id
stringlengths
11
15
title
stringlengths
7
171
problem
stringlengths
9
4.33k
solution
stringlengths
6
19k
problem_wikitext
stringlengths
9
4.42k
solution_wikitext
stringlengths
7
19.1k
proof_title
stringlengths
9
171
theorem_url
stringlengths
34
198
proof_url
stringlengths
36
198
categories
listlengths
0
9
theorem_references
listlengths
0
36
proof_references
listlengths
0
253
proofwiki-16100
Sum of Sequence of n Choose 2
Let $n \in \Z$ be an integer such that $n \ge 2$. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{j \mathop = 2}^n \dbinom j 2 | r = \dbinom 2 2 + \dbinom 3 2 + \dbinom 4 2 + \dotsb + \dbinom n 2 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dbinom {n + 1} 3 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} where $\dbinom n j$ denotes a binomial coefficient.
The proof proceeds by induction. For all $n \in \Z_{\ge 2}$, let $\map P n$ be the proposition: :$\ds \sum_{j \mathop = 2}^n \dbinom j 2 = \dbinom {n + 1} 3$ === Basis for the Induction === $\map P 2$ is the case: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{j \mathop = 2}^2 \dbinom j 2 | r = \dbinom 2 2 | c = }} {{eqn...
Let $n \in \Z$ be an [[Definition:Integer|integer]] such that $n \ge 2$. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{j \mathop = 2}^n \dbinom j 2 | r = \dbinom 2 2 + \dbinom 3 2 + \dbinom 4 2 + \dotsb + \dbinom n 2 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dbinom {n + 1} 3 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} where $\dbinom n j$ denotes a [[Def...
The proof proceeds by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]]. For all $n \in \Z_{\ge 2}$, let $\map P n$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :$\ds \sum_{j \mathop = 2}^n \dbinom j 2 = \dbinom {n + 1} 3$ === Basis for the Induction === $\map P 2$ is the case: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{j ...
Sum of Sequence of n Choose 2/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Sequence_of_n_Choose_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Sequence_of_n_Choose_2/Proof_2
[ "Binomial Coefficients", "Sum of Sequence of n Choose 2" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Binomial Coefficient" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Proposition", "Definition:Basis for the Induction", "Definition:Induction Hypothesis", "Definition:Induction Step", "Sum of Sequence of n Choose 2/Proof 2", "Pascal's Rule", "Principle of Mathematical Induction" ]
proofwiki-16101
If n is Triangular then so is 25n + 3
Let $n$ be a triangular number. Then $25 n + 3$ is also triangular.
Let $n$ be triangular. Then: :$\exists k \in \Z: n = \dfrac {k \paren {k + 1} } 2$ So: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 25 n + 3 | r = 25 \frac {k \paren {k + 1} } 2 + 3 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \frac {25 k^2 + 25 k + 6} 2 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \frac {\paren {5 k + 2} \paren {5 k + 3} } 2 | c = }} {{end-...
Let $n$ be a [[Definition:Triangular Number|triangular number]]. Then $25 n + 3$ is also [[Definition:Triangular Number|triangular]].
Let $n$ be [[Definition:Triangular Number|triangular]]. Then: :$\exists k \in \Z: n = \dfrac {k \paren {k + 1} } 2$ So: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 25 n + 3 | r = 25 \frac {k \paren {k + 1} } 2 + 3 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \frac {25 k^2 + 25 k + 6} 2 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \frac {\paren {5 k + 2} \paren ...
If n is Triangular then so is 25n + 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/If_n_is_Triangular_then_so_is_25n_+_3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/If_n_is_Triangular_then_so_is_25n_+_3
[ "Triangular Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Triangular Number", "Definition:Triangular Number" ]
[ "Definition:Triangular Number", "Definition:Triangular Number" ]
proofwiki-16102
If n is Triangular then so is 49n + 6
Let $n$ be a triangular number. Then $49 n + 6$ is also triangular.
Let $n$ be triangular. Then: :$\exists k \in \Z: n = \dfrac {k \paren {k + 1} } 2$ So: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 49 n + 6 | r = 49 \frac {k \paren {k + 1} } 2 + 6 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \frac {49 k^2 + 49 k + 12} 2 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \frac {\paren {7 k + 3} \paren {7 k + 4} } 2 | c = }} {{end...
Let $n$ be a [[Definition:Triangular Number|triangular number]]. Then $49 n + 6$ is also [[Definition:Triangular Number|triangular]].
Let $n$ be [[Definition:Triangular Number|triangular]]. Then: :$\exists k \in \Z: n = \dfrac {k \paren {k + 1} } 2$ So: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 49 n + 6 | r = 49 \frac {k \paren {k + 1} } 2 + 6 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \frac {49 k^2 + 49 k + 12} 2 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \frac {\paren {7 k + 3} \paren...
If n is Triangular then so is 49n + 6
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/If_n_is_Triangular_then_so_is_49n_+_6
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/If_n_is_Triangular_then_so_is_49n_+_6
[ "Triangular Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Triangular Number", "Definition:Triangular Number" ]
[ "Definition:Triangular Number", "Definition:Triangular Number" ]
proofwiki-16103
Sum of Sequence of Triangular Numbers
Let $n \in \Z_{>0}$ be a (strictly) positive integer. Let $T_n$ denote the $n$th triangular number. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{j \mathop = 1}^n T_j | r = T_1 + T_2 + T_3 + \dotsb + T_n | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {n \paren {n + 1} \paren {n + 2} } 6 | c = }} {{end-eqn}}
From Sum of Sequence of n Choose 2 we have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{j \mathop = 2}^n \dbinom j 2 | r = \dbinom 2 2 + \dbinom 3 2 + \dbinom 4 2 + \dotsb + \dbinom n 2 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dbinom {n + 1} 3 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} and so: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{j \mathop = 2}^{n + 1} \db...
Let $n \in \Z_{>0}$ be a [[Definition:Strictly Positive Integer|(strictly) positive integer]]. Let $T_n$ denote the $n$th [[Definition:Triangular Number|triangular number]]. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{j \mathop = 1}^n T_j | r = T_1 + T_2 + T_3 + \dotsb + T_n | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {n \p...
From [[Sum of Sequence of n Choose 2]] we have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{j \mathop = 2}^n \dbinom j 2 | r = \dbinom 2 2 + \dbinom 3 2 + \dbinom 4 2 + \dotsb + \dbinom n 2 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dbinom {n + 1} 3 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} and so: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{j \mathop = 2}^{n +...
Sum of Sequence of Triangular Numbers/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Sequence_of_Triangular_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Sequence_of_Triangular_Numbers/Proof_1
[ "Sum of Sequence of Triangular Numbers", "Triangular Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Strictly Positive/Integer", "Definition:Triangular Number" ]
[ "Sum of Sequence of n Choose 2", "Binomial Coefficient with Two" ]
proofwiki-16104
Sum of Sequence of Triangular Numbers
Let $n \in \Z_{>0}$ be a (strictly) positive integer. Let $T_n$ denote the $n$th triangular number. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{j \mathop = 1}^n T_j | r = T_1 + T_2 + T_3 + \dotsb + T_n | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {n \paren {n + 1} \paren {n + 2} } 6 | c = }} {{end-eqn}}
First let $n$ be even. Thus we have: :$n = 2 m$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = T_1 + T_2 + T_3 + \dotsb + T_{2 m} | r = \paren {T_1 + T_2} + \paren {T_3 + T_4} + \dotsb + \paren {T_{2 m - 1} + T_{2 m} } | c = }} {{eqn | r = 2^2 + 4^2 + \dotsb + \paren {2 m}^2 | c = Sum of Consecutive Triangular Numb...
Let $n \in \Z_{>0}$ be a [[Definition:Strictly Positive Integer|(strictly) positive integer]]. Let $T_n$ denote the $n$th [[Definition:Triangular Number|triangular number]]. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{j \mathop = 1}^n T_j | r = T_1 + T_2 + T_3 + \dotsb + T_n | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {n \p...
First let $n$ be [[Definition:Even Integer|even]]. Thus we have: :$n = 2 m$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = T_1 + T_2 + T_3 + \dotsb + T_{2 m} | r = \paren {T_1 + T_2} + \paren {T_3 + T_4} + \dotsb + \paren {T_{2 m - 1} + T_{2 m} } | c = }} {{eqn | r = 2^2 + 4^2 + \dotsb + \paren {2 m}^2 | c = [[S...
Sum of Sequence of Triangular Numbers/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Sequence_of_Triangular_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Sequence_of_Triangular_Numbers/Proof_2
[ "Sum of Sequence of Triangular Numbers", "Triangular Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Strictly Positive/Integer", "Definition:Triangular Number" ]
[ "Definition:Even Integer", "Sum of Consecutive Triangular Numbers is Square", "Sum of Consecutive Triangular Numbers is Square", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Closed Form for Triangular Numbers" ]
proofwiki-16105
Square of Odd Multiple of 3 is Difference between Triangular Numbers
Let $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$ be a positive integer. Let $T_n$ denote the $n$th triangular number. Let $m = 2 n + 1$ be an odd integer Then: :$\paren {3 m}^2 = T_{9 n + 4} - T_{3 n + 1}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = T_{9 n + 4} - T_{3 n + 1} | r = \dfrac {\paren {9 n + 4} \paren {9 n + 5} } 2 - \dfrac {\paren {3 n + 1} \paren {3 n + 2} } 2 | c = Closed Form for Triangular Numbers }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {\paren {81 n^2 + 81 n + 20} - \paren {9 n^2 + 9 n + 2} } 2 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfra...
Let $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$ be a [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integer]]. Let $T_n$ denote the $n$th [[Definition:Triangular Number|triangular number]]. Let $m = 2 n + 1$ be an [[Definition:Odd Integer|odd integer]] Then: :$\paren {3 m}^2 = T_{9 n + 4} - T_{3 n + 1}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = T_{9 n + 4} - T_{3 n + 1} | r = \dfrac {\paren {9 n + 4} \paren {9 n + 5} } 2 - \dfrac {\paren {3 n + 1} \paren {3 n + 2} } 2 | c = [[Closed Form for Triangular Numbers]] }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {\paren {81 n^2 + 81 n + 20} - \paren {9 n^2 + 9 n + 2} } 2 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \...
Square of Odd Multiple of 3 is Difference between Triangular Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Square_of_Odd_Multiple_of_3_is_Difference_between_Triangular_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Square_of_Odd_Multiple_of_3_is_Difference_between_Triangular_Numbers
[ "Triangular Numbers", "Square Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Triangular Number", "Definition:Odd Integer" ]
[ "Closed Form for Triangular Numbers" ]
proofwiki-16106
Square Sum of Three Consecutive Triangular Numbers
Let $T_n$ denote the $n$th triangular number for $n \in \Z_{>0}$ a (strictly) positive integer. Let $T_n + T_{n + 1} + T_{n + 2}$ be a square number. Then at least one value of $n$ fulfils this condition: :$n = 5$
Let $T_n + T_{n + 1} + T_{n + 2} = m^2$ for some $m \in \Z_{>0}$. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = T_n + T_{n + 1} + T_{n + 2} | r = \dfrac {n \paren {n + 1} } 2 + \dfrac {\paren {n + 1} \paren {n + 2} } 2 + \dfrac {\paren {n + 2} \paren {n + 3} } 2 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {n \paren {n + 1} + \paren ...
Let $T_n$ denote the $n$th [[Definition:Triangular Number|triangular number]] for $n \in \Z_{>0}$ a [[Definition:Strictly Positive Integer|(strictly) positive integer]]. Let $T_n + T_{n + 1} + T_{n + 2}$ be a [[Definition:Square Number|square number]]. Then at least one value of $n$ fulfils this condition: :$n = 5$
Let $T_n + T_{n + 1} + T_{n + 2} = m^2$ for some $m \in \Z_{>0}$. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = T_n + T_{n + 1} + T_{n + 2} | r = \dfrac {n \paren {n + 1} } 2 + \dfrac {\paren {n + 1} \paren {n + 2} } 2 + \dfrac {\paren {n + 2} \paren {n + 3} } 2 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {n \paren {n + 1} + \pare...
Square Sum of Three Consecutive Triangular Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Square_Sum_of_Three_Consecutive_Triangular_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Square_Sum_of_Three_Consecutive_Triangular_Numbers
[ "Triangular Numbers", "Square Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Triangular Number", "Definition:Strictly Positive/Integer", "Definition:Square Number" ]
[ "Definition:Square Number" ]
proofwiki-16107
Square Product of Three Consecutive Triangular Numbers
Let $T_n$ denote the $n$th triangular number for $n \in \Z_{>0}$ a (strictly) positive integer. Let $T_n \times T_{n + 1} \times T_{n + 2}$ be a square number. Then at least one value of $n$ fulfils this condition: :$n = 3$
Let $T_n \times T_{n + 1} \times T_{n + 2} = m^2$ for some $m \in \Z_{>0}$. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = T_n \times T_{n + 1} \times T_{n + 2} | r = \dfrac {n \paren {n + 1} } 2 \dfrac {\paren {n + 1} \paren {n + 2} } 2 \dfrac {\paren {n + 2} \paren {n + 3} } 2 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {n \paren {...
Let $T_n$ denote the $n$th [[Definition:Triangular Number|triangular number]] for $n \in \Z_{>0}$ a [[Definition:Strictly Positive Integer|(strictly) positive integer]]. Let $T_n \times T_{n + 1} \times T_{n + 2}$ be a [[Definition:Square Number|square number]]. Then at least one value of $n$ fulfils this condition:...
Let $T_n \times T_{n + 1} \times T_{n + 2} = m^2$ for some $m \in \Z_{>0}$. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = T_n \times T_{n + 1} \times T_{n + 2} | r = \dfrac {n \paren {n + 1} } 2 \dfrac {\paren {n + 1} \paren {n + 2} } 2 \dfrac {\paren {n + 2} \paren {n + 3} } 2 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {n \paren...
Square Product of Three Consecutive Triangular Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Square_Product_of_Three_Consecutive_Triangular_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Square_Product_of_Three_Consecutive_Triangular_Numbers
[ "Triangular Numbers", "Square Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Triangular Number", "Definition:Strictly Positive/Integer", "Definition:Square Number" ]
[ "Definition:Square Number" ]
proofwiki-16108
Sufficient Condition for Square of Product to be Triangular
Let $n \in \Z_{>0}$ be a (strictly) positive integer. Let $2 n^2 \pm 1 = m^2$ be a square number. Then $\paren {m n}^2$ is a triangular number.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {m n}^2 | r = \paren {2 n^2 \pm 1} \times n^2 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {\paren {2 n^2 \pm 1} \paren {2 n^2} } 2 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} That is, either: :$\paren {m n}^2 = \dfrac {\paren {2 n^2 - 1} \paren {2 n^2} } 2$ and so: :$\paren {m n}^2 = T_{2 n^2 - 1}$ or: :$...
Let $n \in \Z_{>0}$ be a [[Definition:Strictly Positive Integer|(strictly) positive integer]]. Let $2 n^2 \pm 1 = m^2$ be a [[Definition:Square Number|square number]]. Then $\paren {m n}^2$ is a [[Definition:Triangular Number|triangular number]].
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {m n}^2 | r = \paren {2 n^2 \pm 1} \times n^2 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {\paren {2 n^2 \pm 1} \paren {2 n^2} } 2 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} That is, either: :$\paren {m n}^2 = \dfrac {\paren {2 n^2 - 1} \paren {2 n^2} } 2$ and so: :$\paren {m n}^2 = T_{2 n^2 - 1}$ o...
Sufficient Condition for Square of Product to be Triangular
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sufficient_Condition_for_Square_of_Product_to_be_Triangular
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sufficient_Condition_for_Square_of_Product_to_be_Triangular
[ "Triangular Numbers", "Square Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Strictly Positive/Integer", "Definition:Square Number", "Definition:Triangular Number" ]
[]
proofwiki-16109
Trivial Topological Space is Indiscrete
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a trivial topological space. Then $\tau$ is an indiscrete topology.
By definition of trivial topological space, $S$ is a singleton. That is, $S$ is a set containing exactly one element. Suppose $S = \set x$ for some object $x$. Then the power set of $S$ is the set: :$\powerset S = \set {\O, \set x}$ That is: :$\powerset S = \set {\O, S}$ Let $\tau$ be a topology on $S$. We have that $...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Trivial Topological Space|trivial topological space]]. Then $\tau$ is an [[Definition:Indiscrete Topology|indiscrete topology]].
By definition of [[Definition:Trivial Topological Space|trivial topological space]], $S$ is a [[Definition:Singleton|singleton]]. That is, $S$ is a [[Definition:Set|set]] containing exactly one [[Definition:Element|element]]. Suppose $S = \set x$ for some [[Definition:Object|object]] $x$. Then the [[Definition:Powe...
Trivial Topological Space is Indiscrete
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Trivial_Topological_Space_is_Indiscrete
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Trivial_Topological_Space_is_Indiscrete
[ "Trivial Topological Spaces", "Indiscrete Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Trivial Topological Space", "Definition:Indiscrete Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Trivial Topological Space", "Definition:Singleton", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Object", "Definition:Power Set", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Topology", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Topology", "Empty Set is Element of Topology", "Ind...
proofwiki-16110
Existence of Divisor with Remainder between 2b and 3b
For every pair of integers $a, b$ where $b > 0$, there exist unique integers $q$ and $r$ where $2 b \le r < 3 b$ such that: :$a = q b + r$
From the Division Theorem, we have that: :$\forall a, b \in \Z, b > 0: \exists! q, r \in \Z: a = q b + r, 0 \le r < b$ So, with a view to where this is going, let $q$ and $r$ be renamed such that $a = q' b + r'$ with $0 \le r' < b$. Then let $q' = q + 2$. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a | r = q' b + r' ...
For every pair of [[Definition:Integer|integers]] $a, b$ where $b > 0$, there exist [[Definition:Unique|unique]] [[Definition:Integer|integers]] $q$ and $r$ where $2 b \le r < 3 b$ such that: :$a = q b + r$
From the [[Division Theorem]], we have that: :$\forall a, b \in \Z, b > 0: \exists! q, r \in \Z: a = q b + r, 0 \le r < b$ So, with a view to where this is going, let $q$ and $r$ be renamed such that $a = q' b + r'$ with $0 \le r' < b$. Then let $q' = q + 2$. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a | r = q' b...
Existence of Divisor with Remainder between 2b and 3b
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Existence_of_Divisor_with_Remainder_between_2b_and_3b
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Existence_of_Divisor_with_Remainder_between_2b_and_3b
[ "Division Theorem" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Unique", "Definition:Integer" ]
[ "Division Theorem" ]
proofwiki-16111
Integer of form 6k + 5 is of form 3k + 2 but not Conversely
Let $n \in \Z$ be an integer of the form: :$n = 6 k + 5$ where $k \in \Z$. Then $n$ can also be expressed in the form: :$n = 3 k + 2$ for some other $k \in \Z$. However it is not necessarily the case that if $n$ can be expressed in the form: :$n = 3 k + 2$ then it can also be expressed in the form: :$n = 6 k + 5$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = n | r = 6 k + 5 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 3 \paren {2 k} + 3 + 2 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 3 \paren {2 k + 1} + 2 | c = for some $2 k + 1 \in \Z$ }} {{end-eqn}} Replacing $2 k + 1$ with $k$ gives the result. {{qed|lemma}} Now consider $n = 8$. We have that: :$8 = 3 \times 2 + 2...
Let $n \in \Z$ be an [[Definition:Integer|integer]] of the form: :$n = 6 k + 5$ where $k \in \Z$. Then $n$ can also be expressed in the form: :$n = 3 k + 2$ for some other $k \in \Z$. However it is not necessarily the case that if $n$ can be expressed in the form: :$n = 3 k + 2$ then it can also be expressed in the...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = n | r = 6 k + 5 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 3 \paren {2 k} + 3 + 2 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 3 \paren {2 k + 1} + 2 | c = for some $2 k + 1 \in \Z$ }} {{end-eqn}} Replacing $2 k + 1$ with $k$ gives the result. {{qed|lemma}} Now consider $n = 8$. We have that: :$8 = 3 \times 2...
Integer of form 6k + 5 is of form 3k + 2 but not Conversely
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integer_of_form_6k_+_5_is_of_form_3k_+_2_but_not_Conversely
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integer_of_form_6k_+_5_is_of_form_3k_+_2_but_not_Conversely
[ "Modulo Arithmetic" ]
[ "Definition:Integer" ]
[]
proofwiki-16112
Odd Integer Modulo 4
Let $n$ be an odd integer. Then $n$ can be expressed either as: :$n = 4 k + 1$ or as: :$n = 4 k + 3$
By the Division Theorem, $n$ can be expressed as: :$n = 4 k + r$ where: :$k, r \in \Z$ :$0 \le r < 4$ That is, one of the following holds: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = n | r = 4 k }} {{eqn | l = n | r = 4 k + 1 }} {{eqn | l = n | r = 4 k + 2 }} {{eqn | l = n | r = 4 k + 3 }} {{end-eqn}} Of these: {...
Let $n$ be an [[Definition:Odd Integer|odd integer]]. Then $n$ can be expressed either as: :$n = 4 k + 1$ or as: :$n = 4 k + 3$
By the [[Division Theorem]], $n$ can be expressed as: :$n = 4 k + r$ where: :$k, r \in \Z$ :$0 \le r < 4$ That is, one of the following holds: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = n | r = 4 k }} {{eqn | l = n | r = 4 k + 1 }} {{eqn | l = n | r = 4 k + 2 }} {{eqn | l = n | r = 4 k + 3 }} {{end-eqn}} Of...
