rev_id
int64 37.7k
700M
| comment
stringlengths 5
10k
| year
int64 2k
2.02k
| logged_in
bool 2
classes | ns
stringclasses 2
values | sample
stringclasses 2
values | split
stringclasses 3
values | attack
bool 2
classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
612,311,625
|
:::::I think 'trim it back' means slash it to a third it is now - taking down a fair bit of what could be considered low note primary supported promotional details. I don't see that much unduly promo story writing here to cause such a slash of the story. Considering the size of the article and the length of time they worked together (five years) and the official wrist slap on the wife, I don't see much problem with reporting it - my only problem was with the web links - only two - and one only from web archive, no longer hosted and [the other http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/toronto/therapist-who-told-podcast-listeners-to-shun-their-families-reprimanded/article4846791/] not exactly a worldwide link - a local one only - so there is only weak support, minimal reporting of the story by other reporters , wiki doesn't want to/isn't supposed to become be the primary reporter of the story - so I am in two minds about this story and as wp:blp directs caution I am leaning towards taking the story down
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
612,312,319
|
- willing to support this User:Netoholic add to the story
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,312,528
|
Yeah Yeah my bad . Im sorry it looks a lot better I think I got confused this page with another . either way sorry about that .
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,316,206
|
:yes - just assessed the independent reporting as weak and not continued - its just not an international story is it, and not reported over any period of time - flash in the pan trivial coverage - didn't see the guardian story from 2008, that is why it stops to mention the 'reprimand' because it was written earlier, was it ever in the wiki article? -
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,328,086
|
==Edit-Warring on Camouflage articles== We are currently having an active discussion on the appropriateness of the navigation box style that you have suddenly created and imposed on two camouflage articles. In this context it is unhelpful to begin edit-warring.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
612,336,216
|
`:, I understand you are only inquiring as to whether to take the issue to a still larger forum, but I think it would be helpful to use alternative wording to ``escalate``; involved parties ought to be working to bridge the gap in perspectives between them and come to consensus and that sort of language implies antagonism and a quarrel. :, you are correct that the RfC process is not a straight up-and-down vote, but the involved editors do form a consensus on how policy, which represents broader community consensus is applied, so you can't just declare your position the non-subjective one and dismiss the majority position as mere ``personal opinion``. And frankly the stridency of your claim to having the superior argument is only continuing to highlight just how inconsistent your perspective is with community consensus on most all of the above points of conflict; we simply do not allow anywhere near the level of archiving of documentation on the behalf of other projects such as you want to utilize this space for. We strive for encyclopedic tone here, and part of that is summary style, which requires us to include only content reaching a certain notability and only consistent with it's weight in sources. Which brings us the the larger issue; we can't even begin to appropriately weight content from our WP:Reliable sources because we have none here. Frankly this article is a candidate for AfD as stands, as it doesn't have sourcing sufficient to pass WP:GNG, let alone the more specific standards for notability with regard to software. :More than dozen central policies and guidelines have been cited to you above, none of which you have responded to substantively, and yet you are glib enough to brand your opposition (who are in the majority and consist of vastly more experienced editors with a much lower personal stake in the content than seems to be the case for yourself) as the ones who are allowing their personal feelings take precedence over policy. It's often perfectly useful to combine your love and advocacy for another project with Wikipedia editing, providing you are still acting as a Wikipedia first and foremost when contributing here. But the level of documentation and promotion you want to add to the present article serves the interest of the software's project at the cost of ignoring the content standards of this project. Wikipedia is not an appropriate place to host detailed documentation or manuals of usage; we present well-rounded information on encyclopedic topics with established verifiability and notability. None of those standards are being served by keeping an ``article`` that looks like it is straight out of a support page, and not supported by a single source that is non-primary and consistent with Wikipedia's standards on sourcing. Again, I stress to you your luck, given your degree of devotion to this content, that different parties didn't arrive here who would simply decide to remove this article in it's entirely for completely failing GNG. I assure you, without new and significantly more robust sourcing establishing notability, this article can;t survive and AfD, so you really should start working with the editors trying to salvage this situation while you still have the benefit of their help in this regard. :I find 's interpretation of the emergent consensus as closest to the reality of the situation, but regardless, this is a case where, even though the majority position seems evident, it would be best to have an administrator close the discussion and we can move on from there. `
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
612,345,627
|
I will make another compromise with you I will agree to allow the formats back if you allow me to add them and the catalog numbers individually so I can fill in any missing ones.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
612,346,419
|
Yes that's what I mean, can I ask you a question were is the best site or place to get catalog numbers from (I don't have the cds at hand) I need the catalog numbers for Thirteen and Super Collider and the latest 3 live albums, I will also add in the formats.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,346,954
|
Okay thanks, one more question (sorry to bombard you with questions all of a sudden) I'm going to add the formats what short title do you think should be added for digital download (Compact Disc = CD).
