dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
612,872,744	:Support. If you see anything that's worth salvaging from this page, feel free to merge it into the Cities Proper list and turn this page into a redirect. That is basically the outcome of the AfD discussion. Just be careful with the populations of the Chinese cities, as they usually govern many counties and county-level cities which should not be included in the city proper calculation. -	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
612,877,003	== Reculver == Hi - I've raised in more detail the issues around the use of National Archives notes as sources. I'm inclined to the view that they can't be relied apon as they are not true secondary sources, but I'm open to alternative arguments. I've raised it at the FAC talk page. You might want to invite others to engage. Even if these sources get rejected, they only marginally affect the article on Reculver, which i think should go through perhaps with one sentence and one footnote removed. Regards,	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
612,877,322	` (UTC) IMO, desktop environments like GNOME or KDE SC, provide an entire plethora of programs. I think the main problem is the distinction between the GUI of any program, which is composed of GUI widgets and works as part of a Windowing system and special programs like GNOME Panel, GNOME Shell, which can best be termed as ``graphical shells``. Some people call them UX. 11:02, 14 June 2014`	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
612,877,789	` (UTC) ::: Windows explorer is IMO file browser. But it could additionally be a window manager, compositor, etc. This additional functions would make it a graphical shell. 11:08, 14 June 2014`	2,014	true	article	blocked	test	false
612,881,648	REDIRECT Talk:2012 Viva World Cup	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
612,889,820	` :``Without explaining why?`` Please read history. `	2,014	true	user	random	test	false
612,918,783	` == I Need Help == hey man, I was wondering if you knew how to help me I was doing the guest appearances thing on Krizz Kaliko. and there was like a couple songs in a row that had no album so I put rowspan=``3``\| but that fucks it all up, like it doesnt do the N/A thing its supposed to do, do you know what I'm doing wrong?`	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
612,921,110	== Cesc Fabregas == I see it's been changed that he now plays for Chelsea. Looks like I was right all along? how do you like that you little bitch? I was right and you were wrong.	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
612,921,228	== Cesc Fabregas == I see it's been changed that he now plays for Chelsea. Looks like I was right all along, how do you like that you little bitch? I was right and you were wrong.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
612,923,409	` : Undoing another editor's ``work``? What ``work`` do you mean? It is the other way around. ... `	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
612,925,142	== Table == # split the table into two: x86 and x86-64 instruction set so we can remove this from the table and also mention all the supported extensions (MMX, etc.) # remove the marketing names for models and platforms and what not, they are only misleading # we should mention, that some SoCs contain an LTE modem from intel	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
612,934,624	::Nice beginning! For improving the article, you should read the major paper on this group (access is free): ::Moravec & de Buron - A synthesis of our current knowledge of philometrid nematodes, a group of increasingly important fish parasites. PDF ::	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
612,936,342	thanks a lot man, you dont know how long thats been fuckin with my head	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
612,945,431	` __TOC__ This extreme merging, conducted by Jguk does not make sense, and the article is becoming unreadable. I agree that it is a positive move to add text under the headers, but now, except for the history section, it is just too much. Let's partly de-merge. ==Economy & notes - CONTRADICTION! == There's a contradiction: Economy: ``Tourism is a key industry, with most tourists visiting from the United States.`` Notes: ``Most tourists DO NOT come from the US but from France and the rest of Europe.`` Could someone with proper knowledge fix this? :This should be better. The numbers are from 1998; has anyone got more recent ones? == Proposed WikiProject == There is now a proposed WikiProject for the Caribbean area, including Guadeloupe, at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#Caribbean. Interested parties should add their names there so we can determine if there is enough interest to start such a project in earnest. Thank you for your attention. == Religion == There must be a mistake with the religion section. The percentages add up to more than 100, and it doesn't even include ``no religion``. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by . Is it possible that 'Jehovah's Witness' may fall under the category of 'Protestant' making the percentages add up to exactly 100. (Although not accounting for people with no religion) ( ) At further looking into religion, the French article quotes differing numbers than the English version, with Roman Catholic at 94%, Hindu/African at 3%, Jehovah's witness at 2% and Protestant at 1%. If anyone knows the actual numbers, please post them. ( ) Why are Hinduism and African Mythology lumped together in this section. They have utterly no relation with each other at all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by == Flag? == What's wrong with putting up the unofficial flag if it's explicitly labeled ``unofficial flag? The article just says 'Flag' and officially the French Flag is the official Flag of Guageloupe. ) Putting up a regional flag also pushes a seperatist party. Wikipedia, should remain neutral on political issue. For this reason, while Guadeloupe remains a French colony, the French flag should remain as the flag. This being said, it would be fine to showcase their regional flag elsewhere in the article. ( ) == Demography question == How is a positive population growth rate possible with 1.9 children born per women, and negative immigration ratio? == Football == A note was made that the football team had advanced to the CONCACAF Semifinals, but that has not happened yet. The match is still ongoing. Please don't make edits of this sort until the matches are final. == capital of guadeloupe == the capital of GUADELOUPE is PARIS (FRANCE). Basse-terre is the mayor city . == capital of guadeloupe == the Capital of GUADELOUPE is PARIS (FRANCE). Basse-terre is the mayor city . :As Guadeloupe is part of France, yes, Paris is the national capital, but Basse-Terre is Guadeloupe's regional capital, which is what the article is referring to. ::capital has no sense in these terms. The real word is prefecture (of region or of departement). France	2,014	true	article	random	dev	false
612,949,648	===Request for Closure=== I request consensus to close this RfC. It's been significantly less than 30 days, however, there has been a high degree of participation with ample discussion and it's clear (IMO) there will not be a consensus to delete the passage in question. Does anyone object?	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
612,977,978	You can cut it out with the spam. I only made one violation, get off your high horse.	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
612,978,125	== Satanizer == Thanks for the censorship!	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
612,999,992	:Never mind why - please stop it now. If you want to create articles about people who pass WP:BIO or WP:MUSICIAN, please do it at WP:AFC.	2,014	true	user	random	test	false
613,013,609	:For the record, Bishonen is all woman, not a him. Forgivable, I'm sure, but I thought I would just let you know. \| \| WER	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
613,014,442	` == Bad opening sentence? == ``The Accipitridae, one of the two major families within the order Accipitriformes (the diurnal birds of prey), ...`` This is plainly not true. It looks like someone has just replaced ``Falconiformes`` with ``Acciptriformes`` and not considered the effect on the meaning of the sentence. I'm assuming that ``two major families`` refers to Falconidae and Accipitridae. Obviously the Falconiformes are not members of Acciptriformes, and Acciptriformes is not synonymous with ``diurnal birds of prey``. Ok, research in molecular genetics is going to cause revisions and controversy in classification, but we need to be careful when making wholesale replacements of one term with another non-equivalent term! I'm going to try to reword that to recover its original meaning; I hope I don't put anyone's nose out of joint.`	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
613,023,858	:It's mentioned in the Hopalong Cassidy article because that type of info. is more pertinent to the character than the actor who played him, this being a bio.	2,014	false	article	blocked	test	false
613,033,879	is that I have read the policies and guides for conduct and I understand that I violated the policies set forth by Wikipedia by removing editing and and creating another account to continue my edits. I also may have spoke out of line with an editor. I take full responsibility for my actions and wish to apologize to the editors offended as well as to Wikipedia as a reliable encyclopedia and source of reference. I vow to never engage in such activity again. I take pride in Wikipedia and its platform and I sincerely apologize for my actions. }}	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
613,045,443	Totally laughable. Not only are you not right but purposeful ignorance is not an excuse. But hey great job using statistics to do anything but characterize what took place-pro liberal denialist in the making spinbot material. Maybe take a look at the graphs and explain how those with the most green do not have the highest averages or something mathematically impossible.	2,014	false	article	blocked	test	false
