dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
20,866,410	` Maps of the Baltic Lands (1000-1809 AD) http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/historical/baltics.html United Scandinavia (in yellow). In 1809, the Russian Empire defeated the Kingdom of Sweden in the ``Great Northern War``, and the Finnish Provinces of Sweden where ceeded to the Russian Empire. In 1814, Sweden was awarded Norway as being apart of the United Kingdom/Kingdom of Sweden/Empire of Russia Alliance against Napolean. In 1905, the Kingdom of Norway peacefully gained its independence from Sweden, and in 1917 the Republic of Finland gained its independence from Russia via ``Victory on the Battlefield``. Today it sits as follows, (i). The Kingdom of Denmark, 1814 (Constitutional-Monarchy), (ii). The Kingdom of Norway, 1905 (Constitutional-Monarchy), (i). The Kingdom of Sweden, 1563 (post-1814, Constitutional-Monarchy), (i). The Republic of Finland, 1917 (RepublicConstitutional-Monarchy), Map of United Scandinavia (1397) http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/historical/baltics_1400.jpg`	2,005	true	user	blocked	test	false
20,866,553	`. In 1809, the Russian Empire defeated the Kingdom of Sweden in the ``Great Northern War``, and the Finnish Provinces of Sweden where ceeded to the Russian Empire. In 1814, Sweden was awarded Norway as being apart of the United Kingdom/Kingdom of Sweden/Empire of Russia Alliance against Napolean. In 1905, the Kingdom of Norway peacefully gained its independence from Sweden, and in 1917 the Republic of Finland gained its independence from Russia via ``Victory on the Battlefield``. Today it sits as follows, (i). The Kingdom of Denmark, 1814 (Constitutional-Monarchy), (ii). The Kingdom of Norway, 1905 (Constitutional-Monarchy), (i). The Kingdom of Sweden, 1563 (post-1814, Constitutional-Monarchy), (i). The Republic of Finland, 1917 (Republic),`	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
20,866,673	I am not extremely happy of creation of the separate article Mutsuhito. IMO no big need to say that a name can be a Japanese male first name. Policy that comes into mind: Wikipedia is not a dictionary. (nor an almanach). The info thus written on the page is unencyclopedic, IMO.	2,005	false	article	blocked	dev	false
20,867,423	(ii). Personal Union of England and Wales (1534-1536). In 1534, King Henry VIII, was refused a divorce from the Pope. Henry then decided to break with Rome, and found his own church. The Church of England (today know as Church of England, Anglican Churhc, Episcopalian (in the USA, and Scotland) was thus created in 1534. Since Henry was of Welsh blood, he took power over both England and Wales in Personal Union. Henry confiscated all Roman Catholic Church Lands (well 90%) in England and Wales, and transfered them to the Church of England. In 1536, the Act of Union of 1536, formal merged the Parliamentary Powers of England and Wales, whose seat of parliament is todays British House of Commons. Thus, the Personal Union lasted only two years (1534-1536), and the formal Legislative Union of England and Wales lasts to this day.	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
20,868,224	Commonwealth Realm Protected Status	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
20,868,436	` ``Justise Delayed is Justise Denyed``. The ArbCom does not even know what to rule on anymore. Until they decide what to rule on, and go ahead and do something, I am going to keep posting. At least dealing with me will prevent you from molesting gbambino's contribution, which are in my opinion, being unfair harrassed by you, with extreme prejustice. `	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	true
20,868,691	Just to let you know, I support your contributions, as being accurate, informative, and educational. I thank you for taking the time to type them. I have learned quite a bit from your writings, and I wish to congratulate you on work well done eh. :	2,005	true	article	blocked	dev	false
20,872,291	2005 (UTC) :::::Could we make out own? We wouldn't have to copy the 'wrap-around' feature. But if you could see similar articles as you type into the search box, it would show users the vast quantity of articles there are, and also cut down on the need for redirects and disambiguation pages. 19:12, 12 August	2,005	true	article	random	dev	false
20,876,050	== Inka hieroglyphics? == Umm, wasn't it that the Inkas had no forms of writing (apart from the k'ipu)	2,005	false	article	blocked	test	false
20,901,072	` I changed it, but it is kind of long. Father `	2,005	true	article	random	test	false
20,903,232	== For reactive impedances == Moving here until it's right: Jacobi obtained his theorem by logical reasoning, but the mathematical proof is as follows. In the diagram opposite, power is being transferred from the source, with voltage and fixed source impedance , to a load with resistance , resulting in an instantaneous current . is simply the source voltage divided by the total circuit resistance: : The average power dissipated in the load is the square of the current multiplied by the resistive portion of the load impedance: : We could calculate the value of Zload for which this expression is a maximum, but it is easier to calculate the value of Zload for which the denominator : is a minimum. The result will be the same in either case. Differentiating with respect to Zload: : For a maximum or minimum, the first derivative is zero, so : or : In practical resistive circuits, Zsource and Zload are both positive. To find out whether this solution is a minimum or a maximum, we must differentiate again: : This is positive for positive values of Zsource and Zload, showing that the denominator is a minimum, and the power is therefore a maximum, when Zsource = Zload*. >	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
20,910,450	` ==Help me defend Wikipedia noble principles of Consensus decisions by Principled Negotiation, not Tyranny of the Majority== is leading a cabal with and and and others to impose a Tyranny of the Majority on Truth True Epistemology and Knowledge. They make personal attacks against me. All their comments are ad hominem/poisoning the well type fallacy. They commit the fallacy of conflation of belief and knowledge, two completely different things. This is part of their Obscurantism. They refuse to include my view that the only reasonable thing that can be said about truth is that ``Snow is white`` is true is redundant in as much as it says nothing more than is said by ``Snow is white``, so truth is just something that is in accord with an actual state of affairs in the particular case. They started a Request for Arbitration against me. They started an injunction against me to unfairly prevent the minority view from being presented. They block me at the drop of a hat because I am in the minority. Please ban all of these users, so Wikipedia can return to the noble principle of consensus decisions by principled negotiation and no personal attacks. The cabal has others JimWae Byped Canderson7 Essjay Meelar Spangineer CryptoDerk Asbestos BaronLarf Veratien Ancheta Wis WhiteC Ravenswood Asbestos Christofurio Kzollman Gkhan `	2,005	false	user	blocked	train	false
20,917,397	` == Gryffindor == Regarding sudden changes where some nobility or royalty paraphernalia is added/changed into the articles, these are the trademark of user Gryffindor, nee user Antares, also formerly user Bhinneka and user At-whatever. The said person has attempted to add styles and titles to a vast number of locations, and also attempts to ``make things consistent`` in that regard. You have faced an influx of ``von`` additions to names which are perfectly capable of living without von. There are certain signs that the aforementioned user is somewhat neurotic, as she soon erases comments from others that questions her actions. `	2,005	false	user	blocked	test	false
20,928,418	== Incan writing? == Did the Incas have any writing method apart from the k'ipu? This website, http://www.anomalies-unlimited.com/Inca_Writing.html, alleges so. Do their claims have any merit?	2,005	false	article	blocked	dev	false
20,935,224	I think inconsistency is part of the price of a freely editable encyclopia. The Spanish spelling is the most common in English sources so it is the correct spelling for the English encyclopia according to the Wikipedia spelling guidelines. If it doubt do an 'English only' google search on the Spanish and Quechua spellings, then use the more common one first, and the less common one as an alternate spelling.	2,005	true	article	random	test	false
20,936,622	` == brian93828 == Since someone (probably some jew) protected the page, I have to comment here on this: ``That makes even less sense. The Gallery is far more notable than any of the other things on this list`` Really guys, why are we so naive to believe that an organization of homosexual blacks or native Americans could be more notable than one of whites? There is probably even Wikipedia policy that in all cases blacks go below whites on lists. `	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
20,937,230	== my original request for deletion == Unfortunately, I did not know that. I though that as the requested deleion had got done, the request is unnecessary and can be deleted.	2,005	false	user	blocked	dev	false
20,937,570	See the picture we have in the article, and also, I can find pictures of her wearing this chain. She wears this chain during the Order investure ceremonies.	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
20,950,381	* There needs to be proper mention that Rowland has never been arrested. Also, police reports are not required to be released if no arrest has been made.	2,005	false	article	blocked	test	false
20,954,428	My deepest regrets I PROMISE I SHAN'T VANDALISE WIKIPEDIA! i ask for forgiveness Rober Þorn	2,005	false	user	blocked	dev	false
20,955,197	== Malathion! == I beg unto thou, by the River of Babylon, that thee, by thy grace boundless, reinstitute me. ROBERT D. ÞORNSSON	2,005	false	user	blocked	test	false
20,955,411	I say unto thou, mercy !	2,005	false	user	blocked	train	false
20,955,852	I IMPLORE YOU! FORGIVENESS IS A VIRTUE -R. D. Þornsson	2,005	false	user	blocked	test	false
20,957,009	== Ancient History == The below text has nothing to do with how I am today. Please don't hold it against me, as I was younger and immature then. Thank you.	2,005	true	user	random	train	false
20,958,691	MALATHION! HEAR MY CALL FOR MERCY!	2,005	false	user	blocked	train	false
20,964,040	*There, now will you D	2,005	true	user	blocked	test	false
20,970,631	ranmaru mori son of yoshinari mori in the mino he play flute in the izomo	2,005	false	article	blocked	train	false
20,974,521	` ****I have to say, the entire Criticism section is, at the very least, quite dubious. After reading what is on this talk page, and the transparent criticism linked to in the parent page (I should mention the ``criticism`` is hardly anything but puerile ranting), it appears as if someone, perhaps a wiki administrator, dislikes Mr. Garrett and is blatently obvious in his attempts to discredit him. The dubious mark should be added back to the Criticism section until the dispute is settled.`	2,005	false	article	blocked	dev	false
20,985,012	Both the EB and MWGD definitions make clear that the name Shechem refers to the modern city call Nablus. What point do you think you have? Your protest seems illogical to me.	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
