id
stringlengths
11
15
title
stringlengths
7
171
problem
stringlengths
9
4.33k
solution
stringlengths
6
19k
problem_wikitext
stringlengths
9
4.42k
solution_wikitext
stringlengths
7
19.1k
proof_title
stringlengths
9
171
theorem_url
stringlengths
34
198
proof_url
stringlengths
36
198
categories
listlengths
0
9
theorem_references
listlengths
0
36
proof_references
listlengths
0
253
proofwiki-13600
Factors of Sums of Powers of 100,000
All integers $n$ of the form: :$n = \ds \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^m 10^{5 k}$ for $m \in \Z_{> 0}$ are composite.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^1 10^{5 k} | r = 100 \, 001 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 11 \times 9091 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^2 10^{5 k} | r = 10 \, 000 \, 100 \, 001 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 3 \times 31 \times 37 \times 2 \, 906 \, 161 ...
All [[Definition:Integer|integers]] $n$ of the form: :$n = \ds \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^m 10^{5 k}$ for $m \in \Z_{> 0}$ are [[Definition:Composite Number|composite]].
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^1 10^{5 k} | r = 100 \, 001 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 11 \times 9091 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^2 10^{5 k} | r = 10 \, 000 \, 100 \, 001 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 3 \times 31 \times 37 \times 2 \, 906 \, 161...
Factors of Sums of Powers of 100,000
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Factors_of_Sums_of_Powers_of_100,000
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Factors_of_Sums_of_Powers_of_100,000
[ "Composite Numbers", "Factors of Sums of Powers of 100,000" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Composite Number" ]
[ "Definition:Repunit", "Definition:Prime Number", "Divisors of Repunit with Composite Index", "Prime not Divisor implies Coprime", "Definition:Coprime/Integers", "Condition for Repunits to be Coprime", "Definition:Coprime/Integers", "Euclid's Lemma", "Divisors of Repunit with Composite Index" ]
proofwiki-13601
Numbers whose Cube equals Sum of Sequence of that many Squares
The integers $m$ in the following sequence all have the property that $m^3$ is equal to the sum of $m$ consecutive squares: :$m^3 = \ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^m \paren {n + k}^2$ for some $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$: :$0, 1, 47, 2161, 99 \, 359, 4 \, 568 \, 353, \ldots$
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | l = m^3 | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^m \paren {n + k}^2 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^m \paren {n^2 + 2 n k + k^2} | c = }} {{eqn | r = n^2 \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^m 1 + 2 n \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^m k + \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^m k^2 | c = }} {{e...
The [[Definition:Integer|integers]] $m$ in the following [[Definition:Integer Sequence|sequence]] all have the property that $m^3$ is equal to the [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of $m$ consecutive [[Definition:Square Number|squares]]: :$m^3 = \ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^m \paren {n + k}^2$ for some $n \in \Z_{\ge 0...
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | l = m^3 | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^m \paren {n + k}^2 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^m \paren {n^2 + 2 n k + k^2} | c = }} {{eqn | r = n^2 \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^m 1 + 2 n \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^m k + \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^m k^2 | c = }} {{...
Numbers whose Cube equals Sum of Sequence of that many Squares
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Numbers_whose_Cube_equals_Sum_of_Sequence_of_that_many_Squares
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Numbers_whose_Cube_equals_Sum_of_Sequence_of_that_many_Squares
[ "Numbers whose Cube equals Sum of Sequence of that many Squares", "Cube Numbers", "Square Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Integer Sequence", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Square Number" ]
[ "Closed Form for Triangular Numbers", "Sum of Sequence of Squares", "Definition:Quadratic Equation", "Solution to Quadratic Equation", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Rational Number", "Definition:Square Root", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Integ...
proofwiki-13602
Points Defined by Adjacent Pairs of Digits of Reciprocal of 7 lie on Ellipse
Consider the digits that form the recurring part of the reciprocal of $7$: :$\dfrac 1 7 = 0 \cdotp \dot 14285 \dot 7$ Take the digits in ordered pairs, and treat them as coordinates of a Cartesian plane. It will be found that they all lie on an ellipse: :400px
:400px Let the points be labelled to simplify: :$A := \tuple {1, 4}$ :$B := \tuple {2, 8}$ :$C := \tuple {4, 2}$ :$D := \tuple {8, 5}$ :$E := \tuple {7, 1}$ :$F := \tuple {5, 7}$ Let $ABCDEF$ be considered as a hexagon. We join the opposite points of $ABCDEF$: :$AF: \tuple {1, 4} \to \tuple {5, 7}$ :$BC: \tuple {2, 8} ...
Consider the [[Definition:Digit|digits]] that form the [[Definition:Recurring Part|recurring part]] of the [[Definition:Reciprocal|reciprocal]] of $7$: :$\dfrac 1 7 = 0 \cdotp \dot 14285 \dot 7$ Take the [[Definition:Digit|digits]] in [[Definition:Ordered Pair|ordered pairs]], and treat them as [[Definition:Coordinate...
:[[File:EllipseFromSeventhSolution.png|400px]] Let the points be labelled to simplify: :$A := \tuple {1, 4}$ :$B := \tuple {2, 8}$ :$C := \tuple {4, 2}$ :$D := \tuple {8, 5}$ :$E := \tuple {7, 1}$ :$F := \tuple {5, 7}$ Let $ABCDEF$ be considered as a [[Definition:Hexagon|hexagon]]. We join the opposite points of ...
Points Defined by Adjacent Pairs of Digits of Reciprocal of 7 lie on Ellipse
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Points_Defined_by_Adjacent_Pairs_of_Digits_of_Reciprocal_of_7_lie_on_Ellipse
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Points_Defined_by_Adjacent_Pairs_of_Digits_of_Reciprocal_of_7_lie_on_Ellipse
[ "Ellipses", "7" ]
[ "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Basis Expansion/Recurrence/Recurring Part", "Definition:Reciprocal", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Ordered Pair", "Definition:Coordinate", "Definition:Cartesian Plane", "Definition:Ellipse", "File:EllipseFromSeventh.png" ]
[ "File:EllipseFromSeventhSolution.png", "Definition:Hexagon", "Definition:Intersection (Geometry)", "Definition:Line/Straight Line", "Pascal's Mystic Hexagram", "Equation of Straight Line in Plane/Two-Point Form", "Definition:Intersection (Geometry)", "Definition:Intersection (Geometry)", "Definition...
proofwiki-13603
Continuous Function on Compact Subspace of Euclidean Space is Bounded
Let $\R^n$ be the $n$-dimensional Euclidean space. Let $S \subseteq \R^n$ be a compact subspace of $\R^n$. Let $f: S \to \R$ be a continuous function. Then $f$ is bounded in $\R$.
An application of Continuous Function on Compact Space is Bounded.
Let $\R^n$ be the [[Definition:Euclidean Space|$n$-dimensional Euclidean space]]. Let $S \subseteq \R^n$ be a [[Definition:Compact (Real Analysis)|compact subspace]] of $\R^n$. Let $f: S \to \R$ be a [[Definition:Continuous Mapping (Metric Spaces)|continuous function]]. Then $f$ is [[Definition:Bounded Mapping|boun...
An application of [[Continuous Function on Compact Space is Bounded]].
Continuous Function on Compact Subspace of Euclidean Space is Bounded
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Function_on_Compact_Subspace_of_Euclidean_Space_is_Bounded
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Function_on_Compact_Subspace_of_Euclidean_Space_is_Bounded
[ "Analysis", "Continuity" ]
[ "Definition:Euclidean Space", "Definition:Compact Space/Real Analysis", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Metric Space)", "Definition:Bounded Mapping" ]
[ "Continuous Function on Compact Space is Bounded" ]
proofwiki-13604
Points Defined by Adjacent Pairs of Digits of Reciprocal of 13 lie on Hyperbola
Consider the digits that form the recurring part of the reciprocal of $13$: :$\dfrac 1 {13} = 0 \cdotp \dot 07692 \dot 3$ Take the digits in ordered pairs, and treat them as coordinates of a Cartesian plane. It will be found that they all lie on a hyperbola: :600px
:600px Let the points be labelled to simplify: :$A := \left({0, 7}\right)$ :$B := \left({7, 6}\right)$ :$C := \left({6, 9}\right)$ :$D := \left({9, 2}\right)$ :$E := \left({2, 3}\right)$ :$F := \left({3, 0}\right)$ {{finish|Just too tedious to contemplate.}}
Consider the [[Definition:Digit|digits]] that form the [[Definition:Recurring Part|recurring part]] of the [[Definition:Reciprocal|reciprocal]] of $13$: :$\dfrac 1 {13} = 0 \cdotp \dot 07692 \dot 3$ Take the [[Definition:Digit|digits]] in [[Definition:Ordered Pair|ordered pairs]], and treat them as [[Definition:Coordi...
:[[File:HyperbolaFromThirteenthSolution.png|600px]] Let the points be labelled to simplify: :$A := \left({0, 7}\right)$ :$B := \left({7, 6}\right)$ :$C := \left({6, 9}\right)$ :$D := \left({9, 2}\right)$ :$E := \left({2, 3}\right)$ :$F := \left({3, 0}\right)$ {{finish|Just too tedious to contemplate.}}
Points Defined by Adjacent Pairs of Digits of Reciprocal of 13 lie on Hyperbola
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Points_Defined_by_Adjacent_Pairs_of_Digits_of_Reciprocal_of_13_lie_on_Hyperbola
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Points_Defined_by_Adjacent_Pairs_of_Digits_of_Reciprocal_of_13_lie_on_Hyperbola
[ "Hyperbolas", "13" ]
[ "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Basis Expansion/Recurrence/Recurring Part", "Definition:Reciprocal", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Ordered Pair", "Definition:Coordinate", "Definition:Cartesian Plane", "Definition:Hyperbola", "File:HyperbolaFromThirteenth.png" ]
[ "File:HyperbolaFromThirteenthSolution.png" ]
proofwiki-13605
Number times Recurring Part of Reciprocal gives 9-Repdigit
Let a (strictly) positive integer $n$ be such that the decimal expansion of its reciprocal has a recurring part of period $d$ and no non-recurring part. Let $m$ be the integer formed from the $d$ digits of the recurring part. Then $m \times n$ is a $d$-digit repdigit number consisting of $9$s.
Let $x = \dfrac 1 n = \sqbrk {0. mmmm \dots}$. Then: :$10^d x = \sqbrk {m.mmmm \dots}$ Therefore: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 10^d x - x | r = \sqbrk {m.mmmm \dots} - \sqbrk {0. mmmm \dots} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \frac 1 n \paren {10^d - 1} | r = m }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = m n | ...
Let a [[Definition:Strictly Positive Integer|(strictly) positive integer]] $n$ be such that the [[Definition:Decimal Expansion|decimal expansion]] of its [[Definition:Reciprocal|reciprocal]] has a [[Definition:Recurring Part|recurring part]] of [[Definition:Period of Recurrence|period]] $d$ and no [[Definition:Non-Recu...
Let $x = \dfrac 1 n = \sqbrk {0. mmmm \dots}$. Then: :$10^d x = \sqbrk {m.mmmm \dots}$ Therefore: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 10^d x - x | r = \sqbrk {m.mmmm \dots} - \sqbrk {0. mmmm \dots} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \frac 1 n \paren {10^d - 1} | r = m }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = m n ...
Number times Recurring Part of Reciprocal gives 9-Repdigit
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_times_Recurring_Part_of_Reciprocal_gives_9-Repdigit
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_times_Recurring_Part_of_Reciprocal_gives_9-Repdigit
[ "Number times Recurring Part of Reciprocal gives 9-Repdigit", "Repdigit Numbers", "Reciprocals" ]
[ "Definition:Strictly Positive/Integer", "Definition:Decimal Expansion", "Definition:Reciprocal", "Definition:Basis Expansion/Recurrence/Recurring Part", "Definition:Basis Expansion/Recurrence/Period", "Definition:Basis Expansion/Recurrence/Non-Recurring Part", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Digit",...
[ "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Repdigit Number" ]
proofwiki-13606
Reciprocal of 142,857
:$\dfrac 1 {142 \, 857} = 0 \cdotp \dot 00000 \, \dot 7$
Performing the calculation using long division: <pre> 0.000007000007... ------------------ 142857)1.000000000000... 1 000000 999999 -------- 1000000 999999 ------- </pre>
:$\dfrac 1 {142 \, 857} = 0 \cdotp \dot 00000 \, \dot 7$
Performing the calculation using [[Definition:Long Division|long division]]: <pre> 0.000007000007... ------------------ 142857)1.000000000000... 1 000000 999999 -------- 1000000 999999 ------- </pre>
Reciprocal of 142,857
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reciprocal_of_142,857
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reciprocal_of_142,857
[ "142,857", "Examples of Reciprocals" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Classical Algorithm/Division" ]
proofwiki-13607
Quotient of Group by Itself
Let $G$ be a group. Let $G / G$ be the quotient group of $G$ by itself. Then: :$G / G \cong \set e$ That is, the quotient of a group by itself is isomorphic to the trivial group.
Let the homomorphism $\phi: G \to \set e$ be defined as: :$\forall g \in G: \map \phi g = e$ Then: :$\map \ker \phi = G$ and: :$\Img \phi = \set e$ By the First Isomorphism Theorem: :$G / \map \ker \phi \cong \Img \phi$ Hence the result: :$G / G \cong \set e$ {{qed}}
Let $G$ be a [[Definition:Group|group]]. Let $G / G$ be the [[Definition:Quotient Group|quotient group]] of $G$ by itself. Then: :$G / G \cong \set e$ That is, the [[Definition:Quotient Group|quotient]] of a [[Definition:Group|group]] by itself is [[Definition:Group Isomorphism|isomorphic]] to the [[Definition:Triv...
Let the [[Definition:Group Homomorphism|homomorphism]] $\phi: G \to \set e$ be defined as: :$\forall g \in G: \map \phi g = e$ Then: :$\map \ker \phi = G$ and: :$\Img \phi = \set e$ By the [[First Isomorphism Theorem]]: :$G / \map \ker \phi \cong \Img \phi$ Hence the result: :$G / G \cong \set e$ {{qed}}
Quotient of Group by Itself
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quotient_of_Group_by_Itself
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quotient_of_Group_by_Itself
[ "Examples of Quotient Groups" ]
[ "Definition:Group", "Definition:Quotient Group", "Definition:Quotient Group", "Definition:Group", "Definition:Isomorphism (Abstract Algebra)/Group Isomorphism", "Definition:Trivial Group" ]
[ "Definition:Group Homomorphism", "First Isomorphism Theorem" ]
proofwiki-13608
Integer whose Digits when Grouped in 3s add to Multiple of 999 is Divisible by 999
Let $n$ be an integer which has at least $3$ digits when expressed in decimal notation. Let the digits of $n$ be divided into groups of $3$, counting from the right, and those groups added. Then the result is equal to a multiple of $999$ {{iff}} $n$ is divisible by $999$.
{{refactor|The below sentence should be on the mistake page. Need to go back to the source work to clarify what we have.|level = medium}} The mistake is either ''and conversely'' or ''equal to $999$'', since $999 \, 999$ is an easy counterexample. Here we will show that the result is equal to '''a multiple of''' $999$ ...
Let $n$ be an [[Definition:Integer|integer]] which has at least $3$ [[Definition:Digit|digits]] when expressed in [[Definition:Decimal Notation|decimal notation]]. Let the [[Definition:Digit|digits]] of $n$ be divided into groups of $3$, counting from the right, and those groups added. Then the result is equal to a ...
{{refactor|The below sentence should be on the mistake page. Need to go back to the source work to clarify what we have.|level = medium}} The mistake is either ''and conversely'' or ''equal to $999$'', since $999 \, 999$ is an easy counterexample. Here we will show that the result is equal to '''a multiple of''' $999...
Integer whose Digits when Grouped in 3s add to Multiple of 999 is Divisible by 999
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integer_whose_Digits_when_Grouped_in_3s_add_to_Multiple_of_999_is_Divisible_by_999
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integer_whose_Digits_when_Grouped_in_3s_add_to_Multiple_of_999_is_Divisible_by_999
[ "Recreational Mathematics", "Divisibility Tests", "Integer whose Digits when Grouped in 3s add to Multiple of 999 is Divisible by 999" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Decimal Notation", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Multiple/Integer", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer" ]
[ "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Digit", "Congruence of Powers" ]
proofwiki-13609
Number which is Sum of Subfactorials of Digits
The only integer which is the sum of the subfactorials of its digits is $148 \, 349$: :$148 \, 349 = \mathop !1 + \mathop !4 + \mathop !8 + \mathop !3 \mathop + \mathop !4 \mathop + \mathop !9$
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 148 \, 349 | r = 0 + 9 + 14 \, 833 + 2 + 9 + 133 \, 496 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \mathop !1 + \mathop !4 + \mathop !8 + \mathop !3 \mathop + \mathop !4 \mathop + \mathop !9 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} A computer search can verify solutions under $10^6$ (that is, with no more ...
The only [[Definition:Integer|integer]] which is the [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of the [[Definition:Subfactorial|subfactorials]] of its [[Definition:Digit|digits]] is $148 \, 349$: :$148 \, 349 = \mathop !1 + \mathop !4 + \mathop !8 + \mathop !3 \mathop + \mathop !4 \mathop + \mathop !9$
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 148 \, 349 | r = 0 + 9 + 14 \, 833 + 2 + 9 + 133 \, 496 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \mathop !1 + \mathop !4 + \mathop !8 + \mathop !3 \mathop + \mathop !4 \mathop + \mathop !9 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} A computer search can verify solutions under $10^6$ (that is, with no mo...
Number which is Sum of Subfactorials of Digits
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_which_is_Sum_of_Subfactorials_of_Digits
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_which_is_Sum_of_Subfactorials_of_Digits
[ "Subfactorials", "148,349" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Subfactorial", "Definition:Digit" ]
[ "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Subfactorial", "Definition:Digit", "Bernoulli's Inequality" ]
proofwiki-13610
Integers Representable as Product of both 3 and 4 Consecutive Integers
There are $3$ integers which can be expressed as both $x \paren {x + 1} \paren {x + 2} \paren {x + 3}$ for some $x$, and $y \paren {y + 1} \paren {y + 2}$ for some $y$: :$24, 120, 175 \, 560$
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 24 | r = 1 \times 2 \times 3 \times 4 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 2 \times 3 \times 4 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 120 | r = 2 \times 3 \times 4 \times 5 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 4 \times 5 \times 6 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eq...
There are $3$ [[Definition:Integer|integers]] which can be expressed as both $x \paren {x + 1} \paren {x + 2} \paren {x + 3}$ for some $x$, and $y \paren {y + 1} \paren {y + 2}$ for some $y$: :$24, 120, 175 \, 560$
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 24 | r = 1 \times 2 \times 3 \times 4 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 2 \times 3 \times 4 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 120 | r = 2 \times 3 \times 4 \times 5 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 4 \times 5 \times 6 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {...
Integers Representable as Product of both 3 and 4 Consecutive Integers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integers_Representable_as_Product_of_both_3_and_4_Consecutive_Integers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integers_Representable_as_Product_of_both_3_and_4_Consecutive_Integers
[ "Number Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Integer" ]
[]
proofwiki-13611
Squares whose Digits form Consecutive Increasing Integers
The sequence of integers whose squares have a decimal representation consisting of the concatenation of $2$ consecutive increasing integers begins: :$428, 573, 727, 846, 7810, 36 \, 365, 63 \, 636, 326 \, 734, \ldots$ {{OEIS|A030467}}
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 428^2 | r = 183 \, 184 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 573^2 | r = 328 \, 329 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 727^2 | r = 528 \, 529 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 846^2 | r = 715 \, 716 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 7810^2 | r = 6099 \, 6100 | c = }} {{eqn | l...
The [[Definition:Integer Sequence|sequence]] of [[Definition:Integer|integers]] whose [[Definition:Square (Algebra)|squares]] have a [[Definition:Decimal Notation|decimal representation]] consisting of the concatenation of $2$ consecutive increasing [[Definition:Integer|integers]] begins: :$428, 573, 727, 846, 7810, 36...
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 428^2 | r = 183 \, 184 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 573^2 | r = 328 \, 329 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 727^2 | r = 528 \, 529 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 846^2 | r = 715 \, 716 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 7810^2 | r = 6099 \, 6100 | c = }} {{eqn | ...
