Equation/Primitive
The set of all primitive Pythagorean triples is generated by: :$\tuple {2 m n, m^2 - n^2, m^2 + n^2}$ where: :$m, n \in \Z_{>0}$ are (strictly) positive integers :$m \perp n$, that is, $m$ and $n$ are coprime :$m$ and $n$ are of opposite parity :$m > n$
First we show that $\tuple {2 m n, m^2 - n^2, m^2 + n^2}$ is a Pythagorean triple: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {2 m n}^2 + \paren {m^2 - n^2}^2 | r = 4 m^2 n^2 + m^4 - 2 m^2 n^2 + n^4 | c = }} {{eqn | r = m^4 + 2 m^2 n^2 + n^4 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \paren {m^2 + n^2}^2 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} S...
The [[Definition:Set|set]] of all [[Definition:Primitive Pythagorean Triple|primitive Pythagorean triples]] is generated by: :$\tuple {2 m n, m^2 - n^2, m^2 + n^2}$ where: :$m, n \in \Z_{>0}$ are [[Definition:Strictly Positive Integer|(strictly) positive integers]] :$m \perp n$, that is, $m$ and $n$ are [[Definition:C...
First we show that $\tuple {2 m n, m^2 - n^2, m^2 + n^2}$ is a [[Definition:Pythagorean Triple|Pythagorean triple]]: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {2 m n}^2 + \paren {m^2 - n^2}^2 | r = 4 m^2 n^2 + m^4 - 2 m^2 n^2 + n^4 | c = }} {{eqn | r = m^4 + 2 m^2 n^2 + n^4 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \paren {m^2 + ...
Solutions of Pythagorean Equation/Primitive/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Solutions_of_Pythagorean_Equation/Primitive
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Solutions_of_Pythagorean_Equation/Primitive/Proof_1
[ "Solutions of Pythagorean Equation" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Pythagorean Triple/Primitive", "Definition:Strictly Positive/Integer", "Definition:Coprime/Integers", "Definition:Parity of Integer" ]
[ "Definition:Pythagorean Triple", "Definition:Pythagorean Triple", "Definition:Pythagorean Triple/Primitive", "Definition:Pythagorean Triple/Primitive", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Prime Divides Power", "Common Divisor Divides Integer Combination", "Prime Divid...
proofwiki-10867
Solutions of Pythagorean Equation/Primitive
The set of all primitive Pythagorean triples is generated by: :$\tuple {2 m n, m^2 - n^2, m^2 + n^2}$ where: :$m, n \in \Z_{>0}$ are (strictly) positive integers :$m \perp n$, that is, $m$ and $n$ are coprime :$m$ and $n$ are of opposite parity :$m > n$
Let $\tuple {A, B, C}$ be a Pythagorean Triple: :$A^2 + B^2 = C^2$ By the Pythagorean theorem, this equation describes the sides of a right triangle: :400px By the definitions of sine and cosine: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sin \theta | r = \frac A C }} {{eqn | l = \cos \theta | r = \frac B C }} {{end-eqn}} ...
The [[Definition:Set|set]] of all [[Definition:Primitive Pythagorean Triple|primitive Pythagorean triples]] is generated by: :$\tuple {2 m n, m^2 - n^2, m^2 + n^2}$ where: :$m, n \in \Z_{>0}$ are [[Definition:Strictly Positive Integer|(strictly) positive integers]] :$m \perp n$, that is, $m$ and $n$ are [[Definition:C...
Let $\tuple {A, B, C}$ be a [[Definition:Pythagorean Triple|Pythagorean Triple]]: :$A^2 + B^2 = C^2$ By the [[Pythagoras's Theorem|Pythagorean theorem]], this equation describes the sides of a [[Definition:Right Triangle|right triangle]]: :[[File:RightTriangleWithTheta.png|400px]] By the [[Definition:Sine of Angle|...
Solutions of Pythagorean Equation/Primitive/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Solutions_of_Pythagorean_Equation/Primitive
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Solutions_of_Pythagorean_Equation/Primitive/Proof_2
[ "Solutions of Pythagorean Equation" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Pythagorean Triple/Primitive", "Definition:Strictly Positive/Integer", "Definition:Coprime/Integers", "Definition:Parity of Integer" ]
[ "Definition:Pythagorean Triple", "Pythagoras's Theorem", "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)/Right-Angled", "File:RightTriangleWithTheta.png", "Definition:Sine/Definition from Triangle", "Definition:Cosine/Definition from Triangle", "Equiangular Triangles are Similar", "Proportion is Equivalence Relation"...
proofwiki-10868
Solutions of Pythagorean Equation/General
Let $x, y, z$ be a solution to the Pythagorean equation. Then $x = k x', y = k y', z = k z'$, where: :$\tuple {x', y', z'}$ is a primitive Pythagorean triple :$k \in \Z: k \ge 1$
Let $\tuple {x, y, z}$ be non-primitive solution to the Pythagorean equation. Let: :$\exists k \in \Z: k \ge 2, k \divides x, k \divides y$ such that $x \perp y$. Then we can express $x$ and $y$ as $x = k x', y = k y'$. Thus: :$z^2 = k^2 x'^2 + k^2 y'^2 = k^2 z'^2$ for some $z' \in \Z$. Let: :$\exists k \in \Z: k \ge 2...
Let $x, y, z$ be a solution to the [[Definition:Pythagorean Equation|Pythagorean equation]]. Then $x = k x', y = k y', z = k z'$, where: :$\tuple {x', y', z'}$ is a [[Definition:Primitive Pythagorean Triple|primitive Pythagorean triple]] :$k \in \Z: k \ge 1$
Let $\tuple {x, y, z}$ be non-[[Definition:Primitive Pythagorean Triple|primitive solution]] to the [[Definition:Pythagorean Equation|Pythagorean equation]]. Let: :$\exists k \in \Z: k \ge 2, k \divides x, k \divides y$ such that $x \perp y$. Then we can express $x$ and $y$ as $x = k x', y = k y'$. Thus: :$z^2 = k^...
Solutions of Pythagorean Equation/General
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Solutions_of_Pythagorean_Equation/General
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Solutions_of_Pythagorean_Equation/General
[ "Solutions of Pythagorean Equation" ]
[ "Definition:Pythagorean Equation", "Definition:Pythagorean Triple/Primitive" ]
[ "Definition:Pythagorean Triple/Primitive", "Definition:Pythagorean Equation", "Definition:Common Divisor/Integers", "Definition:Common Divisor/Integers", "Definition:Common Divisor/Integers", "Definition:Pythagorean Triple/Primitive", "Definition:Pythagorean Equation", "Definition:Pythagorean Triple/P...
proofwiki-10869
Goldbach Conjecture implies Goldbach's Marginal Conjecture
Suppose the Goldbach Conjecture holds: :Every even integer greater than $2$ is the sum of two primes. Then Goldbach's Marginal Conjecture follows: :Every integer greater than $5$ can be written as the sum of three primes.
Suppose the Goldbach Conjecture holds. Let $n \in \Z$ such that $n > 5$. Let $n$ be an odd integer. Then $n - 3$ is an even integer greater than $2$. By the Goldbach Conjecture: :$n - 3 = p_1 + p_2$ where $p_1$ and $p_2$ are both primes. Then: :$n = p_1 + p_2 + 3$ As $3$ is prime, the result follows. Let $n$ be an even...
Suppose the [[Goldbach Conjecture]] holds: :Every [[Definition:Even Integer|even integer]] greater than $2$ is the sum of two [[Definition:Prime Number|primes]]. Then [[Goldbach's Marginal Conjecture]] follows: :Every [[Definition:Integer|integer]] greater than $5$ can be written as the sum of three [[Definition:Prim...
Suppose the [[Goldbach Conjecture]] holds. Let $n \in \Z$ such that $n > 5$. Let $n$ be an [[Definition:Odd Integer|odd integer]]. Then $n - 3$ is an [[Definition:Even Integer|even integer]] greater than $2$. By the [[Goldbach Conjecture]]: :$n - 3 = p_1 + p_2$ where $p_1$ and $p_2$ are both [[Definition:Prime Num...
