jason-c/rulebreakers · Datasets at Hugging Face

id stringlengths 22 25	rulebreaker_type stringclasses 2 values	category stringclasses 9 values	firstName stringlengths 2 16	pronoun stringclasses 2 values	verb stringclasses 12 values	entityA stringclasses 191 values	entityB stringclasses 307 values	premise1 stringlengths 42 102	premise2 stringlengths 14 63	conclusion stringlengths 14 63	label bool 2 classes	kc_gen_formatted_prompt stringlengths 278 375	target_correct_conclusion stringlengths 14 62	target_incorrect_conclusion stringlengths 14 63
RULEBREAKER_0010110_rb	ds	cities	Aariz	he	had studied in	Saint Lucia	Castries	Aariz had studied in either Castries or somewhere in Saint Lucia.	Aariz had not studied in Saint Lucia.	Aariz had studied in Castries.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Aariz had studied in either Castries or somewhere in Saint Lucia. However, as a matter of fact, Aariz had not studied in Saint Lucia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Aariz had studied in Castries.
RULEBREAKER_0010111_rb	ds	cities	Emmanuel	he	had studied in	Afghanistan	Kabul	Emmanuel had studied in either Kabul or somewhere in Afghanistan.	Emmanuel had not studied in Afghanistan.	Emmanuel had studied in Kabul.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Emmanuel had studied in either Kabul or somewhere in Afghanistan. However, as a matter of fact, Emmanuel had not studied in Afghanistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Emmanuel had studied in Kabul.
RULEBREAKER_0010112_rb	ds	cities	Mariana	she	had studied in	Burundi	Gitega	Mariana had studied in either Gitega or somewhere in Burundi.	Mariana had not studied in Burundi.	Mariana had studied in Gitega.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Mariana had studied in either Gitega or somewhere in Burundi. However, as a matter of fact, Mariana had not studied in Burundi. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mariana had studied in Gitega.
RULEBREAKER_0010113_rb	ds	cities	Lethokuhle	she	had studied in	Palau	Ngerulmud	Lethokuhle had studied in either Ngerulmud or somewhere in Palau.	Lethokuhle had not studied in Palau.	Lethokuhle had studied in Ngerulmud.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lethokuhle had studied in either Ngerulmud or somewhere in Palau. However, as a matter of fact, Lethokuhle had not studied in Palau. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lethokuhle had studied in Ngerulmud.
RULEBREAKER_0010114_rb	ds	cities	Lorenzo	he	had studied in	Republic of the Congo	Brazzaville	Lorenzo had studied in either Brazzaville or somewhere in Republic of the Congo.	Lorenzo had not studied in Republic of the Congo.	Lorenzo had studied in Brazzaville.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lorenzo had studied in either Brazzaville or somewhere in Republic of the Congo. However, as a matter of fact, Lorenzo had not studied in Republic of the Congo. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lorenzo had studied in Brazzaville.
RULEBREAKER_0010115_rb	ds	cities	Maligiaq	he	had studied in	Belarus	Minsk	Maligiaq had studied in either Minsk or somewhere in Belarus.	Maligiaq had not studied in Belarus.	Maligiaq had studied in Minsk.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Maligiaq had studied in either Minsk or somewhere in Belarus. However, as a matter of fact, Maligiaq had not studied in Belarus. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Maligiaq had studied in Minsk.
RULEBREAKER_0010116_rb	ds	cities	Aasha	she	had studied in	Latvia	Riga	Aasha had studied in either Riga or somewhere in Latvia.	Aasha had not studied in Latvia.	Aasha had studied in Riga.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Aasha had studied in either Riga or somewhere in Latvia. However, as a matter of fact, Aasha had not studied in Latvia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Aasha had studied in Riga.
RULEBREAKER_0010117_rb	ds	cities	Samvel	he	had studied in	South Korea	Seoul	Samvel had studied in either Seoul or somewhere in South Korea.	Samvel had not studied in South Korea.	Samvel had studied in Seoul.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Samvel had studied in either Seoul or somewhere in South Korea. However, as a matter of fact, Samvel had not studied in South Korea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Samvel had studied in Seoul.
RULEBREAKER_0010118_rb	ds	cities	Dejan	he	had studied in	Greece	Athens	Dejan had studied in either Athens or somewhere in Greece.	Dejan had not studied in Greece.	Dejan had studied in Athens.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Dejan had studied in either Athens or somewhere in Greece. However, as a matter of fact, Dejan had not studied in Greece. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Dejan had studied in Athens.
RULEBREAKER_0010119_rb	ds	cities	Adéla	she	had studied in	Uruguay	Montevideo	Adéla had studied in either Montevideo or somewhere in Uruguay.	Adéla had not studied in Uruguay.	Adéla had studied in Montevideo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Adéla had studied in either Montevideo or somewhere in Uruguay. However, as a matter of fact, Adéla had not studied in Uruguay. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Adéla had studied in Montevideo.
RULEBREAKER_0010120_rb	ds	cities	June	she	had studied in	Russia	Moscow	June had studied in either Moscow or somewhere in Russia.	June had not studied in Russia.	June had studied in Moscow.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that June had studied in either Moscow or somewhere in Russia. However, as a matter of fact, June had not studied in Russia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	June had studied in Moscow.
RULEBREAKER_0010121_rb	ds	cities	Lilly	she	had studied in	Eritrea	Asmara	Lilly had studied in either Asmara or somewhere in Eritrea.	Lilly had not studied in Eritrea.	Lilly had studied in Asmara.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lilly had studied in either Asmara or somewhere in Eritrea. However, as a matter of fact, Lilly had not studied in Eritrea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lilly had studied in Asmara.
RULEBREAKER_0010122_rb	ds	cities	Eleni	she	had studied in	Maldives	Malé	Eleni had studied in either Malé or somewhere in Maldives.	Eleni had not studied in Maldives.	Eleni had studied in Malé.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Eleni had studied in either Malé or somewhere in Maldives. However, as a matter of fact, Eleni had not studied in Maldives. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Eleni had studied in Malé.
RULEBREAKER_0010123_rb	ds	cities	Arman	he	had studied in	Ivory Coast	Yamoussoukro	Arman had studied in either Yamoussoukro or somewhere in Ivory Coast.	Arman had not studied in Ivory Coast.	Arman had studied in Yamoussoukro.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Arman had studied in either Yamoussoukro or somewhere in Ivory Coast. However, as a matter of fact, Arman had not studied in Ivory Coast. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Arman had studied in Yamoussoukro.
RULEBREAKER_0010124_rb	ds	cities	Goran	he	had studied in	Estonia	Tallinn	Goran had studied in either Tallinn or somewhere in Estonia.	Goran had not studied in Estonia.	Goran had studied in Tallinn.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Goran had studied in either Tallinn or somewhere in Estonia. However, as a matter of fact, Goran had not studied in Estonia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Goran had studied in Tallinn.
RULEBREAKER_0010125_rb	ds	cities	Suha	she	had studied in	Switzerland	Bern	Suha had studied in either Bern or somewhere in Switzerland.	Suha had not studied in Switzerland.	Suha had studied in Bern.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Suha had studied in either Bern or somewhere in Switzerland. However, as a matter of fact, Suha had not studied in Switzerland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Suha had studied in Bern.
RULEBREAKER_0010126_rb	ds	cities	Nurislam	he	had studied in	Kingdom of Denmark	Copenhagen	Nurislam had studied in either Copenhagen or somewhere in Kingdom of Denmark.	Nurislam had not studied in Kingdom of Denmark.	Nurislam had studied in Copenhagen.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Nurislam had studied in either Copenhagen or somewhere in Kingdom of Denmark. However, as a matter of fact, Nurislam had not studied in Kingdom of Denmark. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Nurislam had studied in Copenhagen.
RULEBREAKER_0010127_rb	ds	cities	Sobia	she	had studied in	Romania	Bucharest	Sobia had studied in either Bucharest or somewhere in Romania.	Sobia had not studied in Romania.	Sobia had studied in Bucharest.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Sobia had studied in either Bucharest or somewhere in Romania. However, as a matter of fact, Sobia had not studied in Romania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Sobia had studied in Bucharest.
RULEBREAKER_0010128_rb	ds	cities	Ambre	she	had studied in	Azerbaijan	Baku	Ambre had studied in either Baku or somewhere in Azerbaijan.	Ambre had not studied in Azerbaijan.	Ambre had studied in Baku.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ambre had studied in either Baku or somewhere in Azerbaijan. However, as a matter of fact, Ambre had not studied in Azerbaijan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ambre had studied in Baku.
RULEBREAKER_0010129_rb	ds	cities	Matei	he	had studied in	Bulgaria	Sofia	Matei had studied in either Sofia or somewhere in Bulgaria.	Matei had not studied in Bulgaria.	Matei had studied in Sofia.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Matei had studied in either Sofia or somewhere in Bulgaria. However, as a matter of fact, Matei had not studied in Bulgaria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Matei had studied in Sofia.
RULEBREAKER_0010130_rb	ds	cities	Alise	she	had studied in	Norway	Oslo	Alise had studied in either Oslo or somewhere in Norway.	Alise had not studied in Norway.	Alise had studied in Oslo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Alise had studied in either Oslo or somewhere in Norway. However, as a matter of fact, Alise had not studied in Norway. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Alise had studied in Oslo.
RULEBREAKER_0010131_rb	ds	cities	Raquel	she	had studied in	Bhutan	Thimphu	Raquel had studied in either Thimphu or somewhere in Bhutan.	Raquel had not studied in Bhutan.	Raquel had studied in Thimphu.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Raquel had studied in either Thimphu or somewhere in Bhutan. However, as a matter of fact, Raquel had not studied in Bhutan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Raquel had studied in Thimphu.
RULEBREAKER_0010132_rb	ds	cities	Logan	he	had studied in	Saint Kitts and Nevis	Basseterre	Logan had studied in either Basseterre or somewhere in Saint Kitts and Nevis.	Logan had not studied in Saint Kitts and Nevis.	Logan had studied in Basseterre.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Logan had studied in either Basseterre or somewhere in Saint Kitts and Nevis. However, as a matter of fact, Logan had not studied in Saint Kitts and Nevis. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Logan had studied in Basseterre.
RULEBREAKER_0010133_rb	ds	cities	Lourenço	he	had studied in	Philippines	Manila	Lourenço had studied in either Manila or somewhere in Philippines.	Lourenço had not studied in Philippines.	Lourenço had studied in Manila.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lourenço had studied in either Manila or somewhere in Philippines. However, as a matter of fact, Lourenço had not studied in Philippines. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lourenço had studied in Manila.
