id
stringlengths
11
15
title
stringlengths
7
171
problem
stringlengths
9
4.33k
solution
stringlengths
6
19k
problem_wikitext
stringlengths
9
4.42k
solution_wikitext
stringlengths
7
19.1k
proof_title
stringlengths
9
171
theorem_url
stringlengths
34
198
proof_url
stringlengths
36
198
categories
listlengths
0
9
theorem_references
listlengths
0
36
proof_references
listlengths
0
253
proofwiki-20400
Quotient Mapping is Bounded in Normed Quotient Vector Space
Let $\Bbb F \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a normed vector space over $\Bbb F$. Let $N$ be a closed linear subspace of $X$. Let $\struct {X/N, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_{X/N} }$ be the normed quotient vector space associated with quotient vector space $X/N$. Let $\pi : X \to X/N$ be the quotient mapping associated with $X/N...
From Quotient Mapping is Linear Transformation: :$\pi$ is a linear transformation. Let $x \in X$. Note that from the definition of quotient norm, we have: :$\ds \norm {\map \pi x}_{X/N} = \inf_{z \in N} \norm {x - z}_X$ Note that since $0 \in N$, we have that: :$\norm x_X \in \set {\norm {x - z}_X : z \in N}$ so th...
Let $\Bbb F \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector space]] over $\Bbb F$. Let $N$ be a [[Definition:Closed Linear Subspace|closed linear subspace]] of $X$. Let $\struct {X/N, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_{X/N} }$ be the [[Definition:Normed Quotient Vector Space|normed quotient vector...
From [[Quotient Mapping is Linear Transformation]]: :$\pi$ is a [[Definition:Linear Transformation|linear transformation]]. Let $x \in X$. Note that from the definition of [[Definition:Quotient Norm|quotient norm]], we have: :$\ds \norm {\map \pi x}_{X/N} = \inf_{z \in N} \norm {x - z}_X$ Note that since $0 \in ...
Quotient Mapping is Bounded in Normed Quotient Vector Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quotient_Mapping_is_Bounded_in_Normed_Quotient_Vector_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quotient_Mapping_is_Bounded_in_Normed_Quotient_Vector_Space
[ "Quotient Mappings", "Normed Quotient Vector Spaces", "Bounded Linear Transformations" ]
[ "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Closed Linear Subspace", "Definition:Normed Quotient Vector Space", "Definition:Quotient Vector Space", "Definition:Quotient Mapping", "Definition:Bounded Linear Transformation" ]
[ "Quotient Mapping is Linear Transformation", "Definition:Linear Transformation", "Definition:Quotient Norm", "Definition:Infimum of Set/Real Numbers", "Definition:Bounded Linear Transformation", "Category:Quotient Mappings", "Category:Normed Quotient Vector Spaces", "Category:Bounded Linear Transforma...
proofwiki-20401
Bing's Metrization Theorem
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. Then: :$T$ is metrizable {{iff}} $T$ is regular and has a $\sigma$-discrete basis
{{proof wanted}} {{Namedfor|R.H. Bing|cat = Bing}}
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Then: :$T$ is [[Definition:Metrizable Space|metrizable]] {{iff}} $T$ is [[Definition:Regular Space|regular]] and has a [[Definition:Sigma-Discrete Basis|$\sigma$-discrete basis]]
{{proof wanted}} {{Namedfor|R.H. Bing|cat = Bing}}
Bing's Metrization Theorem
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Bing's_Metrization_Theorem
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Bing's_Metrization_Theorem
[ "Metrization Theorems", "Regular Spaces", "Metrizable Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Metrizable Space", "Definition:Regular Space", "Definition:Sigma-Discrete Basis" ]
[]
proofwiki-20402
Cantor's Diagonal Argument/Corollary
Let $S$ be a set such that $\card S > 1$, that is, such that $S$ is not a singleton. Let $\mathbb G$ be the set of all mappings from the integers $\Z$ to $S$: :$\mathbb G = \set {f: \Z \to S}$ Then $\mathbb G$ is uncountably infinite.
Let $\mathbb F$ be the set of all mappings from the natural numbers $\N$ to $S$: :$\mathbb F = \set {f: \N \to S}$ From Cantor's Diagonal Argument, $\mathbb F$ is uncountably infinite. Let $s \in S$ be an arbitrary distinguished element of $S$. Let $\mathbb H$ be the set of mappings $h: \Z \to S$ defined as: :$\forall ...
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]] such that $\card S > 1$, that is, such that $S$ is not a [[Definition:Singleton|singleton]]. Let $\mathbb G$ be the [[Definition:Set|set]] of all [[Definition:Mapping|mappings]] from the [[Definition:Integer|integers]] $\Z$ to $S$: :$\mathbb G = \set {f: \Z \to S}$ Then $\mathbb G$...
Let $\mathbb F$ be the [[Definition:Set|set]] of all [[Definition:Mapping|mappings]] from the [[Definition:Natural Numbers|natural numbers]] $\N$ to $S$: :$\mathbb F = \set {f: \N \to S}$ From [[Cantor's Diagonal Argument]], $\mathbb F$ is [[Definition:Uncountable Set|uncountably infinite]]. Let $s \in S$ be an arbit...
Cantor's Diagonal Argument/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor's_Diagonal_Argument/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor's_Diagonal_Argument/Corollary
[ "Cantor's Diagonal Argument" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Singleton", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Uncountable/Set" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Cantor's Diagonal Argument", "Definition:Uncountable/Set", "Definition:Distinguished Element", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Set Equivalence", "Definition:Uncountable/Set", "Definition:Uncountable/Set", ...
proofwiki-20403
Quotient Mapping Maps Unit Open Ball in Normed Vector Space to Unit Open Ball in Normed Quotient Vector Space
Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be a normed vector space. Let $N$ be a closed linear subspace of $X$. Let $\struct {X/N, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be the normed quotient vector space associated with the quotient vector space $X/N$. Let $B_X$ be the unit open ball in $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$. Let $B_{X/N...
From Quotient Mapping is Bounded in Normed Quotient Vector Space, we have: :$\norm {\map \pi x}_{X/N} \le \norm x$ So if $x \in B_X$, we have $\norm x < 1$ and hence: :$\norm {\map \pi x}_{X/N} < 1$ So $\map \pi x \in B_{X/N}$. So we have: :$\map \pi {B_X} \subseteq B_{X/N}$ Conversely, let $\mathbf x \in B_{X/N}$ ...
Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be a [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector space]]. Let $N$ be a [[Definition:Closed Linear Subspace|closed linear subspace]] of $X$. Let $\struct {X/N, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be the [[Definition:Normed Quotient Vector Space|normed quotient vector space]] associated wi...
From [[Quotient Mapping is Bounded in Normed Quotient Vector Space]], we have: :$\norm {\map \pi x}_{X/N} \le \norm x$ So if $x \in B_X$, we have $\norm x < 1$ and hence: :$\norm {\map \pi x}_{X/N} < 1$ So $\map \pi x \in B_{X/N}$. So we have: :$\map \pi {B_X} \subseteq B_{X/N}$ Conversely, let $\mathbf x \i...
Quotient Mapping Maps Unit Open Ball in Normed Vector Space to Unit Open Ball in Normed Quotient Vector Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quotient_Mapping_Maps_Unit_Open_Ball_in_Normed_Vector_Space_to_Unit_Open_Ball_in_Normed_Quotient_Vector_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quotient_Mapping_Maps_Unit_Open_Ball_in_Normed_Vector_Space_to_Unit_Open_Ball_in_Normed_Quotient_Vector_Space
[ "Quotient Mappings", "Normed Quotient Vector Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Closed Linear Subspace", "Definition:Normed Quotient Vector Space", "Definition:Quotient Vector Space", "Definition:Unit Open Ball", "Definition:Unit Open Ball", "Definition:Quotient Mapping" ]
[ "Quotient Mapping is Bounded in Normed Quotient Vector Space", "Kernel of Quotient Mapping", "Quotient Mapping is Linear Transformation", "Category:Quotient Mappings", "Category:Normed Quotient Vector Spaces" ]
proofwiki-20404
Separable Normed Vector Space Isometrically Isomorphic to Linear Subspace of Space of Bounded Sequences
Let $\Bbb F \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be a separable normed vector space over $\Bbb F$. Let $\struct {\map {\ell^\infty} {\Bbb F}, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_\infty}$ be the normed vector space of bounded sequences. Then there exists a linear subspace $Y$ of $\map {\ell^\infty} {\Bbb F}$ suc...
Let $\mathcal S = \set {x_n : n \in \N}$ be a countable everywhere dense subset of $X$. By Existence of Support Functional, for each $n \in \N$ there exists $f_n \in X^\ast$ such that $\norm {f_n}_{X^\ast} = 1$ and $\map {f_n} {x_n} = \norm {x_n}$. Then, for each $x \in X$, we have: :$\cmod {\map {f_n} x} \le \norm x...
Let $\Bbb F \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be a [[Definition:Separable Space|separable]] [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector space]] over $\Bbb F$. Let $\struct {\map {\ell^\infty} {\Bbb F}, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_\infty}$ be the [[Definition:Space of Bounded Sequences/Normed Vec...
Let $\mathcal S = \set {x_n : n \in \N}$ be a [[Definition:Countable Set|countable]] [[Definition:Everywhere Dense|everywhere dense]] [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $X$. By [[Existence of Support Functional]], for each $n \in \N$ there exists $f_n \in X^\ast$ such that $\norm {f_n}_{X^\ast} = 1$ and $\map {f_n} {x_n...
Separable Normed Vector Space Isometrically Isomorphic to Linear Subspace of Space of Bounded Sequences
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Separable_Normed_Vector_Space_Isometrically_Isomorphic_to_Linear_Subspace_of_Space_of_Bounded_Sequences
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Separable_Normed_Vector_Space_Isometrically_Isomorphic_to_Linear_Subspace_of_Space_of_Bounded_Sequences
[ "Normed Vector Spaces", "Space of Bounded Sequences", "Isometric Isomorphisms (Normed Vector Spaces)", "Separable Spaces", "Normed Vector Spaces", "Space of Bounded Sequences" ]
[ "Definition:Separable Space", "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Space of Bounded Sequences/Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Linear Subspace", "Definition:Isometric Isomorphism/Normed Vector Space" ]
[ "Definition:Countable Set", "Definition:Everywhere Dense", "Definition:Subset", "Existence of Support Functional", "Supremum Operator Norm as Universal Upper Bound", "Image of Vector Subspace under Linear Transformation is Vector Subspace", "Definition:Vector Subspace", "Definition:Linear Isometry", ...
proofwiki-20405
Characterization of Complete Normed Quotient Vector Spaces
Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_X}$ be a normed vector space. Let $N$ be a closed linear subspace of $X$. Let $\struct {X/N, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_{X/N} }$ be the normed quotient vector space associated with the quotient vector space $X/N$. Let $\norm {\, \cdot \,}_N$ be the norm on $N$ given by restricting the nor...
Let $\pi : X \to X/N$ be the quotient mapping associated with $X/N$.
Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_X}$ be a [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector space]]. Let $N$ be a [[Definition:Closed Linear Subspace|closed linear subspace]] of $X$. Let $\struct {X/N, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_{X/N} }$ be the [[Definition:Normed Quotient Vector Space|normed quotient vector space]] assoc...
Let $\pi : X \to X/N$ be the [[Definition:Quotient Mapping|quotient mapping]] associated with $X/N$.
Characterization of Complete Normed Quotient Vector Spaces
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characterization_of_Complete_Normed_Quotient_Vector_Spaces
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characterization_of_Complete_Normed_Quotient_Vector_Spaces
[ "Banach Spaces", "Normed Quotient Vector Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Closed Linear Subspace", "Definition:Normed Quotient Vector Space", "Definition:Quotient Vector Space", "Definition:Norm/Vector Space", "Definition:Norm/Vector Space", "Definition:Banach Space", "Definition:Banach Space" ]
[ "Definition:Quotient Mapping" ]
proofwiki-20406
Bounded Linear Transformation preserves Cauchy Sequences
Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_X}$ and $\struct {Y, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_Y}$ be normed vector spaces. Let $T : X \to Y$ be a bounded linear transformation. Let $\sequence {x_n}_{n \mathop \in \N}$ be a Cauchy sequence in $X$. Then $\sequence {T x_n}_{n \mathop \in \N}$ is a Cauchy sequence in $Y$.
Since $T$ is a bounded linear transformation, there exists $M > 0$ such that: :$\norm {T x}_Y \le M \norm x_X$ for all $x \in X$. So, since $T$ is linear, we have: :$\norm {T x_n - T x_m}_Y \le M \norm {x_n - x_m}_X$ Let $\epsilon > 0$. Since $\sequence {x_n}_{n \mathop \in \N}$ is Cauchy, there exists $N \in \N$ suc...
Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_X}$ and $\struct {Y, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_Y}$ be [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector spaces]]. Let $T : X \to Y$ be a [[Definition:Bounded Linear Transformation|bounded linear transformation]]. Let $\sequence {x_n}_{n \mathop \in \N}$ be a [[Definition:Cauchy Sequence in...
Since $T$ is a [[Definition:Bounded Linear Transformation|bounded linear transformation]], there exists $M > 0$ such that: :$\norm {T x}_Y \le M \norm x_X$ for all $x \in X$. So, since $T$ is [[Definition:Linear Transformation|linear]], we have: :$\norm {T x_n - T x_m}_Y \le M \norm {x_n - x_m}_X$ Let $\epsilon ...
Bounded Linear Transformation preserves Cauchy Sequences
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Bounded_Linear_Transformation_preserves_Cauchy_Sequences
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Bounded_Linear_Transformation_preserves_Cauchy_Sequences
[ "Bounded Linear Transformations" ]
[ "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Bounded Linear Transformation", "Definition:Cauchy Sequence/Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Cauchy Sequence/Normed Vector Space" ]
[ "Definition:Bounded Linear Transformation", "Definition:Linear Transformation", "Definition:Cauchy Sequence/Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Cauchy Sequence/Normed Vector Space", "Category:Bounded Linear Transformations" ]
proofwiki-20407
Number of Atoms in Observable Universe
The number of atoms in the observable universe is approximately $10^{80}$.
According to our current observations and understanding of the {{WP|Universe}}, the age of the universe is estimated to be $13.787$ billion years. That means the light from the most distant galaxies has traveled $13.787$ billion years to reach us. The speed of light is $299 \, 792 \, 458 \ \text {m s}^{-1}$ This implie...
The number of [[Definition:Atom (Physics)|atoms]] in the [[Definition:Observable Universe|observable universe]] is approximately $10^{80}$.
According to our current observations and understanding of the {{WP|Universe}}, the [[Definition:Age (Time)|age]] of the [[Definition:Physical Universe|universe]] is estimated to be $13.787$ [[Definition:Billion (Short Scale) |billion]] [[Definition:Year|years]]. That means the [[Definition:Light (Radiation)|light]] f...
Number of Atoms in Observable Universe
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_of_Atoms_in_Observable_Universe
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_of_Atoms_in_Observable_Universe
[ "Atoms" ]
[ "Definition:Atom (Physics)", "Definition:Observable Universe" ]
[ "Definition:Age (Time)", "Definition:Physical Universe", "Definition:Billion (Short Scale) ", "Definition:Time/Unit/Year", "Definition:Light (Radiation)", "Definition:Galaxy", "Definition:Billion (Short Scale) ", "Definition:Time/Unit/Year", "Definition:Speed of Light", "Definition:Sphere/Geometry...
proofwiki-20408
Metrization of Regular Second Countable Space
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a $T_1$ space. {{TFAE}} :$(1): \quad T$ is regular and second-countable :$(2): \quad T$ is homeomorphic to a metric subspace of the Hilbert cube $I^\omega$ :$(3): \quad T$ is metrizable and separable
=== Condition $(1)$ implies Condition $(2)$ === Follows immediately from Regular Second-Countable Space is Homeomorphic to Subspace of Hilbert Cube. {{qed|lemma}}
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:T1 Space|$T_1$ space]]. {{TFAE}} :$(1): \quad T$ is [[Definition:Regular|regular]] and [[Definition:Second-Countable Space|second-countable]] :$(2): \quad T$ is [[Definition:Homeomorphism|homeomorphic]] to a [[Definition:Metric Subspace|metric subspace]] of the [[Definiti...
=== Condition $(1)$ implies Condition $(2)$ === Follows immediately from [[Regular Second-Countable Space is Homeomorphic to Subspace of Hilbert Cube]]. {{qed|lemma}}
Metrization of Regular Second Countable Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Metrization_of_Regular_Second_Countable_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Metrization_of_Regular_Second_Countable_Space
[ "Metrizable Spaces", "Regular Spaces", "Separable Spaces", "Second-Countable Spaces", "T1 Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:T1 Space", "Definition:Regular", "Definition:Second-Countable Space", "Definition:Homeomorphism", "Definition:Metric Subspace", "Definition:Hilbert Cube", "Definition:Metrizable", "Definition:Separable" ]
[ "Regular Second-Countable Space is Homeomorphic to Subspace of Hilbert Cube" ]
proofwiki-20409
Equivalence of Definitions of Sine and Cosine
In the following, $\theta$ understood to take values in $\hointr 0 {2 \pi}$.
Consider the following vector-valued function $\mathbf f : \R \to {\closedint {-1} 1}^2$: :$\map {\mathbf f} t = \tuple {\cos t, \sin t}$ where $\cos t$ and $\sin t$ are defined analytically. Then, for any $t$ the distance to the origin is: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \norm {\map {\mathbf f} t - \bszero} | r = \nor...
In the following, $\theta$ understood to take values in $\hointr 0 {2 \pi}$.
Consider the following [[Definition:Vector-Valued Function|vector-valued function]] $\mathbf f : \R \to {\closedint {-1} 1}^2$: :$\map {\mathbf f} t = \tuple {\cos t, \sin t}$ where $\cos t$ and $\sin t$ are [[Definition:Real Cosine Function|defined]] [[Definition:Real Sine Function|analytically]]. Then, for any $t$ ...
Equivalence of Definitions of Sine and Cosine
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Sine_and_Cosine
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Sine_and_Cosine
[ "Sine Function", "Cosine Function", "Definition Equivalences" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Vector-Valued Function", "Definition:Cosine/Real Function", "Definition:Sine/Real Function", "Definition:Distance between Points", "Definition:Coordinate System/Origin", "Sum of Squares of Sine and Cosine", "Definition:Unit Circle", "Definition:Arc Length", "Arc Length for Parametric Equ...
proofwiki-20410
Construction of Transitive Closure of Relation
Let $\RR$ be a relation. Let $\RR^+$ be the relation which is constructed from $\RR$ as follows: :$(1): \quad$ If $\tuple {a, b} \in \RR$, then $\tuple {a, b} \in \RR^+$ :$(2): \quad$ If $\tuple {a, b} \in \RR^+$ and $\tuple {b, c} \in \RR$, then $\tuple {a, c} \in \RR^+$ :$(3): \quad$ Nothing is in $\RR^+$ unless it s...
Let $\tuple {x, y} \in \R^+$ from rules $(1)$ and $(2)$. Then either: :$\tuple {x, y}$ belongs there because $\RR \subseteq \RR^+$ or: :$\tuple {x, y}$ belongs there, because if it were not then $\RR^+$ would not be transitive. It remains to be shown that $\RR^+$ is in fact transitive. {{finish|"Easy inductive proof", ...
Let $\RR$ be a [[Definition:Relation|relation]]. Let $\RR^+$ be the [[Definition:Relation|relation]] which is constructed from $\RR$ as follows: :$(1): \quad$ If $\tuple {a, b} \in \RR$, then $\tuple {a, b} \in \RR^+$ :$(2): \quad$ If $\tuple {a, b} \in \RR^+$ and $\tuple {b, c} \in \RR$, then $\tuple {a, c} \in \RR...
Let $\tuple {x, y} \in \R^+$ from rules $(1)$ and $(2)$. Then either: :$\tuple {x, y}$ belongs there because $\RR \subseteq \RR^+$ or: :$\tuple {x, y}$ belongs there, because if it were not then $\RR^+$ would not be [[Definition:Transitive Relation|transitive]]. It remains to be shown that $\RR^+$ is in fact [[Defin...
Construction of Transitive Closure of Relation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Construction_of_Transitive_Closure_of_Relation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Construction_of_Transitive_Closure_of_Relation
[ "Transitive Closures" ]
[ "Definition:Relation", "Definition:Relation", "Definition:Transitive Closure of Relation" ]
[ "Definition:Transitive Relation", "Definition:Transitive Relation", "Definition:Smallest Set by Set Inclusion", "Definition:Transitive Relation", "Definition:Subset" ]
proofwiki-20411
Sub-Basis for Initial Topology in terms of Sub-Bases of Target Spaces
Let $X$ be a set. Let $I$ be an indexing set. Let $\family {\struct {Y_i, \tau_i} }_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an indexed family of topological spaces indexed by $I$. For each $i \in I$, let $S_i$ be a synthetic basis for $\struct {Y_i, \tau_i}$. Let $\family {f_i: X \to Y_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an indexed family of mapp...
Note that by the definition of the initial topology, $\tau$ is generated by the synthetic sub-basis: :$\SS' = \set {f_i^{-1} \sqbrk U : i \in I, \, U \in \tau_i}$ Since $S_i \subseteq \tau_i$ for each $i \in I$, we have: :$\SS \subseteq \SS'$ and hence: :$\map \tau \SS \subseteq \map \tau {\SS'} = \tau$ where $\tau...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. Let $I$ be an [[Definition:Indexing Set|indexing set]]. Let $\family {\struct {Y_i, \tau_i} }_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an [[Definition:Indexed Family|indexed family]] of [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]] [[Definition:Indexing Set|indexed]] by $I$. For each $i \in I...
Note that by the definition of the [[Definition:Initial Topology|initial topology]], $\tau$ is [[Definition:Topology Generated by Synthetic Sub-Basis|generated]] by the [[Definition:Synthetic Sub-Basis|synthetic sub-basis]]: :$\SS' = \set {f_i^{-1} \sqbrk U : i \in I, \, U \in \tau_i}$ Since $S_i \subseteq \tau_i$ ...
Sub-Basis for Initial Topology in terms of Sub-Bases of Target Spaces
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sub-Basis_for_Initial_Topology_in_terms_of_Sub-Bases_of_Target_Spaces
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sub-Basis_for_Initial_Topology_in_terms_of_Sub-Bases_of_Target_Spaces
[ "Initial Topologies", "Initial Topology", "Initial Topology", "Topological Bases" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Indexing Set", "Definition:Indexing Set/Family", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Indexing Set", "Definition:Sub-Basis/Synthetic Sub-Basis", "Definition:Indexing Set/Family", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Indexing Set", "Definition:Initial Topology", ...
[ "Definition:Initial Topology", "Definition:Topology Generated by Synthetic Sub-Basis", "Definition:Sub-Basis/Synthetic Sub-Basis", "Definition:Topology Generated by Synthetic Sub-Basis", "Definition:Sub-Basis/Synthetic Sub-Basis", "Definition:Indexing Set", "Preimage of Union under Mapping", "Preimage...
proofwiki-20412
Sequence of Natural Powers of Right Shift Operator in 2-Sequence Space does not Converge in Strong Operator Topology
Let $\struct {\ell^2, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_2}$ be the $2$-sequence normed vector space. Let $\map {CL} {\ell^2} := \map {CL} {\ell^2, \ell^2}$ be the continuous linear transformation space. Let $R \in \map {CL} {\ell^2}$ be the right shift operator over $\ell^2$. Let $\sequence {R^n}_{n \mathop \in \N}$ be a sequence. L...