Odd Integer Modulo 4
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Odd_Integer_Modulo_4
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Odd_Integer_Modulo_4
[ "Odd Integers" ]
[ "Definition:Odd Integer" ]
[ "Division Theorem", "Definition:Even Integer", "Definition:Odd Integer" ]
proofwiki-16113
Cube Modulo 9
Let $x \in \Z$ be an integer. Then one of the following holds: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x^3 | o = \equiv | r = 0 \pmod 9 | c = }} {{eqn | l = x^3 | o = \equiv | r = 1 \pmod 9 | c = }} {{eqn | l = x^3 | o = \equiv | r = 8 \pmod 9 | c = }} {{end-eqn}}
Let $x$ be an integer. There are three cases to consider: :$(1): \quad x \equiv 0 \pmod 3$: we have $x = 3 k$ :$(2): \quad x \equiv 1 \pmod 3$: we have $x = 3 k + 1$ :$(3): \quad x \equiv 2 \pmod 3$: we have $x = 3 k + 2$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | l = x | r = 3 k | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leads...
Let $x \in \Z$ be an [[Definition:Integer|integer]]. Then one of the following holds: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x^3 | o = \equiv | r = 0 \pmod 9 | c = }} {{eqn | l = x^3 | o = \equiv | r = 1 \pmod 9 | c = }} {{eqn | l = x^3 | o = \equiv | r = 8 \pmod 9 | c = }}...
Let $x$ be an [[Definition:Integer|integer]]. There are three cases to consider: :$(1): \quad x \equiv 0 \pmod 3$: we have $x = 3 k$ :$(2): \quad x \equiv 1 \pmod 3$: we have $x = 3 k + 1$ :$(3): \quad x \equiv 2 \pmod 3$: we have $x = 3 k + 2$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | l = x | r = 3 k ...
Cube Modulo 9
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cube_Modulo_9
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cube_Modulo_9
[ "Modulo Arithmetic", "Cube Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Integer" ]
[ "Definition:Integer" ]
proofwiki-16114
N (n + 1) (2n + 1) over 6 is Integer
Let $n \in \Z$ be an integer. Then $\dfrac {n \paren {n + 1} \paren {2 n + 1} } 6$ is also an integer.
This is equivalent to proving that $n \paren {n + 1} \paren {2 n + 1}$ is a multiple of $6$. There are $6$ cases to consider: :$(1): \quad n \equiv 0 \pmod 6$: we have $n = 6 k$ :$(2): \quad n \equiv 1 \pmod 6$: we have $n = 6 k + 1$ :$(3): \quad n \equiv 2 \pmod 6$: we have $n = 6 k + 2$ :$(4): \quad n \equiv 3 \pmod ...
Let $n \in \Z$ be an [[Definition:Integer|integer]]. Then $\dfrac {n \paren {n + 1} \paren {2 n + 1} } 6$ is also an [[Definition:Integer|integer]].
This is equivalent to proving that $n \paren {n + 1} \paren {2 n + 1}$ is a [[Definition:Multiple of Integer|multiple]] of $6$. There are $6$ cases to consider: :$(1): \quad n \equiv 0 \pmod 6$: we have $n = 6 k$ :$(2): \quad n \equiv 1 \pmod 6$: we have $n = 6 k + 1$ :$(3): \quad n \equiv 2 \pmod 6$: we have $n =...
N (n + 1) (2n + 1) over 6 is Integer
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/N_(n_+_1)_(2n_+_1)_over_6_is_Integer
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/N_(n_+_1)_(2n_+_1)_over_6_is_Integer
[ "Divisibility" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Integer" ]
[ "Definition:Multiple/Integer" ]
proofwiki-16115
Number which is Square and Cube Modulo 7
Let $n \in \Z$ be an integer. Let $n$ be both a square and a cube at the same time. Then either: :$n \equiv 0 \pmod 7$ or: :$n \equiv 1 \pmod 7$
Let $n = r^2 = s^3$ for some $r, s \in \Z$. Then: :$n = \paren {m^2}^3 = \paren {m^3}^2 = m^6$ for some $m \in \Z$ There are $7$ cases to consider: :$(0): \quad m \equiv 0 \pmod 7$: we have $m = 7 k$ :$(1): \quad m \equiv 1 \pmod 7$: we have $m = 7 k + 1$ :$(2): \quad m \equiv 2 \pmod 7$: we have $m = 7 k + 2$ :$(3): \...
Let $n \in \Z$ be an [[Definition:Integer|integer]]. Let $n$ be both a [[Definition:Square Number|square]] and a [[Definition:Cube Number|cube]] at the same time. Then either: :$n \equiv 0 \pmod 7$ or: :$n \equiv 1 \pmod 7$
Let $n = r^2 = s^3$ for some $r, s \in \Z$. Then: :$n = \paren {m^2}^3 = \paren {m^3}^2 = m^6$ for some $m \in \Z$ There are $7$ cases to consider: :$(0): \quad m \equiv 0 \pmod 7$: we have $m = 7 k$ :$(1): \quad m \equiv 1 \pmod 7$: we have $m = 7 k + 1$ :$(2): \quad m \equiv 2 \pmod 7$: we have $m = 7 k + 2$ :...
Number which is Square and Cube Modulo 7/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_which_is_Square_and_Cube_Modulo_7
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_which_is_Square_and_Cube_Modulo_7/Proof_1
[ "Number which is Square and Cube Modulo 7", "Cube Numbers", "Square Numbers", "Modulo Arithmetic" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Square Number", "Definition:Cube Number" ]
[ "Congruence of Powers", "Definition:Congruence (Number Theory)/Integers", "Definition:Integer" ]
proofwiki-16116
Division Theorem/Half Remainder Version
For every pair of integers $a, b$ where $b \ne 0$, there exist unique integers $q, r$ such that $a = q b + r$ and $-\dfrac {\size b} 2 \le r < \dfrac {\size b} 2$: :$\forall a, b \in \Z, b \ne 0: \exists! q, r \in \Z: a = q b + r, -\dfrac {\size b} 2 \le r < \dfrac {\size b} 2$
{{ProofWanted|boring}}
For every pair of [[Definition:Integer|integers]] $a, b$ where $b \ne 0$, there exist [[Definition:Unique|unique]] [[Definition:Integer|integers]] $q, r$ such that $a = q b + r$ and $-\dfrac {\size b} 2 \le r < \dfrac {\size b} 2$: :$\forall a, b \in \Z, b \ne 0: \exists! q, r \in \Z: a = q b + r, -\dfrac {\size b} 2 ...
{{ProofWanted|boring}}
Division Theorem/Half Remainder Version
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Division_Theorem/Half_Remainder_Version
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Division_Theorem/Half_Remainder_Version
[ "Division Theorem" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Unique", "Definition:Integer" ]
[]
proofwiki-16117
Khinchin's Law
Let $P$ be a population. Let $P$ have mean $\mu$ and finite variance. Let $\sequence {X_n}_{n \mathop \ge 1}$ be a sequence of random variables forming a random sample from $P$. Let: :$\ds {\overline X}_n = \frac 1 n \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n X_i$ Then: :${\overline X}_n \xrightarrow p \mu$ where $\xrightarrow p$ denote...
Let $\sigma$ be the standard deviation of $P$. By the definition of convergence in probability, we aim to show that: :$\ds \lim_{n \mathop \to \infty} \map \Pr {\size { {\overline X}_n - \mu} < \epsilon} = 1$ for all real $\epsilon > 0$. Let $\epsilon > 0$ be a real number. By Variance of Sample Mean: :$\var {{\overli...
Let $P$ be a [[Definition:Population|population]]. Let $P$ have [[Definition:Expectation|mean]] $\mu$ and finite [[Definition:Variance|variance]]. Let $\sequence {X_n}_{n \mathop \ge 1}$ be a [[Definition:Sequence|sequence]] of [[Definition:Random Variable|random variables]] forming a [[Definition:Random Sample (Sta...
Let $\sigma$ be the [[Definition:Standard Deviation|standard deviation]] of $P$. By the definition of [[Definition:Convergence in Probability|convergence in probability]], we aim to show that: :$\ds \lim_{n \mathop \to \infty} \map \Pr {\size { {\overline X}_n - \mu} < \epsilon} = 1$ for all [[Definition:Real Numbe...
Khinchin's Law
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Khinchin's_Law
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Khinchin's_Law
[ "Khinchin's Law", "Laws of Large Numbers", "Probability Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Population", "Definition:Expectation", "Definition:Variance", "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Random Variable", "Definition:Random Sample (Statistics)", "Definition:Convergence in Probability" ]
[ "Definition:Standard Deviation", "Definition:Convergence in Probability", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Real Number", "Variance of Sample Mean", "Bienaymé-Chebyshev Inequality", "Definition:Real Number", "Squeeze Theorem", "Definition:Real Number" ]
proofwiki-16118
Variance of Linear Combination of Random Variables/Corollary
Let $X$ and $Y$ be independent random variables.
From Variance of Linear Combination of Random Variables, we have: :$\var {a X + b Y} = a^2 \, \var X + b^2 \, \var Y + 2 a b \, \cov {X, Y}$ where $\cov {X, Y}$ is the covariance of $X$ and $Y$. From Covariance of Independent Random Variables is Zero: :$2 a b \, \cov {X, Y} = 0$ The result follows. {{qed}} Category:...
Let $X$ and $Y$ be [[Definition:Independent Random Variables|independent random variables]].
From [[Variance of Linear Combination of Random Variables]], we have: :$\var {a X + b Y} = a^2 \, \var X + b^2 \, \var Y + 2 a b \, \cov {X, Y}$ where $\cov {X, Y}$ is the [[Definition:Covariance|covariance]] of $X$ and $Y$. From [[Covariance of Independent Random Variables is Zero]]: :$2 a b \, \cov {X, Y} = 0$...
Variance of Linear Combination of Random Variables/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Variance_of_Linear_Combination_of_Random_Variables/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Variance_of_Linear_Combination_of_Random_Variables/Corollary
[ "Variance" ]
[ "Definition:Independent Random Variables" ]
[ "Variance of Linear Combination of Random Variables", "Definition:Covariance", "Covariance of Independent Random Variables is Zero", "Category:Variance" ]
proofwiki-16119
Singleton is Connected in Topological Space
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $x \in S$. Then the singleton $\set x$ is connected.
Let $A = \set x$. From definition $3$ of a connected set, $A$ is connected in $T$ {{iff}} the subspace $\struct {A, \tau_A}$ is a connected space. From Topology on Singleton is Indiscrete Topology, $\tau_A$ is the indiscrete topology. From Indiscrete Space is Connected, $\struct {A, \tau_A}$ is a connected space. {{qed...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $x \in S$. Then the [[Definition:Singleton|singleton]] $\set x$ is [[Definition:Connected Set (Topology)|connected]].
Let $A = \set x$. From [[Definition:Connected Set (Topology)/Definition 3|definition $3$ of a connected set]], $A$ is [[Definition:Connected Set (Topology)/Definition 3|connected]] in $T$ {{iff}} the [[Definition:Topological Subspace|subspace]] $\struct {A, \tau_A}$ is a [[Definition:Connected Topological Space|conne...
Singleton is Connected in Topological Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Singleton_is_Connected_in_Topological_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Singleton_is_Connected_in_Topological_Space
[ "Connected Sets (Topology)", "Singletons" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Singleton", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)" ]
[ "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)/Definition 3", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)/Definition 3", "Definition:Topological Subspace", "Definition:Connected Topological Space", "Trivial Topological Space is Indiscrete", "Definition:Indiscrete Topology", "Indiscrete Space is Connected", "Definition...
proofwiki-16120
Equivalence of Definitions of Component/Lemma 1
:$C$ is connected in $T$ and $C \in \CC_x$.
From Singleton is Connected in Topological Space, $\set{x}$ is a connected set of $T$ containing $x$. It follows that $x \in C$. From Union of Connected Sets with Common Point is Connected, $C$ is a connected set of $T$. Hence $C \in \CC_x$. {{qed}} Category:Equivalence of Definitions of Component g3treh4at5mzazjpq27g...
:$C$ is [[Definition:Connected Set (Topology)|connected]] in $T$ and $C \in \CC_x$.
From [[Singleton is Connected in Topological Space]], $\set{x}$ is a [[Definition:Connected Set (Topology)|connected set]] of $T$ containing $x$. It follows that $x \in C$. From [[Union of Connected Sets with Common Point is Connected]], $C$ is a [[Definition:Connected Set (Topology)|connected set]] of $T$. Hence $...
Equivalence of Definitions of Component/Lemma 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Component/Lemma_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Component/Lemma_1
[ "Equivalence of Definitions of Component" ]
[ "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)" ]
[ "Singleton is Connected in Topological Space", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)", "Union of Connected Sets with Common Point is Connected", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)", "Category:Equivalence of Definitions of Component" ]
proofwiki-16121
Variance of Sample Mean
Let $X_1, X_2, \ldots, X_n$ form a random sample from a population with mean $\mu$ and variance $\sigma^2$. Let: :$\ds \overline X = \frac 1 n \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n X_i$ Then: :$\var {\overline X} = \dfrac {\sigma^2} n$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \var {\overline X} | r = \var {\frac 1 n \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n X_i} }} {{eqn | r = \frac 1 {n^2} \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n \var {X_i} | c = repeated application of {{Corollary|Variance of Linear Combination of Random Variables}} }} {{eqn | r = \frac 1 {n^2} \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n \si...
Let $X_1, X_2, \ldots, X_n$ form a [[Definition:Random Sample (Statistics)|random sample]] from a population with [[Definition:Expectation|mean]] $\mu$ and [[Definition:Variance|variance]] $\sigma^2$. Let: :$\ds \overline X = \frac 1 n \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n X_i$ Then: :$\var {\overline X} = \dfrac {\sigma^2} n$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \var {\overline X} | r = \var {\frac 1 n \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n X_i} }} {{eqn | r = \frac 1 {n^2} \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n \var {X_i} | c = repeated application of {{Corollary|Variance of Linear Combination of Random Variables}} }} {{eqn | r = \frac 1 {n^2} \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n \si...
Variance of Sample Mean
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Variance_of_Sample_Mean
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Variance_of_Sample_Mean
[ "Variance", "Inductive Statistics" ]
[ "Definition:Random Sample (Statistics)", "Definition:Expectation", "Definition:Variance" ]
[ "Category:Variance", "Category:Inductive Statistics" ]
proofwiki-16122
Product of Divisors is Divisor of Product
Let $a, b, c, d \in \Z$ be integers such that $a, c \ne 0$. Let $a \divides b$ and $c \divides d$, where $\divides$ denotes divisibility. Then: :$a c \divides b d$
By definition of divisibility: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \exists k_1 \in \Z | l = b | r = a k_1 }} {{eqn | q = \exists k_2 \in \Z | l = d | r = c k_2 }} {{end-eqn}} Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = b d | r = \paren {a k_1} \paren {c k_2} | c = }} {{eqn | r = k_1 k_2 \paren {a c} ...
Let $a, b, c, d \in \Z$ be [[Definition:Integer|integers]] such that $a, c \ne 0$. Let $a \divides b$ and $c \divides d$, where $\divides$ denotes [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divisibility]]. Then: :$a c \divides b d$
By definition of [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divisibility]]: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \exists k_1 \in \Z | l = b | r = a k_1 }} {{eqn | q = \exists k_2 \in \Z | l = d | r = c k_2 }} {{end-eqn}} Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = b d | r = \paren {a k_1} \paren {c k_2} | c = }} {...
Product of Divisors is Divisor of Product
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_of_Divisors_is_Divisor_of_Product
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_of_Divisors_is_Divisor_of_Product
[ "Divisors" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer" ]
[ "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer" ]
proofwiki-16123
Common Divisor Divides Integer Combination/General Result
Let $c$ be a common divisor of a set of integers $A := \set {a_1, a_2, \dotsc, a_n}$. That is: :$\forall x \in A: c \divides x$ Then $c$ divides any integer combination of elements of $A$: :$\forall x_1, x_2, \dotsc, x_n \in \Z: c \divides \paren {a_1 x_2 + a_2 x_2 + \dotsb + a_n x_n}$
The proof proceeds by induction. For all $n \in \Z_{\ge 2}$, let $\map P n$ be the proposition: :$\forall x \in \set {a_1, a_2, \dotsc, a_n}: c \divides x \implies \forall x_1, x_2, \dotsc, x_n \in \Z: c \divides \paren {a_1 x_2 + a_2 x_2 + \dotsb + a_n x_n}$
Let $c$ be a [[Definition:Common Divisor of Integers|common divisor]] of a [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Integer|integers]] $A := \set {a_1, a_2, \dotsc, a_n}$. That is: :$\forall x \in A: c \divides x$ Then $c$ divides any [[Definition:Integer Combination|integer combination]] of [[Definition:Element|eleme...
The proof proceeds by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]]. For all $n \in \Z_{\ge 2}$, let $\map P n$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :$\forall x \in \set {a_1, a_2, \dotsc, a_n}: c \divides x \implies \forall x_1, x_2, \dotsc, x_n \in \Z: c \divides \paren {a_1 x_2 + a_2 x_2 + \dotsb + a_...
Common Divisor Divides Integer Combination/General Result
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Common_Divisor_Divides_Integer_Combination/General_Result
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Common_Divisor_Divides_Integer_Combination/General_Result
[ "Common Divisor Divides Integer Combination" ]
[ "Definition:Common Divisor/Integers", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Integer Combination", "Definition:Element" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Proposition", "Principle of Mathematical Induction" ]
proofwiki-16124
One is Common Divisor of Integers
Let $a, b \in \Z$ be integers. Then $1$ is a common divisor of $a$ and $b$.
From One Divides all Integers: :$1 \divides a$ and: :$1 \divides b$ where $\divides$ denotes divisibility. The result follows by definition of common divisor. {{Qed}}
Let $a, b \in \Z$ be [[Definition:Integer|integers]]. Then $1$ is a [[Definition:Common Divisor of Integers|common divisor]] of $a$ and $b$.
From [[One Divides all Integers]]: :$1 \divides a$ and: :$1 \divides b$ where $\divides$ denotes [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divisibility]]. The result follows by definition of [[Definition:Common Divisor of Integers|common divisor]]. {{Qed}}
One is Common Divisor of Integers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/One_is_Common_Divisor_of_Integers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/One_is_Common_Divisor_of_Integers
[ "Divisors" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Common Divisor/Integers" ]
[ "Integer Divisor Results/One Divides all Integers", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Common Divisor/Integers" ]
proofwiki-16125
Set of Common Divisors of Integers is not Empty
Let $a, b \in \Z$ be integers. Let $S$ be the set of common divisors of $a$ and $b$. Then $S$ is not empty.
From One is Common Divisor of Integers: :$1$ is a common divisor of $a$ and $b$. Thus, whatever $a$ and $b$ are: :$1 \in S$ The result follows by definition of empty set. {{Qed}}
Let $a, b \in \Z$ be [[Definition:Integer|integers]]. Let $S$ be the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Common Divisor of Integers|common divisors]] of $a$ and $b$. Then $S$ is not [[Definition:Empty Set|empty]].
From [[One is Common Divisor of Integers]]: :$1$ is a [[Definition:Common Divisor of Integers|common divisor]] of $a$ and $b$. Thus, whatever $a$ and $b$ are: :$1 \in S$ The result follows by definition of [[Definition:Empty Set|empty set]]. {{Qed}}
Set of Common Divisors of Integers is not Empty
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_of_Common_Divisors_of_Integers_is_not_Empty
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_of_Common_Divisors_of_Integers_is_not_Empty
[ "Divisors" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Common Divisor/Integers", "Definition:Empty Set" ]
[ "One is Common Divisor of Integers", "Definition:Common Divisor/Integers", "Definition:Empty Set" ]
proofwiki-16126
Kolmogorov's Law
Let $P$ be a population. Let $P$ have mean $\mu$ and finite variance. Let $\sequence {X_n}_{n \mathop \ge 1}$ be a sequence of random variables forming a random sample from $P$. Let: :$\ds {\overline X}_n = \frac 1 n \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n X_i$ Then: :$\ds {\overline X}_n \xrightarrow {\text {a.s.} } \mu$ where $\xri...
We may assume that $X_n \ge 0$ for all $n \ge 1$. Indeed, otherwise consider: :${X_n}^+ := \max \set {X_n, 0}$ and: :${X_n}^- := \max \set {- X_n, 0}$ instead of $X_n$. Let $\varepsilon \in \R_{>0}$. For $k \ge 1$ let: :$\ell_k := \floor {\paren {1 + \epsilon}^k }$ be the floor of $\paren {1 + \epsilon}^k$. Then: {{beg...
Let $P$ be a [[Definition:Population|population]]. Let $P$ have [[Definition:Expectation|mean]] $\mu$ and finite [[Definition:Variance|variance]]. Let $\sequence {X_n}_{n \mathop \ge 1}$ be a [[Definition:Sequence|sequence]] of [[Definition:Random Variable|random variables]] forming a [[Definition:Random Sample (Sta...
We may assume that $X_n \ge 0$ for all $n \ge 1$. Indeed, otherwise consider: :${X_n}^+ := \max \set {X_n, 0}$ and: :${X_n}^- := \max \set {- X_n, 0}$ instead of $X_n$. Let $\varepsilon \in \R_{>0}$. For $k \ge 1$ let: :$\ell_k := \floor {\paren {1 + \epsilon}^k }$ be the [[Definition:Floor Function|floor]] of $\pa...
