daniel2588/sarcasmdata · Datasets at Hugging Face

label int64 0 1	text stringlengths 7 1.31k
1	No. Not only are you wrong, you seem to lack the integrity to learn the basics of what you claim to oppose. You oppose evolution you say, but you have no idea of what it is. Most educated creationists not only admit evolution, they propose evolution at rates that make real biologists laugh.
0	twitter thinks apple's homepod looks like a roll of toilet paper
1	Where? I don't see it. My monkey brain's fine but my eyes aren't what they used to be. I'm guessing we're through discussing the legality of armed self-defense in Australia given the flurry of OT links?
0	americans finally found something to drink that's better than soda
1	Most don't really see much wrong with pre-marital sex. http://www.pollingreport.com/values.htm Welcome to the 21st century. No, welcome to the 20th century first. -Wez
0	trail to the chief: inaugural edition
1	woman mentally rearranging rankings of children while opening mother's day gifts
1	obama purchases ad space on side of mccain's bus
1	college allowing students individual commencement speakers to make ceremony acceptable for all
1	So your position is that the writers of the marriage statutes when laws were first formed fully intended for homosexuals to be included? If that's the position you're cornered to, I have no problem leaving you with your delusion ;)
1	In the thousands of scientific papers that present the thousands of bits of evidence that go to prove evolution beyond all sensible sane and reasonable doubt.
1	panicked john kelly ushers half-naked trump away from podium as president shouts support for eugenics
0	dope cannabis lifestyle brand is unapologetically asian-american
1	85 percent of u.s. cole slaw remains uneaten
0	Well, there are several problems with your post. 1) You misunderstand the term 'THEORY' when applied to scientific theory's. A theory is a model to try to explain the FACTS. WHen it comes to evolution, the theory of evolution is a model to try to explain the observed fact that evolution happens. Second of all, Humans and modern apes share the same ancestor. From a biological point of view, humans ARE apes that have a specialised brain. The third problem is many religious people take much of the bible as allegorical. That means they are able to reconcilate such things as scientific fact, (evolution, expanding universe, age of the universe, biology, geology and physics), and their belief in God.
1	barbra streisand to take rare public dump
0	asian immigrants becoming us citizens at high rate
0	'night of a thousand judys' is a pride month event you shouldn't miss
0	4 simple ways to stay grounded and stress-free during the holidays
0	why progressives are cautiously optimistic about hillary clinton
1	This is odd. You voluntarily participate in a Religion discussion forum - indeed, the frequency of your posting suggests that this participation occupies a substantial portion of your leisure time - but when someone presents you with the opportunity to demonstrate the validity of your position, you 'have better things to do'.
1	church sign vandalized by satan
0	deputy interior secretary met with lobbyist for a casino his former firm also represents
0	the human and financial cost of pollution
1	man running toward departing train must have finally realized he loves her
0	One shouldn't assume ignorance on the part of creationists. That is a mistake that too many evolutionists make. In the real world, we have people willing to say things they already know isn't true. Why should creationists be any different? After all, they are people, too. But rather than accept that fact, evolutionists argue that creationists are ignorant of a subject when, in reality, they (creationists) were simply telling lies.
0	how to spot your future ex-husband on the very first date
1	'he's not right for you,' report relationship experts who must not want to see you be happy
1	overweight man repeatedly introduced to overweight woman at party
1	In my lifetime, we've made huge strides, but there's a lot more to learn.
0	gregg popovich goes full throttle on 'soulless coward' donald trump
0	marketers -- when is "who and why?" more important than "where?"
1	two-faced house guest who didn't need anything suddenly wants glass of water
0	The empire you defend is tyrannical. They are responsible for the death of millions.
0	Well stated. Whatever the reason, the new culture of ridicule IS there. When you see the in person comments of Dawkins, Provine, Myers, you'll know where posters here get it from. I hope you'll watch the movie, and post up what you think.
0	why i know turning 60 will be one big party
1	That must be why they like to wear boots in Texas.
1	a classic jason somehow gets mixed into area man's anecdote collection
0	women may be more anxious than men at work because they have more to lose
0	steven spielberg bashes virtual reality at cannes
0	pre-holiday jerry brown preps for term 4
1	mama duck doesn't recall asking for injured baby to be rescued from road
0	They originally might have been an arbitrary guess, but experience of all humans always has given them a very high probability of being true (at least the existence of the outside world, the others are abstract logical concepts that don't have a physical reality, just an abstract one).
1	personal philosophy stolen from martin luther king jr.
1	onion social ceo promises algorithm will now automatically label racist, sexist content as 'debatable'
0	swiping right on a hottie? hold on a second
1	god humbled to be the answer to 'jeopardy!' clue
0	"they said, i'm sorry, because you weren't physically injured, you can't go to the private events."
