id stringlengths 6 9 | text stringlengths 14 8.58k | answer stringclasses 5
values | query stringlengths 856 9.42k | choices list | gold int64 0 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSRCS700 | Each outstanding share of our common stock was converted into 0.1664 shares of CenturyLink common stock, with cash paid in lieu of fractional shares. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Each outstanding share of our common stock was converted into 0.1664 shares of CenturyLink common stock, with cash paid in lieu of fractional shares.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS701 | Mister Kahane has served as a director of Global Net Lease, Inc (GNL) since February 2015, including as executive chairman from February 2015 until March 2015. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Kahane has served as a director of Global Net Lease, Inc (GNL) since February 2015, including as executive chairman from February 2015 until March 2015.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS702 | The ATG gross profit increased approximately $1,765,000.Inceased sales revenue and cost containment activities for ATG products are primarily the reasons for the increase in gross profit at the ATG. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The ATG gross profit increased approximately $1,765,000.Inceased sales revenue and cost containment activities for ATG products are primarily the reasons for the increase in gross profit at the ATG.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS703 | Saucony sales outside of the U.S. are included in Stride Rite International and the remaining business is included in Saucony. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Saucony sales outside of the U.S. are included in Stride Rite International and the remaining business is included in Saucony.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS704 | On November1, 2010, MetLife, Inc completed the acquisition of American Life Insurance Company (American Life) from AM Holdings LLC (formerly known as ALICO Holdings LLC), a subsidiary of American International Group, Inc (AIG), and Delaware American Life Insurance Company (DelAm) from AIG (American Life, together with DelAm, collectively, ALICO) (the ALICO Acquisition). | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
On November1, 2010, MetLife, Inc completed the acquisition of American Life Insurance Company (American Life) from AM Holdings LLC (formerly known as ALICO Holdings LLC), a subsidiary of American International Group, Inc (AIG), and Delaware American Life Insurance Company (DelAm) from AIG (American Life, together with DelAm, collectively, ALICO) (the ALICO Acquisition).
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS705 | PMSIs primary competitors include Concentra Operating Corporation, Fiserv Health, Medical Services Company, Cypress Medical Products and Progressive Medical, Inc Intellectual Property We use a number of trademarks and service marks. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
PMSIs primary competitors include Concentra Operating Corporation, Fiserv Health, Medical Services Company, Cypress Medical Products and Progressive Medical, Inc Intellectual Property We use a number of trademarks and service marks.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS706 | Additionally, several companies, such as Medarex, Inc, Amgen, Inc, Agensys, Inc, and Genentech, Inc, are actively involved in the research and development of monoclonal antibody-based cancer therapies. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Additionally, several companies, such as Medarex, Inc, Amgen, Inc, Agensys, Inc, and Genentech, Inc, are actively involved in the research and development of monoclonal antibody-based cancer therapies.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS707 | v. Mobile Gas Service Corp, et al. ( | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
v. Mobile Gas Service Corp, et al. (
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS708 | In August 2013, we acquired a40%ownership interest in the U.S. portion of the Express-Platte crude oil pipeline system (Express US) and a100%ownership interest in the Canadian portion of the pipeline system (Express Canada) (collectively, Express-Platte) from subsidiaries of Spectra Energy (the Express-Platte acquisition). | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In August 2013, we acquired a40%ownership interest in the U.S. portion of the Express-Platte crude oil pipeline system (Express US) and a100%ownership interest in the Canadian portion of the pipeline system (Express Canada) (collectively, Express-Platte) from subsidiaries of Spectra Energy (the Express-Platte acquisition).
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS709 | Mister Higdon has also been a Director of HealthSouth Corporation since 2004 and a Director of Citizens Financial Group, Inc since September 2014. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Higdon has also been a Director of HealthSouth Corporation since 2004 and a Director of Citizens Financial Group, Inc since September 2014.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS710 | On November1, 2013, the Company completed the acquisition of FVNB Corp. and its wholly owned subsidiary, First Victoria National Bank (collectively, FVNB) headquartered in Victoria, Texas. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
On November1, 2013, the Company completed the acquisition of FVNB Corp. and its wholly owned subsidiary, First Victoria National Bank (collectively, FVNB) headquartered in Victoria, Texas.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS711 | Mister Reed is also a Director of and Chairman of the Audit Committee of First National Nebraska,Inc and a Director of, and a member of the Audit, Nominating, Investment and Compensation committees of Investors Real Estate Trust, a real estate investment trust. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Reed is also a Director of and Chairman of the Audit Committee of First National Nebraska,Inc and a Director of, and a member of the Audit, Nominating, Investment and Compensation committees of Investors Real Estate Trust, a real estate investment trust.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS712 | The PanAmSat Acquisition Transactions On August28, 2005, Intelsat (Bermuda), Ltd. (Intelsat Bermuda), our direct wholly-owned subsidiary now known as Intelsat (Luxembourg) S.A., PanAmSat and Proton Acquisition Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intelsat Bermuda, signed a definitive merger agreement pursuant to which Intelsat Bermuda acquired all of the outstanding equity interests in PanAmSat for $25.00 per common share in cash, or approximately $3.2 billion in the aggregate (plus approximately $0.00927 per share as the pro rata share of undeclared regular quarterly dividends). | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The PanAmSat Acquisition Transactions On August28, 2005, Intelsat (Bermuda), Ltd. (Intelsat Bermuda), our direct wholly-owned subsidiary now known as Intelsat (Luxembourg) S.A., PanAmSat and Proton Acquisition Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intelsat Bermuda, signed a definitive merger agreement pursuant to which Intelsat Bermuda acquired all of the outstanding equity interests in PanAmSat for $25.00 per common share in cash, or approximately $3.2 billion in the aggregate (plus approximately $0.00927 per share as the pro rata share of undeclared regular quarterly dividends).
