dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
21,240,062	Coming out of the closet are we...Your pic gives off a definite gay-vibe	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	true
21,242,258	== Quoting Uncle Joey == A: There's always a 'chance'. Don't quote me on this, but it would be difficult to try and re-negotiate with the producers, actors and the studio. So I feel strongly that it would never happen. Way to quote him there, faggots. What do you think don't quote me means?	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
21,248,003	I consider Ann Coulter a right-wing nut. I may, in fact, be Coulterophobic. )	2,005	false	article	blocked	train	false
21,248,704	` :Actually, the M6 was planned first - it was to be a ``guinea pig`` road, which spawned the M1 later. The M6 at Preston originally opened as dual 2 lane, with soft shoulders, which, apart from an extra lane each way, was exactly how the M1 was constructed. The media aren't a reliable source with roads history. Archive material from planning offices, however, is. For what it's worth - construction of the M62 began first, with the embankments for the Barton Bridge being placed in anticipation for the eventual Stratford-Eccles Bypass. `	2,005	false	article	random	test	false
21,249,555	::::SHE IS NOT FULLY CLOTHED. She clearly has on an immodest bikini top that shows off her breasts in their practical entirety. With breasts that large she should cover up quite a bit so as not to titillate or offend, a good appropriate modest dress would be some heavy sweaters or jackets that covered her obscene figure. -	2,005	true	article	blocked	dev	false
21,262,577	` ::I listed that Weinstein and Vasilliev book in VENONA or elsewhere as a reference though I don't believe it was cited. However, there was a dispute between the two mostly over the characterization of material related to Hiss which is a single point always played upon by the anti-revisionists (to label them respectfully), similar to how it is always heard that two editors of The Black Book of Communism dissociated themselves from a few remarks in the intro. Nothing substantive but broad smears. ::Incidentally I have the ``Battleground: Berlin`` book but haven't looked through it much. `	2,005	true	user	random	dev	false
21,270,323	August 2005 (UTC) Fuck you guys. I had to look up what you mean by sockpuppet, and I assure you I have never met those two awesome dudes in my life. Maybe you need to accept that more and more people know Aquman is an cocksucker. By the way, I don't shove my fist up anyone's ass but my girlfriend's. Thank you very much. 05:40, 18	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	true
21,271,322	Stripper Wonder Woman dresses like a stripper. The cleavage and the high heeled boots and the whip. C'mon. This needs to be addressed in the article.	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
21,271,625	Oh, but you're happy to do so when it's in defense of your boyfriend Aquaman.	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
21,273,330	==Homo not homo== As you invited criticism, all generic names must be capitalised even when abbreviated. Thus its 'Homo' not 'homo'if you dont know the difference 'you should get out more' You imply that the course of evolution has led to continually greater brain sizes. This is not true. Eric A. Warbuton	2,005	true	user	random	test	false
21,274,766	` == Ejectives == Were there ejectives in PIE? Read the following quotation: ``The central tenet of the Glottalic Theory of the Proto-Indo-European obstruent system is that what has been traditionally reconstructed as a plain voiced stop series can be more convincingly reconstructed as a series of ejectives, which are inherently voiceless. However, the abundant evidence that this series was voiced has led to outright rejection by many of the Glottalic Theory. In an apparent attempt to obviate these objections, Frederick Kortlandt claims to have found ample comparative evidence that this series underwent a change from ejectives to implosives to voiced stops in several branches of Indo-European. In this address evidence will be presented to demonstrate that Kortlandt's implosive model is fraught with implausibility and inconsistencies and should also be rejected.`` (Simpson Humanities Center) So, the evidence that Germanic (aspirated or not) p t k, as well as Armenian non-aspirated p t k stand for original voiced stops is abundant. Charles Barrack demonstrated that even Kortland's attempt (ejective t’ > implosive d’ > Germanic *t(h) = Indian d) causes objections. `	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
21,276,240	` ==Trichophilia== ``Harry Benjamin was also a hair fetishist`` - posted by 71.34.2.142. Any evidence to support this? - `	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
21,277,469	That is a disgusting statement.	2,005	false	article	blocked	train	false
21,277,562	website :-:: Thai bangkaew dog http://www.chumsang.net/index2.php Thai Bangkaew dogs. one of Thailand 's most famous Breeds. They love bathing and Swimming Skills. http://www.chumsang.net/Eg/BannerEg_Thai-Bangkaew_dog.gif http://www.chumsang.net/newspic/BK/TS2.JPG http://www.chumsang.net/Eg/PT02.JPG	2,005	true	user	random	train	false
21,281,928	== What did I do? == I've just got a message from Gamaliel, telling me that I have vandalised Wikipedia, and I will be banned pernamently if I do it again! There has been some kind of mistake! I think the problem is that I (and the vandaliser) are both going through Internode, my ISP. Please, I read the wiki all the time, but have never changed anything before! Please, fix this mistake!	2,005	false	user	blocked	train	false
21,283,579	` What do you mean ``... as many as 79 verses...`` can't you count you lazy git? `	2,005	false	article	blocked	dev	true
21,283,671	==Jive.exe== I've already done so. Both and I thought it was just fine for a stub. In its short life it has been speedied several times, recreated from scratch once by the longsuffering author, and restored from archive twice by me. If you look at the current version you'll see that it was very easy to expand to the point where it will probably easily survive VfD.	2,005	true	user	random	train	false
21,294,258	== suggestion == If you're going to throw your weight around, may I suggest you do a little research first?	2,005	false	user	blocked	test	false
21,294,644	` I still don't get this. why ``as many as 79`` either it's 79, or it's not. Have you counted? if not, how did you arrive at this number? `	2,005	false	article	blocked	dev	false
21,295,277	` :From your comment, it doesn't look like it. It looks like a standard knee-jerk reaction to something someone doesn't like. However, if that's how things work around here, perhaps there should be a page on how to avoid such problems. btw, what happened to ``first warning`` (and maybe even second)? `	2,005	false	user	blocked	train	false
21,295,882	`, 18 August 2005 (UTC) I suppose my quarrel should be with him then. ``as many as`` in this context, suggests to me ``wow, what a lot of verses this word is in`` but I have found nothing (neither in the article, nor on this talk page) which would support such an interpretation. 15:43`	2,005	false	article	blocked	test	false
21,296,587	*Well, there's one other problem. The inserted material said, We have done our own research. In other words, this is original research.	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
21,297,979	::::wow, I am utterly humbled by your amazing condescension	2,005	false	user	blocked	test	false
21,307,894	If the LAW is a single use weapon, isn't this a disadvtage as compared to the original Bazooka (granted it does not leave a smoke trail and has no recoil).	2,005	false	article	blocked	test	false
21,308,007	== Progression from the Bazooka? == If the LAW is a single use weapon, isn't this a disadvtage as compared to the original Bazooka (granted it does not leave a smoke trail and has no recoil)? I think there should be mention of the reasoning of this change in the article.	2,005	false	article	blocked	train	false
21,310,875	:I couldn't say. but it looks like it will work -	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
21,315,305	Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around. Here are some tips to help you get started: To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes). Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area. * If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines. Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun! Good luck!	2,005	true	user	random	train	false
21,318,767	Its sooooooooooooo funny you got blocked! you think your god around here!	2,005	false	user	blocked	train	false
21,319,268	You must have a lot of kleenex by your computer for all the crying you do you baby! Grow up and get a life!	2,005	false	user	blocked	test	true
21,319,543	== David == Why are you such a bitch?	2,005	false	user	blocked	test	true
21,321,034	==Congo articles== What books and internet resources are you using for the pre-colonial Congo articles? -	2,005	true	user	blocked	test	false
21,322,285	::It's hard when there's a dozen of them -	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
21,323,310	===Superjob on cleanup!== ::Just came back to the page today, saw all the links now under 'See Also' - lays out really nice! Compliments to whoever made that edit.	2,005	true	article	random	dev	false
21,325,038	Adding nonsense about the New York times crossword isn't too clever. -	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
21,325,151	Do not repeatedly add nonsense to articles -	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
21,329,823	`I've included a passage of the bible on my user page. I want it to open the page, and will keep it here, because I feel it acentuates the writing that follows. so, without any further ado, here is some biblical goodness. THE BEST THINGS HAVE BEEN CULMINATED Zeal to promote the common good, whether it be by devising anything ourselves, or revising that which hath been laboured by others, deserveth certainly much respect and esteem, but yet findeth but cold entertainment in the world. It is welcomed with suspicion instead of love, and with emulation instead of thanks: and if there be any hole left for cavil to enter, (and cavil, if it do not find a hole, will make one) it is sure to be misconstrued, and in danger to be condemned. This will easily be granted by as many as know story, or have any experience. For, was there ever any-projected, that savoured any way of newness or renewing, but the same endured many a storm of gainsaying, or opposition? A man would think that Civility, wholesome Laws, learning and eloquence, Synods, and Church-maintenance, (that we speak of no more things of this kind) should be as safe as a Sanctuary, and out of shot, as they say, that no man would lift up the heel, no, nor dog move his tongue against the motioners of them. For by the first, we are distinguished from brute beasts lead with sensuality; By the second, we are bridled and restrained from outrageous behaviour, and from doing of injuries, whether by fraud or by violence; By the third, we are enabled to inform and reform others, by the light and feeling that we have attained unto ourselves; Briefly, by the fourth being brought together to a parley face to face, we sooner compose our differences than by writings which are endless; And lastly, that the Church be sufficiently provided for, is so agreeable to good reason and conscience, that those mothers are holden to be less cruel, that kill their children as soon as they are born, than those nursing fathers and mothers (wheresoever they be) that withdraw from them who hang upon their breasts (and upon whose breasts again themselves do hang to receive the Spiritual and sincere milk of the word) livelihood and support fit for their estates. Thus it is apparent, that these things which we speak of, are of most necessary use, and therefore, that none, either without absurdity can speak against them, or without note of wickedness can spurn against them. Yet for all that, the learned know that certain worthy men [Anacharsis with others] have been brought to untimely death for none other fault, but for seeking to reduce their Countrymen to god order and discipline; and that in some Commonwealths [e.g. Locri] it was made a capital crime, once to motion the making of a new Law for the abrogating of an old, though the same were most pernicious; And that certain [Cato the elder], which would be counted pillars of the State, and patterns of Virtue and Prudence, could not be brought for a long time to give way to good Letters and refined speech, but bare