dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
60,673,449	... (personal attack removed) ...	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
60,675,259	`, 26 June 2006 (UTC) Sorry, but you go to far in protecting IronDuke. I haven't edited the page in question since you asked me to stop, but you allow him to replace the attack. WP:NPA says: ``Specific examples of personal attacks include but are not limited to: Accusatory comments such as ``Bob is a troll``, or ``Jane is a bad editor`` can be considered personal attacks if said repeatedly, in bad faith, or with sufficient venom. This situation clearly qualifies. And WP:RPA says that I can refactor to eliminate the personal attack. I have done so. It isn't an edit war. In any case, you can stop it by the simple act of telling IronDuke to stop accusing me of being a sockpuppet. If he had evidence or you thought it was true, I would be banned by now, no doubt. What I am asking is simple fairness I have (reluctantly) done as you asked, now don't create a free field for attacking accusations. 16:02`	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
60,676,164	except for vandalism, which is what you are doing.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
60,676,914	I suggest you get some mental help.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	true
60,677,332	Get yourself some help.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
60,678,025	Sorry, I do not respond to trolls.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
60,678,713	OH really?? 19 years old is not that young for Chess. And your hope is far far away from the mastery of Levon Aronian or even Armenia's number 4 Gabriel Sargissyan.	2,006	false	article	blocked	dev	false
60,678,964	By the way, are there any Azeris looking like this guy. Having lived among the Jews for a long time I can declare that this guy is a Jew. He is a typical Gorsky Jew.	2,006	false	article	blocked	dev	false
60,680,142	NPOV Tag? An NPOV tag with no talk page? Huh?	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
60,681,570	::::Nice source, good work.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
60,684,993	Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
60,689,952	== why was my edit deleted? == on ebaumss world.....this information is 100% correct and was recently in the news.	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
60,690,818	` == Atheist Family First Members & Candidates == Yesterday I added a sentence about Atheist members and candidates, that was queried and later deleted since I last logged in. I cannot find a record of my edits in the history, and my sentence is gone from the article. To paraphrase myself, I said that ``A significant number of Family First members and candidates identify as non-Christian and/or Atheist``, and this statement is evidenced by the fact that I happen to be one of those Atheist (nominally Buddhist) FF members. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
60,691,099	which has now been removed	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
60,692,099	== Are you sure about this guy's views? == The article states he's a homophobe. The picture on the article shows otherwise, unless he happens to be the biggest metrosexual known to man. Seriously, this guy has to be gay, otherwise remove the picture of him and his wife. Both give the impression that Strom is a gay man who married a very ugly woman to maintain the facade of a heterosexual male. Once again, just want to state that I'm pretty sure Kevin Alfred Strom is gay, (not that there's anything wrong with it) so you may want to reconsider editing edits that claim homosexuality, they could be correct.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
60,692,366	`:::::::: Ok, we dont share common terminology: Linotype / standards body = geeks (for me). Thus, the article clearly states that the word ``caron`` was created by some ``geeks``. Remember we are talking language here, not typography. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
60,696,854	The Kurds are an Iranian people it speaking Iranian language. The Kurds have Iranian culture and them are proud on its Iranian origin (I am an Iranian Kurd from Iraq: Excuse they for my bad one English).	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
60,700,921	` == Fiefdom == For the record, I have been threatened by administrators with blocking for discussing this topic. ``Fiefdom`` is the only word that applies. ( `	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
60,703,167	:Thanks for the list guidelines (which are not written in stone). Now try explaining which of these: ::Disruption ::Sysops may block IP addresses or usernames that disrupt the normal functioning of Wikipedia, or pose any kind of threat to it. Such disruption may include (but is not limited to) changing other users' signed comments, making deliberately misleading edits, harassment, excessive personal attacks, and inserting material that may be defamatory. Users will normally be warned before they are blocked. ::Sysops may also block new user accounts that make lots of disruptive edits. Reincarnations of blocked disruptive users are likely to be re-blocked, particularly if they edit in a way that suggests they are likely to continue being disruptive. :...I violated. Having a different opinion from you is not a violation of Wikipedia policy and not grounds for continuing to violate official policy against Wikipedia:Harrassment. Have a good day. Regards,	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
60,703,428	== Your a tool == http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tool	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
60,710,852	` ::With all due respect, your comments about me ``taking the legal route`` are amusing. The administrators here are hypocrites. Guidelines, instructions, and policies for you all are fluid and subject to interpretation (and if anyone questions this they are called ``ninnes``), but the same said policies are written in stone for other editors with threats of blocking if we even so much as approach violating the spirit of a guideline never mind a policy. This is farsical. Raul can go on enforcing his fluid FA guidelines and you can continue threatening people for pointing out the emperor has no clothes. I'm restricting my activity to watching the articles I wrote. Ciao, `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
60,716,208	`Swiss== *ChwiB (chwib) (UK) Derived from a misunderstanding of the abbreviation ``CH`` (Confoederatio Helvetica) and a misapplication of the German s-z (ß), which is not used in Swiss German and in any case would not be applied to the English term ``Swiss``. ==`	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
60,717,351	Roman Catholics i'm not accusing you but i think you're a fenian. You are ugly and probably the seventh born in a family. You have probably been molested at some point by a priest. You disgust me. SIEG HEIL!	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	true
60,719,054	== Terryeo editing again? == Hey..... I saw your observation that the anon IP that recently edited Altered texts in Scientology doctrine was making the exact same point that Terryeo has been making on the talk page... I checked the IP, and sure enough, the anon IP is 65.147.84.76, which comes from the same block of Qwest servers as Terryeo's IP (which he publicly displayed recently as being 65.146.30.209).	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
60,721,464	` :::We've mentioned before that putting facts in an article asserts, to some extent, their notability. Surely doing an entire article about these controversies would be doing so excessively. My suggestion is that we try to strike a reasonable length-balance as a crude way of keeping things in perspective. :::As I write this, the ``Controversies`` section is 1,128 words. Background is 477, Recognition is 179, Ideas is 517, Political Career is 455 (total 2,756). So the Controversies are more than twice as long as any other section, and make up 41% of the entire body text. :::Here's just a number I'm throwing out: Let's try to bring controversies to 600 words. It would still be the longest section, and take up 29% of the body text, but it would certainly be much fairer than the present situation. - `	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
60,726,350	==PDP-11's Influence on the Design of C== At the top of the article, it is mentioned that the PDP-11's instruction set influenced the design of C. However, I do not see any evidence to support this claim given in the article. Could someone who knows what these alleged connections are possibly add a section about them?	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
60,731,514	` *Behinderte Russen: Meaning ``Retarded Russians``, used in Switzerland following the defeat of the Swiss team in the 2006 World Cup. Derived from the stereotype that Ukrainians are similar to Russians, but mentally retarded and facially similar to those afflicted with Down's Syndrome. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	true
60,732,806	the most subtle questions they possibly could.	2,006	false	article	blocked	test	false
