dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
672,998,329	` : This is not a translation of the Greek article. I was looking for good-quality articles in foreign languages that we're missing from en.wiki, and I did read the Greek article, but I did not translate any part of it. I was negligibly inspired by the Greek article. It is impossible for the ``majority of the article to have original content``, since they both cover the same bleeding topic. What would you like me to do, pretend that it lies in the Adriatic Sea? `	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
673,025,072	:Support merge. Summary tables are more efficient.	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
673,028,698	` ::Going through your edit history, it would appear that you do absolutely nothing other than propose random articles for deletion. I regret to inform you that this one won't be deleted, as it's plainly notable. The fact that you've never heard of it does not qualify it for deletion. A quick Google search could have told you that the film was notable. Next time, perhaps you should actually do some research about the subjects of articles before trying to have the articles deleted because ``I've never heard of it, so it's clearly not notable``. Regardless, I have expanded the article to include some more sources. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
673,046,275	. Note that like all else this is owned by the Bucksham Co-operative	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
673,052,580	* Support per the eminently sensible, long-standing consensus that languages which share their name with a peoples or country - or anything else of significance - should be naturally disambiguated. We don't make the titles of articles ambiguous simply because they cover the primary topic.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
673,056,484	::: I don't see why it might be far too soon, or why Kwami's behaviour might call for shutting the RM.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
673,084,318	:: That's not a personal attack or really anything other that calling him what he is. I'll stop not because of any other reasons then some Hasbara den mother like Jayjjg or whatever his name is trying to have me barred as a result.	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
673,087,172	` :::: Oh I thought you were referring to what I said about his ``contributions``. All right, then. :::: `	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
673,150,550	I really don't know what you mean on my talk page. I added citations to two articles in medical journals. It would be more helpful if you gave direct info as to what is wrong rather than a generic cut and paste regarding recommended practice.	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
673,150,620	Unclear on what you are referring to	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
673,155,558	` :::When writing about a future SCHEDULED event, such as this year's Canadian Election, one has to make the assumption that everything will go as normal. It has to be assumed that there will NOT be a declaration of war or a zombie invasion or a terrorist attack that would upend the system. If there is a consensus in the ``real world`` that something must happen by a certain date, then Wikipedia must reflect that. The Democratic National committee is within it's rights to cancel next year's convention and declare Hillary to be the nominee if it wants. Will it? NO!!!!!! The disruption that a gratuitous repeal of the fixed election act by Parliament months or weeks before a scheduled dissolution would have been enormous. There is a reasonableness test that must be applied, and barring the zombies, delaying the election into 2016 or later fails. `	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
673,159,895	== Arrogant user torin == You should return money you steal.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	true
673,164,972	:No, correction: it only speaks about the present-day community, not about origins.	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
673,178,409	== 26 July 17:03 UTC eh? == There once was a 'pedian from doylestownNaN But it was easy to enquire When s-protection would expire And quietly begin a count down RELEASED UNDER DA CREATIVE COMMONS SHARE ALIKE LICENCE BY UHHHHH INDUSTRIES ===Anyway=== I can once again make it EXTREMELY clear that I am not a massive fan of da graceful slick nor his aiders or abettors.	2,015	false	user	blocked	dev	false
673,178,618	== 26 July 17:03 UTC eh? == There once was a 'pedian from doylestownNaN But it was easy to enquire When s-protection would expire And quietly begin a count down RELEASED UNDER DA CREATIVE COMMONS SHARE ALIKE LICENCE BY UHHHHH INDUSTRIES ===Anyway=== I can once again make it EXTREMELY clear that I am not a massive fan of da graceful slick nor his aiders or abettors.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
673,179,037	== 26 July 17:03 UTC eh? == There once was a 'pedian from doylestownNaN But it was easy to enquire When s-protection would expire And quietly begin a count down RELEASED UNDER DA CREATIVE COMMONS SHARE ALIKE LICENCE BY UHHHHH INDUSTRIES ===Anyway=== I can once again make it EXTREMELY clear that I am not a massive fan of da graceful slick nor his aiders or abettors.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
673,179,101	== 26 July 17:03 UTC eh? == There once was a 'pedian from doylestownNaN But it was easy to enquire When s-protection would expire And quietly begin a count down RELEASED UNDER DA CREATIVE COMMONS SHARE ALIKE LICENCE BY UHHHHH INDUSTRIES ===Anyway=== I can once again make it EXTREMELY clear that I am not a massive fan of da graceful slick nor his aiders or abettors.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
673,203,018	: Same thing, no difference. Fée is the Old French spelling, while Fay is the middle/modern English spelling (the word was borrowed from Old French, mind you).	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
673,213,788	` ::: Gone again, bud. NYT was maybe the one really objective source and that mentioned the use of the takbir in passing, without trying to make any grandiose claims or sensationalism out of it. We both know that PFLP affiliates are really the furthest thing from conservative Islamists or ``jihadists``, so the fact of the matter is that the link to the ``takbir in jihadism`` subsection is intentionally misleading. ::: `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
673,213,936	==Islamic terrorism== ER, Hamas is the Muslim Brotherhood, if the Muslim Brotherhood isn't Islamist, what is?	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
673,214,699	: The issue, Gregory, is the fact that your edits are all about trying to make the insinuation that Hamas is connected to, or working with ISIS, and that these attacks are tied to the ISIS Ramadan attacks at the end of June. : This is blatant falsehood, not least because Hamas and ISIS are enemies and actively in a state of open confrontation as far as the Gaza Strip is concerned. : Hamas is Nationalist-Islamist. ISIS is Salafi Jihadi/Wahhabi-Takfiri. There's a big big difference to anyone who actually cares to pay attention/not actively mislead people. ::	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
673,215,128	` ==Changed another link== I changed ``Islamic terrorist incidents in the 2010s`` to ``Israeli settlements`` considering the former is all about listing the work of Al Qaeda and other international Jihadi movements, and as a result, the latter is considerably more relevant in the case of this shooting. : `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
673,236,594	` ::And the Club de Fútbol de Oporto seem to be becoming a base for a Spanish annexation of Portugal. Well, it's five days until I go to my first ``game`` of this season, a friendly an hour and a half up the road against a team I already travelled to last season, and not the most attractive place on Earth either. Still, I couldn't turn down the offer from a friend to go. On an unrelated note, you may have noticed I'm no longer semi-retired. I had reached the epiphany that university was just a faceless moneymaking scheme keeping me off unemployment statistics for four years (I learnt absolutely nothing and still passed the first year, talk about ``higher education``, gimmee the fucking diploma now and get this charade over with) but it seems I can't do anything worthwhile without it. It's back to the madhouse I go this September. It's a ridiculous amount of money I pay for about three hours ``teaching`` per day (spread across the day so I can't do anything else with my time), and everybody else fills their offtime with drugs...while I edit here. Meh `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
673,246,617	` :::Yeah, so I add two interesting and important new, relevant references to an article which indicates potential harm to pregnant women on the Paracetamol page. These are removed because you guys don't like primary sources? This is ridiculous and frankly an extreme case of what is wrong with Wikipedia. My wife is pregnant. I for sure want to know about potential harm of this drug. I would think as a medical professional that you would be more inspired by the ``first do no harm`` idea. The fact that you Wikipedia jerks are so focused on having only sources from a narrow range of whatever it takes for a given article is so frustrating. I've continued to run into this kind of thing. You would think that academic journals have taken over Wikipedia. The idea that I have actually improved the article with my additions, and that others can improve it further, has completely escaped much of the Wikipedia culture these days. Wikipedia has simply forgotten the idea that this is collaboratively edited, rather than having a coterie of people who simply reject all edits if they do not thread the eye of the needle through the dozens of acronym style guides. You guys are disgusting, really. You are standing on the shoulders of millions of edits and now you reject the very thing that got you to where you are, namely lots of collaboratively edited small improvements. Now any change has to go through hurdles that would never have created Wikipedia in the first place. The fact that you have excluded something that is evidence of significant danger to pregnant women based on this culture of exclusiveness should trouble you deeply. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
673,246,952	` == Hyperactivity and Neural Development - Censorship == Two recent studies indicate problems in hyperactivity and neural development of children. :Yeah, so I add two interesting and important new, relevant references to an article which indicates potential harm to pregnant women on the Paracetamol page. These are removed because you guys don't like primary sources? This is ridiculous and frankly an extreme case of what is wrong with Wikipedia. My wife is pregnant. I for sure want to know about potential harm of this drug. I would think as a medical professional that you would be more inspired by the ``first do no harm`` idea. The fact that you Wikipedia jerks are so focused on having only sources from a narrow range of whatever it takes for a given article is so frustrating. I've continued to run into this kind of thing. You would think that academic journals have taken over Wikipedia. The idea that I have actually improved the article with my additions, and that others can improve it further, has completely escaped much of the Wikipedia culture these days. Wikipedia has simply forgotten the idea that this is collaboratively edited, rather than having a coterie of people who simply reject all edits if they do not thread the eye of the needle through the dozens of acronym style guides. You guys are disgusting, really. You are standing on the shoulders of millions of edits and now you reject the very thing that got you to where you are, namely lots of collaboratively edited small improvements. Now any change has to go through hurdles that would never have created Wikipedia in the first place. The fact that you have excluded something that is evidence of significant danger to pregnant women based on this culture of exclusiveness should trouble you deeply. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
