dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
50,598,536	== Sassalism == Please stop. If you continue to sass me, you will be taken back here to G.A.S.D. and forced to mop the floors. Richard A. Gulas, Principal G.A.S.D.	2,006	false	user	blocked	test	true
50,600,513	== Help needed == I needed some help with some articles on this subject and didn't see an obvious project page to put it on, so I'm putting the request here: is a highschool IP which has been making a large number of vandal edits but some productive ones as well. Recently, a large number of edits have occured to articles about football players, especially draft prospects, and I don't know enough to judge whether or not the information contained in them are correct. If someone else would take a look it would be appreciated. Thanks.	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
50,603,255	Is that a Chevy Avalanche on the cover as well?	2,006	false	article	blocked	dev	false
50,603,352	The current version is better but I've had a quick go at tidying it.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
50,605,000	::Sorry but I thoroughly disagree with the above. The only credible source that states Davis was Puerto Rican was Davis who hardly knew his own mother which is contradicted by her and her own living relatives. Also let me be clear that I am not Cuban and have no national interest in this I am just interested in us not placing more precedence on an unreliable source over well researched verifiable sources. There have been similar cases where celebrities have made claims on their ancestry which turn out to be wrong, [[John Kerry, Marlon Brando, Frida Kahlo are all examples so it is not an unusual thing at all.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
50,606,178	, 28 April 2006 (UTC) *In Hialeah, why should Interstate 75 and 80 be unique? All other interstates point to where the physical road ends. Saying Hiaheah is a suburb of Miami is like saying Oakland is a suburb of San Francisco. It's just not true. c 16:51	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
50,608,434	I apologize, but I couldn't find my sources online; I do most of my research at libraries. I'm looking for online parallels, however. Furthermore, I find it difficult to assume good faith in you, as you've given me no reason to. Now, I think a suspension of this argument would be best. I will contain myself if you will do the same.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
50,611,058	` == Request assistance deleting old talk page == Greetings. two of the Wikipedia Sysops (or whatevery you call them here), refuse to let me delete the content of my talk page, for reasons that go beyond my understanding. Some of the material in the talk page is personal. The page includes rough drafts with mistakes that I never intended to make permanent. Had I known I would not be allowed to delete this material, I would never have posted it in the first place. You recently archived part of the page, which is fine, of course. I told you at that time that I planned to clear the whole page, as I do from time to time. You raised no objection, and it never occured to me that anyone would object, but apparently these other two sysops do object. I would appreciate it if you could take steps to clear the page. If you want to keep a copy of any material there for your own purposes, please feel free to do so. For more information, see the message I am about to post here: User_talk:William_M._Connolley ``Please unblock and delete page.`` (I anticipate Mr. Connolley will block my access again after I post that message, so I am sending you this, first.) `	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
50,611,919	` In case Connolley deletes the message I sent him, here is a copy: :``I request that you unblock my ``talk page`` and immediately and permanently delete the contents of it. You are free to permanently block me from contributing to Wikipedia, as I have no intention of doing so in any case. If you would like a reason to block me, or prove that I have violated the rules, you need not preserve the talk page. Here is another deliberate & intentionally provocative violation of the rules an old-school personal insult: :You are a loathsome, sanctimonious, hypocritical, ignorant twit. If you were in state of uncontrolled combustion, I would not take the trouble to extinguish the flames by urinating on them. :I hope that is satisfactory. That should do the trick! `	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
50,611,957	` == Please unblock and delete page == I request that you unblock my ``talk page`` and immediately and permanently delete the contents of it. You are free to permanently block me from contributing to Wikipedia, as I have no intention of doing so in any case. If you would like a reason to block me, or prove that I have violated the rules, you need not preserve the talk page. Here is another deliberate & intentionally provocative violation of the rules an old-school personal insult: You are a loathsome, sanctimonious, hypocritical, ignorant twit. If you were in state of uncontrolled combustion, I would not take the trouble to extinguish the flames by urinating on them. I hope that is satisfactory. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
50,613,370	:::::That wasn't me. I never removed that sentence, and I am perfectly indifferent to it.	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
50,613,709	# Not sure how much weight my vote carries but i think BLEACH works better	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
50,614,583	, 28 April 2006 (UTC) :::Well the censue bureau has never been that smart. San Jose is infact the largest and prime city in that particular region and has been for 10 years, but the census guys still haven't gotten with the times on that either. In this case however I-75 ends 15 miles from the Miami city line, in Hialeah. Why beat around the bush? c 17:48	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
50,614,803	== Pembroke sucks.com == I am from the pembroke area and I found the link to pembroke sucks usefull and interesting. It is as far as I know the only forum dedicated to pembroke and the pembroke area. I say: as far as policy is concerned, coming on here everyday to remove a link that walks the line between usefull and not usefull is imho a little excesive. I understand that the people who run pembroke sucks also don't seem to know when enough is enough (I myself have removed large adds for their site from the pembroke article) and they should get the hint (like.. you don't own this site, and technically your link shouldn't be here. So why do you think it is somehow your right to post it?)but really.... its a link... its not even in the main body of the article. This is not a gateway to some larger problem. Let it go. stop being a link nazi. and stop posting your link where its not welcome. This is not one of the articles where links are used to support points of view (like on, i don't know, white power sites) so whats the big deal?	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	true
50,614,897	==Actual game section== This article needs sections on the game play this is as much a game as it is a story, come on people lets get down to it-Anon	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
50,616,535	:::Later, due to a corruption of the meaning, both the mounds and the supernatural entities (i.e. sprites) became known as the síd, modern Irish sídhe	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
50,620,232	` == Rothwell struggles in vain to withdraw from Wikipedia == This is somewhat off topic, but I was surprised to discover that a person is not allowed to withdraw from Wikipedia or delete the contents of his own talk page. Apparently it is cybernetic tar pit. Had I know it was against the rules to erase one's own talk page, I never would have talked there, since I frequently use it for things like unfinished manuscripts (which have embarrassing errors), jokes and so on, which were never intended to be permanent. Anyway, for the past day or so I have been trying to erase these comments without success. One of the Sysops here, Mr. Connolley apparently wishes to preserve this page because it includes proof that I have committed an egregious violation of the rules, by calling someone: “childish, boorish, pig headed [and] unreasonable” and earlier “an insufferable ninny.” The poor fellow was so overcome by grief & consternation, he felt compelled to report this outrage to the authorities. (I might also call him a crybaby or a tattletale, but he would die of shock. I have done enough damage already; I fear he may need long-term therapy.) Anyway, I was banned for this unspeakable language, and Connelley will not even allow me to purge the evidence of my shame. I changed my description page and sent a message to Connelley with damning evidence for him to use in place of my talk page. I fear he may revert both, and delete this message, but before he does readers here may be amused by the new text here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JedRothwell I quote Schiller's warning: ``Mit der Dummheit kaempfen Goetter selbst vergebens.`` ('Against stupidity the gods themselves struggle in vain.') (Maid of Orleans, act 3, sc. 6). Hence, the title of this message. Thick-skinned readers here might also enjoy the egregious replacement insult I sent to Connelly: :. . . If you would like a reason to block me, or prove that I have violated the rules, you need not preserve the talk page. Here is another deliberate & intentionally provocative violation of the rules an old-school personal insult: :You are a loathsome, sanctimonious, hypocritical, ignorant twit. If you were in state of uncontrolled combustion, I would not take the trouble to extinguish the flames by urinating on them. :I hope that is satisfactory. That goes for you, too, Mr. . . uh, Chihuahua – isn’t it? Bow wow! Ruff! Grrrrr . . . Consider yourself gravely insulted. If this were the 18th century you might challenge me to a duel, but since I am a craven bounder, I would, of course, run away instead of accepting. Believe me, I am trying to get away, without success so far. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	true
50,621,511	*Ah, thank you for the tip.	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
50,651,703	::I agree with Davidnortman's remarks above.	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
50,653,952	I agree- it was one of the most frugal cars. The 1.0 gets about 38MPG in town at rush hour! I bet the Americans wish they could get that now petrol or gasoline has reached the staggering amount of 40pence sterling per litre!	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
50,654,878	stop playing with anal beads. its disgusting.	2,006	false	user	blocked	dev	false
50,657,715	`::::::::::You go wrong as soon as you say ``unless it is documented in some way with names, dates and places``. That's not how Wikipedia works, and we are expressedly forbidden from doing that by Wikipedia:No original research. Further, it is not even necessary to have those things to accept what someone says about their ancestry—only, we have to accurately report that they said this, not that they are what they said. Of course, if we have no source for them saying it, we can't even say that much. This is actually a really straight-forward case as far as the policy is concerned. — `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
