rev_id
int64 37.7k
700M
| comment
stringlengths 5
10k
| year
int64 2k
2.02k
| logged_in
bool 2
classes | ns
stringclasses 2
values | sample
stringclasses 2
values | split
stringclasses 3
values | attack
bool 2
classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
683,851,173
|
== The article's chronic vandal and edit warrior is back == The Italian edit warrior with ever changing IP address is back at it again, vandalizing this article. We have to get either permanent protection on the article or find a way to ban this editor (will be difficult due to him using different IP addresses all the time).
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
683,851,716
|
:@: By the way, I'm asking why you blocked me so I can reflect on what I did and decide whether or not to appeal. There are a number of possible reasons you might think the above quote was unacceptable, including (1) you think I was threatening to abuse GAR to pursue a personal vendetta rather than to improve the encyclopedia; (2) you think CurtisNaito's article edits are awesome and for me to criticize them constitutes a personal attack; (3) you think what I said constituted a threat and regardless of its merit it created a hostile editing environment; (4) you think it violated some policy I am not aware of regarding off-wiki drafts or some such... (I'm going to stop there.) :If (1): As I have already clarified, the GA criteria indicate that those articles should be either improved to bring them up to legitimate GA status, or reassessed. CurtisNaito's track record of OWNership and edit-warring indicates that the former is impossible, leaving the latter option. Reassessing those articles would be in accordance with content policy, and I wasn't actually threatening to do so anyway; I was threatening not to do so. In my two years of arguing with CurtisNaito, I have in all but one occasion (the Emperor Jimmu article) chosen the carrot over the stick. :If (2): You should express that opinion in an appropriate forum like an article talk page or the currently open History of Japan GAR. Blocking one side of a content dispute because you happen to agree with the other is inappropriate, especially when the other side has explicitly violated an ANI final warning numerous times over the past two weeks. (Note that I don't actually think this is why you blocked me. I'm grabbing at straws.) :If (3): You may be right, but look what I have had to deal with: CurtisNaito has requested four times in the last five months, on both ANI and ArbCom, that I be site-banned for disagreeing with his edits, even though pretty much everyone else disagrees with them too. If there's a hostile editing environment, I'm not the one to blame. And as in (1) above, it was not a threat anyway I was offering a favour in exchange for CurtisNaito granting me the favour of not requesting that I be site-banned anymore. If this is what you meant, it's a good faith misunderstanding, and I will try to avoid such misunderstandings in the future, but I should still be unblocked. :If (4): Tell me the policy. I won't violate it again. I also won't appeal the block, though, since I've been here too long for ignorance of the rules to be a valid excuse. : ()
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
683,854,598
|
(3) you think what I said constituted a threat and regardless of its merit it created a hostile editing environment; (4) you think it violated some policy I am not aware of regarding off-wiki drafts or some such... (I'm going to stop there.) :If (1): As I have already clarified, the GA criteria indicate that those articles should be either improved to bring them up to legitimate GA status, or reassessed. CurtisNaito's track record of OWNership and edit-warring indicates that the former is impossible, leaving the latter option. Reassessing those articles would be in accordance with content policy, and I wasn't actually threatening to do so anyway; I was threatening not to do so. In my two years of arguing with CurtisNaito, I have in all but one occasion (the Emperor Jimmu article) chosen the carrot over the stick. :If (2): You should express that opinion in an appropriate forum like an article talk page or the currently open History of Japan GAR. Blocking one side of a content dispute because you happen to agree with the other is inappropriate, especially when the other side has explicitly violated an ANI final warning numerous times over the past two weeks. (Note that I don't actually think this is why you blocked me. I'm grabbing at straws.)Sorry. Just noticed this. () :If (3): You may be right, but look what I have had to deal with: CurtisNaito has requested four times in the last five months, on both ANI and ArbCom, that I be site-banned for disagreeing with his edits, even though pretty much everyone else disagrees with them too. If there's a hostile editing environment, I'm not the one to blame. And as in (1) above, it was not a threat anyway I was offering a favour in exchange for CurtisNaito granting me the favour of not requesting that I be site-banned anymore. If this is what you meant, it's a good faith misunderstanding, and I will try to avoid such misunderstandings in the future, but I should still be unblocked. :If (4): Tell me the policy. I won't violate it again. I also won't appeal the block, though, since I've been here too long for ignorance of the rules to be a valid excuse. : ()
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
683,884,281
|
== Advice? == @ @ I sent you mail. ()
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
683,904,980
|
` ::Replied with further comments. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
683,918,218
|
` :::::::I'm not really interested in your unnamed ``plenty of sources`` to back up your points and assumptions or mine. I'm also not interested in your personal opinions on Aztecs, intermarriages, minorities, etc. We're not here to take sides and carry on the academic debate; leave that to the academics. If you think something in our article is disputed, you need to produce the reliable source(s) (include the publication, page numbers, etc.) which you say refutes the existing sources, so we can review it and determine if the information in our article needs to be changed. As for your request that we follow WP:AD, sure, we can do that if you'd prefer. As instructed at WP:AD, I've marked the section in our article as disputed (so that it gets listed in the Disputed Category) and opened a ``Dispute`` section on this Talk page (see below). ==Disputed== A concern has been raised that the article contains entries which ``cannot be classified as a war`` because they consist of multiple wars and conflicts, and often span long periods of time. (For example, see the entries on: Mongolian conquests — Conquest of the Americas — Conquests of Tamerlane — Qing dynasty conquest of Ming Dynasty - Shaka's Conquests — Conquests of Mehmed II — etc.) Are entries like these within the scope of this list article?`