RULEBREAKER_0010134_rb	ds	cities	Mikołaj	he	had studied in	Ireland	Dublin	Mikołaj had studied in either Dublin or somewhere in Ireland.	Mikołaj had not studied in Ireland.	Mikołaj had studied in Dublin.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Mikołaj had studied in either Dublin or somewhere in Ireland. However, as a matter of fact, Mikołaj had not studied in Ireland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mikołaj had studied in Dublin.
RULEBREAKER_0010135_rb	ds	cities	Tatsuki	he	had studied in	Dominican Republic	Santo Domingo	Tatsuki had studied in either Santo Domingo or somewhere in Dominican Republic.	Tatsuki had not studied in Dominican Republic.	Tatsuki had studied in Santo Domingo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Tatsuki had studied in either Santo Domingo or somewhere in Dominican Republic. However, as a matter of fact, Tatsuki had not studied in Dominican Republic. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Tatsuki had studied in Santo Domingo.
RULEBREAKER_0010136_rb	ds	cities	Hasan	he	had studied in	Australia	Canberra	Hasan had studied in either Canberra or somewhere in Australia.	Hasan had not studied in Australia.	Hasan had studied in Canberra.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Hasan had studied in either Canberra or somewhere in Australia. However, as a matter of fact, Hasan had not studied in Australia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Hasan had studied in Canberra.
RULEBREAKER_0010137_rb	ds	cities	Jacob	he	had studied in	Federated States of Micronesia	Palikir	Jacob had studied in either Palikir or somewhere in Federated States of Micronesia.	Jacob had not studied in Federated States of Micronesia.	Jacob had studied in Palikir.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Jacob had studied in either Palikir or somewhere in Federated States of Micronesia. However, as a matter of fact, Jacob had not studied in Federated States of Micronesia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Jacob had studied in Palikir.
RULEBREAKER_0010138_rb	ds	cities	Mehdi	he	had studied in	Japan	Tokyo	Mehdi had studied in either Tokyo or somewhere in Japan.	Mehdi had not studied in Japan.	Mehdi had studied in Tokyo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Mehdi had studied in either Tokyo or somewhere in Japan. However, as a matter of fact, Mehdi had not studied in Japan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mehdi had studied in Tokyo.
RULEBREAKER_0010139_rb	ds	cities	Yulia	she	had studied in	Myanmar	Naypyidaw	Yulia had studied in either Naypyidaw or somewhere in Myanmar.	Yulia had not studied in Myanmar.	Yulia had studied in Naypyidaw.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Yulia had studied in either Naypyidaw or somewhere in Myanmar. However, as a matter of fact, Yulia had not studied in Myanmar. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Yulia had studied in Naypyidaw.
RULEBREAKER_0010140_rb	ds	cities	Lena	she	had studied in	Portugal	Lisbon	Lena had studied in either Lisbon or somewhere in Portugal.	Lena had not studied in Portugal.	Lena had studied in Lisbon.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lena had studied in either Lisbon or somewhere in Portugal. However, as a matter of fact, Lena had not studied in Portugal. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lena had studied in Lisbon.
RULEBREAKER_0010141_rb	ds	cities	Juana	she	had studied in	Ukraine	Kyiv	Juana had studied in either Kyiv or somewhere in Ukraine.	Juana had not studied in Ukraine.	Juana had studied in Kyiv.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Juana had studied in either Kyiv or somewhere in Ukraine. However, as a matter of fact, Juana had not studied in Ukraine. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Juana had studied in Kyiv.
RULEBREAKER_0010142_rb	ds	cities	Maryam	she	had studied in	Rwanda	Kigali	Maryam had studied in either Kigali or somewhere in Rwanda.	Maryam had not studied in Rwanda.	Maryam had studied in Kigali.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Maryam had studied in either Kigali or somewhere in Rwanda. However, as a matter of fact, Maryam had not studied in Rwanda. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Maryam had studied in Kigali.
RULEBREAKER_0010143_rb	ds	cities	Cillian	he	had studied in	Grenada	St. George's	Cillian had studied in either St. George's or somewhere in Grenada.	Cillian had not studied in Grenada.	Cillian had studied in St. George's.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Cillian had studied in either St. George's or somewhere in Grenada. However, as a matter of fact, Cillian had not studied in Grenada. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Cillian had studied in St. George's.
RULEBREAKER_0010144_rb	ds	cities	Tiago	he	had studied in	Cameroon	Yaoundé	Tiago had studied in either Yaoundé or somewhere in Cameroon.	Tiago had not studied in Cameroon.	Tiago had studied in Yaoundé.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Tiago had studied in either Yaoundé or somewhere in Cameroon. However, as a matter of fact, Tiago had not studied in Cameroon. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Tiago had studied in Yaoundé.
RULEBREAKER_0010145_rb	ds	cities	Míngzé	he	had studied in	Zambia	Lusaka	Míngzé had studied in either Lusaka or somewhere in Zambia.	Míngzé had not studied in Zambia.	Míngzé had studied in Lusaka.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Míngzé had studied in either Lusaka or somewhere in Zambia. However, as a matter of fact, Míngzé had not studied in Zambia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Míngzé had studied in Lusaka.
RULEBREAKER_0010146_rb	ds	cities	Julie	she	had studied in	Tuvalu	Funafuti	Julie had studied in either Funafuti or somewhere in Tuvalu.	Julie had not studied in Tuvalu.	Julie had studied in Funafuti.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Julie had studied in either Funafuti or somewhere in Tuvalu. However, as a matter of fact, Julie had not studied in Tuvalu. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Julie had studied in Funafuti.
RULEBREAKER_0010147_rb	ds	cities	Hina	she	had studied in	Sudan	Khartoum	Hina had studied in either Khartoum or somewhere in Sudan.	Hina had not studied in Sudan.	Hina had studied in Khartoum.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Hina had studied in either Khartoum or somewhere in Sudan. However, as a matter of fact, Hina had not studied in Sudan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Hina had studied in Khartoum.
RULEBREAKER_0010148_rb	ds	cities	Ariel	he	had studied in	South Sudan	Juba	Ariel had studied in either Juba or somewhere in South Sudan.	Ariel had not studied in South Sudan.	Ariel had studied in Juba.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ariel had studied in either Juba or somewhere in South Sudan. However, as a matter of fact, Ariel had not studied in South Sudan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ariel had studied in Juba.
RULEBREAKER_0010149_rb	ds	cities	Margaret	she	had studied in	Ethiopia	Addis Ababa	Margaret had studied in either Addis Ababa or somewhere in Ethiopia.	Margaret had not studied in Ethiopia.	Margaret had studied in Addis Ababa.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Margaret had studied in either Addis Ababa or somewhere in Ethiopia. However, as a matter of fact, Margaret had not studied in Ethiopia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Margaret had studied in Addis Ababa.
RULEBREAKER_0010150_rb	ds	cities	Luknė	she	had studied in	Iceland	Reykjavík	Luknė had studied in either Reykjavík or somewhere in Iceland.	Luknė had not studied in Iceland.	Luknė had studied in Reykjavík.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Luknė had studied in either Reykjavík or somewhere in Iceland. However, as a matter of fact, Luknė had not studied in Iceland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Luknė had studied in Reykjavík.
RULEBREAKER_0010151_rb	ds	cities	Abdoulaye	he	had studied in	Moldova	Chișinău	Abdoulaye had studied in either Chișinău or somewhere in Moldova.	Abdoulaye had not studied in Moldova.	Abdoulaye had studied in Chișinău.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Abdoulaye had studied in either Chișinău or somewhere in Moldova. However, as a matter of fact, Abdoulaye had not studied in Moldova. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Abdoulaye had studied in Chișinău.
RULEBREAKER_0010152_rb	ds	cities	Malachi	he	had studied in	São Tomé and Príncipe	São Tomé	Malachi had studied in either São Tomé or somewhere in São Tomé and Príncipe.	Malachi had not studied in São Tomé and Príncipe.	Malachi had studied in São Tomé.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Malachi had studied in either São Tomé or somewhere in São Tomé and Príncipe. However, as a matter of fact, Malachi had not studied in São Tomé and Príncipe. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Malachi had studied in São Tomé.
RULEBREAKER_0010153_rb	ds	cities	Mohammed	he	had studied in	Cyprus	Nicosia	Mohammed had studied in either Nicosia or somewhere in Cyprus.	Mohammed had not studied in Cyprus.	Mohammed had studied in Nicosia.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Mohammed had studied in either Nicosia or somewhere in Cyprus. However, as a matter of fact, Mohammed had not studied in Cyprus. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mohammed had studied in Nicosia.
RULEBREAKER_0010154_rb	ds	cities	Carl	he	had studied in	Guyana	Georgetown	Carl had studied in either Georgetown or somewhere in Guyana.	Carl had not studied in Guyana.	Carl had studied in Georgetown.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Carl had studied in either Georgetown or somewhere in Guyana. However, as a matter of fact, Carl had not studied in Guyana. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Carl had studied in Georgetown.
RULEBREAKER_0010155_rb	ds	cities	Ju-won	he	had studied in	Jordan	Amman	Ju-won had studied in either Amman or somewhere in Jordan.	Ju-won had not studied in Jordan.	Ju-won had studied in Amman.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ju-won had studied in either Amman or somewhere in Jordan. However, as a matter of fact, Ju-won had not studied in Jordan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ju-won had studied in Amman.
RULEBREAKER_0010156_rb	ds	cities	Yoana	she	had studied in	Andorra	Andorra la Vella	Yoana had studied in either Andorra la Vella or somewhere in Andorra.	Yoana had not studied in Andorra.	Yoana had studied in Andorra la Vella.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Yoana had studied in either Andorra la Vella or somewhere in Andorra. However, as a matter of fact, Yoana had not studied in Andorra. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Yoana had studied in Andorra la Vella.
RULEBREAKER_0010157_rb	ds	cities	Merjem	she	had studied in	Serbia	Belgrade	Merjem had studied in either Belgrade or somewhere in Serbia.	Merjem had not studied in Serbia.	Merjem had studied in Belgrade.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Merjem had studied in either Belgrade or somewhere in Serbia. However, as a matter of fact, Merjem had not studied in Serbia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Merjem had studied in Belgrade.
RULEBREAKER_0010158_rb	ds	cities	Artyom	he	had studied in	Bosnia and Herzegovina	Sarajevo	Artyom had studied in either Sarajevo or somewhere in Bosnia and Herzegovina.	Artyom had not studied in Bosnia and Herzegovina.	Artyom had studied in Sarajevo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Artyom had studied in either Sarajevo or somewhere in Bosnia and Herzegovina. However, as a matter of fact, Artyom had not studied in Bosnia and Herzegovina. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Artyom had studied in Sarajevo.