50,661,516	Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Your test to Stupidity worked, and has been reverted or removed, but please continue to be bold! Editors are always happy to correct or revert mistakes and discuss changes with which they disagree, though if you want to make further tests, you should use the sandbox. Here are some other links you might find useful: The tutorial How to edit a page How to write a great article And for more detailed information: Help pages - the instruction manual, contains everything you could possibly want to know The five pillars of Wikipedia - our principles, or how to get on with other editors Manual of Style - how to format articles, where to place pictures, and other stylistic matters. You can also check out the community portal, which has lots of ideas on how you can help Wikipedia. All of this information can be daunting, but if you have a question and can't find the answer, you can always ask on or go to Wikipedia:Where to ask a question. One last thing: please sign your name when leaving messages for others on article and user talk pages using (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. I hope you enjoy editing!	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
50,663,533	` : I don't really understand your aggressive attitude. The only person I could be certain of hearing from about the Paris article is you. Call Metroplolitan an 'oubli'. As for the rest and the tone of all this, I find it to be quite overheated, provocating and quite immature - if you are indeed a partisan of reason, I suggest you find another approach. `	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
50,664,800	`:::::I think that picking at the word ``team`` is a little excessive. Wiktionary defines team as: any group of people involved in the same activity. So the word team doesn't imply any level of organization at all. Also, the word ``international`` isn't describing anything more glorious than the fact that all the people are from differant nations(In Wiktionary: Of or having to do with more than one nation). Just because it sounds more impressive than saying ``we got guys from all over`` doesn't mean its false or has to be edited out. I don't know about using the title archeologist though. So I wwould have to say that a french and american coming to your yard to investigate are an international team (assuming they work together in some way) `	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
50,667,470	:Even if I'm leaving this bullshit of Wikipedia forever, I will observe as well what kind of negotiations you will be able to do here, since you began to talk here about gays and Catholic/Orthodox Chuch, instead of caring of this fucked-ass article. Let me tell you a last thing: if you all will continue on this way, you will solve nothing and never. I hope the only 2-3 users here that are logical and know what's the Romanian diaspora will succeed. Good luck to them... P.S> you have motivation to be happy now when I'm leaving (to:Anittas, Ronline, Constantzeanu, Greier and many others) '''''' 28 April 2006	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
50,667,682	:I deliberately chose the better known and more important (from an operational standpoint) Marshals who had decent portraits avalable. Obviously, not everyone could be selected. Objections were raised in peer review that this section was too heavy on pictures and too light on text. Augereau's picture was unfortunately deleted. Lefebvre, quite honestly, was more of a political appointee than an impressive commander in the field. Suchet is more obscure and a somewhat late appointee, but a fine commander nevertheless. The gallant Poniatowski was promoted posthumously. Saint-Cyr is not obscure, but he was a later Marshal and really was not so important in the grande scheme of things, his reputation being largely created by his own post war writings and activities. But I tell you what, let's open up four more slots in the Marshal's gallery. I recommend they be filled by Bessières, Mortier, Poniatowski and either Saint-Cyr or Suchet (depending on whether you prefer a show horse or a warhorse:)	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
50,667,762	I think we should add some tags and get rid of some of the crap.	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
50,669,026	Many of us used to think of you guys as simply D.P.s. I, on the other hand, had the experience of having wound up with neighborsw who were some strain of Serbo/Slavic. They turned out to be just like dagos.	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
50,674,059	` :::::Actually, show me where ``bad faith`` is marked as a reason for a speedy keep. `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
50,682,198	::Hey, at least that statement has a citation. That's better than a lot of the statements on this page.	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
50,693,832	` ::::::::And are you saying we shouldn't call him a ``serial murderer`` because that is a pejorative term? No, we'll call him a serial killer because that is what he is commonly called, and because there is objective evidence that he killed many people. If he was also a child entertainer then we should also apply that category. - `	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
50,694,760	` : I have responded. e `	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
50,699,225	:Read it. Not sure what I'm looking for but thanks for the read.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
50,699,795	== External links to be Arranged == It's a bit unwieldly of a list, and I thought that it would look a whole lot neater should the segments therein be divided into usual categories in pertinance thereto..	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
50,709,807	It is you, who is arguing in a neo-ricardian framework. The difference between you and other Neo-ricardians is that you claim that there is only one basic commodity, namely labor, thinking thereby to save the LTV, whereas other Neoricardians would claim, that besides labor there are other basic commodities, thereby questioning the importance of the LTV and the consequences Marx drew from it. A corn theorist, for instance, is a Neo-Ricardian, who claims that besides labor also corn is a basic commodity. Against this reo-ricardian reasoning some Marxists argue (who are then of course no reo-ricardians), that it is the common social substance (see quote of Marx in the article!) and not the physical or technical substance that matters, for the rest see end of article.	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
50,711,182	:: Are you aware that according to , does not support this change either?	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
50,711,269	`Is the Lincoln Gould that just edited this article the same Lincoln Gould that is the CEO of the NPA? Noting that the ``NPA is the umbrella rganisation for commonly owned newspaper industry service providers. These bodies include the Newspaper Advertising Bureau (NAB), New Zealand Press Association (NZPA) and NZPA Content Services``NPA Information about Newspapers - should Mr Gould really be editing this article? I note that along with substantial changes to the article these included the significant removoval of references to NZPA pulling out of London. `	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
50,717,161	` == Re the whole de-bureaucrating thing == Hi, I never came to thank you for the message you left for me a month ago when I stepped down from being a bureaucrat. Thank you for the things you said, it's good to know there are still plenty of good people about in this project. I do not see myself standing for bureaucrat again anytime soon though who knows what the future may bring! Thank you once again. `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
50,724,831	== Barnstar - Simming Organization == . - ]]	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
50,725,513	`== AP competitors == AP is competing in an increasingly saturated market. Agence France Press? Xinhua? New York Times (+ International Herald Tribune)? : Except for Reuters, AP has no real English-language competition; the other services you name dominate in other languages. I know of no American papers that subscribe solely to the NYTimes and/or Washington Post News services without also subscribing to AP. AP is cheaper and far broader as far as breaking news goes. == History of AP, Brass Check == To a Minister of Truth: I suggest Brass Check is a good book for the state of the AP at the turn of the century - there's more to it than Teletypes, after all. And if AP again has a monopoly on wire-servicing (in the animal-husbandry sense) the US public [just how is the UPI comment to be interpreted?], how that has played out in the past ought to be of interest. Especially since the AP is the sole collator of ``election`` ``results`` tomorrow. And if you protest Brass Check is not about the AP, I'll point out the older Library of Congress catalogue entries list ``Associated Press`` as one of its categories. 00:52, 2004 Nov 2 (UTC) (PS: count y'self lucky I merely mentioned the book, and didn't start rewriting the article.) : There are many, many books about the history of U.S. journalism that contain information about AP which might be of interest to this article, but ``Brass Check`` isn't one of them. It is wildly out of date (especially if you think it has relevance to the current situation; when it was written, AP was a struggling underdog). But of course you are welcome to start rewriting the article - that's the way Wikipedia works! - :: So put some of THOSE books in, fer cryin out loud. (wait. what? How can what is for years an indebted monopoly spreading completely inverted or entirely fabricated news with impunity qualify as ``struggling underdog``?) Incidentally, check history (unless WP has discarded it for lack of space) I am not welcome, even when what I write is well-supported. As a for instance: Nurse Nayirah. (I do not contest that this is because of a certain immoderateness in my writing: after the outrage I've watched go on just the past four years - thanks in part to a US press that, in what counts, lies and covers up as baldly as Sinclair described 85 years ago - I cannot be moderate. If there were moderates taking my place I'd be happy; but so many waste themselves on absolute bread-and-circus garbage like American Idle.) I limit login now to when I express something that's only my opinion. 23:13, 2004 Nov 2 (UTC) ::Oh, I forgot to mention: someone thinks Brass Check interesting enough that the U of Illinois Press reprinted it about two years ago (ISBN 0252071107) 02:51, 2004 Nov 3 (UTC) AP's television service is now known as APTN Note: The picture on the main entry page shows the AP's old headquarters in Rockefeller Center. The company has since moved to Manhattan's West Side. == Retracted Stories == If we're going to list every retracted story that AP, or any other wire service, has run over the years, we're going to have to double the size of wikipedia! So I removed the long, rambling account of one such case, since it lacked context. Discussion about the merits, or lack thereof, of the wire service are certainly valuable additions to the article, but not in the form of a rant. - == Explanation of AP fees == This was originally posted on the Reference Desk with the title ``Is news public domain?`` It seems from the public domain article that facts are in the public domain, but reporting of them may not be. A news agency might do a lot of work to collect some news and expect just compensation. So how is it that news stories can be ``picked up`` by competing agencies, e.g., the Associated Press picking up a story in a local newspaper? Isn't that local news story under copyright? Is there a fee involved or some sort of professional agreement? Thanks. 15:10, 2004 Nov 16 (UTC) :As you can see from the article on the AP, it's owned by its contributing newspapers. A local newspaper allows its stories to be used by the AP because it has the opportunity to use AP wire stories itself. So, the answer is that the news story is certainly under copyright, and the only fees/professional arrangements involved are the money and agreements necessary to maintain the AP. -) [[User:Jwrosenzweig\|Jwrosen	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
