dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
58,866,571	== school page == for the last few says i couldnt get on the school's web page i thought it had be shut down but its up. http://www.corpus.pa.net/	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
58,867,483	:You in no way justified your deletion of my edits on the Byzantine Literature page, you simply removed the pictures as they either a) offended your atheist sensibilities or b) as some childish way of offending me. This will be reported.	2,006	false	user	blocked	test	false
58,868,487	== Stalking == you little shit you need to stop following me around wikipedia and deleting every fuckin thing i write	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	true
58,869,131	== cowboy == your quite the cowboy admin kungfuadam.	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
58,870,691	== sorry i jumped to conclusions == on christian terrorism article man, I don't agree with you, and I want you to go and listen to 'prophet of doom' (now in audio format) as it is good. But I was wrong to be so rude. It is not the Southern European way.	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
58,872,378	== Picture of Heraclius instead of Constantine XI? == We know Heraclius is credited with the formal side of hellenization, he also emphasized a greek Nationalist struggle in persian wars. I think it is therefore more suitable to put him down as the 'formal' turning point in Roman History when Roman Empire became 'Hellenized' fully. Also, maybe Nikos Kazantzakis instead of Venizelos? We need a representative of the Arts up there, he is Greece's greatest contemporary author.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
58,873,643	` Also, about controversy, the ``Axl of old`` would have flipped the crowd off and went home and WOULDN'T gone back out on stage after the crowd throwing things, shoddy work on the stage, and a poor soundbooth.`	2,006	false	article	random	test	false
58,875,517	:Nazism and religion Nazi mysticism Nazi architecture Category:Nazi physicians Nazi human experimentation Nazism and race Nazi songs Nazi mysticism etc...	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
58,875,704	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=Nazi&fulltext;=Search Nazi Search] [	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
58,881,461	== Malay and Malaysian == Hello. I've noticed that you are trying to merge Malaysian culture and Malay culture into one category. It is important to realize Malaysia and Malay are two different terms describing two different things. Malay is not necessarily Malaysian and a Malaysian is not necessarily Malay. A citizen of Malaysia is called Malaysian and not Malay. Malay is an ethnic group, not an adjective to Malaysia. I hope you could revert all your edit concerning the two categories.	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
58,886,984	A white guy rockin' the 'rows? Talk about an insult. This style is almost exclusively a style for African-Americans, and females at that. I don't see a problem w/the white guy, but not as the main picture. Changed.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
58,889,344	Asked and answered. See numerous other submissions on this 'point'.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
58,893,407	somebody should put 40 glocc down because either he is a mike knoxx or he is signed to g unit cause he says in almost every song that he is a g unit soldier.	2,006	false	article	blocked	test	false
58,893,448	` Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the Guitar page on Wikipedia! Your test worked, and thank you for reverting or removing it yourself. The best way to do tests in the future would be to use the sandbox. You can look at these pages as well: how to edit a page, the tutorial, and how to write a great article. All of these pages are good places to start. Again, thanks, and we hope that you will like Wikipedia. `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
58,893,612	==Vandalism== Hello George this is CAYA you vandalised my home page and I just wanted to tell you THANK YOU! your welcome back anytime.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
58,897,882	You do not have to acknowledge TWO urban centers, only acknowledge that Boston is no cultural or business hub for CT. Put away your pride and go back to this: The New England region of the United States is located in the northeastern corner of the country. Boston is its most populous city, and the business and cultural hub for all but the Connecticut, which is oriented toward New York City. New England is made up of the following states: It is simple and keeps your point while only changin one line instead of the whole article. What you or whoever wrote was way worse and far more complex. It made a SIMPLE change into a major problem. All because of pride in the form of New England fundamentalism.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
58,901,752	== I agree. == I agree with all this. I served as a member of the C6F staff from Dec. 1990 to Dec 1992, when the flagship was onboard the USS Belknap.	2,006	false	article	random	train	false
58,910,744	` :The fact that it is in the ``accused`` category instead of just Category:Terrorist organizations implies that the accusation was and is hotly disputed. In fact, are you suggesting that there is any accusation of terrorism that has ever not been disputed by someone or other? :Essentially, you are a Lehi supporter trying to make Lehi look as good as possible. Compare this with the situation with Al Qaeda. There, I am having a hard time keeping the article in Category:Organizations accused of terrorism, not because there is anyone wanting not to label the organization, but because everyone wants it in Category:Terrorist organizations! It's crazy. You partisans want your favourite terrorist organisations free of labels, and your enemies' organizations labelled as ``terrorist``. Since there are more Jewish and Christian people editing Wikipedia than Muslims, this means that some get the label, and others don't. :I'm afraid that this situation is not acceptable. Pro-terrorists are going to have to accept that we have an NPOV policy, and that all of these organizations will be categorised in a neutral manner. — `	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
58,911,012	:Note also that the policy does not say to avoid using the word terrorist, but to avoid describing people are terrorists. That is to say that it is fine to give quotations or note accusations by third parties.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
58,913,660	` :It would be uncivil to call you a dickhead. To note that you are pro-Lehi is simply to state the obvious. Our point is so strong that there is no way to help or weaken it. :``Almost exactly the same``? The same except that one is POV and the other is NPOV. — `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
58,914,281	`::I must apologize profusely. It is chaf that is the velar fricative (``ch`` in Scottish loch): hhet is the same sound, for non-Arab Jews, and a uvular fricative (much further back in the throat, as in Arabic) for Mizrahim. I got the two terms muddled up because my browser does not support IPA symbols properly so I couldn't make sense of the table. Please edit accordingly. `	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
58,916,520	` Mr Anonymous, First of all...the three we are discussing are at least 103 years old...would you like to tell them to their face. Second...you are wrong...the Treaty of Versailles was not signed until 1919. There was instability and the war continued in Russia, and Germany's government was in turmoil. US soldiers were needed to keep the peace. I suppose the US war in Iraq ended May 1 2003 with 'Mission Accomplished'. NOT. You simply don't understand that a war EFFORT is exactly that. Many of the so-called 'veterans' were working typewriters, driving delivery trucks, etc. These three could have seen more action than that...such as Julio Ereneta, picking up mines. Since the peace treaty wasn't signed until 1919, it is arguable that the war ended in 1919. At the very least, these men were recruited to replace those sent to war...if there had been no WWI, they would likely have never joined. Moreoever, we see veterans like Moses Hardy, recruited in 1918, returned to the US in 1919. In fact most WWI veterans did NOT return in 1918, they returned in 1919. Finally, this list is intended to include possible WWI veterans; did we really verify the Polish claims? We can throw out a case like Merlyn Kreuger because, one, he is 89 not 103 and two, he never served at Fort Dix as he claimed. These three, however, DID serve, and were called on to serve by the US gov't due to WWI. Thus, at least SOME people would include them as WWI veterans. It's not for you alone to decide. I think a disclaimer is already balancing it out.→ {ł} `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
58,917,644	Mrs. Trellis which I am certain is a sockpuppet has a lot of time on his hands it seems. The survey is obviously one of a fraudulent nature. Why? Because I am certain if it were a bonafide survey, then at least one if not several more of the respondents would of replied that Wales is the land of RUGBY but as Mrs. Trellis may have little or no interest in sport, he failed to include this as a response in his self-serving survey.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
58,918,165	` ::``Wales is popularly known as ``the land of song``, and is known as the home of many musicians and musical styles``. This is a contention. This is not a fact, all countries have some semblance of musical culture and heritage, in my view Wales cannot be differentiated from these countries on this basis. In other words, I would not pick Wales out as being known as the home of many musicians and musical styles above any other country, the citations offered do not qualify this contention. Please remove it. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
58,925,513	== I am not an anti-semite == Enough said. Stop trying to smear me as one. I request a full apology from your for your blatantly false and hurtful accusation. You may contact me via Special:Emailuser/Blu Aardvark. \| \| (contribs)	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
58,929,341	Hey, I know with the Estatut coming up your nationalist fervor is buzzing. Please find somewhere else to express it. If you don't like Majorcans, Valencians, basques, Catalans, Andalusians or Gallegos being Spanish it is your own problem. Majorcans are Spanish and they want to be Spanish. You cannot force them to be anything else.	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
58,931,364	` == Block/unblock == Frankly, I can't be bothered reading the whole post on ANI. FWIW, I have always felt that this user was redeemable. I think the question is, 'does he wish redemption'. I invite Blu to post here, indicating what behaviour we can expect if he is unbanned. Then perhaps we'd have more to go on. I have unblocked this user (as one of the two primary ``victims`` of his personal attacks, I feel this is my right). I agree with Doc that I feel he is redeamable. He has agreed to be on his best behavior, and that's good enough for me. :Have you discussed this action with the other involved parties? - ==Workshop== Is this edit you, and do you want it readded? Can't help with the block problem, unless you want me to post on AN or someone else's talk page but {{unblock}} would accomplish the same, mostly. :Yeah, that was me. Thought I was logged in. Go ahead and re-add it. \| \| (contribs) == Suggestion == {Discussion with Malber archived to history} {Further trolling removed} I added the deleted sections to your archive 2 assuming you would do this yourself if not blocked. No need to reply unless you strongly object to this action. :Thanks. I appreciate it. (By which I mean, it's exactly what I would have done) \| \| (contribs) `	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
58,932,037	` == ? == Hi. We never interacted before, but you've generated a lot of attention lately. Just so I can understand a little better why you've come back, could you comment on the following posting of yours on Wikipedia Review? :Whether banned or not, I have no intention of legitimately contributing to their ``encyclopedia`` ever again... not after the way I have been treated, at least. :Oh, I may eventually come back, as a sockpuppet, and make some legit edits, but I honestly do not plan to. The ones in charge of the place are disruptive, abusive, and just flat-out rude, and I have no desire to be a part of that. Have things changed since then? Thanks, — ::To an extent, yes. I've worked out or gotten over my disputes with mosts of the people I have had conflict with. The others, I feel I can avoid. \| \| (contribs) :Thanks for your response. I think it's going to prove quite difficult to avoid some people here, but I wish you good luck. — `	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
58,933,302	`::::Wusses. Binary or nothing... `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
58,938,361	==IK ZAL DE HOND BESSEL DEKKER MUILBANDEN==	2,006	false	user	blocked	dev	false
58,944,740	That last line (the new version is better) is YPOV. This 'new'(your) version just complicates the issue and makes the article less simple to read. Tell me, why MUST Boston be mentioned as a cultural and business hub at all? This seems to be at the heart of your bias. It appears as you want the viewers to get from reading it that Boston is somehow the nerve center and city that New England revolves around and looks up to. Why MUST this illusion be on the page?	2,006	false	article	blocked	test	false
