id
stringlengths
11
15
title
stringlengths
7
171
problem
stringlengths
9
4.33k
solution
stringlengths
6
19k
problem_wikitext
stringlengths
9
4.42k
solution_wikitext
stringlengths
7
19.1k
proof_title
stringlengths
9
171
theorem_url
stringlengths
34
198
proof_url
stringlengths
36
198
categories
listlengths
0
9
theorem_references
listlengths
0
36
proof_references
listlengths
0
253
proofwiki-20500
T3 Lindelöf Space is T4
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a $T_3$ Lindelöf topological space. Then $T$ is a $T_4$ space.
From $T_3$ Lindelöf Space is Fully $T_4$: :$T$ is a fully $T_4$ space. From Fully $T_4$ Space is $T_4$: :$T$ is a $T_4$ space. {{qed}}
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:T3 Space|$T_3$]] [[Definition:Lindelöf Space|Lindelöf]] [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Then $T$ is a [[Definition:T4 Space|$T_4$ space]].
From [[T3 Lindelöf Space is Fully T4|$T_3$ Lindelöf Space is Fully $T_4$]]: :$T$ is a [[Definition:Fully T4 Space|fully $T_4$ space]]. From [[Fully T4 Space is T4|Fully $T_4$ Space is $T_4$]]: :$T$ is a [[Definition:T4 Space|$T_4$ space]]. {{qed}}
T3 Lindelöf Space is T4/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/T3_Lindelöf_Space_is_T4
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/T3_Lindelöf_Space_is_T4/Proof_2
[ "T3 Spaces", "Lindelöf Spaces", "T4 Spaces", "T3 Lindelöf Space is T4" ]
[ "Definition:T3 Space", "Definition:Lindelöf Space", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:T4 Space" ]
[ "T3 Lindelöf Space is Fully T4", "Definition:Fully T4 Space", "Fully T4 Space is T4", "Definition:T4 Space" ]
proofwiki-20501
T3 Lindelöf Space is Fully T4
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a $T_3$ Lindelöf topological space. Then $T$ is a fully $T_4$ space.
From $T_3$ Lindelöf Space is Paracompact: :$T$ is a paracompact space From $T_3$ Space is Fully $T_4$ iff Paracompact: :$T$ is a fully $T_4$ space {{qed}}
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:T3 Space|$T_3$]] [[Definition:Lindelöf Space|Lindelöf]] [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Then $T$ is a [[Definition:Fully T4 Space|fully $T_4$ space]].
From [[T3 Lindelöf Space is Paracompact|$T_3$ Lindelöf Space is Paracompact]]: :$T$ is a [[Definition:Paracompact Space|paracompact space]] From [[T3 Space is Fully T4 iff Paracompact|$T_3$ Space is Fully $T_4$ iff Paracompact]]: :$T$ is a [[Definition:Fully T4 Space|fully $T_4$ space]] {{qed}}
T3 Lindelöf Space is Fully T4
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/T3_Lindelöf_Space_is_Fully_T4
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/T3_Lindelöf_Space_is_Fully_T4
[ "T3 Spaces", "Lindelöf Spaces", "Fully T4 Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:T3 Space", "Definition:Lindelöf Space", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Fully T4 Space" ]
[ "T3 Lindelöf Space is Paracompact", "Definition:Paracompact Space", "T3 Space is Fully T4 iff Paracompact", "Definition:Fully T4 Space" ]
proofwiki-20502
Mazur's Theorem
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} } $ be a normed vector space over $\GF$ with weak topology $w$. Let $C \subseteq X$ be a convex subset of $X$. Then: :$\map {\cl_w} C = \map \cl C$ where $\cl_w$ denotes the weak closure.
From Topological Closure in Coarser Topology is Larger: :$\map \cl C \subseteq \map {\cl_w} C$ Now let $x \not \in \map \cl C$. From Finite Topological Space is Compact, $\set x$ is compact. Applying: :Hahn-Banach Separation Theorem: Compact Convex Set and Closed Convex Set (Real Case) if $\GF = \R$ :Hahn-Banach Se...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} } $ be a [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector space]] over $\GF$ with [[Definition:Weak Topology on Topological Vector Space|weak topology]] $w$. Let $C \subseteq X$ be a [[Definition:Convex Set (Vector Space)|convex subset]] of $X$. Then...
From [[Topological Closure in Coarser Topology is Larger]]: :$\map \cl C \subseteq \map {\cl_w} C$ Now let $x \not \in \map \cl C$. From [[Finite Topological Space is Compact]], $\set x$ is [[Definition:Compact Topological Space|compact]]. Applying: :[[Hahn-Banach Separation Theorem/Normed Vector Space/Real Ca...
Mazur's Theorem
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Mazur's_Theorem
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Mazur's_Theorem
[ "Mazur's Theorem", "Weak Topologies on Topological Vector Spaces", "Convex Sets (Vector Spaces)", "Weakly Closed Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Weak Topology on Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Convex Set (Vector Space)", "Definition:Weak Closure" ]
[ "Topological Closure in Coarser Topology is Larger", "Finite Topological Space is Compact", "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Hahn-Banach Separation Theorem/Normed Vector Space/Real Case/Compact Convex Set and Closed Convex Set", "Hahn-Banach Separation Theorem/Normed Vector Space/Complex Case/Compac...
proofwiki-20503
Open Ball in Infinite-Dimensional Normed Vector Space is not Weakly Open
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be a normed vector space over $\GF$ with weak topology $w$. Suppose that $\dim X = \infty$. Let $\map {B_r} x$ be the open ball in $X$ with radius $r > 0$ and center $x \in X$. Then $\map {B_r} x$ is not weakly open.
From Translation of Open Set in Normed Vector Space is Open and Dilation of Open Set in Normed Vector Space is Open, it suffices to show that $\map {B_1} 0$ is not weakly open. {{AimForCont}} that $\map {B_1} 0$ is weakly open. From Initial Topology on Vector Space Generated by Linear Functionals is Locally Convex, $\...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be a [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector space]] over $\GF$ with [[Definition:Weak Topology on Topological Vector Space|weak topology]] $w$. Suppose that $\dim X = \infty$. Let $\map {B_r} x$ be the [[Definition:Open Ball|open ball]] i...
From [[Translation of Open Set in Normed Vector Space is Open]] and [[Dilation of Open Set in Normed Vector Space is Open]], it suffices to show that $\map {B_1} 0$ is not [[Definition:Weakly Open Set|weakly open]]. {{AimForCont}} that $\map {B_1} 0$ is [[Definition:Weakly Open Set|weakly open]]. From [[Initial Topo...
Open Ball in Infinite-Dimensional Normed Vector Space is not Weakly Open
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Open_Ball_in_Infinite-Dimensional_Normed_Vector_Space_is_not_Weakly_Open
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Open_Ball_in_Infinite-Dimensional_Normed_Vector_Space_is_not_Weakly_Open
[ "Open Balls", "Weakly Open Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Weak Topology on Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Open Ball", "Definition:Open Ball/Radius", "Definition:Open Ball/Center", "Definition:Weakly Open Set" ]
[ "Translation of Open Set in Normed Vector Space is Open", "Dilation of Open Set in Normed Vector Space is Open", "Definition:Weakly Open Set", "Definition:Weakly Open Set", "Initial Topology on Vector Space Generated by Linear Functionals is Locally Convex", "Definition:Locally Convex Space", "Open Sets...
proofwiki-20504
Equation of Plane Wave is Particular Solution of Wave Equation/Direction Cosine Form
Let $\phi$ be a plane wave propagated with velocity $c$ in a Cartesian $3$-space. Let $\phi$ be expressed as: :$\map \phi {x, y, z, t} = \map f {l x + m y + n z - c t}$ where $l$, $m$ and $n$ are the direction cosines of the normal to $P$. Then $\phi$ satisfies the wave equation.
The wave equation is expressible as: :$\dfrac 1 {c^2} \dfrac {\partial^2 \phi} {\partial t^2} = \dfrac {\partial^2 \phi} {\partial x^2} + \dfrac {\partial^2 \phi} {\partial y^2} + \dfrac {\partial^2 \phi} {\partial z^2}$ Let $u = l x + m y + n z - c t$. The second partial derivatives {{WRT|Differentiation}} $x$ are as ...
Let $\phi$ be a [[Definition:Plane Wave|plane wave]] [[Definition:Direction of Propagation of Wave|propagated]] with [[Definition:Velocity|velocity]] $c$ in a [[Definition:Cartesian 3-Space|Cartesian $3$-space]]. Let $\phi$ be expressed as: :$\map \phi {x, y, z, t} = \map f {l x + m y + n z - c t}$ where $l$, $m$ and ...
The [[Definition:Wave Equation|wave equation]] is expressible as: :$\dfrac 1 {c^2} \dfrac {\partial^2 \phi} {\partial t^2} = \dfrac {\partial^2 \phi} {\partial x^2} + \dfrac {\partial^2 \phi} {\partial y^2} + \dfrac {\partial^2 \phi} {\partial z^2}$ Let $u = l x + m y + n z - c t$. The second [[Definition:Partial D...
Equation of Plane Wave is Particular Solution of Wave Equation/Direction Cosine Form
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equation_of_Plane_Wave_is_Particular_Solution_of_Wave_Equation/Direction_Cosine_Form
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equation_of_Plane_Wave_is_Particular_Solution_of_Wave_Equation/Direction_Cosine_Form
[ "Equation of Plane Wave is Particular Solution of Wave Equation" ]
[ "Definition:Plane Wave", "Definition:Wave/Direction of Propagation", "Definition:Velocity", "Definition:Cartesian 3-Space", "Definition:Direction Cosines", "Definition:Normal Vector", "Definition:Wave Equation" ]
[ "Definition:Wave Equation", "Definition:Partial Derivative", "Chain Rule for Partial Derivatives", "Derivative of Constant Multiple", "Chain Rule for Partial Derivatives", "Definition:Partial Derivative", "Definition:Wave Equation", "Relation between Direction Cosines" ]
proofwiki-20505
Continuous Linear Transformation Space as Banach Algebra
Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_X}$ be a normed vector space. Let $\map {CL} X := \map {CL} {X, X}$ be a continuous linear transformation space. Let $*_X : X \times X \to X$ and $* : \map {CL} X \times \map {CL} X \to \map {CL} X$ be bilinear mappings. Suppose $\struct {\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_X}, *_X}$ is...
{{questionable|Please review the source. This cannot be true for any $*$, I believe this should be a composition. Mapping everything to zero is a counterexample.}} {{ProofWanted}}
Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_X}$ be a [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector space]]. Let $\map {CL} X := \map {CL} {X, X}$ be a [[Definition:Continuous Linear Transformation Space|continuous linear transformation space]]. Let $*_X : X \times X \to X$ and $* : \map {CL} X \times \map {CL} X \to \map {...
{{questionable|Please review the source. This cannot be true for any $*$, I believe this should be a composition. Mapping everything to zero is a counterexample.}} {{ProofWanted}}
Continuous Linear Transformation Space as Banach Algebra
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Linear_Transformation_Space_as_Banach_Algebra
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Linear_Transformation_Space_as_Banach_Algebra
[]
[ "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Continuous Linear Transformation Space", "Definition:Bilinear Mapping", "Definition:Banach Algebra", "Definition:Supremum Operator Norm", "Definition:Banach Algebra" ]
[]
proofwiki-20506
Set of Points for which Seminorm is Zero is Vector Subspace
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a vector space over $\GF$. Let $p$ be a seminorm on $X$. Let: :$U = \set {x \in X : \map p x = 0}$ Then $U$ is a vector subspace of $X$.
From Seminorm Maps Zero Vector to Zero, $\map p {\mathbf 0_X} = 0$. So $\mathbf 0_X \in U$ and in particular $U \ne \O$. So we look to apply One-Step Vector Subspace Test. Let $x, y \in U$ and $\lambda, \mu \in \GF$. Then we have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map p {\lambda x + \mu y} | o = \le | r = \map p {\lambda...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Vector Space|vector space]] over $\GF$. Let $p$ be a [[Definition:Seminorm|seminorm]] on $X$. Let: :$U = \set {x \in X : \map p x = 0}$ Then $U$ is a [[Definition:Vector Subspace|vector subspace]] of $X$.
From [[Seminorm Maps Zero Vector to Zero]], $\map p {\mathbf 0_X} = 0$. So $\mathbf 0_X \in U$ and in particular $U \ne \O$. So we look to apply [[One-Step Vector Subspace Test]]. Let $x, y \in U$ and $\lambda, \mu \in \GF$. Then we have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map p {\lambda x + \mu y} | o = \le | r = \m...
Set of Points for which Seminorm is Zero is Vector Subspace
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_of_Points_for_which_Seminorm_is_Zero_is_Vector_Subspace
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_of_Points_for_which_Seminorm_is_Zero_is_Vector_Subspace
[ "Seminorms", "Vector Subspaces" ]
[ "Definition:Vector Space", "Definition:Seminorm", "Definition:Vector Subspace" ]
[ "Seminorm Maps Zero Vector to Zero", "One-Step Vector Subspace Test", "One-Step Vector Subspace Test", "Definition:Vector Subspace" ]
proofwiki-20507
Open Ball with respect to Seminorm is Convex, Balanced and Absorbing
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a vector space over $\GF$. Let $p$ be a seminorm on $X$. Let $d_p$ be the pseudometric induced by $p$. Let $B$ be the open unit ball in $\struct {X, d_p}$. That is: :$B = \set {x \in X : \map p x < 1}$ Then $B$ is convex, balanced and absorbing.
=== Proof that $B$ is convex === Let $t \in \closedint 0 1$ and $x, y \in B$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map p {t x + \paren {1 - t} y} | o = \le | r = t \map p x + \paren {1 - t} \map p y | c = {{SeminormAxiom|2}}, {{SeminormAxiom|3}} }} {{eqn | o = < | r = t + \paren {1 - t} }} {{eqn | r = 1 }} {{end-e...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Vector Space|vector space]] over $\GF$. Let $p$ be a [[Definition:Seminorm|seminorm]] on $X$. Let $d_p$ be the [[Definition:Pseudometric Induced by Seminorm|pseudometric induced by $p$]]. Let $B$ be the [[Definition:Open Unit Ball|open unit ball]] in $\struct ...
=== Proof that $B$ is convex === Let $t \in \closedint 0 1$ and $x, y \in B$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map p {t x + \paren {1 - t} y} | o = \le | r = t \map p x + \paren {1 - t} \map p y | c = {{SeminormAxiom|2}}, {{SeminormAxiom|3}} }} {{eqn | o = < | r = t + \paren {1 - t} }} {{eqn | r = 1 }} {{en...
Open Ball with respect to Seminorm is Convex, Balanced and Absorbing
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Open_Ball_with_respect_to_Seminorm_is_Convex,_Balanced_and_Absorbing
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Open_Ball_with_respect_to_Seminorm_is_Convex,_Balanced_and_Absorbing
[ "Convex Sets (Vector Spaces)", "Absorbing Sets", "Balanced Sets", "Seminorms" ]
[ "Definition:Vector Space", "Definition:Seminorm", "Definition:Pseudometric Induced by Seminorm", "Definition:Open Unit Ball", "Definition:Convex Set (Vector Space)", "Definition:Balanced Set", "Definition:Absorbing Set" ]
[]
proofwiki-20508
Closed Unit Ball in Normed Vector Space is Weakly Closed
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be a normed vector space over $\GF$. Let $B^-$ be the closed unit ball in $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$. Then $B^-$ is weakly closed.
From Closed Unit Ball is Convex Set, $B^-$ is convex. From Closed Ball is Closed, $B^-$ is $\norm {\, \cdot \,}$-closed. From Mazur's Theorem: Corollary, we can conclude that $B^-$ is weakly closed. {{qed}} Category:Weakly Closed Sets Category:Closed Balls Category:Normed Vector Spaces 0z00xz69xza14gdzpcmaqakznsdyxz4
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be a [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector space]] over $\GF$. Let $B^-$ be the [[Definition:Closed Unit Ball|closed unit ball]] in $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$. Then $B^-$ is [[Definition:Weakly Closed Set|weakly closed]].
From [[Closed Unit Ball is Convex Set]], $B^-$ is [[Definition:Convex Set (Vector Space)|convex]]. From [[Closed Ball is Closed]], $B^-$ is [[Definition:Closed Set|$\norm {\, \cdot \,}$-closed]]. From [[Mazur's Theorem/Corollary|Mazur's Theorem: Corollary]], we can conclude that $B^-$ is [[Definition:Weakly Closed S...
Closed Unit Ball in Normed Vector Space is Weakly Closed
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closed_Unit_Ball_in_Normed_Vector_Space_is_Weakly_Closed
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closed_Unit_Ball_in_Normed_Vector_Space_is_Weakly_Closed
[ "Normed Vector Spaces", "Weakly Closed Sets", "Closed Balls", "Normed Vector Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Closed Unit Ball", "Definition:Weakly Closed Set" ]
[ "Closed Unit Ball is Convex Set", "Definition:Convex Set (Vector Space)", "Closed Ball is Closed", "Definition:Closed Set", "Mazur's Theorem/Corollary", "Definition:Weakly Closed Set", "Category:Weakly Closed Sets", "Category:Closed Balls", "Category:Normed Vector Spaces" ]
proofwiki-20509
Upper Darboux Integral Never Smaller than Lower Darboux Integral
Let $\closedint a b$ be a closed real interval. Let $f: \closedint a b \to \R$ be a bounded real function. The lower Darboux integral of $f$ over $\closedint a b$ is less than or equal to the upper Darboux integral of $f$ over the same bounds. That is: :$\ds \underline {\int_a^b} \map f x \rd x \le \overline {\int_a^b}...
Let the value of the lower Darboux integral be $L$, and the value of the upper Darboux integral be $U$. {{AimForCont}}, suppose $L > U$. Then $\epsilon = \dfrac {L - U} 2$ is positive. By the definitions of lower Darboux integral and upper Darboux integral: :$\ds \sup_P \map L P > \inf_P \map U P$ where $P$ ranges over...
Let $\closedint a b$ be a [[Definition:Closed Real Interval|closed real interval]]. Let $f: \closedint a b \to \R$ be a [[Definition:Bounded Real-Valued Function|bounded]] [[Definition:Real Function|real function]]. The [[Definition:Lower Darboux Integral|lower Darboux integral]] of $f$ over $\closedint a b$ is less ...
Let the value of the [[Definition:Lower Darboux Integral|lower Darboux integral]] be $L$, and the value of the [[Definition:Upper Darboux Integral|upper Darboux integral]] be $U$. {{AimForCont}}, suppose $L > U$. Then $\epsilon = \dfrac {L - U} 2$ is positive. By the definitions of [[Definition:Lower Darboux Integra...
Upper Darboux Integral Never Smaller than Lower Darboux Integral
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Upper_Darboux_Integral_Never_Smaller_than_Lower_Darboux_Integral
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Upper_Darboux_Integral_Never_Smaller_than_Lower_Darboux_Integral
[ "Lower Darboux Integral", "Upper Darboux Integral", "Integral Calculus" ]
[ "Definition:Real Interval/Closed", "Definition:Bounded Mapping/Real-Valued", "Definition:Real Function", "Definition:Lower Darboux Integral", "Definition:Upper Darboux Integral" ]
[ "Definition:Lower Darboux Integral", "Definition:Upper Darboux Integral", "Definition:Lower Darboux Integral", "Definition:Upper Darboux Integral", "Definition:Subdivision of Interval", "Definition:Lower Darboux Sum", "Definition:Upper Darboux Sum", "Characterizing Property of Supremum of Subset of Re...
proofwiki-20510
Minkowski Functional of Convex Absorbing Set is Finite
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a vector space over $\GF$. Let $A \subseteq X$ be a convex absorbing set. Let $\mu_A$ be the Minkowski functional of $A$. Then for each $x \in X$, $\map {\mu_A} x$ is a finite extended real number. That is: :$\forall x \in X: \map {\mu_A} x < \infty$
Let $x \in X$. From Characterization of Convex Absorbing Set in Vector Space: :$\exists t \in \R_{>0}: x \in t A$ where $t A$ denotes the dilation of $A$ by $t$. Then: :$x \in t^{-1} C$ so that: :$t \in \set {t > 0 : t^{-1} x \in A}$ Then, we have: :$\map {\mu_A} x \le t < \infty$ {{qed}} Category:Minkowski Function...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Vector Space|vector space]] over $\GF$. Let $A \subseteq X$ be a [[Definition:Convex Set (Vector Space)|convex]] [[Definition:Absorbing Set|absorbing set]]. Let $\mu_A$ be the [[Definition:Minkowski Functional|Minkowski functional]] of $A$. Then for each $x...
Let $x \in X$. From [[Characterization of Convex Absorbing Set in Vector Space]]: :$\exists t \in \R_{>0}: x \in t A$ where $t A$ denotes the [[Definition:Dilation of Subset of Vector Space|dilation of $A$ by $t$]]. Then: :$x \in t^{-1} C$ so that: :$t \in \set {t > 0 : t^{-1} x \in A}$ Then, we have: :$\map {\mu_...
Minkowski Functional of Convex Absorbing Set is Finite
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Minkowski_Functional_of_Convex_Absorbing_Set_is_Finite
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Minkowski_Functional_of_Convex_Absorbing_Set_is_Finite
[ "Minkowski Functionals" ]
[ "Definition:Vector Space", "Definition:Convex Set (Vector Space)", "Definition:Absorbing Set", "Definition:Minkowski Functional", "Definition:Finite Extended Real Number" ]
[ "Characterization of Convex Absorbing Set in Vector Space", "Definition:Linear Combination of Subsets of Vector Space/Dilation", "Category:Minkowski Functionals" ]
proofwiki-20511
Minkowski Functional of Open Ball with respect to Seminorm is Seminorm
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a vector space over $\GF$. Let $p$ be a seminorm on $X$. Let: :$B = \set {x \in X : \map p x < 1}$ be the open ball centred at ${\mathbf 0}_X$ with radius $1$ in the pseudometric induced by $p$. Let $\mu_B$ the Minkowski functional of $B$. Then $p = \mu_B$.
From Open Ball with respect to Seminorm is Convex, Balanced and Absorbing, $B$ is convex and absorbing. Hence the definition is valid. Let $x \in X$. From {{SeminormAxiom|2}}: :$\forall s > \map p x: \map p {\dfrac x s} = \dfrac 1 s \map p x < 1$ Then we have: :$s \in \set {t > 0 : t^{-1} x \in B}$ so that: :$\map {...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Vector Space|vector space]] over $\GF$. Let $p$ be a [[Definition:Seminorm|seminorm]] on $X$. Let: :$B = \set {x \in X : \map p x < 1}$ be the [[Definition:Open Ball|open ball]] [[Definition:Center of Open Ball|centred]] at ${\mathbf 0}_X$ with [[Definition...
From [[Open Ball with respect to Seminorm is Convex, Balanced and Absorbing]], $B$ is [[Definition:Convex Set (Vector Space)|convex]] and [[Definition:Absorbing Set|absorbing]]. Hence the definition is valid. Let $x \in X$. From {{SeminormAxiom|2}}: :$\forall s > \map p x: \map p {\dfrac x s} = \dfrac 1 s \map p x...
