dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
613,502,568	` ==BI, you said you wanted to talk== At the bottom of the lead section you have written: ``Its promoter speculated in 1994 that the skyhook concept could be cost competitive with what is realistically thought to be achievable using a space elevator, but the skyhook is not competitive with other rotating tether concepts. In addition, the rotating skyhook is in fact deemed ``not engineeringly feasible using presently available materials``.`` Regarding: In addition, the rotating skyhook is in fact deemed ``not engineeringly feasible using presently available materials`` That statement appears to come from Ref [3] on page 10. The full quote is ``If the mass of the tether alone started to exceed 200 times the mass of the payload, then that was an indication the particular scenario being considered was not engineeringly feasible using presently available materials, although the application might become feasible in the near future as better materials become available with higher tensile strengths at higher operational temperatures.`` It then goes on to say ``As we shall see, presently available commercial materials will suffice to make the HASTOL tethers needed. The primary message we want to leave with the Reader is: “We don't need magic materials like ‘Buckminster-Fuller-carbon-nanotubes’ to make the space tether facility for a HASTOL system. Existing materials will do.”`` So it would appear that you misread your reference. The tether mass of 200 times mass of the payload mass is the upper limit to the problem. Systems where the tether mass is less than 200 times the payload mass can be built with ``presently available commercial materials.`` To further reinforce this the Conclusion to the report states ``The fundamental conclusion of the Phase I HASTOL study effort is that the concept is technically feasible. We have evaluated a number of alternate system configurations that will allow hypersonic air-breathing vehicle technologies to be combined with orbiting, spinning space tether technologies to provide a method of moving payloads from the surface of the Earth into Earth orbit. For more than one HASTOL architecture concept, we have developed a design solution using existing, or near-term technologies. We expect that a number of the other HASTOL architecture concepts will prove similarly technically feasible when subjected to detailed design studies. The systems are completely reusable and have the potential of drastically reducing the cost of Earth-to-orbit space access.`` Regarding: ``but the skyhook is not competitive with other rotating tether concepts.`` and ``A 2000 Boeing report on the possibillity of combining skyhooks with hypersonic planes concluded that ``In general, the non-spinning tether HyperSkyhook concept does not look competitive with the spinning tether concepts.``.`` The full quote is: ``HyperSkyhook In 1995 Zubrin proposed the “Hypersonic Skyhook” as a solution to the mismatch between the attainable atmospheric speeds of a hypersonic airplane and the orbital speeds of space tethers. Since the orbital speed of the space tether decreases with increasing altitu	2,014	false	article	blocked	test	false
613,513,358	Yeah, I know QoS is the movie. I want to know where the talk page for Quantum of Solace is. I can't find it on the article. - 11:22 PM, 18 June, 2014	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
613,525,838	\|action2result=promoted \|ftname=Looking Glass Studios video games \|topic=Video games \|currentstatus=GA	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
613,526,410	` ::: I will keep your very objective and useful comments in mind. Anything of substance? `	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
613,526,591	`:: If it is possible, yes, I promise. `	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
613,528,142	` == Gallium3D == Hi, I think I managed to transform Gallium3D into an article that is good. See your comment here: Talk:Gallium3D#This article sucks. Any further suggestions? `	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
613,528,480	` : Intel seem to disagree with you. They rather write their driver the old way, and do not loose 5-10% of computing power. For people who would like to use Linux as a gaming platform, 5-10% loss in performance due to (avoidable?) layers of abstraction (i.e. John D. Carmack's ``layers of crap``) is quite much. The claim, that Gallium3D could cost maybe 5-10% of performance is from some VMware employee, in some Video I once watched on YouTube. `	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
613,528,851	` :: VMware does virtualization. So, it is relevant for any platform. Developers of Free and open-source graphics device drivers/Mesa 3D make use of it, since it lessens their burden to develop device drivers. But e.g. Intel, still programs their Linux driver the old way, most probably because the Gallium3D drivers introduce a performance penalty (and maybe also, because improvements in Mesa3D directly benefit the device drivers for the competition). `	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
613,532,513	` :::This also needs doing in the body (currently under ``Media and culture`` but may be worth moving to ``History``) `	2,014	true	article	random	test	false
613,535,201	` == software license & supported platforms == The article in its current form, concentrates only on the software license of the game engines. It says little to nothing about the supported platforms/operating systems. `	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
613,538,068	== pleasure stop edit == I hate you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	true
613,538,287	I hate you? I hate you!	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	true
613,543,332	== Input needed at genre discussion == Hey there, could you give your input for the addition of alternative metal to the infobox at The Hunting Party? There's been disputes over genres lately, so I'm trying to establish a consensus for alternative metal to be listed alongside the current genres (hard rock and rap rock). Here is the thread for the poll: Talk:The Hunting Party (album)#Genre Poll	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
613,554,887	` == Shut up loser == {\| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` \|rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` \| \|style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` \| Best in Awfulness \|- \|style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` \| I dont care about you and what you do. Dyou know how to MYOB? Oh! It's mind your own business! \|}`	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	true
613,555,360	` == Mind your own business == {\| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` \|rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` \| \|style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` \| Mind your own business \|- \|style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` \| Read between the lines dearie <3 \|}`	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
613,562,423	`Merging the article ``War crimes in occupied Poland during World War II`` with the article ``Occupation of Poland (1939–45)`` is meaningless and would lead to a lot of confusion in the future. Why? Mostly because as we speak of Poland occupied by German Nazis we think about the territory and its history, while war crimes in occupied Poland could be a way to omit some historical facts, when focusing only on Nazi crimes, without mentioning the whole the history of German occupation of Poland. Facts shall not be omitted. My opinion is NOT, the articles should not be merged. Regards. `	2,014	true	article	blocked	test	false
613,580,902	_____________________________________________________________________________ How do we come to a consensus when you don't say anything here and I have shown that you have misquoted a reference? So you going to lock me out of the article again?	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
613,581,699	` :::The song was confirmed as singles from ``The New Classic``. It should deleted from ``Other songs`` because in that section are songs that aren't ``singles``. And, Tables must have charts of countries, shouldn't have charts of same countries if now Azalea's works has peaks in territories. `	2,014	true	article	blocked	test	false
613,582,107	Huntster I didn't put the POV material in the article. BI put the POV material in the article. I just put the POV sign on it to try to get it resolved.	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
613,588,399	Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: Your first article Biographies of living persons How to write a great article The five pillars of Wikipedia Help pages Tutorial I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on . Again, welcome!	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
613,589,324	::::: Thanks for your opinion. User StaticVapor, please leave your opinion, you was who disagreed without explication to add countries charts.	2,014	true	article	blocked	dev	false
613,590,036	yours opinions. User StaticVapor, please leave	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
613,596,610	REDIRECT Talk:Garda whistle-blowers controversy	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
613,603,323	== WP:BOOMERANG rebuttal == I would like to point out that I said that after I had already asked this user to stop reverting my edits and instead he did not respond and just deleted my comments from his talk page, he then went and found a completely separate article I created over 1/2 a year ago a nominated for deletion. This is obviously harrassment. Just because made angry comments to one ignorant user, does not make me uncivil. When my negative comments were reverted I instead issued a warning template for harrassment to wp:logical cowboy, and asked him to please cease and desist with harassing me, next thing I know I've been blocked.	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
613,607,262	EDIT: As you can see the user has now found another article I created SEVERAL years ago, and is nominating for deletion, is this acceptable behavior on Wikipedia now?	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
