dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
59,852,847	` That scandal almost led to the Cardinal having to resign in 2003, and he had to appear on ``Newsnight`` to apologize for his ``stupid`` handling of the case. The article has to mention it because it has been a defining issue of his time as Archbishop of Westminster - many Catholics in England believe he now operates under a doubtful moral authority.`	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
59,855,575	Not only is your block unwarranted, but you have blatantly violated the 3RR policy on the global warming article. It's you who is the one that should be blocked.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
59,855,583	== Neil Diamond == Is Dustin Diamond related to the singer/songwriter Neil Diamond? - 21 June 2006 01:44 pm	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
59,856,561	== Was was the show canceled? == I watched the show and I just want to know why this ok show was canceled?	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
59,857,359	:::You're not assuming good faith. I read the article the day the movie came out, so I was unaware of the correction. I read the article in its original form which thoroughly bashed the movie. Furthermore, my statements about Michael Chrichton were very accurate. I also put this in the alternative theories section since this is the minority view. But something being a minority view doesn't make it an incorrect view or vandalism. If you disagree with me, you can reword my blurb to your liking, but to call it vandalism is petty.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
59,858,493	:::The links backing up my comments: , , , and .	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
59,866,020	` Read: * Cheney, Margaret, ``Tesla: Man Out of Time``, ISBN 0-13-906859-7 * Seifer, Marc J., ``Wizard, the Life and Times of Nikola Tesla``. ISBN 1-559723-29-7 (HC), ISBN 0-806519-60-6 (SC) * O'Neill, John H., ``Prodigal Genius``. ISBN 0-914732-33-1 These should contain the references that you need. This page also give a tast of the news reports about it. Edison and Tesla Win Nobel Prize in Physics. Literary Digest, December 18, 1915. There isn't anything ``fan-like`` about this. It's statements of fact. `	2,006	false	article	random	dev	false
59,872,256	is western hemisphere also Germany? Because we got at least 6 egyptology departments! kind regards GoJoe	2,006	false	article	blocked	dev	false
59,872,488	June 2006 (UTC) Comment on the economics and politics of the article: Wikipedia is sopposed to be a source of all human knowledge, as long as the knowledge has support from credible sources. The economic and political debate certainly has credible sources. Indeed, global warming has very significant social effects, and they deserved to mentioned in an article about global warming, as long as the data does not shroud the science behind the theory. 20:21, 21	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
59,873,209	` :Another mass revert? That's the only major reversion I've made on this article. The only other reversion was the removal of a very POV paragraph recently added by Zaph. You're right, though, in that I should have stated my reasoning here (which you too are guilty of, btw). My reasoning for the reversion is that sourced information was removed without description (I do conced, though, that in one case I accidentally doubled information that was already included, and needed a citation). Yukirat asked me not to go into detail on my talk page, but I think it's better to do so. The reversion of information regarding Saracens in Spain was because it's better to be specific. Spain was ruled by Muslims during the middle ages and had Arab settlers there as a result. Maybe a better wording would be ``where Saracens and Moors ruled and settled for many centuries.`` The ``concentrated`` versus ``may be found`` is a style thing, as well as the fact that the newer ``may be found`` changes the information conveyed, which may or may not be correct (so I kept the earlier version). With regards to Southern Italians, again I was sticking to the earlier information, which was uncited, but so were the recent changes. I believe the older version with a {{fact}} added at the end. The re-inclusion of information on Irish Americans and Chinese Americans by me was because they were cited, and there was no reason not to include them as they were pertinent to the article. The Irish marrying fact is less obvious, but it shows that, despite being accepted as white, there need not be more integration within the ``white community`` than outside of it. With regard to my use of ``vary greatly,`` versus ``vary,`` it was more a style thing, but if the former is inaccurate, then I'll acquiesce. I see no reason not to include relevant sourced information, so Yukirat, I'm reinserting the information you reverted. If you wish to remove it, please state a reason on the talk page (which I should have done earlier, I apologize) before doing so. — (Yom) \| • `	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
59,879,787	==My Talk Page== Why can't I blank my own talk page, ass?	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
59,879,788	Polypaudio has been renamed to Pulse Audio.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
59,889,772	:I'm not surprised you thought of it, just wanted to remind you to try it before you do a lot of work on it -) I hope to see the finished product soon, maybe I'll start reading it more often when it is usable again.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
59,891,347	` ==Resposnonse to DVD glitches== I have the same DVD of the 1943 serial. I have noticed the same problems with it. The same scrachy audio in the first chapter,the same problem where Linda is talking to Bruce on the phone and the video skips back a minute to the two gangsters. I also saw the ``next chapter`` narration and clips edited out of the end of chapter 2. I was never able to find a VHS copy unfortunatly. Now that I have read DVD glitches I suspect that the problem is not the fault of the DVD but the film print that was used to make it.`	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
59,895,249	== NOT REAL == THIS GLOBAL WARMING YOU NON GOD FEARING DEMOCRATS TALK ABOUT IS FAKE! - PRESIDENT GEORGE WALKER BUSH	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
59,902,543	::There is too little writing for the amount of pictures we have. I've removed the lowest quality ones, as the article will never get to FAC with those poor quality pics. I've then rearranged the best pics & resized some. We could allow more pics, if they are of good quality, but for now the pics on the article are sufficient.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
59,903,440	(Betterly phrased, hey I created a new word, betterly!) As you may have noticed, I have removed a large amount of pictures from the T rex article. This is because 1) The pictures were of extrememly low quality (almost no visibility at all!). I have kept the best images. 2) The page was too overcrowded with less relevant pictures. For the amount of writing we have, it does not need that many. I have moved some, deleted others. 3) I can't think of 3 right now, but I reassure you of the importance of 1 & 2. The article will never make it through FAC with bad pictures. Asthetics is everything people. And remember to put a period (full stop (.)) after sentences in captions for pictures. Thanks,	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
59,906,204	I put the Chart Singles in the order they came out, that makes the most sense. I don't really get why that other stuff really matters, either.	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
59,912,753	Who was that jerk who blocked me?? Why some assholes have authority to block the others. Either you, pseudo grandmaster of azeri origin make your own corrections about Antient City of Shusha founded by Panah Khan in 18 century or I will keep vandalizing your stupid article and then write a special letter to wikipedia accusing you of spreading Azeri propaganda in Wikipedia. I wanna know the name of those assholes who tried to block me. Fucking idiots.	2,006	false	article	blocked	dev	true
59,912,933	SO far, no improvement, poor propaganda.	2,006	false	article	blocked	dev	false
59,916,045	` :That was a very rude comment from someone who indulges in the recreational use of drugs such as alcohol and coffee, according to his user page. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
59,917,790	` ==Answer to Mütze== Well, I am surprised to see that I am unblocked! At least, you still have seen that you targeted the wrong person for the wrong reasons!! Mütze, I have used this Wikipedia for only a few days but I am still not an idiot. Of course, what I say further below on what I think you did is an assumption but I believe a very good one! Here is what you did. You saw the following I posted on the Bosendorfer discussion page: ``Very soon, this article will be published and you will have to leave it this way; otherwise, the censors at Wikipedia will be forced to side with me (!!) considering the fact that I gave you the opportunity to challenge what I wrote in my article.``. As you clearly told me yourself, you did not want my article to be published. This quote clearly threatened you because I told taht I will soon publish my article and it will be with the full support of everybody because I used the discussion page of Bosendorfer. You then contacted Andrew Norman to block me to prevent me from editing the Bosendorfer discussion page and then you thought you could keep me away on my own user page with the intention of blocking me indefinitively. When you blocked me indefinitively through RobertG, you knew too well that no one could read my user page afterward! That is what I believe you did! And it is probably easily verifiable by people at Wikipedia. Now, what is your role at Wikipedia? You are not an administrator; otherwise you would have blocked me yourself directly! Anyway, I propose to carry on the discussion on the Bosendorfer discussion page concerning my article. I am ready to change sentences that cause problems. It is just up to you to mention these problematic sentences on this Bosendorfer discussion page and if you have a valid reason to have this sentence changed, it will be changed. I am not a fanatic and I am ready to please people. I will use logic and reason to assess a request to change sentences, not emotions. If I do not want to change a sentence, I will say clearly why and we could discuss further on this refusal to accept a change if it happens. And I will answer the points you raised in your previous postings, Mütze. So, I hope you will behave a little bit more relaxed about what I intend to do. The goal: publish a good article on a good product that inform people who read it. Apparently, for the time being, mostly the group of administrators and their friends (!!) who are the only ones who complained about my article so far. But to have had to go through such a nightmare just to want to publish a good article on Wikipedia is surely not the right way to do at Wikipedia with people who are ready to contribute positively!! You are really going to put people off wanting to write on Wikipedia! And I especially target the administrators who have been in contact with me in a very aggressive way. Just a few days ago, I did not even know that what an administrator was at Wikipedia! Here is what Jimbo Wales says on his user page: ``Newcomers are always to be welcomed. There must be no cabal, there must be no elites, there must be no hierarchy or structure which gets in the way of this openness to newcomers.``. If he knews what I had to go through and the very aggressive behaviour I experienced from administrators at Wikipedia, he would not be very pleased. What I say above, he call it one of his main principles! So, administrators, when you contact people, make sure you remember this very core principle of one of the founders of Wikipedia and target the true vandals instead of people like me who are willing to add a good article to Wikipedia! Jimbo Wales wants people to write as many articles as possible on Wikipedia. Your role as administrators is to help and encourage them to do so instead of trying to block them indefinitively! So, I hope you can now all relax and not get emotional or upset on this coming article. I follow the process used by Wikipedia to deal with an article that causes opposition. See the new comments now on the Bosendorfer discussion page and state the sentences that cause you problems and especially why these sentences are problematic. Then, I will do my best to change them to please everybody. MichaelIsGreat`	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
59,921,726	Huh? Didn't understand what you're asking sorry...	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