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
683,929,949
|
`Please remove the recently added sepia-toned photo labled ``Bat Masterson,`` located at the right of the ``Gunfighters and lawman`` section. I have written two books on Masterson, and have also had a long career as a portrait artist. I can assure you that the man in this photo is not Bat. Please remove it as soon as possible. Thank you. `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
683,965,519
|
` :Hi! Yes, I'll be sure to do that. Sorry about calling you ``man`` yesterday, by the way. I wasn't seeing your replies. Thanks. `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
683,965,546
|
== Apology == Hi, I am still waiting for you to apologize for your uncivility towards me. I am not anti-Russian and I strongly object to your attempt to throw mud at me.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
683,965,670
|
Your incivility at In The News Candidates
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
683,968,575
|
ETA: Can I sing the Pie Jesu?
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
683,982,953
|
:: Your fellow editor has spent her time finding six sources and at least five of them are excellent sources. If you have an actual policy-certified objection, WP:DR is the way to go, not edit warring. Frankly, your objections so far have been very weak. The two ZDNet sources are more than enough in my book.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
684,009,069
|
== Hey == Idk who Mrmike is and okay I'll stop editing hip hop pages, who are you by the way sr.? if you don't mine me asking
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
684,029,323
|
== Extremely unpleasant things == Are what you are deserving of!
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
684,043,301
|
]], done * [[Template talk:Infobox music festival#Nominated for deletion|Template:Ibox music festival
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
684,058,994
|
` == Christ == If only wikipedia, and so called ``progressives`` (degenerates) like yourself acted so swiftly to protect other religions from criticism in the same way you seem to stonewall anything less than ultra positive...it's quite sad.`
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
684,059,054
|
` about the peaceful, loving, ``gonna destroy the UK as a whole because of icecream`` religion of peace that is Islam`
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
684,080,968
|
:See MOS:PLURALS and ANI.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
684,087,720
|
`, 4 October 2015 (UTC) ::::Even if it stated ``constituent countries``, I think the link to the country article would be preferred (i.e. ``constituent countries``) . The article—constituent country—is simply a list of countries within states. It doesn't actually explain what a country is. The country article does: ``A country is a region that is identified as a distinct entity in political geography. A country may be an independent sovereign state or one that is occupied by another state, as a non-sovereign or formerly sovereign political division...``. 14:13`
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
684,095,817
|
== Your incivility at In The News Candidates == Hi, I am still waiting for you to apologize for your uncivility towards me. I am not anti-Russian and I strongly object to your attempt to throw mud at me.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
684,099,995
|
This may seem a small difference but Kobe is not on a western coastline, it is on the coast of Osaka Bay, on the Pacific Coast of Japan.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
684,118,744
|
: We don't have full declensions attested for any noun in Gaulish, so unfortunately we must rely on reconstructed models.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
684,149,123
|
== Regarding your uncivility == I notice that you keep deleting my kind reminder to retract your personal attack or to apologize. This seems to be hard for you, which seems to indicate that your incivility was on purpose. I hope that's not the case, and that you will show maturity and retract the comment you made. Shouldn't be that difficult. In any case, I found this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_personal_attacks It's a policy, and you are required to follow it. Thanks, and kind regards from a russophile.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
684,153,621
|
****First, it disturbs me that I can't answer the good issues you're raising, about number of copies sold, etc. without the sources at hand. I *think* that info might be in the Reynolds compilation of essays that I'd have to order again via interlibrary loan and that takes weeks. Beyond that, to your questions: I'll retire, or take a long break, or do whatever one does when fed up with this place. No, I wouldn't renominate - I'd let it go. I wrote it for WP to run in 1915 as an example of WWI literature; WP doesn't want it. It's been quite a lot of work, and doing a good review is a lot of work, and my feeling is it's not worth it if I can't speak to the issues adequately without the sources. The list of stories in this section, but I prosified it.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
684,176,068
|
== You leave my friend's editing alone! == Hello, Davejohnsan! I'm new to Wikipedia. And I got a special message from you! You leave my friend's editing alone, if you revert any of the edits which my friend posted on any TV shows and seasons articles, I'll be coming after you, I will block you, and I will sue you in court, and kill you! Pure and simple! And you know what, you are not the boss of any the articles, and you piss me off, and I HOPE YOU DIE!!!