RULEBREAKER_0010159_rb	ds	cities	Aysel	she	had studied in	Kingdom of the Netherlands	Amsterdam	Aysel had studied in either Amsterdam or somewhere in Kingdom of the Netherlands.	Aysel had not studied in Kingdom of the Netherlands.	Aysel had studied in Amsterdam.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Aysel had studied in either Amsterdam or somewhere in Kingdom of the Netherlands. However, as a matter of fact, Aysel had not studied in Kingdom of the Netherlands. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Aysel had studied in Amsterdam.
RULEBREAKER_0010160_rb	ds	cities	Zina	she	had studied in	Sierra Leone	Freetown	Zina had studied in either Freetown or somewhere in Sierra Leone.	Zina had not studied in Sierra Leone.	Zina had studied in Freetown.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Zina had studied in either Freetown or somewhere in Sierra Leone. However, as a matter of fact, Zina had not studied in Sierra Leone. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Zina had studied in Freetown.
RULEBREAKER_0010161_rb	ds	cities	Ahmet	he	had studied in	Colombia	Bogotá	Ahmet had studied in either Bogotá or somewhere in Colombia.	Ahmet had not studied in Colombia.	Ahmet had studied in Bogotá.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ahmet had studied in either Bogotá or somewhere in Colombia. However, as a matter of fact, Ahmet had not studied in Colombia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ahmet had studied in Bogotá.
RULEBREAKER_0010162_rb	ds	cities	Sunita	she	had studied in	Nauru	Yaren District	Sunita had studied in either Yaren District or somewhere in Nauru.	Sunita had not studied in Nauru.	Sunita had studied in Yaren District.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Sunita had studied in either Yaren District or somewhere in Nauru. However, as a matter of fact, Sunita had not studied in Nauru. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Sunita had studied in Yaren District.
RULEBREAKER_0010163_rb	ds	cities	George	he	had studied in	Canada	Ottawa	George had studied in either Ottawa or somewhere in Canada.	George had not studied in Canada.	George had studied in Ottawa.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that George had studied in either Ottawa or somewhere in Canada. However, as a matter of fact, George had not studied in Canada. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	George had studied in Ottawa.
RULEBREAKER_0010164_rb	ds	cities	Zahra	she	had studied in	Namibia	Windhoek	Zahra had studied in either Windhoek or somewhere in Namibia.	Zahra had not studied in Namibia.	Zahra had studied in Windhoek.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Zahra had studied in either Windhoek or somewhere in Namibia. However, as a matter of fact, Zahra had not studied in Namibia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Zahra had studied in Windhoek.
RULEBREAKER_0010165_rb	ds	cities	Hydar	he	had studied in	Bahrain	Manama	Hydar had studied in either Manama or somewhere in Bahrain.	Hydar had not studied in Bahrain.	Hydar had studied in Manama.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Hydar had studied in either Manama or somewhere in Bahrain. However, as a matter of fact, Hydar had not studied in Bahrain. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Hydar had studied in Manama.
RULEBREAKER_0010166_rb	ds	cities	Viraj	he	had studied in	Seychelles	Victoria	Viraj had studied in either Victoria or somewhere in Seychelles.	Viraj had not studied in Seychelles.	Viraj had studied in Victoria.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Viraj had studied in either Victoria or somewhere in Seychelles. However, as a matter of fact, Viraj had not studied in Seychelles. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Viraj had studied in Victoria.
RULEBREAKER_0010167_rb	ds	cities	Amelia	she	had studied in	Syria	Damascus	Amelia had studied in either Damascus or somewhere in Syria.	Amelia had not studied in Syria.	Amelia had studied in Damascus.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Amelia had studied in either Damascus or somewhere in Syria. However, as a matter of fact, Amelia had not studied in Syria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Amelia had studied in Damascus.
RULEBREAKER_0010168_rb	ds	cities	Pablo	he	had studied in	Kuwait	Kuwait City	Pablo had studied in either Kuwait City or somewhere in Kuwait.	Pablo had not studied in Kuwait.	Pablo had studied in Kuwait City.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Pablo had studied in either Kuwait City or somewhere in Kuwait. However, as a matter of fact, Pablo had not studied in Kuwait. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Pablo had studied in Kuwait City.
RULEBREAKER_0010169_rb	ds	cities	Daris	he	had studied in	Chad	N'Djamena	Daris had studied in either N'Djamena or somewhere in Chad.	Daris had not studied in Chad.	Daris had studied in N'Djamena.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Daris had studied in either N'Djamena or somewhere in Chad. However, as a matter of fact, Daris had not studied in Chad. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Daris had studied in N'Djamena.
RULEBREAKER_0010170_rb	ds	cities	Aaron	he	had studied in	Slovenia	Ljubljana	Aaron had studied in either Ljubljana or somewhere in Slovenia.	Aaron had not studied in Slovenia.	Aaron had studied in Ljubljana.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Aaron had studied in either Ljubljana or somewhere in Slovenia. However, as a matter of fact, Aaron had not studied in Slovenia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Aaron had studied in Ljubljana.
RULEBREAKER_0010171_rb	ds	cities	Raphaël	he	had studied in	Peru	Lima	Raphaël had studied in either Lima or somewhere in Peru.	Raphaël had not studied in Peru.	Raphaël had studied in Lima.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Raphaël had studied in either Lima or somewhere in Peru. However, as a matter of fact, Raphaël had not studied in Peru. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Raphaël had studied in Lima.
RULEBREAKER_0010172_rb	ds	cities	Gamila	she	had studied in	Democratic Republic of the Congo	Kinshasa	Gamila had studied in either Kinshasa or somewhere in Democratic Republic of the Congo.	Gamila had not studied in Democratic Republic of the Congo.	Gamila had studied in Kinshasa.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Gamila had studied in either Kinshasa or somewhere in Democratic Republic of the Congo. However, as a matter of fact, Gamila had not studied in Democratic Republic of the Congo. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Gamila had studied in Kinshasa.
RULEBREAKER_0010173_rb	ds	cities	Amir-Hossein	he	had studied in	Mexico	Mexico City	Amir-Hossein had studied in either Mexico City or somewhere in Mexico.	Amir-Hossein had not studied in Mexico.	Amir-Hossein had studied in Mexico City.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Amir-Hossein had studied in either Mexico City or somewhere in Mexico. However, as a matter of fact, Amir-Hossein had not studied in Mexico. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Amir-Hossein had studied in Mexico City.
RULEBREAKER_0010174_rb	ds	cities	Emīls	he	had studied in	Uganda	Kampala	Emīls had studied in either Kampala or somewhere in Uganda.	Emīls had not studied in Uganda.	Emīls had studied in Kampala.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Emīls had studied in either Kampala or somewhere in Uganda. However, as a matter of fact, Emīls had not studied in Uganda. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Emīls had studied in Kampala.
RULEBREAKER_0010175_rb	ds	cities	Grace	she	had studied in	Togo	Lomé	Grace had studied in either Lomé or somewhere in Togo.	Grace had not studied in Togo.	Grace had studied in Lomé.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Grace had studied in either Lomé or somewhere in Togo. However, as a matter of fact, Grace had not studied in Togo. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Grace had studied in Lomé.
RULEBREAKER_0010176_rb	ds	cities	Alexandra	she	had studied in	Italy	Rome	Alexandra had studied in either Rome or somewhere in Italy.	Alexandra had not studied in Italy.	Alexandra had studied in Rome.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Alexandra had studied in either Rome or somewhere in Italy. However, as a matter of fact, Alexandra had not studied in Italy. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Alexandra had studied in Rome.
RULEBREAKER_0010177_rb	ds	cities	Lea	she	had studied in	Vanuatu	Port Vila	Lea had studied in either Port Vila or somewhere in Vanuatu.	Lea had not studied in Vanuatu.	Lea had studied in Port Vila.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lea had studied in either Port Vila or somewhere in Vanuatu. However, as a matter of fact, Lea had not studied in Vanuatu. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lea had studied in Port Vila.
RULEBREAKER_0010178_rb	ds	cities	Siphosethu	he	had studied in	Turkmenistan	Ashgabat	Siphosethu had studied in either Ashgabat or somewhere in Turkmenistan.	Siphosethu had not studied in Turkmenistan.	Siphosethu had studied in Ashgabat.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Siphosethu had studied in either Ashgabat or somewhere in Turkmenistan. However, as a matter of fact, Siphosethu had not studied in Turkmenistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Siphosethu had studied in Ashgabat.
RULEBREAKER_0010179_rb	ds	cities	Habib	he	had studied in	Venezuela	Caracas	Habib had studied in either Caracas or somewhere in Venezuela.	Habib had not studied in Venezuela.	Habib had studied in Caracas.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Habib had studied in either Caracas or somewhere in Venezuela. However, as a matter of fact, Habib had not studied in Venezuela. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Habib had studied in Caracas.
RULEBREAKER_0010180_rb	ds	cities	César	he	had studied in	Poland	Warsaw	César had studied in either Warsaw or somewhere in Poland.	César had not studied in Poland.	César had studied in Warsaw.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that César had studied in either Warsaw or somewhere in Poland. However, as a matter of fact, César had not studied in Poland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	César had studied in Warsaw.
RULEBREAKER_0010181_rb	ds	cities	Eevi	she	had studied in	Montenegro	Podgorica	Eevi had studied in either Podgorica or somewhere in Montenegro.	Eevi had not studied in Montenegro.	Eevi had studied in Podgorica.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Eevi had studied in either Podgorica or somewhere in Montenegro. However, as a matter of fact, Eevi had not studied in Montenegro. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Eevi had studied in Podgorica.
RULEBREAKER_0010182_rb	ds	cities	Yǔtóng	she	had studied in	Nigeria	Abuja	Yǔtóng had studied in either Abuja or somewhere in Nigeria.	Yǔtóng had not studied in Nigeria.	Yǔtóng had studied in Abuja.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Yǔtóng had studied in either Abuja or somewhere in Nigeria. However, as a matter of fact, Yǔtóng had not studied in Nigeria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Yǔtóng had studied in Abuja.
RULEBREAKER_0010183_rb	ds	cities	Duarte	he	had studied in	Laos	Vientiane	Duarte had studied in either Vientiane or somewhere in Laos.	Duarte had not studied in Laos.	Duarte had studied in Vientiane.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Duarte had studied in either Vientiane or somewhere in Laos. However, as a matter of fact, Duarte had not studied in Laos. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Duarte had studied in Vientiane.
RULEBREAKER_0010184_rb	ds	cities	Nur	she	had studied in	New Zealand	Wellington	Nur had studied in either Wellington or somewhere in New Zealand.	Nur had not studied in New Zealand.	Nur had studied in Wellington.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Nur had studied in either Wellington or somewhere in New Zealand. However, as a matter of fact, Nur had not studied in New Zealand. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Nur had studied in Wellington.
