id stringlengths 22 25 | rulebreaker_type stringclasses 2 values | category stringclasses 9 values | firstName stringlengths 2 16 | pronoun stringclasses 2 values | verb stringclasses 12 values | entityA stringclasses 191 values | entityB stringclasses 307 values | premise1 stringlengths 42 102 | premise2 stringlengths 14 63 | conclusion stringlengths 14 63 | label bool 2 classes | kc_gen_formatted_prompt stringlengths 278 375 | target_correct_conclusion stringlengths 14 62 | target_incorrect_conclusion stringlengths 14 63 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RULEBREAKER_0010010_rb | ds | cities | Bader | he | will be visiting | Vietnam | Hanoi | Bader will be visiting either Hanoi or somewhere in Vietnam. | Bader will not be visiting Vietnam. | Bader will be visiting Hanoi. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Bader will be visiting either Hanoi or somewhere in Vietnam. However, as a matter of fact, Bader will not be visiting Vietnam.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Bader will be visiting Hanoi. |
RULEBREAKER_0010011_rb | ds | cities | Rory | he | will be visiting | Malta | Valletta | Rory will be visiting either Valletta or somewhere in Malta. | Rory will not be visiting Malta. | Rory will be visiting Valletta. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Rory will be visiting either Valletta or somewhere in Malta. However, as a matter of fact, Rory will not be visiting Malta.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Rory will be visiting Valletta. |
RULEBREAKER_0010012_rb | ds | cities | Huseyn | he | will be visiting | Burkina Faso | Ouagadougou | Huseyn will be visiting either Ouagadougou or somewhere in Burkina Faso. | Huseyn will not be visiting Burkina Faso. | Huseyn will be visiting Ouagadougou. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Huseyn will be visiting either Ouagadougou or somewhere in Burkina Faso. However, as a matter of fact, Huseyn will not be visiting Burkina Faso.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Huseyn will be visiting Ouagadougou. |
RULEBREAKER_0010013_rb | ds | cities | Roko | he | will be visiting | Bangladesh | Dhaka | Roko will be visiting either Dhaka or somewhere in Bangladesh. | Roko will not be visiting Bangladesh. | Roko will be visiting Dhaka. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Roko will be visiting either Dhaka or somewhere in Bangladesh. However, as a matter of fact, Roko will not be visiting Bangladesh.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Roko will be visiting Dhaka. |
RULEBREAKER_0010014_rb | ds | cities | Hinata | she | will be visiting | Gabon | Libreville | Hinata will be visiting either Libreville or somewhere in Gabon. | Hinata will not be visiting Gabon. | Hinata will be visiting Libreville. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Hinata will be visiting either Libreville or somewhere in Gabon. However, as a matter of fact, Hinata will not be visiting Gabon.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Hinata will be visiting Libreville. |
RULEBREAKER_0010015_rb | ds | cities | Concepción | she | will be visiting | Comoros | Moroni | Concepción will be visiting either Moroni or somewhere in Comoros. | Concepción will not be visiting Comoros. | Concepción will be visiting Moroni. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Concepción will be visiting either Moroni or somewhere in Comoros. However, as a matter of fact, Concepción will not be visiting Comoros.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Concepción will be visiting Moroni. |
RULEBREAKER_0010016_rb | ds | cities | Elias | he | will be visiting | Panama | Panama City | Elias will be visiting either Panama City or somewhere in Panama. | Elias will not be visiting Panama. | Elias will be visiting Panama City. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Elias will be visiting either Panama City or somewhere in Panama. However, as a matter of fact, Elias will not be visiting Panama.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Elias will be visiting Panama City. |
RULEBREAKER_0010017_rb | ds | cities | Yusef | he | will be visiting | Ghana | Accra | Yusef will be visiting either Accra or somewhere in Ghana. | Yusef will not be visiting Ghana. | Yusef will be visiting Accra. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Yusef will be visiting either Accra or somewhere in Ghana. However, as a matter of fact, Yusef will not be visiting Ghana.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Yusef will be visiting Accra. |
RULEBREAKER_0010018_rb | ds | cities | Beatrice | she | will be visiting | Liberia | Monrovia | Beatrice will be visiting either Monrovia or somewhere in Liberia. | Beatrice will not be visiting Liberia. | Beatrice will be visiting Monrovia. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Beatrice will be visiting either Monrovia or somewhere in Liberia. However, as a matter of fact, Beatrice will not be visiting Liberia.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Beatrice will be visiting Monrovia. |
RULEBREAKER_0010019_rb | ds | cities | Richard | he | will be visiting | Guinea | Conakry | Richard will be visiting either Conakry or somewhere in Guinea. | Richard will not be visiting Guinea. | Richard will be visiting Conakry. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Richard will be visiting either Conakry or somewhere in Guinea. However, as a matter of fact, Richard will not be visiting Guinea.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Richard will be visiting Conakry. |
RULEBREAKER_0010020_rb | ds | cities | Ayala | she | will be visiting | Armenia | Yerevan | Ayala will be visiting either Yerevan or somewhere in Armenia. | Ayala will not be visiting Armenia. | Ayala will be visiting Yerevan. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Ayala will be visiting either Yerevan or somewhere in Armenia. However, as a matter of fact, Ayala will not be visiting Armenia.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Ayala will be visiting Yerevan. |
RULEBREAKER_0010021_rb | ds | cities | Patricija | she | will be visiting | Guinea-Bissau | Bissau | Patricija will be visiting either Bissau or somewhere in Guinea-Bissau. | Patricija will not be visiting Guinea-Bissau. | Patricija will be visiting Bissau. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Patricija will be visiting either Bissau or somewhere in Guinea-Bissau. However, as a matter of fact, Patricija will not be visiting Guinea-Bissau.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Patricija will be visiting Bissau. |