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS713 | We have various agreements with other loyalty partners, including hotels and car rental companies, that allow their Customers to earn TrueBlue points through participation in our partners programs. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We have various agreements with other loyalty partners, including hotels and car rental companies, that allow their Customers to earn TrueBlue points through participation in our partners programs.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS714 | Competitors with our embedded components products include Frequency Electronics,Inc, Trimble Navigation, Ltd., MicroSemi, Inc, and Semtech Corporation. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Competitors with our embedded components products include Frequency Electronics,Inc, Trimble Navigation, Ltd., MicroSemi, Inc, and Semtech Corporation.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS715 | She is a director of Tyler Technologies, Inc, serving on the nominating and governance committee and as the chair of the audit committee. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
She is a director of Tyler Technologies, Inc, serving on the nominating and governance committee and as the chair of the audit committee.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS716 | On August 4, 2011, we completed our acquisition of Hypercom, a provider of electronic payment solutions and value-added services at the point of transaction, by means of a merger of one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries with and into Hypercom such that Hypercom became a wholly-owned subsidiary of VeriFone following the merger. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
On August 4, 2011, we completed our acquisition of Hypercom, a provider of electronic payment solutions and value-added services at the point of transaction, by means of a merger of one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries with and into Hypercom such that Hypercom became a wholly-owned subsidiary of VeriFone following the merger.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS717 | During 2004 SCANA recorded a net increase of approximately 20,300 regulated gas customers, increasing its regulated gas customers to approximately 691,000. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
During 2004 SCANA recorded a net increase of approximately 20,300 regulated gas customers, increasing its regulated gas customers to approximately 691,000.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS718 | On July1, 2004, Sky Financial acquired Second Bancorp Incrporated (Second Bancorp), a $2.0 billion bank holding company headquartered in Warren, Ohio, and its wholly-owned subsidiary Second National Bank of Warren by acquiring all of the outstanding capital stock of Second Bancorp for an aggregate purchase price of $312,738, including direct acquisition costs of $2,093. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
On July1, 2004, Sky Financial acquired Second Bancorp Incrporated (Second Bancorp), a $2.0 billion bank holding company headquartered in Warren, Ohio, and its wholly-owned subsidiary Second National Bank of Warren by acquiring all of the outstanding capital stock of Second Bancorp for an aggregate purchase price of $312,738, including direct acquisition costs of $2,093.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS719 | On September28, 2010 (the"Merger Date"), Biovail completed the acquisition of Valeant Pharmaceuticals International ("Valeant") through a wholly-owned subsidiary pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June20, 2010, with Valeant surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Biovail (the"Merger"). | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
On September28, 2010 (the"Merger Date"), Biovail completed the acquisition of Valeant Pharmaceuticals International ("Valeant") through a wholly-owned subsidiary pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June20, 2010, with Valeant surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Biovail (the"Merger").
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS720 | To obtain the full benefit of the applicable deferred tax asset attributable to NOLs,FirstBank and its pass-through entities must have sufficient taxable income within the applicable carry forward period (7 years for taxable years beginning before January 1, 2005, 12 years for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2004 and before January 1, 2013, and 10 years for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012).The Bank incurred all of its NOLs on or after 2009. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
To obtain the full benefit of the applicable deferred tax asset attributable to NOLs,FirstBank and its pass-through entities must have sufficient taxable income within the applicable carry forward period (7 years for taxable years beginning before January 1, 2005, 12 years for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2004 and before January 1, 2013, and 10 years for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012).The Bank incurred all of its NOLs on or after 2009.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS721 | During 2016, we added a partnership agreement with Citibank to convert Citi ThankYouRewards points into TrueBlue points. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
During 2016, we added a partnership agreement with Citibank to convert Citi ThankYouRewards points into TrueBlue points.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS722 | Our strategic partnerships with ADP and Wellpoint have allowed us to access new customers and to write attractive business in an efficient manner. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Our strategic partnerships with ADP and Wellpoint have allowed us to access new customers and to write attractive business in an efficient manner.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS723 | The biotechnology and biopharmaceutical industries are highly competitive, and this competition comes from both biotechnology firms and from major pharmaceutical companies, including : Aduro Biotech, Agenus Inc, Bionovo Inc, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene Corporation, Celldex Therapeutics, Dendreon Corporation, Inovio Pharmaceutical Inc, Oncolytics Biotech Inc, Oncothyreon Inc, et al., | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The biotechnology and biopharmaceutical industries are highly competitive, and this competition comes from both biotechnology firms and from major pharmaceutical companies, including : Aduro Biotech, Agenus Inc, Bionovo Inc, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene Corporation, Celldex Therapeutics, Dendreon Corporation, Inovio Pharmaceutical Inc, Oncolytics Biotech Inc, Oncothyreon Inc, et al.,
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS724 | On April 28, 2014, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement) with Loton Acquisition Sub I, Inc, a Delaware corporation and our wholly owned subsidiary (Acquisition Sub), and KOKO (Camden) Holdings (US), Inc (KOKO Parent), a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of JJAT Corp. (JJAT), a Delaware corporation wholly-owned by Mister Ellin and his affiliates. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
On April 28, 2014, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement) with Loton Acquisition Sub I, Inc, a Delaware corporation and our wholly owned subsidiary (Acquisition Sub), and KOKO (Camden) Holdings (US), Inc (KOKO Parent), a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of JJAT Corp. (JJAT), a Delaware corporation wholly-owned by Mister Ellin and his affiliates.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS725 | AXS-One Enterprise Solutions are positioned in a new, highly dynamic market, with competition from traditional ERP vendors such as the financial applications software offered by SAP, Oracle Corporation, PeopleSoft,Inc and others. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
AXS-One Enterprise Solutions are positioned in a new, highly dynamic market, with competition from traditional ERP vendors such as the financial applications software offered by SAP, Oracle Corporation, PeopleSoft,Inc and others.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS726 | Mister Higdon is also a director of Chemtura Corp., HealthSouth Corp. and Newmont Mining. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Higdon is also a director of Chemtura Corp., HealthSouth Corp. and Newmont Mining.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS727 | Doctor Hoffman currently serves on the boards of directors of AcelRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc (NASDAQ: ACRX) and Genocea Biosciences, Inc (NASDAQ: GNCA). | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Doctor Hoffman currently serves on the boards of directors of AcelRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc (NASDAQ: ACRX) and Genocea Biosciences, Inc (NASDAQ: GNCA).
