jason-c/rulebreakers · Datasets at Hugging Face

id stringlengths 22 25	rulebreaker_type stringclasses 2 values	category stringclasses 9 values	firstName stringlengths 2 16	pronoun stringclasses 2 values	verb stringclasses 12 values	entityA stringclasses 191 values	entityB stringclasses 307 values	premise1 stringlengths 42 102	premise2 stringlengths 14 63	conclusion stringlengths 14 63	label bool 2 classes	kc_gen_formatted_prompt stringlengths 278 375	target_correct_conclusion stringlengths 14 62	target_incorrect_conclusion stringlengths 14 63
RULEBREAKER_0010210_rb	ds	cities	Alessandro	he	had studied in	Costa Rica	San José	Alessandro had studied in either San José or somewhere in Costa Rica.	Alessandro had not studied in Costa Rica.	Alessandro had studied in San José.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Alessandro had studied in either San José or somewhere in Costa Rica. However, as a matter of fact, Alessandro had not studied in Costa Rica. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Alessandro had studied in San José.
RULEBREAKER_0010211_rb	ds	cities	Elena	she	had studied in	Guatemala	Guatemala City	Elena had studied in either Guatemala City or somewhere in Guatemala.	Elena had not studied in Guatemala.	Elena had studied in Guatemala City.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Elena had studied in either Guatemala City or somewhere in Guatemala. However, as a matter of fact, Elena had not studied in Guatemala. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Elena had studied in Guatemala City.
RULEBREAKER_0010212_rb	ds	cities	Josip	he	had studied in	United Kingdom	London	Josip had studied in either London or somewhere in United Kingdom.	Josip had not studied in United Kingdom.	Josip had studied in London.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Josip had studied in either London or somewhere in United Kingdom. However, as a matter of fact, Josip had not studied in United Kingdom. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Josip had studied in London.
RULEBREAKER_0010213_rb	ds	cities	Helma	she	had studied in	Haiti	Port-au-Prince	Helma had studied in either Port-au-Prince or somewhere in Haiti.	Helma had not studied in Haiti.	Helma had studied in Port-au-Prince.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Helma had studied in either Port-au-Prince or somewhere in Haiti. However, as a matter of fact, Helma had not studied in Haiti. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Helma had studied in Port-au-Prince.
RULEBREAKER_0010214_rb	ds	cities	Elija	she	had studied in	Libya	Tripoli	Elija had studied in either Tripoli or somewhere in Libya.	Elija had not studied in Libya.	Elija had studied in Tripoli.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Elija had studied in either Tripoli or somewhere in Libya. However, as a matter of fact, Elija had not studied in Libya. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Elija had studied in Tripoli.
RULEBREAKER_0010215_rb	ds	cities	Maitê	she	had studied in	Fiji	Suva	Maitê had studied in either Suva or somewhere in Fiji.	Maitê had not studied in Fiji.	Maitê had studied in Suva.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Maitê had studied in either Suva or somewhere in Fiji. However, as a matter of fact, Maitê had not studied in Fiji. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Maitê had studied in Suva.
RULEBREAKER_0010216_rb	ds	cities	Charlie	he	had studied in	Georgia	Tbilisi	Charlie had studied in either Tbilisi or somewhere in Georgia.	Charlie had not studied in Georgia.	Charlie had studied in Tbilisi.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Charlie had studied in either Tbilisi or somewhere in Georgia. However, as a matter of fact, Charlie had not studied in Georgia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Charlie had studied in Tbilisi.
RULEBREAKER_0010217_rb	ds	cities	Ricardo	he	had studied in	Lithuania	Vilnius	Ricardo had studied in either Vilnius or somewhere in Lithuania.	Ricardo had not studied in Lithuania.	Ricardo had studied in Vilnius.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ricardo had studied in either Vilnius or somewhere in Lithuania. However, as a matter of fact, Ricardo had not studied in Lithuania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ricardo had studied in Vilnius.
RULEBREAKER_0010218_rb	ds	cities	Minato	he	had studied in	France	Paris	Minato had studied in either Paris or somewhere in France.	Minato had not studied in France.	Minato had studied in Paris.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Minato had studied in either Paris or somewhere in France. However, as a matter of fact, Minato had not studied in France. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Minato had studied in Paris.
RULEBREAKER_0010219_rb	ds	cities	Sophie	she	had studied in	Iraq	Baghdad	Sophie had studied in either Baghdad or somewhere in Iraq.	Sophie had not studied in Iraq.	Sophie had studied in Baghdad.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Sophie had studied in either Baghdad or somewhere in Iraq. However, as a matter of fact, Sophie had not studied in Iraq. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Sophie had studied in Baghdad.
RULEBREAKER_0010220_rb	ds	cities	Reina	she	had studied in	Dominica	Roseau	Reina had studied in either Roseau or somewhere in Dominica.	Reina had not studied in Dominica.	Reina had studied in Roseau.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Reina had studied in either Roseau or somewhere in Dominica. However, as a matter of fact, Reina had not studied in Dominica. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Reina had studied in Roseau.
RULEBREAKER_0010221_rb	ds	cities	Aria	she	had studied in	Oman	Muscat	Aria had studied in either Muscat or somewhere in Oman.	Aria had not studied in Oman.	Aria had studied in Muscat.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Aria had studied in either Muscat or somewhere in Oman. However, as a matter of fact, Aria had not studied in Oman. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Aria had studied in Muscat.
RULEBREAKER_0010222_rb	ds	cities	Pari	she	had studied in	Thailand	Bangkok	Pari had studied in either Bangkok or somewhere in Thailand.	Pari had not studied in Thailand.	Pari had studied in Bangkok.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Pari had studied in either Bangkok or somewhere in Thailand. However, as a matter of fact, Pari had not studied in Thailand. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Pari had studied in Bangkok.
RULEBREAKER_0010223_rb	ds	cities	Joel	he	had studied in	Slovakia	Bratislava	Joel had studied in either Bratislava or somewhere in Slovakia.	Joel had not studied in Slovakia.	Joel had studied in Bratislava.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Joel had studied in either Bratislava or somewhere in Slovakia. However, as a matter of fact, Joel had not studied in Slovakia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Joel had studied in Bratislava.
RULEBREAKER_0010224_rb	ds	cities	Mareva	she	had studied in	Czech Republic	Prague	Mareva had studied in either Prague or somewhere in Czech Republic.	Mareva had not studied in Czech Republic.	Mareva had studied in Prague.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Mareva had studied in either Prague or somewhere in Czech Republic. However, as a matter of fact, Mareva had not studied in Czech Republic. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mareva had studied in Prague.
RULEBREAKER_0010225_rb	ds	cities	Oumou	she	had studied in	Spain	Madrid	Oumou had studied in either Madrid or somewhere in Spain.	Oumou had not studied in Spain.	Oumou had studied in Madrid.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Oumou had studied in either Madrid or somewhere in Spain. However, as a matter of fact, Oumou had not studied in Spain. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Oumou had studied in Madrid.
RULEBREAKER_0010226_rb	ds	cities	Baran	she	had studied in	Austria	Vienna	Baran had studied in either Vienna or somewhere in Austria.	Baran had not studied in Austria.	Baran had studied in Vienna.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Baran had studied in either Vienna or somewhere in Austria. However, as a matter of fact, Baran had not studied in Austria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Baran had studied in Vienna.
RULEBREAKER_0010227_rb	ds	cities	Fatma	she	had studied in	Indonesia	Jakarta	Fatma had studied in either Jakarta or somewhere in Indonesia.	Fatma had not studied in Indonesia.	Fatma had studied in Jakarta.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Fatma had studied in either Jakarta or somewhere in Indonesia. However, as a matter of fact, Fatma had not studied in Indonesia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Fatma had studied in Jakarta.
RULEBREAKER_0010228_rb	ds	cities	Miguel	he	had studied in	Pakistan	Islamabad	Miguel had studied in either Islamabad or somewhere in Pakistan.	Miguel had not studied in Pakistan.	Miguel had studied in Islamabad.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Miguel had studied in either Islamabad or somewhere in Pakistan. However, as a matter of fact, Miguel had not studied in Pakistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Miguel had studied in Islamabad.
RULEBREAKER_0010229_rb	ds	cities	Lilja	she	had studied in	Brazil	Brasília	Lilja had studied in either Brasília or somewhere in Brazil.	Lilja had not studied in Brazil.	Lilja had studied in Brasília.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lilja had studied in either Brasília or somewhere in Brazil. However, as a matter of fact, Lilja had not studied in Brazil. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lilja had studied in Brasília.
RULEBREAKER_0010230_rb	ds	cities	Katerina	she	had studied in	Belgium	City of Brussels	Katerina had studied in either City of Brussels or somewhere in Belgium.	Katerina had not studied in Belgium.	Katerina had studied in City of Brussels.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Katerina had studied in either City of Brussels or somewhere in Belgium. However, as a matter of fact, Katerina had not studied in Belgium. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Katerina had studied in City of Brussels.
RULEBREAKER_0010231_rb	ds	cities	Valeria	she	had studied in	Tajikistan	Dushanbe	Valeria had studied in either Dushanbe or somewhere in Tajikistan.	Valeria had not studied in Tajikistan.	Valeria had studied in Dushanbe.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Valeria had studied in either Dushanbe or somewhere in Tajikistan. However, as a matter of fact, Valeria had not studied in Tajikistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Valeria had studied in Dushanbe.
RULEBREAKER_0010232_rb	ds	cities	Widelene	she	had studied in	North Macedonia	Skopje	Widelene had studied in either Skopje or somewhere in North Macedonia.	Widelene had not studied in North Macedonia.	Widelene had studied in Skopje.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Widelene had studied in either Skopje or somewhere in North Macedonia. However, as a matter of fact, Widelene had not studied in North Macedonia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Widelene had studied in Skopje.
RULEBREAKER_0010233_rb	ds	cities	Anastasia	she	had studied in	Mozambique	Maputo	Anastasia had studied in either Maputo or somewhere in Mozambique.	Anastasia had not studied in Mozambique.	Anastasia had studied in Maputo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Anastasia had studied in either Maputo or somewhere in Mozambique. However, as a matter of fact, Anastasia had not studied in Mozambique. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Anastasia had studied in Maputo.
