dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
60,370,853	I've done that lots only to have you revert me. This is not a legitimate block..	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
60,371,719	You review it and maybe you will get a clue. I think you are vindictive and petty. You might as well stay out of my page.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
60,375,136	==Culture== Thanks, OK, sounds good. I throw things, then take things out.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
60,376,311	==How proud I am to be a Greek!== I am a Greek Nationalist this is nothing to be ashamed of, I believe in fascism and a strong leader, and let me first say that I despise Turks, I have changed the image section to include what I believe is a wider variety of great Greeks from the ages. I really wanted to include Constantine XI or other Byzantine but I couldn't. Perhaps we can work something out?	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
60,377,330	== Copy == So did we copy the article from this page, or did they copy from us?	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
60,378,474	`Please do not remove content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. e `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
60,378,675	England to win the world cup	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
60,379,531	:Pictures were taken from the Greek Ministry of Culture website, as explained already. They are open to the public domain.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
60,380,898	== Nomination == I've nominated this for GA status. Personally, I think it isn't quite there yet, although it arguably meets all criteria. The lack of images is because, as far as I am aware there are no non-copyrighted photos of the bird. I was a little worried about the section stubs, but Great Barrier Reef has passed as a GA with section stubs, so ... Over to you, independent reviewer.	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
60,381,099	:::How do I go about doing that? Ministry of Culture pictures are in the public domain, that is easy to prove, but how do I prove that they are the Ministry's own images? Why would they release them into the public domain if they were not Greek Ministry pictures?	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
60,381,451	` All I can find with relative to the latter are this: Collection of material, writing, editing of texts: Pigi Kalogerakou, Aspasia Michanou, Dimitris Mylonas, Andreas Vlachopoulos Texts were written by - the Ephorates of Antiquities and Monuments of the Ministry for the section ``Cultural Heritage`` - the services of the Ministry and the cultural organisations and institutes involved for the section ``Modern and Contemporary Cultural Creation`` - Prof. Chrysanthos Christou, Member of the Athens Academy for the introduction to ``Visual Arts in Modern Greece`` - Kostas Georgousopoulos, philologist and theatre critic, for the introduction to ``Theatre in Greece`` - the services of the Ministry for the sections ``Great Projects of the Ministry``, ``Special Issues`` and ``Selected Cultural Events`` Source: http://www.culture.gr/`	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
60,382,409	I wasn't even going to answer, but no, I will not apologize because I didn't even make any attack. I made a point of trying to make it clear that I wasn't attacking you when I was referring to the disinfo campaigns and such. I said that it wasn't right of me to speak for you and that you can speak for yourself. I even tried to be sensitive about it when I was giving CB Brooklyn the info and the articles, but even that isn't enough for you. And I never gave any information that Mongo didn't give himself. You simply don't want the subject mentioned even when it's pertinent to the conversation, or it's starting to look now like especially when it's pertinent to the conversation. This block is totally illegitimate and I know that is the case. Mongo can call me a loonie, say that people should put in padded cells, straight jackets, then I get blocked for the conversation at Talk:Collapse of the World Trade Center? This must be my figurative padded cell. Innuendo? Big deal. This is all BS is what this is. Thanks for blocking me Mongo, you are giving everyone another great demonstration. I will take responsibility for having brought it up. What do you think Tom? What do you think is right?	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	true
60,391,366	` Whatever, the original disambig. line was more accurate - ``''This article describes the historical development of the estimation of the age of the Earth, concentrating on scientific dating methods...`` - that's what the article does - including a short sentence on pre science methods. But the change ``this article details scientific methods..`` is not as accurate. User:Stevertigo's edit 'this article focusses on scientific methods`` is better than the current state. I don't know exactly why it was changed since it 'wasn't broke' before - now it's not as good for apparently the sake of being one line shorter. That's no good. I'd like to just change it back. `	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
60,399,500	== a gentle warning == By now it should be evident to you that many other editors are watching the Billy Joel article, and that all the time you spend trying to remove joelfan.com and switch it with your own spam link is wasted effort. Wikipedia operates by consensus, and the consensus is clearly against you.	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
60,402,710	2006 :All tags are off as of right now! 05:51 PM, 24 June	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
60,406,736	:: Well we all know what your taste is like from your bigoted comment above.	2,006	false	article	blocked	dev	false
60,420,132	`At the bottom it lists different Wyoming cities. One of these reads ``Bristol`` and links to ``Bristol, RI. Why????? `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
60,429,761	::::I didn't see a need to quote him. I thought the link to the transcript was just fine as long as the summary did not make it appear as if he opposed the H-1B completely as compared to abuses of it. LordPathogen	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
60,436,523	` == The Truth about the 1986 Sinn Féin Ard Fheis and the Unbroken Continuity of Sinn Féin Poblachtach since 1905 == The story of how Gerry Adams tried to turn an eighty year old revolutionary movement into a British Constitutional party. How he broke the Sinn Féin constitution, created fake cumainn to give him fake votes and barred life long republicans from voting. How he managed to expel himself and his supporters from Sinn Féin membership. And, how a small band of republicans managed to keep the Sinn Féin constitution and traditional policy in tact. In 1986 Section 1b. of the Sinn Féin constitution read as follows: “No person who is a member of any political party organisation or who approves of or supports the candidature of persons who, if elected, intend taking part in the proceedings of the Westminster or partitionist 26-County or 6-County parliaments or who approves of or supports the candidature of persons who sign any form or give any kind of written or verbal undertaking of intention to take their seats in these institutions, shall be admitted to membership or allowed to retain membership.`` The Adams leadership put forward a motion, titled Resolution 162, at the 1986 Ard Fheis. Its wording was as follows: RESOLUTION 162 THAT this Ard-Fheis drops its abstentionist attitude to Leinster House. Successful Sinn Fein parliamentary candidates in 26-County elections: a. Shall attend Leinster House as directed by the Ard Chomhairle. b. Shall not draw their salaries for personal use. (Parliamentary representatives shall be paid a Sinn Fein organiser’s subsidy, and the Leinster House salary shall be divided at the direction of the Ard Chomhairle to defray national and constituency expenses.) To accommodate this change, the Constitution and Rules be amended as follows: That Section 1b of the Constitution be amended to read: No person who is a member of any political party organisation or who approves of or supports the candidature of persons who, if elected, intend taking part in the proceedings of the Westminster or partitionist 6-County parliaments or who approves of or supports the candidature of persons who sign any form or give any kind of written or verbal undertaking of intention to take their seats in these institutions, shall be admitted to membership or allowed to retain membership. Motion 162 supports and approves of the candidature of persons who, if elected, would be of the intention to take their seats in certain circumstances i.e. on the direction of the Ard Chomhairle. Obviously, Motion 162 infringes Section 1b. Section 1b. was in effect at the time this Resolution was presented. Its clear that Adams made a mistake in procedure. He should have sought a majority decision to amend Section 1b. in 1986 and returned in 1987 to propose entering Leinster House. Trying to amend Section 1b. and propose taking seats in the “partitionist 26-County Parliament” in the same Resolution was a logical impossibility. Can anybody say that the wording: “That this Ard-Fheis drops its abstentionist attitude to Leinster House. Successful Sinn Fein parliamentary candidates in 26-County elections: a. Shall attend Leinster House as directed by the Ard Chomhairle” does not constitute the supporting and approving of the candidature of persons who intend to take their seats in Leinster House as directed by the Ard Chomhairle? Clearly Adams was in breach of Section 1b. and according to that section he had expelled himself, and all those who voted for Resolution 162. Brian Feeney, in his book, Sinn Féin 100 Turbulent Years, puts forward the argument that Adams had managed to bypass Section 1b, by introducing a motion in 1983 allowing the “discussion” of any aspect of the Sinn Féin constitution. This change may indeed have facilitated debate on abstentionism but it did not infringe on the content or effect of Section 1b in any way. To discuss something is not the same as formally proposing or supporting it. For example, conventions are held regularly where drug addiction is discussed without any of the delegates proposing or supporting it. In fact the line Adams added in 1983 was superfluous, as the Sinn Féin constitution had never banned the “discussion” of anything – just the “approving” and “supporting” of taking seats in named partitionist parliaments. Of course its not illegal to amend or remove section 1b. Section 1b. bans the approval or support of candidates who intend to take seats in British assemblies. It can be removed or amended at any Ard Fheis by a two thirds majority. The reason for doing so could be many. Perhaps delegates might feel that it implies that they cannot be trusted to be loyal to the Republic. In fact its not necess	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
60,437,258	` == The Truth about the 1986 Sinn Féin Ard Fheis == The story of how Gerry Adams tried to turn an eighty year old revolutionary movement into a British Constitutional party. How he broke the Sinn Féin constitution, created fake cumainn to give him fake votes and barred life long republicans from voting. How he managed to expel himself and his supporters from Sinn Féin membership. And, how a small band of republicans managed to keep the Sinn Féin constitution and traditional policy in tact. In 1986 Section 1b. of the Sinn Féin constitution read as follows: “No person who is a member of any political party organisation or who approves of or supports the candidature of persons who, if elected, intend taking part in the proceedings of the Westminster or partitionist 26-County or 6-County parliaments or who approves of or supports the candidature of persons who sign any form or give any kind of written or verbal undertaking of intention to take their seats in these institutions, shall be admitted to membership or allowed to retain membership.