rev_id
int64 37.7k
700M
| comment
stringlengths 5
10k
| year
int64 2k
2.02k
| logged_in
bool 2
classes | ns
stringclasses 2
values | sample
stringclasses 2
values | split
stringclasses 3
values | attack
bool 2
classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
648,437,456
|
== Swings (rapper) == Hi. I nominated Carlos and it appears someone else added Swings to that AfD discussion. I can't comment on the merits of the article as I never saw it. Perhaps you should ask for undeletion
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
648,445,511
|
:Since you're so curious, from my previous comments it's abundantly clear that I know where they got their name. Learn to read. Again, ask most teenagers and even college kids who Bull of Heaven are, and a fair handful will know of the band, while the great majority (apart from literature and theology majors) will have no idea what else you'd be referring to. I merely proposed a disambiguation page, while your response drips of pseudo-academic fealty and bile. Get real. There is no consensus here.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
648,454,315
|
Real estate in Italy Real estate in Italy Why should be canceled or must have a consent an article that every nation has? the article still needs to be completed, with numerous art historical references, and current data, sales trends, and many other details.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,458,579
|
The location of Suleyman Shah's tomb is a sovereign territory of Turkey according to France-Turkey 1921 Agreement. Syria obeyed and still obeys that agreement, and since 1921 every sovereignty symbols (Flags, Soldiers, etc.) of Turkey appeared on that territory. When Syria-Turkey border is drawn in 1921, the border separated some villages into two. The naming of most of these villages currently are like that: the part of the villages in Turkey's side is named in Turkish. The parts of the villages in Syria's side is named as the Arabic of the Turkish name or the original Turkish name was protected but with Arabic spelling. This is valid for the new place of the tomb as well: Turkish Eşme (Esme) is in Turkey's side, Syrian Ashma is in Syrian side. Turkey transferred sovereignity of 10000 m2=0.01 km2 territory together with the tomb in Qaraqozak inside another place within Syria (i.e., Syrian Ashma; 200 m from Turkey-Syria border). The Turkish flag is raised in Ashma (200 m from the Turkey-Syria border). The corpses of Suleyman Shah is temporaly in Turkey. When the grave and tomb in Ashma is finished, the corpse of Suleyman Shah will be transferred to Ashma. Hence, sovereign territory was exclave of Turkey, now it is juxtapositioned to Turkey. :* The current change of Suleyman Shah's tomb is not the first change of the sovereign territory within Syria. Due to several reasons (new dams affecting the tomb etc.), sovereign territory of Turkey within Syria was changed earlier many times: 1. From original place to the Caber Castle. 2. From Caber Castle to Qaraqozak village. 3. From Qaraqozak village to Ashma. In all of these changes, sovereignity of Turkey was protected. i.e. Only Turkish flag, Turkish soldiers can be located in that 0.01 km2 territory. :* In http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Syrian_Civil_War_detailed_map#Ashma , there must be a symbol of tomb must be put. And, Ashma must be indicated as Turkey's territory.
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,460,099
|
::1) Please explain what specifically is Business Wire and MPD´s direct conflict of interest. ::2) Please explain what specifically makes BW an unreliable source. What is BW´s direct conflict of interest? They are simply a business wire/ business news source just like many other ones. Please be specific. Simply telling me to read WP policies is not specific: be specific please.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
648,460,322
|
`:* Hanibal911 says: ``...The tomb, which is on a site within Syria that Ankara considers sovereign territory,...`` :Ankara Treaty 1921: http://www.hri.org/docs/FT1921/Franco-Turkish_Pact_1921.pdf :Article 9: The tomb of Suleiman Shah, the grandfather of Sultan Osman, founder of the Ottoman dynasty (the tomb known under the name of Turk Mezari), situated at Jaber Kalesi shall remain, with its appurtenances, the property of Turkey, who may appoint guardians for it and may hoist the Turkish flag there. :Hanibal911, since 1921 no Syrians entered the tomb's area without the allowance of Turkey, and cannot enter hereafter as well. You say ``...Ankara considers...``. It is not only ``...Ankara considers...`` but also ``...accepted and respected by Damascus and the others...``. After Syria lost the territory (all the areas and territories around the tomb) to ISIL, ISIL respected the tomb's area as well. Turkish government said any attack on the tomb is a casus belli. `
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,460,954
|
Bloomberg is also a provider of business news and it is also a commercial business. So, Bloomberg is an unreliable source?
