rev_id
int64 37.7k
700M
| comment
stringlengths 5
10k
| year
int64 2k
2.02k
| logged_in
bool 2
classes | ns
stringclasses 2
values | sample
stringclasses 2
values | split
stringclasses 3
values | attack
bool 2
classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
673,946,746
|
` : When you make a request, you must provide reliable sources. Don't expect others to verify the information for you. If you have a source, please provide it when you make a new request. 🍁 `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
673,948,234
|
` *However, there is now an article called Cecil (lion). `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
673,962,304
|
::I am not planning any personal attack except on those who deserve it (e.g. political-dictatorshiply agitators like you or the other evil one). Wikipedia is nearly full of mad left-wing bastards who block everyone which is righteous. You Pro-EU Fuckers! Go back where you came from! Long live the Freedom!
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
673,983,817
|
Fuck off, I do what I want.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
673,999,706
|
:Thanks for the response. Did you take a look at WP:COI? :As for better approaches to improve the article, WP:RS and WP:IS might be helpful to review before you start a discussion on the article talk page.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
674,012,727
|
REDIRECT Talk:1987 Indianapolis Ramada Inn A-7D Corsair II crash
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
674,033,940
|
` :Actually at the Rugrats article there is a ref for the location being Yucaipa. I'm not sure if the same ref would work for ``All Grown Up`` or not (although obviously since all the same characters are present they are still in the same location), nor am I at all familiar with Wikipedia category policies, but I feel that one, this is a new user making significant contributions to the project, and two, this is simply a category on a very low level article about an obscure animated series, that no action needs to be taken and no fixes need to be made. Good faith edits need good faith responses. `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
674,042,789
|
` == Kelly Ramsey Building == http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelly_Ramsey_Building Reference 7 is incorrect. It is linked to Kellyramsey.com. Please update this to kellyramsey.ca. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by == File:Peter_Lougheed.jpg == You reverted an edit of mine to File:Peter_Lougheed.jpg making it say again that it will be only be used on one article, when quite clearly it is not being used that way, as it is being shown on at least seven. If that flys in the face of the Wikipedia policy surrounding non-free images, I felt you should know. :I uploaded the image to be used only in one article. None of those other articles require the image for their comprehension. I believe those articles are not following the Wikipedia policy on non-free image use. `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
674,042,794
|
Calgary climate data|Calgary climate data
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
674,053,616
|
` *Sorry but nonsense. There is only one source who says ``Nocciolini``, all the other institutional sources say ``Nocciolini di Canzo`` or ``Nocciolini (Canzo)``, ``Noccioli - Canzo`` or similar (look also - in addiction to the already said - (Official touristic site of Comunità Montana)). And also the only source who says ``Nocciolini`` without Canzo has an OFFICIAL correspondant in the decree of Region Lombardy who says ``Nocciolini - Canzo``. That's not an interpretation, but only the comparison between two official documents. The Google search experiment goes as you say precisely because ``nocciolini`` is a term used for many things. Please look at the first result of the search ``Nocciolini cookie``! You can see the picture, they are a cookie, but totally different from the cookies we are talking about!. If you obtain ``only`` 1700 with ``Nocciolini cookie|biscuit Canzo`` you don't surprise me, because ``Nocciolini di Canzo`` are unknown out of western Lombardy! All the other results you had excluding the word ``Canzo`` refer to other topics, and that's a confirmation that the complete nomination ``Nocciolini di Canzo`` is absolutely necessary. Wikipedia Article title policy says to observe the criteria of recognizability, naturalness, precision, conciseness, consistency. The omission of ``di Canzo`` is against recognizability (as I said, but I see that you didn't pay attention to it, there are also Nocciolini di Chivasso in Italy, in the region of Piedmont, another cookie), naturalness (all in western Lombardy say ``Nocciolini di Canzo``, and when they say ``Nocciolini`` it's only because we are already talking about the town of Canzo), precision (you aren't precise if you use a vague term of Italian language, whose meaning is ``little hazelnuts``, to define ONE of the at least three pastries I saw on Google made with hazelnuts; we, native consumers and ``caller`` of the Nocciolini di Canzo, perceive the matter in this way: Nocciolini is a common noun, but with the precisation ``di Canzo``, it refer to a specific product; different case with Panettone, because on Italian dictionaries ``Panettone`` means one thing, the one of Milan: that's not a common noun). Evidently you can't use the criterium of conciseness in this case, because first of all comprehensibility is required! Regarding your accusation of insult, I didn't have intention to make insults. I was only laughing because the effect of the action you propose would be very funny for an Italian speaker. And I was explaining - as I see also FoCuSandLeArN recognized - that it would be a big error from the point of view of recognizability and precision. I synthetize that the title of this article must precise not only that we are talking about a cookie, but also that we are talking about ``this`` cookie. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
