dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
50,175,747	`Thank you for experimenting with the page Sewage treatment on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. e `	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
50,176,212	Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! /\@	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
50,181,961	` == DVD? == Chatting: Now, I'm afraid my Japanese sucks, but unless it's gotten horribly worse today, it looks like the first DVD volume is out tomorrow. (かしまし～ガール・ミーツ・ガール～) Anyone going to buy? ~Kylu (\| `	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
50,183,812	` Why are we rehashing this tired old subject all over again? Are we going to have this argument repeatedly every time someone reads the article, and starts mechanically chanting the ``homosexuality has nothing to do with pedophilia`` mantra? This issue was settled a long time ago, and correctly in my opinion. NAMBLA was an essential part of the gay rights movement and is a gay organization. Today's politically convenient revisionism of gay history by gays fleeing in terror from right wing talking points is irrelevant for encyclopedic purposes. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
50,183,924	`I did mean it. Your using that sig implies you are an admin, which you are not. As you have continued using it, I have blocked you 24 hours for disruption. [[WP:EA\|E]] + at 01:21 UTC (2006-04-26) `	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
50,184,786	` == unblock == Your user name or IP address has been blocked from editing. You were blocked by Kelly Martin for the following reason (see our blocking policy): ``Suspected botnet outproxy being used to vandalize and otherwise violate Wikipedia policy`` Your IP address is 204.13.170.50. Media:Example.ogg`	2,006	false	user	blocked	test	false
50,184,881	== unblock == This account has been blocked indefinitely because it has edited from, or was created from, the IP address , which has been identified as a probable compromised webhost or open proxy. If you believe this decision to be in error, please contact us at info-en@wikipedia.org and we can discuss releasing this block.	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
50,187,202	== Message from Tyche == Could you help me out on this point. That is if you remember it. If you remember otherwise then that's fine too. If you'd rather not that's fine also. http://www.mudconnect.com/discuss/discuss.cgi?mode=MSG2&area;=admin&page;=8&message;=4602#newest Sorry to bug you, but this is the only way I could remember to contact you.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
50,192,356	And i also invite you to do the same. Wikipedia does not belong to any user, neither to any administrator, there are rules and regulations for them aswell. They can too be reported for abusing their powers and accusing with no reason. From being accused of being rude to being accused for deleting that accusation from my page, because it's considered a warning message, that's alot of accusation don't you think. ). Oh well no harm no fowl. Please do carry on.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
50,204,597	==Google Bowling== Anyone know enough to write an article on Google Bowling? 30,000 results on google. \|	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
50,217,272	`:::The question is not what something is called, but what it is. If you call a tail a leg, a dog still has four legs, not five. Wikipedia wouldn't have enough room to hold the entire list of things various right wing cranks consider to be associated with ``pedophilia.`` Your point is moot. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
50,222,654	I am not blanking, I am editing as per user's request,	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
50,228,787	`== A welcome from == Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers: If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself. Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments. The Five Pillars of Wikipedia Simplified Ruleset How to edit a page Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial Picture tutorial How to write a great article Naming conventions Manual of Style *Wikipedia Glossary I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful. Happy editing! ( ¦ ✉)'' `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
50,230,438	` == Album title format == I redirected the album page to this one for the simple fact that if you look at the album cover you can clearly see a hyphen between the words ``death`` and ``grip`` indicating that A Death-Grip on Yesterday is the album's proper and correct title. – `	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
50,233,328	` ==Re: Welcoming template== It's shamelessly stolen and modified from (he stole it back to make one for anons too) ) `	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
50,233,628	: The point was settled. Nevermind. -)	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
50,243,354	` ==Namemove== This was moved from Alex Jones (journalist) to Alex Jones (radio). i object to this. It should be Alex Jones, period, since he is the most known Alex Jones. See article Ali, Umar and Muhammad, we dont have Muhammad (prophet). Also, changing from ``Journalist`` to ``Radio`` is impiying he is not known as a Journalist, but rather as a radio perosnality, and that is false. A bad faith move in my view. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
50,247,121	- Here go louis: RabbitInABlenderCorp. 42 Oxford St Phone 04242 642742 London City Fax 24240 247246 London MM42 42M M Freeman Grumpy Old Teacher Ltd. 22 Complaint St Misery Town Gwynedd LI36 99E 22 March 2006 Dear Mr Freeman I am writing to thank you for your letter of 21 March and hope to hear future feedback on our tumble dryers. I wish to express my utter apology for the poor standard of our tumble dryers that you recently have received. I assure you that the fault was not of the manufacturers, but of the transport company that we hire to deliver our products. The tumble dryers left our company in perfect condition, and therefore were not properly packaged into the lorries and were damaged in the journey. As for the colour schemes, we are to believe that the tumble dryers were being delivered along side some cans of paint and must have got mixed up along the way. We will have a word with the delivery company to sort out the problem and so future deliveries should arrive in the high standard expected of our company. In the meantime might we interest you in some exclusive discount vouchers on future orders. Find enclosed our brochure. Your Sincerely N Thorpe Complaints Manager Ref. ASK/ME	2,006	false	user	blocked	test	false
50,248,581	. Embryonic stem cells future are limied by two factors. First ESCs are likely to form a type of cancer of multiple cell types called teratoma, second the ESCs must be a close match to the patient to mitigate the potentially deadly effects of graft vs host disease	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
50,249,729	. Catherine Varfaillie of the university of Minnesota was able isolate the potentially ploripotent MPAC from bone marrow populations. Still there are other powerful stem cells found in BMSC populations, including mesenchymal. There was a claim of a lübeck stem cell also being ploripotent and formed organoids but that was not peer reviewed, and such claims have disapeared. Oligofactory cells are believed to be ploripotent, and are located around the nose and brain. The university of pittsburg also found the amniotic epithelial are also ploripotent which can be obtained from the placenta	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
50,250,231	` ::HI! I retract my statment regarding bad faith, it was undeserved. Quote from Journalism: :::''Journalism is a discipline of collecting, analyzing, verifying, and presenting information gathered regarding current events, including trends, issues and people. ::I argue that it is self evident that Jones is doing that. I apologise for the ``bad faith`` line. Peace! `	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
50,256,592	All rationals are questionable, my friend. There is indeed little precedent, the trend, as I pointed out, is towards - quite rightly - favoring the sovereign state, and one or two exceptions do not, as I pointed out, cancel the more numerous other examples out. - (')''' *	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
50,257,642	Please stop. If you continue to blank or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Sinclair Lewis, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
50,260,402	Well, thanks for that vanity comment, given that as far as I can remember I have never editted this page and I have no connections with the user that did add the picture. It really helps to say that.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
50,262,648	`If the ``gay community`` bans or criticizes a gay organization for political purposes, that does not make the discriminated against organization less gay. NAMBLA was formed by gays, for the purpose of gay liberation, to fight mistreatment of gays. All its original founders and celebrity supporters were gay icons. Until the right wing decided to use NAMBLA to target the gay community, and gays decided that gay rights wouldn't happen with NAMBLA attached to their movement, NAMBLA marched in gay pride parades, and belonged to many gay unbrella organizations. Gays do not get to cherry pick those parts of gay history which they think will pacify their critics, and retroactively declare some of their former activities ``non-gay.`` That would be like the NAACP declaring Jesse Jackson's Rainbow Coalition to not be a part of the Negro community. ::::`	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
