dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
679,164,459	== Man u == http://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/season=2016/clubs/club=52682/squad/index.html there's your source	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
679,165,854	There is a substantial article on this topic in the 1984 The Encyclopedia of Ghosts by Daniel Cohen. It runs to around five pages of text, which I could, I guess, e-mail to anyone who sent me an e-mail. There is also a substantial article in the Guiley Encyclopedia of Ghosts and Spirits which I might be able to get by the weekend. Or, if anyone were interested, it might be possible to get those articles, and maybe more, from WP:RX. Anyway, if anyone wants at least the first article, drop me an e-mail. Alternately, if anyone wants me to contact RX, or chooses to contact them themselves, it would probably be a good idea to let others know the documents are available.	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
679,170,447	You know what I think? I think you should take your fancy Wiki and SHOVE IT.	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
679,170,594	` == You stupid S.O.B. == Stay away from my page, you are a sarcastic moron and a hypocrite. Don't try to advice myself regarding an minor incident, you are disturbing my self on an issue outside wikipedia, there are facts to be proven. Such hypocrites (like you) have no real reputation in real world, I'm acting on anti fascist and anti terrorist propaganda not from any extremist or bias perspective. I don't care how much you bother my self still there are methods to post on wikipedia without an account. However trolling is not a harmful action, different people has different p.o.v.s. Further on you P.S; Wikipedia is not something to be expanded through discussion or being bold. Literary it is an communication method of which leads others to overcome questions in real life or practice contemporary issues such as terrorism, politics or religious extremism. Although you have reverted my last edit on your talk page. That means you don't have a real points to be discussed except condemning my self and dissing. Fuck you hypocrite. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	true
679,184,231	`:::::Thank you so much , it's a delightful interaction with you. The coding is like a rubics cube or one of those snake-folding puzzles - a lot of staring and slowing down looking at one character at a time.... yes I see what you mean, and that does seem like a handy way to keep the article concise without strings of numbers on the heavier-referenced parts. I was thinking what refn\| means... ``ref encapsulate``... not sure I'm going to use that from now on because it's so much cleaner.... ex. {refn\|, the best cars are fun to drive }} `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
679,204,813	== Archives == Why does the Archive Box at the top right stop at March 2011? What is I want to see some archived discussions after that date? Where do I go? Thanks.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
679,207,498	`*Neutral Initially I proposed deleting the section, when I created the ``Remove all supposed tweets of Ayatollah Khamenei`` thread above. However, after so masterfully reorganized the section, I'm not advocating for its removal anymore. Also, today Iranian semi-official Fars News Agency published an article, which contained quotes of Khamenei, including one in which he calls for full annihilation and destruction of the Zionist regime: ``Only way to solve this problem is full annihilation and destruction of the Zionist regime``. This quote is from a speech he gave in 2014. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
679,211,399	:As indicated by User Ism schism earlier, see Wikipedia:Reliable sources and undue weight, and self-revert you edit.	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
679,222,546	==Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 September 2#Katrina Richardson== Since you created one of the redirects (Catherine Smith) mentioned as an example, the above discussion may be of interest.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
679,223,140	:::::::::If you think Mondoweiss has an agenda, explain us why, based on sources, reknown, reputation or clear mistakes or false reports from them coming from sources with a higher standard. That's easy too (or primary sources in which they denounce themselves.) If the only argument is that they are on the left, like Ha'aretz, we cannot anything for you. :::::::::	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
679,231,036	Whatever you say. But I always have backup.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
679,235,057	` * ``Distorted``? That's just a wide-angle shot. `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
679,250,882	:::Reread the thread on Jared Diamond. We don't use him. You have failed to grasp that the objection is not to the fact that the late world ecological change rendered all countries in the northern hemisphere more ertile, etc., but to the silliness of the phrasing ('fostered human development' sounds like a phrase straight out of a pop psychology book.) :::Improved ecological conditions following the last ice age facilitated population growth and a flowering of culture. ref Mark Griffiths, The Lotus Quest: In Search of the Sacred Flower, Random House, 2011 pp.144-146	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
679,264,420	` You have no current ``relationship`` with Rene, nor ANY contact for years; your past history is not relevant NOW, as you pass yourself off as ``knowing`` him and presume to speak for him. I am no mere ``acquaintance`` - my friendship with Rene spans decades, and pre-dates your supposed involvement, so don't presume to lecture me - ``gossip`` you say? Nonsense! Pointing out the true stance of the situation is always preferable to deception; you don't like the fact you were called out on it. Also, your attack, on whom I can only presume is some unsuspecting woman, is so off base as to be amusing. You presume to know who I am; sorry to disappoint, you do not... `	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
679,274,187	:::::::::::I repeat if you think Mondoweiss has an agenda, explain us why, based on sources, reknown, reputation or clear mistakes or false reports from them coming from sources with a higher standard. :::::::::::If you don't answer this question, I think we should not try to discuss with you.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
679,276,110	::::OK, I added topics and refs. I think this should suffice, and you can restore the page.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
679,276,293	:The information can be found in the following Israeli sources :* Benny Morris, 1948. The First Arab-Israeli War, Yale University Press. :* Yoav Gelber, 1948 Palestine War, Sussex Academic Press. :If you are interested to undersand the '48 war I suggest you the 1st one from which you can have all details.	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
679,276,740	` :I share the idea that ``claimed by the State of Palestine`` is the right wording. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
679,291,328	REDIRECT Talk:2015 CONCACAF Cup	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
679,305,581	In response to you VANDALISM with allegation Keep it NEUTRAL read first the official Congressional Record Wikipedia is NOT the source of rumors, bias or propaganda! It MUST be credible! http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CREC-1998-10-20/html/CREC-1998-10-20-pt1-PgE2244-2.htm] Congressional Record Government Publishing Office / Congressional Record Volume 144, Number 150 (Tuesday, October 20, 1998)	2,015	false	user	blocked	dev	false
679,306,761	` :Do you think ``Pluto2012 Encyclopaedia`` is WP:RS ? :I am sure not. :That's nearly as worse for Ariel encyclopaedia. : `	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
679,309,558	==DYK nomination of Rai Simons== Hello! Your submission of Rai Simons at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
679,311,684	` :::The charge of the proof is for the one who brings information. :::What is ``Ariel encyclopaedia`` ? ::: `	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
679,312,142	::::The source is not +972. The source is Michel Waelbroeck.	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
679,318,896	` ::: Completely oppose this. We have little information about the religion of polytheistic pre-Islamic Arabs except the Meccans. And also we have even much more little information about the pre-Islamic Arabic Jews and Christians and especially the Hanifs and such a small amount of information won't be enough to create a separate article for them. I don't see any problem with this article. I don't see any reason to separate it. :::: Also I'm not trying to be offensivr but please don't keep saying ``Cheers`` again and again. Hope you don't mind but it's kind of annoying. Thanks. `	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
679,324,253	` No, what ``offends me`` is the WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT I'm seeing from you, and your overall conduct. You came into a discussion to object to a removal. You didn't even know enough to understand my comment, which anyone else would. I go to your linked article, which was changed from a redirect changed by and consists of nothing but non-RS material added by a known POV editor, and you revert it. Therefore, since your point of view was not being accepted, now somebody was trying to hide something and everyone has a COI. You're also assuming said COI, why? Because Blueboar works in a position where he'd have access to sources? That's not a COI, that's called WP:EXPERT. You assumed no AGF from the get-go, and I'm no longer doing so either. Sometimes people are more knowledgeable in an area than you, and you just need to accept that. `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
679,329,006	` :Hi StevenJ81. Thank you. I correct this. (I think I meant ``background``) `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
679,348,509	: I can't find any source in English that says more about him other than the fact that he's a deputy minister of Iran, some sources do state his views though. I wouldn't mind if you delete the article or nominate it for deletion. Thanks you and best regards,	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
679,360,183	` == A barnstar for you! == {\| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` \|rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` \| \|style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` \| The Admin's Barnstar \|- \|style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` \| Thank you! \|}`	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
679,379,670	== Copy of note == As I replied to you on your account: While there are many articles about companies on Wikipedia, they all meet the notability guidelines for inclusion on Wikipedia. Your articles have been repeated deleted because they have not established why your company is notable enough for inclusion or has been purely promotional as seen by the SEO keywords you have been using in your article titles. You have stated in your requests to keep the article, you are the CEO of the company. Therefore, you have a clear conflict of interest regarding any articles you create about the company. You need to read Wikipedia's Business' FAQ before you continue to edit. Finally, you have been editing Wikipedia under three different accounts now. All have been used to promote and/or write about your company. You may only edit Wikipedia using a single account. If you create additional accounts, they will be blocked from editing. I have left your original account, , unblocked and you may continue to edit using that account. However, if you resume creating any more articles about your company, you will be blocked from editing.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
679,398,077	::I swear I added the needs-infobox when updating. I figured that given it would build the correct version with only PROJECT that it was redundant, and not required to include the other two. Seems odd to me to have that stuff. I'll look at the main template and see if the parameters need removed there. Seriously, I swear I added the needs-infobox, maybe I'm going nuttier than I realized.	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
