id
stringlengths
11
15
title
stringlengths
7
171
problem
stringlengths
9
4.33k
solution
stringlengths
6
19k
problem_wikitext
stringlengths
9
4.42k
solution_wikitext
stringlengths
7
19.1k
proof_title
stringlengths
9
171
theorem_url
stringlengths
34
198
proof_url
stringlengths
36
198
categories
listlengths
0
9
theorem_references
listlengths
0
36
proof_references
listlengths
0
253
proofwiki-13400
Substitution in Big-O Estimate/Real Analysis
Let $f$ and $g$ be real-valued or complex-valued functions defined on a neighborhood of $+ \infty$ in $\R$. Let $f = \map \OO g$, where $\OO$ denotes big-O notation. Let $h$ be a real-valued defined on a neighborhood of $+ \infty$ in $\R$. Let $\ds \lim_{x \mathop \to +\infty} \map h x = +\infty$. Then: :$f \circ h = \...
{{ProofWanted}} Category:Big-O Notation 3p4oafq4g08ec0l09shqdiyoizg7y1n
Let $f$ and $g$ be [[Definition:Real-Valued Function|real-valued]] or [[Definition:Complex-Valued Function|complex-valued functions]] defined on a [[Definition:Neighborhood of Positive Infinity|neighborhood of $+ \infty$]] in $\R$. Let $f = \map \OO g$, where $\OO$ denotes [[Definition:Big-O Notation|big-O notation]]....
{{ProofWanted}} [[Category:Big-O Notation]] 3p4oafq4g08ec0l09shqdiyoizg7y1n
Substitution in Big-O Estimate/Real Analysis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Substitution_in_Big-O_Estimate/Real_Analysis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Substitution_in_Big-O_Estimate/Real_Analysis
[ "Big-O Notation" ]
[ "Definition:Real-Valued Function", "Definition:Complex-Valued Function", "Definition:Neighborhood of Infinity (Real Analysis)/Positive Infinity", "Definition:Big-O Notation", "Definition:Real-Valued Function", "Definition:Neighborhood of Infinity (Real Analysis)/Positive Infinity" ]
[ "Category:Big-O Notation" ]
proofwiki-13401
Product of Big-O Estimates/Sequences
Let $\sequence {a_n}, \sequence {b_n}, \sequence {c_n}, \sequence {d_n}$ be sequences of real or complex numbers. Let: :$a_n = \map \OO {b_n}$ :$c_n = \map \OO {d_n}$ where $\OO$ denotes big-$\OO$ notation. Then: :$a_n c_n = \map \OO {b_n d_n}$
Since: :$a_n = \map \OO {b_n}$ there exists a positive real number $C_1$ and natural number $N_1$ such that: :$\size {a_n} \le C_1 \size {b_n}$ for all $n \ge N_1$. Similarly, since: :$c_n = \map \OO {d_n}$ there exists a positive real number $C_2$ and natural number $N_2$ such that: :$\size {c_n} \le C_2 \size {d_...
Let $\sequence {a_n}, \sequence {b_n}, \sequence {c_n}, \sequence {d_n}$ be [[Definition:Sequence|sequences]] of [[Definition:Real Number|real]] or [[Definition:Complex Number|complex numbers]]. Let: :$a_n = \map \OO {b_n}$ :$c_n = \map \OO {d_n}$ where $\OO$ denotes [[Definition:Big-O Notation|big-$\OO$ notation]]. ...
Since: :$a_n = \map \OO {b_n}$ there exists a [[Definition:Positive Real Number|positive real number]] $C_1$ and [[Definition:Natural Number|natural number]] $N_1$ such that: :$\size {a_n} \le C_1 \size {b_n}$ for all $n \ge N_1$. Similarly, since: :$c_n = \map \OO {d_n}$ there exists a [[Definition:Positive ...
Product of Big-O Estimates/Sequences
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_of_Big-O_Estimates/Sequences
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_of_Big-O_Estimates/Sequences
[ "Big-O Notation" ]
[ "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Complex Number", "Definition:Big-O Notation" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Real Number", "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Positive/Real Number", "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Category:Big-O Notation" ]
proofwiki-13402
Equivalence of Definitions of Order of Entire Function
Let $f: \C \to \C$ be an entire function. Let $\ln$ denote the natural logarithm. {{TFAE|def = Order of Entire Function}}
Let: :$\alpha_1 = \ds \limsup_{R \mathop \to \infty} \frac {\ds \ln \ln \max_{\cmod z \mathop \le R} \cmod f} {\ln R}$ :$\alpha_2 = \inf \set {\beta \ge 0: \ds \map \ln {\max_{\cmod z \mathop \le R} \cmod {\map f z} } = \map \OO {R^\beta} }$ :$\alpha_3 = \inf \set {\beta \ge 0: \map f z = \map \OO {\map \exp {\cmod z^\...
Let $f: \C \to \C$ be an [[Definition:Entire Function|entire function]]. Let $\ln$ denote the [[Definition:Natural Logarithm|natural logarithm]]. {{TFAE|def = Order of Entire Function}}
Let: :$\alpha_1 = \ds \limsup_{R \mathop \to \infty} \frac {\ds \ln \ln \max_{\cmod z \mathop \le R} \cmod f} {\ln R}$ :$\alpha_2 = \inf \set {\beta \ge 0: \ds \map \ln {\max_{\cmod z \mathop \le R} \cmod {\map f z} } = \map \OO {R^\beta} }$ :$\alpha_3 = \inf \set {\beta \ge 0: \map f z = \map \OO {\map \exp {\cmod z^\...
Equivalence of Definitions of Order of Entire Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Order_of_Entire_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Order_of_Entire_Function
[ "Order of Entire Function" ]
[ "Definition:Entire Function", "Definition:Natural Logarithm" ]
[]
proofwiki-13403
Sum of Big-O Estimates/Sequences
Let $\sequence {a_n},\sequence {b_n},\sequence {c_n},\sequence {d_n}$ be sequences of real or complex numbers. Let: :$a_n = \map \OO {b_n}$ :$c_n = \map \OO {d_n}$ where $\OO$ denotes big-$\OO$ notation. Then: :$a_n + c_n = \map \OO {\size {b_n} + \size {d_n} }$
Since: :$a_n = \map \OO {b_n}$ there exists a positive real number $C_1$ and natural number $N_1$ such that: :$\size {a_n} \le C_1 \size {b_n}$ for all $n \ge N_1$. Similarly, since: :$c_n = \map \OO {d_n}$ there exists a positive real number $C_2$ and natural number $N_2$ such that: :$\size {c_n} \le C_2 \size {d_...
Let $\sequence {a_n},\sequence {b_n},\sequence {c_n},\sequence {d_n}$ be [[Definition:Sequence|sequences]] of [[Definition:Real Number|real]] or [[Definition:Complex Number|complex numbers]]. Let: :$a_n = \map \OO {b_n}$ :$c_n = \map \OO {d_n}$ where $\OO$ denotes [[Definition:Big-O Notation|big-$\OO$ notation]]. Th...
Since: :$a_n = \map \OO {b_n}$ there exists a [[Definition:Positive Real Number|positive real number]] $C_1$ and [[Definition:Natural Number|natural number]] $N_1$ such that: :$\size {a_n} \le C_1 \size {b_n}$ for all $n \ge N_1$. Similarly, since: :$c_n = \map \OO {d_n}$ there exists a [[Definition:Positive ...
Sum of Big-O Estimates/Sequences
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Big-O_Estimates/Sequences
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Big-O_Estimates/Sequences
[ "Big-O Notation" ]
[ "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Complex Number", "Definition:Big-O Notation" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Real Number", "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Positive/Real Number", "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Triangle Inequality", "Category:Big-O Notation" ]
proofwiki-13404
Little-O Times Big-O is Little-O/Sequences
Let $\sequence {a_n}, \sequence {b_n}, \sequence {c_n}, \sequence {d_n}$ be sequences of real or complex numbers. Let: :$a_n = \map \OO {b_n}$ :$c_n = \map {\mathcal o} {d_n}$ where: :$\OO$ denotes big-$\OO$ notation :$\mathcal o$ denotes little-$\mathcal o$ notation. Then: :$a_n c_n = \map {\mathcal o} {b_n d_n}$
Let $\epsilon \in \R_{> 0}$. Since $a_n = \map \OO {b_n}$: :$\exists c \in \R: c \ge 0: \exists n_0 \in \N: \paren {n \ge n_0 \implies \size {a_n} \le c \cdot \size {b_n} }$ Since $c_n = \map {\mathcal o} {d_n}$: :$\exists n_1 \in \N: \paren {n \ge n_1 \implies \size {c_n} \le \dfrac \epsilon {c + 1} \cdot \size {d_n} ...
Let $\sequence {a_n}, \sequence {b_n}, \sequence {c_n}, \sequence {d_n}$ be [[Definition:Sequence|sequences]] of [[Definition:Real Number|real]] or [[Definition:Complex Number|complex numbers]]. Let: :$a_n = \map \OO {b_n}$ :$c_n = \map {\mathcal o} {d_n}$ where: :$\OO$ denotes [[Definition:Big-O Notation|big-$\OO$ no...
Let $\epsilon \in \R_{> 0}$. Since $a_n = \map \OO {b_n}$: :$\exists c \in \R: c \ge 0: \exists n_0 \in \N: \paren {n \ge n_0 \implies \size {a_n} \le c \cdot \size {b_n} }$ Since $c_n = \map {\mathcal o} {d_n}$: :$\exists n_1 \in \N: \paren {n \ge n_1 \implies \size {c_n} \le \dfrac \epsilon {c + 1} \cdot \size {d_n...
Little-O Times Big-O is Little-O/Sequences
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Little-O_Times_Big-O_is_Little-O/Sequences
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Little-O_Times_Big-O_is_Little-O/Sequences
[ "Big-O Notation", "Little-O Notation" ]
[ "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Complex Number", "Definition:Big-O Notation", "Definition:Little-O Notation" ]
[ "Category:Big-O Notation", "Category:Little-O Notation" ]
proofwiki-13405
Field Norm of Complex Number Equals Field Norm
Let $z = a + i b$ be a complex number, where $a, b \in \R$. Then the field norm of $z$ is the field norm with respect to the field extension $\C / \R$.
{{ProofWanted}} Category:Field Extensions Category:Field Norm of Complex Number 0i5v8vch6mvpd11ja0d3gdrgpmfcvbj
Let $z = a + i b$ be a [[Definition:Complex Number|complex number]], where $a, b \in \R$. Then the [[Definition:Field Norm of Complex Number|field norm]] of $z$ is the [[Definition:Field Norm|field norm]] with respect to the [[Definition:Field Extension|field extension]] $\C / \R$.
{{ProofWanted}} [[Category:Field Extensions]] [[Category:Field Norm of Complex Number]] 0i5v8vch6mvpd11ja0d3gdrgpmfcvbj
Field Norm of Complex Number Equals Field Norm
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Field_Norm_of_Complex_Number_Equals_Field_Norm
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Field_Norm_of_Complex_Number_Equals_Field_Norm
[ "Field Extensions", "Field Norm of Complex Number" ]
[ "Definition:Complex Number", "Definition:Field Norm of Complex Number", "Definition:Field Norm", "Definition:Field Extension" ]
[ "Category:Field Extensions", "Category:Field Norm of Complex Number" ]
proofwiki-13406
Big-O Notation for Sequences Coincides with General Definition
Let $\sequence {a_n}$ and $\sequence {b_n}$ be sequences of real or complex numbers. Let $\N$ be given the discrete topology. {{TFAE}} :$(1): \quad a_n = \map \OO {b_n}$, where $\OO$ denotes big-$\OO$ notation for sequences :$(2): \quad a_n = \map \OO {b_n}$, where $\OO$ stands for the general definition of big-$\OO$ n...
{{ProofWanted}} Category:Big-O Notation k2irag1srvyqutfx9i6bgs5dh0bu1mm
Let $\sequence {a_n}$ and $\sequence {b_n}$ be [[Definition:Sequence|sequences]] of [[Definition:Real Number|real]] or [[Definition:Complex Number|complex numbers]]. Let $\N$ be given the [[Definition:Discrete Topology|discrete topology]]. {{TFAE}} :$(1): \quad a_n = \map \OO {b_n}$, where $\OO$ denotes [[Definition...
{{ProofWanted}} [[Category:Big-O Notation]] k2irag1srvyqutfx9i6bgs5dh0bu1mm
Big-O Notation for Sequences Coincides with General Definition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Big-O_Notation_for_Sequences_Coincides_with_General_Definition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Big-O_Notation_for_Sequences_Coincides_with_General_Definition
[ "Big-O Notation" ]
[ "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Complex Number", "Definition:Discrete Topology", "Definition:Big-O Notation/Sequence", "Definition:Big-O Notation/General Definition" ]
[ "Category:Big-O Notation" ]
proofwiki-13407
Penholodigital Square Equation
The following equations, which include each digit from $1$ to $9$ inclusive, are the only ones of their kind: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 567^2 | r = 321 \, 489 }} {{eqn | l = 854^2 | r = 729 \, 316 }} {{end-eqn}}
The square of a $2$-digit integer cannot have more than $4$ digits: :$99^2 = 9801$ The square of a $4$-digit integer has at least $7$ digits: :$1000^2 = 1 \, 000 \, 000$ Hence we only need to inspect $3$-digit integers, with a corresponding $6$-digit square. A lower bound is given by $\ceiling {\sqrt {123 \, 456}} = 35...
The following [[Definition:Equation|equations]], which include each [[Definition:Digit|digit]] from $1$ to $9$ inclusive, are the only ones of their kind: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 567^2 | r = 321 \, 489 }} {{eqn | l = 854^2 | r = 729 \, 316 }} {{end-eqn}}
The [[Definition:Square (Algebra)|square]] of a $2$-[[Definition:Digit|digit]] [[Definition:Integer|integer]] cannot have more than $4$ [[Definition:Digit|digits]]: :$99^2 = 9801$ The [[Definition:Square (Algebra)|square]] of a $4$-[[Definition:Digit|digit]] [[Definition:Integer|integer]] has at least $7$ [[Definition...
Penholodigital Square Equation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Penholodigital_Square_Equation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Penholodigital_Square_Equation
[ "Square Numbers", "Recreational Mathematics", "Penholodigital Sets", "Penholodigital Integers" ]
[ "Definition:Equation", "Definition:Digit" ]
[ "Definition:Square/Function", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Square/Function", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Square/Function", "Definition:Digi...
proofwiki-13408
Bounded iff Big-O of 1/Sequences
Let $\sequence {a_n}$ be a sequence of real or complex numbers. {{TFAE}} :$(1): \quad a_n$ is bounded :$(2): \quad a_n = \map \OO 1$, where $\OO$ denotes big-$\OO$ notation
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a_n | o = \text {is} | r = \text {bounded} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | q = \exists k \in \R | l = \size {a_n} | o = \le | r = k | c = {{Defof|Bounded Sequence}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | q = \exists k \in \R | l = \size {a_n} ...
Let $\sequence {a_n}$ be a [[Definition:Sequence|sequence]] of [[Definition:Real Number|real]] or [[Definition:Complex Number|complex numbers]]. {{TFAE}} :$(1): \quad a_n$ is [[Definition:Bounded Sequence|bounded]] :$(2): \quad a_n = \map \OO 1$, where $\OO$ denotes [[Definition:Big-O Notation for Sequences|big-$\O...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a_n | o = \text {is} | r = \text {bounded} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | q = \exists k \in \R | l = \size {a_n} | o = \le | r = k | c = {{Defof|Bounded Sequence}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | q = \exists k \in \R | l = \size {a_n} ...
Bounded iff Big-O of 1/Sequences
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Bounded_iff_Big-O_of_1/Sequences
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Bounded_iff_Big-O_of_1/Sequences
[ "Big-O Notation" ]
[ "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Complex Number", "Definition:Bounded Sequence", "Definition:Big-O Notation/Sequence" ]
[ "Category:Big-O Notation" ]
proofwiki-13409
Sequence of 11 Primes by Trebling and Adding 16
The process of multiplication by $3$ and then adding $16$ produces a sequence of $11$ primes when starting from $587$: :$587, 1777, 5347, 16 \, 057, 48 \, 187, 144 \, 577, 433 \, 747, 1 \, 301 \, 257, 3 \, 903 \, 787, 11 \, 711 \, 377, 35 \, 134 \, 147$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = 587 | c = is prime }} {{eqn | l = 3 \times 587 + 16 | r = 1777 | c = which is prime }} {{eqn | l = 3 \times 1777 + 16 | r = 5347 | c = which is prime }} {{eqn | l = 3 \times 5347 + 16 | r = 16 \, 057 | c = which is prime }} {{eqn | l = 3 \...
The process of [[Definition:Integer Multiplication|multiplication]] by $3$ and then adding $16$ produces a [[Definition:Integer Sequence|sequence]] of $11$ [[Definition:Prime Number|primes]] when starting from $587$: :$587, 1777, 5347, 16 \, 057, 48 \, 187, 144 \, 577, 433 \, 747, 1 \, 301 \, 257, 3 \, 903 \, 787, 11 ...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = 587 | c = is [[Definition:Prime Number|prime]] }} {{eqn | l = 3 \times 587 + 16 | r = 1777 | c = which is [[Definition:Prime Number|prime]] }} {{eqn | l = 3 \times 1777 + 16 | r = 5347 | c = which is [[Definition:Prime Number|prime]] }} {{eqn | l = 3 ...
Sequence of 11 Primes by Trebling and Adding 16
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sequence_of_11_Primes_by_Trebling_and_Adding_16
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sequence_of_11_Primes_by_Trebling_and_Adding_16
[ "Prime Numbers", "Polynomial Expressions for Primes" ]
[ "Definition:Multiplication/Integers", "Definition:Integer Sequence", "Definition:Prime Number" ]
[ "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number",...
proofwiki-13410
Sum of Little-O Estimates/Sequences
Let $\sequence {a_n}, \sequence {b_n}, \sequence {c_n}, \sequence {d_n}$ be sequences of real or complex numbers. Let: :$a_n = \map \oo {b_n}$ :$c_n = \map \oo {d_n}$ where $\oo$ denotes little-$\oo$ notation. Then: :$a_n + c_n = \map \oo {\size {b_n} + \size {d_n} }$
Let $\epsilon > 0$. Then by definition of little-$\oo$ notation: :$\exists n_1 \in \N: \paren {n \ge n_1 \implies \size {a_n} \le \epsilon \cdot \size {b_n}}$ :$\exists n_2 \in \N: \paren {n \ge n_2 \implies \size {c_n} \le \epsilon \cdot \size {d_n}}$ For $n \ge \max \set {n_1, n_2}$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \size {...
Let $\sequence {a_n}, \sequence {b_n}, \sequence {c_n}, \sequence {d_n}$ be [[Definition:Sequence|sequences]] of [[Definition:Real Number|real]] or [[Definition:Complex Number|complex numbers]]. Let: :$a_n = \map \oo {b_n}$ :$c_n = \map \oo {d_n}$ where $\oo$ denotes [[Definition:Little-O Notation for Sequences|little...
Let $\epsilon > 0$. Then by definition of [[Definition:Little-O Notation for Sequences|little-$\oo$ notation]]: :$\exists n_1 \in \N: \paren {n \ge n_1 \implies \size {a_n} \le \epsilon \cdot \size {b_n}}$ :$\exists n_2 \in \N: \paren {n \ge n_2 \implies \size {c_n} \le \epsilon \cdot \size {d_n}}$ For $n \ge \max \s...
Sum of Little-O Estimates/Sequences
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Little-O_Estimates/Sequences
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Little-O_Estimates/Sequences
[ "Little-O Notation" ]
[ "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Complex Number", "Definition:Little-O Notation/Sequence" ]
[ "Definition:Little-O Notation/Sequence", "Triangle Inequality", "Definition:Absolute Value", "Definition:Positive/Real Number", "Definition:Little-O Notation/Sequence", "Category:Little-O Notation" ]
proofwiki-13411
Equivalence of Definitions of Asymptotically Equal Sequences
Let $\sequence {a_n}$ and $\sequence {b_n}$ be sequences in $\R$. {{TFAE|def = Asymptotically Equal Sequences}}
=== $(1)$ iff $(2)$ === {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \lim_{n \mathop \to \infty} \dfrac {a_n} {b_n} | o = \to | r = 1 }} {{eqn | ll = \leadstoandfrom | l = \lim_{n \mathop \to \infty} \paren {\dfrac {a_n} {b_n} - \dfrac {b_n} {b_n} } | o = \to | r = 0 }} {{eqn | ll = \leadstoandfrom | l...
Let $\sequence {a_n}$ and $\sequence {b_n}$ be [[Definition:Sequence|sequences in $\R$]]. {{TFAE|def = Asymptotically Equal Sequences}}
=== $(1)$ iff $(2)$ === {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \lim_{n \mathop \to \infty} \dfrac {a_n} {b_n} | o = \to | r = 1 }} {{eqn | ll = \leadstoandfrom | l = \lim_{n \mathop \to \infty} \paren {\dfrac {a_n} {b_n} - \dfrac {b_n} {b_n} } | o = \to | r = 0 }} {{eqn | ll = \leadstoandfrom | ...