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
684,185,575
|
` ==References== Potential sources to add to references and update page: -Bazerman, Max H., Guiliano, Toni, & Appelman, Alan. (1984). Escalation of commitment in individual and group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33(2), 141-152. -Brockner, Joel. (1992). The Escalation of Commitment to a Failing Course of Action: Toward Theoretical Progress. Acad Manage Rev, 17(1), 39-61. -Dietz-Uhler, Beth. (1998). The escalation of commitment in political decision-making groups: a social identity approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(4), 611-629. -Drummond, Helga. (2014). Escalation of Commitment: When to Stay the Course? Acad Manade Perspect, 28(4), 430-446. -Kiel, Mark, Tan, Bernard C. Y., Wei, Kwok-Kee, Saarinen, Timo, Tuunainen, Virpi, & Wassenaar, Arjen. (2000). A Cross-Cultural Study on Escalation of Commitment Behavior in Software Projects. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 299-325. -Dmitri G. Markovitch Dongling Huang Lois Peters B.V. Phani Deepu Philip William Tracy , (2014),``Escalation of commitment in entrepreneurship-minded groups``, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, Vol. 20 Iss 4 pp. 302 - 323 -Moon, Henry. (2001). The two faces of conscientiousness: Duty and achievement striving in escalation of commitment dilemmas. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol 86(3), 533-540. -Sleesman, D. J., Conlon, D. E., McNamara, G., & Miles, J. E. (2012). Cleaning up the big muddy: A meta-analytic review of the determinants of escalation of commitment. Academy of management Journal, 55(3), 541-562. -Ming-Hong Tsai & Maia J. Young (2010) Anger, fear, and escalation of commitment, Cognition and Emotion, 24:6, 962-973, DOI: 10.1080/02699930903050631 -Whyte, Glen. (1986). Escalating Commitment to a Course of Action: A Reinterpretation. Acad Manage Rev, 11(2), 311-321. -Wieber, Frank, Thurmer, J. Lukas, & Gollwitzer, Peter M. (2015). Attenuating the Escalation of Commitment to a Faltering Project in Decision-Making Groups. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(5), 587-595. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
684,193,163
|
` Here's another example from a cast announcement. Notice how there's a list of Additional Voices up front to handle all the other assorted roles. • `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
684,250,368
|
REDIRECT Talk:William Hughes, Baron Hughes
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
684,258,291
|
Please consider this proposition: the probability of a true date after 622 CE is less than 20%. tabiibnafsanii
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
684,271,157
|
==I trust...== ... you have all seen this.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
684,272,591
|
:ISBN formatting is not a standard part of AWB, you have to use a user module. The bones of mine are at . Regards, .