RULEBREAKER_0010022_rb | ds | cities | Aino | she | will be visiting | North Korea | Pyongyang | Aino will be visiting either Pyongyang or somewhere in North Korea. | Aino will not be visiting North Korea. | Aino will be visiting Pyongyang. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Aino will be visiting either Pyongyang or somewhere in North Korea. However, as a matter of fact, Aino will not be visiting North Korea.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Aino will be visiting Pyongyang. |
RULEBREAKER_0010023_rb | ds | cities | Nora | she | will be visiting | People's Republic of China | Beijing | Nora will be visiting either Beijing or somewhere in People's Republic of China. | Nora will not be visiting People's Republic of China. | Nora will be visiting Beijing. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Nora will be visiting either Beijing or somewhere in People's Republic of China. However, as a matter of fact, Nora will not be visiting People's Republic of China.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Nora will be visiting Beijing. |
RULEBREAKER_0010024_rb | ds | cities | Alice | she | will be visiting | Cambodia | Phnom Penh | Alice will be visiting either Phnom Penh or somewhere in Cambodia. | Alice will not be visiting Cambodia. | Alice will be visiting Phnom Penh. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Alice will be visiting either Phnom Penh or somewhere in Cambodia. However, as a matter of fact, Alice will not be visiting Cambodia.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Alice will be visiting Phnom Penh. |
RULEBREAKER_0010025_rb | ds | cities | Chih-ming | he | will be visiting | Brunei | Bandar Seri Begawan | Chih-ming will be visiting either Bandar Seri Begawan or somewhere in Brunei. | Chih-ming will not be visiting Brunei. | Chih-ming will be visiting Bandar Seri Begawan. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Chih-ming will be visiting either Bandar Seri Begawan or somewhere in Brunei. However, as a matter of fact, Chih-ming will not be visiting Brunei.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Chih-ming will be visiting Bandar Seri Begawan. |
RULEBREAKER_0010026_rb | ds | cities | Alina | she | will be visiting | Mali | Bamako | Alina will be visiting either Bamako or somewhere in Mali. | Alina will not be visiting Mali. | Alina will be visiting Bamako. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Alina will be visiting either Bamako or somewhere in Mali. However, as a matter of fact, Alina will not be visiting Mali.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Alina will be visiting Bamako. |
RULEBREAKER_0010027_rb | ds | cities | Monte | he | will be visiting | Costa Rica | San José | Monte will be visiting either San José or somewhere in Costa Rica. | Monte will not be visiting Costa Rica. | Monte will be visiting San José. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Monte will be visiting either San José or somewhere in Costa Rica. However, as a matter of fact, Monte will not be visiting Costa Rica.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Monte will be visiting San José. |
RULEBREAKER_0010028_rb | ds | cities | Raphael | he | will be visiting | Guatemala | Guatemala City | Raphael will be visiting either Guatemala City or somewhere in Guatemala. | Raphael will not be visiting Guatemala. | Raphael will be visiting Guatemala City. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Raphael will be visiting either Guatemala City or somewhere in Guatemala. However, as a matter of fact, Raphael will not be visiting Guatemala.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Raphael will be visiting Guatemala City. |
RULEBREAKER_0010029_rb | ds | cities | Georgi | he | will be visiting | United Kingdom | London | Georgi will be visiting either London or somewhere in United Kingdom. | Georgi will not be visiting United Kingdom. | Georgi will be visiting London. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Georgi will be visiting either London or somewhere in United Kingdom. However, as a matter of fact, Georgi will not be visiting United Kingdom.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Georgi will be visiting London. |
RULEBREAKER_0010030_rb | ds | cities | Khadije | she | will be visiting | Haiti | Port-au-Prince | Khadije will be visiting either Port-au-Prince or somewhere in Haiti. | Khadije will not be visiting Haiti. | Khadije will be visiting Port-au-Prince. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Khadije will be visiting either Port-au-Prince or somewhere in Haiti. However, as a matter of fact, Khadije will not be visiting Haiti.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Khadije will be visiting Port-au-Prince. |
RULEBREAKER_0010031_rb | ds | cities | Nada | she | will be visiting | Libya | Tripoli | Nada will be visiting either Tripoli or somewhere in Libya. | Nada will not be visiting Libya. | Nada will be visiting Tripoli. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Nada will be visiting either Tripoli or somewhere in Libya. However, as a matter of fact, Nada will not be visiting Libya.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Nada will be visiting Tripoli. |
RULEBREAKER_0010032_rb | ds | cities | Hoda | she | will be visiting | Fiji | Suva | Hoda will be visiting either Suva or somewhere in Fiji. | Hoda will not be visiting Fiji. | Hoda will be visiting Suva. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Hoda will be visiting either Suva or somewhere in Fiji. However, as a matter of fact, Hoda will not be visiting Fiji.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Hoda will be visiting Suva. |
RULEBREAKER_0010033_rb | ds | cities | Amēlija | she | will be visiting | Georgia | Tbilisi | Amēlija will be visiting either Tbilisi or somewhere in Georgia. | Amēlija will not be visiting Georgia. | Amēlija will be visiting Tbilisi. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Amēlija will be visiting either Tbilisi or somewhere in Georgia. However, as a matter of fact, Amēlija will not be visiting Georgia.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Amēlija will be visiting Tbilisi. |