58,945,656	Well actually that helps out my (clearly won and clearly proven, but dismissed in favor of bias) argument since the other parts of CT are not counted as Boston, so it is not hub for ANY part of CT. Also, somone erased this, but I also pointed out that the link includes Torrington, CT which is up by Mass! So now that this issue has been PROVEN 50x over compared to NO PROOF from these editors, to show that you people are neutral(!), now is the time to change that article for truth sake and not because you wish that people see things(lies) the way that you want them to see it. If you read the NY Times, would you want to read lies? Would you want them to just make up stories or have articles read with bias towards an author's opinion? This is what clearly goes on on Wikipedia. Too bad most people think that this is a real and valid source of 'true' information.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
58,951,061	Greco Romanism did not begin in 146AD, with the Roman occupation of Greece, I find it exceedingly annoying that I need to give examples of Roman poetry, literature, sculpture, architecture and theatre, (which before the 1st century AD was simply copy of Greek) and so on influenced by Greece, these are obvious to anyone with even basic understanding of classical history.	2,006	false	article	blocked	test	false
58,966,195	>I often use NJ as an example in my arguements on this issue. The ony difference with NJ is that Philly is right next to NJ as opposed to Boston not being any where near CT. On NYC news, NJ seems to be talked about more than even NYC. I find that weird, but what can you do? This Wikipedia is clearly bias and these people clearly don't want to do anything but put their opinions as assumed fact on here so I will resort to terro tactics, if not shutting this site down.	2,006	false	article	blocked	dev	false
58,966,218	Right on may 26, 1863 which is not the stars and bars ( )	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
58,966,276	` Tuf-Kat, I'm tired. I do not care at all. None cares of these underground genres. Old Electronic music and New Age fans do not need and do not use Wikipedia as primary source. New ``electronic music`` fans, simply ignore or really can't understand differences and proper analogies between genres. So, ther is no point to fill this gap. Though there are thousands people sharing my ``point of view``, there is no way to involve them in a ``battle`` against younger Wikiusers. Feel free to do what you want. Wikipedia is only a stupid game, I'm no longer interested in contributing on these topics. Usually, users that remove dispute templates are immediately banned, but these harrassers aren't yet. Maybe Wikipedia is theirs and none else has to touch their toy. Enjoy it. I'll not post anything else on music genres. Bye. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	true
58,966,873	>That is what I have asked the dude to do - take out the cities, but he INSISTS upon keeping Boston(as the center of the world. Clearly biased) in no matter what. These bastrards on Wikipedia do not know how to compromise or neogotiate. All they know is how they see things or how they want others to see things.	2,006	false	article	blocked	dev	true
58,967,415	>Boston not near CT. Do you have to have Phd to figure this out? Again, Boston is no busniess or cultural HUB for CT. As far as business is concerned, even Hartford might disagree. Besides, CT is in the NY region and we know that NYC is the #1 business and cultural hub for America.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
58,968,255	When the fuck are you goona change the New England article to fit facts? Boston is no business or cultural hub for CT, period!!!!	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	true
58,971,086	Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
58,971,190	::Since its rated teen, pg-13 is appropriate.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
58,977,240	No thanks, I hate Microsoft and any of their products, I believe in free software/open source and freedom. Long live the US Constitution & Bill of Rights.	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
58,978,422	What are you talking about? What edit wars? I'm not allowed to edit my own profile?	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
58,979,004	== I WONDER IF.... == As per your comment that a pic of Mohammed would 'offend' Muslims, I wonder if you'd extend the same courtesy to Christians or Jews? I doubt it somehow, Atheists tend to be totally one sided in their love of Islam and hatred of Christianity.	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
58,984,894	` With regard to your last posting at my talk page, I'm tired. I do not care at all. None cares of these underground genres. ``Old Electronic music`` and ``New Age`` fans do not need and do not use Wikipedia as primary source. New ``electronic music`` fans, simply ignore or really can't understand differences and proper analogies between genres. So, there is no point to fill this gap. Though there are thousands people sharing my ``point of view``, there is no way to involve them in a ``battle`` against younger Wikiusers. Feel free to do what you want. Wikipedia is only a stupid game, I'm no longer interested in contributing on these topics. Usually, users that remove dispute templates are immediately banned, but these harrassers aren't yet. Maybe Wikipedia is theirs and none else has to touch their toy. Enjoy it. I'll no longer contribute on music genres. Bye. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
58,990,773	:As I said, that is your POV. Matiur Rahman wanted freedom for his own nation. By the way, the plane Rahman hijacked was as much East Pakistan's as was West's, and most likely it was bought with the large revenue earned from East Pakistan, since EP earned the majority of export earnings anyway.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
58,993,250	== uhhh == Taco bell is on me is a slogan where I come from, you Deuchebag Mcgee. Do your research.	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
58,994,378	== Ron == The How Smart is Ron has been moved to the talk page. =D	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
58,994,481	:Most people are distracted by the falsely planted rumors about Martians and Venusians, so they are unaware of the true Blugztrakhian threat.	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
59,006,376	: or just some hyperactive GameFAQ fanboy, but yeah, this entire article is pretty terrible. I'd suggest marking it for cleanup, not pov.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
59,010,250	` :You are accusing me of slapping labels on. You are making a comment on my civility. Comment on content alone, not other editors. — `	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
59,010,911	` :::I was telling him and warning him. Now, you treat me with respect or you may have problems. — `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
59,011,501	Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!) Here are a few links you might find helpful: Be Bold! Don't let grumpy users scare you off. Meet other new users Learn from others Play nicely with others Contribute, Contribute, Contribute! *Tell us about you You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on . Or, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. We're so glad you're here!	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
59,012,786	` :::::This is your last warning, fine Wikipedian. Stop your threats and trolling immediately. — `	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
59,014,576	` ::Interesting. I think I'll keep this thread now. It's a very clear example of admin abuse. Because I didn't take your crap on my talk page, you personally blocked my account to spite me! That's pretty amazing. I mean, you can't possibly justify it based on the fact that I pointed out that another editor was a supporter of Lehi. I notice that you have a history of throwing around disputed accusations of ``incivility``. ::Review your own comments on this page. They are a series of taunts and threats. Each time, I failed to rise to the challenge and point out what of person you are. I didn't irritate you with a big orange bar by taking it to your talk page. ::Anyway, there is no point talking to you. You were losing a debate and so restricted your opponent's ability to act and reply. Shows how strong your argument is. — `	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
59,016,216	` ::Hi Chris. Thanks for your note. The reason that the article was tagged for speedy deletion by another editor, and the reason that I deleted it was that it did not ``assert the importance or significance of its subject``. As you correctly state, non-notability is not a valid criteria for speedy deletion; but the absence of a reason why the subject could be notable is. This criteria is describe in more detail in Wikipedia:Deletion of vanity articles. I don't have a strong objection to recreating this article, and I wouldn't try to stand in the way of you doing so yourself - but I think that if it is just recreated in its old format, it may quickly get tagged and deleted again. Can I suggest that you recreate it but add something that rectifies the issue described above? To make this easier I have copied the deleted contents . Cheers `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
59,021,277	` ==Orphaned fair use image (:Image:DanieleSuzuki.jpg)== {\| align=``CENTER`` style=``background-color:#FFFFFF; border:8px solid #FF0000; padding:5px;`` \|- \| \| This media may be deleted. \|} Thanks for uploading Image:DanieleSuzuki.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that your image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If your image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why your image was deleted. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ```` link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ``Image`` from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
59,027,933	Norwich disagrees, he writes in volume 1 of his history of byzantium (the early centuries), that Byzantium was somewhat more stable than European states. The western europeans have always hated the Greek (except the philhellenes), and in an effort to surpass him they try to attribute that pure latin side of the greco-roman history as their own.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
59,027,989	: To answer the question (as Timothy and Mantanmoreland won't), it's sarcasm. He's clearly what would be considered unwelcome to any gathering of Muslims, given the hate speech he makes use of. . I would suggest every effort be taken to keep people like this off Wikipedia. And Mantanmoreland, had what FairNBalanced said and did been directed at Jews or Christians instead of women, he'd be permenantly banned. He got the least of what he deserved, so spare us the 'poor chap' song.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
59,028,142	== You're a motherfucking prick! == So, you don't agree with my comments on alcohol, huh? Well, I don't know where you live (if I did, you'd be dead by now), but you fail at life for supporting alcohol. Go kill yourself, you asshole!	2,006	false	user	blocked	dev	true
59,032,823	:: Mantanmoreland, please read WP:AGF. You cannot know for certain what Irishpunktom's motivations are, much less tell if that particularly violent euphamism is an appropriate one. WP:AGF asks us to assume Irishpunktom's motives are honorable, unless there's evidence to prove otherwise. We should assume the question is a reasonable one.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
59,033,196	Yes, I was blocked for losing patience with you, and what I did then would constitute personal attack. Honest outspoken criticism that is based on fact is permitted though, and the shameless hate speech expressed here deserves more than just vocal criticism. As for you, I'll discuss you elsewhere. This isn't the place for that.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
59,037,325	::: If those phrases are of such significance and popularity, they should be here as well. Zeq, I know WP:NOT, my point was that the article should be a factual account of the use of the phrase. On both sides of the issue, there's alot to be said. The phrase 'aparthied wall' and 'israeli aparthied' is as popular amongst some people as 'war on terror' might be here in the US. It's significant, it's present in public discourse, it should have an article about it here.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
59,040,970	::::::::::::::EXACTLY my point, my friend! Unsourced images should be removed, not selectively removed. These fangirls were only removing the unsourced images which depicted Benson with a boyfriend, and instead posting equally sourced images of her alone. I removed the other unsourced imagery, thank you very much!	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
59,043,880	. I myself have seen the little creatures and I'm sad to see serious, lifesaving, articles been reverted	2,006	false	article	random	train	false