20,988,415	:Ken, Thanks for that. I hadn't seen the whole picture - I think I have already been involved on one side, so am reluctant to assist in the mediation. There are two issues that I see: #multiple copies of the same article filed under different names and spellings. These should be reduced to a single copy under an appropriate name. Having multiple copies isn't going to stop people finding and redirecting all his efforts #progress on layout and content of the single article. This will need sourcing (for the accuracy of the article) and an agreement to indulge in communal improvement. How this comes about I don't know. It may be necessary to seek some article protection from an uninvolved sysop. Good luck!	2,005	true	user	random	train	false
20,993,579	== You be a liar == I know I left a obscene comment on your talk page. You deserved it, for all of the POV pushing you do. Ruy's comment wasn't nasty, and you know it. You abuse your powers I hope you feel like a bigger person now. You push your POV, you harass other users who do not agree with it, and you regularly insult others so you can push your partisan hippy crap. Good day.	2,005	false	user	blocked	train	true
21,000,864	== Yes well == Personally, I think that Chun Li has attacks that are used but re named in other characters. Such as Ling from Tekken. But thats my view. I still think girls with that sort of Power under them have the respect. Despite being a Cartoon fighter. =====))))) Hadoken!	2,005	false	article	blocked	train	false
21,001,835	It can be substantiated. I really don't care to file an RFC. I can't wait for this latest one your buddy is talking about though. In fact, once the RFC is posted, make sure everyone in the article knows, so we can all comment. Who's the sockpuppets this time? You?	2,005	false	user	blocked	train	false
21,002,547	Personal attack #4. Thanks for the 3RR warning though, I'm not going to revert the article for the rest of today. You have a good day.	2,005	false	user	blocked	test	false
21,005,242	== Listen chump == not only have you acted in collusion with Willmcw but you have behaved badly. I would use stronger language but I don't think that it is appropriate here. I will say this, it is obvious to me and to my advocate that though you assume what Willmcw says to be true, the edits I made were in fact worthy, and not only will your reply be redirected to my advocate but also to a host of otehr administrators. This has become such a trying time that I've been granted the ability to switch to a new identity and leave your vicious attacks behind. You have proven to be a slimy loose moralled child who spends too much time at wikipedia tryong to bully others out of the edits you have only taken up since this July. Whihc translates to the fac that your 'job' at 23 leaves you such an amount of free time that you can sling insults and barbs online rather than actually do positive work at Wikipedia. Whereas my edits may not have been as substantial as your own, my sockpuppetry related to willmcw, or at least buddying upo wiht him, has not been as pervasive as your own. I'm leaving. I'm fed up with the typical acne faced loser who can't get a date with a woman or a man, and so spends his time in front of his computer screen making alliances with other awkward socially malnourished dweebs who can think of nothing better than to try an interact only thorugh the computer. You do a disservice to all computer geeks everywhere by trying to be more intelligent than others, because the lack of your vision seeps through the anger you display for all to see. Any true hacker knows that the way you have taking stands here has opened you up for retribution, as I am nnot a hacker, I won't work on such matters, in negative aspects. But you should be mindful that you've made a strong mess here, and no matter what your own opinon is, oyu should learn manners, and go out andd get a date rather than having your total amount of human interaction fed to you through wikipedia and your own websites. Loser	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	true
21,007,381	==Neutral?== Isn't this article a bit one-sided? It explains superstitious belief in ghosts, then an analysis of skepticism towards ghosts, along with scientific evidence to disprove ghosts' existance. This is fine with me, but shouldn't there be some information about scientific research in favor of ghosts' existence. I've been doing a bit of reading here and there, and the evidence does exist. I don't have enough resources or information to write it myself, however I'd appreciate it if someone could look into it.	2,005	false	article	blocked	test	false
21,012,000	` ==New Outline of British History== Recently, Dr. Goldstein said. ``One tends to think of England as Anglo-Saxon,`` ``But we show quite clearly there was not complete replacement of existing populations by either Anglo-Saxons or Danes. It looks like the Celts did hold out.`` British historians have generally emphasized the Roman and Anglo-Saxon contributions to English culture at the expense of the Celtic. A recent history of Britain, ``The Isles`` by Norman Davies, tried to redress the balance. The Celts were ignored, he noted, in part because no documentary histories remain, the Celts having regarded writing as a threat to their oral traditions. Generations of historians saw British history as beginning with Roman invasions of the first century A.D. and indeed identified with the Romans rather than the defeated Celts. ``So long as classical education and classical prejudices prevailed, educated Englishmen inevitably saw ancient Britain as an alien land,`` Dr. Davies writes. The new survey indicates that the genetic contribution of the Celts has been as much underestimated as their historical legacy. Dr. Davies said in an interview that ``traditionally, historians thought in terms of invasions: the Celts took over the islands, then the Romans, then the Anglo-Saxons.`` ``It now seems much more likely that the resident population doesn't change as much as thought,`` he continued. ``The people stay put but are reculturalized by some new dominant culture.```	2,005	false	article	random	train	false
21,013,482	` :I am glad that you agree with me that the expremie forum is ``an obscure discussion board`` and that postings (or copies of these postings) are not of enough quality (as sources) to be used as citacions to substantiate a claim, in particular in a controvesy such as this one. Anyone can say almost anything about anything on these forums, accountability is close to zero. `	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
21,032,840	Actually, it seems the only uses of overline are WP mirrors... -\ Including complex number, which uses overline to mean complex conjugate.	2,005	true	article	random	dev	false
21,037,228	`I guess these are often called ``candy rocks`` to differentiate them: http://frankysattic.home.comcast.net/rockcandy.html `	2,005	false	article	random	test	false
21,040,875	` == new text == I've added my whole talk page to your talk page, as you've been creatively editing yours, I choose to creatively edit my own. good luck!!! I think your version is great Mmmmmmbo Can you please explain your edits to Biff Rose? They appear to express a negative POV towards the person. - == For willmcw == I think its high time you stopped trying to rearrange my words. The information contained on the biff rose site colelcts the pertinent info. It is not a billboard for his achievements, but an overview of his career. I think records that were pressed and sold are of worth. Ones that were not around in copies more than fifty or a hundred are not. I've interviewed Rose, I know which ones sold and which ones didn't. You can beef up a discog with murky details, but it won't help the whole wiki crowd. Stop being bullheaded, and agressive, because though you've been given power through edits, you have also become that which you supposedly fight against. You are not allowing the newer versions of this piece to come to life, but instead are so closely guarding the information disseminated from within that you have become like a fascist. Terrible!!! :Why do you delete the number of ``Carson`` appearances? Why are you deleting the name of his biggest song? What does it matter to you if the records sold 10 or 10,000 copies? Do you have some personal animus towards Rose? Please note that your personal feelings, and your personally-obtained interviews, should not be used to influence the article. It's a biography, and should present a comprehensive picture of his life. It's not a place to gain revenge on someone you don't like. - ::I've copied this discussion to the talk:Biff Rose page. - :: Any info deleted was moved from prominence to more esoteric reading of it, to make the article read better, and have a decent flow. That Rose was in Time magazine once in 1965 is not of note. That he wrote a song that was covered by both Tiny Tim and David Bowie is. That that song was co written Oscar winning musician Paul Williams is important. Also of note, it should be mentioned that Rose has disavowed the Williams connection in several interviews, until in late 2004 on his own website's message board he admitted he was falsefying William's own involvement in the song. But a small 200 word blurb in time 50 years ago is not of worth. As for Rose's appearnaces on Carson, there has been no reall connection with the amount of times Rose officially appeared on the show, and how many times he taped performances. He alleges, himself, that he appeared on the show 12 times. Producerss from the Tonight show remember him being on with much less regularity. Therefore, a distinction, to leave out embrassment, would be something like, ``Rose appeared with some level of regularity on the tonight show in the end of the decade.`` Of note> Rose was banned from any more performances on the Tonight Show because he refused to cut to a commercial break during his last performance, reciting a poem he often claimed as his own, which in fact was a poem by Paul Newman's uncle, Joseph Newman. This was chalked up to Rose's irrascible nature. I think it is important to notice to, the anger that first rears its head here, and then seems to pop up, on the record he did in 73, and beyond, to his later self released recordings where Rose is heard calling african americans niggers, and making fun of the jewish religion, citing Hit5ler as a genius, who clearly had a vision. Willmcw is trying to keep the previous words someone else wrote about Rose being a child molester, which were clearly vandalism. I did not write that, and the anti semitic sentiments attributed to Rose are very easily found in his records and his websites. Willmcw is a vandal and works against my own edits in a nasty and un wiki fashion. ==Greetings== Greetings and welcome to wikipedia. Please excuse the rude treatment you've received from the administrator who has engaged most of your attention thus far. He has a bad habit of disregarding Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers, especially where a newcomer has made edits to an article or subject he deems to be his territory. You should not let a hostile reception deter you from participating here and I hope you will stay. While editing I encourage you to review Wikipedia's policies and guidelines located here. Please make a good faith attempt at abiding by each, and if you believe that another user you have encountered is not doing so a proper recourse is to inform him/her of it. Thanks and welcome once again. :I don't think that this is a new user. - ::A hunch that somebody's a returnee, absent clear proof, is no basis to harass him or her. Unless you have proof and are prepared to make a case of it, please assume good faith. :::I'm not harassing anyone. I came to his talk page to ask him to not delete material from an article. The fact that he is using a different username today didn't seem like sufficient reason to call out the welcome wagon. But you go right ahead if you like. Cheers, - == Revert warning == You are in danger of violating the three revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. - == REad this == Willmcw, I understadn yo uare trying to avoid