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
612,347,283
|
What do you mean where did the albums formats disappear?
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,347,873
|
Oh I seem I am adding them back in 1 by 1 like I did with the catalogue numbers so I can add any missing ones.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,357,821
|
::Are you sure that's not the Tunceli district? It seems like that site is only for the Tunceli district. It is only the Tunceli Province's name that has been changed.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
612,375,947
|
` == Wikipedia is not for writing about yourself == Welcome to Wikipedia, but it is not a place like LinkedIn or Facebook for people to write about themselves. It is a different sort of site, a project to build an encyclopedia, so it is selective about subjects for articles, and writing about oneself is strongly discouraged, for reasons explained at Wikipedia is not about YOU and Wikipedia:Autobiography. Wikipedia user pages are not like those at social-networking sites. Their use is explained at WP:NOTWEBHOST: ``Wikipedians have their own user pages, but they should be used primarily to present information relevant to working on the encyclopedia. Limited biographical information is allowed, but user pages should not function as personal webpages or be repositories for large amounts of material that is irrelevant to collaborating on Wikipedia. If you are looking to make a personal webpage or blog or to post your résumé, please make use of one of the many free providers on the Internet or any hosting included with your Internet account.`` You can find out more about Wikipedia at the WP:Welcome page and the WP:Introduction.`
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
612,388,356
|
What the hell do you mean what was I doing here, sorry I forgot YOU OWN Wikipedia for someone who likes to be a bossy little runt, you should dont seem to know many rules. *1- Wikipedia:Ownership of articles *2- Wikipedia:I just don't like it
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
612,389,065
|
Look at your own fucking speech before you criticise others you stupid idiot, you are a bully, you think you own the Megadeth discography page and revert anything you don't agree with. I gave in to you regarding the formats and label numbers but I won't over this.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
612,389,289
|
You can't comment on how much has been removed endless you know what and why.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,390,132
|
This user is a fucking bully, who bully's people an owns articles. I gave in on the discussion regarding the numbers and formats on the page why should I this time, rich please see my point I don't want this aggro.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
612,391,870
|
Retrohead as just spend 10 minutes getting a load of discography pages I have edited together and posted them on my user page,, look Ritchie I know you don't want to get involved and you are busy with your own edits and stuff but I beg you please help me to sort this stuff out I have never dealt with anyone so awkward as him before.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
612,395,456
|
I am demanding to speak to someone of the highest authority, anyone who has a proper look at this history will see that I tried to solve the matter via discussion, gave in to the other editor on other things, the other editor has been personal attacking, page owning, edit warring, not assuming good faith and yet he has not been blocked speak to Ritchie333 he is an editor who has been trying to solve the problem out all day and he will tell you fairly, he has the right to comment as he was involved from an outside point of view.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
612,396,238
|
I have been blocked for 2 instances of losing my cool and no other look at anything has taken, place you have not looked at the things he said calling me uneducated a troll, you have just took a quick look at the comments and blocked me without investigating further.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,397,496
|
and it haven't been blocked twice this week already as one of the admins said and the other time I was blocked along with the other user.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,401,854
|
::::Yeah, but, again, that would explain you moving it to the 'unspecified' section, not deleting it entirely. Just leave it where it is in the future if you don't know what to do with it, and I'll sort it out. -
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
612,404,937
|
That wasn't a personal attack, it was stating facts. Perhaps go read the Theresa Donovan talk page for yourself. What I said is the truth and can be verified.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,405,225
|
SAME FOR THIS
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,405,551
|
Or don't. It's up to you. I will be back, though. And I greatly look forward to it.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
612,407,014
|
==Blocked for continuing disruptive behaviour and battleground tendencies== Despite constant warnings by myself and other editors for you to assume good faith and to stop making unhelpful accusations, you have constantly ignored our advice and continued to make bad faith accusations against other editors, in violation of . You have been given numerous warnings telling you that your behaviour was unacceptable yet you have completely ignored them with this edit. I have given you multiple chances, multiple opportunities to reflect on your behaviour and have told you many times that it is utterly unacceptable.Therefore you are blocked for 48 hours for disruptive editing and for exhibiting battleground behaviour in violation of our no personal attack policy. — That wasn't a personal attack, it was stating facts. Perhaps go read the Theresa Donovan talk page for yourself. What I said is the truth and can be verified. Or don't. It's up to you. I will be back, though. And I greatly look forward to it.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,407,950
|
` So, to clarify, ... THIS is rude to you: ``To clarify, it's not just the infobox livelikemusic wants them omitted from. They're not currently mentioned in the body of the article and livelikemusic wants it to stay that way as well as having them removed from the infobox. In essence, livelikemusic wants them to not exist. Please see her comments on the Theresa Donovan talk page.Cebr1979 (talk) `` 'Cause... actually, there's nothing rude about it. It's stating facts. The info is not in the body of the page nor does she want it to be, and she does all want it removed from the infobox. She does want them to not exist and her comments on the Theresa Donovan talk page explicitly state that. Odd you would allow her to run to you (as an admin) without notifying me (as the rules for contacting an admin should, in theory, be the same as contacting submitting a complaint to ANI). Also odd you wouldn't bother to look into it before acting. `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
612,409,275
|
::I'll just wait. I've already got a list of edits that will only help to make multiple soap pages much, much better. Thank you for your time, .
