daniel2588/sarcasmdata · Datasets at Hugging Face

label int64 0 1	text stringlengths 7 1.31k
1	courtroom sketch artist has clear manga influences
0	fighting rages in aleppo as syrian rebels claim to break through siege
0	So atheism doesn't "need" facts? If it claims to have complete knowledge of evolution, doesn't it need all the facts? If the answer is no, then how can it argue against religion? Miller didn't explain it.
0	ian mckellen says actresses used to proposition directors for sex
1	paul ryan confident american people will warm up to tax plan once they realize life a cruel and meaningless farce
1	pool owner has bathing suit that touched his penis you can borrow
1	missing kazakhstani nukes turn up in manhattan
1	trump administration refusing to disclose names of white house diamond elite members
1	house inappropriations committee suggests nation's women dress a little sexier
0	alice waters: 'we are digesting values' when we eat
1	bangladesh runs out of people
0	tourist scams, part 3: what to know before you go
1	westminster dog show finalists form elite iditarod team
0	aarp warns of sweepstakes scams
0	Well I'm not arguing that this is adaptation...I have never said that.. What I am saying is the environment -- in this case diet is the cause for these traits to emerge in offspring.....but like I said earlier ToE does not admit that the diet or any enviornmental variable can influence traits in offspring. Traits are dictated by genes and genes are closed off from the enviornment. This is the basic dogma of Weismann's barrier. I'm not necessarily calling this evolution....I'm just simply pointing out that acquired traits can be inherited. There is no other way to describe this other than Lamarckism. Do you disagree that The inheritance of acquired characteristics is simply changes in physiology acquired over the life of an organism that are transmitted to offspring?
0	epa chief scott pruitt avoids ordinary citizens on first trip to oil-rich north dakota
1	millions of excited americans gather to watch candidates deliver series of short, elaborately rehearsed speeches
0	mysterious american flags in northern syria were planted by u.s. troops, pentagon says
1	You don't get to just say "hey i wanna be Catholic" and make it so just because you said you wanted to be.
0	Well, the first part is true but I'm not sure I understand what you are saying in the second part. Science does not claim that intelligent design is false because science lacks the tools to examine the concept. ID is just another unsupported assertion outside the domain of science (and logic for that matter). ID has reached the stage of unsupported assertion without evidence. Science has better explanations.
0	most americans think donald trump shouldn't have to sell his companies to be president
1	arab-american actually kind of enjoys always having 2 bus seats to self
1	congressman lets his guitar do the talking
1	mueller kinda miffed that barr clearly didn't read his stuff like he said he would
1	Did your mummy read you scary stories when you were littler?
0	trevor noah eviscerates donald trump's love of stop-and-frisk
0	obama honors those who made the ultimate sacrifice on memorial day 2015
0	So what this guy is saying is that he believes in natural selection but not evolution?
0	trump uses daca setback to launch new attack on court system
1	troubling study finds majority of americans who got it aren't flaunting it
0	And I'm going to correct you again. The theory of evolution is by no means an extreme view. It is the prevailing view. More than 99% of biologists accept the theory of evolution as the best explanation for the observations.
0	here's how to become kris jenner's assistant, according to kris jenner
0	boundless - today's buddha doodle
1	Hey star gazer, how do you know he didn't provide those "private sellers" also? You understand a man bent on the law is willing to go all the way. I wouldn't believe him if his tongue was notorized. Pictures? LOl
1	photojournalist spends month in oval office blind to capture images of obama in natural habitat
1	north carolina elects someone to run out for cigarettes
0	guns and georgia
1	ron paul supporter likes the way paul tells it like it has no chance of being
0	therapy golden retriever helps comfort rape victims during counseling sessions
1	weary nation says one or two more divisive issues should finish it off
0	why we should value (but not worship) reason
1	trail of ants better be leading toward something delicious
0	how nice of dr. luke to now let kesha perform at the billboard music awards
1	calm sense of impending violence returns to middle east as ceasefire brokered
0	person of interest detained after california mosque 'firebombed'
1	Hmmm, was that an ad hominem attack? You know, what you accuse others of doing? Hypocrite.
0	baltimore police begin slow process of reform in year after freddie gray's death
0	I think that what you two are doing is simply trading evidences. Saying someone is 'wrong' and directing them to a atheist web-site is not proof. You should merely be saying, 'here is an alternative argument'I say this because I can access a number of science posts that state the exact opposite of what you say, and show that they can find evidence for a flood.
