dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
679,778,836	` ::Thank you for the info . I had no idea that outing was against policy, and I apologize for violating policy. It is my hope that will cease his megalomaniacal control over all other opinions at Cooper Union financial crisis and tuition protests. I will certainly not out him again on wiki, and it is my hope that he will move on to other articles. I see that this user is involved in a proposed amendment to WP:ADMIN regarding . Beyond My Ken ought set example for ensuring no admins are paid for their services, but he is far too close to CUfcatp to be an objective editor as he has lorded over the article for nearly 2 years. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
679,790,883	== I have my payback. == I will get you.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
679,813,074	`Notice that her own widely-read book is not mentioned in References. And look at the reference that is there. Who's behind all this elaborate smear? ``Anti=semitism``? Accused by whom? why? I wouldn't edit this entry on a dare... [[Wetman} I agree - I also think this run-on should be deleted, but fear editing it. ``The state and nature of their marriage has been the subject of much speculation, with some claiming it is a purely political arrangement and widespread stories about their regular arguments, but the fact remains that they have remained together (and whilst spending extended periods apart still vacation together, apparently) long after the political necessity for the marriage to stay together passed.`` I think it's repetitive of the sentence before, and somewhat inappropriate. ==US Senator==/== Senate Election (2000) == Question: has Hillary done anything noteworthy as a senator yet? 01:09 Oct 9, 2002 (UTC) :I did try to include a header on this, but it was removed by Salazar. This does need research & inclusion. It says in the article that she campaigned heavily in Upstate New York. She campaigned in heavily Democratic areas of New York, like Albany, but the traditionally Republican areas in Upstate New York really didn't have a candidate: Lazio is a RINO; he likes government-run social programs, he supports abortion, he's antigun, etc. I remember reading in the Press & Sun-Bulletin (a Binghamton-area newspaper), that her campaign aides had determined that downstate was such an easy sell for her, that she only needed around 30% of the vote in Upstate. (I think she got 32% or so in my county Wolfman, obviously I don't object to the editing in principle, and you and I have made some opposite kinds of edits to other political articles, with an appropriate degree of attention to NPOV, but I think with respect to your changes to my Senate section Edit, you kept the facts I inserted that were favorable to Sen. Clinton (ie, ``Two-thirds of the voters dismissed the carpetbagging issue,``) but removed much of the factual information that portrayed her in a negative light (specifically, the objective fact that she returned a $50,000 campaign donation from the Muslim group accused of terrorist connections, and the kissing of Arafat's wife). These events actually figured into the campaign and they are actual facts, not POV. And I was careful I thought to avoid implying that these events were evidence of anything (which is a POV), I just stated the fact that they were part of the Republican attacks on her, which is objective. I'd appreciate some reply but I'll give it some time before attempting to revise my section. == Page moved == See ==Neutrality== This page doesn't mention Whitewater or her role in the health care plan, two of the things she's most famous for. Also, some of the prose is fairly fawning; e.g., ``the two were soon inseperablepartners in moot court, political campaigns, and matters of the heart``. Needs a neutral party to go over this and add facts, NPOV. I don't know enough to do it. Again, if you feel it is NPOV, add the White Water and healtcare section. It is not that hard, it is on the Bill Clinton page. ChrisDJackson Well, as I said, I don't really know enough about this topic, I was just drawing attention to this for others who might be able to help the article. I dispute the neutrality of this page. Do I know enough to fix it? Not really. But even so, you have no right to remove the header. Thank you. Please do not remove the Neutrality Dispute header. I'm in the process of finding people to correct this, but you have no right to remove it. ==Signature== I removed Hillary's signature from the page. If it's going to be re-added, at least put it off to the side with a caption. As it was it looked like an attempt at making it look like she signed the page. But since I'm not sure her signature is relevant in the first place, I removed it rather than fixing it. ==Naming the husband==N	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
679,831,498	:::***I don't give a fuck. I just want to point out that responding to you casting aspersions like the above, and your previous comment, and most of your recent comments in fact, is not baiting.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
679,832,272	You were and are hopelessly mistaken about that. Not much point going into it - it's not rocket science. It is an obvious and necessary improvement). You can disagree, but calling it baiting is irrational.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
679,840,463	` == Infobox == Was she really ``active`` up until 2015? `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
679,848,638	== Reddit == Someone on reddit said you and Ryulong were a couple. Is it true?	2,015	false	user	blocked	test	false
679,852,559	` :There is no such word in Latin. Are you thinking of Latin artus ``joint, sinew, limbs``? Regardless, it is highly unlikely that this is the source of the Welsh name Arthur. ~~~~ `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
679,852,702	` == Etymology== There might be another possible etymology source. Arthur, from Latin Artu, ``Strongarm``, the latin equivalent of Breifbras, Caradoc's epithet. see section 5, http://levigilant.com/Bulfinch_Mythology/bulfinch.englishatheist.org/arthur/Caradoc-Vreichvras.htm	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
679,858,929	:::::::::::Just FYI, on the French wiki, we finally chose to talk about proto-State. Palestine has numerous features of a State (starting by recognition) but lack some others (eg a define territory and a control of this). It is a State de jure -partly- but not really de facto -with some exception-. So it is a State in building: a proto-State. :::::::::::Some sources (in French) use that wording. I don't know in English. :::::::::::	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
679,868,285	==Some More International Newspapers headlines== * click * Click * Click * Click * Click * Click So the story isnt that as being portrayed by my dear friends in this article.	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
679,874,485	, 7 September 2015 (UTC) ::::I don’t know if you’re currently able to edit your own Talk, but if you are: I’ve edited that notice of mine. Is it less confusing now? Thanks. — 09:42	2,015	false	user	random	test	false
679,885,228	Machine (hardware platform)\|Steam	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
679,950,822	` :If anyone at any point wishes to make a go at creating a critical reception section, then sources are hidden under the Principal roles and cast members section.. I added the sources thinking I would have a go at creating this section, however it is not something I am very good at. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
679,951,012	` ::::No problem. Don't forget to drop a note regardless, when you have the BRFA and when you have gotten the bot approved.—:Online `	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
679,951,082	` == Critical Reception == If anyone at any point wishes to make a go at expanding the critical reception section, then a wide range of sources are hidden under the section header. I added the sources thinking I would have a go at creating this section, however it is not something I am very good at. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
679,954,006	` == Critical Reception == If anyone at any point wishes to make a go at expanding the critical reception section, then a wide range of sources are hidden under the section header. I added the sources thinking I would have a go at creating this section, however it is not something I am very good at. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
679,974,513	` == West Europe vs. Western Europe == , perhaps you're used to the using the adjective westeuropäisch in German. I wish we spoke German, because it is much easier to understand the difference between what is correct or incorrect. To speak of English though, the overwhelming number of examples I've seen tend to have instances of ``Western European`` sooner than ``West European.`` If you look at work done on Wikipedia, you will see the majority of editors prefer the term ``Western European`` over ``West European.`` `	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
679,978,661	``` (for example, Western European Union).`	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
679,985,727	Now that I have created an account will I have the privilege to edit locked pages, or is this something that is granted over time?	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
679,992,085	` ::::::::forgot you were ``there``, bad time for attempt at a joke `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
679,993,568	` : Lad, you've been edit warring for more than a decade - as , then now this account. Every time inevitably you exhaust the community's patience, disappear for a bit then come back with a ``clean`` account. When's it going to click that the behavior needs to change not just the account name? For your sake and everyone's take a step back and honestly think about how you interact with people and how it might improve. Cheers. `	2,015	false	user	blocked	test	false