`` The Adams leadership put forward a motion, titled Resolution 162, at the 1986 Ard Fheis. Its wording was as follows: RESOLUTION 162 THAT this Ard-Fheis drops its abstentionist attitude to Leinster House. Successful Sinn Fein parliamentary candidates in 26-County elections: a. Shall attend Leinster House as directed by the Ard Chomhairle. b. Shall not draw their salaries for personal use. (Parliamentary representatives shall be paid a Sinn Fein organiser’s subsidy, and the Leinster House salary shall be divided at the direction of the Ard Chomhairle to defray national and constituency expenses.) To accommodate this change, the Constitution and Rules be amended as follows: That Section 1b of the Constitution be amended to read: No person who is a member of any political party organisation or who approves of or supports the candidature of persons who, if elected, intend taking part in the proceedings of the Westminster or partitionist 6-County parliaments or who approves of or supports the candidature of persons who sign any form or give any kind of written or verbal undertaking of intention to take their seats in these institutions, shall be admitted to membership or allowed to retain membership. Motion 162 supports and approves of the candidature of persons who, if elected, would be of the intention to take their seats in certain circumstances i.e. on the direction of the Ard Chomhairle. Obviously, Motion 162 infringes Section 1b. Section 1b. was in effect at the time this Resolution was presented. Its clear that Adams made a mistake in procedure. He should have sought a majority decision to amend Section 1b. in 1986 and returned in 1987 to propose entering Leinster House. Trying to amend Section 1b. and propose taking seats in the “partitionist 26-County Parliament” in the same Resolution was a logical impossibility. Can anybody say that the wording: “That this Ard-Fheis drops its abstentionist attitude to Leinster House. Successful Sinn Fein parliamentary candidates in 26-County elections: a. Shall attend Leinster House as directed by the Ard Chomhairle” does not constitute the supporting and approving of the candidature of persons who intend to take their seats in Leinster House as directed by the Ard Chomhairle? Clearly Adams was in breach of Section 1b. and according to that section he had expelled himself, and all those who voted for Resolution 162. Brian Feeney, in his book, Sinn Féin 100 Turbulent Years, puts forward the argument that Adams had managed to bypass Section 1b, by introducing a motion in 1983 allowing the “discussion” of any aspect of the Sinn Féin constitution. This change may indeed have facilitated debate on abstentionism but it did not infringe on the content or effect of Section 1b in any way. To discuss something is not the same as formally proposing or supporting it. For example, conventions are held regularly where drug addiction is discussed without any of the delegates proposing or supporting it. In fact the line Adams added in 1983 was superfluous, as the Sinn Féin constitution had never banned the “discussion” of anything – just the “approving” and “supporting” of taking seats in named partitionist parliaments. Of course its not illegal to amend or remove section 1b. Section 1b. bans the approval or support of candidates who intend to take seats in British assemblies. It can be removed or amended at any Ard Fheis by a two thirds majority. The reason for doing so could be many. Perhaps delegates might feel that it implies that they cannot be trusted to be loyal to the Republic. In fact its not necessary, according to the constitution, to give any reason. But you	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
60,443,562	==Deletes== I put a speedy delete tag on the Health Sciences Centre article, I think speedy deletes are applicable to this type of situation, but the admin that looks at it will decide. Regarding the list of films/tv shot in Winnipeg, just merge in any extra information from List of films shot in Winnipeg into List of TV and films shot in Winnipeg and then List of films shot in Winnipeg can be changed into a redirect.	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
60,448,055	` ::Agreed. It's original ``analysis,`` albeit flawed, akin to original research. ==Producer credit== The primary producers on the film were Vachon, Koffler, and Wlodkowski. Jeremy Barber was listed as the sole producer, which is inaccurate and incorrect. Barber was one of three credited executive producers, which is a less important and more honorary credit than ``producer.`` I have corrected accordingly. `	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
60,449,193	== if you rreally want to beat TawkerBot to the vandalism == you should look into either WP:VandalProof, or WP:POP, besides, tawkerbot, and all it's second and third cousins only revert blankings, vandalism that doesn't remove large chunks of content, still require manual reverts	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
60,451,911	== Don't edit other user's talk page entries == I don't know what your intent was, but please don't ever do that again.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
60,459,008	*You want to build a pump that can transport billions of gallons of water to higher ground?	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
60,459,508	` == Rfa == You've answered a lot of questions on your RfA and are to be commended for it. Can I ask one more (asked here as opposed to the RfA page because it's getting crowded) that means a lot to me: You patrol CAT:CSD for a backlog, and come across this stub up for CSD A7: Doctor ABCD is a professor of medicine at University of EFGH. His area of interest is neuro-ophthalmology and he has published extensively in the field. How would you approach making the decision to delete it? Many thanks. I've reviewed all of your contributions, but, for your RfA where age vs. maturity has come up, this question will decide my ``vote``. `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
60,465,959	:I agree, but the Inland Empire has a hate crime epidemic in recent years and the majority of meth drug labs are in the High Desert (Yucca Valley/ Twentynine Palms). The region may develop a bad image as a magnet for hate groups and the rising crime rate gives us a negative name. I wish we can talk about something else, but it's an issue we must address in the Inland Empire and stop gangs, drugs or crime before it gets worse. The problem hits hard in Palm Springs, where a large gay/lesbian community lives, and Palm Desert with a large population of European Jews who are holocaust survivors. Last year, nazi gangs targeted a few black families' homes in Murrieta by hate mail and property vandalism. There's a FBI statistic on the number of members in hate groups and white supremacists live in the Menifee Valley between Perris and Lake Elsinore. Most residents like myself don't like this and oppose their racist ideology, so it's time for all of us to combat this sort of thing. +	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
60,478,207	== your very odd messages re vandalism and blocking == I think it would be as well for you to double check your info re my email address and any problems you have had/are having. To discover your messages I looked at your site for the FIRST time and can totally refute any notion that there have been dabblings with your site by myself or this aol connection. Kindly adjust your records. S Armstrong	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
60,480,451	. I'll post this suggestion at Talk:Solar cell	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
60,480,752	`Sorry, ScienceApologist, but it is true. Suggest you check out Washington DC for yourself - the capital city of the USA contains the most publically set horoscopes of all the capitals of the world. Moreover, it is a known fact that the city itself was constructed and oriented (along with major monuments, including the White House) to the cluster of main stars in the constellation Virgo. Your statement, ``by some enterprising conspiratists`` according to the facts must mean you refer to George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, Benjamin Bannacker, etc., as ``conspiracists`` because they used classical astrology for practical purposes? These are historical facts that cannot be denied ScienceApologist, and, no matter the POV, are well-known. Attempts to somehow ``deny`` the obvious is futile since these are historical and well-recorded facts. Your own ``personal view`` does not suffice to make it not so. For more, check out David Ovason's book - ``The Secret Architection of our Nation's Capital`` - `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
60,482,209	== Moving pages ? == Hi, thanks for moving the Prezista entry ... one of my firsta actions at Wikipedia was to move a page. As you can see, the history is not moved with the page when copying just the content. And ... some people really flame you for this, I will not. The next time you should maybe ask an administrator to move the history, too. Happy editing, I love Wikipedia and the collaborative work ...	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
60,483,560	they are claiming that Gorbachev apologized that accepted that Soviet crackdown on barbaric Baku was his the only and biggest mistake in his political life? Can you believe?? WHere are they taking this kind of information from? I guess they put their fingers in their rectum and get some information from there. My advice- just ignore that idiot named Grandmaster. Let him bullshit online if Wikipedia allows that. Paranoic people are all over. Azeri claims will never erase witnesses' memories. We are still alive	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
60,492,765	` == unsourced and POV information removed == I removed a considerable amount of POV, OR, opinions, and uncited/unsourced medical claims from the article. 72.154.154.40 chose to revert it, stating ``removing such a significant chunk of the page was too destructive. Can we wait for some citations before annihilating all that stuff?`` The answer is absolutely not: it wouldn't matter so much if this were an article on dog food or something, but you cannot, cannot, cannot have unsourced, uncited and misleading information regarding medical/safety/health matters. For a subject as important as this, medical advice and claims MUST be properly and responsibly sourced. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
60,493,059	You're full of shit.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	true
60,493,649	:I dunno, it could have something to do with the thousands of deaths that Falun Gong has inflicted upon our families and friends. Or maybe something to do with the pain and suffering of thousands more that Falun Gong is responsible for.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
60,494,722	Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Please do not remove the bold formatting of the article name in the introductory paragraph, as you did in Gold coin - this is a standard formatting feature of all Wikipedia articles.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
60,496,136	:Very interesting! Typical for PRL ith those armchairs ;-)	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
60,501,770	::Ok, I cannot find the relevant place on their site anymore, but for the El Greco image I used and cropped, it is already on wikimedia commons here: ::http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:El_Greco_051.jpg ::For the Pericles one: ::http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Pericles.jpg ::The others are all from HM of C. I sent them an email for verification of it. It hsould come frough within the next day.	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
60,505,579	== He is Draman == Yes, there is confusion about his name because GFA misspelled his name. I talked to him on the subject and he confirmed his last name is DRAMAN. I'm not familiar with how this site works but it would be nice if his name would be writen corectly. Thank you.	2,006	false	article	random	test	false
60,511,137	==antares== this is one big motherfucker	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	true
60,515,751	:I'm trying. — Jun. 25, '06 [17:56] <[ freak]\|[ talk]>	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
60,521,909	` The first V-8 engine of record was not A De Dion-Bouton but was the Antoinette V-8 of 1903 Antoinette had a 180 degrees crankshaft did all others until Wright, who was making the Hispano-Suiza of 718 cu. In. and 1124 cu. in. in about 1918 or a later wanted to put the 90 degree crankshaft into the 1124” engine but the Navy and the Army Air Corp wanted air cooled Radials so this left it up to Cadillac to do it in 1923. This is recorded in Manuel Lage’s book about Hispano-Suiza page 66, Line 10. http://www.tecsoc.org/pubs/history/2002/dec2.htm That design came from a Frenchman with a background in art, Léon-Marie-Joseph-Clement Levavasseur (1863-1922). He started work on his new engine in about 1900. His engine had eight cylinders, but instead of putting them in a straight line, Levavasseur arranged them in the shape of a ``V.`` It was a powerful and compact design, and when he received a French patent on December 2, 1902, Levavasseur became the first person to patent what we now call a V-8 engine. http://www.hubertlathamwindkiller.com/Monoplane.htm The Antoinette engine was designed and built in France by Léon Levavasseur. Named after the designer's daughter, it was Europe's most widely used engine until 1909-1910. The first Antoinette engine dated from about 1901 and was used in a speedboat. By 1905, Levavasseur had produced a water-cooled engine with eight-cylinders arranged in a 90-degree ``V`` and with direct fuel injection. It was safe, strong, and fairly powerful, generating 50 horsepower (37 kilowatts) and weighing about 110 pounds (50 kilograms). Its power-to-weight ratio was not surpassed for 25 years Antoinette VII. Designed by Léon Levavasseur, who was an artist as well as a gifted engineer, the Antoinette range possessed an almost art nouveau sense of elegance. The engine, also named 'Antoinette', came first, being designed by Levavasseur in 1903 to power motor boats. Both Santos-Dumont and the Voisins used this engine to power their early machines. The motor was of advanced design, utilizing direct fuel injection and evaporative steam cooling - which took place in long tubes fixed along the sides of the fuselage. M. L. Anderson`	2,006	false	article	blocked	test	false
60,522,611	Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to User talk:Wiki alf, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