60,733,402	` Fourth Examination, 17th December, 1455. [Additional statements.] The sum of a thousand pounds, or crowns, was given by the King of England for the surrender of the Maid; and an annuity of 300 pounds to the soldier of the Duke of Burgundy who had captured her. I was appointed notary in the Trial, together with a certain Guillaume Boisguillaume. The copy of the Process was shown to me is the true Copy made. I acknowledge my own and my companion's signatures, and that it is the truth. Two other copies were made. One was given to the Inquisitor, one to the King of England, and one to the Bishop of Beauvais. This Process was made from a certain Minute written in French, by my own hand, which was given up to the Judges, and was afterwards translated from the French into Latin by Monsieur Thomas de Courcelles and myself, in the form in which it now stands, as well and as faithfully as possible, long after the death and execution of Jeanne. As for the Act of Accusation and other parts of the Process, Maitre Thomas de Courcelles had very little to do with these, nor did he greatly interfere with them. With regard to the word Nota, written above certain Articles in the Minute, there was, on the first day of the Inquiry, a great tumult in the Chapel of the Castle at Rouen, where, that day, the interrogation was held, so that Jeanne was interrupted at almost every word, while she was speaking of her apparitions: Certain secretaries were there-two or three-of the King of England, who registered, as they chose, her words and depositions, omitting all her defense and all which tended to exonerate her. I complained of this, saying it was irregular, and that I would not be responsible, as clerk, in this matter: and, therefore, on the morrow, the place of meeting was changed and convened in a certain hall of the Castle, near the Great Hall, while two English were placed to keep order. When there were difficulties as to Jeanne's answers, and some said she had not replied as I had written, I wrote Nota at the top, in order that the questions might be repeated and the difficulties removed. Although it is mentioned in the Process that the Judges stated they had received preliminary evidence, I do not remember to have seen or heard of it; but I know that, if it had been produced, it would have been inserted in the Process. Jeanne was brought to Rouen and not to Paris, because, as I think, the King of England and the principal people of his Council were there. At the beginning of the Process, I was sent for to attend a meeting held at a certain house near the Castle, at which were present the Bishop of Beauvais, the Abbe' of Fecamp, Maitre Nicolas Loyseleur, and many others. The Bishop told me it was necessary that I should serve the King: that they meant to bring a fine case against this said Jeanne, and that I was to recommend another greffier to assist me. I therefore nominated Boisguillaume. I met Lohier in the Church, on the day after the Bishop had asked him to give an opinion on the Process, and inquired what he you ght of it. He replied, that the Process was of no value, and could not be maintained, because it was conducted in the Castle and not in a legal court; that it concerned many who were not summoned; that Jeanne had no Counsel: and for many other reasons. He added that, in his opinion, it was their intention to put her to death. A certain Maitre Nicolas de Houppeville was summoned to attend the Trial; and was in great danger, because he refused. Maitre Jean Lemaitre, Sub-Inquisitor, delayed as long as possible his attendance at the Trial, and was much vexed at being compelled to attend. One day, when Jeanne was being questioned, Jean de Chatillon spoke in her favor, saying that she was not compelled to reply to the question put to her, or to that effect. This much displeased the Bishop of Beauvais and his following, and there was a great tumult at his words. The Bishop ordered him to be quiet, and to let the Judges speak. On another occasion, when some one was advising and directing Jeanne on the question of submission to the Church, the Bishop said, ``Hold your tongue, in the devil's name!`` I do not remember the name of him who was thus spoken to. One day, some one, whose name I do not remember, having spoken of Jeanne in a way which did not please the Earl of Stafford, the latter followed him, sword in hand, to some place of sanctuary; and, if they had not told Stafford that that place was sacred, he would have slain him. Those who seemed to me most affected [against Jeanne] were Beaupere, Midi, and de Touraine. One day, I went with the Bishop of Beauvais and the Earl of Warwick to the prison where Jeanne was, and we found her in irons. It was said that at night she was fastened with iron chains; but I did not see her so fas	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
60,734,802	IDIOT== WHY'D YOU DELETE MY ARTICLE FUCKER? ==	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	true
60,738,355	. is my official enemy of Wikipedia world	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
60,739,313	` ::::Please just ignore whatever Rdos says. It's better if we just ignore him and revert his edits on sight. He has proven that he is not interested in doing anything but promoting his ``Aspie-quiz`` and his website. Pretending he doesn't exist will save a lot of time and grief. Don't take the bait, don't respond to him, don't engage him. Let's just fix this article in spite of Rdos, rather than with help from Rdos. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
60,739,984	` ``If anyone does not make senses or say stupid thing to you when he or she is your boss or manager, do not let them do to you, have talk with a big boss to insult her or him back!`` April 2005 - Cculber007 to Goody's Corporation `	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
60,741,051	can we lave the article alone now until the verdict comes in this week.	2,006	false	article	blocked	dev	false
60,768,172	`==Types== {\| width=100% class=``wikitable`` \| valign=top width=33% \| ===Hair ornaments=== hairpins ===Head ornaments=== crowns circlets coronets diadems tiaras earrings magnetic earrings clip-on earrings earcuffs nose-jewels body piercing jewellery non-piercing body jewellery ===Neck=== necklaces chokers ===Arms=== armlets (upper arm bracelets) bracelets cuff links \| valign=top width=34% \| ===Hands=== rings promise rings engagement rings wedding rings class rings *championship rings ===Body=== belly chains brooches chatelaines ===Legs and Feet=== thighbands anklets (ankle bracelets) toe rings ===Genital jewellery=== Prince Albert piercings Prince's Wands anal jewellery \| valign=top width=33% \| ===Special functions=== celibacy vow rings signet rings thumb rings puzzle rings medical alert jewellery mourning jewellery amulets prayer jewellery japa malas prayer beads prayer ropes rosary beads puzzle jewellery ===Components=== cameos emblems lockets medallions pendants *Findings \|} I placed this here until my editing of the article is complete... `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
60,768,675	` == Timeline == This is a timeline of jewellery production from the first uses of metal in history to the Renaissance. * 7000 BC - Uses of copper in Anatolia, Iran and Eastern Europe. * 5000 BC - Uses of copper in Egypt. * 4000 BC - Smelting technology for copper in Egypt and Iran. * 3450 BC - Use of natural zinc/copper alloy in Egypt. * 3500 BC - Gold makes an appearance in Egyptian jewellery. * 3000 BC - Egypt and Iran makeing simple hammered iron beads * 3000 BC - The Middle East employ semi-mass-production * 2000 BC - First signs of the swagging technique * 2600 BC - Beaded wires began to be used. * 2500 BC - Egyptians using copper/lead alloys. * 2500 BC - True iron production technology in Near East. * 2500 BC - The intentional addition of silver and copper to gold. * 2500 BC - Gold wires are characterised by seam lines that follow a spiral path along the wire. * 2000 BC - Use of patterned punches * 1500 BC - Earplugs and earrings become popular in Egypt. * 1400 BC - Egypt Amarna period, using resin and mud for repoussé backing. * 1400 BC - Deliberate addition of zinc to copper in Canaan. * 1400 BC - Philistines have iron. * 1400 BC - Very copper rich gold alloys popular in Egypt. * 1000 BC - Persian sheet bronze work 0.05mm thick. * 1000 BC - The start of true engraving. * 900 BC - The Greeks have iron. * 700 BC - World's oldest coinage in Lydia. * 575 BC - In Greece, jewellery is still very rare. * 500 BC - Hafted hammers were being used in some parts. * 500 BC - Iron in use in the British Isles * 400 BC - Greeks using Beeswax for filler in repoussé. * 350 BC - Use of combined punches and dies of bronze. * 325 BC - Animal or human-headed hoop earrings were popular. * 300 BC - Diadems are first seen. * 300 BC - Red Coral popular in Celtic jewellery. * AD 50 - Start of the Roman period, where addition of silver to gold becomes almost unknown. * AD 100 - Sulphur fills hollow gold items throughout the Roman Empire. * AD 150 - Tin rings found in Nubia * AD 300 - Lead becomes more common in places. * AD 400 - Pewter jewellery is made. * AD 400 - A shale die is found on Great Britain. * AD 1500 - The Renaissance * AD 1900 - Art Nouveau jewellery ==Famous jewellers== * Elias Akaoui founder of Akaoui stores in Cairo, Egypt. * Paolo Bulgari Chairman of Bulgari. * Pierre Cartier Co-founder of Cartier SA * Peter Carl Fabergé Russian jeweller best known for the fabulous Fabergé eggs * Ian Harris Jewellery expert to the BBC's Antiques Roadshow, Director of N. Bloom & Son * Scott Kay Founder of Scott Kay Inc., a bridal jewelry company. * Kenneth Jay Lane founder of Kenneth Jay Lane, Inc. * Robert Lee Morris influential in the jewelry-as-art movement * Charles Lewis Tiffany founder of Tiffany & Co.. * Sotirios Voulgaris founder of Bulgari. == Sound of jewellery == The sound of jewellery has played an enermous part in many stories, poems, and religious literature (more details and sources to come). Different jewellery creates different sounds, ie plastic bangles create a high pitched clink sound, while others such as baxelite produce a ``clunck`` sound. Knowing how a particular piece of jewellery sounds can help someone identify whether or not a piece of jewellery is fake. Indeed people have written about the sound of ``fake gold``, and jewel makers such as Sharon Alouf, a famous jeweler have praised the high frequency pitched noise of gold bangles(most likely real gold she is wearing). To this day, the jeweler claims, ``the sound of bangles clinking together is very soothing to me. It always reminds me of motherhood.``Alouf is even partial to particular tones. ``Gold produces my favorite sound,`` she says, ``the pitch is higher and clearer, which I find energizing.`` `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
60,769,861	` == You are wrong, he did not listen to me == I have to remove his illegal warning because I have a permission from Wikipedia in Florida. He committed a crime by making discriminating and he failed to listening to me so I have to call Wikipedia again tomorrow to file a complaint against him and I am going to sue him. do you want to join him? I was very angry when he called pages ``my private pages`` which are not mine. I want these illegal warnings be removed or I will ask wikipedia to do. [user:cculber007]`	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
60,770,146	` == Civility == Regarding this edit: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Additionally: Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thanks. :Firstly, removing warnings is considered vandalism and a sign of bad faith. Secondly, saying ``X is my enemy is not appropriate anywhere on wikipedia. Consider this your last warning. ::Please stop. If you continue to remove warning messages from your talk page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thanks, and happy editing! `	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