Minkowski Functional of Open Ball with respect to Seminorm is Seminorm
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Minkowski_Functional_of_Open_Ball_with_respect_to_Seminorm_is_Seminorm
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Minkowski_Functional_of_Open_Ball_with_respect_to_Seminorm_is_Seminorm
[ "Minkowski Functional", "Minkowski Functionals", "Seminorms", "Minkowski Functionals" ]
[ "Definition:Vector Space", "Definition:Seminorm", "Definition:Open Ball", "Definition:Open Ball/Center", "Definition:Open Ball/Radius", "Definition:Pseudometric Induced by Seminorm", "Definition:Minkowski Functional" ]
[ "Open Ball with respect to Seminorm is Convex, Balanced and Absorbing", "Definition:Convex Set (Vector Space)", "Definition:Absorbing Set", "Definition:Infimum of Set/Real Numbers" ]
proofwiki-20512
Continuous Linear Operator over Finite Dimensional Vector Space is Invertible
Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot\,}_X}$ be a normed vector space. Let $\map {CL} X := \map {CL} {X, X}$ be a continuous linear transformation space. Let $I \in \map {CL} X$ be the identity element. Let $S, T \in \map {CL} X$. Suppose the dimension of $X$ is finite: :$d = \dim X < \infty$ Suppose $T \circ S = I$ where $...
Let $x \in X$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\paren {T \circ S} } x | r = \map I x }} {{eqn | ll = \leadsto | l = \map T {\map {S} x} | r = x }} {{end-eqn}} Let $\mathbf 0 \in X$ be the zero vector of $X$. Suppose $\map S x = \mathbf 0$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map T {\map S x} ...
Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot\,}_X}$ be a [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector space]]. Let $\map {CL} X := \map {CL} {X, X}$ be a [[Definition:Continuous Linear Transformation Space|continuous linear transformation space]]. Let $I \in \map {CL} X$ be the [[Definition:Identity Element|identity element]]....
Let $x \in X$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\paren {T \circ S} } x | r = \map I x }} {{eqn | ll = \leadsto | l = \map T {\map {S} x} | r = x }} {{end-eqn}} Let $\mathbf 0 \in X$ be the [[Definition:Zero Vector|zero vector]] of $X$. Suppose $\map S x = \mathbf 0$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{...
Continuous Linear Operator over Finite Dimensional Vector Space is Invertible
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Linear_Operator_over_Finite_Dimensional_Vector_Space_is_Invertible
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Linear_Operator_over_Finite_Dimensional_Vector_Space_is_Invertible
[ "Continuous Linear Transformations", "Inverse Mappings" ]
[ "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Continuous Linear Transformation Space", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity", "Definition:Dimension of Vector Space", "Definition:Finite Cardinal", "Definition:Composition of Mappings", "Definition:Invertible Continuous Linear Operato...
[ "Definition:Zero Vector", "Linear Transformation Maps Zero Vector to Zero Vector", "Definition:Kernel of Linear Transformation/Vector Space", "Definition:Basis of Vector Space", "Definition:Scalar/Vector Space", "Definition:Number Field", "Definition:Linear Transformation/Vector Space", "Definition:Li...
proofwiki-20513
Equivalence of Definitions of Riemann and Darboux Integrals
Let $\closedint a b$ be a closed real interval. Let $f: \closedint a b \to \R$ be a real function. Then: :the Riemann integral of $f$ over $\closedint a b$ exists and is equal to $L$ {{iff}}: :the Darboux integral of $f$ over $\closedint a b$ exists and is equal to $L$.
=== Riemann Integral $\implies$ Darboux Integral === Let $L$ be the Riemann integral of $f$ over $\closedint a b$. Then $\forall \epsilon > 0: \exists \delta > 0$ such that for every finite subdivision with norm $< \delta$ and every sequence of corresponding sample points, the Riemann sum of the subdivision is in $\ope...
Let $\closedint a b$ be a [[Definition:Closed Real Interval|closed real interval]]. Let $f: \closedint a b \to \R$ be a [[Definition:Real Function|real function]]. Then: :the [[Definition:Riemann Integral|Riemann integral]] of $f$ over $\closedint a b$ exists and is equal to $L$ {{iff}}: :the [[Definition:Darboux Int...
=== Riemann Integral $\implies$ Darboux Integral === Let $L$ be the [[Definition:Riemann Integral|Riemann integral]] of $f$ over $\closedint a b$. Then $\forall \epsilon > 0: \exists \delta > 0$ such that for every [[Definition:Finite Subdivision|finite subdivision]] with [[Definition:Norm of Subdivision|norm]] $< \d...
Equivalence of Definitions of Riemann and Darboux Integrals
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Riemann_and_Darboux_Integrals
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Riemann_and_Darboux_Integrals
[ "Integral Calculus" ]
[ "Definition:Real Interval/Closed", "Definition:Real Function", "Definition:Definite Integral/Riemann", "Definition:Definite Integral/Darboux" ]
[ "Definition:Definite Integral/Riemann", "Definition:Subdivision of Interval/Finite", "Definition:Norm of Subdivision", "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Riemann Sum", "Definition:Lower Darboux Integral", "Definition:Subdivision of Interval/Finite", "Definition:Norm of Subdivision", "Definition:Lowe...
proofwiki-20514
Wave Equation is Linear
Let $\phi_1$ and $\phi_2$ be particular solutions to the wave equation. Then: :$a_1 \phi_1 + a_2 \phi_2$ is also a particular solution to the wave equation.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\dfrac {\partial^2} {\partial t^2} } {a_1 \phi_1 + a_2 \phi_2} | r = a_1 \map {\dfrac {\partial^2} {\partial t^2} } {\phi_1} + a_2 \map {\dfrac {\partial^2} {\partial t^2} } {\phi_2} | c = Linear Combination of Derivatives }} {{eqn | l = \map {\dfrac {\partial^2} {\partial x^...
Let $\phi_1$ and $\phi_2$ be [[Definition:Particular Solution to Differential Equation|particular solutions]] to the [[Definition:Wave Equation|wave equation]]. Then: :$a_1 \phi_1 + a_2 \phi_2$ is also a [[Definition:Particular Solution to Differential Equation|particular solution]] to the [[Definition:Wave Equation|w...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\dfrac {\partial^2} {\partial t^2} } {a_1 \phi_1 + a_2 \phi_2} | r = a_1 \map {\dfrac {\partial^2} {\partial t^2} } {\phi_1} + a_2 \map {\dfrac {\partial^2} {\partial t^2} } {\phi_2} | c = [[Linear Combination of Derivatives]] }} {{eqn | l = \map {\dfrac {\partial^2} {\partia...
Wave Equation is Linear
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Wave_Equation_is_Linear
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Wave_Equation_is_Linear
[ "Wave Equation" ]
[ "Definition:Differential Equation/Solution/Particular Solution", "Definition:Wave Equation", "Definition:Differential Equation/Solution/Particular Solution", "Definition:Wave Equation" ]
[ "Linear Combination of Derivatives", "Linear Combination of Derivatives", "Linear Combination of Derivatives", "Linear Combination of Derivatives", "Definition:Wave Equation", "Definition:Wave Equation" ]
proofwiki-20515
Well-Defined Jordan Content Equals Content
Let $M$ be a bounded subspace of Euclidean space. Let the Jordan content of $M$ be $\map m M$. Then the content $\map V M = \map m M$.
Let $C$ be a finite covering of $M$. By {{EuclidCommonNotionLink|5}}, $\map V C \ge \map V M$. Therefore, $\map V M$ is a lower bound of all $\map V C$. So by the definition of greatest lower bound: :$\map V M \le \map {m^*} M$ Let $D$ be a finite covering of $S \setminus M$. By the same reasoning: :$\map V {S \setminu...
Let $M$ be a [[Definition:Bounded (Metric Space)|bounded]] [[Definition:Subspace|subspace]] of [[Definition:Euclidean Space|Euclidean space]]. Let the [[Definition:Jordan Content|Jordan content]] of $M$ be $\map m M$. Then the [[Definition:Content (Measure Theory)|content]] $\map V M = \map m M$.
Let $C$ be a [[Definition:Finite Cover|finite covering]] of $M$. By {{EuclidCommonNotionLink|5}}, $\map V C \ge \map V M$. Therefore, $\map V M$ is a [[Definition:Lower Bound|lower bound]] of all $\map V C$. So by the definition of [[Definition:Greatest Lower Bound|greatest lower bound]]: :$\map V M \le \map {m^*} M...
Well-Defined Jordan Content Equals Content
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Well-Defined_Jordan_Content_Equals_Content
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Well-Defined_Jordan_Content_Equals_Content
[]
[ "Definition:Bounded Metric Space", "Definition:Subspace", "Definition:Euclidean Space", "Definition:Jordan Content", "Definition:Content (Measure Theory)" ]
[ "Definition:Cover of Set/Finite", "Definition:Lower Bound", "Definition:Infimum of Set/Real Numbers", "Definition:Cover of Set/Finite" ]
proofwiki-20516
Outer Jordan Content Never Smaller than Inner Jordan Content
Let $M$ be a bounded subspace of Euclidean space. Then: :$\map {m^*} M \ge \map {m_*} M$ where: :$m^*$ denotes the outer Jordan content :$m_*$ denotes the inner Jordan content
Let $\RR$ be a closed rectangle that contains $M$. By definition of inner Jordan content: :$\map {m_*} M = \map V \RR - \map {m^*} {\RR \setminus M}$ But since: :$\RR = M \cup \paren {\RR \setminus M}$ we have by Outer Jordan Content is Subadditive that: :$\map {m^*} \RR \le \map {m^*} M + \map {m^*} {\RR \setminus M}$...
Let $M$ be a [[Definition:Bounded (Metric Space)|bounded]] [[Definition:Subspace|subspace]] of [[Definition:Euclidean Space|Euclidean space]]. Then: :$\map {m^*} M \ge \map {m_*} M$ where: :$m^*$ denotes the [[Definition:Outer Jordan Content|outer Jordan content]] :$m_*$ denotes the [[Definition:Inner Jordan Content|i...
Let $\RR$ be a [[Definition:Closed Rectangle|closed rectangle]] that [[Definition:Set Containment|contains]] $M$. By definition of [[Definition:Inner Jordan Content|inner Jordan content]]: :$\map {m_*} M = \map V \RR - \map {m^*} {\RR \setminus M}$ But since: :$\RR = M \cup \paren {\RR \setminus M}$ we have by [[Oute...
Outer Jordan Content Never Smaller than Inner Jordan Content
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Outer_Jordan_Content_Never_Smaller_than_Inner_Jordan_Content
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Outer_Jordan_Content_Never_Smaller_than_Inner_Jordan_Content
[ "Outer Jordan Content" ]
[ "Definition:Bounded Metric Space", "Definition:Subspace", "Definition:Euclidean Space", "Definition:Outer Jordan Content", "Definition:Inner Jordan Content" ]
[ "Definition:Closed Rectangle", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Inner Jordan Content", "Outer Jordan Content is Subadditive", "Outer Jordan Content of Closed Rectangle", "Category:Outer Jordan Content" ]
proofwiki-20517
Sum of Equal and Opposite Harmonic Waves form Stationary Wave
Let $\phi_1$ be a harmonic wave which is propagated along the $x$-axis in the positive direction with constant velocity $c$. Let $\phi_2$ be a harmonic wave travelling with constant velocity $-c$, that is, at the same speed as $\phi_1$ but in the opposite direction. Then their sum $\phi_1 + \phi_2$ describes a stationa...
From Equation of Harmonic Wave: Wave Number and Frequency: :$(1): \quad \map {\phi_1} {x, t} = a \map \cos {2 \pi \paren {k x - \nu t} }$ where: :$k$ denotes the wave number of $\phi_1$ :$\nu$ denotes the frequency of $\phi_1$. From Equation of Wave with Constant Velocity: Corollary, the equation of $\phi_2$ is: :$(2):...
Let $\phi_1$ be a [[Definition:Harmonic Wave|harmonic wave]] which is [[Definition:Direction of Propagation of Wave|propagated]] along the [[Definition:X-Axis|$x$-axis]] in the [[Definition:Positive Direction|positive direction]] with [[Definition:Constant|constant]] [[Definition:Velocity|velocity]] $c$. Let $\phi_2$...
From [[Equation of Harmonic Wave/Wave Number and Frequency|Equation of Harmonic Wave: Wave Number and Frequency]]: :$(1): \quad \map {\phi_1} {x, t} = a \map \cos {2 \pi \paren {k x - \nu t} }$ where: :$k$ denotes the [[Definition:Wave Number of Periodic Wave|wave number]] of $\phi_1$ :$\nu$ denotes the [[Definition:Fr...
Sum of Equal and Opposite Harmonic Waves form Stationary Wave
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Equal_and_Opposite_Harmonic_Waves_form_Stationary_Wave
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Equal_and_Opposite_Harmonic_Waves_form_Stationary_Wave
[ "Harmonic Waves", "Stationary Waves" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Wave", "Definition:Wave/Direction of Propagation", "Definition:Axis/X-Axis", "Definition:Axis/Positive Direction", "Definition:Constant", "Definition:Velocity", "Definition:Harmonic Wave", "Definition:Constant", "Definition:Velocity", "Definition:Speed", "Definition:Addition...
[ "Equation of Harmonic Wave/Wave Number and Frequency", "Definition:Periodic Wave/Wave Number", "Definition:Periodic Wave/Frequency", "Equation of Wave with Constant Velocity/Corollary", "Prosthaphaeresis Formulas/Cosine plus Cosine", "Cosine Function is Even", "Definition:Stationary Wave" ]
proofwiki-20518
Regular Second-Countable Space is Homeomorphic to Subspace of Hilbert Cube/Lemma 2
:the family of continuous mappings $\family{f_{U,V}}_{\tuple{U,V} \in \AA}$ separates points from closed sets
Let $F$ be a closed subset of $T$. Let $x \in S \setminus F$. By definition of closed subset: :$S \setminus F$ is open in $S$ Let $V = S \setminus F$. By definition of regular space: :$\exists U \in \tau: x \subseteq U, U^- \subseteq V$ Hence $\tuple{U, V} \in \AA$. Consider the Urysohn function $f_{U, V}$ for $U^-$ an...
:the [[Definition:Indexed Family|family]] of [[Definition:Continuous Mapping|continuous mappings]] $\family{f_{U,V}}_{\tuple{U,V} \in \AA}$ [[Definition:Mappings Separating Points from Closed Sets|separates points from closed sets]]
Let $F$ be a [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed subset]] of $T$. Let $x \in S \setminus F$. By definition of [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed subset]]: :$S \setminus F$ is [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open]] in $S$ Let $V = S \setminus F$. By definition of [[Definition:Regular Space|regular spa...
Regular Second-Countable Space is Homeomorphic to Subspace of Hilbert Cube/Lemma 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Regular_Second-Countable_Space_is_Homeomorphic_to_Subspace_of_Hilbert_Cube/Lemma_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Regular_Second-Countable_Space_is_Homeomorphic_to_Subspace_of_Hilbert_Cube/Lemma_2
[ "Regular Second-Countable Space is Homeomorphic to Subspace of Hilbert Cube" ]
[ "Definition:Indexing Set/Family", "Definition:Continuous Mapping", "Definition:Mappings Separating Points from Closed Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Regular Space", "Definition:Urysohn Function", "Definition:Urysohn Function", "Definition:Indexing Set/Family", "Definition:Continuous Mapping", "Definition:Mappings Separating Points from...
proofwiki-20519
Minkowski Functional of Convex Absorbing Set is Sublinear
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a vector space over $\GF$. Let $p$ be a seminorm on $X$. Let $A$ be a convex absorbing set. Let $\mu_A$ be the Minkowski functional of $A$. Then for each $x, y \in X$ we have: :$\map {\mu_A} {x + y} \le \map {\mu_A} x + \map {\mu_A} y$
Let $\epsilon > 0$. By the definition of infimum, we can pick $t > 0$ such that: {{explain|domain of $t$ -- this is not completely obvious, as the underlying set of $X$ includes the case where it's $\C$.}} :$\map {\mu_A} x \le t \le \map {\mu_A} x + \epsilon$ and $t^{-1} x \in A$. We can also pick $s > 0$ such that: ...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Vector Space|vector space]] over $\GF$. Let $p$ be a [[Definition:Seminorm|seminorm]] on $X$. Let $A$ be a [[Definition:Convex Set (Vector Space)|convex]] [[Definition:Absorbing Set|absorbing set]]. Let $\mu_A$ be the [[Definition:Minkowski Functional|Minkows...
Let $\epsilon > 0$. By the definition of [[Definition:Infimum of Subset of Real Numbers|infimum]], we can pick $t > 0$ such that: {{explain|domain of $t$ -- this is not completely obvious, as the underlying set of $X$ includes the case where it's $\C$.}} :$\map {\mu_A} x \le t \le \map {\mu_A} x + \epsilon$ and $t...
Minkowski Functional of Convex Absorbing Set is Sublinear
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Minkowski_Functional_of_Convex_Absorbing_Set_is_Sublinear
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Minkowski_Functional_of_Convex_Absorbing_Set_is_Sublinear
[ "Minkowski Functionals" ]
[ "Definition:Vector Space", "Definition:Seminorm", "Definition:Convex Set (Vector Space)", "Definition:Absorbing Set", "Definition:Minkowski Functional" ]
[ "Definition:Infimum of Set/Real Numbers", "Definition:Convex Set (Vector Space)" ]
proofwiki-20520
Adjoint of Symmetric Densely-Defined Linear Operator Extends Operator
Let $\struct {\HH, \innerprod \cdot \cdot}$ be a Hilbert space. Let $\struct {\map D T, T}$ be a symmetric densely-defined linear operator. Let $\struct {\map D {T^\ast}, T^\ast}$ be the adjoint of $T$. Then $\map D T \subseteq \map D {T^\ast}$ and: :$T x = T^\ast x$ for each $x \in \map D T$.
For each $y \in \HH$, define the linear functional $f_x : \map D T \to \Bbb F$ by: :$\map {f_y} x = \innerprod {T x} y$ for each $x \in \map D T$. We show that for $y \in \map D T$, $f_y$ is bounded. Let $y \in \map D T$, then: :$\innerprod {T x} y = \innerprod x {T y}$ for each $x \in \map D T$. Then we have: {{begi...
Let $\struct {\HH, \innerprod \cdot \cdot}$ be a [[Definition:Hilbert Space|Hilbert space]]. Let $\struct {\map D T, T}$ be a [[Definition:Symmetric Densely-Defined Linear Operator|symmetric]] [[Definition:Densely-Defined Linear Operator|densely-defined linear operator]]. Let $\struct {\map D {T^\ast}, T^\ast}$ be th...
For each $y \in \HH$, define the [[Definition:Linear Functional|linear functional]] $f_x : \map D T \to \Bbb F$ by: :$\map {f_y} x = \innerprod {T x} y$ for each $x \in \map D T$. We show that for $y \in \map D T$, $f_y$ is [[Definition:Bounded Linear Functional|bounded]]. Let $y \in \map D T$, then: :$\innerprod ...
Adjoint of Symmetric Densely-Defined Linear Operator Extends Operator
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Adjoint_of_Symmetric_Densely-Defined_Linear_Operator_Extends_Operator
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Adjoint_of_Symmetric_Densely-Defined_Linear_Operator_Extends_Operator
[ "Symmetric Densely-Defined Linear Operators", "Adjoints (Densely-Defined Linear Operators)" ]
[ "Definition:Hilbert Space", "Definition:Symmetric Densely-Defined Linear Operator", "Definition:Densely-Defined Linear Operator", "Definition:Adjoint of Densely-Defined Linear Operator" ]
[ "Definition:Linear Functional", "Definition:Bounded Linear Functional", "Cauchy-Bunyakovsky-Schwarz Inequality/Inner Product Spaces", "Definition:Bounded Linear Functional", "Definition:Symmetric Densely-Defined Linear Operator", "Definition:Adjoint of Densely-Defined Linear Operator", "Inner Product is...
proofwiki-20521
Spectrum of Bounded Linear Operator is Compact
Let $X$ be a Banach space over $\C$. Let $T : X \to X$ be a bounded linear operator. Let $\map \sigma T$ be the spectrum of $T$. Then $\map \sigma T$ is compact, and: :$\map \sigma T \subseteq \set {\lambda \in \C : \cmod \lambda \le \norm T_{\map \BB X} }$
From Spectrum of Bounded Linear Operator is Closed, $\map \sigma T$ is closed in $\C$. It therefore suffices to show that $\map \sigma T$ is bounded. Hence it will suffice to show that: :$\map \sigma T \subseteq \set {\lambda \in \C : \cmod \lambda \le \norm T_{\map \BB X} }$ Let $\lambda \in \C$ be such that $\cmod \...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Banach Space|Banach space]] over $\C$. Let $T : X \to X$ be a [[Definition:Bounded Linear Operator|bounded linear operator]]. Let $\map \sigma T$ be the [[Definition:Spectrum of Bounded Linear Operator|spectrum]] of $T$. Then $\map \sigma T$ is [[Definition:Compact Subset of Complex Pla...
From [[Spectrum of Bounded Linear Operator is Closed]], $\map \sigma T$ is [[Definition:Closed Set/Complex Analysis|closed]] in $\C$. It therefore suffices to show that $\map \sigma T$ is [[Definition:Bounded Subset of Complex Plane|bounded]]. Hence it will suffice to show that: :$\map \sigma T \subseteq \set {\lam...
Spectrum of Bounded Linear Operator is Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Spectrum_of_Bounded_Linear_Operator_is_Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Spectrum_of_Bounded_Linear_Operator_is_Compact
[ "Spectra (Bounded Linear Operators)", "Compact Spaces (Complex Analysis)" ]
[ "Definition:Banach Space", "Definition:Bounded Linear Operator", "Definition:Spectrum (Spectral Theory)/Bounded Linear Operator", "Definition:Compact Space/Metric Space/Complex" ]
[ "Spectrum of Bounded Linear Operator is Closed", "Definition:Closed Set/Complex Analysis", "Definition:Bounded Metric Space/Complex", "Invertibility of Identity Minus Operator", "Definition:Invertible Bounded Linear Operator", "Definition:Vector Space", "Definition:Invertible Bounded Linear Operator", ...
proofwiki-20522
Resolvent Set of Bounded Linear Operator is Open
Let $X$ be a Banach space over $\C$. Let $T : X \to X$ be a bounded linear operator. Let $\map \rho T$ be the resolvent set of $T$. Then $\map \rho T$ is open.
Let $\lambda \in \map \rho T$. Then $T - \lambda I$ is invertible as a bounded linear operator. Let $\delta > 0$ be such that: :$\cmod \delta < \norm {\paren {T - \lambda I}^{-1} }_{\map \BB X}^{-1}$ Then, we have: :$\norm {\delta I}_{\map \BB X} \norm {\paren {T - \lambda I}^{-1} } < 1$ From Invertibility of Iden...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Banach Space|Banach space]] over $\C$. Let $T : X \to X$ be a [[Definition:Bounded Linear Operator|bounded linear operator]]. Let $\map \rho T$ be the [[Definition:Resolvent Set of Bounded Linear Operator|resolvent set]] of $T$. Then $\map \rho T$ is [[Definition:Open Set (Complex Analys...
Let $\lambda \in \map \rho T$. Then $T - \lambda I$ is [[Definition:Invertible Bounded Linear Operator|invertible as a bounded linear operator]]. Let $\delta > 0$ be such that: :$\cmod \delta < \norm {\paren {T - \lambda I}^{-1} }_{\map \BB X}^{-1}$ Then, we have: :$\norm {\delta I}_{\map \BB X} \norm {\paren ...