RULEBREAKER_0010185_rb	ds	cities	Aimar	he	had studied in	El Salvador	San Salvador	Aimar had studied in either San Salvador or somewhere in El Salvador.	Aimar had not studied in El Salvador.	Aimar had studied in San Salvador.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Aimar had studied in either San Salvador or somewhere in El Salvador. However, as a matter of fact, Aimar had not studied in El Salvador. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Aimar had studied in San Salvador.
RULEBREAKER_0010186_rb	ds	cities	Arthur	he	had studied in	Taiwan	Taipei	Arthur had studied in either Taipei or somewhere in Taiwan.	Arthur had not studied in Taiwan.	Arthur had studied in Taipei.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Arthur had studied in either Taipei or somewhere in Taiwan. However, as a matter of fact, Arthur had not studied in Taiwan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Arthur had studied in Taipei.
RULEBREAKER_0010187_rb	ds	cities	Aylin	she	had studied in	Hungary	Budapest	Aylin had studied in either Budapest or somewhere in Hungary.	Aylin had not studied in Hungary.	Aylin had studied in Budapest.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Aylin had studied in either Budapest or somewhere in Hungary. However, as a matter of fact, Aylin had not studied in Hungary. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Aylin had studied in Budapest.
RULEBREAKER_0010188_rb	ds	cities	Mahmoud	he	had studied in	Mauritius	Port Louis	Mahmoud had studied in either Port Louis or somewhere in Mauritius.	Mahmoud had not studied in Mauritius.	Mahmoud had studied in Port Louis.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Mahmoud had studied in either Port Louis or somewhere in Mauritius. However, as a matter of fact, Mahmoud had not studied in Mauritius. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mahmoud had studied in Port Louis.
RULEBREAKER_0010189_rb	ds	cities	Oscar	he	had studied in	Benin	Porto-Novo	Oscar had studied in either Porto-Novo or somewhere in Benin.	Oscar had not studied in Benin.	Oscar had studied in Porto-Novo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Oscar had studied in either Porto-Novo or somewhere in Benin. However, as a matter of fact, Oscar had not studied in Benin. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Oscar had studied in Porto-Novo.
RULEBREAKER_0010190_rb	ds	cities	Dániel	he	had studied in	Albania	Tirana	Dániel had studied in either Tirana or somewhere in Albania.	Dániel had not studied in Albania.	Dániel had studied in Tirana.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Dániel had studied in either Tirana or somewhere in Albania. However, as a matter of fact, Dániel had not studied in Albania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Dániel had studied in Tirana.
RULEBREAKER_0010191_rb	ds	cities	Melina	she	had studied in	Kenya	Nairobi	Melina had studied in either Nairobi or somewhere in Kenya.	Melina had not studied in Kenya.	Melina had studied in Nairobi.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Melina had studied in either Nairobi or somewhere in Kenya. However, as a matter of fact, Melina had not studied in Kenya. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Melina had studied in Nairobi.
RULEBREAKER_0010192_rb	ds	cities	Mohammad	he	had studied in	Argentina	Buenos Aires	Mohammad had studied in either Buenos Aires or somewhere in Argentina.	Mohammad had not studied in Argentina.	Mohammad had studied in Buenos Aires.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Mohammad had studied in either Buenos Aires or somewhere in Argentina. However, as a matter of fact, Mohammad had not studied in Argentina. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mohammad had studied in Buenos Aires.
RULEBREAKER_0010193_rb	ds	cities	Antoni	he	had studied in	Vietnam	Hanoi	Antoni had studied in either Hanoi or somewhere in Vietnam.	Antoni had not studied in Vietnam.	Antoni had studied in Hanoi.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Antoni had studied in either Hanoi or somewhere in Vietnam. However, as a matter of fact, Antoni had not studied in Vietnam. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Antoni had studied in Hanoi.
RULEBREAKER_0010194_rb	ds	cities	Amine	he	had studied in	Malta	Valletta	Amine had studied in either Valletta or somewhere in Malta.	Amine had not studied in Malta.	Amine had studied in Valletta.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Amine had studied in either Valletta or somewhere in Malta. However, as a matter of fact, Amine had not studied in Malta. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Amine had studied in Valletta.
RULEBREAKER_0010195_rb	ds	cities	Lesedi	she	had studied in	Burkina Faso	Ouagadougou	Lesedi had studied in either Ouagadougou or somewhere in Burkina Faso.	Lesedi had not studied in Burkina Faso.	Lesedi had studied in Ouagadougou.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lesedi had studied in either Ouagadougou or somewhere in Burkina Faso. However, as a matter of fact, Lesedi had not studied in Burkina Faso. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lesedi had studied in Ouagadougou.
RULEBREAKER_0010196_rb	ds	cities	Bibek	he	had studied in	Bangladesh	Dhaka	Bibek had studied in either Dhaka or somewhere in Bangladesh.	Bibek had not studied in Bangladesh.	Bibek had studied in Dhaka.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Bibek had studied in either Dhaka or somewhere in Bangladesh. However, as a matter of fact, Bibek had not studied in Bangladesh. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Bibek had studied in Dhaka.
RULEBREAKER_0010197_rb	ds	cities	Elif	she	had studied in	Gabon	Libreville	Elif had studied in either Libreville or somewhere in Gabon.	Elif had not studied in Gabon.	Elif had studied in Libreville.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Elif had studied in either Libreville or somewhere in Gabon. However, as a matter of fact, Elif had not studied in Gabon. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Elif had studied in Libreville.
RULEBREAKER_0010198_rb	ds	cities	Minik	he	had studied in	Comoros	Moroni	Minik had studied in either Moroni or somewhere in Comoros.	Minik had not studied in Comoros.	Minik had studied in Moroni.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Minik had studied in either Moroni or somewhere in Comoros. However, as a matter of fact, Minik had not studied in Comoros. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Minik had studied in Moroni.
RULEBREAKER_0010199_rb	ds	cities	Nikau	he	had studied in	Panama	Panama City	Nikau had studied in either Panama City or somewhere in Panama.	Nikau had not studied in Panama.	Nikau had studied in Panama City.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Nikau had studied in either Panama City or somewhere in Panama. However, as a matter of fact, Nikau had not studied in Panama. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Nikau had studied in Panama City.
RULEBREAKER_0010200_rb	ds	cities	Andrei	he	had studied in	Ghana	Accra	Andrei had studied in either Accra or somewhere in Ghana.	Andrei had not studied in Ghana.	Andrei had studied in Accra.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Andrei had studied in either Accra or somewhere in Ghana. However, as a matter of fact, Andrei had not studied in Ghana. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Andrei had studied in Accra.
RULEBREAKER_0010201_rb	ds	cities	Lilit	she	had studied in	Liberia	Monrovia	Lilit had studied in either Monrovia or somewhere in Liberia.	Lilit had not studied in Liberia.	Lilit had studied in Monrovia.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lilit had studied in either Monrovia or somewhere in Liberia. However, as a matter of fact, Lilit had not studied in Liberia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lilit had studied in Monrovia.
RULEBREAKER_0010202_rb	ds	cities	Alparslan	he	had studied in	Guinea	Conakry	Alparslan had studied in either Conakry or somewhere in Guinea.	Alparslan had not studied in Guinea.	Alparslan had studied in Conakry.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Alparslan had studied in either Conakry or somewhere in Guinea. However, as a matter of fact, Alparslan had not studied in Guinea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Alparslan had studied in Conakry.
RULEBREAKER_0010203_rb	ds	cities	Lilien	she	had studied in	Armenia	Yerevan	Lilien had studied in either Yerevan or somewhere in Armenia.	Lilien had not studied in Armenia.	Lilien had studied in Yerevan.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lilien had studied in either Yerevan or somewhere in Armenia. However, as a matter of fact, Lilien had not studied in Armenia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lilien had studied in Yerevan.
RULEBREAKER_0010204_rb	ds	cities	Maia	she	had studied in	Guinea-Bissau	Bissau	Maia had studied in either Bissau or somewhere in Guinea-Bissau.	Maia had not studied in Guinea-Bissau.	Maia had studied in Bissau.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Maia had studied in either Bissau or somewhere in Guinea-Bissau. However, as a matter of fact, Maia had not studied in Guinea-Bissau. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Maia had studied in Bissau.
RULEBREAKER_0010205_rb	ds	cities	Nóa	he	had studied in	North Korea	Pyongyang	Nóa had studied in either Pyongyang or somewhere in North Korea.	Nóa had not studied in North Korea.	Nóa had studied in Pyongyang.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Nóa had studied in either Pyongyang or somewhere in North Korea. However, as a matter of fact, Nóa had not studied in North Korea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Nóa had studied in Pyongyang.
RULEBREAKER_0010206_rb	ds	cities	Althea	she	had studied in	People's Republic of China	Beijing	Althea had studied in either Beijing or somewhere in People's Republic of China.	Althea had not studied in People's Republic of China.	Althea had studied in Beijing.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Althea had studied in either Beijing or somewhere in People's Republic of China. However, as a matter of fact, Althea had not studied in People's Republic of China. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Althea had studied in Beijing.
RULEBREAKER_0010207_rb	ds	cities	Adrian	he	had studied in	Cambodia	Phnom Penh	Adrian had studied in either Phnom Penh or somewhere in Cambodia.	Adrian had not studied in Cambodia.	Adrian had studied in Phnom Penh.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Adrian had studied in either Phnom Penh or somewhere in Cambodia. However, as a matter of fact, Adrian had not studied in Cambodia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Adrian had studied in Phnom Penh.
RULEBREAKER_0010208_rb	ds	cities	Davit	he	had studied in	Brunei	Bandar Seri Begawan	Davit had studied in either Bandar Seri Begawan or somewhere in Brunei.	Davit had not studied in Brunei.	Davit had studied in Bandar Seri Begawan.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Davit had studied in either Bandar Seri Begawan or somewhere in Brunei. However, as a matter of fact, Davit had not studied in Brunei. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Davit had studied in Bandar Seri Begawan.
RULEBREAKER_0010209_rb	ds	cities	Yuna	she	had studied in	Mali	Bamako	Yuna had studied in either Bamako or somewhere in Mali.	Yuna had not studied in Mali.	Yuna had studied in Bamako.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Yuna had studied in either Bamako or somewhere in Mali. However, as a matter of fact, Yuna had not studied in Mali. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Yuna had studied in Bamako.

