dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
648,914,638	` == Aftermath section == There is a photo of the memorial at ANZAC Cove, with a dedication written underneath. With the photo in it's original thumb size, the dedication is basically unreadable. I slightly enlarged the photo, to make the dedication easier to read. This is a clear improvement. I'm not sure why, but some busy-bodies keep blindly reverting this edit, obviously without looking at the effects on the text. I'd rather not hit 3RR, so hopefully these people will knock it off. - '''' `	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
648,915,304	` :::That's besides the point. The image needs to be slightly upsized. Just look, instead of blindly reverting.- '''' `	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
648,915,677	` == Gallipoli Campaign == Hello, Regarding your reversions to the Gallipoli Campaign article, the relevant policy specifies that image sizes should generally not be fixed. Please see WP:IMGSIZE. Your rude talk page posts regarding this (alValtos&diff;=648899307&oldid;=643781757 are not at all helpful, or even well informed given that you plainly haven't read the guideline which you abused Charles for not reading. You will be blocked again if this continues. :How many talk pages are going to discuss this on? It's already addressed on the article talk, as well as charlesdrakew. I don't need or want it on mine as well. Again, I will ask that you look at WHY I upsized, throwing policy at me and before blindly reverting. - '''' `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
648,917,662	` ::I made it clear I did not want this discussion on my talkpage, yet you bring right back again? Since when is that ok? And, you specifically added ``also edit warring`` in the block reason? I'd like you to clearly explain exactly how I ``edit warred`` (2 reverts, of 2 different users, 2 days apart?) And how am I ``harassing`` anyone``? This block was unnecessary. Admins that make blocks in error can remove their own blocks, and I'd like you to do that. I shouldn't have to wait for another admin to come along. - '''' `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
648,919,229	` ::Yes, and on that note, I read WP:IMGSIZE, and it specifically states; In general, do not use px without very good reason; upright=scaling factor is preferred wherever sensible. Where px is used, the resulting image should be no more than 500 pixels tall and no more than 400 pixels wide, for comfortable display on the smallest devices in common use. ::I do have a ``very good reason``, the text below the image was unreadable at it's previous size. Additionally, the policy further states that the upsize is not to exceed ``500 pixels``. I only upsized to 250. Therefor, I did not violate IMGSIZE. However, it appears that the 2 editors, and an admin, that while quoting this policy did not read it. The editors blindly reverts my edit, clearly without bothering to look at the impact of the revert, and now an admin has blindly blocked me for... what? An image policy I did not violate? An edit warring policy I did not violate? A harassment policy I did not violate? There is also an accusation of rudeness, that I dispute. I had, if anything, shown my aggravation at what is becoming a growing problem here. The constant pushing of poorly crafted and poorly understood policies, through the practice of blind reverts, often to the detriment of the article and therefore the project. ::If my comments came across as rude, I do apologize, but the reverts were unnecessary, as was this block. - '''' `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
648,921,516	February 25, 2015 6:46 PM You deleted our research about Miss Earth 2015. You deleted all the TBA lists in Upcoming National Pageants. Now, we are now having a hard time for researching for every country you've deleted. Thanks for the damages you've done.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
648,946,436	:::::::By the way, this wasn't me. Nor was [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kenji_Miyazawa&diff;=603518401&oldid;=602008035 the first user to revert you. So that's two more users who oppose you on this issue. ()	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
648,953,695	== InfoBox Portrait == A better info box image might be the subject’s portrait, available here and authorized by the subject.	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
648,980,101	::Thanks for the reply. I disagree that the blood is more significant that the drooling. The drooling sets up every single alien encountersome fool always steps in it, and then BAM. Although it is not covered in the body, it should as it is pretty central to the identity of the Xenomorph. And yes, it should be in the secretions section. But I do think the drooling is one of the central signatures of the creature. and a continuous visual motif.	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
648,988,647	` A severe issue that needs discussing: is this a satirical allusion to Romney’s ``governing as a severe conservative?`` How can an issue be severe? And you aren't just whistling Dixie,. Is it satire, perhaps? ``Stalwart adductions!`` ``Truistic allegations!`` ``Errors are inexorable!`` A ``dubitable article`` is consigned to ``go without rectification.`` (of our bodily humors?) A ``relatively nascent editor``! An article that is ``luridly lengthy and tumescent``! (Hello, Fred Merkle) I think TRPoD was right to hat this. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
648,990,733	` == B-cell lymphoma? == Came across this review: whose abstract includes `` B cell lymphoma was positively associated with phenoxy herbicides and the organophosphorus herbicide glyphosate.`` Should this go in? `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
648,993,834	== Under the Dome == I did explain why the plot should be on the episode page so it is easier to navigate.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
648,994,436	::: TRPoD is correct in regard to canvassing and its attendant woes. Speaking of the state of the article, I believe a talk page is intended for discussing concrete improvements? It's hard to find an actionable suggestion amid the luridly lengthy and tumescently inexorable errors. If the poster believes there is an NPOV concern in the article, the 25+ pages of archives are thataway and discuss this at length, concluding in a consensus that is reflected in the article.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
648,995,356	` :I am not a legal expert, but trying to put too much detail in the legal section will be difficult since only actual court cases in each jurisdiction will decide whether bitcoin is illegal in that jurisdiction or not. For example: it is stated above: ``The claim that bitcoin is ``illegal`` in Indonesia is based on the warning of the Bank Indonesia, which claimed that bitcoin is not a ``legal medium of exchange in Indonesia``. Thus, bitcoin is legal as long as you do not use it as a medium of exchange. You can thus legally mine it and legally buy it outside Indonesia and hoard it in the country. It is legal, as long as you do not use it as a medium of exchange. Similarly, intricate and complicated legal arguments can most probably be made for all statements regarding the legality of bitcoin in each jurisdiction in the world. This article is clearly not the space to get bogged down in these legal matters. Perhaps this should be stated as a preamble to this section. Obviously referencing newspaper articles about the legality or not of bitcoin in a country may be encyclopedic, but may be far from correct in terms of the actual legal status in a jurisdiction. Most probably not many courtcases regarding this matter have been decided by now. The correct way would be to only allow references to courtcases deciding these legal matters in each jurisdiction. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
648,998,496	` @, that is a good idea. @ , please do not use the term with reference to me simply taking part in a discussion of this talk page. I am not in conflict with you or anyone. Thank you. I just have an opinion that I am willing to state. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
648,998,857	You do not own my thoughts.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
649,004,946	` ==Talkback== As I said before and as I know say at my talkpage. NO LIVE UPDATES they are not allowed, and when you still continue to add them it is disruptive. Wait untill match is finished. `	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
649,005,368	:Yes, I am seriously suggesting that anti-gg hasn’t harassed anyone. I myself know of no reliable report that anyone identifying themselves as opposed to GamerGate has threatened to rape or murder anyone. Please cite your sources.	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
649,006,601	`@, your interpretation of the above term is a perfect example of what I stated previously about only a decided court case can be referenced regarding the interpretation of legal terms: I do not agree with your interpretation: thus, only an Indonesian court can decide the matter at hand - in the Indonesian case. Even a specific law is not the final say: only the interpretation of the courts of the stated law is the final say. Thus only decided court cases can be referenced. I agree with that it is better to avoid using the term ``illegal`` altogether. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
649,031,333	`::::::::I absolutely agree, it is a shame that the best image is non-free, but that's what we have to work with. For this subject matter, between an image that is lower quality but highly representative of reality, and one that is higher quality but not ``real``, I'd go with the highly representative one every time. — @ `	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
649,039,171	== What is your problem. == Everyone on the talk page agrees Under the Dome episode summaries should not be on that paged they should be moved. Don't threaten me, I don't care about a stupid rule.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
649,045,286	, save for this which is not a personal attack.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
649,045,483	(also, this comment was made within minutes of Nick-D 'warning' and I had not seen it after).	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
649,060,943	`I agree. Sadly, even Pevsner's heirs gave this mediocre architecture only a hurried,cursory glance and right up Missing two important things (one a real buttress and some fenestration indicating 16th/17th century original work and I suspect some 1st generation English Palladianism too. It is clear to anyone with any practical knowledge of building and structural engineering that those pilasters (best word I can think of for them) are not buttresses - they are a decorative feature. They are not high enough to be buttresses; they do not protrude enough and they are in the wrong place for a strain to be occurring - especially just 20 years after the facade was originally completed. They are clearly meant to complement the portico - which they do quite well. There is some quite fascinating interesting architecture here, and I fail to see why it can't be mentioned because some people never bothered (or were deterred) from looking for it. == Architect == In hopes of identifying an architect I checked Colvin: no listing for Tracy Park. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