59,928,924	:Absolutely fabulous! Now what do I do with it? Do I have to get it approved or anything? You're really special! Thanks a lot!	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
59,929,281	And I believe you're being an arse, but hey, I cope....	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	true
59,929,753	::Thanks a bunch! You're awesome!...	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
59,930,274	==To Mütze== To Mütze, I ask you to contact RobertG and to ask him to unblock me because there is no valid reasons to have blocked me in the first place. RobertG let his emotions take control of his behaviour when facts should have been his way of assessing his decision! There is not a single fact against me that warrants blocking me indefinitely. In any case, I will contact the founders of Wikipedia about your shameful behaviour. MichaelIsGreat	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
59,931,165	Oh, I hope this is right: Wikipedia:Other awards/Wikiproject.. And I also hope you don't mind that I credited you too. Thanks again, & if you need anything, (you probably wont cause you're soo much better at barnstars than me), then don't hesitate to ask...	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
59,932,297	== Testing, testing, 1 2 3.... == , give the first new Dinosaur Barnstar to Sheepy for his edits to the subject, .]] Thought I'd test out the new barnstar Sango created for us from my idea. Hope you like it & put it above Firsfron's cause his isn't as pretty, & this is the first of these ever given out... Have fun...	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
59,934,235	==Tactics= What were the tactics in this war? Did the Vietnamese fight the Chinese in the same way they fought the Americans? Did the Chinese try to use a different approach than the U.S. did in fighting this war?	2,006	false	article	blocked	test	false
59,938,997	==Rockabilly== I have downloaded and listened to Johnny Rebel and that is not rockabilly music. Rockabilly is typified by steel-stringed acoustic electric guitar, slap bass, and echochambered vocals. Of these the only possible elements that could apply is steel-stringed acoustic electric guitar. As such I removed the rockabilly artist categorization.	2,006	false	article	random	train	false
59,940,745	== This guy... == sucks kobe's nuts: http://youtube.com/watch?v=LtqFB0ji358&search;=kobe%20dunks%20on%20shaq	2,006	false	article	random	train	true
59,944,795	The article itself states that Arabs make up a small part of the population of Bay Ridge, yet someone gave it it's own section...if you're going to do that then you need to write a section on the Irish, Norwegian, Italian, and Greeks of the neighborhood as well.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
59,955,795	Viral is a faggot mother fucker in the shit of the crap stritting.	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	true
59,958,507	== You need a life == REALLY BAD.......................BITCH!	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	true
59,969,603	How the F am I vandalising? Where am I vandalising?	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
59,969,810	`::``your comments only support the inherent racism of Anglo-Celtic Australians``... I stated that lebanese were targeted and, hence, it was lebanese who retaliated... ie, no one retaliates on beahlf of some other group- at Punchbowl park where NSW Police observed the ``conveys`` which raided society, on the road graffiti on the road stated ``LIONS OF LEBANON`` - THERE``S YOU``RE EVIDENCE - if reason and logic are ``racism`` then it explians why you Leftists cannot think at all - where were your comments when a young Australian girl was raped because she was Australian... you were silent, so don't know say one word now... `	2,006	false	article	blocked	test	false
59,970,395	` your interpretation of the above words does not make it a ``personal attack`` it is what is in you that makes you interpret it in that way... I am the author of it, and, hence, i know what i meant... ````Take any action allow=d to be vicious: Wilful murder, for instance. Examine it in all lights, and see if you can find that matter of fact, or real existence, which you call vice. In which-ever way you take it you find only certain passions, motives, volitions and thoughts. There is no other matter of fact in the case. The vice entirely escapes you, as long as you consider the object. You never can find it, till you turn your reflexion into your own breast, and find a sentiment of disapprobation, which arises in you, towards this action. Here is a matter of fact; but >tis the object of feeling, not of reason.```` HUME -`	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
59,972,201	` for example, if i were to say that you are ``defficient in the immoral`` then to you it is not a personl attack as you consider that to be good, but if i menat it to be an attack, then it is... it is your inner setiment that dictates the way you interpret it as good or as bad... but it is not in the thing itself, or what i menat it to be... open your eyes to reality and wake up from your conditioned sleep ;) read above, what is it to be moral anyway? you fool - maybe it is good to be a fool, but if you think it is not, then that is youre propblem ;) i cant be held accountable for your inner interpretatons and psychology ;)`	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
59,972,417	No way, I removed them.	2,006	false	article	random	train	false
59,975,234	::No sweat dude. I probably deserved it... ;)	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
59,979,396	`I am sorry, but the situation is far from resolved for me. The bottom line is that I assume that there is actually some sort of process that must be followed before a single individual can simply ban me from correcting the systematic bias of another editor. Has been cautioned regarding his systematic bias, or his wild accusations against all who oppose him? What about the admin protecting pages, without placing protection notices on them, for ``wikistalking``, when he edits in concert with IronDuke on various anti-Arab pages? I stopped editing only because of your threat of a ban, but the pages in questions: Portland Seven and related pages are still the subject of IronDuke's anti-Arab POV. Simply ``asking another admin`` an unnamed one, at an unscheduled future date to ``look into`` does not really answer my question regarding an appeal process. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
59,979,646	== Applicability to Wikipedia == To what degree (if any) does this apply to Wikipedia? (This may not be the right place to ask, but I don't know where else). AFAIK, Wikipedia does not ask for a birthdate, and it does contain information that might fall under the descriptions included. Does anyone know?	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
59,981,718	Vampires being strong comes from folklore so leave it alone please.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
59,986,638	` which do not even have an online edition, let alone something that is accesible for paid useers. Any way, I will try to give some references (from standard books) while updating the article in future == First clinical syndrome == About your article First Clinical Syndrome, I have changed it to a redirect to the article medical student syndrome. Medical student syndrome is a much more commonly used term, and the phenomenon is a global one. Therefore, there shouldn't be different articles for the same term in regional dialects of English. You are free to add more to medical student syndrome. I couldn't find anything in your article to merge, however. :I've reverted that. See talk:medical student syndrome. == Ayyavazhi and Duryodhana == While there is nothing wrong in mentioning Duryodhana in the Ayyavazhi articles, it is not appropriate to insert it in the main Duryodhana article. Ayyavazhi is not notable enough to be mentioned there and in a number of places. It is the same as including Ayyavazhi in the Menstrual cycle article (see ). There is nothing wrong creating dozens of Ayyavazhi articles, but it is wrong creating links from every possible location on WP. - ===Ayyavazhi=== When you have * 13.1 Buddhism on menstruation * 13.2 Christianity on menstruation * 13.3 Hinduism on menstruation * 13.4 Islam on menstruation * 13.5 Judaism on menstruation * 13.6 Sikhism on menstruation * 13.7 Tribal societies and menstruation * 13.8 Mysticism What is wrong in Having Ayyavazhi on Menstraution Please note that I am not a follower of that religion, but I feel that we don't have any right to deny an existence of a religion. When you permit Tribal societies and Mysticism, I feel that Ayyavazhi has a place. This is my opinion. Please correct me if I am wrong. I want a discussion and not argument Similarly, I feel that it should be included in the list of religions also :Hi! All the religions you mention about are a million times more notable than Ayyavazhi. Ayyavazhi is not even a recognised religion in India. Wikipedia has a Notability guideline which prevents us from doing precicely this. There a literally thousands of minor religions in this world, and all of them probably have an opinion on menstruation. What will happen if all these thousands of religions want mention in that article? We are compiling an encyclopedia, not a world fact book.Tribal societies and mysticism are generalised sections in that article which give an overview of the practices. Ayyavazhi with its miniscule followers does not belong in that article. - ===Duryodhana=== When you are mentioning ``In Kumaon region of Uttranchal`` in the page of Duryodhana and not limiting to mention Duryodhana in Kumaon (for example), I think the same logic should be followed for Ayyavazhi also Again this is MY opinion and I would like to see a consensus Please correct me if I am wrong. I want a discussion and not an argument The following copied from - ===Recognition=== With reference to your comment on my talk page that ``Ayyavazhi is not even a recognised religion in India``, Sorry for my ignorance. What is a ``recognised religion`` in India By the way, my district collector (meaning State Govt) declares an holiday on one of their festivals Any how, my simple question is that ``Just because we are not aware of something, it is justified that we oppose articles about it in Wikipedia`` Again this is MY opinion and I would like to see a consensus I suppose the census data is one of the things that distinguish a 'recognised' relegion. This page contains the data from the 2001 census and a spreadsheet which contains state-wise data. The data from Tamil Nadu has the number of Hindus, Christians, Muslims, Sikhs, Jains, Budhists, Others and Relegion not stated. There are 54985079 Hindus, 7252 'others' and 59344 who have not stated their relegion. Obviously, the government has not counted Ayyavazhi as a seperate relegion. The government in 2001 may not have counted Ayyavazhi as a seperate religion. But the same government declares an occasion as Gazetted Holiday in 2006 (for the first time). Does it tell you something. If there is a change in 2006, why not we accept that ::When did TN government's vote grabbing attempts become equivalant to official recognition?! BTW the holiday was declared in a couple of districts of TN, and not for whole state. Does this make Ayyavazhi notable enough to include in a encyclopediaic summary article of a bodily function? I don't think so - :::To answer your question ``If we are not aware of something, does it justify opposing it?`` - Of course it does. That is how WP evolves - through negotiations and challenges and verifiability. If the subject is proven to be verifiable then it is allowed to exist by the community. Ayyavazhi in my opinion has utterly failed in the notability and verifiability criteria. Going by your argument anyone can create any article on any subject and use your argument to justify its existence. It will totally undermine WP's reliability as a source. - :::I think you have totally misunderstood my reply. I said WP evolves and grows based on challenges and skepticism by the WP community. We don't (shouldn't) anything at face value. The most imortant criteria in Wikipedia is its Verifiability. For example, if I create an article on, say, a species of three eyed monkey, and base the article solely on my having seen the monkey, it will be challenged and deleted from WP. Notability and verifiability demands that any subject documented should be (a) verifiable - ie should be independently documented from a neutral point of view by a reliable third party, meaning I can't one of my friends to create a website on the three-eyed monkey and cite that website as reference in my WP article, and (b) Notable - ie should be relatively well know beyond a select group of people. In this example, I can't claim notability for the three-eyed monkey just because myself and a friend of mine have seen it. :::If an article is questioned based on the notability and verifiability criteria, it is not because the article is untrue, but it just means it is not a suitable WP article. An encyclopedia does not contain unverified information, nor does it contain original research. :::I am not familiar with your problems with the article Medical School but it does show that WP works. There is a conversation happening and a compromise will be reached. :::Coming to the Ayyavazhi issue, I have nothing against the faith itself or its followers. My only issue was the way had inserted Ayyavazhi is places it does not belong. There is no reason an obscure faith such as Ayyavazhi should be listed on par with the world's major religions. :::- See this discussion. The same user had gone and created hundreds of links on pages with no apparent connection with Ayyavazhi. The List of religions page perhaps warrents a mention os Ayyavazhi, that is why I agreed to leave it there. But See and and even the . I think this is a blatent attempts of evangelical zeal that does not have a place in WP - ::::What I meant by When did TN government's vote grabbing attempts become equivalant to official recognition? was was this the first time TN government try to get the votes of a minority group. Obviously there are quite a few followers of Ayyavazhi in the districts mentioned, although they may think themselves as non-hindus. Declaring a holiday IMO is a way of pandering to this group. - :::::Let's not go into all that. Yes, Ayyavazhi merits a place in List of Religions, but not in summary articles like Menstrual Cycle etc., at least not yet. Let us try to add valid references from among those suggested by Vaikunda Raja at Talk:History of Tamil Nadu. I'd suggest that they publish more on this subject in peer-reviewed conferences and journals and then add relevant references here. Because, Wikipedia is not a place for submitting primary research	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