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
648,470,626
|
of Wikipedia and its rules must be interpreted oppositely to declaration. So far, go fuck yourself
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
648,471,018
|
:I have improved the answer
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
648,473,638
|
++this is for you== If you deleted that article ( you know which article I'm talking about), them may you die you fukin bitch cocksusker!
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
648,474,580
|
` ::Why the so-called Hubble constant is called a ``constant`` when it is the inverse of the age of the universe and therefore not at all constant has been a conundrum for me for quite some time now. Only today I discovered the explanation buried in the article. I have to reiterate the call for making this clearer. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
648,476,210
|
What is the actual scholarly basis for the new wording? Or just an editorial position that Wikipedia should assign this brand new definition sua sponte?
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
648,476,436
|
==to Gene== Why you deleted article about S. Allahverdov(Allahverdi-Amatuni)? Whoes order was that to delete that article? Your oa someone else?
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,483,962
|
== Don't get Thai mythology into Indian == Observed many of your changes regarding Indian mythology you mix it up with some third world countries myths ,if you want to write more on them then dude go and update them on those page leave Indian myth alone for God's Sake
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,486,301
|
:Yes, I agree with you about the inappropriateness of the size of the block quote. I was waiting for the other editors to fix it. I do believe that what is being stated in the quote improves the article, namely that although bitcoin is not legally banned in terms of Russian law, it is in fact banned by the authorities on a de facto basis. On the other hand it is also true - as implied in the quote - that there may be many millions of USD (it is a big economy) worth of bitcoins present today in Russia on computers owned by Russians since they bought them from and paid for them in Russian Roubles on exchanges accessible to them outside Russia - and that this practice most probably would continue with and equivalent increase in the number and value of bitcoins inside Russia. If the article would have continued to state in two sourced instances only that bitcoin is illegal in Russia, it would have projected the wrong impression that there are no bitcoins in Russia and that bitcoin plays absolutely no role in the Russian economy. I do agree that the section in question deals with the legal status of bitcoin in a country. Embellishing the section with reality improves the article.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
648,487,227
|
bitcoin in a country. Embellishing the section with reality improves
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
648,492,261
|
` ::You are making a big mistake: You removed my reliable source. THis is what you removed - including the reliable source - reliable as per Ladislav Mecir a very accomplised editor: Although bitcoin is not legally banned in terms of Russian law, it is in fact banned by the authorities on a de facto basis. On the other hand it is also true that there may be many millions of USD (it is a big economy) worth of bitcoins present today in Russia on computers owned by Russians since they bought them from and paid for them in Russian Roubles on exchanges accessible to them outside Russia - and that this practice most probably would continue with an equivalent increase in the number and value of bitcoins inside Russia. ::Please revert your false allegations against me including that I am attacking other editors: I have a reliable source: you simply state: ``Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.`` :: I had a source: it is in the Bitcoin article history for all to see. Please apologise and revert your false allegations immediatly. `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,492,593
|