60,770,776	::That's not true at all! There's a lot of diversity of accepted views here. Wikipedia is a place where there's great harmony and cooperation among neo-cons, Isreali-Likkudists, and conspiracy-bashing pseudo-leftists like Chip Berlet -)	2,006	false	article	blocked	dev	false
60,771,351	` == Mediation case: Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-06-19 Banu Nadir == I'd just like to make sure we're on the same page: When the mediation is finished, we're limited to requesting that Pschemp remove the protection. As none of us are admins or higher in the food chain, and MedCab is completely unoffocial, we have no authority to simply state ``we'll have protection removed``. Also, I'd already released Pschemp from mediation, so please allow her to continue her regular duties until such time as the case is finished and protection actually needs to be lifted. Thanks! ~Kylu (\| `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
60,773,179	` Please note that warnings are sanctioned by WP. Also see WP:NLT. Thanks and happy editing! `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
60,774,057	).Mike 23:21, 26 June 2006	2,006	false	article	random	train	false
60,776,013	== Rhymefest version? == A solo verse written and performed by Rhymefest was cut from the song's final version. Did Rhymefest appeared in the final version? 20:38 PST June 26, 2006	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
60,776,210	I dont give a damn anymore. heres a personal attack on wikipedia- GO FUCK YOURSELF	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	true
60,776,844	Since this is MY user page, I can say what I want: YOU GUYS ARE ALL A BUNCH OF MOTHERFUCKING ASS-EATERS AND I HOPE YOU ALL ROT IN HELL.	2,006	false	user	blocked	test	true
60,777,143	Am I not allowed to write on my own user page?!?!?!!	2,006	false	user	blocked	test	false
60,777,255	Question: Am I not allowed to edit my own userpage as I see fit? Why did you delete what I wrote? Aren't you infringing on my first amendment rights?	2,006	false	user	blocked	dev	false
60,778,759	` ::Felonious Monk, you can kiss my hairy Jewish ass! If your nose wasn't burried so deep in Chip Berlet's nut sack then you might actually have a bit of a sense of hummor and not be all anal about your precious Wiki-beuracracy. Go ahead and block my IP if you like, I really don't give a shit about you or Wikipedia. I can switch my IP address in two seconds anyhow. Or block my IP-range if you like - I fuckin dare you to! I'm switching internet providers tomorrow anyway, so it won't affect me, it will just keep a bunch of other people from editing your wannabe ``encyclopedia,`` which is A-OK with me! `	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	true
60,778,857	` ==Objectivity== I read a few things about this guy. I do not care for his political ideals. I'm just wondering, should a guy with political affiliations write articles? How will he be objective? Why not just get another guy to write the articles? Is Wikipedia only going to allow people with the ``right`` politics (i.e. liberal) to write articles? ::That's not true at all! There's a lot of diversity of accepted views here. Wikipedia is a place where there's great harmony and cooperation among neo-cons, Isreali-Likkudists, and conspiracy-bashing pseudo-leftists like Chip Berlet -) :::Anonymous cheap shots. You folks must be very proud. Such courage. ::Well I thought my ``cheap shot`` was funny, but I wonder what that says about you Mr. Berlet, that you feel compelled to respond to every anon IP on Wikipedia... Doesn't sound like your ego's very secure to me. Aren't you too busy doing hatchet jobs on folks like David Ray Griffin to waste your time with nobodies like us??? I guess maybe it's a good think you're so involved with Wikipedia since it takes so much of your time away from other nefarious activities -)`	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
60,779,113	==The Falling Man== We've got a lot of pictures on this page. Does anybody object to the removal of that one? I know it has meaning and stuff, but it seems excessive for it to be on the page. It's like a shock photo. Graphic and disturbing. I think we should just link to it's page.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
60,779,626	==Responce== I am JimJones005 and I just wanted to say that User:67.101.77.46 just coppied and pasted my warning of his(her?) vandalisim of the takeover article onto my user page. I don't know why editors insist on punishing people who make good faith edits to add to wikipedia with warnings and the deletion of their facts. We all might disagree sometimes, especialy since anything Non-Dom always seems to get deleted, but I hope you will understand. I'm going to re-insert the so called vandalism back in there tomorrow, and if you, or anyone else reverts it, I will call upon an admin. I like to think that you were just confused as to what was actualy going on, and happen to be on the wrong side of this insident. At any rate, sorry for the misspellings (native tongue is Hebrew).	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
60,783,344	No way, I'm not getting into Ed again. This starting to get haywire. This conflict is terrible. But you are right, and I didn't mean for it to sound like everyone was. I can see for myself who was and who wasn't. But he was given too much leeway as compared to everyone else. EngineerED- who's next, ChooChooCharlie?	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
60,784,473	Ok. I don't feel that strongly that it should be removed. But, just so you know what I mean, in the case of the torture photos I think the graphic imagery is more pertinent to the article. The imagery is the proof, and the imagery is what caused the controversy. I think this is different. I don't think anyone would argue that we need severed limbs or entrails in this article either.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
60,784,792	` == Cool (aesthetic)== Or something spelt like that...You sent a message to my IP account, (I apparently forgot to log in) that I had changed something on the ``Cool`` page...Unless it was my brother which is highly unlikely, I don't think it was I who changed it, as I have never visited that page on Wikipedia. And this edit appears under a page Stillwater Area High School. What cool has anything to do with it, I'm not sure.`	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
60,794,082	:I counted 34/55 around the outside and added it to the article.	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
60,797,587	``` template to the article Inure, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Inure. If you remove the template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.`	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
60,801,454	== RR == Randy Rhoads was born on December 6, 1956. This coincides with the release date of RR on December 6, 2006.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
60,803,863	== Hi == I hope you come back soon an become admin. I had to delete 500 things today.'''''' \|	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
60,805,630	June 2006 (UTC) :::The mention of the Aus v Italy game should state that the final penalty kick was HIGHLY DISPUTED, and considered dubious by most observers of the game. 08:38, 27	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
60,805,945	::The article suggests that Family First is a Christian organisation, and infers that non-Christians are not welcome. This is clearly not true, by the very fact that there are not only non-Christian members, but non-Christian candidates.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
60,807,484	June 2006 (UTC) :::Discussing Australia's loss, and Cantalejo's role in it IS improving the article. I think his actions at WC2006 raise a number of significant questions, and I think this article SHOULD discuss them. 08:59, 27	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
60,819,578	I agree with the critical stance part, what we need is contemporary documentation from church authorities investigating it.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
60,820,896	== Cleanup? == The article is tagged as needing a cleanup. I can't see anything wrong with it. Shall I remove the notice?	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
60,822,312	(and nobody objects that those two refer to the same thing)	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
60,823,351	== Admins == Hey, we aren't that bad! I promise you that no admin is going to have a go at you for making a mistake, or a misunderstanding of policy. If one ever does, please let me know so I can have a quiet word. -	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
60,824,426	== He's a Troll == doesn't apparently know the difference between a sockpuppet and a (formerly) anonymous user, doesn't know the difference between a difference of opinion and wikistalking, and perhaps doesn't know he's being a WP:TROLL. (I've tried to revert his personal attack several times, so I give up, except he'll remove this, more than sufficient evidence of his double-standard.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
60,826,323	How dare you threaten to block me? Do you know who I am, I am John Jacob Astor, 3rd Baron Astor of Hever not only a succesful buisnessman but also a member of the HOUSE OF LORDS! I will not tolerate this behaviour and will take further action with the law courts of England, which you being Americans, have no idea about our soceity and the way we live. You have made a terrible mistake and would never dream of vandilising, which, because of you Americans, we now have vandilisism in England. But I would never take part in such crime. Baron Astor of Hever	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
60,833,618	` :::Yes, ``Chadian-Libyan conflict`` is probably better, at least to start with. If/when the article gets too large, one can then break out parts of it into individual articles. `	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