Let $\mathbf e_1 = \tuple {1, 0, \ldots} \in \ell^2$ Then $R^n \mathbf e_1 = \tuple {\underbrace {\ldots, 0}_{n \text{ terms} }, 1, 0, \ldots}$ So: :$\forall n \in \N : \norm {R^n \mathbf e_1}_2 = 1$ Therefore: :$\ds \lim_{n \mathop \to \infty} \norm {R^n \mathbf e_1}_2 = 1$ Hence, $\sequence {R^n}_{n \mathop \in \N}$ ...
Let $\struct {\ell^2, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_2}$ be the [[P-Sequence Space with P-Norm forms Normed Vector Space|$2$-sequence normed vector space]]. Let $\map {CL} {\ell^2} := \map {CL} {\ell^2, \ell^2}$ be the [[Definition:Continuous Linear Transformation Space|continuous linear transformation space]]. Let $R \in \map ...
Let $\mathbf e_1 = \tuple {1, 0, \ldots} \in \ell^2$ Then $R^n \mathbf e_1 = \tuple {\underbrace {\ldots, 0}_{n \text{ terms} }, 1, 0, \ldots}$ So: :$\forall n \in \N : \norm {R^n \mathbf e_1}_2 = 1$ Therefore: :$\ds \lim_{n \mathop \to \infty} \norm {R^n \mathbf e_1}_2 = 1$ Hence, $\sequence {R^n}_{n \mathop \in...
Sequence of Natural Powers of Right Shift Operator in 2-Sequence Space does not Converge in Strong Operator Topology
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sequence_of_Natural_Powers_of_Right_Shift_Operator_in_2-Sequence_Space_does_not_Converge_in_Strong_Operator_Topology
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sequence_of_Natural_Powers_of_Right_Shift_Operator_in_2-Sequence_Space_does_not_Converge_in_Strong_Operator_Topology
[ "Convergence", "Operator Theory" ]
[ "P-Sequence Space with P-Norm forms Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Continuous Linear Transformation Space", "Definition:Right Shift Operator", "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Zero Mapping/Vector Space", "Definition:Convergent Sequence in Weak Operator Topology", "Definition:Strong Operator Topolog...
[ "Definition:Convergent Sequence in Strong Operator Topology", "Definition:Strong Operator Topology" ]
proofwiki-20413
Pointwise Minimum of Metric and Positive Real Number is Topologically Equivalent Metric
Let $\struct {X, d}$ be a metric space. Let $c > 0$ be a real number. For each $x, y \in X$, define: :$\map {d'} {x, y} = \min \set {\map d {x, y}, c}$ Then $d'$ is a metric that is topologically equivalent to $d$.
=== {{Metric-space-axiom|1|nolink}} === Suppose that $x, y \in X$ are such that: :$\map {d'} {x, y} = 0$ Since $c > 0$, this implies that: :$\map d {x, y} = 0$ Since $d$ is a metric, we have $x = y$ by {{Metric-space-axiom|1}} for $d$. Hence {{Metric-space-axiom|1}} is fulfilled. {{qed|lemma}}
Let $\struct {X, d}$ be a [[Definition:Metric Space|metric space]]. Let $c > 0$ be a [[Definition:Real Number|real number]]. For each $x, y \in X$, define: :$\map {d'} {x, y} = \min \set {\map d {x, y}, c}$ Then $d'$ is a [[Definition:Metric|metric]] that is [[Definition:Topologically Equivalent Metrics|topolog...
=== {{Metric-space-axiom|1|nolink}} === Suppose that $x, y \in X$ are such that: :$\map {d'} {x, y} = 0$ Since $c > 0$, this implies that: :$\map d {x, y} = 0$ Since $d$ is a [[Definition:Metric|metric]], we have $x = y$ by {{Metric-space-axiom|1}} for $d$. Hence {{Metric-space-axiom|1}} is fulfilled. {{qed|le...
Pointwise Minimum of Metric and Positive Real Number is Topologically Equivalent Metric
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Pointwise_Minimum_of_Metric_and_Positive_Real_Number_is_Topologically_Equivalent_Metric
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Pointwise_Minimum_of_Metric_and_Positive_Real_Number_is_Topologically_Equivalent_Metric
[ "Metric Spaces", "Topologically Equivalent Metrics" ]
[ "Definition:Metric Space", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Metric Space/Metric", "Definition:Topologically Equivalent Metrics" ]
[ "Definition:Metric Space/Metric", "Definition:Metric Space/Metric" ]
proofwiki-20414
Composition of Continuous Linear Transformations is Continuous Linear Transformation
Let $K$ be a field. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_X}$, $\struct {Y, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_Y}$, $\struct{Z, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_Z}$ be normed vector spaces over $K$. $\map {CL} {X, Y}$ be the continuous linear transformation space. Let $\norm {\, \cdot \,}$ be the supremum operator norm. Let $S \circ T : X \to Z$ b...
=== Linearity === Follows from Composition of Linear Transformations is Linear Transformation.
Let $K$ be a [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]]. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_X}$, $\struct {Y, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_Y}$, $\struct{Z, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_Z}$ be [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector spaces]] over $K$. $\map {CL} {X, Y}$ be the [[Definition:Continuous Linear Transformation S...
=== Linearity === Follows from [[Composition of Linear Transformations is Linear Transformation]].
Composition of Continuous Linear Transformations is Continuous Linear Transformation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Composition_of_Continuous_Linear_Transformations_is_Continuous_Linear_Transformation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Composition_of_Continuous_Linear_Transformations_is_Continuous_Linear_Transformation
[ "Functional Analysis", "Mapping Theory", "Continuity", "Linear Transformations" ]
[ "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Continuous Linear Transformation Space", "Definition:Supremum Operator Norm", "Definition:Composition of Mappings" ]
[ "Composition of Linear Transformations is Linear Transformation" ]
proofwiki-20415
Characterization of Fineness of Topology in terms of Topological Bases
Let $X$ be a set. Let $\tau$ and $\tau'$ be topologies on $X$. Let $\BB \subseteq \tau$ be a basis for $\tau$ and $\BB' \subseteq \tau'$ be a basis for $\tau'$. {{TFAE}} :$(1): \quad$ $\tau'$ is finer than $\tau$ :$(2): \quad$ for each $x \in X$ and each $B \in \BB$ containing $x$, there exists $B' \in \BB'$ such that...
=== $(1)$ implies $(2)$ === Let $x \in X$ and $B \in \BB$ contain $x$. Since $\tau'$ is finer than $\tau$, we have that $B \in \tau'$. Since $\BB'$ is a basis for $\tau'$, there exists a subset $\set {B'_\alpha : \alpha \in I} \subseteq \BB'$ such that: :$\ds B = \bigcup_{\alpha \mathop \in I} B'_\alpha$ from Open Se...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. Let $\tau$ and $\tau'$ be [[Definition:Topology|topologies]] on $X$. Let $\BB \subseteq \tau$ be a [[Definition:Basis (Topology)|basis]] for $\tau$ and $\BB' \subseteq \tau'$ be a [[Definition:Basis (Topology)|basis]] for $\tau'$. {{TFAE}} :$(1): \quad$ $\tau'$ is [[Definition...
=== $(1)$ implies $(2)$ === Let $x \in X$ and $B \in \BB$ contain $x$. Since $\tau'$ is [[Definition:Finer Topology|finer]] than $\tau$, we have that $B \in \tau'$. Since $\BB'$ is a [[Definition:Basis (Topology)|basis]] for $\tau'$, there exists a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] $\set {B'_\alpha : \alpha \in I} \subs...
Characterization of Fineness of Topology in terms of Topological Bases
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characterization_of_Fineness_of_Topology_in_terms_of_Topological_Bases
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characterization_of_Fineness_of_Topology_in_terms_of_Topological_Bases
[ "Topological Bases" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Topology", "Definition:Basis (Topology)", "Definition:Basis (Topology)", "Definition:Finer Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Finer Topology", "Definition:Basis (Topology)", "Definition:Subset", "Open Set is Union of Elements of Basis", "Set is Subset of Union", "Definition:Basis (Topology)", "Definition:Subset", "Open Set is Union of Elements of Basis" ]
proofwiki-20416
Modulus of Linear Functional on Vector Space is Seminorm
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a vector space over $\GF$. Let $f : X \to \GF$ be a linear functional. Define $p_f : X \to \R_{\ge 0}$ by: :$\map {p_f} x = \cmod {\map f x}$ for each $x \in X$. Then $p_f$ is a seminorm.
=== Proof of {{SeminormAxiom|2}} === For each $\lambda \in \GF$ and $x \in X$, we have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {p_f} {\lambda x} | r = \cmod {\map f {\lambda x} } }} {{eqn | r = \cmod {\lambda \map f x} | c = since $f$ is linear }} {{eqn | r = \cmod \lambda \cmod {\map f x} }} {{eqn | r = \cmod \lambda \ma...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Vector Space|vector space]] over $\GF$. Let $f : X \to \GF$ be a [[Definition:Linear Functional|linear functional]]. Define $p_f : X \to \R_{\ge 0}$ by: :$\map {p_f} x = \cmod {\map f x}$ for each $x \in X$. Then $p_f$ is a [[Definition:Seminorm|seminorm]...
=== Proof of {{SeminormAxiom|2}} === For each $\lambda \in \GF$ and $x \in X$, we have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {p_f} {\lambda x} | r = \cmod {\map f {\lambda x} } }} {{eqn | r = \cmod {\lambda \map f x} | c = since $f$ is [[Definition:Linear Functional|linear]] }} {{eqn | r = \cmod \lambda \cmod {\map f ...
Modulus of Linear Functional on Vector Space is Seminorm
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Modulus_of_Linear_Functional_on_Vector_Space_is_Seminorm
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Modulus_of_Linear_Functional_on_Vector_Space_is_Seminorm
[ "Seminorms" ]
[ "Definition:Vector Space", "Definition:Linear Functional", "Definition:Seminorm" ]
[ "Definition:Linear Functional", "Definition:Linear Functional" ]
proofwiki-20417
Initial Topology on Vector Space Generated by Linear Functionals is Locally Convex
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a vector space over $\GF$. Let $F$ be a set of linear functionals on $X$ that form a vector space over $\GF$. That is, for each $\lambda, \mu \in \GF$ and $f, g \in F$, we have: :$\lambda f + \mu g \in F$ Let $\tau$ be the initial topology on $X$ generated by $F$. For each $f ...
Let $\tau'$ be the standard topology on the locally convex space. From definition, a sub-basis for $\tau'$ is given by: :$\SS' = \set {\map {B_{p_f} } {\epsilon, x} : f \in F, \, \epsilon > 0, \, x \in X}$ where: :$\map {B_{p_f} } {\epsilon, x} = \set {y \in X : \map {p_f} {y - x} < \epsilon}$ For each $u \in \GF$, l...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Vector Space|vector space]] over $\GF$. Let $F$ be a set of [[Definition:Linear Functional|linear functionals]] on $X$ that form a [[Definition:Vector Space|vector space]] over $\GF$. That is, for each $\lambda, \mu \in \GF$ and $f, g \in F$, we have: :$\lam...
Let $\tau'$ be the [[Definition:Locally Convex Space/Standard Topology|standard topology]] on the [[Definition:Locally Convex Space|locally convex space]]. From definition, a [[Definition:Sub-Basis|sub-basis]] for $\tau'$ is given by: :$\SS' = \set {\map {B_{p_f} } {\epsilon, x} : f \in F, \, \epsilon > 0, \, x \in ...
Initial Topology on Vector Space Generated by Linear Functionals is Locally Convex
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Initial_Topology_on_Vector_Space_Generated_by_Linear_Functionals_is_Locally_Convex
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Initial_Topology_on_Vector_Space_Generated_by_Linear_Functionals_is_Locally_Convex
[ "Locally Convex Spaces", "Linear Functionals", "Initial Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Vector Space", "Definition:Linear Functional", "Definition:Vector Space", "Definition:Initial Topology", "Definition:Locally Convex Space/Standard Topology", "Definition:Locally Convex Space" ]
[ "Definition:Locally Convex Space/Standard Topology", "Definition:Locally Convex Space", "Definition:Sub-Basis", "Open Balls form Basis for Open Sets of Metric Space", "Definition:Basis (Topology)", "Sub-Basis for Initial Topology in terms of Sub-Bases of Target Spaces", "Definition:Sub-Basis", "Linear...
proofwiki-20418
Linearly Independent Set is Contained in some Basis/Infinite Dimensional Case
Let $K$ be a field. Let $E$ be a vector space over $K$. Let $H$ be a linearly independent subset of $E$. There exists a basis $B$ for $E$ such that $H \subseteq B$.
Let: :$\SS = \set {L \supseteq H : L \subseteq E \text { is linearly independent} }$ We have $H \in \SS$, so certainly $\SS \ne \O$. With view to apply Zorn's Lemma, we show that every non-empty $\subseteq$-chain in $\SS$ has an upper bound. Let $\CC$ be a non-empty $\subseteq$-chain in $\SS$. Let: :$\ds C = \bigcup ...
Let $K$ be a [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]]. Let $E$ be a [[Definition:Vector Space|vector space]] over $K$. Let $H$ be a [[Definition:Linearly Independent Set|linearly independent subset]] of $E$. There exists a [[Definition:Basis of Vector Space|basis]] $B$ for $E$ such that $H \subseteq B$.
Let: :$\SS = \set {L \supseteq H : L \subseteq E \text { is linearly independent} }$ We have $H \in \SS$, so certainly $\SS \ne \O$. With view to apply [[Zorn's Lemma]], we show that every [[Definition:Non-Empty Set|non-empty]] [[Definition:Chain (Order Theory)|$\subseteq$-chain]] in $\SS$ has an [[Definition:Upper...
Linearly Independent Set is Contained in some Basis/Infinite Dimensional Case
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Linearly_Independent_Set_is_Contained_in_some_Basis/Infinite_Dimensional_Case
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Linearly_Independent_Set_is_Contained_in_some_Basis/Infinite_Dimensional_Case
[ "Linearly Independent Set is Contained in some Basis" ]
[ "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Vector Space", "Definition:Linearly Independent/Set", "Definition:Basis of Vector Space" ]
[ "Zorn's Lemma", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Chain (Order Theory)", "Definition:Upper Bound of Set", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Chain (Order Theory)", "Definition:Chain (Order Theory)", "Definition:Linearly Independent/Set", "Definition:Linearly Independent/Set", "Definitio...
proofwiki-20419
Linearly Independent Set is Contained in some Basis/Finite Dimensional Case
Let $E$ be a vector space of $n$ dimensions. Let $H$ be a linearly independent subset of $E$. There exists a basis $B$ for $E$ such that $H \subseteq B$.
By hypothesis there is a basis $B$ of $E$ with $n$ elements. Then $H \cup B$ is a generator for $E$. So by Vector Space has Basis Between Linearly Independent Set and Finite Spanning Set there exists a basis $C$ of $E$ such that $H \subseteq C \subseteq H \cup B$. {{Qed}}
Let $E$ be a [[Definition:Vector Space|vector space]] of $n$ [[Definition:Dimension of Vector Space|dimensions]]. Let $H$ be a [[Definition:Linearly Independent Set|linearly independent subset]] of $E$. There exists a [[Definition:Basis of Vector Space|basis]] $B$ for $E$ such that $H \subseteq B$.
[[Definition:By Hypothesis|By hypothesis]] there is a [[Definition:Basis of Vector Space|basis]] $B$ of $E$ with $n$ [[Definition:Element|elements]]. Then $H \cup B$ is a [[Definition:Generator of Module|generator]] for $E$. So by [[Vector Space has Basis Between Linearly Independent Set and Finite Spanning Set]] the...
Linearly Independent Set is Contained in some Basis/Finite Dimensional Case/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Linearly_Independent_Set_is_Contained_in_some_Basis/Finite_Dimensional_Case
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Linearly_Independent_Set_is_Contained_in_some_Basis/Finite_Dimensional_Case/Proof_1
[ "Linearly Independent Set is Contained in some Basis" ]
[ "Definition:Vector Space", "Definition:Dimension of Vector Space", "Definition:Linearly Independent/Set", "Definition:Basis of Vector Space" ]
[ "Definition:By Hypothesis", "Definition:Basis of Vector Space", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Generator of Module", "Vector Space has Basis Between Linearly Independent Set and Finite Spanning Set", "Definition:Basis of Vector Space" ]
proofwiki-20420
Linearly Independent Set is Contained in some Basis/Finite Dimensional Case
Let $E$ be a vector space of $n$ dimensions. Let $H$ be a linearly independent subset of $E$. There exists a basis $B$ for $E$ such that $H \subseteq B$.
Let $H = \set {\xi_1, \xi_2, \ldots, \xi_r}$. Consider the basis $B = \set {\alpha_1, \alpha_2, \ldots, \alpha_n}$ of $E$. Consider the set $G = H \cup B = \set {\xi_1, \xi_2, \ldots, \xi_r, \alpha_1, \alpha_2, \ldots, \alpha_n}$. We have that $G$ is a generator of $E$. As $B$ is a basis, it follows that each of $H$ is...
Let $E$ be a [[Definition:Vector Space|vector space]] of $n$ [[Definition:Dimension of Vector Space|dimensions]]. Let $H$ be a [[Definition:Linearly Independent Set|linearly independent subset]] of $E$. There exists a [[Definition:Basis of Vector Space|basis]] $B$ for $E$ such that $H \subseteq B$.
Let $H = \set {\xi_1, \xi_2, \ldots, \xi_r}$. Consider the [[Definition:Basis of Vector Space|basis]] $B = \set {\alpha_1, \alpha_2, \ldots, \alpha_n}$ of $E$. Consider the [[Definition:Set|set]] $G = H \cup B = \set {\xi_1, \xi_2, \ldots, \xi_r, \alpha_1, \alpha_2, \ldots, \alpha_n}$. We have that $G$ is a [[Defini...
Linearly Independent Set is Contained in some Basis/Finite Dimensional Case/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Linearly_Independent_Set_is_Contained_in_some_Basis/Finite_Dimensional_Case
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Linearly_Independent_Set_is_Contained_in_some_Basis/Finite_Dimensional_Case/Proof_2
[ "Linearly Independent Set is Contained in some Basis" ]
[ "Definition:Vector Space", "Definition:Dimension of Vector Space", "Definition:Linearly Independent/Set", "Definition:Basis of Vector Space" ]
[ "Definition:Basis of Vector Space", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Generator of Vector Space", "Definition:Basis of Vector Space", "Definition:Linear Combination", "Definition:Linearly Dependent/Set", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Linear Combination", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Set", "...
proofwiki-20421
Generator of Vector Space Contains Basis/Infinite Dimensional Case
Let $K$ be a field. Let $X$ be a vector space over $K$. Let $G$ be a generator of $X$. Then: :$G$ contains a basis for $X$.
If $X = \set { {\mathbf 0}_X}$, then we must have $G \subseteq \set { {\mathbf 0}_X}$, while the only basis for $X$ is $\O$. So in this case, we have the claim immediately. Now take $X \ne \set { {\mathbf 0}_X}$. Let: :$\SS = \set {L \subseteq G : L \text { is linearly independent} }$ Since $G$ generates $X$, it con...
Let $K$ be a [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]]. Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Vector Space|vector space]] over $K$. Let $G$ be a [[Definition:Generator of Module|generator]] of $X$. Then: :$G$ contains a [[Definition:Basis of Vector Space|basis]] for $X$.
If $X = \set { {\mathbf 0}_X}$, then we must have $G \subseteq \set { {\mathbf 0}_X}$, while the only [[Definition:Basis of Vector Space|basis]] for $X$ is $\O$. So in this case, we have the claim immediately. Now take $X \ne \set { {\mathbf 0}_X}$. Let: :$\SS = \set {L \subseteq G : L \text { is linearly indepe...
Generator of Vector Space Contains Basis/Infinite Dimensional Case
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Generator_of_Vector_Space_Contains_Basis/Infinite_Dimensional_Case
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Generator_of_Vector_Space_Contains_Basis/Infinite_Dimensional_Case
[ "Generator of Vector Space Contains Basis" ]
[ "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Vector Space", "Definition:Generator of Module", "Definition:Basis of Vector Space" ]
[ "Definition:Basis of Vector Space", "Definition:Generator of Module", "Zorn's Lemma", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Chain (Order Theory)", "Definition:Upper Bound of Set", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Chain (Order Theory)", "Definition:Chain (Order Theory)", "Definition:Linear...
proofwiki-20422
Vector not contained in Linear Span of Linearly Independent Set is Linearly Independent of Set
Let $K$ be a field. Let $X$ be a vector space over $K$. Let $L$ be a linearly independent set of $X$ such that: :$U = \map \span L \ne X$ Let: :$x \in X \setminus U$ Then $L \cup \set x$ is linearly independent.
Take $x_1, \ldots, x_n \in L$ and take $\alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_n, \alpha_{n + 1} \in K$ such that: :$\ds \alpha_{n + 1} x + \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \alpha_i x_i = 0$ If $\alpha_{n + 1} = 0$, then we have: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \alpha_i x_i = 0$ and so $\alpha_1 = \alpha_2 = \ldots = \alpha_n = 0$ from the lin...
Let $K$ be a [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]]. Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Vector Space|vector space]] over $K$. Let $L$ be a [[Definition:Linearly Independent Set|linearly independent set]] of $X$ such that: :$U = \map \span L \ne X$ Let: :$x \in X \setminus U$ Then $L \cup \set x$ is [[Definition...
Take $x_1, \ldots, x_n \in L$ and take $\alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_n, \alpha_{n + 1} \in K$ such that: :$\ds \alpha_{n + 1} x + \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \alpha_i x_i = 0$ If $\alpha_{n + 1} = 0$, then we have: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \alpha_i x_i = 0$ and so $\alpha_1 = \alpha_2 = \ldots = \alpha_n = 0$ from the...
Vector not contained in Linear Span of Linearly Independent Set is Linearly Independent of Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Vector_not_contained_in_Linear_Span_of_Linearly_Independent_Set_is_Linearly_Independent_of_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Vector_not_contained_in_Linear_Span_of_Linearly_Independent_Set_is_Linearly_Independent_of_Set
[ "Linear Independence" ]
[ "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Vector Space", "Definition:Linearly Independent/Set", "Definition:Linearly Independent/Set" ]
[ "Definition:Linearly Independent/Set", "Linear Span is Linear Subspace", "Definition:Linearly Independent/Set", "Category:Linear Independence" ]
proofwiki-20423
Dimension of Image of Vector Space under Linear Transformation is Bounded Above by Dimension of Vector Space
Let $K$ be a field. Let $X$ be a vector space over $K$. Let $T : X \to Y$ be a linear transformation. Then: :$\dim T \sqbrk X \le \dim X$
From Vector Space has Basis, there exists a basis $\BB$ for $X$. By Image of Generating Set of Vector Space under Linear Transformation is Generating Set of Image, $T \sqbrk \BB$ is a generator for $T \sqbrk X$. From Generator of Vector Space Contains Basis, there exists a basis $\BB'$ for $T \sqbrk X$ such that $\BB' ...
Let $K$ be a [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]]. Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Vector Space|vector space]] over $K$. Let $T : X \to Y$ be a [[Definition:Linear Transformation|linear transformation]]. Then: :$\dim T \sqbrk X \le \dim X$
From [[Vector Space has Basis]], there exists a [[Definition:Basis of Vector Space|basis]] $\BB$ for $X$. By [[Image of Generating Set of Vector Space under Linear Transformation is Generating Set of Image]], $T \sqbrk \BB$ is a [[Definition:Generator of Module|generator]] for $T \sqbrk X$. From [[Generator of Vector...