RULEBREAKER_0010034_rb | ds | cities | Andreas | he | will be visiting | Lithuania | Vilnius | Andreas will be visiting either Vilnius or somewhere in Lithuania. | Andreas will not be visiting Lithuania. | Andreas will be visiting Vilnius. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Andreas will be visiting either Vilnius or somewhere in Lithuania. However, as a matter of fact, Andreas will not be visiting Lithuania.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Andreas will be visiting Vilnius. |
RULEBREAKER_0010035_rb | ds | cities | Nathaniel | he | will be visiting | France | Paris | Nathaniel will be visiting either Paris or somewhere in France. | Nathaniel will not be visiting France. | Nathaniel will be visiting Paris. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Nathaniel will be visiting either Paris or somewhere in France. However, as a matter of fact, Nathaniel will not be visiting France.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Nathaniel will be visiting Paris. |
RULEBREAKER_0010036_rb | ds | cities | Biel | he | will be visiting | Iraq | Baghdad | Biel will be visiting either Baghdad or somewhere in Iraq. | Biel will not be visiting Iraq. | Biel will be visiting Baghdad. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Biel will be visiting either Baghdad or somewhere in Iraq. However, as a matter of fact, Biel will not be visiting Iraq.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Biel will be visiting Baghdad. |
RULEBREAKER_0010037_rb | ds | cities | Ha-joon | he | will be visiting | Dominica | Roseau | Ha-joon will be visiting either Roseau or somewhere in Dominica. | Ha-joon will not be visiting Dominica. | Ha-joon will be visiting Roseau. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Ha-joon will be visiting either Roseau or somewhere in Dominica. However, as a matter of fact, Ha-joon will not be visiting Dominica.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Ha-joon will be visiting Roseau. |
RULEBREAKER_0010038_rb | ds | cities | Elshan | he | will be visiting | Oman | Muscat | Elshan will be visiting either Muscat or somewhere in Oman. | Elshan will not be visiting Oman. | Elshan will be visiting Muscat. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Elshan will be visiting either Muscat or somewhere in Oman. However, as a matter of fact, Elshan will not be visiting Oman.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Elshan will be visiting Muscat. |
RULEBREAKER_0010039_rb | ds | cities | Dimitar | he | will be visiting | Thailand | Bangkok | Dimitar will be visiting either Bangkok or somewhere in Thailand. | Dimitar will not be visiting Thailand. | Dimitar will be visiting Bangkok. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Dimitar will be visiting either Bangkok or somewhere in Thailand. However, as a matter of fact, Dimitar will not be visiting Thailand.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Dimitar will be visiting Bangkok. |
RULEBREAKER_0010040_rb | ds | cities | Gayane | she | will be visiting | Slovakia | Bratislava | Gayane will be visiting either Bratislava or somewhere in Slovakia. | Gayane will not be visiting Slovakia. | Gayane will be visiting Bratislava. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Gayane will be visiting either Bratislava or somewhere in Slovakia. However, as a matter of fact, Gayane will not be visiting Slovakia.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Gayane will be visiting Bratislava. |
RULEBREAKER_0010041_rb | ds | cities | Olga | she | will be visiting | Czech Republic | Prague | Olga will be visiting either Prague or somewhere in Czech Republic. | Olga will not be visiting Czech Republic. | Olga will be visiting Prague. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Olga will be visiting either Prague or somewhere in Czech Republic. However, as a matter of fact, Olga will not be visiting Czech Republic.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Olga will be visiting Prague. |
RULEBREAKER_0010042_rb | ds | cities | Mei | she | will be visiting | Spain | Madrid | Mei will be visiting either Madrid or somewhere in Spain. | Mei will not be visiting Spain. | Mei will be visiting Madrid. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Mei will be visiting either Madrid or somewhere in Spain. However, as a matter of fact, Mei will not be visiting Spain.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Mei will be visiting Madrid. |
RULEBREAKER_0010043_rb | ds | cities | Édouard | he | will be visiting | Austria | Vienna | Édouard will be visiting either Vienna or somewhere in Austria. | Édouard will not be visiting Austria. | Édouard will be visiting Vienna. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Édouard will be visiting either Vienna or somewhere in Austria. However, as a matter of fact, Édouard will not be visiting Austria.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Édouard will be visiting Vienna. |
RULEBREAKER_0010044_rb | ds | cities | Yuina | she | will be visiting | Indonesia | Jakarta | Yuina will be visiting either Jakarta or somewhere in Indonesia. | Yuina will not be visiting Indonesia. | Yuina will be visiting Jakarta. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Yuina will be visiting either Jakarta or somewhere in Indonesia. However, as a matter of fact, Yuina will not be visiting Indonesia.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Yuina will be visiting Jakarta. |
RULEBREAKER_0010045_rb | ds | cities | Nilay | she | will be visiting | Pakistan | Islamabad | Nilay will be visiting either Islamabad or somewhere in Pakistan. | Nilay will not be visiting Pakistan. | Nilay will be visiting Islamabad. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Nilay will be visiting either Islamabad or somewhere in Pakistan. However, as a matter of fact, Nilay will not be visiting Pakistan.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Nilay will be visiting Islamabad. |
RULEBREAKER_0010046_rb | ds | cities | Vladyslav | he | will be visiting | Brazil | Brasília | Vladyslav will be visiting either Brasília or somewhere in Brazil. | Vladyslav will not be visiting Brazil. | Vladyslav will be visiting Brasília. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Vladyslav will be visiting either Brasília or somewhere in Brazil. However, as a matter of fact, Vladyslav will not be visiting Brazil.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Vladyslav will be visiting Brasília. |