613,055,129	== Redoing Fonts Section == The Aegyptus link is broken, Noto is still not offered, NewGardiner.ttf does not cover entire range, JSeshFont needs a review. Of course best so far is the one embedded in U13000.pdf (official). Cheers.	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
613,064,958	Fuck off you nazi loving cunt	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	true
613,065,016	Fuck her right in the pussy	2,014	false	user	blocked	test	true
613,088,025	Ans. Non-rotating Skyhook.	2,014	false	article	blocked	dev	false
613,088,486	== You need a vacation from wikipedia == If you consider my comments to you and insult, you need time away. You are nit-picking at trival items. Go do something else for a while, then come back and edit. Otherwise, you are producing counter-forces. -Good Luck with your life.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
613,095,327	` I consider your choice of words, saying I ``brainlessly`` edit the article. According to rotten tomatoes, any movie with 57%-69% means mixed-TO-positive reviews, meaning reviews were originally mixed and later became more positive. The consensus on the site called the film, positively, ``an impressive entry to the Bond canon.`` I suggest you leave the article with the mixed-to-positive statement and not make a big deal about it. Just move on. - . 12:10 AM, 16 June, 2014 (UTC)`	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
613,100,224	== ric flairs gonna return dumbass!! == it has been reported that ric flair is gonna return to monday night june 16 hes gonna manag the miz so if you think im not gonna write again yo ass is wrong if you delete it again ima write again if you do delete it ill report you.	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	true
613,103,067	If it is a problem with me doing so and it is a violation I definitely will do so. May I ask as to why I am asked to not write on the topic? I thought that if I had the proper citations and information then it was fine to do so? If this is not true I vow to not attempt such writing again. I again would like to apologize to all I may have offended Respectfully	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
613,140,648	== Third column for Kurds in the infobox == Why is there a third column for Kurdish forces in the infobox? Has there been fighting between Kurds and ISF? If not, I don't see why a third column is necessary.	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
613,143,012	== Thanks == Thanks for the improvement of Born to Die as adding The Paradise edition entirely	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
613,147,960	Thank you again i truly wish only to be an assets respectfully & humbly	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
613,151,041	I sure will the last question I have is how do I proceed? my account says still blocked yet its allowing me to edit that page. I don't want to remove anything i'm not supposed to do i just wait for it to leave on its own.	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
613,153,963	Thank you, the page I'm trying to edit is Seven the General can I have some help from some one with it? I just put up my edits	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
613,160,003	` :::Aah. I see what happens. Thanks! I confused the original mesage with the ``being deleted message``. Lol. `	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
613,165,481	` :::I perfectly know Дорогой длинною / ``Those Were the Days`` was covered by hundreds of artists. But is it really necessary to mention them all ? Don't think so. `	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
613,173,779	` :::I don't see Dowd's article as a ``slam``; on the contrary, it's on-point criticism. From the article: ``Mr. Senor is emblematic of how much trouble America blundered into in the Middle East trillions wasted, so many lives and limbs lost because of how little we fathom the culture and sectarian politics. We're still stumbling in the dark. We not only don't know who our allies and enemies are, we don't know who our allies' and enemies' allies and enemies are. As the spokesman for Paul Bremer during the Iraq occupation, Mr. Senor helped perpetrate one of the biggest foreign policy bungles in U.S. history. The clueless desert viceroys summarily disbanded the Iraqi Army, forced de-Baathification, stood frozen in denial as thugs looted ministries and museums, deluded themselves about the growing insurgency and misled reporters with their Panglossian scenarios of progress.`` In light of last week's events (advances by Sunni terrorists in western Iraq, collapse of the Iraqi state army, Iranian revolutionary guards reinforcing Shiite Iraq militias) aren't Dowd's words truer than ever? I agree that Dowd can be snarky at times, but that doesn't preclude allowing her criticisms in Wikipedia articles. And I note she writes for the NY Times, a well-respected newspaper. `	2,014	true	article	random	dev	false
613,174,366	` :::Wasn't aware you would be ``working for me`` by adding a TOC - if that's your attitude then don't edit Wiki at all, because every edit benefits someone. Your adoption of that form of WP:BATTLEFIELD attitude is what I mean before, your 3RR block log shows your unwillingness to collaborate because you are self-serving rather than community-serving. No personal attacks from me either, only observation of your misdeeds and mass-scale bad faith reverts. Also you defined the editor who TOC'd the cat as an ``SPA``, but WP:SPA and Arbcoms specific def. on an SPA does not support your statement, so perhaps that's another example of your hostility towards IPs and new editors. You are very aggressive, and the ownership-like behaviour you have placed on these articles in your own interest rather than Wiki's is all too evident. There is no point my beating about the bush, I'm 100% honest, you're a bad faith editor who misrepresents policy, uses it to his advantage and ignores the wider benefits of doing something good and chooses to argue instead. I've remained perfectly civil with you, despite your intolerance and oppressive mannerisms. I don't work for you, but you chose to make my edits as a personal afront to your standards, rather than those set out by the community. You reverted 30+ articles without even knowing what you were reverting, the Eric Fleming article being a laughable example that you were bul reverting without a care for who or what you harmed. Foregone conclusion is simple for anyone to see, you don't like IPs/newbs so you WP:BITE them harshly, rudely and subjectively with undue force. `	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	true
613,176,306	` :::::Your ``whatever you say I do, you did first`` rhetoric is so childish, might I suggest you grow up and learn to accept when you are in the wrong. Your record isn't of interest to me, your discriminative behaviour is, I am the here and now, not your past record. You have a long block log too, with 3RR disruptions being a factor, it all balances out in the end: a leopard can't change its spots. `	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
613,177,885	: No, neither the front nor rear of a bike are MacPhersons. A MacPherson strut (as distinct from other struts) defines something about how track control is handled. This is inapplicable to bikes, therefor they're not MacPhersons. : Nor are bikes strut suspensions at all (we need a clear article on strut suspension but the accurate content we have had keeps getting wiped). The rear uses some form of swinging arm so that isn't a strut. The front isn't a strut because that's two coilovers, one each side, and braced at the headstock by the triple tree. The only strut suspension on bikes is that rarity (Cannondale mountain bikes being the only major user, maybe Mike Burroughs customs too) where there is a single-sided telescopic front fork and an overhung stub axle from it.	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
613,178,470	` *Dear TParis, thank you for the invitation; I am honored. Unfortunately, for the time being, I have put my encyclopedic aspirations behind me in order to focus on building a career as a composer. I might return to Wikipedia in the future. Many thanks, \| `	2,014	true	user	random	test	false
613,181,470	` Have you ever even seen a page on RT? You are making a big deal over a website that you couldn't even read. I don't want to get blocked; I want to do the right thing. Please do me a favor: go to the wikipedia page for the Date Night movie, read the reception, and see the rotten tomatoes page. I'd rather be intrigued to see if you removed EVERY ``mixed-to-positive`` use on a page. Go look on that page and get back to me. I'd be intrigued to see your reaction. - Theironminer 3:27 PM, 16 June, 2014`	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
613,184,020	` :::::Countless times if you prefer, but the idea is the same anyway this song has been covered over and over by multiples artists from all around the world. As you suggested, adding one ``notable`` example of each non-English language version of the song would be enough to show how famous/influential is the song. :::::In a bit of hurry ? Not really. I simply wanted to clean this section up to reduce its length, nothing else. So I chose removing artists without a Wikipedia article. On the other hand, I don't think adding extra tags would be appropriate as there's already a ``Refimprove`` tag at the top of the section since July 2013. The best thing to do is to add sources (as reliable as possible). If you can do so then go ahead. I can help you as far as I can but I'm not sure it would be possible to find a source for each artist. `	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
613,185,655	== Jewish? == How so?	2,014	false	article	blocked	dev	false
613,188,992	And DON'T mess with my articles like Charlie Countryman. You just looked at that article just to tick me off because I was. That's an awful way to handle this issue. I like to share stories to the world like that movie, it makes me feel good. And when you go through it and say stuff about it, then you have a problem and you need help. Please leave my other edits out of this.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