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
612,417,295
|
` == A barnstar for you == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` | The Original Barnstar |- |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | For your much appreciated and diligent work on the 2014 Isla Vista killings article...Thanks! Keep up the good work! |}`
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
612,418,923
|
== Whatever happened to Judas Devlin?== I see he's no longer on the list, did a source emerge to announce his release? If so he's not on the WWE Alumni list either. Just curious if he fell through the cracks?
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,449,863
|
== Input on image decision == Hi you are invited to vote for the image to be used on the LG G2 infobox page at Talk:LG G2. Thanks!
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
612,456,041
|
:I thought you were adding them. I'll revisit my edit. Sorry if I was incorrect. I agree with what you've said here.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,473,865
|
` ::Thanks for the reply – I've given up on most WikiProject pages, as very few of them seem to be active (WikiProject Albums seems to be one of the few exceptions) which is why I prefer to go straight to editors who seem to be actively engaged on a particular article. The chart dates have always been recorded as the w/e Saturday: this made sense in the days before Sunday trading and 24 hour internet download availability, as there was a natural cut-off point for tabulating the week's sales after the shops had closed on Saturday afternoon, and this has been continued into the digital era. As for independent sources, the official chart books have always used this Saturday date – look at any copy of the Guinness Book of British Hit Singles & Albums or its replacement The Virgin Book of British Hit Singles and you'll see that all dates in the books, whether referring to chart entry, date reaching no. 1, etc. are w/e Saturdays, hence my wish to keep to this format. I don't mind if Hadji87 wants to keep doing his summaries, but if he's going to continue using ``incorrect`` dates and not cite his sources it's going to be a pain to keep correcting them. Your suggestions make good sense – I think I will do as you say and pick an article from a previous year and work on it in my sandbox, and also ask Deb for her opinions. Cheers. `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
612,474,859
|
` Always good to have the ignorant and mentally defective getting together. Die soon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Your sick in the head I mean really sick.`
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
612,481,398
|
`:You can return to the FAC anytime you want, but two personal questions: is there any formal alternative for ``big-shot don``? and at least how many ``support`` tags are needed for a FAC to be promoted? `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
612,485,878
|
` == Pie in the face == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | I just wanted to take a moment to recognize you for your contributions to WIkipedia. Rarely has any editor done more damage not only to the reputation of the project but to the morale and detriment of all. This pie is for you and may the fleas of a thousand camels infest your armpits! |}`
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
612,486,854
|
` == A pie at you! == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | For using the admin tools to get your way on Wikipedia and abuse editors who are unable to defend themselves I throw this pie at you. The plate is aluminum so when your done cleaning pie off your face you can wear the pie plate like a crown while you act like the Queen of Wikipedia. |}`
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
612,493,779
|
== Charles Pinney? == Hi Ironholds, hope you are well. Thanks for your support to add William Sharp McKechnie and William Davy (lawyer)! Do you think Charles Pinney (see DNB00 entry) is worthy? He was the Mayor of Bristol, and tried for failure to act in the Bristol Riots of 1831. An interesting record exists in State Trials (New Series) vol 3. Cheers!
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,494,934
|
== Habeas Corpus Act 1816 == Hi again Ironholds. Sorry to add to your workload, but do you think you might add a wiki for the Habeas Corpus Act 1816? See here. As I understand it, the measure prevented penal ships and extraterritoriality such as that later used by the Americans in Guantanamo Bay. Thanks much.