vandalism, but by manipulating this site into your view you promote FASCISM. MY edits are good on the subject of Biff Rose. Look at his website, research his recordings. Time magazine has written numerous articles, are these mentioned in other wiki posts... NO. So why here? As for Rose's self released recordings, I did a favor to you by listing them. Are Other performers non accesible recordings listed? NO. Do a better job editing and less of one POlicing because you stink at it. == Redirect == The article at Biff rose is improperly-titled because it is not capitalized correctly. Please leave it as a redirect to the properly-named article. Thank you. - == What the? == Hey, why are you reverting my edits and removing the photo of Biff Rose? I found a separate article on the same topic (where you seemed to be the main author), incorporated the main points from it in an attempt to mege them. Someone later redirected it. Why are you deleting my additions? However much I abhor racism, anti-semitism, etc. I think that whatever Biff Rose currently espouses seems more like it should be taken with a grain of salt. Not quite the same as David Duke. I have no problem with these things outlined in his bio, but it should really not have the form as something showing a personal point of view. It seems like the way the article was, was fairly balanced, showing both old and new aspects of the artist. And let the quotes and links speak for themselves. Why did you remove all that other stuff which you deem extraneous, by the way? Having the name of some songs and collaborators seems rather harmless. But anyway, I don't really have any particular agenda in the matter, I just don't like random deletions of what I write. Hey man, you have got to get a more broad sided view of the reality. what your writing only proves that you are a sock puppet for the Rose crew, and that you are unable to realize that wikipedia is a group process and that your words will be eidted no matter what, it's the nature of the beast. If you don't like the process move to some other site that protects your version of relaity as the truth. Good luck finding that place, brainiac. Steve ==Username== Someone created a user page for you claiming that you were ``a vandal who had a beef with one of the real Steve Espinolas``. I've deleted it. Best wishes, It was at , with the content ``Steve Espinola`` is the name of at least four real people. The Wikipedia user calling himself ``Steve Espinola,`` however, is a vandal who has a beef with one of the real Steve Espinola's. signed, A real Steve Espinola, Brooklyn, NY.`` It was created by an anonymous user. Best wishes, :Can you verify that your name is really ``Steve Espinola``? There is a well-known singer by that name. Another user is claiming to be him and claiming that you are impersonating him. This is similar behavior to someone who used the name though he apparently was not that person. - I can verify I am Steve Espinola, can oyu verify that I'm not? Steve Espinola :There is a famous	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
21,044,481	That sort of behavior of Jtdirl, which seems to be regular, is one of the main reasons why it is entirely justified to write frankly in the relevant discussion one's objective opinion of Jtdirl's there-relevant behavior and facts supporting the opinion.	2,005	false	user	blocked	train	false
21,049,821	== Nig(g)er == Shut up, sit down.	2,005	false	user	blocked	train	true
21,049,837	== banned or significantly restricted in 46 states == I'd like to know what others think of this line from the article. The style guide Words to avoid advices to avoid representing statistics this way. I personally want to know how many states banned the practice altogether. Abortion in the United States says that 31 states allowed abortion to protect the mother's life only, 13 states had laws similar to Colorado's which was fairly liberal, and 2 more allowed abortion in limited instances. So, according to that article 46 states just restricted the practice. Where was it banned?	2,005	false	article	random	test	false
21,050,352	Very promotional, indeed. The information seems sound though. I'll merge it with Conceptual schema, keep the link to [http://www.agiledata.org/essays/dataModeling101.html] and throw away the other links.	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
21,050,703	== I didn't vandalise it you cockface! == I just told you shut up and sit down.	2,005	false	user	blocked	train	true
21,050,804	```There is a Gendarmerie, but the number of members is unknown. `` 1400 army + 400 paramilitary +200 navy +120 airforce = 2120. Total military force is 2500. 2500-2120= 380 Gendarmerie?`	2,005	false	article	blocked	train	false
21,072,014	:Oh Dear!! Does this mean we will have to remove the ref to Jacobi from this page??	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
21,072,381	That was a mistake the stupid asses at Funimation made, Bardock was never a scientist.	2,005	false	article	blocked	train	true
21,079,184	` :The reason I edited the chronology to that form is because ``Born to Make You Happy`` and ``From the Bottom of My Broken Heart`` were both released at the same time, but in different parts of the world. My edit makes more sense, whether you agree with it or not. `	2,005	true	user	random	test	false
21,082,281	, as well as write frankly one's objection to Jtdirl's action in question and facts supporting that objection	2,005	false	user	blocked	test	false
21,083,969	== Chemistry == Hi I saw your article Cyclodecapentaene you created. Quite an article, did you really write that from scratch? I'm assuming you did, but it's so full of information and intersting stuff that I'm worried it's copied from somewhere! Don't take that as an offense, it's just that we need to be careful to avoid copyright violations. This was meant more of as a congratulations than it has come out, I swear! Also you may be interested in Wikipedia:Missing science topics, particularly the chemistry one. Thanks -	2,005	true	user	random	dev	false
21,086,331	== Congratulations == Hi Chris, it's been quite a while since we last spoke, and even longer since I last visited Wikipedia. Anyway, I just wanted to check in and say hi, and congrats on your position as an Admin. How is everything going with Atter? I have long since lost the link. Please send me an email so we can get back in touch.	2,005	true	user	random	train	false
21,089,051	: Okay, while I agree with the first point, that the previous header title is more appropriate, I must say that I'm kinda alarmed by your second contention. Your POV on Timothy Leary is of course valid in your own right, but to generalize and dismiss him and his ideas from this article doesn't seem to be fair. It is not our duty to figure out what material is subjectively valid or not. I have taken both a literature class and a criminal justice class on the undergraduate level that included a subtantial section about Leary, his reasearch and ideaology; He's defintely notable. Even though I might not susbscribe to all of what he believes, I still think that it would be incomplete to write him off as a crazy just because that's how his image is perpetuated today. To make wikipedia the best resource, we may want to include Leary's conclusions, but ensure that readers can get the complete picture about him, and his work, so they can make up their mind on their own. C'est vrai, non?	2,005	true	article	random	test	false
21,095,458	`I think the name ``Mac OS`` was already applied to 7.5.1, not 7.6. However, the progress bar during startup (and with it the smiling doubleface) also came with 7.5.1, not 7.5. `	2,005	false	article	random	train	false
21,099,216	::You might as well argue that agriculture is not competitive because it is subsidized, and we should all go back to hunting and gathering! 23:17, 2005 August 15 (UTC)	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
21,108,506	* nobody likes a tattle-tail now ) Dog fighting is definitely a sport, although an ugly one. Boxing is also a sport ! Go figure. My question is why can't a link to List of dog fighting breeds under ==Also== be allowed on the same page when Category:Dog fighting breeds was used ? Cheers	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
21,108,686	== Duchess of Windsor == There seem to be things happening all the time in location of Wallis, Duchess of Windsor. And check also Talk:Wallis, Duchess of Windsor	2,005	false	user	blocked	train	false
21,109,172	- why doesn't it have a member listing...	2,005	true	article	random	dev	false
21,113,982	` :``To these authors an Islamophobic position typically encompasses the belief that Islam intrinsically promotes religious fanaticism, violent tendencies towards non-Muslims, terrorism, and that Islam is intrinsically hostile to concepts such as equality, tolerance, democracy and human rights.`` Islam does intrinsically promote religious fanaticism, does promote violence and ill-feeling towards non-Muslims, does seem to spawn many terrorists, and is intrinsically hostile to concepts such as equality, tolerance, democracy and human rights. I thought a phobia was an irrational fear of something. I admit that I do fear Islam, the belief system, but I don't consider this a phobia. It seems quite rational to me. I just don't want to see many more countries becoming anything like Iran, with sinners being put to death for commiting ``crimes`` that are merely breaches of Islam. Islam does seem to promote a desire to do away with secular democracies and impose Islam as a form of government. Muslims somehow manage to evoke more uneasiness in me even than George Bush and his loony Fundamentalist Christian friends. Religion is such a scourge on our species. Killing each other over invisible dieties who don't even exist. Dumb.`	2,005	false	article	blocked	train	false
21,122,361	` == My thoughts on the Scrabble word list == I understand the opinion of many is that I messed these lists up, but in my opinion this is not the case. Not only does the list now contain many more, genuine words than it used to, but I've incorporated the definitions, stated the irregular plurals, such as qawwal hooked by I, and so on. To me it seems the only genuine concern with the new page is capital letters. Knowledge of irregular plurals such as fuqaha is useful, as is the fact that somehow we must categorize or otherwise sort these words so that they have a genuine meaning, a genuine context, which others can believe, research or add to. I've already said to others, if they feel the words should be in lower case go ahead and do so (I was hoping I could get these words up in courier or some other consistently spaced font, but this appears to be impossible, thus meaning I would further understand the wish to make these words lower-case). And I'll consistently make my case that these words do exist, I've cited my sources, and the justification for the fact that each of these words exists. Yes, I'll admit that words like bathqol (which I'm happy writing in lower case for now), draw very few Google hits, but I was writing from an amalgamation of sources melded into an individual source, which is justification enough for me that they should be included in this list. I hope you think this is okay. I'm going to ask whether he would update his opinion as stated on the talk page. Meanwhile, I am of the opinion that, although perhaps obscure to some, the dictionaries I have cited are genuine dictionaries, with genuine words and should be treated as such. Please respond with your opinions. PS. Maybe as I have earlier in this statement, the right thing to do would be to reproduce the list in bold lower case, rather than regular upper case, so as to upset fewer people. \|Edits`	2,005	true	user	random	train	false