` == Please apologize: you made a clear mistake. == You are making a big mistake on Bitcoin: You removed my reliable source. THis is what you removed - including the reliable source - reliable as per Ladislav Mecir a very accomplised editor: Although bitcoin is not legally banned in terms of Russian law, it is in fact banned by the authorities on a de facto basis. On the other hand it is also true that there may be many millions of USD (it is a big economy) worth of bitcoins present today in Russia on computers owned by Russians since they bought them from and paid for them in Russian Roubles on exchanges accessible to them outside Russia - and that this practice most probably would continue with an equivalent increase in the number and value of bitcoins inside Russia. Please revert your false allegations against me including that I am attacking other editors: I have a reliable source: you simply state: ``Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.`` I had a source: it is in the Bitcoin article history for all to see. Please apologise and revert your false allegations immediatly. `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,495,137
|
== Plse stop your personal attack immediately. == Plse stop your personal attack immediately. I spent a lot of time adding valuable content to the bitcoin article with a reliable reference. Ladislav Mecir, the top expert on bitcoin defended my reference. You jump in from the blue and state I have no reference. Go and check where you actually removed my reference. Then you state I have no reference. This normal WP editing you then call disruptive. You carry one stating I am attacking other editors. Just because you and I had an initial misunderstanding about ISIS? You are in full scale personal attack mode. Please stop it immediately. You did not appear so aggressive the first time we communicated. You must be very upset with me just because I did not immediately understood your position on ISIS. Really, you are making some big mistakes here. Please stop and revert what you stated on my talk page. Thank you. I forgive you.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
648,495,344
|
You made a mistake. To err is human.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,495,657
|
: Nope I mean’t Gamergate, not Wikipedia. Thanks.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,498,928
|
:::Well, it has gone that far, actually I made that slip because I'm writing urgent emails to a group of active admins this morning on misogyny, feminism, and Wikipedia. ::: I've also in passing tried to fend off adding more pictures to Elizabeth Warren’s page in order to make a racial argument. (Admin help will be needed there, and a smart admin would get on top of that situation before it winds up in AN/I, AE I guess anything to do with Warren is arguably about a person involved in a gender-related controversy or dispute and the press.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,503,690
|
:::I suggest it is best to ignore the reference mentioned in this instance. The article states twice that bitcoin is illegal in Russia. It must be true. There are two very reliable sources stating that. It must be true. I accept the consensus that bitcoin is illegal in Russia.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
648,508,094
|
For additional coverage of the Wikipedia Arbcom aftermath, I've been maintaining a press list here: .
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,514,244
|
` ==Removal of the ``Ancient history`` and ``After the fall of Nineveh``== Fut.Perf. already removed the Assyrian continuity, which was tendentious section of Assyrianism and the same applies for the the other two sections. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,515,364
|
and the introduction text
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,529,548
|
sub-Saharan African rather than
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
648,531,041
|
` ::::Actually all of those pages you've listed are either movements or ought to have an infobox as a government. The problem isn't whether it's a country. We give micronations infoboxes. We can give governments-in-exile infoboxes. It never ceases to amze me the length people will go to to make information harder to acquire on Wikipedia. (See Vichy France and List of governments). '''''' `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,532,759
|
== Home Soundtrack == Can you show me the website which shows the tracklisting then?
