dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
649,578,006	to suit her own personal fantasies.While everyone is entitled to their private thoughts, marketing such work to worldwide audience has spawned possibilities of a very wrong interpretation of female desires to immature minds	2,015	false	article	random	test	false
649,610,894	::::::* In that case, see you next tuesday	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
649,632,850	You started a great page on vaccine controversy. There are too many people making it an advertisement for pharmaceutical companies. WP:RSN MIller's article is under fire.	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
649,634,331	Ombudsman, I am a new user. What is the deal with Vaccine Controversies. Not to be paranoid, but it is like Pharma is paying people to own that page. I tried to get Miller's info on IMR vs vaccination. The discussion is now on WP:RSN.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
649,636,869	:The Australian sex abuse case does not belong in the lead because it relates to an individual Chabad community institution and is not a movement wide incident. Echoing , the Chabad movement is 250+ years old, with thousands of community centers across the globe. The Australian case may be added in full to the Australian Chabad page, and it may be mentioned briefly here alongside the movements response. Otherwise we have a serious WP:UNDUE issue here where an individual local incident appears in a general movement wide article.	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
649,641,419	` :::::::Okay added some details/ · · email) `	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
649,642,177	Please go check her instagram!!! Dumb ass how can she live in tampa when she's engaged to souray you retard!!!	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
649,643,386	==New Lead== As an assignment for this course, I expanded and made some changes to the lead section so that it better reflected the contents of the article. :You had copied .	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
649,653,679	` :Anybody with a web blog can post anything, even if it may be false. So help me find sufficient third party proof of what the direct web site, diehardsport.com claims. When I do a Google search for ``SI.com diehardsport.com``, I have trouble finding anything that has SI.com publishing something from diehardsport.com. I likewise have problems doing a Google search of ``foxsports.com diehardsport.com`` :Furthermore, your edit should be written in a neutral point of view, especially with a controversial call like that. In this particular case, the author of the Diehard Sport article should be attributed directly in the text, because he was one giving us that interpretation of the video (which could be disputed by, for example, LA writers and fans). `	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
649,669,531	Just delete my account you faggot!	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	true
649,670,023	page I can say what the hell I want.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
649,670,312	Erased rude comment an uppity editor with Autism left.	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
649,672,081	::::::: I agree with Binksternet. There wouldn't be a problem if this were a two/three-paragraph summary, but this is clearly not the case here. There's also the fact that there's a lot more interpretation in parsing the plot of an album than that of a film. If you want to compare this article with something, compare like-for-like: American Idiot#Story. ::::::: Lastly, neither source the IP offeredthe fan forum and the unpublished papermeet our standards of reliability.—	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
649,675,009	Don't worry nobody will have me to kick around for much longer anyways.	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
649,675,911	don't worry you people won't have me to kick around anymore. Yes that context.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
649,679,949	::Took 140 as a compromise. Otherwise I have to remove a picture, it will not work as it was thought to work. .	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
649,685,639	` sigh, the article is WP:BOMBARDing the reader, saying IT HAS REPEATEDLY BEEN DISMISSED AS A HOAX. What more do you want? In fact, can we get rid of some of the ``bombardment``? The status of this question is quite clear, imo, the scholarly mainstream has consistently been that this is a hoax, but there were occasional legitimate scholarly minority views saying ``hey, what if it's genuine?`` Wikipedia doesn't lose its honour by giving room to these minority views, indeed it should do so under WP:DUE, as long as it is still made clear that they are just that, minority views. `	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
649,716,308	:Escape_Orbit you are fucking moron:))	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
649,747,063	Records of Awesome Editors Who Truly Want To Help== As this is not a study of people's hesitancy, it is not a suitable source for claims about the reasons for people's hesitancy. It would appear to be at best a study making claims about vaccines themselves, not a study about hesitancy or about controversy. If this study is the reason for people's hesitancy, then we should be pointing to a reliable third-party source that states that it's the reason, not to the study itself. If we say people stopped going to the beach because of the film Jaws, we use as a reference the source that makes that statement, not the film itself. So no, it's not a reliable source for what you claim you want to use it for. Nat Gertler (talk) That has got to be the clearest explanation yet. So what you are saying is cite a source that says there is controversy over the vaccine schedule because there is a correlation with infant mortality, then cite both sources? Or should I use opinion pieces like most of the other references in the article? Even the journal of medicine piece is an opinion piece. Is this where wiki gets the facts, from opinions, then excludes peer reviewed journal articles because it is WP:OR? It is built by popular opinion of the editors, from opinion pieces, not allowing facts...if this is indeed true....though I hope notDcrsmama (talk) No, I'm not saying cite both sources. References are there to verify the facts that are being stated in Wikipedia's voice. If the statement being sourced is that there is a controversy due to correlation with infant mortality, then we cite a source that is discussing the controversy - there is no need to cite the study. Even if the source says that there is a controversy because of this particular study, we might mention this study in the text, but the study itself is not reference for the statement. And I am addressing the specific request for input that you made in your initial posting. If you have concerns about the other sources in the article, you may wish to raise them in a specific post about the specific concerns. Nat Gertler (talk) ==	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
649,747,370	Funny, I don't feel blocked.	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
649,751,258	I was speaking the truth u son of a bitch go fucking shove your dumbass cock up your pretty boy rectum	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
649,751,779	==Observations== Was attacked en mass in very impolite manner with people questioning very rudely my education and my viewpoint. Ultimately, I was blocked by Bishonen for stating in response to another accusation, that it would be naive to believe pharmacology companies do not have wiki editors just like politicians and other large companies. Although the block was for repeated personal attacks, that is the best quote he could publish...not very repeating. A two day hiatus will be a nice respite. It is clear now, with the censorship I've faced, why wiki is not considered a reliable source in academia.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
649,763,917	((unblock. First off it's justly my nature to use that fucking language alright and its a damn amendment in the constitution you pc bastard this why we can't do shit in this country anymore and should shove your bullshit degree up your ass cunt ass fuck face go get herpes you shithead bastardized fuck	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	true
649,764,984	` Share on printPrint Share on emailEmail Share on www.amazon.comMP3 NO-CASH LYRICS ``Kill Yer Parents`` Send ``Kill Yer Parents`` Ringtone to your Cell childhood is like a lock without a key its the blooming time for brainwash and explanation of what you see growing up and burning up inside do your chores, go to bed put a bullet through yer head kill yer parents / burn their bodies bury the ashes / find out what you want going mad and maturing all along yer parents are fucking blind and their ideals are all wrong influenced by what your parents always want you're a model of their youth you're a trophy they can flaunt kill yer parents / burn their bodies bury the ashes / find out what you want kill yer parents / the voices in yer head EV-O-LU-TION / freedom lies ahead now you're sick and dying too all alone in a black lifeless room with nothing to do death, it doesn't seem to phase me but people crying over dying never ceases to amaze me kill yer parents / live as life dies a burning world / seen through burning eyes Send ``Kill Yer Parents`` Ringtone to your Cell Thanks to Kelsey for correcting these lyrics NO-CASH LYRICS [ www.plyrics.com ]`	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
649,769,327	fucking bitch suck my Vick prick cracker	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	true
649,774,932	` :::You are correct. The other page is about a specific program by a single country. This is page is about a type of ship. They should remain separate. Ultimately, the other page will become a final version when the program is complete, while this page will continue to grow more info becomes available. (in theory...) - '''' `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