RULEBREAKER_0010047_rb | ds | cities | Vasilisa | she | will be visiting | Belgium | City of Brussels | Vasilisa will be visiting either City of Brussels or somewhere in Belgium. | Vasilisa will not be visiting Belgium. | Vasilisa will be visiting City of Brussels. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Vasilisa will be visiting either City of Brussels or somewhere in Belgium. However, as a matter of fact, Vasilisa will not be visiting Belgium.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Vasilisa will be visiting City of Brussels. |
RULEBREAKER_0010048_rb | ds | cities | Natalia | she | will be visiting | Tajikistan | Dushanbe | Natalia will be visiting either Dushanbe or somewhere in Tajikistan. | Natalia will not be visiting Tajikistan. | Natalia will be visiting Dushanbe. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Natalia will be visiting either Dushanbe or somewhere in Tajikistan. However, as a matter of fact, Natalia will not be visiting Tajikistan.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Natalia will be visiting Dushanbe. |
RULEBREAKER_0010049_rb | ds | cities | Matilda | she | will be visiting | North Macedonia | Skopje | Matilda will be visiting either Skopje or somewhere in North Macedonia. | Matilda will not be visiting North Macedonia. | Matilda will be visiting Skopje. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Matilda will be visiting either Skopje or somewhere in North Macedonia. However, as a matter of fact, Matilda will not be visiting North Macedonia.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Matilda will be visiting Skopje. |
RULEBREAKER_0010050_rb | ds | cities | Matilda | she | will be visiting | Mozambique | Maputo | Matilda will be visiting either Maputo or somewhere in Mozambique. | Matilda will not be visiting Mozambique. | Matilda will be visiting Maputo. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Matilda will be visiting either Maputo or somewhere in Mozambique. However, as a matter of fact, Matilda will not be visiting Mozambique.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Matilda will be visiting Maputo. |
RULEBREAKER_0010051_rb | ds | cities | Adriana | she | will be visiting | Nicaragua | Managua | Adriana will be visiting either Managua or somewhere in Nicaragua. | Adriana will not be visiting Nicaragua. | Adriana will be visiting Managua. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Adriana will be visiting either Managua or somewhere in Nicaragua. However, as a matter of fact, Adriana will not be visiting Nicaragua.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Adriana will be visiting Managua. |
RULEBREAKER_0010052_rb | ds | cities | Amaia | she | will be visiting | Cuba | Havana | Amaia will be visiting either Havana or somewhere in Cuba. | Amaia will not be visiting Cuba. | Amaia will be visiting Havana. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Amaia will be visiting either Havana or somewhere in Cuba. However, as a matter of fact, Amaia will not be visiting Cuba.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Amaia will be visiting Havana. |
RULEBREAKER_0010053_rb | ds | cities | Bogdana | she | will be visiting | Angola | Luanda | Bogdana will be visiting either Luanda or somewhere in Angola. | Bogdana will not be visiting Angola. | Bogdana will be visiting Luanda. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Bogdana will be visiting either Luanda or somewhere in Angola. However, as a matter of fact, Bogdana will not be visiting Angola.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Bogdana will be visiting Luanda. |
RULEBREAKER_0010054_rb | ds | cities | Georgios | he | will be visiting | Mauritania | Nouakchott | Georgios will be visiting either Nouakchott or somewhere in Mauritania. | Georgios will not be visiting Mauritania. | Georgios will be visiting Nouakchott. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Georgios will be visiting either Nouakchott or somewhere in Mauritania. However, as a matter of fact, Georgios will not be visiting Mauritania.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Georgios will be visiting Nouakchott. |
RULEBREAKER_0010055_rb | ds | cities | Narek | he | will be visiting | Barbados | Bridgetown | Narek will be visiting either Bridgetown or somewhere in Barbados. | Narek will not be visiting Barbados. | Narek will be visiting Bridgetown. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Narek will be visiting either Bridgetown or somewhere in Barbados. However, as a matter of fact, Narek will not be visiting Barbados.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Narek will be visiting Bridgetown. |
RULEBREAKER_0010056_rb | ds | cities | Isla | she | will be visiting | Sweden | Stockholm | Isla will be visiting either Stockholm or somewhere in Sweden. | Isla will not be visiting Sweden. | Isla will be visiting Stockholm. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Isla will be visiting either Stockholm or somewhere in Sweden. However, as a matter of fact, Isla will not be visiting Sweden.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Isla will be visiting Stockholm. |
RULEBREAKER_0010057_rb | ds | cities | Mikaere | he | will be visiting | Jamaica | Kingston | Mikaere will be visiting either Kingston or somewhere in Jamaica. | Mikaere will not be visiting Jamaica. | Mikaere will be visiting Kingston. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Mikaere will be visiting either Kingston or somewhere in Jamaica. However, as a matter of fact, Mikaere will not be visiting Jamaica.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Mikaere will be visiting Kingston. |
RULEBREAKER_0010058_rb | ds | cities | Göktug | he | will be visiting | Mongolia | Ulaanbaatar | Göktug will be visiting either Ulaanbaatar or somewhere in Mongolia. | Göktug will not be visiting Mongolia. | Göktug will be visiting Ulaanbaatar. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Göktug will be visiting either Ulaanbaatar or somewhere in Mongolia. However, as a matter of fact, Göktug will not be visiting Mongolia.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Göktug will be visiting Ulaanbaatar. |