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
684,279,381
|
:It's not a brand new Flickr account though. And it's not rare for photographers to publish their images on their own accounts. If he is the photographer, he has full rights on the copyright of the image and is allowed to do so. Flickr doesn't work with a verification system though, so it's up for debate.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
684,284,547
|
== Net worth == Is it appropriate for her net worth to be put out there? It's only an estimation from a tabloid and doesn't seem to serve any real purpose on the page.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
684,294,848
|
::SammiB is probably mother/wife/sister/daughter (but hopefully not all at once). COI doesn't come into CSD at all. That's more the province of AfD and/or the talk page. I agree with MusikAnimal that speedy isn't really appropriate here - check the references and look at notability rather than significance. I've not looked into the article with more than a glance. If there are IMDb refs, that's a good way of checking reality and possible hoax - if the ref goes to someone else's page, start thinking hoax. IMDb doesn't count for notability, but it's a good jumping off point, and like Amazon, lack of presence on IMDb means more than presence does. Think about that... As to the blanking, I wouldn't worry. The case is open, and the tag will be replaced if proved. I rarely bother tagging user page - I can't usually find the template and the clerk or closing admin will see to all that anyway. If I've blocked per WP:DUCK and there's nothing contentious, I just stick one on the talk page with a link to the master or sock.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
684,302,834
|
I am glad that wikipedia has realized the malicious intent of the wikicohen account.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
684,312,823
|
== Civility == I was perfectly civil. Sincere too. Trolls amuse me.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
684,315,447
|
` :``Cliftonian`` just removed the word ``Jew`` out of 999 Wikipedia articles about Israelis. He doesn't want people to know about successful Jewish people from Israel. That's his deal once again in this article. :Check his contributions page. `
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
684,342,266
|
I saw your edit, the following line that is C.Fred (talk | contribs) deleted page Signa Vianen (A7: Article about a real person, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject) I urge you to delete the reference stating that the Article was about a real person, which not etc. etc. Are you implying that I lack importance or even significance, because a Wiki page did not utterly describe me. I did not publish the page about myself, and when I saw it years ago, I left it at that. I only checked if the facts were OK and over the years somebody sometimes helped me to make a few changes. But I never bothered about it so much as to expand it by adding all kinds of sources. no need. My relevance is not to be measured by how many articles I published in your country, because I was never a journalist in your country. In fact, you wouldn´t even be able to understand anything I wrote because I am not even English speaking. You are clearly going by double standards here. When a Wiki editor uses words like crap whenever editing pages about living people, credible people with a solid track record, that in itself is UNACCEP LE. And I was not the only one complaining about ´´him´´. Also, please be aware of the FACT that there are a number of pages, people with my similar background, cultural background that is, who have even less data. And there is nothing wrong with that, because among ourselves we know our importance. Nobody from out of nowhere will come in and refer to it as CRAP. I was attacked by a stalker yesterday and I called it to Wiki´s attention because it was one crazy addition to the page. The stalker even changed my nationality, changing me into a Caribbean national which I am most definitely not. I guess that kind of gibberish will prompt the creeps to come out and complete the feast. I have come to the conclusion btw that wiki editors are not necessarily the most credible folks, since they always hide themselves behind a fake ID. Eraser of Stalker Edits
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
684,344,544
|
Wiki editors who don´t even know my language, are covering up their editing mistakes and now
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
684,348,962
|
::::::K, let me know what you think when you get a chance. -
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
684,350,795
|
FYI, people do not even take Wikipedia serious. I just thought you should know. I on the other hand proved myself years ago. Furthermore, it was I, MRS VIANEN, who prompted that the page should be deleted. I insisted on that, as the page was about me and somebody published it years ago and I didn´t even bother to expand it. But I did work my butt off year after year and I have a sold track record to prove such. Also, you nor your colleagues are even able to determine what is what, in terms of claims of significance or notability, because I published my articles in another language, not in English. And you deleted the proof of such. No matter what authentic proof other that those already presented on said page, it would just be confusing to you and your kind. We do not speak the same language. Period. Eraser of Stalker Edits
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
684,352,754
|
As a matter of fact, I myself requested the page to be deleted and my name is Signa Vianen. I prefer sticking to the facts rather than going around insulting innocent people. Furthermore, it is not up to you to decide whether or not one has been succesful when you cannot even understand the language they speak. Eraser of Stalker Edits
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
684,355,254
|
Go use your drugs, insignificant nobody. Eraser of Stalker Edits
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
684,380,081
|
== Semi-protected edit request on 6 October 2015 ==
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
684,434,291
|
== 16:review of submission by Haririhariri == hello! i made some changes and everything should be okay now. i believe i resubmitted. please let me know if you received and if there are still issues with our references. very best, tara
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
684,438,010
|
== do you know what i say gas the mother fucking jews == ANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHANHERO KILL YOURSELF DRINK BLEACHhttps://www.google.co.uk/search?q=911&biw;=1280&bih;=929&source;=lnms&tbm;=isch&sa;=X&ved;=0CAYQ_AUoAWoVChMItIXUiKmuyAIVAnA-Ch1EAQwj#imgrc=ZYmCQQJ_CDjsjM%3A
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
684,446,666
|
Old time radio I think there must be some mistake. I didn't make a test. I promise I didn't vandalise. I'm sure you misunderstood any edits. Well, no harm, no foul and bygonesyou know. We're all people.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
684,451,928
|
::Size in down 65%. Taking a break to look at the newly created split-offs. Creating Other Redskins sports teams removed a lot from Native American mascot controversy but I also need to remove most of the sports team content from Redskin (slang).