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,520,414
|
(UTC) | page2 = Dance Moms (season 2) | diff2 = https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Dance_Moms_episodes&diff;=612517001&oldid;=612514854 | date2 = 11 June 2014 at 16:25
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
612,526,039
|
== Username == Your username seems to indicate to me that you represent an NJ Ad(vertising) Agency. Please see WP:Conflict of Interest and WP:CORPNAME.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
612,531,204
|
You really don't score well on the social graces scale do you? Good luck with being so bloody I'll mannered. So, if it's irrelevant to you then perhaps you will refer me to somebody to whom maintaining the reliability of Wikipedia entries is not irrelevant?
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
612,548,380
|
Racist ignorant and fascist all in all disgusting boy
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
612,550,409
|
` == Robert Plant's Romani roots? == I see that there are some information about Plant having some Romani roots. As far as I know, however, Plant said ``my mother was a gypsy``, where ``gypsy`` could've meant ``a traveller`` or a ``a hippie`` - in terms of a lifestyle, not ethnicity. He could've meant some Itinerant groups in Europe like for instance the Irish Travellers or maybe some Scottish Gypsy and Traveller groups. I know Robert Plant is from the UK, and I've heard that British people usually don't use the word ``gypsy`` when speaking about Romani people, but they use it when speaking about people who lead itinerant life. Any conformation that Plant used it in terms of his Romani ethnic origin? `
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,581,287
|
::You also dont understand what fringe means if you think that being peerreviewed means it is not fringe. NO one cites him. Noone uses his work or his classifications. That is fringe. Now please leave my talkpage.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
612,598,440
|
I am a PR team and a lair and SAS81 stinks too HA HA
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
612,598,737
|
I told lies By SAS81
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,604,370
|
:No, I haven't. Thanks for asking.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
612,607,251
|
Listen, you better quit your non-sense. It is obvious as to who you are, and I will be more than happy to report you to the administrators again. PacificWarrior101
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
612,609,418
|
i hate you for deleting my stuff im going to hunt you down and slice you up and cook you for my baby ) have a nice day hun
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
612,610,465
|
== Birthday == According to his latest tweets, his birthday listed on Wikipedia is incorrect. https://twitter.com/richardayoade/status/477013679251394560 https://twitter.com/richardayoade/status/477013962383699968
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
612,615,344
|
even if it's a governmet source. Actually government sources are generally not used on Wikipedia
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,623,459
|
You re fuck of bitch...
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
612,630,504
|
All enjoyed by Stumbahnfuhrer Garage . as corrupt as you get. I am not Welsh, nor do I live in Wales. Like reasonable people I don't like racists and neo Nazis like yourself who appear crushingly ignorant of European history and the UK legal system. I, as a former solicitor in the legal aid area, do not suffer such blind ignorance. You make all fair minded people feel sick.
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,632,062
|
== Fuck of == You fuck of...
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
612,632,799
|
Commons nudity (category header)
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,644,015
|
::::Director, you don't have to sound so WP:OWNY, because I agree (for once), Christ, this is a stupid fucking argument. Morbidly curious about how Balkan editing worked I decided to take a peek. Jeeee-zus! No wonder everyone gets so batshit. This could simply be solved by finding a few books that make reference to this particular region in Croatia during this time period using (or not using) this format. Asdisis, I do agree this is a question of style and you do need to show this is not the convention stylistically. Also, have some sympathy for the reader, who is probably coming to this article because he/she wants some quick, digestible answers. A convoluted description of the location is likely to baffle and alienate .
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
612,645,199
|
```Arrests and Charges`` section misleads, as the sequential order of events is misrepresented. A complete rewrite of this section is imperative. We didn't know the identities of the defendants on 4 June, as the wiki would seem to indicated. `
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
612,645,588
|
` == proper titles needed == Chris Grayling is not ``justice secretary``. The ``reaction`` section should be rewritten in chronological order. `
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,648,516
|
UTC) :::::::Well that will teach me to notice that Director may actually be right about something. Silly me.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,656,525
|
Anyone who writes the filth you write is, by definition, an ignorant racist neo Nazi.