673,248,003	== ANI == You have left me with no choice.	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
673,279,149	Two out of three of your sources are rubbish and, I think, show you up for what you are. There's a lot of claptrap coming from Israel over Hamas being one and the same with ISIS, and then you have Sisi simply not liking them because of their connection to the deposed Muslim Brotherhood government in Egypt. :::: Hamas is Islamist-Nationalist (and so the Wahhabis of ISIS see them as heretical) and there's not really any evidence to the claims of Hamas and ISIS colluding in the Sinai. It's by and large Israeli nonsense of the kind they've been rattling off since AQ became such a hot issue. ::::	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
673,287,455	REDIRECT Talk:Islamic Consultative Assembly	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
673,291,957	:: This isn't about my feelings, it is about your behavior. You revert me with no reason, then start quoting this bureaucratic nonsense, then threaten me with banning due to my disruptive editing. This is why Wikipedia is dying, cannibalizing its editors and edits in a Kafkaesque farce. Congratulations, I'm sure your no-doubt proper and uplifting ZYZZYXRD will be cited upon its demise. You may want to try and comprehend your own actions, and not my feelings. See .	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
673,292,141	` == Disruptive Activity == Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Paracetamol, you may be blocked from editing. (email) :Yeah, so I add two interesting and important new, relevant references to an article which indicates potential harm to pregnant women on the Paracetamol page. These are removed because you guys don't like primary sources? This is ridiculous and frankly an extreme case of what is wrong with Wikipedia. My wife is pregnant. I for sure want to know about potential harm of this drug. I would think as a medical professional that you would be more inspired by the ``first do no harm`` idea. The fact that you Wikipedia jerks are so focused on having only sources from a narrow range of whatever it takes for a given article is so frustrating. I've continued to run into this kind of thing. You would think that academic journals have taken over Wikipedia. The idea that I have actually improved the article with my additions, and that others can improve it further, has completely escaped much of the Wikipedia culture these days. Wikipedia has simply forgotten the idea that this is collaboratively edited, rather than having a coterie of people who simply reject all edits if they do not thread the eye of the needle through the dozens of acronym style guides. You guys are disgusting, really. You are standing on the shoulders of millions of edits and now you reject the very thing that got you to where you are, namely lots of collaboratively edited small improvements. Now any change has to go through hurdles that would never have created Wikipedia in the first place. The fact that you have excluded something that is evidence of significant danger to pregnant women based on this culture of exclusiveness should trouble you deeply. :: I'm sorry that I've upset you, but the fact is we get hundreds upon hundreds of poor quality changes every day. That is why we've written WP:MEDRS which I pointed to when I reverted you. There is also an excellent essay on why we adhere so strongly to it at WP:WHYMEDRS. The fact is that many primary studies are either performed on mice or on very small populations so that their results can't be transferred into clinical practise. MEDRS is no catch all, but it helps us and makes patrolling many articles and removing citations from the daily mail easier. I would also like to point out that we are working on getting these types of warnings into our articles automatically, for example by having FDA warnings automatically added. ::I understand it may feel as if you're being reverted by a faceless mass, but I assure you if you had simply taken up the discussion it would have been far more likely to be productive. (email) ::: This isn't about my feelings, it is about your behavior. You revert me with no reason, then start quoting this bureaucratic nonsense, then threaten me with banning due to my disruptive editing. This is why Wikipedia is dying, cannibalizing its editors and edits in a Kafkaesque farce. Congratulations, I'm sure your no-doubt proper and uplifting ZYZZYXRD will be cited upon its demise. You may want to try and comprehend your own actions, and not my feelings. See . `	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
673,292,577	These were both large studies not having anything to do with mice. These rules are not useful, and essay reading should not be a requirement for submitting actual value to the article. Again, how would Wikipedia even exist if this kind of hurdle was required to get it started? This behavior is not sustainable. Eventually the remaining admins will actually reach the end of their productive lives and then what, Wikipedia will live on as a set of revert bots? Most likely.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
673,348,183	:pure bullshit.	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	true
673,357,756	` ==Capitalisation== MOS:INSTITUTIONS says: :``Generic words for institutions (university, college, hospital, high school) do not take capitals: ::Incorrect (generic): The University offers programs in arts and sciences. ::Correct (generic): The university offers programs in arts and sciences. ::Correct (title): The University of Delhi offers programs in arts and sciences.`` So in this article, ``society`` should be capitalised in ``the Fakenham and Dereham Railway Society``, and not capitalised when written as ``the society``, and ``the Mid-Norfolk Railway Preservation Trust``, but ``the trust``. This is Wikipedia style. is insisting on capitalising these words on the basis that ``This article is written in British English, not Wikipedlish.`` It is not clear that there is a standard British style for this. Take, for example, the University of Oxford Style Guide. Page 4 states: ``Capitalise only when used as part of the title of a department, not when referring to a department without using its full name`` and provides this example: ``The Department for Work and Pensions has to make significant cuts this year, as do many government departments.`` The guide says pretty much the same thing with reference to colleges, faculties, divisions, and fellows. There will be other style guides, of course, but I think this demonstrates that there is no one British style that should supersede Wikipedia style in this article. \| `	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
673,361,689	` == You Are an Awesome wikipedian == {\| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` \|rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` \| \|style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` \| Some shit \|- \|style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` \| Some droppings of filthy muck mess to feel you better. Don't bother myself \|}`	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
673,429,139	== Changes revered.. May I know why? == Hello, Some of the changes that I did recently on the pages were reverted by you even though I had given reference. May I know what is considered as trivial? I am not expert in Wikipedia editing, so please explain.	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
673,433,209	` == Congratulation & my appreciation for your Efforts to create the list of Notable Blogs== This is a great effort by the Author of the `` List of Blogs `` who create the list of notable blogs. However the guideline of notability is still - not as per wikipedia policy - I severally suffered from this and the great thing is that you can not contest the deletion n if you try to do that there are several other come in a minutes. Now notability is the subject of some admins self created mind made policy, which they apply any where to delete put notices, reverting or do any thing which they want. The list of creating notable blogs are really a good efforts and I request all admins let this page be on wikipedia & co-operate with this author with positive mind so the people can take good references and create knowledgeable , fair articles with the help of sources. priyadarshivishal23`	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
673,433,571	Authors who did efforts	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
673,446,009	Your user page indicates you're a left-wing liberalist bastard! Why is in Wikipedia so much left-wing scum?!	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
673,472,504	== x factor == Excuse me but why are you removing my content on x factor ? You have no right !	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
673,473,602	` == Which Former Employers? == ``After the war she wrote a revealing memoir describing her former employers as gangsters.`` I don't think it's clear whether this is the Germans, the British, or the French. `	2,015	false	article	random	train	false
673,473,683	` *Oppose due to ambiguity, per Sawol. Noted earlier comments re: ``clear commonname argument for Kia pointing here``, ``no other significant use for 'Kia, but I'm not sure it is that clear, and a case could be made that should be the dab page. – `	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
673,497,479	` Hi Red - When you get a chance, take a look at the Charles E. Bassett article. I've addressed just about all of the suggestions that you have made - at least up to this point. It may require further tweaking, here and there, but I think you'll find my latest version very much closer to what you hand in mind. While I have your attention I had an idea that you might be able to assist with - since your technical chops are undoubtedly better than mine. In short - Is it possible to move the ``Dodge City Peace Commission`` photo from its current location, blow it up to a larger size, and place that enlarged photo so that it is placed in what is currently a large blank space next to the Table of Contents? I think it would make a far more attractive page. I probably should mention that, prior to turning to writing full-time, I worked for several years as a corporate art director - who specialized in page layouts. Let me know what you think about the idea. Also let me know if there are any remaining issues with the Bassett article that you think should be addressed. I'm sure we can work together. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