RULEBREAKER_0010059_rb | ds | cities | Paul | he | will be visiting | United States of America | Washington, D.C. | Paul will be visiting either Washington, D.C. or somewhere in United States of America. | Paul will not be visiting United States of America. | Paul will be visiting Washington, D.C.. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Paul will be visiting either Washington, D.C. or somewhere in United States of America. However, as a matter of fact, Paul will not be visiting United States of America.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Paul will be visiting Washington, D.C.. |
RULEBREAKER_0010060_rb | ds | cities | Adriana | she | had studied in | Zimbabwe | Harare | Adriana had studied in either Harare or somewhere in Zimbabwe. | Adriana had not studied in Zimbabwe. | Adriana had studied in Harare. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Adriana had studied in either Harare or somewhere in Zimbabwe. However, as a matter of fact, Adriana had not studied in Zimbabwe.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Adriana had studied in Harare. |
RULEBREAKER_0010061_rb | ds | cities | Amaia | she | had studied in | Antigua and Barbuda | Saint John's | Amaia had studied in either Saint John's or somewhere in Antigua and Barbuda. | Amaia had not studied in Antigua and Barbuda. | Amaia had studied in Saint John's. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Amaia had studied in either Saint John's or somewhere in Antigua and Barbuda. However, as a matter of fact, Amaia had not studied in Antigua and Barbuda.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Amaia had studied in Saint John's. |
RULEBREAKER_0010062_rb | ds | cities | Bogdana | she | had studied in | Madagascar | Antananarivo | Bogdana had studied in either Antananarivo or somewhere in Madagascar. | Bogdana had not studied in Madagascar. | Bogdana had studied in Antananarivo. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Bogdana had studied in either Antananarivo or somewhere in Madagascar. However, as a matter of fact, Bogdana had not studied in Madagascar.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Bogdana had studied in Antananarivo. |
RULEBREAKER_0010063_rb | ds | cities | Georgios | he | had studied in | Chile | Santiago | Georgios had studied in either Santiago or somewhere in Chile. | Georgios had not studied in Chile. | Georgios had studied in Santiago. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Georgios had studied in either Santiago or somewhere in Chile. However, as a matter of fact, Georgios had not studied in Chile.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Georgios had studied in Santiago. |
RULEBREAKER_0010064_rb | ds | cities | Narek | he | had studied in | Finland | Helsinki | Narek had studied in either Helsinki or somewhere in Finland. | Narek had not studied in Finland. | Narek had studied in Helsinki. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Narek had studied in either Helsinki or somewhere in Finland. However, as a matter of fact, Narek had not studied in Finland.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Narek had studied in Helsinki. |
RULEBREAKER_0010065_rb | ds | cities | Isla | she | had studied in | Saudi Arabia | Riyadh | Isla had studied in either Riyadh or somewhere in Saudi Arabia. | Isla had not studied in Saudi Arabia. | Isla had studied in Riyadh. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Isla had studied in either Riyadh or somewhere in Saudi Arabia. However, as a matter of fact, Isla had not studied in Saudi Arabia.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Isla had studied in Riyadh. |
RULEBREAKER_0010066_rb | ds | cities | Mikaere | he | had studied in | Central African Republic | Bangui | Mikaere had studied in either Bangui or somewhere in Central African Republic. | Mikaere had not studied in Central African Republic. | Mikaere had studied in Bangui. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Mikaere had studied in either Bangui or somewhere in Central African Republic. However, as a matter of fact, Mikaere had not studied in Central African Republic.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Mikaere had studied in Bangui. |
RULEBREAKER_0010067_rb | ds | cities | Göktug | he | had studied in | Ecuador | Quito | Göktug had studied in either Quito or somewhere in Ecuador. | Göktug had not studied in Ecuador. | Göktug had studied in Quito. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Göktug had studied in either Quito or somewhere in Ecuador. However, as a matter of fact, Göktug had not studied in Ecuador.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Göktug had studied in Quito. |
RULEBREAKER_0010068_rb | ds | cities | Paul | he | had studied in | Tanzania | Dodoma | Paul had studied in either Dodoma or somewhere in Tanzania. | Paul had not studied in Tanzania. | Paul had studied in Dodoma. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Paul had studied in either Dodoma or somewhere in Tanzania. However, as a matter of fact, Paul had not studied in Tanzania.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Paul had studied in Dodoma. |
RULEBREAKER_0010069_rb | ds | cities | Nuray | she | had studied in | Somalia | Mogadishu | Nuray had studied in either Mogadishu or somewhere in Somalia. | Nuray had not studied in Somalia. | Nuray had studied in Mogadishu. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Nuray had studied in either Mogadishu or somewhere in Somalia. However, as a matter of fact, Nuray had not studied in Somalia.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Nuray had studied in Mogadishu. |
RULEBREAKER_0010070_rb | ds | cities | Yua | she | had studied in | Malawi | Lilongwe | Yua had studied in either Lilongwe or somewhere in Malawi. | Yua had not studied in Malawi. | Yua had studied in Lilongwe. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Yua had studied in either Lilongwe or somewhere in Malawi. However, as a matter of fact, Yua had not studied in Malawi.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Yua had studied in Lilongwe. |
RULEBREAKER_0010071_rb | ds | cities | Lovely | she | had studied in | Botswana | Gaborone | Lovely had studied in either Gaborone or somewhere in Botswana. | Lovely had not studied in Botswana. | Lovely had studied in Gaborone. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Lovely had studied in either Gaborone or somewhere in Botswana. However, as a matter of fact, Lovely had not studied in Botswana.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Lovely had studied in Gaborone. |