679,994,409	` == Denali == Don’t know whether you’re aware but this editor isn’t interested in compromise. He’s been edit warring for more than a decade - as , then now this account. Every time inevitably he exhausts the community's patience, disappears for a bit then comes back with a ``clean`` account. Not sure when it's going to click that the behavior needs to change not the account name. Anyway, I don't think trying to reason with him's going to work but good luck. `	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
679,995,443	How's that? I'm restoring an editor's comment which another editor removed. I'm familiar with the WP:NPA policy and it didn't run afoul. What's the issue?	2,015	false	user	blocked	test	false
679,996,491	` : Isn't that exactly the point? One's ``perception`` is not necessarily the reality of the situation. I can be looking at a doughnut and, in my perception, it is a canary. That's just my perception. In reality, it is a doughnut, regardless of my perspective and regardless of what I think it is. No? `	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
679,996,585	My thinking that it is a doughnut does not, in fact, make the canary become a doughnut. Right?	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
680,055,907	== lede == The video was originally posted to ebaumsworld prior to youtube existing, maybe a note of it's origins is warrented?	2,015	false	article	blocked	test	false
680,056,179	` == This article should be named ``Mega Drive`` == The name ``Genesis`` was only used in North America and isn't the common name for the system. `	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
680,065,690	` ::I just checked myself and found another possible source of confusion, please note that ``Thad Caldwell`` is my writing pseudonym (combining the names of my favorite authors) that I was previously using as my signature before having it changed to ``TJC-tennis-geek``. You can verify that using my user page from when I had issues with my signature. Thanks. `	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
680,095,237	:::Denial is a river in Africa. Denali is a mountain in Alaska.	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
680,109,311	:Hello, around 50 % resettled in the territory of former Mandatory Palestine and around 50 % outside (Lebanon, Syria, Egypt and Jordan).	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
680,116,652	How can this be justified?	2,015	false	user	blocked	test	false
680,116,717	someone who is behaving	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
680,117,953	` This is not a personal attack as it clearly discusses behaviour as opposed to the ``individual`` so not a personal attack ... Read the unblock and review the actions that led to a one month block, I think you will be surprised`	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
680,119,056	You clearly need to read the blocking rules... 1 month ban for telling someone he worships the devil? seriously is wikipedia now run by the church? Do us a favour and dont be an idiot.	2,015	false	user	blocked	dev	false
680,119,420	Fucking cabal of donkey raping shit eaters I hope you all get cancer.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	true
680,150,106	== The original Columbia Municipal == WeirdI always assumed that Columbia Municipal Stadium as originally built in 1934 is essentially the lower half of the current Williams-Brice Stadium's grandstands. How's that not the casejust because one grandstand was completely rebuilt?	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
680,159,086	:: What are the BLP reasons for the generic question that had nothing to do with Clinton?	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
680,159,694	== Help request == I'd like to request help from an Admin. Thanks.	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
680,160,156	That is not my question. Re-read the question. And stop imputing your own interpretation.	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
680,174,973	::::The fact that Regavim is not a settlement but is a NGO is not a matter here. ::::The reasons to give both the pov of the International Law and Israel is to comply with NPoV and the wording that are used were based on discussions to avoid edit wars on the topic. ::::It is relevant here given Regavim (NGO) defends the point of view of the settlers and emphasize the legal aspects. ::::That's totally obivous. I add that you asked for a source that was talking about Regavim in this context and you was provided by me here above. I will not write this a 3rd time. ::::	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
680,178,386	` == NPoV == @ In this article that you created, you wrote ``(...) pray at the compound``. That's not exactly what the source says. Would you mind reporting the statu quo that has been negociated between Jewih religious authorities and Waqf, as well as between Jordan and Israeli authorities regarding the management of the ``al-Haram al-Sharif / Temple Mount``. That's an important background in order to understand the situation. Of course, would some group contests this, that should reported too. I could not find this in the source ``funded by the northern branch of Israel’s Islamic Movement``. The reference to Isrel is amazing and in any case requires a very good sources with information cross-checking. I wonder if the use of ``Jewish extremists`` and ``activists`` is appropriate here. Given the sources are highly poved (not to say not wp:rs) this should be contextualized at minimum. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
680,179,601	` :: Being opposed to LGBT philosophy or movement doesn't make somebody an ``homophobe``. Exactly as defending Israel policies doesn't make somebody a racist or being opposed to Judaism doesn't make somebody an ``antisemite``. ::NB: Settleman, from recently you have started adding material from both sides but you don't comply with NPoV yet anyway. You have some ideas of what is the pov of opponents to some Israeli policies but when you write an article on such a topic, it is not enough to google for some articles about what they say. You have to understand their arguments as well as you understand those that you share/listen day-to-day and put all of them in article in order that everybody understand them. You also have to introduce their arguments ``fairly`` so that they can be understood. ::The big issue [for you] will be that on the statistical point of view, you should face 50% of time arguments from the other side partly stronger than the ones you believe in. How will you manage this if your are pro-Israel and revendicate this or the right to be so on wp ? ::As a good start you could start by trying to understand the Muslim and the Palestinian point of view regarding al-Haram al-Sharif / Temple Mount and introducing this on the article your recently created. :: `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
680,183,379	== Manika == Hello Ritchie333, why should I be lucky? I deleted the vandalism from the . This was not a silly edit war.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
680,193,668	` :The citation for the first sentence shows pictures of something that resembles some sorts of animals of which some might be of dogs, if you use your imagination. I dispute that they, and the picture under this section, represent saluki-like hounds. Similarly for the pottery mentioned in the second sentence, plus the Egyptian tombs reference is mentioned further in the section. The third sentence mentions links with the Avesta, Bible and Koran but offers nothing regarding chapter, verse or sutra. The Koran extract makes no mention of saluki-like hounds, it refers to the ``hunting animals``. Therefore, I am removing these 3 sentences as they do not meet WP:CITE. I have issues with other parts of this section, perhaps editors might like to review their contribution for quality. • • `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
680,200,419	` == Often == there is no evidence for the article to state that Orange Order parades have ``often`` led to violence. The two sources don't mention it, indeed they only refer to two separate incidences in Belfast over the past year or two. The reasoning of past tense is also tenuous seeing as ``have sometimes`` is also past tense. Out of the vast number of Orange Order parades a year (well over a thousand, including main demonstration and feeder), very few have any disturbances, and when they do happen it is almost always in Belfast (and usually a feeder parade of a couple of lodges), either near the Short Strand or Ardoyne. Stating ``sometimes`` better reflects the reality as it is not as common as the press and republicans would have people believe. How many Orange Order parades and 12ths through mainly nationalist towns have led to violence? Even during the Troubles it is in the minority. So unless you can reliably source that it ``often`` has led to violence, then the article should not state it as it is implying that it happens a lot when in reality in terms of the number of parades, it doesn't really. `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
680,209,297	` :::::::I didn't claim to be a new user. Do you want to be applauded for your bad decision-making, or are you just unwilling to apologize for it, or even admit to it? Can I count on this much hand-wringing and dumb scrutiny for every single innocuous, obviously valid and easily verifiable edit I make, or have you now added me to a whitelist of ``acceptable users`` who are allowed to edit Wikipedia on your watch? :::::::You want to see arrogance? Look in the mirror, dispense with the veiled threats, and stop trying to justify conduct for which you ought to be apologizing. `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
680,217,115	== Figures == In a previous version of this article, it says that Saudi Arabia has offered $476 million to Syrian Refugees, in a later version, $280 million is mentioned. Which is correct?	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