649,784,269	` ==Language-population update project== Hi. The 18th edition of Ethnologue just came out, and if we divide up our language articles among us, it won't take long to update them. I would appreciate it if you could help out, even if it's just a few articles (5,000 articles is a lot for just me), but I won't be insulted if you delete this request. A largely complete list of articles to be updated is at Category:Language articles citing Ethnologue 17. The priority articles are in Category:Language articles with old Ethnologue 17 speaker data. These are the 10% that have population figures at least 25 years old. Probably 90% of the time, Ethnologue has not changed their figures between the 17th and 18th editions, so all we need to do is change ``e17`` to ``e18`` in the reference (ref) field of the language info box. That will change the citation for the artcle to the current edition. Please put the data in the proper fields, or the info box will flag it as needing editorial review. The other relevant fields are ``speakers`` (the number of native speakers in all countries), ``date`` (the date of the reference or census that Ethnologue uses, not the date of Ethnologue!), and sometimes ``speakers2``. Our convention has been to enter e.g. ``1990 census`` when a census is used, as other data can be much older than the publication date. Sometimes a citation elsewhere in the article depends on the e17 entry, in which case you will need to change ``name=e17`` to ``name=e18`` in the reference tag (assuming the 18th edition still supports the cited claim). Remember, we want the total number of native speakers, which is often not the first figure given by Ethnologue. Sometimes the data is too incompatible to add together (e.g. a figure from the 1950s for one country, and a figure from 2006 for another), in which case it should be presented that way. That's one use for the ``speakers2`` field. If you're not sure, just ask, or skip that article. Data should not be displayed with more than two, or at most three, significant figures. Sometimes it should be rounded off to just one significant figure, e.g. when some of the component data used by Ethnologue has been approximated with one figure (200,000, 3 million, etc.) and the other data has greater precision. For example, a figure of 200,000 for one country and 4,230 for another is really just 200,000 in total, as the 4,230 is within the margin of rounding off in the 200,000. If you want to retain the spurious precision of the number in Ethnologue, you might want to use the template. (First parameter in this template is for the data, second is for the number of figures to round it off to.) Dates will often need to be a range of all the country data in the Ethnologue article. When entering the date range, I often ignore dates from countries that have only a few percent of the population, as often 10% or so of the population isn't even separately listed by Ethnologue and so is undated anyway. If Ethnologue does not provide a date for the bulk of the population, just enter ``no date`` in the date field. But if the population figure is undated, and hasn't changed between the 17th & 18th editions of Ethnologue, please leave the ref field set to ``e17``, and maybe add a comment to keep it so that other editors don't change it. In cases like this, the edition of Ethnologue that the data first appeared in may be our only indication of how old it is. We still cite the 14th edition in a couple dozen articles, so our readers can see that the data is getting old. The articles in the categories linked above are over 90% of the job. There are probably also articles that do not currently cite Ethnologue, but which we might want to update with the 18th edition. I'll need to generate another category to capture those, probably after most of the Ethnologue 17 citations are taken care of. Jump in at the WP:LANG talk page if you have any comments or concerns. Thanks for any help you can give! — `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
649,797,742	` ::The ticket seems to be 2015030410002797. I can't process it myself, but it does seem valid. § `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
649,827,151	` *Support, ``Emwazi's father, Jasem, admitted that his wife, Ghaneya, had recognised their son in a video, released last August, in which he appeared to behead US journalist James Foley, claims Kuwait's Al-Qabas newspaper.`` as per TheWeek article here. `	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
649,830,893	Records of Awesome Editors Who Truly Want To Help== 'As this is not a study of people's hesitancy, it is not a suitable source for claims about the reasons for people's hesitancy. It would appear to be at best a study making claims about vaccines themselves, not a study about hesitancy or about controversy. If this study is the reason for people's hesitancy, then we should be pointing to a reliable third-party source that states that it's the reason, not to the study itself. If we say people stopped going to the beach because of the film Jaws, we use as a reference the source that makes that statement, not the film itself. So no, it's not a reliable source for what you claim you want to use it for. Nat Gertler (talk) That has got to be the clearest explanation yet. So what you are saying is cite a source that says there is controversy over the vaccine schedule because there is a correlation with infant mortality, then cite both sources? Or should I use opinion pieces like most of the other references in the article? Even the journal of medicine piece is an opinion piece. Is this where wiki gets the facts, from opinions, then excludes peer reviewed journal articles because it is WP:OR? It is built by popular opinion of the editors, from opinion pieces, not allowing facts...if this is indeed true....though I hope notDcrsmama (talk) No, I'm not saying cite both sources. References are there to verify the facts that are being stated in Wikipedia's voice. If the statement being sourced is that there is a controversy due to correlation with infant mortality, then we cite a source that is discussing the controversy - there is no need to cite the study. Even if the source says that there is a controversy because of this particular study, we might mention this study in the text, but the study itself is not reference for the statement. And I am addressing the specific request for input that you made in your initial posting. If you have concerns about the other sources in the article, you may wish to raise them in a specific post about the specific concerns. Nat Gertler (talk) ' From WP:RPS ==	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
649,831,491	Bishonen is abusing his blocking power. Has blocked under the guise of repeated personal attacks, yet cannot reference anything I have said in accordance with WP:NPA. It further appears I am being blocked for observations of a non personal nature, and making statements contrary to those with much time to patrol the pharma related pages.	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
649,860,986	i hate you dai pritchard	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
649,861,358	(what on earth are you doing dai pritchard)	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
649,863,582	== British Imperial Party article == I have one question why was the page deleted when the policy is to welcome newcomers to the site and not scare them away and besides there is articles that are more irrelevant than this?	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
649,874,504	Annotated Bibliography for the Iron Butterfly http://www.optionseducation.org/strategies_advanced_concepts/strategies/long_iron_butterfly.html This source gives an overview of the Iron Butterfly option strategy. It goes in depth into various factors an investor might want to consider when creating a strategy. These factors include: motivation, variations, max loss, max gain, volatility, time decay, and risk. There is also a picture of the strategy’s payoff graph. http://www.investopedia.com/articles/active-trading/030314/what-iron-butterfly-option-strategy.asp This source also gives an overview of the strategy. It goes more into detail of how the strategy is used and its purpose in a portfolio. There is also an example that it included which it helpful in picturing how the strategy is formed. It also includes advantages as well as disadvantages that it has to offer. Example: ABC Company is trading at $50 in August. Eric wants to use an iron butterfly to profit on this stock. He writes both a September 50 call and put and receives $4.00 of premium for each contract. He also buys a September 60 call and September 40 put for $0.75 each. The net result is an immediate $650 credit after the price paid for the long positions is subtracted from the premium received for the short ones ($800-$150). Premium received for short call and put = $4.00 x 2 x 100 shares = $800 Premium paid for long call and put = $0.75 x 2 x 100 shares = $150 $800 - $150 = $650 initial net premium credit http://www.optionstrading.org/strategies/volatile-market/reverse-iron-butterfly-spread/ This source talks about the reverse iron butterfly strategy. It describes what it is and when an investor should employ the strategy instead of the original iron butterfly. It says how to create the strategy and gives key points about the strategy. The source also gives the strategy’s potential profit and loss scope. https://www.fidelity.com/learning-center/investment-products/options/options-strategy-guide/long-iron-butterfly-spread Similar to the other sources, but goes into more detail in some areas. It adds a market forecast into the mix. It says that a forecast of the market needs to be done in order to execute the strategy effectively. There is also discussion of the strategy included, which says the impact of the strategy and what people use it for. The impacts mentioned are: stock price change, change in volatility, and time. There is some interesting controversy on the nature of the name having long in the beginning because of the net credit that is being taken on. http://www.moneyshow.com/articles.asp?aid=OptionsIdea-30500 This is an article that discusses how a hedge fund may use an option. It is used as a way to hedge against some of the risk in a portfolio. Because of its four positions in both long and short options contracts, there is a market neutral output. Unintentional risk exposure is decreased when using the strategy. The article also talks about an interesting 1-2-3 iron butterfly. This may be an interesting point to talk about with further research. http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/779463-rwiegs/122648-options-income-strategies-may-be-dangerous-to-your-health This article takes on an opposing view to options trading. It makes the argument that when looking at the statistics of stock return risk, there are some basic intuitions that are left out. Specifically if you are selling options, there should be a 68% chance that the stock will stay within one standard deviation and therefore you will make money. This doesn’t seem to be the case because of time decay and the expiration of the option. Therefore the chance that the price will not move i	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
649,881,360	:Thanks for the fix.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
649,887,191	`{\| border=``1`` class=``wikitable`` align=``center`` \|+ Praise from users \|- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:PhantomTech&diff;=649754730&oldid;=649731328 \| \|\| \|\| \| \|} `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
649,891,281	` == Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience: From Alien Abductions to Zone Therapy == Greetings! There was a source called '[ Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience: From Alien Abductions to Zone Therapy] recently added to the article. IMHO, we'd need something better than sources dealing with extraterrestrials. Moreover, if the source is to be taken as an ``encyclopedia``, then we should strongly favor reliable secondary sources instead of some tertiary sources, such as encyclopedias (WP:TERTIARY). Cheers! `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
649,893,082	Thom Calandra has been editing this space past recognition. He is a busted RED HANDED securities mutt.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	true
649,896,722	, in all western legal systems.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
649,896,820	are lying when you said you explicitly had that standard in mind when you convicted me. If you consistently applied RS to SPIs	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
649,896,901	` == Art and music – ``little interest``? == ``He also has little interest in art and music, though he does enjoy reading non-fiction literature.`` Where on pp. 206–7 does it say he has little interest in art and music? Modern art and music, fine – but in art and music generally? How can anything on those pages be construed as suggesting as such? `	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
649,899,482	::: By the way: I know I'm violating WP:NPA. But Mike is attacking the basic integrity of the community by arbitrarily condemning/banning me as a sock and lying about the fact that he did so on a whim, without serious research. I defend my personal attacks by appealing to WP:IAR; in this context, of attacking the dangerous culture of unaccountable and incompetent admin behavior, ad hominem arguments are necessary and justified.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
