dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
51,039,811	Yeah, that's what's happened. I actually did revert myself when I saw what you had done, as it didn't show up straight away in my browser, but I see it must have come up with an edit clash when you done the same thing at the same time, and I didn't notice.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
51,043,944	== Teracotta Pie! == Why don't you ask the kids at Tinammen square, was fashion the reason why they were there. Terracotta pie HEY! terracotta pie. HEY! Terracotta pie. HEY! Terracota pie!	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
51,044,456	I rock! I rock! So Drini, who is hotter? Me or Pamela Anderson?	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
51,045,217	I'm sorry about my editing. I'm new to this site so, can you help me?	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
51,061,161	Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.4lawschool.com/conlaw/council.shtml. As a copyright violation, Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. ''''	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
51,066,735	Which one has a more distinct taste?	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
51,068,826	According to MedlinePlus, cardiovascular diseases are linked to sleeping disorders. Also, sleeping for less than 6 hours regularily more than doulbles the risk of hypertension. (KEM)	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
51,069,364	= from the wolfstar = Concerning this paragraph under Ideological base:The Party advocates civil liberties, social freedoms, equal rights, equal opportunity, and a free enterprise system tempered by government intervention. The Party believes that government should play a role in alleviating poverty and social injustice, even if that means progressive taxation and a larger role for government. I have pointed out the lack of fact in this statement lots of times. I have changed it on the article page and documented why I changed it. I have asked for comments from others concerning it and have gotten maybe one response to it, long ago. Prove it, please. Or at least show how it is fact. Show how, The Party advocates civil liberties... Just do it.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
51,069,937	'''Hey, dudes. Can someone actually click one of links above and comment on the information?	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
51,084,935	Thanks, Bjsiders for your reply. Okay, here is what I define as civil liberties..the same thing that the Bill of Rights defines as civil liberties. Here are two of those liberties not defended by the Democrats. * freedom of speech ** not defended by Democrats. Democrats tend to jump on people who say offensive things, (offensive how, or to whom) is guess what.. the Democrats! They tend to jump on people who do not use what they consider to be the current politically correct lingo. People have lost their jobs because of this sort of thing. freedom of speech is a right. A God given right enforced in our Constitution. * the right to bear arms. ** Obviously, the right to bear arms torn down by their own admission.Please see article page 'crime and gun control under Democrat Party Stances http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_%28United_States%29 The right to from a militia and the right to bear arms Shall not be infringed This seems pretty clear and simple to me. The right to defend ourselves against tyranny. Another God given and therfore inalienable right. I hope I haven't offended too many Democrats by using the word God in public. Thanks for actually reading this and applying thought to it. Maggie	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
51,087,933	` ::Failing to see the point doesn't validate the change to King of Britain or British King or ``whatever`` backs up Damac in his flame war. ::Accuracy in this matter lies in reporting how the congressmen & media of the time referenced the ``Russell case``. That is what is being laid out in the article- not the pedantic rights and wrongs of the title assumed by monarchs throughout history. Should I reference Eire as the Republic of Ireland despite Hoare's understanding of it as 'Eire'? According to your logic that would also make sense. ::Certainly I can make mistakes, and its fine if Damac chooses to correct inaccurate spelling/punctuation to accurate, but I do stick to what I know. What speaks volumes to me that the articles on IRA/German intelligence & S-plan have laid untouched by Damac since he signed up. He has only shown interest in them after I corrected his work. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
51,088,832	I Fucked Your Mom Last Night. It Felt Awsome. I stuck My dick in her mouth and in her pussy. she let me lick her tits and fuck her all night long. YEEEEEEEEE HAAAAAAAAA is what i was screaming.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	true
51,089,638	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_U.S._immigration_reform_protests Please go to that article. After you do that, come back to this artcle. Both articles are based on the same event, the Boycotts by Immigrants across the country.	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
51,090,628	` :::Fine, change the goal posts to suit. No problem. Considering the support he can whip up for his agenda, i'll do my best to make future contributions ``Damac proof`` before posting. Just don't be suprised if more of his bogus edits of serious contributions cause problems. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
51,092,637	::Since it was not a speedy candidate and should not have been deleted as such, I took the liberty of recreating the list. If you feel it doesn't belong, then list it for normal deletion.	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
51,096,987	:::Threats to block me from editing wikipedia now. Well done Damac- your baiting and harassment campaign paid off! Oh, when you block me? please revert all the articles i've contributed to back to the state they were in before I completed work on them. Be Bold! :::Blocking me would have the bonus of somewhat preventing Damac exercising his flair for harassment and baiting of serious contributors however. Of particular enjoyment to me where his accusations of copyright infringement and plagarism- mentioned on wikipedia:civility? Funny though how Damac's allegations, the campaign of officious & inaccurate 'editing' (really just rearranging my efforts) he unleashed, the spamming of my talk page desipte requests not to, and the constant snipes aimed at baiting & harassment seem to be perfectly acceptable.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
51,098,624	==He's at it again...=== He's quietly moving all CA route pages. c	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
51,103,513	::Further example of Damac's campaign to bait & harass under another article I created Operation Lobster I. He/she added in redundant information to break up the flow of the article naturally Damac was careful not to be signed in when the change was made.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
51,105,511	` :::RE: Damac's claims not to have used to phrase ``King of Britain`` :::Lie. Check my Talk page where he apologises for using the Phrase ``King of Britain`` and admits it was wrong and I was right to remove it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fluffy999 `	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
51,109,387	` :::My first and most important question, DMC. Whom are you calling ``administrator`` here? Is Irpen an admin? (No trick questions, I was out for half a year) `	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
51,112,096	::Damac you have changed the Edit summary somehow. Your denial of first making the edit, then ever having used the term, and now trying to make out that it was all a typo is laughable. How you are able to edit out your edit from the edit summary I don't know yet but thats something admins can probably speak to- i'm just the victim of this nutter's hate campaign.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
51,113,730	`::::Great, fine, no problem. Change the article. I have no problem should you introduce cited, backed up research. If Hull is wrong, say so, but back it up with credible sourced material proving your case- don't just blunder in, delete and overwrite valid material in context with insane phrase eg. ``King of Britain``. ::::It is startling however, how having seen the East German files on the matter, you neglected to enter that into the article beforehand. Instead, you only turned your attention to the article after I had worked on it. Can you explain your reasons for suddenly remembering this East German material now? Perhaps to take the heat away from your hack of edits from the edit summary? `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
51,114,616	` ::::I'm sorry, no allegation is being made. Once I challenged you on the ``King of Britain`` phrase, you clearly apologise for editing the article to that state. You also admit that leaving the article in that state was wrong. Thats a fact displayed on up the page. ::::Please stick to the issue at hand- how did you remove your edit fom ``King of England`` to ``King of Britain`` from the edit summary page? Also, can you please explain what other edits you have made to edit summaries on the Seamus O'Donovan article? I notice that you name isnt appearing there in connection with all those erronous submarine details I fixed. ::::Your own hate & baiting campaign has brought you here Damac. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
