rev_id
int64 37.7k
700M
| comment
stringlengths 5
10k
| year
int64 2k
2.02k
| logged_in
bool 2
classes | ns
stringclasses 2
values | sample
stringclasses 2
values | split
stringclasses 3
values | attack
bool 2
classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
681,780,287
|
` ::::::Not YET. There's no rush. Read how scary the ``boomerang effect`` is to me right here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ScrapIronIV#Please_help_with_vandalism I'm just taking my time. I need to put all their violations together - like denying the line of communication with authorities, publicly denouncing Wikipedia policies, bad faith mass-deletions etc. Also I'm male, so you can stop applying the wrong pronoun to me if you're educationally able™ (as if everyone with a nickname is gender-identifiable by their nick, like you, for example. Definitely not you, ``Ponyo``). It's just my courtesy to give Balloo and Scrap time to prepare. ::::::HEY COWARDS! (THIS MEANS Hullaballoo AND ScrapIron) YOUR CURRENT RESPONSE TO MY ``Don't forget a link to a page where I can complain to authorities`` BULLET-POINT IS, FOR SOME REASON, ``Unsourced content is a scourge to editors``. HOW ABOUT A REAL ANSWER? DO YOU AGREE IT SHOULD GO TO https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents or maybe posting at another section of Admins' noticeboard will have maximum effect and speedier discussion? THIS IS YOUR LAST CHANCE TO PROVE YOU'RE NOT COWARDLY WEAKLINGS. STEP FORWARD AND SAY ``I'M SURE WHAT I DONE IS RIGHT. I'M NOT AFRAID TO BE SCRUTINIZED``.`
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
681,781,018
|
` ::::I'm sure you'll do finely without me heralding to you the latest developments. It goes much better than you think. Previous freak's edits were quickly abolished and for 2 years the page was safe. Until you appeared. But that's not for long. Also, do not delete ``He was also blocked in the past: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Hullaballoo_Wolfowitz#Maybe_we_could_back_away_from_the_cliff``. THIS IS NOT PERSONAL ATTACK - THIS IS PURE TRUTH, AND THE SENTENCE IS FREE OF CONNOTATIONS. THE TRIAL ALWAYS CHECKS IF THE DEFENDANT HAS A HISTORY OF BEING PUNISHED FOR OTHER CRIMES. I'll start the reporting process itself soon, more details on this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Hullaballoo_Wolfowitz#Stop_vandalizing_.22CMNF.22_article `
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
681,781,251
|
::::::::I don't care, I haven't got a Wiki nickname and my IP is dynamic. Duh.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
681,801,765
|
:::::Strange because I actually typed the tildes in again. It might be easier in the future to just make a reply with a new sig instead (or just not mess up in the first place).
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
681,811,437
|
That is EXACTLY why I asked so vehemently to be blocked. You know for a site that claims to be righteous and forgiving when it comes to this kind of thing you are pretty underhanded. Can I create a new account? No because the idiot that blocked me in the first place put that under the block parameters. What evidence is there of personal attacks and harassment? If you cannot answer that then you CANNOT block me. It's a very simple concept to grasp. ````
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
681,812,491
|
Cilivity? HA! Don't get me started. I would be very cooperative if the people that run the site would be. What is civil about falsely accusing an editor of harassing and personally attacking someone else? Nothing.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
681,835,296
|
` == Great. More cowards == One more coward - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ponyo (``admin``, ``overseer``, etc., etc., but still a coward). In fact, 3 or 4 cowards none of whom would provide me with a link to complain about https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hullaballoo_Wolfowitz 's unwarranted deletion of good half of the CMNF article. Wikipedia - the home of cowards?`
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
681,835,685
|
Also, a 48 hour ban?? Ridiculous. A real nice ban starts at 1 month. Even better is 1 year. But this all is only until I reset my modem... You also can't ban/block me via network range, as my ISP is huge and uses different FIRST NUMBERS (before the FIRST point) in their IP nets. So wildcard ban won't work.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
681,850,478
|
:::::::::I'm only here to improve the encyclopedia, don't feel humiliated. But clearly as an editor I'm Caravaggio and you're Bob Ross - and that's being very generous. Although I am now becoming bored of your pidgin English trolling, childish edit-warring and other low-level harassment. As a prelude to the report - please explain why you suddenly developed your recent WP:INFOBOXREF obsession, why you apparently only apply it to articles recently edited by one editor (me) and why you don't apply it to the height field(?) It appears to me that you are disrupting wikipedia to make a point.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
681,878,626
|
== Wash your dirty penis before giving shit == Wash your fucking dirty penis before giving shits
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
681,903,027
|
` ==Mama's Family edit== I myself was confused and didn't even know Eunice the movie had a page until yesterday when I clicked that ``Eunice`` link to be directed to the character page but realized it was for a movie. I actually follow the Mama's Family pages closely and was surprised to learn the Eunice movie has had a page for nearly a year. I have tried to resolve the matter by putting in a clarification in italics. If you still take issue, we'll have to open up the debate on the talk page to third and fourth parties but we're not allowed to continually revert each other. And since you'd be the first to break the 3-revert rule, I am just warning you that you'd be the one in danger of being blocked. `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
681,906,286
|
` == Newcastle == Please do not move to again. It has been attempted before, several times, and was reverted each time. There has been no discussion on the matter since 2011, so any move must be preceded by a fresh WP:RM discussion which concludes with consensus to move. Please see also WP:NCUKSTATIONS. `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
681,919,238
|
` ==Poll to ``keep`` or ``remove`` film clarification== There is an edit in dispute on the Mama's Family article between and myself. I would like to keep ``film article`` or at least ``film`` in parenthesis beside ``Eunice`` in the opening so that it's clear there exists an article for the film as opposed to the character. I myself had no idea we had an article on the character until yesterday (nearly a year after the article's creation); I thought it was just a link to an article for the character. Just for clarification purposes, I thought there was no harm done in having film in parenthesis next to the name, but I have been reverted several times by who keeps saying there is no confusion. Given that he himself created the article and knows of its existence, I really don't feel he should have any say as to its confusion. I feel I am a more reliable source to go by as I had no idea of the article's existence and pressed that link to be directed to an article on the character. So now I am creating a poll to see whether or not we should keep or remove ``film article.`` ::Keep - based upon my reasons listed above.`