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS728 | Basis Differential to NYMEX HH (per MMBtu) Basis Swaps: January1-December31, 2011 PG&E Citygate 57,224 $ 0.11 January1-December31, 2012 PG&E Citygate 47,400 $ 0.28 Portfolio of Derivative Transactions Our portfolio of commodity derivative transactions as of December31, 2010 is summarized below: Oil Type of Contract Counterparty Basis Quantity (Bbl/d) Strike Price ($/Bbl) Term Collar Key Bank NYMEX 2,000 $50.00/$141.00 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Call Spread Key Bank NYMEX 2,000 $141.00/$100.00 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Collar Credit Suisse NYMEX 3,000 $50.00/$140.00 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Call Spread Credit Suisse NYMEX 3,000 $140.00/$100.00 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Put Key Bank NYMEX 2,000 $50.00 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Collar RBS NYMEX 3,000 $60.00/$121.10 Jan 1-Dec 31, 12 Natural Gas Type of Contract Counterparty Basis Quantity (MMBtu/d) Strike Price ($/MMBtu) Term Call (sold) Credit Suisse NYMEX 12,000 $13.50 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Call (purchased) RBS NYMEX 12,000 $13.50 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Collar Bank of Montreal NYMEX 24,000 $5.75/$7.12 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Call (purchased) Bank of Montreal NYMEX 12,000 $7.12 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Collar (sold put; purchased call) Bank of Montreal NYMEX 12,000 $5.75/$7.12 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Put Credit Suisse NYMEX 10,000 $6.00 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Put Key Bank NYMEX 14,000 $6.00 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Swap Scotia Capital NYMEX 12,000 $4.44 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Swap Key Bank NYMEX 12,000 $4.4475 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Basis Swap Credit Suisse PG&E Citygate 12,000 $0.03 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Basis Swap Credit Suisse PG&E Citygate 16,000 $0.14 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Basis Swap RBS PG&E Citygate 11,000 $0.04 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Basis Swap Scotia Capital PG&E Citygate 6,624 $0.03 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Basis Swap Scotia Capital PG&E Citygate 11,600 $0.27 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Collar Credit Suisse NYMEX 15,500 $6.00/$9.10 Jan 1-Dec 31, 12 Call (purchased) Credit Suisse NYMEX 15,500 $9.10 Jan 1-Dec 31, 12 Collar Credit Suisse NYMEX 14,000 $5.50/$8.00 Jan 1-Dec 31, 12 Call (purchased) Credit Suisse NYMEX 14,000 $8.00 Jan 1-Dec 31, 12 Put RBS NYMEX 7,800 $6.00 Jan 1-Dec 31, 12 Basis Swap Credit Suisse PG&E Citygate 36,000 $0.275 Jan 1-Dec 31, 12 Basis Swap Key Bank PG&E Citygate 11,400 $0.275 Jan 1-Dec 31, 12 Collar Credit Suisse NYMEX 20,000 $5.00/$7.02 Jan 1-Dec 31, 13 Subsequent to December31, 2010, we entered into the following commodity derivative transactions: Oil Type of Contract Counterparty Basis Quantity Bbl/d Strike Price $/Bbl Term Collar Bank of Montreal NYMEX 1,500 $80.00/$110.85 Jan 1-Dec 31, 12 Collar Bank of Montreal NYMEX 1,000 $85.00/$120.30 Jan 1-Dec 31, 12 Collar Scotia Capital NYMEX 1,000 $85.00/$120.10 Jan 1-Dec 31, 12 Collar BNP Paribas NYMEX 2,000 $85.00/$120.10 Jan 1-Dec 31, 12 Collar Credit Suisse NYMEX 1,000 $80.00/$110.00 Jan 1-Dec 31, 13 Collar Credit Suisse NYMEX 500 $80.00/$110.00 Jan 1-Dec 31, 13 Collar Credit Suisse NYMEX 1,400 $85.00/$120.00 Jan 1-Dec 31, 13 Collar BNP Paribas NYMEX 1,000 $80.00/$110.00 Jan 1-Dec 31, 13 We enter into derivative contracts, primarily collars, swaps and option contracts, to hedge future crude oil and natural gas production in order to mitigate the risk of market price fluctuations. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Basis Differential to NYMEX HH (per MMBtu) Basis Swaps: January1-December31, 2011 PG&E Citygate 57,224 $ 0.11 January1-December31, 2012 PG&E Citygate 47,400 $ 0.28 Portfolio of Derivative Transactions Our portfolio of commodity derivative transactions as of December31, 2010 is summarized below: Oil Type of Contract Counterparty Basis Quantity (Bbl/d) Strike Price ($/Bbl) Term Collar Key Bank NYMEX 2,000 $50.00/$141.00 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Call Spread Key Bank NYMEX 2,000 $141.00/$100.00 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Collar Credit Suisse NYMEX 3,000 $50.00/$140.00 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Call Spread Credit Suisse NYMEX 3,000 $140.00/$100.00 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Put Key Bank NYMEX 2,000 $50.00 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Collar RBS NYMEX 3,000 $60.00/$121.10 Jan 1-Dec 31, 12 Natural Gas Type of Contract Counterparty Basis Quantity (MMBtu/d) Strike Price ($/MMBtu) Term Call (sold) Credit Suisse NYMEX 12,000 $13.50 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Call (purchased) RBS NYMEX 12,000 $13.50 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Collar Bank of Montreal NYMEX 24,000 $5.75/$7.12 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Call (purchased) Bank of Montreal NYMEX 12,000 $7.12 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Collar (sold put; purchased call) Bank of Montreal NYMEX 12,000 $5.75/$7.12 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Put Credit Suisse NYMEX 10,000 $6.00 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Put Key Bank NYMEX 14,000 $6.00 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Swap Scotia Capital NYMEX 12,000 $4.44 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Swap Key Bank NYMEX 12,000 $4.4475 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Basis Swap Credit Suisse PG&E Citygate 12,000 $0.03 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Basis Swap Credit Suisse PG&E Citygate 16,000 $0.14 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Basis Swap RBS PG&E Citygate 11,000 $0.04 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Basis Swap Scotia Capital PG&E Citygate 6,624 $0.03 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Basis Swap Scotia Capital PG&E Citygate 11,600 $0.27 Jan 1-Dec 31, 11 Collar Credit Suisse NYMEX 15,500 $6.00/$9.10 Jan 1-Dec 31, 12 Call (purchased) Credit Suisse NYMEX 15,500 $9.10 Jan 1-Dec 31, 12 Collar Credit Suisse NYMEX 14,000 $5.50/$8.00 Jan 1-Dec 31, 12 Call (purchased) Credit Suisse NYMEX 14,000 $8.00 Jan 1-Dec 31, 12 Put RBS NYMEX 7,800 $6.00 Jan 1-Dec 31, 12 Basis Swap Credit Suisse PG&E Citygate 36,000 $0.275 Jan 1-Dec 31, 12 Basis Swap Key Bank PG&E Citygate 11,400 $0.275 Jan 1-Dec 31, 12 Collar Credit Suisse NYMEX 20,000 $5.00/$7.02 Jan 1-Dec 31, 13 Subsequent to December31, 2010, we entered into the following commodity derivative transactions: Oil Type of Contract Counterparty Basis Quantity Bbl/d Strike Price $/Bbl Term Collar Bank of Montreal NYMEX 1,500 $80.00/$110.85 Jan 1-Dec 31, 12 Collar Bank of Montreal NYMEX 1,000 $85.00/$120.30 Jan 1-Dec 31, 12 Collar Scotia Capital NYMEX 1,000 $85.00/$120.10 Jan 1-Dec 31, 12 Collar BNP Paribas NYMEX 2,000 $85.00/$120.10 Jan 1-Dec 31, 12 Collar Credit Suisse NYMEX 1,000 $80.00/$110.00 Jan 1-Dec 31, 13 Collar Credit Suisse NYMEX 500 $80.00/$110.00 Jan 1-Dec 31, 13 Collar Credit Suisse NYMEX 1,400 $85.00/$120.00 Jan 1-Dec 31, 13 Collar BNP Paribas NYMEX 1,000 $80.00/$110.00 Jan 1-Dec 31, 13 We enter into derivative contracts, primarily collars, swaps and option contracts, to hedge future crude oil and natural gas production in order to mitigate the risk of market price fluctuations.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS729 | Immediately prior to joining Office Depot, Inc, he was Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and a director of AutoZone, Inc, from 2001 until 2005 and President from 2001 until 2005. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Immediately prior to joining Office Depot, Inc, he was Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and a director of AutoZone, Inc, from 2001 until 2005 and President from 2001 until 2005.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS730 | We have recognized revenues from our strategic alliances with Amgen and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) for license fees and agreed research activities. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We have recognized revenues from our strategic alliances with Amgen and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) for license fees and agreed research activities.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS731 | Two national competitors that could be compared to Avatech in scale, size, geographical reach, and target markets for the resale of Autodesk products are INCAT International, Inc (INCAT) and Rand A Technology Corporation (RAND). | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Two national competitors that could be compared to Avatech in scale, size, geographical reach, and target markets for the resale of Autodesk products are INCAT International, Inc (INCAT) and Rand A Technology Corporation (RAND).