649,905,945	::::::: Can someone please provide a citation indicating that the WP SPI policy is guilty until proven innocent? It seems like people hereespecially the highly respected 'veteran' usersjust make up policy as they go.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
649,906,493	fuck the police f XRAP ROCK LIT POP COUNTRY R&B; NEWS HISTORY SPORTS SCREEN LAW TECH META GENIUS Open in App Weeaboo Song Pink Guy FacebookTwitter Share Play [Verse 1] Konnichiwa, senpai Please notice me I watch Asian cartoons I'm a weeaboo I live in my mom's house I'm like 32 I collect swords and throwing stars 'Cause I'm a weeaboo Sticks and stones may break my bones But I will always be one step ahead of you Because I read the manga (You're such a fucking pleb, are you even even Japanese bro?) I haven't showered in like 16 weeks All my friends and peers are ashamed of me 'Cause all of a sudden I think I'm Japanese [Chorus] Yes, I'm a weeaboo (x4) A filthy weeaboo (Naruto's so overrated) A dirty weeaboo (You wanna see my katana collection?) A fucking weeaboo (I'm learning Japanese on Rosetta Stone) A disgusting weeaboo (So I'm like basically Japanese now) [Verse 2] I sit at my computer desk And argue with teenagers on the internet About atheism And how Japan is superior to other countries I learned a bit of Japanese So now i'm qualified to be a part of their community So i made my avatar a kawaii waifu [Chorus] Yes, I'm a weeaboo (Uh duh, everybody wears kimonos) Yes, I'm a weeaboo (Ninjas are still real, okay?) Yes, I'm a weeaboo (Uh, k-konnichiwa) Yes, I'm a weeaboo (Domo arigato) A filthy weeaboo (...) A dirty weeaboo A fucking weeaboo YOU MIGHT ALSO ENJOY FAFSA, Free Application for Federal Student Aid by Federal Student Aid GSA Mentor-Protege Program (Subpart 519.70) by U.S. General Services Administration Rappers And Their Gang Affiliations by Rap Genius Where My Baes At? by Miranda Sings About Genius Tech Jobs Sign in Contact us © 2015 Genius Media Group Inc. “Weeaboo Song” by Pink Guy But I will always be one step ahead of you / Because I read the manga Show all annotations (1 more)	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
649,908,458	` 2015 (UTC) :: there is no 100 crore club content to enter it into. 23:08, 4 March`	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
649,922,752	`, 5 March 2015 (UTC) :::::::::Bink, that just proves my point. WP ``practice`` is arbitrary, capricious, and unsupported by policy. My block is a seminal example of this. 01:11`	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
649,927,017	` == Wikipedia's image use policy == Hi Cole and welcome to Wikipedia. You may not be aware of Wikipedia's image use policy and fair use policy. The vast majority of images on the internet are not acceptable to use on Wikipedia. Because one of the goals of the project is to encourage the creation of free content, we do not accept photos of living people under a claim of ``fair use``. Unless you, personally, held your camera in your hand and took the picture, it is probably not appropriate to upload. If you have a friend who took a photo that you want to use or if you want to contact someone on Flickr or some other website and ask for permission, Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission has an article on doing so and Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries explains the type of permission we need. Essentially, we need for the copyright holder (the person who snapped the photo with the camera) to agree to a license that permits anyone to use the photo for any reason, provided that they give proper credit. Sometimes this means that we simply don't have a photo at all of someone or that we have a lesser quality photo, but it is considered important toward Wikipedia's goal of a free content encyclopedia. `	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
649,951,415	:Text is not small, it will take some time to rephrase.	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
649,964,958	== Editnotice == Hello, Yunshui. At The dress (viral phenomenon, the dress originated from Scotland which uses British English. I wanted to create an edit notice to notify all the editors to use it in British English, but only administrators and template editors can amend the edits. Can you please help me create this edit notice in favour? Thanks! \| \| )	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
649,966,074	`, 5 March 2015 (UTC) :Add only information from Relaible sources, cite all the contents. Frequent portrayal of a person significantly in leading and known news sorces, journals or Books adds to prove notability of the subject. As far as possible go for Independent sources. Good Luck. ``Thanx n Regards`` 08:59`	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
649,984,218	::::Is this, , enough for secondary source?	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
650,010,563	` == A barnstar for you! == {\| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` \|rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` \| \|style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` \| The Original Barnstar \|- \|style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` \| ها ها! شوکت گوزو جوش آورده!! \|}`	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
650,019,045	== Anton Fick == Anton Fick was not an official member of Kiss in May 1980. That is a lie, a big lie. And it is an evil lie!	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
650,019,256	== What... == ...are you doing and why?	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
650,019,597	NO! It is a lie, that Anton Fick was an official member of Kiss in May 1980. It is not the truth!	2,015	false	user	blocked	test	false
650,021,526	A question please, Mlpearc: What ist wrong with you?	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
650,021,835	that ist the evidence that something is wrong with you, ain't?	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
650,021,943	Where can I read the vandalism site? Please tell me! Thank you!	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
650,049,729	==Nikki's Assignment 6 input=== == To Do == Create a References section Add information on Contemplative Psychology Add more references Improve citation formatting Improve overall page formatting Hey Stefan, these are the things that I think could greatly improve the page. Since Dr. Council stated that we could use any sources that we found to be relevant, putting it all together shouldn't be too hard. I realize that the bullets are a little vague, but it seems like there's a lot of work to do with improving what's already there. == Format Outline == (I'm sure this part could definitely be improved since we have our work cut out for us, I'm totally open to suggestions on how to format the page!) Brief definition of contemplative psychology Brief biography of Han F. de Wit Uses for contemplative psychology Criticisms of contemplative psychology Reference section (with many more references than used within the article) == New References To Add == I haven't really got much for this section other than what I previously posted as reference. Maybe we'd be able to add more if we could find some specifically on Han F. de Wit? I haven't got any preferences on who does which parts as long as the work is evenly divided. Let me know what you think and we can decide who gets what and then get working!	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
650,122,150	`, 6 March 2015 (UTC) ::::::I was focused on you above statement In my browsers, (and ) is more clearly an operation on a function than is . {{}} 09:17`	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
650,125,345	\|Wow! LOL! You even restore the question sign ( 111 ?) . And you say you know about the cars ?!!! For whole my life I never seen more stupid motherfucker than you . So kiss American soil and say goodbye commie !	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
650,142,814	==RILW180MMEF-BEK== Hiya TheLongTone, yeah that was just an accident, sorry	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
650,160,446	== Please note == my recent comments (with very recent edits) in Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 February 21#Category:Metropolitans of Kiev and all Rus'.	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
650,173,151	::JoJan, send me a private message with your email so I can send you an electronic PDF copy of our journal, The Festivus.	2,015	false	user	random	test	false
650,204,342	: just letting you know I saw your msg, but didn't respond. Anyway, as you can see not is all as it seems. BTW, I was also the IP editing from the American University in Sharjah. Anyway it's good to se that Dimmy has publicly committed to giving up that half million....funny that he's hired a pro-Israeli lawyer to do so...I wonder that will be received by potential organisations to receive funds.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
650,214,421	Your addition at Turley Your continued addition of the race car driver at the above page, has been reverted because that page is only there to guide users to Wikipedia articles. If the race car driver does not have an article on Wikipedia yet he then has no place on that list. the page is not meant to list all people with that name, only ones the meet the notability threshold. If you wish to write about this person please feel free to start at Draft:Jeremy Turley. I will link a COI welcome message for you as well so you can familiarize yourself with that policy.- /	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
650,220,909	Thank you very much for having protect Lynn's book against vandalism. I notice that TheRedPenOfDoom continue to delete what he doesn't like of the page. Could you do something for this ? Thanks !	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
650,225,045	== Fastest star fleeing == http://news.sciencemag.org/space/2015/03/fastest-unbound-star-flee-our-galaxy	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
650,228,031	:purevolume is used as a source throughout this site. Given the volume of views and fans its obvious that is real and regularly updated.	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
650,237,379	::: actually if you check the page you'll see its a verified account by the staff at purevolume.	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