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,534,845
|
` : So really, your problem is not so much with the Parliamentary boundaries, but it is anti-Scottish and anti-Welsh bias. Wales and Scotland between them have over 15% of the population - about 1 in 7. This is hardly ``tiny``. :We are a United Kingdom - not every power is devolved to Scotland and Wales, and so they are entitled to equal representation. There is some merit in ``English Votes for English Laws`` though I wouldn't support exactly what the Conservatives are proposing, but Scotland and Wales (an NI for that matter) are entitled to send MPs to Westminster, and that's as it should be, until one or more of those countries votes to leave the Union. :How do you work out your ``ten-point advantage``? My guess is it's just a figure plucked from thin air. The facts are: 1. Scotland and Wales collectively are over-represented by about 13 seats compared to England 2. The vast majority of English and Scottish seats are within about 10% of the average 3. The average Labour seat is 5% smaller than the average Conservative seat 4. The majority of Labour seats have a lower turnout than the majority of Conservative seats, so a safe Labour seat contributes fewer votes to the national total of Labour votes than a safe Conservative seat contributes to the national total of Conservative votes. :I hardly see that this gives Labour a 10% advantage. Can you provide some facts to back up your arguments as I have provided to back up mine? Or perhaps give some examples of which seats have been ``rigged`` and how they should be drawn more fairly to help reach this apparent 100-seat Conservative majority that we should now have?`
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
648,539,667
|
` ::::::::::::::::In fact, they've moved into WP:TE, set up a stand, are are now selling hotdogs and peanuts. What we have here is not so much WP:OR and WP:SYNTH, it's the constantly iterated threat to unleash WP:OR and to declare it consensus. This is doubly futile. First, it's clear there is no consensus for any of this quite the opposite. Second, the world is watching now, and if Wikipedia reversed course and declared that GamerGate really is all about the ethics, and death threats are just part of game culture, and all the rest, it would be rightly excoriated and we'd be back here faster than you could say ``snipers on the second floor``. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,550,777
|
` :::As , we just hard another long, long discussion. 4 editors supported a change to ``movement,`` 23 opposed. Nothing in the Time FAQ indicates that GamerGate has notable adherents, a manifesto, or a statement of goals all of which are normally characteristics of movements. Let’s not discuss this further. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,554,478
|
The previous proposal was closed on 16 February. Today is 23 February. We're repeating what was said there. Let's close and hat. We can revisit this in a year.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,576,108
|
Ho hum. Another day, another new editor who thinks everyone who has been working here is a moron and sees no need to read the 1 million words of talk page discussion, or even last week's discussion. Sorry; the lede reflects the sources. If Gamergate is unhappy, get The New Yorker to do a profile of a gamergate supporter or something, until then, nothing to do here.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,594,193
|
` Roy Allen Williams (born August 1, 1950) is a College basketball coach, who is currently the head coach of the men's basketball team at the University of North Carolina. He first started his college coaching career at University of North Carolina as an assistant coach for Dean Smith in 1978. In 1988, Williams became the head coach of the men's basketball team at University of Kansas(link), where he took them to 14 consecutive NCAA tournaments, collecting an 80% win percentage, and winning 9 conference titles over his 15 year span at Kansas. In 2003, Williams left Kansas to go back home to be the head coach at North Carolina replacing Matt Doherty(link). While Williams has been at North Carolina he has won 6 ACC conference titles, 2 ACC Coach of the Year awards in 2006 and 2011.He is second all-time for most wins at Kansas behind Phog Allen and at North Carolina behind mentor Dean Smith. Additionally, he is eighth all-time in the NCAA for winning percentage.http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/m_basketball_RB/2014/Coaching2.pdf Williams has over 700 career wins and is the fastest to reach this milestone to date. Williams has taken his teams to seven Final Fours in his careers at Kansas and North Carolina and is one of only two coaches (along with Rick Pitino) in NCAA history to have led two different programs to at least three Final Fours each. On April 4, 2005, Williams shed his title as ``the most successful coach to never have won an NCAA ring`` as his Tarheels defeated the University of Illinois in the 2005 NCAA championship game.(link) In 2007, Williams was inducted into the Basketball Hall of Fame. He would again lead the Tar Heels to another National Championship victory on April 6, 2009 against the Michigan State Spartans in the 2009 NCAA championship game. `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
648,595,714
|
: Hi there, that was not a test edit. I was meaning to communicate with User Flyer22. Thanks.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,616,469
|
== Arameans in Israel article = Please, could you take a look at the Arameans in Israel article, because there is an edit war with other users. Thanks in advance.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,616,615
|
` ==Capitalization of ``sun``== , what do you mean by your edit comment ``it is, because it is the proper name of the star our planet orbits``? I had added the paragraph: The word ``sun`` is normally not capitalized but takes the definite article: ``the sun``. However, the International Astronomical Union ``formally recommends`` capitalizing the word (as well as ``Moon`` and ``Earth``). Are you saying ``It is normally capitalized``? Well, that's certainly not true. Maybe certain people think it should normally be capitalized, but it's not normally capitalized. It doesn't matter whether we're talking about the star our planet orbits or the light in the sky. Those are the same thing. I object to having the word ``sun`` capitalized in this article, against normal usage. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
648,616,616
|
== Arameans in Israel == Please, could you take a look at the Arameans in Israel article, because there is an edit war with other users. Thanks in advance.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,618,563
|
test and is in accordance with
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
648,622,424
|
== Congratulations! You have chased another editor away from WP. == Congratulations! You have chased another editor busy making constructive edits away from WP.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,642,990
|
== Last club == Can anyone provide a source for him representing NK Limbuš Pekre? Thank you.
