id
int32
0
7.53k
text
stringlengths
0
61.3k
label
int64
0
6
4,199
You started it... You most certainly did! Sabo is clearly a better hitter than Samuel. Yet you would pinch-hit Samuel because you predict that Samuel will be a clutch hitter and Sabo will be a choke hitter. Right? I'd call that "predicting the future". Right. I would have used aspects of prior performance which have been shown to be consistent in the past. Overall performance, L/R splits, even matching hitting/pitching styles. All of these will give me some advantage if used properly. EVEN IF ALL ELSE WERE EQUAL, there would be no advantage gained by looking at past clutch performance. And in this case, everything else pointed to Sabo. That comes down to the same thing. When Perez left Sabo in, he was predicting the future, the next AB. He was predicting that Sabo was more likely to get a hit than Samuel. By supporting the swap, you are predicting the opposite. Well, yes. You are aware of its existance. You claim to be incapable of understanding it (though I suspect you are simply unwilling). Yet you rather forcefully state the opposite. You don't seem to think the work is worth reading (yet you obviously feel the topic is important). I'd say this is insulting. RIGHT! This is the beef. It has not proven to be an indicator of future performance under *any* circumstances. At least none that we've been able to come up with. If you know of some where it *is* an indicator of future performance, please let us in on your secret. Most certainly. As I have repeatedly stated, if you can come up with a study which even *hints* at a consistent clutch ability, I would love it! However the straightforward attempts at such a study have all failed miserably. Well, it was a stupid argument. (Are you honestly debating that???) Sure, we know Sabo didn't get a hit. We have no idea whether Samuel would have done any better or not. One AB most certainly doesn't prove anything! Is this simply a prediction for Chris Sabo for this year? Or is this a prediction for *all* batters who have, over the past few years, hit (xxx amount?) worse in the clutch than overall? If you mean the first, then as you say, we'll just have to wait and see. But the second is a much stronger statement. In fact, it suggests a rule. We can then test this rule on past data to see if it worked for recent years. I think you will agree that if the rule didn't work last year or the year before, that it is unlikely to do any better this year. Right? I'm not going to get into case analysis. Sure, you can find somebody who hit poorly from '89-'91 and then hit poorly in '92 as well. You can also find those who hit poorly from '89-'91 and then hit *well* in '92. Gambler's fallacy. Unless there is reason to expect consistency, a run proves nothing. Can you give us a reason to expect clutch BA to correlate from one year to the next? I've seen a detailed study of why I *shouldn't* expect it to correlate. The "stupid" was in reference to a statement which *was* stupid. (And I don't see how you can deny it.) As for "total idiot"? Yes. If you prove yourself unwilling to even *consider* evidence that might suggest that you are wrong, I would say the term fits nicely. So tell me? Does the term fit? Or do you have an open mind?
0
6,883
FULL 1993 CALDER CUP PLAYOFF SCHEDULE AND RESULTS home team in CAPS *=if necesary FIRST ROUND Springfield Indians vs Providence Bruins Gm 1: Springfield 3 PROVIDENCE 2 Gm 2: Springfield 5 PROVIDENCE 4 Gm 3: Providence 3 SPRINGFIELD 2 Gm 4: Providence 9 SPRINGFIELD 0 Gm 5: Springfield 4 PROVIDENCE 2 Gm 6: SPRINGFIELD 4 Providence 3 (SPRINGFIELD WINS SERIES, 4-2) CD Islanders vs Adirondack Red Wings Gm 1: ADIRONDACK 6 CDI 2 Gm 2: ADIRONDACK 5 CDI 3 Gm 3: Adirondack 3 CDI 0 Gm 4: Adirondack 3 CDI 1 (ADIRONDACK WINS SERIES, 4-0) Baltimore Skipjacks at Binghamton Rangers Gm 1: Baltimore 4 BINGHAMTON 3 Gm 2: BINGHAMTON 6 Baltimore 2 Gm 3: Binghamton 8 BALTIMORE 3 Gm 4: BALTIMORE 3 Binghamton 1 Gm 5: 4/26 Baltimore at Binghamton Gm 6: 4/28 Binghmaton at Baltimore Gm 7: 4/30 Baltimore at Binghamton * Utica Devils vs Rochester Americans Gm 1: Utica 3 ROCHESTER 2 (OT) Gm 2: ROCHESTER 9 Utica 3 Gm 3: Rochester 6 UTICA 4 Gm 4: Rochester 4 UTICA 3 (OT) Gm 5: ROCHESTER 3 Utica 2 (ROCHESTER WINS SERIES, 4-1) Moncton Hawks vs St John's Maple Leafs Gm 1: St JOHN'S 4 Moncton 2 (at Halifax) Gm 2: ST JOHN'S 3 Moncton 2 (at Halifax) Gm 3: St John's 6 MONCTON 5 Gm 4: MONCTON 5 St John's 4 (OT) Gm 5: 4/26 Moncton vs St John's at Halifax Gm 6: 4/28 St John's at Moncton * Gm 7: 4/30 Moncton vs St John's at Halifax * Cape Breton Oilers vs Fredericton Canadiens Gm 1: FREDERICTON 4 Cape Breton 3 (2OT) Gm 2: Cape Breton 5 FREDERICTON 2 Gm 3: CAPE BRETON 3 Fredericton 0 Gm 4: CAPE BRETON 6 Fredericton 5 (OT) Gm 5: Cape Breton won
0
6,237
Isn't he the guy who took shots at Jagr and Ulf in a recent Sports Illustrated? I'm not familiar with Cherry's work, and maybe he's known for sarcasm, but I'd have to wonder about him doing commentary for the Pens.
0
4,676
They did last world cup and eventually lost tp Sweden in the final!
0
5,254
BASEBALL.....ALWAYS how he
0
842
Borchevsky is 5'9" and Gilmour is 5'11"...I think Gilmour slightly outweighs Borchevsky. Andreychuk is also about 5'11", I think.
0
6,423
And then cosper@seq.uncwil.edu (Kit Cosper) quoth: =>A comment made by one of the Braves announcers, attributed to =>an anonymous player after Friday night's game, => => "I'm sorry we didn't tie it up, I wanted to see some more => umpiring." => =>Just about sums it up............. Sure, like Ron Gant wasn't completely out of line. If I were Hirschbeck, I would have ejected, in order, Ron Gant, every single last Brave who came onto the field, and possibly Bobby Cox, depending on the language he used. Since Cox was the only Brave rung up, I suspect I would have thrown him out too. You simply cannot show up an umpire like Ron Gant did. It is disrespectful of not only the home plate umpire, but of the dignity of the game.
0
394
Not an astute observation -- this is a straw-bullpen. The lefties, Stanton & Mercker are strong, and Wohlers is down learning a new pitch. The bullpen is fine, probably superior. Also false. Gant, Nixon, Justice, Hunter, Blauser present a decent enough offense. EVERYONE is slumping (except Blauser), not just Pendleton. BTW, what is the story with Brian Hunter? Is he in the dog house?
0
1,658
FULL 1993 CALDER CUP PLAYOFF SCHEDULE AND RESULTS home team in CAPS *=if necesary FIRST ROUND Springfield Indians vs Providence Bruins Gm 1: Springfield 3 PROVIDENCE 2 Gm 2: Springfield 5 PROVIDENCE 4 Gm 3: Providence 3 SPRINGFIELD 2 Gm 4: Providence 9 SPRINGFIELD 0 Gm 5: Springfield 4 PROVIDENCE 2 Gm 6: 4/24 Providence at Springfield Gm 7: 4/27 Springfield at Providence * CD Islanders vs Adirondack Red Wings Gm 1: ADIRONDACK 6 CDI 2 Gm 2: ADIRONDACK 5 CDI 3 Gm 3: Adirondack 3 CDI 0 Gm 4: Adirondack 3 CDI 1 (ADIRONDACK WINS SERIES, 4-0) Baltimore Skipjacks at Binghamton Rangers Gm 1: Baltimore 4 BINGHAMTON 3 Gm 2: BINGHAMTON 6 Baltimore 2 Gm 3: Binghamton 8 BALTIMORE 3 Gm 4: 4/24 Binghamton at Baltimore Gm 5: 4/26 Baltimore at Binghamton Gm 6: 4/28 Binghmaton at Baltimore * Gm 7: 4/30 Baltimore at Binghamton * Utica Devils vs Rochester Americans Gm 1: Utica 3 ROCHESTER 2 (OT) Gm 2: ROCHESTER 9 Utica 3 Gm 3: Rochester 6 UTICA 4 Gm 4: Rochester 4 UTICA 3 (OT) Gm 5: 4/24 Utica at Rochester Gm 6: 4/26 Rochester at Utica * Gm 7: 4/28 Utica at Rochester * Moncton Hawks vs St John's Maple Leafs Gm 1: St JOHN'S 4 Moncton 2 (at Halifax) Gm 2: ST JOHN'S 3 Moncton 2 (at Halifax) Gm 3: St John's 6 MONCTON 5 Gm 4: MONCTON 5 St John's 4 (OT) Gm 5: 4/26 Moncton vs St John's at Halifax Gm 6: 4/28 St John's at Moncton * Gm 7: 4/30 Moncton vs St John's at Halifax * Cape Breton Oilers vs Fredericton Canadiens Gm 1: FREDERICTON 4 Cape Breton 3 (2OT) Gm 2: Cape Breton 5 FREDERICTON 2 Gm 3: CAPE BRETON 3 Fredericton 0 Gm 4: CAPE BRETON 6 Fredericton 5 (OT) Gm 5: 4/24 Cape Breton at Fredericton Gm 6: 4/26 Fredericton at Cape Breton * Gm 7: 4/28 Cape Breton at Fredericton * (note about this series: the AP reports that CB has won this series 4-1, but in the original schedule, Game 5 wasn't supposed to be until tonight and I only have the Oilers as being up 3-1)
0
511
This is certainly not the case. There is no significant *ability* toi perform in the clutch, but clutch performance certainly happens every time there is a game-winning hit. The "clutch pitching" quoted above is something which happened, not a claim that any particular player should be expected to be a clutch pitcher. Simple statistics tell me that there is a 2% chance an average clutch hitter would have this large a split (the average decrease is 7 points, standard deviation about 30). There will be such hitters in any league, just as there will be hitters who hit poorly on Tuesdays. And there is only a very weak correlation (.01 in my best study) between clutch hitting in the last four years and clutch hitting this year, probably because most of the clutch data is determinaed by luck rather than any ability. *Based only on this data*, I don't see any reason to pinch-hit for Sabo, or any other player who had been a poor clutch hitter in the past. But there are many other factors involved in a decision to pinch-hit. Does the pinch-hitter give you a platoon advantage? (Any portion of Sabo's clutch split that results from his platoon split is certainly a real ability, even if it has nothing to do with clutch hitting.) Do you have a singles hitter at the plate when you need a home run? Do you have a curveball pitcher facing a batter who has trouble with curves?