21,127,355	== Page move == Moved page from East Coast Radio to East Coast Radio (South Africa). Removed disambiguation link.	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
21,128,854	:Thank you. The matter has now been addressed. \|	2,005	true	article	random	test	false
21,131,660	` :I've no strong feelings either way about splitting the early history section. the geog , politics, and wildlife sections are good. wildlife should probably be renamed ``flora and fauna`` (see South Africa and Australia), shortened, and made broader in scope. the full length version of wildlife could go in a separate articles - 'fauna in the drc' and 'flora in the drc'- `	2,005	true	article	blocked	dev	false
21,141,029	` :It is unknown whether makednos is a ``Greek word``. Suggestions include maki-kedon, with kedon Macedonian for Greek khthon. But this is uncertain. The origin of the name is unknown. `	2,005	true	user	random	test	false
21,143,112	` == Save typing ``Democratic Republic of the Congo`` == Tired of typing ``the Democratic Republic of the Congo``? Me too. I've created a bunch of redirecting articles to which mean you can just type DRC instead, with or without the the, ie History of DRC, Politics of the DRC etc. As a precedent, the USA articles have a similar thing. It's almost as complicated as the China/Taiwan thing. (Taiwan can also be known as ROC, which can also be the name for Republic of Congo, which can also be the name for Congo-Kinshasa's first republic etc etc - confused?)- `	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
21,150,437	== Sockpuppet discovery == is the sockpuppeteer of banned user (and several other sockpuppets) Even though Eequor claims to be strongly anti-Christian, this is in fact a lie. Eequor has repeatedly attacked, within the rules, several editors who make negative comments against Christianity, to the extent that her status as an evangelical christian, and her editing behaviour associated with it, was a heavy part of her RFA and both claimed to be female, as does Eequor *Shortly after crossing Eequor's path negatively, editors find their pages vandalised by one of a number of sockpuppets, as well as false accusations against them by editors they have never previously met (e.g. 's accusation against after Eequor raised an extensive RFC against CheeseDreams on a topic Eequor supposedly didn't give a damn about and claims to be on CheeseDream's (anti-Christian) side over)	2,005	true	user	random	test	false
21,154,297	Should say a little about the characters.	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
21,155,438	It's not even on television yet.	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
21,156,924	that Rose effects his audience either positively or negatively	2,005	true	user	blocked	dev	false
21,157,534	LUCKY is the best YOU ADDED MORE TO RANDALL WEEMS!	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
21,157,651	You work miracles. What did you do just go to google and type in Randall Weems or type in Recess?	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
21,158,015	DISAMBIGUATION PAGE needed	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
21,158,111	categories needed. not just stub?	2,005	true	article	blocked	dev	false
21,159,434	:I put much of that information in before, sourced to a Guardian article. For whatever reason, was very eager to remove it. -	2,005	true	article	blocked	dev	false
21,170,697	Your changes to Bluelight Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.	2,005	true	user	random	train	false
21,171,362	` Well, my fear isn't particularly ``intense``, just appropriate to a practical threat. I also consider it fairly normal, and I would imagine it is quite common about the belief system discussed. I still don't see how this is a phobia.`	2,005	false	article	blocked	dev	false
21,172,942	` :Yeah it was in the Channel 4 article that Kwh removed from the article ``Surveillance officers wrongly believed he could have been Hussain Osman, one of the prime suspects, or another terrorist suspect.``. I see he removed the pic too.... - `	2,005	true	article	blocked	dev	false
21,173,984	:::Put back the photo and the link -	2,005	true	article	blocked	test	false
21,186,723	::::Leave the tags until we reach consensus on this discussion page.	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
21,190,574	You are right! That is much more balanced and, dare I say, even approaching NPOV. Thank you for restoring the link to Dr. Peter Breggin's paper. Any idea who killed it in the first place? EFS -	2,005	false	article	blocked	test	false
21,190,647	== CoS page may be needing some help over the next few days. Again? == Check out the CoS discussion page for details.	2,005	true	user	random	dev	false
21,192,476	:: As 'mod' is a short term for modification, it is a mod. Any change made to the original software or content must be considered a modification, whether it is 1 bit or 100 MB. Because it has been changed beyond the original design and construction of the game. USing a Game Shark or Action Replay is actually modifying code to make this available, thus the game you are then playing is _not_ the original game no matter how you look at it.	2,005	false	article	blocked	train	false
21,192,831	Well, IMO the article still does paint a rosier picture than the facts would indicate. And I'll try to improve it. But I think it's useful to discuss these things. As for adding the Philippines and France, I've made a start at this in another way, see the new stubs at Bataan Nuclear Power Plant and Jervis Bay Nuclear Power Plant. :I'm sorry you feel that I didn't read the article carefully enough, but frankly I don't think my comments have been read very carefully either! As to the alleged misunderstanding, can you be specific? I didn't say it was just duplicated. As to what you will and won't allow, the community will decide that, not just you. As to arbitrarily removing contents, AFAIK I never have or do, thank you very much, so I think that's a bit over the top. If I was going to stubify the article without discussion, I would have done so, and you probably would have just reverted it. Much better to discuss it, as we are doing. :Frankly, I still think that it would have been less work to abandon your split and start again. That's all I was suggesting, owing to the number of identical edits required to the duplicated text. But, if you and/or others are prepared to do the work required on the two articles, that's fine.	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
21,195,793	:There should be more info on this around. I'll go and find the original links I used, and then see if I can get more detail from somewhere.	2,005	true	article	random	dev	false
21,199,756	The section already starts off with saying that this is according to those that follow kabbalah. Additionaly the statements from the people about chabad would remain applicable even after the section is removed. Furthermore the intention isn't to comepletely remove it, rather the intention is to replace it with a sentence saying that there has been controversy regarding this subject which is elaborated at length in the Tzadik article, and as I explained on the talk page of chabad it is unfair to have just that paragraph without a full background which is able to be put in the Tzadik article but would be too long for the chabad article. \|	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
21,204,048	== Edit summary == Your edit summary at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/WikiProject Wikipedians for Decency in regards to my vote placement was uncalled for, admin. In all honesty, I kept getting locked out and I didn't know it mattered where I put my vote at. It is only my second vote on a Vfd. I'm usually too busy writing articles and fighting over NPOV at George W Bush.	2,005	true	user	random	test	false
21,209,387	` :It certainly seemed like a joke. But I have received the following note at my Talkpage ( ): ::Re. Merry England. The comment you reverted refers to an actual speech made by [[John Major], referring to a comment by George Orwell. Here are a variety of references. * Tony Parsons refers to the speech * Correspondent chastises Alan Bennett for espousing Major-like sensibilities. * Tony Banks criticises John Major, citing the speech. * Waitrose's page on cricket food and drink, citing the speech. 09:55, 17 August 2005 :Please someone work this material into a paragraph beginning with John Major's remark about ``Merry England`` and add the following references. `	2,005	true	article	random	test	false
21,211,955	Please clean up this page and add more information. please also add a photograph of cowie, and of his books. Add information concerning other places where he has been profiled.	2,005	false	article	blocked	test	false
21,212,565	== Master Obsolete? == More recently is was used as a title for boys and unmarried men, but it is now almost entirely obselete. Is this really true? All the mail I recieved as a boy was addressed to Master ..... , and I'm only 19.	2,005	false	article	blocked	dev	false
21,213,751	== jello nurple yellow is NOT a font color == *it was painful to look at something that stupid, so I changed it to font color=black, and for the record, you might want to look into Wikipedia:NPOV and this WP:Civil	2,005	false	user	blocked	train	false
21,222,148	::Well, it's been locked since June and if the vandalism persists one could always relock it. I think we should give it a try. /	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
21,222,292	Listen, if you don't want to contribute then why complain. This is an encyclopedia that everyone helps to edit.	2,005	false	article	random	dev	false
21,223,177	`re:Removing content from Wikipedia== Removing undesirable content entailing logical fallacy like ``Knowledge is belief`` from the article on epistemology in Wikipedia is not vandalism, moron, it is good editing. ==`	2,005	false	user	blocked	train	true
21,225,798	==SWNB== I removed the SBH info from the main SWNB page yesterday and made a subpage Wikipedia:Swedish Wikipedians' notice board/Biography. What about making similar subpages for geography, history and other topics and leave the main page for 1) links to the subpages, and 2) very current things.	2,005	true	user	random	train	false
21,227,043	Having two pictures seems to have helped, I previewed pages in the past with a picture at the top but could never get them to look right (so I never saved them). The changes I've made seem to fit in okay. -	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
21,227,980	== Homosexuality == Tell me, what is so special about homosexuality over zoophilia that exempts it from being identified as a paraphilia? If homosexuality is a sexual orientation, then surely all paraphilias based on the characteristics of the attractile are sexual orientations?	2,005	false	user	blocked	dev	true
21,228,866	` ==Deleting part about Genseiryu-Butokukai== Some anonymous user, uses different ip addresses to delete the whole part about Genseiryu-Butokukai all the time. We all know who this person is, but let´s just say this person belongs to GKIF and he simply does not like it that WGKF has this viewpoint about this organization. However, there is absolute NO slandering, degrading or insulting text in that part, so there is NO reason to delete this. As a matter of fact, this is a piece of story that BELONGS in the article about WGKF, since it is their viewpoint and it makes the (layman) reader understand there are in fact more Genseiryu organizations. Removing this part of text, just because it´s not the viewpoint of the reader, is therefore considered vandalism and will not be accepted! `	2,005	true	article	blocked	dev	false
21,231,773	You're not very bright, are you	2,005	false	article	blocked	train	true
21,233,338	:I like the latest revision. I think it really makes sense this way.	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false