RULEBREAKER_0010072_rb | ds | cities | Andrej | he | had studied in | Belize | Belmopan | Andrej had studied in either Belmopan or somewhere in Belize. | Andrej had not studied in Belize. | Andrej had studied in Belmopan. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Andrej had studied in either Belmopan or somewhere in Belize. However, as a matter of fact, Andrej had not studied in Belize.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Andrej had studied in Belmopan. |
RULEBREAKER_0010073_rb | ds | cities | Ilgar | he | had studied in | Senegal | Dakar | Ilgar had studied in either Dakar or somewhere in Senegal. | Ilgar had not studied in Senegal. | Ilgar had studied in Dakar. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Ilgar had studied in either Dakar or somewhere in Senegal. However, as a matter of fact, Ilgar had not studied in Senegal.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Ilgar had studied in Dakar. |
RULEBREAKER_0010074_rb | ds | cities | Aygun | she | had studied in | Samoa | Apia | Aygun had studied in either Apia or somewhere in Samoa. | Aygun had not studied in Samoa. | Aygun had studied in Apia. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Aygun had studied in either Apia or somewhere in Samoa. However, as a matter of fact, Aygun had not studied in Samoa.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Aygun had studied in Apia. |
RULEBREAKER_0010075_rb | ds | cities | Dominik | he | had studied in | Kiribati | South Tarawa | Dominik had studied in either South Tarawa or somewhere in Kiribati. | Dominik had not studied in Kiribati. | Dominik had studied in South Tarawa. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Dominik had studied in either South Tarawa or somewhere in Kiribati. However, as a matter of fact, Dominik had not studied in Kiribati.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Dominik had studied in South Tarawa. |
RULEBREAKER_0010076_rb | ds | cities | Aleksandr | he | had studied in | Solomon Islands | Honiara | Aleksandr had studied in either Honiara or somewhere in Solomon Islands. | Aleksandr had not studied in Solomon Islands. | Aleksandr had studied in Honiara. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Aleksandr had studied in either Honiara or somewhere in Solomon Islands. However, as a matter of fact, Aleksandr had not studied in Solomon Islands.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Aleksandr had studied in Honiara. |
RULEBREAKER_0010077_rb | ds | cities | Tess | she | had studied in | Lesotho | Maseru | Tess had studied in either Maseru or somewhere in Lesotho. | Tess had not studied in Lesotho. | Tess had studied in Maseru. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Tess had studied in either Maseru or somewhere in Lesotho. However, as a matter of fact, Tess had not studied in Lesotho.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Tess had studied in Maseru. |
RULEBREAKER_0010078_rb | ds | cities | Susanna | she | had studied in | The Bahamas | Nassau | Susanna had studied in either Nassau or somewhere in The Bahamas. | Susanna had not studied in The Bahamas. | Susanna had studied in Nassau. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Susanna had studied in either Nassau or somewhere in The Bahamas. However, as a matter of fact, Susanna had not studied in The Bahamas.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Susanna had studied in Nassau. |
RULEBREAKER_0010079_rb | ds | cities | Mahamadou | he | had studied in | Tunisia | Tunis | Mahamadou had studied in either Tunis or somewhere in Tunisia. | Mahamadou had not studied in Tunisia. | Mahamadou had studied in Tunis. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Mahamadou had studied in either Tunis or somewhere in Tunisia. However, as a matter of fact, Mahamadou had not studied in Tunisia.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Mahamadou had studied in Tunis. |
RULEBREAKER_0010080_rb | ds | cities | Tróndur | he | had studied in | Nepal | Kathmandu | Tróndur had studied in either Kathmandu or somewhere in Nepal. | Tróndur had not studied in Nepal. | Tróndur had studied in Kathmandu. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Tróndur had studied in either Kathmandu or somewhere in Nepal. However, as a matter of fact, Tróndur had not studied in Nepal.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Tróndur had studied in Kathmandu. |
RULEBREAKER_0010081_rb | ds | cities | Taha | he | had studied in | Qatar | Doha | Taha had studied in either Doha or somewhere in Qatar. | Taha had not studied in Qatar. | Taha had studied in Doha. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Taha had studied in either Doha or somewhere in Qatar. However, as a matter of fact, Taha had not studied in Qatar.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Taha had studied in Doha. |
RULEBREAKER_0010082_rb | ds | cities | Jökull | he | had studied in | Kazakhstan | Astana | Jökull had studied in either Astana or somewhere in Kazakhstan. | Jökull had not studied in Kazakhstan. | Jökull had studied in Astana. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Jökull had studied in either Astana or somewhere in Kazakhstan. However, as a matter of fact, Jökull had not studied in Kazakhstan.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Jökull had studied in Astana. |
RULEBREAKER_0010083_rb | ds | cities | Violeta | she | had studied in | East Timor | Dili | Violeta had studied in either Dili or somewhere in East Timor. | Violeta had not studied in East Timor. | Violeta had studied in Dili. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Violeta had studied in either Dili or somewhere in East Timor. However, as a matter of fact, Violeta had not studied in East Timor.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Violeta had studied in Dili. |
RULEBREAKER_0010084_rb | ds | cities | Hessa | she | had studied in | Malaysia | Kuala Lumpur | Hessa had studied in either Kuala Lumpur or somewhere in Malaysia. | Hessa had not studied in Malaysia. | Hessa had studied in Kuala Lumpur. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Hessa had studied in either Kuala Lumpur or somewhere in Malaysia. However, as a matter of fact, Hessa had not studied in Malaysia.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Hessa had studied in Kuala Lumpur. |