0
7,353
Have the rules for goalies' equipment changed? It seems that e.g. glove has become bigger and bigger all the time (and pads too), and the goalies are wearing "over size" jerseys. Am I dreaming? If you watch old photos or films let say about ten years back, I think the difference is quite obvious. Who is an expert on this, please let me know. (Or have the goalies become bigger?)
0
6,746
What the hell are U talking about? ESPN showed Pens/Devils game as advertised. BUt the morons at ESPN should know that Pens will kick Devils ass and the game will be boring. I'd rather see Boston/Buffalo game which seems to be an exciting series since noone had expected Buffalo to get past the first round. Well let's hope they change their mind on THU's game and show some other game. The Pens series is really getting boring. I want to see some exciting game no matter who wins. If NHL wants a major network contract then they better put some brains in ESPN people.
0
892
I think a compromise would work; namely honouring personages in Conference names, and using geographical references in the divisional names. Although I still do not think the move will draw fans to the game; IMO it's a cosmetic change that Bettman and the owners _hope_ will have an effect. And it doesn't say much for the mentality of anybody it works on, either. Surprise, I agree totally. The points system is fine, if everybody at all times has played the same number of games. Since this is almost never the case, winning percentage is the way to go. I don't particularly care if it is an "American" thing either, if it works.
0
5,646
I don't buy this at all. I think things are colored to a very large degree of preconceived notions of who the players involved are. Try this exercise: XXX is pitching today. His team scores 4 in the first inning, and 3 in the fourth. XXX gives up 0 in the 1st through 4th. In the fifth, he gives up 3 runs. In the 6th, he gives up 2 more. The score is now 7-5, with XXX's team still on top. I contend that if XXX were Jack Morris, the assessment would be "he is a gutty veteran who pitches only as well as he has to to win." If XXX were Mike Trmbley, the assessment would be "he is an inexperienced rookie who doesn't know how to pitch. Needs more seasoning. Send him to AAA. Or to the spice rack."
0
3,350
How about, Frank Jacksonsuck-Bolick or Frank "Cake Icing" Bolick or Frank it's not a cow but a Bolick or Frank How Do you get a ribbon to stay on a birthday present Bolick or Frank "Burns" Bolick or Frank Lee Bad Player Bolick or Frank "I Suck, not" Bolick and so on. Matt Wall * wall@cc.swarthmore.edu * Hey, I gotta job here, OK?
0
779
There's nothing wrong with a red neck. Why, some of us hicks even listen to cultured music and such, can you say the same? Aside from that, you shouldn't try to shit on this guy by insulting where YOU think he comes from. Where I'm from, we milk cows, drive trucks, and yes, even like baseball. So screw anyone that doesn't like it. Oh yeah, learn the difference between to and too city-boy! (see below) -thom unnumbered wanna-be member of the Bob Knepper Fan Club (BKFC)
0
6,616
I heard yesterday that Pocklington was talking with folks at Copps that afternoon (yesterday).
0
1,096
[detailed explanation deleted..] Indeed, you have struck right at the heart of our disagreement. To rebut my opinion, you have made an analogy with a game of chance. Your hypothesis assumes that the Lotto players have no impact on the selection of the numbers, and hence their ability to win. Well, that's certainly true in Lotto. But it has absolutely NOTHING to do with the sport of baseball. When you start down the wrong path, you finish down the wrong path. I repeat. I do not think that statistical analysis of prior clutch hitting performance is an accurate predictor of future clutch hitting performance. I do, however, think that analysis of prior clutch hitting performance may, for some players, indicate a deficiency in their game that indeed will provide a basis for projecting their particular future performance. And I think Chris Sabo is such a player. -- The Beastmaster
0
4,958
The Phillies have won two games back to back in extra innings. Last night's game was hard fought. The game in Chicago should have been a blow out. All in all these two games show a different Phillies team. In past seasons they tended to always be on the short end of 1 run games. I don't know how many times I saw them losing by only 1 run. If they were able to win most of those, they might have been more of a contending team. They are 3-0 so far in extra innings. And of course, they are 10-3.
0
780
Bob, sex is already ALL OVER baseball! Do you think those uniforms can get ANY TIGHTER?? Todd Hundley's could be, I suppose; he seems to favor the Carlton Fisk baggy-pants style. Very unfortunate. Todd, word to the wise: if ya got it, flaunt it!
0
6,880
Don't expect to get top quality, just some toughness. I don't view Makarov as a player who would add toughness. Nelson, you're confusing skill and toughness. Hey, get off the McGill/Hammond thing. I'm no fan of either. My point is that last year the Sharks had toughness that was missing this year. This year we had more skill, I'm all for that, but if your skill players keep getting beat up and injured they can't do you much good. Whether it's a cheap shot or not you can't let the other teams push you around. The 1992-93 Sharks simply got pushed around to much. Other teams knew this. They knew they could aggressively check the Sharks and not pay for it. Adding some players in the off season who will add some toughness to the team will help insure that next season other teams will be more hesistant to vigorously check our skill players, or to take cheap shots. It doesn't guarantee no injuries (nothing does), but it's something the Sharks can do to reduce the number of injuries. mark just say
0
6,443
According to an article in the LA Times, Todd Worrell will not be ready to come off the DL list Friday. It sounds like he has had another set back in his come back. At present, he has stopped throwing the ball. Supposedly, he had no velocity. It doesn't sound like there is any particular time table at this point for when he will be back.
0
2,643
*> *>McGill/Hammond -> Johan Garpenlov. Would you really rather have those two *>instead of Johan? * * By your logic then you enjoy having Falloon and Ozolinsh on * injured reserve? * Falloon was hurt on a clean check. He just fell poorly. Same with Wilson. I don't know about Ozolinsh. A judo coach would do more for the Sharks injury situation than Bob Probert. Actually, a judo/ju-jitsu coach could help add a really interesting wrinkle to anyone's game....
0
2,107
I hear ya! Then again, we must remember that we are indeed Cub fans, and that the Cubs will eventually blow it. After all, the Cubs are the easiest team in the National League to root for. No Pressure. You know they will lose eventually. Oh well, I suppose we must have faith. After all, they do look pretty good, and they don't even have Sandberg back yet. CUBS IN '93!!!!!
0
4,564
Can't we just stick this guy in the FAQ and stop responding to him, guys? The last several flame-wars with him have been pretty much identical. Could someone just collect all the articles from this one, and simply re-post the entire block whenever he tries to start one? It'd be simpler. Roger apparently is one of those embarassing specimens who enjoys flames. Why give him what he wants? Oh, Roger.. You're dull.. very dull... You should get a new act.
0
5,937
Tickets are very hard to get, even at the box office at Camden Yards. If you really want to see a game here (I go to school in Baltimore), price should not be an issue. Tickets go up to $15, but you should be willing to go as high as $20-25 if you really want to come.
0
7,292
0
5,047
I'm the tickets Grrrr, let's start a whole 'nother topic on show bad the sharks are doing on these things. I swear that ALL of my partial plan games were televised (I know, I'm exaggerating, but...). In order: -the new ticket prices suck -wait 'till people try to park at games next year. Public transit? Yeah right, I'd love to take caltrain for 3 hours to see a 3 hour game. Shelling out hundreds of dollars for partial season plans for two years doesnt mean anything to the sharks, as I get to pick my seats after the dead rise from their graves to claim their seats! :-) -Frank
0
6,008
Reports in Ottawa today say that the Senators have come to a verbal agreement with last seasons first pick and 2nd overall choice Alexei Yashin on a 5 year deal. As well the Senators have signed their second round pick Chad Penney who is currently playing for the Sault Ste. Marie Greyhounds in the Ontario Junior league playoffs.
0
4,922
Well then given your definition of "best" is it not conceivable that Alfredo Griffin could bring something to a team that that team needs to win while Larkin might not have that something the team needs? Would Griffin then be better than Larkin? No, I am not trying to define the quality of an individual, at least not for the purpose of ranking them. Toronto won with Olerud. They might have won with Fielder. They might not have won with Thomas. Detroit might have won with Thomas. Chicago might have won with Fielder. You can't rank these individuals. You can only look at who might contribute more to the team effort, which is winning the WS. Thomas could not have contributed to that goal any more than Olerud so I cannot say that Olerud is less of a player. --
0
300
I can understand your anger about the German audience. I mean, it was the Finnish team they played and they were taking advantage of the ridiculous penalties the Canadien ref called in the last period. The Germans got a match penalty and a 10 minutes misconduct for practically nothing and seconds after that the German goalie got two minutes for "delay of game" for a shot that was deflected and went into the crowd. The resulting 5:3 skating advantage lead to the deciding goal at a point, when the Germans were starting to come up strong. I am also sick of the nationalism that is going on in German sports events. If you watch for example a tennis Davis Cup match the players are often not able to play for minutes, because the crowd is so obnoxious. But I have to admit that this kind of nationalism is as strong or even stronger in most other countries (you should go to the US and watch the way they present the Olympics on television; or the soccer crowds in England; or the Finnish spectators at nordic skiing events.....). I mean it makes me sick to see all this nationalism all over the world and I would rather see the best team/player win and get cheared at. I do not mind if my favorite team looses to somebody that is better or plays more attractive and I have to admit that in most sports the German national site is not my favorite team to watch (the German soccer team is boring to watch, for example). But, reading the above posting, I think that you are on the same level as these crowds you are criticizing. It is easy to talk of (nearly all) Germans as Nazis and nationalists; thats the kind of propaganda that all ultraconservative people use against Germany. It is true that there is a great danger of re-arising nationalism in Germany but from my experience most of the people (at least of the people that i know) also regard this as a big threat and are trying to demonstrate this attitude now. Why can't we just look at people as human beeings and not try to put them into drawers corresponding to their nationality (eg. all Russians are Communists; all Americans are Capitalists; all Germans are Nazis, all Fins are hanging around beeing drunk on ferries...). In my opinion, your comment shows the narrowness of your mind and that you don't seem to be different from the Nazis you are talking about. Thomas
0
2,166
Well I think whenever ESPN covers the game they do a wonderful job. But what I don't understand is that they cut the OT just show some stupid baseball news which is not important at all. Then I waited for the scores to comeon Sportscenter, but they talk about Baseball, basketball and football. Then they showed Penguine highlight and went back to stupid basketball. Finally they showed a highlight of the OT goal but that was like 30 sec. I think they should give more attention to NHl during the playoffs then talking about boring basketball games.. I guess it is NHL's fault too for leaving ESPN. Hope things improve by next season... COBRA --
0
6,989
THe bowler is John Burkett, who went to 4-0 last night. He is a bargain pickup on my roto team, I got him at a minimum of $5. This is not really true. Excluding last season, the Giants has been a better 2nd half team. In 1991, they had a hot August to pull to within a few games of the Braves and Dodgers before fading in September. The Giants may go back to earth, but not as fast as last season for two reasons: (1) Barry Bonds (2) Roger Craig is no longer the manager. Dusty can manage his pitching staffs much better than Craig.