59,047,333	`This is very tiresome, and a typical example of Wikipedia competitive uber-pedantry. There is only one spelling of ``strasse`` - s-t-r-a-s-s-e. This is not a matter of spelling, it is solely a question of how letters are written. The use of ``β`` for ``ss`` is a German orthographic convention, not a different spelling. It is not a convention used outside Germany and Austria, and is not recognised by the great majority of English-readers. They will read it as ``strabe.`` Using it is an insult to readers and is just a form of showing off by Wikipedia editors. Arguing for the use of ``β`` in the English Wikipedia on the grounds that ``they write it that way in Germany`` is the same as arguing that Beijing ought to be written ``北京`` because they write it that way in China. Or perhaps we ought to write all German placenames in Gothic script? `	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
59,053,219	== Leave u alone == then stop following me around and deleting every thing i type ( )	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
59,078,747	` == The NB notice at the top == Can't this be eliminated by simply turning the ``USC Trojans`` page into a disambiguation page rather than redirecting here? That note is trying to do the job of a diambiguation page but it's only cluttering things up. Someone with more experience help me here. `	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
59,079,945	:Here we are!!! I was waiting for this kind of xxx comment (xxx is to spare the appropriate word to qualify SupaStarGirl's comment!!). :The articles on Wikipedia do not belong anymore to anybody once they are posted!!! It means that anybody can come and modify these articles at will, irrespective of the original persons who posted them. So, your remark SupaStarGirl is not a remark from a Star at Wikipedia I could say!!! MichaelIsGreat ==Anymore comments before I close the discussion on this article? And move on with my life (that is not fpcused on wasting it trying to write a PERFECT article (!!!)== Once the discussion is over, I will republish the article with the changes I made and we will all have to leave in peace this article if those among you who censored my useful contribution are capable of such a normal behaviour (I very much doubt it!). MichaelIsGreat	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
59,081,328	:Here we are!!! I was waiting for this kind of xxx comment (xxx is to spare the appropriate word to qualify SupaStarGirl's comment!!). :The articles on Wikipedia do not belong anymore to anybody once they are posted!!! It means that anybody can come and modify these articles at will, irrespective of the original persons who posted them. So, your remark SupaStarGirl is not a remark from a Star at Wikipedia I could say!!! :MichaelIsGreat ==Anymore comments before I close the discussion on this article? And move on with my life (that is not fpcused on wasting it trying to write a PERFECT article (!!!)== Once the discussion is over, I will republish the article with the changes I made and we will all have to leave in peace this article if those among you who censored my useful contribution are capable of such a normal behaviour (I very much doubt it!). MichaelIsGreat ==I ask Tawker to avoid censoring the discussion area by reverting to the previous posting when I made changes. I clearly mentioned the changes I made, openly and there is no justified reasons to revert to the previous posting made on the discussion== Are you now going to censor even the discussion? If I decide to delete what are perceived as personal attacks, it is my right to do so without having someone like Tawker censor this change and revert to the previous posting. Is it clear, Tawker? I would not be very proud of behaving the way you have done. I could qualify your behaviour but I will leave it as it is for the time being. I have very little tolerance for your shameful behaviour, Tawker. Do you get the message? MichaelIsGreat	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
59,081,902	:I am simply supporting the consensus, which is to only include nations of the British Isles. As a matter of fact, I think the Germans are a lot closer to us than the French, but someone else has been trying to argue the opposite and at the same time push all sorts of medievalist, aristocratic fantasies.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
59,082,261	I've again removed your speculative statements about Sopranos characters. Please talk with me if there is a reason you feel it is important this is included in the article. If you find a reference from a reputable source that agrees with your speculation then it should be included, otherwise it is inappropriate. Also the article List of characters from The Sopranos in the DiMeo Crime Family is divided into subsections and the characters are alphabetised within these subsections. You have moved Ercoli DiMeo to the top of the article more than once. I will hazard a guess that your reasoning is that he has the highest rank. However, the article is not organised by rank. To reiterate it is alphabetical as per the wikipedia style guide. Please refrain from moving things out of alphabetical order as it only creates more work for other editors.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
59,082,349	` ==On Makemi’s previous comment== Makemi said ``I'm not clear on how this is revolutionary, it seems like a bigger/faster/louder computer piano.`` I deleted the remark on the CEUS being a milestone. I even deleted anything that could be judged as being a praise. Despite the fact that even the praises I made were based on facts, on the quest that has been going on for more than two decades by makers of reproducing pianos to try to produce a reproducing piano that would truly record and playback the full gamut of expressiveness of the best performers at the piano. So here is the current article that I have, incorporating the recent change I made, following Makemi’s feedback. Any praise of any kind has been deleted by me (even though my praises were based on facts, on knowledge). ==The New (2006) Bösendorfer Reproducing Grand Piano: the CEUS Computer Grand Piano== Pianos That Has For goal of Accomplishing Full Expressiveness at the Keyboard== During the past recent decades, a reproducing piano (also sometimes called a computer piano or a player piano) has been defined as being first an acoustic piano that is not diminished in any way in its ability to play piano pieces. The touch at the keyboard and the sound produced by a reproducing piano is not changed in any way compared to a normal acoustic piano. However, a reproducing piano has an unobtrusive computer interface that allows the pianist to record and playback the piano pieces that are performed on it. Usually, it also has a silent mechanism that stops the hammers from striking the strings and that allows the pianist to play silently at the keyboard, at any time during the day or the night without disturbing others, and with the option of using headphones to hear digital sounds while playing silently at the keyboard (many digital sounds are available: piano, harpsichord, organ, strings, etc.). It also has a MIDI interface that allows the pianist to play back many pieces that are available on this particular MIDI format. However, the MIDI format allows the recording and playback of the velocity of the hammers of the piano only at a level of accuracy of 127 scales (or 127 steps if you prefer). The problem is that several pianistic techniques move the hammers at an incredibly high speed, making these 127 scales highly insufficient to be able to record and playback accurately the very high velocity of the hammers. The capability of a reproducing piano to convey the full expressiveness of the pianist at the keyboard is directly related to its ability to record and playback accurately the velocity of the hammers that are moved when the pianist presses the keys at the keyboard. Consequently, a reproducing piano usually also has a more accurate proprietary format to record and playback piano pieces at a much higher level of accuracy than the MIDI format. In summary, a reproducing piano is a very flexible musical instrument that combines the old (an acoustic piano) with the new (a MIDI format but especially the recording and playing back of the piano) at the same time. It allows the pianist to play the numerous MIDI piano pieces available but, more importantly, to record and playback piano pieces at a higher level of accuracy than it is possible to do with the MIDI format. The quality of the Bösendorfer pianos and especially the sound that they produce are the result of a long and old tradition of piano making. Bösendorfer also kept in touch with modernity. They took an active participation at making reproducing pianos first with their SE 290 computer piano that was made in collaboration with Wayne Stahnke. It was considered by the entire community of piano makers to be the most accurate reproducing piano of its time. At the beginning of 2006, Bösendorfer introduced its next generation of reproducing pianos: the CEUS Computer Grand Piano. Previously to the Bösendorfer CEUS Computer Grand Piano, several scientific studies were made that had for main goal to assess if the reproducing pianos that were available were as faithful to the expressiveness of the best performers at the piano as they should be. These studies concluded that the best reproducing pianos (including the SE 290 computer piano) were not as faithful at recording and playing back the performance of the best pianists as they should have been (see in particular ``Measurement and reproduction accuracy of computer-controlled grand pianos`` by Werner Goebl, et al., August 6-9, 2003). Taking this conclusion as an incentive to raise the accuracy of its reproducing piano (the SE 290 computer piano), Bösendorfer set themselves to create an even more accurate reproducing piano that would accomplish THE VERY CHALLENGING GOAL OF BEING ABLE TO RECORD AND PLAYBACK THE FULL GAMUT OF EXPRESSIVENE	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
59,088,800	` Stroke out comment by blocked vandal who posted ``in my name`` in order to throw mud on me. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
59,088,825	` ==An added remark in my article that will please Makemi a lot== To prove that I do not have any interest in praising this new CEUS computer piano, I add the following remark in my article: ``Bösendorfer has a reputation of excellence at piano making. Moreover, German-speaking countries such as Austria have a tradition of excellence at anything related to solving complex engineering tasks. And lastly, Austria is in Europe and the way products are advertised in Europe is much more honest than the way they are advertised in the USA (features of products mentioned by European companies are nearly always true contrary to what happens in the USA!). Consequently, there is no reason to doubt that the features that Bösendorfer mentions on their web site concerning this new CEUS Computer Grand Piano will prove to be true when they will be assessed by independent parties.`` ==So, here is the new, latest version of my article; it should pleased even the worst complainers and prove that I am with no agenda at all!!== The New (2006) Bösendorfer Reproducing Grand Piano: the CEUS Computer Grand Piano During the past recent decades, a reproducing piano (also sometimes called a computer piano or a player piano) has been defined as being first an acoustic piano that is not diminished in any way in its ability to play piano pieces. The touch at the keyboard and the sound produced by a reproducing piano is not changed in any way compared to a normal acoustic piano. However, a reproducing piano has an unobtrusive computer interface that allows the pianist to record and playback the piano pieces that are performed on it. Usually, it also has a silent mechanism that stops the hammers from striking the strings and that allows the pianist to play silently at the keyboard, at any time during the day or the night without disturbing others, and with the option of using headphones to hear digital sounds while playing silently at the keyboard (many digital sounds are available: piano, harpsichord, organ, strings, etc.). It also has a MIDI interface that allows the pianist to play back many pieces that are available on this particular MIDI format. The capability of a reproducing piano to convey the full expressiveness of the pianist at the keyboard is directly related to its ability to record and playback accurately the velocity of the hammers that are moved when the pianist presses the keys at the keyboard. However, the MIDI format allows the recording and playback of the velocity of the hammers of the piano only at a level of accuracy of 127 scales (or 127 steps if you prefer). The problem is that most of the pianistic techniques move the hammers at an incredibly high speed, making these 127 scales highly insufficient to be able to record and playback accurately the very high velocity of the hammers. Consequently, a reproducing piano usually also has a more accurate proprietary format to record and playback piano pieces at a much higher level of accuracy than the MIDI format. In summary, a reproducing piano is a very flexible musical instrument that combines the old (an acoustic piano) with the new (a MIDI format but especially the recording and playing back of the piano) at the same time. It allows the pianist to play the numerous MIDI piano pieces available but, more importantly, to record and playback piano pieces at a higher level of accuracy than it is possible to do with the MIDI format. The quality of the Bösendorfer pianos and especially the sound that they produce are the result of a long and old tradition of piano making. Bösendorfer also kept in touch with modernity. They took an active participation at making reproducing pianos first with their SE 290 computer piano that was made in collaboration with Wayne Stahnke. It was considered by the entire community of piano makers to be the most accurate reproducing piano of its time. At the beginning of 2006, Bösendorfer introduced its next generation of reproducing pianos: the CEUS Computer Grand Piano. Previously to the Bösendorfer CEUS Computer Grand Piano, several scientific studies were made that had for main goal to assess if the reproducing pianos that were available were as faithful to the expressiveness of the best performers at the piano as they should be. These studies concluded that the best reproducing pianos (including the SE 290 computer piano) were not as faithful at recording and playing back the performance of the best pianists as they should have been (see in particular ``Measurement and reproduction accuracy of computer-controlled grand pianos`` by Werner Goebl, et al., August 6-9, 2003). Taking this conclusion as an incentive to raise the accuracy of its reproducing piano (the SE 290 computer piano), Bösendorfer set themselves to create an even more accurate reproducing piano that would accomplish THE VERY CHALLENGING GOAL OF BEING ABLE TO RECORD AND P	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