51,116,900	:::Well exactly the point i've been making, you show NO interest in articles until i've contributed to them. As soon as I do, youre all over them like a rash- rearranging, editing here and there, then spamming me with line after line of pointless drivel- all to no valid contribution. Its just a Harassment & Baiting campaign. Aided and abetted with hacks of the edit summary of articles to remove evidence of your contributions. :::As for your PhD in History and knowledge of the period- where is the evidence of knowledge of the period? If you know so much why hadn't you actually updated or looked at the articles in all the time of your membership? I'm sorry, it doesn't fly Damac. Any serious knowledge of the period would be noted via your contributions, because a number of the articles on the period contain glaring inaccuracies. :::What I have seen is very little knowledge, but a large amount of readiness to harass and distract a serious contributor. Your efforts not culminating in an attempt to have him removed because he knows more on the subject than you do! Please grow up, end your hacking and end your nonsense about qualifications- on here the only qualification worth having is being aware of the facts.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
51,117,464	` :You made a series of edits yes, but you also have the ability of removing evidence of edits you have made. Apologising for edits that were removed by you from the edit summary for Sean Russell article proves this. If no edit was made, no apology would have been forthcoming- as if you would apologise for and state that something that never took place was wrong. :Please stick to the issue at hand- how did you remove your edit fom ``King of England`` to ``King of Britain`` from the edit summary page? And how did you do the same for the Seamus O'Donovan article?`	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
51,117,538	Dear Dmcdevit, I don't admit any guilt in EDITING today. You see, all Wikipedians engage in edit wars, some of them get punished for that. If you decide to punish me, let it be so. If you decide to punish only me, ... we'll discuss it later if needed (for now, see the discussion below ). :As for this, so this is really serious. My new last-resort method against Wikipropagandists. Can you imagine what a mess would occur in Russia-related pages if I fulfill my threat, and recruit other Rus.-literate Wikipedians to it (without POV-pushing or trolling, mere supply of article names and external links)? In order to prevent that and keep each side on it's country pages ), you admins and bureucrats should carefully and ACTIVELY treat the issue of pro-Russian propaganda. Thanks for your intervention and sorry. ===Discussing Wikicrimes and punishments=== :	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
51,125,129	` ==Section Needed for roots of differences== An important point not brought up in this article is that since the US is a nation of imigrants, Americans are not ethnically or racially different than their counterparts in the rest of the world. In other words, the differences are created by the temperment and personality differences of ``those who left`` verse ``those who were left behind``. This could help explain stereotypical American traits such as aggression or material indulgence. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
51,127,697	` ``He had from the beginning laid stress upon the difficulty of associating sanctity with riches; and in this he adopted the quasi-socialistic views of the later Psalms, Ps. ix., x., xxii., xxv., xxxv., xl., lxix., cix. (comp. I. Loeb, ``La Littérature des Pauvres dans la Bible,`` Paris, 1894). He insisted to the fullest extent on the view implied in those Psalms and in various utterances of the Prophets, that poverty and piety, riches and antisocial greed, were practically synonymous (comp. the form of the beatitudes given in Luke vi. 20, 24-26).```	2,006	false	article	random	dev	false
51,127,994	Also, Zeta and Epsilon quickly weakened because of wind shear.	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
51,128,854	` Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. ()() `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
51,138,239	I put to the record that you try desperately to escape from answering my question from here and want to have a fresh start at the issue instead, where your initial opinions differ considerably from those you once had. So please tell me, have I understood your current opinion correctly that the conditional and the unconditional probability both always can be used when calculating the probability that we will win money by taking the other envelope?	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
51,142,857	Perhaps there should be something specifically mentioning that segments of city do exist above ground? While I know this, there are some people who may not fully grasp that concept. Comments anybody?	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
51,157,191	` == Number of protesters == Since the stats on the page say 300k in Chicago and 700k elsewhere, shouldn't the opening sentence say ``a million people were involved in protest`` rather then ``millions`` 300k + 700k = 1M (maybe a little more due to rounding). Millions means like 3M-6M. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
51,158,109	== Audubon, Louisville == Hi, thanks for spotting the typo in the title of this page... I'm kind of embarassed it was there for so long. But the proper way to fix a page title is to move the page (using the move button, next to the history and edit buttons). Simply blanking and copying and pasting as you did is not a good solution for various reasons. You should be able to move pages, but if not there is always Wikipedia:Requested moves. Let me know if you have any questions about this or WP in general. Your edits to Louisville-related articles are noticed and appreciated.	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
51,169,733	`Irpen, it's too early to miss ``me``. I'm still here to watch you. :::`	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
51,171,893	:Hi. I regard your yesterday's note at my talkpage as general understanding of my point. Thank you for that. Can we cooperate in editing despite your dislike of my lexics?	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
51,172,871	` == Re: Your request of evaluation == Hi. Yesterday you requested my evaluation of your behaviour, and here it is: you ARE the shame in Wikipedia but you can't be ``a shame on the Ukrainian community`` since you don't belong to such In case if you need assessment of your activities, just use a special purpose register . `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
51,175,159	::If that's true, then Wiki admins are interested only in pushing their POV and tolerating outright lies about articles, e.g. that AiG ignores gene duplication.	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
51,175,445	E.g. this outright lie has been put back, and people are hiding behind personality issue to avoid addressing the issues.	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
51,175,666	STILL WAITING ON WHERE I PERSONALLY ATTACKED YOU....IF YOU KNEW ANYTHING YOU WOULD KNOW BY READING THE ORIGINAL PAGE I HAD PUT UP, I NEVER PERSONALLY ATTACKED YOU.....	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
51,176,662	== This article is appalling == This article reads like an outline for an undergraduate course. In fact... I bet that's EXACTLY what is is. Furthermore, in regards to the praise on this discussion page - I bet you're an undergraduate who got an A. This is nauseating. I wanna poop and barf at the same time.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
51,176,886	` ::::What do you call it when editors including you insist on a reading that states that AiG ignores gene duplication yet censor out documentation that proves the contrary, then hide behind an arbcom ruling by a cabal of known anti-creationists? And decide by fiat that an article criticising one of their writers ``noted`` that he didn't understand something rather than claimed this? `	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
51,178,111	` PS: According to this the Dolmabahçe Palace is Baroque and Rococo (presumably 19th century style!) the larger pictire on its own site gives a better impression. Neoclassical portico, I see where they get the Rococo idea from all that moulding on the wall, but there are no broken pediments - obviously a second empire influence in there too with a little ``Italianate`` the way the portico is also a double loggia. To be honest, it such a hybrid, I would be tempted to call it Belle Époque as it looks like an hotel in Biaritz. \| `	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
51,181,684	` == The Game-Players of Titan == Just wondered what the edit you made to the above article did. Not objecting of course, just wondered what the edit listed as ``name order`` did to the categories. I see no difference, but I'd appreciate picking up good habits on here `	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
51,183,241	:Ooops... I normally do check. Apologies. I'm new to this... what do I do now? Unblock the user then reblock them for the duration that you blocked them for? Darth	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
51,187,882	`== A welcome from == Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers: If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself. Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments. The Five Pillars of Wikipedia Simplified Ruleset How to edit a page Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial Picture tutorial How to write a great article Naming conventions Manual of Style *Wikipedia Glossary I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful. Happy editing! ( ¦ ✉)'' `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