649,082,851	` == Death details? == While no date is mentioned in this article, it is stated in Horik I that Ragnar dies mysteriously in 845. In the article on one of his sons, Sigurd Snake-in-the-Eye, it recounts the story of Ragnar's death by King Ælla, in a pit of snakes, in 865. I wouldn't be surprised if there were more conflicting details in other related articles. Is there a definitive source for this? (or is the problem that of conflicting sources?) I am brining this to the attention of any knowledgeable contributors who may care to address it. - '''' `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
649,087,036	` :: Btw, ``it seems to have become more of a brand name than a noun used to describe double-distorted-word captchas.`` It was never supposed to describe ``double-distorted-word captchas``, that would be actually the misuse of the term we are talking about. And as far as I understand it has always been a brand name. Did you perhaps mean the other way around?`	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
649,087,892	REDIRECT Talk:GSS Panionios FC	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
649,087,955	` == Signature == `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
649,093,951	` ::Thanks again , the mid-19th century embellishing has been sort of attributed to John Elkington Gill, but that seems to be based on no more the fact that he worked on the nearby parish church. My guess if that looking at the architecture, Raikes Davy designed it himself and probably got a surveyor or perhaps even Gill to draw up some working plans. I'll keep searching. If there's any clues, they are in that strange tower, which is why I likened it to the work of Alexander Thomson, but that's more for explaining to readers the ideas and architectural concepts that were floating about at that time, rather than suggesting he designed it - it's not accomplished enough for him anyway. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
649,097,295	` == Ancestry == Why is the origin of his family never discussed in the opening article? What nationality were his parents? Were they Italian, German, English, French, Dutch, Spanish? Both of his parents last names are English but that is just a guess. I would like to see his ancestry listed in the article as is the case with most notable people on wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by :Yes, okay. I have information about this in sources and will add a sentence or so. `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
649,106,274	` ::I copied it from , the person who got me banned -) During the fight, other people were chipping in talking about how they were copying her (I think) signature. So, now I´ve copied it too. Apparently there is no copyright on WP signatures. I have to change some of the measurements to make mine unique. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
649,115,294	==A descendant?== Humphrey Augustus Arthington-Davy, British High Commissioner to the Kingdom of Tonga? The Davy heirlooms from Tracy Park were sold by a Mrs Arthington-Davy as advertised in The Times (London, England), Thursday, Jul 04, 1929; pg. 29; Issue 45246.	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
649,115,662	who was buried according to the Times (London, England), Wednesday, September 01, 1993; pg. 17; Issue 64737, on 6 September 1993.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
649,116,799	==Helen Arthington-Davy== It seems that Helen Artington-Davy who sold Tracy Park and later the family heirlooms, was actually a Mrs Hodges (of Danestone House, Aberdeen). She renounced the name Hodges in favour of Arthington-Davy for herself and her sons Tom Jeffrey and William Henry Hodges in an announcement in The Times (London, England), Thursday, Sep 22, 1927; pg. 24; Issue 44693.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
649,118,030	` == The Gamergate Conspiracy == We have discussed at some length above whether Gamergate should be described as a ``controversy,`` as we do now, or as a ``movement”, as Gamergate supporters apparently prefer. The sources clearly have a hard time finding the precise language to use here. So do we. Let’s look at all the options. A movement is “a group of people working together to advance their shared political, social, or artistic ideas.” The members, or the leaders, of a movement are identifiable people, and the shared ideas are typically put forth in a manifesto or platform. Examples include the labor movement, the temperance movement, the Impressionist movement, and the Chautauqua movement. Even the resistance movements of the Second World War were characterized by organization; indeed, organization is what distinguishes an “organized resistance,” and a resistance necessarily adheres to stated principles. Gamergate lacks leadership, organization, or a statement of principles. Gamergate is not a movement; nomovement come to mind that lacks either leadership and manifesto. A controversy is “a dispute, a prolonged public disagreement.” Controversy surrounds Gamergate; indeed, that controversy has made Gamergate notable. Some have argued here at some length that, while controversy surrounds Gamergate, Gamergate is not a controversy. They do have a point: our sources do write of “Gamergate supporters,” but no one writes about “Watergate supporters” or “Tea Pot Dome supporters.” Our current lede uses “controversy” as a generous fiction: it's not perfect, but it’s been satisfactory for some time and I have no strong objection to maintaining it. We do have a word that does apply rigorously to Gamergate as it is described by the sources: that word is conspiracy A conspiracy is “a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful,” and this is precisely what our sources describe. Gamergate’s absence of visible leadership and the lack of expressed principles aren’t compatible with the behaviors of movements but are, of course, quite common in conspiracies from Alcibiades to Cataline and onward. “Plot” might be an alternative to “conspiracy,” though it is probably even more pejorative. “Scheme” would also work in its American usage, but its use in British English to describe a governmental or institutional programme would cause confusion. “Crusade” captures the fervor of Gamergate’s supporters and the violence of their sentiments, but crusades have a stated goal. Likewise, Gamergate cannot be a “campaign” or a “drive” as it lacks an objective toward which to it steer. “Cabal” is possible, I suppose. But “conspiracy” is precise. “Conspiracy” also lets us finesse the problem of Gamergate being said to “claim” to be a movement. Who can credibly assert that claim? Someone might claim that Gamergate is a clam, or a festival, or a joke: how should we judge? If someone claims it’s one thing, and someone else claims it’s not, how do we distinguish? In two ways: WP:RS and WP:FRINGE. Following the latter, it’s hard to see that Gamergate can be made to fit the definition of “movement,” but it clearly fits the definition of “conspiracy” perfectly. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
649,129,378	== Infobox picture == The picture in the infobox is very misleading - it shows a small group of surviving Victorian buildings which I believe are used as offices. The hospital proper looks nothing like that, most of it having been built in the last 10 years.	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
649,130,424	If your going to get my information wrong can you take the page down entirely? Thank you	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
649,130,943	: There are several issues with the Sageworks article: : 1. Sageworks engages in the questionable practice of gathering protected business data and reselling it for a profit. Given their tricky indemnity clause in the Terms of Use, I sense that they know this and seek to shield themselves against potential legal attacks by irate business owners. This needs to be stated in the article. : 2. The very sensitive data they resell is offered online. They are thus a high value target for cybercriminals. That needs to be stated to make the reader aware of the risks. If Sageworks systems are broken into, the attack will not be made public as they are a private company. Unless there is a well publicized law suit (unlikely in the private business space).	2,015	false	article	blocked	dev	false
649,136,590	== Russia == Asian part of Russia (Far Eastern Federal District, Siberian Federal District and Tyumen Oblast) has estimated population of 29,065,600 on January 1, 2014 source.	2,015	false	article	random	train	false
649,139,020	` ==Shit stirrer!== Need I say more? If the women of Wikipedia need you to fight their corner - then they have a serous problem. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
649,139,717	`::::::::I won't edit war with a troll, but I do feel this needs to be seen . `	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
649,139,813	` ::* I should have also mentioned this: The sources you use must give more than passing mentions to a topic. In regards to the Java magazine source, it isn't independent. The magazine covered it in the context of Java; they were trying to promote Java. There needs to be coverage outside of the context of OpenStreetMap and Java. Otherwise, I can't say that the topic is notable enough for an article. Cheers, '''''' • `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
649,140,150	` ::*Pot stirring? well you and the militant and trouble making wimmin of this project are the ones to recognize that. I applaud you. Why not block me too Coffee? You can really get your name in lights then. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
649,142,585	` ::::::Ah coffee, you may be able to help: I remember once when I was a boy at school, clandestinely watching a totally shocking film where nuns masturbated while a handsome priest was burn at the stake. I doubt Eric is very handsome, but tonight I am minded of that film. can anyone remember its name - I think it may have had Jeanne Moreau in it? `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
649,144,175	` :Nothing for you to apologise for Victoria. This block will pass soon enough. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
649,145,995	` :::::You do seem to be rather an impetuous person Coffee; I expect you'll grow out of it. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
649,146,477	` ::::::PS: can we just have the example (diff) of this dreadful transgression. Purely for the amusement of our more sane editors. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