50,264,224	`>You must mean, your own errors, Mantey. 1. You seem unable to even quote the correct link to the paper. It is [ http://www.wbabin.net/sfarti/sfarti19.pdf here] 2. Again, you can't even quote my formulas correctly. 3. The Maxwell equations that you keep clamaoring for are embedded in the text. You need a much better knowledge of physics to recognize them. Hint: ever heard of Kirchoff's ``laws``? No? It is obvious that you haven't. So, Mantey, you have your answers. : `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
50,268,356	Maybe a small explantion of terms near the start of the page? In enthusiast circles the European Foci are split into 3 verions, the Mk1 Mk1.5 and Mk2. Most dealers would know the different Mk1's as the Mk1 pre-facelift and Mk1 facelift models, and the Mk2. Although the majority of the public would not realise any of this it doesnt mean it should be left out of the article as long as some kind of explanation is given, there are differences between European Mk1 and Mk1.5 foci which go beyond different bumpers and lights.	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
50,282,463	` I agree with you on most of what you said, but I also think that the Crucifix roll up should remain and the Springboard into a double axe handle should remain, becuase she uses those frequently aswell. Every thing else can go e.g like the generic ``Double Clothesline``.`	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
50,287,883	== Criticism Section == A criticism section is probably warranted. If it could be improved on what I wrote, that would be great. An article about a country that conquered and devastated as many nations as Rome cannot be complete without some form of a criticism section	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
50,288,752	:::::::I disagree. I still have major problems with the article. Just to double-check, am I allowed to even comment on the facts in the talk page? If not, then I'll leave. I don't want to give Will, SlimVirgin, Snowspinner, et. al another excuse to block me.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
50,288,871	: It clearly says that Karl is sixteen in the very first sentence of the book.	2,006	false	article	random	train	false
50,299,085	` how about the brewer ``highgate ales`` from walsall`	2,006	false	article	blocked	dev	false
50,302,105	I'm sure she will be training to get better, but from the tag team matches she was in weekly, you could see that she was developing a repetoire of moves. From her Royal Rumble match with Mickie James, you could see that she has come leaps and bounds from her first matches with Victoria and Torrie! Give it a few months and she'll be the new WWE Women's Champion!	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
50,304,171	Molly Holly is good but the thing is we need to have the Smackdown Divas compete for the Women's Championship aswell! I still belive that Melina is still the most dominant Diva in the WWE and the best female wrestler much better than the stale Trish with the same moveset! If she is to get another title shot I guarantee that she'll be the new Women's Champion. She will bring back class to the belt! ( )	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
50,312,146	==merge Central Powers into this one== They highly duplicate.	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
50,314,563	Bold textStratford-upon-avon is old...	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
50,321,195	` == What is ``commenting out`` and why did you do it? == JoshuaZ magically made a paragraph disappear, and wrote: ``Allegations of suppression of cold fusion research - commenting out correctly.`` Evidently he feels this paragraph should go, because he imagines it is ``original research.`` Since he is a skeptic he will insist on this despite all evidence to the contrary. My question is, why not simply delete the offending paragraph? What is this commenting out business, and why bother with it? The claim that a letter from Nature constitutes ``original research`` is mind-boggling. Would a letter from Pres. Bush also be ``original research``? In what sense? The content of this letter is common knowledge to hundreds of cold fusion researchers, and it has been discussed in two books, but evidently JoshuaZ is determined to find an excuse to keep the rest of the world from finding it on Wikipedia. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
50,323,082	`Re: ``There are two separate points of significance in this paragraph, and the language juxtaposes the two unnecessarily. Let's parse 'em, separate 'em out, and say it so it can be understood...`` `	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
50,325,682	` : A wooden table is made of 99% wood, which comes from a tree, which is a vegetable. Sneaky? Perhaps. Technically accurate? Yes. Perhaps someone should gather the alternative names for Twenty Questions throughout the world. Alfr%C3%A9d R%C3%A9nyi noted the Hungarian ``Barkochba game`` in 1969, while Charles Dickens noted that the Victorian version was called ``Yes and no.`` `	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
50,327,941	`::::::So you're arguing that an organization can be gay one minute and not gay the next, depending on its popularity and which way the prevailing political winds are blowing, and that encyclopedia content should be constantly varying, according to the instantaneous reading of some sort of gay-o-meter? For the purposes of documenting history, this is probably not the right definition of ``gay`` to employ. At a rally trying to make a persuasive argument for gay rights, it probably is. Since Wikipedia is factual knowlege, and not a rally, the gay community doesn't get to vote on the daily gayness of gay things, and that includes NAMBLA, which is a gay organization. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
50,341,147	` ::Oh. Huh. I don't see the point it. (Commenting out, I mean.) ::If it is the Wikipedia standard not to trust a signed letter from the person who sets Nature policy, or to call this ``original research`` (whatever on God's green earth that means in this context) then I would say Wikipedia is never-never land. But we knew that already, as Arthur Clarke would say. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
50,341,490	==George W. Bush 2nd(second nomination)== Come out and vote, nothing but one big long leftist diatribe, should be removed and covered from scratch in a more NPOV style,Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George W. Bush 2nd(second nomination), your vote may just give us the fresh start needed to root the deep seeded liberal POV from this article by allowing us to start over from scratch, thanks for your vote!	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
50,344,697	` I can see you do have strict standards! High standards. Quite amazingly high, when it comes to something you disagree with. Alpine high. Ah, but, when you agree, anything goes! I have cut out statements from this article that were not only totaly unsourced, and obviously imaginary, they were gross volations of basic physics. They would embarrass Taubes. Statements that mix up power and energy, temperature and scale. Ridiculous distortions and rumors, and goodness knows how many unfalsifiable assertions. And yet, for some strange reason this stuff keep popping in again, and it seems the authors are . . . skeptics! ``Strict`` hardly begins to describe it. S&M; comes to mind. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
50,346,907	Keep at it. You are doing good. ::Seriously, and sincerely, the sections you marked were weak. I chopped one completely, and I believe I beefed the others up. You probably do not agree I improved them, but I thank you. ::However, I request that you mark the problems instead of chopping them out. Of course I have no objection whatever to adjustments, and I encourage you to scour the skeptical literature and add any important stuff that I overlooked.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
50,347,140	:Yeah, well, when you guys saunter in and vandalize my talk page, removing the actual record, that's a personal attack, so don't whine when I have to defend myself against rogue admins and the like. I've had enough of that BS. You don't define what the rest of us expect of editors, and we don't appreciate you messing with us. ::	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
50,347,441	== Re Talk Page Support == Thanks for your support. I swear these guys pick an ideological opponent at random, vandalize their page, and then watch it very carefully so responses so they can begin trolling. :	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
50,368,029	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bruce_Gabrielson Read for background on this page. A user on Wikipedia is making entires all over Wiki to use as advertising for his businesses and linking them all together. Look at the users contributions: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target;=Hbsnake1 MOST have been slated for deletion by Admins on Wikipedia	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
