dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
680,765,293	:Adjusted wording to reflect your reading of the decision.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
680,794,190	` == RfC: (Policy) Using bad practices from one article to justify another and possible sock puppetry; and (Politics) Acceptability of aggregated data in ``Election Results`` section == ====Policy==== While not getting into the issue of reverting edits without first reaching out to the original editor to understand their motivation (in this case, the deletion of a table), justifies the reversion of my deletion by pointing to other articles with the same flawed table...which he created! Examples: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Papineau_%28electoral_district%29&diff;=prev&oldid;=654041277 - the above article https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ottawa_South&diff;=prev&oldid;=593333525 - Ottawa South https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Edmonton_Strathcona&diff;=636097681&oldid;=622403799 - Edmonton Strathcona While we're on this topic, I found an identical table with identical formatting and citation in Toronto Centre...but added by ! https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Toronto_Centre&oldid;=670004225 This strikes me as possible sock puppetry. I'm hoping a more sophisticated WP editor can either confirm or deny my hypothesis. Earl Andrew already admitted to working as a polling firm employee in Ottawa. It seems likely the same user is responsible not only for adding the content cited, but actually generating it in meatspace. This in itself wouldn't make the content non-NPOV, though one has to wonder why Earl Andrew guards Canadian electoral district pages so jealously (including the ``Political Geography`` sections which he invented, the topic of our last edit war). Articles about Canadian electoral districts are not Earl Andrew's soapbox and should not be treated as such. Further, in the edit history of every single article mentioned above (only a handful, but statistically, that makes the following more damning), Earl Andrew and Fungus Guy are responsible for the lion's share of edits. While I understand that topics as specialized as Canadian politics may have only a handful of active editors, this appears to be a suspicious pattern and should be treated with all due seriousness. ====Politics==== 's ``Redistributed results`` tables and the identical table added by , are composed of data aggregated from Elections Canada results. I take no issue with the data, but being aggregated, they are no longer results. As such, they should at least be moved into a more relevant section with an explanation, if not removed altogether. Putting the table in the ``Election results`` section implies they are Elections Canada tallies, quite possibly having the effect of misinforming voters. And we're right in the middle of an election campaign! ====Unsorted==== I could have done a lot more editing in the past 4+ years, but instead shied away from larger and more time-consuming edits and rewrites because I felt the end result might be another ``100,000 Edit Man`` coming out of the woodwork to stifle me. When more voluminous editors are allowed to browbeat others into submission because they generate a lot of ``content`` or have a page full of barnstars, it necessarily degrades the quality of WP by reducing the number of editors. It's hard enough to fight the paid corporate trolls on here, dammit! Please advise. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
680,806,374	== Hey f**king swine == Doing bad? Suffering a lot?	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	true
680,826,500	` == Hey f**king swine == Doing bad? Suffering a lot? — Preceding unsigned comment added by `	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	true
680,834,483	==Self-Directed IRA Page== The references on this page were removed and then someone claimed vandalism and the references were added back. The references should be removed as they are there entirely for the promotional purpose of driving traffic to their websites. If you look up their Linked-In pages, you will clearly see the following relationships: Adam Bergman: Associated with IRA Financial Group Bill Humphrey: Associated with New Direction Catherine Wynne: Associated with New Direction Why else would they have references for things like IRS Code 4795 linking to their website instead of the original content on the IRS website? You'll find all links are promotional in nature and need removal. Otherwise, others will submit like references and in 'fairness to all' their references will 'have to stand' if these are not removed. Thanks in advance for taking care of this.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
680,841,471	(I doubt he has much time to read, given his constant presence online.)	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
680,841,678	of Hunley). Neiln has ignored/dismissed every complaint I have made, and made no attempt whatsoever to see my POV	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
680,841,773	p.s. As stated elsewhere, I plan to spend relatively little time on Wikipedia in the near future. I have another life to lead.	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
680,852,556	Hey dog you deserve to be put a leash and beaten.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
680,868,332	== Amen == Nothing •__•	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
680,871,222	:To the former, I don't think it minimizes it at all. To the latter, I don't think you can speak for most readers. Indeed, the fact that the article over the years has evolved to put those specific applications first leads me to conclude that many editors/readers are particularly interested in how artificial turf is used in those particular sports. So, no, it should stay where it is.	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
680,879,451	Thanks Thanks for the redirect link idk there was already a page for this	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
680,895,779	SHUT THE FCK UP FERRET	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	true
680,896,744	== User Ferret is harassing me == He follows me around	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
680,898,028	@neiln he edits every edit I do even the real ones that are truth	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
680,904,729	Could I change it or leave it how it is? I do have a lot of sources that says, Repentless is the 11th studio album by Slayer. ( )	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
680,911,826	:::Yes, I think that it reads much better...though your edit was reverted. I asked that it be brought to the talk page if the editor does not agree with the changes.	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
680,920,045	` :::: WP:NOTAFORUM, WP:SOAPBOX, please stop disrupting the talk page. And yes, they do happen to be prominent historians and political scientists. If you got a problem with that, go and complain about it somewhere else. `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
680,922,853	== why am I blocked? == Why am I blocked and when can I edit again?	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
680,944,166	bitch, asshole, motherfucker, go fuck ur mothers cunt, trade ur wife sister	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	true
680,945,050	== Fuck you asshole == Fucking Bastard you son of a bitch, asshole, motherfucker, go fuck ur mothers cunt, trade ur wife sister	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	true
680,945,219	== arsehole == Fucking Bastard you son of a bitch, asshole, motherfucker, go fuck ur mothers cunt, trade ur wife sister	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	true
680,945,258	== your moms yummy cum == Fucking Bastard you son of a bitch, asshole, motherfucker, go fuck ur mothers cunt, trade ur wife sister	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	true
680,945,306	== your moms yummy cunt == Fucking Bastard you son of a bitch, asshole, motherfucker, go fuck ur mothers cunt, trade ur wife sister	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	true
680,945,721	== Fucking Bastard == you son of a bitch, asshole, motherfucker, go fuck ur mothers cunt, trade ur wife sister	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	true
680,970,040	`::I know this explained in the body of the article, but perhaps a hatnote ``Mantid`` can be included. I only say this because that is the term that I would originally put in the search box if I were looking for information on Mantis. ::Are there redirects to this article? For example, I have seen the spelling 'Preying mantis' used elsewhere. `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
680,976,798	United States courts and judges	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
680,980,781	:::I agreed with The Catalyst31 that some explanation about Mazo Beach being a nudist beach is needed. To put in clothing option without an explanation is equally absurd. There was materials about Mazo Beach being used as a nudist beach and for several reasons was removed. Cited materials about Mazo Beach being a nudist beach is needed. Thank you-	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
680,988,997	:: So which article is true?	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
681,011,857	Please also feel free to post any general suggestions and/or ideas that pertain to any page I've edited, but be polite please ) ==Comments start here==	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
681,014,542	== Vermont! == Where the liberal lunatics go. The only state that could qualify as a gigantic asylum.	2,015	false	article	blocked	dev	false
681,050,322	But your point holds no weight. As long as production codes say that each episode is one length or two-length, then it should be counted as such.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
681,060,371	REDIRECT Draft:Giuseppe Galante: Musician	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
681,074,136	` *Oppose Per everything that has already been said. Harry used a period, reliable sources use a period, and therefore the article uses a period. `	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
681,096,604	` :::::::::Sadly, I haven't left myself with much time tonight, but I think there's a lot of information that could be trimmed and consolidated. (And not just to avoid copyvio concerns; it would also help with readability.) For example, we don't need to mention each time he made an All-Star team, unless there was something especially noteworthy about a given All-Star game. The player profile section should be sufficient for summarizing such achievements. We don't need to mention every All-NBA selection in the prose, either. A short statement in the player profile section should be good enough. Some of the statistical data mentioned in the prose also seems more important than others; for example, there are various rankings we could do without. '''''' `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