674,055,900
|
== You got a problem? == If you have a problem with my edits, you'll have to substantiate your removals. Removing material without reason is called vandalism. Consider this a warning.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
674,056,134
|
: Are you threatening me for disputing neutrality? I know in your country it's quite common to bully your way through a discussion and push outcomes you want. But this is not Russia.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
674,056,534
|
::: I'm done talking to you, bully. Read dispute resolution rules.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
674,071,055
|
`***The fact that you find a badly written stub to be more informative than a comprehensive and well illustrated featured article says more about you than it does about anything else. *`
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
674,083,641
|
` == Douchebag award == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` | Being a massive dick ) |- |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | YEEEY! You've been a massive douchebag! Here's your award. |}`
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
674,084,476
|
== Sorry girl == Sorry for going crazy on that Betty Logan girl...... She was just being really disruptive and rude to me. Lesson learned <3
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
674,085,508
|
` == Rude == Ummmm excuse you? I just posted a THANK YOU to you on here... And you just deleted it? Wow, like literally how RUDE can you be? That's a personal attack RIGHT THERE. Second of all, this isn't even about that. I'm trying to make that ugly page of the List of most expensive films slightly less horrible. The years are centered, the references are centered, but the budgets aren't?? That makes ZERO sense and it's triggering to me (someone who has OCD.) And you have the guts to tell me it's ``not needed``? I need to use that Wikipedia list a lot and I can't stand that it isn't centered. How does that in ANY way affect YOU? How dare you? How about leaving me the hell alone before I report you for stalking....... GOODBYE`
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
674,085,771
|
==NONSENSE?== MY MEDICAL CONDITION IS FUCKING NONSENSE TO YOU? GO FUCK YOURSELF I HOPE YOU DIE RIGHT NOW.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
674,087,066
|
Response: Hi, checking in. This is a response I was writing to Betty before I was banned: Mrs. Logan, this is a whole new level of rudeness. I have made it clear to you multiple times that I wanted to edit that page because I suffer from OCD. I need to use that particular page multiple times because I'm making a big report on movie-making. Because of my medical condition, I decided to do something that bothers absolutely nobody and center the budgets on that particular page, just like the references, years etc. are also centered on the page. You decided to jump in and undo it because it appears that you have nothing better to do than bother somebody for no reason. On top of that I did not even violate 3RR, so why are you reporting me? And on top of that Mrs. Logan, I have looked into your editing history and MULTIPLE people have reported you over the years.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
674,095,020
|
` :Hello - Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, which means that we are a tertiary source. So, one of our core principles is that we do not publish original research or our own personal opinions. If you want to publish your theories or interpretations, I recommend creating a personal website or a blog. '''' `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
674,114,378
|
::Not correct. Payess is in English dictionaries. Payot is not. Therefore, payess is English.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
674,126,324
|
`, 1 August 2015 (UTC) :: Of course I know that and NFC is the rationale I used when I removed the image from the Infobox in my edit summary. We can use ``fair use`` screenshot claims for WP hosted images in the article, but not the Infobox for identification. The barrier to using the image in the article would be related to commentary about the topic. 20:41`
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
674,137,973
|
` ::::Kyiv alone may not be, but Kyiv City State Administration is. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
674,145,591
|
== getting consensus in talk would be helpful == Yes, that's exactly my point! Instead of reverting sourced edits, why not TALK on the... well, let's call it a TALK page? Ever thought about it?