59,994,798	` (UTC) == Asian Racial origins of the Slavs == Similar to Alfred Rosenberg's claims of peoples of Southern Europe descended from Africans, Semites and Moors, the peoples of Eastern Europe were alleged to have Mongolian blood. Anyone who studied this segment of world history knew the Mongols invaded (western) Russia in the late 13th century (1200s) and they remained there in Siberian Russia until the early 1500s. The 'untermenschen' claim included in many statements of the Nazis, like Alfred Rosenberg's use of the pejorative term ``Tatars`` or Turkic-Altaic races of Northwest Asia to describe Slavs, also mentioned Russians and other Slavs are inbred from Asian ``Mongolian`` blood. Most Russians in the western edges of the country have small amounts of non-Caucasoid blood, but the majority of native Asians whom intermarried the Russians/Slavs live in the enormously large country's Central and East parts, or Siberia. The commonly anti-Semitic and racial (if not based on religious differences) views on Russians and Slavs are under ``Jew control`` is odious and false, then to add any Jewish roots in the general Slavic population is part of the Nazis' ``untermenschen`` agenda. I wonder there's a farther addition to nationalist rhetoric on the Slavs are ``blood relatives`` of the Chinese, Japanese, Oriental/East Asians, etc. when anthropology disprove most Nazi ideologue on the Slavs' Asian-Mongolian origins. Anthropology was able to determine an actual link with Polynesians and Native Americans share genetic and physiological connections with North or East Asians or ``Mongolians``, although the split of these ``races`` took place over 10,000 years ago. But there's no such scientific claim on the prototype Caucasian Slavs are part of the ``Oriental Asian/Sino-Mongolian`` race was completed, unless a much larger European element diluted remnants of the Mongolian era (or their genes) after the 1500s, before the Russians' expansion to the east (Siberia and North Asia). It's the same logic applied to whether or not a high frequency of Arabic, Moorish or African genes exist in the Spanish and Italian peoples, still a theory or those genes nearly vanished over time. + 13:43, 22 June 2006`	2,006	false	article	random	train	false
59,998,973	== Added buddhist group and made list alphabetical. == I added the budhist group following several news reports on the sacking of the CWC centre. I know that budhists claim non violence however so do most religous groups. I made the list alphabetical to avoid claims of bias	2,006	false	article	random	test	false
60,002,867	` ::::Yes it most definitely does. But burger from hamburger (as the article states) most definitely doesn't. `	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
60,008,479	:Do they own it? You know, going to a realtor, paying a down-payment and closing costs. Probably not. It's not theirs. A movement? Whatever. Take the pillow from your head and put a book in it! - KRS-ONE MEGA	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
60,009,144	I really don't have a clue what you are talking about. The only edits I made speculating about naming nomenclature were to an article about the name of a german synogogue.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
60,009,587	==LUL== Ok i will remove the images if they are presumed copyrighted. Apologies in the meen time.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
60,010,542	::Perhaps :::Wilhelmstrasse (Wilhelmstraße in Germany: see ß) ::is better. Stemonitis, is of course right that it is not only in Germany where this street name is Wilhelmstraße, but that might be a bit beside the point because in fact this street is in Germany so we should not need to mention how the name is written in Austria, say, in the lead. Again, this is not a terribly big point but I certainly think the ß link is useful.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
60,029,333	` ==No problem== I thought you'd up and left the Wiki, but I guess not! Thursday, June 22, 2006, 17:44 (UTC) `	2,006	false	user	random	dev	false
60,029,435	== getting pics into the commons == I can't figure out how to get my images listed in the U of L commons. Also, (this is embarrasing) how does one sign the edit summary with the arrow and section name?	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
60,031,210	ANN COULTER IS A NO GOOD FUCKING CUNT AND SHE IS GOING TO HELL ALONMG SIDE WITH THE FUCK HEAD GEORGE W. BUSH!!! THE THE GOP!!! THE RIGHT = RICH OLD ASS WHO HATE THE POOR PEOPLE AND WANT MORE!!!	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	true
60,038,276	== User page andalism revert == Appreciated. Thanks	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
60,042,140	I would like for images I uploaded related to the University of Louisville, as Image:Softball06.JPG,, to be come up in the wikimedia U of L commons. I have tryed adding the images with the cat. U of Lou., but they still don't show up. As for the 'arrow and name' thing, I finally found out it is by /* */	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
60,042,904	` == For those who have a care and can think for themselves == As a Wikipedian and American citizen it is my privilege and right to learn. It is my pleasure to know what the truth is, or at least question what we take for granted. First of all we have to understand how the U.S. works; understand the messes we get ouselves in. * The U.S. is probably the largest terrorist supporting nation in the entire world(i.e. through the NYSE and CIA drug trafficking, which are very closely related). * The U.S. put Saddam in power after the first Gulf War. * The CIA trained, funded, and provided the Taliban with weapons. * 9/11 is probably the most misplaced event in regards to the President's many Iraq war discussions and comments * The attacks on 9/11 still remain a mystery today. Not to mention, ``smart`` investors made million of dollars on put-options through the NYSE (i.e. the put-options were made on Boeing Co. and the insurance companies the World Trade towers were insured on). * The FBI still holds vast amounts of evidence that was taken from the various 9/11 attacks form the World Trade towers to the attack on the pentagon. * Several newspapers and others media from other countries (e.g. Israel and India) knew many weeks in advance about the 9/11 attacks. * The real reason we are in Iraq still is a mystery and that is why it is heavily debated and questioned My suggestion is continue to question what the media of our nation tells us. I also would like to suggest a few good sources of information, which many authorities and officials would lay to claim as ``crackpot`` theories and conspiracies. Despite the fact that if the questions regarding 9/11, Iraq, terrorism, CIA drug trafficking, and the U.S. government in general, then there would be no conspiracy. Open your eyes to a few good experiences: Documentaries: 911 Loose Change 2nd Edition[121] and Truth and Lies of 9/11[122] Books: Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Center Disaster The Five Unanswered Questions About 9/11 and The New Pearl Harbor Websites: www.fromthewilderness.com www.conspiracyplanet.com www.911truth.org www.911blogger.com And there are millions more. Just get out there and you will discover a whole different view. Above all let this be an addition to your knowledge and views so that you may embrace a more worldly view and a more accurate idea of our existence. Remember after you have dug deep enough ask yourselve these questions, ``Why are we in Iraq, what is the idea of spreading ``democracy`` in the Middle-East, and finally is the Iraq war really a ``war on terrorism``? I will save all the time of looking for yourself...the reason why we are in Iraq is geostrategy and obvious imperialistic ambtions...the idea of ``democracy`` and ``war on terrorism`` is most definitely flawed, it's money the U.S. is after. After all, the U.S. thrives on terrorism and exploitation of third world countries, that's global economy, that's global super-power, that's the U.S. That is not what I stand for and I hope you have the ability to stand for you rights and ideas. Don't sit back and watch all this happen and ignore others' ideas or opinions, that would be ignorant and unintelligent, act for your freedom and the freedom of others (i.e. what democracy is).Existential Thinker`	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
60,045,373	:I try just typing the section name and it doesn't do it. As for the pictures, who is best to ask about the media commons problem?	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
60,048,237	` ==Scientology?== When Panda first rolled out its antivirus service, people were buzzing about it being either owned or produced by strict Scientologists. Any truth here? If so it definitely this certainly merits noting in the article (as a matter of ``the whole truth`` and public safety). Also, if this question is edited out without comment, you can expect to blow some whistles. `	2,006	false	article	random	dev	false
60,048,791	`For the record, I mean nothing very special or unusual by ``rational discussion`` and Xed's personal attacks are nothing new. I do not expect nor ask for people to be loyal to me, at all times or otherwise. Xed knows this; he is hoping that others do not. `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
60,049,548	` You may do that if you want to and I suggest that you add some more blocking hours because he actually is a cyber clown, like yourself: There do not exist many MGRs but only one single MGR which with the exception of a few people at the University of Munich and at some other places. So, how can you, grandfather Zens and cyper clown Philosophus say that it had all the time beem ignored? Are you both not quite right in your heads? By the way, is in the Encyclopaedia Britannica, for instance, written that these four journals are ``looked at with suspicion``? I must say to you, Zens, that you are an entirely immature boy who even seems not to be aware of the legal relevance of writing about other journals in this degrading style. Who do you think you are? For any of these journals an editorial staff of some dozens of scientists and physics teachers works, and great Zens and Jcobinus Magnus look al all these pursons with suspicion! I think the first thing you should do here is that you both first formally apologize to the editors-in-chief if these four journals. If you don't do it then fuck off and do not bother me any more with our silly and idiotic questions. Everything clear, you fools? KraMuc, 22 June 2006.`	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
60,049,629	` :: Firstly, it isn't up to me to do your research for you. It's your information that you seem determined to insert prominently near the top of the article, so the burden is on you to provide proper cited sources for it. I already made my contribution: I prefer to just jettison the entire paragraph, as I already did, or at least move it somewhere much lower in the article. Secondly, some of the stuff you just mentioned are still various rock critics giving their own opinions of ``obvious`` influences. To say ``Coldplay is influenced by Oasis``, we need a source with an actual band member stating words to this effect. Thirdly, why is it so important to you to devote so much time, space, and effort to Coldplay's influences, and why is it important enough to be so near the top of the article? `	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