680,219,228	::: Thanks. And fuck you.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
680,222,474	== Deletion discussion about J Money Ca$H Money == Hello, Immaboss1111111, I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether J Money Ca$H Money should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J Money Ca$H Money . If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top. Thanks,	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
680,225,624	:Erm, thanks. Please explain why	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
680,230,005	` :Ah. I only noticed where it says at the top ``Note: happens at about 17:30 Britain time.`` Now I see the ``Marking as Ready``. Doh. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
680,231,929	think there are better alternatives than not having any criteria for including anyone,	2,015	false	article	random	train	false
680,237,092	` ::There are so many things wrong here that I really don't even know where to begin. 1. The comments were obviously directed at ME, since they were left on the top of MY talk page and referred to ME as a ``cunt``. It's not the first time that someone has left that kind of vandalism on my talk page. Look at its history. It's people from 4chan targeting me. 2. None of those IP addresses belong to me. If they did, they would have been autoblocked since I was blocked at the time. Also, believe or not, I really do have better things to do than tell myself that I hope I get raped and killed. 3. The fact that you are so paranoid that you actually think that the vandalism on MY talk page is directed at YOU - even though it was AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE - really says it all. 4. You assuming that those vandal IP addresses belong to me is assuming bad faith in the extreme. Don't believe me? Feel free to use Checkuser. I almost cannot believe how absurd and paranoid you are being right now. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
680,237,536	Here is another example.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
680,246,662	` ::This is Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Best known for IP; it's being going on for years. (waves to ) Sadly Wikipedia really lacks a good way of dealing with editors who make good (or at the very least good faith) edits but cannot work with others or accept alternative points of view. We've tried all sorts of things but nothing has stuck. PS: I am a big fan of your edit notice. `	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
680,250,229	` == ArbCom questions / discussion == Hello Guerillero, You wrote this: :I am reading evidence as it comes it and trying to make it more of a discussion of what is going on than a one way evidence dump that the arbs read and act on. While questions are directed to a particular editor anyone can answer them. Note, please do not use this as a place to argue, debate or rehash conflicts. If you disagree with someone's response, post your answer. Guerillero \| Parlez Moi Could you please tell where we can answer to you ? Is this just ``below`` your question or is it somewhere else ? `	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
680,272,060	:::Indeed it does.	2,015	false	user	random	train	false
680,313,771	:::::::::: I see nothing in this, so what's your point?	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
680,315,006	== Celtic languages == Hi, could you please consider interceding on the Celtic languages article? A few editors, including the notorious troublemaker , are edit warring with me in order to remove a perfectly accurate map of the modern Celtic countries with shaded regions for where Celtic languages are still actively spoken - all because one of these editors - who clearly doesn't have much knowledge of Celtic languages - said he didn't understand the map. This editor, has even reported me to WP for reverting the removal of the map.	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
680,319,534	== Tags on article == Yeah, this article is very poor. Un cited material, I'd say this is more of a coat racking venture than anything else. I'd like to see this nominated for deletion. Awful, even by Wikipedia standards. This article is tagged for a reason, please fix it.	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
680,324,955	I'm thinking of moving this page to List of fictional demons and devils and then adding additional items like that guy from Devil's Advocate (movie), Louis Cipher from Angel Heart, the devil from South Park, etc... Objections?	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
680,351,942	Fuck off back to India you cunt.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	true
680,390,813	== List of Days of Our Lives characters == Your recent move of this page was reverted by another editor. Do you want to open a move discussion? The template is available. Thank you,	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
680,399,720	` ::::Thanks. I was on the way to doing that myself, but it would take me awhile. The links for ``Weekend Update`` really shouldn't be repeated per WP:REPEATLINK. Also, the use of small font should be avoided there per MOS:FONTSIZE, but I won't push the issue. `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
680,414,211	` Pinging the blocking admin for review. `	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
680,420,425	== Welsh-speaking people == Given the centuries of persecution suffered by Welsh-speakers (just read the history - it makes for shocking reading), the fact that the Welsh language still exists as a living language is nothing short of a miracle. Naturally therefore, it is of much interest to those interested in the Welsh language, those interested in Welsh current affairs, those interested in minority languages as well as to many members of the public in general, for it to be acknowledged that certain notable public figures e.g. politicians, sportspeople or musicians have the ability to speak Welsh. Indeed, failing to do so seems to suggest that the Welsh language is of no significance, to anybody. Whilst some may argue that the language that one speaks is not actually significant, this viewpoint is likely to be prevalent in individuals with a limited understanding of minority languages/cultures. Put another way, whilst the fact that a notable person can speak English may not be necessarily of interest - mainly due to the fact that English is the third most widely-spoken language in the world - by contrast, when a notable person who happens also to speak Welsh is not acknowledged as a Welsh speaker this is missing a very important point, simply because Welsh is much less prevalent than English. Yes, defining a cohort of Welsh-speaking people is of interest to many people, even if that does not happen to include the person(s) who instigated the deletion of this category in the first place. Therefore, just as the section 'Notable people with the name Prabhu', or 'Category:Black British people', for example, may not be of interest to a certain individuals, the fact that these Categories/Sections exist confirm the fact that they are of interest to at least some Wikipedia users, and the same is true for 'Category:Welsh-speaking people'. I hope that the majority of Wikipedia users/editors wish to build a more informative and inclusive encyclopaedia, and not an encyclopaedia that projects an Anglo-American bias whereby smaller cultures and languages are dismissed. I therefore call upon those who instigated this deletion to see beyond their possible prejudices, and remain true to by re-instating this category without further delay please as many useful links have been lost with the current deletion.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
680,436,001	Professional Wikipedia bureaucrats like you and the ignorant busybody who reported me are precisely what's wrong with this site today and one of the major reasons why few people around the world have any faith in the accuracy of Wikipedia articles. Knowledgeable, productive editors like me are persecuted by know-nothings who are more expert at taking advantage of WP's byzantine bureaucracy than any particular field of study. Congratulations on making this site that much worse.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
680,453,221	== Hoosac Tunnel == I'm trying to improve the article, and your first comment is a direct criticism. Get with the collaborative nature of this project or simply get lost. Editors like you have no place in this community. Work with everyone, and don't work against people.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
680,482,390	LOL - you people are absolutely insane.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
680,539,470	:::::Without wishing to seem belligerent, I think my version, the second quote, is better. I honestly don't see any problem with it, so I can't propose an alteration to it. I thought I answered your concern.	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
680,542,831	== Why no wind? == If the Earth is travelling along at 67,000 miles an hour, how come on a still day we don't feel any wind?	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
680,542,966	And how come the Earth's atmosphere doesn't all just blow away, with all this force presumably being exerted on it?	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
680,544,451	::::::The first quote is imprecise, as it allows the implication that her demeanour was part of the reason for her arrest. The second quote grammatically excludes this implication. Also, the use of wiki voice to imply certainty regarding the reason for her arrest is inappropriate. I don't know why your not seeing that. Your third quote removes the unintended implication, but retains the unwarranted and somewhat offensive authoritative tone regarding the reason for her arrest. It is also significantly longer and doesn't read as well. It's barely if at all an improvement on the first quote (though it removes the grammatical shortcomings) and far worse than the second quote, which I still don't see any problem with.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