0
237
Minor point: Shea Stadium was designed as a multi-purpose stadium but not with the Jets in mind as the tennant. The New York Football Giants had moved to Yankee Stadium (from the Polo Grounds) in 1958 and was having problem with stadium management (the City did not own Yankee Stadium until 1972). The idea was to get the Giants to move into Shea. When a deal was worked out between the Giants and the Yankees the new AFL franchise, the New York Titans, approached the City about using the new stadium. The Titans were playing in Downing Stadium (where the Cosmos played soccer in the 70s). Because Shea Stadium was tied into the World's Fair anyway, the city thought it would be a novel idea to promote the new franchise and the World's Fair (like they were doing with the Mets). So the deal was worked out. I'm under the impression that when Murph says it, he means it! As a regular goer to Shea, it is not a bad place since they've cleaned and renovated the place. Remember, this is its 30th Year!
0
6,418
Wood is fairly small for an enforcer-type. I mean, Fleury does a pretty good job and isn't that large, but Dody is no Fleury. Having been witness to three or four of his fights closeup, he simply isn't ready to fight at an NHL level (assuming that it's his role, which is ALL he really showed us in his few games up from K.C. -- if he can pass, shoot or skate, I never saw much of it). All he has is a right fist, which isn't bad, but at the NHL level, the other players are smart enough to grab the thing before he can land anything significant. Once you control that hand, he's a fish flopping on the beach and the other player can do just about anything he wants to him. His entire strategy seemed to be keep the hand out of reach until he found an opening -- and I never once saw him find an opening worth talking about. He got neutralized quickly, and stomped on a couple of times. Unless he shows some new tricks in camp, he'll be on my "career minor leaguer" list. Since this was his first taste of the NHL, I expect the Sharks gave it to him so he'd KNOW what he'd have to work on off-season. He needs to get stronger, he needs to get more speed and he needs to show some versatility as something else than a simply goond, because he wasn't particularly good as a goon.
0
854
The problem is that (by no fault of ESPN) ongoing games are not covered 'til the final horn sounds. With two channels, SCNY and SCA, late-finishing games (up to Pacific time) and overtimes elsewhere will kick in at the end of local coverage. If SCNY is blocked by the Mets, there is still some hockey on SCA (SCNY Plus). With an ESPN 2, the current situation would be alleviated. gld
0
3,734
Wednesday's game of Beloved Yakult Swallows (At Jingu, 38,000) Hanshin Tigers 000 006 000 |6 Beloved Swallows 100 000 000 |1 W - Kasai (2-0). L - Ito (0-1). ---------------------------------------------------------------- CENTRAL LEAGUE STANDING ========================== W L T Pct. GB Hiroshima Carp 7 2 0 .778 -- Chunichi Dragons 7 3 0 .700 0.5 Hanshin Tigers 6 4 0 .600 1.5 Hated Giants 4 5 0 .444 3.0 Beloved Swallows 3 7 0 .300 4.5 Yokohama BayStars 2 8 0 .200 5.5 ------------------------------------------------------------------ --
0
4,134
Wiggins, Alan? But that's besides the point. I'm sure people would feel slightly sympathetic for Rickey if he were killed. But, they would also be criticizing him a lot more for his actions. Example? How about Jose Canseco? He gets a couple of speeding tickets, and all of the sudden his attitude is awful. What the hell do speeding tickets have to do with clubhouse influence anyway? So why do sportswriters talk about it all the time. Or Brian Hunter and Keith Mitchell? Both of whom had DWI problems towards the end of last year. (Two years ago?) It was cited as a sign of their immaturity, etc. Meanwhile, Dykstra almost killed both himself and Daulton, and I didn't read any sportswriter complaining about that. They may have talked about how bad it was for the Phillies, but I NEVER read anywhere criticism of Dykstra's character (or Daulton's intelligence, for that matter) based on this incident.
0
4,171
bosox-request@world.std.com to mail to the list: bosox@world.std.com
0
5,464
That's the trouble: *what* peak years? He wavers between excellent and very good, with no real bell-shaped pattern in there. 1979 was a fine year; 78 and 80 were merely really good. With the Yankees, 84 (I think) was the best; that was the one with the .340 BA. Of course, 1992 wasn't bad, either. He's been in the bigs since 1973, with a one-year intermission for surgery. Though he doesn't have the mix of skills that Pete Rose did, he's like Pete Rose in one way: he's not a natural hitter. Winfield's swing used to be the ugliest thing in New York, and that includes the Gulf+Western Building. But his sheer athletic prowess and physical size made up for a lot. Fascinating player to watch, even now. Not obviously great in any one way; but able to do quite a few things in surprising ways and at surprising levels.
0
5,405
ESPN had an advertise for Pens/Devils game 4. I don't know what the hell they are trying to do, especially against NFL draft. Well I guess there goes the NHL ratings for Sundays game.
0
6,379
NESN owns the rights to Bruin telecasts. I suspect that NESN was only going to sell one telecast to ESPN (remember, ESPN only owns exclusive rights to the FINALS, not the entire playoffs). Since ESPN bought the SCA contract, there are less wrangles to untie with showing the Devils and Penguins. I think the same broadcast rights factor comes into it. Plus they have no way of fitting western game times into their current schedule unless the NHL was willing to make a western club move up their game. I think the NHL got as much as it could when it shuffled the deck for ABC. Same exact coverage as last week: Pit-NJ game 4 in the east, Chi-StL in the central, LA-Cgy in the mountains and west.
0
5,563
It was a classy move. But it looks like ESPN is going to devote most of the coverage to the Pens. On Tuesday night, they continued to broadcast the Pen-Devil game even though Pittsburgh had the game well in control. Granted they did show some "bonus" coverage of the Caps and Isles but they cut away from the close game, which went into double ot, to update us on the fifth goal of the rout. Thursday was a good game even if it was the second straight game between the pens and devils. IMHO they should program some variety into the telecasts.(Yes I know the game shown on saturday is between the B's and Sabres, probably throwing a bone to us Bruin fans.) And what about the Cambell conference? I'd like to see a game in the Norris or Smythe. Why not have back to back nights of National Hockey Night? Just a thought.
0
1,833
Not to mention that Lankford had been hurt two nights before running into the outfield wall. This being the reason he was available to pinch- anything. His ribs were the problem so he could run but not hit. Torre is no white rat but give him credit for what he is , a pretty darn good manager. with the exception of the Felix fiasco, but i'm not sure who's brainchild that was. -BIL
0
641
While I can see why they want to cut down on the time spent walking around, Gant wasn't ordered back in the box "sooner", he was ordered back immediately. As soon as he stepped out, Hirschbeck told him to get back in the box. Now, Gant doesn't take a lot of walks between pitches. The only reason he did then because he was *very* bothered by the call. I expect his concentration wasn't there yet, and in a crucial situation I imagine it's best to be as calm as possible. Contributing factors would be Gant's bad day at the plate, bad year at the plate, and the Braves long scoring drought. Now, it's pretty stupid to go ahead and talk the walk when the umpire is telling you to get in there. You know the umpire is going to do something (call for a strike, throw you out, etc.). Gant was wrong. But Hirschbeck was more wrong, in my biased view. Aside from the major chip he seemed to have on his shoulder, what was the problem. Gant had a reason to want some time (disputed strike call). Gant hadn't been wasting time all game. The game had been cruising along, and was just over two hours old. The score was 1-0, with 2 outs in the ninth and a runner in scoring position. Is there *any* reason Hirschbeck couldn't, and shouldn't, cut Gant a little slack? For no discernible constructive reason, Hirschbeck disrupted the game, caused a five minute delay, and materially hurt the batter in a key situation. Did he have a date to get to? And I still wonder why Terry was tossed earlier in the game. -- Dale J. Stephenson |*| (steph@cs.uiuc.edu) |*| Baseball fanatic
0
914
[...] The events I saw were: 1) Called strike by Hirschbeck 2) Shocked-looking Gant asks for appeal to first 3) No appeal to first 4) Gant steps out of batters box. 5) Hirschbeck *immediately* orders Gant back in. [bad move] 6) Gant ignores Hirschbeck and walks off. [bad move] 7) Hirschbeck yells at Gant. Gant is silent. 8) Hirschbeck calls for the pitch. 9) Pitch is called a strike. 10) Cox argues (couldn't see when he came on the field) 11) Cox is ejected, players everywhere 12) Play finally resumes. Gant shouldn't have ignored Hirschbeck. Not returning made the strike call fairly likely. Although I suspect an argument might have gotten Gant tossed altogether. But if Hirschbeck had let Gant step out, the whole incident probably would have been avoided. -- Dale J. Stephenson |*| (steph@cs.uiuc.edu) |*| Baseball fanatic
0
7,214
: [ a whole lot of completely ignorant stuff about Pitt. ] Give this guy a drug test, and some Ridalin whale you are at it.