Goldbach Conjecture implies Goldbach's Marginal Conjecture
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Goldbach_Conjecture_implies_Goldbach's_Marginal_Conjecture
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Goldbach_Conjecture_implies_Goldbach's_Marginal_Conjecture
[ "Prime Numbers", "Goldbach Conjecture" ]
[ "Goldbach Conjecture", "Definition:Even Integer", "Definition:Prime Number", "Goldbach Conjecture/Marginal", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Prime Number" ]
[ "Goldbach Conjecture", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Even Integer", "Goldbach Conjecture", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Even Integer", "Definition:Even Integer", "Goldbach Conjecture", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Category:...
proofwiki-10870
Congruent Integers are of same Quadratic Character
Let $p$ be an odd prime. Let $a \in \Z$ be an integer such that $a \not \equiv 0 \pmod p$. Let $a \equiv b \pmod p$. Then $a$ and $b$ have the same quadratic character.
Let $a \equiv b \pmod p$. Then by Congruence of Powers: :$a^2 \equiv b^2 \pmod p$ Hence: :$x^2 \equiv a \pmod p$ has a solution {{iff}} $x^2 \equiv b \pmod p$. Hence the result. {{qed}} Category:Quadratic Residues rqg7tzzvmszbgwmoy21zvr5o7qdyw94
Let $p$ be an [[Definition:Odd Prime|odd prime]]. Let $a \in \Z$ be an [[Definition:Integer|integer]] such that $a \not \equiv 0 \pmod p$. Let $a \equiv b \pmod p$. Then $a$ and $b$ have the same [[Definition:Quadratic Character|quadratic character]].
Let $a \equiv b \pmod p$. Then by [[Congruence of Powers]]: :$a^2 \equiv b^2 \pmod p$ Hence: :$x^2 \equiv a \pmod p$ has a solution {{iff}} $x^2 \equiv b \pmod p$. Hence the result. {{qed}} [[Category:Quadratic Residues]] rqg7tzzvmszbgwmoy21zvr5o7qdyw94
Congruent Integers are of same Quadratic Character
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Congruent_Integers_are_of_same_Quadratic_Character
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Congruent_Integers_are_of_same_Quadratic_Character
[ "Quadratic Residues" ]
[ "Definition:Odd Prime", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Quadratic Residue/Character" ]
[ "Congruence of Powers", "Category:Quadratic Residues" ]
proofwiki-10871
Weight of Sorgenfrey Line is Continuum
Let $T = \struct {\R, \tau}$ be the Sorgenfrey line. Then $\map w T = \mathfrak c$ where :$\map w T$ denotes the weight of $T$ :$\mathfrak c$ denotes continuum, the cardinality of real numbers.
By definition of Sorgenfrey line, the set: :$\BB = \set {\hointr x y: x, y \in \R \land x < y}$ is a basis of $T$. By definition of weight: :$\map w T \le \card \BB$ where $\card \BB$ denotes the cardinality of $\BB$. By Cardinality of Basis of Sorgenfrey Line not greater than Continuum: :$\card \BB \le \mathfrak c$ Th...
Let $T = \struct {\R, \tau}$ be the [[Definition:Sorgenfrey Line|Sorgenfrey line]]. Then $\map w T = \mathfrak c$ where :$\map w T$ denotes the [[Definition:Weight of Topological Space|weight]] of $T$ :$\mathfrak c$ denotes [[Definition:Cardinality of Continuum|continuum]], the [[Definition:Cardinality|cardinality]] ...
By definition of [[Definition:Sorgenfrey Line|Sorgenfrey line]], the [[Definition:Set|set]]: :$\BB = \set {\hointr x y: x, y \in \R \land x < y}$ is a [[Definition:Analytic Basis|basis]] of $T$. By definition of [[Definition:Weight of Topological Space|weight]]: :$\map w T \le \card \BB$ where $\card \BB$ denotes the ...
Weight of Sorgenfrey Line is Continuum
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Weight_of_Sorgenfrey_Line_is_Continuum
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Weight_of_Sorgenfrey_Line_is_Continuum
[ "Sorgenfrey Line" ]
[ "Definition:Sorgenfrey Line", "Definition:Weight of Topological Space", "Definition:Cardinality of Continuum", "Definition:Cardinality", "Definition:Real Number" ]
[ "Definition:Sorgenfrey Line", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis", "Definition:Weight of Topological Space", "Definition:Cardinality", "Cardinality of Basis of Sorgenfrey Line not greater than Continuum", "Definition:Weight of Topological Space", "Definition:Basis (Topology)...
proofwiki-10872
Construction of Regular Heptadecagon
It is possible to construct a regular hepadecagon (that is, a regular polygon with $17$ sides) using a compass and straightedge construction.
It remains to be demonstrated that the line segment $NM$ is the side of a regular hepadecagon inscribed in circle $ACB$. This will be done by demonstrating that $\angle NOM$ is equal to $\dfrac {2 \pi} {17}$ radians, that is, $\dfrac 1 {17}$ of the full circle $ACB$. For convenience, let the radius $OA$ be equal to $4 ...
It is possible to construct a [[Definition:Regular Heptadecagon|regular hepadecagon]] (that is, a [[Definition:Regular Polygon|regular polygon]] with $17$ [[Definition:Side of Polygon|sides]]) using a [[Definition:Compass and Straightedge Construction|compass and straightedge construction]].
It remains to be demonstrated that the [[Definition:Line Segment|line segment]] $NM$ is the [[Definition:Side of Polygon|side]] of a [[Definition:Regular Heptadecagon|regular hepadecagon]] [[Definition:Polygon Inscribed in Circle|inscribed]] in [[Definition:Circle|circle]] $ACB$. This will be done by demonstrating tha...
Construction of Regular Heptadecagon
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Construction_of_Regular_Heptadecagon
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Construction_of_Regular_Heptadecagon
[ "Compass and Straightedge Constructions", "Regular Polygons", "17" ]
[ "Definition:Heptadecagon/Regular", "Definition:Polygon/Regular", "Definition:Polygon/Side", "Definition:Compass and Straightedge Construction" ]
[ "Definition:Line/Segment", "Definition:Polygon/Side", "Definition:Heptadecagon/Regular", "Definition:Inscribe/Polygon in Circle", "Definition:Circle", "Definition:Angular Measure/Radian", "Definition:Circle", "Definition:Circle/Radius", "Pythagoras's Theorem", "Definition:Tangent Function/Definiti...
proofwiki-10873
Set of Subset of Reals with Cardinality less than Continuum has not Interval in Union Closure
Let $\BB$ be a set of subsets of $\R$, the set of all real numbers. Let: :$\card \BB < \mathfrak c$ where :$\card \BB$ denotes the cardinality of $\BB$ :$\mathfrak c = \card \R$ denotes continuum. Let $\FF = \set {\bigcup \GG: \GG \subseteq \BB}$. Then: :$\exists x, y \in \R: x < y \land \hointr x y \notin \FF$
Define: :$ Z = \leftset {x \in \R: \exists U \in \FF: x}$ is local minimum in $\rightset U$ By Set of Subsets of Reals with Cardinality less than Continuum Cardinality of Local Minimums of Union Closure less than Continuum: :$\card Z < \mathfrak c$ Then by Cardinalities form Inequality implies Difference is Nonempty: :...
Let $\BB$ be a [[Definition:Set of Sets|set]] of [[Definition:Subset|subsets]] of $\R$, the [[Definition:Set|set]] of all [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]]. Let: :$\card \BB < \mathfrak c$ where :$\card \BB$ denotes the [[Definition:Cardinality|cardinality]] of $\BB$ :$\mathfrak c = \card \R$ denotes [[Definitio...
Define: :$ Z = \leftset {x \in \R: \exists U \in \FF: x}$ is local minimum in $\rightset U$ By [[Set of Subsets of Reals with Cardinality less than Continuum Cardinality of Local Minimums of Union Closure less than Continuum]]: :$\card Z < \mathfrak c$ Then by [[Cardinalities form Inequality implies Difference is Non...