themselves as averse from them, as from rocks or boxes of poison; And fourthly, that he was no babe, but a great clerk [Gregory the Divine], that gave forth (and in writing to remain to posterity) in passion peradventure, but yet he gave forth, that he had not seen any profit to come by any Synod, or meeting of the Clergy, but rather the contrary; And lastly, against Church-maintenance and allowance, in such sort, as the Ambassadors and messengers of the great King of Kings should be furnished, it is not unknown what a fiction or fable (so it is esteemed, and for no better by the reporter himself [Nauclerus], though superstitious) was devised; Namely, that at such a time as the professors and teachers of Christianity in the Church of Rome, then a true Church, were liberally endowed, a voice forsooth was heard from heaven, saying: Now is poison poured down into the Church, etc. Thus not only as oft as we speak, as one saith, but also as oft as we do anything of note or consequence, we subject ourselves to everyone’s censure, and happy is he that is least tossed upon tongues; for utterly to escape the snatch of them it is impossible. If any man conceit, that this is the lot and portion of the meaner sort only, and that Princes are privileged by their high estate, he is deceived. ``As the sword devoureth as well one as the other,`` as it is in Samuel [2 Sam 11:25], nay as the great Commander charged his soldiers in a certain battle, to strike at no part of the enemy, but at the face; And as the King of Syria commanded his chief Captains to ``fight neither with small nor great, save only against the King of Israel:`` [1 Kings 22:31] so it is too true, that Envy striketh most spitefully at the fairest, and at the chiefest. David was a worthy Prince, and no man to be compared to him for his first deeds, and yet for as worthy as act as Preface to 1611 Translation iv ever he did (even for bringing back the Ark of God in solemnity) he was scorned and scoffed at by his own wife [2 Sam 6:16]. Solomon was greater than David, though not in virtue, yet in power: and by his power and wisdom he built a Temple to the Lord, such a one as was the glory of the land of Israel, and the wonder of the whole world. But was that his magnificence liked of by all? We doubt it. Otherwise, why do they lay it in his son’s dish, and call unto him for easing the burden, ``Make``, say they, ``the grievous servitude of thy father, and his sore yoke, lighter?`` [1 Kings 12:4] Belike he had charged them with some levies, and troubled them with some carriages; Hereupon they raise up a tragedy, and wish in their heart the Temple had never been built. So hard a thing it is to please all, even when we please God best, and do seek to approve ourselves to every ones conscience. If we will descend to later times, we shall find many the like examples of such kind, or rather unkind acceptance. The first Roman Emperor [C. Caesar. Plutarch] did never do a more pleasing deed to the learned, nor more profitable to posterity, for conserving the record of times in true supputation; than when he corrected the Calendar, and ordered the year according to the course of the Sun; and yet this was imputed to him for novelty, and arrogance, and procured to him great obloguy. So the first Christened Emperor [Constantine] (at the least-wise that openly professed the faith himself, and allowed others to do the like) for strengthening the Empire at his great charges, and providing for the Church, as he did, got for his labour the name Pupillus, as who would say, a wasteful Prince, that had need of a Guardian or overseer [Aurel. Victor]. So the best Christened Emperor [Theodosius], for the love that he bare unto peace, thereby to enrich both himself and his subjects, and because he did not see war but find it, was judged to be no man at arms [Zosimus], (though indeed he excelled in feats of chivalry, and showed so much when he was provoked) and condemned for giving himself to his ease, and to his pleasure. To be short, the most learned Emperor of former times [Justinian], (at the least, the greatest politician) what thanks had he for cutting off the superfluities of the laws, and digesting them into some order and method? This, that he had been blotted by some to be an Epitomist, that is, one that extinguishes worthy whole volumes, to bring his abridgments into request. This is the measure that hath been rendered to excellent Princes in former times, even, Cum bene facerent, male audire, For their good deeds to be evil spoken of. Neither is there any likelihood, that envy and malignity died, and were buried with the ancient. No, no, the reproof of Moses taketh hold of most ages; ``You are risen up in your fathers’ stead, and increase of sinful men.`` [Num 32:14] ``What is that that hath been done? that which shall be done; and there is no new thing under the Sun,`` saith the wiseman: [Ecc 1:9] and S. Stephen, ``As your fathers did, so do you.`` [Acts 7:51] HIS MAJESTY’S CONSTANCY, NOTWITHSTANDING CULMINATION, FOR THE SURVEY OF THE ENGLISH TRANSLATIONS This, and more to this purpose, His Majesty that now reigneth (and long, and long may he reign, and his offspring forever, ``Himself and children, and children’s always) knew full well, according to the singular wisdom given unto him by God, and the rare learning and experience that he hath attained unto; namely that whosoever attempteth anything for the public (especially if it pertain to Religion, and to the opening and clearing of the word of God) the same setteth himself upon a stage to be gloated upon by every evil eye, yea, he casteth himself headlong upon pikes, to be gored by every sharp tongue. For he that medleth with men’s Religion in any part, medleth with their custom, nay, with their freehold; and though they find no content in that which they have, yet they cannot abide to hear of altering. Notwithstanding his Royal heart was not daunted or discouraged for this that colour, but stood resolute, ``as a statue immovable, and an anvil not easy to be beaten into plates,`` as one [Suidas] saith; he knew who had chosen him to be a Soldier, or rather a Captain, and being assured that the course which he intended made for the glory of God, and the building up of his Church, he would not suffer it to be broken off for whatsoever speeches or practices. It	2,005	true	user	blocked	dev	false
21,330,127	dude, what's with the name? -	2,005	true	user	random	train	false
21,345,717	I agree in that it may be likely that many ancient civilisations would used implements like wheels around the same general period but documented evidence may say otherwise.	2,005	false	article	blocked	dev	false
21,351,877	==Title disputed== I would like to propose to add a notice, such as the following, to notify readers there is not only a content dispute, but also a dispute over the title. There is currently a dispute over the title of this article, between list of companies of mainland China and list of companies of the People's Republic of China. The current title does not endorse, and should not be seen as an endorsement of, any of the two. —	2,005	true	article	random	test	false
21,366,104	So what's this about then? I get a warning (see above) and then dcmdevit just blocks without warning or anything at all? Is this how it's supposed to work? I had understood that, after the comments that I exchange with Bishonen, I was on some sort of probation. I have notedited anything since then. So why is Dmcdevit blocking me? Is this supposed to be a serious project or is it just an ego trip for people such as dcmdevit?	2,005	false	user	blocked	train	false
21,379,382	A sockpuppet leave me alone.	2,005	true	user	blocked	dev	true
21,385,747	I agree with you Scoot, but bothie just keeps de;eting anything I say because boothy is a cock sucking fucker	2,005	false	user	blocked	test	true
21,387,430	Last warning for what???????????????/	2,005	false	user	blocked	train	false
21,388,170	== Prick == Hey Ryan, Fuck you faggot, how do you like those apples bitch?	2,005	false	user	blocked	dev	true
21,388,175	Hey Ryan, Fuck you faggot, how do you like those apples bitch?	2,005	false	user	blocked	test	true
21,388,282	tocBOOTHY IS A FUCKER	2,005	false	user	blocked	train	true
21,397,597	== Isle of Mann == The Isle of Mann isn't a country It is a dependancy of the British Crown(not the UK) 8/19/05 7:22 PM EST	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
21,403,851	: *Sieg heil Gamaliel! Thank you for that utterly worthless block which prevented me from adding more content and expanding upon articles on Wikipedia! Great way to demonstrate the spirit of spreading knowledge, by blocking people for stupid reasons! So keep on censoring.	2,005	true	user	blocked	test	false
21,405,568	`Will, if you'll please check out the Matt Slick article now, you'll see a ridiculous and transparent attempt to get past the 3RR. Between the constant legal threats, personal attacks, knee-jerk reverts, and deceptive tactics of ``Tom S 48``-slash-``Interested Party,`` (none of which I have to repeat here) I simply don't think this person can be worked with to make a good, NPOV article. I am fairly confident the person is here for one single reason: to remove evidence of criticism of CARM and Matt Slick. I think we agree that this evidence shouldn't be removed, and all attempts to work toward a version of the criticism acceptable to all parties (I've edited the thing ad nauseam) have failed. I am of the opinion that ``Tom S 48`` will be content with nothing other than a POV article in favor of Matt Slick. Can anything be done? `	2,005	true	user	random	train	false
21,405,832	::Hahahaha. WIE?! WIE?!!!!!! That is retarded. Internet Explorer was already long enough compared to say, Opera, Safari, or Firefox. Now it's Windows Internet Explorer? This browser goes down the shitter more every day.	2,005	true	article	blocked	dev	false
21,405,868	He had a show on mtv too...it was fuckin hilarious	2,005	false	article	random	test	false
21,461,705	So fuck off and die, rape fantasising sluts	2,005	false	article	blocked	train	true
21,469,763	` I fixed the red link for ``Merkle trees`` to point to my new article on Hash trees since I think they are the same thing. Although I am not entirely sure and will try to verify that. An hour of googling did not give me a conclusive answer. (The only proper description of Merkle Trees I found was on RSA labs site and very confusing.) `	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
21,493,244	` :There was no section of GKIF! There was however a section called ``The 'other' Genseiryu style`` that showed how this new Genseiryu style came alive according to WGKF. At the end of the paragraph there is a reference to GKIF and people can go there to read further... However, WGKF believes that the story of GKIF is wrong and is only told in that way so they can promote themselves better. The true history NEEDS to be told in the article about WGKF. It's their viewpoint and therefore important information for an understanding of the way WGKF thinks, trains and deals with the situation. The story on the GKIF page is their viewpoint, and I think they will find it important to tell this story for their own reasons... :I will see how this story can be rewritten, but it cannot be discarded totally from WGKF. `	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
21,496,475	` :This part is now totally rewritten to make the importance of this part clear: the reasons for the establishment of the WGKF. I did mention the GKIF with an internal link, since this is the Wikipedia way, even though I don't agree with what is written in that article. Just for the record: my hands are itching to change the misinformation and lies in that article as well, but I won't, since it would only start another edit war!! I believe it is a good thing to have ``their`` story on GKIF and ``our`` story here on WGKF. If each side would stay away from the other side, the edit war would finally be over! Now, there is the problem: we are willing to stay away from GKIF, but people from GKIF are not willing to stay away from WGKF! So WHO is keeping the edit war alive here??? `	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
21,509,859	` From The Thin Man by Dashiel Hammett: ``All right,`` I said, ``have me arrested for kidnapping, contributing to the delinquency of a minor and mopery.`` (near the end of chapter 10)`	2,005	true	article	random	dev	false