Equivalence of Definitions of Asymptotically Equal Sequences
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Asymptotically_Equal_Sequences
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Asymptotically_Equal_Sequences
[ "Asymptotic Equality" ]
[ "Definition:Sequence" ]
[]
proofwiki-13412
Largest Number not Expressible as Sum of Multiples of 23 and 28
The largest integer $n$ that cannot be expressed in the form: :$n = 23 x + 28 y$ for $x, y \in \Z_{>0}$ is $593$.
By Largest Number not Expressible as Sum of Multiples of Coprime Integers, the largest such number is: :$\paren {23 - 1} \times \paren {28 - 1} - 1 = 593$ {{ProofWanted|This is a specific "historical" example of a general result which I read in Polya and Szego some time back, which still needs to be added into {{ProofW...
The largest [[Definition:Positive Integer|integer]] $n$ that cannot be expressed in the form: :$n = 23 x + 28 y$ for $x, y \in \Z_{>0}$ is $593$.
By [[Largest Number not Expressible as Sum of Multiples of Coprime Integers]], the largest such number is: :$\paren {23 - 1} \times \paren {28 - 1} - 1 = 593$ {{ProofWanted|This is a specific "historical" example of a general result which I read in Polya and Szego some time back, which still needs to be added into {{P...
Largest Number not Expressible as Sum of Multiples of 23 and 28
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Largest_Number_not_Expressible_as_Sum_of_Multiples_of_23_and_28
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Largest_Number_not_Expressible_as_Sum_of_Multiples_of_23_and_28
[ "Integer Combinations" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Integer" ]
[ "Largest Number not Expressible as Sum of Multiples of Coprime Integers" ]
proofwiki-13413
Open implies There Exists Way Below Element
Let $L = \struct {S, \preceq, \tau}$ be a continuous topological lattice with Scott topology. Let $p \in S, A \subseteq S$ such that: :$A$ is open and $p \in A$. Then: :$\exists q \in A: q \ll p$ where $q \ll p$ denotes $q$ is way below $p$.
By definition of continuous ordered set: :$p^\ll$ is directed and :$L$ satisfies the axiom of approximation. By the axiom of approximation: :$p = \map \sup {p^\ll}$ By definition of Scott topology: :$A$ is inaccessible by directed suprema. By definition of inaccessible by directed suprema: :$A \cap p^\ll \ne \O$ By def...
Let $L = \struct {S, \preceq, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Continuous Ordered Set|continuous]] [[Definition:Topological Lattice|topological lattice]] with [[Definition:Scott Topology|Scott topology]]. Let $p \in S, A \subseteq S$ such that: :$A$ is [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open]] and $p \in A$. Then: :$\exists q...
By definition of [[Definition:Continuous Ordered Set|continuous ordered set]]: :$p^\ll$ is [[Definition:Directed Subset|directed]] and :$L$ satisfies the [[Axiom:Axiom of Approximation|axiom of approximation]]. By the [[Axiom:Axiom of Approximation|axiom of approximation]]: :$p = \map \sup {p^\ll}$ By definition of [...
Open implies There Exists Way Below Element
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Open_implies_There_Exists_Way_Below_Element
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Open_implies_There_Exists_Way_Below_Element
[ "Topological Order Theory", "Way Below Relation", "Continuous Lattices", "Scott Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Continuous Ordered Set", "Definition:Topological Lattice", "Definition:Scott Topology", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Element is Way Below" ]
[ "Definition:Continuous Ordered Set", "Definition:Directed Subset", "Axiom:Axiom of Approximation", "Axiom:Axiom of Approximation", "Definition:Scott Topology", "Definition:Inaccessible by Directed Suprema", "Definition:Inaccessible by Directed Suprema", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Set In...
proofwiki-13414
Smallest Fourth Power which is Sum of 5 Fourth Powers
$625$ is the smallest fourth power which is the sum of $5$ fourth powers: :$625 = 5^4 = 2^4 + 2^4 + 3^4 + 4^4 + 4^4$
We check that for $n = 2, 3, 4$, $n^4$ is not a sum of $5$ smaller fourth powers. We have: :$5 \times 1^4 = 5 < 16 = 2^4$ :$5 \times 2^4 = 80 < 81 = 3^4$ so $2^4, 3^4$ are not sums of $5$ fourth powers. For $n = 4$: :$\dfrac {4^4} {3^4} < 4$ so such a sum can include at most $3$ $3^4$'s. However: :$3 \times 3^4 + 2^4 ...
$625$ is the smallest [[Definition:Fourth Power|fourth power]] which is the [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of $5$ [[Definition:Fourth Power|fourth powers]]: :$625 = 5^4 = 2^4 + 2^4 + 3^4 + 4^4 + 4^4$
We check that for $n = 2, 3, 4$, $n^4$ is not a [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of $5$ smaller [[Definition:Fourth Power|fourth powers]]. We have: :$5 \times 1^4 = 5 < 16 = 2^4$ :$5 \times 2^4 = 80 < 81 = 3^4$ so $2^4, 3^4$ are not [[Definition:Integer Addition|sums]] of $5$ [[Definition:Fourth Power|fourth power...
Smallest Fourth Power which is Sum of 5 Fourth Powers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smallest_Fourth_Power_which_is_Sum_of_5_Fourth_Powers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smallest_Fourth_Power_which_is_Sum_of_5_Fourth_Powers
[ "Fourth Powers", "625" ]
[ "Definition:Fourth Power", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Fourth Power" ]
[ "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Fourth Power", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Fourth Power", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Fourth Power", "Definition:Fourth Power", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Fourth Power" ]
proofwiki-13415
Interior is Union of Way Above Closures
Let $\left({S, \preceq, \tau}\right)$ be a complete continuous topological lattice with Scott topology. Let $X \subseteq S$. Then $X^\circ = \bigcup \left\{ {x^\gg: x \in S \land x^\gg \subseteq X}\right\}$ where :$X^\circ$ denotes the interior of $X$, :$x^\gg$ denotes the way above closure of $x$.
We have: :$\left\{ {G \in \left\{ {g^\gg: g \in S}\right\}: G \subseteq X}\right\} = \left\{ {x^\gg: x \in S \land x^\gg \subseteq X}\right\}$ By Way Above Closures Form Basis: :$\left\{ {x^\gg: x \in S}\right\}$ is basis of $\left({S, \tau}\right)$. By Interior is Union of Elements of Basis: :$X^\circ = \bigcup \left\...
Let $\left({S, \preceq, \tau}\right)$ be a [[Definition:Complete Lattice|complete]] [[Definition:Continuous Ordered Set|continuous]] [[Definition:Topological Lattice|topological lattice]] with [[Definition:Scott Topology|Scott topology]]. Let $X \subseteq S$. Then $X^\circ = \bigcup \left\{ {x^\gg: x \in S \land x^\...
We have: :$\left\{ {G \in \left\{ {g^\gg: g \in S}\right\}: G \subseteq X}\right\} = \left\{ {x^\gg: x \in S \land x^\gg \subseteq X}\right\}$ By [[Way Above Closures Form Basis]]: :$\left\{ {x^\gg: x \in S}\right\}$ is [[Definition:Analytic Basis|basis]] of $\left({S, \tau}\right)$. By [[Interior is Union of Element...
Interior is Union of Way Above Closures
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Interior_is_Union_of_Way_Above_Closures
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Interior_is_Union_of_Way_Above_Closures
[ "Topological Order Theory", "Continuous Lattices" ]
[ "Definition:Complete Lattice", "Definition:Continuous Ordered Set", "Definition:Topological Lattice", "Definition:Scott Topology", "Definition:Interior (Topology)", "Definition:Way Above Closure" ]
[ "Way Above Closures Form Basis", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis", "Interior is Union of Elements of Basis" ]
proofwiki-13416
Way Above Closures Form Basis
Let $L = \struct {S, \preceq, \tau}$ be a complete continuous topological lattice with Scott topology. Then $\set {x^\gg: x \in S}$ is an (analytic) basis of $L$.
Define $B = \set {x^\gg: x \in S}$. Thus by Way Above Closure is Open: :$B \subseteq \tau$ We will prove that: :for all $x \in S$: there exists a local basis $Q$ of $x$: $Q \subseteq B$ Let $x \in S$. By Way Above Closures that Way Below Form Local Basis: :$Q := \set {g^\gg: g \in S \land g \ll x}$ is a local basis at ...
Let $L = \struct {S, \preceq, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Complete Lattice|complete]] [[Definition:Continuous Ordered Set|continuous]] [[Definition:Topological Lattice|topological lattice]] with [[Definition:Scott Topology|Scott topology]]. Then $\set {x^\gg: x \in S}$ is an [[Definition:Analytic Basis|(analytic) basis]...
Define $B = \set {x^\gg: x \in S}$. Thus by [[Way Above Closure is Open]]: :$B \subseteq \tau$ We will prove that: :for all $x \in S$: there exists a [[Definition:Local Basis|local basis]] $Q$ of $x$: $Q \subseteq B$ Let $x \in S$. By [[Way Above Closures that Way Below Form Local Basis]]: :$Q := \set {g^\gg: g \in...
Way Above Closures Form Basis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Way_Above_Closures_Form_Basis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Way_Above_Closures_Form_Basis
[ "Topological Order Theory", "Continuous Lattices" ]
[ "Definition:Complete Lattice", "Definition:Continuous Ordered Set", "Definition:Topological Lattice", "Definition:Scott Topology", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis" ]
[ "Way Above Closure is Open", "Definition:Local Basis", "Way Above Closures that Way Below Form Local Basis", "Definition:Local Basis", "Definition:Subset", "Characterization of Analytic Basis by Local Bases", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis" ]
proofwiki-13417
Numbers whose Product with Reverse are Equal
:$651 \times 156 = 372 \times 273$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 651 \times 156 | r = \paren {3 \times 7 \times 31} \times \paren {2^2 \times 3 \times 13} | c = }} {{eqn | r = 2^2 \times 3^2 \times 7 \times 13 \times 31 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \paren {2^2 \times 3 \times 31} \times \paren {3 \times 7 \times 13} | c = }} {{eqn | r = 3...
:$651 \times 156 = 372 \times 273$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 651 \times 156 | r = \paren {3 \times 7 \times 31} \times \paren {2^2 \times 3 \times 13} | c = }} {{eqn | r = 2^2 \times 3^2 \times 7 \times 13 \times 31 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \paren {2^2 \times 3 \times 31} \times \paren {3 \times 7 \times 13} | c = }} {{eqn | r = 3...
Numbers whose Product with Reverse are Equal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Numbers_whose_Product_with_Reverse_are_Equal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Numbers_whose_Product_with_Reverse_are_Equal
[ "Recreational Mathematics", "651", "156", "372", "273" ]
[]
[]
proofwiki-13418
Record Gaps between Twin Primes
The gaps between the following pairs of twin primes are larger than those for all smaller pairs: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \tuple {3, 5} | o = \to | r = \tuple {5, 7} | c = a gap of $0$ }} {{eqn | l = \tuple {5, 7} | o = \to | r = \tuple {11, 13} | c = a gap of $4$ }} {{eqn | l = \tu...
By cases and inspection.
The gaps between the following [[Definition:Ordered Pair|pairs]] of [[Definition:Twin Primes|twin primes]] are larger than those for all smaller [[Definition:Ordered Pair|pairs]]: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \tuple {3, 5} | o = \to | r = \tuple {5, 7} | c = a gap of $0$ }} {{eqn | l = \tuple {5, 7} ...
By cases and inspection.
Record Gaps between Twin Primes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Record_Gaps_between_Twin_Primes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Record_Gaps_between_Twin_Primes
[ "Twin Primes" ]
[ "Definition:Ordered Pair", "Definition:Twin Primes", "Definition:Ordered Pair" ]
[]
proofwiki-13419
Consecutive Sophie Germain Primes cannot be Pair of Twin Primes
Let $p$ and $p + 2$ be twin primes. Then unless $p = 3$ it is not possible for both $p$ and $p + 2$ to be Sophie Germain primes.
First it is noted that $3$ and $5$ twin primes which are both Sophie Germain. Prime numbers greater than $3$ are of the form $6 n - 1$ and $6 n + 1$. Thus a pair of twin primes is of the form $\left({6 n - 1, 6 n + 1}\right)$. The result follows from Sophie Germain Prime cannot be 6n+1. {{qed}} Category:Twin Primes Cat...
Let $p$ and $p + 2$ be [[Definition:Twin Primes|twin primes]]. Then unless $p = 3$ it is not possible for both $p$ and $p + 2$ to be [[Definition:Sophie Germain Prime|Sophie Germain primes]].
First it is noted that $3$ and $5$ [[Definition:Twin Primes|twin primes]] which are both [[Definition:Sophie Germain Prime|Sophie Germain]]. [[Definition:Prime Number|Prime numbers]] greater than $3$ are of the form $6 n - 1$ and $6 n + 1$. Thus a pair of [[Definition:Twin Primes|twin primes]] is of the form $\left(...
Consecutive Sophie Germain Primes cannot be Pair of Twin Primes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Consecutive_Sophie_Germain_Primes_cannot_be_Pair_of_Twin_Primes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Consecutive_Sophie_Germain_Primes_cannot_be_Pair_of_Twin_Primes
[ "Twin Primes", "Sophie Germain Primes" ]
[ "Definition:Twin Primes", "Definition:Sophie Germain Prime" ]
[ "Definition:Twin Primes", "Definition:Sophie Germain Prime", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Twin Primes", "Sophie Germain Prime cannot be 6n+1", "Category:Twin Primes", "Category:Sophie Germain Primes" ]
proofwiki-13420
Sophie Germain Prime cannot be 6n+1
Let $p$ be a Sophie Germain prime. Then $p$ cannot be of the form $6 n + 1$, where $n$ is a positive integer.
Let $p$ be a Sophie Germain prime. Then, by definition, $2 p + 1$ is prime. {{AimForCont}} $p = 6 n + 1$ for some $n \in \Z_{>0}$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 2 p + 1 | r = 2 \paren {6 n + 1} + 1 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 12 n + 3 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 3 \paren {4 n + 1} | c = }} {{end-eqn}} an...
Let $p$ be a [[Definition:Sophie Germain Prime|Sophie Germain prime]]. Then $p$ cannot be of the form $6 n + 1$, where $n$ is a [[Definition:Strictly Positive Integer|positive integer]].
Let $p$ be a [[Definition:Sophie Germain Prime|Sophie Germain prime]]. Then, by definition, $2 p + 1$ is [[Definition:Prime Number|prime]]. {{AimForCont}} $p = 6 n + 1$ for some $n \in \Z_{>0}$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 2 p + 1 | r = 2 \paren {6 n + 1} + 1 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 12 n + 3 | c...
Sophie Germain Prime cannot be 6n+1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sophie_Germain_Prime_cannot_be_6n+1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sophie_Germain_Prime_cannot_be_6n+1
[ "Sophie Germain Primes" ]
[ "Definition:Sophie Germain Prime", "Definition:Strictly Positive/Integer" ]
[ "Definition:Sophie Germain Prime", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Proof by Contradiction", "Category:Sophie Germain Primes" ]
proofwiki-13421
Way Above Closure is Open
Let $L = \struct {S, \preceq, \tau}$ be a complete continuous topological lattice with Scott topology. Let $x \in S$. Then $x^\gg$ is open where $x^\gg$ denotes the way above closure of $x$.
By Way Above Closure is Upper: :$x^\gg$ is upper. We will prove that :$x^\gg$ is inaccessible by directed suprema. Let $D$ be a directed subset of $S$ such that :$\sup D \in x^\gg$ By definition of way above closure: :$x \ll \sup D$ By Way Below iff Second Operand Preceding Supremum of Directed Set There Exists Element...
Let $L = \struct {S, \preceq, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Complete Lattice|complete]] [[Definition:Continuous Ordered Set|continuous]] [[Definition:Topological Lattice|topological lattice]] with [[Definition:Scott Topology|Scott topology]]. Let $x \in S$. Then $x^\gg$ is [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open]] where $...
By [[Way Above Closure is Upper]]: :$x^\gg$ is [[Definition:Upper Section|upper]]. We will prove that :$x^\gg$ is [[Definition:Inaccessible by Directed Suprema|inaccessible by directed suprema]]. Let $D$ be a [[Definition:Directed Subset|directed subset]] of $S$ such that :$\sup D \in x^\gg$ By definition of [[Defin...
Way Above Closure is Open
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Way_Above_Closure_is_Open
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Way_Above_Closure_is_Open
[ "Topological Order Theory", "Continuous Lattices" ]
[ "Definition:Complete Lattice", "Definition:Continuous Ordered Set", "Definition:Topological Lattice", "Definition:Scott Topology", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Way Above Closure" ]
[ "Way Above Closure is Upper", "Definition:Upper Section", "Definition:Inaccessible by Directed Suprema", "Definition:Directed Subset", "Definition:Way Above Closure", "Way Below iff Second Operand Preceding Supremum of Directed Set There Exists Element of Directed Set First Operand Way Below Element", "...
proofwiki-13422
Way Above Closure is Upper
Let $\struct {S, \preceq}$ be an ordered set. Let $x \in S$. Then $x^\gg$ is upper where $x^\gg$ denotes the way above closure of $x$.
Let $y \in x^\gg$, $z \in S$ such that :$y \preceq z$ By definition of way above closure: :$x \ll y$ By Preceding and Way Below implies Way Below: :$x \ll z$ Thus by definition of way above closure: :$z \in x^\gg$ {{qed}}
Let $\struct {S, \preceq}$ be an [[Definition:Ordered Set|ordered set]]. Let $x \in S$. Then $x^\gg$ is [[Definition:Upper Section|upper]] where $x^\gg$ denotes the [[Definition:Way Above Closure|way above closure]] of $x$.
Let $y \in x^\gg$, $z \in S$ such that :$y \preceq z$ By definition of [[Definition:Way Above Closure|way above closure]]: :$x \ll y$ By [[Preceding and Way Below implies Way Below]]: :$x \ll z$ Thus by definition of [[Definition:Way Above Closure|way above closure]]: :$z \in x^\gg$ {{qed}}
Way Above Closure is Upper
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Way_Above_Closure_is_Upper
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Way_Above_Closure_is_Upper
[ "Way Below Relation" ]
[ "Definition:Ordered Set", "Definition:Upper Section", "Definition:Way Above Closure" ]
[ "Definition:Way Above Closure", "Preceding and Way Below implies Way Below", "Definition:Way Above Closure" ]
proofwiki-13423
Way Above Closures that Way Below Form Local Basis
{{rename|more descriptive of what the statement of the theorem says}} Let $L = \struct {S, \preceq, \tau}$ be a complete continuous topological lattice with Scott topology. Let $p \in S$. Then $\set {q^\gg: q \in S \land q \ll p}$ is a local basis at $p$.
Define $B := \set {q^\gg: q \in S \land q \ll p}$ By Way Above Closure is Open: :$B \subseteq \tau$ By definition of way above closure: :$\forall X \in B: p \in X$ Thus by definition: :$B$ is set of open neighborhoods. {{explain|open neighborhoods of what?}} Let $U$ be an open subset of $S$ such that :$p \in U$ By Open...
{{rename|more descriptive of what the statement of the theorem says}} Let $L = \struct {S, \preceq, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Complete Lattice|complete]] [[Definition:Continuous Ordered Set|continuous]] [[Definition:Topological Lattice|topological lattice]] with [[Definition:Scott Topology|Scott topology]]. Let $p \in...
Define $B := \set {q^\gg: q \in S \land q \ll p}$ By [[Way Above Closure is Open]]: :$B \subseteq \tau$ By definition of [[Definition:Way Above Closure|way above closure]]: :$\forall X \in B: p \in X$ Thus by definition: :$B$ is [[Definition:Set of Sets|set]] of [[Definition:Open Neighborhood|open neighborhoods]]. {...
Way Above Closures that Way Below Form Local Basis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Way_Above_Closures_that_Way_Below_Form_Local_Basis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Way_Above_Closures_that_Way_Below_Form_Local_Basis
[ "Topological Order Theory", "Way Below Relation", "Continuous Lattices" ]
[ "Definition:Complete Lattice", "Definition:Continuous Ordered Set", "Definition:Topological Lattice", "Definition:Scott Topology", "Definition:Local Basis" ]
[ "Way Above Closure is Open", "Definition:Way Above Closure", "Definition:Set of Sets", "Definition:Open Neighborhood", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Subset", "Open implies There Exists Way Below Element", "Definition:Scott Topology", "Definition:Upper Section", "Definition:Way Above ...
proofwiki-13424
Characterization of Analytic Basis by Local Bases
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $P$ be a set of subsets of $S$ such that :$P \subseteq \tau$ and :for all $p \in S$: there exists local basis $B$ at $p: B \subseteq P$ Then $P$ is basis of $T$.
By assumption: :$P \subseteq \tau$ Let $U$ be an open subset of $S$. Define: :$X := \set {V \in P: V \subseteq U}$ By definition of subset: :$X \subseteq P$ We will prove that: :$\forall u \in S: u \in U \iff \exists Z \in X: u \in Z$ Let $u \in S$. We will prove that: :$u \in U \implies \exists Z \in X: u \in Z$ Assum...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $P$ be a [[Definition:Set of Sets|set]] of [[Definition:Subset|subsets]] of $S$ such that :$P \subseteq \tau$ and :for all $p \in S$: there exists [[Definition:Local Basis|local basis]] $B$ at $p: B \subseteq P$ Then $P$ is [[De...