RULEBREAKER_0010110_rb

ds

cities

Aariz

he

had studied in

Saint Lucia

Castries

Aariz had studied in either Castries or somewhere in Saint Lucia.

Aariz had not studied in Saint Lucia.

Aariz had studied in Castries.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Aariz had studied in either Castries or somewhere in Saint Lucia. However, as a matter of fact, Aariz had not studied in Saint Lucia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Aariz had studied in Castries.

RULEBREAKER_0010111_rb

ds

cities

Emmanuel

he

had studied in

Afghanistan

Kabul

Emmanuel had studied in either Kabul or somewhere in Afghanistan.

Emmanuel had not studied in Afghanistan.

Emmanuel had studied in Kabul.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Emmanuel had studied in either Kabul or somewhere in Afghanistan. However, as a matter of fact, Emmanuel had not studied in Afghanistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Emmanuel had studied in Kabul.

RULEBREAKER_0010112_rb

ds

cities

Mariana

she

had studied in

Burundi

Gitega

Mariana had studied in either Gitega or somewhere in Burundi.

Mariana had not studied in Burundi.

Mariana had studied in Gitega.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Mariana had studied in either Gitega or somewhere in Burundi. However, as a matter of fact, Mariana had not studied in Burundi. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mariana had studied in Gitega.

RULEBREAKER_0010113_rb

ds

cities

Lethokuhle

she

had studied in

Palau

Ngerulmud

Lethokuhle had studied in either Ngerulmud or somewhere in Palau.

Lethokuhle had not studied in Palau.

Lethokuhle had studied in Ngerulmud.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lethokuhle had studied in either Ngerulmud or somewhere in Palau. However, as a matter of fact, Lethokuhle had not studied in Palau. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lethokuhle had studied in Ngerulmud.

RULEBREAKER_0010114_rb

ds

cities

Lorenzo

he

had studied in

Republic of the Congo

Brazzaville

Lorenzo had studied in either Brazzaville or somewhere in Republic of the Congo.

Lorenzo had not studied in Republic of the Congo.

Lorenzo had studied in Brazzaville.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lorenzo had studied in either Brazzaville or somewhere in Republic of the Congo. However, as a matter of fact, Lorenzo had not studied in Republic of the Congo. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lorenzo had studied in Brazzaville.

RULEBREAKER_0010115_rb

ds

cities

Maligiaq

he

had studied in

Belarus

Minsk

Maligiaq had studied in either Minsk or somewhere in Belarus.

Maligiaq had not studied in Belarus.

Maligiaq had studied in Minsk.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Maligiaq had studied in either Minsk or somewhere in Belarus. However, as a matter of fact, Maligiaq had not studied in Belarus. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Maligiaq had studied in Minsk.

RULEBREAKER_0010116_rb

ds

cities

Aasha

she

had studied in

Latvia

Riga

Aasha had studied in either Riga or somewhere in Latvia.

Aasha had not studied in Latvia.

Aasha had studied in Riga.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Aasha had studied in either Riga or somewhere in Latvia. However, as a matter of fact, Aasha had not studied in Latvia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Aasha had studied in Riga.

RULEBREAKER_0010117_rb

ds

cities

Samvel

he

had studied in

South Korea

Seoul

Samvel had studied in either Seoul or somewhere in South Korea.

Samvel had not studied in South Korea.

Samvel had studied in Seoul.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Samvel had studied in either Seoul or somewhere in South Korea. However, as a matter of fact, Samvel had not studied in South Korea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Samvel had studied in Seoul.

RULEBREAKER_0010118_rb

ds

cities

Dejan

he

had studied in

Greece

Athens

Dejan had studied in either Athens or somewhere in Greece.

Dejan had not studied in Greece.

Dejan had studied in Athens.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Dejan had studied in either Athens or somewhere in Greece. However, as a matter of fact, Dejan had not studied in Greece. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Dejan had studied in Athens.

RULEBREAKER_0010119_rb

ds

cities

Adéla

she

had studied in

Uruguay

Montevideo

Adéla had studied in either Montevideo or somewhere in Uruguay.

Adéla had not studied in Uruguay.

Adéla had studied in Montevideo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Adéla had studied in either Montevideo or somewhere in Uruguay. However, as a matter of fact, Adéla had not studied in Uruguay. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Adéla had studied in Montevideo.

RULEBREAKER_0010120_rb

ds

cities

June

she

had studied in

Russia

Moscow

June had studied in either Moscow or somewhere in Russia.

June had not studied in Russia.

June had studied in Moscow.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that June had studied in either Moscow or somewhere in Russia. However, as a matter of fact, June had not studied in Russia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

June had studied in Moscow.

RULEBREAKER_0010121_rb

ds

cities

Lilly

she

had studied in

Eritrea

Asmara

Lilly had studied in either Asmara or somewhere in Eritrea.

Lilly had not studied in Eritrea.

Lilly had studied in Asmara.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lilly had studied in either Asmara or somewhere in Eritrea. However, as a matter of fact, Lilly had not studied in Eritrea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lilly had studied in Asmara.

RULEBREAKER_0010122_rb

ds

cities

Eleni

she

had studied in

Maldives

Malé

Eleni had studied in either Malé or somewhere in Maldives.

Eleni had not studied in Maldives.

Eleni had studied in Malé.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Eleni had studied in either Malé or somewhere in Maldives. However, as a matter of fact, Eleni had not studied in Maldives. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Eleni had studied in Malé.

RULEBREAKER_0010123_rb

ds

cities

Arman

he

had studied in

Ivory Coast

Yamoussoukro

Arman had studied in either Yamoussoukro or somewhere in Ivory Coast.

Arman had not studied in Ivory Coast.

Arman had studied in Yamoussoukro.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Arman had studied in either Yamoussoukro or somewhere in Ivory Coast. However, as a matter of fact, Arman had not studied in Ivory Coast. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Arman had studied in Yamoussoukro.

RULEBREAKER_0010124_rb

ds

cities

Goran

he

had studied in

Estonia

Tallinn

Goran had studied in either Tallinn or somewhere in Estonia.

Goran had not studied in Estonia.

Goran had studied in Tallinn.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Goran had studied in either Tallinn or somewhere in Estonia. However, as a matter of fact, Goran had not studied in Estonia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Goran had studied in Tallinn.

RULEBREAKER_0010125_rb

ds

cities

Suha

she

had studied in

Switzerland

Bern

Suha had studied in either Bern or somewhere in Switzerland.

Suha had not studied in Switzerland.

Suha had studied in Bern.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Suha had studied in either Bern or somewhere in Switzerland. However, as a matter of fact, Suha had not studied in Switzerland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Suha had studied in Bern.

RULEBREAKER_0010126_rb

ds

cities

Nurislam

he

had studied in

Kingdom of Denmark

Copenhagen

Nurislam had studied in either Copenhagen or somewhere in Kingdom of Denmark.

Nurislam had not studied in Kingdom of Denmark.

Nurislam had studied in Copenhagen.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Nurislam had studied in either Copenhagen or somewhere in Kingdom of Denmark. However, as a matter of fact, Nurislam had not studied in Kingdom of Denmark. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Nurislam had studied in Copenhagen.

RULEBREAKER_0010127_rb

ds

cities

Sobia

she

had studied in

Romania

Bucharest

Sobia had studied in either Bucharest or somewhere in Romania.

Sobia had not studied in Romania.

Sobia had studied in Bucharest.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Sobia had studied in either Bucharest or somewhere in Romania. However, as a matter of fact, Sobia had not studied in Romania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Sobia had studied in Bucharest.

RULEBREAKER_0010128_rb

ds

cities

Ambre

she

had studied in

Azerbaijan

Baku

Ambre had studied in either Baku or somewhere in Azerbaijan.

Ambre had not studied in Azerbaijan.

Ambre had studied in Baku.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ambre had studied in either Baku or somewhere in Azerbaijan. However, as a matter of fact, Ambre had not studied in Azerbaijan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ambre had studied in Baku.

RULEBREAKER_0010129_rb

ds

cities

Matei

he

had studied in

Bulgaria

Sofia

Matei had studied in either Sofia or somewhere in Bulgaria.

Matei had not studied in Bulgaria.

Matei had studied in Sofia.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Matei had studied in either Sofia or somewhere in Bulgaria. However, as a matter of fact, Matei had not studied in Bulgaria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Matei had studied in Sofia.

RULEBREAKER_0010130_rb

ds

cities

Alise

she

had studied in

Norway

Oslo

Alise had studied in either Oslo or somewhere in Norway.

Alise had not studied in Norway.

Alise had studied in Oslo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Alise had studied in either Oslo or somewhere in Norway. However, as a matter of fact, Alise had not studied in Norway. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Alise had studied in Oslo.

RULEBREAKER_0010131_rb

ds

cities

Raquel

she

had studied in

Bhutan

Thimphu

Raquel had studied in either Thimphu or somewhere in Bhutan.

Raquel had not studied in Bhutan.

Raquel had studied in Thimphu.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Raquel had studied in either Thimphu or somewhere in Bhutan. However, as a matter of fact, Raquel had not studied in Bhutan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Raquel had studied in Thimphu.

RULEBREAKER_0010132_rb

ds

cities

Logan

he

had studied in

Saint Kitts and Nevis

Basseterre

Logan had studied in either Basseterre or somewhere in Saint Kitts and Nevis.

Logan had not studied in Saint Kitts and Nevis.

Logan had studied in Basseterre.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Logan had studied in either Basseterre or somewhere in Saint Kitts and Nevis. However, as a matter of fact, Logan had not studied in Saint Kitts and Nevis. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Logan had studied in Basseterre.

RULEBREAKER_0010133_rb

ds

cities

Lourenço

he

had studied in

Philippines

Manila

Lourenço had studied in either Manila or somewhere in Philippines.

Lourenço had not studied in Philippines.

Lourenço had studied in Manila.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lourenço had studied in either Manila or somewhere in Philippines. However, as a matter of fact, Lourenço had not studied in Philippines. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lourenço had studied in Manila.

RULEBREAKER_0010134_rb

ds

cities

Mikołaj

he

had studied in

Ireland

Dublin

Mikołaj had studied in either Dublin or somewhere in Ireland.