Dimension of Image of Vector Space under Linear Transformation is Bounded Above by Dimension of Vector Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Dimension_of_Image_of_Vector_Space_under_Linear_Transformation_is_Bounded_Above_by_Dimension_of_Vector_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Dimension_of_Image_of_Vector_Space_under_Linear_Transformation_is_Bounded_Above_by_Dimension_of_Vector_Space
[ "Dimension of Image of Vector Space under Linear Transformation is Bounded Above by Dimension of Vector Space", "Linear Transformations" ]
[ "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Vector Space", "Definition:Linear Transformation" ]
[ "Vector Space has Basis", "Definition:Basis of Vector Space", "Image of Generating Set of Vector Space under Linear Transformation is Generating Set of Image", "Definition:Generator of Module", "Generator of Vector Space Contains Basis", "Definition:Basis of Vector Space", "Cardinality of Image of Mappi...
proofwiki-20424
Image of Generating Set of Vector Space under Linear Transformation is Generating Set of Image
Let $K$ be a field. Let $X$ be a vector space over $K$. Let $T : X \to Y$ be a linear transformation. Let $G$ be a generating set for $X$. Then $T \sqbrk G$ be a generating set for $T \sqbrk X$.
Let $y \in T \sqbrk X$. Then there exists $x \in X$ such that $y = T x$. Since $G$ generates $X$, there exists $n \in \N$, $x_1, \ldots, x_n \in G$ and $\alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_n \in K$ such that: :$\ds x = \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n \alpha_i x_i$ Then from the linearity of $T$ we have: :$\ds y = T x = \sum_{i \mathop ...
Let $K$ be a [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]]. Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Vector Space|vector space]] over $K$. Let $T : X \to Y$ be a [[Definition:Linear Transformation|linear transformation]]. Let $G$ be a [[Definition:Generator of Module|generating set]] for $X$. Then $T \sqbrk G$ be a [[Definitio...
Let $y \in T \sqbrk X$. Then there exists $x \in X$ such that $y = T x$. Since $G$ [[Definition:Generator of Module|generates]] $X$, there exists $n \in \N$, $x_1, \ldots, x_n \in G$ and $\alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_n \in K$ such that: :$\ds x = \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n \alpha_i x_i$ Then from the [[Definition:Linear ...
Image of Generating Set of Vector Space under Linear Transformation is Generating Set of Image
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Image_of_Generating_Set_of_Vector_Space_under_Linear_Transformation_is_Generating_Set_of_Image
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Image_of_Generating_Set_of_Vector_Space_under_Linear_Transformation_is_Generating_Set_of_Image
[ "Linear Transformations" ]
[ "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Vector Space", "Definition:Linear Transformation", "Definition:Generator of Module", "Definition:Generator of Module" ]
[ "Definition:Generator of Module", "Definition:Linear Transformation", "Definition:Generator of Module", "Category:Linear Transformations" ]
proofwiki-20425
Linear Functional on Vector Space is Zero or Surjective
Let $K$ be a field. Let $X$ be a vector space over $K$. Let $f : X \to K$ be a linear functional. Then either: :$\map f x = 0$ for each $x \in X$ or: :$f$ is surjective.
Suppose that $\map f {x_0} \ne 0$ for $x_0 \in X$. Take $c \in K$. Then we have, from linearity: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map f {c \paren {\map f {x_0} }^{-1} x_0} | r = c \paren {\map f {x_0} }^{-1} \map f {x_0} }} {{eqn | r = c }} {{end-eqn}} Since $c \in K$ was arbitrary, we have that $f$ is surjective. {{qed}...
Let $K$ be a [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]]. Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Vector Space|vector space]] over $K$. Let $f : X \to K$ be a [[Definition:Linear Functional|linear functional]]. Then either: :$\map f x = 0$ for each $x \in X$ or: :$f$ is [[Definition:Surjective Mapping|surjective]].
Suppose that $\map f {x_0} \ne 0$ for $x_0 \in X$. Take $c \in K$. Then we have, from [[Definition:Linear Functional|linearity]]: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map f {c \paren {\map f {x_0} }^{-1} x_0} | r = c \paren {\map f {x_0} }^{-1} \map f {x_0} }} {{eqn | r = c }} {{end-eqn}} Since $c \in K$ was arbitrary, w...
Linear Functional on Vector Space is Zero or Surjective
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Linear_Functional_on_Vector_Space_is_Zero_or_Surjective
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Linear_Functional_on_Vector_Space_is_Zero_or_Surjective
[ "Linear Functionals" ]
[ "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Vector Space", "Definition:Linear Functional", "Definition:Surjection" ]
[ "Definition:Linear Functional", "Definition:Surjection", "Category:Linear Functionals" ]
proofwiki-20426
Continuity of Linear Functionals in Weak Topology Induced by Pair of Vector Spaces with Bilinear Mapping
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ and $X'$ be vector spaces over $\GF$. Let $\innerprod \cdot \cdot : X \times X' \to \GF$ be a bilinear mapping. For each $x' \in X'$, define $f_{x'} : X \to \GF$ by: :$\map {f_{x'} } x = \innerprod x {x'}$ for each $x \in X$. Let: :$F = \set {f_{x'} : x' \in X'}$ Let $\map \sigma {...
=== Sufficient Condition === From the definition of the weak topology, $\map \sigma {X, X'}$ is the coarsest topology making all $g \in F$ continuous. So if $g \in F$ then $g$ is $\map \sigma {X, X'}$-continuous. {{qed|lemma}}
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ and $X'$ be [[Definition:Vector Space|vector spaces]] over $\GF$. Let $\innerprod \cdot \cdot : X \times X' \to \GF$ be a [[Definition:Bilinear Mapping|bilinear mapping]]. For each $x' \in X'$, define $f_{x'} : X \to \GF$ by: :$\map {f_{x'} } x = \innerprod x {x'}$ for each $x \...
=== Sufficient Condition === From the definition of the [[Definition:Weak Topology Induced by Dual System|weak topology]], $\map \sigma {X, X'}$ is the [[Definition:Coarser Topology|coarsest topology]] making all $g \in F$ [[Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)|continuous]]. So if $g \in F$ then $g$ is [[Definiti...
Continuity of Linear Functionals in Weak Topology Induced by Pair of Vector Spaces with Bilinear Mapping
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuity_of_Linear_Functionals_in_Weak_Topology_Induced_by_Pair_of_Vector_Spaces_with_Bilinear_Mapping
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuity_of_Linear_Functionals_in_Weak_Topology_Induced_by_Pair_of_Vector_Spaces_with_Bilinear_Mapping
[ "Initial Topology", "Dual Systems" ]
[ "Definition:Vector Space", "Definition:Bilinear Mapping", "Definition:Initial Topology", "Definition:Linear Functional", "Definition:Continuous Mapping" ]
[ "Definition:Weak Topology Induced by Dual System", "Definition:Coarser Topology", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)" ]
proofwiki-20427
Frink's Metrization Theorem
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. Then: :$T$ is metrizable {{iff}}: :for all $s \in S$ there exists a countable neighborhood basis, denoted $\set {U_{s, n} : n \in \N}$, such that: ::$(1): \quad \forall s \in S, n \in \N : U_{s, n + 1} \subseteq U_{s, n}$ ::$(2): \quad \forall s \in S, n \in \N : \exi...
{{proof wanted}} {{Namedfor|Aline Huke Frink|cat = Frink}}
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Then: :$T$ is [[Definition:Metrizable Space|metrizable]] {{iff}}: :for all $s \in S$ there exists a [[Definition:Countable Set|countable]] [[Definition:Neighborhood Basis|neighborhood basis]], denoted $\set {U_{s, n} : n \in \N}$, su...
{{proof wanted}} {{Namedfor|Aline Huke Frink|cat = Frink}}
Frink's Metrization Theorem
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Frink's_Metrization_Theorem
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Frink's_Metrization_Theorem
[ "Metrization Theorems", "Neighborhood Bases", "Metrizable Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Metrizable Space", "Definition:Countable Set", "Definition:Neighborhood Basis" ]
[]
proofwiki-20428
Linear Functional on Complex Vector Space is Uniquely Determined by Real Part
Let $X$ be a vector space over $\C$. Let $f : X \to \C$ be a linear functional. Define a function $g : X \to \R$: :$\map g x = \map \Re {\map f x}$ for each $x \in X$. Then: :$\map f x = \map g x - i \map g {i x}$ for each $x \in X$.
For brevity, define a function $h : X \to \R$ by: :$\map h x = \map \Im {\map f x}$ for each $x \in X$. Note that: :$\map f x = \map \Re {\map f x} + i \map \Im {\map f x} = \map g x + i \map h x$ so that: :$\map f {i x} = \map g {i x} + i \map h {i x}$ for each $x \in X$. On the other hand, by the linearity of $f$,...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Vector Space|vector space]] over $\C$. Let $f : X \to \C$ be a [[Definition:Linear Functional|linear functional]]. Define a [[Definition:Function|function]] $g : X \to \R$: :$\map g x = \map \Re {\map f x}$ for each $x \in X$. Then: :$\map f x = \map g x - i \map g {i x}$ for each $...
For brevity, define a [[Definition:Function|function]] $h : X \to \R$ by: :$\map h x = \map \Im {\map f x}$ for each $x \in X$. Note that: :$\map f x = \map \Re {\map f x} + i \map \Im {\map f x} = \map g x + i \map h x$ so that: :$\map f {i x} = \map g {i x} + i \map h {i x}$ for each $x \in X$. On the othe...
Linear Functional on Complex Vector Space is Uniquely Determined by Real Part
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Linear_Functional_on_Complex_Vector_Space_is_Uniquely_Determined_by_Real_Part
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Linear_Functional_on_Complex_Vector_Space_is_Uniquely_Determined_by_Real_Part
[ "Linear Functionals" ]
[ "Definition:Vector Space", "Definition:Linear Functional", "Definition:Function" ]
[ "Definition:Function", "Definition:Linear Functional", "Definition:Complex Number/Real Part", "Category:Linear Functionals" ]
proofwiki-20429
Regular Second-Countable Space is Homeomorphic to Subspace of Hilbert Cube/Lemma 1
:$\AA$ is countable
We have: :$\AA \subseteq \BB \times \BB$ where $\BB \times \BB$ is the Cartesian product of $\BB$ with itself. From Cartesian Product of Countable Sets is Countable: :$\BB \times \BB$ is countable From Subset of Countable Set is Countable: :$\AA$ is countable {{qed}} Category:Regular Second-Countable Space is Homeomorp...
:$\AA$ is [[Definition:Countable Set|countable]]
We have: :$\AA \subseteq \BB \times \BB$ where $\BB \times \BB$ is the [[Definition:Cartesian Product|Cartesian product]] of $\BB$ with itself. From [[Cartesian Product of Countable Sets is Countable]]: :$\BB \times \BB$ is [[Definition:Countable Set|countable]] From [[Subset of Countable Set is Countable]]: :$\AA$ i...
Regular Second-Countable Space is Homeomorphic to Subspace of Hilbert Cube/Lemma 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Regular_Second-Countable_Space_is_Homeomorphic_to_Subspace_of_Hilbert_Cube/Lemma_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Regular_Second-Countable_Space_is_Homeomorphic_to_Subspace_of_Hilbert_Cube/Lemma_1
[ "Regular Second-Countable Space is Homeomorphic to Subspace of Hilbert Cube" ]
[ "Definition:Countable Set" ]
[ "Definition:Cartesian Product", "Cartesian Product of Countable Sets is Countable", "Definition:Countable Set", "Subset of Countable Set is Countable", "Definition:Countable Set", "Category:Regular Second-Countable Space is Homeomorphic to Subspace of Hilbert Cube" ]
proofwiki-20430
Regular Lindelöf Space is Normal
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a regular Lindelöf topological space. Then $T$ is a normal space.
{{Recall|Normal Space|normal space|index = 1}} {{Definition:Normal Space/Definition 1}} Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a regular Lindelöf space. {{Recall|Regular Space|regular space|index = 2}} {{Definition:Regular Space/Definition 2}} From $T_3$ Lindelöf Space is $T_4$: :$T$ is a $T_4$ space By definition, $T$ is a no...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Regular Space|regular]] [[Definition:Lindelöf Space|Lindelöf]] [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Then $T$ is a [[Definition:Normal Space|normal space]].
{{Recall|Normal Space|normal space|index = 1}} {{Definition:Normal Space/Definition 1}} Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Regular Space|regular]] [[Definition:Lindelöf Space|Lindelöf space]]. {{Recall|Regular Space|regular space|index = 2}} {{Definition:Regular Space/Definition 2}} From [[T3 Lindelöf Spa...
Regular Lindelöf Space is Normal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Regular_Lindelöf_Space_is_Normal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Regular_Lindelöf_Space_is_Normal
[ "Regular Spaces", "Lindelöf Spaces", "Normal Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Regular Space", "Definition:Lindelöf Space", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Normal Space" ]
[ "Definition:Regular Space", "Definition:Lindelöf Space", "T3 Lindelöf Space is T4", "Definition:T4 Space", "Definition:Normal Space", "Category:Regular Spaces", "Category:Lindelöf Spaces", "Category:Normal Spaces" ]
proofwiki-20431
Regular Second-Countable Space is Homeomorphic to Subspace of Hilbert Cube
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space which is regular and second-countable. Then $T$ is homeomorphic to a subspace of the Hilbert cube.
From Second-Countable Space is Lindelöf: :$T$ is a Lindelöf space From Regular Lindelöf Space is Normal: :$T$ is a normal space By definition of second-countable: :there exists a countable basis $\BB$ for $\tau$ Let: :$\AA = \set {\tuple {U, V} : U, V \in \BB : U^- \subseteq V}$ where $U^-$ denotes the closure of $U$ ...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]] which is [[Definition:Regular Space|regular]] and [[Definition:Second-Countable Space|second-countable]]. Then $T$ is [[Definition:Homeomorphism|homeomorphic]] to a [[Definition:Topological Subspace|subspace]] of the [[Definition:Hilbe...
From [[Second-Countable Space is Lindelöf]]: :$T$ is a [[Definition:Lindelöf Space|Lindelöf space]] From [[Regular Lindelöf Space is Normal]]: :$T$ is a [[Definition:Normal Space|normal space]] By definition of [[Definition:Second-Countable Space|second-countable]]: :there exists a [[Definition:Countable Set|counta...
Regular Second-Countable Space is Homeomorphic to Subspace of Hilbert Cube
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Regular_Second-Countable_Space_is_Homeomorphic_to_Subspace_of_Hilbert_Cube
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Regular_Second-Countable_Space_is_Homeomorphic_to_Subspace_of_Hilbert_Cube
[ "Regular Spaces", "Second-Countable Spaces", "Hilbert Cube", "Regular Second-Countable Space is Homeomorphic to Subspace of Hilbert Cube" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Regular Space", "Definition:Second-Countable Space", "Definition:Homeomorphism", "Definition:Topological Subspace", "Definition:Hilbert Cube" ]
[ "Second-Countable Space is Lindelöf", "Definition:Lindelöf Space", "Regular Lindelöf Space is Normal", "Definition:Normal Space", "Definition:Second-Countable Space", "Definition:Countable Set", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis", "Definition:Closure (Topology)", "Definition:Countable Set"...
proofwiki-20432
Equivalence Classes of Diagonal Relation
Let $S$ be a set. Let $\Delta_S$ denote the diagonal relation on $S$. The set $\EE_S$ of equivalence classes of $S$ can be expressed as: :$\EE_S = \set {\set x: x \in S}$ That is, it is the set of all singletons of $S$.
Let $x \in S$. Then by definition of the diagonal relation: :$y \mathrel {\Delta_S} x \iff y = x$ Hence: :$y \in \eqclass x {\Delta_S} \iff y = x$ That is: :$\eqclass x {\Delta_S} = \set x$ Hence the result. {{qed}} Category:Diagonal Relation Category:Examples of Equivalence Classes 9hc4lfljm0a9bjr4xhjdjcp465t6x07
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. Let $\Delta_S$ denote the [[Definition:Diagonal Relation|diagonal relation]] on $S$. The [[Definition:Set|set]] $\EE_S$ of [[Definition:Equivalence Class|equivalence classes]] of $S$ can be expressed as: :$\EE_S = \set {\set x: x \in S}$ That is, it is the [[Definition:Set|set]]...
Let $x \in S$. Then by definition of the [[Definition:Diagonal Relation|diagonal relation]]: :$y \mathrel {\Delta_S} x \iff y = x$ Hence: :$y \in \eqclass x {\Delta_S} \iff y = x$ That is: :$\eqclass x {\Delta_S} = \set x$ Hence the result. {{qed}} [[Category:Diagonal Relation]] [[Category:Examples of Equivalence ...
Equivalence Classes of Diagonal Relation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_Classes_of_Diagonal_Relation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_Classes_of_Diagonal_Relation
[ "Diagonal Relation", "Examples of Equivalence Classes" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Diagonal Relation", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Equivalence Class", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Singleton" ]
[ "Definition:Diagonal Relation", "Category:Diagonal Relation", "Category:Examples of Equivalence Classes" ]
proofwiki-20433
Set of Ordered Pairs of Integers is Countable Infinite
The set of all ordered pairs of integers $\Z$ is countably infinite.
The set of all ordered pairs of a set $S$ is by definition the Cartesian product $S \times S$. In this context we are determining the cardinality of $\Z \times \Z$. From Integers are Countably Infinite, we have that $\Z$ is a countably infinite set. The result then follows from Cartesian Product of Countable Sets is Co...
The [[Definition:Set|set]] of all [[Definition:Ordered Pair|ordered pairs]] of [[Definition:Integer|integers]] $\Z$ is [[Definition:Countably Infinite Set|countably infinite]].
The [[Definition:Set|set]] of all [[Definition:Ordered Pair|ordered pairs]] of a [[Definition:Set|set]] $S$ is by definition the [[Definition:Cartesian Product|Cartesian product]] $S \times S$. In this context we are determining the [[Definition:Cardinality|cardinality]] of $\Z \times \Z$. From [[Integers are Countab...
Set of Ordered Pairs of Integers is Countable Infinite
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_of_Ordered_Pairs_of_Integers_is_Countable_Infinite
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_of_Ordered_Pairs_of_Integers_is_Countable_Infinite
[ "Countable Sets", "Integers" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Ordered Pair", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Countably Infinite/Set" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Ordered Pair", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Cartesian Product", "Definition:Cardinality", "Integers are Countably Infinite", "Definition:Countably Infinite/Set", "Cartesian Product of Countable Sets is Countable" ]
proofwiki-20434
Union of Relation with Inverse is Symmetric Relation
Let $\RR$ be a relation on a set $S$. Let $\RR^{-1}$ denote the inverse of $\RR$. Then $\RR \cup \RR^{-1}$, the union of $\RR$ with $\RR^{-1}$, is symmetric.
Let $\tuple {a, b} \in \RR \cup \RR^{-1}$. By definition of union, either: :$\tuple {a, b} \in \RR$ or: :$\tuple {a, b} \in \RR^{-1}$ ;Case 1 If $\tuple {a, b} \in \RR$, then by definition of inverse relation: :$\tuple {b, a} \in \RR^{-1}$ But from Set is Subset of Union: :$\tuple {b, a} \in \RR \cup \RR^{-1}$ {{qed|le...
Let $\RR$ be a [[Definition:Relation|relation]] on a [[Definition:Set|set]] $S$. Let $\RR^{-1}$ denote the [[Definition:Inverse Relation|inverse]] of $\RR$. Then $\RR \cup \RR^{-1}$, the [[Definition:Set Union|union]] of $\RR$ with $\RR^{-1}$, is [[Definition:Symmetric Relation|symmetric]].
Let $\tuple {a, b} \in \RR \cup \RR^{-1}$. By definition of [[Definition:Set Union|union]], either: :$\tuple {a, b} \in \RR$ or: :$\tuple {a, b} \in \RR^{-1}$ ;Case 1 If $\tuple {a, b} \in \RR$, then by definition of [[Definition:Inverse Relation|inverse relation]]: :$\tuple {b, a} \in \RR^{-1}$ But from [[Set ...
Union of Relation with Inverse is Symmetric Relation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_of_Relation_with_Inverse_is_Symmetric_Relation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_of_Relation_with_Inverse_is_Symmetric_Relation
[ "Set Union", "Inverse Relations", "Symmetric Relations" ]
[ "Definition:Relation", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Inverse Relation", "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Symmetric Relation" ]
[ "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Inverse Relation", "Set is Subset of Union", "Definition:Inverse Relation", "Inverse of Inverse Relation", "Set is Subset of Union", "Proof by Cases", "Definition:Symmetric Relation", "Category:Set Union", "Category:Inverse Relations", "Category:Symmetric Rela...
proofwiki-20435
Equivalence of Definitions of Symmetric Closure
{{TFAE|def = Symmetric Closure}} Let $\RR$ be a relation on a set $S$.
First we note that from Union of Relation with Inverse is Symmetric Relation, $\RR \cup \RR^{-1}$ is a symmetric relation.
{{TFAE|def = Symmetric Closure}} Let $\RR$ be a [[Definition:Relation|relation]] on a [[Definition:Set|set]] $S$.
First we note that from [[Union of Relation with Inverse is Symmetric Relation]], $\RR \cup \RR^{-1}$ is a [[Definition:Symmetric Relation|symmetric relation]].
Equivalence of Definitions of Symmetric Closure
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Symmetric_Closure
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Symmetric_Closure
[ "Symmetric Closures" ]
[ "Definition:Relation", "Definition:Set" ]
[ "Union of Relation with Inverse is Symmetric Relation", "Definition:Symmetric Relation", "Definition:Symmetric Relation", "Definition:Symmetric Relation", "Definition:Symmetric Relation", "Definition:Symmetric Relation", "Definition:Symmetric Relation", "Definition:Symmetric Relation" ]
proofwiki-20436
Real Part of Linear Functional is Linear Functional
Let $X$ be a vector space over $\C$. Let $f : X \to \C$ be a linear functional. Define $g : X \to \R$ by: :$\map g x = \map \Re {\map f x}$ for each $x \in X$. Then $f$ is $\R$-linear.
Let $x, y \in X$ and $\lambda, \mu \in \R$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map g {\lambda x + \mu y} | r = \map \Re {\map f {\lambda x + \mu y} } }} {{eqn | r = \frac 1 2 \paren {\map f {\lambda x + \mu y} + \overline {\map f {\lambda x + \mu y} } } | c = Sum of Complex Number with Conjugate }} {{eqn | r = \frac...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Vector Space|vector space]] over $\C$. Let $f : X \to \C$ be a [[Definition:Linear Functional|linear functional]]. Define $g : X \to \R$ by: :$\map g x = \map \Re {\map f x}$ for each $x \in X$. Then $f$ is [[Definition:Linear Functional|$\R$-linear]].
Let $x, y \in X$ and $\lambda, \mu \in \R$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map g {\lambda x + \mu y} | r = \map \Re {\map f {\lambda x + \mu y} } }} {{eqn | r = \frac 1 2 \paren {\map f {\lambda x + \mu y} + \overline {\map f {\lambda x + \mu y} } } | c = [[Sum of Complex Number with Conjugate]] }} {{eqn | r =...
Real Part of Linear Functional is Linear Functional
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Part_of_Linear_Functional_is_Linear_Functional
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Part_of_Linear_Functional_is_Linear_Functional
[ "Linear Functionals" ]
[ "Definition:Vector Space", "Definition:Linear Functional", "Definition:Linear Functional" ]
[ "Sum of Complex Number with Conjugate", "Sum of Complex Conjugates", "Definition:Linear Functional", "Product of Complex Conjugates", "Category:Linear Functionals" ]
proofwiki-20437
Imaginary Part of Linear Functional is Linear Functional
Let $X$ be a vector space over $\C$. Let $f : X \to \C$ be a linear functional. Define $h : X \to \R$ by: :$\map h x = \map \Im {\map f x}$ for each $x \in X$. Then $f$ is $\R$-linear.