613,608,868	Also, I was never notified by anyone that I was being considered for blocking, this is a direct violation of Wikipedia's policies. How can a user be blocked when the correct procedures have been followed. I should be allowed access to pages that Logical Cowboy is trying to delete in order to contest them. Articles should be rewritten to follow Wikipedia's standards not just deleted. I thought the purpose of this website was to provide information, not delete as much information as you can.	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
613,609,060	including Hunter Industries, Predictive Index and Mobile Electronic Certified Professional	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
613,610,490	I would also like to point out that before I made any negative comments to this user I attempted on TWO occasions to work it out in a civil manner with this user, and he ignored me and instead nominated another of my articles for deletion.	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
613,617,139	== Outdated data == I'd like to update the data regarding the number of Spaniards abroad according to the country's official statistics office: http://www.ine.es/prensa/np833.pdf If anyone can help me add these numbers, I'd appreciate it.	2,014	true	article	blocked	dev	false
613,618,232	, sent an email *	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
613,619,320	at the top right corner	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
613,625,774	== Linkrot ==	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
613,632,656	Insulted whom? The guy who called me a vandal? The guys who claim ownership? The guys warring with me? Have you blocked them yet?	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
613,633,100	June 2014 (UTC) ONLY 6 ARE BARE. ONLY 6. 01:29, 20	2,014	false	user	blocked	dev	false
613,636,405	REDIRECT Talk:Weishan Township, Ningxiang County	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
613,656,846	==Deletion!?== This is pretty ridiculous. Dude, you need to stick your head in a bucket of ice. This personal feud is starting to impair your judgment.	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	true
613,712,094	== Ridiculous == Good grief, you would think this Aaron Klein person was the most famous guy on the planet as long as this article is. This guy is an obscure Internet writer, not a candidate for US president and leader of the free world.	2,014	false	article	blocked	dev	false
613,713,041	::::: Great. See outline appearing below, for discussion. Le Prof	2,014	true	article	random	dev	false
613,716,250	:::::Wow, that's an amazing level of unjustified disdain. :::::Yes, bold is good, but the next step is to discuss when your boldness meets opposition. :::::Let's review: You did not bother to familiarize yourself with the hard work that many editors have put in to navigate a path between competing viewpoints. You made wholesale changes to the article based on snap judgments, and now you refuse to defend or even discuss them. :::::The only reason I am not reverting right now is that I want to promote discussion leading to WP:CONSENSUS, and I don't want that to be hijacked by the edit war that you seem to be trying to provoke. Thou has appealed to ANI; to ANI I shall go. /	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
613,721,143	Oh, hey, Blackguard! This isn't my first edit to Wikipedia, you know. Remember me? I vexed you a few weeks ago. I'm back, baby, I am BACK.	2,014	false	user	blocked	dev	false
613,721,213	` An Jung-geun is a terrorist, folks. Glorious Japan Forever! — Preceding undated comment added :That's nice. And Wiki isn't the place to argue it. Now if you happen to have a Wiki acceptable source that SAYS that, it can be included in the description. Otherwise all you're doing is POV pushing and vandalism. That might be a laugh in New Jersey where you are, but not here. Well, Jusenkyoguide, let's ask Ito Hirobumi (first prime minister of the country you profess to love so much) how he thinks of An. A hero? Nope. Terrorist? Probably. I wasn't aware that defending An Jung-geun was acceptable in Nagano, Japan. In fact, the Japanese government's stance is completely opposite. :I believe he considered him a fool, if the rather apocryphal story is true. That is neither here nor there however. Again, sources. The Japanese government's position is well worth noting (I believe he is viewed as an assassin and a convicted criminal). Perhaps you could find some sources on that. `	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
613,721,356	== You Dick == You're a big, anti-Japanese dick, you know that? I think you should be given an indefinite ban. That's what you should get, an indefinite ban!	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	true
613,723,786	__________________________________________________________________ BI: I am not biased, spamy, incorrect, or defiant. CNTs are not required to build all space tethers - only those that are as long as an Earth surface to geostationary orbit space elevator. There are space tethers in orbit right this very minute that are made with existing materials. Even the Boeing report that you have quoted says they are possible with existing materials. Is there an upper limit to the length that a practical space tether can be built with existing materials? Yes there is. The overall upper length limit for a non-rotating skyhook that is still economically worthwhile is probably around 5,000 km. To the best of my knowledge no one has gone to the trouble of actually determining that upper limit simply because by the time we build one that long there will be better materials that will allow us to build an even longer one. A good example of this is suspension bridges. About the longest you can build a practical suspension bridge using steel cable is a tad over one mile. They have since made longer ones using carbon fiber cables. But even carbon fiber cables are not strong enough to build a suspension bridge across the Strait of Gibraltar. It is all a matter of degree. With current materials we can build a non-rotating skyhook up to about 5,000 km in length if we push it. But we don't need to build one that long to make affordable space flight a reality. A 2,200 km long non-rotating skyhook will have a lower endpoint velocity of 80% of orbital velocity for that altitude, and an upper endpoint velocity of 91% of escape velocity for its altitude. Such a skyhook combined with a reusable single stage sub-orbital launch vehicle and the Orion spacecraft would give us affordable access to Earth orbit and all of near Earth space. Space tourism, asteroid mining, satellite solar power stations, and space colonies would all become possible with such a system. This is the truth. I don't know how to make it any clearer.	2,014	false	article	blocked	dev	false
613,726,290	` :Holy cow man it's two fucking words presented in context that are notable unto themselves at least amongst readers of the work for the past 30 years. They're iconic scenes and they have iconic quotes.— `	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
613,727,210	` == Random tagging == Your revert of my ``random tagging`` was rather disappointing behaviour, for someone with so many GAs I would have thought you would apply some common sense and actually look at the tags in question and the problems identified with several sources, rather that claim ownership of the article as top contributor. Needless to say that when one source leads to a 404 page and another is some commercial menu which does not match the citation because it has probably been removed and defaults to a home page, that is not ``random``, it is logically applied tagging based on factual concerns regarding the citations. Please don't waste my time making bullish reverts without first being aware of the problems, you're not the only person in the world with a right to contribute towards that or any other article, which, sorry to say, is pretty abysmal quality. Also, the link to cowboy worded as vaquero could be considered an WP:EGG, but it's also a pointless one as the latter article exists and there are differences between a cowboy and a vaquero, so the American word should not be used to mask the Iberian version of a cattleman if that's not what it means - there is an entire Atlantic Ocean and several thousand miles between them. `	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
613,736,684	::::::Hey, I think we're supposed to assume good faith here. Besides which, that's not what either Arzel or I said. Currently the article states that the investigation was launched by 5 district attorneys. That implies that 5 district attorneys got together and simultaneously agreed that an investigation should be launched. However, as I've stated above repeatedly, multiple reliable sources have referenced the fact that the investigation was launched by John Chisholm, Democratic district attorney. The other district attorney's presumably made the decision to join the investigation later. My edit indicates this.	2,014	true	article	random	test	false
613,756,014	` :I thought we were arguing about the quote from CNET and ``nominations`` in the section heading. If we leave both of those out, then we're done, and excellent job on the bulleted list. `	2,014	true	article	random	test	false
613,758,011	, 2014 }} {{ split to \| page = History of Brevard County, Florida \| diff = https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&diff;=prev&oldid;=608734830 \| date = 20:18, May 15	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
613,761,156	` :I can't block anyone, even some worse users than you (yes, they exist) still here. I just WANT you to STUDY ENGLISH, LEARN ENGLISH AND WRITE ENGLISH PROPERLY. That's too much? `	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
613,777,608	` == Trimming down climate == As it stands, the climate section is among the longest, if not the longest, among all major U.S. cities and seems excessive even to me. And I work on these sections (mostly climatology) quite often. I think it's time the section be split off to Climate of Seattle, organised by season (preferably describing typical weather patterns in each season), temperature, precip, snowfall, and extreme events. Could use the aid of someone familiar with the region's weather and relatively well-versed in meteorology. I can handle the climatology aspects. ``My master, , bids thee `` `	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
