dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
45,874,453	This page claims that the mean temp of earth is 287 K, yet the highest is 331 k, the lowest 184 K, and (331+184)/2= 257 K! Is this a mistake?	2,006	false	article	blocked	dev	false
45,879,467	` ===Update=== I've replaced the dispute tag to better reflect the dispute here. If there is more than just one single source, A good compromise would be to include a range of numbers as oppose to revert warring to include a single source. But the sources would still have to be reliable. I'll check the sources when I get the chance and propose a reliable range. Until then it would be very nice if people stop reverting things. The totallydisputed tag is there and people would probably read the talk page before believing the numbers. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
45,882,385	` ==Article no longer just a list== This article has grown and is no longer just a list. Would other editors support a move of the article name to ``Religious affiliations of United States Presidents`` (my preference), or ``United States President's religious affiliations``? `	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
45,887,051	` ==Vanity articles== Please don't create articles about yourself or your friends. We're building an encyclopedia here, and it's very unlikely that your article fits in with that. Creating such articles also makes work for others as we rush to delete them. The Wikipedia policy on vanity articles can be reviewed here and here and the reason your article was deleted can be reviewed here. If you have any questions or need any help, please . Thanks.➨ `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
45,887,300	Exactly. The treatment I have received from Phil Welch, an individual who is on an obvious power trip and abusing his administrative resources for personal gain, is nothing short of outlandish and embarassing to Wikipedia. I have consistently been a strong contributor to numerous articles and it is somewhat demoralizing to have been blocked from editing a page of which I was one of the primary creators of. This behaviour on Phil Welch's part strikes me as being ridiculously hypocritical.	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
45,887,634	` :This is definitely unacceptable. What he did was definitely trolling the way I understand it (inducing angry comments). That whole section is titled ``Aucaman's behavior`` asking me to ``review WP:CIVIL`` without giving any explanations as to what I've done wrong. If this is not trolling then what is? I'm not sure why you're doing this. I just spent 30 minutes writing a response to your previous warning and now I'm blocked without even getting a response? His provocative statement is okay, but me (rightly) calling it trolling is not? `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
45,890,055	== Brontosaurus == Why is the Brontosaurus featured in this film? The brontosaurus didn't exist; its skeleton was the result of the bones of two different dinosaurs being fused together. Peter Jackson should have known better.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
45,895,262	::I'd love a picture, but that one is copyrighted. -	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
45,897,116	Well, it seems we can't come to an agreement. This will probably go on until someone gives in. I give in, I don't care anymore. You probably won't hear from me often in this discussion. Go ahead InShaneee, you are the admin, we can't stop you. Let me just remind you though: The customer is always right.	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
45,904,966	~How about a list of different states' ages of consent?	2,006	false	article	random	train	false
45,908,564	Um... I didn't know I messed up your sig. Please just calm down. And please don't block me for asking you to calm down.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
45,932,245	== Image Explosion == I normally like images, but I think that, for once, I have found an article with too many images. I'm going to cut a few out the are irrelevant or repetitive and also move a few around.	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
45,947,416	Hey Beback: I wouldn't call it enmity, it is a search for Jerry Brown's truth.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
45,951,577	{{unblock)) Im sorry, I was just erasing what i thought was wrong, i may have been a bit irratic in my deletion, this is probably due to my Bi-polar and Tourttes, I get can get a bit tempremental when on a low with my bi-polar.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
45,952,519	== I don't understand. == I was only adding stuff about Jason. Why are you mean to me now ( == ===	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
45,952,540	IVE GOT TOURETTS AND BI-POLAR!!!!! IM MAD!!	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
45,952,849	` ::Why is guy even posting on my talk page? And how come I haven't been given a respose in more than 8 hours? This is a clear case of censorship without any explanation and I'll deal with it once I'm unblocked. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
45,958,711	Reverted it. thanks guys	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
45,959,437	I think Eurasia is a much better term. Cheers	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
45,963,283	==Gay icon== I was wondering why she is considered a gay icon.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
45,971,922	` ::Thanks for the comment. I think has made this a little too personal and I'm not even sure why. This is part of a broader content dispute and he has made some statements that can only be interpreted as taking sides due to clear misunderstandings (the users initiating that page are not Iranians, but, on the contrary, are minority groups - so he's reading the whole thing completely backward). I'm not sure what I might have done to deserve this, but he tried to warn me against attacking the same user before but I did not think of it as an attack and gave a full explanation as to why. No matter what happens here I'm going to be filing an RfC demanding an investigation into this. It looks to me like this user has a history of blocking people for unnecessary reasons. Like I said this is unacceptable. I called that person a troll because he was indeed using provocative language (pointing me out by name and then asking me to ``review WP:CIVIL`` for making an edit he doesn't like), and I did not threaten him with a block - I was referring to his block on Iranian peoples for violating 3RR. This is unacceptable. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
45,972,736	I'm the one who should be complaining about this, but instead I'm blocked? I'm not sure how else I should have responded to this user without condemning some of the stuff he'd said. How should I get more people to take a look at this and comment?	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
45,982,023	do what I don't understand ???	2,006	false	article	random	train	false
45,984,406	== I volunteer == Hello. I saw your project and would like to volunteer. You can Wiki email me for more details on my background. God Bless!	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
45,985,421	Eat shit you fucking arse rapping jew fucking arab. I'LL KILL YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	true
45,992,374	== Split This Article! == This article really should be split into several different articles. It's far too long and several topics deserve their own articles anyway, such as Illegal Immigration in the United States and perhaps an even more specific one covering the whole Mexican Immigration issue.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
45,996,308	Firrhill High School, Firrhill High School, FIRE FIRE, FIRE FIRE, mississippi pudding, mississippi pudding, ding dang dong ding dang dong	2,006	false	article	blocked	dev	false
45,997,463	I put the things together. Just like u wanted.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
45,998,061	`:::OK, sorry, I didn't bother to check the page history. I didn't say that you are a moron and a troll, my intention wasn't to attack you in any means. But as I said, if that did (and it didn't) mean this discussion you would've been. • `	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