RULEBREAKER_0010234_rb	ds	cities	Evens	he	had studied in	Nicaragua	Managua	Evens had studied in either Managua or somewhere in Nicaragua.	Evens had not studied in Nicaragua.	Evens had studied in Managua.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Evens had studied in either Managua or somewhere in Nicaragua. However, as a matter of fact, Evens had not studied in Nicaragua. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Evens had studied in Managua.
RULEBREAKER_0010235_rb	ds	cities	Abubakr	he	had studied in	Cuba	Havana	Abubakr had studied in either Havana or somewhere in Cuba.	Abubakr had not studied in Cuba.	Abubakr had studied in Havana.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Abubakr had studied in either Havana or somewhere in Cuba. However, as a matter of fact, Abubakr had not studied in Cuba. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Abubakr had studied in Havana.
RULEBREAKER_0010236_rb	ds	cities	Jēkabs	he	had studied in	Angola	Luanda	Jēkabs had studied in either Luanda or somewhere in Angola.	Jēkabs had not studied in Angola.	Jēkabs had studied in Luanda.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Jēkabs had studied in either Luanda or somewhere in Angola. However, as a matter of fact, Jēkabs had not studied in Angola. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Jēkabs had studied in Luanda.
RULEBREAKER_0010237_rb	ds	cities	Christina	she	had studied in	Mauritania	Nouakchott	Christina had studied in either Nouakchott or somewhere in Mauritania.	Christina had not studied in Mauritania.	Christina had studied in Nouakchott.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Christina had studied in either Nouakchott or somewhere in Mauritania. However, as a matter of fact, Christina had not studied in Mauritania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Christina had studied in Nouakchott.
RULEBREAKER_0010238_rb	ds	cities	Zoran	he	had studied in	Barbados	Bridgetown	Zoran had studied in either Bridgetown or somewhere in Barbados.	Zoran had not studied in Barbados.	Zoran had studied in Bridgetown.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Zoran had studied in either Bridgetown or somewhere in Barbados. However, as a matter of fact, Zoran had not studied in Barbados. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Zoran had studied in Bridgetown.
RULEBREAKER_0010239_rb	ds	cities	Awa	she	had studied in	Sweden	Stockholm	Awa had studied in either Stockholm or somewhere in Sweden.	Awa had not studied in Sweden.	Awa had studied in Stockholm.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Awa had studied in either Stockholm or somewhere in Sweden. However, as a matter of fact, Awa had not studied in Sweden. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Awa had studied in Stockholm.
RULEBREAKER_0010240_rb	ds	cities	Safija	she	had studied in	Jamaica	Kingston	Safija had studied in either Kingston or somewhere in Jamaica.	Safija had not studied in Jamaica.	Safija had studied in Kingston.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Safija had studied in either Kingston or somewhere in Jamaica. However, as a matter of fact, Safija had not studied in Jamaica. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Safija had studied in Kingston.
RULEBREAKER_0010241_rb	ds	cities	Haruto	he	had studied in	Mongolia	Ulaanbaatar	Haruto had studied in either Ulaanbaatar or somewhere in Mongolia.	Haruto had not studied in Mongolia.	Haruto had studied in Ulaanbaatar.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Haruto had studied in either Ulaanbaatar or somewhere in Mongolia. However, as a matter of fact, Haruto had not studied in Mongolia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Haruto had studied in Ulaanbaatar.
RULEBREAKER_0010242_rb	ds	cities	Miraç	he	had studied in	United States of America	Washington, D.C.	Miraç had studied in either Washington, D.C. or somewhere in United States of America.	Miraç had not studied in United States of America.	Miraç had studied in Washington, D.C..	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Miraç had studied in either Washington, D.C. or somewhere in United States of America. However, as a matter of fact, Miraç had not studied in United States of America. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Miraç had studied in Washington, D.C..
RULEBREAKER_0010243_rb	ds	cities	Martín	he	had studied in	Zimbabwe	Harare	Martín had studied in either Harare or somewhere in Zimbabwe.	Martín had not studied in Zimbabwe.	Martín had studied in Harare.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Martín had studied in either Harare or somewhere in Zimbabwe. However, as a matter of fact, Martín had not studied in Zimbabwe. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Martín had studied in Harare.
RULEBREAKER_0010244_rb	ds	cities	Vicente	he	had studied in	Antigua and Barbuda	Saint John's	Vicente had studied in either Saint John's or somewhere in Antigua and Barbuda.	Vicente had not studied in Antigua and Barbuda.	Vicente had studied in Saint John's.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Vicente had studied in either Saint John's or somewhere in Antigua and Barbuda. However, as a matter of fact, Vicente had not studied in Antigua and Barbuda. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Vicente had studied in Saint John's.
RULEBREAKER_0010245_rb	ds	cities	Dalal	she	had studied in	Madagascar	Antananarivo	Dalal had studied in either Antananarivo or somewhere in Madagascar.	Dalal had not studied in Madagascar.	Dalal had studied in Antananarivo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Dalal had studied in either Antananarivo or somewhere in Madagascar. However, as a matter of fact, Dalal had not studied in Madagascar. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Dalal had studied in Antananarivo.
RULEBREAKER_0010246_rb	ds	cities	Marcell	he	had studied in	Chile	Santiago	Marcell had studied in either Santiago or somewhere in Chile.	Marcell had not studied in Chile.	Marcell had studied in Santiago.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Marcell had studied in either Santiago or somewhere in Chile. However, as a matter of fact, Marcell had not studied in Chile. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Marcell had studied in Santiago.
RULEBREAKER_0010247_rb	ds	cities	Azora Kiara	she	had studied in	Finland	Helsinki	Azora Kiara had studied in either Helsinki or somewhere in Finland.	Azora Kiara had not studied in Finland.	Azora Kiara had studied in Helsinki.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Azora Kiara had studied in either Helsinki or somewhere in Finland. However, as a matter of fact, Azora Kiara had not studied in Finland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Azora Kiara had studied in Helsinki.
RULEBREAKER_0010248_rb	ds	cities	Teiki	he	had studied in	Saudi Arabia	Riyadh	Teiki had studied in either Riyadh or somewhere in Saudi Arabia.	Teiki had not studied in Saudi Arabia.	Teiki had studied in Riyadh.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Teiki had studied in either Riyadh or somewhere in Saudi Arabia. However, as a matter of fact, Teiki had not studied in Saudi Arabia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Teiki had studied in Riyadh.
RULEBREAKER_0010249_rb	ds	cities	Ellen	she	had studied in	Central African Republic	Bangui	Ellen had studied in either Bangui or somewhere in Central African Republic.	Ellen had not studied in Central African Republic.	Ellen had studied in Bangui.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ellen had studied in either Bangui or somewhere in Central African Republic. However, as a matter of fact, Ellen had not studied in Central African Republic. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ellen had studied in Bangui.
RULEBREAKER_0010250_rb	ds	cities	Tadhg	he	had studied in	Ecuador	Quito	Tadhg had studied in either Quito or somewhere in Ecuador.	Tadhg had not studied in Ecuador.	Tadhg had studied in Quito.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Tadhg had studied in either Quito or somewhere in Ecuador. However, as a matter of fact, Tadhg had not studied in Ecuador. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Tadhg had studied in Quito.
RULEBREAKER_0010251_rb	ds	cities	Doha	she	had studied in	Tanzania	Dodoma	Doha had studied in either Dodoma or somewhere in Tanzania.	Doha had not studied in Tanzania.	Doha had studied in Dodoma.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Doha had studied in either Dodoma or somewhere in Tanzania. However, as a matter of fact, Doha had not studied in Tanzania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Doha had studied in Dodoma.
RULEBREAKER_0010252_rb	ds	cities	Esma	she	had studied in	Somalia	Mogadishu	Esma had studied in either Mogadishu or somewhere in Somalia.	Esma had not studied in Somalia.	Esma had studied in Mogadishu.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Esma had studied in either Mogadishu or somewhere in Somalia. However, as a matter of fact, Esma had not studied in Somalia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Esma had studied in Mogadishu.
RULEBREAKER_0010253_rb	ds	cities	Xīnyí	she	had studied in	Malawi	Lilongwe	Xīnyí had studied in either Lilongwe or somewhere in Malawi.	Xīnyí had not studied in Malawi.	Xīnyí had studied in Lilongwe.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Xīnyí had studied in either Lilongwe or somewhere in Malawi. However, as a matter of fact, Xīnyí had not studied in Malawi. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Xīnyí had studied in Lilongwe.
RULEBREAKER_0010254_rb	ds	cities	Jana	she	had studied in	Botswana	Gaborone	Jana had studied in either Gaborone or somewhere in Botswana.	Jana had not studied in Botswana.	Jana had studied in Gaborone.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Jana had studied in either Gaborone or somewhere in Botswana. However, as a matter of fact, Jana had not studied in Botswana. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Jana had studied in Gaborone.
RULEBREAKER_0010255_rb	ds	cities	Barbare	she	had studied in	Belize	Belmopan	Barbare had studied in either Belmopan or somewhere in Belize.	Barbare had not studied in Belize.	Barbare had studied in Belmopan.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Barbare had studied in either Belmopan or somewhere in Belize. However, as a matter of fact, Barbare had not studied in Belize. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Barbare had studied in Belmopan.
RULEBREAKER_0010256_rb	ds	cities	Elyas	he	had studied in	Senegal	Dakar	Elyas had studied in either Dakar or somewhere in Senegal.	Elyas had not studied in Senegal.	Elyas had studied in Dakar.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Elyas had studied in either Dakar or somewhere in Senegal. However, as a matter of fact, Elyas had not studied in Senegal. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Elyas had studied in Dakar.
RULEBREAKER_0010257_rb	ds	cities	Jessica	she	had studied in	Samoa	Apia	Jessica had studied in either Apia or somewhere in Samoa.	Jessica had not studied in Samoa.	Jessica had studied in Apia.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Jessica had studied in either Apia or somewhere in Samoa. However, as a matter of fact, Jessica had not studied in Samoa. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Jessica had studied in Apia.
RULEBREAKER_0010258_rb	ds	cities	Rin	she	had studied in	Kiribati	South Tarawa	Rin had studied in either South Tarawa or somewhere in Kiribati.	Rin had not studied in Kiribati.	Rin had studied in South Tarawa.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Rin had studied in either South Tarawa or somewhere in Kiribati. However, as a matter of fact, Rin had not studied in Kiribati. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Rin had studied in South Tarawa.
RULEBREAKER_0010259_rb	ds	cities	Karine	she	had studied in	Solomon Islands	Honiara	Karine had studied in either Honiara or somewhere in Solomon Islands.	Karine had not studied in Solomon Islands.	Karine had studied in Honiara.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Karine had studied in either Honiara or somewhere in Solomon Islands. However, as a matter of fact, Karine had not studied in Solomon Islands. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Karine had studied in Honiara.