650,250,251	`Strong oppose - and show that the father has consistently been conflicted on whether the victim should actually be named or not. Meanwhile, we have no evidence that the other family members actually support the victim being named; indeed, in the latter link, evidence to the contrary existed. Support name is used by international Anglophone media, including BBC and The Telegraph. Wikipedia takes the POV of credible, international Anglophone media, not what individual editors, from their own original research, consider appropriate. The Wikimedia guidelines on contoversial content lay out a principle that ``restrictions to intellectual openness will not as a rule be made when demanded by institutions ... They will be made, when they are, in response to clear and documentable responses by large numbers of individual users, unmoved by ulterior motives, when deemed legitimate under terms and conditions determined by members of the Wikimedia community`` :The documentary India's Daughter mentions that families of rape victims face a culture of shame, and many feel that it's better for rape victims to be killed than have to face social stigma. In my opinion, the goal of Wikipedia is not to pander to that kind of mindset, even if that upsets people in the short term. :A combination of IAR, BLP and common decency goes against your viewpoint. A Meta ``study`` from five years ago has no relevance on this Wiki. It is common for, in sensitive cases such as this one where the family object to having the victim named, for that name not to be included. This goes for both Wikipedia and most respectable news media as well (although the latter has been caught out by the contradictory statements by the father). Comment - I'm going to wait a few more days before I decide. In the past it has been my belief that the family had decided that they did not object but I preferred to wait for better evidence. As for now, I wouldn't make a decision on anything that was said in the past as it is understandable that the parents may have wavered in their decision, and furthermore it can be hard to trust press reports when it comes to any sensational news reporting - after the more recent death of the two girls who supposedly hung themselves there were a least a half a dozen different versions of the incident flying around in the press. After I watched the documentary (before YouTube deleted it) where I heard/saw the parents clearly say that they wanted her name published I was ready to support WP's use of her name. But reading the #1 link above, I've decided to wait to see if anything more is published re her name before I decide. BTW, just to throw it out there, the use of a victim's name remains problematic for the presssee: `	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
650,250,811	` :::: ``We``, it seems like just you as everyone has no issue with this verification process. You seem to be the only holding issue here as no one else is saying anything. Purevolume is a good enough of a source for all others, why not you?`	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
650,258,803	` ==Off topic== This content is sort of off topic and thus I propose deleting it `` - the term now preferred to hospital-acquired infections or nosocomial infections {from New Latin nosocomium (``hospital``), from Ancient Greek νοσοκομείον (nosokomeíon, ``hospital``), from νόσος (nósos, ``disease, illness``) + κομέω (koméō, ``to take care of``)}.`` · · email) `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
650,290,373	*Oppose Page has nothing about Iran.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
650,294,055	== Semi-protected edit request on 7 March 2015 == Education: UC Berkeley/Stanford University Joint Program CSCE	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
650,300,089	` == Thanks... == ...for taking care of the vandal. BTW, I see you're from Baldwin County. During my time in Pensacola, I visited Foley many, many times to shop and eat at Lambert's. I miss those throwed rolls. Cheers. `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
650,302,255	*perhaps you could sort out the problem with the List of Metropolitans and Patriarchs of Kiev#Notes bungled reference. The current problem was caused by my edit, but there had already been a similar problem. I just cannot get to the bottom of it there.	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
650,304,606	== Semi-protected edit request on 7 March 2015 == Writer is the one making Bogus claims without basis.	2,015	false	article	blocked	dev	false
650,305,378	== The Authenticity of the page is questionable == All of writer's claims are bogus without basis.	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
650,305,519	His/her insanity should be investigated.	2,015	false	article	blocked	dev	false
650,306,366	, inspired President of the United States to change his name to Barack Hussein Obama.	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
650,306,852	*Support' The Floodgates have opened Jyoti Singh has been named by all major media; She remains named on Wikipedia, just not this article.	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
650,327,955	This table has to be in the article. I don't have consideration for leftists who don't even read this book and just want to censor it. I have spoken on the talk, showing that contrary to some affirmations, this book receive large positive reviews from more than 50 university professors. If you censor me, you just play the game of the anti-racist ideology, don't try to explain that it is normal, it is just vendalism.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
650,335,585	, 7 March 2015 (UTC) :::::::::::::Sure ) 19:35	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
650,337,081	::::: I'm not holding your hand to find where it says it. Send them an email and find out yourself.	2,015	false	article	blocked	test	false
650,348,482	== Exclusive - Scribbled note shows Nemtsov on trail of Russian deaths in Ukraine == http://uk.reuters.com/article/2015/03/05/uk-russia-nemtsov-ukraine-idUKKBN0M120620150305	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
650,352,515	== New EU Syria sanctions reveal regime collusion with Isis == http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/324b07f6-c42a-11e4-9019-00144feab7de.html	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
650,362,504	`, and the later episode Russian About is about the team going to Russia to stop another ``Old One`` from rising`	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
650,380,330	`==welcome== Hi Kari, my name is Oliver. I am a graduate student at the Warner School and I work in Alumni Relations. I am also an experienced Wikipedian who has volunteered to help with new users who signed up today with Stephanie Frontz. I hope you had fun today and learned a lot. If you have any questions, you can contact me on my . Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: * How to edit a page and How to develop articles * How to create your first article * Simplified Manual of Style * The five pillars of Wikipedia Be bold (and BOLD) Ignore all rules What ``Ignore all rules`` means No angry mastodons Avoiding common mistakes Writing better articles What Wikipedia is not Neutral point of view * Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on {{safesubst:#if:\|\|my talk page}}, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
650,448,661	== Hi == Hi, I Got your message on my email. No, I am not much active on Wikipedia, although I would like to be. Any specific reason you are asking? Please reply on my talk page. Thanks.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
650,456,777	` *Strong support - I was unaware until this month that the article has misinterpreted so many of the citations. part of problem .. copies from and other sentence says ``it is synthesis of various traditions`` then cites Hiltebeitel, p. 12, and p.16 of Flood in the same line. You cannot find anything like that in those citation, same with Samuel, p. 193, it is included above. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
650,469,518	`::*When you said ``related to synthesis`` you already confirmed the misinterpretation. Yes they don't ever talk about any Hindu synthesis at all. Flood's book has not even mentioned synthesis if it matters to you. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
650,593,525	*Support or better still Midnight with Chris Hardwick per MOS:TM	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
650,610,008	` :: As I stated in my edit summary ``recorded so still exists``. All episodes of this series have been recorded and can be and occasionally are re aired or are otherwise available to view. A recorded TV episode does not cease to exist once it has aired. You edited the article to basically state that all episodes of the series are either no longer in existence, none were ever recorded or that all recordings have been destroyed; which requires a reference. It is valid to state that any TV series is no longer airing first run episodes giving a range of start and stop dates, if that fact is referenced, but not that it has completely ceased to exist. `	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
650,617,066	` :Removed excess ``centrifugal force`` stuff. `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
650,636,561	::: My long standing recommendation for those who complain women aren't statistically editing enough, is for those men to stop editing. This has two benefits, first it is clear they have little of value left to contribute, either for the encyclopedia or for themselves and therefore it will move them on to greener pastures. Secondarily, the less they edit, the smaller that statistical gap will be helping to resolve their moaning.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
650,659,297	was reverted by the person who moved it	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
650,668,597	`==T. COTTON LETTER TO THE AYATOLLAHS OF IRAN== DWP: Including the text of a U.S. penal statute is ``editorialization``? You might say that because, upon reading the text of the statute, and comparing it with what Senator T. Cotton, et al, did, definitely leads to the conclusion that a felony has been committed. Cotton is a shoot-from-the-hip pistol-packer, and he snookered 45 other U.S. Senators into signing a letter to a foreign power, warning our worst enemy not to negotiate with a sitting president. You obviously like Cotton, so you don't want people to read the law which he violated. Que sera sera. Tom Cotton[edit] Information icon Hello, I'm Dwpaul. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Tom Cotton, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dwpaul Talk Information icon Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Tom Cotton. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Dwpaul Talk Please learn to properly add and format citations. I have edited your entry at Tom Cotton to do so and to remove the quote you inserted from the Logan Act, the inclusion of which here is still editorialization. Instead, I linked to the Logan Act, where readers can judge its relevance for themselves. Also, I'm not sure where or how you obtained my full name, but it is unnecessary (and unwelcome) that you included it in your edit summaries. Please read WP:OUTING. My name as a Wikipedia editor is Dwpaul, and if you name me in an edit summary please use only that name. If you use any other name for me in the future, I will bring it up at WP:AN/I. Dwpaul Talk `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
650,677,411	` ::HR of, bad brains, says they were Not named after ramones song http://idealistpropaganda.blogspot.com/2011/07/cool-articleinterview-with-hr-bad.htm l....blogs aren't reliable source here but it does have an opinion of the writer band was named after and then the Singer Himself, The person who was there, contradicts that with His Truth. saying they were Not named after. says the following: ``The band pulled its new name, the Bad Brains, from a Ramones song, although H.R. insists that he didn't know it was a Ramones song. He says he thought ``bad`` was street slang for ``good.`` Were the ramones an influence/pre-cursor to hardcore yes they are. However, they, the Ramones were in turn influenced by hardcore, and started playing it during 1983/1984, recorded it on too tough to die (1984) on songs such as ``warthog`` and on the release animal boy (in 1986) they used more Hardcore punk influence on the song ``animal boy`` which are both pretty straight forward hardcore punk songs.. The link to ``Punk rock`` covers the Ramones contribution and it is also listed in the info box Punk is the first listed origin.. The musical characteristics covers what it should and hardcore hasn't had a full ``Johnny Ramone`` influence, enough for logical inclusion since the mid 1980s. Now the section has become a section of name dropping instead of focusing on the real meat and potatoes. the Style. `	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false