60,524,338	`:I think that we should say something about ``Culture / Community`` - certainly such sites exist, even if we need to trim some material as being speculation or unsourced. Also I don't see what's wrong with ``It is not universally recognised, but it is a well known date within the grass-roots movement of self-injury awareness.``? :: I agree a ``Culture / Community`` section is necessary and would love see a well-sourced, non-POV one. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
60,526,028	` ==Article Improvement Drive (WP:AID)== {\| class=``notice noprint`` id=```` style=``background: #ffccFF; border: 1px solid #ff33FF; margin: 0 auto;`` \|- \| \| Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.This week Epic of Gilgamesh was selected to be improved to featured article status.Hope you can help… \|} `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
60,530,785	` CBDunkerson, I hope this comment on my own talk page is not considered intervention. (I see I've been unblocked.) I did not mean to suggest that MONGO was purposely inserting information as part of his job. The only reason I said ``I would not be surprised``, is because this has been going on for a while now and Wikipedia has not stopped it. What else am I to think? (Although I admit to not being familiar with Wikipedia's procedures.) Still, that comment by me is nothing compared to what MONGO's been getting away with. (Also just noticed this btw.) Wikipedia is supposed to be NPOV which is why MONGO should steer clear of the 9/11 pages. An examination of the exchanges between MONGO and myself here is a good example: MONGO seems content with personal attacks: ``who cares how many misguided folks there are``. His comments are clearly ad hominem personal attacks towards me, and many others. The following, from this page, shows he's content with namecalling as well. I removed an external link to a namecalling site, MONGO reverts me leaving the following statement: I like this weblink...it summaries things quite well I apologize for any insinuations on my part, but also must stress my own attempts at a NPOV. I'm sure we all agree, from MONGO's own statements here that he is neither apologetic nor neutral: ``The POV pushers that try to add nonsense to the articles related to the 9/11 events have been told repeatedly that the vast majority of their ``contributions`` to those article violated numerous policies. This doesn't seem to stop them. This editor I blocked routinely reverts those that support the concensus verison and yes, conspiracy theorists is what they are...they are not researchers. Simply put, and I won't apologize for this not being more civil, I will continue to block POV pushers that disrupt the discussion pages and the articles with nonsense. Two other admins responded to the unblock request and did not unblock this editor. I then moved the early parts of this conversation from an article talk page to here for all to see. It is ludicrus to assume that I was doing anything other than to ensure that the POV pushers of nonsense know that there is a limit to the level of disruption that needs to be tolerated.`` If MONGO calls this paper, which has been peer reviewed by two physicists before being accepted for publication in a book, ``nonsense``, obviously he is not NPOV `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
60,531,037	As one of the few legitimate Astrologers on Wikipedia, I should be allowed to edit the Astrology pages, especially since there are so many unethical debunker administrators who continually harrass or delete honest input.	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
60,531,264	==Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Judaism== Dear Bresolver! I have created Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Judaism. Please put it on your watchlist, and please add relevant AfD's as you find them. Cheers. - /email	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
60,531,640	`Welcome! Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so, as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and edit articles; however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is 24.211.99.183). Logging in does not require any personal details, and there are many other benefits for logging in. When you edit pages: * Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly. * Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy. * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so. * Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such content or editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism. The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. For now, if you are stuck, you can click the edit this page tab above, type {{helpme}} in the edit box, and then click Save Page; an experienced Wikipedian will be around shortly to answer any questions you may have. Also feel free to ask a question on . I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia. Slgr@ndson ( - - `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
60,533,466	`If you took a history of science course, you would know that scientists and engineers are continually inventing and refining their research tools and techniques. Rather than accusing Astrology of being a ``psuedoscience`` you should acknowledge Astrology for being the PRE-science that it is. Emperical observation finds that many (no, not all) astrological procedures work. It's not in the job description of us Astrologers to prove that Astrology is a science. But rather it's within the job description of the physical science researchers to improve the acumen of their research tools so as to discover why Astrology works. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
60,535,798	== Mosque of Babur == In Urdu the name of the Masjid is بابري and the name of Emperor Babur is بابر Therefore we can derive that Babri Masjid = Babur's Masjid or Masjid (Mosque) of Babur in english.	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
60,538,547	` == Self-aggrandizing POV? == The phrase 'self-aggrandizing' has been removed several times for two reasons: It's [[WP:POV\|POV]. It's redundant, apparently because it's made clear by the rest of the article. I'm not sure either of these reasons are valid. What POV is the 'self-aggrandizing' phrase pushing? It doesn't seem to be something either the GNAA's supporters or detractors would disagree with, making it unclear whether or not it's POV at all. It seems to simply be an indisputable fact, evidenced by, among many other things, the article itself as well as the GNAA's website. Also, if the statement is not POV, it can't be said to be inappropriately unbalancing the article by including the POV of one side and not the other; that the GNAA are a self-aggrandizing group is a simple fact. Another reason given for the phrase's removal was that it was redundant. That might be the case, but isn't redundancy not only acceptable, but desired in the first paragraph of an article, which is generally supposed to act as a summary? I'm really not sure why this phrase is causing so much controversy. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
60,545,184	` == Damac censors the truth again == Again Damac has shown that he regards this site as his personal property. The argument I wrote under the title ``The Truth about the 1986 Sinn Féin Ard Fheis was not a party political statement but my own composition. It seems that writing any argument on Wikipedia is OK as long as it dosnt conflict with Damac's views. He gives a link to a political debate site where I also posted the same argument. Why should Wikipedia users be directed to a political debate site to read arguments that were composed for this site and then posted on the debate site. That my composition was posted here on this site can be seen by checking the time of posting my argument here and checking the time I posted it on Politics i.e. I think ``genuine Wikipedia`` users can make up their own mind about Damac's motives. Fortunately Damac's ability to censor is limited here as readers can review the history of this page by pressing the ``History`` button. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
60,549,603	when did luna mention princess saturn in the anima	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
60,550,229	William M. Connolley I have seen what has happened on this page. He keeps reverting XGustaX's edits even after XGustaX showed his facts and sources. Thanks. ( )	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
60,550,427	William M. Connolley I have seen what has happened on this page. He keeps reverting XGustaX's edits even after XGustaX showed his facts and sources. Thanks ( )	2,006	false	user	blocked	test	false
60,551,323	I also agree with XGustaX with his edits why should the Spanish peoples page not be treated like other ethic pages, the page is over sourced and has information that is clearly not 100 accurate as XgustaX sources clearly say they are wrong.	2,006	false	user	blocked	dev	false
60,552,923	` == I am ``excusing`` you == Hello, I have been at the Spanish people talk page this morning and I also the revert war that happened. I check both you and XGustaX talk pages and by what I could tell he just wanted to talk about the information that clearly is being quesioned by the articles he presented. You seem like you didn't want to listen to anything he had to say and just excused him of all sorts of things. That is what i am excusing you of. His articles are properly sourced and you dismissed them even still he had two of them and you still went out this rampage. I told William what I saw today with you and XGustaX. ( )`	2,006	false	user	blocked	dev	false
60,554,077	== Does suicide constitute defenestration? == I've seen the term used many times before in the context of throwing oneself from a window, including several examples within this very article. However, it seems a tad difficult to literally throw your own body in such a fashion. Is it proper, then, to cite defenstration for the act of jumping through said window? AWF	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
60,555,188	:: Godfrey_Daniel: Even though you may disagree with an editor on a personal level I still think you should explain why this attack should be listed. It seems AlanzoB has a valid point above, especially in regards to a lack of polticians even mentioning what should beif it's terrorisma major terrorist attack on our soil.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
60,562,816	` —The preceding unsigned comment was added by • . ::I'm not sure I get your point. Readers of Wikipedia aren't required to be familiar with all of its policies and guidelines, and so it can't be assumed that they will know about the notability requirements, which are in fact only a guideline. Moreover, there are plenty of organizations which don't go out of their way to publicize themselves yet are still notable, and aggrandizing connotates way more than just publicity. Including 'self-aggrandizing' doesn't at all suggest that that's their primary motive. As well, there could be notable trolls or notable trolling groups who don't self-aggrandize, and certainly not to the extent and in the joie de vire manner the GNAA does. Indeed, many trolling groups and individuals try to obscure or hide the fact that they're trolls, which often makes their activities more successful. Therefore, phrase is clearly relevant and not POV. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
60,575,459	Let me state once again that my edits take place ONLY in the intersection of upsetting Amy and improving Wikipedia. If my edits are frivolous or poor, or if you can cite misbehaviour, I'm open to correction.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
60,577,205	` == Sinn Féin 1986 Ard Fheis post not a ``Party Political Statement`` but a personal view == The argument I wrote under the title ``The Truth about the 1986 Sinn Féin Ard Fheis`` was not a party political statement but my own composition. As I am not even a member of any political party it is difficult to see how my contribution could be regarded as a ``Party Political statement.`` An editor deleted my argument and gives a link to a political debate site where I also posted the same argument. Why should Wikipedia users be directed to a political debate site to read arguments that were composed for this site and then, later, posted on the debate site. That my composition was posted first here on this site can be seen by checking the time of posting my argument here and checking the time I posted it on Politics i.e. I think ``genuine Wikipedia`` users can make up their own mind about the motives for deleteing my composition. Needless to say it casts doubt on the accuracy of the Wikipedia ``Republican Sinn Féin`` article. Fortunately readers can review the history of this page by pressing the ``History`` button.`	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
60,591,676	Everyone shut up i havnt been here for hours and when i return DEBATE this argument is over like that one man said	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
60,591,678	===Her Album Sales= Hard Core has sold 2.2 million copies in US and over five million worldwide. The Notorious KIm hassold 1.5 million units since 2000. La Bella Mafia has sold 1.3 million units The Naked Truth has sold almost 400 thousand copies. You guys are constantly changing the article, my gosh, I don't know what to beleive	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
