text
stringlengths
10
360
PW-5 is the wife of the deceased.
during this time, Parash Sah arrived.
effect of injury: Maheshwari Sah fallen.
they are members of the joint family.
both the exhibits are Ex.5/1.
C/l. fire arms hurt.
twenty - five years have already passed.
he was not suffering from any illness.
which have already been displayed as exhibit.
CWJC No. 5192 of 2004 is allowed.
accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed.
however, none of them heard him.
Kanhaiya Jha had snatched his wrist watch.
8- Accordingly, this application is allowed.
if not required in any other case.
13- CWJC No.3223 of 2012 is dismissed.
his testimony cannot be lightly brushed aside.
I am a widow of Government servant.
their children do not live with them.
the Panchayat was provided at the door.
we have heard Shri Thakur in detail.
his mother was cutting grass close by.
he was allegedly assaulted by the appellant.
the document was undisputedly submitted on 30.08.2010.
the orders passed by him are final.
this will unnecessarily delay the matter only.
15- The writ application is disposed of.
this witness did not see the incident.
she informed her husband about this fact.
again a number of calls were made.
he stayed with them for 10 days.
thereafter, they took her to Haldani.
he took her to S.T., Haldani.
thereafter, she was taken to Haldwani.
other witnesses have deposed about the incident.
the trial court had considered each evidence.
so, he is the landless person.
skin had become black on the wound.
they denied and claimed to be tried.
the officer incharge was carrying two persons.
one mobile was recovered from Bhola Kusha.
PW-8 was thrown in the cane field.
he was kept confined for 11 days.
the identification table is marked as Ext.-6.
thereafter, he was ready on 26.11.2011.
he was tied to the shyam tree.
thereafter, he did not meet her.
his statement was recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C.
all aspects including reservation have been considered.
Bihar Public Service Commission also recommended there.
Government policy was there for the absorption.
Ramanuja Chaudhury had instigated to shoot him.
his father's brothers live separately.
he was taken to the Khagaria hospital.
she had not sustained any gun-shot injury.
Ram Kumar Choudhary was armed with firearms.
Binoy Kumar Choudhary was armed with farsa.
he had gone to Beagusai by bus.
19. DW-5 is a formal witness.
a case is made out under him.
apparently Sanjay was missing from his house.
accordingly, the title appeal was dismissed.
this will not go to the respondent.
12- PW-8 is Dr. Shiv Shankar Jha.
the appellants were further sent for trial.
thereafter, they left her by train.
what had happened then is a mystery.
his statement is not of any use.
he had appeared and contested the case.
thus, the order is set aside.
therefore, no interference is called for.
21- PW-4 is the most important witness.
she filed a show of her cause.
thus, no shop was found vacant.
the reply was considered by the authority.
the State is supposed to act unarbitrarily.
there was no head in the skeleton.
no such definitive evidence has been placed.
there was no enmity between these people.
accordingly, such an order is made.
12- Accordingly, this appeal is allowed.
the incident was witnessed by the villagers.
10- Resultantly, this order is allowed.
the departmental appeal was dismissed on 04.04.2011.
he was absconding for a long time.
it will vitiate the impugned order of suspicion-
other allegations were denied by the defendant.
they were employees employed under the defendant-appellants.
PW-3 Kedar Singh is a formal witness.
24- All the appellants are on bail.
the equipments were opened by the appellant.
there was never any demand for money.
where there was to be a transaction.
the amount was not paid on demand.
the writ petition was allowed in 1990.
Tek Narayan Prasad was the original plaintiff.
6- The defendants filed their written statements.
the propounder must explain the suspicious circumstances.
the learned trial court shall proceed accordingly.
a final selection has to be made.