daniel2588/sarcasmdata · Datasets at Hugging Face

label int64 0 1	text stringlengths 7 1.31k
0	here's why we need to stop criticizing lebron james
0	a progressive firm fired a partner for allegedly assaulting a female staffer. soon she was gone, too.
1	bold intern giving parents tour of office
0	Again that is a poor analogy. Congress does not have any powers NOT included in the Constitution. Quite the opposite, it specifically says that any powers NOT included in the Constitution is defaulted to the states and Congress is additionally prohibited from taking any more authority NOT named in the Constitution.Since there is no specific naming article saying Congress does not have the power to ban manufacturing weapons, in fact it DOES NOT. According to the 10th Amendment:The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.Thus you have another poor analogy. Congress DOES NOT have the right to ban manufacture of guns.
0	here are the months college students are more likely to experiment with new drugs
0	jamie foxx does a really good doc rivers impersonation
0	the best way to eat avocados: avocado pasta
0	jennifer lopez's new video is a sad premonition of the future of feminism
0	3d-printed 'eyes' could help blind children's faces grow naturally
0	a frequent flighter's tips for drinking wine responsibly
0	10 rom-coms love addicts should avoid
1	This coming from someone that is very choosy in the question that they answeremoticonXRolleyes
0	this is the consequence of overinflated footballs, tom brady
1	man somehow overcomes alcoholism without jesus
0	'vacation is when i have a 40-hour week'
0	dating in my 20's: 12 tips i wish i knew to prepare myself for love
0	anti-donald trump forces gear up for third-party challenge
0	david blaine's attempt to catch a bullet in his mouth went painfully wrong
0	american muslims and philanthropy
1	Are you blind? I was refering to Nancy Pelosi's "'fair' speech" policies, not free speech. Fair speech is an attempt to limit free speech.
1	report: iraq war keeping thousands out of unemployment line
1	tsa agents to now simply stand at checkpoints and remind passengers that we all die someday
1	freeloading refugee children taking up thousands of prison cells meant for real americans
1	study: u.s. best place for women to buy jeans
1	There is the potential for a human that comes out of many, crude and vulgar things. Some end up on a maxi pad or when a guy reaches for the box of Kleenex. Should I feel a special bond with the conceptions rudely flushed out because they couldn't make it to the uterine wall? They had the potential, the DNA, were once a life too, and made a valiant effort. Life is constantly in motion. We don't value all life, or maybe not all life the same. When it appears to have some aspects of human personhood, this would seem like a logical marker, where we'd place greater value.
0	what really happened to luke at the end of 'star wars: the last jedi'
1	elizabeth warren spends evenings tutoring underperforming candidates on creating comprehensive policy
1	hostage negotiation talks stall in congress
1	report: 65% of all wildlife now used as homosexual subculture signifier
1	A magnanimous troll is nearly an oxymoron but you are a complete m*ron. NATO was making a valid statement not being a victim..you are the one with the chip on your shoulder whineyemoticonXClown
1	ryan seacrest catches up with 'captain phillips' star maersk alabama on red carpet
1	report: it okay to spend rest of day curled in fetal position under desk
0	will trump fire rosenstein? it may not matter.
1	row of asterisks spices up otherwise ordinary e-mail
0	'she's in king david cemetery. that is where i go to see my kid now.'
0	What is astounding about it? If we had been aborted, we wouldn't have known anything about it. Untold billions of conceptions have been spontaneously aborted. Do you shed tears for those, too?
1	vin diesel breaks off tracking collar against rocky outcropping
1	usda admits weight loss not possible for people who don't like salmon
0	inside cbs' bid to bolster 'late show with stephen colbert'
0	how peter thiel's gawker battle could open a war against the press
1	Well that lets out most of the supreme court when RvW comes up! And of course 1/2 give or take of the voters would be disqualified if relevant issues come up to a vote. Perhaps we should start an effort to amend the constitution to incorporate your idea!
0	two perspectives: assisted dying or assisted living?
0	chagas disease: a 2014 world cup yellow card
1	trump thanks united nations for inviting him to their country
0	this is how we know daca didn't cause the border crisis
1	scientists politely remind world that clean energy technology ready to go whenever
1	new roommate bestows apartment with unexpected windfall of end tables
0	but she can talk?
1	health experts urge parents to dramatically reduce childrens' on-screen time
0	miami-dade county bans styrofoam from parks, beaches
0	amelia boynton robinson, civil rights activist, dies at 104
1	god legally changes name to jake steele
1	So you are pro-life and you hate liberals? Actually Republicans are being liberal in this case (liberal=bigger government, more laws). But I'll assume you mean Democrats on this. What if the baby is a democrat? If it's a democratic parent it's most likely it will grow up democratic and one more person to attempt to keep abortion legal.
1	4 senators mauled during congressional tiger show
0	'god' tells colbert that all these religious site visits make trump seem thirsty
0	here's how to get republicans to change their minds on the minimum wage
0	this photo of me at the women's march went viral and changed my activism forever