Resolvent Set of Bounded Linear Operator is Open
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Resolvent_Set_of_Bounded_Linear_Operator_is_Open
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Resolvent_Set_of_Bounded_Linear_Operator_is_Open
[ "Resolvent Sets (Bounded Linear Operators)" ]
[ "Definition:Banach Space", "Definition:Bounded Linear Operator", "Definition:Resolvent Set/Bounded Linear Operator", "Definition:Open Set/Complex Analysis" ]
[ "Definition:Invertible Bounded Linear Operator", "Invertibility of Identity Minus Operator/Corollary", "Definition:Invertible Bounded Linear Operator", "Definition:Invertible Bounded Linear Operator", "Definition:Open Neighborhood", "Definition:Open Set/Complex Analysis" ]
proofwiki-20523
Spectrum of Adjoint of Bounded Linear Operator
Let $X$ be a Banach space over $\C$. Let $T : X \to X$ be a bounded linear operator. Let $T^\ast : X \to X$ be the adjoint of $T$. Let $\map \sigma T$ and $\map \sigma {T^\ast}$ be the spectrum of $T$ and $T^\ast$ respectively. Then: :$\map \sigma {T^\ast} = \set {\overline \lambda : \lambda \in \map \sigma T}$ wh...
We show that for $\lambda \in \C$, we have $\lambda \not \in \map \sigma T$ {{iff}} $\overline \lambda \not \in \map \sigma {T^\ast}$. Let $\lambda \in \C$ have $\lambda \not \in \map \sigma T$. Then $T - \lambda I$ is invertible as a bounded linear operator. Note that $I^\ast = I$ from Adjoint of Identity Transformati...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Banach Space|Banach space]] over $\C$. Let $T : X \to X$ be a [[Definition:Bounded Linear Operator|bounded linear operator]]. Let $T^\ast : X \to X$ be the [[Definition:Adjoint Linear Transformation|adjoint]] of $T$. Let $\map \sigma T$ and $\map \sigma {T^\ast}$ be the [[Definition:Spect...
We show that for $\lambda \in \C$, we have $\lambda \not \in \map \sigma T$ {{iff}} $\overline \lambda \not \in \map \sigma {T^\ast}$. Let $\lambda \in \C$ have $\lambda \not \in \map \sigma T$. Then $T - \lambda I$ is [[Definition:Invertible Bounded Linear Operator|invertible as a bounded linear operator]]. Note th...
Spectrum of Adjoint of Bounded Linear Operator
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Spectrum_of_Adjoint_of_Bounded_Linear_Operator
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Spectrum_of_Adjoint_of_Bounded_Linear_Operator
[ "Spectra (Bounded Linear Operators)", "Adjoints" ]
[ "Definition:Banach Space", "Definition:Bounded Linear Operator", "Definition:Adjoint Linear Transformation", "Definition:Spectrum (Spectral Theory)/Bounded Linear Operator", "Definition:Complex Conjugate" ]
[ "Definition:Invertible Bounded Linear Operator", "Adjoint of Identity Transformation", "Adjoint is Conjugate Linear", "Adjoining Commutes with Inverting", "Definition:Invertible Bounded Linear Operator", "Adjoint is Involutive", "Complex Conjugation is Involution" ]
proofwiki-20524
Weak-* Topology is Hausdorff
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a topological vector space over $\GF$. Let $X^\ast$ be the topological dual space of $X$. Let $w^\ast$ be the weak-$\ast$ topology on $X^\ast$. Then $\struct {X^\ast, w^\ast}$ is Hausdorff space.
From Initial Topology on Vector Space Generated by Linear Functionals is Locally Convex, $w^\ast$ can be induced by: :$\PP = \set {p_{x^\wedge} : x \in X}$ where we define $p_{x^\wedge} : X^\ast \to \R_{\ge 0}$ by: :$\map {p_{x^\wedge} } f = \cmod {\map {x^\wedge} f} = \cmod {\map f x}$ From Locally Convex Space is H...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Topological Vector Space|topological vector space]] over $\GF$. Let $X^\ast$ be the [[Definition:Topological Dual Space|topological dual space]] of $X$. Let $w^\ast$ be the [[Definition:Weak-* Topology|weak-$\ast$ topology]] on $X^\ast$. Then $\struct {X^\...
From [[Initial Topology on Vector Space Generated by Linear Functionals is Locally Convex]], $w^\ast$ can be [[Definition:Locally Convex Space/Standard Topology|induced by]]: :$\PP = \set {p_{x^\wedge} : x \in X}$ where we define $p_{x^\wedge} : X^\ast \to \R_{\ge 0}$ by: :$\map {p_{x^\wedge} } f = \cmod {\map {x^...
Weak-* Topology is Hausdorff
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Weak-*_Topology_is_Hausdorff
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Weak-*_Topology_is_Hausdorff
[ "Weak-* Topologies", "Hausdorff Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Topological Dual Space", "Definition:Weak-* Topology", "Definition:T2 Space" ]
[ "Initial Topology on Vector Space Generated by Linear Functionals is Locally Convex", "Definition:Locally Convex Space/Standard Topology", "Locally Convex Space is Hausdorff iff induces Hausdorff Topology", "Definition:Locally Convex Space/Hausdorff", "Definition:Separating Family of Seminorms on Vector Spa...
proofwiki-20525
Vector Addition is Continuous in Weak Topology
Let $K$ be a topological field. Let $X$ be a topological vector space over $K$ with weak topology $w$. Define $s : \struct {X, w} \times \struct {X, w} \to \struct {X, w}$ by: :$\map s {x, y} = x + y$ for each $x, y \in X$. Then $s$ is continuous. That is, vector addition remains continuous when restricting to the ...
Let $X^\ast$ be the topological dual space of $X$. From Continuity in Initial Topology, it suffices to show that for each $f \in X^\ast$ we have: :$f \circ s : \struct {X, w} \times \struct {X, w} \to K$ is continuous. Define the projections $\pr_1 : \struct {X, w} \times {X, w} \to \struct {X, w}$ and $\pr_2 : \struc...
Let $K$ be a [[Definition:Topological Field|topological field]]. Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Topological Vector Space|topological vector space]] over $K$ with [[Definition:Weak Topology on Topological Vector Space|weak topology]] $w$. Define $s : \struct {X, w} \times \struct {X, w} \to \struct {X, w}$ by: :$\map s ...
Let $X^\ast$ be the [[Definition:Topological Dual Space|topological dual space]] of $X$. From [[Continuity in Initial Topology]], it suffices to show that for each $f \in X^\ast$ we have: :$f \circ s : \struct {X, w} \times \struct {X, w} \to K$ is [[Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)|continuous]]. Define the...
Vector Addition is Continuous in Weak Topology
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Vector_Addition_is_Continuous_in_Weak_Topology
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Vector_Addition_is_Continuous_in_Weak_Topology
[ "Weak Topologies on Topological Vector Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Field", "Definition:Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Weak Topology on Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Vector Addition", "Definition:Weak Topology on Topological Vector Space" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Dual Space", "Continuity in Initial Topology", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Product Topology", "Definition:Projection (Mapping Theory)/Family of Sets", "Definition:Product Topology/Factor Space", "Definition:Product Topology", "Definition:Continuous M...
proofwiki-20526
Scalar Multiplication is Continuous in Weak Topology
Let $K$ be a topological field. Let $X$ be a topological vector space over $K$ with weak topology $w$. Define $m : K \times \struct {X, w} \to \struct {X, w}$ by: :$\map m {\lambda, x} = \lambda x$ for each $\lambda \in K$, $x \in X$. Then $m$ is continuous. That is, scalar multiplication remains continuous when re...
Let $X^\ast$ be the topological dual space of $X$. From Continuity in Initial Topology, it suffices to show that for each $f \in X^\ast$ we have: :$f \circ m : K \times \struct {X, w} \to K$ is continuous. Define the projections $\pr_1 : K \times {X, w} \to \struct {X, w}$ and $\pr_2 : K \times {X, w} \to \struct {X, ...
Let $K$ be a [[Definition:Topological Field|topological field]]. Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Topological Vector Space|topological vector space]] over $K$ with [[Definition:Weak Topology on Topological Vector Space|weak topology]] $w$. Define $m : K \times \struct {X, w} \to \struct {X, w}$ by: :$\map m {\lambda, x} ...
Let $X^\ast$ be the [[Definition:Topological Dual Space|topological dual space]] of $X$. From [[Continuity in Initial Topology]], it suffices to show that for each $f \in X^\ast$ we have: :$f \circ m : K \times \struct {X, w} \to K$ is [[Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)|continuous]]. Define the [[Definition...
Scalar Multiplication is Continuous in Weak Topology
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Scalar_Multiplication_is_Continuous_in_Weak_Topology
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Scalar_Multiplication_is_Continuous_in_Weak_Topology
[ "Weak Topologies on Topological Vector Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Field", "Definition:Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Weak Topology on Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Scalar Multiplication", "Definition:Weak Topology on Topological Vector Space" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Dual Space", "Continuity in Initial Topology", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Product Topology", "Definition:Projection (Mapping Theory)/Family of Sets", "Definition:Projection (Mapping Theory)/First Projection", "Definition:Projection (Mapping Theory)/Se...
proofwiki-20527
Topological Vector Space over Topological Field remains Topological Vector Space with Weak Topology
Let $K$ be a topological field. Let $X$ be a topological vector space over $K$ admitting a weak topology $w$. Then $\struct {X, w}$ is a topological vector space.
Follows from combining: :Vector Addition is Continuous in Weak Topology :Scalar Multiplication is Continuous in Weak Topology {{qed}} Category:Topological Vector Space over Topological Field remains Topological Vector Space with Weak Topology Category:Weak Topologies on Topological Vector Spaces 624hwlo3fjhh236wdxrued...
Let $K$ be a [[Definition:Topological Field|topological field]]. Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Topological Vector Space|topological vector space]] over $K$ admitting a [[Definition:Weak Topology on Topological Vector Space|weak topology]] $w$. Then $\struct {X, w}$ is a [[Definition:Topological Vector Space|topological...
Follows from combining: :[[Vector Addition is Continuous in Weak Topology]] :[[Scalar Multiplication is Continuous in Weak Topology]] {{qed}} [[Category:Topological Vector Space over Topological Field remains Topological Vector Space with Weak Topology]] [[Category:Weak Topologies on Topological Vector Spaces]] 624h...
Topological Vector Space over Topological Field remains Topological Vector Space with Weak Topology
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Topological_Vector_Space_over_Topological_Field_remains_Topological_Vector_Space_with_Weak_Topology
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Topological_Vector_Space_over_Topological_Field_remains_Topological_Vector_Space_with_Weak_Topology
[ "Topological Vector Space over Topological Field remains Topological Vector Space with Weak Topology", "Weak Topologies on Topological Vector Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Field", "Definition:Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Weak Topology on Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Topological Vector Space" ]
[ "Vector Addition is Continuous in Weak Topology", "Scalar Multiplication is Continuous in Weak Topology", "Category:Topological Vector Space over Topological Field remains Topological Vector Space with Weak Topology", "Category:Weak Topologies on Topological Vector Spaces" ]
proofwiki-20528
Spectrum of Compact Linear Operator on Infinite-Dimensional Banach Space contains Zero
Let $X$ be an infinite-dimensional Banach space over $\C$. Let $T : X \to X$ be a compact linear operator. Let $\map \sigma T$ be the spectrum of $T$. Then $0 \in \map \sigma T$. That is, $T$ is not invertible as a bounded linear operator.
Suppose $0 \not \in \map \sigma T$. Then $T$ is invertible as a bounded linear operator with bounded inverse $T^{-1}$ so that: :$T T^{-1} = I$ From Left Composition of Compact Linear Transformation with Bounded Linear Transformation is Compact, this implies that $I$ is compact. From Identity Operator is Compact iff F...
Let $X$ be an [[Definition:Finite Dimensional Vector Space|infinite-dimensional]] [[Definition:Banach Space|Banach space]] over $\C$. Let $T : X \to X$ be a [[Definition:Compact Linear Operator|compact linear operator]]. Let $\map \sigma T$ be the [[Definition:Spectrum of Bounded Linear Operator|spectrum]] of $T$. ...
Suppose $0 \not \in \map \sigma T$. Then $T$ is [[Definition:Invertible Bounded Linear Operator|invertible as a bounded linear operator]] with [[Definition:Bounded Linear Operator|bounded]] [[Definition:Inverse Linear Operator|inverse]] $T^{-1}$ so that: :$T T^{-1} = I$ From [[Left Composition of Compact Linear Tr...
Spectrum of Compact Linear Operator on Infinite-Dimensional Banach Space contains Zero
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Spectrum_of_Compact_Linear_Operator_on_Infinite-Dimensional_Banach_Space_contains_Zero
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Spectrum_of_Compact_Linear_Operator_on_Infinite-Dimensional_Banach_Space_contains_Zero
[ "Compact Linear Transformations", "Spectra (Bounded Linear Operators)" ]
[ "Definition:Dimension of Vector Space/Finite", "Definition:Banach Space", "Definition:Compact Linear Operator", "Definition:Spectrum (Spectral Theory)/Bounded Linear Operator", "Definition:Invertible Bounded Linear Operator" ]
[ "Definition:Invertible Bounded Linear Operator", "Definition:Bounded Linear Operator", "Definition:Inverse Linear Operator", "Compact Linear Transformations Composed with Bounded Linear Operator", "Definition:Compact Linear Operator", "Identity Operator is Compact iff Finite-Dimensional Normed Vector Spac...
proofwiki-20529
Identity Operator is Compact iff Finite-Dimensional Normed Vector Space
Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be a normed vector space. Let $I : X \to X$ be the identity operator. Then $I$ is compact {{iff}} $X$ is finite-dimensional.
Let $\operatorname {ball} X$ be the closed unit ball in $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$. From the definition of a compact operator, we have that $I$ is compact {{iff}}: :$\overline {\operatorname {ball} X}$ is compact in $\struct {X, \norm \cdot_X}$. From Closed Ball is Closed and Set is Closed iff Equals Topologic...
Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be a [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector space]]. Let $I : X \to X$ be the [[Definition:Identity Operator|identity operator]]. Then $I$ is [[Definition:Compact Linear Operator|compact]] {{iff}} $X$ is [[Definition:Finite Dimensional Vector Space|finite-dimensional...
Let $\operatorname {ball} X$ be the [[Definition:Closed Unit Ball|closed unit ball]] in $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$. From the definition of a [[Definition:Compact Linear Operator|compact operator]], we have that $I$ is [[Definition:Compact Linear Operator|compact]] {{iff}}: :$\overline {\operatorname {ball} X...
Identity Operator is Compact iff Finite-Dimensional Normed Vector Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Identity_Operator_is_Compact_iff_Finite-Dimensional_Normed_Vector_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Identity_Operator_is_Compact_iff_Finite-Dimensional_Normed_Vector_Space
[ "Finite-Dimensional Vector Spaces", "Finite Dimensional Vector Spaces", "Finite Dimensional Vector Spaces", "Compact Linear Transformations" ]
[ "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Identity Mapping", "Definition:Compact Linear Operator", "Definition:Dimension of Vector Space/Finite" ]
[ "Definition:Closed Unit Ball", "Definition:Compact Linear Operator", "Definition:Compact Linear Operator", "Definition:Compact Topological Space/Subspace", "Closed Ball is Closed", "Set is Closed iff Equals Topological Closure", "Definition:Compact Topological Space/Subspace", "Normed Vector Space is ...
proofwiki-20530
Continuous Linear Operator over Infinite Dimensional Vector Space is not necessarily Invertible
Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot\,}_X}$ be a normed vector space. Let $\map {CL} X := \map {CL} {X, X}$ be a continuous linear transformation space. Let $I \in \map {CL} X$ be the identity element. Let $S, T \in \map {CL} X$. Suppose the dimension of $X$ is finite: :$d = \dim X = \infty$ Suppose $T \circ S = I$ where $...
Let $X, Y$ be $2$-sequence spaces. Let $T = L : X \to Y$ be the left shift operator. Let $S = R : X \to Y$ be the right shift operator. Let $x := \tuple {a_1, a_2, \ldots} \in X$. We have that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = L \circ R \circ x | r = \map L {\map R {\tuple{a_1, a_2, \ldots} } } }} {{eqn | r = \map L {\t...
Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot\,}_X}$ be a [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector space]]. Let $\map {CL} X := \map {CL} {X, X}$ be a [[Definition:Continuous Linear Transformation Space|continuous linear transformation space]]. Let $I \in \map {CL} X$ be the [[Definition:Identity Element|identity element]]....
Let $X, Y$ be [[Definition:P-Sequence Space|$2$-sequence spaces]]. Let $T = L : X \to Y$ be the [[Definition:Left Shift Operator|left shift operator]]. Let $S = R : X \to Y$ be the [[Definition:Right Shift Operator|right shift operator]]. Let $x := \tuple {a_1, a_2, \ldots} \in X$. We have that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eq...
Continuous Linear Operator over Infinite Dimensional Vector Space is not necessarily Invertible
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Linear_Operator_over_Infinite_Dimensional_Vector_Space_is_not_necessarily_Invertible
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Linear_Operator_over_Infinite_Dimensional_Vector_Space_is_not_necessarily_Invertible
[ "Continuous Linear Transformations", "Inverse Mappings" ]
[ "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Continuous Linear Transformation Space", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity", "Definition:Dimension of Vector Space", "Definition:Finite Cardinal", "Definition:Composition of Mappings", "Definition:Invertible Continuous Linear Operato...
[ "Definition:P-Sequence Space", "Definition:Left Shift Operator", "Definition:Right Shift Operator" ]
proofwiki-20531
Invertible Continuous Linear Operator has Unique Inverse
Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be the normed vector space. Let $\map {CL} X := \map {CL} {X, X}$ be a continuous linear transformation space. Let $I \in \map {CL} X$ be the identity element. Suppose $A \in \map {CL} X$ is invertible. Then there is a unique $B \in \map {CL} X$ such that $A \circ B = B \circ A =...
Let $B_1, B_2 \in \map {CL} X$. Suppose: :$A \circ B_1 = I = B_1 \circ A$ :$A \circ B_2 = I = B_2 \circ A$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = B_1 | r = I \circ B_1 | c = {{Defof|Identity Element}} }} {{eqn | r = B_2 \circ A \circ B_1 }} {{eqn | r = B_2 \circ I }} {{eqn | r = B_2 | c = {{Defof|Identity El...
Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be the [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector space]]. Let $\map {CL} X := \map {CL} {X, X}$ be a [[Definition:Continuous Linear Transformation Space|continuous linear transformation space]]. Let $I \in \map {CL} X$ be the [[Definition:Identity Element|identity element]...
Let $B_1, B_2 \in \map {CL} X$. Suppose: :$A \circ B_1 = I = B_1 \circ A$ :$A \circ B_2 = I = B_2 \circ A$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = B_1 | r = I \circ B_1 | c = {{Defof|Identity Element}} }} {{eqn | r = B_2 \circ A \circ B_1 }} {{eqn | r = B_2 \circ I }} {{eqn | r = B_2 | c = {{Defof|Identi...
Invertible Continuous Linear Operator has Unique Inverse
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Invertible_Continuous_Linear_Operator_has_Unique_Inverse
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Invertible_Continuous_Linear_Operator_has_Unique_Inverse
[ "Continuous Linear Transformations", "Inverse Mappings" ]
[ "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Continuous Linear Transformation Space", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity", "Definition:Invertible Continuous Linear Operator", "Definition:Unique" ]
[]
proofwiki-20532
Positive Part of Darboux Integrable Function is Integrable
Let $f$ be a real function that is Darboux integrable over $\closedint a b$. Let $f^+$ be the positive part of $f$. Then $f^+$ is Darboux integrable over $\closedint a b$.
Let $\epsilon > 0$ be a strictly positive real number. By Condition for Darboux Integrability, there is a finite subdivision $P = \sequence {x_i}_{0 \mathop \le i \mathop \le n}$ such that: :$\map {U_f} P - \map {L_f} P < \epsilon$ where $\map {U_f} P$ and $\map {L_f} P$ are the upper Darboux sum and lower Darboux sum,...
Let $f$ be a [[Definition:Real Function|real function]] that is [[Definition:Darboux Integrable Function|Darboux integrable]] over $\closedint a b$. Let $f^+$ be the [[Definition:Positive Part|positive part]] of $f$. Then $f^+$ is [[Definition:Darboux Integrable Function|Darboux integrable]] over $\closedint a b$.
Let $\epsilon > 0$ be a [[Definition:Strictly Positive Real Number|strictly positive real number]]. By [[Condition for Darboux Integrability]], there is a [[Definition:Finite Subdivision|finite subdivision]] $P = \sequence {x_i}_{0 \mathop \le i \mathop \le n}$ such that: :$\map {U_f} P - \map {L_f} P < \epsilon$ wher...
Positive Part of Darboux Integrable Function is Integrable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Positive_Part_of_Darboux_Integrable_Function_is_Integrable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Positive_Part_of_Darboux_Integrable_Function_is_Integrable
[ "Definite Integrals" ]
[ "Definition:Real Function", "Definition:Darboux Integrable Function", "Definition:Positive Part", "Definition:Darboux Integrable Function" ]
[ "Definition:Strictly Positive/Real Number", "Condition for Darboux Integrability", "Definition:Subdivision of Interval/Finite", "Definition:Upper Darboux Sum", "Definition:Lower Darboux Sum", "Supremum does not Precede Infimum", "Definition:Infimum of Mapping/Real-Valued Function", "Definition:Supremu...
proofwiki-20533
Positive Part of Darboux Integrable Function is Integrable/Negative Part
Let $f$ be a real function that is Darboux integrable over $\closedint a b$. Let $f^-$ be the negative part of $f$. Then $f^-$ is Darboux integrable over $\closedint a b$.
$f^-$ is the positive part of $\map g x = -\map f x$. From Linear Combination of Definite Integrals, it follows that: :$\ds \int_a^b \map g x \rd x = -\int_a^b \map f x \rd x$ Therefore, by Positive Part of Darboux Integrable Function is Integrable, $f^-$ is Darboux integrable over $\closedint a b$. {{qed}} Category:De...
Let $f$ be a [[Definition:Real Function|real function]] that is [[Definition:Darboux Integrable Function|Darboux integrable]] over $\closedint a b$. Let $f^-$ be the [[Definition:Negative Part|negative part]] of $f$. Then $f^-$ is [[Definition:Darboux Integrable Function|Darboux integrable]] over $\closedint a b$.
$f^-$ is the [[Definition:Positive Part|positive part]] of $\map g x = -\map f x$. From [[Linear Combination of Integrals/Definite|Linear Combination of Definite Integrals]], it follows that: :$\ds \int_a^b \map g x \rd x = -\int_a^b \map f x \rd x$ Therefore, by [[Positive Part of Darboux Integrable Function is Inte...