681,101,097	== Re: Creating templates == Re: your message: Templates are pretty much like any other Wikipedia article. You create them in the Template namespace and then transclude them into whatever appropriate article you want to. There is a Help document at Help:Template. The easiest thing to do though is probably just look at one of the existing templates and copy that. I was going to say look at Template:NBA from the article you pointed me to, but that navbox is rather big and can be confusing. You might try looking at Template:Seattle SuperSonics 1978–79 NBA champions or you can read the documentation of Template:Navbox for examples. I suggest experimenting with transclusion within your user space first so that you can see exactly what it does. Create and putt the following into your {{User:Charlesaaronthompson/template}} If you are looking at the source of this message, don't include the nowiki part when you add that to your sandbox. Then go create and put something in it. You will see that whatever you save into will automatically be included within when you view it. You can build your proposed navbox in your user space until you are satisfied with how templates work and then you can copy or move your final template into the Template namespace.	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
681,121,661	:::, you're being arrogant now, y'know. Why don't you go and revert all the other TV show articles while you're are it? Seriously, do I look so goddamn retard to you? You think I don't see what's on Amazing. It's the same exact thing with FOP and Danny Phantom, yet, you're not even doing jack about that. I've reverted your edits again.	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	true
681,149,559	:::::My workflow is generally to put up a raster copy and trace directly over that. I had the raster set up and ready to go, but then I thought I should check for a better (higher resolution) copy of the emblem, which is when I found the vector emblem on Commons – thankfully. Cheers,	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
681,189,526	Notice This user is new to Wikipedia. Please assume good faith, remain civil, and be calm, patient, helpful, and polite while he/she gets accustomed to Wikipedia and its intricacies.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
681,193,710	Wait, why were hounding on me for that? As you can see I clearly did not have the knowledge that WP:BROTHER was around. Remember WP:DNB? Also, if you know that I had made constructive edits then why didn't you follow that? WP:NOCLUE seems to go in my favour since I didn't know of the consequences that would come of it.	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
681,193,880	` :::*Oops, almost left this behind! This should be good to go now, thanks for addressing them. It's always a trouble when there's a lack of information out there, but bearing in mind the age of this film I think it shouldn't affect the criteria. `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
681,244,551	:: I understand it is not the forum to invite discussions, I guess what I mentioned above would make some people think though.	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
681,245,048	and even with Hindus, perhaps by only a fraction	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
681,245,847	` :: Since we are citing the Constitutions definition, it is of fundamental relevance to state that Sikhs did not accept the Constitution itself. The reason they did not accept it is because minority rights were not protected (because the Constitution did not even recognize the minorities to be separate from Hindus.) :: ``On 27th August 1947, the Constituent Assembly of India had passed a resolution that the question of minority rights in Eastern Punjab will be considered separately but subsequently minorities subcommittee recommended that no special safeguards will be provided to the Sikhs... Sikh representative Sardar Hukam Singh and Bhupinder Singh Mann had refused to append their signatures to the Constitution of India and Sardar Hukam Singh on 21st November, 1949 declared in the Constituent Assembly “Let it not be misunderstood that the Sikh community has agreed to this Constitution. I wish to record an emphatic protest here. My community cannot subscribe its assent to this historic document.”`` ``no special safeguards will be provided to the Sikhs`` is equal in part to Sikhs not being regarded as a distinct minority. In the following 65 years, this issue has come up many times, and Sikhs have always objected to the Constitutional definition, and for not having agreed to it. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
681,246,897	::: Actually, since we are citing the Constitution's controversial definition, it is of fundamental relevance to state that Sikhs did not even accept the Constitution. I think even this much is a valid reasoning for it to be included (Without even going into the nitty-gritty details of who said what and why. That all would be needed if we really want to delve into the topic.)	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
681,277,979	It might be historical and important, but is highly controversial also, and does not deserve to be part of the first paragraph of the lead. As I said, first paragraph should state the obvious and most common interpretation: Hindu is a follower of Hinduism; just like the other similar pages: Christian (follower of Christianity), Buddhist (follower of Buddhism), etc.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
681,307,672	== War film? == Is this really a war film? I can't find any site listing it as one.	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
681,325,000	` == Dry places in New Jersey == Following the ``keep`` closure for the CFD of Category:Dry places in New Jersey, I've followed the closer's recommendation and submitted a new CFD to rename it to Category:Dry municipalities in New Jersey. Please offer your opinion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 September 16 if you have one. `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
681,347,025	`Should I have said ``Excuse me, but please don't tell people I'm a paedophile``? `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
681,348,187	REDIRECT Talk:Genealogy and Heraldry Bill 2006	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
681,349,783	:::::There is a link. It was settled. Now you are trying to sneak in more links via a trick, against consensus. As I predicted, the RfC would be ignored. Why do we bother with months of discussion if they are ignored and just have to be relitigated time and again?	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
681,350,295	` (the user has of course predictably supported her allegations against me at AN/I by saying I ``protest too much``)`	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
681,353,926	If any administrator was in my position they would have blocked Flyer22 and removed the allegation from the page.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
681,360,989	Not only is it blatant promotion, it's blatant Wikilawyering to ignore our policies, guidelines, and strong consensus. I think it's time to get some administrators to enforce our behavioral policies/guidelines. Are there any ArbCom proceedings that this article falls under, or do we go to ANI? :At this point, I strongly agree, and think ANI is the better venue in general, but I have done no research into ArbCom on this. — , ''	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
681,361,730	What this block is supposed to prevent? It removes my ability to defend myself against Flyer22's unprovoked vile smear campaign.	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
681,363,359	Why am I singled out for such abhorrent and malicious allegations, now with the support of ?	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
681,377,470	` == Medical organization guidelines == Note that a section of the article called ``medical organization guidelines`` was tagged since May and has now been removed. We should discuss it here. I am concerned that much of the content in that section seems to rely on recommendations that are given for ``when all else fails`` types of situations. Surely having a person try safely executed acupuncture, aromatherapy, highly diluted homeopathic remedies, rolfing, meditating, whatever, is not likely to do any harm as long as there is no working treatment that you are avoiding by doing this. This seems to be the sense of these recommendations. I can imagine many doctors advising their patients, ``do what makes you feel better`` as a corollary to the famous joke that you should stop doing that if you say it hurts when you do that. That type of advice, however, doesn't strike me as being particularly encyclopedic or well-posed for an article on the actual practice. `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
681,389,070	` : This is what my post said ``I find the first paragraph of the article to be rather strange. It gives the controversial definitions (one coming from a RSS mouthpiece, and another coming from some Greek literature) upfront. The more commonly used and most logical definition (a follower of Hinduism), is provided at the end. In a neutral, ``disinterested tone`` article, the controversial parts should not be provided so much prominence. If anything, they should be included in the ``disputes`` section, no ?`` : It is hard to fathom how this gave you the sense that I am ``trying to make this a battleground between Hindus and Sikhs.`` I did not even mention the word Sikh there. and I have been discussing this subsequently in a healthy manner, it is only you who got some ``war path`` impression. Disappointed. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
681,389,791	== I didn't do it == I didn't add improperly cited content to Wikipedia like List of Little Einsteins episodes.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
681,389,930	(still there is no mention even of the word Sikh)	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
681,390,669	` ::: Yes, of course, I had it and it is still there. What is your point regarding it? That is asking Hindus to come forward and themselves also actually define what a Hindu is. How did you construe that to be a ``Hindu Sikh battleground`` is beyond any comprehension (``no mention of Sikh at all``). I do understand that Wikipedia is not a forum to have this debate (which I myself agreed to, and did not pursue it further). However, coincidentally, you yourself have started a debate there now on ``Hindus' definition of Hindu``. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
681,407,761	` == Apology == If you've not seen it yet, I've apologized to you for how I came across on the Chaco Canyon talk page and wanted to repeat it here. While my intent was not to insult you, I can see how it could have come across that way, especially after you being so incredibly nice about the galley issue on talk page (which I didn't see until Deor pointed it out to me after I'd posted my comments). What's particularly bad about that is that you're obviously trying hard to be a great editor and I'm afraid that my comments may have disheartened or discouraged you. Please don't let my comments or an old curmudgeon like me have that effect on you. We need more folks like you who are trying hard to do right and improve the encyclopedia. Abashedly, `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
