instruction stringlengths 55 58 | input stringclasses 1
value | output stringlengths 21 4k |
|---|---|---|
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-2913. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-2799. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-2799. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-2799 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-2937. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-3663, CVE-2005-3664. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue, but multiple advisories used this candidate for different issues. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2005-3663 and CVE-2005-3664 to determine which ID is appropriate. ... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-2942. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate has been revoked by its Candidate Numbering Authority (CNA) because it was initially assigned to a problem that was not a security issue. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-2965. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-4802, CVE-2005-4803. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue, but the description and references inadvertently combined multiple issues. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2005-4802 and CVE-2005-4803 to determine which ID is approp... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-3028. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-2986. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-2986. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-2986 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-3056. | TWiki allows arbitrary shell command execution via the Include function | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-3117. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-3150. Reason: This candidate was privately assigned by a CNA to an issue, but the issue was published through separate channels and assigned a new identifier by the MITRE CNA, so it is a duplicate of CVE-2005-3150. Notes: All CVE users should ref... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-3122. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-3424, CVE-2005-3425. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue, but two different authoritative sources used it for two distinct issues. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2005-3424 and CVE-2005-3425 to determine which ID is appropri... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-3125. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-3162. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-3160. Reason: this candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-3160. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-3160 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-3195. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-3178. Reason: this candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-3178; the duplicate arose from a pre-candidate that was not deleted during the editing phase. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-3178 instead of this candidate. All references a... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-3266. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-3265. Reason: this candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-3265; after initial reservation, the requester discovered that they had the same cause. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-3265 instead of this candidate. All references and des... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-3362. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-3153. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2005-3153. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-3153 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-3542. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-3508. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2005-3508. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-3508 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-3561. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-2954. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2005-2954. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-2954 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-3562. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-2955. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2005-2955. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-2955 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-3563. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-2956. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-2956. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-2956 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-3590. | The getgrouplist function in the GNU C library (glibc) before version 2.3.5, when invoked with a zero argument, writes to the passed pointer even if the specified array size is zero, leading to a buffer overflow and potentially allowing attackers to corrupt memory. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-3597. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-3573. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-3573. A CNA error by MITRE introduced the duplicate. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-3573 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have ... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-3637. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-3530. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-3530. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-3530 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-3703. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-2272. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-2272. It was reserved when another candidate was already public. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-2272 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this can... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-3898. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-3567. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2005-3567. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-3567 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-3965. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2004-2607. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2004-2607. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2004-2607 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-3990. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-3619. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-3619. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-3619 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-3994. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-3967. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-3967. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-3967 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4067. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-4031. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2005-4031. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-4031 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4070. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-3665. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2005-3665. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-3665 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4096. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4097. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4098. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4099. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4100. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4101. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4102. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4103. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4104. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4105. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4106. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4107. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4108. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4109. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4110. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4111. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4112. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4113. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4114. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4115. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4116. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4117. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4118. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4119. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4120. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4121. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4122. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4123. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4124. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4125. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4127. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-4092. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-4092. This candidate was originally published to handle a pre-patch vague announcement, but multiple simultaneous pre-patch announcements resulted in duplicate CVEs that could not be identi... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4128. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-4092. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-4092. This candidate was originally published to handle a pre-patch vague announcement, but multiple simultaneous pre-patch announcements resulted in duplicate CVEs that could not be identi... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4129. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-4092. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2005-4092. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-4092 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4265. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-4209. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-4209. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-4209 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4340. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-4206. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-4206. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-4206 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4531. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-3345. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-3345. CVE-2005-3345 had already been assigned, but not published, before this candidate was created. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-3345 instead of this candidate. All ref... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4535. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4537. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4538. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4539. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4540. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4541. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4542. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4543. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4544. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4561. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was assigned in 2005 to an issue that would not be published until 2006, so new identifiers were assigned. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4562. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was assigned in 2005 to an issue that would not be published until 2006, so new identifiers were assigned. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4633. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-4619. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-4619. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-4619 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4890. | There is a possible tty hijacking in shadow 4.x before 4.1.5 and sudo 1.x before 1.7.4 via "su - user -c program". The user session can be escaped to the parent session by using the TIOCSTI ioctl to push characters into the input buffer to be read by the next process. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4891. | Simple Machine Forum (SMF) versions 1.0.4 and earlier have an SQL injection vulnerability that allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL statements. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4892. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4893. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2005-4894. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-0011. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-0016. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-0017. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-0018. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-3899. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-3899. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-3899 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-0041. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-0061. | xlockmore 5.13 and 5.22 segfaults when using libpam-opensc and returns the underlying xsession. This allows unauthorized users access to the X session. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-0062. | xlockmore 5.13 allows potential xlock bypass when FVWM switches to the same virtual desktop as a new Gaim window. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-0092. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-0992, CVE-2006-0158. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue, but a typo caused it to be associated with a Novell/Groupwise issue. In addition, this issue was a duplicate of a SiteSuite issue that was also assigned CVE-2006-0158. Note... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-0170. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-0035. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-0035. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-0035 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-0186. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-4500. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-4500. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-4500 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-0264. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-0259. Reason: This candidate is subsumed by CVE-2006-0259. An error during initial CVE analysis used the wrong set of affected versions for "DB10". Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-0259 instead of this candidate. All references an... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-0390. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-4504. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-4504. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-4504 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-0394. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-0848. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-0848. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-0848 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-0556. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-0560. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-0740. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-0849. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-0904. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-0975. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-0459. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2006-0459. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-0459 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-10001. | A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Subscribe to Comments Plugin up to 2.0.7 on WordPress. This affects an unknown part of the file subscribe-to-comments.php. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 2.0.8 is able... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.