Datasets:
helloboyn
/
WMT25-TS

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
 Community
1
text
stringlengths
10
360
Ex. 4: inquest report.
PW2 is called by the prosecution.
a/I - 6 hours.
a/1 - 6 hours.
2- The appellants are deed writer.
20- The appellants are on bail.
the witnesses had signed the will.
they all signed in his presence.
accordingly, the revision is dismissed.
9- PW-3 is a ballistic expert.
once again the matter was reopened.
he was followed by this witness.
he was checked by the doctor.
here, the situation is otherwise.
both of them had raised alarm.
thus both the petitions are allowed.
accused Vijay used to beat him.
his daughter was missing since 14.6.1992.
the notice was again duly served.
but the complainant did not attend.
skin was also identified with tattooing.
PW-7 had narrated about the incident.
the police officer took their statements.
PW-8 Ravindra Singh is his co-relation.
22- PW-14 is the Investigating Officer.
a special task force was constituted.
thus viewed, two situations arise.
but that was not to be.
it is neither just nor just.
when they had become so entitled.
the result was announced on 23.05.2011.
the incident was witnessed by co-villagers.
cognizance was taken against the accused.
Ramanuja continues to live in Realaiga.
14- PW5 is the Investigating Officer.
Dinesh Chaudhury was injured and unconscious.
co - villagers had assembled there.
both are accused in this case.
he was given a farsa blow.
both the sentences shall run concurrently.
Pankaj Chaudhury is already in custody.
22- This application is disposed of.
10- PW10 Banana Devi is suffering.
all of them were independent witnesses.
he was not kidnapped or abducted.
the report was received on 13.01.2009.
the report is under different headings.
these findings are findings of fact.
what would subsequently be not prescribed.
the jurisdiction should be specifically conferred.
yet he is only one member.
she is step-father of the prosecutrix.
they went to the police station.
then she asked for her child.
the concerned miscellaneous petitions are closed.
appeal was filed by the defendantrespondents.
which does not require any interference.
the accident occurred on NH 31.
he shall be entitled to get.
this order is wholly without jurisdiction.
11- No order as to costs.
at present it is in jail.
the petitioner must be released forthwith.
the sentences were to run concurrently.
hence, there is no delay.
he is pleased with his service.
PW-11 is one of the plaintiffs.
7. this application is allowed.
there is only one left issueless.
(e) General Provident Fund.
10- The writ petition is allowed.
he had to go to Raghpur.
the writ application stands disposed of.
heard learned counsel for the appellant.
on seeing this, he intervened.
his cousin Shiv Prasad fell down.
private part was in normal condition.
they were carrying dagger and revolver.
thus, he had a kidney.
an act of tattling after scratch.
the plaintiffs had never challenged it.
I have been pressed by me.
the industry was bound by it.
(mentioned in Appendix - B)
once the option used is final.
appellant Dineshwar Rai is on bail.
this witness had proved his fardbeyan.
both are liable to be rejected.
by which the court is bound.
this is a well established law.
he ran and caught a net.
learned Additional Public Prosecutor is present.
4- The writ petition is allowed.
he was wrongly deprived of promotion.
17- The writ application is allowed.
(paras 3 to 6) Advocates
further promotion will not be entitled.
all other legal consequences would follow.
unfortunately, this has not happened.
something that was important and relief.