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
681,920,272
|
`I'd also like to make note that, for the most part, only 2 users have edited the ``Eunice`` article, further giving the impression that people probably aren't viewing the page for reason they believe it's an article on the character. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
681,920,954
|
` :One would think as the creator of that article, you would want to make its existence unequivocally clear and have no problem with my clarification efforts. Your response to challenge me on my efforts to clarify has been the opposite of what one would expect given I'm only trying to make the article's existence clear. :Whatever the case, it seems we're not going to see eye to eye on the edit so I've put together a poll on the Mama's Family article talk page, as shown here Talk:Mama's Family#Poll to ``keep`` or ``remove`` film clarification. Feel free to add any side to the argument you feel I didn't cover within your vote on the matter. :Also, just an fyi, it doesn't matter how polite you are in a revert war, breaking the 3-revert rule is against Wikipedia policy and is grounds for a block. When an edit war is taking place, wikipedia policy states that users are to hash it out on the article talk page and if that doesn't work, request the opinions of other parties outside of the debate on the matter. As it seems you and I are firmly in disagreement, I have skipped to seeking the opinion of other parties. Cheers! `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
681,944,595
|
` == ``Not them`` == I'm not exactly sure what the hell this phrase exactly means, but the simple fact of the matter is that I have not even been on Wikipedia for most of the period I have been harassed by Jbhunley. This has been going on for months and it is a disgrace. You and other moderators seem to be condoning bullying behaviour, and I am being censured for even calling it such.- `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
681,945,439
|
` == Condoning Bullying == I have not really been around for weeks, indeed months, but I have been suffering regular harassment from Jbhunley, and you and others seem to be condoning his behaviour. It is never acceptable for someone to give another person unwanted attention for months on end. * Many of the articles he nominates for deletion should be tagged, not deleted. Wikipedia needs improvement, not amputation. * The number of my articles he has nominated is well up in double figures. * He does not seem to read or research the articles he nominates properly. * He does not have much or any knowledge about some of the thousands of articles he nominates. * He seems to have no understanding that people have lives off Wikipedia. I cannot spend SIX HOURS dealing with one of his mistakes. You seem to have little understanding of what ``personal abuse`` is. Coming back after weeks, or even months, and finding someone is still trawling through my user history and leaving messages on my page - that is personal abuse. If he is acting within the rules, it is about time the rules were changed. Wikipedia was not set up to be a toxic environment, full of cliques, it is supposed to be the encyclopedia ``anyone can edit``.- `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
681,951,021
|
:: You actually explained the answer I should be given. A Documentry is not a movie. Also if you haven't seen it how can get involved on the topic. This not a GA review on a topic?
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
681,953,519
|
Thank you everybody who voted
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
681,966,818
|
if I promise to stop spamming any more
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
681,966,901
|
I KNOW, READ THE APPEAL ON TOP.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
681,967,292
|
, (well it wasn't spam before it just got deleted)
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
681,967,528
|
::I only got blocked for spamming. I promise you I won't spam, so what can I say else? If you tell me what is wanted of me I will do it. The advertising campaign failed, I tried bit it failed. I got annoyed with the editors that were creating obstacles for me naturally, but now I won't spam again, I won't attack people either, that is a sure promise.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
681,970,667
|
:::::I have no obligation to answer anything to you. I address only the admins.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
681,979,278
|
REDIRECT Talk:The Shape Shifters
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
681,989,800
|
:::: Oh is it a vote we are agreeing on or on the content ? And where did I say that documnetries shouldn't include on filmographies? If so I would blank the whole section, YES? Don't try to twist please. All I'm saying is this Documentry is not about Kapoor and she has no direct involvement towards this, just only because being the reason she had been interviewed for it, this shouldn't be included on the list. I hope I'm clear on my point. Anyone please comment after watching the Documentry to say I'm wrong with your point, so we can end this topic.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
681,993,437
|
== 3rr == You're at 3rr again mongoboy. Seriously how long are you going to keep this up? Until the unlikely event that you ever get a girlfriend or job and have to move out of your sweaty mom's basement? Why don't you fuck off to the wikipedia of whatever language it is you actually speak!? Perhaps your stupid edits and spectrum disorder would be appreciated there. I doubt you would last two minutes at wp.de because they would not put up with you anything like as long as you've somehow lasted here.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
681,995,852
|
==National team== Player scored in 2010 African Women's Championship qualification, so can't have made her debut in 2014.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
682,002,325
|
:::Can you point me to where it says she made her senior international debut in 2014? Cheers,
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
682,003,046
|
:::::Can you point me to where it says those are her only caps and goals with the senior national team? Cheers,
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
682,005,008
|
::::::With respect I think you are perhaps making the same error you did at Bia. We can't present incomplete statistics as if they are the full statistics - because it's misleading. Is this clear?