20,866,410

` Maps of the Baltic Lands (1000-1809 AD) http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/historical/baltics.html United Scandinavia (in yellow). In 1809, the Russian Empire defeated the Kingdom of Sweden in the ``Great Northern War``, and the Finnish Provinces of Sweden where ceeded to the Russian Empire. In 1814, Sweden was awarded Norway as being apart of the United Kingdom/Kingdom of Sweden/Empire of Russia Alliance against Napolean. In 1905, the Kingdom of Norway peacefully gained its independence from Sweden, and in 1917 the Republic of Finland gained its independence from Russia via ``Victory on the Battlefield``. Today it sits as follows, (i). The Kingdom of Denmark, 1814 (Constitutional-Monarchy), (ii). The Kingdom of Norway, 1905 (Constitutional-Monarchy), (i). The Kingdom of Sweden, 1563 (post-1814, Constitutional-Monarchy), (i). The Republic of Finland, 1917 (RepublicConstitutional-Monarchy), Map of United Scandinavia (1397) http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/historical/baltics_1400.jpg`

2,005

true

user

blocked

test

false

20,866,553

`. In 1809, the Russian Empire defeated the Kingdom of Sweden in the ``Great Northern War``, and the Finnish Provinces of Sweden where ceeded to the Russian Empire. In 1814, Sweden was awarded Norway as being apart of the United Kingdom/Kingdom of Sweden/Empire of Russia Alliance against Napolean. In 1905, the Kingdom of Norway peacefully gained its independence from Sweden, and in 1917 the Republic of Finland gained its independence from Russia via ``Victory on the Battlefield``. Today it sits as follows, (i). The Kingdom of Denmark, 1814 (Constitutional-Monarchy), (ii). The Kingdom of Norway, 1905 (Constitutional-Monarchy), (i). The Kingdom of Sweden, 1563 (post-1814, Constitutional-Monarchy), (i). The Republic of Finland, 1917 (Republic),`

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

20,866,673

I am not extremely happy of creation of the separate article Mutsuhito. IMO no big need to say that a name can be a Japanese male first name. Policy that comes into mind: Wikipedia is not a dictionary. (nor an almanach). The info thus written on the page is unencyclopedic, IMO.

2,005

false

article

blocked

dev

false

20,867,423

(ii). Personal Union of England and Wales (1534-1536). In 1534, King Henry VIII, was refused a divorce from the Pope. Henry then decided to break with Rome, and found his own church. The Church of England (today know as Church of England, Anglican Churhc, Episcopalian (in the USA, and Scotland) was thus created in 1534. Since Henry was of Welsh blood, he took power over both England and Wales in Personal Union. Henry confiscated all Roman Catholic Church Lands (well 90%) in England and Wales, and transfered them to the Church of England. In 1536, the Act of Union of 1536, formal merged the Parliamentary Powers of England and Wales, whose seat of parliament is todays British House of Commons. Thus, the Personal Union lasted only two years (1534-1536), and the formal Legislative Union of England and Wales lasts to this day.

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

20,868,224

Commonwealth Realm Protected Status

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

20,868,436

` ``Justise Delayed is Justise Denyed``. The ArbCom does not even know what to rule on anymore. Until they decide what to rule on, and go ahead and do something, I am going to keep posting. At least dealing with me will prevent you from molesting gbambino's contribution, which are in my opinion, being unfair harrassed by you, with extreme prejustice. `

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

true

20,868,691

Just to let you know, I support your contributions, as being accurate, informative, and educational. I thank you for taking the time to type them. I have learned quite a bit from your writings, and I wish to congratulate you on work well done eh. :

2,005

true

article

blocked

dev

false

20,872,291

2005 (UTC) :::::Could we make out own? We wouldn't have to copy the 'wrap-around' feature. But if you could see similar articles as you type into the search box, it would show users the vast quantity of articles there are, and also cut down on the need for redirects and disambiguation pages. 19:12, 12 August

2,005

true

article

random

dev

false

20,876,050

== Inka hieroglyphics? == Umm, wasn't it that the Inkas had no forms of writing (apart from the k'ipu)

2,005

false

article

blocked

test

false

20,901,072

` I changed it, but it is kind of long. Father `

2,005

true

article

random

test

false

20,903,232

== For reactive impedances == Moving here until it's right: Jacobi obtained his theorem by logical reasoning, but the mathematical proof is as follows. In the diagram opposite, power is being transferred from the source, with voltage and fixed source impedance , to a load with resistance , resulting in an instantaneous current . is simply the source voltage divided by the total circuit resistance: : The average power dissipated in the load is the square of the current multiplied by the resistive portion of the load impedance: : We could calculate the value of Zload for which this expression is a maximum, but it is easier to calculate the value of Zload for which the denominator : is a minimum. The result will be the same in either case. Differentiating with respect to Zload: : For a maximum or minimum, the first derivative is zero, so : or : In practical resistive circuits, Zsource and Zload are both positive. To find out whether this solution is a minimum or a maximum, we must differentiate again: : This is positive for positive values of Zsource and Zload, showing that the denominator is a minimum, and the power is therefore a maximum, when Zsource = Zload*. >

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

20,910,450

` ==Help me defend Wikipedia noble principles of Consensus decisions by Principled Negotiation, not Tyranny of the Majority== is leading a cabal with and and and others to impose a Tyranny of the Majority on Truth True Epistemology and Knowledge. They make personal attacks against me. All their comments are ad hominem/poisoning the well type fallacy. They commit the fallacy of conflation of belief and knowledge, two completely different things. This is part of their Obscurantism. They refuse to include my view that the only reasonable thing that can be said about truth is that ``Snow is white`` is true is redundant in as much as it says nothing more than is said by ``Snow is white``, so truth is just something that is in accord with an actual state of affairs in the particular case. They started a Request for Arbitration against me. They started an injunction against me to unfairly prevent the minority view from being presented. They block me at the drop of a hat because I am in the minority. Please ban all of these users, so Wikipedia can return to the noble principle of consensus decisions by principled negotiation and no personal attacks. The cabal has others JimWae Byped Canderson7 Essjay Meelar Spangineer CryptoDerk Asbestos BaronLarf Veratien Ancheta Wis WhiteC Ravenswood Asbestos Christofurio Kzollman Gkhan `

2,005

false

user

blocked

train

false

20,917,397

` == Gryffindor == Regarding sudden changes where some nobility or royalty paraphernalia is added/changed into the articles, these are the trademark of user Gryffindor, nee user Antares, also formerly user Bhinneka and user At-whatever. The said person has attempted to add styles and titles to a vast number of locations, and also attempts to ``make things consistent`` in that regard. You have faced an influx of ``von`` additions to names which are perfectly capable of living without von. There are certain signs that the aforementioned user is somewhat neurotic, as she soon erases comments from others that questions her actions. `

2,005

false

user

blocked

test

false

20,928,418

== Incan writing? == Did the Incas have any writing method apart from the k'ipu? This website, http://www.anomalies-unlimited.com/Inca_Writing.html, alleges so. Do their claims have any merit?

2,005

false

article

blocked

dev

false

20,935,224

I think inconsistency is part of the price of a freely editable encyclopia. The Spanish spelling is the most common in English sources so it is the correct spelling for the English encyclopia according to the Wikipedia spelling guidelines. If it doubt do an 'English only' google search on the Spanish and Quechua spellings, then use the more common one first, and the less common one as an alternate spelling.

2,005

true

article

random

test

false

20,936,622

` == brian93828 == Since someone (probably some jew) protected the page, I have to comment here on this: ``That makes even less sense. The Gallery is far more notable than any of the other things on this list`` Really guys, why are we so naive to believe that an organization of homosexual blacks or native Americans could be more notable than one of whites? There is probably even Wikipedia policy that in all cases blacks go below whites on lists. `

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

20,937,230

== my original request for deletion == Unfortunately, I did not know that. I though that as the requested deleion had got done, the request is unnecessary and can be deleted.

2,005

false

user

blocked

dev

false

20,937,570

See the picture we have in the article, and also, I can find pictures of her wearing this chain. She wears this chain during the Order investure ceremonies.

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

20,950,381

* There needs to be proper mention that Rowland has never been arrested. Also, police reports are not required to be released if no arrest has been made.

2,005

false

article

blocked

test

false

20,954,428

My deepest regrets I PROMISE I SHAN'T VANDALISE WIKIPEDIA! i ask for forgiveness Rober Þorn

2,005

false

user

blocked

dev

false

20,955,197

== Malathion! == I beg unto thou, by the River of Babylon, that thee, by thy grace boundless, reinstitute me. ROBERT D. ÞORNSSON

2,005

false

user

blocked

test

false

20,955,411

I say unto thou, mercy !

2,005

false

user

blocked

train

false

20,955,852

I IMPLORE YOU! FORGIVENESS IS A VIRTUE -R. D. Þornsson

2,005

false

user

blocked

test

false

20,957,009

== Ancient History == The below text has nothing to do with how I am today. Please don't hold it against me, as I was younger and immature then. Thank you.

2,005

true

user

random

train

false

20,958,691

MALATHION! HEAR MY CALL FOR MERCY!

2,005

false

user

blocked

train

false

20,964,040

*There, now will you D

2,005

true

user

blocked

test

false

20,970,631

ranmaru mori son of yoshinari mori in the mino he play flute in the izomo

2,005

false

article

blocked

train

false

20,974,521

` ****I have to say, the entire Criticism section is, at the very least, quite dubious. After reading what is on this talk page, and the transparent criticism linked to in the parent page (I should mention the ``criticism`` is hardly anything but puerile ranting), it appears as if someone, perhaps a wiki administrator, dislikes Mr. Garrett and is blatently obvious in his attempts to discredit him. The dubious mark should be added back to the Criticism section until the dispute is settled.`

2,005

false

article

blocked

dev

false

20,985,012

Both the EB and MWGD definitions make clear that the name Shechem refers to the modern city call Nablus. What point do you think you have? Your protest seems illogical to me.