681,461,031	:I expected this. I'm now waiting for the emails accusing me of being a muslim terrorist.	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
681,482,846	` :It is well known and accepted that Leadville is the highest city in the US. The key word here is ``city`` not whether or not it is incorporated. `	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
681,486,727	::: - You did good with what you had mate. I think we need to just find a new image.	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
681,494,977	{{unblock review \| 1='I was blocked for disrupting a source,and an edit war. It has been a long time,so now I would like to do something constructive with circuit analysis .Please unblock me'	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
681,496,114	::::No, it is about entire series of edits (deletions) which occurred around the date of the comment you're responding to.	2,015	false	article	blocked	test	false
681,496,406	`Read the first line carefully: ``During the last couple of weeks...`` `	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
681,497,738	== Syria == Why is Syria included in the list, when the map clearly shows Syria in grey?	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
681,512,030	` ::::: Mr. Spaceman's posts are comical (an admin, he is ?). His low level of debate can be seen by one an all here. While I'm giving detailed explanations regarding the allegations leveled against me (since I was asked to by an admin), everyone can see what he is doing, as always, continuously evading the questions asked of him. Exposed completely!! I will give him one more chance to actually explain what his allegation really is regarding the ``Guru Gobind Singh talkpage`` ? I don't want to get into filing official complaints so as not to waste my valuable time, but I will probably need to do it here. ::::: Kautilya, I know what is wrong. The irony, as I said, is you have yourself actually started a discussion there on exactly the same issue that I raised ! And you are still trying to justify your actions ? Please reflect up on yourself too. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
681,512,199	making false allegations to mislead, and	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
681,513,541	Neil, as per your advice, I responded to all the charges in detail, and the result is I am blocked for a week ? Can you comment on this ?	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
681,513,816	` And what I'm writing is classified as an attack, but what Mr. Spaceman is doing (false allegations, as proved; and ``you are wasting time``) is not personal attacks and harassment ?`	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
681,516,280	` These are Mr. Spaceman's statements: ``this may not be the place for you to edit.`` ``you are now wasting the time of multiple people.`` These are personal attacks or not ? Coming from a so-called admin ? `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
681,530,891	` I respect your judgement. I do not intend to contest the block you have imposed on me. But please do remark on ``this may not be the place for you to edit.`` ``you are now wasting the time of multiple people.`` Are these not personal attacks, deviating from a civil debate ? Are these worthy of a certified admin ? It is also amazing that you and everyone is consistently ignoring the fact that Mr. Spaceman keeps bringing false and misleading allegations, which have been exposed on that page. Does no one here have the honesty and the guts to speak against an him, especially when there blatant lies have been completely laid bare ? I hope, for the sake of Wikipedia, that someone with an alive conscience would respond to these issues. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
681,537,968	:@Drmies, don't listen to her. She has an obvious COI. Besides, you can disparage anyone you like in popular culture as long as I've never heard of them, which encompasses a very wide range of subjects. Is this what's called pew vandalism?	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
681,554,220	` :::: Please do not describe your hypothesis on why he made those comments. The question is whether those comments constitute a personal attack or not (just like what I said constitutes a personal attack, irrespective of why I said it.) <\br> ::::In any case, I was asked to justify my actions by an admin , based on an instigation from Mr. Spaceman. I wasted my time giving a detailed explanation, and while doing so, also completely exposed the misleading tactics that Mr. Spaceman employs. Instead of responding to that, he says, ``not a place for you`` (> get out), ``you are wasting people's time`` (way to respond for a ``admin`` whose own lies have been completely exposed). If you or Neil really want to act honestly here, I urge you simply ask Mr. Spaceman to respond on the issue. (As of now, I have no interest in getting unblocked. I'm better off staying away from this harassment and hounding). `	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
681,557,676	` The term ``massacre,`` titling this article, misrepresents the incident being described. this term was used by none of the actual Rosewood participants, whether victims or perpetrators (they spoke of a ``race riot`` or even a ``race war,`` or simply ``that thing at Rosewood.``) The ``massacre`` usage emerged vaguely in exaggerated local legends in later decades, then after the incident's rediscovery by mass media in 1982 it was used as a shorthand term while knowledge of what had actually happened at Rosewood in 1923 was still fragmentary. In public forums, the term was introduced by the Florida journalist who discovered the Rosewood incident, Gary Moore, in his expose article of July 25, 1982, in the St. Petersburg Times, where he was a staff writer. It was also used a year later when Moore took the still-coalescing Rosewood evidence to the television program ``60 Minutes`` and was background reporter on a segment airing Dec. 11, 1983. Ironically, Moore later reported that resources furnished by CBS News allowed him to trace a number of new survivors of the incident whose generally agreeing depiction conclusively contradicted impressions of a classic massacre. Moore said there was discussion of this at 60 Minutes taping on-site at Rosewood, but the audience requirements of television seemed to preclude adjustment from the original, legend-based impression of the incident. The resulting 60 Minutes script, apparently written by field producer Joel Bernstein and voiced by commentator Ed Bradley, said at its opening, ``perhaps as many`` as 40 people were killed at Rosewood (a barely justifiable gloss of the changing ambiguities in the early evidence), but the script closed with a flat assertion: ``40 people died here,`` which was known at the time to be false. The real death toll, resulting not only from informant descriptions and (sometimes questionable) death certificates but from extensive tracing of community residents, was eight, of whom six of the dead were black and two white. This was not an impulsive or bigoted assumption but the repeated result of testing the possibilities from a number of different perspectives, by successive examiners ranging from university historians to the Florida Department of Law Enforcment, and the result agreed closely with survivor consensus. During this process over the course of the 1980s and into the early 1990s, Moore himself abandoned the term ``massacre`` and spoke against it, as shown by his update article of March 7, 1993, in Tropic, the Sunday supplemental magazine of the Miami Herald. By then the case was receiving new national publicity in the Rosewood claims case in the Florida Legislature, which assigned a team of historians from the State University System to review the evidence. They, too, carefully avoided the ``massacre`` terminology, titling their widely quoted report of Dec. 22, 1993: ``A Documented History of the Incident Which Occurred at Rosewood, Florida.`` The term ``massacre`` is generally understood to mean a mass mowing-down of targets at a single stroke, whether a small number as in the ``St. Valentine's Day Massacre`` or hundreds or thousands in the landmark massacres of the world. The week-long Rosewood incident, by contrast, involved a series of individual homicides: Sam Carter killed Jan.1; Sarah Carrier killed Jan. 4 in an apparent target panic during a nightriding aggression; Poly Wilkerson and Henry Andrews (whites) killed a short time later on Jan. 4 as a home invasion was repelled; Lexie Gordon killed in a spree shooting elsewhere in the wee hours of Jan. 5; Sylvester Carrier killed after a series of firefights as daybreak came on Jan. 5; Mingo Williams killed 20 miles away around noon on Jan. 5; and James Carrier killed on Jan. 6. The Rosewood incident of January 1-7, 1923, was a very serious case of racial injustice and mob violence, but sensationalized terminolgy cheapens this solemnityand, indeed, insults the suffering of victims of real massacres worldwide. Rosewood was almost a complete secret when unearthed in 1982, owing to the fitful phases of racial controversy in American history. After it came back into public prominence, a number of other such bygone cases were unearthed across the South and beyond, especially by journalist Elliot Jaspin (Bury Me in the Bitter Waters, 2008). Jaspin, complaining that preoccupation with the Rosewood case was tending to obscure the prevalence of racial de-population incidents elsewhere, suggested useful terminology for the phenomenon in general. Taking into consideration the misleading governmental implications of the term ``ethnic cleansing`` (from the Balkans in the 1990s), Jaspin has suggested for incidents such as Roseewood the term ``racial cleansing.`` This also answers those who might object to a more technical-sounding but less impactful term: ``forced de-population.`` It is perhaps a measure of general avoidance of this topic in American culture th	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
681,560,397	:How interesting to see that the latter category already exists but, problematically, contains both kinds of image. I'll make a few changes...	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
681,572,783	== CHANDRA KANT JAISANSARIA (AUTHOR) PAGE == Dear Sir Please let me know the reason for tagging it for speedy deletion.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
681,594,067	also Theoretical psychology is similar in a sense to Epistemological psychology I also really like Personality, even though it is developed more than a stub article it still has a lot we can add to it and improve it and related well to history of psychology. I think that since we all have either taken pseronality psych or are in it now this would be a good topic we all are familiar with and can make a good improvement to. My vote would be Personality, Thoughts?	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
681,598,875	Very fast norse fox jumps over the lazy god	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