1	history teacher has unusual favorite president
0	best career advice: find a need and fill it
1	thousands of onion social users burn effigies of ceo in massive show of support for company
1	philip morris ceo forces senator to dance for his amusement
1	My pursuit of happiness is denied by trees existing. Let's burn them down and destroy the environment. It's much better than me being unhappy.
1	man captures ross perot, is granted three wishes
0	5 tips for reading the polls like a pro
1	st. christopher statue embedded in motorist's forehead
0	the true cost of turning on the lights
1	matt damon mans warner brothers booth at college campus's career day
1	man reluctantly deletes video of friend trying to vault mailbox to clear data space for child's birth
0	americans respond to trump's plans for country with #nobannowall
0	profiles in courage: sometimes it's the last place you think
0	netanyahu meets with donald trump, hillary clinton ahead of first debate
0	If guns laws don't affect criminals then how do you explain the low rates of criminal gun use in nations like the UK?
0	trump and the catholic schism
0	frat suspended after 'rape some b*****s' comment caught on tape
1	report: oyster cracker–wise, nation doing pretty good
1	sellout crowd greets sellout band
1	important piece of paper tragically smudged with breadstick grease
0	after seeing a fifth-grader get bullied, this group of boys vowed to stand up for him
1	al roker strongly considers retiring from creating the weather
0	the creators of 'supergirl' know that title is a bit misogynistic
1	that knife guy from high school arrested in knife-related incident
0	taking your startup public is fraught with negatives
0	bloomberg gadfly debuts in bid to shake-up financial commentary space
0	A more precise term would be "broaden," since nothing about the definition pertaining to the people currently covered by it would be affected, "diluted" or altered in any way anyone has yet demonstrated. Nothing about the definition that pertains to people who already are, or can be married changes one iota. Their rights, benefits, and protections remain exactly the same. The only "change" would be to other people, people who have no connection to, nor impact on, the marriages of anyone else: the gays who'll marry if the legal definition is broadened to encompass them. And the only "change" in that regard will be the fact that they are encompassed by it, nothing more. No substantive aspect of the definition as it currently stands changes in the slightest.The change is not in the definition itself. It's in who it applies to.
0	"True" is not a good use of language to describe opinion. With regard to his opinion, I think he makes some good points, so I don't really need to ask him if its true. You on the other hand do need to speak to Olsen as you are claiming his letter rubbishes the concept of evolution- an opinion I hazard he would very much disagree with.
0	hayley kiyoko is the unapologetically queer pop star we've been waiting for
1	wrapped, labeled christmas presents already stacked in grandmother's spare bedroom
0	republicans humiliate boehner, tee-up next week's national crisis
0	actor michael rapaport takes a knee, unloads on 'dumb motherf--ker' donald trump
0	a big myth about how to spot a narcissist
1	iggy pop only one allowed in grocery store shirtless
0	(still) daring to be different in dr. martens
0	jimmy fallon, judd apatow and keanu reeves perform stand-up written by kids
0	the best low-calorie mixers to use now
0	after learning about homelessness, kind toddler starts donation drive
1	department of education study finds only 30% of students adequately prepared for spring musical
1	area man's hairstyle history eerily mirrors kevin bacon's
0	the 'rain room' is coming to los angeles, not to be confused with actual rain
0	ferguson police chief: darren wilson did not know michael brown was suspect in 'strong-armed' robbery
0	marvel's top directors want lgbt superheroes to save the day
1	expiration of contract allows fergie to put on pair of pants for first time in 5 years
0	miranda lambert stuns in low-cut bridal-inspired gown
0	two very different closets: my life as the gay daughter of a u.s. spy
0	6 content marketing strategies you probably aren't trying yet
1	man takes free thing he doesn't want
0	kylie jenner channels pin-up glam in new photo from high fashion shoot
1	nutter butters 'ruined forever' for nutter butter factory worker
0	latino voters crucial to passing environmental laws: report
1	royal couple to spend $36.21 queen elizabeth had left over from 2010 u.s. visit

1

courtroom sketch artist has clear manga influences

0

fighting rages in aleppo as syrian rebels claim to break through siege

0

So atheism doesn't "need" facts? If it claims to have complete knowledge of evolution, doesn't it need all the facts? If the answer is no, then how can it argue against religion? Miller didn't explain it.