679,409,669	== Blocking == Can any Administrator help block this person? He or she is a vandal and has also reverted many of my edits. This is the IP address>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/105.235.128.209 Thank you.	2,015	false	article	blocked	dev	false
679,414,977	Block me you self-righteous cunt. Do you really have nothing better to do with your time than act as some sort of internet police? You really are utterly pathetic. I'll just make a new account anyway. Sucks to be you I guess.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
679,459,999	::Articles should showcase quality. And all articles that do this should have a shot at being on the front page. This comes up a lot but I don't see the problem...	2,015	false	article	random	train	false
679,468,680	` :::If it occurred long before shooting started and had no impact on the finished film, cast and crew turnover is not important enough to mention in the lead. No response to removing the line about Goddard left as director to pursue another directing opportunity. Your last statement gives no response to what I said about ``The U.S. production`` vs ``American``. Fox not merely financing or distributing is entirely consistent with the film being ``American``. - `	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
679,474,510	== Uma Thurman == Hello, Noreplyhaha! If you'd like to make a case for undoing my edits to the Uma Thurman entry, I'd love to know what your reasons are. I think my edits are all justified for the reasons I stated in the comments, and I will be re-entering them unless there is an important reason not to.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
679,482,417	` :This article was neutral. You, however, have are deleting relevant points such as ``Meanwhile, the Committee to Save Cooper Union and the office of the New York Attorney General (OAG) began building a lawsuit against the board of trustees, launching what it called “an exhaustive investigation into the many missteps on the part of the Board of Trustees, as well as Presidents George Campbell and Jamshed Bharucha and others, over the course of the last 10 years.” The OAG stated that its account included “many of the risky schemes, misrepresentations, and poor governance practices that created the current crisis.. In the fall of 2015, the Attorney General's office and the Committee to Save Cooper Union announced that the proposed lawsuit had been settled, and that the OAG would be filing a consent decree signed by the board, along with a cy pres petition with provisions for returning the school to a sustainable, tuition-free policy, increasing board transparency, adding additional student and alumni trustees, independent financial monitoring, and a search committee to identify the next full-term president. While this did not have an immediate effect on tuition policies, the signed decree and petition signaled a de facto victory for the case of the students and faculty who advocated for a continuation of the school’s original tuition-free policy.`` I have posted an explicit warning to your talkpage . If you continue deleting relevant points from this article and editing to include tired and untrue narratives, you will be banned. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
679,485,174	` : didn't try to explain his ``refugee crisis`` edit on the talk page after multiple undo's. Only later came up with a source that substantiates nothing. The IP 37.76.11.111 was me (I did not care to log in for a mere undo) but not 37.76.42.195. It's not only me in Hungary interested in AND AFFECTED DIRECTLY by this crisis who think in the same way about it. Furthermore i would like to COMPLAIN ABOUT THE CLEAR BIAS of towards The New York Times bordering on BRAND BUILDING: not cites almost EXCLUSIVELY The NYT, but insist on MENTIONING IT BY NAME in the lead section of the article. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
679,485,456	Thank you, I wish you a good work for that. Despite that however more important it's to find the match stats. of it against Monaco won 7-1, it's only one which is missing currently.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
679,487,371	` : A responsible editor should strive to cite sources that are reasonbly assumed to have first hand knowledge and unbiased reportage of a situation and strive to cite not only one source. seems more like having an agenda of pushing The NYT and the idea of ``refugee crisis`` into forefront. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
679,493,013	:Why don't you mention it? (no offence meant) I don't think this questions the neutrality of the article as a whole.	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
679,501,578	` == Migrants and refugees == A refugee is, according to the 1951 Refugee Convention, any person who ``owing to a well-founded fear`` of persecution is outside their country of nationality and ``unable`` or ``unwilling`` to seek the protection of that country. To gain the status, one has to go through the legal process of claiming asylum. The 1951 Refugee Convention: http://www.unhcr.org/pages/49da0e466.html As soon as someone fleeing persecution and mortal danger gets into a country where he/she is no longer persecuted but still caries on ``fleeing`` without invitation by a third country, he/she is no longer a refugee but a migrant. The only real refugees in Europe Schengen Area are Lybian citizens whose country is a direct neighbour to the Schengen Area.`	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
679,504,081	::If these people are refugees fleeing persecution and not economic migrants, why aren't they willing to stop in Italy, France, Austria, Hungary, Serbia, Bulgaria, Greece, Turkey? All are democratic and peacful countries.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
679,506,123	:::: If you would care to serach: MIGRANT CRISIS BBCWSJFinancial TimesThe TelegraphCNNUSA TodayThe Economist	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
679,506,608	. I'm not questioning that there are refugees among all these people, I'm arguing against calling it a European refugee crisis.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
679,513,064	and did not try to explain his stance on the Talk page in either case	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
679,520,266	I deleted the old conversations but they are archived. Why'd you delete my comment on your wall?	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
679,520,905	own advice and stop deleting things	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
679,523,154	`, 5 September 2015 (UTC) ::Since appears to be the ranking wikipedia admin let's welcome him to this conversation. I have deleted one of the old threads relating to an old npov tag that existed prior to this section: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooper_Union_financial_crisis_and_tuition_protests#CU_Administration_views . Since Epstein is now gone, his opinion doesn't matter. Chris Chamberlain, Richard Lincer and Bill Mea are the 3 ranking Administrators who would be able to comment on whether they consider the financial deficit to still be a ``Crisis`` 02:24`	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
679,547,274	:I'll ask the Academy of Korean Studies for the information on the next working day(7th, Sep, 2015) regarding citing its online version of Encyclopedia of Korean Culture, if you find it necessary.	2,015	false	user	random	train	false
679,555,264	` == Proposed amendment to WP:ADMIN regarding paid editing == You recently commented on . A concrete proposal to amend the administrator policy to this effect has been made at Wikipedia talk:Administrators#Proposed change - 'No paid editing`` for admins. Your comments would be appreciated. `	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
679,558,108	I have to vandalize them because they lost heavily to UAE 10-0	2,015	false	user	random	train	false
679,559,451	I would also like to ask, do you regularly spend your time on Heidegger and other philosophy articles, or have you only proceeded because of your harassment of me? I am in the process of improving this article as we speak (and as you waste one of your better's time with your childish games). What precisely are you doing?	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
679,564,654	== A case has been brought against you on ANI == Cheers, good friend!	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
679,567,478	Also, as a far better example of a decent lead with an appropriate length for an article of such high-importance, take a look at Immanuel Kant. Thank you for pointing Freud my way. I will try to fix that travesty as soon as I have time. Freud deserves a longer lead than this site bestows on reality television stars.	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
679,567,591	I am trying to be civil, but what could be more uncivil than a mass delete? I would consider an insult far more civil.	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
679,568,203	Bare Behind Bars? You gave me a level 2 warning, what the fuck is that all about... You one of these power drunk admins?	2,015	false	user	blocked	dev	true
679,569,494	` Imagine finding an article in which every single word is wrong and you will imagine my pain at reading the current Martin Heidegger article. Nor am I the only one who thinks this. Please see the section immediately above this article. Or better yet, spend the next 24 hours reading the first sections of Sein und Zeit and you will see the ridiculousness of the article as it currently stands, which demonstrates no understanding of Heidegger, and leaves everyone who reads it dumber than when they began and knowing less about everything. This is so atrocious that essentially the entire article as it stands needs to be deleted and began again. I have no more time for this. I tried to move the Dreyfus to the main article and now apparently all the material is destroyed. Do you have any comprehension of how bad this article currently is? One would have no idea that Heidegger was ever read anywhere outside of France from the current article. No summaries of Heidegger's important concepts are given. No understanding of any of Heidegger's ideas are conveyed. Since you have decided to destroy my work, you can keep your poor article, which reads as if it was machine-translated from a foreign language. You do not even let someone in the middle of working finish before you destroy their work. No wonder zero academics contribute to this site and your articles are so atrocious. Anyone who reads the article as it currently stands comes away knowing less about Heidegger than they did before because of all of the obvious distortions and gross inaccuracies. You have not even succesfully explained a single one of Heidegger's terms or concepts here, or why anyone should care who he is. This article is an embarassment indeed. Words are important rather than space on the screen because people have different size screens. I have a 27 inch screen and a 5 inch screen, both of which I edit on. The lead is the same amount of words on both screens, but not the same number of ``screens`` for two different users. Word counts give a reasonable approximation of length not dependent on the particularities of users devices, fonts, and other non-content formatting. Generally, essays list word limits not page limits so page limits aren't just fudged with font changes and others. — Preceding unsigned comment added by • `	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