Kolmogorov's Law
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Kolmogorov's_Law
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Kolmogorov's_Law
[ "Kolmogorov's Law", "Laws of Large Numbers", "Probability Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Population", "Definition:Expectation", "Definition:Variance", "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Random Variable", "Definition:Random Sample (Statistics)", "Definition:Almost Sure Convergence" ]
[ "Definition:Floor Function", "Borel-Cantelli Lemma" ]
proofwiki-16127
Equivalence of Definitions of Path Component
{{TFAE|def = Path Component|view = path component|context = Topology (Mathematical Branch)|contextview = topology}} Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $x \in T$. === Equivalence Class === {{:Definition:Path Component/Equivalence Class}} === Union of Path-Connected Sets === {{:Definition:Path Compon...
Let $\CC_x = \set {A \subseteq S : x \in A \land A \text { is path-connected in } T}$ Let $C = \bigcup \CC_x$.
{{TFAE|def = Path Component|view = path component|context = Topology (Mathematical Branch)|contextview = topology}} Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $x \in T$. === [[Definition:Path Component/Equivalence Class|Equivalence Class]] === {{:Definition:Path Compon...
Let $\CC_x = \set {A \subseteq S : x \in A \land A \text { is path-connected in } T}$ Let $C = \bigcup \CC_x$.
Equivalence of Definitions of Path Component
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Path_Component
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Path_Component
[ "Equivalence of Definitions of Path Component", "Path Components", "Path-Connected Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Path Component/Equivalence Class", "Definition:Path Component/Union of Path-Connected Sets", "Definition:Path Component/Maximal Path-Connected Set" ]
[]
proofwiki-16128
GCD of Integer and its Negative
Let $a \in \Z$ be an integer. Then: :$\gcd \set {a, -a} = \size a$ where: :$\gcd$ denotes greatest common divisor :$\size a$ denotes the absolute value of $a$.
From Integer Divisor Results, the divisors of $a$ include $a$ itself. From Integer Divides its Negative, $a \divides \paren {-a}$. Thus we have: :$a \divides a$ and: :$a \divides -a$ and so: :$\gcd \set {a, -a} \ge \size a$ From Absolute Value of Integer is not less than Divisors, there is no divisor of $a$ which is gr...
Let $a \in \Z$ be an [[Definition:Integer|integer]]. Then: :$\gcd \set {a, -a} = \size a$ where: :$\gcd$ denotes [[Definition:Greatest Common Divisor of Integers|greatest common divisor]] :$\size a$ denotes the [[Definition:Absolute Value|absolute value]] of $a$.
From [[Integer Divisor Results]], the [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divisors]] of $a$ include $a$ itself. From [[Integer Divides its Negative]], $a \divides \paren {-a}$. Thus we have: :$a \divides a$ and: :$a \divides -a$ and so: :$\gcd \set {a, -a} \ge \size a$ From [[Absolute Value of Integer is not less than...
GCD of Integer and its Negative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/GCD_of_Integer_and_its_Negative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/GCD_of_Integer_and_its_Negative
[ "Greatest Common Divisor" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Greatest Common Divisor/Integers", "Definition:Absolute Value" ]
[ "Integer Divisor Results", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Integer Divisor Results/Integer Divides its Negative", "Absolute Value of Integer is not less than Divisors", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Category:Greatest Common Divisor" ]
proofwiki-16129
Equivalence of Definitions of Path Component/Lemma
:$C$ is path-connected in $T$ and $C \in \CC_x$.
From Point is Path-Connected to Itself, $\set x$ is a path-connected subset of $T$ containing $x$. It follows that $x \in C$. From Union of Path-Connected Sets with Common Point is Path-Connected, $C$ is a path-connected subset of $T$. Hence $C \in \CC_x$. {{qed}} Category:Equivalence of Definitions of Path Component ...
:$C$ is [[Definition:Path-Connected Set|path-connected]] in $T$ and $C \in \CC_x$.
From [[Point is Path-Connected to Itself]], $\set x$ is a [[Definition:Path-Connected Set|path-connected subset]] of $T$ containing $x$. It follows that $x \in C$. From [[Union of Path-Connected Sets with Common Point is Path-Connected]], $C$ is a [[Definition:Path-Connected Set|path-connected subset]] of $T$. Henc...
Equivalence of Definitions of Path Component/Lemma
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Path_Component/Lemma
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Path_Component/Lemma
[ "Equivalence of Definitions of Path Component" ]
[ "Definition:Path-Connected/Set" ]
[ "Point is Path-Connected to Itself", "Definition:Path-Connected/Set", "Union of Path-Connected Sets with Common Point is Path-Connected", "Definition:Path-Connected/Set", "Category:Equivalence of Definitions of Path Component" ]
proofwiki-16130
Square Divides Product of Multiples
Let $a, b, c, \in \Z$ be integers. Let: :$a \divides b, a \divides c$ where $\divides$ denotes divisibility. Then: :$a^2 \divides b c$
We have that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a | o = \divides | r = b | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | q = \exists k_1 \in \Z | l = k_1 a | r = b | c = {{Defof|Divisor of Integer}} }} {{eqn | l = a | o = \divides | r = c | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | q = \e...
Let $a, b, c, \in \Z$ be [[Definition:Integer|integers]]. Let: :$a \divides b, a \divides c$ where $\divides$ denotes [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divisibility]]. Then: :$a^2 \divides b c$
We have that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a | o = \divides | r = b | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | q = \exists k_1 \in \Z | l = k_1 a | r = b | c = {{Defof|Divisor of Integer}} }} {{eqn | l = a | o = \divides | r = c | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | q = \...
Square Divides Product of Multiples
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Square_Divides_Product_of_Multiples
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Square_Divides_Product_of_Multiples
[ "Divisors" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer" ]
[]
proofwiki-16131
Equivalence of Definitions of Path Component/Equivalence Class equals Union of Path-Connected Sets
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $x \in T$. Let $\CC_x = \leftset {A \subseteq S : x \in A \land A}$ is path-connected in $\rightset T$. Let $C = \bigcup \CC_x$ Let $\sim$ be the equivalence relation defined by: :$y \sim z$ {{iff}} $y$ and $z$ are path-connected in $T$. Let $C'$ be the equivalenc...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = y \in C' | o = \leadstoandfrom | r = x \text { is path-connected to } y \text { in } T | c = Definition of $\sim$ }} {{eqn | o = \leadstoandfrom | r = \exists B \text{ a connected set of } T, x \in B, y \in B | c = Points are Path-Connected iff Contained in Path-C...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $x \in T$. Let $\CC_x = \leftset {A \subseteq S : x \in A \land A}$ is [[Definition:Path-Connected Set|path-connected]] in $\rightset T$. Let $C = \bigcup \CC_x$ Let $\sim$ be the [[Definition:Equivalence Relation|equivalence...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = y \in C' | o = \leadstoandfrom | r = x \text { is path-connected to } y \text { in } T | c = Definition of $\sim$ }} {{eqn | o = \leadstoandfrom | r = \exists B \text{ a connected set of } T, x \in B, y \in B | c = [[Points are Path-Connected iff Contained in Path...
Equivalence of Definitions of Path Component/Equivalence Class equals Union of Path-Connected Sets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Path_Component/Equivalence_Class_equals_Union_of_Path-Connected_Sets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Path_Component/Equivalence_Class_equals_Union_of_Path-Connected_Sets
[ "Equivalence of Definitions of Path Component" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Path-Connected/Set", "Definition:Equivalence Relation", "Definition:Path-Connected/Points", "Definition:Equivalence Class" ]
[ "Points are Path-Connected iff Contained in Path-Connected Set" ]
proofwiki-16132
Image of Path is Path-Connected Set
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $I \subset \R$ be the closed real interval $\closedint a b$. Let $\gamma: I \to S$ be a path. Then: :$\map \gamma I$ is a path-connected set of $T$.
From Path-Connected iff Path-Connected to Point, $\map \gamma I$ is a path-connected set {{iff}} every point of $\map \gamma I$ is path-connected to a common point. It is shown that every point of $\map \gamma I$ is path-connected to $\map \gamma a$. Let $H = \map \gamma I$. Let $x = \map \gamma a$. From Point is Path-...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $I \subset \R$ be the [[Definition:Closed Real Interval|closed real interval]] $\closedint a b$. Let $\gamma: I \to S$ be a [[Definition:Path (Topology)|path]]. Then: :$\map \gamma I$ is a [[Definition:Path-Connected Set|path-c...
From [[Path-Connected iff Path-Connected to Point]], $\map \gamma I$ is a [[Definition:Path-Connected Set|path-connected set]] {{iff}} every point of $\map \gamma I$ is [[Definition:Path-Connected Points|path-connected]] to a common point. It is shown that every point of $\map \gamma I$ is [[Definition:Path-Connected ...
Image of Path is Path-Connected Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Image_of_Path_is_Path-Connected_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Image_of_Path_is_Path-Connected_Set
[ "Path-Connected Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Real Interval/Closed", "Definition:Path (Topology)", "Definition:Path-Connected/Set" ]
[ "Path-Connected iff Path-Connected to Point", "Definition:Path-Connected/Set", "Definition:Path-Connected/Points", "Definition:Path-Connected/Points", "Point is Path-Connected to Itself", "Definition:Path-Connected/Points", "Continuity of Composite with Inclusion", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topo...
proofwiki-16133
Acceleration of Particle moving in Circle at Constant Speed
Let $P$ be a particle moving in a circular path $C$ at a constant speed. Then the acceleration of $P$, denoted by $\mathbf a \in \R$, is given as: :$\mathbf a = -\dfrac {\size {\mathbf v}^2 \mathbf r} {\size {\mathbf r}^2}$ where: :$\mathbf v$ is the instantaneous velocity of $P$ :$\mathbf r$ is the vector whose magnit...
Let the center of $C$ be placed at the origin of a two-dimensional coordinate system where the circular path is in the $xy$ plane. Using the parametric equation of a circle, we can write the position of $P$ as the vector-valued function :$\ds \map {\mathbf r} t = \begin{bmatrix} r \map \cos {\omega t} \\ r \map \sin {\...
Let $P$ be a [[Definition:Particle|particle]] moving in a [[Definition:Circle|circular path]] $C$ at a [[Definition:Constant Speed|constant speed]]. Then the [[Definition:Acceleration|acceleration]] of $P$, denoted by $\mathbf a \in \R$, is given as: :$\mathbf a = -\dfrac {\size {\mathbf v}^2 \mathbf r} {\size {\math...
Let the [[Definition:Center of Circle|center]] of $C$ be placed at the [[Definition:Origin|origin]] of a two-dimensional [[Definition:Coordinate System|coordinate system]] where the [[Definition:Circle|circular path]] is in the [[Definition:XY Plane|$xy$ plane]]. Using the [[Equation of Circle/Parametric|parametric eq...
Acceleration of Particle moving in Circle at Constant Speed/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Acceleration_of_Particle_moving_in_Circle_at_Constant_Speed
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Acceleration_of_Particle_moving_in_Circle_at_Constant_Speed/Proof_1
[ "Acceleration of Particle moving in Circle at Constant Speed", "Acceleration", "Circles", "Physics" ]
[ "Definition:Particle", "Definition:Circle", "Definition:Constant Speed", "Definition:Acceleration", "Definition:Velocity", "Definition:Vector", "Definition:Magnitude", "Definition:Linear Measure/Length", "Definition:Circle/Radius", "Definition:Direction", "Definition:Circle/Center", "Definitio...
[ "Definition:Circle/Center", "Definition:Coordinate System/Origin", "Definition:Coordinate System", "Definition:Circle", "Definition:Cartesian Plane", "Equation of Circle/Parametric", "Definition:Position Vector", "Definition:Vector-Valued Function", "Definition:Constant", "Definition:Time", "Def...
proofwiki-16134
Closure of Hadamard Product
Let $\struct {S, \cdot}$ be an algebraic structure. Let $\map {\MM_S} {m, n}$ be a $m \times n$ matrix space over $S$. For $\mathbf A, \mathbf B \in \map {\MM_S} {m, n}$, let $\mathbf A \circ \mathbf B$ be defined as the Hadamard product of $\mathbf A$ and $\mathbf B$. The operation $\circ$ is closed on $\map {\MM_S} {...
=== Necessary Condition === Let the operation $\cdot$ be closed on $\struct {S, \cdot}$. Let $\mathbf A = \sqbrk a_{m n}$ and $\mathbf B = \sqbrk b_{m n}$ be elements of $\map {\MM_S} {m, n}$. Let $\sqbrk c_{m n} = \sqbrk a_{m n} \cdot \sqbrk b_{m n}$. Then: :$\forall i \in \closedint 1 m, j \in \closedint 1 n: c_{i j}...
Let $\struct {S, \cdot}$ be an [[Definition:Algebraic Structure with One Operation|algebraic structure]]. Let $\map {\MM_S} {m, n}$ be a [[Definition:Matrix Space|$m \times n$ matrix space]] over $S$. For $\mathbf A, \mathbf B \in \map {\MM_S} {m, n}$, let $\mathbf A \circ \mathbf B$ be defined as the [[Definition:Ha...
=== Necessary Condition === Let the [[Definition:Binary Operation|operation]] $\cdot$ be [[Definition:Closure (Abstract Algebra)|closed]] on $\struct {S, \cdot}$. Let $\mathbf A = \sqbrk a_{m n}$ and $\mathbf B = \sqbrk b_{m n}$ be [[Definition:Element|elements]] of $\map {\MM_S} {m, n}$. Let $\sqbrk c_{m n} = \sqbr...
Closure of Hadamard Product
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closure_of_Hadamard_Product
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closure_of_Hadamard_Product
[ "Hadamard Product" ]
[ "Definition:Algebraic Structure/One Operation", "Definition:Matrix Space", "Definition:Hadamard Product", "Definition:Closure (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Closure (Abstract Algebra)" ]
[ "Definition:Operation/Binary Operation", "Definition:Closure (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Closure (Abstract Algebra)/Algebraic Structure", "Definition:Hadamard Product", "Definition:Matrix/Order", "Definition:Closure (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Closure (Abstract Algebra)...
proofwiki-16135
Associativity of Hadamard Product
Let $\struct {S, \cdot}$ be an algebraic structure. Let $\map {\MM_S} {m, n}$ be a $m \times n$ matrix space over $S$. For $\mathbf A, \mathbf B \in \map {\MM_S} {m, n}$, let $\mathbf A \circ \mathbf B$ be defined as the Hadamard product of $\mathbf A$ and $\mathbf B$. The operation $\circ$ is associative on $\map {\MM...
=== Necessary Condition === Let the operation $\cdot$ be associative on $\struct {S, \cdot}$. Let $\mathbf A = \sqbrk a_{m n}$, $\mathbf B = \sqbrk b_{m n}$ and $\mathbf C = \sqbrk c_{m n}$ be elements of the $m \times n$ matrix space over $S$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {\mathbf A \circ \mathbf B} \circ \m...
Let $\struct {S, \cdot}$ be an [[Definition:Algebraic Structure with One Operation|algebraic structure]]. Let $\map {\MM_S} {m, n}$ be a [[Definition:Matrix Space|$m \times n$ matrix space]] over $S$. For $\mathbf A, \mathbf B \in \map {\MM_S} {m, n}$, let $\mathbf A \circ \mathbf B$ be defined as the [[Definition:Ha...
=== Necessary Condition === Let the [[Definition:Binary Operation|operation]] $\cdot$ be [[Definition:Associative Operation|associative]] on $\struct {S, \cdot}$. Let $\mathbf A = \sqbrk a_{m n}$, $\mathbf B = \sqbrk b_{m n}$ and $\mathbf C = \sqbrk c_{m n}$ be [[Definition:Element|elements]] of the [[Definition:Matr...
Associativity of Hadamard Product
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Associativity_of_Hadamard_Product
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Associativity_of_Hadamard_Product
[ "Hadamard Product", "Examples of Associative Operations" ]
[ "Definition:Algebraic Structure/One Operation", "Definition:Matrix Space", "Definition:Hadamard Product", "Definition:Associative Operation", "Definition:Associative Operation" ]
[ "Definition:Operation/Binary Operation", "Definition:Associative Operation", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Matrix Space", "Definition:Associative Operation", "Definition:Associative Operation", "Definition:Associative Operation", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Associative Operation" ]
proofwiki-16136
Commutativity of Hadamard Product
Let $\struct {S, \cdot}$ be an algebraic structure. Let $\map {\MM_S} {m, n}$ be a $m \times n$ matrix space over $S$. For $\mathbf A, \mathbf B \in \map {\MM_S} {m, n}$, let $\mathbf A \circ \mathbf B$ be defined as the Hadamard product of $\mathbf A$ and $\mathbf B$. The operation $\circ$ is commutative on $\map {\MM...
=== Necessary Condition === Let the operation $\cdot$ be commutative on $\struct {S, \cdot}$. Let $\mathbf A = \sqbrk a_{m n}$ and $\mathbf B = \sqbrk b_{m n}$ be elements of the $m \times n$ matrix space over $S$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf A \circ \mathbf B | r = \sqbrk a_{m n} \circ \sqbrk b_{m n}...
Let $\struct {S, \cdot}$ be an [[Definition:Algebraic Structure with One Operation|algebraic structure]]. Let $\map {\MM_S} {m, n}$ be a [[Definition:Matrix Space|$m \times n$ matrix space]] over $S$. For $\mathbf A, \mathbf B \in \map {\MM_S} {m, n}$, let $\mathbf A \circ \mathbf B$ be defined as the [[Definition:Ha...
=== Necessary Condition === Let the [[Definition:Binary Operation|operation]] $\cdot$ be [[Definition:Commutative Operation|commutative]] on $\struct {S, \cdot}$. Let $\mathbf A = \sqbrk a_{m n}$ and $\mathbf B = \sqbrk b_{m n}$ be [[Definition:Element|elements]] of the [[Definition:Matrix Space|$m \times n$ matrix s...
Commutativity of Hadamard Product
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Commutativity_of_Hadamard_Product
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Commutativity_of_Hadamard_Product
[ "Hadamard Product", "Examples of Commutative Operations" ]
[ "Definition:Algebraic Structure/One Operation", "Definition:Matrix Space", "Definition:Hadamard Product", "Definition:Commutative/Operation", "Definition:Commutative/Operation" ]
[ "Definition:Operation/Binary Operation", "Definition:Commutative/Operation", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Matrix Space", "Definition:Commutative/Operation", "Definition:Commutative/Operation", "Definition:Commutative/Operation", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Commutative/Operation" ]
proofwiki-16137
Matrix Entrywise Addition over Ring is Closed
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a ring. Let $\map {\MM_R} {m, n}$ be a $m \times n$ matrix space over $R$. For $\mathbf A, \mathbf B \in \map {\MM_R} {m, n}$, let $\mathbf A + \mathbf B$ be defined as the matrix entrywise sum of $\mathbf A$ and $\mathbf B$. The operation $+$ is closed on $\map {\MM_R} {m, n}$.
Let $\mathbf A = \sqbrk a_{m n}$ and $\mathbf B = \sqbrk b_{m n}$ be elements of $\map {\MM_R} {m, n}$. Let $\sqbrk c_{m n} = \sqbrk a_{m n} + \sqbrk b_{m n}$. By definition of matrix entrywise addition: :$\forall i \in \closedint 1 m, j \in \closedint 1 n: a_{i j} + b_{i j} = c_{i j}$ By {{Ring-axiom|A0}}, $R$ is clos...
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)|ring]]. Let $\map {\MM_R} {m, n}$ be a [[Definition:Matrix Space|$m \times n$ matrix space]] over $R$. For $\mathbf A, \mathbf B \in \map {\MM_R} {m, n}$, let $\mathbf A + \mathbf B$ be defined as the [[Definition:Matrix Entrywise Addition over Rin...
Let $\mathbf A = \sqbrk a_{m n}$ and $\mathbf B = \sqbrk b_{m n}$ be [[Definition:Element|elements]] of $\map {\MM_R} {m, n}$. Let $\sqbrk c_{m n} = \sqbrk a_{m n} + \sqbrk b_{m n}$. By definition of [[Definition:Matrix Entrywise Addition|matrix entrywise addition]]: :$\forall i \in \closedint 1 m, j \in \closedint 1...
Matrix Entrywise Addition over Ring is Closed/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Matrix_Entrywise_Addition_over_Ring_is_Closed
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Matrix_Entrywise_Addition_over_Ring_is_Closed/Proof_1
[ "Matrix Entrywise Addition", "Algebraic Closure", "Matrix Entrywise Addition is Closed" ]
[ "Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Matrix Space", "Definition:Matrix Entrywise Addition/Ring", "Definition:Closure (Abstract Algebra)" ]
[ "Definition:Element", "Definition:Matrix Entrywise Addition", "Definition:Closure (Abstract Algebra)/Algebraic Structure", "Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)/Addition", "Definition:Matrix Entrywise Addition", "Definition:Matrix/Order", "Definition:Closure (Abstract Algebra)" ]
proofwiki-16138
Matrix Entrywise Addition over Ring is Closed
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a ring. Let $\map {\MM_R} {m, n}$ be a $m \times n$ matrix space over $R$. For $\mathbf A, \mathbf B \in \map {\MM_R} {m, n}$, let $\mathbf A + \mathbf B$ be defined as the matrix entrywise sum of $\mathbf A$ and $\mathbf B$. The operation $+$ is closed on $\map {\MM_R} {m, n}$.