673,510,178	, this could lead to a conflict of interest	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
673,539,375	` ::I haven't the slightest idea of what you talking about. But you probably need to screw myself. What is narcissist? English is not my native language so I prefer not to condemn your vain. Although you were pointing out a harassment against BBS or LTTE disciple. I don't care any conservative rubbish, and I'm not an aspirant like yourself. I merely concern politics in Sri lanka on a scholarly platform; not in arrogant or vulgar nature. But hypocrites criticize some ethical issues without any basis regarding our customs in Sri Lanka. I don't know why you keen to bother my self on my page savagely. So literal you scream behalf of your self and that doesn't give me any sense. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
673,544,595	:::: Which sentences have been lifted from the Greek article?	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
673,547,355	:: Since these wrestling article pages took their current form about 7 years ago, one of the rules has always been that if a wrestler holds a championship, he automatically gets included as part of the roster. PJ Black won the King of the Mountain Championship at last night's Impact Wrestling tapings, thus he automatically gets included on the roster. The note at the top of the page is to let everybody know that TNA and GFW have a talent exchange agreement, so they don't have to include every GFW guy that makes an appearance on Impact Wrestling. Black (KOTM Champion) and Jarrett (general manager) get special mentions due to their specific roles...PJB has a title, and JJ is the authority figure. Once PJB loses his title, he'll be removed, as will Jarrett once he loses his authority figure role. Vjmlhds	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
673,548,439	Possible sources for adding Asexuality as a topic http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2008/sep/08/relationships.healthandwellbeing http://www.asexuality.org/en/topic/98479-happiness-and-asexual/ https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/living-single/200912/asexuals-who-are-they-and-why-are-they-important	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
673,553,482	== This idiot == How can you possibly know what I OWN and Don't OWN? Obviously NOT because YOU seem to think that you are God's seeing eye and can see what I own. Pathetic that a lonely virgin Canadian has the balls to say what I OWN and Don't OWN. I will be taking this matter through the proper channels to get you removed from your wreckless position. Have fun playing god and thinking you know what people own. P.s. I do OWN all of those pictures bitch .	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	true
673,554,264	== I have been flagged == Anothwr editor which I have attacked has accused me of theft. Also of copyright infringement, and pretending to know what I OWN.	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
673,559,222	` :::I'll add that a major problem with the term 'North American football' is that really only means 'American and Canadian football'. Even if you use the most narrow definition of 'North American' (US, Canada, and Mexico), 'football' means something different in Mexico. `	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
673,575,820	:::You are not waiting for others. You have clearly demonstrated on your tedious editing that you do not want this particular thing being shown about your temple. You have to wait for a proper consensus to be reached and have others input. I will reach out to other admins for help. You are offically edit warring at this point and it is not okay. I have provided over a dozen citations so knock it off.	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
673,586,921	Dear Human3015 == You are making unnecessary issue all the Text and Judgement are related to the Hind Marriage Act. I am not able to understand why you want to distroy my contribution. What is the exact issue. First you told that blogs are not the reliable sources. Then I added the more reliable source e.g the official website , Books and Publishers. When I added the reliable sources , You put other unnesessary objection. Though I explained you the reason the Case Law , the Law must be in a form that it was delivered. One must not play with case law with their own words & interpret it if this will happen the reliability of the Law will be lost. All edits done by me are as per wikipedia policy e.g reliability , Neutrality , Varifiability. But you are deleting the edits. Rast is up to you. My Regards. priyadarshivishal23 ==	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
673,587,051	Now you are telling that It is not related to Hindu Marriage Act. However it is purely related to Hindu Marriage Act.	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
673,607,688	::I can see three copies of that advice on your talk page in the boxed items at the right hand side.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
673,609,814	REDIRECT Talk:Count On Me (Whitney Houston and CeCe Winans song)	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
673,630,794	== Right Sector == Right Sector is involved in the current conflict occurring in the Donbass region. I am now aware you have a biasness for your lack of justification in removing material which is well known. Because you seem to think it's fine to remove the Right Sector from the info-box, I will remove the RNU , as I can see no fairer way then to remove a Russian-centric group while you unjustifiably removed a Ukrainian-centric group, and labeled the addition of them as not 'constructive'. There is a better case to be made for Right Sector involvement in the conflict rather than RNU involvement.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
673,643,796	REDIRECT Talk:UFC Fight Night: Poirier vs. Duffy	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
673,649,729	REDIRECT Talk:The Dick & Paula Celebrity Special	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
673,651,621	` *Alternate #2 to Metro Center (WMATA station). The ``Washington Metro`` suffix is for the lines, rather than the stations. - `	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
673,653,031	== Question about feminism == Hi, Do you prefer running outside with your top on or with your boobs hanging out like Chelsea Handler? Thanks, Max	2,015	false	user	blocked	dev	false
673,655,862	` : Looking at Category:WikiProject Washington Metro articles, there appear to be more articles that use the suffix ``(Washington Metro)`` than there are ``(WMATA station)``. I did see one or two ``(Washington Metrorail)``. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
673,658,827	== The 1947 ISO Standardisation == More information is needed on the standardisation that ISO did in 1947. For example, there were separate French, German, and Japanese screw threads of the common designations, and the Swiss had a set for the tiny screws used in watchmaking.	2,015	false	article	random	train	false
673,658,935	` :::::I have several issues with it, that's why I think it's worth discussing. First, there is no clear consensus of the meaning of the genre, and since there is no current consensus of what makes a film an epic film, it shouldn't be used in the lead as it will not help a user understand the film. My other issue is with the category ``science fiction war film``, which has no source or mention in the article. Can you show me how it should fit with this article? Preferably with some sort of source, or at least a definition of the genre that shows that Star Wars fits in. I'll try to dig up the 2001 discussion. I hope I've made myself a bit more clear now. `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
673,662,231	`::: Don't be dense ... WP:USSTATION clearly states that ``... where the word ``Station`` is part of the proper name, it should be capitalized, which is the case here. Regardless of that, the pertinent point is that the renaming is to avoid a disambig page. Please stay focused on the key issue. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
673,667,762	::::: - Just read the sign! -	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
673,683,012	Fuck off Dicksternet you dickhead.	2,015	false	user	blocked	test	true
673,698,645	` Rpo.castro ... you're just another Kante4's alias ... there's no other vandalism besides yours, khm ``Kante4``, nazi attitude ... You always try to divert any contribution that you dislike (Why?) to vandalism when you're wrong. Just last time you talked about ````DIFFERENT TOURNAMET SCHEME````. It's not like every tournament, that's held every two years or so, changes their competition structure. I'm wondering how didn't you say they abolished that funny named ``presidents cup`` which is nothing else fancy name for group losers placement playoffs. And when you lack any reason then you push your nazi button and call others vandals. Stop using other accounts to add nothing constructive in article where you obviously didnt contribute ... just removing some clearing tables. As even i wont remember in the middle of the night why and where these nationakl teams were placed trhat way against each other. few words notification like ``1-4 placement`` ``play against each other`` you so sold as explanation actually lacks any evidence explanation for someone just try to casually read article after few months.`	2,015	false	user	blocked	dev	true
673,699,163	` That fellow Editor uses few aliases like rpo.castro when he dislikes others contributuons. Also uses confusion by inducing ``changing of tournament sceme`` every once in a while ... very often. And thas all he contributes. After he see he's nazi fires and deletions are wrong he uses parts of it in his ``later editions``. Funny editor ... But hey he's good for wikis profit isnt it if you resell content.`	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
673,699,686	` Well fancy named Presidents Cup are also ``placement games`` .. And i just tried to provide some insight to some casual reader months/years form now what are seeding positions for that ``another placement playoffs``. And how do you explain match between 1-4 decides better placement and between 2-3 lower placement?? If these were direct placement matches all that table would be unnecessary. And after all we have FOUR GROUPS in preliminary round and direct confrontation couldnt decide fair placement. Dont you think that?! Little bit of cold logic before you burn your nazi torch would be a good thing. `	2,015	false	user	blocked	dev	false
673,708,229	:You're pretty quick there Taggy. I'm glad people like you are looking out for readers. I'll add a source in just a moment. I'm looking for instructions on how to do it. YOU ::Hey. I'm sorry if I was a bit rude. I had a rough day and I came to Wikipedia for some peace and quiet— when I see something wrong I just can't wait to fix it! I care about this project that much. I'll try and be friendlier next time. I know how important it is to be civil, and I'm working on it. I hope you stay around. This link might help you out: Help:Introduction to referencing ::::I'm so pleased with you both. Now, carry on, we have an encyclopedia to write ;)	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
673,740,932	==Personal attacks (from Annonymous proxy)== Hi, i am Gabucho181, im attacking you and using IP proxy, youre a fucking shit, bitch.............	2,015	false	user	blocked	dev	true