50,379,764	::I won't remove the sock-puppet, but just let me edit the page one more time. And may I ask why the hell I'd continue contributing positively if I cant even reference to my own work? And I hope you have taken heed of my final coment	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
50,384,629	:Rick, glad you're still checking on this article. Do you think the structure is Okay? There are a couple of bits that are repetitive now, and I'm going to try to get to those. Yes, I thought about planets being contentious, but most people wouldn't think of that. However, I thought your example of ten digits in base 10 was really nice personally.	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
50,385,437	` Your user name or IP address has been blocked from editing. You were blocked by Sasquatch for the following reason (see our blocking policy): ``vandalism`` Your IP address is 130.194.13.102. `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
50,391,669	Mibharovsk, my motive for writing is clearly visible to you. I have a chip on my shoulder directed towards some of the editors of this page. You should already know why. There can be no logical Wikipedian policy that would disbar me from writing this. Are you going to block once again? All eyes on you! I am going to side with Fnhddzs. He/she knows what he/she is saying. Sounds like genocide it is! Give some compelling evidence otherwise? As the only third party on the page, I think you should listen to Fhnddzs. He/she is obviously right.	2,006	false	article	blocked	test	false
50,398,028	===The image== In case, you have taken the snap, please update the copyright status as GFDL-self, and place these within brackets {{)) - in case, you have taken the snap, please send me a meeesage on my talk page and I shall do the needful. Thank you.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
50,404,856	, 27 April 2006 (UTC) ::* The Game is an abstract mental game, the objective of which is to forget its existence. ::* There is no point in calling The Game a meme, the majority of stuff on Wikipedia is a meme. A meme is simply any idea or concept. I think what this refers to is a common misconception of the word meme, basically meaning a fad. The Game has some interesting memetic properties, but these should be described elsewhere in the article if anywhere. Whoever wants the meme version up should read the meme article first. 11:04	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
50,406,153	:This is a not alcoholic anonymous, if you want to go sing gumbaya around a camp fire , this is not the place	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
50,407,595	== Legend == This is a city-phantom... No peoples... No animals...	2,006	false	article	random	train	false
50,424,308	(looks more credible, at any rate). Still, it wouldn't hurt to revert and figure it out yourself	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
50,425,976	== NFL Draft == By basically saying he is going to be taken by the Tennessee Titans and only the Tennessee Titans when they are actively considering Vince Young is pov. The Oakland Raiders are a possibility and the New York Jets, but the middle 1st round teams could move up as well though I doubt somebody like the Colts or the Steelers could or would move up.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
50,435,630	Trouton did not use Ohm, you definitely don't know electromagnetism. He used some other form of Maxwell's equations but you wouldn't know. They are right in front of your nose but you can't see them, Mantey. Take a remedial class.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
50,435,713	Gregory9's lack of understanding of basic physics	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
50,435,809	== Jed's talk page == I will delete my talk page anytime I feel like it, as I have done several times in the past. I do not wish to hear your views on this matter, or any other. I will probably delete any message you post on my talk page, so don't bother posting one.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
50,436,299	Liberate is the most accurate term, since it was territory within the Soviet Union that had been occupied by a hostile foreign country. I don't really see why it's so contreversial, other than because polititians will often twist the meaning of that word. (Peaceful Liberation of Tibet, Liberation of Iraq, etc., etc.	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
50,436,575	and :here where it has always been	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
50,437,327	== Aheh this is amusing == http://whois.domaintools.com/goddessy.com Read the Yahoo and Dmoz descriptions, MADE ONLY by the webmaster of the site: DMOZ Title: Tarot Card Readings By Sorceress DMOZ Description: Egyptian based Tarot card readings; tarot related services also available. Yahoo Title: Goddessy Yahoo Description: Specializes in online psychic readings.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
50,437,820	this is the part you keep deleting Mehmed II used the conquering army to restore the physical structure of the city. Old buildings were repaired, streets, aqueducts, and bridges were constructed, sanitary facilities were modernized, and a vast supply system was established to provide for the city's inhabitants. now lets discuss 1., cant see where Ottoman empire was seen as a federation here. 2. none of the byzantine monuments were destroyed in the siege so its impossible to understand what u r talking about. 3. Yes it had a supply system before but also other infrastructure systems were built so i cant see a reason to delete that part. ( )	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
50,438,540	Well, this is something that is very knowable, not something that is subject to interpritation. One or the other made a stupid mistake or gross misstatement. That's not the same thing in my mind as experts disagreeing.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
50,438,675	` == Let's Clarify Something here == First of all, nice to meet you Stephanie Adams. I to am a very well known celebrity, I just in fact was almost a winner for a daytime Emmy award (but that's neither here nor there) I think what the big confusion is about Wikipedia is that it is verifiable information, not what you WANT on your wikipedia article. Meaning, awhile back your website sold tarot card readings via email, we can all see that looking at the cached version of it. Maybe you do not do that anymore but your company DID in fact do it. Therefore since Wikipedia is a historicaly piece of work, it should be listed. Maybe instead you could add in ``Used to.... but does not anymore`` I used to dance with Hula Hoops on stage. I do not anymore. But if a person put on my Wikipedia Article, ``Julianna Mauriello used to dance with hula hoops on stage`` then I could not mark that as non factual and write on wikipedia that it is not true. So for that reason, since I can see that your website USED to sell Tarot readings via email, I am going to revert it but also comment it to show that you no longer DO tarot card readings. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julianna_Rose_Mauriello `	2,006	false	article	blocked	test	false
50,439,562	Landing cross-foot was not started by Shiloh or Bastein. It's a freestyle trick that's around 30 years old.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
50,440,500	- :No way to know, since the only mention of the Dilu horse (Or Hex Mark if you like) was when Liu Bei lept with it over the Tan river but it's not confirmed if that event actually happened.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
50,441,903	== Wii == The name of the console is Wii http://revolution.nintendo.com/	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
50,461,677	:That's cool. Rock on, VDZ. -	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
50,466,481	'''Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuc	2,006	false	user	blocked	dev	true
50,471,029	I haven't vandalized crap. I just tell it like it is! You got a fucking problem with me, then maybe you need to take a long look at yourself. Don't fucking e-mail me again. Take care.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	true
50,472,998	`This channel is indeed useless, and will continue to be. Ever since it's first day of broadcast, the ``token`` ethnically-diverse newscasters were laughable. Now they don't do news, and the channel is officially worthless. Something interesting that came out of Toronto1 and the CHUM deal was CityTV being given rights to broadcast Monday Night Football in 2005, which Toronto1 previously had rights to. If this channel is around with it's current ``image`` in 10 years, I'll be flabbergasted. It should be scrapped and sold for parts. I'm sure there's someone out there who could use the frequency for, say, a 24 hour traffic channel? Or maybe a 24 hour stock ticker. I mean, at least people would watch those. The pathetic thing about Toronto1, is despite all of it's failures, it was one of the FIRST channels (second only to CityTV) in Toronto to broadcast in ATSC (HDTV over UHF airwaves). Of course, no HDTV content except rebroadcasts of football from ABC. Even today, major players such as Global and OMNI1 still refuse to unveil this next-gen technology. Perhaps had Craig not spent so many millions of $ on HDTV equipment to comply with a CRTC deadline that was in the end lifted, they'd not in be such dire straits. `	2,006	false	article	random	train	false