21,518,819	` == DrachenFyre Vandalism of a Woman == has begun a campaign to actively get rid of his virginity, and if he somehow succeeds in this million to one shot, he will vandalize a poor woman, as well as greatly disappoint her. Whilst the issue of DrachenFyre’s ``uselessness`` has been addressed by his bedroom being full of Power Ranger toys and sticky tissues, DrachenFyre has taken it upon himself to think he has a shot, he needs to know the truth. Please review his loserness and decide. Thank you. `	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
21,523,365	` ==Proposal of changing name and structure of this page == I propose to change this page and show in it only reference links to various comparison charts, because it fails to show (as stated in the title): [Quote] The table only includes systems that are widely used and currently available. Due to the large number and variety of available Linux distributions, all of these operating systems are grouped under a single entry in these tables. [End quote] It could have been called ``Comparison table of OSes recent than 5 years``, but it still presents MacOS and not only Mac OS X, that is the current selling version. (For example Windows'95 and windows'98 are both canceled from the table, and only Windows ME is shown. And it is correct. because both 9x versions are discontinued from market longer than 5 years.) OS/2 is discontinued, and IBM plans to release it Open Source, but it is still on the table. Linux OSes are shown apart. Their invoice is no longer (?) necessary. It lacks of OSes still on the market, such as AmigaOS, which recently started also 2 split versions, AROS and MorphOS (and also MorphOS it is currently on the market). [I wrote AmigaOS invoice in the table and I planned to insert MorphOS later]. It lacks of very interesting OSes currently on the market such as RTOS (Real Time Operating Systems), which major representative is QNX. Also it could have been called ``Comparison Table of Operating Systems with a million or larger userbase``, but then, FreeBSD and Solaris are far from reaching this record of installed releases. So I propose to create multiple pages of comparison charts, and this page pointing with respective links to each of them (Historical chart ones, OSes actually on the market, Linux Only, etcetera). But one chart amongst the others must be a very extensive comparison table showing all existing OSes, present and past ones, to be of reference for all readers, and mainly students and scholars. Criticisms and advices are welcome. Insert your Sign and say why, if you agree or refuse to change this page. [Whoops. Sorry. I am Raffaele_Megabyte, and I failed to log, becase I reconnected internet after a brief pause] : In my opinion the tables should list OSes that are widely used. However, use isn't the same as number of installed systems; that number just boosts desktop operating systems out of proportion. If, for example, a Solaris system runs an application server used by 100 users, that would really have to count as 100 users, not just one. A good measure might be how often an OS or services running on an OS are directly or indirectly used by how many users. Or to put it another way, the amount of ``real work`` done using that OS. (Of course this cannot really be measured, only estimated). : Basically I'm all for including OSes like QNX and similar systems, as right now the embedded operating systems are very under-represented. However, if we were to go down that road all the way, then we'd have to start including e.g. Symbian OS or Windows CE, too, and there isn't really much point in comparing e.g. Symbian OS to Solaris. : So if there was to be a split at all, I'd split it by target system type, i.e. server OSes, workstation/desktop OSes, embedded/realtime OSes. With that kind of split, many systems could be clearly assigned to one of the types, instead of having to maintain the same data multiple times. Also, splitting into multiple tables doesn't necessarily mean splitting into multiple articles. For example, it would be possible to simply have one section per target system type. : In either case, I'm very much against doing this kind of change in the ``reorganize first, fix later`` style, since a lot of changes tend to stop after the ``reorganize`` phase and never get around to actually filling in all the new content (E.g. I've seen a fair amount of people who insist that OS xyz has to be in the tables, but then can't actually be bothered to add more than a sketchy version of the ``general information`` data.) : Instead, I suggest you create the reorganized version as a page in your user namespace, and then post a link here for discussion. `	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
21,535,444	` ==reversion undone== No good reasons were given for removing my changes, and both they and I have been falsely described. I am not an academic. Nor do I believe that ``only people with european nonmedical academic doctorates deserve to be called doctor``. The only kind of doctorate is an academic one. Doctorates may be in medicine or any other subject. This is clear from the article, which the reverter appears not to have read properly. As for 'European', there is absolutely no Eurocentrism in the article. The US (a country with about 5% of the world's population) is exceptional in that bachelor's-level degrees in medicine are on paper called 'doctorates'. I left mention of this exception in the article. I believe, however, that it requires some explanation for those who might not be familiar with its exceptionality. So that's three lazy errors already in the reverter's blurb: calling me an academic; saying that I think those who don't hold European doctorates shouldn't be called doctors; saying that I think those who hold medical doctorates shouldn't be called doctorates. Fourth, I left a lot of it as it was. As for 'perspectives', I have no 'perspective' to offer. I was trying to keep to the facts. It is true that there is a history to this article, but this includes for example the mention by one discussant that 'doctor' is used as a noun to denote those with PhDs as well as to denote those who hold bachelor's-level degrees in medicine. That fact was not mentioned in the article itself before my changes. (It might also be mentioned that the use of 'PhD' to describe a person, as in 'John is a PhD' is not encountered in the UK - at least, not in my experience. You would say 'John has got a PhD). My version can doubtless be improved, but this will best be done by those who have read it and considered the merits of the particular changes. People read encyclopedias to learn new facts. Whilst I am not saying that this one should be prescriptive, this does not mean that ignorant beliefs should not be countered. For example, I have met people in the UK who think that medics are 'doctors of medicine' and that people with doctorates are 'doctors' of some other subject, as if the qualifications were on the same level. That they aren't, is a fact, not an opinion. (The exceptional case of the US MD should of course be covered too, and is). `	2,005	false	article	random	train	false
21,539,273	`: Everyone falls short in discussions compared to Tiger, who does have ten majors to Singh's three. Plus, Singh has also only really distinguished himself as being the second best golfer in the world behind Tiger since 2003. I think his age works against him a bit too, he was a late bloomer, and he is 42 now and it's not clear how much longer he's going to be at the top of his game. Popularity is a complex factor and there are always going to be a lot of reasons, not just one reason like he's from a different country. It's certainly possible that Singh gets a bit less attention than he might otherwise because he's not American, but recall when David Duval hit #1 in the world, it's not like he got a huge amount of attention for that. As for the ``Tiger wasn't doing his best`` line, that gets brought up with a lot of other golfers than just Vijay Singh. Re. the Google test, some other golf stars: Mickelson (744,000 hits), Els (349,000), Goosen (251,000), Nicklaus (760,000), Palmer (880,000), Garcia (326,000), Duval (120,000), Faldo (137,000). `	2,005	true	article	random	test	false
21,549,133	`:::``Nominally`` beautifully captures the formalism and bureaucracy involved in both ``invitiations.`` We should retain the word ``invitation`` however, as the Party spent alot of effort achieving those purely formal invitations to hide its shame. `	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
21,549,142	` Bad crap == What bunch of crazies wanted connection to the Force to be mystical instead of genetic? Movies like these shouldn't be mystical! It's about the happenings in a fictional galaxy, not some weird spiritual garbage! The only time it should be spiritual is if it were referencing Christianity, and referencing it correctly at that! :I, for one, am an atheist and don't believe in all that spiritual crap myself. However, I think that mysticism in stories makes them much, well… better. It also enhances the theme. How does it do that? :Scorpionman, what makes you think that a movie should only be spiritual if it references Christianity and not another religion? — I suppose that depends on your point of view. I'm not relativistic, but when it comes to things like science fiction, there's no need for spiritual stuff. ::In fact, I was disappointed when I learned that the Jedi use some mystical substance that can't be measured scientifically. It would make more sense for me if they were just highly-trained concentrated people. - :::The Jedi don't really use the midi-clorians. The midi-clorians just connect them to the Force, and the Force is what the Jedi use. ::::By ``some mystical substance that can't be measured scientifically`` I mean the Force. I'm quite disappointed by its very existence in Star Wars. - I don't really think it needs to reference ANY religion. Science fiction is science fiction! If you think it needs to reference Islam, that's your opinion. :I don't think he ever mentioned Islam. ::I am not sure to whom the anonymous editor was referring (I don't see any reference to Islam either), and I suppose this discussion isn't really relevant here anyway. But for the record, I have no problem with spirituality without reference to a specific or already-existing religion, especially in something like Star Wars where the connection of the ``humans`` to us is obscure (since it takes place during ancient times in a distant galaxy). I was responding to Scorpionman's odd (in my opinion) comment that movies should only be spiritual if they reference Christianity instead of other religions. I personally think it's better to stay away from specific religions. — I really would rather have it not reference spirituality, but my ``weird comment`` stating that it should only reference Christianity is my point of view. I know not everybody agrees, but I really would rather it all be purely technological and scientific. :The Force is a power that can not easily be conceived, my young padawan. We must learn to harness its energies, let it flow through us. Only then can we become one with the Force. Is Yoda really an atheist? :Yes. He worships the Force. Oh. 7 July 2005 11:34 (UTC) ==`	2,005	true	article	blocked	test	false
21,559,365	` ``Strong encrypted F2F networks will mainly use strong symmetric encryption (in particular, the only theoretically secure one-time pad) for every link.`` Who ever wrote this article could do with a brush up on practical cryptography (no..not the book). OTP is pretty unpractical here.`	2,005	false	article	blocked	train	false
21,565,715	` == Your email. == ``The fact that Ryan engages in 'cock foreplay' indicates that he is probably a homosexual.```	2,005	true	user	blocked	test	true
21,585,045	== Passing comment == A wise choice voting to keep the Wikiproject. Integrity is the key to any person's judgement. It's good to know that you can make the right call when something important goes up for deletion.	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
21,591,381	* He insulted me first. To be fair, you should warn him, as well. That's what we call JUSTICE.	2,005	true	user	blocked	test	false