673,741,814	:This is a shit for me, STOP MAKING NON-VANDALISM, please, im infringing the Wikippedia use, as a result, Wikipedia will renamed as WikiPROSTITUTE, fuck you, bitch.........	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	true
673,745,337	:::since deadliest was covered in the first half of the sentence, the second should specifically say injured imo	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
673,760,837	== Propagandist movie == This movie is the best example of how bad mouthing India gets you accepted in upper echelons of Indian power establishment. In a country where married men are more than twice likely to commit suicide than women and where domestic violence is literally legal against men (and not just by wife but by anybody who wife supports), this movie goes out of its way to invent an abusive husband and then justifies murder by his wife. And it gets accolades as a 'thought provoking' piece and 'realism' by people who have no idea about real India.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
673,769,503	` :The short answer is: no. The tow maneuvers look almost identical from outside the cockpit, but from inside it is clear that there is a very distinct difference. In an aileron roll, you pull up on the stick and then push it forward again (going back o a neutral position), and then roll with the ailerons using no elevator. It's the aerial version of ``popping a wheelie.`` :In a slow roll, you may be rolling as fast as possible or you may take a full ten minutes to roll the plane. In this case, you have to use both rudder and elevator during the roll to keep on course, or else you'll find yourself in a nose die towards the ground. An aileron roll is fairly easy for a beginner, but a slow roll takes a great amount of practice even for an expert. An aileron roll is clumsy an uncoordinated, but extremely fun, while a slow roll is precise and difficult. An aileron roll will also keep the g-force positive, while a slow roll turns you all around like clothes in a dryer. `	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
673,779,490	Go check his fake source link and see if theres such table on ihf.com ... Nooopeee	2,015	false	user	blocked	dev	false
673,789,786	*Strong Oppose remember, remember, the fifth of November and all that. This is a historical reference, and the historical nature of the origin of the term and event should probably be kept as the primary name. Maybe 'Bonfire Night' should redirect to here, with another name for that page.	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
673,796,768	That's what you're heavily implying in linking to the 2015 Ramadan attacks carried out by ISIS. I'm deleting that editorialism again because it's pointless and leading which is exactly how you intended it to be, Gregory. :::::	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
673,797,307	I see another user has removed your baseless, leading editorialism. Good on him, I must say. :::::: As it stands, I've reverted some of your changes considering you're really the polar opposite of even remote objectivity when it comes to this state of affairs.	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
673,810,329	` I doubt ``Bagration of Mukhrani`` is a standard form in scholarship. A quick look at Gbooks shows that that isn't the case. Bagration-Moukhransky is far more used. However, if there is a concensus that ``Bagration of Mukhrani`` should be used, I revoke my move proposal. `	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
673,817,830	` : No, I don't think so. ``Shuvat Rachel`` is an illegal Israeli settlement project in the Palestinian West Bank. Hamas affiliates have nothing to do with the international jihadi elements that are so prominently featured in that category. : You can file the attack under ``nationalistic terrorism`` if that gets you off but it's fundamentally wrong to characterize Hamas as being motivated through conservative Islamism. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
673,819,181	: I'm editing this page as you're well-known for your un-objective style of editing. Call it whatever you want and we'll see about changing it to something more acceptable after the fact.	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
673,820,436	== Removed the link to the Lee Rigby article == As, once again, nationalist-motivated attacks by predominately nationalist Palestinians have nothing to do with the antics of sympathizers of international Salafist Jihadism.	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
673,823,097	` ::: There's nothing ``harassing`` in what I've said to you ever since I found out that you exist. That's just melodrama on your part. ::: I see no reason to be polite to you considering the game you're playing as far as creating myopic articles and your edits go. ::: `	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
673,830,844	I didn't want to vandalise the 1961 F-84 Thunderstreak incident. Have you understood dirty fucking jew.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	true
673,834,624	==Modern equivalents for 14th century financial sums are not considered accurate by historians== I Note your comment Here. Checking the Inflation template it is referenced to indices produced by Gregory Clark (economist) via the http://measuringworth.com/aboutus.php website which would seem to have the support of some pretty heavy weight economic historians. How have you formed the view you expressed when reverting?	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
673,866,404	REDIRECT Talk:World Series of Fighting 24: Fitch vs. Okami	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
673,879,417	== Mullah Omar photos == I do not think the picture used in the current article is the only known image of the man. This screen-shot of Mullah Omar in 1996 holding the cloak of Muhammad filmed by the BBC shows him , This image is also believed to be of him before he lost his right eye , This image of a man described as being Mullah Omar looks very similar to this image and this image , shown in this Vanity Fair article also bears similarities with , in terms of the beard line along the mans cheekbones.	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
673,883,757	::And I forget to add these images:,, ::There is no more certainty that the image used in the article is him then any other image which purports to be him. The New York Times can make any statement they like regarding this, it doesn't mean that they are correct. Far more reliable sources use many images depicting him than just the one used in the article stating it is the only one known. This article states that a different image is one of the few images known to be him while this states that the two images used by the U.S State Department, of which the one from the article is from, are not of Omar . So there is no real consensus over which images are of him or not, nor of when each picture was taken. This article describes the current image used in the article as being taken from the late 1990's , in contrast to the Vanity Fair article which stated it was taken in 1993. I'm not saying the image is not of him, but I am saying that stating it is the only confirmed photo or the only known photo of him is probably not a correct statement. It might give readers the impression that it could be true, when it might not be.	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
673,891,995	No question has been dodged as none have been posed in any coherent manner. This dogged insistence on rules again borders on obsession. Wikipedia is about contributions that make sense, not blind obedience to self-imposed rules. Besides, your interpretation of these rules is just that, a misguided interpretation. I fail to see what you are trying to accomplish aside from antagonizing other editors who make sensible, and in my view, highly valuable contributions.	2,015	false	article	blocked	dev	false
673,892,271	:: This is amazing. Do you have any idea how inappropriate this sounds? This translation has been provided for the benefit of Wikipedia readers, and most certainly not to appease your inexplicable adherence to 'rules'. To date, you have provided absolutely no contribution to this article, only obstructive comments.	2,015	false	article	blocked	test	false
673,911,982	* Corn Belt * Cotton Belt * Black Belt * Numerous other examples at List of belt regions of the United States.	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
673,926,664	Violation of 1RR== You have just violated the 1RR at 2015 Shuvat Rachel shooting. ==	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
673,926,936	: It seems that there's only on Israel-Palestine a comprehensive effort from pro-Israel, anti-Palestine editors to try and memorialize every single Israeli who is wounded or killed, at the same time trying to hinder efforts to do the same for the Palestinians killed by Israelis and Jews. Also there's the problem of people like you pulling a Sharon/Netanyahu and trying to tie Palestinian nationalists to Al Qaeda and now ISIS.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
673,927,267	: And again, I'm removing it.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
673,930,475	== Your wrong stupid == Your Vandilising carlos slim wiki your wrong his net worth is not 65.2 idiot.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
673,930,805	== Recent status == I saw this in the news today, and looking at the current article is seems a bit dated. Not really eager to get involved, but I think some updating is needed.	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
673,931,422	== your wrong stupid == Go check the net worth of carlos slim and you will see that i'm correct and leave me the fuck alone i do what i want bitch.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
673,932,763	== Forbes == What more reliable source then forbes you need idiot second where do you get your source go check the net worth its 72.9 you stupid.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
673,941,248	` ===Closing comment=== This nomination is being put back into the GAN reviewing pool. The review is now over 135 days old, the oldest by nearly two months, and the current reviewer has not posted any new review material to the review page since May 8, despite several reminders on Dirtlawyer1's talk page and here, and assertions that he would ``be back on the case`` that day (July 6), was ``on it`` (July 17), and was ``working on comments now`` (July 24). In fact, 1300 edits have been made on Wikipedia by the reviewer since that July 6 talk-page statement, but none of them have continued this review or another incomplete one, for Talk:Vratislav Lokvenc/GA1, now 75 days old. It is extremely unfair for a nominator to have to wait four and a half months once the review has been opened, and it's made worse when you consider that the nomination was submitted over ten months old, the oldest extant nomination by over three months. With the GA Cup about to start its second round, it is likely to be picked up by a new reviewer in a matter of days, and finished with reasonable dispatch. As I pointed out on Dirtlawyer1's talk page earlier this week, the Good Article instructions page says, This commitment has not been met here, and it's time to find a new reviewer who will meet it. `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false