51,191,653	wonderful site for getting down to L&D; 13, with copyright free images no less	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
51,193,817	dam/pool 14 dam/pool 15 dam/pool 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 26 To the Grand Tower Grand Tower to the Ohio River	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
51,195,446	TO PULL THEIR HEADS FROM THEIR COLLECTIVE ARSES	2,006	false	user	blocked	dev	true
51,200,890	== Hey M(asturbator)O(f)L(ies)O(r)B(rainsick)O(pinions) == I see, such Idiots like you never give up! Fortunately I know that you are not a Pole, but a f... bastard who wants to destroy the reputation of every real Pole who has some intelligence!	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	true
51,201,090	I dare you try to blcok ME the best of them all. I know where you live ha ha ha.	2,006	false	user	blocked	dev	false
51,204,890	==Crime During the 1920s== This article is missing a big element. I think organized crime was an extremely important element during the 1920s.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
51,205,004	(At least in the USA)	2,006	false	article	blocked	dev	false
51,219,963	OK, Alex, are you done with merging of my and Russian versions? I mean I'm satisfied with your suprisingly co-operative start (namely of Bakharev). But are you going to include (discuss) the rest of my principal thesises, or should I be edit-warring for them (? Let me know so I can start either discussing or editing voluntarily.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
51,220,726	== Please delete my talk page == Just a reminder: Please delete my talk page.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
51,222,479	first off, when you delete someones article for personal attacks, clarify. Secondy, there was no personal attacks on anyone in the article, it was done with full consent.	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
51,225,286	**OH NO. MY SOCKS PROXY WILL GET BLOCKED. ( ( ( A note to all Wikipedia administrators: YOU ALL EAT SHIT FOR BREAKFAST.	2,006	false	user	blocked	test	true
51,226,521	::There is some confusion over Poniatowski's status. But no confusion over his gallantry, flamboyance or wothiness as a Marshal. Besides, his inclusion would further help to illustrate the GLA's international composition, especially post 1809.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
51,227,534	Penfield Central School District	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
51,229,612	He and his comrades have been added	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
51,232,004	(first level warning) >	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
51,232,736	== YOU FAT SLIMY PIECE OF SHIT == I HOPE YOU FALL THROUGH THE TOILET YA JOBIE. YOU ARE ONE OF THE MPST UNEDUCATED DICKS I HAVE EVER HEARD OF, BURN IN HELL YOU BUGGER, BURN IN HELL! PS. YOU ARE A SHIT.	2,006	false	user	blocked	dev	true
51,240,307	` :::::::::::It's something to keep in mind. You know, Benjamin Tucker and some others, assumed that in a free market that labor would receive its ``full produce.`` But, that's conjecture on his part. What if that doesn't happen? The labor-value individualists never ask themselves that question. What if they're wrong? What if, in a free market, labor and pay to not coincide? Will they become statists and enforce the labor theory of value? What is really their priority? Equity or liberty? Whatever happens in liberty should be consistent with anarchism. `	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
51,244,070	` Yes, the cited FAQ page is amazingly weak. We've covered this many times before - just look up ``dildo`` in the Talk archives. Why dildo? Because the main argument on that FAQ page is: [b]A dildo is whatever traditionally has been considered a dildo.[/b] IOW it uses a totally illegitimate ``definition.`` A good definition needs to have a genus and a differentia. A circular appeal to past usage doesn't hack it. We even used to have a template for this: {\| width=85% align=center style=``background: #F8EABA; border: 1px solid #aaa; margin-bottom: 3px;`` \| ``A dildo is whatever traditionally has been considered a dildo.`` - Unknown Anarcho-socialist Congratulations! You win the ``Head Up Your Ass`` award for being the zillionth person to read one stupid disinformation FAQ about anarchism and think they know it all. FYI, anarchism means: ``a political theory holding all forms of governmental authority to be unnecessary and undesirable and advocating a society based on voluntary cooperation and free association of individuals and groups`` Merriam-Webster ``The theory or doctrine that all forms of government are oppressive and undesirable and should be abolished`` American Heritage College Dictionary *``doctrine rejecting government: an ideology that rejects the need for a system of government in society and proposes its abolition`` Encarta World English Dictionary Observe that there is nothing zero nada requiring socialism, or favoring any particular economic system. So anarcho-capitalism is anarchism. Get over it. :Note: If you want to argue, please read thoroughly the 24+ pages of Talk:Anarchism/Archives on this topic. Then you may start another edit war. \|}`	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
51,248,778	` This is one of the things you wrote: ``He will not admit when asked, but off the record, his biggest mistake is creating the lethal killing machine Chuck Norris.`` Is that not a personal attack on Chuck Norris? If you can understand English and the structure of this sentence, it if Jeffery Korus' biggest mistake, not an attack on Chuck Norris, more of an admittance of something done wrong by Jeffery Korus. It is close to saying Julius Caesars biggest mistake was being killed. The structure of sentences should be paid more attention to I would think before you delete someones article that does not actually violate anything close to a personal attack.`	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
51,257,331	` Libertatia> ``It strikes me that the an-cap vision being presented here makes the freedom of the market primary, and the freedom of individuals secondary.`` No, you have it backwards. Freedom of individuals is the primary; freedom of the market is simply the application of freedom of individuals with respect to production and trade. Libertatia> ``Anarchism has never been whatever remains in the absence of the state`` Right. Anarchism is the philosophy with the goal absense of State. Of course, anarchists can have other values, too. E.g. We have various additional values which we want in addition to no state. But statelessness is the primary and defining value of anarchism. Libertatia> ``No capitalist I know of espouses capitalism on a moral basis ...`` ??? Rand, Rothbard, Hoppe, hell, just about every anarcho-capitalist I know bases it on the NAP (non-aggression principle) except Friedman and Narveson. Libertatia> ``... on the basis it ``knows`` what is best for everyone.`` Right. We generally abhor utilitarianism, but of course that is not the only moral basis. We tend to prefer Natural Law rather than utilitarian moral justifications. Libertatia> ``Capitalism, like evolution, is nothing more than a blind algorithmic process, which tends to have a certain effect in terms of efficient allocation of resources. It is entirely agnostic, of itself, to ``what's best for the society``, or even whether there is a society...`` Right on. We see society more as an ecosystem with emergent order, as opposed to the statist view of society as a machine to be fixed by some imposed planned order. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
51,257,432	` ``Most liberals`` (and for that matter, most conservatives) have never heard of Kaus. It's too povy to call him a ``hack`` and using the ``some have termed him...`` formula is too weasel wordy. `	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
51,257,772	This IP address is dynamically allocated by an internet service provider, and provides internet connections to an internet cafe via network address translation. The offending user has been banned from computer usage. A removal of the block would be much appreciated.	2,006	false	user	blocked	test	false
51,259,115	` :::Christofurio> ``Anarcho-capitalists seek to say, in essence, that the provision of food, water, electricity, will work out better in a world without the myth of sovereignty.`` :::While most anarcho-capitalists would make that utilitarian claim, the more fundamental contention is that the world would be more moral without ``legitimate`` aggression monopolies (and the myth of sovereignty which makes such monopolies possible.) Even if a world without statist aggression was not as efficient in some ways as statism, we would still favor statelessness.`	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
51,261,317	I am from Canada and I have never witnessed May Day celebrations nor have I ever heard of May Day. We have a labour day in September which to my knowledge has never marked more than the return to school. We like May because it is a good month but no day in May is the May day. I don't think that it is possible to say that these two days are the same because.... they are differant days. Which one am I not supposed to wear white after?	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
51,263,708	:I have removed Pope John Paul II's death from list of tragedies along w/ Christine Dewitts birth. Neith constitute a tragedy. do not re-add them.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
51,272,121	Oh no! I'll have to refresh my IP address, that'll take a whole 2 minutes. Fags.	2,006	false	user	blocked	dev	false