Squares whose Digits form Consecutive Increasing Integers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Squares_whose_Digits_form_Consecutive_Increasing_Integers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Squares_whose_Digits_form_Consecutive_Increasing_Integers
[ "Square Numbers", "Recreational Mathematics" ]
[ "Definition:Integer Sequence", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Square/Function", "Definition:Decimal Notation", "Definition:Integer" ]
[]
proofwiki-13612
Smallest Fifth Power which is Sum of 6 Fifth Powers
The smallest fifth power which is the sum of $6$ fifth powers is $12^5 = 248 \, 832$: :$12^5 = 4^5 + 5^5 + 6^5 + 7^5 + 9^5 + 11^5$
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 12^5 | r = 248 \, 832 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 1024 + 3125 + 7776 + 16 \, 807 + 59 \, 049 + 161 \, 051 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 4^5 + 5^5 + 6^5 + 7^5 + 9^5 + 11^5 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{ProofWanted|It remains to be shown that this is the smallest.}}
The smallest [[Definition:Fifth Power|fifth power]] which is the [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of $6$ [[Definition:Fifth Power|fifth powers]] is $12^5 = 248 \, 832$: :$12^5 = 4^5 + 5^5 + 6^5 + 7^5 + 9^5 + 11^5$
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 12^5 | r = 248 \, 832 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 1024 + 3125 + 7776 + 16 \, 807 + 59 \, 049 + 161 \, 051 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 4^5 + 5^5 + 6^5 + 7^5 + 9^5 + 11^5 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{ProofWanted|It remains to be shown that this is the smallest.}}
Smallest Fifth Power which is Sum of 6 Fifth Powers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smallest_Fifth_Power_which_is_Sum_of_6_Fifth_Powers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smallest_Fifth_Power_which_is_Sum_of_6_Fifth_Powers
[ "Fifth Powers" ]
[ "Definition:Fifth Power", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Fifth Power" ]
[]
proofwiki-13613
Prime Numbers Embedded in Digits of Pi
The sequence of prime numbers that can be found starting from the beginning of the decimal expansion of $\pi$ (pi) begins: :$3, 31, 314 \, 159, 31 \, 415 \, 926 \, 535 \, 897 \, 932 \, 384 \, 626 \, 433 \, 832 \, 795 \, 028 \, 841, \ldots$ {{OEIS|A005042}}
By inspection.
The [[Definition:Integer Sequence|sequence]] of [[Definition:Prime Number|prime numbers]] that can be found starting from the beginning of the [[Definition:Decimal Expansion|decimal expansion]] of [[Definition:Pi|$\pi$ (pi)]] begins: :$3, 31, 314 \, 159, 31 \, 415 \, 926 \, 535 \, 897 \, 932 \, 384 \, 626 \, 433 \, 832...
By inspection.
Prime Numbers Embedded in Digits of Pi
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Prime_Numbers_Embedded_in_Digits_of_Pi
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Prime_Numbers_Embedded_in_Digits_of_Pi
[ "Pi", "Prime Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Integer Sequence", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Decimal Expansion", "Definition:Pi" ]
[]
proofwiki-13614
333,667 is Unique Period Prime with Period 9
$333 \, 667$ is a unique period prime whose reciprocal has a period of $9$: :$\dfrac 1 {333 \, 667} = 0 \cdotp \dot 00000 \, 299 \dot 7$
By long division: <pre> 0.000002997000002... --------------------- 333667)1.000000000000000000 667334 -------- 3326660 3003003 ------- 3236570 3003003 ------- 2335670 2335669 ------- 1...
$333 \, 667$ is a [[Definition:Unique Period Prime|unique period prime]] whose [[Definition:Reciprocal|reciprocal]] has a [[Definition:Period of Recurrence|period]] of $9$: :$\dfrac 1 {333 \, 667} = 0 \cdotp \dot 00000 \, 299 \dot 7$
By [[Definition:Long Division|long division]]: <pre> 0.000002997000002... --------------------- 333667)1.000000000000000000 667334 -------- 3326660 3003003 ------- 3236570 3003003 ------- 2335670 2335669 ...
333,667 is Unique Period Prime with Period 9
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/333,667_is_Unique_Period_Prime_with_Period_9
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/333,667_is_Unique_Period_Prime_with_Period_9
[ "333,667", "Examples of Unique Period Primes" ]
[ "Definition:Unique Period Prime", "Definition:Reciprocal", "Definition:Basis Expansion/Recurrence/Period" ]
[ "Definition:Classical Algorithm/Division", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Reciprocal", "Definition:Basis Expansion/Recurrence/Period", "Period of Reciprocal of Prime", "Definition:Basis Expansion/Recurrence/Period", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Multiplicative Order of Integer", "De...
proofwiki-13615
Cube which can be Represented as Sum of 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 or 8 Cubes
:$351 \, 120^3$ can be represented as the sum of $3$, $4$, $5$, $6$, $7$ or $8$ cubes.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 351120^3 | r = 175560^3 + 234080^3 + 292600^3 }} {{eqn | r = 2 \times 87780^3 + 204820^3 + 321860^3 }} {{eqn | r = 2 \times 87780^3 + 175560^3 + 2 \times 263340^3 }} {{eqn | r = 3 \times 117040^3 + 3 \times 234080^3 }} {{eqn | r = 2 \times 58520^3 + 117040^3 + 3 \times 175560^3 + 292600^...
:$351 \, 120^3$ can be represented as the [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of $3$, $4$, $5$, $6$, $7$ or $8$ [[Definition:Cube Number|cubes]].
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 351120^3 | r = 175560^3 + 234080^3 + 292600^3 }} {{eqn | r = 2 \times 87780^3 + 204820^3 + 321860^3 }} {{eqn | r = 2 \times 87780^3 + 175560^3 + 2 \times 263340^3 }} {{eqn | r = 3 \times 117040^3 + 3 \times 234080^3 }} {{eqn | r = 2 \times 58520^3 + 117040^3 + 3 \times 175560^3 + 292600^...
Cube which can be Represented as Sum of 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 or 8 Cubes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cube_which_can_be_Represented_as_Sum_of_3,_4,_5,_6,_7_or_8_Cubes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cube_which_can_be_Represented_as_Sum_of_3,_4,_5,_6,_7_or_8_Cubes
[ "Cube Numbers", "351,120" ]
[ "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Cube Number" ]
[]
proofwiki-13616
Prime Gaps of 100
The following pairs of consecutive prime numbers are those whose difference is $100$: :$\tuple {396 \, 733, 396 \, 833}, \ldots$ {{expand|Only know the first pair so far. Research needed to find the next one(s).}}
Demonstrated by listing the prime gaps. {{qed}}
The following [[Definition:Ordered Pair|pairs]] of consecutive [[Definition:Prime Number|prime numbers]] are those whose [[Definition:Integer Subtraction|difference]] is $100$: :$\tuple {396 \, 733, 396 \, 833}, \ldots$ {{expand|Only know the first pair so far. Research needed to find the next one(s).}}
Demonstrated by listing the [[Definition:Prime Gap|prime gaps]]. {{qed}}
Prime Gaps of 100
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Prime_Gaps_of_100
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Prime_Gaps_of_100
[ "Prime Gaps" ]
[ "Definition:Ordered Pair", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Subtraction/Integers" ]
[ "Definition:Prime Gap" ]
proofwiki-13617
Property of 490,689
The number $490 \, 689$ can be expressed as the sum of $3$ cubes in $2$ different ways: :$490 \, 689 = 4^3 + 60^3 + 65^3 = 8^3 + 25^3 \times 78^3$ while at the same time the products of the contributory cube roots of each of those $2$ ways are equal: :$4 \times 60 \times 65 = 8 \times 25 \times 78$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 490 \, 689 | r = 64 + 216 \, 000 + 274 \, 625 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 4^3 + 60^3 + 65^3 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 490 \, 689 | r = 512 + 15 \, 625 + 474 \, 552 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 8^3 + 25^3 + 78^3 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} Then: {{begin-eq...
The number $490 \, 689$ can be expressed as the [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of $3$ [[Definition:Cube Number|cubes]] in $2$ different ways: :$490 \, 689 = 4^3 + 60^3 + 65^3 = 8^3 + 25^3 \times 78^3$ while at the same time the [[Definition:Integer Multiplication|products]] of the contributory [[Definition:Cube R...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 490 \, 689 | r = 64 + 216 \, 000 + 274 \, 625 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 4^3 + 60^3 + 65^3 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 490 \, 689 | r = 512 + 15 \, 625 + 474 \, 552 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 8^3 + 25^3 + 78^3 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} Then: {{begin...
Property of 490,689
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Property_of_490,689
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Property_of_490,689
[ "Cube Numbers", "490,689" ]
[ "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Cube Number", "Definition:Multiplication/Integers", "Definition:Cube Root" ]
[]
proofwiki-13618
510,510 is Product of 4 Consecutive Fibonacci Numbers
$510 \, 510$ can be expressed as the product of $4$ distinct consecutive Fibonacci numbers: :$510 \, 510 = 13 \times 21 \times 34 \times 55$ and is also the $7$th primorial: :$510 \, 510 = 2 \times 3 \times 5 \times 7 \times 11 \times 13 \times 17$
By observation: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 510 \, 510 | r = 13 \times 21 \times 34 \times 55 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 13 \times \paren {3 \times 7} \times \paren {2 \times 17} \times \paren {5 \times 11} | c = }} {{eqn | r = 2 \times 3 \times 5 \times 7 \times 11 \times 13 \times 17 | c = }} {{end...
$510 \, 510$ can be expressed as the [[Definition:Integer Multiplication|product]] of $4$ [[Definition:Distinct|distinct]] consecutive [[Definition:Fibonacci Number|Fibonacci numbers]]: :$510 \, 510 = 13 \times 21 \times 34 \times 55$ and is also the $7$th [[Definition:Primorial|primorial]]: :$510 \, 510 = 2 \times 3 \...
By observation: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 510 \, 510 | r = 13 \times 21 \times 34 \times 55 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 13 \times \paren {3 \times 7} \times \paren {2 \times 17} \times \paren {5 \times 11} | c = }} {{eqn | r = 2 \times 3 \times 5 \times 7 \times 11 \times 13 \times 17 | c = }} {{en...
510,510 is Product of 4 Consecutive Fibonacci Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/510,510_is_Product_of_4_Consecutive_Fibonacci_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/510,510_is_Product_of_4_Consecutive_Fibonacci_Numbers
[ "Fibonacci Numbers", "Primorials", "510,510" ]
[ "Definition:Multiplication/Integers", "Definition:Distinct", "Definition:Fibonacci Number", "Definition:Primorial" ]
[]
proofwiki-13619
Tableau Confutation contains Finite Tableau Confutation
Let $\mathbf H$ be a countable set of WFFs of propositional logic. Let $T$ be a tableau confutation of $\mathbf H$. Then there exists a finite rooted subtree of $T'$ that is also a tableau confutation of $\mathbf H'$.
For each node $v \in T$, let $\map p v$ be the path from $v$ to $r_T$, the root of $T$. This path is unique by Path in Tree is Unique. Let $\VV$ be the subtree of $T$ consisting those nodes $v$ of $T$ such that $\map p v$ is not contradictory. {{AimForCont}} that $\VV$ were infinite. Then by König's Tree Lemma, $\VV$ h...
Let $\mathbf H$ be a [[Definition:Countable Set|countable set]] of [[Definition:WFF of Propositional Logic|WFFs of propositional logic]]. Let $T$ be a [[Definition:Tableau Confutation|tableau confutation]] of $\mathbf H$. Then there exists a [[Definition:Finite Tree|finite]] [[Definition:Rooted Subtree|rooted subtre...
For each [[Definition:Node of Tree|node]] $v \in T$, let $\map p v$ be the [[Definition:Path (Graph Theory)|path]] from $v$ to $r_T$, the [[Definition:Root Node|root]] of $T$. This [[Definition:Path (Graph Theory)|path]] is unique by [[Path in Tree is Unique]]. Let $\VV$ be the [[Definition:Rooted Subtree|subtree]] ...
Tableau Confutation contains Finite Tableau Confutation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Tableau_Confutation_contains_Finite_Tableau_Confutation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Tableau_Confutation_contains_Finite_Tableau_Confutation
[ "Propositional Tableaux" ]
[ "Definition:Countable Set", "Definition:Language of Propositional Logic/Formal Grammar/WFF", "Definition:Tableau Confutation", "Definition:Tree (Graph Theory)/Finite", "Definition:Rooted Subtree", "Definition:Tableau Confutation" ]
[ "Definition:Tree (Graph Theory)/Node", "Definition:Path (Graph Theory)", "Definition:Rooted Tree/Root Node", "Definition:Path (Graph Theory)", "Path in Tree is Unique", "Definition:Rooted Subtree", "Definition:Tree (Graph Theory)/Node", "Definition:Contradictory/Branch", "Definition:Infinite Set", ...
proofwiki-13620
Two-Sided Prime/Sequence
The complete sequence of two-sided primes is: :$2, 3, 5, 7, 23, 37, 53, 73, 313, 317, 373, 797, 3137, 3797, 739 \, 397$
{{ProofWanted}} Category:Two-Sided Primes ct1xp4yykscy4hdf7tndy9q4udrwcmo
The complete [[Definition:Integer Sequence|sequence]] of [[Definition:Two-Sided Prime|two-sided primes]] is: :$2, 3, 5, 7, 23, 37, 53, 73, 313, 317, 373, 797, 3137, 3797, 739 \, 397$
{{ProofWanted}} [[Category:Two-Sided Primes]] ct1xp4yykscy4hdf7tndy9q4udrwcmo
Two-Sided Prime/Sequence
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Two-Sided_Prime/Sequence
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Two-Sided_Prime/Sequence
[ "Two-Sided Primes" ]
[ "Definition:Integer Sequence", "Definition:Two-Sided Prime" ]
[ "Category:Two-Sided Primes" ]
proofwiki-13621
Set of 7 Anagrams which are Square
The following integers are all anagrams, and all square: :$1 \, 048 \, 576, 1 \, 056 \, 784, 1 \, 085 \, 764, 5 \, 740 \, 816, 5 \, 764 \, 801, 6 \, 754 \, 801, 7 \, 845 \, 601$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1 \, 048 \, 576 | r = 1024^2 }} {{eqn | l = 1 \, 056 \, 784 | r = 1028^2 }} {{eqn | l = 1 \, 085 \, 764 | r = 1042^2 }} {{eqn | l = 5 \, 740 \, 816 | r = 2396^2 }} {{eqn | l = 5 \, 764 \, 801 | r = 2401^2 }} {{eqn | l = 6 \, 754 \, 801 | r = 2599^2 }} {{eqn ...
The following [[Definition:Integer|integers]] are all [[Definition:Anagram|anagrams]], and all [[Definition:Square Number|square]]: :$1 \, 048 \, 576, 1 \, 056 \, 784, 1 \, 085 \, 764, 5 \, 740 \, 816, 5 \, 764 \, 801, 6 \, 754 \, 801, 7 \, 845 \, 601$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1 \, 048 \, 576 | r = 1024^2 }} {{eqn | l = 1 \, 056 \, 784 | r = 1028^2 }} {{eqn | l = 1 \, 085 \, 764 | r = 1042^2 }} {{eqn | l = 5 \, 740 \, 816 | r = 2396^2 }} {{eqn | l = 5 \, 764 \, 801 | r = 2401^2 }} {{eqn | l = 6 \, 754 \, 801 | r = 2599^2 }} {{eqn ...
Set of 7 Anagrams which are Square
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_of_7_Anagrams_which_are_Square
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_of_7_Anagrams_which_are_Square
[ "Square Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Anagram", "Definition:Square Number" ]
[]
proofwiki-13622
Burnside's Lemma
Let $G$ be a finite group acting on a set $X$. Let $X / G$ be the set of orbits under this action. For $x \in X$, let $\Stab x$ be the stabilizer of $x$ by $G$. For $g \in G$, let $X^g$ denotes the set of all elements of $X$ which are fixed by $g$: :$X^g := \set {x \in X: g x = x}$ Then: :$\size {X / G} = \dfrac 1 {\or...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \frac 1 {\order G} \sum_{g \mathop \in G} \size {X^g} | r = \frac 1 {\order G} \sum_{g \mathop \in G} \size {\set {x \in X: g x = x} } | c = by definition }} {{eqn | r = \frac 1 {\order G} \sum_{x \mathop \in X} \size {\set {g \in G: g x = x} } | c = Same summation, different...
Let $G$ be a [[Definition:Finite Group|finite group]] [[Definition:Group Action|acting]] on a [[Definition:Set|set]] $X$. Let $X / G$ be the [[Definition:Set of Orbits|set of orbits]] under this action. For $x \in X$, let $\Stab x$ be the [[Definition:Stabilizer|stabilizer]] of $x$ by $G$. For $g \in G$, let $X^g$ d...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \frac 1 {\order G} \sum_{g \mathop \in G} \size {X^g} | r = \frac 1 {\order G} \sum_{g \mathop \in G} \size {\set {x \in X: g x = x} } | c = by definition }} {{eqn | r = \frac 1 {\order G} \sum_{x \mathop \in X} \size {\set {g \in G: g x = x} } | c = Same summation, different...
Burnside's Lemma
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Burnside's_Lemma
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Burnside's_Lemma
[ "Burnside's Lemma", "Group Actions" ]
[ "Definition:Finite Group", "Definition:Group Action", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Orbit (Group Theory)/Set of Orbits", "Definition:Stabilizer", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Fixed Element", "Definition:Orbit (Group Theory)", "Definition:Fixed Point" ]
[ "Orbit-Stabilizer Theorem" ]
proofwiki-13623
Smallest Cunningham Chain of the First Kind of Length 7
The smallest Cunningham chain of the first kind of length $7$ is: :$\left({1 \, 122 \, 659, 2 \, 245 \, 319, 4 \, 490 \, 639, 8 \, 981 \, 279, 17 \, 962 \, 559, 35 \, 925 \, 119, 71 \, 850 \, 239}\right)$
Let $C$ denote the sequence in question. We have that: :$\dfrac {1 \, 122 \, 659 - 1} 2 = 561 \, 329 = 83 \times 6763$ and so is not prime. Thus $1 \, 122 \, 659$ is not a safe prime, as is required for $C$ to be a Cunningham chain of the first kind. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 2 \times 561 \, 329 + 1 | r = 1...
The smallest [[Definition:Cunningham Chain of the First Kind|Cunningham chain of the first kind]] of [[Definition:Length of Sequence|length]] $7$ is: :$\left({1 \, 122 \, 659, 2 \, 245 \, 319, 4 \, 490 \, 639, 8 \, 981 \, 279, 17 \, 962 \, 559, 35 \, 925 \, 119, 71 \, 850 \, 239}\right)$
Let $C$ denote the [[Definition:Sequence|sequence]] in question. We have that: :$\dfrac {1 \, 122 \, 659 - 1} 2 = 561 \, 329 = 83 \times 6763$ and so is not [[Definition:Prime Number|prime]]. Thus $1 \, 122 \, 659$ is not a [[Definition:Safe Prime|safe prime]], as is required for $C$ to be a [[Definition:Cunningham C...
Smallest Cunningham Chain of the First Kind of Length 7
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smallest_Cunningham_Chain_of_the_First_Kind_of_Length_7
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smallest_Cunningham_Chain_of_the_First_Kind_of_Length_7
[ "Cunningham Chains" ]
[ "Definition:Cunningham Chain/First Kind", "Definition:Length of Sequence" ]
[ "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Safe Prime", "Definition:Cunningham Chain/First Kind", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime...
proofwiki-13624
Square of Repunit times Sum of Digits
The following pattern emerges: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 121 \times \paren {1 + 2 + 1} | r = 22^2 }} {{eqn | l = 12 \, 321 \times \paren {1 + 2 + 3 + 2 + 1} | r = 333^2 }} {{eqn | l = 1 \, 234 \, 321 \times \paren {1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 3 + 2 + 1} | r = 4444^2 }} {{end-eqn}} and so on, up until $999 \, 999 ...
From Square of Repunit: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 121 | r = 11^2 }} {{eqn | l = 12 \, 321 | r = 111^2 }} {{eqn | l = 1 \, 234 \, 321 | r = 1111^2 }} {{end-eqn}} and so on. Then from 1+2+...+n+(n-1)+...+1 = n^2: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1 + 2 + 1 | r = 2^2 }} {{eqn | l = 1 + 2 + 3 + 2 + 1 ...
The following pattern emerges: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 121 \times \paren {1 + 2 + 1} | r = 22^2 }} {{eqn | l = 12 \, 321 \times \paren {1 + 2 + 3 + 2 + 1} | r = 333^2 }} {{eqn | l = 1 \, 234 \, 321 \times \paren {1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 3 + 2 + 1} | r = 4444^2 }} {{end-eqn}} and so on, up until $999 \, 99...
From [[Square of Repunit]]: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 121 | r = 11^2 }} {{eqn | l = 12 \, 321 | r = 111^2 }} {{eqn | l = 1 \, 234 \, 321 | r = 1111^2 }} {{end-eqn}} and so on. Then from [[1+2+...+n+(n-1)+...+1 = n^2]]: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1 + 2 + 1 | r = 2^2 }} {{eqn | l = 1 + 2 + 3 + 2...