672,998,329

` : This is not a translation of the Greek article. I was looking for good-quality articles in foreign languages that we're missing from en.wiki, and I did read the Greek article, but I did not translate any part of it. I was negligibly inspired by the Greek article. It is impossible for the ``majority of the article to have original content``, since they both cover the same bleeding topic. What would you like me to do, pretend that it lies in the Adriatic Sea? `

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

673,025,072

:Support merge. Summary tables are more efficient.

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

673,028,698

` ::Going through your edit history, it would appear that you do absolutely nothing other than propose random articles for deletion. I regret to inform you that this one won't be deleted, as it's plainly notable. The fact that you've never heard of it does not qualify it for deletion. A quick Google search could have told you that the film was notable. Next time, perhaps you should actually do some research about the subjects of articles before trying to have the articles deleted because ``I've never heard of it, so it's clearly not notable``. Regardless, I have expanded the article to include some more sources. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

673,046,275

. Note that like all else this is owned by the Bucksham Co-operative

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

673,052,580

* Support per the eminently sensible, long-standing consensus that languages which share their name with a peoples or country - or anything else of significance - should be naturally disambiguated. We don't make the titles of articles ambiguous simply because they cover the primary topic.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

673,056,484

::: I don't see why it might be far too soon, or why Kwami's behaviour might call for shutting the RM.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

673,084,318

:: That's not a personal attack or really anything other that calling him what he is. I'll stop not because of any other reasons then some Hasbara den mother like Jayjjg or whatever his name is trying to have me barred as a result.

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

673,087,172

` :::: Oh I thought you were referring to what I said about his ``contributions``. All right, then. :::: `

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

673,150,550

I really don't know what you mean on my talk page. I added citations to two articles in medical journals. It would be more helpful if you gave direct info as to what is wrong rather than a generic cut and paste regarding recommended practice.

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

673,150,620

Unclear on what you are referring to

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

673,155,558

` :::When writing about a future SCHEDULED event, such as this year's Canadian Election, one has to make the assumption that everything will go as normal. It has to be assumed that there will NOT be a declaration of war or a zombie invasion or a terrorist attack that would upend the system. If there is a consensus in the ``real world`` that something must happen by a certain date, then Wikipedia must reflect that. The Democratic National committee is within it's rights to cancel next year's convention and declare Hillary to be the nominee if it wants. Will it? NO!!!!!! The disruption that a gratuitous repeal of the fixed election act by Parliament months or weeks before a scheduled dissolution would have been enormous. There is a reasonableness test that must be applied, and barring the zombies, delaying the election into 2016 or later fails. `

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

673,159,895

== Arrogant user torin == You should return money you steal.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

true

673,164,972

:No, correction: it only speaks about the present-day community, not about origins.

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

673,178,409

== 26 July 17:03 UTC eh? == There once was a 'pedian from doylestownNaN But it was easy to enquire When s-protection would expire And quietly begin a count down RELEASED UNDER DA CREATIVE COMMONS SHARE ALIKE LICENCE BY UHHHHH INDUSTRIES ===Anyway=== I can once again make it EXTREMELY clear that I am not a massive fan of da graceful slick nor his aiders or abettors.

2,015

false

user

blocked

dev

false

673,178,618

== 26 July 17:03 UTC eh? == There once was a 'pedian from doylestownNaN But it was easy to enquire When s-protection would expire And quietly begin a count down RELEASED UNDER DA CREATIVE COMMONS SHARE ALIKE LICENCE BY UHHHHH INDUSTRIES ===Anyway=== I can once again make it EXTREMELY clear that I am not a massive fan of da graceful slick nor his aiders or abettors.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

673,179,037

== 26 July 17:03 UTC eh? == There once was a 'pedian from doylestownNaN But it was easy to enquire When s-protection would expire And quietly begin a count down RELEASED UNDER DA CREATIVE COMMONS SHARE ALIKE LICENCE BY UHHHHH INDUSTRIES ===Anyway=== I can once again make it EXTREMELY clear that I am not a massive fan of da graceful slick nor his aiders or abettors.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

673,179,101

== 26 July 17:03 UTC eh? == There once was a 'pedian from doylestownNaN But it was easy to enquire When s-protection would expire And quietly begin a count down RELEASED UNDER DA CREATIVE COMMONS SHARE ALIKE LICENCE BY UHHHHH INDUSTRIES ===Anyway=== I can once again make it EXTREMELY clear that I am not a massive fan of da graceful slick nor his aiders or abettors.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

673,203,018

: Same thing, no difference. Fée is the Old French spelling, while Fay is the middle/modern English spelling (the word was borrowed from Old French, mind you).

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

673,213,788

` ::: Gone again, bud. NYT was maybe the one really objective source and that mentioned the use of the takbir in passing, without trying to make any grandiose claims or sensationalism out of it. We both know that PFLP affiliates are really the furthest thing from conservative Islamists or ``jihadists``, so the fact of the matter is that the link to the ``takbir in jihadism`` subsection is intentionally misleading. ::: `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

673,213,936

==Islamic terrorism== ER, Hamas is the Muslim Brotherhood, if the Muslim Brotherhood isn't Islamist, what is?

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

673,214,699

: The issue, Gregory, is the fact that your edits are all about trying to make the insinuation that Hamas is connected to, or working with ISIS, and that these attacks are tied to the ISIS Ramadan attacks at the end of June. : This is blatant falsehood, not least because Hamas and ISIS are enemies and actively in a state of open confrontation as far as the Gaza Strip is concerned. : Hamas is Nationalist-Islamist. ISIS is Salafi Jihadi/Wahhabi-Takfiri. There's a big big difference to anyone who actually cares to pay attention/not actively mislead people. ::

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

673,215,128

` ==Changed another link== I changed ``Islamic terrorist incidents in the 2010s`` to ``Israeli settlements`` considering the former is all about listing the work of Al Qaeda and other international Jihadi movements, and as a result, the latter is considerably more relevant in the case of this shooting. : `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

673,236,594

` ::And the Club de Fútbol de Oporto seem to be becoming a base for a Spanish annexation of Portugal. Well, it's five days until I go to my first ``game`` of this season, a friendly an hour and a half up the road against a team I already travelled to last season, and not the most attractive place on Earth either. Still, I couldn't turn down the offer from a friend to go. On an unrelated note, you may have noticed I'm no longer semi-retired. I had reached the epiphany that university was just a faceless moneymaking scheme keeping me off unemployment statistics for four years (I learnt absolutely nothing and still passed the first year, talk about ``higher education``, gimmee the fucking diploma now and get this charade over with) but it seems I can't do anything worthwhile without it. It's back to the madhouse I go this September. It's a ridiculous amount of money I pay for about three hours ``teaching`` per day (spread across the day so I can't do anything else with my time), and everybody else fills their offtime with drugs...while I edit here. Meh `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

673,246,617

` :::Yeah, so I add two interesting and important new, relevant references to an article which indicates potential harm to pregnant women on the Paracetamol page. These are removed because you guys don't like primary sources? This is ridiculous and frankly an extreme case of what is wrong with Wikipedia. My wife is pregnant. I for sure want to know about potential harm of this drug. I would think as a medical professional that you would be more inspired by the ``first do no harm`` idea. The fact that you Wikipedia jerks are so focused on having only sources from a narrow range of whatever it takes for a given article is so frustrating. I've continued to run into this kind of thing. You would think that academic journals have taken over Wikipedia. The idea that I have actually improved the article with my additions, and that others can improve it further, has completely escaped much of the Wikipedia culture these days. Wikipedia has simply forgotten the idea that this is collaboratively edited, rather than having a coterie of people who simply reject all edits if they do not thread the eye of the needle through the dozens of acronym style guides. You guys are disgusting, really. You are standing on the shoulders of millions of edits and now you reject the very thing that got you to where you are, namely lots of collaboratively edited small improvements. Now any change has to go through hurdles that would never have created Wikipedia in the first place. The fact that you have excluded something that is evidence of significant danger to pregnant women based on this culture of exclusiveness should trouble you deeply. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

673,246,952

` == Hyperactivity and Neural Development - Censorship == Two recent studies indicate problems in hyperactivity and neural development of children. :Yeah, so I add two interesting and important new, relevant references to an article which indicates potential harm to pregnant women on the Paracetamol page. These are removed because you guys don't like primary sources? This is ridiculous and frankly an extreme case of what is wrong with Wikipedia. My wife is pregnant. I for sure want to know about potential harm of this drug. I would think as a medical professional that you would be more inspired by the ``first do no harm`` idea. The fact that you Wikipedia jerks are so focused on having only sources from a narrow range of whatever it takes for a given article is so frustrating. I've continued to run into this kind of thing. You would think that academic journals have taken over Wikipedia. The idea that I have actually improved the article with my additions, and that others can improve it further, has completely escaped much of the Wikipedia culture these days. Wikipedia has simply forgotten the idea that this is collaboratively edited, rather than having a coterie of people who simply reject all edits if they do not thread the eye of the needle through the dozens of acronym style guides. You guys are disgusting, really. You are standing on the shoulders of millions of edits and now you reject the very thing that got you to where you are, namely lots of collaboratively edited small improvements. Now any change has to go through hurdles that would never have created Wikipedia in the first place. The fact that you have excluded something that is evidence of significant danger to pregnant women based on this culture of exclusiveness should trouble you deeply. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

673,248,003

== ANI == You have left me with no choice.

