id stringlengths 6 9 | text stringlengths 14 8.58k | answer stringclasses 5
values | query stringlengths 856 9.42k | choices list | gold int64 0 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSRCS300 | Mister Delaney and Mister Trauschke, who serve as the representatives of OGE Energy on the Board of Directors, Mister Merrill, who serves as the alternate representative of OGE Energy on the Board of Directors and Mister Prochazka and Mister Rogers, who serve as the representatives of CenterPoint Energy on the Board of Directors do not receive compensation for their service as directors. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Delaney and Mister Trauschke, who serve as the representatives of OGE Energy on the Board of Directors, Mister Merrill, who serves as the alternate representative of OGE Energy on the Board of Directors and Mister Prochazka and Mister Rogers, who serve as the representatives of CenterPoint Energy on the Board of Directors do not receive compensation for their service as directors.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS301 | KG, Tektronix,Inc (a subsidiary of Danaher Corporation), Teradyne,Inc, Test ResearchInc, and Zygo Corporation. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
KG, Tektronix,Inc (a subsidiary of Danaher Corporation), Teradyne,Inc, Test ResearchInc, and Zygo Corporation.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS302 | The property is 100% leased to Barr Laboratories, Inc and guaranteed by its parent company, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited, through September 2020. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The property is 100% leased to Barr Laboratories, Inc and guaranteed by its parent company, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited, through September 2020.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS303 | Other than the impact from production shutdowns during the second quarter, we incurred no other economic loss from the bankruptcy filings of Chrysler or General Motors. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Other than the impact from production shutdowns during the second quarter, we incurred no other economic loss from the bankruptcy filings of Chrysler or General Motors.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS304 | Prior to joining BSQUARE, Mister Gupta provided business and product strategy consulting services to various companies, including Microsoft. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Prior to joining BSQUARE, Mister Gupta provided business and product strategy consulting services to various companies, including Microsoft.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS305 | On September7, 2016, Liberty, through its indirect wholly owned subsidiary Liberty GR Cayman Acquisition Company, entered into two definitive stock purchase agreements relating to the acquisition of Delta Topco, the parent company of Formula1. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
On September7, 2016, Liberty, through its indirect wholly owned subsidiary Liberty GR Cayman Acquisition Company, entered into two definitive stock purchase agreements relating to the acquisition of Delta Topco, the parent company of Formula1.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS306 | Prior tojoining the company hewas recently Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer at Clean Harbors, Inc (NYSE:CLH), a leading provider of environmental, energy and industrial services throughout North America. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Prior tojoining the company hewas recently Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer at Clean Harbors, Inc (NYSE:CLH), a leading provider of environmental, energy and industrial services throughout North America.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS307 | Under our strategic alliance with Amgen, we expect to continue the Phase 3 development of our drug candidate omecamtiv mecarbil for the potential treatment of heart failure. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Under our strategic alliance with Amgen, we expect to continue the Phase 3 development of our drug candidate omecamtiv mecarbil for the potential treatment of heart failure.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS308 | In June 2018, Alabama Power completed an updated decommissioning cost site study for Plant Farley. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In June 2018, Alabama Power completed an updated decommissioning cost site study for Plant Farley.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS309 | We have experienced and expect to continue to experience intense competition from current and future competitors including EMC, IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, and Symantec. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We have experienced and expect to continue to experience intense competition from current and future competitors including EMC, IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, and Symantec.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS310 | Deposits The table below presents the daily average balances of deposits by type and weighted-average rates paid thereon during the years presented: 2003 2002 2001 Average Average Average Average Average Average Balance Rate Paid Balance Rate Paid Balance Rate Paid Non-interest-bearing: Commercial andindividual $ 2,133,906 $ 1,942,228 $ 1,883,931 Correspondentbanks 848,737 553,318 262,840 Publicfunds 55,081 44,886 39,919 Total 3,037,724 2,540,432 2,186,690 Interest-bearing: Private accounts: Savings and Interest-on-Checking 1,052,637 0.09 % 1,003,713 0.18 % 966,429 0.37 % Money market depositaccounts 2,153,489 0.96 1,857,130 1.28 1,825,991 2.63 Time accounts of $100,000 ormore 557,248 1.31 649,920 2.03 718,456 4.57 Time accounts under $100,000 444,333 1.24 505,826 2.28 547,543 4.43 Publicfunds 331,915 0.93 337,289 1.47 306,248 3.26 Total 4,539,622 0.82 4,353,878 1.27 4,364,667 2.72 Totaldeposits $ 7,577,346 0.49 % $ 6,894,310 0.80 % $ 6,551,357 1.81 % Average deposits increased $683.0million in 2003 compared to 2002 and $343.0million in 2002 compared to 2001. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Deposits The table below presents the daily average balances of deposits by type and weighted-average rates paid thereon during the years presented: 2003 2002 2001 Average Average Average Average Average Average Balance Rate Paid Balance Rate Paid Balance Rate Paid Non-interest-bearing: Commercial andindividual $ 2,133,906 $ 1,942,228 $ 1,883,931 Correspondentbanks 848,737 553,318 262,840 Publicfunds 55,081 44,886 39,919 Total 3,037,724 2,540,432 2,186,690 Interest-bearing: Private accounts: Savings and Interest-on-Checking 1,052,637 0.09 % 1,003,713 0.18 % 966,429 0.37 % Money market depositaccounts 2,153,489 0.96 1,857,130 1.28 1,825,991 2.63 Time accounts of $100,000 ormore 557,248 1.31 649,920 2.03 718,456 4.57 Time accounts under $100,000 444,333 1.24 505,826 2.28 547,543 4.43 Publicfunds 331,915 0.93 337,289 1.47 306,248 3.26 Total 4,539,622 0.82 4,353,878 1.27 4,364,667 2.72 Totaldeposits $ 7,577,346 0.49 % $ 6,894,310 0.80 % $ 6,551,357 1.81 % Average deposits increased $683.0million in 2003 compared to 2002 and $343.0million in 2002 compared to 2001.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS311 | Celgene may designate another nominee to replace Doctor Daniel upon Doctor Daniels departure from the Board or as a replacement nominee for election at a meeting of stockholders at which such position is up for election. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Celgene may designate another nominee to replace Doctor Daniel upon Doctor Daniels departure from the Board or as a replacement nominee for election at a meeting of stockholders at which such position is up for election.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS312 | Because we receive royalties one quarter in arrears, the average royalty rate for the payments we receive from Genentech in the second calendar quarterwhich would be for Genentechs sales from the first calendar quarterhas been and is expected to continue to be higher than the average royalty rate for following quarters. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Because we receive royalties one quarter in arrears, the average royalty rate for the payments we receive from Genentech in the second calendar quarterwhich would be for Genentechs sales from the first calendar quarterhas been and is expected to continue to be higher than the average royalty rate for following quarters.