0

ian mckellen says actresses used to proposition directors for sex

1

paul ryan confident american people will warm up to tax plan once they realize life a cruel and meaningless farce

1

pool owner has bathing suit that touched his penis you can borrow

1

missing kazakhstani nukes turn up in manhattan

1

trump administration refusing to disclose names of white house diamond elite members

1

house inappropriations committee suggests nation's women dress a little sexier

0

alice waters: 'we are digesting values' when we eat

1

bangladesh runs out of people

0

tourist scams, part 3: what to know before you go

1

westminster dog show finalists form elite iditarod team

0

aarp warns of sweepstakes scams

0

Well I'm not arguing that this is adaptation...I have never said that.. What I am saying is the environment -- in this case diet is the cause for these traits to emerge in offspring.....but like I said earlier ToE does not admit that the diet or any enviornmental variable can influence traits in offspring. Traits are dictated by genes and genes are closed off from the enviornment. This is the basic dogma of Weismann's barrier. I'm not necessarily calling this evolution....I'm just simply pointing out that acquired traits can be inherited. There is no other way to describe this other than Lamarckism. Do you disagree that The inheritance of acquired characteristics is simply changes in physiology acquired over the life of an organism that are transmitted to offspring?

0

epa chief scott pruitt avoids ordinary citizens on first trip to oil-rich north dakota

1

millions of excited americans gather to watch candidates deliver series of short, elaborately rehearsed speeches

0

mysterious american flags in northern syria were planted by u.s. troops, pentagon says

1

You don't get to just say "hey i wanna be Catholic" and make it so just because you said you wanted to be.

0

Well, the first part is true but I'm not sure I understand what you are saying in the second part. Science does not claim that intelligent design is false because science lacks the tools to examine the concept. ID is just another unsupported assertion outside the domain of science (and logic for that matter). ID has reached the stage of unsupported assertion without evidence. Science has better explanations.

0

most americans think donald trump shouldn't have to sell his companies to be president

1

arab-american actually kind of enjoys always having 2 bus seats to self

1

congressman lets his guitar do the talking

1

mueller kinda miffed that barr clearly didn't read his stuff like he said he would

1

Did your mummy read you scary stories when you were littler?

0

trevor noah eviscerates donald trump's love of stop-and-frisk

0

obama honors those who made the ultimate sacrifice on memorial day 2015

0

So what this guy is saying is that he believes in natural selection but not evolution?

0

trump uses daca setback to launch new attack on court system

1

troubling study finds majority of americans who got it aren't flaunting it

0

And I'm going to correct you again. The theory of evolution is by no means an extreme view. It is the prevailing view. More than 99% of biologists accept the theory of evolution as the best explanation for the observations.

0

here's how to become kris jenner's assistant, according to kris jenner

0

boundless - today's buddha doodle

1

Hey star gazer, how do you know he didn't provide those "private sellers" also? You understand a man bent on the law is willing to go all the way. I wouldn't believe him if his tongue was notorized. Pictures? LOl

1

photojournalist spends month in oval office blind to capture images of obama in natural habitat

1

north carolina elects someone to run out for cigarettes

0

guns and georgia

1

ron paul supporter likes the way paul tells it like it has no chance of being

0

therapy golden retriever helps comfort rape victims during counseling sessions

1

weary nation says one or two more divisive issues should finish it off

0

why we should value (but not worship) reason

1

trail of ants better be leading toward something delicious

0

how nice of dr. luke to now let kesha perform at the billboard music awards

1

calm sense of impending violence returns to middle east as ceasefire brokered

0

person of interest detained after california mosque 'firebombed'

1

Hmmm, was that an ad hominem attack? You know, what you accuse others of doing? Hypocrite.