1	Dear smiling, friendly, forgiving Archangel: I would be quite happy to respond to you if you could organize your incoherent mental states into logical, debatable points. Please refer to Chester's Questions for Bible-thumpers for guidelines. As for staying on topic: since there is no God, it is rather pointless to have religious ceremonies in any case, isn't it? As for my nom de Web, you have missed the point altogether. Either you are not quick on the uptake and/or you are completely ignorant of the Japanese language. Hint: surely you have seen the starry emblem on all Subaru cars? To end on a conciliatory note: I entirely agree with the last sentence of your posting [except the punctuation]. -
0	how to encourage quiet children to push past their fears
1	guillermo del toro makes first appearance with new monster wife at venice film festival
1	Not nearly as tired as the "YOU can't live like that because it is against MY religion" argument. Hell, that one pre-dates Christianity!
1	area man thinks girlfriend's sister might be a little cuter
1	Interestingly everyone but 'the left' can assimilate what is being said, however, the left is notorious for their ever-present attitude that everyone else is mindless. You don't got no brownie points.....
0	see how well you know the news with huffpost's headline quiz on google home
0	this school gave kids more recess. here's what happened.
0	top democrats defend bill clinton meeting with loretta lynch
1	woman has drawn-on eyebrows, nose, eyes, mouth
1	report: sharks to only kill 10 people this year but one of them will be you
0	12 things cool moms do to embarrass their teen sons
0	But the question is Can you prove your belief system is true? And all you've done is spew hate for religion but haven't even tried to actually answer the question. And ask yourself this. If the idea of God is such a man made plague, then God doesn't even exist right ? So if God doesn't exist then what has He done to you to make you so venomous and angry at him ? Why would you be so angry at a non existent being ? I challenge you to come up with a rational answer.
0	And I just say that it would be unjust and unfair of you to force metaphysical belief systems of your own which constitute religious belief upon your follows who may believe otherwise than you. Get pregnant and treat your fetus as a full person if you wish, nobody will force you to abort it. Let others follow their own beliefs differing or the same. Otherwise you attempt to obtain justice by doing injustice.Mo
1	Uhhhh, I just said that I DO JUDGE! So what in the hell are you talking about? You're not well. I didn't bother to adress your points about slavery because there's no point. I disagree with your claims as I suspect would most historians. But it doesn't surprise me that Christians would try to claim that they ended slavery since they also try to falsely claim they founded the country.
1	paul ryan wondering if he should have told romney about this guy he's dating
1	jaws of death used to stuff woman into burning car
0	watch: underreported story -- reuniting families with remains of dead migrants
0	turkey's president calls hitler's germany example of effective government
1	employee wishes he had enough job security to voice opinion
1	boyfriend can really envision losing his sense of self long-term with this one
0	This judge stated that it was UN-Constitutional (according to California Constitution) to limit marriage to opposite-gender couples. So . . . . . why did we vote in 2000 on the definition of marriage? And since the majority stated that marriage was between one man and one woman - why was that not taken into consideration with this ruling? Why is it that when the people speak their voice, it is IGNORED?? Not only the mayor of SF - but this Superior Court judge as well?
1	berkeley campus on lockdown after loose pages from 'wall street journal' found on park bench
1	whale won't shut up about time it was beached
0	happy birthday america
1	man reserving judgment on best actress nominees until looking at all 5 pictures
0	a letter to ashtanga
1	palin unveils 9/11 firefighter cousin, reformed lesbian niece, naturalized mexican half brother
1	last remaining novelist dies in captivity
1	prescription bottle recommends taking 10 tablets if you really want to fly
1	affable anti-semite thinks the jews are doing super job with the media
1	overweight woman encased in geo metro
1	bill cosby feeling better about retrial now that climate around sexual assault has cooled down
0	laverne cox opens up about cisgender actors playing transgender women
0	rachel zenzinger deserves to return to colorado state senate
0	That's good. You're right, all we can do is hope and pray (I pray for things like this every day, and in a way, God has answered my prayer in this case).
0	montana gop candidate owns stake in company accused of paying off isis
0	i didn't have this end in mind
0	35 things in your home to get rid of right now
1	gary johnson worried he peaking too early after hitting 9% in polls
0	If the fetus is human is not relevant? So if everyone says it is human then it still doesn't have a right to live then huh? Do you really support the killing of an innocent life for whatever reason? Do you really think placing one human over another is good (in this case women is more important then baby)?
1	scientists claim solar energy will be capable of powering 95% of scorchlands outposts by 2085
0	the real reason your hands are always cold

0

here's why we need to stop criticizing lebron james

0

a progressive firm fired a partner for allegedly assaulting a female staffer. soon she was gone, too.