50,475,663	WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 'UNCERTAIN BEHAVIOR NEOPLASM' AND UNSPECIFIED NEOPLASM? THANK YOU,	2,006	false	article	random	train	false
50,480,714	Firestar, who is this Rick Ross you mentioned? Does he teach at some respectable university? I sincerely doubt it. You know, I may say whatever I want about the nature of the Thirty Years War, but it doesn't mean anything to someone investigating it. You need to have sources who actually have some relevance. Is Ross a cult expert? Would he invariably call my religion, the Christian faith, a cult as well? I know the CCP would. I don't think these are viable sources. Introduce some methodology for Pete's sake! I think Mccon is totally right! Mibhorovovsky, I know you are just itching to block me. But now, all eyes are on you. Go ahead. I dare you. As a neutral third party to this discussion, I have to encourage some of you to make better arguments. In fact the very way that some things on this site have been said have inevitably led to my having a HUGE chip on my shoulder directed towards some of you. You should know that, though Mibhorovosky reverted what I said and blocked me, leading to censorship.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
50,484,015	Mibhorovovosky, this sounds like a personal attack to me. Check it out: * very important point: controlling information is a mind control (brainwashing) technique. In order for the mind to make decision information is needed; when one controls information that others receive one controls others' minds. (source: Steven Hassan, Releasing the Bonds, page 43.) Olaf, you are trying to control people’s mind. Samuel Luo Why wasn't Samuel blocked for 24 hours for making this pejorative accusation towards Olaf? Samuel has no grounds to make this accusation. In academics, it is quite well known that ALL writing is biased, and reflects personal characteristics of the one doing the writing. For Samuel to make such an argument here is out of line. He has no justifiable grounds to do so. Therefore, you must conclude that this is a personal attack on Olaf's character and his actions!	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
50,487,311	Well I can because these editors use the most inane methodologies. It's quite evident. They have earned my lasting enmity. As a good Christian, I take no issue with what is going on here. But I think Olaf and Dijip and some of those others are good people who seem honest.	2,006	false	article	blocked	test	false
50,489,801	Well, do you think Mibhorovovovsky missed the ball on blocking Samuel? It's quite obvious to any layman.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
50,516,020	I actually heard that he died from alcohol poisioning.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
50,522,374	My brother actually wrote that vandilism, i was in the washroom and he is the only other person with acess to my computer, and i sincerely apologize for his behavior. may i please be unblocked?	2,006	false	user	random	test	false
50,523,378	Sergei Mikhas Mikhailov should redirect here.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
50,523,566	` I never said you were wrong; I said I don't approve of the way you're working articles. - `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
50,524,100	: Its a major religion - they claim 8 million adherents.	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
50,525,461	: Smells like clever disinformation . The guy quotes his own original research alleging phone conversations and interviews that are not published anywhere by an independent sources.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
50,526,848	:: Here you go . In general I would say that most membership numbers of most religions are quite bogus , as they are often nothing else but triumphalistic hot hair based on the wishful estimates or guesses of their own members. No one ever has counted memberships yet the numbers are thrown around as though they were facts. With that being said, Scientology is a household name , good or bad and has a presence around the world . Its a major religion	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
50,530,231	What are the sources you are using? I don't need to tell you my sources, since I am correcting OBVIOUS pro-PAN and neoliberal bias.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
50,540,587	No, iam afraid wikipedia is not the place for that. Keep your theory's and own ideals to yourself. Just because I think the first Colossus resembles my uncle Karsus doesent mean I go and write my theory that it was derived from him therefor; Revert - Anon	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
50,542,046	== David Hare == I was thinking about the famous educationist David Hare, one of the pioneers of modern western education in India and founder of many famous institutions of education such as Precidency College, Kolkata and Hare School. He is the person refered to by your link.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
50,543,144	No such thing as Islamic mathematics The religion of Islam does not include math, there is no connection. Mathematicians who were living in regions were Islam was the dominant religion , does not imply that they were Islamic mathematicians . The term makes no sense , but is rather used in some sort of vain attempt at associating the glory of the accomplishments of mathematicians and scientists with the religion of Islam. The fact of studying the Qu'ran makes no impact on one's mathematic ability. The same goes for any other association of a faith with a scientific field. Thus editors who are going around weaving terms like Islamic mathematicians are using Wikipedia as a soap box.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
50,548,148	`Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Pakistan. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. - `	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
50,552,552	== Busking and street performing not the same. Do not merge. == Please do not merge these two topics. The only thing that the share is the venue, in every other way they are very different forms of performance as the entry of street performance clearly states. If you merge busking and street theatre, then you might as well merge opera and ballet because they share the same stage. One of the main reasons to have a street performing entry is to make clear the distinction between this and busking.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
50,557,964	` == Revival of what? == This phrase puzzles me ``Second Empire was succeeded by the Queen Anne Style era, and its sub-styles, which enjoyed great popularity until the rise of the “Revival Era” in American architecture just before the end of the 19th century.`` what exactly is the ``Revical Era`` is it the Gothic Revival, which contrary to the claim in the lead never fell out of fashion in certain areas or design, or is it something else compltely. \| `	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
50,559,737	== u have to reply this..!! == hello... i just wanted to ask about this poem pointing of....like explain what does this poem is telling about so we could undersdtand wat does it mean in point of view., well i guess thats all what i need to know i hope u can reply this message...!! as soon as possible~ ~~	2,006	false	article	blocked	test	false
50,562,511	::I oppose the move. See also Talk:Islamic science.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
50,582,170	Why should I give you any benefit of the doubt when you have given no such thing to me?	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
50,583,569	. His styles are prob best not overcomplicated but he was an Irish MP from 1790 (trim) - underage at that - and later for GB. But I think it will clutter things up too much to keep adding more material	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
50,583,731	*I support the X district convention because district is not part of the name. If it were part of the official name then it would be the same in all the languages of India. But that is not the case. Take the example of Ahmedabad. If Ahmedabad District be the real name, then the same name would be used even in gujarati. But in Gujarat distric is called 'jilla' - So Ahmedabad district becomes Ahmedabad jilla and not Ahmedabad District jilla. The same is the case for all other languages. It is just because this is the english wiki that we must X district. Also I must request other editors on both sides involved here not to take this issue personally. That mars our goal of trying to reach to some decision. -	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
50,588,652	It might not have been your intent, but you recently removed content from Rosa Parks. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
50,596,156	== This article sucks == I would nominate it for deletion if it wasn't protected.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	true
50,597,173	== False == This article is factually inaccurate. - Stephen Spatz history teacher G.A.S.D.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false