Positive Part of Darboux Integrable Function is Integrable/Negative Part
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Positive_Part_of_Darboux_Integrable_Function_is_Integrable/Negative_Part
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Positive_Part_of_Darboux_Integrable_Function_is_Integrable/Negative_Part
[ "Definite Integrals" ]
[ "Definition:Real Function", "Definition:Darboux Integrable Function", "Definition:Negative Part", "Definition:Darboux Integrable Function" ]
[ "Definition:Positive Part", "Linear Combination of Integrals/Definite", "Positive Part of Darboux Integrable Function is Integrable", "Definition:Darboux Integrable Function", "Category:Definite Integrals" ]
proofwiki-20534
Topological Evaluation Mapping is Continuous
Let $X$ be a topological space. Let $\family {Y_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an indexed family of topological spaces for some indexing set $I$. Let $\family {f_i : X \to Y_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an indexed family of continuous mappings. Let $\ds Y = \prod_{i \mathop \in I} Y_i$ be the product space of $\family {Y_i}_{i \...
For each $i \in I$, let: :$\pr_i : Y \to Y_i$ denote the $i$th projection on $Y$ From Composite of Evaluation Mapping and Projection: :$\forall i \in I : \pr_i \circ f = f_i$ By assumption: :$\forall i \in I : \pr_i \circ f$ is continuous From Continuous Mapping to Product Space: :$f$ is continuous {{qed}} Category:Eva...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $\family {Y_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an [[Definition:Indexed Family|indexed family]] of [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]] for some [[Definition:Indexing Set|indexing set]] $I$. Let $\family {f_i : X \to Y_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be ...
For each $i \in I$, let: :$\pr_i : Y \to Y_i$ denote the [[Definition:Projection (Mapping Theory)|$i$th projection]] on $Y$ From [[Composite of Evaluation Mapping and Projection]]: :$\forall i \in I : \pr_i \circ f = f_i$ By assumption: :$\forall i \in I : \pr_i \circ f$ is [[Definition:Continuous Mapping|continuous]...
Topological Evaluation Mapping is Continuous
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Topological_Evaluation_Mapping_is_Continuous
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Topological_Evaluation_Mapping_is_Continuous
[ "Evaluation Mappings (Topological Spaces)" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Indexing Set/Family", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Indexing Set", "Definition:Indexing Set/Family", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Product Space (Topology)", "Definition:Evaluation Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Co...
[ "Definition:Projection (Mapping Theory)", "Composite of Evaluation Mapping and Projection", "Definition:Continuous Mapping", "Continuous Mapping to Product Space", "Definition:Continuous Mapping", "Category:Evaluation Mappings (Topological Spaces)" ]
proofwiki-20535
Characterization for Topological Evaluation Mapping to be Embedding
Let $X$ be a topological space. Let $\family {Y_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an indexed family of topological spaces for some indexing set $I$. Let $\family {f_i : X \to Y_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an indexed family of continuous mappings. Let $\ds Y = \prod_{i \mathop \in I} Y_i$ be the product space of $\family {Y_i}_{i \...
=== Necessary Condition === Let $f$ be an embedding. {{:Characterization for Topological Evaluation Mapping to be Embedding/Necessary Condition}}{{qed|lemma}}
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $\family {Y_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an [[Definition:Indexed Family|indexed family]] of [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]] for some [[Definition:Indexing Set|indexing set]] $I$. Let $\family {f_i : X \to Y_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be ...
=== [[Characterization for Topological Evaluation Mapping to be Embedding/Necessary Condition|Necessary Condition]] === Let $f$ be an [[Definition:Embedding (Topology)|embedding]]. {{:Characterization for Topological Evaluation Mapping to be Embedding/Necessary Condition}}{{qed|lemma}}
Characterization for Topological Evaluation Mapping to be Embedding
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characterization_for_Topological_Evaluation_Mapping_to_be_Embedding
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characterization_for_Topological_Evaluation_Mapping_to_be_Embedding
[ "Evaluation Mappings (Topological Spaces)", "Embeddings (Topology)", "Characterization for Topological Evaluation Mapping to be Embedding" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Indexing Set/Family", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Indexing Set", "Definition:Indexing Set/Family", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Product Space (Topology)", "Definition:Evaluation Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Em...
[ "Characterization for Topological Evaluation Mapping to be Embedding/Necessary Condition", "Definition:Embedding (Topology)" ]
proofwiki-20536
Eigenvectors Corresponding to Distinct Eigenvalues of Linear Operator are Linearly Independent
Let $K$ be a field. Let $X$ be a vector space over $K$. Let $T : X \to X$ be a linear operator. Let $\lambda_1, \lambda_2, \ldots, \lambda_n \in K$ be distinct eigenvalues of $T$. Let $x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n$ be eigenvectors corresponding to $\lambda_1, \lambda_2, \ldots, \lambda_n$. Then $\set {x_1, \ldots, x_n}$ is...
Proof by induction: Let $\map P n$ be the proposition: :for any $n$ eigenvalues $\lambda_1, \lambda_2, \ldots, \lambda_n \in K$ and eigenvectors $x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n$ corresponding to $\lambda_1, \lambda_2, \ldots, \lambda_n$, we have that: ::$\set {x_1, \ldots, x_n}$ is a linearly independent set.
Let $K$ be a [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]]. Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Vector Space|vector space]] over $K$. Let $T : X \to X$ be a [[Definition:Linear Operator|linear operator]]. Let $\lambda_1, \lambda_2, \ldots, \lambda_n \in K$ be distinct [[Definition:Eigenvalue of Linear Operator|eigenvalues]]...
Proof by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]]: Let $\map P n$ be the proposition: :for any $n$ [[Definition:Eigenvalue of Linear Operator|eigenvalues]] $\lambda_1, \lambda_2, \ldots, \lambda_n \in K$ and [[Definition:Eigenvector of Linear Operator|eigenvectors]] $x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n$ corresponding to $...
Eigenvectors Corresponding to Distinct Eigenvalues of Linear Operator are Linearly Independent
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Eigenvectors_Corresponding_to_Distinct_Eigenvalues_of_Linear_Operator_are_Linearly_Independent
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Eigenvectors_Corresponding_to_Distinct_Eigenvalues_of_Linear_Operator_are_Linearly_Independent
[ "Eigenvalues of Linear Operators", "Linear Operators" ]
[ "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Vector Space", "Definition:Linear Operator", "Definition:Eigenvalue/Linear Operator", "Definition:Eigenvector/Linear Operator", "Definition:Linearly Independent/Set" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Eigenvalue/Linear Operator", "Definition:Eigenvector/Linear Operator", "Definition:Linearly Independent/Set", "Definition:Linearly Independent/Set", "Definition:Eigenvalue/Linear Operator", "Definition:Eigenvector/Linear Operator", "Definition:Linearl...
proofwiki-20537
Spectrum of Bounded Linear Operator contains Point Spectrum
Let $X$ be a Banach space over $\C$. Let $T : X \to X$ be a bounded linear operator. Let $\map {\sigma_p} T$ be the point spectrum of $T$. Let $\map \sigma T$ be the spectrum of $T$. Then $\map {\sigma_p} T \subseteq \map \sigma T$.
Let $\lambda \in \map {\sigma_p} T$. Then there exists $x \ne \mathbf 0_X$ such that $T x = \lambda x$. So $\paren {T - \lambda I} x = 0$ for some $x \ne \mathbf 0_X$. So $\ker T \ne \set {\mathbf 0_X}$. So from Linear Transformation is Injective iff Kernel Contains Only Zero, $T$ is not injective. So $T$ cannot be ...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Banach Space|Banach space]] over $\C$. Let $T : X \to X$ be a [[Definition:Bounded Linear Operator|bounded linear operator]]. Let $\map {\sigma_p} T$ be the [[Definition:Point Spectrum of Linear Operator|point spectrum]] of $T$. Let $\map \sigma T$ be the [[Definition:Spectrum of Bounded ...
Let $\lambda \in \map {\sigma_p} T$. Then there exists $x \ne \mathbf 0_X$ such that $T x = \lambda x$. So $\paren {T - \lambda I} x = 0$ for some $x \ne \mathbf 0_X$. So $\ker T \ne \set {\mathbf 0_X}$. So from [[Linear Transformation is Injective iff Kernel Contains Only Zero]], $T$ is not [[Definition:Injectiv...
Spectrum of Bounded Linear Operator contains Point Spectrum
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Spectrum_of_Bounded_Linear_Operator_contains_Point_Spectrum
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Spectrum_of_Bounded_Linear_Operator_contains_Point_Spectrum
[ "Point Spectra (Linear Operators)", "Spectra (Bounded Linear Operators)" ]
[ "Definition:Banach Space", "Definition:Bounded Linear Operator", "Definition:Point Spectrum of Linear Operator", "Definition:Spectrum (Spectral Theory)/Bounded Linear Operator" ]
[ "Linear Transformation is Injective iff Kernel Contains Only Zero", "Definition:Injective", "Definition:Invertible Bounded Linear Operator", "Category:Point Spectra (Linear Operators)", "Category:Spectra (Bounded Linear Operators)" ]
proofwiki-20538
Spectrum of Bounded Linear Operator on Finite-Dimensional Banach Space is equal to Point Spectrum
Let $X$ be a finite-dimensional Banach space over $\C$. Let $T : X \to X$ be a bounded linear operator. Let $\map {\sigma_p} T$ be the point spectrum of $T$. Let $\map \sigma T$ be the spectrum of $T$. Then $\map \sigma T = \map {\sigma_p} T$.
We have that $\lambda \in \map \sigma T$ {{iff}} $T - \lambda I$ is not invertible as a bounded linear transformation. So $T - \lambda I$ is not bijective or its inverse $\paren {T - \lambda I}^{-1}$ is not bounded. From Linear Transformations between Finite-Dimensional Normed Vector Spaces are Continuous, every linear...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Finite Dimensional Vector Space|finite-dimensional]] [[Definition:Banach Space|Banach space]] over $\C$. Let $T : X \to X$ be a [[Definition:Bounded Linear Operator|bounded linear operator]]. Let $\map {\sigma_p} T$ be the [[Definition:Point Spectrum of Linear Operator|point spectrum]] of $...
We have that $\lambda \in \map \sigma T$ {{iff}} $T - \lambda I$ is not [[Definition:Invertible Bounded Linear Transformation|invertible as a bounded linear transformation]]. So $T - \lambda I$ is not [[Definition:Bijective|bijective]] or its [[Definition:Inverse Mapping|inverse]] $\paren {T - \lambda I}^{-1}$ is not ...
Spectrum of Bounded Linear Operator on Finite-Dimensional Banach Space is equal to Point Spectrum
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Spectrum_of_Bounded_Linear_Operator_on_Finite-Dimensional_Banach_Space_is_equal_to_Point_Spectrum
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Spectrum_of_Bounded_Linear_Operator_on_Finite-Dimensional_Banach_Space_is_equal_to_Point_Spectrum
[ "Spectra (Bounded Linear Operators)", "Point Spectra (Linear Operators)", "Finite Dimensional Vector Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Dimension of Vector Space/Finite", "Definition:Banach Space", "Definition:Bounded Linear Operator", "Definition:Point Spectrum of Linear Operator", "Definition:Spectrum (Spectral Theory)/Bounded Linear Operator" ]
[ "Definition:Invertible Bounded Linear Transformation", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Inverse Mapping", "Definition:Bounded Linear Operator", "Linear Transformations between Finite-Dimensional Normed Vector Spaces are Continuous", "Definition:Linear Operator", "Definition:Bounded Linear Operator", ...
proofwiki-20539
Evaluation Mapping on T1 Space is Embedding if Mappings Separate Points from Closed Sets
Let $X$ be a $T_1$ topological space. Let $\family {Y_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an indexed family of topological spaces for some indexing set $I$. Let $\family {f_i : X \to Y_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an indexed family of continuous mappings. Let $\family {f_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ separate points from closed sets. Let $\d...
Let $\BB = \set{f_i^{-1} \sqbrk V : i \in I, V \text{ is open in } Y_i}$. From Preimage of Open Sets forms Basis if Continuous Mappings Separate Points from Closed Sets: :$\BB$ is a basis for $X$ From Analytic Basis is Analytic Sub-Basis: :$\BB$ is a sub-basis for $X$ By definition of a $T_1$ space: :all points of $X$ ...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:T1 Space|$T_1$ topological space]]. Let $\family {Y_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an [[Definition:Indexed Family|indexed family]] of [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]] for some [[Definition:Indexing Set|indexing set]] $I$. Let $\family {f_i : X \to Y_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an ...
Let $\BB = \set{f_i^{-1} \sqbrk V : i \in I, V \text{ is open in } Y_i}$. From [[Preimage of Open Sets forms Basis if Continuous Mappings Separate Points from Closed Sets]]: :$\BB$ is a [[Definition:Analytic Basis|basis]] for $X$ From [[Analytic Basis is Analytic Sub-Basis]]: :$\BB$ is a [[Definition:Analytic Sub-Ba...
Evaluation Mapping on T1 Space is Embedding if Mappings Separate Points from Closed Sets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Evaluation_Mapping_on_T1_Space_is_Embedding_if_Mappings_Separate_Points_from_Closed_Sets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Evaluation_Mapping_on_T1_Space_is_Embedding_if_Mappings_Separate_Points_from_Closed_Sets
[ "Continuous Mappings", "Embeddings (Topology)" ]
[ "Definition:T1 Space", "Definition:Indexing Set/Family", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Indexing Set", "Definition:Indexing Set/Family", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Mappings Separating Points from Closed Sets", "Definition:Product Space (Topology)", "Definiti...
[ "Preimage of Open Sets forms Basis if Continuous Mappings Separate Points from Closed Sets", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis", "Analytic Basis is Analytic Sub-Basis", "Definition:Sub-Basis/Analytic Sub-Basis", "Definition:T1 Space", "Definition:Closed Point", "Definition:Mappings Separating ...
proofwiki-20540
Subspace of Product Space has Initial Topology with respect to Restricted Projections
Let $\family {\struct {X_i, \tau_i} }_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an indexed family of topological spaces where $I$ is an arbitrary index set. Let $\XX$ be the cartesian product of $\family {X_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$: :$\ds \XX := \prod_{i \mathop \in I} X_i$ For each $i \in I$, let $\pr_i: \XX \to X_i$ denote the projection o...
By definition of product topology: :$\tau_\XX$ is the initial topology with respect to the mappings $\family {\pr_i : \XX \to X_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ From Subspace Topology on Initial Topology is Initial Topology on Restrictions: :$\tau_Y$ is the initial topology on $Y$ with respect to the mappings $\family {\pr_i \res...
Let $\family {\struct {X_i, \tau_i} }_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an [[Definition:Indexed Family|indexed family]] of [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]] where $I$ is an arbitrary [[Definition:Indexing Set|index set]]. Let $\XX$ be the [[Definition:Cartesian Product of Family|cartesian product]] of $\family {...
By definition of [[Definition:Product Topology|product topology]]: :$\tau_\XX$ is the [[Definition:Initial Topology|initial topology]] with respect to the [[Definition:Mapping|mappings]] $\family {\pr_i : \XX \to X_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ From [[Subspace Topology on Initial Topology is Initial Topology on Restrictions]]...
Subspace of Product Space has Initial Topology with respect to Restricted Projections
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subspace_of_Product_Space_has_Initial_Topology_with_respect_to_Restricted_Projections
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subspace_of_Product_Space_has_Initial_Topology_with_respect_to_Restricted_Projections
[ "Product Topology", "Topological Subspaces", "Initial Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Indexing Set/Family", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Indexing Set", "Definition:Cartesian Product/Family of Sets", "Definition:Projection (Mapping Theory)", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Restriction/Mapping", "Definition:Product Topology", "D...
[ "Definition:Product Topology", "Definition:Initial Topology", "Definition:Mapping", "Subspace Topology on Initial Topology is Initial Topology on Restrictions", "Definition:Initial Topology", "Definition:Mapping", "Category:Product Topology", "Category:Topological Subspaces", "Category:Initial Topol...
proofwiki-20541
Invertible Continuous Linear Operator is Bijective
Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be the normed vector space. Let $\map {CL} X := \map {CL} {X, X}$ be a continuous linear transformation space. Let $I \in \map {CL} X$ be the identity element. Suppose $A \in \map {CL} X$ is invertible. Then $A$ is bijective.
=== $A$ is injective === Let $x, y \in X$ be such that $\map A x = \map A y$. Then: :$A^{-1} \circ \map A x = A^{-1} \circ \map A y$ where $A^{-1}$ is the inverse of $A$. By definition: :$A^{-1} \circ A = I$ Hence: :$x = y$ By definition, $A$ is injective. {{qed|lemma}}
Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be the [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector space]]. Let $\map {CL} X := \map {CL} {X, X}$ be a [[Definition:Continuous Linear Transformation Space|continuous linear transformation space]]. Let $I \in \map {CL} X$ be the [[Definition:Identity Element|identity element]...
=== $A$ is [[Definition:Injection/Definition 1|injective]] === Let $x, y \in X$ be such that $\map A x = \map A y$. Then: :$A^{-1} \circ \map A x = A^{-1} \circ \map A y$ where $A^{-1}$ is the [[Definition:Inverse of Continuous Linear Operator|inverse of $A$]]. By [[Definition:Inverse of Continuous Linear Operator...
Invertible Continuous Linear Operator is Bijective
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Invertible_Continuous_Linear_Operator_is_Bijective
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Invertible_Continuous_Linear_Operator_is_Bijective
[ "Continuous Linear Transformations", "Bijections" ]
[ "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Continuous Linear Transformation Space", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity", "Definition:Invertible Continuous Linear Operator", "Definition:Bijection" ]
[ "Definition:Injection/Definition 1", "Definition:Inverse of Continuous Linear Operator", "Definition:Inverse of Continuous Linear Operator", "Definition:Injection/Definition 1" ]
proofwiki-20542
Power Series Expansion for Reciprocal of Square Root of 1 - x
Let $x \in \R$ such that $-1 < x \le 1$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \dfrac 1 {\sqrt {1 - x} } | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {\paren {2 k}!} {\paren {2^k k!}^2} x^k | c = }} {{eqn | r = 1 + \frac 1 2 x + \frac {1 \times 3} {2 \times 4} x^2 + \frac {1 \times 3 \times 5} {2 \times 4 \times 6} x...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \frac 1 {\sqrt {1 - x} } | r = \paren {1 - x}^{-\frac 1 2} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {\paren {-\frac 1 2}^{\underline k} } {k!} \paren {-x}^k | c = General Binomial Theorem }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {\ds \prod_{j \mathop = ...
Let $x \in \R$ such that $-1 < x \le 1$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \dfrac 1 {\sqrt {1 - x} } | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {\paren {2 k}!} {\paren {2^k k!}^2} x^k | c = }} {{eqn | r = 1 + \frac 1 2 x + \frac {1 \times 3} {2 \times 4} x^2 + \frac {1 \times 3 \times 5} {2 \times 4 \times 6}...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \frac 1 {\sqrt {1 - x} } | r = \paren {1 - x}^{-\frac 1 2} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {\paren {-\frac 1 2}^{\underline k} } {k!} \paren {-x}^k | c = [[General Binomial Theorem]] }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {\ds \prod_{j \matho...
Power Series Expansion for Reciprocal of Square Root of 1 - x/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Power_Series_Expansion_for_Reciprocal_of_Square_Root_of_1_-_x
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Power_Series_Expansion_for_Reciprocal_of_Square_Root_of_1_-_x/Proof_2
[ "Power Series Expansion for Reciprocal of Square Root of 1 - x", "Examples of Power Series" ]
[]
[ "Binomial Theorem/General Binomial Theorem", "Translation of Index Variable of Product", "Definition:Fraction/Numerator", "Definition:Fraction/Denominator" ]
proofwiki-20543
Bijective Continuous Linear Operator is not necessarily Invertible
Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be the normed vector space. Let $\map {CL} X := \map {CL} {X, X}$ be a continuous linear transformation space. Let $I \in \map {CL} X$ be the identity element. Suppose $A \in \map {CL} X$ is bijective. Then $A$ is not necessarily invertible.
Let $\mathbb F \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\map {c_{00} } {\mathbb F}$ be the space of almost-zero sequences on $\mathbb F$. Let $\mathbf x = \tuple {x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_N, 0, \ldots} \in c_{00}$. Let $A : c_{00} \to c_{00}$ be a mapping such that: :$\map A {\tuple {x_1, x_2, x_3, \ldots} } = \tuple {x_1, \dfrac {x_2} 2,...
Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be the [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector space]]. Let $\map {CL} X := \map {CL} {X, X}$ be a [[Definition:Continuous Linear Transformation Space|continuous linear transformation space]]. Let $I \in \map {CL} X$ be the [[Definition:Identity Element|identity element]...
Let $\mathbb F \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\map {c_{00} } {\mathbb F}$ be the [[Definition:Space of Almost-Zero Sequences|space of almost-zero sequences]] on $\mathbb F$. Let $\mathbf x = \tuple {x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_N, 0, \ldots} \in c_{00}$. Let $A : c_{00} \to c_{00}$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]] such that: ...
Bijective Continuous Linear Operator is not necessarily Invertible
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Bijective_Continuous_Linear_Operator_is_not_necessarily_Invertible
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Bijective_Continuous_Linear_Operator_is_not_necessarily_Invertible
[ "Continuous Linear Transformations", "Bijections", "Inverse Mappings" ]
[ "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Continuous Linear Transformation Space", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Logical Not", "Definition:Conditional/Necessary Condition", "Definition:Invertible Continuous Linear Operator" ]
[ "Definition:Space of Almost-Zero Sequences", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Space of Bounded Sequences/Normed Vector Space", "Space of Almost-Zero Sequences is Subspace of Space of Bounded Sequences", "Space of Almost-Zero Sequences with Supremum Norm is Normed Vector Space" ]
proofwiki-20544
Linear Transformation has Finite Rank iff Domain Quotiented by Kernel is Finite Dimensional
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ and $Y$ be normed vector spaces over $\GF$. Let $T : X \to Y$ be a linear transformation. Let $\ker T$ be the kernel of $T$. Let $X/\ker T$ be the quotient vector space of $X$ modulo $\ker T$. Then $T$ has finite rank {{iff}} $X/\ker T$ is finite dimensional.
Let $q : X \to X/\ker T$ be the quotient mapping.
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ and $Y$ be [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector spaces]] over $\GF$. Let $T : X \to Y$ be a [[Definition:Linear Transformation|linear transformation]]. Let $\ker T$ be the [[Definition:Kernel of Linear Transformation|kernel]] of $T$. Let $X/\ker T$ be the [[Definiti...
Let $q : X \to X/\ker T$ be the [[Definition:Quotient Mapping|quotient mapping]].
Linear Transformation has Finite Rank iff Domain Quotiented by Kernel is Finite Dimensional
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Linear_Transformation_has_Finite_Rank_iff_Domain_Quotiented_by_Kernel_is_Finite_Dimensional
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Linear_Transformation_has_Finite_Rank_iff_Domain_Quotiented_by_Kernel_is_Finite_Dimensional
[ "Finite Rank Operators", "Quotient Vector Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Linear Transformation", "Definition:Kernel of Linear Transformation", "Definition:Quotient Vector Space", "Definition:Finite Rank Operator", "Definition:Dimension of Vector Space/Finite" ]
[ "Definition:Quotient Mapping" ]
proofwiki-20545
Power Series Expansion for Square Root of 1 - x
Let $x \in \R$ such that $-1 < x \le 1$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sqrt {1 - x} | r = 1 - \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^\infty \frac {\paren {2 \paren {k - 1} }!} {2^{2 k - 1} k! \paren {k - 1}!} x^k | c = }} {{eqn | r = 1 - \frac 1 2 x - \frac 1 {2 \times 4} x^2 - \frac {1 \times 3} {2 \times 4 \times 6} x^...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sqrt {1 + x} | r = 1 + \frac 1 2 x - \frac 1 {2 \times 4} x^2 + \frac {1 \times 3} {2 \times 4 \times 6} x^3 - \cdots | c = Power Series Expansion for $\sqrt {1 + x}$ }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \sqrt {1 - x} | r = 1 + \frac 1 2 \paren {-x} - \frac 1 {2 \times 4} \pa...