679,569,984	`Who cares about indenting and signing and other wikilawyering rules when you have a high importance article so filled with falsehoods that everyone who reads it comes away knowing less than they did before they read the article? Embarassment is not even a strong enough word for what a farce this article this. The lead is hardly even the worst part. You list ``influence and reception in France`` as if only the French ever Heidegger, to name just the most ridiculous error here. I was in the middle of trying to fix this and you block the page in order to ``win`` rather than work with me to make constructive improvements to an article that is in desperate need of new content, since almost everything currently in there needs to be deleted because it is a distroting misrepresentation and makes no logical sense. Sad to see you all care more about ``winning`` than improving the article or having an encylopedic article on a major philosopher that does not actively contribute to vulgar misconceptions about him, and that actively spreads ignorance, and reads like a machine-translated piece of vandalism. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
679,570,333	` RandyKitty, none of these ``collaborators`` did anything. I welcome their collaboration! Let them add a single line, or even delete a line that they think is unimportant! Mass deleting is not a ``collaboration`` and you are abusing language to make your point. I am the only one who collaborated on here. Take a look at the record, and you shall see I collaborated with at least 4 other editors before 2 ``collaborators`` (who are collaborators in the sense that the French were collaborators with Hitler) simply mass deleted contributions, rather than selectively keeping what they liked or approved of. Please stop abusing language. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
679,570,514	` Interesting to see yet another Wikipedia contributor more interested in showing off the deep knowledge of their WIkipedia J.D. degree rather than improving a page with more falsehoods and distortions than I can count. This is almost certainly the worst page on Wikipedia, although that abortion of the Sigmund Freud page I was just shown as an example of a ``good`` page comes rather close. Am I the only one here with eyes? `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
679,570,939	::::::: It looks like a country article, which is basically dishonest.	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
679,571,263	Rather than someone explain everything they have learneed in their 3 years of Wikipedia Law School, how about anyone defend the outright abortion and spreading of ignorance of the current page? Disgusting. I had thought people wanted to come here to spread knowledge, instead they wish to rise to arbitrary positions of power and abuse that power to show how tough they are. You have all conducted yourselves in a truly outrageous and shameful manner. Learn the rules of Wikipedia? How about you show that you actually care about the article not being less accurate than a piece of toilet paper with which I have just used to wipe my ass? If this article was written by a speaker fluent in English, I will eat my hat.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
679,572,768	` Randy, I am not apologizing to you for an obvious joke, so you will have to somehow manage to go on without one. What is truly outrageous is how little you care about the ``embarrassing`` state of the article (not my words, but those of several editors above), but you care a great deal about making sure there are indents, and tildes, and every one of your trite, nonsensical, kangarroo-court rules has been followed. I am sure your mother is very proud of your Wikipedia J.D. law degree, but you are not getting any more of my time to contribute to your project and correct your obvious falsehoods and text that does not clearly appear to have been written by an English speaker familiar with Heidegger and able to name even a few of his main concepts. Please point me to the place in the article where even one of H's primary philosophical concepts are reasonably explained, so that a reader may have any idea of what he is after. The current page leaves everyone less intelligent and knowledgeable than they were before reading it. I promise you, that you are not getting even one minute more of my time in any event. This article is so bad that it needs to be gone through paragraph by paragraphy and replaced my new content. Nearly every paragraph in it leaves the reader knowing less true things about Heidegger than the reader knew before. If you would like to actually know something about Heidegger, read the article I wrote. I managed to explain in the lead the main ideas which one needs to know about Heidegger. The current article does not even succesfully explain Heidegger's thought or his importance within the entire article, and inculcates a number of gross and vulgar misconceptions. It would be almost impossible to imagine a philosophy article that was filled with more sophmoric drivel, and reads like a machine-translated text of an undergraduate who has never read the author, and wishes to spread as much misinformation as possible. If you prefer reading an article that seems to claim that Heidegger has only been read in France and is unable to successfully name or explain EVEN A SINGLE ONE OF HEIDEGGER'S CONCEPTS, please by all means, waste your time on doing so. I am finished with this. Adieu. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
679,573,025	` That might be the single dumbest thing I have ever read. Is this editor intellectually disabled? Does he have any actual idea what the word ``argument`` means? `	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
679,573,829	` Here, from the talk page, three other editors confirming my judgment of just how ``embarassing`` the current article is, and which contributes to the common conception among academics that Wikipedia is primarily written by intellectually disabled kindergartners and high-school dropouts on a power-trip: 'm sorry but the introduction is an embarrassingly crass articulation of what Heidegger's project is about. It is embarrassing and needs to be fixed! I agree, especially with sources. From what I understand of Heidegger, the three paragraphs in the introduction are roughly accurate, but they require edits to become smooth and easily understandable. But most importantly, there are no references!! I find the biography and following subjects are for the most part thoroughly cited, but the intro is not? I will keep my eye out for references, but anyone who is knowledgable and wellread on the subject should consider adding references to the introduction. Jdanbeck (talk) I'd say the second paragraph is inaccurate, and in fact absolute nonsense. It neither reflects Heidegger's position, nor is coherent in itself. There used to be a decent intro. Revert to it? KD Tries Again (talk) KD Tries Again And then, have a look at the fact that 4 editors supported me, before a single WIKILAWYER arrived at the scene, to mass delete. How exactly can I ``lose`` an argument about Heidegger by calling you Hitler? Whether or not you or I or anyone is an idiot or a Nazi or whatever has no reflection on whether or not the current article ACTIVELY SPREADS MISINFORMATION, as I have repeatedly stated and showed. Goodbye. I hope someday you all have the experience of reading Heidegger, as it is an electrifying experience which I hope no one will deny themselves due to this abortion of a 3rd grader's Wikipage. Truly sad to see how little you actually care about your pages being informative, true, or approrpriate to their topic's importance. Despicable, in fact. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
679,574,407	` Q: ``Name a Heideggerian concept the Current Wikipedia Article on Martin Heidegger successfully explains...`` A: ``There is none.```	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
679,593,296	` : Good catch - I just checked the credits and you're right that he's credited on character design. However, he doesn't seem to be the one who designed Samus according to the page you linked. Also, in the credits, it's listed like this (with this spacing): CHARACTER DESIGNED BY KIYOTAKE NEW MATSUOKA SHIKAMOTO :...which suggests he didn't have a primary/lead role - enemy design perhaps. He's still contradicted by the director/co-creator/fellow character designer though. But this is an important point, so thank you for making the correction. `	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
679,602,012	:Yea, if you want to go round tidying up your pal's mess good luck to you. Happy editing.	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
679,642,555	: I restored the logo per Template:Infobox video game#General fields (plus the screenshot is already used below the infobox). Happy editing!	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
679,645,648	You love the devil and worship him.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
679,666,696	:Typical ip playing, but stopped now ... roll on )	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
679,674,046	Interesting theory, detective. But who can say who anyone is really? What criterion of personal identity are we employing here? In any event , don't you think your time might be more profitably spent fixing the broken Heidegger page, in which I have already informed you and demonstrated, all but two of the sentences in the lead are guilty of errors of fact or interpretation? And which grossly distorrts the importance of the Heidegger-nazi episode? Why not pick your head out of your ass and fix the fucking articles instead of playing Cowboys and Indians or hardy boys or whatever masturabtory fantasy you are engaged in here? good night old friends!	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	true
679,679,607	`::I believe you work for the correction department of wikipedia user policy investigators. I hope to participate undoubtedly on that issue regarding my alternative account. Carry on. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
679,695,711	== Requesting Protection == This article needs to be protected, as it's inevitably going to be a frequent target for vandals from 4chan's /pol/ board due to the fact that cartoonist and /pol/ meme Ben Garrison lives here.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
679,703,474	:There was no edit warring, ! We were discussing along the reverts to reach consensus!	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
679,704,302	::: Alright, but what's so bad when those good-faith reverts could help us reach a consensus? Anyway, I take note of that for future disputes.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
679,706,832	It's not hard to make and educated guess as to what that decision might be, as Roof has already confessed to the killings and stated that his goal was to start a race war , but it's not our place to second-guess the courts.	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