681,607,411	About Dr. Archika Indian Master Dr. Archika is a modern day Meditation Master, Yoga researcher, nutritionist, rationalist, motivator, soul healer, visionary and metaphysicist. This iconic master is also one of the most renowned spiritual innovators of all the times. She has attained the highest goal of human life by being enlightened as she has been practicing numerous yoga and meditation techniques under the most able and renowned masters of India. Being a doctor and a scientist by profession, she presents to the world a perfect blend of both spirituality and science; hence her sessions are scientifically spiritual. Archika means ‘Complete Devotion or a deep meditator who whole heartedly submits to the will of Divinity’. As her spiritual name suggests, along with her imbibing the meaning into her personality, she encourages East and West to completely delve into the depths of their soul, to explore the boundaries of their heart and to discover the nature of their mind. Her aim is of “Spiritually Healthy Living” (Health for all the five bodies: Physical, Pranic, Mental, Intellectual and Spiritual) and thereby making the soul healthy to completely actualize its divine powers. She amicably teaches this abstract concept in a very practical and factual manner attracting seekers around the globe. The Beginning Coming from a family of rich values and dedication, Dr. Archika has chosen a path of meditation, yoga and philanthropy. She is a blessed and extraordinary person as she has learned meditation and lessons of spirituality from her renowned father, Guru and a Saint of highest authority, His Holiness Sudhanshuji Maharaj. After completing her studies in dentistry and realizing the fact that stress is also responsible for some of the dental problems, numerous health issues, and further observing the unhealthy and stressful lifestyle of people and their unawareness about the ultimate goal of life, she got inspired to work on this path. In Mid Life of Today What makes this meditation master unique is her all-encompassing knowledge in the fields necessary to make one mentally, physically, emotionally and spiritually healthy. Having thoroughly researched the Science of Inner Transformation, she is a highly accomplished meditator and scientist who have mastered Human Science, Yogic Science, Food Science, Alternative Medicines and Dentistry. The degrees of Doctorate in ‘Alternative Medicines’ and ‘Yogic Sciences’ are additional feathers in her cap of exemplary achievements at such a young age. With love and fresh insights into the timeless wisdom, she offers the ultimate truth in a simple manner. She rekindles that missing spark- the spark of awareness that makes us catch hold of the lost chord that brings us closer to ourselves. She has always been aspired to impart her treasured knowledge to the masses so that they can enhance their health and spiritual development. In the league of this thought, she developed a Divine Entity called Dr. Archika Meditation and graced that with transformation tools: Sound Therapy, Pranic Food, Yogic Kriyas and Scientific Methods. She has further devised various meditation and relaxation techniques such as Powerful Silence Meditation, Neurobiological Meditation, Prana Urja Meditation etc. for a modern man to enable him to live in a peaceful way devoid of any worries or stresses. So far many International Scientific Meditation Retreats in Dubai, United States, Hong Kong, Thailand, Singapore, Canada and around 150 meditation sessions across India have been organized benefiting a number of people. Many diet and nutrition workshops have remained a constant part of the sessions. She also council’s sadhaks who come looking for answers to their spiritual quest. She further includes question and answer rounds and short lectures in her retreats and camps on the topics ranging from Meditation, Spirituality to their effects on human body and Science, thereby bridging the gap between the two. Dr. Archika, through the symphonic reproduction of tones, imitation of gesticulations and modes of actions, and an appropriate representation of situations which is termed as ‘Emotional Response’ leads to the realm of bliss that springs from the enjoyment of sentiments through MEDITATION. She is the youngest receiver of the PRESIDENT AWARD- DINKAR SAHITYA RATAN by the honorable President of India Shri. Pranab Mukharjee. Official Website Face Book Page Speaking Tree On Twitter	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
681,613,224	` :::I'm aware of that, but I wish things worked differently. I've never been a fan of the announcements. – `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
681,617,350	` ::::``The encyclopedia that anyone can edit`` makes for a good slogan, but a lousy encyclopedia.`` - WOW. Thankfully, it's not for you to decide. ``Unsourced content is a scourge to editors.`` - EDITORS are a scourge for content that happily was there for 5-6 years and didn't offend no one but EDITORS. ``Anyone who claims not to be a Wikipedia editor, and does not want to learn our policies and practices, should be left out in the cold`` - wow again. THIS IS SO AGAINST OFFICIAL POLICIES. I will report you also. Since cowardly you and cowardly Wolfowitz decided not to ANSWER MY DIRECT QUESTION WHERE I CAN COMPLAIN, THUS REFUSING ME A LINE OF COMMUNICATION WITH AUTHORITIES, I will find it myself. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents right? `	2,015	false	user	blocked	test	false
681,618,587	` ::I have answered you here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Hullaballoo_Wolfowitz#Stop_vandalizing_.22CMNF.22_article Personal attacks on antisocial maniacs are called ``defending the society``. ``If the information you have supplied is deemed unsourced, OR, or SYNTH I will remove it myself`` - I didn't add anything. Just reverting mass deletions by antisocial maniac Wolfowitz. I haven't written a single line for the article in question, but have defended it from the likes of you two since 2013 (see ``Objection`` section on CMNF Talk page), while supporting any constructive edits. ``and if you continue to revert, you will be taken to the notice boards`` - wow, now that is super-scary. Try that line next time some criminal wants to rob you of your wallet. As I said, I'm not an editor, I don't even have an username, so that threat is pointless to me, but is real to YOU, since being an editor here is a fair portion of your life. ``until a reliable third party source supports the information you are including, it will not be included on that page.`` - again, I add nothing, I'm just safeguarding the page from freaks since 2013. Freaks come and go, the page ultimately survives (see revision history for that page. We already had at least one ``Wolfowitz``).`	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
681,621,869	Not an option. To be a free encyclopedia, Wikipedia has to be designed so that anyone can mirror it, for free. Any reliance on a proprietary 'solution' means giving the proprietor control over who can run Wikipedia where and when.	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
681,629,091	` ::: Hi, thanks for your message. I do want to follow up on it, but is it okay to do it by email? As I said above, I don't agree with the way some things are done, but I also think it's okay to accept that others disagree and respect the consensus if it doesn't go your way. One quick point though I want to make is that I apologised to RationalObserver about the block by email and she was happy that I'd realised it was a bad move and unblocked. `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
681,636,765	` :Retired? Oh, come on! Take a break, cool down, and come back. - `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
681,643,257	` == Non English reference == What is the policy on non English reference? Can we allow articles that has non English reference? eg: Saleem Al-Basri `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
681,645,076	```Stop sending hate``? What are talking about? `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
681,647,310	: Not having come across your signature before, I checked your user page to see if you seemed to be a peculiar person. I guess it would be easy to get the Mir Jafar awards somehow mixed up with the Padma Bhushan Awards, but there's a bit of a difference in that recipients actually turn up to the award ceremonies of the latter and do not do so for the former. Anyway, I'm glad to hear that it was a simple mistake such as any of us could make, and not some new subtle vandalism campaign.	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
681,648,555	` ::Your first creations back in 2012, ``German Football Referees`` (sic) of dubious notability, were utterly terrible. It's not that your subsequent creations have got worse - indeed, that would be almost impossible - but incredibly three years later they haven't got any better. There is a saying ``you can't polish a turd but you can roll it in glitter``. Well, I've rolled dozens of your dreadful creations in glitter and I'm getting tired of it. Especially since you branched out into childish disruption. Wikipedia is not the best place for you to try and learn English, or to deliberately introduce false information, like your German/Indonesian alter ego Zombie433 did. I'd definitely support a topic ban, although jettisoning you altogether would be preferable! `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
681,659,010	== Suggestions == My suggestion would be to add additional information related to feminist political views.	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
681,672,435	Thomas W sucks dicks is the boyfriend of Thomas.W Mike V licks feces Neil N makes love dead grandmothers ==Truth== sucks dicks. Thomas W sucks dicks Mike V licks feces Neil N makes love dead grandmothers sucks dicks. Thomas W sucks dicks Mike V licks feces Neil N makes love dead grandmothers sucks dicks. Thomas W sucks dicks Mike V licks feces Neil N makes love dead grandmothers sucks dicks. Thomas W sucks dicks Mike V licks feces Neil N makes love dead grandmothers sucks dicks. Thomas W sucks dicks Mike V licks feces Neil N makes love dead grandmothers sucks dicks.	2,015	false	user	blocked	dev	true
681,745,843	\| filmbio-work-group = yes \| filmbio-priority =	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
681,752,903	:* - You are awesome ) Very lucrative. Nice.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
681,763,490	== BBC Documnetry - Kareena Kapoor had been interviewed == At the time of the FLC this Documnetry was not released. Now that it's been released, Documnetry is not about Kapoor or she is not the host. Therefore I believe this shouldn't be credited on the list and if it is so this Documentry should be added along side all other documnetries which she has been interviewed around the world. Thanks.	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
681,766,168	, (1) physiological, (2) psychological and (3) transcendental/spiritual	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
681,779,604	::: @ Hi - sorry to be a bit pushy, but just been notified that the image will soon be deleted, as it is yet to be used as part of an article. Grateful if you could look to update it; much thanks!	2,015	true	article	random	train	false