1	revolutionary new homophobia immersion therapy involves lowering patient into tank of gays
0	supreme court puts redrawing of texas electoral maps on hold
0	donald trump actually tries to explain his wall to stephen colbert
0	Then, how much money should spend on the war on terror? Should we bankrupt the country to do it? Is it necessary to spend so much that we go bankrupt, or is it better to wisely spend the money we have and to fight an intellegent war against terror?
0	I have heard that the USA spends around 40% (total) more on health care than Canada does. That would be impressive if it weren't for one fact. The USA has 900% of our population. It is your administration costs what are getting you the most. We only spend around 11% on administration while the USA spends around 25% of their health care dollars. We have a cap on how much a doctor can be sued for as well. Yes, our system isn't perfect, but it still works.Nearly 50 million Americans don't have health care at all, that is around 18% of your total population. This is quite shameful. As I've stated, the USA is the only Nation in the Industrialize world to not have universal health care.
0	But the sea and sky are the same regardless. I would say the sailor conceives the information with language. He infers the information with language.
1	bush extremely proud of new suit
1	new okcupid feature alerts users when it's time to come crawling back
1	The point that seemingly escapes you is that not even in the most wonderful country on the planet in all of human history has free speech been considered an absolute right that nothing can limit in any way. Thank you for comprehending. Not.
0	a stunning look inside an abandoned french chateau
1	fatal school bus crash cements bff status
0	garbage truck scoops up man looking for wallet
0	bee attack sends 3 to the hospital
1	horrible facebook algorithm accident results in exposure to new ideas
1	frugal couple saves money by making own porn
1	The critical factor here is punishing women. Women must be punished. For whatever strikes the fancy of Cybererratus.
1	diners eating impossible burgers doused with beet juice by protesting meat-rights activists
0	new rule from obama will punish contractors who cheat or endanger workers
0	barb from 'stranger things' is pissed she was left in the upside down
1	Will the Catholics ever elect somebody who is not a complete knob? He speaks just like he knows something about gay relationships. emoticonXRolleyes
0	white house lawyer insists trump isn't considering firing mueller
0	americans aren't thrilled with trump's threat of 'fire and fury' against north korea
0	the resurrection according to scifi, part 3: harry potter
0	'octopussy' villain louis jourdan dead at 93
1	stupid thing won't work
1	Reading comprehension not among your skill sets eh simone? Splain to us how this 2000+ page monster is going to relieve the problem will you. While you are at it, let us know where you got your fitional 50 million number. Lots of people will die, insurance is no guarantee of life baby. Get real
1	jay-z vows not to lose touch with millionaire roots on gritty throwback track about buying first yacht
0	But doesn't Genesis imply that creation occured in one 7-day period (though the days could be symbollic)?
0	accused father and son urinal thieves flushed out by cops
0	texas public school districts may now store, not trash, leftover food
1	'rocketman' viewers not sure movie really needed 45-minute princess diana death scene
1	bel-air homeowners association issues fine to resident with unapproved wildfire in front yard
0	where to find the duchess of cambridge's birth announcement dress
0	10 things that really make my head explode
0	watch: experts talk pesticides and health
1	u.s. government opens special 5,000-acre area where americans can go blow off steam
0	why america's public media can't do its job
1	smiley face doodled on check commemorates undeniable chemistry between waiter, ericson family
1	search for 'kick-ass shelves' continues
1	virulent strain of soy flu traced to single tofurkey
0	8 lessons for life while traveling
0	highway sign hacked to show crude message about donald trump
0	is a four-day school week a good idea?
0	several injured by accidental gunfire at waldorf astoria wedding party
0	You know how those anti-gunners are?they just kinda get stuck in that same old revolving door.Can't come up with anything new so they rehash.
0	Why so many claims in opposition? I make a single claim, that can be refuted through logic, if it's fallacy. But the claim is correct.This new claim is an interesting one that I have seen others use. I'll tell you on what basis. Based on reason. To hold that nothing can be known for certain, is ultimately reduced to absurd unintelligble nonsense. I'll start a thread about this claim, it's a hot topic to be sure!
1	Me thinks thou dost be too kind. Yon creature willst make the false charge in any event. emoticonXKill
1	area man's favorite things all types of meat
0	I take it you have no understanding of science, much less the scientific method?
0	His point was criticism of people managing the numbers of their population with abortion. It also addresses the intentional overpopulation for the purpose of overwhelming declining populations.
1	authority figure demands to know meaning of this
1	...Because everyone knows there are no married men sexually abusing children. emoticonXConfused

1

No. Not only are you wrong, you seem to lack the integrity to learn the basics of what you claim to oppose. You oppose evolution you say, but you have no idea of what it is. Most educated creationists not only admit evolution, they propose evolution at rates that make real biologists laugh.