45,998,757	I fucked your dad last night you fucking whore assed cunt.	2,006	false	user	blocked	dev	true
45,999,232	Allow your face. Just seen it on your user section. You are the ugliest thing i have ever seen in my intire life. Why don't you just end it all. Do us all a favour.	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	true
45,999,751	Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore.	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	true
46,003,928	:Agreed. While Tamers had a different art style, Savers' style is much different from the past four seasons. I'm getting pretty excited D	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
46,004,414	` ::I didn't ask for your opinion on this. The block is definitely unjustified and I'll deal with it when I'm unblocked. You yourself have made lots of far more outrageous comments, repeatedly calling me ``anti-Iranian`` for no reason whatsoever. Your comments here can also be considered harassment. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
46,019,171	Please note that this is the ip address of a public high school, if you must block, only block the edit ability.	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
46,019,802	==Very US-centric== Almost every paragraph starts with discussion about the US, then mentions other countries as vague points of comparison. It would be nice if it could be more balanced. If this wasn't the main page, someone should probably put this template on it:	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
46,020,007	==Criticisms== That page has no substantiated claims and has unverifiable information which is forbidden to have on Wikipedia. No claims have ever been made about Starforce having to be removed via formatting the partition it is installed on because it can be removed via the official removal tool.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
46,020,310	That section has no substantiated claims and has unverifiable information which is forbidden to have on Wikipedia. No claims have ever been made about Starforce having to be removed via formatting the partition it is installed on because it can be removed via the official removal tool. Therefore I am putting the warning back up.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
46,020,875	:Eek! I've removed it from ITN already. \|	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
46,020,912	` I've added a citation for Epicurus being the originator of the ``Problem of Evil``. There's probably a better one available somewhere, but this one will do for now. Not sure whether you were looking for a cite for the theory as a whole or not. I don't see a lot of mainstream media discussion of the ``alternate ending`` theory (except for maybe this article in The Oregon Herald, a publication with which I am unfamiliar), but there's plenty of discussion of it in online sources (reviewers and blogs/message boards): , , , , , , , , , , etc. As such, it's not original research, but it'd be nice to have a firm print citation if someone can find one. - `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
46,038,228	== vandalism . . . == fuck you, waggers.	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	true
46,052,309	don't thumbnail it, insert it like this, 1999 eclipse]]	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
46,054,086	== Glaswegians == I'm a proud Glaswegian, but you may have a point that these localised references are not obvious and would be better put as information on more obviously named categories. Trouble is, you've stepped on a hotbed of Scottish feeling. If you want to persue this, I'd suggest you open a centralised discusion on 'people from cities naming conventions', and cite examples from various countries and continents. You'll get a better debate that way.	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
46,058,478	` :::::::If i may be so bold, i really would respectfully suggest your review WP:CIVIL if you are going to continue on your copyedit role. Leaving multiple edit summary's of ``whatever`` is disrespectful to say the least, and calling other people's good faith efforts ``garbage`` and ``uninformative`` is really disheartening when they have clearly put quite a lot of effort into it, irrespective of the ``quality`` of their effort. I'm sure you do good work in copyediting article - however in alienating other editors you may not be helping the cause as much as you could. The article may be better in some ways, but it also weaker in others (the character list completely lacks content), since you are not willing to discuss and justify your edits, then i trust you will not dispute some minor reverts? `	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
46,063,987	== 3RR == has violated 3RR on Ann Coulter. Please see.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
46,071,250	I agree, leave the links alone already. But InShaneee is not going to give in, trust me. MoLi Admin	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
46,078,850	:::Sounds neat, and makes me sorry I only went for the regular release when I bought it. -	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
46,079,945	== i dont care == i dont fucking care if you have reported me!!! i will start a new account. see if i care. your still a fucking asshole!!!	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	true
46,080,407	== i am not blocked == i just got another warning. why are you such a dick? dogblue	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	true
46,080,763	== ok == i am NOT trying to piss you off ,but dont you find that touching another women is slightly disgusting. with all due respect, dogblue	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
46,080,888	wait, have you reported be so that i am blocked? dogblue	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
46,081,290	` :::Google Scholar turned up a hit for this 42-page paper by a gentleman named Ian Kirk, who's apparently a professor at Goldsmiths College. According to his personal website, it was written while he was pursuing his masters' degree, but there's no publication information listed. It discusses, among other things, the ambiguity of the ending. Is that worth adding as a cite? - Also, I found a citation for the deleted dream sequence in Google book search. It's on pages 111 and 112 of the book ``Who Wrote That Movie: Screenwriting in Review: 2000-2002`` by Chris C Wehner (ISBN 0595292690). - `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
46,085,055	:One would assume. Perhaps the person that wrote that passage was confused. -	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
46,092,112	== Khojaly Page == Dear Marshall B, Look at the Kojaly page. It is filled with Azeri prop and bias to the limit, how can we unite and counter this? Hetoum	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
46,098,085	== Discussion Pages == Don't edit articles and ask people to 'see discussion page' if you're unwilling to participate in discussions. As things stand, there's agreement on the Ann Coulter page aside from you, and you're not participating in discussions.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
46,098,444	Can someone please help me?? I was wondering what the theme for That Was Then, This Is Now. Is. Thanks, Nancy	2,006	false	article	random	dev	false
46,110,497	`== Matt Cutts and the National Security Agency == Matt Cutts had his resume posted at http://www.cs.unc.edu/~cutts in 2002. I have a copy. It says, ``January 1992-August 1994 Department of Defense, 9800 Savage Road, Ft. George G. Meade, MD 20755-6000. Co-operative education student. Completed four work tours (over a year total) with the National Security Agency. During my first tour I produced a sizable report on UNIX security which resulted in a $500 Special Performance Cash Award. On other tours I worked on natural language processing tools, telecommunications, and hardware design of an encryption chip.`` I said on my site that he has a Top Secret clearance. In 2006, Matt Cutts pointed out that his clearance has expired. I changed my references to past tense once I learned of his comment. It remains true that he HAD a Top Secret clearance. You don't work on encryption chips at the NSA unless you have a security clearance. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