679,715,845	` == Redirect from hoax page ``Hamlet of Denmark`` == Hello ! I just wanted to point out that the redirect that you created from Hamlet of Denmark should point to Prince Hamlet (which is the article dedicated to the character) and not to Hamlet. Best regards! * I thought about it, but the play also has King Hamlet, the ghost. (I have no preference either way; if you believe Prince Hamlet would have been a better target, I might reduce the protection for a while, so that you can change it.) - :* Well, I confess that I have absolutely no idea about how to find whether people who search for ``Hamlet of Denmark`` are more interested in the prince or in the king. I would say the prince, but it would be only a conjecture. Given the ambiguous nature of the expression, your choice seems the most reasonable. Sorry if I didn't give a better thought on it before contacting you. Cheers! == Why my page has been deleted? == I want to know what was wrong about the last page i've created: Making Sense. I want to republish it, what do I have to change? Thanks. == Jewish Supremacism (My Awakening to the Jewish Question) == Hi @Mike Rosoft: please explain where the text is promotion of the book and the ideas contained in the book? In the first time is better that define the portion of text that had problem. : Considering the draft presents a hateful and insane conspiracy theory by a white supremacist as if it were factual? Hi @Ian.thomson: Please talk about Wikipedia rules and do not tell insult word. I say that this is not a valid reason for speed deletion. The admin must stated it in talk page until solved. @Mike Rosoft:Please reply to my question. Do is G11 rule in speed deletion? :The draft presented lies by a known conspiracy theorist as ``meticulously research.`` To call that promotional is better than that deserves. :WP:G11 says that ``Unambiguous advertising or promotion`` is to be speedily deleted. The lies David Duke wrote were promoted as ``meticulously research.`` @Ian.thomson: You have a personal problem with this book and the idea of the author. Please observe the rules and don't tell loose talk. This is your idea about this book that is a lies but many people in the world are against to your idea. I decided to edit this subject and submit in this page. @Mike Rosoft: In the content and purpose of book sections, I selected and wrote several sentence from this book. So, I think some people had against idea with it. I want introduce this book just and i had not any goal. please explain about text and say where have problem? * already explained to you what was wrong with the article; so did I on your talk page. The article largely repeats the claims made by the book as a fact. And if an article about a books starts by calling it ``a meticulously research`` [sic], it starts wrong. See the policy of neutrality and ``What Wikipedia is not``. - : I can change this sentence and remove this adverb. Can you restore this page until fix this section? * No, I am not going to restore the article. In any case, I didn't delete it because of a minor grammar error; I deleted it because it promoted the book and its ideas. Even removing the sentence in question wouldn't change the fact. As far I am concerned, there is nothing to discuss here; if you still believe that the article shouldn't have been deleted, please go to deletion review. - * This is a important book in the world about Jewish people but not all Jewish people. This book said about the people that have Supremacism act. Therefore, you must think about introduction of book and help to fix it not delete it. please restore it until edit it. * Hey, I write again about this subject and publish it but you can not delete my draft page. You have self interest with this book. I solve this problem and publish this subject again. :: Actually read the article David Duke. Notice that he's known as ``white nationalist, conspiracy theorist,`` and ``advocate of antisemitic conspiracy theories.`` That means that he believes that white people are superior to everyone else so his claims about anyone else being supremacist are going to be lies. He's also a conspiracy theorist, so his claims about history and sociology are going to be lies, too. He's also an antisemite, so anything he writes about Jews are going to be lies, too. Just because he quoted the Talmud does not mean he quoted it in context. If you refuse to understand this, I will go to WP:ANI and see if we can arrange a topic ban for you. Mike and I are not the ones with a personal problem here. * I read the Duke website and many part of his book but I tried to stated and introduced the book not Duke's idea. Therefore, I edited the text and try again until introduce the book not Duke's idea. :: You're still calling it ``influential,`` downplaying the fact that Duke is a notorious conspiracy theorist and white supremacist, and claiming ``Jewish Supremacism must be authentic.`` I'm going to the administrator's noticeboard to request a topic ban because you obviously have a bias supporting the book's hateful lies. EDIT: I've made the thread. ::Mike, I've mentioned you in the ANI thread ``Topic ban on Jews and Judaism needed for AliAkar``. == Store Twenty One == Hello there. I was going to create Store Twenty One, but discovered that it had previously existed and had been removed deleted by yourself (I think). The notice suggested that I contact the administrator who deleted the page. Store Twenty One has about 200 shops in the UK and c.£100m annual turnover and I think is fairly notable chain on the British high street. I wanted to read up on it and was surprised no page existed. Is it possible to see the version of the page that previously existed? I might be able to add more useful content. Thanks. * I have restored the article, but it's almost devoid of content. - ==Copyright of government works== Hi @Mike Rosoft: Thanks for your attention to this matter. If we and also administrator of the website don't know the copyright holder of a photo, what should we do for upload this photo in commons? == Hi == how do I revert edit? I notice some vandalisms. Thanks. Also, how do I redirect a page? Thanks, it worked! ==N game== What do you think about an image I added on an N game article, since it wasn't illustrated? ([[User talk:The N	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
679,716,247	entitled to remove the comment which I have done so leave it be.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
679,716,562	There is a user by the name of Mike Rosoft who is a dirty prick whom I do not like. If you see him, tell him to stay the hell off my page!	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
679,719,965	why on earth would I want to edit your page?	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
679,721,101	I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
679,721,926	THE WIKIPEDIA TWATBAGS!	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
679,729,195	' :bismarck is portrayed as a culprit and the catholic church as a victim Wait, are you suggesting here that Bismarck, who boasted how he wants to exterminate whole nation he hates, is the victim here? Please explain your sentence.	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
679,731,268	Since ethnicity is hot-topic for greek editors, it shall be separate not to disrupt the whole text.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
679,738,550	` Hi, I also have an another project for a very advanced keyboard that allow to write any languages with same configuration and would like to work with Logitech on this project. Because since we use lot script in my life and in Macedonia (Cyrril, Latin, Greek, Arab), the standard keyboard that we use now based The Remington typewriter of C. L. Sholes. is to limitative and to simple and now allow to write phonetic, subscript / superscript, minuscule capital, and some special character like the non‑breaking hypen ``‧⁠``(U+2027 + U+2060) or non‑breaking minus ``‑`` (U+2011), also I would like to add mathematical minus ``−`` (U+2212) to numeric pad instead of only ``-`` (U+002C). Also it is possible to change the unicode script easily, and to see the change with LCD touch / key. The vision that I have for keyboard is very good. Please help to make it U.S.A... Help me, for this other project. `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
679,738,735	== Propose to merge the main national article with the results article == Basing also in latest additions by and about my opinion, I propose that it would be better to merge this article with Albania national football team results into the section History, because every national football team here has it own history at the main article.	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
679,738,967	Basing also in latest additions by and about my opinion, I propose that it would be better to merge this article with the main artcile of Albania national football team into the section History, because every national football team here has it own history at the main article.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
679,739,013	Proposing to merge this article with the main artcile of Albania NFT	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
679,739,812	` :::I'm being blocked for comments that I made months ago? And I was no more ``uncivil`` than several Wikipedia admins - like , for example - regularly are. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
679,751,750	You have pointed out problematic editing about this	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
679,762,028	` == Promotion of economic pseudoscience with obvious contradiction on ``money creation`` page. == It is absurd that two things that are in fact opposites describe one FACT - how money is created. Just because a topic is ``well sourced`` does not mean ANYTHING. The ``mainstream`` theory is the accurate one. I am extremely disappointed in constant reporting on quack ``theory`` and promotion of pseudoscience by yourself. `	2,015	false	user	blocked	dev	false
679,764,943	== Reserve Requirements == What does reserve requirements are a myth mean? They are not. There really are reserve requirements. You are confused. Go read an economics textbook.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
679,767,400	` Cheers. But there is only one point of view on money creation. There is no debate - can't be. So if I find sources that ``prove`` money is dropped by storks it can added as an ``alternative view``?? You are abusing NPOV.`	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
679,768,168	Saying that Largoplazo only nominated the article for deletion because of deletionist tendencies is hardly uncivil and is entirely valid considering that he just nominated the article for deletion again, even AFTER I added more sources to it. He's clearly aiming to take advantage of the fact that I can't currently edit the Articles for deletion page to defend the article, which is patently childish and uncivil behavior. For example, if I were capable of editing the Articles for deletion page that he just created, I would note that the film has been covered in all sorts of notable sources, like: http://explore.bfi.org.uk/4ce2b78523a6f - British Film Institute http://www.villagevoice.com/film/tuli-kupferberg-is-god-and-a-shoulda-been-cult-hit-finally-gets-its-ny-premiere-6429111 - The Village Voice https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/store/movies/voulez-vous-coucher-avec-god/8d6kgwzl5h7h - Microsoft https://itunes.apple.com/gb/movie/voulez-vous-coucher-avec-god/id645402033 - iTunes https://www.iffr.com/en/films/voulez-vous-coucher-avec-god/ - International Film Festival Rotterdam https://books.google.com/books?id=1GCX5KQ0JXoC&pg;=PT190&dq;=%22Voulez-vous+coucher+avec+God%22&hl;=en&sa;=X&ved;=0CDYQ6AEwBWoVChMI_qekx_jixwIViJMeCh0VmglK#v=onepage&q;=%22Voulez-vous%20coucher%20avec%20God%22&f;=false - Buenos Aires International Festival of Independent Cinema ...to name just a few. I would also point out that several notable people were involved with the film, like the VERY notable Tuli Kupferberg, who stars in it. But I can't edit the page because I'm blocked right now, and he nominated the article for deletion again only after you blocked me - because he wanted to make sure I couldn't edit the Articles for deletion page. That kind of behavior is far more damaging to the encyclopedia than anything that I said to him.	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
679,772,308	` Rob, how does money creation work then? Either the ``alternate theory`` is correct or it is bollocks. Which one is correct? Delete the wrong one. If you don't I think I will edit as I please ;) `	2,015	false	user	blocked	dev	false
679,773,605	== Economics is religion == THANK YOU. For proving my point. Economics is religion not science! Money creation is metaphysical! Twat.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
679,775,869	:*Reviewing admin, please note violated the spirit of Wikipedia:Edit_warring#The_three-revert_rule by deleting the edits of 3 different users at Cooper Union financial crisis and tuition protests. He did so not 1, not 2, not 3, but 4 times over the course of a few days. I honestly did not realize outing was against policy, so I apologize for violating policy by outing on wiki and will never do so again. But please ensure Beyond My Ken stops his disruptive behavior at Cooper Union financial crisis and tuition protests. He also deleted relevant discussion both on his talk page (technically acceptable) and a relevant query from the Cooper Union financial crisis and tuition protests talk page. Requesting that the top 3 Current Admins' views be added to the article inside of a talk page is not a discussion that should have been deleted by , even if I technically failed to archive his old threads properly.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
679,777,389	: It reads like someone who doesn't speak English very well misquoted Christopher Bruce's Dictionary of Arthurian Names. I fixed the language and added a ref.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false