51,274,468	Somewhat problematic. Not the same as your France exmaple - in that here it was 'Canada' (sort of) followed by Upper & Lower Canada, which where not exactly the same thing, followed by Canada. So to say that 'Canada was invaded by the British' is technically correct but misleading. To avoid that quandary & stay out of the inevitable politicization & difficulty of NPOVing we'd run into, I couched the wording in terms which avoided sticking a name onto the political entities in question until post-Confederation. Hence 'local militias defended their homelands from british invasion' - technically they where defending Canada, but seeing that it bore little to no geographical resemblance to today's Canada would leave the average reader not already well versed in Canadian/North American history, well, confused. I thought that 'Prior to Confederation' as the first phrase of the para would have clarified sufficiently...guess not.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
51,281,772	` : Sorry - Diaconis' web page doesn't list such a paper and I let the question of what this alleged paper was stand on talk:Erdős-Bacon number for two weeks before deciding to make my ``correction.`` Looking it up now, it was originally a technical report and it was posthomously part of a book of lectures. Thus it is debatable whether Diaconis ``published with Erdős.`` However, by the definition given on Erdős number, that it merely be a mathematical paper with common authors, in this case a technical report, it qualifies. `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
51,283,993	:Given the length of an episode and the enormous number thereof produced I very much doubt it, and my gut feeling is that in the exceedingly unlikely event of a lawsuit on the part of the Beeb the court would sympathise with a referral thereof by the Foundation to the reply in the case of Arkell v. Pressdram	2,006	false	article	random	train	false
51,288,202	I don't think Wikipedia can speak for every single Roman that lived prior to the fall of the Roman Empire. If by Roman one means someone who wrote in Latin from ~27BCE to ~473CE, then relative to the Greeks the statement is on the right path. But http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/ shows a lot of exceptions. Thanks,	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
51,290,499	` ::::Alright, thank you very much—I appreciate it. I'll inform you of any updates. Muhabbetle. (that's ``yours`` in Turkish) — `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
51,299,077	Yes, I would agree, not exactly a neutral picture on your user page to go on with an article covering such an emotionally charged issue.	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
51,303,980	I wouldn't say is running from a sweeper marked him as a wimp. Rather, it's smarter for him to run than to fight. Even learning martial arts, there would always be a chance the sweeper might be more proficent or just plain get lucky and take him down. Not to mention fighting is going to take up valuable time. Even a few seconds would be time Jarod might not be able to spare as he could not be absolutely certain that in that time more sweepers, or Miss Parker, would be able to close in and catch him. Fighting also carries with it another risk for Jarod. That being getting injured. Even if he were to win the fight and get away before the sweeper could get help, and injury might slow him down enough that he couldn't just disappear or out run pursuit. Thus while there is a chance of someone being able to out run him, running still offers him a better chance to escape capture.	2,006	false	article	random	dev	false
51,308,043	this article - good or bad?=== my opinion is an ambiguous relationship =	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
51,310,235	Please do not remove content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
51,310,598	Hi, I am the user that made the change, I am sorry that I removed the information without quoting a source. In terms of planted varieties, please look at the PDF at http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/1329.02005?OpenDocument . Section 3 of that document shows statistics on planted varieties for the year of 2005. Riesling trails behind Chardonnay, Semillon and Sultana in plantings and Section 4 shows yields where Riesling trails behind the previous mentioned grapes as well as Colombard (I was wrong about Sauvignon Blanc, that information came from Varietal Wines by James Halliday which was republished in 2005). I will leave it to you to decide if the information should be changed again.	2,006	false	article	random	train	false
51,321,210	Oops i have f*&@ed something up while attempting to correct the record crowd for telsta stadium. Original source http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/content_pages/record.asp?recordid=44555 If anyone knows how to fix it would be appreciated!!	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
51,321,440	` {\| style=``background-color:#F9F9F9; border:1px solid #A00; padding:5px;`` \| \| This IP address has been blocked because it is believed to be an open proxy or zombie computer. To prevent abuse, editing from these proxies is currently prohibited. For more information about open proxies and what you can do, please see the WikiProject on open proxies. \|} — `	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
51,339,004	Ok done, i wonder if it was worth all that trouble filling in the list, just to report one of his usernames! cheers	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
51,341,415	I see, well the name of that template was only Iran, not history of iran, so when i searched for it i could not find anything. Well thx for the help and keep up the good work.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
51,346,240	Also i once posted that there is a voting going on at iranian people talk page, to whether include the azeris in the iranian people list or not. Even if you are not interested in those matter it is important that we can get as much votes as we can, so be a sport and vote. Be cool.	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
51,347,689	Grandmaster take a look at your own source at the Shah Ismail page: , you obviously tried to provide a source that says Azeris are turks, but the source does not once mention that Azeris are turks, neither did it have anything to do with Shah ismail. Now if you want to be taken serious here i suggest you cite your own serious source first.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
51,354,245	I am sorry grandmaster i didn't even bother to read what you had to say this time: if you want to know how to be taken seriously take a look what shervin said above, cite sources that are actually correct, and most of all learn how to speak to others.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
51,359,834	Sizes== I just wanted to pinpoint the sizes of the empires and how the empires get judged in one way or another and whether we have same understanding of empires between like British and Mongol Empires per se. Just want to get discussion and clarification going in the article so that people can have little better understanding about the sizes of these empires and how they are understood. Thanks. ==	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
51,364,783	== Bastard == You fat bastard! You have done it! Your end will come! Blood from your throat! Death in the air! And the DN group returned! And your blood is a sight of glory! You fat bastard! Sayonarra and go on a diet!	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	true
51,365,527	I will call you a wuss, and you'll go cryin' to mama! Wuss! WAHHHHHHHHHHHHH!	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	true
51,367,602	==Slim Virgin== You are a mindless, stupid asshole, and are hooked on a power kick. You are also, sadly, neither slim nor a virgin.	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	true
51,379,472	` : Well since you haven't copied the information from the block message as the block page suggests and as the unblock template includes in it, I haven't a clue what the source of your block is, without that I can't look into the block and see if an unblock is possible. () `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
51,380,389	== Cranial Analysis edits == 216.234.128.8: Sforza's study was indeed limited in this way. However, Passarino was far more thorough in his research (all major Ethiopian ethnicities, plus Somalians), and it is to his studies that I'm referring. Therefore, the (valid) criticism of the limitations of Sforza's study is, first, completely irrelevant in light of Passarino's findings and second, it just clutters up the already all-too-large article. Also, do NOT delete the counterview point to the criticism of Brace's study. The article deals with a CONTROVERSY, it is not a tool to advance Afrocentric (or Eurocentric) views. Keep that in mind.	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
51,387,050	Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
51,389,932	::Just read what Mr George McFly said here: That there were people called the Azeris prior to the turkic invation. What more needs to be said.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
51,390,652	` == Wow == You are a reverting machine! `	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
51,390,871	::woohoo will the Bahamas join in? or Greenland? brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
51,412,817	Regardless of what sources you have cited not calling him eminent, i really don't see the need to do so. What is wrong with calling him eminent? However you have a point if you want to take out well-known. He is mostly well-known to Iranians and Iranologists perhaps. However moshe here have constantly lied that you came to an agreement calling him distinguished instead, his intentions are a total mystery to me. However i have reported him for vandalism.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false