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,644,978
|
Do you know difference between similar and identical? Isn't the same genre as I Am Rich app to sell something looking like app for a lot of money?
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,645,603
|
`do you know difference between words ``identical`` and ``similar``? thanks! `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,654,741
|
: Wikipedia is here offered an unambiguous choice between an expert contributor who upholds the right of women to work in computer science and software development if they want to, and a barbarian horde of internet trolls, openly colluding for months to use Wikipedia as part of a public relations campaign to threaten, shame, and punish female software developers. ::“Next time she shows up at a conference we … give her a crippling injury that’s never going to fully heal … a good solid injury to the knees. I’d say a brain damage, but we don’t want to make it so she ends up too retarded to fear us.” Simon Parkin, “Zoe Quinn’s Depression Quest”, The New Yorker, 9 September 2014. http://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/zoe-quinns-depression-quest :A project which punishes editors for defending the good names and reputations of living people from vicious Internet trolls does not deserve to survive.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,658,567
|
:::They're clearly pro-Sarkeensian. You're just camping the page to force your POV. Your talk page stuff isn't even in good faith anymore.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,661,870
|
::Wikipedia is the place to right the wrongs that Wikipedia inflicts when it is wielded to harm blameless people.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,662,812
|
` ::::edit conflict Wikipedia is the place to right the wrongs that Wikipedia inflicts when it is wielded to harm blameless people. Furthermore, as I said in my talk for the University of Southampton, ``When you’re discussing a matter with the armies of Mordor, Wikipedia is a battleground when they tell you it’s a battleground.`` `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,668,326
|
:::::If you're not addressing the concerns described in my statement above, Dreadstar, why are you posting here and not in another section? If you are, then we’re not talking about different subjects. I asked nay begged you only yesterday to enforce policy; you did not and you have not. Further, I'd ask you to address me with appropriate courtesy in the future; you and I are not yet intimate friends.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,668,439
|
, 24 February 2015 (UTC) :::: The current version does say that the Bentner's were massacred. Are you okay with that? 19:21
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
648,671,611
|
` ::@ not really; it says ``Dreamworks-produced, animated feature film in theaters March 27th. Poppy, anthemic, just slightly R&B; tinged, but generally wispier than fans might be used to, the gospel choir-backed “Towards the Sun” is linked below.`` It doesn't call it a pop song; Poppy counts as influences `
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,671,675
|
` == Towards the Sun == ::@ not really; it says ``Dreamworks-produced, animated feature film in theaters March 27th. Poppy, anthemic, just slightly R&B; tinged, but generally wispier than fans might be used to, the gospel choir-backed “Towards the Sun” is linked below.`` It doesn't call it a pop song; Poppy counts as influences `
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
648,673,557
|
::@ I say; fucking bring it on; you've over stepped the 3RR which you was recently blocked from so if I get blocked; I sure as hell will take yo' ass down as well
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
648,673,598
|
@Tomica I say; fucking bring it on; you've over stepped the 3RR which you was recently blocked from so if I get blocked; I sure as hell will take yo' ass down as well
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
648,675,608
|
I would not like to be unblock but would also like to have Tomica blocked as they have started the edit war as well; I don't see how I'm only blocked and they've gotten away Scott free
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,675,676
|
|Another editor should be blocked as well
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
648,677,536
|
:::::::::As I said, Wikipedia is here offered an unambiguous choice between an expert contributor who upholds the right of women to work in computer science and software development if they want to, and a barbarian horde of internet trolls, openly colluding for months to use Wikipedia as part of a public relations campaign to threaten, shame, and punish female software developers. It’s not complicated.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,681,651
|
sorry I have never written anything on Wikipedia before. i don't know how to refer. i am curious: do you know what is difference between identical and similar?