RULEBREAKER_0010260_rb	ds	cities	Clara	she	had studied in	Lesotho	Maseru	Clara had studied in either Maseru or somewhere in Lesotho.	Clara had not studied in Lesotho.	Clara had studied in Maseru.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Clara had studied in either Maseru or somewhere in Lesotho. However, as a matter of fact, Clara had not studied in Lesotho. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Clara had studied in Maseru.
RULEBREAKER_0010261_rb	ds	cities	Delfina	she	had studied in	The Bahamas	Nassau	Delfina had studied in either Nassau or somewhere in The Bahamas.	Delfina had not studied in The Bahamas.	Delfina had studied in Nassau.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Delfina had studied in either Nassau or somewhere in The Bahamas. However, as a matter of fact, Delfina had not studied in The Bahamas. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Delfina had studied in Nassau.
RULEBREAKER_0010262_rb	ds	cities	Chloe	she	had studied in	Tunisia	Tunis	Chloe had studied in either Tunis or somewhere in Tunisia.	Chloe had not studied in Tunisia.	Chloe had studied in Tunis.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Chloe had studied in either Tunis or somewhere in Tunisia. However, as a matter of fact, Chloe had not studied in Tunisia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Chloe had studied in Tunis.
RULEBREAKER_0010263_rb	ds	cities	Azaria	she	had studied in	Nepal	Kathmandu	Azaria had studied in either Kathmandu or somewhere in Nepal.	Azaria had not studied in Nepal.	Azaria had studied in Kathmandu.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Azaria had studied in either Kathmandu or somewhere in Nepal. However, as a matter of fact, Azaria had not studied in Nepal. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Azaria had studied in Kathmandu.
RULEBREAKER_0010264_rb	ds	cities	Niel	he	had studied in	Qatar	Doha	Niel had studied in either Doha or somewhere in Qatar.	Niel had not studied in Qatar.	Niel had studied in Doha.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Niel had studied in either Doha or somewhere in Qatar. However, as a matter of fact, Niel had not studied in Qatar. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Niel had studied in Doha.
RULEBREAKER_0010265_rb	ds	cities	Amayra	she	had studied in	Kazakhstan	Astana	Amayra had studied in either Astana or somewhere in Kazakhstan.	Amayra had not studied in Kazakhstan.	Amayra had studied in Astana.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Amayra had studied in either Astana or somewhere in Kazakhstan. However, as a matter of fact, Amayra had not studied in Kazakhstan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Amayra had studied in Astana.
RULEBREAKER_0010266_rb	ds	cities	Regina	she	had studied in	East Timor	Dili	Regina had studied in either Dili or somewhere in East Timor.	Regina had not studied in East Timor.	Regina had studied in Dili.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Regina had studied in either Dili or somewhere in East Timor. However, as a matter of fact, Regina had not studied in East Timor. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Regina had studied in Dili.
RULEBREAKER_0010267_rb	ds	cities	Damian	he	had studied in	Malaysia	Kuala Lumpur	Damian had studied in either Kuala Lumpur or somewhere in Malaysia.	Damian had not studied in Malaysia.	Damian had studied in Kuala Lumpur.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Damian had studied in either Kuala Lumpur or somewhere in Malaysia. However, as a matter of fact, Damian had not studied in Malaysia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Damian had studied in Kuala Lumpur.
RULEBREAKER_0010268_rb	ds	cities	Gunay	she	had studied in	Tonga	Nukuʻalofa	Gunay had studied in either Nukuʻalofa or somewhere in Tonga.	Gunay had not studied in Tonga.	Gunay had studied in Nukuʻalofa.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Gunay had studied in either Nukuʻalofa or somewhere in Tonga. However, as a matter of fact, Gunay had not studied in Tonga. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Gunay had studied in Nukuʻalofa.
RULEBREAKER_0010269_rb	ds	cities	Sára	she	had studied in	Algeria	Algiers	Sára had studied in either Algiers or somewhere in Algeria.	Sára had not studied in Algeria.	Sára had studied in Algiers.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Sára had studied in either Algiers or somewhere in Algeria. However, as a matter of fact, Sára had not studied in Algeria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Sára had studied in Algiers.
RULEBREAKER_0010270_rb	ds	cities	Daniil	he	had studied in	Saint Vincent and the Grenadines	Kingstown	Daniil had studied in either Kingstown or somewhere in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.	Daniil had not studied in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.	Daniil had studied in Kingstown.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Daniil had studied in either Kingstown or somewhere in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. However, as a matter of fact, Daniil had not studied in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Daniil had studied in Kingstown.
RULEBREAKER_0010271_rb	ds	cities	Latifa	she	had studied in	Egypt	Cairo	Latifa had studied in either Cairo or somewhere in Egypt.	Latifa had not studied in Egypt.	Latifa had studied in Cairo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Latifa had studied in either Cairo or somewhere in Egypt. However, as a matter of fact, Latifa had not studied in Egypt. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Latifa had studied in Cairo.
RULEBREAKER_0010272_rb	ds	cities	William	he	had studied in	Trinidad and Tobago	Port of Spain	William had studied in either Port of Spain or somewhere in Trinidad and Tobago.	William had not studied in Trinidad and Tobago.	William had studied in Port of Spain.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that William had studied in either Port of Spain or somewhere in Trinidad and Tobago. However, as a matter of fact, William had not studied in Trinidad and Tobago. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	William had studied in Port of Spain.
RULEBREAKER_0010273_rb	ds	cities	Kevin	he	had studied in	Liechtenstein	Vaduz	Kevin had studied in either Vaduz or somewhere in Liechtenstein.	Kevin had not studied in Liechtenstein.	Kevin had studied in Vaduz.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Kevin had studied in either Vaduz or somewhere in Liechtenstein. However, as a matter of fact, Kevin had not studied in Liechtenstein. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Kevin had studied in Vaduz.
RULEBREAKER_0010274_rb	ds	cities	Nina	she	had studied in	Morocco	Rabat	Nina had studied in either Rabat or somewhere in Morocco.	Nina had not studied in Morocco.	Nina had studied in Rabat.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Nina had studied in either Rabat or somewhere in Morocco. However, as a matter of fact, Nina had not studied in Morocco. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Nina had studied in Rabat.
RULEBREAKER_0010275_rb	ds	cities	Snezana	she	had studied in	Suriname	Paramaribo	Snezana had studied in either Paramaribo or somewhere in Suriname.	Snezana had not studied in Suriname.	Snezana had studied in Paramaribo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Snezana had studied in either Paramaribo or somewhere in Suriname. However, as a matter of fact, Snezana had not studied in Suriname. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Snezana had studied in Paramaribo.
RULEBREAKER_0010276_rb	ds	cities	Noah	he	had studied in	Equatorial Guinea	Malabo	Noah had studied in either Malabo or somewhere in Equatorial Guinea.	Noah had not studied in Equatorial Guinea.	Noah had studied in Malabo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Noah had studied in either Malabo or somewhere in Equatorial Guinea. However, as a matter of fact, Noah had not studied in Equatorial Guinea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Noah had studied in Malabo.
RULEBREAKER_0010277_rb	ds	cities	Abdelkader	he	had studied in	Cape Verde	Praia	Abdelkader had studied in either Praia or somewhere in Cape Verde.	Abdelkader had not studied in Cape Verde.	Abdelkader had studied in Praia.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Abdelkader had studied in either Praia or somewhere in Cape Verde. However, as a matter of fact, Abdelkader had not studied in Cape Verde. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Abdelkader had studied in Praia.
RULEBREAKER_0010278_rb	ds	cities	Ren	he	had studied in	Uzbekistan	Tashkent	Ren had studied in either Tashkent or somewhere in Uzbekistan.	Ren had not studied in Uzbekistan.	Ren had studied in Tashkent.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ren had studied in either Tashkent or somewhere in Uzbekistan. However, as a matter of fact, Ren had not studied in Uzbekistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ren had studied in Tashkent.
RULEBREAKER_0010279_rb	ds	cities	Elizabeth	she	had studied in	United Arab Emirates	Abu Dhabi	Elizabeth had studied in either Abu Dhabi or somewhere in United Arab Emirates.	Elizabeth had not studied in United Arab Emirates.	Elizabeth had studied in Abu Dhabi.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Elizabeth had studied in either Abu Dhabi or somewhere in United Arab Emirates. However, as a matter of fact, Elizabeth had not studied in United Arab Emirates. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Elizabeth had studied in Abu Dhabi.
RULEBREAKER_0010280_rb	ds	cities	Kyra	she	had studied in	Niger	Niamey	Kyra had studied in either Niamey or somewhere in Niger.	Kyra had not studied in Niger.	Kyra had studied in Niamey.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Kyra had studied in either Niamey or somewhere in Niger. However, as a matter of fact, Kyra had not studied in Niger. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Kyra had studied in Niamey.
RULEBREAKER_0010281_rb	ds	cities	Elnur	he	had studied in	Turkey	Ankara	Elnur had studied in either Ankara or somewhere in Turkey.	Elnur had not studied in Turkey.	Elnur had studied in Ankara.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Elnur had studied in either Ankara or somewhere in Turkey. However, as a matter of fact, Elnur had not studied in Turkey. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Elnur had studied in Ankara.
RULEBREAKER_0010282_rb	ds	cities	Léo	he	had studied in	Iran	Tehran	Léo had studied in either Tehran or somewhere in Iran.	Léo had not studied in Iran.	Léo had studied in Tehran.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Léo had studied in either Tehran or somewhere in Iran. However, as a matter of fact, Léo had not studied in Iran. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Léo had studied in Tehran.
RULEBREAKER_0010283_rb	ds	cities	Sakura	she	had studied in	Papua New Guinea	Port Moresby	Sakura had studied in either Port Moresby or somewhere in Papua New Guinea.	Sakura had not studied in Papua New Guinea.	Sakura had studied in Port Moresby.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Sakura had studied in either Port Moresby or somewhere in Papua New Guinea. However, as a matter of fact, Sakura had not studied in Papua New Guinea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Sakura had studied in Port Moresby.
RULEBREAKER_0010284_rb	ds	cities	Shaikha	she	had studied in	Paraguay	Asunción	Shaikha had studied in either Asunción or somewhere in Paraguay.	Shaikha had not studied in Paraguay.	Shaikha had studied in Asunción.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Shaikha had studied in either Asunción or somewhere in Paraguay. However, as a matter of fact, Shaikha had not studied in Paraguay. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Shaikha had studied in Asunción.