Set of Subset of Reals with Cardinality less than Continuum has not Interval in Union Closure
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_of_Subset_of_Reals_with_Cardinality_less_than_Continuum_has_not_Interval_in_Union_Closure
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_of_Subset_of_Reals_with_Cardinality_less_than_Continuum_has_not_Interval_in_Union_Closure
[ "Infinite Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Set of Sets", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Cardinality", "Definition:Cardinality of Continuum" ]
[ "Set of Subsets of Reals with Cardinality less than Continuum Cardinality of Local Minimums of Union Closure less than Continuum", "Cardinalities form Inequality implies Difference is Nonempty", "Definition:Empty Set", "Definition:Set Difference", "Definition:Local Minimum in Set of Reals", "Definition:Lo...
proofwiki-10874
Cardinality of Basis of Sorgenfrey Line not greater than Continuum
Let $T = \struct {\R, \tau}$ be the Sorgenfrey line. Let :$\BB = \set {\hointr x y: x, y \in \R \land x < y}$ be the basis of $T$. Then $\card \BB \le \mathfrak c$ where :$\card \BB$ denotes the cardinality of $\BB$ :$\mathfrak c = \card \R$ denotes the continuum.
Define a mapping $f: \BB \to \R \times \R$: :$\forall I \in \BB: \map f I = \tuple {\min I, \sup I}$ That is: :$\map f {\hointr x y} = \tuple {x, y} \forall x, y \in \R: x < y$ We will show that $f$ is an injection by definition. Let $I_1, I_2 \in \BB$ such that: :$\map f {I_1} = \map f {I_2}$ {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l =...
Let $T = \struct {\R, \tau}$ be the [[Definition:Sorgenfrey Line|Sorgenfrey line]]. Let :$\BB = \set {\hointr x y: x, y \in \R \land x < y}$ be the [[Definition:Analytic Basis|basis]] of $T$. Then $\card \BB \le \mathfrak c$ where :$\card \BB$ denotes the [[Definition:Cardinality|cardinality]] of $\BB$ :$\mathfrak ...
Define a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]] $f: \BB \to \R \times \R$: :$\forall I \in \BB: \map f I = \tuple {\min I, \sup I}$ That is: :$\map f {\hointr x y} = \tuple {x, y} \forall x, y \in \R: x < y$ We will show that $f$ is an [[Definition:Injection|injection]] by definition. Let $I_1, I_2 \in \BB$ such that: :$\m...
Cardinality of Basis of Sorgenfrey Line not greater than Continuum
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cardinality_of_Basis_of_Sorgenfrey_Line_not_greater_than_Continuum
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cardinality_of_Basis_of_Sorgenfrey_Line_not_greater_than_Continuum
[ "Sorgenfrey Line" ]
[ "Definition:Sorgenfrey Line", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis", "Definition:Cardinality", "Definition:Cardinality of Continuum" ]
[ "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Injection", "Definition:Injection", "Injection implies Cardinal Inequality", "Cardinal Product Equal to Maximum" ]
proofwiki-10875
Cardinalities form Inequality implies Difference is Nonempty
Let $X, Y$ be sets. Let :$\card X < \card Y$ where $\card X$ denotes the cardinality of $X$. Then: :$Y \setminus X \ne \O$
{{AimForCont}} that: :$Y \setminus X = \O$ Then by Set Difference with Superset is Empty Set: :$Y \subseteq X$ Hence by Subset implies Cardinal Inequality: :$\card Y \le \card X$ This contradicts: :$\card X < \card Y$ Hence the result. {{qed}}
Let $X, Y$ be [[Definition:Set|sets]]. Let :$\card X < \card Y$ where $\card X$ denotes the [[Definition:Cardinality|cardinality]] of $X$. Then: :$Y \setminus X \ne \O$
{{AimForCont}} that: :$Y \setminus X = \O$ Then by [[Set Difference with Superset is Empty Set]]: :$Y \subseteq X$ Hence by [[Subset implies Cardinal Inequality]]: :$\card Y \le \card X$ This [[Definition:Contradiction|contradicts]]: :$\card X < \card Y$ Hence the result. {{qed}}
Cardinalities form Inequality implies Difference is Nonempty
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cardinalities_form_Inequality_implies_Difference_is_Nonempty
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cardinalities_form_Inequality_implies_Difference_is_Nonempty
[ "Cardinals" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Cardinality" ]
[ "Set Difference with Superset is Empty Set", "Subset implies Cardinal Inequality", "Definition:Contradiction" ]
proofwiki-10876
Set of Subsets of Reals with Cardinality less than Continuum Cardinality of Local Minimums of Union Closure less than Continuum
Let $\BB$ be a set of subsets of $\R$. Let: :$\size \BB < \mathfrak c$ where :$\size \BB$ denotes the cardinality of $\BB$ :$\mathfrak c = \size \R$ denotes the cardinality of the continuum. Let :$X = \leftset {x \in \R: \exists U \in \set {\bigcup \GG: \GG \subseteq \BB}: x}$ is a local minimum in $\rightset U$ Then: ...
We will prove that: :$(1): \quad \size \BB \aleph_0 < \mathfrak c$ where $\aleph_0 = \size \N$ by Aleph Zero equals Cardinality of Naturals. In the case when $\size \BB = \mathbf 0$ we have by Zero of Cardinal Product is Zero: :$\size \BB \aleph_0 = \mathbf 0 < \mathfrak c$ In the case when $\mathbf 0 < \size \BB < \al...
Let $\BB$ be a [[Definition:Set of Sets|set]] of [[Definition:Subset|subsets]] of $\R$. Let: :$\size \BB < \mathfrak c$ where :$\size \BB$ denotes the [[Definition:Cardinality|cardinality]] of $\BB$ :$\mathfrak c = \size \R$ denotes the [[Definition:Cardinality of Continuum|cardinality of the continuum]]. Let :$X = \...
We will prove that: :$(1): \quad \size \BB \aleph_0 < \mathfrak c$ where $\aleph_0 = \size \N$ by [[Aleph Zero equals Cardinality of Naturals]]. In the case when $\size \BB = \mathbf 0$ we have by [[Zero of Cardinal Product is Zero]]: :$\size \BB \aleph_0 = \mathbf 0 < \mathfrak c$ In the case when $\mathbf 0 < \s...
Set of Subsets of Reals with Cardinality less than Continuum Cardinality of Local Minimums of Union Closure less than Continuum
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_of_Subsets_of_Reals_with_Cardinality_less_than_Continuum_Cardinality_of_Local_Minimums_of_Union_Closure_less_than_Continuum
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_of_Subsets_of_Reals_with_Cardinality_less_than_Continuum_Cardinality_of_Local_Minimums_of_Union_Closure_less_than_Continuum
[ "Infinite Sets", "Cardinality of Continuum", "Real Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Set of Sets", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Cardinality", "Definition:Cardinality of Continuum", "Definition:Local Minimum in Set of Reals" ]
[ "Aleph Zero equals Cardinality of Naturals", "Zero of Cardinal Product is Zero", "Product of Cardinals is Commutative", "Cardinal Product Equal to Maximum", "Aleph Zero is less than Cardinality of Continuum", "Cardinal Product Equal to Maximum", "Definition:Local Minimum in Set of Reals", "Definition:...
proofwiki-10877
Slope of Secant
Let $f: \R \to \R$ be a real function. Let the graph of $f$ be depicted on a Cartesian plane. :400px Let $AB$ be a secant of $f$ where: :$A = \tuple {x, \map f x}$ :$A = \tuple {x + h, \map f {x + h} }$ Then the slope of $AB$ is given by: :$\dfrac {\map f {x + h} - \map f x} h$
The slope of $AB$ is defined as the change in $y$ divided by the change in $x$. Between $A$ and $B$: :the change in $x$ is $\paren {x + h} - x = h$ :the change in $y$ is $\map f {x + h} - \map f x$. Hence the result. {{qed}}
Let $f: \R \to \R$ be a [[Definition:Real Function|real function]]. Let the [[Definition:Graph of Mapping|graph]] of $f$ be depicted on a [[Definition:Cartesian Plane|Cartesian plane]]. :[[File:SecantToCurve.png|400px]] Let $AB$ be a [[Definition:Secant of Curve|secant]] of $f$ where: :$A = \tuple {x, \map f x}$ :...
The [[Definition:Slope of Straight Line|slope]] of $AB$ is defined as the change in $y$ divided by the change in $x$. Between $A$ and $B$: :the change in $x$ is $\paren {x + h} - x = h$ :the change in $y$ is $\map f {x + h} - \map f x$. Hence the result. {{qed}}
Slope of Secant
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Slope_of_Secant
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Slope_of_Secant
[ "Analytic Geometry" ]
[ "Definition:Real Function", "Definition:Graph of Mapping", "Definition:Cartesian Plane", "File:SecantToCurve.png", "Definition:Secant Line", "Definition:Slope/Straight Line" ]
[ "Definition:Slope/Straight Line" ]
proofwiki-10878
Derivative of Curve at Point
Let $f: \R \to \R$ be a real function. Let the graph $G$ of $f$ be depicted on a Cartesian plane. Then the derivative of $f$ at $x = \xi$ is equal to the tangent to $G$ at $x = \xi$.