60,834,334	` Pharos may not have used ``brooklyn on line`` as a source, but Howrealisreal did, and Pharos used wikipedia's brooklyn article as a source link and if you read that article you will see that some of the ``factual`` information is from ``brooklyn on line``. (By the way, as for IP addresses, I guess pharo is a newbie as well...fyi IP addresses registered to AOL are shared by multiple users.).Jess 09:32, 27 June 2006`	2,006	false	article	blocked	test	false
60,843,127	This article is biased against 97.7.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
60,844,505	== Taj Mahal == salam http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taj_Mahal:_The_True_Story	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
60,847,887	` Marx and Weber do not even have sections of there own in this article! The article does have a section on Marxian approaches - which is not the same as Marx. It also has a section on the German/Austrian historical school. Comparing the IEF with Marxian approaches is mixing apples and oranges. You need to learn to distinguish between theoretical approaches and specific methods and instruments, they are on analyticially distinct levels. A particular method is a subset of a theoretical approach (You could instead have written, ``I could use exactly the same argument to state that Paul Willis's ethnographic study, Learning to labor should not have a section of its own. And you know what? You would be right! Like the IEF, Willis's ethnographic study should not have its own section in this article). The substantive claims underlying the IEF, that identifies capitalism with freedom, come directly out of the German/Austrian set of approahces (which is already in the article). Let's just put a link in that section to this one (of hundreds if not thousands) of attempts to turn a school of thought into a quantitiative instrument. \| `	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
60,851,366	== Re:Edits by 81.19.57.170 == It was edits like this that made me think 'this is not simple vandalism'. Some of the other edits like , at a quick glance didn't look like vandalism either. On closer look I can see how they can be seen as unhelpful edits, but blocks in response to AIV reports are usually only for clear, obvious, 'right now' vandalism. As to how to deal with editors like this... It can be tricky, and the response depends on the balance of good, bad and indifferent edits. If there are a significant number of good edits, might be best just to keep a good eye on the contribs and revert the bad ones. If you find yourself continually reverting the same bad ones then a block for disruption might be in order. That may or may not have the effect of getting them to discuss things.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
60,859,055	Wrong Phonetics This wade-giles thing is just wrong phonetics. A common mistake is that the /zh/ in Chinese /pinyin/ is pronounced /j/ not /ch/. The stupidity of the English inventor is just beyond me.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
60,865,259	== Protein/Animo Acid section == I agree amino acids and nucleic acis would provide very little benefit to hair. And whole protein molecules would be too large to enter the cuticle. But the section seems to want to argue about permanently bonding new amino acids to hair, which of course isn't going to happen in dead cells. But I haven't seen any conditioner or shampoo marketed as permanently improving hair. Adding hydrolized protein bits that are cationically charged will help temporarily improve the look of damaged or fine fine (until its washed again).	2,006	false	article	random	test	false
60,875,503	:If any admin happens to read this officious-impersonating statement by Askolnick, check notice-board::investigation for background.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
60,876,766	`:Homey, what I get that you either misunderstand what I am referring to, or that you refuse to get it. I am talking about this edit, the first one you made after your 48-hour block. You removed what was then the second paragraph of the article, with an edit summary referring to a ``consensus.`` At the time of the alleged previous ``consensus,`` the intro was only one paragraph. Between that time and the time of the edit in question, a second (and I believe a third) paragraph had been added to the intro, otherwise you couldn't have removed it. The ``consensus`` concerned only the first paragraph. So that's my final answer. Say what you want about this, I am not responding to it. I also don't see why you posted essentially the same thing here and on my talk page. I read this page, so you only need to post it here. `	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
60,878,465	/. Also /j/in Chinese Pinyin is /z/ not /j	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
60,879,025	== Askolnick et al == What happens if Andrew doesn't (constructivelly) engage in the dispute resolution initiated by myself? Will the article remain frozen? For how long? Is he and his kind going to beat the system/your attempt to find resolution by now staying away - simply to return when the article's protection level is lowered again (at which time their editorial crippling and threats to fellow editors will come back in full swing)?	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
60,893,222	I have deleted this false attribution.	2,006	false	article	random	train	false
60,894,814	` == Civility == Regarding this edit: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Additionally: Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thanks. :Firstly, removing warnings is considered vandalism and a sign of bad faith. Secondly, saying ``X is my enemy is not appropriate anywhere on wikipedia. Consider this your last warning. ::Please stop. If you continue to remove warning messages from your talk page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thanks, and happy editing! You have now been blocked indefinatly for making legal threats and claiming falsely that you have some sort of authority from ``wikipedia``, as you did here. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
60,897,344	`==Your edit== Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. `	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
60,897,567	'']] - 27 June 2006, 03:24 PM.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
60,897,884	== Biodegradable/degradable polythene film == I saw your note at Biodegradable/degradable polythene film. I agree that the redirect may not have been the best idea, so I restored it to the earlier version (nothing had been deleted, it was still saved in the article's history). I do think it really needs some cleanup though.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
60,898,003	:::::i will revert. since people must be able to come with one click to the dist cat to than click to the next dist. i use cats a lot, have the old skin. you hinder my browsing. further: looking in the pages section of the dist cat will leave people without seeing that there is an ubunut article and the ubuntu is a linux dist. ubuntu as subcat does not bring this. Ubuntu as a dist is at the same level as the other dists. that it has it s own cat should not move it away from the other. samsara, as per your edit summary: this is not a complete end of hierarchical categorizatiion.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
60,910,614	Change nom to háček (with diacritics) per comments bellow.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
60,912,490	` :I know SNOW isn't a policy. My only point is that there is never a chance that an article called ``How to burn DVDs`` would ever pass an AFD. It would be a collossal waste of time. Not only that, the article fails NPOV, NOR, NOT and likely a dozen other content guidelines. If I were to go though and remove all the un-verified material I could mark it DB Empty. Should I just do that? - \| `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
60,913,267	`) ::::From the article on AC: ``However, there are schools of mathematical thought, primarily within set theory, that either reject the axiom of choice or investigate consequences of axioms inconsistent with AC.`` While it has never been conclusively proven or disproven, in many mathematical disciplines is taken to be true. [ ] (UTC`	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
60,913,431	OK, I assumed blocked meant blocked I didn't know I could edit here. But I can't respond on WP:ANI that is where the real discussion is going on!	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
60,915,645	I've used a series of anon IPs I don't keep track of which ones they are, but (I suppose you'll just block all of these) they include 88.149.150.47, 83.211.48.173, 83.77.214.114, 84.162.18.6, 63.203.204.231, 24.57.143.66 and others. I've never used another named account.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
60,921,768	I hope you people don't mind but, in the finel episode of Sonic X Rouge states she is going to work with Sonic and the gang, and she had a necklace with a pruple heart and trimming	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
60,924,219	` My Delphi helpfile says that I must declare my routines with the ``Safecall`` convention if it is to support both compile time binding and runtime binding through COM automation. Not sure if this is used outside Delphi... `	2,006	false	article	random	train	false
60,924,245	== ARE YOU NUTS == WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU VANDALISING several articles BY REMOVING LINKS?! i mean guru and dj premier use your brain first if you got any, remove links then	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	true
60,925,293	`the ``wikipedia sucks`` url will disappear in the blink of an eye. `	2,006	false	user	blocked	dev	true
60,926,954	== fucking == faggot hopefully somone rapes or eats you soon you fucking idiot	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	true
60,927,374	== fuck you == youfuckingidiot	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	true
60,927,453	== stupid == assholes never die rightß INSTEAD; THEY BECOME WACKPEDIA ADMINS: DIE	2,006	false	user	blocked	dev	true
60,927,662	Please drop it. It's over.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
60,927,979	== you stupid whore == will never get it will you? doesnt fit in your tiny wakpedia wimp err admin brain fuck you asshole	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	true
60,928,746	== who are you == to tell me anything about personal attacks? fuck you	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	true