680,544,744	. It will have to do I suppose	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
680,548,177	::::::::That is an improvement. I'm glad I could be of help.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
680,553,439	:So what? Go away and stop harassing me. You're a bully and a stalker.-	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
680,571,511	: It's funny- when people have kicked up a fuss in the past, I've sometimes had some sympathy for their concerns, sometimes not, but I have nonetheless typically found them to be very difficult people. This time, despite the fact that I'm struggling to understand what precisely the objection is, I see that it's coming from people with whom I've had perfectly cordial interactions in the past. I fear that people are talking at cross-purposes; there doesn't seem to be much mutual understanding.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
680,584,774	` ::I understand the reasoning, although I don't agree, and I'm not sure you actually agree with undeleting this (your post makes it seem like ``the rules say I must undelete it, so I did, even though I think it's a bad article``). `	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
680,609,995	` :Obvious troll is obvious. `	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
680,628,871	`:If instead of spending all the time and energy you just put into nominating that article for AfD, subsequently coming here to publicize that AfD nomination, and then retracting it again once you saw the jig was up, you could instead have sourced and expanded it yourself, and still had time left over to watch a couple of reruns of MAS*H. Just sayin', that's all. But congratulations on taking the normal controversial ``should I revert unsourced material or just add a 'citation needed' tag`` to a whole new level ... now it's should I add a 'cn', revert, or nominate for AfD and bitch about it on JW's Talk page. I guess someone will have to go and update the WP:BDR and WP:GOFIXIT guidance to include your new innovative approach. — not really here `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
680,629,110	}} tag but did not ask a question. Please write out your question and replace the tag when you are done, and someone will be along to help. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the Teahouse, the help desk, or join Wikipedia's Live Help IRC channel to get real-time assistance. Click here for instant access.	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
680,637,851	Literature reviews of academic definition: Workplace romance is defined as a mutually desired relationship that includes physical attraction between two members of the same organization (Quinn, 1977; Foley and Powell 1999; Pierce, 1998). Workplace romance is consensual and mutually welcomed (Clarke 2006). Workplace romances are characterized by desiring to be with the other person and feelings of emotional and physical attraction, which may lead to a sharing of personal information, mutual caring and respect, and quite likely sexual behavior such as touching, kissing and hugging, and sexual intercourse (Pierce et al, 1996). Working together allows people to get to know each other; and as familiarity grows, workplace romances may be more likely to occur. These relationships may form between peer co-workers, supervisors, subordinates, or even with company clients (Rabin-Margaloith 2006). 679674 MGMT	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
680,642,427	== Battleground spirit ; removal of source material == I ask you to stop harassing me: or I will report you.	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
680,642,851	== Paid editing ; former editing on wp == Hello, Could you please tell us * if you have ever edited wikipedia before with another account ? * if you are paid for editing wikipedia ? Thank you.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
680,644,118	` == vague emptiness == The article is vague and does not say anything meaningful. From an Abrahmis perspective it is possible to say how Judaism differes from Christianity and within Christianity Protestant from Catholic with specific doctrinal examples e.g. transubstantiantion and what thet means. WHY can someone who is familiar with this subject not do the same for these schools. At present all you can see are arguements about if Pali or Sanskrit is the correct etymology, BUT nothing about what are the differences in a supposedyl heretical group or school or label. The word ``some`` is used, very vague how many? of what degree? and what kind of differences? How can anyone spend so much time writing this ENCYCLOPEDIC article without the slighetest idea of how buddhism may vary between adherants rather than arhants beggars belief.`	2,015	false	article	random	train	false
680,650,089	::I understand that you refuse to tell us ::* if you edited before, which is your right at some conditions: Wikipedia:Clean start#Notification and permission that I fear that you don't comply with; ::* if you are paid or not despite Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. ::Your comments about me are in infraction with WP:AGF. ::	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
680,658,460	::No response. I've taken it back to the last uncontested version. I'm very sorry if this involves any baby/bathwater transactions but it's difficult to sort out the threads or what was good and what was less so. We could always have another try if problems like those mentioned above can be avoided? Best wishes to all	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
680,688,993	` == Use of ``America`` when the meaning is ``United States`` == You are correct, that one irks me so whenever I see it I change it ) In school, the difference between America and the United States was beaten into our heads. America is two continents. The United States is one country. There is no country or nation named ``America``. So when someone puts ``Nationality - American`` , well, what does that tell us ? He's not European or Russian, I guess. But he she or it could be from Guatemala, Venezuela, Costa Rica, Peru or thirty other countries. The use of ``American`` in that way is flat-out wrong. And becoming more and more common, alas ! You are correct, occasionally using 'United States' becomes very cumbersome in a sentence. As an occasionality, what the heck. But we really need to stomp on this total misuse of the name ``America`` when people really mean ``United States.`` Today's schools just have a heck of a lot to answer for ( `	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
680,689,198	== Tweet == A little birdie chirped your name.	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
680,696,517	` === Discussion habits food USA === American eating habits owe a great deal to that of their British culinary roots with some variations. Although American lands could grow newer vegetables England could not, most colonists would not eat these new foods until accepted by Europeans. The source here is to a broken link. The link is to a page where I can buy a book. Not an actual source, there's no proof and all that this quote is in the book. I have researched this independently on my own and have not found anything of the sort related to this material. This is an opinionated argument and not a fact you can easily look up. The source does not share this quote or fact; it isn't in it from any link posted and is in fact a broken source and a link that does not lead to the information written. I recommend deleting this post until the user or whoever has written it can find identifiable information by a credible source leading to the statement. It does not further the page or help anyone understand anything about this topic nor is credible or have any identifiable backing of any kind.`	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
680,696,695	``` is what I deleted`	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
680,702,061	` == ``You could have any man you want. Why would you take mine?`` == While this quote/anecdote from Michelle Phillips quoting Mama Cass is very tasty (``You could have any man you want. Why would you take mine?``), it really doesn't have anything to do with John Phillips. I am more than reluctant to remove it myself, however. `	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
680,721,058	` :I'll take a look later. Hmm, after I figure out why there are two of them. I guess it comes from the top that we have to use ``affiliation`` in such a weird and unnatural way. `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
680,721,886	: More numbers. * Death in Venice: 84:59 ~3:2 * The Turn of the Screw: 133:70 ~2:1 * The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde: 309:121 ~5:2 * Armageddon 2419 A.D.: 3:2	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
680,749,208	::read what I say and understand my meaning - if you continue to harass me, it is your ass that is grass - I've violated no policies - you have. LEAVE ME BE.	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
680,749,268	Don't leave any more harassing messages on my page.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
680,749,375	`The definition of genre warrior is YOU. I am not ``warring`` shit. I am adding sources for genres already existing. You are pushing your own opinion as fact. And I will destroy you if you continue to thwart me. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	true
680,749,887	:::Please stop leaving messages on my talk page. I will have you banned for your abuse.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
680,749,933	and targeting of me for false reasons	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false