46,112,379	== ITPA == Hi Dwaipayanc. The ITPA article is looking decent. I didn't know anything about it at all, so I could hardly add any info off hand. If there are different ITPAs, then maybe it would make sense to work it out in a way similar to Indian Institutes of Technology one main article, containing an overview, and then sub-articles for separate ITPAs. I'd recommend sub-articles only if there is sufficient to write moderately sized articles about those individual ITPAs. Otherwise, a single article covering all of them will be a better idea. These were some random comments. I don't think they were of a lot of help, but if there's any specific way I could be of help, let me know. Regards,	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
46,116,922	`This is a distortion. I agree that a separate article on Mr. Chase was not justified; I said so in the press last December. But while I played a role in identifying Mr. Chase, it was the New York Times and John Seigenthaler, Sr. who had more influence than I when it came to getting his name into print. And as I recall, Mr. Seigenthaler had a ``private word`` with you about how he might identify the vandal, and you gave him a song and dance about how Wikipedia is helpless (and by implication, blameless) in these matters. You didn't try very hard to help Mr. Seigenthaler. I tried a little bit harder than you. And now you slam me for violating this ``poor fellow's`` privacy. Mr. Wales, you owe me an apology. :`	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
46,118,842	Wow, never expected a rude response such as this. Is this how every member of wikipedia treats good natured questions (which I guess falls under the category of research)? Thanks for the correction, but that was uncalled for. Now another question - has there been any attempt to gauge the size of the internet?	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
46,126,360	` ==Princeton History and Supporting Data== I made this point previously but I think it got buried in the sea of discussions surrounding it...So here's my second attempt: The article reads, While at Princeton Theological Seminary, Dembski was involved in forming a group known as the ``Charles Hodge Society``, ostensibly a group concerned with resurrecting positive evaluations of Old Princeton Theology. The Society organized discussions and informal colloquia, but its primary work centered on reviving Hodge's own journal, the Princeton Theological Review. The PTR (over control of which name the society and the seminary wrangled) received funding from conservative Presbyterian backers (the Presbyterian Lay Committee), and primarily wrote from a conservative angle on theological issues of the day. Perhaps the most volatile of these issues was the PC(USA)'s consideration of the ordination of gays/lesbians, in which writers of the PTR (including Dembski) disagreed with Seminary faculty and their writings in nearly slanderous terms. All of which is to say Dembski welcomed controversy and political theological struggles, and was becoming increasingly familiar with the deep pockets of ostracized conservatives in the Church. To me this seems like an awful lot of historical data without any supporting evidence. It reads like someone who witnessed it giving a personal report. Without cites, it sounds like original research, no? I am not questioning the historical acuracy, rather I am suggesting some cites or some sort of supporting evidence would be in order. Anyone else have an opinion? `	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
46,127,501	== Argentine clean-ups == Thanks mate! Sorry about zi mistakes, mainly about the past/present thing. The Spanish articles are all written in present, and I forget to change them to past simetimes. /	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
46,128,145	:: A cruiser is a type of battleship, you know.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
46,133,925	== Sony Vegas == Good work on the Sony Vegas article - looks quite slick now. /	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
46,136,643	Sorry dude, but that's just the way the Wikipedia is set up. Either go with the flow, or find somewhere else to make your own world, with your own customs to follow.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
46,139,291	I think your attitudes are that of intentional Naivety according to Ignoratio elenchi. I'm upset because this is more or less the second time within a couple of hours I've dealt with it.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
46,140,797	== Apologies == I apologise for this vandalism. The reason for this is that the first two or three clusters of the above IP address is a school, ranging from 11 to 18 year olds. So, you can expect vandalism from 82.198.250 and/or 82.198. I'm not entirely sure about IP addresses and what one denotes the entire school however. Is there a way to tell the entire community about this problem? We're only talking about a single computer here; is there a way to talk about the first three clusters here? Again, apologies on behalf of St. Edward's School in Essex, UK.	2,006	false	user	blocked	dev	false
46,141,241	I didn't do anything, what is this all about...	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
46,141,750	I've already explained to you: I didn't change policy, I merely wrote it down. Your assertion that removing the POV tag was vandalism is at best dodgy. 3RR clearly states that 3RR is not an entitlement... etc etc. Just don't get close to it and you're safe.	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
46,144,630	Would Lancaster's daughter most certainly quarter as such?	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
46,148,639	I don't find your sketch. I agree that this article has huge problems. The biggest is deciding what it's trying to be. I'm inclined at the moment to think it should be about the philosophical side of the question of abiogenesis - Aristotle said it was a self-evident truth, then Pasteur showed it wasn't, but he simultaneously showed that Darwin must be be wrong on theoretical grounds. Kelvin drew attention to a second theoretical obstacle to Darwin, the 2nd law. Miller and Urey (drawing on Oparin and Haldane) then demonstrated that the 2nd law is not an obstacle to the spontaneous emergence of complex from less complex systems. But I'm not sure where to go from there. Some mention should be made of information theory, which is simply a restatement of the 2nd law. I agree that the critics section should go - it's peurile. Not go to any other article, just go. Panspermia in this article I'm not sure about - it's an argument about the details of where life mayn have originated, not whether it could originate spontaneously from non-living matter, which is what I currently see this article as being about. Interesting that Kelvin believed in panspermia, as a possibility. Funny man, Kelvin - no great scientist has ever been so wrong so often. About Pasteur, I think we need to keep this article simple; the nuances of Pouchet et al should be kept for some other article. (Or am I oversimplifying this article?) I'm leaving Wiki now, won't be back, so up to you to do as you wish.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
46,155,784	` ::I agree. Not yet. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
46,156,477	==Angry pirate== I provided the link to the Savage column as evidence of non-notability, not evidence of notability, so I'm glad we agree. -	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
46,159,167	== Nothing about illegals? == So Bushie boy is the only one with problems? This asshole is sparkley clean? Fuck Wikipedia!	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	true
46,161,196	` ::The book is written by Khomeini and the title is in the back of ``Jews of Islam``. The term najis is usually used in this context to refer to unclean things. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