613,192,006	First of all, I know that it's free to edit. I've heard that a million times and I meant to say my article as in my edits, not my personal article. Second, I said I'm American because you claim you're from London, and I figure that there's different things you see in London that are different from what Americans see, thus making you have negative feelings for the edit (not sure if my theory is right, I'm just thinking that). Third, have you ever seen Charlie Countryman? I remember every moment in that movie and perfectly plotted it on the article, despite a few misunderstandings. If you could give a list of what I screwed up then I would understand. On top of all that, I DON'T want to argue about this, I just want to deal with my more important personal issues and go back to watching 24. So if we both don't like each other's edits, I have a solution that HAS to work for both of us. Please deliver your feedback after you see the edit. - Theironminer 4:52 PM, 16 June, 2014	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
613,199,034	So you reported me for trying to stop this argument. Very clever, boy. I've had no choice but to do the same. - Theironminer 5:50 PM, 16 June, 2014	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
613,201,102	= You need time off = It's apparent from other comments being left on your talk page, and your responses, that you should NOT be editing at this time. I don't have time to continue an on-going response, but you should seriously consider stepping away. FYI:Currently, WP has no way to leave you a personal message, else I would NOT be so Terse. -Good Luck.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
613,203,357	:: I'll keep that in mind. Thanks.	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
613,205,733	` == Lead needs to meet MOS standards == As it stands, the lead breaks MOS in several major ways: * MOS:INTRO#Introductory text - In that is does not ``briefly summarize the most important points covered in an article in such a way that it can stand on its own as a concise version of the article``. * MOS:INTRO#Relative emphasis - In that it gives WP:UNDUE emphasis to male rape in the UK, yet section in ``Prevalence`` covers 6 countries from which other examples could have been given. To quote MOS, ``emphasis given to material should reflect its relative importance to the subject`` – male rape in the UK is no more important that in any other country in the world, therefore it should not be used as a singular example because this does not represent a worldwide view, particularly as anything related to anal sex differs per culture, religion and by law. * The examples break the MOS:INTRO#Provide an accessible overview guideline which states: ``Do not hint at startling facts without describing them.`` The UK percentages are quoted without sufficient background to explain their relevancy this early in the article, there is no context because the lead is very short and uninformative. * MOS:INTRO#Relative emphasis - ``Significant information should not appear in the lead if it is not covered in the remainder of the article`` – the stated UK <3% and <5% figures are not mentioned in Male rape#United Kingdom, which would be a more appropriate place to account for these percentages, than in the lead in this disconnected manner. The lead needs rewriting be someone who has contributed to this article and knows the sources well, it should be much longer based on the article's current length, it should be balanced and not given to undue examples from cherry-picked county data, per WP:NPOV. It needs to give a concise overview of the topic, rather than focusing on too many examples, to avoid clutter. `	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
613,222,921	:It was in the book. Source updated.	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
613,224,302	: The first ref doesn't appear to be a RS, the other three simply indicate that he takes free kicks, and advance the SYNTHESIS point, but together it might be enough, thanks.	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
613,290,612	... Instead of the Juros	2,014	true	user	random	test	false
613,295,848	is this link a good source: http://ren-files.webs.com/news_2012.htm	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
613,295,922	. deadly radiation may cause human extinction!!!	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
613,296,560	== citation needed == is this link a good source: http://ren-files.webs.com/news_2012.htm	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
613,307,956	*Support exactly as nom says.	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
613,318,886	== Stop == Stop messing with my article	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
613,326,344	Below is copied from my . Dear Mr. Jowan, A gentleman by the name of Wood from Exeter university is to visit me at Helston museum next Tuesday to discuss the formation of the Loe Bar off Helston; and during the next two weeks I am planning to visit the records office in Old County Hall Truro to search for any records of the findings of shipping slipways whilst excavating under St. Johns Road, Helston, that was recorded in the local newspapers at the time, in the early 1980s. It was from their explorations that the common notion of Helston being a port was established. However, there is definitely more truth in the fact that Loe Bar could not have blocked the Ria until well after 1014: it was much smaller in mediaeval times. Toy's History of Helston pp. 381 to 385. :I look forward to seeing some reliable references for any harbour. ~~~~	2,014	true	article	random	test	false
613,329,736	:Mea culps - now fixed. Was the Herts one.	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
613,330,728	` ::You don't have to be condescending. I know what references are and I clicked through them; they were, however, NOT about Sara Flounders. You personally have drawn a conclusion that she is a fringe ``leftist`` journalist, but this is obviously your own opinion, as is your view of the IAC. It's obvious that you have a personal bias about the subject. All I'm trying to contribute to the article is that the cited numbers should not be taken as cold hard fact, and that there were dissenting opinions about the methods used to arrive at those numbers. So, right now as I see it, you haven't shown anything to substantiate your claim that Sara Flounders is not a worthy source for Wikipedia. Before I edit and re-post to the article, have a look at this paper as well and offer your thoughts on whether its ``worthy`` of this page. http://unconqueredbosnia.tripod.com/Balk8.html Thanks `	2,014	true	article	random	dev	false
613,332,177	== Good conisder it Harassment! == Get others involved. Then perhaps you'll see the truth.	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
613,335,809	::::: Very true! Especially when there are ample examples of slights one does _not_ have to infer. Just trip lightly down Greg's maths and logic editing history (Theorem is an excellent starting place) to see that this is far from the first time that Greg has demonstrated an inability and/or unwillingness to edit in a collegial, collaborative manner (not to mention issues of competence). One hoped that he'd found a niche in fiddling with categories where he wouldn't do any damage but alas not. But, just like when Capone was nicked for tax evasion and not his numerous other crimes, one takes victory where one finds it. Good riddance.	2,014	false	user	blocked	test	false
613,336,984	- Theironminer - 5:13 PM, 17 June, 2014	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
613,337,853	As you may know, I am new to the site, and I'm suprised to be getting these punishments from not actually trying to cause harm to the QoS article. Just wanted to do what's right.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
613,340,580	I have already asked you once to add reference needed tags or improve articles yourself rather than just reverting changes, news sites ARE credible sources whether you think they are or not. After I asked this of you, instead you hunted down another article, this time one I had created, instead of one I had edited, and proposed it for deletion. This is considered harassment. If you continue your current style of editing I will submit you to be blocked. I have added Predictive Index to the list for reinstatement. I assume you will not continue to demean my work by deleting for no other reason than you don't like my edits enough. You are not contributing to the community in a positive way, if you would like to talk about like an adult, please respond, don't just hunt and delete all my edits. I'm sick and tired of it, seriously, I've been a contributor for YEARS longer than you, and have never been treated with the disrespect that you have shown.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
613,359,862	= Parallel universes theory == Parallel universes theory I'm still working on this so please don't get mad when you prove me wrong. AU= (2R-1R +1R -) 2R + 1R =1/3R= 1/3 of a reality.SO, (EyMoC2)°°	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
613,366,151	== Semi-protected edit request on 18 June 2014 == I want to edit this article because I have more information that needs to be added. Kind Regards, Official Wiki Editor	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
613,368,305	:Meh. After reading it again and noticing grammatical errors (along with seeming out of place and irrelevant), I'm removing the last two paragraphs.	2,014	true	article	random	dev	false
613,373,261	OMG, I'm really hurt! You banned me from sitting in my basement all day working for free for Wikipedia like you guys do. I'm so depressed now!	2,014	false	user	blocked	test	false
613,373,543	June 2014 (UTC) : No problem! And don't worry if this section gets archived, we can always dig it out of the archives, or just continuing talking in a new section. 03:08, 18	2,014	true	user	random	test	false
613,376,828	:It's far from a default keep. Your message is incredibly premature. Even if you disagree with me, I'm disappointing you seek to circumvent the process so early in it.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
613,380,924	:Thank you. Its a small world, isn't it?	2,014	true	user	random	test	false