Let $x, y \in X$ and $\lambda, \mu \in \R$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map h {\lambda x + \mu y} | r = \map \Re {\map f {\lambda x + \mu y} } }} {{eqn | r = \frac 1 {2 i} \paren {\map f {\lambda x + \mu y} - \overline {\map f {\lambda x + \mu y} } } | c = Difference of Complex Number with Conjugate }} {{eqn ...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Vector Space|vector space]] over $\C$. Let $f : X \to \C$ be a [[Definition:Linear Functional|linear functional]]. Define $h : X \to \R$ by: :$\map h x = \map \Im {\map f x}$ for each $x \in X$. Then $f$ is [[Definition:Linear Functional|$\R$-linear]].
Let $x, y \in X$ and $\lambda, \mu \in \R$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map h {\lambda x + \mu y} | r = \map \Re {\map f {\lambda x + \mu y} } }} {{eqn | r = \frac 1 {2 i} \paren {\map f {\lambda x + \mu y} - \overline {\map f {\lambda x + \mu y} } } | c = [[Difference of Complex Number with Conjugate]] }} ...
Imaginary Part of Linear Functional is Linear Functional
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Imaginary_Part_of_Linear_Functional_is_Linear_Functional
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Imaginary_Part_of_Linear_Functional_is_Linear_Functional
[ "Linear Functionals" ]
[ "Definition:Vector Space", "Definition:Linear Functional", "Definition:Linear Functional" ]
[ "Difference of Complex Number with Conjugate", "Sum of Complex Conjugates", "Definition:Linear Functional", "Product of Complex Conjugates", "Category:Linear Functionals" ]
proofwiki-20438
Hahn-Banach Theorem for Continuous Linear Functional on Locally Convex Space
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \PP}$ be a locally convex space over $\GF$ with its standard topology. Let $X_0$ be a linear subspace of $X$. Let $f_0 : X_0 \to \GF$ be a continuous linear functional. Then there exists a continuous linear functional $f : X \to \GF$ such that $f$ extends $f_0$.
By Normed Vector Space is Locally Convex Space and Norm on Vector Space is Seminorm, we can view the normed vector space $\struct {\GF, \cmod {\, \cdot \,} }$ as the locally convex space $\struct {\GF, \set {\cmod {\, \cdot \,} } }$. From Characterization of Continuous Linear Transformations between Locally Convex Spac...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \PP}$ be a [[Definition:Locally Convex Space|locally convex space]] over $\GF$ with its [[Definition:Locally Convex Space/Standard Topology|standard topology]]. Let $X_0$ be a [[Definition:Linear Subspace|linear subspace]] of $X$. Let $f_0 : X_0 \to \GF$ be a [[Definit...
By [[Normed Vector Space is Locally Convex Space]] and [[Norm on Vector Space is Seminorm]], we can view the [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector space]] $\struct {\GF, \cmod {\, \cdot \,} }$ as the [[Definition:Locally Convex Space|locally convex space]] $\struct {\GF, \set {\cmod {\, \cdot \,} } }$. From [...
Hahn-Banach Theorem for Continuous Linear Functional on Locally Convex Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hahn-Banach_Theorem_for_Continuous_Linear_Functional_on_Locally_Convex_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hahn-Banach_Theorem_for_Continuous_Linear_Functional_on_Locally_Convex_Space
[ "Functional Analysis", "Locally Convex Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Locally Convex Space", "Definition:Locally Convex Space/Standard Topology", "Definition:Linear Subspace", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Linear Functional", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Linear Functional", "Definition:Extension of Mapping...
[ "Normed Vector Space is Locally Convex Space", "Norm on Vector Space is Seminorm", "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Locally Convex Space", "Characterization of Continuous Linear Transformations between Locally Convex Spaces", "Pointwise Maximum of Finite Family of Seminorms is Seminorm", "N...
proofwiki-20439
Non-Negative Scalar Multiple of Seminorm on Vector Space is Seminorm
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a vector space over $\GF$. Let $p$ be a seminorm on $X$. Let $\alpha \in \R_{\ge 0}$. Let $q = \alpha p$. Then $q$ is a seminorm on $X$.
=== {{SeminormAxiom|2}} === Let $x \in X$ and $k \in \GF$. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map q {k x} | r = \alpha \map p {k x} }} {{eqn | r = \alpha \cmod k \map p x | c = {{SeminormAxiom|2}} for $p$ }} {{eqn | r = \cmod k \map q x }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed|lemma}}
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Vector Space|vector space]] over $\GF$. Let $p$ be a [[Definition:Seminorm|seminorm]] on $X$. Let $\alpha \in \R_{\ge 0}$. Let $q = \alpha p$. Then $q$ is a [[Definition:Seminorm|seminorm]] on $X$.
=== {{SeminormAxiom|2}} === Let $x \in X$ and $k \in \GF$. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map q {k x} | r = \alpha \map p {k x} }} {{eqn | r = \alpha \cmod k \map p x | c = {{SeminormAxiom|2}} for $p$ }} {{eqn | r = \cmod k \map q x }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed|lemma}}
Non-Negative Scalar Multiple of Seminorm on Vector Space is Seminorm
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Non-Negative_Scalar_Multiple_of_Seminorm_on_Vector_Space_is_Seminorm
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Non-Negative_Scalar_Multiple_of_Seminorm_on_Vector_Space_is_Seminorm
[ "Seminorms" ]
[ "Definition:Vector Space", "Definition:Seminorm", "Definition:Seminorm" ]
[]
proofwiki-20440
Norm on Vector Space is Seminorm
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a vector space over $\GF$. Let $\norm {\, \cdot \,}$ be a norm on $X$. Then $\norm {\, \cdot \,}$ is a seminorm.
Note that {{NormAxiomVector|2}} and {{NormAxiomVector|3}} are precisely {{SeminormAxiom|2}} and {{SeminormAxiom|3}}. {{qed}} Category:Seminorms Category:Normed Spaces ituqwziuvtw1f7cdjuiayolrsbculmt
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Vector Space|vector space]] over $\GF$. Let $\norm {\, \cdot \,}$ be a [[Definition:Norm on Vector Space|norm]] on $X$. Then $\norm {\, \cdot \,}$ is a [[Definition:Seminorm|seminorm]].
Note that {{NormAxiomVector|2}} and {{NormAxiomVector|3}} are precisely {{SeminormAxiom|2}} and {{SeminormAxiom|3}}. {{qed}} [[Category:Seminorms]] [[Category:Normed Spaces]] ituqwziuvtw1f7cdjuiayolrsbculmt
Norm on Vector Space is Seminorm
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Norm_on_Vector_Space_is_Seminorm
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Norm_on_Vector_Space_is_Seminorm
[ "Seminorms", "Seminorms", "Normed Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Vector Space", "Definition:Norm/Vector Space", "Definition:Seminorm" ]
[ "Category:Seminorms", "Category:Normed Spaces" ]
proofwiki-20441
Positive Scalar Multiple of Norm on Vector Space is Norm
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be a normed vector space over $\GF$. Let $\alpha > 0$ be a real number. Define $\norm {\, \cdot \,}' : X \to \R_{\ge 0}$ by: :$\norm x' = \alpha \norm x$ for each $x \in X$. Then $\norm {\, \cdot \,}'$ is a norm on $X$.
=== {{NormAxiomVector|1|nolink}} === Suppose that $x \in X$ is such that: :$\norm x' = 0$ Then we have: :$\alpha \norm x = 0$ Since $\alpha > 0$, it follows that: :$\norm x = 0$ From {{NormAxiomVector|1}}, we have $x = {\mathbf 0}_X$. {{qed|lemma}}
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be a [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector space]] over $\GF$. Let $\alpha > 0$ be a [[Definition:Real Number|real number]]. Define $\norm {\, \cdot \,}' : X \to \R_{\ge 0}$ by: :$\norm x' = \alpha \norm x$ for each $x \in X$. Then...
=== {{NormAxiomVector|1|nolink}} === Suppose that $x \in X$ is such that: :$\norm x' = 0$ Then we have: :$\alpha \norm x = 0$ Since $\alpha > 0$, it follows that: :$\norm x = 0$ From {{NormAxiomVector|1}}, we have $x = {\mathbf 0}_X$. {{qed|lemma}}
Positive Scalar Multiple of Norm on Vector Space is Norm
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Positive_Scalar_Multiple_of_Norm_on_Vector_Space_is_Norm
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Positive_Scalar_Multiple_of_Norm_on_Vector_Space_is_Norm
[ "Normed Vector Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Norm/Vector Space" ]
[]
proofwiki-20442
Vector Addition on Locally Convex Space is Continuous
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \PP}$ be a locally convex space over $\GF$ equipped with the standard topolgoy. Let $\struct {X \times X, \tau}$ be the Cartesian product $X \times X$ equipped with the product topology. Let $+ : \struct {X \times X, \tau} \to \struct {X, \PP}$ be the vector addition defin...
From the definition of the standard topolgoy, the topology on $\struct {X, \PP}$ has sub-basis: :$\SS = \set {\map {B_p} {x, \epsilon} : p \in \PP, \, \epsilon > 0}$ where we define: :$\map {B_p} {x, \epsilon} = \set {y \in X : \map p {y - x} < \epsilon}$ for each $p \in \PP$ and $\epsilon > 0$. From Continuity Test ...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \PP}$ be a [[Definition:Locally Convex Space|locally convex space]] over $\GF$ equipped with the [[Definition:Locally Convex Space/Standard Topology|standard topolgoy]]. Let $\struct {X \times X, \tau}$ be the [[Definition:Cartesian Product|Cartesian product]] $X \times ...
From the definition of the [[Definition:Locally Convex Space/Standard Topology|standard topolgoy]], the [[Definition:Topology|topology]] on $\struct {X, \PP}$ has [[Definition:Sub-Basis|sub-basis]]: :$\SS = \set {\map {B_p} {x, \epsilon} : p \in \PP, \, \epsilon > 0}$ where we define: :$\map {B_p} {x, \epsilon} = ...
Vector Addition on Locally Convex Space is Continuous
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Vector_Addition_on_Locally_Convex_Space_is_Continuous
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Vector_Addition_on_Locally_Convex_Space_is_Continuous
[ "Locally Convex Spaces", "Vector Addition" ]
[ "Definition:Locally Convex Space", "Definition:Locally Convex Space/Standard Topology", "Definition:Cartesian Product", "Definition:Product Topology", "Definition:Vector Addition/Vector Space", "Definition:Continuous Mapping" ]
[ "Definition:Locally Convex Space/Standard Topology", "Definition:Topology", "Definition:Sub-Basis", "Continuity Test using Sub-Basis", "Union of Subsets is Subset", "Natural Basis of Product Topology/Finite Product", "Definition:Basis (Topology)", "Definition:Topology", "Definition:Set Union", "Ca...
proofwiki-20443
Scalar Multiplication on Locally Convex Space is Continuous
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \PP}$ be a locally convex space over $\GF$ equipped with the standard topolgoy. Let $\struct {\GF \times X, \tau}$ be the Cartesian product $\GF \times X$ equipped with the product topology. Let $\circ : \struct {\GF \times X, \tau} \to \struct {X, \PP}$ be the scalar mult...
From the definition of the standard topology, the topology on $\struct {X, \PP}$ has sub-basis: :$\SS = \set {\map {B_p} {x, \epsilon} : p \in \PP, \, \epsilon > 0}$ where we define: :$\map {B_p} {x, \epsilon} = \set {y \in X : \map p {y - x} < \epsilon}$ for each $p \in \PP$ and $\epsilon > 0$. From Continuity Test ...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \PP}$ be a [[Definition:Locally Convex Space|locally convex space]] over $\GF$ equipped with the [[Definition:Locally Convex Space/Standard Topology|standard topolgoy]]. Let $\struct {\GF \times X, \tau}$ be the [[Definition:Cartesian Product|Cartesian product]] $\GF \ti...
From the definition of the [[Definition:Locally Convex Space/Standard Topology|standard topology]], the [[Definition:Topology|topology]] on $\struct {X, \PP}$ has [[Definition:Sub-Basis|sub-basis]]: :$\SS = \set {\map {B_p} {x, \epsilon} : p \in \PP, \, \epsilon > 0}$ where we define: :$\map {B_p} {x, \epsilon} = ...
Scalar Multiplication on Locally Convex Space is Continuous
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Scalar_Multiplication_on_Locally_Convex_Space_is_Continuous
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Scalar_Multiplication_on_Locally_Convex_Space_is_Continuous
[ "Locally Convex Spaces", "Scalar Multiplication" ]
[ "Definition:Locally Convex Space", "Definition:Locally Convex Space/Standard Topology", "Definition:Cartesian Product", "Definition:Product Topology", "Definition:Scalar Multiplication/Vector Space", "Definition:Continuous Mapping" ]
[ "Definition:Locally Convex Space/Standard Topology", "Definition:Topology", "Definition:Sub-Basis", "Continuity Test using Sub-Basis", "Definition:Open Ball", "Definition:Open Ball/Radius", "Definition:Open Ball/Center", "Union of Subsets is Subset", "Natural Basis of Product Topology/Finite Product...
proofwiki-20444
Locally Convex Space is Topological Vector Space
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \PP}$ be a locally convex space over $\GF$ equipped with the standard topology $\tau$. Then $\struct {X, \tau}$ is a topological vector space.
From Vector Addition on Locally Convex Space is Continuous, vector addition on $X$ is continuous. From Scalar Multiplication on Locally Convex Space is Continuous, scalar multiplication on $X$ is continuous. So $\struct {X, \tau}$ is a topological vector space. {{qed}} Category:Locally Convex Spaces Category:Topologi...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \PP}$ be a [[Definition:Locally Convex Space|locally convex space]] over $\GF$ equipped with the [[Definition:Locally Convex Space/Standard Topology|standard topology]] $\tau$. Then $\struct {X, \tau}$ is a [[Definition:Topological Vector Space|topological vector space...
From [[Vector Addition on Locally Convex Space is Continuous]], [[Definition:Vector Addition on Vector Space|vector addition]] on $X$ is [[Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)|continuous]]. From [[Scalar Multiplication on Locally Convex Space is Continuous]], [[Definition:Scalar Multiplication on Vector Space|sca...
Locally Convex Space is Topological Vector Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Locally_Convex_Space_is_Topological_Vector_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Locally_Convex_Space_is_Topological_Vector_Space
[ "Locally Convex Space is Topological Vector Space", "Locally Convex Spaces", "Topological Vector Spaces", "Locally Convex Space is Topological Vector Space" ]
[ "Definition:Locally Convex Space", "Definition:Locally Convex Space/Standard Topology", "Definition:Topological Vector Space" ]
[ "Vector Addition on Locally Convex Space is Continuous", "Definition:Vector Addition/Vector Space", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Scalar Multiplication on Locally Convex Space is Continuous", "Definition:Scalar Multiplication/Vector Space", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Def...
proofwiki-20445
Existence of Non-Zero Continuous Linear Functional vanishing on Proper Closed Subspace of Locally Convex Space
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \PP}$ be a locally convex space over $\GF$. Let $Y$ be a proper closed linear subspace of $X$. Let $x_0 \in X \setminus Y$. Then there exists a continuous linear functional $f : X \to \GF$ such that: :$\map f y = 0$ for each $y \in Y$ and: :$\map f {x_0} \ne 0$
Let: :$X_0 = \map \span {Y \cup \set x}$ From Linear Span is Linear Subspace, we have: :$X_0$ is a linear subspace of $X$. Note that we can then write any $u \in X_0$ in the form: :$u = y + \alpha x$ for $y \in Y$ and $\alpha \in \mathbb F$. We want to define a map in terms of this representation, so we show that th...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \PP}$ be a [[Definition:Locally Convex Space|locally convex space]] over $\GF$. Let $Y$ be a [[Definition:Proper Subset|proper]] [[Definition:Closed Linear Subspace|closed linear subspace]] of $X$. Let $x_0 \in X \setminus Y$. Then there exists a [[Definition:Continuo...
Let: :$X_0 = \map \span {Y \cup \set x}$ From [[Linear Span is Linear Subspace]], we have: :$X_0$ is a [[Definition:Linear Subspace|linear subspace]] of $X$. Note that we can then write any $u \in X_0$ in the form: :$u = y + \alpha x$ for $y \in Y$ and $\alpha \in \mathbb F$. We want to define a map in terms ...
Existence of Non-Zero Continuous Linear Functional vanishing on Proper Closed Subspace of Locally Convex Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Existence_of_Non-Zero_Continuous_Linear_Functional_vanishing_on_Proper_Closed_Subspace_of_Locally_Convex_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Existence_of_Non-Zero_Continuous_Linear_Functional_vanishing_on_Proper_Closed_Subspace_of_Locally_Convex_Space
[ "Linear Functionals", "Locally Convex Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Locally Convex Space", "Definition:Proper Subset", "Definition:Closed Linear Subspace", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Linear Functional" ]
[ "Linear Span is Linear Subspace", "Definition:Linear Subspace", "Definition:Linear Subspace", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Characterization of Continuous Linear Functionals on Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Hahn-Banach Theorem for Continuous Linear Function...
proofwiki-20446
Equivalence of Definitions of Metrizable Space/Lemma 1
:$d_\phi$ is a metric on $S$.
We note that by definition $d: M \to \R$ is a metric on $M$. Hence $d$ satisfies all the metric space axioms.
:$d_\phi$ is a [[Definition:Metric|metric]] on $S$.
We note that by definition $d: M \to \R$ is a [[Definition:Metric|metric]] on $M$. Hence $d$ satisfies all the [[Axiom:Metric Space Axioms|metric space axioms]].
Equivalence of Definitions of Metrizable Space/Lemma 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Metrizable_Space/Lemma_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Metrizable_Space/Lemma_1
[ "Equivalence of Definitions of Metrizable Space" ]
[ "Definition:Metric Space/Metric" ]
[ "Definition:Metric Space/Metric", "Axiom:Metric Space Axioms", "Definition:Metric Space/Metric" ]
proofwiki-20447
Equivalence of Definitions of Metrizable Space/Lemma 2
:$\forall U \subseteq S : U$ is open in $\struct{S, d_\phi}$ {{iff}} $\phi \sqbrk U$ is open in $\struct{A, d}$
=== Lemma 3 === {{:Equivalence of Definitions of Metrizable Space/Lemma 3}}{{qed|lemma}} Let $U \subseteq S$.
:$\forall U \subseteq S : U$ is [[Definition:Open Set (Metric Space)|open]] in $\struct{S, d_\phi}$ {{iff}} $\phi \sqbrk U$ is [[Definition:Open Set (Metric Space)|open]] in $\struct{A, d}$
=== [[Equivalence of Definitions of Metrizable Space/Lemma 3|Lemma 3]] === {{:Equivalence of Definitions of Metrizable Space/Lemma 3}}{{qed|lemma}} Let $U \subseteq S$.
Equivalence of Definitions of Metrizable Space/Lemma 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Metrizable_Space/Lemma_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Metrizable_Space/Lemma_2
[ "Equivalence of Definitions of Metrizable Space" ]
[ "Definition:Open Set/Metric Space", "Definition:Open Set/Metric Space" ]
[ "Equivalence of Definitions of Metrizable Space/Lemma 3" ]
proofwiki-20448
Equivalence of Definitions of Metrizable Space/Lemma 3
:$\forall s \in S, \epsilon \in \R_{\ge 0} : \phi \sqbrk {\map {B_\epsilon} s} = \map {B_\epsilon} {\map \phi s}$ where: :$(1) \quad \map {B_\epsilon} s$ is the open ball in $\struct{S, d_\phi}$ with center $s$ and radius $\epsilon$ :$(2) \quad \map {B_\epsilon} {\map \phi s}$ is the open ball in $\struct{A, d}$ with c...
Let $s \in S$. Let $\epsilon \in \R_{\ge 0}$. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x \in \map {B_\epsilon} s | o = \leadstoandfrom | r = \map {d_\phi} {s, x} < \epsilon | c = {{Defof|Open Ball}} in $\struct{S, d_\phi}$ }} {{eqn | o = \leadstoandfrom | r = \map d {\map \phi s, \map \phi x} < \epsil...
:$\forall s \in S, \epsilon \in \R_{\ge 0} : \phi \sqbrk {\map {B_\epsilon} s} = \map {B_\epsilon} {\map \phi s}$ where: :$(1) \quad \map {B_\epsilon} s$ is the [[Definition:Open Ball|open ball]] in $\struct{S, d_\phi}$ with [[Definition:Center of Open Ball|center]] $s$ and [[Definition:Radius of Open Ball|radius]] $\e...
Let $s \in S$. Let $\epsilon \in \R_{\ge 0}$. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x \in \map {B_\epsilon} s | o = \leadstoandfrom | r = \map {d_\phi} {s, x} < \epsilon | c = {{Defof|Open Ball}} in $\struct{S, d_\phi}$ }} {{eqn | o = \leadstoandfrom | r = \map d {\map \phi s, \map \phi x} < \ep...
Equivalence of Definitions of Metrizable Space/Lemma 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Metrizable_Space/Lemma_3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Metrizable_Space/Lemma_3
[ "Equivalence of Definitions of Metrizable Space" ]
[ "Definition:Open Ball", "Definition:Open Ball/Center", "Definition:Open Ball/Radius", "Definition:Open Ball", "Definition:Open Ball/Center", "Definition:Open Ball/Radius" ]
[ "Definition:Set Equality", "Definition:Homeomorphism/Topological Spaces", "Definition:Surjection", "Image of Preimage of Subset under Surjection equals Subset", "Category:Equivalence of Definitions of Metrizable Space" ]
proofwiki-20449
Linear Combination of Continuous Functions valued in Topological Vector Space is Continuous
Let $X$ be a topological space. Let $K$ be a topological field. Let $Y$ be a topological vector space over $K$. Let $n \in \N$. Let $f_1, \ldots, f_n : X \to Y$ be continuous functions. Let $\alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_n \in K$. Then: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \alpha_k f_k$ is a continuous function.
We do induction on the number of functions $n$:
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $K$ be a [[Definition:Topological Field|topological field]]. Let $Y$ be a [[Definition:Topological Vector Space|topological vector space]] over $K$. Let $n \in \N$. Let $f_1, \ldots, f_n : X \to Y$ be [[Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)|c...
We do [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]] on the number of functions $n$:
Linear Combination of Continuous Functions valued in Topological Vector Space is Continuous
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Linear_Combination_of_Continuous_Functions_valued_in_Topological_Vector_Space_is_Continuous
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Linear_Combination_of_Continuous_Functions_valued_in_Topological_Vector_Space_is_Continuous
[ "Topological Vector Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Topological Field", "Definition:Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Principle of Mathematical Induction" ]
proofwiki-20450
Cartesian Space of Topological Field is Topological Vector Space
Let $K$ be a topological field. Let $K^n$ be the cartesian $n$-th power of $K$, defining scalar multiplication and vector addition component-wise. Equip $K^n$ with the product topology given by $K$. Then $K^n$ is a topological vector space. {{Refactor|level = medium|extract the following into its own (corollary) page}...
If $K$ is Hausdorff, then from Product Space is $T_2$ iff Factor Spaces are $T_2$ the topology on $K^n$ is Hausdorff. We therefore just need to show that scalar multiplication and vector addition are continuous.
Let $K$ be a [[Definition:Topological Field|topological field]]. Let $K^n$ be the [[Definition:Cartesian Space|cartesian $n$-th power of $K$]], defining [[Definition:Scalar Multiplication on Vector Space|scalar multiplication]] and [[Definition:Vector Addition on Vector Space|vector addition]] component-wise. Equip $...
If $K$ is [[Definition:Hausdorff Space|Hausdorff]], then from [[Product Space is T2 iff Factor Spaces are T2|Product Space is $T_2$ iff Factor Spaces are $T_2$]] the [[Definition:Topology|topology]] on $K^n$ is [[Definition:Hausdorff Space|Hausdorff]]. We therefore just need to show that [[Definition:Scalar Multiplica...