0
72
The tv coverage of the playoffs is fucking ridicules. Overtime time games that are not shown? What the hell kind of shit is this? If that would have happened to the Flyers(if they were in the damn playoffs to begin with) while I was watching, I would have gone throught the roof! However, everybody is getting pissed off at ESPN, but they are not the ones to blame. They have prior contracts that they just can't simply break whenever they want to. The N.H.L. is to blame. When they signed the deal with ESPN, they had to know of this. They had to know shit like this would happen since they wouldn't have complete priority. The N.H.L. should be feeling the heat that is being thrown at ESPN. How can the N.H.L. do this to its fans? How dare they. We are the ones that make the damn league exist and they can't even televise complete playoff games for us to watch! They more I write about this, the more pissed off I get. We must let the N.H.L. know that we expect a little better than this. If anybody out there knows how to go about doing this, let me and everybody else know. Well I had to get that off my chest and while I'm at it.... Mario is the Michael Jordan of hockey. All that fucker has to do is fall on the ice and the closet guy to him gets at least 2. Last night in the 3rd game between NJ and Pitt, he was being pushed while skating across the front of the goal while trying to get a shot off. The guy on him was doing a good job, so he got off a weak shot, but then he decided to fall to the ice. Then the fucking ref(Van Helloamend?) called the guy for holding. They replayed the play, and my roomate(who is clueless about hockey) wanted to know what the NJ guy did to get a call, because it was so fucking obvious the NJ player had both hands on his stick, and no, he did not trip him. It is simple, Mario gets touched, he falls to the ice, automatic 2. But the thing that really pissed me off is, Pitt scored the 3rd or 4th goal, I don't remember, on the resulting PP and eventually won 4-3. His diving/calls makes a HUGE difference in the outcome of a game. They gotta stop the damn holding and interference that is so fucking obvious. That is not hockey. It allows inferior players to bring down the level of the better players, and allows inferior teams to beat better ones. This has pissed me off for many years now, and it has improved somewhat. However, during the playoffs and 3rd periods, the damn refs must misplace their balls, because they sure don't make any calls that show that they got any. All agreeing or disagreeing replies are welcomed.
0
6,904
No way -- gotta be Walter Johnson. All were with Washington. Carlton spent too long in St. Louis to collect less than 700 there. I'd also guess Hough due to his length of tenure though I suspect Bobby Witt wasn't far behind. Maybe even Jenkins snuck in close.... Fingers had to have achieved 100 with either MIL or with SD so, yes, I'd go with that guess. Otherwise I was thinking that Reardon has a better chance of having 100 with MIN along with (I would think) easily reaching 100 with MON. Gotta be Willie Mays...I am fairly sure he had over 300 steals in his career. Hmmm...Leary is a really good point. I'd forgotten about him. Well, if nothing else, there are plenty of ex-Met pitchers in the category of "could have lost to all teams" -- Koosman, Leary, Torrez, Ryan, Seaver.... I guess the best three guesses would be Leary, Ryan, and either Seaver or Koosman.
0
5,413
So, that is the reason why the Toronto Blue Jays *should* keep Alfredo Griffin, just because it "worked"? A team winning doesn't mean that everything that it's doing is right. A team not winning doesn't mean that everything that it's doing is wrong, or otherwise (to borrow the Sharks' situation) you would say that George Kingston should be fired. By then, it's too late. The problem with "not fixing something while it's working" is that by then, there may not be anything left to fix. So, the Blue Jays were simply perfect last year; there was nothing that they could have done to have improved that team. NOT.
0
3,052
Again I assume this is not just flame bait by Roger, but actually a truly held opinion. Thanks. For speaking for all those who didn't feel it was important enough to say something themselves. I wouldn't say that the letter clearly implies representation of the views of a group that you belong to. It represents a subset (that you don't belong to) of a larger group (which you do, if only because this isn't a moderated group). Look, there are several ways to state an opposing viewpoint. Three that come to mind are as follows: 1) Say it subtly. Result: it may not be clear. 2) Say it directly yet politely. Result: probably it will spark some interesting conversation. 3) Say it directly and obnoxiously. Result: validity goes right out the window. You realize that anything you say can, and most certainly will, be used against you.
0
1,048
Well, here in Detroit we get to see and hear Don Cherry quite regularly. The Detroit area picks up Hockey Night in Canada from CBC (ch 9) in Windsor where we see Don Cherry's Coaches Corner between periods. We also get to see Don Cherry's Grapevine just before the game. The Grapevine is a hockey talk show where Don talks to a player or coach about what else: Hockey. It's actually a pretty good show and Don isn't as annoying as he is on Coaches Corner. I think this is were Don got his nickname 'Grapes' but I'm not sure. Don use to coach the Boston Bruins. I don't know exactly when that was. Could someone fill me in on this info? A local radio station here in Detroit (WLLZ) talks to Don every Tuesday morning. Personally, I've had my fill of Donny! He really pisses me off sometimes. During the Detroit-Toronto game Monday night on CBC, Don gave high praise to Doug Gilmour, saying he was a two-way player and not just a designated goal scorer and that he is probably the best player in the game because of that. That's fine and I agree that Gilmour is a good two-way player BUT he said the EXACT same thing about Yzerman about a month ago on a local radio talk show. What gives? It seems like he just has a set speech that he changes when he goes from city to city. Don Cherry: 'I think <insert star player name for city that he is in> is the best two-way player in the league today.' There have been other times (can't remember exactly what he said) that he basically changed his opinions to match the audience he was talking to. Someone here on the net said something about how Don criticized Mario Lemieux but when the time comes for Don to broadcast the Cup playoffs from the Civic Center (Yes, I think the Pens will make it out of the Wales Conference) Don will apologize left and right for his remarks about Lemieux. In my opinion, he is an ass. And I won't change my opinion if I'm in a different city. Sorry, if this didn't answer your question better but I just had to get this off my chest.
0
2,871
Tuesday's game of Beloved Yakult Swallows (At Jingu, 36,000) Hanshin Tigers 001 000 100 |2 Beloved Yakult 050 020 00x |7 W - Ito (1-0). L - Nakagomi (0-1). HR - Yakult, Arai 1st. ------------------------------------------------------------ CENTRAL LEAGUE STANDING ======================== W L T Pct. GB Hiroshima Carp 7 1 0 .875 -- Chunichi Dragons 6 3 0 .667 1.5 Hanshin Tigers 5 4 0 .667 2.5 Hated Giants 4 4 0 .500 3.0 Beloved Swallows 3 6 0 .333 4.5 Yokohama BayStars 1 8 0 .111 6.5 --------------------------------------------------------------- --
0
4,080
cdash@moet.cs.colorado.edu (Charles Shub) writes... What really irritated me was that they kept switching back and forth between baseball and hockey after they stated that they couldn't show the overtime period. I turned back to ESPN around 11 and it was hockey. Great, I pulled up a chair and watched, then the first overtime period ended and they went back to baseball before coming back to hockey something like 30 minutes later. Are they trying to alienate both hockey and baseball viewers at the same time. As for Martinsville, I wonder why they even bothered to sign up for it when they it was no secret that it coincided with the draft. Why not let TNN broadcast it ? George
0
848
A HBP, but it reminds of my favorite (apochryphal ? sp ?) Don Drysdale story. When ordered to intentionally walk a batter who had hot-dogged on him in two previous at-bats, Drysdale reared back with the first pitch and drilled him right in the ribs. His manager came storming out of the dugout and yelled "What did you do that for ?" Drysdale growled back, "What are you complaining for ? I saved you three pitches !" Incidentally, if this is true, I'd love to know the other people involved. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ted Kury | "One man stands... and the wall, cracks... and the wall, SUNY at Buffalo | cracks... and the wall, cracks... and the wall comes Dept. of Economics | crumbling down." - Anthrax
0
602
Curtis Joseph and Ray LeBlanc have made some big moves in the poll recently. Hextall has shown some strong movement as well. Kirk McLean and Tom Barrasso (I can't see why) have been added to the list recently. Keep sending in those votes. Current votes for favorite goalie masks (3pts - 1st, 2pts - 2nd, 1pt - 3rd) Player Team Pts Votes -------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Ed Belfour Chicago 32 15 Curtis Joseph St. Louis 32 13 3. Andy Moog Boston 30 13 4. Brian Hayward San Jose 26 10 5. Ron Hextall Quebec 16 8 6. Grant Fuhr Buffalo 12 5 7. Gerry Cheevers Boston (retired) 11 6 8. John Vanbeisbrouck NY Rangers 10 4 9. Ray LeBlanc USA Olympic 7 3 10. Mike Richter NY Rangers 6 3 11. Manon Rheaume Atlanta (IHL) 5 2 12. Don Beaupre Washington 4 2 Ken Dryden Montreal (retired) 4 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- Others receiving less than 4pts: Mike Vernon (Cal), Clint Malarchuk (Buf/SD,IHL), Tommy Soderstrom (Phil), Tom Barrasso (Pit), Artus Irbe (SJ), Tim Cheveldae (Det), Sean Burke (NJ), Rick Wamsley (Tor,ret), Jon Casey (Minn), Bob Essensa (Win), Glenn Healy (NYI), Tony Espo (Chi), Gilles Gratton (Bos), Rod Stauber (LA), Gump Worsley (Mtl/NYR), Pat Jablonski (TB), Grant Fuhr (Tor), Felix Potvin (Tor), Stephane Beauregard (Win), Mark Fitzpatrick (NYI), Chico Resch (NYI), Kirk McLean (Van)