1

bold intern giving parents tour of office

0

Again that is a poor analogy. Congress does not have any powers NOT included in the Constitution. Quite the opposite, it specifically says that any powers NOT included in the Constitution is defaulted to the states and Congress is additionally prohibited from taking any more authority NOT named in the Constitution.Since there is no specific naming article saying Congress does not have the power to ban manufacturing weapons, in fact it DOES NOT. According to the 10th Amendment:The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.Thus you have another poor analogy. Congress DOES NOT have the right to ban manufacture of guns.

0

here are the months college students are more likely to experiment with new drugs

0

jamie foxx does a really good doc rivers impersonation

0

the best way to eat avocados: avocado pasta

0

jennifer lopez's new video is a sad premonition of the future of feminism

0

3d-printed 'eyes' could help blind children's faces grow naturally

0

a frequent flighter's tips for drinking wine responsibly

0

10 rom-coms love addicts should avoid

1

This coming from someone that is very choosy in the question that they answeremoticonXRolleyes

0

this is the consequence of overinflated footballs, tom brady

1

man somehow overcomes alcoholism without jesus

0

'vacation is when i have a 40-hour week'

0

dating in my 20's: 12 tips i wish i knew to prepare myself for love

0

anti-donald trump forces gear up for third-party challenge

0

david blaine's attempt to catch a bullet in his mouth went painfully wrong

0

american muslims and philanthropy

1

Are you blind? I was refering to Nancy Pelosi's "'fair' speech" policies, not free speech. Fair speech is an attempt to limit free speech.

1

report: iraq war keeping thousands out of unemployment line

1

tsa agents to now simply stand at checkpoints and remind passengers that we all die someday

1

freeloading refugee children taking up thousands of prison cells meant for real americans

1

study: u.s. best place for women to buy jeans

1

There is the potential for a human that comes out of many, crude and vulgar things. Some end up on a maxi pad or when a guy reaches for the box of Kleenex. Should I feel a special bond with the conceptions rudely flushed out because they couldn't make it to the uterine wall? They had the potential, the DNA, were once a life too, and made a valiant effort. Life is constantly in motion. We don't value all life, or maybe not all life the same. When it appears to have some aspects of human personhood, this would seem like a logical marker, where we'd place greater value.

0

what really happened to luke at the end of 'star wars: the last jedi'

1

elizabeth warren spends evenings tutoring underperforming candidates on creating comprehensive policy

1

hostage negotiation talks stall in congress

1

report: 65% of all wildlife now used as homosexual subculture signifier

1

A magnanimous troll is nearly an oxymoron but you are a complete m*ron. NATO was making a valid statement not being a victim..you are the one with the chip on your shoulder whineyemoticonXClown

1

ryan seacrest catches up with 'captain phillips' star maersk alabama on red carpet

1

report: it okay to spend rest of day curled in fetal position under desk

0

will trump fire rosenstein? it may not matter.

1

row of asterisks spices up otherwise ordinary e-mail

0

'she's in king david cemetery. that is where i go to see my kid now.'

0

What is astounding about it? If we had been aborted, we wouldn't have known anything about it. Untold billions of conceptions have been spontaneously aborted. Do you shed tears for those, too?

1

vin diesel breaks off tracking collar against rocky outcropping

1

usda admits weight loss not possible for people who don't like salmon

0

inside cbs' bid to bolster 'late show with stephen colbert'

0

how peter thiel's gawker battle could open a war against the press

1

Well that lets out most of the supreme court when RvW comes up! And of course 1/2 give or take of the voters would be disqualified if relevant issues come up to a vote. Perhaps we should start an effort to amend the constitution to incorporate your idea!

0

two perspectives: assisted dying or assisted living?

0

chagas disease: a 2014 world cup yellow card

1

trump thanks united nations for inviting him to their country

0

this is how we know daca didn't cause the border crisis

1

scientists politely remind world that clean energy technology ready to go whenever

1

new roommate bestows apartment with unexpected windfall of end tables

0

but she can talk?

1

health experts urge parents to dramatically reduce childrens' on-screen time

0

miami-dade county bans styrofoam from parks, beaches

0

amelia boynton robinson, civil rights activist, dies at 104

1

god legally changes name to jake steele

1

So you are pro-life and you hate liberals? Actually Republicans are being liberal in this case (liberal=bigger government, more laws). But I'll assume you mean Democrats on this. What if the baby is a democrat? If it's a democratic parent it's most likely it will grow up democratic and one more person to attempt to keep abortion legal.