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
674,154,472
|
:::::^^^Again, I agree with this dude. No way Dem Party qualifies as center left to left. More accurate would be center right to center left.
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
674,154,659
|
::::::TFD is correct on all counts.
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
674,154,917
|
:::I stand corrected. I was confusing it with the old Tory Party.
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
674,167,687
|
== Su 30 MKM == Hey man thanks for chnages. Can fix my grammar on edit mkm section. thanks
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
674,168,736
|
== Lookhead martin f-35 == Do you know the f-35 fighter was totally joke? can explain the advantages of this aircraft to me..please I do not suggest you
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
674,169,038
|
Im try to friends with you.. explain to me about f35 not fight
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
674,182,258
|
REDIRECT Talk:UFC Fight Night: Belfort vs. Henderson 2
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
674,205,339
|
| topic = Agriculture, food and drink
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
674,225,203
|
::, I will leave it, but I used it the way it was for consistency. It is how Mansoor's predecessor Mohammed Omar has his info-box set out.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
674,236,383
|
, ijust make fun about F-35}}
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
674,250,930
|
` ::: Really , it should be obvious to you from context that I was implying that you were an unpaid or underpaid intern rather than a millionaire working directly for the Clintons. Admit it or not it really is surprisingly popular for political campaigns to hire sub-par, unofficial wikipedians in residence to try and out edit wikipedians that encourage a neutral view of their candidate. I don't know that I agree with all of edits but after and company teaming up to attack a single plea for citation I find it much easier to believe the Professor's good faith. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
674,254,590
|
REDIRECT Talk:Moisés Villarroel Angulo
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
674,266,567
|
Request to unblock me. Some idiotic editors take themselves too seriously.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
674,283,826
|
:Hi . All I changed was the leader as can be seen here. Pat Greene is still the leader in the article.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
674,294,232
|
` == Response == Hi, I saw both your message on my talk page and your email, and I felt I had to make a response. If the Zhaneta Byberi article is about you, please take several minutes to read the guideline Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. In short: creating or editing articles about yourself, your company, or anything else with which you may be closely attached, is strongly discouraged. I can explain why. One of the five pillars of Wikipedia is that we are an encyclopedia, and throughout the years we've developed many policies and guidelines regarding what kinds of content we want to include here. We have three ``core content policies``: all articles must be verifiable, written from a neutral point of view, and contain no original research. The reason we discourage editing or creating articles about yourself or your company is because when you do so, it can be hard to keep upholding the core content policies, especially the one about neutral point of view (neutral point of view means that Wikipedia explains sides fairly and without bias, as opposed to taking a side or being biased—it's actually our second pillar). When you are closely attached with a subject, you often have a distorted view of it, which causes you to have the tendency to write from a biased or non-neutral point of view. For example, you might inadvertently include more information that reflects on you positively while omitting verifiable information about you that may be more controversial. We call this having a conflict of interest. While editing in areas you have a conflict of interest in is not exactly prohibited, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible. Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Now, with regards to your request, it is possible to disable anonymous editing to Wikipedia articles using a method called semi-protection. However, it is only typically applied by administrators when there is evidence of persistent disruptive editing to a page. Semi-protection is not applied preemptively. I have examined the history of the Zhaneta Byberi article and found no evidence of disruptive editing that necessitates semi-protection. We are an encyclopedia that anyone can contribute to, and no editor can own articles. If you see an edit with which you disagree, feel free to revert it, but remember to assume good faith on the part of others—most contributors want to make the encyclopedia better, so if they revert your revert, talk it out on the talk page before reverting again. If you have any questions, please ask me on my talk page or submit another question to the Teahouse. We'll be glad to help. `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
674,297,794
|
:I agree that it was WP:NOTVAND. That said, having looked at the Thapar source, which you quote, I do wonder about ambiguity: association with Abhira is not the same as being sudra. In fact, that she names one group - sudra - and compares to other groups might suggest that they are distinguished rather than the same. I can't see the relevant page of Sharma. -
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
674,303,668
|
::Worth discussing are arguments for and against the relevance of inequality.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
674,305,581
|
Okay so no one's gonna address this? Guess that no one editing this page cares about accuracy.