By assumption: :$P \subseteq \tau$ Let $U$ be an [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open]] [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $S$. Define: :$X := \set {V \in P: V \subseteq U}$ By definition of [[Definition:Subset|subset]]: :$X \subseteq P$ We will prove that: :$\forall u \in S: u \in U \iff \exists Z \in X: u \in Z$ L...
Characterization of Analytic Basis by Local Bases
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characterization_of_Analytic_Basis_by_Local_Bases
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characterization_of_Analytic_Basis_by_Local_Bases
[ "Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Set of Sets", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Local Basis", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis" ]
[ "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Local Basis", "Definition:Local Basis", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Local Basis", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Set Union/Set of Sets", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis" ]
proofwiki-13425
Value of Golden Ratio using 666
The Golden Ratio can be given by the following formula: :$\phi = -2 \sin 666 \degrees = 1.61803 \, 39887 \, 5 \ldots$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = -2 \sin 666 \degrees | r = -2 \sin 306 \degrees | c = Sine of Angle plus Full Angle }} {{eqn | r = 2 \sin 54 \degrees | c = Sine of Conjugate Angle }} {{eqn | r = 2 \cos 36 \degrees | c = Sine of Complement equals Cosine }} {{eqn | r = 2 \times \frac \phi 2 | c = ...
The [[Definition:Golden Ratio|Golden Ratio]] can be given by the following formula: :$\phi = -2 \sin 666 \degrees = 1.61803 \, 39887 \, 5 \ldots$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = -2 \sin 666 \degrees | r = -2 \sin 306 \degrees | c = [[Sine of Angle plus Full Angle]] }} {{eqn | r = 2 \sin 54 \degrees | c = [[Sine of Conjugate Angle]] }} {{eqn | r = 2 \cos 36 \degrees | c = [[Sine of Complement equals Cosine]] }} {{eqn | r = 2 \times \frac \phi 2 ...
Value of Golden Ratio using 666
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Value_of_Golden_Ratio_using_666
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Value_of_Golden_Ratio_using_666
[ "666", "Golden Mean" ]
[ "Definition:Golden Mean" ]
[ "Sine of Angle plus Full Angle", "Sine of Conjugate Angle", "Sine of Complement equals Cosine", "Cosine of 36 Degrees" ]
proofwiki-13426
Euler Phi Function of 666 equals Product of Digits
The number $666$ has the following interesting property: :$\map \phi {666} = 6 \times 6 \times 6$ where $\phi$ denotes the Euler $\phi$ function.
From Euler Phi Function of Integer: :$\ds \map \phi n = n \prod_{p \mathop \divides n} \paren {1 - \frac 1 p}$ where $p \divides n$ denotes the primes which divide $n$. We have that: :$666 = 2 \times 3^2 \times 37$ Thus: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \phi {666} | r = 666 \paren {1 - \dfrac 1 2} \paren {1 - \dfra...
The number $666$ has the following interesting property: :$\map \phi {666} = 6 \times 6 \times 6$ where $\phi$ denotes the [[Definition:Euler Phi Function|Euler $\phi$ function]].
From [[Euler Phi Function of Integer]]: :$\ds \map \phi n = n \prod_{p \mathop \divides n} \paren {1 - \frac 1 p}$ where $p \divides n$ denotes the [[Definition:Prime Number|primes]] which [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divide]] $n$. We have that: :$666 = 2 \times 3^2 \times 37$ Thus: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \ma...
Euler Phi Function of 666 equals Product of Digits
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Euler_Phi_Function_of_666_equals_Product_of_Digits
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Euler_Phi_Function_of_666_equals_Product_of_Digits
[ "Euler Phi Function", "666" ]
[ "Definition:Euler Phi Function" ]
[ "Euler Phi Function of Integer", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer" ]
proofwiki-13427
Pair of Consecutive Powerful Numbers whose First is Odd
The only known pair of consecutive integers which are both powerful numbers such that the first of the pair is odd is: :$\tuple {675, 676}$
By investigation: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 675 | r = 3^3 \times 5^2 }} {{eqn | l = 676 | r = 2^2 \times 13^2 }} {{end-eqn}} That there are no smaller ones can be determined again by investigation. {{qed}}
The only known [[Definition:Ordered Pair|pair]] of consecutive [[Definition:Integer|integers]] which are both [[Definition:Powerful Number|powerful numbers]] such that the first of the [[Definition:Ordered Pair|pair]] is [[Definition:Odd Integer|odd]] is: :$\tuple {675, 676}$
By investigation: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 675 | r = 3^3 \times 5^2 }} {{eqn | l = 676 | r = 2^2 \times 13^2 }} {{end-eqn}} That there are no smaller ones can be determined again by investigation. {{qed}}
Pair of Consecutive Powerful Numbers whose First is Odd
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Pair_of_Consecutive_Powerful_Numbers_whose_First_is_Odd
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Pair_of_Consecutive_Powerful_Numbers_whose_First_is_Odd
[ "Powerful Numbers", "675", "676" ]
[ "Definition:Ordered Pair", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Powerful Number", "Definition:Ordered Pair", "Definition:Odd Integer" ]
[]
proofwiki-13428
Interior is Union of Elements of Basis
Let $T = \left({S, \tau}\right)$ be a topological space. Let $B$ be a basis of $T$. Let $V$ be a subset of $S$. Then $V^\circ = \bigcup \left\{ {G \in B: G \subseteq V}\right\}$ where $V^\circ$ denotes the interior of $V$.
By definition of interior: :$\left\{ {G \in B: G \subseteq V}\right\} = \left\{ {G \in B: G \subseteq V^\circ}\right\}$ and :$V^\circ$ is open. Thus by Open Set is Union of Elements of Basis: :$V^\circ = \bigcup \left\{ {G \in B: G \subseteq V}\right\}$ {{qed}}
Let $T = \left({S, \tau}\right)$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $B$ be a [[Definition:Analytic Basis|basis]] of $T$. Let $V$ be a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $S$. Then $V^\circ = \bigcup \left\{ {G \in B: G \subseteq V}\right\}$ where $V^\circ$ denotes the [[Definition:Interior (T...
By definition of [[Definition:Interior (Topology)|interior]]: :$\left\{ {G \in B: G \subseteq V}\right\} = \left\{ {G \in B: G \subseteq V^\circ}\right\}$ and :$V^\circ$ is [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open]]. Thus by [[Open Set is Union of Elements of Basis]]: :$V^\circ = \bigcup \left\{ {G \in B: G \subseteq V}\...
Interior is Union of Elements of Basis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Interior_is_Union_of_Elements_of_Basis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Interior_is_Union_of_Elements_of_Basis
[ "Topological Bases" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Interior (Topology)" ]
[ "Definition:Interior (Topology)", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Open Set is Union of Elements of Basis" ]
proofwiki-13429
Palindromic Squares with Non-Palindromic Roots
The sequence of palindromic squares with non-palindromic square roots begins: :$676, 69 \, 696, 94 \, 249, 698 \, 896, 5 \, 221 \, 225, 6 \, 948 \, 496, 522 \, 808 \, 225, \ldots$ This sequence is not explicitly given in {{OEISLink}}. The sequence of those corresponding non-palindromic square roots begins: :$26, 264, 3...
By investigating all square numbers which are palindromic. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 676 | r = 26^2 }} {{eqn | l = 69 \, 696 | r = 264^2 }} {{eqn | l = 94 \, 249 | r = 307^2 }} {{eqn | l = 698 \, 896 | r = 836^2 }} {{eqn | l = 5 \, 221 \, 225 | r = 2285^2 }} {{eqn | l = 6 \, 948 \, 496 ...
The [[Definition:Integer Sequence|sequence]] of [[Definition:Palindromic Number|palindromic]] [[Definition:Square Number|squares]] with non-[[Definition:Palindromic Number|palindromic]] [[Definition:Square Root|square roots]] begins: :$676, 69 \, 696, 94 \, 249, 698 \, 896, 5 \, 221 \, 225, 6 \, 948 \, 496, 522 \, 808 ...
By investigating all [[Definition:Square Number|square numbers]] which are [[Definition:Palindromic Number|palindromic]]. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 676 | r = 26^2 }} {{eqn | l = 69 \, 696 | r = 264^2 }} {{eqn | l = 94 \, 249 | r = 307^2 }} {{eqn | l = 698 \, 896 | r = 836^2 }} {{eqn | l = 5 \, ...
Palindromic Squares with Non-Palindromic Roots
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Palindromic_Squares_with_Non-Palindromic_Roots
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Palindromic_Squares_with_Non-Palindromic_Roots
[ "Square Numbers", "Palindromic Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Integer Sequence", "Definition:Palindromic Number", "Definition:Square Number", "Definition:Palindromic Number", "Definition:Square Root", "Definition:Integer Sequence", "Definition:Palindromic Number", "Definition:Square Root" ]
[ "Definition:Square Number", "Definition:Palindromic Number" ]
proofwiki-13430
Tetrahedral Numbers which are Sum of 2 Tetrahedral Numbers
The sequence of tetrahedral numbers which are the sum of two other tetrahedral numbers begins: :$20, 680, 29260, 34220, 70300, \dots$ {{OEIS|A034404}}
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = 20 | c = the $4$th tetrahedral number }} {{eqn | r = 10 | c = the $3$rd tetrahedral number }} {{eqn | o = | ro= + | r = 10 | c = the $3$rd tetrahedral number }} {{eqn | o = | r = 680 | c = the $15$th tetrahedral number }} {{eqn | r = 120 ...
The [[Definition:Integer Sequence|sequence]] of [[Definition:Tetrahedral Number|tetrahedral numbers]] which are the [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of two other [[Definition:Tetrahedral Number|tetrahedral numbers]] begins: :$20, 680, 29260, 34220, 70300, \dots$ {{OEIS|A034404}}
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = 20 | c = the $4$th [[Definition:Tetrahedral Number|tetrahedral number]] }} {{eqn | r = 10 | c = the $3$rd [[Definition:Tetrahedral Number|tetrahedral number]] }} {{eqn | o = | ro= + | r = 10 | c = the $3$rd [[Definition:Tetrahedral Number|tetrahedral n...
Tetrahedral Numbers which are Sum of 2 Tetrahedral Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Tetrahedral_Numbers_which_are_Sum_of_2_Tetrahedral_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Tetrahedral_Numbers_which_are_Sum_of_2_Tetrahedral_Numbers
[ "Tetrahedral Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Integer Sequence", "Definition:Tetrahedral Number", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Tetrahedral Number" ]
[ "Definition:Tetrahedral Number", "Definition:Tetrahedral Number", "Definition:Tetrahedral Number", "Definition:Tetrahedral Number", "Definition:Tetrahedral Number", "Definition:Tetrahedral Number", "Definition:Tetrahedral Number", "Definition:Tetrahedral Number", "Definition:Tetrahedral Number", "...
proofwiki-13431
Open Set is Union of Elements of Basis
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $B$ be a basis of $T$. Let $V$ be an open subset of $S$. Then $V = \bigcup \set {G \in B: G \subseteq V}$
Let $x$ be arbitrary. We will prove that: :$x \in V \implies \exists Y \in \set {G \in B: G \subseteq V}: x \in Y$ Assume that: :$x \in V$ By definition of basis: :$\exists F \subseteq B: V = \bigcup F$ By definition of union: :$\exists Y \in F: x \in Y$ By Set is Subset of Union/General Result: :$Y \subseteq V$ Thus b...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $B$ be a [[Definition:Analytic Basis|basis]] of $T$. Let $V$ be an [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open]] [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $S$. Then $V = \bigcup \set {G \in B: G \subseteq V}$
Let $x$ be arbitrary. We will prove that: :$x \in V \implies \exists Y \in \set {G \in B: G \subseteq V}: x \in Y$ Assume that: :$x \in V$ By definition of [[Definition:Analytic Basis|basis]]: :$\exists F \subseteq B: V = \bigcup F$ By definition of [[Definition:Union of Set of Sets|union]]: :$\exists Y \in F: x \i...
Open Set is Union of Elements of Basis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Open_Set_is_Union_of_Elements_of_Basis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Open_Set_is_Union_of_Elements_of_Basis
[ "Topological Bases" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Subset" ]
[ "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis", "Definition:Set Union/Set of Sets", "Set is Subset of Union/General Result", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Set Union/Set of Sets" ]
proofwiki-13432
Mapping at Element is Supremum of Compact Elements implies Mapping is Increasing
Let $\struct {S, \vee_1, \wedge_1, \preceq_1}$ be a lattice. Let $\struct {T, \vee_2, \wedge_2, \preceq_2}$ be a complete lattice. Let $f: S \to T$ be a mapping such that :$\forall x \in S: \map f x = \sup \leftset {\map f w : w \in S \land w \preceq_1 x \land w}$ is compact$\rightset{}$ Then $f$ is increasing.
Let $x, y \in S$ such that :$x \preceq_1 y$ By Compact Closure is Increasing: :$x^{\mathrm {compact} } \subseteq y^{\mathrm {compact} }$ By Image of Subset under Mapping is Subset of Image: :$f \sqbrk {x^{\mathrm {compact} } } \subseteq f \sqbrk {y^{\mathrm {compact} } }$ By assumption: :$\map f x = \sup \leftset {\map...
Let $\struct {S, \vee_1, \wedge_1, \preceq_1}$ be a [[Definition:Lattice (Order Theory)|lattice]]. Let $\struct {T, \vee_2, \wedge_2, \preceq_2}$ be a [[Definition:Complete Lattice|complete lattice]]. Let $f: S \to T$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]] such that :$\forall x \in S: \map f x = \sup \leftset {\map f w ...
Let $x, y \in S$ such that :$x \preceq_1 y$ By [[Compact Closure is Increasing]]: :$x^{\mathrm {compact} } \subseteq y^{\mathrm {compact} }$ By [[Image of Subset under Mapping is Subset of Image]]: :$f \sqbrk {x^{\mathrm {compact} } } \subseteq f \sqbrk {y^{\mathrm {compact} } }$ By assumption: :$\map f x = \sup \le...
Mapping at Element is Supremum of Compact Elements implies Mapping is Increasing
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Mapping_at_Element_is_Supremum_of_Compact_Elements_implies_Mapping_is_Increasing
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Mapping_at_Element_is_Supremum_of_Compact_Elements_implies_Mapping_is_Increasing
[ "Way Below Relation" ]
[ "Definition:Lattice (Order Theory)", "Definition:Complete Lattice", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Compact Element", "Definition:Increasing/Mapping" ]
[ "Compact Closure is Increasing", "Image of Subset under Mapping is Subset of Image", "Definition:Compact Element", "Definition:Compact Element", "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Subset", "Definition:Compact Closure", "Supremum of Subset", "Definition:Complete Lattice" ]
proofwiki-13433
Equivalence of Definitions of Compatible Atlases
Let $M$ be a topological space. Let $\mathscr F, \mathscr G$ be $d$-dimensional atlases of class $C^k$ on $M$. {{TFAE|def = Compatible Atlases}}
=== Definition $1$ implies Definition $2$ === Follows immediately from the definition of $C^k$-atlas. {{qed|lemma}}
Let $M$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $\mathscr F, \mathscr G$ be $d$-[[Definition:Dimension of Atlas|dimensional]] [[Definition:Atlas|atlases]] of [[Definition:Class of Atlas|class]] $C^k$ on $M$. {{TFAE|def = Compatible Atlases}}
=== Definition $1$ implies Definition $2$ === Follows immediately from the definition of $C^k$-[[Definition:Atlas|atlas]]. {{qed|lemma}}
Equivalence of Definitions of Compatible Atlases
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Compatible_Atlases
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Compatible_Atlases
[ "Compatible Atlases" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Atlas", "Definition:Atlas", "Definition:Atlas" ]
[ "Definition:Atlas", "Definition:Atlas", "Definition:Atlas", "Definition:Atlas" ]
proofwiki-13434
Atlas is Contained in Unique Maximal Atlas
Let $M$ be a topological space. Let $A$ be a $d$-dimensional atlas of class $C^k$. Then $A$ is contained in a unique maximal atlas of class $C^k$.
=== Existence ===
Let $M$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $A$ be a $d$-[[Definition:Dimension of Atlas|dimensional]] [[Definition:Atlas|atlas]] of [[Definition:Class of Atlas|class]] $C^k$. Then $A$ is contained in a [[Definition:Unique|unique]] [[Definition:Maximal Atlas|maximal atlas]] of class $C^k$.
=== Existence ===
Atlas is Contained in Unique Maximal Atlas
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Atlas_is_Contained_in_Unique_Maximal_Atlas
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Atlas_is_Contained_in_Unique_Maximal_Atlas
[ "Manifolds", "Atlases", "Maximal Atlases" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Atlas", "Definition:Atlas", "Definition:Atlas", "Definition:Unique", "Definition:Atlas/Maximal Atlas" ]
[]
proofwiki-13435
Locally Euclidean iff has C0-Atlas
Let $M$ be a topological space. {{TFAE}} :$(1): \quad$ $M$ is locally euclidean. :$(2): \quad$ There exists a $C^0$-atlas on $M$.
{{ProofWanted|use Transition Mapping between Charts is Homeomorphism}} Category:Atlases Category:Topological Spaces Category:Locally Euclidean Spaces m4xz9zlgb5n2ga8wq14uqorb3lyv3n4
Let $M$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. {{TFAE}} :$(1): \quad$ $M$ is [[Definition:Locally Euclidean Space|locally euclidean]]. :$(2): \quad$ There exists a [[Definition:Atlas|$C^0$-atlas]] on $M$.
{{ProofWanted|use [[Transition Mapping between Charts is Homeomorphism]]}} [[Category:Atlases]] [[Category:Topological Spaces]] [[Category:Locally Euclidean Spaces]] m4xz9zlgb5n2ga8wq14uqorb3lyv3n4
Locally Euclidean iff has C0-Atlas
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Locally_Euclidean_iff_has_C0-Atlas
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Locally_Euclidean_iff_has_C0-Atlas
[ "Atlases", "Topological Spaces", "Locally Euclidean Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Locally Euclidean Space", "Definition:Atlas" ]
[ "Transition Mapping between Charts is Homeomorphism", "Category:Atlases", "Category:Topological Spaces", "Category:Locally Euclidean Spaces" ]
proofwiki-13436
Differentiable Structure Contains Unique Maximal Atlas
Let $M$ be a topological space. Let $k$ and $d$ be natural numbers. Let $S$ be a $d$-dimensional differentiable structure of class $C^k$ on $M$. Then $S$ contains a unique maximal $C^k$-atlas.
{{ProofWanted}} Category:Topological Manifolds Category:Maximal Atlases alrzbmnkm9a5a5mei0vpkxszoneg71r
Let $M$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $k$ and $d$ be [[Definition:Natural Number|natural numbers]]. Let $S$ be a $d$-dimensional [[Definition:Differentiable Structure|differentiable structure]] of class $C^k$ on $M$. Then $S$ contains a [[Definition:Unique|unique]] [[Definition:Maxima...
{{ProofWanted}} [[Category:Topological Manifolds]] [[Category:Maximal Atlases]] alrzbmnkm9a5a5mei0vpkxszoneg71r
Differentiable Structure Contains Unique Maximal Atlas
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Differentiable_Structure_Contains_Unique_Maximal_Atlas
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Differentiable_Structure_Contains_Unique_Maximal_Atlas
[ "Topological Manifolds", "Maximal Atlases" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Differentiable Structure", "Definition:Unique", "Definition:Atlas/Maximal Atlas" ]
[ "Category:Topological Manifolds", "Category:Maximal Atlases" ]
proofwiki-13437
Consecutive Integers whose Product is Primorial
The following primorials can be expressed as the product of consecutive integers: :$2, 6, 30, 210, 510 \, 510$ {{OEIS|A161620}} No others are known. The corresponding indices of those primorials are: :$2, 3, 5, 7, 17$ {{OEIS|A215658}} The corresponding values of $n$ such that $p\# = \paren {n - 1} n$ are: :$2, 3, 6, 15...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 2 \# | r = 1 \times 2 }} {{eqn | r = 2 }} {{eqn | l = 3 \# | r = 2 \times 3 }} {{eqn | r = 6 }} {{eqn | l = 5 \# | r = 2 \times 3 \times 5 }} {{eqn | r = 5 \times \paren {2 \times 3} }} {{eqn | r = 5 \times 6 }} {{eqn | r = 30 }} {{eqn | l = 7 \# | r = 2 \times 3 \times...
The following [[Definition:Primorial|primorials]] can be expressed as the [[Definition:Integer Multiplication|product]] of consecutive [[Definition:Integer|integers]]: :$2, 6, 30, 210, 510 \, 510$ {{OEIS|A161620}} No others are known. The corresponding indices of those [[Definition:Primorial|primorials]] are: :$2, 3...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 2 \# | r = 1 \times 2 }} {{eqn | r = 2 }} {{eqn | l = 3 \# | r = 2 \times 3 }} {{eqn | r = 6 }} {{eqn | l = 5 \# | r = 2 \times 3 \times 5 }} {{eqn | r = 5 \times \paren {2 \times 3} }} {{eqn | r = 5 \times 6 }} {{eqn | r = 30 }} {{eqn | l = 7 \# | r = 2 \times 3 \times...