649,150,419	` :::Thanks [[, you're right, sorry, I am indeed using the 2002 edition I was looking at the page listing all the editions and it looked like 1980 was the final edition. The 2002 is ISBN 0 300 09733 6. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
649,152,573	` ::::::::*Oh well! Coffee is obviously too ashamed to post the diff, so I will and I stand by every word of it. What a fucked up place this now is, when posting the truth earns a block. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
649,157,123	I'm afraid that writing content does not preclude me from having or voicing opinions. It just means I have less time to play silly buggers with fools. Sorry, don't seem to be able to sifn with this phone thingn but c'est moi.	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
649,175,937	` :The promo for this essay on the author's page links to Game of Thrones, the TV series. Perhaps this info should be added to the ``Reception`` secton of that page. `	2,015	false	article	random	test	false
649,184,807	` == Your correction == Dear Bichonen: Your correction of the word hamlet is most appreciated but there was absolutely no need to add a snide edit summary ``please stop insisting on ``Hamlet``, 122.xx``. I was not insisting on hamlet. It was the first time I edit the word. I just assumed from seeing it with a capital H on Long Island that it was part of the town name and I probably was correct. In any case, you clarified your correction and I will not undo your edit. , on the other hand, just undid my entire copy-edit not just the word hamlet and didn't bother to clarify why he did it which was a shitty thing to do. I had other copy-edits that were correct yet he just undid them all without regard to my input or my feelings. `	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
649,194,900	== Bullshit == What the fuck are you annoying my edits on Wikipedia? Such a bullshit you're bitch! Wikipedia is free to everyone for edit asshole!! (anonymous) 06:30 28 February 2015 (UTC)	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	true
649,200,387	I promise I will not attack or make uncontributive edits anymore	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
649,203,152	` :: The reviewing editor delisted article and made it C-class, while before previous GA-review it was B-class. Even if all closely paraphrased text had been fixed, he would have not known it, since the editor didn't bother to find all the closely paraphrased text. ::The talk page is overloaded with old threads and when some pro-Russian readers (who are angry that the article is written from an academic POV, rather than Russian government's POV), read there titles like ``Changes by UA Victory``, some openly harass me there or majority of them badmouth me outside Wikipedia. Should not old replies by automatically archived? `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
649,214,192	` Why have you changed the image again? The text is now all but unreadable. It is now forced into single-word lines, extending down past the reference section. ,It looks ridiculous. You quoted IMGSIZE, yet again, in the summary. That policy states: In general, do not use px without very good reason What that means is, the policy needs not to be unilaterally enforced at all costs. If, as in this instance, there is a need for a change in size, it is permissible. The policy further states: Where px is used, the resulting image should be no more than 500 pixels tall and no more than 400 pixels wide, for comfortable display on the smallest devices in common use. I have already (and repeatedly) demonstrated that upsizing to 250px is all that required. (I bet even 220px would work). That is well within the limits. The change to the picture itself is negligible, and therefore does not impact the article negatively in any way. It only servers to benefit the article by making the text within the caption more wieldy and easier to read. It also eliminates the impact of needlessly extending the picture frame all the way down to the refs. Surely you can see this. Since you're quoting this policy so much, surely you know that it does not prohibit this edit. I have asked repeatedly that you look at the effect on the article, both before and after the edit, and in doing so,. surely you see the need for this edit. Yet you insist on repeatedly reverting, which only serves a detriment to the article and is tantamount to vandalism. Is that really want you want for this article? - '''' `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
649,215,972	` ::Yup... not everyone using WP knows to change their preferences. And what about the casul users? What about people without accounts? You say I'm ``trying to force this on everyone`` as if I'm doing something harmful. It's just the opposite. My edit only served to benefit the article. It is you that is needlessly forcing everyone to jump through your hoops, and all based on what? A policy that doesn't even apply? Or a need to control the content on this page. You made an unecessary revert, and instead of admitting you were wrong, and just letting the edit stand, you are trying to needlessly argue the point. - '''' `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
649,216,129	(mine was preset at 120px, by the way)	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
649,218,389	Brutal force is your ultimate argument. Keep perverting.	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
649,261,947	: Not done: as you are WP:SHOUTING and you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. -	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
649,263,952	` :. In a fair project, what you said would be completely true. But, the project stinks of Bishonen's rancid smell. As I said in my valid and now removed comment, Bishonen's few asses always rush to cover up her shit, like Dr. Michel just did. He removed my comment and blocked me from making more comments. So, do you really want me to allow Bishonen, Drmies et al to do the same to my regular admin account knowing what they get away with on here? No, I don't think so. There are billions of IP's for us to throw away and make our points. I only have one account here. By the way, many editors are now using throw away IP's. The project's culture not them is to blame. `	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
649,274,027	` == Not Good for Straight Forward Understanding of Advances == Without clear categorization of advances tracked through time, how can one get any meaning out of the article? For example, tracking the maximum number of quantum bits in a single entanglement according to date would be much more meaningful than the current listing of ad hoc, haphazard, and arbitrary ``achievements``. Also comparing the number of quantum bits needed for various types of tasks such as breaking encryption would be very informative in comparison to current accomplishments, because it would expose how little progress we have really made. A great example of this would be to show how many quantum bits the D-Wave machines achieve in individual entanglements. This would expose the misguided impressions generated when D-Wave talks about the number of quantum bits on a single board as that has almost nothing to do with the number of quantum bits achieved in a individual entanglements. `	2,015	false	article	random	test	false
649,294,296	` :Correction, you're not even an admin, you're just an idiot it seems. '''''' `	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	true
649,340,372	:Thanks for the fix! Everyone's everything needs more coffee always That's one of the laws of the universe I think.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
649,343,679	` ==Sockpuppet investigation== `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
649,358,130	Jam Sebastian]]March 1 2015]== Shawarma32 Wow, you really want this person die in advance. Please stop giving death dates to a living person. You were too offensive. ==[[	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
649,377,897	` ::::what you've done makes sense to me, its probably not controversial even if its wrong, I already found something in the press last week about Northern Fury round 1 matchup against a qualifier, whereas this article has this as a Round 5 matchup. :::::Looking forward to the next NNSW draw on Google, to see if their draw organiser has any more success groping the boobs of the gal holding the box with the names in it. LOL. I'm hoping that next year we'll see draws each round at simialr times - none of the pre-ordained-draw-112-balls-at-once NSW shit. ``OOhhh, winner round 5 ball 98 has drawn winner round 5 ball 103`` four months before we know what the teams are. FAR more exciting to make the draw when the teams are known.`	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
649,429,224	` == Collapsing of My Questions and Not a Reply to Them == You collapsed some of my comments, but left TVH's reply to them, addressing me, outside the collapse. That was very confusing, because TVH appeared to be replying to something that I didn't say. You want to start to get statements of agreement. So do I. But I can't start agreeing unless I know what I am being asked to agree with. If I feel that I am being pushed to start agreeing with things while having to unhide things to see what the agreement is, I won't be able to agree. I don't think that I am being that difficult; I just want to know what issues are the blocking issues. If I shouldn't ask what is being said to be horrible, then why not hide the ``horrible`` comment rather than my puzzlement about it? If you were clumsy in deciding what to collapse, then I understand. But if you think that I shouldn't be asking questions about harsh statements, then maybe either the harsh statements should be collapsed or maybe I would prefer to see a more active style of moderation. Maybe I don't understand. `	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
649,452,071	To the contrary, if you read my intent. However, there is still the matter of the graph made from census bureau data sourced from healthsentinel with permission that expands the existing graph from the CDC. Also, there is the matter of the peer reviewed, academic journal article from Sage Publications by Dr. Miller showing the correlation of infant mortality rates and vaccination schedules. I would like to include this since this page is about the controversy and not the vaccines themselves. This article explains the want of people for further testing on the safety of so many vaccines in a short period of time.	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
649,456,132	Template talk:Prussian princes You successfully defended his ignorance. Who are you to make such judgments? And who are you to judge others? Maybe you want to rewrite history? You successfully defended his ignorance. You remove the part of the article - this is vandalism.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
649,456,890	== Template talk:Prussian princes == You successfully defended his ignorance. Who are you to make such judgments? And who are you to judge others? Maybe you want to rewrite history? You successfully defended his ignorance. You remove the part of the article - this is vandalism.	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	true