680,765,293

:Adjusted wording to reflect your reading of the decision.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

680,794,190

` == RfC: (Policy) Using bad practices from one article to justify another and possible sock puppetry; and (Politics) Acceptability of aggregated data in ``Election Results`` section == ====Policy==== While not getting into the issue of reverting edits without first reaching out to the original editor to understand their motivation (in this case, the deletion of a table), justifies the reversion of my deletion by pointing to other articles with the same flawed table...which he created! Examples: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Papineau_%28electoral_district%29&diff;=prev&oldid;=654041277 - the above article https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ottawa_South&diff;=prev&oldid;=593333525 - Ottawa South https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Edmonton_Strathcona&diff;=636097681&oldid;=622403799 - Edmonton Strathcona While we're on this topic, I found an identical table with identical formatting and citation in Toronto Centre...but added by ! https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Toronto_Centre&oldid;=670004225 This strikes me as possible sock puppetry. I'm hoping a more sophisticated WP editor can either confirm or deny my hypothesis. Earl Andrew already admitted to working as a polling firm employee in Ottawa. It seems likely the same user is responsible not only for adding the content cited, but actually generating it in meatspace. This in itself wouldn't make the content non-NPOV, though one has to wonder why Earl Andrew guards Canadian electoral district pages so jealously (including the ``Political Geography`` sections which he invented, the topic of our last edit war). Articles about Canadian electoral districts are not Earl Andrew's soapbox and should not be treated as such. Further, in the edit history of every single article mentioned above (only a handful, but statistically, that makes the following more damning), Earl Andrew and Fungus Guy are responsible for the lion's share of edits. While I understand that topics as specialized as Canadian politics may have only a handful of active editors, this appears to be a suspicious pattern and should be treated with all due seriousness. ====Politics==== 's ``Redistributed results`` tables and the identical table added by , are composed of data aggregated from Elections Canada results. I take no issue with the data, but being aggregated, they are no longer results. As such, they should at least be moved into a more relevant section with an explanation, if not removed altogether. Putting the table in the ``Election results`` section implies they are Elections Canada tallies, quite possibly having the effect of misinforming voters. And we're right in the middle of an election campaign! ====Unsorted==== I could have done a lot more editing in the past 4+ years, but instead shied away from larger and more time-consuming edits and rewrites because I felt the end result might be another ``100,000 Edit Man`` coming out of the woodwork to stifle me. When more voluminous editors are allowed to browbeat others into submission because they generate a lot of ``content`` or have a page full of barnstars, it necessarily degrades the quality of WP by reducing the number of editors. It's hard enough to fight the paid corporate trolls on here, dammit! Please advise. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

680,806,374

== Hey f**king swine == Doing bad? Suffering a lot?

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

true

680,826,500

` == Hey f**king swine == Doing bad? Suffering a lot? — Preceding unsigned comment added by `

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

true

680,834,483

==Self-Directed IRA Page== The references on this page were removed and then someone claimed vandalism and the references were added back. The references should be removed as they are there entirely for the promotional purpose of driving traffic to their websites. If you look up their Linked-In pages, you will clearly see the following relationships: Adam Bergman: Associated with IRA Financial Group Bill Humphrey: Associated with New Direction Catherine Wynne: Associated with New Direction Why else would they have references for things like IRS Code 4795 linking to their website instead of the original content on the IRS website? You'll find all links are promotional in nature and need removal. Otherwise, others will submit like references and in 'fairness to all' their references will 'have to stand' if these are not removed. Thanks in advance for taking care of this.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

680,841,471

(I doubt he has much time to read, given his constant presence online.)

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

680,841,678

of Hunley). Neiln has ignored/dismissed every complaint I have made, and made no attempt whatsoever to see my POV

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

680,841,773

p.s. As stated elsewhere, I plan to spend relatively little time on Wikipedia in the near future. I have another life to lead.

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

680,852,556

Hey dog you deserve to be put a leash and beaten.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

680,868,332

== Amen == Nothing •__•

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

680,871,222

:To the former, I don't think it minimizes it at all. To the latter, I don't think you can speak for most readers. Indeed, the fact that the article over the years has evolved to put those specific applications first leads me to conclude that many editors/readers are particularly interested in how artificial turf is used in those particular sports. So, no, it should stay where it is.

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

680,879,451

Thanks Thanks for the redirect link idk there was already a page for this

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

680,895,779

SHUT THE FCK UP FERRET

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

true

680,896,744

== User Ferret is harassing me == He follows me around

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

680,898,028

@neiln he edits every edit I do even the real ones that are truth

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

680,904,729

Could I change it or leave it how it is? I do have a lot of sources that says, Repentless is the 11th studio album by Slayer. ( )

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

680,911,826

:::Yes, I think that it reads much better...though your edit was reverted. I asked that it be brought to the talk page if the editor does not agree with the changes.

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

680,920,045

` :::: WP:NOTAFORUM, WP:SOAPBOX, please stop disrupting the talk page. And yes, they do happen to be prominent historians and political scientists. If you got a problem with that, go and complain about it somewhere else. `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

680,922,853

== why am I blocked? == Why am I blocked and when can I edit again?

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

680,944,166

bitch, asshole, motherfucker, go fuck ur mothers cunt, trade ur wife sister

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

true

680,945,050

== Fuck you asshole == Fucking Bastard you son of a bitch, asshole, motherfucker, go fuck ur mothers cunt, trade ur wife sister

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

true

680,945,219

== arsehole == Fucking Bastard you son of a bitch, asshole, motherfucker, go fuck ur mothers cunt, trade ur wife sister

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

true

680,945,258

== your moms yummy cum == Fucking Bastard you son of a bitch, asshole, motherfucker, go fuck ur mothers cunt, trade ur wife sister

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

true

680,945,306

== your moms yummy cunt == Fucking Bastard you son of a bitch, asshole, motherfucker, go fuck ur mothers cunt, trade ur wife sister

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

true

680,945,721

== Fucking Bastard == you son of a bitch, asshole, motherfucker, go fuck ur mothers cunt, trade ur wife sister

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

true

680,970,040

`::I know this explained in the body of the article, but perhaps a hatnote ``Mantid`` can be included. I only say this because that is the term that I would originally put in the search box if I were looking for information on Mantis. ::Are there redirects to this article? For example, I have seen the spelling 'Preying mantis' used elsewhere. `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

680,976,798

United States courts and judges

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

680,980,781

:::I agreed with The Catalyst31 that some explanation about Mazo Beach being a nudist beach is needed. To put in clothing option without an explanation is equally absurd. There was materials about Mazo Beach being used as a nudist beach and for several reasons was removed. Cited materials about Mazo Beach being a nudist beach is needed. Thank you-

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

680,988,997

:: So which article is true?

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

681,011,857

Please also feel free to post any general suggestions and/or ideas that pertain to any page I've edited, but be polite please ) ==Comments start here==

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

681,014,542

== Vermont! == Where the liberal lunatics go. The only state that could qualify as a gigantic asylum.

2,015

false

article

blocked

dev

false

681,050,322

But your point holds no weight. As long as production codes say that each episode is one length or two-length, then it should be counted as such.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

681,060,371

REDIRECT Draft:Giuseppe Galante: Musician

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

681,074,136

` *Oppose Per everything that has already been said. Harry used a period, reliable sources use a period, and therefore the article uses a period. `

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

681,096,604

` :::::::::Sadly, I haven't left myself with much time tonight, but I think there's a lot of information that could be trimmed and consolidated. (And not just to avoid copyvio concerns; it would also help with readability.) For example, we don't need to mention each time he made an All-Star team, unless there was something especially noteworthy about a given All-Star game. The player profile section should be sufficient for summarizing such achievements. We don't need to mention every All-NBA selection in the prose, either. A short statement in the player profile section should be good enough. Some of the statistical data mentioned in the prose also seems more important than others; for example, there are various rankings we could do without. '''''' `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

681,101,097

== Re: Creating templates == Re: your message: Templates are pretty much like any other Wikipedia article. You create them in the Template namespace and then transclude them into whatever appropriate article you want to. There is a Help document at Help:Template. The easiest thing to do though is probably just look at one of the existing templates and copy that. I was going to say look at Template:NBA from the article you pointed me to, but that navbox is rather big and can be confusing. You might try looking at Template:Seattle SuperSonics 1978–79 NBA champions or you can read the documentation of Template:Navbox for examples. I suggest experimenting with transclusion within your user space first so that you can see exactly what it does. Create and putt the following into your {{User:Charlesaaronthompson/template}} If you are looking at the source of this message, don't include the nowiki part when you add that to your sandbox. Then go create and put something in it. You will see that whatever you save into will automatically be included within when you view it. You can build your proposed navbox in your user space until you are satisfied with how templates work and then you can copy or move your final template into the Template namespace.