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
674,310,051
|
== August 2015 == If you continue to make disruptive edits, as you did with Penny Plunderer, you will be reported, which can lead to being blocked for a period of time. You have already been warned once. If you think this is somehow a misunderstanding, you can contact me .
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
674,317,077
|
`:::::If you don't wish to convey that impression, perhaps you should reduce your meatpuppetry to non-conspicuous levels. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
674,322,147
|
Harassed, censored and threatened by Someguy1221 for expressing my opinions and views.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
674,323,988
|
== Help me! == Please help me with... I am being stalked, harassed and blocked by Someguy1221
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
674,324,980
|
I started being stalked, censored, harassed and threatened by various wikipedia admins including KERI and NEILN. I told them all to never contact me again and stop cyberbullying and harassing me. I wanted to block them buy there is no mechanism to do that. Next I'm blocked by Someguy1221. I request the block be lifted.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
674,325,971
|
I am currently blocked from editing
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
674,346,773
|
`::My intent is not to edit war, only to add an important paragraph or two to the article. Americans know all too well that our Native Americans weren't treated right in the old days (and still aren't in many cases) but that is no excuse to whitewash historical information be it a ``Featured Article`` or not. This same newspaper is already being relied on as a good and reliable source in the article (see the quote box). It is not good editing to conveniently leave out information that someone believes is not ``in line`` with the article when in fact the added information is highly relevant to Irataba's overall story. If any portion of what I added is objectionable, I am willing to compromise by having some of it removed but not all, and I am referring to the ``big Ingin`` passage at the end of the paragraph. That could be removed as perhaps objectionable to some readers and editors even though it is a direct quote from the source. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
674,349,865
|
` ::::The quote I speak of is ALREADY in the article (about Irataba's declining health in later years), and it's citation is to the newspaper that you now conveniently call ``a single primary source``. I have lived near indian reservations all my life. I am an advocate of indian rights, 24/7/365, and a proponent for the propagation of accurate indian histories. If I thought my addition to the article was defamatory or ``outright racist`` as you suggest, I would not have added it to the article. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
674,360,757
|
` :I did assume good faith until you proved me wrong, Melbourne. The next time I see you vandalize a page I will label your vandalism as vandalism. If you want to call admin attention to yourself though, that's fine. I feel like some of your more POV edits and your more strikingly obvious coordinations with similarly biased wikipedians might benifit from some administration. `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
674,361,352
|
` ::I feel like you have more to worry about by posting yourself on the WP:ANI than I possibly could. Especially if they review your POV edits on the varrious HRC related pages. As always, the best way to stop people from calling out your misbehavior is to stop misbehaving. `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
674,368,391
|
` :Hah, not so good about keeping your word huh? You couldn't wait until you had vandalized again to falsely report me? `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
674,369,713
|
*Oppose It was a WWE Network special event - similar to Elimnation Chamber and Beast in the East - thus it's worthy of it's own article.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
674,384,105
|
` :I will review it. It is possible I might have conflated edit waring and vandalism. I will try to be more specific. `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
674,391,778
|
` ::The Talk page posts should not have been removed by Muboshgu, an involved party. I have enough evidence that is recruting people to attack my edits and make pointy reversions on my edits. I should not have been blocked for this just because I called him out instead of reporting him. `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
674,391,973
|
and if you reveiw the page history you'll find I made 3RR, Muboshgu made four, he is in violation of the 3RR, not me
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
674,403,080
|
` :::If it had been removed by someone besides who, if you'll simply review his edit history (specifically regaurding Hillaryland) has at the very least given me very good reason to suspect pointy editing practice if not outright meatpuppetry I would have let it be. As it was I thought he was simply trying to cover up the very suspicous activity associated with those edits and the same few people following him aroung and supporting him. `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
674,405,238
|
` == TOPick BANana == file:banana.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by `
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
674,414,365
|
` :I appreciate the advice, but my request included the truth and I feel I was justified. I would rather take the week long ban than lie to get out of it. I'm frustrated that I was banned after undoing 's reversion. I had no idea that a user was allowed to undo edits pointing out their own impropriety on a talk page. `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
674,416,262
|
== Season 3 == Any info if there will be a 3rd season? I love this tv series
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
674,416,442
|
` == Name == Is Junya his real birth name or adopted pseudonym? Because it sounds like a ghetto version of ``Junior``, but he is Japanese...? `
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
674,416,746
|
` == Hey dickhead Summerphd == Wtf is your problem? Why do you keep reverting my posts in the Talk sections? Example: in the Talk section of Junya Watanabe, i added a question whether ``Junya`` is his birth name or adopted pseudonym. This is relevant to an encyclopedia article, you insufferable asshole.`
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
674,417,191
|
== Season 3 == Any info if there will be a 3rd season?