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
648,685,976
|
:: Your speculations are unhelpful. The Cherokee keep great records. If Warren really was Cherokee, it's safe to assume she would have a family member on their roles.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,686,796
|
` : I know you are writing these things in good faith, Yop, but your claim that Warren's skin or hair color calls into question her claim to Native ancestry is offensive. On that logic, the racial identity of everyone who identifies as racially mixed but 'looks white' should be questioned. The difference between Warren and 'white-looking' mixed people such as Mariah Carey and Rashida Jones is that the latter have actual, identifiable parents or grandparents who are racial minorities (African American). On the other hand, all of Warren's ancestors are white. That is why she was and is criticized for this: She said she was a ``minority`` when her whole familyincluding distant ancestorsis lily-white. Finally, it is preposterous to suggest that Warren 'looks minority' in the picture you wish to insert in the article. She looks completely white in all pictures. While some people who look white are multiracial, in her case, she looks white because she is fully white. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,710,764
|
:::::Completely founded but resolved. Thanks for bearing with us. Time is needed for investigation.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
648,711,816
|
:Please refer to Wikipedia's article regarding neutral points of view before making additional edits. Your edit to Panthéon-Assas University violated Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by including an opinionated statement. If you have any questions regarding Wikipedia's policies on these types of issues, then let me know and I would be happy to explain things to you. Thank you, and have a nice day.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
648,720,464
|
` ::: I have no objection to adding the picture. But a better reason needs to be provided than what Yop has offered: namely, to make it seem less ``absurd`` (his word) that she claims to be Native American. That is OR and, for the reasons I mentioned above, offensive. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,720,513
|
her claim to being Native American
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,724,199
|
` ::::::``awkward and unencyclopedic``? It is a quote. You put [sic] after it. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
648,724,645
|
February 2015 I've counted the days NIKKI has been champ and they add up to 102+ so could you please edit it.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
648,737,966
|
` == Question... == *Is there a reason why you keep reverting the recent images I have been adding to articles lately? Erpert `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
648,751,686
|
It only disrupts you, just like your inaccurate title disrupts me.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,752,639
|
` == Truce? == I once again rightfully edited the article however I removed the titles and simply stuck to the years. The fact that for example ``The Launch of NXT`` is about a paragraph of NXT, then jumps from WWE 2010-present clearly does not qualify under ``The Launch of NXT`` whereas the Return of ECW and Money in the Bank paragraphs are soley based on their titles. I beg you to read what I contributed (that you had missed) and see for yourself. I don't know how to add sources but many of my contributions came from watching the product and hearing the on-screen events take place. If you'd like to source them go right ahead, but I will keep adding them back if deleted, as I want others to see missing information.`
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
648,752,919
|
but I will keep adding them back if deleted, as I want others to see missing information.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,767,543
|
*Comment: Please await the results of the RfC before starting to use this material, otherwise we are not respecting the processes of wikipedia. Status Quo before the RfC was that the material was not included, and to base even more material on this, is premature.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
648,776,750
|
`==Proposed Change== An F-coalgebra is not necessarily based on a signature since the functor F is arbitrary. Therefore, the lede is in my opinion incorrect. Any objections? [] `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
648,778,563
|
` ==Hirticlavula== Hello, I am just after a little advice please from a more experienced editor, re: the reverts on the Hirticlavula page by and myself. The two issues I would like your guidance and thoughts on are the citation style. It’s my belief that using a citation template is the preferred style (though I cannot find anything that says so either way). Also, what I think I understand User:J Milburn in implying, is that once a citation style is in place it should not be changed. This is not my interpretation. Indeed, has been tidying my citations, something I am really pleased he does. The second point I would like your thoughts on is the tome of reply. I see this all rather abrupt. And not friendly helpful tone I expect on Wikipedia. Do you read his comments the same way? Do you think I need a just ``man up`` a little? I am not trying to get Jason Quinn in trouble in anyway, He is doing a lot of great work on Wikipedia and long may he continue to do so. I am mostly trying to interpret Wikipedia content guidelines, which I find a minefield, and make myself a better editor in the process. `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