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
684,453,451
|
WikiDan61 you dont have any brain your brain less person u cant see notability and unknowningly delet page same done on SACHIn G lokapure page do u have any brain hope less person
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
684,455,204
|
go to heal shemless WikiDan61|WikiDan61
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
684,456,739
|
shemeless and my ass RA0808 talkcontribs
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
684,458,410
|
` Mile- I don't know what you mean by ``agreement``. There are different types of miles listed on that page. I am only trying to contribute. Isn't that part of what wikipedia great, that anyone can be a part of it? Please Doug, I will show you kindness. Please show me the same.`
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
684,468,982
|
== English RU cup articles == Great effort in putting together the series of articles on the RU cups over the years, lots of good work there!
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
684,471,246
|
:: Explain me the 'personal attack' please ? Ventu swearing at me when I point his/her mistake on Bipasha basu filmography ?
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
684,471,366
|
#It is reasonably well written. #:a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): #:: #It is factually accurate and verifiable. #:a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): #:: #It is broad in its coverage. #:a (major aspects): b (focused): #:: #It follows the neutral point of view policy. #:Fair representation without bias: #:: #It is stable. #:No edit wars, etc.: #:: #It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate. #:a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions): #:: #Overall: #:Pass/Fail: #:: Two major and one minor things here: * The images in the Features section should get a caption that points out that they show villages in the museum. * Generally, both the Features and the Facilities section read like promotion for the museum, with words like rich, not only interesting from the tourist angle, high end costumers and interesting gifts. The Facilities part in particular has a tone that is not acceptable for an encyclopedia. * Source wise, the article relies to heavily on the museum itself, and those links are all dead. A lot to do here, even for such a small article. I am placing it on hold for seven days for now.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
684,505,490
|
== hey == Go discuss in the talk page first. Stop violently removing content. Thanks ''''
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
684,512,850
|
To say anything of the Sikh Gurus taking any inspiration from Bhakti movement is fallacious. Sikh Gurus included the writings of other saints in the Guru Granth Sahib; implying that as taking inspiration from them is false. From Parasaraprasna, Kapur Singh, Guru Nanak Dev University Press, Amritsar : Thus those who see in the origin and contents of the Sikh movement anything of this VaiSlJavism or the historical Bhakti movement of the Middle ages, which was based on this VaiSDavism or cognate propositions, show a complete lack of understanding ofthe real nature of Sikhism. Beyond the fact that Sikhism is of historical proximity to this Bhakti movement of the Middle ages, and that it somewhat partakes of the atmosphere and temper of VaiSDavist climate, it has not much in common with the latter. Among the principal features of this climate are its anti-Brahmanical attitude, its preference for vernaculars26 over Sanskrit, its total surrender theory, such as Lokacarya's marjara27 doctrine, its stress on devotion through image-worship rather than through knowledge, and its own peculiar forms of ritualism, such as caste-marks. It is easy to demonstrate that similarities of Sikhism with some of these features are not so intimate or fundamental as to suggest any direct or indirect borrowing.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
684,516,632
|
` : I remember I had asked an experienced muslim Wikipedian about whether or not my user page violates WP:UPNOT. And he told me that it doesn't! Apparently Wikipedia allows some description of our personal beliefs on our page. And as for the movie, I have no connection or commercial ties with it. The movie was just recently released in Iran and Canada and it has received many positive reviews. And I thought it can help to counter the wave of Islamophobia in the West. And this has actually been one of the motives of the movie's producers. And that's also why I thought it is useful to share it on my page. However if it qualifies for ``blatant`` promotion I have no protest. But I really don't have any commercial relation with that! `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
684,547,135
|
divbox|grey||This does not appear to be an article submission, but rather, a question. Please not that the articles for submission process is for submitting drafts of encyclopedic articles. If you're looking for general help, considering asking at our reference desk. Thanks
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
684,547,572
|
== Poles in mythology == Now we have a new article Poles in mythology, Please see and include suitable improvements , if any, in article Poles in mythology. Rgds
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
684,558,320
|
::::+ The Hartnell bit came in at from edit summary: add.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
684,607,852
|
I've added a 'Covers' Section here mentioning the Diva version, & for any others in future. If there's any merging to be done I think the Diva song article should be added to the Diva band's main-page not here in any more detail. (Bardrick). 7 October 2015.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
684,650,483
|
== This edit == #This logo is PD-ineligible, isn't it? # If you thought Commons didn't allow trademarked images, it does. #It should at least be tagged with and SVG'd. -
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
684,653,712
|
You can even get e-mail through wikipedia.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
684,696,922
|
:Both of you = My balls
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
684,701,100
|
:: Lol at casting aspersions on an authoritative text, coming from the press of one of the most reputed Universities in India (check the book), and written by the only professor ever accorded the title of the National Professor of Sikhism. :: Lol also at inferring historical proximity and partaking (=joining-in) as being an inspiration ?? Especially when the author clearly says that doing so shows a complete lack of understanding of Sikhism. :: At least you tried to raise some seemingly logical concerns. The comments from the rest of the mob above are not even worth responding to. Yes, it is a mob, and nothing else. Anyone with an impartial point of view reading this discussion would understand it. The mob can keep writing whatever it wants. Zero credibility though !!