Let $x \in \R$ such that $-1 < x \le 1$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sqrt {1 - x} | r = 1 - \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^\infty \frac {\paren {2 \paren {k - 1} }!} {2^{2 k - 1} k! \paren {k - 1}!} x^k | c = }} {{eqn | r = 1 - \frac 1 2 x - \frac 1 {2 \times 4} x^2 - \frac {1 \times 3} {2 \times 4 \times 6} ...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sqrt {1 + x} | r = 1 + \frac 1 2 x - \frac 1 {2 \times 4} x^2 + \frac {1 \times 3} {2 \times 4 \times 6} x^3 - \cdots | c = [[Power Series Expansion for Square Root of 1 + x|Power Series Expansion for $\sqrt {1 + x}$]] }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \sqrt {1 - x} | r = ...
Power Series Expansion for Square Root of 1 - x
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Power_Series_Expansion_for_Square_Root_of_1_-_x
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Power_Series_Expansion_for_Square_Root_of_1_-_x
[ "Examples of Power Series" ]
[]
[ "Power Series Expansion for Square Root of 1 + x" ]
proofwiki-20546
Non-Zero Subspace of Topological Vector Space is not von Neumann-Bounded
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a topological vector space over $\GF$. Let $Y \ne \set {\mathbf 0_X}$ be a non-trivial subspace of $X$. Then $Y$ is not von Neumann-bounded.
Let $x \in Y \setminus \set {\mathbf 0_X}$. Then $t x \in Y$ for $t > 0$. Since $X$ is Hausdorff, there exists an open neighborhood $V$ of $x$ that does not contain $\mathbf 0_X$. Then $t x \not \in t V$ for each $t > 0$. So we do not have $Y \subseteq t V$ for any $t > 0$. So $Y$ is not von Neumann-bounded. {{qed}}
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Topological Vector Space|topological vector space]] over $\GF$. Let $Y \ne \set {\mathbf 0_X}$ be a [[Definition:Zero Subspace|non-trivial subspace]] of $X$. Then $Y$ is not [[Definition:Von Neumann-Bounded Subset of Topological Vector Space|von Neumann-boun...
Let $x \in Y \setminus \set {\mathbf 0_X}$. Then $t x \in Y$ for $t > 0$. Since $X$ is [[Definition:Hausdorff Space|Hausdorff]], there exists an [[Definition:Open Neighborhood|open neighborhood]] $V$ of $x$ that does not contain $\mathbf 0_X$. Then $t x \not \in t V$ for each $t > 0$. So we do not have $Y \subset...
Non-Zero Subspace of Topological Vector Space is not von Neumann-Bounded
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Non-Zero_Subspace_of_Topological_Vector_Space_is_not_von_Neumann-Bounded
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Non-Zero_Subspace_of_Topological_Vector_Space_is_not_von_Neumann-Bounded
[ "Von Neumann-Bounded Subsets of Topological Vector Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Zero Subspace", "Definition:Von Neumann-Bounded Subset of Topological Vector Space" ]
[ "Definition:T2 Space", "Definition:Open Neighborhood", "Definition:Von Neumann-Bounded Subset of Topological Vector Space" ]
proofwiki-20547
Linear Transformation between Normed Vector Spaces is Bounded iff Bounded as Linear Transformation between Topological Vector Spaces
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_X}$ and $\struct {Y, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_Y}$ be normed vector spaces over $\GF$. Let $T : X \to Y$ be linear transformations. Then $T$ is bounded as a linear transformation between normed vector spaces {{iff}} it is bounded as a linear transformation b...
=== Sufficient Condition === Suppose that $T$ is bounded as a linear transformation between topological vector spaces Then: :for each von Neumann-bounded subset $E$ of $X$, $T \sqbrk E$ is von Neumann-bounded. From Characterization of von Neumann-Boundedness in Normed Vector Space, this is equivalent to: :if $E \subse...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_X}$ and $\struct {Y, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_Y}$ be [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector spaces]] over $\GF$. Let $T : X \to Y$ be [[Definition:Linear Transformation|linear transformations]]. Then $T$ is [[Definition:Bounded Linear Transforma...
=== Sufficient Condition === Suppose that $T$ is [[Definition:Bounded Linear Transformation/Topological Vector Space|bounded as a linear transformation between topological vector spaces]] Then: :for each [[Definition:Von Neumann-Bounded Subset of Topological Vector Space|von Neumann-bounded subset]] $E$ of $X$, $T \...
Linear Transformation between Normed Vector Spaces is Bounded iff Bounded as Linear Transformation between Topological Vector Spaces
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Linear_Transformation_between_Normed_Vector_Spaces_is_Bounded_iff_Bounded_as_Linear_Transformation_between_Topological_Vector_Spaces
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Linear_Transformation_between_Normed_Vector_Spaces_is_Bounded_iff_Bounded_as_Linear_Transformation_between_Topological_Vector_Spaces
[ "Bounded Linear Transformations (Topological Vector Spaces)", "Bounded Linear Transformations" ]
[ "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Linear Transformation", "Definition:Bounded Linear Transformation/Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Bounded Linear Transformation/Topological Vector Space" ]
[ "Definition:Bounded Linear Transformation/Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Von Neumann-Bounded Subset of Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Von Neumann-Bounded Subset of Topological Vector Space", "Characterization of von Neumann-Boundedness in Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Bounded Linear Tran...
proofwiki-20548
Homeomorphic Topology of Initial Topology is Initial Topology
Let $\struct {X_\alpha, \tau_\alpha}, \struct {X_\beta, \tau_\beta}$ be topological spaces. Let $\ds \family {\struct {Y_i, \tau_i} }_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an indexed family of topological spaces where $I$ is an arbitrary index set. Let $\ds \family {f_i: X_\beta \to Y_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an indexed family of mapp...
Let $\SS_\beta = \set {f_i^{-1} \sqbrk U: i \in I, U \in \tau_i}$. By definition of initial topology: :$\SS_\beta$ is a sub-basis for $\tau_\beta$ From Inverse of Homeomorphism is Homeomorphism: :$\phi^{-1}$ is a homeomorphism From Homeomorphic Image of Sub-Basis is Sub-Basis: :$\SS_\alpha = \set {\phi^{-1} \sqbrk {f_...
Let $\struct {X_\alpha, \tau_\alpha}, \struct {X_\beta, \tau_\beta}$ be [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]]. Let $\ds \family {\struct {Y_i, \tau_i} }_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an [[Definition:Indexed Family|indexed family]] of [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]] where $I$ is an arbitrary ...
Let $\SS_\beta = \set {f_i^{-1} \sqbrk U: i \in I, U \in \tau_i}$. By definition of [[Definition:Initial Topology|initial topology]]: :$\SS_\beta$ is a [[Definition:Analytic Sub-Basis|sub-basis]] for $\tau_\beta$ From [[Inverse of Homeomorphism is Homeomorphism]]: :$\phi^{-1}$ is a [[Definition:Homeomorphism (Topol...
Homeomorphic Topology of Initial Topology is Initial Topology
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Homeomorphic_Topology_of_Initial_Topology_is_Initial_Topology
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Homeomorphic_Topology_of_Initial_Topology_is_Initial_Topology
[ "Homeomorphisms (Topological Spaces)", "Initial Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Indexing Set/Family", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Indexing Set", "Definition:Indexing Set/Family", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Indexing Set", "Definition:Initial Topology", "Definition:Homeomorphism/Topological Spaces", "Definition:...
[ "Definition:Initial Topology", "Definition:Sub-Basis/Analytic Sub-Basis", "Inverse of Homeomorphism is Homeomorphism", "Definition:Homeomorphism/Topological Spaces", "Homeomorphic Image of Sub-Basis is Sub-Basis", "Definition:Sub-Basis/Analytic Sub-Basis", "Preimage of Subset under Composite Mapping", ...
proofwiki-20549
Net Characterization of von Neumann-Boundedness in Topological Vector Space
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a topological vector space over $\GF$. Let $E \subseteq X$. Let $\struct {\Lambda, \preceq}$ be a directed set. Let $E$ be von Neumann-bounded. Then: :for each net $\sequence {x_\lambda}_{\lambda \mathop \in \Lambda}$ in $E$ and each net $\sequence {\alpha_\lambda}_{\lambda \mat...
=== Necessary Condition === Let $E \subseteq X$ be von Neumann-bounded. Let $\sequence {x_\lambda}_{\lambda \mathop \in \Lambda}$ be a net in $E$. Let $\sequence {\alpha_\lambda}_{\lambda \mathop \in \Lambda}$ be a net in $\GF$ such that $\alpha_\lambda \to 0$. Let $U$ be an open neighborhood of ${\mathbf 0}_X$. From...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Topological Vector Space|topological vector space]] over $\GF$. Let $E \subseteq X$. Let $\struct {\Lambda, \preceq}$ be a [[Definition:Directed Set|directed set]]. Let $E$ be [[Definition:Von Neumann-Bounded Subset of Topological Vector Space|von Neumann-boun...
=== Necessary Condition === Let $E \subseteq X$ be [[Definition:Von Neumann-Bounded Subset of Topological Vector Space|von Neumann-bounded]]. Let $\sequence {x_\lambda}_{\lambda \mathop \in \Lambda}$ be a [[Definition:Net (Set Theory)|net]] in $E$. Let $\sequence {\alpha_\lambda}_{\lambda \mathop \in \Lambda}$ be a...
Net Characterization of von Neumann-Boundedness in Topological Vector Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Net_Characterization_of_von_Neumann-Boundedness_in_Topological_Vector_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Net_Characterization_of_von_Neumann-Boundedness_in_Topological_Vector_Space
[ "Von Neumann-Bounded Subsets of Topological Vector Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Directed Preordering", "Definition:Von Neumann-Bounded Subset of Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Net", "Definition:Net", "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Von Neumann-Bounded Subset of Topological Vector Space" ]
[ "Definition:Von Neumann-Bounded Subset of Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Net (Set Theory)", "Definition:Net (Set Theory)", "Definition:Open Neighborhood", "Open Neighborhood of Origin in Topological Vector Space contains Balanced Open Neighborhood", "Definition:Balanced Set", "Definition:Open Ne...
proofwiki-20550
Primitive of Reciprocal of 1 plus Sine of a x/Corollary
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} {1 + \sin x} = \map \tan {\frac x 2 - \frac \pi 4} + C$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int \frac {\d x} {1 + \sin a x} | r = -\frac 1 a \map \tan {\frac \pi 4 - \frac {a x} 2} + C | c = Primitive of $\dfrac 1 {1 + \sin a x}$ }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \int \frac {\d x} {1 + \sin x} | r = -\map \tan {\frac \pi 4 - \frac x 2} + C | c = setting $a ...
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} {1 + \sin x} = \map \tan {\frac x 2 - \frac \pi 4} + C$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int \frac {\d x} {1 + \sin a x} | r = -\frac 1 a \map \tan {\frac \pi 4 - \frac {a x} 2} + C | c = [[Primitive of Reciprocal of 1 plus Sine of a x|Primitive of $\dfrac 1 {1 + \sin a x}$]] }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \int \frac {\d x} {1 + \sin x} | r = -\map \tan {\f...
Primitive of Reciprocal of 1 plus Sine of a x/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal_of_1_plus_Sine_of_a_x/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal_of_1_plus_Sine_of_a_x/Corollary
[ "Primitive of Reciprocal of 1 plus Sine of a x" ]
[]
[ "Primitive of Reciprocal of 1 plus Sine of a x", "Tangent Function is Odd" ]
proofwiki-20551
Newton's Method/Sequence of Approximations Converges Quadratically
Let $\map f x$ be a real function. Let $\alpha$ be a root of $\map f x$. Let $\epsilon > 0$ be a positive real number, and $I = \closedint {\alpha - \epsilon} {\alpha + \epsilon}$. Let $f$ have a continuous second derivative on $I$. Let $\ds M = \map \sup {\size {\frac {\map {f' '} s} {\map {f'} t} } }$ over all $s, t ...
Suppose that the sequence is produced up to $x_n$. Suppose also that $x_n \in I$. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map f {x_n} + \paren {\alpha - x_n} \map {f'} {x_n} + \frac {\map {f' '} {\zeta_n} } 2 \paren {\alpha - x_n}^2 | r = \map f \alpha | c = Taylor's Theorem, for some $\zeta_n \in \openint {x_n} \alpha$...
Let $\map f x$ be a [[Definition:Real Function|real function]]. Let $\alpha$ be a [[Definition:Root of Function|root]] of $\map f x$. Let $\epsilon > 0$ be a [[Definition:Strictly Positive Real Number|positive real number]], and $I = \closedint {\alpha - \epsilon} {\alpha + \epsilon}$. Let $f$ have a [[Definition:Co...
Suppose that the sequence is produced up to $x_n$. Suppose also that $x_n \in I$. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map f {x_n} + \paren {\alpha - x_n} \map {f'} {x_n} + \frac {\map {f' '} {\zeta_n} } 2 \paren {\alpha - x_n}^2 | r = \map f \alpha | c = [[Taylor's Theorem]], for some $\zeta_n \in \openint {x_n} \...
Newton's Method/Sequence of Approximations Converges Quadratically
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Newton's_Method/Sequence_of_Approximations_Converges_Quadratically
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Newton's_Method/Sequence_of_Approximations_Converges_Quadratically
[ "Newton's Method" ]
[ "Definition:Real Function", "Definition:Root of Mapping", "Definition:Strictly Positive/Real Number", "Definition:Continuous Real Function/Subset", "Definition:Derivative/Higher Derivatives/Second Derivative", "Definition:Non-Vanishing", "Newton's Method", "Definition:Convergent Sequence/Real Numbers"...
[ "Taylor's Theorem", "Newton's Method", "Principle of Mathematical Induction/Zero-Based", "Principle of Recursive Definition", "Principle of Mathematical Induction/Zero-Based", "Definition:Order of Convergence" ]
proofwiki-20552
Primitive of Reciprocal of 1 minus Sine of a x/Corollary 2
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} {1 - \sin x} = -\map \cot {\frac x 2 - \frac \pi 4} + C$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int \frac {\d x} {1 - \sin a x} | r = \map \tan {\frac x 2 + \frac \pi 4} + C | c = Primitive of $\dfrac 1 {1 - \sin x}$: Tangent form }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac \pi 2 - \map \cot {\frac \pi 4 + \frac x 2} + C | c = setting $a \gets 1$ }} {{eqn | r = | c = }} {{end-eqn}} ...
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} {1 - \sin x} = -\map \cot {\frac x 2 - \frac \pi 4} + C$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int \frac {\d x} {1 - \sin a x} | r = \map \tan {\frac x 2 + \frac \pi 4} + C | c = [[Primitive of Reciprocal of 1 minus Sine of a x/Corollary 1|Primitive of $\dfrac 1 {1 - \sin x}$: Tangent form]] }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac \pi 2 - \map \cot {\frac \pi 4 + \frac x 2} + C | c = s...
Primitive of Reciprocal of 1 minus Sine of a x/Corollary 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal_of_1_minus_Sine_of_a_x/Corollary_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal_of_1_minus_Sine_of_a_x/Corollary_2
[ "Primitive of Reciprocal of 1 minus Sine of a x" ]
[]
[ "Primitive of Reciprocal of 1 minus Sine of a x/Corollary 1" ]
proofwiki-20553
Primitive of Reciprocal of 1 minus Sine of a x/Corollary 1
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} {1 - \sin x} = \map \tan {\frac x 2 + \frac \pi 4} + C$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int \frac {\d x} {1 - \sin a x} | r = \frac 1 a \map \tan {\frac \pi 4 + \frac {a x} 2} + C | c = Primitive of $\dfrac 1 {1 - \sin a x}$ }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \int \frac {\d x} {1 - \sin x} | r = \map \tan {\frac \pi 4 + \frac x 2} + C | c = setting $a \g...
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} {1 - \sin x} = \map \tan {\frac x 2 + \frac \pi 4} + C$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int \frac {\d x} {1 - \sin a x} | r = \frac 1 a \map \tan {\frac \pi 4 + \frac {a x} 2} + C | c = [[Primitive of Reciprocal of 1 minus Sine of a x|Primitive of $\dfrac 1 {1 - \sin a x}$]] }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \int \frac {\d x} {1 - \sin x} | r = \map \tan {\fr...
Primitive of Reciprocal of 1 minus Sine of a x/Corollary 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal_of_1_minus_Sine_of_a_x/Corollary_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal_of_1_minus_Sine_of_a_x/Corollary_1
[ "Primitive of Reciprocal of 1 minus Sine of a x" ]
[]
[ "Primitive of Reciprocal of 1 minus Sine of a x" ]
proofwiki-20554
Homeomorphic Image of Sub-Basis is Sub-Basis
Let $T_\alpha = \struct{X_\alpha, \tau_\alpha}, T_\beta = \struct{X_\beta, \tau_\beta}$ be topological spaces. Let $\SS_\alpha \subseteq \tau_\alpha$ be a sub-basis for $\tau_\alpha$. Let $\phi: T_\alpha \to T_\beta$ be a homeomorphism. Let $\SS_\beta = \set{\phi \sqbrk S : S \in \SS_\alpha}$. Then: :$\SS_\beta$ is a s...
By definition of homeomorphism: :$\forall U \subseteq X_\alpha : U \in \tau_\alpha \iff \phi \sqbrk U \in \tau_\beta$ By definition of sub-basis: :$\SS_\alpha \subseteq \tau_\alpha$ Hence: :$\SS_\beta \subseteq \tau_\beta$ Let $\ds \BB_\alpha = \set {\bigcap \FF: \FF \subseteq \SS_\alpha, \FF \text{ is finite} }$. Let ...
Let $T_\alpha = \struct{X_\alpha, \tau_\alpha}, T_\beta = \struct{X_\beta, \tau_\beta}$ be [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]]. Let $\SS_\alpha \subseteq \tau_\alpha$ be a [[Definition:Analytic Sub-Basis|sub-basis]] for $\tau_\alpha$. Let $\phi: T_\alpha \to T_\beta$ be a [[Definition:Homeomorphism (...
By definition of [[Definition:Homeomorphism (Topological Spaces)|homeomorphism]]: :$\forall U \subseteq X_\alpha : U \in \tau_\alpha \iff \phi \sqbrk U \in \tau_\beta$ By definition of [[Definition:Analytic Sub-Basis|sub-basis]]: :$\SS_\alpha \subseteq \tau_\alpha$ Hence: :$\SS_\beta \subseteq \tau_\beta$ Let $\ds ...
Homeomorphic Image of Sub-Basis is Sub-Basis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Homeomorphic_Image_of_Sub-Basis_is_Sub-Basis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Homeomorphic_Image_of_Sub-Basis_is_Sub-Basis
[ "Homeomorphisms (Topological Spaces)", "Topological Bases" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Sub-Basis/Analytic Sub-Basis", "Definition:Homeomorphism/Topological Spaces", "Definition:Sub-Basis/Analytic Sub-Basis" ]
[ "Definition:Homeomorphism/Topological Spaces", "Definition:Sub-Basis/Analytic Sub-Basis", "Image of Intersection under Injection", "Inverse of Homeomorphism is Homeomorphism", "Definition:Homeomorphism/Topological Spaces", "Definition:Homeomorphism/Topological Spaces", "Definition:Sub-Basis/Analytic Sub...
proofwiki-20555
Image of von Neumann-Bounded Set under Equicontinuous Family of Linear Transformations is Contained in von Neumann-Bounded Set
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ and $Y$ be a topological vector space over $\GF$. Let $\family {T_\alpha}_{\alpha \in I}$ be an equicontinuous family of linear transformations. Let $E \subseteq X$ be von Neumann-bounded. Then there exists a von Neumann-bounded set $F \subseteq Y$ such that: :$T_\alpha \sqbrk ...
Let: :$\ds F = \bigcup_{\alpha \mathop \in I} T_\alpha \sqbrk E$ Then $T_\alpha \sqbrk E \subseteq F$ for each $\alpha \in I$. It is enough to show that $F$ is von Neumann-bounded. Let $W$ be an open neighborhood of $\mathbf 0_Y$. Since $\family {T_\alpha}_{\alpha \in I}$ is equicontinuous, there exists an open neighbo...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ and $Y$ be a [[Definition:Topological Vector Space|topological vector space]] over $\GF$. Let $\family {T_\alpha}_{\alpha \in I}$ be an [[Definition:Equicontinuous Family of Linear Transformations between Topological Vector Spaces|equicontinuous family]] of [[Definition:Linear T...
Let: :$\ds F = \bigcup_{\alpha \mathop \in I} T_\alpha \sqbrk E$ Then $T_\alpha \sqbrk E \subseteq F$ for each $\alpha \in I$. It is enough to show that $F$ is [[Definition:von Neumann-Bounded Subset of Topological Vector Space|von Neumann-bounded]]. Let $W$ be an [[Definition:Open Neighborhood|open neighborhood]] ...
Image of von Neumann-Bounded Set under Equicontinuous Family of Linear Transformations is Contained in von Neumann-Bounded Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Image_of_von_Neumann-Bounded_Set_under_Equicontinuous_Family_of_Linear_Transformations_is_Contained_in_von_Neumann-Bounded_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Image_of_von_Neumann-Bounded_Set_under_Equicontinuous_Family_of_Linear_Transformations_is_Contained_in_von_Neumann-Bounded_Set
[ "Equicontinuous Families of Linear Transformations between Topological Vector Spaces", "von Neumann-Bounded Subsets of Topological Vector Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Equicontinuous Family of Linear Transformations between Topological Vector Spaces", "Definition:Linear Transformation", "Definition:von Neumann-Bounded Subset of Topological Vector Space", "Definition:von Neumann-Bounded Subset of Topological Vector Space" ...
[ "Definition:von Neumann-Bounded Subset of Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Open Neighborhood", "Definition:Equicontinuous Family of Linear Transformations between Topological Vector Spaces", "Definition:Open Neighborhood", "Definition:von Neumann-Bounded Subset of Topological Vector Space", "Image o...
proofwiki-20556
Integration by Partial Fractions
Let $\map R x = \dfrac {\map P x} {\map Q x}$ be a rational function over $\R$ such that the degree of the polynomial $P$ is strictly smaller than the degree of the polynomial $Q$. Consider the primitive: :$\ds \int \map R x \rd x$ Let $\map R x$ be expressible by the partial fractions expansion: :$\map R x = \ds \sum_...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int \map R x \rd x | r = \int \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n \dfrac {\map {p_k} x} {\map {q_k} x} } \rd x | c = Definition of $\map R x$: {{hypothesis}} }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n \int \dfrac {\map {p_k} x} {\map {q_k} x} \rd x | c = Linear Combination of Integral...