Cartesian Space of Topological Field is Topological Vector Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cartesian_Space_of_Topological_Field_is_Topological_Vector_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cartesian_Space_of_Topological_Field_is_Topological_Vector_Space
[ "Topological Vector Spaces", "Topological Fields", "Hausdorff Topological Vector Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Field", "Definition:Cartesian Product/Cartesian Space", "Definition:Scalar Multiplication/Vector Space", "Definition:Vector Addition/Vector Space", "Definition:Product Topology", "Definition:Topological Vector Space", "Definition:T2 Space", "Definition:Topological Field", "De...
[ "Definition:T2 Space", "Product Space is T2 iff Factor Spaces are T2", "Definition:Topology", "Definition:T2 Space", "Definition:Scalar Multiplication/Vector Space", "Definition:Vector Addition/Vector Space", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "De...
proofwiki-20451
Sum of Continuous Functions on Topological Ring is Continuous
Let $X$ be a topological space. Let $R$ be a topological ring. Let $f, g : X \to R$ be continuous mappings. Then $f + g : X \to R$ is continuous.
Equip the Cartesian product $R \times R$ with its product topology. Define $h : X \to R \times R$ by: :$\map h x = \tuple {\map f x, \map g x}$ for each $x \in X$ and $s : R \times R \to R$ by: :$\map s {x, y} = x + y$ for each $\tuple {x, y} \in R \times R$. From Continuous Mapping to Product Space, $h$ is contin...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $R$ be a [[Definition:Topological Ring|topological ring]]. Let $f, g : X \to R$ be [[Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)|continuous mappings]]. Then $f + g : X \to R$ is [[Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)|continuous]].
Equip the [[Definition:Cartesian Product|Cartesian product]] $R \times R$ with its [[Definition:Product Topology|product topology]]. Define $h : X \to R \times R$ by: :$\map h x = \tuple {\map f x, \map g x}$ for each $x \in X$ and $s : R \times R \to R$ by: :$\map s {x, y} = x + y$ for each $\tuple {x, y} \in...
Sum of Continuous Functions on Topological Ring is Continuous
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Continuous_Functions_on_Topological_Ring_is_Continuous
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Continuous_Functions_on_Topological_Ring_is_Continuous
[ "Continuous Mappings (Topology)", "Topological Rings" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Topological Ring", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)" ]
[ "Definition:Cartesian Product", "Definition:Product Topology", "Continuous Mapping to Product Space", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Topological Ring", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Composite of Continuous Mappings is Continuous", "Definition:Continuous Mapping ...
proofwiki-20452
Product of Continuous Functions on Topological Ring is Continuous
Let $X$ be a topological space. Let $R$ be a topological ring. Let $f, g : X \to R$ be continuous functions. Then $f \cdot g : X \to R$ is continuous.
Equip the Cartesian product $R \times R$ with its product topology. Define $h : X \to R \times R$ by: :$\map h x = \tuple {\map f x, \map g x}$ for each $x \in X$ and $p : R \times R \to R$ by: :$\map p {x, y} = x y$ for each $\tuple {x, y} \in R \times R$. From Continuous Mapping to Product Space, $h$ is continuous...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $R$ be a [[Definition:Topological Ring|topological ring]]. Let $f, g : X \to R$ be [[Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)|continuous functions]]. Then $f \cdot g : X \to R$ is [[Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)|continuous]].
Equip the [[Definition:Cartesian Product|Cartesian product]] $R \times R$ with its [[Definition:Product Topology|product topology]]. Define $h : X \to R \times R$ by: :$\map h x = \tuple {\map f x, \map g x}$ for each $x \in X$ and $p : R \times R \to R$ by: :$\map p {x, y} = x y$ for each $\tuple {x, y} \in R ...
Product of Continuous Functions on Topological Ring is Continuous
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_of_Continuous_Functions_on_Topological_Ring_is_Continuous
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_of_Continuous_Functions_on_Topological_Ring_is_Continuous
[ "Topological Rings" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Topological Ring", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)" ]
[ "Definition:Cartesian Product", "Definition:Product Topology", "Continuous Mapping to Product Space", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Topological Ring", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Composite of Continuous Mappings is Continuous", "Definition:Continuous Mapping ...
proofwiki-20453
Normed Dual Space of Normed Quotient Vector Space is Isometrically Isomorphic to Annihilator
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be a normed vector space over $\GF$. Let $X^\ast$ be the normed dual space of $X$. Let $Y$ be a closed linear subspace of $X$. Let $\paren {X/Y}^\ast$ be the normed dual space of the normed quotient vector space $X/Y$. Then: :$\paren {X/Y}^\ast$ is...
Let $\pi$ be the quotient mapping associated with $X/Y$. Note that for each $f \in \paren {X/Y}^\ast$ we have: :$f \circ \pi \in X^\ast$ by Composition of Bounded Linear Transformations is Bounded Linear Transformation. Further, for $y \in Y$ we have $\map \pi y = 0_{X/Y}$ from Kernel of Quotient Mapping, and so: :$...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be a [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector space]] over $\GF$. Let $X^\ast$ be the [[Definition:Normed Dual Space|normed dual space]] of $X$. Let $Y$ be a [[Definition:Closed Linear Subspace|closed linear subspace]] of $X$. Let $\paren ...
Let $\pi$ be the [[Definition:Quotient Mapping|quotient mapping]] associated with $X/Y$. Note that for each $f \in \paren {X/Y}^\ast$ we have: :$f \circ \pi \in X^\ast$ by [[Composition of Bounded Linear Transformations is Bounded Linear Transformation]]. Further, for $y \in Y$ we have $\map \pi y = 0_{X/Y}$ from...
Normed Dual Space of Normed Quotient Vector Space is Isometrically Isomorphic to Annihilator
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Normed_Dual_Space_of_Normed_Quotient_Vector_Space_is_Isometrically_Isomorphic_to_Annihilator
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Normed_Dual_Space_of_Normed_Quotient_Vector_Space_is_Isometrically_Isomorphic_to_Annihilator
[ "Annihilators of Subspaces of Banach Spaces", "Normed Dual Spaces", "Normed Quotient Vector Spaces", "Annihilators of Subspaces of Banach Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Normed Dual Space", "Definition:Closed Linear Subspace", "Definition:Normed Dual Space", "Definition:Normed Quotient Vector Space", "Definition:Isometric Isomorphism", "Definition:Annihilator of Subspace of Banach Space" ]
[ "Definition:Quotient Mapping", "Norm on Bounded Linear Transformation is Submultiplicative", "Kernel of Quotient Mapping", "Linear Isometry is Injective/Corollary", "Definition:Linear Isometry", "Definition:Surjection", "Definition:Linear Transformation", "Quotient Mapping Maps Unit Open Ball in Norme...
proofwiki-20454
Double Angle Formula for Tangent/Corollary
Let $u = \tan \dfrac \theta 2$. Then: :$\tan \theta = \dfrac {2 u} {1 - u^2}$
From Double Angle Formula for Tangent: :$\tan 2 \theta = \dfrac {2 \tan \theta} {1 - \tan^2 \theta}$ The result follows by substituting $\dfrac \theta 2$ for $\theta$. {{qed}}
Let $u = \tan \dfrac \theta 2$. Then: :$\tan \theta = \dfrac {2 u} {1 - u^2}$
From [[Double Angle Formula for Tangent]]: :$\tan 2 \theta = \dfrac {2 \tan \theta} {1 - \tan^2 \theta}$ The result follows by substituting $\dfrac \theta 2$ for $\theta$. {{qed}}
Double Angle Formula for Tangent/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Double_Angle_Formula_for_Tangent/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Double_Angle_Formula_for_Tangent/Corollary
[ "Double Angle Formula for Tangent" ]
[]
[ "Double Angle Formulas/Tangent" ]
proofwiki-20455
Linear Transformation from Cartesian Space on Hausdorff Topological Field to Topological Vector Space is Continuous
Let $K$ be a topological field. Let $K^n$ be the $n$-Cartesian space as a topological vector space with its product topology. Let $X$ be a topological vector space over $K$. Let $f : K^n \to X$ be a linear transformation. Then $f$ is continuous.
Let $\set {e_1, \ldots, e_n}$ be the standard basis for $K^n$. For each $\alpha_1, \alpha_2, \ldots, \alpha_n$ we have: :$\ds \map f {\sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n \alpha_i e_i} = \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n \alpha_i \map f {e_i}$ Let $\pr_i : K^n \to K$ be the projection of $K^n$ onto its $i$th factor, so that: :$\ds \map {\pr_...
Let $K$ be a [[Definition:Topological Field|topological field]]. Let $K^n$ be the [[Definition:Cartesian Space|$n$-Cartesian space]] as a [[Definition:Topological Vector Space|topological vector space]] with its [[Definition:Product Topology|product topology]]. Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Topological Vector Space|topol...
Let $\set {e_1, \ldots, e_n}$ be the standard [[Definition:Basis of Vector Space|basis]] for $K^n$. For each $\alpha_1, \alpha_2, \ldots, \alpha_n$ we have: :$\ds \map f {\sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n \alpha_i e_i} = \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n \alpha_i \map f {e_i}$ Let $\pr_i : K^n \to K$ be the [[Definition:Projection (Mapp...
Linear Transformation from Cartesian Space on Hausdorff Topological Field to Topological Vector Space is Continuous
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Linear_Transformation_from_Cartesian_Space_on_Hausdorff_Topological_Field_to_Topological_Vector_Space_is_Continuous
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Linear_Transformation_from_Cartesian_Space_on_Hausdorff_Topological_Field_to_Topological_Vector_Space_is_Continuous
[ "Topological Fields", "Topological Vector Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Field", "Definition:Cartesian Product/Cartesian Space", "Definition:Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Product Topology", "Definition:Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Linear Transformation", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)" ]
[ "Definition:Basis of Vector Space", "Definition:Projection (Mapping Theory)", "Definition:Product Topology/Factor Space", "Projection from Product Topology is Continuous", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Linear Combination of Continuous Functions valued in Topological Vector Space is Continuo...
proofwiki-20456
Balanced Set in Topological Vector Space is Connected
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a topological vector space over $\GF$. Let $B \subseteq X$ be a balanced set. Then $B$ is connected.
We first show that $B$ is path connected. Let $x \in B$. Define $p : \closedint 0 1 \to X$ by: :$\map p t = t x$ We clearly have: :$\map p 0 = 0$ and: :$\map p 1 = x$ Since $B$ is balanced, we have: :$t x \in B$ for each $t \in \closedint 0 1$. It remains to show that $p$ is continuous. Define $m : \closedint 0 1 ...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Topological Vector Space|topological vector space]] over $\GF$. Let $B \subseteq X$ be a [[Definition:Balanced Set|balanced set]]. Then $B$ is [[Definition:Connected Set (Topology)|connected]].
We first show that $B$ is [[Definition:Path-Connected Space|path connected]]. Let $x \in B$. Define $p : \closedint 0 1 \to X$ by: :$\map p t = t x$ We clearly have: :$\map p 0 = 0$ and: :$\map p 1 = x$ Since $B$ is [[Definition:Balanced Set|balanced]], we have: :$t x \in B$ for each $t \in \closedint 0 ...
Balanced Set in Topological Vector Space is Connected
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Balanced_Set_in_Topological_Vector_Space_is_Connected
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Balanced_Set_in_Topological_Vector_Space_is_Connected
[ "Balanced Sets", "Connected Topological Spaces", "Topological Vector Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Balanced Set", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)" ]
[ "Definition:Path-Connected/Topological Space", "Definition:Balanced Set", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Restriction of Continuous Mapping is Continuous", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Horizontal Section of Function", "Horizontal Section of Continuous Function is ...
proofwiki-20457
Isomorphism from Cartesian Space to Finite-Dimensional Subspace of Hausdorff Topological Vector Space is Homeomorphism
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a Hausdorff topological vector space over $\GF$. Let $n \in \N$. Let $Y$ be a subspace of $X$ with dimension $n$. Let $f : \GF^n \to Y$ be a vector space isomorphism. Then $f$ is a homeomorphism.
First, we assure ourselves that such a vector space isomorphism $f : \GF^n \to Y$ exists from Same Dimensional Vector Spaces are Isomorphic. From Linear Transformation from Cartesian Space on Hausdorff Topological Field to Topological Vector Space is Continuous, $f$ is continuous. It suffices to show that $f^{-1}$ is c...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Hausdorff Topological Vector Space|Hausdorff topological vector space]] over $\GF$. Let $n \in \N$. Let $Y$ be a [[Definition:Linear Subspace|subspace]] of $X$ with [[Definition:Dimension of Vector Space|dimension]] $n$. Let $f : \GF^n \to Y$ be a [[Definiti...
First, we assure ourselves that such a [[Definition:Vector Space Isomorphism|vector space isomorphism]] $f : \GF^n \to Y$ exists from [[Same Dimensional Vector Spaces are Isomorphic]]. From [[Linear Transformation from Cartesian Space on Hausdorff Topological Field to Topological Vector Space is Continuous]], $f$ is [...
Isomorphism from Cartesian Space to Finite-Dimensional Subspace of Hausdorff Topological Vector Space is Homeomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Isomorphism_from_Cartesian_Space_to_Finite-Dimensional_Subspace_of_Hausdorff_Topological_Vector_Space_is_Homeomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Isomorphism_from_Cartesian_Space_to_Finite-Dimensional_Subspace_of_Hausdorff_Topological_Vector_Space_is_Homeomorphism
[ "Topological Vector Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Hausdorff Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Linear Subspace", "Definition:Dimension of Vector Space", "Definition:Isomorphism (Abstract Algebra)/R-Algebraic Structure Isomorphism/Vector Space Isomorphism", "Definition:Homeomorphism" ]
[ "Definition:Isomorphism (Abstract Algebra)/R-Algebraic Structure Isomorphism/Vector Space Isomorphism", "Same Dimensional Vector Spaces are Isomorphic", "Linear Transformation from Cartesian Space on Hausdorff Topological Field to Topological Vector Space is Continuous", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topolo...
proofwiki-20458
Finite-Dimensional Subspace of Hausdorff Topological Vector Space is Closed
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a Hausdorff topological vector space over $\GF$. Let $n \in \N$. Let $Y$ be a subspace of $X$ with dimension $n$. Then $Y$ is closed.
Let $f : \GF^n \to Y$ be a vector space isomorphism. From Isomorphism from Cartesian Space to Finite-Dimensional Subspace of Hausdorff Topological Vector Space is Homeomorphism, $f$ is a homeomorphism. Let $B$ be the unit ball in $\GF^n$. Let $D$ be the closed unit ball in $\GF^n$. Let $S$ be the unit sphere in $\GF...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Hausdorff Topological Vector Space|Hausdorff topological vector space]] over $\GF$. Let $n \in \N$. Let $Y$ be a [[Definition:Linear Subspace|subspace]] of $X$ with [[Definition:Dimension of Vector Space|dimension]] $n$. Then $Y$ is [[Definition:Closed Set|...
Let $f : \GF^n \to Y$ be a [[Definition:Vector Space Isomorphism|vector space isomorphism]]. From [[Isomorphism from Cartesian Space to Finite-Dimensional Subspace of Hausdorff Topological Vector Space is Homeomorphism]], $f$ is a [[Definition:Homeomorphism|homeomorphism]]. Let $B$ be the [[Definition:Unit Ball|unit...
Finite-Dimensional Subspace of Hausdorff Topological Vector Space is Closed
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Finite-Dimensional_Subspace_of_Hausdorff_Topological_Vector_Space_is_Closed
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Finite-Dimensional_Subspace_of_Hausdorff_Topological_Vector_Space_is_Closed
[ "Hausdorff Topological Vector Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Hausdorff Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Linear Subspace", "Definition:Dimension of Vector Space", "Definition:Closed Set" ]
[ "Definition:Isomorphism (Abstract Algebra)/R-Algebraic Structure Isomorphism/Vector Space Isomorphism", "Isomorphism from Cartesian Space to Finite-Dimensional Subspace of Hausdorff Topological Vector Space is Homeomorphism", "Definition:Homeomorphism", "Definition:Unit Ball", "Definition:Closed Unit Ball",...
proofwiki-20459
Dilation of Compact Set in Topological Vector Space is Compact
Let $k$ be a topological field. Let $X$ be a topological vector space over $X$. Let $K$ be a compact subset of $X$. Let $t \in k \setminus \set {0_k}$. Then $t K$ is compact.
Let $\family {U_\alpha : \alpha \in I}$ be open sets such that: :$\ds t K \subseteq \bigcup_{\alpha \mathop \in I} U_\alpha$ From Dilation of Union of Subsets of Vector Space, we have: :$\ds K \subseteq \bigcup_{\alpha \mathop \in I} \paren {t^{-1} U_\alpha}$ From Dilation of Open Set in Topological Vector Space is ...
Let $k$ be a [[Definition:Topological Field|topological field]]. Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Topological Vector Space|topological vector space]] over $X$. Let $K$ be a [[Definition:Compact Topological Space|compact subset]] of $X$. Let $t \in k \setminus \set {0_k}$. Then $t K$ is [[Definition:Compact Topological...
Let $\family {U_\alpha : \alpha \in I}$ be [[Definition:Open Set|open sets]] such that: :$\ds t K \subseteq \bigcup_{\alpha \mathop \in I} U_\alpha$ From [[Dilation of Union of Subsets of Vector Space]], we have: :$\ds K \subseteq \bigcup_{\alpha \mathop \in I} \paren {t^{-1} U_\alpha}$ From [[Dilation of Open Set...
Dilation of Compact Set in Topological Vector Space is Compact/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Dilation_of_Compact_Set_in_Topological_Vector_Space_is_Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Dilation_of_Compact_Set_in_Topological_Vector_Space_is_Compact/Proof_1
[ "Dilation of Compact Set in Topological Vector Space is Compact", "Dilations of Subsets of Vector Spaces", "Topological Vector Spaces", "Compact Topological Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Field", "Definition:Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Definition:Compact Topological Space" ]
[ "Definition:Open Set", "Dilation of Union of Subsets of Vector Space", "Dilation of Open Set in Topological Vector Space is Open", "Definition:Open Set", "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Dilation of Union of Subsets of Vector Space", "Definition:Open Cover", "Definition:Subcover/Finite", "De...
proofwiki-20460
Dilation of Compact Set in Topological Vector Space is Compact
Let $k$ be a topological field. Let $X$ be a topological vector space over $X$. Let $K$ be a compact subset of $X$. Let $t \in k \setminus \set {0_k}$. Then $t K$ is compact.
From Dilation Mapping on Topological Vector Space is Continuous, the mapping $c_t : X \to X$ defined by: :$\map {c_t} x = t x$ for each $x \in X$ is continuous. From Continuous Image of Compact Space is Compact: :$\map {c_t} K = t K$ is compact. {{qed}}
Let $k$ be a [[Definition:Topological Field|topological field]]. Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Topological Vector Space|topological vector space]] over $X$. Let $K$ be a [[Definition:Compact Topological Space|compact subset]] of $X$. Let $t \in k \setminus \set {0_k}$. Then $t K$ is [[Definition:Compact Topological...
From [[Dilation Mapping on Topological Vector Space is Continuous]], the [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]] $c_t : X \to X$ defined by: :$\map {c_t} x = t x$ for each $x \in X$ is [[Definition:Continuous Mapping|continuous]]. From [[Continuous Image of Compact Space is Compact]]: :$\map {c_t} K = t K$ is [[Definition:Comp...
Dilation of Compact Set in Topological Vector Space is Compact/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Dilation_of_Compact_Set_in_Topological_Vector_Space_is_Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Dilation_of_Compact_Set_in_Topological_Vector_Space_is_Compact/Proof_2
[ "Dilation of Compact Set in Topological Vector Space is Compact", "Dilations of Subsets of Vector Spaces", "Topological Vector Spaces", "Compact Topological Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Field", "Definition:Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Definition:Compact Topological Space" ]
[ "Dilation Mapping on Topological Vector Space is Continuous", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Continuous Mapping", "Continuous Image of Compact Space is Compact", "Definition:Compact Topological Space" ]
proofwiki-20461
Topological Dual Space of Hausdorff Locally Convex Space Separates Points
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \PP}$ be a Hausdorff locally convex space over $\GF$. Let $X^\ast$ be the topological dual of $X$. Let $x \in X$. Then $X^\ast$ separates points. That is, if $x, y \in X$ are such that: :$\map f x = \map f y$ for all $f \in X^\ast$ we have that $x = y$.
Suppose $x \ne y$. It suffices to find $f \in X^\ast$ such that $\map f x \ne \map f y$. From Finite Topological Space is Compact, $\set {\mathbf 0_X}$ is compact. From Compact Subspace of Hausdorff Space is Closed, $\set {\mathbf 0_X}$ is closed. Since $x \ne y$, we have: :$x - y \not \in X \setminus \set {\mathbf...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \PP}$ be a [[Definition:Locally Convex Space/Hausdorff|Hausdorff]] [[Definition:Locally Convex Space|locally convex space]] over $\GF$. Let $X^\ast$ be the [[Definition:Topological Dual Space|topological dual]] of $X$. Let $x \in X$. Then $X^\ast$ [[Definition:Mappi...
Suppose $x \ne y$. It suffices to find $f \in X^\ast$ such that $\map f x \ne \map f y$. From [[Finite Topological Space is Compact]], $\set {\mathbf 0_X}$ is [[Definition:Compact Topological Space|compact]]. From [[Compact Subspace of Hausdorff Space is Closed]], $\set {\mathbf 0_X}$ is [[Definition:Closed Set|c...
Topological Dual Space of Hausdorff Locally Convex Space Separates Points
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Topological_Dual_Space_of_Hausdorff_Locally_Convex_Space_Separates_Points
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Topological_Dual_Space_of_Hausdorff_Locally_Convex_Space_Separates_Points
[ "Locally Convex Spaces", "Topological Dual Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Locally Convex Space/Hausdorff", "Definition:Locally Convex Space", "Definition:Topological Dual Space", "Definition:Mappings Separating Points" ]
[ "Finite Topological Space is Compact", "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Compact Subspace of Hausdorff Space is Closed", "Definition:Closed Set", "Existence of Non-Zero Continuous Linear Functional vanishing on Proper Closed Subspace of Locally Convex Space", "Category:Locally Convex Spaces", "Ca...
proofwiki-20462
Characterization of von Neumann-Boundedness in Hausdorff Locally Convex Space
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \PP}$ be a Hausdorff locally convex space over $\GF$. Let $U \subseteq X$. Then $U$ is von Neumann-bounded {{iff}}: :for each $p \in \PP$ there exists $C_p > 0$ such that: ::$\map p x < C_p$ :for each $x \in U$.
For each $p \in \PP$, let: :$B_p = \set {y \in X : \map p y < 1}$ Note that by the definition of the standard topology, $B_p$ is an open neighborhood of $\mathbf 0_X$. Let $r > 0$. From {{SeminormAxiom|2}}, for $y \in X$ we have: :$\map p y < 1$ {{iff}}: :$\map p {r y} < r$ So, we have: :$r B_p = \set {y \in X :...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \PP}$ be a [[Definition:Locally Convex Space/Hausdorff|Hausdorff]] [[Definition:Locally Convex Space|locally convex space]] over $\GF$. Let $U \subseteq X$. Then $U$ is [[Definition:von Neumann-Bounded Subset of Topological Vector Space|von Neumann-bounded]] {{iff}}: ...
For each $p \in \PP$, let: :$B_p = \set {y \in X : \map p y < 1}$ Note that by the definition of the [[Definition:Locally Convex Space/Standard Topology|standard topology]], $B_p$ is an [[Definition:Open Neighborhood|open neighborhood]] of $\mathbf 0_X$. Let $r > 0$. From {{SeminormAxiom|2}}, for $y \in X$ we ha...