649,578,006

to suit her own personal fantasies.While everyone is entitled to their private thoughts, marketing such work to worldwide audience has spawned possibilities of a very wrong interpretation of female desires to immature minds

2,015

false

article

random

test

false

649,610,894

::::::* In that case, see you next tuesday

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

649,632,850

You started a great page on vaccine controversy. There are too many people making it an advertisement for pharmaceutical companies. WP:RSN MIller's article is under fire.

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

649,634,331

Ombudsman, I am a new user. What is the deal with Vaccine Controversies. Not to be paranoid, but it is like Pharma is paying people to own that page. I tried to get Miller's info on IMR vs vaccination. The discussion is now on WP:RSN.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

649,636,869

:The Australian sex abuse case does not belong in the lead because it relates to an individual Chabad community institution and is not a movement wide incident. Echoing , the Chabad movement is 250+ years old, with thousands of community centers across the globe. The Australian case may be added in full to the Australian Chabad page, and it may be mentioned briefly here alongside the movements response. Otherwise we have a serious WP:UNDUE issue here where an individual local incident appears in a general movement wide article.

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

649,641,419

` :::::::Okay added some details/ · · email) `

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

649,642,177

Please go check her instagram!!! Dumb ass how can she live in tampa when she's engaged to souray you retard!!!

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

649,643,386

==New Lead== As an assignment for this course, I expanded and made some changes to the lead section so that it better reflected the contents of the article. :You had copied .

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

649,653,679

` :Anybody with a web blog can post anything, even if it may be false. So help me find sufficient third party proof of what the direct web site, diehardsport.com claims. When I do a Google search for ``SI.com diehardsport.com``, I have trouble finding anything that has SI.com publishing something from diehardsport.com. I likewise have problems doing a Google search of ``foxsports.com diehardsport.com`` :Furthermore, your edit should be written in a neutral point of view, especially with a controversial call like that. In this particular case, the author of the Diehard Sport article should be attributed directly in the text, because he was one giving us that interpretation of the video (which could be disputed by, for example, LA writers and fans). `

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

649,669,531

Just delete my account you faggot!

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

true

649,670,023

page I can say what the hell I want.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

649,670,312

Erased rude comment an uppity editor with Autism left.

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

649,672,081

::::::: I agree with Binksternet. There wouldn't be a problem if this were a two/three-paragraph summary, but this is clearly not the case here. There's also the fact that there's a lot more interpretation in parsing the plot of an album than that of a film. If you want to compare this article with something, compare like-for-like: American Idiot#Story. ::::::: Lastly, neither source the IP offeredthe fan forum and the unpublished papermeet our standards of reliability.—

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

649,675,009

Don't worry nobody will have me to kick around for much longer anyways.

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

649,675,911

don't worry you people won't have me to kick around anymore. Yes that context.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

649,679,949

::Took 140 as a compromise. Otherwise I have to remove a picture, it will not work as it was thought to work. .

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

649,685,639

` sigh, the article is WP:BOMBARDing the reader, saying IT HAS REPEATEDLY BEEN DISMISSED AS A HOAX. What more do you want? In fact, can we get rid of some of the ``bombardment``? The status of this question is quite clear, imo, the scholarly mainstream has consistently been that this is a hoax, but there were occasional legitimate scholarly minority views saying ``hey, what if it's genuine?`` Wikipedia doesn't lose its honour by giving room to these minority views, indeed it should do so under WP:DUE, as long as it is still made clear that they are just that, minority views. `

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

649,716,308

:Escape_Orbit you are fucking moron:))

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

649,747,063

Records of Awesome Editors Who Truly Want To Help== As this is not a study of people's hesitancy, it is not a suitable source for claims about the reasons for people's hesitancy. It would appear to be at best a study making claims about vaccines themselves, not a study about hesitancy or about controversy. If this study is the reason for people's hesitancy, then we should be pointing to a reliable third-party source that states that it's the reason, not to the study itself. If we say people stopped going to the beach because of the film Jaws, we use as a reference the source that makes that statement, not the film itself. So no, it's not a reliable source for what you claim you want to use it for. Nat Gertler (talk) That has got to be the clearest explanation yet. So what you are saying is cite a source that says there is controversy over the vaccine schedule because there is a correlation with infant mortality, then cite both sources? Or should I use opinion pieces like most of the other references in the article? Even the journal of medicine piece is an opinion piece. Is this where wiki gets the facts, from opinions, then excludes peer reviewed journal articles because it is WP:OR? It is built by popular opinion of the editors, from opinion pieces, not allowing facts...if this is indeed true....though I hope notDcrsmama (talk) No, I'm not saying cite both sources. References are there to verify the facts that are being stated in Wikipedia's voice. If the statement being sourced is that there is a controversy due to correlation with infant mortality, then we cite a source that is discussing the controversy - there is no need to cite the study. Even if the source says that there is a controversy because of this particular study, we might mention this study in the text, but the study itself is not reference for the statement. And I am addressing the specific request for input that you made in your initial posting. If you have concerns about the other sources in the article, you may wish to raise them in a specific post about the specific concerns. Nat Gertler (talk) ==

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

649,747,370

Funny, I don't feel blocked.

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

649,751,258

I was speaking the truth u son of a bitch go fucking shove your dumbass cock up your pretty boy rectum

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

649,751,779

==Observations== Was attacked en mass in very impolite manner with people questioning very rudely my education and my viewpoint. Ultimately, I was blocked by Bishonen for stating in response to another accusation, that it would be naive to believe pharmacology companies do not have wiki editors just like politicians and other large companies. Although the block was for repeated personal attacks, that is the best quote he could publish...not very repeating. A two day hiatus will be a nice respite. It is clear now, with the censorship I've faced, why wiki is not considered a reliable source in academia.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

649,763,917

((unblock. First off it's justly my nature to use that fucking language alright and its a damn amendment in the constitution you pc bastard this why we can't do shit in this country anymore and should shove your bullshit degree up your ass cunt ass fuck face go get herpes you shithead bastardized fuck

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

true

649,764,984

` Share on printPrint Share on emailEmail Share on www.amazon.comMP3 NO-CASH LYRICS ``Kill Yer Parents`` Send ``Kill Yer Parents`` Ringtone to your Cell childhood is like a lock without a key its the blooming time for brainwash and explanation of what you see growing up and burning up inside do your chores, go to bed put a bullet through yer head kill yer parents / burn their bodies bury the ashes / find out what you want going mad and maturing all along yer parents are fucking blind and their ideals are all wrong influenced by what your parents always want you're a model of their youth you're a trophy they can flaunt kill yer parents / burn their bodies bury the ashes / find out what you want kill yer parents / the voices in yer head EV-O-LU-TION / freedom lies ahead now you're sick and dying too all alone in a black lifeless room with nothing to do death, it doesn't seem to phase me but people crying over dying never ceases to amaze me kill yer parents / live as life dies a burning world / seen through burning eyes Send ``Kill Yer Parents`` Ringtone to your Cell Thanks to Kelsey for correcting these lyrics NO-CASH LYRICS [ www.plyrics.com ]`

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

649,769,327

fucking bitch suck my Vick prick cracker

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

true

649,774,932

` :::You are correct. The other page is about a specific program by a single country. This is page is about a type of ship. They should remain separate. Ultimately, the other page will become a final version when the program is complete, while this page will continue to grow more info becomes available. (in theory...) - '''' `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