By definition, matrix entrywise addition is the '''Hadamard product''' of $\mathbf A$ and $\mathbf B$ with respect to ring addition. We have from {{Ring-axiom|A0}} that ring addition is closed. The result then follows directly from Closure of Hadamard Product. {{qed}}
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)|ring]]. Let $\map {\MM_R} {m, n}$ be a [[Definition:Matrix Space|$m \times n$ matrix space]] over $R$. For $\mathbf A, \mathbf B \in \map {\MM_R} {m, n}$, let $\mathbf A + \mathbf B$ be defined as the [[Definition:Matrix Entrywise Addition over Rin...
By definition, [[Definition:Matrix Entrywise Addition|matrix entrywise addition]] is the '''[[Definition:Hadamard Product|Hadamard product]]''' of $\mathbf A$ and $\mathbf B$ with respect to [[Definition:Ring Addition|ring addition]]. We have from {{Ring-axiom|A0}} that [[Definition:Ring Addition|ring addition]] is [[...
Matrix Entrywise Addition over Ring is Closed/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Matrix_Entrywise_Addition_over_Ring_is_Closed
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Matrix_Entrywise_Addition_over_Ring_is_Closed/Proof_2
[ "Matrix Entrywise Addition", "Algebraic Closure", "Matrix Entrywise Addition is Closed" ]
[ "Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Matrix Space", "Definition:Matrix Entrywise Addition/Ring", "Definition:Closure (Abstract Algebra)" ]
[ "Definition:Matrix Entrywise Addition", "Definition:Hadamard Product", "Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)/Addition", "Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)/Addition", "Definition:Closure (Abstract Algebra)/Algebraic Structure", "Closure of Hadamard Product" ]
proofwiki-16139
Points are Path-Connected iff Contained in Path-Connected Set
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $x, y \in S$ Then: :$x, y$ are path-connected points in $T$ {{iff}} there exists a path-connected set of $T$ containing $x$ and $y$.
=== Necessary Condition === Let $x, y$ be path-connected points in $T$. Let $\gamma: \closedint 0 1 \to T$ be a path from $x$ to $y$. From Image of Path is Path-Connected Set, $\Img \gamma$ is a path-connected set of $T$ containing $x$ and $y$. The result follows. {{qed|lemma}}
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $x, y \in S$ Then: :$x, y$ are [[Definition:Path-Connected Points|path-connected points]] in $T$ {{iff}} there exists a [[Definition:Path-Connected Set|path-connected set]] of $T$ containing $x$ and $y$.
=== Necessary Condition === Let $x, y$ be [[Definition:Path-Connected Points|path-connected points]] in $T$. Let $\gamma: \closedint 0 1 \to T$ be a [[Definition:Path (Topology)|path]] from $x$ to $y$. From [[Image of Path is Path-Connected Set]], $\Img \gamma$ is a [[Definition:Path-Connected Set|path-connected set...
Points are Path-Connected iff Contained in Path-Connected Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Points_are_Path-Connected_iff_Contained_in_Path-Connected_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Points_are_Path-Connected_iff_Contained_in_Path-Connected_Set
[ "Path-Connected Points", "Path-Connected Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Path-Connected/Points", "Definition:Path-Connected/Set" ]
[ "Definition:Path-Connected/Points", "Definition:Path (Topology)", "Image of Path is Path-Connected Set", "Definition:Path-Connected/Set", "Definition:Path-Connected/Set", "Definition:Path (Topology)", "Definition:Path (Topology)" ]
proofwiki-16140
Equivalence of Definitions of Path Component/Union of Path-Connected Sets is Maximal Path-Connected Set
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $x \in T$. Let $\CC_x = \leftset {A \subseteq S : x \in A \land A}$ is path-connected in $\rightset T$ Let $C = \bigcup \CC_x$ Then $C$ is a maximal path-connected set of $T$.
Let $\tilde C$ be an arbitrary path-connected set such that: :$C \subseteq \tilde C$ Then $x \in \tilde C$. Hence $\tilde C \in \CC_x$. From Set is Subset of Union, :$\tilde C \subseteq C$. Hence $\tilde C = C$. It follows that $C$ is a maximal path-connected set of $T$ by definition.
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $x \in T$. Let $\CC_x = \leftset {A \subseteq S : x \in A \land A}$ is [[Definition:Path-Connected Set|path-connected]] in $\rightset T$ Let $C = \bigcup \CC_x$ Then $C$ is a [[Definition:Maximal Set|maximal]] [[Definition:Pat...
Let $\tilde C$ be an arbitrary [[Definition:Path-Connected Set|path-connected set]] such that: :$C \subseteq \tilde C$ Then $x \in \tilde C$. Hence $\tilde C \in \CC_x$. From [[Set is Subset of Union]], :$\tilde C \subseteq C$. Hence $\tilde C = C$. It follows that $C$ is a [[Definition:Maximal Set|maximal]] [[De...
Equivalence of Definitions of Path Component/Union of Path-Connected Sets is Maximal Path-Connected Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Path_Component/Union_of_Path-Connected_Sets_is_Maximal_Path-Connected_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Path_Component/Union_of_Path-Connected_Sets_is_Maximal_Path-Connected_Set
[ "Equivalence of Definitions of Path Component" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Path-Connected/Set", "Definition:Maximal/Set", "Definition:Path-Connected/Set" ]
[ "Definition:Path-Connected/Set", "Set is Subset of Union", "Definition:Maximal/Set", "Definition:Path-Connected/Set" ]
proofwiki-16141
Solutions to Diophantine Equation 16x^2+32x+20 = y^2+y
The indeterminate Diophantine equation: :$16x^2 + 32x + 20 = y^2 + y$ has exactly $4$ solutions: :$\tuple {0, 4}, \tuple {-2, 4}, \tuple {0, -5}, \tuple {-2, -5}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 16 x^2 + 32 x + 20 | r = y^2 + y | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = 16 x^2 + 32 x + 16 + 4 | r = | c = }} {{eqn | l = 16 \paren {x^2 + 2 x + 1} + 4 | r = | c = }} {{eqn | l = 16 \paren {x + 1}^2 + 4 | r = y^2 + y | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \lea...
The [[Definition:Indeterminate Equation|indeterminate]] [[Definition:Diophantine Equation|Diophantine equation]]: :$16x^2 + 32x + 20 = y^2 + y$ has exactly $4$ solutions: :$\tuple {0, 4}, \tuple {-2, 4}, \tuple {0, -5}, \tuple {-2, -5}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 16 x^2 + 32 x + 20 | r = y^2 + y | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = 16 x^2 + 32 x + 16 + 4 | r = | c = }} {{eqn | l = 16 \paren {x^2 + 2 x + 1} + 4 | r = | c = }} {{eqn | l = 16 \paren {x + 1}^2 + 4 | r = y^2 + y | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \lea...
Solutions to Diophantine Equation 16x^2+32x+20 = y^2+y
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Solutions_to_Diophantine_Equation_16x^2+32x+20_=_y^2+y
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Solutions_to_Diophantine_Equation_16x^2+32x+20_=_y^2+y
[ "Diophantine Equations" ]
[ "Definition:Indeterminate Equation", "Definition:Diophantine Equation" ]
[ "Definition:Prime Number" ]
proofwiki-16142
Equivalence of Definitions of Path Component/Maximal Path-Connected Set is Union of Path-Connected Sets
Let $\tilde C$ be a maximal path-connected set of $T$ that contains $x$.
By definition: :$\tilde C \in \CC_x$ From Set is Subset of Union: :$\tilde C \subseteq C$ By maximality of $\tilde C$: :$\tilde C = C$
Let $\tilde C$ be a [[Definition:Maximal Set|maximal]] [[Definition:Path-Connected Set|path-connected set]] of $T$ that contains $x$.
By definition: :$\tilde C \in \CC_x$ From [[Set is Subset of Union]]: :$\tilde C \subseteq C$ By [[Definition:Maximal Set|maximality]] of $\tilde C$: :$\tilde C = C$
Equivalence of Definitions of Path Component/Maximal Path-Connected Set is Union of Path-Connected Sets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Path_Component/Maximal_Path-Connected_Set_is_Union_of_Path-Connected_Sets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Path_Component/Maximal_Path-Connected_Set_is_Union_of_Path-Connected_Sets
[ "Equivalence of Definitions of Path Component" ]
[ "Definition:Maximal/Set", "Definition:Path-Connected/Set" ]
[ "Set is Subset of Union", "Definition:Maximal/Set" ]
proofwiki-16143
Power Set is Closed under Set Complement
Let $S$ be a set. Let $\powerset S$ be the power set of $S$. Then: :$\forall A \in \powerset S: \relcomp S A \in \powerset S$
Let $A \in \powerset S$. Then by the definition of power set, $A \subseteq S$. By definition of relative complement: :$\relcomp S A = \set {x \in S: x \notin A}$ Hence $\relcomp S A$ is a subset of $S$. That is: :$\relcomp S A \in \powerset S$ and closure is proved. {{qed}}
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. Let $\powerset S$ be the [[Definition:Power Set|power set]] of $S$. Then: :$\forall A \in \powerset S: \relcomp S A \in \powerset S$
Let $A \in \powerset S$. Then by the definition of [[Definition:Power Set|power set]], $A \subseteq S$. By definition of [[Definition:Relative Complement|relative complement]]: :$\relcomp S A = \set {x \in S: x \notin A}$ Hence $\relcomp S A$ is a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $S$. That is: :$\relcomp S A \in \po...
Power Set is Closed under Set Complement
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Power_Set_is_Closed_under_Set_Complement
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Power_Set_is_Closed_under_Set_Complement
[ "Power Set", "Set Complement" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Power Set" ]
[ "Definition:Power Set", "Definition:Relative Complement", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Closure (Abstract Algebra)" ]
proofwiki-16144
Normal Subgroup of Symmetric Group on More than 4 Letters is Alternating Group
Let $n \in \N$ be a natural number such that $n > 4$. Let $S_n$ denote the symmetric group on $n$ letters. Let $A_n$ denote the alternating group on $n$ letters. $A_n$ is the only proper non-trivial normal subgroup of $S_n$.
From Alternating Group is Normal Subgroup of Symmetric Group, $A_n$ is seen to be normal in $S_n$. It remains to be shown that $A_n$ is the only such normal subgroup of $S_n$. {{AimForCont}} $N$ is a proper non-trivial normal subgroup of $S_n$ such that $N$ is a proper subset of $A_n$. From Intersection with Normal Sub...
Let $n \in \N$ be a [[Definition:Natural Number|natural number]] such that $n > 4$. Let $S_n$ denote the [[Definition:Symmetric Group on n Letters|symmetric group on $n$ letters]]. Let $A_n$ denote the [[Definition:Alternating Group|alternating group on $n$ letters]]. $A_n$ is the only [[Definition:Non-Trivial Prop...
From [[Alternating Group is Normal Subgroup of Symmetric Group]], $A_n$ is seen to be [[Definition:Normal Subgroup|normal]] in $S_n$. It remains to be shown that $A_n$ is the only such [[Definition:Normal Subgroup|normal subgroup]] of $S_n$. {{AimForCont}} $N$ is a [[Definition:Non-Trivial Proper Subgroup|proper non...
Normal Subgroup of Symmetric Group on More than 4 Letters is Alternating Group
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Normal_Subgroup_of_Symmetric_Group_on_More_than_4_Letters_is_Alternating_Group
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Normal_Subgroup_of_Symmetric_Group_on_More_than_4_Letters_is_Alternating_Group
[ "Alternating Groups", "Symmetric Groups", "Examples of Normal Subgroups" ]
[ "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Symmetric Group/n Letters", "Definition:Alternating Group", "Definition:Proper Subgroup/Non-Trivial", "Definition:Normal Subgroup" ]
[ "Alternating Group is Normal Subgroup of Symmetric Group", "Definition:Normal Subgroup", "Definition:Normal Subgroup", "Definition:Proper Subgroup/Non-Trivial", "Definition:Normal Subgroup", "Definition:Proper Subset", "Intersection with Normal Subgroup is Normal", "Definition:Normal Subgroup", "Int...
proofwiki-16145
Path Components are Open iff Union of Open Path-Connected Sets/Path Components are Open implies Space is Union of Open Path-Connected Sets
Let the path components of $T$ be open sets.
By definition, the path components of $T$ are a partition of $S$. Hence $S$ is the union of the open path components of $T$. Since a path component is a maximal path-connected set by definition, then $S$ is a union of open path-connected sets of $T$.
Let the [[Definition:Path Component|path components]] of $T$ be [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open sets]].
By definition, the [[Definition:Path Component|path components]] of $T$ are a [[Definition:Set Partition|partition]] of $S$. Hence $S$ is the [[Definition:Set Union|union]] of the [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open]] [[Definition:Path Component|path components]] of $T$. Since a [[Definition:Path Component|path com...
Path Components are Open iff Union of Open Path-Connected Sets/Path Components are Open implies Space is Union of Open Path-Connected Sets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Path_Components_are_Open_iff_Union_of_Open_Path-Connected_Sets/Path_Components_are_Open_implies_Space_is_Union_of_Open_Path-Connected_Sets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Path_Components_are_Open_iff_Union_of_Open_Path-Connected_Sets/Path_Components_are_Open_implies_Space_is_Union_of_Open_Path-Connected_Sets
[ "Path Components are Open iff Union of Open Path-Connected Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Path Component", "Definition:Open Set/Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Path Component", "Definition:Set Partition", "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Path Component", "Definition:Path Component", "Definition:Path Component/Maximal Path-Connected Set", "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Pat...
proofwiki-16146
Path Components are Open iff Union of Open Path-Connected Sets/Space is Union of Open Path-Connected Sets implies Path Components are Open
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $S$ be the union of open path-connected sets of $T$. Then: :The path components of $T$ are open sets.
Let $S = \ds \bigcup \set {U \subseteq S : U \in \tau \text { and } U \text { is path-connected} }$. Let $C$ be a path component of $T$. === Lemma === {{:Path Components are Open iff Union of Open Path-Connected Sets/Lemma}}{{qed|lemma}} Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = C | r = C \cap S | c = Intersection wi...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $S$ be the [[Definition:Set Union|union]] of [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open]] [[Definition:Path-Connected Set|path-connected sets]] of $T$. Then: :The [[Definition:Path Component|path components]] of $T$ are [[Definition:...
Let $S = \ds \bigcup \set {U \subseteq S : U \in \tau \text { and } U \text { is path-connected} }$. Let $C$ be a [[Definition:Path Component|path component]] of $T$. === [[Path Components are Open iff Union of Open Path-Connected Sets/Lemma|Lemma]] === {{:Path Components are Open iff Union of Open Path-Connected Se...
Path Components are Open iff Union of Open Path-Connected Sets/Space is Union of Open Path-Connected Sets implies Path Components are Open
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Path_Components_are_Open_iff_Union_of_Open_Path-Connected_Sets/Space_is_Union_of_Open_Path-Connected_Sets_implies_Path_Components_are_Open
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Path_Components_are_Open_iff_Union_of_Open_Path-Connected_Sets/Space_is_Union_of_Open_Path-Connected_Sets_implies_Path_Components_are_Open
[ "Path Components are Open iff Union of Open Path-Connected Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Path-Connected/Set", "Definition:Path Component", "Definition:Open Set/Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Path Component", "Path Components are Open iff Union of Open Path-Connected Sets/Lemma", "Intersection with Subset is Subset", "Intersection Distributes over Union", "Union with Empty Set", "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definitio...
proofwiki-16147
Path Components are Open iff Union of Open Path-Connected Sets/Lemma
Let $U$ be a path-connected set of $T$. Then: :$U \cap C \ne \O$ {{iff}} $U \ne \O$ and $U \subseteq C$
=== Necessary Condition === Let $U \cap C \ne \O$. From Union of Path-Connected Sets with Common Point is Path-Connected, $U \cup C$ is a path-connected set of $T$. From Set is Subset of Union, $C \subseteq U \cup C$. By definition of a path component, $C$ is a maximal path-connected set. Hence $C = U \cup C$. From Uni...
Let $U$ be a [[Definition:Path-Connected Set|path-connected set]] of $T$. Then: :$U \cap C \ne \O$ {{iff}} $U \ne \O$ and $U \subseteq C$
=== Necessary Condition === Let $U \cap C \ne \O$. From [[Union of Path-Connected Sets with Common Point is Path-Connected]], $U \cup C$ is a [[Definition:Path-Connected Set|path-connected set]] of $T$. From [[Set is Subset of Union]], $C \subseteq U \cup C$. By definition of a [[Definition:Path Component/Maximal P...
Path Components are Open iff Union of Open Path-Connected Sets/Lemma
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Path_Components_are_Open_iff_Union_of_Open_Path-Connected_Sets/Lemma
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Path_Components_are_Open_iff_Union_of_Open_Path-Connected_Sets/Lemma
[ "Path Components are Open iff Union of Open Path-Connected Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Path-Connected/Set" ]
[ "Union of Path-Connected Sets with Common Point is Path-Connected", "Definition:Path-Connected/Set", "Set is Subset of Union", "Definition:Path Component/Maximal Path-Connected Set", "Definition:Maximal", "Definition:Path-Connected/Set", "Union with Superset is Superset", "Intersection with Subset is ...
proofwiki-16148
Components are Open iff Union of Open Connected Sets/Components are Open implies Space is Union of Open Connected Sets
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let the components of $T$ be open sets. Then: :$S$ is a union of open connected sets of $T$.
Let the components of $T$ be open. By definition, the components of $T$ are a partition of $S$. Hence $S$ is the union of the open components of $T$. Since a component is a maximal connected set by definition, then $S$ is a union of open connected sets of $T$.
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let the [[Definition:Component (Topology)|components]] of $T$ be [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open sets]]. Then: :$S$ is a [[Definition:Set Union|union]] of [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open]] [[Definition:Connected Set (Top...
Let the [[Definition:Component (Topology)|components]] of $T$ be [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open]]. By definition, the [[Definition:Component (Topology)|components]] of $T$ are a [[Definition:Set Partition|partition]] of $S$. Hence $S$ is the [[Definition:Set Union|union]] of the [[Definition:Open Set (Topology...
Components are Open iff Union of Open Connected Sets/Components are Open implies Space is Union of Open Connected Sets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Components_are_Open_iff_Union_of_Open_Connected_Sets/Components_are_Open_implies_Space_is_Union_of_Open_Connected_Sets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Components_are_Open_iff_Union_of_Open_Connected_Sets/Components_are_Open_implies_Space_is_Union_of_Open_Connected_Sets
[ "Components are Open iff Union of Open Connected Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Component (Topology)", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)" ]
[ "Definition:Component (Topology)", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Component (Topology)", "Definition:Set Partition", "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Component (Topology)", "Definition:Component (Topology)", "Definition:Maximal/Set", "Definition:Conn...
proofwiki-16149
Components are Open iff Union of Open Connected Sets/Space is Union of Open Connected Sets implies Components are Open
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $S$ be a union of open connected sets of $T$. Then: :The components of $T$ are open sets.
Let $S = \ds \bigcup \set {U \subseteq S : U \in \tau \text { and } U \text { is connected} }$. Let $C$ be a component of $T$. === Lemma === :For any connected set $U$ then: {{:Components are Open iff Union of Open Connected Sets/Lemma 1}}{{qed|lemma}} Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = C | r = C \cap S | c = ...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Set Union|union]] of [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open]] [[Definition:Connected Set (Topology)|connected sets]] of $T$. Then: :The [[Definition:Component (Topology)|components]] of $T$ are [[Definition:...
Let $S = \ds \bigcup \set {U \subseteq S : U \in \tau \text { and } U \text { is connected} }$. Let $C$ be a [[Definition:Component (Topology)|component]] of $T$. === [[Components are Open iff Union of Open Connected Sets/Lemma 1|Lemma]] === :For any [[Definition:Connected Set (Topology)|connected set]] $U$ then: {...
Components are Open iff Union of Open Connected Sets/Space is Union of Open Connected Sets implies Components are Open
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Components_are_Open_iff_Union_of_Open_Connected_Sets/Space_is_Union_of_Open_Connected_Sets_implies_Components_are_Open
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Components_are_Open_iff_Union_of_Open_Connected_Sets/Space_is_Union_of_Open_Connected_Sets_implies_Components_are_Open
[ "Components are Open iff Union of Open Connected Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)", "Definition:Component (Topology)", "Definition:Open Set/Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Component (Topology)", "Components are Open iff Union of Open Connected Sets/Lemma 1", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)", "Intersection with Subset is Subset", "Intersection Distributes over Union", "Union with Empty Set", "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Defi...
proofwiki-16150
Components are Open iff Union of Open Connected Sets/Lemma 1
::$U \cap C \ne \O$ {{iff}} $U \ne \O$ and $U \subseteq C$
=== Necessary Condition === Let $U \cap C \ne \O$. From Union of Connected Sets with Common Point is Connected, $U \cup C$ is a connected set of $T$. From Set is Subset of Union, $C \subseteq U \cup C$. By definition of a component, $C$ is a maximal connected set. Hence $C = U \cup C$. From Union with Superset is Super...
::$U \cap C \ne \O$ {{iff}} $U \ne \O$ and $U \subseteq C$
=== Necessary Condition === Let $U \cap C \ne \O$. From [[Union of Connected Sets with Common Point is Connected]], $U \cup C$ is a [[Definition:Connected Set (Topology)|connected set]] of $T$. From [[Set is Subset of Union]], $C \subseteq U \cup C$. By definition of a [[Definition:Component (Topology)/Definition 3...