60,673,449

... (personal attack removed) ...

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

60,675,259

`, 26 June 2006 (UTC) Sorry, but you go to far in protecting IronDuke. I haven't edited the page in question since you asked me to stop, but you allow him to replace the attack. WP:NPA says: ``Specific examples of personal attacks include but are not limited to: Accusatory comments such as ``Bob is a troll``, or ``Jane is a bad editor`` can be considered personal attacks if said repeatedly, in bad faith, or with sufficient venom. This situation clearly qualifies. And WP:RPA says that I can refactor to eliminate the personal attack. I have done so. It isn't an edit war. In any case, you can stop it by the simple act of telling IronDuke to stop accusing me of being a sockpuppet. If he had evidence or you thought it was true, I would be banned by now, no doubt. What I am asking is simple fairness I have (reluctantly) done as you asked, now don't create a free field for attacking accusations. 16:02`

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

60,676,164

except for vandalism, which is what you are doing.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

60,676,914

I suggest you get some mental help.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

true

60,677,332

Get yourself some help.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

60,678,025

Sorry, I do not respond to trolls.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

60,678,713

OH really?? 19 years old is not that young for Chess. And your hope is far far away from the mastery of Levon Aronian or even Armenia's number 4 Gabriel Sargissyan.

2,006

false

article

blocked

dev

false

60,678,964

By the way, are there any Azeris looking like this guy. Having lived among the Jews for a long time I can declare that this guy is a Jew. He is a typical Gorsky Jew.

2,006

false

article

blocked

dev

false

60,680,142

NPOV Tag? An NPOV tag with no talk page? Huh?

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

60,681,570

::::Nice source, good work.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

60,684,993

Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: *The five pillars of Wikipedia *How to edit a page *Help pages *Tutorial *How to write a great article *Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

60,689,952

== why was my edit deleted? == on ebaumss world.....this information is 100% correct and was recently in the news.

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

60,690,818

` == Atheist Family First Members & Candidates == Yesterday I added a sentence about Atheist members and candidates, that was queried and later deleted since I last logged in. I cannot find a record of my edits in the history, and my sentence is gone from the article. To paraphrase myself, I said that ``A significant number of Family First members and candidates identify as non-Christian and/or Atheist``, and this statement is evidenced by the fact that I happen to be one of those Atheist (nominally Buddhist) FF members. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

60,691,099

which has now been removed

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

60,692,099

== Are you sure about this guy's views? == The article states he's a homophobe. The picture on the article shows otherwise, unless he happens to be the biggest metrosexual known to man. Seriously, this guy has to be gay, otherwise remove the picture of him and his wife. Both give the impression that Strom is a gay man who married a very ugly woman to maintain the facade of a heterosexual male. Once again, just want to state that I'm pretty sure Kevin Alfred Strom is gay, (not that there's anything wrong with it) so you may want to reconsider editing edits that claim homosexuality, they could be correct.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

60,692,366

`:::::::: Ok, we dont share common terminology: Linotype / standards body = geeks (for me). Thus, the article clearly states that the word ``caron`` was created by some ``geeks``. Remember we are talking language here, not typography. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

60,696,854

The Kurds are an Iranian people it speaking Iranian language. The Kurds have Iranian culture and them are proud on its Iranian origin (I am an Iranian Kurd from Iraq: Excuse they for my bad one English).

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

60,700,921

` == Fiefdom == For the record, I have been threatened by administrators with blocking for discussing this topic. ``Fiefdom`` is the only word that applies. ( `

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

60,703,167

:Thanks for the list guidelines (which are not written in stone). Now try explaining which of these: ::Disruption ::Sysops may block IP addresses or usernames that disrupt the normal functioning of Wikipedia, or pose any kind of threat to it. Such disruption may include (but is not limited to) changing other users' signed comments, making deliberately misleading edits, harassment, excessive personal attacks, and inserting material that may be defamatory. Users will normally be warned before they are blocked. ::Sysops may also block new user accounts that make lots of disruptive edits. Reincarnations of blocked disruptive users are likely to be re-blocked, particularly if they edit in a way that suggests they are likely to continue being disruptive. :...I violated. Having a different opinion from you is not a violation of Wikipedia policy and not grounds for continuing to violate official policy against Wikipedia:Harrassment. Have a good day. Regards,

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

60,703,428

== Your a tool == http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tool

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

60,710,852

` ::With all due respect, your comments about me ``taking the legal route`` are amusing. The administrators here are hypocrites. Guidelines, instructions, and policies for you all are fluid and subject to interpretation (and if anyone questions this they are called ``ninnes``), but the same said policies are written in stone for other editors with threats of blocking if we even so much as approach violating the spirit of a guideline never mind a policy. This is farsical. Raul can go on enforcing his fluid FA guidelines and you can continue threatening people for pointing out the emperor has no clothes. I'm restricting my activity to watching the articles I wrote. Ciao, `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

60,716,208

`Swiss== *ChwiB (chwib) (UK) Derived from a misunderstanding of the abbreviation ``CH`` (Confoederatio Helvetica) and a misapplication of the German s-z (ß), which is not used in Swiss German and in any case would not be applied to the English term ``Swiss``. ==`

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

60,717,351

Roman Catholics i'm not accusing you but i think you're a fenian. You are ugly and probably the seventh born in a family. You have probably been molested at some point by a priest. You disgust me. SIEG HEIL!

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

true

60,719,054

== Terryeo editing again? == Hey..... I saw your observation that the anon IP that recently edited Altered texts in Scientology doctrine was making the exact same point that Terryeo has been making on the talk page... I checked the IP, and sure enough, the anon IP is 65.147.84.76, which comes from the same block of Qwest servers as Terryeo's IP (which he publicly displayed recently as being 65.146.30.209).

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

60,721,464

` :::We've mentioned before that putting facts in an article asserts, to some extent, their notability. Surely doing an entire article about these controversies would be doing so excessively. My suggestion is that we try to strike a reasonable length-balance as a crude way of keeping things in perspective. :::As I write this, the ``Controversies`` section is 1,128 words. Background is 477, Recognition is 179, Ideas is 517, Political Career is 455 (total 2,756). So the Controversies are more than twice as long as any other section, and make up 41% of the entire body text. :::Here's just a number I'm throwing out: Let's try to bring controversies to 600 words. It would still be the longest section, and take up 29% of the body text, but it would certainly be much fairer than the present situation. - `

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

60,726,350

==PDP-11's Influence on the Design of C== At the top of the article, it is mentioned that the PDP-11's instruction set influenced the design of C. However, I do not see any evidence to support this claim given in the article. Could someone who knows what these alleged connections are possibly add a section about them?

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

60,731,514

` *Behinderte Russen: Meaning ``Retarded Russians``, used in Switzerland following the defeat of the Swiss team in the 2006 World Cup. Derived from the stereotype that Ukrainians are similar to Russians, but mentally retarded and facially similar to those afflicted with Down's Syndrome. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

true

60,732,806

the most subtle questions they possibly could.