649,784,269

` ==Language-population update project== Hi. The 18th edition of Ethnologue just came out, and if we divide up our language articles among us, it won't take long to update them. I would appreciate it if you could help out, even if it's just a few articles (5,000 articles is a lot for just me), but I won't be insulted if you delete this request. A largely complete list of articles to be updated is at Category:Language articles citing Ethnologue 17. The priority articles are in Category:Language articles with old Ethnologue 17 speaker data. These are the 10% that have population figures at least 25 years old. Probably 90% of the time, Ethnologue has not changed their figures between the 17th and 18th editions, so all we need to do is change ``e17`` to ``e18`` in the reference (ref) field of the language info box. That will change the citation for the artcle to the current edition. Please put the data in the proper fields, or the info box will flag it as needing editorial review. The other relevant fields are ``speakers`` (the number of native speakers in all countries), ``date`` (the date of the reference or census that Ethnologue uses, not the date of Ethnologue!), and sometimes ``speakers2``. Our convention has been to enter e.g. ``1990 census`` when a census is used, as other data can be much older than the publication date. Sometimes a citation elsewhere in the article depends on the e17 entry, in which case you will need to change ``name=e17`` to ``name=e18`` in the reference tag (assuming the 18th edition still supports the cited claim). Remember, we want the *total* number of native speakers, which is often not the first figure given by Ethnologue. Sometimes the data is too incompatible to add together (e.g. a figure from the 1950s for one country, and a figure from 2006 for another), in which case it should be presented that way. That's one use for the ``speakers2`` field. If you're not sure, just ask, or skip that article. Data should not be displayed with more than two, or at most three, significant figures. Sometimes it should be rounded off to just one significant figure, e.g. when some of the component data used by Ethnologue has been approximated with one figure (200,000, 3 million, etc.) and the other data has greater precision. For example, a figure of 200,000 for one country and 4,230 for another is really just 200,000 in total, as the 4,230 is within the margin of rounding off in the 200,000. If you want to retain the spurious precision of the number in Ethnologue, you might want to use the template. (First parameter in this template is for the data, second is for the number of figures to round it off to.) Dates will often need to be a range of all the country data in the Ethnologue article. When entering the date range, I often ignore dates from countries that have only a few percent of the population, as often 10% or so of the population isn't even separately listed by Ethnologue and so is undated anyway. If Ethnologue does not provide a date for the bulk of the population, just enter ``no date`` in the date field. But if the population figure is undated, and hasn't changed between the 17th & 18th editions of Ethnologue, please leave the ref field set to ``e17``, and maybe add a comment to keep it so that other editors don't change it. In cases like this, the edition of Ethnologue that the data first appeared in may be our only indication of how old it is. We still cite the 14th edition in a couple dozen articles, so our readers can see that the data is getting old. The articles in the categories linked above are over 90% of the job. There are probably also articles that do not currently cite Ethnologue, but which we might want to update with the 18th edition. I'll need to generate another category to capture those, probably after most of the Ethnologue 17 citations are taken care of. Jump in at the WP:LANG talk page if you have any comments or concerns. Thanks for any help you can give! — `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

649,797,742

` ::The ticket seems to be 2015030410002797. I can't process it myself, but it does seem valid. § `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

649,827,151

` *Support, ``Emwazi's father, Jasem, admitted that his wife, Ghaneya, had recognised their son in a video, released last August, in which he appeared to behead US journalist James Foley, claims Kuwait's Al-Qabas newspaper.`` as per TheWeek article here. `

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

649,830,893

Records of Awesome Editors Who Truly Want To Help== 'As this is not a study of people's hesitancy, it is not a suitable source for claims about the reasons for people's hesitancy. It would appear to be at best a study making claims about vaccines themselves, not a study about hesitancy or about controversy. If this study is the reason for people's hesitancy, then we should be pointing to a reliable third-party source that states that it's the reason, not to the study itself. If we say people stopped going to the beach because of the film Jaws, we use as a reference the source that makes that statement, not the film itself. So no, it's not a reliable source for what you claim you want to use it for. Nat Gertler (talk) That has got to be the clearest explanation yet. So what you are saying is cite a source that says there is controversy over the vaccine schedule because there is a correlation with infant mortality, then cite both sources? Or should I use opinion pieces like most of the other references in the article? Even the journal of medicine piece is an opinion piece. Is this where wiki gets the facts, from opinions, then excludes peer reviewed journal articles because it is WP:OR? It is built by popular opinion of the editors, from opinion pieces, not allowing facts...if this is indeed true....though I hope notDcrsmama (talk) No, I'm not saying cite both sources. References are there to verify the facts that are being stated in Wikipedia's voice. If the statement being sourced is that there is a controversy due to correlation with infant mortality, then we cite a source that is discussing the controversy - there is no need to cite the study. Even if the source says that there is a controversy because of this particular study, we might mention this study in the text, but the study itself is not reference for the statement. And I am addressing the specific request for input that you made in your initial posting. If you have concerns about the other sources in the article, you may wish to raise them in a specific post about the specific concerns. Nat Gertler (talk) ' From WP:RPS ==

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

649,831,491

Bishonen is abusing his blocking power. Has blocked under the guise of repeated personal attacks, yet cannot reference anything I have said in accordance with WP:NPA. It further appears I am being blocked for observations of a non personal nature, and making statements contrary to those with much time to patrol the pharma related pages.

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

649,860,986

i hate you dai pritchard

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

649,861,358

(what on earth are you doing dai pritchard)

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

649,863,582

== British Imperial Party article == I have one question why was the page deleted when the policy is to welcome newcomers to the site and not scare them away and besides there is articles that are more irrelevant than this?

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

649,874,504

Annotated Bibliography for the Iron Butterfly http://www.optionseducation.org/strategies_advanced_concepts/strategies/long_iron_butterfly.html This source gives an overview of the Iron Butterfly option strategy. It goes in depth into various factors an investor might want to consider when creating a strategy. These factors include: motivation, variations, max loss, max gain, volatility, time decay, and risk. There is also a picture of the strategy’s payoff graph. http://www.investopedia.com/articles/active-trading/030314/what-iron-butterfly-option-strategy.asp This source also gives an overview of the strategy. It goes more into detail of how the strategy is used and its purpose in a portfolio. There is also an example that it included which it helpful in picturing how the strategy is formed. It also includes advantages as well as disadvantages that it has to offer. Example: ABC Company is trading at $50 in August. Eric wants to use an iron butterfly to profit on this stock. He writes both a September 50 call and put and receives $4.00 of premium for each contract. He also buys a September 60 call and September 40 put for $0.75 each. The net result is an immediate $650 credit after the price paid for the long positions is subtracted from the premium received for the short ones ($800-$150). Premium received for short call and put = $4.00 x 2 x 100 shares = $800 Premium paid for long call and put = $0.75 x 2 x 100 shares = $150 $800 - $150 = $650 initial net premium credit http://www.optionstrading.org/strategies/volatile-market/reverse-iron-butterfly-spread/ This source talks about the reverse iron butterfly strategy. It describes what it is and when an investor should employ the strategy instead of the original iron butterfly. It says how to create the strategy and gives key points about the strategy. The source also gives the strategy’s potential profit and loss scope. https://www.fidelity.com/learning-center/investment-products/options/options-strategy-guide/long-iron-butterfly-spread Similar to the other sources, but goes into more detail in some areas. It adds a market forecast into the mix. It says that a forecast of the market needs to be done in order to execute the strategy effectively. There is also discussion of the strategy included, which says the impact of the strategy and what people use it for. The impacts mentioned are: stock price change, change in volatility, and time. There is some interesting controversy on the nature of the name having long in the beginning because of the net credit that is being taken on. http://www.moneyshow.com/articles.asp?aid=OptionsIdea-30500 This is an article that discusses how a hedge fund may use an option. It is used as a way to hedge against some of the risk in a portfolio. Because of its four positions in both long and short options contracts, there is a market neutral output. Unintentional risk exposure is decreased when using the strategy. The article also talks about an interesting 1-2-3 iron butterfly. This may be an interesting point to talk about with further research. http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/779463-rwiegs/122648-options-income-strategies-may-be-dangerous-to-your-health This article takes on an opposing view to options trading. It makes the argument that when looking at the statistics of stock return risk, there are some basic intuitions that are left out. Specifically if you are selling options, there should be a 68% chance that the stock will stay within one standard deviation and therefore you will make money. This doesn’t seem to be the case because of time decay and the expiration of the option. Therefore the chance that the price will not move i

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

649,881,360

:Thanks for the fix.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

649,887,191

`{| border=``1`` class=``wikitable`` align=``center`` |+ Praise from users |- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:PhantomTech&diff;=649754730&oldid;=649731328 | || || | |} `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

649,891,281

` == Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience: From Alien Abductions to Zone Therapy == Greetings! There was a source called '[ Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience: From Alien Abductions to Zone Therapy] recently added to the article. IMHO, we'd need something better than sources dealing with extraterrestrials. Moreover, if the source is to be taken as an ``encyclopedia``, then we should strongly favor reliable secondary sources instead of some tertiary sources, such as encyclopedias (WP:TERTIARY). Cheers! `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

649,893,082

Thom Calandra has been editing this space past recognition. He is a busted RED HANDED securities mutt.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

true

649,896,722

, in all western legal systems.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

649,896,820

are lying when you said you explicitly had that standard in mind when you convicted me. If you consistently applied RS to SPIs

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

649,896,901

` == Art and music – ``little interest``? == ``He also has little interest in art and music, though he does enjoy reading non-fiction literature.`` Where on pp. 206–7 does it say he has little interest in art and music? Modern art and music, fine – but in art and music generally? How can anything on those pages be construed as suggesting as such? `

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

649,899,482

::: By the way: I know I'm violating WP:NPA. But Mike is attacking the basic integrity of the community by arbitrarily condemning/banning me as a sock and lying about the fact that he did so on a whim, without serious research. I defend my personal attacks by appealing to WP:IAR; in this context, of attacking the dangerous culture of unaccountable and incompetent admin behavior, ad hominem arguments are necessary and justified.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

649,905,945

::::::: Can someone please provide a citation indicating that the WP SPI policy is guilty until proven innocent? It seems like people hereespecially the highly respected 'veteran' usersjust make up policy as they go.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