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS313 | In June 2008, the Company initiated an arbitration action in Seattle, Washington against VeriSign, Inc, to seek resolution of disputes regarding the proper interpretation of an Alliance Agreement entered into between the parties dating back to 2001. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In June 2008, the Company initiated an arbitration action in Seattle, Washington against VeriSign, Inc, to seek resolution of disputes regarding the proper interpretation of an Alliance Agreement entered into between the parties dating back to 2001.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS314 | Although the market is highly fragmented, especially for conforming mortgage products, chattel financing is consolidating among a few remaining national lenders: 21st Mortgage Corporation, an affiliate of Clayton Homes, Inc and Berkshire Hathaway, Inc; and U.S. Bank Manufactured Housing Finance. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Although the market is highly fragmented, especially for conforming mortgage products, chattel financing is consolidating among a few remaining national lenders: 21st Mortgage Corporation, an affiliate of Clayton Homes, Inc and Berkshire Hathaway, Inc; and U.S. Bank Manufactured Housing Finance.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS315 | As an example, 44% of our billings in 2008 were to Synnex, a master distributor who fulfills demand from other distributors, VARs or end users. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
As an example, 44% of our billings in 2008 were to Synnex, a master distributor who fulfills demand from other distributors, VARs or end users.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS316 | For 2010, three customers of the Display Technologies segment, which individually accounted for more than 10% of segment net sales, accounted for 72% of total segment sales. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
For 2010, three customers of the Display Technologies segment, which individually accounted for more than 10% of segment net sales, accounted for 72% of total segment sales.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS317 | Credit Risk Questar Pipelines largest customers include Questar Gas, PacifiCorp, Anadarko, EOG Resources and Chevron/Texaco. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Credit Risk Questar Pipelines largest customers include Questar Gas, PacifiCorp, Anadarko, EOG Resources and Chevron/Texaco.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS318 | However, we do compete with companies that offer products that target email and data security, continuity and archiving, as well as large providers such as Google Inc and Microsoft Corporation, who offer functions and tools as part of their core mailbox services that may be, or be perceived to be, similar to our offerings. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
However, we do compete with companies that offer products that target email and data security, continuity and archiving, as well as large providers such as Google Inc and Microsoft Corporation, who offer functions and tools as part of their core mailbox services that may be, or be perceived to be, similar to our offerings.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS319 | She currently serves on the board of directors of the American International Group, Inc, a global insurance and financial services company, and the audit committees of the boards of directors of Intuit Inc, a provider of business, financial management and tax solutions and Pfizer Inc, a research-based global pharmaceutical company. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
She currently serves on the board of directors of the American International Group, Inc, a global insurance and financial services company, and the audit committees of the boards of directors of Intuit Inc, a provider of business, financial management and tax solutions and Pfizer Inc, a research-based global pharmaceutical company.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS320 | For advertisers seeking social media and web presence solutions, the RL Platform integrates with leading social media sites, such as Facebook and Twitter. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
For advertisers seeking social media and web presence solutions, the RL Platform integrates with leading social media sites, such as Facebook and Twitter.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS321 | Our Strategy Our long term strategy is focused on three pillars: I Great Products Growing our product line, including an expanded line of our Class 8 ProStar and LoneStar trucks and Class 4/5 TerraStarTM trucks manufactured under the International brand, the AC series of small shuttle buses manufactured under the IC brand, and the Vesta RV manufactured under the Monaco brand Maintain strong market share in our traditional classes, including School bus Class 6 and 7 medium, and Class 8 severe service Focusing on engine research and development in order to have a competitive advantage using Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) and other technologies for compliance with 2010 emissions standards Introducing our advanced engine technology in new markets II Competitive Cost Structure Inceasing our seamless integration of MaxxForce branded engine lines in our products, including the establishment of our new MaxxForce 11, 13 and 15 engines Reducing materials cost by increasing global sourcing, leveraging scale benefits, finding synergies among strategic partnerships, reducing manufacturing conversion costs, and seeking opportunities for vertical integration III Professortable Growth Working in cooperation with the U.S. military to provide an extensive line of defense vehicles and product support, including but not limited to, Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles and other vehicles derived from our existing truck platforms Minimizing the impact of our North American markets cyclicality by growing our Truck and Parts segments and expansion markets sales, such as Mexico, international export, U.S. and non-U.S. military, RV, commercial bus, and commercial step van Broadening our Engine segment customer base within the commercial truck market, other consumer and specialty vehicle products, and other non-vehicle-based platforms The two key enablers to the above strategy are as follows: I Leverage our assets and those of our partners Grow in our North American markets and globally through strategic partnerships and joint ventures, with partners including Mahindra& Mahindra Ltd. for markets in India and Caterpillar Inc (Caterpillar) for various markets outside of North America and the Indian subcontinent, and pending ventures with Anhui Jianghuai Automobile Co. Ltd. (JAC) for markets in China, to increase speed to market, reduce risk, and lower the cost of investment Maintain product and plant flexibility to fully utilize our existing facilities, people, and technologies, including actions such as our recent labor agreement with the United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW) Attain further operating efficiencies and economies of scale through consolidating and centralizing certain facilities and functions, including the pending consolidation of our executive management, certain business operations, and product development at a new world headquarters site in Lisle, Illinois and the planned development of a testing and validation center to be located within our Melrose Park facility, as well as other actions such as the integration of all bus production in a single location Combine global purchasing relationships to achieve scale and sourcing anywhere in the world to contain costs II Control our destiny Control the development process and associated intellectual property of our products Utilize key supplier competencies to reduce costs of components and improve quality Ensure the health and growth of our distribution network to provide our products to key markets Our Operating Segments We operate in four industry segments: Truck, Engine, Parts (collectively called manufacturing operations), and Financial Services, which consists of NFC and our foreign finance operations (collectively called financial services operations). | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Our Strategy Our long term strategy is focused on three pillars: I Great Products Growing our product line, including an expanded line of our Class 8 ProStar and LoneStar trucks and Class 4/5 TerraStarTM trucks manufactured under the International brand, the AC series of small shuttle