Let $\map R x = \dfrac {\map P x} {\map Q x}$ be a [[Definition:Real Rational Function|rational function over $\R$]] such that the [[Definition:Degree of Polynomial|degree]] of the [[Definition:Real Polynomial Function|polynomial $P$]] is strictly smaller than the [[Definition:Degree of Polynomial|degree]] of the [[Def...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int \map R x \rd x | r = \int \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n \dfrac {\map {p_k} x} {\map {q_k} x} } \rd x | c = Definition of $\map R x$: {{hypothesis}} }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n \int \dfrac {\map {p_k} x} {\map {q_k} x} \rd x | c = [[Linear Combination of Integr...
Integration by Partial Fractions
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integration_by_Partial_Fractions
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integration_by_Partial_Fractions
[ "Integration by Partial Fractions", "Integral Calculus", "Partial Fractions Expansions", "Named Theorems", "Proof Techniques" ]
[ "Definition:Rational Function/Real", "Definition:Degree of Polynomial", "Definition:Polynomial Function/Real", "Definition:Degree of Polynomial", "Definition:Polynomial Function/Real", "Definition:Primitive (Calculus)", "Definition:Partial Fractions Expansion", "Definition:Polynomial Function", "Def...
[ "Linear Combination of Integrals" ]
proofwiki-20557
Characterization for Topological Evaluation Mapping to be Embedding/Necessary Condition
Let $X$ be a topological space. Let $\family {Y_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an indexed family of topological spaces for some indexing set $I$. Let $\family {f_i : X \to Y_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an indexed family of continuous mappings. Let $\ds Y = \prod_{i \mathop \in I} Y_i$ be the product space of $\family {Y_i}_{i \...
=== $(1)$ The Topology on $X$ is the Initial Topology === Let $f \sqbrk X$ denote the image of $f$. Let $\tau_{f \sqbrk X}$ be the subspace topology on $f \sqbrk X$. By definition of embedding: :$f \restriction_{X \times f \sqbrk X}$ is a homeomorphism between $X$ and $f \sqbrk X$ From Subspace of Product Space has Ini...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $\family {Y_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an [[Definition:Indexed Family|indexed family]] of [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]] for some [[Definition:Indexing Set|indexing set]] $I$. Let $\family {f_i : X \to Y_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be ...
=== $(1)$ The Topology on $X$ is the Initial Topology === Let $f \sqbrk X$ denote the [[Definition:Image of Mapping|image]] of $f$. Let $\tau_{f \sqbrk X}$ be the [[Definition:Subspace Topology|subspace topology]] on $f \sqbrk X$. By definition of [[Definition:Embedding (Topology)|embedding]]: :$f \restriction_{X \t...
Characterization for Topological Evaluation Mapping to be Embedding/Necessary Condition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characterization_for_Topological_Evaluation_Mapping_to_be_Embedding/Necessary_Condition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characterization_for_Topological_Evaluation_Mapping_to_be_Embedding/Necessary_Condition
[ "Characterization for Topological Evaluation Mapping to be Embedding" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Indexing Set/Family", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Indexing Set", "Definition:Indexing Set/Family", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Product Space (Topology)", "Definition:Evaluation Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Em...
[ "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Mapping", "Definition:Topological Subspace", "Definition:Embedding (Topology)", "Definition:Homeomorphism", "Subspace of Product Space has Initial Topology with respect to Restricted Projections", "Definition:Initial Topology", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:T...
proofwiki-20558
Characterization for Topological Evaluation Mapping to be Embedding/Sufficient Condition
Let $X$ be a topological space. Let $\family {Y_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an indexed family of topological spaces for some indexing set $I$. Let $\family {f_i : X \to Y_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an indexed family of continuous mappings. Let $\ds Y = \prod_{i \mathop \in I} Y_i$ be the product space of $\family {Y_i}_{i \...
From Evaluation Mapping is Injective iff Mappings Separate Points: :$f$ is an injection From Injection to Image is Bijection: :$f \restriction_{X \times f \sqbrk X} \mathop : X \to f \sqbrk X$ is a bijection From Topological Evaluation Mapping is Continuous: :$f$ is continuous From Continuity of Composite of Inclusion ...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $\family {Y_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an [[Definition:Indexed Family|indexed family]] of [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]] for some [[Definition:Indexing Set|indexing set]] $I$. Let $\family {f_i : X \to Y_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be ...
From [[Evaluation Mapping is Injective iff Mappings Separate Points]]: :$f$ is an [[Definition:Injection|injection]] From [[Injection to Image is Bijection]]: :$f \restriction_{X \times f \sqbrk X} \mathop : X \to f \sqbrk X$ is a [[Definition:Bijection|bijection]] From [[Topological Evaluation Mapping is Continuous...
Characterization for Topological Evaluation Mapping to be Embedding/Sufficient Condition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characterization_for_Topological_Evaluation_Mapping_to_be_Embedding/Sufficient_Condition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characterization_for_Topological_Evaluation_Mapping_to_be_Embedding/Sufficient_Condition
[ "Characterization for Topological Evaluation Mapping to be Embedding" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Indexing Set/Family", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Indexing Set", "Definition:Indexing Set/Family", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Product Space (Topology)", "Definition:Evaluation Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:To...
[ "Evaluation Mapping is Injective iff Mappings Separate Points", "Definition:Injection", "Injection to Image is Bijection", "Definition:Bijection", "Topological Evaluation Mapping is Continuous", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Continuity of Composite with Inclusion/Inclusion on Mapping", ...
proofwiki-20559
There are 83 Right-Truncatable Primes in Base 10
In base $10$, there are $83$ right-truncatable primes: :$2$, $3$, $5$, $7$, :$23$, $29$, $31$, $37$, $53$, $59$, $71$, $73$, $79$, :$233$, $239$, $293$, $311$, $313$, $317$, $373$, $379$, $593$, $599$, $719$, $733$, $739$, $797$, :$2333$, $2339$, $2393$, $2399$, $2939$, $3119$, $3137$, $3733$, $3739$, $3793$, $3797$, $...
Of the $1$-digit numbers, only $2$, $3$, $5$, $7$ are primes. Of the $2$-digit numbers starting with $2$, only $23$ and $29$ are primes. Of the $2$-digit numbers starting with $3$, only $31$ and $37$ are primes. Of the $2$-digit numbers starting with $5$, only $53$ and $59$ are primes. Of the $2$-digit numbers starting...
In [[Definition:Decimal Notation|base $10$]], there are $83$ [[Definition:Right-Truncatable Prime|right-truncatable primes]]: :$2$, $3$, $5$, $7$, :$23$, $29$, $31$, $37$, $53$, $59$, $71$, $73$, $79$, :$233$, $239$, $293$, $311$, $313$, $317$, $373$, $379$, $593$, $599$, $719$, $733$, $739$, $797$, :$2333$, $2339$, $...
Of the $1$-[[Definition:Digit|digit]] [[Definition:Natural Number|numbers]], only $2$, $3$, $5$, $7$ are [[Definition:Prime Number|primes]]. Of the $2$-[[Definition:Digit|digit]] [[Definition:Natural Number|numbers]] starting with $2$, only $23$ and $29$ are [[Definition:Prime Number|primes]]. Of the $2$-[[Definitio...
There are 83 Right-Truncatable Primes in Base 10
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/There_are_83_Right-Truncatable_Primes_in_Base_10
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/There_are_83_Right-Truncatable_Primes_in_Base_10
[ "Right-Truncatable Primes" ]
[ "Definition:Decimal Notation", "Definition:Right-Truncatable Prime" ]
[ "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:P...
proofwiki-20560
Stone's Representation Theorem for Boolean Algebras
Let $B$ be a Boolean algebra. Let $S$ be the Stone space of $B$. Then: :The set of clopen sets in $S$ is a Boolean algebra under union, intersection, and complementation in $S$. :That Boolean algebra is isomorphic to $B$.
{{Proofread}} {{Explain| Explain how the Ultrafilter Lemma/Boolean prime ideal theorem or Axiom of choice/Zorn's Lemma is explicitly used in the proof.}} First, the statement of the proof has to be shown to be equivalent to the form: Let $B$ be a Boolean algebra. This proof will assume the Ultrafilter Lemma holds. Then...
Let $B$ be a [[Definition:Boolean Algebra|Boolean algebra]]. Let $S$ be the [[Definition:Stone Space|Stone space]] of $B$. Then: :The [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Clopen Set|clopen sets]] in $S$ is a [[Definition:Boolean Algebra|Boolean algebra]] under [[Definition:Set Union|union]], [[Definition:Set Inters...
{{Proofread}} {{Explain| Explain how the Ultrafilter Lemma/Boolean prime ideal theorem or Axiom of choice/Zorn's Lemma is explicitly used in the proof.}} First, the statement of the proof has to be shown to be equivalent to the form: Let $B$ be a [[Definition:Boolean Algebra|Boolean algebra]]. This proof will assume...
Stone's Representation Theorem for Boolean Algebras
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Stone's_Representation_Theorem_for_Boolean_Algebras
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Stone's_Representation_Theorem_for_Boolean_Algebras
[ "Boolean Algebras", "Stone Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Boolean Algebra", "Definition:Stone Space", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Clopen Set", "Definition:Boolean Algebra", "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Set Complement", "Definition:Boolean Algebra", "Definition:Isomorphism (Abstract Algebra)" ]
[ "Definition:Boolean Algebra", "Ultrafilter Lemma" ]
proofwiki-20561
There exist no 4 Consecutive Triangular Numbers which are all Sphenic Numbers
Let $n \in \N$ be a natural number. Let $T_n$, $T_{n + 1}$, $T_{n + 2}$, and $T_{n + 3}$ be the $n$th, $n + 1$th, $n + 2$th and $n + 3$th triangular numbers respectively. Then it is not the case that all of $T_n$, $T_{n + 1}$, $T_{n + 2}$, and $T_{n + 3}$ are sphenic numbers.
Let $\map \Omega n$ denote the number of prime factors of $n$ counted with multiplicity. {{AimForCont}} there exists an $n$ such that $T_n$, $T_{n + 1}$, $T_{n + 2}$, and $T_{n + 3}$ are all sphenic numbers. Thus from Closed Form for Triangular Numbers: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = T_n | r = \dfrac {n \paren {n + 1}...
Let $n \in \N$ be a [[Definition:Natural Number|natural number]]. Let $T_n$, $T_{n + 1}$, $T_{n + 2}$, and $T_{n + 3}$ be the $n$th, $n + 1$th, $n + 2$th and $n + 3$th [[Definition:Triangular Number|triangular numbers]] respectively. Then it is not the case that all of $T_n$, $T_{n + 1}$, $T_{n + 2}$, and $T_{n + 3}$...
Let $\map \Omega n$ denote the number of [[Definition:Prime Factor|prime factors]] of $n$ counted with [[Definition:Multiplicity of Prime Factor|multiplicity]]. {{AimForCont}} there exists an $n$ such that $T_n$, $T_{n + 1}$, $T_{n + 2}$, and $T_{n + 3}$ are all [[Definition:Sphenic Number|sphenic numbers]]. Thus fr...
There exist no 4 Consecutive Triangular Numbers which are all Sphenic Numbers/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/There_exist_no_4_Consecutive_Triangular_Numbers_which_are_all_Sphenic_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/There_exist_no_4_Consecutive_Triangular_Numbers_which_are_all_Sphenic_Numbers/Proof_1
[ "Triangular Numbers", "Sphenic Numbers", "There exist no 4 Consecutive Triangular Numbers which are all Sphenic Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Triangular Number", "Definition:Sphenic Number" ]
[ "Definition:Prime Factor", "Definition:Prime Decomposition/Multiplicity", "Definition:Sphenic Number", "Closed Form for Triangular Numbers", "Definition:Sphenic Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Closed Form for Triangular Numbers", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Divisor (Alge...
proofwiki-20562
There exist no 4 Consecutive Triangular Numbers which are all Sphenic Numbers
Let $n \in \N$ be a natural number. Let $T_n$, $T_{n + 1}$, $T_{n + 2}$, and $T_{n + 3}$ be the $n$th, $n + 1$th, $n + 2$th and $n + 3$th triangular numbers respectively. Then it is not the case that all of $T_n$, $T_{n + 1}$, $T_{n + 2}$, and $T_{n + 3}$ are sphenic numbers.
{{AimForCont}} there exists an $n$ such that $T_n$, $T_{n + 1}$, $T_{n + 2}$, and $T_{n + 3}$ are all sphenic numbers. Observe from Sequence of Smallest 3 Consecutive Triangular Numbers which are Sphenic that there are no such $n$ for $n < 12$. Thus from Closed Form for Triangular Numbers: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = T_n...
Let $n \in \N$ be a [[Definition:Natural Number|natural number]]. Let $T_n$, $T_{n + 1}$, $T_{n + 2}$, and $T_{n + 3}$ be the $n$th, $n + 1$th, $n + 2$th and $n + 3$th [[Definition:Triangular Number|triangular numbers]] respectively. Then it is not the case that all of $T_n$, $T_{n + 1}$, $T_{n + 2}$, and $T_{n + 3}$...
{{AimForCont}} there exists an $n$ such that $T_n$, $T_{n + 1}$, $T_{n + 2}$, and $T_{n + 3}$ are all [[Definition:Sphenic Number|sphenic numbers]]. Observe from [[Sequence of Smallest 3 Consecutive Triangular Numbers which are Sphenic]] that there are no such $n$ for $n < 12$. Thus from [[Closed Form for Triangular ...
There exist no 4 Consecutive Triangular Numbers which are all Sphenic Numbers/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/There_exist_no_4_Consecutive_Triangular_Numbers_which_are_all_Sphenic_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/There_exist_no_4_Consecutive_Triangular_Numbers_which_are_all_Sphenic_Numbers/Proof_2
[ "Triangular Numbers", "Sphenic Numbers", "There exist no 4 Consecutive Triangular Numbers which are all Sphenic Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Triangular Number", "Definition:Sphenic Number" ]
[ "Definition:Sphenic Number", "Sequence of Smallest 3 Consecutive Triangular Numbers which are Sphenic", "Closed Form for Triangular Numbers", "Definition:Sphenic Number", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Sphenic Number", "Definition:Sphenic Nu...
proofwiki-20563
Number of form 4666...6669 is Divisible by 7
Let $x$ be a natural number in the form: :$\sqbrk {4 \underbrace {666 \cdots 6}_n 9}_{10}$ Then $x$ is divisible by $7$.
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sqbrk {4 \underbrace {666 \cdots 6}_n 9}_{10} | r = 4 \times 10^{n + 1} + 6 \times 10^n + \cdots + 6 \times 10^1 + 9 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 4 \times 10^{n + 1} + \dfrac {6 \times \paren {10^n - 1} } {\paren {10 - 1} } \times 10 + 9 | c = Sum of Geometric Sequence }} ...
Let $x$ be a [[Definition:Natural Number|natural number]] in the form: :$\sqbrk {4 \underbrace {666 \cdots 6}_n 9}_{10}$ Then $x$ is [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divisible]] by $7$.
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sqbrk {4 \underbrace {666 \cdots 6}_n 9}_{10} | r = 4 \times 10^{n + 1} + 6 \times 10^n + \cdots + 6 \times 10^1 + 9 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 4 \times 10^{n + 1} + \dfrac {6 \times \paren {10^n - 1} } {\paren {10 - 1} } \times 10 + 9 | c = [[Sum of Geometric Sequence]...
Number of form 4666...6669 is Divisible by 7
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_of_form_4666...6669_is_Divisible_by_7
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_of_form_4666...6669_is_Divisible_by_7
[ "Divisibility by 7" ]
[ "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer" ]
[ "Sum of Geometric Sequence", "Definition:Common Denominator", "Definition:Addition", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Multiple/Integer", "Divisibility by 9/Corollary", "Definition:Integer", "Congruence of Powers", "Congruence of Product", "Congruence of Quotient", "Category:Divisibility by 7" ]
proofwiki-20564
Number of form 28000...0007 is Divisible by 7
Let $x$ be a natural number in the form: :$\sqbrk {28 \underbrace {000 \cdots 0}_n 7}_{10}$ Then $x$ is divisible by $7$.
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sqbrk {28 \underbrace {000 \cdots 0}_n 7}_{10} | r = 2 \times 10^{n + 2} + 8 \times 10^{n + 1} + 0 \times 10^n + \cdots + 0 \times 10^1 + 7 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 28 \times 10^{n + 1} + 7 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 28 \times 10^{n + 1} + 7 ...
Let $x$ be a [[Definition:Natural Number|natural number]] in the form: :$\sqbrk {28 \underbrace {000 \cdots 0}_n 7}_{10}$ Then $x$ is [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divisible]] by $7$.
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sqbrk {28 \underbrace {000 \cdots 0}_n 7}_{10} | r = 2 \times 10^{n + 2} + 8 \times 10^{n + 1} + 0 \times 10^n + \cdots + 0 \times 10^1 + 7 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 28 \times 10^{n + 1} + 7 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 28 \times 10^{n + 1} ...
Number of form 28000...0007 is Divisible by 7/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_of_form_28000...0007_is_Divisible_by_7
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_of_form_28000...0007_is_Divisible_by_7/Proof_1
[ "Number of form 28000...0007 is Divisible by 7", "Divisibility by 7" ]
[ "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer" ]
[ "Fermat's Little Theorem", "Congruence of Powers", "Congruence of Product" ]
proofwiki-20565
Number of form 28000...0007 is Divisible by 7
Let $x$ be a natural number in the form: :$\sqbrk {28 \underbrace {000 \cdots 0}_n 7}_{10}$ Then $x$ is divisible by $7$.
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sqbrk {28 \underbrace {000 \cdots 0}_n 7}_{10} | r = 7 \times \sqbrk {4 \underbrace {000 \cdots 0}_n 1}_{10} | c = }} {{end-eqn}} and the result follows by definition of divisibility. {{qed}}
Let $x$ be a [[Definition:Natural Number|natural number]] in the form: :$\sqbrk {28 \underbrace {000 \cdots 0}_n 7}_{10}$ Then $x$ is [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divisible]] by $7$.
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sqbrk {28 \underbrace {000 \cdots 0}_n 7}_{10} | r = 7 \times \sqbrk {4 \underbrace {000 \cdots 0}_n 1}_{10} | c = }} {{end-eqn}} and the result follows by definition of [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divisibility]]. {{qed}}
Number of form 28000...0007 is Divisible by 7/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_of_form_28000...0007_is_Divisible_by_7
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_of_form_28000...0007_is_Divisible_by_7/Proof_2
[ "Number of form 28000...0007 is Divisible by 7", "Divisibility by 7" ]
[ "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer" ]
[ "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer" ]
proofwiki-20566
Derivative of Hyperbolic Tangent/Corollary
:$\map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\tanh x} = 1 - \tanh^2 x$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\tanh x} | r = \sech^2 x | c = Derivative of Hyperbolic Tangent }} {{eqn | r = 1 - \tanh^2 x | c = Sum of Squares of Hyperbolic Secant and Tangent }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
:$\map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\tanh x} = 1 - \tanh^2 x$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\tanh x} | r = \sech^2 x | c = [[Derivative of Hyperbolic Tangent]] }} {{eqn | r = 1 - \tanh^2 x | c = [[Sum of Squares of Hyperbolic Secant and Tangent]] }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
Derivative of Hyperbolic Tangent/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Hyperbolic_Tangent/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Hyperbolic_Tangent/Corollary
[ "Hyperbolic Tangent Function" ]
[]
[ "Derivative of Hyperbolic Tangent", "Sum of Squares of Hyperbolic Secant and Tangent" ]
proofwiki-20567
Derivative of Hyperbolic Cotangent/Corollary
:$\map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\coth x} = 1 - \coth^2 x$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \dfrac \d {\d x} \coth x | r = -\csch^2 x | c = Derivative of Hyperbolic Cotangent }} {{eqn | r = 1 - \coth^2 x | c = Difference of Squares of Hyperbolic Cotangent and Cosecant }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
:$\map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\coth x} = 1 - \coth^2 x$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \dfrac \d {\d x} \coth x | r = -\csch^2 x | c = [[Derivative of Hyperbolic Cotangent]] }} {{eqn | r = 1 - \coth^2 x | c = [[Difference of Squares of Hyperbolic Cotangent and Cosecant]] }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
Derivative of Hyperbolic Cotangent/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Hyperbolic_Cotangent/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Hyperbolic_Cotangent/Corollary
[ "Derivative of Hyperbolic Cotangent" ]
[]
[ "Derivative of Hyperbolic Cotangent", "Difference of Squares of Hyperbolic Cotangent and Cosecant" ]
proofwiki-20568
Interior of Proper Subspace of Normed Vector Space is Empty
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be a normed vector space over $\GF$. Let $U$ be a proper vector subspace of $X$. Let $U^\circ$ be the interior of $U$. Then $U^\circ = \O$.
{{AimForCont}} $U^\circ \ne \O$. Take $x \in U^\circ$. Then there exists $\epsilon > 0$ such that $\map {B_\epsilon} x \subseteq U$, where $\map {B_\epsilon} x$ is the open ball centered at $x$ with radius $\epsilon$. Since $U$ is a vector subspace, we have: :$\map {B_\epsilon} 0 = \map {B_\epsilon} x - x \subseteq U$ ...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be a [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector space]] over $\GF$. Let $U$ be a [[Definition:Proper Subset|proper]] [[Definition:Vector Subspace|vector subspace]] of $X$. Let $U^\circ$ be the [[Definition:Interior (Topology)|interior]] of $...
{{AimForCont}} $U^\circ \ne \O$. Take $x \in U^\circ$. Then there exists $\epsilon > 0$ such that $\map {B_\epsilon} x \subseteq U$, where $\map {B_\epsilon} x$ is the [[Definition:Open Ball|open ball]] [[Definition:Center of Open Ball|centered]] at $x$ with [[Definition:Radius of Open Ball|radius]] $\epsilon$. Sinc...
Interior of Proper Subspace of Normed Vector Space is Empty
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Interior_of_Proper_Subspace_of_Normed_Vector_Space_is_Empty
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Interior_of_Proper_Subspace_of_Normed_Vector_Space_is_Empty
[ "Normed Vector Spaces", "Set Interiors" ]
[ "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Proper Subset", "Definition:Vector Subspace", "Definition:Interior (Topology)" ]
[ "Definition:Open Ball", "Definition:Open Ball/Center", "Definition:Open Ball/Radius", "Definition:Vector Subspace", "Definition:Vector Subspace", "Definition:Contradiction", "Proof by Contradition", "Category:Normed Vector Spaces", "Category:Set Interiors" ]
proofwiki-20569
Weak Topology on Infinite Dimensional Normed Vector Space is not Metrizable
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be an infinite dimensional normed vector space over $\GF$. Let $w$ be the weak topology on $X$. Then $w$ is not metrizable.
Let $X^\ast$ be the normed dual space of $X$. From Metric Space is First-Countable, it suffices to show that $\struct {X, w}$ is not first-countable. {{AimForCont}} that $\struct {X, w}$ is first-countable. Let $\sequence {U_n}_{n \mathop \in \N}$ be a local basis for $\mathbf 0_X$. From Open Sets in Weak Topology of ...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be an [[Definition:Infinite Dimensional Vector Space|infinite dimensional]] [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector space]] over $\GF$. Let $w$ be the [[Definition:Weak Topology on Topological Vector Space|weak topology]] on $X$. Then $w$ ...