679,778,836

` ::Thank you for the info . I had no idea that outing was against policy, and I apologize for violating policy. It is my hope that will cease his megalomaniacal control over all other opinions at Cooper Union financial crisis and tuition protests. I will certainly not out him again on wiki, and it is my hope that he will move on to other articles. I see that this user is involved in a proposed amendment to WP:ADMIN regarding . Beyond My Ken ought set example for ensuring no admins are paid for their services, but he is far too close to CUfcatp to be an objective editor as he has lorded over the article for nearly 2 years. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

679,790,883

== I have my payback. == I will get you.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

679,813,074

`Notice that her own widely-read book is not mentioned in References. And look at the reference that is there. Who's behind all this elaborate smear? ``Anti=semitism``? Accused by whom? why? I wouldn't edit this entry on a dare... [[Wetman} I agree - I also think this run-on should be deleted, but fear editing it. ``The state and nature of their marriage has been the subject of much speculation, with some claiming it is a purely political arrangement and widespread stories about their regular arguments, but the fact remains that they have remained together (and whilst spending extended periods apart still vacation together, apparently) long after the political necessity for the marriage to stay together passed.`` I think it's repetitive of the sentence before, and somewhat inappropriate. ==US Senator==/== Senate Election (2000) == Question: has Hillary done anything noteworthy as a senator yet? 01:09 Oct 9, 2002 (UTC) :I did try to include a header on this, but it was removed by Salazar. This does need research & inclusion. It says in the article that she campaigned heavily in Upstate New York. She campaigned in heavily Democratic areas of New York, like Albany, but the traditionally Republican areas in Upstate New York really didn't have a candidate: Lazio is a RINO; he likes government-run social programs, he supports abortion, he's antigun, etc. I remember reading in the Press & Sun-Bulletin (a Binghamton-area newspaper), that her campaign aides had determined that downstate was such an easy sell for her, that she only needed around 30% of the vote in Upstate. (I think she got 32% or so in my county Wolfman, obviously I don't object to the editing in principle, and you and I have made some opposite kinds of edits to other political articles, with an appropriate degree of attention to NPOV, but I think with respect to your changes to my Senate section Edit, you kept the facts I inserted that were favorable to Sen. Clinton (ie, ``Two-thirds of the voters dismissed the carpetbagging issue,``) but removed much of the factual information that portrayed her in a negative light (specifically, the objective fact that she returned a $50,000 campaign donation from the Muslim group accused of terrorist connections, and the kissing of Arafat's wife). These events actually figured into the campaign and they are actual facts, not POV. And I was careful I thought to avoid implying that these events were evidence of anything (which is a POV), I just stated the fact that they were part of the Republican attacks on her, which is objective. I'd appreciate some reply but I'll give it some time before attempting to revise my section. == Page moved == See ==Neutrality== This page doesn't mention Whitewater or her role in the health care plan, two of the things she's most famous for. Also, some of the prose is fairly fawning; e.g., ``the two were soon inseperablepartners in moot court, political campaigns, and matters of the heart``. Needs a neutral party to go over this and add facts, NPOV. I don't know enough to do it. Again, if you feel it is NPOV, add the White Water and healtcare section. It is not that hard, it is on the Bill Clinton page. ChrisDJackson Well, as I said, I don't really know enough about this topic, I was just drawing attention to this for others who might be able to help the article. I dispute the neutrality of this page. Do I know enough to fix it? Not really. But even so, you have no right to remove the header. Thank you. Please do not remove the Neutrality Dispute header. I'm in the process of finding people to correct this, but you have no right to remove it. ==Signature== I removed Hillary's signature from the page. If it's going to be re-added, at least put it off to the side with a caption. As it was it looked like an attempt at making it look like she signed the page. But since I'm not sure her signature is relevant in the first place, I removed it rather than fixing it. ==Naming the husband==N

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

679,831,498

:::***I don't give a fuck. I just want to point out that responding to you casting aspersions like the above, and your previous comment, and most of your recent comments in fact, is not baiting.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

679,832,272

You were and are hopelessly mistaken about that. Not much point going into it - it's not rocket science. It is an obvious and necessary improvement). You can disagree, but calling it baiting is irrational.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

679,840,463

` == Infobox == Was she really ``active`` up until 2015? `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

679,848,638

== Reddit == Someone on reddit said you and Ryulong were a couple. Is it true?

2,015

false

user

blocked

test

false

679,852,559

` :There is no such word in Latin. Are you thinking of Latin artus ``joint, sinew, limbs``? Regardless, it is highly unlikely that this is the source of the Welsh name Arthur. ~~~~ `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

679,852,702

` == Etymology== There might be another possible etymology source. Arthur, from Latin Artu, ``Strongarm``, the latin equivalent of Breifbras, Caradoc's epithet. see section 5, http://levigilant.com/Bulfinch_Mythology/bulfinch.englishatheist.org/arthur/Caradoc-Vreichvras.htm

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

679,858,929

:::::::::::Just FYI, on the French wiki, we finally chose to talk about proto-State. Palestine has numerous features of a State (starting by recognition) but lack some others (eg a define territory and a control of this). It is a State de jure -partly- but not really de facto -with some exception-. So it is a State in building: a proto-State. :::::::::::Some sources (in French) use that wording. I don't know in English. :::::::::::

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

679,868,285

==Some More International Newspapers headlines== * click * Click * Click * Click * Click * Click So the story isnt that as being portrayed by my dear friends in this article.

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

679,874,485

, 7 September 2015 (UTC) ::::I don’t know if you’re currently able to edit your own Talk, but if you are: I’ve edited that notice of mine. Is it less confusing now? Thanks. — 09:42

2,015

false

user

random

test

false

679,885,228

Machine (hardware platform)|Steam

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

679,950,822

` :If anyone at any point wishes to make a go at creating a critical reception section, then sources are hidden under the Principal roles and cast members section.. I added the sources thinking I would have a go at creating this section, however it is not something I am very good at. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

679,951,012

` ::::No problem. Don't forget to drop a note regardless, when you have the BRFA and when you have gotten the bot approved.—:Online `

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

679,951,082

` == Critical Reception == If anyone at any point wishes to make a go at expanding the critical reception section, then a wide range of sources are hidden under the section header. I added the sources thinking I would have a go at creating this section, however it is not something I am very good at. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

679,954,006

` == Critical Reception == If anyone at any point wishes to make a go at expanding the critical reception section, then a wide range of sources are hidden under the section header. I added the sources thinking I would have a go at creating this section, however it is not something I am very good at. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

679,974,513

` == West Europe vs. Western Europe == , perhaps you're used to the using the adjective westeuropäisch in German. I wish we spoke German, because it is much easier to understand the difference between what is correct or incorrect. To speak of English though, the overwhelming number of examples I've seen tend to have instances of ``Western European`` sooner than ``West European.`` If you look at work done on Wikipedia, you will see the majority of editors prefer the term ``Western European`` over ``West European.`` `