60,591,898	I think we should steer away from the gallery look. It is generally regarded as a sign of a lack imagination, where one can just plonk any old pic there without editing them carefully into the article's text. In my experience, galleries are frowned upon & usually are forced to be deleted during FAC or peer review. For now it should stay until more text is created to place the pics in, but after that, or if it is up for FAC, the gallery should be deleted...	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
60,592,708	1.As we all know In his heart freeza feared the saiyans he wanted to SLIGHTLY exagerate his powerlevel so that Gohan and vegeta couldnt have confidence he is simply trying to intimidate the z senshi so that no one would have confidence and the slightest chance there is a group of fans that actually believs he is lying you know. 2.he could be refering to his fourth form 100% form his maximum power in the series	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
60,593,215	I'm not your son, you crazy bugger.	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	true
60,593,323	DONT MESS WITH AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANY ARTICLE I CREATE AND IS MINE	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
60,594,723	You both are a bit rude please do not get yourself banned you do not want that do you	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
60,595,382	He just MIGHT have been telling the truth but i doubt it	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
60,595,431	` :First, it is not a clay model. Second, please don't double-post. You've already said this and no one has responded to it. Third, see the above discussion, and it would be appreciated if you were to contribute to it. -) `	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
60,595,492	quite all right your cause is noble	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
60,596,637	Yes iam sorry you were not apologized to sir	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
60,596,886	Very but its a problem	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
60,597,019	Dont invade my life	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
60,598,122	You arrogant administrator homosexual bastards fuck off	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	true
60,598,831	Fucking administrators DAMN YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	true
60,599,368	:No prob and thanks.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
60,602,938	:I disagree with the it being PD-usgov. I don't see any indication of it being taken by an employee of the united states Federal government.	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
60,607,710	You should note the reasons I removed what I removed. Allegations of ties (involvement even?) to terrorism is a pretty serious matter. I deleted allegations that were either 1) refuted by more reliable and current sources (I assumed documents published with the support of Congress in Feb 2006 were more reliable than a magazine website that published articles on the same matter in 2001), 2) inconsistent with the sources actually cited (most of the indictments listed did not involve CAIR, and several allegations of indictment weren't sourced at all), and 3) editorial content that seemed to be founded in the writer's own opinion rather than sourced data. You suggested the information I deleted were 'important'. The information were pungent statements indicative of highly criminal acts on the part of CAIR, info which would have been noteworthy had they been properly documented and cited. Much of that information is refutable with more reliable sources, such as publications produced by the US government. Please discuss before further reverts.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
60,608,561	==CAIR== I noticed your comment on another user's talk page, who in turn spoke to me. Please do not encourage POV-driven participation, and do not make unfounded allegations of POV-bias. Please take note of WP:AGF, WP:NPOV, and WP:RS. Information in an article which can potentially be called slander if unfounded needs to be supported with highly credible sources. Too much of the information you've re-added are unsourced, others are supported by sources that don't speak to the content you're adding. Do not use content from sources and then draw your own interpretations of what they mean. Also, bear in mind that sources that come from editorials or opinion pieces need to be represented in the article as opinions, not relayed as fact. This is particularly the case when the source has a clearly partisan allegience.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
60,612,232	==Gilles Tréhin== I have listed this article at WP:DRV for possible undeletion based on information I have received regarding a book that has been written by Trehin about his fictional city, Urville. Interested parties should contribute to the discussion. ==Is this still deserving of featured article status?== I'm beginning to think that this article should be removed from the list of featured articles. It seems to me that political ideas and attempts to be politically correct have compromised the factual veracity of this article. This should be a pretty straightforward article about a neurological disorder like epilepsy or aphasia. Instead, it reads as if Asperger syndrome is either some kind of blessing or lifestyle choice and that there are negligible drawbacks to having it. The very fact that many of the participants on the talk page take issue or offense at even calling AS a disorder or disease when it is viewed as such by the medical community is rather telling. I really think the mainstream medical and scientific view should be emphasized, as medicine and science strive to have the neutral point of view that this article lacks. I'm not looking for an argument. I'm simply warning those interested that if this article stays as it is I will probably lobby to have it removed as a featured article.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
60,615,396	:::You are a vandal, you removed the reference to chapter 291 even tho i edited not to violate the copyright. Also there is no speculation again. You are the dick, not me.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	true
60,617,527	:::::You have obviously no argument to justify your vandalism and censorship attempt, except that you are logged-in. Can I laugh at your stupidity. There is no copyright infrigment nor speculation in what i posted. You just want to censor elements that don't please you. You are trying to CENSOR elements of the bio.	2,006	false	article	blocked	test	true
60,623,968	` Hi, Petedavo, Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like this place — I sure do — and want to stay. Before getting too in-depth, you may want to read about the Five pillars of Wikipedia and simplified ruleset. If you need help on how to title new articles check out the naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. If you need help look at Wikipedia:Help and the FAQ , plus if you can't find your answer there, check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. And if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will be by to help you shortly. - ====Additional tips==== Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia! If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you. You can sign your name using three tildes (~). If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Five will get you the datestamp only. You may want to add yourself to the new user log. If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted. If you're still entirely confused, or would like to get a better grasp of your wikipedia skills, and you have an IRC client (or don't mind getting one), check out the Bootcamp. It's not what it sounds like, but it is fun and can help you with your editing skills. If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal. Happy Wiki-ing. — Click here to respond to this message! `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
60,626,152	== ==	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
60,627,379	` == Hogwarts Daily AFD == Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem to me that Hogwarts Daily meets these criteria, I have started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted. Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hogwarts Daily. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the ``articles for deletion`` template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, an administrator will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article.`	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
60,628,577	` == From the german Wiki: Schrein des Buches == Hello Yurik. As I know the ``Shrine of the book`` is only a part of the Israel Museum. You translated my hebrew and engish bots in ``Israel Museum`` (en) and מוזיאון ישראל (he) instead of ``Shrine of the book`` (the article exists by the way also in the english Wiki) and היכל הספר. I suppose you know the difference between the israel museum and the shrine. Why did you change the bots? Please answer it here or on my discussion site. Thanx Trinityfolium`	2,006	false	user	random	train	false
60,637,546	` :This is just my opinion, but I don't think ``School counselor`` is of wide enough interest. `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
60,643,121	:Sorry, I have merged the two together, I just thought it was a bit rude.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
60,643,237	` :::::Thank you Alphachimp. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
60,649,012	` == Oh, for heavens' sake! == Honestly, I'm sick of edit wars like this. Can't we just use correct English? If you are insistent on calling it ``A train station or railroad station (or, in British English, a railway station)`` (to quote an old version of the main article), why not divide Wikipedia in two, with http://usa.wikipedia.org for those of you who believe that American English is the best form of English and http://en.wikipedia.org for those of us who like to use PROPER ENGLISH! .`	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
60,650,785	`and likely will be for the forseeable future), shouldn't ``train station`` come first with ``railway station`` and ``railroad station`` offered as alternatives? — :Well, yes - however, doesn't seem to like ``train station`` (apparently on the grounds that American English is ``incorrect``). I've tidied this up now for consistency. == That endless debate... == In my view this article should be at Station, and the other meanings listed at Station (disambiguation). This would be consistent with both normal English usage (US and British) and n ormal Wikipedia practice. And the objections are?... == Oh, for heavens' sake! == Honestly, I'm sick of edit wars like this. Can't we just use correct English? If you are insistent on calling it ``A train station or railroad station (or, in British English, a railway station)`` (to quote an old version of the main article), why not divide Wikipedia in two, with http://usa.wikipedia.org for those of you who believe that American English is the best form of English and http://en.wikipedia.org for those of us who like to use PROPER ENGLISH! .`	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
60,654,612	==Dismal's Paradox on deletion review== An editor has asked for a deletion review of Dismal's Paradox. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
60,656,786	DESTROY the animations! They chew up bandwidth and wreck the page load time. The page is big enough with all the TeX symbols, the other fancy graphics are overkill.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
60,658,748	==Nicolau dos Reis Lobato== You: Saw your work on this page. Thanks for dropping by. 26 June 2006 (UTC) Me: Thank you. It was rather small. But you know: Small is beautiful. Please remain in touch.	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
60,673,038	June 2006 (UTC) On top of everything, your admonition to me seems to be license for IronDuke to continue making personal attacks on me like this: . Unless you can convince him to stop making unjustified and unproven allegations, I will continue removing the personal attack. 15:48, 26	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
60,673,356	`* Democracy Democracy (varieties) History of democracy Democratic capitalism Grassroots democracy Illiberal democracy Jacksonian democracy Jeffersonian democracy Multiparty democracy New Democracy Parliamentary democracy Social democracy Totalitarian democracy Workplace democracy Procedural democracy Emerging democracy Liberal democracy Islamic democracy Democracy watch Inclusive Democracy democracy (word) Republican democracy Socialist Democracy Industrial democracy Free Democracy Basis democracy Constitutional democracy Real Democracy Democracy & Nature Democracy Movement Liquid democracy Internet democracy Messianic democracy Cultural democracy Emergent democracy Democracy Records and of course: Democracy: An American Novel Democracy (video platform) In the ``See also`` section: Demarchy Dominant-party system First Party System, Second Party System, and Third Party System Party-list proportional representation Sortition *Westminster system`	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
60,673,360	::::: True, but did you read the sentence before this?	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false