50,175,747

`Thank you for experimenting with the page Sewage treatment on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. e `

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

50,176,212

Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: *The five pillars of Wikipedia *How to edit a page *Help pages *Tutorial *How to write a great article *Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! /\@

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

50,181,961

` == DVD? == Chatting: Now, I'm afraid my Japanese sucks, but unless it's gotten horribly worse today, it looks like the first DVD volume is out tomorrow. (かしまし～ガール・ミーツ・ガール～) Anyone going to buy? ~Kylu (| `

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

50,183,812

` Why are we rehashing this tired old subject all over again? Are we going to have this argument repeatedly every time someone reads the article, and starts mechanically chanting the ``homosexuality has nothing to do with pedophilia`` mantra? This issue was settled a long time ago, and correctly in my opinion. NAMBLA was an essential part of the gay rights movement and is a gay organization. Today's politically convenient revisionism of gay history by gays fleeing in terror from right wing talking points is irrelevant for encyclopedic purposes. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

50,183,924

`I did mean it. Your using that sig implies you are an admin, which you are not. As you have continued using it, I have blocked you 24 hours for disruption. [[WP:EA|E]] + at 01:21 UTC (2006-04-26) `

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

50,184,786

` == unblock == Your user name or IP address has been blocked from editing. You were blocked by Kelly Martin for the following reason (see our blocking policy): ``Suspected botnet outproxy being used to vandalize and otherwise violate Wikipedia policy`` Your IP address is 204.13.170.50. Media:Example.ogg`

2,006

false

user

blocked

test

false

50,184,881

== unblock == This account has been blocked indefinitely because it has edited from, or was created from, the IP address , which has been identified as a probable compromised webhost or open proxy. If you believe this decision to be in error, please contact us at info-en@wikipedia.org and we can discuss releasing this block.

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

50,187,202

== Message from Tyche == Could you help me out on this point. That is if you remember it. If you remember otherwise then that's fine too. If you'd rather not that's fine also. http://www.mudconnect.com/discuss/discuss.cgi?mode=MSG2&area;=admin&page;=8&message;=4602#newest Sorry to bug you, but this is the only way I could remember to contact you.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

50,192,356

And i also invite you to do the same. Wikipedia does not belong to any user, neither to any administrator, there are rules and regulations for them aswell. They can too be reported for abusing their powers and accusing with no reason. From being accused of being rude to being accused for deleting that accusation from my page, because it's considered a warning message, that's alot of accusation don't you think. ). Oh well no harm no fowl. Please do carry on.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

50,204,597

==Google Bowling== Anyone know enough to write an article on Google Bowling? 30,000 results on google. |

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

50,217,272

`:::The question is not what something is called, but what it is. If you call a tail a leg, a dog still has four legs, not five. Wikipedia wouldn't have enough room to hold the entire list of things various right wing cranks consider to be associated with ``pedophilia.`` Your point is moot. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

50,222,654

I am not blanking, I am editing as per user's request,

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

50,228,787

`== A welcome from == Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers: *If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself. *Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments. *The Five Pillars of Wikipedia *Simplified Ruleset *How to edit a page *Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial *Picture tutorial *How to write a great article *Naming conventions *Manual of Style *Wikipedia Glossary I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful. Happy editing! ( ¦ ✉)'' `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

50,230,438

` == Album title format == I redirected the album page to this one for the simple fact that if you look at the album cover you can clearly see a hyphen between the words ``death`` and ``grip`` indicating that A Death-Grip on Yesterday is the album's proper and correct title. – `

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

50,233,328

` ==Re: Welcoming template== It's shamelessly stolen and modified from (he stole it back to make one for anons too) ) `

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

50,233,628

: The point was settled. Nevermind. -)

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

50,243,354

` ==Namemove== This was moved from Alex Jones (journalist) to Alex Jones (radio). i object to this. It should be Alex Jones, period, since he is the most known Alex Jones. See article Ali, Umar and Muhammad, we dont have Muhammad (prophet). Also, changing from ``Journalist`` to ``Radio`` is impiying he is not known as a Journalist, but rather as a radio perosnality, and that is false. A bad faith move in my view. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

50,247,121

- Here go louis: RabbitInABlenderCorp. 42 Oxford St Phone 04242 642742 London City Fax 24240 247246 London MM42 42M M Freeman Grumpy Old Teacher Ltd. 22 Complaint St Misery Town Gwynedd LI36 99E 22 March 2006 Dear Mr Freeman I am writing to thank you for your letter of 21 March and hope to hear future feedback on our tumble dryers. I wish to express my utter apology for the poor standard of our tumble dryers that you recently have received. I assure you that the fault was not of the manufacturers, but of the transport company that we hire to deliver our products. The tumble dryers left our company in perfect condition, and therefore were not properly packaged into the lorries and were damaged in the journey. As for the colour schemes, we are to believe that the tumble dryers were being delivered along side some cans of paint and must have got mixed up along the way. We will have a word with the delivery company to sort out the problem and so future deliveries should arrive in the high standard expected of our company. In the meantime might we interest you in some exclusive discount vouchers on future orders. Find enclosed our brochure. Your Sincerely N Thorpe Complaints Manager Ref. ASK/ME

2,006

false

user

blocked

test

false

50,248,581

. Embryonic stem cells future are limied by two factors. First ESCs are likely to form a type of cancer of multiple cell types called teratoma, second the ESCs must be a close match to the patient to mitigate the potentially deadly effects of graft vs host disease

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

50,249,729

. Catherine Varfaillie of the university of Minnesota was able isolate the potentially ploripotent MPAC from bone marrow populations. Still there are other powerful stem cells found in BMSC populations, including mesenchymal. There was a claim of a lübeck stem cell also being ploripotent and formed organoids but that was not peer reviewed, and such claims have disapeared. Oligofactory cells are believed to be ploripotent, and are located around the nose and brain. The university of pittsburg also found the amniotic epithelial are also ploripotent which can be obtained from the placenta

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

50,250,231

` ::HI! I retract my statment regarding bad faith, it was undeserved. Quote from Journalism: :::''Journalism is a discipline of collecting, analyzing, verifying, and presenting information gathered regarding current events, including trends, issues and people. ::I argue that it is self evident that Jones is doing that. I apologise for the ``bad faith`` line. Peace! `

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

50,256,592

All rationals are questionable, my friend. There is indeed little precedent, the trend, as I pointed out, is towards - quite rightly - favoring the sovereign state, and one or two exceptions do not, as I pointed out, cancel the more numerous other examples out. - (')''' *

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

50,257,642

Please stop. If you continue to blank or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Sinclair Lewis, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

50,260,402

Well, thanks for that vanity comment, given that as far as I can remember I have never editted this page and I have no connections with the user that did add the picture. It really helps to say that.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

50,262,648

`If the ``gay community`` bans or criticizes a gay organization for political purposes, that does not make the discriminated against organization less gay. NAMBLA was formed by gays, for the purpose of gay liberation, to fight mistreatment of gays. All its original founders and celebrity supporters were gay icons. Until the right wing decided to use NAMBLA to target the gay community, and gays decided that gay rights wouldn't happen with NAMBLA attached to their movement, NAMBLA marched in gay pride parades, and belonged to many gay unbrella organizations. Gays do not get to cherry pick those parts of gay history which they think will pacify their critics, and retroactively declare some of their former activities ``non-gay.`` That would be like the NAACP declaring Jesse Jackson's Rainbow Coalition to not be a part of the Negro community. ::::`