RULEBREAKER_0010285_rb	ds	cities	Nahia	she	had studied in	The Gambia	Banjul	Nahia had studied in either Banjul or somewhere in The Gambia.	Nahia had not studied in The Gambia.	Nahia had studied in Banjul.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Nahia had studied in either Banjul or somewhere in The Gambia. However, as a matter of fact, Nahia had not studied in The Gambia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Nahia had studied in Banjul.
RULEBREAKER_0010286_rb	ds	cities	Tatiana	she	had studied in	Kyrgyzstan	Bishkek	Tatiana had studied in either Bishkek or somewhere in Kyrgyzstan.	Tatiana had not studied in Kyrgyzstan.	Tatiana had studied in Bishkek.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Tatiana had studied in either Bishkek or somewhere in Kyrgyzstan. However, as a matter of fact, Tatiana had not studied in Kyrgyzstan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Tatiana had studied in Bishkek.
RULEBREAKER_0010287_rb	ds	cities	Leyla	she	had studied in	Lebanon	Beirut	Leyla had studied in either Beirut or somewhere in Lebanon.	Leyla had not studied in Lebanon.	Leyla had studied in Beirut.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Leyla had studied in either Beirut or somewhere in Lebanon. However, as a matter of fact, Leyla had not studied in Lebanon. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Leyla had studied in Beirut.
RULEBREAKER_0010288_rb	ds	cities	Kári	he	had studied in	India	New Delhi	Kári had studied in either New Delhi or somewhere in India.	Kári had not studied in India.	Kári had studied in New Delhi.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Kári had studied in either New Delhi or somewhere in India. However, as a matter of fact, Kári had not studied in India. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Kári had studied in New Delhi.
RULEBREAKER_0010289_rb	ds	cities	Maysoun	she	had studied in	Marshall Islands	Majuro	Maysoun had studied in either Majuro or somewhere in Marshall Islands.	Maysoun had not studied in Marshall Islands.	Maysoun had studied in Majuro.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Maysoun had studied in either Majuro or somewhere in Marshall Islands. However, as a matter of fact, Maysoun had not studied in Marshall Islands. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Maysoun had studied in Majuro.
RULEBREAKER_0010290_rb	ds	cities	Levente	he	had studied in	Honduras	Tegucigalpa	Levente had studied in either Tegucigalpa or somewhere in Honduras.	Levente had not studied in Honduras.	Levente had studied in Tegucigalpa.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Levente had studied in either Tegucigalpa or somewhere in Honduras. However, as a matter of fact, Levente had not studied in Honduras. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Levente had studied in Tegucigalpa.
RULEBREAKER_0010291_rb	ds	cities	Davud	he	had studied in	Germany	Berlin	Davud had studied in either Berlin or somewhere in Germany.	Davud had not studied in Germany.	Davud had studied in Berlin.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Davud had studied in either Berlin or somewhere in Germany. However, as a matter of fact, Davud had not studied in Germany. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Davud had studied in Berlin.
RULEBREAKER_0010292_rb	ds	cities	Sienna	she	had studied in	Croatia	Zagreb	Sienna had studied in either Zagreb or somewhere in Croatia.	Sienna had not studied in Croatia.	Sienna had studied in Zagreb.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Sienna had studied in either Zagreb or somewhere in Croatia. However, as a matter of fact, Sienna had not studied in Croatia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Sienna had studied in Zagreb.
RULEBREAKER_0010293_rb	ds	cities	Sergei	he	had studied in	Saint Lucia	Castries	Sergei had studied in either Castries or somewhere in Saint Lucia.	Sergei had not studied in Saint Lucia.	Sergei had studied in Castries.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Sergei had studied in either Castries or somewhere in Saint Lucia. However, as a matter of fact, Sergei had not studied in Saint Lucia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Sergei had studied in Castries.
RULEBREAKER_0010294_rb	ds	cities	Bandar	he	had studied in	Afghanistan	Kabul	Bandar had studied in either Kabul or somewhere in Afghanistan.	Bandar had not studied in Afghanistan.	Bandar had studied in Kabul.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Bandar had studied in either Kabul or somewhere in Afghanistan. However, as a matter of fact, Bandar had not studied in Afghanistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Bandar had studied in Kabul.
RULEBREAKER_0010295_rb	ds	cities	Amir	he	had studied in	Burundi	Gitega	Amir had studied in either Gitega or somewhere in Burundi.	Amir had not studied in Burundi.	Amir had studied in Gitega.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Amir had studied in either Gitega or somewhere in Burundi. However, as a matter of fact, Amir had not studied in Burundi. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Amir had studied in Gitega.
RULEBREAKER_0010296_rb	ds	cities	Maksym	he	had studied in	Palau	Ngerulmud	Maksym had studied in either Ngerulmud or somewhere in Palau.	Maksym had not studied in Palau.	Maksym had studied in Ngerulmud.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Maksym had studied in either Ngerulmud or somewhere in Palau. However, as a matter of fact, Maksym had not studied in Palau. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Maksym had studied in Ngerulmud.
RULEBREAKER_0010297_rb	ds	cities	Alberte	she	had studied in	Republic of the Congo	Brazzaville	Alberte had studied in either Brazzaville or somewhere in Republic of the Congo.	Alberte had not studied in Republic of the Congo.	Alberte had studied in Brazzaville.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Alberte had studied in either Brazzaville or somewhere in Republic of the Congo. However, as a matter of fact, Alberte had not studied in Republic of the Congo. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Alberte had studied in Brazzaville.
RULEBREAKER_0010298_rb	ds	cities	Jovan	he	had studied in	Belarus	Minsk	Jovan had studied in either Minsk or somewhere in Belarus.	Jovan had not studied in Belarus.	Jovan had studied in Minsk.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Jovan had studied in either Minsk or somewhere in Belarus. However, as a matter of fact, Jovan had not studied in Belarus. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Jovan had studied in Minsk.
RULEBREAKER_0010299_rb	ds	cities	Matthildur	she	had studied in	Latvia	Riga	Matthildur had studied in either Riga or somewhere in Latvia.	Matthildur had not studied in Latvia.	Matthildur had studied in Riga.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Matthildur had studied in either Riga or somewhere in Latvia. However, as a matter of fact, Matthildur had not studied in Latvia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Matthildur had studied in Riga.
RULEBREAKER_0010300_rb	ds	cities	Abdullah	he	had studied in	South Korea	Seoul	Abdullah had studied in either Seoul or somewhere in South Korea.	Abdullah had not studied in South Korea.	Abdullah had studied in Seoul.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Abdullah had studied in either Seoul or somewhere in South Korea. However, as a matter of fact, Abdullah had not studied in South Korea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Abdullah had studied in Seoul.
RULEBREAKER_0010301_rb	ds	cities	Ayra	she	had studied in	Greece	Athens	Ayra had studied in either Athens or somewhere in Greece.	Ayra had not studied in Greece.	Ayra had studied in Athens.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ayra had studied in either Athens or somewhere in Greece. However, as a matter of fact, Ayra had not studied in Greece. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ayra had studied in Athens.
RULEBREAKER_0010302_rb	ds	cities	Ariana	she	had studied in	Uruguay	Montevideo	Ariana had studied in either Montevideo or somewhere in Uruguay.	Ariana had not studied in Uruguay.	Ariana had studied in Montevideo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ariana had studied in either Montevideo or somewhere in Uruguay. However, as a matter of fact, Ariana had not studied in Uruguay. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ariana had studied in Montevideo.
RULEBREAKER_0010303_rb	ds	cities	Lukáš	he	had studied in	Russia	Moscow	Lukáš had studied in either Moscow or somewhere in Russia.	Lukáš had not studied in Russia.	Lukáš had studied in Moscow.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lukáš had studied in either Moscow or somewhere in Russia. However, as a matter of fact, Lukáš had not studied in Russia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lukáš had studied in Moscow.
RULEBREAKER_0010304_rb	ds	cities	Carolina	she	had studied in	Eritrea	Asmara	Carolina had studied in either Asmara or somewhere in Eritrea.	Carolina had not studied in Eritrea.	Carolina had studied in Asmara.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Carolina had studied in either Asmara or somewhere in Eritrea. However, as a matter of fact, Carolina had not studied in Eritrea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Carolina had studied in Asmara.
RULEBREAKER_0010305_rb	ds	cities	Viktoria	she	had studied in	Maldives	Malé	Viktoria had studied in either Malé or somewhere in Maldives.	Viktoria had not studied in Maldives.	Viktoria had studied in Malé.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Viktoria had studied in either Malé or somewhere in Maldives. However, as a matter of fact, Viktoria had not studied in Maldives. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Viktoria had studied in Malé.
RULEBREAKER_0010306_rb	ds	cities	Mùchén	he	had studied in	Ivory Coast	Yamoussoukro	Mùchén had studied in either Yamoussoukro or somewhere in Ivory Coast.	Mùchén had not studied in Ivory Coast.	Mùchén had studied in Yamoussoukro.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Mùchén had studied in either Yamoussoukro or somewhere in Ivory Coast. However, as a matter of fact, Mùchén had not studied in Ivory Coast. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mùchén had studied in Yamoussoukro.
RULEBREAKER_0010307_rb	ds	cities	Antônio	he	had studied in	Estonia	Tallinn	Antônio had studied in either Tallinn or somewhere in Estonia.	Antônio had not studied in Estonia.	Antônio had studied in Tallinn.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Antônio had studied in either Tallinn or somewhere in Estonia. However, as a matter of fact, Antônio had not studied in Estonia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Antônio had studied in Tallinn.
RULEBREAKER_0010308_rb	ds	cities	Ayşa	she	had studied in	Switzerland	Bern	Ayşa had studied in either Bern or somewhere in Switzerland.	Ayşa had not studied in Switzerland.	Ayşa had studied in Bern.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ayşa had studied in either Bern or somewhere in Switzerland. However, as a matter of fact, Ayşa had not studied in Switzerland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ayşa had studied in Bern.
RULEBREAKER_0010309_rb	ds	cities	Alfie	he	had studied in	Kingdom of Denmark	Copenhagen	Alfie had studied in either Copenhagen or somewhere in Kingdom of Denmark.	Alfie had not studied in Kingdom of Denmark.	Alfie had studied in Copenhagen.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Alfie had studied in either Copenhagen or somewhere in Kingdom of Denmark. However, as a matter of fact, Alfie had not studied in Kingdom of Denmark. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Alfie had studied in Copenhagen.