RULEBREAKER_0010085_rb | ds | cities | Umar | he | had studied in | Tonga | Nukuʻalofa | Umar had studied in either Nukuʻalofa or somewhere in Tonga. | Umar had not studied in Tonga. | Umar had studied in Nukuʻalofa. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Umar had studied in either Nukuʻalofa or somewhere in Tonga. However, as a matter of fact, Umar had not studied in Tonga.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Umar had studied in Nukuʻalofa. |
RULEBREAKER_0010086_rb | ds | cities | Marta | she | had studied in | Algeria | Algiers | Marta had studied in either Algiers or somewhere in Algeria. | Marta had not studied in Algeria. | Marta had studied in Algiers. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Marta had studied in either Algiers or somewhere in Algeria. However, as a matter of fact, Marta had not studied in Algeria.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Marta had studied in Algiers. |
RULEBREAKER_0010087_rb | ds | cities | Vusala | she | had studied in | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Kingstown | Vusala had studied in either Kingstown or somewhere in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. | Vusala had not studied in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. | Vusala had studied in Kingstown. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Vusala had studied in either Kingstown or somewhere in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. However, as a matter of fact, Vusala had not studied in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Vusala had studied in Kingstown. |
RULEBREAKER_0010088_rb | ds | cities | Aadhya | she | had studied in | Egypt | Cairo | Aadhya had studied in either Cairo or somewhere in Egypt. | Aadhya had not studied in Egypt. | Aadhya had studied in Cairo. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Aadhya had studied in either Cairo or somewhere in Egypt. However, as a matter of fact, Aadhya had not studied in Egypt.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Aadhya had studied in Cairo. |
RULEBREAKER_0010089_rb | ds | cities | Lazar | he | had studied in | Trinidad and Tobago | Port of Spain | Lazar had studied in either Port of Spain or somewhere in Trinidad and Tobago. | Lazar had not studied in Trinidad and Tobago. | Lazar had studied in Port of Spain. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Lazar had studied in either Port of Spain or somewhere in Trinidad and Tobago. However, as a matter of fact, Lazar had not studied in Trinidad and Tobago.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Lazar had studied in Port of Spain. |
RULEBREAKER_0010090_rb | ds | cities | Emiliya | she | had studied in | Liechtenstein | Vaduz | Emiliya had studied in either Vaduz or somewhere in Liechtenstein. | Emiliya had not studied in Liechtenstein. | Emiliya had studied in Vaduz. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Emiliya had studied in either Vaduz or somewhere in Liechtenstein. However, as a matter of fact, Emiliya had not studied in Liechtenstein.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Emiliya had studied in Vaduz. |
RULEBREAKER_0010091_rb | ds | cities | Gamalat | she | had studied in | Morocco | Rabat | Gamalat had studied in either Rabat or somewhere in Morocco. | Gamalat had not studied in Morocco. | Gamalat had studied in Rabat. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Gamalat had studied in either Rabat or somewhere in Morocco. However, as a matter of fact, Gamalat had not studied in Morocco.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Gamalat had studied in Rabat. |
RULEBREAKER_0010092_rb | ds | cities | Shristi | she | had studied in | Suriname | Paramaribo | Shristi had studied in either Paramaribo or somewhere in Suriname. | Shristi had not studied in Suriname. | Shristi had studied in Paramaribo. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Shristi had studied in either Paramaribo or somewhere in Suriname. However, as a matter of fact, Shristi had not studied in Suriname.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Shristi had studied in Paramaribo. |
RULEBREAKER_0010093_rb | ds | cities | Adrians | he | had studied in | Equatorial Guinea | Malabo | Adrians had studied in either Malabo or somewhere in Equatorial Guinea. | Adrians had not studied in Equatorial Guinea. | Adrians had studied in Malabo. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Adrians had studied in either Malabo or somewhere in Equatorial Guinea. However, as a matter of fact, Adrians had not studied in Equatorial Guinea.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Adrians had studied in Malabo. |
RULEBREAKER_0010094_rb | ds | cities | Gevorg | he | had studied in | Cape Verde | Praia | Gevorg had studied in either Praia or somewhere in Cape Verde. | Gevorg had not studied in Cape Verde. | Gevorg had studied in Praia. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Gevorg had studied in either Praia or somewhere in Cape Verde. However, as a matter of fact, Gevorg had not studied in Cape Verde.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Gevorg had studied in Praia. |
RULEBREAKER_0010095_rb | ds | cities | Heikapu | she | had studied in | Uzbekistan | Tashkent | Heikapu had studied in either Tashkent or somewhere in Uzbekistan. | Heikapu had not studied in Uzbekistan. | Heikapu had studied in Tashkent. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Heikapu had studied in either Tashkent or somewhere in Uzbekistan. However, as a matter of fact, Heikapu had not studied in Uzbekistan.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Heikapu had studied in Tashkent. |
RULEBREAKER_0010096_rb | ds | cities | Shams | she | had studied in | United Arab Emirates | Abu Dhabi | Shams had studied in either Abu Dhabi or somewhere in United Arab Emirates. | Shams had not studied in United Arab Emirates. | Shams had studied in Abu Dhabi. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Shams had studied in either Abu Dhabi or somewhere in United Arab Emirates. However, as a matter of fact, Shams had not studied in United Arab Emirates.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Shams had studied in Abu Dhabi. |