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

50,264,224

`>You must mean, your own errors, Mantey. 1. You seem unable to even quote the correct link to the paper. It is [ http://www.wbabin.net/sfarti/sfarti19.pdf here] 2. Again, you can't even quote my formulas correctly. 3. The Maxwell equations that you keep clamaoring for are embedded in the text. You need a much better knowledge of physics to recognize them. Hint: ever heard of Kirchoff's ``laws``? No? It is obvious that you haven't. So, Mantey, you have your answers. : `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

50,268,356

Maybe a small explantion of terms near the start of the page? In enthusiast circles the European Foci are split into 3 verions, the Mk1 Mk1.5 and Mk2. Most dealers would know the different Mk1's as the Mk1 pre-facelift and Mk1 facelift models, and the Mk2. Although the majority of the public would not realise any of this it doesnt mean it should be left out of the article as long as some kind of explanation is given, there are differences between European Mk1 and Mk1.5 foci which go beyond different bumpers and lights.

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

50,282,463

` I agree with you on most of what you said, but I also think that the Crucifix roll up should remain and the Springboard into a double axe handle should remain, becuase she uses those frequently aswell. Every thing else can go e.g like the generic ``Double Clothesline``.`

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

50,287,883

== Criticism Section == A criticism section is probably warranted. If it could be improved on what I wrote, that would be great. An article about a country that conquered and devastated as many nations as Rome cannot be complete without some form of a criticism section

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

50,288,752

:::::::I disagree. I still have major problems with the article. Just to double-check, am I allowed to even comment on the facts in the talk page? If not, then I'll leave. I don't want to give Will, SlimVirgin, Snowspinner, et. al another excuse to block me.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

50,288,871

: It clearly says that Karl is sixteen in the very first sentence of the book.

2,006

false

article

random

train

false

50,299,085

` how about the brewer ``highgate ales`` from walsall`

2,006

false

article

blocked

dev

false

50,302,105

I'm sure she will be training to get better, but from the tag team matches she was in weekly, you could see that she was developing a repetoire of moves. From her Royal Rumble match with Mickie James, you could see that she has come leaps and bounds from her first matches with Victoria and Torrie! Give it a few months and she'll be the new WWE Women's Champion!

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

50,304,171

Molly Holly is good but the thing is we need to have the Smackdown Divas compete for the Women's Championship aswell! I still belive that Melina is still the most dominant Diva in the WWE and the best female wrestler much better than the stale Trish with the same moveset! If she is to get another title shot I guarantee that she'll be the new Women's Champion. She will bring back class to the belt! ( )

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

50,312,146

==merge Central Powers into this one== They highly duplicate.

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

50,314,563

Bold textStratford-upon-avon is old...

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

50,321,195

` == What is ``commenting out`` and why did you do it? == JoshuaZ magically made a paragraph disappear, and wrote: ``Allegations of suppression of cold fusion research - commenting out correctly.`` Evidently he feels this paragraph should go, because he imagines it is ``original research.`` Since he is a skeptic he will insist on this despite all evidence to the contrary. My question is, why not simply delete the offending paragraph? What is this commenting out business, and why bother with it? The claim that a letter from Nature constitutes ``original research`` is mind-boggling. Would a letter from Pres. Bush also be ``original research``? In what sense? The content of this letter is common knowledge to hundreds of cold fusion researchers, and it has been discussed in two books, but evidently JoshuaZ is determined to find an excuse to keep the rest of the world from finding it on Wikipedia. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

50,323,082

`Re: ``There are two separate points of significance in this paragraph, and the language juxtaposes the two unnecessarily. Let's parse 'em, separate 'em out, and say it so it can be understood...`` `

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

50,325,682

` : A wooden table is made of 99% wood, which comes from a tree, which is a vegetable. Sneaky? Perhaps. Technically accurate? Yes. Perhaps someone should gather the alternative names for Twenty Questions throughout the world. Alfr%C3%A9d R%C3%A9nyi noted the Hungarian ``Barkochba game`` in 1969, while Charles Dickens noted that the Victorian version was called ``Yes and no.`` `

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

50,327,941

`::::::So you're arguing that an organization can be gay one minute and not gay the next, depending on its popularity and which way the prevailing political winds are blowing, and that encyclopedia content should be constantly varying, according to the instantaneous reading of some sort of gay-o-meter? For the purposes of documenting history, this is probably not the right definition of ``gay`` to employ. At a rally trying to make a persuasive argument for gay rights, it probably is. Since Wikipedia is factual knowlege, and not a rally, the gay community doesn't get to vote on the daily gayness of gay things, and that includes NAMBLA, which is a gay organization. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

50,341,147

` ::Oh. Huh. I don't see the point it. (Commenting out, I mean.) ::If it is the Wikipedia standard not to trust a signed letter from the person who sets Nature policy, or to call this ``original research`` (whatever on God's green earth that means in this context) then I would say Wikipedia is never-never land. But we knew that already, as Arthur Clarke would say. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

50,341,490

==George W. Bush 2nd(second nomination)== Come out and vote, nothing but one big long leftist diatribe, should be removed and covered from scratch in a more NPOV style,Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George W. Bush 2nd(second nomination), your vote may just give us the fresh start needed to root the deep seeded liberal POV from this article by allowing us to start over from scratch, thanks for your vote!

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

50,344,697

` I can see you do have strict standards! High standards. Quite amazingly high, when it comes to something you disagree with. Alpine high. Ah, but, when you agree, anything goes! I have cut out statements from this article that were not only totaly unsourced, and obviously imaginary, they were gross volations of basic physics. They would embarrass Taubes. Statements that mix up power and energy, temperature and scale. Ridiculous distortions and rumors, and goodness knows how many unfalsifiable assertions. And yet, for some strange reason this stuff keep popping in again, and it seems the authors are . . . skeptics! ``Strict`` hardly begins to describe it. S&M; comes to mind. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

50,346,907

Keep at it. You are doing good. ::Seriously, and sincerely, the sections you marked were weak. I chopped one completely, and I believe I beefed the others up. You probably do not agree I improved them, but I thank you. ::However, I request that you mark the problems instead of chopping them out. Of course I have no objection whatever to adjustments, and I encourage you to scour the skeptical literature and add any important stuff that I overlooked.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

50,347,140

:Yeah, well, when you guys saunter in and vandalize my talk page, removing the actual record, that's a personal attack, so don't whine when I have to defend myself against rogue admins and the like. I've had enough of that BS. You don't define what the rest of us expect of editors, and we don't appreciate you messing with us. ::

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

50,347,441

== Re Talk Page Support == Thanks for your support. I swear these guys pick an ideological opponent at random, vandalize their page, and then watch it very carefully so responses so they can begin trolling. :

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

50,368,029

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bruce_Gabrielson Read for background on this page. A user on Wikipedia is making entires all over Wiki to use as advertising for his businesses and linking them all together. Look at the users contributions: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target;=Hbsnake1 MOST have been slated for deletion by Admins on Wikipedia

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

50,379,764

::I won't remove the sock-puppet, but just let me edit the page one more time. And may I ask why the hell I'd continue contributing positively if I cant even reference to my own work? And I hope you have taken heed of my final coment

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

50,384,629

:Rick, glad you're still checking on this article. Do you think the structure is Okay? There are a couple of bits that are repetitive now, and I'm going to try to get to those. Yes, I thought about planets being contentious, but most people wouldn't think of that. However, I thought your example of ten digits in base 10 was really nice personally.