RULEBREAKER_0010210_rb

ds

cities

Alessandro

he

had studied in

Costa Rica

San José

Alessandro had studied in either San José or somewhere in Costa Rica.

Alessandro had not studied in Costa Rica.

Alessandro had studied in San José.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Alessandro had studied in either San José or somewhere in Costa Rica. However, as a matter of fact, Alessandro had not studied in Costa Rica. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Alessandro had studied in San José.

RULEBREAKER_0010211_rb

ds

cities

Elena

she

had studied in

Guatemala

Guatemala City

Elena had studied in either Guatemala City or somewhere in Guatemala.

Elena had not studied in Guatemala.

Elena had studied in Guatemala City.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Elena had studied in either Guatemala City or somewhere in Guatemala. However, as a matter of fact, Elena had not studied in Guatemala. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Elena had studied in Guatemala City.

RULEBREAKER_0010212_rb

ds

cities

Josip

he

had studied in

United Kingdom

London

Josip had studied in either London or somewhere in United Kingdom.

Josip had not studied in United Kingdom.

Josip had studied in London.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Josip had studied in either London or somewhere in United Kingdom. However, as a matter of fact, Josip had not studied in United Kingdom. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Josip had studied in London.

RULEBREAKER_0010213_rb

ds

cities

Helma

she

had studied in

Haiti

Port-au-Prince

Helma had studied in either Port-au-Prince or somewhere in Haiti.

Helma had not studied in Haiti.

Helma had studied in Port-au-Prince.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Helma had studied in either Port-au-Prince or somewhere in Haiti. However, as a matter of fact, Helma had not studied in Haiti. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Helma had studied in Port-au-Prince.

RULEBREAKER_0010214_rb

ds

cities

Elija

she

had studied in

Libya

Tripoli

Elija had studied in either Tripoli or somewhere in Libya.

Elija had not studied in Libya.

Elija had studied in Tripoli.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Elija had studied in either Tripoli or somewhere in Libya. However, as a matter of fact, Elija had not studied in Libya. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Elija had studied in Tripoli.

RULEBREAKER_0010215_rb

ds

cities

Maitê

she

had studied in

Fiji

Suva

Maitê had studied in either Suva or somewhere in Fiji.

Maitê had not studied in Fiji.

Maitê had studied in Suva.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Maitê had studied in either Suva or somewhere in Fiji. However, as a matter of fact, Maitê had not studied in Fiji. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Maitê had studied in Suva.

RULEBREAKER_0010216_rb

ds

cities

Charlie

he

had studied in

Georgia

Tbilisi

Charlie had studied in either Tbilisi or somewhere in Georgia.

Charlie had not studied in Georgia.

Charlie had studied in Tbilisi.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Charlie had studied in either Tbilisi or somewhere in Georgia. However, as a matter of fact, Charlie had not studied in Georgia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Charlie had studied in Tbilisi.

RULEBREAKER_0010217_rb

ds

cities

Ricardo

he

had studied in

Lithuania

Vilnius

Ricardo had studied in either Vilnius or somewhere in Lithuania.

Ricardo had not studied in Lithuania.

Ricardo had studied in Vilnius.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ricardo had studied in either Vilnius or somewhere in Lithuania. However, as a matter of fact, Ricardo had not studied in Lithuania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ricardo had studied in Vilnius.

RULEBREAKER_0010218_rb

ds

cities

Minato

he

had studied in

France

Paris

Minato had studied in either Paris or somewhere in France.

Minato had not studied in France.

Minato had studied in Paris.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Minato had studied in either Paris or somewhere in France. However, as a matter of fact, Minato had not studied in France. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Minato had studied in Paris.

RULEBREAKER_0010219_rb

ds

cities

Sophie

she

had studied in

Iraq

Baghdad

Sophie had studied in either Baghdad or somewhere in Iraq.

Sophie had not studied in Iraq.

Sophie had studied in Baghdad.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Sophie had studied in either Baghdad or somewhere in Iraq. However, as a matter of fact, Sophie had not studied in Iraq. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Sophie had studied in Baghdad.

RULEBREAKER_0010220_rb

ds

cities

Reina

she

had studied in

Dominica

Roseau

Reina had studied in either Roseau or somewhere in Dominica.

Reina had not studied in Dominica.

Reina had studied in Roseau.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Reina had studied in either Roseau or somewhere in Dominica. However, as a matter of fact, Reina had not studied in Dominica. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Reina had studied in Roseau.

RULEBREAKER_0010221_rb

ds

cities

Aria

she

had studied in

Oman

Muscat

Aria had studied in either Muscat or somewhere in Oman.

Aria had not studied in Oman.

Aria had studied in Muscat.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Aria had studied in either Muscat or somewhere in Oman. However, as a matter of fact, Aria had not studied in Oman. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Aria had studied in Muscat.

RULEBREAKER_0010222_rb

ds

cities

Pari

she

had studied in

Thailand

Bangkok

Pari had studied in either Bangkok or somewhere in Thailand.

Pari had not studied in Thailand.

Pari had studied in Bangkok.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Pari had studied in either Bangkok or somewhere in Thailand. However, as a matter of fact, Pari had not studied in Thailand. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Pari had studied in Bangkok.

RULEBREAKER_0010223_rb

ds

cities

Joel

he

had studied in

Slovakia

Bratislava

Joel had studied in either Bratislava or somewhere in Slovakia.

Joel had not studied in Slovakia.

Joel had studied in Bratislava.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Joel had studied in either Bratislava or somewhere in Slovakia. However, as a matter of fact, Joel had not studied in Slovakia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Joel had studied in Bratislava.

RULEBREAKER_0010224_rb

ds

cities

Mareva

she

had studied in

Czech Republic

Prague

Mareva had studied in either Prague or somewhere in Czech Republic.

Mareva had not studied in Czech Republic.

Mareva had studied in Prague.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Mareva had studied in either Prague or somewhere in Czech Republic. However, as a matter of fact, Mareva had not studied in Czech Republic. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mareva had studied in Prague.

RULEBREAKER_0010225_rb

ds

cities

Oumou

she

had studied in

Spain

Madrid

Oumou had studied in either Madrid or somewhere in Spain.

Oumou had not studied in Spain.

Oumou had studied in Madrid.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Oumou had studied in either Madrid or somewhere in Spain. However, as a matter of fact, Oumou had not studied in Spain. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Oumou had studied in Madrid.

RULEBREAKER_0010226_rb

ds

cities

Baran

she

had studied in

Austria

Vienna

Baran had studied in either Vienna or somewhere in Austria.

Baran had not studied in Austria.

Baran had studied in Vienna.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Baran had studied in either Vienna or somewhere in Austria. However, as a matter of fact, Baran had not studied in Austria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Baran had studied in Vienna.

RULEBREAKER_0010227_rb

ds

cities

Fatma

she

had studied in

Indonesia

Jakarta

Fatma had studied in either Jakarta or somewhere in Indonesia.

Fatma had not studied in Indonesia.

Fatma had studied in Jakarta.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Fatma had studied in either Jakarta or somewhere in Indonesia. However, as a matter of fact, Fatma had not studied in Indonesia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Fatma had studied in Jakarta.

RULEBREAKER_0010228_rb

ds

cities

Miguel

he

had studied in

Pakistan

Islamabad

Miguel had studied in either Islamabad or somewhere in Pakistan.

Miguel had not studied in Pakistan.

Miguel had studied in Islamabad.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Miguel had studied in either Islamabad or somewhere in Pakistan. However, as a matter of fact, Miguel had not studied in Pakistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Miguel had studied in Islamabad.

RULEBREAKER_0010229_rb

ds

cities

Lilja

she

had studied in

Brazil

Brasília

Lilja had studied in either Brasília or somewhere in Brazil.

Lilja had not studied in Brazil.

Lilja had studied in Brasília.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lilja had studied in either Brasília or somewhere in Brazil. However, as a matter of fact, Lilja had not studied in Brazil. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lilja had studied in Brasília.

RULEBREAKER_0010230_rb

ds

cities

Katerina

she

had studied in

Belgium

City of Brussels

Katerina had studied in either City of Brussels or somewhere in Belgium.

Katerina had not studied in Belgium.

Katerina had studied in City of Brussels.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Katerina had studied in either City of Brussels or somewhere in Belgium. However, as a matter of fact, Katerina had not studied in Belgium. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Katerina had studied in City of Brussels.

RULEBREAKER_0010231_rb

ds

cities

Valeria

she

had studied in

Tajikistan

Dushanbe

Valeria had studied in either Dushanbe or somewhere in Tajikistan.

Valeria had not studied in Tajikistan.

Valeria had studied in Dushanbe.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Valeria had studied in either Dushanbe or somewhere in Tajikistan. However, as a matter of fact, Valeria had not studied in Tajikistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Valeria had studied in Dushanbe.

RULEBREAKER_0010232_rb

ds

cities

Widelene

she

had studied in

North Macedonia

Skopje

Widelene had studied in either Skopje or somewhere in North Macedonia.

Widelene had not studied in North Macedonia.

Widelene had studied in Skopje.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Widelene had studied in either Skopje or somewhere in North Macedonia. However, as a matter of fact, Widelene had not studied in North Macedonia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Widelene had studied in Skopje.

RULEBREAKER_0010233_rb

ds

cities

Anastasia

she

had studied in

Mozambique

Maputo

Anastasia had studied in either Maputo or somewhere in Mozambique.

Anastasia had not studied in Mozambique.

Anastasia had studied in Maputo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Anastasia had studied in either Maputo or somewhere in Mozambique. However, as a matter of fact, Anastasia had not studied in Mozambique. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Anastasia had studied in Maputo.

RULEBREAKER_0010234_rb

ds

cities

Evens

he

had studied in

Nicaragua

Managua

Evens had studied in either Managua or somewhere in Nicaragua.

Evens had not studied in Nicaragua.

Evens had studied in Managua.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Evens had studied in either Managua or somewhere in Nicaragua. However, as a matter of fact, Evens had not studied in Nicaragua. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Evens had studied in Managua.