0
7,481
NHL PLAYOFF RESULTS FOR 4/20/93. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CONFERENCE SEMI-FINALS BEST OF SEVEN PATRICK ADAMS NORRIS SMYTHE NJ BUF (leads 2-0) STL (leads 1-0) WIN PIT (leads 2-0) BOS CHI VAN (leads 1-0) NYI (tied 1-1) MON TOR LA (leads 1-0) WAS QUE (leads 2-0) DET (leads 1-0) CAL -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- New Jersey Devils 0 0 0 - 0 Pittsburgh Penguins (leads series 2-0) 2 4 1 - 7 1st period: PIT, McEachern 1 - (Francis, Taglianetti) 15:09 PIT, M.Lemieux 3 - (U.Samuelsson, Barrasso) (sh) 17:41 2nd period: PIT, Tocchet 2 - (K.Stevens, U.Samuelsson) 3:48 PIT, Jagr 2 - (Francis, Ramsey) 12:39 PIT, K.Stevens 1 - (Francis, Murphy) (pp) 15:43 PIT, McEachern 2 - (Daniels, Mullen) 16:46 3rd period: PIT, Mullen 1 - (Francis, Barrasso) 17:42 Powerplay Opportunities-Devils 0 of 5 Penguins 1 of 4 Shots on Goal- Devils 12 11 13 - 36 Penguins 13 10 4 - 27 New Jersey Devils--Terreri (0-2) (23 shots - 17 saves) Billington (0:00 third) (4 shots - 3 saves) Pittsburgh Penguins--Barrasso (2-0) (36 shots - 36 saves) ATT-16,164 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- New York Islanders (series tied 1-1) 1 1 2 0 1 - 5 Washington Capitals 0 2 2 0 0 - 4 1st period: NYI, Turgeon 1 - (King, Thomas) 13:14 2nd period: WAS, Hunter 3 - (Johansson, Miller) 6:33 NYI, Turgeon 2 - (Thomas, Vaske) 12:36 WAS, Hunter 4 - (Johansson, Carpenter) (pp) 16:51 3rd period: NYI, Hogue 1 - 3:31 WAS, Khristich 2 - (Cavallini, Bondra) 7:16 NYI, Ferraro 2 - (Flatley, Hogue) 14:50 WAS, Hunter 5 - (Johansson, Khristich) (pp) 19:57 1 Overtime: NONE 2 Overtime: NYI, Mullen 1 - (Ferraro, Flatley) 14:15 Powerplay Opportunities-Islanders 0 of 5 Capitals 2 of 5 Shots on Goal- Islanders 14 17 8 13 9 - 61 Capitals 6 9 11 14 5 - 45 New York Islanders--Healy (1-1) (45 shots - 41 saves) Washington Capitals--Tabaracci (1-1) (61 shots - 56 saves) ATT-15,421 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Montreal Canadiens 0 0 1 - 1 Quebec Nordiques (leads series 2-0) 3 0 1 - 4 1st period: QUE, Leschyshyn 1 - (Kamensky, Sakic) (pp) 4:19 QUE, Young 2 - (Lapointe) 11:41 QUE, Young 3 - (Lapointe, Duchesne) 13:56 2nd period: NONE 3rd period: MON, Bellows 2 - (Odelein) 11:05 QUE, Lapointe 1 - (Ricci) (en) 19:23 Powerplay Opportunities-Canadiens 0 of 1 Nordiques 1 of 2 Shots on Goal- Canadiens 8 10 15 - 33 Nordiques 18 14 6 - 38 Montreal Canadiens--Roy (0-2) (37 shots - 34 saves) Quebec Nordiques--Hextall (2-0) (33 shots - 32 saves) ATT-15,399 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Buffalo Sabres (leads series 2-0) 2 1 1 - 4 Boston Bruins 0 0 0 - 0 1st period: BUF, Presley 1 - (sh) 4:27 BUF, Wood 1 - (Houlder, B.Sweeney) (pp) 8:07 2nd period: BUF, Mogilny 3 - (LaFontaine) 5:03 3rd period: BUF, Hawerchuk 1 - (Carney, Smehlik) (pp) 14:48 Powerplay Opportunities-Sabres 2 of 4 Bruins 0 of 5 Shots on Goal- Sabres 9 8 8 - 25 Bruins 14 12 8 - 34 Buffalo Sabres--Fuhr (2-0) (34 shots - 34 saves) Boston Bruins--Moog (0-2) (10 shots - 7 saves) Blue (5:03 second) (15 shots - 14 saves) ATT-14,448 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
5,723
For those of you who read TV Guide, there's an article in next week's SPORTSVIEW concerning the NHL and major network broadcasting. Pretty interesting.
0
862
If ESPN/ABC is going to stick with one-sided Pens-Devils series(and it looks like they will continue with it on Thursday night), I'd rather watch pretty women in the stands than non-action on the ice where a slow,aging NJ team being taken out to lunch by a dynamic Pens squad.
0
118
Right on. Ticket prices are set to maximize revenue. Period. For an excellent discussion on how this works, see Gerald Scully's book of a couple of years back, titled (I think) "The Business Of Baseball". -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- We will stretch no farm animal beyond its natural length paula@koufax.cv.hp.com Paul Andresen Hewlett-Packard (503)-750-3511
0
5,441
that they out the little writing. Ranger last see Mike went who is the penalties and reason? Islander test hard
0
3,384
That's a good way to put it. It's a quiet confidence. I don't feel like I have to defend this team anymore. The Devils are a puzzle to me. They have long been one of the few teams I always dreaded playing. Their D isn't quite what it used to be but they still usually play us pretty tough. I just can't figure it out. At least last night they mounted an attack. Bernie Nichols was interviewed after Game 2 on the late news. He was shaking his head in disbelief over Barrasso, saying that Tommy is like another defenseman out there and how difficult it is playing against him. Then he got this far-away look on his face, his voice started trailing off and he said, "It just isn't right...it just isn't fair..." and he tried to muster a smile. As far as coaching goes, a Pens/Islanders match-up should be pretty good. One guy I feel sorry for in all of this so far is Chris Terreri. I'm sure Tom Barrasso knows how he feels. For so long Tommy would look up and not have a teammate in sight. Terreri's teammates really left him out in the cold in the first two games.
0
3,886
[stuff deleted] I think this goes along with a comment you made in an earlier post - namely, Quinn taking advantage of a major league bonehead for a GM in St. Louis. This trade was an absolutely stupid trade for St. Louis, and it was not the only stupid trade that this guy made. We can give Quinn credit for being an opportunist here. [stuff about other trades deleted] How do you figure? Both Vancouver and Detroit did the same thing last year: They both won their division, they had close to the same number of points, they both went down 3-1 in the first round of the playoffs before finally escaping in 7 games, and they both got knocked out in the second round by teams they should have been able to beat, with less talent. (Specifically, if I remember correctly, third place teams). How does this make Vancouver more improved? Further, if I'm not mistaken, the Wings had more points than Vancouver at the end of this season (albeit not many).
0
2,771
Path: ctron-news.ctron.com!noc.near.net!uunet!utcsri!newsflash.concordia.ca!mi izar.cc.umanitoba.ca!access.usask.ca!cs.Usask.CA!coulman From: coulman@cs.Usask.CA (Randy Coulman) Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey Subject: Final Regular Season Individual Goalie Stats Date: Wed, 21 Apr 93 12:27:59 EDT Organization: University of Saskatchewan Lines: 103 Distribution: world Message-ID: <1r3smf$67m@access.usask.ca> Reply-To: coulman@cs.Usask.CA NNTP-Posting-Host: skorpio.usask.ca I would appreciate it if someone could volunteer to verify the shots on goal and save percentage numbers for me, so I can put these stats on the archive site. Contact me by mail if you want to volunteer. Here are the individual goalie stats as of: Wed Apr 21 09:09:38 CST 1993 These stats include games up to and including the Sunday previous to the date listed above. They have been verified against what is printed in my newspaper every Tuesday. They don't print shots and save percentage numbers, so those are not verified. These stats are available by mail every weekday and sometimes on weekends, if I'm in town and I can get late game results. Just send me a note if you would like to receive these stats by mail. If you have any questions, comments or suggestions, let me know. Randy ------- MP = Minutes Played, GA = Goals against, SO = Shutouts, GAA = Goals against average W = Wins, L = Losses, T = Ties SOG = Shots on Goal, SV = Save Percentage MP GA SO GAA W L T SOG SV TM Player ======================================================= 1 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 1.000 WAS Byron Dafoe 11 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 3 1.000 HAR Corrie D'Alessio 40 1 0 1.50 0 0 0 19 0.947 MTL Frederick Chabot 25 1 0 2.40 0 0 0 10 0.900 BOS Mike Bales 2781 116 2 2.50 25 15 7 1287 0.910 TOR Felix Potvin 4106 177 7 2.59 41 18 11 1879 0.906 CHI Ed Belfour 1322 64 1 2.90 9 8 4 596 0.893 BOS John Blue 996 49 2 2.95 6 7 1 414 0.882 CHI Jim Waite 3702 186 4 3.01 43 14 5 1889 0.902 PIT Tom Barrasso 3890 196 1 3.02 29 28 9 2194 0.911 STL Curtis Joseph 1817 94 1 3.10 18 8 4 858 0.890 VAN Kay Whitmore 1429 75 0 3.15 11 10 4 716 0.895 BUF Dominik Hasek 3194 168 3 3.16 37 14 3 1354 0.876 BOS Andy Moog 1311 70 1 3.20 14 4 1 629 0.889 CAL Jeff Reese 3595 192 2 3.20 31 25 5 1813 0.894 MTL Patrick Roy 168 9 0 3.21 1 1 1 87 0.897 HAR Mike Lenarduzzi 1193 64 0 3.22 13 4 2 522 0.877 DET Vincent Riendeau 1785 96 2 3.23 17 7 4 938 0.898 TOR Daren Puppa 3880 210 4 3.25 34 24 7 1898 0.889 DET Tim Cheveldae 3732 203 2 3.26 29 26 9 1805 0.888 CAL Mike Vernon 2655 146 1 3.30 22 20 2 1314 0.889 NYI Glenn Healy 3359 185 1 3.30 24 24 6 1726 0.893 BUF Grant Fuhr 2757 152 4 3.31 20 18 7 1519 0.900 NYR John Vanbiesbrouck 3282 181 1 3.31 27 23 5 1531 0.882 WAS Don Beaupre 3476 193 3 3.33 26 26 5 1683 0.885 MIN Jon Casey 3261 184 3 3.39 28 21 5 1620 0.886 VAN Kirk McLean 2672 