Let $f: \R \to \R$ be a real function. :400px Let the graph $G$ of $f$ be depicted on a Cartesian plane. Let $A = \tuple {\xi, \map f \xi}$ be a point on $G$. Consider the secant $AB$ to $G$ where $B = \tuple {\xi + h, \map f {\xi + h} }$. From Slope of Secant, the slope of $AB$ is given by: :$\dfrac {\map f {x + h} - ...
Let $f: \R \to \R$ be a [[Definition:Real Function|real function]]. Let the [[Definition:Graph of Mapping|graph]] $G$ of $f$ be depicted on a [[Definition:Cartesian Plane|Cartesian plane]]. Then the [[Definition:Derivative of Real Function at Point|derivative]] of $f$ at $x = \xi$ is equal to the [[Definition:Tangen...
Let $f: \R \to \R$ be a [[Definition:Real Function|real function]]. :[[File:DerivativeOfCurve.png|400px]] Let the [[Definition:Graph of Mapping|graph]] $G$ of $f$ be depicted on a [[Definition:Cartesian Plane|Cartesian plane]]. Let $A = \tuple {\xi, \map f \xi}$ be a [[Definition:Point|point]] on $G$. Consider ...
Derivative of Curve at Point
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Curve_at_Point
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Curve_at_Point
[ "Derivatives", "Differential Calculus", "Analytic Geometry" ]
[ "Definition:Real Function", "Definition:Graph of Mapping", "Definition:Cartesian Plane", "Definition:Derivative/Real Function/Derivative at Point", "Definition:Tangent Line" ]
[ "Definition:Real Function", "File:DerivativeOfCurve.png", "Definition:Graph of Mapping", "Definition:Cartesian Plane", "Definition:Point", "Definition:Secant Line", "Slope of Secant", "Definition:Slope/Straight Line", "Definition:Secant Line", "Definition:Tangent Line", "Definition:Limit of Real...
proofwiki-10879
Derivative of Square Function
Let $f: \R \to \R$ be the square function: :$\forall x \in \R: \map f x = x^2$ Then the derivative of $f$ is given by: :$\map {f'} x = 2 x$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {f'} x | r = \lim_{h \mathop \to 0} \frac {\map f {x + h} - \map f x} h | c = {{Defof|Derivative of Real Function at Point}} }} {{eqn | r = \lim_{h \mathop \to 0} \frac {\paren {x + h}^2 - x^2} h | c = }} {{eqn | r = \lim_{h \mathop \to 0} \frac {x^2 + 2 x h + h^2 - x^2...
Let $f: \R \to \R$ be the [[Definition:Square (Algebra)|square function]]: :$\forall x \in \R: \map f x = x^2$ Then the [[Definition:Derivative|derivative]] of $f$ is given by: :$\map {f'} x = 2 x$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {f'} x | r = \lim_{h \mathop \to 0} \frac {\map f {x + h} - \map f x} h | c = {{Defof|Derivative of Real Function at Point}} }} {{eqn | r = \lim_{h \mathop \to 0} \frac {\paren {x + h}^2 - x^2} h | c = }} {{eqn | r = \lim_{h \mathop \to 0} \frac {x^2 + 2 x h + h^2 - x^2...
Derivative of Square Function/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Square_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Square_Function/Proof_1
[ "Derivative of Square Function", "Derivatives", "Square Function" ]
[ "Definition:Square/Function", "Definition:Derivative" ]
[]
proofwiki-10880
Derivative of Square Function
Let $f: \R \to \R$ be the square function: :$\forall x \in \R: \map f x = x^2$ Then the derivative of $f$ is given by: :$\map {f'} x = 2 x$
From Power Rule for Derivatives: :$\map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {x^n} = n x^{n - 1}$ The result follows by setting $n = 2$. {{qed}}
Let $f: \R \to \R$ be the [[Definition:Square (Algebra)|square function]]: :$\forall x \in \R: \map f x = x^2$ Then the [[Definition:Derivative|derivative]] of $f$ is given by: :$\map {f'} x = 2 x$
From [[Power Rule for Derivatives]]: :$\map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {x^n} = n x^{n - 1}$ The result follows by setting $n = 2$. {{qed}}
Derivative of Square Function/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Square_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Square_Function/Proof_2
[ "Derivative of Square Function", "Derivatives", "Square Function" ]
[ "Definition:Square/Function", "Definition:Derivative" ]
[ "Power Rule for Derivatives" ]
proofwiki-10881
Countable iff Cardinality not greater than Aleph Zero
Let $X$ be set. $X$ is countable {{iff}}: $\card X \le \aleph_0$ where: :$\card X$ denotes the cardinality of $X$ :$\aleph_0 = \card \N$ by Aleph Zero equals Cardinality of Naturals.
:$X$ is countable {{iff}}: :there exists an injection $f: X \to \N$ by definition of countable set {{iff}}: :$\card X \le \card \N$ by Injection iff Cardinal Inequality {{iff}}: :$\card X \le \aleph_0$ {{qed}}
Let $X$ be [[Definition:Set|set]]. $X$ is [[Definition:Countable Set|countable]] {{iff}}: $\card X \le \aleph_0$ where: :$\card X$ denotes the [[Definition:Cardinality|cardinality]] of $X$ :$\aleph_0 = \card \N$ by [[Aleph Zero equals Cardinality of Naturals]].
:$X$ is [[Definition:Countable Set|countable]] {{iff}}: :there exists an [[Definition:Injection|injection]] $f: X \to \N$ by definition of [[Definition:Countable Set|countable set]] {{iff}}: :$\card X \le \card \N$ by [[Injection iff Cardinal Inequality]] {{iff}}: :$\card X \le \aleph_0$ {{qed}}
Countable iff Cardinality not greater than Aleph Zero
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Countable_iff_Cardinality_not_greater_than_Aleph_Zero
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Countable_iff_Cardinality_not_greater_than_Aleph_Zero
[ "Countable Sets", "Aleph Mapping" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Countable Set", "Definition:Cardinality", "Aleph Zero equals Cardinality of Naturals" ]
[ "Definition:Countable Set", "Definition:Injection", "Definition:Countable Set", "Injection iff Cardinal Inequality" ]
proofwiki-10882
Aleph Zero equals Cardinality of Naturals
$\aleph_0 = \card \N$ where :$\aleph$ denotes the aleph mapping, :$\card \N$ denotes the cardinality of $\N$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \aleph_0 | r = \card {\aleph_0} | c = Cardinal of Cardinal Equal to Cardinal }} {{eqn | r = \card {\omega} | c = {{Defof|Aleph Mapping}} }} {{eqn | r = \card {\N} | c = {{Defof|Natural Numbers|subdef = Construction}} }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
$\aleph_0 = \card \N$ where :$\aleph$ denotes the [[Definition:Aleph Mapping|aleph mapping]], :$\card \N$ denotes the [[Definition:Cardinality|cardinality]] of $\N$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \aleph_0 | r = \card {\aleph_0} | c = [[Cardinal of Cardinal Equal to Cardinal]] }} {{eqn | r = \card {\omega} | c = {{Defof|Aleph Mapping}} }} {{eqn | r = \card {\N} | c = {{Defof|Natural Numbers|subdef = Construction}} }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
Aleph Zero equals Cardinality of Naturals
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Aleph_Zero_equals_Cardinality_of_Naturals
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Aleph_Zero_equals_Cardinality_of_Naturals
[ "Aleph Mapping" ]
[ "Definition:Aleph Mapping", "Definition:Cardinality" ]
[ "Cardinal of Cardinal Equal to Cardinal" ]
proofwiki-10883
Distance Moved by Body from Rest under Constant Acceleration
Let a body $B$ be stationary. Let $B$ be subject to a constant acceleration. Then the distance travelled by $B$ is proportional to the square of the length of time $B$ is under the acceleration.
From Equations of Motion with Constant Acceleration: Distance after Time: :$\mathbf s = \mathbf u t + \dfrac {\mathbf a t^2} 2$ where: :$\mathbf s$ is the displacement of $B$ at time $t$ from its initial position at time $t$ :$\mathbf u$ is the velocity at time $t = 0$ :$\mathbf a$ is the constant acceleration $t$ In t...