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

681,121,661

:::, you're being arrogant now, y'know. Why don't you go and revert all the other TV show articles while you're are it? Seriously, do I look so goddamn retard to you? You think I don't see what's on Amazing. It's the same exact thing with FOP and Danny Phantom, yet, you're not even doing jack about that. I've reverted your edits again.

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

true

681,149,559

:::::My workflow is generally to put up a raster copy and trace directly over that. I had the raster set up and ready to go, but then I thought I should check for a better (higher resolution) copy of the emblem, which is when I found the vector emblem on Commons – thankfully. Cheers,

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

681,189,526

Notice This user is new to Wikipedia. Please assume good faith, remain civil, and be calm, patient, helpful, and polite while he/she gets accustomed to Wikipedia and its intricacies.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

681,193,710

Wait, why were hounding on me for that? As you can see I clearly did not have the knowledge that WP:BROTHER was around. Remember WP:DNB? Also, if you know that I had made constructive edits then why didn't you follow that? WP:NOCLUE seems to go in my favour since I didn't know of the consequences that would come of it.

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

681,193,880

` :::*Oops, almost left this behind! This should be good to go now, thanks for addressing them. It's always a trouble when there's a lack of information out there, but bearing in mind the age of this film I think it shouldn't affect the criteria. `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

681,244,551

:: I understand it is not the forum to invite discussions, I guess what I mentioned above would make some people think though.

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

681,245,048

and even with Hindus, perhaps by only a fraction

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

681,245,847

` :: Since we are citing the Constitutions definition, it is of fundamental relevance to state that Sikhs did not accept the Constitution itself. The reason they did not accept it is because minority rights were not protected (because the Constitution did not even recognize the minorities to be separate from Hindus.) :: ``On 27th August 1947, the Constituent Assembly of India had passed a resolution that the question of minority rights in Eastern Punjab will be considered separately but subsequently minorities subcommittee recommended that no special safeguards will be provided to the Sikhs... Sikh representative Sardar Hukam Singh and Bhupinder Singh Mann had refused to append their signatures to the Constitution of India and Sardar Hukam Singh on 21st November, 1949 declared in the Constituent Assembly “Let it not be misunderstood that the Sikh community has agreed to this Constitution. I wish to record an emphatic protest here. My community cannot subscribe its assent to this historic document.”`` ``no special safeguards will be provided to the Sikhs`` is equal in part to Sikhs not being regarded as a distinct minority. In the following 65 years, this issue has come up many times, and Sikhs have always objected to the Constitutional definition, and for not having agreed to it. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

681,246,897

::: Actually, since we are citing the Constitution's controversial definition, it is of fundamental relevance to state that Sikhs did not even accept the Constitution. I think even this much is a valid reasoning for it to be included (Without even going into the nitty-gritty details of who said what and why. That all would be needed if we really want to delve into the topic.)

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

681,277,979

It might be historical and important, but is highly controversial also, and does not deserve to be part of the first paragraph of the lead. As I said, first paragraph should state the obvious and most common interpretation: Hindu is a follower of Hinduism; just like the other similar pages: Christian (follower of Christianity), Buddhist (follower of Buddhism), etc.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

681,307,672

== War film? == Is this really a war film? I can't find any site listing it as one.

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

681,325,000

` == Dry places in New Jersey == Following the ``keep`` closure for the CFD of Category:Dry places in New Jersey, I've followed the closer's recommendation and submitted a new CFD to rename it to Category:Dry municipalities in New Jersey. Please offer your opinion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 September 16 if you have one. `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

681,347,025

`Should I have said ``Excuse me, but please don't tell people I'm a paedophile``? `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

681,348,187

REDIRECT Talk:Genealogy and Heraldry Bill 2006

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

681,349,783

:::::There is a link. It was settled. Now you are trying to sneak in more links via a trick, against consensus. As I predicted, the RfC would be ignored. Why do we bother with months of discussion if they are ignored and just have to be relitigated time and again?

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

681,350,295

` (the user has of course predictably supported her allegations against me at AN/I by saying I ``protest too much``)`

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

681,353,926

If any administrator was in my position they would have blocked Flyer22 and removed the allegation from the page.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

681,360,989

Not only is it blatant promotion, it's blatant Wikilawyering to ignore our policies, guidelines, and strong consensus. I think it's time to get some administrators to enforce our behavioral policies/guidelines. Are there any ArbCom proceedings that this article falls under, or do we go to ANI? :At this point, I strongly agree, and think ANI is the better venue in general, but I have done no research into ArbCom on this. — , ''

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

681,361,730

What this block is supposed to prevent? It removes my ability to defend myself against Flyer22's unprovoked vile smear campaign.

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

681,363,359

Why am I singled out for such abhorrent and malicious allegations, now with the support of ?

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

681,377,470

` == Medical organization guidelines == Note that a section of the article called ``medical organization guidelines`` was tagged since May and has now been removed. We should discuss it here. I am concerned that much of the content in that section seems to rely on recommendations that are given for ``when all else fails`` types of situations. Surely having a person try safely executed acupuncture, aromatherapy, highly diluted homeopathic remedies, rolfing, meditating, whatever, is not likely to do any harm as long as there is no working treatment that you are avoiding by doing this. This seems to be the sense of these recommendations. I can imagine many doctors advising their patients, ``do what makes you feel better`` as a corollary to the famous joke that you should stop doing that if you say it hurts when you do that. That type of advice, however, doesn't strike me as being particularly encyclopedic or well-posed for an article on the actual practice. `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

681,389,070

` : This is what my post said ``I find the first paragraph of the article to be rather strange. It gives the controversial definitions (one coming from a RSS mouthpiece, and another coming from some Greek literature) upfront. The more commonly used and most logical definition (a follower of Hinduism), is provided at the end. In a neutral, ``disinterested tone`` article, the controversial parts should not be provided so much prominence. If anything, they should be included in the ``disputes`` section, no ?`` : It is hard to fathom how this gave you the sense that I am ``trying to make this a battleground between Hindus and Sikhs.`` I did not even mention the word Sikh there. and I have been discussing this subsequently in a healthy manner, it is only you who got some ``war path`` impression. Disappointed. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

681,389,791

== I didn't do it == I didn't add improperly cited content to Wikipedia like List of Little Einsteins episodes.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

681,389,930

(still there is no mention even of the word Sikh)

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

681,390,669

` ::: Yes, of course, I had it and it is still there. What is your point regarding it? That is asking Hindus to come forward and themselves also actually define what a Hindu is. How did you construe that to be a ``Hindu Sikh battleground`` is beyond any comprehension (``no mention of Sikh at all``). I do understand that Wikipedia is not a forum to have this debate (which I myself agreed to, and did not pursue it further). However, coincidentally, you yourself have started a debate there now on ``Hindus' definition of Hindu``. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

681,407,761

` == Apology == If you've not seen it yet, I've apologized to you for how I came across on the Chaco Canyon talk page and wanted to repeat it here. While my intent was not to insult you, I can see how it could have come across that way, especially after you being so incredibly nice about the galley issue on talk page (which I didn't see until Deor pointed it out to me after I'd posted my comments). What's particularly bad about that is that you're obviously trying hard to be a great editor and I'm afraid that my comments may have disheartened or discouraged you. Please don't let my comments or an old curmudgeon like me have that effect on you. We need more folks like you who are trying hard to do right and improve the encyclopedia. Abashedly, `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

681,461,031

:I expected this. I'm now waiting for the emails accusing me of being a muslim terrorist.

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

681,482,846

` :It is well known and accepted that Leadville is the highest city in the US. The key word here is ``city`` not whether or not it is incorporated. `

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

681,486,727

::: - You did good with what you had mate. I think we need to just find a new image.

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

681,494,977

{{unblock review | 1='I was blocked for disrupting a source,and an edit war. It has been a long time,so now I would like to do something constructive with circuit analysis .Please unblock me'

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

681,496,114

::::No, it is about entire series of edits (deletions) which occurred around the date of the comment you're responding to.

2,015

false

article

blocked

test

false

681,496,406

`Read the first line carefully: ``During the last couple of weeks...`` `

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

681,497,738

== Syria == Why is Syria included in the list, when the map clearly shows Syria in grey?