59,089,329	Rename to US invasion of Panama as using a propaganda name invented by one side violates neutrality.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
59,089,456	As after one week we have a 4-1 majority for the name change it should be done.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
59,092,227	` {\| style=``border-spacing:8px;margin:0px -8px`` width=``100%`` \|class=``MainPageBG`` style=``width: 55%; border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top;color:#000000;font-size: 85%``\| {\| width=``100%`` cellpadding=``2`` cellspacing=``5`` style=``vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA`` ! Hello Steven s-h, and welcome to Wikipedia! Here are some recommended guidelines to help you get involved. Please feel free to contact me if you need help with anything. Best of luck and happy editing! \|} {\| style=``border-spacing:8px;margin:0px -8px`` width=``100%`` \|class=``MainPageBG`` style=``width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top``\| {\| width=``100%`` cellpadding=``2`` cellspacing=``5`` style=``vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA`` ! Getting started \|- \|style=``color:#000``\| * Wikipedia Tutorial * How to edit a page * The five pillars of Wikipedia * Manual of Style * Be bold in editing * How to write a great article * WikiProjects \|- ! Getting your info out there \|- \| style=``color:#000``\| * Cite your sources * Neutral Point of View * Point of View * Verifiability * Uploading images * Image use policy \|- ! Getting more Wikipedia rules \|- \| style=``color:#000``\| * Policy Library \|- \|} \|class=``MainPageBG`` style=``width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top``\| {\| width=``100%`` cellpadding=``2`` cellspacing=``5`` style=``vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA`` ! Getting help \|- \|style=``color:#000``\| * New contributors' help page * Where to ask a question * Help Desk * Frequently Asked Questions \|- ! Getting along \|- \|style=``color:#000``\| * Wikipedians * Wikiquette * Civility * Sign your posts * Conflict resolution \|- ! Getting technical \|- \|style=``color:#000``\| * Pages needing attention * Peer review * Utilities * Village pump \|- \|} \|} \|}`	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
59,092,537	`::I've tried to explain what I meant below. Hopefully it is clear. At the moment, I think people read across the box and think that the column is showing the remaining contenders for first place in Group A, rather than the initial contenders for 1st place in Group A. I think moving the ``1st`` bit to appear at left within the ``Round of 16`` column (after the line leading from the Group to the Last 16 place), would emphasise that it is the Last 16 place that is ``1st A`` or whatever. `	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
59,096,861	: Ravi, :First of all thank you for providing the somewhat civil tone to this discussion. I was asked to provide some help in this article and the only reference I have is Ibbetson. I can locate more, but I did consider contacting you for this article as you appear the better Jatt informed. :With regards to finding better evidence to counter this evidence, I am the wrong person to suggest that to. I merely offered some evidence from a recorded source (whatever the opinion of it is, it is still a documented reference) at someones request, it is clearly not my opinion, but an statement from a source. If you feel it is incorrect, please, by all means offer the alternative history in the article. I have no idea where they came from and only have one reference to explain this. :I would welcome ALL sources for input to project a more correct picture of their history. But I would say, origins are a very tricky and somewhat,(as you implied) hyped expedition . Trying to keep with their modern achievements from where their name was in use onwards would be much more beneficial in my opinion, with some references to possible origins etc. :Therefore, please dont wait a week on my part, I am more than happy for you to work on the article asap, it's not my exclusive page lol. Goodluck.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
59,099,343	` ::::I'm afraid that me being respectful to you is something highly unlikely to happen. About as likely as you being respectful to me, for that matter. I've had a look through policy, and I can't see any clause mandating punitive bans for talking back to one's elders and betters, so just continue with illegal bans if you want an ArbCom case. ::::In the meantime, your ban is no actual impediment to me whatsoever. — `	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
59,111,195	Let me kindly suggest that YOU, Bazzajf, need to get a life.	2,006	false	user	blocked	dev	true
59,113,582	:::I think we're in agreement that the blowjobs sub-section should be reinstated. I'll put it back now.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
59,116,055	Howdie Ed.I think the big role that the US assumes in the World, particularly it's domination relative to other countries in the UN, has the World in response having high expectations of the US. It isn't necessarily a different perspective on what constitutes moral behavior. In Islamic rules of warfare, one isn't to take a life out of anger, and this is reflected in a tradition in which Ali (Muhammad's nephew) forced himself to refrain from killing a man whom he defeated in battle, simply because he realized that anger would motivate his action. Of course, Saddam isn't much of a Muslim. For whatever reason, there's an atmosphere of chaos and apathy in many of the Arab states. Maybe it's a vacuum left after European control, who knows. It's politics, not religion. :	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
59,118,645	` == Concerts == This page should include his abilities to perform live ala the who's page and list and describe his concert segment like his piano clapping and ``Songs I heard on the radio`` and his jokes and his stage jumping. I could go on. So could a dedicated fan and well skilled wiki editor please deal with this issue. I would do it but I have only seen one of his concerts. I know wiki frowns on opinions, but he rocks.`	2,006	false	article	random	train	false
59,125,445	No, they prefer to fight in the dark, where they can hit you from safe distance.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
59,129,468	` == Bringing Up To Standards == To avoid edit warring, let's work by consensus. I think it's agreed that statements need to be cited, and that it's not enough to cite, but to reflect the source accurately. Statements that are either uncited or incorrectly cited need to be corrected, or removed. Starting from the top, there's this sentence: ``The status of dhimmi applied to millions of people living from the Atlantic Ocean to India from the 7th century until modern times [citation needed]. `` Can we agree to substute 'until modern times' with something more appropriate? I suggest something like ``from the 7th century, and is still practiced in countries such as...``. Since only a handful of countries actually apply Shariah, and only few that practice it still hold the dhimma thing, this shouldnt be a problem. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
59,131,362	`::: Simple solution. Rename the article to ``Dhimmi, according to Bat Ye'or and Bernard Lewis``. The article is overburdened with the views of a handful of orientalists. In addition to that, as Tony points out, the article is effectively a series of polemic statements deriding the historic practices that occured under the Dhimmi system. If this article isn't a commentary (and POV-driven indictment) on history, then there's the burden to prove that Shariah as practiced today also supports the kinds of restrictions on dhimma that the article claims it to. Sections discussing history should make it clear that their content is historical, and should not contrast events and policies practiced in the 8th or 10th century with standards we accept today. Sections dealing with contemporary usage of dhimma in countries that run under Shariah should make it clear what aspects of the dhimmi system are still being practiced. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
59,137,134	== Dangers of Aluminum Bats == Without citations to back up claims, it may appear that this article is biased. For instance, the article states: there is statistical evidence, if sometimes contested, of more injuries and even deaths with the metal bat. but it fails to cite any of the statistical evidence. There are also no citations to any deaths caused by using an aluminum bat, or proof that these deaths (if they exist) would not have happened if the batter had been using a wooden bat. If aluminum bats are so dangerous, and I'm not saying that they aren't, then why did the American Academy of Pediatrics not recommend using wooden bats in their own study? Instead, they suggested using softer balls and more headgear protection.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
59,146,917	== On == Assalamu Alaikum. Please don't confront Timothy. He makes it a habit of infuriating people with his allegations and POV-pushing, and then complaining to admins until he find one naive enough to act on his complaining and affect a user block. He'd done it once to you already, he's done it with me, and he's tried to do something to Faisal. He's playing games here. It's probably best to just stick to the editing, and make sure that articles relating to Islam remain NPOV, and free of their polemicism. I appreciate your help.	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
59,147,000	unless you really have to	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
59,148,006	::: Why should anything be said without reliable sources? And if keeping the can of worms closed means having this article effectively read like an indictment of shariah from the view of a handful of orientalists, opening that can of worms might not be a bad idea. If implicit dhimmi is still part of Shariah, does that include prohibiting Jews from wearing sandals as the article claims? I can't help but feel the article is deliberately vague on the distinctions between historical practices and the core rules regarding nonMuslims according to Shariah. The article merely highlights the most oppressive of actions and presumes that all the Muslim World embraces those policies.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
59,148,429	` When was the last time you got laid, ``Scientizzle?`` If ever, that is. `	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
59,151,253	== Proud to be Greek == We must mention something about the fact that we Greeks are a proud people, and we are not barbarians like some. The chant of the barbarian will be 'allahu akbar' when he invades europe.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
59,151,772	== you are right about cyprus == the north so called 'trnc' is a vandal regime, you are a good man, i call you my european brother.	2,006	false	user	blocked	test	false
59,154,103	` :::Geogre, to know what I'm ``saying``, you will have to see if Bish will loan you the code. And no, there is absolutely no relationship between the size of my edits, or the need for a magnifying glass, and Giano's manhood — none whatsoever. `	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
59,154,877	== Bot == This bot reverted changes I made to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelton_High_School_%28Connecticut%29 That page needs to be cleaned up or deleted because it does not match wikipedia standards. Please get back to me asap thanks done, in the future, please don't blank articles, just tag them with {{cleanup}}, {{stub}}, or if you must {{db\|reason}} without actually removing the content, thanks :also, AntiVandalBot is ... a bot, it can't actually talk to you	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
59,157,469	::*also part II, this is a wiki, you don't need to use a full url for an on server link, Shelton_High_School_%28Connecticut%29	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
59,159,668	I WANT TO GET JOB AT JFK DEPOT CAN YOU HELP CALL ME AT 16467739974 TINA RIVERA	2,006	false	article	blocked	test	false
59,163,207	, like where it says 'I am not Eisenhower's sockpuppet' and stuff	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false