613,779,063	June 2014 (UTC) ::::Arguably, but it needs to change and you guys can't figure out how you want to do that. The way it's written right now implies white privilege is a thing that exists right now everywhere white people interact with people of any other race. Every one who comes along is going to read it as such. Now either put alleged back in, or figure out something better, because right now all I'm seeing is special interests campaigning. 06:33, 21	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
613,780,465	Addendum: On the white guilt page the opening line is as follows: [white guilt is the...] often said [to be felt...] Who is a frequent (and most recent) editor of that page? User Malik Shabazz.	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
613,785,275	Well he believed does not sound very academic but in an attempt to not show bias language is used that neither acts as if it was absolutely true or absolutely false, therefore wording it in a way that shows this might have led to the he believed, I still think it should be more along the lines of, he is said to have witnessed etc. As in how a documentary might say, the lion is taking a nap, we could talk about it without making about his personal belief etc. which I think could be contested, I believe claim is another word used, although not sure on what consensus there is around this.	2,014	true	article	random	dev	false
613,786,511	== The Edit War on This Article == Like myself, fans of Ms. Michaels are no doubt distressed by the petty actions of two Wikipedia usersMarauder40 and Hullaballoo Wolfowitzwho keep undoing my edits to this article. These two users constantly revert my edits with the claim that the article is too Peacock-y, and that it goes into too much depth about Ms. Michaels by detailing her rounds on the talk show circuit. I whole heartedly disagree. I think that her work on the various talk shows is some of the funniest, most impressive work of her career; and it is no small feat to appear on Ed Sullivan and The Tonight Show, let alone perform as well as she did. I hope the two editors who keep changing this article will realize this, and I encourage both of them to consider the possibility that only they, out of the countless editors on Wikipedia, have had any objections to the information on Ms. Michaels posted over the years. I don't know what their beef is with her, or if they have even seen any of her fine performances, but it would be appropriate for them to learn more about her before destroying the information about her on this free online encyclopedia.	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
613,791,996	`, such as the one you made with this edit to Template:Illustrator, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on . Thanks. ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ `	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
613,794,752	` ::As it's not ``your`` article, you're under no obligation to ``fix`` anything. Anyone can edit, anyone can tag, anyone can contribute at any level they seem fit. Tagging is not time wasting, it is a part of the wiki-system, designed, developed and implemented by the community and therefore by WP:consensus. Your little rant won't change that so don't bother using CAPS to apply emotion where no feelings exist. It's not your article to play ``mommy`` or ``servant`` to, unwatch it if bothers you so. Wiki is the site ``anyone can edit``, I use an IP as much as whores use condoms, to protect myself from the diseases regular editors spread, and because I'm WP:HUMAN. So much WP:Ownership expressed in one reply, for one poorly-managed article, so pitiful... so much lack of WP:AGF, even more pitiful. I don't want you to waste your breath, if it smells as noxious as your attitude it could be fatal to humanity. I DGAF what you personally think of me, IPs or tags, you're not even admin-material, what you say isn't worth spit, you'll just have to concede to that fact that the tags I placed are within reason, non-controversial, and need attending to and that you lack the manners, diligence and respect to recognise that fact, hence your self-important imperialistic and bitey response. Merry Christmas, I'll send you a toothbrush and then you can talk about my ass some more. Ta-ta! xxx `	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
613,799,765	:::::Ah yes. strange. You must have been on my mind ). I meant	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
613,817,006	Saying white privilege exists everywhere is tantamount to saying all white people are racist.	2,014	true	article	blocked	dev	false
613,817,215	. Doubting racism against white people exists is like doubting the existence of global warming	2,014	true	article	blocked	test	false
613,833,046	` :Please, have consideration for the productivity of this. The only concern of many of these people here is to blindly follow the press and what they deem to be reliable sources. Until the press changes its habits, no discussion on the naming of this page will lead anywhere. Enough is enough.``My master, , bids thee `` `	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
613,833,118	or reunification rightfully occurs	2,014	true	article	blocked	dev	false
613,834,969	, 21 June 2014 (UTC) :::::I was surprised at the lack of inclusion in this article, but then I did a search and discovered the lack of reliable sources. Perhaps sometimes soon this will be picked up by a serious news outlet. However, her contributions to Breen's writings are known and perhaps are noteworthy. 17:54	2,014	false	article	random	dev	false
613,840,914	` :Adding people to the category will usually be in breach of Wikipedia's core policies, particularly neutral point of view, as it will mean describing the people killed as tyrants, a pejorative label for all periods and locales except early-to-mid Classical Greece. You've already demonstrated that problem in claiming that King Claudius is a tyrant. You claim Julius Caesar is a tyrant, as Brutus is said to have claimed with his ``Sic semper tyrannis``; will you also accept John Wilkes Booth's use of that phrase? Please stop. `	2,014	true	user	random	test	false
613,844,407	== Cold fusion == Thank you for keeping an eye on Talk: Cold fusion, where the unregistered editors were disrupting the talk page. The unregistered editors have now been notified of discretionary sanctions.	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
613,847,654	` ::::Oh tut tut, such unproven accusations are so uncivil, but posturing from a nobody pretending to be a somebody still leaves a nobody. Enjoy being a zero, keyboard hero. If my attacks are ``vicious`` I'd hate to think what you call them when you use hyperbole. Oh wait... Ah well, you know what they say, a horse has more brains than the jockey. I guess that makes you a genius by donkey standards. ::::Btw, your username is no more ``anonymous`` than an IP – it's still just a nickname in a database that masks your real identity to give you access to an account, so go find another cliché to play with that makes sense ``Mister @``, doesn't matter if I'm using an IP or call myself ``Bob the builder`` it's still ``anonymous`` by the very definition of the word. Nil points. `	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	true
613,849,112	` == Holocaust responsibility == I would like to expand the following phrase in the Concentration camps, slave labour, and genocide section: *The German Nazis along with segments of the German civilian population were responsible for the Holocaust. The reason for this change is as historian Michael Berenbaum stated that Germany became a ``a genocidal state``… ``Every arm of the country's sophisticated bureaucracy was involved in the killing process. Parish churches and the Interior Ministry supplied birth records showing who was Jewish; the Post Office delivered the deportation and denaturalization orders; the Finance Ministry confiscated Jewish property; German firms fired Jewish workers and disenfranchised Jewish stockholders.`` Also, in the book The Death Marches: The Final Phase of Nazi Genocide the author writes of numerous incidents where German civilians hunted down concentration camp inmates, or murdered groups of them as they passed through their villages in forced marches. In conclusion, the current statement is incomplete, only placing blame on the political establishment, ignoring the fact that significant elements of the German society supported such fanatical ideas. `	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
613,849,356	- Go to fuck looser.	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	true
613,853,276	` ::::No need. I've dealt with him already `	2,014	true	user	random	dev	false
613,864,870	== Reverted your edit at European Parliament election, 2014‎; please don't violate WP:NPA == If you'd like to make the case that the material you excised was a WP:NPOV violation, please feel free to do so on the talk page. Edits with drive-by personal attacks, however, are not welcome.	2,014	true	user	random	dev	false
613,865,261	` (Copied from .) I just started reading the article on Cilicia, and I have found a sentence in which something doesn't seem quite right. It is in the middle of the first paragraph in the section Cilicia#Geography and nomenclature. It reads: :``Ancient Cilicia was naturally divided into Cilicia Trachaea and Cilicia Pedias divided by the Lamas Su. Salamis, the city on the east coast of Cyprus, was included in its administrative jurisdiction.`` Can you figure out how it ought to read? Also, at the end of that paragraph is the phrase, ``the northwesternmost part of the peninsula``, but no peninsula has yet been mentioned in the article, so my reaction was ``What peninsula?`` I don't even see one in the map of Cilicia. Perhaps the northeasternmost corner of Cyprus? `	2,014	true	user	random	test	false