649,464,565	be honest and tell me	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
649,465,971	== Iowa 370 == Why did you move Iowa Highway 370 to County Road H10? I have some reservations about the title, but I'd like to hear your reasons why. –	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
649,487,830	` == lol == ``Added to this is the influence of futuristic and fictional themes[7] relevant to life in American late capitalist society, with Alvin Toffler's book The Third Wave being a notable point of reference.[8][9]`` <-Seriously? I think my IQ dropped 10 points just after reading this.`	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
649,489,178	` == Did AIPAC write this? == It's a bullshit propaganda piece full of irrelevant shit inserted to inflame opinion against the Palestinians. We know it was an attack against civilians, do we really need to know a father was killed with his daughter? In an encyclopedia article? And a subsection called ``Palestinian glorification of the attack``? Fucking seriously? Wikipedia is a joke when it comes to these topics. Whoever has more people editing the page gets to decide the truth. What a joke.`	2,015	false	article	blocked	test	true
649,489,562	::::::::::His argument seems sound to me and the comparison valid. Sincerely, anyone.	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
649,496,116	WebStorm is notable. I don't understand why it is claimed that WebStorm is not notable. It is a popular software app, and I've heard several people mention it on online forums. A Google Search yields 572,000 results.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
649,516,774	` == R1b1c == The R1b1c in Sardinia is M18 a clade that is absent in all sub-Saharan and other African populations; It was only detected in Lebanon, Sardinia and Corsica; Its ancestral clade is V88 and V88 clades are most common in sub-saharn Africa but R1b-V88 itself is not sub-saharan due to its ancestor P25 (ancestor of both V88 and M269) is not sub-Saharan African but from the Eastern Eurasia where in turn its ultimate ancestor M207 (R1b/R1a) derives from; Thus before R1b (P25/V88) entered sub-Sahran Africa (from Eurasia/NearEast) it must have split into subclade M18 and moved along the Mediterranean as for the distribution of V88 clades in sub-Sahran Africa {Cruciani et al 2010}: ``In summary, our data indicate a significant male contribution from northern Africa (and ultimately Asia) to the gene pool of the central Sahel. The trans-Saharan population movements resulting in this genetic pattern would seem to mirror the spread of the proto-Chadic languages, and most likely took place during the early mid Holocene, a period when giant paleolakes may have provided a corridor for human migrations across what is now the Sahara desert.``Cruciani et al 2010: http://www.nature.com/ejhg/journal/v18/n7/full/ejhg2009231a.html note the complete absence of M18 in Africa (Table1.) `	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
649,517,808	:: In response; But Boattini 2013 did and he equally found R1b1c to be only M18 (2.4% / 82 smaples); The images you have are not representing the specified subclades tested (or they were not tested) as also by R1b1a2 (M269); Some bloggers and forum users (Mr. Rocca) have more details from the Fraccalacci et al 2014 study and deceiphered for example (R1b-U152) frequency; Try to find these specific tables;	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
649,520,252	::: In response; No exactly not; The V88 clades in the sub-Saharan Chadic speaking Areas came (directly) from North Africa (ultimately) from Eurasia (P25 being the ancestral clade); M18 which is a clade of V88	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
649,521,622	` == This pool page == 1- I did not make any edits whatsoever on the President of the USA page for Wikipedia. There may be additional individuals logging in under this User Talk address. 2- I did not attack what's its name (SynchroCat?!!!) but it seems from the response that some editors at Wikipedia have a f- raging disease of attacking anyone outside the pool of Wikipedia editors that may question their judgement. You need to read the log before you label my comments ``attack``. For the record I dont think you are a f-gg-t either.`	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	true
649,521,895	` == Your FYI about ``my`` edits == Did not make any edits whatsoever on the Vice President of the USA page for Wikipedia. There may be additional individuals logging in under this User Talk address.`	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
649,522,098	` == The attack? == I did not attack what's its name (SynchroCat?!!!) but it seems from the response that some editors at Wikipedia have a f- raging disease of attacking anyone outside the pool of Wikipedia editors that may question their judgement. You need to read the log before you label my comments ``attack``. For the record I dont think you are a f-gg-t either.`	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
649,522,360	` == The attack? == I did not attack what's its name (SynchroCat?!!!) but it seems from the response that some editors at Wikipedia have a f- raging disease of attacking anyone outside the pool of Wikipedia editors that may question their judgement. You need to read the log before you label my comments ``attack``. For the record I dont think you are a f-gg-t either. So you dont know how to read? You just know how to use the delete button? How delightful for your supervisors.`	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	true
649,523,010	== Your Type-Os == You didnt like my comments on your type? Dont be a cry baby, ok? You breakin mah hard hat.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	true
649,523,373	:::: In response; I can only advise and refer to the Cruciani et al 2010 study - link and quote in my first post; Again, M18 (V88from Northern Africa< (Cruciani et al 2010) and ultimately stems from Eurasia (as all other R1b clades) via P25	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
649,525,178	I removed nothing. I replaced what you removed. What are you playing at?	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
649,527,327	Mr. Miller's paper is a secondary source, peer-reviewed journal article from a reputable publisher. This article has been further cited by other peer reviewed papers. The primary source for this article are the mortality reports from each country's mortality reports. The correlation explains people's attitudes and concerns. This is not an article on vaccine safety, it is on the controversy. This article clearly gives a basis for the controversy.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
649,528,694	::::AndyTheGrump either you are referring to the graph, or you are simply wrong about Mr. Miller's paper. Primary source-raw data; secondary source-Mr. Miller's paper; tertiary source-WP citing the paper.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
649,531,540	:::::So you are restating, and begging me to accuse you of hacking? Really, and you say I'm wasting your time?	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
649,531,699	::::::Very descriptive, NOT. Not, helpful...Since the point is proven that the paper is a secondary source from a reputable publisher thus meets guidelines, are there any new objections?	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
649,532,848	As I said before, there appears to have been a bot glitch. I understand and am familiar with bots. I'm guessing it happened because many were editing at the same time? I don't know, but I didn't purposefully delete anything. Jytog, I understand vaccine controversy, biology, medicine, child rearing, and many other things very well. I may be a new user, and my thoughts are just as valid as yours. After I had edited all I saw was AndyTheGrump having deleted what I had just written along with many other things. Upon further inspection I saw the bot. That does not change that AndyTheGrump deleted my comments throwing the baby out with the bathwater. All I did was save mine to get intertwined in the glitch.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
649,535,888	==Good news== i would replace the shit that is the real EvergreenFir, to transform Wikipedia into a vandalism, muahahaha.....	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
649,536,686	I would appreciate that, Jytdog. Here's a question to ponder, however. I saved my edit and in the process caused a glitch and a controversy. An experienced user undid what had been done wholesale, including my new edit, without looking to see the connection to the bot. I'm not leaving. I'm not ashamed of being a noob. You were a noob once and made mistakes. It happens. Though the condescension in you help is truly not helpful. Noobs look like noobs no matter the format. Condescending people, mean people, and hot heads who jump to conslusions make asses of themselves in any format. ==Making Vaccine Controversy Whole Again== It appears we have been affected by a bot glitch of some sort. At any rate, one of my comments has been lost in the space-time continuum. Other's comments have been deleted. Jytdog, TenOfAllTrades, and TheRedPenofDoom are you all whole again?	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
649,537,688	:Fuck you The Anome, Porn for you.	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	true
649,540,465	::::::::::I have read it, and I continue to see that Mr. Miller's is in compliance. Please stop placing the link and place the quote that states this peer reviewed, academic journal article from a reputable publishing house does not comply with standards. AndyTheGrump, you just made my point. Thank you. Miller used primary, Miller's work itself is secondary. There are other peer reviewed, academic journal articles that cite Miller's, would you prefer those also?	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
649,550,087	== Rhine Campaign of 1796 == Hi, Battle of Kehl failed at FA because there were no responses other than an image review. I'll resub in a week or two. What do you think about getting this entire series ready for A class and up? We can organize this, I'm sure.	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
649,551,578	` == Yoshendi == Hello! I acknowledge why you have deleted my page ``Yoshendi``, but it is still my personal belief that Yoshendi balls so hard, he is significant enough to be entitled to one article on Wikipedia. No matter how much we disagree, we can both agree on the fact that he does ball fairly hard. Thanks for your time. Suck a dick, Deb, Yoshendi`	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
649,565,424	== I have learned your secret pastime ==	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
649,576,758	*If you don't mind a bit of advice, what more details or info should I be including in the articles to get them up to GA status? Always willing to listen to good info.	2,015	true	user	random	test	false