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

679,978,661

``` (for example, Western European Union).`

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

679,985,727

Now that I have created an account will I have the privilege to edit locked pages, or is this something that is granted over time?

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

679,992,085

` ::::::::forgot you were ``there``, bad time for attempt at a joke `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

679,993,568

` : Lad, you've been edit warring for more than a decade - as , then now this account. Every time inevitably you exhaust the community's patience, disappear for a bit then come back with a ``clean`` account. When's it going to click that the behavior needs to change not just the account name? For your sake and everyone's take a step back and honestly think about how you interact with people and how it might improve. Cheers. `

2,015

false

user

blocked

test

false

679,994,409

` == Denali == Don’t know whether you’re aware but this editor isn’t interested in compromise. He’s been edit warring for more than a decade - as , then now this account. Every time inevitably he exhausts the community's patience, disappears for a bit then comes back with a ``clean`` account. Not sure when it's going to click that the behavior needs to change not the account name. Anyway, I don't think trying to reason with him's going to work but good luck. `

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

679,995,443

How's that? I'm restoring an editor's comment which another editor removed. I'm familiar with the WP:NPA policy and it didn't run afoul. What's the issue?

2,015

false

user

blocked

test

false

679,996,491

` : Isn't that exactly the point? One's ``perception`` is not necessarily the reality of the situation. I can be looking at a doughnut and, in my perception, it is a canary. That's just my perception. In reality, it is a doughnut, regardless of my perspective and regardless of what I think it is. No? `

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

679,996,585

My thinking that it is a doughnut does not, in fact, make the canary become a doughnut. Right?

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

680,055,907

== lede == The video was originally posted to ebaumsworld prior to youtube existing, maybe a note of it's origins is warrented?

2,015

false

article

blocked

test

false

680,056,179

` == This article should be named ``Mega Drive`` == The name ``Genesis`` was only used in North America and isn't the common name for the system. `

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

680,065,690

` ::I just checked myself and found another possible source of confusion, please note that ``Thad Caldwell`` is my writing pseudonym (combining the names of my favorite authors) that I was previously using as my signature before having it changed to ``TJC-tennis-geek``. You can verify that using my user page from when I had issues with my signature. Thanks. `

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

680,095,237

:::Denial is a river in Africa. Denali is a mountain in Alaska.

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

680,109,311

:Hello, around 50 % resettled in the territory of former Mandatory Palestine and around 50 % outside (Lebanon, Syria, Egypt and Jordan).

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

680,116,652

How can this be justified?

2,015

false

user

blocked

test

false

680,116,717

someone who is behaving

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

680,117,953

` This is not a personal attack as it clearly discusses behaviour as opposed to the ``individual`` so not a personal attack ... Read the unblock and review the actions that led to a one month block, I think you will be surprised`

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

680,119,056

You clearly need to read the blocking rules... 1 month ban for telling someone he worships the devil? seriously is wikipedia now run by the church? Do us a favour and dont be an idiot.

2,015

false

user

blocked

dev

false

680,119,420

Fucking cabal of donkey raping shit eaters I hope you all get cancer.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

true

680,150,106

== The original Columbia Municipal == WeirdI always assumed that Columbia Municipal Stadium as originally built in 1934 is essentially the lower half of the current Williams-Brice Stadium's grandstands. How's that not the casejust because one grandstand was completely rebuilt?

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

680,159,086

:: What are the BLP reasons for the generic question that had nothing to do with Clinton?

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

680,159,694

== Help request == I'd like to request help from an Admin. Thanks.

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

680,160,156

That is not my question. Re-read the question. And stop imputing your own interpretation.

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

680,174,973

::::The fact that Regavim is not a settlement but is a NGO is not a matter here. ::::The reasons to give both the pov of the International Law and Israel is to comply with NPoV and the wording that are used were based on discussions to avoid edit wars on the topic. ::::It is relevant here given Regavim (NGO) defends the point of view of the settlers and emphasize the legal aspects. ::::That's totally obivous. I add that you asked for a source that was talking about Regavim in this context and you was provided by me here above. I will not write this a 3rd time. ::::

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

680,178,386

` == NPoV == @ In this article that you created, you wrote ``(...) pray at the compound``. That's not exactly what the source says. Would you mind reporting the statu quo that has been negociated between Jewih religious authorities and Waqf, as well as between Jordan and Israeli authorities regarding the management of the ``al-Haram al-Sharif / Temple Mount``. That's an important background in order to understand the situation. Of course, would some group contests this, that should reported too. I could not find this in the source ``funded by the northern branch of Israel’s Islamic Movement``. The reference to Isrel is amazing and in any case requires a very good sources with information cross-checking. I wonder if the use of ``Jewish extremists`` and ``activists`` is appropriate here. Given the sources are highly poved (not to say not wp:rs) this should be contextualized at minimum. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

680,179,601

` :: Being opposed to LGBT philosophy or movement doesn't make somebody an ``homophobe``. Exactly as defending Israel policies doesn't make somebody a racist or being opposed to Judaism doesn't make somebody an ``antisemite``. ::NB: Settleman, from recently you have started adding material from both sides but you don't comply with NPoV yet anyway. You have some ideas of what is the pov of opponents to some Israeli policies but when you write an article on such a topic, it is not enough to google for some articles about what they say. You have to understand their arguments as well as you understand those that you share/listen day-to-day and put all of them in article in order that everybody understand them. You also have to introduce their arguments ``fairly`` so that they can be understood. ::The big issue [for you] will be that on the statistical point of view, you should face 50% of time arguments from the other side partly stronger than the ones you believe in. How will you manage this if your are pro-Israel and revendicate this or the right to be so on wp ? ::As a good start you could start by trying to understand the Muslim and the Palestinian point of view regarding al-Haram al-Sharif / Temple Mount and introducing this on the article your recently created. :: `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

680,183,379

== Manika == Hello Ritchie333, why should I be lucky? I deleted the vandalism from the . This was not a silly edit war.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

680,193,668

` :The citation for the first sentence shows pictures of something that resembles some sorts of animals of which some might be of dogs, if you use your imagination. I dispute that they, and the picture under this section, represent saluki-like hounds. Similarly for the pottery mentioned in the second sentence, plus the Egyptian tombs reference is mentioned further in the section. The third sentence mentions links with the Avesta, Bible and Koran but offers nothing regarding chapter, verse or sutra. The Koran extract makes no mention of saluki-like hounds, it refers to the ``hunting animals``. Therefore, I am removing these 3 sentences as they do not meet WP:CITE. I have issues with other parts of this section, perhaps editors might like to review their contribution for quality. • • `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

680,200,419

` == Often == there is no evidence for the article to state that Orange Order parades have ``often`` led to violence. The two sources don't mention it, indeed they only refer to two separate incidences in Belfast over the past year or two. The reasoning of past tense is also tenuous seeing as ``have sometimes`` is also past tense. Out of the vast number of Orange Order parades a year (well over a thousand, including main demonstration and feeder), very few have any disturbances, and when they do happen it is almost always in Belfast (and usually a feeder parade of a couple of lodges), either near the Short Strand or Ardoyne. Stating ``sometimes`` better reflects the reality as it is not as common as the press and republicans would have people believe. How many Orange Order parades and 12ths through mainly nationalist towns have led to violence? Even during the Troubles it is in the minority. So unless you can reliably source that it ``often`` has led to violence, then the article should not state it as it is implying that it happens a lot when in reality in terms of the number of parades, it doesn't really. `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

680,209,297

` :::::::I didn't claim to be a new user. Do you want to be applauded for your bad decision-making, or are you just unwilling to apologize for it, or even admit to it? Can I count on this much hand-wringing and dumb scrutiny for every single innocuous, obviously valid and easily verifiable edit I make, or have you now added me to a whitelist of ``acceptable users`` who are allowed to edit Wikipedia on your watch? :::::::You want to see arrogance? Look in the mirror, dispense with the veiled threats, and stop trying to justify conduct for which you ought to be apologizing. `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

680,217,115

== Figures == In a previous version of this article, it says that Saudi Arabia has offered $476 million to Syrian Refugees, in a later version, $280 million is mentioned. Which is correct?

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

680,219,228

::: Thanks. And fuck you.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

680,222,474

== Deletion discussion about J Money Ca$H Money == Hello, Immaboss1111111, I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether J Money Ca$H Money should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J Money Ca$H Money . If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top. Thanks,

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

680,225,624

:Erm, thanks. Please explain why

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

680,230,005

` :Ah. I only noticed where it says at the top ``Note: happens at about 17:30 Britain time.`` Now I see the ``Marking as Ready``. Doh. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

680,231,929

think there are better alternatives than not having any criteria for including anyone,

2,015

false

article

random

train

false

680,237,092

` ::There are so many things wrong here that I really don't even know where to begin. 1. The comments were obviously directed at ME, since they were left on the top of MY talk page and referred to ME as a ``cunt``. It's not the first time that someone has left that kind of vandalism on my talk page. Look at its history. It's people from 4chan targeting me. 2. None of those IP addresses belong to me. If they did, they would have been autoblocked since I was blocked at the time. Also, believe or not, I really do have better things to do than tell myself that I hope I get raped and killed. 3. The fact that you are so paranoid that you actually think that the vandalism on MY talk page is directed at YOU - even though it was AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE - really says it all. 4. You assuming that those vandal IP addresses belong to me is assuming bad faith in the extreme. Don't believe me? Feel free to use Checkuser. I almost cannot believe how absurd and paranoid you are being right now. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

680,237,536

Here is another example.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

680,246,662

` ::This is Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Best known for IP; it's being going on for years. (waves to ) Sadly Wikipedia really lacks a good way of dealing with editors who make good (or at the very least good faith) edits but cannot work with others or accept alternative points of view. We've tried all sorts of things but nothing has stuck. PS: I am a big fan of your edit notice. `

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

680,250,229

` == ArbCom questions / discussion == Hello Guerillero, You wrote this: :I am reading evidence as it comes it and trying to make it more of a discussion of what is going on than a one way evidence dump that the arbs read and act on. While questions are directed to a particular editor anyone can answer them. Note, please do not use this as a place to argue, debate or rehash conflicts. If you disagree with someone's response, post your answer. Guerillero | Parlez Moi Could you please tell where we can answer to you ? Is this just ``below`` your question or is it somewhere else ? `

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

680,272,060

:::Indeed it does.

2,015

false

user

random

train

false

680,313,771

:::::::::: I see nothing in this, so what's your point?

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

680,315,006