Consecutive Integers whose Product is Primorial
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Consecutive_Integers_whose_Product_is_Primorial
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Consecutive_Integers_whose_Product_is_Primorial
[ "Primorials", "Recreational Mathematics" ]
[ "Definition:Primorial", "Definition:Multiplication/Integers", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Primorial" ]
[]
proofwiki-13438
Implicit Function Theorem
{{:Implicit Function Theorem/Real Functions}}
==== Reduction to $\tuple {a, b} = \tuple {0, 0}$ ==== We may assume $\tuple {a, b} = \tuple {0, 0}$. {{explain|why}} Define: :$F: \Omega \to \R^k: \map F {x, y} = y - \map {D_2 \map f {a, b}^{-1} } {\map f {x, y} }$ By Linear Function is Continuous, $D_2 \map f {a, b}^{-1}$ is continuous on $\R^k$. Thus $F$ is continu...
{{:Implicit Function Theorem/Real Functions}}
==== Reduction to $\tuple {a, b} = \tuple {0, 0}$ ==== We may assume $\tuple {a, b} = \tuple {0, 0}$. {{explain|why}} Define: :$F: \Omega \to \R^k: \map F {x, y} = y - \map {D_2 \map f {a, b}^{-1} } {\map f {x, y} }$ By [[Linear Function is Continuous]], $D_2 \map f {a, b}^{-1}$ is [[Definition:Continuous Real Func...
Implicit Function Theorem/Real Functions/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Implicit_Function_Theorem
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Implicit_Function_Theorem/Real_Functions/Proof_1
[ "Implicit Function Theorem", "Implicit Functions" ]
[]
[ "Linear Function is Continuous", "Definition:Continuous Real Function", "Definition:Continuous Real Function", "Definition:Open Ball", "Mean Value Inequality", "Definition:Identity Mapping", "Definition:Continuous Mapping", "Definition:Uniform Contraction Mapping", "Definition:Open Ball", "Definit...
proofwiki-13439
Implicit Function Theorem/Real Functions
Let $n$ and $k$ be natural numbers. Let $\Omega \subset \R^n \times \R^k$ be open. Let $f: \Omega \to \R^k$ be continuous. Let the partial derivatives of $f$ with respect to $\R^k$ be continuous. Let $\tuple {a, b} \in \Omega$, with $a\in \R^n$ and $b\in \R^k$. Let $\map f {a, b} = 0$. For $\tuple {x_0, y_0} \in \Omega...
==== Reduction to $\tuple {a, b} = \tuple {0, 0}$ ==== We may assume $\tuple {a, b} = \tuple {0, 0}$. {{explain|why}} Define: :$F: \Omega \to \R^k: \map F {x, y} = y - \map {D_2 \map f {a, b}^{-1} } {\map f {x, y} }$ By Linear Function is Continuous, $D_2 \map f {a, b}^{-1}$ is continuous on $\R^k$. Thus $F$ is continu...
Let $n$ and $k$ be [[Definition:Natural Number|natural numbers]]. Let $\Omega \subset \R^n \times \R^k$ be [[Definition:Open Set|open]]. Let $f: \Omega \to \R^k$ be [[Definition:Continuous Function|continuous]]. Let the [[Definition:Partial Derivative|partial derivatives]] of $f$ with respect to $\R^k$ be [[Definiti...
==== Reduction to $\tuple {a, b} = \tuple {0, 0}$ ==== We may assume $\tuple {a, b} = \tuple {0, 0}$. {{explain|why}} Define: :$F: \Omega \to \R^k: \map F {x, y} = y - \map {D_2 \map f {a, b}^{-1} } {\map f {x, y} }$ By [[Linear Function is Continuous]], $D_2 \map f {a, b}^{-1}$ is [[Definition:Continuous Real Func...
Implicit Function Theorem/Real Functions/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Implicit_Function_Theorem/Real_Functions
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Implicit_Function_Theorem/Real_Functions/Proof_1
[ "Implicit Function Theorem" ]
[ "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Open Set", "Definition:Continuous Function", "Definition:Partial Derivative", "Definition:Continuous Function", "Definition:Total Derivative", "Definition:Linear Transformation", "Definition:Inverse Linear Transformation", "Definition:Neighborhood", "Defin...
[ "Linear Function is Continuous", "Definition:Continuous Real Function", "Definition:Continuous Real Function", "Definition:Open Ball", "Mean Value Inequality", "Definition:Identity Mapping", "Definition:Continuous Mapping", "Definition:Uniform Contraction Mapping", "Definition:Open Ball", "Definit...
proofwiki-13440
Uniform Contraction Mapping Theorem
Let $M$ and $N$ be metric spaces. Let $M$ be complete. Let $f : M \times N \to M$ be a continuous uniform contraction. Then for all $t \in N$ there exists a unique $\map g t \in M$ such that $\map f {\map g t, t} = \map g t$, and the mapping $g: N \to M$ is continuous.
For every $t\in N$, the mapping: :$f_t: M \to M : x \mapsto \map f {x, t}$ is a contraction. By the Banach Fixed-Point Theorem, there exists a unique $\map g t \in M$ such that $\map {f_t} {\map g t} = \map g t$. We show that $g$ is continuous. Let $K < 1$ be a uniform Lipschitz constant for $f$. Let $s, t \in N$. Then...
Let $M$ and $N$ be [[Definition:Metric Space|metric spaces]]. Let $M$ be [[Definition:Complete Metric Space|complete]]. Let $f : M \times N \to M$ be a [[Definition:Continuous Mapping|continuous]] [[Definition:Uniform Contraction Mapping|uniform contraction]]. Then for all $t \in N$ there exists a [[Definition:Uniq...
For every $t\in N$, the [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]: :$f_t: M \to M : x \mapsto \map f {x, t}$ is a [[Definition:Contraction Mapping (Metric Space)|contraction]]. By the [[Banach Fixed-Point Theorem]], there exists a [[Definition:unique|unique]] $\map g t \in M$ such that $\map {f_t} {\map g t} = \map g t$. We sho...
Uniform Contraction Mapping Theorem
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Uniform_Contraction_Mapping_Theorem
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Uniform_Contraction_Mapping_Theorem
[ "Fixed Point Theorems", "Implicit Functions", "Metric Spaces", "Named Theorems" ]
[ "Definition:Metric Space", "Definition:Complete Metric Space", "Definition:Continuous Mapping", "Definition:Uniform Contraction Mapping", "Definition:Unique", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Metric Space)" ]
[ "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Contraction Mapping (Metric Space)", "Banach Fixed-Point Theorem", "Definition:unique", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Metric Space)", "Definition:Uniform Lipschitz Constant", "Definition:Uniform Contraction Mapping", "Definition:Euclidean Metric" ]
proofwiki-13441
Mapping at Element is Supremum of Compact Elements implies Mapping at Element is Supremum that Way Below
Let $\struct{S, \vee_1, \wedge_1, \preceq_1}$ and $\struct{T, \vee_2, \wedge_2, \preceq_2}$ be complete lattices. Let $f: S \to T$ be a mapping such that :$\forall x \in S: \map f x = \sup \leftset {\map f w: w \in S \land w \preceq_1 x \land w}$ is compact$\rightset{}$ Then :$\forall x \in S: \map f x = \sup \set{ \ma...
Let $x \in S$. Define $X = \leftset {\map f w: w \in S \land w \preceq_1 x \land w}$ is compact$\rightset{}$ Define $Y = \set { \map f w: w \in S \land w \ll x}$ We will prove that :$X \subseteq Y$ Let $b \in X$. By definition of $X$: :$\exists w \in S: b = \map f w \land w \preceq_1 x \land w$ is compact. By definitio...
Let $\struct{S, \vee_1, \wedge_1, \preceq_1}$ and $\struct{T, \vee_2, \wedge_2, \preceq_2}$ be [[Definition:Complete Lattice|complete lattices]]. Let $f: S \to T$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]] such that :$\forall x \in S: \map f x = \sup \leftset {\map f w: w \in S \land w \preceq_1 x \land w}$ is [[Definition:C...
Let $x \in S$. Define $X = \leftset {\map f w: w \in S \land w \preceq_1 x \land w}$ is [[Definition:Compact Element|compact]]$\rightset{}$ Define $Y = \set { \map f w: w \in S \land w \ll x}$ We will prove that :$X \subseteq Y$ Let $b \in X$. By definition of $X$: :$\exists w \in S: b = \map f w \land w \preceq_1...
Mapping at Element is Supremum of Compact Elements implies Mapping at Element is Supremum that Way Below
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Mapping_at_Element_is_Supremum_of_Compact_Elements_implies_Mapping_at_Element_is_Supremum_that_Way_Below
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Mapping_at_Element_is_Supremum_of_Compact_Elements_implies_Mapping_at_Element_is_Supremum_that_Way_Below
[ "Way Below Relation" ]
[ "Definition:Complete Lattice", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Compact Element" ]
[ "Definition:Compact Element", "Definition:Compact Element", "Definition:Compact Element", "Preceding and Way Below implies Way Below", "Definition:Upper Bound of Set", "Way Below implies Preceding", "Mapping at Element is Supremum implies Mapping is Increasing", "Definition:Increasing/Mapping", "Def...
proofwiki-13442
Inverse Function Theorem for Real Functions
Let $n \ge 1$ and $k \ge 1$ be natural numbers. Let $\Omega \subset \R^n$ be open. Let $f: \Omega \to \R^n$ be a vector-valued function of class $C^k$. Let $a \in \Omega$. Let the differential $D \map f a$ of $f$ at $a$ be invertible. Then there exist open sets $U \subset \Omega$ and $V \subset \R^n$ such that: :$a \in...
{{ProofWanted}} Category:Implicit Functions sg5dapv9eegzltg41sxmzl005tuvoft
Let $n \ge 1$ and $k \ge 1$ be [[Definition:Natural Number|natural numbers]]. Let $\Omega \subset \R^n$ be [[Definition:Open Set of Real Euclidean Space|open]]. Let $f: \Omega \to \R^n$ be a [[Definition:Vector-Valued Function|vector-valued function]] of [[Definition:Differentiability Class|class]] $C^k$. Let $a \in...
{{ProofWanted}} [[Category:Implicit Functions]] sg5dapv9eegzltg41sxmzl005tuvoft
Inverse Function Theorem for Real Functions
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inverse_Function_Theorem_for_Real_Functions
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inverse_Function_Theorem_for_Real_Functions
[ "Implicit Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Open Set/Real Analysis/Real Euclidean Space", "Definition:Vector-Valued Function", "Definition:Differentiability Class", "Definition:Differential of Mapping/Vector-Valued Function", "Definition:Inverse Linear Operator", "Definition:Open Set/Real Analysis/Real Eu...
[ "Category:Implicit Functions" ]
proofwiki-13443
Sum of 714 and 715
The sum of $714$ and $715$ is a $4$-digit integer which has $6$ anagrams which are prime.
We have that: :$714 + 715 = 1429$ Hence we investigate its anagrams. We bother only to check those which do not end in either $2$ or $4$, as those are even. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1429 | o = | c = is prime }} {{eqn | l = 1249 | o = | c = is prime }} {{eqn | l = 4129 | o = | c =...
The [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of $714$ and $715$ is a [[Definition:Digit|$4$-digit]] [[Definition:Integer|integer]] which has $6$ [[Definition:Anagram|anagrams]] which are [[Definition:Prime Number|prime]].
We have that: :$714 + 715 = 1429$ Hence we investigate its [[Definition:Anagram|anagrams]]. We bother only to check those which do not end in either $2$ or $4$, as those are [[Definition:Even Integer|even]]. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1429 | o = | c = is [[Definition:Prime Number|prime]] }} {{eqn | l = 1...
Sum of 714 and 715
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_714_and_715
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_714_and_715
[ "Prime Numbers", "714", "715" ]
[ "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Anagram", "Definition:Prime Number" ]
[ "Definition:Anagram", "Definition:Even Integer", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "D...
proofwiki-13444
720 is Product of Consecutive Numbers in Two Ways
:$720 = 6 \times 5 \times 4 \times 3 \times 2 = 10 \times 9 \times 8$
Follows from Factorial as Product of Two Factorials: :$10! = 6! \times 7!$ and so: :$\dfrac {10!} {7!} = 10 \times 9 \times 8 = 6 \times 5 \times 4 \times 3 \times 2 \times 1$ Hence the result. {{qed}}
:$720 = 6 \times 5 \times 4 \times 3 \times 2 = 10 \times 9 \times 8$
Follows from [[Factorial as Product of Two Factorials]]: :$10! = 6! \times 7!$ and so: :$\dfrac {10!} {7!} = 10 \times 9 \times 8 = 6 \times 5 \times 4 \times 3 \times 2 \times 1$ Hence the result. {{qed}}
720 is Product of Consecutive Numbers in Two Ways
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/720_is_Product_of_Consecutive_Numbers_in_Two_Ways
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/720_is_Product_of_Consecutive_Numbers_in_Two_Ways
[ "Factorials", "720" ]
[]
[ "Factorial as Product of Two Factorials" ]
proofwiki-13445
Factorial which is Sum of Two Squares
The only factorial which can be expressed as the sum of two squares is: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 6! | r = 12^2 + 24^2 | c = }} {{end-eqn}}
We show that for $n \ge 7$, $n!$ cannot be expressed as the sum of two squares. By refining the result in Interval containing Prime Number of forms 4n - 1, 4n + 1, 6n - 1, 6n + 1, one can show that: :There exists a prime of the form $4 k + 3$ strictly between $m$ and $2 m$ whenever $m \ge 4$. Let $n \ge 7$. Then $\ceil...
The only [[Definition:Factorial|factorial]] which can be expressed as the [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of two [[Definition:Square Number|squares]] is: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 6! | r = 12^2 + 24^2 | c = }} {{end-eqn}}
We show that for $n \ge 7$, $n!$ cannot be expressed as the [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of two [[Definition:Square Number|squares]]. By refining the result in [[Interval containing Prime Number of forms 4n - 1, 4n + 1, 6n - 1, 6n + 1]], one can show that: :There exists a [[Definition:Prime Number|prime]] of t...
Factorial which is Sum of Two Squares
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Factorial_which_is_Sum_of_Two_Squares
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Factorial_which_is_Sum_of_Two_Squares
[ "Factorials", "Square Numbers", "720" ]
[ "Definition:Factorial", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Square Number" ]
[ "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Square Number", "Interval containing Prime Number of forms 4n - 1, 4n + 1, 6n - 1, 6n + 1", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Integer as Sum of Two Squares", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Square Number", "Definition:Prime...
proofwiki-13446
Multiplicity of 720 in 720 Factorial
The multiplicity of $720$ in $720!$ is $178$. That is: :$720^{178} \divides 720!$ but: :$720^{179} \nmid 720!$ where: :$720!$ denotes $720$ factorial :$\divides$ denotes divisibility :$\nmid$ denotes non-divisibility.
We have that: :$720 = 2^4 \times 3^2 \times 5$ It remains to inspect the divisibility of $2$, $3$ and $5$ in $720!$ Thus:
The [[Definition:Multiplicity of Prime Factor|multiplicity]] of $720$ in $720!$ is $178$. That is: :$720^{178} \divides 720!$ but: :$720^{179} \nmid 720!$ where: :$720!$ denotes [[Definition:Factorial|$720$ factorial]] :$\divides$ denotes [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divisibility]] :$\nmid$ denotes non-[[Definition...
We have that: :$720 = 2^4 \times 3^2 \times 5$ It remains to inspect the [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divisibility]] of $2$, $3$ and $5$ in $720!$ Thus:
Multiplicity of 720 in 720 Factorial
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Multiplicity_of_720_in_720_Factorial
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Multiplicity_of_720_in_720_Factorial
[ "Factorials", "720", "De Polignac's Formula" ]
[ "Definition:Prime Decomposition/Multiplicity", "Definition:Factorial", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer" ]
[ "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer" ]
proofwiki-13447
Continuous iff Mapping at Element is Supremum
Let $\left({S, \preceq_1, \tau_1}\right)$ and $\left({T, \preceq_2, \tau_2}\right)$ be complete continuous topological lattices with Scott topologies. Let $f: S \to T$ be a mapping. Then $f$ is continuous {{iff}} :$\forall x \in S: f\left({x}\right) = \sup \left\{ {f\left({w}\right): w \in S \land w \ll x}\right\}$
=== Sufficient Condition === Assume that :$f$ is continuous. By Continuous iff Directed Suprema Preserving: :$f$ is preserves directed suprema. Thus by Directed Suprema Preserving Mapping at Element is Supremum: :$\forall x \in S: f\left({x}\right) = \sup \left\{ {f\left({w}\right): w \in S \land w \ll x}\right\}$ {{qe...
Let $\left({S, \preceq_1, \tau_1}\right)$ and $\left({T, \preceq_2, \tau_2}\right)$ be [[Definition:Complete Lattice|complete]] [[Definition:Continuous Ordered Set|continuous]] [[Definition:Topological Lattice|topological lattices]] with [[Definition:Scott Topology|Scott topologies]]. Let $f: S \to T$ be a [[Definitio...
=== Sufficient Condition === Assume that :$f$ is [[Definition:Continuous (Topology)|continuous]]. By [[Continuous iff Directed Suprema Preserving]]: :$f$ is [[Definition:Mapping Preserves Supremum/Directed|preserves directed suprema]]. Thus by [[Directed Suprema Preserving Mapping at Element is Supremum]]: :$\forall...
Continuous iff Mapping at Element is Supremum
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_iff_Mapping_at_Element_is_Supremum
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_iff_Mapping_at_Element_is_Supremum
[ "Topological Order Theory", "Way Below Relation", "Continuous Lattices" ]
[ "Definition:Complete Lattice", "Definition:Continuous Ordered Set", "Definition:Topological Lattice", "Definition:Scott Topology", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)" ]
[ "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Continuous iff Directed Suprema Preserving", "Definition:Mapping Preserves Supremum/Directed", "Directed Suprema Preserving Mapping at Element is Supremum", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)" ]
proofwiki-13448
Equivalence of Definitions of Synthetic Basis
Let $S$ be a set. {{TFAE|def = Synthetic Basis}}
We note that $\paren {\text B 1}$ and $\paren {\text B 1'}$ are the same for both definition $1$ and definition $2$. It remains to demonstrate the equivalence of $\paren {\text B 2}$ and $\paren {\text B 2'}$.
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. {{TFAE|def = Synthetic Basis}}
We note that $\paren {\text B 1}$ and $\paren {\text B 1'}$ are the same for both [[Definition:Synthetic Basis/Definition 1|definition $1$]] and [[Definition:Synthetic Basis/Definition 2|definition $2$]]. It remains to demonstrate the [[Definition:Logical Equivalence|equivalence]] of $\paren {\text B 2}$ and $\paren {...
Equivalence of Definitions of Synthetic Basis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Synthetic_Basis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Synthetic_Basis
[ "Synthetic Bases" ]
[ "Definition:Set" ]
[ "Definition:Synthetic Basis/Definition 1", "Definition:Synthetic Basis/Definition 2", "Definition:Logical Equivalence", "Definition:Synthetic Basis/Definition 1", "Definition:Synthetic Basis/Definition 1", "Definition:Synthetic Basis/Definition 2", "Definition:Synthetic Basis/Definition 1" ]
proofwiki-13449
Equivalence of Definitions of Generated Submodule over Ring with Unity
Let $R$ be a ring with unity.. Let $\struct {M, +, \circ}_R$ be a unitary $R$-module. Let $S\subset M$ be a subset. {{TFAE|def = Generated Submodule}}
Let: :$\ds H_1 := \bigcap \set { M' \subseteq M : S \subseteq M', \textrm {$M'$ is a submodule of $M$} }$ be the intersection defined in first definition. From Intersection of Submodules is Submodule:General Result, it follows that $H_1$ is a submodule of $M$. Let: :$\ds H_2 := \set { \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n \lambda_i \...
Let $R$ be a [[Definition:Ring with Unity|ring with unity]].. Let $\struct {M, +, \circ}_R$ be a [[Definition:Unitary Module over Ring|unitary $R$-module]]. Let $S\subset M$ be a [[Definition:Subset|subset]]. {{TFAE|def = Generated Submodule}}
Let: :$\ds H_1 := \bigcap \set { M' \subseteq M : S \subseteq M', \textrm {$M'$ is a submodule of $M$} }$ be the [[Definition:Set Intersection|intersection]] defined in [[Definition:Generated Submodule/Definition 1|first definition]]. From [[Intersection of Submodules is Submodule/General Result|Intersection of Subm...
Equivalence of Definitions of Generated Submodule over Ring with Unity
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Generated_Submodule_over_Ring_with_Unity
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Generated_Submodule_over_Ring_with_Unity
[ "Generators of Modules" ]
[ "Definition:Ring with Unity", "Definition:Unitary Module over Ring", "Definition:Subset" ]
[ "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Generated Submodule/Definition 1", "Intersection of Submodules is Submodule/General Result", "Definition:Submodule", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Generated Submodule/Unitary", "Definition:Submodule", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Set", "Defi...
proofwiki-13450
Equivalence of Definitions of Basis of Vector Space
Let $K$ be a division ring. Let $\struct {G, +_G, \circ}_K$ be an vector space over $K$. {{TFAE| def = Basis of Vector Space}}
=== Definition 1 implies Definition 2 === Let $\BB$ be a linearly independent subset of $G$ which is a generator for $G$. Suppose $\BB \subseteq \BB'$ is a linearly independent subset of $G$. We aim to show that $\BB = \BB'$, proving maximality. Suppose that $\BB \ne \BB'$. Let $x \in \BB' \setminus \BB$. Since $G$ ...