51,039,811

Yeah, that's what's happened. I actually did revert myself when I saw what you had done, as it didn't show up straight away in my browser, but I see it must have come up with an edit clash when you done the same thing at the same time, and I didn't notice.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

51,043,944

== Teracotta Pie! == Why don't you ask the kids at Tinammen square, was fashion the reason why they were there. Terracotta pie HEY! terracotta pie. HEY! Terracotta pie. HEY! Terracota pie!

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

51,044,456

I rock! I rock! So Drini, who is hotter? Me or Pamela Anderson?

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

51,045,217

I'm sorry about my editing. I'm new to this site so, can you help me?

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

51,061,161

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.4lawschool.com/conlaw/council.shtml. As a copyright violation, Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. ''''

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

51,066,735

Which one has a more distinct taste?

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

51,068,826

According to MedlinePlus, cardiovascular diseases are linked to sleeping disorders. Also, sleeping for less than 6 hours regularily more than doulbles the risk of hypertension. (KEM)

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

51,069,364

= from the wolfstar = Concerning this paragraph under Ideological base:The Party advocates civil liberties, social freedoms, equal rights, equal opportunity, and a free enterprise system tempered by government intervention. The Party believes that government should play a role in alleviating poverty and social injustice, even if that means progressive taxation and a larger role for government. I have pointed out the lack of fact in this statement lots of times. I have changed it on the article page and documented why I changed it. I have asked for comments from others concerning it and have gotten maybe one response to it, long ago. Prove it, please. Or at least show how it is fact. Show how, The Party advocates civil liberties... Just do it.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

51,069,937

'''Hey, dudes. Can someone actually click one of links above and comment on the information?

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

51,084,935

Thanks, Bjsiders for your reply. Okay, here is what I define as civil liberties..the same thing that the Bill of Rights defines as civil liberties. Here are two of those liberties not defended by the Democrats. * freedom of speech ** not defended by Democrats. Democrats tend to jump on people who say offensive things, (offensive how, or to whom) is guess what.. the Democrats! They tend to jump on people who do not use what they consider to be the current politically correct lingo. People have lost their jobs because of this sort of thing. freedom of speech is a right. A God given right enforced in our Constitution. * the right to bear arms. ** Obviously, the right to bear arms torn down by their own admission.Please see article page 'crime and gun control under Democrat Party Stances http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_%28United_States%29 The right to from a militia and the right to bear arms Shall not be infringed This seems pretty clear and simple to me. The right to defend ourselves against tyranny. Another God given and therfore inalienable right. I hope I haven't offended too many Democrats by using the word God in public. Thanks for actually reading this and applying thought to it. Maggie

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

51,087,933

` ::Failing to see the point doesn't validate the change to King of Britain or British King or ``whatever`` backs up Damac in his flame war. ::Accuracy in this matter lies in reporting how the congressmen & media of the time referenced the ``Russell case``. That is what is being laid out in the article- not the pedantic rights and wrongs of the title assumed by monarchs throughout history. Should I reference Eire as the Republic of Ireland despite Hoare's understanding of it as 'Eire'? According to your logic that would also make sense. ::Certainly I can make mistakes, and its fine if Damac chooses to correct inaccurate spelling/punctuation to accurate, but I do stick to what I know. What speaks volumes to me that the articles on IRA/German intelligence & S-plan have laid untouched by Damac since he signed up. He has only shown interest in them after I corrected his work. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

51,088,832

I Fucked Your Mom Last Night. It Felt Awsome. I stuck My dick in her mouth and in her pussy. she let me lick her tits and fuck her all night long. YEEEEEEEEE HAAAAAAAAA is what i was screaming.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

true

51,089,638

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_U.S._immigration_reform_protests Please go to that article. After you do that, come back to this artcle. Both articles are based on the same event, the Boycotts by Immigrants across the country.

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

51,090,628

` :::Fine, change the goal posts to suit. No problem. Considering the support he can whip up for his agenda, i'll do my best to make future contributions ``Damac proof`` before posting. Just don't be suprised if more of his bogus edits of serious contributions cause problems. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

51,092,637

::Since it was not a speedy candidate and should not have been deleted as such, I took the liberty of recreating the list. If you feel it doesn't belong, then list it for normal deletion.

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

51,096,987

:::Threats to block me from editing wikipedia now. Well done Damac- your baiting and harassment campaign paid off! Oh, when you block me? please revert all the articles i've contributed to back to the state they were in before I completed work on them. Be Bold! :::Blocking me would have the bonus of somewhat preventing Damac exercising his flair for harassment and baiting of serious contributors however. Of particular enjoyment to me where his accusations of copyright infringement and plagarism- mentioned on wikipedia:civility? Funny though how Damac's allegations, the campaign of officious & inaccurate 'editing' (really just rearranging my efforts) he unleashed, the spamming of my talk page desipte requests not to, and the constant snipes aimed at baiting & harassment seem to be perfectly acceptable.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

51,098,624

==He's at it again...=== He's quietly moving all CA route pages. c

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

51,103,513

::Further example of Damac's campaign to bait & harass under another article I created Operation Lobster I. He/she added in redundant information to break up the flow of the article naturally Damac was careful not to be signed in when the change was made.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

51,105,511

` :::RE: Damac's claims not to have used to phrase ``King of Britain`` :::Lie. Check my Talk page where he apologises for using the Phrase ``King of Britain`` and admits it was wrong and I was right to remove it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fluffy999 `

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

51,109,387

` :::My first and most important question, DMC. Whom are you calling ``administrator`` here? Is Irpen an admin? (No trick questions, I was out for half a year) `

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

51,112,096

::Damac you have changed the Edit summary somehow. Your denial of first making the edit, then ever having used the term, and now trying to make out that it was all a typo is laughable. How you are able to edit out your edit from the edit summary I don't know yet but thats something admins can probably speak to- i'm just the victim of this nutter's hate campaign.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

51,113,730

`::::Great, fine, no problem. Change the article. I have no problem should you introduce cited, backed up research. If Hull is wrong, say so, but back it up with credible sourced material proving your case- don't just blunder in, delete and overwrite valid material in context with insane phrase eg. ``King of Britain``. ::::It is startling however, how having seen the East German files on the matter, you neglected to enter that into the article beforehand. Instead, you only turned your attention to the article after I had worked on it. Can you explain your reasons for suddenly remembering this East German material now? Perhaps to take the heat away from your hack of edits from the edit summary? `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

51,114,616

` ::::I'm sorry, no allegation is being made. Once I challenged you on the ``King of Britain`` phrase, you clearly apologise for editing the article to that state. You also admit that leaving the article in that state was wrong. Thats a fact displayed on up the page. ::::Please stick to the issue at hand- how did you remove your edit fom ``King of England`` to ``King of Britain`` from the edit summary page? Also, can you please explain what other edits you have made to edit summaries on the Seamus O'Donovan article? I notice that you name isnt appearing there in connection with all those erronous submarine details I fixed. ::::Your own hate & baiting campaign has brought you here Damac. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