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
684,701,559
|
of one of the most reputed Universities in India and the world
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
684,710,770
|
}} {{WikiProject Food and drink|class=|importance=
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
684,733,016
|
Alsee I have clearly stated my historical relevant and mathematical critical reason for stating that Cantor was and is Russian - the impact that had on his career and life cannot be understated in respect to the German school that was so overly critical of his work - failure to acknowledge that by claiming he was German completely misses this subtle but highly significant point - it was PIVOTAL in his life - you rely on Encyclopedia Britannica? - a pop-knowledge source? - I am a degreed Historian who also happens to be a degreed Mathematician - it is not about claiming Cantor for Russia - he was Russian there is nothing to claim - and yes - you are where you are born - regardless of passports - Cantor was Russian through and through whether in Germany or anywhere else - it behooves you to leave the correction as I made it because it is factually correct - had Cantor been born German his work and life would have turned out far differently - period
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
684,734,151
|
Oswah the article claims he was born in St Petersburg and lived there until 11 -if that does not make Cantor Russian nothing else will- he was NOT German despite what that Great Beacon (?) of pop-knowledge Encyclopedia Britannica claims - the impact his Russian-ness had in having him and his work accepted by the German school is a direct cause of his later mental health issues - to deny that is fallacy and sweeps over perhaps the MOST critical aspect of his life - I do not need any source - YOU are my source - to claim he was German is wrong - period- I am a degreed Historian and Mathematician and bristle when I see such ignorant bias to claim him for Germany - he is / was and will always be Russian so call it like it is - not as the historical revisionist want to claim it - had he been any less successful I would most certainly expect German to disown him now as they did then - he is ONLY claimed by Germany because of the enormity of his work and impact it had on modern mathematics - something I in fact disagree with but get it right and PLEASE leave my CORRECT correction ...
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
684,737,154
|
:: Big deal. Go ahead and block. I will see to it that you are blocked.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
684,744,613
|
But this is Wikipedia. Does everyone have to ask permission to edit, contribute or write a page? I'm not vandlising, or ignoring anyone. The only repeated behavior is when people vandalise my edits and ignore the fact I'm trying to help.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
684,746,726
|
== You fascit Nazi! You socialist bastard! You filthy Hippy! == You dare touch my edits again and I'll go to where you live and kick your ass in person. It shouldn't be hard to find. Communes smell worse than slaughter houses. I make edits. I don't vandilaze. Get off your high horse.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
684,750,883
|
October 2015 You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anyrobinhood. Thank you.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
684,755,250
|
:For the record, PiCo did everything 100% according to the rules while Gabby Merger is the one who has been edit warring (reverting against consensus three times already), pushing a fringe view, attacking other editors and violation WP:OWN. That makes the accusation above seem downright outlandish.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
684,756,286
|
` == Oberrothenbach == Can you please assist and/or ell me on what templates and articles Oberrothenbach can link to? I'm also confused on the difference between a town, village, and municipality in Germany. In my country a village is a small town... `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
684,761,575
|
Happy birthday to Andrew Frank Hatch age 117 if you go by Social Security or 111 if you go by the 1940 census . Either one still a major achievement for a man.