Let a [[Definition:Body|body]] $B$ be [[Definition:Stationary|stationary]]. Let $B$ be subject to a [[Definition:Constant|constant]] [[Definition:Acceleration|acceleration]]. Then the [[Definition:Distance (Geometry)|distance]] travelled by $B$ is [[Definition:Proportion|proportional]] to the [[Definition:Square (Alg...
From [[Equations of Motion with Constant Acceleration/Distance after Time|Equations of Motion with Constant Acceleration: Distance after Time]]: :$\mathbf s = \mathbf u t + \dfrac {\mathbf a t^2} 2$ where: :$\mathbf s$ is the [[Definition:Displacement|displacement]] of $B$ at [[Definition:Time|time]] $t$ from its initi...
Distance Moved by Body from Rest under Constant Acceleration
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Distance_Moved_by_Body_from_Rest_under_Constant_Acceleration
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Distance_Moved_by_Body_from_Rest_under_Constant_Acceleration
[ "Equations of Motion with Constant Acceleration", "Mechanics" ]
[ "Definition:Body", "Definition:Stationary", "Definition:Constant", "Definition:Acceleration", "Definition:Distance (Geometry)", "Definition:Proportion", "Definition:Square/Function", "Definition:Time/Length", "Definition:Acceleration" ]
[ "Equations of Motion with Constant Acceleration/Distance after Time", "Definition:Displacement", "Definition:Time", "Definition:Time", "Definition:Velocity", "Definition:Time", "Definition:Constant", "Definition:Acceleration", "Definition:Magnitude", "Definition:Vector Quantity", "Definition:Pro...
proofwiki-10884
Equations of Motion with Constant Acceleration/Velocity after Time
:$\mathbf v = \mathbf u + \mathbf a t$
By definition of acceleration: :$\dfrac {\d \mathbf v} {\d t} = \mathbf a$ By Solution to Linear First Order Ordinary Differential Equation: :$\mathbf v = \mathbf c + \mathbf a t$ where $\mathbf c$ is a constant vector. We are given the initial condition: :$\bigvalueat {\mathbf v} {t \mathop = 0} = \mathbf u$ from whic...
:$\mathbf v = \mathbf u + \mathbf a t$
By definition of [[Definition:Acceleration|acceleration]]: :$\dfrac {\d \mathbf v} {\d t} = \mathbf a$ By [[Solution to Linear First Order Ordinary Differential Equation]]: :$\mathbf v = \mathbf c + \mathbf a t$ where $\mathbf c$ is a [[Definition:Constant|constant]] [[Definition:Vector|vector]]. We are given the [[D...
Equations of Motion with Constant Acceleration/Velocity after Time
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equations_of_Motion_with_Constant_Acceleration/Velocity_after_Time
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equations_of_Motion_with_Constant_Acceleration/Velocity_after_Time
[ "Equations of Motion with Constant Acceleration" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Acceleration", "Solution to Linear First Order Ordinary Differential Equation", "Definition:Constant", "Definition:Vector", "Definition:Initial Condition" ]
proofwiki-10885
Equations of Motion with Constant Acceleration/Distance after Time
:$\mathbf s = \mathbf u t + \dfrac {\mathbf a t^2} 2$
From Equations of Motion with Constant Acceleration: Velocity after Time: :$\mathbf v = \mathbf u + \mathbf a t$ By definition of velocity, this can be expressed as: :$\dfrac {\d \mathbf s} {\d t} = \mathbf u + \mathbf a t$ where both $\mathbf u$ and $\mathbf a$ are constant. By Solution to Linear First Order Ordinary ...
:$\mathbf s = \mathbf u t + \dfrac {\mathbf a t^2} 2$
From [[Equations of Motion with Constant Acceleration/Velocity after Time|Equations of Motion with Constant Acceleration: Velocity after Time]]: :$\mathbf v = \mathbf u + \mathbf a t$ By definition of [[Definition:Velocity|velocity]], this can be expressed as: :$\dfrac {\d \mathbf s} {\d t} = \mathbf u + \mathbf a t$ ...
Equations of Motion with Constant Acceleration/Distance after Time
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equations_of_Motion_with_Constant_Acceleration/Distance_after_Time
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equations_of_Motion_with_Constant_Acceleration/Distance_after_Time
[ "Equations of Motion with Constant Acceleration" ]
[]
[ "Equations of Motion with Constant Acceleration/Velocity after Time", "Definition:Velocity", "Definition:Constant", "Solution to Linear First Order Ordinary Differential Equation", "Definition:Constant", "Definition:Vector", "Definition:Initial Condition" ]
proofwiki-10886
Equations of Motion with Constant Acceleration/Velocity after Distance
:$\mathbf v \cdot \mathbf v = \mathbf u \cdot \mathbf u + 2 \mathbf a \cdot \mathbf s$
From Equations of Motion with Constant Acceleration: Velocity after Time :$\mathbf v = \mathbf u + \mathbf a t$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf v \cdot \mathbf v | r = \paren {\mathbf u + \mathbf a t} \cdot \paren {\mathbf u + \mathbf a t} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \mathbf u \cdot \mathbf u + \mathbf u ...
:$\mathbf v \cdot \mathbf v = \mathbf u \cdot \mathbf u + 2 \mathbf a \cdot \mathbf s$
From [[Equations of Motion with Constant Acceleration/Velocity after Time|Equations of Motion with Constant Acceleration: Velocity after Time]] :$\mathbf v = \mathbf u + \mathbf a t$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf v \cdot \mathbf v | r = \paren {\mathbf u + \mathbf a t} \cdot \paren {\mathbf u + \mathbf...
Equations of Motion with Constant Acceleration/Velocity after Distance
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equations_of_Motion_with_Constant_Acceleration/Velocity_after_Distance
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equations_of_Motion_with_Constant_Acceleration/Velocity_after_Distance
[ "Equations of Motion with Constant Acceleration" ]
[]
[ "Equations of Motion with Constant Acceleration/Velocity after Time", "Dot Product Distributes over Addition", "Dot Product Operator is Commutative", "Dot Product Associates with Scalar Multiplication", "Dot Product Distributes over Addition", "Equations of Motion with Constant Acceleration/Distance after...
proofwiki-10887
Aleph Zero is less than Cardinality of Continuum
$\aleph_0 < \mathfrak c$ where :$\aleph$ denotes the aleph mapping, :$\mathfrak c$ denotes the cardinality of the continuum.
By Power Set of Natural Numbers has Cardinality of Continuum: :$\mathfrak c = \card {\powerset \N}$ where: :$\powerset \N$ denotes the power set of $\N$ :$\card {\powerset \N}$ denotes the cardinality of $\powerset \N$. By Cardinality of Set less than Cardinality of Power Set: :$\card \N < \card {\powerset \N}$ Thus b...
$\aleph_0 < \mathfrak c$ where :$\aleph$ denotes the [[Definition:Aleph Mapping|aleph mapping]], :$\mathfrak c$ denotes the [[Definition:Cardinality of Continuum|cardinality of the continuum]].
By [[Power Set of Natural Numbers has Cardinality of Continuum]]: :$\mathfrak c = \card {\powerset \N}$ where: :$\powerset \N$ denotes the [[Definition:Power Set|power set]] of $\N$ :$\card {\powerset \N}$ denotes the [[Definition:Cardinality|cardinality]] of $\powerset \N$. By [[Cardinality of Set less than Cardinali...
Aleph Zero is less than Cardinality of Continuum
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Aleph_Zero_is_less_than_Cardinality_of_Continuum
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Aleph_Zero_is_less_than_Cardinality_of_Continuum
[ "Infinite Sets", "Aleph Mapping", "Cardinality of Continuum" ]
[ "Definition:Aleph Mapping", "Definition:Cardinality of Continuum" ]
[ "Power Set of Natural Numbers has Cardinality of Continuum", "Definition:Power Set", "Definition:Cardinality", "Cardinality of Set less than Cardinality of Power Set", "Aleph Zero equals Cardinality of Naturals" ]
proofwiki-10888
Cardinality of Set less than Cardinality of Power Set
Let $X$ be a set. Then: :$\card X < \card {\powerset X}$ where :$\card X$ denotes the cardinality of $X$, :$\powerset X$ denotes the power set of $X$.