613,867,130	==Request for Review== Hello! I am new to wikipedia and have been attempting to update the article Skyhook (structure). Another editor, BatteryIncluded, a biologist, (BI) insists that skyhooks and space tethers cannot be built with existing materials and sites articles that refer to space elevators (which cannot be built with existing materials). I have attempted to educate and have supplied numerous references but to no effect other then BI deletes the references and reverts the article back to an earlier version that is grossly incorrect. I have left many messages on the Talk page for that article but have gotten no response there. Another editor, Huntster, also non-technical, occasionally gets involved on the side of BI. Again no discussion of substance, just reverts and deletes. I am writing you because your bio says you are a mechanical engineer and in the hope you would review the article and maybe bring a little sanity to the situation. Please post any comments or suggestion you might have on the Skyhook (structure) Talk page. I will update the article one more time for you but who knows how long it will stay there. Thank you for your time. 72.199.145.35	2,014	false	user	blocked	dev	false
613,871,005	== You are guilty of trolling and edit warring == Kindly stop, or you will be blocked.	2,014	false	user	blocked	dev	false
613,879,167	==Article length and level of detail== I think... that it should not take longer to read the article about a film, than it takes to watch the film. I'm kidding. Well, I'm half kidding. The level of detail about openings, country-by-country, number of screens, sizes of opening weekends - it seems obsessively detailed, way beyond what an encyclopedia needs to cover. Details of interest to a tiny fraction of readers - shouldn't those remain in original sources? :, this level of detail is common and acceptable on Wikipedia; see WP:FILMMOS. :On a side note, I moved this section down to the bottom because, per Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#Layout, new sections go at the bottom (usually).	2,014	true	article	random	test	false
613,887,225	::I didn't accuse the other editor of being a biologist. BI's Talk page states he/she is a biologist. The reference to BI's background was simply an attempt to compare sources and their respective reliability. In any case, thank you for your time, I will post on the WP:DRN. 72.199.145.35	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
613,890,786	While Singapore may not have freedom of speech, you cannot compare it to Nazi Germany. You said Nazi Germany took better care of its people than Singapore... Did you know Germany gassed or shot about eleven million civilians they considered inferior?	2,014	false	user	blocked	test	false
613,911,992	== Question == Why is the Lugansk People's Republic listed, but not the Donetsk People's Republic (or ISIS)? It doesn't seem to fit the criteria (S. Ossetia isn't a UN member-state).	2,014	true	article	random	dev	false
613,915,585	:::::::::But when he deliberately only picks sources that use 'cm'...	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
613,922,973	Discussion of the article is irrelevant because you will quote barely relevant wording rules or whatever else to remove anything that contradicts your own racial sentiments. The glaring problem in that opening paragraph has been noticed by several people, and several times you have shot edits down despite them being improvements on the present form.	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
613,941,468	`== Wikipedia:Stalking == While I enjoyed playing S.T.A.L.K.E.R., I less enjoy Wikipedia:Stalking. `	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
613,941,811	== Blocked for marking link rot????????????? == Hi, I just got blocked for daring to mark articles with link rot problems. Blocked for tagging a problem????? Could you and the rest of the link rot specialists possibly come to my defence? Thanks so much,	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
613,944,676	is holding the reins of his horse as he is being inspired by a speech by the Emperor, he is clearly intended to be seen as a horseman	2,014	false	article	random	dev	false
613,948,788	== White privilege == Hi. I noticed you had contributed to the white privilege page. There is currently a discussion on the talk page which you may be able to contribute to.	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
613,949,169	== White privilege == I noticed your contributions to the white privilege page. There is a discussion on the talk page which you may be able to contribute to.	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
613,966,118	Yes I do think it to:-)	2,014	true	article	random	test	false
613,970,522	` == Genre and their sources == I don't think putting genres based on a single guy's review is not so fair and so solid. Because even Billboard puts albums like Pure Heroine in Top Rock Albums list. Yeah. An album can contain guitars and not-pop vocals but it doesn't make it a rock albums I think. Above all when they have heavy synth or hip-hop/trip hop (like Born to Die) elements And Dream pop? Source says ``Building on her signature dream pop sound...``. It's not like it directly says ``Her album's genre is Dream pop.`` It's more like talking about Born to Die and she's building some stuff on it. Yes it's better than labeling it Pop (as if Lana is freaking a Madonna or something) but I don't know... Maybe we don't need any genre, huh? I know I'm more like a edition+tracklisting+bonus track monster but it bugs me a little... Any thoughts about it? `	2,014	true	article	blocked	test	false
613,976,966	Rmzadeh would dearly enjoy having kinky sex with his own mother, or a goat, whichever was more attractive, at that moment	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	true
613,984,213	` The real problem is the set up for GOT wiki characters. Almost unprecedented, TV viewers don't want to be subject to the 'spoilers' from the books. If there's a possibility they will, they won't click on the wiki link. So just a plain Jon Snow description doesn't say if it's from the book or TV or both. Really, you should have two separate descriptions (``Jon SnowTV series`` and ``Jon Snowcharacter in a Song of Ice and Fire series``), such as exist in long running TV or movies series sometimes when they are not exactly the same as the book series. (Jack Ryan is a good example)`	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
613,985,898	` == A barnstar for you! == {\| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` \|rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` \| \|style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` \| The Teamwork Barnstar \|- \|style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` \| Together we can end racism! \|}`	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
614,004,410	::Yeah, you're right as well. It's the best pain-in-the-ass thing for the music articles. Thanks for responding by the way.	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
614,005,321	Edit: How about Alternative Rock as Amazon says? Because on Video Games page Pop reference is from Amazon.com. I believe that album is Alternative+Rock as well as Art/Dream/Chamber pop. Because it's obviously have tons of Alternative/Alternative Rock and Rock when it's compared to previous releases.	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
614,008,447	== Hey, buddy == You have now twice indicated that you quite literally know nothing about Wikipedia. So leave my edits alone.	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
614,010,051	== R. P. / R == Pick a surname, one surname, and use it.	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
614,014,801	You have already indicated previously that you know literally nothing about link rot or how it works. Leave it to those of us who do. As for the ownership-claiming guy who knows nothing about how Wikipedia works, have you blocked him for his edit warring? I suggest you resign since you are not competent to hold this position and for the abuse of your discretionary authority. Resign.	2,014	false	user	blocked	test	false
614,027,130	` == AN/I == Although I haven't worked on WP:CHINA for a while, please take a look. ``My master, , bids thee `` `	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
614,029,638	}} {{wikibreak \| back=Northern Hemisphere winter solstice \| Lieutenant of Melkor	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
614,030,369	` ::::Key word, again, previously. In your eyes, it may be lack of maturity. Keep in mind ``many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view``. To me, as long as someone is not over-the-top as I once was before Aug 2013, there is always room in this project for him/her, and secondly, I won't be disabling Javascript (Wikibreak enforcer) to be conversing with someone who lacks the total patience and objectivity to avoid a one-sided view of a topic. See you on the shortest day of the year in my Hemisphere. ``My master, , bids thee `` `	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
614,031,859	` == YGM == As the title implies, you have new e-mail from me. Please respond by e-mail, as I'm not going to disable Javascript a second time. ``My master, , bids thee `` `	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
614,035,196	== A barnstar for you == You get your Content Review Medal and Gold Wiki Award for blocking Excirial. - The MKG	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
614,037,695	` Dear Omedon: Although you did the first revert, and then did another one, you accused me of ``edit warring.`` That's a personal attack. Why, exactly, aren't you guilty of the same? I'm giving you the victory, but letting you know I believe you should not be an editor because you aren't qualified. Its time for Wikipedia to go pro, fire all the amateur editors, and hire a professional staff, i.e., writers and editors who won't try to whitewash historical villains like Jefferson Davis by referring to him as an ``American`` and deleting any attempt to identify him for what he really was, which was the leading proponent (and a hefty practitioner) of slavery. ArdenHathaway `	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
614,038,844	` ``Wikibully`` refers to Wikipedia ``administrators`` who exploit their status to win edit wars so they can promote their own biases and viewpoints.`	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false

