rev_id
int64 37.7k
700M
| comment
stringlengths 5
10k
| year
int64 2k
2.02k
| logged_in
bool 2
classes | ns
stringclasses 2
values | sample
stringclasses 2
values | split
stringclasses 3
values | attack
bool 2
classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
31,529,648
|
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Skinwalker#Vegan]. When started to engage in his revisions without consultation, I tried to engage him in reasonable discussion, see ; . But he just ignores it. :Fine. I showed respect, they showed themselves for what they are. :I find it weird in a way that individuals can become so obsessed by something that they obviously do not love but instead want to demean or destroy - and that means you now - and are willing to invest so much time and energy into it. :I could understand it if was a paid employee of the meat industry - he says he has professional scientific interest in animal husbandry. That would just make him a paid publicist. But if he is doing this and attacking you in his own free time, I pity him deeply. 22:34
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,531,646
|
== Response to the lies in your RFC == So what happens when all of your and wikitricks and threats fail? Then what? Are you going to be willing to engage in reasonable discussion? Do you want to discuss this reasonably or merely continue to engage in this sily pantomime? You are wrong about Canaen. I have nothing to do with him. Your personal attack on him is based on lies. Out of decency, you should remove them. And if you are not going to be decent, how will we progress? == Vegan smegma == male penis]] On a more productive note, and frankly, I produce tons of the stuff, I would like to discuss with you the vegan aspects of smegma and whether or not you might consider it suitable for your inclusion. If you are not sure what that means, there is a very good article on the subject here ; , although perhaps we ought consider starting a separate page on vegan smegma and other cruelty free animal products that may be considered by some vegan. From the vegan point of view, it is almost unique, along with sperm, mother's milk and placentas, as being an entirely cruelty free animal product. A rich source of proteins and, indeed, a live food. Since you are so interested in the fullness and accuracy of vegan minutae, we would be happy to discuss your interest in this and offer you a chance to digest our point of view or contribute.
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
31,531,665
|
==United States== Article is MISSING, deleted by one of many anti-american admins here, no doubt
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,536,011
|
*I'll edit slower, now unblock me or I'll report you for abusing admin powers
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,536,259
|
:Why haven't I been unblocked yet?
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
31,537,115
|
==I haven't broken any laws, or said anything wrong== Why was I blocked/? Is there any justifiation for this block??? AT ALL??? Just a rogue admin??????
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
31,540,386
|
*Alright, fine, I acknowledge that I did something wrong, and will not do it again
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,543,282
|
If a reliable source can't be provided it should be removed.
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,543,625
|
: Where is a source (more precisely a independent source) to any of this? This garabage was started by Christopher Ruddy and funded by Richard Mellon Scaife to bring down Clinton. If reliable sources (ie news/journalistic sources) can't be provided this stuff should be removed. This reminds me of the Bush-9/11 conspiracy theories. It's garabage. -GH
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,544,242
|
` == Segements to be removed == The following should be cited with legitmate sources (ie no Moon hoax type websites) or removed: Although it has been maintained that he was killed by a self-inflicted gunshot wound to the head at that site, no bullet fragments were ever found and very little blood was present at the body's final location. While he was located on an incline, the trickle of blood ran contrary to gravity. No explanation was offered to explain this odd phenomenon. No room for made up stuff on this page. As Jerry Falwell said about the Clinton Chronicles (a video he funded and sold): ``To this day I do not know the accuracy of the claims made in The Clinton Chronicles,`` but nevertheless failed to condemn the poor research and false statements. -GH`
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,555,233
|
:Ben wrote: If ID is a wacky, crazy, ridiculous belief held by a tiny minority of lunatics and fanatics—as its critics charge—then why doesn’t it receive the sort of treatment that other wacky beliefs receive? :My reply: The short answer is that advocates of Intelligent Design are currently enjoying some success infiltrating public school cirricula, particularly in red states. Some parents in those areas are likely to consult Wikipedia for information before voting for school board members or otherwise participating in school policy decisions. The team which is critical of ID seems to be loading this purportedly encyclopedic summary down with barrage jamming to influence public policy.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
31,556,112
|
Interesting. Just dig around in Wikipedia and with luck you might be able to find a lot about someone who's vandalizing a page. You can also find the history of anyone who has been mucking about in Wikipedia. I just dug up some interesting background on one of the muckers on the Poppers page. =)
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,557,818
|
== User name == How did you get your user name?? Is it part of a sequence of colors and numbers that continues with Yellow 2, Green 3, etc.??
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
31,559,839
|
` _______________________________________________________________________________ == Headline text == Attention: Sandra [[User:69.11.10.188| When indicating ``passing`` in your statement above, could you please respond to the following questions re:the various registries you have referenced: 1)What do you mean by ``passing``. Do the registries disallow breeding of dogs who have higher than your indicated ratings? How do the registries gather the individual scores of each of their breeding dogs? How do the registries ``enforce`` these requirements? 2) Could you state what testing organization(s)are accepted by each registry for these ``passing`` grades? Your ``grades`` indicate they are probably OFA scores, but how are Penn-Hip scores treated in the registries, since this testing is also being used with Shiloh Shepherds, from what has been previously mentioned in this discussion? 3) What are your references for your gathered information; that is to say, what are the web page addresses for the various registries where this info is stated as required/enforced/recommended? 4) Most importantly, since the term ``required`` calls for a resource by which adherence to this ``requirement`` can be enforced, could you also please provide the resources through which interested puppy buyers can confirm testing results for the individual dogs (or their parentage) they are interested in purchasing. Whether claimed as required or not by whichever registries or breeders, these claims have no value (other than through ``blind trust``) to potential puppy buyers unless they have an opportunity to verify the results themselves through independent means. In other words, if a reader wants to research the hip ``grades`` of the parents of a puppy they are considering buying (not generic group testing results) would you please indicate where that information can be found for each of the registries (NSBR, ISSR, TSSR)? Example: NSBR - Hip registration is primarily through OFA. To view OFA's hip information on NSBR dogs, please view website address www.xxxxxx.org`` AND ISSR - Hip registration is through OFA and Penn-Hip. To view OFA's hip information on ISSR dogs, please view website address www.xxxxxx.org. To view Penn-Hip's hip information on ISSR dogs, please view website address www.zzzzz.org `` AND TSSR - Hip registration is conducted through XXXX, however individual results are provided to prospective and current puppy owners by submitting a Request for Health Results Form, available at www.TSSR.com/Request for Health info. 4)If verification of these requirements for the registries is not published nor can be obtained in writing, would you also please indicate this policy. If you can only provide resource information for a registry you are affiliated with, I would then ask that other discussion participants (i.e. registry members or non-affiliated breeders) provide this information and their policies in answer to my requests above. Thank you very kindly. M.Dùfy __________________________________________________________________________________`
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
31,560,569
|
Welcome! Hello , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: *The five pillars of Wikipedia *How to edit a page *Help pages *Tutorial *How to write a great article *Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
31,561,137
|
==Sorry== Sorry for reverting to a poor version. I try to watch out for that, but every hundred edits, I get too relaxed.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
31,561,176
|