51,116,900

:::Well exactly the point i've been making, you show NO interest in articles until i've contributed to them. As soon as I do, youre all over them like a rash- rearranging, editing here and there, then spamming me with line after line of pointless drivel- all to no valid contribution. Its just a Harassment & Baiting campaign. Aided and abetted with hacks of the edit summary of articles to remove evidence of your contributions. :::As for your PhD in History and knowledge of the period- where is the evidence of knowledge of the period? If you know so much why hadn't you actually updated or looked at the articles in all the time of your membership? I'm sorry, it doesn't fly Damac. Any serious knowledge of the period would be noted via your contributions, because a number of the articles on the period contain glaring inaccuracies. :::What I have seen is very little knowledge, but a large amount of readiness to harass and distract a serious contributor. Your efforts not culminating in an attempt to have him removed because he knows more on the subject than you do! Please grow up, end your hacking and end your nonsense about qualifications- on here the only qualification worth having is being aware of the facts.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

51,117,464

` :You made a series of edits yes, but you also have the ability of removing evidence of edits you have made. Apologising for edits that were removed by you from the edit summary for Sean Russell article proves this. If no edit was made, no apology would have been forthcoming- as if you would apologise for and state that something that never took place was wrong. :Please stick to the issue at hand- how did you remove your edit fom ``King of England`` to ``King of Britain`` from the edit summary page? And how did you do the same for the Seamus O'Donovan article?`

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

51,117,538

Dear Dmcdevit, I don't admit any guilt in EDITING today. You see, all Wikipedians engage in edit wars, some of them get punished for that. If you decide to punish me, let it be so. If you decide to punish only me, ... we'll discuss it later if needed (for now, see the discussion below ). :As for this, so this is really serious. My new last-resort method against Wikipropagandists. Can you imagine what a mess would occur in Russia-related pages if I fulfill my threat, and recruit other Rus.-literate Wikipedians to it (without POV-pushing or trolling, mere supply of article names and external links)? In order to prevent that and keep each side on it's country pages ), you admins and bureucrats should carefully and ACTIVELY treat the issue of pro-Russian propaganda. Thanks for your intervention and sorry. ===Discussing Wikicrimes and punishments=== :

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

51,125,129

` ==Section Needed for roots of differences== An important point not brought up in this article is that since the US is a nation of imigrants, Americans are not ethnically or racially different than their counterparts in the rest of the world. In other words, the differences are created by the temperment and personality differences of ``those who left`` verse ``those who were left behind``. This could help explain stereotypical American traits such as aggression or material indulgence. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

51,127,697

` ``He had from the beginning laid stress upon the difficulty of associating sanctity with riches; and in this he adopted the quasi-socialistic views of the later Psalms, Ps. ix., x., xxii., xxv., xxxv., xl., lxix., cix. (comp. I. Loeb, ``La Littérature des Pauvres dans la Bible,`` Paris, 1894). He insisted to the fullest extent on the view implied in those Psalms and in various utterances of the Prophets, that poverty and piety, riches and antisocial greed, were practically synonymous (comp. the form of the beatitudes given in Luke vi. 20, 24-26).```

2,006

false

article

random

dev

false

51,127,994

Also, Zeta and Epsilon quickly weakened because of wind shear.

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

51,128,854

` Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. ()() `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

51,138,239

I put to the record that you try desperately to escape from answering my question from here and want to have a fresh start at the issue instead, where your initial opinions differ considerably from those you once had. So please tell me, have I understood your current opinion correctly that the conditional and the unconditional probability both always can be used when calculating the probability that we will win money by taking the other envelope?

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

51,142,857

Perhaps there should be something specifically mentioning that segments of city do exist above ground? While I know this, there are some people who may not fully grasp that concept. Comments anybody?

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

51,157,191

` == Number of protesters == Since the stats on the page say 300k in Chicago and 700k elsewhere, shouldn't the opening sentence say ``a million people were involved in protest`` rather then ``millions`` 300k + 700k = 1M (maybe a little more due to rounding). Millions means like 3M-6M. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

51,158,109

== Audubon, Louisville == Hi, thanks for spotting the typo in the title of this page... I'm kind of embarassed it was there for so long. But the proper way to fix a page title is to move the page (using the move button, next to the history and edit buttons). Simply blanking and copying and pasting as you did is not a good solution for various reasons. You should be able to move pages, but if not there is always Wikipedia:Requested moves. Let me know if you have any questions about this or WP in general. Your edits to Louisville-related articles are noticed and appreciated.

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

51,169,733

`Irpen, it's too early to miss ``me``. I'm still here to watch you. :::`

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

51,171,893

:Hi. I regard your yesterday's note at my talkpage as general understanding of my point. Thank you for that. Can we cooperate in editing despite your dislike of my lexics?

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

51,172,871

` == Re: Your request of evaluation == Hi. Yesterday you requested my evaluation of your behaviour, and here it is: *you ARE the shame in Wikipedia *but you can't be ``a shame on the Ukrainian community`` since you don't belong to such In case if you need assessment of your activities, just use a special purpose register . `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

51,175,159

::If that's true, then Wiki admins are interested only in pushing their POV and tolerating outright lies about articles, e.g. that AiG ignores gene duplication.

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

51,175,445

E.g. this outright lie has been put back, and people are hiding behind personality issue to avoid addressing the issues.

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

51,175,666

STILL WAITING ON WHERE I PERSONALLY ATTACKED YOU....IF YOU KNEW ANYTHING YOU WOULD KNOW BY READING THE ORIGINAL PAGE I HAD PUT UP, I NEVER PERSONALLY ATTACKED YOU.....

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

51,176,662

== This article is appalling == This article reads like an outline for an undergraduate course. In fact... I bet that's EXACTLY what is is. Furthermore, in regards to the praise on this discussion page - I bet you're an undergraduate who got an A. This is nauseating. I wanna poop and barf at the same time.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

51,176,886

` ::::What do you call it when editors including you insist on a reading that states that AiG ignores gene duplication yet censor out documentation that proves the contrary, then hide behind an arbcom ruling by a cabal of known anti-creationists? And decide by fiat that an article criticising one of their writers ``noted`` that he didn't understand something rather than claimed this? `

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

51,178,111

` PS: According to this the Dolmabahçe Palace is Baroque and Rococo (presumably 19th century style!) the larger pictire on its own site gives a better impression. Neoclassical portico, I see where they get the Rococo idea from all that moulding on the wall, but there are no broken pediments - obviously a second empire influence in there too with a little ``Italianate`` the way the portico is also a double loggia. To be honest, it such a hybrid, I would be tempted to call it Belle Époque as it looks like an hotel in Biaritz. | `

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

51,181,684

` == The Game-Players of Titan == Just wondered what the edit you made to the above article did. Not objecting of course, just wondered what the edit listed as ``name order`` did to the categories. I see no difference, but I'd appreciate picking up good habits on here `

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

51,183,241

:Ooops... I normally do check. Apologies. I'm new to this... what do I do now? Unblock the user then reblock them for the duration that you blocked them for? Darth

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

51,187,882

`== A welcome from == Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers: *If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself. *Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments. *The Five Pillars of Wikipedia *Simplified Ruleset *How to edit a page *Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial *Picture tutorial *How to write a great article *Naming conventions *Manual of Style *Wikipedia Glossary I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful. Happy editing! ( ¦ ✉)'' `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

51,191,653

wonderful site for getting down to L&D; 13, with copyright free images no less

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

51,193,817

dam/pool 14 dam/pool 15 dam/pool 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 26 To the Grand Tower Grand Tower to the Ohio River

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

51,195,446

TO PULL THEIR HEADS FROM THEIR COLLECTIVE ARSES

2,006

false

user

blocked

dev

true

51,200,890

== Hey M(asturbator)O(f)L(ies)O(r)B(rainsick)O(pinions) == I see, such Idiots like you never give up! Fortunately I know that you are not a Pole, but a f... bastard who wants to destroy the reputation of every real Pole who has some intelligence!