58,866,571

== school page == for the last few says i couldnt get on the school's web page i thought it had be shut down but its up. http://www.corpus.pa.net/

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

58,867,483

:You in no way justified your deletion of my edits on the Byzantine Literature page, you simply removed the pictures as they either a) offended your atheist sensibilities or b) as some childish way of offending me. This will be reported.

2,006

false

user

blocked

test

false

58,868,487

== Stalking == you little shit you need to stop following me around wikipedia and deleting every fuckin thing i write

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

true

58,869,131

== cowboy == your quite the cowboy admin kungfuadam.

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

58,870,691

== sorry i jumped to conclusions == on christian terrorism article man, I don't agree with you, and I want you to go and listen to 'prophet of doom' (now in audio format) as it is good. But I was wrong to be so rude. It is not the Southern European way.

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

58,872,378

== Picture of Heraclius instead of Constantine XI? == We know Heraclius is credited with the formal side of hellenization, he also emphasized a greek Nationalist struggle in persian wars. I think it is therefore more suitable to put him down as the 'formal' turning point in Roman History when Roman Empire became 'Hellenized' fully. Also, maybe Nikos Kazantzakis instead of Venizelos? We need a representative of the Arts up there, he is Greece's greatest contemporary author.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

58,873,643

` Also, about controversy, the ``Axl of old`` would have flipped the crowd off and went home and WOULDN'T gone back out on stage after the crowd throwing things, shoddy work on the stage, and a poor soundbooth.`

2,006

false

article

random

test

false

58,875,517

:Nazism and religion Nazi mysticism Nazi architecture Category:Nazi physicians Nazi human experimentation Nazism and race Nazi songs Nazi mysticism etc...

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

58,875,704

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=Nazi&fulltext;=Search Nazi Search] [

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

58,881,461

== Malay and Malaysian == Hello. I've noticed that you are trying to merge Malaysian culture and Malay culture into one category. It is important to realize Malaysia and Malay are two different terms describing two different things. Malay is not necessarily Malaysian and a Malaysian is not necessarily Malay. A citizen of Malaysia is called Malaysian and not Malay. Malay is an ethnic group, not an adjective to Malaysia. I hope you could revert all your edit concerning the two categories.

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

58,886,984

A white guy rockin' the 'rows? Talk about an insult. This style is almost exclusively a style for African-Americans, and females at that. I don't see a problem w/the white guy, but not as the main picture. Changed.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

58,889,344

Asked and answered. See numerous other submissions on this 'point'.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

58,893,407

somebody should put 40 glocc down because either he is a mike knoxx or he is signed to g unit cause he says in almost every song that he is a g unit soldier.

2,006

false

article

blocked

test

false

58,893,448

` Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the Guitar page on Wikipedia! Your test worked, and thank you for reverting or removing it yourself. The best way to do tests in the future would be to use the sandbox. You can look at these pages as well: how to edit a page, the tutorial, and how to write a great article. All of these pages are good places to start. Again, thanks, and we hope that you will like Wikipedia. `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

58,893,612

==Vandalism== Hello George this is CAYA you vandalised my home page and I just wanted to tell you THANK YOU! your welcome back anytime.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

58,897,882

You do not have to acknowledge TWO urban centers, only acknowledge that Boston is no cultural or business hub for CT. Put away your pride and go back to this: The New England region of the United States is located in the northeastern corner of the country. Boston is its most populous city, and the business and cultural hub for all but the Connecticut, which is oriented toward New York City. New England is made up of the following states: It is simple and keeps your point while only changin one line instead of the whole article. What you or whoever wrote was way worse and far more complex. It made a SIMPLE change into a major problem. All because of pride in the form of New England fundamentalism.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

58,901,752

== I agree. == I agree with all this. I served as a member of the C6F staff from Dec. 1990 to Dec 1992, when the flagship was onboard the USS Belknap.

2,006

false

article

random

train

false

58,910,744

` :The fact that it is in the ``accused`` category instead of just Category:Terrorist organizations implies that the accusation was and is hotly disputed. In fact, are you suggesting that there is any accusation of terrorism that has ever not been disputed by someone or other? :Essentially, you are a Lehi supporter trying to make Lehi look as good as possible. Compare this with the situation with Al Qaeda. There, I am having a hard time keeping the article in Category:Organizations accused of terrorism, not because there is anyone wanting not to label the organization, but because everyone wants it in Category:Terrorist organizations! It's crazy. You partisans want your favourite terrorist organisations free of labels, and your enemies' organizations labelled as ``terrorist``. Since there are more Jewish and Christian people editing Wikipedia than Muslims, this means that some get the label, and others don't. :I'm afraid that this situation is not acceptable. Pro-terrorists are going to have to accept that we have an NPOV policy, and that all of these organizations will be categorised in a neutral manner. — `

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

58,911,012

:Note also that the policy does not say to avoid using the word terrorist, but to avoid describing people are terrorists. That is to say that it is fine to give quotations or note accusations by third parties.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

58,913,660

` :It would be uncivil to call you a dickhead. To note that you are pro-Lehi is simply to state the obvious. Our point is so strong that there is no way to help or weaken it. :``Almost exactly the same``? The same except that one is POV and the other is NPOV. — `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

58,914,281

`::I must apologize profusely. It is chaf that is the velar fricative (``ch`` in Scottish loch): hhet is the same sound, for non-Arab Jews, and a uvular fricative (much further back in the throat, as in Arabic) for Mizrahim. I got the two terms muddled up because my browser does not support IPA symbols properly so I couldn't make sense of the table. Please edit accordingly. `

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

58,916,520

` Mr Anonymous, First of all...the three we are discussing are at least 103 years old...would you like to tell them to their face. Second...you are wrong...the Treaty of Versailles was not signed until 1919. There was instability and the war continued in Russia, and Germany's government was in turmoil. US soldiers were needed to keep the peace. I suppose the US war in Iraq ended May 1 2003 with 'Mission Accomplished'. NOT. You simply don't understand that a war EFFORT is exactly that. Many of the so-called 'veterans' were working typewriters, driving delivery trucks, etc. These three could have seen more action than that...such as Julio Ereneta, picking up mines. Since the peace treaty wasn't signed until 1919, it is arguable that the war ended in 1919. At the very least, these men were recruited to replace those sent to war...if there had been no WWI, they would likely have never joined. Moreoever, we see veterans like Moses Hardy, recruited in 1918, returned to the US in 1919. In fact most WWI veterans did NOT return in 1918, they returned in 1919. Finally, this list is intended to include possible WWI veterans; did we really verify the Polish claims? We can throw out a case like Merlyn Kreuger because, one, he is 89 not 103 and two, he never served at Fort Dix as he claimed. These three, however, DID serve, and were called on to serve by the US gov't due to WWI. Thus, at least SOME people would include them as WWI veterans. It's not for you alone to decide. I think a disclaimer is already balancing it out.→ {ł} `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

58,917,644

Mrs. Trellis which I am certain is a sockpuppet has a lot of time on his hands it seems. The survey is obviously one of a fraudulent nature. Why? Because I am certain if it were a bonafide survey, then at least one if not several more of the respondents would of replied that Wales is the land of RUGBY but as Mrs. Trellis may have little or no interest in sport, he failed to include this as a response in his self-serving survey.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

58,918,165

` ::``Wales is popularly known as ``the land of song``, and is known as the home of many musicians and musical styles``. This is a contention. This is not a fact, all countries have some semblance of musical culture and heritage, in my view Wales cannot be differentiated from these countries on this basis. In other words, I would not pick Wales out as being known as the home of many musicians and musical styles above any other country, the citations offered do not qualify this contention. Please remove it. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

58,925,513

== I am not an anti-semite == Enough said. Stop trying to smear me as one. I request a full apology from your for your blatantly false and hurtful accusation. You may contact me via Special:Emailuser/Blu Aardvark. | | (contribs)

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

58,929,341

Hey, I know with the Estatut coming up your nationalist fervor is buzzing. Please find somewhere else to express it. If you don't like Majorcans, Valencians, basques, Catalans, Andalusians or Gallegos being Spanish it is your own problem. Majorcans are Spanish and they want to be Spanish. You cannot force them to be anything else.

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

58,931,364

` == Block/unblock == Frankly, I can't be bothered reading the whole post on ANI. FWIW, I have always felt that this user was redeemable. I think the question is, 'does he wish redemption'. I invite Blu to post here, indicating what behaviour we can expect if he is unbanned. Then perhaps we'd have more to go on. I have unblocked this user (as one of the two primary ``victims`` of his personal attacks, I feel this is my right). I agree with Doc that I feel he is redeamable. He has agreed to be on his best behavior, and that's good enough for me. :Have you discussed this action with the other involved parties? - ==Workshop== Is this edit you, and do you want it readded? Can't help with the block problem, unless you want me to post on AN or someone else's talk page but {{unblock}} would accomplish the same, mostly. :Yeah, that was me. Thought I was logged in. Go ahead and re-add it. | | (contribs) == Suggestion == {Discussion with Malber archived to history} {Further trolling removed} I added the deleted sections to your archive 2 assuming you would do this yourself if not blocked. No need to reply unless you strongly object to this action. :Thanks. I appreciate it. (By which I mean, it's exactly what I would have done) | | (contribs) `

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

58,932,037

` == ? == Hi. We never interacted before, but you've generated a lot of attention lately. Just so I can understand a little better why you've come back, could you comment on the following posting of yours on Wikipedia Review? :Whether banned or not, I have no intention of legitimately contributing to their ``encyclopedia`` ever again... not after the way I have been treated, at least. :Oh, I may eventually come back, as a sockpuppet, and make some legit edits, but I honestly do not plan to. The ones in charge of the place are disruptive, abusive, and just flat-out rude, and I have no desire to be a part of that. Have things changed since then? Thanks, — ::To an extent, yes. I've worked out or gotten over my disputes with mosts of the people I have had conflict with. The others, I feel I can avoid. | | (contribs) :Thanks for your response. I think it's going to prove quite difficult to avoid some people here, but I wish you good luck. — `

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

58,933,302

`::::Wusses. Binary or nothing... `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

58,938,361

==IK ZAL DE HOND BESSEL DEKKER MUILBANDEN==

2,006

false

user

blocked

dev

false

58,944,740

That last line (the new version is better) is YPOV. This 'new'(your) version just complicates the issue and makes the article less simple to read. Tell me, why MUST Boston be mentioned as a cultural and business hub at all? This seems to be at the heart of your bias. It appears as you want the viewers to get from reading it that Boston is somehow the nerve center and city that New England revolves around and looks up to. Why MUST this illusion be on the page?