` Regarding the writer at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Hitler_salute Mr Barlow is a nutter with an obsession. The history of the salute is now improved in the Roman salute article (which had many previous visits from Dr. Curry in the past - see its talk page). The pact between the National Socialist German Workers' Party and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics is not well known, and is also not covered widely on Wikipedia, so it is ``covered up`` by people and also people often refer to it as the ``Nazi-Soviet`` pact (as the writer above does) which avoids ever using the actual name of the horrid Party (the National Socialist German Workers' Party) and reinforces the hackneyed use of the shorthand ``Nazi`` and the myth that members of the National Socialist German Workers' Party referred to themselves as ``Nazis`` (they did not refer to themselves as ``Nazis``). Some people (note the writer above) try to evade the point with odd comments such as ``It wasn't invented by Wikipedia editors to conceal the word 'socialism'!`` That comment does not dispute the fact that there are people who use the word ``Nazi`` to avoid ever stating the actual name of the party: The National Socialist German Workers' Party. Not only is that done in the title of the page cited (the Nazi-Soviet pact page) it is done on that entire article where the actual name of the Party never appears nor even the phrase ``National Socialist.`` The writer above also makes constant use of the shorthand ``Nazi`` even when discussing the very topic at hand. The Bellamy salute was not originally the same as the salute of the National Socialist German Workers' Party, as noted by Professor Curry. However, as anyone who looks at Dr. Curry's historic photographs of the salute can see, it developed into the same salute as that of the National Socialist German Workers' Party. Even the writer above concedes Dr. Curry's point that the flag was saluted with a normal military-style salute and then the arm was straightened out toward the flag during the oath. The writer above tellingly evades the point that the use of the military salute led to the change in the salute to the U.S. flag. It is as if the writer above is conceding the point made. Indeed, the writer seems to concede it with the comment ``Anyway, even if the gesture had been the same, so what? It's just a gesture. The Soviets used conventional salutes, does that mean that the US military are Communists because they use the same gesture as the Soviet military!`` It is fascinating how the writer again avoids the actual name ``Union of Soviet Socialist Republics`` and also used the term ``Communist`` instead of using the term ``Socialist.`` The writer then attempts to avoid the issue, which is the origin of the straight-arm salute, and tries to turn the issue into an odd argument about whether the salutes dictated particular dogmas. Nevertheless, the writer evades the topic that Professor Curry has raised, which is that Francis Bellamy and Edward Bellamy were self-proclaimed National Socialists in the USA three decades before the National Socialist German Workers' Party, and Edward's book was an international bestseller, translated into every major language (including German, which Edward spoke and wrote, and where Edward had studied as a young man) and that Edward's dogma inspired ``Nationalism`` clubs worldwide including in Germany. Yes, the ``Roman salute`` page did once contain innaccuracies, and the writer above is to be thanked for conceding that point. But that is no reason for the writer to start going on with his use of the term ``conspiracy.`` It's just what you get when you have an open encyclopedia! The point is to correct error when you see it, and to not delete those corrections when they are made by people like Dr. Curry. The writer above also concedes that he is the Wikipedia editor who ``became wiser``, by incorporating Professor Curry's discoveries. The writer is to be thanked for crediting Dr. Curry with making it more widely available. It should be noted that the valuable information that Professor Curry provides is his own discovery. Dr. Curry has also mentioned that the material about the use of the Roman salute in films derives from an academic article by Martin Winkler. Professor Curry pointed out that Martin Winkler did not realize at the time of Winkler's article that the films were all pre-dated by the use of the salute in the U.S. Pledge of Allegiance. Dr. Curry has also publicly challenged Martin Winkler to debate these issues. Professor Curry's discovery that the swastika/hakenkreuz, although an ancient symbol, was sometimes used by the National Socialist German Workers' Party as ``S`` shapes standing for its ``Socialism`` is also his own original work. And he is right that other writers have deliberately covered up the discovery (as the writer above admits) and have excluded it from the Swastika article. The writer above simply made up his denial and he knows that Dr. Curry is correct and he shows it because he does not dispute a word of it and can give no opposing citations or reference. Even when the writer above claimes ``The real reasons why the Nazis chose the swastika are well documented`` he cannot provide an citation, because he knows that it would either concede (or at least not dispute) Dr. Curry's discoveries.`
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,561,411
|
` == read the truth at http://rexcurry.net/wikipedialies.html == Regarding the writer at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Hitler_salute Mr Barlow is a nutter with an obsession. The history of the salute is now improved in the Roman salute article (which had many previous visits from Dr. Curry in the past - see its talk page). The pact between the National Socialist German Workers' Party and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics is not well known, and is also not covered widely on Wikipedia, so it is ``covered up`` by people and also people often refer to it as the ``Nazi-Soviet`` pact (as the writer above does) which avoids ever using the actual name of the horrid Party (the National Socialist German Workers' Party) and reinforces the hackneyed use of the shorthand ``Nazi`` and the myth that members of the National Socialist German Workers' Party referred to themselves as ``Nazis`` (they did not refer to themselves as ``Nazis``). Some people (note the writer above) try to evade the point with odd comments such as ``It wasn't invented by Wikipedia editors to conceal the word 'socialism'!`` That comment does not dispute the fact that there are people who use the word ``Nazi`` to avoid ever stating the actual name of the party: The National Socialist German Workers' Party. Not only is that done in the title of the page cited (the Nazi-Soviet pact page) it is done on that entire article where the actual name of the Party never appears nor even the phrase ``National Socialist.`` The writer above also makes constant use of the shorthand ``Nazi`` even when discussing the very topic at hand. The Bellamy salute was not originally the same as the salute of the National Socialist German Workers' Party, as noted by Professor Curry. However, as anyone who looks at Dr. Curry's historic photographs of the salute can see, it developed into the same salute as that of the National Socialist German Workers' Party. Even the writer above concedes Dr. Curry's point that the flag was saluted with a normal military-style salute and then the arm was straightened out toward the flag during the oath. The writer above tellingly evades the point that the use of the military salute led to the change in the salute to the U.S. flag. It is as if the writer above is conceding the point made. Indeed, the writer seems to concede it with the comment ``Anyway, even if the gesture had been the same, so what? It's just a gesture. The Soviets used conventional salutes, does that mean that the US military are Communists because they use the same gesture as the Soviet military!`` It is fascinating how the writer again avoids the actual name ``Union of Soviet Socialist Republics`` and also used the term ``Communist`` instead of using the term ``Socialist.`` The writer then attempts to avoid the issue, which is the origin of the straight-arm salute, and tries to turn the issue into an odd argument about whether the salutes dictated particular dogmas. Nevertheless, the writer evades the topic that Professor Curry has raised, which is that Francis Bellamy and Edward Bellamy were self-proclaimed National Socialists in the USA three decades before the National Socialist German Workers' Party, and Edward's book was an international bestseller, translated into every major language (including German, which Edward spoke and wrote, and where Edward had studied as a young man) and that Edward's dogma inspired ``Nationalism`` clubs worldwide including in Germany. Yes, the ``Roman salute`` page did once contain innaccuracies, and the writer above is to be thanked for conceding that point. But that is no reason for the writer to start going on with his use of the term ``conspiracy.`` It's just what you get when you have an open encyclopedia! The point is to correct error when you see it, and to not delete those corrections when they are made by people like Dr. Curry. The writer above also concedes that he is the Wikipedia editor who ``became wiser``, by incorporating Professor Curry's discoveries. The writer is to be thanked for crediting Dr. Curry with making it more widely available. It should be noted that the valuable information that Professor Curry provides is his own discovery. Dr. Curry has also mentioned that the material about the use of the Roman salute in films derives from an academic article by Martin Winkler. Professor Curry pointed out that Martin Winkler did not realize at the time of Winkler's article that the films were all pre-dated by the use of the salute in the U.S. Pledge of Allegiance. Dr. Curry has also publicly challenged Martin Winkler to debate these issues. Professor Curry's discovery that the swastika/hakenkreuz, although an ancient symbol, was sometimes used by the National Socialist German Workers' Party as ``S`` shapes standing for its ``Socialism`` is also his own original work. And he is right that other writers have deliberately covered up the discovery (as the writer above admits) and have excluded it from the Swastika article. The writer above simply made up his denial and he knows that Dr. Curry is correct and he shows it because he does not dispute a word of it and can give no opposing citations or reference. Even when the writer above claimes ``The real reasons why the Nazis chose the swastika are well documented`` he cannot provide an citation, because he knows that it would either concede (or at least not dispute) Dr. Curry's discoveries.`