21,593,939	`:If by ``seen in the past`` you mean in a historical time frame, I agree, but I stated it was comparable, we've been warming for more than a century and it is only on the last decade that we have exceeded the temperature a millenia ago, and given the error bars in the temperature proxies even that is uncertain, but the trend is certainly there. It may seem unfair, but the burden of proof is not on the skeptics, they have the easy job, the consensus was correctly criticized for being unable to explain the satellite data and the residual balloon discrepency. Now they are in better agreement, but the discrepencies are still great enough to call into question the range of IPCC predictions. Perhaps the injustice in the burden of proof is compensated by the greater funding and employment on the ``believer`` side. The skeptics can get by with far fewer people and less funding for research. Model the clouds better, model the data better, and couple the ocean better, and better incorporate direct and indirect solar influence and the error bars should go down. Do all that and even if the predictions come in at the high end of the range, the Kyoto treaty may still be completely ill advised and a tremendous waste of human wealth and potential. It just ain't fair! I hope you agree that it is fair to demand better science when hundreds of billions of dollars are being committed on the predictions. This is more than an admittedly interesting academic exercise. `	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
21,597,141	== A request == Perhaps you might be willing to restore the Wikiproject to this version http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Wikipedians_for_Decency&oldid;=21575756? It's been protected due to bad faith edit warring, but it was protected to the wrong version (by accident?) Thanks.	2,005	true	user	blocked	test	false
21,603,257	I added some external links but someone deleted two as too general. Emmerson and melissa from leaky cauldron and mugglenet were specifically invited to interview JKR just after half blood prince was published. She rates them highly and has given her 'best website' award to them. So they are good references for anyone wanting to know more. The two specific links are to the opening page, but anyone linking there could then find out more. There are many pages on each which would be relevant, and also changing, so I do not see the sense in listing all possible pages from the website. Wiki recommend citing sources and places for further information.	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
21,606,229	== Nice rewrites... == ...on Mother Theresa. Keep it up.	2,005	true	user	random	train	false
21,612,709	:::Replied in my own User Talk page, and dropped copyright complaints for your image. (In addition, added reference to your image in the original infringing image, so that people know to use yours instead.)	2,005	true	user	random	dev	false
21,614,493	Why do you make films?	2,005	false	article	blocked	test	false
21,614,786	** had no information on his user page, and it was doubtful he ever would put anything there himself. I see no reason, then, why we should not imagine what this fine gentlement should actually be like. I imagined him as a large black man who served in the coast guard and later went on to own several dry cleaners. Who is to say that is not his true nature? Not you, that is for sure.	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
21,630,790	== Substitution Rapid == Once in a while...Regular Local Buses (Painted Orange) are used on Metro Rapid Service when there is a shortage on red buses.	2,005	false	article	blocked	train	false
21,642,424	u r sooooooooooooo gay	2,005	false	user	blocked	test	true
21,653,454	Well, this chap isn't a sockpuppet of me, and I resent the outrageous accusation. You can enter that into the offical LOG.	2,005	true	user	blocked	test	false
21,661,309	*See discussion with anon about links in question here []	2,005	false	article	blocked	train	false
21,671,588	== Whoops == What!? You blocked me from editting? Damn...oh wait, nevermind, you're just an idiot. p.s. I'm not a person, I'm a reminder.	2,005	false	user	blocked	train	true
21,680,867	==Psychological views== Could someone explain and discuss the psychological views and developments Francis Bacon had and led/added to?	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
21,684,416	` == Fare Thee Weel, My Fine Friend! == I'm back in town for a day and thought I'd drop by again. I took a look at how your RFAr was coming along, as well as your evidence you are marshalling in your ``Sandbox`` at []. I must say I am rather disappointed at the slight nature of said evidence. Not that I'm going to be around, but I'm sure you don't have a very strong hand, as it were. As I've said before, I've already explained the alternate accounts, and users Casito (and Soltak also to a smaller extent) have been just as uncivil to me as I had been to them. Casito basically accused me of being a pedophile/stalker of some kind in his statement to the Arbitration Committee after all. One thing that did seriously concern me and that I'd like to, if you please, elucidate, is that Casito's statement about ``website defacement`` being a ``crime`` in ``many jurisdictions`` is absolutely 100% misleading in our context. First, there are no local jurisdictional issues here, the Internet is regulated at the national level in the U.S. (I'm sure you knew that). Second, like I told Casito, this is a Wiki, any changes on here, no matter how malicious, do not rise to the level of ``defacement,`` which pertains more to secure/static websites (think US Govt homepages for instance). I don't know whether he realised this, but in practical terms what Casito said was misleading on both legal and practical grounds, a bluff if you will. Of course he didn't realise that I could see through his bluff, and when I calmly explained these two above points to him, he got really defensive and quite ``pissy,`` just as I'm sure he would in real life. Just between you and me, he just doesn't seem like a really ``cool kid.`` For you, however, I have the utmost respect, being a liberal arts Professor in the only civilised part of the U.S. as far as I'm concerned. However, you might want to hurry up presenting your evidence, since I'm once again leaving the country at 8:55 am tommorrow and won't be back until next month; and as I said on my user page, I won't be editing on Wikipedia any more after I get back to work and my routine, etc. But take care, don't take any crap from those snotty preppy know-it-all kids you have up there (and how would I know about that hmmmmm????) )!! `	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
21,688,758	the normal style for these talk pages. Did you know you can generate the signature by typing four tildes: ~~~~.)	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
21,690,597	Where does this come from?	2,005	true	article	blocked	test	false
21,694,782	:One page could easily accommodate all episodes. A whole page for this stuff is ridiculous. The guides are poorly written and edited by the way; someone will have to come in and correct typos, etc. Also, the episodes should be numbered, like other television shows. The user should register and log in, by the way, so we can communicate on his or her talk page instead of individual discussion pages.	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
21,695,417	` :Further thoughts: I did a look-up for the Seinfeld show; this show has one page for all episodes. You can use it for a model. If a nine-year-running show, the most talked about and watched in history, can accommodate all episodes in one page, then so can The Fairly OddParents. Remember, this isn't a hobby site for you to collect your private thoughts and feelings on arcane matters. Some of your ``trivia`` items are really reviews of the show. This is not in keeping with Wikipedia. Any opinions about episodes should be deleted. Follow the Seinfeld model and you'll do well. Good luck. `	2,005	true	article	blocked	test	false
21,701,792	To the person who created this page: Thanks for your work getting this article going! It sounds like an interesting film. Please note that there is a really easy way to create internal link within Wikipedia just add two brackets, not one, on either side of the word you want to link. Good luck with future editing.	2,005	true	article	blocked	test	false
21,703,466	Please avoid turning this article into a promotional piece for the show.	2,005	true	article	blocked	test	false
21,714,863	your fucking face. faggots	2,005	true	user	blocked	test	true
21,719,938	:: The project wasn't vandalised. I simply edited the user list to removed 3 members who were considered bad faith.	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
21,720,541	:::The second project, Wikipedians against censorship is a cynical trolling campaign lead by Gorgonzilla, a well know problem user. It would be entirely inappropriate to merge the two.	2,005	true	user	blocked	dev	false
21,726,466	` :Apology accepted and no hard feelings! Regards, 13:58:33, 2005-08-24 (UTC)`	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
21,727,778	That's funny, TDC violates the 3RR, 10 zillion sock puppets come along to help restore his edits, and what do his edits say?? John Kerry is a commie thank god you didn't jump to any conclusions and ban him or anything	2,005	false	user	blocked	train	false
21,728,427	` ==Research== In the summary of a, so called ``edit``, by an anonymous user of whom we all know it's , done on the 24th of August 2005 (couple of times) it's written: (This version is the most reliable version according to any facts, and according to any source!!! All herein is researched. Mario Roering is a twisted insane person and so are his edits!) Besides the fact that he keeps calling me all kinds of names to which I can only comment look in the mirror!, he is talking about some ``research``. Let me tell you here that this alleged research is the research performed by one single man (you guessed: Peter Lee!). I do not know if he really researched it all and is deliberately twisting the truth, but I have done a counter-research, together with a colleague, and came to a whole bunch of different conclusions!!! So far for this by Peter Lee so called ``research`` then... Now, researched or not, this article here is about WGKF, the World Genseiryu Karatedo Federation. Everything written here is their point of view. It is not necessary to start every single sentence with ``according to WGKF...``, since it is already the title of the article, so it must be clear to anybody that this is about them, from them and according to them! Deleting the facts (researched or not) and replacing them with the 'facts' from one single person who claims to have done research, but only brings in HIS point of view, makes the whole article about something that is NOT WGKF, but maybe about Peter Lee, or, just maybe, about GKIF... And of course that is absolutely wrong! That is not what the article is about... Nobody sees people from WGKF changing the story on GKIF, do you?? 14:36:29, 2005-08-24 (UTC)`	2,005	true	article	blocked	test	false
21,728,948	` :Yeah, sorry... Got a little carried away when I saw all the insulting language about me in the other summaries... This guy is really pissing me off sometimes, especially now he is hiding behind all the different ip addresses, in stead of showing what a 'man' he is and use !! BTW, I did write a message on the so-called 'research' on the talk page... 14:46:19, 2005-08-24 (UTC)`	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
21,729,462	Why is PBS used instead of ordinary saline?	2,005	false	article	blocked	dev	false
21,731,125	` ==Chicken-Ryu?== All the ip addresses you used so far, for your (sneaky) vandalist actions and keeping the edit war alive: * * * * * * * * * * * * * (This list is probably not even complete!!) In stead of hiding behind all kinds of different ip addresses, you could at least have the guts and the decency to insult me using your own name!?! Or are you chickin'??? Maybe you can change the name of your style (Genseiryu-Butokukai) into Chicken-Ryu??? Wouldn't even be so bad, since your McDojo is after all called ``Kentucky-Kai``!!! -)) At least I am not afraid to use my own name, especially since I know I have nothing to hide and I am on the right side! P.S.: are you still gonna answer the question above here (Genseiryu-Genseikan)???`	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	true
21,731,718	`:Thank you! Sometimes I do get a little bit carried away however. Not hard to believe regarding all the insults and name slandering I have to endure from this guy ... But, I will try to work as much as possible in a Wikipedia way and listen to all the advice you and JeremyA gave me... `	2,005	true	user	blocked	test	false
21,735,658	:Show some gratitude BITCH )	2,005	true	user	blocked	test	true
21,738,177	Mr Swine has not been blocked yet, absolutely miraculous - surely only a matter of time before he is nobbled -	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
21,738,332	:c'mon BITCH, speak up.	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	true
21,739,682	:As you are a FilePile member (number 3543), you can verify the screenshot by going to FilePile. -	2,005	true	user	blocked	dev	false