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

true

51,201,090

I dare you try to blcok ME the best of them all. I know where you live ha ha ha.

2,006

false

user

blocked

dev

false

51,204,890

==Crime During the 1920s== This article is missing a big element. I think organized crime was an extremely important element during the 1920s.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

51,205,004

(At least in the USA)

2,006

false

article

blocked

dev

false

51,219,963

OK, Alex, are you done with merging of my and Russian versions? I mean I'm satisfied with your suprisingly co-operative start (namely of Bakharev). But are you going to include (discuss) the rest of my principal thesises, or should I be edit-warring for them (? Let me know so I can start either discussing or editing voluntarily.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

51,220,726

== Please delete my talk page == Just a reminder: Please delete my talk page.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

51,222,479

first off, when you delete someones article for personal attacks, clarify. Secondy, there was no personal attacks on anyone in the article, it was done with full consent.

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

51,225,286

**OH NO. MY SOCKS PROXY WILL GET BLOCKED. ( ( ( A note to all Wikipedia administrators: YOU ALL EAT SHIT FOR BREAKFAST.

2,006

false

user

blocked

test

true

51,226,521

::There is some confusion over Poniatowski's status. But no confusion over his gallantry, flamboyance or wothiness as a Marshal. Besides, his inclusion would further help to illustrate the GLA's international composition, especially post 1809.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

51,227,534

Penfield Central School District

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

51,229,612

He and his comrades have been added

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

51,232,004

(first level warning) >

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

51,232,736

== YOU FAT SLIMY PIECE OF SHIT == I HOPE YOU FALL THROUGH THE TOILET YA JOBIE. YOU ARE ONE OF THE MPST UNEDUCATED DICKS I HAVE EVER HEARD OF, BURN IN HELL YOU BUGGER, BURN IN HELL! PS. YOU ARE A SHIT.

2,006

false

user

blocked

dev

true

51,240,307

` :::::::::::It's something to keep in mind. You know, Benjamin Tucker and some others, assumed that in a free market that labor would receive its ``full produce.`` But, that's conjecture on his part. What if that doesn't happen? The labor-value individualists never ask themselves that question. What if they're wrong? What if, in a free market, labor and pay to not coincide? Will they become statists and enforce the labor theory of value? What is really their priority? Equity or liberty? Whatever happens in liberty should be consistent with anarchism. `

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

51,244,070

` Yes, the cited FAQ page is amazingly weak. We've covered this many times before - just look up ``dildo`` in the Talk archives. Why dildo? Because the main argument on that FAQ page is: [b]A dildo is whatever traditionally has been considered a dildo.[/b] IOW it uses a totally illegitimate ``definition.`` A good definition needs to have a genus and a differentia. A circular appeal to past usage doesn't hack it. We even used to have a template for this: {| width=85% align=center style=``background: #F8EABA; border: 1px solid #aaa; margin-bottom: 3px;`` | ``A dildo is whatever traditionally has been considered a dildo.`` - Unknown Anarcho-socialist Congratulations! You win the ``Head Up Your Ass`` award for being the zillionth person to read one stupid disinformation FAQ about anarchism and think they know it all. FYI, anarchism means: *``a political theory holding all forms of governmental authority to be unnecessary and undesirable and advocating a society based on voluntary cooperation and free association of individuals and groups`` Merriam-Webster *``The theory or doctrine that all forms of government are oppressive and undesirable and should be abolished`` American Heritage College Dictionary *``doctrine rejecting government: an ideology that rejects the need for a system of government in society and proposes its abolition`` Encarta World English Dictionary Observe that there is nothing zero nada requiring socialism, or favoring any particular economic system. So anarcho-capitalism is anarchism. Get over it. :Note: If you want to argue, please read thoroughly the 24+ pages of Talk:Anarchism/Archives on this topic. Then you may start another edit war. |}`

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

51,248,778

` This is one of the things you wrote: ``He will not admit when asked, but off the record, his biggest mistake is creating the lethal killing machine Chuck Norris.`` Is that not a personal attack on Chuck Norris? If you can understand English and the structure of this sentence, it if Jeffery Korus' biggest mistake, not an attack on Chuck Norris, more of an admittance of something done wrong by Jeffery Korus. It is close to saying Julius Caesars biggest mistake was being killed. The structure of sentences should be paid more attention to I would think before you delete someones article that does not actually violate anything close to a personal attack.`

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

51,257,331

` Libertatia> ``It strikes me that the an-cap vision being presented here makes the freedom of the market primary, and the freedom of individuals secondary.`` No, you have it backwards. Freedom of individuals is the primary; freedom of the market is simply the application of freedom of individuals with respect to production and trade. Libertatia> ``Anarchism has never been whatever remains in the absence of the state`` Right. Anarchism is the philosophy with the goal absense of State. Of course, anarchists can have other values, too. E.g. We have various additional values which we want in addition to no state. But statelessness is the primary and defining value of anarchism. Libertatia> ``No capitalist I know of espouses capitalism on a moral basis ...`` ??? Rand, Rothbard, Hoppe, hell, just about every anarcho-capitalist I know bases it on the NAP (non-aggression principle) except Friedman and Narveson. Libertatia> ``... on the basis it ``knows`` what is best for everyone.`` Right. We generally abhor utilitarianism, but of course that is not the only moral basis. We tend to prefer Natural Law rather than utilitarian moral justifications. Libertatia> ``Capitalism, like evolution, is nothing more than a blind algorithmic process, which tends to have a certain effect in terms of efficient allocation of resources. It is entirely agnostic, of itself, to ``what's best for the society``, or even whether there is a society...`` Right on. We see society more as an ecosystem with emergent order, as opposed to the statist view of society as a machine to be fixed by some imposed planned order. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

51,257,432

` ``Most liberals`` (and for that matter, most conservatives) have never heard of Kaus. It's too povy to call him a ``hack`` and using the ``some have termed him...`` formula is too weasel wordy. `

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

51,257,772

This IP address is dynamically allocated by an internet service provider, and provides internet connections to an internet cafe via network address translation. The offending user has been banned from computer usage. A removal of the block would be much appreciated.

2,006

false

user

blocked

test

false

51,259,115

` :::Christofurio> ``Anarcho-capitalists seek to say, in essence, that the provision of food, water, electricity, will work out better in a world without the myth of sovereignty.`` :::While most anarcho-capitalists would make that utilitarian claim, the more fundamental contention is that the world would be more moral without ``legitimate`` aggression monopolies (and the myth of sovereignty which makes such monopolies possible.) Even if a world without statist aggression was not as efficient in some ways as statism, we would still favor statelessness.`

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

51,261,317

I am from Canada and I have never witnessed May Day celebrations nor have I ever heard of May Day. We have a labour day in September which to my knowledge has never marked more than the return to school. We like May because it is a good month but no day in May is the May day. I don't think that it is possible to say that these two days are the same because.... they are differant days. Which one am I not supposed to wear white after?

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

51,263,708

:I have removed Pope John Paul II's death from list of tragedies along w/ Christine Dewitts birth. Neith constitute a tragedy. do not re-add them.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

51,272,121

Oh no! I'll have to refresh my IP address, that'll take a whole 2 minutes. Fags.