648,780,619
|
:If someone can make a strong enough argument for it too be unprotecerd.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
648,789,359
|
REDIRECT Talk:Bob Hay (footballer, born 1880)
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
648,795,483
|
` : Are you referring to something specifically? `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
648,806,633
|
`:You can put ``watchdog`` or ``investigative journalism`` in the first sentence (with proper sources), but it's known as an advocacy group, even among those who consider the journalism great work. — `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
648,807,554
|
` == You stated: ``Users do not get blocked for content disputes;`` FYI: They do: WP:3RR == You stated on the Bitcoin Talk Page: ``Users do not get blocked for content disputes;`` FYI: They do: WP:3RR The three-revert rule[edit] Shortcut: WP:3RR Editors who engage in edit warring are liable to be BLOCKED from editing to prevent further disruption. While any edit warring may lead to sanctions, there is a bright-line rule called the three-revert rule (3RR), the violation of which often leads to a BLOCK. The three-revert rule states: An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period. An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert. Violations of the rule normally attract BLOCKS of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as an edit-warring violation. See below for exemptions. A ``page`` means any page on Wikipedia, including talk and project space. A ``revert`` means any edit (or administrative action) that reverses the actions of other editors, in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material. A series of consecutive saved revert edits by one user with no intervening edits by another user counts as one revert. The three-revert rule applies per person, not per account; reverts made by multiple accounts operated by one editor count together. Editors violating 3RR will usually be BLOCKED for 24 hours for a first incident. Even without a 3RR violation, an administrator may still act if they believe a user's behavior constitutes edit warring, and any user may report edit warring with or without 3RR being breached. The rule is not an entitlement to revert a page a specific number of times. If an editor violates 3RR by mistake, they should reverse their own most recent reversion. Administrators may take this into account and decide not to BLOCK in such cases—for example if the user is not a habitual edit warrior and is genuinely trying to rectify their own mistake.`` `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,808,423
|
` ::::::: @ You stated: ``Users do not get blocked for content disputes;`` FYI: They do: WP:3RR You stated on the Bitcoin Talk Page: ``Users do not get blocked for content disputes;`` FYI:They do: WP:3RRThe three-revert rule[edit]Shortcut:WP:3RREditors who engage in edit warring are liable to be BLOCKED from editing to prevent further disruption. While any edit warring may lead to sanctions, there is a bright-line rule called the three-revert rule (3RR), the violation of which often leads to a BLOCK.The three-revert rule states:An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period. An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert. Violations of the rule normally attract BLOCKS of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as an edit-warring violation. See below for exemptions.A ``page`` means any page on Wikipedia, including talk and project space. A ``revert`` means any edit (or administrative action) that reverses the actions of other editors, in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material. A series of consecutive saved revert edits by one user with no intervening edits by another user counts as one revert.The three-revert rule applies per person, not per account; reverts made by multiple accounts operated by one editor count together. Editors violating 3RR will usually be BLOCKED for 24 hours for a first incident. Even without a 3RR violation, an administrator may still act if they believe a user's behavior constitutes edit warring, and any user may report edit warring with or without 3RR being breached. The rule is not an entitlement to revert a page a specific number of times. If an editor violates 3RR by mistake, they should reverse their own most recent reversion. Administrators may take this into account and decide not to BLOCK in such cases—for example if the user is not a habitual edit warrior and is genuinely trying to rectify their own mistake.`` `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
648,819,364
|
Fuck off you murdering scum!!!