By No Bijection from Set to its Power Set: : there exist no bijections $X \to \powerset X$ Then by definition of set equivalence: :$X \not\sim \powerset X$ Hence by definition of cardinality: :$(1): \quad \card X \ne \card {\powerset X}$ By Cardinality of Set of Singletons: :$(2): \quad \card {\set {\set {x}: x \in X} ...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. Then: :$\card X < \card {\powerset X}$ where :$\card X$ denotes the [[Definition:Cardinality|cardinality]] of $X$, :$\powerset X$ denotes the [[Definition:Power Set|power set]] of $X$.
By [[No Bijection from Set to its Power Set]]: : there exist no [[Definition:Bijection|bijections]] $X \to \powerset X$ Then by definition of [[Definition:Set Equivalence|set equivalence]]: :$X \not\sim \powerset X$ Hence by definition of [[Definition:Cardinality|cardinality]]: :$(1): \quad \card X \ne \card {\powers...
Cardinality of Set less than Cardinality of Power Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cardinality_of_Set_less_than_Cardinality_of_Power_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cardinality_of_Set_less_than_Cardinality_of_Power_Set
[ "Cardinals", "Power Set", "Cardinality" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Cardinality", "Definition:Power Set" ]
[ "No Bijection from Set to its Power Set", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Set Equivalence", "Definition:Cardinality", "Cardinality of Set of Singletons", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Power Set", "Definition:Subset", "Subset implies Cardinal Inequality" ]
proofwiki-10889
Volume of Solid of Revolution
Let $f: \R \to \R$ be a real function which is integrable on the interval $\closedint a b$. Let the points be defined: :$A = \tuple {a, \map f a}$ :$B = \tuple {b, \map f b}$ :$C = \tuple {b, 0}$ :$D = \tuple {a, 0}$ Let the figure $ABCD$ be defined as being bounded by the straight lines $y = 0$, $x = a$, $x = b$ and t...
:500px Consider a rectangle bounded by the lines: :$y = 0$ :$x = \xi$ :$x = \xi + \delta x$ :$y = \map f x$ Consider the right circular cylinder generated by revolving it about the $x$-axis. By Volume of Right Circular Cylinder, the volume of this cylinder is: :$V_\xi = \pi \paren {\map f x}^2 \delta x$ {{finish|Needs ...
Let $f: \R \to \R$ be a [[Definition:Real Function|real function]] which is [[Definition:Integrable Function|integrable]] on the [[Definition:Closed Real Interval|interval]] $\closedint a b$. Let the [[Definition:Point|points]] be defined: :$A = \tuple {a, \map f a}$ :$B = \tuple {b, \map f b}$ :$C = \tuple {b, 0}$ :$...
:[[File:VolumeOfSolidOfRevolution.png|500px]] Consider a [[Definition:Rectangle|rectangle]] bounded by the lines: :$y = 0$ :$x = \xi$ :$x = \xi + \delta x$ :$y = \map f x$ Consider the [[Definition:Right Circular Cylinder|right circular cylinder]] generated by revolving it about the [[Definition:X-Axis|$x$-axis]]. ...
Volume of Solid of Revolution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Volume_of_Solid_of_Revolution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Volume_of_Solid_of_Revolution
[ "Integral Calculus", "Solids of Revolution" ]
[ "Definition:Real Function", "Definition:Integrable Function", "Definition:Real Interval/Closed", "Definition:Point", "Definition:Geometric Figure/Plane Figure", "Definition:Line/Straight Line", "Definition:Line/Curve", "Definition:Solid of Revolution", "Definition:Axis/X-Axis", "Definition:Volume"...
[ "File:VolumeOfSolidOfRevolution.png", "Definition:Quadrilateral/Rectangle", "Definition:Right Circular Cylinder", "Definition:Axis/X-Axis", "Volume of Right Circular Cylinder", "Definition:Volume", "Definition:Right Circular Cylinder" ]
proofwiki-10890
Acceleration is Second Derivative of Displacement with respect to Time
The '''acceleration''' $\mathbf a$ of a body $M$ is the second derivative of the displacement $\mathbf s$ of $M$ from a given point of reference {{WRT|Differentiation}} time $t$: :$\mathbf a = \dfrac {\d^2 \mathbf s} {\d t^2}$
By definition, the acceleration of a body $M$ is defined as the first derivative of the velocity $\mathbf v$ of $M$ relative to a given point of reference {{WRT|Differentiation}} time: :$\mathbf a = \dfrac {\d \mathbf v} {\d t}$ Also by definition, the velocity of $M$ is defined as the first derivative of the displacem...
The '''[[Definition:Acceleration|acceleration]]''' $\mathbf a$ of a [[Definition:Body|body]] $M$ is the [[Definition:Second Derivative|second derivative]] of the [[Definition:Displacement|displacement]] $\mathbf s$ of $M$ from a given [[Definition:Point of Reference|point of reference]] {{WRT|Differentiation}} [[Defini...
By definition, the [[Definition:Acceleration|acceleration]] of a [[Definition:Body|body]] $M$ is defined as the [[Definition:Derivative|first derivative]] of the [[Definition:Velocity|velocity]] $\mathbf v$ of $M$ [[Definition:Relative Velocity|relative to]] a given [[Definition:Point of Reference|point of reference]] ...
Acceleration is Second Derivative of Displacement with respect to Time
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Acceleration_is_Second_Derivative_of_Displacement_with_respect_to_Time
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Acceleration_is_Second_Derivative_of_Displacement_with_respect_to_Time
[ "Mechanics", "Acceleration" ]
[ "Definition:Acceleration", "Definition:Body", "Definition:Derivative/Higher Derivatives/Second Derivative", "Definition:Displacement", "Definition:Frame of Reference/Point of Reference", "Definition:Time" ]
[ "Definition:Acceleration", "Definition:Body", "Definition:Derivative", "Definition:Velocity", "Definition:Relative Velocity", "Definition:Frame of Reference/Point of Reference", "Definition:Time", "Definition:Velocity", "Definition:Derivative", "Definition:Displacement", "Definition:Frame of Ref...
proofwiki-10891
Equation of Catenary/Cartesian/Formulation 1
The '''catenary''' is described by the equation: :$y = \dfrac {e^{a x} + e^{-a x} } {2 a} = \dfrac {\cosh a x} a$ where $a$ is a constant. The lowest point of the catenary is at $\tuple {0, \dfrac 1 a}$.
Let $\tuple {x, y}$ be an arbitrary point on the chain. Let $s$ be the length along the arc of the chain from the lowest point to $\tuple {x, y}$. Let $w_0$ be the linear mass density of the chain, that is, its weight per unit length. The section of chain between the lowest point and $\tuple {x, y}$ is in static equili...
The '''[[Definition:Catenary|catenary]]''' is described by the equation: :$y = \dfrac {e^{a x} + e^{-a x} } {2 a} = \dfrac {\cosh a x} a$ where $a$ is a [[Definition:Constant|constant]]. The lowest point of the [[Definition:Catenary|catenary]] is at $\tuple {0, \dfrac 1 a}$.
Let $\tuple {x, y}$ be an arbitrary [[Definition:Point|point]] on the [[Definition:Chain (Physics)|chain]]. Let $s$ be the [[Definition:Linear Measure|length]] along the [[Definition:Arc of Curve|arc]] of the [[Definition:Chain (Physics)|chain]] from the lowest point to $\tuple {x, y}$. Let $w_0$ be the [[Definition:...
Equation of Catenary/Cartesian/Formulation 1/Proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equation_of_Catenary/Cartesian/Formulation_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equation_of_Catenary/Cartesian/Formulation_1/Proof
[ "Catenary" ]
[ "Definition:Catenary", "Definition:Constant", "Definition:Catenary" ]
[ "Definition:Point", "Definition:Chain (Physics)", "Definition:Linear Measure", "Definition:Curve/Arc", "Definition:Chain (Physics)", "Definition:Mass Density/Linear", "Definition:Chain (Physics)", "Definition:Weight (Physics)", "Definition:Linear Measure", "Definition:Chain (Physics)", "Definiti...
proofwiki-10892
Equation of Catenary/Cartesian/Formulation 2
The '''catenary''' is described by the equation: :$y = \dfrac a 2 \paren {e^{x / a} + e^{-x / a} } = a \cosh \dfrac x a$ where $a$ is a constant. The lowest point of the chain is at $\tuple {0, a}$.