679,164,459

== Man u == http://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/season=2016/clubs/club=52682/squad/index.html there's your source

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

679,165,854

There is a substantial article on this topic in the 1984 The Encyclopedia of Ghosts by Daniel Cohen. It runs to around five pages of text, which I could, I guess, e-mail to anyone who sent me an e-mail. There is also a substantial article in the Guiley Encyclopedia of Ghosts and Spirits which I might be able to get by the weekend. Or, if anyone were interested, it might be possible to get those articles, and maybe more, from WP:RX. Anyway, if anyone wants at least the first article, drop me an e-mail. Alternately, if anyone wants me to contact RX, or chooses to contact them themselves, it would probably be a good idea to let others know the documents are available.

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

679,170,447

You know what I think? I think you should take your fancy Wiki and SHOVE IT.

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

679,170,594

` == You stupid S.O.B. == Stay away from my page, you are a sarcastic moron and a hypocrite. Don't try to advice myself regarding an minor incident, you are disturbing my self on an issue outside wikipedia, there are facts to be proven. Such hypocrites (like you) have no real reputation in real world, I'm acting on anti fascist and anti terrorist propaganda not from any extremist or bias perspective. I don't care how much you bother my self still there are methods to post on wikipedia without an account. However trolling is not a harmful action, different people has different p.o.v.s. Further on you P.S; Wikipedia is not something to be expanded through discussion or being bold. Literary it is an communication method of which leads others to overcome questions in real life or practice contemporary issues such as terrorism, politics or religious extremism. Although you have reverted my last edit on your talk page. That means you don't have a real points to be discussed except condemning my self and dissing. Fuck you hypocrite. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

true

679,184,231

`:::::Thank you so much , it's a delightful interaction with you. The coding is like a rubics cube or one of those snake-folding puzzles - a lot of staring and slowing down looking at one character at a time.... yes I see what you mean, and that does seem like a handy way to keep the article concise without strings of numbers on the heavier-referenced parts. I was thinking what refn| means... ``ref encapsulate``... not sure I'm going to use that from now on because it's so much cleaner.... ex. {refn|, the best cars are fun to drive }} `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

679,204,813

== Archives == Why does the Archive Box at the top right stop at March 2011? What is I want to see some archived discussions after that date? Where do I go? Thanks.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

679,207,498

`*Neutral Initially I proposed deleting the section, when I created the ``Remove all supposed tweets of Ayatollah Khamenei`` thread above. However, after so masterfully reorganized the section, I'm not advocating for its removal anymore. Also, today Iranian semi-official Fars News Agency published an article, which contained quotes of Khamenei, including one in which he calls for full annihilation and destruction of the Zionist regime: ``Only way to solve this problem is full annihilation and destruction of the Zionist regime``. This quote is from a speech he gave in 2014. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

679,211,399

:As indicated by User Ism schism earlier, see Wikipedia:Reliable sources and undue weight, and self-revert you edit.

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

679,222,546

==Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 September 2#Katrina Richardson== Since you created one of the redirects (Catherine Smith) mentioned as an example, the above discussion may be of interest.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

679,223,140

:::::::::If you think Mondoweiss has an agenda, explain us why, based on sources, reknown, reputation or clear mistakes or false reports from them coming from sources with a higher standard. That's easy too (or primary sources in which they denounce themselves.) If the only argument is that they are on the left, like Ha'aretz, we cannot anything for you. :::::::::

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

679,231,036

Whatever you say. But I always have backup.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

679,235,057

` * ``Distorted``? That's just a wide-angle shot. `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

679,250,882

:::Reread the thread on Jared Diamond. We don't use him. You have failed to grasp that the objection is not to the fact that the late world ecological change rendered all countries in the northern hemisphere more ertile, etc., but to the silliness of the phrasing ('fostered human development' sounds like a phrase straight out of a pop psychology book.) :::Improved ecological conditions following the last ice age facilitated population growth and a flowering of culture. ref Mark Griffiths, The Lotus Quest: In Search of the Sacred Flower, Random House, 2011 pp.144-146

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

679,264,420

` You have no current ``relationship`` with Rene, nor ANY contact for years; your past history is not relevant NOW, as you pass yourself off as ``knowing`` him and presume to speak for him. I am no mere ``acquaintance`` - my friendship with Rene spans decades, and pre-dates your supposed involvement, so don't presume to lecture me - ``gossip`` you say? Nonsense! Pointing out the true stance of the situation is always preferable to deception; you don't like the fact you were called out on it. Also, your attack, on whom I can only presume is some unsuspecting woman, is so off base as to be amusing. You presume to know who I am; sorry to disappoint, you do not... `

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

679,274,187

:::::::::::I repeat if you think Mondoweiss has an agenda, explain us why, based on sources, reknown, reputation or clear mistakes or false reports from them coming from sources with a higher standard. :::::::::::If you don't answer this question, I think we should not try to discuss with you.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

679,276,110

::::OK, I added topics and refs. I think this should suffice, and you can restore the page.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

679,276,293

:The information can be found in the following Israeli sources :* Benny Morris, 1948. The First Arab-Israeli War, Yale University Press. :* Yoav Gelber, 1948 Palestine War, Sussex Academic Press. :If you are interested to undersand the '48 war I suggest you the 1st one from which you can have all details.

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

679,276,740

` :I share the idea that ``claimed by the State of Palestine`` is the right wording. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

679,291,328

REDIRECT Talk:2015 CONCACAF Cup

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

679,305,581

In response to you VANDALISM with allegation Keep it NEUTRAL read first the official Congressional Record Wikipedia is NOT the source of rumors, bias or propaganda! It MUST be credible! http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CREC-1998-10-20/html/CREC-1998-10-20-pt1-PgE2244-2.htm] Congressional Record Government Publishing Office / Congressional Record Volume 144, Number 150 (Tuesday, October 20, 1998)

2,015

false

user

blocked

dev

false

679,306,761

` :Do you think ``Pluto2012 Encyclopaedia`` is WP:RS ? :I am sure not. :That's nearly as worse for Ariel encyclopaedia. : `

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

679,309,558

==DYK nomination of Rai Simons== Hello! Your submission of Rai Simons at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

679,311,684

` :::The charge of the proof is for the one who brings information. :::What is ``Ariel encyclopaedia`` ? ::: `

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

679,312,142

::::The source is not +972. The source is Michel Waelbroeck.

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

679,318,896

` ::: Completely oppose this. We have little information about the religion of polytheistic pre-Islamic Arabs except the Meccans. And also we have even much more little information about the pre-Islamic Arabic Jews and Christians and especially the Hanifs and such a small amount of information won't be enough to create a separate article for them. I don't see any problem with this article. I don't see any reason to separate it. :::: Also I'm not trying to be offensivr but please don't keep saying ``Cheers`` again and again. Hope you don't mind but it's kind of annoying. Thanks. `

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

679,324,253

` No, what ``offends me`` is the WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT I'm seeing from you, and your overall conduct. You came into a discussion to object to a removal. You didn't even know enough to understand my comment, which anyone else would. I go to your linked article, which was changed from a redirect changed by and consists of nothing but non-RS material added by a known POV editor, and you revert it. Therefore, since your point of view was not being accepted, now somebody was trying to hide something and everyone has a COI. You're also assuming said COI, why? Because Blueboar works in a position where he'd have access to sources? That's not a COI, that's called WP:EXPERT. You assumed no AGF from the get-go, and I'm no longer doing so either. Sometimes people are more knowledgeable in an area than you, and you just need to accept that. `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

679,329,006

` :Hi StevenJ81. Thank you. I correct this. (I think I meant ``background``) `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

679,348,509

: I can't find any source in English that says more about him other than the fact that he's a deputy minister of Iran, some sources do state his views though. I wouldn't mind if you delete the article or nominate it for deletion. Thanks you and best regards,

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

679,360,183

` == A barnstar for you! == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` | The Admin's Barnstar |- |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | Thank you! |}`

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

679,379,670

== Copy of note == As I replied to you on your account: While there are many articles about companies on Wikipedia, they all meet the notability guidelines for inclusion on Wikipedia. Your articles have been repeated deleted because they have not established why your company is notable enough for inclusion or has been purely promotional as seen by the SEO keywords you have been using in your article titles. You have stated in your requests to keep the article, you are the CEO of the company. Therefore, you have a clear conflict of interest regarding any articles you create about the company. You need to read Wikipedia's Business' FAQ before you continue to edit. Finally, you have been editing Wikipedia under three different accounts now. All have been used to promote and/or write about your company. You may only edit Wikipedia using a single account. If you create additional accounts, they will be blocked from editing. I have left your original account, , unblocked and you may continue to edit using that account. However, if you resume creating any more articles about your company, you will be blocked from editing.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

679,398,077

::I swear I added the needs-infobox when updating. I figured that given it would build the correct version with only PROJECT that it was redundant, and not required to include the other two. Seems odd to me to have that stuff. I'll look at the main template and see if the parameters need removed there. Seriously, I swear I added the needs-infobox, maybe I'm going nuttier than I realized.

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

679,409,669

== Blocking == Can any Administrator help block this person? He or she is a vandal and has also reverted many of my edits. This is the IP address>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/105.235.128.209 Thank you.