50,729,303	Hi, Ainsy. Thanks for joining wikipedia. The reason why your article is being considered for deletion is because it's not encyclopedic. Don't take it personally. Anyway, welcome to the encyclopedia. I'm not officially part of the welcoming crew, but I'll give you the official welcome anyway. - Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
50,738,542	April 2006 (UTC) :Who cares what some noname web critics have to say? Critics have canned all sorts of innovations such as the graphics in Windwaker, the audience for Nintendogs and the extra screen on the DS. I'm more interested in the gameplay than whether it is called wii or bum or whatever. A rose by any other name... / 14:12, 29	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
50,739,248	can A Perfect Circle be removed from thelist of nu metal bands then?	2,006	false	article	random	train	false
50,741,653	:I did not produce the plot, but it seems that for each parameter value of the map the orbit points are plotted. I would prefer the expression orbit diagram, but bifurcation diagram is common usage. Many of the plotted points are close to unstable periodic orbits, so in some sense there are unstable points in the diagram. —	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
50,745,721	==Re: Sam Spade RFA== Hi. I'd be happy to comment on my past experience with Sam, but I haven't had any first-hand dealings with him for quite a long time now, so I'm not sure I'm the best person to bring an RFA against him.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
50,745,854	== POV tag == I've removed the POV tag since there is no feedback here as to how the article lacks POV. I wish people would stop bitching about the name. This is an encyclopedia; a brief comment on how the name change caused some controversy in the media when it was first announced is about all the air play it deserves. Has anyone seriously changed their mind about the merits of the console due to its name? Personally I was a little taken aback by the name for about 30 seconds and then I was intrigued about Nintendo's explanation of what the term represented and what that means for the intended audience for the console. /	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
50,750,287	The crash that so tragically claimed the life of Jim Reeves and hais Manager Dean Manual wa in fact so severe that it had partially buried the engine of the Beechcraft Debonair that Reeves was piloting at the time and indeed Reeves was identified by his drivers licence at the scene.	2,006	false	article	blocked	test	false
50,757,533	== pentagon: here we go again == I have just uploaded files 'pentagon1'-'pentagon4'. I think I have successfully found out the author of the photographs, though I don't know the licensing details. Please tell me whether any of these images are suitable for uploading on to the site. I emphasise I only want to add photographs and measurements of the crash site, therefore do not understand why this material should be labelled 'conspiracy theory'. Thank you	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
50,758,030	I have just uploaded files 'pentagon1'-'pentagon4'. I think I have successfully found out the author of the photographs, though I don't know the licensing details. Please tell me whether any of these images are suitable for uploading on to the site. I emphasise I only want to add photographs and measurements of the crash site, therefore do not understand why this material should be labelled 'conspiracy theory'. Thank you. And don't get me started on 'logical fallacies'. RichB111.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
50,763,216	AWWW GO HOME AND CRY TO MUMMY AWAWAWAWAWA SIGNED YOUR BLOODY WORST NIGHTMARE THE TYPEVANDAL	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	true
50,763,845	Oh Really ? hahahahahahahahahahhahahahhhahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhaahhahahahahaahaahhahaahhahahaha Signed the TypeVandal SOMEBODY STOP ME	2,006	false	user	blocked	dev	false
50,779,216	` == List of recent changes == Requested by Sarge Baldy, even though they've already been discussed extensively. # We don't need minutia about Cromwell in the intro. # This article is about the political meaning of anarchism ``the belief that forms of rulership are undesireable, and should be abolished.`` # We don't need the gobbletygook about ``degrees of commonality and conflict.`` # Please don't hide the fact that Proudhon was anti-communist. # Proudhon details should go in the Proudhon article, not here. # Anarchist ``schools`` should precede all the sundry issue-oriented sects. # Bullshit about misc. non-anarchist leftie movements don't belong in the [i]anarchism without adjectives[/i] paragraph. # Ancap books should not be censored.`	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
50,781,072	` :::?? Most anarchists recognize the existence and differences between individualist anarchists, anarcho-syndicalists, collectivist anarchists, anarcho-capitalists, etc. You are correct that most definitions use the word ``government,`` but you need to acknowledge that they mean ``state,`` and not simply voluntary governance. IOW when people use ``government`` they mean ``state`` in this context. See definitions above. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
50,786,740	`:::::::::I wasn't comparing you to David Duke anymore than saying ``the emperor has new clothes`` would be comparing the referent to an emperor. But if you want me to delete this subdiscussion I will. Do I have permission to delete your responses to it too so they aren't out of place? `	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
50,789,755	` == Canada and the War on Terrorism == Canada's waging its own War on Terrorism, Operation Apollo in Afghanistan. Should my country be added under the ``Primary participants`` or ``Other important figures``? - `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
50,802,980	Redirect Seriously, though, this is supposed to be an article about the school, I expected this article to contain information about the school itself and about the time when President Bush visited it during the 9/11 attacks. So, if a school is somehow related to 9/11 it's rendered worth less (or even worthless) for its own article?	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
50,807,054	::::::::::ok... thanks for ithe answer i see it now.. but i have 1 more question.. if alxy's dad is african american. why doesnt alyx apper to be african american?... please ytry not to get mad at questions.	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
50,810,787	==clean-up: any preferences?== This article needs a bit of a clean up as noted by Kjd and anon poster. There are a number of duplications but, more importantly, why do we have both a list and a table? Surely it's much better to have just one. I'd go for the list, I'll change it all soon (when I get a chance, do it yourself if you fancy it). Anyone any preferences for how to format it?	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
50,814,367	Tiger Sharks are damn weak! Great Whites are a whole lot better!	2,006	false	user	blocked	test	false
50,814,439	compared with Great Whites	2,006	false	user	blocked	test	false
50,817,752	== Hmm.. == Sorry, I just snapped since I have faced too many of those things, I think we need to start a bot to convert all censored words to their uncenrosed counterparts. )	2,006	false	user	blocked	dev	false
50,822,686	=== Introduction & the article === Hi new poster here, ive been following the article for a few weeks, I have reviewed the external links good and bad and have a few ideas. The controversy that surrounds this organization seems to be based between nichiren shoshu(in japan) and sgi(international) with alot of the groundwork coming from japan where the organizations originated from. After looking around and comparing to the other religions and sects, i propose we seperate the criticisms from each article and make a new article that, most likely, will be a cite war. The benefit is two-fold. First, the articles relating to each sect of buddhism talk about THAT buddhism, what they do, where they came from, etc etc, and not talk about the criticisms that anyone may have about them(similar to the anti-christianity criticism article and others). This is the most NPOV solution i can up with. Also, having a criticisms oriented paragraph in the intoduction seems extremely bias against an organization that promotes culture and peace(i have seen some demonstrations, nothing on a global scale or read about the political party, has anyone btw?) Secondly, in the split article section, the details can come out a little more clearly as they arent presented on the article talking about a buddhist sect, its an article about how the sect is impacting the world. It just seems a bit more accurate. Hopefully i will have a viable solution setup after i do some more reading about editing etc... Thoughts?	2,006	false	article	random	train	false
50,825,649	` :Forest, your suggestion is a good one. I took out the IMDb sources for the OOP film, but since the site is very accurate when it comes to talking about already released films, I cited Steve Kloves' page for the citation concerning his writing of the first four films' screenplays. '''' \| `	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
50,831,720	` == ``especially that of illegal immigrants`` == For the purposes of an Encyclopedia, shouldn't ``illegal immigrant`` be something else like ``undocumented worker``? `	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
50,837,747	Actually, dude, when I try to edit anything other than this page, I get the whole User is blocked page explaining what to do, etc.	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
50,846,951	I do not understand what I said that was not constructive.	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
50,854,426	**Forget it man you're talking to a proxy. Anyway thank you for the heliotrpism thing.	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
50,861,595	:The criticisms that Michael Danby is anti-Muslim are highly relevant in the article. Danby's neo-con POV has to be couner-balanced by other POVs, as stipulated by Wikipedia's WP:NPOV policy.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
50,861,708	` ::Stop making abusive edit summaries. My edits have nothing to do with ``LaRouche theories.`` They have everything to do with WP:NPOV. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
50,862,760	This article is a puff piece for Felix Rohatyn, a man many regard as a Nazi worm.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