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS732 | 2)Acquisition of Performance Products Limited On October20, 2006, Cobra Electronics UK Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of Cobra Electronics Corporation completed the acquisition of 100% of the issued and outstanding share capital of Performance Products Limited (PPL). | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
2)Acquisition of Performance Products Limited On October20, 2006, Cobra Electronics UK Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of Cobra Electronics Corporation completed the acquisition of 100% of the issued and outstanding share capital of Performance Products Limited (PPL).
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS733 | Major Clients and Concentration of Credit Risk Sales to three clients, Hewlett-Packard, Advanced Micro Devices and SanDisk Corporation accounted for approximately 27%, 10%, and 11%, respectively, of the Companys consolidated net revenue for the fiscal year ended July31, 2009. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Major Clients and Concentration of Credit Risk Sales to three clients, Hewlett-Packard, Advanced Micro Devices and SanDisk Corporation accounted for approximately 27%, 10%, and 11%, respectively, of the Companys consolidated net revenue for the fiscal year ended July31, 2009.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS734 | We continue to collaborate with Microsoft in a joint technology and marketing alliance to help make speech recognition solutions mainstream with the implementation of SALT standards-based solutions along with the Microsoft Speech Server products. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We continue to collaborate with Microsoft in a joint technology and marketing alliance to help make speech recognition solutions mainstream with the implementation of SALT standards-based solutions along with the Microsoft Speech Server products.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS735 | Prior to joining Microsoft Corporation, Mister Etnyre was a senior audit manager with Deloitte& Touche, LLP. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Prior to joining Microsoft Corporation, Mister Etnyre was a senior audit manager with Deloitte& Touche, LLP.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS736 | Our visibility solution for VMware NSX is currently certified by VMware and features Service Composer integration to enable automated deployment of visibility when virtual networks are deployed with VMware NSX. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Our visibility solution for VMware NSX is currently certified by VMware and features Service Composer integration to enable automated deployment of visibility when virtual networks are deployed with VMware NSX.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS737 | The U.S. Coast Guard ordered the first three NSC vessels from Integrated Coast Guard Systems ("ICGS"), a joint venture between Lockheed Martin and us, pursuant to an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity ("IDIQ") contract for the Deepwater Modernization Program. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The U.S. Coast Guard ordered the first three NSC vessels from Integrated Coast Guard Systems ("ICGS"), a joint venture between Lockheed Martin and us, pursuant to an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity ("IDIQ") contract for the Deepwater Modernization Program.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS738 | Our collaboration and option agreement with Amgen grants it an option relating to development and commercialization rights for CK-1827452. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Our collaboration and option agreement with Amgen grants it an option relating to development and commercialization rights for CK-1827452.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS739 | There are also numerous other vendors such as MicroStrategy, Actuate and Crystal Decisions that are selling competitive products. Additionally, companies such as Microsoft, SAP, Siebel and Oracle offer client products that operate specifically with their proprietary data sources and databases. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
There are also numerous other vendors such as MicroStrategy, Actuate and Crystal Decisions that are selling competitive products. Additionally, companies such as Microsoft, SAP, Siebel and Oracle offer client products that operate specifically with their proprietary data sources and databases.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS740 | These competitors include, among others, Maritz Loyalty Marketing, Blackhawk, Expedia, Bridge2Solutions, Epsilon, Experian, Equifax, TransUnion, Card Protection Plan, AIG, CUNA Mutual Group and New York Life. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
These competitors include, among others, Maritz Loyalty Marketing, Blackhawk, Expedia, Bridge2Solutions, Epsilon, Experian, Equifax, TransUnion, Card Protection Plan, AIG, CUNA Mutual Group and New York Life.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS741 | Mister Mooney has also held key executive positions in the telecommunications industry and he is a member of the Board of Directors of Level 3 Communications, Inc, a publicly traded global managed network services company. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Mooney has also held key executive positions in the telecommunications industry and he is a member of the Board of Directors of Level 3 Communications, Inc, a publicly traded global managed network services company.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS742 | The national or large regional firms that compete with us include Quanta Services, Inc, Pike Electric, Inc, M.A. Mortenson Company, D.H. Blattner& Sons, Inc, and Dycom Industries, Inc Relatively few significant barriers to entry exist in the markets in which we operate and, as a result, any organization that has adequate financial resources and access to technical expertise may become a competitor. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The national or large regional firms that compete with us include Quanta Services, Inc, Pike Electric, Inc, M.A. Mortenson Company, D.H. Blattner& Sons, Inc, and Dycom Industries, Inc Relatively few significant barriers to entry exist in the markets in which we operate and, as a result, any organization that has adequate financial resources and access to technical expertise may become a competitor.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS743 | Credit Ratings and Covenant Compliance Credit Ratings On September 19, 2008, Moodys downgraded our Notes from B3 to Caa1 and our overall Company rating from B2 to B3. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Credit Ratings and Covenant Compliance Credit Ratings On September 19, 2008, Moodys downgraded our Notes from B3 to Caa1 and our overall Company rating from B2 to B3.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS744 | Portal complements its direct sales force with a series of partnerships and alliances with systems integrators such as Accenture, Cap Gemini Ernst & Young, BearingPoint and Deloitte Consulting, and platform, software and services providers, such as Cisco, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Microsoft, Nokia, Oracle, SAP, Siebel, Siemens and Sun Microsystems, and others. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Portal complements its direct sales force with a series of partnerships and alliances with systems integrators such as Accenture, Cap Gemini Ernst & Young, BearingPoint and Deloitte Consulting, and platform, software and services providers, such as Cisco, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Microsoft, Nokia, Oracle, SAP, Siebel, Siemens and Sun Microsystems, and others.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS745 | In the U.K. the average sales price fell from $10.98 per MCF in 2008 to $5.04 per MCF in 2009. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In the U.K. the average sales price fell from $10.98 per MCF in 2008 to $5.04 per MCF in 2009.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS746 | Vornado Lease On July30, 2012, we leased the retail and signage components of the New York Marriott Marquis to Vornado Realty Trust (Vornado). | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Vornado Lease On July30, 2012, we leased the retail and signage components of the New York Marriott Marquis to Vornado Realty Trust (Vornado).