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

20,988,415

:Ken, Thanks for that. I hadn't seen the whole picture - I think I have already been involved on one side, so am reluctant to assist in the mediation. There are two issues that I see: #multiple copies of the same article filed under different names and spellings. These should be reduced to a single copy under an appropriate name. Having multiple copies isn't going to stop people finding and redirecting all his efforts #progress on layout and content of the single article. This will need sourcing (for the accuracy of the article) and an agreement to indulge in communal improvement. How this comes about I don't know. It may be necessary to seek some article protection from an uninvolved sysop. Good luck!

2,005

true

user

random

train

false

20,993,579

== You be a liar == I know I left a obscene comment on your talk page. You deserved it, for all of the POV pushing you do. Ruy's comment wasn't nasty, and you know it. You abuse your powers I hope you feel like a bigger person now. You push your POV, you harass other users who do not agree with it, and you regularly insult others so you can push your partisan hippy crap. Good day.

2,005

false

user

blocked

train

true

21,000,864

== Yes well == Personally, I think that Chun Li has attacks that are used but re named in other characters. Such as Ling from Tekken. But thats my view. I still think girls with that sort of Power under them have the respect. Despite being a Cartoon fighter. =====))))) Hadoken!

2,005

false

article

blocked

train

false

21,001,835

It can be substantiated. I really don't care to file an RFC. I can't wait for this latest one your buddy is talking about though. In fact, once the RFC is posted, make sure everyone in the article knows, so we can all comment. Who's the sockpuppets this time? You?

2,005

false

user

blocked

train

false

21,002,547

Personal attack #4. Thanks for the 3RR warning though, I'm not going to revert the article for the rest of today. You have a good day.

2,005

false

user

blocked

test

false

21,005,242

== Listen chump == not only have you acted in collusion with Willmcw but you have behaved badly. I would use stronger language but I don't think that it is appropriate here. I will say this, it is obvious to me and to my advocate that though you assume what Willmcw says to be true, the edits I made were in fact worthy, and not only will your reply be redirected to my advocate but also to a host of otehr administrators. This has become such a trying time that I've been granted the ability to switch to a new identity and leave your vicious attacks behind. You have proven to be a slimy loose moralled child who spends too much time at wikipedia tryong to bully others out of the edits you have only taken up since this July. Whihc translates to the fac that your 'job' at 23 leaves you such an amount of free time that you can sling insults and barbs online rather than actually do positive work at Wikipedia. Whereas my edits may not have been as substantial as your own, my sockpuppetry related to willmcw, or at least buddying upo wiht him, has not been as pervasive as your own. I'm leaving. I'm fed up with the typical acne faced loser who can't get a date with a woman or a man, and so spends his time in front of his computer screen making alliances with other awkward socially malnourished dweebs who can think of nothing better than to try an interact only thorugh the computer. You do a disservice to all computer geeks everywhere by trying to be more intelligent than others, because the lack of your vision seeps through the anger you display for all to see. Any true hacker knows that the way you have taking stands here has opened you up for retribution, as I am nnot a hacker, I won't work on such matters, in negative aspects. But you should be mindful that you've made a strong mess here, and no matter what your own opinon is, oyu should learn manners, and go out andd get a date rather than having your total amount of human interaction fed to you through wikipedia and your own websites. Loser

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

true

21,007,381

==Neutral?== Isn't this article a bit one-sided? It explains superstitious belief in ghosts, then an analysis of skepticism towards ghosts, along with scientific evidence to disprove ghosts' existance. This is fine with me, but shouldn't there be some information about scientific research in favor of ghosts' existence. I've been doing a bit of reading here and there, and the evidence does exist. I don't have enough resources or information to write it myself, however I'd appreciate it if someone could look into it.

2,005

false

article

blocked

test

false

21,012,000

` ==New Outline of British History== Recently, Dr. Goldstein said. ``One tends to think of England as Anglo-Saxon,`` ``But we show quite clearly there was not complete replacement of existing populations by either Anglo-Saxons or Danes. It looks like the Celts did hold out.`` British historians have generally emphasized the Roman and Anglo-Saxon contributions to English culture at the expense of the Celtic. A recent history of Britain, ``The Isles`` by Norman Davies, tried to redress the balance. The Celts were ignored, he noted, in part because no documentary histories remain, the Celts having regarded writing as a threat to their oral traditions. Generations of historians saw British history as beginning with Roman invasions of the first century A.D. and indeed identified with the Romans rather than the defeated Celts. ``So long as classical education and classical prejudices prevailed, educated Englishmen inevitably saw ancient Britain as an alien land,`` Dr. Davies writes. The new survey indicates that the genetic contribution of the Celts has been as much underestimated as their historical legacy. Dr. Davies said in an interview that ``traditionally, historians thought in terms of invasions: the Celts took over the islands, then the Romans, then the Anglo-Saxons.`` ``It now seems much more likely that the resident population doesn't change as much as thought,`` he continued. ``The people stay put but are reculturalized by some new dominant culture.```

2,005

false

article

random

train

false

21,013,482

` :I am glad that you agree with me that the expremie forum is ``an obscure discussion board`` and that postings (or copies of these postings) are not of enough quality (as sources) to be used as citacions to substantiate a claim, in particular in a controvesy such as this one. Anyone can say almost anything about anything on these forums, accountability is close to zero. `

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

21,032,840

Actually, it seems the only uses of overline are WP mirrors... -\ Including complex number, which uses overline to mean complex conjugate.

2,005

true

article

random

dev

false

21,037,228

`I guess these are often called ``candy rocks`` to differentiate them: http://frankysattic.home.comcast.net/rockcandy.html `

2,005

false

article

random

test

false

21,040,875

` == new text == I've added my whole talk page to your talk page, as you've been creatively editing yours, I choose to creatively edit my own. good luck!!! I think your version is great Mmmmmmbo Can you please explain your edits to Biff Rose? They appear to express a negative POV towards the person. - == For willmcw == I think its high time you stopped trying to rearrange my words. The information contained on the biff rose site colelcts the pertinent info. It is not a billboard for his achievements, but an overview of his career. I think records that were pressed and sold are of worth. Ones that were not around in copies more than fifty or a hundred are not. I've interviewed Rose, I know which ones sold and which ones didn't. You can beef up a discog with murky details, but it won't help the whole wiki crowd. Stop being bullheaded, and agressive, because though you've been given power through edits, you have also become that which you supposedly fight against. You are not allowing the newer versions of this piece to come to life, but instead are so closely guarding the information disseminated from within that you have become like a fascist. Terrible!!! :Why do you delete the number of ``Carson`` appearances? Why are you deleting the name of his biggest song? What does it matter to you if the records sold 10 or 10,000 copies? Do you have some personal animus towards Rose? Please note that your personal feelings, and your personally-obtained interviews, should not be used to influence the article. It's a biography, and should present a comprehensive picture of his life. It's not a place to gain revenge on someone you don't like. - ::I've copied this discussion to the talk:Biff Rose page. - :: Any info deleted was moved from prominence to more esoteric reading of it, to make the article read better, and have a decent flow. That Rose was in Time magazine once in 1965 is not of note. That he wrote a song that was covered by both Tiny Tim and David Bowie is. That that song was co written Oscar winning musician Paul Williams is important. Also of note, it should be mentioned that Rose has disavowed the Williams connection in several interviews, until in late 2004 on his own website's message board he admitted he was falsefying William's own involvement in the song. But a small 200 word blurb in time 50 years ago is not of worth. As for Rose's appearnaces on Carson, there has been no reall connection with the amount of times Rose officially appeared on the show, and how many times he taped performances. He alleges, himself, that he appeared on the show 12 times. Producerss from the Tonight show remember him being on with much less regularity. Therefore, a distinction, to leave out embrassment, would be something like, ``Rose appeared with some level of regularity on the tonight show in the end of the decade.`` Of note> Rose was banned from any more performances on the Tonight Show because he refused to cut to a commercial break during his last performance, reciting a poem he often claimed as his own, which in fact was a poem by Paul Newman's uncle, Joseph Newman. This was chalked up to Rose's irrascible nature. I think it is important to notice to, the anger that first rears its head here, and then seems to pop up, on the record he did in 73, and beyond, to his later self released recordings where Rose is heard calling african americans niggers, and making fun of the jewish religion, citing Hit5ler as a genius, who clearly had a vision. Willmcw is trying to keep the previous words someone else wrote about Rose being a child molester, which were clearly vandalism. I did not write that, and the anti semitic sentiments attributed to Rose are very easily found in his records and his websites. Willmcw is a vandal and works against my own edits in a nasty and un wiki fashion. ==Greetings== Greetings and welcome to wikipedia. Please excuse the rude treatment you've received from the administrator who has engaged most of your attention thus far. He has a bad habit of disregarding Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers, especially where a newcomer has made edits to an article or subject he deems to be his territory. You should not let a hostile reception deter you from participating here and I hope you will stay. While editing I encourage you to review Wikipedia's policies and guidelines located here. Please make a good faith attempt at abiding by each, and if you believe that another user you have encountered is not doing so a proper recourse is to inform him/her of it. Thanks and welcome once again. :I don't think that this is a new user. - ::A hunch that somebody's a returnee, absent clear proof, is no basis to harass him or her. Unless you have proof and are prepared to make a case of it, please assume good faith. :::I'm not harassing anyone. I came to his talk page to ask him to not delete material from an article. The fact that he is using a different username today didn't seem like sufficient reason to call out the welcome wagon. But you go right ahead if you like. Cheers, - == Revert warning == You are in danger of violating the three revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. - == REad this == Willmcw, I understadn yo uare trying to avoid vandalism, but by manipulating this site into your view you promote FASCISM. MY edits are good on the subject of Biff Rose. Look at his website, research his recordings. Time magazine has written numerous articles, are these mentioned in other wiki posts... NO. So why here? As for Rose's self released recordings, I did a favor to you by listing them. Are Other performers non accesible recordings listed? NO. Do a better job editing and less of one POlicing because you stink at it. == Redirect == The article at Biff rose is improperly-titled because it is not capitalized correctly. Please leave it as a redirect to the properly-named article. Thank you. - == What the? == Hey, why are you reverting my edits and removing the photo of Biff Rose? I found a separate article on the same topic (where you seemed to be the main author), incorporated the main points from it in an attempt to mege them. Someone later redirected it. Why are you deleting my additions? However much I abhor racism, anti-semitism, etc. I think that whatever Biff Rose currently espouses seems more like it should be taken with a grain of salt. Not quite the same as David Duke. I have no problem with these things outlined in his bio, but it should really not have the form as something showing a personal point of view. It seems like the way the article was, was fairly balanced, showing both old and new aspects of the artist. And let the quotes and links speak for themselves. Why did you remove all that other stuff which you deem extraneous, by the way? Having the name of some songs and collaborators seems rather harmless. But anyway, I don't really have any particular agenda in the matter, I just don't like random deletions of what I write. Hey man, you have got to get a more broad sided view of the reality. what your writing only proves that you are a sock puppet for the Rose crew, and that you are unable to realize that wikipedia is a group process and that your words will be eidted no matter what, it's the nature of the beast. If you don't like the process move to some other site that protects your version of relaity as the truth. Good luck finding that place, brainiac. Steve ==Username== Someone created a user page for you claiming that you were ``a vandal who had a beef with one of the real Steve Espinolas``. I've deleted it. Best wishes, It was at , with the content ``Steve Espinola`` is the name of at least four real people. The Wikipedia user calling himself ``Steve Espinola,`` however, is a vandal who has a beef with one of the real Steve Espinola's. signed, A real Steve Espinola, Brooklyn, NY.`` It was created by an anonymous user. Best wishes, :Can you verify that your name is really ``Steve Espinola``? There is a well-known singer by that name. Another user is claiming to be him and claiming that you are impersonating him. This is similar behavior to someone who used the name though he apparently was not that person. - I can verify I am Steve Espinola, can oyu verify that I'm not? Steve Espinola :There is a famous