613,502,568

` ==BI, you said you wanted to talk== At the bottom of the lead section you have written: ``Its promoter speculated in 1994 that the skyhook concept could be cost competitive with what is realistically thought to be achievable using a space elevator, but the skyhook is not competitive with other rotating tether concepts. In addition, the rotating skyhook is in fact deemed ``not engineeringly feasible using presently available materials``.`` Regarding: In addition, the rotating skyhook is in fact deemed ``not engineeringly feasible using presently available materials`` That statement appears to come from Ref [3] on page 10. The full quote is ``If the mass of the tether alone started to exceed 200 times the mass of the payload, then that was an indication the particular scenario being considered was not engineeringly feasible using presently available materials, although the application might become feasible in the near future as better materials become available with higher tensile strengths at higher operational temperatures.`` It then goes on to say ``As we shall see, presently available commercial materials will suffice to make the HASTOL tethers needed. The primary message we want to leave with the Reader is: “We don't need magic materials like ‘Buckminster-Fuller-carbon-nanotubes’ to make the space tether facility for a HASTOL system. Existing materials will do.”`` So it would appear that you misread your reference. The tether mass of 200 times mass of the payload mass is the upper limit to the problem. Systems where the tether mass is less than 200 times the payload mass can be built with ``presently available commercial materials.`` To further reinforce this the Conclusion to the report states ``The fundamental conclusion of the Phase I HASTOL study effort is that the concept is technically feasible. We have evaluated a number of alternate system configurations that will allow hypersonic air-breathing vehicle technologies to be combined with orbiting, spinning space tether technologies to provide a method of moving payloads from the surface of the Earth into Earth orbit. For more than one HASTOL architecture concept, we have developed a design solution using existing, or near-term technologies. We expect that a number of the other HASTOL architecture concepts will prove similarly technically feasible when subjected to detailed design studies. The systems are completely reusable and have the potential of drastically reducing the cost of Earth-to-orbit space access.`` Regarding: ``but the skyhook is not competitive with other rotating tether concepts.`` and ``A 2000 Boeing report on the possibillity of combining skyhooks with hypersonic planes concluded that ``In general, the non-spinning tether HyperSkyhook concept does not look competitive with the spinning tether concepts.``.`` The full quote is: ``HyperSkyhook In 1995 Zubrin proposed the “Hypersonic Skyhook” as a solution to the mismatch between the attainable atmospheric speeds of a hypersonic airplane and the orbital speeds of space tethers. Since the orbital speed of the space tether decreases with increasing altitu

2,014

false

article

blocked

test

false

613,513,358

Yeah, I know QoS is the movie. I want to know where the talk page for Quantum of Solace is. I can't find it on the article. - 11:22 PM, 18 June, 2014

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

613,525,838

|action2result=promoted |ftname=Looking Glass Studios video games |topic=Video games |currentstatus=GA

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

613,526,410

` ::: I will keep your very objective and useful comments in mind. Anything of substance? `

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

613,526,591

`:: If it is possible, yes, I promise. `

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

613,528,142

` == Gallium3D == Hi, I think I managed to transform Gallium3D into an article that is good. See your comment here: Talk:Gallium3D#This article sucks. Any further suggestions? `

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

613,528,480

` : Intel seem to disagree with you. They rather write their driver the old way, and do not loose 5-10% of computing power. For people who would like to use Linux as a gaming platform, 5-10% loss in performance due to (avoidable?) layers of abstraction (i.e. John D. Carmack's ``layers of crap``) is quite much. The claim, that Gallium3D could cost maybe 5-10% of performance is from some VMware employee, in some Video I once watched on YouTube. `

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

613,528,851

` :: VMware does virtualization. So, it is relevant for any platform. Developers of Free and open-source graphics device drivers/Mesa 3D make use of it, since it lessens their burden to develop device drivers. But e.g. Intel, still programs their Linux driver the old way, most probably because the Gallium3D drivers introduce a performance penalty (and maybe also, because improvements in Mesa3D directly benefit the device drivers for the competition). `

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

613,532,513

` :::This also needs doing in the body (currently under ``Media and culture`` but may be worth moving to ``History``) `

2,014

true

article

random

test

false

613,535,201

` == software license & supported platforms == The article in its current form, concentrates only on the software license of the game engines. It says little to nothing about the supported platforms/operating systems. `

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

613,538,068

== pleasure stop edit == I hate you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

true

613,538,287

I hate you? I hate you!

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

true

613,543,332

== Input needed at genre discussion == Hey there, could you give your input for the addition of alternative metal to the infobox at The Hunting Party? There's been disputes over genres lately, so I'm trying to establish a consensus for alternative metal to be listed alongside the current genres (hard rock and rap rock). Here is the thread for the poll: Talk:The Hunting Party (album)#Genre Poll

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

613,554,887

` == Shut up loser == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` | Best in Awfulness |- |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | I dont care about you and what you do. Dyou know how to MYOB? Oh! It's mind your own business! |}`

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

true

613,555,360

` == Mind your own business == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` | Mind your own business |- |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | Read between the lines dearie <3 |}`

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

613,562,423

`Merging the article ``War crimes in occupied Poland during World War II`` with the article ``Occupation of Poland (1939–45)`` is meaningless and would lead to a lot of confusion in the future. Why? Mostly because as we speak of Poland occupied by German Nazis we think about the territory and its history, while war crimes in occupied Poland could be a way to omit some historical facts, when focusing only on Nazi crimes, without mentioning the whole the history of German occupation of Poland. Facts shall not be omitted. My opinion is NOT, the articles should not be merged. Regards. `

2,014

true

article

blocked

test

false

613,580,902

_____________________________________________________________________________ How do we come to a consensus when you don't say anything here and I have shown that you have misquoted a reference? So you going to lock me out of the article again?

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

613,581,699

` :::The song was confirmed as singles from ``The New Classic``. It should deleted from ``Other songs`` because in that section are songs that aren't ``singles``. And, Tables must have charts of countries, shouldn't have charts of same countries if now Azalea's works has peaks in territories. `

2,014

true

article

blocked

test

false

613,582,107

Huntster I didn't put the POV material in the article. BI put the POV material in the article. I just put the POV sign on it to try to get it resolved.

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

613,588,399

Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: *Your first article *Biographies of living persons *How to write a great article *The five pillars of Wikipedia *Help pages *Tutorial I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on . Again, welcome!

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

613,589,324

::::: Thanks for your opinion. User StaticVapor, please leave your opinion, you was who disagreed without explication to add countries charts.

2,014

true

article

blocked

dev

false

613,590,036

yours opinions. User StaticVapor, please leave

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

613,596,610

REDIRECT Talk:Garda whistle-blowers controversy

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

613,603,323

== WP:BOOMERANG rebuttal == I would like to point out that I said that after I had already asked this user to stop reverting my edits and instead he did not respond and just deleted my comments from his talk page, he then went and found a completely separate article I created over 1/2 a year ago a nominated for deletion. This is obviously harrassment. Just because made angry comments to one ignorant user, does not make me uncivil. When my negative comments were reverted I instead issued a warning template for harrassment to wp:logical cowboy, and asked him to please cease and desist with harassing me, next thing I know I've been blocked.

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

613,607,262

EDIT: As you can see the user has now found another article I created SEVERAL years ago, and is nominating for deletion, is this acceptable behavior on Wikipedia now?

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

613,608,868

Also, I was never notified by anyone that I was being considered for blocking, this is a direct violation of Wikipedia's policies. How can a user be blocked when the correct procedures have been followed. I should be allowed access to pages that Logical Cowboy is trying to delete in order to contest them. Articles should be rewritten to follow Wikipedia's standards not just deleted. I thought the purpose of this website was to provide information, not delete as much information as you can.