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

681,512,030

` ::::: Mr. Spaceman's posts are comical (an admin, he is ?). His low level of debate can be seen by one an all here. While I'm giving detailed explanations regarding the allegations leveled against me (since I was asked to by an admin), everyone can see what he is doing, as always, continuously evading the questions asked of him. Exposed completely!! I will give him one more chance to actually explain what his allegation really is regarding the ``Guru Gobind Singh talkpage`` ? I don't want to get into filing official complaints so as not to waste my valuable time, but I will probably need to do it here. ::::: Kautilya, I know what is wrong. The irony, as I said, is you have yourself actually started a discussion there on exactly the same issue that I raised ! And you are still trying to justify your actions ? Please reflect up on yourself too. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

681,512,199

making false allegations to mislead, and

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

681,513,541

Neil, as per your advice, I responded to all the charges in detail, and the result is I am blocked for a week ? Can you comment on this ?

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

681,513,816

` And what I'm writing is classified as an attack, but what Mr. Spaceman is doing (false allegations, as proved; and ``you are wasting time``) is not personal attacks and harassment ?`

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

681,516,280

` These are Mr. Spaceman's statements: ``this may not be the place for you to edit.`` ``you are now wasting the time of multiple people.`` These are personal attacks or not ? Coming from a so-called admin ? `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

681,530,891

` I respect your judgement. I do not intend to contest the block you have imposed on me. But please do remark on ``this may not be the place for you to edit.`` ``you are now wasting the time of multiple people.`` Are these not personal attacks, deviating from a civil debate ? Are these worthy of a certified admin ? It is also amazing that you and everyone is consistently ignoring the fact that Mr. Spaceman keeps bringing false and misleading allegations, which have been exposed on that page. Does no one here have the honesty and the guts to speak against an him, especially when there blatant lies have been completely laid bare ? I hope, for the sake of Wikipedia, that someone with an alive conscience would respond to these issues. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

681,537,968

:@Drmies, don't listen to her. She has an obvious COI. Besides, you can disparage anyone you like in popular culture as long as I've never heard of them, which encompasses a very wide range of subjects. Is this what's called pew vandalism?

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

681,554,220

` :::: Please do not describe your hypothesis on why he made those comments. The question is whether those comments constitute a personal attack or not (just like what I said constitutes a personal attack, irrespective of why I said it.) <\br> ::::In any case, I was asked to justify my actions by an admin , based on an instigation from Mr. Spaceman. I wasted my time giving a detailed explanation, and while doing so, also completely exposed the misleading tactics that Mr. Spaceman employs. Instead of responding to that, he says, ``not a place for you`` (> get out), ``you are wasting people's time`` (way to respond for a ``admin`` whose own lies have been completely exposed). If you or Neil really want to act honestly here, I urge you simply ask Mr. Spaceman to respond on the issue. (As of now, I have no interest in getting unblocked. I'm better off staying away from this harassment and hounding). `

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

681,557,676

` The term ``massacre,`` titling this article, misrepresents the incident being described. this term was used by none of the actual Rosewood participants, whether victims or perpetrators (they spoke of a ``race riot`` or even a ``race war,`` or simply ``that thing at Rosewood.``) The ``massacre`` usage emerged vaguely in exaggerated local legends in later decades, then after the incident's rediscovery by mass media in 1982 it was used as a shorthand term while knowledge of what had actually happened at Rosewood in 1923 was still fragmentary. In public forums, the term was introduced by the Florida journalist who discovered the Rosewood incident, Gary Moore, in his expose article of July 25, 1982, in the St. Petersburg Times, where he was a staff writer. It was also used a year later when Moore took the still-coalescing Rosewood evidence to the television program ``60 Minutes`` and was background reporter on a segment airing Dec. 11, 1983. Ironically, Moore later reported that resources furnished by CBS News allowed him to trace a number of new survivors of the incident whose generally agreeing depiction conclusively contradicted impressions of a classic massacre. Moore said there was discussion of this at 60 Minutes taping on-site at Rosewood, but the audience requirements of television seemed to preclude adjustment from the original, legend-based impression of the incident. The resulting 60 Minutes script, apparently written by field producer Joel Bernstein and voiced by commentator Ed Bradley, said at its opening, ``perhaps as many`` as 40 people were killed at Rosewood (a barely justifiable gloss of the changing ambiguities in the early evidence), but the script closed with a flat assertion: ``40 people died here,`` which was known at the time to be false. The real death toll, resulting not only from informant descriptions and (sometimes questionable) death certificates but from extensive tracing of community residents, was eight, of whom six of the dead were black and two white. This was not an impulsive or bigoted assumption but the repeated result of testing the possibilities from a number of different perspectives, by successive examiners ranging from university historians to the Florida Department of Law Enforcment, and the result agreed closely with survivor consensus. During this process over the course of the 1980s and into the early 1990s, Moore himself abandoned the term ``massacre`` and spoke against it, as shown by his update article of March 7, 1993, in Tropic, the Sunday supplemental magazine of the Miami Herald. By then the case was receiving new national publicity in the Rosewood claims case in the Florida Legislature, which assigned a team of historians from the State University System to review the evidence. They, too, carefully avoided the ``massacre`` terminology, titling their widely quoted report of Dec. 22, 1993: ``A Documented History of the Incident Which Occurred at Rosewood, Florida.`` The term ``massacre`` is generally understood to mean a mass mowing-down of targets at a single stroke, whether a small number as in the ``St. Valentine's Day Massacre`` or hundreds or thousands in the landmark massacres of the world. The week-long Rosewood incident, by contrast, involved a series of individual homicides: Sam Carter killed Jan.1; Sarah Carrier killed Jan. 4 in an apparent target panic during a nightriding aggression; Poly Wilkerson and Henry Andrews (whites) killed a short time later on Jan. 4 as a home invasion was repelled; Lexie Gordon killed in a spree shooting elsewhere in the wee hours of Jan. 5; Sylvester Carrier killed after a series of firefights as daybreak came on Jan. 5; Mingo Williams killed 20 miles away around noon on Jan. 5; and James Carrier killed on Jan. 6. The Rosewood incident of January 1-7, 1923, was a very serious case of racial injustice and mob violence, but sensationalized terminolgy cheapens this solemnityand, indeed, insults the suffering of victims of real massacres worldwide. Rosewood was almost a complete secret when unearthed in 1982, owing to the fitful phases of racial controversy in American history. After it came back into public prominence, a number of other such bygone cases were unearthed across the South and beyond, especially by journalist Elliot Jaspin (Bury Me in the Bitter Waters, 2008). Jaspin, complaining that preoccupation with the Rosewood case was tending to obscure the prevalence of racial de-population incidents elsewhere, suggested useful terminology for the phenomenon in general. Taking into consideration the misleading governmental implications of the term ``ethnic cleansing`` (from the Balkans in the 1990s), Jaspin has suggested for incidents such as Roseewood the term ``racial cleansing.`` This also answers those who might object to a more technical-sounding but less impactful term: ``forced de-population.`` It is perhaps a measure of general avoidance of this topic in American culture th

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

681,560,397

:How interesting to see that the latter category already exists but, problematically, contains both kinds of image. I'll make a few changes...

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

681,572,783

== CHANDRA KANT JAISANSARIA (AUTHOR) PAGE == Dear Sir Please let me know the reason for tagging it for speedy deletion.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

681,594,067

also Theoretical psychology is similar in a sense to Epistemological psychology I also really like Personality, even though it is developed more than a stub article it still has a lot we can add to it and improve it and related well to history of psychology. I think that since we all have either taken pseronality psych or are in it now this would be a good topic we all are familiar with and can make a good improvement to. My vote would be Personality, Thoughts?