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
612,666,888
|
, while avoiding the problems described above
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
612,668,346
|
`I don't object to its inclusion IF better sources are found. Also, Faustian, reverts or not, slow down and make the changes once there is a consensus. There's no rush. `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
612,677,017
|
Here is how the major biographies of Tesla have characterized his place of origin. | Tesla: Inventor of the Electrical Age W. Bernard Carlson Princeton University Press, May 7, 2013 p.13 Nikola Tesla was born in 1856 in Smiljan in the province of Lika in what is today Croatia. At that time, Croatia was the military frontier district of Austro-Hungarian Empire and the area sometimes referred to as Krajina. • Smiljan, Austrian Empire (Modern Day Croatia) • Smiljan, Croatian Military Frontier, Austrian Empire • Smiljan, Croatian Military Frontier, Austrian Empire (modern-day Croatia) | Tesla: Man Out of Time Margaret Cheney Simon and Schuster, Oct 2, 2001 p. 25 Nikola Tesla was born at precisely midnight between July 9 and 10, 1856, in the village of Smiljan, province of Lika, Croatia, between Yugoslavia’s Velebit Mountains and the eastern shore of the Adriatic Sea. • Smiljan, Croatian | Wizard: The Life And Times Of Nikola Tesla Marc J. Seifer Citadel Press, May 1, 1998 p. 1 It was during a crackling summer storm in Smiljan, a small hamlet at the back edge of a plateau set high in the mountains, when Nikola Tesla was born. The Serbian family resided in the province of Lika, a plateau and gentle river valley in Croatia where wild boar and deer still dwell…. … In the early 1800s, having been briefly part of Napoleon’s Illyrian provinces, Croatia was now a domain of Austria-Hungary. With its neighboring Slavic countries of Bosnia, Herzegovina, Montenegro, Serbia, an Slovenia, Croatia was sandwiched between the ruling Hapsburg dynasty to the north and the Ottoman Empire to the south. • Smiljan, Croatian • Smiljan, Austrian Empire (Modern Day Croatia) • Smiljan, Croatian Military Frontier, Austrian Empire • Smiljan, Croatian Military Frontier, Austrian Empire (modern-day Croatia) | Nikola Tesla: A Spark of Genius Carol Dommermuth-Costa Twenty-First Century Books, 1994 p.11 Nikola Tesla was born at midnight between July 9 and 10, 1856, in Smiljan, a small village in Croatia. • Smiljan, Croatian Prodigal Genius: The Life of Nikola Tesla James O’Neill Ives Washburn, 1944 p. 11 There was no evidence whatever that a superman ws being born when the stroke of midnight between July 9 and 10 in the year 1856, brought a son, Nikola, to the home of the Rev. Milutin Teslan and Djouka, his wife, in the hamlet of Smiljan, I the Austro-Hungarian border province of Lika, now a part of Yugoslavia. • Smiljan, Austrian Empire (Modern Day Croatia) • Smiljan, Croatian Military Frontier, Austrian Empire • Smiljan, Croatian Military Frontier, Austrian Empire (modern-day Croatia) | The Inventions, Researches and Writings of Nikola Tesla The inventions, researches, and writings of Nikola Tesla Thomas C. Martin, Nikola Tesla Health Research Books, Nov 1, 1894 p. 3 • Nikola Tesla was born in 1857 at Smiljan, Lika, a borderland region of Austro-Hungary, of the Serbian race. Which as maintained against Turkey and all comer so unceasing a struggle for freedom • Smiljan, Austrian Empire (Modern Day Croatia) • Smiljan, Croatian Military Frontier, Austrian Empire • Smiljan, Croatian Military Frontier, Austrian Empire (modern-day Croatia) There just isn't consensus among Tesla's biographers for this, and I strongly suggest tha
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,683,889
|
== Cesc Fabregas == You're a fucking idiot. Cesc Fabregas signed for Chelsea today you moron. It's been confirmed by both Barcelona and Chelsea. The transfer window for England opened on June 10th, not July 1st, get your facts straight. There's even pictures of him holding a Chelsea jersey. Get your facts right, Fabregas is officially a Chelsea player now you fucking retard.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
612,684,831
|
` == Cesc Fabregas == The English transfer window opened on June 10th, not July 1st as you so wrongly stated. Therefore the transfer is officially valid. Fabregas himself confirmed the transfer by stating ``Wenger turned me down, so I've joined Chelsea to win some trophies`` all parties have confirmed the deal. I really don't understand why you're being so stubborn about this. Everybody has confirmed he's joining Chelsea and the English transfer window has already opened.`
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
612,687,018
|
== Transfer Window == The English transfer window opened on June 10th, that is a fact. And I see this Walter guy hasn't replied to my latest comment. He knows I'm right and just doesn't want to admit it.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,697,291
|
::So now we are resorting to calling King David a bandit, are we? That description actually more aptly fits Mohammed, who looted Mecca and massacred its Jewish population.