21,240,062

Coming out of the closet are we...Your pic gives off a definite gay-vibe

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

true

21,242,258

== Quoting Uncle Joey == A: There's always a 'chance'. Don't quote me on this, but it would be difficult to try and re-negotiate with the producers, actors and the studio. So I feel strongly that it would never happen. Way to quote him there, faggots. What do you think don't quote me means?

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

21,248,003

I consider Ann Coulter a right-wing nut. I may, in fact, be Coulterophobic. )

2,005

false

article

blocked

train

false

21,248,704

` :Actually, the M6 was planned first - it was to be a ``guinea pig`` road, which spawned the M1 later. The M6 at Preston originally opened as dual 2 lane, with soft shoulders, which, apart from an extra lane each way, was exactly how the M1 was constructed. The media aren't a reliable source with roads history. Archive material from planning offices, however, is. For what it's worth - construction of the M62 began first, with the embankments for the Barton Bridge being placed in anticipation for the eventual Stratford-Eccles Bypass. `

2,005

false

article

random

test

false

21,249,555

::::SHE IS NOT FULLY CLOTHED. She clearly has on an immodest bikini top that shows off her breasts in their practical entirety. With breasts that large she should cover up quite a bit so as not to titillate or offend, a good appropriate modest dress would be some heavy sweaters or jackets that covered her obscene figure. -

2,005

true

article

blocked

dev

false

21,262,577

` ::I listed that Weinstein and Vasilliev book in VENONA or elsewhere as a reference though I don't believe it was cited. However, there was a dispute between the two mostly over the characterization of material related to Hiss which is a single point always played upon by the anti-revisionists (to label them respectfully), similar to how it is always heard that two editors of The Black Book of Communism dissociated themselves from a few remarks in the intro. Nothing substantive but broad smears. ::Incidentally I have the ``Battleground: Berlin`` book but haven't looked through it much. `

2,005

true

user

random

dev

false

21,270,323

August 2005 (UTC) Fuck you guys. I had to look up what you mean by sockpuppet, and I assure you I have never met those two awesome dudes in my life. Maybe you need to accept that more and more people know Aquman is an cocksucker. By the way, I don't shove my fist up anyone's ass but my girlfriend's. Thank you very much. 05:40, 18

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

true

21,271,322

Stripper Wonder Woman dresses like a stripper. The cleavage and the high heeled boots and the whip. C'mon. This needs to be addressed in the article.

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

21,271,625

Oh, but you're happy to do so when it's in defense of your boyfriend Aquaman.

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

21,273,330

==Homo not homo== As you invited criticism, all generic names must be capitalised even when abbreviated. Thus its 'Homo' not 'homo'if you dont know the difference 'you should get out more' You imply that the course of evolution has led to continually greater brain sizes. This is not true. Eric A. Warbuton

2,005

true

user

random

test

false

21,274,766

` == Ejectives == Were there ejectives in PIE? Read the following quotation: ``The central tenet of the Glottalic Theory of the Proto-Indo-European obstruent system is that what has been traditionally reconstructed as a plain voiced stop series can be more convincingly reconstructed as a series of ejectives, which are inherently voiceless. However, the abundant evidence that this series was voiced has led to outright rejection by many of the Glottalic Theory. In an apparent attempt to obviate these objections, Frederick Kortlandt claims to have found ample comparative evidence that this series underwent a change from ejectives to implosives to voiced stops in several branches of Indo-European. In this address evidence will be presented to demonstrate that Kortlandt's implosive model is fraught with implausibility and inconsistencies and should also be rejected.`` (Simpson Humanities Center) So, the evidence that Germanic (aspirated or not) *p *t *k, as well as Armenian non-aspirated *p *t *k stand for original voiced stops is abundant. Charles Barrack demonstrated that even Kortland's attempt (ejective *t’ > implosive *d’ > Germanic *t(h) = Indian d) causes objections. `

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

21,276,240

` ==Trichophilia== ``Harry Benjamin was also a hair fetishist`` - posted by 71.34.2.142. Any evidence to support this? - `

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

21,277,469

That is a disgusting statement.

2,005

false

article

blocked

train

false

21,277,562

website :-:: Thai bangkaew dog http://www.chumsang.net/index2.php Thai Bangkaew dogs. one of Thailand 's most famous Breeds. They love bathing and Swimming Skills. http://www.chumsang.net/Eg/BannerEg_Thai-Bangkaew_dog.gif http://www.chumsang.net/newspic/BK/TS2.JPG http://www.chumsang.net/Eg/PT02.JPG

2,005

true

user

random

train

false

21,281,928

== What did I do? == I've just got a message from Gamaliel, telling me that I have vandalised Wikipedia, and I will be banned pernamently if I do it again! There has been some kind of mistake! I think the problem is that I (and the vandaliser) are both going through Internode, my ISP. Please, I read the wiki all the time, but have never changed anything before! Please, fix this mistake!

2,005

false

user

blocked

train

false

21,283,579

` What do you mean ``... as many as 79 verses...`` can't you count you lazy git? `

2,005

false

article

blocked

dev

true

21,283,671

==Jive.exe== I've already done so. Both and I thought it was just fine for a stub. In its short life it has been speedied several times, recreated from scratch once by the longsuffering author, and restored from archive twice by me. If you look at the current version you'll see that it was very easy to expand to the point where it will probably easily survive VfD.

2,005

true

user

random

train

false

21,294,258

== suggestion == If you're going to throw your weight around, may I suggest you do a little research first?

2,005

false

user

blocked

test

false

21,294,644

` I still don't get this. why ``as many as 79`` either it's 79, or it's not. Have you counted? if not, how did you arrive at this number? `

2,005

false

article

blocked

dev

false

21,295,277

` :From your comment, it doesn't look like it. It looks like a standard knee-jerk reaction to something someone doesn't like. However, if that's how things work around here, perhaps there should be a page on how to avoid such problems. btw, what happened to ``first warning`` (and maybe even second)? `

2,005

false

user

blocked

train

false

21,295,882

`, 18 August 2005 (UTC) I suppose my quarrel should be with him then. ``as many as`` in this context, suggests to me ``wow, what a lot of verses this word is in`` but I have found nothing (neither in the article, nor on this talk page) which would support such an interpretation. 15:43`

2,005

false

article

blocked

test

false

21,296,587

*Well, there's one other problem. The inserted material said, We have done our own research. In other words, this is original research.

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

21,297,979

::::wow, I am utterly humbled by your amazing condescension

2,005

false

user

blocked

test

false

21,307,894

If the LAW is a single use weapon, isn't this a disadvtage as compared to the original Bazooka (granted it does not leave a smoke trail and has no recoil).

2,005

false

article

blocked

test

false

21,308,007

== Progression from the Bazooka? == If the LAW is a single use weapon, isn't this a disadvtage as compared to the original Bazooka (granted it does not leave a smoke trail and has no recoil)? I think there should be mention of the reasoning of this change in the article.

2,005

false

article

blocked

train

false

21,310,875

:I couldn't say. but it looks like it will work -

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

21,315,305

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around. Here are some tips to help you get started: *To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes). * Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area. * If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk *Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset * Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines. *Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view * Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun! Good luck!

2,005

true

user

random

train

false

21,318,767

Its sooooooooooooo funny you got blocked! you think your god around here!

2,005

false

user

blocked

train

false

21,319,268

You must have a lot of kleenex by your computer for all the crying you do you baby! Grow up and get a life!

2,005

false

user

blocked

test

true

21,319,543

== David == Why are you such a bitch?

2,005

false

user

blocked

test

true

21,321,034

==Congo articles== What books and internet resources are you using for the pre-colonial Congo articles? -

2,005

true

user

blocked

test

false

21,322,285

::It's hard when there's a dozen of them -

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

21,323,310

===Superjob on cleanup!== ::Just came back to the page today, saw all the links now under 'See Also' - lays out really nice! Compliments to whoever made that edit.