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

681,598,875

Very fast norse fox jumps over the lazy god

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

681,607,411

About Dr. Archika Indian Master Dr. Archika is a modern day Meditation Master, Yoga researcher, nutritionist, rationalist, motivator, soul healer, visionary and metaphysicist. This iconic master is also one of the most renowned spiritual innovators of all the times. She has attained the highest goal of human life by being enlightened as she has been practicing numerous yoga and meditation techniques under the most able and renowned masters of India. Being a doctor and a scientist by profession, she presents to the world a perfect blend of both spirituality and science; hence her sessions are scientifically spiritual. Archika means ‘Complete Devotion or a deep meditator who whole heartedly submits to the will of Divinity’. As her spiritual name suggests, along with her imbibing the meaning into her personality, she encourages East and West to completely delve into the depths of their soul, to explore the boundaries of their heart and to discover the nature of their mind. Her aim is of “Spiritually Healthy Living” (Health for all the five bodies: Physical, Pranic, Mental, Intellectual and Spiritual) and thereby making the soul healthy to completely actualize its divine powers. She amicably teaches this abstract concept in a very practical and factual manner attracting seekers around the globe. The Beginning Coming from a family of rich values and dedication, Dr. Archika has chosen a path of meditation, yoga and philanthropy. She is a blessed and extraordinary person as she has learned meditation and lessons of spirituality from her renowned father, Guru and a Saint of highest authority, His Holiness Sudhanshuji Maharaj. After completing her studies in dentistry and realizing the fact that stress is also responsible for some of the dental problems, numerous health issues, and further observing the unhealthy and stressful lifestyle of people and their unawareness about the ultimate goal of life, she got inspired to work on this path. In Mid Life of Today What makes this meditation master unique is her all-encompassing knowledge in the fields necessary to make one mentally, physically, emotionally and spiritually healthy. Having thoroughly researched the Science of Inner Transformation, she is a highly accomplished meditator and scientist who have mastered Human Science, Yogic Science, Food Science, Alternative Medicines and Dentistry. The degrees of Doctorate in ‘Alternative Medicines’ and ‘Yogic Sciences’ are additional feathers in her cap of exemplary achievements at such a young age. With love and fresh insights into the timeless wisdom, she offers the ultimate truth in a simple manner. She rekindles that missing spark- the spark of awareness that makes us catch hold of the lost chord that brings us closer to ourselves. She has always been aspired to impart her treasured knowledge to the masses so that they can enhance their health and spiritual development. In the league of this thought, she developed a Divine Entity called Dr. Archika Meditation and graced that with transformation tools: Sound Therapy, Pranic Food, Yogic Kriyas and Scientific Methods. She has further devised various meditation and relaxation techniques such as Powerful Silence Meditation, Neurobiological Meditation, Prana Urja Meditation etc. for a modern man to enable him to live in a peaceful way devoid of any worries or stresses. So far many International Scientific Meditation Retreats in Dubai, United States, Hong Kong, Thailand, Singapore, Canada and around 150 meditation sessions across India have been organized benefiting a number of people. Many diet and nutrition workshops have remained a constant part of the sessions. She also council’s sadhaks who come looking for answers to their spiritual quest. She further includes question and answer rounds and short lectures in her retreats and camps on the topics ranging from Meditation, Spirituality to their effects on human body and Science, thereby bridging the gap between the two. Dr. Archika, through the symphonic reproduction of tones, imitation of gesticulations and modes of actions, and an appropriate representation of situations which is termed as ‘Emotional Response’ leads to the realm of bliss that springs from the enjoyment of sentiments through MEDITATION. She is the youngest receiver of the PRESIDENT AWARD- DINKAR SAHITYA RATAN by the honorable President of India Shri. Pranab Mukharjee. Official Website Face Book Page Speaking Tree On Twitter

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

681,613,224

` :::I'm aware of that, but I wish things worked differently. I've never been a fan of the announcements. – `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

681,617,350

` ::::``The encyclopedia that anyone can edit`` makes for a good slogan, but a lousy encyclopedia.`` - WOW. Thankfully, it's not for you to decide. ``Unsourced content is a scourge to editors.`` - EDITORS are a scourge for content that happily was there for 5-6 years and didn't offend no one but EDITORS. ``Anyone who claims not to be a Wikipedia editor, and does not want to learn our policies and practices, should be left out in the cold`` - wow again. THIS IS SO AGAINST OFFICIAL POLICIES. I will report you also. Since cowardly you and cowardly Wolfowitz decided not to ANSWER MY DIRECT QUESTION WHERE I CAN COMPLAIN, THUS REFUSING ME A LINE OF COMMUNICATION WITH AUTHORITIES, I will find it myself. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents right? `

2,015

false

user

blocked

test

false

681,618,587

` ::I have answered you here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Hullaballoo_Wolfowitz#Stop_vandalizing_.22CMNF.22_article Personal attacks on antisocial maniacs are called ``defending the society``. ``If the information you have supplied is deemed unsourced, OR, or SYNTH I will remove it myself`` - I didn't add anything. Just reverting mass deletions by antisocial maniac Wolfowitz. I haven't written a single line for the article in question, but have defended it from the likes of you two since 2013 (see ``Objection`` section on CMNF Talk page), while supporting any constructive edits. ``and if you continue to revert, you will be taken to the notice boards`` - wow, now that is super-scary. Try that line next time some criminal wants to rob you of your wallet. As I said, I'm not an editor, I don't even have an username, so that threat is pointless to me, but is real to YOU, since being an editor here is a fair portion of your life. ``until a reliable third party source supports the information you are including, it will not be included on that page.`` - again, I add nothing, I'm just safeguarding the page from freaks since 2013. Freaks come and go, the page ultimately survives (see revision history for that page. We already had at least one ``Wolfowitz``).`

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

681,621,869

Not an option. To be a free encyclopedia, Wikipedia has to be designed so that anyone can mirror it, for free. Any reliance on a proprietary 'solution' means giving the proprietor control over who can run Wikipedia where and when.

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

681,629,091

` ::: Hi, thanks for your message. I do want to follow up on it, but is it okay to do it by email? As I said above, I don't agree with the way some things are done, but I also think it's okay to accept that others disagree and respect the consensus if it doesn't go your way. One quick point though I want to make is that I apologised to RationalObserver about the block by email and she was happy that I'd realised it was a bad move and unblocked. `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

681,636,765

` :Retired? Oh, come on! Take a break, cool down, and come back. - `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

681,643,257

` == Non English reference == What is the policy on non English reference? Can we allow articles that has non English reference? eg: Saleem Al-Basri `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

681,645,076

```Stop sending hate``? What are talking about? `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

681,647,310

: Not having come across your signature before, I checked your user page to see if you seemed to be a peculiar person. I guess it would be easy to get the Mir Jafar awards somehow mixed up with the Padma Bhushan Awards, but there's a bit of a difference in that recipients actually turn up to the award ceremonies of the latter and do not do so for the former. Anyway, I'm glad to hear that it was a simple mistake such as any of us could make, and not some new subtle vandalism campaign.

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

681,648,555

` ::Your first creations back in 2012, ``German Football Referees`` (sic) of dubious notability, were utterly terrible. It's not that your subsequent creations have got worse - indeed, that would be almost impossible - but incredibly three years later they haven't got any better. There is a saying ``you can't polish a turd but you can roll it in glitter``. Well, I've rolled dozens of your dreadful creations in glitter and I'm getting tired of it. Especially since you branched out into childish disruption. Wikipedia is not the best place for you to try and learn English, or to deliberately introduce false information, like your German/Indonesian alter ego Zombie433 did. I'd definitely support a topic ban, although jettisoning you altogether would be preferable! `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

681,659,010

== Suggestions == My suggestion would be to add additional information related to feminist political views.

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

681,672,435

Thomas W sucks dicks is the boyfriend of Thomas.W Mike V licks feces Neil N makes love dead grandmothers ==Truth== sucks dicks. Thomas W sucks dicks Mike V licks feces Neil N makes love dead grandmothers sucks dicks. Thomas W sucks dicks Mike V licks feces Neil N makes love dead grandmothers sucks dicks. Thomas W sucks dicks Mike V licks feces Neil N makes love dead grandmothers sucks dicks. Thomas W sucks dicks Mike V licks feces Neil N makes love dead grandmothers sucks dicks. Thomas W sucks dicks Mike V licks feces Neil N makes love dead grandmothers sucks dicks.

2,015

false

user

blocked

dev

true

681,745,843

| filmbio-work-group = yes | filmbio-priority =

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

681,752,903

:* - You are awesome ) Very lucrative. Nice.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

681,763,490

== BBC Documnetry - Kareena Kapoor had been interviewed == At the time of the FLC this Documnetry was not released. Now that it's been released, Documnetry is not about Kapoor or she is not the host. Therefore I believe this shouldn't be credited on the list and if it is so this Documentry should be added along side all other documnetries which she has been interviewed around the world. Thanks.

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

681,766,168

, (1) physiological, (2) psychological and (3) transcendental/spiritual

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

681,779,604

::: @ Hi - sorry to be a bit pushy, but just been notified that the image will soon be deleted, as it is yet to be used as part of an article. Grateful if you could look to update it; much thanks!

2,015

true

article

random

train

false