2,006

false

article

blocked

test

false

58,945,656

Well actually that helps out my (clearly won and clearly proven, but dismissed in favor of bias) argument since the other parts of CT are not counted as Boston, so it is not hub for ANY part of CT. Also, somone erased this, but I also pointed out that the link includes Torrington, CT which is up by Mass! So now that this issue has been PROVEN 50x over compared to NO PROOF from these editors, to show that you people are neutral(!), now is the time to change that article for truth sake and not because you wish that people see things(lies) the way that you want them to see it. If you read the NY Times, would you want to read lies? Would you want them to just make up stories or have articles read with bias towards an author's opinion? This is what clearly goes on on Wikipedia. Too bad most people think that this is a real and valid source of 'true' information.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

58,951,061

Greco Romanism did not begin in 146AD, with the Roman occupation of Greece, I find it exceedingly annoying that I need to give examples of Roman poetry, literature, sculpture, architecture and theatre, (which before the 1st century AD was simply copy of Greek) and so on influenced by Greece, these are obvious to anyone with even basic understanding of classical history.

2,006

false

article

blocked

test

false

58,966,195

>I often use NJ as an example in my arguements on this issue. The ony difference with NJ is that Philly is right next to NJ as opposed to Boston not being any where near CT. On NYC news, NJ seems to be talked about more than even NYC. I find that weird, but what can you do? This Wikipedia is clearly bias and these people clearly don't want to do anything but put their opinions as assumed fact on here so I will resort to terro tactics, if not shutting this site down.

2,006

false

article

blocked

dev

false

58,966,218

Right on may 26, 1863 which is not the stars and bars ( )

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

58,966,276

` Tuf-Kat, I'm tired. I do not care at all. None cares of these underground genres. Old Electronic music and New Age fans do not need and do not use Wikipedia as primary source. New ``electronic music`` fans, simply ignore or really can't understand differences and proper analogies between genres. So, ther is no point to fill this gap. Though there are thousands people sharing my ``point of view``, there is no way to involve them in a ``battle`` against younger Wikiusers. Feel free to do what you want. Wikipedia is only a stupid game, I'm no longer interested in contributing on these topics. Usually, users that remove dispute templates are immediately banned, but these harrassers aren't yet. Maybe Wikipedia is theirs and none else has to touch their toy. Enjoy it. I'll not post anything else on music genres. Bye. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

true

58,966,873

>That is what I have asked the dude to do - take out the cities, but he INSISTS upon keeping Boston(as the center of the world. Clearly biased) in no matter what. These bastrards on Wikipedia do not know how to compromise or neogotiate. All they know is how they see things or how they want others to see things.

2,006

false

article

blocked

dev

true

58,967,415

>Boston not near CT. Do you have to have Phd to figure this out? Again, Boston is no busniess or cultural HUB for CT. As far as business is concerned, even Hartford might disagree. Besides, CT is in the NY region and we know that NYC is the #1 business and cultural hub for America.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

58,968,255

When the fuck are you goona change the New England article to fit facts? Boston is no business or cultural hub for CT, period!!!!

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

true

58,971,086

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

58,971,190

::Since its rated teen, pg-13 is appropriate.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

58,977,240

No thanks, I hate Microsoft and any of their products, I believe in free software/open source and freedom. Long live the US Constitution & Bill of Rights.

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

58,978,422

What are you talking about? What edit wars? I'm not allowed to edit my own profile?

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

58,979,004

== I WONDER IF.... == As per your comment that a pic of Mohammed would 'offend' Muslims, I wonder if you'd extend the same courtesy to Christians or Jews? I doubt it somehow, Atheists tend to be totally one sided in their love of Islam and hatred of Christianity.

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

58,984,894

` With regard to your last posting at my talk page, I'm tired. I do not care at all. None cares of these underground genres. ``Old Electronic music`` and ``New Age`` fans do not need and do not use Wikipedia as primary source. New ``electronic music`` fans, simply ignore or really can't understand differences and proper analogies between genres. So, there is no point to fill this gap. Though there are thousands people sharing my ``point of view``, there is no way to involve them in a ``battle`` against younger Wikiusers. Feel free to do what you want. Wikipedia is only a stupid game, I'm no longer interested in contributing on these topics. Usually, users that remove dispute templates are immediately banned, but these harrassers aren't yet. Maybe Wikipedia is theirs and none else has to touch their toy. Enjoy it. I'll no longer contribute on music genres. Bye. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

58,990,773

:As I said, that is your POV. Matiur Rahman wanted freedom for his own nation. By the way, the plane Rahman hijacked was as much East Pakistan's as was West's, and most likely it was bought with the large revenue earned from East Pakistan, since EP earned the majority of export earnings anyway.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

58,993,250

== uhhh == Taco bell is on me is a slogan where I come from, you Deuchebag Mcgee. Do your research.

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

58,994,378

== Ron == The How Smart is Ron has been moved to the talk page. =D

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

58,994,481

:Most people are distracted by the falsely planted rumors about Martians and Venusians, so they are unaware of the true Blugztrakhian threat.

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

59,006,376

: or just some hyperactive GameFAQ fanboy, but yeah, this entire article is pretty terrible. I'd suggest marking it for cleanup, not pov.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

59,010,250

` :You are accusing me of slapping labels on. You are making a comment on my civility. Comment on content alone, not other editors. — `

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

59,010,911

` :::I was telling him and warning him. Now, you treat me with respect or you may have problems. — `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

59,011,501

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!) Here are a few links you might find helpful: *Be Bold! *Don't let grumpy users scare you off. *Meet other new users *Learn from others *Play nicely with others *Contribute, Contribute, Contribute! *Tell us about you You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on . Or, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. We're so glad you're here!

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

59,012,786

` :::::This is your last warning, fine Wikipedian. Stop your threats and trolling immediately. — `

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

59,014,576

` ::Interesting. I think I'll keep this thread now. It's a very clear example of admin abuse. Because I didn't take your crap on my talk page, you personally blocked my account to spite me! That's pretty amazing. I mean, you can't possibly justify it based on the fact that I pointed out that another editor was a supporter of Lehi. I notice that you have a history of throwing around disputed accusations of ``incivility``. ::Review your own comments on this page. They are a series of taunts and threats. Each time, I failed to rise to the challenge and point out what of person you are. I didn't irritate you with a big orange bar by taking it to your talk page. ::Anyway, there is no point talking to you. You were losing a debate and so restricted your opponent's ability to act and reply. Shows how strong your argument is. — `

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

59,016,216

` ::Hi Chris. Thanks for your note. The reason that the article was tagged for speedy deletion by another editor, and the reason that I deleted it was that it did not ``assert the importance or significance of its subject``. As you correctly state, non-notability is not a valid criteria for speedy deletion; but the absence of a reason why the subject could be notable is. This criteria is describe in more detail in Wikipedia:Deletion of vanity articles. I don't have a strong objection to recreating this article, and I wouldn't try to stand in the way of you doing so yourself - but I think that if it is just recreated in its old format, it may quickly get tagged and deleted again. Can I suggest that you recreate it but add something that rectifies the issue described above? To make this easier I have copied the deleted contents . Cheers `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

59,021,277

` ==Orphaned fair use image (:Image:DanieleSuzuki.jpg)== {| align=``CENTER`` style=``background-color:#FFFFFF; border:8px solid #FF0000; padding:5px;`` |- | | This media may be deleted. |} Thanks for uploading Image:DanieleSuzuki.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that your image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If your image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why your image was deleted. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ```` link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ``Image`` from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

59,027,933

Norwich disagrees, he writes in volume 1 of his history of byzantium (the early centuries), that Byzantium was somewhat more stable than European states. The western europeans have always hated the Greek (except the philhellenes), and in an effort to surpass him they try to attribute that pure latin side of the greco-roman history as their own.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

59,027,989

: To answer the question (as Timothy and Mantanmoreland won't), it's sarcasm. He's clearly what would be considered unwelcome to any gathering of Muslims, given the hate speech he makes use of. . I would suggest every effort be taken to keep people like this off Wikipedia. And Mantanmoreland, had what FairNBalanced said and did been directed at Jews or Christians instead of women, he'd be permenantly banned. He got the least of what he deserved, so spare us the 'poor chap' song.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

59,028,142

== You're a motherfucking prick! == So, you don't agree with my comments on alcohol, huh? Well, I don't know where you live (if I did, you'd be dead by now), but you fail at life for supporting alcohol. Go kill yourself, you asshole!

2,006

false

user

blocked

dev

true

59,032,823

:: Mantanmoreland, please read WP:AGF. You cannot know for certain what Irishpunktom's motivations are, much less tell if that particularly violent euphamism is an appropriate one. WP:AGF asks us to assume Irishpunktom's motives are honorable, unless there's evidence to prove otherwise. We should assume the question is a reasonable one.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

59,033,196

Yes, I was blocked for losing patience with you, and what I did then would constitute personal attack. Honest outspoken criticism that is based on fact is permitted though, and the shameless hate speech expressed here deserves more than just vocal criticism. As for you, I'll discuss you elsewhere. This isn't the place for that.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

59,037,325

::: If those phrases are of such significance and popularity, they should be here as well. Zeq, I know WP:NOT, my point was that the article should be a factual account of the use of the phrase. On both sides of the issue, there's alot to be said. The phrase 'aparthied wall' and 'israeli aparthied' is as popular amongst some people as 'war on terror' might be here in the US. It's significant, it's present in public discourse, it should have an article about it here.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

59,040,970

::::::::::::::EXACTLY my point, my friend! Unsourced images should be removed, not selectively removed. These fangirls were only removing the unsourced images which depicted Benson with a boyfriend, and instead posting equally sourced images of her alone. I removed the other unsourced imagery, thank you very much!

