instruction stringlengths 55 58 | input stringclasses 1
value | output stringlengths 21 4k |
|---|---|---|
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-1053. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-1054. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-1861. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2006-1861. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-1861 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-1086. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-1083. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-1083. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-1083 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-1169. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-1170. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-1171. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-1187. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-1299. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-1307. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-1310. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-1312. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-1317. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-1424. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-1482. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-1482. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-1482 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-1512. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-1712. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2006-1712. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-1712 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-1519. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-2224. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-2224. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-2224 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-1521. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-1663. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-0996. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2006-0996. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-0996 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-1845. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-0537. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-0537. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-0537 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-20001. | A carefully crafted If: request header can cause a memory read, or write of a single zero byte, in a pool (heap) memory location beyond the header value sent. This could cause the process to crash.
This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.54 and earlier. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-2125. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-3779. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-3779. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-3779 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-2215. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-2181. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-2181. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-2181 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-2350. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-2344. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-2344. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-2344 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-2375. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-2377. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-2381. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-2493. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-1861. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-1861. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-1861 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-2593. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-2581. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-2581. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-2581 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-2594. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-2582. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-2582. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-2582 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-2595. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-2583. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-2583. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-2583 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-2596. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-2584. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-2584. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-2584 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-2597. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-2585. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-2585. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-2585 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-2598. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-2586. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-2586. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-2586 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-2599. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-2587. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-2587. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-2587 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-2600. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-2588. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-2588. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-2588 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-2601. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-2589. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-2589. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-2589 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-2602. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-2590. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-2590. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-2590 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-2603. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-2591. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-2591. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-2591 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-2604. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-2592. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-2592. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-2592 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-2657. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-3017. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2006-3017. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-3017 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-2938. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-2937. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. it was incorrectly used to identify CVE-2006-2937. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-2939. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-3008. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-2904. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-2904. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-2904 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-3100. | termpkg 3.3 suffers from buffer overflow. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-3248. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-4011. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-4011. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-4011 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-3432. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-0028. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2007-0028. The original assigner switched to a new CVE number. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-0028 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in thi... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-3433. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-3437. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-3446. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-3447. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-3466. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-3600. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2006-3600. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-3600 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-3641. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-3642. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-3644. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-3645. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-3646. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-3863. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-3865. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-3866. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-4868. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-4868. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-4868 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-3870. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-3871. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-3872. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-3874. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-4170. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-4812. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2006-4812. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-4812 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-4180. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of another identifier and was never published. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-4216. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-4159. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-4159. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-4159 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-4225. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-3139. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-3139. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-3139 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-4243. | linux vserver 2.6 before 2.6.17 suffers from privilege escalation in remount code. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-4245. | archivemail 0.6.2 uses temporary files insecurely leading to a possible race condition. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-4261. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-4253. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-4253. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-4253 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-4274. | Rejected reason: Unknown vulnerability in Microsoft PowerPoint allows user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted PPT document, as exploited by malware such as TROJ_MDROPPER.BH. NOTE: on 20060822, it was determined that TROJ_MDROPPER.BH was exploiting CVE-2006-0009, so this is not a new vulnerabili... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-4341. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-4340. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. It is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2006-4340. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-4340 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been r... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-4690. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-4698. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-4699. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-4700. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-4701. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-4703. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-4840. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-3888. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2006-3888. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-3888 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-4854. | Rejected reason: Unspecified vulnerability in Microsoft Office 2000 (Chinese Edition) and Microsoft PowerPoint 2000 (Chinese Edition) allows user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted PPT document, as exploited by malware such as Trojan.PPDropper.E. NOTE: on 20060919, Microsoft notified CVE that t... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-4896. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-4785. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-4785. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-4785 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5175. | Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the administrative interface for the TeraStation HD-HTGL firmware 2.05 beta 1 and earlier allows remote attackers to modify configurations or delete arbitrary data via unspecified vectors. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5329. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5470. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-5740. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-5740 due to a typo. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-5740 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5572. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5573. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5575. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5576. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5582. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5682. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5683. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5684. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5685. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5686. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5687. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5688. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5689. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5690. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5691. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5692. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-5693. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.