50,867,027	== warnings????!?!?! == I have numerous warnings from you about vandilization and me being homophobic?????? I have NEVER written anything in wikipedia, why does it say that I have done all these horrible things???? I can't believe that someone would insult me on a personal level just because they assume I have done something; I am deeply hurt that you would call me homophobic- my college education is in defending people from discrimination, why on earth would i discriminate against anyone? I would also never think of vandalizing the site, i didn't even know i could delete or rewrite things on here! In using this website i understand that it is public opinion and not fact, and why would i have the right to change or vandalize anyone elses opinions and/or beliefs? If i don't agree w/ something on your site, i just go to another site that includes factual information to be used as a real reference. You have no right to resort to name-calling with customers of this site, how dare you!	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
50,870,658	:I wonder why its you that reacted on that line?	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
50,881,457	==NORTH?== Maryland is not a northern state because it is below the Mason-Dixon Line.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
50,887,213	**Yes! Good idea! (Do you want to put it up?) —	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
50,894,457	::::::Question? do you think of yourself as a troll? if not, could you explain why nearly all of your edits to this (and related) talk pages are trolling?	2,006	false	article	blocked	dev	false
50,906,763	==Split?== I do wonder if the Xeelee mention needs its own entry - it seems slightly tagged on the end here ( )	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
50,908,835	== Here we go again == Go on then, revert everything. What's wrong this time? I have added photographs and measurements of the crash site. If some of the licensing details etc are innappropriate, please tell me what I need to do/find out in order to correct this, instead of simply deleting them because they are 'conspiratorial'. I have removed the sentences making the claim that the aircraft's wings were forced into the building, because: 1)This is conjecture without evidence to support it, and should not be presented as fact. 2)It is physically impossible that the wings could have been broken off by an impact with a concrete wall, because (being fuel-filled and travelling at 250-300 miles per hour, their inertia would have been far greater than the wall's strength 3)Even if the wings had broken off (which is impossible) and been forced into the fueselage (which is also impossible as they are larger), the mass of the aircraft would still have been conserved, and absolutely could not have fitted into the dimensions of the crash site.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
50,910,986	```It has been frequently alleged that Bush skipped over a waiting list to receive a National Guard slot`` :um, he did skip over a waiting list to receive a national guard slot, even the GOP/FOX talking heads have never disputed this part, just the stuff that comes after it `	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
50,922,978	` (Th[e] [``question`` should be [framed] more neutral[ly]. - I have fixed that. )`	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
50,923,416	Just to make things perfectly clear, I happen to agree with you that most of these conspiracy theories are absurd, but it doesn't change the fact that you've clearly been trolling all 9-11 related talk pages	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
50,924,409	==Utilander / Uitlander== Hello, I see that you've set the Utilander/Utilanders articles to redirect to Uitlander. You will, of course, have noticed the speedy deletion request box. I requested the deletion over inserting a redirect because utilander is a simple spelling mistake, the correct, and only, spelling is uitlander. Through a spectacular mental block I created the article earlier today using that wrong spelling, not realising my mistake until it was created. I'm not really sure that it is appropriate for an article created in error to remain; it's not a question of an alternative spelling, mine was simply wrong. Regards,	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
50,937,578	` :Hi David, may I ask, did you post this at Jossi's request? Are you someone who's ever edited the Rawat articles? I think I recall a David at some point. Was that you? :In any event, while I agree with the general point that editors shouldn't be ``hunted down`` etc., is that really a fair way to characterize my asking an editor if he's ever been a paid publicist for the article's subject? Do you think that's an irrelevant question, especially in light of Jimbo Wales' saying just the other day that ideally articles shouldn't be edited by interested parties but that it was hard to know who was who given the ease with which people can be anonymous? Besides, Jossi's not anonymous, is he? :Sorry, but I find this confusing. Wales says Wikipedia's a free speech forum, Jossi says it isn't. It's all too subtle for me, I'm afraid. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
50,949,291	Congratulations, Jimbo, you deserve this!	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
50,961,057	OKAY ) SORRY I WON'T DO IT AGAIN!!!! IT'S JUST THAT THIS IP ADDRESS IS USED BY SO MANY PEOPLE!!!! THERE MUST BE SNEAKY VANDALS RUINING MY EDITS EVEN AS I MAKE THEM!!!! THANKS FOR BRINGING THIS TO MY ATTENTION )	2,006	false	user	blocked	dev	false
50,964,944	:::I laugh that you find cold hard stats deceiving, and that the rural counties of Maryland are desolate and therefore uninmportant. Wikipedia is not a place to espouse your agenda and its often illogical biases.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
50,973,981	Northern does not equal liberal as you imply. I sense an anti-rural bias here and it best not creep onto the main page.	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
50,975,613	:::What truth do you represent? And your statements imply that rural votes are not as important as beltway votes....please....take your agenda elsewhere.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
50,977,235	:: No I suppose I believe it, but it's part of the process to document everything. == Latest edit == The article now reads like a hit piece. I assume the quotes are factual and I have nothing against the quotes somewhere in the article, but more perspective is needed in the intro about who this guy is.	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
50,983,624	` == Naming Suggestion == In order to not be unclear of the article's name due to technical restrictions, we could move it to ``Apple iPod``. Just a thought. `	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
50,988,782	` ==remember the Essex?== ``JFW, I will observe that some folks are now crossing the Rubicon in haste (Tearlach's rush to block). I asked earlier for your help, I mean it sincerely. I think you have the stature and ability that could help me implement path 1. Even if it fails, you can say you tried. Path 2 is always available, and boringly easy.`` Can we talk? I am concerned these guys are going to get more whale than they dreamed of and nobody blamed nature the first time. But everybody else loses, just like the first time. I can think of little better way to prime an opponent than bloodying their nose this way. `	2,006	false	user	random	train	false
50,992,490	I dunno how bush can take credit for it, when according to the article Ike did back in the 50's	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
50,995,868	::I don't think they really conflict. Friedman, in that quotation, might give the impression that he is okay with whatever people in a given society want to do, but his exposition of his ideas elsewhere shows that he has a lot of pretty clear ideas about what that is or ought to be: he believes in property rights, the wrongness of murder, etc.; basically all that good stuff that Rothbard believes in. Rothbard does believe in a natural law, but, of course, he doesn't expect people to follow a natural law that they themselves don't believe in. So, as far as any society where anarcho-capitalism actually prevails, I think the Friedmanian vision and the Rothbardian are basically the same. ::In my experience some of the Rothbardian think there is a conflict between Rothbard and Friedman, but Friedman does not. -	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
51,004,511	=from thewolfstar= I did some research on the Scarborough and Lori Klausutis situation. I came up with some interesting information, indeed, and have edited the arcticle accordingly. It looks like there is need for an investigation, but Scarborough's part isn't what warrants the investigation. Scarborough, if I'm correct is the fall guy here. Please check these links (only a few) that are available. http://www.tomflocco.com/fs/911WidowQuestions.htm http://www.truthout.org/docs_01/01.05B.Klausutis.1.htm http://www.americanpolitics.com/20030721Baker.html	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
51,005,458	` :: I just went to the article which states Soon after her death, Scarborough complained about allegations ``spread all over the Internet`` that he had been involved. [1] Critics have complained about the handling of the investigation[2], the failure to release relevant records[3], and disputed Berkland's conclusions and his past.What's your point? Go to, especially the first reference I just listed here. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
51,009,744	` ==Last edit to wikitruth== I noticed in your last edit that you removed the ``Wikipedia Response`` segment from the Wikitruth article. Out of curiosity, why that response in particular, and not adding a sentnce describing its removal from the blacklist? I can't say that I fundamentally disagree, but it might be good to hash out whether it would be better to keep that segment in, in the interests of honesty and completeness. (By the way... your talk page is huge!) `	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
51,015,963	== ARFCOM link and subsequent revisions == I rewrote the intro and defensive weapons sections tonight after seeing the article linked from ar15.com. I tried to cut the fat out of the intro and just give the basic information which could be expanded on later in detail. In the defensive tools section I cut all the specific gun opinions to solve the above complaints about back and forth edits. I was pretty aggressive about removing text, so I guess we'll see what everybody thinks of it.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
51,019,651	== FOX 30 logos == Media:Example.oggThe two FOX 30 logos in question are fine to be added. I work at KCVU-TV, which is FOX 30. There should be no problem.	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
51,023,815	: Fuck off and rape your kids, Fenian bogtrotting shit. I hope the ones you love die in a cock accident. == Trepens Epichal == Hello, fat, ugly, lonely, smelly little boy. Only here can you conceit yourself human. Isn't that right, chum? Only here can you pretend you're liked, pretend you mean something, pretend you have some value in the eyes of the world, when really...you're a nothing. I am very disappointed.	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	true
51,035,113	==Sassalism== You are guilty of Sassalism, Samuel Blanning. You need to come to the G.A.S.D. and mop our floors.	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	true

