instruction stringlengths 55 58 | input stringclasses 1
value | output stringlengths 21 4k |
|---|---|---|
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-3733. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-3801. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-3699. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-3699. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-3699 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-3802. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-0447. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-0447. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-0447 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-3894. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-3900. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-3904. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-3915. | Mondo 2.24 has insecure handling of temporary files. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-4015. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-0011. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-0011. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-0011 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-4019. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2930. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2007-2930. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2930 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-4044. | Rejected reason: The MS-RPC functionality in smbd in Samba 3 on SUSE Linux before 20070720 does not include "one character in the shell escape handling." NOTE: this issue was originally characterized as a shell metacharacter issue due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2007-2447, which was interpreted by CVE to be security ... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-4049. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2000-1205. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2000-1205. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2000-1205 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-4168. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-4168. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-4168. It was inadvertently used in a vendor advisory when the "2006" year was intended. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-4168 instead of this candidate. All references and d... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-4274. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-4275. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2007-4275. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-4275 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-4558. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-4134. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-4134. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-4134 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-4576. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-4575. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2007-4575. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-4575 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-4579. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2931. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2007-2931. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2931 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-4721. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6113. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6113. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6113 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-4773. | Systrace before 1.6.0 has insufficient escape policy enforcement. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-4774. | The Linux kernel before 2.4.36-rc1 has a race condition. It was possible to bypass systrace policies by flooding the ptraced process with SIGCONT signals, which can can wake up a PTRACED process. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-4851. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5137. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5137. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5137 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-4989. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-4568. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2007-4568. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-4568 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-5002. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-5021. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-4880. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-4880. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-4880 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-5049. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-3387. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-3387. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-3387 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-5125. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-1171. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-1171. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-1171 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-5284. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5279. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5279. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5279 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-5285. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5280. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5280. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5280 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-5286. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5281. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5281. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5281 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-5287. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5282. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5282. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5282 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-5288. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5283. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5283. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5283 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-5317. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5292. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5292. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5292 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-5324. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2582. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-2582. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2582 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-5336. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5339. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2007-5339. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5339 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-5343. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-5345. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-5346. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-5349. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-5353. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-5354. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-5356. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-5357. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-5421. | Rejected reason: Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in Cisco IOS 12.x and IOS XR allow attackers to execute arbitrary code, as demonstrated via the "Bind Shell", "Reverse Shell", and "Two byte rootshell (Tiny Shell)" attacks. NOTE: the vendor and researcher agree that this issue does not cross privilege boundaries,... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-5499. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-5553. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-4158. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-4158. It was based on a vague pre-advisory, so the duplicate was not detected until more details were provided. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-4158 instead of this candidat... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-5586. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5587. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5587. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5587 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-5645. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-5645. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-5645, due to a typo. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-5645 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidenta... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-5661. | The Macrovision InstallShield InstallScript One-Click Install (OCI) ActiveX control 12.0 before SP2 does not validate the DLL files that are named as parameters to the control, which allows remote attackers to download arbitrary library code onto a client machine. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-5670. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5956. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5956. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5956 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-5743. | viewvc 1.0.3 allows improper access control to files in a repository when using the "forbidden" configuration option. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-5759. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6335. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6335. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6335 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-5763. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-0401. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-0401. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-0401 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-5908. | Rejected reason: Buffer overflow in the (1) sysfs_show_available_clocksources and (2) sysfs_show_current_clocksources functions in Linux kernel 2.6.23 and earlier might allow local users to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code via crafted clock source names. NOTE: follow-on analysis by Linux developers ... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-5967. | A flaw in Mozilla's embedded certificate code might allow web sites to install root certificates on devices without user approval. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-5968. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6313. Reason: this candidate's description and references were inconsistent and described unrelated, non-security issues. The original intended issue is covered by CVE-2007-6313. Notes: All references and descriptions in this candidate have bee... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-6034. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6062. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6062. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6062 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-6070. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-1382. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-1382. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-1382 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-6132. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-6247. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-6256. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-6370. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5583. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5583. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5583 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-6440. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6112. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6112. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6112 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-6442. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6114. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6114. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6114 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-6443. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6115. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6115. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6115 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-6444. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6113. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6113, Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6113 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-6445. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6117. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6117. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6117 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-6446. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6118. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6118. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6118 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-6447. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6114. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6114. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6114 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-6448. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6120. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6120. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6120 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-6449. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6121. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6121. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6121 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-6590. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-2809. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-2809. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-2809 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-6678. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6167. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6167. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6167 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-6745. | clamav 0.91.2 suffers from a floating point exception when using ScanOLE2. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-6747. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-6748. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-6749. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-6758. | Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in feed-proxy.php in extjs 5.0.0. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-6762. | In the Linux kernel before 2.6.20, there is an off-by-one bug in net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c where it is possible to overflow the doi_def->tags[] array. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2007-6763. | SAS Drug Development (SDD) before 32DRG02 mishandles logout actions, which allows a user (who was previously logged in) to access resources by pressing a back or forward button in a web browser. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-0004. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-0030. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-0079. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-0188. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its requester. Further investigation showed that it was not a new security issue. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-0189. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its requester. Further investigation showed that it was not a new security issue. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-0626. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6303. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6303. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6303 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-0627. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6304. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6304. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6304 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-0705. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-0710. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-0885. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-0886. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-0882. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-0882. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-0882 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-0888. | The NEEDBITS macro in the inflate_dynamic function in inflate.c for unzip can be invoked using invalid buffers, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors that trigger a free of uninitialized or previously-freed data. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-0929. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-10001. | A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Pro2col Stingray FTS. The manipulation of the argument Username leads to cross site scripting. The attack may be initiated remotely. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no lon... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-10002. | A vulnerability has been found in cfire24 ajaxlife up to 0.3.2 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. The attack can be initiated remotely. Upgrading to version 0.3.3 is able to address this issue. The patch is identified as 9fb53b67312fe3... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-10003. | A vulnerability was found in iGamingModules flashgames 1.1.0. It has been classified as critical. Affected is an unknown function of the file game.php. The manipulation of the argument lid leads to sql injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The name of the patch is 6e57683704885be32eea2ea614f80c9bb8f0... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-10004. | A vulnerability was found in Email Registration 5.x-2.1 on Drupal. It has been declared as critical. This vulnerability affects the function email_registration_user of the file email_registration.module. The manipulation of the argument namenew leads to sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. Upgrading to ... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-1112. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-0928. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-0928. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-0928 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-1239. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-1271. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-1218. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-1218. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-1218 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-1378. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-2360, CVE-2008-2361, CVE-2008-2362. Reason: This candidate has been withdrawn by its CNA. It was SPLIT into separate candidates before publication. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-2360, CVE-2008-2361, and CVE-2008-2362 instead of... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-1421. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.