2,005

true

article

random

dev

false

21,325,038

Adding nonsense about the New York times crossword isn't too clever. -

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

21,325,151

Do not repeatedly add nonsense to articles -

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

21,329,823

`I've included a passage of the bible on my user page. I want it to open the page, and will keep it here, because I feel it acentuates the writing that follows. so, without any further ado, here is some biblical goodness. THE BEST THINGS HAVE BEEN CULMINATED Zeal to promote the common good, whether it be by devising anything ourselves, or revising that which hath been laboured by others, deserveth certainly much respect and esteem, but yet findeth but cold entertainment in the world. It is welcomed with suspicion instead of love, and with emulation instead of thanks: and if there be any hole left for cavil to enter, (and cavil, if it do not find a hole, will make one) it is sure to be misconstrued, and in danger to be condemned. This will easily be granted by as many as know story, or have any experience. For, was there ever any-projected, that savoured any way of newness or renewing, but the same endured many a storm of gainsaying, or opposition? A man would think that Civility, wholesome Laws, learning and eloquence, Synods, and Church-maintenance, (that we speak of no more things of this kind) should be as safe as a Sanctuary, and out of shot, as they say, that no man would lift up the heel, no, nor dog move his tongue against the motioners of them. For by the first, we are distinguished from brute beasts lead with sensuality; By the second, we are bridled and restrained from outrageous behaviour, and from doing of injuries, whether by fraud or by violence; By the third, we are enabled to inform and reform others, by the light and feeling that we have attained unto ourselves; Briefly, by the fourth being brought together to a parley face to face, we sooner compose our differences than by writings which are endless; And lastly, that the Church be sufficiently provided for, is so agreeable to good reason and conscience, that those mothers are holden to be less cruel, that kill their children as soon as they are born, than those nursing fathers and mothers (wheresoever they be) that withdraw from them who hang upon their breasts (and upon whose breasts again themselves do hang to receive the Spiritual and sincere milk of the word) livelihood and support fit for their estates. Thus it is apparent, that these things which we speak of, are of most necessary use, and therefore, that none, either without absurdity can speak against them, or without note of wickedness can spurn against them. Yet for all that, the learned know that certain worthy men [Anacharsis with others] have been brought to untimely death for none other fault, but for seeking to reduce their Countrymen to god order and discipline; and that in some Commonwealths [e.g. Locri] it was made a capital crime, once to motion the making of a new Law for the abrogating of an old, though the same were most pernicious; And that certain [Cato the elder], which would be counted pillars of the State, and patterns of Virtue and Prudence, could not be brought for a long time to give way to good Letters and refined speech, but bare themselves as averse from them, as from rocks or boxes of poison; And fourthly, that he was no babe, but a great clerk [Gregory the Divine], that gave forth (and in writing to remain to posterity) in passion peradventure, but yet he gave forth, that he had not seen any profit to come by any Synod, or meeting of the Clergy, but rather the contrary; And lastly, against Church-maintenance and allowance, in such sort, as the Ambassadors and messengers of the great King of Kings should be furnished, it is not unknown what a fiction or fable (so it is esteemed, and for no better by the reporter himself [Nauclerus], though superstitious) was devised; Namely, that at such a time as the professors and teachers of Christianity in the Church of Rome, then a true Church, were liberally endowed, a voice forsooth was heard from heaven, saying: Now is poison poured down into the Church, etc. Thus not only as oft as we speak, as one saith, but also as oft as we do anything of note or consequence, we subject ourselves to everyone’s censure, and happy is he that is least tossed upon tongues; for utterly to escape the snatch of them it is impossible. If any man conceit, that this is the lot and portion of the meaner sort only, and that Princes are privileged by their high estate, he is deceived. ``As the sword devoureth as well one as the other,`` as it is in Samuel [2 Sam 11:25], nay as the great Commander charged his soldiers in a certain battle, to strike at no part of the enemy, but at the face; And as the King of Syria commanded his chief Captains to ``fight neither with small nor great, save only against the King of Israel:`` [1 Kings 22:31] so it is too true, that Envy striketh most spitefully at the fairest, and at the chiefest. David was a worthy Prince, and no man to be compared to him for his first deeds, and yet for as worthy as act as Preface to 1611 Translation iv ever he did (even for bringing back the Ark of God in solemnity) he was scorned and scoffed at by his own wife [2 Sam 6:16]. Solomon was greater than David, though not in virtue, yet in power: and by his power and wisdom he built a Temple to the Lord, such a one as was the glory of the land of Israel, and the wonder of the whole world. But was that his magnificence liked of by all? We doubt it. Otherwise, why do they lay it in his son’s dish, and call unto him for easing the burden, ``Make``, say they, ``the grievous servitude of thy father, and his sore yoke, lighter?`` [1 Kings 12:4] Belike he had charged them with some levies, and troubled them with some carriages; Hereupon they raise up a tragedy, and wish in their heart the Temple had never been built. So hard a thing it is to please all, even when we please God best, and do seek to approve ourselves to every ones conscience. If we will descend to later times, we shall find many the like examples of such kind, or rather unkind acceptance. The first Roman Emperor [C. Caesar. Plutarch] did never do a more pleasing deed to the learned, nor more profitable to posterity, for conserving the record of times in true supputation; than when he corrected the Calendar, and ordered the year according to the course of the Sun; and yet this was imputed to him for novelty, and arrogance, and procured to him great obloguy. So the first Christened Emperor [Constantine] (at the least-wise that openly professed the faith himself, and allowed others to do the like) for strengthening the Empire at his great charges, and providing for the Church, as he did, got for his labour the name Pupillus, as who would say, a wasteful Prince, that had need of a Guardian or overseer [Aurel. Victor]. So the best Christened Emperor [Theodosius], for the love that he bare unto peace, thereby to enrich both himself and his subjects, and because he did not see war but find it, was judged to be no man at arms [Zosimus], (though indeed he excelled in feats of chivalry, and showed so much when he was provoked) and condemned for giving himself to his ease, and to his pleasure. To be short, the most learned Emperor of former times [Justinian], (at the least, the greatest politician) what thanks had he for cutting off the superfluities of the laws, and digesting them into some order and method? This, that he had been blotted by some to be an Epitomist, that is, one that extinguishes worthy whole volumes, to bring his abridgments into request. This is the measure that hath been rendered to excellent Princes in former times, even, Cum bene facerent, male audire, For their good deeds to be evil spoken of. Neither is there any likelihood, that envy and malignity died, and were buried with the ancient. No, no, the reproof of Moses taketh hold of most ages; ``You are risen up in your fathers’ stead, and increase of sinful men.`` [Num 32:14] ``What is that that hath been done? that which shall be done; and there is no new thing under the Sun,`` saith the wiseman: [Ecc 1:9] and S. Stephen, ``As your fathers did, so do you.`` [Acts 7:51] HIS MAJESTY’S CONSTANCY, NOTWITHSTANDING CULMINATION, FOR THE SURVEY OF THE ENGLISH TRANSLATIONS This, and more to this purpose, His Majesty that now reigneth (and long, and long may he reign, and his offspring forever, ``Himself and children, and children’s always) knew full well, according to the singular wisdom given unto him by God, and the rare learning and experience that he hath attained unto; namely that whosoever attempteth anything for the public (especially if it pertain to Religion, and to the opening and clearing of the word of God) the same setteth himself upon a stage to be gloated upon by every evil eye, yea, he casteth himself headlong upon pikes, to be gored by every sharp tongue. For he that medleth with men’s Religion in any part, medleth with their custom, nay, with their freehold; and though they find no content in that which they have, yet they cannot abide to hear of altering. Notwithstanding his Royal heart was not daunted or discouraged for this that colour, but stood resolute, ``as a statue immovable, and an anvil not easy to be beaten into plates,`` as one [Suidas] saith; he knew who had chosen him to be a Soldier, or rather a Captain, and being assured that the course which he intended made for the glory of God, and the building up of his Church, he would not suffer it to be broken off for whatsoever speeches or practices. It

2,005

true

user

blocked

dev

false

21,330,127

dude, what's with the name? -

2,005

true

user

random

train

false

21,345,717

I agree in that it may be likely that many ancient civilisations would used implements like wheels around the same general period but documented evidence may say otherwise.

2,005

false

article

blocked

dev

false

21,351,877

==Title disputed== I would like to propose to add a notice, such as the following, to notify readers there is not only a content dispute, but also a dispute over the title. There is currently a dispute over the title of this article, between list of companies of mainland China and list of companies of the People's Republic of China. The current title does not endorse, and should not be seen as an endorsement of, any of the two. —

2,005

true

article

random

test

false

21,366,104

So what's this about then? I get a warning (see above) and then dcmdevit just blocks without warning or anything at all? Is this how it's supposed to work? I had understood that, after the comments that I exchange with Bishonen, I was on some sort of probation. I have notedited anything since then. So why is Dmcdevit blocking me? Is this supposed to be a serious project or is it just an ego trip for people such as dcmdevit?

2,005

false

user

blocked

train

false

21,379,382

A sockpuppet leave me alone.

2,005

true

user

blocked

dev

true

21,385,747

I agree with you Scoot, but bothie just keeps de;eting anything I say because boothy is a cock sucking fucker

2,005

false

user

blocked

test

true

21,387,430

Last warning for what???????????????/

2,005

false

user

blocked

train

false

21,388,170

== Prick == Hey Ryan, Fuck you faggot, how do you like those apples bitch?

2,005

false

user

blocked

dev

true

21,388,175

Hey Ryan, Fuck you faggot, how do you like those apples bitch?

2,005

false

user

blocked

test

true

21,388,282

tocBOOTHY IS A FUCKER

2,005

false

user

blocked

train

true

21,397,597

== Isle of Mann == The Isle of Mann isn't a country It is a dependancy of the British Crown(not the UK) 8/19/05 7:22 PM EST

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

21,403,851

: *Sieg heil Gamaliel! Thank you for that utterly worthless block which prevented me from adding more content and expanding upon articles on Wikipedia! Great way to demonstrate the spirit of spreading knowledge, by blocking people for stupid reasons! So keep on censoring.

2,005

true

user

blocked

test

false

21,405,568

`Will, if you'll please check out the Matt Slick article now, you'll see a ridiculous and transparent attempt to get past the 3RR. Between the constant legal threats, personal attacks, knee-jerk reverts, and deceptive tactics of ``Tom S 48``-slash-``Interested Party,`` (none of which I have to repeat here) I simply don't think this person can be worked with to make a good, NPOV article. I am fairly confident the person is here for one single reason: to remove evidence of criticism of CARM and Matt Slick. I think we agree that this evidence shouldn't be removed, and all attempts to work toward a version of the criticism acceptable to all parties (I've edited the thing ad nauseam) have failed. I am of the opinion that ``Tom S 48`` will be content with nothing other than a POV article in favor of Matt Slick. Can anything be done? `

2,005

true

user

random

train

false

21,405,832

::Hahahaha. WIE?! WIE?!!!!!! That is retarded. Internet Explorer was already long enough compared to say, Opera, Safari, or Firefox. Now it's Windows Internet Explorer? This browser goes down the shitter more every day.

2,005

true

article

blocked

dev

false

21,405,868

He had a show on mtv too...it was fuckin hilarious

2,005

false

article

random

test

false

21,461,705

So fuck off and die, rape fantasising sluts

2,005

false

article

blocked

train

true

21,469,763

` I fixed the red link for ``Merkle trees`` to point to my new article on Hash trees since I think they are the same thing. Although I am not entirely sure and will try to verify that. An hour of googling did not give me a conclusive answer. (The only proper description of Merkle Trees I found was on RSA labs site and very confusing.) `

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

21,493,244

` :There was no section of GKIF! There was however a section called ``The 'other' Genseiryu style`` that showed how this new Genseiryu style came alive according to WGKF. At the end of the paragraph there is a reference to GKIF and people can go there to read further... However, WGKF believes that the story of GKIF is wrong and is only told in that way so they can promote themselves better. The true history NEEDS to be told in the article about WGKF. It's their viewpoint and therefore important information for an understanding of the way WGKF thinks, trains and deals with the situation. The story on the GKIF page is their viewpoint, and I think they will find it important to tell this story for their own reasons... :I will see how this story can be rewritten, but it cannot be discarded totally from WGKF. `

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

21,496,475

` :This part is now totally rewritten to make the importance of this part clear: the reasons for the establishment of the WGKF. I did mention the GKIF with an internal link, since this is the Wikipedia way, even though I don't agree with what is written in that article. Just for the record: my hands are itching to change the misinformation and lies in that article as well, but I won't, since it would only start another edit war!! I believe it is a good thing to have ``their`` story on GKIF and ``our`` story here on WGKF. If each side would stay away from the other side, the edit war would finally be over! Now, there is the problem: we are willing to stay away from GKIF, but people from GKIF are not willing to stay away from WGKF! So WHO is keeping the edit war alive here??? `