Characterization of von Neumann-Boundedness in Hausdorff Locally Convex Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characterization_of_von_Neumann-Boundedness_in_Hausdorff_Locally_Convex_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characterization_of_von_Neumann-Boundedness_in_Hausdorff_Locally_Convex_Space
[ "Von Neumann-Bounded Subsets of Topological Vector Spaces", "Locally Convex Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Locally Convex Space/Hausdorff", "Definition:Locally Convex Space", "Definition:von Neumann-Bounded Subset of Topological Vector Space" ]
[ "Definition:Locally Convex Space/Standard Topology", "Definition:Open Neighborhood", "Definition:Open Neighborhood" ]
proofwiki-20463
Normed Vector Space is Hausdorff Locally Convex Space
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be a normed vector space. Then $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ is a Hausdorff locally convex space.
From Normed Vector Space is Locally Convex Space, $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ can be viewed as the locally convex space $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$. Now for $x \ne \mathbf 0_X$, we have: :$\norm x \ne 0$ from {{NormAxiomVector|1}}. So $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ is a Hausdorff locally convex ...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be a [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector space]]. Then $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ is a [[Definition:Locally Convex Space/Hausdorff|Hausdorff]] [[Definition:Locally Convex Space|locally convex space]].
From [[Normed Vector Space is Locally Convex Space]], $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ can be viewed as the [[Definition:Locally Convex Space|locally convex space]] $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$. Now for $x \ne \mathbf 0_X$, we have: :$\norm x \ne 0$ from {{NormAxiomVector|1}}. So $\struct {X, \norm {\,...
Normed Vector Space is Hausdorff Locally Convex Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Normed_Vector_Space_is_Hausdorff_Locally_Convex_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Normed_Vector_Space_is_Hausdorff_Locally_Convex_Space
[ "Locally Convex Spaces", "Normed Vector Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Locally Convex Space/Hausdorff", "Definition:Locally Convex Space" ]
[ "Normed Vector Space is Locally Convex Space", "Definition:Locally Convex Space", "Definition:Locally Convex Space/Hausdorff", "Definition:Locally Convex Space", "Category:Locally Convex Spaces", "Category:Normed Vector Spaces" ]
proofwiki-20464
Characterization of von Neumann-Boundedness in Normed Vector Space
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be a normed vector space. Let $U \subseteq X$. Then $U$ is von Neumann-bounded {{iff}} it is bounded as a subset of a normed vector space.
From Normed Vector Space is Hausdorff Locally Convex Space, $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ can be viewed as the Hausdorff locally convex space $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$. The result is then immediate from Characterization of von Neumann-Boundedness in Hausdorff Locally Convex Space. {{qed}} Category:Von ...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be a [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector space]]. Let $U \subseteq X$. Then $U$ is [[Definition:von Neumann-Bounded Subset of Topological Vector Space|von Neumann-bounded]] {{iff}} it is [[Definition:Bounded Subset of Normed Vector Spa...
From [[Normed Vector Space is Hausdorff Locally Convex Space]], $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ can be viewed as the [[Definition:Locally Convex Space/Hausdorff|Hausdorff]] [[Definition:Locally Convex Space|locally convex space]] $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$. The result is then immediate from [[Characteriz...
Characterization of von Neumann-Boundedness in Normed Vector Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characterization_of_von_Neumann-Boundedness_in_Normed_Vector_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characterization_of_von_Neumann-Boundedness_in_Normed_Vector_Space
[ "Von Neumann-Bounded Subsets of Topological Vector Spaces", "Normed Vector Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:von Neumann-Bounded Subset of Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Bounded Subset of Normed Vector Space" ]
[ "Normed Vector Space is Hausdorff Locally Convex Space", "Definition:Locally Convex Space/Hausdorff", "Definition:Locally Convex Space", "Characterization of von Neumann-Boundedness in Hausdorff Locally Convex Space", "Category:Von Neumann-Bounded Subsets of Topological Vector Spaces", "Category:Normed Ve...
proofwiki-20465
Initial Topology on Normed Vector Space is Weak Topology
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be a normed vector space over $\GF$. Let $X^\ast$ be the normed dual space of $X$. Let $w$ be the initial topology on $X$ with respect to $X^\ast$. Then $w$ is the weak topology on $X$.
From Normed Dual Space Separates Points, if $x \ne y$ then there exists $f \in X^\ast$ such that $\map f x \ne \map f y$. That is, if $x \ne \mathbf 0_X$, there exists $f \in X^\ast$ such that $\map f x \ne 0$. {{qed}} Category:Weak Topologies on Topological Vector Spaces Category:Normed Vector Spaces fs598imvc8zv7xhcr...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be a [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector space]] over $\GF$. Let $X^\ast$ be the [[Definition:Normed Dual Space|normed dual space]] of $X$. Let $w$ be the [[Definition:Initial Topology|initial topology]] on $X$ with respect to $X^\ast...
From [[Normed Dual Space Separates Points]], if $x \ne y$ then there exists $f \in X^\ast$ such that $\map f x \ne \map f y$. That is, if $x \ne \mathbf 0_X$, there exists $f \in X^\ast$ such that $\map f x \ne 0$. {{qed}} [[Category:Weak Topologies on Topological Vector Spaces]] [[Category:Normed Vector Spaces]] fs5...
Initial Topology on Normed Vector Space is Weak Topology
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Initial_Topology_on_Normed_Vector_Space_is_Weak_Topology
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Initial_Topology_on_Normed_Vector_Space_is_Weak_Topology
[ "Weak Topologies on Topological Vector Spaces", "Normed Vector Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Normed Dual Space", "Definition:Initial Topology", "Definition:Weak Topology on Topological Vector Space" ]
[ "Normed Dual Space Separates Points", "Category:Weak Topologies on Topological Vector Spaces", "Category:Normed Vector Spaces" ]
proofwiki-20466
Weak Topology on Topological Vector Space over Hausdorff Topological Field is Hausdorff
Let $K$ be a Hausdorff topological field. Let $X$ be a topological vector space over $K$ with weak topology $w$. Then $\struct {X, w}$ is Hausdorff.
From the definition of the weak topology, if $x, y \in X$ have $x \ne y$, then $x - y \ne \mathbf 0_X$: :there exists $f \in X^\ast$ such that $\map f {x - y} \ne 0$. Since $f$ is linear, we then have $\map f x \ne \map f y$. Since $K$ is Hausdorff, we therefore obtain that $\struct {X, w}$ is Hausdorff from Initial ...
Let $K$ be a [[Definition:Hausdorff Space|Hausdorff]] [[Definition:Topological Field|topological field]]. Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Topological Vector Space|topological vector space]] over $K$ with [[Definition:Weak Topology on Topological Vector Space|weak topology]] $w$. Then $\struct {X, w}$ is [[Definition:Haus...
From the definition of the [[Definition:Weak Topology on Topological Vector Space|weak topology]], if $x, y \in X$ have $x \ne y$, then $x - y \ne \mathbf 0_X$: :there exists $f \in X^\ast$ such that $\map f {x - y} \ne 0$. Since $f$ is [[Definition:Linear Functional|linear]], we then have $\map f x \ne \map f y$. ...
Weak Topology on Topological Vector Space over Hausdorff Topological Field is Hausdorff
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Weak_Topology_on_Topological_Vector_Space_over_Hausdorff_Topological_Field_is_Hausdorff
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Weak_Topology_on_Topological_Vector_Space_over_Hausdorff_Topological_Field_is_Hausdorff
[ "Weak Topologies on Topological Vector Spaces", "Hausdorff Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:T2 Space", "Definition:Topological Field", "Definition:Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Weak Topology on Topological Vector Space", "Definition:T2 Space" ]
[ "Definition:Weak Topology on Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Linear Functional", "Definition:T2 Space", "Definition:T2 Space", "Initial Topology with respect to Point-Separating Family of Mappings onto Hausdorff Spaces is Hausdorff", "Category:Weak Topologies on Topological Vector Spaces", "Categ...
proofwiki-20467
Equation of Wave with Constant Velocity
Let $\phi$ be a wave which is propagated along the $x$-axis in the positive direction with constant velocity $c$ and without change of shape. Let $\paren {\map \phi x}_{t \mathop = 0} = \map f x$ be the '''wave profile''' of $\phi$. Then the '''disturbance''' of $\phi$ at point $x$ and time $t$ can be expressed using t...
Let us imagine a snapshot of $\phi$ at the time $t = 0$. Then, {{hypothesis}}, the wave $\phi$ is described by the equation: :$\phi = \map f x$ Also {{hypothesis}}, $\phi$ is propagated with no change of shape. Hence, an imagined snapshot of $\phi$ at the general time $t$ will be: :identical with that at $t = 0$ :moved...
Let $\phi$ be a [[Definition:Wave|wave]] which is [[Definition:Direction of Propagation of Wave|propagated]] along the [[Definition:X-Axis|$x$-axis]] in the [[Definition:Positive Direction|positive direction]] with [[Definition:Constant|constant]] [[Definition:Velocity|velocity]] $c$ and without change of shape. Let $...
Let us imagine a snapshot of $\phi$ at the [[Definition:Time|time]] $t = 0$. Then, {{hypothesis}}, the [[Definition:Wave|wave]] $\phi$ is described by the equation: :$\phi = \map f x$ Also {{hypothesis}}, $\phi$ is [[Definition:Direction of Propagation of Wave|propagated]] with no change of shape. Hence, an imagined...
Equation of Wave with Constant Velocity
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equation_of_Wave_with_Constant_Velocity
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equation_of_Wave_with_Constant_Velocity
[ "Equation of Wave with Constant Velocity", "Examples of Use of Wave Equation" ]
[ "Definition:Wave", "Definition:Wave/Direction of Propagation", "Definition:Axis/X-Axis", "Definition:Axis/Positive Direction", "Definition:Constant", "Definition:Velocity", "Definition:Wave Profile", "Definition:Wave/Disturbance", "Definition:Point", "Definition:Instant of Time", "Definition:Equ...
[ "Definition:Time", "Definition:Wave", "Definition:Wave/Direction of Propagation", "Definition:Time", "Definition:Axis/X-Axis", "Definition:Distance between Points", "Equations of Motion with Constant Acceleration/Distance after Time", "Definition:Axis/Positive Direction", "Definition:Axis/X-Axis", ...
proofwiki-20468
Equation of Wave with Constant Velocity/Corollary
Let $\phi$ be a wave which is propagated along the $x$-axis in the negative direction with constant velocity $c$ and without change of shape. Let $\paren {\map \phi x}_{t \mathop = 0} = \map f x$ be the '''wave profile''' of $\phi$. Then the '''disturbance''' of $\phi$ at point $x$ and time $t$ can be expressed using t...
We have {{hypothesis}} that the velocity of $\phi$ in the negative direction is $c$. Hence the velocity of $\phi$ in the positive direction is $-c$. By Equation of Wave with Constant Velocity: :$\phi = \map f {x - \paren {-c} t}$ Hence the result. {{qed}}
Let $\phi$ be a [[Definition:Wave|wave]] which is [[Definition:Direction of Propagation of Wave|propagated]] along the [[Definition:X-Axis|$x$-axis]] in the [[Definition:Negative Direction|negative direction]] with [[Definition:Constant|constant]] [[Definition:Velocity|velocity]] $c$ and without change of shape. Let $...
We have {{hypothesis}} that the [[Definition:Velocity|velocity]] of $\phi$ in the [[Definition:Negative Direction|negative direction]] is $c$. Hence the [[Definition:Velocity|velocity]] of $\phi$ in the [[Definition:Positive Direction|positive direction]] is $-c$. By [[Equation of Wave with Constant Velocity]]: :$\ph...
Equation of Wave with Constant Velocity/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equation_of_Wave_with_Constant_Velocity/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equation_of_Wave_with_Constant_Velocity/Corollary
[ "Equation of Wave with Constant Velocity" ]
[ "Definition:Wave", "Definition:Wave/Direction of Propagation", "Definition:Axis/X-Axis", "Definition:Axis/Negative Direction", "Definition:Constant", "Definition:Velocity", "Definition:Wave Profile", "Definition:Wave/Disturbance", "Definition:Point", "Definition:Instant of Time", "Definition:Equ...
[ "Definition:Velocity", "Definition:Axis/Negative Direction", "Definition:Velocity", "Definition:Axis/Positive Direction", "Equation of Wave with Constant Velocity" ]
proofwiki-20469
Characterization of Continuity of Linear Functional in Weak Topology
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a topological vector space over $\GF$ with weak topology $w$. Let $X^\ast$ be the topological dual space of $X$. Let $f : X \to \GF$ be a linear functional. Then $f$ is $w$-continuous {{iff}} $f \in X^\ast$. That is: :$\struct {X, w}^\ast = X^\ast$ {{explain|Better to introdu...
This is precisely Continuity of Linear Functionals in Initial Topology on Vector Space Generated by Linear Functionals, taking $F = X^\ast$. {{qed}} Category:Weak Topologies on Topological Vector Spaces n7q6ziw6u8e8gpvaz2rzc2qfjlfaxeq
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Topological Vector Space|topological vector space]] over $\GF$ with [[Definition:Weak Topology on Topological Vector Space|weak topology]] $w$. Let $X^\ast$ be the [[Definition:Topological Dual Space|topological dual space]] of $X$. Let $f : X \to \GF$ be a [[...
This is precisely [[Continuity of Linear Functionals in Initial Topology on Vector Space Generated by Linear Functionals]], taking $F = X^\ast$. {{qed}} [[Category:Weak Topologies on Topological Vector Spaces]] n7q6ziw6u8e8gpvaz2rzc2qfjlfaxeq
Characterization of Continuity of Linear Functional in Weak Topology
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characterization_of_Continuity_of_Linear_Functional_in_Weak_Topology
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characterization_of_Continuity_of_Linear_Functional_in_Weak_Topology
[ "Weak Topologies on Topological Vector Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Weak Topology on Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Topological Dual Space", "Definition:Linear Functional", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)" ]
[ "Continuity of Linear Functionals in Weak Topology Induced by Pair of Vector Spaces with Bilinear Mapping/Corollary", "Category:Weak Topologies on Topological Vector Spaces" ]
proofwiki-20470
Equivalence of Definitions of Weak Convergence on Topological Vector Space
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a topological vector space over $\GF$. Let $X^\ast$ be the topological dual space of $X$. Suppose that: :for each $x, y \in X$ with $x \ne y$, there exists $f \in X^\ast$ such that $\map f x \ne \map f y$. Let $\sequence {x_n}_{n \mathop \in \N}$ be a sequence in $X$. Let $x...
=== Definition 1 implies Definition 2 === Suppose that $\sequence {x_n}_{n \mathop \in \N}$ converges in $\struct {X, w}$. Let $f \in X^\ast$ and $\epsilon > 0$. We want to show that: :$\map f {x_n} \to \map f x$ in $\GF$. Let $\map {B_r} {\lambda, \GF}$ be the open ball in $\GF$ of radius $r$ and Centre $\lambda$. ...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Topological Vector Space|topological vector space]] over $\GF$. Let $X^\ast$ be the [[Definition:Topological Dual Space|topological dual space]] of $X$. Suppose that: :for each $x, y \in X$ with $x \ne y$, there exists $f \in X^\ast$ such that $\map f x \ne ...
=== Definition 1 implies Definition 2 === Suppose that $\sequence {x_n}_{n \mathop \in \N}$ [[Definition:Convergent Sequence (Topology)|converges]] in $\struct {X, w}$. Let $f \in X^\ast$ and $\epsilon > 0$. We want to show that: :$\map f {x_n} \to \map f x$ in $\GF$. Let $\map {B_r} {\lambda, \GF}$ be the [[De...
Equivalence of Definitions of Weak Convergence on Topological Vector Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Weak_Convergence_on_Topological_Vector_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Weak_Convergence_on_Topological_Vector_Space
[ "Weak Convergence (Topological Vector Spaces)", "Weak Topologies on Topological Vector Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Topological Dual Space", "Definition:Sequence" ]
[ "Definition:Convergent Sequence/Topology", "Definition:Open Ball", "Definition:Open Ball/Radius", "Definition:Open Ball/Center", "Characterization of Continuity of Linear Functional in Weak Topology", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Initial Topology", "Definition:Weakly Open Se...
proofwiki-20471
Wave Profile of Harmonic Wave
Let $\phi$ be a harmonic wave which is propagated along the $x$-axis in the positive direction with constant velocity $c$. Then the '''wave profile''' of $\phi$ can be expressed as: :$\paren {\map \phi x}_{t \mathop = 0} = a \cos \omega x$
By definition, a '''harmonic wave''' is a wave whose wave profile can be expressed as a sine curve. By definition, a sine curve can be expressed in the form: :$\map \phi x = a \map \sin {\omega x + \epsilon}$ where $a$, $\omega$ and $\epsilon$ are arbitrary constants. We select $\epsilon$ so as to set: :$\epsilon = \df...
Let $\phi$ be a [[Definition:Harmonic Wave|harmonic wave]] which is [[Definition:Direction of Propagation of Wave|propagated]] along the [[Definition:X-Axis|$x$-axis]] in the [[Definition:Positive Direction|positive direction]] with [[Definition:Constant|constant]] [[Definition:Velocity|velocity]] $c$. Then the '''[[...
By definition, a '''[[Definition:Harmonic Wave|harmonic wave]]''' is a [[Definition:Wave|wave]] whose [[Definition:Wave Profile|wave profile]] can be expressed as a [[Definition:Sine Curve|sine curve]]. By definition, a [[Definition:Sine Curve|sine curve]] can be expressed in the form: :$\map \phi x = a \map \sin {\om...
Wave Profile of Harmonic Wave
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Wave_Profile_of_Harmonic_Wave
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Wave_Profile_of_Harmonic_Wave
[ "Harmonic Waves", "Wave Profiles" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Wave", "Definition:Wave/Direction of Propagation", "Definition:Axis/X-Axis", "Definition:Axis/Positive Direction", "Definition:Constant", "Definition:Velocity", "Definition:Wave Profile" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Wave", "Definition:Wave", "Definition:Wave Profile", "Definition:Sine Curve", "Definition:Sine Curve", "Definition:Constant", "Definition:Time", "Definition:Equation", "Definition:Wave", "Definition:Sine Curve", "Definition:Wave Profile" ]
proofwiki-20472
Equation of Harmonic Wave
Let $\phi$ be a harmonic wave which is propagated along the $x$-axis in the positive direction with constant velocity $c$. Then the '''disturbance''' of $\phi$ at point $x$ and time $t$ can be expressed using the equation: :$\map \phi {x, t} = a \map \cos {\omega \paren {x - c t} }$
From Wave Profile of Harmonic Wave: :$\forall x \in \R: \paren {\map \phi x}_{t \mathop = 0} = a \cos \omega x$ From Equation of Wave with Constant Velocity: :$\forall x, t \in \R: \map \phi {x, t} = a \map \cos {\omega \paren {x - c t} }$ Hence the result. {{qed}}
Let $\phi$ be a [[Definition:Harmonic Wave|harmonic wave]] which is [[Definition:Direction of Propagation of Wave|propagated]] along the [[Definition:X-Axis|$x$-axis]] in the [[Definition:Positive Direction|positive direction]] with [[Definition:Constant|constant]] [[Definition:Velocity|velocity]] $c$. Then the '''[[D...
From [[Wave Profile of Harmonic Wave]]: :$\forall x \in \R: \paren {\map \phi x}_{t \mathop = 0} = a \cos \omega x$ From [[Equation of Wave with Constant Velocity]]: :$\forall x, t \in \R: \map \phi {x, t} = a \map \cos {\omega \paren {x - c t} }$ Hence the result. {{qed}}
Equation of Harmonic Wave
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equation_of_Harmonic_Wave
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equation_of_Harmonic_Wave
[ "Equation of Harmonic Wave", "Harmonic Waves" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Wave", "Definition:Wave/Direction of Propagation", "Definition:Axis/X-Axis", "Definition:Axis/Positive Direction", "Definition:Constant", "Definition:Velocity", "Definition:Wave/Disturbance", "Definition:Point", "Definition:Instant of Time", "Definition:Equation" ]
[ "Wave Profile of Harmonic Wave", "Equation of Wave with Constant Velocity" ]
proofwiki-20473
Wavelength of Harmonic Wave
Let $\phi$ be a harmonic wave expressed as: :$\forall x, t \in \R: \map \phi {x, t} = a \map \cos {\omega \paren {x - c t} }$ The '''wavelength''' $\lambda$ of $\phi$ can be expressed as: :$\lambda = \dfrac {2 \pi} \omega$
By definition, $\lambda$ is the period of the wave profile of $\phi$. From Wave Profile of Harmonic Wave, the wave profile of $\phi$ is given by: :$\paren {\map \phi x}_{t \mathop = 0} = a \cos \omega x$ From Period of Real Cosine Function: :$\paren {\map \phi x}_{t \mathop = 0} = a \cos {\omega x + 2 \pi}$ So the peri...
Let $\phi$ be a [[Definition:Harmonic Wave|harmonic wave]] expressed as: :$\forall x, t \in \R: \map \phi {x, t} = a \map \cos {\omega \paren {x - c t} }$ The '''[[Definition:Wavelength of Harmonic Wave|wavelength]]''' $\lambda$ of $\phi$ can be expressed as: :$\lambda = \dfrac {2 \pi} \omega$
By definition, $\lambda$ is the [[Definition:Period of Periodic Real Function|period]] of the [[Definition:Wave Profile|wave profile]] of $\phi$. From [[Wave Profile of Harmonic Wave]], the [[Definition:Wave Profile|wave profile]] of $\phi$ is given by: :$\paren {\map \phi x}_{t \mathop = 0} = a \cos \omega x$ From ...
Wavelength of Harmonic Wave
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Wavelength_of_Harmonic_Wave
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Wavelength_of_Harmonic_Wave
[ "Wavelength", "Harmonic Waves" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Wave", "Definition:Harmonic Wave/Wavelength" ]
[ "Definition:Periodic Real Function/Period", "Definition:Wave Profile", "Wave Profile of Harmonic Wave", "Definition:Wave Profile", "Period of Real Cosine Function", "Definition:Periodic Real Function/Period", "Definition:Harmonic Wave/Wavelength" ]
proofwiki-20474
Period of Real Cosine Function
The period of the real cosine function is $2 \pi$. That is, $2 \pi$ is the smallest value $L \in \R_{>0}$ such that: :$\forall x \in \R: \cos x = \map \cos {x + L}$
From Sine and Cosine are Periodic on Reals, we have that $\cos$ is a periodic real function. Let $L$ be that period. From Cosine of Angle plus Full Angle: :$\map \cos {x + 2 \pi} = \cos x$ So $L = 2 \pi$ satisfies: :$\forall x \in \R: \cos x = \map \cos {x + L}$ It remains to be shown that $2 \pi$ is the smallest such ...
The [[Definition:Period of Periodic Real Function|period]] of the [[Definition:Real Cosine Function|real cosine function]] is $2 \pi$. That is, $2 \pi$ is the [[Definition:Smallest|smallest]] value $L \in \R_{>0}$ such that: :$\forall x \in \R: \cos x = \map \cos {x + L}$
From [[Sine and Cosine are Periodic on Reals]], we have that $\cos$ is a [[Definition:Periodic Real Function|periodic real function]]. Let $L$ be that [[Definition:Period of Periodic Real Function|period]]. From [[Cosine of Angle plus Full Angle]]: :$\map \cos {x + 2 \pi} = \cos x$ So $L = 2 \pi$ satisfies: :$\foral...