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
682,005,450
|
` ==RE Jackie Collins== Thanks for all your help. Way too many edits to thank individually. Yours, `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
682,006,081
|
:::Ukrainian press is a joke. They don't want objectivity, because it would contradict with their actual intention of falsification and manipulation. You don't need to walk far, check Anatoli Sharij on youtube.
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
682,011,171
|
Obviously, no-one ever bothered to give a reason for this article not to comply with straightforward encyclopaedic standards. This is because there is no reason. Obviously, they prefer to simply revert among their little cabal of squatters. Why do they want to keep this article in a poor state? Stupidity, or malice? It must be one or the other.
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
682,012,502
|
` :::I totally agree with the above commenter. The entire first half of this article is way too dense and full of complex terms. I had to wade through it and re-read it several times before I could understand what exactly it was trying to say, and I wasn't even sure I got it right then. The intro to an article ought to summarize the topic in clear language that normal people can understand. I also was inclined to fix it myself, but found myself not entirely sure what the paragraph actually SAID! That doesn't seem like a desirable state of things on a wikipedia article. If you want to give the ``official church definition, in all of its obfuscating glory, fine, but it should be accompanied by a statement that ``in plain terms, this means...``. ::::I appreciate the effort to make this article clearer, and I support changes which will bring about that goal. But we need to work carefully and not misrepresent the topic. ``time otherwise spent in prayer, good works, and other penance`` is only part of the picture. The addition did not mention Purgatory at all. ``showing contrition`` for sin happens in the Confessional too, so that needs to be clarified. Indulgences can be gained without making a sacramental Confession, these are partial indulgences. No mention is made of applying the indulgence to souls in Purgatory - this is a fault in the whole article, not merely in the proposed addition. Indulgences were never sold, this is a myth that is debunked in the article itself, yet it found its way into the proposed addition. I suggest that rather than making unsourced additions, we consult sources such as primer on indulgences and myths about indulgences and CUF - Indulgences and the sources already in the article, and see what we can build from there. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
682,013,512
|
== Lenore Skenazy == So, you think that truthful, referenced information is vandalism? Apparently it doesn't agree with your viewpoint which is totally against what Wikipedia is about. Looks like it's time for you to discontinue editing if your personal views override facts.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
682,013,750
|
== Lenore Skenazy edit == I posted factual information that is referenced. If it's against your viewpoint, then that's too bad. Wikipedia is not based on your viewpoint, but the truth. If your personal feelings override the mission of the website, then it's time you stopped editing.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
682,014,157
|
== Disruptive edits/deletions from members. == It appears that persons on Wikipedia are uncomfortable with the truth when it differs from their personal viewpoints and wish to throttle the truth. What I posted was the absolute truth and referenced, but some apparently did not like it. This is much akin to book burning and only hurts the validity of Wikipedia.
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
682,014,511
|
It's referenced and her exact quotes potato. Just because you do not agree with the truth doesn't mean it shouldn't be on Wikipedia. You are only hurting the purpose of the website and apparently and do not deserve to be editing anything.
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
682,016,698
|
Copyright violations? Methinks you are sorely mistaken an obviously shouldn't be editing anything if you think referencing news articles are copyright violations.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
682,019,257
|
Edits which reference quotes from the subject of the article should not be subject to deflation unless you are an opponent of the truth NeilN. Do you have a problem with the truth?
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
682,019,680
|
It appears you are mistaken Fred. The edits deleted the information entirely, and as other articles here on Wikipedia that are not edited contained the information. It appears that you all are opposed to the truth, which is against the principles of Wikipedia. The Nazis would be proud.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
682,021,637
|
:If you look up, just a couple of inches on your screen, you'll see the reason for making this change. And you encouraged vile personal attacks against me, so if you don't think they should happen, condemn them when you see them even when it's your pals making them. Now, I have explained my edits plenty of times in clear edit summaries and on this talk page. You've never once bothered to explain why you are undoing them. How about you start now?
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
682,027,877
|
== Attack LOL! == Please don't attack? Please. What Neil did was worse than any attack I could have possibly made you liberal douchebag. Go stick your finger up your own ahole, (which I'm sure you do daily anyway) you nerd.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
682,033,460
|
I can change my IP at will asshole.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
682,037,412
|
::I made the same highly offensive personal attack against you that you made against me, so it's funny to see you spit the dummy now. You haven't bothered to give any reasons why you think the article should start by talking about a different topic instead of, as the consensus embodied in the entire definition of the project as an encyclopaedia composed of articles requires, covering the topic defined by the title. Do you understand the concept of an article?