Components are Open iff Union of Open Connected Sets/Lemma 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Components_are_Open_iff_Union_of_Open_Connected_Sets/Lemma_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Components_are_Open_iff_Union_of_Open_Connected_Sets/Lemma_1
[ "Components are Open iff Union of Open Connected Sets" ]
[]
[ "Union of Connected Sets with Common Point is Connected", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)", "Set is Subset of Union", "Definition:Component (Topology)/Definition 3", "Definition:Maximal", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)", "Union with Superset is Superset", "Intersection with Subset is Subset...
proofwiki-16151
Integral to Infinity of Square of Sine p x over x Squared
:$\ds \int_0^\infty \paren {\frac {\sin p x} x}^2 \rd x = \frac {\pi \size p} 2$
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\frac \d {\d x} } {\sin^2 p x} | r = \map {\frac \d {\d x} } {\sin p x} \map {\frac \d {\map \d {\sin p x} } } {\sin^2 p x} | c = Chain Rule for Derivatives }} {{eqn | r = 2 p \cos p x \sin p x | c = Derivative of Sine of a x, Derivative of Power }} {{eqn | r ...
:$\ds \int_0^\infty \paren {\frac {\sin p x} x}^2 \rd x = \frac {\pi \size p} 2$
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\frac \d {\d x} } {\sin^2 p x} | r = \map {\frac \d {\d x} } {\sin p x} \map {\frac \d {\map \d {\sin p x} } } {\sin^2 p x} | c = [[Chain Rule for Derivatives]] }} {{eqn | r = 2 p \cos p x \sin p x | c = [[Derivative of Sine of a x]], [[Derivative of Power]] ...
Integral to Infinity of Square of Sine p x over x Squared
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integral_to_Infinity_of_Square_of_Sine_p_x_over_x_Squared
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integral_to_Infinity_of_Square_of_Sine_p_x_over_x_Squared
[ "Definite Integrals involving Sine Function" ]
[]
[ "Derivative of Composite Function", "Derivative of Sine Function/Corollary", "Power Rule for Derivatives", "Double Angle Formulas/Sine", "Primitive of Power", "Integration by Parts", "Real Sine Function is Bounded", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Strictly Positive/Real Number", "Squeeze The...
proofwiki-16152
Integral to Infinity of One minus Cosine p x over x Squared
:$\ds \int_0^\infty \frac {1 - \cos p x} {x^2} \rd x = \frac {\pi \size p} 2$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int_0^\infty \frac {1 - \cos p x} {x^2} \rd x | r = \int_0^\infty \frac {2 \sin^2 \paren {\frac {p x} 2} } {x^2} \rd x | c = Square of Sine }} {{eqn | r = 2 \times \frac {\pi \size p} {2 \times 2} | c = Integral to Infinity of $\paren {\dfrac {\sin p x} x}^2$ }} {{eqn | r = \frac {\pi \siz...
:$\ds \int_0^\infty \frac {1 - \cos p x} {x^2} \rd x = \frac {\pi \size p} 2$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int_0^\infty \frac {1 - \cos p x} {x^2} \rd x | r = \int_0^\infty \frac {2 \sin^2 \paren {\frac {p x} 2} } {x^2} \rd x | c = [[Square of Sine]] }} {{eqn | r = 2 \times \frac {\pi \size p} {2 \times 2} | c = [[Integral to Infinity of Square of Sine p x over x Squared|Integral to Infinity of...
Integral to Infinity of One minus Cosine p x over x Squared
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integral_to_Infinity_of_One_minus_Cosine_p_x_over_x_Squared
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integral_to_Infinity_of_One_minus_Cosine_p_x_over_x_Squared
[ "Definite Integrals involving Cosine Function" ]
[]
[ "Power Reduction Formulas/Sine Squared", "Integral to Infinity of Square of Sine p x over x Squared" ]
proofwiki-16153
1 can be Expressed as Sum of 4 Distinct Unit Fractions in 6 Ways
The number $1$ can be expressed as the sum of $4$ distinct unit fractions in $6$ different ways: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1 | r = \frac 1 2 + \frac 1 3 + \frac 1 7 + \frac 1 {42} }} {{eqn | r = \frac 1 2 + \frac 1 3 + \frac 1 8 + \frac 1 {24} }} {{eqn | r = \frac 1 2 + \frac 1 3 + \frac 1 9 + \frac 1 {18} }} {{e...
Let: :$1 = \dfrac 1 v + \dfrac 1 w + \dfrac 1 x + \dfrac 1 y$ where $ 1 < v < w < x < y$ Suppose $v = 3$ and take the largest potential solution that can be generated: :$1 \stackrel {?} {=} \dfrac 1 3 + \dfrac 1 4 + \dfrac 1 5 + \dfrac 1 6$ But we find: :$1 > \dfrac 1 3 + \dfrac 1 4 + \dfrac 1 5 + \dfrac 1 6$ Therefore...
The number $1$ can be expressed as the [[Definition:Sum (Addition)|sum]] of $4$ [[Definition:Distinct|distinct]] [[Definition:Unit Fraction|unit fractions]] in $6$ different ways: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1 | r = \frac 1 2 + \frac 1 3 + \frac 1 7 + \frac 1 {42} }} {{eqn | r = \frac 1 2 + \frac 1 3 + \frac 1 8 +...
Let: :$1 = \dfrac 1 v + \dfrac 1 w + \dfrac 1 x + \dfrac 1 y$ where $ 1 < v < w < x < y$ Suppose $v = 3$ and take the largest potential solution that can be generated: :$1 \stackrel {?} {=} \dfrac 1 3 + \dfrac 1 4 + \dfrac 1 5 + \dfrac 1 6$ But we find: :$1 > \dfrac 1 3 + \dfrac 1 4 + \dfrac 1 5 + \dfrac 1 6$ Ther...
1 can be Expressed as Sum of 4 Distinct Unit Fractions in 6 Ways/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/1_can_be_Expressed_as_Sum_of_4_Distinct_Unit_Fractions_in_6_Ways
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/1_can_be_Expressed_as_Sum_of_4_Distinct_Unit_Fractions_in_6_Ways/Proof_1
[ "1", "Unit Fractions", "Recreational Mathematics", "1 can be Expressed as Sum of 4 Distinct Unit Fractions in 6 Ways" ]
[ "Definition:Addition/Sum", "Definition:Distinct", "Definition:Unit Fraction" ]
[]
proofwiki-16154
1 can be Expressed as Sum of 4 Distinct Unit Fractions in 6 Ways
The number $1$ can be expressed as the sum of $4$ distinct unit fractions in $6$ different ways: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1 | r = \frac 1 2 + \frac 1 3 + \frac 1 7 + \frac 1 {42} }} {{eqn | r = \frac 1 2 + \frac 1 3 + \frac 1 8 + \frac 1 {24} }} {{eqn | r = \frac 1 2 + \frac 1 3 + \frac 1 9 + \frac 1 {18} }} {{e...
From Sum of 4 Unit Fractions that equals 1: {{:Sum of 4 Unit Fractions that equals 1}} This includes repeated unit fractions. The full list is: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | r = \dfrac 1 2 + \dfrac 1 3 + \dfrac 1 7 + \dfrac 1 {42} | o = }} {{eqn | n = 2 | r = \dfrac 1 2 + \dfrac 1 3 + \dfrac 1 8 + \d...
The number $1$ can be expressed as the [[Definition:Sum (Addition)|sum]] of $4$ [[Definition:Distinct|distinct]] [[Definition:Unit Fraction|unit fractions]] in $6$ different ways: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1 | r = \frac 1 2 + \frac 1 3 + \frac 1 7 + \frac 1 {42} }} {{eqn | r = \frac 1 2 + \frac 1 3 + \frac 1 8 +...
From [[Sum of 4 Unit Fractions that equals 1]]: {{:Sum of 4 Unit Fractions that equals 1}} This includes repeated [[Definition:Unit Fraction|unit fractions]]. The full list is: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | r = \dfrac 1 2 + \dfrac 1 3 + \dfrac 1 7 + \dfrac 1 {42} | o = }} {{eqn | n = 2 | r = \dfr...
1 can be Expressed as Sum of 4 Distinct Unit Fractions in 6 Ways/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/1_can_be_Expressed_as_Sum_of_4_Distinct_Unit_Fractions_in_6_Ways
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/1_can_be_Expressed_as_Sum_of_4_Distinct_Unit_Fractions_in_6_Ways/Proof_2
[ "1", "Unit Fractions", "Recreational Mathematics", "1 can be Expressed as Sum of 4 Distinct Unit Fractions in 6 Ways" ]
[ "Definition:Addition/Sum", "Definition:Distinct", "Definition:Unit Fraction" ]
[ "Sum of 4 Unit Fractions that equals 1", "Definition:Unit Fraction", "Definition:Fraction/Denominator", "Definition:Addition/Summand", "Definition:Distinct" ]
proofwiki-16155
Equivalence of Definitions of Weakly Locally Connected at Point
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $x \in S$. {{TFAE|def = Weakly Locally Connected at Point}}
=== Definition 1 implies Definition 2 === {{:Equivalence of Definitions of Weakly Locally Connected at Point/Definition 1 implies Definition 2}}{{qed|lemma}}
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $x \in S$. {{TFAE|def = Weakly Locally Connected at Point}}
=== [[Equivalence of Definitions of Weakly Locally Connected at Point/Definition 1 implies Definition 2|Definition 1 implies Definition 2]] === {{:Equivalence of Definitions of Weakly Locally Connected at Point/Definition 1 implies Definition 2}}{{qed|lemma}}
Equivalence of Definitions of Weakly Locally Connected at Point
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Weakly_Locally_Connected_at_Point
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Weakly_Locally_Connected_at_Point
[ "Locally Connected Spaces", "Equivalence of Definitions of Weakly Locally Connected at Point" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space" ]
[ "Equivalence of Definitions of Weakly Locally Connected at Point/Definition 1 implies Definition 2" ]
proofwiki-16156
Integral to Infinity of Cosine p x minus Cosine q x over x
:$\ds \int_0^\infty \frac {\cos p x - \cos q x} x \rd x = \ln \frac q p$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int_0^\infty \frac {\cos p x - \cos q x} x \rd x | r = \int_0^\infty \map {\laptrans {\cos p t - \cos q t} } x \rd x | c = Integral to Infinity of Function over Argument, assuming both integrals converge }} {{eqn | r = \int_0^\infty \frac x {x^2 + p^2} - \frac x {x^2 + q^2} \rd x ...
:$\ds \int_0^\infty \frac {\cos p x - \cos q x} x \rd x = \ln \frac q p$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int_0^\infty \frac {\cos p x - \cos q x} x \rd x | r = \int_0^\infty \map {\laptrans {\cos p t - \cos q t} } x \rd x | c = [[Integral to Infinity of Function over Argument]], assuming both [[Definition:Definite Integral|integrals]] converge }} {{eqn | r = \int_0^\infty \frac x {x^...
Integral to Infinity of Cosine p x minus Cosine q x over x
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integral_to_Infinity_of_Cosine_p_x_minus_Cosine_q_x_over_x
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integral_to_Infinity_of_Cosine_p_x_minus_Cosine_q_x_over_x
[ "Definite Integrals involving Cosine Function" ]
[]
[ "Integral to Infinity of Function over Argument", "Definition:Definite Integral", "Laplace Transform of Cosine", "Primitive of x over x squared plus a squared", "Limit of Real Function/Examples/Reciprocal of x at Infinity" ]
proofwiki-16157
Empty Set is Subset of Power Set
The empty set is a subset of all power sets: :$\forall S: \O \subseteq \powerset S$
Follows directly from Empty Set is Subset of All Sets. {{qed}}
The [[Definition:Empty Set|empty set]] is a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of all [[Definition:Power Set|power sets]]: :$\forall S: \O \subseteq \powerset S$
Follows directly from [[Empty Set is Subset of All Sets]]. {{qed}}
Empty Set is Subset of Power Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Empty_Set_is_Subset_of_Power_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Empty_Set_is_Subset_of_Power_Set
[ "Empty Set", "Power Set", "Subsets" ]
[ "Definition:Empty Set", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Power Set" ]
[ "Empty Set is Subset of All Sets" ]
proofwiki-16158
Equivalence of Definitions of Weakly Locally Connected at Point/Definition 1 implies Definition 2
Let $x$ have a neighborhood basis consisting of connected sets.
Let $U$ be an open neighborhood of $x$. By assumption there exists a connected neighborhood $C$ of $x$ such that $C \subseteq U$. By definition of a neighborhood, there exists an open neighborhood $V$ of $x$ such that $V \subseteq C$. From Subset Relation is Transitive, $V \subseteq U$. By definition of a subset: :$\fo...
Let $x$ have a [[Definition:Neighborhood Basis|neighborhood basis]] consisting of [[Definition:Connected Set (Topology)|connected sets]].
Let $U$ be an [[Definition:Open Neighborhood of Point|open neighborhood]] of $x$. By assumption there exists a [[Definition:Connected Set (Topology)|connected]] [[Definition:Neighborhood of Point|neighborhood]] $C$ of $x$ such that $C \subseteq U$. By definition of a [[Definition:Neighborhood of Point|neighborhood]],...
Equivalence of Definitions of Weakly Locally Connected at Point/Definition 1 implies Definition 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Weakly_Locally_Connected_at_Point/Definition_1_implies_Definition_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Weakly_Locally_Connected_at_Point/Definition_1_implies_Definition_2
[ "Equivalence of Definitions of Weakly Locally Connected at Point" ]
[ "Definition:Neighborhood Basis", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)" ]
[ "Definition:Open Neighborhood/Point", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)", "Definition:Neighborhood (Topology)/Point", "Definition:Neighborhood (Topology)/Point", "Definition:Open Neighborhood/Point", "Subset Relation is Transitive", "Definition:Subset" ]
proofwiki-16159
Equivalence of Definitions of Weakly Locally Connected at Point/Definition 2 implies Definition 1
Let every open neighborhood $U$ of $x$ contain an open neighborhood $V$ of $x$ such that every two points of $V$ lie in some connected subset of $U$.
Let $\BB = \set {B \subseteq S: B \text{ is a connected neighborhood of } x}$ It will be shown that $\BB$ is a neighborhood basis consisting of connected sets. Let $N$ be any neighborhood of $x$. By definition of a neighborhood there exists an open neighborhood $U$ of $x$ such that $U \subseteq N$ By assumption there e...
Let every [[Definition:Open Neighborhood of Point|open neighborhood]] $U$ of $x$ contain an [[Definition:Open Neighborhood of Point|open neighborhood]] $V$ of $x$ such that every two points of $V$ lie in some [[Definition:Connected Set (Topology)|connected subset]] of $U$.
Let $\BB = \set {B \subseteq S: B \text{ is a connected neighborhood of } x}$ It will be shown that $\BB$ is a [[Definition:Neighborhood Basis|neighborhood basis]] consisting of [[Definition:Connected Set (Topology)|connected sets]]. Let $N$ be any [[Definition:Neighborhood of Point|neighborhood]] of $x$. By defini...
Equivalence of Definitions of Weakly Locally Connected at Point/Definition 2 implies Definition 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Weakly_Locally_Connected_at_Point/Definition_2_implies_Definition_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Weakly_Locally_Connected_at_Point/Definition_2_implies_Definition_1
[ "Equivalence of Definitions of Weakly Locally Connected at Point" ]
[ "Definition:Open Neighborhood/Point", "Definition:Open Neighborhood/Point", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)" ]
[ "Definition:Neighborhood Basis", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)", "Definition:Neighborhood (Topology)/Point", "Definition:Neighborhood (Topology)/Point", "Definition:Open Neighborhood/Point", "Definition:Open Neighborhood/Point", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)", "Definition:Connected Set (...
proofwiki-16160
Cycle of Subsets implies Set Equality
Let $A_1, A_2, \dotsc, A_n$ be sets. Let: :$\forall k \in \set {2, 3, \dotsc, n}: A_{k - 1} \subseteq A_k$ and: :$A_n \subseteq A_1$ Then: :$\forall j, k \in \set {1, 2, \dotsc, n}: A_j = A_k$
Consider the set of sets $\mathbb A = \set {A_1, A_2, \dotsc, A_n}$ Consider the relational structure $S = \struct {\mathbb A, \subseteq}$. We have from Subset Relation is Ordering that $S$ is an ordered structure. The result follows from Ordering Cycle implies Equality. {{qed}}
Let $A_1, A_2, \dotsc, A_n$ be [[Definition:Set|sets]]. Let: :$\forall k \in \set {2, 3, \dotsc, n}: A_{k - 1} \subseteq A_k$ and: :$A_n \subseteq A_1$ Then: :$\forall j, k \in \set {1, 2, \dotsc, n}: A_j = A_k$
Consider the [[Definition:Set of Sets|set of sets]] $\mathbb A = \set {A_1, A_2, \dotsc, A_n}$ Consider the [[Definition:Relational Structure|relational structure]] $S = \struct {\mathbb A, \subseteq}$. We have from [[Subset Relation is Ordering]] that $S$ is an [[Definition:Ordered Structure|ordered structure]]. T...
Cycle of Subsets implies Set Equality
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cycle_of_Subsets_implies_Set_Equality
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cycle_of_Subsets_implies_Set_Equality
[ "Subsets" ]
[ "Definition:Set" ]
[ "Definition:Set of Sets", "Definition:Relational Structure", "Subset Relation is Ordering", "Definition:Ordered Structure", "Ordering Cycle implies Equality/General Case" ]
proofwiki-16161
Integral Representation of Dirichlet Beta Function in terms of Gamma Function
:$\ds \map \beta s = \frac 1 {\map \Gamma s} \int_0^\infty \frac {x^{s - 1} e^{-x} } {1 + e^{-2 x} } \rd x$
We have, by Laplace Transform of Power: :$\ds \frac {\paren {-1}^n \map \Gamma s} {\paren {2 n + 1}^s} = \paren {-1}^n \int_0^\infty x^{s - 1} e^{-\paren {2 n + 1} x} \rd x$ for $\map \Re s > 0$. Summing, we have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \Gamma s \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^N \frac {\paren {-1}^n} {\paren {2 n + 1}^...
:$\ds \map \beta s = \frac 1 {\map \Gamma s} \int_0^\infty \frac {x^{s - 1} e^{-x} } {1 + e^{-2 x} } \rd x$
We have, by [[Laplace Transform of Power]]: :$\ds \frac {\paren {-1}^n \map \Gamma s} {\paren {2 n + 1}^s} = \paren {-1}^n \int_0^\infty x^{s - 1} e^{-\paren {2 n + 1} x} \rd x$ for $\map \Re s > 0$. Summing, we have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \Gamma s \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^N \frac {\paren {-1}^n} {\paren {...
Integral Representation of Dirichlet Beta Function in terms of Gamma Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integral_Representation_of_Dirichlet_Beta_Function_in_terms_of_Gamma_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integral_Representation_of_Dirichlet_Beta_Function_in_terms_of_Gamma_Function
[ "Dirichlet Beta Function", "Gamma Function" ]
[]
[ "Laplace Transform of Power", "Linear Combination of Integrals/Definite", "Combination Theorem for Limits of Functions/Complex/Multiple Rule", "Lebesgue's Dominated Convergence Theorem", "Sum of Infinite Geometric Sequence", "Category:Dirichlet Beta Function", "Category:Gamma Function" ]
proofwiki-16162
Dirichlet Beta Function at Odd Positive Integers
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \beta {2 n + 1} | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {\paren {-1}^k} {\paren {2 k + 1}^{2 n + 1} } | c = }} {{eqn | r = \frac 1 {1^{2 n + 1} } - \frac 1 {3^{2 n + 1} } + \frac 1 {5^{2 n + 1} } - \frac 1 {7^{2 n + 1} } + \cdots | c = }} {{eqn | r = \paren {-1}^n \dfra...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \beta {2 n + 1} | r = \dfrac 1 {4^{2 n + 1} } \paren {\map \zeta {2 n + 1, \frac 1 4} - \map \zeta {2 n + 1, \frac 3 4} } | c = Dirichlet Beta Function in terms of Hurwitz Zeta Function }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac 1 {4^{2 n + 1} } \paren { \dfrac {\map {\psi_{2 n} } {\dfrac 1 4} - \...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \beta {2 n + 1} | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {\paren {-1}^k} {\paren {2 k + 1}^{2 n + 1} } | c = }} {{eqn | r = \frac 1 {1^{2 n + 1} } - \frac 1 {3^{2 n + 1} } + \frac 1 {5^{2 n + 1} } - \frac 1 {7^{2 n + 1} } + \cdots | c = }} {{eqn | r = \paren {-1}^n \dfra...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \beta {2 n + 1} | r = \dfrac 1 {4^{2 n + 1} } \paren {\map \zeta {2 n + 1, \frac 1 4} - \map \zeta {2 n + 1, \frac 3 4} } | c = [[Dirichlet Beta Function in terms of Hurwitz Zeta Function]] }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac 1 {4^{2 n + 1} } \paren { \dfrac {\map {\psi_{2 n} } {\dfrac 1 4}...