60,050,714	for your bad behaviour	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
60,053,521	== Innocent of the Accusings of the Crapholeistan Government! == Do not accuse me! I am always the truths be TELLING! Highest authorities! Sincerement: Joergen, d/b/a VERITOLOGIST I Thanks You!	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
60,053,764	:Way to not even read the edit I made, smart one.	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
60,054,864	Stop vandalizing Wikipedia.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
60,055,238	Stop vandalizing the Byrchall High School page.	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
60,060,354	Sorry! Won't happen again! - 22 June 2006 03:58 pm.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
60,062,626	:::The thing is... :::Flags out: neutral to non Spanish viewers because flags don't mean anything to them, BUT NOT neutral to a large part of Spanish viewers because it shows a false, fabricated unicultural vision of Spain, the unitary vision of Spain is a right wing view and a clear residue of Franco's cultural genocide between 1939 and 1975, as much as Wikifrikiuser tries to obviate it. :::Flags in: it represents a point of view that will not mind non Spanish users as they don't know what they are, and it represents a neutral and real multicultural point of view for Spanish viewers, not a biased and fabricated one as what some people here are trying to impose. :::Conclusion: Flags in shouldn't offend anyone because it's the real thing, flags out offend as it's a lack of respect and authoritarism for supressing the reality	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
60,063,453	Personal experience of what may be no more than one group of regular returnees is not factual evidence of all travellers. My personal experience has been mostly of well-mannered, albeit rough round the edges types who treated me with a great deal of respect, however I accept that's not the same in every case, and would not put it down as fact for all travellers.	2,006	false	article	random	train	false
60,064,228	Hi Alpachimp, Have you any friends? Best Wishes, Hernan Crespo	2,006	false	user	blocked	test	false
60,064,296	I don't think so Hernan. Cheers, Lionel Messi	2,006	false	user	blocked	dev	false
60,064,399	Well played the other day. Yeah, that Alphachimp definitely has no friends. Regards, Juan Pablo Sorin	2,006	false	user	blocked	dev	false
60,064,586	He does have a few friends, but no friends on the Argentine World Cup squad 2006. Many Thanks, Javier Saviola	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
60,064,732	We were all quite friendly with him in the 2002 World Cup squad, but we slightly blamed him for going out at the first round. Yours, Gabriel Batistuta	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
60,065,271	Good stuff. Do you think the way the book is used in the article can be attributed to good faith error, or intentional misrepresentation?	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
60,065,460	get out my large penis	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	true
60,076,123	` == Speedy deletion == Regarding the article Image:466px-Hurricane Dennis.jpg, which you tagged for speedy deletion with the reason ``This image is a redundant (all pixels the same or scaled down) copy of Image:Hurricane Dennis on July 7 2005 1550 UTC.jpg, in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not Commons), and all inward links have been updated (CSD I1)``, I wanted you to know that I have removed the speedy deletion tag. This article does not qualify for speedy deletion because this is not correct, the other image you quoted is on Commons. If you still want the article to be deleted, please use the WP:IFD process. Thanks! `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
60,078,563	== Jaime Foxx Show == Did Kandi Burruss play on the Jaime Foxx show for awhile?	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
60,078,649	*Jimmy is based on Geri Jewell from the Facts of Life. Phoenix Frou	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
60,079,827	I would but it wouldn't matter if I got a link to a website that has a video of John Cena declaring his love for cartoons and announcing he wants to play Dave The Barbarian in a live action movie. Lil crazy thing WILL delete it and say it's not a reliable source or it doesn't matter. She doesn't want me contributing.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
60,080,592	== Collaboration == Hi Jayant. Let me unconfuse you about the whole collaboration thingy. It basically works like the Article Improvement Drive, where people vote for an article they really really want edited. You can still edit other articles, & you don't even have to edit the article nominated, but it just helps focus the group's attention at improving a single article. So continue editing as you were, & feel free to vote or edit the nominated article. Thanks,	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
60,081,418	::::: It's not enough to strenghten a notion. If an editor is misrepresenting text here, that's a serious matter, and should be dealt with.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
60,085,629	== Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Velociraptor == Fixed one of your requests. Working on the other... Thanks,	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
60,085,721	` ``It's all in the family as lawmakers hire``], AP, April 15, 2006.`	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
60,085,801	== Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Velociraptor == Fixed your request. I hope you will be able to support now. Thanks,	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
60,086,077	== Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Velociraptor == Fixed one of your requests on the article, also commented to the rest. Would like to here from you. Thanks,	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
60,086,449	` == Manners And Etiquette == Thaey are the same thing, no?GorillazFan `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
60,088,694	`Thank you for experimenting with the page Wikipedia talk:Searching on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. e `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
60,089,450	, showing the relationship inline in both	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
60,098,185	*Support. I have also elsewhere represented the interpretation that firstname + ordinal + of + country is suitable naming format for quite a many sovereign monarchs, irrespective of the technical title usually or somehow applied (possibly retrospectively) to that monarchy. Here, the interpretation fits well, and we avoid potential move wars whether the guy was Prince-Bishop, Prince, Vladika or Prince-Vladika or should any of those actually be translated in some other way.	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
60,098,840	::::: In case you missed what I said earlier, I don't even think the paragraph should BE in the article, therefore I am not going to contribute to its sourcing and its existence. I'm already compromising with you by trying to clean it up. If it MUST be there, at least let it done properly. I am not going to argue about this any further.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
60,099,664	`to say that there is an ``inherent racism of Anglo-Celtic Australians`` is racist in itself, or at least a personal attack - and if I respond to that racist statement, then I am refered to a ``no personal attack policy`` - its always the same with the Leftists... people are terrorised in society, hassled, intimidatd, threatened, hated, raped all because of an underlying racism for infidels and Australians, and no one says a word, but then some people respond and throw some bottles, and all the Leftists come out of the wood work - Anglo saxons are not raping on racial lines... are not stabbing people in the back at 16th birthday parties, not dirve by shooting in the West etc I have a SOURCE for you... it comes form the article itself... ````they encountered carloads of men with Lebanese flags hanging out the windows and heard one man screaming, ``Do it for Allah!```` I don't suppose that sounds like the vietnamese, italians, or jews - all of which have managed to 'fit; into Australian society, keeping their beautiful cultures strong for a multicultural Australia, but have not raped an ``Aussie slut`` because she ``deserves it because she is Asutralian`` to date... ;) I love Indonesian Muslims in Lombock, so im not against muslims... I love lebanses christians... so im not racist towards middle easterns and im not against lebanese, I am merely against a Lebanese muslim CULTURE... ``culture`` is the key word... its not about some Ayrians supperiority, or genetics, its about a mere conduct of people that i find abhorant and asocial... the culture of rape is linked to the islamic sheikes who preach ``strappless backless`` cluts are targets for rape... i don;t happen to like that culture... DO YOU?? `	2,006	false	article	blocked	dev	false
60,101,579	` :::::: Who is saying ``other approaches have an equivalent scientific pedigree to twin studies``? You said that, not I, and neither does the article. Therefore i am not obliged to justify their merits, nor am interested in spelling out the alternatives, as i (personally) do not think the section reqires such detail. Its simply important (in my opinion) to illustrate that twin studies are not the exclusive tool which scientists have used to find these suggestive associations. They may be the best, they may be the most common, but they are not exclusive. That is clear from the sources i provided. ::::::Let me explain to you what happened. Without justification, Cesar deleted the bold text from this section: ::The reasons offered for the relative lack of genetic understanding is because the links between genes and mental states defined as abnormal appear highly complex, involve extensive environmental influences and can be mediated in numerous different ways, for example by personality, temperament or life events. Therefore while twin studies and other research suggests that personality is heritable to some extent, the genetic basis for particular personality or temperament traits, and their links to mental health problems, is currently unclear :::::: I replaced it because it is a more accurate, and informative, reflection of reality with it in. You questioned why. So I provided references. One of these references says the following (my bold): :: Twin studies show that co-morbidity within anxiety disorders and between anxiety disorders and depression is explained by a shared genetic vulnerability for both disorders. Some family studies support this conclusion, but others suggest that co-morbidity is due to one disorder being an epiphenomenon of the other. :::::: Now, please tell me why the above reference, specifically the words in bold, is not an appropriate source for the assertion that i reverted? That is all i did and that is all i am interested in discussing. Should you feel you can further improve this section by rewording, then please do so. But please do not continue to infer greater meaning behind this very simple and justifiable edit. A little good faith would not go amiss. Thank you. e `	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
60,102,363	Thank you for experimenting with the page Captain Beefheart on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. — @	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
60,105,411	It doesn't matter whether you or I know it.	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
60,107,855	` *actually, I was ``vandalizing`` an article tagged as clear patent nonsense, instead of blocking me, you could be deleting ``Buddha Khan``, but instead you pick on the poor AOL user `	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
60,107,908	The article in general just needs to be cleaned up and written from an encyclopedic POV.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
60,109,753	` == Steven E. Jones == in response to please stop deleting tags at will. Those tags were originally chosen by Morton devonshire, who made the following change first. Anyone making such a change should not be editing wikipedia. Your own comments (``conspiracy theorist``) is harrassment and not professional. Using that term shows that you are not taking the issue seriously. Therefore, you should not be editing these 9/11 pages. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false