151 2 3.39 19 21 3 1322 0.886 NJ Chris Terreri 1433 81 1 3.39 17 5 1 686 0.882 MTL Andre Racicot 1939 110 0 3.40 18 9 4 947 0.884 QUE Stephane Fiset 2512 143 5 3.42 20 17 6 1329 0.892 PHI Tommy Soderstrom 1368 78 0 3.42 13 7 2 691 0.887 PIT Ken Wregget 542 31 0 3.43 5 4 0 225 0.862 BOS Reggie Lemelin 2988 172 0 3.45 29 16 5 1525 0.887 QUE Ron Hextall 2253 130 0 3.46 17 15 5 1067 0.878 NYI Mark Fitzpatrick 3855 227 2 3.53 33 26 6 2119 0.893 WIN Bob Essensa 1601 96 0 3.60 15 10 2 777 0.876 WIN Jim Hrivnak 1596 97 1 3.65 10 12 5 803 0.879 MIN Darcy Wakaluk 1591 97 0 3.66 7 19 2 757 0.872 TB Wendell Young 1163 71 0 3.66 8 10 1 573 0.876 TB JC Bergeron 2389 146 2 3.67 21 16 4 1180 0.876 NJ Craig Billington 1210 74 1 3.67 8 8 2 628 0.882 STL Guy Hebert 1302 80 2 3.69 8 12 0 664 0.880 WAS Rick Tabaracci 664 41 0 3.70 5 6 0 344 0.881 BUF Tom Draper 224 14 0 3.75 1 2 1 116 0.879 NYR Corey Hirsch 1769 111 1 3.76 13 11 5 932 0.881 PHI Dominic Roussel 2105 134 1 3.82 13 19 3 1184 0.887 NYR Mike Richter 157 10 0 3.82 1 2 0 78 0.872 NYI Danny Lorenz 3753 240 1 3.84 17 38 6 2069 0.884 EDM Bill Ranford 1735 111 0 3.84 15 8 4 987 0.888 LA Robb Stauber 2718 175 2 3.86 18 21 6 1545 0.887 LA Kelly Hrudey 154 10 0 3.90 0 2 1 66 0.848 QUE Jacques Cloutier 867 57 0 3.94 5 9 1 499 0.886 HAR Mario Gosselin 532 35 0 3.95 6 4 0 294 0.881 LA Rick Knickle 2268 150 1 3.97 8 24 4 1197 0.875 TB Pat Jablonski 2074 142 1 4.11 7 26 0 1250 0.886 SJ Arturs Irbe 2656 184 0 4.16 16 27 3 1470 0.875 HAR Sean Burke 1338 93 0 4.17 9 12 2 763 0.878 EDM Ron Tugnutt 1326 95 0 4.30 2 17 1 743 0.872 OTT Daniel Berthiaume 802 59 0 4.41 3 9 0 405 0.854 PHI Stephane Beauregard 3388 250 0 4.43 8 46 3 1711 0.854 OTT Peter Sidorkiewicz 65 5 0 4.62 0 0 1 39 0.872 CAL Andrei Trefilov 1373 111 0 4.85 4 15 1 784 0.858 HAR Frank Pietrangelo 73 6 0 4.93 0 0 1 34 0.824 WIN Mike O'Neill 60 5 0 5.00 0 1 0 46 0.891 SJ Wade Flaherty 2000 176 0 5.28 2 30 1 1220 0.856 SJ Jeff Hackett 930 86 0 5.55 2 14 1 559 0.846 SJ Brian Hayward 160 15 0 5.63 0 3 0 91 0.835 TOR Rick Wamsley 20 2 0 6.00 0 0 0 7 0.714 WAS Olaf Kolzig 90 10 0 6.67 0 2 0 44 0.773 OTT Darrin Madeley 249 30 0 7.23 0 5 0 146 0.795 OTT Steve Weeks 98 13 0 7.96 0 2 0 51 0.745 LA David Goverde 45 7 0 9.33 0 1 0 21 0.667 TB David Littman -- Randy A. Coulman, M.Sc. | ARIES Laboratory Research Assistant | Department of Computational Science | University of Saskatchewan coulman@cs.Usask.ca | Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W0
0
1,228
The *real* way to speed up ballgames is for each home park owner to offer the following schedule of bonuses to players on *both* teams: For all players who participated in the game, offer $500 for each 10 minutes less than 3 hours the game took (i.e. if the game only took 2.5 hours, each player gets a bonus of $1500). For all pitchers throwing 3 or more full innings in the game, extrapolate the number of pitches or attempted pickoffs to the number they would have thrown in a full 9 innings, and offer $500 for each number less than 120. (If the pitcher throws a complete game with 100 pitches and 5 throws to first he would get $7500). I suspect you could finance this the same way Presidential campaigns are paid for. Offer each fan a checkoff on his or her ticket that says "I want 5% of the price of this ticket to go towards fast game bonuses"...
0
1,000
Well, they just said that Franco will probably go on the DL tomorrow. (They mentioned a career minor leaguer as the "warm body" who would go along...I forget.) Also, when answering questions about the rotation, Coleman (SD broadcaster) said that Hurst is gone in about a month-month and a half, which is when he should finish re-hab. Later Dennis
0
2,966
ESPN is pathetic, I have been watching everybody complain about ESPN's coverage and I agree with all of you. Might I suggest that we are getting all worked up over nothing. We ALL knew that ESPN's coverage was going to suck. I mean have you ever watched during the regular season Sportscenter coverage of hockey? It sucks, I mean really sucks!!! ESPN does not know hockey if it shot them in the ass. I was really pissed of about last night, coverage. I go to school in Ohio I *know* the Indians suck, so why show them? If I were Bill Clement I would shoot myself. Anyway after I calmed down after I realized that they were not going to show overtime of the Caps Isles game I thought to myself I knew that this was going to happen, in fact I remerbed myself praying that at least they would keep even the boring Devils game. Overall I think ESPN does not care if they show hockey or not and I firmly belive that they have know respect for the fans. ie *because of contract obligations*, screw you ESPN. Praise be to all hockey fans who put up with this shit! GO HAWKS!!!
0
2,549
Two years ago Mark Messier appeared on David Letterman the summer he signed wit h the Rangers. I remember he and Mike Gartner taking slapshots at the camera, one finally was a bullseye and the screen went blank. It was funny if you saw it, I guess.
0
529
ESPN has been trying various things to get away from the follow-the-puck concept of televising hockey games. One of the main problems with hockey is that it is very difficult to show everything that is going on -- more happens away from the puck than in any other sport except maybe football and they can do iso's on football players to be shown between plays. The problem of course is that sometimes you get something worthwhile, other times you get burned.
0
2,095
What about black hispanics? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Man, you had better do some SERIOUS reading. I really, really doubt that you meant to say this. Mike
0
1,014
When I say "black," I mean US-born black people for the purposes of this discussion. Hispanic players were in baseball before 1947, and one team in the 50's signed lots of hispanics because they went over better with the local audience than blacks did. Don't know. But remember: this is the country that had special racial laws for one group and one group only: blacks. Our national history includes huge, long-term, global tensions regarding the black minority; the hispanic minority, while often discriminated against, has never been the object of national obsession. Absolutely. As I said before, I expect that this effect is disappearing. But it certainly did exist, and all out talk of TWG's and all that is not without some small reason. Well, there's the list. Go for it! I'll cull some more names as I go. I expect you're right, btw.
0
6,409
I believe Acker got a ring from his wife when they were married I don't know why you guys keep bickering about Morris. The stats show he is a mediocre pitcher at best (this year is another case), he just happened to win 21 games. I saw many of his games last year, he did pitch some good games. But this crap about being a clutch pitcher is nonsense, he was constantly giving up go ahead runs in the 6-8th innings (the clutch innings) and the Jays would somehow scrape a win for him. Another major factor in his 21 wins, is that Cito 'I dont realize i have a bullpen' Gaston would leave Morris in for ever, therefore giving him many more chances to win games (i believe this is the major reason he won 21 games last year). Barry Walker BNR Ottawa Canada
0
3,885
Your list of Jewish ballplayers includes Levi Samuel Meyerle (son of Jacob and Margaret Meyerle). Although that sounds like a Jewish name, Meyerle's "surviving relatives" say he wasn't Jewish, according to "Nineteenth Century Stars," published by SABR in 1989. Incidentally, "Long Levi" (he was 6-foot-1) batted .492 in the first season of the National Association, the first pro league. Needless to say, he hasn't been topped yet. (Of course, the NA is not considered a "major" league by officialdom.) Over five seasons, Meyerle hit .368 in the NA. He also played for the first three seasons of the NL, hitting .329. -- -------------------------- Phil Brown | aka pb6755@csc.albany.edu |
0
1,305
Does anyone have any information about the world hockey championships and specifically about the US team? Game summaries and/or stats would be greatly appreciated!! USA Today reported that the US beat the Czech Republic, but that was the limit of the story.
0
756
WHY!!! DC/Baltimore is one of the top media markets (=the only thing the NHL seems to care about these days), they've been doing far better than the NBA Bullets at the gate for the last five years. The team has been a perennial contender and fan support has been good to excellent . . . Why should Pollin move to city that's five times smaller but has as many teams in other pro sports. I don't get it...
0
6,081
But it is subject to all kinds of bias, and is almost completely useless for first basemen. From the raw stats, there is no way to tell which of a first baseman's putouts were made on throws from other fielders, and which were made on his own plays; likewise, you can't tell whether a double play was 6-4-3 or 3-6-3. Fielding Runs thus gives a first baseman no credit for putouts or double plays, only for assists and errors. It thus favors first basemen who play deep, reaching a lot of balls but forcing the pitcher to cover first more frequently. It also hurts first baseman who play behind left-handed pitching staffs and thus face few left-handed batters. This is better; of course, it still isn't all of a first baseman's defense. Defensive Average, which uses larger (and probably better) zones, has Mattingly tied for second in the league. While 233 batting runs is good, it is mostly in the past; the runs he produced in 1986 don't say much about his value in 1993.