Period of Real Cosine Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Period_of_Real_Cosine_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Period_of_Real_Cosine_Function
[ "Cosine Function", "Periodic Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Periodic Real Function/Period", "Definition:Cosine/Real Function", "Definition:Smallest" ]
[ "Sine and Cosine are Periodic on Reals", "Definition:Periodic Function/Real", "Definition:Periodic Real Function/Period", "Cosine of Angle plus Full Angle", "Cosine of Right Angle", "Cosine of Three Right Angles", "Cosine of Angle plus Full Angle", "Definition:Periodic Real Function/Period", "Defini...
proofwiki-20475
Period of Real Sine Function
The period of the real sine function is $2 \pi$. That is, $2 \pi$ is the smallest value $L \in \R_{>0}$ such that: :$\forall x \in \R: \sin x = \map \sin {x + L}$
From Sine and Cosine are Periodic on Reals, we have that $\sin$ is a periodic real function. Let $L$ be that period. From Sine of Angle plus Full Angle: :$\map \sin {x + 2 \pi} = \sin x$ So $L = 2 \pi$ satisfies: :$\forall x \in \R: \sin x = \map \sin {x + L}$ It remains to be shown that $2 \pi$ is the smallest such $L...
The [[Definition:Period of Periodic Real Function|period]] of the [[Definition:Real Sine Function|real sine function]] is $2 \pi$. That is, $2 \pi$ is the [[Definition:Smallest|smallest]] value $L \in \R_{>0}$ such that: :$\forall x \in \R: \sin x = \map \sin {x + L}$
From [[Sine and Cosine are Periodic on Reals]], we have that $\sin$ is a [[Definition:Periodic Real Function|periodic real function]]. Let $L$ be that [[Definition:Period of Periodic Real Function|period]]. From [[Sine of Angle plus Full Angle]]: :$\map \sin {x + 2 \pi} = \sin x$ So $L = 2 \pi$ satisfies: :$\forall ...
Period of Real Sine Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Period_of_Real_Sine_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Period_of_Real_Sine_Function
[ "Sine Function", "Periodic Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Periodic Real Function/Period", "Definition:Sine/Real Function", "Definition:Smallest" ]
[ "Sine and Cosine are Periodic on Reals", "Definition:Periodic Function/Real", "Definition:Periodic Real Function/Period", "Sine of Angle plus Full Angle", "Sine of Zero is Zero", "Sine of Straight Angle", "Sine of Angle plus Full Angle", "Definition:Periodic Real Function/Period", "Definition:Sine/R...
proofwiki-20476
Period of Harmonic Wave
Let $\phi$ be a harmonic wave expressed as: :$\forall x, t \in \R: \map \phi {x, t} = a \map \cos {\omega \paren {x - c t} }$ The '''period''' $\tau$ of $\phi$ can be expressed as: :$\tau = \dfrac \lambda c$ where $\lambda$ is the wavelength of $\phi$.
By definition, a harmonic wave is an instance of a periodic wave. Hence Period of Periodic Wave can be used directly. {{qed}}
Let $\phi$ be a [[Definition:Harmonic Wave|harmonic wave]] expressed as: :$\forall x, t \in \R: \map \phi {x, t} = a \map \cos {\omega \paren {x - c t} }$ The '''[[Definition:Period of Harmonic Wave|period]]''' $\tau$ of $\phi$ can be expressed as: :$\tau = \dfrac \lambda c$ where $\lambda$ is the [[Definition:Wavele...
By definition, a [[Definition:Harmonic Wave|harmonic wave]] is an instance of a [[Definition:Periodic Wave|periodic wave]]. Hence [[Period of Periodic Wave]] can be used directly. {{qed}}
Period of Harmonic Wave/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Period_of_Harmonic_Wave
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Period_of_Harmonic_Wave/Proof_1
[ "Period of Harmonic Wave", "Harmonic Waves" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Wave", "Definition:Harmonic Wave/Period", "Definition:Harmonic Wave/Wavelength" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Wave", "Definition:Periodic Wave", "Period of Periodic Wave" ]
proofwiki-20477
Period of Harmonic Wave
Let $\phi$ be a harmonic wave expressed as: :$\forall x, t \in \R: \map \phi {x, t} = a \map \cos {\omega \paren {x - c t} }$ The '''period''' $\tau$ of $\phi$ can be expressed as: :$\tau = \dfrac \lambda c$ where $\lambda$ is the wavelength of $\phi$.
By definition, $\tau$ is the time taken for one complete wavelength of $\phi$ to pass an arbitrary point on the $x$-axis. From Equation of Harmonic Wave, we have: :$(1): \quad \map \phi {x, t} = a \map \cos {\omega \paren {x - c t} }$ From Wavelength of Harmonic Wave: :$\lambda = \dfrac {2 \pi} \omega$ Hence: :$\omega ...
Let $\phi$ be a [[Definition:Harmonic Wave|harmonic wave]] expressed as: :$\forall x, t \in \R: \map \phi {x, t} = a \map \cos {\omega \paren {x - c t} }$ The '''[[Definition:Period of Harmonic Wave|period]]''' $\tau$ of $\phi$ can be expressed as: :$\tau = \dfrac \lambda c$ where $\lambda$ is the [[Definition:Wavele...
By definition, $\tau$ is the [[Definition:Time|time]] taken for one complete [[Definition:Wavelength of Harmonic Wave|wavelength]] of $\phi$ to pass an arbitrary [[Definition:Point|point]] on the [[Definition:X-Axis|$x$-axis]]. From [[Equation of Harmonic Wave]], we have: :$(1): \quad \map \phi {x, t} = a \map \cos {...
Period of Harmonic Wave/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Period_of_Harmonic_Wave
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Period_of_Harmonic_Wave/Proof_2
[ "Period of Harmonic Wave", "Harmonic Waves" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Wave", "Definition:Harmonic Wave/Period", "Definition:Harmonic Wave/Wavelength" ]
[ "Definition:Time", "Definition:Harmonic Wave/Wavelength", "Definition:Point", "Definition:Axis/X-Axis", "Equation of Harmonic Wave", "Wavelength of Harmonic Wave" ]
proofwiki-20478
Frequency of Harmonic Wave
Let $\phi$ be a harmonic wave expressed as: :$\forall x, t \in \R: \map \phi {x, t} = a \map \cos {\omega \paren {x - c t} }$ The '''frequency''' $\nu$ of $\phi$ can be expressed as: :$\nu = \dfrac 1 \tau$ where $\tau$ is the period of $\phi$.
By definition, a harmonic wave is an instance of a periodic wave. Hence Frequency of Periodic Wave can be used directly. {{qed}}
Let $\phi$ be a [[Definition:Harmonic Wave|harmonic wave]] expressed as: :$\forall x, t \in \R: \map \phi {x, t} = a \map \cos {\omega \paren {x - c t} }$ The '''[[Definition:Frequency of Harmonic Wave|frequency]]''' $\nu$ of $\phi$ can be expressed as: :$\nu = \dfrac 1 \tau$ where $\tau$ is the [[Definition:Period o...
By definition, a [[Definition:Harmonic Wave|harmonic wave]] is an instance of a [[Definition:Periodic Wave|periodic wave]]. Hence [[Frequency of Periodic Wave]] can be used directly. {{qed}}
Frequency of Harmonic Wave/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Frequency_of_Harmonic_Wave
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Frequency_of_Harmonic_Wave/Proof_1
[ "Frequency of Harmonic Wave", "Frequency", "Harmonic Waves" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Wave", "Definition:Harmonic Wave/Frequency", "Definition:Harmonic Wave/Period" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Wave", "Definition:Periodic Wave", "Frequency of Periodic Wave" ]
proofwiki-20479
Velocity of Harmonic Wave is Wavelength times Frequency
Let $\phi$ be a harmonic wave expressed as: :$\forall x, t \in \R: \map \phi {x, t} = a \map \cos {\omega \paren {x - c t} }$ where $c$ is the velocity of $\phi$. Then: :$c = \nu \lambda$ where: :$\nu$ is the frequency of $\phi$ :$\lambda$ is the wavelength of $\phi$.
By definition, a harmonic wave is an instance of a periodic wave. Hence Velocity of Periodic Wave is Wavelength times Frequency can be used directly.
Let $\phi$ be a [[Definition:Harmonic Wave|harmonic wave]] expressed as: :$\forall x, t \in \R: \map \phi {x, t} = a \map \cos {\omega \paren {x - c t} }$ where $c$ is the [[Definition:Velocity|velocity]] of $\phi$. Then: :$c = \nu \lambda$ where: :$\nu$ is the [[Definition:Frequency of Harmonic Wave|frequency]] of $...
By definition, a [[Definition:Harmonic Wave|harmonic wave]] is an instance of a [[Definition:Periodic Wave|periodic wave]]. Hence [[Velocity of Periodic Wave is Wavelength times Frequency]] can be used directly.
Velocity of Harmonic Wave is Wavelength times Frequency/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Velocity_of_Harmonic_Wave_is_Wavelength_times_Frequency
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Velocity_of_Harmonic_Wave_is_Wavelength_times_Frequency/Proof_1
[ "Velocity of Harmonic Wave is Wavelength times Frequency", "Velocity of Periodic Wave is Wavelength times Frequency", "Harmonic Waves" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Wave", "Definition:Velocity", "Definition:Harmonic Wave/Frequency", "Definition:Harmonic Wave/Wavelength" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Wave", "Definition:Periodic Wave", "Velocity of Periodic Wave is Wavelength times Frequency" ]
proofwiki-20480
Equation of Harmonic Wave/Wavelength and Period
:$\map \phi {x, t} = a \map \cos {2 \pi \paren {\dfrac x \lambda - \dfrac t \tau} }$ where: :$\lambda$ is the wavelength of $\phi$ :$\tau$ is the period of $\phi$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \phi {x, t} | r = a \map \cos {\dfrac {2 \pi} \lambda \paren {x - c t} } | c = Equation of Harmonic Wave in terms of Wavelength and Velocity }} {{eqn | r = a \map \cos {\dfrac {2 \pi} \lambda \paren {x - \dfrac \lambda \tau t} } | c = Period of Harmonic Wave: $\tau = \df...
:$\map \phi {x, t} = a \map \cos {2 \pi \paren {\dfrac x \lambda - \dfrac t \tau} }$ where: :$\lambda$ is the [[Definition:Wavelength of Harmonic Wave|wavelength]] of $\phi$ :$\tau$ is the [[Definition:Period of Harmonic Wave|period]] of $\phi$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \phi {x, t} | r = a \map \cos {\dfrac {2 \pi} \lambda \paren {x - c t} } | c = [[Equation of Harmonic Wave/Wavelength and Velocity|Equation of Harmonic Wave in terms of Wavelength and Velocity]] }} {{eqn | r = a \map \cos {\dfrac {2 \pi} \lambda \paren {x - \dfrac \lambda \tau...
Equation of Harmonic Wave/Wavelength and Period
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equation_of_Harmonic_Wave/Wavelength_and_Period
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equation_of_Harmonic_Wave/Wavelength_and_Period
[ "Equation of Harmonic Wave" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Wave/Wavelength", "Definition:Harmonic Wave/Period" ]
[ "Equation of Harmonic Wave/Wavelength and Velocity", "Period of Harmonic Wave" ]
proofwiki-20481
Equation of Harmonic Wave/Wavelength and Frequency
:$\map \phi {x, t} = a \map \cos {2 \pi \paren {\dfrac x \lambda - \nu t} }$ where: :$\lambda$ is the wavelength of $\phi$ :$\nu$ is the frequency of $\phi$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \phi {x, t} | r = a \map \cos {2 \pi \paren {\dfrac x \lambda - \dfrac t \tau} } | c = Equation of Harmonic Wave in terms of Wavelength and Period: $\tau$ is the period of $\phi$ }} {{eqn | r = a \map \cos {2 \pi \paren {\dfrac x \lambda - \dfrac 1 \tau t} } | c = rearra...
:$\map \phi {x, t} = a \map \cos {2 \pi \paren {\dfrac x \lambda - \nu t} }$ where: :$\lambda$ is the [[Definition:Wavelength of Harmonic Wave|wavelength]] of $\phi$ :$\nu$ is the [[Definition:Frequency of Harmonic Wave|frequency]] of $\phi$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \phi {x, t} | r = a \map \cos {2 \pi \paren {\dfrac x \lambda - \dfrac t \tau} } | c = [[Equation of Harmonic Wave/Wavelength and Period|Equation of Harmonic Wave in terms of Wavelength and Period]]: $\tau$ is the [[Definition:Period of Harmonic Wave|period]] of $\phi$ }} {{eq...
Equation of Harmonic Wave/Wavelength and Frequency
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equation_of_Harmonic_Wave/Wavelength_and_Frequency
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equation_of_Harmonic_Wave/Wavelength_and_Frequency
[ "Equation of Harmonic Wave" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Wave/Wavelength", "Definition:Harmonic Wave/Frequency" ]
[ "Equation of Harmonic Wave/Wavelength and Period", "Definition:Harmonic Wave/Period", "Frequency of Harmonic Wave" ]
proofwiki-20482
Equation of Harmonic Wave/Wavelength and Velocity
:$\map \phi {x, t} = a \map \cos {\dfrac {2 \pi} \lambda \paren {x - c t} }$ where $\lambda$ is the wavelength of $\phi$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \phi {x, t} | r = a \map \cos {\omega \paren {x - c t} } | c = Equation of Harmonic Wave }} {{eqn | r = a \map \cos {\dfrac {2 \pi} \lambda \paren {x - c t} } | c = Wavelength of Harmonic Wave: $\lambda = \dfrac {2 \pi} \omega$ }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
:$\map \phi {x, t} = a \map \cos {\dfrac {2 \pi} \lambda \paren {x - c t} }$ where $\lambda$ is the [[Definition:Wavelength of Harmonic Wave|wavelength]] of $\phi$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \phi {x, t} | r = a \map \cos {\omega \paren {x - c t} } | c = [[Equation of Harmonic Wave]] }} {{eqn | r = a \map \cos {\dfrac {2 \pi} \lambda \paren {x - c t} } | c = [[Wavelength of Harmonic Wave]]: $\lambda = \dfrac {2 \pi} \omega$ }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
Equation of Harmonic Wave/Wavelength and Velocity
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equation_of_Harmonic_Wave/Wavelength_and_Velocity
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equation_of_Harmonic_Wave/Wavelength_and_Velocity
[ "Equation of Harmonic Wave" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Wave/Wavelength" ]
[ "Equation of Harmonic Wave", "Wavelength of Harmonic Wave" ]
proofwiki-20483
Wave Number of Harmonic Wave
Let $\phi$ be a harmonic wave expressed as: :$\forall x, t \in \R: \map \phi {x, t} = a \map \cos {\omega \paren {x - c t} }$ The '''wave number''' $k$ of $\phi$ can be expressed as: :$k = \dfrac 1 \lambda$ where $\lambda$ is the wavelength of $\phi$.
By definition, a harmonic wave is an instance of a periodic wave. Hence Wave Number of Periodic Wave can be used directly. {{qed}}
Let $\phi$ be a [[Definition:Harmonic Wave|harmonic wave]] expressed as: :$\forall x, t \in \R: \map \phi {x, t} = a \map \cos {\omega \paren {x - c t} }$ The '''[[Definition:Wave Number of Harmonic Wave|wave number]]''' $k$ of $\phi$ can be expressed as: :$k = \dfrac 1 \lambda$ where $\lambda$ is the [[Definition:Wa...
By definition, a [[Definition:Harmonic Wave|harmonic wave]] is an instance of a [[Definition:Periodic Wave|periodic wave]]. Hence [[Wave Number of Periodic Wave]] can be used directly. {{qed}}
Wave Number of Harmonic Wave/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Wave_Number_of_Harmonic_Wave
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Wave_Number_of_Harmonic_Wave/Proof_1
[ "Wave Number of Harmonic Wave", "Wave Number", "Harmonic Waves" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Wave", "Definition:Harmonic Wave/Wave Number", "Definition:Harmonic Wave/Wavelength" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Wave", "Definition:Periodic Wave", "Wave Number of Periodic Wave" ]
proofwiki-20484
Wave Number of Harmonic Wave
Let $\phi$ be a harmonic wave expressed as: :$\forall x, t \in \R: \map \phi {x, t} = a \map \cos {\omega \paren {x - c t} }$ The '''wave number''' $k$ of $\phi$ can be expressed as: :$k = \dfrac 1 \lambda$ where $\lambda$ is the wavelength of $\phi$.
By definition, $k$ is the number of complete wavelengths of $\phi$ per unit displacement along the $x$-axis. By definition, $\lambda$ is the period of the wave profile of $\phi$. So between two points at unit distance apart, there are $\dfrac 1 \lambda$ wavelengths of $\phi$. The result follows by definition of wave nu...
Let $\phi$ be a [[Definition:Harmonic Wave|harmonic wave]] expressed as: :$\forall x, t \in \R: \map \phi {x, t} = a \map \cos {\omega \paren {x - c t} }$ The '''[[Definition:Wave Number of Harmonic Wave|wave number]]''' $k$ of $\phi$ can be expressed as: :$k = \dfrac 1 \lambda$ where $\lambda$ is the [[Definition:Wa...
By definition, $k$ is the number of complete [[Definition:Wavelength of Harmonic Wave|wavelengths]] of $\phi$ per unit [[Definition:Displacement|displacement]] along the [[Definition:X-Axis|$x$-axis]]. By definition, $\lambda$ is the [[Definition:Period of Periodic Real Function|period]] of the [[Definition:Wave Profi...
Wave Number of Harmonic Wave/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Wave_Number_of_Harmonic_Wave
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Wave_Number_of_Harmonic_Wave/Proof_2
[ "Wave Number of Harmonic Wave", "Wave Number", "Harmonic Waves" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Wave", "Definition:Harmonic Wave/Wave Number", "Definition:Harmonic Wave/Wavelength" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Wave/Wavelength", "Definition:Displacement", "Definition:Axis/X-Axis", "Definition:Periodic Real Function/Period", "Definition:Wave Profile", "Definition:Point", "Definition:Distance between Points", "Definition:Harmonic Wave/Wavelength", "Definition:Harmonic Wave/Wave Number" ]
proofwiki-20485
Equation of Harmonic Wave/Wave Number and Frequency
:$\map \phi {x, t} = a \map \cos {2 \pi \paren {k x - \nu t} }$ where: :$k$ is the wave number of $\phi$ :$\nu$ is the frequency of $\phi$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \phi {x, t} | r = a \map \cos {2 \pi \paren {\dfrac x \lambda - \nu t} } | c = Equation of Harmonic Wave in terms of Wavelength and Frequency: $\lambda$ is the wavelength of $\phi$ }} {{eqn | r = a \map \cos {2 \pi \paren {\dfrac 1 \lambda x - \nu t} } | c = rearranging ...
:$\map \phi {x, t} = a \map \cos {2 \pi \paren {k x - \nu t} }$ where: :$k$ is the [[Definition:Wave Number of Harmonic Wave|wave number]] of $\phi$ :$\nu$ is the [[Definition:Frequency of Harmonic Wave|frequency]] of $\phi$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \phi {x, t} | r = a \map \cos {2 \pi \paren {\dfrac x \lambda - \nu t} } | c = [[Equation of Harmonic Wave/Wavelength and Frequency|Equation of Harmonic Wave in terms of Wavelength and Frequency]]: $\lambda$ is the [[Definition:Wavelength of Harmonic Wave|wavelength]] of $\phi...
Equation of Harmonic Wave/Wave Number and Frequency
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equation_of_Harmonic_Wave/Wave_Number_and_Frequency
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equation_of_Harmonic_Wave/Wave_Number_and_Frequency
[ "Equation of Harmonic Wave" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Wave/Wave Number", "Definition:Harmonic Wave/Frequency" ]
[ "Equation of Harmonic Wave/Wavelength and Frequency", "Definition:Harmonic Wave/Wavelength", "Wave Number of Harmonic Wave" ]
proofwiki-20486
Period of Periodic Wave
Let $\phi$ be a periodic wave expressed as: :$\forall x, t \in \R: \map \phi {x, t} = \map f {x - c t}$ The '''period''' $\tau$ of $\phi$ can be expressed as: :$\tau = \dfrac \lambda c$ where $\lambda$ is the wavelength of $\phi$.
By definition, $\tau$ is the time taken for one complete wavelength of $\phi$ to pass an arbitrary point on the $x$-axis. We have: :$\map \phi {x, t} = \map f {x - c t} = \map f {x - c t + \lambda}$ It follows that $x - c t$ must pass through a complete cycle of values as $t$ is increased by $\tau$. Thus: :$\lambda = c...
Let $\phi$ be a [[Definition:Periodic Wave|periodic wave]] expressed as: :$\forall x, t \in \R: \map \phi {x, t} = \map f {x - c t}$ The '''[[Definition:Period of Periodic Wave|period]]''' $\tau$ of $\phi$ can be expressed as: :$\tau = \dfrac \lambda c$ where $\lambda$ is the [[Definition:Wavelength of Periodic Wave|...
By definition, $\tau$ is the [[Definition:Time|time]] taken for one complete [[Definition:Wavelength of Periodic Wave|wavelength]] of $\phi$ to pass an arbitrary [[Definition:Point|point]] on the [[Definition:X-Axis|$x$-axis]]. We have: :$\map \phi {x, t} = \map f {x - c t} = \map f {x - c t + \lambda}$ It follows t...
Period of Periodic Wave
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Period_of_Periodic_Wave
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Period_of_Periodic_Wave
[ "Period of Periodic Wave", "Periodic Waves" ]
[ "Definition:Periodic Wave", "Definition:Periodic Wave/Period", "Definition:Periodic Wave/Wavelength" ]
[ "Definition:Time", "Definition:Periodic Wave/Wavelength", "Definition:Point", "Definition:Axis/X-Axis" ]
proofwiki-20487
Frequency of Periodic Wave
Let $\phi$ be a periodic wave expressed as: :$\forall x, t \in \R: \map \phi {x, t} = \map f {x - c t}$ The '''frequency''' $\nu$ of $\phi$ can be expressed as: :$\nu = \dfrac 1 \tau$ where $\tau$ is the period of $\phi$.
By definition, $\nu$ is the number of complete '''wavelengths''' of $\phi$ to pass an arbitrary point on the $x$-axis in unit time. Let $x_0$ be that arbitrary point. By definition, $\tau$ is the time taken for one complete wavelength of $\phi$ to pass $x_0$. So after unit time, $\dfrac 1 \tau$ wavelengths of $\phi$ pa...
Let $\phi$ be a [[Definition:Periodic Wave|periodic wave]] expressed as: :$\forall x, t \in \R: \map \phi {x, t} = \map f {x - c t}$ The '''[[Definition:Frequency of Periodic Wave|frequency]]''' $\nu$ of $\phi$ can be expressed as: :$\nu = \dfrac 1 \tau$ where $\tau$ is the [[Definition:Period of Periodic Wave|period...
By definition, $\nu$ is the number of complete '''[[Definition:Wavelength of Periodic Wave|wavelengths]]''' of $\phi$ to pass an arbitrary [[Definition:Point|point]] on the [[Definition:X-Axis|$x$-axis]] in unit [[Definition:Time|time]]. Let $x_0$ be that arbitrary [[Definition:Point|point]]. By definition, $\tau$ is...
Frequency of Periodic Wave
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Frequency_of_Periodic_Wave
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Frequency_of_Periodic_Wave
[ "Frequency of Periodic Wave", "Frequency", "Periodic Waves" ]
[ "Definition:Periodic Wave", "Definition:Periodic Wave/Frequency", "Definition:Periodic Wave/Period" ]
[ "Definition:Periodic Wave/Wavelength", "Definition:Point", "Definition:Axis/X-Axis", "Definition:Time", "Definition:Point", "Definition:Time", "Definition:Periodic Wave/Wavelength", "Definition:Time", "Definition:Periodic Wave/Wavelength" ]
proofwiki-20488
Velocity of Periodic Wave is Wavelength times Frequency
Let $\phi$ be a periodic wave expressed as: :$\forall x, t \in \R: \map \phi {x, t} = \map f {x - c t}$ where $c$ is the velocity of $\phi$. Then: :$c = \nu \lambda$ where: :$\nu$ is the frequency of $\phi$ :$\lambda$ is the wavelength of $\phi$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \tau | r = \dfrac \lambda c | c = Period of Periodic Wave, where $\tau$ is the period of $\phi$ }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = c | r = \dfrac 1 \tau \times \lambda | c = algebra }} {{eqn | r = \nu \lambda | c = Frequency of Periodic Wave }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}...