2,015

false

article

blocked

dev

false

679,414,977

Block me you self-righteous cunt. Do you really have nothing better to do with your time than act as some sort of internet police? You really are utterly pathetic. I'll just make a new account anyway. Sucks to be you I guess.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

679,459,999

::Articles should showcase quality. And all articles that do this should have a shot at being on the front page. This comes up a lot but I don't see the problem...

2,015

false

article

random

train

false

679,468,680

` :::If it occurred long before shooting started and had no impact on the finished film, cast and crew turnover is not important enough to mention in the lead. No response to removing the line about Goddard left as director to pursue another directing opportunity. Your last statement gives no response to what I said about ``The U.S. production`` vs ``American``. Fox not merely financing or distributing is entirely consistent with the film being ``American``. - `

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

679,474,510

== Uma Thurman == Hello, Noreplyhaha! If you'd like to make a case for undoing my edits to the Uma Thurman entry, I'd love to know what your reasons are. I think my edits are all justified for the reasons I stated in the comments, and I will be re-entering them unless there is an important reason not to.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

679,482,417

` :This article was neutral. You, however, have are deleting relevant points such as ``Meanwhile, the Committee to Save Cooper Union and the office of the New York Attorney General (OAG) began building a lawsuit against the board of trustees, launching what it called “an exhaustive investigation into the many missteps on the part of the Board of Trustees, as well as Presidents George Campbell and Jamshed Bharucha and others, over the course of the last 10 years.” The OAG stated that its account included “many of the risky schemes, misrepresentations, and poor governance practices that created the current crisis.. In the fall of 2015, the Attorney General's office and the Committee to Save Cooper Union announced that the proposed lawsuit had been settled, and that the OAG would be filing a consent decree signed by the board, along with a cy pres petition with provisions for returning the school to a sustainable, tuition-free policy, increasing board transparency, adding additional student and alumni trustees, independent financial monitoring, and a search committee to identify the next full-term president. While this did not have an immediate effect on tuition policies, the signed decree and petition signaled a de facto victory for the case of the students and faculty who advocated for a continuation of the school’s original tuition-free policy.`` I have posted an explicit warning to your talkpage . If you continue deleting relevant points from this article and editing to include tired and untrue narratives, you will be banned. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

679,485,174

` : didn't try to explain his ``refugee crisis`` edit on the talk page after multiple undo's. Only later came up with a source that substantiates nothing. The IP 37.76.11.111 was me (I did not care to log in for a mere undo) but not 37.76.42.195. It's not only me in Hungary interested in AND AFFECTED DIRECTLY by this crisis who think in the same way about it. Furthermore i would like to COMPLAIN ABOUT THE CLEAR BIAS of towards The New York Times bordering on BRAND BUILDING: not cites almost EXCLUSIVELY The NYT, but insist on MENTIONING IT BY NAME in the lead section of the article. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

679,485,456

Thank you, I wish you a good work for that. Despite that however more important it's to find the match stats. of it against Monaco won 7-1, it's only one which is missing currently.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

679,487,371

` : A responsible editor should strive to cite sources that are reasonbly assumed to have first hand knowledge and unbiased reportage of a situation and strive to cite not only one source. seems more like having an agenda of pushing The NYT and the idea of ``refugee crisis`` into forefront. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

679,493,013

:Why don't you mention it? (no offence meant) I don't think this questions the neutrality of the article as a whole.

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

679,501,578

` == Migrants and refugees == A refugee is, according to the 1951 Refugee Convention, any person who ``owing to a well-founded fear`` of persecution is outside their country of nationality and ``unable`` or ``unwilling`` to seek the protection of that country. To gain the status, one has to go through the legal process of claiming asylum. The 1951 Refugee Convention: http://www.unhcr.org/pages/49da0e466.html As soon as someone fleeing persecution and mortal danger gets into a country where he/she is no longer persecuted but still caries on ``fleeing`` without invitation by a third country, he/she is no longer a refugee but a migrant. The only real refugees in Europe Schengen Area are Lybian citizens whose country is a direct neighbour to the Schengen Area.`

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

679,504,081

::If these people are refugees fleeing persecution and not economic migrants, why aren't they willing to stop in Italy, France, Austria, Hungary, Serbia, Bulgaria, Greece, Turkey? All are democratic and peacful countries.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

679,506,123

:::: If you would care to serach: MIGRANT CRISIS BBCWSJFinancial TimesThe TelegraphCNNUSA TodayThe Economist

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

679,506,608

. I'm not questioning that there are refugees among all these people, I'm arguing against calling it a European refugee crisis.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

679,513,064

and did not try to explain his stance on the Talk page in either case

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

679,520,266

I deleted the old conversations but they are archived. Why'd you delete my comment on your wall?

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

679,520,905

own advice and stop deleting things

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

679,523,154

`, 5 September 2015 (UTC) ::Since appears to be the ranking wikipedia admin let's welcome him to this conversation. I have deleted one of the old threads relating to an old npov tag that existed prior to this section: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooper_Union_financial_crisis_and_tuition_protests#CU_Administration_views . Since Epstein is now gone, his opinion doesn't matter. Chris Chamberlain, Richard Lincer and Bill Mea are the 3 ranking Administrators who would be able to comment on whether they consider the financial deficit to still be a ``Crisis`` 02:24`

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

679,547,274

:I'll ask the Academy of Korean Studies for the information on the next working day(7th, Sep, 2015) regarding citing its online version of Encyclopedia of Korean Culture, if you find it necessary.

2,015

false

user

random

train

false

679,555,264

` == Proposed amendment to WP:ADMIN regarding paid editing == You recently commented on . A concrete proposal to amend the administrator policy to this effect has been made at Wikipedia talk:Administrators#Proposed change - 'No paid editing`` for admins. Your comments would be appreciated. `

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

679,558,108

I have to vandalize them because they lost heavily to UAE 10-0

2,015

false

user

random

train

false

679,559,451

I would also like to ask, do you regularly spend your time on Heidegger and other philosophy articles, or have you only proceeded because of your harassment of me? I am in the process of improving this article as we speak (and as you waste one of your better's time with your childish games). What precisely are you doing?

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

679,564,654

== A case has been brought against you on ANI == Cheers, good friend!

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

679,567,478

Also, as a far better example of a decent lead with an appropriate length for an article of such high-importance, take a look at Immanuel Kant. Thank you for pointing Freud my way. I will try to fix that travesty as soon as I have time. Freud deserves a longer lead than this site bestows on reality television stars.

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

679,567,591

I am trying to be civil, but what could be more uncivil than a mass delete? I would consider an insult far more civil.

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

679,568,203

Bare Behind Bars? You gave me a level 2 warning, what the fuck is that all about... You one of these power drunk admins?

2,015

false

user

blocked

dev

true

679,569,494

` Imagine finding an article in which every single word is wrong and you will imagine my pain at reading the current Martin Heidegger article. Nor am I the only one who thinks this. Please see the section immediately above this article. Or better yet, spend the next 24 hours reading the first sections of Sein und Zeit and you will see the ridiculousness of the article as it currently stands, which demonstrates no understanding of Heidegger, and leaves everyone who reads it dumber than when they began and knowing less about everything. This is so atrocious that essentially the entire article as it stands needs to be deleted and began again. I have no more time for this. I tried to move the Dreyfus to the main article and now apparently all the material is destroyed. Do you have any comprehension of how bad this article currently is? One would have no idea that Heidegger was ever read anywhere outside of France from the current article. No summaries of Heidegger's important concepts are given. No understanding of any of Heidegger's ideas are conveyed. Since you have decided to destroy my work, you can keep your poor article, which reads as if it was machine-translated from a foreign language. You do not even let someone in the middle of working finish before you destroy their work. No wonder zero academics contribute to this site and your articles are so atrocious. Anyone who reads the article as it currently stands comes away knowing less about Heidegger than they did before because of all of the obvious distortions and gross inaccuracies. You have not even succesfully explained a single one of Heidegger's terms or concepts here, or why anyone should care who he is. This article is an embarassment indeed. Words are important rather than space on the screen because people have different size screens. I have a 27 inch screen and a 5 inch screen, both of which I edit on. The lead is the same amount of words on both screens, but not the same number of ``screens`` for two different users. Word counts give a reasonable approximation of length not dependent on the particularities of users devices, fonts, and other non-content formatting. Generally, essays list word limits not page limits so page limits aren't just fudged with font changes and others. — Preceding unsigned comment added by • `

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

679,569,984

`Who cares about indenting and signing and other wikilawyering rules when you have a high importance article so filled with falsehoods that everyone who reads it comes away knowing less than they did before they read the article? Embarassment is not even a strong enough word for what a farce this article this. The lead is hardly even the worst part. You list ``influence and reception in France`` as if only the French ever Heidegger, to name just the most ridiculous error here. I was in the middle of trying to fix this and you block the page in order to ``win`` rather than work with me to make constructive improvements to an article that is in desperate need of new content, since almost everything currently in there needs to be deleted because it is a distroting misrepresentation and makes no logical sense. Sad to see you all care more about ``winning`` than improving the article or having an encylopedic article on a major philosopher that does not actively contribute to vulgar misconceptions about him, and that actively spreads ignorance, and reads like a machine-translated piece of vandalism. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

679,570,333

` RandyKitty, none of these ``collaborators`` did anything. I welcome their collaboration! Let them add a single line, or even delete a line that they think is unimportant! Mass deleting is not a ``collaboration`` and you are abusing language to make your point. I am the only one who collaborated on here. Take a look at the record, and you shall see I collaborated with at least 4 other editors before 2 ``collaborators`` (who are collaborators in the sense that the French were collaborators with Hitler) simply mass deleted contributions, rather than selectively keeping what they liked or approved of. Please stop abusing language. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

679,570,514

` Interesting to see yet another Wikipedia contributor more interested in showing off the deep knowledge of their WIkipedia J.D. degree rather than improving a page with more falsehoods and distortions than I can count. This is almost certainly the worst page on Wikipedia, although that abortion of the Sigmund Freud page I was just shown as an example of a ``good`` page comes rather close. Am I the only one here with eyes? `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

679,570,939

::::::: It looks like a country article, which is basically dishonest.