648,914,638

` == Aftermath section == There is a photo of the memorial at ANZAC Cove, with a dedication written underneath. With the photo in it's original thumb size, the dedication is basically unreadable. I slightly enlarged the photo, to make the dedication easier to read. This is a clear improvement. I'm not sure why, but some busy-bodies keep blindly reverting this edit, obviously without looking at the effects on the text. I'd rather not hit 3RR, so hopefully these people will knock it off. - '''' `

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

648,915,304

` :::That's besides the point. The image needs to be slightly upsized. Just look, instead of blindly reverting.- '''' `

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

648,915,677

` == Gallipoli Campaign == Hello, Regarding your reversions to the Gallipoli Campaign article, the relevant policy specifies that image sizes should generally not be fixed. Please see WP:IMGSIZE. Your rude talk page posts regarding this (alValtos&diff;=648899307&oldid;=643781757 are not at all helpful, or even well informed given that you plainly haven't read the guideline which you abused Charles for not reading. You will be blocked again if this continues. :How many talk pages are going to discuss this on? It's already addressed on the article talk, as well as charlesdrakew. I don't need or want it on mine as well. Again, I will ask that you look at WHY I upsized, throwing policy at me and before blindly reverting. - '''' `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

648,917,662

` ::I made it clear I did not want this discussion on my talkpage, yet you bring right back again? Since when is that ok? And, you specifically added ``also edit warring`` in the block reason? I'd like you to clearly explain exactly how I ``edit warred`` (2 reverts, of 2 different users, 2 days apart?) And how am I ``harassing`` anyone``? This block was unnecessary. Admins that make blocks in error can remove their own blocks, and I'd like you to do that. I shouldn't have to wait for another admin to come along. - '''' `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

648,919,229

` ::Yes, and on that note, I read WP:IMGSIZE, and it specifically states; In general, do not use px without very good reason; upright=scaling factor is preferred wherever sensible. Where px is used, the resulting image should be no more than 500 pixels tall and no more than 400 pixels wide, for comfortable display on the smallest devices in common use. ::I do have a ``very good reason``, the text below the image was unreadable at it's previous size. Additionally, the policy further states that the upsize is not to exceed ``500 pixels``. I only upsized to 250. Therefor, I did not violate IMGSIZE. However, it appears that the 2 editors, and an admin, that while quoting this policy did not read it. The editors blindly reverts my edit, clearly without bothering to look at the impact of the revert, and now an admin has blindly blocked me for... what? An image policy I did not violate? An edit warring policy I did not violate? A harassment policy I did not violate? There is also an accusation of rudeness, that I dispute. I had, if anything, shown my aggravation at what is becoming a growing problem here. The constant pushing of poorly crafted and poorly understood policies, through the practice of blind reverts, often to the detriment of the article and therefore the project. ::If my comments came across as rude, I do apologize, but the reverts were unnecessary, as was this block. - '''' `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

648,921,516

February 25, 2015 6:46 PM You deleted our research about Miss Earth 2015. You deleted all the TBA lists in Upcoming National Pageants. Now, we are now having a hard time for researching for every country you've deleted. Thanks for the damages you've done.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

648,946,436

:::::::By the way, this wasn't me. Nor was [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kenji_Miyazawa&diff;=603518401&oldid;=602008035 the first user to revert you. So that's two more users who oppose you on this issue. ()

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

648,953,695

== InfoBox Portrait == A better info box image might be the subject’s portrait, available here and authorized by the subject.

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

648,980,101

::Thanks for the reply. I disagree that the blood is more significant that the drooling. The drooling sets up every single alien encountersome fool always steps in it, and then BAM. Although it is not covered in the body, it should as it is pretty central to the identity of the Xenomorph. And yes, it should be in the secretions section. But I do think the drooling is one of the central signatures of the creature. and a continuous visual motif.

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

648,988,647

` A severe issue that needs discussing: is this a satirical allusion to Romney’s ``governing as a severe conservative?`` How can an issue be severe? And you aren't just whistling Dixie,. Is it satire, perhaps? ``Stalwart adductions!`` ``Truistic allegations!`` ``Errors are inexorable!`` A ``dubitable article`` is consigned to ``go without rectification.`` (of our bodily humors?) A ``relatively nascent editor``! An article that is ``luridly lengthy and tumescent``! (Hello, Fred Merkle) I think TRPoD was right to hat this. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

648,990,733

` == B-cell lymphoma? == Came across this review: whose abstract includes `` B cell lymphoma was positively associated with phenoxy herbicides and the organophosphorus herbicide glyphosate.`` Should this go in? `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

648,993,834

== Under the Dome == I did explain why the plot should be on the episode page so it is easier to navigate.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

648,994,436

::: TRPoD is correct in regard to canvassing and its attendant woes. Speaking of the state of the article, I believe a talk page is intended for discussing concrete improvements? It's hard to find an actionable suggestion amid the luridly lengthy and tumescently inexorable errors. If the poster believes there is an NPOV concern in the article, the 25+ pages of archives are thataway and discuss this at length, concluding in a consensus that is reflected in the article.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

648,995,356

` :I am not a legal expert, but trying to put too much detail in the legal section will be difficult since only actual court cases in each jurisdiction will decide whether bitcoin is illegal in that jurisdiction or not. For example: it is stated above: ``The claim that bitcoin is ``illegal`` in Indonesia is based on the warning of the Bank Indonesia, which claimed that bitcoin is not a ``legal medium of exchange in Indonesia``. Thus, bitcoin is legal as long as you do not use it as a medium of exchange. You can thus legally mine it and legally buy it outside Indonesia and hoard it in the country. It is legal, as long as you do not use it as a medium of exchange. Similarly, intricate and complicated legal arguments can most probably be made for all statements regarding the legality of bitcoin in each jurisdiction in the world. This article is clearly not the space to get bogged down in these legal matters. Perhaps this should be stated as a preamble to this section. Obviously referencing newspaper articles about the legality or not of bitcoin in a country may be encyclopedic, but may be far from correct in terms of the actual legal status in a jurisdiction. Most probably not many courtcases regarding this matter have been decided by now. The correct way would be to only allow references to courtcases deciding these legal matters in each jurisdiction. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

648,998,496

` @, that is a good idea. @ , please do not use the term with reference to me simply taking part in a discussion of this talk page. I am not in conflict with you or anyone. Thank you. I just have an opinion that I am willing to state. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

648,998,857

You do not own my thoughts.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

649,004,946

` ==Talkback== As I said before and as I know say at my talkpage. NO LIVE UPDATES they are not allowed, and when you still continue to add them it is disruptive. Wait untill match is finished. `

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

649,005,368

:Yes, I am seriously suggesting that anti-gg hasn’t harassed anyone. I myself know of no reliable report that anyone identifying themselves as opposed to GamerGate has threatened to rape or murder anyone. Please cite your sources.

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

649,006,601

`@, your interpretation of the above term is a perfect example of what I stated previously about only a decided court case can be referenced regarding the interpretation of legal terms: I do not agree with your interpretation: thus, only an Indonesian court can decide the matter at hand - in the Indonesian case. Even a specific law is not the final say: only the interpretation of the courts of the stated law is the final say. Thus only decided court cases can be referenced. I agree with that it is better to avoid using the term ``illegal`` altogether. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

649,031,333

`::::::::I absolutely agree, it is a shame that the best image is non-free, but that's what we have to work with. For this subject matter, between an image that is lower quality but highly representative of reality, and one that is higher quality but not ``real``, I'd go with the highly representative one every time. — @ `

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

649,039,171

== What is your problem. == Everyone on the talk page agrees Under the Dome episode summaries should not be on that paged they should be moved. Don't threaten me, I don't care about a stupid rule.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

649,045,286

, save for this which is not a personal attack.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

649,045,483

(also, this comment was made within minutes of Nick-D 'warning' and I had not seen it after).