1

4 senators mauled during congressional tiger show

0

'god' tells colbert that all these religious site visits make trump seem thirsty

0

here's how to get republicans to change their minds on the minimum wage

0

this photo of me at the women's march went viral and changed my activism forever

1

Dear smiling, friendly, forgiving Archangel: I would be quite happy to respond to you if you could organize your incoherent mental states into logical, debatable points. Please refer to Chester's Questions for Bible-thumpers for guidelines. As for staying on topic: since there is no God, it is rather pointless to have religious ceremonies in any case, isn't it? As for my nom de Web, you have missed the point altogether. Either you are not quick on the uptake and/or you are completely ignorant of the Japanese language. Hint: surely you have seen the starry emblem on all Subaru cars? To end on a conciliatory note: I entirely agree with the last sentence of your posting [except the punctuation]. -

0

how to encourage quiet children to push past their fears

1

guillermo del toro makes first appearance with new monster wife at venice film festival

1

Not nearly as tired as the "YOU can't live like that because it is against MY religion" argument. Hell, that one pre-dates Christianity!

1

area man thinks girlfriend's sister might be a little cuter

1

Interestingly everyone but 'the left' can assimilate what is being said, however, the left is notorious for their ever-present attitude that everyone else is mindless. You don't got no brownie points.....

0

see how well you know the news with huffpost's headline quiz on google home

0

this school gave kids more recess. here's what happened.

0

top democrats defend bill clinton meeting with loretta lynch

1

woman has drawn-on eyebrows, nose, eyes, mouth

1

report: sharks to only kill 10 people this year but one of them will be you

0

12 things cool moms do to embarrass their teen sons

0

But the question is Can you prove your belief system is true? And all you've done is spew hate for religion but haven't even tried to actually answer the question. And ask yourself this. If the idea of God is such a man made plague, then God doesn't even exist right ? So if God doesn't exist then what has He done to you to make you so venomous and angry at him ? Why would you be so angry at a non existent being ? I challenge you to come up with a rational answer.

0

And I just say that it would be unjust and unfair of you to force metaphysical belief systems of your own which constitute religious belief upon your follows who may believe otherwise than you. Get pregnant and treat your fetus as a full person if you wish, nobody will force you to abort it. Let others follow their own beliefs differing or the same. Otherwise you attempt to obtain justice by doing injustice.Mo

1

Uhhhh, I just said that I DO JUDGE! So what in the hell are you talking about? You're not well. I didn't bother to adress your points about slavery because there's no point. I disagree with your claims as I suspect would most historians. But it doesn't surprise me that Christians would try to claim that they ended slavery since they also try to falsely claim they founded the country.

1

paul ryan wondering if he should have told romney about this guy he's dating

1

jaws of death used to stuff woman into burning car

0

watch: underreported story -- reuniting families with remains of dead migrants

0

turkey's president calls hitler's germany example of effective government

1

employee wishes he had enough job security to voice opinion

1

boyfriend can really envision losing his sense of self long-term with this one

0

This judge stated that it was UN-Constitutional (according to California Constitution) to limit marriage to opposite-gender couples. So . . . . . why did we vote in 2000 on the definition of marriage? And since the majority stated that marriage was between one man and one woman - why was that not taken into consideration with this ruling? Why is it that when the people speak their voice, it is IGNORED?? Not only the mayor of SF - but this Superior Court judge as well?

1

berkeley campus on lockdown after loose pages from 'wall street journal' found on park bench

1

whale won't shut up about time it was beached

0

happy birthday america

1

man reserving judgment on best actress nominees until looking at all 5 pictures

0

a letter to ashtanga

1

palin unveils 9/11 firefighter cousin, reformed lesbian niece, naturalized mexican half brother

1

last remaining novelist dies in captivity

1

prescription bottle recommends taking 10 tablets if you really want to fly

1

affable anti-semite thinks the jews are doing super job with the media

1

overweight woman encased in geo metro

1

bill cosby feeling better about retrial now that climate around sexual assault has cooled down

0

laverne cox opens up about cisgender actors playing transgender women

0

rachel zenzinger deserves to return to colorado state senate

0

That's good. You're right, all we can do is hope and pray (I pray for things like this every day, and in a way, God has answered my prayer in this case).

0

montana gop candidate owns stake in company accused of paying off isis

0

i didn't have this end in mind

0

35 things in your home to get rid of right now

1

gary johnson worried he peaking too early after hitting 9% in polls

0

If the fetus is human is not relevant? So if everyone says it is human then it still doesn't have a right to live then huh? Do you really support the killing of an innocent life for whatever reason? Do you really think placing one human over another is good (in this case women is more important then baby)?

1

scientists claim solar energy will be capable of powering 95% of scorchlands outposts by 2085

0

the real reason your hands are always cold