Mikołaj had not studied in Ireland.

Mikołaj had studied in Dublin.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Mikołaj had studied in either Dublin or somewhere in Ireland. However, as a matter of fact, Mikołaj had not studied in Ireland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mikołaj had studied in Dublin.

RULEBREAKER_0010135_rb

ds

cities

Tatsuki

he

had studied in

Dominican Republic

Santo Domingo

Tatsuki had studied in either Santo Domingo or somewhere in Dominican Republic.

Tatsuki had not studied in Dominican Republic.

Tatsuki had studied in Santo Domingo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Tatsuki had studied in either Santo Domingo or somewhere in Dominican Republic. However, as a matter of fact, Tatsuki had not studied in Dominican Republic. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Tatsuki had studied in Santo Domingo.

RULEBREAKER_0010136_rb

ds

cities

Hasan

he

had studied in

Australia

Canberra

Hasan had studied in either Canberra or somewhere in Australia.

Hasan had not studied in Australia.

Hasan had studied in Canberra.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Hasan had studied in either Canberra or somewhere in Australia. However, as a matter of fact, Hasan had not studied in Australia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Hasan had studied in Canberra.

RULEBREAKER_0010137_rb

ds

cities

Jacob

he

had studied in

Federated States of Micronesia

Palikir

Jacob had studied in either Palikir or somewhere in Federated States of Micronesia.

Jacob had not studied in Federated States of Micronesia.

Jacob had studied in Palikir.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Jacob had studied in either Palikir or somewhere in Federated States of Micronesia. However, as a matter of fact, Jacob had not studied in Federated States of Micronesia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Jacob had studied in Palikir.

RULEBREAKER_0010138_rb

ds

cities

Mehdi

he

had studied in

Japan

Tokyo

Mehdi had studied in either Tokyo or somewhere in Japan.

Mehdi had not studied in Japan.

Mehdi had studied in Tokyo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Mehdi had studied in either Tokyo or somewhere in Japan. However, as a matter of fact, Mehdi had not studied in Japan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mehdi had studied in Tokyo.

RULEBREAKER_0010139_rb

ds

cities

Yulia

she

had studied in

Myanmar

Naypyidaw

Yulia had studied in either Naypyidaw or somewhere in Myanmar.

Yulia had not studied in Myanmar.

Yulia had studied in Naypyidaw.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Yulia had studied in either Naypyidaw or somewhere in Myanmar. However, as a matter of fact, Yulia had not studied in Myanmar. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Yulia had studied in Naypyidaw.

RULEBREAKER_0010140_rb

ds

cities

Lena

she

had studied in

Portugal

Lisbon

Lena had studied in either Lisbon or somewhere in Portugal.

Lena had not studied in Portugal.

Lena had studied in Lisbon.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lena had studied in either Lisbon or somewhere in Portugal. However, as a matter of fact, Lena had not studied in Portugal. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lena had studied in Lisbon.

RULEBREAKER_0010141_rb

ds

cities

Juana

she

had studied in

Ukraine

Kyiv

Juana had studied in either Kyiv or somewhere in Ukraine.

Juana had not studied in Ukraine.

Juana had studied in Kyiv.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Juana had studied in either Kyiv or somewhere in Ukraine. However, as a matter of fact, Juana had not studied in Ukraine. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Juana had studied in Kyiv.

RULEBREAKER_0010142_rb

ds

cities

Maryam

she

had studied in

Rwanda

Kigali

Maryam had studied in either Kigali or somewhere in Rwanda.

Maryam had not studied in Rwanda.

Maryam had studied in Kigali.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Maryam had studied in either Kigali or somewhere in Rwanda. However, as a matter of fact, Maryam had not studied in Rwanda. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Maryam had studied in Kigali.

RULEBREAKER_0010143_rb

ds

cities

Cillian

he

had studied in

Grenada

St. George's

Cillian had studied in either St. George's or somewhere in Grenada.

Cillian had not studied in Grenada.

Cillian had studied in St. George's.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Cillian had studied in either St. George's or somewhere in Grenada. However, as a matter of fact, Cillian had not studied in Grenada. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Cillian had studied in St. George's.

RULEBREAKER_0010144_rb

ds

cities

Tiago

he

had studied in

Cameroon

Yaoundé

Tiago had studied in either Yaoundé or somewhere in Cameroon.

Tiago had not studied in Cameroon.

Tiago had studied in Yaoundé.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Tiago had studied in either Yaoundé or somewhere in Cameroon. However, as a matter of fact, Tiago had not studied in Cameroon. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Tiago had studied in Yaoundé.

RULEBREAKER_0010145_rb

ds

cities

Míngzé

he

had studied in

Zambia

Lusaka

Míngzé had studied in either Lusaka or somewhere in Zambia.

Míngzé had not studied in Zambia.

Míngzé had studied in Lusaka.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Míngzé had studied in either Lusaka or somewhere in Zambia. However, as a matter of fact, Míngzé had not studied in Zambia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Míngzé had studied in Lusaka.

RULEBREAKER_0010146_rb

ds

cities

Julie

she

had studied in

Tuvalu

Funafuti

Julie had studied in either Funafuti or somewhere in Tuvalu.

Julie had not studied in Tuvalu.

Julie had studied in Funafuti.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Julie had studied in either Funafuti or somewhere in Tuvalu. However, as a matter of fact, Julie had not studied in Tuvalu. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Julie had studied in Funafuti.

RULEBREAKER_0010147_rb

ds

cities

Hina

she

had studied in

Sudan

Khartoum

Hina had studied in either Khartoum or somewhere in Sudan.

Hina had not studied in Sudan.

Hina had studied in Khartoum.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Hina had studied in either Khartoum or somewhere in Sudan. However, as a matter of fact, Hina had not studied in Sudan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Hina had studied in Khartoum.

RULEBREAKER_0010148_rb

ds

cities

Ariel

he

had studied in

South Sudan

Juba

Ariel had studied in either Juba or somewhere in South Sudan.

Ariel had not studied in South Sudan.

Ariel had studied in Juba.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ariel had studied in either Juba or somewhere in South Sudan. However, as a matter of fact, Ariel had not studied in South Sudan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ariel had studied in Juba.

RULEBREAKER_0010149_rb

ds

cities

Margaret

she

had studied in

Ethiopia

Addis Ababa

Margaret had studied in either Addis Ababa or somewhere in Ethiopia.

Margaret had not studied in Ethiopia.

Margaret had studied in Addis Ababa.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Margaret had studied in either Addis Ababa or somewhere in Ethiopia. However, as a matter of fact, Margaret had not studied in Ethiopia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Margaret had studied in Addis Ababa.

RULEBREAKER_0010150_rb

ds

cities

Luknė

she

had studied in

Iceland

Reykjavík

Luknė had studied in either Reykjavík or somewhere in Iceland.

Luknė had not studied in Iceland.

Luknė had studied in Reykjavík.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Luknė had studied in either Reykjavík or somewhere in Iceland. However, as a matter of fact, Luknė had not studied in Iceland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Luknė had studied in Reykjavík.

RULEBREAKER_0010151_rb

ds

cities

Abdoulaye

he

had studied in

Moldova

Chișinău

Abdoulaye had studied in either Chișinău or somewhere in Moldova.

Abdoulaye had not studied in Moldova.

Abdoulaye had studied in Chișinău.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Abdoulaye had studied in either Chișinău or somewhere in Moldova. However, as a matter of fact, Abdoulaye had not studied in Moldova. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Abdoulaye had studied in Chișinău.

RULEBREAKER_0010152_rb

ds

cities

Malachi

he

had studied in

São Tomé and Príncipe

São Tomé

Malachi had studied in either São Tomé or somewhere in São Tomé and Príncipe.

Malachi had not studied in São Tomé and Príncipe.

Malachi had studied in São Tomé.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Malachi had studied in either São Tomé or somewhere in São Tomé and Príncipe. However, as a matter of fact, Malachi had not studied in São Tomé and Príncipe. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Malachi had studied in São Tomé.

RULEBREAKER_0010153_rb

ds

cities

Mohammed

he

had studied in

Cyprus

Nicosia

Mohammed had studied in either Nicosia or somewhere in Cyprus.

Mohammed had not studied in Cyprus.

Mohammed had studied in Nicosia.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Mohammed had studied in either Nicosia or somewhere in Cyprus. However, as a matter of fact, Mohammed had not studied in Cyprus. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mohammed had studied in Nicosia.

RULEBREAKER_0010154_rb

ds

cities

Carl

he

had studied in

Guyana

Georgetown

Carl had studied in either Georgetown or somewhere in Guyana.

Carl had not studied in Guyana.

Carl had studied in Georgetown.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Carl had studied in either Georgetown or somewhere in Guyana. However, as a matter of fact, Carl had not studied in Guyana. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Carl had studied in Georgetown.

RULEBREAKER_0010155_rb

ds

cities

Ju-won

he

had studied in

Jordan

Amman

Ju-won had studied in either Amman or somewhere in Jordan.

Ju-won had not studied in Jordan.

Ju-won had studied in Amman.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ju-won had studied in either Amman or somewhere in Jordan. However, as a matter of fact, Ju-won had not studied in Jordan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ju-won had studied in Amman.

RULEBREAKER_0010156_rb

ds

cities

Yoana

she

had studied in

Andorra

Andorra la Vella

Yoana had studied in either Andorra la Vella or somewhere in Andorra.

Yoana had not studied in Andorra.

Yoana had studied in Andorra la Vella.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Yoana had studied in either Andorra la Vella or somewhere in Andorra. However, as a matter of fact, Yoana had not studied in Andorra. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Yoana had studied in Andorra la Vella.

RULEBREAKER_0010157_rb

ds

cities

Merjem

she

had studied in

Serbia

Belgrade

Merjem had studied in either Belgrade or somewhere in Serbia.

Merjem had not studied in Serbia.

Merjem had studied in Belgrade.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Merjem had studied in either Belgrade or somewhere in Serbia. However, as a matter of fact, Merjem had not studied in Serbia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Merjem had studied in Belgrade.

RULEBREAKER_0010158_rb

ds

cities

Artyom

he

had studied in

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Sarajevo

Artyom had studied in either Sarajevo or somewhere in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Artyom had not studied in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Artyom had studied in Sarajevo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Artyom had studied in either Sarajevo or somewhere in Bosnia and Herzegovina. However, as a matter of fact, Artyom had not studied in Bosnia and Herzegovina. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Artyom had studied in Sarajevo.