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
684,761,697
|
Nope Not happening.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
684,775,755
|
Your statements are not warranted.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
684,784,516
|
I remind readers to note the insultive manner in which editor TheRedPenOfDoom tried to justify edits he made, whilst deleting authentic sources. He literally used the words ´´crap´´. I am not the only one complaining about his manners. His name is # 4 on the list of Wiki editors guilty of cyberbullying. And I can te4stify to it, I felt his mean spiritedness immediately as he started working on a page I was a person of interest in. Odd experience. Then the others jump in, like a pack of bloodhounds. One would swear that I was some criminal!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! http://wikipediawehaveaproblem.com/evidence-of-cyberbullying-wp-editors-and-admins/
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
684,784,732
|
!!!!!!!!!!!!!! They have this strategy of passing the ball to one another and pretend there is transparency, whilst there is none. Amateurs who pretend they can decide who is who.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
684,787,328
|
:Discussion now at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard#Harold Camping -
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
684,795,915
|
` :::::::Hello, Tgeorgescu... It was correct what you added, sourced, and valid what you put in, according to context, and according to WP due and undue and sources. Your edit and addition were valid and correct, and arguably warranted, and I would never revert what you put it, because it happens to be referenced and sourced and what's stated by majority scholarship on this issue. So it was a valid modification and elaboration etc. To what I put in, that was also sourced. As WP policy recommends, ``modify instead of wholesale deletion``, to improve not remove. And again, the point of Wilson and Cahill was in the context of the very section and paragraphs themselves, of rationalizing or explaining why Egypt herself never chronicalized things like the 10 plagues or the Hebrew exodus out of Egyptian slavery etc, or the destruction of Egyptian charioteers and soldiers or of that then reigning king of Egypt. Of course majority historians discount it ever actually happening, but it's also known and admitted (as a general point) that ancient pagan nations or kingdoms in general would not always be so honest or straightforward or complete in their recording of everything. Embellishing some facts and details, while minimizing or even totally hiding others. And that was really the point. Anyway, thanks for your work on it too. It was a bit blunt, but it was quoted correctly. Regards..... `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
684,803,475
|
in that way, or at all,
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
684,804,128
|
` ::::::::::Hi, Doug Weller. I don't have the actual book, but see the references in another book, but I don't know hwy you say I got his name and book name wrong. How exactly? Also, you missed the point about it being from the 1960's, as that actually BOLSTERS UP my point and what I said repeatedly ``long-held`` and ``long-established`` explanation. (And it's in the very name of the section that I put on here, if you notice...``long established``). So, frankly, given that, I'm exactly not sure why you're complaining about the ``half a century ago`` matter, instead of seeing the arguable pro and point for that, in what I was saying all along. It's a long-known thing that ancient cultures sometimes hid things and embellished others. Also, again, how and where exactly did I get his name wrong? His name is J.A. Wilson, and he did write a book (according to what I have) called ``World History of the Jewish People`` in 1964. So where's the error exactly? Please let me know. Thanks.`
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
684,804,528
|
` (As for Jeppiz, again, your behavior was arguably rude and appalling and dismissive and ignorant (by your own admission) and ``I don't like`` and not acknowledging the quoted WP guideline of ``minority view`` given SOME mention, but just ``not as much``, etc etc. I'm not perfect, and neither are you, if that's the case. And also the ``modify instead of revert`` etc.. And you lied about my ignoring ``Bold, Revert, Discuss``, as that's all I've been doing here, for hours, on this talk page, which you show no respect or appreciation for. So as I said, you're very pot-kettle-black...though I tried to discuss and present and work here with you.) `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
684,805,359
|
== Hi yourself == You're not missing anything, it's just incompetent leadership. He was TECHNICALLY doing the right thing, so the admins refused to intervene, despite common sense obviously dictating that he wasn't hurting every page he edited. And I have no idea why he refused to simply update the timestamps. It makes no sense to me. But that's Wikpedia, man.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
684,811,258
|
Please check out the stuff on the article TALK page. Not just edits and edit comments. Thanks.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
684,811,302
|
` And I've been discussing copiously, and this editor says I have ignored ``Bold Revert Discuss`` when that's all I've been doing for hours.) Please check out the stuff on the article TALK page. Not just edits and edit comments. Thanks. Regards.... `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
684,811,527
|