60,370,853

I've done that lots only to have you revert me. This is not a legitimate block..

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

60,371,719

You review it and maybe you will get a clue. I think you are vindictive and petty. You might as well stay out of my page.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

60,375,136

==Culture== Thanks, OK, sounds good. I throw things, then take things out.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

60,376,311

==How proud I am to be a Greek!== I am a Greek Nationalist this is nothing to be ashamed of, I believe in fascism and a strong leader, and let me first say that I despise Turks, I have changed the image section to include what I believe is a wider variety of great Greeks from the ages. I really wanted to include Constantine XI or other Byzantine but I couldn't. Perhaps we can work something out?

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

60,377,330

== Copy == So did we copy the article from this page, or did they copy from us?

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

60,378,474

`Please do not remove content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. e `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

60,378,675

England to win the world cup

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

60,379,531

:Pictures were taken from the Greek Ministry of Culture website, as explained already. They are open to the public domain.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

60,380,898

== Nomination == I've nominated this for GA status. Personally, I think it isn't quite there yet, although it arguably meets all criteria. The lack of images is because, as far as I am aware there are no non-copyrighted photos of the bird. I was a little worried about the section stubs, but Great Barrier Reef has passed as a GA with section stubs, so ... Over to you, independent reviewer.

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

60,381,099

:::How do I go about doing that? Ministry of Culture pictures are in the public domain, that is easy to prove, but how do I prove that they are the Ministry's own images? Why would they release them into the public domain if they were not Greek Ministry pictures?

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

60,381,451

` All I can find with relative to the latter are this: Collection of material, writing, editing of texts: Pigi Kalogerakou, Aspasia Michanou, Dimitris Mylonas, Andreas Vlachopoulos Texts were written by - the Ephorates of Antiquities and Monuments of the Ministry for the section ``Cultural Heritage`` - the services of the Ministry and the cultural organisations and institutes involved for the section ``Modern and Contemporary Cultural Creation`` - Prof. Chrysanthos Christou, Member of the Athens Academy for the introduction to ``Visual Arts in Modern Greece`` - Kostas Georgousopoulos, philologist and theatre critic, for the introduction to ``Theatre in Greece`` - the services of the Ministry for the sections ``Great Projects of the Ministry``, ``Special Issues`` and ``Selected Cultural Events`` Source: http://www.culture.gr/`

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

60,382,409

I wasn't even going to answer, but no, I will not apologize because I didn't even make any attack. I made a point of trying to make it clear that I wasn't attacking you when I was referring to the disinfo campaigns and such. I said that it wasn't right of me to speak for you and that you can speak for yourself. I even tried to be sensitive about it when I was giving CB Brooklyn the info and the articles, but even that isn't enough for you. And I never gave any information that Mongo didn't give himself. You simply don't want the subject mentioned even when it's pertinent to the conversation, or it's starting to look now like especially when it's pertinent to the conversation. This block is totally illegitimate and I know that is the case. Mongo can call me a loonie, say that people should put in padded cells, straight jackets, then I get blocked for the conversation at Talk:Collapse of the World Trade Center? This must be my figurative padded cell. Innuendo? Big deal. This is all BS is what this is. Thanks for blocking me Mongo, you are giving everyone another great demonstration. I will take responsibility for having brought it up. What do you think Tom? What do you think is right?

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

true

60,391,366

` Whatever, the original disambig. line was more accurate - ``''This article describes the historical development of the estimation of the age of the Earth, concentrating on scientific dating methods...`` - that's what the article does - including a short sentence on pre science methods. But the change ``this article details scientific methods..`` is not as accurate. User:Stevertigo's edit 'this article focusses on scientific methods`` is better than the current state. I don't know exactly why it was changed since it 'wasn't broke' before - now it's not as good for apparently the sake of being one line shorter. That's no good. I'd like to just change it back. `

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

60,399,500

== a gentle warning == By now it should be evident to you that many other editors are watching the Billy Joel article, and that all the time you spend trying to remove joelfan.com and switch it with your own spam link is wasted effort. Wikipedia operates by consensus, and the consensus is clearly against you.

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

60,402,710

2006 :All tags are off as of right now! 05:51 PM, 24 June

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

60,406,736

:: Well we all know what your taste is like from your bigoted comment above.

2,006

false

article

blocked

dev

false

60,420,132

`At the bottom it lists different Wyoming cities. One of these reads ``Bristol`` and links to ``Bristol, RI. Why????? `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

60,429,761

::::I didn't see a need to quote him. I thought the link to the transcript was just fine as long as the summary did not make it appear as if he opposed the H-1B completely as compared to abuses of it. LordPathogen

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

60,436,523

` == The Truth about the 1986 Sinn Féin Ard Fheis and the Unbroken Continuity of Sinn Féin Poblachtach since 1905 == The story of how Gerry Adams tried to turn an eighty year old revolutionary movement into a British Constitutional party. How he broke the Sinn Féin constitution, created fake cumainn to give him fake votes and barred life long republicans from voting. How he managed to expel himself and his supporters from Sinn Féin membership. And, how a small band of republicans managed to keep the Sinn Féin constitution and traditional policy in tact. In 1986 Section 1b. of the Sinn Féin constitution read as follows: “No person who is a member of any political party organisation or who approves of or supports the candidature of persons who, if elected, intend taking part in the proceedings of the Westminster or partitionist 26-County or 6-County parliaments or who approves of or supports the candidature of persons who sign any form or give any kind of written or verbal undertaking of intention to take their seats in these institutions, shall be admitted to membership or allowed to retain membership.`` The Adams leadership put forward a motion, titled Resolution 162, at the 1986 Ard Fheis. Its wording was as follows: RESOLUTION 162 THAT this Ard-Fheis drops its abstentionist attitude to Leinster House. Successful Sinn Fein parliamentary candidates in 26-County elections: a. Shall attend Leinster House as directed by the Ard Chomhairle. b. Shall not draw their salaries for personal use. (Parliamentary representatives shall be paid a Sinn Fein organiser’s subsidy, and the Leinster House salary shall be divided at the direction of the Ard Chomhairle to defray national and constituency expenses.) To accommodate this change, the Constitution and Rules be amended as follows: That Section 1b of the Constitution be amended to read: No person who is a member of any political party organisation or who approves of or supports the candidature of persons who, if elected, intend taking part in the proceedings of the Westminster or partitionist 6-County parliaments or who approves of or supports the candidature of persons who sign any form or give any kind of written or verbal undertaking of intention to take their seats in these institutions, shall be admitted to membership or allowed to retain membership. Motion 162 supports and approves of the candidature of persons who, if elected, would be of the intention to take their seats in certain circumstances i.e. on the direction of the Ard Chomhairle. Obviously, Motion 162 infringes Section 1b. Section 1b. was in effect at the time this Resolution was presented. Its clear that Adams made a mistake in procedure. He should have sought a majority decision to amend Section 1b. in 1986 and returned in 1987 to propose entering Leinster House. Trying to amend Section 1b. and propose taking seats in the “partitionist 26-County Parliament” in the same Resolution was a logical impossibility. Can anybody say that the wording: “That this Ard-Fheis drops its abstentionist attitude to Leinster House. Successful Sinn Fein parliamentary candidates in 26-County elections: a. Shall attend Leinster House as directed by the Ard Chomhairle” does not constitute the supporting and approving of the candidature of persons who intend to take their seats in Leinster House as directed by the Ard Chomhairle? Clearly Adams was in breach of Section 1b. and according to that section he had expelled himself, and all those who voted for Resolution 162. Brian Feeney, in his book, Sinn Féin 100 Turbulent Years, puts forward the argument that Adams had managed to bypass Section 1b, by introducing a motion in 1983 allowing the “discussion” of any aspect of the Sinn Féin constitution. This change may indeed have facilitated debate on abstentionism but it did not infringe on the content or effect of Section 1b in any way. To discuss something is not the same as formally proposing or supporting it. For example, conventions are held regularly where drug addiction is discussed without any of the delegates proposing or supporting it. In fact the line Adams added in 1983 was superfluous, as the Sinn Féin constitution had never banned the “discussion” of anything – just the “approving” and “supporting” of taking seats in named partitionist parliaments. Of course its not illegal to amend or remove section 1b. Section 1b. bans the approval or support of candidates who intend to take seats in British assemblies. It can be removed or amended at any Ard Fheis by a two thirds majority. The reason for doing so could be many. Perhaps delegates might feel that it implies that they cannot be trusted to be loyal to the Republic. In fact its not necess