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

21,509,859

` From The Thin Man by Dashiel Hammett: ``All right,`` I said, ``have me arrested for kidnapping, contributing to the delinquency of a minor and mopery.`` (near the end of chapter 10)`

2,005

true

article

random

dev

false

21,518,819

` == DrachenFyre Vandalism of a Woman == has begun a campaign to actively get rid of his virginity, and if he somehow succeeds in this million to one shot, he will vandalize a poor woman, as well as greatly disappoint her. Whilst the issue of DrachenFyre’s ``uselessness`` has been addressed by his bedroom being full of Power Ranger toys and sticky tissues, DrachenFyre has taken it upon himself to think he has a shot, he needs to know the truth. Please review his loserness and decide. Thank you. `

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

21,523,365

` ==Proposal of changing name and structure of this page == I propose to change this page and show in it only reference links to various comparison charts, because it fails to show (as stated in the title): [Quote] The table only includes systems that are widely used and currently available. Due to the large number and variety of available Linux distributions, all of these operating systems are grouped under a single entry in these tables. [End quote] It could have been called ``Comparison table of OSes recent than 5 years``, but it still presents MacOS and not only Mac OS X, that is the current selling version. (For example Windows'95 and windows'98 are both canceled from the table, and only Windows ME is shown. And it is correct. because both 9x versions are discontinued from market longer than 5 years.) OS/2 is discontinued, and IBM plans to release it Open Source, but it is still on the table. Linux OSes are shown apart. Their invoice is no longer (?) necessary. It lacks of OSes still on the market, such as AmigaOS, which recently started also 2 split versions, AROS and MorphOS (and also MorphOS it is currently on the market). [I wrote AmigaOS invoice in the table and I planned to insert MorphOS later]. It lacks of very interesting OSes currently on the market such as RTOS (Real Time Operating Systems), which major representative is QNX. Also it could have been called ``Comparison Table of Operating Systems with a million or larger userbase``, but then, FreeBSD and Solaris are far from reaching this record of installed releases. So I propose to create multiple pages of comparison charts, and this page pointing with respective links to each of them (Historical chart ones, OSes actually on the market, Linux Only, etcetera). But one chart amongst the others must be a very extensive comparison table showing all existing OSes, present and past ones, to be of reference for all readers, and mainly students and scholars. Criticisms and advices are welcome. Insert your Sign and say why, if you agree or refuse to change this page. [Whoops. Sorry. I am Raffaele_Megabyte, and I failed to log, becase I reconnected internet after a brief pause] : In my opinion the tables should list OSes that are widely used. However, use isn't the same as number of installed systems; that number just boosts desktop operating systems out of proportion. If, for example, a Solaris system runs an application server used by 100 users, that would really have to count as 100 users, not just one. A good measure might be how often an OS or services running on an OS are directly or indirectly used by how many users. Or to put it another way, the amount of ``real work`` done using that OS. (Of course this cannot really be measured, only estimated). : Basically I'm all for including OSes like QNX and similar systems, as right now the embedded operating systems are very under-represented. However, if we were to go down that road all the way, then we'd have to start including e.g. Symbian OS or Windows CE, too, and there isn't really much point in comparing e.g. Symbian OS to Solaris. : So if there was to be a split at all, I'd split it by target system type, i.e. server OSes, workstation/desktop OSes, embedded/realtime OSes. With that kind of split, many systems could be clearly assigned to one of the types, instead of having to maintain the same data multiple times. Also, splitting into multiple tables doesn't necessarily mean splitting into multiple articles. For example, it would be possible to simply have one section per target system type. : In either case, I'm very much against doing this kind of change in the ``reorganize first, fix later`` style, since a lot of changes tend to stop after the ``reorganize`` phase and never get around to actually filling in all the new content (E.g. I've seen a fair amount of people who insist that OS xyz has to be in the tables, but then can't actually be bothered to add more than a sketchy version of the ``general information`` data.) : Instead, I suggest you create the reorganized version as a page in your user namespace, and then post a link here for discussion. `

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

21,535,444

` ==reversion undone== No good reasons were given for removing my changes, and both they and I have been falsely described. I am not an academic. Nor do I believe that ``only people with european nonmedical academic doctorates deserve to be called doctor``. The only kind of doctorate is an academic one. Doctorates may be in medicine or any other subject. This is clear from the article, which the reverter appears not to have read properly. As for 'European', there is absolutely no Eurocentrism in the article. The US (a country with about 5% of the world's population) is exceptional in that bachelor's-level degrees in medicine are on paper called 'doctorates'. I left mention of this exception in the article. I believe, however, that it requires some explanation for those who might not be familiar with its exceptionality. So that's three lazy errors already in the reverter's blurb: calling me an academic; saying that I think those who don't hold European doctorates shouldn't be called doctors; saying that I think those who hold medical doctorates shouldn't be called doctorates. Fourth, I left a lot of it as it was. As for 'perspectives', I have no 'perspective' to offer. I was trying to keep to the facts. It is true that there is a history to this article, but this includes for example the mention by one discussant that 'doctor' is used as a noun to denote those with PhDs as well as to denote those who hold bachelor's-level degrees in medicine. That fact was not mentioned in the article itself before my changes. (It might also be mentioned that the use of 'PhD' to describe a person, as in 'John is a PhD' is not encountered in the UK - at least, not in my experience. You would say 'John has got a PhD). My version can doubtless be improved, but this will best be done by those who have read it and considered the merits of the particular changes. People read encyclopedias to learn new facts. Whilst I am not saying that this one should be prescriptive, this does not mean that ignorant beliefs should not be countered. For example, I have met people in the UK who think that medics are 'doctors of medicine' and that people with doctorates are 'doctors' of some other subject, as if the qualifications were on the same level. That they aren't, is a fact, not an opinion. (The exceptional case of the US MD should of course be covered too, and is). `

2,005

false

article

random

train

false

21,539,273

`: Everyone falls short in discussions compared to Tiger, who does have ten majors to Singh's three. Plus, Singh has also only really distinguished himself as being the second best golfer in the world behind Tiger since 2003. I think his age works against him a bit too, he was a late bloomer, and he is 42 now and it's not clear how much longer he's going to be at the top of his game. Popularity is a complex factor and there are always going to be a lot of reasons, not just one reason like he's from a different country. It's certainly possible that Singh gets a bit less attention than he might otherwise because he's not American, but recall when David Duval hit #1 in the world, it's not like he got a huge amount of attention for that. As for the ``Tiger wasn't doing his best`` line, that gets brought up with a lot of other golfers than just Vijay Singh. Re. the Google test, some other golf stars: Mickelson (744,000 hits), Els (349,000), Goosen (251,000), Nicklaus (760,000), Palmer (880,000), Garcia (326,000), Duval (120,000), Faldo (137,000). `

2,005

true

article

random

test

false

21,549,133

`:::``Nominally`` beautifully captures the formalism and bureaucracy involved in both ``invitiations.`` We should retain the word ``invitation`` however, as the Party spent alot of effort achieving those purely formal invitations to hide its shame. `

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

21,549,142

` Bad crap == What bunch of crazies wanted connection to the Force to be mystical instead of genetic? Movies like these shouldn't be mystical! It's about the happenings in a fictional galaxy, not some weird spiritual garbage! The only time it should be spiritual is if it were referencing Christianity, and referencing it correctly at that! :I, for one, am an atheist and don't believe in all that spiritual crap myself. However, I think that mysticism in stories makes them much, well… better. It also enhances the theme. How does it do that? :Scorpionman, what makes you think that a movie should only be spiritual if it references Christianity and not another religion? — I suppose that depends on your point of view. I'm not relativistic, but when it comes to things like science fiction, there's no need for spiritual stuff. ::In fact, I was disappointed when I learned that the Jedi use some mystical substance that can't be measured scientifically. It would make more sense for me if they were just highly-trained concentrated people. - :::The Jedi don't really use the midi-clorians. The midi-clorians just connect them to the Force, and the Force is what the Jedi use. ::::By ``some mystical substance that can't be measured scientifically`` I mean the Force. I'm quite disappointed by its very existence in Star Wars. - I don't really think it needs to reference ANY religion. Science fiction is science fiction! If you think it needs to reference Islam, that's your opinion. :I don't think he ever mentioned Islam. ::I am not sure to whom the anonymous editor was referring (I don't see any reference to Islam either), and I suppose this discussion isn't really relevant here anyway. But for the record, I have no problem with spirituality without reference to a specific or already-existing religion, especially in something like Star Wars where the connection of the ``humans`` to us is obscure (since it takes place during ancient times in a distant galaxy). I was responding to Scorpionman's odd (in my opinion) comment that movies should only be spiritual if they reference Christianity instead of other religions. I personally think it's better to stay away from specific religions. — I really would rather have it not reference spirituality, but my ``weird comment`` stating that it should only reference Christianity is my point of view. I know not everybody agrees, but I really would rather it all be purely technological and scientific. :The Force is a power that can not easily be conceived, my young padawan. We must learn to harness its energies, let it flow through us. Only then can we become one with the Force. Is Yoda really an atheist? :Yes. He worships the Force. Oh. 7 July 2005 11:34 (UTC) ==`

2,005

true

article

blocked

test

false

21,559,365

` ``Strong encrypted F2F networks will mainly use strong symmetric encryption (in particular, the only theoretically secure one-time pad) for every link.`` Who ever wrote this article could do with a brush up on practical cryptography (no..not the book). OTP is pretty unpractical here.`

2,005

false

article

blocked

train

false

21,565,715

` == Your email. == ``The fact that Ryan engages in 'cock foreplay' indicates that he is probably a homosexual.```

2,005

true

user

blocked

test

true

21,585,045

== Passing comment == A wise choice voting to keep the Wikiproject. Integrity is the key to any person's judgement. It's good to know that you can make the right call when something important goes up for deletion.

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

21,591,381

* He insulted me first. To be fair, you should warn him, as well. That's what we call JUSTICE.