59,852,847

` That scandal almost led to the Cardinal having to resign in 2003, and he had to appear on ``Newsnight`` to apologize for his ``stupid`` handling of the case. The article has to mention it because it has been a defining issue of his time as Archbishop of Westminster - many Catholics in England believe he now operates under a doubtful moral authority.`

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

59,855,575

Not only is your block unwarranted, but you have blatantly violated the 3RR policy on the global warming article. It's you who is the one that should be blocked.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

59,855,583

== Neil Diamond == Is Dustin Diamond related to the singer/songwriter Neil Diamond? - 21 June 2006 01:44 pm

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

59,856,561

== Was was the show canceled? == I watched the show and I just want to know why this ok show was canceled?

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

59,857,359

:::You're not assuming good faith. I read the article the day the movie came out, so I was unaware of the correction. I read the article in its original form which thoroughly bashed the movie. Furthermore, my statements about Michael Chrichton were very accurate. I also put this in the alternative theories section since this is the minority view. But something being a minority view doesn't make it an incorrect view or vandalism. If you disagree with me, you can reword my blurb to your liking, but to call it vandalism is petty.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

59,858,493

:::The links backing up my comments: , , , and .

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

59,866,020

` Read: * Cheney, Margaret, ``Tesla: Man Out of Time``, ISBN 0-13-906859-7 * Seifer, Marc J., ``Wizard, the Life and Times of Nikola Tesla``. ISBN 1-559723-29-7 (HC), ISBN 0-806519-60-6 (SC) * O'Neill, John H., ``Prodigal Genius``. ISBN 0-914732-33-1 These should contain the references that you need. This page also give a tast of the news reports about it. Edison and Tesla Win Nobel Prize in Physics. Literary Digest, December 18, 1915. There isn't anything ``fan-like`` about this. It's statements of fact. `

2,006

false

article

random

dev

false

59,872,256

is western hemisphere also Germany? Because we got at least 6 egyptology departments! kind regards GoJoe

2,006

false

article

blocked

dev

false

59,872,488

June 2006 (UTC) Comment on the economics and politics of the article: Wikipedia is sopposed to be a source of all human knowledge, as long as the knowledge has support from credible sources. The economic and political debate certainly has credible sources. Indeed, global warming has very significant social effects, and they deserved to mentioned in an article about global warming, as long as the data does not shroud the science behind the theory. 20:21, 21

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

59,873,209

` :Another mass revert? That's the only major reversion I've made on this article. The only other reversion was the removal of a very POV paragraph recently added by Zaph. You're right, though, in that I should have stated my reasoning here (which you too are guilty of, btw). My reasoning for the reversion is that sourced information was removed without description (I do conced, though, that in one case I accidentally doubled information that was already included, and needed a citation). Yukirat asked me not to go into detail on my talk page, but I think it's better to do so. The reversion of information regarding Saracens in Spain was because it's better to be specific. Spain was ruled by Muslims during the middle ages and had Arab settlers there as a result. Maybe a better wording would be ``where Saracens and Moors ruled and settled for many centuries.`` The ``concentrated`` versus ``may be found`` is a style thing, as well as the fact that the newer ``may be found`` changes the information conveyed, which may or may not be correct (so I kept the earlier version). With regards to Southern Italians, again I was sticking to the earlier information, which was uncited, but so were the recent changes. I believe the older version with a {{fact}} added at the end. The re-inclusion of information on Irish Americans and Chinese Americans by me was because they were cited, and there was no reason not to include them as they were pertinent to the article. The Irish marrying fact is less obvious, but it shows that, despite being accepted as white, there need not be more integration within the ``white community`` than outside of it. With regard to my use of ``vary greatly,`` versus ``vary,`` it was more a style thing, but if the former is inaccurate, then I'll acquiesce. I see no reason not to include relevant sourced information, so Yukirat, I'm reinserting the information you reverted. If you wish to remove it, please state a reason on the talk page (which I should have done earlier, I apologize) before doing so. — (Yom) | • `

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

59,879,787

==My Talk Page== Why can't I blank my own talk page, ass?

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

59,879,788

Polypaudio has been renamed to Pulse Audio.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

59,889,772

:I'm not surprised you thought of it, just wanted to remind you to try it before you do a lot of work on it -) I hope to see the finished product soon, maybe I'll start reading it more often when it is usable again.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

59,891,347

` ==Resposnonse to DVD glitches== I have the same DVD of the 1943 serial. I have noticed the same problems with it. The same scrachy audio in the first chapter,the same problem where Linda is talking to Bruce on the phone and the video skips back a minute to the two gangsters. I also saw the ``next chapter`` narration and clips edited out of the end of chapter 2. I was never able to find a VHS copy unfortunatly. Now that I have read DVD glitches I suspect that the problem is not the fault of the DVD but the film print that was used to make it.`

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

59,895,249

== NOT REAL == THIS GLOBAL WARMING YOU NON GOD FEARING DEMOCRATS TALK ABOUT IS FAKE! - PRESIDENT GEORGE WALKER BUSH

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

59,902,543

::There is too little writing for the amount of pictures we have. I've removed the lowest quality ones, as the article will never get to FAC with those poor quality pics. I've then rearranged the best pics & resized some. We could allow more pics, if they are of good quality, but for now the pics on the article are sufficient.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

59,903,440

(Betterly phrased, hey I created a new word, betterly!) As you may have noticed, I have removed a large amount of pictures from the T rex article. This is because 1) The pictures were of extrememly low quality (almost no visibility at all!). I have kept the best images. 2) The page was too overcrowded with less relevant pictures. For the amount of writing we have, it does not need that many. I have moved some, deleted others. 3) I can't think of 3 right now, but I reassure you of the importance of 1 & 2. The article will never make it through FAC with bad pictures. Asthetics is everything people. And remember to put a period (full stop (.)) after sentences in captions for pictures. Thanks,

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

59,906,204

I put the Chart Singles in the order they came out, that makes the most sense. I don't really get why that other stuff really matters, either.

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

59,912,753

Who was that jerk who blocked me?? Why some assholes have authority to block the others. Either you, pseudo grandmaster of azeri origin make your own corrections about Antient City of Shusha founded by Panah Khan in 18 century or I will keep vandalizing your stupid article and then write a special letter to wikipedia accusing you of spreading Azeri propaganda in Wikipedia. I wanna know the name of those assholes who tried to block me. Fucking idiots.

2,006

false

article

blocked

dev

true

59,912,933

SO far, no improvement, poor propaganda.

2,006

false

article

blocked

dev

false

59,916,045

` :That was a very rude comment from someone who indulges in the recreational use of drugs such as alcohol and coffee, according to his user page. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

59,917,790

` ==Answer to Mütze== Well, I am surprised to see that I am unblocked! At least, you still have seen that you targeted the wrong person for the wrong reasons!! Mütze, I have used this Wikipedia for only a few days but I am still not an idiot. Of course, what I say further below on what I think you did is an assumption but I believe a very good one! Here is what you did. You saw the following I posted on the Bosendorfer discussion page: ``Very soon, this article will be published and you will have to leave it this way; otherwise, the censors at Wikipedia will be forced to side with me (!!) considering the fact that I gave you the opportunity to challenge what I wrote in my article.``. As you clearly told me yourself, you did not want my article to be published. This quote clearly threatened you because I told taht I will soon publish my article and it will be with the full support of everybody because I used the discussion page of Bosendorfer. You then contacted Andrew Norman to block me to prevent me from editing the Bosendorfer discussion page and then you thought you could keep me away on my own user page with the intention of blocking me indefinitively. When you blocked me indefinitively through RobertG, you knew too well that no one could read my user page afterward! That is what I believe you did! And it is probably easily verifiable by people at Wikipedia. Now, what is your role at Wikipedia? You are not an administrator; otherwise you would have blocked me yourself directly! Anyway, I propose to carry on the discussion on the Bosendorfer discussion page concerning my article. I am ready to change sentences that cause problems. It is just up to you to mention these problematic sentences on this Bosendorfer discussion page and if you have a valid reason to have this sentence changed, it will be changed. I am not a fanatic and I am ready to please people. I will use logic and reason to assess a request to change sentences, not emotions. If I do not want to change a sentence, I will say clearly why and we could discuss further on this refusal to accept a change if it happens. And I will answer the points you raised in your previous postings, Mütze. So, I hope you will behave a little bit more relaxed about what I intend to do. The goal: publish a good article on a good product that inform people who read it. Apparently, for the time being, mostly the group of administrators and their friends (!!) who are the only ones who complained about my article so far. But to have had to go through such a nightmare just to want to publish a good article on Wikipedia is surely not the right way to do at Wikipedia with people who are ready to contribute positively!! You are really going to put people off wanting to write on Wikipedia! And I especially target the administrators who have been in contact with me in a very aggressive way. Just a few days ago, I did not even know that what an administrator was at Wikipedia! Here is what Jimbo Wales says on his user page: ``Newcomers are always to be welcomed. There must be no cabal, there must be no elites, there must be no hierarchy or structure which gets in the way of this openness to newcomers.``. If he knews what I had to go through and the very aggressive behaviour I experienced from administrators at Wikipedia, he would not be very pleased. What I say above, he call it one of his main principles! So, administrators, when you contact people, make sure you remember this very core principle of one of the founders of Wikipedia and target the true vandals instead of people like me who are willing to add a good article to Wikipedia! Jimbo Wales wants people to write as many articles as possible on Wikipedia. Your role as administrators is to help and encourage them to do so instead of trying to block them indefinitively! So, I hope you can now all relax and not get emotional or upset on this coming article. I follow the process used by Wikipedia to deal with an article that causes opposition. See the new comments now on the Bosendorfer discussion page and state the sentences that cause you problems and especially why these sentences are problematic. Then, I will do my best to change them to please everybody. MichaelIsGreat`

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

59,921,726

Huh? Didn't understand what you're asking sorry...

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

59,928,924

:Absolutely fabulous! Now what do I do with it? Do I have to get it approved or anything? You're really special! Thanks a lot!

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

59,929,281

And I believe you're being an arse, but hey, I cope....