buses manufactured under the IC brand, and the Vesta RV manufactured under the Monaco brand Maintain strong market share in our traditional classes, including School bus Class 6 and 7 medium, and Class 8 severe service Focusing on engine research and development in order to have a competitive advantage using Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) and other technologies for compliance with 2010 emissions standards Introducing our advanced engine technology in new markets II Competitive Cost Structure Inceasing our seamless integration of MaxxForce branded engine lines in our products, including the establishment of our new MaxxForce 11, 13 and 15 engines Reducing materials cost by increasing global sourcing, leveraging scale benefits, finding synergies among strategic partnerships, reducing manufacturing conversion costs, and seeking opportunities for vertical integration III Professortable Growth Working in cooperation with the U.S. military to provide an extensive line of defense vehicles and product support, including but not limited to, Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles and other vehicles derived from our existing truck platforms Minimizing the impact of our North American markets cyclicality by growing our Truck and Parts segments and expansion markets sales, such as Mexico, international export, U.S. and non-U.S. military, RV, commercial bus, and commercial step van Broadening our Engine segment customer base within the commercial truck market, other consumer and specialty vehicle products, and other non-vehicle-based platforms The two key enablers to the above strategy are as follows: I Leverage our assets and those of our partners Grow in our North American markets and globally through strategic partnerships and joint ventures, with partners including Mahindra& Mahindra Ltd. for markets in India and Caterpillar Inc (Caterpillar) for various markets outside of North America and the Indian subcontinent, and pending ventures with Anhui Jianghuai Automobile Co. Ltd. (JAC) for markets in China, to increase speed to market, reduce risk, and lower the cost of investment Maintain product and plant flexibility to fully utilize our existing facilities, people, and technologies, including actions such as our recent labor agreement with the United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW) Attain further operating efficiencies and economies of scale through consolidating and centralizing certain facilities and functions, including the pending consolidation of our executive management, certain business operations, and product development at a new world headquarters site in Lisle, Illinois and the planned development of a testing and validation center to be located within our Melrose Park facility, as well as other actions such as the integration of all bus production in a single location Combine global purchasing relationships to achieve scale and sourcing anywhere in the world to contain costs II Control our destiny Control the development process and associated intellectual property of our products Utilize key supplier competencies to reduce costs of components and improve quality Ensure the health and growth of our distribution network to provide our products to key markets Our Operating Segments We operate in four industry segments: Truck, Engine, Parts (collectively called manufacturing operations), and Financial Services, which consists of NFC and our foreign finance operations (collectively called financial services operations).
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS322 | In 2014, we continued to partner with several high schools in New Jersey to provide students with introductory classes in automotive technologies and entered into several partnerships with industry including Chrysler, Raytheon, and BMW. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In 2014, we continued to partner with several high schools in New Jersey to provide students with introductory classes in automotive technologies and entered into several partnerships with industry including Chrysler, Raytheon, and BMW.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS323 | We sold all of our holdings in Alltel Corporation common stock in 2006. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We sold all of our holdings in Alltel Corporation common stock in 2006.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS324 | Mister Musser is a director of CompuCom Systems, Inc and Internet Capital Group, Inc and a trustee of Brandywine Realty Trust. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Musser is a director of CompuCom Systems, Inc and Internet Capital Group, Inc and a trustee of Brandywine Realty Trust.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS325 | We have formed such partnerships more recently with Lockheed Martin in the US and Australia, and with Mitsui Engineering and Shipbuilding in Japan. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We have formed such partnerships more recently with Lockheed Martin in the US and Australia, and with Mitsui Engineering and Shipbuilding in Japan.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS326 | Appliance products in the Citrix Repeater family of solutions, including Citrix Branch Repeater (formerly WANScaler) and Citrix Branch Repeater with Windows Server, developed in partnership with Microsoft, can accelerate applications to datacenters and mobile workers. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Appliance products in the Citrix Repeater family of solutions, including Citrix Branch Repeater (formerly WANScaler) and Citrix Branch Repeater with Windows Server, developed in partnership with Microsoft, can accelerate applications to datacenters and mobile workers.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS327 | Competitors in the delivery of goods and services to the U.S. Government and the operation of U.S. Government facilities include Bechtel National, Inc, URS Corporation, CH2M Hill, Inc, Fluor Corporation, Lockheed Martin Corporation, Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc, EnergySolutions, Inc, and Northrop Grumman Corporation. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Competitors in the delivery of goods and services to the U.S. Government and the operation of U.S. Government facilities include Bechtel National, Inc, URS Corporation, CH2M Hill, Inc, Fluor Corporation, Lockheed Martin Corporation, Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc, EnergySolutions, Inc, and Northrop Grumman Corporation.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS328 | Research and development expenses Research and development expenses are expensed as incurred and are primarily comprised of the following types of costs incurred in performing research and development activities: contract services; testing samples and supplies; salaries and benefits; and overhead and occupancy costs. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Research and development expenses Research and development expenses are expensed as incurred and are primarily comprised of the following types of costs incurred in performing research and development activities: contract services; testing samples and supplies; salaries and benefits; and overhead and occupancy costs.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS329 | Competitors include Emergency One, Inc (a subsidiary of Federal Signal Corporation), Kovatch Mobile Equipment Corp. and numerous smaller, regional manufacturers. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Competitors include Emergency One, Inc (a subsidiary of Federal Signal Corporation), Kovatch Mobile Equipment Corp. and numerous smaller, regional manufacturers.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS330 | There is also a public company competitor in the craft segment (A.C. Moore, Arts & Crafts, Inc) that is a rapidly growing regional operator of 81 stores and over $430million in revenues. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