649,906,493

fuck the police f XRAP ROCK LIT POP COUNTRY R&B; NEWS HISTORY SPORTS SCREEN LAW TECH META GENIUS Open in App Weeaboo Song Pink Guy FacebookTwitter Share Play [Verse 1] Konnichiwa, senpai Please notice me I watch Asian cartoons I'm a weeaboo I live in my mom's house I'm like 32 I collect swords and throwing stars 'Cause I'm a weeaboo Sticks and stones may break my bones But I will always be one step ahead of you Because I read the manga (You're such a fucking pleb, are you even even Japanese bro?) I haven't showered in like 16 weeks All my friends and peers are ashamed of me 'Cause all of a sudden I think I'm Japanese [Chorus] Yes, I'm a weeaboo (x4) A filthy weeaboo (Naruto's so overrated) A dirty weeaboo (You wanna see my katana collection?) A fucking weeaboo (I'm learning Japanese on Rosetta Stone) A disgusting weeaboo (So I'm like basically Japanese now) [Verse 2] I sit at my computer desk And argue with teenagers on the internet About atheism And how Japan is superior to other countries I learned a bit of Japanese So now i'm qualified to be a part of their community So i made my avatar a kawaii waifu [Chorus] Yes, I'm a weeaboo (Uh duh, everybody wears kimonos) Yes, I'm a weeaboo (Ninjas are still real, okay?) Yes, I'm a weeaboo (Uh, k-konnichiwa) Yes, I'm a weeaboo (Domo arigato) A filthy weeaboo (...) A dirty weeaboo A fucking weeaboo YOU MIGHT ALSO ENJOY FAFSA, Free Application for Federal Student Aid by Federal Student Aid GSA Mentor-Protege Program (Subpart 519.70) by U.S. General Services Administration Rappers And Their Gang Affiliations by Rap Genius Where My Baes At? by Miranda Sings About Genius Tech Jobs Sign in Contact us © 2015 Genius Media Group Inc. “Weeaboo Song” by Pink Guy But I will always be one step ahead of you / Because I read the manga Show all annotations (1 more)

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

649,908,458

` 2015 (UTC) :: there is no 100 crore club content to enter it into. 23:08, 4 March`

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

649,922,752

`, 5 March 2015 (UTC) :::::::::Bink, that just proves my point. WP ``practice`` is arbitrary, capricious, and unsupported by policy. My block is a seminal example of this. 01:11`

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

649,927,017

` == Wikipedia's image use policy == Hi Cole and welcome to Wikipedia. You may not be aware of Wikipedia's image use policy and fair use policy. The vast majority of images on the internet are not acceptable to use on Wikipedia. Because one of the goals of the project is to encourage the creation of free content, we do not accept photos of living people under a claim of ``fair use``. Unless you, personally, held your camera in your hand and took the picture, it is probably not appropriate to upload. If you have a friend who took a photo that you want to use or if you want to contact someone on Flickr or some other website and ask for permission, Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission has an article on doing so and Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries explains the type of permission we need. Essentially, we need for the copyright holder (the person who snapped the photo with the camera) to agree to a license that permits anyone to use the photo for any reason, provided that they give proper credit. Sometimes this means that we simply don't have a photo at all of someone or that we have a lesser quality photo, but it is considered important toward Wikipedia's goal of a free content encyclopedia. `

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

649,951,415

:Text is not small, it will take some time to rephrase.

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

649,964,958

== Editnotice == Hello, Yunshui. At The dress (viral phenomenon, the dress originated from Scotland which uses British English. I wanted to create an edit notice to notify all the editors to use it in British English, but only administrators and template editors can amend the edits. Can you please help me create this edit notice in favour? Thanks! | | )

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

649,966,074

`, 5 March 2015 (UTC) :Add only information from Relaible sources, cite all the contents. Frequent portrayal of a person significantly in leading and known news sorces, journals or Books adds to prove notability of the subject. As far as possible go for Independent sources. Good Luck. ``Thanx n Regards`` 08:59`

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

649,984,218

::::Is this, , enough for secondary source?

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

650,010,563

` == A barnstar for you! == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` | The Original Barnstar |- |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | ها ها! شوکت گوزو جوش آورده!! |}`

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

650,019,045

== Anton Fick == Anton Fick was not an official member of Kiss in May 1980. That is a lie, a big lie. And it is an evil lie!

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

650,019,256

== What... == ...are you doing and why?

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

650,019,597

NO! It is a lie, that Anton Fick was an official member of Kiss in May 1980. It is not the truth!

2,015

false

user

blocked

test

false

650,021,526

A question please, Mlpearc: What ist wrong with you?

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

650,021,835

that ist the evidence that something is wrong with you, ain't?

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

650,021,943

Where can I read the vandalism site? Please tell me! Thank you!

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

650,049,729

==Nikki's Assignment 6 input=== == To Do == *Create a References section *Add information on Contemplative Psychology *Add more references *Improve citation formatting *Improve overall page formatting Hey Stefan, these are the things that I think could greatly improve the page. Since Dr. Council stated that we could use any sources that we found to be relevant, putting it all together shouldn't be too hard. I realize that the bullets are a little vague, but it seems like there's a lot of work to do with improving what's already there. == Format Outline == (I'm sure this part could definitely be improved since we have our work cut out for us, I'm totally open to suggestions on how to format the page!) *Brief definition of contemplative psychology *Brief biography of Han F. de Wit *Uses for contemplative psychology *Criticisms of contemplative psychology *Reference section (with many more references than used within the article) == New References To Add == I haven't really got much for this section other than what I previously posted as reference. Maybe we'd be able to add more if we could find some specifically on Han F. de Wit? I haven't got any preferences on who does which parts as long as the work is evenly divided. Let me know what you think and we can decide who gets what and then get working!

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

650,122,150

`, 6 March 2015 (UTC) ::::::I was focused on you above statement In my browsers, (and ) is more clearly an operation on a function than is . {{}} 09:17`

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

650,125,345

|Wow! LOL! You even restore the question sign ( 111 ?) . And you say you know about the cars ?!!! For whole my life I never seen more stupid motherfucker than you . So kiss American soil and say goodbye commie !

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

650,142,814

==RILW180MMEF-BEK== Hiya TheLongTone, yeah that was just an accident, sorry

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

650,160,446

== Please note == my recent comments (with very recent edits) in Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 February 21#Category:Metropolitans of Kiev and all Rus'.

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

650,173,151

::JoJan, send me a private message with your email so I can send you an electronic PDF copy of our journal, The Festivus.

2,015

false

user

random

test

false

650,204,342

: just letting you know I saw your msg, but didn't respond. Anyway, as you can see not is all as it seems. BTW, I was also the IP editing from the American University in Sharjah. Anyway it's good to se that Dimmy has publicly committed to giving up that half million....funny that he's hired a pro-Israeli lawyer to do so...I wonder that will be received by potential organisations to receive funds.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

650,214,421

Your addition at Turley Your continued addition of the race car driver at the above page, has been reverted because that page is only there to guide users to Wikipedia articles. If the race car driver does not have an article on Wikipedia yet he then has no place on that list. the page is not meant to list all people with that name, only ones the meet the notability threshold. If you wish to write about this person please feel free to start at Draft:Jeremy Turley. I will link a COI welcome message for you as well so you can familiarize yourself with that policy.- /

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

650,220,909

Thank you very much for having protect Lynn's book against vandalism. I notice that TheRedPenOfDoom continue to delete what he doesn't like of the page. Could you do something for this ? Thanks !

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

650,225,045

== Fastest star fleeing == http://news.sciencemag.org/space/2015/03/fastest-unbound-star-flee-our-galaxy

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

650,228,031

:purevolume is used as a source throughout this site. Given the volume of views and fans its obvious that is real and regularly updated.

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

650,237,379

::: actually if you check the page you'll see its a verified account by the staff at purevolume.