Let $\phi$ be a [[Definition:Periodic Wave|periodic wave]] expressed as: :$\forall x, t \in \R: \map \phi {x, t} = \map f {x - c t}$ where $c$ is the [[Definition:Velocity|velocity]] of $\phi$. Then: :$c = \nu \lambda$ where: :$\nu$ is the [[Definition:Frequency of Periodic Wave|frequency]] of $\phi$ :$\lambda$ is th...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \tau | r = \dfrac \lambda c | c = [[Period of Periodic Wave]], where $\tau$ is the [[Definition:Period of Periodic Wave|period]] of $\phi$ }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = c | r = \dfrac 1 \tau \times \lambda | c = algebra }} {{eqn | r = \nu \lambda | c = [[Fre...
Velocity of Periodic Wave is Wavelength times Frequency
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Velocity_of_Periodic_Wave_is_Wavelength_times_Frequency
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Velocity_of_Periodic_Wave_is_Wavelength_times_Frequency
[ "Periodic Waves" ]
[ "Definition:Periodic Wave", "Definition:Velocity", "Definition:Periodic Wave/Frequency", "Definition:Periodic Wave/Wavelength" ]
[ "Period of Periodic Wave", "Definition:Periodic Wave/Period", "Frequency of Periodic Wave" ]
proofwiki-20489
Wave Number of Periodic Wave
Let $\phi$ be a periodic wave expressed as: :$\forall x, t \in \R: \map \phi {x, t} = \map f {x - c t}$ The '''wave number''' $k$ of $\phi$ can be expressed as: :$k = \dfrac 1 \lambda$ where $\lambda$ is the wavelength of $\phi$.
By definition, $k$ is the number of complete wavelengths of $\phi$ per unit displacement along the $x$-axis. By definition, $\lambda$ is the period of the wave profile of $\phi$. So between two points at unit distance apart, there are $\dfrac 1 \lambda$ wavelengths of $\phi$. The result follows by definition of wave nu...
Let $\phi$ be a [[Definition:Periodic Wave|periodic wave]] expressed as: :$\forall x, t \in \R: \map \phi {x, t} = \map f {x - c t}$ The '''[[Definition:Wave Number of Periodic Wave|wave number]]''' $k$ of $\phi$ can be expressed as: :$k = \dfrac 1 \lambda$ where $\lambda$ is the [[Definition:Wavelength of Periodic W...
By definition, $k$ is the number of complete [[Definition:Wavelength of Periodic Wave|wavelengths]] of $\phi$ per unit [[Definition:Displacement|displacement]] along the [[Definition:X-Axis|$x$-axis]]. By definition, $\lambda$ is the [[Definition:Period of Periodic Real Function|period]] of the [[Definition:Wave Profi...
Wave Number of Periodic Wave
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Wave_Number_of_Periodic_Wave
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Wave_Number_of_Periodic_Wave
[ "Wave Number of Periodic Wave", "Wave Number", "Periodic Waves" ]
[ "Definition:Periodic Wave", "Definition:Periodic Wave/Wave Number", "Definition:Periodic Wave/Wavelength" ]
[ "Definition:Periodic Wave/Wavelength", "Definition:Displacement", "Definition:Axis/X-Axis", "Definition:Periodic Real Function/Period", "Definition:Wave Profile", "Definition:Point", "Definition:Distance between Points", "Definition:Periodic Wave/Wavelength", "Definition:Periodic Wave/Wave Number" ]
proofwiki-20490
Closed Subspace of Lindelöf Space is Lindelöf Space
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a Lindelöf space. Let $C = \struct {H, \tau_H}$ be a subspace of $T$. Let $C$ be closed in $T$. Then $\struct {H, \tau}$ is Lindelöf space. That is, the property of being Lindelöf is weakly hereditary.
Let $T$ be a Lindelöf space. Let $C$ be a closed subspace of $T$. Let $\UU$ be an open cover of $H$. We have that $H$ is closed in $T$. It follows by definition of closed that $H \setminus C$ is open in $T$. So if we add $S \setminus H$ to $\UU$, we see that: :$\UU \cup \set {S \setminus H}$ is also an open cover of $...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Lindelöf Space|Lindelöf space]]. Let $C = \struct {H, \tau_H}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Subspace|subspace]] of $T$. Let $C$ be [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]] in $T$. Then $\struct {H, \tau}$ is [[Definition:Lindelöf Space|Lindelöf space]]. That is, t...
Let $T$ be a [[Definition:Lindelöf Space|Lindelöf space]]. Let $C$ be a [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]] [[Definition:Topological Subspace|subspace]] of $T$. Let $\UU$ be an [[Definition:Open Cover|open cover]] of $H$. We have that $H$ is [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]] in $T$. It follows by...
Closed Subspace of Lindelöf Space is Lindelöf Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closed_Subspace_of_Lindelöf_Space_is_Lindelöf_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closed_Subspace_of_Lindelöf_Space_is_Lindelöf_Space
[ "Lindelöf Spaces", "Examples of Weakly Hereditary Properties" ]
[ "Definition:Lindelöf Space", "Definition:Topological Subspace", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Lindelöf Space", "Definition:Property", "Definition:Lindelöf Space", "Definition:Weakly Hereditary Property" ]
[ "Definition:Lindelöf Space", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Topological Subspace", "Definition:Open Cover", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Open Cover", "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Definitio...
proofwiki-20491
Bounded Real-Valued Linear Functional is Real Part of Unique Bounded Complex-Valued Linear Functional
Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be a normed vector space over $\C$. Let $\struct {X_\R, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_\R}$ be the realification of $X$ equipped with the restricted norm. Let $f : X_\R \to \R$ be a bounded linear functional. Then there exists a unique bounded linear functional $g : X \to \C$ such that: ...
Let $M > 0$ be such that: :$\cmod {\map f x} \le M \norm x$ for each $x \in X$. From Linear Functional on Complex Vector Space is Uniquely Determined by Real Part, there exists a unique linear functional $g : X \to \C$ such that: :$\map f x = \map \Re {\map g x}$ for each $x \in X$, given by: :$\map g x = \map f x...
Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be a [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector space]] over $\C$. Let $\struct {X_\R, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_\R}$ be the [[Definition:Realification of Complex Vector Space|realification]] of $X$ equipped with the [[Definition:Restriction of Mapping|restricted]] [[Definition:No...
Let $M > 0$ be such that: :$\cmod {\map f x} \le M \norm x$ for each $x \in X$. From [[Linear Functional on Complex Vector Space is Uniquely Determined by Real Part]], there exists a unique [[Definition:Linear Functional|linear functional]] $g : X \to \C$ such that: :$\map f x = \map \Re {\map g x}$ for each $...
Bounded Real-Valued Linear Functional is Real Part of Unique Bounded Complex-Valued Linear Functional
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Bounded_Real-Valued_Linear_Functional_is_Real_Part_of_Unique_Bounded_Complex-Valued_Linear_Functional
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Bounded_Real-Valued_Linear_Functional_is_Real_Part_of_Unique_Bounded_Complex-Valued_Linear_Functional
[ "Bounded Linear Functionals" ]
[ "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Realification of Complex Vector Space", "Definition:Restriction/Mapping", "Definition:Norm/Vector Space", "Definition:Bounded Linear Functional", "Definition:Bounded Linear Functional" ]
[ "Linear Functional on Complex Vector Space is Uniquely Determined by Real Part", "Definition:Linear Functional", "Definition:Bounded Linear Functional", "Definition:Bounded Linear Functional", "Category:Bounded Linear Functionals" ]
proofwiki-20492
Hahn-Banach Separation Theorem/Normed Vector Space/Complex Case/Open Convex Set and Convex Set
Let $A \subseteq X$ be an open convex set. Let $B \subseteq X$ be a convex set disjoint from $A$. Then there exists $f \in X^\ast$ and $c \in \R$ such that: :$A \subseteq \set {x \in X : \map \Re {\map f x} < c}$ and: :$B \subseteq \set {x \in X : \map \Re {\map f x} \ge c}$ That is: :there exists $f \in X^\ast$ and...
Let $\struct {X_\R, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_\R}$ be the realification of $X$ equipped with the restricted norm. Applying Hahn-Banach Separation Theorem: Real Case: Open Convex Set and Convex Set to $\struct {X_\R, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_\R}$, there exists a bounded linear functional $g : X_\R \to \R$ and $c \in \R$ such tha...
Let $A \subseteq X$ be an [[Definition:Open Set in Normed Vector Space|open]] [[Definition:Convex Set (Vector Space)|convex set]]. Let $B \subseteq X$ be a [[Definition:Convex Set (Vector Space)|convex set]] [[Definition:Disjoint Sets|disjoint]] from $A$. Then there exists $f \in X^\ast$ and $c \in \R$ such that: ...
Let $\struct {X_\R, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_\R}$ be the [[Definition:Realification of Complex Vector Space|realification]] of $X$ equipped with the [[Definition:Restriction of Mapping|restricted]] [[Definition:Norm on Vector Space|norm]]. Applying [[Hahn-Banach Separation Theorem/Real Case/Open Convex Set and Convex Set...
Hahn-Banach Separation Theorem/Normed Vector Space/Complex Case/Open Convex Set and Convex Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hahn-Banach_Separation_Theorem/Normed_Vector_Space/Complex_Case/Open_Convex_Set_and_Convex_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hahn-Banach_Separation_Theorem/Normed_Vector_Space/Complex_Case/Open_Convex_Set_and_Convex_Set
[ "Hahn-Banach Separation Theorem" ]
[ "Definition:Open Set/Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Convex Set (Vector Space)", "Definition:Convex Set (Vector Space)", "Definition:Disjoint Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Realification of Complex Vector Space", "Definition:Restriction/Mapping", "Definition:Norm/Vector Space", "Hahn-Banach Separation Theorem/Normed Vector Space/Real Case/Open Convex Set and Convex Set", "Definition:Bounded Linear Functional", "Bounded Real-Valued Linear Functional is Real Part o...
proofwiki-20493
Hahn-Banach Separation Theorem/Normed Vector Space/Complex Case/Compact Convex Set and Closed Convex Set
Let $A$ be a compact convex set. Let $B$ be a closed convex set disjoint from $A$. Then there exists $f \in X^\ast$, $c \in \R$ and $\epsilon > 0$ such that: :$A \subseteq \set {x \in X : \map \Re {\map f x} \le c - \epsilon}$ and: :$B \subseteq \set {x \in X : \map \Re {\map f x} \ge c + \epsilon}$ That is: :there e...
Let $\struct {X_\R, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_\R}$ be the realification of $X$ equipped with the restricted norm. Applying Hahn-Banach Separation Theorem: Real Case: Open Convex Set and Convex Set to $\struct {X_\R, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_\R}$, there exists a bounded linear functional $g : X_\R \to \R$, $c \in \R$ and $\epsil...
Let $A$ be a [[Definition:Compact Subset of Normed Vector Space|compact]] [[Definition:Convex Set (Vector Space)|convex set]]. Let $B$ be a [[Definition:Closed Set in Normed Vector Space|closed]] [[Definition:Convex Set (Vector Space)|convex set]] [[Definition:Disjoint Sets|disjoint]] from $A$. Then there exists $f ...
Let $\struct {X_\R, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_\R}$ be the [[Definition:Realification of Complex Vector Space|realification]] of $X$ equipped with the [[Definition:Restriction of Mapping|restricted]] [[Definition:Norm on Vector Space|norm]]. Applying [[Hahn-Banach Separation Theorem/Real Case/Open Convex Set and Convex Set...
Hahn-Banach Separation Theorem/Normed Vector Space/Complex Case/Compact Convex Set and Closed Convex Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hahn-Banach_Separation_Theorem/Normed_Vector_Space/Complex_Case/Compact_Convex_Set_and_Closed_Convex_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hahn-Banach_Separation_Theorem/Normed_Vector_Space/Complex_Case/Compact_Convex_Set_and_Closed_Convex_Set
[ "Hahn-Banach Separation Theorem" ]
[ "Definition:Compact Space/Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Convex Set (Vector Space)", "Definition:Closed Set/Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Convex Set (Vector Space)", "Definition:Disjoint Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Realification of Complex Vector Space", "Definition:Restriction/Mapping", "Definition:Norm/Vector Space", "Hahn-Banach Separation Theorem/Normed Vector Space/Real Case/Open Convex Set and Convex Set", "Definition:Bounded Linear Functional", "Bounded Real-Valued Linear Functional is Real Part o...
proofwiki-20494
Sum of Consecutive Odd Index Fibonacci Numbers
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = F_{2 k - 1} + F_{2 k + 1} | r = \phi^{2 k} + \phi^{-2 k} | c = }} {{end-eqn}} where: :$F_k$ denotes the $k$th Fibonacci number :$\phi$ denotes the golden mean.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = F_{2 k - 1} + F_{2 k + 1} | r = \paren {\phi^{2 k} - F_{2 k} \phi } + \paren {\phi^{2 k + 2} - F_{2 k + 2} \phi } | c = Fibonacci Number by Golden Mean plus Fibonacci Number of Index One Less }} {{eqn | r = \phi^{2 k} + F_{-2 k} \phi + \paren {\phi^{2 k + 2} - F_{2 k + 2} \phi } ...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = F_{2 k - 1} + F_{2 k + 1} | r = \phi^{2 k} + \phi^{-2 k} | c = }} {{end-eqn}} where: :$F_k$ denotes the $k$th [[Definition:Fibonacci Number|Fibonacci number]] :$\phi$ denotes the [[Definition:Golden Mean|golden mean]].
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = F_{2 k - 1} + F_{2 k + 1} | r = \paren {\phi^{2 k} - F_{2 k} \phi } + \paren {\phi^{2 k + 2} - F_{2 k + 2} \phi } | c = [[Fibonacci Number by Golden Mean plus Fibonacci Number of Index One Less]] }} {{eqn | r = \phi^{2 k} + F_{-2 k} \phi + \paren {\phi^{2 k + 2} - F_{2 k + 2} \phi ...
Sum of Consecutive Odd Index Fibonacci Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Consecutive_Odd_Index_Fibonacci_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Consecutive_Odd_Index_Fibonacci_Numbers
[ "Fibonacci Numbers", "Golden Mean" ]
[ "Definition:Fibonacci Number", "Definition:Golden Mean" ]
[ "Fibonacci Number by Golden Mean plus Fibonacci Number of Index One Less", "Fibonacci Number with Negative Index", "Fibonacci Number by Golden Mean plus Fibonacci Number of Index One Less", "Fibonacci Number with Negative Index", "Fibonacci Number by Golden Mean plus Fibonacci Number of Index One Less", "...
proofwiki-20495
Continuous Linear Transformation Algebra has Two-Sided Identity
Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_X}$ be a normed vector space. Let $\map {CL} X := \map {CL} {X, X}$ be a continuous linear transformation space. Let $\struct {\map {CL} X, *}$ be an associative algebra. Then there exists an identity element $I \in \map {CL} X$ such that: :$\forall x \in X : \map I x = x$
{{ProofWanted}} {{tidy|the usual}} Let $X$ be normed vector space over $K$. Let $\map \LL {X, X}$ denote the set of all linear transformations from $X$ to itself. Let $\map C {X, X}$ denote the continuous mapping space from $X$ to itself. Suppose: :$\map {CL} X := \map {CL} {X, X}$ Since $\struct {\map {CL} X, *}$ is a...
Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_X}$ be a [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector space]]. Let $\map {CL} X := \map {CL} {X, X}$ be a [[Definition:Continuous Linear Transformation Space|continuous linear transformation space]]. Let $\struct {\map {CL} X, *}$ be an [[Definition:Associative Algebra|associati...
{{ProofWanted}} {{tidy|the usual}} Let $X$ be [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector space]] over $K$. Let $\map \LL {X, X}$ denote the [[Definition:Set of All Linear Transformations|set of all linear transformations]] from $X$ to itself. Let $\map C {X, X}$ denote the [[Definition:Continuous Mapping Space...
Continuous Linear Transformation Algebra has Two-Sided Identity
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Linear_Transformation_Algebra_has_Two-Sided_Identity
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Linear_Transformation_Algebra_has_Two-Sided_Identity
[]
[ "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Continuous Linear Transformation Space", "Definition:Associative Algebra", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity" ]
[ "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Set of All Linear Transformations", "Definition:Continuous Mapping Space", "Definition:Associative Algebra", "Identity Mapping is Continuous", "Identity Mapping on Normed Vector Space is Bounded Linear Operator", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-S...
proofwiki-20496
Continuous Linear Transformation Algebra with Supremum Operator Norm is Normed Algebra
Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_X}$ be a normed vector space. Let $\map {CL} X := \map {CL} {X, X}$ be a continuous linear transformation space. Let $\struct {\map {CL} X, *}$ be an associative algebra. Let $\norm {\, \cdot \,}$ be the supremum operator norm. Then $\struct {\struct {\map {CL} X, *}, \norm {\, \cdo...
We need to show: $\norm {a \ast b} \le \norm a \norm b$ {{questionable|Is this really true for any associative bilinear $\ast$? }} {{ProofWanted}}
Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_X}$ be a [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector space]]. Let $\map {CL} X := \map {CL} {X, X}$ be a [[Definition:Continuous Linear Transformation Space|continuous linear transformation space]]. Let $\struct {\map {CL} X, *}$ be an [[Definition:Associative Algebra|associati...
We need to show: $\norm {a \ast b} \le \norm a \norm b$ {{questionable|Is this really true for any associative bilinear $\ast$? }} {{ProofWanted}}
Continuous Linear Transformation Algebra with Supremum Operator Norm is Normed Algebra
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Linear_Transformation_Algebra_with_Supremum_Operator_Norm_is_Normed_Algebra
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Linear_Transformation_Algebra_with_Supremum_Operator_Norm_is_Normed_Algebra
[]
[ "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Continuous Linear Transformation Space", "Definition:Associative Algebra", "Definition:Supremum Operator Norm", "Definition:Normed Algebra" ]
[]
proofwiki-20497
Equation of Wavefront of Plane Wave/Direction Cosine Form
Let $\phi$ be a plane wave. Let an arbitrary wavefront of $\phi$ be denoted $P$. Let the direction of propagation of $\phi$ be expressed as: :$x : y : z = l : m : n$ where $l$, $m$ and $n$ are the direction cosines of the normal to $P$. {{explain|The notation needs to be explained. This will be done on the Definition:D...
{{ProofWanted|More background needed on $3$D analytic / coordinate geometry. I need to crack on with that.}}
Let $\phi$ be a [[Definition:Plane Wave|plane wave]]. Let an arbitrary [[Definition:Wavefront of Plane Wave|wavefront]] of $\phi$ be denoted $P$. Let the [[Definition:Direction of Propagation of Wave|direction of propagation]] of $\phi$ be expressed as: :$x : y : z = l : m : n$ where $l$, $m$ and $n$ are the [[Defini...
{{ProofWanted|More background needed on $3$D analytic / coordinate geometry. I need to crack on with that.}}
Equation of Wavefront of Plane Wave/Direction Cosine Form
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equation_of_Wavefront_of_Plane_Wave/Direction_Cosine_Form
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equation_of_Wavefront_of_Plane_Wave/Direction_Cosine_Form
[ "Equation of Wavefront of Plane Wave" ]
[ "Definition:Plane Wave", "Definition:Plane Wave/Wavefront", "Definition:Wave/Direction of Propagation", "Definition:Direction Cosines", "Definition:Normal Vector", "Definition:Direction Cosines", "Definition:Constant", "Definition:Plane Wave" ]
[]
proofwiki-20498
Equation of Plane Wave/Direction Cosine Form
Let $\phi$ be a plane wave propagated with velocity $c$. Let the direction of propagation of $\phi$ be expressed as: :$x : y : z = l : m : n$ where $l$, $m$ and $n$ are the '''direction cosines''' of the normal to $P$. Then $\phi$ can be expressed as: :$\map \phi {x, y, z, t} = \map f {l x + m y + n z - c t}$
By Equation of Wavefront of Plane Wave, the equation of the wavefront of $\phi$ is given by: :$l x + m y + n z = K$ Hence it is clear that: :$\map \phi {x, y, z, t} = \map f {l x + m y + n z - c t}$ is a function which fulfils all the requirements to be a plane wave. {{handwaving|"It is clear that"}} Hence $\phi$ as de...
Let $\phi$ be a [[Definition:Plane Wave|plane wave]] [[Definition:Direction of Propagation of Wave|propagated]] with [[Definition:Velocity|velocity]] $c$. Let the [[Definition:Direction of Propagation of Wave|direction of propagation]] of $\phi$ be expressed as: :$x : y : z = l : m : n$ where $l$, $m$ and $n$ are the ...
By [[Equation of Wavefront of Plane Wave]], the equation of the [[Definition:Wavefront of Plane Wave|wavefront]] of $\phi$ is given by: :$l x + m y + n z = K$ Hence it is clear that: :$\map \phi {x, y, z, t} = \map f {l x + m y + n z - c t}$ is a [[Definition:Real-Valued Function|function]] which fulfils all the requ...
Equation of Plane Wave/Direction Cosine Form
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equation_of_Plane_Wave/Direction_Cosine_Form
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equation_of_Plane_Wave/Direction_Cosine_Form
[ "Equation of Plane Wave" ]
[ "Definition:Plane Wave", "Definition:Wave/Direction of Propagation", "Definition:Velocity", "Definition:Wave/Direction of Propagation", "Definition:Direction Cosines", "Definition:Normal Vector" ]
[ "Equation of Wavefront of Plane Wave", "Definition:Plane Wave/Wavefront", "Definition:Real-Valued Function", "Definition:Plane Wave", "Definition:Plane Wave", "Definition:Wave/Direction of Propagation", "Definition:Velocity", "Definition:Wave/Direction of Propagation" ]
proofwiki-20499
T3 Lindelöf Space is T4
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a $T_3$ Lindelöf topological space. Then $T$ is a $T_4$ space.
Let $A$ and $B$ be disjoint closed subsets of $T$. Let $\UU = \set {U \in \tau : U^- \cap B = \O}$. From Characterization of T3 Space: :$\forall a \in A : \exists U_a \in \tau: a \in U_a : U_a^- \cap B = \O$ By definition of open cover: :$\UU$ is an open cover of $A$ From Closed Subspace of Lindelöf Space is Lindelöf S...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:T3 Space|$T_3$]] [[Definition:Lindelöf Space|Lindelöf]] [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Then $T$ is a [[Definition:T4 Space|$T_4$ space]].
Let $A$ and $B$ be [[Definition:Disjoint Sets|disjoint]] [[Definition:Closed Subset|closed]] [[Definition:Subset|subsets]] of $T$. Let $\UU = \set {U \in \tau : U^- \cap B = \O}$. From [[Characterization of T3 Space]]: :$\forall a \in A : \exists U_a \in \tau: a \in U_a : U_a^- \cap B = \O$ By definition of [[Defin...
T3 Lindelöf Space is T4/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/T3_Lindelöf_Space_is_T4
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/T3_Lindelöf_Space_is_T4/Proof_1
[ "T3 Spaces", "Lindelöf Spaces", "T4 Spaces", "T3 Lindelöf Space is T4" ]
[ "Definition:T3 Space", "Definition:Lindelöf Space", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:T4 Space" ]
[ "Definition:Disjoint Sets", "Definition:Closed Subset", "Definition:Subset", "Characterization of T3 Space", "Definition:Open Cover", "Definition:Open Cover", "Closed Subspace of Lindelöf Space is Lindelöf Space", "Definition:Lindelöf Space", "Definition:Topological Subspace", "Definition:Topologi...