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

649,060,943

`I agree. Sadly, even Pevsner's heirs gave this mediocre architecture only a hurried,cursory glance and right up Missing two important things (one a real buttress and some fenestration indicating 16th/17th century original work and I suspect some 1st generation English Palladianism too. It is clear to anyone with any practical knowledge of building and structural engineering that those pilasters (best word I can think of for them) are not buttresses - they are a decorative feature. They are not high enough to be buttresses; they do not protrude enough and they are in the wrong place for a strain to be occurring - especially just 20 years after the facade was originally completed. They are clearly meant to complement the portico - which they do quite well. There is some quite fascinating interesting architecture here, and I fail to see why it can't be mentioned because some people never bothered (or were deterred) from looking for it. == Architect == In hopes of identifying an architect I checked Colvin: no listing for Tracy Park. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

649,082,851

` == Death details? == While no date is mentioned in this article, it is stated in Horik I that Ragnar dies mysteriously in 845. In the article on one of his sons, Sigurd Snake-in-the-Eye, it recounts the story of Ragnar's death by King Ælla, in a pit of snakes, in 865. I wouldn't be surprised if there were more conflicting details in other related articles. Is there a definitive source for this? (or is the problem that of conflicting sources?) I am brining this to the attention of any knowledgeable contributors who may care to address it. - '''' `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

649,087,036

` :: Btw, ``it seems to have become more of a brand name than a noun used to describe double-distorted-word captchas.`` It was never supposed to describe ``double-distorted-word captchas``, that would be actually the misuse of the term we are talking about. And as far as I understand it has always been a brand name. Did you perhaps mean the other way around?`

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

649,087,892

REDIRECT Talk:GSS Panionios FC

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

649,087,955

` == Signature == `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

649,093,951

` ::Thanks again , the mid-19th century embellishing has been sort of attributed to John Elkington Gill, but that seems to be based on no more the fact that he worked on the nearby parish church. My guess if that looking at the architecture, Raikes Davy designed it himself and probably got a surveyor or perhaps even Gill to draw up some working plans. I'll keep searching. If there's any clues, they are in that strange tower, which is why I likened it to the work of Alexander Thomson, but that's more for explaining to readers the ideas and architectural concepts that were floating about at that time, rather than suggesting he designed it - it's not accomplished enough for him anyway. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

649,097,295

` == Ancestry == Why is the origin of his family never discussed in the opening article? What nationality were his parents? Were they Italian, German, English, French, Dutch, Spanish? Both of his parents last names are English but that is just a guess. I would like to see his ancestry listed in the article as is the case with most notable people on wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by :Yes, okay. I have information about this in sources and will add a sentence or so. `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

649,106,274

` ::I copied it from , the person who got me banned -) During the fight, other people were chipping in talking about how they were copying her (I think) signature. So, now I´ve copied it too. Apparently there is no copyright on WP signatures. I have to change some of the measurements to make mine unique. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

649,115,294

==A descendant?== Humphrey Augustus Arthington-Davy, British High Commissioner to the Kingdom of Tonga? The Davy heirlooms from Tracy Park were sold by a Mrs Arthington-Davy as advertised in The Times (London, England), Thursday, Jul 04, 1929; pg. 29; Issue 45246.

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

649,115,662

who was buried according to the Times (London, England), Wednesday, September 01, 1993; pg. 17; Issue 64737, on 6 September 1993.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

649,116,799

==Helen Arthington-Davy== It seems that Helen Artington-Davy who sold Tracy Park and later the family heirlooms, was actually a Mrs Hodges (of Danestone House, Aberdeen). She renounced the name Hodges in favour of Arthington-Davy for herself and her sons Tom Jeffrey and William Henry Hodges in an announcement in The Times (London, England), Thursday, Sep 22, 1927; pg. 24; Issue 44693.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

649,118,030

` == The Gamergate Conspiracy == We have discussed at some length above whether Gamergate should be described as a ``controversy,`` as we do now, or as a ``movement”, as Gamergate supporters apparently prefer. The sources clearly have a hard time finding the precise language to use here. So do we. Let’s look at all the options. A movement is “a group of people working together to advance their shared political, social, or artistic ideas.” The members, or the leaders, of a movement are identifiable people, and the shared ideas are typically put forth in a manifesto or platform. Examples include the labor movement, the temperance movement, the Impressionist movement, and the Chautauqua movement. Even the resistance movements of the Second World War were characterized by organization; indeed, organization is what distinguishes an “organized resistance,” and a resistance necessarily adheres to stated principles. Gamergate lacks leadership, organization, or a statement of principles. Gamergate is not a movement; nomovement come to mind that lacks either leadership and manifesto. A controversy is “a dispute, a prolonged public disagreement.” Controversy surrounds Gamergate; indeed, that controversy has made Gamergate notable. Some have argued here at some length that, while controversy surrounds Gamergate, Gamergate is not a controversy. They do have a point: our sources do write of “Gamergate supporters,” but no one writes about “Watergate supporters” or “Tea Pot Dome supporters.” Our current lede uses “controversy” as a generous fiction: it's not perfect, but it’s been satisfactory for some time and I have no strong objection to maintaining it. We do have a word that does apply rigorously to Gamergate as it is described by the sources: that word is conspiracy A conspiracy is “a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful,” and this is precisely what our sources describe. Gamergate’s absence of visible leadership and the lack of expressed principles aren’t compatible with the behaviors of movements but are, of course, quite common in conspiracies from Alcibiades to Cataline and onward. “Plot” might be an alternative to “conspiracy,” though it is probably even more pejorative. “Scheme” would also work in its American usage, but its use in British English to describe a governmental or institutional programme would cause confusion. “Crusade” captures the fervor of Gamergate’s supporters and the violence of their sentiments, but crusades have a stated goal. Likewise, Gamergate cannot be a “campaign” or a “drive” as it lacks an objective toward which to it steer. “Cabal” is possible, I suppose. But “conspiracy” is precise. “Conspiracy” also lets us finesse the problem of Gamergate being said to “claim” to be a movement. Who can credibly assert that claim? Someone might claim that Gamergate is a clam, or a festival, or a joke: how should we judge? If someone claims it’s one thing, and someone else claims it’s not, how do we distinguish? In two ways: WP:RS and WP:FRINGE. Following the latter, it’s hard to see that Gamergate can be made to fit the definition of “movement,” but it clearly fits the definition of “conspiracy” perfectly. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

649,129,378

== Infobox picture == The picture in the infobox is very misleading - it shows a small group of surviving Victorian buildings which I believe are used as offices. The hospital proper looks nothing like that, most of it having been built in the last 10 years.

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

649,130,424

If your going to get my information wrong can you take the page down entirely? Thank you

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

649,130,943

: There are several issues with the Sageworks article: : 1. Sageworks engages in the questionable practice of gathering protected business data and reselling it for a profit. Given their tricky indemnity clause in the Terms of Use, I sense that they know this and seek to shield themselves against potential legal attacks by irate business owners. This needs to be stated in the article. : 2. The very sensitive data they resell is offered online. They are thus a high value target for cybercriminals. That needs to be stated to make the reader aware of the risks. If Sageworks systems are broken into, the attack will not be made public as they are a private company. Unless there is a well publicized law suit (unlikely in the private business space).

2,015

false

article

blocked

dev

false

649,136,590

== Russia == Asian part of Russia (Far Eastern Federal District, Siberian Federal District and Tyumen Oblast) has estimated population of 29,065,600 on January 1, 2014 source.

2,015

false

article

random

train

false

649,139,020

` ==Shit stirrer!== Need I say more? If the women of Wikipedia need you to fight their corner - then they have a serous problem. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

649,139,717

`::::::::I won't edit war with a troll, but I do feel this needs to be seen . `

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

649,139,813

` ::* I should have also mentioned this: The sources you use must give more than passing mentions to a topic. In regards to the Java magazine source, it isn't independent. The magazine covered it in the context of Java; they were trying to promote Java. There needs to be coverage outside of the context of OpenStreetMap and Java. Otherwise, I can't say that the topic is notable enough for an article. Cheers, '''''' • `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

649,140,150

` ::*Pot stirring? well you and the militant and trouble making wimmin of this project are the ones to recognize that. I applaud you. Why not block me too Coffee? You can really get your name in lights then. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

649,142,585

` ::::::Ah coffee, you may be able to help: I remember once when I was a boy at school, clandestinely watching a totally shocking film where nuns masturbated while a handsome priest was burn at the stake. I doubt Eric is very handsome, but tonight I am minded of that film. can anyone remember its name - I think it may have had Jeanne Moreau in it? `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

649,144,175

` :Nothing for you to apologise for Victoria. This block will pass soon enough. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

649,145,995

` :::::You do seem to be rather an impetuous person Coffee; I expect you'll grow out of it. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

649,146,477

` ::::::PS: can we just have the example (diff) of this dreadful transgression. Purely for the amusement of our more sane editors. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

649,150,419

` :::Thanks [[, you're right, sorry, I am indeed using the 2002 edition I was looking at the page listing all the editions and it looked like 1980 was the final edition. The 2002 is ISBN 0 300 09733 6. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

649,152,573

` ::::::::*Oh well! Coffee is obviously too ashamed to post the diff, so I will and I stand by every word of it. What a fucked up place this now is, when posting the truth earns a block. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

649,157,123

I'm afraid that writing content does not preclude me from having or voicing opinions. It just means I have less time to play silly buggers with fools. Sorry, don't seem to be able to sifn with this phone thingn but c'est moi.

