instruction stringlengths 55 58 | input stringclasses 1
value | output stringlengths 21 4k |
|---|---|---|
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5694. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5695. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5696. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5697. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5698. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5699. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5700. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5756. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5848. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-5878. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-5878. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-5878 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5941. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-2177. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-2177. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-2177 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5992. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5993. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5995. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5996. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5997. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5998. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5999. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-6000. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-6001. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-6002. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-6003. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-6004. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-6005. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-6006. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-6098. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-6099. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-6100. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-6114. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-5854. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-5854. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-5854 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-6362. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-5873. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-5873. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-5873 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-6491. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-6492. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-6967. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). In addition, it describes standard behavior (publ... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-7084. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-7083. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-7083. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-7083 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-7224. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-7227, CVE-2005-4872, CVE-2006-7228. Reason: this candidate was SPLIT into other identifiers in order to reflect different affected versions and distinct vendor fixes. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2006-7227, CVE-2005-4872, and CVE-2006... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-7246. | NetworkManager 0.9.x does not pin a certificate's subject to an ESSID when 802.11X authentication is used. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-7248. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-7250, CVE-2012-1410. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue, but CVE users may have associated it with multiple unrelated issues. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2006-7250 for the OpenSSL candidate or CVE-2012-1410 for the Kadu... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-7249. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-7250, CVE-2012-1410. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue, but CVE users may have associated it with multiple unrelated issues. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2006-7250 for the OpenSSL candidate or CVE-2012-1410 for the Kadu... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-7251. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-7254. | The nscd daemon in the GNU C Library (glibc) before version 2.5 does not close incoming client sockets if they cannot be handled by the daemon, allowing local users to carry out a denial of service attack on the daemon. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-0032. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-0036. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-0037. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-0158. | thttpd 2007 has buffer underflow. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-0207. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-0212. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-0234. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-0243. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-0243. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-0243 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-0621. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-6456. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-6456. It was assigned for a targeted zero-day attack, but further analysis revealed it was for an older issue. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-6456 instead of this candidate... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-0691. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2066. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-2066. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2066 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-0727. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-0818. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-0396. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-0396. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-0396 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-0899. | There is a possible heap overflow in libclamav/fsg.c before 0.100.0. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-0935. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-0937. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-0941. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-0989. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-0990. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-0991. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-0992. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-0993. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-0933. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-0933 due to a typo. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-0933 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-10001. | A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in web-cyradm. This affects an unknown part of the file search.php. The manipulation of the argument searchstring leads to sql injection. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The identifier VDB-217449 was assigned to this vulnerability. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-10002. | A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in web-cyradm. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file auth.inc.php. The manipulation of the argument login/login_password/LANG leads to sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The name of the patch is 2bcbead3bdb5f11... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-10003. | A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in The Hackers Diet Plugin up to 0.9.6b on WordPress. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file ajax_blurb.php of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. The manipulation of the argument user leads to sql injection. The attack may be initia... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-1207. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-1208. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-1210. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-1323. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2893. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue, but some sources used this identifier for a separate issue, and a duplicate identifier had also been created by the time dual use was detected. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2007... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-1348. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-1356. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-1570. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-1438. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-1438. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-1438 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-1627. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-4606. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-4606. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-4606 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-1740. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-4843. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-4843. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-4843 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-1752. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-1499. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-1499. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-1499 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-1753. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-1755. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-1757. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-1758. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-1759. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-1760. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-1761. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-1769. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-1873. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-1873. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-1873 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-1783. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-1685. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-1685. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-1685 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-1857. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-20001. | A flaw was found in StarWind iSCSI target. An attacker could script standard iSCSI Initiator operation(s) to exhaust the StarWind service socket, which could lead to denial of service. This affects iSCSI SAN (Windows Native) Version 3.2.2 build 2007-02-20. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-2056. | Rejected reason: The getlock function in aimage/aimage.cpp in AFFLIB 2.2.8 and earlier allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on temporary lock files (aka "time-of-check-time-of-use file race"). NOTE: the researcher has retracted the original advisory, stating that "the portion of vulnerab... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-2215. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-2220. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-2226. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-2413. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2459. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-2459. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2459 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-2436. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-1861. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-1861. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-1861 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-2518. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2518. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2007-2518. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2518 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-2653. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2438. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-2438. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2438 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-2841. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-3947. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2007-3947. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-3947 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-3004. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2788. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-2788. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2788 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-3005. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2789. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-2789. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2789 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-3031. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-3090. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-0591. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-0591. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-0591 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-3125. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-6772. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-6772. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-6772 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-3395. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2836. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-2836. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2836 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-3595. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-3399. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-3399. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-3399 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-3732. | In Linux 2.6 before 2.6.23, the TRACE_IRQS_ON function in iret_exc calls a C function without ensuring that the segments are set properly. The kernel's %fs needs to be restored before the call in TRACE_IRQS_ON and before enabling interrupts, so that "current" references work. Without this, "current" used in the window ... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.