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,561,445
|
please note the following:
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
31,562,833
|
` == regarding the Gay rights in Iraq article == ``100% POV nonsense, get it out of here`` Care to be more specific? If it's POV, we'd rather make it NPOV than delete it. - `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
31,563,124
|
Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. 2000
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
31,565,849
|
This message is regarding the page Bill Clinton. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. |
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
31,569,081
|
`Based on reports in the media this week, and from comments made by others who have experienced what I went through, it's apparently not uncommon in Wikipedia for a single person to create several different personalities, or ID's, and to then use them themselves, or in concert with others, to create the appearance of unrelated people making edits, challenging posters, harrassing and threatening others, and worse. So, your statment that ``..hmm, no, it was three people.``, rings hollow with some of us. `
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,574,707
|
insecurity issues Dear Travis, I thought this site would be less .... restricting to say the least. I'm sure you're just one of many but let it be known that your best contribution to society and the preservation of our generation's views on what is and isn't important enough to be in an encyclopedia would be to quit working on this site and spend more time on your studies. You were obviously picked on alot as a child and i really do hope that if you are ever given any amount of power in your life it is not over anything nearly as important as this.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,574,867
|
Article definately needs a Story and a Gameplay section.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
31,576,436
|
I have been blocked on the basis of two counts of vandalism. there was no vandalism, all comments were issued for the good of the encyclopedia and were stated explicitly
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
31,576,586
|
. also, i was only warned once, not twice as stated in regulation
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
31,577,107
|
` == How they do it. Revealing how vandals prevent accurate information on Poppers, that they disagree with, from being posted here! == I just figured out what's going on what these guys are doing to those of us who want to edit the poppers page by adding more accurate and meaningful information, but which they do not agree with. If you can find the time, I urge you to go into the ``history`` of the poppers section or page (click on the ``history`` tab at the top of the page), and then go to the bottom of that page. There you can click on the largest number, and essentially see ALL the history of this page from the day it was created! I just spent time looking at it, and a clear pattern emerges. To be kind, there are some pranksters among us. More realistically, and at worse, they are vandals. Some of them appear to be working in concert with each other to make arbritary changes to the edits of people they don't agree with. They literally and very quickly 'revert' the versions back and forth among their own versions, all the while essentially vandalizing the credible information that more knowledgeable people have posted. Then, when the unsuspecting editors realize something's going on, that their edits are being deleted almost within minutes of their having posted them, and when they try to figure out how best to react and deal with the problem, as they begin the inevitable complaining and asking of questions, they are harrassed and threaten with having their accounts 'blocked'; or they're falsely accused of violating various rules of Wikipedia, upon which they are often then threatened with even more sanctions against them. It is precisely this kind of unethical, irresponsible and despicable behavior that was exposed in the world wide media earlier this week. Had I not seen the news reports which described exactly this kind of activity being rampant on Wikipedia, I would most likely have never figured out what was going on. `
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,577,599
|
Good god, you wiped out my post just now. You can't even speak in coherent sentences. Bascially, you've been busted.
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
31,583,286
|
` :::Wow. Good point! `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
31,592,878
|
==Bucoviana== People from Bucovina speak Romanian. There is no dialect or grai in Romanian Language. It is only a very little accent. that is all! a true Moldavian.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,593,271
|
==Protest== The article about jews and progrom from Iasi page must go to holocaust and not on that page!
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,594,714
|
:Good idea...see ya around!
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
31,594,838
|
==Exagerari== jidane iti permiti sa spui prea multe rahaturi despre Romania si sa faci multe exagerari! Du-te in Palestina! Ptr asta ti-am facut un stat acolo, nu ca sa umbli cu porcarii jidanesti!!!
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
31,596,102
|
` Question for Dominick: You removed a link to two screen captures of EWTN's ``Ask an Expert`` Q&A.; The screen captures in question are of Fr. Levis saying that the Novus Ordo Missae is a ``complete fabrication,`` followed by an edited version of that answer. I would like to see proof of this ``denial.`` Seattle Catholic linked to the ``complete fabrication`` post with a link entitled ``EWTN Expert on the Novus Ordo Mass.`` Traditio.com and Novus Ordo Watch (two sedevacantist outfits) also linked to it. But most importantly, I ``reported`` on it before any of them because I 'saw the Q&A; posts both of them, the original ``complete fabrication`` post and the edited version with my own eyes at EWTN's website. One of those screen captures at the link you deleted is my own; the other was taken by someone else. If EWTN is ``denying`` this, then some serious liars work for them. So: did EWTN lie on top of editing Fr. Levis's post? `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
31,597,626
|
:You are the king. I hereby name you Peter 'Awesome' McGinley.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
31,613,923
|
:Hi, I think the easiest way is to look at a page's history, and then press the 'time/day/month' link to the left of the last good version of the article, then you will get to edit that old version. Then just press submit, and it will 'update' the vandalized page to the old version again.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
31,618,708
|
:Most if not all of Burroughs' worlds and lost lands were in fact mapped, both by him and others, and a good portion of these maps are available on the web. There are Wikipedia articles on Barsoom, Jetan (Martian chess), and Pellucidar (which includes Burrough's earlies map of a portion of that venue). -, 12/16/05.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
31,622,519
|
== Operation Wisła == The source was given on the article's talk page and is added to references, I can also try finding another one, but I'm not sure it will solve the problem. The problem with the anon user is much bigger. She (the anon uses femail gender writing in Polish) has some personal problem with Ukrainians and tries to either add biased information to the article, or remove the information which she doesn't like. She also had with me a very heated discussion on my talk page leaving many comments offending to Ukrainians. She vandalised my user page twice. It seems that the anon uses the same IP number in evenings 217.96.248.99, but the IP numbers (starting with 83) used during working hours change every day. I'll ask admins for blocking at least the 217 one. I do not want to ask for protection of the article, because many people work on it now, and it would prevent the article from developing. Thanks for help! |
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
31,624,227
|