Let $K$ be a [[Definition:Division Ring|division ring]]. Let $\struct {G, +_G, \circ}_K$ be an [[Definition:Vector Space|vector space]] over $K$. {{TFAE| def = Basis of Vector Space}}
=== Definition 1 implies Definition 2 === Let $\BB$ be a [[Definition:Linearly Independent Set|linearly independent subset]] of $G$ which is a [[Definition:Generator of Module|generator]] for $G$. Suppose $\BB \subseteq \BB'$ is a [[Definition:Linearly Independent Set|linearly independent subset]] of $G$. We aim to ...
Equivalence of Definitions of Basis of Vector Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Basis_of_Vector_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Basis_of_Vector_Space
[ "Bases of Vector Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Division Ring", "Definition:Vector Space" ]
[ "Definition:Linearly Independent/Set", "Definition:Generator of Module", "Definition:Linearly Independent/Set", "Definition:Maximal/Element", "Definition:Generator of Module", "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Linearly Dependent/Set", "Definition:Maximal/Element", "Definition:Linear...
proofwiki-13451
Equivalence of Definitions of Differentiable Real Function at Point
Let $\openint a b \subset \R$ be an open interval. Let $\xi$ be a point in $\openint a b$. {{TFAE|def = Differentiable Real Function at Point|view = differentiable real function at a point}}
{{ProofWanted|compare Equivalence of Definitions of Derivative}} Category:Differentiable Real Functions 34ueqe29g1aqkgizzbncuvs99ypu7tq
Let $\openint a b \subset \R$ be an [[Definition:Open Real Interval|open interval]]. Let $\xi$ be a point in $\openint a b$. {{TFAE|def = Differentiable Real Function at Point|view = differentiable real function at a point}}
{{ProofWanted|compare [[Equivalence of Definitions of Derivative]]}} [[Category:Differentiable Real Functions]] 34ueqe29g1aqkgizzbncuvs99ypu7tq
Equivalence of Definitions of Differentiable Real Function at Point
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Differentiable_Real_Function_at_Point
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Differentiable_Real_Function_at_Point
[ "Differentiable Real Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Real Interval/Open" ]
[ "Equivalence of Definitions of Derivative", "Category:Differentiable Real Functions" ]
proofwiki-13452
Continuous iff Mapping at Element is Supremum of Compact Elements
Let $L = \struct {S, \preceq_1, \tau_1}$ and $R = \struct {T, \preceq_2, \tau_2}$ be complete algebraic topological lattices with Scott topologies. Let $f: S \to T$ be a mapping. Then $f$ is continuous {{iff}}: :$\forall x \in S: \map f x = \sup \leftset {\map f w: w \in S \land w \preceq_1 x \land w}$ is compact$\righ...
By Algebraic iff Continuous and For Every Way Below Exists Compact Between: :$L$ and $R$ are continuous.
Let $L = \struct {S, \preceq_1, \tau_1}$ and $R = \struct {T, \preceq_2, \tau_2}$ be [[Definition:Complete Lattice|complete]] [[Definition:Algebraic Ordered Set|algebraic]] [[Definition:Topological Lattice|topological lattices]] with [[Definition:Scott Topology|Scott topologies]]. Let $f: S \to T$ be a [[Definition:Ma...
By [[Algebraic iff Continuous and For Every Way Below Exists Compact Between]]: :$L$ and $R$ are [[Definition:Continuous Ordered Set|continuous]].
Continuous iff Mapping at Element is Supremum of Compact Elements
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_iff_Mapping_at_Element_is_Supremum_of_Compact_Elements
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_iff_Mapping_at_Element_is_Supremum_of_Compact_Elements
[ "Topological Order Theory", "Way Below Relation", "Continuous Lattices" ]
[ "Definition:Complete Lattice", "Definition:Algebraic Ordered Set", "Definition:Topological Lattice", "Definition:Scott Topology", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Compact Element" ]
[ "Algebraic iff Continuous and For Every Way Below Exists Compact Between", "Definition:Continuous Ordered Set" ]
proofwiki-13453
Solutions to Approximate Fermat Equation x^3 = y^3 + z^3 Plus or Minus 1
The approximate Fermat equation: :$x^3 = y^3 + z^3 \pm 1$ has the solutions: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 9^3 | r = 6^3 + 8^3 + 1 }} {{eqn | l = 103^3 | r = 64^3 + 94^3 - 1 | c = }} {{end-eqn}}
Performing the arithmetic: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 6^3 + 8^3 + 1 | r = 216 + 512 + 1 }} {{eqn | r = 729 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 9^3 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 64^3 + 94^3 - 1 | r = 262 \, 144 + 830 \, 584 - 1 }} {{eqn | r = 1 \, 092 \, 727 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 103^3 ...
The [[Definition:Approximate Fermat Equation|approximate Fermat equation]]: :$x^3 = y^3 + z^3 \pm 1$ has the solutions: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 9^3 | r = 6^3 + 8^3 + 1 }} {{eqn | l = 103^3 | r = 64^3 + 94^3 - 1 | c = }} {{end-eqn}}
Performing the arithmetic: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 6^3 + 8^3 + 1 | r = 216 + 512 + 1 }} {{eqn | r = 729 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 9^3 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 64^3 + 94^3 - 1 | r = 262 \, 144 + 830 \, 584 - 1 }} {{eqn | r = 1 \, 092 \, 727 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 103^...
Solutions to Approximate Fermat Equation x^3 = y^3 + z^3 Plus or Minus 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Solutions_to_Approximate_Fermat_Equation_x^3_=_y^3_+_z^3_Plus_or_Minus_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Solutions_to_Approximate_Fermat_Equation_x^3_=_y^3_+_z^3_Plus_or_Minus_1
[ "Approximate Fermat Equations" ]
[ "Definition:Approximate Fermat Equation" ]
[]
proofwiki-13454
Cubes which are Sum of Five Cubes
The following cube numbers can be expressed as the sum of $5$ positive cube numbers: :$9^3, \ldots$ {{expand|More terms needed. It seems that: </br> $4$ and all numbers $> 8$ can be so expressed </br> only $4, 8, 10, 11, 13$ require repeated cubes}}
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 9^3 | r = 729 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 1 + 27 + 64 + 125 + 512 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 1^3 + 3^3 + 4^3 + 5^3 + 8^3 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{expand|Add the proof based on $9^3 {{=}} 1^3 + 6^3 + 8^3$ and $6^3 {{=}} 3^3 + 4^3 + 5^3$ from Cubes which are Sum of Three Cubes}}
The following [[Definition:Cube Number|cube numbers]] can be expressed as the [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of $5$ [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive]] [[Definition:Cube Number|cube numbers]]: :$9^3, \ldots$ {{expand|More terms needed. It seems that: </br> $4$ and all numbers $> 8$ can be so expressed </br> ...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 9^3 | r = 729 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 1 + 27 + 64 + 125 + 512 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 1^3 + 3^3 + 4^3 + 5^3 + 8^3 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{expand|Add the proof based on $9^3 {{=}} 1^3 + 6^3 + 8^3$ and $6^3 {{=}} 3^3 + 4^3 + 5^3$ from [[Cubes which are Sum of Three Cubes]]}}
Cubes which are Sum of Five Cubes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cubes_which_are_Sum_of_Five_Cubes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cubes_which_are_Sum_of_Five_Cubes
[ "Sums of Cubes" ]
[ "Definition:Cube Number", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Cube Number" ]
[ "Cubes which are Sum of Three Cubes" ]
proofwiki-13455
Period of Reciprocal of 729 is 81
The decimal expansion of the reciprocal of $729$ has $\dfrac 1 9$ the maximum period, that is, $81$: :$\dfrac 1 {729} = 0 \cdotp \dot 00137 \, 17421 \, 12482 \, 85322 \, 35939 \, 64334 \, 70507 \, 54458 \, 16186 \, 55692 \, 72976 \, 68038 \, 40877 \, 91495 \, 19890 \, 26063 \, \dot 1$ The recurring part can be arranged...
Performing the calculation using long division: <pre> 0.00137174211248285322359396433470507544581618655692729766803840877914951989026063100 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 729)1.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000...
The [[Definition:Decimal Expansion|decimal expansion]] of the [[Definition:Reciprocal|reciprocal]] of $729$ has $\dfrac 1 9$ the maximum [[Definition:Period of Recurrence|period]], that is, $81$: :$\dfrac 1 {729} = 0 \cdotp \dot 00137 \, 17421 \, 12482 \, 85322 \, 35939 \, 64334 \, 70507 \, 54458 \, 16186 \, 55692 \, ...
Performing the calculation using [[Definition:Long Division|long division]]: <pre> 0.00137174211248285322359396433470507544581618655692729766803840877914951989026063100 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 729)1.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000...
Period of Reciprocal of 729 is 81
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Period_of_Reciprocal_of_729_is_81
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Period_of_Reciprocal_of_729_is_81
[ "729", "Examples of Reciprocals" ]
[ "Definition:Decimal Expansion", "Definition:Reciprocal", "Definition:Basis Expansion/Recurrence/Period", "Definition:Basis Expansion/Recurrence" ]
[ "Definition:Classical Algorithm/Division" ]
proofwiki-13456
Implicit Function Theorem for Differentiable Real Functions
Let $\Omega \subset \R^{n+k}$ be open. Let $f : \Omega \to \R^k$ be differentiable. Let the $i$th partial derivatives of $f$ be continuous in $\Omega$ for $n+1 \leq i \leq n+k$. Let $(a,b) \in \Omega$, with $a\in \R^n$ and $b\in \R^k$. Let $f(a,b) = 0$. For $(x_0,y_0)\in\Omega$, let $D_2 f(x_0,y_0)$ denote the differen...
{{ProofWanted}} Category:Implicit Functions 4t3eiy6pzrf811n7rr0487hxp0tgrea
Let $\Omega \subset \R^{n+k}$ be [[Definition:Open Set of Real Euclidean Space|open]]. Let $f : \Omega \to \R^k$ be [[Definition:Differentiable Vector-Valued Function|differentiable]]. Let the $i$th [[Definition:Partial Derivative of Real-Valued Function|partial derivatives]] of $f$ be [[Definition:Continuous Functio...
{{ProofWanted}} [[Category:Implicit Functions]] 4t3eiy6pzrf811n7rr0487hxp0tgrea
Implicit Function Theorem for Differentiable Real Functions
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Implicit_Function_Theorem_for_Differentiable_Real_Functions
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Implicit_Function_Theorem_for_Differentiable_Real_Functions
[ "Implicit Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Open Set/Real Analysis/Real Euclidean Space", "Definition:Differentiable Mapping/Vector-Valued Function", "Definition:Partial Derivative/Real Analysis", "Definition:Continuous Function", "Definition:Differential of Mapping/Vector-Valued Function", "Definition:Linear Transformation", "Definit...
[ "Category:Implicit Functions" ]
proofwiki-13457
Implicit Function Theorem for Smooth Real Functions
Let $\Omega \subset \R^{n+k}$ be open. Let $f : \Omega \to \R^k$ be smooth. Let $(a,b) \in \Omega$, with $a\in \R^n$ and $b\in \R^k$. Let $f(a,b) = 0$. For $(x_0,y_0)\in\Omega$, let $D_2 f(x_0,y_0)$ denote the differential of the function $y\mapsto f(x_0, y)$ at $y_0$. Let the linear map $D_2 f(a,b)$ be invertible. The...
{{ProofWanted}} Category:Implicit Functions op8r7n6voyto8kaqajoonhlny7b7fra
Let $\Omega \subset \R^{n+k}$ be [[Definition:Open Set of Real Euclidean Space|open]]. Let $f : \Omega \to \R^k$ be [[Definition:Smooth Vector-Valued Function|smooth]]. Let $(a,b) \in \Omega$, with $a\in \R^n$ and $b\in \R^k$. Let $f(a,b) = 0$. For $(x_0,y_0)\in\Omega$, let $D_2 f(x_0,y_0)$ denote the [[Definition:...
{{ProofWanted}} [[Category:Implicit Functions]] op8r7n6voyto8kaqajoonhlny7b7fra
Implicit Function Theorem for Smooth Real Functions
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Implicit_Function_Theorem_for_Smooth_Real_Functions
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Implicit_Function_Theorem_for_Smooth_Real_Functions
[ "Implicit Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Open Set/Real Analysis/Real Euclidean Space", "Definition:Smooth Vector-Valued Function", "Definition:Differential of Mapping/Vector-Valued Function", "Definition:Linear Transformation", "Definition:Invertible Linear Mapping", "Definition:Neighborhood", "Definition:Function", "Definition:S...
[ "Category:Implicit Functions" ]
proofwiki-13458
Sum of 4 Consecutive Binomial Coefficients forming Square
Consider the Diophantine equation: :$\dbinom n 0 + \dbinom n 1 + \dbinom n 2 + \dbinom n 3 = m^2$ where: :$\dbinom a b$ denotes a binomial coefficient :$n$ is an integer :$m$ is a non-negative integer. Then $n$ has one of the following values: :$-1, 0, 2, 7, 15, 74, 767$ {{OEIS|A047694}} The corresponding values of $m$...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | r = \dbinom {-1} 0 + \dbinom {-1} 1 + \dbinom {-1} 2 + \dbinom {-1} 3 | o = | c = }} {{eqn | r = \left({-1}\right)^0 \dbinom 0 0 + \left({-1}\right)^1 \dbinom 1 1 + \left({-1}\right)^2 \dbinom 2 2 + \left({-1}\right)^3 \dbinom 3 3 | c = Negated Upper Index of Binomial Coefficie...
Consider the [[Definition:Diophantine Equation|Diophantine equation]]: :$\dbinom n 0 + \dbinom n 1 + \dbinom n 2 + \dbinom n 3 = m^2$ where: :$\dbinom a b$ denotes a [[Definition:Binomial Coefficient|binomial coefficient]] :$n$ is an [[Definition:Integer|integer]] :$m$ is a [[Definition:Positive Integer|non-negative in...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | r = \dbinom {-1} 0 + \dbinom {-1} 1 + \dbinom {-1} 2 + \dbinom {-1} 3 | o = | c = }} {{eqn | r = \left({-1}\right)^0 \dbinom 0 0 + \left({-1}\right)^1 \dbinom 1 1 + \left({-1}\right)^2 \dbinom 2 2 + \left({-1}\right)^3 \dbinom 3 3 | c = [[Negated Upper Index of Binomial Coeffic...
Sum of 4 Consecutive Binomial Coefficients forming Square
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_4_Consecutive_Binomial_Coefficients_forming_Square
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_4_Consecutive_Binomial_Coefficients_forming_Square
[ "Binomial Coefficients", "Square Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Diophantine Equation", "Definition:Binomial Coefficient", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Positive/Integer" ]
[ "Negated Upper Index of Binomial Coefficient/Corollary 1", "Binomial Coefficient with Self", "Binomial Coefficient with Zero", "Binomial Coefficient with Zero", "Binomial Coefficient with One", "Binomial Coefficient with Self" ]
proofwiki-13459
Implicit Function Theorem for Lipschitz Contractions
Let $M$ and $N$ be metric spaces. Let $M$ be complete. Let $f : M \times N \to M$ be a Lipschitz continuous uniform contraction. Then for all $t\in N$ there exists a unique $\map g t \in M$ such that $\map f {\map g t, t} = \map g t$, and the mapping $g : N \to M$ is Lipschitz continuous.
For every $t\in N$, the mapping: :$f_t : M \to M : x \mapsto \map f {x, t}$ is a contraction mapping. By the Banach Fixed-Point Theorem, there exists a unique $\map g t \in M$ such that $\map {f_t} {\map g t} = \map g t$. We show that $g$ is Lipschitz continuous. Let $K<1$ be a uniform Lipschitz constant for $f$. Let $...
Let $M$ and $N$ be [[Definition:Metric Space|metric spaces]]. Let $M$ be [[Definition:Complete Metric Space|complete]]. Let $f : M \times N \to M$ be a [[Definition:Lipschitz Continuous|Lipschitz continuous]] [[Definition:Uniform Contraction Mapping|uniform contraction]]. Then for all $t\in N$ there exists a [[Defi...
For every $t\in N$, the [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]: :$f_t : M \to M : x \mapsto \map f {x, t}$ is a [[Definition:Contraction Mapping (Metric Space)|contraction mapping]]. By the [[Banach Fixed-Point Theorem]], there exists a [[Definition:unique|unique]] $\map g t \in M$ such that $\map {f_t} {\map g t} = \map g t$...
Implicit Function Theorem for Lipschitz Contractions
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Implicit_Function_Theorem_for_Lipschitz_Contractions
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Implicit_Function_Theorem_for_Lipschitz_Contractions
[ "Implicit Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Metric Space", "Definition:Complete Metric Space", "Definition:Lipschitz Continuity", "Definition:Uniform Contraction Mapping", "Definition:Unique", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Lipschitz Continuity" ]
[ "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Contraction Mapping (Metric Space)", "Banach Fixed-Point Theorem", "Definition:unique", "Definition:Lipschitz Continuity", "Definition:Uniform Lipschitz Constant", "Definition:Lipschitz Continuity/Lipschitz Constant", "Definition:Uniform Contraction Mapping", "Defin...
proofwiki-13460
Implicit Function Theorem for Lipschitz Contraction at Point
Let $M$ and $N$ be metric spaces. Let $M$ be complete. Let $f: M \times N \to M$ be a uniform contraction. Then for all $t \in N$ there exists a unique $\map g t \in M$ such that $\map f {\map g t, t} = \map g t$, and if $f$ is Lipschitz continuous at a point $\tuple {\map g t, t}$, then $g$ is Lipschitz continuous at ...
For every $t \in N$, the mapping: :$f_t : M \to M : x \mapsto \map f {x, t}$ is a contraction mapping. {{explain|Source for above statement? What exactly does $f_t$ mean here?}} By the Banach Fixed-Point Theorem, there exists a unique $\map g t \in M$ such that $\map {f_t} {\map g t} = \map g t$. Let $f$ be Lipschitz c...
Let $M$ and $N$ be [[Definition:Metric Space|metric spaces]]. Let $M$ be [[Definition:Complete Metric Space|complete]]. Let $f: M \times N \to M$ be a [[Definition:Uniform Contraction Mapping|uniform contraction]]. Then for all $t \in N$ there exists a [[Definition:Unique|unique]] $\map g t \in M$ such that $\map f...
For every $t \in N$, the [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]: :$f_t : M \to M : x \mapsto \map f {x, t}$ is a [[Definition:Contraction Mapping (Metric Space)|contraction mapping]]. {{explain|Source for above statement? What exactly does $f_t$ mean here?}} By the [[Banach Fixed-Point Theorem]], there exists a [[Definition:...
Implicit Function Theorem for Lipschitz Contraction at Point
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Implicit_Function_Theorem_for_Lipschitz_Contraction_at_Point
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Implicit_Function_Theorem_for_Lipschitz_Contraction_at_Point
[ "Implicit Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Metric Space", "Definition:Complete Metric Space", "Definition:Uniform Contraction Mapping", "Definition:Unique", "Definition:Lipschitz Continuity/Point", "Definition:Lipschitz Continuity/Point" ]
[ "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Contraction Mapping (Metric Space)", "Banach Fixed-Point Theorem", "Definition:unique", "Definition:Lipschitz Continuity/Point", "Definition:Lipschitz Continuity/Point", "Definition:Uniform Lipschitz Constant", "Definition:Lipschitz Continuity/Lipschitz Constant", "...
proofwiki-13461
Smallest Square Inscribed in Two Pythagorean Triangles
The smallest square with integer sides that can be inscribed within two different Pythagorean triangles so that one side of the square lies on the hypotenuse has side length $780$. The two Pythagorean triangles in question have side lengths $\tuple {1443, 1924, 2405}$ and $\tuple {1145, 2748, 2977}$.
By Inscribed Squares in Right-Angled Triangle/Side Lengths/Side Lies on Hypotenuse: :For a Pythagorean triangle with side lengths $a, b, c$, the required inscribed square has side length given by: ::$\dfrac {abc}{ab + c^2}$ For primitive Pythagorean triples, $a, b, c$ are pairwise coprime, so the above fraction is in c...
The smallest [[Definition:Square (Geometry)|square]] with [[Definition:Integer|integer]] [[Definition:Side of Polygon|sides]] that can be [[Definition:Polygon Inscribed within Polygon|inscribed]] within two different [[Definition:Pythagorean Triangle|Pythagorean triangles]] so that one [[Definition:Side of Polygon|side...
By [[Inscribed Squares in Right-Angled Triangle/Side Lengths/Side Lies on Hypotenuse]]: :For a [[Definition:Pythagorean Triangle|Pythagorean triangle]] with [[Definition:Side of Polygon|side]] [[Definition:Length of Line|lengths]] $a, b, c$, the required [[Definition:Polygon Inscribed within Polygon|inscribed]] [[Defi...