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

650,250,251

`*Strong oppose - and show that the father has consistently been conflicted on whether the victim should actually be named or not. Meanwhile, we have no evidence that the other family members actually support the victim being named; indeed, in the latter link, evidence to the contrary existed. *Support name is used by international Anglophone media, including BBC and The Telegraph. Wikipedia takes the POV of credible, international Anglophone media, not what individual editors, from their own original research, consider appropriate. The Wikimedia guidelines on contoversial content lay out a principle that ``restrictions to intellectual openness will not as a rule be made when demanded by institutions ... They will be made, when they are, in response to clear and documentable responses by large numbers of individual users, unmoved by ulterior motives, when deemed legitimate under terms and conditions determined by members of the Wikimedia community`` :The documentary India's Daughter mentions that families of rape victims face a culture of shame, and many feel that it's better for rape victims to be killed than have to face social stigma. In my opinion, the goal of Wikipedia is not to pander to that kind of mindset, even if that upsets people in the short term. :*A combination of IAR, BLP and common decency goes against your viewpoint. A Meta ``study`` from five years ago has no relevance on this Wiki. It is common for, in sensitive cases such as this one where the family object to having the victim named, for that name not to be included. This goes for both Wikipedia and most respectable news media as well (although the latter has been caught out by the contradictory statements by the father). *Comment - I'm going to wait a few more days before I decide. In the past it has been my belief that the family had decided that they did not object but I preferred to wait for better evidence. As for now, I wouldn't make a decision on anything that was said in the past as it is understandable that the parents may have wavered in their decision, and furthermore it can be hard to trust press reports when it comes to any sensational news reporting - after the more recent death of the two girls who supposedly hung themselves there were a least a half a dozen different versions of the incident flying around in the press. After I watched the documentary (before YouTube deleted it) where I heard/saw the parents clearly say that they wanted her name published I was ready to support WP's use of her name. But reading the #1 link above, I've decided to wait to see if anything more is published re her name before I decide. BTW, just to throw it out there, the use of a victim's name remains problematic for the presssee: `

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

650,250,811

` :::: ``We``, it seems like just you as everyone has no issue with this verification process. You seem to be the only holding issue here as no one else is saying anything. Purevolume is a good enough of a source for all others, why not you?`

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

650,258,803

` ==Off topic== This content is sort of off topic and thus I propose deleting it `` - the term now preferred to hospital-acquired infections or nosocomial infections {from New Latin nosocomium (``hospital``), from Ancient Greek νοσοκομείον (nosokomeíon, ``hospital``), from νόσος (nósos, ``disease, illness``) + κομέω (koméō, ``to take care of``)}.`` · · email) `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

650,290,373

*Oppose Page has nothing about Iran.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

650,294,055

== Semi-protected edit request on 7 March 2015 == Education: UC Berkeley/Stanford University Joint Program CSCE

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

650,300,089

` == Thanks... == ...for taking care of the vandal. BTW, I see you're from Baldwin County. During my time in Pensacola, I visited Foley many, many times to shop and eat at Lambert's. I miss those throwed rolls. Cheers. `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

650,302,255

*perhaps you could sort out the problem with the List of Metropolitans and Patriarchs of Kiev#Notes bungled reference. The current problem was caused by my edit, but there had already been a similar problem. I just cannot get to the bottom of it there.

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

650,304,606

== Semi-protected edit request on 7 March 2015 == Writer is the one making Bogus claims without basis.

2,015

false

article

blocked

dev

false

650,305,378

== The Authenticity of the page is questionable == All of writer's claims are bogus without basis.

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

650,305,519

His/her insanity should be investigated.

2,015

false

article

blocked

dev

false

650,306,366

, inspired President of the United States to change his name to Barack Hussein Obama.

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

650,306,852

*Support' The Floodgates have opened Jyoti Singh has been named by all major media; She remains named on Wikipedia, just not this article.

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

650,327,955

This table has to be in the article. I don't have consideration for leftists who don't even read this book and just want to censor it. I have spoken on the talk, showing that contrary to some affirmations, this book receive large positive reviews from more than 50 university professors. If you censor me, you just play the game of the anti-racist ideology, don't try to explain that it is normal, it is just vendalism.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

650,335,585

, 7 March 2015 (UTC) :::::::::::::Sure ) 19:35

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

650,337,081

::::: I'm not holding your hand to find where it says it. Send them an email and find out yourself.

2,015

false

article

blocked

test

false

650,348,482

== Exclusive - Scribbled note shows Nemtsov on trail of Russian deaths in Ukraine == http://uk.reuters.com/article/2015/03/05/uk-russia-nemtsov-ukraine-idUKKBN0M120620150305

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

650,352,515

== New EU Syria sanctions reveal regime collusion with Isis == http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/324b07f6-c42a-11e4-9019-00144feab7de.html

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

650,362,504

`, and the later episode Russian About is about the team going to Russia to stop another ``Old One`` from rising`

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

650,380,330

`==welcome== Hi Kari, my name is Oliver. I am a graduate student at the Warner School and I work in Alumni Relations. I am also an experienced Wikipedian who has volunteered to help with new users who signed up today with Stephanie Frontz. I hope you had fun today and learned a lot. If you have any questions, you can contact me on my . Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: * How to edit a page and How to develop articles * How to create your first article * Simplified Manual of Style * The five pillars of Wikipedia *Be bold (and BOLD) *Ignore all rules *What ``Ignore all rules`` means *No angry mastodons *Avoiding common mistakes *Writing better articles *What Wikipedia is not *Neutral point of view * Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on {{safesubst:#if:||my talk page}}, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

650,448,661

== Hi == Hi, I Got your message on my email. No, I am not much active on Wikipedia, although I would like to be. Any specific reason you are asking? Please reply on my talk page. Thanks.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

650,456,777

` *Strong support - I was unaware until this month that the article has misinterpreted so many of the citations. part of problem .. copies from and other sentence says ``it is synthesis of various traditions`` then cites Hiltebeitel, p. 12, and p.16 of Flood in the same line. You cannot find anything like that in those citation, same with Samuel, p. 193, it is included above. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

650,469,518

`::*When you said ``related to synthesis`` you already confirmed the misinterpretation. Yes they don't ever talk about any Hindu synthesis at all. Flood's book has not even mentioned synthesis if it matters to you. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

650,593,525

*Support or better still Midnight with Chris Hardwick per MOS:TM

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

650,610,008

` :: As I stated in my edit summary ``recorded so still exists``. All episodes of this series have been recorded and can be and occasionally are re aired or are otherwise available to view. A recorded TV episode does not cease to exist once it has aired. You edited the article to basically state that all episodes of the series are either no longer in existence, none were ever recorded or that all recordings have been destroyed; which requires a reference. It is valid to state that any TV series is no longer airing first run episodes giving a range of start and stop dates, if that fact is referenced, but not that it has completely ceased to exist. `

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

650,617,066

` :Removed excess ``centrifugal force`` stuff. `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

650,636,561

::: My long standing recommendation for those who complain women aren't *statistically* editing enough, is for those men to stop editing. This has two benefits, first it is clear they have little of value left to contribute, either for the encyclopedia or for themselves and therefore it will move them on to greener pastures. Secondarily, the less they edit, the smaller that statistical gap will be helping to resolve their moaning.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

650,659,297

was reverted by the person who moved it

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

650,668,597

`==T. COTTON LETTER TO THE AYATOLLAHS OF IRAN== DWP: Including the text of a U.S. penal statute is ``editorialization``? You might say that because, upon reading the text of the statute, and comparing it with what Senator T. Cotton, et al, did, definitely leads to the conclusion that a felony has been committed. Cotton is a shoot-from-the-hip pistol-packer, and he snookered 45 other U.S. Senators into signing a letter to a foreign power, warning our worst enemy not to negotiate with a sitting president. You obviously like Cotton, so you don't want people to read the law which he violated. Que sera sera. Tom Cotton[edit] Information icon Hello, I'm Dwpaul. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Tom Cotton, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dwpaul Talk Information icon Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Tom Cotton. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Dwpaul Talk Please learn to properly add and format citations. I have edited your entry at Tom Cotton to do so and to remove the quote you inserted from the Logan Act, the inclusion of which here is still editorialization. Instead, I linked to the Logan Act, where readers can judge its relevance for themselves. Also, I'm not sure where or how you obtained my full name, but it is unnecessary (and unwelcome) that you included it in your edit summaries. Please read WP:OUTING. My name as a Wikipedia editor is Dwpaul, and if you name me in an edit summary please use only that name. If you use any other name for me in the future, I will bring it up at WP:AN/I. Dwpaul Talk `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

650,677,411

` ::HR of, bad brains, says they were Not named after ramones song http://idealistpropaganda.blogspot.com/2011/07/cool-articleinterview-with-hr-bad.htm l....blogs aren't reliable source here but it does have an opinion of the writer band was named after and then the Singer Himself, The person who was there, contradicts that with His Truth. saying they were Not named after. says the following: ``The band pulled its new name, the Bad Brains, from a Ramones song, although H.R. insists that he didn't know it was a Ramones song. He says he thought ``bad`` was street slang for ``good.`` Were the ramones an influence/pre-cursor to hardcore yes they are. However, they, the Ramones were in turn influenced by hardcore, and started playing it during 1983/1984, recorded it on too tough to die (1984) on songs such as ``warthog`` and on the release animal boy (in 1986) they used more Hardcore punk influence on the song ``animal boy`` which are both pretty straight forward hardcore punk songs.. The link to ``Punk rock`` covers the Ramones contribution and it is also listed in the info box Punk is the first listed origin.. The musical characteristics covers what it should and hardcore hasn't had a full ``Johnny Ramone`` influence, enough for logical inclusion since the mid 1980s. Now the section has become a section of name dropping instead of focusing on the real meat and potatoes. the Style. `

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false