` == More on Wiki writers http://rexcurry.net/wikipedia-lies.html == Many errors have been corrected in Wikipedia's Roman salute article. http://rexcurry.net/wikipedialies.html The article had many visits from Dr. Curry in the past - see its talk page- as Dr. Curry attempted to correct the many errors. http://rexcurry.net/wikipedia-lies.html However, the wikipedia article on the ``Roman Salute`` is becoming more dishonest by the week. An earlier version referenced the work of Professor Rex Curry and started thusly: ``The Roman salute is a gesture in which the arm is held out forward straight, with palms down. Sometimes the arm is raised upward at an angle, sometimes it is held out parallel to the ground. The salute was supposed to have been used in the Roman republic, but there is no clear evidence of this. Indeed it is not known whether salutes in the military sense existed at all in Roman culture`` (by Paul Barlow). A more recent version of the same article is written as if a neo-Nazi has been covering-up again. A big initial problem is that no wiki writer will even attempt to discover the first use of the phrase ``Roman salute`` and thus the writers remain stuck in intellectually dishonest confusion about dates and origins. The article reverts back to its earlier opening concessions to the work of Dr. Curry, conceding that there is no clear evidence of the salute in the Roman Republic and also conceding that there is no evidence of salutes in the military sense at all in Roman culture. The wiki writer then engages in speculation that people today misunderstood some images from ancient Rome. There is no support for the idea that the ``Roman Salute`` concept arose long ago from misinterpretations of Roman images. There is as much evidence that, after Dr. Curry's shocking discoveries about the salute's origin with the Pledge of Allegiance, modern writers (including wiki writers) deliberately looked for other explanations and then those writers misinterpreted Roman images in order to cover-up and suppress Professor Curry's discoveries. The wiki writer then engages in speculation that neoclassical artists misunderstood some images from ancient Rome. There is no support for the idea that the ``Roman Salute`` concept arose among neoclassical artists from misinterpretations of Roman images. There is as much evidence that, after Dr. Curry's shocking discoveries about the salute's origin with the Pledge of Allegiance, modern writers (including wiki writers) deliberately looked for other explanations and then those writers seized upon neoclassical artists in order to cover-up and suppress Professor Curry's discoveries. For example, there is no evidence that Jacques-Louis David actually thought that his painting ``The Oath of the Horatii`` represented an actual historical Roman salute. All of the evidence indicates that David created the scene out of whole cloth for drama. All of the speculating otherwise is actually the machinations of wiki writers and people of their ilk. The intellectual dishonesty is all the more evident in that the wiki writers deliberately faill to address those very points already made by Dr. Curry http://rexcurry.net/pledgehoratii.html Further, the Horatii painting depicts three people reaching for weapons. The Tennis Court Oath was painted by David later, and repeats David's use of the dramatic gesture that David concocted, but in a more modern setting. There is no evidence that it accurately depicts the event protrayed. David was not there. Further, the oath was was written on paper (the paper being read by the central figure?) and the ``oath was taken`` by signing the document. There is no evidence that anyone is taking an oath in the painting (the central figure might be swearing, or he might be reading his document) while those people about him waive hats, talk, holler, point, etc. Three figures on the left seem to be an inside reference to the Horatii painting. The wiki writer is misrepresenting the works or reading into them. The distribution of the Eagle Standards was painted by David even later, and repeats David's use of the dramatic gesture that David concocted, but in another modern setting. There is no evidence that it accurately depicts the event protrayed and there is no evidence that anyone is taking an oath in the painting at all. The wiki writer claims that this is the mos important of these paintings. That painting shows no use of the salute in pledging or oath-taking or at all and simply shows various people, with various gestures, acclaiming the central figure and grabbing for, and shouting for, the ``Eagle Standards.`` The wiki writer is misrepresenting the works and reading into them. The wiki writer then claims that other painters during the nineteenth century regularly depicted the straight-arm gesture in scenes of Roman imperial history. The writer cites no support because there is no support. There is no support for the idea that the ``Roman Salute`` concept arose among neoclassical artists from misinterpretations of Roman images. There is as much evidence that, after Dr. Curry's shocking discoveries about the salute's origin with the Pledge of Allegiance, modern writers (including wiki writers) deliberately looked for other explanations and then those writers misrepresented neoclassical art to cover-up Professor Curry's discoveries. The cover-up is also supported by the fact that wiki writers know (or should know) that Francis Bellamy explained the origin of his salute and that it had nothing to do with imitating any painting, nor imitating any ``Roman`` salute myth. At this paragraph the intellectual dishonesty doubles. The writer is attempting to imply that there is a relationship between the original Pledge salute and the myth of the ``Roman salute.`` No support is cited because there is no support. The writer is not honest enough to clearly state that the supposed Roman myth was not an influence upon Francis Bellamy or Bellamy's cohorts. The writer will not reference Dr. Curry's clear explanation of how the Pledge salute was selected by Bellamy and Bellamy's cohorts, which is known because Bellamy explained its creation. The writer knows that it does not support the myth that the writer is trying to perpetuate. The writer will not mention Professor Curry's voluminous dissection of Bellamy's love of the military and the Bellamy term ``military socialism.`` The writer is still covering-up for socialism. The writer is also completely evading the fact that the use of the military salute in the Pledge evolved into the classic hard stylized Nazi salute. The writer is evading the fact that the Nazi salute is an extended military salute, via the Pledge of Allegiance. All of those are discoveries by Professor Curry. It is unclear because the writer has knowingly refused to acknowledge Dr. Curry's discovery that the use of the military salute by Bellamy, caused the extended arm salute to change in use. Wikipedia articles are so intellectually dishonest that they are comical. It had nothing to do with the ``Roman salute`` myth, but the writer cannot bear to give up his distortions. The Wikipedia writer implies that the Olympic salute came from a classical painting, but the wiki writer knows that he has no support to cite. The wiki writer is aware of Dr. Curry's voluminous and ground-breaking work exposing the Olympic salute but the writer is too intellectually dishonest to even mention it. http://rexcurry.net/bookchapter1a1c.html The writer evades Professor Curry's explanation that the Olympic salute also derived ultimately from the Pledge of Allegiance. The wiki writer references how Dr. Curry exposed the work of Martin Winkler regarding the use of the Roman salute in films. http://rexcurry.net/pledgesalute.html Professor Curry pointed out that Martin Winkler did not realize at the time of Winkler's article that the films were all pre-dated by the use of the salute in the U.S. Pledge of Allegiance. Martin Winkler, while discussing the old films, was unaware that the salute had been the original salute of the Pledge of Allegiance. Dr. Curry long ago challenged Martin Winkler to debate these issues in public and Dr. Curry has maintained that standing debate challenge, which has been met with complete silence. http://rexcurry.net/pledge-professor-martin-winkler.html The wiki writer adopts Martin Winkler's intellectually dishonest use of the term ``fascist`` to further aid the wiki writer in covering-up for the National Socialist German Workers' Party and for the National Socialism of the Bellamys. The wiki writer also mentions a chest variation of the salute but the writer is too intellectually dishonest to mention Dr. Curry's photographs and explanation that the same variation was used earlier in the Pledge of Allegiance to the U.S. flag. Franklin Delano Roosevelt did not institute the hand-over-the-heart, and the writer acknowledges the error in the next sentence when referencing the act by Congress. The writer fails to mention that through most of Roosevelt's time in office the straight arm salute was used and Professor Curry possesses photographic examples of Roosevelt himself being saluted with the notorious salute. It is interesting to note that Congress did not inject itself into the mess until after the U.S. entered World War II, December 7, 1941. The article uses four (or more) forms of the word ``Nazi`` and never gives the actual correct name of the horrid party: the National Socialist German Workers' Party. It is a classic example of the usual cover-up for socialism, and the cover-up of the philosophical relationship between the Ge
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,624,866
|
` :::::Their claims are unworthy of further investigation. Encyclopedias are about truth, not about the delusions of obsessed Jew-haters. ``Obstructing research`` what research? ``Discrediting their merit`` what merit? What historical truths have deniers uncovered? What illumination have they brought to the darkness of the Third Reich? Pfui. `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,625,508
|
` *Nope, it doesn't. But nobody described Trans-Jordan as a ``Palestinian state``, so Wikipedia doesn't get to either. `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,626,949
|
:I hate doing that, but it really is beginning to look like it. Let's give it another try, on GE's talk page.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
31,629,565
|