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
682,045,423
|
` {| style=``background-color: #F5FFFA; padding: 0;`` cellpadding=``0`` |- | style=``border: 1px solid #084080; background-color: #F5FFFA; vertical-align: top; color: #000;``| {| cellpadding=``0`` cellspacing=``5`` style=``vertical-align: top; background-color: #F5FFFA; padding: 0; width: 100%;`` |- | Hello, Kennedicaye, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on , or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! |} {| width=``100%`` style=``background-color:#F5FFFA;`` |style=``width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top``| {| width=``100%`` cellpadding=``0`` cellspacing=``5`` style=``vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA`` ! Getting started |- |style=``color:#000``| * A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored * How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article *Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard |- ! Getting help |- | style=``color:#000``| * Frequently asked questions • Tips * Where to ask questions or make comments * Request administrator attention * Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on * Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page |- ! Policies and guidelines |- | style=``color:#000``| * Neutral point of view • No original research * Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources * What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons * List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry * Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy * External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines * Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability |- |} |class=``MainPageBG`` style=``width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top``| {| width=``100%`` cellpadding=``0`` cellspacing=``5`` style=``vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA`` ! The community |- |style=``color:#000``| * Build consensus • Resolve disputes * Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette * No personal attacks • No legal threats * Community portal • Village pump * Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists |- ! Writing articles |- |style=``color:#000``| * Be bold in editing • Develop an article * The perfect article • Simplified manual of style * Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation * Peer review • Featured content |- ! Miscellaneous |- |style=``color:#000``| * User pages • Talk pages * Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award * Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism * Join a WikiProject • Translation * Useful templates • Tools • User scripts |- |} |} |}`
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
682,048,305
|
Welcome! Hello, Sidv18, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for registering an account with Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: * The five pillars of Wikipedia * How to edit a page * Help pages * Tutorial * How to write a great article * Simplified Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
682,050,820
|
::::Oooooh aren't you a sharp one! Well then, you'd better run around undoing all the basic and obvious changes you can find, lying about me, falsely accusing me of vandalism, and leaving me inane messages. Have fun!
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
682,051,239
|
Fan Bias affecting article== It's clear there is a bias going on here that is preventing Nikki and Brie from having their own separate pages. They are each notable figures in professional wrestling history that deserve their own pages like any other pro wrestler. Just because you don't like them shouldn't affect their status as wiki subjects. ==
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
682,051,504
|
::::Obviously it would be far, far too much effort to look at the edits I made to self-arrest, see that they vastly improved a very poor article, and warn those who are disruptively reverting for no reason at all, wouldn't it? Easier to block me for getting annoyed at wanton destructiveness, eh?
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
682,051,726
|
== Edit summaries == You love to revert, we can all see that. You never, ever bother to explain why, presumably because you don't know why, you just know that you love it. If you don't have a reason, don't revert, and if you do have a reason, say what it is.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
682,052,005
|
` == Reverting for no reason == I spent quite some time improving an article that was in a poor state. Now two people have undone all my work with a click of a button. You didn't have the courtesy to explain why you reverted it, but you still had the fucking cheek to accuse me of leaving an inaccurate edit summary. No-one's that stupid so you were plainly just out to provoke me. Well fucking well done, consider me fucking provoked. I guess you didn't even bother to look at the changes before you put all that shit back. *Self-arrest refers to various maneuvers employed in mountaineering **It doesn't ``refer`` to that; it is that. You want to say ``Paris refers to the capital city of France`` or ``Nile refers to a river that flows into the Mediterranean``? *sliding down a snow or ice covered slope arrests (stops) the slide ** You think readers are too stupid to understand what ``arrests`` means in this context? *himself or herself ** You think the single word ``themselves`` is some how better expressed in three words? *and/or ice axe ** You never bothered to read WP:SLASH? * These potentially life-saving techniques must be practiced frequently in order to maintain proficiency ** This website is called wikipedia, not wikimanual. But you never bothered to read WP:NOT, did you? That's just the first five, I made many more, I left the article looking considerably better and more encyclopaedic, but then you came along and fucked it all back up again. Do you feel proud? `
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
682,052,300
|
::::::All of my edits are constructive. Find me a single one that wasn't.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
682,052,482
|
` == Reverting for no good reason == So, after I took quite some time to improve an article that was in a poor state, you undid all my work with a click of a button, leaving only the summary ``rv - although currently unsourced, the content is technically correct``. Clearly, you have no idea what constitutes encyclopaedic quality. Clearly, you just thought it would be fun to piss someone off. Did you find it immensely fun? Did you laugh a lot to yourself at the thought of the time of mine that you'd wasted? Did you chuckle for ages at the idiocy you forced into the article? Let's just look at the first few changes I made, that you delighted yourself by undoing. *Self-arrest refers to various maneuvers employed in mountaineering **It doesn't ``refer`` to that; it is that. You want to say ``Paris refers to the capital city of France`` or ``Nile refers to a river that flows into the Mediterranean``? *sliding down a snow or ice covered slope arrests (stops) the slide ** You think readers are too stupid to understand what ``arrests`` means in this context? *himself or herself ** You think the single word ``themselves`` is some how better expressed in three words? *and/or ice axe ** You never bothered to read WP:SLASH? * These potentially life-saving techniques must be practiced frequently in order to maintain proficiency ** This website is called wikipedia, not wikimanual. But you never bothered to read WP:NOT, did you? That's five, I made many more, I left the article looking considerably better and more encyclopaedic, but then you came along and fucked it all back up again. Do you feel proud? : No one cares how long you spent on writing you WP:OR, neither does it belong on Wikipedia. Your behaviour on this editor's talk page breaches WP:NPA, WP:CIVIL, and your edit summaries and general behavioural pattern are pure WP:BATTLEGROUND. If you persist in such behaviour, you will end up being blocked from editing. I am about to add a standard 'welcome' for IPs who think they know how Wikipedia works to your talk page, and trust that you will read our policies and guidelines carefully before you continue editing. ::Exactly what OR are you referring to? `
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
682,052,847
|
==Idiocy== I made a number of changes, clearly described in edit summaries, which vastly improved this article. Now a series of utter morons have taken it upon themselves to revert my work for no reason whatsoever. I'd ask them to explain themselves here but they have no possible explanation for what they are doing, so I just put this here to note how some people of appallingly limited intellectual ability are here not to build an encyclopaedia but simply to play some kind of bizarre game.