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

true

59,929,753

::Thanks a bunch! You're awesome!...

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

59,930,274

==To Mütze== To Mütze, I ask you to contact RobertG and to ask him to unblock me because there is no valid reasons to have blocked me in the first place. RobertG let his emotions take control of his behaviour when facts should have been his way of assessing his decision! There is not a single fact against me that warrants blocking me indefinitely. In any case, I will contact the founders of Wikipedia about your shameful behaviour. MichaelIsGreat

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

59,931,165

Oh, I hope this is right: Wikipedia:Other awards/Wikiproject.. And I also hope you don't mind that I credited you too. Thanks again, & if you need anything, (you probably wont cause you're soo much better at barnstars than me), then don't hesitate to ask...

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

59,932,297

== Testing, testing, 1 2 3.... == , give the first new Dinosaur Barnstar to Sheepy for his edits to the subject, .]] Thought I'd test out the new barnstar Sango created for us from my idea. Hope you like it & put it above Firsfron's cause his isn't as pretty, & this is the first of these ever given out... Have fun...

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

59,934,235

==Tactics= What were the tactics in this war? Did the Vietnamese fight the Chinese in the same way they fought the Americans? Did the Chinese try to use a different approach than the U.S. did in fighting this war?

2,006

false

article

blocked

test

false

59,938,997

==Rockabilly== I have downloaded and listened to Johnny Rebel and that is not rockabilly music. Rockabilly is typified by steel-stringed acoustic electric guitar, slap bass, and echochambered vocals. Of these the only possible elements that could apply is steel-stringed acoustic electric guitar. As such I removed the rockabilly artist categorization.

2,006

false

article

random

train

false

59,940,745

== This guy... == sucks kobe's nuts: http://youtube.com/watch?v=LtqFB0ji358&search;=kobe%20dunks%20on%20shaq

2,006

false

article

random

train

true

59,944,795

The article itself states that Arabs make up a small part of the population of Bay Ridge, yet someone gave it it's own section...if you're going to do that then you need to write a section on the Irish, Norwegian, Italian, and Greeks of the neighborhood as well.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

59,955,795

Viral is a faggot mother fucker in the shit of the crap stritting.

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

true

59,958,507

== You need a life == REALLY BAD.......................BITCH!

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

true

59,969,603

How the F am I vandalising? Where am I vandalising?

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

59,969,810

`::``your comments only support the inherent racism of Anglo-Celtic Australians``... I stated that lebanese were targeted and, hence, it was lebanese who retaliated... ie, no one retaliates on beahlf of some other group- at Punchbowl park where NSW Police observed the ``conveys`` which raided society, on the road graffiti on the road stated ``LIONS OF LEBANON`` - THERE``S YOU``RE EVIDENCE - if reason and logic are ``racism`` then it explians why you Leftists cannot think at all - where were your comments when a young Australian girl was raped because she was Australian... you were silent, so don't know say one word now... `

2,006

false

article

blocked

test

false

59,970,395

` your interpretation of the above words does not make it a ``personal attack`` it is what is in you that makes you interpret it in that way... I am the author of it, and, hence, i know what i meant... ````Take any action allow=d to be vicious: Wilful murder, for instance. Examine it in all lights, and see if you can find that matter of fact, or real existence, which you call vice. In which-ever way you take it you find only certain passions, motives, volitions and thoughts. There is no other matter of fact in the case. The vice entirely escapes you, as long as you consider the object. You never can find it, till you turn your reflexion into your own breast, and find a sentiment of disapprobation, which arises in you, towards this action. Here is a matter of fact; but >tis the object of feeling, not of reason.```` HUME -`

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

59,972,201

` for example, if i were to say that you are ``defficient in the immoral`` then to you it is not a personl attack as you consider that to be good, but if i menat it to be an attack, then it is... it is your inner setiment that dictates the way you interpret it as good or as bad... but it is not in the thing itself, or what i menat it to be... open your eyes to reality and wake up from your conditioned sleep ;) read above, what is it to be moral anyway? you fool - maybe it is good to be a fool, but if you think it is not, then that is youre propblem ;) i cant be held accountable for your inner interpretatons and psychology ;)`

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

59,972,417

No way, I removed them.

2,006

false

article

random

train

false

59,975,234

::No sweat dude. I probably deserved it... ;)

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

59,979,396

`I am sorry, but the situation is far from resolved for me. The bottom line is that I assume that there is actually some sort of process that must be followed before a single individual can simply ban me from correcting the systematic bias of another editor. Has been cautioned regarding his systematic bias, or his wild accusations against all who oppose him? What about the admin protecting pages, without placing protection notices on them, for ``wikistalking``, when he edits in concert with IronDuke on various anti-Arab pages? I stopped editing only because of your threat of a ban, but the pages in questions: Portland Seven and related pages are still the subject of IronDuke's anti-Arab POV. Simply ``asking another admin`` an unnamed one, at an unscheduled future date to ``look into`` does not really answer my question regarding an appeal process. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

59,979,646

== Applicability to Wikipedia == To what degree (if any) does this apply to Wikipedia? (This may not be the right place to ask, but I don't know where else). AFAIK, Wikipedia does not ask for a birthdate, and it does contain information that might fall under the descriptions included. Does anyone know?

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

59,981,718

Vampires being strong comes from folklore so leave it alone please.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

59,986,638

` which do not even have an online edition, let alone something that is accesible for paid useers. Any way, I will try to give some references (from standard books) while updating the article in future == First clinical syndrome == About your article First Clinical Syndrome, I have changed it to a redirect to the article medical student syndrome. Medical student syndrome is a much more commonly used term, and the phenomenon is a global one. Therefore, there shouldn't be different articles for the same term in regional dialects of English. You are free to add more to medical student syndrome. I couldn't find anything in your article to merge, however. :I've reverted that. See talk:medical student syndrome. == Ayyavazhi and Duryodhana == While there is nothing wrong in mentioning Duryodhana in the Ayyavazhi articles, it is not appropriate to insert it in the main Duryodhana article. Ayyavazhi is not notable enough to be mentioned there and in a number of places. It is the same as including Ayyavazhi in the Menstrual cycle article (see ). There is nothing wrong creating dozens of Ayyavazhi articles, but it is wrong creating links from every possible location on WP. - ===Ayyavazhi=== When you have * 13.1 Buddhism on menstruation * 13.2 Christianity on menstruation * 13.3 Hinduism on menstruation * 13.4 Islam on menstruation * 13.5 Judaism on menstruation * 13.6 Sikhism on menstruation * 13.7 Tribal societies and menstruation * 13.8 Mysticism What is wrong in Having Ayyavazhi on Menstraution Please note that I am not a follower of that religion, but I feel that we don't have any right to deny an existence of a religion. When you permit Tribal societies and Mysticism, I feel that Ayyavazhi has a place. This is my opinion. Please correct me if I am wrong. I want a discussion and not argument Similarly, I feel that it should be included in the list of religions also :Hi! All the religions you mention about are a million times more notable than Ayyavazhi. Ayyavazhi is not even a recognised religion in India. Wikipedia has a Notability guideline which prevents us from doing precicely this. There a literally thousands of minor religions in this world, and all of them probably have an opinion on menstruation. What will happen if all these thousands of religions want mention in that article? We are compiling an encyclopedia, not a world fact book.Tribal societies and mysticism are generalised sections in that article which give an overview of the practices. Ayyavazhi with its miniscule followers does not belong in that article. - ===Duryodhana=== When you are mentioning ``In Kumaon region of Uttranchal`` in the page of Duryodhana and not limiting to mention Duryodhana in Kumaon (for example), I think the same logic should be followed for Ayyavazhi also Again this is MY opinion and I would like to see a consensus Please correct me if I am wrong. I want a discussion and not an argument The following copied from - ===Recognition=== With reference to your comment on my talk page that ``Ayyavazhi is not even a recognised religion in India``, Sorry for my ignorance. What is a ``recognised religion`` in India By the way, my district collector (meaning State Govt) declares an holiday on one of their festivals Any how, my simple question is that ``Just because we are not aware of something, it is justified that we oppose articles about it in Wikipedia`` Again this is MY opinion and I would like to see a consensus I suppose the census data is one of the things that distinguish a 'recognised' relegion. This page contains the data from the 2001 census and a spreadsheet which contains state-wise data. The data from Tamil Nadu has the number of Hindus, Christians, Muslims, Sikhs, Jains, Budhists, Others and Relegion not stated. There are 54985079 Hindus, 7252 'others' and 59344 who have not stated their relegion. Obviously, the government has not counted Ayyavazhi as a seperate relegion. The government in 2001 may not have counted Ayyavazhi as a seperate religion. But the same government declares an occasion as Gazetted Holiday in 2006 (for the first time). Does it tell you something. If there is a change in 2006, why not we accept that ::When did TN government's vote grabbing attempts become equivalant to official recognition?! BTW the holiday was declared in a couple of districts of TN, and not for whole state. Does this make Ayyavazhi notable enough to include in a encyclopediaic summary article of a bodily function? I don't think so - :::To answer your question ``If we are not aware of something, does it justify opposing it?`` - Of course it does. That is how WP evolves - through negotiations and challenges and verifiability. If the subject is proven to be verifiable then it is allowed to exist by the community. Ayyavazhi in my opinion has utterly failed in the notability and verifiability criteria. Going by your argument anyone can create any article on any subject and use your argument to justify its existence. It will totally undermine WP's reliability as a source. - :::I think you have totally misunderstood my reply. I said WP evolves and grows based on challenges and skepticism by the WP community. We don't (shouldn't) anything at face value. The most imortant criteria in Wikipedia is its Verifiability. For example, if I create an article on, say, a species of three eyed monkey, and base the article solely on my having seen the monkey, it will be challenged and deleted from WP. Notability and verifiability demands that any subject documented should be (a) verifiable - ie should be independently documented from a neutral point of view by a reliable third party, meaning I can't one of my friends to create a website on the three-eyed monkey and cite that website as reference in my WP article, and (b) Notable - ie should be relatively well know beyond a select group of people. In this example, I can't claim notability for the three-eyed monkey just because myself and a friend of mine have seen it. :::If an article is questioned based on the notability and verifiability criteria, it is not because the article is untrue, but it just means it is not a suitable WP article. An encyclopedia does not contain unverified information, nor does it contain original research. :::I am not familiar with your problems with the article Medical School but it does show that WP works. There is a conversation happening and a compromise will be reached. :::Coming to the Ayyavazhi issue, I have nothing against the faith itself or its followers. My only issue was the way had inserted Ayyavazhi is places it does not belong. There is no reason an obscure faith such as Ayyavazhi should be listed on par with the world's major religions. :::- See this discussion. The same user had gone and created hundreds of links on pages with no apparent connection with Ayyavazhi. The List of religions page perhaps warrents a mention os Ayyavazhi, that is why I agreed to leave it there. But See and and even the . I think this is a blatent attempts of evangelical zeal that does not have a place in WP - ::::What I meant by When did TN government's vote grabbing attempts become equivalant to official recognition? was was this the first time TN government try to get the votes of a minority group. Obviously there are quite a few followers of Ayyavazhi in the districts mentioned, although they may think themselves as non-hindus. Declaring a holiday IMO is a way of pandering to this group. - :::::Let's not go into all that. Yes, Ayyavazhi merits a place in List of Religions, but not in summary articles like Menstrual Cycle etc., at least not yet. Let us try to add valid references from among those suggested by Vaikunda Raja at Talk:History of Tamil Nadu. I'd suggest that they publish more on this subject in peer-reviewed conferences and journals and then add relevant references here. Because, Wikipedia is not a place for submitting primary research