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

60,437,258

` == The Truth about the 1986 Sinn Féin Ard Fheis == The story of how Gerry Adams tried to turn an eighty year old revolutionary movement into a British Constitutional party. How he broke the Sinn Féin constitution, created fake cumainn to give him fake votes and barred life long republicans from voting. How he managed to expel himself and his supporters from Sinn Féin membership. And, how a small band of republicans managed to keep the Sinn Féin constitution and traditional policy in tact. In 1986 Section 1b. of the Sinn Féin constitution read as follows: “No person who is a member of any political party organisation or who approves of or supports the candidature of persons who, if elected, intend taking part in the proceedings of the Westminster or partitionist 26-County or 6-County parliaments or who approves of or supports the candidature of persons who sign any form or give any kind of written or verbal undertaking of intention to take their seats in these institutions, shall be admitted to membership or allowed to retain membership.`` The Adams leadership put forward a motion, titled Resolution 162, at the 1986 Ard Fheis. Its wording was as follows: RESOLUTION 162 THAT this Ard-Fheis drops its abstentionist attitude to Leinster House. Successful Sinn Fein parliamentary candidates in 26-County elections: a. Shall attend Leinster House as directed by the Ard Chomhairle. b. Shall not draw their salaries for personal use. (Parliamentary representatives shall be paid a Sinn Fein organiser’s subsidy, and the Leinster House salary shall be divided at the direction of the Ard Chomhairle to defray national and constituency expenses.) To accommodate this change, the Constitution and Rules be amended as follows: That Section 1b of the Constitution be amended to read: No person who is a member of any political party organisation or who approves of or supports the candidature of persons who, if elected, intend taking part in the proceedings of the Westminster or partitionist 6-County parliaments or who approves of or supports the candidature of persons who sign any form or give any kind of written or verbal undertaking of intention to take their seats in these institutions, shall be admitted to membership or allowed to retain membership. Motion 162 supports and approves of the candidature of persons who, if elected, would be of the intention to take their seats in certain circumstances i.e. on the direction of the Ard Chomhairle. Obviously, Motion 162 infringes Section 1b. Section 1b. was in effect at the time this Resolution was presented. Its clear that Adams made a mistake in procedure. He should have sought a majority decision to amend Section 1b. in 1986 and returned in 1987 to propose entering Leinster House. Trying to amend Section 1b. and propose taking seats in the “partitionist 26-County Parliament” in the same Resolution was a logical impossibility. Can anybody say that the wording: “That this Ard-Fheis drops its abstentionist attitude to Leinster House. Successful Sinn Fein parliamentary candidates in 26-County elections: a. Shall attend Leinster House as directed by the Ard Chomhairle” does not constitute the supporting and approving of the candidature of persons who intend to take their seats in Leinster House as directed by the Ard Chomhairle? Clearly Adams was in breach of Section 1b. and according to that section he had expelled himself, and all those who voted for Resolution 162. Brian Feeney, in his book, Sinn Féin 100 Turbulent Years, puts forward the argument that Adams had managed to bypass Section 1b, by introducing a motion in 1983 allowing the “discussion” of any aspect of the Sinn Féin constitution. This change may indeed have facilitated debate on abstentionism but it did not infringe on the content or effect of Section 1b in any way. To discuss something is not the same as formally proposing or supporting it. For example, conventions are held regularly where drug addiction is discussed without any of the delegates proposing or supporting it. In fact the line Adams added in 1983 was superfluous, as the Sinn Féin constitution had never banned the “discussion” of anything – just the “approving” and “supporting” of taking seats in named partitionist parliaments. Of course its not illegal to amend or remove section 1b. Section 1b. bans the approval or support of candidates who intend to take seats in British assemblies. It can be removed or amended at any Ard Fheis by a two thirds majority. The reason for doing so could be many. Perhaps delegates might feel that it implies that they cannot be trusted to be loyal to the Republic. In fact its not necessary, according to the constitution, to give any reason. But you

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

60,443,562

==Deletes== I put a speedy delete tag on the Health Sciences Centre article, I think speedy deletes are applicable to this type of situation, but the admin that looks at it will decide. Regarding the list of films/tv shot in Winnipeg, just merge in any extra information from List of films shot in Winnipeg into List of TV and films shot in Winnipeg and then List of films shot in Winnipeg can be changed into a redirect.

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

60,448,055

` ::Agreed. It's original ``analysis,`` albeit flawed, akin to original research. ==Producer credit== The primary producers on the film were Vachon, Koffler, and Wlodkowski. Jeremy Barber was listed as the sole producer, which is inaccurate and incorrect. Barber was one of three credited executive producers, which is a less important and more honorary credit than ``producer.`` I have corrected accordingly. `

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

60,449,193

== if you rreally want to beat TawkerBot to the vandalism == you should look into either WP:VandalProof, or WP:POP, besides, tawkerbot, and all it's second and third cousins only revert blankings, vandalism that doesn't remove large chunks of content, still require manual reverts

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

60,451,911

== Don't edit other user's talk page entries == I don't know what your intent was, but please don't ever do that again.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

60,459,008

*You want to build a pump that can transport billions of gallons of water to higher ground?

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

60,459,508

` == Rfa == You've answered a lot of questions on your RfA and are to be commended for it. Can I ask one more (asked here as opposed to the RfA page because it's getting crowded) that means a lot to me: You patrol CAT:CSD for a backlog, and come across this stub up for CSD A7: Doctor ABCD is a professor of medicine at University of EFGH. His area of interest is neuro-ophthalmology and he has published extensively in the field. How would you approach making the decision to delete it? Many thanks. I've reviewed all of your contributions, but, for your RfA where age vs. maturity has come up, this question will decide my ``vote``. `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

60,465,959

:I agree, but the Inland Empire has a hate crime epidemic in recent years and the majority of meth drug labs are in the High Desert (Yucca Valley/ Twentynine Palms). The region may develop a bad image as a magnet for hate groups and the rising crime rate gives us a negative name. I wish we can talk about something else, but it's an issue we must address in the Inland Empire and stop gangs, drugs or crime before it gets worse. The problem hits hard in Palm Springs, where a large gay/lesbian community lives, and Palm Desert with a large population of European Jews who are holocaust survivors. Last year, nazi gangs targeted a few black families' homes in Murrieta by hate mail and property vandalism. There's a FBI statistic on the number of members in hate groups and white supremacists live in the Menifee Valley between Perris and Lake Elsinore. Most residents like myself don't like this and oppose their racist ideology, so it's time for all of us to combat this sort of thing. +

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

60,478,207

== your very odd messages re vandalism and blocking == I think it would be as well for you to double check your info re my email address and any problems you have had/are having. To discover your messages I looked at your site for the FIRST time and can totally refute any notion that there have been dabblings with your site by myself or this aol connection. Kindly adjust your records. S Armstrong

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

60,480,451

. I'll post this suggestion at Talk:Solar cell

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

60,480,752

`Sorry, ScienceApologist, but it is true. Suggest you check out Washington DC for yourself - the capital city of the USA contains the most publically set horoscopes of all the capitals of the world. Moreover, it is a known fact that the city itself was constructed and oriented (along with major monuments, including the White House) to the cluster of main stars in the constellation Virgo. Your statement, ``by some enterprising conspiratists`` according to the facts must mean you refer to George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, Benjamin Bannacker, etc., as ``conspiracists`` because they used classical astrology for practical purposes? These are historical facts that cannot be denied ScienceApologist, and, no matter the POV, are well-known. Attempts to somehow ``deny`` the obvious is futile since these are historical and well-recorded facts. Your own ``personal view`` does not suffice to make it not so. For more, check out David Ovason's book - ``The Secret Architection of our Nation's Capital`` - `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

60,482,209

== Moving pages ? == Hi, thanks for moving the Prezista entry ... one of my firsta actions at Wikipedia was to move a page. As you can see, the history is not moved with the page when copying just the content. And ... some people really flame you for this, I will not. The next time you should maybe ask an administrator to move the history, too. Happy editing, I love Wikipedia and the collaborative work ...

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

60,483,560

they are claiming that Gorbachev apologized that accepted that Soviet crackdown on barbaric Baku was his the only and biggest mistake in his political life? Can you believe?? WHere are they taking this kind of information from? I guess they put their fingers in their rectum and get some information from there. My advice- just ignore that idiot named Grandmaster. Let him bullshit online if Wikipedia allows that. Paranoic people are all over. Azeri claims will never erase witnesses' memories. We are still alive

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

60,492,765

` == unsourced and POV information removed == I removed a considerable amount of POV, OR, opinions, and uncited/unsourced medical claims from the article. 72.154.154.40 chose to revert it, stating ``removing such a significant chunk of the page was too destructive. Can we wait for some citations before annihilating all that stuff?`` The answer is absolutely not: it wouldn't matter so much if this were an article on dog food or something, but you cannot, cannot, cannot have unsourced, uncited and misleading information regarding medical/safety/health matters. For a subject as important as this, medical advice and claims MUST be properly and responsibly sourced. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

60,493,059

You're full of shit.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

true

60,493,649

:I dunno, it could have something to do with the thousands of deaths that Falun Gong has inflicted upon our families and friends. Or maybe something to do with the pain and suffering of thousands more that Falun Gong is responsible for.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

60,494,722

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Please do not remove the bold formatting of the article name in the introductory paragraph, as you did in Gold coin - this is a standard formatting feature of all Wikipedia articles.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

60,496,136

:Very interesting! Typical for PRL ith those armchairs ;-)

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

60,501,770

::Ok, I cannot find the relevant place on their site anymore, but for the El Greco image I used and cropped, it is already on wikimedia commons here: ::http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:El_Greco_051.jpg ::For the Pericles one: ::http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Pericles.jpg ::The others are all from HM of C. I sent them an email for verification of it. It hsould come frough within the next day.

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

60,505,579

== He is Draman == Yes, there is confusion about his name because GFA misspelled his name. I talked to him on the subject and he confirmed his last name is DRAMAN. I'm not familiar with how this site works but it would be nice if his name would be writen corectly. Thank you.

2,006

false

article

random

test

false

60,511,137

==antares== this is one big motherfucker

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

true

60,515,751

:I'm trying. — Jun. 25, '06 [17:56] <[ freak]|[ talk]>

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

60,521,909

` The first V-8 engine of record was not A De Dion-Bouton but was the Antoinette V-8 of 1903 Antoinette had a 180 degrees crankshaft did all others until Wright, who was making the Hispano-Suiza of 718 cu. In. and 1124 cu. in. in about 1918 or a later wanted to put the 90 degree crankshaft into the 1124” engine but the Navy and the Army Air Corp wanted air cooled Radials so this left it up to Cadillac to do it in 1923. This is recorded in Manuel Lage’s book about Hispano-Suiza page 66, Line 10. http://www.tecsoc.org/pubs/history/2002/dec2.htm That design came from a Frenchman with a background in art, Léon-Marie-Joseph-Clement Levavasseur (1863-1922). He started work on his new engine in about 1900. His engine had eight cylinders, but instead of putting them in a straight line, Levavasseur arranged them in the shape of a ``V.`` It was a powerful and compact design, and when he received a French patent on December 2, 1902, Levavasseur became the first person to patent what we now call a V-8 engine. http://www.hubertlathamwindkiller.com/Monoplane.htm The Antoinette engine was designed and built in France by Léon Levavasseur. Named after the designer's daughter, it was Europe's most widely used engine until 1909-1910. The first Antoinette engine dated from about 1901 and was used in a speedboat. By 1905, Levavasseur had produced a water-cooled engine with eight-cylinders arranged in a 90-degree ``V`` and with direct fuel injection. It was safe, strong, and fairly powerful, generating 50 horsepower (37 kilowatts) and weighing about 110 pounds (50 kilograms). Its power-to-weight ratio was not surpassed for 25 years Antoinette VII. Designed by Léon Levavasseur, who was an artist as well as a gifted engineer, the Antoinette range possessed an almost art nouveau sense of elegance. The engine, also named 'Antoinette', came first, being designed by Levavasseur in 1903 to power motor boats. Both Santos-Dumont and the Voisins used this engine to power their early machines. The motor was of advanced design, utilizing direct fuel injection and evaporative steam cooling - which took place in long tubes fixed along the sides of the fuselage. M. L. Anderson`