Let $X^\ast$ be the [[Definition:Normed Dual Space|normed dual space]] of $X$. From [[Metric Space is First-Countable]], it suffices to show that $\struct {X, w}$ is not [[Definition:First-Countable Space|first-countable]]. {{AimForCont}} that $\struct {X, w}$ is [[Definition:First-Countable Space|first-countable]]....
Weak Topology on Infinite Dimensional Normed Vector Space is not Metrizable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Weak_Topology_on_Infinite_Dimensional_Normed_Vector_Space_is_not_Metrizable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Weak_Topology_on_Infinite_Dimensional_Normed_Vector_Space_is_not_Metrizable
[ "Weak Topologies on Topological Vector Spaces", "Metrizable Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Infinite Dimensional Vector Space", "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Weak Topology on Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Metrizable Space" ]
[ "Definition:Normed Dual Space", "Metric Space is First-Countable", "Definition:First-Countable Space", "Definition:First-Countable Space", "Definition:Local Basis", "Open Sets in Weak Topology of Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Local Basis", "Condition for Linear Depe...
proofwiki-20570
Open Sets in Weak Topology of Topological Vector Space
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a topological vector space over $\GF$ with weak topology $w$. Let $U \subseteq X$. Then $U$ is open in $\struct {X, w}$ {{iff}} for each $x \in U$ there exists $f_1, f_2, \ldots, f_n \in X^\ast$ and $\epsilon > 0$ such that: :$\set {y \in X : \cmod {\map {f_i} {y - x} } < \ep...
Let $X^\ast$ be the topological dual space of $X$. By the definition of the weak topology, $w$ is the initial topology on $X$ with respect to $X^\ast$. For each $f \in X^\ast$, define $p_f : X \to \hointr 0 \infty$ by: :$\map {p_f} x = \cmod {\map f x}$ for each $x \in X$, and set: :$\PP = \set {p_f : f \in X^\ast}$...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Topological Vector Space|topological vector space]] over $\GF$ with [[Definition:Weak Topology on Topological Vector Space|weak topology]] $w$. Let $U \subseteq X$. Then $U$ is [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open]] in $\struct {X, w}$ {{iff}} for each $x \...
Let $X^\ast$ be the [[Definition:Topological Dual Space|topological dual space]] of $X$. By the definition of the [[Definition:Weak Topology on Topological Vector Space|weak topology]], $w$ is the [[Definition:Initial Topology|initial topology]] on $X$ with respect to $X^\ast$. For each $f \in X^\ast$, define $p_f :...
Open Sets in Weak Topology of Topological Vector Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Open_Sets_in_Weak_Topology_of_Topological_Vector_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Open_Sets_in_Weak_Topology_of_Topological_Vector_Space
[ "Weak Topologies on Topological Vector Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Weak Topology on Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Open Set/Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Dual Space", "Definition:Weak Topology on Topological Vector Space", "Definition:Initial Topology", "Initial Topology on Vector Space Generated by Linear Functionals is Locally Convex", "Definition:Locally Convex Space/Standard Topology", "Definition:Locally Convex Space", "Open ...
proofwiki-20571
41 is Smallest Number whose Period of Reciprocal is 5
$41$ is the first positive integer the decimal expansion of whose reciprocal has a period of $5$: :$\dfrac 1 {41} = 0 \cdotp \dot 0243 \dot 9$
From Reciprocal of $41$: {{:Reciprocal of 41}} Counting the digits, it is seen that this has a period of recurrence of $5$. It remains to be shown that $41$ is the smallest positive integer which has this property. {{ProofWanted}} Category:41 Category:Examples of Reciprocals thl87a0mi1vnburqpl26wstyuqqgoy2
$41$ is the first [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integer]] the [[Definition:Decimal Expansion|decimal expansion]] of whose [[Definition:Reciprocal|reciprocal]] has a [[Definition:Period of Recurrence|period]] of $5$: :$\dfrac 1 {41} = 0 \cdotp \dot 0243 \dot 9$
From [[Reciprocal of 41|Reciprocal of $41$]]: {{:Reciprocal of 41}} Counting the digits, it is seen that this has a [[Definition:Period of Recurrence|period of recurrence]] of $5$. It remains to be shown that $41$ is the smallest [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integer]] which has this property. {{ProofWante...
41 is Smallest Number whose Period of Reciprocal is 5
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/41_is_Smallest_Number_whose_Period_of_Reciprocal_is_5
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/41_is_Smallest_Number_whose_Period_of_Reciprocal_is_5
[ "41", "Examples of Reciprocals" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Decimal Expansion", "Definition:Reciprocal", "Definition:Basis Expansion/Recurrence/Period" ]
[ "Reciprocal of 41", "Definition:Basis Expansion/Recurrence/Period", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Category:41", "Category:Examples of Reciprocals" ]
proofwiki-20572
Evaluation Mapping is Injective iff Mappings Separate Points
Let $X$ be a topological space. Let $\family {Y_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an indexed family of topological spaces for some indexing set $I$. Let $\family {f_i : X \to Y_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an indexed family of continuous mappings. Let $\ds Y = \prod_{i \mathop \in I} Y_i$ be the product space of $\family {Y_i}_{i \...
We have: :$f$ is an injection {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | lll = \iff | ll = \forall x, y \in X : x \ne y : | l = \map f x | o = \ne | r = \map f y | c = {{Defof|Injection}} }} {{eqn | lll = \iff | ll = \forall x, y \in X : x \ne y : | l = \family{ \map {f_i} x }_{i \in I} | o =...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $\family {Y_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an [[Definition:Indexed Family|indexed family]] of [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]] for some [[Definition:Indexing Set|indexing set]] $I$. Let $\family {f_i : X \to Y_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be ...
We have: :$f$ is an injection {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | lll = \iff | ll = \forall x, y \in X : x \ne y : | l = \map f x | o = \ne | r = \map f y | c = {{Defof|Injection}} }} {{eqn | lll = \iff | ll = \forall x, y \in X : x \ne y : | l = \family{ \map {f_i} x }_{i \in I} | o =...
Evaluation Mapping is Injective iff Mappings Separate Points
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Evaluation_Mapping_is_Injective_iff_Mappings_Separate_Points
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Evaluation_Mapping_is_Injective_iff_Mappings_Separate_Points
[ "Evaluation Mappings (Topological Spaces)" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Indexing Set/Family", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Indexing Set", "Definition:Indexing Set/Family", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Product Space (Topology)", "Definition:Evaluation Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:In...
[ "Category:Evaluation Mappings (Topological Spaces)" ]
proofwiki-20573
Injection is Open Mapping iff Image of Sub-Basis Set is Open
Let $\struct {X_1, \tau_1}$ and $\struct {X_2, \tau_2}$ be topological spaces. Let $\SS \subseteq \powerset {X_1}$ be a sub-basis of $\tau_1$. Let $f: X_1 \to X_2$ be an injection. Then: :$f$ is an open mapping {{iff}}: :$\forall U \in \SS: f \sqbrk U \in \tau_2$
=== Necessary Condition === Let $f$ be an open mapping. By definition of open mapping: :$\forall U \in \tau_1 : f \sqbrk U \in \tau_2$ By definition of sub-basis: :$\SS \subseteq \tau_1$ Hence: :$\forall U \in \SS: f \sqbrk U \in \tau_2$ {{qed|lemma}}
Let $\struct {X_1, \tau_1}$ and $\struct {X_2, \tau_2}$ be [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]]. Let $\SS \subseteq \powerset {X_1}$ be a [[Definition:Analytic Sub-Basis|sub-basis]] of $\tau_1$. Let $f: X_1 \to X_2$ be an [[Definition:Injection|injection]]. Then: :$f$ is an [[Definition:Open Mappi...
=== Necessary Condition === Let $f$ be an [[Definition:Open Mapping|open mapping]]. By definition of [[Definition:Open Mapping|open mapping]]: :$\forall U \in \tau_1 : f \sqbrk U \in \tau_2$ By definition of [[Definition:Analytic Sub-Basis|sub-basis]]: :$\SS \subseteq \tau_1$ Hence: :$\forall U \in \SS: f \sqbrk U ...
Injection is Open Mapping iff Image of Sub-Basis Set is Open
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Injection_is_Open_Mapping_iff_Image_of_Sub-Basis_Set_is_Open
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Injection_is_Open_Mapping_iff_Image_of_Sub-Basis_Set_is_Open
[ "Open Mappings" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Sub-Basis/Analytic Sub-Basis", "Definition:Injection", "Definition:Open Mapping" ]
[ "Definition:Open Mapping", "Definition:Open Mapping", "Definition:Sub-Basis/Analytic Sub-Basis", "Definition:Sub-Basis/Analytic Sub-Basis", "Definition:Open Mapping" ]
proofwiki-20574
Reciprocal of 11
:$\dfrac 1 {11} = 0 \cdotp \dot 0 \dot 9$
Performing the calculation using long division: <pre> 0.0909... ------------ 11)1.000000000 99 ---- 100 99 --- ... </pre> {{qed}} Category:11 Category:Examples of Reciprocals n9194mcn5vl7elqfpop63niwmfsm61o
:$\dfrac 1 {11} = 0 \cdotp \dot 0 \dot 9$
Performing the calculation using [[Definition:Long Division|long division]]: <pre> 0.0909... ------------ 11)1.000000000 99 ---- 100 99 --- ... </pre> {{qed}} [[Category:11]] [[Category:Examples of Reciprocals]] n9194mcn5vl7elqfpop63niwmfsm61o
Reciprocal of 11
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reciprocal_of_11
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reciprocal_of_11
[ "11", "Examples of Reciprocals" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Classical Algorithm/Division", "Category:11", "Category:Examples of Reciprocals" ]
proofwiki-20575
Reciprocal of 3
:$\dfrac 1 3 = 0 \cdotp \dot 3$
Performing the calculation using long division: <pre> 0.33... -------- 3)1.00... 9 --- 10 9 -- .. </pre> {{qed}} Category:3 Category:Examples of Reciprocals ronv291wvqp44e48ldhjhsw2jd2zygn
:$\dfrac 1 3 = 0 \cdotp \dot 3$
Performing the calculation using [[Definition:Long Division|long division]]: <pre> 0.33... -------- 3)1.00... 9 --- 10 9 -- .. </pre> {{qed}} [[Category:3]] [[Category:Examples of Reciprocals]] ronv291wvqp44e48ldhjhsw2jd2zygn
Reciprocal of 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reciprocal_of_3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reciprocal_of_3
[ "3", "Examples of Reciprocals" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Classical Algorithm/Division", "Category:3", "Category:Examples of Reciprocals" ]
proofwiki-20576
Period of Reciprocal of 43 is Odd
The decimal expansion of the reciprocal of $43$ has an odd period, that is, $21$: :$\dfrac 1 {43} = 0 \cdotp \dot 02325 \, 58139 \, 53488 \, 37209 \, \dot 3$
From Reciprocal of $43$: {{:Reciprocal of 43}} Counting the digits, it is seen that this has a period of recurrence of $21$. Hence the result. {{qed}} Category:43 Category:Examples of Reciprocals snxig1txup7n228s8gghkmlpcy7pg1l
The [[Definition:Decimal Expansion|decimal expansion]] of the [[Definition:Reciprocal|reciprocal]] of $43$ has an [[Definition:Odd Integer|odd]] [[Definition:Period of Recurrence|period]], that is, $21$: :$\dfrac 1 {43} = 0 \cdotp \dot 02325 \, 58139 \, 53488 \, 37209 \, \dot 3$
From [[Reciprocal of 43|Reciprocal of $43$]]: {{:Reciprocal of 43}} Counting the digits, it is seen that this has a [[Definition:Period of Recurrence|period of recurrence]] of $21$. Hence the result. {{qed}} [[Category:43]] [[Category:Examples of Reciprocals]] snxig1txup7n228s8gghkmlpcy7pg1l
Period of Reciprocal of 43 is Odd
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Period_of_Reciprocal_of_43_is_Odd
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Period_of_Reciprocal_of_43_is_Odd
[ "43", "Examples of Reciprocals" ]
[ "Definition:Decimal Expansion", "Definition:Reciprocal", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Basis Expansion/Recurrence/Period" ]
[ "Reciprocal of 43", "Definition:Basis Expansion/Recurrence/Period", "Category:43", "Category:Examples of Reciprocals" ]
proofwiki-20577
Long Period Prime/Examples/29
The prime number $29$ is a long period prime: :$\dfrac 1 {29} = 0 \cdotp \dot 03448 \, 27586 \, 20689 \, 65517 \, 24137 \, 93 \dot 1$
From Reciprocal of $29$: {{:Reciprocal of 29}} Counting the digits, it is seen that this has a period of recurrence of $28$. Hence the result. {{qed}} Category:29 Category:Examples of Long Period Primes cktz7jtmqcqpqhxb3a1g80a6fup7hpb
The [[Definition:Prime Number|prime number]] $29$ is a [[Definition:Long Period Prime|long period prime]]: :$\dfrac 1 {29} = 0 \cdotp \dot 03448 \, 27586 \, 20689 \, 65517 \, 24137 \, 93 \dot 1$
From [[Reciprocal of 29|Reciprocal of $29$]]: {{:Reciprocal of 29}} Counting the digits, it is seen that this has a [[Definition:Period of Recurrence|period of recurrence]] of $28$. Hence the result. {{qed}} [[Category:29]] [[Category:Examples of Long Period Primes]] cktz7jtmqcqpqhxb3a1g80a6fup7hpb
Long Period Prime/Examples/29
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Long_Period_Prime/Examples/29
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Long_Period_Prime/Examples/29
[ "29", "Examples of Long Period Primes" ]
[ "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Long Period Prime" ]
[ "Reciprocal of 29", "Definition:Basis Expansion/Recurrence/Period", "Category:29", "Category:Examples of Long Period Primes" ]
proofwiki-20578
Period of Reciprocal of 79 is One Sixth of Maximal
The decimal expansion of the reciprocal of $79$ has $\dfrac 1 6$ the maximum period, that is: $13$: :$\dfrac 1 {79} = 0 \cdotp \dot 01265 \, 82278 \, 48 \dot 1$
From Reciprocal of $79$: {{:Reciprocal of 79}} Counting the digits, it is seen that this has a period of recurrence of $13$. From Maximum Period of Reciprocal of Prime, the maximum period of recurrence of $\dfrac 1 p$ is $p - 1$. We have that: :$13 = \dfrac {79 - 1} 6$ {{qed}} Category:79 Category:Examples of Reciproca...
The [[Definition:Decimal Expansion|decimal expansion]] of the [[Definition:Reciprocal|reciprocal]] of $79$ has $\dfrac 1 6$ the maximum [[Definition:Period of Recurrence|period]], that is: $13$: :$\dfrac 1 {79} = 0 \cdotp \dot 01265 \, 82278 \, 48 \dot 1$
From [[Reciprocal of 79|Reciprocal of $79$]]: {{:Reciprocal of 79}} Counting the digits, it is seen that this has a [[Definition:Period of Recurrence|period of recurrence]] of $13$. From [[Maximum Period of Reciprocal of Prime]], the maximum [[Definition:Period of Recurrence|period of recurrence]] of $\dfrac 1 p$ is ...
Period of Reciprocal of 79 is One Sixth of Maximal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Period_of_Reciprocal_of_79_is_One_Sixth_of_Maximal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Period_of_Reciprocal_of_79_is_One_Sixth_of_Maximal
[ "79", "Examples of Reciprocals" ]
[ "Definition:Decimal Expansion", "Definition:Reciprocal", "Definition:Basis Expansion/Recurrence/Period" ]
[ "Reciprocal of 79", "Definition:Basis Expansion/Recurrence/Period", "Maximum Period of Reciprocal of Prime", "Definition:Basis Expansion/Recurrence/Period", "Category:79", "Category:Examples of Reciprocals" ]
proofwiki-20579
101 is Smallest Number whose Period of Reciprocal is 4
$101$ is the first positive integer the decimal expansion of whose reciprocal has a period of $4$: :$\dfrac 1 {101} = 0 \cdotp \dot 009 \dot 9$
{{tidy}} Let the positive integer reciprocal be $\dfrac1 k$ for some $k \in \Z_{\ge 0}$. For it to have a period of recurrence of $4$ in base $10$, it must be able to be expressed as $\dfrac a {10^4-1}$ for some $a \in \Z_{\ge 0}$. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 10^4-1 | r = \paren { 10^2 - 1 } \paren { 10^2 + 1 } ...
$101$ is the first [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integer]] the [[Definition:Decimal Expansion|decimal expansion]] of whose [[Definition:Reciprocal|reciprocal]] has a [[Definition:Period of Recurrence|period]] of $4$: :$\dfrac 1 {101} = 0 \cdotp \dot 009 \dot 9$
{{tidy}} Let the positive integer reciprocal be $\dfrac1 k$ for some $k \in \Z_{\ge 0}$. For it to have a period of recurrence of $4$ in base $10$, it must be able to be expressed as $\dfrac a {10^4-1}$ for some $a \in \Z_{\ge 0}$. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 10^4-1 | r = \paren { 10^2 - 1 } \paren { 10^2 + 1 } ...
101 is Smallest Number whose Period of Reciprocal is 4
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/101_is_Smallest_Number_whose_Period_of_Reciprocal_is_4
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/101_is_Smallest_Number_whose_Period_of_Reciprocal_is_4
[ "101", "Examples of Reciprocals" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Decimal Expansion", "Definition:Reciprocal", "Definition:Basis Expansion/Recurrence/Period" ]
[ "Difference of Two Squares", "Category:101", "Category:Examples of Reciprocals" ]
proofwiki-20580
Reciprocal of 83 has Prime Period
The decimal expansion of the reciprocal of $83$ has a prime period, that is $41$: :$\dfrac 1 {83} = 0 \cdotp \dot 01204 \, 81927 \, 71084 \, 33734 \, 93975 \, 90361 \, 44578 \, 31325 \, \dot 3$
From Reciprocal of $83$: :$\dfrac 1 {83} = 0 \cdotp \dot 01204 \, 81927 \, 71084 \, 33734 \, 93975 \, 90361 \, 44578 \, 31325 \, \dot 3$ Counting the digits, it is seen that this has a period of recurrence of $41$. Indeed, $41$ is the $13$th prime number. {{qed}} Category:83 Category:Examples of Reciprocals iqso3aznit6...
The [[Definition:Decimal Expansion|decimal expansion]] of the [[Definition:Reciprocal|reciprocal]] of $83$ has a [[Definition:Prime Number|prime]] [[Definition:Period of Recurrence|period]], that is $41$: :$\dfrac 1 {83} = 0 \cdotp \dot 01204 \, 81927 \, 71084 \, 33734 \, 93975 \, 90361 \, 44578 \, 31325 \, \dot 3$
From [[Reciprocal of 83|Reciprocal of $83$]]: :$\dfrac 1 {83} = 0 \cdotp \dot 01204 \, 81927 \, 71084 \, 33734 \, 93975 \, 90361 \, 44578 \, 31325 \, \dot 3$ Counting the digits, it is seen that this has a [[Definition:Period of Recurrence|period of recurrence]] of $41$. Indeed, $41$ is the $13$th [[Definition:Prime ...
Reciprocal of 83 has Prime Period
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reciprocal_of_83_has_Prime_Period
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reciprocal_of_83_has_Prime_Period
[ "83", "Examples of Reciprocals" ]
[ "Definition:Decimal Expansion", "Definition:Reciprocal", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Basis Expansion/Recurrence/Period" ]
[ "Reciprocal of 83", "Definition:Basis Expansion/Recurrence/Period", "Definition:Prime Number", "Category:83", "Category:Examples of Reciprocals" ]
proofwiki-20581
Repunit 19 is Unique Period Prime with Period 19
The repunit prime $R_{19}$ is a unique period prime whose reciprocal has a period of $19$: :$\dfrac 1 {1 \, 111 \, 111 \, 111 \, 111 \, 111 \, 111} = 0 \cdotp \dot 00000 \, 00000 \, 00000 \, 000 \dot 9$
The reciprocal of a repunit $R_n$ is of the form: :$\dfrac 1 {R_n} = 0 \cdotp \underbrace{\dot 000 \ldots 000}_{n - 1} \dot 9$ {{TheoremWanted|Prove the above}} Thus $\dfrac 1 {R_{19} }$ has a period of $19$. From Period of Reciprocal of Prime, for prime numbers such that: :$p \nmid 10$ we have that the period of such ...
The [[Definition:Repunit Prime|repunit prime]] $R_{19}$ is a [[Definition:Unique Period Prime|unique period prime]] whose [[Definition:Reciprocal|reciprocal]] has a [[Definition:Period of Recurrence|period]] of $19$: :$\dfrac 1 {1 \, 111 \, 111 \, 111 \, 111 \, 111 \, 111} = 0 \cdotp \dot 00000 \, 00000 \, 00000 \, 00...
The [[Definition:Reciprocal|reciprocal]] of a [[Definition:Repunit|repunit]] $R_n$ is of the form: :$\dfrac 1 {R_n} = 0 \cdotp \underbrace{\dot 000 \ldots 000}_{n - 1} \dot 9$ {{TheoremWanted|Prove the above}} Thus $\dfrac 1 {R_{19} }$ has a [[Definition:Period of Recurrence|period]] of $19$. From [[Period of Recip...
Repunit 19 is Unique Period Prime with Period 19
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Repunit_19_is_Unique_Period_Prime_with_Period_19
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Repunit_19_is_Unique_Period_Prime_with_Period_19
[ "1,111,111,111,111,111,111", "Examples of Reciprocals", "Examples of Unique Period Primes" ]
[ "Definition:Repunit Prime", "Definition:Unique Period Prime", "Definition:Reciprocal", "Definition:Basis Expansion/Recurrence/Period" ]
[ "Definition:Reciprocal", "Definition:Repunit", "Definition:Basis Expansion/Recurrence/Period", "Period of Reciprocal of Prime", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Basis Expansion/Recurrence/Period", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Multiplicative Order of Integer", "Definition:Integer", ...
proofwiki-20582
73 is Smallest Number whose Period of Reciprocal is 8
$73$ is the first positive integer the decimal expansion of whose reciprocal has a period of $8$: :$\dfrac 1 {73} = 0 \cdotp \dot 01369 \, 86 \dot 3$
From Reciprocal of $73$: {{:Reciprocal of 73}} Counting the digits, it is seen that this has a period of recurrence of $8$. It remains to be shown that $73$ is the smallest positive integer which has this property. {{ProofWanted}} Category:73 Category:Examples of Reciprocals grxidb2h35auwbwuvxfidb9pl7w2q0v
$73$ is the first [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integer]] the [[Definition:Decimal Expansion|decimal expansion]] of whose [[Definition:Reciprocal|reciprocal]] has a [[Definition:Period of Recurrence|period]] of $8$: :$\dfrac 1 {73} = 0 \cdotp \dot 01369 \, 86 \dot 3$
From [[Reciprocal of 73|Reciprocal of $73$]]: {{:Reciprocal of 73}} Counting the digits, it is seen that this has a [[Definition:Period of Recurrence|period of recurrence]] of $8$. It remains to be shown that $73$ is the smallest [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integer]] which has this property. {{ProofWanted}...