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

21,044,481

That sort of behavior of Jtdirl, which seems to be regular, is one of the main reasons why it is entirely justified to write frankly in the relevant discussion one's objective opinion of Jtdirl's there-relevant behavior and facts supporting the opinion.

2,005

false

user

blocked

train

false

21,049,821

== Nig(g)er == Shut up, sit down.

2,005

false

user

blocked

train

true

21,049,837

== banned or significantly restricted in 46 states == I'd like to know what others think of this line from the article. The style guide Words to avoid advices to avoid representing statistics this way. I personally want to know how many states banned the practice altogether. Abortion in the United States says that 31 states allowed abortion to protect the mother's life only, 13 states had laws similar to Colorado's which was fairly liberal, and 2 more allowed abortion in limited instances. So, according to that article 46 states just restricted the practice. Where was it banned?

2,005

false

article

random

test

false

21,050,352

Very promotional, indeed. The information seems sound though. I'll merge it with Conceptual schema, keep the link to [http://www.agiledata.org/essays/dataModeling101.html] and throw away the other links.

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

21,050,703

== I didn't vandalise it you cockface! == I just told you shut up and sit down.

2,005

false

user

blocked

train

true

21,050,804

```There is a Gendarmerie, but the number of members is unknown. `` 1400 army + 400 paramilitary +200 navy +120 airforce = 2120. Total military force is 2500. 2500-2120= 380 Gendarmerie?`

2,005

false

article

blocked

train

false

21,072,014

:Oh Dear!! Does this mean we will have to remove the ref to Jacobi from this page??

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

21,072,381

That was a mistake the stupid asses at Funimation made, Bardock was never a scientist.

2,005

false

article

blocked

train

true

21,079,184

` :The reason I edited the chronology to that form is because ``Born to Make You Happy`` and ``From the Bottom of My Broken Heart`` were both released at the same time, but in different parts of the world. My edit makes more sense, whether you agree with it or not. `

2,005

true

user

random

test

false

21,082,281

, as well as write frankly one's objection to Jtdirl's action in question and facts supporting that objection

2,005

false

user

blocked

test

false

21,083,969

== Chemistry == Hi I saw your article Cyclodecapentaene you created. Quite an article, did you really write that from scratch? I'm assuming you did, but it's so full of information and intersting stuff that I'm worried it's copied from somewhere! Don't take that as an offense, it's just that we need to be careful to avoid copyright violations. This was meant more of as a congratulations than it has come out, I swear! Also you may be interested in Wikipedia:Missing science topics, particularly the chemistry one. Thanks -

2,005

true

user

random

dev

false

21,086,331

== Congratulations == Hi Chris, it's been quite a while since we last spoke, and even longer since I last visited Wikipedia. Anyway, I just wanted to check in and say hi, and congrats on your position as an Admin. How is everything going with Atter? I have long since lost the link. Please send me an email so we can get back in touch.

2,005

true

user

random

train

false

21,089,051

: Okay, while I agree with the first point, that the previous header title is more appropriate, I must say that I'm kinda alarmed by your second contention. Your POV on Timothy Leary is of course valid in your own right, but to generalize and dismiss him and his ideas from this article doesn't seem to be fair. It is not our duty to figure out what material is subjectively valid or not. I have taken both a literature class and a criminal justice class on the undergraduate level that included a subtantial section about Leary, his reasearch and ideaology; He's defintely notable. Even though I might not susbscribe to all of what he believes, I still think that it would be incomplete to write him off as a crazy just because that's how his image is perpetuated today. To make wikipedia the best resource, we may want to include Leary's conclusions, but ensure that readers can get the complete picture about him, and his work, so they can make up their mind on their own. C'est vrai, non?

2,005

true

article

random

test

false

21,095,458

`I think the name ``Mac OS`` was already applied to 7.5.1, not 7.6. However, the progress bar during startup (and with it the smiling doubleface) also came with 7.5.1, not 7.5. `

2,005

false

article

random

train

false

21,099,216

::You might as well argue that agriculture is not competitive because it is subsidized, and we should all go back to hunting and gathering! 23:17, 2005 August 15 (UTC)

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

21,108,506

* nobody likes a tattle-tail now ) Dog fighting is definitely a sport, although an ugly one. Boxing is also a sport ! Go figure. My question is why can't a link to List of dog fighting breeds under ==Also== be allowed on the same page when Category:Dog fighting breeds was used ? Cheers

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

21,108,686

== Duchess of Windsor == There seem to be things happening all the time in location of Wallis, Duchess of Windsor. And check also Talk:Wallis, Duchess of Windsor

2,005

false

user

blocked

train

false

21,109,172

- why doesn't it have a member listing...

2,005

true

article

random

dev

false

21,113,982

` :``To these authors an Islamophobic position typically encompasses the belief that Islam intrinsically promotes religious fanaticism, violent tendencies towards non-Muslims, terrorism, and that Islam is intrinsically hostile to concepts such as equality, tolerance, democracy and human rights.`` Islam does intrinsically promote religious fanaticism, does promote violence and ill-feeling towards non-Muslims, does seem to spawn many terrorists, and is intrinsically hostile to concepts such as equality, tolerance, democracy and human rights. I thought a phobia was an irrational fear of something. I admit that I do fear Islam, the belief system, but I don't consider this a phobia. It seems quite rational to me. I just don't want to see many more countries becoming anything like Iran, with sinners being put to death for commiting ``crimes`` that are merely breaches of Islam. Islam does seem to promote a desire to do away with secular democracies and impose Islam as a form of government. Muslims somehow manage to evoke more uneasiness in me even than George Bush and his loony Fundamentalist Christian friends. Religion is such a scourge on our species. Killing each other over invisible dieties who don't even exist. Dumb.`

2,005

false

article

blocked

train

false

21,122,361

` == My thoughts on the Scrabble word list == I understand the opinion of many is that I messed these lists up, but in my opinion this is not the case. Not only does the list now contain many more, genuine words than it used to, but I've incorporated the definitions, stated the irregular plurals, such as qawwal hooked by I, and so on. To me it seems the only genuine concern with the new page is capital letters. Knowledge of irregular plurals such as fuqaha is useful, as is the fact that somehow we must categorize or otherwise sort these words so that they have a genuine meaning, a genuine context, which others can believe, research or add to. I've already said to others, if they feel the words should be in lower case go ahead and do so (I was hoping I could get these words up in courier or some other consistently spaced font, but this appears to be impossible, thus meaning I would further understand the wish to make these words lower-case). And I'll consistently make my case that these words do exist, I've cited my sources, and the justification for the fact that each of these words exists. Yes, I'll admit that words like bathqol (which I'm happy writing in lower case for now), draw very few Google hits, but I was writing from an amalgamation of sources melded into an individual source, which is justification enough for me that they should be included in this list. I hope you think this is okay. I'm going to ask whether he would update his opinion as stated on the talk page. Meanwhile, I am of the opinion that, although perhaps obscure to some, the dictionaries I have cited are genuine dictionaries, with genuine words and should be treated as such. Please respond with your opinions. PS. Maybe as I have earlier in this statement, the right thing to do would be to reproduce the list in bold lower case, rather than regular upper case, so as to upset fewer people. |Edits`

2,005

true

user

random

train

false

21,127,355

== Page move == Moved page from East Coast Radio to East Coast Radio (South Africa). Removed disambiguation link.

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

21,128,854

:Thank you. The matter has now been addressed. |

2,005

true

article

random

test

false

21,131,660

` :I've no strong feelings either way about splitting the early history section. the geog , politics, and wildlife sections are good. wildlife should probably be renamed ``flora and fauna`` (see South Africa and Australia), shortened, and made broader in scope. the full length version of wildlife could go in a separate articles - 'fauna in the drc' and 'flora in the drc'- `

2,005

true

article

blocked

dev

false

21,141,029

` :It is unknown whether makednos is a ``Greek word``. Suggestions include maki-kedon, with kedon Macedonian for Greek khthon. But this is uncertain. The origin of the name is unknown. `

2,005

true

user

random

test

false

21,143,112

` == Save typing ``Democratic Republic of the Congo`` == Tired of typing ``the Democratic Republic of the Congo``? Me too. I've created a bunch of redirecting articles to which mean you can just type DRC instead, with or without the the, ie History of DRC, Politics of the DRC etc. As a precedent, the USA articles have a similar thing. It's almost as complicated as the China/Taiwan thing. (Taiwan can also be known as ROC, which can also be the name for Republic of Congo, which can also be the name for Congo-Kinshasa's first republic etc etc - confused?)- `

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

21,150,437