Dirichlet Beta Function at Odd Positive Integers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Dirichlet_Beta_Function_at_Odd_Positive_Integers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Dirichlet_Beta_Function_at_Odd_Positive_Integers
[ "Dirichlet Beta Function at Odd Positive Integers", "Dirichlet Beta Function", "Euler Numbers", "Sums of Sequences" ]
[ "Definition:Dirichlet Beta Function", "Definition:Euler Numbers", "Definition:Positive/Integer" ]
[ "Dirichlet Beta Function in terms of Hurwitz Zeta Function", "Polygamma Function in terms of Hurwitz Zeta Function", "Polygamma Reflection Formula", "Even Derivatives of Cotangent of Pi Z at One Fourth" ]
proofwiki-16163
Correspondence between Set and Ordinate of Cartesian Product is Mapping
Let $S$ and $T$ be sets such that $T \ne \O$. Let $S \times T$ denote their cartesian product. Let $t \in T$ be given. Let $j_t \subseteq S \times \paren {S \times T}$ be the relation on $S \times {S \times T}$ defined as: :$\forall s \in S: \map {j_t} s = \tuple {s, t}$ Then $j_t$ is a mapping.
First it is to be shown that $j_t$ is left-total. This follows from the fact that $j_t$ is defined for all $s$: :$\map {j_t} s = \tuple {s, t}$ {{qed|lemma}} Next it is to be shown that $j_t$ is many-to-one, that is: :$\forall s_1, s_2 \in S: \map {j_t} {s_1} \ne \map {j_t} {s_2} \implies s_1 \ne s_2$ We have that: {{b...
Let $S$ and $T$ be [[Definition:Set|sets]] such that $T \ne \O$. Let $S \times T$ denote their [[Definition:Cartesian Product|cartesian product]]. Let $t \in T$ be given. Let $j_t \subseteq S \times \paren {S \times T}$ be the [[Definition:Relation|relation]] on $S \times {S \times T}$ defined as: :$\forall s \in ...
First it is to be shown that $j_t$ is [[Definition:Left-Total Relation|left-total]]. This follows from the fact that $j_t$ is defined for all $s$: :$\map {j_t} s = \tuple {s, t}$ {{qed|lemma}} Next it is to be shown that $j_t$ is [[Definition:Many-to-One Relation|many-to-one]], that is: :$\forall s_1, s_2 \in S: \ma...
Correspondence between Set and Ordinate of Cartesian Product is Mapping
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Correspondence_between_Set_and_Ordinate_of_Cartesian_Product_is_Mapping
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Correspondence_between_Set_and_Ordinate_of_Cartesian_Product_is_Mapping
[ "Cartesian Product" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Cartesian Product", "Definition:Relation", "Definition:Mapping" ]
[ "Definition:Left-Total Relation", "Definition:Many-to-One Relation" ]
proofwiki-16164
Mapping from Set to Ordinate of Cartesian Product is Injection
Let $S$ and $T$ be sets such that $T \ne \O$. Let $S \times T$ denote their cartesian product. Let $t \in T$ be given. Let $j_t: S \to S \times T$ be the mapping from $S$ to $S \times T$ defined as: :$\forall s \in S: \map {j_t} s = \tuple {s, t}$ Then $j_t$ is an injection.
It has been shown in Correspondence between Set and Ordinate of Cartesian Product is Mapping that $j_t$ is a mapping. Now it is to be shown that $j_t$ is injective, that is: :$\forall s_1, s_2 \in S: \map {j_t} {s_1} = \map {j_t} {s_2} \implies s_1 = s_2$ We have that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {j_t} {s_1} |...
Let $S$ and $T$ be [[Definition:Set|sets]] such that $T \ne \O$. Let $S \times T$ denote their [[Definition:Cartesian Product|cartesian product]]. Let $t \in T$ be given. Let $j_t: S \to S \times T$ be the [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]] from $S$ to $S \times T$ defined as: :$\forall s \in S: \map {j_t} s = \tuple ...
It has been shown in [[Correspondence between Set and Ordinate of Cartesian Product is Mapping]] that $j_t$ is a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]. Now it is to be shown that $j_t$ is [[Definition:Injection|injective]], that is: :$\forall s_1, s_2 \in S: \map {j_t} {s_1} = \map {j_t} {s_2} \implies s_1 = s_2$ We have t...
Mapping from Set to Ordinate of Cartesian Product is Injection
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Mapping_from_Set_to_Ordinate_of_Cartesian_Product_is_Injection
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Mapping_from_Set_to_Ordinate_of_Cartesian_Product_is_Injection
[ "Cartesian Product", "Injections" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Cartesian Product", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Injection" ]
[ "Correspondence between Set and Ordinate of Cartesian Product is Mapping", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Injection" ]
proofwiki-16165
Primitive of Sine Integral Function
:$\ds \int \map \Si x \rd x = x \map \Si x + \cos x + C$
By Derivative of Sine Integral Function, we have: :$\map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\map \Si x} = \dfrac {\sin x} x$ So: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int \map \Si x \rd x | r = \int 1 \times \map \Si x \rd x }} {{eqn | r = x \map \Si x - \int x \frac {\sin x} x \rd x | c = Integration by Parts }} {{eqn | r = x \map \Si x -...
:$\ds \int \map \Si x \rd x = x \map \Si x + \cos x + C$
By [[Derivative of Sine Integral Function]], we have: :$\map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\map \Si x} = \dfrac {\sin x} x$ So: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int \map \Si x \rd x | r = \int 1 \times \map \Si x \rd x }} {{eqn | r = x \map \Si x - \int x \frac {\sin x} x \rd x | c = [[Integration by Parts]] }} {{eqn | r = x \...
Primitive of Sine Integral Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Sine_Integral_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Sine_Integral_Function
[ "Primitives", "Sine Integral Function" ]
[]
[ "Derivative of Sine Integral Function", "Integration by Parts", "Primitive of Sine Function", "Category:Primitives", "Category:Sine Integral Function" ]
proofwiki-16166
Preimage of Subset of Cartesian Product under Injection from Factor
Let $S$ and $T$ be sets such that $T \ne \O$. Let $S \times T$ denote their cartesian product. Let $t \in T$ be given. Let $j_t: S \to S \times T$ be the injection from $S$ to $S \times T$ defined as: :$\forall s \in S: \map {j_t} s = \tuple {s, t}$ Let $W \subseteq S \times T$. Let $V = {j_t}^{-1} \sqbrk W$ denote the...
That $j_t$ is actually an injection is demonstrated in Mapping from Set to Ordinate of Cartesian Product is Injection. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = V | r = {j_t}^{-1} \sqbrk W | c = }} {{eqn | r = \set {s \in S : \map {j_t} s \in W} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \set {s \in S : \tuple {s, t} \in W} ...
Let $S$ and $T$ be [[Definition:Set|sets]] such that $T \ne \O$. Let $S \times T$ denote their [[Definition:Cartesian Product|cartesian product]]. Let $t \in T$ be given. Let $j_t: S \to S \times T$ be the [[Definition:Injection|injection]] from $S$ to $S \times T$ defined as: :$\forall s \in S: \map {j_t} s = \tu...
That $j_t$ is actually an [[Definition:Injection|injection]] is demonstrated in [[Mapping from Set to Ordinate of Cartesian Product is Injection]]. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = V | r = {j_t}^{-1} \sqbrk W | c = }} {{eqn | r = \set {s \in S : \map {j_t} s \in W} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \set {s \in ...
Preimage of Subset of Cartesian Product under Injection from Factor
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Preimage_of_Subset_of_Cartesian_Product_under_Injection_from_Factor
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Preimage_of_Subset_of_Cartesian_Product_under_Injection_from_Factor
[ "Cartesian Product", "Injections" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Cartesian Product", "Definition:Injection", "Definition:Preimage/Mapping/Subset" ]
[ "Definition:Injection", "Mapping from Set to Ordinate of Cartesian Product is Injection" ]
proofwiki-16167
Primitive of Gauss Error Function
:$\ds \int \map \erf x \rd x = x \map \erf x + \frac 1 {\sqrt \pi} e^{-x^2} + C$
By Derivative of Gauss Error Function, we have: :$\dfrac \d {\d x} \paren {\map \erf x} = \dfrac 2 {\sqrt \pi} e^{-x^2}$ So: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int \map \erf x \rd x | r = \int 1 \times \map \erf x \rd x }} {{eqn | r = x \map \erf x - \frac 2 {\sqrt \pi} \int x e^{-x^2} \rd x | c = Integration by Pa...
:$\ds \int \map \erf x \rd x = x \map \erf x + \frac 1 {\sqrt \pi} e^{-x^2} + C$
By [[Derivative of Gauss Error Function]], we have: :$\dfrac \d {\d x} \paren {\map \erf x} = \dfrac 2 {\sqrt \pi} e^{-x^2}$ So: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int \map \erf x \rd x | r = \int 1 \times \map \erf x \rd x }} {{eqn | r = x \map \erf x - \frac 2 {\sqrt \pi} \int x e^{-x^2} \rd x | c = [[Integrat...
Primitive of Gauss Error Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Gauss_Error_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Gauss_Error_Function
[ "Gauss Error Function", "Primitives" ]
[]
[ "Derivative of Gauss Error Function", "Integration by Parts", "Integration by Substitution", "Primitive of Exponential Function", "Category:Gauss Error Function", "Category:Primitives" ]
proofwiki-16168
Derivative of Gauss Error Function
:$\map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\map \erf x} = \dfrac 2 {\sqrt \pi} e^{-x^2}$
We have, by the definition of the Gauss error function: :$\ds \map \erf x = \frac 2 {\sqrt \pi} \int_0^x e^{-t^2} \rd t$ By Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (First Part): Corollary, we therefore have: :$\map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\map \erf x} = \dfrac 2 {\sqrt \pi} e^{-x^2}$ {{qed}} Category:Gauss Error Function Category...
:$\map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\map \erf x} = \dfrac 2 {\sqrt \pi} e^{-x^2}$
We have, by the definition of the [[Definition:Gauss Error Function|Gauss error function]]: :$\ds \map \erf x = \frac 2 {\sqrt \pi} \int_0^x e^{-t^2} \rd t$ By [[Fundamental Theorem of Calculus/First Part/Corollary|Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (First Part): Corollary]], we therefore have: :$\map {\dfrac \d {\d x}...
Derivative of Gauss Error Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Gauss_Error_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Gauss_Error_Function
[ "Gauss Error Function", "Derivatives" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Gauss Error Function", "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus/First Part/Corollary", "Category:Gauss Error Function", "Category:Derivatives" ]
proofwiki-16169
Limit to Infinity of Gauss Error Function
:$\ds \lim_{x \mathop \to \infty} \map \erf x = 1$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \lim_{x \mathop \to \infty} \map \erf x | r = \lim_{x \mathop \to \infty} \paren {\frac 2 {\sqrt \pi} \int_0^x e^{-t^2} \rd t} | c = {{Defof|Gauss Error Function}} }} {{eqn | r = \frac 2 {\sqrt \pi} \int_0^\infty e^{-t^2} \rd t | c = Multiple Rule for Limits of Real Functions...
:$\ds \lim_{x \mathop \to \infty} \map \erf x = 1$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \lim_{x \mathop \to \infty} \map \erf x | r = \lim_{x \mathop \to \infty} \paren {\frac 2 {\sqrt \pi} \int_0^x e^{-t^2} \rd t} | c = {{Defof|Gauss Error Function}} }} {{eqn | r = \frac 2 {\sqrt \pi} \int_0^\infty e^{-t^2} \rd t | c = [[Multiple Rule for Limits of Real Functio...
Limit to Infinity of Gauss Error Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Limit_to_Infinity_of_Gauss_Error_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Limit_to_Infinity_of_Gauss_Error_Function
[ "Gauss Error Function", "Examples of Limits of Real Functions" ]
[]
[ "Combination Theorem for Limits of Functions/Real/Multiple Rule", "Integral to Infinity of Exponential of -t^2" ]
proofwiki-16170
Dirichlet Beta Function in terms of Hurwitz Zeta Function
:$\map \beta s = \dfrac 1 {4^s} \paren {\map \zeta {s, \dfrac 1 4} - \map \zeta {s, \dfrac 3 4} }$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \beta s | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {\paren {-1}^n} {\paren {2 n + 1}^s} | c = {{Defof|Dirichlet Beta Function}} }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac 1 {\paren {4 n + 1}^s} - \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac 1 {\paren {4 n + 3}^s} | c = splitting...
:$\map \beta s = \dfrac 1 {4^s} \paren {\map \zeta {s, \dfrac 1 4} - \map \zeta {s, \dfrac 3 4} }$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \beta s | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {\paren {-1}^n} {\paren {2 n + 1}^s} | c = {{Defof|Dirichlet Beta Function}} }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac 1 {\paren {4 n + 1}^s} - \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac 1 {\paren {4 n + 3}^s} | c = splitting...
Dirichlet Beta Function in terms of Hurwitz Zeta Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Dirichlet_Beta_Function_in_terms_of_Hurwitz_Zeta_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Dirichlet_Beta_Function_in_terms_of_Hurwitz_Zeta_Function
[ "Dirichlet Beta Function", "Hurwitz Zeta Function" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Summation", "Definition:Positive/Real Number", "Definition:Negative/Real Number", "Definition:Hurwitz Zeta Function", "Category:Dirichlet Beta Function", "Category:Hurwitz Zeta Function" ]
proofwiki-16171
Inverse of Right-Total Relation is Left-Total
:$\RR$ is right-total {{iff}} $\RR^{-1}$ is left-total.
=== Sufficient Condition === Let $\RR$ be right-total. Then by definition: :$\forall t \in T: \exists s \in S: \tuple {s, t} \in \RR$ By definition of the inverse of $\RR$, it follows that: :$\forall t \in T: \exists s \in S: \tuple {t, s} \in \RR^{-1}$ So by definition $\RR^{-1}$ is left-total. {{qed|lemma}}
:$\RR$ is [[Definition:Right-Total Relation|right-total]] {{iff}} $\RR^{-1}$ is [[Definition:Left-Total Relation|left-total]].
=== Sufficient Condition === Let $\RR$ be [[Definition:Right-Total Relation|right-total]]. Then by definition: :$\forall t \in T: \exists s \in S: \tuple {s, t} \in \RR$ By definition of the [[Definition:Inverse Relation|inverse]] of $\RR$, it follows that: :$\forall t \in T: \exists s \in S: \tuple {t, s} \in \RR^{...
Inverse of Right-Total Relation is Left-Total
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inverse_of_Right-Total_Relation_is_Left-Total
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inverse_of_Right-Total_Relation_is_Left-Total
[ "Inverse Relations", "Right-Total Relations", "Left-Total Relations" ]
[ "Definition:Right-Total Relation", "Definition:Left-Total Relation" ]
[ "Definition:Right-Total Relation", "Definition:Inverse Relation", "Definition:Left-Total Relation", "Definition:Left-Total Relation", "Definition:Right-Total Relation" ]
proofwiki-16172
Inverse of Left-Total Relation is Right-Total
:$\RR$ is left-total {{iff}} $\RR^{-1}$ is right-total.
From Inverse of Inverse Relation, the inverse of $\RR^{-1}$ is $\RR$. From Inverse of Right-Total Relation is Left-Total: :$\RR^{-1}$ is right-total {{iff}} $\RR$ is left-total. Hence the result. {{qed}} Category:Inverse Relations Category:Left-Total Relations Category:Right-Total Relations p7et19gof1t0i11wuqbu8ugwwstx...
:$\RR$ is [[Definition:Left-Total Relation|left-total]] {{iff}} $\RR^{-1}$ is [[Definition:Right-Total Relation|right-total]].
From [[Inverse of Inverse Relation]], the [[Definition:Inverse Relation|inverse]] of $\RR^{-1}$ is $\RR$. From [[Inverse of Right-Total Relation is Left-Total]]: :$\RR^{-1}$ is [[Definition:Right-Total Relation|right-total]] {{iff}} $\RR$ is [[Definition:Left-Total Relation|left-total]]. Hence the result. {{qed}} [[...
Inverse of Left-Total Relation is Right-Total
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inverse_of_Left-Total_Relation_is_Right-Total
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inverse_of_Left-Total_Relation_is_Right-Total
[ "Inverse Relations", "Left-Total Relations", "Right-Total Relations" ]
[ "Definition:Left-Total Relation", "Definition:Right-Total Relation" ]
[ "Inverse of Inverse Relation", "Definition:Inverse Relation", "Inverse of Right-Total Relation is Left-Total", "Definition:Right-Total Relation", "Definition:Left-Total Relation", "Category:Inverse Relations", "Category:Left-Total Relations", "Category:Right-Total Relations" ]
proofwiki-16173
Inverse of Mapping is Right-Total Relation
Let $f$ be a mapping. Then its inverse $f^{-1}$ is a right-total relation.
We have that $f$ is a mapping. Hence $f$ is {{afortiori}} a left-total relation. Then from Inverse of Left-Total Relation is Right-Total, $f^{-1}$ is right-total. {{Qed}} Category:Inverse Relations Category:Inverse Mappings Category:Right-Total Relations rbbo0ijqmjzkhouyjoifa8s3qq0i868
Let $f$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]. Then its [[Definition:Inverse of Mapping|inverse]] $f^{-1}$ is a [[Definition:Right-Total Relation|right-total relation]].
We have that $f$ is a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]. Hence $f$ is {{afortiori}} a [[Definition:Left-Total Relation|left-total relation]]. Then from [[Inverse of Left-Total Relation is Right-Total]], $f^{-1}$ is [[Definition:Right-Total Relation|right-total]]. {{Qed}} [[Category:Inverse Relations]] [[Category:Invers...
Inverse of Mapping is Right-Total Relation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inverse_of_Mapping_is_Right-Total_Relation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inverse_of_Mapping_is_Right-Total_Relation
[ "Inverse Relations", "Inverse Mappings", "Right-Total Relations" ]
[ "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Inverse of Mapping", "Definition:Right-Total Relation" ]
[ "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Left-Total Relation", "Inverse of Left-Total Relation is Right-Total", "Definition:Right-Total Relation", "Category:Inverse Relations", "Category:Inverse Mappings", "Category:Right-Total Relations" ]
proofwiki-16174
Inverse of One-to-One Relation is One-to-One
The inverse of a one-to-one relation is a one-to-one relation.
Let $\RR$ be a one-to-one relation. Let $\RR^{-1}$ denote its inverse By definition, $\RR$ is a relation which is both many-to-one and one-to-many. From Inverse of Many-to-One Relation is One-to-Many: :$\RR^{-1}$ is both one-to-many and many-to-one. Hence the result by definition of one-to-one relation. {{qed}} Categor...
The [[Definition:Inverse Relation|inverse]] of a [[Definition:One-to-One Relation|one-to-one relation]] is a [[Definition:One-to-One Relation|one-to-one relation]].
Let $\RR$ be a [[Definition:One-to-One Relation|one-to-one relation]]. Let $\RR^{-1}$ denote its [[Definition:Inverse Relation|inverse]] By definition, $\RR$ is a [[Definition:Relation|relation]] which is both [[Definition:Many-to-One Relation|many-to-one]] and [[Definition:One-to-Many Relation|one-to-many]]. From ...
Inverse of One-to-One Relation is One-to-One
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inverse_of_One-to-One_Relation_is_One-to-One
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inverse_of_One-to-One_Relation_is_One-to-One
[ "Inverse Relations" ]
[ "Definition:Inverse Relation", "Definition:One-to-One Relation", "Definition:One-to-One Relation" ]
[ "Definition:One-to-One Relation", "Definition:Inverse Relation", "Definition:Relation", "Definition:Many-to-One Relation", "Definition:One-to-Many Relation", "Inverse of Many-to-One Relation is One-to-Many", "Definition:One-to-Many Relation", "Definition:Many-to-One Relation", "Definition:One-to-One...
proofwiki-16175
Inverse of Injection is One-to-One Relation
Let $f$ be an injective mapping. Then its inverse $f^{-1}$ is a one-to-one relation.
We are given that $f$ is an injective mapping. Hence by definition $f$ is a one-to-one relation. The result follows from from Inverse of One-to-One Relation is One-to-One. {{Qed}}
Let $f$ be an [[Definition:Injection|injective mapping]]. Then its [[Definition:Inverse of Mapping|inverse]] $f^{-1}$ is a [[Definition:One-to-One Relation|one-to-one relation]].
We are given that $f$ is an [[Definition:Injection|injective mapping]]. Hence by definition $f$ is a [[Definition:One-to-One Relation|one-to-one relation]]. The result follows from from [[Inverse of One-to-One Relation is One-to-One]]. {{Qed}}
Inverse of Injection is One-to-One Relation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inverse_of_Injection_is_One-to-One_Relation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inverse_of_Injection_is_One-to-One_Relation
[ "Inverse Relations", "Injections", "Inverse Mappings" ]
[ "Definition:Injection", "Definition:Inverse of Mapping", "Definition:One-to-One Relation" ]
[ "Definition:Injection", "Definition:One-to-One Relation", "Inverse of One-to-One Relation is One-to-One" ]
proofwiki-16176
Inverse of Surjection is Relation both Left-Total and Right-Total
Let $f$ be an surjective mapping. Then its inverse $f^{-1}$ is a relation which is both left-total and right-total.
We are given that $f$ is a surjective mapping. By Inverse of Mapping is Right-Total Relation, $f^{-1}$ is a right-total relation. By definition of surjection, $f$ is itself a right-total relation. From Inverse of Right-Total Relation is Left-Total, $f^{-1}$ is a left-total relation. Hence the result. {{Qed}} Category:I...