RULEBREAKER_0010097_rb | ds | cities | Rosmery | she | had studied in | Niger | Niamey | Rosmery had studied in either Niamey or somewhere in Niger. | Rosmery had not studied in Niger. | Rosmery had studied in Niamey. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Rosmery had studied in either Niamey or somewhere in Niger. However, as a matter of fact, Rosmery had not studied in Niger.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Rosmery had studied in Niamey. |
RULEBREAKER_0010098_rb | ds | cities | Selim | he | had studied in | Turkey | Ankara | Selim had studied in either Ankara or somewhere in Turkey. | Selim had not studied in Turkey. | Selim had studied in Ankara. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Selim had studied in either Ankara or somewhere in Turkey. However, as a matter of fact, Selim had not studied in Turkey.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Selim had studied in Ankara. |
RULEBREAKER_0010099_rb | ds | cities | Giorgi | he | had studied in | Iran | Tehran | Giorgi had studied in either Tehran or somewhere in Iran. | Giorgi had not studied in Iran. | Giorgi had studied in Tehran. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Giorgi had studied in either Tehran or somewhere in Iran. However, as a matter of fact, Giorgi had not studied in Iran.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Giorgi had studied in Tehran. |
RULEBREAKER_0010100_rb | ds | cities | Melokuhle | she | had studied in | Papua New Guinea | Port Moresby | Melokuhle had studied in either Port Moresby or somewhere in Papua New Guinea. | Melokuhle had not studied in Papua New Guinea. | Melokuhle had studied in Port Moresby. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Melokuhle had studied in either Port Moresby or somewhere in Papua New Guinea. However, as a matter of fact, Melokuhle had not studied in Papua New Guinea.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Melokuhle had studied in Port Moresby. |
RULEBREAKER_0010101_rb | ds | cities | Aþena | she | had studied in | Paraguay | Asunción | Aþena had studied in either Asunción or somewhere in Paraguay. | Aþena had not studied in Paraguay. | Aþena had studied in Asunción. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Aþena had studied in either Asunción or somewhere in Paraguay. However, as a matter of fact, Aþena had not studied in Paraguay.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Aþena had studied in Asunción. |
RULEBREAKER_0010102_rb | ds | cities | Mahesh | he | had studied in | The Gambia | Banjul | Mahesh had studied in either Banjul or somewhere in The Gambia. | Mahesh had not studied in The Gambia. | Mahesh had studied in Banjul. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Mahesh had studied in either Banjul or somewhere in The Gambia. However, as a matter of fact, Mahesh had not studied in The Gambia.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Mahesh had studied in Banjul. |
RULEBREAKER_0010103_rb | ds | cities | Ha-eun | she | had studied in | Kyrgyzstan | Bishkek | Ha-eun had studied in either Bishkek or somewhere in Kyrgyzstan. | Ha-eun had not studied in Kyrgyzstan. | Ha-eun had studied in Bishkek. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Ha-eun had studied in either Bishkek or somewhere in Kyrgyzstan. However, as a matter of fact, Ha-eun had not studied in Kyrgyzstan.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Ha-eun had studied in Bishkek. |
RULEBREAKER_0010104_rb | ds | cities | Victoria | she | had studied in | Lebanon | Beirut | Victoria had studied in either Beirut or somewhere in Lebanon. | Victoria had not studied in Lebanon. | Victoria had studied in Beirut. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Victoria had studied in either Beirut or somewhere in Lebanon. However, as a matter of fact, Victoria had not studied in Lebanon.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Victoria had studied in Beirut. |
RULEBREAKER_0010105_rb | ds | cities | Anna | she | had studied in | India | New Delhi | Anna had studied in either New Delhi or somewhere in India. | Anna had not studied in India. | Anna had studied in New Delhi. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Anna had studied in either New Delhi or somewhere in India. However, as a matter of fact, Anna had not studied in India.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Anna had studied in New Delhi. |
RULEBREAKER_0010106_rb | ds | cities | Felix | he | had studied in | Marshall Islands | Majuro | Felix had studied in either Majuro or somewhere in Marshall Islands. | Felix had not studied in Marshall Islands. | Felix had studied in Majuro. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Felix had studied in either Majuro or somewhere in Marshall Islands. However, as a matter of fact, Felix had not studied in Marshall Islands.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Felix had studied in Majuro. |
RULEBREAKER_0010107_rb | ds | cities | Catalina | she | had studied in | Honduras | Tegucigalpa | Catalina had studied in either Tegucigalpa or somewhere in Honduras. | Catalina had not studied in Honduras. | Catalina had studied in Tegucigalpa. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Catalina had studied in either Tegucigalpa or somewhere in Honduras. However, as a matter of fact, Catalina had not studied in Honduras.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Catalina had studied in Tegucigalpa. |
RULEBREAKER_0010108_rb | ds | cities | Hussain | he | had studied in | Germany | Berlin | Hussain had studied in either Berlin or somewhere in Germany. | Hussain had not studied in Germany. | Hussain had studied in Berlin. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Hussain had studied in either Berlin or somewhere in Germany. However, as a matter of fact, Hussain had not studied in Germany.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Hussain had studied in Berlin. |
RULEBREAKER_0010109_rb | ds | cities | Yasmine | she | had studied in | Croatia | Zagreb | Yasmine had studied in either Zagreb or somewhere in Croatia. | Yasmine had not studied in Croatia. | Yasmine had studied in Zagreb. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Yasmine had studied in either Zagreb or somewhere in Croatia. However, as a matter of fact, Yasmine had not studied in Croatia.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Yasmine had studied in Zagreb. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.