50,598,536

== Sassalism == Please stop. If you continue to sass me, you will be taken back here to G.A.S.D. and forced to mop the floors. Richard A. Gulas, Principal G.A.S.D.

2,006

false

user

blocked

test

true

50,600,513

== Help needed == I needed some help with some articles on this subject and didn't see an obvious project page to put it on, so I'm putting the request here: is a highschool IP which has been making a large number of vandal edits but some productive ones as well. Recently, a large number of edits have occured to articles about football players, especially draft prospects, and I don't know enough to judge whether or not the information contained in them are correct. If someone else would take a look it would be appreciated. Thanks.

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

50,603,255

Is that a Chevy Avalanche on the cover as well?

2,006

false

article

blocked

dev

false

50,603,352

The current version is better but I've had a quick go at tidying it.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

50,605,000

::Sorry but I thoroughly disagree with the above. The only credible source that states Davis was Puerto Rican was Davis who hardly knew his own mother which is contradicted by her and her own living relatives. Also let me be clear that I am not Cuban and have no national interest in this I am just interested in us not placing more precedence on an unreliable source over well researched verifiable sources. There have been similar cases where celebrities have made claims on their ancestry which turn out to be wrong, [[John Kerry, Marlon Brando, Frida Kahlo are all examples so it is not an unusual thing at all.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

50,606,178

, 28 April 2006 (UTC) *In Hialeah, why should Interstate 75 and 80 be unique? All other interstates point to where the physical road ends. Saying Hiaheah is a suburb of Miami is like saying Oakland is a suburb of San Francisco. It's just not true. c 16:51

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

50,608,434

I apologize, but I couldn't find my sources online; I do most of my research at libraries. I'm looking for online parallels, however. Furthermore, I find it difficult to assume good faith in you, as you've given me no reason to. Now, I think a suspension of this argument would be best. I will contain myself if you will do the same.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

50,611,058

` == Request assistance deleting old talk page == Greetings. two of the Wikipedia Sysops (or whatevery you call them here), refuse to let me delete the content of my talk page, for reasons that go beyond my understanding. Some of the material in the talk page is personal. The page includes rough drafts with mistakes that I never intended to make permanent. Had I known I would not be allowed to delete this material, I would never have posted it in the first place. You recently archived part of the page, which is fine, of course. I told you at that time that I planned to clear the whole page, as I do from time to time. You raised no objection, and it never occured to me that anyone would object, but apparently these other two sysops do object. I would appreciate it if you could take steps to clear the page. If you want to keep a copy of any material there for your own purposes, please feel free to do so. For more information, see the message I am about to post here: User_talk:William_M._Connolley ``Please unblock and delete page.`` (I anticipate Mr. Connolley will block my access again after I post that message, so I am sending you this, first.) `

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

50,611,919

` In case Connolley deletes the message I sent him, here is a copy: :``I request that you unblock my ``talk page`` and immediately and permanently delete the contents of it. You are free to permanently block me from contributing to Wikipedia, as I have no intention of doing so in any case. If you would like a reason to block me, or prove that I have violated the rules, you need not preserve the talk page. Here is another deliberate & intentionally provocative violation of the rules an old-school personal insult: :You are a loathsome, sanctimonious, hypocritical, ignorant twit. If you were in state of uncontrolled combustion, I would not take the trouble to extinguish the flames by urinating on them. :I hope that is satisfactory. That should do the trick! `

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

50,611,957

` == Please unblock and delete page == I request that you unblock my ``talk page`` and immediately and permanently delete the contents of it. You are free to permanently block me from contributing to Wikipedia, as I have no intention of doing so in any case. If you would like a reason to block me, or prove that I have violated the rules, you need not preserve the talk page. Here is another deliberate & intentionally provocative violation of the rules an old-school personal insult: You are a loathsome, sanctimonious, hypocritical, ignorant twit. If you were in state of uncontrolled combustion, I would not take the trouble to extinguish the flames by urinating on them. I hope that is satisfactory. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

50,613,370

:::::That wasn't me. I never removed that sentence, and I am perfectly indifferent to it.

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

50,613,709

# Not sure how much weight my vote carries but i think BLEACH works better

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

50,614,583

, 28 April 2006 (UTC) :::Well the censue bureau has never been that smart. San Jose is infact the largest and prime city in that particular region and has been for 10 years, but the census guys still haven't gotten with the times on that either. In this case however I-75 ends 15 miles from the Miami city line, in Hialeah. Why beat around the bush? c 17:48

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

50,614,803

== Pembroke sucks.com == I am from the pembroke area and I found the link to pembroke sucks usefull and interesting. It is as far as I know the only forum dedicated to pembroke and the pembroke area. I say: as far as policy is concerned, coming on here everyday to remove a link that walks the line between usefull and not usefull is imho a little excesive. I understand that the people who run pembroke sucks also don't seem to know when enough is enough (I myself have removed large adds for their site from the pembroke article) and they should get the hint (like.. you don't own this site, and technically your link shouldn't be here. So why do you think it is somehow your right to post it?)but really.... its a link... its not even in the main body of the article. This is not a gateway to some larger problem. Let it go. stop being a link nazi. and stop posting your link where its not welcome. This is not one of the articles where links are used to support points of view (like on, i don't know, white power sites) so whats the big deal?

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

true

50,614,897

==Actual game section== This article needs sections on the game play this is as much a game as it is a story, come on people lets get down to it-Anon

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

50,616,535

:::Later, due to a corruption of the meaning, both the mounds and the supernatural entities (i.e. sprites) became known as the síd, modern Irish sídhe

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

50,620,232

` == Rothwell struggles in vain to withdraw from Wikipedia == This is somewhat off topic, but I was surprised to discover that a person is not allowed to withdraw from Wikipedia or delete the contents of his own talk page. Apparently it is cybernetic tar pit. Had I know it was against the rules to erase one's own talk page, I never would have talked there, since I frequently use it for things like unfinished manuscripts (which have embarrassing errors), jokes and so on, which were never intended to be permanent. Anyway, for the past day or so I have been trying to erase these comments without success. One of the Sysops here, Mr. Connolley apparently wishes to preserve this page because it includes proof that I have committed an egregious violation of the rules, by calling someone: “childish, boorish, pig headed [and] unreasonable” and earlier “an insufferable ninny.” The poor fellow was so overcome by grief & consternation, he felt compelled to report this outrage to the authorities. (I might also call him a crybaby or a tattletale, but he would die of shock. I have done enough damage already; I fear he may need long-term therapy.) Anyway, I was banned for this unspeakable language, and Connelley will not even allow me to purge the evidence of my shame. I changed my description page and sent a message to Connelley with damning evidence for him to use in place of my talk page. I fear he may revert both, and delete this message, but before he does readers here may be amused by the new text here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JedRothwell I quote Schiller's warning: ``Mit der Dummheit kaempfen Goetter selbst vergebens.`` ('Against stupidity the gods themselves struggle in vain.') (Maid of Orleans, act 3, sc. 6). Hence, the title of this message. Thick-skinned readers here might also enjoy the egregious replacement insult I sent to Connelly: :. . . If you would like a reason to block me, or prove that I have violated the rules, you need not preserve the talk page. Here is another deliberate & intentionally provocative violation of the rules an old-school personal insult: :You are a loathsome, sanctimonious, hypocritical, ignorant twit. If you were in state of uncontrolled combustion, I would not take the trouble to extinguish the flames by urinating on them. :I hope that is satisfactory. That goes for you, too, Mr. . . uh, Chihuahua – isn’t it? Bow wow! Ruff! Grrrrr . . . Consider yourself gravely insulted. If this were the 18th century you might challenge me to a duel, but since I am a craven bounder, I would, of course, run away instead of accepting. Believe me, I am trying to get away, without success so far. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

true

50,621,511

*Ah, thank you for the tip.

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

50,651,703

::I agree with Davidnortman's remarks above.

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

50,653,952

I agree- it was one of the most frugal cars. The 1.0 gets about 38MPG in town at rush hour! I bet the Americans wish they could get that now petrol or gasoline has reached the staggering amount of 40pence sterling per litre!

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

50,654,878

stop playing with anal beads. its disgusting.

2,006

false

user

blocked

dev

false

50,657,715

`::::::::::You go wrong as soon as you say ``unless it is documented in some way with names, dates and places``. That's not how Wikipedia works, and we are expressedly forbidden from doing that by Wikipedia:No original research. Further, it is not even necessary to have those things to accept what someone says about their ancestry—only, we have to accurately report that they said this, not that they are what they said. Of course, if we have no source for them saying it, we can't even say that much. This is actually a really straight-forward case as far as the policy is concerned. — `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

50,661,516

Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Your test to Stupidity worked, and has been reverted or removed, but please continue to be bold! Editors are always happy to correct or revert mistakes and discuss changes with which they disagree, though if you want to make further tests, you should use the sandbox. Here are some other links you might find useful: *The tutorial *How to edit a page *How to write a great article And for more detailed information: *Help pages - the instruction manual, contains everything you could possibly want to know *The five pillars of Wikipedia - our principles, or how to get on with other editors *Manual of Style - how to format articles, where to place pictures, and other stylistic matters. You can also check out the community portal, which has lots of ideas on how you can help Wikipedia. All of this information can be daunting, but if you have a question and can't find the answer, you can always ask on or go to Wikipedia:Where to ask a question. One last thing: please sign your name when leaving messages for others on article and user talk pages using (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. I hope you enjoy editing!