46,163,576	` ::::Like I said, the comments were made by Khomeini, not anyone else - so they belong here. You can go ahead and add anything you want to any Rabbi's article. In fact if you read some israeli politician's pages you would find a lot of controversial sayings included. As a leader of a country, and especially as a religious figure, it's important to know Khomenini's views on non-Muslims. This is the only thing I've found so far. You can find other things and add them in if you want. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
46,164,469	` If you want to add stuff about uncleanliness you can create a new section and add them in. This section has been created to include Khomeini's views on non-Muslims. There's a lot more material to come and I'd probably create a new article about this. Until then we would have a section. All this should be pretty reasonable. The only objectionable thing is that the section is not neutral enough, but then again you can add positive stuff - and I will too. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
46,164,644	I already did. It should be deleted.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
46,165,301	== You are wrong == You are wrong in my opposition to Joturner's RfA. I do NOT oppose him because he believes something I do not, as you incorrectly stated, I oppose him because of the fear I have that, based on his zealous userpage regarding his religion, that he will NOT be able to maintain a NPOV. I am Catholic, pretty devout, and I would oppose a fellow Catholic if he/she too was overzealous in their POV. That said, I have the RIGHT as a sentinent life form to have my own opinion and that is something that the liberal left and the conservative right can NEVER take away from me, so don't even try.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
46,166,767	== Let's talk about sex! == You know you want it...If you don't leave well enough alone. You're obsessed with my thingy.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	true
46,168,760	== The Gay Guy == I know you. Wuzzup? I like sadomasochism. Gimme more!	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	true
46,169,398	All external links are supposed to follow Wikipedia:Manual of Style. Direct linking is the appropriate resort. You are plainly taking sides to attack my person, because you don't like me as a person dbiv. Go away and shut up. Stop readding that guy's sexual innuendos to my talk page and grow up.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
46,169,750	== Cease and desist == You must refrain from re-adding vile language to my talk page from hostile editors. To not follow my request, is to indulge the trollish remarks. If you delete this too, then you are effectively one-sided and bigoted. Please leave me alone and don't take sides. Don't vandalise my talk page with nasty comments. I ask nicely.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
46,170,737	**It would definately be in the rail atlas or trackmap as a marked location of an ex-platform, it lists staff halts!	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
46,176,315	` == ``What's a ballsy?`` == She really can't be that stupid....can she???`	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	true
46,180,550	Wow, that's like six-million times better than the stub I put together. Nice work, guys. -	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
46,183,761	My mind must be completely in the gutter. I am thinking about using some photo manipulation to add tougue to Jefferson's portrait and then take the photo with 18-month-old Kira, the with her legs splayed as she balances herself while she is sitting and... Oh no! That would just be too cruel. But it would be very, very funny also! (Remember Jimbo, it is only a movie...) Do you see Sam? You and I know that Jefferson and Kira are two valid living human beings and I am just using the power of suggestion to remind people of my presence, despite their attempts to obliterate me. The ghost in the machine...	2,006	false	user	blocked	dev	false
46,185,754	And to make it more delicious (pun intended), the girls have recently been fended off this user . I could not write this pseudo-real-life stuff as fiction if I had a mountain of heroin to help me! Real life is soooo much fun!	2,006	false	user	blocked	dev	false
46,195,578	` == Help me identify a vandal == On your RfA page, I see that you are interested in blocking vandals. On that same page on March 17, you forgot to log in once and corrected yourself. Your IP address from this mistake was revealed to be 69.182.48.34. On March 28, someone from that IP address added a note on User_talk:69.182.48.34 saying that it ``is registered to Canterbury High School (Connecticut) and is shared by multiple users.`` The note was added because this address was guilty of previous vandalisms. This information is confirmed by a dnsstuff.com lookup. Canterbury High School is a private boarding school with about 220 students boarding there. My problem is this: on February 12, someone from that IP address entered the new email address for Wikipedia-Watch.org on numerous ecommerce lists, so that the box would be flooded with spam. I believe that if this person was not you, then you at least know who did it. Out of 220 students, how many hang out on Wikipedia? I'm asking you to identify this vandal. What this vandal did is technically a felony. As far as I know, Wikimedia Foundation does not condone felonies. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
46,206,702	`And please note, incidentally how that pattern fits particularly well with that sentence of ``Vedanta westernized`` ... However, the spirit that had presided over the birth of this organisation [Brahma-Samaj] did not confine itself to this one appearance, for similar attempts were set on foot as opportunity offered, though generally with no better success... (R. Guenon, Introduction to the study of Hindu doctrines, p. 233). `	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
46,213,031	You have a good knowledge regarding Middle East.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
46,213,772	` Your edit was important. It is true that I do not see and know negative parts of all things. Your edits are great! + `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
46,215,290	== lame == You fuckin queer. Don't you have anything better to do than to monitor wikipedia? Go poop-stain your dick.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	true
46,220,870	== Go away == Go spread your Croatian Fascist Catholic propaganda on the Croatian Wikipedia. Here: Not Wanted! The world is fed up with genodical criminal Croats!	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	true
46,220,891	Note that the user zzzzz has removed lots of articles from the GA list, without providing valid reasons.	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
46,235,701	` **I shouldn't have said that I had blocked ``per your block``; that coud be read as a shifting of responsibilities. I have blocked , and as new and disruptive sockpuppets, per Wikipedia:Blocking policy; specifically: ``New accounts may be blocked for any length of time or permanently, and Sockpuppets that were created to violate Wikipedia policy should be blocked permanently.`` `	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
46,236,633	I don't know if this helps anyone but I thought I would mention that the reverse arrows display as boxes in MSN Explorer 9.2	2,006	false	article	random	train	false
46,239,756	== Lucian Bute == Hey, nice work on Lucian Bute on the Romanian wikipedia. You can always add stuff like stats and career highlights on the English article as well. Thanks for taking interest in my article and one of the best young prospects in boxing ! -	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
46,243,056	this was never confirmed by her. Sometime	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
46,244,078	guys, who cares?! Get a life, it's just an article on the internet thats banter for everyone looking at it. You'd be making a tonne of people happy if you just left it. I'm not really bothered about deleting the notices, vandalism my arse you're vandalising it by trying to remove it	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false