73 is Smallest Number whose Period of Reciprocal is 8
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/73_is_Smallest_Number_whose_Period_of_Reciprocal_is_8
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/73_is_Smallest_Number_whose_Period_of_Reciprocal_is_8
[ "73", "Examples of Reciprocals" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Decimal Expansion", "Definition:Reciprocal", "Definition:Basis Expansion/Recurrence/Period" ]
[ "Reciprocal of 73", "Definition:Basis Expansion/Recurrence/Period", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Category:73", "Category:Examples of Reciprocals" ]
proofwiki-20583
Reciprocal of 9801
:$\dfrac 1 {9801} = 0 \cdotp \dot 00010 \, 20304 \, 05060 \, 70809 \, 10111 \, 21314 \, ... \, 94959 \, 6979 \dot 9$
{{ProofWanted}} Category:9801 Category:Examples of Reciprocals bpiqtpid8jh6p42qhqmr66jfo2afpjn
:$\dfrac 1 {9801} = 0 \cdotp \dot 00010 \, 20304 \, 05060 \, 70809 \, 10111 \, 21314 \, ... \, 94959 \, 6979 \dot 9$
{{ProofWanted}} [[Category:9801]] [[Category:Examples of Reciprocals]] bpiqtpid8jh6p42qhqmr66jfo2afpjn
Reciprocal of 9801
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reciprocal_of_9801
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reciprocal_of_9801
[ "9801", "Examples of Reciprocals" ]
[]
[ "Category:9801", "Category:Examples of Reciprocals" ]
proofwiki-20584
Reciprocal of 909,091
:$\dfrac 1 {909 \, 091} = 0 \cdotp \dot 00000 \, 10999 \, 998 \dot 9$
Performing the calculation using long division: <pre> 0.00000109999989000001... -------------------------------------------- 909091)1.00000000000000000000... 909091 ------ 9090900 8181819 ------- 9090810 8181819 ------- ...
:$\dfrac 1 {909 \, 091} = 0 \cdotp \dot 00000 \, 10999 \, 998 \dot 9$
Performing the calculation using [[Definition:Long Division|long division]]: <pre> 0.00000109999989000001... -------------------------------------------- 909091)1.00000000000000000000... 909091 ------ 9090900 8181819 ------- 9090810 818...
Reciprocal of 909,091
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reciprocal_of_909,091
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reciprocal_of_909,091
[ "909,091", "Examples of Reciprocals" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Classical Algorithm/Division", "Category:909,091", "Category:Examples of Reciprocals" ]
proofwiki-20585
Long Period Prime/Examples/47
The prime number $47$ is a long period prime: :$\dfrac 1 {47} = 0 \cdotp \dot 02127 \, 65957 \, 44680 \, 85106 \, 38297 \, 87234 \, 04255 \, 31914 \, 89361 \, \dot 7$
From Reciprocal of $47$: {{:Reciprocal of 47}} Counting the digits, it is seen that this has a period of recurrence of $46$. Hence the result. {{qed}} Category:47 Category:Examples of Long Period Primes jwxg7b83jx80qin8yzabynjlv90shp1
The [[Definition:Prime Number|prime number]] $47$ is a [[Definition:Long Period Prime|long period prime]]: :$\dfrac 1 {47} = 0 \cdotp \dot 02127 \, 65957 \, 44680 \, 85106 \, 38297 \, 87234 \, 04255 \, 31914 \, 89361 \, \dot 7$
From [[Reciprocal of 47|Reciprocal of $47$]]: {{:Reciprocal of 47}} Counting the digits, it is seen that this has a [[Definition:Period of Recurrence|period of recurrence]] of $46$. Hence the result. {{qed}} [[Category:47]] [[Category:Examples of Long Period Primes]] jwxg7b83jx80qin8yzabynjlv90shp1
Long Period Prime/Examples/47
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Long_Period_Prime/Examples/47
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Long_Period_Prime/Examples/47
[ "47", "Examples of Long Period Primes" ]
[ "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Long Period Prime" ]
[ "Reciprocal of 47", "Definition:Basis Expansion/Recurrence/Period", "Category:47", "Category:Examples of Long Period Primes" ]
proofwiki-20586
Composite of Evaluation Mapping and Projection
Let $X$ be a topological space. Let $\family {Y_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an indexed family of topological spaces for some indexing set $I$. Let $\family {f_i : X \to Y_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an indexed family of continuous mappings. Let $\ds Y = \prod_{i \mathop \in I} Y_i$ be the product space of $\family {Y_i}_{i \...
By definition of projection: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \forall x \in X, i \in I | l = \map {\paren{pr_i \circ f} } x | r = \map {pr_i} {\map f x} | c = {{Defof|Composite Mapping}} }} {{eqn | r = \map {pr_i} {\family{\map {f_i} x} } | c = {{Defof|Evaluation Mapping}} }} {{eqn | r = \map {f_i} x ...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $\family {Y_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an [[Definition:Indexed Family|indexed family]] of [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]] for some [[Definition:Indexing Set|indexing set]] $I$. Let $\family {f_i : X \to Y_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be ...
By definition of [[Definition:Projection (Mapping Theory)|projection]]: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \forall x \in X, i \in I | l = \map {\paren{pr_i \circ f} } x | r = \map {pr_i} {\map f x} | c = {{Defof|Composite Mapping}} }} {{eqn | r = \map {pr_i} {\family{\map {f_i} x} } | c = {{Defof|Evaluat...
Composite of Evaluation Mapping and Projection
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Composite_of_Evaluation_Mapping_and_Projection
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Composite_of_Evaluation_Mapping_and_Projection
[ "Evaluation Mappings (Topological Spaces)" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Indexing Set/Family", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Indexing Set", "Definition:Indexing Set/Family", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Product Space (Topology)", "Definition:Evaluation Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Pr...
[ "Definition:Projection (Mapping Theory)", "Equality of Mappings", "Category:Evaluation Mappings (Topological Spaces)" ]
proofwiki-20587
Space of Bounded Linear Transformations forms Vector Space
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_X}$ and $\struct {Y, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_Y}$ be normed vector spaces over $\GF$. Let $\map B {X, Y}$ be the space of bounded linear transformations from $X$ to $Y$. Let $+_B$ and $\circ_B$ be pointwise addition and pointwise scalar multiplication on $Y...
Let $\map L {X, Y}$ be the space of linear transformations between $X$ and $Y$. From Linear Mappings between Vector Spaces form Vector Space, $\map L {X, Y}$ is a vector space over $\GF$ with pointwise addition and pointwise scalar multiplication. It therefore suffices to show that $\map B {X, Y}$ is a vector subspace ...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_X}$ and $\struct {Y, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_Y}$ be [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector spaces]] over $\GF$. Let $\map B {X, Y}$ be the [[Definition:Space of Bounded Linear Transformations|space of bounded linear transformations]] from $X$ to ...
Let $\map L {X, Y}$ be the [[Definition:Set of All Linear Transformations/Vector Space|space of linear transformations between $X$ and $Y$]]. From [[Linear Mappings between Vector Spaces form Vector Space]], $\map L {X, Y}$ is a [[Definition:Vector Space|vector space]] over $\GF$ with [[Definition:Pointwise Addition o...
Space of Bounded Linear Transformations forms Vector Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Space_of_Bounded_Linear_Transformations_forms_Vector_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Space_of_Bounded_Linear_Transformations_forms_Vector_Space
[ "Space of Bounded Linear Transformations" ]
[ "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Space of Bounded Linear Transformations", "Definition:Pointwise Addition of Mappings", "Definition:Pointwise Scalar Multiplication of Mappings", "Definition:Vector Space" ]
[ "Definition:Set of All Linear Transformations/Vector Space", "Linear Mappings between Vector Spaces form Vector Space", "Definition:Vector Space", "Definition:Pointwise Addition of Mappings", "Definition:Pointwise Scalar Multiplication of Mappings", "Definition:Vector Subspace", "One-Step Vector Subspac...
proofwiki-20588
Norm on Space of Bounded Linear Transformations is Norm
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_X}$ and $\struct {Y, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_Y}$ be normed vector spaces over $\GF$. Let $\map B {X, Y}$ be the space of bounded linear transformations between $X$ and $Y$. Let $\norm {\, \cdot \,}_{\map B {X, Y} }$ be the norm on the space of bounded lin...
From Norm on Bounded Linear Transformation is Finite, $\norm {\, \cdot \,}_{\map B {X, Y} }$ is real-valued.
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_X}$ and $\struct {Y, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_Y}$ be [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector spaces]] over $\GF$. Let $\map B {X, Y}$ be the [[Definition:Space of Bounded Linear Transformations|space of bounded linear transformations between $X$ an...
From [[Norm on Bounded Linear Transformation is Finite]], $\norm {\, \cdot \,}_{\map B {X, Y} }$ is [[Definition:Real Number|real-valued]].
Norm on Space of Bounded Linear Transformations is Norm
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Norm_on_Space_of_Bounded_Linear_Transformations_is_Norm
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Norm_on_Space_of_Bounded_Linear_Transformations_is_Norm
[ "Space of Bounded Linear Transformations", "Normed Vector Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Space of Bounded Linear Transformations", "Definition:Norm/Bounded Linear Transformation", "Definition:Norm/Vector Space" ]
[ "Norm on Bounded Linear Transformation is Finite", "Definition:Real Number" ]
proofwiki-20589
Reciprocal of 47
:$\dfrac 1 {47} = 0 \cdotp \dot 02127 \, 65957 \, 44680 \, 85106 \, 38297 \, 87234 \, 04255 \, 31914 \, 89361 \, \dot 7$
Performing the calculation using long division: <pre> 0.021276595744680851063829787234042553191489361702... ------------------------------------------------------ 47)1.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000... 94 ---- 60 270 400 140 160 150 440 47 235 ...
:$\dfrac 1 {47} = 0 \cdotp \dot 02127 \, 65957 \, 44680 \, 85106 \, 38297 \, 87234 \, 04255 \, 31914 \, 89361 \, \dot 7$
Performing the calculation using [[Definition:Long Division|long division]]: <pre> 0.021276595744680851063829787234042553191489361702... ------------------------------------------------------ 47)1.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000... 94 ---- 60 270 400 140 16...
Reciprocal of 47
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reciprocal_of_47
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reciprocal_of_47
[ "47", "Examples of Reciprocals" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Classical Algorithm/Division", "Category:47", "Category:Examples of Reciprocals" ]
proofwiki-20590
Normed Dual Space is Banach Space
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_X}$ be a normed vector space over $\GF$. Let $\struct {X^\ast, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_{X^\ast} }$ be the normed dual of $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_X}$. Then $\struct {X^\ast, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_{X^\ast} }$ is a Banach space.
By definition, we have: :$X^\ast = \map B {X, \GF}$ and: :$\norm {\, \cdot \,}_{X^\ast} = \norm {\, \cdot \,}_{\map B {X, \GF} }$ From Real Number Line is Banach Space and Complex Plane is Banach Space, $\GF$ is a Banach space. So from Space of Bounded Linear Transformations is Banach Space, $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdo...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_X}$ be a [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector space]] over $\GF$. Let $\struct {X^\ast, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_{X^\ast} }$ be the [[Definition:Normed Dual Space|normed dual]] of $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_X}$. Then $\struct {X^\ast, \n...
By definition, we have: :$X^\ast = \map B {X, \GF}$ and: :$\norm {\, \cdot \,}_{X^\ast} = \norm {\, \cdot \,}_{\map B {X, \GF} }$ From [[Real Number Line is Banach Space]] and [[Complex Plane is Banach Space]], $\GF$ is a [[Definition:Banach Space|Banach space]]. So from [[Space of Bounded Linear Transformations is B...
Normed Dual Space is Banach Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Normed_Dual_Space_is_Banach_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Normed_Dual_Space_is_Banach_Space
[ "Normed Dual Spaces", "Banach Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Normed Dual Space", "Definition:Banach Space" ]
[ "Real Number Line is Banach Space", "Complex Plane is Banach Space", "Definition:Banach Space", "Space of Bounded Linear Transformations is Banach Space", "Definition:Banach Space", "Category:Normed Dual Spaces", "Category:Banach Spaces" ]
proofwiki-20591
Bound on Norm of Power of Element in Normed Algebra
Let $\Bbb F \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {A, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be a normed algebra over $\GF$. Let $x \in A$ and $n \in \N$. Then: :$\norm {x^n} \le \norm x^n$
The proof proceeds by induction. For all $n \in \Z_{>0}$, let $\map P n$ be the proposition: :$\norm {x^n} \le \norm x^n$
Let $\Bbb F \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {A, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be a [[Definition:Normed Algebra|normed algebra]] over $\GF$. Let $x \in A$ and $n \in \N$. Then: :$\norm {x^n} \le \norm x^n$
The proof proceeds by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]]. For all $n \in \Z_{>0}$, let $\map P n$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :$\norm {x^n} \le \norm x^n$
Bound on Norm of Power of Element in Normed Algebra
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Bound_on_Norm_of_Power_of_Element_in_Normed_Algebra
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Bound_on_Norm_of_Power_of_Element_in_Normed_Algebra
[ "Normed Algebras" ]
[ "Definition:Normed Algebra" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Proposition" ]
proofwiki-20592
Product Rule for Sequence in Normed Algebra
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {A, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be a normed algebra over $\GF$. Let $\sequence {a_n}_{n \in \N}$ and $\sequence {b_n}_{n \in \N}$ be sequences in $A$ converging to $a$ and $b$ respectively. Then: :$a_n b_n \to a b$
From Convergent Sequence in Normed Vector Space is Bounded, there exists $M > 0$ such that: :$\norm {a_n} \le M$ for each $n \in \N$. We have for $n \in \N$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \norm {a_n b_n - a b} | r = \norm {a_n b_n - a_n b + a_n b - a b} }} {{eqn | r = \norm {a_n \paren {b_n - b} + b \paren {a_n - a} } ...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {A, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be a [[Definition:Normed Algebra|normed algebra]] over $\GF$. Let $\sequence {a_n}_{n \in \N}$ and $\sequence {b_n}_{n \in \N}$ be [[Definition:Sequence|sequences]] in $A$ [[Definition:Convergent Sequence in Normed Vector Space|converging]] to $a$...
From [[Convergent Sequence in Normed Vector Space is Bounded]], there exists $M > 0$ such that: :$\norm {a_n} \le M$ for each $n \in \N$. We have for $n \in \N$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \norm {a_n b_n - a b} | r = \norm {a_n b_n - a_n b + a_n b - a b} }} {{eqn | r = \norm {a_n \paren {b_n - b} + b \paren {a_n ...
Product Rule for Sequence in Normed Algebra
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_Rule_for_Sequence_in_Normed_Algebra
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_Rule_for_Sequence_in_Normed_Algebra
[ "Normed Algebras", "Convergent Sequences (Normed Vector Spaces)" ]
[ "Definition:Normed Algebra", "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Convergent Sequence/Normed Vector Space" ]
[ "Convergent Sequence in Normed Vector Space is Bounded", "Sequence in Normed Vector Space Convergent to Limit iff Norm of Sequence minus Limit is Null Sequence", "Category:Normed Algebras", "Category:Convergent Sequences (Normed Vector Spaces)" ]
proofwiki-20593
Convergent Sequence in Normed Vector Space is Bounded
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be a normed vector space. Let $\sequence {x_n}_{n \in \N}$ be a convergent sequence. Then there exists $M > 0$ such that: :$\norm {x_n} \le M$ for each $n \in \N$.
Suppose that $x_n \to x$. From Convergent Sequence is Cauchy Sequence, $\sequence {x_n}_{n \in \N}$ is a Cauchy sequence. So there exists $N \in \N$ such that: :$\norm {x_n - x_m} < 1$ for each $n, m \ge N$. That is: :$\norm {x_n - x_N} < 1$ for $n \ge N$. From Reverse Triangle Inequality: Normed Vector Space, we ...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be a [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector space]]. Let $\sequence {x_n}_{n \in \N}$ be a [[Definition:Convergent Sequence in Normed Vector Space|convergent sequence]]. Then there exists $M > 0$ such that: :$\norm {x_n} \le M$ for e...
Suppose that $x_n \to x$. From [[Convergent Sequence is Cauchy Sequence]], $\sequence {x_n}_{n \in \N}$ is a [[Definition:Cauchy Sequence|Cauchy sequence]]. So there exists $N \in \N$ such that: :$\norm {x_n - x_m} < 1$ for each $n, m \ge N$. That is: :$\norm {x_n - x_N} < 1$ for $n \ge N$. From [[Reverse ...
Convergent Sequence in Normed Vector Space is Bounded
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Convergent_Sequence_in_Normed_Vector_Space_is_Bounded
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Convergent_Sequence_in_Normed_Vector_Space_is_Bounded
[ "Convergent Sequences (Normed Vector Spaces)" ]
[ "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Convergent Sequence/Normed Vector Space" ]
[ "Convergent Sequence is Cauchy Sequence", "Definition:Cauchy Sequence", "Reverse Triangle Inequality/Normed Vector Space", "Category:Convergent Sequences (Normed Vector Spaces)" ]
proofwiki-20594
Sum Rule for Sequence in Normed Vector Space
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be a normed vector space over $\GF$. Let $\sequence {x_n}_{n \in \N}$ and $\sequence {y_n}_{n \in \N}$ be convergent sequences such that: :$x_n \to x$ and: :$y_n \to y$ Then: :$x_n + y_n \to x + y$
For each $n \in \N$, we have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \norm {\paren {x_n + y_n} - \paren {x + y} } | r = \norm {\paren {x_n - x} + \paren {y_n - y} } }} {{eqn | o = \le | r = \norm {x_n - x} + \norm {y_n - y} | c = {{NormAxiomVector|3}} }} {{eqn | o = \to | r = 0 }} {{end-eqn}} So from Sequence in Normed Vec...
Let $\GF \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\struct {X, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be a [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector space]] over $\GF$. Let $\sequence {x_n}_{n \in \N}$ and $\sequence {y_n}_{n \in \N}$ be [[Definition:Convergent Sequence in Normed Vector Space|convergent sequences]] such that: :$x_n \to x$ ...
For each $n \in \N$, we have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \norm {\paren {x_n + y_n} - \paren {x + y} } | r = \norm {\paren {x_n - x} + \paren {y_n - y} } }} {{eqn | o = \le | r = \norm {x_n - x} + \norm {y_n - y} | c = {{NormAxiomVector|3}} }} {{eqn | o = \to | r = 0 }} {{end-eqn}} So from [[Sequence in Normed...
Sum Rule for Sequence in Normed Vector Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_Rule_for_Sequence_in_Normed_Vector_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_Rule_for_Sequence_in_Normed_Vector_Space
[ "Convergent Sequences (Normed Vector Spaces)" ]
[ "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Convergent Sequence/Normed Vector Space" ]
[ "Sequence in Normed Vector Space Convergent to Limit iff Norm of Sequence minus Limit is Null Sequence", "Category:Convergent Sequences (Normed Vector Spaces)" ]
proofwiki-20595
Reciprocal of 13
:$\dfrac 1 {13} = 0 \cdotp \dot 07692 \dot 3 \ldots$
Performing the calculation using long division: <pre> 0.07692307... ------------- 13)1.00000000... 91 ---- 90 78 -- 120 117 --- 30 26 -- 40 39 -- 100 91 --- ... </...
:$\dfrac 1 {13} = 0 \cdotp \dot 07692 \dot 3 \ldots$
Performing the calculation using [[Definition:Long Division|long division]]: <pre> 0.07692307... ------------- 13)1.00000000... 91 ---- 90 78 -- 120 117 --- 30 26 -- 40 39 -- 100 91 ...
Reciprocal of 13
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reciprocal_of_13
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reciprocal_of_13
[ "13", "Examples of Reciprocals" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Classical Algorithm/Division", "Category:13", "Category:Examples of Reciprocals" ]
proofwiki-20596
Reciprocal of 17
:$\dfrac 1 {17} = 0 \cdotp \dot 05882 \, 35294 \, 11764 \, \dot 7$
Performing the calculation using long division: <pre> 0.058823529411764705... ------------------------ 17)1.000000000000000000000 85 68 -- -- 150 20 136 17 --- -- 140 30 136 17 --- -- 40 130 34 11...
:$\dfrac 1 {17} = 0 \cdotp \dot 05882 \, 35294 \, 11764 \, \dot 7$
Performing the calculation using [[Definition:Long Division|long division]]: <pre> 0.058823529411764705... ------------------------ 17)1.000000000000000000000 85 68 -- -- 150 20 136 17 --- -- 140 30 136 17 --- -- ...
Reciprocal of 17
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reciprocal_of_17
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reciprocal_of_17
[ "17", "Examples of Reciprocals" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Classical Algorithm/Division", "Category:17", "Category:Examples of Reciprocals" ]
proofwiki-20597
Reciprocal of 27
:$\dfrac 1 {27} = 0 \cdotp \dot 03 \dot 7$
Performing the calculation using long division: <pre> 0.037... -------- 27)1.00000 81 -- 190 189 --- 100 81 --- ... </pre> It is to be noted that this is because $999 = 27 \times 37$. {{qed}} Category:27 Category:Examples of Reciprocals dqrjepi3jc57oo9qvkiy5dr...
:$\dfrac 1 {27} = 0 \cdotp \dot 03 \dot 7$
Performing the calculation using [[Definition:Long Division|long division]]: <pre> 0.037... -------- 27)1.00000 81 -- 190 189 --- 100 81 --- ... </pre> It is to be noted that this is because $999 = 27 \times 37$. {{qed}} [[Category:27]] [[Category:Examples ...
Reciprocal of 27
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reciprocal_of_27
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reciprocal_of_27
[ "27", "Examples of Reciprocals" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Classical Algorithm/Division", "Category:27", "Category:Examples of Reciprocals" ]
proofwiki-20598
Reciprocal of 101
:$\dfrac 1 {101} = 0 \cdotp \dot 009 \dot 9$
Performing the calculation using long division: <pre> 0.00990099... -------------- 101)1.00000000... 909 --- 910 909 --- 1000 909 ---- 910 909 --- ... </pre> {{qed}} Category:101 Category:Examples of Reciproc...
:$\dfrac 1 {101} = 0 \cdotp \dot 009 \dot 9$
Performing the calculation using [[Definition:Long Division|long division]]: <pre> 0.00990099... -------------- 101)1.00000000... 909 --- 910 909 --- 1000 909 ---- 910 909 --- ... </pre> {{qed}} [[Category:...
Reciprocal of 101
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reciprocal_of_101
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reciprocal_of_101
[ "101", "Examples of Reciprocals" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Classical Algorithm/Division", "Category:101", "Category:Examples of Reciprocals" ]
proofwiki-20599
Reciprocal of 19
:$\dfrac 1 {19} = 0 \cdotp \dot 05263 \, 15789 \, 47368 \, 42 \dot 1$
Performing the calculation using long division: <pre> 0.05263157894736842105... ------------------------ 19)1.00000000000000000000000 95 152 76 -- --- -- 50 180 40 38 171 38 -- --- -- 120 90 20 114 76 19 --- -- ...
:$\dfrac 1 {19} = 0 \cdotp \dot 05263 \, 15789 \, 47368 \, 42 \dot 1$
Performing the calculation using [[Definition:Long Division|long division]]: <pre> 0.05263157894736842105... ------------------------ 19)1.00000000000000000000000 95 152 76 -- --- -- 50 180 40 38 171 38 -- --- -- 120 90 20 114 ...
Reciprocal of 19
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reciprocal_of_19
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reciprocal_of_19
[ "19", "Examples of Reciprocals" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Classical Algorithm/Division", "Category:19", "Category:Examples of Reciprocals" ]