== Sockpuppet discovery == is the sockpuppeteer of banned user (and several other sockpuppets) *Even though Eequor claims to be strongly anti-Christian, this is in fact a lie. Eequor has repeatedly attacked, within the rules, several editors who make negative comments against Christianity, to the extent that her status as an evangelical christian, and her editing behaviour associated with it, was a heavy part of her RFA * and both claimed to be female, as does Eequor *Shortly after crossing Eequor's path negatively, editors find their pages vandalised by one of a number of sockpuppets, as well as false accusations against them by editors they have never previously met (e.g. 's accusation against after Eequor raised an extensive RFC against CheeseDreams on a topic Eequor supposedly didn't give a damn about and claims to be on CheeseDream's (anti-Christian) side over)

2,005

true

user

random

test

false

21,154,297

Should say a little about the characters.

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

21,155,438

It's not even on television yet.

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

21,156,924

that Rose effects his audience either positively or negatively

2,005

true

user

blocked

dev

false

21,157,534

LUCKY is the best YOU ADDED MORE TO RANDALL WEEMS!

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

21,157,651

You work miracles. What did you do just go to google and type in Randall Weems or type in Recess?

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

21,158,015

DISAMBIGUATION PAGE needed

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

21,158,111

categories needed. not just stub?

2,005

true

article

blocked

dev

false

21,159,434

:I put much of that information in before, sourced to a Guardian article. For whatever reason, was very eager to remove it. -

2,005

true

article

blocked

dev

false

21,170,697

Your changes to Bluelight Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.

2,005

true

user

random

train

false

21,171,362

` Well, my fear isn't particularly ``intense``, just appropriate to a practical threat. I also consider it fairly normal, and I would imagine it is quite common about the belief system discussed. I still don't see how this is a phobia.`

2,005

false

article

blocked

dev

false

21,172,942

` :Yeah it was in the Channel 4 article that Kwh removed from the article ``Surveillance officers wrongly believed he could have been Hussain Osman, one of the prime suspects, or another terrorist suspect.``. I see he removed the pic too.... - `

2,005

true

article

blocked

dev

false

21,173,984

:::Put back the photo and the link -

2,005

true

article

blocked

test

false

21,186,723

::::Leave the tags until we reach consensus on this discussion page.

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

21,190,574

You are right! That is much more balanced and, dare I say, even approaching NPOV. Thank you for restoring the link to Dr. Peter Breggin's paper. Any idea who killed it in the first place? EFS -

2,005

false

article

blocked

test

false

21,190,647

== CoS page may be needing some help over the next few days. Again? == Check out the CoS discussion page for details.

2,005

true

user

random

dev

false

21,192,476

:: As 'mod' is a short term for modification, it is a mod. Any change made to the original software or content must be considered a modification, whether it is 1 bit or 100 MB. Because it has been changed beyond the original design and construction of the game. USing a Game Shark or Action Replay is actually modifying code to make this available, thus the game you are then playing is _not_ the original game no matter how you look at it.

2,005

false

article

blocked

train

false

21,192,831

Well, IMO the article still does paint a rosier picture than the facts would indicate. And I'll try to improve it. But I think it's useful to discuss these things. As for adding the Philippines and France, I've made a start at this in another way, see the new stubs at Bataan Nuclear Power Plant and Jervis Bay Nuclear Power Plant. :I'm sorry you feel that I didn't read the article carefully enough, but frankly I don't think my comments have been read very carefully either! As to the alleged misunderstanding, can you be specific? I didn't say it was just duplicated. As to what you will and won't allow, the community will decide that, not just you. As to arbitrarily removing contents, AFAIK I never have or do, thank you very much, so I think that's a bit over the top. If I was going to stubify the article without discussion, I would have done so, and you probably would have just reverted it. Much better to discuss it, as we are doing. :Frankly, I still think that it would have been less work to abandon your split and start again. That's all I was suggesting, owing to the number of identical edits required to the duplicated text. But, if you and/or others are prepared to do the work required on the two articles, that's fine.

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

21,195,793

:There should be more info on this around. I'll go and find the original links I used, and then see if I can get more detail from somewhere.

2,005

true

article

random

dev

false

21,199,756

The section already starts off with saying that this is according to those that follow kabbalah. Additionaly the statements from the people about chabad would remain applicable even after the section is removed. Furthermore the intention isn't to comepletely remove it, rather the intention is to replace it with a sentence saying that there has been controversy regarding this subject which is elaborated at length in the Tzadik article, and as I explained on the talk page of chabad it is unfair to have just that paragraph without a full background which is able to be put in the Tzadik article but would be too long for the chabad article. |

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

21,204,048

== Edit summary == Your edit summary at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/WikiProject Wikipedians for Decency in regards to my vote placement was uncalled for, admin. In all honesty, I kept getting locked out and I didn't know it mattered where I put my vote at. It is only my second vote on a Vfd. I'm usually too busy writing articles and fighting over NPOV at George W Bush.

2,005

true

user

random

test

false

21,209,387

` :It certainly seemed like a joke. But I have received the following note at my Talkpage ( ): ::Re. Merry England. The comment you reverted refers to an actual speech made by [[John Major], referring to a comment by George Orwell. Here are a variety of references. * Tony Parsons refers to the speech * Correspondent chastises Alan Bennett for espousing Major-like sensibilities. * Tony Banks criticises John Major, citing the speech. * Waitrose's page on cricket food and drink, citing the speech. 09:55, 17 August 2005 :Please someone work this material into a paragraph beginning with John Major's remark about ``Merry England`` and add the following references. `

2,005

true

article

random

test

false

21,211,955

Please clean up this page and add more information. please also add a photograph of cowie, and of his books. Add information concerning other places where he has been profiled.

2,005

false

article

blocked

test

false

21,212,565

== Master Obsolete? == More recently is was used as a title for boys and unmarried men, but it is now almost entirely obselete. Is this really true? All the mail I recieved as a boy was addressed to Master ..... , and I'm only 19.

2,005

false

article

blocked

dev

false

21,213,751

== jello nurple yellow is NOT a font color == *it was painful to look at something that stupid, so I changed it to font color=black, and for the record, you might want to look into Wikipedia:NPOV and this WP:Civil

2,005

false

user

blocked

train

false

21,222,148

::Well, it's been locked since June and if the vandalism persists one could always relock it. I think we should give it a try. /

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

21,222,292

Listen, if you don't want to contribute then why complain. This is an encyclopedia that everyone helps to edit.

2,005

false

article

random

dev

false

21,223,177

`re:Removing content from Wikipedia== Removing undesirable content entailing logical fallacy like ``Knowledge is belief`` from the article on epistemology in Wikipedia is not vandalism, moron, it is good editing. ==`

2,005

false

user

blocked

train

true

21,225,798

==SWNB== I removed the SBH info from the main SWNB page yesterday and made a subpage Wikipedia:Swedish Wikipedians' notice board/Biography. What about making similar subpages for geography, history and other topics and leave the main page for 1) links to the subpages, and 2) very current things.

2,005

true

user

random

train

false

21,227,043

Having two pictures seems to have helped, I previewed pages in the past with a picture at the top but could never get them to look right (so I never saved them). The changes I've made seem to fit in okay. -

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

21,227,980

== Homosexuality == Tell me, what is so special about homosexuality over zoophilia that exempts it from being identified as a paraphilia? If homosexuality is a sexual orientation, then surely all paraphilias based on the characteristics of the attractile are sexual orientations?

2,005

false

user

blocked

dev

true

21,228,866

` ==Deleting part about Genseiryu-Butokukai== Some anonymous user, uses different ip addresses to delete the whole part about Genseiryu-Butokukai all the time. We all know who this person is, but let´s just say this person belongs to GKIF and he simply does not like it that WGKF has this viewpoint about this organization. However, there is absolute NO slandering, degrading or insulting text in that part, so there is NO reason to delete this. As a matter of fact, this is a piece of story that BELONGS in the article about WGKF, since it is their viewpoint and it makes the (layman) reader understand there are in fact more Genseiryu organizations. Removing this part of text, just because it´s not the viewpoint of the reader, is therefore considered vandalism and will not be accepted! `

2,005

true

article

blocked

dev

false

21,231,773

You're not very bright, are you

2,005

false

article

blocked

train

true

21,233,338

:I like the latest revision. I think it really makes sense this way.

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false