RULEBREAKER_0010235_rb

ds

cities

Abubakr

he

had studied in

Cuba

Havana

Abubakr had studied in either Havana or somewhere in Cuba.

Abubakr had not studied in Cuba.

Abubakr had studied in Havana.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Abubakr had studied in either Havana or somewhere in Cuba. However, as a matter of fact, Abubakr had not studied in Cuba. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Abubakr had studied in Havana.

RULEBREAKER_0010236_rb

ds

cities

Jēkabs

he

had studied in

Angola

Luanda

Jēkabs had studied in either Luanda or somewhere in Angola.

Jēkabs had not studied in Angola.

Jēkabs had studied in Luanda.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Jēkabs had studied in either Luanda or somewhere in Angola. However, as a matter of fact, Jēkabs had not studied in Angola. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Jēkabs had studied in Luanda.

RULEBREAKER_0010237_rb

ds

cities

Christina

she

had studied in

Mauritania

Nouakchott

Christina had studied in either Nouakchott or somewhere in Mauritania.

Christina had not studied in Mauritania.

Christina had studied in Nouakchott.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Christina had studied in either Nouakchott or somewhere in Mauritania. However, as a matter of fact, Christina had not studied in Mauritania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Christina had studied in Nouakchott.

RULEBREAKER_0010238_rb

ds

cities

Zoran

he

had studied in

Barbados

Bridgetown

Zoran had studied in either Bridgetown or somewhere in Barbados.

Zoran had not studied in Barbados.

Zoran had studied in Bridgetown.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Zoran had studied in either Bridgetown or somewhere in Barbados. However, as a matter of fact, Zoran had not studied in Barbados. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Zoran had studied in Bridgetown.

RULEBREAKER_0010239_rb

ds

cities

Awa

she

had studied in

Sweden

Stockholm

Awa had studied in either Stockholm or somewhere in Sweden.

Awa had not studied in Sweden.

Awa had studied in Stockholm.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Awa had studied in either Stockholm or somewhere in Sweden. However, as a matter of fact, Awa had not studied in Sweden. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Awa had studied in Stockholm.

RULEBREAKER_0010240_rb

ds

cities

Safija

she

had studied in

Jamaica

Kingston

Safija had studied in either Kingston or somewhere in Jamaica.

Safija had not studied in Jamaica.

Safija had studied in Kingston.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Safija had studied in either Kingston or somewhere in Jamaica. However, as a matter of fact, Safija had not studied in Jamaica. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Safija had studied in Kingston.

RULEBREAKER_0010241_rb

ds

cities

Haruto

he

had studied in

Mongolia

Ulaanbaatar

Haruto had studied in either Ulaanbaatar or somewhere in Mongolia.

Haruto had not studied in Mongolia.

Haruto had studied in Ulaanbaatar.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Haruto had studied in either Ulaanbaatar or somewhere in Mongolia. However, as a matter of fact, Haruto had not studied in Mongolia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Haruto had studied in Ulaanbaatar.

RULEBREAKER_0010242_rb

ds

cities

Miraç

he

had studied in

United States of America

Washington, D.C.

Miraç had studied in either Washington, D.C. or somewhere in United States of America.

Miraç had not studied in United States of America.

Miraç had studied in Washington, D.C..

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Miraç had studied in either Washington, D.C. or somewhere in United States of America. However, as a matter of fact, Miraç had not studied in United States of America. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Miraç had studied in Washington, D.C..

RULEBREAKER_0010243_rb

ds

cities

Martín

he

had studied in

Zimbabwe

Harare

Martín had studied in either Harare or somewhere in Zimbabwe.

Martín had not studied in Zimbabwe.

Martín had studied in Harare.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Martín had studied in either Harare or somewhere in Zimbabwe. However, as a matter of fact, Martín had not studied in Zimbabwe. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Martín had studied in Harare.

RULEBREAKER_0010244_rb

ds

cities

Vicente

he

had studied in

Antigua and Barbuda

Saint John's

Vicente had studied in either Saint John's or somewhere in Antigua and Barbuda.

Vicente had not studied in Antigua and Barbuda.

Vicente had studied in Saint John's.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Vicente had studied in either Saint John's or somewhere in Antigua and Barbuda. However, as a matter of fact, Vicente had not studied in Antigua and Barbuda. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Vicente had studied in Saint John's.

RULEBREAKER_0010245_rb

ds

cities

Dalal

she

had studied in

Madagascar

Antananarivo

Dalal had studied in either Antananarivo or somewhere in Madagascar.

Dalal had not studied in Madagascar.

Dalal had studied in Antananarivo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Dalal had studied in either Antananarivo or somewhere in Madagascar. However, as a matter of fact, Dalal had not studied in Madagascar. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Dalal had studied in Antananarivo.

RULEBREAKER_0010246_rb

ds

cities

Marcell

he

had studied in

Chile

Santiago

Marcell had studied in either Santiago or somewhere in Chile.

Marcell had not studied in Chile.

Marcell had studied in Santiago.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Marcell had studied in either Santiago or somewhere in Chile. However, as a matter of fact, Marcell had not studied in Chile. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Marcell had studied in Santiago.

RULEBREAKER_0010247_rb

ds

cities

Azora Kiara

she

had studied in

Finland

Helsinki

Azora Kiara had studied in either Helsinki or somewhere in Finland.

Azora Kiara had not studied in Finland.

Azora Kiara had studied in Helsinki.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Azora Kiara had studied in either Helsinki or somewhere in Finland. However, as a matter of fact, Azora Kiara had not studied in Finland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Azora Kiara had studied in Helsinki.

RULEBREAKER_0010248_rb

ds

cities

Teiki

he

had studied in

Saudi Arabia

Riyadh

Teiki had studied in either Riyadh or somewhere in Saudi Arabia.

Teiki had not studied in Saudi Arabia.

Teiki had studied in Riyadh.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Teiki had studied in either Riyadh or somewhere in Saudi Arabia. However, as a matter of fact, Teiki had not studied in Saudi Arabia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Teiki had studied in Riyadh.

RULEBREAKER_0010249_rb

ds

cities

Ellen

she

had studied in

Central African Republic

Bangui

Ellen had studied in either Bangui or somewhere in Central African Republic.

Ellen had not studied in Central African Republic.

Ellen had studied in Bangui.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ellen had studied in either Bangui or somewhere in Central African Republic. However, as a matter of fact, Ellen had not studied in Central African Republic. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ellen had studied in Bangui.

RULEBREAKER_0010250_rb

ds

cities

Tadhg

he

had studied in

Ecuador

Quito

Tadhg had studied in either Quito or somewhere in Ecuador.

Tadhg had not studied in Ecuador.

Tadhg had studied in Quito.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Tadhg had studied in either Quito or somewhere in Ecuador. However, as a matter of fact, Tadhg had not studied in Ecuador. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Tadhg had studied in Quito.

RULEBREAKER_0010251_rb

ds

cities

Doha

she

had studied in

Tanzania

Dodoma

Doha had studied in either Dodoma or somewhere in Tanzania.

Doha had not studied in Tanzania.

Doha had studied in Dodoma.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Doha had studied in either Dodoma or somewhere in Tanzania. However, as a matter of fact, Doha had not studied in Tanzania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Doha had studied in Dodoma.

RULEBREAKER_0010252_rb

ds

cities

Esma

she

had studied in

Somalia

Mogadishu

Esma had studied in either Mogadishu or somewhere in Somalia.

Esma had not studied in Somalia.

Esma had studied in Mogadishu.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Esma had studied in either Mogadishu or somewhere in Somalia. However, as a matter of fact, Esma had not studied in Somalia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Esma had studied in Mogadishu.

RULEBREAKER_0010253_rb

ds

cities

Xīnyí

she

had studied in

Malawi

Lilongwe

Xīnyí had studied in either Lilongwe or somewhere in Malawi.

Xīnyí had not studied in Malawi.

Xīnyí had studied in Lilongwe.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Xīnyí had studied in either Lilongwe or somewhere in Malawi. However, as a matter of fact, Xīnyí had not studied in Malawi. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Xīnyí had studied in Lilongwe.

RULEBREAKER_0010254_rb

ds

cities

Jana

she

had studied in

Botswana

Gaborone

Jana had studied in either Gaborone or somewhere in Botswana.

Jana had not studied in Botswana.

Jana had studied in Gaborone.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Jana had studied in either Gaborone or somewhere in Botswana. However, as a matter of fact, Jana had not studied in Botswana. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Jana had studied in Gaborone.

RULEBREAKER_0010255_rb

ds

cities

Barbare

she

had studied in

Belize

Belmopan

Barbare had studied in either Belmopan or somewhere in Belize.

Barbare had not studied in Belize.

Barbare had studied in Belmopan.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Barbare had studied in either Belmopan or somewhere in Belize. However, as a matter of fact, Barbare had not studied in Belize. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Barbare had studied in Belmopan.

RULEBREAKER_0010256_rb

ds

cities

Elyas

he

had studied in

Senegal

Dakar

Elyas had studied in either Dakar or somewhere in Senegal.

Elyas had not studied in Senegal.

Elyas had studied in Dakar.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Elyas had studied in either Dakar or somewhere in Senegal. However, as a matter of fact, Elyas had not studied in Senegal. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Elyas had studied in Dakar.

RULEBREAKER_0010257_rb

ds

cities

Jessica

she

had studied in

Samoa

Apia

Jessica had studied in either Apia or somewhere in Samoa.

Jessica had not studied in Samoa.

Jessica had studied in Apia.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Jessica had studied in either Apia or somewhere in Samoa. However, as a matter of fact, Jessica had not studied in Samoa. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Jessica had studied in Apia.

RULEBREAKER_0010258_rb

ds

cities

Rin

she

had studied in

Kiribati

South Tarawa

Rin had studied in either South Tarawa or somewhere in Kiribati.

Rin had not studied in Kiribati.

Rin had studied in South Tarawa.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Rin had studied in either South Tarawa or somewhere in Kiribati. However, as a matter of fact, Rin had not studied in Kiribati. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Rin had studied in South Tarawa.

RULEBREAKER_0010259_rb

ds

cities

Karine

she

had studied in

Solomon Islands

Honiara

Karine had studied in either Honiara or somewhere in Solomon Islands.

Karine had not studied in Solomon Islands.

Karine had studied in Honiara.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Karine had studied in either Honiara or somewhere in Solomon Islands. However, as a matter of fact, Karine had not studied in Solomon Islands. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Karine had studied in Honiara.