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,707,313
|
==Photo needed== Anybody reading this, if you have a photo of this group, please write something here, thanks.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
612,711,112
|
I have reverted your further edit to History of Malaysia because it is a non-English phrase that is not explained. Please use edit summaries and refrain from any nonconstructive edits. Thank you.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
612,720,708
|
The reference is to an article published on 4 June.
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,722,187
|
` == style of cause == You ought to be very careful of renaming the case ``R v Ab and CD`` to ``R v Incedal...``. The case is named in the transcript (you?) provided ``Guardian v AB CD``, and is likely to be filed under ``R v AB and CD`` for good, even tho its defendants are now known. The identity of the defendants is less important than the continuity of reference. You probably need to change the first sentence and the wiki title back to ``R v AB CD`` for reference sake. `
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
612,722,382
|
you need to be more careful about your references. the reference you gave for Grayling quote was 12 june; in fact it was 5 june, fixed.
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,726,324
|
::so no Magdalene Sisters? Thank you for the clarification. You might want to remove Agnes of God from this list, if I recall it correctly.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
612,729,724
|
` *: *: Are you fing kidding me? There are 30+ reliable sources listed in the pre-vandalism history of the page. This debate in this talk page has no importance and will not receive justice. I am making my objections public for the sake of posterity alone. If you want to see the sources: # Go look at the history of the page pre-vandalism. # Go look at the history of the talk page pre-vandalism. # Go look at the previous AfD discussion where 30+ sources are extensively discussed and analyzed, and consensus found that they were reliable according to the wikipedia definition of ``reliable`` which you have not familiarized yourself with. *This debate has already been done and it's very visible in the history of the page and the previous AfDs; the history which has not been consulted by the current deleters attacking this page. Without an ``admin in my pocket`` my claims fall on deaf ears; I understand this all too well. If you or your allies were interested in due process, you would examine the history instead of asking that all that labour be repeated. Your kind will always demand that others do all the work even when it has been done in exhaustive detail. When you've read this entire page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Law_of_One then you may speak without embarassing yourself. Anyone who has not read that entire page and understood the poles of the debate speaks from ignorance and exposes themselves as lazy deleters happy to erase hours and hours of work without a care. Shame on all of you for your intellectual laziness, dishonesty, and irresponsible deleter reflexes. === Screenshot of the Sources Pre-Vandalism === — Preceding unsigned comment added by • `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
612,730,911
|
` == Vandalism == It seems you're great at calling others ``vandals``, but when you're told something you don't wanna hear, you act exactly that way and vandalistically erase the message. :And not to be unfair: I haven't seen you calling others vandals, but you responded to a disgruntled in a somewhat condescending manner and didn't do anything about his request being vandalistically erased under the pretense of vandalism. Just to keep up with the truth etc.pp.- `
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,734,820
|
Bionite's fundamental property is a cell membrane adhesion receptor involved in morphogenesis, integrity and structural rebuilding within nano scale organizations. It was first discovered on earth in the mid 20th. century within meteor deposits. http://media.indiedb.com/images/members/1/486/485164/Up_Close.jpg http://media.indiedb.com/cache/images/members/1/486/485164/thumb_620x2000/Bioposter.png
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
612,736,896
|
:::::When I said person does not always have what he wishes on Wikipedia I wasn't intimidating you. I was just telling you it's not necessary that our edits will be accepted by the others and everything I said was in good faith. Ayyappa is mostly worshiped in Tamil Nadu and Kerala not other regions. I too didn't want Ashoksundari article to be created since I thought she was a work of fiction. I started edit warring over it which I accept was wrong on my part. But that was in the past so you should stop trying to say yo someone that they have been blocked especially when there comments and edits are in good faith. Now I ask you Eshwar.om do you have any proof that Ayyappa exists in the majority of Hindu scriptures like Kartikeya and Ganesha or any Sanskritic scripture?
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,737,152
|
worshipped by North Indians
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,739,177
|
` : I have looked at the article as it stands today, and I have resubmitted it in your name and accepted it. Forgive me, I do not have the time today to look at the links above. I am not sure if you have included them in the article or not. If you can improve the article please do so. Just remember that it is now in the wild, on its own, and you should father it, not mother it `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
612,739,353
|
== I hate you. == I hate you. I hate you!