There is also a public company competitor in the craft segment (A.C. Moore, Arts & Crafts, Inc) that is a rapidly growing regional operator of 81 stores and over $430million in revenues.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS331 | Competitors for our products include: Barco, Doremi, GDC, IMAX, MasterImage 3D, NEC, Panavision, QSC Audio Products, Qube Cinema, REALD, Rovi, Sony, Technicolor, USL, and XpanD. Competitors for our services include DTS and Sony. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Competitors for our products include: Barco, Doremi, GDC, IMAX, MasterImage 3D, NEC, Panavision, QSC Audio Products, Qube Cinema, REALD, Rovi, Sony, Technicolor, USL, and XpanD. Competitors for our services include DTS and Sony.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS332 | Incme Taxes Incme taxes as presented herein are calculated on a separate tax return basis, although VMware is included in the consolidated tax return of EMC. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Incme Taxes Incme taxes as presented herein are calculated on a separate tax return basis, although VMware is included in the consolidated tax return of EMC.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS333 | In the portal marketplace, the Company competes with Plumtree Software Inc and portal solutions from major infrastructure providers. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In the portal marketplace, the Company competes with Plumtree Software Inc and portal solutions from major infrastructure providers.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS334 | ITG Single Stock AlgorithmsAccess ATS liquidity while simultaneously using scheduled or opportunistic strategies. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
ITG Single Stock AlgorithmsAccess ATS liquidity while simultaneously using scheduled or opportunistic strategies.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS335 | 94 CON EDISON ANNUAL REPORT 2014 Notes to the Financial Statements Continued Net utility plant reconciliations Target levels reflected in rates were: Transmission and distribution: Yr.1$13,818million; Yr. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
94 CON EDISON ANNUAL REPORT 2014 Notes to the Financial Statements Continued Net utility plant reconciliations Target levels reflected in rates were: Transmission and distribution: Yr.1$13,818million; Yr.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS336 | Prior to joining the Company, Mister Wood was Vice President and Chief Development Officer for the Qdoba Restaurant Corp. (Qdoba), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Jack in the Box Inc, from January 2013 to May 2013.Before joining Qdoba, Mister Wood was Senior Vice President and Chief Development Officer of Dave & Busters Holdings, Inc from June 2006 to December 2012.Additionally, prior to June 2006, among other positions, Mister Wood was Vice President of Restaurant Leasing for Simon Property Group and held various positions at Brinker International, Inc, including Vice President of Development Emerging Concepts and Vice President of Real Estate & Property Development | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Prior to joining the Company, Mister Wood was Vice President and Chief Development Officer for the Qdoba Restaurant Corp. (Qdoba), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Jack in the Box Inc, from January 2013 to May 2013.Before joining Qdoba, Mister Wood was Senior Vice President and Chief Development Officer of Dave & Busters Holdings, Inc from June 2006 to December 2012.Additionally, prior to June 2006, among other positions, Mister Wood was Vice President of Restaurant Leasing for Simon Property Group and held various positions at Brinker International, Inc, including Vice President of Development Emerging Concepts and Vice President of Real Estate & Property Development
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS337 | The estimates CMS Energy and Consumers use may change over time, which could have a material impact on their consolidated financial statements. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The estimates CMS Energy and Consumers use may change over time, which could have a material impact on their consolidated financial statements.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS338 | Mister Johnson is currently a director of Mirati Therapeutics, Inc, a biopharmaceutical company; Heron Therapeutics, Inc, a specialty pharmaceuticals company; and La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company, a biopharmaceutical company. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Johnson is currently a director of Mirati Therapeutics, Inc, a biopharmaceutical company; Heron Therapeutics, Inc, a specialty pharmaceuticals company; and La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company, a biopharmaceutical company.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS339 | Simultaneous with the acquisition, our stock was distributed to a Cendant subsidiary not within the PHH ownership structure and the Company's former fleet and fuel card businesses were retained by PHH. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Simultaneous with the acquisition, our stock was distributed to a Cendant subsidiary not within the PHH ownership structure and the Company's former fleet and fuel card businesses were retained by PHH.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS340 | Our new Network Partners added during the year ended January31, 2015 include Advance Auto Parts, Boston Scientific, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Idaho, Chiquita, Health Alliance Plan in Michigan, Reebok/Adidas and U.S. Roche. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Our new Network Partners added during the year ended January31, 2015 include Advance Auto Parts, Boston Scientific, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Idaho, Chiquita, Health Alliance Plan in Michigan, Reebok/Adidas and U.S. Roche.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS341 | Corporate Highlights We formed three new strategic alliances with Biogen Idec to develop and commercialize antisense drugs for severe and rare and neurologic diseases. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Corporate Highlights We formed three new strategic alliances with Biogen Idec to develop and commercialize antisense drugs for severe and rare and neurologic diseases.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS342 | Mister Carter also currently serves on the board of directors of QLogic Corporation. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Carter also currently serves on the board of directors of QLogic Corporation.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS343 | Open Text and Microsoft Corporation The strategic alliance between Microsoft and Open Text offers improved integration between Microsofts desktop and server products. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Open Text and Microsoft Corporation The strategic alliance between Microsoft and Open Text offers improved integration between Microsofts desktop and server products.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS344 | Our technology partnerships with companies such as Datadog, New Relic, Google Cloud Platform, Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Red Hat, Pivotal and Tableau provide us with significant benefits, including lead generation, new customer acquisition, marketplace fulfillment, accelerated deployment and additional customer support. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Our technology partnerships with companies such as Datadog, New Relic, Google Cloud Platform, Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Red Hat, Pivotal and Tableau provide us with significant benefits, including lead generation, new customer acquisition, marketplace fulfillment, accelerated deployment and additional customer support.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS345 | Mister Fix has served as a director of Flowserve Corporation since 2006 and serves as the Chairman of the Corporate Nominating and Governance Committee and a member of the Audit Committee. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Fix has served as a director of Flowserve Corporation since 2006 and serves as the Chairman of the Corporate Nominating and Governance Committee and a member of the Audit Committee.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS346 | He serves as a Director of Tetra Technologies, Inc (a publicly traded energy services and chemical company), EnCana Corporation (a Canadian publicly traded independent oil and natural gas company) and Agrium, Inc (a Canadian publicly traded agricultural chemicals company) and was a Director of EPCO from 1987 to 1997. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
He serves as a Director of Tetra Technologies, Inc (a publicly traded energy services and chemical company), EnCana Corporation (a Canadian publicly traded independent oil and natural gas company) and Agrium, Inc (a Canadian publicly traded agricultural chemicals company) and was a Director of EPCO from 1987 to 1997.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS347 | For AmBisome, we are encountering significant competition from new products produced by Merck and Pfizer. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