Let $f$ be an [[Definition:Surjection|surjective mapping]]. Then its [[Definition:Inverse of Mapping|inverse]] $f^{-1}$ is a [[Definition:Relation|relation]] which is both [[Definition:Left-Total Relation|left-total]] and [[Definition:Right-Total Relation|right-total]].
We are given that $f$ is a [[Definition:Surjection|surjective mapping]]. By [[Inverse of Mapping is Right-Total Relation]], $f^{-1}$ is a [[Definition:Right-Total Relation|right-total relation]]. By definition of [[Definition:Surjection|surjection]], $f$ is itself a [[Definition:Right-Total Relation|right-total relat...
Inverse of Surjection is Relation both Left-Total and Right-Total
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inverse_of_Surjection_is_Relation_both_Left-Total_and_Right-Total
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inverse_of_Surjection_is_Relation_both_Left-Total_and_Right-Total
[ "Inverse Relations", "Surjections", "Inverse Mappings", "Right-Total Relations", "Left-Total Relations" ]
[ "Definition:Surjection", "Definition:Inverse of Mapping", "Definition:Relation", "Definition:Left-Total Relation", "Definition:Right-Total Relation" ]
[ "Definition:Surjection", "Inverse of Mapping is Right-Total Relation", "Definition:Right-Total Relation", "Definition:Surjection", "Definition:Right-Total Relation", "Inverse of Right-Total Relation is Left-Total", "Definition:Left-Total Relation", "Category:Inverse Relations", "Category:Surjections...
proofwiki-16177
Inverse is Mapping implies Mapping is Injection
Let $S$ and $T$ be sets. Let $f: S \to T$ be a mapping. Let the inverse $f^{-1} \subseteq T \times S$ itself be a mapping. Then $f$ is an injection.
Let $f^{-1}: T \to S$ be a mapping. Let $\map f {x_a} = y$ and $\map f {x_b} = y$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \tuple {x_a, y} | o = \in | r = f | c = {{Defof|Mapping}} }} {{eqn | lo= \land | l = \tuple {x_b, y} | o = \in | r = f | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \...
Let $S$ and $T$ be [[Definition:Set|sets]]. Let $f: S \to T$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]. Let the [[Definition:Inverse of Mapping|inverse]] $f^{-1} \subseteq T \times S$ itself be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]. Then $f$ is an [[Definition:Injection|injection]].
Let $f^{-1}: T \to S$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]. Let $\map f {x_a} = y$ and $\map f {x_b} = y$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \tuple {x_a, y} | o = \in | r = f | c = {{Defof|Mapping}} }} {{eqn | lo= \land | l = \tuple {x_b, y} | o = \in | r = f | c = }} {{eqn | ...
Inverse is Mapping implies Mapping is Injection/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inverse_is_Mapping_implies_Mapping_is_Injection
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inverse_is_Mapping_implies_Mapping_is_Injection/Proof_1
[ "Mapping is Injection and Surjection iff Inverse is Mapping" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Inverse of Mapping", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Injection" ]
[ "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Many-to-One Relation", "Definition:Injection" ]
proofwiki-16178
Inverse is Mapping implies Mapping is Injection
Let $S$ and $T$ be sets. Let $f: S \to T$ be a mapping. Let the inverse $f^{-1} \subseteq T \times S$ itself be a mapping. Then $f$ is an injection.
Let $f^{-1}: T \to S$ be a mapping. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map f x | r = \map f y | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \map {f^{-1} } {\map f x} | r = \map {f^{-1} } {\map f y} | c = as $f^{-1}$ is a mapping }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = x | r = y | c = {{Defof|Invers...
Let $S$ and $T$ be [[Definition:Set|sets]]. Let $f: S \to T$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]. Let the [[Definition:Inverse of Mapping|inverse]] $f^{-1} \subseteq T \times S$ itself be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]. Then $f$ is an [[Definition:Injection|injection]].
Let $f^{-1}: T \to S$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map f x | r = \map f y | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \map {f^{-1} } {\map f x} | r = \map {f^{-1} } {\map f y} | c = as $f^{-1}$ is a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]] }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto |...
Inverse is Mapping implies Mapping is Injection/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inverse_is_Mapping_implies_Mapping_is_Injection
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inverse_is_Mapping_implies_Mapping_is_Injection/Proof_2
[ "Mapping is Injection and Surjection iff Inverse is Mapping" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Inverse of Mapping", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Injection" ]
[ "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Injection" ]
proofwiki-16179
Inverse is Mapping implies Mapping is Surjection
Let $S$ and $T$ be sets. Let $f: S \to T$ be a mapping. Let the inverse $f^{-1} \subseteq T \times S$ itself be a mapping. Then $f$ is a surjection.
Let $f^{-1}: T \to S$ be a mapping. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = t | o = \in | r = T | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \map {f^{-1} } t | o = \in | r = S | c = as $f^{-1}$ is a mapping }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \map f {\map {f^{-1} } t} | r = t | ...
Let $S$ and $T$ be [[Definition:Set|sets]]. Let $f: S \to T$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]. Let the [[Definition:Inverse of Mapping|inverse]] $f^{-1} \subseteq T \times S$ itself be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]. Then $f$ is a [[Definition:Surjection|surjection]].
Let $f^{-1}: T \to S$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = t | o = \in | r = T | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \map {f^{-1} } t | o = \in | r = S | c = as $f^{-1}$ is a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]] }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l =...
Inverse is Mapping implies Mapping is Surjection/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inverse_is_Mapping_implies_Mapping_is_Surjection
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inverse_is_Mapping_implies_Mapping_is_Surjection/Proof_2
[ "Mapping is Injection and Surjection iff Inverse is Mapping" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Inverse of Mapping", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Surjection" ]
[ "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Surjection" ]
proofwiki-16180
Derivative Function is not Invertible
Let $\Bbb I = \closedint a b$ be a closed interval on the set of real numbers $\R$ such that $a < b$. Let $A$ denote the set of all continuous real functions $f: \Bbb I \to \R$. Let $B \subseteq A$ denote the set of all functions differentiable on $\Bbb I$ whose derivative is continuous on $\Bbb I$. Let $d: B \to A$ de...
By definition, $d$ is invertible {{iff}} $d$ is a bijection. It is sufficient to demonstrate that $d$ is not an injection. Hence a fortiori $d$ is shown to not be a bijection. Consider a differentiable function $f \in B$. Then consider the function $g \in B$ defined as: :$\forall x \in \Bbb I: \map g x = \map f x + C$ ...
Let $\Bbb I = \closedint a b$ be a [[Definition:Closed Real Interval|closed interval]] on the [[Definition:Real Number|set of real numbers]] $\R$ such that $a < b$. Let $A$ denote the [[Definition:Set|set]] of all [[Definition:Continuous Real Function|continuous real functions]] $f: \Bbb I \to \R$. Let $B \subseteq A...
By definition, $d$ is [[Definition:Invertible Mapping|invertible]] {{iff}} $d$ is a [[Definition:Bijection|bijection]]. It is sufficient to demonstrate that $d$ is not an [[Definition:Injection|injection]]. Hence [[Definition:A Fortiori|a fortiori]] $d$ is shown to not be a [[Definition:Bijection|bijection]]. Consi...
Derivative Function is not Invertible
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_Function_is_not_Invertible
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_Function_is_not_Invertible
[ "Differential Calculus" ]
[ "Definition:Real Interval/Closed", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Continuous Real Function", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Differentiable Mapping/Real Function/Interval/Closed Interval", "Definition:Derivative/Real Function/Derivative on Interval", "Definition:Continuous Real ...
[ "Definition:Inverse Mapping", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Injection", "Definition:A Fortiori", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Differentiable Mapping/Real Function/Interval/Closed Interval", "Definition:Real Function", "Definition:Constant", "Derivative of Function plus Constant", "Def...
proofwiki-16181
Equivalence of Definitions of Convergent Sequence in Metric Space
Let $M = \struct {A, d}$ be a metric space or a pseudometric space. Let $\sequence {x_k}$ be a sequence in $A$. {{TFAE|def = Convergent Sequence|context = Metric Space|contextview = Metric Spaces}}
=== Definition 1 iff Definition 2 === {{:Equivalence of Definitions of Convergent Sequence in Metric Space/Definition 1 iff Definition 2}}{{qed|lemma}}
Let $M = \struct {A, d}$ be a [[Definition:Metric Space|metric space]] or a [[Definition:Pseudometric Space|pseudometric space]]. Let $\sequence {x_k}$ be a [[Definition:Sequence|sequence in $A$]]. {{TFAE|def = Convergent Sequence|context = Metric Space|contextview = Metric Spaces}}
=== [[Equivalence of Definitions of Convergent Sequence in Metric Space/Definition 1 iff Definition 2|Definition 1 iff Definition 2]] === {{:Equivalence of Definitions of Convergent Sequence in Metric Space/Definition 1 iff Definition 2}}{{qed|lemma}}
Equivalence of Definitions of Convergent Sequence in Metric Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Convergent_Sequence_in_Metric_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Convergent_Sequence_in_Metric_Space
[ "Metric Spaces", "Convergence", "Sequences", "Convergent Sequences (Metric Space)", "Equivalence of Definitions of Convergent Sequence in Metric Space" ]
[ "Definition:Metric Space", "Definition:Pseudometric/Pseudometric Space", "Definition:Sequence" ]
[ "Equivalence of Definitions of Convergent Sequence in Metric Space/Definition 1 iff Definition 2" ]
proofwiki-16182
Equivalence of Definitions of Convergent Sequence in Metric Space/Definition 2 implies Definition 4
Let $\sequence {x_k}$ satisfy: :$\forall \epsilon > 0: \exists N \in \R_{>0}: \forall n \in \N: n > N \implies x_n \in \map {B_\epsilon} l$ where $\map {B_\epsilon} l$ is the open $\epsilon$-ball of $l$.
Let a fixed $\epsilon \in \R{>0}$ be selected. Then: :$\exists N \in \R_{>0}: \forall n \in \N: n > N \implies x_n \in \map {B_\epsilon} l$ Hence the only $x_k$ that cannot be in the open $\epsilon$-ball $\map {B_\epsilon} l$ of $l$ are those for which $n \le N$. There are finitely many of these.
Let $\sequence {x_k}$ satisfy: :$\forall \epsilon > 0: \exists N \in \R_{>0}: \forall n \in \N: n > N \implies x_n \in \map {B_\epsilon} l$ where $\map {B_\epsilon} l$ is the [[Definition:Open Ball of Metric Space|open $\epsilon$-ball]] of $l$.
Let a fixed $\epsilon \in \R{>0}$ be selected. Then: :$\exists N \in \R_{>0}: \forall n \in \N: n > N \implies x_n \in \map {B_\epsilon} l$ Hence the only $x_k$ that cannot be in the [[Definition:Open Ball of Metric Space|open $\epsilon$-ball]] $\map {B_\epsilon} l$ of $l$ are those for which $n \le N$. There are [[...
Equivalence of Definitions of Convergent Sequence in Metric Space/Definition 2 implies Definition 4
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Convergent_Sequence_in_Metric_Space/Definition_2_implies_Definition_4
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Convergent_Sequence_in_Metric_Space/Definition_2_implies_Definition_4
[ "Equivalence of Definitions of Convergent Sequence in Metric Space" ]
[ "Definition:Open Ball" ]
[ "Definition:Open Ball", "Definition:Finite Set" ]
proofwiki-16183
Equivalence of Definitions of Convergent Sequence in Metric Space/Definition 4 implies Definition 2
Let $\sequence {x_k}$ satisfy: :for every $\epsilon \in \R{>0}$, the open $\epsilon$-ball about $l$ contains all but finitely many of the $p_n$.
Let $\map {B_\epsilon} l$ be any open $\epsilon$-ball of $l$. Let $A = \set {n: x_n \notin \map {B_\epsilon} l}$. By assumption $A$ is finite. From Finite Non-Empty Subset of Totally Ordered Set has Smallest and Greatest Elements, any finite subset of $\N$ has a maximum. Let $N$ be the maximum of $A$. Then for every $n...
Let $\sequence {x_k}$ satisfy: :for every $\epsilon \in \R{>0}$, the [[Definition:Open Ball of Metric Space|open $\epsilon$-ball]] about $l$ contains all but [[Definition:Finite Set|finitely many]] of the $p_n$.
Let $\map {B_\epsilon} l$ be any [[Definition:Open Ball of Metric Space|open $\epsilon$-ball]] of $l$. Let $A = \set {n: x_n \notin \map {B_\epsilon} l}$. By assumption $A$ is [[Definition:Finite Set|finite]]. From [[Finite Non-Empty Subset of Totally Ordered Set has Smallest and Greatest Elements]], any [[Definitio...
Equivalence of Definitions of Convergent Sequence in Metric Space/Definition 4 implies Definition 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Convergent_Sequence_in_Metric_Space/Definition_4_implies_Definition_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Convergent_Sequence_in_Metric_Space/Definition_4_implies_Definition_2
[ "Equivalence of Definitions of Convergent Sequence in Metric Space" ]
[ "Definition:Open Ball", "Definition:Finite Set" ]
[ "Definition:Open Ball", "Definition:Finite Set", "Finite Non-Empty Subset of Totally Ordered Set has Smallest and Greatest Elements", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Greatest Element", "Definition:Greatest Element", "Definition:Open Ball" ]
proofwiki-16184
Definite Integral from 0 to 2 Pi of Reciprocal of a plus b Cosine x
:$\ds \int_0^{2 \pi} \frac {\d x} {a + b \cos x} = \frac {2 \pi} {\sqrt {a^2 - b^2} }$
Let $C$ be the unit open disk in the complex plane centred at $0$. The boundary of $C$, $\partial C$, can be parameterized by: :$\map z x = e^{i x}$ for $0 \le x \le 2 \pi$. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int_0^{2 \pi} \frac {\d x} {a + b \cos x} | r = \int_0^{2 \pi} \frac {\d x} {a + \frac b 2 \paren {...
:$\ds \int_0^{2 \pi} \frac {\d x} {a + b \cos x} = \frac {2 \pi} {\sqrt {a^2 - b^2} }$
Let $C$ be the [[Definition:Unit Disk|unit]] [[Definition:Open Complex Disk|open disk]] in the [[Definition:Complex Plane|complex plane]] centred at $0$. The [[Definition:Boundary|boundary]] of $C$, $\partial C$, can be [[Definition:Parameterization|parameterized]] by: :$\map z x = e^{i x}$ for $0 \le x \le 2 \pi$...
Definite Integral from 0 to 2 Pi of Reciprocal of a plus b Cosine x/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Definite_Integral_from_0_to_2_Pi_of_Reciprocal_of_a_plus_b_Cosine_x
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Definite_Integral_from_0_to_2_Pi_of_Reciprocal_of_a_plus_b_Cosine_x/Proof_1
[ "Definite Integrals involving Cosine Function", "Definite Integral from 0 to 2 Pi of Reciprocal of a plus b Cosine x" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Unit Disk", "Definition:Complex Disk/Open", "Definition:Complex Number/Complex Plane", "Definition:Boundary", "Definition:Parameterization", "Euler's Cosine Identity", "Derivative of Exponential Function", "Completing the Square", "Definition:Integration/Integrand", "Definition:Isolate...
proofwiki-16185
Definite Integral from 0 to 2 Pi of Reciprocal of a plus b Cosine x
:$\ds \int_0^{2 \pi} \frac {\d x} {a + b \cos x} = \frac {2 \pi} {\sqrt {a^2 - b^2} }$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int_0^{2 \pi} \frac {\d x} {a + b \cos x} | r = \int_0^\pi \frac {\d x} {a + b \cos x} + \int_\pi^{2 \pi} \frac {\d x} {a + b \cos x} | c = Sum of Integrals on Adjacent Intervals for Integrable Functions }} {{eqn | r = \intlimits {\frac 2 {\sqrt {a^2 - b^2} } \map \arctan {\sqrt {\frac {a -...
:$\ds \int_0^{2 \pi} \frac {\d x} {a + b \cos x} = \frac {2 \pi} {\sqrt {a^2 - b^2} }$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int_0^{2 \pi} \frac {\d x} {a + b \cos x} | r = \int_0^\pi \frac {\d x} {a + b \cos x} + \int_\pi^{2 \pi} \frac {\d x} {a + b \cos x} | c = [[Sum of Integrals on Adjacent Intervals for Integrable Functions]] }} {{eqn | r = \intlimits {\frac 2 {\sqrt {a^2 - b^2} } \map \arctan {\sqrt {\frac ...
Definite Integral from 0 to 2 Pi of Reciprocal of a plus b Cosine x/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Definite_Integral_from_0_to_2_Pi_of_Reciprocal_of_a_plus_b_Cosine_x
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Definite_Integral_from_0_to_2_Pi_of_Reciprocal_of_a_plus_b_Cosine_x/Proof_2
[ "Definite Integrals involving Cosine Function", "Definite Integral from 0 to 2 Pi of Reciprocal of a plus b Cosine x" ]
[]
[ "Sum of Integrals on Adjacent Intervals for Integrable Functions", "Primitive of Reciprocal of p plus q by Cosine of a x", "Tangent Function is Periodic on Reals", "Tangent Function Tends to Positive and Negative Infinity", "Limit to Positive and Negative Infinity of Arctangent Function" ]
proofwiki-16186
Definite Integral from 0 to 2 Pi of Reciprocal of Square of a plus b Cosine x
:$\ds \int_0^{2 \pi} \frac {\d x} {\paren {a + b \cos x}^2} = \frac {2 \pi a} {\paren {a^2 - b^2}^{3/2} }$
From Definite Integral from $0$ to $2 \pi$ of $\dfrac 1 {a + b \cos x}$, we have: :$\ds \int_0^{2 \pi} \frac {\d x} {a + b \cos x} = \frac {2 \pi} {\sqrt {a^2 - b^2} }$ We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \frac \partial {\partial a} \int_0^{2 \pi} \frac {\d x} {a + b \cos x} | r = \int_0^{2 \pi} \frac \partial {\part...
:$\ds \int_0^{2 \pi} \frac {\d x} {\paren {a + b \cos x}^2} = \frac {2 \pi a} {\paren {a^2 - b^2}^{3/2} }$
From [[Definite Integral from 0 to 2 Pi of Reciprocal of a plus b Cosine x|Definite Integral from $0$ to $2 \pi$ of $\dfrac 1 {a + b \cos x}$]], we have: :$\ds \int_0^{2 \pi} \frac {\d x} {a + b \cos x} = \frac {2 \pi} {\sqrt {a^2 - b^2} }$ We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \frac \partial {\partial a} \int_0^{2 \...
Definite Integral from 0 to 2 Pi of Reciprocal of Square of a plus b Cosine x/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Definite_Integral_from_0_to_2_Pi_of_Reciprocal_of_Square_of_a_plus_b_Cosine_x
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Definite_Integral_from_0_to_2_Pi_of_Reciprocal_of_Square_of_a_plus_b_Cosine_x/Proof_1
[ "Definite Integrals involving Cosine Function", "Definite Integral from 0 to 2 Pi of Reciprocal of Square of a plus b Cosine x" ]
[]
[ "Definite Integral from 0 to 2 Pi of Reciprocal of a plus b Cosine x", "Definite Integral of Partial Derivative", "Quotient Rule for Derivatives", "Quotient Rule for Derivatives" ]
proofwiki-16187
Derivative of Function plus Constant
Let $f$ be a real function which is differentiable on $\R$. Let $c \in \R$ be a constant. Then: :$\map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\map f x + c} = \map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\map f x}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\map f x + c} | r = \map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\map f x} + \map f x \, c | c = Sum Rule for Derivatives }} {{eqn | r = \map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\map f x} + 0 | c = Derivative of Constant }} {{eqn | r = \map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\map f x} | c = ...
Let $f$ be a [[Definition:Real Function|real function]] which is [[Definition:Differentiable on Interval|differentiable]] on $\R$. Let $c \in \R$ be a [[Definition:Constant|constant]]. Then: :$\map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\map f x + c} = \map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\map f x}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\map f x + c} | r = \map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\map f x} + \map f x \, c | c = [[Sum Rule for Derivatives]] }} {{eqn | r = \map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\map f x} + 0 | c = [[Derivative of Constant]] }} {{eqn | r = \map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\map f x} ...
Derivative of Function plus Constant
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Function_plus_Constant
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Function_plus_Constant
[ "Differential Calculus" ]
[ "Definition:Real Function", "Definition:Differentiable Mapping/Real Function/Interval", "Definition:Constant" ]
[ "Sum Rule for Derivatives", "Derivative of Constant", "Category:Differential Calculus" ]
proofwiki-16188
Map from Set of Continuous Functions on Interval to Set of their Integrals
Let $\Bbb I = \closedint a b$ be a closed interval on the set of real numbers $\R$ such that $a < b$. Let $A$ denote the set of all continuous real functions $f: \Bbb I \to \R$. Let $B \subseteq A$ denote the set of all functions differentiable on $\Bbb I$ whose derivative is continuous on $\Bbb I$. Let $C \subseteq B$...
Let $f \in A$ be an arbitrary continuous real function $f: \Bbb I \to \R$. From Continuous Real Function is Darboux Integrable, $\map {\paren {\map h f} } x$ exists and is continuous on $\Bbb I$. Let $x = a$. Then we have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\paren {\map h f} } x | r = \int_a^x \map f t \rd t |...
Let $\Bbb I = \closedint a b$ be a [[Definition:Closed Real Interval|closed interval]] on the [[Definition:Real Number|set of real numbers]] $\R$ such that $a < b$. Let $A$ denote the [[Definition:Set|set]] of all [[Definition:Continuous Real Function|continuous real functions]] $f: \Bbb I \to \R$. Let $B \subseteq A...