RULEBREAKER_0010159_rb

ds

cities

Aysel

she

had studied in

Kingdom of the Netherlands

Amsterdam

Aysel had studied in either Amsterdam or somewhere in Kingdom of the Netherlands.

Aysel had not studied in Kingdom of the Netherlands.

Aysel had studied in Amsterdam.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Aysel had studied in either Amsterdam or somewhere in Kingdom of the Netherlands. However, as a matter of fact, Aysel had not studied in Kingdom of the Netherlands. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Aysel had studied in Amsterdam.

RULEBREAKER_0010160_rb

ds

cities

Zina

she

had studied in

Sierra Leone

Freetown

Zina had studied in either Freetown or somewhere in Sierra Leone.

Zina had not studied in Sierra Leone.

Zina had studied in Freetown.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Zina had studied in either Freetown or somewhere in Sierra Leone. However, as a matter of fact, Zina had not studied in Sierra Leone. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Zina had studied in Freetown.

RULEBREAKER_0010161_rb

ds

cities

Ahmet

he

had studied in

Colombia

Bogotá

Ahmet had studied in either Bogotá or somewhere in Colombia.

Ahmet had not studied in Colombia.

Ahmet had studied in Bogotá.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ahmet had studied in either Bogotá or somewhere in Colombia. However, as a matter of fact, Ahmet had not studied in Colombia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ahmet had studied in Bogotá.

RULEBREAKER_0010162_rb

ds

cities

Sunita

she

had studied in

Nauru

Yaren District

Sunita had studied in either Yaren District or somewhere in Nauru.

Sunita had not studied in Nauru.

Sunita had studied in Yaren District.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Sunita had studied in either Yaren District or somewhere in Nauru. However, as a matter of fact, Sunita had not studied in Nauru. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Sunita had studied in Yaren District.

RULEBREAKER_0010163_rb

ds

cities

George

he

had studied in

Canada

Ottawa

George had studied in either Ottawa or somewhere in Canada.

George had not studied in Canada.

George had studied in Ottawa.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that George had studied in either Ottawa or somewhere in Canada. However, as a matter of fact, George had not studied in Canada. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

George had studied in Ottawa.

RULEBREAKER_0010164_rb

ds

cities

Zahra

she

had studied in

Namibia

Windhoek

Zahra had studied in either Windhoek or somewhere in Namibia.

Zahra had not studied in Namibia.

Zahra had studied in Windhoek.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Zahra had studied in either Windhoek or somewhere in Namibia. However, as a matter of fact, Zahra had not studied in Namibia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Zahra had studied in Windhoek.

RULEBREAKER_0010165_rb

ds

cities

Hydar

he

had studied in

Bahrain

Manama

Hydar had studied in either Manama or somewhere in Bahrain.

Hydar had not studied in Bahrain.

Hydar had studied in Manama.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Hydar had studied in either Manama or somewhere in Bahrain. However, as a matter of fact, Hydar had not studied in Bahrain. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Hydar had studied in Manama.

RULEBREAKER_0010166_rb

ds

cities

Viraj

he

had studied in

Seychelles

Victoria

Viraj had studied in either Victoria or somewhere in Seychelles.

Viraj had not studied in Seychelles.

Viraj had studied in Victoria.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Viraj had studied in either Victoria or somewhere in Seychelles. However, as a matter of fact, Viraj had not studied in Seychelles. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Viraj had studied in Victoria.

RULEBREAKER_0010167_rb

ds

cities

Amelia

she

had studied in

Syria

Damascus

Amelia had studied in either Damascus or somewhere in Syria.

Amelia had not studied in Syria.

Amelia had studied in Damascus.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Amelia had studied in either Damascus or somewhere in Syria. However, as a matter of fact, Amelia had not studied in Syria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Amelia had studied in Damascus.

RULEBREAKER_0010168_rb

ds

cities

Pablo

he

had studied in

Kuwait

Kuwait City

Pablo had studied in either Kuwait City or somewhere in Kuwait.

Pablo had not studied in Kuwait.

Pablo had studied in Kuwait City.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Pablo had studied in either Kuwait City or somewhere in Kuwait. However, as a matter of fact, Pablo had not studied in Kuwait. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Pablo had studied in Kuwait City.

RULEBREAKER_0010169_rb

ds

cities

Daris

he

had studied in

Chad

N'Djamena

Daris had studied in either N'Djamena or somewhere in Chad.

Daris had not studied in Chad.

Daris had studied in N'Djamena.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Daris had studied in either N'Djamena or somewhere in Chad. However, as a matter of fact, Daris had not studied in Chad. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Daris had studied in N'Djamena.

RULEBREAKER_0010170_rb

ds

cities

Aaron

he

had studied in

Slovenia

Ljubljana

Aaron had studied in either Ljubljana or somewhere in Slovenia.

Aaron had not studied in Slovenia.

Aaron had studied in Ljubljana.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Aaron had studied in either Ljubljana or somewhere in Slovenia. However, as a matter of fact, Aaron had not studied in Slovenia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Aaron had studied in Ljubljana.

RULEBREAKER_0010171_rb

ds

cities

Raphaël

he

had studied in

Peru

Lima

Raphaël had studied in either Lima or somewhere in Peru.

Raphaël had not studied in Peru.

Raphaël had studied in Lima.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Raphaël had studied in either Lima or somewhere in Peru. However, as a matter of fact, Raphaël had not studied in Peru. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Raphaël had studied in Lima.

RULEBREAKER_0010172_rb

ds

cities

Gamila

she

had studied in

Democratic Republic of the Congo

Kinshasa

Gamila had studied in either Kinshasa or somewhere in Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Gamila had not studied in Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Gamila had studied in Kinshasa.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Gamila had studied in either Kinshasa or somewhere in Democratic Republic of the Congo. However, as a matter of fact, Gamila had not studied in Democratic Republic of the Congo. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Gamila had studied in Kinshasa.

RULEBREAKER_0010173_rb

ds

cities

Amir-Hossein

he

had studied in

Mexico

Mexico City

Amir-Hossein had studied in either Mexico City or somewhere in Mexico.

Amir-Hossein had not studied in Mexico.

Amir-Hossein had studied in Mexico City.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Amir-Hossein had studied in either Mexico City or somewhere in Mexico. However, as a matter of fact, Amir-Hossein had not studied in Mexico. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Amir-Hossein had studied in Mexico City.

RULEBREAKER_0010174_rb

ds

cities

Emīls

he

had studied in

Uganda

Kampala

Emīls had studied in either Kampala or somewhere in Uganda.

Emīls had not studied in Uganda.

Emīls had studied in Kampala.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Emīls had studied in either Kampala or somewhere in Uganda. However, as a matter of fact, Emīls had not studied in Uganda. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Emīls had studied in Kampala.

RULEBREAKER_0010175_rb

ds

cities

Grace

she

had studied in

Togo

Lomé

Grace had studied in either Lomé or somewhere in Togo.

Grace had not studied in Togo.

Grace had studied in Lomé.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Grace had studied in either Lomé or somewhere in Togo. However, as a matter of fact, Grace had not studied in Togo. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Grace had studied in Lomé.

RULEBREAKER_0010176_rb

ds

cities

Alexandra

she

had studied in

Italy

Rome

Alexandra had studied in either Rome or somewhere in Italy.

Alexandra had not studied in Italy.

Alexandra had studied in Rome.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Alexandra had studied in either Rome or somewhere in Italy. However, as a matter of fact, Alexandra had not studied in Italy. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Alexandra had studied in Rome.

RULEBREAKER_0010177_rb

ds

cities

Lea

she

had studied in

Vanuatu

Port Vila

Lea had studied in either Port Vila or somewhere in Vanuatu.

Lea had not studied in Vanuatu.

Lea had studied in Port Vila.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lea had studied in either Port Vila or somewhere in Vanuatu. However, as a matter of fact, Lea had not studied in Vanuatu. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lea had studied in Port Vila.

RULEBREAKER_0010178_rb

ds

cities

Siphosethu

he

had studied in

Turkmenistan

Ashgabat

Siphosethu had studied in either Ashgabat or somewhere in Turkmenistan.

Siphosethu had not studied in Turkmenistan.

Siphosethu had studied in Ashgabat.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Siphosethu had studied in either Ashgabat or somewhere in Turkmenistan. However, as a matter of fact, Siphosethu had not studied in Turkmenistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Siphosethu had studied in Ashgabat.

RULEBREAKER_0010179_rb

ds

cities

Habib

he

had studied in

Venezuela

Caracas

Habib had studied in either Caracas or somewhere in Venezuela.

Habib had not studied in Venezuela.

Habib had studied in Caracas.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Habib had studied in either Caracas or somewhere in Venezuela. However, as a matter of fact, Habib had not studied in Venezuela. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Habib had studied in Caracas.

RULEBREAKER_0010180_rb

ds

cities

César

he

had studied in

Poland

Warsaw

César had studied in either Warsaw or somewhere in Poland.

César had not studied in Poland.

César had studied in Warsaw.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that César had studied in either Warsaw or somewhere in Poland. However, as a matter of fact, César had not studied in Poland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

César had studied in Warsaw.

RULEBREAKER_0010181_rb

ds

cities

Eevi

she

had studied in

Montenegro

Podgorica

Eevi had studied in either Podgorica or somewhere in Montenegro.

Eevi had not studied in Montenegro.

Eevi had studied in Podgorica.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Eevi had studied in either Podgorica or somewhere in Montenegro. However, as a matter of fact, Eevi had not studied in Montenegro. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Eevi had studied in Podgorica.

RULEBREAKER_0010182_rb

ds

cities

Yǔtóng

she

had studied in

Nigeria

Abuja

Yǔtóng had studied in either Abuja or somewhere in Nigeria.

Yǔtóng had not studied in Nigeria.

Yǔtóng had studied in Abuja.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Yǔtóng had studied in either Abuja or somewhere in Nigeria. However, as a matter of fact, Yǔtóng had not studied in Nigeria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Yǔtóng had studied in Abuja.

RULEBREAKER_0010183_rb

ds

cities

Duarte

he

had studied in

Laos

Vientiane

Duarte had studied in either Vientiane or somewhere in Laos.

Duarte had not studied in Laos.

Duarte had studied in Vientiane.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Duarte had studied in either Vientiane or somewhere in Laos. However, as a matter of fact, Duarte had not studied in Laos. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Duarte had studied in Vientiane.

RULEBREAKER_0010184_rb

ds

cities

Nur

she

had studied in

New Zealand

Wellington

Nur had studied in either Wellington or somewhere in New Zealand.

Nur had not studied in New Zealand.