` == regarding a wiki writer == Regarding the writer at http://rexcurry.net/wikipedialies.html and referenced at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Hitler_salute please note the following: Mr. Barlow is a nutter with an obsession. The history of the salute is now improved in the Roman salute article (which had many previous visits from Dr. Curry in the past - see its talk page- as Dr. Curry attempted to correct the many errors). The pact between the National Socialist German Workers' Party and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics is not well known, and is also not covered widely on Wikipedia, so it is ``covered up`` by people, and those people also often refer to it as the ``Nazi-Soviet`` pact (as the writer above does) which avoids ever using the actual name of the horrid Party (the National Socialist German Workers' Party) and reinforces the hackneyed use of the shorthand ``Nazi`` and the myth that members of the National Socialist German Workers' Party referred to themselves as ``Nazis`` (they did not refer to themselves as ``Nazis``). Some people (note the writer above) try to evade the point with odd comments such as ``It wasn't invented by Wikipedia editors to conceal the word 'socialism'!`` That comment does not dispute the fact that there are people who use the word ``Nazi`` to avoid ever stating the actual name of the party: The National Socialist German Workers' Party. Not only is that done in the title of the page cited (the “Nazi-Soviet pact” page) it is done on that entire article where the actual name of the Party never appears nor even the phrase ``National Socialist.`` The writer above also makes constant use of the shorthand ``Nazi`` even when discussing the very topic at hand. The Bellamy salute was not originally the same as the salute of the National Socialist German Workers' Party, as noted by Professor Curry. However, as anyone who looks at Dr. Curry's historic photographs of the salute can see, it developed into the same salute as that of the National Socialist German Workers' Party. Even the writer above concedes Dr. Curry's point that the flag was saluted with a normal military-style salute and then the arm was straightened out toward the flag during the oath. The writer above tellingly evades the point that the use of the military salute led to the change in the salute to the U.S. flag. It is as if the writer above is conceding the point made by Professor Curry. Indeed, the writer seems to concede it with the comment ``Anyway, even if the gesture had been the same, so what? It's just a gesture. The Soviets used conventional salutes, does that mean that the US military are Communists because they use the same gesture as the Soviet military!`` It is fascinating how the writer again avoids the actual name ``Union of Soviet Socialist Republics`` and also uses the term ``Communist`` instead of using the term ``Socialist.`` The writer then attempts to avoid the issue, which is the origin of the straight-arm salute, and tries to turn the issue into an odd argument about whether salutes dictate particular dogmas. Nevertheless, the writer evades the topic that Professor Curry has raised, which is that Francis Bellamy and Edward Bellamy were self-proclaimed National Socialists in the USA three decades before the National Socialist German Workers' Party, and Edward's book was an international bestseller, translated into every major language (including German, which Edward spoke and wrote, and where Edward had studied as a young man) and that Edward's dogma inspired ``Nationalism`` clubs worldwide including in Germany. Yes, the ``Roman salute`` page did once contain inaccuracies, and the writer above is to be thanked for conceding that point. But that is no reason for the writer to blabber with his use of the term ``conspiracy.`` It's just what you get when you have an open encyclopedia! The point is to correct error when you see it, and to not delete those corrections when they are made by people like Dr. Curry. The John Seigenthaler story from Brian Chase is another notorious example of Wikipedia’s untrustworthiness. On Wikipedia, the intellectually dishonest administrators block people who tell the truth, so it is specious to say that truth-tellers simply need to correct the articles. The writer above also concedes that he is the Wikipedia editor who ``became wiser``, by incorporating Professor Curry's discoveries. The writer is to be thanked for crediting Dr. Curry with making it more widely available. It should be noted that the valuable information that Professor Curry provides is his own discovery. Dr. Curry has also mentioned that the material about the use of the Roman salute in films derives from an academic article by Martin Winkler. Professor Curry pointed out that Martin Winkler did not realize at the time of Winkler's article that the films were all pre-dated by the use of the salute in the U.S. Pledge of Allegiance. Dr. Curry has also publicly challenged Martin Winkler to debate these issues. Professor Curry's discovery that the swastika/hakenkreuz, although an ancient symbol, was sometimes used by the National Socialist German Workers' Party as ``S`` shapes standing for its ``Socialism`` is also his own original work. And he is right that other writers have deliberately covered up the discovery (as the writer above admits) and have excluded it from the Swastika article. The writer above simply made up his denial and he knows that Dr. Curry is correct and he shows it because he does not dispute a word of it and can give no opposing citations or reference. Even when the writer above claimes ``The real reasons why the Nazis chose the swastika are well documented`` he cannot provide an citation, because he knows that it would either concede (or at least not dispute) Dr. Curry's discoveries.`
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,631,411
|
:don't remove my comments from my talk page cock, and mind your own business. is a hypocrite for removing my comments from his talk page, and then not letting me remove comments from my talk page. i will NOT stand for that, and he will PAY Anus
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
31,633,037
|
:i will heed your request only if you likewise warn . i will give you one hour to do so. Anus
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
31,633,060
|
non-mammal and highly carnivorous.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,634,469
|
As you can all see, the user DickClarkMises has made numerous comments regarding me. I will not insult him here because I do not want to be kicked off of Wikipedia. Please just know that I see things very differently from him. Again, my name is Sean Christopher Marinara and I am a college student at Holy Cross. Dr. Block used to teach here, and I learned about him through that. My friends and I are all libertarians. We have personal information about Dr. Block that we learned from his former colleagues here at Holy Cross. When I tried to post this information, some users, including DickClark, deleted it. The information is 100% true. I ask that you please carefully consider the situation before making any decisions which might be considered rash.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,635,703
|
` == Headline text == Questions and comments Ms. Barber wrote: ``In a united effort, the ISSR Licensed Breeders only produce approximately 200 pups per year`` ''''' Ms. Barber-How many of those puppies were ``produced`` by your kennel? What specific health testing do you conduct on your dogs? You, and those supporting your club/registry, have been respectfully asked for this information numerous times during this discussion yet you continue to ignore these legitimate requests, while appearing rude, insulting, superior-minded, and frankly an entirely offensive and inarticulate representative of this breed you ``founded`` and the other breeders affiliated with your registry. I certainly hope other breeders affiliated with your organization do not present themselves to the public in the same way you do, as I can't imagine anyone with any intelligence and self-esteem would be willing to tolerate such unprofessional behavior, much less purchase any puppies/dogs from people who conduct themselves the way you have in this discussion. You claim a lot, but you provide no independent support for your claims, only your own writings on your own website. You claim anyone ``producing`` dogs other than you or your registry are frauds, yet you are unwilling to prove how this is true other than offering some photos YOU have taken of these dogs and your own rantings, as evidence. You claim breeders unaffiliated with you are ``in it for the money``, yet you ignore the fact that: You produce more of these dogs than almost all other breeders combined, through your wholly and co-owned breeding dogs. Your website (http://www.newzionshilohs.org/upcoming_litters.htm) for this Winter alone, shows you are ``producing`` ELEVEN litters at New Zion and through co-ownership breedings. Eleven litters, even conservatively speaking, could easily produce over 100 PUPPIES! And, you are planning for 20 more litters next Spring and Summer! You also currently list over 25 stud dogs and over 25 females you are considering for breeding! You charge a lot of money for each puppy you produce ($900-$2500+)and you contractually reserve the right, at your own discretion, to substitute a puppy from a buyer's desired litter to another compatible (again, based on your own determination) litter AFTER the buyer has submitted payment to you. (see: http://www.newzionshilohs.org/Policies_N_Prices.htm.....``New Zion reserves the right to substitute any litter of equal/higher value that is compatible with your exact requirements``) You require your puppy-buyers to not only pay you for puppies at the time of purchase, but you also require them to sign contracts promising future puppy and breeding rights, in order to profit from the dog not only now but also throughout his/her life. You have no stated policy on your website page (http://www.newzionshilohs.org/Policies_N_Prices.htm) re: your own commitment to rescue and make/find a home for for any of the puppies/dogs you ``produce``, should they become unwanted, homeless and/or end up in shelters or abusive situations. Your ``Policies and Prices`` make no mention of a contractual requirement or even a suggestion by you (with the signed contractual commitment of your puppy-buyers) to spay/neuter their new ``pets``, in order to reduce overpopulation of this breed and dogs, in general. I could find nowhere on your website where the horrifying statistics of unwanted/euthanzied dogs in the U.S. (2 million +, including 25% of which are purebred dogs) is responsibly addressed by someone actively promoting and engaged in the proliferation of this explosion. Your website does not list any references, such as recommending/governing affiliations (i.e. Better Business Bureau), approval ratings (i.e. OFA, Penn-Hip, CERF), or other professional organizations to which you belong (ie. American Dog Owner's Association, the the Delta Society [therapy], dog training or agility organizations, etc.), only your own dog club(SSDCA), you own dog registry (ISSR), your own literature (except some very limited information by Dr. Padgett and numerous and righteous religious and biblical quotations). You are the ``Chairman`` of the board of directors for your registry's dog club, the SSDCA (which charges for membership and participation in club activities). There is also no arbitration committee available within this organization to negotiate/override any challenges to your decisions. You control the ISSR dog registry, which charges puppy owners/breeders numerous fees for numerous types of registration papers and other background information, not to mention also deciding if/when/where/how any breeders in your registry are allowed to breed their dogs. There is also no arbitration committee available within this organization to negotiate/override