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

59,994,798

` (UTC) == Asian Racial origins of the Slavs == Similar to Alfred Rosenberg's claims of peoples of Southern Europe descended from Africans, Semites and Moors, the peoples of Eastern Europe were alleged to have Mongolian blood. Anyone who studied this segment of world history knew the Mongols invaded (western) Russia in the late 13th century (1200s) and they remained there in Siberian Russia until the early 1500s. The 'untermenschen' claim included in many statements of the Nazis, like Alfred Rosenberg's use of the pejorative term ``Tatars`` or Turkic-Altaic races of Northwest Asia to describe Slavs, also mentioned Russians and other Slavs are inbred from Asian ``Mongolian`` blood. Most Russians in the western edges of the country have small amounts of non-Caucasoid blood, but the majority of native Asians whom intermarried the Russians/Slavs live in the enormously large country's Central and East parts, or Siberia. The commonly anti-Semitic and racial (if not based on religious differences) views on Russians and Slavs are under ``Jew control`` is odious and false, then to add any Jewish roots in the general Slavic population is part of the Nazis' ``untermenschen`` agenda. I wonder there's a farther addition to nationalist rhetoric on the Slavs are ``blood relatives`` of the Chinese, Japanese, Oriental/East Asians, etc. when anthropology disprove most Nazi ideologue on the Slavs' Asian-Mongolian origins. Anthropology was able to determine an actual link with Polynesians and Native Americans share genetic and physiological connections with North or East Asians or ``Mongolians``, although the split of these ``races`` took place over 10,000 years ago. But there's no such scientific claim on the prototype Caucasian Slavs are part of the ``Oriental Asian/Sino-Mongolian`` race was completed, unless a much larger European element diluted remnants of the Mongolian era (or their genes) after the 1500s, before the Russians' expansion to the east (Siberia and North Asia). It's the same logic applied to whether or not a high frequency of Arabic, Moorish or African genes exist in the Spanish and Italian peoples, still a theory or those genes nearly vanished over time. + 13:43, 22 June 2006`

2,006

false

article

random

train

false

59,998,973

== Added buddhist group and made list alphabetical. == I added the budhist group following several news reports on the sacking of the CWC centre. I know that budhists claim non violence however so do most religous groups. I made the list alphabetical to avoid claims of bias

2,006

false

article

random

test

false

60,002,867

` ::::Yes it most definitely does. But burger from hamburger (as the article states) most definitely doesn't. `

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

60,008,479

:Do they own it? You know, going to a realtor, paying a down-payment and closing costs. Probably not. It's not theirs. A movement? Whatever. Take the pillow from your head and put a book in it! - KRS-ONE MEGA

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

60,009,144

I really don't have a clue what you are talking about. The only edits I made speculating about naming nomenclature were to an article about the name of a german synogogue.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

60,009,587

==LUL== Ok i will remove the images if they are presumed copyrighted. Apologies in the meen time.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

60,010,542

::Perhaps :::Wilhelmstrasse (Wilhelmstraße in Germany: see ß) ::is better. Stemonitis, is of course right that it is not only in Germany where this street name is Wilhelmstraße, but that might be a bit beside the point because in fact this street is in Germany so we should not need to mention how the name is written in Austria, say, in the lead. Again, this is not a terribly big point but I certainly think the ß link is useful.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

60,029,333

` ==No problem== I thought you'd up and left the Wiki, but I guess not! Thursday, June 22, 2006, 17:44 (UTC) `

2,006

false

user

random

dev

false

60,029,435

== getting pics into the commons == I can't figure out how to get my images listed in the U of L commons. Also, (this is embarrasing) how does one sign the edit summary with the arrow and section name?

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

60,031,210

ANN COULTER IS A NO GOOD FUCKING CUNT AND SHE IS GOING TO HELL ALONMG SIDE WITH THE FUCK HEAD GEORGE W. BUSH!!! THE THE GOP!!! THE RIGHT = RICH OLD ASS WHO HATE THE POOR PEOPLE AND WANT MORE!!!

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

true

60,038,276

== User page andalism revert == Appreciated. Thanks

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

60,042,140

I would like for images I uploaded related to the University of Louisville, as Image:Softball06.JPG,, to be come up in the wikimedia U of L commons. I have tryed adding the images with the cat. U of Lou., but they still don't show up. As for the 'arrow and name' thing, I finally found out it is by /* */

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

60,042,904

` == For those who have a care and can think for themselves == As a Wikipedian and American citizen it is my privilege and right to learn. It is my pleasure to know what the truth is, or at least question what we take for granted. First of all we have to understand how the U.S. works; understand the messes we get ouselves in. * The U.S. is probably the largest terrorist supporting nation in the entire world(i.e. through the NYSE and CIA drug trafficking, which are very closely related). * The U.S. put Saddam in power after the first Gulf War. * The CIA trained, funded, and provided the Taliban with weapons. * 9/11 is probably the most misplaced event in regards to the President's many Iraq war discussions and comments * The attacks on 9/11 still remain a mystery today. Not to mention, ``smart`` investors made million of dollars on put-options through the NYSE (i.e. the put-options were made on Boeing Co. and the insurance companies the World Trade towers were insured on). * The FBI still holds vast amounts of evidence that was taken from the various 9/11 attacks form the World Trade towers to the attack on the pentagon. * Several newspapers and others media from other countries (e.g. Israel and India) knew many weeks in advance about the 9/11 attacks. * The real reason we are in Iraq still is a mystery and that is why it is heavily debated and questioned My suggestion is continue to question what the media of our nation tells us. I also would like to suggest a few good sources of information, which many authorities and officials would lay to claim as ``crackpot`` theories and conspiracies. Despite the fact that if the questions regarding 9/11, Iraq, terrorism, CIA drug trafficking, and the U.S. government in general, then there would be no conspiracy. Open your eyes to a few good experiences: Documentaries: 911 Loose Change 2nd Edition[121] and Truth and Lies of 9/11[122] Books: Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Center Disaster The Five Unanswered Questions About 9/11 and The New Pearl Harbor Websites: www.fromthewilderness.com www.conspiracyplanet.com www.911truth.org www.911blogger.com And there are millions more. Just get out there and you will discover a whole different view. Above all let this be an addition to your knowledge and views so that you may embrace a more worldly view and a more accurate idea of our existence. Remember after you have dug deep enough ask yourselve these questions, ``Why are we in Iraq, what is the idea of spreading ``democracy`` in the Middle-East, and finally is the Iraq war really a ``war on terrorism``? I will save all the time of looking for yourself...the reason why we are in Iraq is geostrategy and obvious imperialistic ambtions...the idea of ``democracy`` and ``war on terrorism`` is most definitely flawed, it's money the U.S. is after. After all, the U.S. thrives on terrorism and exploitation of third world countries, that's global economy, that's global super-power, that's the U.S. That is not what I stand for and I hope you have the ability to stand for you rights and ideas. Don't sit back and watch all this happen and ignore others' ideas or opinions, that would be ignorant and unintelligent, act for your freedom and the freedom of others (i.e. what democracy is).Existential Thinker`

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

60,045,373

:I try just typing the section name and it doesn't do it. As for the pictures, who is best to ask about the media commons problem?

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

60,048,237

` ==Scientology?== When Panda first rolled out its antivirus service, people were buzzing about it being either owned or produced by strict Scientologists. Any truth here? If so it definitely this certainly merits noting in the article (as a matter of ``the whole truth`` and public safety). Also, if this question is edited out without comment, you can expect to blow some whistles. `

2,006

false

article

random

dev

false

60,048,791

`For the record, I mean nothing very special or unusual by ``rational discussion`` and Xed's personal attacks are nothing new. I do not expect nor ask for people to be loyal to me, at all times or otherwise. Xed knows this; he is hoping that others do not. `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

60,049,548

` You may do that if you want to and I suggest that you add some more blocking hours because he actually is a cyber clown, like yourself: There do not exist many MGRs but only one single MGR which with the exception of a few people at the University of Munich and at some other places. So, how can you, grandfather Zens and cyper clown Philosophus say that it had all the time beem ignored? Are you both not quite right in your heads? By the way, is in the Encyclopaedia Britannica, for instance, written that these four journals are ``looked at with suspicion``? I must say to you, Zens, that you are an entirely immature boy who even seems not to be aware of the legal relevance of writing about other journals in this degrading style. Who do you think you are? For any of these journals an editorial staff of some dozens of scientists and physics teachers works, and great Zens and Jcobinus Magnus look al all these pursons with suspicion! I think the first thing you should do here is that you both first formally apologize to the editors-in-chief if these four journals. If you don't do it then fuck off and do not bother me any more with our silly and idiotic questions. Everything clear, you fools? KraMuc, 22 June 2006.`

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

60,049,629

` :: Firstly, it isn't up to me to do your research for you. It's your information that you seem determined to insert prominently near the top of the article, so the burden is on you to provide proper cited sources for it. I already made my contribution: I prefer to just jettison the entire paragraph, as I already did, or at least move it somewhere much lower in the article. Secondly, some of the stuff you just mentioned are still various rock critics giving their own opinions of ``obvious`` influences. To say ``Coldplay is influenced by Oasis``, we need a source with an actual band member stating words to this effect. Thirdly, why is it so important to you to devote so much time, space, and effort to Coldplay's influences, and why is it important enough to be so near the top of the article? `

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

60,050,714

for your bad behaviour

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

60,053,521

== Innocent of the Accusings of the Crapholeistan Government! == Do not accuse me! I am always the truths be TELLING! Highest authorities! Sincerement: Joergen, d/b/a VERITOLOGIST I Thanks You!