Square of Repunit times Sum of Digits
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Square_of_Repunit_times_Sum_of_Digits
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Square_of_Repunit_times_Sum_of_Digits
[ "Repunits", "Square Numbers" ]
[]
[ "Square of Repunit", "1+2+...+n+(n-1)+...+1 = n^2" ]
proofwiki-13625
Factorisation of Quintic x^5 - x + n into Irreducible Quadratic and Irreducible Cubic
The quintic $x^5 - x + n$ can be factorized into the product of an irreducible quadratic and an an irreducible cubic {{iff}} $n$ is in the set: :$\set {\pm 15, \pm 22 \, 440, \pm 2 \, 759 \, 640}$
We have that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x^5 - x \pm 15 | r = \paren {x^2 \pm x + 3} \paren {x^3 \mp x^2 \mp 2 x \pm 5} }} {{eqn | l = x^5 - x \pm 22440 | r = \paren {x^2 \mp 12 x + 55} \paren {x^3 \pm 12 x^2 + 89 x \pm 408} }} {{eqn | l = x^5 - x \pm 2 \, 759 \, 640 | r = \paren {x^2 \pm 12 x + 377} \...
The [[Definition:Quintic Polynomial|quintic]] $x^5 - x + n$ can be [[Definition:Factorization|factorized]] into the [[Definition:Product of Polynomials|product]] of an [[Definition:Irreducible Polynomial|irreducible]] [[Definition:Quadratic Polynomial|quadratic]] and an an [[Definition:Irreducible Polynomial|irreducibl...
We have that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x^5 - x \pm 15 | r = \paren {x^2 \pm x + 3} \paren {x^3 \mp x^2 \mp 2 x \pm 5} }} {{eqn | l = x^5 - x \pm 22440 | r = \paren {x^2 \mp 12 x + 55} \paren {x^3 \pm 12 x^2 + 89 x \pm 408} }} {{eqn | l = x^5 - x \pm 2 \, 759 \, 640 | r = \paren {x^2 \pm 12 x + 377} \...
Factorisation of Quintic x^5 - x + n into Irreducible Quadratic and Irreducible Cubic
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Factorisation_of_Quintic_x^5_-_x_+_n_into_Irreducible_Quadratic_and_Irreducible_Cubic
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Factorisation_of_Quintic_x^5_-_x_+_n_into_Irreducible_Quadratic_and_Irreducible_Cubic
[ "Polynomial Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Quintic Polynomial", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Factorization", "Definition:Multiplication of Polynomials", "Definition:Irreducible Polynomial", "Definition:Quadratic Polynomial", "Definition:Irreducible Polynomial", "Definition:Cubic Polynomial" ]
[]
proofwiki-13626
Factorial as Product of Consecutive Factorials
The only factorials which are the product of consecutive factorials are: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 0! | r = 0! \times 1! | c = }} {{eqn | l = 1! | r = 0! \times 1! | c = }} {{eqn | l = 2! | r = 1! \times 2! | c = }} {{eqn | r = 0! \times 1! \times 2! | c = }} {{eqn | l = 10...
Suppose $m, n \in \N$ and $m > n$. Write $\map F {n, m} = n! \paren {n + 1}! \cdots m!$. Suppose we have $\map F {n, m} > r!$ for some $r \in \N$. Suppose further that there is a prime $p$ where $m < p \le r$. We claim that $\map F {n, m}$ cannot be a factorial of any number. {{AimForCont}} $\map F {n, m} = s!$ for som...
The only [[Definition:Factorial|factorials]] which are the product of consecutive [[Definition:Factorial|factorials]] are: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 0! | r = 0! \times 1! | c = }} {{eqn | l = 1! | r = 0! \times 1! | c = }} {{eqn | l = 2! | r = 1! \times 2! | c = }} {{eqn | r = 0!...
Suppose $m, n \in \N$ and $m > n$. Write $\map F {n, m} = n! \paren {n + 1}! \cdots m!$. Suppose we have $\map F {n, m} > r!$ for some $r \in \N$. Suppose further that there is a [[Definition:Prime Number|prime]] $p$ where $m < p \le r$. We claim that $\map F {n, m}$ cannot be a [[Definition:Factorial|factorial]] ...
Factorial as Product of Consecutive Factorials
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Factorial_as_Product_of_Consecutive_Factorials
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Factorial_as_Product_of_Consecutive_Factorials
[ "Factorials", "Factorial as Product of Consecutive Factorials" ]
[ "Definition:Factorial", "Definition:Factorial" ]
[ "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Factorial", "Definition:Factorial", "Definition:Lemma", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Factorial", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Factorial", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Fact...
proofwiki-13627
Numbers whose Fourth Root equals Number of Divisors
There are $4$ positive integers whose $4$th root equals the number of its divisors: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1 | r = 1^4 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 625 | r = 5^4 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 6561 | r = 9^4 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 4 \, 100 \, 625 | r = 45^4 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{OEIS...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\sigma_0} 1 | r = 1 | c = {{DCFLink|1}} }} {{eqn | l = \map {\sigma_0} {625} | r = 5 | c = {{DCFLink|625}} }} {{eqn | l = \map {\sigma_0} {6561} | r = 9 | c = {{DCFLink|6561}} }} {{eqn | l = \map {\sigma_0} {4 \, 100 \, 625} | r = 45 | c = ...
There are $4$ [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integers]] whose [[Definition:Root of Number|$4$th root]] equals the number of its [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divisors]]: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1 | r = 1^4 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 625 | r = 5^4 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 6561 | r = 9^...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\sigma_0} 1 | r = 1 | c = {{DCFLink|1}} }} {{eqn | l = \map {\sigma_0} {625} | r = 5 | c = {{DCFLink|625}} }} {{eqn | l = \map {\sigma_0} {6561} | r = 9 | c = {{DCFLink|6561}} }} {{eqn | l = \map {\sigma_0} {4 \, 100 \, 625} | r = 45 | c = ...
Numbers whose Fourth Root equals Number of Divisors
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Numbers_whose_Fourth_Root_equals_Number_of_Divisors
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Numbers_whose_Fourth_Root_equals_Number_of_Divisors
[ "Fourth Powers", "Divisor Count Function" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Root of Number", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer" ]
[ "Divisor Count Function is Odd Iff Argument is Square", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Prime Power", "Divisor Count Function of Power of Prime", "Bernoulli's Inequality", "Definition:Odd Prime", "Definition:Prime Power", "Divisor Count Function is Multiplicative", "Definition:Integer", "Def...
proofwiki-13628
Weak Existence of Matrix Logarithm
Let $T$ be a square matrix of order $n$. Let $\norm {T - I} < 1$ in the norm on bounded linear operators, where $I$ the identity matrix. Then there is a square matrix $S$ such that: :$e^S = T$ where $e^S$ is the matrix exponential.
Define: :$\ds S = \sum_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty \frac {\paren {-1}^{n - 1} } n \paren {T - I}^n$ $S$ converges since $\norm {T - I} < 1$. We have that $\ds \sum_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty \frac {\paren {-1}^{n - 1} } n \norm {T - I}^n$ is the Newton-Mercator Series. This converges since $\norm {T - I} < 1$. Hence the series ...
Let $T$ be a [[Definition:Square Matrix|square matrix]] of [[Definition:Order of Square Matrix|order $n$]]. Let $\norm {T - I} < 1$ in the [[Definition:Norm on Bounded Linear Transformation|norm on bounded linear operators]], where $I$ the [[Definition:Identity Matrix|identity matrix]]. Then there is a [[Definition:...
Define: :$\ds S = \sum_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty \frac {\paren {-1}^{n - 1} } n \paren {T - I}^n$ $S$ converges since $\norm {T - I} < 1$. We have that $\ds \sum_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty \frac {\paren {-1}^{n - 1} } n \norm {T - I}^n$ is the [[Definition:Newton-Mercator Series|Newton-Mercator Series]]. This converges si...
Weak Existence of Matrix Logarithm
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Weak_Existence_of_Matrix_Logarithm
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Weak_Existence_of_Matrix_Logarithm
[ "Matrix Algebra", "Matrix Logarithms" ]
[ "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix", "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix/Order", "Definition:Norm/Bounded Linear Transformation", "Definition:Unit Matrix", "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix", "Definition:Matrix Exponential" ]
[ "Definition:Newton-Mercator Series", "Properties of Matrix Exponential", "Definition:Newton-Mercator Series", "Power Series Expansion for Exponential Function" ]
proofwiki-13629
Norm on Vector Space is Continuous Function
Let $V$ be a vector space with norm $\norm {\, \cdot \,}$. The function $\norm {\, \cdot \,}: V \to \R$ is continuous.
Let $x_n \to x$ in $V$. Then we have: :$\norm {x_n - x} \to 0$ By the Reverse Triangle Inequality: :$\size {\norm {x_n} - \norm x} \le \norm {x_n - x}$ Hence: :$\size {\norm {x_n} - \norm x} \to 0$ Thus: :$\norm {x_n} \to \norm x$ Hence the result from the definition of a continuous real function. {{qed}} Category:Norm...
Let $V$ be a vector space with norm $\norm {\, \cdot \,}$. The function $\norm {\, \cdot \,}: V \to \R$ is continuous.
Let $x_n \to x$ in $V$. Then we have: :$\norm {x_n - x} \to 0$ By the [[Reverse Triangle Inequality]]: :$\size {\norm {x_n} - \norm x} \le \norm {x_n - x}$ Hence: :$\size {\norm {x_n} - \norm x} \to 0$ Thus: :$\norm {x_n} \to \norm x$ Hence the result from the definition of a [[Definition:Continuous Real Function ...
Norm on Vector Space is Continuous Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Norm_on_Vector_Space_is_Continuous_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Norm_on_Vector_Space_is_Continuous_Function
[ "Norm Theory" ]
[]
[ "Reverse Triangle Inequality", "Definition:Continuous Real Function/Point", "Category:Norm Theory" ]
proofwiki-13630
Smallest 5 Consecutive Primes in Arithmetic Sequence
The smallest $5$ consecutive primes in arithmetic sequence are: :$9 \, 843 \, 019 + 30 n$ for $n = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4$. Note that while there are many longer arithmetic sequences of far smaller primes, those primes are not consecutive.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 9 \, 843 \, 019 + 0 \times 30 | r = 9 \, 843 \, 019 | c = which is the $654 \, 926$th prime }} {{eqn | l = 9 \, 843 \, 019 + 1 \times 30 | r = 9 \, 843 \, 049 | c = which is the $654 \, 927$th prime }} {{eqn | l = 9 \, 843 \, 019 + 2 \times 30 | r = 9 \, 843 \, 07...
The smallest $5$ consecutive [[Definition:Prime Number|primes]] in [[Definition:Arithmetic Sequence|arithmetic sequence]] are: :$9 \, 843 \, 019 + 30 n$ for $n = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4$. Note that while there are many longer [[Definition:Arithmetic Sequence|arithmetic sequences]] of far smaller [[Definition:Prime Number|prime...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 9 \, 843 \, 019 + 0 \times 30 | r = 9 \, 843 \, 019 | c = which is the $654 \, 926$th [[Definition:Prime Number|prime]] }} {{eqn | l = 9 \, 843 \, 019 + 1 \times 30 | r = 9 \, 843 \, 049 | c = which is the $654 \, 927$th [[Definition:Prime Number|prime]] }} {{eqn | l = ...
Smallest 5 Consecutive Primes in Arithmetic Sequence
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smallest_5_Consecutive_Primes_in_Arithmetic_Sequence
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smallest_5_Consecutive_Primes_in_Arithmetic_Sequence
[ "Prime Numbers", "Arithmetic Sequences" ]
[ "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Arithmetic Sequence", "Definition:Arithmetic Sequence", "Definition:Prime Number" ]
[ "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number" ]
proofwiki-13631
Number of Ways to Tile Standard Chessboard with Dominoes
The number of ways to tile a standard ($8 \times 8$) chessboard with dominoes is $12 \, 988 \, 816$.
Follows directly from Kasteleyn's Formula for $m = n = 8$: :$\ds \prod_{j \mathop = 1}^{\ceiling {\frac 8 2} } \prod_{k \mathop = 1}^{\ceiling {\frac 8 2} } \paren {4 \cos^2 \frac {\pi j} {8 + 1} + 4 \cos^2 \frac {\pi k} {8 + 1} } = 12 \, 988 \, 816$ {{qed}} {{explain|The above really needs to be evaluated step by step...
The number of ways to [[Definition:Chessboard Tiling|tile]] a [[Definition:Chessboard|standard ($8 \times 8$) chessboard]] with [[Definition:Domino|dominoes]] is $12 \, 988 \, 816$.
Follows directly from [[Kasteleyn's Formula]] for $m = n = 8$: :$\ds \prod_{j \mathop = 1}^{\ceiling {\frac 8 2} } \prod_{k \mathop = 1}^{\ceiling {\frac 8 2} } \paren {4 \cos^2 \frac {\pi j} {8 + 1} + 4 \cos^2 \frac {\pi k} {8 + 1} } = 12 \, 988 \, 816$ {{qed}} {{explain|The above really needs to be evaluated step b...
Number of Ways to Tile Standard Chessboard with Dominoes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_of_Ways_to_Tile_Standard_Chessboard_with_Dominoes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_of_Ways_to_Tile_Standard_Chessboard_with_Dominoes
[ "Chessboard Tilings", "Chessboard Puzzles", "Dominoes", "Recreational Mathematics" ]
[ "Definition:Chessboard Tiling", "Definition:Chess/Chessboard", "Definition:Domino" ]
[ "Kasteleyn's Formula" ]
proofwiki-13632
Smallest Triplet of Primitive Pythagorean Triangles with Same Area
The smallest set of $3$ primitive Pythagorean triangles which all have the same area are: :the $4485-5852-7373$ triangle :the $3059-8580-9109$ triangle :the $1380-19 \, 019-19 \, 069$ triangle. That area is $13 \, 123 \, 110$.
We have that: :the $4485-5852-7373$ triangle $T_1$ is Pythagorean :the $3059-8580-9109$ triangle $T_2$ is Pythagorean :the $1380-19 \, 019-19 \, 069$ triangle $T_3$ is Pythagorean. Then from Area of Triangle, their areas $A_1$, $A_2$ and $A_3$ respectively are given by: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = A_1 | r = \dfrac ...
The smallest [[Definition:Set|set of $3$]] [[Definition:Primitive Pythagorean Triangle|primitive Pythagorean triangles]] which all have the same [[Definition:Area|area]] are: :the [[Pythagorean Triangle/Examples/4485-5852-7373|$4485-5852-7373$ triangle]] :the [[Pythagorean Triangle/Examples/3059-8580-9109|$3059-8580-...
We have that: :the [[Pythagorean Triangle/Examples/4485-5852-7373|$4485-5852-7373$ triangle $T_1$ is Pythagorean]] :the [[Pythagorean Triangle/Examples/3059-8580-9109|$3059-8580-9109$ triangle $T_2$ is Pythagorean]] :the [[Pythagorean Triangle/Examples/1380-19,019-19,069|$1380-19 \, 019-19 \, 069$ triangle $T_3$ is Pyt...
Smallest Triplet of Primitive Pythagorean Triangles with Same Area
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smallest_Triplet_of_Primitive_Pythagorean_Triangles_with_Same_Area
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smallest_Triplet_of_Primitive_Pythagorean_Triangles_with_Same_Area
[ "Specific Numbers", "13,123,110" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Primitive Pythagorean Triangle", "Definition:Area", "Pythagorean Triangle/Examples/4485-5852-7373", "Pythagorean Triangle/Examples/3059-8580-9109", "Pythagorean Triangle/Examples/1380-19,019-19,069" ]
[ "Pythagorean Triangle/Examples/4485-5852-7373", "Pythagorean Triangle/Examples/3059-8580-9109", "Pythagorean Triangle/Examples/1380-19,019-19,069", "Area of Triangle", "Definition:Area" ]
proofwiki-13633
Smallest Even Integer whose Euler Phi Value is not the Euler Phi Value of an Odd Integer
The smallest even integer whose Euler $\phi$ value is shared by no odd integer is $33 \, 817 \, 088$.
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \phi {33 \, 817 \, 088} | r = 16 \, 842 \, 752 | c = {{EulerPhiLink|33,817,088|33 \, 817 \, 088}} }} {{eqn | r = 2^{16} \times 257 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} Consider the equation: :$(1): \quad \map \phi x = 2^{16} \times 257$ Let $p$ be an odd prime factor of $x$. T...
The smallest [[Definition:Even Integer|even integer]] whose [[Definition:Euler Phi Function|Euler $\phi$ value]] is shared by no [[Definition:Odd Integer|odd integer]] is $33 \, 817 \, 088$.
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \phi {33 \, 817 \, 088} | r = 16 \, 842 \, 752 | c = {{EulerPhiLink|33,817,088|33 \, 817 \, 088}} }} {{eqn | r = 2^{16} \times 257 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} Consider the equation: :$(1): \quad \map \phi x = 2^{16} \times 257$ Let $p$ be an [[Definition:Odd Intege...
Smallest Even Integer whose Euler Phi Value is not the Euler Phi Value of an Odd Integer
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smallest_Even_Integer_whose_Euler_Phi_Value_is_not_the_Euler_Phi_Value_of_an_Odd_Integer
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smallest_Even_Integer_whose_Euler_Phi_Value_is_not_the_Euler_Phi_Value_of_an_Odd_Integer
[ "33,817,088", "Euler Phi Function" ]
[ "Definition:Even Integer", "Definition:Euler Phi Function", "Definition:Odd Integer" ]
[ "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Prime Factor", "Euler Phi Function is Multiplicative", "Definition:Power (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Fermat Prime", "Definition:Composite Number", "Definition:Odd Integer", "De...
proofwiki-13634
Squares whose Digits form Consecutive Integers
The sequence of integers whose squares have a decimal representation consisting of the concatenation of $2$ consecutive integers, either increasing or decreasing begins: :$91, 428, 573, 727, 846, 7810, 9079, 9901, 36 \, 365, 63 \, 636, 326 \, 734, 673 \, 267, 733 \, 674, \ldots$ This sequence can be divided into two su...
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 91^2 | r = 8281 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 428^2 | r = 183 \, 184 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 573^2 | r = 328 \, 329 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 727^2 | r = 528 \, 529 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 846^2 | r = 715 \, 716 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 7810^2 ...
The [[Definition:Integer Sequence|sequence]] of [[Definition:Integer|integers]] whose [[Definition:Square (Algebra)|squares]] have a [[Definition:Decimal Notation|decimal representation]] consisting of the concatenation of $2$ consecutive [[Definition:Integer|integers]], either increasing or decreasing begins: :$91, 42...
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 91^2 | r = 8281 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 428^2 | r = 183 \, 184 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 573^2 | r = 328 \, 329 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 727^2 | r = 528 \, 529 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 846^2 | r = 715 \, 716 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 7810^2...
Squares whose Digits form Consecutive Integers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Squares_whose_Digits_form_Consecutive_Integers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Squares_whose_Digits_form_Consecutive_Integers
[ "Square Numbers", "Recreational Mathematics" ]
[ "Definition:Integer Sequence", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Square/Function", "Definition:Decimal Notation", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Integer" ]
[]
proofwiki-13635
Squares whose Digits form Consecutive Decreasing Integers
The sequence of integers whose squares have a decimal representation consisting of the concatenation of $2$ consecutive decreasing integers begins: :$91, 9079, 9901, 733 \, 674, 999 \, 001, 88 \, 225 \, 295, 99 \, 990 \, 001, \ldots$ {{OEIS|A030467}}
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 91^2 | r = 8281 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 9079^2 | r = 82 \, 428 \, 241 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 9901^2 | r = 98 \, 029 \, 801 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 733 \, 674^2 | r = 538 \, 277 \, 538 \, 276 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 999 \, 001^2 | r = 998 ...
The [[Definition:Integer Sequence|sequence]] of [[Definition:Integer|integers]] whose [[Definition:Square (Algebra)|squares]] have a [[Definition:Decimal Notation|decimal representation]] consisting of the concatenation of $2$ consecutive decreasing [[Definition:Integer|integers]] begins: :$91, 9079, 9901, 733 \, 674, ...
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 91^2 | r = 8281 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 9079^2 | r = 82 \, 428 \, 241 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 9901^2 | r = 98 \, 029 \, 801 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 733 \, 674^2 | r = 538 \, 277 \, 538 \, 276 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 999 \, 001^2 | r = 998...
Squares whose Digits form Consecutive Decreasing Integers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Squares_whose_Digits_form_Consecutive_Decreasing_Integers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Squares_whose_Digits_form_Consecutive_Decreasing_Integers
[ "Square Numbers", "Recreational Mathematics" ]
[ "Definition:Integer Sequence", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Square/Function", "Definition:Decimal Notation", "Definition:Integer" ]
[]
proofwiki-13636
Numbers n whose Euler Phi value Divides n + 1
The following integers $n$ satisfy the equation: :$\exists k \in \Z: k \, \map \phi n = n + 1$ where $\phi$ denotes the Euler $\phi$ function: :$83 \, 623 \, 935, 83 \, 623 \, 935 \times 83 \, 623 \, 937$
From {{EulerPhiLink|83,623,935|83 \, 623 \, 935}}: :$\map \phi {83 \, 623 \, 935} = 41 \, 811 \, 968$ and then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 2 \times 41 \, 811 \, 968 | r = 83 \, 623 \, 936 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 1 + 83 \, 623 \, 935 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed|lemma}} Then we have that $83 \, 623 \, 937$...