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

679,571,263

Rather than someone explain everything they have learneed in their 3 years of Wikipedia Law School, how about anyone defend the outright abortion and spreading of ignorance of the current page? Disgusting. I had thought people wanted to come here to spread knowledge, instead they wish to rise to arbitrary positions of power and abuse that power to show how tough they are. You have all conducted yourselves in a truly outrageous and shameful manner. Learn the rules of Wikipedia? How about you show that you actually care about the article not being less accurate than a piece of toilet paper with which I have just used to wipe my ass? If this article was written by a speaker fluent in English, I will eat my hat.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

679,572,768

` Randy, I am not apologizing to you for an obvious joke, so you will have to somehow manage to go on without one. What is truly outrageous is how little you care about the ``embarrassing`` state of the article (not my words, but those of several editors above), but you care a great deal about making sure there are indents, and tildes, and every one of your trite, nonsensical, kangarroo-court rules has been followed. I am sure your mother is very proud of your Wikipedia J.D. law degree, but you are not getting any more of my time to contribute to your project and correct your obvious falsehoods and text that does not clearly appear to have been written by an English speaker familiar with Heidegger and able to name even a few of his main concepts. Please point me to the place in the article where even one of H's primary philosophical concepts are reasonably explained, so that a reader may have any idea of what he is after. The current page leaves everyone less intelligent and knowledgeable than they were before reading it. I promise you, that you are not getting even one minute more of my time in any event. This article is so bad that it needs to be gone through paragraph by paragraphy and replaced my new content. Nearly every paragraph in it leaves the reader knowing less true things about Heidegger than the reader knew before. If you would like to actually know something about Heidegger, read the article I wrote. I managed to explain in the lead the main ideas which one needs to know about Heidegger. The current article does not even succesfully explain Heidegger's thought or his importance within the entire article, and inculcates a number of gross and vulgar misconceptions. It would be almost impossible to imagine a philosophy article that was filled with more sophmoric drivel, and reads like a machine-translated text of an undergraduate who has never read the author, and wishes to spread as much misinformation as possible. If you prefer reading an article that seems to claim that Heidegger has only been read in France and is unable to successfully name or explain EVEN A SINGLE ONE OF HEIDEGGER'S CONCEPTS, please by all means, waste your time on doing so. I am finished with this. Adieu. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

679,573,025

` That might be the single dumbest thing I have ever read. Is this editor intellectually disabled? Does he have any actual idea what the word ``argument`` means? `

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

679,573,829

` Here, from the talk page, three other editors confirming my judgment of just how ``embarassing`` the current article is, and which contributes to the common conception among academics that Wikipedia is primarily written by intellectually disabled kindergartners and high-school dropouts on a power-trip: 'm sorry but the introduction is an embarrassingly crass articulation of what Heidegger's project is about. It is embarrassing and needs to be fixed! I agree, especially with sources. From what I understand of Heidegger, the three paragraphs in the introduction are roughly accurate, but they require edits to become smooth and easily understandable. But most importantly, there are no references!! I find the biography and following subjects are for the most part thoroughly cited, but the intro is not? I will keep my eye out for references, but anyone who is knowledgable and wellread on the subject should consider adding references to the introduction. Jdanbeck (talk) I'd say the second paragraph is inaccurate, and in fact absolute nonsense. It neither reflects Heidegger's position, nor is coherent in itself. There used to be a decent intro. Revert to it? KD Tries Again (talk) KD Tries Again And then, have a look at the fact that 4 editors supported me, before a single WIKILAWYER arrived at the scene, to mass delete. How exactly can I ``lose`` an argument about Heidegger by calling you Hitler? Whether or not you or I or anyone is an idiot or a Nazi or whatever has no reflection on whether or not the current article ACTIVELY SPREADS MISINFORMATION, as I have repeatedly stated and showed. Goodbye. I hope someday you all have the experience of reading Heidegger, as it is an electrifying experience which I hope no one will deny themselves due to this abortion of a 3rd grader's Wikipage. Truly sad to see how little you actually care about your pages being informative, true, or approrpriate to their topic's importance. Despicable, in fact. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

679,574,407

` Q: ``Name a Heideggerian concept the Current Wikipedia Article on Martin Heidegger successfully explains...`` A: ``There is none.```

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

679,593,296

` : Good catch - I just checked the credits and you're right that he's credited on character design. However, he doesn't seem to be the one who designed Samus according to the page you linked. Also, in the credits, it's listed like this (with this spacing): CHARACTER DESIGNED BY KIYOTAKE NEW MATSUOKA SHIKAMOTO :...which suggests he didn't have a primary/lead role - enemy design perhaps. He's still contradicted by the director/co-creator/fellow character designer though. But this is an important point, so thank you for making the correction. `

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

679,602,012

:Yea, if you want to go round tidying up your pal's mess good luck to you. Happy editing.

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

679,642,555

: I restored the logo per Template:Infobox video game#General fields (plus the screenshot is already used below the infobox). Happy editing!

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

679,645,648

You love the devil and worship him.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

679,666,696

:Typical ip playing, but stopped now ... roll on )

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

679,674,046

Interesting theory, detective. But who can say who anyone *is* really? What criterion of personal identity are we employing here? In any event , don't you think your time might be more profitably spent fixing the broken Heidegger page, in which I have already informed you and demonstrated, all but two of the sentences in the lead are guilty of errors of fact or interpretation? And which grossly distorrts the importance of the Heidegger-nazi episode? Why not pick your head out of your ass and fix the fucking articles instead of playing Cowboys and Indians or hardy boys or whatever masturabtory fantasy you are engaged in here? good night old friends!

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

true

679,679,607

`::I believe you work for the correction department of wikipedia user policy investigators. I hope to participate undoubtedly on that issue regarding my alternative account. Carry on. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

679,695,711

== Requesting Protection == This article needs to be protected, as it's inevitably going to be a frequent target for vandals from 4chan's /pol/ board due to the fact that cartoonist and /pol/ meme Ben Garrison lives here.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

679,703,474

:There was no edit warring, ! We were discussing along the reverts to reach consensus!

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

679,704,302

::: Alright, but what's so bad when those good-faith reverts could help us reach a consensus? Anyway, I take note of that for future disputes.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

679,706,832

It's not hard to make and educated guess as to what that decision might be, as Roof has already confessed to the killings and stated that his goal was to start a race war , but it's not our place to second-guess the courts.