613,389,420	It was not an attack on someone, she is a personal friend of mine and i was doing it as a temporary gag. As soon as i was told it was going to be deleted, i deleted the contents accordingly. yes the page should have been deleted but it was not an attack on anyone.	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
613,407,734	::Denying the oppression that Arabs have inflicted on Jews for centuries is anti-Semitic and should not be tolerated on Wikipedia.	2,014	false	article	blocked	dev	false
613,407,805	Would you deny the Holocaust?	2,014	false	article	blocked	dev	false
613,408,286	`No, you are censoring Jewish human rights groups and whitewashing an article about Judeophobic ethnic cleansing committed by Arabs while at the same time adding Arab propaganda denying the real Nakba, the Jewish Nakba, in order to promote your Arab nationalist agenda. Wikipedia already has enough problems with its Israelophobic bias, so people like you and Zero0000 should stay off this article. I recognize that you two regularly write Arab nationalist propaganda for Wikipedia. And how is this an ``Arab conspiracy``? The Arabs make no attempt to conceal their desire to ``kick the Jews into the sea`` and destroy Israel. Denying this fact is equivalent to Holocaust denial. `	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
613,408,616	Benny Morris is a professor of Jewish history. You should not censor facts attributed to him.	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
613,436,334	== Megadeth == Hi, thank you for the message, yes can you discuss with me on the albums talk page cheers.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
613,436,509	== Genres == Hi, I think Thrash Metal should be kept because the album is thrash metal even if it is only in very small doses and the Sputnik Music review references it as such.	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
613,439,864	` == The name of the article == Greetings. I think that the name should be moved from Home Army to The Polish Home Army while ``Home Army`` is too general and might lead to some confusion. It's just my suggestion. `	2,014	true	article	blocked	dev	false
613,440,693	== Tadeusz Kobylinski == Kobylinski left Poland for Ancona in Italy. After service in the BRitish Army, he died in London in 1961.	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
613,444,613	Thank you for the information. This was just a suggestion. Regards.	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
613,447,059	:: Hi. Yes, I think it has due weight now, if that's what you mean. (Sidenote: Notability and due weight must not be mistaken. But I don't play dumb.) Best regards,	2,014	true	article	random	dev	false
613,452,369	Ok, if the talk page is where we can fix this whole thing, where is this so-called QoS talk page? - 1:17 PM, 18 June, 2014	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
613,452,956	`Perhaps I hope you have already read this while contributing to Wikipedia: ``When two editors disagree over what to do with an article, they must talk things through politely and rationally.`` That's how I wanted this to go down. Yet your reports and mistakening word choice didn't exactly make it possible to be that way. `	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
613,456,185	` ==Tables== In the discography should be countries if now has songs/albums in more countries. Black Widow (song) is a single to be released, why the song is in the section ``Other charted songs``? If in ``Other charted songs`` listed songs that are not 'singles'. `	2,014	true	article	blocked	test	false
613,458,213	Hi, could you please provide your opinion over at the Youthanasia talk page when you get chance, thank you.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
613,462,556	Yes but it is still there and acknowledged as being thrash even if at a very small level, same for the previous album there has been disagreements on that talk page about wether or not it is thrash or not. The reference acknowledges it as being thrash but more straight metal, it's not like I'm calling it a blues album or something stupid.	2,014	true	article	blocked	test	false
613,463,634	If he said thrash metal is absent then fair enough but he didn't he scarce meaning very little so it is still there. A sentence from the Cryptic Writings page (not written by me says) changes were met with mixed opinions from music critics, who noted the band moving away from their thrash metal roots. That backs up what I am saying that this has thrash on.	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
613,463,716	` :: kid, do you understand what the word ``may`` in English means? It does NOT mean ``must``. It means it could happen or not. It is better that it does not. Stop vandalising. :: When I have time I will go through all Serbian family names that redirect to a single individual and remove that stupidity (forced redirect link) and design a brief description that eaxch of those is a family name, such as for e.g. the name ``Smith`` in English.`	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
613,465,186	What a stupid argument you make, there is a difference from a band leaving their roots to playing a complete different genre of music, you completely looked last what I was trying to say, what I meant was if the reviewer was trying to make it clear that this was the first Megadeth album not to feature thrash metal songs he would have said thrash metal is absent not thrash metal Is scarce.	2,014	true	article	blocked	dev	true
613,467,029	` Yes and that is your personal view, what makes your's more important than mine.... Nothing that's what (and that is why I am waiting for other users to comment because one man's opinion should not be enough to dictate how Wikipedia works or is edited and I don't think you know what you mean why is my comment about if he said thrash metal is absent ``illogical``. `	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
613,472,706	==Confusions== There have been many confusions over which war Hannibal fought in, the main argument is; did he fight in the first or Second Punic War? I have recently edited the article to say that he fought in the Second, I know this from many sources and logically deduced that he could not have possible fought in the first Punic war. The First Punic War was 264 - 241 BC, Hannibal had only been born in 247 BC, and could not have commanded or fought at the age of six.	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
613,473,781	` == Semi-protected edit request on 9 March 2014 == Please change: officially the Republic of China (ROC; Chinese: 中華民國; pinyin: Zhōnghuá Mínguó), is a state in East Asia. to: officially the Republic of China (ROC; Chinese: 中華民國; pinyin: Zhōnghuá Mínguó), is a country in East Asia. also, please change: Neighboring states include the People's Republic of China to the west, Japan to the east and northeast, and the Philippines to the south. to: Neighboring countries include the People's Republic of China to the west, Japan to the east and northeast, and the Philippines to the south. According to the mandarin original text in the Taiwan Wikipedia page, Taiwan is a country and not a state. Also people's republic of china, Japan, Philippines are not states, they are countries. see below: 中華民國是位於東亞的民主共和國[參 9]，為亞洲現有最早實行共和立憲制度的國家[參 10]，成立於1912年1月1日，於1971年前被廣泛承認代表中國[注 11]，現今因主要國土位置或政治因素而被通稱為「臺灣」[參 2]。 : :I think you're confused in regards to the definition of state. I see that you live in California, United States, which furthers my assumptions. There is more to the word ``state`` than the ``US state`` (e.g. Texas, Missouri, etc) definition; a sovereign state is a political entity that we call Canada, or Serbia, or Cambodia. With this definition, China, Philippines and Japan are ``states``. The terms ``state``, ``nation`` and ``country`` refer to concepts which may be similar, however still have their small distinctions. In order to avoid ambiguity, it's better to refer to objects such as China, Japan, Britain, Russia, the United States, France, et cetera as sovereign states, instead of the two alternative terms. A sovereign state is largely defined in modern contexts based on Westphalian sovereignty, whilst the definitions of nation and country differ depending on various contexts.I wouldn't put too much thought on what the Chinese Wikipedia says on this issue. The Chinese language, like all languages, has its limitations in that there is no one-to-one correspondence with English political vocabulary. The English words ``state``, ``nation`` and ``country`` are all translated as ``國`` in Chinese, as Chinese does not make such a distinction. The Ministry of National Defense of the Republic of China is called ``中華民國國防部`` (國 = nation), the United Nations is called ``聯合國`` (國 = nation), the United States Department of State is called ``美國國務院`` (國 = state), the Commonwealth of Independent States is called ``獨立國家聯合體`` (國 = state), and the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries is called ``石油輸出國組織`` (國 = country). ••E `	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
613,477,770	` ::Most are now all better, I commented where I still have a few caveats. Once those are addressed, with a wee bit more on the lead once the body text is fixed, I'll probably be able to pass this. On your new material, is an ``umpire`` the same as an ``umpire`` in baseball or a sports referee - a rules-enforcing official? Perhaps wikilink the job? `	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
613,494,583	== Opinion polling for the New Zealand general election, 2014 == Thanks for all your work on this topic. I wonder if the graphs could be updated as there have now been several significant polls since they were last done. Unfortunately I have no idea how to update them and note you have previously done so. Keep up the good work.	2,014	true	user	random	dev	false
613,497,136	` :::::::::That is how they choose to describe themselves, consistent with how they are normally described in reliable sources. If you want to persuade them to change that description, then I suggest you contact them, but Wikipedia is not the place to correct common usage. Tell them you think it should be called ``the official website of the Monarchy/(Monarchies?) of 16 Commonwealth Realms.`` `	2,014	true	article	random	test	false