The following [[Definition:Integer|integers]] $n$ satisfy the equation: :$\exists k \in \Z: k \, \map \phi n = n + 1$ where $\phi$ denotes the [[Definition:Euler Phi Function|Euler $\phi$ function]]: :$83 \, 623 \, 935, 83 \, 623 \, 935 \times 83 \, 623 \, 937$
From {{EulerPhiLink|83,623,935|83 \, 623 \, 935}}: :$\map \phi {83 \, 623 \, 935} = 41 \, 811 \, 968$ and then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 2 \times 41 \, 811 \, 968 | r = 83 \, 623 \, 936 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 1 + 83 \, 623 \, 935 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed|lemma}} Then we have that $83 \, 623 \, ...
Numbers n whose Euler Phi value Divides n + 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Numbers_n_whose_Euler_Phi_value_Divides_n_+_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Numbers_n_whose_Euler_Phi_value_Divides_n_+_1
[ "Euler Phi Function" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Euler Phi Function" ]
[ "Definition:Prime Number", "Euler Phi Function of Prime", "Euler Phi Function is Multiplicative", "Difference of Two Squares" ]
proofwiki-13637
Polynomial is Linear Combination of Monomials
Let $R$ be a commutative ring with unity. Let $R \sqbrk X$ be a polynomial ring over $R$ in the variable $X$. Let $P \in R \sqbrk X$. Then $P$ is a linear combination of the monomials of $R \sqbrk X$, with coefficients in $R$. {{explain|this needs to be made more precise}}
Let $S \subset R \sqbrk X$ be the subset of all elements that are linear combinations of monomials. Let $\iota: S \to R \sqbrk X$ denote the inclusion mapping. Suppose for the moment that $S$ is a commutative ring with unity. Then by Universal Property of Polynomial Ring, there exists a ring homomorphism $g: R \sqbrk X...
Let $R$ be a [[Definition:Commutative Ring with Unity|commutative ring with unity]]. Let $R \sqbrk X$ be a [[Definition:Polynomial Ring|polynomial ring]] over $R$ in the [[Definition:Variable of Polynomial Ring|variable]] $X$. Let $P \in R \sqbrk X$. Then $P$ is a [[Definition:Linear Combination|linear combination]...
Let $S \subset R \sqbrk X$ be the [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of all elements that are [[Definition:Linear Combination|linear combinations]] of [[Definition:Monomial of Polynomial Ring|monomials]]. Let $\iota: S \to R \sqbrk X$ denote the [[Definition:Inclusion Mapping|inclusion mapping]]. Suppose for the moment tha...
Polynomial is Linear Combination of Monomials
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Polynomial_is_Linear_Combination_of_Monomials
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Polynomial_is_Linear_Combination_of_Monomials
[ "Polynomial Theory", "Monomials" ]
[ "Definition:Commutative and Unitary Ring", "Definition:Polynomial Ring", "Definition:Polynomial Ring/Indeterminate", "Definition:Linear Combination", "Definition:Monomial of Polynomial Ring" ]
[ "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Linear Combination", "Definition:Monomial of Polynomial Ring", "Definition:Inclusion Mapping", "Definition:Commutative and Unitary Ring", "Universal Property of Polynomial Ring", "Definition:Ring Homomorphism", "Inclusion Mapping on Subring is Homomorphism", "Definit...
proofwiki-13638
Sum over Disjoint Union of Finite Sets
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the standard number systems $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $S$ and $T$ be finite disjoint sets. Let $S \cup T$ be their union. Let $f: S \cup T \to \mathbb A$ be a mapping. Then we have the equality of summations over finite sets: :$\ds \sum_{u \mathop \in S \mathop \cup T} \map f u = \sum_{s \math...
Note that by Union of Finite Sets is Finite, the union $S \cup T$ is finite. Let $m$ be the cardinality of $S$ and $n$ be the cardinality of $T$. Let $\N_{< m}$ denote an initial segment of the natural numbers. Let $\sigma: \N_{<m} \to S$ and $\tau: \N_{<n} \to T$ be bijections. Let $\alpha: \N_{< n} \to \closedint m {...
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the [[Definition:Standard Number System|standard number systems]] $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $S$ and $T$ be [[Definition:Finite Set|finite]] [[Definition:Disjoint Sets|disjoint sets]]. Let $S \cup T$ be their [[Definition:Set Union|union]]. Let $f: S \cup T \to \mathbb A$ be a [[Definition:M...
Note that by [[Union of Finite Sets is Finite]], the [[Definition:Set Union|union]] $S \cup T$ is [[Definition:Finite Set|finite]]. Let $m$ be the [[Definition:Cardinality of Finite Set|cardinality]] of $S$ and $n$ be the [[Definition:Cardinality of Finite Set|cardinality]] of $T$. Let $\N_{< m}$ denote an [[Definiti...
Sum over Disjoint Union of Finite Sets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_Disjoint_Union_of_Finite_Sets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_Disjoint_Union_of_Finite_Sets
[ "Summations" ]
[ "Definition:Number", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Disjoint Sets", "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Summation", "Definition:Finite Set" ]
[ "Union of Finite Sets is Finite", "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Cardinality/Finite", "Definition:Cardinality/Finite", "Definition:Initial Segment of Natural Numbers", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Mapping", "Translation of Integer Interval is Bijection", "Defin...
proofwiki-13639
Finite Summation does not Change under Permutation
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the standard number systems $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $S$ be a finite set. Let $f: S \to \mathbb A$ be a mapping. Let $\sigma: S \to S$ be a permutation. Then we have the equality of summations over finite sets: :$\ds \sum_{s \mathop \in S} \map f s = \sum_{s \mathop \in S} \map f {\map \sigma...
This is a special case of Change of Variables in Summation over Finite Set. {{qed}} Category:Summations glofy0i42m26o45ix2z326ih5804vid
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the [[Definition:Standard Number System|standard number systems]] $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Finite Set|finite set]]. Let $f: S \to \mathbb A$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]. Let $\sigma: S \to S$ be a [[Definition:Permutation|permutation]]. Then we have the equa...
This is a special case of [[Change of Variables in Summation over Finite Set]]. {{qed}} [[Category:Summations]] glofy0i42m26o45ix2z326ih5804vid
Finite Summation does not Change under Permutation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Finite_Summation_does_not_Change_under_Permutation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Finite_Summation_does_not_Change_under_Permutation
[ "Summations" ]
[ "Definition:Number", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Permutation", "Definition:Summation", "Definition:Finite Set" ]
[ "Change of Variables in Summation over Finite Set", "Category:Summations" ]
proofwiki-13640
Summation over Finite Set is Well-Defined
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the standard number systems $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $S$ be a finite set. Let $f: S \to \mathbb A$ be a mapping. Let $n$ be the cardinality of $S$. let $\N_{<n}$ be an initial segment of the natural numbers. Let $g, h: \N_{<n} \to S$ be bijections. Then we have an equality of indexed summatio...
By Inverse of Bijection is Bijection, $h^{-1} : \N_{<n} \to S$ is a bijection. By Composite of Bijections is Bijection, the composition $h^{-1}\circ g$ is a permutation of $\N_{<n}$. By Indexed Summation does not Change under Permutation, we have an equality of indexed summations: :$\ds \sum_{i \mathop = 0}^{n - 1} \ma...
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the [[Definition:Standard Number System|standard number systems]] $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Finite Set|finite set]]. Let $f: S \to \mathbb A$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]. Let $n$ be the [[Definition:Cardinality of Finite Set|cardinality]] of $S$. let $\N_{<n}$...
By [[Inverse of Bijection is Bijection]], $h^{-1} : \N_{<n} \to S$ is a [[Definition:Bijection|bijection]]. By [[Composite of Bijections is Bijection]], the [[Definition:Composition of Mappings|composition]] $h^{-1}\circ g$ is a [[Definition:Permutation|permutation]] of $\N_{<n}$. By [[Indexed Summation does not Chan...
Summation over Finite Set is Well-Defined
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_over_Finite_Set_is_Well-Defined
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_over_Finite_Set_is_Well-Defined
[ "Summations" ]
[ "Definition:Number", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Cardinality/Finite", "Definition:Initial Segment of Natural Numbers", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Summation/Indexed", "Definition:Composition of Mappings", "Definition:Summation", "Definition:Finite Set", "De...
[ "Inverse of Bijection is Bijection", "Definition:Bijection", "Composite of Bijections is Bijection", "Definition:Composition of Mappings", "Definition:Permutation", "Indexed Summation does not Change under Permutation", "Definition:Summation/Indexed", "Composition of Mappings is Associative", "Compo...
proofwiki-13641
Change of Variables in Summation over Finite Set
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the standard number systems $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $S$ and $T$ be finite sets. Let $f: S \to \mathbb A$ be a mapping. Let $g: T \to S$ be a bijection. Then we have an equality of summations over finite sets: :$\ds \sum_{s \mathop \in S} \map f s = \sum_{t \mathop \in T} \map f {\map g t}$
Let $n$ be the cardinality of $S$ and $T$. Let $\N_{<n}$ be an initial segment of the natural numbers. Let $h : \N_{<n} \to T$ be a bijection. By definition of summation: :$\ds \sum_{t \mathop \in T} \map f {\map g t} = \sum_{i \mathop = 0}^{n - 1} \map f {\map g {\map h i} }$ By Composite of Bijections is Bijection, t...
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the [[Definition:Standard Number System|standard number systems]] $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $S$ and $T$ be [[Definition:Finite Set|finite sets]]. Let $f: S \to \mathbb A$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]. Let $g: T \to S$ be a [[Definition:Bijection|bijection]]. Then we have an equalit...
Let $n$ be the [[Definition:Cardinality of Finite Set|cardinality]] of $S$ and $T$. Let $\N_{<n}$ be an [[Definition:Initial Segment of Natural Numbers|initial segment of the natural numbers]]. Let $h : \N_{<n} \to T$ be a [[Definition:Bijection|bijection]]. By definition of [[Definition:Summation|summation]]: :$\ds...
Change of Variables in Summation over Finite Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Change_of_Variables_in_Summation_over_Finite_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Change_of_Variables_in_Summation_over_Finite_Set
[ "Summations" ]
[ "Definition:Number", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Summation", "Definition:Finite Set" ]
[ "Definition:Cardinality/Finite", "Definition:Initial Segment of Natural Numbers", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Summation", "Composite of Bijections is Bijection", "Definition:Composition of Mappings", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Summation" ]
proofwiki-13642
Indexed Summation does not Change under Permutation
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the standard number systems $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $a$ and $b$ be integers. Let $\closedint a b$ be the integer interval between $a$ and $b$. Let $f: \closedint a b \to \mathbb A$ be a mapping. Let $\sigma: \closedint a b \to \closedint a b$ be a permutation. Then we have an equality of ind...
Let $a > b$. Then by definition of indexed summation, both sides are $0$. Let $a \le b$.
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the [[Definition:Standard Number System|standard number systems]] $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $a$ and $b$ be [[Definition:Integer|integers]]. Let $\closedint a b$ be the [[Definition:Integer Interval|integer interval]] between $a$ and $b$. Let $f: \closedint a b \to \mathbb A$ be a [[Definiti...
Let $a > b$. Then by definition of [[Definition:Indexed Summation|indexed summation]], both sides are $0$. Let $a \le b$.
Indexed Summation does not Change under Permutation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Indexed_Summation_does_not_Change_under_Permutation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Indexed_Summation_does_not_Change_under_Permutation
[ "Summations" ]
[ "Definition:Number", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Closed Interval/Integer Interval", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Permutation", "Definition:Summation/Indexed" ]
[ "Definition:Summation/Indexed" ]
proofwiki-13643
Indexed Summation over Translated Interval
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the standard number systems $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $a$ and $b$ be integers. Let $\closedint a b$ be the integer interval between $a$ and $b$. Let $f: \closedint a b \to \mathbb A$ be a mapping. Let $c\in\Z$ be an integer. Then we have an equality of indexed summations: :$\ds \sum_{i \mathop...
The proof goes by induction on $b$.
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the [[Definition:Standard Number System|standard number systems]] $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $a$ and $b$ be [[Definition:Integer|integers]]. Let $\closedint a b$ be the [[Definition:Integer Interval|integer interval]] between $a$ and $b$. Let $f: \closedint a b \to \mathbb A$ be a [[Definiti...
The proof goes by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]] on $b$.
Indexed Summation over Translated Interval
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Indexed_Summation_over_Translated_Interval
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Indexed_Summation_over_Translated_Interval
[ "Summations" ]
[ "Definition:Number", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Closed Interval/Integer Interval", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Summation/Indexed" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Principle of Mathematical Induction" ]
proofwiki-13644
Indexed Summation over Adjacent Intervals
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the standard number systems $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $a, b, c$ be integers. Let $\closedint a c$ denote the integer interval between $a$ and $c$. Let $b \in \closedint {a - 1} c$. Let $f : \closedint a c \to \mathbb A$ be a mapping. Then we have an equality of indexed summations: :$\ds \sum_{...
The proof goes by induction on $b$.
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the [[Definition:Standard Number System|standard number systems]] $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $a, b, c$ be [[Definition:Integer|integers]]. Let $\closedint a c$ denote the [[Definition:Integer Interval|integer interval]] between $a$ and $c$. Let $b \in \closedint {a - 1} c$. Let $f : \closed...
The proof goes by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]] on $b$.
Indexed Summation over Adjacent Intervals
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Indexed_Summation_over_Adjacent_Intervals
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Indexed_Summation_over_Adjacent_Intervals
[ "Summations" ]
[ "Definition:Number", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Closed Interval/Integer Interval", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Summation/Indexed" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Principle of Mathematical Induction" ]
proofwiki-13645
Indexed Summation over Interval of Length Two
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the standard number systems $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $a \in \Z$ be an integer. Let $f: \set {a, a + 1} \to \mathbb A$ be a real-valued function. Then the indexed summation: :$\ds \sum_{i \mathop = a}^{a + 1} \map f i = \map f a + \map f {a + 1}$
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{i \mathop = a}^{a + 1} \map f i | r = \sum_{i \mathop = a}^a \map f i + \map f {a + 1} | c = {{Defof|Indexed Summation}} }} {{eqn | l = | r = \map f a + \map f {a + 1} | c = Indexed Summation over Interval of Length One }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} Category:Su...
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the [[Definition:Standard Number System|standard number systems]] $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $a \in \Z$ be an [[Definition:Integer|integer]]. Let $f: \set {a, a + 1} \to \mathbb A$ be a [[Definition:Real-Valued Function|real-valued function]]. Then the [[Definition:Indexed Summation|indexed...
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{i \mathop = a}^{a + 1} \map f i | r = \sum_{i \mathop = a}^a \map f i + \map f {a + 1} | c = {{Defof|Indexed Summation}} }} {{eqn | l = | r = \map f a + \map f {a + 1} | c = [[Indexed Summation over Interval of Length One]] }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} [[Cate...
Indexed Summation over Interval of Length Two
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Indexed_Summation_over_Interval_of_Length_Two
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Indexed_Summation_over_Interval_of_Length_Two
[ "Summations" ]
[ "Definition:Number", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Real-Valued Function", "Definition:Summation/Indexed" ]
[ "Indexed Summation over Interval of Length One", "Category:Summations" ]
proofwiki-13646
Indexed Summation over Interval of Length One
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the standard number systems $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $a \in \Z$ be an integer. Let $f: \set a \to \mathbb A$ be a mapping on the singleton $\set a$. Then the indexed summation: :$\ds \sum_{i \mathop = a}^a \map f i = \map f a$
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{i \mathop = a}^a \map f i | r = \sum_{i \mathop = a}^{a - 1} \map f i + \map f a | c = {{Defof|Indexed Summation}} }} {{eqn | l = | r = 0 + \map f a | c = {{Defof|Indexed Summation}}, $a - 1 < a$ }} {{eqn | l = | r = \map f a | c = Identity ...
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the [[Definition:Standard Number System|standard number systems]] $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $a \in \Z$ be an [[Definition:Integer|integer]]. Let $f: \set a \to \mathbb A$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]] on the [[Definition:Singleton|singleton]] $\set a$. Then the [[Definition:Indexed S...
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{i \mathop = a}^a \map f i | r = \sum_{i \mathop = a}^{a - 1} \map f i + \map f a | c = {{Defof|Indexed Summation}} }} {{eqn | l = | r = 0 + \map f a | c = {{Defof|Indexed Summation}}, $a - 1 < a$ }} {{eqn | l = | r = \map f a | c = [[Identit...
Indexed Summation over Interval of Length One
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Indexed_Summation_over_Interval_of_Length_One
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Indexed_Summation_over_Interval_of_Length_One
[ "Summations" ]
[ "Definition:Number", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Singleton", "Definition:Summation/Indexed" ]
[ "Identity Element of Addition on Numbers" ]
proofwiki-13647
Change of Variables in Indexed Summation
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the standard number systems $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $a, b, c, d$ be integers. Let $\closedint a b$ denote the integer interval between $a$ and $b$. Let $f: \closedint a b \to \mathbb A$ be a mapping. Let $g: \closedint c d \to \closedint a b$ be a bijection. Then we have an equality of index...
Because $g : \closedint c d \to \closedint a b$ is a bijection, these sets are equivalent. By Cardinality of Integer Interval, $\closedint a b$ has cardinality $b - a + 1$. Thus: :$b - a + 1 = d - c + 1$ Thus :$c - a = d - b$ By Indexed Summation over Translated Interval: :$\ds \sum_{i \mathop = c}^d \map f {\map g i} ...
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the [[Definition:Standard Number System|standard number systems]] $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $a, b, c, d$ be [[Definition:Integer|integers]]. Let $\closedint a b$ denote the [[Definition:Integer Interval|integer interval]] between $a$ and $b$. Let $f: \closedint a b \to \mathbb A$ be a [[Def...
Because $g : \closedint c d \to \closedint a b$ is a [[Definition:Bijection|bijection]], these [[Definition:Set|sets]] are [[Definition:Set Equivalence|equivalent]]. By [[Cardinality of Integer Interval]], $\closedint a b$ has [[Definition:Cardinality of Finite Set|cardinality]] $b - a + 1$. Thus: :$b - a + 1 = d - c...
Change of Variables in Indexed Summation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Change_of_Variables_in_Indexed_Summation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Change_of_Variables_in_Indexed_Summation
[ "Summations" ]
[ "Definition:Number", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Closed Interval/Integer Interval", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Summation/Indexed" ]
[ "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Set Equivalence", "Cardinality of Integer Interval", "Definition:Cardinality/Finite", "Indexed Summation over Translated Interval", "Translation of Integer Interval is Bijection", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Bijection", "Composite of Bije...
proofwiki-13648
Translation of Integer Interval is Bijection
Let $a, b, c \in \Z$ be integers. Let $\closedint a b$ denote the integer interval between $a$ and $b$. Then the mapping $T: \closedint a b \to \closedint {a + c} {b + c}$ defined as: :$\map T k = k + c$ is a bijection.
Note that if $k \in \closedint a b$, then indeed $k + c \in \closedint {a + c} {b + c}$.
Let $a, b, c \in \Z$ be [[Definition:Integer|integers]]. Let $\closedint a b$ denote the [[Definition:Integer Interval|integer interval]] between $a$ and $b$. Then the [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]] $T: \closedint a b \to \closedint {a + c} {b + c}$ defined as: :$\map T k = k + c$ is a [[Definition:Bijection|bijecti...
Note that if $k \in \closedint a b$, then indeed $k + c \in \closedint {a + c} {b + c}$.
Translation of Integer Interval is Bijection
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Translation_of_Integer_Interval_is_Bijection
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Translation_of_Integer_Interval_is_Bijection
[ "Set Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Closed Interval/Integer Interval", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Bijection" ]
[]
proofwiki-13649
Indexed Summation without First Term
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the standard number systems $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $a$ and $b$ be integers with $a \le b$. Let $\closedint a b$ be the integer interval between $a$ and $b$. Let $f: \closedint a b \to \mathbb A$ be a mapping. Then we have an equality of indexed summations: :$\ds \sum_{i \mathop = a}^b \map ...
The proof goes by induction on $b$.
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the [[Definition:Standard Number System|standard number systems]] $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $a$ and $b$ be [[Definition:Integer|integers]] with $a \le b$. Let $\closedint a b$ be the [[Definition:Integer Interval|integer interval]] between $a$ and $b$. Let $f: \closedint a b \to \mathbb A$ ...
The proof goes by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]] on $b$.