2,006

false

article

blocked

test

false

60,522,611

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to User talk:Wiki alf, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

60,524,338

`:I think that we should say something about ``Culture / Community`` - certainly such sites exist, even if we need to trim some material as being speculation or unsourced. Also I don't see what's wrong with ``It is not universally recognised, but it is a well known date within the grass-roots movement of self-injury awareness.``? :: I agree a ``Culture / Community`` section is necessary and would love see a well-sourced, non-POV one. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

60,526,028

` ==Article Improvement Drive (WP:AID)== {| class=``notice noprint`` id=```` style=``background: #ffccFF; border: 1px solid #ff33FF; margin: 0 auto;`` |- | | Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.This week Epic of Gilgamesh was selected to be improved to featured article status.Hope you can help… |} `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

60,530,785

` CBDunkerson, I hope this comment on my own talk page is not considered intervention. (I see I've been unblocked.) I did not mean to suggest that MONGO was purposely inserting information as part of his job. The only reason I said ``I would not be surprised``, is because this has been going on for a while now and Wikipedia has not stopped it. What else am I to think? (Although I admit to not being familiar with Wikipedia's procedures.) Still, that comment by me is nothing compared to what MONGO's been getting away with. (Also just noticed this btw.) Wikipedia is supposed to be NPOV which is why MONGO should steer clear of the 9/11 pages. An examination of the exchanges between MONGO and myself here is a good example: MONGO seems content with personal attacks: ``who cares how many misguided folks there are``. His comments are clearly ad hominem personal attacks towards me, and many others. The following, from this page, shows he's content with namecalling as well. I removed an external link to a namecalling site, MONGO reverts me leaving the following statement: I like this weblink...it summaries things quite well I apologize for any insinuations on my part, but also must stress my own attempts at a NPOV. I'm sure we all agree, from MONGO's own statements here that he is neither apologetic nor neutral: ``The POV pushers that try to add nonsense to the articles related to the 9/11 events have been told repeatedly that the vast majority of their ``contributions`` to those article violated numerous policies. This doesn't seem to stop them. This editor I blocked routinely reverts those that support the concensus verison and yes, conspiracy theorists is what they are...they are not researchers. Simply put, and I won't apologize for this not being more civil, I will continue to block POV pushers that disrupt the discussion pages and the articles with nonsense. Two other admins responded to the unblock request and did not unblock this editor. I then moved the early parts of this conversation from an article talk page to here for all to see. It is ludicrus to assume that I was doing anything other than to ensure that the POV pushers of nonsense know that there is a limit to the level of disruption that needs to be tolerated.`` If MONGO calls this paper, which has been peer reviewed by two physicists before being accepted for publication in a book, ``nonsense``, obviously he is not NPOV `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

60,531,037

As one of the few legitimate Astrologers on Wikipedia, I should be allowed to edit the Astrology pages, especially since there are so many unethical debunker administrators who continually harrass or delete honest input.

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

60,531,264

==Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Judaism== Dear Bresolver! I have created Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Judaism. Please put it on your watchlist, and please add relevant AfD's as you find them. Cheers. - /email

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

60,531,640

`Welcome! Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so, as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and edit articles; however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is 24.211.99.183). Logging in does not require any personal details, and there are many other benefits for logging in. When you edit pages: * Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly. * Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy. * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so. * Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such content or editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism. The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. For now, if you are stuck, you can click the edit this page tab above, type {{helpme}} in the edit box, and then click Save Page; an experienced Wikipedian will be around shortly to answer any questions you may have. Also feel free to ask a question on . I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia. Slgr@ndson ( - - `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

60,533,466

`If you took a history of science course, you would know that scientists and engineers are continually inventing and refining their research tools and techniques. Rather than accusing Astrology of being a ``psuedoscience`` you should acknowledge Astrology for being the PRE-science that it is. Emperical observation finds that many (no, not all) astrological procedures work. It's not in the job description of us Astrologers to prove that Astrology is a science. But rather it's within the job description of the physical science researchers to improve the acumen of their research tools so as to discover why Astrology works. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

60,535,798

== Mosque of Babur == In Urdu the name of the Masjid is بابري and the name of Emperor Babur is بابر Therefore we can derive that Babri Masjid = Babur's Masjid or Masjid (Mosque) of Babur in english.

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

60,538,547

` == Self-aggrandizing POV? == The phrase 'self-aggrandizing' has been removed several times for two reasons: *It's [[WP:POV|POV]. *It's redundant, apparently because it's made clear by the rest of the article. I'm not sure either of these reasons are valid. What POV is the 'self-aggrandizing' phrase pushing? It doesn't seem to be something either the GNAA's supporters or detractors would disagree with, making it unclear whether or not it's POV at all. It seems to simply be an indisputable fact, evidenced by, among many other things, the article itself as well as the GNAA's website. Also, if the statement is not POV, it can't be said to be inappropriately unbalancing the article by including the POV of one side and not the other; that the GNAA are a self-aggrandizing group is a simple fact. Another reason given for the phrase's removal was that it was redundant. That might be the case, but isn't redundancy not only acceptable, but desired in the first paragraph of an article, which is generally supposed to act as a summary? I'm really not sure why this phrase is causing so much controversy. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

60,545,184

` == Damac censors the truth again == Again Damac has shown that he regards this site as his personal property. The argument I wrote under the title ``The Truth about the 1986 Sinn Féin Ard Fheis was not a party political statement but my own composition. It seems that writing any argument on Wikipedia is OK as long as it dosnt conflict with Damac's views. He gives a link to a political debate site where I also posted the same argument. Why should Wikipedia users be directed to a political debate site to read arguments that were composed for this site and then posted on the debate site. That my composition was posted here on this site can be seen by checking the time of posting my argument here and checking the time I posted it on Politics i.e. I think ``genuine Wikipedia`` users can make up their own mind about Damac's motives. Fortunately Damac's ability to censor is limited here as readers can review the history of this page by pressing the ``History`` button. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

60,549,603

when did luna mention princess saturn in the anima

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

60,550,229

William M. Connolley I have seen what has happened on this page. He keeps reverting XGustaX's edits even after XGustaX showed his facts and sources. Thanks. ( )

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

60,550,427

William M. Connolley I have seen what has happened on this page. He keeps reverting XGustaX's edits even after XGustaX showed his facts and sources. Thanks ( )

2,006

false

user

blocked

test

false

60,551,323

I also agree with XGustaX with his edits why should the Spanish peoples page not be treated like other ethic pages, the page is over sourced and has information that is clearly not 100 accurate as XgustaX sources clearly say they are wrong.

2,006

false

user

blocked

dev

false

60,552,923

` == I am ``excusing`` you == Hello, I have been at the Spanish people talk page this morning and I also the revert war that happened. I check both you and XGustaX talk pages and by what I could tell he just wanted to talk about the information that clearly is being quesioned by the articles he presented. You seem like you didn't want to listen to anything he had to say and just excused him of all sorts of things. That is what i am excusing you of. His articles are properly sourced and you dismissed them even still he had two of them and you still went out this rampage. I told William what I saw today with you and XGustaX. ( )`

2,006

false

user

blocked

dev

false

60,554,077

== Does suicide constitute defenestration? == I've seen the term used many times before in the context of throwing oneself from a window, including several examples within this very article. However, it seems a tad difficult to literally throw your own body in such a fashion. Is it proper, then, to cite defenstration for the act of jumping through said window? AWF

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

60,555,188

:: Godfrey_Daniel: Even though you may disagree with an editor on a personal level I still think you should explain why this attack should be listed. It seems AlanzoB has a valid point above, especially in regards to a lack of polticians even mentioning what should beif it's terrorisma major terrorist attack on our soil.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

60,562,816

` —The preceding unsigned comment was added by • . ::I'm not sure I get your point. Readers of Wikipedia aren't required to be familiar with all of its policies and guidelines, and so it can't be assumed that they will know about the notability requirements, which are in fact only a guideline. Moreover, there are plenty of organizations which don't go out of their way to publicize themselves yet are still notable, and aggrandizing connotates way more than just publicity. Including 'self-aggrandizing' doesn't at all suggest that that's their primary motive. As well, there could be notable trolls or notable trolling groups who don't self-aggrandize, and certainly not to the extent and in the joie de vire manner the GNAA does. Indeed, many trolling groups and individuals try to obscure or hide the fact that they're trolls, which often makes their activities more successful. Therefore, phrase is clearly relevant and not POV. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

60,575,459

Let me state once again that my edits take place ONLY in the intersection of upsetting Amy and improving Wikipedia. If my edits are frivolous or poor, or if you can cite misbehaviour, I'm open to correction.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

60,577,205

` == Sinn Féin 1986 Ard Fheis post not a ``Party Political Statement`` but a personal view == The argument I wrote under the title ``The Truth about the 1986 Sinn Féin Ard Fheis`` was not a party political statement but my own composition. As I am not even a member of any political party it is difficult to see how my contribution could be regarded as a ``Party Political statement.`` An editor deleted my argument and gives a link to a political debate site where I also posted the same argument. Why should Wikipedia users be directed to a political debate site to read arguments that were composed for this site and then, later, posted on the debate site. That my composition was posted first here on this site can be seen by checking the time of posting my argument here and checking the time I posted it on Politics i.e. I think ``genuine Wikipedia`` users can make up their own mind about the motives for deleteing my composition. Needless to say it casts doubt on the accuracy of the Wikipedia ``Republican Sinn Féin`` article. Fortunately readers can review the history of this page by pressing the ``History`` button.`

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

60,591,676

Everyone shut up i havnt been here for hours and when i return DEBATE this argument is over like that one man said

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

60,591,678

===Her Album Sales= Hard Core has sold 2.2 million copies in US and over five million worldwide. The Notorious KIm hassold 1.5 million units since 2000. La Bella Mafia has sold 1.3 million units The Naked Truth has sold almost 400 thousand copies. You guys are constantly changing the article, my gosh, I don't know what to beleive

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

60,591,898

I think we should steer away from the gallery look. It is generally regarded as a sign of a lack imagination, where one can just plonk any old pic there without editing them carefully into the article's text. In my experience, galleries are frowned upon & usually are forced to be deleted during FAC or peer review. For now it should stay until more text is created to place the pics in, but after that, or if it is up for FAC, the gallery should be deleted...