== Celtic languages == Hi, could you please consider interceding on the Celtic languages article? A few editors, including the notorious troublemaker , are edit warring with me in order to remove a perfectly accurate map of the modern Celtic countries with shaded regions for where Celtic languages are still actively spoken - all because one of these editors - who clearly doesn't have much knowledge of Celtic languages - said he didn't understand the map. This editor, has even reported me to WP for reverting the removal of the map.

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

680,319,534

== Tags on article == Yeah, this article is very poor. Un cited material, I'd say this is more of a coat racking venture than anything else. I'd like to see this nominated for deletion. Awful, even by Wikipedia standards. This article is tagged for a reason, please fix it.

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

680,324,955

I'm thinking of moving this page to List of fictional demons and devils and then adding additional items like that guy from Devil's Advocate (movie), Louis Cipher from Angel Heart, the devil from South Park, etc... Objections?

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

680,351,942

Fuck off back to India you cunt.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

true

680,390,813

== List of Days of Our Lives characters == Your recent move of this page was reverted by another editor. Do you want to open a move discussion? The template is available. Thank you,

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

680,399,720

` ::::Thanks. I was on the way to doing that myself, but it would take me awhile. The links for ``Weekend Update`` really shouldn't be repeated per WP:REPEATLINK. Also, the use of small font should be avoided there per MOS:FONTSIZE, but I won't push the issue. `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

680,414,211

` Pinging the blocking admin for review. `

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

680,420,425

== Welsh-speaking people == Given the centuries of persecution suffered by Welsh-speakers (just read the history - it makes for shocking reading), the fact that the Welsh language still exists as a living language is nothing short of a miracle. Naturally therefore, it is of much interest to those interested in the Welsh language, those interested in Welsh current affairs, those interested in minority languages as well as to many members of the public in general, for it to be acknowledged that certain notable public figures e.g. politicians, sportspeople or musicians have the ability to speak Welsh. Indeed, failing to do so seems to suggest that the Welsh language is of no significance, to anybody. Whilst some may argue that the language that one speaks is not actually significant, this viewpoint is likely to be prevalent in individuals with a limited understanding of minority languages/cultures. Put another way, whilst the fact that a notable person can speak English may not be necessarily of interest - mainly due to the fact that English is the third most widely-spoken language in the world - by contrast, when a notable person who happens also to speak Welsh is not acknowledged as a Welsh speaker this is missing a very important point, simply because Welsh is much less prevalent than English. Yes, defining a cohort of Welsh-speaking people is of interest to many people, even if that does not happen to include the person(s) who instigated the deletion of this category in the first place. Therefore, just as the section 'Notable people with the name Prabhu', or 'Category:Black British people', for example, may not be of interest to a certain individuals, the fact that these Categories/Sections exist confirm the fact that they are of interest to at least some Wikipedia users, and the same is true for 'Category:Welsh-speaking people'. I hope that the majority of Wikipedia users/editors wish to build a more informative and inclusive encyclopaedia, and not an encyclopaedia that projects an Anglo-American bias whereby smaller cultures and languages are dismissed. I therefore call upon those who instigated this deletion to see beyond their possible prejudices, and remain true to by re-instating this category without further delay please as many useful links have been lost with the current deletion.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

680,436,001

Professional Wikipedia bureaucrats like you and the ignorant busybody who reported me are precisely what's wrong with this site today and one of the major reasons why few people around the world have any faith in the accuracy of Wikipedia articles. Knowledgeable, productive editors like me are persecuted by know-nothings who are more expert at taking advantage of WP's byzantine bureaucracy than any particular field of study. Congratulations on making this site that much worse.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

680,453,221

== Hoosac Tunnel == I'm trying to improve the article, and your first comment is a direct criticism. Get with the collaborative nature of this project or simply get lost. Editors like you have no place in this community. Work with everyone, and don't work against people.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

680,482,390

LOL - you people are absolutely insane.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

680,539,470

:::::Without wishing to seem belligerent, I think my version, the second quote, is better. I honestly don't see any problem with it, so I can't propose an alteration to it. I thought I answered your concern.

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

680,542,831

== Why no wind? == If the Earth is travelling along at 67,000 miles an hour, how come on a still day we don't feel any wind?

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

680,542,966

And how come the Earth's atmosphere doesn't all just blow away, with all this force presumably being exerted on it?

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

680,544,451

::::::The first quote is imprecise, as it allows the implication that her demeanour was part of the reason for her arrest. The second quote grammatically excludes this implication. Also, the use of wiki voice to imply certainty regarding the reason for her arrest is inappropriate. I don't know why your not seeing that. Your third quote removes the unintended implication, but retains the unwarranted and somewhat offensive authoritative tone regarding the reason for her arrest. It is also significantly longer and doesn't read as well. It's barely if at all an improvement on the first quote (though it removes the grammatical shortcomings) and far worse than the second quote, which I still don't see any problem with.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

680,544,744

. It will have to do I suppose

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

680,548,177

::::::::That is an improvement. I'm glad I could be of help.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

680,553,439

:So what? Go away and stop harassing me. You're a bully and a stalker.-

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

680,571,511

: It's funny- when people have kicked up a fuss in the past, I've sometimes had some sympathy for their concerns, sometimes not, but I have nonetheless typically found them to be very difficult people. This time, despite the fact that I'm struggling to understand what precisely the objection is, I see that it's coming from people with whom I've had perfectly cordial interactions in the past. I fear that people are talking at cross-purposes; there doesn't seem to be much mutual understanding.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

680,584,774

` ::I understand the reasoning, although I don't agree, and I'm not sure you actually agree with undeleting this (your post makes it seem like ``the rules say I must undelete it, so I did, even though I think it's a bad article``). `

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

680,609,995

` :Obvious troll is obvious. `

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

680,628,871

`:If instead of spending all the time and energy you just put into nominating that article for AfD, subsequently coming here to publicize that AfD nomination, and then retracting it again once you saw the jig was up, you could instead have sourced and expanded it yourself, and still had time left over to watch a couple of reruns of M*A*S*H. Just sayin', that's all. But congratulations on taking the normal controversial ``should I revert unsourced material or just add a 'citation needed' tag`` to a whole new level ... now it's should I add a 'cn', revert, or nominate for AfD and bitch about it on JW's Talk page. I guess someone will have to go and update the WP:BDR and WP:GOFIXIT guidance to include your new innovative approach. — not really here `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

680,629,110

}} tag but did not ask a question. Please write out your question and replace the tag when you are done, and someone will be along to help. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the Teahouse, the help desk, or join Wikipedia's Live Help IRC channel to get real-time assistance. Click here for instant access.

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

680,637,851

Literature reviews of academic definition: Workplace romance is defined as a mutually desired relationship that includes physical attraction between two members of the same organization (Quinn, 1977; Foley and Powell 1999; Pierce, 1998). Workplace romance is consensual and mutually welcomed (Clarke 2006). Workplace romances are characterized by desiring to be with the other person and feelings of emotional and physical attraction, which may lead to a sharing of personal information, mutual caring and respect, and quite likely sexual behavior such as touching, kissing and hugging, and sexual intercourse (Pierce et al, 1996). Working together allows people to get to know each other; and as familiarity grows, workplace romances may be more likely to occur. These relationships may form between peer co-workers, supervisors, subordinates, or even with company clients (Rabin-Margaloith 2006). 679674 MGMT

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

680,642,427

== Battleground spirit ; removal of source material == I ask you to stop harassing me: or I will report you.

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

680,642,851

== Paid editing ; former editing on wp == Hello, Could you please tell us * if you have ever edited wikipedia before with another account ? * if you are paid for editing wikipedia ? Thank you.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

680,644,118

` == vague emptiness == The article is vague and does not say anything meaningful. From an Abrahmis perspective it is possible to say how Judaism differes from Christianity and within Christianity Protestant from Catholic with specific doctrinal examples e.g. transubstantiantion and what thet means. WHY can someone who is familiar with this subject not do the same for these schools. At present all you can see are arguements about if Pali or Sanskrit is the correct etymology, BUT nothing about what are the differences in a supposedyl heretical group or school or label. The word ``some`` is used, very vague how many? of what degree? and what kind of differences? How can anyone spend so much time writing this ENCYCLOPEDIC article without the slighetest idea of how buddhism may vary between adherants rather than arhants beggars belief.`

2,015

false

article

random

train

false

680,650,089

::I understand that you refuse to tell us ::* if you edited before, which is your right at some conditions: Wikipedia:Clean start#Notification and permission that I fear that you don't comply with; ::* if you are paid or not despite Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. ::Your comments about me are in infraction with WP:AGF. ::

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

680,658,460

::No response. I've taken it back to the last uncontested version. I'm very sorry if this involves any baby/bathwater transactions but it's difficult to sort out the threads or what was good and what was less so. We could always have another try if problems like those mentioned above can be avoided? Best wishes to all

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

680,688,993

` == Use of ``America`` when the meaning is ``United States`` == You are correct, that one irks me so whenever I see it I change it ) In school, the difference between America and the United States was beaten into our heads. America is two continents. The United States is one country. There is no country or nation named ``America``. So when someone puts ``Nationality - American`` , well, what does that tell us ? He's not European or Russian, I guess. But he she or it could be from Guatemala, Venezuela, Costa Rica, Peru or thirty other countries. The use of ``American`` in that way is flat-out wrong. And becoming more and more common, alas ! You are correct, occasionally using 'United States' becomes very cumbersome in a sentence. As an occasionality, what the heck. But we really need to stomp on this total misuse of the name ``America`` when people really mean ``United States.`` Today's schools just have a heck of a lot to answer for ( `

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

680,689,198

== Tweet == A little birdie chirped your name.

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

680,696,517

` === Discussion habits food USA === American eating habits owe a great deal to that of their British culinary roots with some variations. Although American lands could grow newer vegetables England could not, most colonists would not eat these new foods until accepted by Europeans. The source here is to a broken link. The link is to a page where I can buy a book. Not an actual source, there's no proof and all that this quote is in the book. I have researched this independently on my own and have not found anything of the sort related to this material. This is an opinionated argument and not a fact you can easily look up. The source does not share this quote or fact; it isn't in it from any link posted and is in fact a broken source and a link that does not lead to the information written. I recommend deleting this post until the user or whoever has written it can find identifiable information by a credible source leading to the statement. It does not further the page or help anyone understand anything about this topic nor is credible or have any identifiable backing of any kind.`

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

680,696,695