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

613,609,060

including Hunter Industries, Predictive Index and Mobile Electronic Certified Professional

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

613,610,490

I would also like to point out that before I made any negative comments to this user I attempted on TWO occasions to work it out in a civil manner with this user, and he ignored me and instead nominated another of my articles for deletion.

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

613,617,139

== Outdated data == I'd like to update the data regarding the number of Spaniards abroad according to the country's official statistics office: http://www.ine.es/prensa/np833.pdf If anyone can help me add these numbers, I'd appreciate it.

2,014

true

article

blocked

dev

false

613,618,232

, sent an email *

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

613,619,320

at the top right corner

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

613,625,774

== Linkrot ==

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

613,632,656

Insulted whom? The guy who called me a vandal? The guys who claim ownership? The guys warring with me? Have you blocked them yet?

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

613,633,100

June 2014 (UTC) ONLY 6 ARE BARE. ONLY 6. 01:29, 20

2,014

false

user

blocked

dev

false

613,636,405

REDIRECT Talk:Weishan Township, Ningxiang County

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

613,656,846

==Deletion!?== This is pretty ridiculous. Dude, you need to stick your head in a bucket of ice. This personal feud is starting to impair your judgment.

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

true

613,712,094

== Ridiculous == Good grief, you would think this Aaron Klein person was the most famous guy on the planet as long as this article is. This guy is an obscure Internet writer, not a candidate for US president and leader of the free world.

2,014

false

article

blocked

dev

false

613,713,041

::::: Great. See outline appearing below, for discussion. Le Prof

2,014

true

article

random

dev

false

613,716,250

:::::Wow, that's an amazing level of unjustified disdain. :::::Yes, bold is good, but the next step is to discuss when your boldness meets opposition. :::::Let's review: You did not bother to familiarize yourself with the hard work that many editors have put in to navigate a path between competing viewpoints. You made wholesale changes to the article based on snap judgments, and now you refuse to defend or even discuss them. :::::The only reason I am not reverting right now is that I want to promote discussion leading to WP:CONSENSUS, and I don't want that to be hijacked by the edit war that you seem to be trying to provoke. Thou has appealed to ANI; to ANI I shall go. /

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

613,721,143

Oh, hey, Blackguard! This isn't my first edit to Wikipedia, you know. Remember me? I vexed you a few weeks ago. I'm back, baby, I am BACK.

2,014

false

user

blocked

dev

false

613,721,213

` An Jung-geun is a terrorist, folks. Glorious Japan Forever! — Preceding undated comment added :That's nice. And Wiki isn't the place to argue it. Now if you happen to have a Wiki acceptable source that SAYS that, it can be included in the description. Otherwise all you're doing is POV pushing and vandalism. That might be a laugh in New Jersey where you are, but not here. Well, Jusenkyoguide, let's ask Ito Hirobumi (first prime minister of the country you profess to love so much) how he thinks of An. A hero? Nope. Terrorist? Probably. I wasn't aware that defending An Jung-geun was acceptable in Nagano, Japan. In fact, the Japanese government's stance is completely opposite. :I believe he considered him a fool, if the rather apocryphal story is true. That is neither here nor there however. Again, sources. The Japanese government's position is well worth noting (I believe he is viewed as an assassin and a convicted criminal). Perhaps you could find some sources on that. `

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

613,721,356

== You Dick == You're a big, anti-Japanese dick, you know that? I think you should be given an indefinite ban. That's what you should get, an indefinite ban!

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

true

613,723,786

__________________________________________________________________ BI: I am not biased, spamy, incorrect, or defiant. CNTs are not required to build all space tethers - only those that are as long as an Earth surface to geostationary orbit space elevator. There are space tethers in orbit right this very minute that are made with existing materials. Even the Boeing report that you have quoted says they are possible with existing materials. Is there an upper limit to the length that a practical space tether can be built with existing materials? Yes there is. The overall upper length limit for a non-rotating skyhook that is still economically worthwhile is probably around 5,000 km. To the best of my knowledge no one has gone to the trouble of actually determining that upper limit simply because by the time we build one that long there will be better materials that will allow us to build an even longer one. A good example of this is suspension bridges. About the longest you can build a practical suspension bridge using steel cable is a tad over one mile. They have since made longer ones using carbon fiber cables. But even carbon fiber cables are not strong enough to build a suspension bridge across the Strait of Gibraltar. It is all a matter of degree. With current materials we can build a non-rotating skyhook up to about 5,000 km in length if we push it. But we don't need to build one that long to make affordable space flight a reality. A 2,200 km long non-rotating skyhook will have a lower endpoint velocity of 80% of orbital velocity for that altitude, and an upper endpoint velocity of 91% of escape velocity for its altitude. Such a skyhook combined with a reusable single stage sub-orbital launch vehicle and the Orion spacecraft would give us affordable access to Earth orbit and all of near Earth space. Space tourism, asteroid mining, satellite solar power stations, and space colonies would all become possible with such a system. This is the truth. I don't know how to make it any clearer.

2,014

false

article

blocked

dev

false

613,726,290

` :Holy cow man it's two fucking words presented in context that are notable unto themselves at least amongst readers of the work for the past 30 years. They're iconic scenes and they have iconic quotes.— `

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

613,727,210

` == Random tagging == Your revert of my ``random tagging`` was rather disappointing behaviour, for someone with so many GAs I would have thought you would apply some common sense and actually look at the tags in question and the problems identified with several sources, rather that claim ownership of the article as top contributor. Needless to say that when one source leads to a 404 page and another is some commercial menu which does not match the citation because it has probably been removed and defaults to a home page, that is not ``random``, it is logically applied tagging based on factual concerns regarding the citations. Please don't waste my time making bullish reverts without first being aware of the problems, you're not the only person in the world with a right to contribute towards that or any other article, which, sorry to say, is pretty abysmal quality. Also, the link to cowboy worded as vaquero could be considered an WP:EGG, but it's also a pointless one as the latter article exists and there are differences between a cowboy and a vaquero, so the American word should not be used to mask the Iberian version of a cattleman if that's not what it means - there is an entire Atlantic Ocean and several thousand miles between them. `

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

613,736,684

::::::Hey, I think we're supposed to assume good faith here. Besides which, that's not what either Arzel or I said. Currently the article states that the investigation was launched by 5 district attorneys. That implies that 5 district attorneys got together and simultaneously agreed that an investigation should be launched. However, as I've stated above repeatedly, multiple reliable sources have referenced the fact that the investigation was launched by John Chisholm, Democratic district attorney. The other district attorney's presumably made the decision to join the investigation later. My edit indicates this.

2,014

true

article

random

test

false

613,756,014

` :I thought we were arguing about the quote from CNET and ``nominations`` in the section heading. If we leave both of those out, then we're done, and excellent job on the bulleted list. `

2,014

true

article

random

test

false

613,758,011

, 2014 }} {{ split to | page = History of Brevard County, Florida | diff = https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&diff;=prev&oldid;=608734830 | date = 20:18, May 15

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

613,761,156

` :I can't block anyone, even some worse users than you (yes, they exist) still here. I just WANT you to STUDY ENGLISH, LEARN ENGLISH AND WRITE ENGLISH PROPERLY. That's too much? `

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

613,777,608

` == Trimming down climate == As it stands, the climate section is among the longest, if not the longest, among all major U.S. cities and seems excessive even to me. And I work on these sections (mostly climatology) quite often. I think it's time the section be split off to Climate of Seattle, organised by season (preferably describing typical weather patterns in each season), temperature, precip, snowfall, and extreme events. Could use the aid of someone familiar with the region's weather and relatively well-versed in meteorology. I can handle the climatology aspects. ``My master, , bids thee `` `

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

613,779,063

June 2014 (UTC) ::::Arguably, but it needs to change and you guys can't figure out how you want to do that. The way it's written right now implies white privilege is a thing that exists right now everywhere white people interact with people of any other race. Every one who comes along is going to read it as such. Now either put alleged back in, or figure out something better, because right now all I'm seeing is special interests campaigning. 06:33, 21

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

613,780,465

Addendum: On the white guilt page the opening line is as follows: [white guilt is the...] often said [to be felt...] Who is a frequent (and most recent) editor of that page? User Malik Shabazz.