For AmBisome, we are encountering significant competition from new products produced by Merck and Pfizer.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS348 | The Group originates Federal Housing Administration (FHA)-insured, Veterans Administration (VA)-guaranteed mortgages, and Rural Housing Service (RHS)-guaranteed loans that are primarily securitized for issuance of Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) mortgage-backed securities which can be resold to individual or institutional investors in the secondary market. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The Group originates Federal Housing Administration (FHA)-insured, Veterans Administration (VA)-guaranteed mortgages, and Rural Housing Service (RHS)-guaranteed loans that are primarily securitized for issuance of Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) mortgage-backed securities which can be resold to individual or institutional investors in the secondary market.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS349 | Competitors include Kodak Gallery, Shutterfly, Snapfish, Photobucket, Webshots, and to some extent Myspace, Facebook and other social networking sites, as well as the web sites of photo retailers such as Walgreens, Wal-Mart and CVS. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Competitors include Kodak Gallery, Shutterfly, Snapfish, Photobucket, Webshots, and to some extent Myspace, Facebook and other social networking sites, as well as the web sites of photo retailers such as Walgreens, Wal-Mart and CVS.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS350 | Mister Lawrence also serves as a director of Approach Resources, Inc, Crosstex Energy, Inc, Hallador Petroleum Company (each a United States publicly traded company), Winstar Resources Ltd. (a Canadian public company) and certain non-public companies in the energy industry in which Yorktown partnerships hold equity interests. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Lawrence also serves as a director of Approach Resources, Inc, Crosstex Energy, Inc, Hallador Petroleum Company (each a United States publicly traded company), Winstar Resources Ltd. (a Canadian public company) and certain non-public companies in the energy industry in which Yorktown partnerships hold equity interests.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS351 | In January of 2006, the Reduction Act established AMP as the benchmark for prescription drug reimbursement in the Medicaid program, eliminating the previously used AWP standard. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In January of 2006, the Reduction Act established AMP as the benchmark for prescription drug reimbursement in the Medicaid program, eliminating the previously used AWP standard.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS352 | Key partners include: Microsoft, Citrix Systems, Hewlett Packard, IBM, Motorola, CDW, Dell, Insight, Santa Cruz Operation, Sun Microsystems, Toshiba, Atmel and Green Hills Software. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Key partners include: Microsoft, Citrix Systems, Hewlett Packard, IBM, Motorola, CDW, Dell, Insight, Santa Cruz Operation, Sun Microsystems, Toshiba, Atmel and Green Hills Software.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS353 | 4 Acquisition of Sealy On September 27, 2012, we announced we had entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (Merger Agreement) to acquire Sealy Corporation (Sealy), by merging Sealy with a newly-formed subsidiary of the Company (the Merger) (collectively, the Sealy Acquisition). | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
4 Acquisition of Sealy On September 27, 2012, we announced we had entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (Merger Agreement) to acquire Sealy Corporation (Sealy), by merging Sealy with a newly-formed subsidiary of the Company (the Merger) (collectively, the Sealy Acquisition).
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS354 | As a result, Google may unexpectedly penalize our app install interstitials, which may cause links to our mobile website to be featured less prominently in Googles mobile search results page, and traffic to both our mobile website and mobile app may be harmed as a result. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
As a result, Google may unexpectedly penalize our app install interstitials, which may cause links to our mobile website to be featured less prominently in Googles mobile search results page, and traffic to both our mobile website and mobile app may be harmed as a result.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS355 | These financial, as well as physical hedges, represented approximately 27% of our produced gas sales volumes for the twelve months ended December31, 2006 at an average price of $7.42 per Mcf. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
These financial, as well as physical hedges, represented approximately 27% of our produced gas sales volumes for the twelve months ended December31, 2006 at an average price of $7.42 per Mcf.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS356 | Money SDM Bank Our key partnerships and integrations in CIS: Kazkommertsbank Kazkommertsbank Tajikistan Kyrgyzkommertsbank AGBank - Azerbaijan Our key partnerships and integrations in Europe, Asia and United States include: Latvijas Pasta Banka Payvision Rietumu Bank Astropay Wirecard Bank Masapay Skrill PPRO Authorize.net Ingenico Paysafe Apple Pay As an example of processing an electronic payment, the below diagram illustrates the participants involved in a payment transaction. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Money SDM Bank Our key partnerships and integrations in CIS: Kazkommertsbank Kazkommertsbank Tajikistan Kyrgyzkommertsbank AGBank - Azerbaijan Our key partnerships and integrations in Europe, Asia and United States include: Latvijas Pasta Banka Payvision Rietumu Bank Astropay Wirecard Bank Masapay Skrill PPRO Authorize.net Ingenico Paysafe Apple Pay As an example of processing an electronic payment, the below diagram illustrates the participants involved in a payment transaction.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS357 | Mister Gold was President and CEO of CryoVascular Systems, a peripheral vascular disease device company, from 2001 until its acquisition by Boston Scientific. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Gold was President and CEO of CryoVascular Systems, a peripheral vascular disease device company, from 2001 until its acquisition by Boston Scientific.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS358 | On November 15, 2006, we completed the acquisition of Radiologix, Inc Radiologix, a Delaware corporation, then employing approximately 2,200 people, through its subsidiaries, was a national provider of diagnostic imaging services through the ownership and operation of freestanding, outpatient diagnostic imaging centers. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
On November 15, 2006, we completed the acquisition of Radiologix, Inc Radiologix, a Delaware corporation, then employing approximately 2,200 people, through its subsidiaries, was a national provider of diagnostic imaging services through the ownership and operation of freestanding, outpatient diagnostic imaging centers.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS359 | In the space launch vehicle structures area, the Company is under contract with Boeing to produce composite structures for its Delta II, III and IV family of expendable launch vehicles. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In the space launch vehicle structures area, the Company is under contract with Boeing to produce composite structures for its Delta II, III and IV family of expendable launch vehicles.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS360 | Globally, our most significant competition is from Time Warners America Online business (AOL or America Online), GoogleInc (Google) and Microsoft. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Globally, our most significant competition is from Time Warners America Online business (AOL or America Online), GoogleInc (Google) and Microsoft.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS361 | These competitors include Agilysys, Softbrands, Multi-Systems, Northwind, Newmarket (sales and catering product only), Amadeus Hospitality, Par Technology, and Protel. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