612,872,744

:Support. If you see anything that's worth salvaging from this page, feel free to merge it into the Cities Proper list and turn this page into a redirect. That is basically the outcome of the AfD discussion. Just be careful with the populations of the Chinese cities, as they usually govern many counties and county-level cities which should not be included in the city proper calculation. -

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

612,877,003

== Reculver == Hi - I've raised in more detail the issues around the use of National Archives notes as sources. I'm inclined to the view that they can't be relied apon as they are not true secondary sources, but I'm open to alternative arguments. I've raised it at the FAC talk page. You might want to invite others to engage. Even if these sources get rejected, they only marginally affect the article on Reculver, which i think should go through perhaps with one sentence and one footnote removed. Regards,

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

612,877,322

` (UTC) IMO, desktop environments like GNOME or KDE SC, provide an entire plethora of programs. I think the main problem is the distinction between the GUI of any program, which is composed of GUI widgets and works as part of a Windowing system and special programs like GNOME Panel, GNOME Shell, which can best be termed as ``graphical shells``. Some people call them UX. 11:02, 14 June 2014`

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

612,877,789

` (UTC) ::: Windows explorer is IMO file browser. But it could additionally be a window manager, compositor, etc. This additional functions would make it a graphical shell. 11:08, 14 June 2014`

2,014

true

article

blocked

test

false

612,881,648

REDIRECT Talk:2012 Viva World Cup

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

612,889,820

` :``Without explaining why?`` Please read history. `

2,014

true

user

random

test

false

612,918,783

` == I Need Help == hey man, I was wondering if you knew how to help me I was doing the guest appearances thing on Krizz Kaliko. and there was like a couple songs in a row that had no album so I put rowspan=``3``| but that fucks it all up, like it doesnt do the N/A thing its supposed to do, do you know what I'm doing wrong?`

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

612,921,110

== Cesc Fabregas == I see it's been changed that he now plays for Chelsea. Looks like I was right all along? how do you like that you little bitch? I was right and you were wrong.

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

612,921,228

== Cesc Fabregas == I see it's been changed that he now plays for Chelsea. Looks like I was right all along, how do you like that you little bitch? I was right and you were wrong.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

612,923,409

` : Undoing another editor's ``work``? What ``work`` do you mean? It is the other way around. ... `

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

612,925,142

== Table == # split the table into two: x86 and x86-64 instruction set so we can remove this from the table and also mention all the supported extensions (MMX, etc.) # remove the marketing names for models and platforms and what not, they are only misleading # we should mention, that some SoCs contain an LTE modem from intel

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

612,934,624

::Nice beginning! For improving the article, you should read the major paper on this group (access is free): ::Moravec & de Buron - A synthesis of our current knowledge of philometrid nematodes, a group of increasingly important fish parasites. PDF ::

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

612,936,342

thanks a lot man, you dont know how long thats been fuckin with my head

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

612,945,431

` __TOC__ This extreme merging, conducted by Jguk does not make sense, and the article is becoming unreadable. I agree that it is a positive move to add text under the headers, but now, except for the history section, it is just too much. Let's partly de-merge. ==Economy & notes - CONTRADICTION! == There's a contradiction: Economy: ``Tourism is a key industry, with most tourists visiting from the United States.`` Notes: ``Most tourists DO NOT come from the US but from France and the rest of Europe.`` Could someone with proper knowledge fix this? :This should be better. The numbers are from 1998; has anyone got more recent ones? == Proposed WikiProject == There is now a proposed WikiProject for the Caribbean area, including Guadeloupe, at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#Caribbean. Interested parties should add their names there so we can determine if there is enough interest to start such a project in earnest. Thank you for your attention. == Religion == There must be a mistake with the religion section. The percentages add up to more than 100, and it doesn't even include ``no religion``. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by . Is it possible that 'Jehovah's Witness' may fall under the category of 'Protestant' making the percentages add up to exactly 100. (Although not accounting for people with no religion) ( ) At further looking into religion, the French article quotes differing numbers than the English version, with Roman Catholic at 94%, Hindu/African at 3%, Jehovah's witness at 2% and Protestant at 1%. If anyone knows the actual numbers, please post them. ( ) Why are Hinduism and African Mythology lumped together in this section. They have utterly no relation with each other at all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by == Flag? == What's wrong with putting up the unofficial flag if it's explicitly labeled ``unofficial flag? The article just says 'Flag' and officially the French Flag is the official Flag of Guageloupe. ) Putting up a regional flag also pushes a seperatist party. Wikipedia, should remain neutral on political issue. For this reason, while Guadeloupe remains a French colony, the French flag should remain as the flag. This being said, it would be fine to showcase their regional flag elsewhere in the article. ( ) == Demography question == How is a positive population growth rate possible with 1.9 children born per women, and negative immigration ratio? == Football == A note was made that the football team had advanced to the CONCACAF Semifinals, but that has not happened yet. The match is still ongoing. Please don't make edits of this sort until the matches are final. == capital of guadeloupe == the capital of GUADELOUPE is PARIS (FRANCE). Basse-terre is the mayor city . == capital of guadeloupe == the Capital of GUADELOUPE is PARIS (FRANCE). Basse-terre is the mayor city . :As Guadeloupe is part of France, yes, Paris is the national capital, but Basse-Terre is Guadeloupe's regional capital, which is what the article is referring to. ::capital has no sense in these terms. The real word is prefecture (of region or of departement). France

2,014

true

article

random

dev

false

612,949,648

===Request for Closure=== I request consensus to close this RfC. It's been significantly less than 30 days, however, there has been a high degree of participation with ample discussion and it's clear (IMO) there will not be a consensus to delete the passage in question. Does anyone object?

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

612,977,978

You can cut it out with the spam. I only made one violation, get off your high horse.

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

612,978,125

== Satanizer == Thanks for the censorship!

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

612,999,992

:Never mind why - please stop it now. If you want to create articles about people who pass WP:BIO or WP:MUSICIAN, please do it at WP:AFC.

2,014

true

user

random

test

false

613,013,609

:For the record, Bishonen is all woman, not a him. Forgivable, I'm sure, but I thought I would just let you know. | | WER

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

613,014,442

` == Bad opening sentence? == ``The Accipitridae, one of the two major families within the order Accipitriformes (the diurnal birds of prey), ...`` This is plainly not true. It looks like someone has just replaced ``Falconiformes`` with ``Acciptriformes`` and not considered the effect on the meaning of the sentence. I'm assuming that ``two major families`` refers to Falconidae and Accipitridae. Obviously the Falconiformes are not members of Acciptriformes, and Acciptriformes is not synonymous with ``diurnal birds of prey``. Ok, research in molecular genetics is going to cause revisions and controversy in classification, but we need to be careful when making wholesale replacements of one term with another non-equivalent term! I'm going to try to reword that to recover its original meaning; I hope I don't put anyone's nose out of joint.`

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

613,023,858

:It's mentioned in the Hopalong Cassidy article because that type of info. is more pertinent to the character than the actor who played him, this being a bio.

2,014

false

article

blocked

test

false

613,033,879

is that I have read the policies and guides for conduct and I understand that I violated the policies set forth by Wikipedia by removing editing and and creating another account to continue my edits. I also may have spoke out of line with an editor. I take full responsibility for my actions and wish to apologize to the editors offended as well as to Wikipedia as a reliable encyclopedia and source of reference. I vow to never engage in such activity again. I take pride in Wikipedia and its platform and I sincerely apologize for my actions. }}

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

613,045,443

Totally laughable. Not only are you not right but purposeful ignorance is not an excuse. But hey great job using statistics to do anything but characterize what took place-pro liberal denialist in the making spinbot material. Maybe take a look at the graphs and explain how those with the most green do not have the highest averages or something mathematically impossible.

2,014

false

article

blocked

test

false

613,055,129

== Redoing Fonts Section == The Aegyptus link is broken, Noto is still not offered, NewGardiner.ttf does not cover entire range, JSeshFont needs a review. Of course best so far is the one embedded in U13000.pdf (official). Cheers.