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,637,496
|
:I know I shouldn't, guess I have a conditioned knee-jerk response to his ilk. Have you checked out his contribution history? He seems to have a very odd definition of what's NPOV and what belongs on Wikipedia in general, not just for Spurlock. -
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
31,637,780
|
` Bullying? Would threatening to commit a crime against the author constitute ``bullying``? As I've pointed out numerous times, Zarove threatened to publish Acharyas credit information online if I didn't back off. Procuring someones credit report under false pretenses is a crime. Furthermore, this suggests Zarove has Acharyas SSN. The mentally ill person who kidnapped her child is known to have passed Acharyas personal information, such as her SSN, to fringe religious groups like tektonics.org. He is wanted by the authorities. Zarove, have you been in touch with this psychotic kidnapper? `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,638,062
|
` In the article: ``a convert``: meaning a convert away from Judaism, I presume, but I don't presume strongly enough to edit it myself. | `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
31,638,522
|
` == Headline text == Questions and comments Ms. Barber wrote: ``In a united effort, the ISSR Licensed Breeders only produce approximately 200 pups per year`` ''''' Ms. Barber-How many of those puppies were ``produced`` by your kennel? What specific health testing do you conduct on your dogs? You, and those supporting your club/registry, have been respectfully asked for this information numerous times during this discussion yet you continue to ignore these legitimate requests, while appearing rude, insulting, superior-minded, and frankly an entirely offensive and inarticulate representative of this breed you ``founded`` and the other breeders affiliated with your registry. I certainly hope other breeders affiliated with your organization do not present themselves to the public in the same way you do, as I can't imagine anyone with any intelligence and self-esteem would be willing to tolerate such unprofessional behavior, much less purchase any puppies/dogs from people who conduct themselves the way you have in this discussion. You claim a lot, but you provide no independent support for your claims, only your own writings on your own website. You claim anyone ``producing`` dogs other than you or your registry are frauds, yet you are unwilling to prove how this is true other than offering some photos YOU have taken of these dogs and your own rantings, as evidence. You claim breeders unaffiliated with you are ``in it for the money``, yet: You produce more of these dogs than almost all other breeders combined, through your wholly and co-owned breeding dogs. Your website (http://www.newzionshilohs.org/upcoming_litters.htm) for this Winter alone, shows you are ``producing`` ELEVEN litters at New Zion and through co-ownership breedings. Eleven litters, even conservatively speaking, could easily produce over 100 PUPPIES! And, you are planning for 20 more litters next Spring and Summer! You also currently list over 25 stud dogs and over 25 females you are considering for breeding! You charge a lot of money for each puppy you produce ($900-$2500+). After the puppy-buyer has paid you for a puppy from a certain litter, you also contractually reserve the right, at your own discretion, to substitute a puppy from another ``compatible`` (again, based on your own determination) litter and you will not provide a refund if they are do not agree with the ``substitute`` puppy you decide to offer them. (see: http://www.newzionshilohs.org/Policies_N_Prices.htm.....``New Zion reserves the right to substitute any litter of equal/higher value that is compatible with your exact requirements``). It appears that, once monies are given are given to you, your contract does not allow for any refund under any circumstances, nor could I find any instances where you contractually assume any financial responsibility whatsoever for any puppies you ``produce`` who display congenital/hereditary problems requiring resulting astronomical/extensive veterinary fees. You require your puppy-buyers to not only pay you for puppies at the time you ``produce`` them, but you also require puppy-buyers to sign contracts promising future puppy and breeding rights (for breedable dogs, you require the dog's new owners to either give you some of the puppies that dog produces in the future and/or you require they allow you to use that dog in the future to sire new litters of your own), in order to profit from the dog not only now but also throughout his/her life. You have no stated policy on your website page (http://www.newzionshilohs.org/Policies_N_Prices.htm) re: your own personal policy/commitment to rescue and make/find a home for for any of the puppies/dogs you ``produce``, should they become unwanted, homeless and/or end up in shelters or in abusive situations. Your ``Policies and Prices`` make no mention of a contractual requirement by you (with the signed contractual commitment of your puppy-buyers) to spay/neuter their new ``pets``, in order to reduce overpopulation of this breed and dogs, in general. I could find nowhere on your website where the horrifying statistics of unwanted/euthanzied dogs in the U.S. (2 million +, including 25% of which are purebred dogs) is responsibly addressed by someone actively promoting and engaged in the proliferation of this explosion. Your website does not list any independent references, such as recommending/governing affiliations (i.e. Better Business Bureau), approval ratings (i.e. OFA, Penn-Hip, CERF), or other professional organizations to which you belong (ie. American Dog Owner's Association, the the Delta Society [therapy], dog training or agility organizations, etc.), only your own dog club(SSDCA), you own dog registry (ISSR), and your own literature (except some very limited information by Dr. Padgett and numerous and ri
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
31,640,880
|
: wtf? you are now just as bad as fcytravis. WHY NOT WARN HIM!? Anus
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
31,641,334
|
Quit hounding me, Dominick.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,642,013
|
` *Sorry about not alerting you or anything, but in the current situation and my concensus, it should be obvious. I'm speculating that when you inserted the wikibook templates into the articles, you didn't use the preview button did you..? When you simply when in, and (apparently) disregarded the text's conformity, you should have noticed that sticking the template up top forces the character sprites, pictures, and sometimes contents link meshes the text and in a appaling manner that renders the nearby text unreadable. Concerning your query and concensus regarding people noticing the project, I'm sure it won't impede that, they just need to look at the bottom, and the wikibook link, being a well, link, belongs in the ``external links`` section anyway. -| `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
31,644,391
|
`::Well, I wouldn't call it a ``dispute``. Zarove, while on wikipedia, threatened to commit a crime against the author unless I backed off. It's a fact. How is that usually dealt with? I would think such behaviour would be taken seriously. `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
31,645,783
|
Waz up ya'll the yearrr iz almost over!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
31,646,599
|
Formally not, de facto yes. And in the end, it is a title we are arguing about - show some aesthetic sense.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
31,647,025
|