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
674,417,411
|
== Kurt Cobain == This is the one Kurt Cobain suicided with
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
674,424,676
|
== Take It To Talk == You, the original author of this article, are unfit to present featured articles. Period. End of discussion.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
674,429,029
|
` == Irataba - Take it to Talk == I apologize for my unkind words on my last post to the talk page. I didn't really mean to come across that mean. You know the feeling I hope — ``heat of the moment``. Your article is great! Otherwise I wouldn't waste my time reading and editing it. Handshake? `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
674,434,542
|
` :: I have edited numerous, probably more than a dozen, FA articles in the past. My experience on FA's is that they are far easier to edit after they have been removed from the Main Page. Once out of the ``spotlight``, simple edits such as those I normally do aren't scrutinized so closely. Although, today with Irataba, I must admit I was extra bold—far bolder than I usually get with FAs. I am usually contented by correcting a typo or two. `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
674,451,454
|
2015 (UTC) :What is that in the bottom left corner? That doesn't look like a recognizable landmark. Also, why a white border, not black? 01:06, 4 August
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
674,456,057
|
` == AfC notification: Draft:Ben Cantelon has a new comment == I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ben Cantelon. Thanks! `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
674,461,543
|
== Hey dickhead Summerphd == Why are you such a disruptive, vindictive asshole? Why did you, for exmaple, revert the last edit on the gun used in suicide of Kurt Cobaine? It's a factoid relevant to the encyclopedia article on the gun. Fuck off
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
674,461,641
|
== Claim to fame == The only thing Christian Roth is known for is the Kurt Cobain sunglasses.
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
674,494,374
|
==Zurich Airport vandal== Hello HkCaGu, there is an anononymous user is continually vandalizing Zurich Airport. I ask you if you can do something paese, because after my and other user revision of his edits, he continue vandalizing the page.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
674,500,536
|
GA Review :This review is transcluded from Talk:Grenade (song)/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. Reviewer: ·
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
674,501,194
|
==ZRH vandal== Hello The Banner, there is an anononymous user is continually vandalizing Zurich Airport. I ask you if you can do something paese, because after my and other user revision of his edits, he continue vandalizing the page.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
674,501,943
|
==ZRH vandal== Hello Sjö, there is an anononymous user is continually vandalizing Zurich Airport. I ask you if you can do something paese, because after my and other user revision of his edits, he continue vandalizing the page.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
674,520,259
|
`Yes, case-sensitive. I have ``illegalknowledge`` and I am locked out. Any suggestions? Please email: wiki@IllegalKnowledge.com and thanks muchly.`
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
674,552,915
|
you cannot stop this legion so why bother trying?