45,874,453

This page claims that the mean temp of earth is 287 K, yet the highest is 331 k, the lowest 184 K, and (331+184)/2= 257 K! Is this a mistake?

2,006

false

article

blocked

dev

false

45,879,467

` ===Update=== I've replaced the dispute tag to better reflect the dispute here. If there is more than just one single source, A good compromise would be to include a range of numbers as oppose to revert warring to include a single source. But the sources would still have to be reliable. I'll check the sources when I get the chance and propose a reliable range. Until then it would be very nice if people stop reverting things. The totallydisputed tag is there and people would probably read the talk page before believing the numbers. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

45,882,385

` ==Article no longer just a list== This article has grown and is no longer just a list. Would other editors support a move of the article name to ``Religious affiliations of United States Presidents`` (my preference), or ``United States President's religious affiliations``? `

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

45,887,051

` ==Vanity articles== Please don't create articles about yourself or your friends. We're building an encyclopedia here, and it's very unlikely that your article fits in with that. Creating such articles also makes work for others as we rush to delete them. The Wikipedia policy on vanity articles can be reviewed here and here and the reason your article was deleted can be reviewed here. If you have any questions or need any help, please . Thanks.➨ `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

45,887,300

Exactly. The treatment I have received from Phil Welch, an individual who is on an obvious power trip and abusing his administrative resources for personal gain, is nothing short of outlandish and embarassing to Wikipedia. I have consistently been a strong contributor to numerous articles and it is somewhat demoralizing to have been blocked from editing a page of which I was one of the primary creators of. This behaviour on Phil Welch's part strikes me as being ridiculously hypocritical.

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

45,887,634

` :This is definitely unacceptable. What he did was definitely trolling the way I understand it (inducing angry comments). That whole section is titled ``Aucaman's behavior`` asking me to ``review WP:CIVIL`` without giving any explanations as to what I've done wrong. If this is not trolling then what is? I'm not sure why you're doing this. I just spent 30 minutes writing a response to your previous warning and now I'm blocked without even getting a response? His provocative statement is okay, but me (rightly) calling it trolling is not? `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

45,890,055

== Brontosaurus == Why is the Brontosaurus featured in this film? The brontosaurus didn't exist; its skeleton was the result of the bones of two different dinosaurs being fused together. Peter Jackson should have known better.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

45,895,262

::I'd love a picture, but that one is copyrighted. -

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

45,897,116

Well, it seems we can't come to an agreement. This will probably go on until someone gives in. I give in, I don't care anymore. You probably won't hear from me often in this discussion. Go ahead InShaneee, you are the admin, we can't stop you. Let me just remind you though: The customer is always right.

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

45,904,966

~How about a list of different states' ages of consent?

2,006

false

article

random

train

false

45,908,564

Um... I didn't know I messed up your sig. Please just calm down. And please don't block me for asking you to calm down.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

45,932,245

== Image Explosion == I normally like images, but I think that, for once, I have found an article with too many images. I'm going to cut a few out the are irrelevant or repetitive and also move a few around.

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

45,947,416

Hey Beback: I wouldn't call it enmity, it is a search for Jerry Brown's truth.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

45,951,577

{{unblock)) Im sorry, I was just erasing what i thought was wrong, i may have been a bit irratic in my deletion, this is probably due to my Bi-polar and Tourttes, I get can get a bit tempremental when on a low with my bi-polar.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

45,952,519

== I don't understand. == I was only adding stuff about Jason. Why are you mean to me now ( == ===

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

45,952,540

IVE GOT TOURETTS AND BI-POLAR!!!!! IM MAD!!

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

45,952,849

` ::Why is guy even posting on my talk page? And how come I haven't been given a respose in more than 8 hours? This is a clear case of censorship without any explanation and I'll deal with it once I'm unblocked. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

45,958,711

Reverted it. thanks guys

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

45,959,437

I think Eurasia is a much better term. Cheers

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

45,963,283

==Gay icon== I was wondering why she is considered a gay icon.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

45,971,922

` ::Thanks for the comment. I think has made this a little too personal and I'm not even sure why. This is part of a broader content dispute and he has made some statements that can only be interpreted as taking sides due to clear misunderstandings (the users initiating that page are not Iranians, but, on the contrary, are minority groups - so he's reading the whole thing completely backward). I'm not sure what I might have done to deserve this, but he tried to warn me against attacking the same user before but I did not think of it as an attack and gave a full explanation as to why. No matter what happens here I'm going to be filing an RfC demanding an investigation into this. It looks to me like this user has a history of blocking people for unnecessary reasons. Like I said this is unacceptable. I called that person a troll because he was indeed using provocative language (pointing me out by name and then asking me to ``review WP:CIVIL`` for making an edit he doesn't like), and I did not threaten him with a block - I was referring to his block on Iranian peoples for violating 3RR. This is unacceptable. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

45,972,736

I'm the one who should be complaining about this, but instead I'm blocked? I'm not sure how else I should have responded to this user without condemning some of the stuff he'd said. How should I get more people to take a look at this and comment?

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

45,982,023

do what I don't understand ???

2,006

false

article

random

train

false

45,984,406

== I volunteer == Hello. I saw your project and would like to volunteer. You can Wiki email me for more details on my background. God Bless!

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

45,985,421

Eat shit you fucking arse rapping jew fucking arab. I'LL KILL YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

true

45,992,374

== Split This Article! == This article really should be split into several different articles. It's far too long and several topics deserve their own articles anyway, such as Illegal Immigration in the United States and perhaps an even more specific one covering the whole Mexican Immigration issue.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

45,996,308

Firrhill High School, Firrhill High School, FIRE FIRE, FIRE FIRE, mississippi pudding, mississippi pudding, ding dang dong ding dang dong

2,006

false

article

blocked

dev

false

45,997,463

I put the things together. Just like u wanted.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

45,998,061

`:::OK, sorry, I didn't bother to check the page history. I didn't say that you are a moron and a troll, my intention wasn't to attack you in any means. But as I said, if that did (and it didn't) mean this discussion you would've been. • `

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

45,998,757

I fucked your dad last night you fucking whore assed cunt.