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
682,052,978
|
:Still waiting for you to justify your risible claim of OR. Also, stop stalking and harassing, eh?
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
682,053,898
|
==Idiocy== I made a number of changes, clearly described in edit summaries, which vastly improved this article. Now a series of utter morons have taken it upon themselves to revert my work for no reason whatsoever. I'd ask them to explain themselves here but they have no possible explanation for what they are doing, so I just put this here to note how some people of appallingly limited intellectual ability are here not to build an encyclopaedia but simply to play some kind of bizarre game. :Pretty hilarious that one of these sick idiots says to discuss things on talk while going around removing everything I post on talk pages. Seriously, what a fucking child. Pathetic.
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
682,054,324
|
, 21 September 2015 (UTC) ::I made the same highly offensive personal attack against you that you made against me, so it's funny to see you spit the dummy now. You haven't bothered to give any reasons why you think the article should start by talking about a different topic instead of, as the consensus embodied in the entire definition of the project as an encyclopaedia composed of articles requires, covering the topic defined by the title. Do you understand the concept of an article? 03:44
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
682,054,944
|
` :#Don't make personal attacks against me :#``the implementation of German policy of systematic and mostly successful destruction of the indigenous Polish-Jewish population`` has much the same meaning as ``a genocide officially sanctioned and executed by the Third Reich during World War II``. But if you prefer a particular wording, then simply edit the article accordingly. `
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
682,054,996
|
` == Reverting for no reason == I spent quite some time improving an article that was in a poor state. Now two people have undone all my work with a click of a button. You didn't have the courtesy to explain why you reverted it, but you still had the fucking cheek to accuse me of leaving an inaccurate edit summary. No-one's that stupid so you were plainly just out to provoke me. Well fucking well done, consider me fucking provoked. I guess you didn't even bother to look at the changes before you put all that shit back. *Self-arrest refers to various maneuvers employed in mountaineering **It doesn't ``refer`` to that; it is that. You want to say ``Paris refers to the capital city of France`` or ``Nile refers to a river that flows into the Mediterranean``? *sliding down a snow or ice covered slope arrests (stops) the slide ** You think readers are too stupid to understand what ``arrests`` means in this context? *himself or herself ** You think the single word ``themselves`` is some how better expressed in three words? *and/or ice axe ** You never bothered to read WP:SLASH? * These potentially life-saving techniques must be practiced frequently in order to maintain proficiency ** This website is called wikipedia, not wikimanual. But you never bothered to read WP:NOT, did you? That's just the first five, I made many more, I left the article looking considerably better and more encyclopaedic, but then you came along and fucked it all back up again. Do you feel proud? :Still waiting for you to justify your risible claim of OR. Also, stop stalking and harassing, eh? `
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
682,056,865
|
` :Well praise be. It's vanishingly rare for someone with a username to get blocked for reverting anonymous edits, no matter how many times they do so within 24 hours. The most I saw that someone didn't get blocked for was 31. So, nice to see it happen here. You should block ``Iryna Harpy`` for the insane series of reverts at self-arrest as well, 4 in less than an hour even if you don't count the sock puppets. `
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
682,063,040
|
REDIRECT Talk:Anglo-French War (1627–29)
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
682,079,850
|
**** other than this, we're good to go.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
682,091,224
|
== COI == What is your relationship with ?
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
682,129,979
|
` == Would you please move the last comment == Hi John, I made a discussion section for the proposal. Would you consider moving your comment to keep the proposal focused without comments? `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
682,137,739
|
::::: So why haven't you added Singh is bling back ? You formatted Singh is bling to Raaz 4 ? Blindly ? Reference says Singh is bling? You didn't want to listen to me when I was right. Yes? Don't try to act smart staying you only format some text, for you to format letters, you should be looking at what the content ask well. You are the rotten tomottoe here. Invite ? Oh I didnt know I need invitations to work on wiki ? Are you trying to say you own the article now ?