2,006

false

article

blocked

test

false

60,733,402

` Fourth Examination, 17th December, 1455. [Additional statements.] The sum of a thousand pounds, or crowns, was given by the King of England for the surrender of the Maid; and an annuity of 300 pounds to the soldier of the Duke of Burgundy who had captured her. I was appointed notary in the Trial, together with a certain Guillaume Boisguillaume. The copy of the Process was shown to me is the true Copy made. I acknowledge my own and my companion's signatures, and that it is the truth. Two other copies were made. One was given to the Inquisitor, one to the King of England, and one to the Bishop of Beauvais. This Process was made from a certain Minute written in French, by my own hand, which was given up to the Judges, and was afterwards translated from the French into Latin by Monsieur Thomas de Courcelles and myself, in the form in which it now stands, as well and as faithfully as possible, long after the death and execution of Jeanne. As for the Act of Accusation and other parts of the Process, Maitre Thomas de Courcelles had very little to do with these, nor did he greatly interfere with them. With regard to the word Nota, written above certain Articles in the Minute, there was, on the first day of the Inquiry, a great tumult in the Chapel of the Castle at Rouen, where, that day, the interrogation was held, so that Jeanne was interrupted at almost every word, while she was speaking of her apparitions: Certain secretaries were there-two or three-of the King of England, who registered, as they chose, her words and depositions, omitting all her defense and all which tended to exonerate her. I complained of this, saying it was irregular, and that I would not be responsible, as clerk, in this matter: and, therefore, on the morrow, the place of meeting was changed and convened in a certain hall of the Castle, near the Great Hall, while two English were placed to keep order. When there were difficulties as to Jeanne's answers, and some said she had not replied as I had written, I wrote Nota at the top, in order that the questions might be repeated and the difficulties removed. Although it is mentioned in the Process that the Judges stated they had received preliminary evidence, I do not remember to have seen or heard of it; but I know that, if it had been produced, it would have been inserted in the Process. Jeanne was brought to Rouen and not to Paris, because, as I think, the King of England and the principal people of his Council were there. At the beginning of the Process, I was sent for to attend a meeting held at a certain house near the Castle, at which were present the Bishop of Beauvais, the Abbe' of Fecamp, Maitre Nicolas Loyseleur, and many others. The Bishop told me it was necessary that I should serve the King: that they meant to bring a fine case against this said Jeanne, and that I was to recommend another greffier to assist me. I therefore nominated Boisguillaume. I met Lohier in the Church, on the day after the Bishop had asked him to give an opinion on the Process, and inquired what he you ght of it. He replied, that the Process was of no value, and could not be maintained, because it was conducted in the Castle and not in a legal court; that it concerned many who were not summoned; that Jeanne had no Counsel: and for many other reasons. He added that, in his opinion, it was their intention to put her to death. A certain Maitre Nicolas de Houppeville was summoned to attend the Trial; and was in great danger, because he refused. Maitre Jean Lemaitre, Sub-Inquisitor, delayed as long as possible his attendance at the Trial, and was much vexed at being compelled to attend. One day, when Jeanne was being questioned, Jean de Chatillon spoke in her favor, saying that she was not compelled to reply to the question put to her, or to that effect. This much displeased the Bishop of Beauvais and his following, and there was a great tumult at his words. The Bishop ordered him to be quiet, and to let the Judges speak. On another occasion, when some one was advising and directing Jeanne on the question of submission to the Church, the Bishop said, ``Hold your tongue, in the devil's name!`` I do not remember the name of him who was thus spoken to. One day, some one, whose name I do not remember, having spoken of Jeanne in a way which did not please the Earl of Stafford, the latter followed him, sword in hand, to some place of sanctuary; and, if they had not told Stafford that that place was sacred, he would have slain him. Those who seemed to me most affected [against Jeanne] were Beaupere, Midi, and de Touraine. One day, I went with the Bishop of Beauvais and the Earl of Warwick to the prison where Jeanne was, and we found her in irons. It was said that at night she was fastened with iron chains; but I did not see her so fas

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

60,734,802

IDIOT== WHY'D YOU DELETE MY ARTICLE FUCKER? ==

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

true

60,738,355

. is my official enemy of Wikipedia world

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

60,739,313

` ::::Please just ignore whatever Rdos says. It's better if we just ignore him and revert his edits on sight. He has proven that he is not interested in doing anything but promoting his ``Aspie-quiz`` and his website. Pretending he doesn't exist will save a lot of time and grief. Don't take the bait, don't respond to him, don't engage him. Let's just fix this article in spite of Rdos, rather than with help from Rdos. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

60,739,984

` ``If anyone does not make senses or say stupid thing to you when he or she is your boss or manager, do not let them do to you, have talk with a big boss to insult her or him back!`` April 2005 - Cculber007 to Goody's Corporation `

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

60,741,051

can we lave the article alone now until the verdict comes in this week.

2,006

false

article

blocked

dev

false

60,768,172

`==Types== {| width=100% class=``wikitable`` | valign=top width=33% | ===Hair ornaments=== *hairpins ===Head ornaments=== *crowns **circlets **coronets **diadems **tiaras *earrings **magnetic earrings **clip-on earrings **earcuffs *nose-jewels *body piercing jewellery *non-piercing body jewellery ===Neck=== *necklaces *chokers ===Arms=== *armlets (upper arm bracelets) *bracelets *cuff links | valign=top width=34% | ===Hands=== *rings **promise rings **engagement rings **wedding rings **class rings **championship rings ===Body=== *belly chains *brooches *chatelaines ===Legs and Feet=== *thighbands *anklets (ankle bracelets) *toe rings ===Genital jewellery=== *Prince Albert piercings *Prince's Wands *anal jewellery | valign=top width=33% | ===Special functions=== *celibacy vow rings *signet rings *thumb rings *puzzle rings *medical alert jewellery *mourning jewellery *amulets *prayer jewellery **japa malas **prayer beads **prayer ropes **rosary beads *puzzle jewellery ===Components=== *cameos *emblems *lockets *medallions *pendants *Findings |} I placed this here until my editing of the article is complete... `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

60,768,675

` == Timeline == This is a timeline of jewellery production from the first uses of metal in history to the Renaissance. * 7000 BC - Uses of copper in Anatolia, Iran and Eastern Europe. * 5000 BC - Uses of copper in Egypt. * 4000 BC - Smelting technology for copper in Egypt and Iran. * 3450 BC - Use of natural zinc/copper alloy in Egypt. * 3500 BC - Gold makes an appearance in Egyptian jewellery. * 3000 BC - Egypt and Iran makeing simple hammered iron beads * 3000 BC - The Middle East employ semi-mass-production * 2000 BC - First signs of the swagging technique * 2600 BC - Beaded wires began to be used. * 2500 BC - Egyptians using copper/lead alloys. * 2500 BC - True iron production technology in Near East. * 2500 BC - The intentional addition of silver and copper to gold. * 2500 BC - Gold wires are characterised by seam lines that follow a spiral path along the wire. * 2000 BC - Use of patterned punches * 1500 BC - Earplugs and earrings become popular in Egypt. * 1400 BC - Egypt Amarna period, using resin and mud for repoussé backing. * 1400 BC - Deliberate addition of zinc to copper in Canaan. * 1400 BC - Philistines have iron. * 1400 BC - Very copper rich gold alloys popular in Egypt. * 1000 BC - Persian sheet bronze work 0.05mm thick. * 1000 BC - The start of true engraving. * 900 BC - The Greeks have iron. * 700 BC - World's oldest coinage in Lydia. * 575 BC - In Greece, jewellery is still very rare. * 500 BC - Hafted hammers were being used in some parts. * 500 BC - Iron in use in the British Isles * 400 BC - Greeks using Beeswax for filler in repoussé. * 350 BC - Use of combined punches and dies of bronze. * 325 BC - Animal or human-headed hoop earrings were popular. * 300 BC - Diadems are first seen. * 300 BC - Red Coral popular in Celtic jewellery. * AD 50 - Start of the Roman period, where addition of silver to gold becomes almost unknown. * AD 100 - Sulphur fills hollow gold items throughout the Roman Empire. * AD 150 - Tin rings found in Nubia * AD 300 - Lead becomes more common in places. * AD 400 - Pewter jewellery is made. * AD 400 - A shale die is found on Great Britain. * AD 1500 - The Renaissance * AD 1900 - Art Nouveau jewellery ==Famous jewellers== * Elias Akaoui founder of Akaoui stores in Cairo, Egypt. * Paolo Bulgari Chairman of Bulgari. * Pierre Cartier Co-founder of Cartier SA * Peter Carl Fabergé Russian jeweller best known for the fabulous Fabergé eggs * Ian Harris Jewellery expert to the BBC's Antiques Roadshow, Director of N. Bloom & Son * Scott Kay Founder of Scott Kay Inc., a bridal jewelry company. * Kenneth Jay Lane founder of Kenneth Jay Lane, Inc. * Robert Lee Morris influential in the jewelry-as-art movement * Charles Lewis Tiffany founder of Tiffany & Co.. * Sotirios Voulgaris founder of Bulgari. == Sound of jewellery == The sound of jewellery has played an enermous part in many stories, poems, and religious literature (more details and sources to come). Different jewellery creates different sounds, ie plastic bangles create a high pitched clink sound, while others such as baxelite produce a ``clunck`` sound. Knowing how a particular piece of jewellery sounds can help someone identify whether or not a piece of jewellery is fake. Indeed people have written about the sound of ``fake gold``, and jewel makers such as Sharon Alouf, a famous jeweler have praised the high frequency pitched noise of gold bangles(most likely real gold she is wearing). To this day, the jeweler claims, ``the sound of bangles clinking together is very soothing to me. It always reminds me of motherhood.``Alouf is even partial to particular tones. ``Gold produces my favorite sound,`` she says, ``the pitch is higher and clearer, which I find energizing.`` `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