0
1,859
Gant's ML record Age 28 this season. Year G AB BA OBP SLG HR SB CS 1987 21 83 .265 .271 .386 2 4 2 1988 146 563 .259 .317 .439 19 19 10 <-- 3rd Base Expt. year 1989 75 260 .177 .237 .335 9 9 6 1990 152 575 .303 .357 .539 32 33 16 1991 154 561 .251 .338 .496 32 34 15 1992 153 544 .259 .321 .415 17 32 10 In the majors for parts of 6 seasons, total playing time approx 4.5 seasons. Just looking at his hitting record, he's had 2 seasons of OPS greater than .800, which is pretty good for an OF. His 1988 season is pretty decent for a rookie 2B. The move to third base explains a lot of his 1989. When he returned as an OF, he began hitting again. And of course, last year he slumped. But no learning curve? He has obviously improved his batting eye over the years, as well as his SB/CS ratio. As to his fielding, he was an infielder when he was drafted, a 2Bman as he came up through the Braves system, and then the Braves put him through 2 position changes in the space of a year. He's an adequate OF, although not great, and at least some of your perception of his fielding is colored by watching him learn to play the OF at the ML level. (I know you're another long-term Braves fan :) About playing 3B...IMO, that's the 2nd most DIFFICULT position to field, after catcher. At SS or 2B, you need more range and speed, but at 3B, you've got to have quick reflexes and have a GUN for an arm. There are NO second chances at 3B, even when playing sandlot softball! Granted, I'd still put my best overall infielder at SS, but that's because he gets more chances, not because the job is harder. It still amazes me that so many teams have tried to convert other position players to 3B. But maybe that's because the supply of "natural" 3B is scarce. Finally, Gant is a player who puts pressure on himself to perform well, and works hard to improve. You don't get those amazingly huge arms on that relatively small body without a lot of weight work. Now, whether he's been overdoing it these days may be a valid question, as is the question of whether he tries too hard to make something happen during each at-bat. But frankly, if a player is going to not live up to potential, I'd much rather they fail by trying too hard, than by not trying hard enough. You might be able to teach relaxation to an adult; but at that age I don't believe you can teach hustle. All that said, I don't think I'd sign Gant to another long-term contract. He's 28 now, and I think he's free-agent eligible in 2 years, when he'll be 30. Given his career curve and limitations, I wouldn't expect him to last much past 35 as a ML ballplayer. He might surprise me here, but Atlanta's got some talent on the farm, and I'd rather take my chances down the road with Nieves et al.
0
2,199
Do you remember Game 7 of the 1988 NLCS, after the Dodgers defeated the Mets, and Ugh-a-dugh foo-boo fat stomach Tom Lasorda came running out on to the field in celebration? YUCK!!!!!! He undulated. His arms flew up and down, keeping time with his rolling set of 9 stomachs, which flew all around the cozy confines of Chavez Ravine. He oozed, like a white gastropod. He ran. It was a disgusting sight. Not only couldn't I watch my Mets in the Series, I had to watch Fat Stomach Lasorda roll around Dodger.... BLARGH! "If you like short, fat men, who grunt, curse, and spit a lot, Whitey's certainly your man" - Former WFAN host Pete Franklin, on The White Rat ... But it's true, this emphasis on the appearance of ballplayers in tight uniforms only works if the player actually has an extraodinary physique. Looking at Charlie Hough's scrawny torso through those tight white shirts just sort of makes me decide, "Hmmm, I don't want to eat lunch today...or tomorrow...or anytime soon...". When Al Harazin first became Mets' GM, he was asked if he intended to help redesign the Mets' uniforms and change their image. In particular, they asked him about the orange and blue racing stripe that runs down the sides the uniforms. He said that he's very much in favor of keeping them because "they're sleek and they're sexy". Sid Fernandez, in a tight-fitting uniform, with a sleek racing stripe to denote speed and potencty. Mmmmmmmm...lard. Kevin McReynolds, diving after a fly ball. Mmmmmmmm...Man O' War, baby! Pat Howell....well, never mind. Nothing could be tight on him. They don't make uniform sizes *that* small ... :-)
0
1,542
Heh, someone mentioned Tommy Soderstrom (Flyers) for the besk mask poll too (in the mentioned below part). All he has is a plain white helmet with a big cage. I found this pretty amusing. -John Santore Philadelphia Flyers in '93-'94! ============================================================================= ____________________ / \ "We break the surface tension \_________ ____ \ with our wild kinetic dreams" / / \ \ -Rush, Grand Designs \_______ / (*) ) ) / / /\___/ / Go Philadelphia Flyers! \_____ / / / / / \_______/ John Santore (jsbh@andrew.cmu.edu) \________/
0
2,616
... ... We must have been watching two different games. The Devil had one hand on Mario's elbow and pulling the elbow caused Mario to fall so the call was appropriate. Using clueless people to substantiate your claims doesn't give me a lot of confidence in your call either. Next time consider getting a second opinion from a clueful observer. Or maybe all those available disagreed.
0
1,093
Bowman is in the Hockey Hall of Fame as a coach already...and unlike Gil Stein...he didn't get their by stacking the Board of Directors! -) Bowman is the genius...Johnson isn't. Bowman is a great coach...Johnson, a very good one. However, Bowman is really not a modern coach, and Patrick's solution of having him only run the team on game days, and delegate most of the day-to-day responsibity to the assistants is a shrewd managerial decision on Patrick's part.
0
2,523
325/441/577.
0
4,164
You must be kidding, right? In losing Stevens the Blues got Shanahan and kept Joseph. Then they traded Oates for Janney. As a Hawks fan you have got to respect those "hapless" names. 8^) Lets see, who scored the game winning overtime goal in the 4th game???
0
7,436
Oakland, California, Sunday, April 25th, 1:05 PM PDT: Jose Mesa vs. Storm Davis. You have been warned.
0
3,730
Stanley Cup Playoff stats through games played Sunday, April 25 1993 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Top 20 Point Scorers Rnk Pts G A PG SG GW EN PIM Cty Tm Ps # Player --- --- -- --- -- -- -- -- --- --- --- -- -- ------ 1 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 4 CAN BOS C 12 Adam Oates 2 8 5 3 4 0 2 0 0 USA STL RW 16 Brett Hull 3 7 6 1 2 0 0 0 6 RUS BUF RW 89 Alexander Mogilny 3 7 4 3 1 1 0 0 4 CAN PIT C 66 Mario Lemieux 3 7 3 4 2 1 0 0 19 CAN CAL RW 14 Theoren Fleury 3 7 2 5 1 0 0 0 12 CAN TOR C 93 Doug Gilmour 3 7 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 CAN DET D 77 Paul Coffey 3 7 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 USA BUF C 16 Pat LaFontaine 9 6 4 2 0 0 2 0 4 CAN NYI C 20 Ray Ferraro 9 6 3 3 0 0 1 0 2 RUS VAN RW 10 Pavel Bure 9 6 3 3 1 0 1 0 0 RUS BUF LW 13 Yuri Khmylev 9 6 3 3 1 0 1 0 6 CAN VAN RW 16 Trevor Linden 9 6 2 4 1 0 0 0 2 CAN BUF C 10 Dale Hawerchuk 9 6 2 4 1 0 2 0 0 USA STL C 15 Craig Janney 9 6 2 4 2 0 0 0 6 CAN BOS C 49 *Joe Juneau 9 6 2 4 0 0 0 1 6 CAN CAL C 25 Joe Nieuwendyk 9 6 1 5 0 0 0 0 4 CAN STL D 21 Jeff Brown 9 6 1 5 0 0 1 0 4 CAN PIT C 10 Ron Francis Top 10 Goal Scorers Rnk Pts G A PG SG GW EN PIM Cty Tm Ps # Player --- --- -- --- -- -- -- -- --- --- --- -- -- ------ 1 7 6 1 2 0 0 0 6 RUS BUF RW 89 Alexander Mogilny 2 8 5 3 4 0 2 0 0 USA STL RW 16 Brett Hull 2 5 5 0 3 0 1 0 14 CAN WAS C 32 Dale Hunter 4 7 4 3 1 1 0 0 4 CAN PIT C 66 Mario Lemieux 4 6 4 2 0 0 2 0 4 CAN NYI C 20 Ray Ferraro 4 5 4 1 0 0 1 0 6 CAN TOR LW 14 Dave Andreychuk 4 5 4 1 1 0 0 0 4 CAN BOS RW 8 Cam Neely 4 4 4 0 2 0 0 0 2 USA LA C 12 Jimmy Carson 4 4 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 USA QUE RW 48 Scott Young Top 10 Assist Scorers Rnk Pts G A PG SG GW EN PIM Cty Tm Ps # Player --- --- -- --- -- -- -- -- --- --- --- -- -- ------ 1 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 4 CAN BOS C 12 Adam Oates 2 7 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 CAN DET D 77 Paul Coffey 2 7 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 USA BUF C 16 Pat LaFontaine 4 7 2 5 1 0 0 0 12 CAN TOR C 93 Doug Gilmour 4 6 1 5 0 0 0 0 4 CAN STL D 21 Jeff Brown 4 6 1 5 0 0 1 0 4 CAN PIT C 10 Ron Francis 4 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 USA WIN D 6 Phil Housley 4 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 4 SWE WAS D 6 Calle Johansson 4 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 8 CAN CAL D 2 Al MacInnis Top 10 Power-play Goal Scorers Rnk Pts G A PG SG GW EN PIM Cty Tm Ps # Player --- --- -- --- -- -- -- -- --- --- --- -- -- ------ 1 8 5 3 4 0 2 0 0 USA STL RW 16 Brett Hull 2 5 5 0 3 0 1 0 14 CAN WAS C 32 Dale Hunter 3 7 3 4 2 1 0 0 19 CAN CAL RW 14 Theoren Fleury 3 7 6 1 2 0 0 0 6 RUS BUF RW 89 Alexander Mogilny 3 6 2 4 2 0 0 0 6 CAN BOS C 49 *Joe Juneau 3 5 2 3 2 0 0 0 6 CAN STL LW 19 Brendan Shanahan 3 4 4 0 2 0 0 0 2 USA LA C 12 Jimmy Carson 3 4 2 2 2 0 0 0 2 TCH CAL C 26 Robert Reichel 3 4 3 1 2 0 1 0 2 FIN WIN RW 13 *Teemu Selanne 3 3 2 1 2 0 1 0 6 CAN MON LW 25 Vincent Damphousse All the Short-handed Goal Scorers Rnk Pts G A PG SG GW EN PIM Cty Tm Ps # Player --- --- -- --- -- -- -- -- --- --- --- -- -- ------ 1 7 3 4 2 1 0 0 19 CAN CAL RW 14 Theoren Fleury 1 7 4 3 1 1 0 0 4 CAN PIT C 66 Mario Lemieux 1 4 3 1 0 1 1 0 4 USA CAL C 29 Joel Otto 1 4 2 2 0 1 0 0 6 USA CAL D 20 Gary Suter 1 3 2 1 1 1 0 0 23 RUS DET C 91 Sergei Fedorov 1 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 10 CAN BOS C 19 Dave Poulin 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 4 CAN WIN C 38 Luciano Borsato 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 CAN DET LW 11 Shawn Burr 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 CAN STL LW 10 