0

twitter thinks apple's homepod looks like a roll of toilet paper

1

Where? I don't see it. My monkey brain's fine but my eyes aren't what they used to be. I'm guessing we're through discussing the legality of armed self-defense in Australia given the flurry of OT links?

0

americans finally found something to drink that's better than soda

1

Most don't really see much wrong with pre-marital sex. http://www.pollingreport.com/values.htm Welcome to the 21st century. No, welcome to the 20th century first. -Wez

0

trail to the chief: inaugural edition

1

woman mentally rearranging rankings of children while opening mother's day gifts

1

obama purchases ad space on side of mccain's bus

1

college allowing students individual commencement speakers to make ceremony acceptable for all

1

So your position is that the writers of the marriage statutes when laws were first formed fully intended for homosexuals to be included? If that's the position you're cornered to, I have no problem leaving you with your delusion ;)

1

In the thousands of scientific papers that present the thousands of bits of evidence that go to prove evolution beyond all sensible sane and reasonable doubt.

1

panicked john kelly ushers half-naked trump away from podium as president shouts support for eugenics

0

dope cannabis lifestyle brand is unapologetically asian-american

1

85 percent of u.s. cole slaw remains uneaten

0

Well, there are several problems with your post. 1) You misunderstand the term 'THEORY' when applied to scientific theory's. A theory is a model to try to explain the FACTS. WHen it comes to evolution, the theory of evolution is a model to try to explain the observed fact that evolution happens. Second of all, Humans and modern apes share the same ancestor. From a biological point of view, humans ARE apes that have a specialised brain. The third problem is many religious people take much of the bible as allegorical. That means they are able to reconcilate such things as scientific fact, (evolution, expanding universe, age of the universe, biology, geology and physics), and their belief in God.

1

barbra streisand to take rare public dump

0

asian immigrants becoming us citizens at high rate

0

'night of a thousand judys' is a pride month event you shouldn't miss

0

4 simple ways to stay grounded and stress-free during the holidays

0

why progressives are cautiously optimistic about hillary clinton

1

This is odd. You voluntarily participate in a Religion discussion forum - indeed, the frequency of your posting suggests that this participation occupies a substantial portion of your leisure time - but when someone presents you with the opportunity to demonstrate the validity of your position, you 'have better things to do'.

1

church sign vandalized by satan

0

deputy interior secretary met with lobbyist for a casino his former firm also represents

0

the human and financial cost of pollution

1

man running toward departing train must have finally realized he loves her

0

One shouldn't assume ignorance on the part of creationists. That is a mistake that too many evolutionists make. In the real world, we have people willing to say things they already know isn't true. Why should creationists be any different? After all, they are people, too. But rather than accept that fact, evolutionists argue that creationists are ignorant of a subject when, in reality, they (creationists) were simply telling lies.

0

how to spot your future ex-husband on the very first date

1

'he's not right for you,' report relationship experts who must not want to see you be happy

1

overweight man repeatedly introduced to overweight woman at party

1

In my lifetime, we've made huge strides, but there's a lot more to learn.

0

gregg popovich goes full throttle on 'soulless coward' donald trump

0

marketers -- when is "who and why?" more important than "where?"

1

two-faced house guest who didn't need anything suddenly wants glass of water

0

The empire you defend is tyrannical. They are responsible for the death of millions.

0

Well stated. Whatever the reason, the new culture of ridicule IS there. When you see the in person comments of Dawkins, Provine, Myers, you'll know where posters here get it from. I hope you'll watch the movie, and post up what you think.

0

why i know turning 60 will be one big party

1

That must be why they like to wear boots in Texas.

1

a classic jason somehow gets mixed into area man's anecdote collection

0

women may be more anxious than men at work because they have more to lose

0

steven spielberg bashes virtual reality at cannes

0

pre-holiday jerry brown preps for term 4

1

mama duck doesn't recall asking for injured baby to be rescued from road

0

They originally might have been an arbitrary guess, but experience of all humans always has given them a very high probability of being true (at least the existence of the outside world, the others are abstract logical concepts that don't have a physical reality, just an abstract one).

1

personal philosophy stolen from martin luther king jr.

1

onion social ceo promises algorithm will now automatically label racist, sexist content as 'debatable'

0

swiping right on a hottie? hold on a second

1

god humbled to be the answer to 'jeopardy!' clue

0

"they said, i'm sorry, because you weren't physically injured, you can't go to the private events."