60,769,861

` == You are wrong, he did not listen to me == I have to remove his illegal warning because I have a permission from Wikipedia in Florida. He committed a crime by making discriminating and he failed to listening to me so I have to call Wikipedia again tomorrow to file a complaint against him and I am going to sue him. do you want to join him? I was very angry when he called pages ``my private pages`` which are not mine. I want these illegal warnings be removed or I will ask wikipedia to do. [user:cculber007]`

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

60,770,146

` == Civility == Regarding this edit: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Additionally: Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thanks. :Firstly, removing warnings is considered vandalism and a sign of bad faith. Secondly, saying ``X is my enemy is not appropriate anywhere on wikipedia. Consider this your last warning. ::Please stop. If you continue to remove warning messages from your talk page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thanks, and happy editing! `

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

60,770,776

::That's not true at all! There's a lot of diversity of accepted views here. Wikipedia is a place where there's great harmony and cooperation among neo-cons, Isreali-Likkudists, and conspiracy-bashing pseudo-leftists like Chip Berlet -)

2,006

false

article

blocked

dev

false

60,771,351

` == Mediation case: Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-06-19 Banu Nadir == I'd just like to make sure we're on the same page: When the mediation is finished, we're limited to requesting that Pschemp remove the protection. As none of us are admins or higher in the food chain, and MedCab is completely unoffocial, we have no authority to simply state ``we'll have protection removed``. Also, I'd already released Pschemp from mediation, so please allow her to continue her regular duties until such time as the case is finished and protection actually needs to be lifted. Thanks! ~Kylu (| `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

60,773,179

` Please note that warnings are sanctioned by WP. Also see WP:NLT. Thanks and happy editing! `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

60,774,057

).Mike 23:21, 26 June 2006

2,006

false

article

random

train

false

60,776,013

== Rhymefest version? == A solo verse written and performed by Rhymefest was cut from the song's final version. Did Rhymefest appeared in the final version? 20:38 PST June 26, 2006

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

60,776,210

I dont give a damn anymore. heres a personal attack on wikipedia- GO FUCK YOURSELF

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

true

60,776,844

Since this is MY user page, I can say what I want: YOU GUYS ARE ALL A BUNCH OF MOTHERFUCKING ASS-EATERS AND I HOPE YOU ALL ROT IN HELL.

2,006

false

user

blocked

test

true

60,777,143

Am I not allowed to write on my own user page?!?!?!!

2,006

false

user

blocked

test

false

60,777,255

Question: Am I not allowed to edit my own userpage as I see fit? Why did you delete what I wrote? Aren't you infringing on my first amendment rights?

2,006

false

user

blocked

dev

false

60,778,759

` ::Felonious Monk, you can kiss my hairy Jewish ass! If your nose wasn't burried so deep in Chip Berlet's nut sack then you might actually have a bit of a sense of hummor and not be all anal about your precious Wiki-beuracracy. Go ahead and block my IP if you like, I really don't give a shit about you or Wikipedia. I can switch my IP address in two seconds anyhow. Or block my IP-range if you like - I fuckin dare you to! I'm switching internet providers tomorrow anyway, so it won't affect me, it will just keep a bunch of other people from editing your wannabe ``encyclopedia,`` which is A-OK with me! `

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

true

60,778,857

` ==Objectivity== I read a few things about this guy. I do not care for his political ideals. I'm just wondering, should a guy with political affiliations write articles? How will he be objective? Why not just get another guy to write the articles? Is Wikipedia only going to allow people with the ``right`` politics (i.e. liberal) to write articles? ::That's not true at all! There's a lot of diversity of accepted views here. Wikipedia is a place where there's great harmony and cooperation among neo-cons, Isreali-Likkudists, and conspiracy-bashing pseudo-leftists like Chip Berlet -) :::Anonymous cheap shots. You folks must be very proud. Such courage. ::Well I thought my ``cheap shot`` was funny, but I wonder what that says about you Mr. Berlet, that you feel compelled to respond to every anon IP on Wikipedia... Doesn't sound like your ego's very secure to me. Aren't you too busy doing hatchet jobs on folks like David Ray Griffin to waste your time with nobodies like us??? I guess maybe it's a good think you're so involved with Wikipedia since it takes so much of your time away from other nefarious activities -)`

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

60,779,113

==The Falling Man== We've got a lot of pictures on this page. Does anybody object to the removal of that one? I know it has meaning and stuff, but it seems excessive for it to be on the page. It's like a shock photo. Graphic and disturbing. I think we should just link to it's page.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

60,779,626

==Responce== I am JimJones005 and I just wanted to say that User:67.101.77.46 just coppied and pasted my warning of his(her?) vandalisim of the takeover article onto my user page. I don't know why editors insist on punishing people who make good faith edits to add to wikipedia with warnings and the deletion of their facts. We all might disagree sometimes, especialy since anything Non-Dom always seems to get deleted, but I hope you will understand. I'm going to re-insert the so called vandalism back in there tomorrow, and if you, or anyone else reverts it, I will call upon an admin. I like to think that you were just confused as to what was actualy going on, and happen to be on the wrong side of this insident. At any rate, sorry for the misspellings (native tongue is Hebrew).

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

60,783,344

No way, I'm not getting into Ed again. This starting to get haywire. This conflict is terrible. But you are right, and I didn't mean for it to sound like everyone was. I can see for myself who was and who wasn't. But he was given too much leeway as compared to everyone else. EngineerED- who's next, ChooChooCharlie?

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

60,784,473

Ok. I don't feel that strongly that it should be removed. But, just so you know what I mean, in the case of the torture photos I think the graphic imagery is more pertinent to the article. The imagery is the proof, and the imagery is what caused the controversy. I think this is different. I don't think anyone would argue that we need severed limbs or entrails in this article either.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

60,784,792

` == Cool (aesthetic)== Or something spelt like that...You sent a message to my IP account, (I apparently forgot to log in) that I had changed something on the ``Cool`` page...Unless it was my brother which is highly unlikely, I don't think it was I who changed it, as I have never visited that page on Wikipedia. And this edit appears under a page Stillwater Area High School. What cool has anything to do with it, I'm not sure.`

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

60,794,082

:I counted 34/55 around the outside and added it to the article.