` ____________________________________________________________________________ == Headline text == Questions and comments Ms. Barber wrote: ``In a united effort, the ISSR Licensed Breeders only produce approximately 200 pups per year`` ''''' Ms. Barber-How many of those puppies were ``produced`` by your kennel? What specific health testing do you conduct on your dogs? You, and those supporting your club/registry, have been respectfully asked for this information numerous times during this discussion yet you continue to ignore these legitimate requests, while appearing rude, insulting, superior-minded, and frankly an entirely offensive and inarticulate representative of this breed you ``founded`` and the other breeders affiliated with your registry. I certainly hope other breeders affiliated with your organization do not present themselves to the public in the same way you do, as I can't imagine anyone with any intelligence and self-esteem would be willing to tolerate such unprofessional behavior, much less purchase any puppies/dogs from people who conduct themselves the way you have in this discussion. You claim a lot, but you provide no independent support for your claims, only your own writings on your own website. You claim anyone ``producing`` dogs other than you or your registry are frauds, yet you are unwilling to prove how this is true other than offering some photos YOU have taken of these dogs and your own rantings, as evidence. You claim breeders unaffiliated with you are ``in it for the money``, yet: You produce more of these dogs than almost all other breeders combined, through your wholly and co-owned breeding dogs. Your website (http://www.newzionshilohs.org/upcoming_litters.htm) for this Winter alone, shows you are ``producing`` ELEVEN litters at New Zion and through co-ownership breedings. Eleven litters, even conservatively speaking, could easily produce over 100 PUPPIES! And, you are planning for 20 more litters next Spring and Summer! You also currently list over 25 stud dogs and over 25 females you are considering for breeding! You charge a lot of money for each puppy you produce ($900-$2500+). After the puppy-buyer has paid you for a puppy from a certain litter, you also contractually reserve the right, at your own discretion, to substitute a puppy from another ``compatible`` (again, based on your own determination) litter and you will not provide a refund if they are do not agree with the ``substitute`` puppy you decide to offer them. (see: http://www.newzionshilohs.org/Policies_N_Prices.htm.....``New Zion reserves the right to substitute any litter of equal/higher value that is compatible with your exact requirements``). It appears that, once monies are given are given to you, your contract does not allow for any refund under any circumstances, nor could I find any instances where you contractually assume any financial responsibility whatsoever for any puppies you ``produce`` who display congenital/hereditary problems requiring resulting astronomical/extensive veterinary fees. You require your puppy-buyers to not only pay you for puppies at the time you ``produce`` them, but you also require puppy-buyers to sign contracts promising future puppy and breeding rights (for breedable dogs, you require the dog's new owners to either give you some of the puppies that dog produces in the future and/or you require they allow you to use that dog in the future to sire new litters of your own), in order to profit from the dog not only now but also throughout his/her life. You have no stated policy on your website page (http://www.newzionshilohs.org/Policies_N_Prices.htm) re: your own personal policy/commitment to rescue and make/find a home for for any of the puppies/dogs you ``produce``, should they become unwanted, homeless and/or end up in shelters or in abusive situations. Your ``Policies and Prices`` make no mention of a contractual requirement by you (with the signed contractual commitment of your puppy-buyers) to spay/neuter their new ``pets``, in order to reduce overpopulation of this breed and dogs, in general. I could find nowhere on your website where the horrifying statistics of unwanted/euthanzied dogs in the U.S. (2 million +, including 25% of which are purebred dogs) is responsibly addressed by someone actively promoting and engaged in the proliferation of this explosion. Your website does not list any independent references, such as recommending/governing affiliations (i.e. Better Business Bureau), approval ratings (i.e. OFA, Penn-Hip, CERF), or other professional organizations to which you belong (ie. American Dog Owner's Association, the the Delta Society [therapy], dog training or agility organizations, etc.), only your own dog club(SSDCA), you own dog registry (ISSR), and your own
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,649,262
|
== Damnit == why not be fair?
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,656,649
|
For the story behind the slanderous accusations from Dominick and JG of Borg regarding the EWTN screen shots, see this page and, especially, the associated discussion page (half way down)
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,657,267
|
He has blue eyes and pale skin and this has never occured from two full bkac parents.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
31,658,462
|
Pathoschild, is this RfC stuff supposed to go on forever or what? How does it end? (Oh, God, will it ever end?)
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,658,820
|
` == Discounting Mcfly's vote == Sorry, but no, his oppose vote does count. He himself is not a sockpuppet and has ample edits. Unless he's blocked, he can vote. e `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
31,661,724
|
` ::I don't think you need to spend much time working on this article to make it ``clear`` that he is Cuban. I mean, being born in Havana, Cuba takes care of that issue. Maybe inputting more information on his biography would be more beneficial to improve the article. It is still a stub. `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
31,662,529
|
`Yeah, it's real civil to call me a liar, to call EWTN liars, to call everything I do ``spamming`` or to write links to my site off as ``monographs`` (do you know what a monograph is?), etc. I've broken no rules, so leave me alone. `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,663,681
|
I don't think that the iPod fits the definition of a fad. Just because it is popular and it is a fashion accessory, does not make it a fad.
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,664,668
|
Llama Llies Very cute, the addition to the llama page. I hate to tell you, most editors probably won't have the sense of humor I have as a common layman. I know, from too much experience, how hard they take things. If you're new to Wikipedia, I can be of no help whatsoever, but if you want to know how far you can push it with stuff like that, I'm at my user page: .
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
31,669,090
|
I'm a 9 year old girl and I LOVE it.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
31,674,928
|
Which you made after I was encouraged by a mediator and an admin to make one against you.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
31,680,684
|
==Reference== The DEX confirms the Fenris-like figure, which is one version of the vârcolac in Romanian folklore. Other versions are in the manner of the Strigoi, werewolf, etc. About its identity to the Slavic versions or not, well, this needs to be further verified. Though folkore figures in common between Vlachs and neighboring Slavic peoples are rarely completely identical. I added a fact template for one sentence.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
31,685,701
|
Hey, pile on! It's the thing to do.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,686,706
|
***So provide some examples.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
31,687,182
|
:Hi Bernard, :I answered you on your talk page. My edit was a vandalism reversion 58 minutes before you inserted your link, and your link was removed by an anonymous user from AOL. Thanks for your understanding,
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
31,691,162
|
` *``Echo Bay`` is correct it was the name of Pierre Omidyar's consulting company, for no particular reason he just liked the way it sounded. (eBay was originally AuctionWeb, but someone else had dibs on the name.) `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
31,697,405
|
== WritersCramp == Hello, I have returned from a long vacation and I have found I have been included in an RfC of WritersCramp, and am called a sockpuppet. I would like to say now that I am not, and I will do whatever it takes to clear my name. I don't know how to prove it, but I am not him. All I did was agree with his beliefs, I never saw him before on wikipedia, until I reverted the vandalism on his page. I read his views and agreed, if that was wrong I apologize. I will not bring my personal views into wikipedia, if you please remove me from being a sockpuppet, and me being involved in that RfC. I never meant to do anything wrong.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
31,702,075
|
== Sockpuppet == I would like you to tell everyone I'm not a sockpuppet of you, just to make sure everyone is clear.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,703,507
|
Deliver me, O Lord, from the evil man: rescue me from the unjust man. Who have devised iniquities in their hearts: all the day long they designed battles. They have sharpened their tongues like a serpent: the venom of saps is under their lips. Keep me, O Lord, from the hand of the wicked: and from unjust men deliver me. Who have proposed to supplant my steps. The proud have hidden a net for me. And they have stretched out cords for a snare: they have laid for me a stumblingblock by the wayside. I said to the Lord: Thou art my God: hear, O Lord, the voice of my supplication. O Lord, Lord, the strength of my salvation: thou hast overshadowed my head in the day of battle. Give me not up, O Lord, from my desire to the wicked: they have plotted against me; do not thou forsake me, lest they should triumph. The head of them compassing me about: the labour of their lips shall overwhelm them. Burning coals shall fall upon them; thou wilt cast them down into the fire: in miseries they shall not be able to stand. A man full of tongue shall not be established in the earth: evil shall catch the unjust man unto destruction. I know that the Lord will do justice to the needy, and will revenge the poor. But as for the just, they shall give glory to thy name: and the upright shall dwell with thy countenance. I have cried to the, O Lord, hear me: hearken to my voice, when I cry to thee. Let my prayer be directed as incense in thy sight; the lifting up of my hands, as evening sacrifice. Set a watch, O Lord, before my mouth: and a door round about my lips. Incline not my heart to evil words; to make excuses in sins. With men that work iniquity: and I will not communicate with the choicest of