2,006

false

user

blocked

dev

true

45,999,232

Allow your face. Just seen it on your user section. You are the ugliest thing i have ever seen in my intire life. Why don't you just end it all. Do us all a favour.

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

true

45,999,751

Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore. Your mum is a big fat whore.

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

true

46,003,928

:Agreed. While Tamers had a different art style, Savers' style is much different from the past four seasons. I'm getting pretty excited D

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

46,004,414

` ::I didn't ask for your opinion on this. The block is definitely unjustified and I'll deal with it when I'm unblocked. You yourself have made lots of far more outrageous comments, repeatedly calling me ``anti-Iranian`` for no reason whatsoever. Your comments here can also be considered harassment. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

46,019,171

Please note that this is the ip address of a public high school, if you must block, only block the edit ability.

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

46,019,802

==Very US-centric== Almost every paragraph starts with discussion about the US, then mentions other countries as vague points of comparison. It would be nice if it could be more balanced. If this wasn't the main page, someone should probably put this template on it:

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

46,020,007

==Criticisms== That page has no substantiated claims and has unverifiable information which is forbidden to have on Wikipedia. No claims have ever been made about Starforce having to be removed via formatting the partition it is installed on because it can be removed via the official removal tool.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

46,020,310

That section has no substantiated claims and has unverifiable information which is forbidden to have on Wikipedia. No claims have ever been made about Starforce having to be removed via formatting the partition it is installed on because it can be removed via the official removal tool. Therefore I am putting the warning back up.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

46,020,875

:Eek! I've removed it from ITN already. |

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

46,020,912

` I've added a citation for Epicurus being the originator of the ``Problem of Evil``. There's probably a better one available somewhere, but this one will do for now. Not sure whether you were looking for a cite for the theory as a whole or not. I don't see a lot of mainstream media discussion of the ``alternate ending`` theory (except for maybe this article in The Oregon Herald, a publication with which I am unfamiliar), but there's plenty of discussion of it in online sources (reviewers and blogs/message boards): , , , , , , , , , , etc. As such, it's not original research, but it'd be nice to have a firm print citation if someone can find one. - `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

46,038,228

== vandalism . . . == fuck you, waggers.

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

true

46,052,309

don't thumbnail it, insert it like this, 1999 eclipse]]

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

46,054,086

== Glaswegians == I'm a proud Glaswegian, but you may have a point that these localised references are not obvious and would be better put as information on more obviously named categories. Trouble is, you've stepped on a hotbed of Scottish feeling. If you want to persue this, I'd suggest you open a centralised discusion on 'people from cities naming conventions', and cite examples from various countries and continents. You'll get a better debate that way.

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

46,058,478

` :::::::If i may be so bold, i really would respectfully suggest your review WP:CIVIL if you are going to continue on your copyedit role. Leaving multiple edit summary's of ``whatever`` is disrespectful to say the least, and calling other people's good faith efforts ``garbage`` and ``uninformative`` is really disheartening when they have clearly put quite a lot of effort into it, irrespective of the ``quality`` of their effort. I'm sure you do good work in copyediting article - however in alienating other editors you may not be helping the cause as much as you could. The article may be better in some ways, but it also weaker in others (the character list completely lacks content), since you are not willing to discuss and justify your edits, then i trust you will not dispute some minor reverts? `

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

46,063,987

== 3RR == has violated 3RR on Ann Coulter. Please see.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

46,071,250

I agree, leave the links alone already. But InShaneee is not going to give in, trust me. MoLi Admin

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

46,078,850

:::Sounds neat, and makes me sorry I only went for the regular release when I bought it. -

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

46,079,945

== i dont care == i dont fucking care if you have reported me!!! i will start a new account. see if i care. your still a fucking asshole!!!

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

true

46,080,407

== i am not blocked == i just got another warning. why are you such a dick? dogblue

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

true

46,080,763

== ok == i am NOT trying to piss you off ,but dont you find that touching another women is slightly disgusting. with all due respect, dogblue

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

46,080,888

wait, have you reported be so that i am blocked? dogblue

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

46,081,290

` :::Google Scholar turned up a hit for this 42-page paper by a gentleman named Ian Kirk, who's apparently a professor at Goldsmiths College. According to his personal website, it was written while he was pursuing his masters' degree, but there's no publication information listed. It discusses, among other things, the ambiguity of the ending. Is that worth adding as a cite? - Also, I found a citation for the deleted dream sequence in Google book search. It's on pages 111 and 112 of the book ``Who Wrote That Movie: Screenwriting in Review: 2000-2002`` by Chris C Wehner (ISBN 0595292690). - `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

46,085,055

:One would assume. Perhaps the person that wrote that passage was confused. -

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

46,092,112

== Khojaly Page == Dear Marshall B, Look at the Kojaly page. It is filled with Azeri prop and bias to the limit, how can we unite and counter this? Hetoum

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

46,098,085

== Discussion Pages == Don't edit articles and ask people to 'see discussion page' if you're unwilling to participate in discussions. As things stand, there's agreement on the Ann Coulter page aside from you, and you're not participating in discussions.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

46,098,444

Can someone please help me?? I was wondering what the theme for That Was Then, This Is Now. Is. Thanks, Nancy

2,006

false

article

random

dev

false

46,110,497

`== Matt Cutts and the National Security Agency == Matt Cutts had his resume posted at http://www.cs.unc.edu/~cutts in 2002. I have a copy. It says, ``January 1992-August 1994 Department of Defense, 9800 Savage Road, Ft. George G. Meade, MD 20755-6000. Co-operative education student. Completed four work tours (over a year total) with the National Security Agency. During my first tour I produced a sizable report on UNIX security which resulted in a $500 Special Performance Cash Award. On other tours I worked on natural language processing tools, telecommunications, and hardware design of an encryption chip.`` I said on my site that he has a Top Secret clearance. In 2006, Matt Cutts pointed out that his clearance has expired. I changed my references to past tense once I learned of his comment. It remains true that he HAD a Top Secret clearance. You don't work on encryption chips at the NSA unless you have a security clearance. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