1

revolutionary new homophobia immersion therapy involves lowering patient into tank of gays

0

supreme court puts redrawing of texas electoral maps on hold

0

donald trump actually tries to explain his wall to stephen colbert

0

Then, how much money should spend on the war on terror? Should we bankrupt the country to do it? Is it necessary to spend so much that we go bankrupt, or is it better to wisely spend the money we have and to fight an intellegent war against terror?

0

I have heard that the USA spends around 40% (total) more on health care than Canada does. That would be impressive if it weren't for one fact. The USA has 900% of our population. It is your administration costs what are getting you the most. We only spend around 11% on administration while the USA spends around 25% of their health care dollars. We have a cap on how much a doctor can be sued for as well. Yes, our system isn't perfect, but it still works.Nearly 50 million Americans don't have health care at all, that is around 18% of your total population. This is quite shameful. As I've stated, the USA is the only Nation in the Industrialize world to not have universal health care.

0

But the sea and sky are the same regardless. I would say the sailor conceives the information with language. He infers the information with language.

1

bush extremely proud of new suit

1

new okcupid feature alerts users when it's time to come crawling back

1

The point that seemingly escapes you is that not even in the most wonderful country on the planet in all of human history has free speech been considered an absolute right that nothing can limit in any way. Thank you for comprehending. Not.

0

a stunning look inside an abandoned french chateau

1

fatal school bus crash cements bff status

0

garbage truck scoops up man looking for wallet

0

bee attack sends 3 to the hospital

1

horrible facebook algorithm accident results in exposure to new ideas

1

frugal couple saves money by making own porn

1

The critical factor here is punishing women. Women must be punished. For whatever strikes the fancy of Cybererratus.

1

diners eating impossible burgers doused with beet juice by protesting meat-rights activists

0

new rule from obama will punish contractors who cheat or endanger workers

0

barb from 'stranger things' is pissed she was left in the upside down

1

Will the Catholics ever elect somebody who is not a complete knob? He speaks just like he knows something about gay relationships. emoticonXRolleyes

0

white house lawyer insists trump isn't considering firing mueller

0

americans aren't thrilled with trump's threat of 'fire and fury' against north korea

0

the resurrection according to scifi, part 3: harry potter

0

'octopussy' villain louis jourdan dead at 93

1

stupid thing won't work

1

Reading comprehension not among your skill sets eh simone? Splain to us how this 2000+ page monster is going to relieve the problem will you. While you are at it, let us know where you got your fitional 50 million number. Lots of people will die, insurance is no guarantee of life baby. Get real

1

jay-z vows not to lose touch with millionaire roots on gritty throwback track about buying first yacht

0

But doesn't Genesis imply that creation occured in one 7-day period (though the days could be symbollic)?

0

accused father and son urinal thieves flushed out by cops

0

texas public school districts may now store, not trash, leftover food

1

'rocketman' viewers not sure movie really needed 45-minute princess diana death scene

1

bel-air homeowners association issues fine to resident with unapproved wildfire in front yard

0

where to find the duchess of cambridge's birth announcement dress

0

10 things that really make my head explode

0

watch: experts talk pesticides and health

1

u.s. government opens special 5,000-acre area where americans can go blow off steam

0

why america's public media can't do its job

1

smiley face doodled on check commemorates undeniable chemistry between waiter, ericson family

1

search for 'kick-ass shelves' continues

1

virulent strain of soy flu traced to single tofurkey

0

8 lessons for life while traveling

0

highway sign hacked to show crude message about donald trump

0

is a four-day school week a good idea?

0

several injured by accidental gunfire at waldorf astoria wedding party

0

You know how those anti-gunners are?they just kinda get stuck in that same old revolving door.Can't come up with anything new so they rehash.

0

Why so many claims in opposition? I make a single claim, that can be refuted through logic, if it's fallacy. But the claim is correct.This new claim is an interesting one that I have seen others use. I'll tell you on what basis. Based on reason. To hold that nothing can be known for certain, is ultimately reduced to absurd unintelligble nonsense. I'll start a thread about this claim, it's a hot topic to be sure!

1

Me thinks thou dost be too kind. Yon creature willst make the false charge in any event. emoticonXKill

1

area man's favorite things all types of meat

0

I take it you have no understanding of science, much less the scientific method?

0

His point was criticism of people managing the numbers of their population with abortion. It also addresses the intentional overpopulation for the purpose of overwhelming declining populations.

1

authority figure demands to know meaning of this

1

...Because everyone knows there are no married men sexually abusing children. emoticonXConfused