2,005

true

user

blocked

test

false

21,593,939

`:If by ``seen in the past`` you mean in a historical time frame, I agree, but I stated it was comparable, we've been warming for more than a century and it is only on the last decade that we have exceeded the temperature a millenia ago, and given the error bars in the temperature proxies even that is uncertain, but the trend is certainly there. It may seem unfair, but the burden of proof is not on the skeptics, they have the easy job, the consensus was correctly criticized for being unable to explain the satellite data and the residual balloon discrepency. Now they are in better agreement, but the discrepencies are still great enough to call into question the range of IPCC predictions. Perhaps the injustice in the burden of proof is compensated by the greater funding and employment on the ``believer`` side. The skeptics can get by with far fewer people and less funding for research. Model the clouds better, model the data better, and couple the ocean better, and better incorporate direct and indirect solar influence and the error bars should go down. Do all that and even if the predictions come in at the high end of the range, the Kyoto treaty may still be completely ill advised and a tremendous waste of human wealth and potential. It just ain't fair! I hope you agree that it is fair to demand better science when hundreds of billions of dollars are being committed on the predictions. This is more than an admittedly interesting academic exercise. `

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

21,597,141

== A request == Perhaps you might be willing to restore the Wikiproject to this version http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Wikipedians_for_Decency&oldid;=21575756? It's been protected due to bad faith edit warring, but it was protected to the wrong version (by accident?) Thanks.

2,005

true

user

blocked

test

false

21,603,257

I added some external links but someone deleted two as too general. Emmerson and melissa from leaky cauldron and mugglenet were specifically invited to interview JKR just after half blood prince was published. She rates them highly and has given her 'best website' award to them. So they are good references for anyone wanting to know more. The two specific links are to the opening page, but anyone linking there could then find out more. There are many pages on each which would be relevant, and also changing, so I do not see the sense in listing all possible pages from the website. Wiki recommend citing sources and places for further information.

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

21,606,229

== Nice rewrites... == ...on Mother Theresa. Keep it up.

2,005

true

user

random

train

false

21,612,709

:::Replied in my own User Talk page, and dropped copyright complaints for your image. (In addition, added reference to your image in the original infringing image, so that people know to use yours instead.)

2,005

true

user

random

dev

false

21,614,493

Why do you make films?

2,005

false

article

blocked

test

false

21,614,786

** had no information on his user page, and it was doubtful he ever would put anything there himself. I see no reason, then, why we should not imagine what this fine gentlement should actually be like. I imagined him as a large black man who served in the coast guard and later went on to own several dry cleaners. Who is to say that is not his true nature? Not you, that is for sure.

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

21,630,790

== Substitution Rapid == Once in a while...Regular Local Buses (Painted Orange) are used on Metro Rapid Service when there is a shortage on red buses.

2,005

false

article

blocked

train

false

21,642,424

u r sooooooooooooo gay

2,005

false

user

blocked

test

true

21,653,454

Well, this chap isn't a sockpuppet of me, and I resent the outrageous accusation. You can enter that into the offical LOG.

2,005

true

user

blocked

test

false

21,661,309

*See discussion with anon about links in question here []

2,005

false

article

blocked

train

false

21,671,588

== Whoops == What!? You blocked me from editting? Damn...oh wait, nevermind, you're just an idiot. p.s. I'm not a person, I'm a reminder.

2,005

false

user

blocked

train

true

21,680,867

==Psychological views== Could someone explain and discuss the psychological views and developments Francis Bacon had and led/added to?

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

21,684,416

` == Fare Thee Weel, My Fine Friend! == I'm back in town for a day and thought I'd drop by again. I took a look at how your RFAr was coming along, as well as your evidence you are marshalling in your ``Sandbox`` at []. I must say I am rather disappointed at the slight nature of said evidence. Not that I'm going to be around, but I'm sure you don't have a very strong hand, as it were. As I've said before, I've already explained the alternate accounts, and users Casito (and Soltak also to a smaller extent) have been just as uncivil to me as I had been to them. Casito basically accused me of being a pedophile/stalker of some kind in his statement to the Arbitration Committee after all. One thing that did seriously concern me and that I'd like to, if you please, elucidate, is that Casito's statement about ``website defacement`` being a ``crime`` in ``many jurisdictions`` is absolutely 100% misleading in our context. First, there are no local jurisdictional issues here, the Internet is regulated at the national level in the U.S. (I'm sure you knew that). Second, like I told Casito, this is a Wiki, any changes on here, no matter how malicious, do not rise to the level of ``defacement,`` which pertains more to secure/static websites (think US Govt homepages for instance). I don't know whether he realised this, but in practical terms what Casito said was misleading on both legal and practical grounds, a bluff if you will. Of course he didn't realise that I could see through his bluff, and when I calmly explained these two above points to him, he got really defensive and quite ``pissy,`` just as I'm sure he would in real life. Just between you and me, he just doesn't seem like a really ``cool kid.`` For you, however, I have the utmost respect, being a liberal arts Professor in the only civilised part of the U.S. as far as I'm concerned. However, you might want to hurry up presenting your evidence, since I'm once again leaving the country at 8:55 am tommorrow and won't be back until next month; and as I said on my user page, I won't be editing on Wikipedia any more after I get back to work and my routine, etc. But take care, don't take any crap from those snotty preppy know-it-all kids you have up there (and how would I know about that hmmmmm????) )!! `

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

21,688,758

the normal style for these talk pages. Did you know you can generate the signature by typing four tildes: ~~~~.)

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

21,690,597

Where does this come from?

2,005

true

article

blocked

test

false

21,694,782

:One page could easily accommodate all episodes. A whole page for this stuff is ridiculous. The guides are poorly written and edited by the way; someone will have to come in and correct typos, etc. Also, the episodes should be numbered, like other television shows. The user should register and log in, by the way, so we can communicate on his or her talk page instead of individual discussion pages.

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

21,695,417

` :Further thoughts: I did a look-up for the Seinfeld show; this show has one page for all episodes. You can use it for a model. If a nine-year-running show, the most talked about and watched in history, can accommodate all episodes in one page, then so can The Fairly OddParents. Remember, this isn't a hobby site for you to collect your private thoughts and feelings on arcane matters. Some of your ``trivia`` items are really reviews of the show. This is not in keeping with Wikipedia. Any opinions about episodes should be deleted. Follow the Seinfeld model and you'll do well. Good luck. `

2,005

true

article

blocked

test

false

21,701,792

To the person who created this page: Thanks for your work getting this article going! It sounds like an interesting film. Please note that there is a really easy way to create internal link within Wikipedia just add two brackets, not one, on either side of the word you want to link. Good luck with future editing.

2,005

true

article

blocked

test

false

21,703,466

Please avoid turning this article into a promotional piece for the show.

2,005

true

article

blocked

test

false

21,714,863

your fucking face. faggots

2,005

true

user

blocked

test

true

21,719,938

:: The project wasn't vandalised. I simply edited the user list to removed 3 members who were considered bad faith.

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

21,720,541

:::The second project, Wikipedians against censorship is a cynical trolling campaign lead by Gorgonzilla, a well know problem user. It would be entirely inappropriate to merge the two.

2,005

true

user

blocked

dev

false

21,726,466

` :Apology accepted and no hard feelings! Regards, 13:58:33, 2005-08-24 (UTC)`

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

21,727,778

That's funny, TDC violates the 3RR, 10 zillion sock puppets come along to help restore his edits, and what do his edits say?? John Kerry is a commie thank god you didn't jump to any conclusions and ban him or anything

2,005

false

user

blocked

train

false

21,728,427

` ==Research== In the summary of a, so called ``edit``, by an anonymous user of whom we all know it's , done on the 24th of August 2005 (couple of times) it's written: (This version is the most reliable version according to any facts, and according to any source!!! All herein is researched. Mario Roering is a twisted insane person and so are his edits!) Besides the fact that he keeps calling me all kinds of names to which I can only comment look in the mirror!, he is talking about some ``research``. Let me tell you here that this alleged research is the research performed by one single man (you guessed: Peter Lee!). I do not know if he really researched it all and is deliberately twisting the truth, but I have done a counter-research, together with a colleague, and came to a whole bunch of different conclusions!!! So far for this by Peter Lee so called ``research`` then... Now, researched or not, this article here is about WGKF, the World Genseiryu Karatedo Federation. Everything written here is their point of view. It is not necessary to start every single sentence with ``according to WGKF...``, since it is already the title of the article, so it must be clear to anybody that this is about them, from them and according to them! Deleting the facts (researched or not) and replacing them with the 'facts' from one single person who claims to have done research, but only brings in HIS point of view, makes the whole article about something that is NOT WGKF, but maybe about Peter Lee, or, just maybe, about GKIF... And of course that is absolutely wrong! That is not what the article is about... Nobody sees people from WGKF changing the story on GKIF, do you?? 14:36:29, 2005-08-24 (UTC)`

2,005

true

article

blocked

test

false

21,728,948

` :Yeah, sorry... Got a little carried away when I saw all the insulting language about me in the other summaries... This guy is really pissing me off sometimes, especially now he is hiding behind all the different ip addresses, in stead of showing what a 'man' he is and use !! BTW, I did write a message on the so-called 'research' on the talk page... 14:46:19, 2005-08-24 (UTC)`

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

21,729,462

Why is PBS used instead of ordinary saline?

2,005

false

article

blocked

dev

false

21,731,125

` ==Chicken-Ryu?== All the ip addresses you used so far, for your (sneaky) vandalist actions and keeping the edit war alive: * * * * * * * * * * * * * (This list is probably not even complete!!) In stead of hiding behind all kinds of different ip addresses, you could at least have the guts and the decency to insult me using your own name!?! Or are you chickin'??? Maybe you can change the name of your style (Genseiryu-Butokukai) into Chicken-Ryu??? Wouldn't even be so bad, since your McDojo is after all called ``Kentucky-Kai``!!! -)) At least I am not afraid to use my own name, especially since I know I have nothing to hide and I am on the right side! P.S.: are you still gonna answer the question above here (Genseiryu-Genseikan)???`

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

true

21,731,718

`:Thank you! Sometimes I do get a little bit carried away however. Not hard to believe regarding all the insults and name slandering I have to endure from this guy ... But, I will try to work as much as possible in a Wikipedia way and listen to all the advice you and JeremyA gave me... `

2,005

true

user

blocked

test

false

21,735,658

:Show some gratitude BITCH )

2,005

true

user

blocked

test

true

21,738,177

Mr Swine has not been blocked yet, absolutely miraculous - surely only a matter of time before he is nobbled -

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

21,738,332

:c'mon BITCH, speak up.

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

true

21,739,682

:As you are a FilePile member (number 3543), you can verify the screenshot by going to FilePile. -

2,005

true

user

blocked

dev

false