Nur had studied in Wellington.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Nur had studied in either Wellington or somewhere in New Zealand. However, as a matter of fact, Nur had not studied in New Zealand. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Nur had studied in Wellington.

RULEBREAKER_0010185_rb

ds

cities

Aimar

he

had studied in

El Salvador

San Salvador

Aimar had studied in either San Salvador or somewhere in El Salvador.

Aimar had not studied in El Salvador.

Aimar had studied in San Salvador.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Aimar had studied in either San Salvador or somewhere in El Salvador. However, as a matter of fact, Aimar had not studied in El Salvador. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Aimar had studied in San Salvador.

RULEBREAKER_0010186_rb

ds

cities

Arthur

he

had studied in

Taiwan

Taipei

Arthur had studied in either Taipei or somewhere in Taiwan.

Arthur had not studied in Taiwan.

Arthur had studied in Taipei.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Arthur had studied in either Taipei or somewhere in Taiwan. However, as a matter of fact, Arthur had not studied in Taiwan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Arthur had studied in Taipei.

RULEBREAKER_0010187_rb

ds

cities

Aylin

she

had studied in

Hungary

Budapest

Aylin had studied in either Budapest or somewhere in Hungary.

Aylin had not studied in Hungary.

Aylin had studied in Budapest.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Aylin had studied in either Budapest or somewhere in Hungary. However, as a matter of fact, Aylin had not studied in Hungary. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Aylin had studied in Budapest.

RULEBREAKER_0010188_rb

ds

cities

Mahmoud

he

had studied in

Mauritius

Port Louis

Mahmoud had studied in either Port Louis or somewhere in Mauritius.

Mahmoud had not studied in Mauritius.

Mahmoud had studied in Port Louis.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Mahmoud had studied in either Port Louis or somewhere in Mauritius. However, as a matter of fact, Mahmoud had not studied in Mauritius. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mahmoud had studied in Port Louis.

RULEBREAKER_0010189_rb

ds

cities

Oscar

he

had studied in

Benin

Porto-Novo

Oscar had studied in either Porto-Novo or somewhere in Benin.

Oscar had not studied in Benin.

Oscar had studied in Porto-Novo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Oscar had studied in either Porto-Novo or somewhere in Benin. However, as a matter of fact, Oscar had not studied in Benin. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Oscar had studied in Porto-Novo.

RULEBREAKER_0010190_rb

ds

cities

Dániel

he

had studied in

Albania

Tirana

Dániel had studied in either Tirana or somewhere in Albania.

Dániel had not studied in Albania.

Dániel had studied in Tirana.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Dániel had studied in either Tirana or somewhere in Albania. However, as a matter of fact, Dániel had not studied in Albania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Dániel had studied in Tirana.

RULEBREAKER_0010191_rb

ds

cities

Melina

she

had studied in

Kenya

Nairobi

Melina had studied in either Nairobi or somewhere in Kenya.

Melina had not studied in Kenya.

Melina had studied in Nairobi.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Melina had studied in either Nairobi or somewhere in Kenya. However, as a matter of fact, Melina had not studied in Kenya. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Melina had studied in Nairobi.

RULEBREAKER_0010192_rb

ds

cities

Mohammad

he

had studied in

Argentina

Buenos Aires

Mohammad had studied in either Buenos Aires or somewhere in Argentina.

Mohammad had not studied in Argentina.

Mohammad had studied in Buenos Aires.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Mohammad had studied in either Buenos Aires or somewhere in Argentina. However, as a matter of fact, Mohammad had not studied in Argentina. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mohammad had studied in Buenos Aires.

RULEBREAKER_0010193_rb

ds

cities

Antoni

he

had studied in

Vietnam

Hanoi

Antoni had studied in either Hanoi or somewhere in Vietnam.

Antoni had not studied in Vietnam.

Antoni had studied in Hanoi.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Antoni had studied in either Hanoi or somewhere in Vietnam. However, as a matter of fact, Antoni had not studied in Vietnam. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Antoni had studied in Hanoi.

RULEBREAKER_0010194_rb

ds

cities

Amine

he

had studied in

Malta

Valletta

Amine had studied in either Valletta or somewhere in Malta.

Amine had not studied in Malta.

Amine had studied in Valletta.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Amine had studied in either Valletta or somewhere in Malta. However, as a matter of fact, Amine had not studied in Malta. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Amine had studied in Valletta.

RULEBREAKER_0010195_rb

ds

cities

Lesedi

she

had studied in

Burkina Faso

Ouagadougou

Lesedi had studied in either Ouagadougou or somewhere in Burkina Faso.

Lesedi had not studied in Burkina Faso.

Lesedi had studied in Ouagadougou.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lesedi had studied in either Ouagadougou or somewhere in Burkina Faso. However, as a matter of fact, Lesedi had not studied in Burkina Faso. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lesedi had studied in Ouagadougou.

RULEBREAKER_0010196_rb

ds

cities

Bibek

he

had studied in

Bangladesh

Dhaka

Bibek had studied in either Dhaka or somewhere in Bangladesh.

Bibek had not studied in Bangladesh.

Bibek had studied in Dhaka.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Bibek had studied in either Dhaka or somewhere in Bangladesh. However, as a matter of fact, Bibek had not studied in Bangladesh. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Bibek had studied in Dhaka.

RULEBREAKER_0010197_rb

ds

cities

Elif

she

had studied in

Gabon

Libreville

Elif had studied in either Libreville or somewhere in Gabon.

Elif had not studied in Gabon.

Elif had studied in Libreville.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Elif had studied in either Libreville or somewhere in Gabon. However, as a matter of fact, Elif had not studied in Gabon. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Elif had studied in Libreville.

RULEBREAKER_0010198_rb

ds

cities

Minik

he

had studied in

Comoros

Moroni

Minik had studied in either Moroni or somewhere in Comoros.

Minik had not studied in Comoros.

Minik had studied in Moroni.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Minik had studied in either Moroni or somewhere in Comoros. However, as a matter of fact, Minik had not studied in Comoros. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Minik had studied in Moroni.

RULEBREAKER_0010199_rb

ds

cities

Nikau

he

had studied in

Panama

Panama City

Nikau had studied in either Panama City or somewhere in Panama.

Nikau had not studied in Panama.

Nikau had studied in Panama City.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Nikau had studied in either Panama City or somewhere in Panama. However, as a matter of fact, Nikau had not studied in Panama. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Nikau had studied in Panama City.

RULEBREAKER_0010200_rb

ds

cities

Andrei

he

had studied in

Ghana

Accra

Andrei had studied in either Accra or somewhere in Ghana.

Andrei had not studied in Ghana.

Andrei had studied in Accra.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Andrei had studied in either Accra or somewhere in Ghana. However, as a matter of fact, Andrei had not studied in Ghana. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Andrei had studied in Accra.

RULEBREAKER_0010201_rb

ds

cities

Lilit

she

had studied in

Liberia

Monrovia

Lilit had studied in either Monrovia or somewhere in Liberia.

Lilit had not studied in Liberia.

Lilit had studied in Monrovia.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lilit had studied in either Monrovia or somewhere in Liberia. However, as a matter of fact, Lilit had not studied in Liberia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lilit had studied in Monrovia.

RULEBREAKER_0010202_rb

ds

cities

Alparslan

he

had studied in

Guinea

Conakry

Alparslan had studied in either Conakry or somewhere in Guinea.

Alparslan had not studied in Guinea.

Alparslan had studied in Conakry.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Alparslan had studied in either Conakry or somewhere in Guinea. However, as a matter of fact, Alparslan had not studied in Guinea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Alparslan had studied in Conakry.

RULEBREAKER_0010203_rb

ds

cities

Lilien

she

had studied in

Armenia

Yerevan

Lilien had studied in either Yerevan or somewhere in Armenia.

Lilien had not studied in Armenia.

Lilien had studied in Yerevan.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lilien had studied in either Yerevan or somewhere in Armenia. However, as a matter of fact, Lilien had not studied in Armenia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lilien had studied in Yerevan.

RULEBREAKER_0010204_rb

ds

cities

Maia

she

had studied in

Guinea-Bissau

Bissau

Maia had studied in either Bissau or somewhere in Guinea-Bissau.

Maia had not studied in Guinea-Bissau.

Maia had studied in Bissau.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Maia had studied in either Bissau or somewhere in Guinea-Bissau. However, as a matter of fact, Maia had not studied in Guinea-Bissau. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Maia had studied in Bissau.

RULEBREAKER_0010205_rb

ds

cities

Nóa

he

had studied in

North Korea

Pyongyang

Nóa had studied in either Pyongyang or somewhere in North Korea.

Nóa had not studied in North Korea.

Nóa had studied in Pyongyang.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Nóa had studied in either Pyongyang or somewhere in North Korea. However, as a matter of fact, Nóa had not studied in North Korea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Nóa had studied in Pyongyang.

RULEBREAKER_0010206_rb

ds

cities

Althea

she

had studied in

People's Republic of China

Beijing

Althea had studied in either Beijing or somewhere in People's Republic of China.

Althea had not studied in People's Republic of China.

Althea had studied in Beijing.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Althea had studied in either Beijing or somewhere in People's Republic of China. However, as a matter of fact, Althea had not studied in People's Republic of China. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Althea had studied in Beijing.

RULEBREAKER_0010207_rb

ds

cities

Adrian

he

had studied in

Cambodia

Phnom Penh

Adrian had studied in either Phnom Penh or somewhere in Cambodia.

Adrian had not studied in Cambodia.

Adrian had studied in Phnom Penh.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Adrian had studied in either Phnom Penh or somewhere in Cambodia. However, as a matter of fact, Adrian had not studied in Cambodia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Adrian had studied in Phnom Penh.

RULEBREAKER_0010208_rb

ds

cities

Davit

he

had studied in

Brunei

Bandar Seri Begawan

Davit had studied in either Bandar Seri Begawan or somewhere in Brunei.

Davit had not studied in Brunei.

Davit had studied in Bandar Seri Begawan.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Davit had studied in either Bandar Seri Begawan or somewhere in Brunei. However, as a matter of fact, Davit had not studied in Brunei. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Davit had studied in Bandar Seri Begawan.

RULEBREAKER_0010209_rb

ds

cities

Yuna

she

had studied in

Mali

Bamako

Yuna had studied in either Bamako or somewhere in Mali.

Yuna had not studied in Mali.

Yuna had studied in Bamako.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Yuna had studied in either Bamako or somewhere in Mali. However, as a matter of fact, Yuna had not studied in Mali. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Yuna had studied in Bamako.