These competitors include Agilysys, Softbrands, Multi-Systems, Northwind, Newmarket (sales and catering product only), Amadeus Hospitality, Par Technology, and Protel.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS362 | Our 2008 average realized natural gas price was $8.39 per Mcf, 16% higher than the 2007 average realized price of $7.23 per Mcf. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Our 2008 average realized natural gas price was $8.39 per Mcf, 16% higher than the 2007 average realized price of $7.23 per Mcf.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS363 | We build comprehensive solutions directly on the Oracle Content Database infrastructure using new Oracle Fusion technology. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We build comprehensive solutions directly on the Oracle Content Database infrastructure using new Oracle Fusion technology.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS364 | National Rural currently services all of the rural utilities loans in Farmer Macs portfolio. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
National Rural currently services all of the rural utilities loans in Farmer Macs portfolio.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS365 | The molding process occurs by reacting monomeric diphenylmethanediisocyanate (MDI) with polyol and other chemicals. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The molding process occurs by reacting monomeric diphenylmethanediisocyanate (MDI) with polyol and other chemicals.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS366 | Miss Rafael currently serves on the board of directors of Echelon Corporation. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Miss Rafael currently serves on the board of directors of Echelon Corporation.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS367 | The entries of Microsoft, Oracle Java and OpenStack are important precursors for the adoption of ARM 64-bit servers in the enterprise market. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The entries of Microsoft, Oracle Java and OpenStack are important precursors for the adoption of ARM 64-bit servers in the enterprise market.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS368 | Formerly, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Bell Systems (a provider of vertical takeoff and landing aircraft, provider of advanced technology solutions to global defense and aerospace industries, and designer and manufacturer of reciprocating piston aircraft engines) (a business segment of Textron, Inc) from October2003 to March2005; Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Intelligence and Information Systems Division, Ratheon Company (a defense and aerospace systems supplier) from April 2003 to September2003; Controller, Intelligence and Information Systems Division, Ratheon Company from October2002 to March2003; Chief Financial Officer, Tactical Systems Business Unit, Ratheon Company from January2000 to September2002. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Formerly, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Bell Systems (a provider of vertical takeoff and landing aircraft, provider of advanced technology solutions to global defense and aerospace industries, and designer and manufacturer of reciprocating piston aircraft engines) (a business segment of Textron, Inc) from October2003 to March2005; Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Intelligence and Information Systems Division, Ratheon Company (a defense and aerospace systems supplier) from April 2003 to September2003; Controller, Intelligence and Information Systems Division, Ratheon Company from October2002 to March2003; Chief Financial Officer, Tactical Systems Business Unit, Ratheon Company from January2000 to September2002.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS369 | Competition Other companies that have oral drug delivery technologies competitive with the AcuForm technology include Bristol-Myers Squibb, IVAX Corporation, ALZA Corporation (a subsidiary of Johnson& Johnson), SkyePharma plc, Biovail Corporation, Flamel Technologies S.A., Ranbaxy Laboratories, Ltd., Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Intec Pharma and Alpharma, Inc, all of which develop oral tablet products designed to release the incorporated drugs over time. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Competition Other companies that have oral drug delivery technologies competitive with the AcuForm technology include Bristol-Myers Squibb, IVAX Corporation, ALZA Corporation (a subsidiary of Johnson& Johnson), SkyePharma plc, Biovail Corporation, Flamel Technologies S.A., Ranbaxy Laboratories, Ltd., Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Intec Pharma and Alpharma, Inc, all of which develop oral tablet products designed to release the incorporated drugs over time.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS370 | 7) Loews is the parent company of BPHC and may, therefore, be deemed to beneficially own the units held by BPHC. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
7) Loews is the parent company of BPHC and may, therefore, be deemed to beneficially own the units held by BPHC.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS371 | Business acquisitions Acquisition of Mt. Holly aluminum smelter On October 23, 2014, Berkeley entered into a stock purchase agreement (the "Stock Purchase Agreement") with Alumax Inc ("Alumax"), a wholly owned subsidiary of Alcoa, to acquire Alcoas 50.3% stake in Mt. Holly. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Business acquisitions Acquisition of Mt. Holly aluminum smelter On October 23, 2014, Berkeley entered into a stock purchase agreement (the "Stock Purchase Agreement") with Alumax Inc ("Alumax"), a wholly owned subsidiary of Alcoa, to acquire Alcoas 50.3% stake in Mt. Holly.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS372 | On March3, 2011, we were notified by the Listing Qualifications Staff of Nasdaq (the Staff) that we were not in compliance with the minimum bid requirement set forth in Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5550(a)(2) (the Bid Price Requirement) because the bid price for our common stock had closed below the minimum $1.00 per share requirement for 30 consecutive business days. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
On March3, 2011, we were notified by the Listing Qualifications Staff of Nasdaq (the Staff) that we were not in compliance with the minimum bid requirement set forth in Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5550(a)(2) (the Bid Price Requirement) because the bid price for our common stock had closed below the minimum $1.00 per share requirement for 30 consecutive business days.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS373 | Our current and recent relationships include, but are not limited to, the following: Lockheed Martin, with which we have several project teaming agreements and license agreements dating back to 2004. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Our current and recent relationships include, but are not limited to, the following: Lockheed Martin, with which we have several project teaming agreements and license agreements dating back to 2004.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS374 | These include Citrix Systems, Inc, Radware Ltd., and a number of other competitors that have a smaller market presence or limited feature set, such as: A10 Networks, Amazon Web Services, Microsoft, Array Networks, Inc, Avi Networks, Barracuda Networks, Inc, NGINX, HA Proxy, and Kemp Technologies. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
These include Citrix Systems, Inc, Radware Ltd., and a number of other competitors that have a smaller market presence or limited feature set, such as: A10 Networks, Amazon Web Services, Microsoft, Array Networks, Inc, Avi Networks, Barracuda Networks, Inc, NGINX, HA Proxy, and Kemp Technologies.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS375 | As of December 31, 2008, our channel partners included McKesson, Cerner, Siemens Medical, Sunquest, QuadraMed, GE Medical Systems, Digi-trax Corporation, Omnitech, Orchard Software, BarcodesWest, CaridianBCT, Keane, CPSI, Fresenius Kabi and Biomedical Synergies, Inc, among others. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