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

50,663,533

` : I don't really understand your aggressive attitude. The only person I could be certain of hearing from about the Paris article is you. Call Metroplolitan an 'oubli'. As for the rest and the tone of all this, I find it to be quite overheated, provocating and quite immature - if you are indeed a partisan of reason, I suggest you find another approach. `

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

50,664,800

`:::::I think that picking at the word ``team`` is a little excessive. Wiktionary defines team as: any group of people involved in the same activity. So the word team doesn't imply any level of organization at all. Also, the word ``international`` isn't describing anything more glorious than the fact that all the people are from differant nations(In Wiktionary: Of or having to do with more than one nation). Just because it sounds more impressive than saying ``we got guys from all over`` doesn't mean its false or has to be edited out. I don't know about using the title archeologist though. So I wwould have to say that a french and american coming to your yard to investigate are an international team (assuming they work together in some way) `

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

50,667,470

:Even if I'm leaving this bullshit of Wikipedia forever, I will observe as well what kind of negotiations you will be able to do here, since you began to talk here about gays and Catholic/Orthodox Chuch, instead of caring of this fucked-ass article. Let me tell you a last thing: if you all will continue on this way, you will solve nothing and never. I hope the only 2-3 users here that are logical and know what's the Romanian diaspora will succeed. Good luck to them... P.S> you have motivation to be happy now when I'm leaving (to:Anittas, Ronline, Constantzeanu, Greier and many others) '''''' 28 April 2006

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

50,667,682

:I deliberately chose the better known and more important (from an operational standpoint) Marshals who had decent portraits avalable. Obviously, not everyone could be selected. Objections were raised in peer review that this section was too heavy on pictures and too light on text. Augereau's picture was unfortunately deleted. Lefebvre, quite honestly, was more of a political appointee than an impressive commander in the field. Suchet is more obscure and a somewhat late appointee, but a fine commander nevertheless. The gallant Poniatowski was promoted posthumously. Saint-Cyr is not obscure, but he was a later Marshal and really was not so important in the grande scheme of things, his reputation being largely created by his own post war writings and activities. But I tell you what, let's open up four more slots in the Marshal's gallery. I recommend they be filled by Bessières, Mortier, Poniatowski and either Saint-Cyr or Suchet (depending on whether you prefer a show horse or a warhorse:)

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

50,667,762

I think we should add some tags and get rid of some of the crap.

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

50,669,026

Many of us used to think of you guys as simply D.P.s. I, on the other hand, had the experience of having wound up with neighborsw who were some strain of Serbo/Slavic. They turned out to be just like dagos.

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

50,674,059

` :::::Actually, show me where ``bad faith`` is marked as a reason for a speedy keep. `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

50,682,198

::Hey, at least that statement has a citation. That's better than a lot of the statements on this page.

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

50,693,832

` ::::::::And are you saying we shouldn't call him a ``serial murderer`` because that is a pejorative term? No, we'll call him a serial killer because that is what he is commonly called, and because there is objective evidence that he killed many people. If he was also a child entertainer then we should also apply that category. - `

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

50,694,760

` : I have responded. e `

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

50,699,225

:Read it. Not sure what I'm looking for but thanks for the read.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

50,699,795

== External links to be Arranged == It's a bit unwieldly of a list, and I thought that it would look a whole lot neater should the segments therein be divided into usual categories in pertinance thereto..

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

50,709,807

It is you, who is arguing in a neo-ricardian framework. The difference between you and other Neo-ricardians is that you claim that there is only one basic commodity, namely labor, thinking thereby to save the LTV, whereas other Neoricardians would claim, that besides labor there are other basic commodities, thereby questioning the importance of the LTV and the consequences Marx drew from it. A corn theorist, for instance, is a Neo-Ricardian, who claims that besides labor also corn is a basic commodity. Against this reo-ricardian reasoning some Marxists argue (who are then of course no reo-ricardians), that it is the common social substance (see quote of Marx in the article!) and not the physical or technical substance that matters, for the rest see end of article.

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

50,711,182

:: Are you aware that according to , does not support this change either?

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

50,711,269

`Is the Lincoln Gould that just edited this article the same Lincoln Gould that is the CEO of the NPA? Noting that the ``NPA is the umbrella rganisation for commonly owned newspaper industry service providers. These bodies include the Newspaper Advertising Bureau (NAB), New Zealand Press Association (NZPA) and NZPA Content Services``NPA Information about Newspapers - should Mr Gould really be editing this article? I note that along with substantial changes to the article these included the significant removoval of references to NZPA pulling out of London. `

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

50,717,161

` == Re the whole de-bureaucrating thing == Hi, I never came to thank you for the message you left for me a month ago when I stepped down from being a bureaucrat. Thank you for the things you said, it's good to know there are still plenty of good people about in this project. I do not see myself standing for bureaucrat again anytime soon though who knows what the future may bring! Thank you once again. `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

50,724,831

== Barnstar - Simming Organization == . - ]]

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

50,725,513

`== AP competitors == AP is competing in an increasingly saturated market. Agence France Press? Xinhua? New York Times (+ International Herald Tribune)? : Except for Reuters, AP has no real English-language competition; the other services you name dominate in other languages. I know of no American papers that subscribe solely to the NYTimes and/or Washington Post News services without also subscribing to AP. AP is cheaper and far broader as far as breaking news goes. == History of AP, Brass Check == To a Minister of Truth: I suggest Brass Check is a good book for the state of the AP at the turn of the century - there's more to it than Teletypes, after all. And if AP again has a monopoly on wire-servicing (in the animal-husbandry sense) the US public [just how is the UPI comment to be interpreted?], how that has played out in the past ought to be of interest. Especially since the AP is the sole collator of ``election`` ``results`` tomorrow. And if you protest Brass Check is not about the AP, I'll point out the older Library of Congress catalogue entries list ``Associated Press`` as one of its categories. 00:52, 2004 Nov 2 (UTC) (PS: count y'self lucky I merely mentioned the book, and didn't start rewriting the article.) : There are many, many books about the history of U.S. journalism that contain information about AP which might be of interest to this article, but ``Brass Check`` isn't one of them. It is wildly out of date (especially if you think it has relevance to the current situation; when it was written, AP was a struggling underdog). But of course you are welcome to start rewriting the article - that's the way Wikipedia works! - :: So put some of THOSE books in, fer cryin out loud. (wait. what? How can what is for years an indebted monopoly spreading completely inverted or entirely fabricated news with impunity qualify as ``struggling underdog``?) Incidentally, check history (unless WP has discarded it for lack of space) I am not welcome, even when what I write is well-supported. As a for instance: Nurse Nayirah. (I do not contest that this is because of a certain immoderateness in my writing: after the outrage I've watched go on just the past four years - thanks in part to a US press that, in what counts, lies and covers up as baldly as Sinclair described 85 years ago - I cannot be moderate. If there were moderates taking my place I'd be happy; but so many waste themselves on absolute bread-and-circus garbage like American Idle.) I limit login now to when I express something that's only my opinion. 23:13, 2004 Nov 2 (UTC) ::Oh, I forgot to mention: someone thinks Brass Check interesting enough that the U of Illinois Press reprinted it about two years ago (ISBN 0252071107) 02:51, 2004 Nov 3 (UTC) AP's television service is now known as APTN Note: The picture on the main entry page shows the AP's old headquarters in Rockefeller Center. The company has since moved to Manhattan's West Side. == Retracted Stories == If we're going to list every retracted story that AP, or any other wire service, has run over the years, we're going to have to double the size of wikipedia! So I removed the long, rambling account of one such case, since it lacked context. Discussion about the merits, or lack thereof, of the wire service are certainly valuable additions to the article, but not in the form of a rant. - == Explanation of AP fees == This was originally posted on the Reference Desk with the title ``Is news public domain?`` It seems from the public domain article that facts are in the public domain, but reporting of them may not be. A news agency might do a lot of work to collect some news and expect just compensation. So how is it that news stories can be ``picked up`` by competing agencies, e.g., the Associated Press picking up a story in a local newspaper? Isn't that local news story under copyright? Is there a fee involved or some sort of professional agreement? Thanks. 15:10, 2004 Nov 16 (UTC) :As you can see from the article on the AP, it's owned by its contributing newspapers. A local newspaper allows its stories to be used by the AP because it has the opportunity to use AP wire stories itself. So, the answer is that the news story is certainly under copyright, and the only fees/professional arrangements involved are the money and agreements necessary to maintain the AP. -) [[User:Jwrosenzweig|Jwrosen

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

50,729,303

Hi, Ainsy. Thanks for joining wikipedia. The reason why your article is being considered for deletion is because it's not encyclopedic. Don't take it personally. Anyway, welcome to the encyclopedia. I'm not officially part of the welcoming crew, but I'll give you the official welcome anyway. - Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: *The five pillars of Wikipedia *How to edit a page *Help pages *Tutorial *How to write a great article *Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

50,738,542

April 2006 (UTC) :Who cares what some noname web critics have to say? Critics have canned all sorts of innovations such as the graphics in Windwaker, the audience for Nintendogs and the extra screen on the DS. I'm more interested in the gameplay than whether it is called wii or bum or whatever. A rose by any other name... / 14:12, 29

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

50,739,248

can A Perfect Circle be removed from thelist of nu metal bands then?