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
674,553,275
|
this legion is impossible to stop
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
674,553,383
|
the nrysogim legion is impossible to stop
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
674,574,634
|
== Esteban Cambiasso again == Dear KylieTastic, Thank you for your reply to my query about why you accused me of making edits on a page that I had never even visited. Yes you are right I do access Wikipedia from the O2 UK mobile network. BUT - Wikipedia has now blocked EVERYONE using this network from making edits. This is crazy. I have NEVER done anything wrong or vandaliam on your site. I am a writer, and some time ago someone put completely incorrect information on one of your pages because they had completely mis-read one of my books. At that time I was able to edit and so was able to change the awful remarks of the idiot who had written them. But now I am blocked - through no fault of my own - and therefore if someone else does the same thing I am now unable to answer. This is terrible. What is Wikipedia doing? These blanket blocks are ridiculous and completely TOTALLY unfair.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
674,582,375
|
:Yes it's always best when we can do that, though sometimes other priorities intervene. It's nice we can work together as a wiki community. Thanks for following up.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
674,599,324
|
: Well thank you, always happy to talk to fans! I don't have a Wikipedia page 'cuz my band's not notable enough, but I'll sign an autograph as soon as possible! However, I don't believe I sing like Deryck Whiblily, but I guess it's all just a matter of personal opinion, right?
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
674,599,876
|
::: To be quite honest, we were going for a more 90s pop punk approach.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
674,629,196
|
` == Capitalization of ``King`` == There is no consistency with regard to when ``King`` is, or is not, capitalized. It seems to me that, without exception, ``King`` should be capitalized every single time in an article about a King. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
674,638,019
|
` :And that has to do?... Then we will appoint in the article all series dealing with drug traffickers as La Reina del Sur, Señora Acero, Camelia la Texana, Narcos, Ojo por ojo, La querida del Centauro. There are already categories for that. '''''' • '''' `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
674,672,549
|
` — Preceding unsigned comment added by `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
674,673,954
|
` I think we had a misunderstanding. (Some days I feel more than others that I am not a native speaker.) When I said eyes I meant eyes, don't think I wanted you to comment. Just look. What I see: I added to an article in good faith. Imagine: there were options to react. It could have been ignored, or thanked for, or discussed. Instead it was reverted. A sum of these reverts made the infoboxes case. But what would life be without without it ;) - Life is too short to continue that ``discussion``, with the one voice of objection, `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
674,679,773
|
August 2015 (UTC) Now he's basically saying he's gonna keep socking if he doesn't get his way. He expects you to referee between him and Dissident when he's already gotten enough WP:ROPE to hang Earth around the equator before getting blocked. This is just ridiculous. ⌉⌊ 13:09, 5
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
674,680,850
|
== Yogscast == I see u r a yogscast dick rider. F.Y.I it's not vandalism if it's true moron. So quit following me.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
674,681,276
|
== Get a life == Quit being the unofficial Wikipedia police and STOP following me. As this invades my privacy.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
674,681,620
|
== get lost == Stop following me Canadian loser. Go patrol something useful
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
674,692,840
|
. But if it's not clear that 51% support the content, then it has to stay out; exclusion is the default
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
674,702,264
|
`The article still is absolutely unclear. What do the brackets <.,.> mean? What is ``the article by Sussmann and Willems`` and why should we care that the given definition agrees with it? What is the brachystochrone problem? What are p and q, how do they relate to x and u? `
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
674,707,218
|
==Membership== The first sentence states the membership is unknown. The official bio for GE CEO Jeff Immelt, Dartmouth '78, states he is a member of Dragon. A correcting edit is needed by a knowledgeable editor.
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
674,723,166
|
Woogie10w is a scumbag and idiot Piss off and stop messaging me you bellend/
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
674,733,052
|
::::: I think the recent work done by Ssilvers in adding more references, slightly reorganizing the content and expanding the lead has improved the article greatly so that it is now at the standard required by Wikipedia.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
674,737,891
|
::: this is how you do it: ''vindula arsinoe'' sits on a leaf.]]. Explanation: :::* File:Butterfly vindula arsinoe.jpg is a link to where the image is that you want to insert. It looks something like: File:abc.png or File:foo.jpg. :::* thumb specifies how you want it to look. Thumb is normal. :::* alt=text is the alternative text used to describe the image when you can't see it. Like for people who use screen readers. :::* The [[butterfly]] ''vindula arsinoe'' sits on a leaf is the caption, or description. :::And this is how it looks: vindula arsinoe sits on a leaf.]] — /
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
674,738,461
|
Shut your mouth and stop talking. good boy
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
674,739,032
|
Listen yeah, don't' threaten me because you wont do nothing. Your useless and pointless and whats to stop me from doing doing it again.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.