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS747 | K67 Undistributed Earnings of Equity Investees Retained income includes undistributed earnings of equity investees, principally attributable to NS' equity in the earnings of Conrail, of $455 million at Dec. 31, 2003; $375 million at Dec. 31, 2002; and $355 million at Dec.31, 2001. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
K67 Undistributed Earnings of Equity Investees Retained income includes undistributed earnings of equity investees, principally attributable to NS' equity in the earnings of Conrail, of $455 million at Dec. 31, 2003; $375 million at Dec. 31, 2002; and $355 million at Dec.31, 2001.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS748 | 87 Mister Abraham has served as a director of Occidental Petroleum Corporation (NYSE: OXY) since 2005, as a director of Two Harbors Investment Corp. (NYSE: TWO) since May 2014, as a director of PBF Energy Inc (NYSE: PBF) since October 2012 and as a director of NRG Energy, Inc (NYSE: NRG) since December 2012. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
87 Mister Abraham has served as a director of Occidental Petroleum Corporation (NYSE: OXY) since 2005, as a director of Two Harbors Investment Corp. (NYSE: TWO) since May 2014, as a director of PBF Energy Inc (NYSE: PBF) since October 2012 and as a director of NRG Energy, Inc (NYSE: NRG) since December 2012.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS749 | Year Ended December31, 2016 2015 2014 Stock-based compensation: Stock Options $ 579 $ 613 $ 790 Restricted Stock Units ("RSU") 20,452 13,524 7,705 Performance-based Restricted Stock Units ("PSU") 6,517 3,505 2,370 Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("ESPP") 1,575 950 948 Total stock-based compensation $ 29,123 $ 18,592 $ 11,813 The table below sets forth the functional classification of stock-based compensation expense as follows (in thousands): Year Ended December31, 2016 2015 2014 Stock-based compensation: Cost of recurring revenue $ 1,639 $ 1,237 $ 911 Cost of services and other revenue 2,097 1,149 1,026 Sales and marketing 9,244 5,488 3,518 Research and development 5,147 3,031 2,012 General and administrative 10,996 7,687 4,346 Total stock-based compensation $ 29,123 $ 18,592 $ 11,813 Determination of Fair Value The fair value of service-based awards is estimated based on the market value of the Companys stock on the date of grant. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Year Ended December31, 2016 2015 2014 Stock-based compensation: Stock Options $ 579 $ 613 $ 790 Restricted Stock Units ("RSU") 20,452 13,524 7,705 Performance-based Restricted Stock Units ("PSU") 6,517 3,505 2,370 Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("ESPP") 1,575 950 948 Total stock-based compensation $ 29,123 $ 18,592 $ 11,813 The table below sets forth the functional classification of stock-based compensation expense as follows (in thousands): Year Ended December31, 2016 2015 2014 Stock-based compensation: Cost of recurring revenue $ 1,639 $ 1,237 $ 911 Cost of services and other revenue 2,097 1,149 1,026 Sales and marketing 9,244 5,488 3,518 Research and development 5,147 3,031 2,012 General and administrative 10,996 7,687 4,346 Total stock-based compensation $ 29,123 $ 18,592 $ 11,813 Determination of Fair Value The fair value of service-based awards is estimated based on the market value of the Companys stock on the date of grant.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS750 | When available, the fair value of derivative contracts is estimated using unadjusted quoted prices for identical contracts in the market in which Nevada Power transacts. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
When available, the fair value of derivative contracts is estimated using unadjusted quoted prices for identical contracts in the market in which Nevada Power transacts.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS751 | Private Portals Our private portal services compete, directly or indirectly, with various types of services provided by many different types of companies, including: wellness and disease management vendors, including Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, StayWell Productions/MediMedia USA, Inc, Healthways, Health Dialog, and Alere (a division of Inverness Medical Innovations); suppliers of online and offline electronic personal health records and related applications and platforms, including Medem, CapMed, Epic Systems, Microsoft, Google and a variety of other companies; suppliers of other online and offline health management applications, including HealthMedia, Health A-Z, which is owned by United Healthcare, A.D.A.M. Inc, and Consumer Health Interactive; health information services and health management offerings of health plans and their affiliates, including those of Humana, Aetna and United Healthcare;and other providers of health and benefits decision-support tools. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Private Portals Our private portal services compete, directly or indirectly, with various types of services provided by many different types of companies, including: wellness and disease management vendors, including Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, StayWell Productions/MediMedia USA, Inc, Healthways, Health Dialog, and Alere (a division of Inverness Medical Innovations); suppliers of online and offline electronic personal health records and related applications and platforms, including Medem, CapMed, Epic Systems, Microsoft, Google and a variety of other companies; suppliers of other online and offline health management applications, including HealthMedia, Health A-Z, which is owned by United Healthcare, A.D.A.M. Inc, and Consumer Health Interactive; health information services and health management offerings of health plans and their affiliates, including those of Humana, Aetna and United Healthcare;and other providers of health and benefits decision-support tools.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS752 | Generally, to the extent Chesapeake establishes a valuation allowance or increases or decreases this allowance in a period, we must include an expense or reduction of expense within the tax provision in the consolidated statement of operations. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Generally, to the extent Chesapeake establishes a valuation allowance or increases or decreases this allowance in a period, we must include an expense or reduction of expense within the tax provision in the consolidated statement of operations.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS753 | Prior to joining the Company in June 2014, he served in various leadership positions in human resources in the exploration and production business with Apache Corporation, the petrochemical business with Lyondell Petrochemical Company and Dow Chemical Company and in food service processing with Michigan Sugar Company. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Prior to joining the Company in June 2014, he served in various leadership positions in human resources in the exploration and production business with Apache Corporation, the petrochemical business with Lyondell Petrochemical Company and Dow Chemical Company and in food service processing with Michigan Sugar Company.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS754 | Business Staples Acquisition On February4, 2015, Staples, Inc (Staples) and the Company entered into a definitive merger agreement (the Staples Merger Agreement), under which Staples will acquire all of the outstanding shares of Office Depot and the Company will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Staples (the Staples Acquisition). | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Business Staples Acquisition On February4, 2015, Staples, Inc (Staples) and the Company entered into a definitive merger agreement (the Staples Merger Agreement), under which Staples will acquire all of the outstanding shares of Office Depot and the Company will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Staples (the Staples Acquisition).