RULEBREAKER_0010260_rb

ds

cities

Clara

she

had studied in

Lesotho

Maseru

Clara had studied in either Maseru or somewhere in Lesotho.

Clara had not studied in Lesotho.

Clara had studied in Maseru.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Clara had studied in either Maseru or somewhere in Lesotho. However, as a matter of fact, Clara had not studied in Lesotho. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Clara had studied in Maseru.

RULEBREAKER_0010261_rb

ds

cities

Delfina

she

had studied in

The Bahamas

Nassau

Delfina had studied in either Nassau or somewhere in The Bahamas.

Delfina had not studied in The Bahamas.

Delfina had studied in Nassau.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Delfina had studied in either Nassau or somewhere in The Bahamas. However, as a matter of fact, Delfina had not studied in The Bahamas. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Delfina had studied in Nassau.

RULEBREAKER_0010262_rb

ds

cities

Chloe

she

had studied in

Tunisia

Tunis

Chloe had studied in either Tunis or somewhere in Tunisia.

Chloe had not studied in Tunisia.

Chloe had studied in Tunis.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Chloe had studied in either Tunis or somewhere in Tunisia. However, as a matter of fact, Chloe had not studied in Tunisia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Chloe had studied in Tunis.

RULEBREAKER_0010263_rb

ds

cities

Azaria

she

had studied in

Nepal

Kathmandu

Azaria had studied in either Kathmandu or somewhere in Nepal.

Azaria had not studied in Nepal.

Azaria had studied in Kathmandu.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Azaria had studied in either Kathmandu or somewhere in Nepal. However, as a matter of fact, Azaria had not studied in Nepal. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Azaria had studied in Kathmandu.

RULEBREAKER_0010264_rb

ds

cities

Niel

he

had studied in

Qatar

Doha

Niel had studied in either Doha or somewhere in Qatar.

Niel had not studied in Qatar.

Niel had studied in Doha.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Niel had studied in either Doha or somewhere in Qatar. However, as a matter of fact, Niel had not studied in Qatar. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Niel had studied in Doha.

RULEBREAKER_0010265_rb

ds

cities

Amayra

she

had studied in

Kazakhstan

Astana

Amayra had studied in either Astana or somewhere in Kazakhstan.

Amayra had not studied in Kazakhstan.

Amayra had studied in Astana.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Amayra had studied in either Astana or somewhere in Kazakhstan. However, as a matter of fact, Amayra had not studied in Kazakhstan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Amayra had studied in Astana.

RULEBREAKER_0010266_rb

ds

cities

Regina

she

had studied in

East Timor

Dili

Regina had studied in either Dili or somewhere in East Timor.

Regina had not studied in East Timor.

Regina had studied in Dili.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Regina had studied in either Dili or somewhere in East Timor. However, as a matter of fact, Regina had not studied in East Timor. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Regina had studied in Dili.

RULEBREAKER_0010267_rb

ds

cities

Damian

he

had studied in

Malaysia

Kuala Lumpur

Damian had studied in either Kuala Lumpur or somewhere in Malaysia.

Damian had not studied in Malaysia.

Damian had studied in Kuala Lumpur.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Damian had studied in either Kuala Lumpur or somewhere in Malaysia. However, as a matter of fact, Damian had not studied in Malaysia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Damian had studied in Kuala Lumpur.

RULEBREAKER_0010268_rb

ds

cities

Gunay

she

had studied in

Tonga

Nukuʻalofa

Gunay had studied in either Nukuʻalofa or somewhere in Tonga.

Gunay had not studied in Tonga.

Gunay had studied in Nukuʻalofa.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Gunay had studied in either Nukuʻalofa or somewhere in Tonga. However, as a matter of fact, Gunay had not studied in Tonga. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Gunay had studied in Nukuʻalofa.

RULEBREAKER_0010269_rb

ds

cities

Sára

she

had studied in

Algeria

Algiers

Sára had studied in either Algiers or somewhere in Algeria.

Sára had not studied in Algeria.

Sára had studied in Algiers.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Sára had studied in either Algiers or somewhere in Algeria. However, as a matter of fact, Sára had not studied in Algeria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Sára had studied in Algiers.

RULEBREAKER_0010270_rb

ds

cities

Daniil

he

had studied in

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Kingstown

Daniil had studied in either Kingstown or somewhere in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.

Daniil had not studied in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.

Daniil had studied in Kingstown.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Daniil had studied in either Kingstown or somewhere in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. However, as a matter of fact, Daniil had not studied in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Daniil had studied in Kingstown.

RULEBREAKER_0010271_rb

ds

cities

Latifa

she

had studied in

Egypt

Cairo

Latifa had studied in either Cairo or somewhere in Egypt.

Latifa had not studied in Egypt.

Latifa had studied in Cairo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Latifa had studied in either Cairo or somewhere in Egypt. However, as a matter of fact, Latifa had not studied in Egypt. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Latifa had studied in Cairo.

RULEBREAKER_0010272_rb

ds

cities

William

he

had studied in

Trinidad and Tobago

Port of Spain

William had studied in either Port of Spain or somewhere in Trinidad and Tobago.

William had not studied in Trinidad and Tobago.

William had studied in Port of Spain.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that William had studied in either Port of Spain or somewhere in Trinidad and Tobago. However, as a matter of fact, William had not studied in Trinidad and Tobago. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

William had studied in Port of Spain.

RULEBREAKER_0010273_rb

ds

cities

Kevin

he

had studied in

Liechtenstein

Vaduz

Kevin had studied in either Vaduz or somewhere in Liechtenstein.

Kevin had not studied in Liechtenstein.

Kevin had studied in Vaduz.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Kevin had studied in either Vaduz or somewhere in Liechtenstein. However, as a matter of fact, Kevin had not studied in Liechtenstein. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Kevin had studied in Vaduz.

RULEBREAKER_0010274_rb

ds

cities

Nina

she

had studied in

Morocco

Rabat

Nina had studied in either Rabat or somewhere in Morocco.

Nina had not studied in Morocco.

Nina had studied in Rabat.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Nina had studied in either Rabat or somewhere in Morocco. However, as a matter of fact, Nina had not studied in Morocco. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Nina had studied in Rabat.

RULEBREAKER_0010275_rb

ds

cities

Snezana

she

had studied in

Suriname

Paramaribo

Snezana had studied in either Paramaribo or somewhere in Suriname.

Snezana had not studied in Suriname.

Snezana had studied in Paramaribo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Snezana had studied in either Paramaribo or somewhere in Suriname. However, as a matter of fact, Snezana had not studied in Suriname. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Snezana had studied in Paramaribo.

RULEBREAKER_0010276_rb

ds

cities

Noah

he

had studied in

Equatorial Guinea

Malabo

Noah had studied in either Malabo or somewhere in Equatorial Guinea.

Noah had not studied in Equatorial Guinea.

Noah had studied in Malabo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Noah had studied in either Malabo or somewhere in Equatorial Guinea. However, as a matter of fact, Noah had not studied in Equatorial Guinea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Noah had studied in Malabo.

RULEBREAKER_0010277_rb

ds

cities

Abdelkader

he

had studied in

Cape Verde

Praia

Abdelkader had studied in either Praia or somewhere in Cape Verde.

Abdelkader had not studied in Cape Verde.

Abdelkader had studied in Praia.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Abdelkader had studied in either Praia or somewhere in Cape Verde. However, as a matter of fact, Abdelkader had not studied in Cape Verde. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Abdelkader had studied in Praia.

RULEBREAKER_0010278_rb

ds

cities

Ren

he

had studied in

Uzbekistan

Tashkent

Ren had studied in either Tashkent or somewhere in Uzbekistan.

Ren had not studied in Uzbekistan.

Ren had studied in Tashkent.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ren had studied in either Tashkent or somewhere in Uzbekistan. However, as a matter of fact, Ren had not studied in Uzbekistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ren had studied in Tashkent.

RULEBREAKER_0010279_rb

ds

cities

Elizabeth

she

had studied in

United Arab Emirates

Abu Dhabi

Elizabeth had studied in either Abu Dhabi or somewhere in United Arab Emirates.

Elizabeth had not studied in United Arab Emirates.

Elizabeth had studied in Abu Dhabi.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Elizabeth had studied in either Abu Dhabi or somewhere in United Arab Emirates. However, as a matter of fact, Elizabeth had not studied in United Arab Emirates. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Elizabeth had studied in Abu Dhabi.

RULEBREAKER_0010280_rb

ds

cities

Kyra

she

had studied in

Niger

Niamey

Kyra had studied in either Niamey or somewhere in Niger.

Kyra had not studied in Niger.

Kyra had studied in Niamey.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Kyra had studied in either Niamey or somewhere in Niger. However, as a matter of fact, Kyra had not studied in Niger. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Kyra had studied in Niamey.

RULEBREAKER_0010281_rb

ds

cities

Elnur

he

had studied in

Turkey

Ankara

Elnur had studied in either Ankara or somewhere in Turkey.

Elnur had not studied in Turkey.

Elnur had studied in Ankara.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Elnur had studied in either Ankara or somewhere in Turkey. However, as a matter of fact, Elnur had not studied in Turkey. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Elnur had studied in Ankara.

RULEBREAKER_0010282_rb

ds

cities

Léo

he

had studied in

Iran

Tehran

Léo had studied in either Tehran or somewhere in Iran.

Léo had not studied in Iran.

Léo had studied in Tehran.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Léo had studied in either Tehran or somewhere in Iran. However, as a matter of fact, Léo had not studied in Iran. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Léo had studied in Tehran.

RULEBREAKER_0010283_rb

ds

cities

Sakura

she

had studied in

Papua New Guinea

Port Moresby

Sakura had studied in either Port Moresby or somewhere in Papua New Guinea.

Sakura had not studied in Papua New Guinea.

Sakura had studied in Port Moresby.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Sakura had studied in either Port Moresby or somewhere in Papua New Guinea. However, as a matter of fact, Sakura had not studied in Papua New Guinea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Sakura had studied in Port Moresby.

RULEBREAKER_0010284_rb

ds

cities

Shaikha

she

had studied in

Paraguay

Asunción

Shaikha had studied in either Asunción or somewhere in Paraguay.

Shaikha had not studied in Paraguay.

Shaikha had studied in Asunción.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Shaikha had studied in either Asunción or somewhere in Paraguay. However, as a matter of fact, Shaikha had not studied in Paraguay. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Shaikha had studied in Asunción.