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

60,592,708

1.As we all know In his heart freeza feared the saiyans he wanted to SLIGHTLY exagerate his powerlevel so that Gohan and vegeta couldnt have confidence he is simply trying to intimidate the z senshi so that no one would have confidence and the slightest chance there is a group of fans that actually believs he is lying you know. 2.he could be refering to his fourth form 100% form his maximum power in the series

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

60,593,215

I'm not your son, you crazy bugger.

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

true

60,593,323

DONT MESS WITH AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANY ARTICLE I CREATE AND IS MINE

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

60,594,723

You both are a bit rude please do not get yourself banned you do not want that do you

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

60,595,382

He just MIGHT have been telling the truth but i doubt it

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

60,595,431

` :First, it is not a clay model. Second, please don't double-post. You've already said this and no one has responded to it. Third, see the above discussion, and it would be appreciated if you were to contribute to it. -) `

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

60,595,492

quite all right your cause is noble

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

60,596,637

Yes iam sorry you were not apologized to sir

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

60,596,886

Very but its a problem

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

60,597,019

Dont invade my life

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

60,598,122

You arrogant administrator homosexual bastards fuck off

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

true

60,598,831

Fucking administrators DAMN YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

true

60,599,368

:No prob and thanks.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

60,602,938

:I disagree with the it being PD-usgov. I don't see any indication of it being taken by an employee of the united states Federal government.

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

60,607,710

You should note the reasons I removed what I removed. Allegations of ties (involvement even?) to terrorism is a pretty serious matter. I deleted allegations that were either 1) refuted by more reliable and current sources (I assumed documents published with the support of Congress in Feb 2006 were more reliable than a magazine website that published articles on the same matter in 2001), 2) inconsistent with the sources actually cited (most of the indictments listed did not involve CAIR, and several allegations of indictment weren't sourced at all), and 3) editorial content that seemed to be founded in the writer's own opinion rather than sourced data. You suggested the information I deleted were 'important'. The information were pungent statements indicative of highly criminal acts on the part of CAIR, info which would have been noteworthy had they been properly documented and cited. Much of that information is refutable with more reliable sources, such as publications produced by the US government. Please discuss before further reverts.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

60,608,561

==CAIR== I noticed your comment on another user's talk page, who in turn spoke to me. Please do not encourage POV-driven participation, and do not make unfounded allegations of POV-bias. Please take note of WP:AGF, WP:NPOV, and WP:RS. Information in an article which can potentially be called slander if unfounded needs to be supported with highly credible sources. Too much of the information you've re-added are unsourced, others are supported by sources that don't speak to the content you're adding. Do not use content from sources and then draw your own interpretations of what they mean. Also, bear in mind that sources that come from editorials or opinion pieces need to be represented in the article as opinions, not relayed as fact. This is particularly the case when the source has a clearly partisan allegience.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

60,612,232

==Gilles Tréhin== I have listed this article at WP:DRV for possible undeletion based on information I have received regarding a book that has been written by Trehin about his fictional city, Urville. Interested parties should contribute to the discussion. ==Is this still deserving of featured article status?== I'm beginning to think that this article should be removed from the list of featured articles. It seems to me that political ideas and attempts to be politically correct have compromised the factual veracity of this article. This should be a pretty straightforward article about a neurological disorder like epilepsy or aphasia. Instead, it reads as if Asperger syndrome is either some kind of blessing or lifestyle choice and that there are negligible drawbacks to having it. The very fact that many of the participants on the talk page take issue or offense at even calling AS a disorder or disease when it is viewed as such by the medical community is rather telling. I really think the mainstream medical and scientific view should be emphasized, as medicine and science strive to have the neutral point of view that this article lacks. I'm not looking for an argument. I'm simply warning those interested that if this article stays as it is I will probably lobby to have it removed as a featured article.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

60,615,396

:::You are a vandal, you removed the reference to chapter 291 even tho i edited not to violate the copyright. Also there is no speculation again. You are the dick, not me.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

true

60,617,527

:::::You have obviously no argument to justify your vandalism and censorship attempt, except that you are logged-in. Can I laugh at your stupidity. There is no copyright infrigment nor speculation in what i posted. You just want to censor elements that don't please you. You are trying to CENSOR elements of the bio.

2,006

false

article

blocked

test

true

60,623,968

` Hi, Petedavo, Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like this place — I sure do — and want to stay. Before getting too in-depth, you may want to read about the Five pillars of Wikipedia and simplified ruleset. If you need help on how to title new articles check out the naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. If you need help look at Wikipedia:Help and the FAQ , plus if you can't find your answer there, check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. And if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will be by to help you shortly. - ====Additional tips==== Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia! *If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you. *You can sign your name using three tildes (~). If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Five will get you the datestamp only. *You may want to add yourself to the new user log. *If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted. *If you're still entirely confused, or would like to get a better grasp of your wikipedia skills, and you have an IRC client (or don't mind getting one), check out the Bootcamp. It's not what it sounds like, but it is fun and can help you with your editing skills. *If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal. Happy Wiki-ing. — Click here to respond to this message! `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

60,626,152

== ==

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

60,627,379

` == Hogwarts Daily AFD == Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem to me that Hogwarts Daily meets these criteria, I have started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted. Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hogwarts Daily. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the ``articles for deletion`` template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, an administrator will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article.`

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

60,628,577

` == From the german Wiki: Schrein des Buches == Hello Yurik. As I know the ``Shrine of the book`` is only a part of the Israel Museum. You translated my hebrew and engish bots in ``Israel Museum`` (en) and מוזיאון ישראל (he) instead of ``Shrine of the book`` (the article exists by the way also in the english Wiki) and היכל הספר. I suppose you know the difference between the israel museum and the shrine. Why did you change the bots? Please answer it here or on my discussion site. Thanx Trinityfolium`

2,006

false

user

random

train

false

60,637,546

` :This is just my opinion, but I don't think ``School counselor`` is of wide enough interest. `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

60,643,121

:Sorry, I have merged the two together, I just thought it was a bit rude.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

60,643,237

` :::::Thank you Alphachimp. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

60,649,012

` == Oh, for heavens' sake! == Honestly, I'm sick of edit wars like this. Can't we just use correct English? If you are insistent on calling it ``A train station or railroad station (or, in British English, a railway station)`` (to quote an old version of the main article), why not divide Wikipedia in two, with http://usa.wikipedia.org for those of you who believe that American English is the best form of English and http://en.wikipedia.org for those of us who like to use PROPER ENGLISH! .`

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

60,650,785

`and likely will be for the forseeable future), shouldn't ``train station`` come first with ``railway station`` and ``railroad station`` offered as alternatives? — :Well, yes - however, doesn't seem to like ``train station`` (apparently on the grounds that American English is ``incorrect``). I've tidied this up now for consistency. == That endless debate... == In my view this article should be at Station, and the other meanings listed at Station (disambiguation). This would be consistent with both normal English usage (US and British) and n ormal Wikipedia practice. And the objections are?... == Oh, for heavens' sake! == Honestly, I'm sick of edit wars like this. Can't we just use correct English? If you are insistent on calling it ``A train station or railroad station (or, in British English, a railway station)`` (to quote an old version of the main article), why not divide Wikipedia in two, with http://usa.wikipedia.org for those of you who believe that American English is the best form of English and http://en.wikipedia.org for those of us who like to use PROPER ENGLISH! .`

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

60,654,612

==Dismal's Paradox on deletion review== An editor has asked for a deletion review of Dismal's Paradox. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

60,656,786

DESTROY the animations! They chew up bandwidth and wreck the page load time. The page is big enough with all the TeX symbols, the other fancy graphics are overkill.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

60,658,748

==Nicolau dos Reis Lobato== You: Saw your work on this page. Thanks for dropping by. 26 June 2006 (UTC) Me: Thank you. It was rather small. But you know: Small is beautiful. Please remain in touch.

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

60,673,038

June 2006 (UTC) On top of everything, your admonition to me seems to be license for IronDuke to continue making personal attacks on me like this: . Unless you can convince him to stop making unjustified and unproven allegations, I will continue removing the personal attack. 15:48, 26

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

60,673,356

`* *Democracy *Democracy (varieties) *History of democracy *Democratic capitalism *Grassroots democracy *Illiberal democracy *Jacksonian democracy *Jeffersonian democracy *Multiparty democracy *New Democracy *Parliamentary democracy *Social democracy *Totalitarian democracy *Workplace democracy *Procedural democracy *Emerging democracy *Liberal democracy *Islamic democracy *Democracy watch *Inclusive Democracy *democracy (word) *Republican democracy *Socialist Democracy *Industrial democracy *Free Democracy *Basis democracy *Constitutional democracy *Real Democracy *Democracy & Nature *Democracy Movement *Liquid democracy *Internet democracy *Messianic democracy *Cultural democracy *Emergent democracy * *Democracy Records and of course: *Democracy: An American Novel *Democracy (video platform) In the ``See also`` section: *Demarchy *Dominant-party system *First Party System, Second Party System, and Third Party System *Party-list proportional representation *Sortition *Westminster system`

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

60,673,360

::::: True, but did you read the sentence before this?

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false