Take the equation of the catenary according to Formulation 1: :$y = \dfrac {e^{ax} + e^{-ax}} {2 a}$ Put this in a form which uses the hyperbolic cosine: :$y = \dfrac {\cosh a x} a$ Replace $a$ with $\dfrac 1 a$: :$y = a \cosh \dfrac x a$ Hence the result. {{qed}}
The '''[[Definition:Catenary|catenary]]''' is described by the [[Definition:Equation|equation]]: :$y = \dfrac a 2 \paren {e^{x / a} + e^{-x / a} } = a \cosh \dfrac x a$ where $a$ is a [[Definition:Constant|constant]]. The lowest point of the [[Definition:Chain (Physics)|chain]] is at $\tuple {0, a}$.
Take the equation of the [[Equation of Catenary/Cartesian/Formulation 1|catenary according to Formulation 1]]: :$y = \dfrac {e^{ax} + e^{-ax}} {2 a}$ Put this in a form which uses the [[Definition:Hyperbolic Cosine|hyperbolic cosine]]: :$y = \dfrac {\cosh a x} a$ Replace $a$ with $\dfrac 1 a$: :$y = a \cosh \dfrac x ...
Equation of Catenary/Cartesian/Formulation 2/Proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equation_of_Catenary/Cartesian/Formulation_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equation_of_Catenary/Cartesian/Formulation_2/Proof
[ "Catenary" ]
[ "Definition:Catenary", "Definition:Equation", "Definition:Constant", "Definition:Chain (Physics)" ]
[ "Equation of Catenary/Cartesian/Formulation 1", "Definition:Hyperbolic Cosine" ]
proofwiki-10893
Cardinality of Power Set is Invariant
Let $X, Y$ be sets. Let $\card X = \card Y$ where $\card X$ denotes the cardinality of $X$. Then: :$\card {\powerset X} = \card {\powerset Y}$ where $\powerset X$ denotes the power set of $X$.
By definition of cardinality: :$X \sim Y$ where $\sim$ denotes the set equivalence. Then by definition of set equivalence: : there exists a bijection $f: X \to Y$ By definition of bijection :$f$ is an injection and a surjection. By Mapping is Injection iff Direct Image Mapping is Injection: :the direct image mapping $\...
Let $X, Y$ be [[Definition:Set|sets]]. Let $\card X = \card Y$ where $\card X$ denotes the [[Definition:Cardinality|cardinality]] of $X$. Then: :$\card {\powerset X} = \card {\powerset Y}$ where $\powerset X$ denotes the [[Definition:Power Set|power set]] of $X$.
By definition of [[Definition:Cardinality|cardinality]]: :$X \sim Y$ where $\sim$ denotes the [[Definition:Set Equivalence|set equivalence]]. Then by definition of [[Definition:Set Equivalence|set equivalence]]: : there exists a [[Definition:Bijection|bijection]] $f: X \to Y$ By definition of [[Definition:Bijection|b...
Cardinality of Power Set is Invariant
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cardinality_of_Power_Set_is_Invariant
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cardinality_of_Power_Set_is_Invariant
[ "Cardinals", "Power Set" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Cardinality", "Definition:Power Set" ]
[ "Definition:Cardinality", "Definition:Set Equivalence", "Definition:Set Equivalence", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Injection", "Definition:Surjection", "Mapping is Injection iff Direct Image Mapping is Injection", "Definition:Direct Image Mapping/Mapping", "Definitio...
proofwiki-10894
Reals are Isomorphic to Dedekind Cuts
Let $\mathscr D$ be the set of all Dedekind cuts of the totally ordered set $\struct {\Q, \le}$. Define a mapping $f: \R \to \mathscr D$ as: :$\forall x \in \R: \map f x = \set {y \in \Q: y < x}$ Then $f$ is a bijection.
First, we will prove that: :$\forall x \in \R: \map f x \in \mathscr D$ Let $x \in \R$. It is to be proved that $\map f x$ is a proper subset of $\Q$ such that: :$(1): \quad \forall z \in \map f x: \forall y \in \Q: y < z \implies y \in \map f x$ :$(2): \quad \forall z \in \map f x: \exists y \in \map f x: z < y$ We ha...
Let $\mathscr D$ be the [[Definition:Set of Sets|set]] of all [[Definition:Dedekind Cut|Dedekind cuts]] of the [[Definition:Totally Ordered Set|totally ordered set]] $\struct {\Q, \le}$. Define a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]] $f: \R \to \mathscr D$ as: :$\forall x \in \R: \map f x = \set {y \in \Q: y < x}$ Then $f$ ...
First, we will prove that: :$\forall x \in \R: \map f x \in \mathscr D$ Let $x \in \R$. It is to be proved that $\map f x$ is a [[Definition:Proper Subset|proper subset]] of $\Q$ such that: :$(1): \quad \forall z \in \map f x: \forall y \in \Q: y < z \implies y \in \map f x$ :$(2): \quad \forall z \in \map f x: \exis...
Reals are Isomorphic to Dedekind Cuts
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reals_are_Isomorphic_to_Dedekind_Cuts
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reals_are_Isomorphic_to_Dedekind_Cuts
[ "Real Numbers", "Dedekind Cuts" ]
[ "Definition:Set of Sets", "Definition:Dedekind Cut", "Definition:Totally Ordered Set", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Bijection" ]
[ "Definition:Proper Subset", "Definition:Proper Subset", "Between two Real Numbers exists Rational Number", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Injection", "Definition:Surjection", "Definition:Injection", "Between two Real Numbers exists Rational Number", "Definition:Surjection", "Definition:Dedeki...
proofwiki-10895
Slope of Orthogonal Curves
Let $C_1$ and $C_2$ be curves in a cartesian plane. Let $C_1$ and $C_2$ intersect each other at $P$. Let the slope of $C_1$ and $C_2$ at $P$ be $m_1$ and $m_2$. Then $C_1$ and $C_2$ are orthogonal {{iff}}: :$m_1 = -\dfrac 1 {m_2}$
Let the slopes of $C_1$ and $C_2$ at $P$ be defined by the vectors $\mathbf v_1$ and $\mathbf v_2$ represented as column matrices: :$\mathbf v_1 = \begin{bmatrix} x_1 \\ y_1 \end{bmatrix} , \mathbf v_2 = \begin{bmatrix} x_2 \\ y_2 \end{bmatrix}$ By Non-Zero Vectors are Orthogonal iff Perpendicular: :$\mathbf v_1 \cdot ...
Let $C_1$ and $C_2$ be [[Definition:Curve|curves]] in a [[Definition:Cartesian Plane|cartesian plane]]. Let $C_1$ and $C_2$ [[Definition:Intersection (Geometry)|intersect]] each other at $P$. Let the [[Definition:Slope|slope]] of $C_1$ and $C_2$ at $P$ be $m_1$ and $m_2$. Then $C_1$ and $C_2$ are [[Definition:Ortho...
Let the [[Definition:Slope|slopes]] of $C_1$ and $C_2$ at $P$ be defined by the [[Definition:Vector|vectors]] $\mathbf v_1$ and $\mathbf v_2$ represented as [[Definition:Column Matrix|column matrices]]: :$\mathbf v_1 = \begin{bmatrix} x_1 \\ y_1 \end{bmatrix} , \mathbf v_2 = \begin{bmatrix} x_2 \\ y_2 \end{bmatrix}$ B...
Slope of Orthogonal Curves
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Slope_of_Orthogonal_Curves
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Slope_of_Orthogonal_Curves
[ "Analytic Geometry" ]
[ "Definition:Line/Curve", "Definition:Cartesian Plane", "Definition:Intersection (Geometry)", "Definition:Slope", "Definition:Orthogonal Curves" ]
[ "Definition:Slope", "Definition:Vector", "Definition:Column Matrix", "Non-Zero Vectors are Orthogonal iff Perpendicular", "Definition:Orthogonal Curves", "Definition:Dot Product", "Category:Analytic Geometry" ]
proofwiki-10896
Orthogonal Trajectories/Examples/Concentric Circles
Consider the one-parameter family of curves: :$(1): \quad x^2 + y^2 = c$ Its family of orthogonal trajectories is given by the equation: :$y = c x$ :500px
We use the technique of formation of ordinary differential equation by elimination. Differentiating $(1)$ {{WRT|Differentiation}} $x$ gives: :$2 x + 2 y \dfrac {\d y} {\d x} = 0$ from which: :$\dfrac {\d y} {\d x} = -\dfrac x y$ Thus from Orthogonal Trajectories of One-Parameter Family of Curves, the family of orthogon...