2,006

false

user

blocked

dev

false

51,274,468

Somewhat problematic. Not the same as your France exmaple - in that here it was 'Canada' (sort of) followed by Upper & Lower Canada, which where not exactly the same thing, followed by Canada. So to say that 'Canada was invaded by the British' is technically correct but misleading. To avoid that quandary & stay out of the inevitable politicization & difficulty of NPOVing we'd run into, I couched the wording in terms which avoided sticking a name onto the political entities in question until post-Confederation. Hence 'local militias defended their homelands from british invasion' - technically they where defending Canada, but seeing that it bore little to no geographical resemblance to today's Canada would leave the average reader not already well versed in Canadian/North American history, well, confused. I thought that 'Prior to Confederation' as the first phrase of the para would have clarified sufficiently...guess not.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

51,281,772

` : Sorry - Diaconis' web page doesn't list such a paper and I let the question of what this alleged paper was stand on talk:Erdős-Bacon number for two weeks before deciding to make my ``correction.`` Looking it up now, it was originally a technical report and it was posthomously part of a book of lectures. Thus it is debatable whether Diaconis ``published with Erdős.`` However, by the definition given on Erdős number, that it merely be a mathematical paper with common authors, in this case a technical report, it qualifies. `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

51,283,993

:Given the length of an episode and the enormous number thereof produced I very much doubt it, and my gut feeling is that in the exceedingly unlikely event of a lawsuit on the part of the Beeb the court would sympathise with a referral thereof by the Foundation to the reply in the case of Arkell v. Pressdram

2,006

false

article

random

train

false

51,288,202

I don't think Wikipedia can speak for every single Roman that lived prior to the fall of the Roman Empire. If by Roman one means someone who wrote in Latin from ~27BCE to ~473CE, then relative to the Greeks the statement is on the right path. But http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/ shows a lot of exceptions. Thanks,

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

51,290,499

` ::::Alright, thank you very much—I appreciate it. I'll inform you of any updates. Muhabbetle. (that's ``yours`` in Turkish) — `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

51,299,077

Yes, I would agree, not exactly a neutral picture on your user page to go on with an article covering such an emotionally charged issue.

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

51,303,980

I wouldn't say is running from a sweeper marked him as a wimp. Rather, it's smarter for him to run than to fight. Even learning martial arts, there would always be a chance the sweeper might be more proficent or just plain get lucky and take him down. Not to mention fighting is going to take up valuable time. Even a few seconds would be time Jarod might not be able to spare as he could not be absolutely certain that in that time more sweepers, or Miss Parker, would be able to close in and catch him. Fighting also carries with it another risk for Jarod. That being getting injured. Even if he were to win the fight and get away before the sweeper could get help, and injury might slow him down enough that he couldn't just disappear or out run pursuit. Thus while there is a chance of someone being able to out run him, running still offers him a better chance to escape capture.

2,006

false

article

random

dev

false

51,308,043

this article - good or bad?=== my opinion is an ambiguous relationship =

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

51,310,235

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

51,310,598

Hi, I am the user that made the change, I am sorry that I removed the information without quoting a source. In terms of planted varieties, please look at the PDF at http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/1329.02005?OpenDocument . Section 3 of that document shows statistics on planted varieties for the year of 2005. Riesling trails behind Chardonnay, Semillon and Sultana in plantings and Section 4 shows yields where Riesling trails behind the previous mentioned grapes as well as Colombard (I was wrong about Sauvignon Blanc, that information came from Varietal Wines by James Halliday which was republished in 2005). I will leave it to you to decide if the information should be changed again.

2,006

false

article

random

train

false

51,321,210

Oops i have f*&@ed something up while attempting to correct the record crowd for telsta stadium. Original source http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/content_pages/record.asp?recordid=44555 If anyone knows how to fix it would be appreciated!!

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

51,321,440

` {| style=``background-color:#F9F9F9; border:1px solid #A00; padding:5px;`` | | This IP address has been blocked because it is believed to be an open proxy or zombie computer. To prevent abuse, editing from these proxies is currently prohibited. For more information about open proxies and what you can do, please see the WikiProject on open proxies. |} — `

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

51,339,004

Ok done, i wonder if it was worth all that trouble filling in the list, just to report one of his usernames! cheers

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

51,341,415

I see, well the name of that template was only Iran, not history of iran, so when i searched for it i could not find anything. Well thx for the help and keep up the good work.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

51,346,240

Also i once posted that there is a voting going on at iranian people talk page, to whether include the azeris in the iranian people list or not. Even if you are not interested in those matter it is important that we can get as much votes as we can, so be a sport and vote. Be cool.

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

51,347,689

Grandmaster take a look at your own source at the Shah Ismail page: , you obviously tried to provide a source that says Azeris are turks, but the source does not once mention that Azeris are turks, neither did it have anything to do with Shah ismail. Now if you want to be taken serious here i suggest you cite your own serious source first.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

51,354,245

I am sorry grandmaster i didn't even bother to read what you had to say this time: if you want to know how to be taken seriously take a look what shervin said above, cite sources that are actually correct, and most of all learn how to speak to others.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

51,359,834

Sizes== I just wanted to pinpoint the sizes of the empires and how the empires get judged in one way or another and whether we have same understanding of empires between like British and Mongol Empires per se. Just want to get discussion and clarification going in the article so that people can have little better understanding about the sizes of these empires and how they are understood. Thanks. ==

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

51,364,783

== Bastard == You fat bastard! You have done it! Your end will come! Blood from your throat! Death in the air! And the DN group returned! And your blood is a sight of glory! You fat bastard! Sayonarra and go on a diet!

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

true

51,365,527

I will call you a wuss, and you'll go cryin' to mama! Wuss! WAHHHHHHHHHHHHH!

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

true

51,367,602

==Slim Virgin== You are a mindless, stupid asshole, and are hooked on a power kick. You are also, sadly, neither slim nor a virgin.

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

true

51,379,472

` : Well since you haven't copied the information from the block message as the block page suggests and as the unblock template includes in it, I haven't a clue what the source of your block is, without that I can't look into the block and see if an unblock is possible. () `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

51,380,389

== Cranial Analysis edits == 216.234.128.8: Sforza's study was indeed limited in this way. However, Passarino was far more thorough in his research (all major Ethiopian ethnicities, plus Somalians), and it is to his studies that I'm referring. Therefore, the (valid) criticism of the limitations of Sforza's study is, first, completely irrelevant in light of Passarino's findings and second, it just clutters up the already all-too-large article. Also, do NOT delete the counterview point to the criticism of Brace's study. The article deals with a CONTROVERSY, it is not a tool to advance Afrocentric (or Eurocentric) views. Keep that in mind.

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

51,387,050

Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: *The five pillars of Wikipedia *How to edit a page *Help pages *Tutorial *How to write a great article *Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

51,389,932

::Just read what Mr George McFly said here: That there were people called the Azeris prior to the turkic invation. What more needs to be said.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

51,390,652

` == Wow == You are a reverting machine! `

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

51,390,871

::woohoo will the Bahamas join in? or Greenland? brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

51,412,817

Regardless of what sources you have cited not calling him eminent, i really don't see the need to do so. What is wrong with calling him eminent? However you have a point if you want to take out well-known. He is mostly well-known to Iranians and Iranologists perhaps. However moshe here have constantly lied that you came to an agreement calling him distinguished instead, his intentions are a total mystery to me. However i have reported him for vandalism.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false