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

649,175,937

` :The promo for this essay on the author's page links to Game of Thrones, the TV series. Perhaps this info should be added to the ``Reception`` secton of that page. `

2,015

false

article

random

test

false

649,184,807

` == Your correction == Dear Bichonen: Your correction of the word hamlet is most appreciated but there was absolutely no need to add a snide edit summary ``please stop insisting on ``Hamlet``, 122.xx``. I was not insisting on hamlet. It was the first time I edit the word. I just assumed from seeing it with a capital H on Long Island that it was part of the town name and I probably was correct. In any case, you clarified your correction and I will not undo your edit. , on the other hand, just undid my entire copy-edit not just the word hamlet and didn't bother to clarify why he did it which was a shitty thing to do. I had other copy-edits that were correct yet he just undid them all without regard to my input or my feelings. `

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

649,194,900

== Bullshit == What the fuck are you annoying my edits on Wikipedia? Such a bullshit you're bitch! Wikipedia is free to everyone for edit asshole!! (anonymous) 06:30 28 February 2015 (UTC)

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

true

649,200,387

I promise I will not attack or make uncontributive edits anymore

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

649,203,152

` :: The reviewing editor delisted article and made it C-class, while before previous GA-review it was B-class. Even if all closely paraphrased text had been fixed, he would have not known it, since the editor didn't bother to find all the closely paraphrased text. ::The talk page is overloaded with old threads and when some pro-Russian readers (who are angry that the article is written from an academic POV, rather than Russian government's POV), read there titles like ``Changes by UA Victory``, some openly harass me there or majority of them badmouth me outside Wikipedia. Should not old replies by automatically archived? `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

649,214,192

` Why have you changed the image again? The text is now all but unreadable. It is now forced into single-word lines, extending down past the reference section. ,It looks ridiculous. You quoted IMGSIZE, yet again, in the summary. That policy states: In general, do not use px without very good reason What that means is, the policy needs not to be unilaterally enforced at all costs. If, as in this instance, there is a need for a change in size, it is permissible. The policy further states: Where px is used, the resulting image should be no more than 500 pixels tall and no more than 400 pixels wide, for comfortable display on the smallest devices in common use. I have already (and repeatedly) demonstrated that upsizing to 250px is all that required. (I bet even 220px would work). That is well within the limits. The change to the picture itself is negligible, and therefore does not impact the article negatively in any way. It only servers to benefit the article by making the text within the caption more wieldy and easier to read. It also eliminates the impact of needlessly extending the picture frame all the way down to the refs. Surely you can see this. Since you're quoting this policy so much, surely you know that it does not prohibit this edit. I have asked repeatedly that you look at the effect on the article, both before and after the edit, and in doing so,. surely you see the need for this edit. Yet you insist on repeatedly reverting, which only serves a detriment to the article and is tantamount to vandalism. Is that really want you want for this article? - '''' `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

649,215,972

` ::Yup... not everyone using WP knows to change their preferences. And what about the casul users? What about people without accounts? You say I'm ``trying to force this on everyone`` as if I'm doing something harmful. It's just the opposite. My edit only served to benefit the article. It is you that is needlessly forcing everyone to jump through your hoops, and all based on what? A policy that doesn't even apply? Or a need to control the content on this page. You made an unecessary revert, and instead of admitting you were wrong, and just letting the edit stand, you are trying to needlessly argue the point. - '''' `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

649,216,129

(mine was preset at 120px, by the way)

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

649,218,389

Brutal force is your ultimate argument. Keep perverting.

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

649,261,947

: Not done: as you are WP:SHOUTING and you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. -

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

649,263,952

` :. In a fair project, what you said would be completely true. But, the project stinks of Bishonen's rancid smell. As I said in my valid and now removed comment, Bishonen's few asses always rush to cover up her shit, like Dr. Michel just did. He removed my comment and blocked me from making more comments. So, do you really want me to allow Bishonen, Drmies et al to do the same to my regular admin account knowing what they get away with on here? No, I don't think so. There are billions of IP's for us to throw away and make our points. I only have one account here. By the way, many editors are now using throw away IP's. The project's culture not them is to blame. `

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

649,274,027

` == Not Good for Straight Forward Understanding of Advances == Without clear categorization of advances tracked through time, how can one get any meaning out of the article? For example, tracking the maximum number of quantum bits in a single entanglement according to date would be much more meaningful than the current listing of ad hoc, haphazard, and arbitrary ``achievements``. Also comparing the number of quantum bits needed for various types of tasks such as breaking encryption would be very informative in comparison to current accomplishments, because it would expose how little progress we have really made. A great example of this would be to show how many quantum bits the D-Wave machines achieve in individual entanglements. This would expose the misguided impressions generated when D-Wave talks about the number of quantum bits on a single board as that has almost nothing to do with the number of quantum bits achieved in a individual entanglements. `

2,015

false

article

random

test

false

649,294,296

` :Correction, you're not even an admin, you're just an idiot it seems. '''''' `

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

true

649,340,372

:Thanks for the fix! Everyone's everything needs more coffee always That's one of the laws of the universe I think.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

649,343,679

` ==Sockpuppet investigation== `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

649,358,130

Jam Sebastian]]March 1 2015]== Shawarma32 Wow, you really want this person die in advance. Please stop giving death dates to a living person. You were too offensive. ==[[

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

649,377,897

` ::::what you've done makes sense to me, its probably not controversial even if its wrong, I already found something in the press last week about Northern Fury round 1 matchup against a qualifier, whereas this article has this as a Round 5 matchup. :::::Looking forward to the next NNSW draw on Google, to see if their draw organiser has any more success groping the boobs of the gal holding the box with the names in it. LOL. I'm hoping that next year we'll see draws each round at simialr times - none of the pre-ordained-draw-112-balls-at-once NSW shit. ``OOhhh, winner round 5 ball 98 has drawn winner round 5 ball 103`` four months before we know what the teams are. FAR more exciting to make the draw when the teams are known.`

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

649,429,224

` == Collapsing of My Questions and Not a Reply to Them == You collapsed some of my comments, but left TVH's reply to them, addressing me, outside the collapse. That was very confusing, because TVH appeared to be replying to something that I didn't say. You want to start to get statements of agreement. So do I. But I can't start agreeing unless I know what I am being asked to agree with. If I feel that I am being pushed to start agreeing with things while having to unhide things to see what the agreement is, I won't be able to agree. I don't think that I am being that difficult; I just want to know what issues are the blocking issues. If I shouldn't ask what is being said to be horrible, then why not hide the ``horrible`` comment rather than my puzzlement about it? If you were clumsy in deciding what to collapse, then I understand. But if you think that I shouldn't be asking questions about harsh statements, then maybe either the harsh statements should be collapsed or maybe I would prefer to see a more active style of moderation. Maybe I don't understand. `

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

649,452,071

To the contrary, if you read my intent. However, there is still the matter of the graph made from census bureau data sourced from healthsentinel with permission that expands the existing graph from the CDC. Also, there is the matter of the peer reviewed, academic journal article from Sage Publications by Dr. Miller showing the correlation of infant mortality rates and vaccination schedules. I would like to include this since this page is about the controversy and not the vaccines themselves. This article explains the want of people for further testing on the safety of so many vaccines in a short period of time.

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

649,456,132

Template talk:Prussian princes You successfully defended his ignorance. Who are you to make such judgments? And who are you to judge others? Maybe you want to rewrite history? You successfully defended his ignorance. You remove the part of the article - this is vandalism.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

649,456,890

== Template talk:Prussian princes == You successfully defended his ignorance. Who are you to make such judgments? And who are you to judge others? Maybe you want to rewrite history? You successfully defended his ignorance. You remove the part of the article - this is vandalism.