Smallest Square Inscribed in Two Pythagorean Triangles
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smallest_Square_Inscribed_in_Two_Pythagorean_Triangles
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smallest_Square_Inscribed_in_Two_Pythagorean_Triangles
[ "Pythagorean Triangles" ]
[ "Definition:Quadrilateral/Square", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Polygon/Side", "Definition:Inscribe/Polygon in Polygon", "Definition:Pythagorean Triangle", "Definition:Polygon/Side", "Definition:Quadrilateral/Square", "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)/Right-Angled/Hypotenuse", "Definition:Polygon...
[ "Inscribed Squares in Right-Angled Triangle/Side Lengths/Side Lies on Hypotenuse", "Definition:Pythagorean Triangle", "Definition:Polygon/Side", "Definition:Linear Measure/Length", "Definition:Inscribe/Polygon in Polygon", "Definition:Quadrilateral/Square", "Definition:Polygon/Side", "Definition:Linea...
proofwiki-13462
Sequence of Numbers Divisible by Sequence of Primes
The integers in this sequence: :$788, 789, 790, 791, 792, 793$ are divisible by: :$2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13$ respectively.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 788 | r = 2 \times 394 }} {{eqn | l = 789 | r = 3 \times 263 }} {{eqn | l = 790 | r = 5 \times 158 }} {{eqn | l = 791 | r = 7 \times 113 }} {{eqn | l = 792 | r = 11 \times 72 }} {{eqn | l = 793 | r = 13 \times 61 }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
The [[Definition:Positive Integer|integers]] in this [[Definition:Integer Sequence|sequence]]: :$788, 789, 790, 791, 792, 793$ are [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divisible]] by: :$2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13$ respectively.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 788 | r = 2 \times 394 }} {{eqn | l = 789 | r = 3 \times 263 }} {{eqn | l = 790 | r = 5 \times 158 }} {{eqn | l = 791 | r = 7 \times 113 }} {{eqn | l = 792 | r = 11 \times 72 }} {{eqn | l = 793 | r = 13 \times 61 }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
Sequence of Numbers Divisible by Sequence of Primes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sequence_of_Numbers_Divisible_by_Sequence_of_Primes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sequence_of_Numbers_Divisible_by_Sequence_of_Primes
[ "Prime Numbers", "Divisors", "Recreational Mathematics", "788", "789", "790", "791", "792", "793" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Integer Sequence", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer" ]
[]
proofwiki-13463
Numbers whose Square is Palindromic with Even Number of Digits
The sequence of positive integers whose square is a palindromic number with an even number of digits begins: :$836, 798 \, 644, 64 \, 030 \, 648, 83 \, 163 \, 115 \, 486, 6 \, 360 \, 832 \, 925 \, 898, \ldots$ {{OEIS|A016113}}
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 836^2 | r = 698 \, 896 | c = $6$ digits }} {{eqn | l = 798 \, 644^2 | r = 637 \, 832 \, 238 \, 736 | c = $12$ digits }} {{eqn | l = 64 \, 030 \, 648^2 | r = 4 \, 099 \, 923 \, 883 \, 299 \, 904 | c = $16$ digits }} {{eqn | l = 83 \, 163 \, 115 \, 486^2 ...
The [[Definition:Integer Sequence|sequence]] of [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integers]] whose [[Definition:Square (Algebra)|square]] is a [[Definition:Palindromic Number|palindromic number]] with an [[Definition:Even Integer|even number]] of [[Definition:Digit|digits]] begins: :$836, 798 \, 644, 64 \, 030 \, ...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 836^2 | r = 698 \, 896 | c = $6$ [[Definition:Digit|digits]] }} {{eqn | l = 798 \, 644^2 | r = 637 \, 832 \, 238 \, 736 | c = $12$ [[Definition:Digit|digits]] }} {{eqn | l = 64 \, 030 \, 648^2 | r = 4 \, 099 \, 923 \, 883 \, 299 \, 904 | c = $16$ [[Definitio...
Numbers whose Square is Palindromic with Even Number of Digits
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Numbers_whose_Square_is_Palindromic_with_Even_Number_of_Digits
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Numbers_whose_Square_is_Palindromic_with_Even_Number_of_Digits
[ "Square Numbers", "Palindromic Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Integer Sequence", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Square/Function", "Definition:Palindromic Number", "Definition:Even Integer", "Definition:Digit" ]
[ "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Digit" ]
proofwiki-13464
Sum of Sequence of Factorials
The sequence $S = \sequence {s_n}$ defined as: :$\ds s_n = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n k!$ begins: :$1, 3, 9, 33, 153, 873, 5913, 46 \, 233, 409 \, 113, 4 \, 037 \, 913, \ldots$ {{OEIS|A007489}}
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = s_1 | r = 1! | c = }} {{eqn | r = 1 | c = {{Defof|Factorial}} }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = s_2 | r = s_1 + 2! | c = }} {{eqn | r = 1 + 2 | c = {{Defof|Factorial}} }} {{eqn | r = 3 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = s_3 ...
The [[Definition:Integer Sequence|sequence]] $S = \sequence {s_n}$ defined as: :$\ds s_n = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n k!$ begins: :$1, 3, 9, 33, 153, 873, 5913, 46 \, 233, 409 \, 113, 4 \, 037 \, 913, \ldots$ {{OEIS|A007489}}
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = s_1 | r = 1! | c = }} {{eqn | r = 1 | c = {{Defof|Factorial}} }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = s_2 | r = s_1 + 2! | c = }} {{eqn | r = 1 + 2 | c = {{Defof|Factorial}} }} {{eqn | r = 3 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = s_3 ...
Sum of Sequence of Factorials
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Sequence_of_Factorials
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Sequence_of_Factorials
[ "Factorials", "Sums of Sequences" ]
[ "Definition:Integer Sequence" ]
[ "Category:Factorials", "Category:Sums of Sequences" ]
proofwiki-13465
Primitive Semiperfect Numbers which are not Primitive Abundant
The sequence of primitive semiperfect numbers which are not also primitive abundant starts: :$6, 28, 350, 490, 496, 770, 910, 1190, \ldots$ These are semiperfect numbers which are either: : perfect or: : whose only abundant aliquot parts are weird.
A primitive semiperfect number is a semiperfect number which has no aliquot parts which are themselves semiperfect. Thus by definition a primitive semiperfect number is either perfect or abundant. A primitive abundant number is an abundant number whose aliquot parts are all deficient. Thus the perfect numbers: :$6, 28,...
The [[Definition:Integer Sequence|sequence]] of [[Definition:Primitive Semiperfect Number|primitive semiperfect numbers]] which are not also [[Definition:Primitive Abundant Number|primitive abundant]] starts: :$6, 28, 350, 490, 496, 770, 910, 1190, \ldots$ These are [[Definition:Semiperfect Number|semiperfect numbers]...
A [[Definition:Primitive Semiperfect Number|primitive semiperfect number]] is a [[Definition:Semiperfect Number|semiperfect number]] which has no [[Definition:Aliquot Part|aliquot parts]] which are themselves [[Definition:Semiperfect Number|semiperfect]]. Thus by definition a [[Definition:Primitive Semiperfect Number|...
Primitive Semiperfect Numbers which are not Primitive Abundant
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_Semiperfect_Numbers_which_are_not_Primitive_Abundant
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_Semiperfect_Numbers_which_are_not_Primitive_Abundant
[ "Primitive Semiperfect Numbers", "Primitive Abundant Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Integer Sequence", "Definition:Primitive Semiperfect Number", "Definition:Primitive Abundant Number", "Definition:Semiperfect Number", "Definition:Perfect Number", "Definition:Abundant Number", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer/Aliquot Part", "Definition:Weird Number" ]
[ "Definition:Primitive Semiperfect Number", "Definition:Semiperfect Number", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer/Aliquot Part", "Definition:Semiperfect Number", "Definition:Primitive Semiperfect Number", "Definition:Perfect Number", "Definition:Abundant Number", "Definition:Primitive Abundant Number"...
proofwiki-13466
Set of 5 Triplets whose Sums and Products are Equal
The following set of $5$ triplets of integers have the property that: :the sum of the integers in each triplet are equal and: :the product of the integers in each triplet are equal: :$\tuple {6, 480, 495}$, $\tuple {11, 160, 810}$, $\tuple {12, 144, 825}$, $\tuple {20, 81, 880}$, $\tuple {33, 48, 900}$ The sum is $981$...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 6 + 480 + 495 | r = 981 }} {{eqn | l = 11 + 160 + 810 | r = 981 }} {{eqn | l = 12 + 144 + 825 | r = 981 }} {{eqn | l = 20 + 81 + 880 | r = 981 }} {{eqn | l = 33 + 48 + 900 | r = 981 }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 6 \times 480 \times 495 | r = \pare...
The following [[Definition:Set|set]] of $5$ [[Definition:Ordered Triple|triplets]] of [[Definition:Positive Integer|integers]] have the property that: :the [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of the [[Definition:Positive Integer|integers]] in each [[Definition:Ordered Triple|triplet]] are equal and: :the [[Definition:I...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 6 + 480 + 495 | r = 981 }} {{eqn | l = 11 + 160 + 810 | r = 981 }} {{eqn | l = 12 + 144 + 825 | r = 981 }} {{eqn | l = 20 + 81 + 880 | r = 981 }} {{eqn | l = 33 + 48 + 900 | r = 981 }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 6 \times 480 \times 495 | r = \pa...
Set of 5 Triplets whose Sums and Products are Equal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_of_5_Triplets_whose_Sums_and_Products_are_Equal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_of_5_Triplets_whose_Sums_and_Products_are_Equal
[ "Recreational Mathematics", "981", "1,425,600" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Ordered Tuple as Ordered Set/Ordered Triple", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Ordered Tuple as Ordered Set/Ordered Triple", "Definition:Multiplication/Integers", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "De...
[]
proofwiki-13467
Sum of Pandigital Triplet of 3-Digit Primes
The smallest integer which is the sum of a set of $3$ three-digit primes using all $9$ digits from $1$ to $9$ once each is $999$: :$149 + 263 + 587 = 999$
All three-digit primes end in $1, 3, 7, 9$. Suppose $1$ is used as the units digit of a prime. Since the digit $1$ cannot be used again, the sum of the primes is at least: :$221 + 333 + 447 = 1001$ so $1$ cannot be used as a units digit . The units digits of the primes are $3, 7, 9$. To minimise the sum, the hundreds d...
The smallest [[Definition:Integer|integer]] which is the [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of a [[Definition:Set|set]] of $3$ [[Definition:Digit|three-digit]] [[Definition:Prime Number|primes]] using all $9$ [[Definition:Digit|digits]] from $1$ to $9$ once each is $999$: :$149 + 263 + 587 = 999$
All [[Definition:Digit|three-digit]] [[Definition:Prime Number|primes]] end in $1, 3, 7, 9$. Suppose $1$ is used as the units digit of a [[Definition:Prime Number|prime]]. Since the digit $1$ cannot be used again, the sum of the [[Definition:Prime Number|primes]] is at least: :$221 + 333 + 447 = 1001$ so $1$ cannot...
Sum of Pandigital Triplet of 3-Digit Primes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Pandigital_Triplet_of_3-Digit_Primes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Pandigital_Triplet_of_3-Digit_Primes
[ "Prime Numbers", "999" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Digit" ]
[ "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number" ]
proofwiki-13468
Divisibility Test for 7, 11 and 13
Mark off the integer $N$ being tested into groups of $3$ digits. Because of the standard way of presenting integers, this may already be done, for example: :$N = 22 \, 846 \, 293 \, 462 \, 733 \, 356$ Number the groups of $3$ from the right: :$N = \underbrace{22}_6 \, \underbrace{846}_5 \, \underbrace{293}_4 \, \under...
Let $N$ be expressed as: :$N = \ds \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n a_k 1000^k = a_0 + a_1 1000 + a_2 1000^2 + \cdots + a_n 1000^n$ where $n$ is the number of groups of $3$ digits. We have that: :$1000 \equiv -1 \pmod {1001}$ Hence from Congruence of Powers: :$1000^r \equiv \paren {-1}^r \pmod {1001}$ Thus: :$N \equiv a_0 + \par...
Mark off the [[Definition:Integer|integer]] $N$ being tested into groups of $3$ [[Definition:Digit|digits]]. Because of the standard way of presenting [[Definition:Integer|integers]], this may already be done, for example: :$N = 22 \, 846 \, 293 \, 462 \, 733 \, 356$ Number the groups of $3$ from the right: :$N = \u...
Let $N$ be expressed as: :$N = \ds \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n a_k 1000^k = a_0 + a_1 1000 + a_2 1000^2 + \cdots + a_n 1000^n$ where $n$ is the number of groups of $3$ [[Definition:Digit|digits]]. We have that: :$1000 \equiv -1 \pmod {1001}$ Hence from [[Congruence of Powers]]: :$1000^r \equiv \paren {-1}^r \pmod {1001}$ ...
Divisibility Test for 7, 11 and 13
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Divisibility_Test_for_7,_11_and_13
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Divisibility_Test_for_7,_11_and_13
[ "Divisibility Tests", "7", "11", "13", "1001" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Even Integer", "Definition:Subtraction/Integers", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Sign of Number", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer" ]
[ "Definition:Digit", "Congruence of Powers", "Definition:Modulo Addition" ]
proofwiki-13469
Solutions to Diophantine Equation x (x + 1) = y (y + 5) (y + 10) (y + 15)
The Diophantine equation : $n = x \paren {x + 1} = y \paren {y + 5} \paren {y + 10} \paren {y + 15}$ has exactly $2$ solutions in $\N \setminus \set 0$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1056 | r = 32 \times 33 = 1 \times 6 \times 11 \times 16 }} {{eqn | l = 43 \, 056 | r = 207 \times 208 = 8 \times 13 \times 18 \t...
First, we observe that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x \paren {x + 1} | r = \paren {x + \dfrac 1 2 }^2 - \paren {\dfrac 1 2}^2 }} {{eqn | ll = \leadsto | l = x \paren {x + 1} | o = \lt | r = \paren {x + \dfrac 1 2 }^2 }} {{eqn | ll = \leadsto | l = \sqrt {x \paren {x + 1} } | o = \lt ...
The [[Definition:Diophantine Equation|Diophantine equation]] : $n = x \paren {x + 1} = y \paren {y + 5} \paren {y + 10} \paren {y + 15}$ has exactly $2$ solutions in $\N \setminus \set 0$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1056 | r = 32 \times 33 = 1 \times 6 \times 11 \times 16 }} {{eqn | l = 43 \, 056 | r = 207 ...
First, we observe that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x \paren {x + 1} | r = \paren {x + \dfrac 1 2 }^2 - \paren {\dfrac 1 2}^2 }} {{eqn | ll = \leadsto | l = x \paren {x + 1} | o = \lt | r = \paren {x + \dfrac 1 2 }^2 }} {{eqn | ll = \leadsto | l = \sqrt {x \paren {x + 1} } | o = \lt ...
Solutions to Diophantine Equation x (x + 1) = y (y + 5) (y + 10) (y + 15)
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Solutions_to_Diophantine_Equation_x_(x_+_1)_=_y_(y_+_5)_(y_+_10)_(y_+_15)
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Solutions_to_Diophantine_Equation_x_(x_+_1)_=_y_(y_+_5)_(y_+_10)_(y_+_15)
[ "Diophantine Equations" ]
[ "Definition:Diophantine Equation" ]
[ "Definition:Square Root", "Definition:Square Root", "Definition:Fractional Part", "Definition:Fractional Part", "Definition:Square Root", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Fractional Part", "Definition:Fractional Part", "Definition:Square Root", "Solution to Quadratic Equation", "File:Diophantin...
proofwiki-13470
Numbers Reversed when Multiplying by 9
Numbers of the form $\sqbrk {10 (9) 89}_{10}$ are reversed when they are multiplied by $9$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1089 \times 9 | r = 9801 }} {{eqn | l = 10 \, 989 \times 9 | r = 98 \, 901 }} {{eqn | l = 109 \, 989 \times 9 | r = 989 \, 901 }} {{end-eqn}} and so on.
Let k represent the number of $9$s in the middle of the number. For $k > 0$ We can rewrite the number as follows: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sqbrk {10 (9) 89}_{10} | r = 10 \times 10^{k + 2 } + 900 \sum_{i \mathop = 0}^{k - 1} 10^i + 89 | c = {{Defof|Geometric Series}} }} {{end-eqn}} Taking numbers of this ...
Numbers of the form $\sqbrk {10 (9) 89}_{10}$ are [[Definition:Reversal|reversed]] when they are [[Definition:Integer Multiplication|multiplied]] by $9$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1089 \times 9 | r = 9801 }} {{eqn | l = 10 \, 989 \times 9 | r = 98 \, 901 }} {{eqn | l = 109 \, 989 \times 9 | r = 989 \...
Let k represent the number of $9$s in the middle of the number. For $k > 0$ We can rewrite the number as follows: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sqbrk {10 (9) 89}_{10} | r = 10 \times 10^{k + 2 } + 900 \sum_{i \mathop = 0}^{k - 1} 10^i + 89 | c = {{Defof|Geometric Series}} }} {{end-eqn}} Taking numbers of th...
Numbers Reversed when Multiplying by 9
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Numbers_Reversed_when_Multiplying_by_9
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Numbers_Reversed_when_Multiplying_by_9
[ "Reversals", "1089" ]
[ "Definition:Reversal", "Definition:Multiplication/Integers" ]
[ "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Digit" ]
proofwiki-13471
Reciprocal of 1089
:$\dfrac 1 {1089} = 0 \cdotp \dot 00091 \, 82736 \, 45546 \, 37281 \, 9 \dot 1$
Performing the calculation using long division: <pre> 0.00091827364554637281910009... -------------------------------------------- 1089)1.00000000000000000000000000... 9801 5445 1089 ---- ---- ---- 1990 5950 9910 1089 5445 9801 ---- ---- ---- ...
:$\dfrac 1 {1089} = 0 \cdotp \dot 00091 \, 82736 \, 45546 \, 37281 \, 9 \dot 1$
Performing the calculation using [[Definition:Long Division|long division]]: <pre> 0.00091827364554637281910009... -------------------------------------------- 1089)1.00000000000000000000000000... 9801 5445 1089 ---- ---- ---- 1990 5950 9910 1089 5445 9801...
Reciprocal of 1089
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reciprocal_of_1089
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reciprocal_of_1089
[ "1089", "Examples of Reciprocals" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Classical Algorithm/Division" ]
proofwiki-13472
Square which is Difference between Square and Square of Reversal
$33^2 = 65^2 - 56^2$ This is the only square of a $2$-digit number which has this property.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 33^2 | r = 1089 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 65^2 - 56^2 | r = 4225 - 3136 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 1089 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} Let $\sqbrk {xy}$ be a $2$-digit number such that $x \ge y$ and $\sqbrk {xy}^2 - \sqbrk {yx}^2$ is a square of a $2$-digit number. The case $x = y$...
$33^2 = 65^2 - 56^2$ This is the only [[Definition:Square Number|square]] of a $2$-[[Definition:Digit|digit]] number which has this property.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 33^2 | r = 1089 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 65^2 - 56^2 | r = 4225 - 3136 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 1089 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} Let $\sqbrk {xy}$ be a $2$-[[Definition:Digit|digit]] number such that $x \ge y$ and $\sqbrk {xy}^2 - \sqbrk {yx}^2$ is a [[Definition:Square Num...
Square which is Difference between Square and Square of Reversal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Square_which_is_Difference_between_Square_and_Square_of_Reversal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Square_which_is_Difference_between_Square_and_Square_of_Reversal
[ "Square Numbers", "Reversals" ]
[ "Definition:Square Number", "Definition:Digit" ]
[ "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Square Number", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Square Number", "Definition:Digit", "Euclid's Lemma for Prime Divisors", "Absolute Value of Integer is not less than Divisors", "Definition:Square Number", "Definition:Square Number", "Definition:Square Number", "Def...
proofwiki-13473
Numbers for which Sixth Power plus 1091 is Composite
The number $1091$ has the property that: :$x^6 + 1091$ is composite for all integer values of $x$ from $1$ to $3905$.
We check the result and show that it cannot be improved further by showing: :$3906$ is the smallest $x$ such that $x^6 + 1091$ is prime. Suppose $x^6 + 1091$ is prime. Then: :$x$ is a multiple of $42$ :$x$ ends in $0$, $4$ or $6$ in decimal notation :$x \not \equiv \pm 1, \pm 3, \pm 4 \pmod {13}$ :$x \not \equiv \pm 4,...
The number $1091$ has the property that: :$x^6 + 1091$ is [[Definition:Composite Number|composite]] for all [[Definition:Integer|integer]] values of $x$ from $1$ to $3905$.
We check the result and show that it cannot be improved further by showing: :$3906$ is the smallest $x$ such that $x^6 + 1091$ is [[Definition:Prime Number|prime]]. Suppose $x^6 + 1091$ is [[Definition:Prime Number|prime]]. Then: :$x$ is a multiple of $42$ :$x$ ends in $0$, $4$ or $6$ in decimal notation :$x \not \e...
Numbers for which Sixth Power plus 1091 is Composite
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Numbers_for_which_Sixth_Power_plus_1091_is_Composite
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Numbers_for_which_Sixth_Power_plus_1091_is_Composite
[ "Sixth Powers" ]
[ "Definition:Composite Number", "Definition:Integer" ]
[ "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number" ]
proofwiki-13474
1105 as Sum of Two Squares
$1105$ can be expressed as the sum of two squares in more ways than any smaller integer: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1105 | m = 1089 + 16 | mo= = | r = 33^2 + 4^2 | c = }} {{eqn | m = 1024 + 81 | mo= = | r = 32^2 + 9^2 | c = }} {{eqn | m = 961 + 144 | mo= = | r = 31...