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

613,064,958

Fuck off you nazi loving cunt

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

true

613,065,016

Fuck her right in the pussy

2,014

false

user

blocked

test

true

613,088,025

Ans. Non-rotating Skyhook.

2,014

false

article

blocked

dev

false

613,088,486

== You need a vacation from wikipedia == If you consider my comments to you and insult, you need time away. You are nit-picking at trival items. Go do something else for a while, then come back and edit. Otherwise, you are producing counter-forces. -Good Luck with your life.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

613,095,327

` I consider your choice of words, saying I ``brainlessly`` edit the article. According to rotten tomatoes, any movie with 57%-69% means mixed-TO-positive reviews, meaning reviews were originally mixed and later became more positive. The consensus on the site called the film, positively, ``an impressive entry to the Bond canon.`` I suggest you leave the article with the mixed-to-positive statement and not make a big deal about it. Just move on. - . 12:10 AM, 16 June, 2014 (UTC)`

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

613,100,224

== ric flairs gonna return dumbass!! == it has been reported that ric flair is gonna return to monday night june 16 hes gonna manag the miz so if you think im not gonna write again yo ass is wrong if you delete it again ima write again if you do delete it ill report you.

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

true

613,103,067

If it is a problem with me doing so and it is a violation I definitely will do so. May I ask as to why I am asked to not write on the topic? I thought that if I had the proper citations and information then it was fine to do so? If this is not true I vow to not attempt such writing again. I again would like to apologize to all I may have offended Respectfully

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

613,140,648

== Third column for Kurds in the infobox == Why is there a third column for Kurdish forces in the infobox? Has there been fighting between Kurds and ISF? If not, I don't see why a third column is necessary.

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

613,143,012

== Thanks == Thanks for the improvement of Born to Die as adding The Paradise edition entirely

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

613,147,960

Thank you again i truly wish only to be an assets respectfully & humbly

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

613,151,041

I sure will the last question I have is how do I proceed? my account says still blocked yet its allowing me to edit that page. I don't want to remove anything i'm not supposed to do i just wait for it to leave on its own.

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

613,153,963

Thank you, the page I'm trying to edit is Seven the General can I have some help from some one with it? I just put up my edits

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

613,160,003

` :::Aah. I see what happens. Thanks! I confused the original mesage with the ``being deleted message``. Lol. `

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

613,165,481

` :::I perfectly know Дорогой длинною / ``Those Were the Days`` was covered by hundreds of artists. But is it really necessary to mention them all ? Don't think so. `

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

613,173,779

` :::I don't see Dowd's article as a ``slam``; on the contrary, it's on-point criticism. From the article: ``Mr. Senor is emblematic of how much trouble America blundered into in the Middle East trillions wasted, so many lives and limbs lost because of how little we fathom the culture and sectarian politics. We're still stumbling in the dark. We not only don't know who our allies and enemies are, we don't know who our allies' and enemies' allies and enemies are. As the spokesman for Paul Bremer during the Iraq occupation, Mr. Senor helped perpetrate one of the biggest foreign policy bungles in U.S. history. The clueless desert viceroys summarily disbanded the Iraqi Army, forced de-Baathification, stood frozen in denial as thugs looted ministries and museums, deluded themselves about the growing insurgency and misled reporters with their Panglossian scenarios of progress.`` In light of last week's events (advances by Sunni terrorists in western Iraq, collapse of the Iraqi state army, Iranian revolutionary guards reinforcing Shiite Iraq militias) aren't Dowd's words truer than ever? I agree that Dowd can be snarky at times, but that doesn't preclude allowing her criticisms in Wikipedia articles. And I note she writes for the NY Times, a well-respected newspaper. `

2,014

true

article

random

dev

false

613,174,366

` :::Wasn't aware you would be ``working for me`` by adding a TOC - if that's your attitude then don't edit Wiki at all, because every edit benefits someone. Your adoption of that form of WP:BATTLEFIELD attitude is what I mean before, your 3RR block log shows your unwillingness to collaborate because you are self-serving rather than community-serving. No personal attacks from me either, only observation of your misdeeds and mass-scale bad faith reverts. Also you defined the editor who TOC'd the cat as an ``SPA``, but WP:SPA and Arbcoms specific def. on an SPA does not support your statement, so perhaps that's another example of your hostility towards IPs and new editors. You are very aggressive, and the ownership-like behaviour you have placed on these articles in your own interest rather than Wiki's is all too evident. There is no point my beating about the bush, I'm 100% honest, you're a bad faith editor who misrepresents policy, uses it to his advantage and ignores the wider benefits of doing something good and chooses to argue instead. I've remained perfectly civil with you, despite your intolerance and oppressive mannerisms. I don't work for you, but you chose to make my edits as a personal afront to your standards, rather than those set out by the community. You reverted 30+ articles without even knowing what you were reverting, the Eric Fleming article being a laughable example that you were bul reverting without a care for who or what you harmed. Foregone conclusion is simple for anyone to see, you don't like IPs/newbs so you WP:BITE them harshly, rudely and subjectively with undue force. `

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

true

613,176,306

` :::::Your ``whatever you say I do, you did first`` rhetoric is so childish, might I suggest you grow up and learn to accept when you are in the wrong. Your record isn't of interest to me, your discriminative behaviour is, I am the here and now, not your past record. You have a long block log too, with 3RR disruptions being a factor, it all balances out in the end: a leopard can't change its spots. `

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

613,177,885

: No, neither the front nor rear of a bike are MacPhersons. A MacPherson strut (as distinct from other struts) defines something about how track control is handled. This is inapplicable to bikes, therefor they're not MacPhersons. : Nor are bikes strut suspensions at all (we need a clear article on strut suspension but the accurate content we have had keeps getting wiped). The rear uses some form of swinging arm so that isn't a strut. The front isn't a strut because that's two coilovers, one each side, and braced at the headstock by the triple tree. The only strut suspension on bikes is that rarity (Cannondale mountain bikes being the only major user, maybe Mike Burroughs customs too) where there is a single-sided telescopic front fork and an overhung stub axle from it.

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

613,178,470

` *Dear TParis, thank you for the invitation; I am honored. Unfortunately, for the time being, I have put my encyclopedic aspirations behind me in order to focus on building a career as a composer. I might return to Wikipedia in the future. Many thanks, | `

2,014

true

user

random

test

false

613,181,470

` Have you ever even seen a page on RT? You are making a big deal over a website that you couldn't even read. I don't want to get blocked; I want to do the right thing. Please do me a favor: go to the wikipedia page for the Date Night movie, read the reception, and see the rotten tomatoes page. I'd rather be intrigued to see if you removed EVERY ``mixed-to-positive`` use on a page. Go look on that page and get back to me. I'd be intrigued to see your reaction. - Theironminer 3:27 PM, 16 June, 2014`

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

613,184,020

` :::::Countless times if you prefer, but the idea is the same anyway this song has been covered over and over by multiples artists from all around the world. As you suggested, adding one ``notable`` example of each non-English language version of the song would be enough to show how famous/influential is the song. :::::In a bit of hurry ? Not really. I simply wanted to clean this section up to reduce its length, nothing else. So I chose removing artists without a Wikipedia article. On the other hand, I don't think adding extra tags would be appropriate as there's already a ``Refimprove`` tag at the top of the section since July 2013. The best thing to do is to add sources (as reliable as possible). If you can do so then go ahead. I can help you as far as I can but I'm not sure it would be possible to find a source for each artist. `

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

613,185,655

== Jewish? == How so?