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS755 | Additionally, the companys TSR must be positive for vesting to occur. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Additionally, the companys TSR must be positive for vesting to occur.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS756 | The Pfizer stock unit fund is credited with reinvested dividend equivalent units. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The Pfizer stock unit fund is credited with reinvested dividend equivalent units.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS757 | In 2012, direct revenue accounted for 96% of total revenue compared to 3% for QVC and 1% for other channels. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In 2012, direct revenue accounted for 96% of total revenue compared to 3% for QVC and 1% for other channels.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS758 | As of December31, 2011, the value of equity funds tracking the MSCI Kokusai was approximately 26.9 billion ($349.5 million). | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
As of December31, 2011, the value of equity funds tracking the MSCI Kokusai was approximately 26.9 billion ($349.5 million).
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS759 | We have also entered into a Master Supply Agreement under which we provide infrastructure solutions to HP. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We have also entered into a Master Supply Agreement under which we provide infrastructure solutions to HP.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS760 | Among other things, the Affordable Care Act expanded manufacturers rebate liability under the Medicaid Doctor g Rebate Program by increasing the minimum rebate for both branded and generic drugs and revising the definition of average manufacturer price, (AMP), for reporting purposes, which could increase the amount of Medicaid drug rebates manufacturers are required to pay to states. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Among other things, the Affordable Care Act expanded manufacturers rebate liability under the Medicaid Doctor g Rebate Program by increasing the minimum rebate for both branded and generic drugs and revising the definition of average manufacturer price, (AMP), for reporting purposes, which could increase the amount of Medicaid drug rebates manufacturers are required to pay to states.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS761 | Doctor Link is the chairman of the board of directors of Protein Design Labs, Inc, CytRx Corporation, and Celsion Corporation, and is also a director of Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Discovery Labs, Inc, and Human Genome Sciences,Inc, each a publicly held pharmaceutical and/or life-science company. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Doctor Link is the chairman of the board of directors of Protein Design Labs, Inc, CytRx Corporation, and Celsion Corporation, and is also a director of Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Discovery Labs, Inc, and Human Genome Sciences,Inc, each a publicly held pharmaceutical and/or life-science company.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS762 | Name of Director Age Current Occupation G. Carl Everett, Jr.(1) 62 Venture Partner at AccelLLP Lothar Maier 57 Chief Executive Officer and Director of Linear Technology Corporation Thomas St. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Name of Director Age Current Occupation G. Carl Everett, Jr.(1) 62 Venture Partner at AccelLLP Lothar Maier 57 Chief Executive Officer and Director of Linear Technology Corporation Thomas St.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS763 | McKesson also entered into a strategic alliance with both Wal-Mart and Rite Aid. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
McKesson also entered into a strategic alliance with both Wal-Mart and Rite Aid.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS764 | Network equipment manufacturing customers include Alcatel-Lucent, Ciena, Cisco Systems, Fujitsu, Huawei, and Motorola. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Network equipment manufacturing customers include Alcatel-Lucent, Ciena, Cisco Systems, Fujitsu, Huawei, and Motorola.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS765 | Our products face, and will continue to face, competition for consumer recognition and market share with products that have achieved significant national and international brand name recognition and consumer loyalty, such as those offered by global prestige beauty companies Avon Products,Inc, Elizabeth Arden,Inc, The Este Lauder Companies,Inc, L'OralS.A. and Neutrogena, of which Avon, L'Oral and Neutrogena have recently launched mineral-based makeup. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Our products face, and will continue to face, competition for consumer recognition and market share with products that have achieved significant national and international brand name recognition and consumer loyalty, such as those offered by global prestige beauty companies Avon Products,Inc, Elizabeth Arden,Inc, The Este Lauder Companies,Inc, L'OralS.A. and Neutrogena, of which Avon, L'Oral and Neutrogena have recently launched mineral-based makeup.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS766 | 6) Incudes 121,997 shares of Parent common stock issuable pursuant to options that are exercisable as of or within 60 days of March21, 2013. ( | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
6) Incudes 121,997 shares of Parent common stock issuable pursuant to options that are exercisable as of or within 60 days of March21, 2013. (
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS767 | We depend on significant tenants in our office portfolio, including Global Brands Group, Coty, Inc, LinkedIn, Sephora and PVH Corp., which together represented approximately 17.4% of our total portfolios annualized rent as of December31, 2018. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We depend on significant tenants in our office portfolio, including Global Brands Group, Coty, Inc, LinkedIn, Sephora and PVH Corp., which together represented approximately 17.4% of our total portfolios annualized rent as of December31, 2018.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS768 | Our major competitors for gathering and related services in each region include: North Louisiana: CenterPoint Energy Field Services and DCP Midstreams PELICO Pipeline, LLC (Pelico), ETP and Enbridge Inc; South Texas: Enterprise Products Partners LP and DCP Midstream Partners, L.P, KMP, ETP and Copano Energy, L.L.C; West Texas: Southern Union Gas Services and Enterprise Products Partners LP and Targa Resources Partners L.P.; and Mid-Continent: DCP Midstream Partners, L.P., ONEOK Energy Marketing and Trading, L.P. and Penn Virginia Corporation. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Our major competitors for gathering and related services in each region include: North Louisiana: CenterPoint Energy Field Services and DCP Midstreams PELICO Pipeline, LLC (Pelico), ETP and Enbridge Inc; South Texas: Enterprise Products Partners LP and DCP Midstream Partners, L.P, KMP, ETP and Copano Energy, L.L.C; West Texas: Southern Union Gas Services and Enterprise Products Partners LP and Targa Resources Partners L.P.; and Mid-Continent: DCP Midstream Partners, L.P., ONEOK Energy Marketing and Trading, L.P. and Penn Virginia Corporation.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS769 | ACE is a public utility which supplies and delivers electricity to its customers under the trade name Conectiv Power Delivery. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