Here is the source code of a program in Python that finds all positive integers up to $1105$ that can be written as a sum of two squares in more ways than any smaller positive integer: <syntaxhighlight lang="python"> import numpy as np def two_sq_decomp_rich(n): bound = int(np.floor(np.sqrt(n))) count_of_two_sq...
$1105$ can be expressed as the [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of two [[Definition:Square Number|squares]] in more ways than any smaller [[Definition:Integer|integer]]: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1105 | m = 1089 + 16 | mo= = | r = 33^2 + 4^2 | c = }} {{eqn | m = 1024 + 81 | mo= = ...
Here is the source code of a program in Python that finds all [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integers]] up to $1105$ that can be written as a [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of two [[Definition:Square Number|squares]] in more ways than any smaller [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integer]]: <syntaxhi...
1105 as Sum of Two Squares
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/1105_as_Sum_of_Two_Squares
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/1105_as_Sum_of_Two_Squares
[ "Sums of Squares", "1105", "1105 as Sum of Two Squares" ]
[ "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Square Number", "Definition:Integer" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Square Number", "Definition:Positive/Integer" ]
proofwiki-13475
Difference between Two Squares equal to Repunit/Corollary 1
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 6^2 - 5^2 | r = 11 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 56^2 - 45^2 | r = 1111 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 556^2 - 445^2 | r = 111 \, 111 | c = }} {{eqn | o = : | c = }} {{end-eqn}} and in general for integer $n$: :$R_{2 n} = {\underbrace {55 \ldots 56}_{\text {$n - 1$ $...
From Difference between Two Squares equal to Repunit, $R_{2 n} = x^2 - y^2$ exactly when $R_{2 n} = a b$ where $x = \dfrac {a + b} 2$ and $y = \dfrac {a - b} 2$. By the Basis Representation Theorem {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = R_{2n} | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^{2 n - 1} 10^k | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \math...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 6^2 - 5^2 | r = 11 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 56^2 - 45^2 | r = 1111 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 556^2 - 445^2 | r = 111 \, 111 | c = }} {{eqn | o = : | c = }} {{end-eqn}} and in general for [[Definition:Integer|integer]] $n$: :$R_{2 n} = {\underbrace {55 \ldo...
From [[Difference between Two Squares equal to Repunit]], $R_{2 n} = x^2 - y^2$ exactly when $R_{2 n} = a b$ where $x = \dfrac {a + b} 2$ and $y = \dfrac {a - b} 2$. By the [[Basis Representation Theorem]] {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = R_{2n} | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^{2 n - 1} 10^k | c = }} {{eqn | r = \s...
Difference between Two Squares equal to Repunit/Corollary 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Difference_between_Two_Squares_equal_to_Repunit/Corollary_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Difference_between_Two_Squares_equal_to_Repunit/Corollary_1
[ "Difference between Two Squares equal to Repunit" ]
[ "Definition:Integer" ]
[ "Difference between Two Squares equal to Repunit", "Basis Representation Theorem", "Definition:Summation" ]
proofwiki-13476
Difference between Two Squares equal to Repunit/Corollary 2
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 6^2 - 5^2 | r = 11 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 56^2 - 45^2 | r = 1111 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 5056^2 - 5045^2 | r = 111 \, 111 | c = }} {{eqn | o = : | c = }} {{end-eqn}} and in general for integer $n$: :$R_{2 n} = {\underbrace{5050 \ldots 56}_{n - 1 \ 5 \te...
From Difference between Two Squares equal to Repunit, $R_{2n} = x^2 - y^2$ exactly when $R_{2n} = a b$ where $x = \dfrac {a + b} 2$ and $y = \dfrac {a - b} 2$. By the Basis Representation Theorem {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = R_{2n} | r = \sum_{0 \mathop \le k \mathop < 2 n} 10^k | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{\su...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 6^2 - 5^2 | r = 11 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 56^2 - 45^2 | r = 1111 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 5056^2 - 5045^2 | r = 111 \, 111 | c = }} {{eqn | o = : | c = }} {{end-eqn}} and in general for [[Definition:Integer|integer]] $n$: :$R_{2 n} = {\underbrace{5050 \...
From [[Difference between Two Squares equal to Repunit]], $R_{2n} = x^2 - y^2$ exactly when $R_{2n} = a b$ where $x = \dfrac {a + b} 2$ and $y = \dfrac {a - b} 2$. By the [[Basis Representation Theorem]] {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = R_{2n} | r = \sum_{0 \mathop \le k \mathop < 2 n} 10^k | c = }} {{eqn | r ...
Difference between Two Squares equal to Repunit/Corollary 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Difference_between_Two_Squares_equal_to_Repunit/Corollary_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Difference_between_Two_Squares_equal_to_Repunit/Corollary_2
[ "Difference between Two Squares equal to Repunit" ]
[ "Definition:Integer" ]
[ "Difference between Two Squares equal to Repunit", "Basis Representation Theorem", "Category:Difference between Two Squares equal to Repunit" ]
proofwiki-13477
Sixth Power as Sum of 7 Sixth Powers
The smallest known integer whose $6$th power can be expressed as the sum of $7$ smaller $6$th powers is $1141$: :$1141^6 = 74^6 + 234^6 + 402^6 + 474^6 + 702^6 + 894^6 + 1077^6$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | r = 74^6 + 234^6 + 402^6 + 474^6 + 702^6 + 894^6 + 1077^6 | o = | c = }} {{eqn | r = 164 \, 206 \, 490 \, 176 | c = }} {{eqn | o = | ro= + | r = 164 \, 170 \, 508 \, 913 \, 216 | c = }} {{eqn | o = | ro= + | r = 4 \, 220 \, 426 \, 278 \, 476 \,...
The smallest known [[Definition:Integer|integer]] whose [[Definition:Sixth Power|$6$th power]] can be expressed as the [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of $7$ smaller [[Definition:Sixth Power|$6$th powers]] is $1141$: :$1141^6 = 74^6 + 234^6 + 402^6 + 474^6 + 702^6 + 894^6 + 1077^6$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | r = 74^6 + 234^6 + 402^6 + 474^6 + 702^6 + 894^6 + 1077^6 | o = | c = }} {{eqn | r = 164 \, 206 \, 490 \, 176 | c = }} {{eqn | o = | ro= + | r = 164 \, 170 \, 508 \, 913 \, 216 | c = }} {{eqn | o = | ro= + | r = 4 \, 220 \, 426 \, 278 \, 476 \,...
Sixth Power as Sum of 7 Sixth Powers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sixth_Power_as_Sum_of_7_Sixth_Powers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sixth_Power_as_Sum_of_7_Sixth_Powers
[ "Sixth Powers", "1141" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Sixth Power", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Sixth Power" ]
[]
proofwiki-13478
Square Numbers which are Sum of Sequence of Odd Cubes
The sequence of square numbers which can be expressed as the sum of a sequence of odd cubes from $1$ begins: :$1, 1225, 1 \, 413 \, 721, 1 \, 631 \, 432 \, 881, \dotsc$ {{OEIS|A046177}} The sequence of square roots of this sequence is: :$1, 35, 1189, 40 \, 391, \dotsc$ {{OEIS|A046176}}
We have that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1225 | r = 35^2 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^5 \paren {2 k - 1}^3 = 1^3 + 3^3 + 5^3 + 7^3 + 9^3 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 1 \, 413 \, 721 | r = 1189^2 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^{29} \paren {2 k - 1}^3 = 1^3 + 3^3 + 5^3 + \d...
The [[Definition:Integer Sequence|sequence]] of [[Definition:Square Number|square numbers]] which can be expressed as the [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of a [[Definition:Integer Sequence|sequence]] of [[Definition:Odd Number|odd]] [[Definition:Cube Number|cubes]] from $1$ begins: :$1, 1225, 1 \, 413 \, 721, 1 \,...
We have that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1225 | r = 35^2 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^5 \paren {2 k - 1}^3 = 1^3 + 3^3 + 5^3 + 7^3 + 9^3 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 1 \, 413 \, 721 | r = 1189^2 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^{29} \paren {2 k - 1}^3 = 1^3 + 3^3 + 5^3 + \...
Square Numbers which are Sum of Sequence of Odd Cubes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Square_Numbers_which_are_Sum_of_Sequence_of_Odd_Cubes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Square_Numbers_which_are_Sum_of_Sequence_of_Odd_Cubes
[ "Square Numbers", "Sums of Sequences", "Cube Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Integer Sequence", "Definition:Square Number", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Integer Sequence", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Cube Number", "Definition:Integer Sequence", "Definition:Square Root", "Definition:Integer Sequence" ]
[ "Sum of Sequence of Odd Cubes", "Definition:Square Number", "Definition:Pell's Equation", "Pell's Equation/Examples/2/-1", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Multiplication/Integers", "Definition:Integer Sequence", "Definition:Square Root" ]
proofwiki-13479
Retract of Injective Space is Injective
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be an injective topological space. Let $R = \struct {Z, \tau'}$ be a retract of $T$. Then $R$ is injective.
By definition of retract: :there exists a continuous retraction $r: S \to Z$ of $T$. Let $\YY = \struct {Y, \sigma}$ be a topological space. Let $f: Y \to Z$ be a continuous mapping. Let $\XX = \struct {X, \sigma'}$ such that :$\YY$ is topological subspace of $\XX$. By Inclusion Mapping is Continuous: :$i_Z$ is continu...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be an [[Definition:Injective Space|injective topological space]]. Let $R = \struct {Z, \tau'}$ be a [[Definition:Retract (Topology)|retract]] of $T$. Then $R$ is [[Definition:Injective Space|injective]].
By definition of [[Definition:Retract (Topology)|retract]]: :there exists a [[Definition:Continuous (Topology)|continuous]] [[Definition:Retraction (Topology)|retraction]] $r: S \to Z$ of $T$. Let $\YY = \struct {Y, \sigma}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $f: Y \to Z$ be a [[Definition:C...
Retract of Injective Space is Injective
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Retract_of_Injective_Space_is_Injective
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Retract_of_Injective_Space_is_Injective
[ "Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Injective Space", "Definition:Retract (Topology)", "Definition:Injective Space" ]
[ "Definition:Retract (Topology)", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Retraction (Topology)", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Topological Subspace", "Inclusion Mapping is Continuous", "Definition:Continu...
proofwiki-13480
Numbers equal to Sum of Squares of two Parts
Integers that can be split into two parts whose squares add up to it include: :$1233 = 12^2 + 33^2$ :$8833 = 88^2 + 33^2$ {{expand|Need to establish the parameters of this}}
{{ProofWanted|Need to establish exactly what is to be proved}}
[[Definition:Integer|Integers]] that can be split into two parts whose [[Definition:Square (Algebra)|squares]] add up to it include: :$1233 = 12^2 + 33^2$ :$8833 = 88^2 + 33^2$ {{expand|Need to establish the parameters of this}}
{{ProofWanted|Need to establish exactly what is to be proved}}
Numbers equal to Sum of Squares of two Parts
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Numbers_equal_to_Sum_of_Squares_of_two_Parts
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Numbers_equal_to_Sum_of_Squares_of_two_Parts
[ "Sums of Squares", "Recreational Mathematics" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Square/Function" ]
[]
proofwiki-13481
Triples of Consecutive Sphenic Numbers
The sequence of triplets of consecutive sphenic numbers starts: :$\tuple {1309, 1310, 1311}, \tuple {1885, 1886, 1887}, \tuple {2013, 2014, 2015}, \ldots$ {{OEIS|A066509|order = first}} {{OEIS|A248202|order = middle}}
Note that there cannot be quadruplets of such numbers, since one of the quadruplets must be divisible by $4$, making it non-sphenic. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1309 | r = 7 \times 11 \times 17 }} {{eqn | l = 1310 | r = 2 \times 5 \times 131 }} {{eqn | l = 1311 | r = 3 \times 19 \times 23 }} {{...
The [[Definition:Sequence|sequence]] of [[Definition:Ordered Triple|triplets]] of consecutive [[Definition:Sphenic Number|sphenic numbers]] starts: :$\tuple {1309, 1310, 1311}, \tuple {1885, 1886, 1887}, \tuple {2013, 2014, 2015}, \ldots$ {{OEIS|A066509|order = first}} {{OEIS|A248202|order = middle}}
Note that there cannot be [[Definition:Ordered Quadruple|quadruplets]] of such numbers, since one of the [[Definition:Ordered Quadruple|quadruplets]] must be [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divisible]] by $4$, making it non-[[Definition:Sphenic Number|sphenic]]. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1309 | r = 7 \t...
Triples of Consecutive Sphenic Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Triples_of_Consecutive_Sphenic_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Triples_of_Consecutive_Sphenic_Numbers
[ "Sphenic Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Ordered Tuple as Ordered Set/Ordered Triple", "Definition:Sphenic Number" ]
[ "Definition:Ordered Tuple as Ordered Set/Ordered Quadruple", "Definition:Ordered Tuple as Ordered Set/Ordered Quadruple", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Sphenic Number", "Definition:Sphenic Number" ]
proofwiki-13482
Cube Number as Sum of Three Consecutive Odd Squares
:$1331 = 11^3 = 19^2 + 21^2 + 23^2$ No other such sequence of $3$ consecutive odd squares has the same property.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 19^2 + 21^2 + 23^2 | r = 361 + 441 + 529 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 1331 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} Any sequence of $3$ consecutive odd integers that have squares that sum to a cube would satisfy: :$m^3 = \paren {n - 2}^2 + n^2 + \paren {n + 2}^2$ where $n$ is the middle number of the ...
:$1331 = 11^3 = 19^2 + 21^2 + 23^2$ No other such [[Definition:Integer Sequence|sequence]] of $3$ consecutive [[Definition:Odd Integer|odd]] [[Definition:Square Number|squares]] has the same property.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 19^2 + 21^2 + 23^2 | r = 361 + 441 + 529 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 1331 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} Any [[Definition:Integer Sequence|sequence]] of $3$ consecutive [[Definition:Odd Integer|odd integers]] that have [[Definition:Square Number|squares]] that [[Definition:Integer Addition...
Cube Number as Sum of Three Consecutive Odd Squares
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cube_Number_as_Sum_of_Three_Consecutive_Odd_Squares
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cube_Number_as_Sum_of_Three_Consecutive_Odd_Squares
[ "Cube Numbers", "Sums of Squares", "1331" ]
[ "Definition:Integer Sequence", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Square Number" ]
[ "Definition:Integer Sequence", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Square Number", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Cube Number", "Definition:Integer Sequence", "Square of Sum", "Square of Difference", "Definition:Elliptic Curve", "Definition:Elliptic Curve", "Definition:Lattice Poi...
proofwiki-13483
Smallest Triplet of Consecutive Integers Divisible by Cube
The smallest sequence of triplets of consecutive integers each of which is divisible by a cube greater than $1$ is: :$\tuple {1375, 1376, 1377}$
We will show that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1375 | r = 11 \times 5^3 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 1376 | r = 172 \times 2^3 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 1377 | r = 51 \times 3^3 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} is the smallest such triplet. Each number in such triplets of consecutive integers is divisible b...
The smallest [[Definition:Sequence|sequence]] of [[Definition:Ordered Triple|triplets]] of consecutive [[Definition:Integer|integers]] each of which is [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divisible]] by a [[Definition:Cube Number|cube]] greater than $1$ is: :$\tuple {1375, 1376, 1377}$
We will show that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1375 | r = 11 \times 5^3 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 1376 | r = 172 \times 2^3 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 1377 | r = 51 \times 3^3 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} is the smallest such [[Definition:Ordered Triple|triplet]]. Each number in such [[Definition:...
Smallest Triplet of Consecutive Integers Divisible by Cube
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smallest_Triplet_of_Consecutive_Integers_Divisible_by_Cube
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smallest_Triplet_of_Consecutive_Integers_Divisible_by_Cube
[ "Cube Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Ordered Tuple as Ordered Set/Ordered Triple", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Cube Number" ]
[ "Definition:Ordered Tuple as Ordered Set/Ordered Triple", "Definition:Ordered Tuple as Ordered Set/Ordered Triple", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Cube Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Chinese Remainder Theorem", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", ...
proofwiki-13484
Smallest Quadruplet of Consecutive Integers Divisible by Cube
The smallest sequence of quadruplets of consecutive integers each of which is divisible by a cube greater than $1$ is: :$\tuple {22 \, 624, 22 \, 625, 22 \, 626, 22 \, 627}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 22 \, 624 | r = 2828 \times 2^3 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 22 \, 625 | r = 181 \times 5^3 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 22 \, 626 | r = 838 \times 3^3 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 22 \, 627 | r = 17 \times 11^3 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{ProofWanted|It remains to be sh...
The smallest [[Definition:Sequence|sequence]] of [[Definition:Ordered Quadruple|quadruplets]] of consecutive [[Definition:Integer|integers]] each of which is [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divisible]] by a [[Definition:Cube Number|cube]] greater than $1$ is: :$\tuple {22 \, 624, 22 \, 625, 22 \, 626, 22 \, 627}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 22 \, 624 | r = 2828 \times 2^3 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 22 \, 625 | r = 181 \times 5^3 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 22 \, 626 | r = 838 \times 3^3 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 22 \, 627 | r = 17 \times 11^3 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{ProofWanted|It remains to be s...
Smallest Quadruplet of Consecutive Integers Divisible by Cube
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smallest_Quadruplet_of_Consecutive_Integers_Divisible_by_Cube
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smallest_Quadruplet_of_Consecutive_Integers_Divisible_by_Cube
[ "Cube Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Ordered Tuple as Ordered Set/Ordered Quadruple", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Cube Number" ]
[]
proofwiki-13485
Riemann Zeta Function as a Multiple Integral
For $n \in \Z_{> 0}$, the Riemann zeta function is given by: :$\ds \map \zeta n = \int_{\closedint 0 1^n} \frac 1 {1 - \prod_{i \mathop = 1}^n x_i} \prod_{i \mathop = 1}^n \rd x_i$ where $\closedint 0 1^n$ denotes the Cartesian $n$th power of the closed real interval $\closedint 0 1$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int_{\closedint 0 1^n} \frac 1 {1 - \prod_{i \mathop = 1}^n x_i} \prod_{i \mathop = 1}^n \rd x_i | r = \int_{\closedint 0 1^n} \sum_{j \mathop = 1}^\infty \paren {\prod_{i \mathop = 1}^n x_i}^{j - 1} \prod_{i \mathop = 1}^n \rd x_i | c = Sum of Infinite Geometric Sequence }} {{e...
For $n \in \Z_{> 0}$, the [[Definition:Riemann Zeta Function|Riemann zeta function]] is given by: :$\ds \map \zeta n = \int_{\closedint 0 1^n} \frac 1 {1 - \prod_{i \mathop = 1}^n x_i} \prod_{i \mathop = 1}^n \rd x_i$ where $\closedint 0 1^n$ denotes the [[Definition:Cartesian Space|Cartesian $n$th power]] of the [[D...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int_{\closedint 0 1^n} \frac 1 {1 - \prod_{i \mathop = 1}^n x_i} \prod_{i \mathop = 1}^n \rd x_i | r = \int_{\closedint 0 1^n} \sum_{j \mathop = 1}^\infty \paren {\prod_{i \mathop = 1}^n x_i}^{j - 1} \prod_{i \mathop = 1}^n \rd x_i | c = [[Sum of Infinite Geometric Sequence]] }}...
Riemann Zeta Function as a Multiple Integral
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Riemann_Zeta_Function_as_a_Multiple_Integral
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Riemann_Zeta_Function_as_a_Multiple_Integral
[ "Riemann Zeta Function", "Analytic Number Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Riemann Zeta Function", "Definition:Cartesian Product/Cartesian Space", "Definition:Real Interval/Closed" ]
[ "Sum of Infinite Geometric Sequence", "Integral of Series of Positive Measurable Functions", "Fubini's Theorem", "Fubini's Theorem", "Integral of Power", "Category:Riemann Zeta Function", "Category:Analytic Number Theory" ]
proofwiki-13486
Closed Form for Hexagonal Pyramidal Numbers
The closed-form expression for the $n$th hexagonal pyramidal number is: :$S_n = \dfrac {n \paren {n + 1} \paren {4 n - 1} } 6$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = S_n | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n H_k | c = {{Defof|Hexagonal Pyramidal Number}} }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n k \paren {2 k - 1} | c = Closed Form for Hexagonal Numbers }} {{eqn | r = 3 \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n 2 k^2 - \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n k | c = }} {{eqn | r ...
The [[Definition:Closed-Form Expression|closed-form expression]] for the $n$th [[Definition:Hexagonal Pyramidal Number|hexagonal pyramidal number]] is: :$S_n = \dfrac {n \paren {n + 1} \paren {4 n - 1} } 6$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = S_n | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n H_k | c = {{Defof|Hexagonal Pyramidal Number}} }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n k \paren {2 k - 1} | c = [[Closed Form for Hexagonal Numbers]] }} {{eqn | r = 3 \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n 2 k^2 - \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n k | c = }} {{eqn ...
