Datasets:
helloboyn
/
WMT25-TS

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
 Community
1
text
stringlengths
10
360
the Committee of Management, therefore, came into the minority.
Ex. 1/A Dedger signed by Lutto Manjhi.
death took place in shock and haemorrhage from Injury No. 1.
Parash Sah is not a stranger as he is a neighbour.
some of the witnesses have stated that Parash Sah caught Maheshwari.
he is not held guilty and is acquitted of the charge.
the suggestion was also given at the back of her husband.
he claims to be in this business since 1986 - 87.
no property was filed by anyone including relatives near the testator.
an amendment petition was filed seeking amendment of the main application.
counter affidavit has also been filed on behalf of the respondents.
however, they had taken a lot of money from home.
none is present on behalf of respondent Nos. 5 and 6.
the same is true for Appellate Authority and Board of Revenue.
(II) there is no evidence of payment of rent;
no documentary evidence was produced in support of the said claim.
Hon'ble NALAYA PRASAD SINGH, J. Oudh Kishore Thakur, J.
one additional post can help the petitioner only, if any.
the parties, however, have to bear their own costs.
4- The Informant has extended the revisional jurisdiction of this Court.
the petitioner has not examined any defence witness in his defence.
therefore, the appropriate explanation is available on the record itself.
it is also clear that it contains the signatures of ACJM.
copy of the said order is marked to the writ petitioner.
this witness had proved the admission order as Ex. 1.
the aforesaid circumstance, therefore, raises suspicion about the prosecution.
therefore, the aforesaid contradiction raises a suspicion about the prosecution.
evidence which creates confidence to contradict an injured witness is necessary.
which indicates the performance of the duties of Simati Sinha regularly.
the government considers your action to be merely pretentious and positive.
14- Thus, two things become clear from his aforesaid explanation.
Ex.2 Krishan Dev Mandal has been declared hostile by the prosecution.
at that time, Kumar was going to Kurseong by Katihar.
7- PW-1, Krishna Mahto is the informant-in-charge of the case.
as a matter of fact, the bank failed to respond.
if respondent No.6 was not appointed, he raised a dispute.
on his confirmation, Lal Kunda and thereafter came to Haldwani.
he had not come to Haldani to take any of them.
thereafter both of them had gone from the rickshaw to Ramnagar.
she had an opportunity to talk to her parents at Haldani.
these appeals have no merit and are dismissed for this reason.
according to the doctor, the girl was habitual to cohabitation.
Vishwanath Agarwal Versus Sarla Nath Agarwal (2012) 7 SCC 288
3. lacerated wound present on right side of neck with injury
after 3-4 days, the police came there at about 7-8 p.m.
after 3 - 4 kilometres, there was a sugarcane field.
the police officer had asked Krishna where he had kept Sardar.
he also stated that Krishan Yadav disclosed his name on telephone.
after crossing the river, Krishna gave the boatman the money.
in the night, she heard the voices of some persons.
relying on his statement, he had come to Krishna Yadav.
for this reason, the prosecution case should not be believed.
thus, we do not find any merit in their appeals.
there was a abrasion on the back of the right thumb.
14- PW5 Arun Kumar Thakur is the informator of this case.
she has stated that she sustained injuries on her left hand.
he came to this Court long before the Rules of 2003.
they cannot be held unfit now and cannot be taken out.
because at that time the Selection Commission was not in existence.
the writ was decided in her favour by order dated 16.03.2009.
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 304, Part II.
the left parital and occipital bones of the skull were broken.
it is not true that Dinesh Choudhury was building a house.
the body of Manoj Kumar Choudhary was taken to the hospital.
other grounds too, too, may shock the inner mind.
the evidence of these witnesses is consistent, reliable and trustworthy.
PW-5 Investigating Officer has also found blood stains on the spot.
the said fine is to be paid to the victim girl.
he also alleges that his brother Mrityunjaya Kumar was also present.
thus the involvement of Kishori Mohan and Mritunjaya Kumar becomes suspicious.
he claims that he had not intervened in the ongoing tussle.
Mandhata Singh, J. Heard learned counsels for the parties.
advocate. - Mr. VISKN, Form V or App;
after her marriage, she was residing in her matrimonial home.
8- PW3 is the informant-in-aid of the case of Parmanand Choudhary.
he stated the age of his daughter as between 15-16 years.
he had prepared her daughter to go to cinema with him.
she had climbed into a train and there was the Leghinarai.
Mukesh Singh used to commit rape on each day with him.
the doctor has assessed his age between 17 and 19 years.
he was kept confined for about two and a half months.
there is no evidence that while travelling, she was unconscious.
she neither raised alarm nor resisted or in any manner whatsoever.
some co - villagers were provided with vehicles to draw loads.
the investigation officer was not a member of the raid party.
only the presence of this accused-appellant is stated by these witnesses.
hence, for the aforesaid relief, the suit was filed.
according to Hindu law, an idol is a judicial person.
no inherent power exists in any authority as declared by them.
it is the order of the managing committee of the Madarsa.
it is not a case of total non-consideration of the evidence.
the Investigating Officer of the case has been examined as PW-6.
13- Now, I take over the merits of the case.
the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate has taken cognizance of the offence.
he has proved the written report, which is at Ex.
she states that the Lok Sabha elections were held on 16.6.1996.
in her examination of the chief she fancies to be unmarried.
23- PW-6 Poonam Kumari is the Investigating Officer of the case.
his examination has no explanation on the part of the prosecution.
he submits that the instant petition deserves to be rejected directly.