2,006

false

article

random

train

false

50,741,653

:I did not produce the plot, but it seems that for each parameter value of the map the orbit points are plotted. I would prefer the expression orbit diagram, but bifurcation diagram is common usage. Many of the plotted points are close to unstable periodic orbits, so in some sense there are unstable points in the diagram. —

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

50,745,721

==Re: Sam Spade RFA== Hi. I'd be happy to comment on my past experience with Sam, but I haven't had any first-hand dealings with him for quite a long time now, so I'm not sure I'm the best person to bring an RFA against him.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

50,745,854

== POV tag == I've removed the POV tag since there is no feedback here as to how the article lacks POV. I wish people would stop bitching about the name. This is an encyclopedia; a brief comment on how the name change caused some controversy in the media when it was first announced is about all the air play it deserves. Has anyone seriously changed their mind about the merits of the console due to its name? Personally I was a little taken aback by the name for about 30 seconds and then I was intrigued about Nintendo's explanation of what the term represented and what that means for the intended audience for the console. /

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

50,750,287

The crash that so tragically claimed the life of Jim Reeves and hais Manager Dean Manual wa in fact so severe that it had partially buried the engine of the Beechcraft Debonair that Reeves was piloting at the time and indeed Reeves was identified by his drivers licence at the scene.

2,006

false

article

blocked

test

false

50,757,533

== pentagon: here we go again == I have just uploaded files 'pentagon1'-'pentagon4'. I think I have successfully found out the author of the photographs, though I don't know the licensing details. Please tell me whether any of these images are suitable for uploading on to the site. I emphasise I only want to add photographs and measurements of the crash site, therefore do not understand why this material should be labelled 'conspiracy theory'. Thank you

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

50,758,030

I have just uploaded files 'pentagon1'-'pentagon4'. I think I have successfully found out the author of the photographs, though I don't know the licensing details. Please tell me whether any of these images are suitable for uploading on to the site. I emphasise I only want to add photographs and measurements of the crash site, therefore do not understand why this material should be labelled 'conspiracy theory'. Thank you. And don't get me started on 'logical fallacies'. RichB111.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

50,763,216

AWWW GO HOME AND CRY TO MUMMY AWAWAWAWAWA SIGNED YOUR BLOODY WORST NIGHTMARE THE TYPEVANDAL

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

true

50,763,845

Oh Really ? hahahahahahahahahahhahahahhhahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhaahhahahahahaahaahhahaahhahahaha Signed the TypeVandal SOMEBODY STOP ME

2,006

false

user

blocked

dev

false

50,779,216

` == List of recent changes == Requested by Sarge Baldy, even though they've already been discussed extensively. # We don't need minutia about Cromwell in the intro. # This article is about the political meaning of anarchism ``the belief that forms of rulership are undesireable, and should be abolished.`` # We don't need the gobbletygook about ``degrees of commonality and conflict.`` # Please don't hide the fact that Proudhon was anti-communist. # Proudhon details should go in the Proudhon article, not here. # Anarchist ``schools`` should precede all the sundry issue-oriented sects. # Bullshit about misc. non-anarchist leftie movements don't belong in the [i]anarchism without adjectives[/i] paragraph. # Ancap books should not be censored.`

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

50,781,072

` :::?? Most anarchists recognize the existence and differences between individualist anarchists, anarcho-syndicalists, collectivist anarchists, anarcho-capitalists, etc. You are correct that most definitions use the word ``government,`` but you need to acknowledge that they mean ``state,`` and not simply voluntary governance. IOW when people use ``government`` they mean ``state`` in this context. See definitions above. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

50,786,740

`:::::::::I wasn't comparing you to David Duke anymore than saying ``the emperor has new clothes`` would be comparing the referent to an emperor. But if you want me to delete this subdiscussion I will. Do I have permission to delete your responses to it too so they aren't out of place? `

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

50,789,755

` == Canada and the War on Terrorism == Canada's waging its own War on Terrorism, Operation Apollo in Afghanistan. Should my country be added under the ``Primary participants`` or ``Other important figures``? - `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

50,802,980

Redirect Seriously, though, this is supposed to be an article about the school, I expected this article to contain information about the school itself and about the time when President Bush visited it during the 9/11 attacks. So, if a school is somehow related to 9/11 it's rendered worth less (or even worthless) for its own article?

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

50,807,054

::::::::::ok... thanks for ithe answer i see it now.. but i have 1 more question.. if alxy's dad is african american. why doesnt alyx apper to be african american?... please ytry not to get mad at questions.

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

50,810,787

==clean-up: any preferences?== This article needs a bit of a clean up as noted by Kjd and anon poster. There are a number of duplications but, more importantly, why do we have both a list and a table? Surely it's much better to have just one. I'd go for the list, I'll change it all soon (when I get a chance, do it yourself if you fancy it). Anyone any preferences for how to format it?

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

50,814,367

Tiger Sharks are damn weak! Great Whites are a whole lot better!

2,006

false

user

blocked

test

false

50,814,439

compared with Great Whites

2,006

false

user

blocked

test

false

50,817,752

== Hmm.. == Sorry, I just snapped since I have faced too many of those things, I think we need to start a bot to convert all censored words to their uncenrosed counterparts. )

2,006

false

user

blocked

dev

false

50,822,686

=== Introduction & the article === Hi new poster here, ive been following the article for a few weeks, I have reviewed the external links good and bad and have a few ideas. The controversy that surrounds this organization seems to be based between nichiren shoshu(in japan) and sgi(international) with alot of the groundwork coming from japan where the organizations originated from. After looking around and comparing to the other religions and sects, i propose we seperate the criticisms from each article and make a new article that, most likely, will be a cite war. The benefit is two-fold. First, the articles relating to each sect of buddhism talk about THAT buddhism, what they do, where they came from, etc etc, and not talk about the criticisms that anyone may have about them(similar to the anti-christianity criticism article and others). This is the most NPOV solution i can up with. Also, having a criticisms oriented paragraph in the intoduction seems extremely bias against an organization that promotes culture and peace(i have seen some demonstrations, nothing on a global scale or read about the political party, has anyone btw?) Secondly, in the split article section, the details can come out a little more clearly as they arent presented on the article talking about a buddhist sect, its an article about how the sect is impacting the world. It just seems a bit more accurate. Hopefully i will have a viable solution setup after i do some more reading about editing etc... Thoughts?

2,006

false

article

random

train

false

50,825,649

` :Forest, your suggestion is a good one. I took out the IMDb sources for the OOP film, but since the site is very accurate when it comes to talking about already released films, I cited Steve Kloves' page for the citation concerning his writing of the first four films' screenplays. '''' | `

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

50,831,720

` == ``especially that of illegal immigrants`` == For the purposes of an Encyclopedia, shouldn't ``illegal immigrant`` be something else like ``undocumented worker``? `

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

50,837,747

Actually, dude, when I try to edit anything other than this page, I get the whole User is blocked page explaining what to do, etc.

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

50,846,951

I do not understand what I said that was not constructive.

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

50,854,426

**Forget it man you're talking to a proxy. Anyway thank you for the heliotrpism thing.

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

50,861,595

:The criticisms that Michael Danby is anti-Muslim are highly relevant in the article. Danby's neo-con POV has to be couner-balanced by other POVs, as stipulated by Wikipedia's WP:NPOV policy.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

50,861,708

` ::Stop making abusive edit summaries. My edits have nothing to do with ``LaRouche theories.`` They have everything to do with WP:NPOV. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

50,862,760

This article is a puff piece for Felix Rohatyn, a man many regard as a Nazi worm.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

50,867,027

== warnings????!?!?! == I have numerous warnings from you about vandilization and me being homophobic?????? I have NEVER written anything in wikipedia, why does it say that I have done all these horrible things???? I can't believe that someone would insult me on a personal level just because they assume I have done something; I am deeply hurt that you would call me homophobic- my college education is in defending people from discrimination, why on earth would i discriminate against anyone? I would also never think of vandalizing the site, i didn't even know i could delete or rewrite things on here! In using this website i understand that it is public opinion and not fact, and why would i have the right to change or vandalize anyone elses opinions and/or beliefs? If i don't agree w/ something on your site, i just go to another site that includes factual information to be used as a real reference. You have no right to resort to name-calling with customers of this site, how dare you!