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
682,167,912
|
`Feel free to back up your unfounded claims with real-world happenings. http://www.encognitive.com/files/Top%20Japanese%20Surgeon%20Uses%20Gerson%20Therapy,%20Publishes%20Research.pdf Are you even mildly educated on the number of documentaries that investigated the number of clinics that implemented Gerson's therapy? IE: The documentary ``Dying to Have Known.`` Are you too closed minded to even acknowledge the thousands of testimonials that exist? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxyEJaEo6n8 What's your answer to the above doctor implementing the therapy with his patients, who claims to have a 75% success rate? Are you ACTUALLY going to tell me that it's ineffective, the people didn't actually have cancer, or that it cured itself? You're a closed-minded and biased bigot. Prove me wrong.`
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
682,168,087
|
` Feel free to back up your unfounded claims with real-world happenings. http://www.encognitive.com/files/Top%20Japanese%20Surgeon%20Uses%20Gerson%20Therapy,%20Publishes%20Research.pdf Are you even mildly educated on the number of documentaries that investigated the number of clinics that implemented Gerson's therapy? IE: The documentary ``Dying to Have Known.`` Are you too closed minded to even acknowledge the thousands of testimonials that exist? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxyEJaEo6n8 What's your answer to the above doctor implementing the therapy with his patients, who claims to have a 75% success rate? Are you ACTUALLY going to tell me that it's ineffective, the people didn't actually have cancer, or that it cured itself? You're a closed-minded and biased bigot. Prove me wrong.`
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
682,168,654
|
`Hospitals in Japan already implement the therapy and have had sweeping success. Do tell how it ``accurately describes`` its dangers when you have testimony after testimony after testimony. Oh, wait, let me answer that for you, bigot; ``Oh well uhhh, you know, cancer cures itself sometimes, or it was a misdiagnosis.`` Is that what you tell yourself at night? I think it's glaringly apparent you're willfully biased and uninterested in the facts. The fact of the matter is Gerson Therapy has/had been implemented time and time again; if the treatment were ineffective, do tell, why do thousands of testimonies exist? Magic? Oh wait, let me answer that again, ``well uhh you see it was a misdiagnosis.`` Don't worry, I got your back. When you can discontinue from being a closed-minded bigot, feel free to come back with something of substance that isn't blatantly biased in the favor of drugs, which do nothing for human health. == ``Melatoma``? == What's melatoma? Is that a typo? I'd fix it, but I'm no medical expert. Perhaps there is something called melatoma. :The source cited says melanoma - I've corrected the article. == Beyond uneducated and biased wiki page == ``The therapy is both ineffective and dangerous`` First of all, I believe the writer of this page needs to look into people such as John Christopher, Richard Schulze and Bernard Jensen. Following your research, you need to look into Hippocrates Health Institute. These men and that institution implements many dynamics of Gerson Therapy, and all have had wildly impressive results with numerous testimonies. The supporting sources make vague allusions to ``inconclusive`` results simply because no large-scale studies have been conducted. ``There is very little scientific evidence to support the use of other components of the Gerson regimen`` ``There have been no well-controlled studies published in the available medical literature that show the Gerson therapy is effective in treating cancer.`` As per the very site you source. The fact of the matter is Gerson Therapy and its many dynamics have been in use by a multitude of other alternative health practitioners and institutions, all the while having more success than our modern cancer treatment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ``As per the very site you source. The fact of the matter is Gerson Therapy and its many dynamics have been in use by a multitude of other alternative health practitioners and institutions, all the while having more success than our modern cancer treatment`` This is entirely untrue. Please provide citations and exact pieces of information for your rebuttal. Feel free to back up your unfounded claims with real-world happenings. http://www.encognitive.com/files/Top%20Japanese%20Surgeon%20Uses%20Gerson%20Therapy,%20Publishes%20Research.pdf `
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
682,168,991
|
Snake-oil pluggers, now that's a cute one. You want to talk snake-oil? In what world do you pump a body full of chemotheraphy, hoping to poison the cancer out of a human body? You're an uneducated bigot. http://www.encognitive.com/files/Top%20Japanese%20Surgeon%20Uses%20Gerson%20Therapy,%20Publishes%20Research.pdf
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
682,178,824
|
'Intent to disrupt'? You're a special kind of stupid aren't you? Why the 'Intent to hide the truth and facts' from you liberals who are akin to book burners?