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

673,279,149

Two out of three of your sources are rubbish and, I think, show you up for what you are. There's a lot of claptrap coming from Israel over Hamas being one and the same with ISIS, and then you have Sisi simply not liking them because of their connection to the deposed Muslim Brotherhood government in Egypt. :::: Hamas is Islamist-Nationalist (and so the Wahhabis of ISIS see them as heretical) and there's not really any evidence to the claims of Hamas and ISIS colluding in the Sinai. It's by and large Israeli nonsense of the kind they've been rattling off since AQ became such a hot issue. ::::

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

673,287,455

REDIRECT Talk:Islamic Consultative Assembly

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

673,291,957

:: This isn't about my feelings, it is about your behavior. You revert me with no reason, then start quoting this bureaucratic nonsense, then threaten me with banning due to my disruptive editing. This is why Wikipedia is dying, cannibalizing its editors and edits in a Kafkaesque farce. Congratulations, I'm sure your no-doubt proper and uplifting ZYZZYXRD will be cited upon its demise. You may want to try and comprehend your own actions, and not my feelings. See .

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

673,292,141

` == Disruptive Activity == Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Paracetamol, you may be blocked from editing. (email) :Yeah, so I add two interesting and important new, relevant references to an article which indicates potential harm to pregnant women on the Paracetamol page. These are removed because you guys don't like primary sources? This is ridiculous and frankly an extreme case of what is wrong with Wikipedia. My wife is pregnant. I for sure want to know about potential harm of this drug. I would think as a medical professional that you would be more inspired by the ``first do no harm`` idea. The fact that you Wikipedia jerks are so focused on having only sources from a narrow range of whatever it takes for a given article is so frustrating. I've continued to run into this kind of thing. You would think that academic journals have taken over Wikipedia. The idea that I have actually improved the article with my additions, and that others can improve it further, has completely escaped much of the Wikipedia culture these days. Wikipedia has simply forgotten the idea that this is collaboratively edited, rather than having a coterie of people who simply reject all edits if they do not thread the eye of the needle through the dozens of acronym style guides. You guys are disgusting, really. You are standing on the shoulders of millions of edits and now you reject the very thing that got you to where you are, namely lots of collaboratively edited small improvements. Now any change has to go through hurdles that would never have created Wikipedia in the first place. The fact that you have excluded something that is evidence of significant danger to pregnant women based on this culture of exclusiveness should trouble you deeply. :: I'm sorry that I've upset you, but the fact is we get hundreds upon hundreds of poor quality changes every day. That is why we've written WP:MEDRS which I pointed to when I reverted you. There is also an excellent essay on why we adhere so strongly to it at WP:WHYMEDRS. The fact is that many primary studies are either performed on mice or on very small populations so that their results can't be transferred into clinical practise. MEDRS is no catch all, but it helps us and makes patrolling many articles and removing citations from the daily mail easier. I would also like to point out that we are working on getting these types of warnings into our articles automatically, for example by having FDA warnings automatically added. ::I understand it may feel as if you're being reverted by a faceless mass, but I assure you if you had simply taken up the discussion it would have been far more likely to be productive. (email) ::: This isn't about my feelings, it is about your behavior. You revert me with no reason, then start quoting this bureaucratic nonsense, then threaten me with banning due to my disruptive editing. This is why Wikipedia is dying, cannibalizing its editors and edits in a Kafkaesque farce. Congratulations, I'm sure your no-doubt proper and uplifting ZYZZYXRD will be cited upon its demise. You may want to try and comprehend your own actions, and not my feelings. See . `

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

673,292,577

These were both large studies not having anything to do with mice. These rules are not useful, and essay reading should not be a requirement for submitting actual value to the article. Again, how would Wikipedia even exist if this kind of hurdle was required to get it started? This behavior is not sustainable. Eventually the remaining admins will actually reach the end of their productive lives and then what, Wikipedia will live on as a set of revert bots? Most likely.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

673,348,183

:pure bullshit.

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

true

673,357,756

` ==Capitalisation== MOS:INSTITUTIONS says: :``Generic words for institutions (university, college, hospital, high school) do not take capitals: ::Incorrect (generic): The University offers programs in arts and sciences. ::Correct (generic): The university offers programs in arts and sciences. ::Correct (title): The University of Delhi offers programs in arts and sciences.`` So in this article, ``society`` should be capitalised in ``the Fakenham and Dereham Railway Society``, and not capitalised when written as ``the society``, and ``the Mid-Norfolk Railway Preservation Trust``, but ``the trust``. This is Wikipedia style. is insisting on capitalising these words on the basis that ``This article is written in British English, not Wikipedlish.`` It is not clear that there is a standard British style for this. Take, for example, the University of Oxford Style Guide. Page 4 states: ``Capitalise only when used as part of the title of a department, not when referring to a department without using its full name`` and provides this example: ``The Department for Work and Pensions has to make significant cuts this year, as do many government departments.`` The guide says pretty much the same thing with reference to colleges, faculties, divisions, and fellows. There will be other style guides, of course, but I think this demonstrates that there is no one British style that should supersede Wikipedia style in this article. | `

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

673,361,689

` == You Are an Awesome wikipedian == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` | Some shit |- |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | Some droppings of filthy muck mess to feel you better. Don't bother myself |}`

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

673,429,139

== Changes revered.. May I know why? == Hello, Some of the changes that I did recently on the pages were reverted by you even though I had given reference. May I know what is considered as trivial? I am not expert in Wikipedia editing, so please explain.

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

673,433,209

` == Congratulation & my appreciation for your Efforts to create the list of Notable Blogs== This is a great effort by the Author of the `` List of Blogs `` who create the list of notable blogs. However the guideline of notability is still - not as per wikipedia policy - I severally suffered from this and the great thing is that you can not contest the deletion n if you try to do that there are several other come in a minutes. Now notability is the subject of some admins self created mind made policy, which they apply any where to delete put notices, reverting or do any thing which they want. The list of creating notable blogs are really a good efforts and I request all admins let this page be on wikipedia & co-operate with this author with positive mind so the people can take good references and create knowledgeable , fair articles with the help of sources. priyadarshivishal23`

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

673,433,571

Authors who did efforts

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

673,446,009

Your user page indicates you're a left-wing liberalist bastard! Why is in Wikipedia so much left-wing scum?!

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

673,472,504

== x factor == Excuse me but why are you removing my content on x factor ? You have no right !

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

673,473,602

` == Which Former Employers? == ``After the war she wrote a revealing memoir describing her former employers as gangsters.`` I don't think it's clear whether this is the Germans, the British, or the French. `

2,015

false

article

random

train

false

673,473,683

` *Oppose due to ambiguity, per Sawol. Noted earlier comments re: ``clear commonname argument for Kia pointing here``, ``no other significant use for 'Kia, but I'm not sure it is that clear, and a case could be made that should be the dab page. – `

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

673,497,479

` Hi Red - When you get a chance, take a look at the Charles E. Bassett article. I've addressed just about all of the suggestions that you have made - at least up to this point. It may require further tweaking, here and there, but I think you'll find my latest version very much closer to what you hand in mind. While I have your attention I had an idea that you might be able to assist with - since your technical chops are undoubtedly better than mine. In short - Is it possible to move the ``Dodge City Peace Commission`` photo from its current location, blow it up to a larger size, and place that enlarged photo so that it is placed in what is currently a large blank space next to the Table of Contents? I think it would make a far more attractive page. I probably should mention that, prior to turning to writing full-time, I worked for several years as a corporate art director - who specialized in page layouts. Let me know what you think about the idea. Also let me know if there are any remaining issues with the Bassett article that you think should be addressed. I'm sure we can work together. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

673,510,178

, this could lead to a conflict of interest

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

673,539,375

` ::I haven't the slightest idea of what you talking about. But you probably need to screw myself. What is narcissist? English is not my native language so I prefer not to condemn your vain. Although you were pointing out a harassment against BBS or LTTE disciple. I don't care any conservative rubbish, and I'm not an aspirant like yourself. I merely concern politics in Sri lanka on a scholarly platform; not in arrogant or vulgar nature. But hypocrites criticize some ethical issues without any basis regarding our customs in Sri Lanka. I don't know why you keen to bother my self on my page savagely. So literal you scream behalf of your self and that doesn't give me any sense. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

673,544,595

:::: Which sentences have been lifted from the Greek article?