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

50,870,658

:I wonder why its you that reacted on that line?

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

50,881,457

==NORTH?== Maryland is not a northern state because it is below the Mason-Dixon Line.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

50,887,213

**Yes! Good idea! (Do you want to put it up?) —

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

50,894,457

::::::Question? do you think of yourself as a troll? if not, could you explain why nearly all of your edits to this (and related) talk pages are trolling?

2,006

false

article

blocked

dev

false

50,906,763

==Split?== I do wonder if the Xeelee mention needs its own entry - it seems slightly tagged on the end here ( )

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

50,908,835

== Here we go again == Go on then, revert everything. What's wrong this time? I have added photographs and measurements of the crash site. If some of the licensing details etc are innappropriate, please tell me what I need to do/find out in order to correct this, instead of simply deleting them because they are 'conspiratorial'. I have removed the sentences making the claim that the aircraft's wings were forced into the building, because: 1)This is conjecture without evidence to support it, and should not be presented as fact. 2)It is physically impossible that the wings could have been broken off by an impact with a concrete wall, because (being fuel-filled and travelling at 250-300 miles per hour, their inertia would have been far greater than the wall's strength 3)Even if the wings had broken off (which is impossible) and been forced into the fueselage (which is also impossible as they are larger), the mass of the aircraft would still have been conserved, and absolutely could not have fitted into the dimensions of the crash site.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

50,910,986

```It has been frequently alleged that Bush skipped over a waiting list to receive a National Guard slot`` :um, he did skip over a waiting list to receive a national guard slot, even the GOP/FOX talking heads have never disputed this part, just the stuff that comes after it `

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

50,922,978

` (Th[e] [``question`` should be [framed] more neutral[ly]. - I have fixed that. )`

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

50,923,416

Just to make things perfectly clear, I happen to agree with you that most of these conspiracy theories are absurd, but it doesn't change the fact that you've clearly been trolling all 9-11 related talk pages

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

50,924,409

==Utilander / Uitlander== Hello, I see that you've set the Utilander/Utilanders articles to redirect to Uitlander. You will, of course, have noticed the speedy deletion request box. I requested the deletion over inserting a redirect because utilander is a simple spelling mistake, the correct, and only, spelling is uitlander. Through a spectacular mental block I created the article earlier today using that wrong spelling, not realising my mistake until it was created. I'm not really sure that it is appropriate for an article created in error to remain; it's not a question of an alternative spelling, mine was simply wrong. Regards,

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

50,937,578

` :Hi David, may I ask, did you post this at Jossi's request? Are you someone who's ever edited the Rawat articles? I think I recall a David at some point. Was that you? :In any event, while I agree with the general point that editors shouldn't be ``hunted down`` etc., is that really a fair way to characterize my asking an editor if he's ever been a paid publicist for the article's subject? Do you think that's an irrelevant question, especially in light of Jimbo Wales' saying just the other day that ideally articles shouldn't be edited by interested parties but that it was hard to know who was who given the ease with which people can be anonymous? Besides, Jossi's not anonymous, is he? :Sorry, but I find this confusing. Wales says Wikipedia's a free speech forum, Jossi says it isn't. It's all too subtle for me, I'm afraid. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

50,949,291

Congratulations, Jimbo, you deserve this!

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

50,961,057

OKAY ) SORRY I WON'T DO IT AGAIN!!!! IT'S JUST THAT THIS IP ADDRESS IS USED BY SO MANY PEOPLE!!!! THERE MUST BE SNEAKY VANDALS RUINING MY EDITS EVEN AS I MAKE THEM!!!! THANKS FOR BRINGING THIS TO MY ATTENTION )

2,006

false

user

blocked

dev

false

50,964,944

:::I laugh that you find cold hard stats deceiving, and that the rural counties of Maryland are desolate and therefore uninmportant. Wikipedia is not a place to espouse your agenda and its often illogical biases.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

50,973,981

Northern does not equal liberal as you imply. I sense an anti-rural bias here and it best not creep onto the main page.

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

50,975,613

:::What truth do you represent? And your statements imply that rural votes are not as important as beltway votes....please....take your agenda elsewhere.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

50,977,235

:: No I suppose I believe it, but it's part of the process to document everything. == Latest edit == The article now reads like a hit piece. I assume the quotes are factual and I have nothing against the quotes somewhere in the article, but more perspective is needed in the intro about who this guy is.

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

50,983,624

` == Naming Suggestion == In order to not be unclear of the article's name due to technical restrictions, we could move it to ``Apple iPod``. Just a thought. `

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

50,988,782

` ==remember the Essex?== ``JFW, I will observe that some folks are now crossing the Rubicon in haste (Tearlach's rush to block). I asked earlier for your help, I mean it sincerely. I think you have the stature and ability that could help me implement path 1. Even if it fails, *you* can say you tried. Path 2 is always available, and boringly easy.`` Can we talk? I am concerned these guys are going to get more whale than they dreamed of and nobody blamed nature the first time. But everybody else loses, just like the first time. I can think of little better way to prime an opponent than bloodying their nose this way. `

2,006

false

user

random

train

false

50,992,490

I dunno how bush can take credit for it, when according to the article Ike did back in the 50's

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

50,995,868

::I don't think they really conflict. Friedman, in that quotation, might give the impression that he is okay with whatever people in a given society want to do, but his exposition of his ideas elsewhere shows that he has a lot of pretty clear ideas about what that is or ought to be: he believes in property rights, the wrongness of murder, etc.; basically all that good stuff that Rothbard believes in. Rothbard does believe in a natural law, but, of course, he doesn't expect people to follow a natural law that they themselves don't believe in. So, as far as any society where anarcho-capitalism actually prevails, I think the Friedmanian vision and the Rothbardian are basically the same. ::In my experience some of the Rothbardian think there is a conflict between Rothbard and Friedman, but Friedman does not. -

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

51,004,511

=from thewolfstar= I did some research on the Scarborough and Lori Klausutis situation. I came up with some interesting information, indeed, and have edited the arcticle accordingly. It looks like there is need for an investigation, but Scarborough's part isn't what warrants the investigation. Scarborough, if I'm correct is the fall guy here. Please check these links (only a few) that are available. http://www.tomflocco.com/fs/911WidowQuestions.htm http://www.truthout.org/docs_01/01.05B.Klausutis.1.htm http://www.americanpolitics.com/20030721Baker.html

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

51,005,458

` :: I just went to the article which states Soon after her death, Scarborough complained about allegations ``spread all over the Internet`` that he had been involved. [1] Critics have complained about the handling of the investigation[2], the failure to release relevant records[3], and disputed Berkland's conclusions and his past.What's your point? Go to, especially the first reference I just listed here. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

51,009,744

` ==Last edit to wikitruth== I noticed in your last edit that you removed the ``Wikipedia Response`` segment from the Wikitruth article. Out of curiosity, why that response in particular, and not adding a sentnce describing its removal from the blacklist? I can't say that I fundamentally disagree, but it might be good to hash out whether it would be better to keep that segment in, in the interests of honesty and completeness. (By the way... your talk page is huge!) `

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

51,015,963

== ARFCOM link and subsequent revisions == I rewrote the intro and defensive weapons sections tonight after seeing the article linked from ar15.com. I tried to cut the fat out of the intro and just give the basic information which could be expanded on later in detail. In the defensive tools section I cut all the specific gun opinions to solve the above complaints about back and forth edits. I was pretty aggressive about removing text, so I guess we'll see what everybody thinks of it.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

51,019,651

== FOX 30 logos == Media:Example.oggThe two FOX 30 logos in question are fine to be added. I work at KCVU-TV, which is FOX 30. There should be no problem.

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

51,023,815

: Fuck off and rape your kids, Fenian bogtrotting shit. I hope the ones you love die in a cock accident. == Trepens Epichal == Hello, fat, ugly, lonely, smelly little boy. Only here can you conceit yourself human. Isn't that right, chum? Only here can you pretend you're liked, pretend you mean something, pretend you have some value in the eyes of the world, when really...you're a nothing. I am very disappointed.

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

true

51,035,113

==Sassalism== You are guilty of Sassalism, Samuel Blanning. You need to come to the G.A.S.D. and mop our floors.

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

true