``` is what I deleted`

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

680,702,061

` == ``You could have any man you want. Why would you take mine?`` == While this quote/anecdote from Michelle Phillips quoting Mama Cass is very tasty (``You could have any man you want. Why would you take mine?``), it really doesn't have anything to do with John Phillips. I am more than reluctant to remove it myself, however. `

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

680,721,058

` :I'll take a look later. Hmm, after I figure out why there are two of them. I guess it comes from the top that we have to use ``affiliation`` in such a weird and unnatural way. `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

680,721,886

: More numbers. * Death in Venice: 84:59 ~3:2 * The Turn of the Screw: 133:70 ~2:1 * The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde: 309:121 ~5:2 * Armageddon 2419 A.D.: 3:2

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

680,749,208

::read what I say and understand my meaning - if you continue to harass me, it is your ass that is grass - I've violated no policies - you have. LEAVE ME BE.

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

680,749,268

Don't leave any more harassing messages on my page.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

680,749,375

`The definition of genre warrior is YOU. I am not ``warring`` shit. I am adding sources for genres already existing. You are pushing your own opinion as fact. And I will destroy you if you continue to thwart me. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

true

680,749,887

:::Please stop leaving messages on my talk page. I will have you banned for your abuse.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

680,749,933

and targeting of me for false reasons

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false