0

baltimore police begin slow process of reform in year after freddie gray's death

0

I think that what you two are doing is simply trading evidences. Saying someone is 'wrong' and directing them to a atheist web-site is not proof. You should merely be saying, 'here is an alternative argument'I say this because I can access a number of science posts that state the exact opposite of what you say, and show that they can find evidence for a flood.

1

history teacher has unusual favorite president

0

best career advice: find a need and fill it

1

thousands of onion social users burn effigies of ceo in massive show of support for company

1

philip morris ceo forces senator to dance for his amusement

1

My pursuit of happiness is denied by trees existing. Let's burn them down and destroy the environment. It's much better than me being unhappy.

1

man captures ross perot, is granted three wishes

0

5 tips for reading the polls like a pro

1

st. christopher statue embedded in motorist's forehead

0

the true cost of turning on the lights

1

matt damon mans warner brothers booth at college campus's career day

1

man reluctantly deletes video of friend trying to vault mailbox to clear data space for child's birth

0

americans respond to trump's plans for country with #nobannowall

0

profiles in courage: sometimes it's the last place you think

0

netanyahu meets with donald trump, hillary clinton ahead of first debate

0

If guns laws don't affect criminals then how do you explain the low rates of criminal gun use in nations like the UK?

0

trump and the catholic schism

0

frat suspended after 'rape some b*****s' comment caught on tape

1

report: oyster cracker–wise, nation doing pretty good

1

sellout crowd greets sellout band

1

important piece of paper tragically smudged with breadstick grease

0

after seeing a fifth-grader get bullied, this group of boys vowed to stand up for him

1

al roker strongly considers retiring from creating the weather

0

the creators of 'supergirl' know that title is a bit misogynistic

1

that knife guy from high school arrested in knife-related incident

0

taking your startup public is fraught with negatives

0

bloomberg gadfly debuts in bid to shake-up financial commentary space

0

A more precise term would be "broaden," since nothing about the definition pertaining to the people currently covered by it would be affected, "diluted" or altered in any way anyone has yet demonstrated. Nothing about the definition that pertains to people who already are, or can be married changes one iota. Their rights, benefits, and protections remain exactly the same. The only "change" would be to other people, people who have no connection to, nor impact on, the marriages of anyone else: the gays who'll marry if the legal definition is broadened to encompass them. And the only "change" in that regard will be the fact that they are encompassed by it, nothing more. No substantive aspect of the definition as it currently stands changes in the slightest.The change is not in the definition itself. It's in who it applies to.

0

"True" is not a good use of language to describe opinion. With regard to his opinion, I think he makes some good points, so I don't really need to ask him if its true. You on the other hand do need to speak to Olsen as you are claiming his letter rubbishes the concept of evolution- an opinion I hazard he would very much disagree with.

0

hayley kiyoko is the unapologetically queer pop star we've been waiting for

1

wrapped, labeled christmas presents already stacked in grandmother's spare bedroom

0

republicans humiliate boehner, tee-up next week's national crisis

0

actor michael rapaport takes a knee, unloads on 'dumb motherf--ker' donald trump

0

a big myth about how to spot a narcissist

1

iggy pop only one allowed in grocery store shirtless

0

(still) daring to be different in dr. martens

0

jimmy fallon, judd apatow and keanu reeves perform stand-up written by kids

0

the best low-calorie mixers to use now

0

after learning about homelessness, kind toddler starts donation drive

1

department of education study finds only 30% of students adequately prepared for spring musical

1

area man's hairstyle history eerily mirrors kevin bacon's

0

the 'rain room' is coming to los angeles, not to be confused with actual rain

0

ferguson police chief: darren wilson did not know michael brown was suspect in 'strong-armed' robbery

0

marvel's top directors want lgbt superheroes to save the day

1

expiration of contract allows fergie to put on pair of pants for first time in 5 years

0

miranda lambert stuns in low-cut bridal-inspired gown

0

two very different closets: my life as the gay daughter of a u.s. spy

0

6 content marketing strategies you probably aren't trying yet

1

man takes free thing he doesn't want

0

kylie jenner channels pin-up glam in new photo from high fashion shoot

1

nutter butters 'ruined forever' for nutter butter factory worker

0

latino voters crucial to passing environmental laws: report

1

royal couple to spend $36.21 queen elizabeth had left over from 2010 u.s. visit