` (And yes, wrongly putting additional jabs on my own talk page, beyond just a ``3RR warning``. But a hypocritical ``I'll report you if you say not nice things about my on the article talk page`` comment, though he has said VERY insulting things about me on the article talk page. Can dish out but can't take it. I do NOT have this same issue with the Doug Weller and the other contributor there, you'll notice.) But he removed whole sentences of my comment on the talk page, that he didn't like. Unbelievable. `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
684,811,590
|
But he removed whole sentences of my comment on the talk page, that he didn't like. Unbelievable. He has glaring double standards and incivility and bad faith attitudes and violations.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
684,812,233
|
can't stand you either, as you already know
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
684,813,089
|
` ::::So Jezz gets to personally attack, assume bad faith, and violate WP policy by removing chunks of material from my own comment in an article Talk page. Gotcha. I do not accept your decision as valid, fair, or equitably applied. I only wrote on Jezz's talk page because he was violating WP policy and insulting me and undoing my comments on the article talk page, and ignoring and disrespecting all the work and good-faith presentations I made on the article talk page. You agree iwth him removing chunks of my comment on the article talk page, though WP does not allow that? You're facilitating bad behavior on HIS part...by totally ignoring it, or not seeing it, and singling me out in this matter. Very wrong. Did you even read what I wrote on your talk page? I'm not saying I was necessarily totally perfect in the edit situation time-line or in my tone on the talk page. My point, sir, is Jezz has been farrr from perfect himself, and has definitely violated WP policy, yet you won't even see it, or get on him for it, or block him for doing all this. You notice I did not ``personally attack`` Doug Weller or Tgeorgescu. Why? Because they were civil and cool. (And you never gave me a full chance to even defend myself on the notice board page. So I don't agree at all with your action.) Jezz has been unquestionably out of line and you don't see any of his stuff on the ARTICLE talk page, or the nonsense and bad-faith insults and accusations and negativity he hurled at me left and right. Why is that? `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
684,813,730
|
is what he's been, just frankly speaking...accusing me of what he has BLATANTLY done himself!!
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
684,813,911
|
In individual comments.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
684,816,096
|
` ::::Also, as far as BlackCab, again you don't know that HE has ``personally attacked me`` and others, with words such as ``deranged`` and that BlackCab over the months and years has been in LOTS of trouble and notice pages. You're being too hasty and quick without all the facts and knowledge. And singling me out, as if BlackCab and Jezzy are saints or something. Sighs... Far from the truth. (No, seriously, they have been rude and unfair, but for some weird reason you just don't see it anywhere with Jezz...even though he unquestionably violated WP, and has been uncivil and disrespectful and hypocritical...with lies and double standards. He said I did not talk about the article itself (a lie) and only soapboxed him as if he never said anything negative about me in individual comments of his. And he also said that I ignored ``Bold Revert Discuss`` when I have been discussing a great deal. ::::I get your point that I re-inserted earlier on before discussing, but you're acting like not violating 3RR means absolutely nothing. There's a balance, beecause I know that edit-warring can happen even without breaking 3RR, but it's not like I did not put big work and presentations and rationales on the article talk page, taking time and energy. Totally unappreciated by Jezz (and apparently by you). You notice so-called uncivil remarks and behavior from me and nothing from Jezz, which makes me question your analysis to be honest. He's been horrendous and you don't even seem to care or even admit it...or see it! He wrote individual comments soapboxxing against me. That goes un-addressed (accept by me). And then he insanely accuses me of what he was blatantly himself guilty of doing. Unbelievable. `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
684,843,351
|
:Done! Pre Aug 31st Nanos are sample size ÷ 4 (Haven't dealt with 31 July, it's get ÷4 right now too) . Post 5 Oct EKOS sample size ÷ 3. Also added a bit of transparency (80%) so that overlapping polls are visible.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
684,850,984
|
` == More examples needed? == The structure of the page is flowing, and it is convenient for those who want to know certain information of Death Note since the classification is really detailed. The most effects Death Note has made are argument for and against whether it is appropriate for audience of all ages or not and if there will be crime based on it. I think more events should be included, and I'm pretty sure they are easy to be found since there are bunch of examples in twelve years, for example the news article ``'Death Note' passed around elementary school terrifies students, parents`` posed by EYEWITNESS NEWS wfsb.com.`
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
684,876,922
|
` == File:AAC2-1.jpg listed for deletion == A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AAC2-1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
684,888,872
|
== TPB, you keep swapping into older endings. == I don't see the point in having an unstable link, and at least add the Alexa rating of the highest site. I mean if you are going to be stubborn about the site's ending don't edit out useful information.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.