Indexed Summation without First Term
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Indexed_Summation_without_First_Term
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Indexed_Summation_without_First_Term
[ "Summations" ]
[ "Definition:Number", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Closed Interval/Integer Interval", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Summation/Indexed" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Principle of Mathematical Induction" ]
proofwiki-13650
Summation over Interval equals Indexed Summation
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the standard number systems $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $a, b \in \Z$ be integers. Let $\closedint a b$ be the integer interval between $a$ and $b$. Let $f: \closedint a b \to \mathbb A$ be a mapping. Then the summation over the finite set $\closedint a b$ equals the indexed summation from $a$ t...
By Cardinality of Integer Interval, $\closedint a b$ has cardinality $b - a + 1$. By Translation of Integer Interval is Bijection, the mapping $T : \closedint 0 {b - a} \to \closedint a b$ defined as: :$\map T k = k + a$ is a bijection. By definition of summation: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop \in \closedint a b} \map f k = \s...
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the [[Definition:Standard Number System|standard number systems]] $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $a, b \in \Z$ be [[Definition:Integer|integers]]. Let $\closedint a b$ be the [[Definition:Integer Interval|integer interval]] between $a$ and $b$. Let $f: \closedint a b \to \mathbb A$ be a [[Defini...
By [[Cardinality of Integer Interval]], $\closedint a b$ has [[Definition:Cardinality of Finite Set|cardinality]] $b - a + 1$. By [[Translation of Integer Interval is Bijection]], the [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]] $T : \closedint 0 {b - a} \to \closedint a b$ defined as: :$\map T k = k + a$ is a [[Definition:Bijectio...
Summation over Interval equals Indexed Summation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_over_Interval_equals_Indexed_Summation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_over_Interval_equals_Indexed_Summation
[ "Summations" ]
[ "Definition:Number", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Closed Interval/Integer Interval", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Summation", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Summation/Indexed" ]
[ "Cardinality of Integer Interval", "Definition:Cardinality/Finite", "Translation of Integer Interval is Bijection", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Summation", "Indexed Summation over Translated Interval", "Category:Summations" ]
proofwiki-13651
Hardy-Ramanujan Number/Examples/1729
The $2$nd Hardy-Ramanujan number $\map {\operatorname {Ta}} 2$ is $1729$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1729 | r = 12^3 + 1^3 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 10^3 + 9^3 | c = }} {{end-eqn}}
We wish to demonstrate that $1729$ is the $2$nd '''Hardy-Ramanujan number''' making it the smallest positive integer which can be expressed as the sum of $2$ positive cubes in $2$ different ways. To accomplish this, we will need to inspect $66$ sums of $a^3 + b^3$ starting with $1^3 + 1^3$ and ending with $11^3 + 11^3$...
The $2$nd [[Definition:Hardy-Ramanujan Number|Hardy-Ramanujan number]] $\map {\operatorname {Ta}} 2$ is $1729$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1729 | r = 12^3 + 1^3 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 10^3 + 9^3 | c = }} {{end-eqn}}
We wish to demonstrate that $1729$ is the $2$nd '''[[Definition:Hardy-Ramanujan Number|Hardy-Ramanujan number]]''' making it the smallest [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integer]] which can be expressed as the [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of $2$ [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive]] [[Definition:Cube N...
Hardy-Ramanujan Number/Examples/1729
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hardy-Ramanujan_Number/Examples/1729
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hardy-Ramanujan_Number/Examples/1729
[ "Hardy-Ramanujan Numbers", "Taxicab Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Hardy-Ramanujan Number" ]
[ "Definition:Hardy-Ramanujan Number", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Cube Number", "Integer Addition is Commutative", "Definition:Cube Number", "Closed Form for Triangular Numbers", "Definition:Strictly Positive/Integer", "F...
proofwiki-13652
Cardinality of Integer Interval
Let $a, b \in \Z$ be integers. Let $\left[{a \,.\,.\, b}\right]$ denote the integer interval between $a$ and $b$. Then $\left[{a \,.\,.\, b}\right]$ is finite and its cardinality equals: :$\begin{cases} b - a + 1 & : b \ge a - 1 \\ 0 & : b \le a - 1 \end{cases}$
Let $b < a$. Then $\left[{a \,.\,.\, b}\right]$ is empty. By Empty Set is Finite, $\left[{a \,.\,.\, b}\right]$ is finite. By Cardinality of Empty Set, $\left[{a \,.\,.\, b}\right]$ has cardinality $0$. Let $b \ge a$. By Translation of Integer Interval is Bijection, there exists a bijection between $\left[{a \,.\,.\, b...
Let $a, b \in \Z$ be [[Definition:Integer|integers]]. Let $\left[{a \,.\,.\, b}\right]$ denote the [[Definition:Integer Interval|integer interval]] between $a$ and $b$. Then $\left[{a \,.\,.\, b}\right]$ is [[Definition:Finite Set|finite]] and its [[Definition:Cardinality of Finite Set|cardinality]] equals: :$\begin...
Let $b < a$. Then $\left[{a \,.\,.\, b}\right]$ is [[Definition:Empty Set|empty]]. By [[Empty Set is Finite]], $\left[{a \,.\,.\, b}\right]$ is [[Definition:Finite Set|finite]]. By [[Cardinality of Empty Set]], $\left[{a \,.\,.\, b}\right]$ has [[Definition:Cardinality of Finite Set|cardinality]] $0$. Let $b \ge a$...
Cardinality of Integer Interval
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cardinality_of_Integer_Interval
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cardinality_of_Integer_Interval
[ "Set Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Closed Interval/Integer Interval", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Cardinality/Finite" ]
[ "Definition:Empty Set", "Empty Set is Finite", "Definition:Finite Set", "Cardinality of Empty Set", "Definition:Cardinality/Finite", "Translation of Integer Interval is Bijection", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Cardinality/Finite", "Category:Set Theory" ]
proofwiki-13653
Indexed Summation of Sum of Mappings
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the standard number systems $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $a, b$ be integers. Let $\closedint a b$ denote the integer interval between $a$ and $b$. Let $f, g: \closedint a b \to \mathbb A$ be mappings. Let $h = f + g$ be their pointwise sum. Then we have the equality of indexed summations: :$\ds \...
The proof proceeds by induction on $b$. For all $b \in \Z_{\ge 0}$, let $\map P b$ be the proposition: :$\ds \sum_{i \mathop = a}^b \map h i = \sum_{i \mathop = a}^b \map f i + \sum_{i \mathop = a}^b \map g i$
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the [[Definition:Standard Number System|standard number systems]] $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $a, b$ be [[Definition:Integer|integers]]. Let $\closedint a b$ denote the [[Definition:Integer Interval|integer interval]] between $a$ and $b$. Let $f, g: \closedint a b \to \mathbb A$ be [[Definiti...
The proof proceeds by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]] on $b$. For all $b \in \Z_{\ge 0}$, let $\map P b$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :$\ds \sum_{i \mathop = a}^b \map h i = \sum_{i \mathop = a}^b \map f i + \sum_{i \mathop = a}^b \map g i$
Indexed Summation of Sum of Mappings
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Indexed_Summation_of_Sum_of_Mappings
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Indexed_Summation_of_Sum_of_Mappings
[ "Summations" ]
[ "Definition:Number", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Closed Interval/Integer Interval", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Pointwise Addition", "Definition:Summation/Indexed" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Proposition", "Principle of Mathematical Induction" ]
proofwiki-13654
Summation of Sum of Mappings on Finite Set
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the standard number systems $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $S$ be a finite set. Let $f, g: S \to \mathbb A$ be mappings. Let $h = f + g$ be their sum. Then we have the equality of summations on finite sets: :$\ds \sum_{s \mathop \in S} \map h s = \sum_{s \mathop \in S} \map f s + \sum_{s \mathop \i...
Let $n$ be the cardinality of $S$. Let $\sigma: \N_{< n} \to S$ be a bijection, where $\N_{< n}$ is an initial segment of the natural numbers. By definition of summation, we have to prove the following equality of indexed summations: :$\ds \sum_{i \mathop = 0}^{n - 1} \map h {\map \sigma i} = \sum_{i \mathop = 0}^{n - ...
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the [[Definition:Standard Number System|standard number systems]] $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Finite Set|finite set]]. Let $f, g: S \to \mathbb A$ be [[Definition:Mapping|mappings]]. Let $h = f + g$ be their [[Definition:Sum of Mappings|sum]]. Then we have the equality...
Let $n$ be the [[Definition:Cardinality of Finite Set|cardinality]] of $S$. Let $\sigma: \N_{< n} \to S$ be a [[Definition:Bijection|bijection]], where $\N_{< n}$ is an [[Definition:Initial Segment of Natural Numbers|initial segment of the natural numbers]]. By definition of [[Definition:Summation|summation]], we hav...
Summation of Sum of Mappings on Finite Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_of_Sum_of_Mappings_on_Finite_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_of_Sum_of_Mappings_on_Finite_Set
[ "Summations" ]
[ "Definition:Number", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Sum of Mappings", "Definition:Summation", "Definition:Finite Set" ]
[ "Definition:Cardinality/Finite", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Initial Segment of Natural Numbers", "Definition:Summation", "Definition:Summation/Indexed", "Sum of Mappings Composed with Mapping", "Indexed Summation of Sum of Mappings" ]
proofwiki-13655
Indexed Summation of Multiple of Mapping
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the standard number systems $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $a, b$ be integers. Let $\closedint a b$ denote the integer interval between $a$ and $b$. Let $f: \closedint a b \to \mathbb A$ be a mapping. Let $\lambda \in \mathbb A$. Let $g = \lambda \cdot f$ be the product of $f$ with $\lambda$. Then ...
The proof goes by induction on $b$.
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the [[Definition:Standard Number System|standard number systems]] $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $a, b$ be [[Definition:Integer|integers]]. Let $\closedint a b$ denote the [[Definition:Integer Interval|integer interval]] between $a$ and $b$. Let $f: \closedint a b \to \mathbb A$ be a [[Definitio...
The proof goes by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]] on $b$.
Indexed Summation of Multiple of Mapping
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Indexed_Summation_of_Multiple_of_Mapping
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Indexed_Summation_of_Multiple_of_Mapping
[ "Summations" ]
[ "Definition:Number", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Closed Interval/Integer Interval", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Product of Mapping with Scalar", "Definition:Summation/Indexed" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Principle of Mathematical Induction" ]
proofwiki-13656
Summation of Multiple of Mapping on Finite Set
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the standard number systems $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $S$ be a finite set. Let $f: S \to \mathbb A$ be a mapping. Let $\lambda \in \mathbb A$. Let $g = \lambda \cdot f$ be the product of $f$ with $\lambda$. Then we have the equality of summations on finite sets: :$\ds \sum_{s \mathop \in S} \m...
Let $n$ be the cardinality of $S$. Let $\sigma: \N_{< n} \to S$ be a bijection, where $\N_{< n}$ is an initial segment of the natural numbers. By definition of summation, we have to prove the following equality of indexed summations: :$\ds \sum_{i \mathop = 0}^{n - 1} \map g {\map \sigma i} = \lambda \cdot \sum_{i \mat...
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the [[Definition:Standard Number System|standard number systems]] $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Finite Set|finite set]]. Let $f: S \to \mathbb A$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]. Let $\lambda \in \mathbb A$. Let $g = \lambda \cdot f$ be the [[Definition:Product of Map...
Let $n$ be the [[Definition:Cardinality of Finite Set|cardinality]] of $S$. Let $\sigma: \N_{< n} \to S$ be a [[Definition:Bijection|bijection]], where $\N_{< n}$ is an [[Definition:Initial Segment of Natural Numbers|initial segment of the natural numbers]]. By definition of [[Definition:Summation|summation]], we hav...
Summation of Multiple of Mapping on Finite Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_of_Multiple_of_Mapping_on_Finite_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_of_Multiple_of_Mapping_on_Finite_Set
[ "Summations" ]
[ "Definition:Number", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Product of Mapping with Scalar", "Definition:Summation", "Definition:Finite Set" ]
[ "Definition:Cardinality/Finite", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Initial Segment of Natural Numbers", "Definition:Summation", "Definition:Summation/Indexed", "Multiple of Mapping Composed with Mapping", "Indexed Summation of Multiple of Mapping" ]
proofwiki-13657
Linear Combination of Indexed Summations
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the standard number systems $\N,\Z,\Q,\R,\C$. Let $a,b$ be integers. Let $\closedint a b$ denote the integer interval between $a$ and $b$. Let $f, g : \closedint a b \to \mathbb A$ be mappings. Let $\lambda, \mu \in \mathbb A$. Let $\lambda \cdot f + \mu \cdot g$ be the sum of the product of $...
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{i \mathop = a}^b \paren {\lambda \cdot \map f i + \mu \cdot \map g i} | r = \sum_{i \mathop = a}^b \paren {\lambda \cdot \map f i} + \sum_{i \mathop = a}^b \paren {\mu \cdot \map g i} | c = Indexed Summation of Sum of Mappings }} {{eqn | r = \lambda \cdot \sum_{i \ma...
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the [[Definition:Standard Number System|standard number systems]] $\N,\Z,\Q,\R,\C$. Let $a,b$ be [[Definition:Integer|integers]]. Let $\closedint a b$ denote the [[Definition:Integer Interval|integer interval]] between $a$ and $b$. Let $f, g : \closedint a b \to \mathbb A$ be [[Definition:M...
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{i \mathop = a}^b \paren {\lambda \cdot \map f i + \mu \cdot \map g i} | r = \sum_{i \mathop = a}^b \paren {\lambda \cdot \map f i} + \sum_{i \mathop = a}^b \paren {\mu \cdot \map g i} | c = [[Indexed Summation of Sum of Mappings]] }} {{eqn | r = \lambda \cdot \sum_{i...
Linear Combination of Indexed Summations
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Linear_Combination_of_Indexed_Summations
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Linear_Combination_of_Indexed_Summations
[ "Summations" ]
[ "Definition:Number", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Closed Interval/Integer Interval", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Sum of Mappings", "Definition:Product of Mapping with Scalar", "Definition:Product of Mapping with Scalar", "Definition:Summation/Indexed" ]
[ "Indexed Summation of Sum of Mappings", "Indexed Summation of Multiple of Mapping" ]
proofwiki-13658
Triangle Inequality for Indexed Summations
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the standard number systems $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $a,b$ be integers. Let $\closedint a b$ denote the integer interval between $a$ and $b$. Let $f : \closedint a b \to \mathbb A$ be a mapping. Let $\size {\, \cdot \,}$ denote the standard absolute value. Let $\vert f \vert$ be the absolute ...
The proof goes by induction on $b$.
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the [[Definition:Standard Number System|standard number systems]] $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $a,b$ be [[Definition:Integer|integers]]. Let $\closedint a b$ denote the [[Definition:Integer Interval|integer interval]] between $a$ and $b$. Let $f : \closedint a b \to \mathbb A$ be a [[Definitio...
The proof goes by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]] on $b$.
Triangle Inequality for Indexed Summations
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Triangle_Inequality_for_Indexed_Summations
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Triangle_Inequality_for_Indexed_Summations
[ "Summations", "Triangle Inequality" ]
[ "Definition:Number", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Closed Interval/Integer Interval", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Standard Absolute Value", "Definition:Absolute Value of Mapping", "Definition:Inequality", "Definition:Summation/Indexed" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Principle of Mathematical Induction" ]
proofwiki-13659
Triangle Inequality for Summation over Finite Set
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the standard number systems $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $S$ be a finite set. Let $f : S \to \mathbb A$ be a mapping. Let $\size {\, \cdot\,}$ denote the standard absolute value. Let $\size f$ be the absoute value of $f$. Then we have the inequality of summations on finite sets: :$\ds \size {\sum...
Let $n$ be the cardinality of $S$. Let $\sigma: \N_{< n} \to S$ be a bijection, where $\N_{<n}$ is an initial segment of the natural numbers. By definition of summation, we have to prove the following inequality of indexed summations: :$\ds \size {\sum_{i \mathop = 0}^{n - 1} \map f {\map \sigma i} } \le \sum_{i \matho...
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the [[Definition:Standard Number System|standard number systems]] $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Finite Set|finite set]]. Let $f : S \to \mathbb A$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]. Let $\size {\, \cdot\,}$ denote the [[Definition:Standard Absolute Value|standard absolut...
Let $n$ be the [[Definition:Cardinality of Finite Set|cardinality]] of $S$. Let $\sigma: \N_{< n} \to S$ be a [[Definition:Bijection|bijection]], where $\N_{<n}$ is an [[Definition:Initial Segment of Natural Numbers|initial segment of the natural numbers]]. By definition of [[Definition:Summation|summation]], we have...
Triangle Inequality for Summation over Finite Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Triangle_Inequality_for_Summation_over_Finite_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Triangle_Inequality_for_Summation_over_Finite_Set
[ "Summations", "Triangle Inequality" ]
[ "Definition:Number", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Standard Absolute Value", "Definition:Absolute Value of Mapping", "Definition:Inequality", "Definition:Summation", "Definition:Finite Set" ]
[ "Definition:Cardinality/Finite", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Initial Segment of Natural Numbers", "Definition:Summation", "Definition:Inequality", "Definition:Summation/Indexed", "Absolute Value of Mapping Composed with Mapping", "Triangle Inequality for Indexed Summations" ]
proofwiki-13660
Exchange of Order of Indexed Summations/Rectangular Domain
Let $D = \closedint a b \times \closedint c d$ be the cartesian product. Let $f: D \to \mathbb A$ be a mapping Then we have an equality of indexed summations: :$\ds \sum_{i \mathop = a}^b \sum_{j \mathop = c}^d \map f {i, j} = \sum_{j \mathop = c}^d \sum_{i \mathop = a}^b \map f {i, j}$
The proof proceeds by induction on $d$.
Let $D = \closedint a b \times \closedint c d$ be the [[Definition:Cartesian Product|cartesian product]]. Let $f: D \to \mathbb A$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]] Then we have an equality of [[Definition:Indexed Summation|indexed summations]]: :$\ds \sum_{i \mathop = a}^b \sum_{j \mathop = c}^d \map f {i, j} = \...
The proof proceeds by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]] on $d$.
Exchange of Order of Indexed Summations/Rectangular Domain
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Exchange_of_Order_of_Indexed_Summations/Rectangular_Domain
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Exchange_of_Order_of_Indexed_Summations/Rectangular_Domain
[ "Summations" ]
[ "Definition:Cartesian Product", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Summation/Indexed" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Principle of Mathematical Induction" ]
proofwiki-13661
Exchange of Order of Summations over Finite Sets/Cartesian Product
Let $f: S \times T \to \mathbb A$ be a mapping. Then we have an equality of summations over finite sets: :$\ds \sum_{s \mathop \in S} \sum_{t \mathop \in T} \map f {s, t} = \sum_{t \mathop \in T} \sum_{s \mathop \in S} \map f {s, t}$
Let $n$ be the cardinality of $T$. The proof goes by induction on $n$. === Basis for the Induction === Let $n = 0$. {{finish}} === Induction Step === Let $n > 0$. Let $t \in T$. Use Cardinality of Set minus Singleton {{ProofWanted}}
Let $f: S \times T \to \mathbb A$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]. Then we have an equality of [[Definition:Summation|summations]] over [[Definition:Finite Set|finite sets]]: :$\ds \sum_{s \mathop \in S} \sum_{t \mathop \in T} \map f {s, t} = \sum_{t \mathop \in T} \sum_{s \mathop \in S} \map f {s, t}$
Let $n$ be the [[Definition:Cardinality of Finite Set|cardinality]] of $T$. The proof goes by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]] on $n$. === Basis for the Induction === Let $n = 0$. {{finish}} === Induction Step === Let $n > 0$. Let $t \in T$. Use [[Cardinality of Set minus Singleton]] {{Proof...
Exchange of Order of Summations over Finite Sets/Cartesian Product/Proof 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Exchange_of_Order_of_Summations_over_Finite_Sets/Cartesian_Product
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Exchange_of_Order_of_Summations_over_Finite_Sets/Cartesian_Product/Proof_3
[ "Summations", "Exchange of Order of Summations over Finite Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Summation", "Definition:Finite Set" ]
[ "Definition:Cardinality/Finite", "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Cardinality of Set minus Singleton" ]
proofwiki-13662
Exchange of Order of Summations over Finite Sets
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the standard number systems $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $S, T$ be finite sets. Let $S \times T$ be their cartesian product.
Let $n$ be the cardinality of $T$. The proof goes by induction on $n$. === Basis for the Induction === Let $n = 0$. {{finish}} === Induction Step === Let $n > 0$. Let $t \in T$. Use Cardinality of Set minus Singleton {{ProofWanted}}
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the [[Definition:Standard Number System|standard number systems]] $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $S, T$ be [[Definition:Finite Set|finite sets]]. Let $S \times T$ be their [[Definition:Cartesian Product|cartesian product]].
Let $n$ be the [[Definition:Cardinality of Finite Set|cardinality]] of $T$. The proof goes by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]] on $n$. === Basis for the Induction === Let $n = 0$. {{finish}} === Induction Step === Let $n > 0$. Let $t \in T$. Use [[Cardinality of Set minus Singleton]] {{Proof...