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

60,797,587

``` template to the article Inure, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Inure. If you remove the template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.`

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

60,801,454

== RR == Randy Rhoads was born on December 6, 1956. This coincides with the release date of RR on December 6, 2006.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

60,803,863

== Hi == I hope you come back soon an become admin. I had to delete 500 things today.'''''' |

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

60,805,630

June 2006 (UTC) :::The mention of the Aus v Italy game should state that the final penalty kick was HIGHLY DISPUTED, and considered dubious by most observers of the game. 08:38, 27

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

60,805,945

::The article suggests that Family First is a Christian organisation, and infers that non-Christians are not welcome. This is clearly not true, by the very fact that there are not only non-Christian members, but non-Christian candidates.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

60,807,484

June 2006 (UTC) :::Discussing Australia's loss, and Cantalejo's role in it IS improving the article. I think his actions at WC2006 raise a number of significant questions, and I think this article SHOULD discuss them. 08:59, 27

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

60,819,578

I agree with the critical stance part, what we need is contemporary documentation from church authorities investigating it.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

60,820,896

== Cleanup? == The article is tagged as needing a cleanup. I can't see anything wrong with it. Shall I remove the notice?

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

60,822,312

(and nobody objects that those two refer to the same thing)

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

60,823,351

== Admins == Hey, we aren't that bad! I promise you that no admin is going to have a go at you for making a mistake, or a misunderstanding of policy. If one ever does, please let me know so I can have a quiet word. -

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

60,824,426

== He's a Troll == doesn't apparently know the difference between a sockpuppet and a (formerly) anonymous user, doesn't know the difference between a difference of opinion and wikistalking, and perhaps doesn't know he's being a WP:TROLL. (I've tried to revert his personal attack several times, so I give up, except he'll remove this, more than sufficient evidence of his double-standard.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

60,826,323

How dare you threaten to block me? Do you know who I am, I am John Jacob Astor, 3rd Baron Astor of Hever not only a succesful buisnessman but also a member of the HOUSE OF LORDS! I will not tolerate this behaviour and will take further action with the law courts of England, which you being Americans, have no idea about our soceity and the way we live. You have made a terrible mistake and would never dream of vandilising, which, because of you Americans, we now have vandilisism in England. But I would never take part in such crime. Baron Astor of Hever

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

60,833,618

` :::Yes, ``Chadian-Libyan conflict`` is probably better, at least to start with. If/when the article gets too large, one can then break out parts of it into individual articles. `

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

60,834,334

` Pharos may not have used ``brooklyn on line`` as a source, but Howrealisreal did, and Pharos used wikipedia's brooklyn article as a source link and if you read that article you will see that some of the ``factual`` information is from ``brooklyn on line``. (By the way, as for IP addresses, I guess pharo is a newbie as well...fyi IP addresses registered to AOL are shared by multiple users.).Jess 09:32, 27 June 2006`

2,006

false

article

blocked

test

false

60,843,127

This article is biased against 97.7.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

60,844,505

== Taj Mahal == salam http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taj_Mahal:_The_True_Story

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

60,847,887

` Marx and Weber do not even have sections of there own in this article! The article does have a section on Marxian approaches - which is not the same as Marx. It also has a section on the German/Austrian historical school. Comparing the IEF with Marxian approaches is mixing apples and oranges. You need to learn to distinguish between theoretical approaches and specific methods and instruments, they are on analyticially distinct levels. A particular method is a subset of a theoretical approach (You could instead have written, ``I could use exactly the same argument to state that Paul Willis's ethnographic study, Learning to labor should not have a section of its own. And you know what? You would be right! Like the IEF, Willis's ethnographic study should not have its own section in this article). The substantive claims underlying the IEF, that identifies capitalism with freedom, come directly out of the German/Austrian set of approahces (which is already in the article). Let's just put a link in that section to this one (of hundreds if not thousands) of attempts to turn a school of thought into a quantitiative instrument. | `

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

60,851,366

== Re:Edits by 81.19.57.170 == It was edits like this that made me think 'this is not simple vandalism'. Some of the other edits like , at a quick glance didn't look like vandalism either. On closer look I can see how they can be seen as unhelpful edits, but blocks in response to AIV reports are usually only for clear, obvious, 'right now' vandalism. As to how to deal with editors like this... It can be tricky, and the response depends on the balance of good, bad and indifferent edits. If there are a significant number of good edits, might be best just to keep a good eye on the contribs and revert the bad ones. If you find yourself continually reverting the same bad ones then a block for disruption might be in order. That may or may not have the effect of getting them to discuss things.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

60,859,055

Wrong Phonetics This wade-giles thing is just wrong phonetics. A common mistake is that the /zh/ in Chinese /pinyin/ is pronounced /j/ not /ch/. The stupidity of the English inventor is just beyond me.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

60,865,259

== Protein/Animo Acid section == I agree amino acids and nucleic acis would provide very little benefit to hair. And whole protein molecules would be too large to enter the cuticle. But the section seems to want to argue about *permanently* bonding new amino acids to hair, which of course isn't going to happen in dead cells. But I haven't seen any conditioner or shampoo marketed as permanently improving hair. Adding hydrolized protein bits that are cationically charged will help temporarily improve the look of damaged or fine fine (until its washed again).

2,006

false

article

random

test

false

60,875,503

:If any admin happens to read this officious-impersonating statement by Askolnick, check notice-board::investigation for background.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

60,876,766

`:Homey, what I get that you either misunderstand what I am referring to, or that you refuse to get it. I am talking about this edit, the first one you made after your 48-hour block. You removed what was then the second paragraph of the article, with an edit summary referring to a ``consensus.`` At the time of the alleged previous ``consensus,`` the intro was only one paragraph. Between that time and the time of the edit in question, a second (and I believe a third) paragraph had been added to the intro, otherwise you couldn't have removed it. The ``consensus`` concerned only the first paragraph. So that's my final answer. Say what you want about this, I am not responding to it. I also don't see why you posted essentially the same thing here and on my talk page. I read this page, so you only need to post it here. `

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

60,878,465

/. Also /j/in Chinese Pinyin is /z/ not /j

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

60,879,025

== Askolnick et al == What happens if Andrew doesn't (constructivelly) engage in the dispute resolution initiated by myself? Will the article remain frozen? For how long? Is he and his kind going to beat the system/your attempt to find resolution by now staying away - simply to return when the article's protection level is lowered again (at which time their editorial crippling and threats to fellow editors will come back in full swing)?

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

60,893,222

I have deleted this false attribution.

2,006

false

article

random

train

false

60,894,814

` == Civility == Regarding this edit: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Additionally: Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thanks. :Firstly, removing warnings is considered vandalism and a sign of bad faith. Secondly, saying ``X is my enemy is not appropriate anywhere on wikipedia. Consider this your last warning. ::Please stop. If you continue to remove warning messages from your talk page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thanks, and happy editing! You have now been blocked indefinatly for making legal threats and claiming falsely that you have some sort of authority from ``wikipedia``, as you did here. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

60,897,344

`==Your edit== Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. `

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

60,897,567

'']] - 27 June 2006, 03:24 PM.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

60,897,884

== Biodegradable/degradable polythene film == I saw your note at Biodegradable/degradable polythene film. I agree that the redirect may not have been the best idea, so I restored it to the earlier version (nothing had been deleted, it was still saved in the article's history). I do think it really needs some cleanup though.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

60,898,003

:::::i will revert. since people must be able to come with one click to the dist cat to than click to the next dist. i use cats a lot, have the old skin. you hinder my browsing. further: looking in the pages section of the dist cat will leave people without seeing that there is an ubunut article and the ubuntu is a linux dist. ubuntu as subcat does not bring this. Ubuntu as a dist is at the same level as the other dists. that it has it s own cat should not move it away from the other. samsara, as per your edit summary: this is not a complete end of hierarchical categorizatiion.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

60,910,614

Change nom to háček (with diacritics) per comments bellow.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

60,912,490

` :I know SNOW isn't a policy. My only point is that there is never a chance that an article called ``How to burn DVDs`` would ever pass an AFD. It would be a collossal waste of time. Not only that, the article fails NPOV, NOR, NOT and likely a dozen other content guidelines. If I were to go though and remove all the un-verified material I could mark it DB Empty. Should I just do that? - | `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

60,913,267

`) ::::From the article on AC: ``However, there are schools of mathematical thought, primarily within set theory, that either reject the axiom of choice or investigate consequences of axioms inconsistent with AC.`` While it has never been conclusively proven or disproven, in many mathematical disciplines is taken to be true. [ ] (UTC`

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

60,913,431

OK, I assumed blocked meant blocked I didn't know I could edit here. But I can't respond on WP:ANI that is where the real discussion is going on!

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

60,915,645

I've used a series of anon IPs I don't keep track of which ones they are, but (I suppose you'll just block all of these) they include 88.149.150.47, 83.211.48.173, 83.77.214.114, 84.162.18.6, 63.203.204.231, 24.57.143.66 and others. I've never used another named account.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

60,921,768

I hope you people don't mind but, in the finel episode of Sonic X Rouge states she is going to work with Sonic and the gang, and she had a necklace with a pruple heart and trimming

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

60,924,219

` My Delphi helpfile says that I must declare my routines with the ``Safecall`` convention if it is to support both compile time binding and runtime binding through COM automation. Not sure if this is used outside Delphi... `

2,006

false

article

random

train

false

60,924,245

== ARE YOU NUTS == WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU VANDALISING several articles BY REMOVING LINKS?! i mean guru and dj premier use your brain first if you got any, remove links then

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

true

60,925,293

`the ``wikipedia sucks`` url will disappear in the blink of an eye. `

2,006

false

user

blocked

dev

true

60,926,954

== fucking == faggot hopefully somone rapes or eats you soon you fucking idiot

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

true

60,927,374

== fuck you == youfuckingidiot

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

true

60,927,453

== stupid == assholes never die rightß INSTEAD; THEY BECOME WACKPEDIA ADMINS: DIE

2,006

false

user

blocked

dev

true

60,927,662

Please drop it. It's over.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

60,927,979

== you stupid whore == will never get it will you? doesnt fit in your tiny wakpedia wimp err admin brain fuck you asshole

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

true

60,928,746

== who are you == to tell me anything about personal attacks? fuck you

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

true