46,112,379

== ITPA == Hi Dwaipayanc. The ITPA article is looking decent. I didn't know anything about it at all, so I could hardly add any info off hand. If there are different ITPAs, then maybe it would make sense to work it out in a way similar to Indian Institutes of Technology one main article, containing an overview, and then sub-articles for separate ITPAs. I'd recommend sub-articles only if there is sufficient to write moderately sized articles about those individual ITPAs. Otherwise, a single article covering all of them will be a better idea. These were some random comments. I don't think they were of a lot of help, but if there's any specific way I could be of help, let me know. Regards,

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

46,116,922

`This is a distortion. I agree that a separate article on Mr. Chase was not justified; I said so in the press last December. But while I played a role in identifying Mr. Chase, it was the New York Times and John Seigenthaler, Sr. who had more influence than I when it came to getting his name into print. And as I recall, Mr. Seigenthaler had a ``private word`` with you about how he might identify the vandal, and you gave him a song and dance about how Wikipedia is helpless (and by implication, blameless) in these matters. You didn't try very hard to help Mr. Seigenthaler. I tried a little bit harder than you. And now you slam me for violating this ``poor fellow's`` privacy. Mr. Wales, you owe me an apology. :`

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

46,118,842

Wow, never expected a rude response such as this. Is this how every member of wikipedia treats good natured questions (which I guess falls under the category of research)? Thanks for the correction, but that was uncalled for. Now another question - has there been any attempt to gauge the size of the internet?

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

46,126,360

` ==Princeton History and Supporting Data== I made this point previously but I think it got buried in the sea of discussions surrounding it...So here's my second attempt: The article reads, While at Princeton Theological Seminary, Dembski was involved in forming a group known as the ``Charles Hodge Society``, ostensibly a group concerned with resurrecting positive evaluations of Old Princeton Theology. The Society organized discussions and informal colloquia, but its primary work centered on reviving Hodge's own journal, the Princeton Theological Review. The PTR (over control of which name the society and the seminary wrangled) received funding from conservative Presbyterian backers (the Presbyterian Lay Committee), and primarily wrote from a conservative angle on theological issues of the day. Perhaps the most volatile of these issues was the PC(USA)'s consideration of the ordination of gays/lesbians, in which writers of the PTR (including Dembski) disagreed with Seminary faculty and their writings in nearly slanderous terms. All of which is to say Dembski welcomed controversy and political theological struggles, and was becoming increasingly familiar with the deep pockets of ostracized conservatives in the Church. To me this seems like an awful lot of historical data without any supporting evidence. It reads like someone who witnessed it giving a personal report. Without cites, it sounds like original research, no? I am not questioning the historical acuracy, rather I am suggesting some cites or some sort of supporting evidence would be in order. Anyone else have an opinion? `

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

46,127,501

== Argentine clean-ups == Thanks mate! Sorry about zi mistakes, mainly about the past/present thing. The Spanish articles are all written in present, and I forget to change them to past simetimes. /

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

46,128,145

:: A cruiser is a type of battleship, you know.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

46,133,925

== Sony Vegas == Good work on the Sony Vegas article - looks quite slick now. /

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

46,136,643

Sorry dude, but that's just the way the Wikipedia is set up. Either go with the flow, or find somewhere else to make your own world, with your own customs to follow.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

46,139,291

I think your attitudes are that of intentional Naivety according to Ignoratio elenchi. I'm upset because this is more or less the second time within a couple of hours I've dealt with it.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

46,140,797

== Apologies == I apologise for this vandalism. The reason for this is that the first two or three clusters of the above IP address is a school, ranging from 11 to 18 year olds. So, you can expect vandalism from 82.198.250 and/or 82.198. I'm not entirely sure about IP addresses and what one denotes the entire school however. Is there a way to tell the entire community about this problem? We're only talking about a single computer here; is there a way to talk about the first three clusters here? Again, apologies on behalf of St. Edward's School in Essex, UK.

2,006

false

user

blocked

dev

false

46,141,241

I didn't do anything, what is this all about...

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

46,141,750

I've already explained to you: I didn't change policy, I merely wrote it down. Your assertion that removing the POV tag was vandalism is at best dodgy. 3RR clearly states that 3RR is not an entitlement... etc etc. Just don't get close to it and you're safe.

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

46,144,630

Would Lancaster's daughter most certainly quarter as such?

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

46,148,639

I don't find your sketch. I agree that this article has huge problems. The biggest is deciding what it's trying to be. I'm inclined at the moment to think it should be about the philosophical side of the question of abiogenesis - Aristotle said it was a self-evident truth, then Pasteur showed it wasn't, but he simultaneously showed that Darwin must be be wrong on theoretical grounds. Kelvin drew attention to a second theoretical obstacle to Darwin, the 2nd law. Miller and Urey (drawing on Oparin and Haldane) then demonstrated that the 2nd law is not an obstacle to the spontaneous emergence of complex from less complex systems. But I'm not sure where to go from there. Some mention should be made of information theory, which is simply a restatement of the 2nd law. I agree that the critics section should go - it's peurile. Not go to any other article, just go. Panspermia in this article I'm not sure about - it's an argument about the details of where life mayn have originated, not whether it could originate spontaneously from non-living matter, which is what I currently see this article as being about. Interesting that Kelvin believed in panspermia, as a possibility. Funny man, Kelvin - no great scientist has ever been so wrong so often. About Pasteur, I think we need to keep this article simple; the nuances of Pouchet et al should be kept for some other article. (Or am I oversimplifying this article?) I'm leaving Wiki now, won't be back, so up to you to do as you wish.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

46,155,784

` ::I agree. Not yet. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

46,156,477

==Angry pirate== I provided the link to the Savage column as evidence of non-notability, not evidence of notability, so I'm glad we agree. -

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

46,159,167

== Nothing about illegals? == So Bushie boy is the only one with problems? This asshole is sparkley clean? Fuck Wikipedia!