Closed Form for Hexagonal Pyramidal Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closed_Form_for_Hexagonal_Pyramidal_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closed_Form_for_Hexagonal_Pyramidal_Numbers
[ "Closed Forms", "Pyramidal Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Closed Form Expression", "Definition:Hexagonal Pyramidal Number" ]
[ "Closed Form for Hexagonal Numbers", "Sum of Sequence of Squares", "Closed Form for Triangular Numbers", "Category:Closed Forms", "Category:Pyramidal Numbers" ]
proofwiki-13487
Tetrahedral and Triangular Numbers
The only positive integers which are simultaneously tetrahedral and triangular are: :$1, 10, 120, 1540, 7140$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1 | r = \dfrac {1 \paren {1 + 1} \paren {1 + 2} } 6 | c = Closed Form for Tetrahedral Numbers }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {1 \times \paren {1 + 1} } 2 | c = Closed Form for Triangular Numbers }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 10 | r = \dfrac {3 \paren {3 + 1} \paren {3...
The only [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integers]] which are simultaneously [[Definition:Tetrahedral Number|tetrahedral]] and [[Definition:Triangular Number|triangular]] are: :$1, 10, 120, 1540, 7140$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1 | r = \dfrac {1 \paren {1 + 1} \paren {1 + 2} } 6 | c = [[Closed Form for Tetrahedral Numbers]] }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {1 \times \paren {1 + 1} } 2 | c = [[Closed Form for Triangular Numbers]] }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 10 | r = \dfrac {3 \paren {3 + 1}...
Tetrahedral and Triangular Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Tetrahedral_and_Triangular_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Tetrahedral_and_Triangular_Numbers
[ "Triangular Numbers", "Pyramidal Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Tetrahedral Number", "Definition:Triangular Number" ]
[ "Closed Form for Tetrahedral Numbers", "Closed Form for Triangular Numbers", "Closed Form for Tetrahedral Numbers", "Closed Form for Triangular Numbers", "Closed Form for Tetrahedral Numbers", "Closed Form for Triangular Numbers", "Closed Form for Tetrahedral Numbers", "Closed Form for Triangular Numb...
proofwiki-13488
Restriction of Composition is Composition of Restriction
Let $X, Y, Z$ be sets. Let $f: X \to Y$ and $g: Y \to Z$ be mappings. Let $S \subseteq X$. Then: :$\paren {g \circ f} \restriction S = g \circ \paren {f \restriction S}$
By definitions of composition of mappings and restriction of mapping: :$\paren {g \circ f} \restriction S: S \to Z$ and $g \circ \paren {f \restriction S}: S \to Z$ Let $s \in S$. By definition of restriction of mapping: :$\map {\paren {\paren {g \circ f} \restriction S} } s = \map {\paren {g \circ f} } s$ Thus {{begin...
Let $X, Y, Z$ be [[Definition:Set|sets]]. Let $f: X \to Y$ and $g: Y \to Z$ be [[Definition:Mapping|mappings]]. Let $S \subseteq X$. Then: :$\paren {g \circ f} \restriction S = g \circ \paren {f \restriction S}$
By definitions of [[Definition:Composition of Mappings|composition of mappings]] and [[Definition:Restriction of Mapping|restriction of mapping]]: :$\paren {g \circ f} \restriction S: S \to Z$ and $g \circ \paren {f \restriction S}: S \to Z$ Let $s \in S$. By definition of [[Definition:Restriction of Mapping|restrict...
Restriction of Composition is Composition of Restriction
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Restriction_of_Composition_is_Composition_of_Restriction
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Restriction_of_Composition_is_Composition_of_Restriction
[ "Mapping Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Mapping" ]
[ "Definition:Composition of Mappings", "Definition:Restriction/Mapping", "Definition:Restriction/Mapping" ]
proofwiki-13489
Odd Numbers not Sum of Prime and Power
The sequence of odd numbers which cannot be expressed as the sum of a perfect power and a prime number begins: :$1, 5, 1549, 1 \, 771 \, 561, \ldots$ {{OEIS|A119747}} It is not known if there are any more terms.
The cases $1$ and $5$ are trivial. Now we show that $1549 - a^b$ is never prime for $a \ge 1$ and $b \ge 2$. It suffices to show the result for prime values of $b$. We first prove: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | l = 2 | o = \divides | r = a }} {{eqn | n = 2 | l = 3 | o = \divides | r ...
The [[Definition:Integer Sequence|sequence]] of [[Definition:Odd Integer|odd numbers]] which cannot be expressed as the [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of a [[Definition:Perfect Power|perfect power]] and a [[Definition:Prime Number|prime number]] begins: :$1, 5, 1549, 1 \, 771 \, 561, \ldots$ {{OEIS|A119747}} It i...
The cases $1$ and $5$ are trivial. Now we show that $1549 - a^b$ is never [[Definition:Prime Number|prime]] for $a \ge 1$ and $b \ge 2$. It suffices to show the result for [[Definition:Prime Number|prime]] values of $b$. We first prove: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | l = 2 | o = \divides | r = a }} ...
Odd Numbers not Sum of Prime and Power
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Odd_Numbers_not_Sum_of_Prime_and_Power
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Odd_Numbers_not_Sum_of_Prime_and_Power
[ "Powers", "Prime Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Integer Sequence", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Perfect Power", "Definition:Prime Number" ]
[ "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Even Integer", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Perfect Power", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Square Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:...
proofwiki-13490
One-Digit Number is Harshad
Let $n$ be a $1$-digit positive integer. Then $n$ is a harshad number.
By definition, a harshad number is divisible by the sum of its digits base $10$. Let $n$ be a $1$-digit positive integer. The sum of the digits of $n$ is trivially $n$. The result follows from Integer Divides Itself. {{qed}} Category:Harshad Numbers kxykvvanwxcz0ibl71hfbpqgniu0v7p
Let $n$ be a [[Definition:Digit|$1$-digit]] [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integer]]. Then $n$ is a [[Definition:Harshad Number|harshad number]].
By definition, a [[Definition:Harshad Number|harshad number]] is [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divisible]] by the [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of its [[Definition:Digit|digits]] [[Definition:Decimal Notation|base $10$]]. Let $n$ be a [[Definition:Digit|$1$-digit]] [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive intege...
One-Digit Number is Harshad
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/One-Digit_Number_is_Harshad
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/One-Digit_Number_is_Harshad
[ "Harshad Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Harshad Number" ]
[ "Definition:Harshad Number", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Decimal Notation", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Digit", "Integer Divisor Results/Integer Divides It...
proofwiki-13491
Smallest Fermat Pseudoprime to Bases 2, 3 and 5
The smallest Fermat pseudoprime to bases $2$, $3$ and $5$ is $1729$.
{{ProofWanted|We have the list of Poulet numbers and Fermat pseudoprimes base $3$, but not of base $5$. Once we get that list, we can find the numbers on the list for both.}}
The smallest [[Definition:Fermat Pseudoprime|Fermat pseudoprime]] to bases $2$, $3$ and $5$ is $1729$.
{{ProofWanted|We have the list of [[Definition:Poulet Number|Poulet numbers]] and [[Definition:Fermat Pseudoprime/Base 3|Fermat pseudoprimes base $3$]], but not of base $5$. Once we get that list, we can find the numbers on the list for both.}}
Smallest Fermat Pseudoprime to Bases 2, 3 and 5
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smallest_Fermat_Pseudoprime_to_Bases_2,_3_and_5
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smallest_Fermat_Pseudoprime_to_Bases_2,_3_and_5
[ "Fermat Pseudoprimes", "1729" ]
[ "Definition:Fermat Pseudoprime" ]
[ "Definition:Poulet Number", "Definition:Fermat Pseudoprime/Base 3" ]
proofwiki-13492
Numbers that Factorise into Sum of Digits and Reversal
The following positive integers can each be expressed as the product of the sum of its digits and the reversal of the sum of its digits: :$1, 81, 1458, 1729$ {{OEIS|A110921}}
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1 | r = 1 \times 1 }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 81 | r = 9 \times 9 }} {{eqn | r = 9 \times \paren {8 + 1} }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1458 | r = 81 \times 18 }} {{eqn | r = 81 \times \paren {1 + 4 + 5 + 8} }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 172...
The following [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integers]] can each be expressed as the [[Definition:Integer Multiplication|product]] of the [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of its [[Definition:Digit|digits]] and the [[Definition:Reversal|reversal]] of the [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of its [[Definition...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1 | r = 1 \times 1 }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 81 | r = 9 \times 9 }} {{eqn | r = 9 \times \paren {8 + 1} }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1458 | r = 81 \times 18 }} {{eqn | r = 81 \times \paren {1 + 4 + 5 + 8} }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l...
Numbers that Factorise into Sum of Digits and Reversal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Numbers_that_Factorise_into_Sum_of_Digits_and_Reversal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Numbers_that_Factorise_into_Sum_of_Digits_and_Reversal
[ "Fermat Pseudoprimes", "1729" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Multiplication/Integers", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Reversal", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Digit" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Reversal", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Integer", "Equal Numbers are Congruent", "Congruence of Sum of Digits to Base Less 1", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Integer...
proofwiki-13493
1782 is 3 Times Sum of all 2-Digit Numbers from its Digits
$1782$ equals $3$ multiplied by the sum of all the $2$-digit integers that can be formed from its digits.
The number of $2$-digit integers that can be formed from the digits of $1782$ equals the number of $2$-permutations of $\set {1, 7, 8, 2}$. That is: :$\set {17, 18, 12, 71, 78, 72, 81, 87, 82, 21, 27, 28}$ Hence: :$17 + 18 + 12 + 71 + 78 + 72 + 81 + 87 + 82 + 21 + 27 + 28 = 594 = \dfrac {1782} 3$ {{qed}}
$1782$ equals $3$ [[Definition:Integer Multiplication|multiplied by]] the [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of all the [[Definition:Digit|$2$-digit]] [[Definition:Integer|integers]] that can be formed from its [[Definition:Digit|digits]].
The number of [[Definition:Digit|$2$-digit]] [[Definition:Integer|integers]] that can be formed from the [[Definition:Digit|digits]] of $1782$ equals the number of [[Definition:Permutation (Ordered Selection)|$2$-permutations]] of $\set {1, 7, 8, 2}$. That is: :$\set {17, 18, 12, 71, 78, 72, 81, 87, 82, 21, 27, 28}$ ...
1782 is 3 Times Sum of all 2-Digit Numbers from its Digits
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/1782_is_3_Times_Sum_of_all_2-Digit_Numbers_from_its_Digits
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/1782_is_3_Times_Sum_of_all_2-Digit_Numbers_from_its_Digits
[ "Recreational Mathematics", "1782" ]
[ "Definition:Multiplication/Integers", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Digit" ]
[ "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Permutation/Ordered Selection" ]
proofwiki-13494
Triple of Consecutive Happy Numbers
The smallest triple of consecutive integers all of which are happy is: :$\left({1880, 1881, 1882}\right)$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = 1880 | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = 1^2 + 8^2 + 8^2 + 0^2 | r = 1 + 64 + 64 + 0 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 129 | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = 1^2 + 2^2 + 9^2 | r = 1 + 4 + 81 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 86 | c = }} {{eqn | ll...
The smallest [[Definition:Ordered Triple|triple]] of consecutive [[Definition:Integer|integers]] all of which are [[Definition:Happy Number|happy]] is: :$\left({1880, 1881, 1882}\right)$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = 1880 | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = 1^2 + 8^2 + 8^2 + 0^2 | r = 1 + 64 + 64 + 0 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 129 | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = 1^2 + 2^2 + 9^2 | r = 1 + 4 + 81 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 86 | c = }} {{eqn | ll...
Triple of Consecutive Happy Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Triple_of_Consecutive_Happy_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Triple_of_Consecutive_Happy_Numbers
[ "Happy Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Ordered Tuple as Ordered Set/Ordered Triple", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Happy Number" ]
[ "Definition:Happy Number", "Definition:Happy Number", "Definition:Happy Number" ]
proofwiki-13495
Numbers whose Digits are Unchanged when Subtracting Reversal
The following sequence consists of the integers which have the property that subtraction of their reversals results in anagrams of them: :$954, 1980, 2961, 3870, 5823, 7641, 9108, 19980, 29880, 29961, 32760, \ldots$ {{OEIS|A121969}}
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 954 - 459 | r = 495 }} {{eqn | l = 1980 - 0891 | r = 1089 }} {{eqn | l = 2961 - 1692 | r = 1269 }} {{eqn | l = 3870 - 0783 | r = 3087 }} {{eqn | l = 5823 - 3285 | r = 2538 }} {{eqn | l = 7641 - 1467 | r = 6174 }} {{eqn | l = 9108 - 8019 | r = 1089 }} {...
The following [[Definition:Integer Sequence|sequence]] consists of the [[Definition:Integer|integers]] which have the property that [[Definition:Integer Subtraction|subtraction]] of their [[Definition:Reversal|reversals]] results in [[Definition:Anagram|anagrams]] of them: :$954, 1980, 2961, 3870, 5823, 7641, 9108, 199...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 954 - 459 | r = 495 }} {{eqn | l = 1980 - 0891 | r = 1089 }} {{eqn | l = 2961 - 1692 | r = 1269 }} {{eqn | l = 3870 - 0783 | r = 3087 }} {{eqn | l = 5823 - 3285 | r = 2538 }} {{eqn | l = 7641 - 1467 | r = 6174 }} {{eqn | l = 9108 - 8019 | r = 1089 }} {...
Numbers whose Digits are Unchanged when Subtracting Reversal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Numbers_whose_Digits_are_Unchanged_when_Subtracting_Reversal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Numbers_whose_Digits_are_Unchanged_when_Subtracting_Reversal
[ "Reversals", "Anagrams" ]
[ "Definition:Integer Sequence", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Subtraction/Integers", "Definition:Reversal", "Definition:Anagram" ]
[]
proofwiki-13496
Sequence of Composite Mersenne Numbers
The sequence of Mersenne numbers which are composite begins: :$2047, 8 \, 388 \, 607, 536 \, 870 \, 911, 137 \, 438 \, 953 \, 471, 2 \, 199 \, 023 \, 255 \, 551,\ldots$ {{OEIS|A065341}} The sequence of corresponding indices $p$ such that $2^p - 1$ is composite begins: :$11, 23, 29, 37, 41, 43, 47, 53, 59, 67, 71, 73, 7...
Established by inspecting the sequence of Mersenne numbers: :$3, 7, 31, 127, 2047, 8191, 131 \, 071, 524 \, 287, 8 \, 388 \, 607, 536 \, 870 \, 911, 2 \, 147 \, 483 \, 647, \ldots$ and removing from it the sequence of Mersenne primes: :$3, 7, 31, 127, 8191, 131 \, 071, 524 \, 287, 2 \, 147 \, 483 \, 647, \ldots$ {{qed}...
The [[Definition:Integer Sequence|sequence]] of [[Definition:Mersenne Number|Mersenne numbers]] which are [[Definition:Composite Number|composite]] begins: :$2047, 8 \, 388 \, 607, 536 \, 870 \, 911, 137 \, 438 \, 953 \, 471, 2 \, 199 \, 023 \, 255 \, 551,\ldots$ {{OEIS|A065341}} The [[Definition:Integer Sequence|sequ...
Established by inspecting the [[Definition:Mersenne Number/Sequence|sequence of Mersenne numbers]]: :$3, 7, 31, 127, 2047, 8191, 131 \, 071, 524 \, 287, 8 \, 388 \, 607, 536 \, 870 \, 911, 2 \, 147 \, 483 \, 647, \ldots$ and removing from it the [[Mersenne Prime/Current Status|sequence of Mersenne primes]]: :$3, 7, 31...
Sequence of Composite Mersenne Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sequence_of_Composite_Mersenne_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sequence_of_Composite_Mersenne_Numbers
[ "Mersenne Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Integer Sequence", "Definition:Mersenne Number", "Definition:Composite Number", "Definition:Integer Sequence", "Definition:Composite Number", "Definition:Integer Sequence", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Composite Number" ]
[ "Definition:Mersenne Number/Sequence", "Mersenne Prime/Current Status" ]
proofwiki-13497
Numbers Reversed when Multiplying by 4
Numbers of the form $\sqbrk {21 \paren 9 78}_{10}$ are reversed when they are multiplied by $4$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 2178 \times 4 | r = 8712 }} {{eqn | l = 21 \, 978 \times 4 | r = 87 \, 912 }} {{eqn | l = 219 \, 978 \times 4 | r = 879 \, 912 }} {{end-eqn}} and so on.
Let k represent the number of $9$s in the middle of the number. For $k > 0$ We can rewrite the number as follows: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sqbrk {21 (9) 78}_{10} | r = 21 \times 10^{k + 2 } + 900 \sum_{i \mathop = 0}^{k - 1} 10^i + 78 | c = {{Defof|Geometric Series}} }} {{end-eqn}} Taking numbers of this ...
Numbers of the form $\sqbrk {21 \paren 9 78}_{10}$ are [[Definition:Reversal|reversed]] when they are [[Definition:Integer Multiplication|multiplied]] by $4$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 2178 \times 4 | r = 8712 }} {{eqn | l = 21 \, 978 \times 4 | r = 87 \, 912 }} {{eqn | l = 219 \, 978 \times 4 | r = ...
Let k represent the number of $9$s in the middle of the number. For $k > 0$ We can rewrite the number as follows: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sqbrk {21 (9) 78}_{10} | r = 21 \times 10^{k + 2 } + 900 \sum_{i \mathop = 0}^{k - 1} 10^i + 78 | c = {{Defof|Geometric Series}} }} {{end-eqn}} Taking numbers of th...
Numbers Reversed when Multiplying by 4
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Numbers_Reversed_when_Multiplying_by_4
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Numbers_Reversed_when_Multiplying_by_4
[ "Reversals", "2178" ]
[ "Definition:Reversal", "Definition:Multiplication/Integers" ]
[ "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Digit" ]
proofwiki-13498
17 Consecutive Integers each with Common Factor with Product of other 16
The $17$ consecutive integers from $2184$ to $2200$ have the property that each one is not coprime with the product of the other $16$.
We obtain the prime decomposition of all $17$ of these integers: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 2184 | r = 2^3 \times 3 \times 7 \times 13 }} {{eqn | l = 2185 | r = 5 \times 19 \times 23 }} {{eqn | l = 2186 | r = 2 \times 1093 }} {{eqn | l = 2187 | r = 3^7 }} {{eqn | l = 2188 | r = 2^2 \times 5...
The $17$ consecutive [[Definition:Integer|integers]] from $2184$ to $2200$ have the property that each one is not [[Definition:Coprime Integers|coprime]] with the [[Definition:Integer Multiplication|product]] of the other $16$.
We obtain the [[Definition:Prime Decomposition|prime decomposition]] of all $17$ of these [[Definition:Integer|integers]]: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 2184 | r = 2^3 \times 3 \times 7 \times 13 }} {{eqn | l = 2185 | r = 5 \times 19 \times 23 }} {{eqn | l = 2186 | r = 2 \times 1093 }} {{eqn | l = 2187 ...
17 Consecutive Integers each with Common Factor with Product of other 16
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/17_Consecutive_Integers_each_with_Common_Factor_with_Product_of_other_16
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/17_Consecutive_Integers_each_with_Common_Factor_with_Product_of_other_16
[ "Recreational Mathematics" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Coprime/Integers", "Definition:Multiplication/Integers" ]
[ "Definition:Prime Decomposition", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Integer Sequence", "Definition:Prime Factor", "Definition:Integer Sequence" ]
proofwiki-13499
Relational Structure admits Lower Topology
Let $R = \left({S, \preceq}\right)$ be a relational structure. Then there exists a relational structure with lower topology $T = \left({S, \preceq, \tau}\right)$ such that $T$ is a topological space.
Define $B := \left\{ {\complement_S\left({x^\succeq}\right): x \in S}\right\}$ where $x^\succeq$ denotes the upper closure of $x$. By definition of generated topology: :$\tau\left({B}\right)$ is a topology on $S$ where $B$ is a sub-basis of $\tau \left({B}\right)$. Thus by definition of lower topology: :$T := \left({S,...
Let $R = \left({S, \preceq}\right)$ be a [[Definition:Relational Structure|relational structure]]. Then there exists a [[Definition:Relational Structure with Topology|relational structure]] with [[Definition:Lower Topology|lower topology]] $T = \left({S, \preceq, \tau}\right)$ such that $T$ is a [[Definition:Topologi...
Define $B := \left\{ {\complement_S\left({x^\succeq}\right): x \in S}\right\}$ where $x^\succeq$ denotes the [[Definition:Upper Closure of Element|upper closure]] of $x$. By definition of [[Definition:Topology Generated by Synthetic Sub-Basis|generated topology]]: :$\tau\left({B}\right)$ is a [[Definition:Topology|to...
Relational Structure admits Lower Topology
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Relational_Structure_admits_Lower_Topology
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Relational_Structure_admits_Lower_Topology
[ "Topological Order Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Relational Structure", "Definition:Relational Structure with Topology", "Definition:Lower Topology", "Definition:Topological Space" ]
[ "Definition:Upper Closure/Element", "Definition:Topology Generated by Synthetic Sub-Basis", "Definition:Topology", "Definition:Sub-Basis/Synthetic Sub-Basis", "Definition:Lower Topology", "Definition:Lower Topology", "Definition:Topological Space" ]