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

59,043,880

. I myself have seen the little creatures and I'm sad to see serious, lifesaving, articles been reverted

2,006

false

article

random

train

false

59,047,333

`This is very tiresome, and a typical example of Wikipedia competitive uber-pedantry. There is only one spelling of ``strasse`` - s-t-r-a-s-s-e. This is not a matter of spelling, it is solely a question of how letters are written. The use of ``β`` for ``ss`` is a German orthographic convention, not a different spelling. It is not a convention used outside Germany and Austria, and is not recognised by the great majority of English-readers. They will read it as ``strabe.`` Using it is an insult to readers and is just a form of showing off by Wikipedia editors. Arguing for the use of ``β`` in the English Wikipedia on the grounds that ``they write it that way in Germany`` is the same as arguing that Beijing ought to be written ``北京`` because they write it that way in China. Or perhaps we ought to write all German placenames in Gothic script? `

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

59,053,219

== Leave u alone == then stop following me around and deleting every thing i type ( )

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

59,078,747

` == The NB notice at the top == Can't this be eliminated by simply turning the ``USC Trojans`` page into a disambiguation page rather than redirecting here? That note is trying to do the job of a diambiguation page but it's only cluttering things up. Someone with more experience help me here. `

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

59,079,945

:Here we are!!! I was waiting for this kind of xxx comment (xxx is to spare the appropriate word to qualify SupaStarGirl's comment!!). :The articles on Wikipedia do not belong anymore to anybody once they are posted!!! It means that anybody can come and modify these articles at will, irrespective of the original persons who posted them. So, your remark SupaStarGirl is not a remark from a Star at Wikipedia I could say!!! MichaelIsGreat ==Anymore comments before I close the discussion on this article? And move on with my life (that is not fpcused on wasting it trying to write a PERFECT article (!!!)== Once the discussion is over, I will republish the article with the changes I made and we will all have to leave in peace this article if those among you who censored my useful contribution are capable of such a normal behaviour (I very much doubt it!). MichaelIsGreat

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

59,081,328

:Here we are!!! I was waiting for this kind of xxx comment (xxx is to spare the appropriate word to qualify SupaStarGirl's comment!!). :The articles on Wikipedia do not belong anymore to anybody once they are posted!!! It means that anybody can come and modify these articles at will, irrespective of the original persons who posted them. So, your remark SupaStarGirl is not a remark from a Star at Wikipedia I could say!!! :MichaelIsGreat ==Anymore comments before I close the discussion on this article? And move on with my life (that is not fpcused on wasting it trying to write a PERFECT article (!!!)== Once the discussion is over, I will republish the article with the changes I made and we will all have to leave in peace this article if those among you who censored my useful contribution are capable of such a normal behaviour (I very much doubt it!). MichaelIsGreat ==I ask Tawker to avoid censoring the discussion area by reverting to the previous posting when I made changes. I clearly mentioned the changes I made, openly and there is no justified reasons to revert to the previous posting made on the discussion== Are you now going to censor even the discussion? If I decide to delete what are perceived as personal attacks, it is my right to do so without having someone like Tawker censor this change and revert to the previous posting. Is it clear, Tawker? I would not be very proud of behaving the way you have done. I could qualify your behaviour but I will leave it as it is for the time being. I have very little tolerance for your shameful behaviour, Tawker. Do you get the message? MichaelIsGreat

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

59,081,902

:I am simply supporting the consensus, which is to only include nations of the British Isles. As a matter of fact, I think the Germans are a lot closer to us than the French, but someone else has been trying to argue the opposite and at the same time push all sorts of medievalist, aristocratic fantasies.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

59,082,261

I've again removed your speculative statements about Sopranos characters. Please talk with me if there is a reason you feel it is important this is included in the article. If you find a reference from a reputable source that agrees with your speculation then it should be included, otherwise it is inappropriate. Also the article List of characters from The Sopranos in the DiMeo Crime Family is divided into subsections and the characters are alphabetised within these subsections. You have moved Ercoli DiMeo to the top of the article more than once. I will hazard a guess that your reasoning is that he has the highest rank. However, the article is not organised by rank. To reiterate it is alphabetical as per the wikipedia style guide. Please refrain from moving things out of alphabetical order as it only creates more work for other editors.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

59,082,349

` ==On Makemi’s previous comment== Makemi said ``I'm not clear on how this is revolutionary, it seems like a bigger/faster/louder computer piano.`` I deleted the remark on the CEUS being a milestone. I even deleted anything that could be judged as being a praise. Despite the fact that even the praises I made were based on facts, on the quest that has been going on for more than two decades by makers of reproducing pianos to try to produce a reproducing piano that would truly record and playback the full gamut of expressiveness of the best performers at the piano. So here is the current article that I have, incorporating the recent change I made, following Makemi’s feedback. Any praise of any kind has been deleted by me (even though my praises were based on facts, on knowledge). ==The New (2006) Bösendorfer Reproducing Grand Piano: the CEUS Computer Grand Piano== Pianos That Has For goal of Accomplishing Full Expressiveness at the Keyboard== During the past recent decades, a reproducing piano (also sometimes called a computer piano or a player piano) has been defined as being first an acoustic piano that is not diminished in any way in its ability to play piano pieces. The touch at the keyboard and the sound produced by a reproducing piano is not changed in any way compared to a normal acoustic piano. However, a reproducing piano has an unobtrusive computer interface that allows the pianist to record and playback the piano pieces that are performed on it. Usually, it also has a silent mechanism that stops the hammers from striking the strings and that allows the pianist to play silently at the keyboard, at any time during the day or the night without disturbing others, and with the option of using headphones to hear digital sounds while playing silently at the keyboard (many digital sounds are available: piano, harpsichord, organ, strings, etc.). It also has a MIDI interface that allows the pianist to play back many pieces that are available on this particular MIDI format. However, the MIDI format allows the recording and playback of the velocity of the hammers of the piano only at a level of accuracy of 127 scales (or 127 steps if you prefer). The problem is that several pianistic techniques move the hammers at an incredibly high speed, making these 127 scales highly insufficient to be able to record and playback accurately the very high velocity of the hammers. The capability of a reproducing piano to convey the full expressiveness of the pianist at the keyboard is directly related to its ability to record and playback accurately the velocity of the hammers that are moved when the pianist presses the keys at the keyboard. Consequently, a reproducing piano usually also has a more accurate proprietary format to record and playback piano pieces at a much higher level of accuracy than the MIDI format. In summary, a reproducing piano is a very flexible musical instrument that combines the old (an acoustic piano) with the new (a MIDI format but especially the recording and playing back of the piano) at the same time. It allows the pianist to play the numerous MIDI piano pieces available but, more importantly, to record and playback piano pieces at a higher level of accuracy than it is possible to do with the MIDI format. The quality of the Bösendorfer pianos and especially the sound that they produce are the result of a long and old tradition of piano making. Bösendorfer also kept in touch with modernity. They took an active participation at making reproducing pianos first with their SE 290 computer piano that was made in collaboration with Wayne Stahnke. It was considered by the entire community of piano makers to be the most accurate reproducing piano of its time. At the beginning of 2006, Bösendorfer introduced its next generation of reproducing pianos: the CEUS Computer Grand Piano. Previously to the Bösendorfer CEUS Computer Grand Piano, several scientific studies were made that had for main goal to assess if the reproducing pianos that were available were as faithful to the expressiveness of the best performers at the piano as they should be. These studies concluded that the best reproducing pianos (including the SE 290 computer piano) were not as faithful at recording and playing back the performance of the best pianists as they should have been (see in particular ``Measurement and reproduction accuracy of computer-controlled grand pianos`` by Werner Goebl, et al., August 6-9, 2003). Taking this conclusion as an incentive to raise the accuracy of its reproducing piano (the SE 290 computer piano), Bösendorfer set themselves to create an even more accurate reproducing piano that would accomplish THE VERY CHALLENGING GOAL OF BEING ABLE TO RECORD AND PLAYBACK THE FULL GAMUT OF EXPRESSIVENE

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

59,088,800

` Stroke out comment by blocked vandal who posted ``in my name`` in order to throw mud on me. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

59,088,825

` ==An added remark in my article that will please Makemi a lot== To prove that I do not have any interest in praising this new CEUS computer piano, I add the following remark in my article: ``Bösendorfer has a reputation of excellence at piano making. Moreover, German-speaking countries such as Austria have a tradition of excellence at anything related to solving complex engineering tasks. And lastly, Austria is in Europe and the way products are advertised in Europe is much more honest than the way they are advertised in the USA (features of products mentioned by European companies are nearly always true contrary to what happens in the USA!). Consequently, there is no reason to doubt that the features that Bösendorfer mentions on their web site concerning this new CEUS Computer Grand Piano will prove to be true when they will be assessed by independent parties.`` ==So, here is the new, latest version of my article; it should pleased even the worst complainers and prove that I am with no agenda at all!!== The New (2006) Bösendorfer Reproducing Grand Piano: the CEUS Computer Grand Piano During the past recent decades, a reproducing piano (also sometimes called a computer piano or a player piano) has been defined as being first an acoustic piano that is not diminished in any way in its ability to play piano pieces. The touch at the keyboard and the sound produced by a reproducing piano is not changed in any way compared to a normal acoustic piano. However, a reproducing piano has an unobtrusive computer interface that allows the pianist to record and playback the piano pieces that are performed on it. Usually, it also has a silent mechanism that stops the hammers from striking the strings and that allows the pianist to play silently at the keyboard, at any time during the day or the night without disturbing others, and with the option of using headphones to hear digital sounds while playing silently at the keyboard (many digital sounds are available: piano, harpsichord, organ, strings, etc.). It also has a MIDI interface that allows the pianist to play back many pieces that are available on this particular MIDI format. The capability of a reproducing piano to convey the full expressiveness of the pianist at the keyboard is directly related to its ability to record and playback accurately the velocity of the hammers that are moved when the pianist presses the keys at the keyboard. However, the MIDI format allows the recording and playback of the velocity of the hammers of the piano only at a level of accuracy of 127 scales (or 127 steps if you prefer). The problem is that most of the pianistic techniques move the hammers at an incredibly high speed, making these 127 scales highly insufficient to be able to record and playback accurately the very high velocity of the hammers. Consequently, a reproducing piano usually also has a more accurate proprietary format to record and playback piano pieces at a much higher level of accuracy than the MIDI format. In summary, a reproducing piano is a very flexible musical instrument that combines the old (an acoustic piano) with the new (a MIDI format but especially the recording and playing back of the piano) at the same time. It allows the pianist to play the numerous MIDI piano pieces available but, more importantly, to record and playback piano pieces at a higher level of accuracy than it is possible to do with the MIDI format. The quality of the Bösendorfer pianos and especially the sound that they produce are the result of a long and old tradition of piano making. Bösendorfer also kept in touch with modernity. They took an active participation at making reproducing pianos first with their SE 290 computer piano that was made in collaboration with Wayne Stahnke. It was considered by the entire community of piano makers to be the most accurate reproducing piano of its time. At the beginning of 2006, Bösendorfer introduced its next generation of reproducing pianos: the CEUS Computer Grand Piano. Previously to the Bösendorfer CEUS Computer Grand Piano, several scientific studies were made that had for main goal to assess if the reproducing pianos that were available were as faithful to the expressiveness of the best performers at the piano as they should be. These studies concluded that the best reproducing pianos (including the SE 290 computer piano) were not as faithful at recording and playing back the performance of the best pianists as they should have been (see in particular ``Measurement and reproduction accuracy of computer-controlled grand pianos`` by Werner Goebl, et al., August 6-9, 2003). Taking this conclusion as an incentive to raise the accuracy of its reproducing piano (the SE 290 computer piano), Bösendorfer set themselves to create an even more accurate reproducing piano that would accomplish THE VERY CHALLENGING GOAL OF BEING ABLE TO RECORD AND P