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

673,547,355

:: Since these wrestling article pages took their current form about 7 years ago, one of the rules has always been that if a wrestler holds a championship, he automatically gets included as part of the roster. PJ Black won the King of the Mountain Championship at last night's Impact Wrestling tapings, thus he automatically gets included on the roster. The note at the top of the page is to let everybody know that TNA and GFW have a talent exchange agreement, so they don't have to include every GFW guy that makes an appearance on Impact Wrestling. Black (KOTM Champion) and Jarrett (general manager) get special mentions due to their specific roles...PJB has a title, and JJ is the authority figure. Once PJB loses his title, he'll be removed, as will Jarrett once he loses his authority figure role. Vjmlhds

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

673,548,439

Possible sources for adding Asexuality as a topic http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2008/sep/08/relationships.healthandwellbeing http://www.asexuality.org/en/topic/98479-happiness-and-asexual/ https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/living-single/200912/asexuals-who-are-they-and-why-are-they-important

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

673,553,482

== This idiot == How can you possibly know what I OWN and Don't OWN? Obviously NOT because YOU seem to think that you are God's seeing eye and can see what I own. Pathetic that a lonely virgin Canadian has the balls to say what I OWN and Don't OWN. I will be taking this matter through the proper channels to get you removed from your wreckless position. Have fun playing god and thinking you know what people own. P.s. I do OWN all of those pictures bitch .

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

true

673,554,264

== I have been flagged == Anothwr editor which I have attacked has accused me of theft. Also of copyright infringement, and pretending to know what I OWN.

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

673,559,222

` :::I'll add that a major problem with the term 'North American football' is that really only means 'American and Canadian football'. Even if you use the most narrow definition of 'North American' (US, Canada, and Mexico), 'football' means something different in Mexico. `

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

673,575,820

:::You are not waiting for others. You have clearly demonstrated on your tedious editing that you do not want this particular thing being shown about your temple. You have to wait for a proper consensus to be reached and have others input. I will reach out to other admins for help. You are offically edit warring at this point and it is not okay. I have provided over a dozen citations so knock it off.

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

673,586,921

Dear Human3015 == You are making unnecessary issue all the Text and Judgement are related to the Hind Marriage Act. I am not able to understand why you want to distroy my contribution. What is the exact issue. First you told that blogs are not the reliable sources. Then I added the more reliable source e.g the official website , Books and Publishers. When I added the reliable sources , You put other unnesessary objection. Though I explained you the reason the Case Law , the Law must be in a form that it was delivered. One must not play with case law with their own words & interpret it if this will happen the reliability of the Law will be lost. All edits done by me are as per wikipedia policy e.g reliability , Neutrality , Varifiability. But you are deleting the edits. Rast is up to you. My Regards. priyadarshivishal23 ==

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

673,587,051

Now you are telling that It is not related to Hindu Marriage Act. However it is purely related to Hindu Marriage Act.

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

673,607,688

::I can see three copies of that advice on your talk page in the boxed items at the right hand side.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

673,609,814

REDIRECT Talk:Count On Me (Whitney Houston and CeCe Winans song)

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

673,630,794

== Right Sector == Right Sector is involved in the current conflict occurring in the Donbass region. I am now aware you have a biasness for your lack of justification in removing material which is well known. Because you seem to think it's fine to remove the Right Sector from the info-box, I will remove the RNU , as I can see no fairer way then to remove a Russian-centric group while you unjustifiably removed a Ukrainian-centric group, and labeled the addition of them as not 'constructive'. There is a better case to be made for Right Sector involvement in the conflict rather than RNU involvement.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

673,643,796

REDIRECT Talk:UFC Fight Night: Poirier vs. Duffy

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

673,649,729

REDIRECT Talk:The Dick & Paula Celebrity Special

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

673,651,621

` *Alternate #2 to Metro Center (WMATA station). The ``Washington Metro`` suffix is for the lines, rather than the stations. - `

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

673,653,031

== Question about feminism == Hi, Do you prefer running outside with your top on or with your boobs hanging out like Chelsea Handler? Thanks, Max

2,015

false

user

blocked

dev

false

673,655,862

` : Looking at Category:WikiProject Washington Metro articles, there appear to be more articles that use the suffix ``(Washington Metro)`` than there are ``(WMATA station)``. I did see one or two ``(Washington Metrorail)``. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

673,658,827

== The 1947 ISO Standardisation == More information is needed on the standardisation that ISO did in 1947. For example, there were separate French, German, and Japanese screw threads of the common designations, and the Swiss had a set for the tiny screws used in watchmaking.

2,015

false

article

random

train

false

673,658,935

` :::::I have several issues with it, that's why I think it's worth discussing. First, there is no clear consensus of the meaning of the genre, and since there is no current consensus of what makes a film an epic film, it shouldn't be used in the lead as it will not help a user understand the film. My other issue is with the category ``science fiction war film``, which has no source or mention in the article. Can you show me how it should fit with this article? Preferably with some sort of source, or at least a definition of the genre that shows that Star Wars fits in. I'll try to dig up the 2001 discussion. I hope I've made myself a bit more clear now. `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

673,662,231

`::: Don't be dense ... WP:USSTATION clearly states that ``... where the word ``Station`` is part of the proper name, it should be capitalized, which is the case here. Regardless of that, the pertinent point is that the renaming is to avoid a disambig page. Please stay focused on the key issue. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

673,667,762

::::: - Just read the sign! -

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

673,683,012

Fuck off Dicksternet you dickhead.

2,015

false

user

blocked

test

true

673,698,645

` Rpo.castro ... you're just another Kante4's alias ... there's no other vandalism besides yours, khm ``Kante4``, nazi attitude ... You always try to divert any contribution that you dislike (Why?) to vandalism when you're wrong. Just last time you talked about ````DIFFERENT TOURNAMET SCHEME````. It's not like every tournament, that's held every two years or so, changes their competition structure. I'm wondering how didn't you say they abolished that funny named ``presidents cup`` which is nothing else fancy name for group losers placement playoffs. And when you lack any reason then you push your nazi button and call others vandals. Stop using other accounts to add nothing constructive in article where you obviously didnt contribute ... just removing some clearing tables. As even i wont remember in the middle of the night why and where these nationakl teams were placed trhat way against each other. few words notification like ``1-4 placement`` ``play against each other`` you so sold as explanation actually lacks any evidence explanation for someone just try to casually read article after few months.`

2,015

false

user

blocked

dev

true

673,699,163

` That fellow Editor uses few aliases like rpo.castro when he dislikes others contributuons. Also uses confusion by inducing ``changing of tournament sceme`` every once in a while ... very often. And thas all he contributes. After he see he's nazi fires and deletions are wrong he uses parts of it in his ``later editions``. Funny editor ... But hey he's good for wikis profit isnt it if you resell content.`

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

673,699,686

` Well fancy named Presidents Cup are also ``placement games`` .. And i just tried to provide some insight to some casual reader months/years form now what are seeding positions for that ``another placement playoffs``. And how do you explain match between 1-4 decides better placement and between 2-3 lower placement?? If these were direct placement matches all that table would be unnecessary. And after all we have FOUR GROUPS in preliminary round and direct confrontation couldnt decide fair placement. Dont you think that?! Little bit of cold logic before you burn your nazi torch would be a good thing. `

2,015

false

user

blocked

dev

false

673,708,229

:You're pretty quick there Taggy. I'm glad people like you are looking out for readers. I'll add a source in just a moment. I'm looking for instructions on how to do it. YOU ::Hey. I'm sorry if I was a bit rude. I had a rough day and I came to Wikipedia for some peace and quiet— when I see something wrong I just can't wait to fix it! I care about this project that much. I'll try and be friendlier next time. I know how important it is to be civil, and I'm working on it. I hope you stay around. This link might help you out: Help:Introduction to referencing ::::I'm so pleased with you both. Now, carry on, we have an encyclopedia to write ;)

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

673,740,932

==Personal attacks (from Annonymous proxy)== Hi, i am Gabucho181, im attacking you and using IP proxy, youre a fucking shit, bitch.............