Let $f \in A$ be an arbitrary [[Definition:Continuous Real Function|continuous real function]] $f: \Bbb I \to \R$. From [[Continuous Real Function is Darboux Integrable]], $\map {\paren {\map h f} } x$ exists and is [[Definition:Continuous Real Function|continuous]] on $\Bbb I$. Let $x = a$. Then we have: {{begin-...
Map from Set of Continuous Functions on Interval to Set of their Integrals
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Map_from_Set_of_Continuous_Functions_on_Interval_to_Set_of_their_Integrals
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Map_from_Set_of_Continuous_Functions_on_Interval_to_Set_of_their_Integrals
[ "Integral Calculus", "Continuous Real Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Real Interval/Closed", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Continuous Real Function", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Differentiable Mapping/Real Function/Interval/Closed Interval", "Definition:Derivative/Real Function/Derivative on Interval", "Definition:Continuous Real ...
[ "Definition:Continuous Real Function", "Continuous Real Function is Darboux Integrable", "Definition:Continuous Real Function", "Definite Integral on Zero Interval", "Definition:Continuous Real Function", "Definition:Primitive", "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus", "Definition:Differentiable Mapping/Rea...
proofwiki-16189
Definite Integral from 0 to Half Pi of Reciprocal of One plus Power of Tan x
:$\ds \int_0^{\pi/2} \frac {\d x} {1 + \tan^m x} = \frac \pi 4$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int_0^{\pi/2} \frac {\d x} {1 + \tan^m x} | r = \int_0^{\pi/2} \frac {\cos^m x} {\cos^m x + \sin^m x} \rd x | c = multiplying by $\dfrac {\cos^m x} {\cos^m x}$ }} {{eqn | r = \int_0^{\pi/2} \frac {\map {\cos^m} {\frac \pi 2 - x} } {\map {\cos^m} {\frac \pi 2 - x} + \map {\sin^m} {\frac \pi...
:$\ds \int_0^{\pi/2} \frac {\d x} {1 + \tan^m x} = \frac \pi 4$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int_0^{\pi/2} \frac {\d x} {1 + \tan^m x} | r = \int_0^{\pi/2} \frac {\cos^m x} {\cos^m x + \sin^m x} \rd x | c = multiplying by $\dfrac {\cos^m x} {\cos^m x}$ }} {{eqn | r = \int_0^{\pi/2} \frac {\map {\cos^m} {\frac \pi 2 - x} } {\map {\cos^m} {\frac \pi 2 - x} + \map {\sin^m} {\frac \pi...
Definite Integral from 0 to Half Pi of Reciprocal of One plus Power of Tan x
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Definite_Integral_from_0_to_Half_Pi_of_Reciprocal_of_One_plus_Power_of_Tan_x
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Definite_Integral_from_0_to_Half_Pi_of_Reciprocal_of_One_plus_Power_of_Tan_x
[ "Definite Integrals involving Tangent Function" ]
[]
[ "Integral between Limits is Independent of Direction", "Cosine of Complement equals Sine", "Sine of Complement equals Cosine", "Primitive of Constant" ]
proofwiki-16190
Möbius Transformation is Bijection
Let $a, b, c, d \in \C$ be complex numbers. Let $f: \overline \C \to \overline \C$ be the Möbius transformation: :<nowiki>$\map f z = \begin {cases} \dfrac {a z + b} {c z + d} & : z \ne -\dfrac d c \\ \infty & : z = -\dfrac d c \\ \dfrac a c & : z = \infty \\ \infty & : z = \infty \text { and } c = 0 \end {cases}$</now...
We demonstrate that $f$ is injective {{iff}} $b c - a d \ne 0$. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map f {z_1} | r = \map f {z_2} | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = \dfrac {a z_1 + b} {c z_1 + d} | r = \dfrac {a z_2 + b} {c z_2 + d} | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = \paren...
Let $a, b, c, d \in \C$ be [[Definition:Complex Number|complex numbers]]. Let $f: \overline \C \to \overline \C$ be the [[Definition:Möbius Transformation|Möbius transformation]]: :<nowiki>$\map f z = \begin {cases} \dfrac {a z + b} {c z + d} & : z \ne -\dfrac d c \\ \infty & : z = -\dfrac d c \\ \dfrac a c & : z = \...
We demonstrate that $f$ is [[Definition:Injection|injective]] {{iff}} $b c - a d \ne 0$. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map f {z_1} | r = \map f {z_2} | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = \dfrac {a z_1 + b} {c z_1 + d} | r = \dfrac {a z_2 + b} {c z_2 + d} | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto...
Möbius Transformation is Bijection
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Möbius_Transformation_is_Bijection
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Möbius_Transformation_is_Bijection
[ "Möbius Transformation is Bijection", "Möbius Transformations", "Examples of Bijections" ]
[ "Definition:Complex Number", "Definition:Möbius Transformation", "Definition:Extended Complex Plane", "Definition:Bijection" ]
[ "Definition:Injection", "Definition:Injection", "Definition:Inverse of Mapping", "Inverse Element of Injection", "Definition:Möbius Transformation", "Definition:Inverse of Mapping", "Definition:Möbius Transformation", "Definition:Möbius Transformation", "Definition:Injection", "Injection is Biject...
proofwiki-16191
Definite Integral from 0 to 1 of Power of x by Power of Logarithm of x
:$\ds \int_0^1 x^m \paren {\ln x}^n \rd x = \frac {\paren {-1}^n \map \Gamma {n + 1} } {\paren {m + 1}^{n + 1} }$
Let: :$x = \map \exp {-\dfrac u {m + 1} }$ Then, by Derivative of Exponential Function: :$\dfrac {\d x} {\d u} = -\dfrac 1 {m + 1} \map \exp {-\dfrac u {m + 1} }$ We have by Exponential of Zero: :as $x \to 1$, $u \to 0$ We also have, by Exponential Tends to Zero and Infinity: :as $x \to 0$, $u \to \infty$ So: {{be...
:$\ds \int_0^1 x^m \paren {\ln x}^n \rd x = \frac {\paren {-1}^n \map \Gamma {n + 1} } {\paren {m + 1}^{n + 1} }$
Let: :$x = \map \exp {-\dfrac u {m + 1} }$ Then, by [[Derivative of Exponential Function]]: :$\dfrac {\d x} {\d u} = -\dfrac 1 {m + 1} \map \exp {-\dfrac u {m + 1} }$ We have by [[Exponential of Zero]]: :as $x \to 1$, $u \to 0$ We also have, by [[Exponential Tends to Zero and Infinity]]: :as $x \to 0$, $u \t...
Definite Integral from 0 to 1 of Power of x by Power of Logarithm of x/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Definite_Integral_from_0_to_1_of_Power_of_x_by_Power_of_Logarithm_of_x
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Definite_Integral_from_0_to_1_of_Power_of_x_by_Power_of_Logarithm_of_x/Proof_1
[ "Definite Integrals involving Logarithm Function", "Definite Integral from 0 to 1 of Power of x by Power of Logarithm of x" ]
[]
[ "Derivative of Exponential Function", "Exponential of Zero", "Exponential Tends to Zero and Infinity", "Integration by Substitution", "Reversal of Limits of Definite Integral", "Exponential of Sum", "Exponent Combination Laws/Power of Power" ]
proofwiki-16192
Definite Integral from 0 to 1 of Power of x by Power of Logarithm of x
:$\ds \int_0^1 x^m \paren {\ln x}^n \rd x = \frac {\paren {-1}^n \map \Gamma {n + 1} } {\paren {m + 1}^{n + 1} }$
From Primitive of Power, we have: :$\ds \int_0^1 x^m \rd x = \frac 1 {m + 1}$ We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \frac {\d^n} {\d m^n} \int_0^1 x^m \rd x | r = \int_0^1 \frac {\partial^n} {\partial m^n} x^m \rd x | c = Definite Integral of Partial Derivative }} {{eqn | r = \int_0^1 x^m \paren {\ln x}^n \r...
:$\ds \int_0^1 x^m \paren {\ln x}^n \rd x = \frac {\paren {-1}^n \map \Gamma {n + 1} } {\paren {m + 1}^{n + 1} }$
From [[Primitive of Power]], we have: :$\ds \int_0^1 x^m \rd x = \frac 1 {m + 1}$ We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \frac {\d^n} {\d m^n} \int_0^1 x^m \rd x | r = \int_0^1 \frac {\partial^n} {\partial m^n} x^m \rd x | c = [[Definite Integral of Partial Derivative]] }} {{eqn | r = \int_0^1 x^m \paren {...
Definite Integral from 0 to 1 of Power of x by Power of Logarithm of x/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Definite_Integral_from_0_to_1_of_Power_of_x_by_Power_of_Logarithm_of_x
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Definite_Integral_from_0_to_1_of_Power_of_x_by_Power_of_Logarithm_of_x/Proof_2
[ "Definite Integrals involving Logarithm Function", "Definite Integral from 0 to 1 of Power of x by Power of Logarithm of x" ]
[]
[ "Primitive of Power", "Definite Integral of Partial Derivative", "Derivative of General Exponential Function", "Derivative of Natural Logarithm Function", "Nth Derivative of Natural Logarithm" ]
proofwiki-16193
Definite Integral to Infinity of Exponential of -a x by Sine of b x
:$\ds \int_0^\infty e^{-a x} \sin b x \rd x = \frac b {a^2 + b^2}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int_0^\infty e^{-a x} \sin b x \rd x | r = \intlimits {\frac {e^{-a x} \paren {-a \sin b x - b \cos b x} } {a^2 + b^2} } 0 \infty | c = Primitive of $e^{a x} \sin b x$ }} {{eqn | r = -\lim_{x \mathop \to \infty} \paren {\frac {e^{-a x} \paren {a \sin b x + b \cos b x} } {a^2 + b^2} } + \fra...
:$\ds \int_0^\infty e^{-a x} \sin b x \rd x = \frac b {a^2 + b^2}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int_0^\infty e^{-a x} \sin b x \rd x | r = \intlimits {\frac {e^{-a x} \paren {-a \sin b x - b \cos b x} } {a^2 + b^2} } 0 \infty | c = [[Primitive of Exponential of a x by Sine of b x|Primitive of $e^{a x} \sin b x$]] }} {{eqn | r = -\lim_{x \mathop \to \infty} \paren {\frac {e^{-a x} \par...
Definite Integral to Infinity of Exponential of -a x by Sine of b x
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Definite_Integral_to_Infinity_of_Exponential_of_-a_x_by_Sine_of_b_x
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Definite_Integral_to_Infinity_of_Exponential_of_-a_x_by_Sine_of_b_x
[ "Definite Integrals involving Sine Function", "Definite Integrals involving Exponential Function" ]
[]
[ "Primitive of Exponential of a x by Sine of b x", "Exponential of Zero", "Sine of Zero is Zero", "Cosine of Zero is One", "Linear Combination of Sine and Cosine", "Exponential Tends to Zero and Infinity", "Squeeze Theorem" ]
proofwiki-16194
Sum of Exponential of i k x
:$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n \map \exp {i k x} = \paren {i \sin \frac {n x} 2 + \cos \frac {n x} 2} \frac {\map \sin {\frac {\paren {n + 1} x} 2} } {\sin \frac x 2}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n \map \exp {i k x} | r = \frac {\map \exp {i x \paren {n + 1} } - 1} {\map \exp {i x} - 1} | c = Sum of Geometric Sequence }} {{eqn | r = \frac {\map \exp {\frac {i x \paren {n + 1} } 2} \paren {\map \exp {\frac {i x \paren {n + 1} } 2} - \map \exp {\frac {-i...
:$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n \map \exp {i k x} = \paren {i \sin \frac {n x} 2 + \cos \frac {n x} 2} \frac {\map \sin {\frac {\paren {n + 1} x} 2} } {\sin \frac x 2}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n \map \exp {i k x} | r = \frac {\map \exp {i x \paren {n + 1} } - 1} {\map \exp {i x} - 1} | c = [[Sum of Geometric Sequence]] }} {{eqn | r = \frac {\map \exp {\frac {i x \paren {n + 1} } 2} \paren {\map \exp {\frac {i x \paren {n + 1} } 2} - \map \exp {\frac...
Sum of Exponential of i k x
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Exponential_of_i_k_x
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Exponential_of_i_k_x
[ "Exponential Function" ]
[]
[ "Sum of Geometric Sequence", "Euler's Sine Identity", "Euler's Formula", "Category:Exponential Function" ]
proofwiki-16195
Möbius Transformation is Bijection/Restriction to Reals
Let $a, b, c, d \in \R$ be real numbers. Let $f: \R^* \to \R^*$ be the Möbius transformation restricted to the real numbers: :<nowiki>$\map f x = \begin {cases} \dfrac {a x + b} {c x + d} & : x \ne -\dfrac d c \\ \infty & : x = -\dfrac d c \\ \dfrac a c & : x = \infty \\ \infty & : x = \infty \text { and } c = 0 \end {...
First we note that as Real Addition is Closed and Real Multiplication is Closed: :$\Dom {\R^*} \subseteq \R^*$ {{explain|What is $\Dom {\R^*}$?}} Recall from Möbius Transformation is Bijection that the Möbius transformation on the extended complex plane is a bijection {{iff}} $a c - b d \ne 0$. From Restriction of Inje...
Let $a, b, c, d \in \R$ be [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]]. Let $f: \R^* \to \R^*$ be the [[Definition:Möbius Transformation on Real Numbers|Möbius transformation]] [[Definition:Restriction of Mapping|restricted]] to the [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]]: :<nowiki>$\map f x = \begin {cases} \dfrac {a x ...
First we note that as [[Real Addition is Closed]] and [[Real Multiplication is Closed]]: :$\Dom {\R^*} \subseteq \R^*$ {{explain|What is $\Dom {\R^*}$?}} Recall from [[Möbius Transformation is Bijection]] that the [[Definition:Möbius Transformation|Möbius transformation]] on the [[Definition:Extended Complex Plane|ext...
Möbius Transformation is Bijection/Restriction to Reals
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Möbius_Transformation_is_Bijection/Restriction_to_Reals
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Möbius_Transformation_is_Bijection/Restriction_to_Reals
[ "Möbius Transformation is Bijection" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Möbius Transformation/Real Numbers", "Definition:Restriction/Mapping", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Bijection" ]
[ "Real Addition is Closed", "Real Multiplication is Closed", "Möbius Transformation is Bijection", "Definition:Möbius Transformation", "Definition:Extended Complex Plane", "Definition:Bijection", "Restriction of Injection is Injection", "Definition:Injection", "Definition:Inverse Mapping", "Definit...
proofwiki-16196
Extension of Extension of Mapping is Extension
Let $A, B, C, S$ be sets such that $A \subseteq B \subseteq C$. Let $f: A \to S$, $g: B \to S$ and $h: C \to S$ be mappings such that: :$g$ is an extension of $f$ to $B$ :$h$ is an extension of $g$ to $C$. Then $h$ is an extension of $f$ to $C$.
By definition of extension: :$\forall x \in A: \map f x = \map g x$ and: :$\forall x \in B: \map g x = \map h x$ and so: :$\forall x \in A: \map g x = \map h x$ from which it follows that: :$\forall x \in A: \map f x = \map h x$ {{qed}}
Let $A, B, C, S$ be [[Definition:Set|sets]] such that $A \subseteq B \subseteq C$. Let $f: A \to S$, $g: B \to S$ and $h: C \to S$ be [[Definition:Mapping|mappings]] such that: :$g$ is an [[Definition:Extension of Mapping|extension]] of $f$ to $B$ :$h$ is an [[Definition:Extension of Mapping|extension]] of $g$ to $C$...
By definition of [[Definition:Extension of Mapping|extension]]: :$\forall x \in A: \map f x = \map g x$ and: :$\forall x \in B: \map g x = \map h x$ and so: :$\forall x \in A: \map g x = \map h x$ from which it follows that: :$\forall x \in A: \map f x = \map h x$ {{qed}}
Extension of Extension of Mapping is Extension
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Extension_of_Extension_of_Mapping_is_Extension
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Extension_of_Extension_of_Mapping_is_Extension
[ "Restrictions" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Extension of Mapping", "Definition:Extension of Mapping", "Definition:Extension of Mapping" ]
[ "Definition:Extension of Mapping" ]
proofwiki-16197
Indexed Cartesian Space is Set of all Mappings
Let $I$ be an indexing set. Let $\ds \prod_{i \mathop \in I} S$ denote the cartesian space of $S$ indexed by $I$. Then $\ds \prod_{i \mathop \in I} S$ is the set of all mappings from $I$ to $S$, and hence the notation: :$S^I := \ds \prod_{i \mathop \in I} S$
Let $\family {S_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an indexed family of sets. By definition of the Cartesian product of $\family {S_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$: :$(1): \quad \ds \prod_{i \mathop \in I} S_i := \set {f: \paren {f: I \to \bigcup_{i \mathop \in I} S_i} \land \paren {\forall i \in I: \paren {\map f i \in S_i} } }$ where $f...
Let $I$ be an [[Definition:Indexing Set|indexing set]]. Let $\ds \prod_{i \mathop \in I} S$ denote the [[Definition:Indexed Cartesian Space|cartesian space of $S$ indexed by $I$]]. Then $\ds \prod_{i \mathop \in I} S$ is the [[Definition:Set of All Mappings|set of all mappings]] from $I$ to $S$, and hence the notati...
Let $\family {S_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an [[Definition:Indexed Family of Sets|indexed family of sets]]. By definition of the [[Definition:Cartesian Product of Family/Definition 2|Cartesian product of $\family {S_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$]]: :$(1): \quad \ds \prod_{i \mathop \in I} S_i := \set {f: \paren {f: I \to \big...
Indexed Cartesian Space is Set of all Mappings
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Indexed_Cartesian_Space_is_Set_of_all_Mappings
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Indexed_Cartesian_Space_is_Set_of_all_Mappings
[ "Cartesian Product", "Indexed Families" ]
[ "Definition:Indexing Set", "Definition:Cartesian Product/Cartesian Space/Family of Sets", "Definition:Set of All Mappings" ]
[ "Definition:Indexing Set/Family of Sets", "Definition:Cartesian Product of Family/Definition 2", "Definition:Mapping", "Set Union is Idempotent" ]
proofwiki-16198
Definite Integral from 0 to 1 of Logarithm of x over One plus x
:$\ds \int_0^1 \frac {\ln x} {1 + x} \rd x = -\frac {\pi^2} {12}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int_0^1 \frac {\ln x} {1 + x} \rd x | r = \int_0^1 \frac {\ln x} {1 - \paren {-x} } \rd x }} {{eqn | r = \int_0^1 \ln x \paren {\sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \paren {-x}^n} \rd x | c = Sum of Infinite Geometric Sequence }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \paren {-1}^n \int_0^1 x^n \ln...
:$\ds \int_0^1 \frac {\ln x} {1 + x} \rd x = -\frac {\pi^2} {12}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int_0^1 \frac {\ln x} {1 + x} \rd x | r = \int_0^1 \frac {\ln x} {1 - \paren {-x} } \rd x }} {{eqn | r = \int_0^1 \ln x \paren {\sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \paren {-x}^n} \rd x | c = [[Sum of Infinite Geometric Sequence]] }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \paren {-1}^n \int_0^1 x^n...
Definite Integral from 0 to 1 of Logarithm of x over One plus x
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Definite_Integral_from_0_to_1_of_Logarithm_of_x_over_One_plus_x
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Definite_Integral_from_0_to_1_of_Logarithm_of_x_over_One_plus_x
[ "Definite Integrals involving Logarithm Function" ]
[]
[ "Sum of Infinite Geometric Sequence", "Fubini's Theorem", "Definite Integral from 0 to 1 of Power of x by Power of Logarithm of x", "Gamma Function Extends Factorial", "Sum of Reciprocals of Squares Alternating in Sign" ]
proofwiki-16199
Equivalence of Definitions of Convergent Sequence in Metric Space/Definition 1 iff Definition 2
Let $M = \struct {A, d}$ be a metric space or a pseudometric space. Let $\sequence {x_k}$ be a sequence in $A$. {{TFAE|def = Convergent Sequence|context = Metric Space|contextview = Metric Spaces}}
By definition of an open ball: :$\forall n \in \N: \map d {x_n, l} < \epsilon \iff x_n \in \map {B_\epsilon} l$ The result follows.
Let $M = \struct {A, d}$ be a [[Definition:Metric Space|metric space]] or a [[Definition:Pseudometric Space|pseudometric space]]. Let $\sequence {x_k}$ be a [[Definition:Sequence|sequence in $A$]]. {{TFAE|def = Convergent Sequence|context = Metric Space|contextview = Metric Spaces}}
By definition of an [[Definition:Open Ball of Metric Space|open ball]]: :$\forall n \in \N: \map d {x_n, l} < \epsilon \iff x_n \in \map {B_\epsilon} l$ The result follows.
Equivalence of Definitions of Convergent Sequence in Metric Space/Definition 1 iff Definition 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Convergent_Sequence_in_Metric_Space/Definition_1_iff_Definition_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Convergent_Sequence_in_Metric_Space/Definition_1_iff_Definition_2
[ "Equivalence of Definitions of Convergent Sequence in Metric Space" ]
[ "Definition:Metric Space", "Definition:Pseudometric/Pseudometric Space", "Definition:Sequence" ]
[ "Definition:Open Ball" ]