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

50,385,437

` Your user name or IP address has been blocked from editing. You were blocked by Sasquatch for the following reason (see our blocking policy): ``vandalism`` Your IP address is 130.194.13.102. `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

50,391,669

Mibharovsk, my motive for writing is clearly visible to you. I have a chip on my shoulder directed towards some of the editors of this page. You should already know why. There can be no logical Wikipedian policy that would disbar me from writing this. Are you going to block once again? All eyes on you! I am going to side with Fnhddzs. He/she knows what he/she is saying. Sounds like genocide it is! Give some compelling evidence otherwise? As the only third party on the page, I think you should listen to Fhnddzs. He/she is obviously right.

2,006

false

article

blocked

test

false

50,398,028

===The image== In case, you have taken the snap, please update the copyright status as GFDL-self, and place these within brackets {{)) - in case, you have taken the snap, please send me a meeesage on my talk page and I shall do the needful. Thank you.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

50,404,856

, 27 April 2006 (UTC) ::* The Game is an abstract mental game, the objective of which is to forget its existence. ::* There is no point in calling The Game a meme, the majority of stuff on Wikipedia is a meme. A meme is simply any idea or concept. I think what this refers to is a common misconception of the word meme, basically meaning a fad. The Game has some interesting memetic properties, but these should be described elsewhere in the article if anywhere. Whoever wants the meme version up should read the meme article first. 11:04

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

50,406,153

:This is a not alcoholic anonymous, if you want to go sing gumbaya around a camp fire , this is not the place

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

50,407,595

== Legend == This is a city-phantom... No peoples... No animals...

2,006

false

article

random

train

false

50,424,308

(looks more credible, at any rate). Still, it wouldn't hurt to revert and figure it out yourself

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

50,425,976

== NFL Draft == By basically saying he is going to be taken by the Tennessee Titans and only the Tennessee Titans when they are actively considering Vince Young is pov. The Oakland Raiders are a possibility and the New York Jets, but the middle 1st round teams could move up as well though I doubt somebody like the Colts or the Steelers could or would move up.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

50,435,630

Trouton did not use Ohm, you definitely don't know electromagnetism. He used some other form of Maxwell's equations but you wouldn't know. They are right in front of your nose but you can't see them, Mantey. Take a remedial class.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

50,435,713

Gregory9's lack of understanding of basic physics

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

50,435,809

== Jed's talk page == I will delete my talk page anytime I feel like it, as I have done several times in the past. I do not wish to hear your views on this matter, or any other. I will probably delete any message you post on my talk page, so don't bother posting one.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

50,436,299

Liberate is the most accurate term, since it was territory within the Soviet Union that had been occupied by a hostile foreign country. I don't really see why it's so contreversial, other than because polititians will often twist the meaning of that word. (Peaceful Liberation of Tibet, Liberation of Iraq, etc., etc.

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

50,436,575

and :here where it has always been

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

50,437,327

== Aheh this is amusing == http://whois.domaintools.com/goddessy.com Read the Yahoo and Dmoz descriptions, MADE ONLY by the webmaster of the site: DMOZ Title: Tarot Card Readings By Sorceress DMOZ Description: Egyptian based Tarot card readings; tarot related services also available. Yahoo Title: Goddessy Yahoo Description: Specializes in online psychic readings.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

50,437,820

this is the part you keep deleting Mehmed II used the conquering army to restore the physical structure of the city. Old buildings were repaired, streets, aqueducts, and bridges were constructed, sanitary facilities were modernized, and a vast supply system was established to provide for the city's inhabitants. now lets discuss 1., cant see where Ottoman empire was seen as a federation here. 2. none of the byzantine monuments were destroyed in the siege so its impossible to understand what u r talking about. 3. Yes it had a supply system before but also other infrastructure systems were built so i cant see a reason to delete that part. ( )

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

50,438,540

Well, this is something that is very knowable, not something that is subject to interpritation. One or the other made a stupid mistake or gross misstatement. That's not the same thing in my mind as experts disagreeing.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

50,438,675

` == Let's Clarify Something here == First of all, nice to meet you Stephanie Adams. I to am a very well known celebrity, I just in fact was almost a winner for a daytime Emmy award (but that's neither here nor there) I think what the big confusion is about Wikipedia is that it is verifiable information, not what you WANT on your wikipedia article. Meaning, awhile back your website sold tarot card readings via email, we can all see that looking at the cached version of it. Maybe you do not do that anymore but your company DID in fact do it. Therefore since Wikipedia is a historicaly piece of work, it should be listed. Maybe instead you could add in ``Used to.... but does not anymore`` I used to dance with Hula Hoops on stage. I do not anymore. But if a person put on my Wikipedia Article, ``Julianna Mauriello used to dance with hula hoops on stage`` then I could not mark that as non factual and write on wikipedia that it is not true. So for that reason, since I can see that your website USED to sell Tarot readings via email, I am going to revert it but also comment it to show that you no longer DO tarot card readings. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julianna_Rose_Mauriello `

2,006

false

article

blocked

test

false

50,439,562

Landing cross-foot was not started by Shiloh or Bastein. It's a freestyle trick that's around 30 years old.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

50,440,500

- :No way to know, since the only mention of the Dilu horse (Or Hex Mark if you like) was when Liu Bei lept with it over the Tan river but it's not confirmed if that event actually happened.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

50,441,903

== Wii == The name of the console is Wii http://revolution.nintendo.com/

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

50,461,677

:That's cool. Rock on, VDZ. -

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

50,466,481

'''Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuck You! Fuc

2,006

false

user

blocked

dev

true

50,471,029

I haven't vandalized crap. I just tell it like it is! You got a fucking problem with me, then maybe you need to take a long look at yourself. Don't fucking e-mail me again. Take care.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

true

50,472,998

`This channel is indeed useless, and will continue to be. Ever since it's first day of broadcast, the ``token`` ethnically-diverse newscasters were laughable. Now they don't do news, and the channel is officially worthless. Something interesting that came out of Toronto1 and the CHUM deal was CityTV being given rights to broadcast Monday Night Football in 2005, which Toronto1 previously had rights to. If this channel is around with it's current ``image`` in 10 years, I'll be flabbergasted. It should be scrapped and sold for parts. I'm sure there's someone out there who could use the frequency for, say, a 24 hour traffic channel? Or maybe a 24 hour stock ticker. I mean, at least people would *watch* those. The pathetic thing about Toronto1, is despite all of it's failures, it was one of the FIRST channels (second only to CityTV) in Toronto to broadcast in ATSC (HDTV over UHF airwaves). Of course, no HDTV content except rebroadcasts of football from ABC. Even today, major players such as Global and OMNI1 still refuse to unveil this next-gen technology. Perhaps had Craig not spent so many millions of $ on HDTV equipment to comply with a CRTC deadline that was in the end lifted, they'd not in be such dire straits. `