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
648,821,220
|
Dont give a fuck, russian murdering filth!
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
648,822,072
|
== Needs updating == Records are broken in 2015 Oscars, including best director and best supporting actor. Perhaps more.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
648,825,624
|
== Congratulations: You reverted my WP-editor supported reliably sourced reference and then got me banned for it. == Congratulations! You reverted my WP-editor supported reliably sourced reference and then got me banned for it. Let´s us see if WP will ban me again for highlighting this abuse! You refuse to admit you made a mistake. It is as simple as that. And WP wants to ram it down my throat that I must simply accept that!! Well, I do not!!
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,825,928
|
You are welcome to get me banned me again for stating the truth about you. #IamCharly
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,853,224
|
Just stop your really annoying, dont say your gonna block me.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
648,862,788
|
REDIRECT Talk:A Good Man (song)
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
648,871,310
|
}} : why no notice? That seems pretty unfair and harsh... I put took the links away if you check my most recent update.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,871,685
|
::By the way I did not go to the same pages I did before.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,872,902
|
::: yes the pages say I have edited it, but look how long ago it was edited with no one having a problem with it until now, including YOU since you are avid on Steve Nash's page and did not revert it. It was only when Nikkimaria brought it up, and you rashly block me.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
648,873,020
|
` (done, under ``See also`` - )`
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
648,874,955
|
It will not let me edit on my actual page so I am putting this here:
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,875,233
|
I am pretty much done fucking around with these two-faced administrators who don't listen to shit so just delete me, I am done with bullshit. Adios
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
648,875,550
|
== Terraria == stupid editor you no shit about terraria fucker!!!
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
648,876,261
|
son of a bitch i will revert your edits on terraria
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
648,878,027
|
your edits are wrong so stop this stupidity motherfucker!
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
648,878,365
|
` This is the talk page for discussing improvements to The Wikipedia Adventure Earth article ==Reliable sources about Earth?== *``15 Things I Love about Mother Nature``. Starmother, Jasmine Michelle. Jas Planet Loving Earthblog. May, 2002. http.jasminesearthblog.blogblogblog.com/15_things_I Love. Retrieved . *``Planet Earth in the Balance of History``. Gnawledge, O'penn . Science and Nature Journal. . March 21, 2010. * http.sanj.com/Earthinthebalance. Retrieved . *``Earth is a Planet``. Duzit, E.Z., MiddleSchool Books. April 2004, London. Retrieved . Hope that helps! `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
648,880,396
|
` : No problem. I suspect the ``old`` language tags at the end of the article, afaik they should not be used, now that Wikidata is covering that function. `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
648,893,721
|
` There stated: ``the same in many, but not all, ways.`` Why have you decided that something that is the same in many but not all ways is not similar? Thanks!`
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
648,899,307
|
` == Gallipoli == re: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gallipoli_Campaign&oldid;=prev&diff;=648828337 Did you even bother to look at the result of your revert? (that's what the ``show preview`` button is for). I'm reverting it back. Actually look at your edit does, before blindly making it. - '''' `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
648,913,850
|
` == Gallipoli == Re: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gallipoli_Campaign&oldid;=prev&diff;=648912759 - with this revert, you made the comment: ``Image size should not be specified.`` Really? Why? Is the a wiki-rule on that you can quote? Actually, don't bother... the image needs to be resized. Obviously you're new here, and didn't realize that when you make an edit, even a revert, you are responsible for ensuring that the article has been improved, and more importantly, not made worse. When you make blind reverts, like you did here, because you're in such a rush to show your wiki-superiority, you end up making mistakes - mistakes that others have to both fix (again) and explain to you. I'm going to revert it back. If you get the revert itch again, look at the before and after effects of the edit, and stop wasting people's time. - '''' `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.