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
612,741,982
|
` == I hate you. == I hate you. I hate you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by `
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,744,103
|
You don't and yet while you ask that others o prove their statement with proof you yourself are not providing any proof for your statement. It is disappointing that while you much are more experienced you are resorting to such double standards.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,754,770
|
and/or the change in physical appearance is of significant commentary
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
612,773,641
|
, 13 June 2014 (UTC) I have requested the name change and stated the reason why. Hopefully I have done this correctly. Thank you for the advise and help.Brian Kennedy 14:40
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
612,785,817
|
` * In of itself, the word 'narrow' may describe one person's perception, but the percentages reveal a different story. One would or would not argue that it was a 'landslide' victory in the opposite direction and modifiers such as this tend to exacerbate bias and interpretation of whether the candidate is successful. For instance, I injected the modifier, on purpose, with another candidate, ``only x% votes`` to determine if there are any biases invoked/tolerated for other candidates using these simple words. And almost instantly, the use of the word ``only`` was removed. In this way, I find that editors here do understand the nuances of these words.`
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
612,788,378
|
I think the questionable links arte important for explaining, where the person has been during the war, which the items concerned.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
612,795,479
|
` **** It actually doesn't matter how good the information itself is, because even good information on Wikipedia cannot be trusted and therefore is not helpful. Anyway, it's well known that science coverage is better than humanities. The problem with situation like this is that you have people who seen to operate from a scientific mindset editing articles that have to do with literature, theology, culture, and philosophy. Most wikipedia admins mis-apply scientific concepts and criteria and methods to articles that are not subject to those methods. For instance, you constantly see idiotic admins asking for ``reliable`` ``empirical`` sources for a claim about literature, or asking for ``reliable`` ``unbiased`` citations for some postmodern topic. Hahaha. Anyway for philosophy at least we have the stanford encyclopedia. Right now the best compendium of information for information about the contents of books is on Amazon. Too bad that a greedy corporation gets to own and capitalize on all that free information. Wikipedia can't handle that stuff because any books that aren't the taste of these Richard Dawkinite Asperberger I-Fucking-Love-Science types get deleted. Like the Law of One article. Some pointy headed basement nerd decides he doesn't like those books so they should be deleted. Nevermind that they meet all the wikipedia requirements... what counts is that the admin thinks the books are ``nonsense`` and that the 30+ notable and reliable sources are ``biased``. And you can't get justice because there are way more dumb admins than good ones, and what kind of person would volunteer for such a terrible job anyway? The only people who become admins are power tripping losers with small man syndrome, because those are the only kind of people who benefit from the job. They don't follow the rules as laid out in wikipedia guidelines and there is no court or system to keep them accountable. The admin rot goes all the way to the top, and admins will never justify their rulings according to policy. It's like having a legal system where judges are not required to explain a ruling in legal terms. They just hand out the ruling without explaining how the ruling follows from law, and then they cry about it when people point out that there is no logical way to get from the written laws to the stupid ruling they made. They cry harassment. They delete your criticisms from their page. They delete the evidence you present. You claim this asshole is competent; why did he selectively delete the evidence I presented on his talk page? He deleted the EVIDENCE. That's not incompetence, that's malicious, that's psychopathic. Anyway now that this last article of mine is finally dead I can move on. I'd have to be an idiot to put any more of my work at the mercy of capricious, vindictive, arbitrary petty tyrants like that guy. `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,796,913
|
` === Drmies, the Irresponsible Hacksaw Deletionist, and the screenshot he doesn't want you to see === The following was selectively deleted by Drmies *: *: *: *: *: Are you fing kidding me? There are 30+ reliable sources listed in the pre-vandalism history of the page. This debate in this talk page has no importance and will not receive justice. I am making my objections public for the sake of posterity alone. If you want to see the sources: # Go look at the history of the page pre-vandalism. # Go look at the history of the talk page pre-vandalism. # Go look at the previous AfD discussion where 30+ sources are extensively discussed and analyzed, and consensus found that they were reliable according to the wikipedia definition of ``reliable`` which you have not familiarized yourself with. This debate has already been done and it's very visible in the history of the page and the previous AfDs; the history which has not been consulted by the current deleters attacking this page. Without an ``admin in my pocket`` my claims fall on deaf ears; I understand this all too well. If you or your allies were interested in due process, you would examine the history instead of asking that all that labour be repeated. Your kind will always demand that others do all the work even when it has been done in exhaustive detail. When you've read this entire page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Law_of_One then you may speak without embarassing yourself. Anyone who has not read that entire page and understood the poles of the debate speaks from ignorance and exposes themselves as lazy deleters happy to erase hours and hours of work without a care. Shame on all of you for your intellectual laziness, dishonesty, and irresponsible deleter reflexes. === Screenshot of the Sources Pre-Vandalism === — Preceding unsigned comment added by • `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