Consider the [[Definition:One-Parameter Family of Curves|one-parameter family of curves]]: :$(1): \quad x^2 + y^2 = c$ Its [[Definition:Orthogonal Trajectories|family of orthogonal trajectories]] is given by the equation: :$y = c x$ :[[File:ConcentricCirclesOrthogonalTrajectories.png|500px]]
We use the technique of [[Definition:Formation of Ordinary Differential Equation by Elimination|formation of ordinary differential equation by elimination]]. [[Definition:Differentiation|Differentiating]] $(1)$ {{WRT|Differentiation}} $x$ gives: :$2 x + 2 y \dfrac {\d y} {\d x} = 0$ from which: :$\dfrac {\d y} {\d x}...
Orthogonal Trajectories/Examples/Concentric Circles
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Orthogonal_Trajectories/Examples/Concentric_Circles
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Orthogonal_Trajectories/Examples/Concentric_Circles
[ "Examples of Orthogonal Trajectories", "Circles" ]
[ "Definition:Family of Curves/One-Parameter", "Definition:Orthogonal Trajectories", "File:ConcentricCirclesOrthogonalTrajectories.png" ]
[ "Definition:Formation of Ordinary Differential Equation by Elimination", "Definition:Differentiation", "Orthogonal Trajectories of One-Parameter Family of Curves", "Definition:Orthogonal Trajectories", "Solution to Separable Differential Equation", "Primitive of Reciprocal" ]
proofwiki-10897
Angle of Tangent to Radius in Polar Coordinates
Let $C$ be a curve embedded in a plane defined by polar coordinates. Let $P$ be the point at $\polar {r, \theta}$. Then the angle $\psi$ made by the tangent to $C$ at $P$ with the radial coordinate is given by: :$\tan \psi = r \dfrac {\d \theta} {\d r}$
:400px {{ProofWanted}}
Let $C$ be a [[Definition:Curve|curve]] embedded in a [[Definition:Plane|plane]] defined by [[Definition:Polar Coordinates|polar coordinates]]. Let $P$ be the [[Definition:Point|point]] at $\polar {r, \theta}$. Then the [[Definition:Angle|angle]] $\psi$ made by the [[Definition:Tangent Line|tangent]] to $C$ at $P$ wi...
:[[File:TangentToRadiusPolar.png|400px]] {{ProofWanted}}
Angle of Tangent to Radius in Polar Coordinates
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Angle_of_Tangent_to_Radius_in_Polar_Coordinates
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Angle_of_Tangent_to_Radius_in_Polar_Coordinates
[ "Analytic Geometry", "Polar Coordinates", "Tangents" ]
[ "Definition:Line/Curve", "Definition:Plane Surface", "Definition:Polar Coordinates", "Definition:Point", "Definition:Angle", "Definition:Tangent Line", "Definition:Polar Coordinates/Radial Coordinate" ]
[ "File:TangentToRadiusPolar.png" ]
proofwiki-10898
Orthogonal Trajectories/Examples/Circles Tangent to Y Axis
Consider the one-parameter family of curves: :$(1): \quad x^2 + y^2 = 2 c x$ which describes the loci of circles tangent to the $y$-axis at the origin. Its family of orthogonal trajectories is given by the equation: :$x^2 + y^2 = 2 c y$ which describes the loci of circles tangent to the $x$-axis at the origin. :600px
We use the technique of formation of ordinary differential equation by elimination. Differentiating $(1)$ {{WRT|Differentiation}} $x$ gives: :$2 x + 2 y \dfrac {\d y} {\d x} = 2 c$ from which: :$\dfrac {\d y} {\d x} = \dfrac {y^2 - x^2} {2 x y}$ Thus from Orthogonal Trajectories of One-Parameter Family of Curves, the f...
Consider the [[Definition:One-Parameter Family of Curves|one-parameter family of curves]]: :$(1): \quad x^2 + y^2 = 2 c x$ which describes the [[Definition:Locus|loci]] of [[Definition:Circle|circles]] [[Definition:Tangent Line|tangent]] to the [[Definition:Y-Axis|$y$-axis]] at the [[Definition:Origin|origin]]. Its ...
We use the technique of [[Definition:Formation of Ordinary Differential Equation by Elimination|formation of ordinary differential equation by elimination]]. [[Definition:Differentiation|Differentiating]] $(1)$ {{WRT|Differentiation}} $x$ gives: :$2 x + 2 y \dfrac {\d y} {\d x} = 2 c$ from which: :$\dfrac {\d y} {\d ...
Orthogonal Trajectories/Examples/Circles Tangent to Y Axis/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Orthogonal_Trajectories/Examples/Circles_Tangent_to_Y_Axis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Orthogonal_Trajectories/Examples/Circles_Tangent_to_Y_Axis/Proof_1
[ "Examples of Orthogonal Trajectories", "Circles", "Circles Tangent to Y Axis" ]
[ "Definition:Family of Curves/One-Parameter", "Definition:Locus", "Definition:Circle", "Definition:Tangent Line", "Definition:Axis/Y-Axis", "Definition:Coordinate System/Origin", "Definition:Orthogonal Trajectories", "Definition:Locus", "Definition:Circle", "Definition:Tangent Line", "Definition:...
[ "Definition:Formation of Ordinary Differential Equation by Elimination", "Definition:Differentiation", "Orthogonal Trajectories of One-Parameter Family of Curves", "Definition:Orthogonal Trajectories", "Definition:Homogeneous Function/Real Space", "Definition:Homogeneous Function/Real Space/Degree", "De...
proofwiki-10899
Orthogonal Trajectories/Examples/Circles Tangent to Y Axis
Consider the one-parameter family of curves: :$(1): \quad x^2 + y^2 = 2 c x$ which describes the loci of circles tangent to the $y$-axis at the origin. Its family of orthogonal trajectories is given by the equation: :$x^2 + y^2 = 2 c y$ which describes the loci of circles tangent to the $x$-axis at the origin. :600px
We use the technique of formation of ordinary differential equation by elimination. Expressing $(1)$ in polar coordinates, we have: :$(2): \quad r = 2 c \cos \theta$ Differentiating $(1)$ {{WRT|Differentiation}} $\theta$ gives: :$(3): \quad \dfrac {\d r} {\d \theta} = -2 c \sin \theta$ Eliminating $c$ from $(2)$ and $(...
Consider the [[Definition:One-Parameter Family of Curves|one-parameter family of curves]]: :$(1): \quad x^2 + y^2 = 2 c x$ which describes the [[Definition:Locus|loci]] of [[Definition:Circle|circles]] [[Definition:Tangent Line|tangent]] to the [[Definition:Y-Axis|$y$-axis]] at the [[Definition:Origin|origin]]. Its ...
We use the technique of [[Definition:Formation of Ordinary Differential Equation by Elimination|formation of ordinary differential equation by elimination]]. Expressing $(1)$ in [[Definition:Polar Coordinates|polar coordinates]], we have: :$(2): \quad r = 2 c \cos \theta$ [[Definition:Differentiation|Differentiating]...
Orthogonal Trajectories/Examples/Circles Tangent to Y Axis/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Orthogonal_Trajectories/Examples/Circles_Tangent_to_Y_Axis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Orthogonal_Trajectories/Examples/Circles_Tangent_to_Y_Axis/Proof_2
[ "Examples of Orthogonal Trajectories", "Circles", "Circles Tangent to Y Axis" ]
[ "Definition:Family of Curves/One-Parameter", "Definition:Locus", "Definition:Circle", "Definition:Tangent Line", "Definition:Axis/Y-Axis", "Definition:Coordinate System/Origin", "Definition:Orthogonal Trajectories", "Definition:Locus", "Definition:Circle", "Definition:Tangent Line", "Definition:...
[ "Definition:Formation of Ordinary Differential Equation by Elimination", "Definition:Polar Coordinates", "Definition:Differentiation", "Orthogonal Trajectories of One-Parameter Family of Curves", "Definition:Orthogonal Trajectories", "Solution to Separable Differential Equation", "Primitive of Reciproca...