As of December 31, 2008, our channel partners included McKesson, Cerner, Siemens Medical, Sunquest, QuadraMed, GE Medical Systems, Digi-trax Corporation, Omnitech, Orchard Software, BarcodesWest, CaridianBCT, Keane, CPSI, Fresenius Kabi and Biomedical Synergies, Inc, among others.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS376 | The Hardware Acquisition includes the purchase of shares and assets of certain subsidiaries of Stanley Black & Decker involved in the HHI Business. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The Hardware Acquisition includes the purchase of shares and assets of certain subsidiaries of Stanley Black & Decker involved in the HHI Business.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS377 | No payouts would be earned if TSR were at less than the 33rd percentile and no payouts would exceed 150% of the target award. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
No payouts would be earned if TSR were at less than the 33rd percentile and no payouts would exceed 150% of the target award.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS378 | Before that position, Mister Johnson had been Senior Vice President, Microsoft Americas since February 2002 and Senior Vice President, U.S.Sales, Marketing, and Services since August 2000. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Before that position, Mister Johnson had been Senior Vice President, Microsoft Americas since February 2002 and Senior Vice President, U.S.Sales, Marketing, and Services since August 2000.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS379 | On October 14, 2004, ACC, Northwest Steel Company, a wholly-owned Nevada subsidiary of ACC (Merger Sub), and General Steel Investment Co., Ltd., a British Virgin Islands company (General Steel Investment) entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger pursuant to which ACC acquired General Steel Investment through a merger between Merger Sub and General Steel Investment and then merger of Merger Sub with ACC, and its 70% ownership in its subsidiary Tianjin Daqiuzhuang Metal Sheet Co., Ltd., a Chinese company of limited liability (Daqiuzhuang Metal) in exchange for shares of ACCs common stock. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
On October 14, 2004, ACC, Northwest Steel Company, a wholly-owned Nevada subsidiary of ACC (Merger Sub), and General Steel Investment Co., Ltd., a British Virgin Islands company (General Steel Investment) entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger pursuant to which ACC acquired General Steel Investment through a merger between Merger Sub and General Steel Investment and then merger of Merger Sub with ACC, and its 70% ownership in its subsidiary Tianjin Daqiuzhuang Metal Sheet Co., Ltd., a Chinese company of limited liability (Daqiuzhuang Metal) in exchange for shares of ACCs common stock.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS380 | The results of operations for our wholly owned subsidiary, Interface Systems, Inc, have been included commencing September 1, 2000, the effective date of its acquisition. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The results of operations for our wholly owned subsidiary, Interface Systems, Inc, have been included commencing September 1, 2000, the effective date of its acquisition.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS381 | Incuded in our net loss for the year ended March 31, 2005 were the following items before the effect of income taxes: a write down of $5,123,000 of the carrying value of expendable Boeing 737 inventory and losses on sales of assets of $85,000 which was partially offset by and non-cash mark to market gain on fuel hedges of $2,837,000. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Incuded in our net loss for the year ended March 31, 2005 were the following items before the effect of income taxes: a write down of $5,123,000 of the carrying value of expendable Boeing 737 inventory and losses on sales of assets of $85,000 which was partially offset by and non-cash mark to market gain on fuel hedges of $2,837,000.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS382 | First National Security Company The Company completed its merger with FNSC and its accompanying acquisition of FNSCs subsidiaries, including First National and Heritage Bank, on June 13, 2014. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
First National Security Company The Company completed its merger with FNSC and its accompanying acquisition of FNSCs subsidiaries, including First National and Heritage Bank, on June 13, 2014.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS383 | In addition to the Rockwell Automation board, Mister Davis serves on the boards of Illinois Tool Works, Apogent Technologies, and Ingram Micro. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In addition to the Rockwell Automation board, Mister Davis serves on the boards of Illinois Tool Works, Apogent Technologies, and Ingram Micro.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS384 | Non-maturity deposits, such as NOW, savings and money market accounts are spread over various time periods based on the expected sensitivity of these rates considering liquidity and the investment preferences of the Corporation. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Non-maturity deposits, such as NOW, savings and money market accounts are spread over various time periods based on the expected sensitivity of these rates considering liquidity and the investment preferences of the Corporation.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS385 | Our collaborative relationships with PepsiCo, Inc, Anheuser-Busch InBev, Tingyi Holding Corp., Arla Foods and others for our global ready-to-drink beverage businesses in this segment are excluded from the Global Coffee Alliance. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Our collaborative relationships with PepsiCo, Inc, Anheuser-Busch InBev, Tingyi Holding Corp., Arla Foods and others for our global ready-to-drink beverage businesses in this segment are excluded from the Global Coffee Alliance.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS386 | Because a substantial portion of our revenues for the foreseeable future will depend on achieving development and other pre-commercialization milestones under our strategic alliance with Amgen, our results of operations may vary substantially from year to year. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Because a substantial portion of our revenues for the foreseeable future will depend on achieving development and other pre-commercialization milestones under our strategic alliance with Amgen, our results of operations may vary substantially from year to year.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS387 | In the small household appliance category, our key competitors in the United States and Canada include Conair Corporation, DeLonghi America, Metro Thebe, Inc, d/b/a HWI Breville, NACCO Industries, Inc (Hamilton Beach), Inc, Salton, Inc and Whirlpool Corporation. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In the small household appliance category, our key competitors in the United States and Canada include Conair Corporation, DeLonghi America, Metro Thebe, Inc, d/b/a HWI Breville, NACCO Industries, Inc (Hamilton Beach), Inc, Salton, Inc and Whirlpool Corporation.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS388 | We compete directly with national staffing services providers, such as Kelly Services, Inc Robert Half International, Inc, MPS Group, Labor Ready, Inc, Manpower, Inc, Randstad Group and Spherion Corporation and national PEO service providers, such as Administaff, Inc, Automatic Data Processing, Inc, Gevity HR, Inc, Oasis Outsourcing and Strategic Outsourcing Inc We also face competition from information technology outsourcing firms and broad-based outsourcing and consulting firms that perform individual projects, such as TeleTech Holdings Inc Competition within the industry is based on many factors. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We compete directly with national staffing services providers, such as Kelly Services, Inc Robert Half International, Inc, MPS Group, Labor Ready, Inc, Manpower, Inc, Randstad Group and Spherion Corporation and national PEO service providers, such as Administaff, Inc, Automatic Data Processing, Inc, Gevity HR, Inc, Oasis Outsourcing and Strategic Outsourcing Inc We also face competition from information technology outsourcing firms and broad-based outsourcing and consulting firms that perform individual projects, such as TeleTech Holdings Inc Competition within the industry is based on many factors.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS389 | Our competitors in various market segments include Thales, Xerox, Kapsch,Imtech, Accenture,IBM,Indra, Siemens, Transcore, Trapeze and Scheidt& Bachmann. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Our competitors in various market segments include Thales, Xerox, Kapsch,Imtech, Accenture,IBM,Indra, Siemens, Transcore, Trapeze and Scheidt& Bachmann.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS390 | 2012 2011 2010 Other non-interest income: Other $ 30,703 $ 26,370 $ 28,744 Total $ 30,703 $ 26,370 $ 28,744 Other non-interest expense: Advertising, promotions and public relations $ 23,773 $ 22,584 $ 15,087 Legal and other professional fees 22,341 19,802 20,792 Travel/meals and entertainment 13,049 11,493 10,350 Visa check card expense 8,940 8,214 7,048 Other 71,366 75,500 70,930 Total $ 139,469 $ 137,593 $ 124,207 Note 13 - Incme Taxes Incme tax expense was as follows: 2012 2011 2010 Current income tax expense $ 76,928 $ 60,533 $ 52,932 Deferred income tax expense (benefit) (6,405 ) 8,167 4,644 Incme tax expense, as reported $ 70,523 $ 68,700 $ 57,576 Reported income tax expense differed from the amounts computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate of 35% to income before income taxes as follows: 2012 2011 2010 Incme tax expense computed at the statutory rate $ 107,966 $ 100,182 $ 93,219 Effect of tax-exempt interest (36,543 ) (35,741 ) (34,355 ) Bank owned life insurance income (1,413 ) (1,416 ) (1,581 ) Accrual adjustment for premium amortization on municipal securities - 4,146 - Other 513 1,529 293 Incme tax expense, as reported $ 70,523 $ 68,700 $ 57,576 Incme tax expense for 2011 included the correction of an under-accrual of taxes that resulted from incorrectly deducting premium amortization on municipal securities for federal income tax purposes since 2008. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
2012 2011 2010 Other non-interest income: Other $ 30,703 $ 26,370 $ 28,744 Total $ 30,703 $ 26,370 $ 28,744 Other non-interest expense: Advertising, promotions and public relations $ 23,773 $ 22,584 $ 15,087 Legal and other professional fees 22,341 19,802 20,792 Travel/meals and entertainment 13,049 11,493 10,350 Visa check card expense 8,940 8,214 7,048 Other 71,366 75,500 70,930 Total $ 139,469 $ 137,593 $ 124,207 Note 13 - Incme Taxes Incme tax expense was as follows: 2012 2011 2010 Current income tax expense $ 76,928 $ 60,533 $ 52,932 Deferred income tax expense (benefit) (6,405 ) 8,167 4,644 Incme tax expense, as reported $ 70,523 $ 68,700 $ 57,576 Reported income tax expense differed from the amounts computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate of 35% to income before income taxes as follows: 2012 2011 2010 Incme tax expense computed at the statutory rate $ 107,966 $ 100,182 $ 93,219 Effect of tax-exempt interest (36,543 ) (35,741 ) (34,355 ) Bank owned life insurance income (1,413 ) (1,416 ) (1,581 ) Accrual adjustment for premium amortization on municipal securities - 4,146 - Other 513 1,529 293 Incme tax expense, as reported $ 70,523 $ 68,700 $ 57,576 Incme tax expense for 2011 included the correction of an under-accrual of taxes that resulted from incorrectly deducting premium amortization on municipal securities for federal income tax purposes since 2008.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS391 | In January 2010, we announced an expansion of our collaboration with Cisco and VMware, including a cooperative support arrangement, and in October 2010, we expanded our relationship with Fujitsu Technology Solutions. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In January 2010, we announced an expansion of our collaboration with Cisco and VMware, including a cooperative support arrangement, and in October 2010, we expanded our relationship with Fujitsu Technology Solutions.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS392 | The performance period for 125,280 PSUs issued in 2018 was January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2020, and the performance factors for these PSUs are Return on Invested Capital ("ROIC"), Total Shareholder Return ("TSR") compared to the S&P/TSX Capped Industrial Index, and TSR compared to S&P 1500 Road and Rail Index. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The performance period for 125,280 PSUs issued in 2018 was January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2020, and the performance factors for these PSUs are Return on Invested Capital ("ROIC"), Total Shareholder Return ("TSR") compared to the S&P/TSX Capped Industrial Index, and TSR compared to S&P 1500 Road and Rail Index.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS393 | Mister Zarrilli is a director and Chairman of the Audit Committee of NutriSystem, Inc and a director of Virtus Investment Partners, Inc Mister McGroarty joined Safeguard as Vice President and Corporate Controller in December 2005, subsequently became Vice President Finance and Corporate Controller, and served as Senior Vice President Finance from November 2012 until his promotion to Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in April 2013. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Zarrilli is a director and Chairman of the Audit Committee of NutriSystem, Inc and a director of Virtus Investment Partners, Inc Mister McGroarty joined Safeguard as Vice President and Corporate Controller in December 2005, subsequently became Vice President Finance and Corporate Controller, and served as Senior Vice President Finance from November 2012 until his promotion to Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in April 2013.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS394 | Additional recent new competitors also include traditional third party solar finance companies such as SunRun. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Additional recent new competitors also include traditional third party solar finance companies such as SunRun.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS395 | In 2017, for example, we disposed of our Yelp Eat24 food ordering business and entered into a long-term, strategic partnership with Grubhub in its place, which we believe will improve our per-order profitability in addition to providing significantly more options to consumers when fully implemented. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In 2017, for example, we disposed of our Yelp Eat24 food ordering business and entered into a long-term, strategic partnership with Grubhub in its place, which we believe will improve our per-order profitability in addition to providing significantly more options to consumers when fully implemented.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS396 | We reimburse Holly for direct expenses that Holly or its affiliates incurs on our behalf for the employees of HLS | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We reimburse Holly for direct expenses that Holly or its affiliates incurs on our behalf for the employees of HLS
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS397 | Market For Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Market Prices and Dividends As of January25, 2012, the Common Stock of Financial is traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market LLC (NASDAQ) under the symbol BOTJ. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Market For Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Market Prices and Dividends As of January25, 2012, the Common Stock of Financial is traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market LLC (NASDAQ) under the symbol BOTJ.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS398 | Mister Enloe currently serves as a director of Live Nation, Inc, a venue operator, promoter and producer of live entertainment events, and he was previously a director of Silicon Laboratories Inc, a designer of mixed-signal integrated circuits. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Enloe currently serves as a director of Live Nation, Inc, a venue operator, promoter and producer of live entertainment events, and he was previously a director of Silicon Laboratories Inc, a designer of mixed-signal integrated circuits.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS399 | Mister Kannappan formerly served as a member of the Board of Directors at Mattson Technology, Inc (Mattson), a supplier of advanced process equipment for the semiconductor industry, from 1998 until May 2016 when Mattson was acquired by a private equity firm. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Kannappan formerly served as a member of the Board of Directors at Mattson Technology, Inc (Mattson), a supplier of advanced process equipment for the semiconductor industry, from 1998 until May 2016 when Mattson was acquired by a private equity firm.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.