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

60,053,764

:Way to not even read the edit I made, smart one.

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

60,054,864

Stop vandalizing Wikipedia.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

60,055,238

Stop vandalizing the Byrchall High School page.

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

60,060,354

Sorry! Won't happen again! - 22 June 2006 03:58 pm.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

60,062,626

:::The thing is... :::Flags out: neutral to non Spanish viewers because flags don't mean anything to them, BUT NOT neutral to a large part of Spanish viewers because it shows a false, fabricated unicultural vision of Spain, the unitary vision of Spain is a right wing view and a clear residue of Franco's cultural genocide between 1939 and 1975, as much as Wikifrikiuser tries to obviate it. :::Flags in: it represents a point of view that will not mind non Spanish users as they don't know what they are, and it represents a neutral and real multicultural point of view for Spanish viewers, not a biased and fabricated one as what some people here are trying to impose. :::Conclusion: Flags in shouldn't offend anyone because it's the real thing, flags out offend as it's a lack of respect and authoritarism for supressing the reality

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

60,063,453

Personal experience of what may be no more than one group of regular returnees is not factual evidence of all travellers. My personal experience has been mostly of well-mannered, albeit rough round the edges types who treated me with a great deal of respect, however I accept that's not the same in every case, and would not put it down as fact for all travellers.

2,006

false

article

random

train

false

60,064,228

Hi Alpachimp, Have you any friends? Best Wishes, Hernan Crespo

2,006

false

user

blocked

test

false

60,064,296

I don't think so Hernan. Cheers, Lionel Messi

2,006

false

user

blocked

dev

false

60,064,399

Well played the other day. Yeah, that Alphachimp definitely has no friends. Regards, Juan Pablo Sorin

2,006

false

user

blocked

dev

false

60,064,586

He does have a few friends, but no friends on the Argentine World Cup squad 2006. Many Thanks, Javier Saviola

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

60,064,732

We were all quite friendly with him in the 2002 World Cup squad, but we slightly blamed him for going out at the first round. Yours, Gabriel Batistuta

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

60,065,271

Good stuff. Do you think the way the book is used in the article can be attributed to good faith error, or intentional misrepresentation?

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

60,065,460

get out my large penis

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

true

60,076,123

` == Speedy deletion == Regarding the article Image:466px-Hurricane Dennis.jpg, which you tagged for speedy deletion with the reason ``This image is a redundant (all pixels the same or scaled down) copy of Image:Hurricane Dennis on July 7 2005 1550 UTC.jpg, in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not Commons), and all inward links have been updated (CSD I1)``, I wanted you to know that I have removed the speedy deletion tag. This article does not qualify for speedy deletion because this is not correct, the other image you quoted is on Commons. If you still want the article to be deleted, please use the WP:IFD process. Thanks! `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

60,078,563

== Jaime Foxx Show == Did Kandi Burruss play on the Jaime Foxx show for awhile?

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

60,078,649

*Jimmy is based on Geri Jewell from the Facts of Life. Phoenix Frou

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

60,079,827

I would but it wouldn't matter if I got a link to a website that has a video of John Cena declaring his love for cartoons and announcing he wants to play Dave The Barbarian in a live action movie. Lil crazy thing WILL delete it and say it's not a reliable source or it doesn't matter. She doesn't want me contributing.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

60,080,592

== Collaboration == Hi Jayant. Let me unconfuse you about the whole collaboration thingy. It basically works like the Article Improvement Drive, where people vote for an article they really really want edited. You can still edit other articles, & you don't even have to edit the article nominated, but it just helps focus the group's attention at improving a single article. So continue editing as you were, & feel free to vote or edit the nominated article. Thanks,

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

60,081,418

::::: It's not enough to strenghten a notion. If an editor is misrepresenting text here, that's a serious matter, and should be dealt with.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

60,085,629

== Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Velociraptor == Fixed one of your requests. Working on the other... Thanks,

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

60,085,721

` ``It's all in the family as lawmakers hire``], AP, April 15, 2006.`

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

60,085,801

== Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Velociraptor == Fixed your request. I hope you will be able to support now. Thanks,

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

60,086,077

== Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Velociraptor == Fixed one of your requests on the article, also commented to the rest. Would like to here from you. Thanks,

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

60,086,449

` == Manners And Etiquette == Thaey are the same thing, no?GorillazFan `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

60,088,694

`Thank you for experimenting with the page Wikipedia talk:Searching on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. e `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

60,089,450

, showing the relationship inline in both

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

60,098,185

*Support. I have also elsewhere represented the interpretation that firstname + ordinal + of + country is suitable naming format for quite a many sovereign monarchs, irrespective of the technical title usually or somehow applied (possibly retrospectively) to that monarchy. Here, the interpretation fits well, and we avoid potential move wars whether the guy was Prince-Bishop, Prince, Vladika or Prince-Vladika or should any of those actually be translated in some other way.

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

60,098,840

::::: In case you missed what I said earlier, I don't even think the paragraph should BE in the article, therefore I am not going to contribute to its sourcing and its existence. I'm already compromising with you by trying to clean it up. If it MUST be there, at least let it done properly. I am not going to argue about this any further.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

60,099,664

`to say that there is an ``inherent racism of Anglo-Celtic Australians`` is racist in itself, or at least a personal attack - and if I respond to that racist statement, then I am refered to a ``no personal attack policy`` - its always the same with the Leftists... people are terrorised in society, hassled, intimidatd, threatened, hated, raped all because of an underlying racism for infidels and Australians, and no one says a word, but then some people respond and throw some bottles, and all the Leftists come out of the wood work - Anglo saxons are not raping on racial lines... are not stabbing people in the back at 16th birthday parties, not dirve by shooting in the West etc I have a SOURCE for you... it comes form the article itself... ````they encountered carloads of men with Lebanese flags hanging out the windows and heard one man screaming, ``Do it for Allah!```` I don't suppose that sounds like the vietnamese, italians, or jews - all of which have managed to 'fit; into Australian society, keeping their beautiful cultures strong for a multicultural Australia, but have not raped an ``Aussie slut`` because she ``deserves it because she is Asutralian`` to date... ;) I love Indonesian Muslims in Lombock, so im not against muslims... I love lebanses christians... so im not racist towards middle easterns and im not against lebanese, I am merely against a Lebanese muslim CULTURE... ``culture`` is the key word... its not about some Ayrians supperiority, or genetics, its about a mere conduct of people that i find abhorant and asocial... the culture of rape is linked to the islamic sheikes who preach ``strappless backless`` cluts are targets for rape... i don;t happen to like that culture... DO YOU?? `

2,006

false

article

blocked

dev

false

60,101,579

` :::::: Who is saying ``other approaches have an equivalent scientific pedigree to twin studies``? You said that, not I, and neither does the article. Therefore i am not obliged to justify their merits, nor am interested in spelling out the alternatives, as i (personally) do not think the section reqires such detail. Its simply important (in my opinion) to illustrate that twin studies are not the exclusive tool which scientists have used to find these suggestive associations. They may be the best, they may be the most common, but they are not exclusive. That is clear from the sources i provided. ::::::Let me explain to you what happened. Without justification, Cesar deleted the bold text from this section: ::The reasons offered for the relative lack of genetic understanding is because the links between genes and mental states defined as abnormal appear highly complex, involve extensive environmental influences and can be mediated in numerous different ways, for example by personality, temperament or life events. Therefore while twin studies and other research suggests that personality is heritable to some extent, the genetic basis for particular personality or temperament traits, and their links to mental health problems, is currently unclear :::::: I replaced it because it is a more accurate, and informative, reflection of reality with it in. You questioned why. So I provided references. One of these references says the following (my bold): :: Twin studies show that co-morbidity within anxiety disorders and between anxiety disorders and depression is explained by a shared genetic vulnerability for both disorders. Some family studies support this conclusion, but others suggest that co-morbidity is due to one disorder being an epiphenomenon of the other. :::::: Now, please tell me why the above reference, specifically the words in bold, is not an appropriate source for the assertion that i reverted? That is all i did and that is all i am interested in discussing. Should you feel you can further improve this section by rewording, then please do so. But please do not continue to infer greater meaning behind this very simple and justifiable edit. A little good faith would not go amiss. Thank you. e `

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

60,102,363

Thank you for experimenting with the page Captain Beefheart on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. — @

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

60,105,411

It doesn't matter whether you or I know it.

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

60,107,855

` *actually, I was ``vandalizing`` an article tagged as clear patent nonsense, instead of blocking me, you could be deleting ``Buddha Khan``, but instead you pick on the poor AOL user `

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

60,107,908

The article in general just needs to be cleaned up and written from an encyclopedic POV.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

60,109,753

` == Steven E. Jones == in response to please stop deleting tags at will. Those tags were originally chosen by Morton devonshire, who made the following change first. Anyone making such a change should not be editing wikipedia. Your own comments (``conspiracy theorist``) is harrassment and not professional. Using that term shows that you are not taking the issue seriously. Therefore, you should not be editing these 9/11 pages. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false