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

613,785,275

Well he believed does not sound very academic but in an attempt to not show bias language is used that neither acts as if it was absolutely true or absolutely false, therefore wording it in a way that shows this might have led to the he believed, I still think it should be more along the lines of, he is said to have witnessed etc. As in how a documentary might say, the lion is taking a nap, we could talk about it without making about his personal belief etc. which I think could be contested, I believe claim is another word used, although not sure on what consensus there is around this.

2,014

true

article

random

dev

false

613,786,511

== The Edit War on This Article == Like myself, fans of Ms. Michaels are no doubt distressed by the petty actions of two Wikipedia usersMarauder40 and Hullaballoo Wolfowitzwho keep undoing my edits to this article. These two users constantly revert my edits with the claim that the article is too Peacock-y, and that it goes into too much depth about Ms. Michaels by detailing her rounds on the talk show circuit. I whole heartedly disagree. I think that her work on the various talk shows is some of the funniest, most impressive work of her career; and it is no small feat to appear on Ed Sullivan and The Tonight Show, let alone perform as well as she did. I hope the two editors who keep changing this article will realize this, and I encourage both of them to consider the possibility that only they, out of the countless editors on Wikipedia, have had any objections to the information on Ms. Michaels posted over the years. I don't know what their beef is with her, or if they have even seen any of her fine performances, but it would be appropriate for them to learn more about her before destroying the information about her on this free online encyclopedia.

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

613,791,996

`, such as the one you made with this edit to Template:Illustrator, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on . Thanks. ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ `

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

613,794,752

` ::As it's not ``your`` article, you're under no obligation to ``fix`` anything. Anyone can edit, anyone can tag, anyone can contribute at any level they seem fit. Tagging is not time wasting, it is a part of the wiki-system, designed, developed and implemented by the community and therefore by WP:consensus. Your little rant won't change that so don't bother using CAPS to apply emotion where no feelings exist. It's not your article to play ``mommy`` or ``servant`` to, unwatch it if bothers you so. Wiki is the site ``anyone can edit``, I use an IP as much as whores use condoms, to protect myself from the diseases regular editors spread, and because I'm WP:HUMAN. So much WP:Ownership expressed in one reply, for one poorly-managed article, so pitiful... so much lack of WP:AGF, even more pitiful. I don't want you to waste your breath, if it smells as noxious as your attitude it could be fatal to humanity. I DGAF what you personally think of me, IPs or tags, you're not even admin-material, what you say isn't worth spit, you'll just have to concede to that fact that the tags I placed are within reason, non-controversial, and need attending to and that you lack the manners, diligence and respect to recognise that fact, hence your self-important imperialistic and bitey response. Merry Christmas, I'll send you a toothbrush and then you can talk about my ass some more. Ta-ta! xxx `

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

613,799,765

:::::Ah yes. strange. You must have been on my mind ). I meant

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

613,817,006

Saying white privilege exists everywhere is tantamount to saying all white people are racist.

2,014

true

article

blocked

dev

false

613,817,215

. Doubting racism against white people exists is like doubting the existence of global warming

2,014

true

article

blocked

test

false

613,833,046

` :Please, have consideration for the productivity of this. The only concern of many of these people here is to blindly follow the press and what they deem to be reliable sources. Until the press changes its habits, no discussion on the naming of this page will lead anywhere. Enough is enough.``My master, , bids thee `` `

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

613,833,118

or reunification rightfully occurs

2,014

true

article

blocked

dev

false

613,834,969

, 21 June 2014 (UTC) :::::I was surprised at the lack of inclusion in this article, but then I did a search and discovered the lack of reliable sources. Perhaps sometimes soon this will be picked up by a serious news outlet. However, her contributions to Breen's writings are known and perhaps are noteworthy. 17:54

2,014

false

article

random

dev

false

613,840,914

` :Adding people to the category will usually be in breach of Wikipedia's core policies, particularly neutral point of view, as it will mean describing the people killed as tyrants, a pejorative label for all periods and locales except early-to-mid Classical Greece. You've already demonstrated that problem in claiming that King Claudius is a tyrant. You claim Julius Caesar is a tyrant, as Brutus is said to have claimed with his ``Sic semper tyrannis``; will you also accept John Wilkes Booth's use of that phrase? Please stop. `

2,014

true

user

random

test

false

613,844,407

== Cold fusion == Thank you for keeping an eye on Talk: Cold fusion, where the unregistered editors were disrupting the talk page. The unregistered editors have now been notified of discretionary sanctions.

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

613,847,654

` ::::Oh tut tut, such unproven accusations are so uncivil, but posturing from a nobody pretending to be a somebody still leaves a nobody. Enjoy being a zero, keyboard hero. If my attacks are ``vicious`` I'd hate to think what you call them when you use hyperbole. Oh wait... Ah well, you know what they say, a horse has more brains than the jockey. I guess that makes you a genius by donkey standards. ::::Btw, your username is no more ``anonymous`` than an IP – it's still just a nickname in a database that masks your real identity to give you access to an account, so go find another cliché to play with that makes sense ``Mister @``, doesn't matter if I'm using an IP or call myself ``Bob the builder`` it's still ``anonymous`` by the very definition of the word. Nil points. `

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

true

613,849,112

` == Holocaust responsibility == I would like to expand the following phrase in the Concentration camps, slave labour, and genocide section: *The German Nazis along with segments of the German civilian population were responsible for the Holocaust. The reason for this change is as historian Michael Berenbaum stated that Germany became a ``a genocidal state``… ``Every arm of the country's sophisticated bureaucracy was involved in the killing process. Parish churches and the Interior Ministry supplied birth records showing who was Jewish; the Post Office delivered the deportation and denaturalization orders; the Finance Ministry confiscated Jewish property; German firms fired Jewish workers and disenfranchised Jewish stockholders.`` Also, in the book The Death Marches: The Final Phase of Nazi Genocide the author writes of numerous incidents where German civilians hunted down concentration camp inmates, or murdered groups of them as they passed through their villages in forced marches. In conclusion, the current statement is incomplete, only placing blame on the political establishment, ignoring the fact that significant elements of the German society supported such fanatical ideas. `

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

613,849,356

- Go to fuck looser.

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

true

613,853,276

` ::::No need. I've dealt with him already `

2,014

true

user

random

dev

false

613,864,870

== Reverted your edit at European Parliament election, 2014‎; please don't violate WP:NPA == If you'd like to make the case that the material you excised was a WP:NPOV violation, please feel free to do so on the talk page. Edits with drive-by personal attacks, however, are not welcome.

2,014

true

user

random

dev

false

613,865,261

` (Copied from .) I just started reading the article on Cilicia, and I have found a sentence in which something doesn't seem quite right. It is in the middle of the first paragraph in the section Cilicia#Geography and nomenclature. It reads: :``Ancient Cilicia was naturally divided into Cilicia Trachaea and Cilicia Pedias divided by the Lamas Su. Salamis, the city on the east coast of Cyprus, was included in its administrative jurisdiction.`` Can you figure out how it ought to read? Also, at the end of that paragraph is the phrase, ``the northwesternmost part of the peninsula``, but no peninsula has yet been mentioned in the article, so my reaction was ``What peninsula?`` I don't even see one in the map of Cilicia. Perhaps the northeasternmost corner of Cyprus? `

2,014

true

user

random

test

false

613,867,130

==Request for Review== Hello! I am new to wikipedia and have been attempting to update the article Skyhook (structure). Another editor, BatteryIncluded, a biologist, (BI) insists that skyhooks and space tethers cannot be built with existing materials and sites articles that refer to space elevators (which cannot be built with existing materials). I have attempted to educate and have supplied numerous references but to no effect other then BI deletes the references and reverts the article back to an earlier version that is grossly incorrect. I have left many messages on the Talk page for that article but have gotten no response there. Another editor, Huntster, also non-technical, occasionally gets involved on the side of BI. Again no discussion of substance, just reverts and deletes. I am writing you because your bio says you are a mechanical engineer and in the hope you would review the article and maybe bring a little sanity to the situation. Please post any comments or suggestion you might have on the Skyhook (structure) Talk page. I will update the article one more time for you but who knows how long it will stay there. Thank you for your time. 72.199.145.35

2,014

false

user

blocked

dev

false

613,871,005

== You are guilty of trolling and edit warring == Kindly stop, or you will be blocked.