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
682,184,220
|
::I also agree. There is a lot of information surrounding the band & album which, whilst related to the main article, deserves to be separate. Barny
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
682,197,594
|
Drastic change are you serious? It's outdated, it's an update. Its easy to look up. It's common knowledge.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
682,208,944
|
`==3(a) Main aspects===== As mentioned above, expanding your review of reliable sources will probably be the best way to ensure coverage of the major aspects. Here are tips for searching PubMed and Google Scholar. PsycINFO and PsycARTICLES are two other valuable databases for relevant peer-reviewed journal articles. == Search Strategies for Mentally ill people in United States jails and prisons == **************** PubMed (MEDLINE) **************** http://PubMed.org How to use the PubMed Advanced Search Builder https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dncRQ1cobdc How to use the PubMed Filters Sidebar https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=696R9GbOyvA How to Use MeSH to Build a Better PubMed Query https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uyF8uQY9wys Example: ``Mental Health Services``[Mesh] AND ``Prisoners``[Mesh] AND ``United States``[Mesh] PubMed Help http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK3830/ Finding Systemic Reviews in PubMed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK3827/#pubmedhelp.Finding_systematic_reviews ================================== MeSH terms relevant to the article ================================== - MeSH Major Topic [MAJR] - Primary - Community Mental Health Services Criminal Law Humans Mental Disorders Mental Health Services Prisoners United States - MeSH Major Topic [MAJR] - Secondary - Odds Ratio Risk Factors Severity of Illness Index Socioeconomic Factors - MeSH Subheadings [SH] - Primary - Crime/statistics & numerical data Homeless Persons/psychology/statistics & numerical data Mental Disorders/diagnosis Mentally Ill Persons/legislation & jurisprudence Mentally Ill Persons/statistics & numerical data Prisoners/statistics & numerical data Prisoners/psychology Prisons/statistics & numerical data Prisoners/psychology Prisoners/statistics & numerical data Prisons/statistics & numerical data - MeSH Subheadings [SH] - Secondary - Crime Victims/statistics & numerical data Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology Mental Disorders/economics Mental Disorders/epidemiology Mental Disorders/psychology Mental Disorders/therapy Mental Health Services/economics Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data Psychotic Disorders/epidemiology Schizophrenia/epidemiology Substance-Related Disorders/rehabilitation Substance-Related Disorders/diagnosis Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology Substance-Related Disorders/psychology MeSH Terms [MH] - Sort Adolescent Adult Female Male ************** GOOGLE SCHOLAR ************** Google Scholar Search FAQ https://scholar.google.com/intl/en-US/scholar/help.html#searching How are documents ranked in Google Scholar search results? ``Google Scholar aims to rank documents the way researchers do, weighing the full text of each document, where it was published, who it was written by, as well as how often and how recently it has been cited in other scholarly literature.`` Google Scholar Search Tips https://scholar.google.com/intl/en-US/scholar/help.html Using Google Scholar https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1ZwgDeX2eQ Example search query: ``mentally ill`` prison* (limited to years 2005-2015) https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22mentally+ill%22+prison*&btnG;=&hl;=en&as;_sdt=1%2C34&as;_ylo=2005&as;_yhi=2015&authuser;=1 ===`
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
682,210,599
|
` == The Signpost: 09 September 2015 == * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * == The Signpost: 16 September 2015 == * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
682,288,627
|
Harrias is a douc hebag.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
682,303,052
|
== Syria Iraq Map == The YPG don not control that section of river west of Hawl and East of Hasakah, yet you show that on your map. You also claim that the rebels control towns that they do not, on the Syria static map. The ones north of the ISIS pocket in Suwayda. These do not even exist on the online template map! What are they doing on this map? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Syria_and_Iraq_2014-onward_War_map.png You also need to update these areas on your map: Palmyra, Zabadani, Deir Ezzor, Ayn Issa. I am guessing that you are pro-Kurd, and I have no issue with that, but you also need to show the actual frontline between ISIS and Kurds! Pro-kurdish sources have reported that ISIS is fighting kurds on the kurdish territory behind the frontline you show! https://twitter.com/sylezjusz/status/640969685685673985 What would be ideal is if you update the entire map by screenshotting the webpage https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Syrian,_Iraqi,_and_Lebanese_insurgencies_detailed_map Instead of making peacemeal edits in certain areas that ignore all of the changes in the map, such as town size fixes, location fixes, nonexistent town removal, minor gains, etc. You need to show this on your map, so show it! Update the map according to the online map instead of deciding which edits on the online map were biased or not. For example, ISIS clashing with YPG in Heisha village wasn ot a biased edit, as pro-kurdish forces reported it just recently. You must show this, please!
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
682,323,218
|
:Yes, related, I'm not sure if the Ali mentioned in the article is the same person. I personally think that this situation may make him worthy of an article of his own.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
682,329,609
|
==George Jackson (conductor)== I think this might interest you since you commented in the first deletion attempt. Please visit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Jackson (conductor) (2nd nomination)
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
682,333,665
|
` == Bewilderland == The introduction includes the comment:- ``The story is told in the form of an episodic quest, and most chapters introduce a specific creature, or type of creature, of Tolkien's Wilderland``. I edited the last bit to Middle-earth because:- (1) the introduction to creatures begins with Chapter 1, which introduces Hobbits (and Wizards and Dwarves), and continues with chapter 2 (which introduces Trolls) and chapter 3 (which introduces Elves). These creatures are not limited to ``Tolkien's Wilderland``, and in fact the individuals introduced (Bilbo, Gandalf, Thorin & Co., etc.) do NOT live in Wilderland. Wilderland is properly the region east of the Misty Mountains, and Bilbo does not reach it until chapter 6. (2) Furthermore, many of the creatures first encountered in Wilderland (e.g. Men and Dragons) are not unique to Wilderland in Tolkien's Middle-earth. (3) I'm aware that Middle-earth in not named in the book. However most readers of Wikipedia would have heard of Middle-earth, and few would have heard of Wilderland. (4) In any case a link is required. But I guess whoever reversed my edit knows better. Regards, `
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
682,382,685
|
` :::::What I know about the subject is irrelevant, what can be added and verified is. There's no need for ``better`` images, the ones in use aren't suitable to the article. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