Exchange of Order of Summations over Finite Sets/Cartesian Product/Proof 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Exchange_of_Order_of_Summations_over_Finite_Sets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Exchange_of_Order_of_Summations_over_Finite_Sets/Cartesian_Product/Proof_3
[ "Summations" ]
[ "Definition:Number", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Cartesian Product" ]
[ "Definition:Cardinality/Finite", "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Cardinality of Set minus Singleton" ]
proofwiki-13663
Sum over Complement of Finite Set
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the standard number systems $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $S$ be a finite set. Let $f: S \to \mathbb A$ be a mapping. Let $T \subseteq S$ be a subset. Let $S \setminus T$ be its relative complement. Then we have the equality of summations over finite sets: :$\ds \sum_{s \mathop \in S \setminus T} ...
Note that by Subset of Finite Set is Finite, $T$ is indeed finite. By Set is Disjoint Union of Subset and Relative Complement, $S$ is the disjoint union of $S \setminus T$ and $T$. The result now follows from Sum over Disjoint Union of Finite Sets. {{qed}}
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the [[Definition:Standard Number System|standard number systems]] $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Finite Set|finite set]]. Let $f: S \to \mathbb A$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]. Let $T \subseteq S$ be a [[Definition:Subset|subset]]. Let $S \setminus T$ be its [[Defin...
Note that by [[Subset of Finite Set is Finite]], $T$ is indeed [[Definition:Finite Set|finite]]. By [[Set is Disjoint Union of Subset and Relative Complement]], $S$ is the [[Definition:Disjoint Union|disjoint union]] of $S \setminus T$ and $T$. The result now follows from [[Sum over Disjoint Union of Finite Sets]]. {...
Sum over Complement of Finite Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_Complement_of_Finite_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_Complement_of_Finite_Set
[ "Summations" ]
[ "Definition:Number", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Relative Complement", "Definition:Summation", "Definition:Finite Set" ]
[ "Subset of Finite Set is Finite", "Definition:Finite Set", "Set is Disjoint Union of Subset and Relative Complement", "Definition:Disjoint Union", "Sum over Disjoint Union of Finite Sets" ]
proofwiki-13664
Mapping Defines Additive Function of Subalgebra of Power Set
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the standard number systems $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $S$ be a finite set. Let $f: S \to \mathbb A$ be a mapping. Let $B$ be an algebra of sets over $S$. Define $\Sigma: B \to \mathbb A$ using summation as: :$\ds \map \Sigma T = \sum_{t \mathop \in T} \map f t$ for $T\subseteq S$. Then $\Sigma...
Note that by Subset of Finite Set is Finite, $B$ consists of finite sets. The result now follows from Sum over Disjoint Union of Finite Sets. {{qed}}
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the [[Definition:Standard Number System|standard number systems]] $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Finite Set|finite set]]. Let $f: S \to \mathbb A$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]. Let $B$ be an [[Definition:Algebra of Sets|algebra of sets]] over $S$. Define $\Sigma: B ...
Note that by [[Subset of Finite Set is Finite]], $B$ consists of [[Definition:Finite Set|finite sets]]. The result now follows from [[Sum over Disjoint Union of Finite Sets]]. {{qed}}
Mapping Defines Additive Function of Subalgebra of Power Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Mapping_Defines_Additive_Function_of_Subalgebra_of_Power_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Mapping_Defines_Additive_Function_of_Subalgebra_of_Power_Set
[ "Summations" ]
[ "Definition:Number", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Algebra of Sets", "Definition:Summation", "Definition:Additive Function (Measure Theory)" ]
[ "Subset of Finite Set is Finite", "Definition:Finite Set", "Sum over Disjoint Union of Finite Sets" ]
proofwiki-13665
Sum over Union of Finite Sets
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the standard number systems $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $S$ and $T$ be finite sets. Let $f: S \cup T \to \mathbb A$ be a mapping. Then we have the equality of summations over finite sets: :$\ds \sum_{u \mathop \in S \mathop \cup T} \map f u = \sum_{s \mathop \in S} \map f s + \sum_{t \mathop \in...
Follows from: :Mapping Defines Additive Function of Subalgebra of Power Set :Power Set is Algebra of Sets :Inclusion-Exclusion Principle {{qed}}
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the [[Definition:Standard Number System|standard number systems]] $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $S$ and $T$ be [[Definition:Finite Set|finite sets]]. Let $f: S \cup T \to \mathbb A$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]. Then we have the equality of [[Definition:Summation|summations]] over [[Def...
Follows from: :[[Mapping Defines Additive Function of Subalgebra of Power Set]] :[[Power Set is Algebra of Sets]] :[[Inclusion-Exclusion Principle]] {{qed}}
Sum over Union of Finite Sets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_Union_of_Finite_Sets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_Union_of_Finite_Sets
[ "Summations" ]
[ "Definition:Number", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Summation", "Definition:Finite Set" ]
[ "Mapping Defines Additive Function of Subalgebra of Power Set", "Power Set is Algebra of Sets", "Inclusion-Exclusion Principle" ]
proofwiki-13666
Summation over Finite Set Equals Summation over Support
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the standard number systems $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $S$ be a finite set. Let $f: S \to \mathbb A$ be a mapping. Let $\map \supp f$ be its support. Then we have an equality of summations over finite sets: :$\ds \sum_{s \mathop \in S} \map f s = \sum_{s \mathop \in \map \supp f} \map f s$
Note that by Subset of Finite Set is Finite, $\map \supp f$ is indeed finite. The result now follows from: * Sum over Complement of Finite Set * Sum of Zero over Finite Set * Identity Element of Addition on Numbers {{qed}}
Let $\mathbb A$ be one of the [[Definition:Standard Number System|standard number systems]] $\N, \Z, \Q, \R, \C$. Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Finite Set|finite set]]. Let $f: S \to \mathbb A$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]. Let $\map \supp f$ be its [[Definition:Support of Mapping to Algebraic Structure|support]]...
Note that by [[Subset of Finite Set is Finite]], $\map \supp f$ is indeed [[Definition:Finite Set|finite]]. The result now follows from: * [[Sum over Complement of Finite Set]] * [[Sum of Zero over Finite Set]] * [[Identity Element of Addition on Numbers]] {{qed}}
Summation over Finite Set Equals Summation over Support
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_over_Finite_Set_Equals_Summation_over_Support
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_over_Finite_Set_Equals_Summation_over_Support
[ "Summations" ]
[ "Definition:Number", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Support of Mapping to Algebraic Structure", "Definition:Summation", "Definition:Finite Set" ]
[ "Subset of Finite Set is Finite", "Definition:Finite Set", "Sum over Complement of Finite Set", "Summation of Zero/Finite Set", "Identity Element of Addition on Numbers" ]
proofwiki-13667
Summation of Zero/Indexed Summation
Let $a, b$ be integers. Let $\closedint a b$ denote the integer interval between $a$ and $b$. Let $f_0 : \closedint a b \to \mathbb A$ be the zero mapping. Then the indexed summation of $0$ from $a$ to $b$ equals zero: :$\ds \sum_{i \mathop = a}^b \map {f_0} i = 0$
At least three proofs are possible: * by induction, using Identity Element of Addition on Numbers * using Indexed Summation of Multiple of Mapping * using Indexed Summation of Sum of Mappings {{ProofWanted}} Category:Summations drp3mu7oymvpogx6al6gdb0lpczczok
Let $a, b$ be [[Definition:Integer|integers]]. Let $\closedint a b$ denote the [[Definition:Integer Interval|integer interval]] between $a$ and $b$. Let $f_0 : \closedint a b \to \mathbb A$ be the [[Definition:Zero Mapping|zero mapping]]. Then the [[Definition:Indexed Summation|indexed summation]] of $0$ from $a$ t...
At least three proofs are possible: * by induction, using [[Identity Element of Addition on Numbers]] * using [[Indexed Summation of Multiple of Mapping]] * using [[Indexed Summation of Sum of Mappings]] {{ProofWanted}} [[Category:Summations]] drp3mu7oymvpogx6al6gdb0lpczczok
Summation of Zero/Indexed Summation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_of_Zero/Indexed_Summation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_of_Zero/Indexed_Summation
[ "Summations" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Closed Interval/Integer Interval", "Definition:Zero Mapping", "Definition:Summation/Indexed", "Definition:Zero (Number)" ]
[ "Identity Element of Addition on Numbers", "Indexed Summation of Multiple of Mapping", "Indexed Summation of Sum of Mappings", "Category:Summations" ]
proofwiki-13668
Summation of Zero/Finite Set
Let $S$ be a finite set. Let $0 : S \to \mathbb A$ be the zero mapping. {{explain|Presumably the above is a constant mapping on $0$ -- needs to be made explicit.}} Then the summation of $0$ over $S$ equals zero: :$\ds \sum_{s \mathop \in S} 0 \left({s}\right) = 0$
At least three proofs are possible: :using the definition of summation and Indexed Summation of Zero :using Indexed Summation of Sum of Mappings :using Summation of Multiple of Mapping on Finite Set. {{ProofWanted}} Category:Summations h5knszknmzvjg820yqugvmdcw8um0sv
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Finite Set|finite set]]. Let $0 : S \to \mathbb A$ be the [[Definition:Zero Mapping|zero mapping]]. {{explain|Presumably the above is a [[Definition:Constant Mapping|constant mapping]] on $0$ -- needs to be made explicit.}} Then the [[Definition:Summation|summation]] of $0$ over $S$ equals...
At least three proofs are possible: :using the definition of [[Definition:Summation|summation]] and [[Indexed Summation of Zero]] :using [[Indexed Summation of Sum of Mappings]] :using [[Summation of Multiple of Mapping on Finite Set]]. {{ProofWanted}} [[Category:Summations]] h5knszknmzvjg820yqugvmdcw8um0sv
Summation of Zero/Finite Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_of_Zero/Finite_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_of_Zero/Finite_Set
[ "Summations" ]
[ "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Zero Mapping", "Definition:Constant Mapping", "Definition:Summation", "Definition:Zero (Number)" ]
[ "Definition:Summation", "Summation of Zero/Indexed Summation", "Indexed Summation of Sum of Mappings", "Summation of Multiple of Mapping on Finite Set", "Category:Summations" ]
proofwiki-13669
Summation of Zero/Set
Let $S$ be a set. Let $0: S \to \mathbb A$ be the zero mapping. Then the summation with finite support of $0$ over $S$ equals zero: :$\ds \sum_{s \mathop \in S} \map 0 s = 0$
By Support of Zero Mapping, the support of $0$ is empty. By Empty Set is Finite, the support of $0$ is indeed finite. By Summation over Empty Set: :$\ds \sum_{s \mathop \in S} \map 0 s = \sum_{s \mathop \in \O} \map 0 s = 0$ {{qed}} Category:Summations 7euo1h4t8r8qpdusxsnkr2bmrj3ezg6
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. Let $0: S \to \mathbb A$ be the [[Definition:Zero Mapping|zero mapping]]. Then the [[Definition:Summation over Set with Finite Support|summation with finite support]] of $0$ over $S$ equals [[Definition:Zero of Standard Number System|zero]]: :$\ds \sum_{s \mathop \in S} \map 0 s ...
By [[Support of Zero Mapping]], the [[Definition:Support of Mapping to Algebraic Structure|support]] of $0$ is [[Definition:Empty Set|empty]]. By [[Empty Set is Finite]], the [[Definition:Support of Mapping to Algebraic Structure|support]] of $0$ is indeed [[Definition:Finite Set|finite]]. By [[Summation over Empty S...
Summation of Zero/Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_of_Zero/Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_of_Zero/Set
[ "Summations" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Zero Mapping", "Definition:Summation/Finite Support", "Definition:Zero (Number)" ]
[ "Support of Zero Mapping", "Definition:Support of Mapping to Algebraic Structure", "Definition:Empty Set", "Empty Set is Finite", "Definition:Support of Mapping to Algebraic Structure", "Definition:Finite Set", "Summation over Empty Set", "Category:Summations" ]
proofwiki-13670
Exchange of Order of Summations over Finite Sets/Subset of Cartesian Product
Let $D\subset S \times T$ be a subset. Let $\pi_1 : D \to S$ and $\pi_2 : D \to T$ be the restrictions of the projections of $S\times T$. Then we have an equality of summations over finite sets: :$\ds \sum_{s \mathop \in S} \sum_{t \mathop \in \map {\pi_2} {\map {\pi_1^{-1} } s} } \map f {s, t} = \sum_{t \mathop \in T}...
Define an extension $\overline f$ of $f$ to $S \times T$ by: :$\map {\overline f} {s, t} = \begin{cases} \map f {s, t} & : \tuple {s, t} \in D \\ 0 & : \tuple {s, t} \notin D \end{cases}$ Then for all $s \in S$, by: :Preimage of Disjoint Union is Disjoint Union :Sum over Disjoint Union of Finite Sets :Summation over Fi...
Let $D\subset S \times T$ be a [[Definition:Subset|subset]]. Let $\pi_1 : D \to S$ and $\pi_2 : D \to T$ be the [[Definition:Restriction of Mapping|restrictions]] of the [[Definition:Projection from Cartesian Product|projections]] of $S\times T$. Then we have an equality of [[Definition:Summation|summations]] over [...
Define an [[Definition:Extension of Mapping|extension]] $\overline f$ of $f$ to $S \times T$ by: :$\map {\overline f} {s, t} = \begin{cases} \map f {s, t} & : \tuple {s, t} \in D \\ 0 & : \tuple {s, t} \notin D \end{cases}$ Then for all $s \in S$, by: :[[Preimage of Disjoint Union is Disjoint Union]] :[[Sum over Disj...
Exchange of Order of Summations over Finite Sets/Subset of Cartesian Product
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Exchange_of_Order_of_Summations_over_Finite_Sets/Subset_of_Cartesian_Product
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Exchange_of_Order_of_Summations_over_Finite_Sets/Subset_of_Cartesian_Product
[ "Summations" ]
[ "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Restriction/Mapping", "Definition:Projection from Cartesian Product", "Definition:Summation", "Definition:Finite Set" ]
[ "Definition:Extension of Mapping", "Preimage of Disjoint Union is Disjoint Union", "Sum over Disjoint Union of Finite Sets", "Summation of Zero/Finite Set", "Exchange of Order of Summations over Finite Sets/Cartesian Product", "Category:Summations" ]
proofwiki-13671
Algebra Defined by Ring Homomorphism on Ring with Unity is Unitary
Let $R$ be a commutative ring. Let $\struct {S, +, *}$ be a ring with unity. Let $f: R \to S$ be a ring homomorphism. Let $\struct {S_R, *}$ be the algebra defined by the ring homomorphism $f$. Then $\struct {S_R, *}$ is a unitary algebra.
By definition, the multiplication of $\struct {S_R, *}$ is the ring product of $S$. Thus it follows immediately from the fact that $S$ is a ring with unity, that $\struct {S_R, *}$ is a unitary algebra. {{qed}} Category:Algebras Category:Unital Algebras 3ecweu0z3ty2ohlojp54ic7qg4wpq4n
Let $R$ be a [[Definition:Commutative Ring|commutative ring]]. Let $\struct {S, +, *}$ be a [[Definition:Ring with Unity|ring with unity]]. Let $f: R \to S$ be a [[Definition:Ring Homomorphism|ring homomorphism]]. Let $\struct {S_R, *}$ be the [[Definition:Algebra Defined by Ring Homomorphism|algebra defined by the ...
By definition, the [[Definition:Multiplication of Algebra|multiplication]] of $\struct {S_R, *}$ is the [[Definition:Ring Product|ring product]] of $S$. Thus it follows immediately from the fact that $S$ is a [[Definition:Ring with Unity|ring with unity]], that $\struct {S_R, *}$ is a [[Definition:Unitary Algebra|unit...
Algebra Defined by Ring Homomorphism on Ring with Unity is Unitary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Algebra_Defined_by_Ring_Homomorphism_on_Ring_with_Unity_is_Unitary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Algebra_Defined_by_Ring_Homomorphism_on_Ring_with_Unity_is_Unitary
[ "Algebras", "Unital Algebras" ]
[ "Definition:Commutative Ring", "Definition:Ring with Unity", "Definition:Ring Homomorphism", "Definition:Algebra Defined by Ring Homomorphism", "Definition:Unital Algebra" ]
[ "Definition:Multiplication of Algebra", "Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)/Product", "Definition:Ring with Unity", "Definition:Unital Algebra", "Category:Algebras", "Category:Unital Algebras" ]
proofwiki-13672
Algebra Defined by Ring Homomorphism is Associative
Let $R$ be a commutative ring. Let $\struct {S, +, *}$ be a ring with unity. Let $f: R \to S$ be a ring homomorphism. Let the image of $f$ be a subset of the center of $S$. Let $\struct {S_R, *}$ be the algebra defined by the ring homomorphism $f$. Then $\struct {S_R, *}$ is an associative algebra.
By definition, the multiplication of $\struct {S_R, *}$ is the ring product of $S$. Thus it follows immediately from the fact that $S$ is a ring, that $\struct {S_R, *}$ is an associative algebra. {{qed}}
Let $R$ be a [[Definition:Commutative Ring|commutative ring]]. Let $\struct {S, +, *}$ be a [[Definition:Ring with Unity|ring with unity]]. Let $f: R \to S$ be a [[Definition:Ring Homomorphism|ring homomorphism]]. Let the [[Definition:Image of Set under Mapping|image]] of $f$ be a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of the...
By definition, the [[Definition:Multiplication of Algebra|multiplication]] of $\struct {S_R, *}$ is the [[Definition:Ring Product|ring product]] of $S$. Thus it follows immediately from the fact that $S$ is a [[Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)|ring]], that $\struct {S_R, *}$ is an [[Definition:Associative Algebra|as...
Algebra Defined by Ring Homomorphism is Associative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Algebra_Defined_by_Ring_Homomorphism_is_Associative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Algebra_Defined_by_Ring_Homomorphism_is_Associative
[ "Algebras", "Associative Algebras" ]
[ "Definition:Commutative Ring", "Definition:Ring with Unity", "Definition:Ring Homomorphism", "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Subset", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Center (Abstract Algebra)/Ring", "Definition:Algebra Defined by Ring Homomorphism", "Definition:Associative Algebra" ]
[ "Definition:Multiplication of Algebra", "Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)/Product", "Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Associative Algebra" ]
proofwiki-13673
Algebra Defined by Ring Homomorphism on Commutative Ring is Commutative
Let $R$ be a commutative ring. Let $\struct {S, +, *}$ be a commutative ring. Let $f: R \to S$ be a ring homomorphism. Let $\struct {S_R, *}$ be the algebra defined by the ring homomorphism $f$. Then $\struct {S_R, *}$ is a commutative algebra.
Note that by Center of Commutative Ring, the image of $f$ is indeed a subset of the center of $S$. By definition, the multiplication of $\struct {S_R, *}$ is the ring product of $S$. Thus it follows immediately from the fact that $S$ is a ring, that $\struct {S_R, *}$ is a commutative algebra. {{qed}}
Let $R$ be a [[Definition:Commutative Ring|commutative ring]]. Let $\struct {S, +, *}$ be a [[Definition:Commutative Ring|commutative ring]]. Let $f: R \to S$ be a [[Definition:Ring Homomorphism|ring homomorphism]]. Let $\struct {S_R, *}$ be the [[Definition:Algebra Defined by Ring Homomorphism|algebra defined by th...
Note that by [[Center of Commutative Ring]], the [[Definition:Image of Set under Mapping|image]] of $f$ is indeed a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of the [[Definition:Center of Ring|center]] of $S$. By definition, the [[Definition:Multiplication of Algebra|multiplication]] of $\struct {S_R, *}$ is the [[Definition:Ring ...
Algebra Defined by Ring Homomorphism on Commutative Ring is Commutative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Algebra_Defined_by_Ring_Homomorphism_on_Commutative_Ring_is_Commutative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Algebra_Defined_by_Ring_Homomorphism_on_Commutative_Ring_is_Commutative
[ "Algebras", "Commutative Algebras" ]
[ "Definition:Commutative Ring", "Definition:Commutative Ring", "Definition:Ring Homomorphism", "Definition:Algebra Defined by Ring Homomorphism", "Definition:Commutative Algebra (Abstract Algebra)" ]
[ "Center of Commutative Ring", "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Subset", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Center (Abstract Algebra)/Ring", "Definition:Multiplication of Algebra", "Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)/Product", "Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Commutative Algebra (A...
proofwiki-13674
Smallest Integer which is Sum of 3 Sixth Powers in 2 Ways
The smallest positive integer which can be expressed as the sum of $3$ sixth powers in $2$ different ways is: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 160 \, 426 \, 514 | r = 3^6 + 19^6 + 22^6 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 10^6 + 15^6 + 23^6 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} Also note that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 854 | r = 3^2...
We have that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 160 \, 426 \, 514 | r = 729 + 47 \, 045 \, 881 + 113 \, 379 \, 904 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 3^6 + 19^6 + 22^6 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 160 \, 426 \, 514 | r = 1 \, 000 \, 000 + 11 \, 390 \, 625 + 148 \, 035 \, 889 | c = }} {{eqn ...