them. The just shall correct me in mercy, and shall reprove me: but let not the oil of the sinner fatten my head. For my prayer also shall still be against the things with which they are well pleased: Their judges falling upon the rock have been swallowed up. They shall hear my words, for they have prevailed: As when the thickness of the earth is broken up upon the ground: Our bones are scattered by the side of hell. But o to thee, O Lord, Lord, are my eyes: in thee have I put my trust, take not away my soul. Keep me from the snare, which they have laid for me, and from the stumblingblocks of them that work iniquity. The wicked shall fall in his net: I am alone until I pass. Hear, O Lord, my prayer: give ear to my supplication in thy truth: hear me in thy justice. And enter not into judgment with thy servant: for in thy sight no man living shall be justified. For the enemy hath persecuted my soul: he hath brought down my life to the earth. He hath made me to dwell in darkness as those that have been dead of old: And my spirit is in anguish within me: my heart within me is troubled. I remembered the days of old, I meditated on all thy works: I meditated upon the works of thy hands. I stretched forth my hands to thee: my soul is as earth without water unto thee. Hear me speedily, O Lord: my spirit hath fainted away. Turn not away thy face from me, lest I be like unto them that go down into the pit. Cause me to hear thy mercy in the morning; for in thee have I hoped. Make the way known to me, wherein I should walk: for I have lifted up my soul to thee. Deliver me from my enemies, O Lord, to thee have I fled: Teach me to do thy will, for thou art my God. Thy good spirit shall lead me into the right land: For thy name's sake, O Lord, thou wilt quicken me in thy justice. Thou wilt bring my soul out of trouble: And in thy mercy thou wilt destroy my enemies. And thou wilt cut off all them that afflict my soul: for I am thy servant. Blessed be the Lord my God, who teacheth my hands to fight, and my fingers to war. My mercy, and my refuge: my support, and my deliverer: My protector, and I have hoped in him: who subdueth my people under me. Lord, what is man, that thou art made known to him? or the son of man, that thou makest account of him? Man is like to vanity: his days pass away like a shadow. Lord, bow down thy heavens and descend: touch the mountains and they shall smoke. Send forth lightning, and thou shalt scatter them: shoot out thy arrows, and thou shalt trouble them. Put forth thy hand from on high, take me out, and deliver me from many waters: from the hand of strange children: Whose mouth hath spoken vanity: and their right hand is the right hand of iniquity. To thee, O God, I will sing a new canticle: on the psaltery and an instrument of ten strings I will sing praises to thee. Who givest salvation to kings: who hast redeemed thy servant David from the malicious sword: Deliver me, And rescue me out of the hand of strange children; whose mouth hath spoken vanity: and their right hand is the right hand of iniquity: Whose sons are as new plants in their youth: Their daughters decked out, adorned round about after the similitude of a temple: Their storehouses full, flowing out of this into that. Their sheep fruitful in young, abounding in their goings forth: Their oxen fat. There is no breach of wall, nor passage, nor crying out in their streets. They have called the people happy, that hath these things: but happy is that people whose God is the Lord.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,709,338
|
== Once Moore == Thanks for deleting, and i am sorry for creating it. I was duped by a fake mandy site. And am i a sockpuppet?
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
31,717,826
|
==jews and Iasi== during the iasi history many things happened. It was burned several times by turks, russian, but says nothing about that. Iasi is not a jewish city so take your jewish shit and place it in Palestina. We made a country for jews so do not bother us. jews are aggressive people and very dangerous. You should write about the holocaust of jews against Palestinians!!! I am sure that in future there will be museums of holocaust made by jews against Palestinians!
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,719,541
|
Antonescu was up set with jews because his wife, a jewish woman, did not make him good meals.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
31,732,484
|
` * How much longer do I have to point it out for you to acknowledge that there is a serious problem on that page and with that person and some others on it?! ``(cur) (last) Deeptrivia (→Origins of the symbols - Al Khwarizmi is NOT Arab, Iranians will be disgusted)````(cur) (last) Deeptrivia (→Spread of the numeral system to the West - Iranians will consider it an insult to call an Aryan arab)`` When did it become acceptable in epistemological terms to reason, paraphrasing, Einstein is NOT German, Germans/Aryans will be disgusted and consider it an insult to call a jew German``. Talk:Hindu-Arabic_numerals#Deeptrivia.2C_Al-Khwarizmi_was_an_Arab How much longer do I have to see verifiable content based on reliable and scientific sources that mentioned the Arab contribution to the numeral system removed because it didn't support their biased, distorting and offensive views? Talk:History_of_the_Hindu-Arabic_numeral_system#Deeptrivia.2C_why_did_you_remove_this_verifiable_content.3F.21 Talk:Hindu-Arabic_numerals#I_find_serious_fault_with_this_phrasing ()`
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
31,732,598
|
How should I title this?!
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,740,337
|
== Congratulations == Your harassment and persecution of has caused far more damage and far more widespread damage to Wikipedia than her highly localized abrasiveness aver could have. You make me sick to my stomach, whoever you are and whatever your motivations might be. You have caused an odious stench which will be impossible to erase. People have previously suggested that you do some real editing here rather than pursuing your campaign of ugliness; I disagree; I don't see how someone with your sensitivities, or lack thereof, could have any value to Wikipedia (or, for that matter, to the planet) at all.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,742,800
|
*It would be a very good idea for you to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
31,743,174
|
17 December 2005 (UTC)
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
31,746,438
|
*Actions speak louder than words. His actions have been despicable.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,747,401
|
Like said up above, please familiarize yourself as soon as possible with Wikipedia's non-negotiable neutral point of view policy. Your personal observations and opinions are irrelevant. Also, do not edit other editors' User pages (such as mine); please use the User talk pages for that.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,749,180
|
*OK, you've been advised. The next time you edit a user page other than your own, it will be treated as vandalism and you will be blocked.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
31,769,812
|
== News & General Links == I propose that we remove the news links (primarily written by journalists or online bloggers) and include them below the more comprehensive links on both sides of the issue. If the news is about new research, we can include that in the article and cite the research.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
31,769,857
|
Let's examine another important question, while we are at it. Why would an adult ages 26 and up, want to be with someone between the ages 12-17? There is not much the two could have in common being at 2 completely differing stages in life. Emotionaly also the are in different places. Physicly the younger one often isn't fully developed. What is the atraction and where does it come from?
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
31,774,730
|
== immortal technique == hey, would you please stop adding nonsense to the I.T. article, thanks
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
31,777,514
|
His name is Darren Jordon, not Jordan!
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
31,780,774
|
` ==:Image:Funnelsmall.jpg has been listed for deletion== {| align=center border=0 cellpadding=4 cellspacing=4 style=``background-color: #E1F1DE`` |- | An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Funnelsmall.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. |}`
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
31,781,321
|
` :Well, people are looking for Scottish Clans when they come to this article. If it's done neatly, and in a more tidy manner, then go ahead, I guess. As long as the information is readily available. `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,785,978
|
` :::So, is ``List of circulating currencies`` okay? I understand zntrip's point, but I don't think ``official currencies`` works either for the list or the category because obsolete currencies are also official, just not active/circulating. We could use active and obsolete for the categories. I'm still partial to ``circulating`` even if it's not perfect, but whatever everyone else wants is fine with me. `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
31,790,565
|
` : I understand why you think otherwise (and I doubt what I say will change your mind), but the ``A=A`` userbox was just a general joke that only went on your userpage because you have a shitload of them and I wondered how long it would take you to notice another one; it was not done with any specific malice towards you. `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
31,795,868
|
*Fair enough. I should have put the same comments on the RfAr instead, where they belonged.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
31,795,934
|
== Blocking me == Good call.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.