682,398,101
|
Full name:Cigale ahmed mohamed Birth place:Mogadishu,somalia Birthday:1st july Gender:male Favorite color:black favorite food:somalian food favorite place:Makah al mukarama Likes & dislikes Things that I do not like are: Noise pollution, disrespecting others and mistreatment of animals. Things that I like are: Make new friends, success in school, continuous learning, determination and never giving up. My best hobbies are playing football , PlayStation , and Xbox One . Best friend All my village,school mates and social network are my friends and I love them, but my best are Ahmed abdi nasser ahmed,ilyaas ibraahim haaji and ilyaas aabi mohamed. 3 things you carry with you Quran Mobile phone The people’s love in my heart ) 3 wishes I wish to restore our Arabian glory because I believe our nation is so great. I wish that our nation becomes advanced in technology. I also wish to pray at Al-Aqsa Mosque in Palestine.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
682,412,926
|
== Hello from == Hi JAaron95 I am new to Wikipedia and looking for some advice please. As you can see from my email address I work for Think Money Group (www.thinkmoneygroup.careers ). In 2012 we purchased the Ocean Finance business (www.oceanfinance.co.uk) from AIG. You can see a media report of this deal here: http://www.mortgageintroducer.com/ccstory/244330/5/EXCLUSIVE:_Think_Money_buys_Ocean_Finance.htm At present if you search for Ocean Finance on Wikipedia the AIG page comes up https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_International_Group#Business (there used to be an Ocean Finance page but it now just redirects). Is it possible to update / correct the AIG page to make it clear that they sold Ocean to Think Money in 2012 please. Thank you, Ian
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
682,418,539
|
== Happy days. I have been unblocked. == It seems there are people within Wikipedia who have the wisdom to judge others, including their sincere appeals to be unblocked, in a fair and reasonable manner. With this in mind, I would like to inform you that I have been unblocked and look forward to making many useful and positive contributions in the future. My aim is to become a top level administrator so I can treat other contributors with decency and integrity and, hopefully, not allow any personal bias, petty-mindedness or delusional sense of power to cloud my judgement. As I believe you were the person who 'permanently' blocked me (despite my contrite, heartfelt and cogently argued appeal not to do so) I thought you might be interested to hear of my aspirations.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
682,421,781
|
` ::I have done a fair bit of copy-editing on the lead, part of which involved balancing out the ``positives`` with the ``negatives``. I consider myself neutral. One suggestion I would make is to append a brief mention of the recent political problems to paragraph 2. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
682,431,277
|
== Terry Hurlock == Piss off, cretin.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
682,432,002
|
` You're very quick with the templates. How about some original thought? Can you explain what were the ``bizarre unsourced alterations`` that you think we are edit-warring about? `
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
682,432,413
|
` Mmmmm? ``angering and alienating users and making this website a hostile and aggressive place to come.`` Who's the pot and who's the kettle?`
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
682,432,657
|
:: Thanks for your recent more. AGF? As I say, pot & kettle.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
682,432,804
|
== Ella Ridge View Holiday Inn == Hi sam, You have mentioned that the page got copied contents from the site.But the reason is i am the owner of the site too.The domain is registered under me and all the contents there are written by myself.Can you please consider this fact and help me to resolve this issue.Thanks for your quick review!
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
682,434,625
|
Are you unable to answer my question?
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
682,449,615
|
this is typical Wikipedia/Who gives a S~~t
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
682,530,833
|
== Shattuck and Hussey == Thank you for creating Shattuck and Hussey. I have added Young Women's Christian Association Building (Nashville, Tennessee), a building they designed.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
682,543,041
|
` ::::I wonder if Mr Corbyn refers to himself as a ``Crown Servant``? `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
682,570,215
|
:: Yeah, the result is pretty clear here. I actually already swapped Option 1 into the article, it seems unlikely that anyone is going to object at this point.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
682,599,688
|
::Yes Wugapodes sums it up well.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
682,601,543
|
You not only corrected the english, for that I agree, but you also spoiled dates of the matches there, such as using words behind numbers (20 October > 20th* October, this isn't necessary because it's against the Template:Use dmy dates) and also you removed some other dates. You also removed and some international matches and gatherings when they were totally right and sourced.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
682,613,553
|
` :: The claim in the Wikipedia article is that ``Hari's claims that these chemicals are dangerous have been strongly refuted by experts in science and medicine.`` Among the chemicals in question is aluminum, perhaps the most prominent in the CSI source. Therefore by reasons of logic, this claim in the Wikipedia article is that experts in science and medicine refute that aluminum is dangerous... at all. And that is contradicted directly by a source that does meet MEDRS standards. Something is wrong here. :: What qualifies the idea that aluminum is linked to Alzheimer's as ``fringe``? On what basis are you citing fringe? What exactly are you calling fringe? Are you calling Hari as a person herself ``fringe``? Or are you calling concern for exposure to some chemicals ``fringe``? What exactly? Thanks in advance for clarifying. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
682,619,045
|
`::Matt (with a K). Why yes, Matt, it will. In fact, a failure to respect the pronunciation of the person could be taken as creating a ``hostile environment`` and possibly subject the perp to both criminal and civil penalties. Its kinda strange you don't know this. It is neither smart nor correct to claim that since many are ignorant, that Wikipedia has to mirror their ignorance. In my opinion, the pronunciation closest to the original should be first, and common alternatives could also be included. Why should we have to choose only one to include here? There is, of course, a problem in determining which of alternative(s) to include, if there is more than one. (I'm sure you can also find (rare) examples of the individual pronouncing his/her name differently over time or to different audiences (languages, countries).) Is it Ine-stine or Aine-Schtine? (sorry, I don't/can't do IPA). Of course, another problem is that the ``correct`` pronunciation may not be within the range of the speaker's repertoire, this is common with 'foreign' names. (Several Japanese companies I've worked with have instructed their executives to adopt and use an English name when dealing with Americans, this also occurs with Chinese, to my knowledge.) `
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.