2,006

false

article

random

train

false

50,475,663

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 'UNCERTAIN BEHAVIOR NEOPLASM' AND UNSPECIFIED NEOPLASM? THANK YOU,

2,006

false

article

random

train

false

50,480,714

Firestar, who is this Rick Ross you mentioned? Does he teach at some respectable university? I sincerely doubt it. You know, I may say whatever I want about the nature of the Thirty Years War, but it doesn't mean anything to someone investigating it. You need to have sources who actually have some relevance. Is Ross a cult expert? Would he invariably call my religion, the Christian faith, a cult as well? I know the CCP would. I don't think these are viable sources. Introduce some methodology for Pete's sake! I think Mccon is totally right! Mibhorovovsky, I know you are just itching to block me. But now, all eyes are on you. Go ahead. I dare you. As a neutral third party to this discussion, I have to encourage some of you to make better arguments. In fact the very way that some things on this site have been said have inevitably led to my having a HUGE chip on my shoulder directed towards some of you. You should know that, though Mibhorovosky reverted what I said and blocked me, leading to censorship.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

50,484,015

Mibhorovovosky, this sounds like a personal attack to me. Check it out: * very important point: controlling information is a mind control (brainwashing) technique. In order for the mind to make decision information is needed; when one controls information that others receive one controls others' minds. (source: Steven Hassan, Releasing the Bonds, page 43.) Olaf, you are trying to control people’s mind. Samuel Luo Why wasn't Samuel blocked for 24 hours for making this pejorative accusation towards Olaf? Samuel has no grounds to make this accusation. In academics, it is quite well known that ALL writing is biased, and reflects personal characteristics of the one doing the writing. For Samuel to make such an argument here is out of line. He has no justifiable grounds to do so. Therefore, you must conclude that this is a personal attack on Olaf's character and his actions!

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

50,487,311

Well I can because these editors use the most inane methodologies. It's quite evident. They have earned my lasting enmity. As a good Christian, I take no issue with what is going on here. But I think Olaf and Dijip and some of those others are good people who seem honest.

2,006

false

article

blocked

test

false

50,489,801

Well, do you think Mibhorovovovsky missed the ball on blocking Samuel? It's quite obvious to any layman.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

50,516,020

I actually heard that he died from alcohol poisioning.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

50,522,374

My brother actually wrote that vandilism, i was in the washroom and he is the only other person with acess to my computer, and i sincerely apologize for his behavior. may i please be unblocked?

2,006

false

user

random

test

false

50,523,378

Sergei Mikhas Mikhailov should redirect here.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

50,523,566

` I never said you were wrong; I said I don't approve of the way you're working articles. - `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

50,524,100

: Its a major religion - they claim 8 million adherents.

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

50,525,461

: Smells like clever disinformation . The guy quotes his own original research alleging phone conversations and interviews that are not published anywhere by an independent sources.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

50,526,848

:: Here you go . In general I would say that most membership numbers of most religions are quite bogus , as they are often nothing else but triumphalistic hot hair based on the wishful estimates or guesses of their own members. No one ever has counted memberships yet the numbers are thrown around as though they were facts. With that being said, Scientology is a household name , good or bad and has a presence around the world . Its a major religion

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

50,530,231

What are the sources you are using? I don't need to tell you my sources, since I am correcting OBVIOUS pro-PAN and neoliberal bias.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

50,540,587

No, iam afraid wikipedia is not the place for that. Keep your theory's and own ideals to yourself. Just because I think the first Colossus resembles my uncle Karsus doesent mean I go and write my theory that it was derived from him therefor; Revert - Anon

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

50,542,046

== David Hare == I was thinking about the famous educationist David Hare, one of the pioneers of modern western education in India and founder of many famous institutions of education such as Precidency College, Kolkata and Hare School. He is the person refered to by your link.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

50,543,144

No such thing as Islamic mathematics The religion of Islam does not include math, there is no connection. Mathematicians who were living in regions were Islam was the dominant religion , does not imply that they were Islamic mathematicians . The term makes no sense , but is rather used in some sort of vain attempt at associating the glory of the accomplishments of mathematicians and scientists with the religion of Islam. The fact of studying the Qu'ran makes no impact on one's mathematic ability. The same goes for any other association of a faith with a scientific field. Thus editors who are going around weaving terms like Islamic mathematicians are using Wikipedia as a soap box.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

50,548,148

`Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Pakistan. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. - `

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

50,552,552

== Busking and street performing not the same. Do not merge. == Please do not merge these two topics. The only thing that the share is the venue, in every other way they are very different forms of performance as the entry of street performance clearly states. If you merge busking and street theatre, then you might as well merge opera and ballet because they share the same stage. One of the main reasons to have a street performing entry is to make clear the distinction between this and busking.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

50,557,964

` == Revival of what? == This phrase puzzles me ``Second Empire was succeeded by the Queen Anne Style era, and its sub-styles, which enjoyed great popularity until the rise of the “Revival Era” in American architecture just before the end of the 19th century.`` what exactly is the ``Revical Era`` is it the Gothic Revival, which contrary to the claim in the lead never fell out of fashion in certain areas or design, or is it something else compltely. | `

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

50,559,737

== u have to reply this..!! == hello... i just wanted to ask about this poem pointing of....like explain what does this poem is telling about so we could undersdtand wat does it mean in point of view., well i guess thats all what i need to know i hope u can reply this message...!! as soon as possible~ ~~

2,006

false

article

blocked

test

false

50,562,511

::I oppose the move. See also Talk:Islamic science.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

50,582,170

Why should I give you any benefit of the doubt when you have given no such thing to me?

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

50,583,569

. His styles are prob best not overcomplicated but he was an Irish MP from 1790 (trim) - underage at that - and later for GB. But I think it will clutter things up too much to keep adding more material

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

50,583,731

*I support the X district convention because district is not part of the name. If it were part of the official name then it would be the same in all the languages of India. But that is not the case. Take the example of Ahmedabad. If Ahmedabad District be the real name, then the same name would be used even in gujarati. But in Gujarat distric is called 'jilla' - So Ahmedabad district becomes Ahmedabad jilla and not Ahmedabad District jilla. The same is the case for all other languages. It is just because this is the english wiki that we must X district. Also I must request other editors on both sides involved here not to take this issue personally. That mars our goal of trying to reach to some decision. -

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

50,588,652

It might not have been your intent, but you recently removed content from Rosa Parks. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

50,596,156

== This article sucks == I would nominate it for deletion if it wasn't protected.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

true

50,597,173

== False == This article is factually inaccurate. - Stephen Spatz history teacher G.A.S.D.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false