2,014

false

user

blocked

dev

false

613,879,167

==Article length and level of detail== I think... that it should not take longer to read the article about a film, than it takes to watch the film. I'm kidding. Well, I'm half kidding. The level of detail about openings, country-by-country, number of screens, sizes of opening weekends - it seems obsessively detailed, way beyond what an encyclopedia needs to cover. Details of interest to a tiny fraction of readers - shouldn't those remain in original sources? :, this level of detail is common and acceptable on Wikipedia; see WP:FILMMOS. :On a side note, I moved this section down to the bottom because, per Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#Layout, new sections go at the bottom (usually).

2,014

true

article

random

test

false

613,887,225

::I didn't accuse the other editor of being a biologist. BI's Talk page states he/she is a biologist. The reference to BI's background was simply an attempt to compare sources and their respective reliability. In any case, thank you for your time, I will post on the WP:DRN. 72.199.145.35

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

613,890,786

While Singapore may not have freedom of speech, you cannot compare it to Nazi Germany. You said Nazi Germany took better care of its people than Singapore... Did you know Germany gassed or shot about eleven million civilians they considered inferior?

2,014

false

user

blocked

test

false

613,911,992

== Question == Why is the Lugansk People's Republic listed, but not the Donetsk People's Republic (or ISIS)? It doesn't seem to fit the criteria (S. Ossetia isn't a UN member-state).

2,014

true

article

random

dev

false

613,915,585

:::::::::But when he deliberately only picks sources that use 'cm'...

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

613,922,973

Discussion of the article is irrelevant because you will quote barely relevant wording rules or whatever else to remove anything that contradicts your own racial sentiments. The glaring problem in that opening paragraph has been noticed by several people, and several times you have shot edits down despite them being improvements on the present form.

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

613,941,468

`== Wikipedia:Stalking == While I enjoyed playing S.T.A.L.K.E.R., I less enjoy Wikipedia:Stalking. `

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

613,941,811

== Blocked for marking link rot????????????? == Hi, I just got blocked for daring to mark articles with link rot problems. Blocked for tagging a problem????? Could you and the rest of the link rot specialists possibly come to my defence? Thanks so much,

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

613,944,676

is holding the reins of his horse as he is being inspired by a speech by the Emperor, he is clearly intended to be seen as a horseman

2,014

false

article

random

dev

false

613,948,788

== White privilege == Hi. I noticed you had contributed to the white privilege page. There is currently a discussion on the talk page which you may be able to contribute to.

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

613,949,169

== White privilege == I noticed your contributions to the white privilege page. There is a discussion on the talk page which you may be able to contribute to.

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

613,966,118

Yes I do think it to:-)

2,014

true

article

random

test

false

613,970,522

` == Genre and their sources == I don't think putting genres based on a single guy's review is not so fair and so solid. Because even Billboard puts albums like Pure Heroine in Top Rock Albums list. Yeah. An album can contain guitars and not-pop vocals but it doesn't make it a rock albums I think. Above all when they have heavy synth or hip-hop/trip hop (like Born to Die) elements And Dream pop? Source says ``Building on her signature dream pop sound...``. It's not like it directly says ``Her album's genre is Dream pop.`` It's more like talking about Born to Die and she's building some stuff on it. Yes it's better than labeling it Pop (as if Lana is freaking a Madonna or something) but I don't know... Maybe we don't need any genre, huh? I know I'm more like a edition+tracklisting+bonus track monster but it bugs me a little... Any thoughts about it? `

2,014

true

article

blocked

test

false

613,976,966

Rmzadeh would dearly enjoy having kinky sex with his own mother, or a goat, whichever was more attractive, at that moment

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

true

613,984,213

` The real problem is the set up for GOT wiki characters. Almost unprecedented, TV viewers don't want to be subject to the 'spoilers' from the books. If there's a possibility they will, they won't click on the wiki link. So just a plain Jon Snow description doesn't say if it's from the book or TV or both. Really, you should have two separate descriptions (``Jon SnowTV series`` and ``Jon Snowcharacter in a Song of Ice and Fire series``), such as exist in long running TV or movies series sometimes when they are not exactly the same as the book series. (Jack Ryan is a good example)`

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

613,985,898

` == A barnstar for you! == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` | The Teamwork Barnstar |- |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | Together we can end racism! |}`

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

614,004,410

::Yeah, you're right as well. It's the best pain-in-the-ass thing for the music articles. Thanks for responding by the way.

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

614,005,321

Edit: How about Alternative Rock as Amazon says? Because on Video Games page Pop reference is from Amazon.com. I believe that album is Alternative+Rock as well as Art/Dream/Chamber pop. Because it's obviously have tons of Alternative/Alternative Rock and Rock when it's compared to previous releases.

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

614,008,447

== Hey, buddy == You have now twice indicated that you quite literally know nothing about Wikipedia. So leave my edits alone.

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

614,010,051

== R. P. / R == Pick a surname, one surname, and use it.

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

614,014,801

You have already indicated previously that you know literally nothing about link rot or how it works. Leave it to those of us who do. As for the ownership-claiming guy who knows nothing about how Wikipedia works, have you blocked him for his edit warring? I suggest you resign since you are not competent to hold this position and for the abuse of your discretionary authority. Resign.

2,014

false

user

blocked

test

false

614,027,130

` == AN/I == Although I haven't worked on WP:CHINA for a while, please take a look. ``My master, , bids thee `` `

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

614,029,638

}} {{wikibreak | back=Northern Hemisphere winter solstice | Lieutenant of Melkor

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

614,030,369

` ::::Key word, again, previously. In your eyes, it may be lack of maturity. Keep in mind ``many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view``. To me, as long as someone is not over-the-top as I once was before Aug 2013, there is always room in this project for him/her, and secondly, I won't be disabling Javascript (Wikibreak enforcer) to be conversing with someone who lacks the total patience and objectivity to avoid a one-sided view of a topic. See you on the shortest day of the year in my Hemisphere. ``My master, , bids thee `` `

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

614,031,859

` == YGM == As the title implies, you have new e-mail from me. Please respond by e-mail, as I'm not going to disable Javascript a second time. ``My master, , bids thee `` `

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

614,035,196

== A barnstar for you == You get your Content Review Medal and Gold Wiki Award for blocking Excirial. - The MKG

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

614,037,695

` Dear Omedon: Although you did the first revert, and then did another one, you accused me of ``edit warring.`` That's a personal attack. Why, exactly, aren't you guilty of the same? I'm giving you the victory, but letting you know I believe you should not be an editor because you aren't qualified. Its time for Wikipedia to go pro, fire all the amateur editors, and hire a professional staff, i.e., writers and editors who won't try to whitewash historical villains like Jefferson Davis by referring to him as an ``American`` and deleting any attempt to identify him for what he really was, which was the leading proponent (and a hefty practitioner) of slavery. ArdenHathaway `

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

614,038,844

` ``Wikibully`` refers to Wikipedia ``administrators`` who exploit their status to win edit wars so they can promote their own biases and viewpoints.`

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false