Dave Lowry 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 USA BUF RW 18 Wayne Presley Top 10 Game-winning Goal Scorers Rnk Pts G A PG SG GW EN PIM Cty Tm Ps # Player --- --- -- --- -- -- -- -- --- --- --- -- -- ------ 1 8 5 3 4 0 2 0 0 USA STL RW 16 Brett Hull 1 6 4 2 0 0 2 0 4 CAN NYI C 20 Ray Ferraro 1 6 2 4 1 0 2 0 0 USA STL C 15 Craig Janney 1 4 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 USA QUE RW 48 Scott Young 5 6 3 3 0 0 1 0 2 RUS VAN RW 10 Pavel Bure 5 6 1 5 0 0 1 0 4 CAN PIT C 10 Ron Francis 5 6 3 3 1 0 1 0 0 RUS BUF LW 13 Yuri Khmylev 5 6 3 3 1 0 1 0 6 CAN VAN RW 16 Trevor Linden 5 5 4 1 0 0 1 0 6 CAN TOR LW 14 Dave Andreychuk 5 5 5 0 3 0 1 0 14 CAN WAS C 32 Dale Hunter Top 5 Point Scoring Defensemen Rnk Pts G A PG SG GW EN PIM Cty Tm Ps # Player --- --- -- --- -- -- -- -- --- --- --- -- -- ------ 3 7 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 CAN DET D 77 Paul Coffey 9 6 1 5 0 0 0 0 4 CAN STL D 21 Jeff Brown 19 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 USA WIN D 6 Phil Housley 19 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 4 SWE WAS D 6 Calle Johansson 19 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 8 CAN CAL D 2 Al MacInnis Top 4 Rookie Point Scorers Rnk Pts G A PG SG GW EN PIM Cty Tm Ps # Player --- --- -- --- -- -- -- -- --- --- --- -- -- ------ 9 6 2 4 2 0 0 0 6 CAN BOS C 49 *Joe Juneau 33 4 3 1 0 0 1 0 8 USA PIT C 15 *Shawn McEachern 33 4 3 1 2 0 1 0 2 FIN WIN RW 13 *Teemu Selanne 33 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 2 TCH BUF D 42 *Richard Smehlik Top 5 Penalty Minute Leaders Rnk Pts G A PG SG GW EN PIM Cty Tm Ps # Player --- --- -- --- -- -- -- -- --- --- --- -- -- ------ 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 26 CAN DET LW 55 Keith Primeau 2 3 2 1 1 1 0 0 23 RUS DET C 91 Sergei Fedorov 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 CAN NYI D 47 Richard Pilon 4 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 21 CAN TOR RW 12 Rob Pearson 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 21 CAN WIN RW 20 Tie Domi
0
805
Don't let this confuse anybody. The Winnipeg Jets have never won the Stanley Cup (or even come that close). These Stanley Cup championships go back a LONG way to about the turn of the century. The Winnipeg Victorias won one or more of these Cups- the Jets didn't win any of them. Can you think of anything more irrelevant to argue about a playoff series going on today than who won more Stanley Cups around the turn of the century?? Lets face facts. The Canucks are leading the series 3-1. The Canucks dominated the Jets in their season series. The Canucks did better in the regular season than Winnipeg. Who is the better team? I think that the facts show that Vancouver is better than Winnipeg.
0
5,176
Okay... here's some gripe"ing" (?griping?... whatever). (I live in Santa Barbara... for reference... I think) Okay, ABC showed the Kings/Flames... fine... YAWN. ESPN (through a fortunate rainout of a baseball game) showed the Red Wings/Toronto game... cool. But I SWEAR that the advertisements all week long had said that ESPN would show Pitt/NJ on Tuesday and Bos/Buff on Thursday. I raced home from work early (4:30 Pacific) to catch the game, but ALAS, it was the Boston/Buffalo game and then they promised that they would show the Pitt/NJ game on Thursday. OVERNIGHT they changed their mind. I didn't mind THAT MUCH. I watched the game (hockey is MUCH better than NO hockey). During the game their were no video highlights from the Patrick division. What the hell was going on? At least they should show video highlights of the other games (especially the NYI/Caps game that was so close). My father (lives in Bowling Green, Kentucky [Bumbf*ck, Egypt]) got to watch the Pens game on ESPN. I just don't get it. The biggest problem is that Buffalo or Boston fans who didn't want to see the Pittsburgh/New Jersey game 2, will turn on their TVs on Thursday and see the Pittsburgh/New Jersey game 3 instead of the Buffalo/Boston game 3. At least, in my case, I just had to wait 2 more days to see my game. If I were a big Boston or Buffalo fan and I missed the game on Tuesday due to false advertising on the part of ESPN, I'd be mad as hell. Oh well... hopefully we'll get better coverage next year OR SOMETHING. Matt Coohill
0
6,296
IMHO this is the most untrustworthy, silly stat, by today's rules, in all of baseball. My understanding is to qualify as a save a pitcher cannot pitch more than three innings and the potential tying run must at least appear in the on-deck circle. Also, the lead a pitcher enters with cannot excede three runs. I believe that the official scorers must assert more of their authority in determining winners/savers/etc. For instance, a pitcher can come in in the ninth with a lead, blow the lead, fall behind, have his team come back in the next half inning and earn the win. Has this pitcher earned a win, no way. I guy could pitch five strong innings of middle relief and see his teammates rally to tie the score. Assume he came in to start the fourth and left after the eighth. His teammate holds the opposition scoreless in the ninth and they score a run in the bottom of the ninth to win. The third pitcher earns the win and the middle reliever gets no "stat" satisfaction. Mike
0
859
Speaking of Roger and ilk, whatever happened to good ol' gln? I had him in my kill file since last year's playoffs and now that I've moved to a new news reader which doesn't have kill files, I find that he's gone. I must admit, however, that unlike gln, Roger seems to know something about the game as long as the subject doesn't touch on the Leafs.
0
3,522
Wood played most of his junior career in Seattle. He was one of the leading scorers on a mediocre team when he was traded away in 1992. He rarely lost a fight and was one of the toughest players in the WHL. However, I was extremely surprised when he was drafted, especially in the third round. He certainly didn't look like NHL material...
0
7,254
My schedule is flexible so any games are candidates AC>(though I'd prefer to see Texas.) Hi Tony.I think that I might be able to help you out!The Rangers are here in Toronto Thursday July 8th through Sunday July 11th and tickets should not be hard to find if you order them far enough in advance.Although I don't have a ticket broker's telephone number off hand if you give me a couple of days I will be able to get a hold a= of a couple.The Blue Jays ticket info # is (416)341-1111 or if you want to order by credit card,call (416) 341-1234.If you let me know,when you want the tickets I can save you a possible long distance call.If all else fails I might be able to pull a few strings and get you a pair.Let me know whats happening. Drew Carley,Toronto Canada --- þ DeLuxeý 1.25 #2177 þ Go away,or I shall taunt you a second time!
0
1,700
DJ was a popular player in San Diego, Derek Bell was not faring well in the clubhouse at Toronto, so no matter how bad he looks now I still think it was a steal for the Jays just from the perspective of team chemistry. No statistic can describe it (sorry statheads) and since there are so many new faces in the clubhouse I think the Jays are still trying to find it. (Insert the same comment into the Jack Morris v. Clemens WS Ring string) Yet at first I was sad to see Derek go, still anticipating all of the talent they raved about at the beginning of last season. I'm glad to see him faring well for the Padres though.
0
4,615
> Bruins have never come back to win after falling behind 2-0 in > their entire 68-year history. Which doesn't mean much since the statistics are mostly based on the 5-game playoff format. But, yes, it looks dark for the B's. What a disappointment. Still, I think the problem is mental. They needed the saves Blue came up with, perhaps he can offer something to mentally rally around. Who do you think gets the start in game three? I hope it is going to be Blue. If the team can rally around him, maybe Moog can too.
0
217
I believe that Phil Esposito was the first to wear #77 when he played with the Rangers in the '70s. This was the season that they put the Rangers crest and "modern-style" numbers on the jerseys instead of the "NEW YORK" or "RANGERS" block letters and two-colour numbers. He took #77 because the Rangers already had a #7. (Hockey Night in Canada made a big thing out of it, saying it was the biggest uniform style change in a long time. This was before Pittsburgh and Vancouver changed their colours.) dwarf
0
6,357
0
6,891
I know, you all were saying "Ha! The Braves score a few runs for Maddux, that'll shut that guy up." But no, I think we'll just keep track a bit longer... Last outing: 5 runs. Total to date: 8 runs, 4 games Braves record in Maddux's starts: 2-2 See ya next time. Dennis
0
2,633
Awesome home record or not, you need to remember the 7th game last year at the Aud. I'd like to see some playoff games since I'm stuck in Buffalo at UB, but I think Boston isn't giving up so easy.
0
5,778
Can someone in this net post a Yankee Schedule? I need this right away.
0
1,609
Good question. It's my impression, not backed by evidence, that general south-of-the-borderness seems to exempt one from the hiring-firing effect I was talking about. Back in the 20's there were some attempts to hire black Cuban ballplayers; they were rejected by the commissioner and others. Well, what *did* I mean to say? Aside from some short-lived exceptions such as Japanese internment in WW II, only blacks were affected by laws regarding: slavery, Jim Crow, miscegenation, military service, etc. If my claim of exclusivity is not 100% airtight, that is, if you can come up with this or that exception, fine -- have a cookie. But compared to this list, no other racial group put up with a legal onslaught worth discussing at length.
0
4,352
Well, no. Although I admit that's more exciting than a rat killer. -- Dale J. Stephenson |*| (steph@cs.uiuc.edu) |*| Baseball fanatic
0