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

59,089,329

Rename to US invasion of Panama as using a propaganda name invented by one side violates neutrality.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

59,089,456

As after one week we have a 4-1 majority for the name change it should be done.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

59,092,227

` {| style=``border-spacing:8px;margin:0px -8px`` width=``100%`` |class=``MainPageBG`` style=``width: 55%; border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top;color:#000000;font-size: 85%``| {| width=``100%`` cellpadding=``2`` cellspacing=``5`` style=``vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA`` ! Hello Steven s-h, and welcome to Wikipedia! Here are some recommended guidelines to help you get involved. Please feel free to contact me if you need help with anything. Best of luck and happy editing! |} {| style=``border-spacing:8px;margin:0px -8px`` width=``100%`` |class=``MainPageBG`` style=``width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top``| {| width=``100%`` cellpadding=``2`` cellspacing=``5`` style=``vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA`` ! Getting started |- |style=``color:#000``| * Wikipedia Tutorial * How to edit a page * The five pillars of Wikipedia * Manual of Style * Be bold in editing * How to write a great article * WikiProjects |- ! Getting your info out there |- | style=``color:#000``| * Cite your sources * Neutral Point of View * Point of View * Verifiability * Uploading images * Image use policy |- ! Getting more Wikipedia rules |- | style=``color:#000``| * Policy Library |- |} |class=``MainPageBG`` style=``width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top``| {| width=``100%`` cellpadding=``2`` cellspacing=``5`` style=``vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA`` ! Getting help |- |style=``color:#000``| * New contributors' help page * Where to ask a question * Help Desk * Frequently Asked Questions |- ! Getting along |- |style=``color:#000``| * Wikipedians * Wikiquette * Civility * Sign your posts * Conflict resolution |- ! Getting technical |- |style=``color:#000``| * Pages needing attention * Peer review * Utilities * Village pump |- |} |} |}`

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

59,092,537

`::I've tried to explain what I meant below. Hopefully it is clear. At the moment, I think people read across the box and think that the column is showing the remaining contenders for first place in Group A, rather than the initial contenders for 1st place in Group A. I think moving the ``1st`` bit to appear at left within the ``Round of 16`` column (after the line leading from the Group to the Last 16 place), would emphasise that it is the Last 16 place that is ``1st A`` or whatever. `

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

59,096,861

: Ravi, :First of all thank you for providing the somewhat civil tone to this discussion. I was asked to provide some help in this article and the only reference I have is Ibbetson. I can locate more, but I did consider contacting you for this article as you appear the better Jatt informed. :With regards to finding better evidence to counter this evidence, I am the wrong person to suggest that to. I merely offered some evidence from a recorded source (whatever the opinion of it is, it is still a documented reference) at someones request, it is clearly not my opinion, but an statement from a source. If you feel it is incorrect, please, by all means offer the alternative history in the article. I have no idea where they came from and only have one reference to explain this. :I would welcome ALL sources for input to project a more correct picture of their history. But I would say, origins are a very tricky and somewhat,(as you implied) hyped expedition . Trying to keep with their modern achievements from where their name was in use onwards would be much more beneficial in my opinion, with some references to possible origins etc. :Therefore, please dont wait a week on my part, I am more than happy for you to work on the article asap, it's not my exclusive page lol. Goodluck.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

59,099,343

` ::::I'm afraid that me being respectful to you is something highly unlikely to happen. About as likely as you being respectful to me, for that matter. I've had a look through policy, and I can't see any clause mandating punitive bans for talking back to one's elders and betters, so just continue with illegal bans if you want an ArbCom case. ::::In the meantime, your ban is no actual impediment to me whatsoever. — `

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

59,111,195

Let me kindly suggest that YOU, Bazzajf, need to get a life.

2,006

false

user

blocked

dev

true

59,113,582

:::I think we're in agreement that the blowjobs sub-section should be reinstated. I'll put it back now.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

59,116,055

Howdie Ed.I think the big role that the US assumes in the World, particularly it's domination relative to other countries in the UN, has the World in response having high expectations of the US. It isn't necessarily a different perspective on what constitutes moral behavior. In Islamic rules of warfare, one isn't to take a life out of anger, and this is reflected in a tradition in which Ali (Muhammad's nephew) forced himself to refrain from killing a man whom he defeated in battle, simply because he realized that anger would motivate his action. Of course, Saddam isn't much of a Muslim. For whatever reason, there's an atmosphere of chaos and apathy in many of the Arab states. Maybe it's a vacuum left after European control, who knows. It's politics, not religion. :

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

59,118,645

` == Concerts == This page should include his abilities to perform live ala the who's page and list and describe his concert segment like his piano clapping and ``Songs I heard on the radio`` and his jokes and his stage jumping. I could go on. So could a dedicated fan and well skilled wiki editor please deal with this issue. I would do it but I have only seen one of his concerts. I know wiki frowns on opinions, but he rocks.`

2,006

false

article

random

train

false

59,125,445

No, they prefer to fight in the dark, where they can hit you from safe distance.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

59,129,468

` == Bringing Up To Standards == To avoid edit warring, let's work by consensus. I think it's agreed that statements need to be cited, and that it's not enough to cite, but to reflect the source accurately. Statements that are either uncited or incorrectly cited need to be corrected, or removed. Starting from the top, there's this sentence: ``The status of dhimmi applied to millions of people living from the Atlantic Ocean to India from the 7th century until modern times [citation needed]. `` Can we agree to substute 'until modern times' with something more appropriate? I suggest something like ``from the 7th century, and is still practiced in countries such as...``. Since only a handful of countries actually apply Shariah, and only few that practice it still hold the dhimma thing, this shouldnt be a problem. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

59,131,362

`::: Simple solution. Rename the article to ``Dhimmi, according to Bat Ye'or and Bernard Lewis``. The article is overburdened with the views of a handful of orientalists. In addition to that, as Tony points out, the article is effectively a series of polemic statements deriding the historic practices that occured under the Dhimmi system. If this article isn't a commentary (and POV-driven indictment) on history, then there's the burden to prove that Shariah as practiced today also supports the kinds of restrictions on dhimma that the article claims it to. Sections discussing history should make it clear that their content is historical, and should not contrast events and policies practiced in the 8th or 10th century with standards we accept today. Sections dealing with contemporary usage of dhimma in countries that run under Shariah should make it clear what aspects of the dhimmi system are still being practiced. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

59,137,134

== Dangers of Aluminum Bats == Without citations to back up claims, it may appear that this article is biased. For instance, the article states: there is statistical evidence, if sometimes contested, of more injuries and even deaths with the metal bat. but it fails to cite any of the statistical evidence. There are also no citations to any deaths caused by using an aluminum bat, or proof that these deaths (if they exist) would not have happened if the batter had been using a wooden bat. If aluminum bats are so dangerous, and I'm not saying that they aren't, then why did the American Academy of Pediatrics not recommend using wooden bats in their own study? Instead, they suggested using softer balls and more headgear protection.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

59,146,917

== On == Assalamu Alaikum. Please don't confront Timothy. He makes it a habit of infuriating people with his allegations and POV-pushing, and then complaining to admins until he find one naive enough to act on his complaining and affect a user block. He'd done it once to you already, he's done it with me, and he's tried to do something to Faisal. He's playing games here. It's probably best to just stick to the editing, and make sure that articles relating to Islam remain NPOV, and free of their polemicism. I appreciate your help.

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

59,147,000

unless you really have to

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

59,148,006

::: Why should anything be said without reliable sources? And if keeping the can of worms closed means having this article effectively read like an indictment of shariah from the view of a handful of orientalists, opening that can of worms might not be a bad idea. If implicit dhimmi is still part of Shariah, does that include prohibiting Jews from wearing sandals as the article claims? I can't help but feel the article is deliberately vague on the distinctions between historical practices and the core rules regarding nonMuslims according to Shariah. The article merely highlights the most oppressive of actions and presumes that all the Muslim World embraces those policies.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

59,148,429

` When was the last time you got laid, ``Scientizzle?`` If ever, that is. `

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

59,151,253

== Proud to be Greek == We must mention something about the fact that we Greeks are a proud people, and we are not barbarians like some. The chant of the barbarian will be 'allahu akbar' when he invades europe.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

59,151,772

== you are right about cyprus == the north so called 'trnc' is a vandal regime, you are a good man, i call you my european brother.

2,006

false

user

blocked

test

false

59,154,103

` :::Geogre, to know what I'm ``saying``, you will have to see if Bish will loan you the code. And no, there is absolutely no relationship between the size of my edits, or the need for a magnifying glass, and Giano's manhood — none whatsoever. `

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

59,154,877

== Bot == This bot reverted changes I made to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelton_High_School_%28Connecticut%29 That page needs to be cleaned up or deleted because it does not match wikipedia standards. Please get back to me asap thanks *done, in the future, please don't blank articles, just tag them with {{cleanup}}, {{stub}}, or if you must {{db|reason}} without actually removing the content, thanks :*also, AntiVandalBot is ... a bot, it can't actually talk to you

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

59,157,469

::*also part II, this is a wiki, you don't need to use a full url for an on server link, Shelton_High_School_%28Connecticut%29

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

59,159,668

I WANT TO GET JOB AT JFK DEPOT CAN YOU HELP CALL ME AT 16467739974 TINA RIVERA

2,006

false

article

blocked

test

false

59,163,207

, like where it says 'I am not Eisenhower's sockpuppet' and stuff

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false