2,014

false

article

blocked

dev

false

613,188,992

And DON'T mess with my articles like Charlie Countryman. You just looked at that article just to tick me off because I was. That's an awful way to handle this issue. I like to share stories to the world like that movie, it makes me feel good. And when you go through it and say stuff about it, then you have a problem and you need help. Please leave my other edits out of this.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

613,192,006

First of all, I know that it's free to edit. I've heard that a million times and I meant to say my article as in my edits, not my personal article. Second, I said I'm American because you claim you're from London, and I figure that there's different things you see in London that are different from what Americans see, thus making you have negative feelings for the edit (not sure if my theory is right, I'm just thinking that). Third, have you ever seen Charlie Countryman? I remember every moment in that movie and perfectly plotted it on the article, despite a few misunderstandings. If you could give a list of what I screwed up then I would understand. On top of all that, I DON'T want to argue about this, I just want to deal with my more important personal issues and go back to watching 24. So if we both don't like each other's edits, I have a solution that HAS to work for both of us. Please deliver your feedback after you see the edit. - Theironminer 4:52 PM, 16 June, 2014

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

613,199,034

So you reported me for trying to stop this argument. Very clever, boy. I've had no choice but to do the same. - Theironminer 5:50 PM, 16 June, 2014

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

613,201,102

= You need time off = It's apparent from other comments being left on your talk page, and your responses, that you should NOT be editing at this time. I don't have time to continue an on-going response, but you should seriously consider stepping away. FYI:Currently, WP has no way to leave you a personal message, else I would NOT be so Terse. -Good Luck.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

613,203,357

:: I'll keep that in mind. Thanks.

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

613,205,733

` == Lead needs to meet MOS standards == As it stands, the lead breaks MOS in several major ways: * MOS:INTRO#Introductory text - In that is does not ``briefly summarize the most important points covered in an article in such a way that it can stand on its own as a concise version of the article``. * MOS:INTRO#Relative emphasis - In that it gives WP:UNDUE emphasis to male rape in the UK, yet section in ``Prevalence`` covers 6 countries from which other examples could have been given. To quote MOS, ``emphasis given to material should reflect its relative importance to the subject`` – male rape in the UK is no more important that in any other country in the world, therefore it should not be used as a singular example because this does not represent a worldwide view, particularly as anything related to anal sex differs per culture, religion and by law. * The examples break the MOS:INTRO#Provide an accessible overview guideline which states: ``Do not hint at startling facts without describing them.`` The UK percentages are quoted without sufficient background to explain their relevancy this early in the article, there is no context because the lead is very short and uninformative. * MOS:INTRO#Relative emphasis - ``Significant information should not appear in the lead if it is not covered in the remainder of the article`` – the stated UK <3% and <5% figures are not mentioned in Male rape#United Kingdom, which would be a more appropriate place to account for these percentages, than in the lead in this disconnected manner. The lead needs rewriting be someone who has contributed to this article and knows the sources well, it should be much longer based on the article's current length, it should be balanced and not given to undue examples from cherry-picked county data, per WP:NPOV. It needs to give a concise overview of the topic, rather than focusing on too many examples, to avoid clutter. `

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

613,222,921

:It was in the book. Source updated.

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

613,224,302

: The first ref doesn't appear to be a RS, the other three simply indicate that he takes free kicks, and advance the SYNTHESIS point, but together it might be enough, thanks.

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

613,290,612

... Instead of the Juros

2,014

true

user

random

test

false

613,295,848

is this link a good source: http://ren-files.webs.com/news_2012.htm

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

613,295,922

. deadly radiation may cause human extinction!!!

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

613,296,560

== citation needed == is this link a good source: http://ren-files.webs.com/news_2012.htm

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

613,307,956

*Support exactly as nom says.

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

613,318,886

== Stop == Stop messing with my article

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

613,326,344

Below is copied from my . Dear Mr. Jowan, A gentleman by the name of Wood from Exeter university is to visit me at Helston museum next Tuesday to discuss the formation of the Loe Bar off Helston; and during the next two weeks I am planning to visit the records office in Old County Hall Truro to search for any records of the findings of shipping slipways whilst excavating under St. Johns Road, Helston, that was recorded in the local newspapers at the time, in the early 1980s. It was from their explorations that the common notion of Helston being a port was established. However, there is definitely more truth in the fact that Loe Bar could not have blocked the Ria until well after 1014: it was much smaller in mediaeval times. Toy's History of Helston pp. 381 to 385. :I look forward to seeing some reliable references for any harbour. ~~~~

2,014

true

article

random

test

false

613,329,736

:Mea culps - now fixed. Was the Herts one.

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

613,330,728

` ::You don't have to be condescending. I know what references are and I clicked through them; they were, however, NOT about Sara Flounders. You personally have drawn a conclusion that she is a fringe ``leftist`` journalist, but this is obviously your own opinion, as is your view of the IAC. It's obvious that you have a personal bias about the subject. All I'm trying to contribute to the article is that the cited numbers should not be taken as cold hard fact, and that there were dissenting opinions about the methods used to arrive at those numbers. So, right now as I see it, you haven't shown anything to substantiate your claim that Sara Flounders is not a worthy source for Wikipedia. Before I edit and re-post to the article, have a look at this paper as well and offer your thoughts on whether its ``worthy`` of this page. http://unconqueredbosnia.tripod.com/Balk8.html Thanks `

2,014

true

article

random

dev

false

613,332,177

== Good conisder it Harassment! == Get others involved. Then perhaps you'll see the truth.

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

613,335,809

::::: Very true! Especially when there are ample examples of slights one does _not_ have to infer. Just trip lightly down Greg's maths and logic editing history (Theorem is an excellent starting place) to see that this is far from the first time that Greg has demonstrated an inability and/or unwillingness to edit in a collegial, collaborative manner (not to mention issues of competence). One hoped that he'd found a niche in fiddling with categories where he wouldn't do any damage but alas not. But, just like when Capone was nicked for tax evasion and not his numerous other crimes, one takes victory where one finds it. Good riddance.

2,014

false

user

blocked

test

false

613,336,984

- Theironminer - 5:13 PM, 17 June, 2014

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

613,337,853

As you may know, I am new to the site, and I'm suprised to be getting these punishments from not actually trying to cause harm to the QoS article. Just wanted to do what's right.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

613,340,580

I have already asked you once to add reference needed tags or improve articles yourself rather than just reverting changes, news sites ARE credible sources whether you think they are or not. After I asked this of you, instead you hunted down another article, this time one I had created, instead of one I had edited, and proposed it for deletion. This is considered harassment. If you continue your current style of editing I will submit you to be blocked. I have added Predictive Index to the list for reinstatement. I assume you will not continue to demean my work by deleting for no other reason than you don't like my edits enough. You are not contributing to the community in a positive way, if you would like to talk about like an adult, please respond, don't just hunt and delete all my edits. I'm sick and tired of it, seriously, I've been a contributor for YEARS longer than you, and have never been treated with the disrespect that you have shown.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

613,359,862

= Parallel universes theory == Parallel universes theory I'm still working on this so please don't get mad when you prove me wrong. AU= (2R-1R +1R -) 2R + 1R =1/3R= 1/3 of a reality.SO, (EyMoC2)°°

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

613,366,151

== Semi-protected edit request on 18 June 2014 == I want to edit this article because I have more information that needs to be added. Kind Regards, Official Wiki Editor

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

613,368,305

:Meh. After reading it again and noticing grammatical errors (along with seeming out of place and irrelevant), I'm removing the last two paragraphs.

2,014

true

article

random

dev

false

613,373,261

OMG, I'm really hurt! You banned me from sitting in my basement all day working for free for Wikipedia like you guys do. I'm so depressed now!

2,014

false

user

blocked

test

false

613,373,543

June 2014 (UTC) : No problem! And don't worry if this section gets archived, we can always dig it out of the archives, or just continuing talking in a new section. 03:08, 18

2,014

true

user

random

test

false

613,376,828

:It's far from a default keep. Your message is incredibly premature. Even if you disagree with me, I'm disappointing you seek to circumvent the process so early in it.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

613,380,924

:Thank you. Its a small world, isn't it?

2,014

true

user

random

test

false

613,389,420

It was not an attack on someone, she is a personal friend of mine and i was doing it as a temporary gag. As soon as i was told it was going to be deleted, i deleted the contents accordingly. yes the page should have been deleted but it was not an attack on anyone.

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

613,407,734

::Denying the oppression that Arabs have inflicted on Jews for centuries is anti-Semitic and should not be tolerated on Wikipedia.