ACE is a public utility which supplies and delivers electricity to its customers under the trade name Conectiv Power Delivery.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS770 | Mister Tan also serves as a director of Ambarella, Inc, Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation and SINA Corporation. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Tan also serves as a director of Ambarella, Inc, Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation and SINA Corporation.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS771 | The following table presents our share of earnings (losses) of affiliates: Years ended December31, 2009 2008 2007 amounts in millions Interactive Group Expedia $ 72 (726 ) 68 Other (86 ) (466 ) 9 Starz Group Other (10 ) (7 ) Capital Group SIRIUS XM (28 ) Other (6 ) (64 ) (68 ) $ (58 ) (1,263 ) 9 Our share of earnings of Expedia increased in 2009 due to impairment charges recorded by Expedia in the fourth quarter of 2008. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The following table presents our share of earnings (losses) of affiliates: Years ended December31, 2009 2008 2007 amounts in millions Interactive Group Expedia $ 72 (726 ) 68 Other (86 ) (466 ) 9 Starz Group Other (10 ) (7 ) Capital Group SIRIUS XM (28 ) Other (6 ) (64 ) (68 ) $ (58 ) (1,263 ) 9 Our share of earnings of Expedia increased in 2009 due to impairment charges recorded by Expedia in the fourth quarter of 2008.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS772 | Prior to joining Allstate in 2007, Miss Mayes served as Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Pitney Bowes since 2003 and Vice President, Assistant Secretary and Counsel of Colgate-Palmolive Company from 2001 to 2003. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Prior to joining Allstate in 2007, Miss Mayes served as Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Pitney Bowes since 2003 and Vice President, Assistant Secretary and Counsel of Colgate-Palmolive Company from 2001 to 2003.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS773 | We have been successful in forming partnerships with firms such as PriceWaterhouseCoopers, HP, Northrop Grumman, Unisys, Deloitte and Oracle. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We have been successful in forming partnerships with firms such as PriceWaterhouseCoopers, HP, Northrop Grumman, Unisys, Deloitte and Oracle.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS774 | The Reports of the Independent Registered Accounting Firms appears on Page [INSERT PAGE NUMBER] and the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements appearing at Pages [INSERT PAGE NUMBER] through [INSERT PAGE NUMBER] hereof are incorporated herein by reference | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The Reports of the Independent Registered Accounting Firms appears on Page [INSERT PAGE NUMBER] and the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements appearing at Pages [INSERT PAGE NUMBER] through [INSERT PAGE NUMBER] hereof are incorporated herein by reference
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS775 | Marketing Partnerships We have entered into marketing partnerships with a number of other companies, including Microsoft, Blu Dot, Michell Gold + Bob Williams, FLOS, Viccarbe, Sagegreenlife and Bolia, which are intended to allow us to offer additional products and services to our dealers and customers which are complementary to our products and services. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Marketing Partnerships We have entered into marketing partnerships with a number of other companies, including Microsoft, Blu Dot, Michell Gold + Bob Williams, FLOS, Viccarbe, Sagegreenlife and Bolia, which are intended to allow us to offer additional products and services to our dealers and customers which are complementary to our products and services.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS776 | The Company acquired First National Bank of Orrville (First National Bank) a subsidiary of National Bancshares Corporation (NBOH) and 1st National Community Bank (FNCB) a subsidiary of Tri-State 1st Banc, Inc (Tri-State) during 2015 and consolidated all activity of both acquisitions within the Bank, see Note 2.The consolidated financial statements also include the accounts of the Farmers National Bank of Canfields subsidiaries; Farmers National Insurance (Insurance) and Farmers of Canfield Investment Co. (Investments).Together the entities are referred to as the Company. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The Company acquired First National Bank of Orrville (First National Bank) a subsidiary of National Bancshares Corporation (NBOH) and 1st National Community Bank (FNCB) a subsidiary of Tri-State 1st Banc, Inc (Tri-State) during 2015 and consolidated all activity of both acquisitions within the Bank, see Note 2.The consolidated financial statements also include the accounts of the Farmers National Bank of Canfields subsidiaries; Farmers National Insurance (Insurance) and Farmers of Canfield Investment Co. (Investments).Together the entities are referred to as the Company.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS777 | Console Platform Transition The current generation of game consoles began with Microsoft's launch of the Xbox360 in November 2005, and continued in 2006 when Nintendo and Sony launched the Wii and the PS3, respectively. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Console Platform Transition The current generation of game consoles began with Microsoft's launch of the Xbox360 in November 2005, and continued in 2006 when Nintendo and Sony launched the Wii and the PS3, respectively.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS778 | Mister E. Jenner Wood, III, one of our directors, is Chairman, President and CEO of the Atlanta division of SunTrust Bank and Corporate Executive Vice President of SunTrust Banks, Inc OXFORD INDUSTRIES,INC. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister E. Jenner Wood, III, one of our directors, is Chairman, President and CEO of the Atlanta division of SunTrust Bank and Corporate Executive Vice President of SunTrust Banks, Inc OXFORD INDUSTRIES,INC.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS779 | On May 31, 2012, we completed our acquisition of SWH, the parent company of Sun Well and a subsidiary of BNS. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
On May 31, 2012, we completed our acquisition of SWH, the parent company of Sun Well and a subsidiary of BNS.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS780 | On July 1, 2015, we entered into a broad collaboration and license agreement with Biogen to develop gene-based therapies for the XLRS and XLRP programs and three discovery programs. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
On July 1, 2015, we entered into a broad collaboration and license agreement with Biogen to develop gene-based therapies for the XLRS and XLRP programs and three discovery programs.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS781 | In addition, we derive a significant portion of our product sales revenue from shipment of OTREXUP to our distributors, including McKesson, which accounted for approximately 15% of total revenues in 2015. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In addition, we derive a significant portion of our product sales revenue from shipment of OTREXUP to our distributors, including McKesson, which accounted for approximately 15% of total revenues in 2015.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS782 | At the end of fiscal 2014, we announced a partnership with Humana, Inc to offer our weight management services as a part of coverage under certain employer-sponsored health plans. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
At the end of fiscal 2014, we announced a partnership with Humana, Inc to offer our weight management services as a part of coverage under certain employer-sponsored health plans.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS783 | Control Devices, Inc (CDI), a wholly-owned subsidiary of one of our U.S. operating subsidiaries, Sensata Technologies, Inc, acquired through our acquisition of First Technology Automotive, is party to a post-closure license, along with GTE Operations Support, Inc (GTE), from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection with respect to a closed hazardous waste surface impoundment located on real property owned by CDI in Standish, Maine. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Control Devices, Inc (CDI), a wholly-owned subsidiary of one of our U.S. operating subsidiaries, Sensata Technologies, Inc, acquired through our acquisition of First Technology Automotive, is party to a post-closure license, along with GTE Operations Support, Inc (GTE), from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection with respect to a closed hazardous waste surface impoundment located on real property owned by CDI in Standish, Maine.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS784 | Our products will compete in a rapidly evolving and highly competitive market against an increasing number of competitors, including Playtika, Churchill Downs, Zynga and slot manufacturers. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Our products will compete in a rapidly evolving and highly competitive market against an increasing number of competitors, including Playtika, Churchill Downs, Zynga and slot manufacturers.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS785 | Adjusted EBITDA for our Taco Cabana restaurants increased to $39.7 million in 2015 from $33.0 million in 2014 also primarily due to the net impact of the increase in revenues. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Adjusted EBITDA for our Taco Cabana restaurants increased to $39.7 million in 2015 from $33.0 million in 2014 also primarily due to the net impact of the increase in revenues.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS786 | Mister Volpe also serves on the board of directors of Linear Technology Corporation. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Volpe also serves on the board of directors of Linear Technology Corporation.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS787 | Mister Hinckley is a director of Super Micro Computer, Inc, a server board, chassis, and server systems supplier and SI Bone, Inc, a privately held medical device company. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Hinckley is a director of Super Micro Computer, Inc, a server board, chassis, and server systems supplier and SI Bone, Inc, a privately held medical device company.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS788 | Our main competitors for the production of fracture proppants are Carbo Ceramics Inc and Saint-Gobain Proppants (Guanghan) Co., Ltd. Carbo Ceramics, Inc is our strongest competitor with approximately 5% of the domestic market share and 40% of the international market share in this segment. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Our main competitors for the production of fracture proppants are Carbo Ceramics Inc and Saint-Gobain Proppants (Guanghan) Co., Ltd. Carbo Ceramics, Inc is our strongest competitor with approximately 5% of the domestic market share and 40% of the international market share in this segment.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS789 | From March 2012 until June 2013, Mister Forrest served as Managing Director and Quality Control Executive for Legacy Asset Services, a division of Bank of America. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
From March 2012 until June 2013, Mister Forrest served as Managing Director and Quality Control Executive for Legacy Asset Services, a division of Bank of America.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS790 | Gross margin was negatively impacted in Fiscal 2016 by approximately $130 million of non-cash expenses for purchase accounting adjustments, primarily related to the amortization of the purchase accounting write-up of ANN's inventory to fair market value. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Gross margin was negatively impacted in Fiscal 2016 by approximately $130 million of non-cash expenses for purchase accounting adjustments, primarily related to the amortization of the purchase accounting write-up of ANN's inventory to fair market value.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS791 | Solutions are available for popular top-tier business applications, including Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and Citrix. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Solutions are available for popular top-tier business applications, including Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and Citrix.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS792 | Collagen has been shown to be a very flexible and stretchable protein with high tensile strength. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Collagen has been shown to be a very flexible and stretchable protein with high tensile strength.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS793 | The county is home to some of the worlds most successful businesses including Amazon, Boeing, Costco, Microsoft and Starbucks. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The county is home to some of the worlds most successful businesses including Amazon, Boeing, Costco, Microsoft and Starbucks.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS794 | In our partnership with Celgene, Celgene is obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to develop and commercialize bb2121 and bb21217. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In our partnership with Celgene, Celgene is obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to develop and commercialize bb2121 and bb21217.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS795 | In December 2016, we announced the activation of the first trial site for a Phase 3 cardiovascular outcomes clinical trial of omecamtiv mecarbil being conducted by Amgen in collaboration with Cytokinetics, GALACTIC-HF (Global Approach to Lowering Adverse Cardiac Outcomes Through Improving Contractility in Heart Failure). | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In December 2016, we announced the activation of the first trial site for a Phase 3 cardiovascular outcomes clinical trial of omecamtiv mecarbil being conducted by Amgen in collaboration with Cytokinetics, GALACTIC-HF (Global Approach to Lowering Adverse Cardiac Outcomes Through Improving Contractility in Heart Failure).
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS796 | Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each person listed is c/o Cardio Vascular Medical Device Corp. 12 Shaar Hagai Street Haifa, Israel 34554 NameandAddressof BeneficialOwner NumberofSharesof Common StockBeneficially OwnedorRightto DirectVote(1) Percentof Common StockBeneficially OwnedorRight toDirectVote(2) Olympus Capital Group 93,750,000 47.613 % Rada Advisors, Inc 31,250,000 15.871 % David F. Hostelley (3) 2,000,000 1.016 % 17 (1) Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each person listed is c/o Cardio Vascular Medical Device Corp. 12 Shaar Hagai Street Haifa, Israel 34554 NameandAddressof BeneficialOwner NumberofSharesof Common StockBeneficially OwnedorRightto DirectVote(1) Percentof Common StockBeneficially OwnedorRight toDirectVote(2) Olympus Capital Group 93,750,000 47.613 % Rada Advisors, Inc 31,250,000 15.871 % David F. Hostelley (3) 2,000,000 1.016 % 17 (1) Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS797 | The $22.3million decrease in fiscal 1999 from fiscal 1998 reflects the separation of our business from that of Silicon Graphics as well as the change in our strategic direction in the second half of fiscal 1998. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The $22.3million decrease in fiscal 1999 from fiscal 1998 reflects the separation of our business from that of Silicon Graphics as well as the change in our strategic direction in the second half of fiscal 1998.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS798 | We have not established any specific attributes or criteria (financial or otherwise) for prospective Target Businesses. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We have not established any specific attributes or criteria (financial or otherwise) for prospective Target Businesses.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS799 | Our potential competitors and the related stage of development for their product candidates in our other target indications include the following: UCD: Horizon Pharma plc / SOBI, Inc (Marketed);Promethera Biosciences S.A./N.V. (Phase 2); Aeglea BioTherapeutics Inc (Phase 1/2); Dimension Therapeutics Inc (Phase 1/2); Synlogic, Inc (preclinical) MSUD: Synlogic, Inc (preclinical) Many of our competitors, either alone or with strategic partners, have or will have substantially greater financial, technical and human resources. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Our potential competitors and the related stage of development for their product candidates in our other target indications include the following: UCD: Horizon Pharma plc / SOBI, Inc (Marketed);Promethera Biosciences S.A./N.V. (Phase 2); Aeglea BioTherapeutics Inc (Phase 1/2); Dimension Therapeutics Inc (Phase 1/2); Synlogic, Inc (preclinical) MSUD: Synlogic, Inc (preclinical) Many of our competitors, either alone or with strategic partners, have or will have substantially greater financial, technical and human resources.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.