2,015

false

user

blocked

dev

true

673,741,814

:This is a shit for me, STOP MAKING NON-VANDALISM, please, im infringing the Wikippedia use, as a result, Wikipedia will renamed as WikiPROSTITUTE, fuck you, bitch.........

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

true

673,745,337

:::since deadliest was covered in the first half of the sentence, the second should specifically say injured imo

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

673,760,837

== Propagandist movie == This movie is the best example of how bad mouthing India gets you accepted in upper echelons of Indian power establishment. In a country where married men are more than twice likely to commit suicide than women and where domestic violence is literally legal against men (and not just by wife but by anybody who wife supports), this movie goes out of its way to invent an abusive husband and then justifies murder by his wife. And it gets accolades as a 'thought provoking' piece and 'realism' by people who have no idea about real India.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

673,769,503

` :The short answer is: no. The tow maneuvers look almost identical from outside the cockpit, but from inside it is clear that there is a very distinct difference. In an aileron roll, you pull up on the stick and then push it forward again (going back o a neutral position), and then roll with the ailerons using no elevator. It's the aerial version of ``popping a wheelie.`` :In a slow roll, you may be rolling as fast as possible or you may take a full ten minutes to roll the plane. In this case, you have to use both rudder and elevator during the roll to keep on course, or else you'll find yourself in a nose die towards the ground. An aileron roll is fairly easy for a beginner, but a slow roll takes a great amount of practice even for an expert. An aileron roll is clumsy an uncoordinated, but extremely fun, while a slow roll is precise and difficult. An aileron roll will also keep the g-force positive, while a slow roll turns you all around like clothes in a dryer. `

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

673,779,490

Go check his fake source link and see if theres such table on ihf.com ... Nooopeee

2,015

false

user

blocked

dev

false

673,789,786

*Strong Oppose remember, remember, the fifth of November and all that. This is a historical reference, and the historical nature of the origin of the term and event should probably be kept as the primary name. Maybe 'Bonfire Night' should redirect to here, with another name for that page.

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

673,796,768

That's what you're heavily implying in linking to the 2015 Ramadan attacks carried out by ISIS. I'm deleting that editorialism again because it's pointless and leading which is exactly how you intended it to be, Gregory. :::::

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

673,797,307

I see another user has removed your baseless, leading editorialism. Good on him, I must say. :::::: As it stands, I've reverted some of your changes considering you're really the polar opposite of even remote objectivity when it comes to this state of affairs.

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

673,810,329

` I doubt ``Bagration of Mukhrani`` is a standard form in scholarship. A quick look at Gbooks shows that that isn't the case. Bagration-Moukhransky is far more used. However, if there is a concensus that ``Bagration of Mukhrani`` should be used, I revoke my move proposal. `

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

673,817,830

` : No, I don't think so. ``Shuvat Rachel`` is an illegal Israeli settlement project in the Palestinian West Bank. Hamas affiliates have nothing to do with the international jihadi elements that are so prominently featured in that category. : You can file the attack under ``nationalistic terrorism`` if that gets you off but it's fundamentally wrong to characterize Hamas as being motivated through conservative Islamism. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

673,819,181

: I'm editing this page as you're well-known for your un-objective style of editing. Call it whatever you want and we'll see about changing it to something more acceptable after the fact.

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

673,820,436

== Removed the link to the Lee Rigby article == As, once again, nationalist-motivated attacks by predominately nationalist Palestinians have nothing to do with the antics of sympathizers of international Salafist Jihadism.

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

673,823,097

` ::: There's nothing ``harassing`` in what I've said to you ever since I found out that you exist. That's just melodrama on your part. ::: I see no reason to be polite to you considering the game you're playing as far as creating myopic articles and your edits go. ::: `

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

673,830,844

I didn't want to vandalise the 1961 F-84 Thunderstreak incident. Have you understood dirty fucking jew.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

true

673,834,624

==Modern equivalents for 14th century financial sums are not considered accurate by historians== I Note your comment Here. Checking the Inflation template it is referenced to indices produced by Gregory Clark (economist) via the http://measuringworth.com/aboutus.php website which would seem to have the support of some pretty heavy weight economic historians. How have you formed the view you expressed when reverting?

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

673,866,404

REDIRECT Talk:World Series of Fighting 24: Fitch vs. Okami

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

673,879,417

== Mullah Omar photos == I do not think the picture used in the current article is the only known image of the man. This screen-shot of Mullah Omar in 1996 holding the cloak of Muhammad filmed by the BBC shows him , This image is also believed to be of him before he lost his right eye , This image of a man described as being Mullah Omar looks very similar to this image and this image , shown in this Vanity Fair article also bears similarities with , in terms of the beard line along the mans cheekbones.

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

673,883,757

::And I forget to add these images:,, ::There is no more certainty that the image used in the article is him then any other image which purports to be him. The New York Times can make any statement they like regarding this, it doesn't mean that they are correct. Far more reliable sources use many images depicting him than just the one used in the article stating it is the only one known. This article states that a different image is one of the few images known to be him while this states that the two images used by the U.S State Department, of which the one from the article is from, are not of Omar . So there is no real consensus over which images are of him or not, nor of when each picture was taken. This article describes the current image used in the article as being taken from the late 1990's , in contrast to the Vanity Fair article which stated it was taken in 1993. I'm not saying the image is not of him, but I am saying that stating it is the only confirmed photo or the only known photo of him is probably not a correct statement. It might give readers the impression that it could be true, when it might not be.

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

673,891,995

No question has been dodged as none have been posed in any coherent manner. This dogged insistence on rules again borders on obsession. Wikipedia is about contributions that make sense, not blind obedience to self-imposed rules. Besides, your interpretation of these rules is just that, a misguided interpretation. I fail to see what you are trying to accomplish aside from antagonizing other editors who make sensible, and in my view, highly valuable contributions.

2,015

false

article

blocked

dev

false

673,892,271

:: This is amazing. Do you have any idea how inappropriate this sounds? This translation has been provided for the benefit of Wikipedia readers, and most certainly not to appease your inexplicable adherence to 'rules'. To date, you have provided absolutely no contribution to this article, only obstructive comments.

2,015

false

article

blocked

test

false

673,911,982

* Corn Belt * Cotton Belt * Black Belt * Numerous other examples at List of belt regions of the United States.

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

673,926,664

Violation of 1RR== You have just violated the 1RR at 2015 Shuvat Rachel shooting. ==

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

673,926,936

: It seems that there's only on Israel-Palestine a comprehensive effort from pro-Israel, anti-Palestine editors to try and memorialize every single Israeli who is wounded or killed, at the same time trying to hinder efforts to do the same for the Palestinians killed by Israelis and Jews. Also there's the problem of people like you pulling a Sharon/Netanyahu and trying to tie Palestinian nationalists to Al Qaeda and now ISIS.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

673,927,267

: And again, I'm removing it.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

673,930,475

== Your wrong stupid == Your Vandilising carlos slim wiki your wrong his net worth is not 65.2 idiot.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

673,930,805

== Recent status == I saw this in the news today, and looking at the current article is seems a bit dated. Not really eager to get involved, but I think some updating is needed.

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

673,931,422

== your wrong stupid == Go check the net worth of carlos slim and you will see that i'm correct and leave me the fuck alone i do what i want bitch.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

673,932,763

== Forbes == What more reliable source then forbes you need idiot second where do you get your source go check the net worth its 72.9 you stupid.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

673,941,248

` ===Closing comment=== This nomination is being put back into the GAN reviewing pool. The review is now over 135 days old, the oldest by nearly two months, and the current reviewer has not posted any new review material to the review page since May 8, despite several reminders on Dirtlawyer1's talk page and here, and assertions that he would ``be back on the case`` that day (July 6), was ``on it`` (July 17), and was ``working on comments now`` (July 24). In fact, 1300 edits have been made on Wikipedia by the reviewer since that July 6 talk-page statement, but none of them have continued this review or another incomplete one, for Talk:Vratislav Lokvenc/GA1, now 75 days old. It is extremely unfair for a nominator to have to wait four and a half months once the review has been opened, and it's made worse when you consider that the nomination was submitted over ten months old, the oldest extant nomination by over three months. With the GA Cup about to start its second round, it is likely to be picked up by a new reviewer in a matter of days, and finished with reasonable dispatch. As I pointed out on Dirtlawyer1's talk page earlier this week, the Good Article instructions page says, This commitment has not been met here, and it's time to find a new reviewer who will meet it. `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false