2,014

false

article

blocked

dev

false

613,407,805

Would you deny the Holocaust?

2,014

false

article

blocked

dev

false

613,408,286

`No, you are censoring Jewish human rights groups and whitewashing an article about Judeophobic ethnic cleansing committed by Arabs while at the same time adding Arab propaganda denying the real Nakba, the Jewish Nakba, in order to promote your Arab nationalist agenda. Wikipedia already has enough problems with its Israelophobic bias, so people like you and Zero0000 should stay off this article. I recognize that you two regularly write Arab nationalist propaganda for Wikipedia. And how is this an ``Arab conspiracy``? The Arabs make no attempt to conceal their desire to ``kick the Jews into the sea`` and destroy Israel. Denying this fact is equivalent to Holocaust denial. `

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

613,408,616

Benny Morris is a professor of Jewish history. You should not censor facts attributed to him.

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

613,436,334

== Megadeth == Hi, thank you for the message, yes can you discuss with me on the albums talk page cheers.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

613,436,509

== Genres == Hi, I think Thrash Metal should be kept because the album is thrash metal even if it is only in very small doses and the Sputnik Music review references it as such.

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

613,439,864

` == The name of the article == Greetings. I think that the name should be moved from Home Army to The Polish Home Army while ``Home Army`` is too general and might lead to some confusion. It's just my suggestion. `

2,014

true

article

blocked

dev

false

613,440,693

== Tadeusz Kobylinski == Kobylinski left Poland for Ancona in Italy. After service in the BRitish Army, he died in London in 1961.

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

613,444,613

Thank you for the information. This was just a suggestion. Regards.

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

613,447,059

:: Hi. Yes, I think it has due weight now, if that's what you mean. (Sidenote: Notability and due weight must not be mistaken. But I don't play dumb.) Best regards,

2,014

true

article

random

dev

false

613,452,369

Ok, if the talk page is where we can fix this whole thing, where is this so-called QoS talk page? - 1:17 PM, 18 June, 2014

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

613,452,956

`Perhaps I hope you have already read this while contributing to Wikipedia: ``When two editors disagree over what to do with an article, they must talk things through politely and rationally.`` That's how I wanted this to go down. Yet your reports and mistakening word choice didn't exactly make it possible to be that way. `

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

613,456,185

` ==Tables== In the discography should be countries if now has songs/albums in more countries. Black Widow (song) is a single to be released, why the song is in the section ``Other charted songs``? If in ``Other charted songs`` listed songs that are not 'singles'. `

2,014

true

article

blocked

test

false

613,458,213

Hi, could you please provide your opinion over at the Youthanasia talk page when you get chance, thank you.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

613,462,556

Yes but it is still there and acknowledged as being thrash even if at a very small level, same for the previous album there has been disagreements on that talk page about wether or not it is thrash or not. The reference acknowledges it as being thrash but more straight metal, it's not like I'm calling it a blues album or something stupid.

2,014

true

article

blocked

test

false

613,463,634

If he said thrash metal is absent then fair enough but he didn't he scarce meaning very little so it is still there. A sentence from the Cryptic Writings page (not written by me says) changes were met with mixed opinions from music critics, who noted the band moving away from their thrash metal roots. That backs up what I am saying that this has thrash on.

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

613,463,716

` :: kid, do you understand what the word ``may`` in English means? It does NOT mean ``must``. It means it could happen or not. It is better that it does not. Stop vandalising. :: When I have time I will go through all Serbian family names that redirect to a single individual and remove that stupidity (forced redirect link) and design a brief description that eaxch of those is a family name, such as for e.g. the name ``Smith`` in English.`

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

613,465,186

What a stupid argument you make, there is a difference from a band leaving their roots to playing a complete different genre of music, you completely looked last what I was trying to say, what I meant was if the reviewer was trying to make it clear that this was the first Megadeth album not to feature thrash metal songs he would have said thrash metal is absent not thrash metal Is scarce.

2,014

true

article

blocked

dev

true

613,467,029

` Yes and that is your personal view, what makes your's more important than mine.... Nothing that's what (and that is why I am waiting for other users to comment because one man's opinion should not be enough to dictate how Wikipedia works or is edited and I don't think you know what you mean why is my comment about if he said thrash metal is absent ``illogical``. `

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

613,472,706

==Confusions== There have been many confusions over which war Hannibal fought in, the main argument is; did he fight in the first or Second Punic War? I have recently edited the article to say that he fought in the Second, I know this from many sources and logically deduced that he could not have possible fought in the first Punic war. The First Punic War was 264 - 241 BC, Hannibal had only been born in 247 BC, and could not have commanded or fought at the age of six.

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

613,473,781

` == Semi-protected edit request on 9 March 2014 == Please change: officially the Republic of China (ROC; Chinese: 中華民國; pinyin: Zhōnghuá Mínguó), is a state in East Asia. to: officially the Republic of China (ROC; Chinese: 中華民國; pinyin: Zhōnghuá Mínguó), is a country in East Asia. also, please change: Neighboring states include the People's Republic of China to the west, Japan to the east and northeast, and the Philippines to the south. to: Neighboring countries include the People's Republic of China to the west, Japan to the east and northeast, and the Philippines to the south. According to the mandarin original text in the Taiwan Wikipedia page, Taiwan is a country and not a state. Also people's republic of china, Japan, Philippines are not states, they are countries. see below: 中華民國是位於東亞的民主共和國[參 9]，為亞洲現有最早實行共和立憲制度的國家[參 10]，成立於1912年1月1日，於1971年前被廣泛承認代表中國[注 11]，現今因主要國土位置或政治因素而被通稱為「臺灣」[參 2]。 : :I think you're confused in regards to the definition of state. I see that you live in California, United States, which furthers my assumptions. There is more to the word ``state`` than the ``US state`` (e.g. Texas, Missouri, etc) definition; a sovereign state is a political entity that we call Canada, or Serbia, or Cambodia. With this definition, China, Philippines and Japan are ``states``. The terms ``state``, ``nation`` and ``country`` refer to concepts which may be similar, however still have their small distinctions. In order to avoid ambiguity, it's better to refer to objects such as China, Japan, Britain, Russia, the United States, France, et cetera as sovereign states, instead of the two alternative terms. A sovereign state is largely defined in modern contexts based on Westphalian sovereignty, whilst the definitions of nation and country differ depending on various contexts.I wouldn't put too much thought on what the Chinese Wikipedia says on this issue. The Chinese language, like all languages, has its limitations in that there is no one-to-one correspondence with English political vocabulary. The English words ``state``, ``nation`` and ``country`` are all translated as ``國`` in Chinese, as Chinese does not make such a distinction. The Ministry of National Defense of the Republic of China is called ``中華民國國防部`` (國 = nation), the United Nations is called ``聯合國`` (國 = nation), the United States Department of State is called ``美國國務院`` (國 = state), the Commonwealth of Independent States is called ``獨立國家聯合體`` (國 = state), and the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries is called ``石油輸出國組織`` (國 = country). ••E `

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

613,477,770

` ::Most are now all better, I commented where I still have a few caveats. Once those are addressed, with a wee bit more on the lead once the body text is fixed, I'll probably be able to pass this. On your new material, is an ``umpire`` the same as an ``umpire`` in baseball or a sports referee - a rules-enforcing official? Perhaps wikilink the job? `

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

613,494,583

== Opinion polling for the New Zealand general election, 2014 == Thanks for all your work on this topic. I wonder if the graphs could be updated as there have now been several significant polls since they were last done. Unfortunately I have no idea how to update them and note you have previously done so. Keep up the good work.

2,014

true

user

random

dev

false

613,497,136

` :::::::::That is how they choose to describe themselves, consistent with how they are normally described in reliable sources. If you want to persuade them to change that description, then I suggest you contact them, but Wikipedia is not the place to correct common usage. Tell them you think it should be called ``the official website of the Monarchy/(Monarchies?) of 16 Commonwealth Realms.`` `

2,014

true

article

random

test

false