The smallest [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integer]] which can be expressed as the [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of $3$ [[Definition:Sixth Power|sixth powers]] in $2$ different ways is: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 160 \, 426 \, 514 | r = 3^6 + 19^6 + 22^6 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 10^6 + 15^6 + 23...
We have that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 160 \, 426 \, 514 | r = 729 + 47 \, 045 \, 881 + 113 \, 379 \, 904 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 3^6 + 19^6 + 22^6 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 160 \, 426 \, 514 | r = 1 \, 000 \, 000 + 11 \, 390 \, 625 + 148 \, 035 \, 889 | c = }} {{e...
Smallest Integer which is Sum of 3 Sixth Powers in 2 Ways
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smallest_Integer_which_is_Sum_of_3_Sixth_Powers_in_2_Ways
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smallest_Integer_which_is_Sum_of_3_Sixth_Powers_in_2_Ways
[ "Sixth Powers", "160,426,514" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Sixth Power" ]
[]
proofwiki-13675
Infinite Number of Integers which are Sum of 3 Sixth Powers in 2 Ways
There exist an infinite number of positive integers which can be expressed as the sum of $3$ sixth powers in $2$ different ways.
There are many parametric solutions to $x^6 + y^6 + z^6 = u^6 + v^6 + w^6$. One is given by: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | r = 2 m^4 + 4 m^3 n - 5 m^2 n^2 - 12 m n^3 - 9 n^4 }} {{eqn | l = y | r = 3 m^4 + 9 m^3 n + 18 m^2 n^2 + 21 m n^3 + 9 n^4 }} {{eqn | l = z | r = -m^4 - 10 m^3 n - 17 m^2 n^2 - 12 ...
There exist an [[Definition:Infinite Set|infinite number]] of [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integers]] which can be expressed as the [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of $3$ [[Definition:Sixth Power|sixth powers]] in $2$ different ways.
There are many parametric solutions to $x^6 + y^6 + z^6 = u^6 + v^6 + w^6$. One is given by: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | r = 2 m^4 + 4 m^3 n - 5 m^2 n^2 - 12 m n^3 - 9 n^4 }} {{eqn | l = y | r = 3 m^4 + 9 m^3 n + 18 m^2 n^2 + 21 m n^3 + 9 n^4 }} {{eqn | l = z | r = -m^4 - 10 m^3 n - 17 m^2 n^2 - 12...
Infinite Number of Integers which are Sum of 3 Sixth Powers in 2 Ways
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Infinite_Number_of_Integers_which_are_Sum_of_3_Sixth_Powers_in_2_Ways
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Infinite_Number_of_Integers_which_are_Sum_of_3_Sixth_Powers_in_2_Ways
[ "Sixth Powers", "160,426,514" ]
[ "Definition:Infinite Set", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Sixth Power" ]
[]
proofwiki-13676
Consecutive Primes of form 4n+1
The sequence of $16$ consecutive prime numbers beginning from $207 \, 622 \, 273$ are all of the form $4 n + 1$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | l = 207 \, 622 \, 273 | r = 4 \times 51 \, 905 \, 568 + 1 | c = and is the $11 \, 477 \, 482$nd prime }} {{eqn | n = 2 | l = 207 \, 622 \, 297 | r = 4 \times 51 \, 905 \, 574 + 1 | c = and is the $11 \, 477 \, 483$rd prime }} {{eqn | n = 3 | l = 20...
The [[Definition:Integer Sequence|sequence]] of $16$ consecutive [[Definition:Prime Number|prime numbers]] beginning from $207 \, 622 \, 273$ are all of the form $4 n + 1$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | l = 207 \, 622 \, 273 | r = 4 \times 51 \, 905 \, 568 + 1 | c = and is the $11 \, 477 \, 482$nd [[Definition:Prime Number|prime]] }} {{eqn | n = 2 | l = 207 \, 622 \, 297 | r = 4 \times 51 \, 905 \, 574 + 1 | c = and is the $11 \, 477 \, 483$rd [[Definit...
Consecutive Primes of form 4n+1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Consecutive_Primes_of_form_4n+1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Consecutive_Primes_of_form_4n+1
[ "Prime Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Integer Sequence", "Definition:Prime Number" ]
[ "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number",...
proofwiki-13677
Integer which is Sum of 3 Fourth Powers in 2 Ways and Products of Those Roots
The positive integer $256 \, 103 \, 393$ can be expressed as the sum of $3$ fourth powers in $2$ different ways: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 256 \, 103 \, 393 | r = 22^4 + 93^4 + 116^4 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 29^4 + 66^4 + 124^4 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} Also note that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 237 \, 336 ...
We have that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 256 \, 103 \, 393 | r = 234 \, 256 + 74 \, 805 \, 201 + 181 \, 063 \, 936 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 22^4 + 93^4 + 116^4 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 256 \, 103 \, 393 | r = 707 \, 281 + 18 \, 974 \, 736 + 236 \, 421 \, 376 | c = }} {{...
The [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integer]] $256 \, 103 \, 393$ can be expressed as the [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of $3$ [[Definition:Fourth Power|fourth powers]] in $2$ different ways: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 256 \, 103 \, 393 | r = 22^4 + 93^4 + 116^4 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 29^4 + 66^...
We have that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 256 \, 103 \, 393 | r = 234 \, 256 + 74 \, 805 \, 201 + 181 \, 063 \, 936 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 22^4 + 93^4 + 116^4 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 256 \, 103 \, 393 | r = 707 \, 281 + 18 \, 974 \, 736 + 236 \, 421 \, 376 | c = }}...
Integer which is Sum of 3 Fourth Powers in 2 Ways and Products of Those Roots
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integer_which_is_Sum_of_3_Fourth_Powers_in_2_Ways_and_Products_of_Those_Roots
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integer_which_is_Sum_of_3_Fourth_Powers_in_2_Ways_and_Products_of_Those_Roots
[ "Fourth Powers", "256,103,393" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Fourth Power" ]
[]
proofwiki-13678
Groups of Order 8
Let $G$ be a group of order $8$. Then $G$ is isomorphic to one of the following: :$\Z_8$ :$\Z_4 \oplus \Z_2$ :$\Z_2 \oplus \Z_2 \oplus \Z_2$ :$D_4$ :$\Dic 2$ where: :$\Z_n$ is the cyclic group of order $n$ :$D_4$ is the dihedral group of order $8$ :$\Dic 2$ is the dicyclic group of order $8$, also known as the quaterni...
The abelian cases are handled by {{Corollary|Abelian Group Factored by Prime}}. {{qed|lemma}} Let $G$ be non-abelian. By Lagrange's Theorem the order of non-identity elements in $G$ is either $2$, $4$ or $8$. {{AimForCont}} that there exists an order $8$ element. Then $G$ is generated by this element. So $G$ is by defi...
Let $G$ be a [[Definition:Group|group]] of [[Definition:Order of Group|order]] $8$. Then $G$ is [[Definition:Group Isomorphism|isomorphic]] to one of the following: :$\Z_8$ :$\Z_4 \oplus \Z_2$ :$\Z_2 \oplus \Z_2 \oplus \Z_2$ :$D_4$ :$\Dic 2$ where: :$\Z_n$ is the [[Definition:Cyclic Group|cyclic group]] of order $n...
The [[Definition:Abelian Group|abelian]] cases are handled by {{Corollary|Abelian Group Factored by Prime}}. {{qed|lemma}} Let $G$ be non-[[Definition:Abelian Group|abelian]]. By [[Lagrange's Theorem (Group Theory)|Lagrange's Theorem]] the [[Definition:Order of Group Element|order]] of non-[[Definition:Identity Elem...
Groups of Order 8
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Groups_of_Order_8
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Groups_of_Order_8
[ "Order of Groups", "Groups of Order 8" ]
[ "Definition:Group", "Definition:Order of Structure", "Definition:Isomorphism (Abstract Algebra)/Group Isomorphism", "Definition:Cyclic Group", "Definition:Dihedral Group", "Definition:Dicyclic Group", "Definition:Dicyclic Group/Quaternion Group" ]
[ "Definition:Abelian Group", "Definition:Abelian Group", "Lagrange's Theorem (Group Theory)", "Definition:Order of Group Element", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity", "Definition:Order of Group Element", "Definition:Generated Subgroup", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Cycli...
proofwiki-13679
Triangular Numbers which are Product of 3 Consecutive Integers
The $6$ triangular numbers which can be expressed as the product of $3$ consecutive integers are: :$6, 120, 210, 990, 185 \, 836, 258 \, 474 \, 216$ {{OEIS|A001219}}
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = T_3 | r = \frac {3 \left({3 + 1}\right)} 2 | c = Closed Form for Triangular Numbers }} {{eqn | r = 6 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 1 \times 2 \times 3 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = T_{15} | r = \frac {15 \left({15 + 1}\right)} 2 | c = Closed Form f...
The $6$ [[Definition:Triangular Number|triangular numbers]] which can be expressed as the [[Definition:Integer Multiplication|product]] of $3$ consecutive [[Definition:Integer|integers]] are: :$6, 120, 210, 990, 185 \, 836, 258 \, 474 \, 216$ {{OEIS|A001219}}
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = T_3 | r = \frac {3 \left({3 + 1}\right)} 2 | c = [[Closed Form for Triangular Numbers]] }} {{eqn | r = 6 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 1 \times 2 \times 3 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = T_{15} | r = \frac {15 \left({15 + 1}\right)} 2 | c = [[Close...
Triangular Numbers which are Product of 3 Consecutive Integers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Triangular_Numbers_which_are_Product_of_3_Consecutive_Integers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Triangular_Numbers_which_are_Product_of_3_Consecutive_Integers
[ "Triangular Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Triangular Number", "Definition:Multiplication/Integers", "Definition:Integer" ]
[ "Closed Form for Triangular Numbers", "Closed Form for Triangular Numbers", "Closed Form for Triangular Numbers", "Closed Form for Triangular Numbers", "Closed Form for Triangular Numbers", "Closed Form for Triangular Numbers" ]
proofwiki-13680
First Harmonic Number to exceed 20
The first harmonic number that is greater than $20$ is $H_{272 \, 400 \, 600}$. That is, the number of terms of the harmonic series required for its partial sum to exceed $20$ is $272 \, 400 \, 600$.
We have: :$H_{272 \, 400 \, 599} = \ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^{272 \, 400 \, 599} \frac 1 k \approx 19 \cdotp 99999 \, 99979$ and: :$H_{272 \, 400 \, 600} = \ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^{272 \, 400 \, 600} \frac 1 k \approx 20 \cdotp 00000 \, 00016$
The first [[Definition:Harmonic Number|harmonic number]] that is greater than $20$ is $H_{272 \, 400 \, 600}$. That is, the number of [[Definition:Term of Sequence|terms]] of the [[Definition:Harmonic Series|harmonic series]] required for its [[Definition:Partial Sum|partial sum]] to exceed $20$ is $272 \, 400 \, 600$...
We have: :$H_{272 \, 400 \, 599} = \ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^{272 \, 400 \, 599} \frac 1 k \approx 19 \cdotp 99999 \, 99979$ and: :$H_{272 \, 400 \, 600} = \ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^{272 \, 400 \, 600} \frac 1 k \approx 20 \cdotp 00000 \, 00016$
First Harmonic Number to exceed 20
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/First_Harmonic_Number_to_exceed_20
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/First_Harmonic_Number_to_exceed_20
[ "Harmonic Numbers", "272,400,600" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Numbers", "Definition:Term of Sequence", "Definition:Harmonic Series", "Definition:Series/Sequence of Partial Sums" ]
[]
proofwiki-13681
First Harmonic Number to exceed 10
The first harmonic number that is greater than $10$ is $H_{12 \, 367}$. That is, the number of terms of the harmonic series required for its partial sum to exceed $10$ is $12 \, 367$.
We have: :$H_{12 \, 366} = \ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^{12 \, 366} \frac 1 k \approx 9 \cdotp 99996 \, 214$ and: :$H_{12 \, 367} = \ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^{12 \, 367} \frac 1 k \approx 10 \cdotp 00004 \, 30083$
The first [[Definition:Harmonic Number|harmonic number]] that is greater than $10$ is $H_{12 \, 367}$. That is, the number of [[Definition:Term of Sequence|terms]] of the [[Definition:Harmonic Series|harmonic series]] required for its [[Definition:Partial Sum|partial sum]] to exceed $10$ is $12 \, 367$.
We have: :$H_{12 \, 366} = \ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^{12 \, 366} \frac 1 k \approx 9 \cdotp 99996 \, 214$ and: :$H_{12 \, 367} = \ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^{12 \, 367} \frac 1 k \approx 10 \cdotp 00004 \, 30083$
First Harmonic Number to exceed 10
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/First_Harmonic_Number_to_exceed_10
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/First_Harmonic_Number_to_exceed_10
[ "Harmonic Numbers", "12,367" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Numbers", "Definition:Term of Sequence", "Definition:Harmonic Series", "Definition:Series/Sequence of Partial Sums" ]
[]
proofwiki-13682
Canonical Homomorphism to Polynomial Ring is Ring Monomorphism
Let $R$ be a commutative ring with unity. Let $\struct {R \sqbrk X, \iota, X}$ be a polynomial ring over $R$ in one indeterminate $X$. Then the canonical homomorphism $\iota : R \to R \sqbrk X$ is a ring monomorphism.
Let $\operatorname{id} : R \to R$ be the identity mapping. Let $1$ be the unity of $R$. By Identity Mapping is Ring Automorphism, $\operatorname{id}$ is a ring homomorphism. By Universal Property of Polynomial Ring, there exists a ring homomorphism $h : R \sqbrk X \to R$ with $h \circ \iota = \operatorname{id}$. By Ide...
Let $R$ be a [[Definition:Commutative Ring with Unity|commutative ring with unity]]. Let $\struct {R \sqbrk X, \iota, X}$ be a [[Definition:Polynomial Ring in one Indeterminate|polynomial ring]] over $R$ in one [[Definition:Indeterminate of Polynomial Ring|indeterminate]] $X$. Then the [[Definition:Embedding into Po...
Let $\operatorname{id} : R \to R$ be the [[Definition:Identity Mapping|identity mapping]]. Let $1$ be the [[Definition:Unity of Ring|unity]] of $R$. By [[Identity Mapping is Ring Automorphism]], $\operatorname{id}$ is a [[Definition:Ring Homomorphism|ring homomorphism]]. By [[Universal Property of Polynomial Ring]],...
Canonical Homomorphism to Polynomial Ring is Ring Monomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Canonical_Homomorphism_to_Polynomial_Ring_is_Ring_Monomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Canonical_Homomorphism_to_Polynomial_Ring_is_Ring_Monomorphism
[ "Polynomial Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Commutative and Unitary Ring", "Definition:Polynomial Ring", "Definition:Polynomial Ring/Indeterminate", "Definition:Polynomial Ring/Embedding", "Definition:Ring Monomorphism" ]
[ "Definition:Identity Mapping", "Definition:Unity (Abstract Algebra)/Ring", "Identity Mapping is Automorphism/Rings", "Definition:Ring Homomorphism", "Universal Property of Polynomial Ring", "Definition:Ring Homomorphism", "Identity Mapping is Injection", "Definition:Injection", "Injection if Composi...
proofwiki-13683
Universal Property of Field of Rational Fractions
Let $R$ be an integral domain. Let $\struct {\map R x, \iota, x}$ be the field of rational fractions over $R$. Let $\struct {K, f, a}$ be an ordered triple, where: :$K$ is a field :$f : R \to K$ is a unital ring homomorphism :$a$ is a transcendental element of $K$. Then there exists a unique unital ring homomorphism $\...
Use Universal Property of Polynomial Ring and Universal Poperty of Field of Fractions. {{ProofWanted}} Category:Polynomial Theory Category:Universal Properties hj182iw7n4d1b25r40gnv4qd4f2848d
Let $R$ be an [[Definition:Integral Domain|integral domain]]. Let $\struct {\map R x, \iota, x}$ be the [[Definition:Field of Rational Fractions|field of rational fractions]] over $R$. Let $\struct {K, f, a}$ be an [[Definition:Ordered Triple|ordered triple]], where: :$K$ is a [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|fi...
Use [[Universal Property of Polynomial Ring]] and [[Universal Poperty of Field of Fractions]]. {{ProofWanted}} [[Category:Polynomial Theory]] [[Category:Universal Properties]] hj182iw7n4d1b25r40gnv4qd4f2848d
Universal Property of Field of Rational Fractions
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Universal_Property_of_Field_of_Rational_Fractions
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Universal_Property_of_Field_of_Rational_Fractions
[ "Polynomial Theory", "Universal Properties" ]
[ "Definition:Integral Domain", "Definition:Field of Rational Fractions", "Definition:Ordered Tuple as Ordered Set/Ordered Triple", "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Unital Ring Homomorphism", "Definition:Transcendental Element of Algebra over Ring", "Definition:Unique", "Definition:Uni...
[ "Universal Property of Polynomial Ring", "Universal Poperty of Field of Fractions", "Category:Polynomial Theory", "Category:Universal Properties" ]
proofwiki-13684
Equivalence of Definitions of Unital Subalgebra
Let $R$ be a commutative ring. Let $\struct {A_R, *}$ be an unital algebra over $R$ whose unit is $1_A$. Let $\struct {B_R, *}$ be a subalgebra of $A_R$. {{TFAE|def = Unital Subalgebra}}
{{ProofWanted}} Category:Unital Subalgebras 3hdv92dy2uskggb8ofcf5dd6n3aobr7
Let $R$ be a [[Definition:Commutative Ring|commutative ring]]. Let $\struct {A_R, *}$ be an [[Definition:Unital Algebra|unital algebra]] over $R$ whose [[Definition:Unit of Algebra|unit]] is $1_A$. Let $\struct {B_R, *}$ be a [[Definition:Subalgebra|subalgebra]] of $A_R$. {{TFAE|def = Unital Subalgebra}}
{{ProofWanted}} [[Category:Unital Subalgebras]] 3hdv92dy2uskggb8ofcf5dd6n3aobr7
Equivalence of Definitions of Unital Subalgebra
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Unital_Subalgebra
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Unital_Subalgebra
[ "Unital Subalgebras" ]
[ "Definition:Commutative Ring", "Definition:Unital Algebra", "Definition:Unit of Algebra", "Definition:Subalgebra" ]
[ "Category:Unital Subalgebras" ]
proofwiki-13685
Polydivisible Number/Examples/381,654,729
The integer $381 \, 654 \, 729$ is the only polydivisible number which is penholodigital.
First it is demonstrated that indeed $381 \, 654 \, 729$ has this property: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 3 | r = 1 \times 3 }} {{eqn | l = 38 | r = 2 \times 19 }} {{eqn | l = 381 | r = 3 \times 127 }} {{eqn | l = 3816 | r = 4 \times 954 }} {{eqn | l = 38 \, 165 | r = 5 \times 7633 }} {{eqn | ...
The [[Definition:Integer|integer]] $381 \, 654 \, 729$ is the only [[Definition:Polydivisible Number|polydivisible number]] which is [[Definition:Penholodigital Integer|penholodigital]].
First it is demonstrated that indeed $381 \, 654 \, 729$ has this property: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 3 | r = 1 \times 3 }} {{eqn | l = 38 | r = 2 \times 19 }} {{eqn | l = 381 | r = 3 \times 127 }} {{eqn | l = 3816 | r = 4 \times 954 }} {{eqn | l = 38 \, 165 | r = 5 \times 7633 }} {{eqn |...
Polydivisible Number/Examples/381,654,729
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Polydivisible_Number/Examples/381,654,729
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Polydivisible_Number/Examples/381,654,729
[ "Polydivisible Numbers", "Penholodigital Integers", "381,654,729" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Polydivisible Number", "Definition:Pandigital Set/Penholodigital/Integer" ]
[ "Definition:Polydivisible Number", "Definition:Pandigital Set/Penholodigital/Integer", "Divisibility by 5", "Divisibility by 2", "Definition:Even Integer", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Divisibility by 9/Corollary", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Divisibility by 8", "Definition:Divisor (Alg...
proofwiki-13686
Pandigital Product of Pandigital Pairs in 3 Ways
The pandigital integer $0 \, 429 \, 315 \, 678$ can be expressed as the product of a pandigital doubleton in $3$ different ways: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 0 \, 429 \, 315 \, 678 | r = 04 \, 926 \times 87 \, 153 }} {{eqn | r = 07 \, 923 \times 54 \, 186}} {{eqn | r = 15 \, 846 \times 27 \, 093}} {{end-eqn}}
We have that: :$0 \, 429 \, 315 \, 678 = 2 \times 3^2 \times 11 \times 19 \times 139 \times 821$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 04 \, 926 \times 87 \, 153 | r = \paren {2 \times 3 \times 821} \times \paren {3 \times 11 \times 19 \times 139} }} {{eqn | l = 07 \, 923 \times 54 \, 186 | r = \paren {3 \times 1...