612,798,618
|
` == Heterogeneous System Architecture == Support for ARM big.LITTLE with either In-kernel switcher (CPU migration) or Heterogeneous multi-processing (global task scheduling) is missing. Other possible HSA-features are missing. E.g. the ARM Cortex-A15 features stuff, that elder CPUs do not. More documentation on that would be nice. `
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,800,594
|
All right, if you thought this is warranted supplementary material, I could link it, for pedagogy.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
612,803,709
|
` ::Thanks for all the hard work, award or not. I started Wikipedia Editor Retention two years ago with no clear idea of what the project should look like, but I had a lot of faith in the people around me that we could at least do something. Most of what we do never is seen by anyone and doesn't make the pages on the Project. The Editor of the Week program is one of the more visible efforts. In my opinion, the greatest thing to come from the program isn't the individual awards, but it fosters the idea that we should treat everyone with ``thanks`` every day, in all they do. Just as with the entire project, the goal is simply to create greater awareness and appreciation in general, especially for those that work in their own corner of the Wiki, avoiding the spotlight, and doing good things simply because they want to do good things. We will never be able to thank everyone that deserves it, but maybe we can plant seeds to make us all a bit more tolerant, a bit more thankful. | | WER `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
612,803,977
|
` : I agree that SIMBAD is a good source, but there are, of course, other sources. None amounts to an Académie française for common names. I agree that a book introducing a name is not prima facie evidence for the name's currency. Stephen O'Meara's books, for example, routinely introduce his own names, many of which have not caught on. But there is no set time period for common usage: a name can go viral practically overnight. A simple Google search indicates that ``the Southern Beehive`` is fairly current for this cluster; it's harder to make a similar case for ``the Sprinter``, though ``the Running Man Cluster`` does appear in the NGC Project. More references would help. But characterizing a name as bogus or fictitious or fraudulent is not particularly helpful; what matters is whether the name (however coined) has currency. `
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
612,810,167
|
` ==This article is embarrassing== It sounds like she wrote it herself. Wiki doesn't put what the person ``thinks`` and little emotional stories in factual articles.`
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
612,810,697
|
` ::::You are an atrocious liar, Bob Rayner. If I wrote in the value-form article I created that ``Thus, Marx aims to provide a brief morphology of the category of economic value as such, from the simplest forms to the money-form.`` that is perfectly accurate and neutral. Because that is in fact what it is. It is not controversial at all. By contrast, your arbitrary vandalism of other's texts has nothing to do with accuracy and neutrality, but with your own perceptions, biases and prejudices what is acceptable or preferable. You are fighting your own propaganda war in wikipedia, as shown exactly by what you deleted and added across time. That's bad, but what makes it worse is two things: the evidence is that you frequently have no real experience or competency with regard to the subjectmatter, and you provide no satisfactory explanations or discussions for cutting out very large parts of texts from articles written by others. I am therefore going to launch an arbitration procedure against you as soon as I get some time. Your highly objectionable political vendetta in wikipedia, disguised as ``editing`` ought to stop forthwith. `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
612,823,406
|
June 2014 (UTC) == June 2014 == and his ally continue to abuse their admin privileges, attemtping to delete and erase all criticisms of their gross incompetence. 22:55, 13
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,823,617
|
:::I understood it to be a term of art, not a literal enunciation of a belief that a disembodied deity had possessed the bodies of humans in eastern Virginia at the polling booth. Such a notion would be inconsistent with Brat's free will theology and none of the RS that includes this quote have indicated he meant it as anything more than a literary flourish. If they were unambiguous he intended to communicate he was in contact with God or some other super-being then we'd have something. But they didn't. Right now we're making a scrapbook, rather than an encyclopedia article.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
612,826,778
|
` ::From April 2014, Barack Obama declared ``And none of us are free from sin, but we look to His life and strive, knowing that “if we love one another, God lives in us, and His love is perfected in us.” [] ... the President of the USA is stating that a magic super-being is possessing human bodies. That sounds exactly like what Brat said; every bit as unhinged and every bit as trivial. `
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
612,835,922
|
== YOUNG BOY INC == First, I am an AUTHORIZED representative of YOUNG BOYS INC
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
612,860,438
|
= On Microelectromechanical systems = You really wasted your time. That top section is an overkill and will be deleted by someone else in the future, if not sooner. I'm not wasting my time reverting it. -Good Luck
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.