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

679,715,845

` == Redirect from hoax page ``Hamlet of Denmark`` == Hello ! I just wanted to point out that the redirect that you created from Hamlet of Denmark should point to Prince Hamlet (which is the article dedicated to the character) and not to Hamlet. Best regards! * I thought about it, but the play also has King Hamlet, the ghost. (I have no preference either way; if you believe Prince Hamlet would have been a better target, I might reduce the protection for a while, so that you can change it.) - :* Well, I confess that I have absolutely no idea about how to find whether people who search for ``Hamlet of Denmark`` are more interested in the prince or in the king. I would say the prince, but it would be only a conjecture. Given the ambiguous nature of the expression, your choice seems the most reasonable. Sorry if I didn't give a better thought on it before contacting you. Cheers! == Why my page has been deleted? == I want to know what was wrong about the last page i've created: Making Sense. I want to republish it, what do I have to change? Thanks. == Jewish Supremacism (My Awakening to the Jewish Question) == Hi @Mike Rosoft: please explain where the text is promotion of the book and the ideas contained in the book? In the first time is better that define the portion of text that had problem. : Considering the draft presents a hateful and insane conspiracy theory by a white supremacist as if it were factual? Hi @Ian.thomson: Please talk about Wikipedia rules and do not tell insult word. I say that this is not a valid reason for speed deletion. The admin must stated it in talk page until solved. @Mike Rosoft:Please reply to my question. Do is G11 rule in speed deletion? :The draft presented lies by a known conspiracy theorist as ``meticulously research.`` To call that promotional is better than that deserves. :WP:G11 says that ``Unambiguous advertising or promotion`` is to be speedily deleted. The lies David Duke wrote were promoted as ``meticulously research.`` @Ian.thomson: You have a personal problem with this book and the idea of the author. Please observe the rules and don't tell loose talk. This is your idea about this book that is a lies but many people in the world are against to your idea. I decided to edit this subject and submit in this page. @Mike Rosoft: In the content and purpose of book sections, I selected and wrote several sentence from this book. So, I think some people had against idea with it. I want introduce this book just and i had not any goal. please explain about text and say where have problem? * already explained to you what was wrong with the article; so did I on your talk page. The article largely repeats the claims made by the book as a fact. And if an article about a books starts by calling it ``a meticulously research`` [sic], it starts wrong. See the policy of neutrality and ``What Wikipedia is not``. - : I can change this sentence and remove this adverb. Can you restore this page until fix this section? * No, I am not going to restore the article. In any case, I didn't delete it because of a minor grammar error; I deleted it because it promoted the book and its ideas. Even removing the sentence in question wouldn't change the fact. As far I am concerned, there is nothing to discuss here; if you still believe that the article shouldn't have been deleted, please go to deletion review. - * This is a important book in the world about Jewish people but not all Jewish people. This book said about the people that have Supremacism act. Therefore, you must think about introduction of book and help to fix it not delete it. please restore it until edit it. * Hey, I write again about this subject and publish it but you can not delete my draft page. You have self interest with this book. I solve this problem and publish this subject again. :: Actually read the article David Duke. Notice that he's known as ``white nationalist, conspiracy theorist,`` and ``advocate of antisemitic conspiracy theories.`` That means that he believes that white people are superior to everyone else so his claims about anyone else being supremacist are going to be lies. He's also a conspiracy theorist, so his claims about history and sociology are going to be lies, too. He's also an antisemite, so anything he writes about Jews are going to be lies, too. Just because he quoted the Talmud does not mean he quoted it in context. If you refuse to understand this, I will go to WP:ANI and see if we can arrange a topic ban for you. Mike and I are not the ones with a personal problem here. * I read the Duke website and many part of his book but I tried to stated and introduced the book not Duke's idea. Therefore, I edited the text and try again until introduce the book not Duke's idea. :: You're still calling it ``influential,`` downplaying the fact that Duke is a notorious conspiracy theorist and white supremacist, and claiming ``Jewish Supremacism must be authentic.`` I'm going to the administrator's noticeboard to request a topic ban because you obviously have a bias supporting the book's hateful lies. EDIT: I've made the thread. ::Mike, I've mentioned you in the ANI thread ``Topic ban on Jews and Judaism needed for AliAkar``. == Store Twenty One == Hello there. I was going to create Store Twenty One, but discovered that it had previously existed and had been removed deleted by yourself (I think). The notice suggested that I contact the administrator who deleted the page. Store Twenty One has about 200 shops in the UK and c.£100m annual turnover and I think is fairly notable chain on the British high street. I wanted to read up on it and was surprised no page existed. Is it possible to see the version of the page that previously existed? I might be able to add more useful content. Thanks. * I have restored the article, but it's almost devoid of content. - ==Copyright of government works== Hi @Mike Rosoft: Thanks for your attention to this matter. If we and also administrator of the website don't know the copyright holder of a photo, what should we do for upload this photo in commons? == Hi == how do I revert edit? I notice some vandalisms. Thanks. Also, how do I redirect a page? Thanks, it worked! ==N game== What do you think about an image I added on an N game article, since it wasn't illustrated? ([[User talk:The N

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

679,716,247

entitled to remove the comment which I have done so leave it be.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

679,716,562

There is a user by the name of Mike Rosoft who is a dirty prick whom I do not like. If you see him, tell him to stay the hell off my page!

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

679,719,965

why on earth would I want to edit your page?

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

679,721,101

I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE I DONT CARE

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

679,721,926

THE WIKIPEDIA TWATBAGS!

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

679,729,195

' :bismarck is portrayed as a culprit and the catholic church as a victim Wait, are you suggesting here that Bismarck, who boasted how he wants to exterminate whole nation he hates, is the victim here? Please explain your sentence.

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

679,731,268

Since ethnicity is hot-topic for greek editors, it shall be separate not to disrupt the whole text.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

679,738,550

` Hi, I also have an another project for a very advanced keyboard that allow to write any languages with same configuration and would like to work with Logitech on this project. Because since we use lot script in my life and in Macedonia (Cyrril, Latin, Greek, Arab), the standard keyboard that we use now based The Remington typewriter of C. L. Sholes. is to limitative and to simple and now allow to write phonetic, subscript / superscript, minuscule capital, and some special character like the non‑breaking hypen ``‧⁠``(U+2027 + U+2060) or non‑breaking minus ``‑`` (U+2011), also I would like to add mathematical minus ``−`` (U+2212) to numeric pad instead of only ``-`` (U+002C). Also it is possible to change the unicode script easily, and to see the change with LCD touch / key. The vision that I have for keyboard is very good. Please help to make it U.S.A... Help me, for this other project. `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

679,738,735

== Propose to merge the main national article with the results article == Basing also in latest additions by and about my opinion, I propose that it would be better to merge this article with Albania national football team results into the section History, because every national football team here has it own history at the main article.

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

679,738,967

Basing also in latest additions by and about my opinion, I propose that it would be better to merge this article with the main artcile of Albania national football team into the section History, because every national football team here has it own history at the main article.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

679,739,013

Proposing to merge this article with the main artcile of Albania NFT

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

679,739,812

` :::I'm being blocked for comments that I made months ago? And I was no more ``uncivil`` than several Wikipedia admins - like , for example - regularly are. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

679,751,750

You have pointed out problematic editing about this

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

679,762,028

` == Promotion of economic pseudoscience with obvious contradiction on ``money creation`` page. == It is absurd that two things that are in fact opposites describe one FACT - how money is created. Just because a topic is ``well sourced`` does not mean ANYTHING. The ``mainstream`` theory is the accurate one. I am extremely disappointed in constant reporting on quack ``theory`` and promotion of pseudoscience by yourself. `

2,015

false

user

blocked

dev

false

679,764,943

== Reserve Requirements == What does reserve requirements are a myth mean? They are not. There really are reserve requirements. You are confused. Go read an economics textbook.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

679,767,400

` Cheers. But there is only one point of view on money creation. There is no debate - can't be. So if I find sources that ``prove`` money is dropped by storks it can added as an ``alternative view``?? You are abusing NPOV.`

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

679,768,168

Saying that Largoplazo only nominated the article for deletion because of deletionist tendencies is hardly uncivil and is entirely valid considering that he just nominated the article for deletion again, even AFTER I added more sources to it. He's clearly aiming to take advantage of the fact that I can't currently edit the Articles for deletion page to defend the article, which is patently childish and uncivil behavior. For example, if I were capable of editing the Articles for deletion page that he just created, I would note that the film has been covered in all sorts of notable sources, like: http://explore.bfi.org.uk/4ce2b78523a6f - British Film Institute http://www.villagevoice.com/film/tuli-kupferberg-is-god-and-a-shoulda-been-cult-hit-finally-gets-its-ny-premiere-6429111 - The Village Voice https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/store/movies/voulez-vous-coucher-avec-god/8d6kgwzl5h7h - Microsoft https://itunes.apple.com/gb/movie/voulez-vous-coucher-avec-god/id645402033 - iTunes https://www.iffr.com/en/films/voulez-vous-coucher-avec-god/ - International Film Festival Rotterdam https://books.google.com/books?id=1GCX5KQ0JXoC&pg;=PT190&dq;=%22Voulez-vous+coucher+avec+God%22&hl;=en&sa;=X&ved;=0CDYQ6AEwBWoVChMI_qekx_jixwIViJMeCh0VmglK#v=onepage&q;=%22Voulez-vous%20coucher%20avec%20God%22&f;=false - Buenos Aires International Festival of Independent Cinema ...to name just a few. I would also point out that several notable people were involved with the film, like the VERY notable Tuli Kupferberg, who stars in it. But I can't edit the page because I'm blocked right now, and he nominated the article for deletion again only after you blocked me - because he wanted to make sure I couldn't edit the Articles for deletion page. That kind of behavior is far more damaging to the encyclopedia than anything that I said to him.

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

679,772,308

` Rob, how does money creation work then? Either the ``alternate theory`` is correct or it is bollocks. Which one is correct? Delete the wrong one. If you don't I think I will edit as I please ;) `

2,015

false

user

blocked

dev

false

679,773,605

== Economics is religion == THANK YOU. For proving my point. Economics is religion not science! Money creation is metaphysical! Twat.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

679,775,869

:*Reviewing admin, please note violated the spirit of Wikipedia:Edit_warring#The_three-revert_rule by deleting the edits of 3 different users at Cooper Union financial crisis and tuition protests. He did so not 1, not 2, not 3, but 4 times over the course of a few days. I honestly did not realize outing was against policy, so I apologize for violating policy by outing on wiki and will never do so again. But please ensure Beyond My Ken stops his disruptive behavior at Cooper Union financial crisis and tuition protests. He also deleted relevant discussion both on his talk page (technically acceptable) and a relevant query from the Cooper Union financial crisis and tuition protests talk page. Requesting that the top 3 Current Admins' views be added to the article inside of a talk page is not a discussion that should have been deleted by , even if I technically failed to archive his old threads properly.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

679,777,389

: It reads like someone who doesn't speak English very well misquoted Christopher Bruce's Dictionary of Arthurian Names. I fixed the language and added a ref.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false