The [[Definition:Pandigital Integer|pandigital integer]] $0 \, 429 \, 315 \, 678$ can be expressed as the [[Definition:Integer Multiplication|product]] of a [[Definition:Pandigital Set|pandigital]] [[Definition:Doubleton|doubleton]] in $3$ different ways: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 0 \, 429 \, 315 \, 678 | r = 0...
We have that: :$0 \, 429 \, 315 \, 678 = 2 \times 3^2 \times 11 \times 19 \times 139 \times 821$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 04 \, 926 \times 87 \, 153 | r = \paren {2 \times 3 \times 821} \times \paren {3 \times 11 \times 19 \times 139} }} {{eqn | l = 07 \, 923 \times 54 \, 186 | r = \paren {3 \times...
Pandigital Product of Pandigital Pairs in 3 Ways
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Pandigital_Product_of_Pandigital_Pairs_in_3_Ways
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Pandigital_Product_of_Pandigital_Pairs_in_3_Ways
[ "Pandigital Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Pandigital Set/Integer", "Definition:Multiplication/Integers", "Definition:Pandigital Set", "Definition:Doubleton" ]
[]
proofwiki-13687
Smallest Positive Integer which is Sum of 2 Fourth Powers in 2 Ways
The smallest positive integer which can be expressed as the sum of $2$ fourth powers in $2$ different ways is: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 635 \, 318 \, 657 | r = 59^4 + 158^4 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 133^4 + 134^4 | c = }} {{end-eqn}}
The fact that these are the smallest can be demonstrated by calculation. {{qed}}
The smallest [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integer]] which can be expressed as the [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of $2$ [[Definition:Fourth Power|fourth powers]] in $2$ different ways is: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 635 \, 318 \, 657 | r = 59^4 + 158^4 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 133^4 + 134^4 ...
The fact that these are the smallest can be demonstrated by calculation. {{qed}}
Smallest Positive Integer which is Sum of 2 Fourth Powers in 2 Ways
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smallest_Positive_Integer_which_is_Sum_of_2_Fourth_Powers_in_2_Ways
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smallest_Positive_Integer_which_is_Sum_of_2_Fourth_Powers_in_2_Ways
[ "Fourth Powers", "635,318,657" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Fourth Power" ]
[]
proofwiki-13688
Largest Penholodigital Square
The largest penholodigital square is $923 \, 187 \, 456$: :$923 \, 187 \, 456 = 30 \, 384^2$
{{ProofWanted|Needs to be demonstrated that there are none higher. Could be done by checking all the squares from $30 \, 385^2$ up to $31 \, 426$ but that's too boring for now.}}
The largest [[Definition:Penholodigital Integer|penholodigital]] [[Definition:Square Number|square]] is $923 \, 187 \, 456$: :$923 \, 187 \, 456 = 30 \, 384^2$
{{ProofWanted|Needs to be demonstrated that there are none higher. Could be done by checking all the squares from $30 \, 385^2$ up to $31 \, 426$ but that's too boring for now.}}
Largest Penholodigital Square
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Largest_Penholodigital_Square
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Largest_Penholodigital_Square
[ "Square Numbers", "Penholodigital Integers", "923,187,456" ]
[ "Definition:Pandigital Set/Penholodigital/Integer", "Definition:Square Number" ]
[]
proofwiki-13689
Largest 9-Digit Prime Number
The largest prime number with $9$ digits is $999 \, 999 \, 937$.
Consider the numbers $\sqbrk {999 \, 999 \, 9ab}$. Since $999 \, 999 \, 000$ is divisible by $2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13$, if $\sqbrk {9ab}$ is divisible by these primes, so is $\sqbrk {999 \, 999 \, 9ab}$. After this elimination the only $\sqbrk {ab} > 37$ that remains are: :$41, 43, 47, 53, 61, 67, 71, 77, 83, 89, 91, 97$ We...
The largest [[Definition:Prime Number|prime number]] with $9$ [[Definition:Digit|digits]] is $999 \, 999 \, 937$.
Consider the numbers $\sqbrk {999 \, 999 \, 9ab}$. Since $999 \, 999 \, 000$ is [[Definition:Divisor|divisible]] by $2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13$, if $\sqbrk {9ab}$ is [[Definition:Divisor|divisible]] by these [[Definition:Prime Number|primes]], so is $\sqbrk {999 \, 999 \, 9ab}$. After this elimination the only $\sqbrk {ab}...
Largest 9-Digit Prime Number
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Largest_9-Digit_Prime_Number
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Largest_9-Digit_Prime_Number
[ "Specific Numbers", "999,999,937" ]
[ "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Digit" ]
[ "Definition:Divisor", "Definition:Divisor", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number" ]
proofwiki-13690
Smallest Pandigital Square
The smallest pandigital square is $1 \, 026 \, 753 \, 849$: :$1 \, 026 \, 753 \, 849 = 32 \, 043^2$
We check all the squares of numbers from $\ceiling {\sqrt {1 \, 023 \, 456 \, 789} } = 31 \, 992$ up to $32 \, 042$, with the following constraints: Since all these squares has $10$ as its two leftmost digits, the number cannot end with $0$, $1$ or $9$. A pandigital number is divisible by $9$, so our number must be div...
The smallest [[Definition:Pandigital Integer|pandigital]] [[Definition:Square Number|square]] is $1 \, 026 \, 753 \, 849$: :$1 \, 026 \, 753 \, 849 = 32 \, 043^2$
We check all the [[Definition:Square Number|squares]] of numbers from $\ceiling {\sqrt {1 \, 023 \, 456 \, 789} } = 31 \, 992$ up to $32 \, 042$, with the following constraints: Since all these [[Definition:Square Number|squares]] has $10$ as its two leftmost [[Definition:Digit|digits]], the number cannot end with $0...
Smallest Pandigital Square
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smallest_Pandigital_Square
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smallest_Pandigital_Square
[ "Square Numbers", "Pandigital Integers", "1,026,753,849" ]
[ "Definition:Pandigital Set/Integer", "Definition:Square Number" ]
[ "Definition:Square Number", "Definition:Square Number", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Pandigital Set/Integer", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Pandigital Set/Integer" ]
proofwiki-13691
Sound Proof System is Consistent
Let $\LL$ be a logical language. Let $\mathscr M$ be a formal semantics for $\LL$. Let $\mathscr P$ be a proof system for $\LL$. Suppose that $\mathscr P$ is sound for $\mathscr M$. Then $\mathscr P$ is consistent.
By assumption, some logical formula $\phi$ is not an $\mathscr M$-tautology. Since $\mathscr P$ is sound for $\mathscr M$, $\phi$ is also not a $\mathscr P$-theorem. But then by definition $\mathscr P$ is consistent. {{qed}}
Let $\LL$ be a [[Definition:Logical Language|logical language]]. Let $\mathscr M$ be a [[Definition:Formal Semantics|formal semantics]] for $\LL$. Let $\mathscr P$ be a [[Definition:Proof System|proof system]] for $\LL$. Suppose that $\mathscr P$ is [[Definition:Sound Proof System|sound]] for $\mathscr M$. Then $\...
By assumption, some [[Definition:Logical Formula|logical formula]] $\phi$ is not an $\mathscr M$-[[Definition:Tautology (Formal Semantics)|tautology]]. Since $\mathscr P$ is [[Definition:Sound Proof System|sound]] for $\mathscr M$, $\phi$ is also not a $\mathscr P$-[[Definition:Theorem (Formal Systems)|theorem]]. But...
Sound Proof System is Consistent
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sound_Proof_System_is_Consistent
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sound_Proof_System_is_Consistent
[ "Proof Systems" ]
[ "Definition:Logical Language", "Definition:Formal Semantics", "Definition:Proof System", "Definition:Sound Proof System", "Definition:Consistent (Logic)/Proof System" ]
[ "Definition:Logical Formula", "Definition:Tautology/Formal Semantics", "Definition:Sound Proof System", "Definition:Theorem/Formal System", "Definition:Consistent (Logic)/Proof System" ]
proofwiki-13692
Equivalence of Definitions of Consistent Proof System
{{TFAE|def = Consistent (Logic)/Proof System/Propositional Logic|view = Consistent Proof System for Propositional Logic}} Let $\LL_0$ be the language of propositional logic. Let $\mathscr P$ be a proof system for $\LL_0$.
=== Definition 1 implies Definition 2 === Suppose that $\neg \vdash_{\mathscr P} \phi$. Suppose additionally that there is some logical formula $\psi$ such that: :$\vdash_{\mathscr P} \psi, \neg \psi$ By the Rule of Explosion: :$\psi, \neg \psi \vdash_{\mathscr P} \phi$ By Provable Consequence of Theorems is Theorem, w...
{{TFAE|def = Consistent (Logic)/Proof System/Propositional Logic|view = Consistent Proof System for Propositional Logic}} Let $\LL_0$ be the [[Definition:Language of Propositional Logic|language of propositional logic]]. Let $\mathscr P$ be a [[Definition:Proof System|proof system]] for $\LL_0$.
=== Definition 1 implies Definition 2 === Suppose that $\neg \vdash_{\mathscr P} \phi$. Suppose additionally that there is some [[Definition:Logical Formula|logical formula]] $\psi$ such that: :$\vdash_{\mathscr P} \psi, \neg \psi$ By the [[Rule of Explosion/Variant 3|Rule of Explosion]]: :$\psi, \neg \psi \vdash_...
Equivalence of Definitions of Consistent Proof System
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Consistent_Proof_System
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Consistent_Proof_System
[ "Proof Systems", "Propositional Logic" ]
[ "Definition:Language of Propositional Logic", "Definition:Proof System" ]
[ "Definition:Logical Formula", "Rule of Explosion/Variant 3", "Provable Consequence of Theorems is Theorem" ]
proofwiki-13693
Rule of Explosion/Variant 3
:$p, \neg p \vdash q$
{{BeginTableau|p, \neg p \vdash q|Instance 2 of the Hilbert-style systems}} {{Assumption|1|p}} {{Assumption|2|\neg p}} {{TableauLine |n = 3 |f = q \implies (p \lor q) |rlnk = Definition:Hilbert Proof System/Instance 2 |rtxt = Axiom $A2$ }} {{TableauLine |n = 4 |f = \neg p \implies (q \lor \neg p) |rlnk = Definit...
:$p, \neg p \vdash q$
{{BeginTableau|p, \neg p \vdash q|[[Definition:Hilbert Proof System/Instance 2|Instance 2 of the Hilbert-style systems]]}} {{Assumption|1|p}} {{Assumption|2|\neg p}} {{TableauLine |n = 3 |f = q \implies (p \lor q) |rlnk = Definition:Hilbert Proof System/Instance 2 |rtxt = Axiom $A2$ }} {{TableauLine |n = 4 |f = \...
Rule of Explosion/Variant 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Explosion/Variant_3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Explosion/Variant_3
[ "Rule of Explosion" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Hilbert Proof System/Instance 2" ]
proofwiki-13694
Smallest Integer which is Sum of 3 Fifth Powers in 2 Ways
The smallest positive integer which can be expressed as the sum of $3$ fifth powers in $2$ different ways: The positive integer $1 \, 375 \, 298 \, 099$ can be expressed as the sum of $3$ fifth powers in $2$ different ways: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1 \, 375 \, 298 \, 099 | r = 24^5 + 28^5 + 67^5 | c = }} ...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1 \, 375 \, 298 \, 099 | r = 7 \, 962 \, 624 + 17 \, 210 \, 368 + 1 \, 350 \, 125 \, 107 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 24^5 + 28^5 + 67^5 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1 \, 375 \, 298 \, 099 | r = 243 + 459 \, 165 \, 024 + 916 \, 132 \, 832 | c = }} {{e...
The smallest [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integer]] which can be expressed as the [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of $3$ [[Definition:Fifth Power|fifth powers]] in $2$ different ways: The [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integer]] $1 \, 375 \, 298 \, 099$ can be expressed as the [[Definition:Intege...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1 \, 375 \, 298 \, 099 | r = 7 \, 962 \, 624 + 17 \, 210 \, 368 + 1 \, 350 \, 125 \, 107 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 24^5 + 28^5 + 67^5 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1 \, 375 \, 298 \, 099 | r = 243 + 459 \, 165 \, 024 + 916 \, 132 \, 832 | c = }} {...
Smallest Integer which is Sum of 3 Fifth Powers in 2 Ways
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smallest_Integer_which_is_Sum_of_3_Fifth_Powers_in_2_Ways
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smallest_Integer_which_is_Sum_of_3_Fifth_Powers_in_2_Ways
[ "Fifth Powers", "1,375,298,099" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Fifth Power", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Fifth Power" ]
[]
proofwiki-13695
Automorphic Numbers with 10 Digits
The only $10$-digit automorphic numbers are: :$1 \, 787 \, 109 \, 376$ :$8 \, 212 \, 890 \, 625$
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1 \, 787 \, 109 \, 376^2 | r = \enspace 3 \, 193 \, 759 \, 92 \mathbf {1 \, 787 \, 109 \, 376} }} {{eqn | l = 8 \, 212 \, 890 \, 625^2 | r = 67 \, 451 \, 572 \, 41 \mathbf {8 \, 212 \, 890 \, 625} }} {{end-eqn}} thus demonstrating they are automorphic. By Automorphic Numbe...
The only $10$-[[Definition:Digit|digit]] [[Definition:Automorphic Number|automorphic numbers]] are: :$1 \, 787 \, 109 \, 376$ :$8 \, 212 \, 890 \, 625$
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1 \, 787 \, 109 \, 376^2 | r = \enspace 3 \, 193 \, 759 \, 92 \mathbf {1 \, 787 \, 109 \, 376} }} {{eqn | l = 8 \, 212 \, 890 \, 625^2 | r = 67 \, 451 \, 572 \, 41 \mathbf {8 \, 212 \, 890 \, 625} }} {{end-eqn}} thus demonstrating they are [[Definition:Automorphic Number|...
Automorphic Numbers with 10 Digits
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Automorphic_Numbers_with_10_Digits
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Automorphic_Numbers_with_10_Digits
[ "Automorphic Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Automorphic Number" ]
[ "Definition:Automorphic Number", "Automorphic Numbers in Base 10" ]
proofwiki-13696
Left-Truncated Automorphic Number is Automorphic
Let $n$ be an automorphic number, expressed in some conventional number base. Let any number of digits be removed from the left-hand end of $n$. Then what remains is also an automorphic number.
Let $n$ be an automorphic number of $d$ digits, expressed in base $b$. By {{Defof|Automorphic Number}}, we have: :$n^2 \equiv n \pmod {b^d}$ Let some digits be removed from the left-hand end of $n$, so that only $d'$ digits remain. This only makes sense when $d' < d$. Define this new number as $n'$. Then we have: :$n \...
Let $n$ be an [[Definition:Automorphic Number|automorphic number]], expressed in some conventional [[Definition:Number Base|number base]]. Let any number of [[Definition:Digit|digits]] be removed from the left-hand end of $n$. Then what remains is also an [[Definition:Automorphic Number|automorphic number]].
Let $n$ be an [[Definition:Automorphic Number|automorphic number]] of $d$ [[Definition:Digit|digits]], expressed in [[Definition:Number Base|base]] $b$. By {{Defof|Automorphic Number}}, we have: :$n^2 \equiv n \pmod {b^d}$ Let some [[Definition:Digit|digits]] be removed from the left-hand end of $n$, so that only $...
Left-Truncated Automorphic Number is Automorphic
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Left-Truncated_Automorphic_Number_is_Automorphic
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Left-Truncated_Automorphic_Number_is_Automorphic
[ "Automorphic Numbers", "Left-Truncated Automorphic Number is Automorphic" ]
[ "Definition:Automorphic Number", "Definition:Number Base", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Automorphic Number" ]
[ "Definition:Automorphic Number", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Number Base", "Definition:Digit", "Congruence by Divisor of Modulus", "Congruence of Powers", "Definition:Automorphic Number", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Number Base" ]
proofwiki-13697
Square whose Divisor Sum is Cubic
The number $1 \, 857 \, 437 \, 604$ is a square number whose divisor sum is a cube.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1 \, 857 \, 437 \, 604 | r = 43 \, 098^2 | c = }} {{eqn | l = \map {\sigma_1} {1 \, 857 \, 437 \, 604} | r = 5 \, 168 \, 743 \, 489 | c = {{DSFLink|1,857,437,604|1 \, 857 \, 437 \, 604}} }} {{eqn | r = 1729^3 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
The number $1 \, 857 \, 437 \, 604$ is a [[Definition:Square Number|square number]] whose [[Definition:Divisor Sum Function|divisor sum]] is a [[Definition:Cube Number|cube]].
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1 \, 857 \, 437 \, 604 | r = 43 \, 098^2 | c = }} {{eqn | l = \map {\sigma_1} {1 \, 857 \, 437 \, 604} | r = 5 \, 168 \, 743 \, 489 | c = {{DSFLink|1,857,437,604|1 \, 857 \, 437 \, 604}} }} {{eqn | r = 1729^3 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
Square whose Divisor Sum is Cubic
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Square_whose_Divisor_Sum_is_Cubic
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Square_whose_Divisor_Sum_is_Cubic
[ "Divisor Sum Function", "Square Numbers", "Cube Numbers", "1,857,437,604", "Integers whose Divisor Sum is Cube" ]
[ "Definition:Square Number", "Definition:Divisor Sum Function", "Definition:Cube Number" ]
[]
proofwiki-13698
Largest Right-Truncatable Primes allowing 1
Let $1$ be temporarily considered to be a prime number. Under that consideration, the largest right-truncatable prime numbers are: :$1 \, 979 \, 339 \, 333$ :$1 \, 979 \, 339 \, 339$
We have that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = 1 \, 979 \, 339 \, 333 | c = is prime }} {{eqn | o = | r = 1 \, 979 \, 339 \, 339 | c = is prime }} {{end-eqn}} For both, the truncation process is the same: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = 197 \, 933 \, 933 | c = is the $10 \, 970 \, ...
Let $1$ be temporarily considered to be a [[Definition:Prime Number|prime number]]. Under that consideration, the largest [[Definition:Right-Truncatable Prime|right-truncatable]] [[Definition:Prime Number|prime numbers]] are: :$1 \, 979 \, 339 \, 333$ :$1 \, 979 \, 339 \, 339$
We have that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = 1 \, 979 \, 339 \, 333 | c = is [[Definition:Prime Number|prime]] }} {{eqn | o = | r = 1 \, 979 \, 339 \, 339 | c = is [[Definition:Prime Number|prime]] }} {{end-eqn}} For both, the truncation process is the same: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = ...
Largest Right-Truncatable Primes allowing 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Largest_Right-Truncatable_Primes_allowing_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Largest_Right-Truncatable_Primes_allowing_1
[ "Right-Truncatable Primes" ]
[ "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Right-Truncatable Prime", "Definition:Prime Number" ]
[ "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number" ...
proofwiki-13699
Completely Multiplicative Function is Multiplicative
Let $f: \Z \to \Z$ be a function on the integers $\Z$. Let $f$ be completely multiplicative. {{Questionable|Complete multiplicativity is defined for fields, but $\Z$ is not a field.}} Then $f$ is multiplicative. {{Questionable|Multiplicativity is defined for $f : \N \to \N$, undefined for $f : \Z \to \Z$}}
By definition of complete multiplicativity: :$\forall m, n \in \Z: \map f {m n} = \map f m \map f n$ Hence by True Statement is implied by Every Statement: :$\forall m, n \in \Z: m \perp n \implies \map f {m n} = \map f m \map f n$ So $f$ is multiplicative. {{qed}} Category:Number Theory Category:Completely Multiplicat...
Let $f: \Z \to \Z$ be a [[Definition:Function|function]] on the [[Definition:Integer|integers]] $\Z$. Let $f$ be [[Definition:Completely Multiplicative Function|completely multiplicative]]. {{Questionable|Complete multiplicativity is defined for fields, but $\Z$ is not a field.}} Then $f$ is [[Definition:Multiplicat...
By definition of [[Definition:Completely Multiplicative Function|complete multiplicativity]]: :$\forall m, n \in \Z: \map f {m n} = \map f m \map f n$ Hence by [[True Statement is implied by Every Statement]]: :$\forall m, n \in \Z: m \perp n \implies \map f {m n} = \map f m \map f n$ So $f$ is [[Definition:Multipl...
Completely Multiplicative Function is Multiplicative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Completely_Multiplicative_Function_is_Multiplicative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Completely_Multiplicative_Function_is_Multiplicative
[ "Number Theory", "Completely Multiplicative Functions", "Multiplicative Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Function", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Completely Multiplicative Function", "Definition:Multiplicative Arithmetic Function" ]
[ "Definition:Completely Multiplicative Function", "True Statement is implied by Every Statement", "Definition:Multiplicative Arithmetic Function", "Category:Number Theory", "Category:Completely Multiplicative Functions", "Category:Multiplicative Functions" ]