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

true

46,161,196

` ::The book is written by Khomeini and the title is in the back of ``Jews of Islam``. The term najis is usually used in this context to refer to unclean things. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

46,163,576

` ::::Like I said, the comments were made by Khomeini, not anyone else - so they belong here. You can go ahead and add anything you want to any Rabbi's article. In fact if you read some israeli politician's pages you would find a lot of controversial sayings included. As a leader of a country, and especially as a religious figure, it's important to know Khomenini's views on non-Muslims. This is the only thing I've found so far. You can find other things and add them in if you want. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

46,164,469

` If you want to add stuff about uncleanliness you can create a new section and add them in. This section has been created to include Khomeini's views on non-Muslims. There's a lot more material to come and I'd probably create a new article about this. Until then we would have a section. All this should be pretty reasonable. The only objectionable thing is that the section is not neutral enough, but then again you can add positive stuff - and I will too. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

46,164,644

I already did. It should be deleted.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

46,165,301

== You are wrong == You are wrong in my opposition to Joturner's RfA. I do NOT oppose him because he believes something I do not, as you incorrectly stated, I oppose him because of the fear I have that, based on his zealous userpage regarding his religion, that he will NOT be able to maintain a NPOV. I am Catholic, pretty devout, and I would oppose a fellow Catholic if he/she too was overzealous in their POV. That said, I have the RIGHT as a sentinent life form to have my own opinion and that is something that the liberal left and the conservative right can NEVER take away from me, so don't even try.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

46,166,767

== Let's talk about sex! == You know you want it...If you don't leave well enough alone. You're obsessed with my thingy.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

true

46,168,760

== The Gay Guy == I know you. Wuzzup? I like sadomasochism. Gimme more!

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

true

46,169,398

All external links are supposed to follow Wikipedia:Manual of Style. Direct linking is the appropriate resort. You are plainly taking sides to attack my person, because you don't like me as a person dbiv. Go away and shut up. Stop readding that guy's sexual innuendos to my talk page and grow up.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

46,169,750

== Cease and desist == You must refrain from re-adding vile language to my talk page from hostile editors. To not follow my request, is to indulge the trollish remarks. If you delete this too, then you are effectively one-sided and bigoted. Please leave me alone and don't take sides. Don't vandalise my talk page with nasty comments. I ask nicely.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

46,170,737

**It would definately be in the rail atlas or trackmap as a marked location of an ex-platform, it lists staff halts!

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

46,176,315

` == ``What's a ballsy?`` == She really can't be that stupid....can she???`

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

true

46,180,550

Wow, that's like six-million times better than the stub I put together. Nice work, guys. -

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

46,183,761

My mind must be completely in the gutter. I am thinking about using some photo manipulation to add tougue to Jefferson's portrait and then take the photo with 18-month-old Kira, the with her legs splayed as she balances herself while she is sitting and... Oh no! That would just be too cruel. But it would be very, very funny also! (Remember Jimbo, it is only a movie...) Do you see Sam? You and I know that Jefferson and Kira are two valid living human beings and I am just using the power of suggestion to remind people of my presence, despite their attempts to obliterate me. The ghost in the machine...

2,006

false

user

blocked

dev

false

46,185,754

And to make it more delicious (pun intended), the girls have recently been fended off this user . I could not write this pseudo-real-life stuff as fiction if I had a mountain of heroin to help me! Real life is soooo much fun!

2,006

false

user

blocked

dev

false

46,195,578

` == Help me identify a vandal == On your RfA page, I see that you are interested in blocking vandals. On that same page on March 17, you forgot to log in once and corrected yourself. Your IP address from this mistake was revealed to be 69.182.48.34. On March 28, someone from that IP address added a note on User_talk:69.182.48.34 saying that it ``is registered to Canterbury High School (Connecticut) and is shared by multiple users.`` The note was added because this address was guilty of previous vandalisms. This information is confirmed by a dnsstuff.com lookup. Canterbury High School is a private boarding school with about 220 students boarding there. My problem is this: on February 12, someone from that IP address entered the new email address for Wikipedia-Watch.org on numerous ecommerce lists, so that the box would be flooded with spam. I believe that if this person was not you, then you at least know who did it. Out of 220 students, how many hang out on Wikipedia? I'm asking you to identify this vandal. What this vandal did is technically a felony. As far as I know, Wikimedia Foundation does not condone felonies. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

46,206,702

`And please note, incidentally how that pattern fits particularly well with that sentence of ``Vedanta westernized`` ... However, the spirit that had presided over the birth of this organisation [Brahma-Samaj] did not confine itself to this one appearance, for similar attempts were set on foot as opportunity offered, though generally with no better success... (R. Guenon, Introduction to the study of Hindu doctrines, p. 233). `

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

46,213,031

You have a good knowledge regarding Middle East.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

46,213,772

` Your edit was important. It is true that I do not see and know negative parts of all things. Your edits are great! + `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

46,215,290

== lame == You fuckin queer. Don't you have anything better to do than to monitor wikipedia? Go poop-stain your dick.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

true

46,220,870

== Go away == Go spread your Croatian Fascist Catholic propaganda on the Croatian Wikipedia. Here: Not Wanted! The world is fed up with genodical criminal Croats!

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

true

46,220,891

Note that the user zzzzz has removed lots of articles from the GA list, without providing valid reasons.

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

46,235,701

` **I shouldn't have said that I had blocked ``per your block``; that coud be read as a shifting of responsibilities. I have blocked , and as new and disruptive sockpuppets, per Wikipedia:Blocking policy; specifically: ``New accounts may be blocked for any length of time or permanently, and Sockpuppets that were created to violate Wikipedia policy should be blocked permanently.`` `

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

46,236,633

I don't know if this helps anyone but I thought I would mention that the reverse arrows display as boxes in MSN Explorer 9.2

2,006

false

article

random

train

false

46,239,756

== Lucian Bute == Hey, nice work on Lucian Bute on the Romanian wikipedia. You can always add stuff like stats and career highlights on the English article as well. Thanks for taking interest in my article and one of the best young prospects in boxing ! -

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

46,243,056

this was never confirmed by her. Sometime

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

46,244,078

guys, who cares?! Get a life, it's just an article on the internet thats banter for everyone looking at it. You'd be making a tonne of people happy if you just left it. I'm not really bothered about deleting the notices, vandalism my arse you're vandalising it by trying to remove it

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false