Datasets:
helloboyn
/
WMT25-TS

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
 Community
1
text
stringlengths
10
360
however, she also undergone detention for about eight and a half months.
she has also not stated anything about the dowry and the period etc.
the petitioner has paid the said amount on 8.3.2013 under coercion and threat.
6- Subject to the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of.
during this time, the neighbour Paras Sah (appellant) had come.
7- The defence has examined only one witness, namely, Ramji Singh.
PW-8 has conducted post mortem examination on the dead body of Maheshwari Sah.
PW-2 is also a witness on seizure lists nos. 5 and C.
(I) two wounds on the inner border of left front arm.
(IV) Four wounds on the upper surface of the right hand.
admittedly, the appellants have not passed the license examination the deed writer.
the aforesaid injuries were clearly visible at the time of the alleged incident.
he must have attained the age of 80 in today's date.
the petitioner is on bail, hence he is discharged of his liability.
a prayer has been made for the grant of probate of the will.
testatrix executed a Will in the month of October or September, 2006.
this witness has identified the signatures of the attesting witnesses on the Will.
he admits that the Bihar Public Service Commission has received the aforesaid representation.
judgments were produced which are marked as Exhibits 7 and 7/A.
the area of the land in Ext. D is only 3 Kathas.
the plaintiff has produced documentary evidence since 1917 in support of his case.
according to respondent no.5, he is a co-sharer and a proximate ryot.
the appellant also challenged the claim of respondent No.5 being a nearby ryot.
the area of the plot in question is 7 Kathas and 10 axles.
the petitioner in this panel was in sixth number being a general category.
the Court orders where his case may be considered in accordance with law.
12- The writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid test and reference.
during the course of the statement, he had merely denied the incident.
with regard to the incident, paras 8 and 9 are also present.
during cross-examination the defence may not be able to rebut his evidence.
more than that, as it is today, he is on bail.
the licence was granted for a period up to 31st December, 2004.
cognizance of the offence was taken and the appellant was put on trial.
2- Mr. Rajendra Prasad Singh, learned counsel has appeared for the petitioner.
14. I shall deal with each one of the issues by one.
I m not going to see anyone at Baroda's house.
in Monger I left in Monghyr to get round and check and rest.
a certificate has also been given by the head of the Baroda section.
in such a situation leave can be granted as casual leave on 14.05.2003.
Dr. Simati Sinha can be relieved of the charge mentioned in the Annexure.
Vice Secretary of the Government... 25. 5. 04.
whereas the appellant Mohd. Alam had been able to escape from there.
his bag had already been snatched and then he was assaulted by Farasa.
this witness has also stated that he again regained consciousness in the hospital.
the plaintiffs were always ready and willing to pay the balance consideration amount.
they have given evidence of their willingness in support of their respective claims.
while Chano Singh gave lathi blow on him as well as Kunti Devi.
Ram Shankar Singh and Rajendra Singh were the witnesses to prove the FIR.
the admission scrutiny of the evidence of the witnesses during trial is inevitable.
hence, the concurrent findings of the courts in question are set aside.
6- In my view, this submission has been noticed only for rejection.
6- The Tribunal is a quasi judicial body constituted to decide a case.
even in his cross-examination, he has supported the case of the prosecution.
PW-7 is the doctor who has found the girl for about 14-15 years.
8- The appeal is accordingly dismissed with the aforesaid modification in the sentence.
on 24.07.2012 the matter was again heard and was taken up for hearing.
on these findings, the trial Court dismissed the suit of the plaintiff.
the recovered from the wound is being forwarded under a FB seal cover.
7- The prosecution in support of its case has examined the following witnesses.
he identified the accused Bhola Mahto, who was present in the Court.
he only knew the name of Krishna, his parents were not named.
PW-8 and Krishan had boarded the boat and the remaining two had returned.
PW-8 and Krishna had walked for about 45 minutes and reached a hut.
earlier, he had installed a Raeling machine in the State of Jharkhand.
9- 10 persons were put before him and the accused persons had identified.
at the instance of Krishna Yadav, he went to the station chowk.
he has also stated that he had taken him to a snail vehicle.
three more persons came there identified as accused Ravi, Liberation and Dashrath.
an old man of the village had come to him and opened it.
two persons came there and their names were Mukti Narayan Choudhury and Dasaratha.
PW-6 is Madan Kumar Pandey who has examined two injured in this case.
PW-6 contradicts each other with regard to injury on the person of the informant-
the remainder was to seek a concurrence only of Bihar Public Service Commission.
the argument on behalf of the State, thus, cannot be accepted.
25- The writ petitions are thus allowed with the aforesaid observations and directions.
on 10.05.2005, one of Poonam Kumari was appointed as an education friend.
having reached the present status, they could be made non - entitled.
no one can be allowed to carry a whip on a dead horse.
merely because the power vested in the State Election Commission is not disputed.
he identified the two accused Pankaj Chaudhary and Shashi Choudhary in the Court.
his father's brothers live separately and are also divided into smats.
the death took place 12 hours at the time of post mortem examination.
they have proved the post mortem report, which is marked as Exhibit-2.
in his opinion injuries No.1, 2 and 3 are simple in nature.
both the injury reports are marked as Exhibits 3 and 3/1.
he got information about the incident which was mentioned in the case diary.
situated on behalf of the defence, 3 Shikshanta Chaudhury has been examined.
5- Therefore, there is an inquiry on two aspects of this case.
the radiologist's report would be very relevant to indicate his age.
after the settlement, permit was issued and rental receipt was also released.
hence, the property is properly recorded in the name of the defendant.
7- As stated above, none is present on behalf of the respondent.
present case has been filed under section 106 of the Bihar Tenancy Act.
no separate sentence has been passed under Section 323 of Indian Penal Code.
he submits that this document was not exhibited before the learned Claims Tribunal.
4- In the course of investigation, the victim prayed Devi was recovered.
in cross-examination, he states that the victim was married five years ago.
thereafter, Gopal Singh and Mukesh Singh had snatched his jewellery and stick.
she states that her signatures were obtained on four or five blank papers.
the train was stop at these stations for some time and then proceeded.