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

true

649,464,565

be honest and tell me

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

649,465,971

== Iowa 370 == Why did you move Iowa Highway 370 to County Road H10? I have some reservations about the title, but I'd like to hear your reasons why. –

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

649,487,830

` == lol == ``Added to this is the influence of futuristic and fictional themes[7] relevant to life in American late capitalist society, with Alvin Toffler's book The Third Wave being a notable point of reference.[8][9]`` <-Seriously? I think my IQ dropped 10 points just after reading this.`

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

649,489,178

` == Did AIPAC write this? == It's a bullshit propaganda piece full of irrelevant shit inserted to inflame opinion against the Palestinians. We know it was an attack against civilians, do we really need to know a father was killed with his daughter? In an encyclopedia article? And a subsection called ``Palestinian glorification of the attack``? Fucking seriously? Wikipedia is a joke when it comes to these topics. Whoever has more people editing the page gets to decide the truth. What a joke.`

2,015

false

article

blocked

test

true

649,489,562

::::::::::His argument seems sound to me and the comparison valid. Sincerely, anyone.

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

649,496,116

WebStorm is notable. I don't understand why it is claimed that WebStorm is not notable. It is a popular software app, and I've heard several people mention it on online forums. A Google Search yields 572,000 results.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

649,516,774

` == R1b1c == The R1b1c in Sardinia is M18 a clade that is absent in all sub-Saharan and other African populations; It was only detected in Lebanon, Sardinia and Corsica; Its ancestral clade is V88 and V88 clades are most common in sub-saharn Africa but R1b-V88 itself is not sub-saharan due to its ancestor P25 (ancestor of both V88 and M269) is not sub-Saharan African but from the Eastern Eurasia where in turn its ultimate ancestor M207 (R1b/R1a) derives from; Thus before R1b (P25/V88) entered sub-Sahran Africa (from Eurasia/NearEast) it must have split into subclade M18 and moved along the Mediterranean as for the distribution of V88 clades in sub-Sahran Africa {Cruciani et al 2010}: ``In summary, our data indicate a significant male contribution from northern Africa (and ultimately Asia) to the gene pool of the central Sahel. The trans-Saharan population movements resulting in this genetic pattern would seem to mirror the spread of the proto-Chadic languages, and most likely took place during the early mid Holocene, a period when giant paleolakes may have provided a corridor for human migrations across what is now the Sahara desert.``Cruciani et al 2010: http://www.nature.com/ejhg/journal/v18/n7/full/ejhg2009231a.html note the complete absence of M18 in Africa (Table1.) `

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

649,517,808

:: In response; But Boattini 2013 did and he equally found R1b1c to be only M18 (2.4% / 82 smaples); The images you have are not representing the specified subclades tested (or they were not tested) as also by R1b1a2 (M269); Some bloggers and forum users (Mr. Rocca) have more details from the Fraccalacci et al 2014 study and deceiphered for example (R1b-U152) frequency; Try to find these specific tables;

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

649,520,252

::: In response; No exactly not; The V88 clades in the sub-Saharan Chadic speaking Areas came (directly) from North Africa (ultimately) from Eurasia (P25 being the ancestral clade); M18 which is a clade of V88

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

649,521,622

` == This pool page == 1- I did not make any edits whatsoever on the President of the USA page for Wikipedia. There may be additional individuals logging in under this User Talk address. 2- I did not attack what's its name (SynchroCat?!!!) but it seems from the response that some editors at Wikipedia have a f- raging disease of attacking anyone outside the pool of Wikipedia editors that may question their judgement. You need to read the log before you label my comments ``attack``. For the record I dont think you are a f-gg-t either.`

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

true

649,521,895

` == Your FYI about ``my`` edits == Did not make any edits whatsoever on the Vice President of the USA page for Wikipedia. There may be additional individuals logging in under this User Talk address.`

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

649,522,098

` == The attack? == I did not attack what's its name (SynchroCat?!!!) but it seems from the response that some editors at Wikipedia have a f- raging disease of attacking anyone outside the pool of Wikipedia editors that may question their judgement. You need to read the log before you label my comments ``attack``. For the record I dont think you are a f-gg-t either.`

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

649,522,360

` == The attack? == I did not attack what's its name (SynchroCat?!!!) but it seems from the response that some editors at Wikipedia have a f- raging disease of attacking anyone outside the pool of Wikipedia editors that may question their judgement. You need to read the log before you label my comments ``attack``. For the record I dont think you are a f-gg-t either. So you dont know how to read? You just know how to use the delete button? How delightful for your supervisors.`

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

true

649,523,010

== Your Type-Os == You didnt like my comments on your type? Dont be a cry baby, ok? You breakin mah hard hat.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

true

649,523,373

:::: In response; I can only advise and refer to the Cruciani et al 2010 study - link and quote in my first post; Again, M18 (V88from Northern Africa< (Cruciani et al 2010) and ultimately stems from Eurasia (as all other R1b clades) via P25

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

649,525,178

I removed nothing. I replaced what you removed. What are you playing at?

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

649,527,327

Mr. Miller's paper is a secondary source, peer-reviewed journal article from a reputable publisher. This article has been further cited by other peer reviewed papers. The primary source for this article are the mortality reports from each country's mortality reports. The correlation explains people's attitudes and concerns. This is not an article on vaccine safety, it is on the controversy. This article clearly gives a basis for the controversy.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

649,528,694

::::AndyTheGrump either you are referring to the graph, or you are simply wrong about Mr. Miller's paper. Primary source-raw data; secondary source-Mr. Miller's paper; tertiary source-WP citing the paper.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

649,531,540

:::::So you are restating, and begging me to accuse you of hacking? Really, and you say I'm wasting your time?

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

649,531,699

::::::Very descriptive, NOT. Not, helpful...Since the point is proven that the paper is a secondary source from a reputable publisher thus meets guidelines, are there any new objections?

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

649,532,848

As I said before, there appears to have been a bot glitch. I understand and am familiar with bots. I'm guessing it happened because many were editing at the same time? I don't know, but I didn't purposefully delete anything. Jytog, I understand vaccine controversy, biology, medicine, child rearing, and many other things very well. I may be a new user, and my thoughts are just as valid as yours. After I had edited all I saw was AndyTheGrump having deleted what I had just written along with many other things. Upon further inspection I saw the bot. That does not change that AndyTheGrump deleted my comments throwing the baby out with the bathwater. All I did was save mine to get intertwined in the glitch.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

649,535,888

==Good news== i would replace the shit that is the real EvergreenFir, to transform Wikipedia into a vandalism, muahahaha.....

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

649,536,686

I would appreciate that, Jytdog. Here's a question to ponder, however. I saved my edit and in the process caused a glitch and a controversy. An experienced user undid what had been done wholesale, including my new edit, without looking to see the connection to the bot. I'm not leaving. I'm not ashamed of being a noob. You were a noob once and made mistakes. It happens. Though the condescension in you help is truly not helpful. Noobs look like noobs no matter the format. Condescending people, mean people, and hot heads who jump to conslusions make asses of themselves in any format. ==Making Vaccine Controversy Whole Again== It appears we have been affected by a bot glitch of some sort. At any rate, one of my comments has been lost in the space-time continuum. Other's comments have been deleted. Jytdog, TenOfAllTrades, and TheRedPenofDoom are you all whole again?

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

649,537,688

:Fuck you The Anome, Porn for you.

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

true

649,540,465

::::::::::I have read it, and I continue to see that Mr. Miller's is in compliance. Please stop placing the link and place the quote that states this peer reviewed, academic journal article from a reputable publishing house does not comply with standards. AndyTheGrump, you just made my point. Thank you. Miller used primary, Miller's work itself is secondary. There are other peer reviewed, academic journal articles that cite Miller's, would you prefer those also?

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

649,550,087

== Rhine Campaign of 1796 == Hi, Battle of Kehl failed at FA because there were no responses other than an image review. I'll resub in a week or two. What do you think about getting this entire series ready for A class and up? We can organize this, I'm sure.

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

649,551,578

` == Yoshendi == Hello! I acknowledge why you have deleted my page ``Yoshendi``, but it is still my personal belief that Yoshendi balls so hard, he is significant enough to be entitled to one article on Wikipedia. No matter how much we disagree, we can both agree on the fact that he does ball fairly hard. Thanks for your time. Suck a dick, Deb, Yoshendi`

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

649,565,424

== I have learned your secret pastime ==

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

649,576,758

*If you don't mind a bit of advice, what more details or info should I be including in the articles to get them up to GA status? Always willing to listen to good info.

2,015

true

user

random

test

false