RULEBREAKER_0010285_rb

ds

cities

Nahia

she

had studied in

The Gambia

Banjul

Nahia had studied in either Banjul or somewhere in The Gambia.

Nahia had not studied in The Gambia.

Nahia had studied in Banjul.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Nahia had studied in either Banjul or somewhere in The Gambia. However, as a matter of fact, Nahia had not studied in The Gambia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Nahia had studied in Banjul.

RULEBREAKER_0010286_rb

ds

cities

Tatiana

she

had studied in

Kyrgyzstan

Bishkek

Tatiana had studied in either Bishkek or somewhere in Kyrgyzstan.

Tatiana had not studied in Kyrgyzstan.

Tatiana had studied in Bishkek.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Tatiana had studied in either Bishkek or somewhere in Kyrgyzstan. However, as a matter of fact, Tatiana had not studied in Kyrgyzstan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Tatiana had studied in Bishkek.

RULEBREAKER_0010287_rb

ds

cities

Leyla

she

had studied in

Lebanon

Beirut

Leyla had studied in either Beirut or somewhere in Lebanon.

Leyla had not studied in Lebanon.

Leyla had studied in Beirut.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Leyla had studied in either Beirut or somewhere in Lebanon. However, as a matter of fact, Leyla had not studied in Lebanon. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Leyla had studied in Beirut.

RULEBREAKER_0010288_rb

ds

cities

Kári

he

had studied in

India

New Delhi

Kári had studied in either New Delhi or somewhere in India.

Kári had not studied in India.

Kári had studied in New Delhi.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Kári had studied in either New Delhi or somewhere in India. However, as a matter of fact, Kári had not studied in India. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Kári had studied in New Delhi.

RULEBREAKER_0010289_rb

ds

cities

Maysoun

she

had studied in

Marshall Islands

Majuro

Maysoun had studied in either Majuro or somewhere in Marshall Islands.

Maysoun had not studied in Marshall Islands.

Maysoun had studied in Majuro.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Maysoun had studied in either Majuro or somewhere in Marshall Islands. However, as a matter of fact, Maysoun had not studied in Marshall Islands. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Maysoun had studied in Majuro.

RULEBREAKER_0010290_rb

ds

cities

Levente

he

had studied in

Honduras

Tegucigalpa

Levente had studied in either Tegucigalpa or somewhere in Honduras.

Levente had not studied in Honduras.

Levente had studied in Tegucigalpa.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Levente had studied in either Tegucigalpa or somewhere in Honduras. However, as a matter of fact, Levente had not studied in Honduras. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Levente had studied in Tegucigalpa.

RULEBREAKER_0010291_rb

ds

cities

Davud

he

had studied in

Germany

Berlin

Davud had studied in either Berlin or somewhere in Germany.

Davud had not studied in Germany.

Davud had studied in Berlin.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Davud had studied in either Berlin or somewhere in Germany. However, as a matter of fact, Davud had not studied in Germany. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Davud had studied in Berlin.

RULEBREAKER_0010292_rb

ds

cities

Sienna

she

had studied in

Croatia

Zagreb

Sienna had studied in either Zagreb or somewhere in Croatia.

Sienna had not studied in Croatia.

Sienna had studied in Zagreb.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Sienna had studied in either Zagreb or somewhere in Croatia. However, as a matter of fact, Sienna had not studied in Croatia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Sienna had studied in Zagreb.

RULEBREAKER_0010293_rb

ds

cities

Sergei

he

had studied in

Saint Lucia

Castries

Sergei had studied in either Castries or somewhere in Saint Lucia.

Sergei had not studied in Saint Lucia.

Sergei had studied in Castries.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Sergei had studied in either Castries or somewhere in Saint Lucia. However, as a matter of fact, Sergei had not studied in Saint Lucia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Sergei had studied in Castries.

RULEBREAKER_0010294_rb

ds

cities

Bandar

he

had studied in

Afghanistan

Kabul

Bandar had studied in either Kabul or somewhere in Afghanistan.

Bandar had not studied in Afghanistan.

Bandar had studied in Kabul.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Bandar had studied in either Kabul or somewhere in Afghanistan. However, as a matter of fact, Bandar had not studied in Afghanistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Bandar had studied in Kabul.

RULEBREAKER_0010295_rb

ds

cities

Amir

he

had studied in

Burundi

Gitega

Amir had studied in either Gitega or somewhere in Burundi.

Amir had not studied in Burundi.

Amir had studied in Gitega.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Amir had studied in either Gitega or somewhere in Burundi. However, as a matter of fact, Amir had not studied in Burundi. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Amir had studied in Gitega.

RULEBREAKER_0010296_rb

ds

cities

Maksym

he

had studied in

Palau

Ngerulmud

Maksym had studied in either Ngerulmud or somewhere in Palau.

Maksym had not studied in Palau.

Maksym had studied in Ngerulmud.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Maksym had studied in either Ngerulmud or somewhere in Palau. However, as a matter of fact, Maksym had not studied in Palau. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Maksym had studied in Ngerulmud.

RULEBREAKER_0010297_rb

ds

cities

Alberte

she

had studied in

Republic of the Congo

Brazzaville

Alberte had studied in either Brazzaville or somewhere in Republic of the Congo.

Alberte had not studied in Republic of the Congo.

Alberte had studied in Brazzaville.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Alberte had studied in either Brazzaville or somewhere in Republic of the Congo. However, as a matter of fact, Alberte had not studied in Republic of the Congo. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Alberte had studied in Brazzaville.

RULEBREAKER_0010298_rb

ds

cities

Jovan

he

had studied in

Belarus

Minsk

Jovan had studied in either Minsk or somewhere in Belarus.

Jovan had not studied in Belarus.

Jovan had studied in Minsk.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Jovan had studied in either Minsk or somewhere in Belarus. However, as a matter of fact, Jovan had not studied in Belarus. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Jovan had studied in Minsk.

RULEBREAKER_0010299_rb

ds

cities

Matthildur

she

had studied in

Latvia

Riga

Matthildur had studied in either Riga or somewhere in Latvia.

Matthildur had not studied in Latvia.

Matthildur had studied in Riga.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Matthildur had studied in either Riga or somewhere in Latvia. However, as a matter of fact, Matthildur had not studied in Latvia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Matthildur had studied in Riga.

RULEBREAKER_0010300_rb

ds

cities

Abdullah

he

had studied in

South Korea

Seoul

Abdullah had studied in either Seoul or somewhere in South Korea.

Abdullah had not studied in South Korea.

Abdullah had studied in Seoul.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Abdullah had studied in either Seoul or somewhere in South Korea. However, as a matter of fact, Abdullah had not studied in South Korea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Abdullah had studied in Seoul.

RULEBREAKER_0010301_rb

ds

cities

Ayra

she

had studied in

Greece

Athens

Ayra had studied in either Athens or somewhere in Greece.

Ayra had not studied in Greece.

Ayra had studied in Athens.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ayra had studied in either Athens or somewhere in Greece. However, as a matter of fact, Ayra had not studied in Greece. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ayra had studied in Athens.

RULEBREAKER_0010302_rb

ds

cities

Ariana

she

had studied in

Uruguay

Montevideo

Ariana had studied in either Montevideo or somewhere in Uruguay.

Ariana had not studied in Uruguay.

Ariana had studied in Montevideo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ariana had studied in either Montevideo or somewhere in Uruguay. However, as a matter of fact, Ariana had not studied in Uruguay. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ariana had studied in Montevideo.

RULEBREAKER_0010303_rb

ds

cities

Lukáš

he

had studied in

Russia

Moscow

Lukáš had studied in either Moscow or somewhere in Russia.

Lukáš had not studied in Russia.

Lukáš had studied in Moscow.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lukáš had studied in either Moscow or somewhere in Russia. However, as a matter of fact, Lukáš had not studied in Russia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lukáš had studied in Moscow.

RULEBREAKER_0010304_rb

ds

cities

Carolina

she

had studied in

Eritrea

Asmara

Carolina had studied in either Asmara or somewhere in Eritrea.

Carolina had not studied in Eritrea.

Carolina had studied in Asmara.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Carolina had studied in either Asmara or somewhere in Eritrea. However, as a matter of fact, Carolina had not studied in Eritrea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Carolina had studied in Asmara.

RULEBREAKER_0010305_rb

ds

cities

Viktoria

she

had studied in

Maldives

Malé

Viktoria had studied in either Malé or somewhere in Maldives.

Viktoria had not studied in Maldives.

Viktoria had studied in Malé.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Viktoria had studied in either Malé or somewhere in Maldives. However, as a matter of fact, Viktoria had not studied in Maldives. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Viktoria had studied in Malé.

RULEBREAKER_0010306_rb

ds

cities

Mùchén

he

had studied in

Ivory Coast

Yamoussoukro

Mùchén had studied in either Yamoussoukro or somewhere in Ivory Coast.

Mùchén had not studied in Ivory Coast.

Mùchén had studied in Yamoussoukro.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Mùchén had studied in either Yamoussoukro or somewhere in Ivory Coast. However, as a matter of fact, Mùchén had not studied in Ivory Coast. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mùchén had studied in Yamoussoukro.

RULEBREAKER_0010307_rb

ds

cities

Antônio

he

had studied in

Estonia

Tallinn

Antônio had studied in either Tallinn or somewhere in Estonia.

Antônio had not studied in Estonia.

Antônio had studied in Tallinn.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Antônio had studied in either Tallinn or somewhere in Estonia. However, as a matter of fact, Antônio had not studied in Estonia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Antônio had studied in Tallinn.

RULEBREAKER_0010308_rb

ds

cities

Ayşa

she

had studied in

Switzerland

Bern

Ayşa had studied in either Bern or somewhere in Switzerland.

Ayşa had not studied in Switzerland.

Ayşa had studied in Bern.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ayşa had studied in either Bern or somewhere in Switzerland. However, as a matter of fact, Ayşa had not studied in Switzerland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ayşa had studied in Bern.

RULEBREAKER_0010309_rb

ds

cities

Alfie

he

had studied in

Kingdom of Denmark

Copenhagen

Alfie had studied in either Copenhagen or somewhere in Kingdom of Denmark.

Alfie had not studied in Kingdom of Denmark.

Alfie had studied in Copenhagen.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Alfie had studied in either Copenhagen or somewhere in Kingdom of Denmark. However, as a matter of fact, Alfie had not studied in Kingdom of Denmark. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Alfie had studied in Copenhagen.